HomeMy WebLinkAbout073102 PC Special Meeting Agenda
..
u.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 36.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
July 31, 2002 - 6:00 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution: No. 2002-022
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Guerriero
RollCall:
Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chairman Chiniaeff
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of July 31, 2002
2 Appointment of Chairman and Co-Chairman
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2002\07-31 -02.doc
3 Minutes-
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve Minutes from June 26, 2002
4 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before
a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to
the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences
delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued from June 5. 2002
5 Planninq Application No. PAOO-0507. for the desiqn and construction of a 70-room fourv'
stOry hotel buildinq on a 1.35-acre vacation parcel located on the south side of Zevo
Drive. west of Diaz Road. - Michael McCov. Proiect Planner II
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
New Items
6 PROPOSALS: PA01-0522. a Zone Chanqe to establish a Planned Development Overlav
and modifv the land use standards to allow for a mix of uses on 55 acres includinq a church. II
school and office/commercial uses over propertv located on the north side of the State
Route 79 South. beqinninq 480 feet east of Jedidiah Smith Road and continuinq east for
4.000 feet.
PAOO-0470. a Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit to operate a church and
private school with 146.826 square feet of total reliqious buildinq area, and 18,000 students ,/
and 136.771 square feet of total school buildinq area: and to place seventeen (17)
temporary modular classrooms on a 39-acre site. located on the north side of the State
Route 79 South. beqinninq 480 feet east of Jedidiah Smith Road and continuinq east for
3.000 feet.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2002\07-31 -02.doc
2
PAOO-0470. a Development Plan Development Plan to for the desiqn and construction of a
church and school campus to accommodate 1.800 students on a 39-acre site. The overall
proposal will include 146,826 square feet of reliqious institution which includes: a 1.500-
seat. 26.927 square foot. interim sanctuary with assemblv room and nursery. a 300-seat.
5.856 square foot chapel. a 11.860 square foot adult education buildinq. a 3.500 seat.
43.727 square foot worship center. and a two story-four level parkinq structure (with a 918./
spaces totalinq 380.023 square feet): and 136.771 square feet of school facilities for first
throuqh twelfth made classroom facilities consistinq of: two interim modular school campus
with a total of 17 modular classroom buildinqs. two elementarv school buildinq totalinq
64.156 square feet. a 28.826 square foot middle school. a 17.900 square foot hiqh school. a
9.695 square foot preschool. two-unit field house/ residence buildinqs. lit athletic fields. and
a 16.194 square foot qvmnasium: and a two stOry. 44.406 square foot administration/office
buildinq: located on north side of State Hiqhwav 79 South beqinninq 480 feet east of
Jedidiah Smith Road and continuinq east for approximatelv 3.000 feet.
LOCATION: On the north side of State Route 79 South beqinninq 480 feet east of
Jedidiah Smith Road and continuinq east for 4.000 feet for propertv known as Lots 1. 2. 3. 4,
5. 6. 7, 8. 9. & 10 of Tract No. 15211: also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-
001 thru -004 & 959-070-001 thru -006.
Thomas Thornslev. Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE
INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PA01-0522 AND PAOO-
0470, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF
JEDIDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001
THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2002\07-31 -02.doc
3
6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-
0522, A CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
(PO) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY- 6 (PDO-6),
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AND ADOPTING THE
STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE
ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT, LOCATED ON NORTH
SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET
EAST OF JEDIDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST
FOR APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN
AS LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211;
ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-
001 THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006."
6.3 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, FOR THE OPERATION OF A
146,826 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH COMPLEX ON A 39-ACRE
SITE, INCLUDING A 1,500-SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT,
INTERIM SANCTUARY WITH ASSEMBLY ROOM AND
NURSERY; A 300 SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL; A
3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER; A
9,695 SQUARE FOOT PRE-SCHOOL; AND THE PLACEMENT
OF SEVENTEEN (17) MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDINGS AS
TEMPORARY FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST
OF JEDIDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF
TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-070-003 THRU -006.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2002\07-31-02.doc
4
6.4 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN, FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH AND SCHOOL CAMPUS TO
ACCOMMODATE 1,800 STUDENTS ON A 39-ACRE SITE. THE
OVERALL PROPOSAL WILL INCLUDE 146,826 SQUARE FEET
OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION WHICH INCLUDES: A 1,500-
SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT, INTERIM SANCTUARY WITH
ASSEMBLY ROOM AND NURSERY, A 300-SEAT, 5,856
SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL, A 11,860 SQUARE FOOT ADULT
EDUCATION BUILDING, A 3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE FOOT
WORSHIP CENTER, AND A TWO STORY-FOUR LEVEL
PARKING STRUCTURE (WITH 918 SPACES TOTALING
380,023 SQUARE FEET); AND 136,771 SQUARE FEET OF
SCHOOL FACILITIES FOR FIRST THROUGH TWELFTH
GRADE CONSISTING OF: AN INTERIM MODULAR SCHOOL
CAMPUS WITH A TOTAL OF 17 MODULAR CLASSROOM
BUILDINGS, TWO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BUILDING
TOTALING 64,156 SQUARE FEET, A 28,826 SQUARE FOOT
MIDDLE SCHOOL, A 17,900 SQUARE FOOT HIGH SCHOOL, A
9,695 SQUARE FOOT PRESCHOOL, TWO-UNIT FIELD
HOUSEl RESIDENCE BUILDINGS, AND A 16,194 SQUARE
FOOT GYMNASIUM; AND A TWO STORY, 44,406 SQUARE
FOOT ADMINISTRATION/OFFICE BUILDING, LOCATED ON
NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING
480 FEET EAST OF JEDIDIAH SMITH ROAD AND
CONTINUING EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR
PROPERTY KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 &
959-070-003 THRU -006.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: August 7, 2002 - Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\2002\07-31-02.doc
5
ITEM #2
ELECT
CHAI R
AND
VICE CHAIR
ITEM #3
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 26, 2002
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M.,
on Wednesday, June 26, 2002, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall,
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Flag salute by Chairman Chiniaeff.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio, and
Chairman Chiniaeff.
Absent:
Commissioner Guerriero.
Also Present:
Director of Planning Ubnoske,
Assistant City Attorney Curley,
Deputy Director of Public Works Parks,
Fire Captain McBride,
Senior Planner Hazen,
Associate Planner Harris,
Associate Planner Thornsley,
Assistant Planner Preisendanz,
Project Planner Rush,
Project Planner McCoy, and
Minute Clerk Hansen.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Vince Didonato, 41635 Enterprise Circle North, representing the Alhambra Group,
noted that he now has a web page which provides information regarding trees and
shrubs, relaying the website address, as follows: www.alhambraqroup.net; for Chairman
Chiniaeff, advised that the plantings were differentiated by areas, denoting which
plantings were appropriate for that region, advising that there were some plantings which
would freeze in Temecula which was noted; and for Commissioner Olhasso, relayed that
the majority of plantings denoted appropriate for this area were drought and frost
tolerant.
R: PlanComrrvminUles!062602
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of June 26, 2002.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve Minutes from May 15, 2002.
