HomeMy WebLinkAboutParcel Map 29431 Specific Drainage Plan #219 (Oct.25,1999)
.
I
I -
.
.
I
..
.
.
.
.
I
..
I
I
I
.1
I ~I
J
CITY OF TEMCULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Shawn Nelson
Gary Thornhill
Peter Thorson
Bill Curley
Ron Parks
Debbie Ubnoske
plerry Alegria
Annie Bostre-Le
Matthew Fagan
FROM: Carole Donahoe
DATE: October 25. 1999
SUBJECT: Corona Appeal of the Home Depot Project - Research Documents
With the help of Annie Bostre-Le and other Public Works staff, I have assembled the
fOllowing excerpted documents for your review prior to our discussions regarding the
Corona appeal. I have listed some documents without including excerpts, in order to show
the chronology of events.
1. Soecific Plan No. 219 - The Meadows at Rancho California
Adopted by Riverside County Board of Supervisors by Resolution No. 88-470,
9/6/88, Pages 25 thru 26 - Drainage Plan description and development standards
EIR 235 to Specific Plan No. 219, Pages 31 5 thru 321 - Flooding existing
conditions, flood hazard mitigation, impact; Page 434 - Unavoidable Adverse Impact
EIR Mitioation Matrix
Pages 7b and 7f - Flooding, Public Facilities and Services
Preliminary Drainaoe Assessment for the Meadows, dated August 18,1987 by RBF,
in Technical Appendices of the EIR. (Copy to be provided by Newland Communities
on 10/25/99)
2. Develooment Aareement No.4, Instrument No. 325513, Recorded Nov. 7, 1988
Between Riverside County and Kaiser Development Company
Pages 14 thru 17 - Public Facilities Mitigation Fee, Financing of public improvements
Develooment Aareement No.5, Instrument No. 325515, Recorded Nov. 7, 1988
Transferring DA #4 to the City. (No excerpts referencing drainage).
Amendment and Restatement of the Develooment Aareement, Paloma del Sol
Instrument 62043, recorded Feb. 18, 1993, w/KRDC, Inc. and Mesa Homes - No
F:\DEPTS\PLANNINGlPlanning Filcs\28Spa99.oppeal docs listdoc
\
I
,
-
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
reference to drainage (focus was on park dedications, public facility fees).
3. Vestina Tentative Tract Maos: County Staff Report pages 4-6, County COAs for
VTM 24182 w/RCWCFCD letter dated June 19, 1989, Environmental Assessment
City Staff Report for VTM 24183, COAs, Initial Environmental Study. RCWCFCD
letter dtd 5-20-91, Bedford letter dated 8-5-91.
City DRC Comments on TTM 24184 - Phasing
City COAs for VTM 24182 First Extension of Time. 12/8/92 wI RCWCFCD letter dtd
Oct. 22, 1992 ... need to get
VTM 24182 Drainage Study'" prior to recordation
City COAs for VTM 24184 (1" Extension!. VTM24185 (1" Extension!. VTM24186
(1" Extension!. VTM24187 (1" Extension!. VTM24188 (1" Extension)
4. Soecific Plan Amendment No.1, from Bedford PropertieslMesa Homes
Page I, iv-viii, A-1, 32, 184-185
(Drainage Plan text is same as Document #1; Drainage Plan exhibit amended)
Resolution No. 91-36, April g, 1991, COAs, RCWCFCD letter dtd 5-26-88.
Soecific Plan Amendment No.2, revision exhibits only
Soecific Plan Amendment No.3, revision exhibit only
Soecific Plan Amendment No.4, descriptive text only
(Drainage Plan text and exhibit is same as Document #1 and amended exhibit.
Phasing Plan is unchanged).
Soecific Plan Amendment No.5, 1/28/97 (PA96-0106)
Conditions of Approval reference underlying COAs for SP 219 and its amendments;
no agency letter from RCWCFCD listed.
Soecific Plan Amendment No.6, descriptive text only.
Conditions of Approval reference underlying COAs for SP 219 and its amendments;
no agency letter from RCWCFCD listed. TCSD added COAs for parks
5. Addendum to EIR: Flooding text is same as Document #1.
6. Aooeal from the Law Offices of Susan Trager, by Michelle Staples, for the Corona
family. Requests construction of the Butterfield Stage Interceptor channel facilities
prior to the issuance of building permits for Home Depot or any other development
within Paloma del Sol.
a. Claims that the City has not enforced COAs that mitigate offsite flooding.
b. Claims that the City has amended the original entitlement without addressing
flooding.
c. Claims that the City cannot rely on Ad159 to remedy the flooding.
Corona correspondence dated October 19, 1 999, presented at the Council meeting.
Savala letter
Newland resoonse with letter to the Planning Commission.
F:\DEPTS\PLANNING\Planning Filcs\28Spa99.oppeal docs listdoc
2
1,.
i
3
...
~
I
I r~
<
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219
A THE MEADOWS
'\v/ AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ADOPTED BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 9-6-88
DATE
RESOLUTION NO. 88-470
1\
I
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
.
I
.
'.
.
3. prainage Plan
a. Drainaqe Plan Description
The majority of the project site is located within the
Temecula Creek watershed, close to the confluence of
Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek. The site generally
drains in an east to west direction,and is eventually
tributary to Temecula Creek through a number of existing
culvert crossings of Highway 79. Total off-site tributary ~
area is composed of approximately 192 acres from Butter- ~I~
field stage Ranch to the east of the site. ?,'> 1/50 +- -ZZ.3&f1>?
'II" ' 6tico.. :;z 06-;:' t:- ~s.
Obviously with development of the site the natural on-site
drainage courses will be altered to a certain extent. After
development, new drainage courses will consist of streets,
channels and swales, underground storm drains and/or a
combination of the above. A significant amount of off-site
as well as on-site flows will be piped under the green-
belt/paseo system (Figure 7). The majority of water will
exit the site to the west and south in pipes varying in
size up to 120 inches in diameter. The actual size and
location of the drainage system will be determined at the
tract map stage of development.
A small portion of the northern part of the site may be
within the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan under the
jurisdiction of the Riverside County Flood Control Dis-
trict.
b. Drainaqe Plan Development Standards
1) Drainage and flood control facilities and improvements
shall be provided in accordance with Riverside
County's Flood Control and Water Conservation District
requirements.
2) It is anticipated that drainage/flood control facili-
ties will be maintained by the County Flood Control
District.
3) Please see Sec. V.C.4., Flooding, for mitigations
viewed as further development standards for drainage.
25
~
p,,:
o w
0, N ..,
~ ~ /:;~~
CD '"of":: t,
1\):1'o.,~~":~:i~\
.1/ ....
""1..\
. 'i~ ~\
"
W :~
~ .;,
~i
~,:
U
:/
"
.1
'I
if ~l'
~; ti n
. \1' 'I '"
- "I. i .9
,I ", .,.~~ ',' '0> I
,\ II ''1:.,
1.\ :, ~I g, ~
" I. ~.. _.
\. ,\!. .~, '" 'j ... w
t.\, ! _.j;...~ :",,'" . :t ~
~ , .. -. '1\
;"':"'-"," ",' I, "\... I
.,~c,. '.\ i,
",? .' ...,,>
' W"-:f i.
\' ,
.l \\
' " '"
~" " ".' ,
.... ~,.~ ",., ~
-:"".,-~,. ~. '.~ . . 11 /.:
r ',., ,~,_ ". ....,.,.... ".
"""'-"::::-~""'::~q\l...,<.... . ".~ _';, I
'~',I .....' ~.r-- It ' I'!"'- I... ~~ 6 \\
II ",. \.. f,~~ S, i ,j. I II
,... l' -, '~I.
IL '\. 1.1 . /"'l'_~ ! ~\\
., ". Co' 0 ... . .
.., fl . ..' ,,I, .,.It,,-,_..,
:;, ',-."" I ......,;;:; _"'<;
r .of'o-.... "": ~
. . .;" ;.. <1 e
' \ . ..::" ., ;11'
. . ... ,'I .", "
" . I', ~ w '" ,
" . J, .,'.,- ''', W .; .......if
'....)I'1i('/,' ." . ~~\'~,. (;11 '\\
': ., .,'. ..I, m"" u .,
.'/ ',\ 'j " ;;1 "~'''''' ,:; [I i "\.
.n..", 1 "....1 _...........'.....,
," "'.:' .',' ..-., -"=.
,',' -..\....'.;.;;,::.._<" ....- p ":
.'J" . ... ';"'.: .g. ~
.i'i!' ; 0"
,: '"
~l ....
~: ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
p>
o '
Q. ~
~i:D
o
,
0>
. '
o. !D
",0
~
0>
. '
o ~
....
"'.
~o
p>
o .
o '"
~!"
~...
'"
;"
f
'l
I'"
, .
. ",,'" ~
. ..... "': ..:L ~.......,
O ..........1...............,. ,....."...._.>--_.~
> .......--..--..-..-..-..--
. .
o -
.'"
w~
"':"
'"
0>
g ~
.'"
",,,,
",'
-'"
.
'~"l""
. .
. .
..
"t.
,
,
Ii
......
()
~~
;;;o::C
>m
z ....
n~":
::r:: ~
Ornw
n>
~t:J
00 .
~ < ';"~i
.....-<::;'"
>CfJE
I
I
-
z
I
...,
I
r
m
Cl
m
z
C
rnrnrJ
".
..
'Z
00
.x
,0
: !j;!
.0
2 ~
".
'.
!:lo
w~
. ~
_0
.,
.~
l~
~~
~~
'z
f~
~
.
..
..
.
o
~
i<
;;
'"
,
o
W
N
.
o
c
.
o
m
"
o
.
m
"
"
.
m
~
.
E
>
.
,
"
o
.
"
.
~
o
~
m
.
~
m
1)
00-
....Z
0'-
"m
7....
00
....
o
"
~
mQ
X"
...."
moo
7~
2;
I
I
II
I!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
v - General Plan / Environmental Analysis
~
I
11\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- Final slopes will be contour graded and will blend into
natural contours.
3. wind Erosion and Blowsand
The project site is not located within the wind/erosion or
blowsand area designated within the Comprehensive General
Plan. This topic also was not identified as an area of
concern within the Notice of Preparation for the project.
Therefore, the issue of Wind Erosion and Blowsand is not
addressed within this EIR.
4. Flooding
The following discussion is based upon a "Preliminary
Drainage Assessment for The Meadows at Rancho California"
(August 18, 1987) prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates. This report is included in section D.,
Technical Appendices.
a. Existinq Conditions/General Plan Policies
The project site is within the jurisdiction of the River-
side County Flood Control District and Water Conservation
Agency. All hydrologic calculations performed for the
current analysis were based on the Riverside County hydro-
logy methods as outlined in their manuals.
The majority of the project is located within the Temecula
Creek watershed, close to the confluence of the Temecula
Creek and Murrieta Creek. A small area in the northern
portion of the site does drain directly into Murrieta
Creek. (See Figure 56, Existing Hydrology.) Temecula
Creek is an extremely large regional watershed encompassing
many square miles of area. Temecula Creek is also being
currently studied by the Riverside County Flood Control
District. There are no existing floodplain maps for
Temecula Creek; however, there may be regional flooding
adjacent to Highway 79.
As shown on Figure 56, Existing Hydrology, the majority of
the site drains in an east to west direction and is eventu-
ally tributary to Temecula Creek through an existing under
capacity battery of culvert crossings of Highway 79. Off-
site drainage enters the site from the east along Butter-
field Stage Road. The area east of Butterfield Stage Road
and north of De Portola Road is known as "Butterfield Stage
Ranch". This area currently has tentative maps prepared
and the developed flows tributary from this drainage area
have been determined. This total off-site tributary area
amounts to 192 acres and off-site flows are tentatively
planned to enter the project boundary at four locations in
storm drain pipes. These storm drains will be connected to
the master plan drainage system for the specific plan area.
(See "Impacts" below.)
315
.to
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
One other significantly large off-site drainage basin has
been identified which may impact the project. This area is
located east of Butterfield stage Road and south of De
Portola Road and is naturally tributary to Temecula Creek.
(See Figure 56, Existing Hydrology.) A regional master
plan of the area could include this as a tributary to the
intersection of De Portola Road and Butterfield stage Road,
but was not considered in this analysis since it is not
naturally tributary at this location. Coordination with
the land use master plans and property owners should be
investigated to refine the location of this system.
The remainder of the smaller drainage basins originate.
on-site since the project is located on or near the ridge-
line. The small drainage areas are generally in the form
of small narrow canyons in the northerly portions of the
site which are very steep. The slopes of the drainage
courses flatten significantly where they discharge into the
Temecula Valley near Highway 79. Temecula Valley is an
alluvial wash type valley and this is a typical response
for this type of drainage pattern.
A portion of the project site may be located within the
Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan and would be subject to
drainage fees. The Temecula Valley area has a drainage fee
of $932/acre associated with development. Approximately
142 acres of the site is within this assessment area. The
remainder of the site is not encumbered with ~ny other
known drainage fees.
General Plan Policies
(
The project site is shown as being subject to inundation
from Vail Dam on the County Map of Dam Inundation Areas _
100 Year Flood Plains - Area Drainage Plans. Though not
depicted as lying within the limits of an Area Drainage
Plan, the project engineers have stated that approximately
142 acres of the site lie within the Temecula Valley Drain-
age Area and that northern portions of the site may lie
within the Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan.
The following Land Use Standards - Flooding from the Envi-
ronmental Hazards and Resources Element of the Comprehen-
sive General Plan are applicable to the project site:
1. Flood Hazard Mitigation Proposed developments are
reviewed for location in flood hazard areas, inClUding
floodways, floodplains, areas subject to sheetflow or
local ponding, and dam inundation areas. A drainage
study may be required. All flood-related hazards must
be adequately mitigated.
;
316
~
I
I
cl\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
o
~
o
.
~
~
0>
- .
O~
Ow
.
~
"
, ,
I ~L:"'J" ,. k" .
= ", __..l....._.. I, .. I' .....r \. I I '" i"
I. .... ~: I tlO"!",, .",~ I' '-/ I \ r' ,r
;. 'I,. .. ..... , .' ",. ,
f ~ (~"" -..tIc ;lit' ,....... :~..... '.!<.,
~~ '.. .... ".e..':;'" #. I' l {G.
0> ~P:;. ... '. ,.....'fI ~.'~' ,fIi I.....~ '<I I!f- ..
o' It' '1, t.., . ;'.i.~' .....~ ,"',f ....
0:;: I. ..... f....~......" :...;t.;. ~ ..... l~
IN . """'. .~'l...s-'" ',', . "" ,,- . ,-..,.~
~ ; .,..~..,. '. . ',,' ',. : ~."..!,.".."" .
" I' .... ~ .... .... :...'C,'. ..<.
:~~ .~..~.: ~ ,,4111" .~~.. .....~ "I". -."''':::.
!p' :1', I;' 1......;.1....,~ :;.. '.~ \ fo'jJ..;,~ 'f"
a I fI"~- ~~ 1".""" ~J:: .'~..... I, ",
00 I ,t..,,~.:::'L_.'..... :., "I~: ,- :=1.,,_1... ':I....~
I ....,_..~-.' ,. ~~... -.~~-~ .. ,.
_CD I .'~ "'. .,,~.. ...,.1; .. ,', ..,'~.~ ..... \
(It <,~ '~." :~..~ '\'..: .... ':-It..~<~...;;~.~".
~ 1 ,. ~~.'. ' ..,,:....,.~..... :~ ,!:;"l . __C'''''t.r''~''''''''
~ ! '- ., .,,""'"" . ,.
.,' I" . . .. -t.' .. ....... -.
"'~ .._.,,~, :.,' '.. ..,.-:.';.",- : ...
" 'l'" '."" ' . "'" ,- -
..:, 'll...j - ~.; .: 1 :. ~~....
I~r, ......~.. H ~ . c. ~"- ,. ..Iii
. ~ '" .., :)' ,. I ' ..', '#. ..,
I' ~,* .......~..q,......,.L.,~.... . ,:,.,. -.:'l!
> ,0 ..~;:,/ . ~.. ~ ..~: .. ' ... 'ft""'-'''''
q ..':~ .. .~..,;; I~" .<<..... -. ,~
~. " '-I'l". .."" '"'' #'!..
~ ....,., ~~ <': '" .....:..;.. . 1'"..,.4.. ....1'
. ..'. .,~{ < I.. .,_ : ',; 'r- '~'I;::..''''f'l(!,t....l''''
I .. ., l,' .~.... . ~.; f... t:- 'i.~&~ ~jo"
.... ~~',. ;'1. ~..., :, .:1. l "'.. f!?....~~~'....,
.... .~.. !I. ..', ~ ~~;t' ~., ,...! ~;.. ~~ ~'"~~..~:,
0> ....I..I~.!~~.!.~."I..... .,~. .~. ' \i \... .... '..f,'1
_ . .. \:'. Po""1\: , I."'~" 'f". .~ . - .. t,-... '# .'
g..., ..... l'-:f'-j..,~ ('. ..~ ~ ".I 1'"" ..
. ~ :: .. .,' i"'~'i. ttr ''\'.\ ~ ,,<'1';" I J.
~ ' '" ,'.:: ,:...! 1/....., ,.f.\.};l' ,,\' .....<i;"..\,. ",:;::.:~') ',1 :'1
~.... . 'I .',,- . ..'}::" .",,,.L-
~#I... ,;. "-'''..''' -(~ ,....~ ,. .. :'-"'-" ~.;;'
I ~...""i!';''''''~'''''';''''''' .',;->' '\" ". .. c, .:~. I.
9:': ",-,\' ................. .... '\ . ,~... ...... 5 -:1:"
a..... 'f,\.-"'/- .. ..,~ ,~"~..- II..~..'.......'-N JJ
~:: \\i ... .:)..,~ '" .', ~
~ .'. . r'. ..'
C) '#.' . '. :'. .
o "f. : p~
~," : 71'" ':. .
. .
: ~ !
. ~
. . i
.
l'\=~
" '~1.'-'
.,:.....'"""'..
0>
- .
o~
~"
;:;
~
Q$:
Om
n>
~u
~Q
5=C73
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
z
C)
~
C
:D
o
6
Q
,...
m
lO)
m
Z
c
~~[l
&'<
. ~
_0
-.
-.
~~
. "
a
1<
..
~
.
"
"
.
o
~
iz
;;;
~
,
o
w
~
.
o
c
.
n
.
.
o
.
.
.
"
.
.
.z
!
"
c
>
.
.
.
o
.
"
>
z
o
>
.
.
o
n
S
.
o
g~
zm
!j;!"
,,3!
-(m
c
en
c;
lD
~
z
~
"
>
r
~
~
J!
/;
"
lJl
s
o
-(
~
"
~
;::
~
;::c
c;"
,,>
~~
>m
Cl>
""
mm
m>
'"
....
o
....
is
"
;
'"
.P>.
w
~
l
.
l!
Ij
i'
,r
..
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2. Floodplains - If a development proposal includes an
area located in a floodplain, all new structures and
substantial improvements to existing structures
shall be constructed on a pad the elevation of which
is up to or above the 100-year flood elevation. A
drainage study may be required.
3 . Drainage Improvement Fees A development proposal
located within the boundaries of an adopted Area
Drainage Plan is required to pay a fee in the amount
set forth in the plan for the support of drainage
improvements.
Rancho Villages Development Criteria applicable to the
project is as follows:
a) Development shall not result in increased flood
hazards to adjacent or downstream properties. In
order to avoid these hazards, both on- and off-site
improvements may be utilized. Drainage fees or
other appropriate mitigation measures may be
required to improve the area's flood control system
prior to development.
b. proiect Impact/Relationship to General Plan Policies
Development of The Meadows at Rancho California Specific
Plan would require a combination of cuts and fills which
would alter the existing on-site drainage patterns. Howev-
er, no drainage area will be diverted from its natural
tributary drainage course. Development of the site will
result in increased runoff due to the creation of impervi-
ous surfaces. Figure 57, Drainage Plan, includes calcu-
lated 100-year frequency discharges associated with project
development. Calculations were based on the Riverside
County Flood Control District Hydrology Manual and Proce-
dures.
As shown on Figure 57, Drainage Plan, the storm drain
master plan is comprised of several large conduit systems
which traverse the project. The largest of these storm
drain systems intercepts proposed storm drains from the
development to the east of Butterfield Stage Road. This
system ranges in size from a 39" to a 120" diameter storm
drain. This system generally follows the same alignment
and direction as the existing drainage pattern, flowing in
an east to west direction. This system will outlet into
its natural streamcourse when it leaves the eastern project
boundary at the crossing of Margarita Road. The configura-
tion of the storm drain outlet at Margarita Road will be a
concrete energy dissipation/flow spreading device in order
to mitigate higher pipe exit velocities and provide a
non-erosive velocity into the existing stream. As previ-
ously discussed project implementation will result in
318
\\
I
I
I
,,<\
...~'~
cK.:~.' ,.\
~..r' "1'1"
. il
f .
~n ~
. If
i.I' II
.... :"'1 ~'"
Uttt "',' I
........ e.!'\oll.~ '
II ",.. .-\
~ . a 0
\.. ",. .i
.\ "I \l" ii' '"
\\ t~ . 0
"', l' \, I ....,. .
.'flo....:;,.;. \. 'Z '0 - 0 ~
..~..'; '.\ " Ii .' I
,. "._ .. \~" ,'. ,_ ..., o. ~
"1 .~ f' l~ .". '"1-'
,; ..", Ii" t ': . ~c"
.,!~ l/~ ....,,'.... ..s,:'"
'O::i-ill...:i ,I!'plli:" \
.. "'...... ". I. \,...,.;. ~I'
'\' ...."'o:'l. ...:-'
:t~..:::--....:/ f
I ~ :,' '-~ 11..::::::- 7",>.. I
I ^- '.. ,~, "r~;'" ......~ I
~.... 1 il, 'I I" ;:
II...:,. r. .51' .il "<"
,. . I /,1 "-. 1" I
. ""il . ',." --~ -.
"I. <. ,t,:"' .,' . , ~,
."' . '1 .J \I ~
~,r1 "....,. III. .," I ~,
_ ~,-. ';, '....." h ... ~ . '\
":. \ .,!.r"t~11 IN..
.. . .;;.' ..~ l~
\, ',:"''' ~'t"'t\ p 1\
~" . '.7 !.. -~..~
~ . ,:. ...... ........,.,...~......
,tOo, IIf? I! :s -'-...r,,;
I ". ...l .f",>,. ", '"l- '
"9 _II I"~ III 1:.'-' ~
::, - ''1; ""'f';-':,'" .... ~ .. I" ) ~:, ~
/,' ~\II,.\l:""'. ,.~ . :r !' C
/,1' ... :. ,t< ! 1 I!!
.. ',' .,_. '. III t.
'" ;.r ~I t,\:'::! II .. ...., t
,./1 .:..",t!- u~ ,....., .,~ J-....,.-~
.. ~. .", . II .
/. .~~..~ .~'..,.":i! ,. :il' w. >-- ~ : ,II
. ~ .t",...~~~'......'" .~'- .' ", G' ,"' .
,. ,I"~\ '.:_.1 -..~.._"....."-\:~, ...,,~.I .~~~Ji:l;..,.....~...- .. 11 ~\
i1'{f ::!. -:' "~!,f!'~ .._..~=,.'.~~.""L~J
! . p>-','"
\\ CD 0 . '.
~., ... 0 ...
o .~
;. . ....
~~.-'"-..,,:w.....w~ ,_"~"_.~~ ~ (0)
,"'-
I
I
I
p>
o .
o w
.~
~.
w~
;.
~
p>
o .
o ~
. -
~Ca
..
0>
. .
o .
....
~.
.0
p>
o .
o '"
~;'"
.....
'"
;.
0>
. .
o ..
...
~..
~N
'r~
...
'!-
~_'!i':!::
\.'..
~{l
,~"""
.'
~
II
.
":
.
!'l
<>
~--1
;;<J::C
>m
z .....,.
n ~O';' I
-. I
I-rl g. CJ) :
...... _!-' Ir.
Q ww '1'
m' ii
;::> lit
t: 0 I
001
~ ~ ';"~j
>- (f) E I
,
!
. .. I
,." ": l
............
0>
- .
g. to
w,"
..~
~
2
.
o
m
~
m
m
.
"
m
.
;<
!
E
~
.
.
o
~
.
~
~
e
N'
">
~~
""
10
;S
ig
.
"
00
!~
- ~
~~
".
m
/lz
, "
~2
~~
-.
I
n
,
.
N
W
8
~
jz
'"
'"
,
..
w
~
"'\.\
I
I
~I
z
~I
3!
r-
m
Cl
m
Z
C
rnrnrJ
w
w
~
en-
....z
0'-
::em
;:::::'
en
....
o
::e
;::
mO
x."
....."
men
~=i
<i
I
,J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
increased runoff. In order to mitigate
runoff at Margarita Road outlet, the larger
drain could be realigned to discharge
Temecula Creek.
the increase in
east/west storm
directly into
Three storm drain systems are proposed along the southern
project boundary to outlet directly into Temecula Creek.
The precise discharge locations would have to be determined
by off-site owners. These three storm drains generally run
in a north to south direction, generally following the
existing drainage pattern. The proposed storm drain system
in Butterfield stage Road will intercept two proposed storm
drains by the adjacent development to the east. All of the
storm drain outlets will be higher pipe outlet velocities.
Relationship to General Plan Policies
The Meadows at Rancho California Specific Plan responds to
The Land Use Standards for Flooding, as follows:
1) Flood Hazard Mitigation In accordance with these
standards, a drainage study has been prepared,
resulting in the Figure 57, Drainage Plan. This
study is included as Section D, Technical Appendices.
Due to the site's location within a "Dam Inundation
Area" of the Vail Dam, the development proposal will
be reviewed for siting constraints by the County
Flood Control District and the County Planning
Department.
2) Floodplains - The site does not lie within the identi-
fied floodplain area, though additional study of the
Temecula floodplain is recommended. (See "Mitiga-
tions". )
3) Drainage Improvement Fees - If required, the developer
will contribute $932 per acre for the approximately
142 acres of the site which lie within the Temecula
Valley Drainage Area. A portion of the project site
may also be subject to fees associated with the
Murrieta Creek Area Drainage Plan.
In accordance with the Rancho Villages Development crite-
ria, development will not result in increased flood hazards
to adjacent or downstream properties. As discussed above,
drainage fees will be paid for those portions of the site
located within the Temecula Valley or Murrieta Creek Area
Drainage Plans. .
c. Mitiqations
A more in-depth assessment of the Temecula floodplain
should be conducted during the final design and preparation
of the tentative tract maps. The study will require a
regional hydrologic analysis of the Temecula Creek water-
320
o
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
shed and detailed floodplain mapping of the Temecula Creek
adjacent to the project site.
All improvements will be constructed in accordance with the
standards of the Riverside County Flood Control District.
r
f
Erosion control devices will be utilized in hillside devel-
opment areas to mitigate the effect of increased runoff at
points of discharge. possible devices may include tempo-
rary berms, culverts, sandbagging or desilting basins. The
configuration of the major storm drain outlet at Margarita
Road will be a concrete energy dissipation/flow spreading
device in order to mitigate higher pipe exit velocities and
provide a non-erosive velocity into the existing stream.
5. Noise
The issue of "Noise" was addressed in the "Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report for Rancho Villages General Plan
Amendment", sponsored by Kacor Realty and submitted to the
County of Riverside in August, 1980. A Noise Assessment
was performed as part of that General Plan Amendment EIR by
the firm of Hilliard and Bricken. As The Meadows at
Rancho California Specific Plan is being proposed in
accordance with that GPA, that Noise Assessment is hereby
incorporated by refer-ence into this Draft EIR
document. However, specific policies and development
criteria related to noise are included in the following
discussion.
a. Existinq Conditions/General Plan Policies
As the project site is presently undeveloped, it
little noise. Primary existing noise sources in
ject area include vehicular noise along State
Margarita Road, De portola Road, and Pauba Road.
generates
the pro-
Route 79,
General Plan Policies
The project site is not shown as noise impacted, per the
County of Riverside Airport Noise Impact Area Map. The
Environmental Hazards and Resources Element of the Compre-
hensive General Plan includes Land Use Standards addressing
Noise. Those which are relative to the proposal are listed
below:
1) The following uses shall be considered noise sensitive
and shall be discouraged in areas excess of 65 CNEL
(dBA): Single and multiple family residential, group
homes, hospitals, schools and other learning institu-
tions, and parks and open space lands where quiet is a
basis for use.
2) Proposed noise sensitive projects within noise impacted
areas shall be required to have acoustical studies
321
,,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
2. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Unavoidable adverse environmental effects are those which
cannot be eliminated or sUfficiently mitigated through
design measures to render them insignificant. These are,
therefore, inevitable consequences inherent in the project
and its ultimate construction. For the purpose of this
EIR, the probable adverse impacts are those common to most
residential development. These impacts have been discussed
previously in section V.C., Environmental Hazards and
Resources Element and section V.D., General Plan/Environ-
mental Analysis and, therefore, they will only be summa-
rized here.
a. Seismic Safetv. Slopes. and Erosion
Grading for the project will involve cut and fill opera-
tions which will alter the existing landform. Ground
surfaces which are temporarily exposed during grading may
be eroded.
Because of the presence of regional faults, the potential
exists for structural damage as a result of earthquake
activity. (See section V.C.l., Seismic Safety, and Section
V.C.2., Slopes and Erosion.)
b. Floodinq
The volume and peak flow of surface runoff generated on-
site will increase as a result of the creation of impervi-
ous surfaces, such as roadways, driveways and other urban
uses. Runoff entering the storm drain system and Temecula
and Murrieta Creeks will contain pollutants typical of
urban use. Ground water recharge may be somewhat reduced
by project development. (See Section V.C.4., Flooding.)
c. Noise
Short-term noise from construction activities may temporar-
ily impact areas on the project site and in proximity to
the project site. Noise related to future daily traffic
volumes and general urban activities on the project site
will increase local acoustical levels, affecting the pro-
ject site and surrounding areas. See Section V.C.5.,
Noise.
434
t
~
I
I
I
I
...
..
~
o
8-
_.
,
'"
(') 0 ~ ""3 ~ I/'l ~., I ltl l:l> ., :J: I
.,.....Cltl....CQltlO )::ll'tlltlo
~ .... 2: ~ :;::,.... ~ ~ ;;;. Q,~ ~ ltl
)<' ;- :::: 0 ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ~. 0 ~rn
c:....!b 0::1 -1tI J: 3
UI ........QlI/'l ....'0 IC..... Ill""
....::1 DI ""'l' n::l lit 0 IV
~ IC o.J; ; ~ t: QI Ul"tl ~
.... nm::r 1ll....::I Dl::r n'tl:; III
t:::r.,.... ........:1,.,. "".....Olllltl
....ltllP'<IIl_~ :l030::l"
:::l to """ 0 III 0 ~::r 0"........
o l'I" C":l :l D1..... III r: "'.....
ItI ., ~ tb n III 0 :l ... 0
:l .... I"! 0 J'I) I"" "C l: III n .....
..,.::r!'1"Q.m.....a.:r QI........
/111l1::r....QI rIl ..,.a.....'tl
., "": 0 ., III ......, .... 0.....,....
:l C ltl I'll 3 C III 1tI fll :l l10 ::r
~"C'g.~o.-g5~' ;;;O:ltll
~g ltl2~::::ltl :r'~""'r:<:
~.~.~,a.g~'Q.~. /"I"QgOl
....0 a.........Cc_ ::r............
0>::1110....11I11I... ltlClla.....
III n n I
....::r_~
r>go;
",.
~.~ltl n
., UI a. 0
,
e:~n~
III ... 0 "'I
n , 0
:r n a.n
e;gCl""
.co--
41111I....0
, . '
",n
0" 0
_010>....
, n,
~ltla.~
" "
00'
'", .
g,1lI:;
~,.
qL
0)'\
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
-'"
..,~
0"'
,
....
_c
~!
-'"
~
"'
...
><
r+....UI
::r::rl'tl>'
. . .
~~ ' ~~
....o.Q.cn....
!D"'lI'D........
. 0 < III ....
~'-
0.... ' QI
"'0 ..
....'00"""
n tD ., 0
1lI0'1lI::l
.... ....1Il
n'"
00"
, '"
cn.,ltl
...
., tn-'t1
"", ~
""'0 Il.I
, , ,
"0.
. "
0""
~o.
() C/I n I
0/1"0)1<
CQI::l_
:1::111I....
~a.;:r
"0_
"""03
....0.....'0
gtnll"!
0. 0
0"", <
n.....::lltl
o 3
~....DI m
., :T n ::l
01'\)01"'1'
_ o.
"
g~g-I/'l
tn<:l:T
....m 0 III
.,.,llI....
-0 -
~....~
0...0-
.".
....O'C"1"t1
QI r1' ll.0' I ltlllllD::r>
1""'::r/ll(DtIl ::IUI I'tI
ltl< ., ,.......0 3
"C 1lI 0 D> \0 0 "i' 0
o tD....c:; CIl ....:l:l tD"
~""'O....1o'- ~ o.3ltl
....:;'''C ~ 0 t'll no c t'll
O'ln:l....:l :lnO~
It rta.rtC::::l
or"'::I ... n ... t'll.... I
....0 f"O NO lli"O a.1li ~
.... lD::I n.., 'tI
e: e a. rt f"O lD a.::rt
III 10"10 ~ 3"t1 c 0 ::r
g.~ no~"" ~ ~ :!.8.",
1li",,1/I:l 'l/Ilt1:l'tl1ll
"'It'll a.., rt\O....1II
.a III I"" t'll ,... lilt'll
t'll III 0 ::r < 0 l"I" lo'.tIl
,t'll 10'."'" :l::r::ll/l
a. 3.... n I'D 3
,... t'll 0 IIIlD
..,rt....1II ........::r::l
c ""11I "'.0 rt
::I \0 ..,. ( l"I"::I C
g~a.: ~~O:~
l1lt'lllD....
"".'t!::ra.a.):I1Il I
::I.., ""lD ..,.0 l"I" 'i
b~'g.~.lIl[s.~
....lD l/I :I
I"" a. 1"( n "".1: n
::r t'll I'D.",... a. 0
III ." 1>>......,::1
B'1o'.,... ....GI....
lD "':lrt ....,...
~.= lD ~'tr:l~
l/I 0 lD 0 :l I'D 0 "'I
::.1 ~.ci.""Ql; %
~~rtt'll:n;;'o
O<"'OOrt::l
Vltnt'll 1:::1
!"I'........rt n Ql 0
"1<00 "!rtl1l
t'll t'll n III t'll
~<:;~.'g:;~;
't'll... t'll ""t'll
O:~nog'€B
n \0 a. I'D ", I>>
"".QlII>....."'!.........
!"I' ::I l"I"::I \Q rt 0
><a.l1loJ:l'<llI",
'tl:J:.......O....rtOIl> I
....cID::r",...::r,,'tI...
~::t'llt'll~.~~~.'tI....
~. (II (II :l :l ....
III "".11>:( 'tl II> ...."
t:1>>~'g~~~~~
(II e:::l c::
n III m "':l 0............
" 0 *< "l ::1;1 ",
It n I'D rt 'tI
It' "".Cl no:r o..,:t lD
:-r II> ...., lD.... 0 .... a.
III <......
,..;0 ;:("0 (f)....
.., a.tr)o 3::r ~ rt
(f) t'll I'D t'll::l n:r
lli~lll'8gtn!"l'Ot'll
0"".5-'" ;~"'l;:''''C
= ~~.::<ID g '"!..,
... nO Ili :t III ....0
::I l"I"::I....:r tr'-'.
nol"l" .............Ct'll
'" :r... 0 III n 0 !"I' n
i't' (f) o,.,.,*<:r.., I'Dl"I"
,-. .
)
--
I
I
I
....
o
n
"
~
o
,
o
~
..
..
"
,
"
"
0-
I
"
"
"
,
w
'"
e
'"
~
w
,
..
~
"
,
0.
"
"
0.
.
I
C
"
"
,
"
'"
e
'"
~
"
,
..
n
"
,
0.
"
"
0.
.
I
C
"
"
,
"
'"
.
'"
~
"
,
..
..
"
,
0.
"
"
0.
.
I
"
"
"
-
,
"
'"
.
'"
~
"
,
'"
..
"
,
0.
"
"
0.
.
I
C
"
"
-
,
"
'"
.
'"
~
"
,
..
~
"
,
0.
.
"
0.
.
I
"
"
"
-
,
"
"
.
'"
~
"
,
'"
..
"
,
0.
"
"
0.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
0,. "'
..'" .
"0 .
.~
. _ 0
'" n ,
,w .
"', -
.n 0-
"' -
.c .
-.
n< '"
. "
"~ "
'" 0 n
"''''
".
0" "
< .
""
~n
'"
.. <
- .
. ,
e ~
0..,,.
"0'"
,'"
'n~
""-
",on
,~"
'" ,
e"~
"-,
3."
-~.
~"<
-.
.n~
'" "0
'" '"
"w.
o ~"
<
" ~"
.......::1
30-
e
..,
~
o
o
0.
0,.
..'"
'"
3~
"-
"'n
'w
"',
.~
"'
3"
-.
..<
e
"~
"00
"''''
"e
0"
<
"w
-~
~
3
.
0,.
..'"
'"
0._
.-
< n
e"
~,
o~
""
3C
..
, <
...
~
o
'"
.
"
"
~
n
-
3
e
0,.
..'"
'"
o.~
.-
< n
e"
-,
o~
""
3 C
. .
, <
~.
~
o
'"
.
"
"
..
n
3
e
~..,,.
-~'"
30'"
.o~
0._
o n
....,"
0'
3'~
"..,
"'""
'0'
'" ~<
. e
"C~
3 _0
-.'"
nn.
" "
w_
",n"
'" n,
" 0.
0"
<~
W
~
)
I
I
I
I
~
o
==
. e.
. .
o~
co
" "
o~
.0
.
.
o
l>
..
"
.
"
...
.
...
o
"
~
o
00"03:....'
ri O:~~.
%:~;;;~
~::I~~g3
0,... ::I....no
'e....CIl..... :;
n '0 1lI"C III
1ll0lt1l....'"i
........ n ... 0
..-0 "C
~. ........::. t1l
....'<.... ~
. 00
~.
aO,'tI ....
~lt"""""'"
Ill:r""
"ftll:ll'lllO
~... .
;:-:'"i2<c-
~o ::.e.g
. '<0,......
..
c
..
t'
;:;
..
1i
!:
..
'"
'"
~
c
'"
l'l
=
::
"
l'l
'"
~
"
~
"
o
c
..
...
~
o
o
H
en ....,.." ~... I
.....-:'0 ..,Jill ~
,.,.....".-:. :::r
tD"tl.. 0 C'> tD
, . g~.g~~-
C ....1'lI r+ III 3
g~o~~'''''QI
0:........ ;:....3: ~
1'D n'tl III 1JI
0'''' ....1lIQ1
ID'< n t1l r1" a.
. 0
m,,",Or1'o.i(
X 0 3~. III
;;~"C"C r+tI)
., 0 III 0'0
::I 0.... t1l
III rt)"g.o ~
....g,r+.,g~
fL.,.....g.l'll n
:rO,<'"i"C
;::IQ/~i;'
lilt'll. .....t1l::r
III ....:1'-::1 'tI::c.... 0 "0 tIl'1:: Il.- I
t1l 0 0 Q/ 0 0 ......, RI .., ::I 'tI
., C ::l ~ ., Ql" o..c 0 .....,
<::ICr+~o. CIl,-,,3'-' 0
~'o.fr:r~ tn~~g~~~
t1l IIlO'<....:;<....ro-r+....O
.... r+.,.... 0 l"'";; III Q/ "C r+
~ 0 0 ~g....t1l III ;;~.~::....
1ll:r....::IQ.:r"n 1lIt1l~
....QI r+ 1tI 0 0.... 0.....
I/'l<;-~'"" CO"C~~. ....
C t1l ......0 O"C r+.. 1Il .....0....
..... It'O""''''' ~<_ n
'tl .. 0 tr r+.... ..,
~O~5'~'g~~ID~.~~g
. VI n fir 0 III r+ :l C .... a
r+.... 0.::1 l'D....lD W ...t/l :r0'"
o I.... r+ 0....," ........ t1l ....
"1~g tI'l 0" 1lI'<,..p...~
~ '0 III ~ :: 3 ~ l:'"' g, ~ ::I 0.
.,...,. C Ill.... 'tI n t1l c. C
1Il1'D!l) t1lIllDot\l<I'"'Ct"l"..
It' n.. r+ In -'0 III :rlll:r.....
. r+1'II ...., DI rI"_I'tl"< t1l::r
".::c:o:::c'tltllr+llltnIllDlllltllr"'tI1
ClOIllOIll ::r::l....::IO'It.Ill::r-o-i
III l\I ....11. "'! tn m o,"'! II> ::l ~ 1I>::r
~o.~~;~~"l%l~:5.II>~.....::l~
tit ~ II> 0 :< C ,... It. 0 II> <<:
'< rt n'<::l.....,... z.....::l .....0 0 ...::tl
0:; ~g; tffig-o:::~'
"'!O'......I/I~g~::IO';tlO lb
Ul,... c'<.......,... III ... Co <<: 0' "'!
. <<:.Ilo 0 ....l(,... .0 II> "'m VI
';tl III _ tIl "'! : ~ lb O::r Q.::l ...
. '< cO -rt Ill.... .0 C.
........~OC.::l~'tIIII::r 3'~
--..l.... ::r.,... <<: ..... 0..... lb II> lD "tI
","'!lbltll> Ul:!:::lo.olllx.....n
o .. '< 'tI f"" III Q. 3 n!b 0
E' It'..... III 11' -. III 'tI ~ l:r lb 3 c
II> x........ c.o.o "'! ....::l III "tI III ::l
1Il:i;;~;g~~'<ci~~~;~
III ::l 0. 3 ';tl..... z 0 lb
~~. ::-:3'g :;~6'tr~::l~~
3 "'! 0 (/) ~ tl1 0. .. II> __.....1Il III
III r ::l .... .... a.~' !:I:l ci a. I'll" <<: III
.......0 II> III 0 C ,... rt .......
0_ 0.0 ltI II> n l1>.o 1I>::r lD III rt ltI
"'!1lI....!t''''!tn......a.::r(lll1la.-::r'''!
\}
-'1
I
I
I
I
trnfr.3Illtr<Otll I
'< 0 ell>..... III ltI 0 ........
::l tr"O ... rt.o < ........
"'11I ~'t1 rt ~ ~ tD
.:;"..~. e.~
ltI........o."'! ......0' "(II'"
rT..l1l rTtIlt-"'lD:;tI rt
ItI ::l n ..... CO... ~ ...
~.o ~ ~...."::l,, <:: lD tl>
III .... 11l....1I>1ll In....
>c 3 lD a. nil> ::l 0.... 0 ....
n I-"- C/! r+ ~ a. ~ --..l;:l 0
III ::l .... n tIl I'D r-.l' 3 ::l
~""'~'O <:Ja..CD~
rt &.0 -111 '-111 '"::I
""'_ "'::llll (II 0''' 0.
0....0''' 0. .....:r'< 'b
::l,< 11l n grt "1;' 0..
;og;;:;:::O~l1l;'
"'......:l 0..111 ...."0 O..c III
:;.... ~-....~::: ~ '1....
:( n C < _ 0
Ortlll'"'llI.... C....
ltI:lltl:lo.O:lO
...a.a.tnQ./Il.....O''1
III 111 n I
.....o....n
:;~ '"' g
...:; ~ ~~
" e.
p;....-'"'....
.....t'llIllC..
~~"":;1lI
o ...............
CIl 0 0 .....
<t'll::l::lO
0" .
....< Olll
C......::l11l
. 0 .
lJlt'llrt....
~ <<:::1
~O'
c"
~ ~~
" 0
1lI<<:-g
o ~.
. -.
,-l>
....1lI.... n .....<:::I::l::l I
....~:r031l10!llc"'3
"'!II lD ::I "0... rt n ::r
. III '"'... I'D 3 t'll
,.. <....0 CIltr
. 0.11I "'I < Q. CIl "i
.....lb ..... C III :J:..... III t'll .,
. ....... n 3 lD "'I "'I ., III
.. I-"- :; g 1lI1t1,< :::
t")::l if a..... 0. nO'"
::;'lll Ill...... (II ~:'o 111 0
n D> go::l 1lI III '< (/)
I::....:(:l a........