2.2 Approve Minutes from June 5, 2002.
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-3.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and voice vote reflected
approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Planninq Application No. 01-0307 (Development Plan) - Matthew Harris
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0307 pursuant to Section 15332
of the California Environmental Quality Act;
4.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-016
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0307, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 24,170
INDUSTRIAL! WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 1.50
VACANT ACRES. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF ZEVO DRIVE, WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 909-360-034
Via color renderings, Associate Planner Harris presented the staff report (per agenda
material), noting that this item was continued from the May 5th meeting in order for the
applicant to address architectural issues, listed as follows: to replace the painted knock-
out panels with glass panels (which the applicant has opted to implement), to enhance
A:P1anCOf'l'\ITVminules/062602
2
the building's articulation along the parapet (noting that an additional foot of height has
been added to the parapet at the main entry panel), to add more building articulation
overall (relaying that a four foot, eight-inch deep inset along the street frontage was
added), and to add more character and visual interest at the main entrance (advising
that the landscape architect has modified the entrance flatwork, as well as the landscape
plan to provide additional visual character); and advised that staff was recommending
that the revised project plan be approved.
Mr. Walt Allen, representing the applicant, noted the applicant's agreement with the
Conditions of Approval associated with this particular project.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
5 Planninq Application No. 02-0284 (Substantial Conformance) - Michael McCov
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-017
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 02-0284, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR A SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TO PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0385, WHICH REQUESTS
ELIMINATING THE APPROVED TENANT ENTRANCE
CANOPIES ALONG THE FRONT ELEVATION OF
BUILDING "A", AND PLANTING SIX (6) 12 TO 15-FOOT
BROWN TRUNK HEIGHT ACCENT QUEEN PALM
TREES WITHIN THE TENANT SUITE ENTRANCE
PLANTERS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD AT THE TERMINUS OF COLT
COURT AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.
909-360-025
By way of overheads, Project Planner McCoy provided an overview of the project plan
(of record), highlighting the modifications to the previously approved development plan
on Building A, and the removal of six tenant entrance canopies to be replaced with six
evergreen accent trees; noted that it was staff's recommendation that taller evergreen
trees (a 36-inch to 48-inch box size evergreen tree, or a minimum 10-foot Queen Palm)
should be provided within the planter sections fronting each tenant entrance, advising
that the applicant had been agreeable to adding 10-foot high Queen Palm trees; and
relayed that with the taller trees, staff was recommending approval of the project plan.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Project Planner McCoy noted that the height of the 36-
inch to 48-inch box size trees would be approximately 14-15 feet, confirming that the
applicant has agreed to install the 10-foot Queen Palms so as to not block the tenants'
signage.
R:PlanComm'ninuteslO62602
3
Mr. David Silver, the applicant, confirmed that the applicant had opted to install the
recommended Queen Palms due to concerns regarding the visibility of the signage; and
for Chairman Chiniaeff, advised that the landscape plan on the sides of the building
would not be changed.
For the record, Commissioner Telesio noted that the resolution title on the agenda was
worded differently than the resolution in the agenda material (the resolution for
signature), advising that the resolution for signature was correct.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation, subject to the following:
-Modify
. Revise the resolution associated with this approval to be the resolution contained
in the staff report (the resolution for signature), and
. That 1 O-foot Queen Palms be added within the six tenant entrance planters. (It is
noted that the resolution reflects a requirement for 12-15 foot Queen Palms
due to the applicant's subsequent agreement to install such.)
The motion was seconded by Chairman Chiniaeff and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
6 Planninq Application No. 02-0036 - Rick Rush
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0036 pursuant to Section 15332 of .
California Environmental Quality Act;
6.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 02-0036, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE A 36,000
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.01 VACANT
ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED ON RIDGEGATE
DRIVE AND WEST OF RIDGE PARK DRIVE KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 940-310-040
Via overheads, Project Planner Rush presented the staff report (as per agenda
material), highlighting the access, and the parking; and noted that Public Works staff
has agreed (in response to the applicant's request) to delete Condition No. 39 (regarding
improvements to Ridge Park Drive).
A:PlanComrrv'minuteslO62602
4
For Chairman Chiniaeff, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks clarified that the
rationale for agreeing to delete Condition No. 39 (regarding improvements to Ridge Park
Drive) was due to the improvements already being completed.
Mr. Kent Lucas, the applicant noted agreement with the Conditions of Approval with the
deletion of Condition No. 39 (regarding improvements to Ridge Park Drive).
In response to Commissioner Olhasso's queries, the Planning Commission relayed no
opposition to the proposed brown-toned color application.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation, subject to Condition No. 39 (regarding improvements to Ridge
Park Drive) being deleted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mathewson and
voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was
absent.
For informational purposes, Deputy Director of Public Works Parks relayed that originally
a seven-story glass tower with a three- or four-story parking garage had been proposed
at this site.
7 Planninq Application No. 01-0648 (Development Plan) Thomas Thornslev
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 01-0648
(Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations;
7.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-019
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 01-0648, DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT, ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO,
THREE-STORY BUILDINGS CONSISTING OF 102
DWELLING UNITS AS AN EXPANSION TO THE
FOUNTAINS AT TEMECULA SENIOR APARTMENT
COMMUNITY ON A 3.4 ACRE SITE KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 920-090-006.
By way of overhead maps, Associate Planner Thornsley presented the project plan (as
per the staff report); relayed that staff had received one letter in opposition to the project
from a resident of Alaska who had previously resided in Temecula, and read the letter
into the record, which outlined Ms. June Tull's concern regarding the density, the height
of the apartment buildings, and traffic; and with respect to the conditions, advised that
the Public Works conditions have been modified, specifically Condition Nos. 48-50 (as
read into the record and specified in the motion; see page 6.)
R:PJanComm'minuteslO62602
5
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's queries, Associate Planner Thornsley noted that the
complex was gated, and that the access point to the creek trail would be a controlled
access.
Mr. Henry Wang, representing the applicant, noted the applicant's excitement regarding
the opportunity to build additional apartments in this area, advising that the units were
eighty percent (80%) leased; with respect to the trails, relayed that the applicant would
be pleased if there could be a trail access point to this particular project; noted that with
respect to Condition Nos. 90 and 92 (regarding ADA access), that per discussions with
Deputy Building Official Harold the Building Department was agreeable to the applicant
installing an easement across Phase I for access; requested that the conditions be
modified to state as acceptable to the Chief Building Officiat, and for Commissioner
Telesio, advised that City staff was working with Riverside County Flood Control and
Conservation District (RCFCCD) regarding the trail access point, Chairman Chiniaeff
clarifying that access to the trails would be subject to RCFCCD's approval, Development
Services Administrator McCarthy specifying that this access point would be restricted
from public use, confirming that staff would work with RCFCCD regarding this matter.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation, subject to the following revisions:
- Modify
. That Condition No. 48a. state the following: Improve Winchester Road (Urban
Arterial Highway Standards - 134 R/W) along this project's frontage to
include installation of streetlights, drainage facilities, utilities (including buy
not limited to water and sewer), if applicable.
. That under Condition No. 49, subsections a - d state the following:
o a. Street improvements, which may include, but not be limited to
streetlights.
o b. Storm drain facilities, if applicable.
o c. Sewer and domestic water systems, if applicable.
o d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines, if applicable.
. That Condition No. 50 (regarding bus bays) be deleted.
. That Condition Nos. 90 and 92 (regarding ADA access) have the phase as
acceptable by the Chief Building Official added.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
R:PlanComm'rrinuleslO62602
6
8 Planninq Application No. 02-0148 (Development Plan) - Thomas Thornslev
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0148
(Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations;
8.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 02-0148 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE
STORY OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 7,986 SQUARE
FEET ON .988 ACRES WITHIN THE OVERLAND
CORPORATE CENTER, LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND
MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL
NO. 921-090-071.