:;~lIlgC.~~;;3g,
~ Ul.3.n ci ........."0'<
0""."0 c ........... 1lI..c "'! .,
:l::l~g'E~;;~o~
'tI ................. a. ~ < 0
- tIl 11I...;t. ~ a
\ll ltI nO rt......3 3
?n ::l...."'30,eltlg
...."o:(o:r Ill_a.
...._..... 0.... n - It.
Oll>rtO'C/!:rrtr+
:l::l:rlDlDI'DtIltn\ll
"'{/)~"''''l .
a ....... 0 lD 3:
"O......c III 0.....
OlD~~Ort
< 11l III a ...
/Il::o ,<;I
/i:o tIlt'll..c
::II>> -.J ::llll
..... a. Ow o.rt
1/1:(- "'I1tI....
. . l>
'< = 0
......~..... ::I
....0...111
::10...0
I"'" 3 C '1 a
lD a tn lD
"'~~Olll
Ulc..\ll::lUl
/Il'b1"'"1
o c.. III Ul C
rT a...."'l
~'g .....rt ~
::I I ::IItUl
U)~..... I
..........;:1 !:I:l
"''''''
lD C., lD
):l"OO
o III ~ 0
~ 33
f ;:g 3
'<" rtlD
.0
-'" l>
.a~~lll
"'0 lD a.
~ .
..l>
3 ItI ltI 0
lb::l"O."
:10....
..../IlO....
Ulo.rl
. . .
cl>
~ -
.........1"'"
, . .
(f.\lltll"O I
c't! .....1lI "'3
'g"O'g;:i
~"1lI1-"-
~. 0.... o'tl
It. < 1-'....
011 3" 0
"'IO'.....D/U.
tII :::rt~
l:r..c III I""
'<.
1""....."0
1"'"....::1"'1
_ 0 0
;;::ll""'tl
,,0
".0
"" .
00 0
1lI.o"'3....
- ., .,
o.IlI1l1Ul
3 ....::r
~.
o D/ ........
....lIln...
I
I
I
I
I
I
-l'l
"...
0=
.
"'"
_c
i~
-'<
~
'"
...
x
J
, ...
" 0
o 0
o .
l> ...
- -
" 0
- .
o
o 0
~
o
~ '"
"
> .
.. 0
'C 0.
" .
o "
< 0.
.
-
,
"
"
o
c
-
.
"
~
o
o
..
-
.
o
'"
"
.
o
l>
.
"
l>
.
,
n
-
"
o
c
-
.
...
-
o
.
..
~
.
o
'"
...
.
o
l>
.
"
0.
.
,
"
"
o
c
~
.
"
o
o
..
-
.
o
'"
"
.
.
l>
.
"
0.
.
,
"
-
"
o
c
-
.
"
-
o
.
..
-
.
o
'"
"
.
o
0.
.
"
0.
.
,
"
-
"
o
c
-
.
"
o
.
..
~
.
.
'"
"
.
o
0.
.
"
0.
.
I
I
I
I
I
c.n> ;:G
(tI 0'0 (tI
< COO III
..~
I-' I"t >- 0
0'< 0
'C ..
9 /,II::l 0'
(tI1"t1"t >-
:I AI..... I-'
I"t"",,o m
~.
< ..
.. .
,,- "
o "
"..
~.
~ '1 lD
.
O.
~l> <
.
o
"
0>
~'C
..
0._
.-
<0
..
-.
0"
'C....
",
..
0<
".
-
o
..
.
"
.
"
"
~
.
.
Q.1lI 0''''
(tI1Il,,",,'tl
< ~'C
(tIAI II-'
I-''Otn>-
O'tl >-0
"0 '1 I"tl>>
;:I 0 (tI::l
''C "
::lff"C'
1"t>-"1C
.0'
"'C <
...
"~
." 0
"'<'C
.
"0"
-<
. 0 .
..0
"l>
o.
~
,,>
_'C
''C
.-
".
00
~.
o
l>"
.....
<0
..
-<
O.
'C_
.0
...
o.
,,"
.
"
C.1lI0>
llllJl,,",,'O
< ~..
lDllIll-'
...'tIfII_
0"C >- 0
"C"'lrtlll
a 0 ttI ::l
. 'C ...
::l"1'tl.....
rT...."1C
. 0 .
"'C <
...
"-
. "0
"'<'C
.
"0"
-<
'0.
"0
"l>
o.
~.
0>
~'C
'C
l>_
.-
< 0
..
_0
0"
'C....
'0
. .
. <
"~
o
'C
.
~
.
"
"
.
.
)
-'
\lb
lD
3
I\)
.
I'
I"
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
.,
"
l.,
l.,
N
.,
Recorded at request of
Clerk, Board of Supervisors
County of Riverside
i
~~
It ...
fH
a 0
I~
When recorded return to
Riverside County Planning Director
4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
DEV~LOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 4
A development agreement between
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
and
KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Specific Plan No. 219 - Vail Meadows
!l!~1
- jt~"
~ ~A U
~ I!f ,I
..
I/-
\~
OCT 6 19&8
tJ /._
I. t .:........
I
1.:-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
'l"'i
~~
L,'j
N
M
Development Agreement No.4
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
HEADING
RECITALS
1.
DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1.1.3
1.1.4
1.1.5
1.1.6
1.1.7
1.1.8
1.1.9
1. 1. 10
1.1.11
1. 1. 12
1.1.13
1. 1. 14
1. 1. 15
1. 1. 16
1.1.17
1.2
Definitions
Agreement
COUNTY . .
Development
Development Approvals
Deveiopment Exaction
Development Plan . . .
Effective Date. . . .
Existing Development Approvals
Existing Land Use Regulations
Land Use Regulations
OWNER
Mortgagee
Project
Property . .
Reservations of Authority
Subsequent Development Approvals
Subsequent Land Use Regulations
Exhibits ...
2.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.4.1
2.4.2
2.4.3
2.4.4
Binding Effect of Agreement
Ownership of Property
Term. . . . . . .
Assignment . . . . . .
Right to Assign
Release of Transferring Owner
Subsequent Assignment . . . .
Partial Release of Purchaser,
Transferee, or Assignee of
Industrial or Commercial Lot
Termination of Agreement With
Respect to Individual Lots upon
Sale to Public and Completion
of Construction . . . . . . . .
Amendment or Cancellation of Agreement
Termination
Notices
2.4.5
2.5
2.6
2.7
i
PAGE
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
8
8
8
1P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
~
L":l
L";)
N
M
SECTION
HEADING
PAGE
10
3 .
DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY
3.1
3;2
Rights to Develop
Effect of Agreement on Land Use
Regulations . . . . .
Timing of,Development
phasing P~an . . . . .
Changes and Amendments
Reservations of Authority
Limitations, Res~rvations and
Exceptions . . . . . . . . . .
Subsequent Development Approvals
Modification or suspension by
State or Federal Law
Intent . . . . . . . . .
PUblic Works . . . . . .
provision of Real Property
Interests by COUNTY . . . .
Regulation by Other Public Agencies
Tentative Tract Map Extension
Vesting Tentative Maps
10
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.6.1
10
10
11
11
11
3.6.2
3.6.3
11
13
3.6.4
3.7
3,8
13
13
13
3.9
3.10
3.11
13
14
14
l4
4.
PUBLIC BENEFITS
14
4.1
4.2
Intent. ..
Public Facilities and Services
Mitigation Fee . . . .. ..
Amount and Components of Fee
Time of Payment . .. ..
Reduction for Low-Occupancy
Annual Fee Adjustment
Credits ....
Continuation of Fees
14
4,2.1
4,2,2
4,2.3
4.2,4
4,2.5
4.3
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
5.
FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
17
6.
REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE
17
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
Periodic Review 17
Special Review. l7
Procedure . ... 17
Proceedings Upon Modification
or Termination . . . . . . . . 18
Hearing on Modification or Termination 18
Certificate of Agreement Compliance 18
6.5
6.6
7.
INCORPORATION AND ANNEXATION
19
7.1
7.2
7.3
Intent . . . .
Incorporation
Annexation. .
19
19
19
ii
"V\
I
I(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11j
L":I
N
M
SECTION
HEADING
8 .
DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
Remedies in General
Specific Performance
Release . . . .. . ...
Termination or Modification of
Agreement for Default of OWNER
Termination of Agreement for
Default of COUNTY
8,5
9,
THIRD PARTY LITIGATION
9.1
9.2
General Plan Litigation
Third Party Ligitation Concerning
Agreement .....
Indemnity ... .
Environment Assurances
Reservation of Rights
Survival. ...
9.3
9.4
9.5
9.6
10,
MORTGAGEE PROTECTION
11,
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
11.1
11,2
11. 3
11. 4
11. 5
11. 6
11.7
11.8
11.9
11.10
11.11
11.12
11.13
1l.14
11.15
1l.l6
11. 17
11.18
11.19
11. 20
Recordation of Agreement
Entire Agreement . . . .
Severability. ...
Interpretation and Governing Law
Section Headings . . .. .
Singular and Plural . ..
Joint and Several Obligations
Time of Essence . . . . . .
Waiver. . . . . . . . . . .
No Third Party Beneficiaries
Force Majeure . . . .
Mutual Covenants . . .
Successors in Interest
Counterparts . . . . .
Jurisdiction and Venue
Project as a Private Undertaking .
Further Actions and Instruments
Eminent Domain . . . . . . .
Agent for Service of Process
Authority to Execute
Signatures. ........
Hi
PAGE
19
19
20
20
20
21
21
21
22
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
26
27
27
27
</,1/1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M
~
~
~
N
~
necessary. in accordance with the procedures established by law.
use its power of eminent domain to acquire such required real
property interests, OWNER shall pay all costs associated with
such acquisition or condemnation proceedings. This section 3.8
is not intended by the parties to impose upon the OWNER an
enforceable duty to acquire land or construct any public
improvements on land not owned by OWNER, except to the extent
that the OWNER elects to proceed with the development of the
Project, and then only in accordance with valid conditions
imposed by the COUNTY upon the development of the Project under
the Subdivision Map Act or other legal authority.
3.9 Requlation by Other Public Aqencies, It is
acknowledged by the parties that other pUblic agencies not within
the control of COUNTY possess authority to regulate aspects of
the development of the Property separately from or jointly with
COUNTY and this Agreement does not limit the authority of such
other pUblic agencies. For example, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66477 and Section 10.35 o~ Riverside County Ordinance No,
460, another local pUblic agency may provide local park and
recreation services and facilities and in that event, it is
permitted, and therefore shall be permitted by the parties. to
participate jointly with COUNTY to determine the location of land
to be dedicated or in lieu fees to be paid for local park
purposes, provided that COUNTY shall exercise its authority
subject to the terms of this Agreement.
3.10 Tentative Tract Map Extension. Notwithstanding the
provisions of Section 66452.6 of the Government Code. no
tentative subdivision map or tentative parcel map, heretofore or
hereafter approved in connection with development of the
Property, shall be granted an extension of time except in
accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations,
3.1l Vestinq Tentative Maps, If any tentative or final
subdivision map, or tentative or final parcel map, heretofore or
hereafter approved in connection with development of the
Property. is a vesting map under the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code Section 66410, ~ ~.) and Riverside County
Ordinance No. 460 and if this Agreement is determined by a final
judgment to be invalid or unenforceable insofar as it grants a
vested right to develop to OWNER, then and to that extent the
rights and protections afforded OWNER under the laws and
ordinances applicable to vesting maps shall supersede the
provisions of this Agreement. Except as set forth immediately
above, development of the Property shall occur only as provided
in this Agreement, and the provisions in this Agreement shall be
controlling over any conflicting provision of law or ordinance
concerning vesting maps.
4. PUBLIC BENEFITS.
4.1 Intent. The parties acknowledge and agree that
development of the Property will result in substantial pUblic
-14-
~
I
I
~
L":l
N
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'.
needs which will not be fully met by the Development Plan and
further acknowledge and agree that this Agreement confers
substantial private benefits on OWNER which should be balanced by
commensurate pUblic benefits. Accordingly, the parties intend to
provide consideration to the pUblic to balance the private
benefits conferred on OWNER by providing more fully for the
satisfaction of the pUblic needs resulting from the Project.
4.2 Public Facilities and Services Mitiqation Fee,
4.2.1 Amount and Components of Fee, OWNER
shall pay to COUNTY a pUblic facilities and services
mitigation fee in the total amount of $4277,00 for each
residential unit constructed on the Property. which fee
shall be comprised of the following components:
(a) PUblic Facilities Fee
$l89l per Residential
Unit
(b) Regional Parkland Fee
$350.00 per
Residential Unit with
$50.00 allocated for
recreational trails
(c) Habitat Conservation
and Open Space Land
Bank Fee
$260,00 per
Residential Unit
(d) Public Services
Offset Fee
$1776,00 per
Residential Unit
The amount of the public facilities and services
mitigation fee shall be adjusted annually as provided in
Subsection 4,2.4.
4.2.2 Time of Payment. The fees required
pursuant to Subsection 4.2,1 shall be paid to COUNTY
prior to the issuance of building permits for each
residential unit. No fees shall be payable for building
permits issued prior to the Effective Date of this
Agreement, but the fees required pursuant to Subsection
4.2.1 shall be paid prior to the re-issuance or extension
of any building permit for a residential unit for which
such fees have not previously been paid.
4.2.3 Reduction for Low-Occupancv Residential
Units. The fees required pursuant to Subsection 4.2,1
shall be reduced by 33.3 percent for low-occupancy
residential units. For the purposes of this Subsection.
low-occupancy residential units shall be limited to the
following:
(a) One bedroom and studio apartments (familY
rooms. dens, and any similar room shall be
considered to be bedrooms):
-15-
1--11\
-
I
l
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(b) Mobilehomes;
(c) Residential units in developments that
are legally restricted to occupancy by senior
citizens pursuant to Riverside County Ordinance No,
348 or state law.
4,2.4 Annual Fee Adiustment, The fees required
pursuant to SUbsection 4,2.1 shall be adjusted annually
during the term of this Agreement on the anniversary of
the Effective Date in accordance with the changes in the
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the Los
Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Area (hereinafter CPI)
published monthly by the U,S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics. The annual adjustment shall be calculated in
the following manner:
(a) Divide the CPI for month and year of the
Effective Date into the CPI for the month
immediately preceding the anniversary in which said
fees are to be adjusted.
(b) Multiply the quotient obtained by the
calculation in Paragraph (a) above times said fees,
(cl The result of the mUltiplication obtained
in Paragraph (b) above shall constitute the fees
payable during the succeeding year.
If the CPI specified herein is discontinued or revised
during the term of this Agreement, such other government
index or computation with which it is replaced shall be
used in order to obtain substantially the same result as
would have been obtained if the CPI had not been
discontinued.
In no event shall the fees be less than the fees set
forth in Subsection 4.2.1.
4.2.5 Credits. OWNER shall be entitled to
credit against the fees required pursuant to Subsection
4.2.1 for the dedication of land, the construction of
improvements or the payment of fees as specifically set
forth in Exhibit "E".
To the extent that Subsection 4.2.4 results in an
increase in the fees payable pursuant to 4.2.1(al, then
the credit provided in this Subsection for PUblic
Facilities as specified in Exhibit "E" shall be likewise
increased by the same percentage. No increase in the
credits set forth in Exhibit "E" shall be allowed for any
item which is not specifically identified as a Public
Facility Credit on Exhibit "E".
4.3 Continuation of Fees. Should all or any portion of
Property become part of a city or another county, the fees
payable pursuant to Section 4.2 shall remain and still be payable
to COUNTY on the following basis:
-16-
~
I
I
C"
~
IL~
L~
N
("j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(a) Fees under 4.2.1(a) shall be payable at the
rate of five and three tenths percent (5.3\) thereof to
COUNTY and the remainder to such city or other county.
(b) Fees payable under Subsections 4.2.I(b) and
(c) shall be fully payable to COUNTY,
(c) Fees under ~ubsection 4.2,l(d) shall be
payable at the rate of~one-third (1/3) thereof to such
city or other county and the remainder to COUNTY.
5. FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
If deemed appropriate. COUNTY and OWNER will cooperate in
the formation of any special assessment district, community
facilities district or alternate financing mechanism to pay for
the construction and/or maintenance and operation of pUblic
infrastructure facilities required as part of the Development
Plan. COUNTY also agrees that, to the extent any such district
or other financing entity is formed and sells bonds in order to
finance such reimbursements. OWNER may be reimbursed to the
extent that OWNER spends funds or dedicates land for the
establishment of public facilities. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, it is acknowiedged and agreed by the parties that
nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as
requiring COUNTY or the COUNTY Board of Supervisors to form any
such district or to issue and sell bonds.
6. REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE,
6.1 Periodic Review, The Planning Director shall
review this Agreement annually, on or before the anniversary of
the Effective Date. in order to ascertain the good faith
compliance by OWNER with the terms of the Agreement. OWNER shall
submit an Annual Monitoring Report, in a form acceptable to the
Planning Director. within 30 days after written notice from the
Planning Director. The Annual Monitoring Report shall be
accompanied by an annual review and administration fee sufficient
to defray the estimated costs of review and administration of the
Agreement during the succeeding year. The amount of the annual
review and administration fee shall be set annually by resolution
of the Board of Supervisors,
6.2 Special Review. The Board of Supervisors may order
a special review of compliance with this Agreement at any time,
The Planning Director shall conduct such special reviews.
6.3 Procedure.
(a) During either a periodic review or a special
review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good faith
compliance with the terms of the Agreement. The burden
of proof on this issue shall be on OWNER.
-17-
7fI.
1--~
af
3
(;~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I The Meadows
I at
Rancho California
I
-
Pauba ~~ 31.
14 331 ~ VTR
VTR I 32
~ 24134 ,24132
o ~ ~
~."1\ '':' '9 V~R
~r- 24133
2>" 1 7
rn \ 21
2 VTR 16
2413~ _
,
VTR
7 \ 24136
J
I
"
8
~
1
1
Bedford Properties
~
~ CJ{,obert CIJeil/., "William CJ7'bst al.c5lJssociar
- PROFESSIONAl ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SURVEYORS
I:::t 2055 SINGLE OAI< 0AlYf:. SUITE 250- AANCHOCAl.#ORHIA __
17141"~"AlIIl"'''I.J'W,.nC)
.JL
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
en
.....
9 5-
2TCC
@
~;I
@=-
@Q)
e.....
~ --
@ <
@ CD
@R)-I
...
a Q)
:::tJb>(")
Q) 5.....
.:<
j oZ
(") ...
::rio
o 1P
Q.
0:1\)
Q) i~
-CD
-.
0... !3. ......
Q
... ...".",.
j (!j \JtI
-. 3 .....
Q) i>>1~
"tJ
-
Q)
~
~
-.
~
CQ
)>
...
CD
Q)
(J)
N
CT
~
CA)
Ao
oIllo
r:
'.
j
[:
JI~
I:
<
<<
,<
.<
!:
r
i
"
I
r
i
"
"f
I. 'Ii
. I.
: I
.
, (
. .
11 I
..
11:
Hi l
11[ i -
:' [
. -.
'n
!~ 'il :
iWil-..;-jl
..11 '
I" '
hi'
"I
..
..
..
~:p
,."
p' p
~~,.
~;.~
r~
8
5
I
f
nIT
"
~,
R"
..
000
III
.,.
"I'
II
II
I'
II
!
.
~~
i'li';i;!~~1iiijil
i!111111 !~iUll
111'1" I"~II
I ..I
1"1'111111'
1!!i!IIIj'I
,ljl!lIlIPI
11"1 II
I I II
,
f
1
I
I
I
I'
~
"'illl
1'11i11'1
I III
Iii rill
~'''' I
1111!
1111
I J
i
'I
10
II
,.
'\
(
i
J
i
I
I'i
,!iJui
" i'iii
, II~
I I'
. iI"
! I'
I
I
J
,
I
I
J
.4lj
'If
!I
ill
IiI
Iii
"
./
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
o
Z
m
("l
.,
"
.Y,_; .
n....'.,
~ ~:~. '~'::<:
N
o
Z
m
("l
-
"j',:
~'t~',~~*.':.~~.7i
. ,.t;.:; ,~~~~.
>.... ,.' .
.....-.."'::...1.
'~"'~:"'"
. :. ~.)o. .
~F~~:
~.,. .~.a
"~i.'.
':_:'~~~~~J
,.c'
,
CD
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Staff Report
Vesting Tract Nos.
24130 Amended No. 1
24182 Amended No. 1
24184
24185 Amended No. 1
24186 Amended No. 3
24187 Amended No. 1
24188 Amended No. 1
Backqround
Specific Plan No. 219, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on October 4, 1988,
includes 5,611 dwelling units on 1389 acres. seven tracts Environmental Impact
Report No. 235 assessed the full range of environmental COncerns associated
with the Specific Plan. All identified potential impacts, except for
cumulative effects on air quality, were reduced to an acceptable level through
mitigation measures incorporated into the project, conditions of the approval
and project design. The environmental impact report is the basis for the
environmental assessments for the subject tracts. Environmental Assessment
Nos. 33595, 33641, 33699, 33697, 33642, 33594, and 33619 indicated that all
potential impacts for the tracts can be mitigated to an acceptable level.
Project Consistency with Adopted Specific Plan
A. Vesting Tract No. 24130 - The subject tract conforms to the SP zoning,
which relates to Planned Residential Development requirements under the R-3
Zone. The Elevations conform to the design guidelines for the Specific
Plan. The proposal is within the acceptable density as described in the
Specific Plan.
B. Vesting Tracts 24182, 24184-24188 - The subject tracts were reviewed for
consistency with adopted Specific Plan No. 219. The residential densities
and layout conform to the land Use Plan. The lots created will be able to
accommodate the zoning provisions of the zoning ordinance adopted in
conjunction with the Specific Plan. The vesting tract maps and
corresponding conditions of approval are consistent with the Plannin9 Area
Development Standards described in Section III. 8 of the Specific Plan,
A number of issues have been addressed at the design stage. Although some
of the issues are only specific to one tract, two points should be made
that apply to all of the subject tracts. All of the tracts needed to have
a slope stability report reviewed by the County Geologist. This has been
done. Secondly, a letter dated June I, 1989, has been submitted by the
applicant requesting waiver of the lot width to depth ratio as required in
Ordinance 460 Section 3.8 C for Vesting Tracts 24182, 24184, 24185, 24186,
24187 and 24188. The request is made due to topographic constraints and
site layout. Staff believes the waiver is necessary to comply with the
design requirements of the Specific Plan.
Other issues specific to individual tracts included internal circulation
and mitigation of historic resources. Firstly, although internal
4
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
Staff Report
Vesting Tract Nos.
24130 Amended No. 1
24182 Amended No. 1
24184
24185 Amended No. 1
24186 Amended No. 3
24187 Amended No. 1
24188 Amended No. 1
Other issues specific to individual tracts included internal circulation
and mitigation of historic resources. Firstly. although internal
circulation was discussed as an issue on several tracts. Tract 24186 was
the only major concern for the Fire Department. The layout of the paseo
and recreation area raised concerns for the Fire Department response time
to emergencies. The tract was amended to the satisfaction of the County
Fire Department. Secondly. the mitigation of historic resources was an
issue in Vesting Tract No. 24182. Part of the mitigation was to set aside
3.9 acres for preservation of a historic resource. as shown as Lot A on the
tract map. The applicant is currently completing additional studies as
requested by Parks Department to determine if additional mitigation is
required.
FINDINGS
1. Seven Vesting Tentative Tract Nos. 24130. 24182. 24184. 24185, 24186. 24187
and 24188 have been submitted.
2. The subject tracts are located entirely within adopted Specific Plan No.
219.
3. The seven vesting tracts have been designed to the development standards of
Adopted Specific Plan No. 219.
4. Environmental Assessment Nos. 33595. 33641. 33699. 33697. 33642. 33594. and
33619. based on the findings of Environmental Impact Report No. 235.
prepared for Specific Plan No. 219. indicate that the environmental impacts
can be avoided or mitigated to an acceptable level. except for cumulative
Air Quality impacts. which cannot be fully mitigated. ~ statement of
Overriding Findings for cumulative Air Quality impacts was approved by the
Board of Supervisors on October 4. 19B8.
5. Development Agreement No.4 has been recorded for Specific Plan No. 219.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposed tracts conform to Specific Plan No. 219.
2. The proposed vesting tracts conform to the requirements of Ordinance No.
348 and 460.
5
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Staff Report
Vesting Tract Nos.
24130 ~mended No. 1
24182 Amended No. 1
24184
24185 Amended No. 1
24186 Amended No. 3
24187 Amended No. 1
24188 Amended No. 1
3. 8ased On the environmental determination made in Environmental Assessment
Nos. 33595, 33641, 33699, 33697, 33642, 33594, and 33619, the subject
vesting tracts will not have a significant effect on the environment, with
the exception of cumulative Air Quality impacts which cannot be fully
mitigated. The above referenced Environmental Assessments include the
Statement of Overiding Findings for cumulative Air Quality impacts approved
by the 80ard of Supervisors on October 4, 1988.
RECOMMENDATION
ADOPTION of a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment Nos. 33595,
33641, 33699, 33697, 33642, 33594 and 33619 based on the finding that the
environmental impacts have been mitigated to an acceptable level through
project design and the conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24130 Amended No. I, subject to the
attached conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24182 Amended No. I, subject to the
attached conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24184, subject to the attached
conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24185 Amended No. I, subject to the
attached conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24186 Amended No.3, subject to the
attached conritions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24187 Amended No. I, subject to the
attached conditions of approval; and,
APPROVAL of Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24188 Amended No. I, subject to the
attached conditions of approval.
qt CO:gs
~
I
I
I
t
~
I
o
~
I
~
V1
t
~
~
~
f
~
>
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182
AMENDED NO. 1
STANDARD CONDITIONS
1. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of
Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or
proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or
employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County
of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body
concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24182 Amended No. 1 which action is
brought about within the time period provided for in California Government
Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the
subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of
Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fails to
promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or
fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the
County of Riverside.
2. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California
Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule
A, unless modified by the conditions listed below.
3. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
County of Riverside Board of Supervisors apprDval date, unless extended as
provided by Ordinance 460.
4. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all
the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and
Ordinance 460.
5. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside
County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Buildin9 and
Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
6. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of a
comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The
plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended
by Ordinance 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these
conditions of approval.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. II
Conditions of Approval
Page 2
7. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and
Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of county maintained
road right of way.
8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the
final map.
9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations
outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 5-10-89 a
copy of which is attached.
10. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a County maintained road.
11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall
continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such
offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of
the Road Commissioner.
12. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities,
utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and
conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County
Surveyor.
13. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance
with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's
letter dated 5-25-89 a copy of which is attached.
14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations
outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated
6-19-89 a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an
adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance
460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities
shall be collected by the Road Commissioner.
15. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations
outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 5-4-89 a copy of which
is attached.
16. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning
Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate
vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially
conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 3
17. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the
provisions of Development Agreement No. 4 and Specific Plan No. 219.
18. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
1) lots 1-275 shall be a minimum size of 4,000 square feet, Lots 276-443
shall be a minimum of 5,000 square feet.
2) Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional
area pursuant to Section 3.88 of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain
less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and
non-through lots.
3) Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of the Specific Plan zone.
4) Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
5) Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas, located in
recreation or commercial areas, shall be located away and visually
screened from surrounding areas with the use of block walls and
landscaping.
6) Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in
convenient locations to facilitate bike access to recreation or
commercial areas.
19. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit
written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department
that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval
letters from the following agencies have been met:
County Fire Department
County Flood Control
County Health Department
County Parks Department
b) A property owners' association with the unqualified right to assess the
owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs shall
be established and continuously maintained. The association shall have
the right to lien the property of the owners who default in the payment
of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any
encumbrance other than a first deed of trust provided such deed of
trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the
lien of the association.
~
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 4
20. Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall
submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review,
which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and
the Office of the County Counsel:
1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and
2) A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot
or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions
and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference.
The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for
review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide for
the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners
of each individual lot or unit, (c) provide for ownership of the common
area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each
individual lot or unit as tenants in common and (d) contain the following
provisions verbatim:
"Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary,
the following provision shall apply:
The property owners' association established herein shall manage and
continuously maintain the 'common area', more particularly described
as Lots A through U on Vesting Tract Map No. 24182 Amended No.1,
attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area', or
any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning
Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest.
The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the
owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of
maintaining the 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the
property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a
maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be
prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of
assessment or other document creating the assessment lien.
This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended or
property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the
Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's
successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered
'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the
'common a rea' .
In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles
of Incorporation, the Bylaws or the property owners' association Rules
and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall contro]."
,,/"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
;1
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 5
Once approved, the declaration
restrictions shall be recorded at
recorded.
of covenants, conditions and
the same time that the final map is
21. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions:
1) Prior to recordation of the final map the developer shall file an
application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a
parkway maintenance district for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 24182
Amended No.1 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance
district.
2) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County
Road and Planning Department. All landscaping and irrigation plans and
specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for
permanent filing with the County Road Department.
3) The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance
bonds, guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be
installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by
the district.
4) The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees,
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such
time as maintenance is taken over by the district.
5) The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits in Specific
Plan No. 219.
22. The backs of commercial buildings shall include mature landscaping so as
to be visually shielded from the adjoining property.
23 The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all
slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those
operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the
Planning Director.
24. Street lights shall be provided within the subdivision in accordance with
the standards of Ordinance 461 and the following:
1) Concurrently with the filing of subdivision improvement plans with the
Road Department, the developer shall secure approval of the proposed
street light layout first from the Road Department's traffic engineer
and then from the appropriate utility purveyor.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182, Amd. ill
Conditions of Approval
Page 6
2) Following approval Df the street lighting layout by the Road
Department's traffic engineer, the developer shall also file an
application with LAFCO for the formation of a street lighting district,
or annexation to an existing lighting district, unless the site is
within an existing lighting district.
3) Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall secure
conditional approval of the street lighting application from LAFCO,
unless the site is within an existing lighting district.
4) All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for
plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside
County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General
Plan.
25. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to
the Planning Department for review and apprDval. The approved ECS shall
be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning
Department and the Department of Building and Safety.
a. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints
Sheet: "County Slope Stabil ity Report No. 122 was prepared for this
property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.
Specific items of concern in the report are as follows: Slope
Stability."
26. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall comply
with Ordinance No. 663 by paying the fee required by that ordinance.
Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat
Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fees required by
Ordinance No. 633, the applicant shall pay the fee required under the
Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or
resolution.
b.
Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or
shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1)
Planning Director. Replacement trees shall
landscaping plans.
larger trunk diameters
basis as approved by the
be noted on approved
J:t..()
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182, Amd. '1
Conditions of Approval
Page 7
c. The following tree preservation guidelines shall be incorporated in the
projects approved grading, building and landscaping plans as
appropriate:
1. Every effort shall be made to prevent encroachment of structures,
grading or trenching within the dripline or twenty-five (25) feet
of the trunk of any trees, whichever is greater.
2. If encroachment within the dripline is unavoidable, no more than
one third of the root area shall be disturbed, graded or covered
with impervious materials. The root area is considered to extend
beyond the drip1ine a distance equal to one half the radius.
3. Building, grading or improvements shall not occur within ten (10)
feet of any tree trunk.
4. Retaining walls shall be constructed where necessary to preserve
natural grade at least one-half the distance between the trunk and
the drip1ine. Walls shall be designed with a post or caisson
footing rather than a continuous footing to minimize root damage.
5. Alteration of natural drainage shall be avoided to the greatest
extent possible.
6. Runoff channelled near trees shall not substantially change normal
soil moisture characteristics on a seasonal basis.
7. Runoff shall not be directed towards the base of trees so that the
base of the trees remain in wet soil for an extended period.
Where natural topography has been altered, drainage away from
trunks shall be provided where necessary to ensure that water will
not stand at the crown.
8. Sedimentation and siltation in the drainage ways shall be
controlled where necessary to avoid filling around the base of the
trees.
9. Land uses that would cause excessive soil compaction within the
drip1ine of trees shall be avoided. If the areas are planned for
recreation, provide trails to restrict compaction to a small area.
Heavy use under trees shall be avoided unless measures to minimize
compaction are undertaken.
10. Landscaping or irrigation shall not be installed within ten (10)
feet of any trees.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
I
II
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. II
Conditions of Approval
Page 8
d. All existing native specimen trees on the subject property shall be
preserved wherever feasible. Where they cannot be preserved they shall
be relocated or replaced with specimen trees as approved by the
Planning Director. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved
landscaping plans.
e. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading
permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the
Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline
for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of
development and shall include the following:
1. Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of
January through March
3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations
4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase
f. Driveways shall be designed so as not to exceed a fifteen (15) percent
grade.
g. Grading plans shall conform to Board adopted Hillside Development
Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations
thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by
an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benching) plan,
increased slope ratio (i.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope
planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a
fifteen percent grade.
h. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded
incorporating the following grading techniques:
1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect
the natural rounded terrain.
3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
l\..'V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 9
4) Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
hDrizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
i. The backs of commercial buildings shall include mature landscaping so
as to be visually shielded from the adjoining property.
j. Natural features such as water courses, specimen trees and significant
rock outcrops shall be protected in the siting of individual building
pads on final grading plans.
k. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent
off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that
slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by
the Director of Building and Safety.
1. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, a qualified paleontologist
shall be retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the
proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts.
Should the paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to
significant resources, a pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist
and the excavation and grading contractor shall be arranged. When
necessary, the paleontologist or representative shall have the
authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to
allow recovery of fossils.
27. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
1) The project shall comply with the requirements of Development
Agreement No.4.
2) Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety for residential lots backing up to secondary roadways or
wider roadways, an acoustical study shall be performed by an
acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that
shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision
to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn. (Amended-
Planning Commission - July 26, 1989).
3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects of the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited
to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual
front yard landscaping per the requirements of Specific Plan No. 219.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 10
4) All dwellings to be constructed within this subdivision shall be
designed and constructed with fire retardant (Class B) roofs as
approved by the County Fire Marshal.
5) Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval.
6) Roof-mounted equipment shall be shielded from view of surrounding
property.
7) Building separation between all buildings
fireplaces shall not be less than ten (10) feet.
Commission July 26, 1989)
4A€~Y84A~ excluding
(Amended by Planning
8) All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet.
9)
All front yards shall
irrigation.
be provided with landscaping and
automatic
10) Prior to the issuance of building permits detailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process, The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide
for the following:
1. Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation.
2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque
up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity.
3. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
4. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to
prDvide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area
of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth berming,
ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with
meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where
appropriate as approved by the Planning Department.
5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I I
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 11
6. Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road
right-of-way.
7. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
8. All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on
the subject property shall be shown on the project's grading plans
and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained.
9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked.
10. The plans shall conform to those shown in Specific Plan 219.
28. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
1) Wall and/or fence locations and materials shall conform to the
approved wall and fence treatment plan in Specific Plan No. 219.
2) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If
seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and
erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning
Director and the Director of 8uilding and Safety.
3) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by a Planning Department field
inspection.
4) NDt withstanding the preceding conditions. wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
5) Concrete sidewal ks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461 and Specific Plan No.
219.
6) Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance
with the standards of Ordinance 460 and Specific Plan No. 219.
29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the subdivider shall prepare
and submit a written report to the Planning Director of the County of
Riverside demonstrating compliance with those conditions of approval and
I'
b..--:J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:,1
I
i
\1
I
:1
I
:-
:1
:.
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24182. Amd. #1
Conditions of Approval
Page 12
mitigation measures of this map and E.A. No. 33641 which must be satisfied
prior to the issuance of a building permit.
The Planning Director may require inspection or other monitoring to assure
such compliance.
CO:gs
~~
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
CHII!tF ENGINEER
188S MARKET STREET
P. O. BOX t033
TELEPHONE (714l 787.,zOlS
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 82502
June 19, 1989
fDJ ~ fa ~ U ~g [ IlIrrr!!\
1ffi JUN 2 2 '1~89 WJ
Riverside County
Planning Department
County Administrative Center
Riverside, California
RIVERSIGE CO:!NF'
PlA~'!Nf;',!G DEpt\:.~... .=..~.
Attention: Specific Plan Team
Chris Ormsby
Re: Vesting Tract 24182
Amended Map No. 1
This is a proposal to divide 136.2 acres for single family hous-
ing and commercial sites in the Temecula Valley area. The proj-
ect is located within Specific Plan 219 at the southwest corner
of De Portola Road and Butterfield Stage Road.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
This tract is one of many proposed within "the Meadows" Specific
Plan. It is important that the development of this property be
coordinated with the development of adjacent properties to ensure
that the drainage concept for the overall specific plan is main-
tained as approved.
Assessment District 159 proposes to construct a major roadway and
both interim and ultimate drainage improvements in the area.
Where these facilities affect this project, they should either be
incorporated into the drainage improvements for the project or
replaced by equivalent facilities.
Flows from a large watershed approach this site from the east.
Neither the tentative map nor the assessment district addresses
how these flows would be handled. The specific plan shows that
these flows would be intercepted by an offsite open channel and
conveyed to Temecula Creek. Such a facility is necessary for the
construction of this tract.
The tract must be protected from all tributary offsite flows. If
providing this protection results in the project being rede-
signed, it must be resubmitted for agency review.
Following are the District's recommendations:
1. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right
of way should be contained within drainage easements
shown on the final map. A note should be added to the
final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free
of buildings and obstructions".
~<\
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Vesting Tract 24182
Amended Map No. 1
- 2 -
June 19, 1989
2. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within
publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the
affected property owners. The documents should be re-
corded and a copy submitted to the District prior to
recordation of the final map.
3. All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street
or an adequate outlet.
4.
The 10 year storm flow should be
curb and the 100 year storm flow
within the street right of way.
criteria is exceeded, additional
should be installed.
contained within the
should be contained
When either of these
drainage facilities
5. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be
designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows.
Additional emergency escape should also be provided.
6. The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area
and outlet points.
7. Development of this property should be coordinated with
the development of adjacent properties to ensure that
watercourses remain unobstructed and stormwaters are not
diverted from one watershed to another. This may require
the construction of temporary drainage facilities or off-
site construction and grading.
8. The property's street and lot grading should be designed
in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural
drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage
area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a
drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
9. Major flood control facilities are being proposed. These
should be designed and constructed to District standards
including those related to alignment and access to both
inlets and outlets. The applicant should consult the
District early in the design process regarding materials,
hydraulic design and transfer of rights of way.
t>,fb
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Riverside County
Planning Department
Re: Vesting Tract 24182
Amended Map No. 1
- 3 -
June 19, 1989
10. Flows tributary to the site from the east must be col-
lected and safely conveyed to an adequate outlet. The
specific plan shows that an open channel would intercept
these flows and carry them south across the highway to
Temecula Creek.
'1. A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected
property owners for the release of concentrated or di-
verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage
easement should be submitted to the District for review
prior to the recordation of the final map.
12. If the tract is built in phases, each phase shall be pro-
tected from the 1 in 100 year tributary storm flows.
13. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented
immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition
of debris onto downstream properties or drainage
facilities.
14. This tract should not be recorded until construction has
begun for the 120 inch storm drain proposed in Butter-
field Stage Road by Assessment District 159.
15. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final
map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal-
culations should be submitted to the District via the
Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda-
tion of the final map. Grading plans should be approved
prior to issuance of grading permits.
Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Zully Smith
of this office at 714/787-2333.
c: Robert Bein, William Frost &
" ill 'zr'
HN H. /~A
enior Civil Engineer
ZS:bjp
/>.,0-..
..... - ...
:!U~l!I:!l:Vc!~C! DU!UUV1c!
n:!Uno) ~C!!(I:!Jt It:
I I I "'''uu~ Ld ^4~W"'U' f..\4J :y3 0NRNd3W CWINOStBof ~ 3IWN
sa ~ lJadoJd pJo~paB =3IWN s.1NWOI1ddV
Z8It>Z 'oN peJ1 a^nl1lUa1 5u~lSa^ :(SlsH38wnN ON\' c.a...u 3SV:) ~'OtW
6It :(slta8r4nN 31n00r4 It>9EE :H38r4nN (Y3) .1lGr4S..~~ 1\'~
NOu.Vn1VA3 aYVaNV~S :WYO:l J.NiWSSiSSY 1V.1N3INNOYlAfS
..
'lJI1Jl a4l u~4l~M paleJol aJe sal~s J~JOlS~4 OM1 'lueJe^ ^l~Jew~Jd s~ al~s
"'u ~ 'j- ^"'I' U""'l "^~4 4"f4M ~llf4 DUHLO.A ~D ^UJl1w~Ja slS~SUOJ aHs a41
:S~NlaNnOl:ll:lnS SlI aNY 3lJS l.:mOl:ld 3Hl. :JO !lNIll3S 1Vl.N3WNOl:lIAN3 !lNl.LSlX3 3H1 :JO NOUdftiOS3(J :l3ll:l8 'H
MZ aoul111 S8 Q~4SUM01
91 uo~pas :NOI.lclIHOS30 1V~31 .., HOVllV HO NOI.lcllHOS30 3~NVY 'dIHSNMO.1 'NOU03S '9
'6IZ 'aN Ul1ld J~~~Jads ~o JaUJoJ lsea4lnos a4l u~
s~ II '6L ^eM40~H ~o 4lJOU ^lale~paww~ pall1Jol s~ al~s a41 :S30N3tf3:i:1Y !331:l1S ':I
L30N'fflHO:JNOO Nl '1VSOcIOl:lcl 3H.L SI :~NIN6z 03SOcIOtW "3
^ L30N'fflI:iO:JNOO NI TfSOdOl:lcl 3H.L SI dS :fJNINOZ SNIlSIX3 '0
17LU 'EIO-OEI-9Z6 :(S)'ON 1301Nd S.l:tOSS3SSY ":J
J.33:J 3liVnos JO . G YE L S3HOY :v3W J:)3I'O~ 1\'.1Ol 11
'Slol t>t>t> OlU~ saJJe Z'9E! sap~^~p
LesoaoJa a41 :(8t~ldc18 ft S8SlI puv 8ZJW 101 wnWlUIW pllIadoJd epIlIOl4) NClJdlH0S30 ~
NOU.YW1:IO~NI .1~3roYcl 1
'11\ puv ^ '(.<t1.lO 3 puw '8 'V) H 'III SlIOll?8S 8\8IlIWOO '8MIqe
pauOlluew eso41 U8Ill J8410 U01l1lU6188P uo!l-UOO puv eollds ued() uw ftIl au-108l0Jd -.10 ~ JO 11'I 0
oC;
'-J . 11\ ... ^ '(.(juD 0 pile B 'VI
^I 'III suo,P8S 8181dwoo 'ue:llldS ued() n pe11lU61S8(J ION SUJV.. III " au- 108l0Jd 81810 IJ'lId JO" []
11\ puw ^ '('<11.10 ::I puv a> H 'In suag:l8S ~ '.~ kI!JOd
A1lunwwoo s86eu,^ OIj:lU'llH.. JO "dVW3H.. ,,'SU'lllcI :l!j!:ledS peldopv. III " 8118 PIfoJd .. 10 IJ'lId JO IV Ia
'.<t6uIPJO:Xl'l peeowd pllff MopICI (s)uoado ~...... ... l(OIRO
NOI.LVNOIS3Q NOI.LV^Y3SNO~ aNY 3~"'dS N3dO NY'1d '1W3N3~fiNsN3H3I:1dW03 ..
L
--.
.1NlIWSSllSSY slI:)ynony aNY SGWZYH 1Y.lIGIINOYING ..