Via overhead site plans, Associate Planner Thornsley provided a brief overview of the
project plan (of record), advising that the four Temecula Community Services
Department conditions were inadvertently omitted from the agenda material, and read
these conditions into the record (as reflected in the motion; see page 8); for
Commissioner Mathewson, specified the location of the parking area, advising that
approximately ninety percent (90%) of the parking would be installed with the
construction of the first four buildings, relaying that staff parking would be located
underground; and specified the proposed pedestrian path, confirming that staff could
discuss with the applicant relocating the pedestrian pathway.
Mr. Robert Christoff, the applicant, relayed a willingness to work with staff regarding
relocating the pedestrian access; provided a sample of the metal panels proposed on
the building; for Chairman Chiniaeff, noted that although the material was very durable,
the panels could be easily removed and replaced, if needed in the future; for
Commissioner Mathewson, noted that since this would be the corporate office the
building would be maintained with high standards (i.e., the glass and the buildings
washed on a regular basis); specified the area where the applicant was proposing to
place a decomposed granite (DG) base material due to the concern of having adequate
space (without landscaping) in order that the numerous windows could be easily washed
and additionally to avoid water residue on the windows which was oftentimes caused by
proximate landscaping irrigation.
Commissioner Olhasso relayed that she was pleased to have this particular project in
the City of Temecula, Commissioner Telesio noting that this proposal conformed to the
Planning Commission's desire to raise the bar with respect to design standards.
R:PlanCorrm'minuteslO62602
7
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation, subject to the following Temecula Community Services District
conditions (which were inadvertently omitted from the staff report material):
Add-
o
All perimeter landscaping and parkways shall be maintained by the property
owner or private maintenance association.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for
disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul
construction debris.
The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the
trash enclosure area.
Any damage to the existing Class II bike lanes on Margarita Road as a result
of construction shall be repaired or replaced, as determined by the Public
Works Department.
o
o
o
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Olhasso and voice vote reflected approval
with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
9 Planninq Application No. 02-0120 (Development Plan) - Rolfe Preisendanz
9.1 Adopt a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. 02-0120
(Development Plan) based on the Determination of Consistency with a project
for which an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was previously certified
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations;
9.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 02-021
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OFTEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. 02-0120 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND
ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO MEDICAL OFFICE
BUILDINGS ON 1.5 ACRES WITH BUILDING "A"
HAVING 3,500 SQUARE FEET AND BUILDING "B"
HAVING 11,100 SQUARE FEET, TOTALING 14,600
SQUARE FEET, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND NORTH
GENERAL KEARNY ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. APN 921-810-0
Assistant Planner Preisendanz provided a brief overview of the project plan (per agenda
material), highlighting the project location, the buildings' location on the site, the phasing
of the project, the parking at the rear of the site, the enhanced architectural features, and
the LDZ along Margarita Road.
R:PlanCorrvnfmlnuteslO62602
8
Mr. Edward Anderson, the applicant, thanked staff for their diligent efforts regarding the
project; noted that the buildings had been pre-sold, ergo the doctors already determined
for this medical building: and relayed that there were no objections to the Conditions of
Approval.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to close the public hearing; and to approve
staff's recommendation. The motion was seconded by Chairman Chiniaeff and voice
vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
For informational purposes, Chairman Chiniaeff noted how quickly excellent projects can
sail through the approval process.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
A. In light of previous Commission discussions, Commissioner Olhasso advised that
she had information regarding a recommended marketing specialist who could
address retail issues with the Planning Commission.
B. For the record, Commissioner Olhasso noted that she was not pleased with palm
trees being included in proposed projects.
C. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she has
been having on-going discussions with a developer regarding the potential to
construct multi-housing units in the shopping centers where market needs
needed to be addressed. In response, Commissioner Olhasso clarified that it was
her desire to have senior housing complexes developed in these locations,
requesting that Director of Planning Ubnoske keep the Planning Commission
updated regarding this issue.
D. In response to Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske provided
additional information regarding the blight at the furniture use adjacent to the
freeway, advising that the Planning Commissioners could contact Code
Enforcement when there were issues needing to be addressed, noting that she
would investigate as to whether Code Enforcement had pagers.
E. Commissioner Telesio noted that there would be an upcoming Subcommittee
meeting regarding the Villages of Old Town Project.
F. Commissioner Mathewson commented on the great product presented at
tonight's Planning Commission meeting, commending staff and the applicants.
In response, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed gratitude, noting staff's efforts
with the applicants; and additionally noted that Senior Planner Hazen had
relayed to the staff, that if there was no one from the public present for a hearing
item, it would not be necessary for staff to provide the Planning Commission with
a detailed report of the project plan since the Planning Commissioners reviewed
this data prior to the hearing.
G. Chairman Chiniaeff congratulated Commissioner Mathewson on his recent re-
appointment to the Planning Commission.
A: PlanComm'lT'IinuteslO62602
9
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:03 P.M. Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the Joint City
Council/Plannina Commission Workshop to be held on Wednesday. Julv 17. 2002
at 6:00 P.M., the next reaular meetina to be held on Wednesday. Julv 31. 2002 at
6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis W. Chiniaeff,
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske,
Director of Planning
R:PlanComrrVminuteslO62602
10
ITEM #4
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
DATE: July 31,2002
SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for June 2002
Date Case No. Proposal Applicant Action
June 6, 2002 PA02-0139 Co-location of wireless antennas on an 02 Wireless Approved
existing approved monopine (PA01-0196).
A new Verizon 11'6"x20'x10' radio
equipment shelter to match the approved
Nextel radio equipment shelter. A new
masonry wall with wrought iron fence on
top to match approved Nextel project.
June 13, 2002 PA02-0075 A Tentative Parcel Map (30504) to Del Sol Approved
subdivide 11.98-acres of land into four Investments
commercial parcels located at the
Commercial Center known as Villages @
Paseo Del Sol.
June 20, 2002 PA02-0109 Establish a church facility within a 2,724 Nu-Way Approved
square foot portion of an existing building. Ministries
June 20, 2002 PA02-0155 Minor Conditional Use Permit application to Linfield Approved
make street improvements and the Christian
relocation of the school's access on Paula School
Road onsite improvements for parking,
circulation, and play/ball fields.
June 27, 2002 P A01-0553 Request to subdivide approximately 81.3- Lowry & Continued
acres of undeveloped land into 14 Associates to July 25,
retail/commercial lots totaling 13.35-acres 2002
and three remainder parcels.
Attachments:
1. Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
R:\DIRHEAR\MEMO\2002\June 2002.memo.doc
R:\DIRHEAR\MEM0\2002\June 2002.memo.doc
ATTACHMENT NO.1
ACTION AGENDAS
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 6, 2002 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Requestto Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item NO.1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Planning Application PA02-0139
02 Wireless
East of Interstate 15 and west of Ynez Road on the south side of
Santiago Road.
Co-location of wireless antennas on an existing approved mono-pine
(PA01-0196). A new Verizon Wireless 11 '6" x 20'0" x 10'0" radio
equipment shelter to match the approved Nextel radio equipment
shelter. A new masonry wall with wrought iron fence on top to match
the approved Nextel project.