'(elled 11'11 JOIIlOllOClIW'UOfllulI8P MSl '(t)8ugwJ Allaqtldllaclt 8tlOU JO ~-IMI"''''''-llIlIlPlP
'pejr.l!PUlIJ8llM 'Olll't '^ UO!I:l8S Japun __ UO!Itfl!llW'<ut put ~JlI tflulJlUY 'peq- "Pl,..,.-....-tlllP~
811JM W sa.< Jl8l1J1lW 8llft! .<ut JO:f 'UllId itJeueo MjtU8ljllJdwoQ MAUl peuJtlUllO .. tlll/llly ; Il -~.. 'fN '~... llIlI,(q
Jl8l:l8l1teq JO I:l8Jjt '<R\Jr.lIJlulltt.<tU1 ~ 8ClJ_ JCl/PUW IlJtZtIl JWlI*Il~.<ut ........lMClUJOw._... ~ '8'
I ~S!lI ~-IW\WON I I >tS!lI lIDlH-1tUIJON I ~ I.:l!lIO ~,.. ~ IIIN . 'iN
'8'111 uo!l=>>S Ul seull" Alll!qtlJnt lI8IIllutI8It!JdOlddt llIlIlIU!\W8l8P ClJ,(,_~1 *''' UI!I ''OM I!lIL '(IU() 8Plr.)) E'1A
8Jnet~ ulI1d I1lJllU8g 8A!suall8ldWOO UI putlOI sa SUOJIdjl:lt8p llIlI WClJj P8UlWJlI18P sa"" PU8I P-""""'llIlI JO"""" 8\D.pllI V
SOYYZVH
(lrlA '''w .. n 8
U'L\ .&.., S\I!lIIClPOCY -W L L
(L'IA '''w ftIV uoppunUf WWCJ -OL
^
(t9t> '11I0 t Z-"L ":IllS '09..1110
. L 'lA '.,~) PU-IS , Ull!9O&I3 IlU!M ""1f8
(s.<MinS IJOS 8O!^l8S
UO!lVAl"UOO IJOS vas'n) ~ -;-9
(s.<aA.Ins IIOS ~ UCI!1VA.ll1l111CY.)
IIOS yO'S'n) IlIOS 811!$utdq N L
(UOIlO8dSUI 8IIt-UO) PaztH ~l\OClY ""1f'9
(S'lA '.,,~ .. n Sd S 8
(uog:l8dCulllllW-UO JO sd8W :J!WSt8S
8rq 009 '00 'A!l:U auoz ...... 8PlJSllW1 N~
(sdvW adolS lI\80S 009 '00 '^!l:U S8dCtS A"
(S'IA 'll!~ It n ScI. @ 'lINg..lo
(L'IA III:J} auoz ~U/lCl.J9'g uE
("'lA '.,..., It n ScI S WI
(L'lA '.,~) auoz /8!lU8IllloI ~ ~
(t'1A 'llW y n ScI 8
(L 11\ 'Of.IJ 8IOZ plIDH
11M:! .<i&InOO JO lI8!IlfllS (8(Q8lfS CIlCllld-II!nDIW NL
J8'11O - '5'"
J8'11O - '.....
(Lt'1A . Ot'lA ,.".:1) I8JV al~ snoPJ1lZ8H T 1:...
s81S8M pue SI81J81ew snoPJ1lZ8H N.......
'<I!leno J818M 01 ,^!p'sues j:)8fO.lcl T'L'"
j:)8fOJd wOJ:! $l:ledwl '<P.l8nO J8leM JL '0'"
Alll8nO JIV 01 8A!1!Sues ~rOJd N '8 L
i:lafOJd WOJ:! Sllledwl IIllleno JIV T '9L
(L L'lA '.,~) I:la!OJd ,^!p'sues "ION A'LL
(L L'lA '''I:!) -n '^!l!sues "ION
"u!l:lauv 8S!ON paleJauaO 1:l8!0Jd N'SL
(LL'lA '''!.:I) a :I S V 'iN
8S!ON "'110 - - '5 L
(LL'lA 'Il!:!) a :I S v e
(6Z'lA' L1'lA 'Ill:!) "ION .<eMll8!H N '..L
(LL'lA 'Il!:!) a :I S v ~
(SL'lA.e:L'lA'Il'.:I)"!ONP8OJ~ T'EL
(LL'lA 'Ilw a :I S v 8
('S':!YW 'llOclal:l zn:llV "In t "'1'IA'
L L'8L'II'5'8L'II''''..:IlllSJON \JOdIIV N 'n
1rK:
g
N
S3~YnOS:UI
(WlA . EYL\ -eI:J) 1lIC1IIlO88II.QI18U3
(......IA. L "'IA '81'" ~nD88tt I8JIIU!J'I
(on\' 8t'11\'~ .~
lLE'1A .lln\ -e.:fl IJIIPI!M
(SCMW~
IJO!lftJ8AUClO PW'1 ~.oo..,
8J\JlIlI8Jd I8JIl\lIlO!J8li .,. J88N JO III N a:
(m.\' WIA 1lY~ J:'"H
N"'LC
Nee
N"
AU
-sc
N
J8IllO
JlIIllO
(d'lIw S8:lJnos81:118:l!1lo1OlU0818cj)
S8Olnosal:ll8:l!IloIOlU08Jlld
(lll>'lA . S"'lA , EE'lA . ~e:'1A 'Il~)
S8ClJnosal:ll8:l!IloJ08ell:lJV
(EE'lA . ~E'IA 'Il~) ~nosal:l :l\JOIS!H
(5..'1A '.,~) 8.<8Mllll!H :l\uq
-LE
-9&
pe6eJ~!a "n PU1I"l . a 81q8lC!9:l:l8Un '<U8J8Ue9 . 0 ~.<uvuoII!Puoo - B
alqlllda:lOV '<lIeJ8U80 . v pej:lfJl18l:t . .. "'l". _...un ~ - n
\$ 9lq811nS '<1I8UOISIAOJd . ScI 81qqnS '<1I8Jeuea - S "N~ ION . VN
sSUl18Y ,(IIIIQ8ldaooy aSloN PU8 A4mQ8l1ns asn pu., JOJ SUOfHUUea
"".;,
S<lA :u!8Idxe 'lOU II LU'8ld ~ 8J\!SU8Il8JdWO:) 8IA \IllM IU8lSlsUOO l''''I'1lMlI Puw
'luawnoop el8!JdOJdcle 9IA jO SUOll1lU81S8p puv Sll!:l!JOd 8ID 4llM lUll\SJSUOO i1lSOdOJd 8l# S1'~ Ill!l/Ill Sill uo JlllS1I8 "Z
'6ll 'oN ueLd J~~~J<ldS p<l+dop~
:(8JuoR'IU8!seP esn J'U8l1U8A8l8l8l# 8I8IS 'a.
:8U!M01I01 8l# el8Jdwoo puv '18SOdOJd 8l# OJ 8U!o<1dd1l eepljOd oypeds 8IA IlVlllP III Mey.lU '..-sy
'<:l!1Od .<!Iunwwoo se88U,^ ~ JO ..dVW3tf. 'uSU8lcl :lIPIdS Jl8ldOW. III pIlnll " Pl!OId 8IA " II8d JO ... ':)
JllIAO ~Ll (C2'^,.el'^,-&.:l)~PUW~ -r--
-IIUJ jO 8l8IldS.<!IO Nil (Sl'^,' Ll'^, '8l:I) 8IWM P!JOS 'T"'8
-1l8J8daId J8lS8IIQ TSl (Sl'^,' Ll'^, '8l:I) IfOOIr.IS Tl.
(W^,' JZ^,' Ol '8lll- 8'8l'g (Sl'^, - Ll'^, IY I8ClIN8S IlI*IS /:II
',,"Sl'U - irSl'II'8l:1l SllOdl!Y TVl (Sl'^, - 9l'^, -&.:l) 18O!^I8S...", '"'A'S
(SI'^, . L I'^, '8!:!) sacl!^lllS llll88H Ae I (1J8P'1.<ouelly) JaMeS -;r.
(SI'^,'Ll'^,'8!:!)Sll!JV.Iqn r1:1 (lll8Il8'1 klu8Dy) .I8l8M At=
(91:"^,. Sir^' '8!:!) Se!lll!ltl Tll (el'^, -1:I'^, '8l:I) spI~ 8l!8 ""NZ
(sclew 1\1U.!. U8!JjSanb3 8180S 008 '00 '^!t! (8plIOt! palI"bllt! , PlUUVld 'llu!lSlX3 ^ 'OIlS
Il>ir ^' . ai'^, 'Il!:!) Slilll.!. UVlJIs;mb3 NO I UI SII1OS!Q 'II'N-I'^, 'llt.:l> UO!l8JllOl!:l AL
SiOI^Y3S ONY S3u.nIOW onsllcl
'^ UOl~ J&pun S8Jnseew UOlletl!l/W puv ~J jO s8UIPUY 'pel/nsuoo satouelle 'S8:l.InOll!l'P 8l!JM 'W ~ pelIIeIlI
8tISli1'<UV JO,l 'lJe1d 1Ill-o 8J\jSulI4aJdWOO 9IA Uf peUllllUOO llJV Sliney peouI.MIJ'" IIV 'I1lSOdOJd ll4l,(q pe~lI1l eq JO
lO8>>8 '<1lur.MJlu8!S'<ew senSSI SIO!l\.Ias JO/puv S8!l!IlOVJ ::luqnd.<uv J9lA8ljN\ IN) au JO W sa.< 8 \IllM '18::lP!1II ~ 1111.10.::1 11
'S<l~+~L~Je~ LOJ+uOJ
pooL~ pue 'W<l+S^S J<lM<lS 'SL004JS 6U~p~AOJd 0+ pJe6<lJ 4+~M ^LLe~J<lds<l 'S<lJ~AJ<lS
J~Lqnd ~o uO~s~AOJd <l4+ <lJe <lJue+Jodw~ JeLnJ~+Jed ~o s<lnssI 'SEl 'ON liB
u~ p<lq~JJS<lp s~ uo~+e6~+~w p<lsodoJd <l41 '6ll 'oN ueLd J~~~J<ldS u~ p<lu~e+uoJ
<lJe +J<lrOJd <l4+ bupJ<lHe S<lP~LOd <l41 =1VSOdOI:lclONl103:I:IVS3IOl1Od.:lOA~ 'l.
:J.HY :II '(slNOu.YNOIS3O NV1d A.I.INt1WWCX) ,.
(~d+dup~ +uu U~LQ) ueLd ea~v lSuM4+nus :J.HY :II'NV1d .AJJNnwWOO '9
S<l~J~LOd 6u~+46~1 +<l<lJ+S ^Jo+eAJ<lsqo JewoLed '+W :J.HY :II 'V3l:IV AOnOd A1INIlWWOO ...
:J.HY .:I 'V3l:ft8l1S 'E
e<lJ~ Du~uueLd <lSn puel ^Jo+~JJa1 +S<lM4+noS :v3W ONINNY'ld 3Srl 0NV1 "Z
6lZ 'oN ueLd J~~~J<ldS p<l+doPV ,(S)NOUYNOlS3<J dW1I NOUV1J:l3SNOO (]NY 3:lVdS N3dO 'a.
u'n8IV.<::l!ICld~~
0II::lU8Y.. JO ,.d'ffl3Yo. 'uSU8lcl :lYIJ8dS PIldopy. III ~''''JOt III a:l8faJd 8IA S88lUI'I '* 8l4l8llldwOO V
NOU....,........,=w'I 3sn CINY1 'AI
, -
-... ..-.- --
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
I
I
I
.
I
.
I
'.
.
'I
.
~5t
,SllfOllalSJSUOOUl 8u~U8PI sans&! 8SOI# J8qIIlnN lIMII Puw IJCl!108S iq 101........ 'IOU .
LU1!IcI l8lauag &.\!SU8lj8JdUlCl:) 8Ill lAIM IU8SlSUOO JesodoJd 8Ill II ',(pI1IlI IIIIUI 11'II uo pang l:
:\ll1IldXe 'IOU II l,(I)uoR8UfItsap ... lIIIM ~ IftOCIl:ud ... II ~
:(1~"9"~ lIIIlIIl8 '"
:lIUlMOIIOJ 8Ill 81llldWOO 'UO!lllUllt88P \lCl!I8^MUO:) pua eoedS U8d() UI ~ II 8IIS PIfOIIIlIII P lJIIIf 10 ... '3
:s8PU8lll!SUOOUlll~U8PI sanstl! 8SOI# JIIClWl'IN 8Il8llI Puw '1Ol108S iq 101...... 'IOU .
LU1!IcI I8lllUaa &.\!SU8llaJdUlCl:) 8IllllllM IU8Ill!IUOO JesodoJd ... II .~ II!IUIINI uo pang 'L
:\l!1IdX8 'IOU .
LSesn PU81 lIU!Puno.uns pasodoJd pue lIUllS!Xe 4IIM aIQ!l8dwO:) (VSOdold 813 II '9
,
:IJI8ldXe 'IOU II
LUVJd .<ilunwUlCl:) 8Ill1O SUO!lllUlIl88P pus S8!O!JOd 8IlllAlM IU81S!IUOO pafaJd pesodoJd III Sf -g
:(sJuo!I1IIllI!SaP U8Id -<ilunWWOO '.,
:U!l!ld1l3 L&elllS lUawclO\8/\8P III ~ P8^IOI8I aq a.1VJI!P .. DIM 'Z'O lIIG4 SIIJlIP L'O If 1t
(~ '\lIP-'''''' '\8!11-1-,... ....
~ asn PU8I IIlllO!P\lI OSJV '9UO!llPUOO lIulISld uo peaq IllS .. q (..~.., -- pu8I lUlIIJIlO
~
(~ 'IIP.III"""'" 'I8IIlJIIlII8I VJt
~ llSl'I PU8I 81&::l!P\lI 0llIY lOIfa,Id pesoda.Id III jJOddnI at ". i:.e.l ~.... esn IlW1 '1.
'U8Id .<ilunwwoo e UI Slllll J. pus 9 'g '., suogsanb lIlllIdwOO 'J. p.- .. ~ ~ '1. ~Ib
IIlllldwoo 'U8Id .<ilunwWOO . U1IOUSI pus 'NaoedS U8d() n P8J8UlItsea IOU ftlIlV. UI SI. PlIOJd .. to aIlId.lO", '0
(pemlAllOO) NOUYUIIIJ-I~ iStI aNY'I 'M
\fj
'aJu~u~pJO ^lunoJ ^q.paJ~nbaJ s~ S~41 'as~4d
uO~lJnJlsuOJ a4l DU~Jnp uo~soJa lUaAaJd Ol pap~AOJd aq ll~M JaAOJpunoJ5
^J~Jodwal 'UO~lJ~JS~l~S s~4 Ol ls~50loa9 '^lUnoJ a4l ^q paMa~AaJ aq Ol
pu~ SlU~llnsuoJ aSJaAUOJ^q palaldwoJ lJoda..l ^lH~q~ls adols ~ u~ paq~JJsap
uaaq s~4 uo~soJa JOJ l~~lualod a41 '6IZ 'oN u~ld J~J~Jads JO 9 'V III
UO~lJas u~ pau~llno SPJ~PU~lS luawdolaAaa ^q pal~5~l~W s~ aJu~J~add~ l~ns~A
JO lJ~dw~ l~~lualod a41 '^l~l~q~lsu~ adols alq~ssod pu~ SadolS palJalOJdun
JO uo~soJa aJaAaS 'sWJoJ pU~l paJall~ ^llUau~WJad JO aJu~J~add~ l~ns~A
a4l apnlJu~ uo~soJa pu~ sadols Ol pal~laJ SlJ~dw~ lU~J~J~u5~s l~~lualod 8'~ 'S '^I
'saJu~u~pJO
AlunoJ pu~ apoJ 6u~Pl~ns WJoJ~un a4l 4l~M aJu~WJoJUOJ 45noJ4l laAal
al4~~daJJe ue Ol paleO~l~W aq ueJ SlJeaw~ le~lualOd 'alqel~ns S~ l~~lualod
5u~~e4SpunoJ5 JOJ ^l~l~q~l~ns asn puel JOJ uO~leu5~sap u~ld l~Jaua9 a41 ('S III
:S3l:tnS'(3~ NOI.LVtlIJ.l~ '.LOV:I :10 StlNIONI:I'03.L1nSNOO S310N30V 'S30l:tnOS 'ON 30SSI
INO~3S
'Sl88IlS ~ a:leU 814
40e)l1l pUll UO!loas llIU 10 pUll alA III xoq lIIllll::MIlp 'uo!l:l" SIIA alll\dwoo Ol pepMU 8.111 SINC/W tBUO!llPPllll '9
"fI UCl!1::MIsqns
Ol Jal8.1 'palll\dWOO aq U1IO luewSSlIss. I8JUlIWUOJ!^UlI atD 8.IOjaq ptJlnbal II uon8WJOJIlI .-uo!lIPpll II .~
('l:tT3) lJodaJ l:lldWI IVlU8WUOJIAUlI UlIl1ulJ!nbal 1lI01lllM lI\Qe1J1lu8PIII'sam- UOflell!llw ~s 8lVlS 1:
'sweouoo 11IlU8WUOJIAUlI lIulpaea. l:l8J JO slIU!PU!IlIlI 8llllS ~
'P811nSUOO SlIjOU8llll lIu!pnpuf 'S8OJnos 8l1IP IUllAlI\eJ 11IUOI!PPll 1I11l8l1 'l
:MOfaq UMOll8 n 11lWJCll8lll III 'lIlJ1MOflCf
8l!l OP pUll Jaqwnu 8I1SSJ pUll UOflO8S atD ~11U8111 'S' ^' pUll 8'111 SUOIlO8S Jepun W sa.( pt~ anstII 40n JO:I '8
l3J.YO'OWS3.\l O:W3:l3l:1 03J.S31lO3l:1 03l:1ItlO3l:t 'ON 3IlSSt
NCltJ.mI'jtBI3Q NOUVr-lIlO.:lNl Nouml104.. NOUWll:lO:lNl INOU:)3S
A:lVn03OY 3.l.VQ 3.l.va
:03E1d~OO 38 NY:) .LN3WSS3SSV 1V.LN3~NOl:IIAN3 3~:l38 O3YIOO3Y NOU.VW~ 1VNOWaov "fI
Sil:lnSYaW NOlJ.VOWW aNY .L:)W :10 SONICJNI:I S30l:lnGS NOLLYWl:IO.. 'A
~ .....;-... c
7U;l'.J it If tU'J~)~ ~j ~f,"vlj r;1~' 'Iff p -
ItJ I? (j f?'7) , f' M YO uO,/-~.1j.
:pv--l.j. ?ftf 1(/ "d.f'P Iff;/ 'IvY/oj iJ'/i9 'iP!j s-nr/lI05'}..) r?:riaJs.1/ reg 'f! ']!I.
'SfZ 'ON 'M'I.3 u~ passnJs~p AL46no~04+ s~ Ma~^a~ Le+uawuo~~^ua 6u~puodsa~~oJ SI - tI
'6IZ 'ON ueLd J~~~JadS u~ passa~ppe pue passnJs~p uaaq a^e4 sanss~ a41 vTI'8'AI
'a+~s +Je~+ a4+ uo sa~Jads a4+ pu~~ 0+ paL~e~
SE2 'ON 'H.I'3 JO~ pa~eda~d luawssasse LeJ~60Lofq V '+e+fQe4 leH 00~e6ue~
,sua4da+s pa+sfL ALLe~apad a4+ ~o a6ue~ J~~O+S~4 a4+ U~4+~M sf a+~s a41 8Z .S'III
'SEZ 'ON "M'I'3 ~o s~sALeue a4+ uo paseq
a~n+LnJ~~be ~O~ aLqe+~ns sL~oS se4 a+~s a4+ ~o uo~+~oa LLews e 4on04+LV 'j(, tl III
.6IZ .ON ueLd J~~~Jads ~O~ Le^o~dde ~o uo~+nLosa~ a4+ u~ ,(+~Lenb ~~e uo
s+Ja~~a a^~+eLnwnJ a4+ ~O~ apew seM s5u~pu~~ bu~p~~~a^o ~o +uawa+e+s v 81 .S.III
'pa~~nba~
aq LL~M 6u~+~oda~ pue 6u~~0+~uoW 'Apn+s LeJ~+snoJe a4+ ,(q pau~w~a+ap
sLLeM pa~~nba~ ~o +46~a4 a4+ 6u~u~wua+ap apnLJu~ LL~M 4J~4M pll~ Ldde
aq LLe4s sa~nseaw uo~+e6~+~w 'sAeMpeo~ ~ap~M ~o A~epUOJas 0+ +uaJerpe
sea~e ~o~ sl~wuad 6u~PL~nq ~o aJuenss~ a4l Ol ~o~~d palaLdwoJ aq Ol a~e
safpn+s aSfoN 'a^~l~SUas as~ou se paZ~~alJe~~4J a~~ sasn L~~luap~sa~ a41 LI '8'III
(.SIE .d v .ON J uOflJaS) SE2 'ON MI3
u~ paq~~Jsap sa~nseaw 6u~sn pa+e6f+fw aq U~J SlJedw~ pooL~ Lef+ua+od AUV 01 '8'III
:S3~nsV3W NOU,VOWW 'J.Ov~ .:10 SONIONl:I '03J.1nsNOO S3ION30V 'S30l:UlOS 'ON 3/'lSSI
INOtJ.:)3S
(penulJuool S3ynSViW NO/J.YOWW aNY .L:)Y:f :10 SONia..... 'S301Ul0S NO/J.YWYO:IM 'A
:NO/J.YNIWY3J.30 J.OYdWl 1Y.LN3WNOYIMG '1.\
'peJjnbel "
11 8A~ ,(1l\U J:l8f0Jd 8l/J. []
(Jell
'pemf8Jd eq ,(vw UOl111lvr,le(J 8An~ 11 puw J:l8(aJd
8111 01 pS!ldd1l uaaq 8^~ ^ UOl~ UJ peq~ap samnIW UO!lIlll!lIW IIlI lISIIlII:)lICI lIS1lO ifill III PIP
1~I!u6IS 11 aq IOU 11IM 8J8IlI 'J8^SMOIl ~II8WUOJ,^U8 8\A UO ):)8118 lU8Oy!ul!t1 11 8A~ Plnoo J:I8{oJd 8l/J. []
(JO)
'pemfaJd
aq Alw UOnIJ8I:l8Q lMllelleN 11 PU1I lUIWUOJI^U8 8\A UO ):)8118 11l1lOWul!t1 . ~ IOU IUM J:l8f0Jd 8l/J. EJ
llodSt:I t:ledwl l1!lu8WUOJ!^U3
:;/Yf
bs. f ~ :811,
rp
(lillI_at....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ITEM #15
T~ '2L4lE?3
1'>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
en
r+
9 5-
2fCC
@
, ~
~(I)
@a
@Q)
er+
~ --
@<
_@ (I)
@'i)-f
C>> -.
... Q)
~~n
C>> 5 r+
t<
::JeZ
n ;
::T :C' 0
o ~.
c:
o .CD
C>> ~ I\)
-S'~
=he
o n...a.
.""'t ~ Q)
.... ....
~ e .
01 -. 3 ,-,
C>> pi' VIttI
~
i
f
. . . .
illl"I'fllllH!i'
II 1I1"I'I'OjI
!I I'lll:',i,i,l'iI,!H
"I II'('!'
Ii 11!;,'I,:j .,I",,'II!
'p lif i ,'II,
h111lijllj"I,lj,
ill!li"iltU,I'11
.
i
.
~
.
;
!
.
I
i
:.-."
3-
CDS>>
a~
CD~
a.._.
(3:~
I~CC
~)>
. ...
N(I)
S>>
I'
,I
I'
,I
j;
,I
II
,
~"
" I i ~
r'
i i
l'li!!
"'1
":1. /
I ." r---r
I ' ~
! M~
r?ii~,
WH'-;, ,fit
c:.11'.f
.-,.~.:-~
~
iff ~
,
ii:il;ji!iI';jjjiii
",!!!II!1 :.lllIili:
"I"! '11'"
pli III 'I!~IW
l:i i'IIIIII"
ffi,III'"
",11:11'11,
III 1'1
11111111
I~ II II
, .
4'1'
11'1
'IIi
I,,!
1i'li
, I
I,
, .
"
!
i
HI
. .
. I,
, I
'.
t.
I'
,I
I
,
€>
I
i
I
I I
I
I
I
,
I
I
~
I II
I 'I
I II
1'1 II
,I .I,
I! II
I ~ : I
n,,,,
i1111
lilll
II
IIII
,II
.'1
~
,
(
f
J
{
I
1111(111
lillil
ii'!iH
III
'i :
I, I
r
!
".
j
){
<
I
f
8
5
-4E
lIt
lit
!II
pi
I'i
I' ~
,Ir
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 5, 1991
Case No.: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183
Prepared By: Oliver Mujica
2,
RECOMMEND ADOPTION of Negative
Declaration for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183; and
ADOPT Resolution No. 91-
recommending approval of Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183.
Recommendation: 1,
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Bedford Properties
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates
PROPOSAL:
Subdivide ~8.8 acres into 155 single family
residential lots; 3 open space lots; and 1 park site
within Planning Area No.5 of Specific Plan No. 219.
Amendment No.1,
LOCATION:
Southeast corner of De Portola Road and Meadows
Parkway.
EXISTING ZONING:
Specific Plan No. 219. Amendment No, 1
East:
Planning Area No.9
Planning Areas 2 (Very High Density
Residential) and 3 (Medium High
Density Residential).
Planning Area No. 3 (Medium High
Density Residential)
Planning Area No.6 (Very High Density
Residential)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
West:
PROPOSED ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
Not Applicable
Vacant
A:VTM2~183
1
'5&
PROJECT STATISTICS:
BACKGROUND:
A:VTM2~183
Total Land Area:
~8. 8 acres
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
No. of Proposed Lots:
155 single family, 3
open space, 1 park
~.37 DUlac
~.37 DUlac
5.095 sq, ft.
1 .60 acres
Proposed Density:
Specific Plan Density:
Min. ResidentiaL Lot Size:
Useable Open Space Area:
(Lot 156)
On September 6, 1988, the Riverside County Board
of Supervisors adopted Resolution No, 88-~70
approving Specific Plan No. 219 (Meadows). The
Meadows provided a total of 5,611 dwelling units on
1,036 acres. I n addition, the Board of Supervisors
certified Environmental Impact Report No. 235 for
Specific Plan No. 219 as an accurate and objective
statement that complies with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Furthermore,
a statement of overriding findings was made for the
Air Quality Impacts.
On November 15, 1989, the applicant filed Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183 to the Riverside
County Planning Department, which proposed to
subdivide the subject 48.8 acre site into 155 single
family residential lots; 3 open space lots; and 1 park
site.
The project was reviewed by the Riverside County
Land Division Committee (LDC) on December 11,
1989; February 26. 1990; and April 2, 1990. During
these meetings the LOC indicated that Specific Plan
No.219, Amendment No.1 must be adopted prior to
the approval of the tentative map.
Subsequently. this project was transferred to the
City of Temecula on April 23, 1990.
On November 15, 1990, this project was reviewed by
the Preliminary Development Review Committee
(Pre-ORe) in order to informally evaluate the
project and address any possible concerns, as well
as suggesting possible modifications. The comments
by the Pre-DRC included the following:
1. Park Site Considerations
2. Public Improvements
3. Storm Drain System
~. Drainage
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
ANALYSIS:
A:VTM2~183
Subsequent to the Pre-DRC meeting. Staff met with
the applicant to discuss the required supplemental
material in order to address the Pre-DR CiS
concerns.
On February 27. 1991. Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 2~183 was reviewed by the Formal Development
Review Committee; and. it was determined that the
project. as designed. can be adequately conditioned
to mitigate the DRC's concerns. The DRC has
forwarded a recommendation of approval subject to
conditions.
On April 9. 1991. the City Council Adopted
Resolution No, 91-36 approving Change of Zone No.
5621 and Specific Plan No. 219. Amendment No.1.
amending the boundaries and land use designations
of Planning Areas 1, 2. 5 and 6 of Specific Plan No.
219. Subsequently. on April 23. 1991. the City
Council adopted Ordinance No. 91-13 amending
Zoning Ordinance No. 90-0~ pertaining to Ordinance
No. 3~8.2919 (Specific Plan No. 219) as it relates to
zoning.
The Planning Commission May recall that Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183 was originally
scheduled for their public hearing meeting of March
18, 1991. However. at the request of the applicant.
this item was continued prior to the meeting "off-
calendar" in order to allow the applicant the
opportunity to further discuss the Conditions of
Approval. relative to traffic mitigation. with the
Engineering Department Staff.
As noted above. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No,
2~183 proposes to subdivide the subject ~8,8 acre
parcel into 155 single family residential lots; 3 open
space lots; and 1 park site.
The proposed subdivision has been designed in
accordance with the standards of Specific Plan No.
219. Amendment No.1.
Traffic Impacts
The Transportation Engineering Staff has reviewed
this project; and determined that the proposed
project is consistent with the traffic mitigation
measures of EIR 235 adopted for Specific Plan No.
219, Thus. the project has been conditioned
3
-5&...
accordingly,
Access and Circulation
Access to the proposed subdivision is provided
from proposed Street "A" and Meadows Parkway.
The proposed access points are consistent with the
circulation plan of Specific Plan No. 219.
Amendment No. 1 \ see Figure ~, Page 22; and
Figure 15E, Page 91 of Specific Plan Text),
Gradinq and Landform Alteration
While substantial grading and recontouring of this
site, which includes 635,000 c,y. of excavation and
~50,000 c. y. of fill will occur in the immediate area,
the overall plan is intended to promote preservation
of site topography. The terraced landform creates
view lots within the proposed subdivision, in which
the slopes range from 5 to 30 feet in height. It
should be noted that a recommended Condition of
Approval has been included to require that all
slopes over five \ 5') feet in height shall be
landscaped immediately upon the completion of
grading and shall be maintained by the homeowners
association.
General Landscape Requirements
Pursuant to Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.
1 \see Landscape Design Guidelines and Community
Elements, Pages 223-295), all areas required to be
landscaped shall be planted with turf, ground
cover, shrub or tree materials selected from the
plant palette contained in the guidelines,
Planting shall commence as soon as slopes are
completed on any portion of the site and shall
provide for rapid short-term coverage of the slope
as well as long-term establishment cover per City
standards. The developer shall provide a landscape
bond to the City at the time that the landscape plan
is approved. The bond is to guarantee the
installation of interim erosion control planting in the
event that the grading operation is performed and
building construction does not commence within
ninety (90) days.
A:VTM2~183
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The owners of parcels which require landscape
development shall assess any existing common
landscape areas adjoining their property. Where
feasible. landscape development shall reinforce or
be compatible with such existing common area
setting.
Cut slopes equal to or greater than five [5') feet in
vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater
than three (3') feet in vertical height shall be
planted with a ground cover to protect the slope
from erosion and instability. Slopes exceeding
fifteen [15') in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10') feet on
center or trees spaced not to exceed twenty (20')
feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees
at equivalent spacings, in addition to the ground
cover.
The plants selected and planting methods shall be
suitable for the soil and climatic conditions. Refer
to the plant materials palette for the list of
community wide slope stabilization plants,
The Planning Department Staff has included a
Condition of Approval requiring that a final
landscaping plan for lots 157-159 (open space) must
be submitted for approval by the Planning
Department prior to the issuance of building
permits.
Land Use
The project site is located within Planning Area 5 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1, which is
designated as Medium High Density Residential and
allows a maximum of 155 dwelling units. Therefore,
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24183 is consistent
with the specific plan. due to the fact that 155
residential lots are proposed. In addition,
according to the development standards. as outlined
in Specific Plan No. 219, in Amendment No.1,
Planning Area 5 permits a minimum lot size of 4,000
square feet. in which the proposal provides a
minimum lot size of 5,095 square feet. Thus, this
project is consistent with the Specific Plan,
A:VTM24183
5
~()
SPECIFIC PLAN AND
GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY:
ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:
FINDINGS:
A: VTM2ij183
Useable Open Space
A 1.60 acre private park site (Lot 156) is proposed
and is centrally located to provide recreational open
space for the residents within the subject tract.
The Planning Department Staff has included a
Condition of Approval requiring that a plot plan
application must be submitted for Planning
Department approval prior to the issuance of
building permits.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The proposed project is consistent with the Land
Use Designation of Specific Plan and Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No. , I Planning Area 5 -
Medium High Density Residential). In addition,
Staff has determined it probable that this project
will be consistent with the new General Plan when it
is adopted.
Pursuant to Condition Of Approval No. 12 of
Specific Plan No. 219,an Initial Study was
performed for this project which determined that
although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, no significant
impact would result to the natural or built
environment in the City because the mitigation
measures described in EI R 235 and in the Conditions
of Approval have been added to the project, and a
Negative Declaration has been recommended for
adoption.
1, The proposed Tract Map will not have a
significant negative impact on the
environment, as determined in the Initial
Study performed for the project. A Negative
Declaration is recommended for c.doption.
2. There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the General
Plan being prepared at this time, due to the
fact that the project is consistent with
Specific Plan No. 219. Amendment No.1,
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3,
~.
A:VTM2~183
There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to, or interference
with, the future adopted General Plan, if the
proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan, due to the fact that the project is
consistent with surrounding land uses,
The proposed use complies with State
planning and Zoning law, due to the fact that
the project conforms to the current zoning
for the site and to Ordinance No. ~60,
Schedule A.
s.
The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configurations. access, and
density due to the fact that the project has
access to public roads and a specific plan will
be implemented with this project.
The design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or
substantially avoidable injury to fish or
wildlife or their habitat as determined in the
I nitial Study.
6,
7,
The design of the subdivision is consistent
with the State Map Act in regard to future
passive energy control opportunities due to
the fact that the lots provide sufficient
southern exposure.
8,
All lots have access to existing and proposed
dedicated rights-of-way which are open to,
and are useable by, vehicular traffic, access
is provide from Street "A" of the specific
plan.
9,
The design of the subdivision, the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project as
conditioned. The project will not interfere
with any easements.
7
10, The lawful conditions stated in the project's
Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary
to protect the public health, safety and
general welfare.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11, That said findings are supported by minutes,
maps. exhibits, and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning department Staff recommends that the
Planning Commission:
OM:mb
Attachments:
A:VTM24183
1, RECOMMEND ADOPTION of the Negative
Declaration for Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 24183; and
2. ADOPT Resolution No. 91-_ recommending
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
24183.
1. Resolution
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Environmental Assessment
4. Exhibits:
A. Vicinity Map
B. Specific Land Use Map
C. Planning Area No.5 Map
D. Planning Area No.5 Standards
E. Tentative Tract Map
5. Large Scale Plan
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECUlA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 21.1183 TO
SUBDIVIDE A 1.18.8 ACRE PARCEL INTO 155 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 3 OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND
1 PARK SITE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
DE PORTOLA ROAD AND MEADOWS PARKWAY AND
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 923-230-002
(PORTION)
WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Vesting Tentative Tract Map No,
21.1183 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Tentative Tract Map application was processed in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Tentative Tract
Map on August 5, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to
testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Tentative Tract Map;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby
makes the following findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly
incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months
following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city
is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
req'lirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the
general plan, if all of the following requirements are met:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the
preparation of the general plan.
12) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and
taking other actions, including the issuance of building
permits, each of the following:
A:VTM21.1183
9
(0\
la) There is a reasonable probability that the
land use or action proposed will be consistent
with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time,
I b) There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
I c) The proposed use or action complied with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan. as amended by the
Southwest Area Community Plan. (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted
prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the
southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time. the City has adopted SWAP as
its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely
fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the
SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the
Government Code. to wit:
(1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with a
preparation of the general plan.
(2) The Planning Commission finds. in recommending
approval of projects and taking other actions. including
the issuance of building permits. pursuant to this title.
each of the following:
I a) There is reasonable probability that Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183 proposed will
be consistent with the general plan proposal
being considered or studied or which will be
studied within a reasonable time.
I b) There is little or no probability of substantial
detriment to or interference with the future
adopted general plan if the proposed use or
action is ultimately inconsistent with the
plan.
A:VTM2ij183 10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(c) The proposed use or action complies with all
other applicable requirements of state law and
local ordinances.
D. (,) Pursuant to Section 7,1 of County Ordinance No.
~60, no subdivision may be approved unless the following findings are
made:
a) That the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans,
b) That the design or improvement of the
proposed land division is consistent with
applicable general and specific plans,
c) That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the type of
development.
d) That the site of the proposed land division is
physically suitable for the proposed density
of the development.
e) That the design of the proposed land division
or proposed improvements are not likely to
cause substantial environmental damage or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat.
fl That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems,
g) That the design of the proposed land division
or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at
large. for access through. or use of,
property within the proposed land division.
A hmd division may be approved if it is found
tha~ alternate easements for access or for use
will be provided and that they will be
substantially equivalent to ones previously
acquired by the public. This subsection
shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgment of a court
of competent jurisdiction.
A:VTM2~183
11
~1"
(2) The Planning Commission in recommending approval
of the proposed Tentative Tract Map. makes the following findings. to
wit:
a) The proposed Tract Map will not have a
significant negative impact on the
environment. as determined in the Initial
Study performed for the project. A Negative
Declaration is recommended for adoption.
b) There is a reasonable probability that this
project will be consistent with the General
Plan being prepared at this time. due to the
fact that the project is consistent with
Specific Plan No. 219. Amendment No.1,
c) There is not a likely probability of
substantial detriment to. or interference
with. the future adopted General Plan. if the
proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with
the plan. due to the fact that the project is
consistent with surrounding land uses.
d) The proposed use complies with State
planning and Zoning law. due to the fact that
the project conforms to the current zoning
for the site and to Ordinance No. ~60.
Schedule A.
e) The site is suitable to accommodate the
proposed land use in terms of the size and
shape of the lot configurations. access. and
density due to the fact that the project has
access to public roads and a specific plan will
be implemented with this project.
fl The design of the subdivision or the
proposed improvements are not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or
substantially avoidable injury to fish or
wildlife or their habitat as determined in the
Initial Study.
g) The design of the subdivision is consistent
with the State Map Act in regard to future
passive energy control opportunities due to
the fact that the lots provide sufficient
southern exposure.
A: VTM2~183
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
h) All lots have access to existing and proposed
dedicated rights-of-way which are open to.
and are useable by. vehicular traffic. access
is provide from Street "A" of the specific
plan,
i) The design of the subdivision. the type of
improvements and the resulting street layout
are such that they are not in conflict with
easements for access through or use of the
property within the proposed project as
conditioned. The project will not interfere
with any easements.
j) The lawful conditions stated in the project's
Conditions of Approval are deemed necessary
to protect the public health. safety and
general welfare,
k) That said findings are supported by minutes.
maps. exhibits. and environmental documents
associated with these applications and herein
incorporated by reference,
E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3. the Tentative
Tract Map is compatible with the health. safety and welfare of the
community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance.
An Initial Study prepared for this project indicates that although the
proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment. there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in EIR
235 and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project. and a
Negative Declaration. therefore. is hereby recommended for adoption.
SECTION 1:. Conditions,
That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends'
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 2~'83 for the subdivision of a ~8.8 acre
parcel into 155 single family residential lots; 3 open space lots; and 1 park site
located on the southeast corner of De Portola Road and Meadows Parkway and known
as Assessor's Parcel No. 923-230-002 (portion) subject to the following conditions:
A.
Exhibit A. attached hereto.
A:VTM2~183
13
(o?:J
JOHN HOAGLAND
CHAIRMAN
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of August. 1991,
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by
the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof. held
on the 5th day of August. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
A:VTM211183
111
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No:
2~183
Project Description: 155 Sinqle Family
Residential; 3 Open Space; and 1 Park
Assessor's Parcel No, : 923-023-002
Planninq Department
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision
Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance ~60, Schedule A, unless
modified by the conditions listed below, A time extension may be approved in
accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request.
if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2, This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the
approval date by the City Council. unless extended as provided by Ordinance
460.
3. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final
map.
~. Legal access as required by Ordinance ~60 shall be provided from the tract
map boundary to a City maintained road.
5, Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area
improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department
approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access
to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and
purpose of the subdivision approval.
6. A copy of the final grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval. All on-site cut and fill slopes shall:
a. Be limited to a maximum slope ratio of 2 to 1.
b. Be contour-graded to blend with existing natural contours.
c. Be a part of the downhill lot when within or between individual lots.
7. All slopes over three (3) feet in height shall be landscaped and irrigated
according to the City Development Code, An erosion control landscaping plan
demonstrating methods of erosion protection for these slopes shall be prepared
by a qualified professional; and shall be submitted to the City Planning
Department for review and approval prior to issuance of grading permits.
A: VTM2~183
15
(A
8, The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations
outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated November 13,
1990, a copy of which is attached.
9. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy, as outlined in the
Southwest Area Plan,
10, This subdivision shall comply with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1.
11, Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following:
a. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the
development standards of Planning Area 5 as provided Specific Plan No,
219, Amendment No.1.
b, Lots 1-155 shall be a minimum size of 4,000 square feet.
c. Corner lots and through lots. if any, shall be provided with additional
area pursuant to Section 3.88 of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain
less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and non-
through lots.
d. Trash bins, loading areas and incidental storage areas. located in
recreation areas, shall be located away and visually screened from
surrounding areas with the use of block walls and landscaping.
e. Bike racks and bike lockers in sufficient quantity shall be provided in
convenient locations to facilitate bike access to recreation areas.
f. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free
condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or
provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
12. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes.
landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations
are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director,
13. The subdivider and all successors in interest shall comply with the provisions
of Development Agreement No.4 and Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1.
14. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet
(ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate
identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the
office of the City Engineer. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the
Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be
forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department
and the Department of Building and Safety.
A:VTM24183
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
15. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet:
a. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory, All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with
the California Institute of Technology. Palomar Observatory
recommendations.
b. County Slope Stability Report No. 122 was prepared for this property
and is on file at the Planning Department. Specific items of concern in
the report are as follows: Slope Stability.
16, The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping
conditions:
a. Prior to the issuance of building permits. the developer shall secure
approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the City
Engineering and Planning Department, All landscaping and irrigation
plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format
suitable for permanent filing with the City Engineering Department.
b. The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be
released concurrently with the release of subdivision performance
bonds. guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be
installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by
the district.
c. The developer. the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees.
shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such
time as maintenance as taken over by the Community Services District.
d. The developer shall comply with the standards and exhibits in Specific
Plan No. 219. Amendment No.1.
17, Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. If the project is to be phased. prior to the issuance of grading permits.
an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for apprcval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for
subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development
and shall include the following:
1.
Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and
sedimentation during and after the grading process.
Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas
which may be graded during the higher probability rain months
of January through March,
2.
3.
Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
A:VTM24183
17
<c.(y
A:VTM211183
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lj, Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase,
b. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and
exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded
incorporating the following grading techniques:
1 , The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the
angle of the natural terrain.
2, Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall
reflect the natural rounded terrain.
3. The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with
radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes
where drainage and stability permit such rounding.
II. Where cut or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the
horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous,
undulating fashion.
c. Prior to the issuance of grading permits. the developer shall provide
evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site
manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope
maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety,
18. Prior to the issuance of grading permits. a qualified paleontologist shall be
retained by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed
grading with respect to potential paleontological impacts, Should the
paleontologist find the potential is high for impact to significant resources, a
pre-grade meeting between the paleontologist and the excavation and grading
contractor shall be arranged. When necessary, the paleontologist or
representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt
grading activity to allow recovery of fossils,
19. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be
satisfied:
a. The project shall comply with the requi"ements of Development
Agreement No. II.
b. Prior to the issuance of building permits detailed common open space
area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval for the phase of development in process. The
plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for
the following:
1.
Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all
landscaped areas requiring irrigation,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A;VTM24183
c.
d.
e,
2, Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be
opaque up to a minimum height of six 16) feet at maturity.
3. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from
view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle
treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall
be placed underground.
4. Parkways shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a
transition into the primary use area of the site, Landscape
elements shall include earth berming, ground cover, shrubs and
specimen trees. Front yards shall be landscaped and street trees
planted,
5. Wall plans shall be submitted for the project perimeter, Wooden
fencing shall not be allowed on the perimeter of the project. All
lots with slopes leading down from the lot shall be provided with
gates in the wall for maintenance access.
6. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent
trees at key visual focal points within the project.
7, Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of
interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road
right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-
way.
8. Landscaping plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant
plants where appropriate.
9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. Weaker and/or slow
growing trees shall be steel staked,
No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential
lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor's-
in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility
financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars 1$100) per
lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library
development.
Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building
and Safety an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical
engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be
applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce
ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn.
All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required
elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as
approved by the County Fire Marshal,
19
~~
j.
k,
A: VTM24183
f.
Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval.
The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring
landscaping and irrigation to be installed including, but not limited to.
parkway planting. street trees. slope planting, and individual front
yard landscaping.
Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision. however solar equipment or any other energy saving
devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval,
Building separation between all buildings including fireplaces shall
comply with the design guidelines of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
g.
h.
i.