Staff has deemed the project categorically exempt from CEQA per
Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities)
Rolfe Preisendanz
APPROVED
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
R:\DIRHEARlAgendas\2002\06.(J6.(J2 ACTION AGENDA.doc
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 13, 2002 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Requestto Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No.1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
PA02-0075 (Tentative Parcel Map Number 30504).
Del Sol Investments.
Located on the northwest corner of Meadows Parkway and Highway
79 South.
A Tentative Parcel Map (30504) to subdivide 11.98 acres of land into
four commercial parcels located at the Commercial Center known as
Villages @ Paseo Del Sol (959-100-064 & 959-100-065); Submitted
by Del Sol Investments.
Determination of Consistency with a project for which an
Environmental Impact Report was previously adopted (Sec. 15162 -
Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations).
Rick Rush, Project Planner II
Mayra De La Torre, Assistant Engineer
APPROVED
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
Case Engineer:
ACTION:
R,IDIRHEARIAgendasI2002\06-13-02 ACfION AGENDA. doc
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 20, 2002 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Requestto Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No.1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
PA02-0109 (Minor Conditional Use Permit)
Nu-Way Christian Ministries
27576 Commerce Center Drive (Jefferson Court Shopping Center,
Units 111 & 112) APN #'s 921-400-062 & 064
To establish a church facility within a 2,724 square foot portion of an
existing building.
This project is exempt from CEQA review due to Class 32
Categorical Exemption 15332 (In-fill Development Project)
Matthew Harris
APPROVED
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
Item No.2:
Case No:
Case Name:
Applicant:
Representative:
PA02-0155
Linfield Christian School Site Improvements
Linfield Christian School, Karen Raftery,
31950 Pauba Rd., Temecula, CA 92592
Sierra Consulting, Deanna Elliano
22359 Whirlaway Ct., Canyon Lake, CA 92587
A Minor Conditional Use Permit Application to make street
improvements and the relocation of the school's access on Paula
Road and onsite improvements for parking, circulation, and play/ball
fields.
31950 Pauba Road located on the north side of Pauba Road west of
Margarita Road (behind Temecula Valley High School).
Proposal:
Location:
R:\DIRHEARIAgendas\2002106-20-Q2 ACTION AGENDA. doc
Environmental Action:
Assessor's Parcel Number:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
Exempt under CEQA Sec's. 15301, 15303, 15304, 15311, and 15314
955-020-002
Thomas K. Thornsley
APPROVED
R,\DIRHEAR\Agendas\2002\06-20-Q2 ACTION AGENDA.doc
2
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 27, 2002 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Senior Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address to the Planning
Manager on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Senior Planner about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Senior
Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Senior Planner
before that item is heard. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
Item No.1:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Proposal:
Planning Application PA01-0553 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 30180)
Lowry & Associates
Southeast & southwest corners of State Highway 79 South and Pala
Road (APN's 961-010-001, 002, 003, 004 & 005).
A request to subdivide approximately 81.3 acres of undeveloped land
into 14 retaiVcommercial lots totaling 13.35 acres and three
remainder parcels.
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program
per the California Environmental Quality Act.
Matthew Harris
CONTINUED TO JULY 25, 2002
Environmental Action:
Case Planner:
ACTION:
R:\DIRHEARlAgendas\2002\06-27-02 ACTION AGENDA.doc
ITEM #5
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
June 5. 2002
Planning Application No. 00-0507
(Development Plan)
Hampton Inn Suites
Prepared By: Michael McCoy, Project Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission continue Planning
Application No. OO.{)507 for redesign.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Dinesh Patel, 916 Erie Street Oakland, CA 94610.
PROPOSAL: Design and construction of a 42,000 square foot 70-room, 4-
story hotel building on a 1.35-acre vacant parcel.
LOCATION: Approximately 200-feet east of Jefferson Avenue and
approximately 200-feet north of Winchester Road to the
. adjacent south of the Comfort Inn motel (APN 910-282-007).
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: HTC (Highwayrrourist Commercial)
EXISTING ZONING: HTC (Hlghwayrrourist Commercial)
SURROUNDING ZONING:
North:
South:
East
West:
HT (Highwayrrourist Commercial)
HT (Highwayrrourist Commercial)
HT (Highwayrrourist Commercial)
HT (Highwayrrourist Commercial)
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Hotel
Vacant
Freeway
Commercial Shopping Center
PROJECT STATISTICS
Total Lot Area:
Total Building Area:
Building Footprint:
Landscape Area:
Parking Required:
58,925 square feet
42,000 square feet
11,400 square feet
12,750 square feet
(1.35 gross acres)
.71 FAR
19%
20% net coverage
74 spaces, plus 3 motorcycle & 4 bicycle spaces
R:\D P\2000'00-0507 Hampton Inn SulteslRevised PC STF REP rocommendlng Redesign w-o COA'..doc
Parking Provided:
77 spaces, including 4 handicap, plus 5 motorcycle and 4
bicycle spaces
Building Height:
BACKGROUND
50-feet maximum (4-s10ry)
The proposed project was originally submitted in May 2000 as a Pre-Application Review. During
review of the Pre-Application. staff expressed concem about the proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
exceeding the target FAR of .30 and requested that the FAR be brought into compliance with the
Development Code standards. On October fO, 2000, Larry Markham, the project representative,
sent a letter to staff (reference attached letter Exhibit L) acknowledging that he advised the applicant
that a landscape plan exceeding the minimum code requirements would be required in order to
obtain staff support of the increased FAR. In this letter. Mr. Markham indicated that the proposed
plan should provide an extensive number of mature specimen box size trees with high quality shrubs
and groundcover to meet this FAR approval criterion.
A Development Plan application was submitted on December 11, 2000 and the plans were largely
unchanged from the pre-application plan exhibits. A Development Review Committee (DRC)
meeting was held on January 11, 2001. Between the DRC meeting date and the application
completeness date of March 2002, the applicant being out of the country delayed the processing of
the application. and several iterations of plans were reviewed, but could not be deemed complete.
Plans were resubmitted in March 2001 that addressed some but not all of the application
completeness and design review comments. The application was ultimately deemed complete for
public hearing scheduling in March 2002. The applicant then requested that staff postpone the
public hearing date until June 5" due to scheduling conflicts.
The plans being submitted for Planning Commission review do not address staff's primary concems
of FAR increase, landscaping. building architecture, and pedestrian accessibility. However, the
applicant has requested that the plans be forwarded to public hearing as submitted.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed four-story 70-room hotel building will be centered within the triangular shaped 1.35-
acre lot located in the rear.of the Rancho Temecula Plaza commercial center, adjacent and south of
the existing three-story Comfort Inn motel. The parcel is to the adjacent west of the Winchester
Road 1-15 off-ramp. Access to the site will be provided by three 24-foot wide driveways, two at each
front corner and one in the center of the parcel. Pedestrian access is provided by a 4-foot wide
striped pathway for ADA and pedestrian access, connecting from Jefferson Avenue and the
adjacent commercial center into the project site will be required. The pedestrian access pathway
shown on the plan is not approved by the Building and Safety Department for ADA access
compliance. The parking lot provides 77 vehicle-parking stalls distributed on each side of the
buildin9. Two 1 O-foot x 25-foot loading spaces are located in front of the concrete masonry trash
enclosure at the northeast comer of the properly.
Landscaping will be provided with planters adjacent to all sides of the building and around the
perimeter of the project site. The building specific and foundation landscaping contains a variety of
24-inch and 36-inch box trees and f -gallon and 5-gallon shrubs around the building perimeter.