All street side yard setbacks shall comply with the design guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1,
All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and a manually
operated permanent underground irrigation system.
Prior to the issuance of building permits for Lots 1-155, a plot plan
shall be submitted to the Planning Department pursuant to Section 18,30
of Ordinance No. 348 accompanied by all applicable filing fees, as a plot
plan that is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act and
is not transmitted to any governmental agency other than the City
Planning Department. The plot plan shall ensure the conformance of
the final site development with the Design Guidelines of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No. 1. and shall contain the following elements:
1. A final site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all
setback, and floor plan and elevation assignments to individual
lots.
2, One ( 1) color and materials sample board (maximum si ze of 8 x 13
inches by 3/8 inch thick) containing precise color, texture and
material swatches or photographs (which may be from suppliers'
brochures). Indicate on the board the name, address and phone
numbers of both the sample board preparer and the projtlct
applicant, tract number, and the manufacturer and product
numbers where possible (trade names also acceptable) .
3. One (1) copy of the architectural elevations colored to represent
the selected color combinations, with symbols keyed to the color
and materials board. The written color and material descriptions
shall be located on the elevation,
20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I. Said plot plan shall require the approval of the Planning Director prior
to the issuance of any building permits for lots included within the plot
plan. The submittal of plot plans prior to the issuance of building
permits may be phased provided:
1. A separate plot plan shall be submitted to the Planning
Department for each phase, which shall be accompanied by
appropriate filing fees.
2. Each individual plot plan shall be approved by the Planning
Director prior to the issuance of building permits for lots
included within that plot plan,
m, Prior to the issuance of building permits for Lot 156. a plot plan shall
be submitted to the Planning Department pursuant to Section 1S.30 of
Ordinance No. 3~S accompanied by all applicable filing fees, as a plot
plan that is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act and is
transmitted to any governmental agencies other than the City Planning
Department. The plot plan shall ensure the conformance of the final
site development with the Design Guidelines of Specific Plan No, 219,
Amendment No.1.
20. Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall
be satisfied:
a. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, If seasonal
conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion
control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director
and the Director of Building and Safety,
b. All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with
approved plans and shall be verified by City field inspection.
c. Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical
study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all
required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where
applicable.
21. ?rior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the
provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in
that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions
of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by
Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat
Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution,
A:VTM2~1S3
21
~
22, The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Temecula. its agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action. or
proceeding against the City of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees
to attach, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the City of Temecula. its
advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183" which action is brought within the time period
provided for in California Government Code Section 66~99.37. The City of
Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider
shall not, thereafter. be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless
the City of Temecula.
23. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site
property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so. the developer shall
at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval. enter into
an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code
Section 66~62 at such time as the City acquires the property interests
required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by
the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property
interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion
of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer. at the developer's cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the
appraisal.
2~. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable
TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required,
and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provided. Telephone. cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired
in the residence.
25, Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the developer or his assignee must
conform to the park district Quimby Ordinance, unless waived to time of
Issuance of a building permit.
26. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed
underground,
27. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions I CC&R's) shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works
prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC&R's shall include liability
insurance and methods of maintaining the open space. recreation areas,
parking areas. drainage facilities, private roads, and exterior of all
buildings.
A:VTM2~183
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
28, No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with
the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common
facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet
the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to
maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory
membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services,
Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required
by the City as Conditions of Approval, The developer shall submit evidence
of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior
to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to
the City for public purposes,
29. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and
facilities, or (2) as share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association, owning the common areas and facilities.
30. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be
provided for in the CC&R's. '
31. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project, the
applicant/ developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand.
Two Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($1,275,00 L which includes the One
Thousand, Two Hundred. Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) fee in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711, 4( d)( 2) plus the Twenty-
Five Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152
and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour
period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check required above, the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c).
Riverside County Fire Department
32. Schedule a fire protection approved standard fire hydrants. (6Ix4"x2 1/2")
located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart
in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from
a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20
PSI.
A :VTM24183
23
(q;""
33. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the
Fire Department for review. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil
engineer, containing a Fire Department approval signature block, and shall
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow. Once plans
are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Department for signature.
34, The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and
accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building
material being placed on an individual lot.
3S. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
City of Temecula, a cash sum of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire
protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment,
he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of the first building permit.
Department of Public Works
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this
project. and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions
regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Department of
Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled
ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further consideration.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
36. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. the developer shall
receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Departm'!!nt;
CATV Franchise; and
Parks and Recreation Department.
37. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works. all road easements
and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and
shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
A:VTM24183
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
38, Streets B,C,D,E.and F shall be improved with ~o feet of asphalt concrete
pavement. or bonds for the street improvements may be posted. within the
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with County Standard No. 10~, Section
A (60'/~O').
39. Streets G, H, and I shall be improved with a ten foot (10') median strip
bounded by 20 feet of asphalt concrete pavement on each side, or bonds for
the street improvements may be posted. within the dedicated right-of-way in
accordance with County Standard No, 10~. Section A 170'/50').
~O. In the event that full improvements for Meadows Parkway, De Portola Road
and Street A are not constructed by Assessment District 159 prior to the final
map recordation, the developer shall construct or bond for the improvements
to provide for one-half street improvements plus one 12 foot lane per
Riverside County Standard No. 109 (100'/76'). The improvements shall be
constructed prior to occupancy.
~ 1 , Vehicular access shall be restricted on Meadows Parkway, De Portola Road and
Street "A" and so noted on the final map with the exception of Public street
intersections as approved by the Department of Public Works or shown on the
tentative map.
~2. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard
No. 805.
~3. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where
sidewalks meander through private property.
~~. Easements, when required for roadway slopes. landscape easements. drainage
facilities. utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located
within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
~5. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be
executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements
in conformance with applicable City standards.
a. Street improvements, including, but n"t limited to: pavement. curb
and gutter. medians. sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and other traffic control
devices as appropriate.
b. Storm drain' facilities,
c. Landscaping (street and parks).
d. Sewer and domestic water systems.
e, All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans,
A;VTM2~183 25
vf6
A: VTM24183
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f. Undergrounding of existing and proposed utility distribution lines.
46. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated
with adjoining developments.
47. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in
accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 461 and as approved by the
Department of Public Works,
48. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the
Department of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation
towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time
of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written
agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a
building permit.
49. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Department of Public
Works.
50. The minimum centerline radii shall be 300 feet or as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
51. All street centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
52. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a
minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
53. A minimum centerline street grade shall be 0.50 percent.
54. All driveways shall conform to the applicable County of Riverside standards
and shall be shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with County
Standard 400 and 401 I curb sidewalk).
55. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the property
line.
56. The subdivider shall submit two (2) prints of a comprehensive grad:ng plan
to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the uniform
Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these
Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 24" x 36" mylar by a
Registered Civil Engineer.
57. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted at the time of application for grading plan check,
58. The subdivider shall submit two (2) copies of a soils report to the Department
of Public Works. The report shall address the soils stability and geological
conditions of the site.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
, I
I
I
I
I
'19. ,0.. drainage study. shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of
Public Works,
60. On-site drainage facilities. located outside of road right-of-way. shall be
contained within drainage easements shown on the final map, A note shall be
added to the final map stating "Drainage easements shall be kept free of
buildings and obstructions."
61. A copy of the improvement plans. grading plans and final map. along with
supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations should be submitted to the
Riverside County Flood Control District and to the City of Temecula
Department of Public Works for review.
62. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage
flowing onto or through the site. I n the event the Department of Public Works
permits the use of streets for drainage purposes. the provisions of Article X I
of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street
capacity. or use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes. the
subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by the Department of
Public Works,
63, Prior to final map. the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of
the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time
of street improvements.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CRADINC PERMITS:
64, Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way. fees shall be paid
and an encroachment permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public
Works.
65. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any grading outside of the City-maintained road right-of-
way,
66. All lot drainage shall be to the street by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
E7. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid, The charge shall equal the prevailing
Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The
charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits.
If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to
this property. no new charge needs to be paid.
A:VTM24183
27
CA
A:VTM2~183
28
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
68. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works
for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered
Civil Engineer for location and elevation. and the Soil Engineer shall issue a
Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
69, Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The
final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough
grading plan.
70. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project. including that for traffic and public
facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the
project. The fee to be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of
payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or
district has not been finally established by the date on which developer
requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof. the
developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee. a
copy of which has been provided to developer. Concurrently. with executing
this Agreement. developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot. not to
exceed $10.000. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the
payment of fees in excess of those now estimated I assuming benefit to the
project in the amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement.
developer will waive any right to protest the provisions of this Condition. of
this Agreement, the formation of any traffic impact fee district. or the
process, levy. or collection of any traffic mitigation or traffic impact fee for
this project; provided that developer is not waiving its right to protest the
reasonableness of any traffic impact fee. and the amount thereof.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
71. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and
gutter. A.C, pavement. sidewalk. drive approaches. parkway trees and
street lights on all interior public streets. Secondary Access shall be
provided for any phasing as specified and approved by the Department of
Public Works.
72. Existing city roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all
times with adequate detours during construction.
73. Asphaltic emulsion I fog seal) shall be applied not less than 1 ~ days following
placement of the asphalt surf acing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon
per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section Nos. 37. 39. and
9~ of the State Standard Specifications.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
Backqround
1.
Name of Proponent:
Bedford Properties
2.
Address and Phone
Number of Proponent:
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 200
Temecula, CA 92390
(71~) 676-7290
3.
Date of Environmental
Assessment:
Februarv 13, 1991
~.
Agency Requiring
Assessment:
CITY OF TEMECULA
5.
Name of Proposal,
if applicable:
Tentative Tract Map No, 2~183
6.
Location of Proposal:
Southeast corner of De Portola Road
and Meadows Parkwav.
II. Proiect Description
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~183 proposes to subdivide the subject ~8.8 acre site,
which is within Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1, into 155
single family residential lots; 3 open space lots; and 1 park,
Project Summary:
SP 219
TM 2~183
Planning Area 5
155 D.U.
155 Lots
.
A: VTM2~183
30
\0
Transportation Enqineerinq
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:
7~. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for Meadows Parkway, De Portola Road
and Streets "A" through "\" and shall be included in the street improvement
plans,
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
75. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil
Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the
City Engineer.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS:
76. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and
striping plan.
Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact the Department of Public
Works for the design requirements.
77,
~Vi.\t
Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for the intersections of Meaae'!'E
Peull"''')' and 8~ Parte I.. Read, De Portola Road and Street "A" and Street "A"
and Meadows Parkway. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational
per the special provisions and the approved traffic signal plan. wIiMNl
.JNaI"I"9MeQ .
.
A:VTM2~183
29
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
III, Discussion of the Environmental Evaluation
The following environmental impacts associated with Specific Plan No. 219 are
insignificant in that the design of the project as proposed includes the necessary
mitigation measures which have been adopted within EIR 235:
A. Water and Sewer: The project will have an average daily consumption
of domestic water of 1.683,300 gallons at 300
gallonsl d. u.1 day, The project will generation
between 1,81 and 3,08 million gallons per day of
sewage flow. On site wastewater collection facilities
will be constructed to tie into Eastern Municipal
Water District's master planned facilities being
constructed through the Rancho Villages
Assessment District. Construction of all structures
within the project will conform to state laws
requiring water efficient plumbing fixtures.
B, Utilities: Gas. electricity. and telephone service will be
provided by respective purveyors of the service.
Lines for electrical and telephone services. and
mains for natural gas are located along the project
boundaries.
C. Enerqy Resources: The project will increase consumption of energy for
motor vehicle movement. space and water heating.
air conditioning. use of home appliances. and
operation of construction equipment. The project
will adhere to State Code Title 24 energy
conservation standards and will employ site design.
when possible. for additional energy conservation.
Non vehicular pathways are included within. and
adjacent to. the project site. Commercial and
employment centers are in proximity to the project
site.
D, Parks and Recreation: Project residents will create a demand for parks and
recreation facilities. and for open space. The
project design provides 242+1- acres of recreation
areas. parkway greenbelts. and paseo ('pen space.
The following environmental impacts associated with Specific Plan No. 219 are
potentially significant. but will be avoided or substantially lessened by the identified
mitigation measures which have been adopted within EIR 235:
A, Seismic Safety
1.
Impact:
Although faults have been previously mapped on-
site. they have been determined to be inactive and
the risk of ground rupture due to faulting on the
project is considered nil, Liquefaction potential
exists along the entire flat alluviated area of
Temecula Creek within the southern site boundary.
A:VTM24183
31
"\\
2, Mitiqation:
B. Slopes and Erosion
1. Impact:
2 . Mitiqation :
C. Floodinq
1. Impact:
2 . Mitiqation :
A:VTM24183
During site development. additional geologic
evaluation shall be continued in order to verify the
extent and relative age of fault activity. Mitigation
of the liquefaction potential within the southern
portion of the site will occur as a result of project
development. which will lower artificially high
groundwater levels by removal of recharge ponds.
as well as increase overburden as a result of site
gradins .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Meadows 5pecific Plan will unavoidably alter
some of the existing landforms. Owing to the
general granular nature of graded slopes. a
moderate to severe erosion potential exists if slopes
are unprotected. Removal and recompaction of
portions of alluvial/colluvial soils within fill areas
and shallow cut areas will be necessary,
Temporary groundcover shall be provided to
prevent erosion during the construction phase.
Permanent vegetation shall be planted as soon as
possible after grading, Specific requirements for
alluvial/colluvial soils removal shall be developed
during tentative map studies and incorporated into
project grading. The three small possible landslide
areas shall be investigated during design level
studies and all mitigation measures identified as a
result of that investigation will be incorporated into
future development approvals. Remedial grading
recommendations to provide for the long term
stability will be provided based upon a finali2ed
grading design.
Development of the Vail Meadows Specific Plan will
alter the existing drainage patterns and will
increase runoff to Temecula Creek and. to a lesser
extent. Murrieta Creek.
A master drainage plan has been developed to
respond to the hydrological constraints of the site.
A more in-depth assessment of the Temecula
floodplain shall be conducted during the final
design and preparation of the tentative tract maps,
and all mitigation measures identified as a result of
that assessment will be incorporated into future
development approvals. Erosion control devices
shall be utilized in hillside development areas to
mitigate the effect of increased runoff at points of
discharge. If required. the project applicant will
32
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
contribute Drainage
appropriate,
Improvement Fees as
D. Noise
1,
Impact:
Noise generated from the project will derive from
two sources. construction and vehicular traffic, but
is not anticipated to result in unacceptable noise
levels to existing or proposed off-site uses. On site
areas adjacent to high volume roadways may be
subject to noise impacts.
A noise analysis shall be required in planning areas
adjacent to high volume perimeter roads. If
indicated. noise attenuation will be incorporated
into project design.
2.
Mitiqation :
E. Water Quality
1.
Impact:
Implementation of the project will alter the
composition of surface runoff by grading the site
surfaces; by construction of impervious streets,
roofs and parking facilities; and by the irrigation of
landscaped areas. Runoff conveyed to Temecula
and Murrieta Creeks will contain minor amounts of
pollutants.
2.
Mitiqation:
The project will employ erosion control devices
during grading. such as temporary berms.
culverts, sand bagging or desilting basins. Urban
runoff will be mitigated through implementation of a
street cleaning program.
F. Wildlife/Veqetation
1.
Impact:
As a consequence of grassland and coastal sage
scrub vegetation removal. existing wildlife will
either be destroyed or displaced. Impacts upon
habitat containing a population of the Stephen's
Kangaroo Rat will result.
The project applicant will participate in any in-place
County program which provides for off-site
mitigation of impacts to the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat.
or enter into a Memorandum of Understanding wit
the California Department of Fish and Game.
2.
Mitiqation:
G. Historic and Prehistoric Sites
1.
Impact:
Without proper mitigation, implementation of the Vail
Meadows Specific Plan could potentially destroy
archaeological/historical sites on the property.
A:VTM2ij183
33
",\1-'
2. Mitiqation:
H. Circulation
1, Impact:
2. Mitiqation:
I. Fire Protection
1. Impact:
2. Mitiqation:
J. Sheriff
1, Impact:
2. Mitiqation:
K, Schools
1, Impact:
2. Mitiqation:
A:VTM2~183
Prior to the approval of any additional implementing
processes. the applicant/developer will meet with
the County Historical Commission to determine
appropriate measures to mitigate potential impacts
to archaeological/ historical sites; all mitigation
measures identified as a result of the meeting I s) will
be incorporated into future development approvals,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Vail Meadows Specific Plan is anticipated to
generate ~7. 600 vehicle trips per day at project
completion, Approximately ~O.OOO of these trips
would be external to the site.
Construction of the proposed circulation network
will adequately service future on-site traffic
volumes. Off-site improvements will be constructed
as required by the County Road Department and
CalTrans.
The project site would be subject to Category II
urban development requirements with regard to fire
protection services.
The project site will be served by a proposed fire
station. to be constructed near Highway 79. The
developer will pay mitigation fees as required by the
Board of Supervisors,
Project residents will impose increased demands on
law enforcement and sheriff services.
Project design will incorporate appropriate lighting.
site design. security hardware and such design
features as will promote optimal security. The
developer will pay mitigation fees as required by the
Board of Supervisors.
The project will generate an estimated 3.109
students in grades K-8 and 1.187 students in
grades 9-12. impacting the Temecula Union School
District.
The project has designated four elementary school
sites and one junior high school site. The developer
will pay school mitigation fees as required.
3~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L. Solid Waste
1.
Impact:
Project residents. estimated at 1~.587. will generate
approximately 58 tons per day of solid waste.
incrementally shortening the life of County landfill
sites.
2.
Mitiqation:
The County Solid Waste Management Plan includes
programs for reducing the quantity of wastes being
landfilled. including source reduction and business
and residential separation of recoverables. These
programs may be implemented by project residents
and businesses.
M, Libraries
1.
Impact:
The project's population will increase demand for
library facilities and services.
2.
Mitiqation:
The developer will pay library mitigation fees as
required by the Board of Supervisors.
The following environmental impact associated with Specific Plan No. 219 cannot be
fully mitigation and a statement of overriding findings has been adopted within EIR
235:
Air Quality
1.
Impact:
At project build-out, daily motor vehicle emissions
for the project will total approximately 7. 75~
Ibsl day. Power plant emissions for electrical
energy consumed on-site will total 175 Ibs/day.
Natural gas emissions for project consumption will
total 163.6 Ibs per day, Approximately 100 Ibs of
dust per acre will be generated each day of
construction in addition to an undetermined amount
of motor emissions during site preparation an
construction.
2,
Mitiqation:
Because most of the project-related air pollution
emissions are generated by automobiles, effective
mitigation is limited. On-site provisions for
schools. shopping, and recreation has been
incorporated into project design. Sufficient acreage
has been zoned for industrial use in the Rancho
California/T emecula area to provide employment
opportunities. project design includes a circulation
plan designed for efficient and direct traffic flows
and alternative transit modes including pedestrian.
bicycle. and equestrian trails. The Rancho Villages
Policy Plan. to which this project is subject.
requires pedestrian and bus stop facilities for
A: VTM2~183
35
\?
commercial areas. These requirements will be
implemented at the development application stage,
Particulate matter and other pollutants generated
during grading and construction will be reduced
through compliance with County Ordinance No. 457
which specifies watering during construction. and
planting of ground cover.
IV. Conclusion
The Riverside County Board of Supervisors certified Environmental Impact Report
I EIR) No. 230 in conjunction with the approval of Specific Plan No. 219 and Change
of Zone No, 5140. The EIR included mitigation measures to reduce environmental
impacts to levels of insignificance. The Board of Supervisors also adopted
statements of overriding considerations for the air quality impacts. Tentative Tract
Map No. 24183 proposes a residential development that is consistent with the
guidelines and requirements of Planning Area 5 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.1; and will not result in impacts to the environment. The Conditions of Approval
are adequate to mitigate any potential significant impacts to levels of insignificance,
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and Condition of Approval No,
12 of Specific Plan No 219. this Initial Study has been prepared to demonstrate that
the proposed Tentative Tract Map will not result in new or substantially increased
significant impacts, that there have been no changes in the circumstances
surrounding the project that would require important revisions to the E I R due to new
significant impacts, and that no new information has arisen which would indicate that
the project will have significant effects not previously discussed or underestimated,
or that alternatives or mitigation measures not previously considered would
substantially reduce any significant impacts.
A: VTM24183
36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a signi-
ficant effect on the environment, there will not be a signi-
ficant effect on this case because the mitigation measures
described on attached sheets, which were adopted for EIR 235
and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
~
Date Oliver Mujica, enior PI ner
For CITY OF TEMECULA
A:VTM24183
37
x
'\'"
,
I.
,
,
,
<
F
...
~
_,...~:n_ ~ _____________
., :D
~: 2
m
.-'
-
,.
."1
'.
,.
IJ "
,
'.
t'.
,
'" '
'")
~<
/
,
.;
I
\
.'
M
,
,
,
,
, .
,.
,
I~
,
,
:
,
,
\
,
I
,
,
,
,
"
:.
, .
,~
i,
,
,
,
,
,.
"
,
v
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
,
.
..
~
,
.
,
,
.
.
'.
.'
,
. "
,,-
"
.~(
'I;
.
:,
,
'"
.,
c"
#
.'
(,
c'
J
J,p'~
- ~ C;-'
<? ?'
:._'. \ k..'
,
"
".-'-
.,
.
.
.
.,
).
"
,
~
.;.
.').
'),..
(' . .:'.
--t .... ,~_l' ..,
.. ..:' ',A:"
t':I /".~,"~":/ ',',
.,'
~ .,
,.",1 ....'-
~ -'
. .
-~
~
'"
.L.
,
\
.,
,.
I
...,
"
">
T
C.
,
.>
,
~ .'
I
r:.,
.
,
.----
- ...,'~,
,
,-' - - I
r..n......'..,/
I
"
,
,
,
,
<
,.
"
\
~\. ,
r
,.
'- .z
....., -I
~a>-l-<
; ~ -i::r:: ~
i~ /0 ~ }>
5'1" >- ll.J -0
~!i: Z
o~
~.~n ~
",0 ...,..
eO.......
- ~
~:O ~
g~ l> l.J
: n
.~ >-
~ r- r-1
~ ::;:;Vo
l 0
~ /0 <:
:: Z <;
~ '> (fJ
.;.
....-
~
~
....
~
;;
co
,
..
..
co
o
,.
....
m
..
,
N
~
,
co
~
,
'"
I
,......
-.-
~..
IIUi1'<='
"'U"
611'"
._.i..iz
~~ ~!-~
I
I
KENNETH L EDWARDS
CHIEF ENGINEER
-
1995 MARKET STREET
P_O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE (7141275-1200
FAX NO. (714) 788-9965
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
May 20, 1991
Mr, Tim Serlet, City Engineer
City of Temecula
43180 Business Park Dr" Ste, 200
Temecula, CA 92390
Attention: Mr, Douglas Stewart
Deputy City Engineer
Dear Mr, Serlet:
Re: Tract 24183
(Improvement Plan Ck, #1)
In accordance with the conditions of approval for tentative Tract
24183 set forth in our letter to the City, the following plans,
prepared by Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, have been
submitted to the District for review:
Tract 24183, hydrologic and hydraulic calculations,
The District has reviewed the plans submitted and has the
following comments:
1,
Checked plans and data have been returned to the
engineer for corrections, Additional review by the
District is anticipated and will be performed upon
resubmittal of plans by the engineer, The resubmittals
should be folded 19"x12") with the title block showing,
2,
This tract must be graded concurrently with Tracts
24186, 24185, 24184 and 24182,
.,
~,
There is no adequate outlet for this tract or any of
the other Southeast Meadows tracts, Assessment
District 159 drainage facilities in Highway 79 should
be under construction prior to any grading on Tract
24183,
Questions regarding this matter may be directed to Steven Clark
of this office at 714/275-1267,
Very truly y~ur ,
II '-p II
<LJ.JZ..h._c.J vL" >.. !G'k-~,-,-~
/ HOWARD L, DICKERSON
Senior Civil Engineer
c: Robert Bein, William Frost
and Associates
Mesa Homes
SEC:slw
~-?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BEDFORD PROPERTIES
t)
August 5, 1991
Chairman and Members of the
Planning Commission
City of Temecula
43172 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92390
Re: Public Facilities Fee Condition - Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24183
Dear Chairman and Members of the
Planning Commission:
Bedford Development Company ("Bedford") is hereby submitting its
written objection to Condition No. 70 of Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24183 relating to the payment of future "Public
Facilities Fees" being recommended by the Planning Department,
Bedford objects to this condition on the grounds that:
1) The City has failed to follow the procedures for
adopting fees set forth in California Government Code
Sections 660l6, et. sea. and therefore cannot impose
the requirement to pay fges which are non-existent.
2) The city has failed to provide satisfactory evidence
that there is a reasonable relationship between the
amount of the proposed future Public Facilities Fees
and the actual impacts of the Bedford development on
those public facilities as required by California
Government Code Sections 66000, et. seq. and the ruling
in the case of United States Supreme Court in Nollan v.
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987).
\~
Bedford Properties. Inc.
A Diversified Real Estate
Development and
Management Company
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 9016
Temecula, California
92590-0736
28765 Single Oak Drive
Suite 200
Temecula, California
92590
Telephone
714.676.5641
Facsimile
714.676.3385
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Page 2
August 5, 1991
Public Facilities
Fees cond:i.tions
o
3) The City may impose as conditions of approval of a
tentative map only those ordinances, policies and
standards which are already in effect at the time the
application for the tentative or parcel map has been
completed pursuant to California Government Code
sections 65943, 66474.2 and 66498.1.
Bedford further objects to any condition requiring Bedford to
execute an agreement for the payment of the Public Facilities Fee
prior to issuance of building permits for the same reasons as
hereinabove stated.
Very truly yours,
COMPANY
By:
LP:sw
form:pffc,l tr
~"\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f\le
CITY OF TEMECULA
PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 15. 1990
9:00 A.M.
RESULTS
Location:
Temecula Planning Department
43180 Business Park Drive
Temecula. California 92390
In Attendance:
Laura Cabral. Fire Department
John Middleton. Engineering Department
Steve Jiannino, Planning Department
Charly D. Ray. Planning Department
Scott Wright. Planning Department
Kirk Williams, Transportation Engineering Department
Lettie Boggs. Temecula Valley School District
ITEM NO.9.
Case No. :
Tentative Tract Map No. 24184 (Phasing)
Applicant:
Representative:
Proposal:
Location:
Robert Bein. William Frost & Associates
Robert Bein. William Frost & Associates
Phasing Map. Tract No. 24182.
Northwest corner of Highway 79 and Butterfield
Road,
923-230-001 (Portion)
Charly Ray
Stage
A.P, #:
Case Planner:
Temecula Valley School District
1 . No comments.
River~ide County Fire Department
1. No. comments.
Enqineerinq Department
1 , No comments.
Transportation Enqineerinq Department
1. No comments.
DRC\RESll-15
'\~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Planninq Department
1. There appears to be a lack of concerted planning coordination of proposed lot
phasing vis-a-vis necessary supporting infrastructure improvements. To
accurately and adequately evaluate proposed phasing maps. the applicant is
requested to indicate precisely. the entirety of proposed sequential phasing.
and how each phase will be provided the following improvements:
a. )
b.)
Two points of paved access.
Adequate pedestrian. bikeway and equestrian access. i. e.
partial improvements that dead-end in undeveloped tract
are not considered adequate.
Drainage improvements that adequately convey off-site
flows as wells as on-site discharge.
Adequate trunklines providing potable water. electricity.
gas and disposal of septic sewage.
Any other improvements the City may consider necessary
for the health. safety and welfare of the Community at
large.
c.)
d.)
e.)
2. The applicant should closely review all documents submitted assuring these
documents compliment one another. Miscellaneous conflicting information is
currently evident throughout the information submitted to date. particularly
in respect to specific plan documentation vs. information presented on the
Vesting Maps themselves.
3. Specify proposed usesJimprovements of all open space lots. Why are some lots
"lettered" while others are designated numerically?
ACTION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 2~184 (Phasing) will be scheduled for Formal
DRC when the information requested above has been provided and the
project issues have been addressed. Please contact the Planning
Department at (71~) 69~-6~OO if you have any questions.
DRC\RESll-15
2
,,0...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
bOdy concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182, Amendment No.3, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fUlly
in the defense, If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fUlly in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, aA6 exterior of all buildings and
parkways. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services, Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
10. . MaiAteR8Aee fer alllsAsses,:Iea BRS SPBR areas, iAeh:laiAg parlt,.\,s',..s, BAsil Be previaea
fer iR tAe CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
11. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (ll an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AS
3158. required by Fish and Game Code Section 711 .4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
S\STAFFRPT\241 B2ALLCOA
ttP
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
13. A Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Streets G, H, S and the two future entrances to the
20.0 acre Very High Density Residential parcels.
14. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along Street A, Class II and DePortola Road, Class I.
15. A Major Project Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 35 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Lot 446.
16. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 452 and 460.
17. Minor Community Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 32 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 458 and 454.
18. A Landscaped Transition Area shall be constructed per Figure 13C of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for lot 450. This Landscaped Transition Area shall be
incorporated into a 25 to 40 foot minimum building setback for the development of
structures on lots 465, 466, 467 and 468 at the Plot Plan stage.
19. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
20. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 25 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for State Highway 79.
21 . Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23A of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Butterfield Stage Road.
22. Roadway landscape treatmentshall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for DePortola Road.
23. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No,
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
24. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scenes
including Meadows Parkway, DePortola Road and Butterfield Stage Road and State
Highway 79 shllll use Deciduous Accent Grove Trees, Evergreen Bac~ground Grove
Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings identified on the plant palette per Section
IV.C.1.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
25. The LDZs along the Project Street Scene, Street A, shall use the plant palette per
Section IV.C.1.c.1. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
26. The landscaping for lots 458, 446 and 454 shall use the Accent Trees on the plant
palette in Section IV,C.1 .d. 1. and 2. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
~\
."
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
27. The plant palette for Evergreen Background Grove Trees per Section IV.C.1.d.4.a of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 and the plant palette for Deciduous Accent
Grove Trees per Section Iv.C.1.b.2.a. shall be used for the landscape buffer zones in
lot 450.
28. The Very High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3,c.l through 14 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
29. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No, 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.2.b.2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3. These walls shall be
constructed along Butterfield Stage Road, State Highway 79, Meadows Parkway,
Street A and DePortola Road.
30. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets G, Hand S.
31. The Medium High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.c.1. through 14. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
32. The Medium Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.d.1. through 7. of SpeCific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
33. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.1.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No. 3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets G, Hand S.
34. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.1.e. of Specific Plan No, 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
35. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.l.e of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
36. PISAtiA8 sRslI 88Ff1FR8R8B as seeR 85 slapes BFa 88FRpletes 8A SR'" J!l9ftiSR at tAB site
aRB BRslI ~lr8'/iBe fer Tspiel st:lsR: ten" Beverage af tAB S19f38 89 \&.811 as leAl terM
estsBlishm8Rt ae"i-aT J1Br 9t8Assras set faRA iA OnliA8Ase ~ 67.7&. P. f3SrfCrm8A88 beRB
sAall Be 9S8k:1reeJ VJitl=l tf::le PISARiAg geJ3BFtFR8At flrier te issliBAse af SR',' graeiAg pSFFAits
te iASt:lre tAB iAstallatisA af tRis ISRBS8SJ3iAg. TRia 8eAsitisR 813f3lies aRty if e8Astrl:letisR
af tAB site Bees Rat BBFAFABRBB ';:ithiA RiRet", (99) as-,s af grssiAg BJ3sratisRs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16. 19921.
37. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of the landscaping and prior to release of the dwelling
units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALL.COA ,-
5
~ 1.-- _
."
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
i I
I
I
I
I
I -
38. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following grading operations. A performance bond shall
be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits to
insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5)
feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (201 feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
39. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.l.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
40. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
41.. Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
42. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.1.,2., and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
43. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
44. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
45. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
46. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Development Agreement 92-
0013.
47. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Development Agreement 92-0013 or shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null and void.
48. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
S~TA~4182AU-COA
6
~!7
L.
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
49. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the FiRal Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typical slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational areas, paseos, equestrian trails, monuments and the
Landscape Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping, walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
I. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
J. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
K. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Pian No. 219, Amendment No.3,
L. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
M. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
50. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with SpeCific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement), or any subsequent amendments.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALL.COA
7
~~
."
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I -
-.
51 . If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
52. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
53. A Private Active Participation Opportunity Area shall be constructed for lots 465, 466,
467 and 468. This area may include facilities such as pools, spas, cabanas, meeting
rooms, barbecues, wet.bars and kitchen facilities. This area shall be a minimum of
1.05 acres.
54. A Plot Plan shall be filed for the development of lots 465, 466, 467 and 468. The
individual developments within these lots shall be consistent with this plot plan.
55. All two-story residential structures shall maintain a 40-foot setback from the State
Route 79 right-of-way (this condition applies to single family dwellings only).
56. Lots 80,81,239,240,275 and 276 (which have side structure exposure) shall be
limited to one-story residential dwellings unless the 40-foot setback requirement
(identified in Condition No. 55) can be met during final site design.
57. The following conditions shall apply to lots 465, 466, 467 and 468:
A. Future multi-family structures located on the site sRellls shall maintain a
minimum 40-foot setback from the property line along State Route 79 and a
minimum 30.foot setback from the property lines adjacent to Meadows
Parkway and . A' Street. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
B. Any future multi-family structures located within the 65 dBA noise level contour
shall be constructed .vitR sellsle paRes wiAse\'ls to maintain interior noise
levels at 45 dBA or less (refer to Wilber Smith Associates Noise Study dated
September 22, 1992 and subseQuent Study dated October 3, 1992).
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,19921.
C. Any outdoor activity/recreation areas developed as part of the multi-family
residential project shall be located in the center portion of the site where
exterior noise levels would be below 65 dBA (refer to Wilber Smith Associates
Noise Study dated September 22, 1992 and subsequent Study dated October
3, 1992).
OTHER AGENCIES
58. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALL.COA
8
~~
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
59. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
60. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
61. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
62. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
63. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
64. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
65. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department (TCSDI
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
Prior to Recordation of Final Mao(sl
66. Prop~sed community park sites of less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA). until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
67. CeFFlFfu:JAit", f!arli sites af {~n seres Sf greater BRall Be efferea fer aselieatieA t9 tRB City
af TefRS8l:tls, C8FRA=lI::IRit', Ser'Jiees DepaftFR8At (TeED) fer MsiRteABRee pl:Irpeses
fellev:iAg eeFRJ3lisAse t8 8)(istiAg Cir{ staAsafBS aRB eeFRpletisA at 8A applieatieR
Ilreeess. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16. 19921.
68. All proposed slopes, open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
S~TA~4182AULCOA
~
9
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
69. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider). shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
70. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater sAa# may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
71. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
72. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
73. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
74. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map ~ may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
75. If the City ~AgiReer Bet8F~iAes tA8t tAB ~rejeet's stfset iFRflre""eFA8Rt seREI is
iA9I:JffieisAt t8 as-/er t~e J3aFI~v:a"l laRElse8J3iA!1J BAB irrigstisA iFRJ3re'.SFR8Ats, tl::le
ElevelsJ3sr BRSII, ,:Irisr t8 reeerastisA af fiRsl FR8J3, 1389t a ISRBSe8J3B J3SrferR=l8Aee BaAEI
'I:AiaR sRall Be releasee eeA8l:1rrsAtl', \uitt:! tRB releasB af st:JssivisieA J3SrferFR8RSe
eBRss, g~8F8RteeiAg tl:\e 'JiSBilit"1 af alllsRr:jseapiAg iAstallea prier te tl-te aeeept8Ree af
R'leiAteReRee Fesl3eAsibilit'l by tRe TeSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occuoancv(sl
76. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee re~ponsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
S\STAFfRPT\24182AU..COA
10
1/6"'
..
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
77. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
78. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
79. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
80. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise !including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
81. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
82. A copy of the grading and improvement plans. along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
83. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
S\STAFFRP1'\24,e2All..CQA
L"
11
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
84. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
85. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
86. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
87. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
88. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality;
· Riverside County Flood Control District;
· Planning Department;
· Department of Public Works;
· CalTrans;
· General Telephone;
· Southern California Edison Company; and
· Southern California Gas Company.
89. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
90, An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
91 . Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
92. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Rood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
..
12
~
reP\
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
\1
I
\
,
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I J -,--
.l
93. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
94. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite or offsite drainage
course.
c. The location of existing and. post development 100-year floodplain and
flood way shall be shown on the improvement plan.
95. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
96. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns: i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
97. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
98. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right.
of-way.
99. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
right-of.way.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
100, All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
101. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, streetlights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
S\STAFFfU'T\24182ALLCOA
13 ..
. 0..0
"
~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
102. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P,C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401 .
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
j. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street .from the multi-
family residential site shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains,
103. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall t:.e 0,50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
104. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives within the multi-
family residential development shall be required for review and approval by the
Department of Public Works.
105. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
20S.
106. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
S\STAFFRPT\241I2AU.COA
C\\
14 .".
,.
.
-
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
-.
107. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
1 OS. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
109, A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
110. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
111 . As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Rood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
S\STAFFRPN41I2ALL.COA
15
C\'V
..
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
-.
112. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
113. Pedestrian access with sidewalks shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
streets "D", "F", "M", "N" and "W" to the adjacent public street.
114. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
115. Streets "G", "Wand "S" shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete pavement
with a raised 10-foot wide median, or bonds for the street improvements may be
posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City Standard
No. 104, Section A (70'/50'),
116. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 04, Section A (60'/40').
117. De Portola Road and Street "A" shall be improved with 38 feet of half street
improvement plus one 12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of.way in accordance with
City Standard No. 101, (100'06').
118. Meadows Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road shall be improved with 43 feet of half
street improvement with a raised median, plus one 12-foot lane outside the median
turn lane, or bonds for the street improvements. may be posted, within a 110'
dedicated right-of.way in accordance with City Standard No. 100, (110'/86').
119. State Highway 79 shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter, asphalt concrete
pavement, and any reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by
Caltrans within a 71-foot half"width dedicated right-of.way per Caltrans letter ,dated
January 23, 1992.
120. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not constructed
by Assessment Dietrict No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the developer
shall construct or bond for all required improvements per applicable City Standards.
All Assessment District No. 159 improvements immediately adjacent to the
development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter into
a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all offsite
improvements necessary to serve the development.
121. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
122. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street" A" and De Portola Road.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU..COA ,-
16
C\!J
L"
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
123. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or, she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
124. Vehicular access shall be restricted on State Highway 79, Butterfield Stage Road, De
Portola Road, Street' A' and Meadows Parkway and so noted on the final map with
the exception of street intersections and two (2) entry points to Street' A' for the
multi-family residential lots as shown on the approved Tentative Map and as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
125. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for State Highway 79, Butterfield Stage
Road, De Portola Road, Street' A' and Meadows Parkway and shall be included in the
street improvement plans.
126. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersections of Meadows Parkway at
Street . A' and De Portola Road at Street . A' and shall be included in the street
improvement plans with the second plan check submittal.
127. Traffic signal interconnection shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer to show
1.1/2' rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200 foot centers along the
property fronting State Highway 79 and Butterfield Stage Road. This design shall be
shown on the street improvement plans and must be approved by the Department of
Public Works and Caltrans.
128, Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
129. Bus bays will be provided at all existing ami future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
130. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
131. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
S\STAFFRP'T\24182ALLCOA
17
~
L'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
-.
132. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
133. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
134. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property,
135. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
136. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
137. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
138. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grad;ng plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
15,1989.
139. gevelsJ3sr sAsII ,:Jay SA"' eapital fee fer reaEl iFflJ:1rS":SFABRts BAa ~t:lBlie laeilities iFR~eged
I:fPSR tAB prep eft", af prejse!. iRSlt:lEliRg tA8t fef tFsffie SAS p1:lslie tseilit", R=litigatisA 89
rSQl::tireEl t:lAEler tAB EIR/tJegative DeelaratisR fef tAB prejse!. TRe fee t8 Be I3sia 9RsII
Be iA tRB 8FA91:1Rt iA atteet at tl=18 tifftB at paYffl8At at tAe fee. If 8A iAterim af fiASI
fJt:lslie laBility FRitigatieR fee af Eiistriet RSs Rst BeeR fiAslI"/ 9stsslisReel S', tl=le Elate 8R
'Jd~liel=l e1e'/slsJ:1sr FBQ1:I8StS its tit:lilEliAg ,:IsrFRits fef tRB prejse! af BAY pl:lSS8 tl:lBrsef, tt=lB
eB\'sleper BRslI 8)(SSt:lte tAB :\gresFFlBRt fef PS'{FR8At at Pl::Islie Fasilit,{ fee. a aept" at
'xl:liet=ll:ts9 ~eeA ~revi8eef te 8e\'Ble~er. CeA9I:1rfsAtl"" \oJitt:l s)(sel:JtiAg tRis AgfsefflsRt,
S\STAFFRPT\24182AlLCOA
18 .-.
o..~
.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
~B..eI9per 5Rall pest a ~8R8 ta S8Sl:Jre paymeAt at tAB ('Idalia Faeilit"l fee. TAB 8FF18l:JAt
at tRB eaAS 9AsII Be t2.QQ per SEtld8r8 fe8t, Aat t8 B)(SSea t19,999, DS"/eleper
l:JASerstsRss tAB! saia AgreeFFl8At May ~e~tlire tRB I9S'{FF18At at fees iA aMeess at tAesa
Ae\~/ estiMates (aSS1:JFF1iAB I3sAefit 18 tRB prejse! iA tAB 8R=l8l:1At at Sl:J8R fees). B',
B)(S8I:ftisR at tRia :\gresFFl8At, Els'/sleper v,ill "J;ai"/8 SA" right 18 pretest tAB ,:Irs',,'isieAs
at tl=lis CSRsitieR, at tRia AgreeFRBRt, tAB ferFFlatisA at SA'I tFsffie iA=ll9set fee Elistriet,
aT tAB presase, le'l"l, af eelleetieR 9t SAY trellis FAitigatiaA af trel1ie iFRpaet fee fef tRis
I9rejeet; Brs',ieleEl tAst Ete'.eleper is Ast ":Iai':iAfj its right ta pretest tAB reaS8R8eleRBSS
at SAY trellis iFF! paet fee, BRS tl::1e am e~Rt tAera af. (Amended by Planning Commission
on November 16, 19921.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
140. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
141. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
142. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
143. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan.
144. The subdivider shall provide .stop. controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
145. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
146. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
147. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
148. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI. for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
The following traffic signals shall be constructed as warranted as part of the
reimbursement agreement at the following locations:
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU..COA
19
C\~
."
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A. State Highway 79 at the Interstate 15 ramps.
B. State Highway 79 at Pala Road.
C. State Highway 79 at Margarita Road.
D. State Highway 79 at Meadows Parkway.
E. State Highway 79 at Butterfield Stage Road.
F. Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road.
..
20
0.:'\
S\STAFfRPT\24182AU..COA .-
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24182,
Amendment No.3, First Extension of Time
Project Description: To subdivide 136.2 acres into
443 Single Family Residential, 21 Open Space and
4 Multi-Family Residential lots.
Assessor's Parcel No.:
926-130-036
926-130-037
926-130-038
926-130-039
926-130-040
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 . The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision phasing shall be subject to Planning Department Approval.
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copie'! of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Buildin;} and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy."
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this ErR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department."
S\sTAFFRPT\24182Au..COA
<\~
1
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
5. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
C. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures; A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with tho City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and revised October 3, 1992 shall be submitted to ensure
the implementation of the study to reduce ambienbnterior nois.e levels to 45
Ldn and exterior noise levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with Planning Department approval.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AlLCOA
<\0..
,.
2
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
-.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182, Amendment No.3, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, aA6 exterior of all buildings and
parkways. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
, O. . MaiAt8A8RS8 fer alllsAEisespseJ BAa spaR areas, iASh:IEliAg J3arlt\.~:a',s, sAslllae previEJea
fer iR tRe CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
11 . Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applic;antldeveloper
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (481 hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
3
WJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
13. A Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Streets G, H, S and the two future entrances to the
20.0 acre Very High Density Residential parcels.
14. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along Street A, Class II and DePortola Road, Class I.
15. A Major Project Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 35 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Lot 446.
16. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 452 and 460.