Landscape coverage for the project site is listed at a total of 20 percent net, which excludes a 2-foOt
parking lot landscape overhang into the planters fronting the building.
R:\P PI2OO0\lXHl507 Hampton Inn SUn..\Ravlsed PC STF REP recommending Redesig. w-o COA'..doc
~
The building architecture is a contemporary raised vertical style that maximizes its footprint on the
lot. The main hotel lobby entrance is facing west, directly in line with the center driveway off
Jefferson Avenue. The front center section of the building will be the only visible part of the building
from Jefferson Avenue. The front entrance is highlighted by a 20-foot high by 34-foot wide cornice-
capped porte-cochere extending outward from the lobby entrance. A secondary entrance is
provided on the east side (rear) of the building, accented with a smaller porte-cochere structure as
requested by Staff. The west (front) wall plane of the building is broken up by four vertical relief
elements that project from the wall surfaoe, from 1-14 feet to 5-U. feet. The building's east side wall
plane is also broken up by three similar vertical relief elements, ranging from 3 u. feet to 7 }2 feet
deep. The two end sections of the building are framed by 2-foot deep vertical insets with a hallway
window on each floor to break up the wall plane and provide natural light in the building corridors.
The comice capped vertical elements vary the parapet roofline to provide a varied building height.
Metal louver air conditioning vent oovers painted to matoh the building wali colors will be installed
below the guest room windows. The guest room windows are inset within the openings of the wall
relief elements. The building colors are a combination of tan, brown, and white stucco. Tan colored
canvas awnings that match the tan eils building base will accent the guest room windows.
The Development Code specifies a target Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of .30 for the Highway/Tourist
Commercial (HT) zoning district. This project is requesting an FAR of .71, exceeding the target FAR
by 0.41. Development Code Section 17.08.050 requires that one of the following three criteria must
be met to justify an increase over the target FAR.
1. The project includes use(s), which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to the city
with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the community; or
2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscaping design amenities, which
reflect an attractive image and character to the city; or
3. The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond those
required mitigation impact measures.
ANALYSIS
The key issues of concem with this application are the increased Floor Area Ratio; the proposed
landscape design; the building architecture; and the pedestrian and disabled access to the hotel
building from the west side parking lot and the adjacent commercial properties.
Floor Area Ratio
The proposed project exceeds the target FAR by.41. The target floor area ratio for the Highway
Tourist (HT) Zone is .30. The Development Code offers incentives to increase the target FAR if the
applicant can meet at least one of the FAR increase criteria in Section 17.08.050 of the
Development Code. Staff cannot make the findings for approval for the proposed FAR increase.
Since the Pre-Application review of the proposed project, Staff has had concems regarding the FAR
increase based on the approval criteria. From the findings of Table 1 below, it is evident that the
proposed project has a higher FAR than any of the other hotel projects in the City. Moreover, the
proposed FAR will result in a corresponding reduction of landscape coverage for the site.
R:\D P\2OOO\OO-05Q7 Hampton Inn SuU..\Revised PC STF REP recomm.ndlng R_.lgn woo COA'..doc
3
Table 1
FAR Number of Guest Lot Size (Acres)
Rooms
Embassy Suites .12 176 6.85
Temecula Valley Inn .38 90 2.61
, Best Western Country Inn .46 61 1.45
Comfort Inn .50 60 1.08
,
i Extended Stay America .57 . 106 1.86
I
Proposed Hampton Inn .71 70 1.35
Staff recommends that the landscaping be enhanced for the site, as the architectural design alone,
does not warrant an FAR increase as required by the Development Code criteria for approval. In
order to achieve parity with the recently approved Extended Stay America hotel, the Floor Area Ratio
would have to be reduced by 8,481-square feet, with a smaller building footprint to allow for
additional landscape coverage.
landscaping
The project proposes to landscape 11,822-sq. feet or 20% of the site, which meets. the minimum
requirement for the HT (Highway Tourist) zone. The City's landscape consultant has given approval
of the conceptual plan based on minimum standards per the Development Code. However, staff
has emphasized to the applicant the importance of substantially exceeding the minimum landscape
coverage requirements and creating a visual statement with the landscape plan, in order to meet
one criteria for approval of an FAR increase. Increasing the landscape coverage and enhancing the
landscape plan to meet this criterion will require a reduction of the building footprint and a revised
site design.
Staff has concems about the view of the east side of the property from the 1-15 off-ramp, since the
proposed trees and shrubs do not provide a significant tree buffer behind the existing Eucalyptus
trees within the CalTrans right-of-way slope area. Staff is hesitant to consider the Eucalyptus trees
as a long-term buffer(i.e. tree health) and believes thatthe proposed on-site landscaping should be
able to "stand alone" and should be substantially improved by making the following revisions to the
conceptual landscape plan:
1. Widen the east perimeter landscape planter to allow staggered tree locations and
accommodate larger specimen trees to better screen the property from the 1-15 off-ramp.
2. Enlarging the 36-inch box Deodar Cedar trees to 48-inch box size specimen trees.
3. Enlarging the 24.inch box Fem Pine and Red Crepe Myrtle trees to 36-inch box size.
4. Enlarging the 15-gallon Chinese Pistache trees to 24-inch box size.
5. Adding additional taller growing evergreen trees within the perimeter landscape planters and
against each side of the building.
6. Enlarging all 5-gallon shrubs to 15-gallon size, particularly along the east and north
perimeter planters to provide a better landscape buffer along adjacent property lines.
R:\D P\2OOO'OO-OS07 Hampton Inn Sultee\Revlsed PC STF REP recommending Redeslgn.w-o COA's.doc
4
7. Clustering 4S-inch and 36-inch box trees within wider sections of perimeter planters and
planters within the building envelop.
B. Create a landscaped entry statement at the building's west facing frontage near the porte-
cochere with a decorative raised flowering planter or water fountain with a shaded seating
area. An alternative could be to provide a water fountain and paved seating/gathering area
fronting the building's south elevation to further enhance the exterior aesthetics and help
mitigate some of the vehicle noise pollution from the freeway off-ramp to the adjacent east.
Building Architecture
The Development Code Commercial Performance Standards recommend that large buildings be
designed to avoid excessive bulk and mass through exterior offsets and wall relief, stepping back
the building's upper stories, and varying the roof heights. Although the proposed building design
provides some vertical offsetting and roof height variation, it gives the appearance of considerable
bulk and vertical wall mass through its vertical design. The building windows appear flat against the
wall surface and don't give a recessed effect to help break up the wall plane. In addition, the north
and south elevations appear inconsistent with the articulation of the west and east elevations and
appear flat and unarticulated with a blank wall view of nearty 35-feet. Staff has previously requested
that the applicant make some exterior design enhancements, but the applicant has chosen to
maintain the proposed design other than a few minor changes. Staff believes that the requested
building design enhancements are important in justifying its support for an FAR increase and in
achieving the objectives of the Commercial Performance Design Standards for architectural quality.
Staff has also recommended to the applicant that the color palette be revised to accentuate the
primary relief column sections on all sides with complementary accent colors to give more definition
to these relief sections. Staff also expressed concern to the applicant about the horizontally scored
stucco base around the building. Staff has recommended that the elevations be revised to provide a
slate tile, flagstone, or stone veneer element around the building's base and up a portion of the
vertical columns to visually break up the flat waD planes and create more four-sided architectural
interest.