17. Minor Community Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 32 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 458 and 454.
18. A Landscaped Transition Area shall be constructed per Figure 13C of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for lot 450. This Landscaped Transition Area shall be
incorporated into a 25 to 40 foot minimum building setback for the development of
structures on lots 465, 466, 467 and 468 at the Plot Plan stage.
19. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
20. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 25 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for State Highway 79.
21. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23A of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Butterfield Stage Road.
22. Roadway landscape treatmentshall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for DePortola Road.
23. Roadway landscape treatment shall be cor,structed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
24. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scenes
including Meadows Parkway, DePortola Road and Butterfield Stage Road and State
Highway 79 shall use Deciduous Accent Grove Trees, Evergreen Bac~ground Grove
Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings identified on the plant palette per Section
IV,C.l.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
25. The LDZs along the Project Street Scene, Street A, shall use the plant palette per
Section IV.C,l.c.l. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
26. The landscaping for lots 458, 446 and 454 shall use the Accent Trees on the plant
palette in Section IV.C.1 .d.l. and 2. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
S\5T AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
4
\0\
v
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
27. The plant palette for Evergreen Background Grove Trees per Section IV.C.l.d.4.a of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 and the plant palette for Deciduous Accent
Grove Trees per Section Iv.C.l.b.2.a. shall be used for the landscape buffer zones in
lot 450.
28. The Very High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.c.l through 14 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
29. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV,C.2.b,2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3. These walls shall be
constructed along Butterfield Stage Road, State. Highway 79, Meadows Parkway,
Street A and DePortola Road.
30. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets G, Hand S.
31. The Medium High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.c.1. through 14. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
32. The Medium Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.d. 1. through 7. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
33. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.l.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets G, Hand S.
34. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.l.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
35. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.l.e of Specific Plan No, 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
36. PlaAtiAIJ sAslI 8eR=lfR8Aee as seeA 85 aler:>>es. are eefflpleteEl SR SR"" fieRieR af tt:te site
BREI BAsil J3reviae fer rSJilis sABr{ tefFA es'.erage at tAB slape as "". ell as leRg teFfR
estaalisRFReAt Bever per staAelaras set fertf:l iA OreliA8Ase 167.76. A JilsrfcrmsAse ~eReI
BAa II be seel:Jrea ';;itA tAB PlaARiAg [)SJ98RfRBAt pFier te iSSliBAse af SA)" graEliAg perfflits
te iRSl=lfB tf:le iAstallatisR sf tRia laABSeaJ9iRg. This 8SASitisA applies 8Aly if 8sAstrl:lstieR
at tAB site aees Rst 88fRFFl8Ree ~\'itRiA RiRe!", (99) 88""S at gFseliA@ BJilsratisRs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
37. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of the landscaping and prior to release of the dwelling
units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992).
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALL.COA
5
~
\01/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
38. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following grading operations. A performance bond shall
be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits to
insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5)
feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
39. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.l.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
40. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
41, Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings~ Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
42. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.l.,2., and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
43. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
44. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines. of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
45. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
46. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Development Agreement 92-
0013.
47. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Development Agreement 92-0013 or shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null and void.
48. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
S~TAF~4182AUlCOA
\rP
6
~
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
49. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the FiRal Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. TyjJical slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
O. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational areas, paseos, equestrian trails, monuments and the
Landscape Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping, walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval ofthe construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
I. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
J. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
K. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Pial"l No. 219, Amendment No.3.
L. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
M. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
50. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement), or any subsequent amendments.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
7
\t:A
L'
-'
L
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -
-.
51. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
52. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
53. A Private Active Participation Opportunity Area shall be constructed for lots 465, 466,
467 and 468. This area may include facilities such as pools, spas, cabanas, meeting
rooms, barbecues, wet-bars and kitchen facilities. This area shall be a minimum of
1.05 acres.
54. A Plot Plan shall be filed for the development of lots 465, 466, 467 and 468. The
individual developments within these lots shall be consistent with this plot plan,
55. All two-story residential structures shall maintain a 40-foot setback from the State
Route 79 right-of-way (this condition applies to single family dwellings only).
56. Lots 80, 81, 239, 240, 275 and 276 (which have side structure exposure) shall be
limited to one-story residential dwellings unless the 40-foot setback requirement
(identified in Condition No. 55) can be met during final site design.
57. The following conditions shall apply to lots 465, 466, 467 and 468:
A. Future multi-family structures located on the site sRet/IEl shall maintain a
minimum 40-foot setback from the property line along State Route 79 and a
minimum 30-foot setback from the property lines adjacent to Meadows
Parkway and . A. Street. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
1992).
B. Any future multi-family structures located within the 65 dBA noise level contour
shall be constructed .....itR Elet/sle 198ReEl wiRElews to maintain interior noise
levels at 45 dBA or less (refer to Wilber Smith Associates Noise Study dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent Study dated October 3, 1992).
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, .1992).
C. Any outdoor activity/recreation areas developed as part of the multi-family
residential project shall be located in the center portion of the site where
exterior noise levels would be below 65 dBA (refer to Wilber Smith Associates
Noise Study dated September 22, 1992 and subsequent Study dated October
3,1992).
OTHER AGENCIES
58. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
8
\t:J~
.-
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
59. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10,25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
60. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
61. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
62. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
63. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
64. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached,
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
65. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department (TCSDI
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
Prior to Recordation of Final MaDlsl
66. Prop~sed community park sites of less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA), until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. IAmended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
67. CSFflRU:.IAit., parl( sites af (2) seres Sf greater sRelles efferea fer aeeJieatisA te tA8 City
sf Te~eet:lla, CSFRR:U:.lAit", Serviees Depaftffi8Rt (TeED) fer FRSiAtsA8Rse pl:lrpeS8S
fell8\viAg eSFfl,:llisRee te euistiAg City stsASsras BAa eSFRflletieA af SA applieatisA
I3reeess. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
68. All proposed slopes, open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
9
\Oz.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
69. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider). shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
70. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater sAaII may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
71. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement,
72. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
73. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
74. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map will- may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
75. If t~e Cit", EAgiAser eleterffiiA8s tAst tAB J:1rejeet's street iFAJU8vsmsRt BaRel is
iAS1:IffieieAt te saver tAB J3arltvJs'( laA8Sea(3iAg aRa irrigati9A i~fJrei:emeAt9. t~B
as":eleper SRslI, f3rier te reeerelatisA at fiAal FRap, f38St a laAelseap8 f3erfefFA8ASe BaRB
'sAist:l sAslI Be releases eeA8t:JrreAtI-, V:itR the release af s1:IselivisisA perfsfmaAee
eeASs, gl::lsrsAteeiAg tFiB \'issility af alllsAsseat:)iAg iAstallesprier te tAB aeeept8Ree af
ffleiAteRaRee resl3eRsieility e., tRe TeS9. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992).
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of OccuDancv(sl
76. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee rellPonsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALL.COA
10
\,0\
v
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
77. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
78. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
79. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD,
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
80. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any c.onstruction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
81. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way,
82. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
83. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
,.
11
5\51 AFFRPT\24 182AU..COA
\fIb
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
84. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
85. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
86. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by. side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
87. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDESI permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
88. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality;
· Riverside County Flood Control District;
· Planning Department;
· Department of Public Works;
· CalTrans;
. General Telephone;
· Southern California Edison Company; and
· Southern California Gas Company.
89. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
90. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
91. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
92. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
S\STAFFRPT\24182Au..COA
12
\0'\
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
93. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
94. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b, Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite or offsite drainage
course.
c. The location of existing and. post development 100-year floodplain and
f100dway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
95. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
96. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
97. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
98. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right.
of-way.
99. A permit from Riverside County Rood Control District is required for work within their
right-of-way.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
100. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works,
101. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, streetlights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
S\STAfFRPT\24182AlLCOA
L'
13
~
\\0
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
-,-.
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
102. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Aowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B, Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401 .
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
j. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street .from the multi-
family residential site shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains.
103. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall t.e 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
104. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives within the multi-
family residential development shall be required for review and approval by the
Department of Public Works.
105. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
106. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU..COA
14 _-.
\.\",
.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
107. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
108. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
109. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
110. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and Slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
111 . As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
S\STAFfRPT\24182ALLCOA
15
,\,1--
,.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
112. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
113. Pedestrian access with sidewalks shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
streets "D", "F", "M", "N" and "W" to the adjacent public street.
114. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
115. Streets "G", "H" and oS' shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete pavement
with a raised 10-foot wide median, or bonds for the street improvements may be
posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City Standard
No. 104, Section A (70'/50').
116. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 04, Section A (60'/40').
117. De Portola Road and Street "A' shall be improved with 38 feet of half street
improvement plus one 12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with
City Standard No. 101, (100'n6').
118. Meadows Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road shall be improved with 43 feet of half
street improvement with a raised median, plus one 12-foot lane outside the median
turn lane, or bonds for the street improvements. may be posted, within a 110'
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 100, (110'186').
119. State Highway 79 shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter, asphalt concrete
pavement, and any reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by
Caltrans within a 71-foot half"width dedicated right-of-way per Caltrans letter ,dated
January 23, 1992.
120. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not constructed
by Assessment Dietrict No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the developer
shall construct or bond for all required improvements per applicable City Standards.
All Assessment District No. 159 improvements immediately adjacent to the
development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter into
a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all offsite
improvements necessary to serve the development.
121 . Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map,
122. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street" A" and De Portola Road.
S\STAFFRPT\241S2Al.L.COA
16
",?
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1-
123. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or. she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision, Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost, The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
124. Vehicular access shall be restricted on State Highway 79, Butterfield Stage Road, De
Port 01 a Road, Street" A" and Meadows Parkway and so noted on the final map with
the exception of street intersections and two (2) entry points to Street "A" for the
multi-family residential lots as shown on the approved Tentative Map and as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
125. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for State Highway 79, Butterfield Stage
Road, De Portola Road, Street" A" and Meadows Parkway and shall be included in the
street improvement plans.
126. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersections of Meadows Parkway at
Street "A" and De Port 01 a Road at Street "A" and shall be included in the street
improvement plans with the second plan check submittal.
127. Traffic signal interconnection shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer to show
1.1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200 foot centers along the
property fronting State Highway 79 and Butterfield Stage Road. This design shall be
shown on the street improvement plans and must be approved by the Department of
Public Works and Caltrans.
128. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
129. Bus bays will be provided at all existing anrl future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
130. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805,
131. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
S\STAFFRPT\241 B2Au..COA
17
\ \bt.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
-.
132. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint.use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
133. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
134. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
135. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreemant with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
136. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
137. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
138. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grad:ng plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
15,1989.
139. gsvelsJ3sr BASil PB"' SA", espital fee fer fess imprS"/smsAts aAs f:}l:fslie faeilities impasse
~peA tRB prsp8fty af prejse!, iASIl:JsiAfj tAst fer treflis BRa J3I:1Blie leeility R=litigatisA as
re~l:JifeeJ l:JASer tRB EIR/~Jegative geelsratisA fer tRB prejse!. TAB fee te l3e paiEi 91=1811
Be iA tAB 8RUJI:JRt iR attest at tRB time at PS"{fRBRt at tAB fee. If SA iAtsFim aT fiAsl
pl:fslie fasilit"( fRitigatisA fee af aistriet Ras Rst l:IesA fiAslI',' estal3lisRBs BO, tAB eate SR
'i.-RieR Eleveleper reEll:l8sts its l:n~JiIBiAg permits fer tAB prejset aT SAY pf:lase tl=tereef. tl=le
ae'JeleJ:Jsr 9A811 8)(Sel:lte tAB AgFsemBAt fer ,:IS'/meAt at Pl:IBlie Fasilit"/ fee. a asp'" af
i!:t:lieA Aas heaR ~re'Jiefeef te efe\'ele~er. CeReblrreRtl'(, iuitR BJf8Bt:ltiAg tRis .~greeFAeRt,
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
18
\~
."
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
as".'sleJier shall J:jsst a BeRs ta Seel:Jf8 J)aYMeAt at tRB Pl:Il3lie Faeilit", fee. TAB 8mBldAt
af t~e BeAB sAslI Be t2.9Q f3er SEll:f8Fe feat, Aet ta ensaee t1G,999. gevele13er
l::JRBerstsABS tAst Baia Agr:seFR8At FRS", reEll:lire tl=1e p8"1FReAt at fees iA s)(eess at tRBsa
AeON estiMates (aSSI::uTliAg eeAet;! ta tAB f3rejeet iA tAB amSl.:IAt sf S118A fees). B",'
s)(eS1:ItieR at tRia Agr:seFR8At, eJeveleJ3sr \vill 'Nab's SAY r:if:lAt t8 J3retest tAB f)rs'/isisAS
at tRis CSAsitieFl, at tl=lis :'greaMeR!, tAB fSFFRatisA at SA", traffie imf3aet fee aistriet,
Sf tl=le presses, 18'1"/, Sf eellsetieR afaR'; traffie FRitigatisA Sf trellis iFAf3set fee fer tRia
prejeet: ereo/issa tRst ae',..eleper is Ast ..~JaiviAg its (iliA! fa jaretest tAB reas8As13leA8ss
8f SAY tretlis iFRpset fee, aRe tAe 8ffiBI:JAt tf:1ereef. (Amended by Planning Commission
on November 16, 19921.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
140. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
141 . All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
142. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
143. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan.
144. The subdivider shall provide .stop. controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
145. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
146. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
147. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
148. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
The following traffic signals shall be constructed as warranted as part of the
reimbursement agreement at the following locations:
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
19
\\to
.-
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-,-.
A. State Highway 79 at the Interstate 15 ramps.
B. State Highway 79 at Pala Road.
C. State Highway 79 at Margarita Road.
D. State Highway 79 at Meadows Parkway.
E. State Highway 79 at Butterfield Stage Road.
F, Butterfield Stage Road at De Portola Road.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AlLCOA ,-
L"
20
\\."'-
-
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
Ie
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 92-94
A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING TIIE FIRST EXTENSIONS OF TIME
FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24182,
AMENDMENT NO.3, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
24184, AMENDMENT NO.3, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
. NO. 24185, AMENDMENT NO.3, VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT
MAP NO. 24186, AMENDMENT NO.5, VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 24187, AMENDMENT NO.3, VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24188, AMENDMENT NO.3 (EAST
SIDE MAPS) TO CREATE 443 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 21
OPEN SPACE AND 4 MULTIFAMILY LOTS (VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24182, AMENDMENT NO.3), 198
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 12 OPEN SPACE LOTS
(VESTING TEl\'TATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24814, AMENDMENT
NO.3), 351 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 18 OPEN SPACE
LOTS (VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24185,
AMENDMENT NO.3), 445 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 14
OPEN SPACE AND 1 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOTS (VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24186, AJ\1]j;NDMENT NO 5), 363
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 10 OPEN SPACE LOTS
(VESTING TEl\'TATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 24187, AMENDMENT
NO.3), 351 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, 26 OPEN SPACE, 1
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND 1 NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL LOTS (VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
24188, AMENDMENT NO.3) LOCATED TO TIIE SOUTII OF
PAUBA ROAD, NORTII OF STATE IDGHWAY 79, WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND EAST OF MEADOWS
PARKWAY. .
WHEREAS, Bedford Development Corporation fIled a request for the First Extensions
of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182, Amendment No.3, Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 24184, Amendment No.3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24185, Amendment
No.3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186, Amendment No.5, Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24187, Amendment No.3, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24188, Amendment No.
3 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision
Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extensions for the East Side
Rcso92.94
-1.
\\'b
Maps on November 16, 1992 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended approval of said Extensions of Time for the East Side Maps;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Time Extensions for the East Side Maps
on December 8, 1992, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing, the Council approved said Time
Extensions for the East Side Maps;
NOW, TIIEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCil.. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findin!!s. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
fmdings: .
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied. within a reasonable time.
b, There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B.
The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest AIea
RCI092-94
-2-
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
C. Pursuant to Section 7.1 of County Ordinance No. 460, no subdivision may be
approved unless the following findings are made:
1.
specific plans.
That the proposed land division is consistent with applicable general and
2. That the design or improvement of the proposed land division is consistent
with applicable general and specific plans.
3. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
type of development.
4. That the site of the proposed land division is physically suitable for the
proposed density of the development.
5. That the design of the proposed land division or proposed improvements
are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure
fish or wildlife or their habitat.
6. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements.
are not likely to cause serious public health problems.
7. That the design of the proposed land division or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through, or use of,
. property within the proposed land division. A land division may be approved if it is found that
alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that they will be substantially
equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to
easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent
jurisdiction.
A. The Council in approving of the proposed Extensions of Time for the East Side
Maps, makes the following findings, to wit:
East Side Maps (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182, Amendment No.3; Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 24184, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
24185, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186, Amendment No.5;
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 24188, Amendment No.3)
RCi092-94
-3-
\\C\.
1. There is a reasonable probability that the East Side Maps will be consistent
with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in
accordance with State law. The project, as conditioned, conforms with existing applicable city
zoning ordinances and development standards. Furthermore, the proposed density of the project
is consistent with the future General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Medium Density
Residential, Commercial and Public Institutional.
2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to, or interference
with the City's future General Plan, if the proposed use is ultimately inconsistent with the Plan,
since the surrounding land uses are single family dwellings, schools and vacant land.
3. The proposed use or action as conditioned complies with State planning
and zoning laws. Reference local Ordinances No. 348, 460; and California Governmental Code
Sections 65000-66009 (planning and Zoning Law).
4. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the
housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of the
residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code Section 66412.3) and
finds that the project density is consistent with SWAP and the future General Plan.
Additionally, it will provide more diversity in the housing type available to the residents of the
City of Temecula.
5. The proposed project will not result in discharge of waste into the existing
sewer system that is in violation of the requirements as set out in Section 13,000 et seq. of the
California Water Code since the project has been conditioned to comply with Eastern Municipal
Water District's requirements. .
6. The design of the subdivisions provide to the extent feasible, for future
passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision (Gov. Code Section
66473.1) by limiting the height of the future structures to 40 feet and requiring setbacks
according to the R-l standards.
7.
as conditioned.
The project has acceptable access by means of dedicated right-of-way and
8. The project is consistent with the intent of the original project approved
by the County of Riverside.
9. The maps are consistent with the provisions of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3.
10. Said Findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental
documents associated with this application and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact .
that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and
RC5092-94
-4-
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
1
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I .
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
Conditions of Approval.
A. As conditione{) pursuant to Section 3, the First Extensions of Time for the East
Side Maps are compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. An addendum has been prepare{) for this project
which identifie{) no additional impacts as a result of the changes in the project. Therefore, staff
has recommende{) Cenification of the Addendum to EIR No. 235.
Section 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecu1a City Council hereby approves First
Extensions of Time for the East Side Maps (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24182,
Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24184, Amendment No.3; Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 24185, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186,
Amendment No.5; Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187, Amendment No.3 and Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 24188, Amendment No.3 locate{) to the south of Pauba Road, north
of State Highway 79, west of Butterfield Stage Road and east of Meadows Parkway subject to
the following conditions:
A. Attachment No.6, attache{) hereto.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall cenify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AJ'I.'D ADO
this 8th day of December, 1992.
0=- \\.~~
atricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
A TIEST:
~o/~..fl)
J ne Greek, Ci rk
[SEAL]
Rno92.94
-5-
\'lP
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City
Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of December,
1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
4
NOES:
o
ABSENT:
1
R'5092-94
COUNCILMEMBERS: . Roberts, Stone, Parks, Munoz
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall
~. ..rA/' ~ - ~)
~ neS. Greek, Ci~ I~k
~
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
1
I
1
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24184,
Amendment No.3, First Extension of Time
Project Description: To subdivide 54.0 acres into
198 single Family Residential and 12 Open Space
Lots
Assessor's Parcel No.:
926-130-027
926-130-031
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.1 . The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision phasing shall be subject to Planning Department Approval.
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy."
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of T emecula Planning Department."
S\ST AfFRPT\241 82AU..COA
21
\1;\
5. Prior to issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following Conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
C. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUilDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent study dated October 3, 1992 shall be
submitted to ensure the implementation of the study to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 ldn and exterior noise levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with Planning Department approval.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
S\STAFFRPl\24182AU.COA
22
I
tJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
1
I
I
I
1
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies. appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24184, Amendment No.3, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and parkways.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
10. MaiAtoA8Aee fer alllandseaJ:)eel and Ol3eA areas, iAeh:JsiAg parlt"N8"(s, sRall Be Jue-/jeoe!
fer in tRe CC&Fl's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
11 . Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158. required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee. to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711 .4(c).
5\51 AFFRPT\24182AU..COA
23
\1Y
13. Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Streets B, D and E.
14. An Equestrian trail shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No. 219.
Amendment No.3 for north side of DePortola.
15. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along DePortola Road, Class I and Street A and Street C, Class II.
16. A Major Project Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 35 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Lot 203.
17. A Community Intersection Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 34 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 206.
18. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 208.
19. A Project Intersection Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 38 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 for lot 201.
20. A Secondary Paseo shall be constructed per the cross section on the map for lot 210.
21 . Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
22. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
23. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for DePortola Road.
24. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 26 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for StreetC.
25. The lDZs along the Project Street Scenes Streets A and C shall use the plant palette
per Section IV.C.l.c.l. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
26. The landscaping for lots 203 and 206 shall use the Accent Trees on the plant palette
in Section IV.C.l.d.l. and 2. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
27. Greenbelt Paseo Trees as identified in Section IV.C.l.d.4.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 shall be used for lot 210.
28. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.2.b.2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3. These walls shall be
constructed along Meadows Parkway, DePortola Road and Street C.
S\Sl AfFRPT\24 1 82Al1..COA
24
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
1
I
I
I
I
I
"
J
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
29. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets A, B, D and E.
30. An Equestrian Rail Fence shall be constructed per Figure 41 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 along the north side of DePortola Road.
31. The Medium Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.d.l. through 7. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
32. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.l.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets A, B, D and E.
33. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scenes
including Meadows Parkway and DePortola Road shall use Deciduous Accent Grove
Trees, Evergreen Background Grove Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings
identified on the plant palette per Section IV.C.l.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3.
34. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.l.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
35. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.l.e of Specific Plan No. 219.
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
36. PISAtiA!3 shall OSA1R1eAeB GIS seeR 85 slsJ3es are eemJ3leteet SA aFl~1 J3eFtieA af tAB site
BAa shall J3re~..ide fer rSJ3ia GAert term ee'~era~e at t~e sleJ3e as \'/811 as leA€, term
0stselisl1m8F1t es';er 13er standards set fer.fA iA OreiiABflee qe7 .76. P. J3erfermaAee eeRB
!Shall Be seslJreel'/:itR lAB PlanRing Del3srtmsAt I9rior to issuaRee af aA" 6raetiAfJ f3ermits
to insure the iAstallatieA af this ISA8sesJ':)iAg. This eeAsitien af3l3lies sAI', if eSAstrl:JstisA
af the site eees Ret B6AUReA6e v.'ithiA AiRel', (gO) aa',s ()f grsaiA6 6J3eretisAs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
37. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of said landscaping and prior to release of the
dwelling units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 19921.
38. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following grading operations. A performance bond shall
be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits to
insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5)
feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
5\51 AFFFIPT\24182AU.COA
25
\~~
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992).
39. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.1.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
40. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
41. Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
42. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.1.,2., and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
43. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
44. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
45. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
46. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7 .a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Planning Application 92-0013
(Development Agreement).
47. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreementl or shall be consistent
with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null
and void.
48. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
49. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the Final Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typical slope landscaping.
S\SlAFFRPT\24182AU.COA
26
-
.1
I
I
I
-
-
I
I
..
1
I
-
I
I
I
.-
-
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas.
private recreational areas, paseos, equestrian trails. monuments and the
landscape Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
I. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
J. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
K. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Plan.
l. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
M. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
. These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
50. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement). or any subsequent amendments.
51. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
5\51 AFFRPT\24' 82AlLCOA
27
\11'-
52. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
OTHER AGENCIES
53. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
54. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
55. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
56. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
57. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
58. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
59. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUilDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
60. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department (TCSD)
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
5\51 AFFRPT\241 82AU.COA
28
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Prior to Recordation of Final Mao(sl
61. Proposed community park sites of less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA), until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
62. CemffillAity 19ark site5 at (a) seres aT greater sAall ee sHe res fer aeEfieation to tRE City
sf Temeet:Jls, CemFfH::JRit,( Serviees DeJ3srtmeFlt (TeED) .fer ff'lSiAteABAse J3l::1TJ38SeS
fellev,iA~ eemJ3liaAee t8 e)ti5tiA~ City stBAElareJs BAa eemJ3letieA at BA BflJ3lieatieA
Ilreeess. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
63. All proposed slopes. open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
64. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider), shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
65. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater sAalI may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing. City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
66. Prior to recordation of final map. the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
67. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to .the recordation
of final map.
68. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
69. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map ~ may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
70. If the Cit'( EAoiAeer aetermiAes tABt tt=le (3rojcct's street im}':lrs"/emcnt bORe is
insufficient 18 ee-/er the parlnvu"( IflAdseaJ3iAt) BAS irrigatieA iffiJ3reveffiBAts, tRe
as-/elsf3er BRait J:1rier 1a rceeraatisA at fiRsl map. post a ISA8SeSJ3B performOAee BeAd
S\Sl AFFRPT\24182AlLCOA
29
~
\1,";)
,-,'hieh sRall be releases 8aAel:JrreAtly with the release a1 s\;fl3e1i'.'isiaA I3sr1arA=l8Ree
l3eASs, tJl:JsrsAtEEiAg ttle viaBility at alllaASsesf:)iRtJ iA6talleEf ~rier to tnE aeeeJ3t8Aee a1
maiRteAaRee resl3sAsibility by tRe TCED. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occuoancv(s)
71. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee responsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
72. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
73. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
74. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses. and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
S\Sl AffRPT\24 1 S2All.COA
30
I
-.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
..
1
I
I
.
I
I
J
.
.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
GENERAL REOUIREMENTS
75. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
76. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
77. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
78. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
79. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
80. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
81 . All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot. or other devices. as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
82. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
83. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
. San Diego Regional Water Quality;
· Riverside County Flood Control District;
. Planning Department;
· Department of Public Works;
. General Telephone;
. Southern California Edison Company; and
. Southern California Gas Company.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU..COA
31
\'1JP
84. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
85. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
86. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
87. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
88. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
89. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any on site or offsite drainage
courses.
c. The location of eXisting and post development 100-year floodplain and
flood way shall be shown on the improvement plan.
90. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
91 . The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
S\51 AFfRPT\24 1 B2AU..COA
32
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I I
I
~.
I
I
92. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
93. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
94. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
right-of-way.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
95. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
96. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
97. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving,
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalkl.
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401.
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALl.COA
33
\1--'"
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
98. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
99. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
100. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
101. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
102. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
103. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
104. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
S\Sl"AFFRPT\241 S2AU.COA
34
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl
I
I
I
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
1
105. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department; .
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
106. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
107. .Pedestrian access with sidewalks shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
Streets "K" and" J" through.the paseoto Street "H", and from the cul-de-sac terminus
of Street "G" to the adjacent public street.
108. All road easemimts and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
1 OS. Streets "B", "D" and "E" shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete pavement
with a raised 10-foot wide median, or bonds for the street improvements may be
posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City Standard
No. 104, Section A (70'/50').
110. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 04, Section A (60'/40').
111. Street" A" shall be improved with 44 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or bonds for
the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in
accordance with City Standard No.1 03, Section A (66'/44').
112. De Portola Road and Meadows Parkway shall be improved with 38 feet of half street
improvement plus one 12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with
City Standard No. 101, (100'/76').
5\$T AFFRPT\241 B2All.COA
35
\1b
113. Street "C" shall be improved with 42 feet of half street improvement with a raised
median. plus one 12-foot lane outside the median turn lane, or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted, within a 108' dedicated right-of-way in accordance with
Specific Plan Figure 5A "Gateway Road and modified City Standard No. 100,
(108'/84').
114. In the event that the required access improvements for this development are not
constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the
developer shall construct or bond for all required access improvements per applicable
City Standards. All Assessment District No. 159 improvements necessary for access
to the development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all
offsite improvements necessary to serve the development as deemed appropriate by
the Department of Public Works.
115. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
116. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street" A" and De Portola Road.
117. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or. she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
, 18. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Street" A", Street "C", De Portola Road and
Meadows Parkway and so noted on the final map with the exception of street
.intersections as shown on the approved Tentative Map and as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
119. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for De Portola Road, Street" A", Street
"C" and Meadows Parkway and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
, 20. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of De Portola Road at Street
"C" and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second plan check
submittal.
121. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
, 22. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
S\Sl AfFRPT\24 1 82AU.COA
36
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
123. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
124. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
125. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
126. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
127. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
128. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
129. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
130. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
131. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
30, 1989.
S\Sl AFFRPT\24 1 82AU-COA
37
\'Vo...
132, De'.'eleper sf:lallp8Y BAY aspitel tee fer resa ifRl3re'/eR<leAts SAa l3b1blie taeilities irTlpesed
lJl3SA tAe prsl3erty sr I3rejeet, iAeh.:Jt:Jing that fer traffie ana I3lJslie teeilit"," R<litioatieA as
rcql:Jirsa lJASer tf:.le EIR/~Jegati"e DeelaratieR fer tAe prejeet, TAB tee te Be pais sRall
Be iA tAB am8lJAt iA attest at tAe time 8t paym8At at tf:a8 fee, If SA iflterim sr fiRSI
plJslie taeility miti€latieA tee er EJistriet Aas Ret seeR fiRslly est8elisRBeJ tr," tAB Bate SA
l..-tRieR esvelsraer reQl:.Issts its BliileiAg permits ter the prsjeet sr aA)' I3hase tI~ereef, the
se'/elsper sAslI E!)(sel;.1te t~e AgreefflcAt ter I3s'jfReRt at Pl:.Il3lie Faeilirl fee, e e813'" at
tuhieA Aas seeR I9ravietee ta asveleper. CaAel:ureRtI'I, \VitA E!)(ssl:JtiAg tf::1is AgreemeAt,
se\"elaper sRall f38St a BeRs ta Seel:JrB pa'(ffleAt af tAe Pl::IBlie Faeilit', fee. The afR8l:JAt
af tRe baAs GAell Be *2.00 per 5E1l:.1Sre teet, Ret ta e)(eees t1S,OQO. De'/elaper
lJASerstsASs tRat saiel AgreemeAt mey reEll:.lire tl::ae pa','meAt at tees iR e)(eess af tRese
Ae':' estimates (aSSl::JfRiR6 l3eAetit ta tAe prajeet iA tAe am8wAt at Sl:JeR tees). B',.
s)(eekftiaA sf tRis .~greeR<leAt, sevelel3sr "^.m 'Nai\'~ SA" ri6Rt ta f3retest tf:le Jus',isieRS
8t this C8Aetiti8A, af this .^.greemeAt, tAB tarmstieA af SA'I traffie iffipaet fee eistriet,
sr tl=l8 ~reeess, le'/'I, er eslleetisA ef SA" traffie MitigatieR ar traffie ifR~aet fee tar this
~rajeet; ers'/issel that ete':eleper is Aet v/siviA6 its right ta pretest tAB reaseAsl3leAess
sf aRY !raffie ifflllaet fee, aRe tRe afflsllRt tRereef. (Amended by Planning Commission
on November 16, 19921.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
133. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior publiC streets,
134. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
135. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
136. The subdivider shall provide .stop. controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
137. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
138. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32'),
139. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
, 40. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy. the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
S\Sl AFFRPT\241 B2AU..COA
38
I
_I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV. and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
5\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82ALLCOA
39
\":P
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24185,
Amendment No.3, First Extension of Time
Project Description: To Subdivide 95.0 acres into
351 Single Family Residential and 18 Open Space
Lots
Assessor's Parcel No.:
926-130-032
926-130-033
926-130-034
926-130-035
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision Phasing shall be subject to Planning Department Approval.
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy."
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department."
S\ST AffRPT\24 1 82ALL.COA
40
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
5. Prior to issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following Conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety.
C, The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures, A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent study dated October 3, 1992 shall be
submitted to ensure the implementation of the study to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 Ldn and the Exterior noise levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with Planning Department approval.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
S\ST AFFRPT\241 B2AU-COA
41
\'?\
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24185, Amendment No.3 which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and parkways.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
10. MaiAteflBAse fer alllsA8seaf)ee BRS epeA areas, iAell:JaiAfI f3arllvr.'a'{S, sl=aall Be 13revielea
fer iR the CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
11 . . Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c),
S\Sl AffRPT\24 1 82AU.COA
42
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
1
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
13. Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Streets E, D, F and G.
14. An Equestrian trail shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for north side of DePortola.
15. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along DePortola, Class I and Street A, Band C, Class II.
16. A Major Project Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 35 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Lot 361.
17. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 354 and 356.
18. A Project Intersection Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 38 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 352 and 363.
'9. A Ele,:J8 TraAsitisA Area sRall t3e eeAstrl;.lstea J3er Fifll::lre 1 as at Speeifie PleA Ne. 21 Q,
l'.ffieAejFAeAt ~Je. a fer tAB AsrtAerl"( J3reJ3erty liRe at let <161. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 19921.
20. Secondary Paseos shall be constructed per the cross section on the map for lots 365
and 366.
21. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23A of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Butterfield Stage Road.
22. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for DePortola Road.
23. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
24. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street B.
25. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 26 of Specific Plan No.
219., Amendment No.3 for Street C.
26. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scenes
including Butterfield Stage Road and DePortola Road shall use Deciduous Accent Grove
Trees, Evergreen Background Grove Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings
identified on the plant palette per Section IV.C.l.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3.
27. The LDZs along the Project Street Scenes Streets A, Band C shall use the plant palette
per Section IV.C.l.c.l. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALL.COA
43
\?)V
28. The landscaping for lot 361 shall use the accent trees on the plant palette in Section
IV .C. 1.d. 1. and 2. of the Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
29. Greenbelt Paseo Trees as identified in Section IV.C.l.d.4.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 shall be used for lots 365 and 366.
30. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.2.b.2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, These walls shall be
constructed along Butterfield Stage Road, Street C and DePortola Road.
31. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets A, B, D, E, F and G (between DePortola Road and Street S).
32. An Equestrian Rail Fence shall be constructed per Figure 41 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 along the north side of DePortola Road.
33. The Medium Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV,C.3.d.l. through 7. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
34. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.l.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets A, D, E, F and G.
35. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.l.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
36. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.1.e of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
37. PISRtiA6 sAslI 88ffiffieA88 as saeR as slep8S are eemf3leteEl SA SA',' psrtiSfl at the site
BAEI sAall J)reviEle fer ral3iEl st-lert term eeverage 9f tAB slsras as ':/ell as leAg term
estat3lisAFAeAt ee-/er l3er stsAeJarSs set ferth if) OrefiA8Aee ~ &7.76. .~ perfermaAee BGRa
sAal1 Be s88I:Jres ',,:itA tAB PISAAiAg DeJ3artmeAt prier 19 iSSt:.I8Aee 91 BAY graEfiAg permits
1a iA5l:Jre tAB iAstallatisA 8f tRiG ISA8SesJ3iAg. TRis eeAsiti8A 8J3J3lies BAly if eeAstn:JetisA
of tAe site eees Ret E!81Tl1TleA8e witl=liA AiAety (BO) eta't'G af gr-BaiAg 8peratieAs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
38. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of said landscaping and prior to release of the
dwelling units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 1992).
39. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following grading operations. A performance bond shall
be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits to
S\51 AFfRPT\24' 82ALL.COA
44
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
1
1
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.-
I
insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5)
feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
40. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.l.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
41 . Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
42. Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
43. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.1,,2., and 3, of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
44. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
45. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IVI.
46. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
47. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7.a, and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opponunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Planning Application No. 92-
0013 (Development Agreement).
48. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or shall be consistent
with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null
and void.
49. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
45
\,?'?
50. A conceptual. landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the Final Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typical slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
.D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational area, paseos, equestrian trails, monuments and Landscape
Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
I. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
J. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
K. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Plan.
L. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
M. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
51. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreementl or any subsequent amendments.
S\STAFfRPT\24182AU-COA
46
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
1
I
J
I
I
, I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
52. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
53. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
OTHER AGENCIES
54. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
55. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
56. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
57. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined. in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated Janua~y 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
58. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
59. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
60. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUilDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
61. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department ("rCSD)
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below. or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
S\Sl AFFRFT\241 82AU.COA
47
\?f'-
Prior to Recordation of Final MaD(sl
62. Proposed community park sites of less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA), until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
63. CemFfH:JAit., J;lsrh. sites at fa) aeres aT greater sAall i3e efferea fer aeaiGatisA t8 tt:le Cit',
af TeFReelJla, Cemml::JAit"( Eer'Jiees DeJ3SrtmeAt (TeED) fer FflaiAteAaAee pl:Jrpeses
fells\viA!;j esmplisAee t8 eJdstiAg Cit", staR8ares BRei eempletisA af SA a13J3lieatisA
preee55. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
64. All proposed slopes, open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
65. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider), shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
66. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (31 acres or greater sAa* may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 19921.
67. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
68. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
. and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
69. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
70. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map wm may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 19921.
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82ALLCOA
48
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
ile
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
71. If tAe City EFlgiAser eetermiA8s tABt tAB I3rejeet's street imJ;lTS'/emeAt seAe is
iASL;JffieisAt t6 ee'Ier tAB J3arl(v;a',' larufsearaiA{J aAs irrigatieA impreV8m6Rts, tAB
els'/elef3er shall, J3rier t8 reeereiatisA af fiRsl mSI3, J3GS! a ISASses198 perferFT18Aee BeReI
lA'AiaR BAsil Be releasee eeA6l;JrFeAtly ~'itR tl=l8 release af SI;ll:llEfi~isi8A 1gerferm8Ase
BeRes, gl:lsraAteeiRg tAe 'liaBility af alllaA8sesJ3iAg iAstalleel prier t6 tAB aeeept8Aee af
fflaiRteR8Ree resllBAsi8i1ity By tRe TCE9. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921,
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occuoancvlsl
72. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee responsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
73. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
74. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
75. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency, All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
5\5T AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
49
\~
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
76. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all on site flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
77. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
78. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
79. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
80. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
81. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
82. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
83. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDESNotice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
84. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
. San Diego Regional Water Quality;
. Riverside County Flood Control District;
. Planning Department;
. Department of Public Works;
. General Telephone;
. Southern California Edison Company; and
. Southern California Gas Company.
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82AU.COA
50
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
85. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
86. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
87. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a we~dfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
88. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
89. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
90. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the. following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite or offsite drainage
courses.
c. The location of eXIsting and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
91 . The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
92. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
S\Sl AFFRPT\241 B2ALJ..COA
51
\?fo
93. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
94. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
95. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
Iight-of-way.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
96. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
97. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
98. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City. of Temecula standards
207/2.07A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401.
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
S~iAFFRPn241B2AULCOA
52
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
1
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
99. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
100. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
101. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
102. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence,
103. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
104. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
105. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, .signing, traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
53
\'?'\
106. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
107. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
108. Pedestrian access with sidewalk shall be provided from the cul-de-sac term.inus of
Street "L" through the open space to Street "H", and from the cul-de-sac terminus of
Street "R" to the adjacent public street "G".
109. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
110. Streets "B" at Butterfield Stage Road. "D", "E", "F" and "G" up to Street "S" shall be
improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete pavement with a raised 10-foot wide
median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
.right-of-way in accordance with modified City Standard No.1 04, Section A (70'/50'1.
Street "G" shall transition to 60-foot right-of-way at Street "a".
111. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 04, Section A (60'/40'),
112. Street "A" and Street "B" shall be improved with 44 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No, 103, Section A (66'/44').
113. De Portola Road shall be improved with 38 feet of half street improvement plus one
1 2-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted,
within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 101,
(100'/76').
S\STAfFRPT\24182ALLCOA
54
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
114. Street "C" shall be improved with 42 feet of half street improvement with a raised
median, plus one 12-foot lane outside the median turn lane, or bonds for the street
improvements may be posted, within a 108' dedicated right-of-way in accordance with
Specific Plan Figure 5A "Gateway Road and modified City Standard No. 100,
(108' /84').
115. Butterfield Stage Road shall be improved with 43 feet of half street improvement with
a raised median, plus one 12-foot lane outside the median turn lane, or bonds for the
street improvements may be posted, within a 110-foot dedicated right-of-way in
accordance with City Standard No.1 00, (110'/86').
116. In the event that the required access improvements for this development are not
constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the
developer shall construct or bond for all required access improvements per applicable
City Standards. All Assessment District No. 159 improvements necessary for access
to the development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all
offsite improvements necessary to serve the development as deemed appropriate by
the Department of Public Works.
117. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
118. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street" A" and De Portola Road.
119. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should faU to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
120. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Street" A", Street" B., Street .C., De Portola
Road and Butterfield Stage Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of
street intersections as shown on the approved Tentative Map and as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
121. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for De Portola Road, Street. A" , Street
"B", Street .C" and Butterfield Stage Road and shall be included in the street
improvement plans.
122. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of De Portola Road at Street
.C" and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second plan check
submittal.
S\STAFFRPT\241S2AU..COA
55
,,9J>
123. Traffic signal interconnection shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer to show
1-1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200-foot centers along the
property fronting Butterfield Stage Road. This design shall be shown on the street
improvement plans and must be approved by the Department of Public Works.
124. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
125. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
126. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No, 805.
127. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property,
128. Easements, when required for roadway .slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
129. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
130. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property,
131. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
132. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
133. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82AlLCOA
56
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
134. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
30, 1989.
135. De'/eleper 51=1811138'{ SAY eSJ3ital fee fer reas iFRprs'.-em8nts sAd I3bJslie {aBilities impasse
!:IpSA tRB prS138Fty aT prejeet, iAelbJEfiAg tRst fer traffie 8A~ pl:Islie teeili!',' mitigatisFl as
reEtl:JireEf l;.IAEler tf:l8 EIRJtJegative DeelarstisA fer tRB prajeet. TAB fee ta Be ,:JaiEf sRall
l3e iA the 8rT1Bl:JAt iA atte8t at tt:le tiFR8 af pS'imsAt af tt:le fee. If SA iRteriFR aT fiAsl
l3l:Jslie taeilit)' mitigati8A fee aT elistriet l=Ias Ret BeeR fiAslly estat3list=leef BY tRe aate SA
'lIhiet.l a8velsfJer rSE;Jl::Jests its l3l:JileliAg perFflits fer tAB prejeet aT SAY pRase tRereef, tAB
eJeveleper sRall 8)(eeblte tAB f.greem8At fer psymeAt at Pbll3lie Faeilit'( fee, a 8813'( af
'.':hieh Aas beeR I3rs,..ieJea ta eJe'/elsper. CeA8l;JrreAtl" I v\"itl:l 8)(eel:JtiAfJ tf:1is :\greeFFleAt,
ae-/elapar sAall pest a a8Ar:t t8 seel:Jre paymeAt af tAB P~l3lie Faeilit'( fae. TAB 8FR8t:JAt
af tAe 138Ar:t sAall ae t2.Q9 per s~~are feet, ASt ts 8)(eeer:t t1Q,OOO. [)e-/elsper
~Ar:terstaAEfs tABt saia .'\gfssmaAt FRa",' r8~l:Jire tl=le paym8Rt af fees iA a)(eBSS af tRess
A8i.... estimates {asSl:.IFRiAg 138Aefit t8 tAe prejeet iA tl=le am81:1At af S1:I8R fees}. 8-,
e)(eebltisA af this Agreem8At, aevelaper ":.:i11 "Nsi"'e BAY rigAt te pretest tAe pr8visisAS
st tRis CSAetitisA, at tRis Agreem8At, tAB farFRatisA af BA",' traffie iFRpaet fee elistriet,
ar tAB prseBss, le"l)', sr ealleetisA af 8A" tr:affie mitigatisA ar traffie impaet fee fer tt.lis
prejeet; Bre",iees tl:l8t Efevel8per is Rat i.vaiviAg its rigt:1t t8 pratest tAe reas8AalalenesB
ef aR'/ traffie iR'll3aet fee, aRs tRe aR'lel:lRt tRefeaf. (Amended by Plaiming Commission
on November 16, 19921.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
136. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
137. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
138. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
139. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan.