One of staff's key concerns regarding the building design is the visual appearance of the exterior air
conditioning vent covers about 4-ft. wide and 2-ft. high that will extend across the base of each
window frame of the guest rooms. Chapter Three of the Commercial Design Guidelines for hotels
and motels requires that air conditioning units should not be visible from public streets. The alc vent
covers would potentially be visible from Jefferson Avenue, Winchester Road, and from the 1-15 off-
ramp, and do not appear flush or screened from view. Staff has requested that an altemative
design be provided that would not be noticeable on the building exterior. Internalizing the ventilation
system would be the preferable design option to completely eliminate the exterior alc vent covers,
but the applicant has stated that this option is not feasible due to the building's structural design. An
alternative option could be to reduce the vent cover length and width and recess them further into
the wall surface. A third option might be to provide a view obscuring decorative false wrought iron
balcony in front of the vent cover surface area to mitigate its potentially negative vlsuallmpact. The
applicant has indicated that the vent covers will be painted to blend in with the wall colors, but
experience has shown that matching paint does not effectively mask the appearance of this type of
louvered vent cover.
The applicant has made some design improvements in the architecture and landscape design at
staff's request since the first plan submittal. For example, the smaller porte-cochere at the rear
entrance was added when staff requested that this entrance be enhanced as viewed from the 1-15
Winchester Road off-ramp. A 200-sq. ft. enclosed outdoor patio area was also added to the east
R:\D P\2OOO\OO-0507 Hampton Inn Su~es\Revlsed pc STF REP recommending Redesign woo COA'..doc
5
rear elevation at staff's request. The applicant has also revised the conceptual landscape plan to
provide some additional shade trees and taller growing shade trees within the parking lot and
adjacent to the building within the landscaped planters. Overall however, the building design does
not fully comply with the City's Design Guidelines, nor justify the FAR increase.
Pedestrian Access and Circulation
Staff has expressed concem to the applicant that the west side parking row does not have an
interior concrete walking path for pedestrian access to the main lobby entrance, but forces visltors
and guests to walk through the parking lot until arriving at the concrete sidewalk past the parklng
row near the lobby entrance. The Commercial Design Guidelines Circulation policies require
separate vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems to be provided If possible. Staff believes that
a sidewalk should be provided on the inside of this parking row to the concrete walkway that
accesses the main entrance. In addition, the Deputy Building Official has requested that the
applicant redesign the pedestrian access path of travel from the Jefferson Avenue public right-of-
way through the commercial center to the main entrance. They have requested that the site plan
show a separate path from traffic with either a curb and rail, truncated domes, or to relocate the
access path out of the 24-foot wide drive aisle that parallels the project's west side frontage. The
Deputy Building Official has previously met with the applicant at the project site to discuss the
compliance problems of the proposed design. However, the applicant has not responded with a
revised access path design that meets the Building and Safety Department requirements to issue
conditions of approval.
The City Traffic Engineer has stated that a traffic study is not required for this size and type of
project, because the use is consistent with General Plan EIR land use assumptions; has no direct
frontage on Jefferson Avenue; and a less than significant peak hour traffic will be generated. He
added that the project Is not large enough to require any road improvements, such as road widening
or intersection modification.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has reviewed the project for compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. Based
upon staffs review, the proposed project is eligible for a CEQA exemption (Class 32-ln Fill Projects)
pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the following reasons:
. The site is 1.35 acres, which is less than the 5 acres required.
. The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
. The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
. The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
. The Hampton Inn Suites hotel building is consistent with the zoning and general plan
designations for the site.
EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
The proposed project is consistent with the HighwayfTourist Commercial (HTC) General Plan land
use designation goals and objectives and with the HighwayfTourist Commercial (HT) zoning district
development standards as a permitted use.
R:\D P\2OOO\o().()S07 Hampton Inn SuilesIRevlsed PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA'..doc
6
"
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
Staff has summarized the primary issues of concem on this proposed project, such as the FAR
increase, landscape design, architecture design, and pedestrian and disabled accessibility. Mostof
these issues center on the primary issue of supporting the requested FAR increase to satisfy one of
the criteria for approving a target FAR increase pursuanlto Section 17.08.050 of the Development
Code. With the plans as submitted, staff cannot make the findings for approval and recommends
that the application be continued for design revisions.
1.
Attachments - Blue Page 8
Colored Elevation Plan reduction
Proposed Project Statement of Operations
FAR Target Exceed<U1ce Letter dated 5-30-02
Project Representative letter to staff October 10, 2000
Rancho California Water District Letter dated January 3, 2001
County Department of Environmental Health Letter dated January 2, 2001
Colors and Materials Sample Board reduction
Exhibits - Blue Page 9
"
2.
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan Land Use Map
D. Site Plan
E. Elevation Plans E-1 and E-2
F. Conceptual Landscape Plan
"
"
R:\o P\2000l00-0507 Hampton Inn SuUesIRevlsed PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA's.doc
7
ATTACHMENT DOCUMENTS NO.1
I
I
I
I
.,
R:\D P\2OOO\Of).Q507 Hampton Inn SulteslRevlsod PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA'..doc
8
559/439-2222
559/439-2296 FAX
LEE GAGE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
.7636 N.INGRAM.. l?UITE 107
FRESNO, CAUFORNIA 93711-6200
architecture
engineering
planning
September6, 2000
Re: Hampton Inri
4 Story I 73 Room Hotel
JeffersonAve. .' .' . .
APN: 910-282~001-1
.'
. .
. O~E~TIONAL STATEM~N!.'
. '.~
. .,'
.'
'. '."
'. .
. A 4 story, 739uestroom!ibtelbl!i1difl9, ,total of 41.1 00 Sq. Ff.. with related. on-site
parking. The proje'ctwill include interior pool, spa, and other standard hotel
, . '" . ,
amenities. '. ". . . .'
The nomiar business hours will be 24 hOurs per day, '7{iaysper weel<.
Maximum, number of employees alone time is 5.
83 parking stalls required... . .
No hazardous materials will be utilized. In this project. .
. . .,. . . : . " '.' .
,.
\
'.
\
temecula.op1
M -lVICJi
u ~ @ ~ 0 w ~m
MAY 3 0 2G02 /J!J
MI>JWlAM OOIElOPMENT MA/lO,IlEMENT GROUP, INC.
May 30, 2002
Chairperson Dennis Chiniaeff .
City ofTemecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
By
Subject:
P A 00-0507
FAR Target Exceedance
Justification
Patel #1037
Dear Chair Chiniaeff,
Initially let me state that all of the hoteVmotel projects approved by the City ofTemecula
after the adoption of the Development Code have required a Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
target exceedance, with the only exception being the Temecula Creek Inn, which is a part
of a larger golf course project.
The Development Code did not adequately address or anticipate two land uses with
regard to FAR, hotels/motels and mini-storage facilities. Those land uses are inherently a
higher FAR by their design nature and are not economically viable at the target FAR.
This particular project is on an infill parcel that was created before Cityhood and before
the Development Code adoption. This parcel is bounded by reciprocal ingress/egress
easements, with a single point of access and with an extremely irregular geometric shape.
The requested FAR is 0.71, which is within the range of 0.30 to 1.00. The City Engineer
has not expressed any concern relative to traffic or utilities.
The applicant is required to meet at least one of the following criteria (see attached).
1.
The hotel project will generate Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) -8%)
which the City ofTemecula will receive 100%. Additionally, the project
will provide employment and added sales tax to the surrounding
restaurants, service stations and other service businesses.
2.
The applicant has revised the architecture with extensive cornice detailing,
building mass offsets, window awnings and decorative grilles over the
HVAC units. The landscaping provides for 35 of the 50 trees to be 24" or
36" box trees and total shrub planting of891 plants with 525 being 5
gallon size. The applicant feels that this is exceptional quality and meets
the design guidelines and the landscape code 20% requirement.
41635 Enterprise Cirele North, Suite B
Temecula, CA 92590-5614
(909) 296-3466
Fax: (909) 296-3476
www.maJ1<hamdmg.com
3. The applicant had originally proposed the use of a community meeting
room, but based on the most recent Extended Stay America approval, staff
declined. The other examples are not available to this type ofIand use, or
not in a proximity to be able to provide that type of amenities.
Any decreases in the FAR could only be accomplished by reductions in rooms in groups
of2/4/6/8 or 4/8/12/16 for one end, and/or both ends of the building.
The building geometry of width is set by room dimensions and the length by the number
of rooms per floor. The reduction of8 or 16 rooms (i.e., one/two building ends) would
only yield 832 or 1664 SF of additional landscape area with a reduction on FAR from
0.71 to 0.60.
Based on these facts, the applicant requests the Commissioners concurrence on the FAR
request and to provide the applicant with specific guidance relative to the architecture.
cc: D. Patel
L. Gage, Lee Gage & Associates
V. DiDonato, Alhambra Group
.
Commercial/Officellnduslriallncentives . Increases in the Roor Area Ratio. As a part of the
process of reviewing and approving an application for a development plan or conditional
use permit, the approval authority may consider an increase in the maximum allowable
Intensity as indicated In Tables 17.08.040.A and B. The amount of the increased Intensity
shall not exceed the maximum of the density range or floor area ratio stated for the specific
land use designation. The requested increase may not be approved If the city engineer
determines that the increased intensity would create an unmitigatable impact upon traffic
circulation or would overburden any utilities serving the area. To be eUgible for an increase
in the floor area ratio, the applicant must meet at least one of the following criteria.
1. The project includes use(s) which provide outstanding and exceptional benefits to
the city with respect to the employment, fiscal, social and economic needs of the
community. Examples include: the provision of affordable housing that Is easily
accessible to and within close proximity to convenient shopping and employment,
accessiblUty. to mass transit facilitlils, and creative'mixtures of land uses, housing
types and densities.
2. The project provides exceptional architectural and landscape design amenities
which reflect an attractive image and character for the city. Examples include:
. extraordinary architectural design and landscaped entry features (may be within the
public right-of-way),. public trail systems, public plazas or gathering spaces. and
recreational features in excess of what Is required by this code.
3. " The project provides enhanced public facilities that are needed by the city, beyond
those required mitigation impact measures. Examples include: the provision of
community meeting centers, enhanced transportation improvements, police or fire
stations, public recreation facilities, and common parking areas oJ' structures to
serve the community.
B. Entertainment Establishments Provldlng Dancing, Music and Similar Activities.
.. .
-'
.
/
A.
1. Noise levels shall not exceed the standards set forth in the noise element of the
general. plan or the environmental performance standards of this development code
(Section 17.08.070).
2. Dancing, music, and similar entertainment uses shall be limited to between the
hours of six p.m. and two a.m.
3. The city may apply additional requirements or limitations depending on the location,
surrounding uses and other considerations.
C. Arcades. In cOnsideration of a request for an arcade, the following crlteria wiD be considered
and applieation material requested.
1. The planning'commission shaD eonsider, but not be Iimit~ to. the need for adult
supervision, hours of operation, proximity to schools and other community uses,
compatibility with the surrounding neighborh9<Xl and businesses, noise attenuation,
bicycle facilities, and Interior waiting areas.
2. The applicant shall submit with his application, three sets of typed gummed labels,
listing the name and address of all businesses within a shopping center and all
landowners within a three-hundred-foot radius of the shopping center or arcade.
Includ...Amendments as 01 November " 1999
Chaoler 17.08 -13
)
-'.,
)
MDMG, Inc.
Markham Development Management Group, Inc.
October 10,2000
/[0) fE @ fE U f!J fE {fl]
Ul1 OCT 1 2 2000 ~I
By
Denice Thomll$
City ofTemecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92593-9033
Subject:
Pre-Application Comments #00-0011
Patel # 1037
Dear Denice,
Thank you for your review of our revised elevations and site plan addressing the issues
that you and Ms. Ubnoske raised at our meeting.
I have advised the applicant that the staff support of the project, and more specifically the
floor area ratio exceeding the target, will be conditional on the submittal of a landscaping
plan that exceeds the Development Code requirements. This plan shall provide for
extensive use of mature specimen box tree plantings and high quality shrubs and ground
cover that will elicit staff support of the project in total.
ment Management Group, Inc.
cc: D. Patel
L. Gage
D. Ubnoske
41750 Wmchester Road, Suite N . Temecula, California 92590-4898. (909) 296-3466' Fax: (909) 296-3476
.dA~
r)
; 'I \
CuUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
January 2, 200 I
RE: Plot Plan No. P AOO-0507
City of Temecula Planning Department
. P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Dear Michael McCoy:
1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. P AOO-0507 and has no objections.
Sanitary sewer and water services may be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO ANY PLAN CHECK SUBMITI AL for health clearance, the following items are required:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies.
b) Three complete 'sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be
submitted, including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure
compliance with the California Unifonn Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please
contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330).
Martinez, Su
:dr
(909) 955-8980
nmental Health Specialist
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
SUlrld:lrd3b(d.,).doc
?
Local Eaforcemont "seney' P.O. Box 1280, River.iide, CA 92502-1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX (909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Aoor, Riverslde, CA 92501
Lond u.o and W..... EqgineerlDg' P.O. Box 1206, RiveBide. CA 92502-1206 . (909) 9554l98O . FAX (909) 9S5$03 . 4080 Lemon 5ln!e~ 2nd Aoor. Rivetside, CA 92501
-
ATTACHMENT NO.2
EXHIBITS
R:\D P\2OOO'OO-0507 Hampton Inn Sultes\ReYlsed PC STF RcP recommending Redesign WoO COA's.doc
9
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. Oll-0507 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT A
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5, 2002
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\2OOO\Oo-.o507 Hampton Inn Sultes\Revised PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA's.doc
10
CITY OF TEMECULA
ZONING MAP
EXHIBIT C
DESIGNATION - HTC HIGHWAY TOURIST/COMMERCIAL
GENERAL PLAN_
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0507 (Development Plan)
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5, 2002
R:\D P\2OO0'OO-{)S()'T HamplOn Inn SulteslRevised PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA'..doc
11
CITY OF TEMECULA
~ l.r~.: :::
'.. ....
.).
~~c
1.~\~~
~
.=~
~,~_.
:';--~I<'
'-~
~~
. ~
~~
~1)-
%
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0507 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT D
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5. 2002
R:\D P'2OOO'4lO-0507 Hampton Inn Suile.IRevlsed PC STF REP recommenelng Redesign woo COA's.doc
12
PF
-
-...
--
........
........'
;"
,
"""
..-.
-....
-~
-.
:':
.-
~I-."
.
--
........
SITE PLAN
.r
'.. f
. ~'.'
<tl
o
c
i!
....
I
I
!