140. The subdivider shall provide .stop. controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
141 . All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
142. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
57
,qf.
143. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
144. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
S\Sl AFFRPT\24 1 82ALLCOA
58
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24186,
Amendment No.5, First Extension of Time
Project Description: Subdivide 114.1 acres into
445 Single Family Residential, 14 Open Space
Lots and 1 Elementary School Site
Assessor's Parcel No.:
955-130-011
926-130-028
926-130-029
926-130-030
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time e.xtension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision Phasing shall be subject to Planning Department Approval,
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy..
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department."
. S\ST AFFRPT\24182AlLCOA
59
\~o
5. Prior to issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following Conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations,
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety. .
C. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent study dated October 3, 1992 shall be
submitted to ensure the implementation of the study to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 Ldn and exterior noise levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with Planning Department approval.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
S\Sl AFFRPT\241 82AU..COA
60
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186, Amendment No.5, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and parkways.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992),
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
, O. MaintsABAee fer 811laA~seapeel BAS spaR areas, iASh:leJiAg parl(".~..a'/s, shall se pre.,jEtee
fer iR tRe CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16. 19921.
11 . Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25,00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 71 l.4(c).
S\STAFFRPT\241B2Au..COA
61
\~
13. A Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Streets C, B, T, F and D.
14. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along Meadows Parkway, Class I and Street A, Class II.
15. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 449.
16. A Paseo Entry Statement with Pedestrian Crossing shall be constructed per Figure 49
of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No, 3 for Intersection of Meadows and Street
D.
17. A Community Paseo shall be constructed per Figure 30 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for lots 451,452,457 and 460.
18. Secondary Paseo shall be constructed per the cross section on the map for lots 447,
456 and 458.
19. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No,
219, Amendment No. 3 for Street A.
20. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
21. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scene,
Meadows Parkway, shall use Deciduous Accent Grove Trees, Evergreen Background
Grove Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings identified on the plant palette per
Section IV.C.l.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
22, The LDZs along the Project Street Scene, Street A, shall use the plant palette per
Section IV.C.l.c.l. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
23. Greenbelt Paseo Trees as identified in Section IV.C.l.d.4.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 shall be used for lots 451,452,457,460,447,456,458 and
the intersection of Meadows and Street D.
24. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per figure 40; the finish and color of these
walls shall be consistent with Section IV,C,2.b,2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219.
Amendment No.3. These walls shall be constructed along Meadows Parkway.
25. Project Masonry Walls and Project View walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets A, B, C (between Street A and Street G, if it does not interfere with access to
any lots), T (between A Street and P Street, if it does not interfere with access to any
lots), F & D (between Meadows Parkway and Street N).
26. The Medium High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.c.l. through 14. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
S\S'T AFFRPT\24 182ALLCOA
62
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
27. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.l.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets A, B, C, D and F.
28. The plant palette for Evergreen Background Grove Trees per Section IV.C. 1.d.4.a of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 and the plant palette for Deciduous Accent
Grove Trees per Section IV.C.l.b.2.a. shall be used for the landscape buffer zones in
lots 461.
29. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.l.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
30. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV .C. 1.e of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix,
31. PlaAtiAg st:lall eSFFlFA8Ree as seeR as SlSP8S are eSFFlpleteEl SA SA"; pertieR af t~e site
BAa sAslI previae fer TspiEl sReA: teF~ eeo/srage 8f tf:\e slape as \\'811 85 !eRg term
estsl3lisAmeAt sever per stsAElaras set fer iFl OrEliA8Aee 167.76. .'\ perfefFFl8Ase l3eAEi
BAsil Be sesl:.Ireel ":,itA tAB PISAAiAg [)epsrtmeAt prier t8 iSSk:l8RSe af SAY gfseliAg permits
t8 iASl:Ir8 tAB iAstallatisA af this ISAElseapiRg. This 88AelitisA applies aRty if 8sAstr1:Jeti8A
8t tRB site se8s Rst eSFRFR8Aee\vitl=\iR AiRel",' (ge) 88"15 8f graEliRg eperatisAs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
32. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscapin.g shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of said landscaping and prior to release of the
dwelling units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 199~1.
33. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following the grading operations. A performance bond
shall be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits
to insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five
(5) feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (31 feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaced not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
34. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.l.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
35. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
S\STAFfRPT\2418.2All.COA
63
~'V
36. Wood fencing. shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
37. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.l.,2., and 3. of Specific. Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
38. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3,
39. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
40. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
41. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No, 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Planning Application No. 92-
0013 (Development Agreement).
42. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or shall be consistent
with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null
and void.
43. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
44. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the Final Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typical slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping,
D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational areas, paseos, equestrian trails, monuments and Landscape
Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
S\Sl AFfRPT\24 1 82AU_COA
64
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
fl
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
Ie
I
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition,
I. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
J. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
K. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Plan,
L. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch. box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the desiQn.
M. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans,
45. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be Consistent with Specific Plan No, 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement), or any subsequent amendments.
46. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
47. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
48. A Slope Transition Area shall be constructed per Figure 13B of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for the northerly property line of lot 461. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 1992).
S\ST AFFRPT\241 82Al.LCOA
65
\~~
OTHER AGENCIES
49. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
50. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
51 . The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
52. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
53. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
54. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
55. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUilDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
56. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department (TCSD)
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD,
Prior to Recordation of Final MaDlsl
57. Proposed community park sites of less than three (31 acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association IHOA), until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. lAm ended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921,
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 B2AlLCOA
66
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I-
I
58. CemmljAit'( f3srl( sites sf tal aeres aT fir-eater sAall Be sHe res fer aeelieatisA t6 the Cit'/
at Temsel:Jla, CerTu;.u:JAit'{ Ser-Jiees DeJ38rtFfl8At (TeED) fer maiRt8A8Ase J3l:1TJ38SeS
felle'lIiAD eSFRpliaAee t8 e)(istiA6 Cit." st8A8arels aRB eempletiefl af SA apJ9lieatisA
I3reeess. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
59. All proposed slopes, open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
60. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider). shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
61. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater sRaij may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992).
62. Prior to recordation of final map; the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
63. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
64. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
65. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map wiU may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
66. If tt-le Cit', EFlgiAser aetermiAes tl=-18t tAB J3rejeet's street iFf1J3reVeFfleAt 139REf is
iAsldffieisAt ta ee'ler tR8 l3ark'~:ay laAelsesJ3iAg BRei irrigatisA iFRprs\'8FR8Ats, tRB
eleveleper GRail, prier ta reeerelatieA at fiRsl fRBp. J3Gs! a ISf'l8S0SI98 psrfermsAse I3sAeI
~:JRieR BRall Be releases eSA8l:JrrsAtI.{ '.',itA tAB release at Sl:Il:JElivisisA J3srferFR8Aee
BeRes, gl::larsAteeiAg tAB "jal3ilit',' af all faAasBaJ3iR~ iAstalleEf prier te ttxae aeeept8Aee af
maiAteABAee resJ38Asieilit", 13'( tf::le TeED. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992).
S\ST AFfRPT\24 1 B2ALLCOA
67
\*
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of OccuDancv(s)
67. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee responsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
68. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy; the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
69. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
70. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REOUIREMENTS
71. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
S\S,. AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
68
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
.
I
.
I
.e
I
I
I
I
'.
.
I
Ie
I
72, An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
73. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
74. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
75. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
76. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
77. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921. .
78. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt,
79. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
· San Diego Regional Water Quality;
. Riverside County Flood Control District;
· Planning Department;
· Department of Public Works;
· General Telephone;
· Southern California Edison Company; and
· Southern California Gas Company.
80. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
81. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
S~TAF~4182AULCOA
69
\b>..~
82. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
83. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
84. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
85. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite or offsite drainage
courses,
c. The location of eXisting and post development 1 DO-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
86. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
87. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
88. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
89. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
90. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
right-of-way.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182AU.COA
70
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
tJ
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
91. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of th"e Department of Public Works.
92. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
93. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of TemecLila standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk),
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete. sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 4.00 and 401.
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
94. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
95. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
S\ST AFFRPT\241 82AlLCOA
71
\*
96. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
97. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
98. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
99. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
100. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,. traffic
signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
101. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District:
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans:
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
S\Sl AffRPT\24 1 B2AU..COA
72
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
102. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained. road.
103. Pedestrian access with sidewalk shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
Street "D", "J", "M", "P", "Q", "S" and "U" through the open space and paseo areas
to adjacent streets.
104. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
105. Streets "B" up to Street "G", "C", "D" up to Street "N", "F" and "T" up to Street "P"
shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete pavement with a raised 10-foot
wide median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City Standard No. 104, Section
A (70'/50'1.
106. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40').
107. Street" A" shall be improved with 44. feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or bonds for
the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in
accordance with City Standard No. 103, Section A (66'/44').
108. Meadows Parkway shall be improved with 38 feet of half street improvement plus one
12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted,
within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 101,
(100'/76'). .
109. In the event that the required access improvements for this development are not
constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the
developer shall construct or bond for all required access improvements per applicable
City Standards. All Assessment District No. 159 improvements necessary for access
to the development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all
off site improvements necessary to serve the development as deemed appropriate by
the Department of Public Works.
110. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
111. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street "A" and Meadows
Parkway.
S\STAFfRPT\24182ALLCOA
73
>..~
112. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act. Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost, The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
113. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Street" A" and Meadows Parkway and so noted
on the final map with the exception of street intersections and across the elementary
school site frontage as shown on the approved Tentative Map and as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
114. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Street 0 A 0 and Meadows Parkway
and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
115. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of Meadows Parkway at Street
"DO and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second plan check
submittal.
116. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
117. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
, , 8. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
119. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
120. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions.o
121. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
S~TAF~4'82AULCOA
74
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
-
Ie
I
I
I
-
i _
I
-.
II
-
I
-
-
I
-
I-
-
122. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
123. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement 'Nith the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
124. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
125. A precise grading plan shall be submitted tothe Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and .site conditions.
126. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substimtial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
15,1989.
127. Develsper sRall pay BAY eapital fee fer reaEl iml9rso.;emeAts BAS plo:IBlie faeilities impeseef
UJ38A t~e prepsr!', aT' f3rejeet, ifleh::leliAO that fer traffie BAS pldBlie teeilit", mitigati8R as
reElt:Jirea !:JABor tt:te EIRItJegative geelaratisA fer tAB prejse!. The fee t8 be paiEl st.lall
Be if) tke afFle~At iA attest at tAB time af f38ymeAt sf tl=\8 fee. If SA iAtefiFR aT fiAsl
J31:Jl3lie faBility mitigstieA fee aT efistriet ASS Rst BeeR fiAall", estaalisAea 1::1",' tAB Bate SA
\.,t=lief:l eleo,elsJ3er rSEl1d8sts its Bl;JileliAg permits fer tAB prejoot or SAY pRsse tAsTesf, tAB
aevelsper sAall e)(ee1:Jte the .~greemeAt fer J:1aymeAt af Pl:.Islie Faeilit', fee, a e9p', af
'ot.liet:l t.las t3eeA Jus-Jises t8 elevelsper. CSAelirreAtl'", ~'itt:1 e)(eelitiAg tl=1is ,\greemeAt,
aevelsJ3er sAall pest a BeRa t8 Seel::JTe ps',meRt sf tAe Public Facility fee. TAe amel::JAt
af tRB I:!SAS GAall he ~2.QQ J3eT S~liare feet, Ast ts al(eeeS $'10,000. De';eleJger
liAeJerstsA8s tl=18t saiel ,^.gfeeFReAt may TeE)l::Jire the J3a'(ffieAt at fees iA exeess at tt:1ese
AS'.', estimates (assl::JlTliAg eeAefit t8 tf:te f3rejeet iA tAe 81TlSI::JAt af sldel=l fees). B',"
0)(eel.;:JtisA af this AfjreSmeAt, eJe',elal3er ~'i11 '.vaive SAY figt:lt t8 J9retest tAe previsisAs
8t this C8AeJitisA, at this .~greemeAt, tAB fermatieA af SAY traftie impset fee Efistriet,
aT the pTeeess, levy, aT ealleetisA af SA" tTaffie fFlitigatiaA aT tTaffie iFRpaet fee fer tRis
J3rejeet; BTsviefaa tA8t efe',elsl3er is Ast 'NsiviAg its right t8 pretest tt.le reasBAst3lsAess
af aAY traffie ifRllaet fee, aAa tRe afRa\,lAt tRereaf. (Amended by Planning Commission
on November 16, 19921.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182AU-COA
75
\/>t..~
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
128. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
129. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
130. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
131. The subdivider shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
132. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide fo( minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
133. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
134. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
135. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU.COA
76
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24187,
Amendment No.3, First Extension of Time
Project Description: To Subdivide 74.6 acres into
363 Single Family Residential and 10 Open Space
Lots
Assessor's Parcel No.:
955-030-008
955-030-009
955-030-010
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, .upon written request, if made 30 days prior to. the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision phasing shall be subject to Planning Department Approval.
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy."
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department."
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82AlL.COA
77
\~o..
5. Prior to issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following Conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety. .
C. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
. superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent study dated October 3, 1992 shall be
submitted to ensure the implementation of the study to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 Ldn and exterior levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall
be permitted with Planning Department approval.
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents. officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82AU.COA
78
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24187, Amendment No.3, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, ext'erior of all buildings and parkways.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
10. MaiRteRaAee fer alllsA8Sea13eel sAa Sl3eA areas, iAeh:JsiAg parh:.~..a'(5, sRall Be previeJeEl
fer iR t"'e CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
11. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shalr deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00) fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
S\ST AFFRPT\241 82Au..COA
79
,.g>
13. A Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Streets B, C, D and E.
14. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along Meadows Parkway, Class I and Street A, Class II.
15. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 365.
16. A Community Paseo shall be constructed per Figure 30 of Specific Plan No. 219,
. Amendment No.3 for lots 369.
17. A Secondary Paseo shall be constructed per the cr9ss section on the map for lots 372
and 373.
18. A Paseo Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 39 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for lot 369.
19. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
20. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
21. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scene,
Meadows Parkway, shall use Deciduous Accent Grove Trees, Evergreen Background
Grove Trees and Informal Street Tree Groupings identified on the plant palette per
Section IV.C.1.b.2.a., b. and c. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
22. The LDZs along the Project Street Scene Street A shall use the plant palette per
Section IV.C.1.c.1. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
23. Greenbelt Paseo Trees as identified in Section IV.C.1.d.4.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 shall be used for lots 369, 372 and 373.
24. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.2.b.2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3. These walls shall be
constructed along Meadows Parkway.
25. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets A, B, C, D, and E.
26. The Medium High Density Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.c.1. through 14. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
27. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.1.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets A, B, C, D and E.
S\ST AFfRPT\24 182AU.COA
80
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
28. The plant material palette identified in Section IV.C.1.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
29. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.1.e of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
30. PISfltiAg GAall 88FRR=teA88 as seeR 85 slepes are eempleteel SA aA~. I3srtiSA af tl=\8 site
aAa sAsII J3rs\'iefe fer rapief sAeft term 8S'JarBge af tAB.slsJ3e as lyvell as leRg term
estsslisRmeAt sever per st8Asaras set fer iA OrEliA8Aee ~e7.7B. A perferFR8Aee BeREI
sRaUse seel:.lrea '.",itt::! tAB PISAAiAg DepartFR8At prier t6 iSSl:.I8Aee af SAY graEliAfJ permits
t8 iASliT8 tAB iAstallatisA at tRia laA8sea,:JiAg. TRia eSAsitisA 8J3l3lies BAI'; if eSAstrw8tisA
af tAe site Efees Rst S8ffifReAe8 '/ljtRiA AiRety (BO) eta'fs at graefiAg 8psratisAs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
31. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of said landscaping and prior to release of the
dwelling units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16.1992).
32. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the site during and following the grading operations. A performance bond
shall be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits
to insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five
(5) feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaces not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at eQ'uivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 1992). .
33. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.1.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
34. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
35. Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
36. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.1.,2., and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
S\sTAFFRPT\24182Au..COA
81
,/0'
37. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
38. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
39. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
40. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Planning Application No. 92-
0013 (Development Agreement).
41. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or shall be consistent
with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null
and void.
42. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
43. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the Final Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typica.1 slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational areas, paseos. equestrian trails, monuments and Landscape
Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
H. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182AU.COA
82
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
J. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Plan.
K. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
L. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
M. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
44. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with Specific Plan. No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or any subsequent amendments.
45. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Rsh and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
46. Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
OTHER AGENCIES
47. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
48. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
49. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
83
\-)V
50. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
51. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
52. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
53. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unifi~d School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
54. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community Services Department (TCSD)
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set forth below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
Prior to Recordation of Final MaD!sl
55. Proposed community park sites of.less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA), until offered and accepted by the.TCSD
for maintenance purposes. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16,
19921.
56. Cemml:lAity I3Srl( sites af (3) aeres Sf €jreater sl:1alll:le effereeJ fer aeelieatieA t8 tt:le City
"af Temeewla, Cemml:JAity Serviees DeJ3SrtmeAt (TCSD) fer FflsiRteR8Ree )3l:Jrp8SeS
fe"e\-,in~ eSFflJ3lisAee t8 e)(istiAfI City stSABSft:lS BRei eemJ3letisA af SA BJ3plieatieR
~reee55. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
57. All proposed slopes, open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
58. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider), shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
59. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater sAaU may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU.COA
84
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 19921.
60. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
61. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
62. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSD) identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
63. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map wm may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 19921.
64. If tRe Cit.( Efl~iFleer ssterrl-liA8S tl:18t tAe ,:Jrejeet's street ilflJ3rev8m8At heR8 is
iA5l:JffieieAt te eever tJ:.e J3arl(\~Ja)' ISASseSl3iA!jJ BAS irrig8tieA ifRl3reVem8Ats, tAs
ae-Jalapsr BRslI, prier Ie reeereatieA af fiRsl fR813, 138St a ISA8Sea138 perfermaAee eaRS
\vl=lieh sAslI 138 releases 8eR8b1rreAtly ....:itl::1 tRe release a1 sblsl:fivisisR J3erfermSAee
seRes, €ll:Jsr:sAteeiAg tt:le viaBility af alllsAets8sJ3iR@ iRstalleeJ J:1rier te tAB aeeel3tsAee af
FRaiRteR8Ree reS198RSillility Ily tRe Tegg. (Amended by Planning Commission oil
November 16, 19921.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of OccuDancv(sl
65. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee responsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. . Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
66. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
S\STAFFRPT\24' B2ALLCOA
85
--()b
General
67. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF. TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
68. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REOUIREMENTS
69. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
70. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
71 . A copy of the grading and improvement plans. along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
72. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
73. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
S~lAF~4'B1AULCQA
86
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
.
.-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS:
74. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
75. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16.
1992).
76. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
77. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the following agencies:
. San Diego Regional Water Quality;
. Riverside County Flood Control District;
· Planning Department;
. Department of Public Works;
· General Telephone;
. Southern California Edison Company; and
. Southern California Gas Company.
78. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations. for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
79. An erosion control plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
80. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
81. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
82. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALl.COA
87
\~
83. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite or offsite drainage
courses.
c. The location of eXlstmg and post development 100-year floodplain and
flood way shall be shown on the improvement plan.
84. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
85. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
86. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
87. An Encroachl)'lent Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
88. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
right-of-way.
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
89. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted laccomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
90. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, ~treets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
S\STAFFRPT\24182Au..COA
88
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
91. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401.
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
H. All street. and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
92. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
93. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208.
94. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
95. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
96. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
97. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
S\STAFfRPT\24182AlLCOA
89
\'95
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
98. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing and other
traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
99. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
100. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
101. Pedestrian access with sidewalk shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
Streets "G", "H", "L", "M", "N", "R", "S" and "T" through the open space and paseo
areas to adjacent streets.
S\STAFfRPT\24182ALLCOA
90
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
102. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
103. Streets "B", "C', "D" and "EO shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement with a raised 10-foot wide median, or bonds for the street improvements
may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City
Standard No. 104, Section A (70'/50').
104. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 104, Section A (60'/40').
105. Street" A" shall be improved with 44 feet of asphalt concrete pavement, or bonds for
the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in
accordance with City Standard No.1 03, Section A (66' /44').
106. Meadows Parkway shall be improved with 38 feet of half street improvement plus one
12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted,
within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance. with City Standard No. 101,
. (100'/76').
107. In the event that the required access improvements for this development are not
constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map, the
developer shall construct or bond for all required access improvements per applicable
City Standards. All Assessment District No. 159 improvements necessary for access
to the development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all
offsite improvements necessary to serve the development as deemed appropriate by
the Department of Public Works.
108. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
109. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street 0 A 0 and Meadows
Parkway.
110. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have. been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
91
,-6&
111. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Street" A" and Meadows Parkway and so noted
on the final map with the exception of street intersections as shown on the approved
Tentative Map and as approved by the Department of Public Works.
112. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Street" A" and Meadows Parkway
and shall be included in the street improvement plans.
113. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
114. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
115. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
116. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
117. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
118. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
119. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
120. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
121. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182Al1..COA
92
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
122. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
123. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
15, 1989, for Tentative Tract Map 24186.
124. De-/slaper shall pa', SA" eSJ3ital fee fer reaef impreV8m8Ats BAS pwl3lie laBilities imJ38seEl
Wp8A tAe preperty af prejser, iRell::JeliAg that fer tFsffie BREI pl:l13lie fasilit'( miti!JstisA as
reEtl:lirea b1ABeT the EIR/rJe@8ti-/8 DeelaratisA fer tt:le prejser. The fee t8 Be pais BAsil
Be iA tAB 8fflBldAt iA atteet at the time at ps,,.m8At at tAe fee. If SA iAterim af fiRsl
pl:.Islie feeili!"! mitigatisA fee Sf ejistriet has Ret l3eeA fiAslly estal3list=Jeef l3y tt:Je Bate SA
~'/Aief:l eleveleper reEtl.:Jests its 13l:JiletiAg permits fer tAB prejeet af BAY pl:lase fRSTest, tAe
eJe'/elsf)er 51:1811 8)(eewte tt-le :\greeffl8At fer PSYFFl8Rt af Pl::Islie Faeilit'/ fee, a 8ap'" a1
'.':AiaR t:las l3eeA pre'/iefeEl ta eleveleper. CeA8l:JrreAtl'l, vdtt.l e)(88t:.1tiAg tl:tis .'\greemeAt,
ae'/elsJ3er sRall J3sst a heRS te see1:Jre pS"FA8At af tAB Pl:IhliB Faeilit"( fee. TAB 8ffiel:JAt
et tAC BORa shall l3e t2.00 per s~l:Iare teet, Ret te e)(eeea $ 1 O)JOO, De'/elsper
l:IASerstSF'I(:ls that saia AgreemeAt may rBEt1::Jire tAB PS'(FRBAt at tees iF} e)f8BSS af tAesa
Ae'/I estimates (assl:IFAiAg l3eAefit te tt:Je prajset iF! tt;:)e aFR8l::JF!t af st:JeA fees), By
e)(ee~tisA at tAis A{:IreemeAt, Ele',el<<;Jt:Jer '.vill \,,'aive aA" Tigf:1t te fjTetest tt:ae I3rs',isieAs
et tt:lis CeAditisA, et tAis ,~greeFAeAt, tAB terR=latieA at SA" traffie impaet fee Elistriet,
er tAB preeess, le-,y, aT eelleetieA af SAY traffie mitigatiaA ar trattie ilT\pset fee fer tt:lis
prejeet; ere'lietes tAst ~evel8JiJer is Rat v/ei'/iAg its ri{:lAt t9 pretest tt.1e ress8As131eAess
ef aRY traffie iFRf3set fee, aRB tRe aFRel:lRt tRereef. (Amended by Planning Commission
on November 16, 1992).
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
125. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
126. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
127. The subdivider shall provide .stop. controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
128. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
93
\-51.
129. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
130. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
131. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
S\ST AFFRPT\241 82AU-COA
94
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
tJ
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No: 24188,
Amendment No.3, First Extension of Time
Project Description: To Subdivide 127.1 acres into
351 Single Family Residential, 26 Open Space
Lots, 1 Elementary School Site and 1
Neighborhood Commercial Lot
Assessor's Parcel No.:
955-030-002
955-030-003
955-030-004
955-030-006
955-030-007
Approval Date:
December 8, 1992
Expiration Date:
December 8, 1994
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, unless modified by the conditions listed
below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and
City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
2. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map.
3. Subdivision Phasing shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
4. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the
Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. The following notes
shall be placed on the ECS:
A. "This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute
of Technology, Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy."
B. "EIR No. 235 and an Addendum to this EIR was prepared for this project and
is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department."
S\STAFFRPT\241 B2AlLCOA
95
\-S~
5. Prior to issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following Conditions shall be satisfied:
A. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an
overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for
approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading
plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following:
(1) Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation
during and after the grading process.
(2) Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which
may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January
through March.
(3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
(4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase.
B. The developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that
all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and
that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the
Director of Building and Safety. .
C. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying
the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be
. superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the
payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the
fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County
ordinance or resolution.
6. Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied:
A. No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within
the project boundary until the developer or its successor's-in-interest provides
evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of
one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as
mitigation for public library development.
B. With the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety
a copy of the acoustical study prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated
September 22, 1992 and subsequent study dated October 3, 1992 shall be
submitted to ensure the implementation of the study to reduce ambient interior
noise levels to 45 Ldn and exterior noise levels to 65 Ldn.
C. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the
residential portion of the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other
energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval.
Roof-mounted equipment may be allowed for commercial structures if they are
architecturally screened from view from the adjoining streets and properties.
S\Sl AFFRPT\24 182AlLCOA
96
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
7. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officer, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officer, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul an
approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative
body concerning Vesting Tentative TractMap No. 24188, Amendment No.3, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code
Section 66499.37. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the subdivider of any
such claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully
in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim,
action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not,
thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
8. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning Department prior to final map recordation of the tract maps. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and parkways.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
9. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation,
association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right
to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or
. interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development,
such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with
authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include
compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of
assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded
CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City of Provisions required by the City as
Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
10. MaiAteA8Ree fer alllar:u:JseapeEf BREI Bf38A areas, iAel~eliAg l3arl('N8YS, sl:lall1ge prerJiaeEl
fer iR tRe CC&R's. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16. 1992).
11. Every owner of a dwellin9 unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling
unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) as
share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common
areas and facilities.
12. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of this project, the applicant/developer
shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check or money order payable to
the County Clerk in the amount of Eight Hundred, Seventy-Five Dollars ($875.00)
which includes the Eight Hundred, Fifty Dollar ($850.00l fee, in compliance with AB
3158, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(31 plus the Twenty-Five
Dollar ($25.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 Cal. Code
of Regulations 15094. If within such forty-eight (481 hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
97
,-Sf!.
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be void by reason of failure of
condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
13. A Neighborhood Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 37 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3 for Streets D, B, E, M, N, Wand BB.
14. An Equestrian trail shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for south side of Pauba Road.
15. Bicycle trails shall be constructed per Figure 6 of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3 along Meadows Parkway, Class I and Streets A, AA, K and Pauba Road, Class
II.
16. Major Community Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 32 and 33 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 357.
17. Minor Project Entry Statements shall be constructed per Figures 35 and 36 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 364, 365, 378 and 354.
18. A Minor Community Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 32 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lot 360.
19. A Project Intersection Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 38 of Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 for lots 380 and 369.
20. A Slope Transition Area shall be constructed per Figure 138 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No. 3 for the westerly property line of lot 362 and the northerly and
westerly property lines of lot 367.
21. A Landscaped Transition Area shall be constructed per Figure 13C of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for the southerly boundary of lot 362.
22. A Community Paseo shall be constructed per Figure 30 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for lot 374.
23. A Paseo Entry Statement shall be constructed per Figure 39 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 for both ends of lot 374.
24. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23C of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Butterfield Stage Road.
25. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street AA.
26. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Street A.
27. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 27 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for southerly side of Street K.
S\SlAFfRPT\241 B2AU.COA
98
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
28. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 28 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for northerly side of Street K except as noted on the map.
29. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 23B of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Meadows Parkway.
30. Roadway landscape treatment shall be constructed per Figure 24 of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 for Pauba Road.
31. The Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) along Major Community Street Scenes
including Meadows Parkway, Pauba Road and Butterfield Stage Road shall use
Deciduous Accent Grove Trees, Evergreen Background Grove Trees and Informal Street
Tree Groupings identified on the plant palette per Section IV.C.1.b.2.a., b. and c. of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
32. The LDZs along the project street scenes Streets A, AA and K shall use the plant
palette per Section IV.C.1.c.1. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
33. The landscaping for lot 357 and 360 shall use the accent trees on the plant palette in
Section IV.C.1.d.1. and 2. of the Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
.34. Greenbelt Paseo Trees as identified in Section IV.C.1.d.4.a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.3 shall be used for lot 374.
35. The plant palette for Evergreen Background Grove Trees per Section IV.C.1.d.4.a of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 and the plant palette for Deciduous Accent
Grove Trees per Section Iv.C.1.b.2.a. shall be used for the landscape buffer zones in
lots 362 and 367.
36. Community Theme Solid Walls or Community Theme Tubular Steel Open Fence or a
combination of the two shall be constructed per Figure 40 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3; the finish and color of these walls shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.2.b.2.e. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3. These walls shall be
constructed along Butterfield Stage Road, Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway.
37. Project Masonry Walls and Project View Walls shall be constructed per Figure 41 of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3; these walls shall be constructed along
Streets A, K, AA, 0, B (between Street A and Street C, if it does not interfere with
access to any lots), E (between Street K and Street J, if it does not interfere access
to any lots), M, Nand W (between Street A and Street Z, if it does not interfere with
access to any lots) and BB.
38. An Equestrian rail fence shall be constructed per Figure 41 of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 along the south side of Pauba Road.
39. The commercial use landscape requirements shall be consistent with Section
IV.C.3.b.1., 2. and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
40. The Medium Oensity Residential landscape requirements shall be consistent with
Section IV.C.3.d.1. through 7. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82ALLCOA
\~
99
41. The accent trees identified in Section IV.C.1.d.3. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used for the landscaping for Streets AA, K. BB, W, N, M.
A, E, Band D.
42. A 25 to 40 foot minimum building setback, as determined in the Plot Plan stage, shall
be allowed along the southern and western property lines of lot 362, a minimum of 20
feet of landscaping shall be required within this setback.
43. The plant material palette identified in Section IV .C. 1.e. of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 may be used in conjunction with all other specified plant palettes.
44. The seed mix for Turf Grass identified in Section IV.C.1.e of Specific Plan No. 219,
Amendment No.3 shall be used throughout the project. Comparable sod may be used
instead of the seed mix.
45. PISAtiAg sRall 88fAFR8A8B as seeR 85 slaJ:)8S are eSfApleteEf SA SAY p8ftiSA af tAB site
BAa SAsH previae fer rSJ3jef sl=lert terFfl eeversfJe af tAB slape as ~~'ell as teAt) term
estsalist:lmeAt ee-/er f3er stsAEtarels SGt fertt.'t iA OreliA8Ree 167.76. ^ I3srferm8Aee BaAeI
5Rsl113e seel:JreSlf/itf:l tAe PISAAiA{I gep8FtFR8At prier t8 iSSl;:iSAee at SAY gfssiAg permits
t8 iASl:Jre tAB iAstallatisA af tf:lis laAelsC8f3iRg. TRis 8BAefitisA applies BAl'; jf 8sAstrl:JetisA
af tAB site sees Rat eemm8Aee ...:ithiA AiRel', (9G) says af graeliAg 8l3eratisAs.
(Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 1992).
46. A performance bond and a one year maintenance bond shall be required for all
landscaping installed except for landscaping within individual lots. The amount of this
landscaping shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. This bond
shall be secured after completion of said landscaping and prior to release of the
dwelling units tied to the timing of the landscaped area. (Amended by Planning
Commission on November 16, 1992).
47. Erosion control planting shall commence as soon as slopes are completed on any
portion of the. site during and after the grading operations. A performance bond shall
be secured with the Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading permits to
insure the installation of this landscaping. Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5)
feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or greater than three (3) feet in vertical
height shall be planted with a ground cover to protect the slope from erosion and
instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (15) feet in vertical height shall be planted with
shrubs, spaces not more than ten (10) feet on center or trees spaced not to exceed
twenty (20) feet on center or a combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent
spacings, in addition to the ground cover. Other standards of erosion control shall be
consistent with Ordinance No. 457.57. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 1992).
48. Irrigation for the project site shall be consistent with Section IV.C.1.j. of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
49. Community Theme Walls may be substituted for Project Theme Walls at the developers
discretion.
S\Sl AFFRPT\24 1e2AU,COA
100
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
,I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
50. Wood fencing shall only be allowed along the side yards and the rear yards of single
family dwellings. Project Theme Walls shall be used along the side yards facing the
street for corner lots.
51. The residential lot street tree requirements and front yard requirements shall be
consistent with Section IV.C.3.a.1.,2., and 3. of Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment
No.3.
52. All lighting within the project shall be consistent with Section IV.C.5 of Specific Plan
No. 219, Amendment No.3.
53. All future development on this site will require further review and approval by the City
of Temecula. These developments shall be consistent with the Purpose and Intent of
the Architecture and Landscape Guidelines set forth in the Design Guidelines of
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3 (Section IV).
54. All future development within this project shall comply with applicable Zoning
Ordinance Standards adopted for Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3.
55. The amenities and standards identified in Section III.A.7 .a. and b. of Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No. 3 for parks, recreation areas, activity nodes, private active
participation opportunities, open space, greenbelt paseos and parkway paseos shall be
used for developing these areas or as modified by the Planning Application No. 92-
0013 (Development Agreement).
56. Maintenance and timing for completion of all open space areas shall be as identified
in Planning Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or shall be consistent
with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.3, if the Development Agreement is null
and void.
57. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to recordation of the Final Map.
58. A conceptual landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
recordation of the Final Map for review and approval. The following needs to be
included in these plans:
A. Typical front yard landscaping for interior, corner and cul-de-sac lots.
B. Typical slope landscaping.
C. Private and public park improvements and landscaping.
D. All open space area landscaping including, private and public common areas,
private recreational areas, paseos, equestrian trails, monuments and Landscape
Development Zones.
E. All landscape plans shall identify the number and size of all plants, the type of
irrigation to be used, all hardscaping, fences and walls.
S\ST AFfRFT\24 1 82ALLCOA
101
\(,\
F. The timing for installation of all landscaping walls and trails shall be identified
prior to approval of these plans.
G. The responsibility for installation of all landscaping and walls shall be identified.
H. All private open space areas that will not be dedicated to the City as identified
in the Development Agreement shall be developed as an integrated part of the
open space lot that they are a part of and shall be consistent with the
provisions of the Specific Plan.
I. Fifty (50) percent of all trees planted within the project shall be a minimum of
twenty four (24) inch box. The landscape plans proposed for each phase shall
incorporate the fifty (50) percent mix of twenty four (24) inch box trees into
the design.
J. A note shall be placed on the conceptual landscape plans that all trees shall be
double staked and automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaping.
These provisions shall be incorporated into the construction plans.
K. A note shall be added to all conceptual landscape plans that all utility service
areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping. This
equipment shall be identified on the construction landscape plans and shall be
screened as specified on this condition.
L. The plant heights at sensitive locations for traffic safety shall be subject to the
approval of the Public Works Department.
M. The timing for submittal and approval of the construction landscape plans shall
be identified for all improvements within this condition.
59. The development of this project and all subsequent developments within this project
shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 3 and Planning
Application No. 92-0013 (Development Agreement) or any subsequent amendments.
60. If the Gnatcatcher is listed as an endangered species, proper studies and mitigation
measures shall be necessary prior to issuance of grading permits. These studies and
mitigation measures shall be acceptable to Fish and Game and/or Fish and Wildlife.
61 . Double-pane window treatment shall be required for second floor elevation windows
in any two-story homes constructed on the lots identified in the Acoustical Study
prepared by Wilber Smith Associates dated September 22, 1992 and its supplement
dated October 3, 1992.
62. All Parcels in Planning Areas 25 and 26 that abut a portion of Butterfield Stage Road
that are designed with a Landscape Development Zone (LDZ) of less than 32 feet shall
be developed with single story single family dwellings.
63. A sign program shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department prior to
issuance of building permits for lot 362.
S\S"T AfFRPT\24' B2AU..COA
102
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
OTHER AGENCIES
64. The applicant shall comply with the environmental health recommendations outlined
in the County Health Department's transmittal dated October 6, 1992, a copy of which
is attached.
65. The applicant shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined in the
Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated October 22, 1992, a copy of
which is attached. If the project lies within an adopted flood control drainage area
pursuant to Section 10.25 of City of Temecula Land Division Ordinance 460,
appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the
City prior to issuance of Occupancy Permits.
66. The applicant shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in the
County Fire Department's letter dated October 15, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
67. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated January 23, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
68. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Rancho Water
District transmittal date January 21, 1992, a copy.of which is attached.
69. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated January 21, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
70. The applicant shall comply with the recommendation outlined in the Temecula Valley
Unified School District transmittal dated May 7, 1992, a copy of which is attached.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
71. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology,
Palomar Observatory Outdoor Lighting Policy.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The following items are the City of Temecula, Community. Services Department !TCSD)
Conditions of Approval for this project and shall be completed at no cost to any Government
Agency. The conditions shall be complied with as set fonh below, or as modified by separate
Development Agreement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the Conditions shall be
referred to the Development Service Division of TCSD.
Prior to Recordation of Final MaD!S)
72. Proposed community park sites of less than three (3) acres are to be maintained by an
established Home Owners Association (HOA), until offered and accepted by the TCSD
for maintenance purposes. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16.
1992).
S\ST AFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
103
\~'V
73. CalTllTlldRit'{ parlt sites af (2) seres sr ~reater shall Be effereEl fer EleaieatieA te the City
af TeFAeel:Jla, CeFRFAl:JAit., Ear'Jiees geJJsrtfFleAt (TCED) fer fflBiRteRBRse JJl::Jrpeses
fslls'.viAg eeFflpliaAee t8 e)dstiAg Cit',' stsAelaras BAS eeFRpleti8A af SA applieatieA
Ilreeess. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16, 19921.
74. All proposed slopes. open space, and park land intended for dedication to the TCSD
for maintenance purposes shall be identified on the final map by numbered lots and
indexed to identify said lot numbers as a proposed TCSD maintenance area.
75. Exterior slopes (as defined as: those slopes contiguous to public streets that have a
width of 66' or wider), shall be offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance
purposes following compliance to existing City standards and completion of an
application process. All other slopes shall be maintained by an established Home
Owners Association (HOA).
76. Proposed open space areas shall be maintained by an established Home Owners
Association (HOA). Open space areas of three (3) acres or greater ~ may be
offered for dedication to the TCSD for maintenance purposes and possible further
recreational development, following compliance to existing City standards and
completion of an application process. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16. 19921.
77. Prior to recordation of final map, the applicant or his assignee, shall offer for dedication
parkland as identified in the Development Agreement.
78. All necessary documents to convey to the TCSD any required easements for parkway
and/or slope maintenance as specified on the tentative map or in these Conditions of
Approval shall be submitted by the developer or his assignee prior to the recordation
of final map.
79. Landscape conceptual drawings for project areas (project areas may consist of slopes,
streetscape, medians, turf areas, recreational trails, parks, and etc. that are to be
maintained by the TCSDI identified as TCSD maintenance areas shall be reviewed and
approved by TCSD staff prior to recordation of final map.
80. All areas identified for inclusion into the TCSD shall be reviewed by TCSD staff.
Failure to submit said areas for staff review prior to recordation of final map w+u may
preclude their inclusion into the TCSD. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
81. If the Cit., ~RgiReer eletermiAes that the J3rejeet's street imprs'JeFAeAt BeReI is
iAsl:JffieieAt ta as',ar the J3arlt'..~..ay ISAsseapiRg BRa irri~atieA imprS"eFA8Rts, tRs
sevelsJ3er sAell, prier te reeersstieA af fiRSI map, pest a ISAc:Jsespa perfermaRee 13SAEt
'/ll:liet=l SAslI ~e releaseEl S9ASblrreRtly ',,\'ith tAe release 8f Sl:Jsefi',isieR perfermsRee
beRes, !,;jblsraAteeiAg tt:le '/iability 9f alllaRssespiA!,;j iAstal1ee prier t8 tke aeeef3t8Aae sf
ffiaiRteRaRee reslleRsil3ility 13'( tRe TeED. (Amended by Planning Commission on
November 16, 19921.
S\ST AFFfV'T\24 1 82All.COA
104
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of OccuDancv(s)
82. It shall be the developer's, the developer's successors or assignee responsibility to
disclose the existence of the TCSD, its zones and zone fees to all prospective
purchasers at the same time they are given the parcel's Final Public Report. Said
disclosure shall be made in a form acceptable to the TCSD. Proof of such disclosure,
by means of a signed receipt for same, shall be retained by the developer or his
successors/assignee and made available to TCSD staff for their inspection in the same
manner as set forth in Section 2795.1 of the Regulations Of The Real Estate
Commissioner. Failure to comply shall preclude acceptance of proposed areas into
TCSD.
83. Prior to issuance of anv certificates of occupancy, the developer or his assignee shall
submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's
Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
General
84. All landscape plans submitted for consideration shall be in conformance with
CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDELINES AND
SPECIFICATIONS.
85. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for all
landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance duties are accepted by
the TCSD.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All previous conditions of approval
shall remain in force except as superseded or amended by the following requirements. All
questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate
staff person of the Department of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map or site plan all
existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
GENERAL REOUIREMENTS
86. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) construction shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works
prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
S\ST AFFRPT\24 1 82AU-COA
105
\(P?J
87. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
88. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control District
for approval prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of any permits.
89. All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
90. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part
of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS.;
91. The final grading plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
92. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot, or other devices as otherwise approved by the
Department of Public Works. (Amended by Planning Commission on November 16.
19921.
93. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, developer must comply with the requirements of
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State
Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice
of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt.
94. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall receive written clearance
from the foll,!wing agencies:
. San Diego Regional Water Quality;
. Riverside County Flood Control District;
. Planning Department;
. Department of Public Works;
· General Telephone;
. Southern California Edison Company; and
. Southern California Gas Company.
95. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soils engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
96. An erosion control plan shall be .prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted
to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
S\Sl AFFRPT\24 1 82AlLCOA
106
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
97. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
98. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area
Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been already credited to this property, no
new charge needs to be paid.
99. The developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or easements for any
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
100. A drainage study shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and
approval. The drainage study shall include, but not be limited to, the following criteria:
a. Drainage and flood protection facilities which will protect all structures by
diverting site runoff to streets or approved storm drain facilities as directed by
the Department of Public Works.
b. Identify and mitigate impacts of grading to any onsite and offsite drainage
courses.
c. The location of eXisting and post development 100-year floodplain and
floodway shall be shown on the improvement plan.
101. The subdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section XI of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
102. The subdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
103. A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy
of the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the grading plan.
104. An Encroachment Permit shall be required from Caltrans for any work within their right-
of-way.
105. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control District is required for work within their
right-of-way.
S\STAFFRPT\24182AU-COA
107
\VA
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMITS:
106. All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been submitted /accomplished
to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
107. Improvement plans, including but not limited to, streets, parkway trees, street lights,
driveways, drive aisles, parking lot lighting, drainage facilities and paving shall be
prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer on 24" x 36" mylar sheets and approved by
the Department of Public Works. Final plans (and profiles on streets) shall show the
location of existing utility facilities and easements as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
108. The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the improvement plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
A. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
B. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards
207/207A and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
C. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the. site in
accordance with Ordinance 461 and shall be shown on the improvement plans
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
D. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City standard 400 and 401.
E. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
F. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City standard 113 or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
G. All reverse curves shall include a 100 foot minimum tangent section or as
otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works.
H. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
J. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street from the
commercial site shall be conveyed through undersidewalk drains.
109. The minimum centerline grade for streets shall be 0.50 percent or as otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works.
S\STAFfRPT\241 B2AU.COA
108
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
Ie
I
.
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
110. Improvement plans per City Standards for the private streets or drives within the
commercial site shall be required for review and approval by the Department of Public
Works.
111. All driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula standards and shall be
shown on the street improvement plans in accordance with City Standard 207 and
208. .
112. All driveways shall be located a minimum of two (2) feet from the side property line.
113. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall
be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable
TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence.
114. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
115. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption
to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF FINAL MAP:
116. The developer shall construct or post security and enter into an agreement
guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance
with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public
Works.
A. Street improvements, which may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic
signals and other. traffic control devices as appropriate.
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
D. Erosion control and slope protection.
E. Sewer and domestic water systems.
F. All trails, as required by the City's Master Plans.
G. Undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines.
117. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District;
Eastern Municipal Water District;
Riverside County Flood Control District;
S\STAFFRPT\24182ALLCOA
109
\r$
City of Temecula Fire Bureau;
Planning Department;
Department of Public Works;
Riverside County Health Department;
CATV Franchise;
CalTrans;
Parks and Recreation Department;
General Telephone;
Southern California Edison Company; and
Southern California Gas Company
118. If phasing of the map for construction is proposed, legal all-weather access as
required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided fromthe tract map boundary to a paved
City maintained road.
119. Pedestrian access with sidewalk shall be provided from the cul-de-sac terminus of
Streets "F", "0", "R", "S", "U", "W", "X" and "Z" through the open space and paseo
areas to adjacent streets.
120. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All
dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of
Public Works.
121. Streets "B" up to Street "C", "D", "E" between Streets" J" and "K", "M", "N", "W"
up to Street "Z", "AA" and "BB" shall be improved with 50 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement with a raised 10-foot wide median, or bonds for the street improvements
may be posted, within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with modified City
Standard No.1 04, Section A (70'/50').
122. All remaining interior local streets shall be improved with 40 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 04, Section A (60'/40'1.
123. Street" A", "K", "L" and" AA" shall be improved with 44 feet of asphalt concrete
pavement, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within the dedicated
right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No.1 03, Section A (66'/44').
124. Pauba Road Shall be improved with 32 feet of half street improvement plus one 12-
foot lane, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted, within an 8S-foot
dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 102, (88'/64').
125. Meadows Parkway shall be improved with 38 feet of half street improvement plus one
12-foot lane outside the median, or bonds for the street improvements may be posted,
within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance with City Standard No. 101,
(100'n6').
S\ST AFFf\PT\24182Au..COA
110
I
el
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
.-
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
126. Butterfield Stage Road shall be improved with 43 feet of half street improvement with
a raised median. plus one 12.foot lane outside the median turn lane, or bonds for the
street improvements may be posted. within the dedicated right-of-way in accordance
with City Standard No.1 00, (110'/86').
127. In the event that the required access improvements for this development are not
constructed by Assessment District No. 159 prior to recordation of the final map. the
developer shall construct or bond for all required access improvements per applicable
City Standards. All Assessment District No. 159 improvements necessary for access
to the development shall be constructed prior to occupancy. The Developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula for construction of all
offsite improvements necessary to serve the development as deemed appropriate by
the Department of Public Works.
128. Cul.de.sacs and knuckles shall be constructed per the appropriate City Standards and
as shown on the approved Tentative Map.
129. Left turn lanes shall be provided at all intersections on Street" A", Street "K", Pauba
Road, Butterfield Stage Road and Meadows Parkway as directed by the Department
of Public Works.
. 130. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal
of the final map for recordation, enter into an agreement' to complete the
improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section
66462.5. . Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs
incurred by the City to acquire the off.site property interests required in connection
with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash
deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer, at the
developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to
commencement of the appraisal.
131. Vehicular access shall be restricted on Street" A", Street "K", Street" AA", Butterfield
Stage Road, Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway and so noted on the final map with
the exception of street intersections, across the elementary school site frontage and
two entry points for the commercial site as shown on the approved Tentative Map and
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
132. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the Department of Public Works for Street "A", "K", "L", "AA",
Butterfield Stage Road, Pauba Road and Meadows Parkway and shall be included in the
street improvement plans.
133. Plans for a traffic signal shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved
by the Department of Public Works for the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road at
Street "K" and shall be included in the street improvement plans with the second plan
check submittal.
S\ST AFFRPT\24182AU.COA
111
,cJp
I
134. Traffic signal interconnection shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer to show
1.1/2" rigid conduit with pull rope, and #3 pull boxes on 200-foot centers along the
property fronting Butterfield Stage Road. This design shall be shown on the street
improvement plans and must be approved by the Department of Public Works.
135. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineering for the
design requirements.
136. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as determined by the
Department of Public Works.
137. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805.
138. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
139. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, joint-use driveways, utilities. etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are
located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances
shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public
Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be
contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be
added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and
obstructions. "
140. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall
be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental
concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the City Engineer. A copy
of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval.
141. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environment!!' Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
142. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Department
of Public Works a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal
impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal
mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said
payment to the time of issuance of a building permit.
143. Prior to recording the final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises
of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of
street improvements.
PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT:
144. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
S\Sl AFFRPT\241 82ALLCOA
112
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
_I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
I
145. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading
Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall
be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. All grading shall
also be in conformance with the recommendations of the County Geologist, dated May
15,1989.
146. l:te'/slel3er st:lall pay SA" eal3ital fee fer reaa imJ3revemeFlts BAB fH:lslie faeilities impasse
1.;lJ38A the prsl3ert'( af I3rejeet, iAeh.:u:liAg tRat fer tfsffie aRe 131dl3lie faeility mitigatisA as
reEll:Jiree !:JABer tl:Je EIR/~Jegative DeelaratisR fer tAB prejeet. TAB fee t8 13e I9siEl st:lall
Be iA tl:1e 8M8l:JAt iA at1est at the time af I3symBAt at tl:le fee. If 8A iAteriFFl af fiRSI
13l:Jl3lie faeility mitigatisA fee af efistriet I=las Rat seeR fiAall'{ estaBlishes BY tAB elate SA
'.vt:;)ieR Eleveleper reElI:JBsts its Bl:JileJiAg permits fer tAB J3rejeet af BAY phase tf:aBreef, tAB
ae".'els)3er BRslI B)(eel::lte tAB AgreSFRBAt fer PS'(fABAt af pl:Jslie Faeility fee, 8 espy af
'.vt::lisl=l RSs BeeR J3reviElea 1a efeveleper. CeABblrreAtl'(, witt:. B)(esl:JtiAg tt:lis f.greemsAt,
aevelsJ3er 5Rall pest a seReI ta seet:.lre paymeRt at tt-le P1:ll3lie Faeilit.,. tee. TAB SFFlBl::IFlt
at tAe BaRel 51'=1s11 Be t2.99 par SElt:.Isre taet, Rat te alleses t 1 0,099. Develeper
l::IAeJerstsA8S tASt seiel AgrssFFleRt me", r8E1bJire tRe J3symeAt at tees iA eU8ess af tRese
AS"'.' estimates (assl::ImiAg aeAetit te tAe prejeet iR tAe 8m8l::1At st Sl;JeR tees). 8'1
e)(eS1:JtieA at tRis .^-,greeR=leAt, Ele"/eleper ":...i11 \t\'sive SA'I rigRt t8 pretest tAe pre....isieAs
8f tl=lis CSRsitisA, st tRia .~.gfeeFReAt, tl=:ls farmatisR at SA" !FetfiB impaet fee ttistriet,
'sr tAB preeess, leV"I, sr eelleetisA af eR" tfaffie mitigatisA sr traffie iFRpaet fee fer tRis
prejse!; ereviaeEl that sevelaper is Ast "/J."siviAfj its fight ta pretest tRS rsaseAshleAess
af SAY traffie iffil3aet fee, SAEI tAe aA'le~At tAereef. (Amended by Plsnning Commission
on November 16, 19921.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY:
147. All improvements shall be completed and in place per the approved plans, including but
not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets.
148. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan.
149. All traffic signals shall be installed and operational per the special provisions and the
approved traffic signal plan.
150. All traffic signal interconnection shall be installed per the approved plan.
151. The subdivider shall provide 'stop' controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets.as directed by the Department of Public Works.
152. All landscaping shall be installed in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the
Department of Public Works. .
153. A 32' wide paved secondary access road for phased development shall be constructed
within a recorded private road easement as approved by the Department of Public
Works per City of Temecula Standard 106 (60'/32').
S\ST AFfRPT\24182AU.COA
113
\Cp"-
154. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied only as directed by the Department of
Public Works for pavement joins and transition coatings. Asphalt emulsion shall
conform to Section Nos. 37, 39, and 94 of the State Standard Specifications.
155. In the event that the required improvements for this development are not completed
by Assessment District 159 prior to certification for occupancy, the Developer shall
construct all required improvements. The Developer shall also provide an updated
traffic analysis as directed by the Department of Public Works to determine the
construction timing and the Developer's percent of contribution toward any facilities
not completed per the schedules of improvement, tables XV and XVI, for the Rancho
Villages Assessment. The Developer shall also enter into a reimbursement agreement
with the City of Temecula for the construction of any necessary improvements not
completed by Assessment District 159 as determined by the approved traffic analysis.
S~lA~4'B2AULCOA
114
I
"I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
\~
K'
""
Cll
3
",.
~-'
IJ
11
11
I,
f
,
if
"
I
I
,
f
f
,
~
~
~
~
Screencheck SPA Sumitted: 12-21-89 / 4-6-90
Draft SPA Submitted: 5-4-90 / 2-4-91
Proposed Final SPA Approved:
Final SPA Adopted:
THE MEADOWS AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219
AMENDMENT NO. 1
Developed by:
Bedford Properties/Mesa Homes
28765 Single Oak Drive, Suite 100
Temecula, CA 92390
(714) 676-7290
Contact Person:
Csaba Ko
Prepared by:
TURRINI AND BRINK
Planning Consultants
3242 Halladay, Suite 100
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Contact Persons:
Barry Burnell
Raymond L. Hebert
(714) 662-2774
In Association With:
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates, Civil Engineers
Ballew and Associates, Inc., Planning/Architecture
Hogan-Roy Partners, Planning, Landscape Architecture
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc., Geotechnical
Douglas Wood and Associates, Environmental Analysis
Wilbur Smith Associates, Traffic Analysis
Lead Agency: city of Temecula
Contact Planner: Oliver Mujica
(714) 694-6400
n
\<.,0...
NO.
I.
II.
III.
I. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SUMMARY
A. PROJECT SUMMARY
PAGE
i
A-l
1
1
SPECIFIC PLAN
A. DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND STANDARDS
8
8
1. specific Land Use Plan
a. project Description
b. Development Standards
2. Circulation Plan
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
3. Drainage Plan
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
4. Water and Sewer Plans
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
5. Pub11~ Facility sites Phasing Plan
a. Phasing Description
b. Phasing Schedule
6. Grading Plan
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
7. open Space and Recreation Plan
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
8. Landscaping Plan
a. Plan Description
b. Development Standards
10
10
13
20
20
28
30
30
30
33
33
33
38
38
38
43
43
43
46
46
55
57
57
62
B. PLANNING AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 64
1. Planning Area 1 70
a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development Standards
c. Planning Standards
2. Planning Area 2 77
a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development standards
c. Planning Standards
i
,r
'l
\,\0
III
III 29. Planning Area 29 163
a. Descriptive Summary
.- b. Land Use and Development Standards
c. Planning Standards
30. Planning Area 30 166
I a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development Standards
.. c. Planning Standards
31. Planning Area 31 169
a. Descriptive Summary
, b. Land Use and Development Standards
.,.
c. Planning Standards
32. Planning Area 32 172
a. Descriptive Summary
.,. b. Land Use and Development Standards
c. Planning Standards
33. Planning Area 33 175
~ a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development Standards
c. Planning Standards
34. Planning Area 34 178
-- a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development Standards
.- c. Planning Standards
35. Planning Area 35 181
a. Descriptive Summary
b. Land Use and Development Standards
. c. Planning Standards
C. PROJECT PHASING 184
a. Phasing Plan
. b. Phasing Standards
D. MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 188
. IV. DESIGN GUIDELINES 190
. A. PURPOSE AND INTENT 190
B. ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES 191
1. Purpose 191
II 2. Basic Theme 193
3. Architectural Guidelines 195
a. General Criteria 195
II b. Medium High and Very High
Density Housing 207
c. Neighborhood Commercial 211
4. Suggested Architectural Styles - 218
II Description and Application
II
II iv \~\
.
I'
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
~
~
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C. LANDSCAPE GUIDELINES AND COMMUNITY
ELEMENTS 223
1. Landscape Design Guidelines 223
a. Introduction 223
b. Major Community Streetscenes 228
c. Project Streetscape 235
d. Major Community and Project
Entry Accent Trees 247
e. Plant Material Palette 248
f. Planting Time 252
g. General Landscape Requirements 252
h. Climate Constraints 253
1. Horticultural Soils Test
Requirements 254
j. Irrigation 254
k. Landscape Maintenance 255
2. Community Elements 256
a. Entry Monumentation 256
b. Walls and Fences 264
3. Street scenes and Conceptual Landscape
Plans 275
a. Residential Neighborhood
Streetscene 275
b. Commercial Use Landscape
Requirements 276
c. Very High Density Residential
Landscape Requirement 279
d. Medium Density Residential
Landscape Requirement 282
e. Parks and Recreation Amenities 282
f. Greenbelt/Paseo 291
4. Maintenance Responsibility 292
5. Outdoor Lighting 294
V. GJrnERAL l?LAN/ENVIROHENTAL ANALYSIS
Note: EIR No. 235 was certified and adopted by the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1988. The
following Amendment to Specific Plan No. 219 will be used in
conjunction with the certified EIR. A copy of EIR No. 235
is on file with the Riverside County Planning Department.
v
,~1/
II
i_
,
II
"
,
,
,
i'
,
il
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
NO.
1
2
2-1
3
4
5A
5B
5C
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13A
13B
13C
14A
14B
14C
15A-JJ
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
23A
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
LIST OF FIGURES
TITLE
Regional Map
Vicinity Map
Adajcent/Proposed Land Uses
Specific Land Use Plan
Circulation Plan
Roadway Cross Sections
Roadway Cross Sections
Roadway Cross Sections
Bicycle Plan
Drainage Plan
Water Plan
Sewer Plan
Public Facility Sites Phasing Plan
Grading Concept
Open Space and Recreation Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Slope Transition Area
Landscaped Transition Area
Typical Traditional SFD Configuration
Typical Courtyard Configuration
Typical Cluster Configuration
Planning Areas (1-35)
Conceptual Phasing Plan
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Entry statement Monumentation and
Theme Walls
Typcial Community Street Scene Transition
Slope Plan
Section AA - Community Street Scene
Section BB - Transition Slope Zone
Section CC - Community Street Scene Flat
Condition
Section A-l Community Street Scene
Section A-2 Meadows Parkway and DePortola
Road Streetscene
Section B - Pauba Road Street Scene
Section C - Highway 79 Street Scene
Section D - Street "A" and street "F"
Project Entries
Section E - Project Loop Street Scene
Section F - Greenbelt Corridor at
Street
Section G - Greenbelt paseo Drainage
Corridor
Section H - Primary paseo Corridor
Section I - Neighborhood Entry
Community Entry Statements (Plan View)
Major Community Entry Statement (Elevation)
vi
PAGE
2
3
4
18
22
23
24
25
27
32
35
37
42
44
48
59
60
61
65
66
67
72-183
185
225
227
230
231
232
233
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
257
258
\,\'?
34 Community Intersection Entry statement 261
(Plan)
35 Project Entry Statement (Plans) 262
36 Minor Project Entry statement (Elevation) 263
37 Neiqhborhood Entry statement (Plan) 265
38 Project Intersection Entry statement (Plan) 266
39 Paseo Entry Statement (Plan) 267
40 Conceptual Community Theme Wall Details 269
41 Conceptual Residential Theme Walls 270
42 Commercial Conceptual Landscape Plan 278
43 Very Hiqh Density Residential Conceptual
Landscape Plan 280
44 Medium Hiqh Density Residential Conceptual 281
Landscape Plan
45 Medium Density Residential Conceptual 283
Landscape Plan
46 (OMITTED PER AMENDMENT NO.1) 285
47 (OMITTED PER AMENDEMNT NO.1) 287
48 Recreation Area Conceptual Landscape Plan 289
49 Neiqhborhood Park Conceptual Landscape Plan 290
50 Pedestrian Crossinq Conceputal Landscape 293
Plan
vii
~
NO.
I
tI
III
IV
I,
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE
PAGE
19
38
49
186
Detailed Land Use Summary
Public Facilities Phasing
Recreation/Open Space Program
Development Phasing
viii
\.A,~
,
'~ j
t
I
,
,
-
-
-
,
I
II
-
II
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO MEADOWS SPECIFIC PLAN
The Meadows Specific Plan Amendment proposes several changes to the original Meadows Specific
Plan that was adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1988. The
changes include: the relocation of the commercial areas from Highway 79 and Meadows Parkway
to the northeast corner of Margarita Road and Highway 79; the realignment of "H" Street because
of its change in designation from a 66-foot R.O.W. collector to a lOO-foot R.O.W. major; the
upgrading of "0" Street to a lOO-foot R.O.W. major; the designation of very high density residential
for the area previously designated as commercial at the nonheast corner of Meadows Parkway and
Highway 79; and the replacement of the high density with very high density land uses. Please note
that "0" and "H" Streets will use the 88' -R.O.W. design criteria for radius and intersection spacing,
etc. The acreage and dwelling unit comparisons are illustrated below.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE
--
Land Use Acres
Medium 574.0
Medium-High 402.0
High 26.0
Very High 34.0
Commercial 30.0
Neighborhood 15.0
Commercial
Day Care 2.0
Middle School 20.0
Elementary School 41.0
Parks 15.4
Paseos 115.6
Roads 114.0
PROJECT TOTAL 1,389.0
;1;M~~d~W~~;P:N~:gl~;~m;~~ttt.~n.tf.i6:1i
Dwelling Dwelling
Units Land Use Acres Units
2,499 Medium 536.0 2,338
2,210 Medium High 437.5 2,356
324 High Eliminated
578 Very High 57.8 910
Commercial 36.4
Neighborhood 15.0
Commercial
Day Care 2.0
Middle School 20.0
Elementary School 41.0
Parks 15.4
Paseos 113.9
Roads 114.0
5,611 PROJECT TOTAL 1,389.0 5,604
A-I Il '\~ 10
I
e 'Ii
Fij 'I~~
"~=.<I
~ ~
:l' \I~
~
~ .
~ I
"1 ~\
.,. '\
/:fl-I
">!:"'~."&/ ~~...
'r ,~'
~~~~ ~ o. ,
~....~:.~ ....
'., ..tr.:"~-"l;~.'
e"
. . I }
'" .v . ",. I
.J e ~ ~ '"' ~
.) Q
~.=.=. ~\ ('11-,'111
~.~~ v \\
C't'~J I <<'~
,~ ~""'!- ~,.
~'Ci~
~
.,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,...
m
Cl
m
Z
C
[[][D[!]
~
1O!
,
."
~
".
'.';
,
L\
I .
: -t-J.
,~~~
r-
J l I:
T~;~
:_~
j
I"
"
,"',i-'
'42'
"
~
~.I
7'X12"
R.C.B.
--
1
,
.
..,
'.
'.
~~
;N~
>m
z
n 1-:::>"
::r: ;::.;;,.,
o trj
n>
~tJ
o ()
~<
>CJ)
~
o
c
~
m
~
o
m
m
~
" ~
m m
< m
in ;z
m ~
o E
.. .
~ .
'" ~
. 0
;a (... ~
)>. .
;o;Z ~
~ 0; ~
~ ~ 52
m Q :!j
~ ~ m
?~
-~
,
w
"
,
Nm
.m
'0
.~
.0
~~
_0
,
_ 0
;~
om
:.5
~
o.
'm
< z
. ~
~o
< 0
=.
. ,
N'
oZ
0<
~
,
n
,
o
~
;;
,
..
o
.
~
~
~
o
.. ....
li~::~..",
~~'"'":1tll. ; tj
.!!~~.~..~~ .~
" fti,.___ ..
~: ~lt:~ !iJ'~ ~,
';''''\'''<1'''' ."..;
'~~t~~"::'~ ,-",:,trp-. ~
~';'~';J.I.: "..,.,f>,/~~"'Y-l"h'. )
.~/""."" 'f~f;; '.::: I'
.;'.!.I~';' , .
-".
~g~ ~g~ z
mzg 2zg :;;
",!!II: m!!ll: . ~
. ~::Ua ~2Jo ';~l 0
. .. . ..5" .. 5<":,,,,,. c
_' : .~.. ,," Z-t~ o~~ '2;.ti;~-t
;0;-" -": ,~,' -tmz - !:;!mz ",~,r-
;:,t .... .....1.:".. D ."gD "oiiii-~
."~. '. : ~ ;~f\~'"1_:'':O 211II1: ~ .C~'\m.
",I ,;',">:"11'" !j>cz" >cz.'\I{.-;lC!
.~:f*"'.t- ; .~,~ ;..~:i.i); t:::. :II .m !;"1I!:l" III :.1*~-'
'.'".'.. ~. '!t.., _. .. . . .. .... ,.
-.:;~]- :'7?::-~; r 0 -o~. '';O~'"
.'l"""'~ ..-.....",~ - :'';1- -t .''''':-:--'''' .~~o
'. ~-~-. .,.. .. ....,...,...... ~
~....'i~ ,._..~- ~,< .>',' -. .,.--1" ""':~. _}l@r~
~. ""'",,,,, Ii'..,. ..;1)"'1:
~~r "'~:i{f~S,:.-;.-.~:~ :.:~~~
,
,
~.
-.-
~....
iU'15
1mB.
!i~
I!I z
,II "
P
;
\,\,\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'
C. PROJECT PHASING
a. Phasinq Plan
It is expected that the proposed project will be phased
over a lO-year period, in response to market demands,
according to a logical and orderly extension of roadways,
public utilities and infrastructure. (See Figure 16,
Conceptual Phasing Plan; Table VI, Phasing Table.)
b. Phasinq Standards
1) The maximum dwelling unit total for any sin-
gle family planning area as modified by paragraph 2
below may not be exceeded. A Specific Plan Amend-
ment shall not be required as long as the number of
dwelling units in each single family planning area
as listed does not exceed the total allowable under
paragraph 2 below.
2) Prior to issuance of building permits, improvement
plans for the respective landscaped areas, or plans
to mitigate an environmental impact for that stage
of development, shall be submitted to the County
Planning Department for approval. The improvement
plans shall include, but not be limited to the follow-
ing:
Final grading plan.
Irrigation plans certified by a landscaped archi-
tect.
A landscaping plan with seed mixes for mulching
and staking methods; locations, type, size and
quantity of plantings.
Fence treatment plans.
Special treatment/buffer area treatment plans.
3)
Each
mon
Area
planning area shall include development of com-
open space areas as specified in the Planning
standards and infrastructure.
4) Construction of the development permitted hereby,
including recordation of final Subdivision maps, may
be done progressively in stages, provided adequate
vehicular access is planned or bonded for for all
dwelling units in each stage of development and fur-
ther provided that such phase of development conforms
substantially with the intent and purpose of the
Specific Plan phasing program.
"A.; 'b
184
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
.:~
t
,~
;1
i
j,
~\
'ti
,
'~;c'-
:;..-:-- "
~".'
"',.~..~. '\'ii.r'~.:"'... ,
',~..". .~l~~ '
~\,~ ,
- ~j"~ '
U;.,
"".I: ""'~
~< """'~"
.
~ !.
,
.
I
~,<)
~i> ~
~O...., ::c
!!!~
~ Cl I-T1
om"" tTI
o~ ~
. r ,r
-Il Z
o.
:~ () ~
~O ......
eO.......
~.
:~ 0 tTI
OZ
~~ () >
~ >: 0
Or-<
~ .......
! ~~o
: z
;! 5= (fJ
\>- =
'to'
,~
, ,
"
'i.l
0-
"
'.
.
.
,
'F~:~~~:~~'
...',<
"
,-r-
::,<>
","
.
-
-
"{,
.,~
<
.1~.
\i
\\
"
"
'''1
III
"
Hi
fi'
'j '\
:<:11\\1
i \1
'.. '
.~:t:.!.
".,...
-
-
-
.
.
~
;;:.,
"
j=
:'
"
.l',
,.
'~
,.
'~'~'<:-.'
\
-
'.
.
~{
'~"
"'1
-
<
~.
"
.
ii-
,
!
I
-
-
-
.
~i
,..~
-
II
r
,
'."-'
\t~'"
,,,I
~~~':'
"
!!
,.
~
-
-
'0 0
roO
~Z
Zo
m
"tI
-l
C
>
,...
"tI
:t
>
en
-
~
,...
m
Cl
m
z
c
~8BB
." ." ." ."
J: J: J: J:
ill ill ill ill
III III III III
<: '" - -
B
."
J:
ill
III
<
!l;-,-~,~.i;~..A:'~~":';::'~'~~~:'~~
z
o
....
m
::! ". oj- d,-~-'m (') ~
~ Z ;c M 0 ::t
m 0 ~,-iIZ ;! Z m
0(1) ;OIZO'~~
." m )00 ." Z .... :'J >-
o S .~.:;! " l!l c !!!
mo::tm>:!C:>Z
<mm ::D;..rGl
p:! (I) ::D ~ ~ ::D m en
o > m..., en ~ > m
-0 ::D C,m m en 0
3l: m C'O 3: .... m C
m"oii....>oc~
Z :II m i~ -< m 0 (')
;-l00 m!:zm
< Z (1).m >, (I)
6,,:m1cz(')X
m :II 8 '" P !ii 0
0". '" < 0':11 :IE
>~~IP",mz
..
"
'-
;Z
~
..
...
,
o
..
..
~
,
....
ro
'"
,
~.
-....-
r...
lll'~
n;l~~
liF. iN
lJ-..e
::~;:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 91-36
A RESOLUTION OF TIm CITY OF TIm CITY COUNca OF TIm CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING ZONE NO. 5621 AND SPECIFIC PLAN NO.
219, AMENDMENT NO.1 AMENDING TIm BOUNDARIES AND LAND
USE DESIGNATIONS OF PLANNING AREA I, 2, 5 AND 6 OF SPECIFIC
PLAN NO. 219 FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LOCATED ON TIm
NORTImAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND ffiGHWAY 79;
AND BOUND BY DE PORTOLA ROAD TO TIm NORTH AND KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-100-007
WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Change of Zone No. 5621 and Specific Plan No.
219, Amendment No.1 in accordance with Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and
Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Change of Zone and Specific Plan Amendment applications were
processed in the time and manner prescribed by Slate and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Change of Zone and Specific Plan
Amendment on March 18, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify
either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended
approval of said Change of Zone and Specific Plan Amendment;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Change of
Zone and Specific Plan Amendment on April 9, 1991, at which time interested persons had
opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Change of Zone and Specific Plan
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Change of Zone and Specific Plan Amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findinlls. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 3D-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
Rcao. 9 J -36
-1-
\(i:P
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
plan.
2. The planning agency fmdings, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being
considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable
time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use
or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of slate law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter .SW AP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the are now within the
boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines
while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
C. The City Council in approving the proposed Change of Zone and Specific Plan
Amendment, makes the following findings, to wit:
a.
There is a reasonable probability that Change of Zone No. 5621 and
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 1 will be consistent with
the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a
reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact
that the subject request is consistent with the SWAP Designation of
SP 219.
b.
There is not a likely probability of subslantial detriment to or
interference with the future General Plan, if Change of Zone No.
5621 and Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1 are ultimately
inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that an approval of such
an amendment may be consistent with the goals and/or policies of
the City's Future General Plan.
RC80. 91-36
-2-
\~\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c. The project is compatible with sunounding land uses. The harmony
creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining
properties, due to the fact that the adjoining developments were
developed as an overall concept for Specific Plan No. 219 and the
proposed project is consistent with Specific Plan No. 219.
d. The proposed will not have an adverse effect on surrounding
property, because it does not represent a significant change to the
present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the
proposed density is consistent with the overall concept of Specific
Plan No. 219.
D. The Change of Zone and Specific Plan Amendment are compatible with the
health, safety and welfare and of the community.
SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. An Initial Study prepared for this project
indicates that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in EIR
235 and in the Conditions of Approval have been added to the project, and a Negative
Declaration, therefore, is hereby granted.
SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves
Change of Zone No. 5621 and Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 1 amending the
boundaries and land use designations of Planning Area 1, 2, 5, and 6 of Specific Plan No. 219
for the subject property located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and Highway 79; and
bound by De Portola Road to the north and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 910-100-007, subject
to the following conditions:
A. Exhibit A (Specific Plan Text);
B. Exhibit B (Conditions of Approval); and
C. Exhibit C (Specific Plan Development Standards.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Resos 91-36
-3-
\~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPfED this 9th day of April, 1991.
4J1iL-
Ronald I. Parks, Mayor
ATIEST:
~_d.~
Iun .. reek, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 9th day of April, 1991 by the
following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Birds all, Moore, Munoz, Parks
NOES: 0
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
None
ABSTAIN: 1
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Lindemans
~ Rf. 4JJ
. Greek, City Clerk
Resoa 91-36
4-
W?'J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 219, AMENDMENT NO. 1
Planninq Department
1. Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.1 shall consist of thefollowing:
a. Exhibit "A": Specific Plan Text
b. Exhibit liB": Specific Plan Conditions of Approval
c. Exhibit "C": Specific Plan Development Standards
2. If any of the following conditions of approval differ from the specific plan text
or exhibits, the conditions enumerated herein shall take precedence.
3. The development of the property shall be in accordance with the mandatory
requirements of all City of Temecula ordinances including Ordinance Nos. 348
and 460 and state laws; and shall conform substantially with adopted Specific
Plan No. 219, Amendment No. 1 as filed in the office of the Planning
Department. unless otherwise amended.
4. No portion of the specific plan which purports or proposes to change, waive
or modify any ordinance or other legal requirement for the development shall
be considered to be part of the adopted specific plan.
5. The project shall comply with the conditions set forth in the following agency
letters and/or the requirements set forth by these agencies at the development
stage:
a.
b.
c.
Road Department
Flood Control
Fire Department
June 2, 1988
May 26. 1988
January 8, 1988 and
February 25, 1991
May 2S. 1988
April 5, 1988
May 23, 1988
May 24, 1988
January 26, 1988
July 20, 1990
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Parks
County Administrative Offices
Water Agency
Sewer Agency
Temecula School District
Department of Health
6. Impacts to the Temecula Union School District shall be mitigated at the
development application stage in accordance with the District policies in effect
at the time of tract submittal.
ST AFFRPT\SP219
13
,~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7. Common areas identified in the specific plan shall be owned and maintained as
follows:
a. A permanent master maintenance organization shall be established for
the specific plan area. to assume ownership and maintenance
responsibility for all common recreation. open space. circulation
systems and landscaped areas. The organization may be public or
private. Merger with an area-wide or regional organization shall satisfy
this condition provided that such organization is legally and financially
capable of assuming the responsibilities for ownership and maintenance.
If the organization is a private association then neighborhood
associations shall be established for each residential development,
where required. and such associations may assume ownership and
maintenance responsibility for neighborhood common areas.
b. Unless otherwise provided for in these conditions of approval. common
areas shall be conveyed to the maintenance organization as implementing
development is approved or any subdivision is recorded.
c. The maintenance organization shall be established prior to or
concurrent with the recordation of the first land division. or issuance
of any building permits for any approved development permit (use
permit. plot plan. etc.)
8. Development applications which incorporate common areas shall be accompanied
by design plans for the common area. Such plans shall specify the location
and extent of landscaping. irrigation systems. structures. and circulation
(vehicular. pedestrian and/or equestrian).
9. The following special studies/reports shall accompany implementing
development applications in the planning areas listed below:
Study/Report Planninq Areas
Archeological Report As per the County Historian's requirements
Mitigation for Stephens
Kangaroo Rat I See 1- and 25
Condition No. 16)
10. A land division filed for the purposes of phasing or financing shall not be
considered an implementing development application; provided that if the
maintenance organization is a property owners association. the legal
documentation necessary to establish the association shall be recorded
concurrently with the recordation of the final map.
11 . Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of any use
contemplated by this approval. the applicant shall first obtain clearance from
the Planning Department that all pertinent conditions of approval have been
satisfied with the specific plan for the phase of development in questions.
ST AFFRPT\SP219
14
\~-6
'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
12. An environmental assessment shall be conducted for each tract. change of
zone. plot plan. specific plan amendment, or any other discretionary permit
required to implement the specific plan. At a minimum, the environmental
assessment shall utilize the evaluation of impacts addressed in the EIR
prepared for Specific Plan No. 219.
13. Prior to the recordation of a final map, the land divider shall submit to the
Planning Department an agreement with the appropriate parks and recreation
district which demonstrates to the satisfaction of the City that the land
divider has provided for the payment of fees and/or offer of dedication of
lands in accordance with Section .10.35 I Parks and Recreation Fees and
Dedications) of Land Division Ordinance No. 460.
14. Prior to the recordation of any final subdivision map or issuance of building
permits in the case of use permits and plot plans. the applicant shall submit
to the Planning Department the following documents which shall demonstrate
to the satisfaction of the City that individual appropriate owners associations
will be established and will operate in accordance with the intent and purpose
of the specific plan.
a. The document to convey title.
b. Covenants. Conditions. and Restrictions to be recorded.
c. Management and maintenance agreements to be entered into with the
unit/lot owner of the project.
The master property owners association. commercial property owners
association. and the business park owners association shall be charged with
the unqualified right to assess their own individual owners who own individual
units for reasonable maintenance and management costs which shall be
established and continually maintained. The individual owners association
shall have the right to lien the property of any owner who defaults in payment
of their assessment fees. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any
encumbrance other than a deed of trust. provided such deed of trust is made
in good faith and for good value. and is of record prior to the lien of the
individual owners association.
15. The applicant or its successor shall defend. indemnify. and hold harmless the
City of Temecula. its agents. officer. and employees from any claim, action.
or proceeding against the City of T emecula or its agents. officer. or
employees to attach. set aside, void. or annul an approval of the City of
Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning
Specific Plan No. 219. Amendment No.1. which action is brought within the
time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The
City of Temecula will promptly notify the applicant or its successor of any
such claim. action. or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will
cooperate fully in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the
applicant or its successor of any such claim. action. or proceeding or fails to
cooperate fully in the defense. the applicant or its successor shall not.
ST AFFRPT\SP219
15
\~(l,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
thereafter. be responsible to defend. indemnify. or hold harmless the City of
Temecula.
16. Trapping studies have indicated the presence of existing habitat (occupied by
Stephens Kangaroo Rat) for Planning Areas 10 and 25. Prior to issuance of
grading permits for this planning area, the applicant shall provide mitigation
for removal of the SK R habitat as follows:
a. Memorandum of Understanding between the developer and the California
Department of Fish and Game. or
b. Compliance with an adopted County Program for the mitigation of
removal of Stephens Kangaroo Ran habitat.
17. Within forty-eight (48) hours of the approval of the project. the
applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashiers check
or money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand.
Two Hundred. Seventy-Five Dollars ($1.275.001. which includes the One
Thousand. Two Hundred. Fifty Dollars ($1.250.00) fee in compliance with AB
3158. required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(2) plus the Twenty-
Five Dollar 1$25.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the
Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152
and 14 Cal. Code of Regulations 15075. If within such forty-eight (48) hour
period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check required above. the approval for the project granted herein shall
be void by reason of failure of condition. Fish and Game Code Section
711.4Ic).
18. Prior to the issuance of grading permits and/ or building permit. the developer
or his successor's interest shall submit a mitigation monitoring program to the
Planning Department for approval. which shall describe how compliance with
required mitigation measures will be met and the appropriate monitoring timing
of the mitigation.
ST AFFRPT\SP219
16
\ f:b1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
V'
Kay 26, 1988
Riverside County
Plallning Department
County Admln13tratl~e Center
Riverside, California
Attention: Specific Plan Section
non Goldman
Speoific Phn No. M:5:o ~ ~.f1
VaU HeadowiS ;117 ~
Ladies nnd GentleM~n: Re:
In our April 6, 193a letter we expressed concern over deficien-
cies in the Speeif1c Plan document. These problems have been
largely corrPoctect by the applicant through the revision of a par.
tion of the t-.xt that deals with drainage 8lon~ Pauba Road end
through the revision of Figure 57.
The Changes on FiGure 57 include the extension of two proposed
storm drains southerly to Temecula Cree~, the addition of a large
storm drain along fauba Road and a newly proposed facility along
Butterfield Stage no ad at the southeast oorner of the proJeot.
This last dr9inag~ structure has been proposed 8S a result of our
comments on the earlier dr~ft. It 1s needed to intercept a large
amount of offsite storm runoff that approaches the project from
the east. Its ropresentation on Figure 57 ahould be conSidered
concQptual with regard to location and design and the design flow
rates and sizos should be re'SlIrded as utimates.
This facility should be co"struc~ed as a permanent facility
either oosite or ofrsite before de~elopment of the downstream
Brea it Is mQant to protect.
As long 2S the text and figure changes Bnd these comments are
made n part of the final document we do not object to the approv-
al of this project.
Very truly yours,
KENNETH L. EDWARDS
Chief Engineer
JOHN H. KASHUBA.
Senior Ci~ll Engineer
co: Robert Bein, Wl111a~ Frost
'" Assoclates
JUK:bjp
\rot
2.d
Ioll9S : n 66, 22 !:Xl
IZ aBed -- weZl:ll 6661 'zz "aqo,oo ^ep!"~l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~~l UO.
... v ..r"" t :.l.' -..t.... ,u I 1.J4 4' ~, &,I...IIJ..1...\JU~.
( (
.CITY OF TEMECUlA
,.L';I;,...............-.I.Vllr v' v
(
=
~I .0:::;
r-:ll:- -= -
~-':::- tII - . ~{.'.
I.
.
.
~ =;
_oc
mt1T .. =.-.
UAC:
.
-
-
..
~
"
CASE NO.: Change of Zone No. 18. Specific Pllln No. 219, Amended No. Z .
EXHIBIT: F SPECIFIC PLAN REVISION MAP
P.C. DATE: January 27. 199Z
\%0...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-:UH LH-
...J
.L .... u-s I -:""%.1.1 It!, \,.;.1.1.1 Vi iUllL\..Ur..........
~ITV OF TEMECUlA
,!~'UUUO~O;~ 01 b
'"'"
..
POTCNTlAL ACCESS POlN1"
itTJ
POTENTIAl.. ACCESs POINT' ...
ROADWAY LANDSCAPE TREATMENT
_ ..... 2'* ,. ..
, ",
. .
MINOR PROJECT ENTRY STATEMelT
till! - DJ
RONJWAV LANDSCAPE TREAlMENT
... fglla! 2a
.tt
.
I
.
36
NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL
2.5 AC.
CASE NO.: Change of Zone No. 18. Specific Plan No. 219. Amended No.2
EXHIBIT: C . SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
P.C. DATE: January 27,1992
\ ().[)
~'
~ Iii
lito lilot
A':~~- .. Iii-
a W .- I '--"::::;i[
II ~t' ;i?..t" l'oS:..w
, S...; \ b~t ..~.
!~~;:~"ilt'~\ 11! III 0 J. \f":!'
. :.~ r:-... 1'1 .~. .N' Ill. \\ '."
.. ~,.". I" .... . ~ '
" _ . .. .. .L-
" I t \'... '~t.._~ .r'" ~ 1'--.
.~t"" ,I,..\'r :,.....'::.. . .~., I ,,\. '1
.. . ,. .t.~ ... .. . ..J.
--o\~.Jii. (. Ii '" .....
~"'J~"'!I$'~~.;~l .1" Ill'~'~ l../r
r...." .. A. ,,~... ;;, :11-7
\\ ..7'".....--' lf ~~::=:"\.
" ..~_... I. !l!
Ilf. ~\ ,I; .~ ~ . III'
r I J); t'
. ~t'!lbL. 111- ..l~ Jil, 'Iif
.. .... ..,r- . _J:.~' I ;or ...J P.""'"......- .
1,' \~ J:Ji' II' ,.. \T~. . t' I' ",
.. .r g ... -=:::_~i:r' ·
.'}.. ~\ ,r ... --n:}-"". 'I ,
..", I~:~ ... .~..;;.: I
...... "'t rr~"
" .I:it . -~ I - '.".
,,1. t" ". JIlt.. ........ii . lJ. .11-.. ~ ...-....!...-"
~ .t~ .,." ~'!'- > 'I ~ ~-_.
.. lit.' ". ..'
U .. . ;,.... . t' I"
-...... i! " ~J"'" I A:..:r~ ~ 'I' I
~.'i' <"...,,~.,~:!. otfA'-:. ---... .~.~.......,.~~..! II
hi ~ ".r. '+..JJf:"11 \. ..,. ,~. '..". ,
r" , .' ,:,!'':w~( r' ~ I.S"~ t
'1r' 1~1' "" "" .::l ~
,\
t.
"
.\
~~...~ ,..-
.,'
I
I
I
.: \
" .
~.....;
u
I.',
"......
*
"U
\"0\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.~
~,
~I
)>,
r'
J
" (
(J)
o
~
)>
o
JTI
r
o
r
=
-
::tJI
...
;;.,
~...
'0
:..
...
110
3..
;....
...
3'-
..0
ll'"
..I:
;..
='"
. ""
ftn
50
:iC
-..
F>
:'"
."
e
;
I
I
.;
.....
,
.,-
I
I
I
I
I
,nC'
('1
~rn
5:'111
mm
zO
c-
:s::!I
mO
!i~
::~
c:
rn
m
'111
r-
)>
Z
UI!IP
i
~
n
Ii
II
G:
.
! . .
- -..
.. i::
i ;;11
. ..
a e!!
tE!:t
=_ ~ 63
.. J:~
...:1"
1IIIIiUil
~lil!Ulj !
~ ~ I
~
ill
lo
>>
.
~,.,-('\
I
-';i!~.~I!rD;;
B b ia
t
I
II
I n11n~.~
"
't,
)
~",""f'Y'\-mn
r
,....
-~-
r.-
~nt
~I!
Jr! n
n
f
n I~ Alo~n('('\("'~T
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
Screencheck S.P. Amendment No.4 Submiued: March 14. 1994
Draft S.P. Amendment No. 4 Submitted: Mav 6.1994
Final S.P. Amendment No.4 Approved by Planning Commission: June 6.1994
Fmal S.P. Amendment No.4 Approved by City Council: AUQust 9. 1994
PALOMA DEL SOL
Formerly The Meadows at Rancho California
+
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.4
EIR No. 235
+
Developed by:
KRDC, INC.
27555 Ynez Road, Suite 202
Ternecula, California 92591
(909) 676-7290
Contact: Csaba Ko
Prepared by:
T&B PLANNING CONSULTANTS, INC.
3242 Halladay, Suite 100
Santa Ana, California 92705
(714) 662-2774
Contact: Barry Burnell
In Association with:
Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates - Civil Engineers
Ballew & Associates, Inc. - Planning! Architecture
HRP LanDesign - Planning. Landscape Architecture
Land Concern, Landscape Architecture
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. - Geotechnical
Douglas Wood & Associates - Environmental Analysis
Wilbur Smith Associates - Traffic Analysis
Lead Agency: City of Ternecula
Contact Planner: Debbie Ubnoske, (909) 694-6400
Saied Naaseh
August 9.1994
\Ox"'"
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
II SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO PALOMA DEL SOL (MEADOWS) SPECIFIC PLAN
The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan Amendment No.4 is being filed pursuant to City
Council approval of the "Agreement Regarding Paloma del Sol" on January 11, 1994.
Amendment No.4 adds 6.5 acres of very high density residential to Planning Area 6,
adds 1.5 acres of park to Planning Area 37, reduces community/neighborhood commercial
area in Planning Area 1 by 4.9 acres and reduces major roads by 3.1 acres. The revised
acreages are based on recent detailed engineering to establish the surrounding roadway
alignments in conjunction with design and construction of the neighborhood park in
Planning Area 37. The acreage and dwelling unit comparisons are illustrated below.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE
Meadows S.P. No. 219 Meadows S.P. No. 219
Amendment No.3 Amendment No.4
Land Use Acres Dwelling Land Use Acres Dwelling
Units Units .
Medium 536.0 2,338 Medium 536.0 2,338
Medium High 437.5 2,356 Medium-High 437.5 2.356
Very High 49.8 812 Very High 56.3 910
Commercial 36.4 Commercial 31.5
Neighborhood 17.5 Neighborhood 17.5
Commercial Commercial
Day Care 2.0 Day Care 2.0
Middle School 20.0 Middle School 20.0
Elementary School 41.0 Elementary School 41.0
Parks or 26.0 Parks or 27.5
Recreation Center Recreation Center
Paseos 111.3 Paseos 111.3
Major Roads 114.0 Major Roads 110.9
PROJECT TOTAL 1,391.5 5,506 PROJECT TOTAL 1,391.5 5,604
\0(\
PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN No. 219/AMENDMENT NO.4
I. SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Page 1-1
I
I.,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PALOMA DEL SOL
Formerly The Meadows at Rancho California
.
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.5
EIR No. 235
.
Prepared by:
T &B PLANNING CONSULTANTS, INC.
3242 Halladay, Suite 100
Santa Ana. California 92705
(714) 662-2774
Contact: Barry Burnell
In Association with:
Roben Bein. William Frost & Associates - Civil Engineers
Keith International. Inc. - Civil Engineers
Ballew & Associates, Inc. - Architecture
HRP LanDesign - Planning. Landscape Architecture
Land Concern. Landscape Architecture
Pacific Soils Engineering, Inc. - Geotechnical
Douglas Wood & Associates - Environmental Analysis
Wilbur Smith Associates - Traffic Analysis
Lead Agency: City of Ternecula
Contact Planner: Matthew Fagan (909) 694-6400
Approved by City Council on January 28,1997
\c....~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
il
II SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO PALOMA DEL SOL (MEADOWS) SPECIFIC PLAN
The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan Amendment No.4 was filed pursuant to City Council
approval of the "Agreement Regarding Paloma del Sol" on January 11, 1994. Amendment
No.4 added 6.5 acres of very high density residential to Planning Area 6, added 1.5 acres
of park to Planning Area 37, reduced co=unity/neighborhood co=ercial area in
Planning Area 1 by 4.9 acres and reduced major roads by 3.1 acres. The revised acreages
are based on recent detailed engineering to establish the surrounding roadway alignments
in conjunction with design and construction of the neighborhood park in Planning Area 37.
Specific Plan Amendment No.5 increases the number of Medium density dwelling units
from 2,338 to 2,487, reduces the number of Medium-High density dwelling units from 2,356
to 2,251, reduces the number of multi-family dwelling units from 910 to 590, adds a 4.0-acre
park/recreation area site, increases the co=unity/neighborhood co=ercial acreage from
31.5 acres to 32.3 acres and reduces the roadway landscape requirements adjacent to
co=ercial uses. The acreage and dwelling unit comparisons between Specific Plan
Amendment No.4 and Specific Plan Amendment No.5 are illustrated below.
MeadowsS.P. No. 219 Meadows S.P. No. 219
Amendment No.4 Amendment No.5
Land Use Acres Dwelling Land Use Acres Dwelling
Units Units
Medium 536.0 2.338 Medium 581.0 2,487
Medium Hi"h 437.5 2,356 Medium-Hi"h 416.5 2.251
Verv Hi"h 56.3 910 Verv Hi"h 36.3 590
Commercial 31.5 Commercial 32.3
Neighborhood 17.5 Neighborhood 17.5
Commercial Co=ercial
Dav Care 2.0 Dav Care 2.0
Middle School 20.0 Middle School 20.0
Elementarv School 41.0 Elementarv School 41.0
Parks or 27.5 Parks or 31.5
Recreation Center Recreation Center
.
Paseos 111.3 Paseos 110.0
Ma;or Roads 110.9 Maior Roads 103.4
PROJECT TOTAL 1,391.5 5604 PROJECT TOTAL 1 391.5 5328
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE
PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN No. 219/AMENDMENT NO.5
1. SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Page 1-1
",Co
PALOMA DEL SOL
r
..
Specific Plan No. 219, Amendment No.6
.
'.. -;.',
; <',,-
, ..
,
. ".. . Prepared by:
~ - -~- ." . '. - -
... T&BPLANNING"~ONSULTANTS, INc;
. ,."3242 Ha1lad,ay,:Suite 100
. ,;smifa Ana;9iliforIria 92705
.'. "(714) 662~2774 .
, . "COJltapt:BarryBurnell
.,,-.
. ~ >',
"... . f
,. <'~:_?::'~~~i:~: C c
,,".
"..-
.
,,:-, ~::.! -,- .
,'. .~,.. ,
.- .'0:.';
. .....' . . ... ..~ Agency:. City ofTemecula .
~;:;::"-; coi1tad.~Ilunier.j~imDe (jimge (909)694-6400
"-. ~'; ~,?! . ':, . ji\ jj.::J ~':..... ,..::; _ ~::-?
. . /11)@ Lv L~ uf1W if; ;:'./1,
.. Nove~~;'1997'/'~[W DEe 10 19~~ ~UU
b<;..,;"c..: ~~_. J
.~ :.,,-
\C\\
1.1I '::'U!U!\'JAttl Ul' \...IttA.I."II\x1'..;:'
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO PALOMA DEL SOL (MEADows) SPECIFIC PLAN
The PALOMA DEL SOL Specific Plan Amendment No.4 was filed pursuant to City Council
approval of the "Agreement Regarding Paloma del Sol" on January 11,1994. Amendment No.
4 added 6.5 acres of very high density residential to Planning Area 6, added 1.5 acres of park
to Planning Area 37, reduced community/neighborhood commercial area in Planning Area 1
by 4.9 acres and reduced major roads by 3.1 acres. Specific Plan Amendment No.5 increasesd
the number of Medium density dwelling units from 2,338 to 2,487, reducesli the number of
Medium-High density dwelling units from 2,356 to 2,251, reclucesd the number of multi-family
dwelling units from 910 to 590, add~ a 4.0-acre park/recreation area site, increasesd. the
community/neighborhood commercial acreage from 31.5 acres to 32.3 acres and reducesd. the
"""'?-","'::-~:'" "'^~''K:i*'' '-~",".:}0.- :~:'~::"-,,"":"*''7_:7';:'''<. ::-.-'- "',
roadway landsca e re uirements adjacent to commercial uses. SpeCiflcPlanAmendiri.ellt No.
,:,:,~",~~~"_,,,""':'::'::C""'_<'~"":;"":""'.":"V'.""'f/'.. .:' '.: >.-",:"'15.,'.'><::- />>:'-::'>;",':~:':-:':':~"_:::.:k::':.':::':',,^,'"" .':,_.:" _:_.:..
e'!?i1eem.C'l:'lan:?The.park'iIlPlliri.i@.g'Areii:29AhilS
"')'!::':l:J'::'+:->>t:h~:---"\:':_:-/:;_: :":.. ,', -f: ' .. _'f;:,:_'_! '-">'~-:':- .. ..
. '.. .~~!l-?~.~asrea1l.<:E!dlip,lli~epy,;oneacre
. '.?!''f11~aW~l1iilg'iilii~~~~@~feired
1"'" "Area2u'""t01126.''''Roaawa .
...~ . f>.............."..,.. 't
th.tne'Cifs'GeneraI'oPIail';
\jb~~~ :7J42i:<t);o
-{',','d
.as
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TABLE
Meadows S.P. No. 219 Amendment No.5 Meadows S.P. No. 219 Amendment No.6
Land Use Acres Dwellin.. Units Land Use Acres Dwellin.. Units
Medium 581.0 2,487 Medium &8Q~(i ~4:!!3
Medium High 416.5 2,251 Medium-High 416.5 2!255
,-,
Very High 36.3 590 Very High 36.3 590
Commercial 32.3 Commercial 32.3
Neighborhood 17.5 Neighborhood 17.5
Commercial Commercial
Day Care 2.0 Day Care 2.0
Middle School 20.0 Middle School 20.0
Elementary School 41.0 Elementary School 41.0
Parks or 31.5 Parks or ~:5
Recreation Center Recreation Center
Paseos 110.0 Paseos 110.0
Major Roads 103.4 Major Roads 103.4
PROJECT TnTAL V191.5 5328 PROJECT TOTAL 1 391.5 5328
PALOMA DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN No. 219/AMENDMENT NO.6
1. SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Page 1-1
\<\~
;::;
(1)
3
en
u j
\0}\
I
I
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
it
I
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL JMPACT REPORT NO. 235
Environmental Impact Report No. 235 was certified by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on September 6, 1988 for the development of Specific Plan No. 219. The items
discussed in that EIR included: seismic safety, slopes and erosion, wind erosion and
blowsand, flooding, noise, air quality, water quality, toxic substances. open space and
conservation, agriculture, wildlife/vegetation, mineral resources. energy resources. scenic
highways, historic and prehistoric resources, circulation, water and sewer, fire services,
sheriff services, schools, parks and recreation, utilities, solid waste, libraries, health services,
airports and disaster preparedness. Furthermore, mandatory CEQA topics included:
cumulative impact analysis, unavoidable adverse impacts, alternatives to the proposed project
and growth inducing impacts of the proposed action.
The proposed project includes:
A Development Agreement between Bedford Development Corporation and the City of
Temecula for a ten year period, to collect development fees; receive credit for Quimby Act
requirements by developing and dedicating publiC parks and open space. and timing of
improvements to an amendment to Specific Plan No. 219 to add an eight acre park to
Planning Area 6, to make the Specific Plan consistent with the East Side Maps and to make
all the sections of the Specific Plan consistent with each other; to create 443 single family
residential, 21 open space and 4 multifamily lots (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No; 24182,
Amendment No.3), 198 single family residential, 12 open space lots (Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24814, Amendment No.3). 351 single family residential, 18 open space lots
(Vestin9 Tentative Tract Map No. 24185. Amendment No.3), 445 single family residential,
14 open space and 1 elementary school lot (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24186,
Amendment No 5). 363 single family residential. 10 open space lots (Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 24187, Amendment No.3). 351 single family residential, 26 open space, 1
elementary school, and 1 neighborhood commercial lots (Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
24188, Amendment No.3)
The addition of the Development Agreement does not change the physical impacts identified
in the EIR since it just deals with collection of fees, improvements to parks and dedication of
parks to the City for maintenance purposes. Furthermore, the amendment to the Specific Plan
does not change the physical impacts identified in the EIR since the changes in the Specific
Plan are limited to insignificant changes to graphics and, insignificant changes to the text and
addition of an 8.0 acre park to Planning Area 6. No additional units are proposed with this
amendment. Additionally. the approval of the First Time Extensions for the east side maps
(Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24182, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24184,
Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24185, Amendment No.3; Vesting Tentative
Tract Map 24186, Amendment No.5; Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24187, Amendment No.
3; Vesting Tentative Tract Map 24188, Amendment No.3) does not change the physical
impacts identified in the EIR since the east side maps are all consistent with the SpeCific Plan
and all mitigation measures have been incorporated into their design or have been conditioned
for them.
As described above, the proposed project does not change any of the impacts identified in the
EIR; therefore, an addendum to EIR No. 235 is deemed appropriate by applicable section of
CEOA for this project.
S~TA~41~PC
'}eP
CD
3
01
vA
I
II
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
I
I
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of December, 1992.
~ \A ~JJ.Q
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
AITEST:
~~_RJ
Jne Gr ,'erk
[5 ]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) 5S
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 92-95 was duly adopted by the
City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of
December, 1992 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Roberts, Stone, Parks, Munoz
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBER5:
Birdsall
D'~~
June . Greekr-City Clerk
Rcso92-95
.3-
z.ov
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
RESOLUTION NO. 92-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ADDENDUM TO EIR NO. 235; TO
CERTIFY AN ADDENDUM TO EIR NO.235 DETERMINING NO
ADDITIONAL IMPACTS AS A RESULT OF THE APPROVAL OF
THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THE SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT AND THE EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR THE EAST
SIDE MAPS LOCATED TO THE SOUTH OF PAUBA ROAD,
NORTH OF STATE IDGHWAY 79, WEST OF BUTTERFIELD
STAGE ROAD AND EAST OF MARGARITA ROAD.
WHEREAS, Bedford Development Corporation f1led a request for an Addendum to EIR
No. 235 in accordance with Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, which the City has adopted
by reference;
WHEREAS, said Addendum application was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Addendum on November 16,
1992, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission
recommended certification of said Addendum;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Addendum
on December 8, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in
support or opposition to said Addendum; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding the Addendum;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCn. OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findine:s. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall
adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 3D-month
period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
Rcao92-95
-1-
p?J
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of T mecuJ.... I
Co_WI1ty De elopment i..~~
43200 Bu51Dess k Drive. T ecuJa. CA . lU590
P.O. Box 9033, Temec:uJa . CA . 92589-9033
(5109) 694-6400 FAX (909) 6 77 .
u...-.-,.
App.~al by CORONA RANCH
Filed by: Michel A. Staples, Es ., Law Offices of Susan M. Trager, 2100 S.E. Main Street,
Suite 104, Irvine, CA 2614, Tel: (949) 752-8971; attorneys for Corona Ranch
Original Case Nu Planning Application Nos. PA99-0284 (Development Plan), PA99-0286
(Tentati e Parcel r,lap No. 29431), PA99-0285 (Specific Plan Amendment
A. PTJRPn~F. No. i), nd PA99-0283 (Development Agreement)
The pmpose the appeal pr ure is to provide ~ method of recourse for persons aggrieved by or
dissatisfied th an action take!': by an administrative agency of the City in the administration or
enforcement 0 any provisions f the Development Code.
B.
c.
. dUal who is aggx ieved by or dissatisfied with a decision made by
action. order, requirement, decision or determination shall not be
(15) calendar dllYs after service of written notice of the decision,
l.
2.
3.
ppeal by any in
alf, or with an
filed within
D.
Plan ing Commission, October 6, 1999
( If)' Director oCPlamUz.g or l'1an1liD& Comlllioaion AND Action Dauo)
Specify exactly wh t is being ap 1) Approval of development plan and tentative parcel map,
Appealing the dec sion of:
and recommenda ion to approve pecific plan .amendment and development agreement when
applicant has fail d to comply w th project's conditions of approval and mitigation measures
prohibiting incre ed flood hazar to adjacent properties; and 2) reliance on addendum to E1R
with mitigation r quirements tha the applicant has failed to implement.
"1\r"'~Ar"J.Ieu.h'.AI' '116/17'1); 1
II
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-
p
-- 0< j."r ~..pport !he appeal. Appellant must submit with this appeal Ca.ch issue which
the appellant aUe es was wroDgly ~etennined togethc:.r with every agreement and a copy of ~cry item
of .cvidence. (At h separate SiU:c ~ of paper if necessary). .
[SEE ATTACHED] .,
The record bef re the Plannin~ Commission is incorporated by reference.
Desired action to Ie tahn:
Conditional app oval of plannin application nos. PA99-0284, PA99-0286, PA99-0285 .and
PA99-0283 on onstruction of he "interceptor channel" facilities prior to issuance of
building permit.
In the event any '~otice of Appealllpplicant fails to answer any infonnation set forth above, then
the request will bF returned to the :pellant, with a statement of the deficiencies. The appellant.
shall be allowed five (5) calendar. avs in whicl1 to ICIile the notice of aDoeal.
Submitted by,
LAW OFFICES OF SUSAN M. TRAGER
~L-t1L,,-0\ V-~pU1
Michele A. Staples,
Attorneys for Corona Ranch
""rAlWall\J.lI'1'LtC\U'.AI" 1/11'" kUt 2
~
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT TO NOTICE OF APPEAL BY CORONA RANCH
By this appeal, James and Mary Corona and the Corona family
(collectively, "Corona Ranch") respectfully request that the City
of Temecula ("City") city Council overturn the Planning
commission's approval of the above-referenced planning
applications and suspend all action on the Cal-Paloma Del Sol
project, including the above-referenced applications. This
appeal is based on the applicant's failure to comply with
conditions placed on the overall project prohibiting increased
flood hazards to adjoining properties, including Corona Ranch.
The Rancho Villages Development criteria and environmental
impact report 235 ("EIR") prohibit increased flood hazards to
adjacent or downstream properties. (Reference EIR 235, pp. 315-
321, attached as Exhibit "A.")
Development of the project to date has resulted in filling
the natural drainage course that formerly flowed to the north of
the Corona Ranch, across Butterfield Stage Road, to Temecula
Creek. Butterfield Stage Road improvements were constructed to
accommodate the development's alteration of the natural drainage
pattern. As a result, a flood hazard was created on Corona Ranch
that did not formerly exist in direct contravention to the Rancho
Villages Development criteria and EIR 235. (Reference Exhibit A,
page 318.)
To date, the applicant has failed to come into compliance
with the development criteria and conditions placed on the
project. Instead, the City has allowed the project to proceed on
grounds that new approvals (including the Planning Commission's
approvals that are the subject of this appeal) would not cause
any additional flood hazards to Corona Ranch and other adjoining
properties. The City is applying the wrong legal standard.
The project itself is out of compliance with conditions of
its approval. Additionally, the California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") requires preparation of a subsequent EIR for a
project, and precludes reliance on an addendum, when substantial
changes occur to the circumstances under which a project is to be
undertaken, or new information shows that project impacts will be
substantially more severe. 14 Cal. Code Regs. S 15162.
Project grading and improvements to Butterfield Stage Road
have effectively blocked drainage through the area, creating
significantly increased flood hazards to upstream properties than
were previously identified. Since 1988, there have been
significant changes in the topography of the area adjacent to the
project, including Butterfield Stage Road. The City has yet to
analyze these significant changes in the circumstances under
which the project is being carried out and to mitigate the
cor\10doc199.mas
1
1,P~
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.significant increased flood hazards. Instead, the applicant has
relied on the County of Riverside ("County") Assessment District
#159 to construct off-site interceptor channel facilities to
mitigate the increased flood hazards to other properties caused
by the project grading and/or by the flood control facilities
designed in connection with the Butterfield stage Road
improvements to accommodate the project.
Assessment District 159 is not responsible to mitigate the
increased flood hazards resulting from the project. The
applicant is. To date, the necessary interceptor channel
facilities have not been constructed. In fact, representatives
of the County have recently indicated that there are insufficient
funds in Assessment District 159 to construct the necessary
facilities. Further, the applicant is responsible to fund 95% of
the costs of those facilities.
No further implementation of the project should proceed and
no further project approvals should be granted unless and until
adequate facilities have been constructed to alleviate the flood
hazards caused to Corona Ranch.
cor\10doc199.mas
2
1,.PV>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
, I
L,PoW OFI"'IC~S 01"
SUSAN M. T"'AGE:R
.. .....o.t.",(h._ ,,"",,.-0_',0)"
T"'I: \....NO"".aFH' BUIL.DING
2100 S e MAIN STr:lIl;CT
S...IT~ ,0'"
IRVIN!:, c:....LlFORNIA ~~61.q.
SUS.AN Jo4. TRAOe.Jt
.,.t\".t~"'ON&:
(~.ilIt 752-8g71
MICHELl!. A. ~TA"LI:S
TELl!.COPICFl
l'Iiil4.VI B63-geO....
5-MAIL.:
trBgerlaw@earthUnk.net
October 19, 1999
VIA TELECOPY
city council
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: John De Gange
Re: Planning Application Nos. PA99-0283, PA99-0285i
Environmental Impact Report No. 235, Ca1-Paloma Del
Sol -- October 19, 1999, Agenda Item No. 10
Dear Honorable council Members:
We represent James and Mary Corona and the Corona family
(collectively, the "Coronas"). The Coronas own land adjacent to
the above-referenced project, northeast of the intersection at
Butterfield stage Road and Highway 79.
The coronas respectfully request that the city of Temecula
("City") City council suspend all action on the Cal-Paloma Del
Sol project, including the above-referenced applications, until
after construction of the flood control facility necessary to
mitigate project-related flooding hazards to the public roads and
private property adjacent to the development. The Coronas also
request that a subsequent environmental impact report ("EIR") be
prepared to evaluate the current hydrology of the area and
mitigate the increased flood hazards surrounding the project
prior to consideration of the above-referenced applications.
The Coronas' requests are consistent with the laws
applicable to the City Council's proposed actions today. The
city is required to fully enforce mitigation measures through
permit conditions, agreements or other measures. Public
Resources Code S 21081.6. Likewise, one purpose of a development
agreement is to assure the applicant that the project may proceed
in accordance with existinQ policies. rules and regulations. and
sub;ect to conditions of approval - not to allow a project to
coc\101trS99.MBs
-z,01
ODlI?I/?l7iI71....J hTP"nN
hhhlvhgh~h ~ ~39~~1 W N~sns
c:;c:; : ["[ 66/61/01
, I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-.AW O"-I"IC!:S 0"
SUSAN M. TRAGER
,. l2aOrl[:"SICNAl... '::D..~....ftON
city council
October 19, 1999
Page 2
proceed despite its failure to comply with project requirements.
Government Code S 65864.
EIR No. 235 was approved and certified for the project over
11 years ago. No subsequent EIR has been prepared since then,
even though environmental conditions and circumstances have
significantly changed. The EIR imposed mitigation measures on
the project consistent with applicable provisions of the
Environmental Hazards and Resources Element of the General Plan
and the Rancho Villages Development criteria. Those measures
prohibit increased flood hazards to adjacent or downstream
properties and require that all flood-related hazards must be
adequately mitigated. They also require preparation of an in-
depth study of the Temecula Creek flood plan. (Reference ErR
235, pp. 315-321.)
So far, development of the project has resulted in filling
the natural drainage course that formerly flowed to the north of
the corona Ranch, across Butterfield stage Road, to Temecula
creek. Butterfield Stage Road improvements were constructed to
accommodate the development's alteration of the natural drainage
pattern. As a result, a flood hazard was created on Corona Ranch
that did not formerly exist in direct contravention to the
development criteria applicable to the project and the mitigation
measures set forth in EIR 235. (Reference EIR 235, pages 316,
318. )
To date, the applicant has failed to come into compliance
with the development criteria and conditions placed on the
project. Instead, the city has allowed the project to proceed on
grounds that new approvals would not cause any additional flood
hazards to Corona Ranch and other adjoining properties. The city
is illegally permitting the project to proceed without enforcing
the mitigation measures adopted for the project.
Project grading has altered the drainage course that
previously existed in the pre-project condition. Since 1988,
there have been significant changes in the topography of the area
adjacent to the project, including Butterfield Stage Road. The
city has yet to analyze these significant changes in the
circumstances under which the project is to be carried out and
mitigate the significant increased flood hazards. Instead, the
project proponent has asserted that the County of Riverside
~or\101tt599.me~
QfAfA /rDIf/l...J h T P . n"'-l
hhh1Phqh~h ~ ~~~H~l W NHsns
ss:n 66/51/01
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.AW O,....IC~S 0"-
SUSAN M. TRAGER
/>. ..orE:50SI0NN.. CORPQA_TIOJIl
City Council
October 19, 1999
Page 3
("County") Assessment District 1159 is to construct an off-site
interceptor channel to mitigate any increased flood hazards to
other properties caused by the Paloma Del Sol project grading
and/or by the flood control facilities designed in connection
with the Butterfield Stage Road improvements to accommodate the
Paloma Del Sol project.
Last year, at the City Council's meeting on January 13,
1998, in connection with application PA97-0158, the Coronas
brought to the city Council's attention a technical report
regarding the project's detention basin (Hydrology and Hydraulics
Report, Paloma Del Sol Interim Detention Basin in Tract 24182,
prepared by Keith International, Inc.). At that meeting, the
city council requested that the applicant submit a copy of the
report for inclusion in the project files, and the applicant
committed to do so. The interim detention basin report is
incorporated by reference herein.
The report provides evidence that unless and until the
necessary interceptor channel is constructed, public roadways
adjacent to the project site are in danger of significant
flooding. The report confirms that the project has been designed
with the assumption that the interceptor channel is in place.
(Reference interceptor channel report, Executive Summary,
paragraph 2.) Based on the data and conclusions set forth in the
interceptor channel report, unless and until the interceptor
channel is constructed, the project's detention basin will fill
in a little more than two hours during a lOO-year storm event,
turning Highway 79 into a flood control channel for the remaining
four hours of the storm, carrying approximately 1,500 cubic feet
of water per second. The maximum depth of water crossing
Butterfield stage Road would be two feet, and the maximum depth
of water crossing Highway 79 would be one foot. The full force
of the 100-year flood would be delivered upon the commercial
corner at Highway 79 and Margarita.
The record before the City shows that the avvlicant is
responsible to mitigate flood hazards resulting from the project.
It also shows that the County has recently indicated that there
are insufficient funds remaining in AD #159 to construct the
interceptor channel. Under AD 1159, the applicant is responsible
for over 90% of the cost of the interceptor channel. Unless
required by the City to construct the flood control channel, the
cor\101tc599.mas
1?'b
.-or->""" ,......,..",-" ,'Tn ""...1
h~.C:-.1T7~qh01t=, ~ >-J=lqH>-Il W NH~nc,
cc: >1 hh/hUI'H
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LP-'\N o"''',CIP:S or
SUSAN M. T~AGE:~
". PRQr",&,&.o_ l;OAPO""'TION
city council
October 19, 1999
Page 4
applicant (with over 90% of the voting power) could easily defeat
any attempt to impose a supplemental assessment.
There is also no evidence in the record that the required
in-depth assessment of the Temecula Creek flood plain was ever
conducted during the project's final design and preparation of
the tentative tract maps, as required by mitigation measures
adopted -for the project. On this record, the city can no longer
relieve the applicant from its legal responsibilities and instead
rely on AD 1159 to mitigate the project-related flood hazards.
It is illegal for the city to approve the current
application based on an addendum to an outdated EIR. The
California Environmental Quality Act requires preparation of a
subsequent EIR for a project when substantial changes occur to
the circumstances under which a project is to be undertaken, or
neW information shows that project impacts will be substantially
more severe. 14 Cal. Code Regs. S 15162. Project grading and
improvements to Butterfield Stage Road have effectively blocked
drainage through the area, creating significantly increased flood
hazards to adjacent properties than was previously identified in
EIR 235.
In fact, EIR 235 acknowledges that it has not analyzed the
project impacts related to the large natural drainage system that
formerly flowed north of Corona Ranch across Butterfield stage
Road, and through the project site, in reliance on the "in-depth"
hydrologic study required in the mitigation measures. (Reference
ElR 235, p. 316.) Ten years after the project EIR was approved,
no interceptor facility has been constructed to alleviate the
flood hazards, contrary to assumptions made in project design and
the prior environmental impact analysis. As the agency that is
granting the next discretionary approval for the Paloma Del Sol
project, it is the City'S responsibility to prepare the
subsequent EIR. 14 Cal. Code Regs. S 15162(c).
When it adopted the first amendment to Specific Plan No.
219, the city adopted a condition requiring that an environmental
assessment shall be conducted for each tract, change of zone,
plot plan, specific plan amendment, or any other discretionary
permit required to implement the specific plan. At a minimum,
the condition requires that the environmental assessment must
utilize the evaluation of impacts addressed in EIR 235.
CQc'lOltr599.m~s
po...
~"""""'''---''''r'o,...r>'- , "-'.-.W,,, II ..,wrnr
rr -rT C:L ,eT /tAT
I.
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAW OI'"I""ICe.S OF
SuSAN M_ TRAG~R
-. 1>AO"1>65'O,"840 l;,O~l'>"TIQ'"
city council
October 19, 1999
Page 5
(Reference Resolution 91-36, Condition of Approval No. 12.) The
city's reliance on the proposed addendum to EIR 235 would be
contrary to the conditions it imposed on the project.
The city's proposed resolution, ordinances, and
determination of consistency to EIR 235 are not supported by
evidence in the record. The information provided in this letter
and in previous testimony before the Planning Commission on
behalf of the Coronas contradict the proposed findings.
The Coronas request that the city deny approval of the
above-referenced applications and order the project proponent to
cease and desist any further implementation of the project until
the in-depth hydrologic study has been completed, the flood
control facility has been constructed, and an adequate subsequent
EIR analyzing the current circumstances has been completed.
sincerely,
LAW OFFICES OF SUSAN M. TRAGER
A Professional Corporation
~~0....Jtaf2.eu~
Michele A. Staples
MAS:ch
cc: Mr. Steve Corona (via telecopy)
Peter Thorson, Esq. (via telecopy)
'Qr\}Oltr~99_m~~
.-,,-,,-, _iOnn' r"'!"c' ."",
hc:r=.1 t;.j'::"Oc:.Vlt= ~ >-J'::lt:')H>-l1 lAI t-JHc:nc.
QC:C"T kk/ht/(;1T
uesds tabor 19 1999 8:17am .- Fraa '714 651 0247' .- Poge 1
Fax:714-651-<l247
O:t 19'99 9:23
P.01
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
avala
CONSTRUCTION CO.. INC.
GENERAL ENGINEERING
October 19, 1999
Qty of TemecuIa
Community Development Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Texnecu1a, Ca. 92590
RE: PLANNING APPLICATION I'S:
. PA99'-0284 DEVELOPfdENT PLAN
PA99-0286 TENTAllYE PARCEL MAP f,29431
PA99..()235 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT #f7
PA99-0283 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Dear Council Members and Planning CoIIlIIlission Members:
Please excuse me for the tardiness of this letter regarding the above Development
Plan. I just recently learned of your decisiOl.'\ to allow this project to go forward
without addressing the drainage iIIld flooding: problems it will create on my
property located on the southeast comer of Butterfield Stage Rd and De Portola
(approx. 20 acres). I am. out of town on business and not able to attend the
appeal process meeting being held on Tuesday, October 19, 1999.
On June 30, 1999 at an ownersmeeting of ASSess.ment District #159, Jeny Alegria.
an engineer for the City of Temecu1a Public Works Department, stated that
approximately 2BO acres west of Butterfield St\lge Rd between De Portola and
Hwy 79 would Dot be bUilt until the 100 year flood problem was solved
benefiting all property OYnleIS that were included in A.D. #159. Does this
decision by the pJanniilg commission. dated October 6, 1999, indicate that the
City of Temecu1a has solved the potential 100 year flood problems on my
property? H so, where are. the maps .and plaDS for the neW drainage routes?
Who is going to pay for thil! and at what cost? Has the City of TeD.leCllla taken
over A.D. #159 from the County of Riverside and the means to complete this
project? Why does the West side of Butterfield Stage Rd drain properly and not
the East side of Butterfield . Stage Rd with a projected 100 year stonn? Was
Butterfield Stage Rd. meant to be a Dam?
I have many more questions and data I would like to present to this plaIuUng
couunission regarding this issue. However, I am sure you now understand how 1
~\o
16402 E. CONSTRUCTION CIRCLE. IRVINE, CA 92606-4408 . (949) 651-0221 . Fax (949) 552-8597
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
October 19 1999 8:17.. -- From '714 651 D247' -- Page 2
... SI'M'l.A Fax:714--6S1-{)247
lkt 19 '99
9:23
P.02
2
. feel about this matter. This drainage problem should have been solved many
years ago and will probably end up in the courts with everybody being sued; if
that is what it takes to get this.problem resolved, so be it.
Once more, I apologize for being late with this: letter and not being in proper
fo1'Jr\. I am enclosing a copy pf my tax bill with property identification for your
information.
Thank you for you cooperation with this matter.
Sincerely,
./."___ StU"ct.
Leonard Savala
President
I
I
I
I
.--:~"
{:.':;:;t/2ti.
-
.,
.; -
.,.
,.
-
..
....:.. ."
..~ . .~-:'
".
-
., ...".
t.~~":.;':;~'~~
, . -
,
..
.....
d
"
1\
..
.......
.... .
'. .- - ".. .~
'~~~:~i~;;~;.:~j~ ~ ~\.~:
- ....; :.:..:..
'" ".-
~~~~::::2:
-
:.f.
....
.
-
......
..
"
'"
..
"':11
e:)>
"e:
m,...
,,-
4~
>&
><0
nz
oz -,..-",
rf!! t..
f;;r
n
d
"
"".
-n02
o <'
.. m
'TI:D
-Ul
UJ _
o 0
am
~o
Ill. 0
... c:
c.;.Z
~ ~
...(f)
_ m.
.....0
coC:
<0:;0,
(l)m
~o
..... -c
o :D
~ 0
~ "0.
c.... m.
.: :0
:I ....
ell -<
-~ ;;j
.....x
<0 to.
<0-
<O~
A-
o
-'"
"0
or
. .
..3
000
~~~
N~5
0'; .:c
:i:.~
- ~CL
~;[
. -~
...0.
~o~
4.~.
~a~
n<.
:a.!!n
..!!...
N~~
~. -
0- .
"'n~
...
...=
0-
~o
-3
.
~
iO
'C
=r
o
oil:
~ n
-
....'"
ClIO
0'"
-
"''''
"""
"''''
. .
"''''
Ul Ul
00
CO
0)> ..
~ ~ a;:
_ i- .'1:1
..... .!
. :<
'" ....
....l-'fI} ~ \0
:1'''':0- . 2: .
<..< .::.. c: ~
....0)11 .'. ~ \0
=Nt"1 ::u
1:':1 ~ .-.... )!II
- 0;- n
.... :<l
nat" 0;
>000 . r.a
2:0 ....
\Ofn!2: \D::Z:
Nt-3:J:t1 \C [Il
...HtI:;tJ CD'"
....cl:l
....a ....
~i" to:l(
.... :0-.
0:><: ,,<: 'U
=> _. >' :ll"
8 t" '"
n:z:. .,:0-
8t" . .... ~ ....
lzJ .. :~;..
PI ".:~.. 'V
=: . ", t:rJ ~
. 0
" 2: 0
. :0- ..,
.::::a 0
.' tj ........
., 0
.. 1'1 -1
,. 0
II '. '"
g :t- to
:; ~ ::::
;;: :z:
* t" '"
0; ....
0; ..,
:z: III
n
o
.. 0 0... 0
.0 \D ....: ~!i!!
...... w '" =
z- ..... Ilco~
:!;; Z_C)Oct.c::.:J
~ :a,,:s::.......o!'.....t
~ mO""C....O'i;\O..
~ <:00:::
~ m;s::o III '" ","
~ :0 .... '" 111 g:,
~I mcn~):J N~ N:
j' -2 ....:; ....;;.
. mO.... ~'"-.....
. _~ ~~o:z
o ~!i 0;;;
m ... (T 0 c;
~ = .... a::
I I::
.... .... "
.
.
"
"
..
.
A
<
.
;;
,
.
1
,
o
~
r
f
.
!
.
1
~
.
il:
.
~
ii
:~
.
a
"-
..
,
~
~
.
,
o
.
..
i
i
%
~
l
.
;II ~';l~."l c
; ,"'~;DZ
",c:;eo
~"'.!l'
I~lll.c .
~.z,~ .
'I.
W ." .
~7~;': .:
. t'~)
.l!;.-~~:I
~r'~'gi'
...
-i:n:n:n:n:n;::mi
~<<<<~!!1fna
m8000o::n~
o 000:1:0'"
c)>)>)>)>oO"tl3
>ccoq(')~]>
-".........- ~-:o
"'l1<.nU'....'""'!r--f-'
>CDCD-~ ~~
:n",,,,g:lll~z~
Gi!ijm",,,,:ri~:I:
?'ll_mm~-iO
- m:l1:n-:oo
G')oocnffi-ffioo'
~g)OOOOO<mo
2m (JI):-oOJ'm
r."II(D m-fl:D
~ cnoo-l
00> '-l<en
< en <
<
....
wO\...:I....
....0\11\0-... ....
m~....WUt""--.1
~""\O"'tJ""
........ .
N\OUtU10\lJ10
cn.r-.Ooflo"CJ\-1W
cri
ftiftiuiqjqjO
00000.9
UH[U(UD ((J
. I\)
...,~...,...I(n",'"
mlDmm.....a.
.....":""--.....coa
Cb C au;,I ~ 0)
.........a.....a..-:.....U)
(D(OCOCOO(,)
0000.....
~~
~F
:ll~
oE
z..
~
....
.1Jl
....,
...
IJl
111
...
~i ~ ~ =
i~ g: ~'1i
~i iiI~
~~ ;: "'
1; ~
.. ..
~ ;;
o
~
... ,..
...... <=
~~f:m...
Ill'" IJl
0.... ..,
100
.. '"
....... UI
ol>ClI ....
-.
!
...
o
;l
r
,.
8
'"
...
-Ih
lA
...
111
....
10
...
o
-... )>
ot.Q,
-~ Q,
.a~....<CI)
_~o....
i~~CJ\
= ~
'"
10
ClI
ut
041$"" ~
---CI.
C;;;;CII~A.
3g~-
.~"Q~
:.c_
;:.. u.
- .
...
'"
10
'"
'"
I
,~
.'0
i:ll'"tl
:1tI.....
",J<"I1'll
. 'ft!h
. .;;cn
.. fill'll
", :'-.::':",
'.~~ I.:: C.:;r=.... I'll
. , I'll
lll'"tl
~'"i
.<::0
Ill'll
?"t:I
(10
. c: ::Q
. f. :lI'"i
~::j::~:n ~ ~
::0
'ft! :n
o
~~
'<"Ie:
"':tJ
iii
..:tJ
o I'll
c:0
:lIO
'ill:n
.00
~cn
.::1
'"
....
ClI
.
.....
In
'"
ClI
'"
'"
....
'"
...
""
;'fJ
'ClI
'"
'.
-r.'?-~~~~
:~.<~:;.;.
:;':
~
?
.I8qOl
.-6L
666L
8
weLL
WO~.
~Ll
LI7W-1S9-l7lL:XE.:l
[ .Bed .. ,l~ZO L59
l:U
61
66.
17(;:6
roOd
I
I
M. James Lorenz
Samuel C. AJhadeff
Jerry M. Cannon
Robert D. Rose
Keith R Solar
Robert J. Parks
Philip D. Oberhansley
Joseph l. Marshall
Leslie C. Detwiler
Glenn M. Feeley
Thomas 1. lord
Madeline Clark Cahill
J.l. O'Donnell, Jr.
LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP
I
27555 YNEZ ROAD, SUITE 203
TEMECUlA, CALIFORNIA 92591-4677
MAIN TELEPHONE: (909) 699-9088
FACSIMILE: (909) 699-9878
Michael J. Barry
Richard J. Bayless
Craig V. Butler
Cyril J. Oantchev
Genie E. Harrison
S. Douglas Kerner
Frank J. Polek
les W. Robertson
Traci M. Selby
Marjeta D. Six
A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Offices in San Diego. Temecula, Lafayette, and Los Angeles, California
I
Robert K. Edmunds
Craig S. Engstrand
Charles F. Gorder, Sr.
I
October 19,1999
I
SAMUEL C. AlHADEFF
SAlHADEFF@LORENZLAW.COM
(909) 699-9088
9103.001
I
The Honorable Steven J. Ford
Mayor
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Same letter to all Council
cc: Shawn Nelson
Gary Thornhill
Peter Thorson
I
I
Re:
Planning Application PA99-0284 (Development Plan), PA99-0286 (Tentative
Parcel Map No. 29431), and Planning Application No. P A99-0285 (Specific
Plan Amendment) and Planning Application No_ PA99-0823 (Development
Agreement)(Collectively "Applications") Agenda Item 10
I
I
Dear Mayor Ford:
I
We have been asked by Newland Communities to briefly respond to the Notice of Appeal
that was filed with regard to the above applications. We belief that staff has thoroughly
examined the issues concerning this particular project. The Planning Commission held a series
of hearings, and thoroughly reviewed this project. The appeal is not well founded.
I
Enclosed is a copy of a letter Jim Delhamer, Senior Vice-President of Newland
Communities sent to the Planning Commission with regard to these same issues. We believe this
letter refutes these issues and supports the actions taken by the staff and the Planning
Commission in recommending approval of these applications.
I
I
Sincerely,
I
f~ {; ",:.L~" .
--~~v
Samuel C. Alhadeff, of
LORENZ ALHADEFF CANNON & ROSE, LLP
I
SCA:sld
Enclosure as noted
e:\DA T A ICUENTSINEWLAND COMMUNITIESIFORD LEITER IO.18.DOC
I
I
-z,.\'Z--
MEMBER OF COMMERCIAL LAW AFFILIATES, INDEPENDENT BUSINESS AND LmGATlON LAWFIRMS IN PRINCIPAL CITIES WORLD~DE
ILCT-07-S9 09.08 FROM.
I'
IlIEWLA.IilD
CO,..,UNlnes
I
I
'J'ND CAI,IFQnNI.i\
;!I Ync% Read
:\ujta2~
r'IUllo CA 9~3914tillS
.0 ~~'55Tl
'1'9'094'~nI2
l' Ua:r~,..nd.I.s.nLr::nl"l1
,......putodl!.lsoJ.!:Om
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10.909 6". 3612
PACE
2/3
October 6, 1999
Mr. Ron Guerriero, Chairman
Mr. Mike Naggar
Mr. Andrew Webster
Mr. David Matthewson
Ms. Linda Fahey
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject:
Planning Application P A99-0284 (Development Plan),
PA99-0286 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 29431), Planning
Application No. P A99-0285 (Specific Plan Amendment) and
Planning Application No. PA99-0823 (Development Agreement)
Dear Mr. Guerriero and Commission:
On September 29, 1999 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the
above referenced applications. During the course of the hearing certain public
comments were made regarding drainage issues both on-site and off-site of our
Paseo del Sol community. This letter is written in response to those comments.
Since its purchase in December 1995, Newland has been the developer of the Paseo
del Sol Master Planned Community. Paseo del Sol makes up approximately one-
half of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan 219 and is included, along with numerous
other properties, in Assessment District 159 ("AD 159").
As you know, AD 159 has provided many public improvements of regional
significance to the South Temecula area Thus, the constrUction ofButterlield
Stage Road and Highway 79 South in 1993 was not intended to benefit solely one
property owner, but rather to improve the overall traffic circulation of the region to
the benefit of all people living in this end oftown.
One of the public improvements to be provided by AD 159 is the Butterfield
Interceptor Channel. This channel is to be built to the east and upstream from our
Pasco del Sol community and its purpose is to collect waters flowing from these
undeveloped areas and divert them into Temecula Creek. Newland has been
working diligently with both AD 159 and the County of Riverside for over three
years in an anemplto facililate and accelerate the construction of the Bunerfield
Interceptor Channel.
1--\'?;J
ItCT-07-99 09.08 FROM.
10.909 694 3612
PACE
3/3
I
61
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Planning Commission
October 6.1999
Page two
In the meantime, in satisfaction of the development conditions required by both
Riverside County Flood Control and the City of Temecula's Public Works
Department, Newland has constructed an approximately twenty acre interim
detention basin at the northwest comer of Bunerfield Stage Road and Highway 79
South. TI1is basin was designed 8IId constructed pursuant to Riverside County
Flood Control and City ofTemecuJa review and approval. Further, the basin fully
protects the Paseo del Sol community during rare storm events in which water may
enter from areas to the east. To give you a sense of the rarity of the storm event that
might cause water to enter the basin, you should know that during the El Niiio of
recent years this twenty acre facility remained dry.
On February 2, 1998 the Planning Commission approved revisions to our Vesting
Tentative Tract Map 24182 ("VTM 24182") and, based upon staff analysis, found
the project to be: in conformity with the previously certified Environmental Impact
Report. The continued presence of the detention basin was assured as the
Conditions of Approval for VTM 24182 require that the detention basin or 8II
equivalent facility remain in place until upstream drainage facilities are installed to
mitigate off-site flows.
Finally, we would like to respectfully bring to the Planning Commission's attention
that the current planning applications before you in no way impact the drainage
conditions existing at our detention basin or the Corona property, both of which are
found approximately one mile upstream. The properties under current review are
picked up by storm drain facilities existing or to be built in DePortola and Margarita
Roads.
We will be available to answer 8IIY questions you may have at the Planning
Commission hearing. Thank you for your kind attention.
cc: Ron Parks
Dean Meyer
;2.\'\
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
1. The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the
general plan.
2. The planning agency fmds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following;
a. There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action
proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which
will be studied within a reasonable time.
b. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or
interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately
inconsistent with the plan.
c. The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances.
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area
Community Plan, (hereinafter " SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as
the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within
the boundaries of the. City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan
guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General
Plan.
. C. The City Council in approving the proposed Addendum, makes the following
fmdings, to wit:
1. The Addendum was prepared since the proposed project does not change
any of the impacts identified in EIR No. 235.
D. The Addendum is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Not Applicable.
Section 3. Conditions. A Mitigation Monitoring Program will implement the mitigation
measures identified in EIR No. 235.
R01092-95
-2-
I
.'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
,
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I