1m :
~:
.::0
o
::0 b
m
r-
m
<
)>
-i.
o 8
Z ~
(fJ
CITY OF TEMECULA
I J
I
t!P '111 118
II. I Ii. ~
Ii I ji I '"
:: II II I
~ III ~
I 11 I~
.: i III Ii II ~
I' i'
, ..~
. ..
. .
II
I
1 ~l'
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0507 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E-l
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5, 2002
ELEVATIONS
R:\D PI2OOO'DO-0507 Hampton Inn SulteslRevised PC STF REP recommending Redesign w-o COA's.doc
13
CITY OF TEMECULA
~
~
j
~
:z I
g
-I .....
:J: -
am ,} ,
~
.
:0
0
:0 .
m
r-
m
<
)>
-l
0 .
z tl
(fJ
I ~ I
I
11'1 1111l1~
il I pp~
II i In Ii fIl
!: n II ~
~ III .~
I . II I I
11 'Iii
i II I ~ II hi
f i I
'PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0507 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT E-2
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5, 2002
.; I
~ ~
It
~
9~
H
p
~
,
~
ELEVATIONS
R:\D PI2OOO\()().()57 Hampton Inn SuitesIRevl.ed PC STF REP recommending Rede.ign woo COA'..doc
14
a I'll Gl It 00 I
00 It 00
1111 HI HI mill
I" · HI l~ ,PI
I I III II Jill I
I I III I, IIII I
I
I I II II m'l
I .
I I, Ull
, . . .~ .. ~. ~ I
I . , .. .. 1111
, .... i
I . 1=;. "
, II ~l~!!!. ml I
.
- i I 1111 ill
l
i I I II
J 1-
.. " l
J lIIi
I
'" ~
I ,
I
CITY OF TEMECULA
i
I
~ .12 I ..,... ...,B
!II I ~~ ~ 1'_
~1~III:i
i HI i!,illlr,
'I@ n. U~ l!I,
"Il ' .. U,1hl
i ~ II
, ,S .. lJ I II,
~ n I I I
~ I
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0507 (Development Plan)
EXHIBIT F
PLANNING COMMISSION DATE - June 5, 2002
l
.
11
rl
-I
I.
. II
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
R:\D P\2OlJO'DO.OW7 Hamplen Inn SulteslRevised PC STF REP recommendi'1g Redesign w-o COA's.doc
15
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- 060
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PAOO-0507 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN -JEFFERSON AVENUE INN)
TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A THREE STORY, 31,600
SQUARE FOOT HOTEL BUILDING ON A 1.35 ACRE VACANT
PARCEL, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND 200 FEET NORTH OF WINCHESTER
ROAD TO THE SOUTH OF THE COMFORT INN MOTEL, KNOWN
AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 910-282-007.
WHEREAS, Dinesh Patel filed Planning Application No. PAOO-0507 (Development Plan), in
a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PAOO-0507 (Development Plan) was processed
including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission at a regular meeting, considered Planning Application
No. PAOO-0507 (Development Plan) on November 19, 2003, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission recommended approval of Planning Application No. PAOO-0507; subject
to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs - Development Plan and Floor Area Ratio increases The Planning
Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PAOO-0507 hereby makes the following findings
as required by Section 17.05.010.F and by Section 17.08.050 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city because the General Plan
designation for the site is HTC (Highway Tourist Commercial) and a hotel is a permitted land-use
with the Highway Tourist Commercial area. The zoning for the project site is Highway Tourist (HT)
which allows the development of hotels provided a development plan application is submitted and
approved. The project has also been determined exempt from CEQA because it qualifies as an infill
project and is consistent with Section 15332 of CEQA Guidelines.
RIP P\2ooo\Oo-0507 Jefferson Ave InnlReso& CondS..doc
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety and general welfare because the project site is consistent with all applicable City
standards and Ordinances, including parking, circulation, public improvements, and design and the
project will require a building permit subject to the California Building Code standards.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application
No. PAOO-0507 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15332
(In-Fill Development Projects, Class 32). This project is an in-fill development and it meets the
following criteria:
. The site is 1.35 acres, which is less than the 5 acres required.
. The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the area.
. The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
. The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
. The Jefferson Avenue Inn building is being approved pursuant to the zoning and
general plan designations for the site.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves Planning Application No. PAOO-0507 for a Development Plan to build a
31,600 square foot, 56-unit hotel building on a 1.35-acre lot located approximately 200 feet east of
Jefferson Avenue and 200 feet north Winchester Road to the south of the Comfort Inn Motel, known
as Assessors Parcel No. 910-282-007. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission on this 19th day of November 2003.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\D P\2000100-0507 Jefferson Ave InnIReso& Conds..doc
2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2003-060 was duly and regularly adopted by, the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19" day of November 2003, by the
following vote:
AYES:
5
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Matheson,
Olhasso, Telesio
NOES:
o
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSENT:
o
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSTAIN:
o
None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
3
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondS..doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PAOO-0507 (Development Plan)
Jefferson Avenue Inn
Project Description:
The design and construction of 31,600 square foot hotel
building on a 1.35-acre lot located approximately 200 feet east of
Jefferson Avenue, and 200 feet north of Winchester Road known
as Assessors Parcel No. 910-282-007.
DIF Category:
Service Commercial
Assessor Parcel No.:
910-282-007
Approval Date:
November 19, 2003
Expiration Date:
November 19, 2005
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided
under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section
15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the Citys own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
R:\D P\2QOO\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondShdoc
5
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4. In order to avoid being classified as a residence, the maximum occupancy of any unit by any
customer shall not exceed 30 days.
5. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "B"
(Site Plan), approved with Planning Application No. PAOO-0507, or as amended by these
conditions, contained on file with the Planning Department. Additionally, the following
revisions shall be made to the site plan prior to issuance of Building Permit:
a. An eight-foot sound wall shall be shown around the perimeter of the outdoor
swimming pool as shown on Exhibit 1-C of the "Jefferson Avenue Inn Noise Study"
prepared by Urban Crossroads Inc. The design and materials used for the sound
wall shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.
b. Twe 1 Q' x 28' l3arking spacos shall bo addod onsito. Tho spaeos shall bo dosignatod
for roeroational vohielo, tnlel{ aRd tFailer l3arl{iR~ enly. (Deleted by Planning
Commission on November 19, 2003)
6. Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly
upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All building and exterior landscape lighting
shall be a decorative type complimentary to the building. Details and cut-sheets of these
lights shall be submitted to the Planning Department with building construction plans for
review prior to installation.
7. All parking lot lights and other exterior lighting shall be low pressure sodium and shall be
shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check
approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655.
8. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "E" (Building
Elevations) and Exhibit "G" (Color and Material Board), or as amended by these conditions,
contained on file with the Planning Department. All mechanical and roof-mounted
equipment shall be hidden by building elements, designed for screening as an integral part
of the building. When determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet or
alternative facades shall be provided for screening.
9. All roof drainage downspouts shall be internalized and architecturally integrated within the
wall of the structure so as not to be visible from the outside of the building.
a. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape
Plan), or as amended by these conditions. Landscaping installed for the project shall
be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of
Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the
landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or
any successors in interest. .
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondS..doc
6
10. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials, with the colored Elevation Plan Exhibits "E" and with the
Color and Material Board Exhibit "G", or as amended by these conditions, contained on file
with the Planning Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the approved colors
and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material Color
EIFS Base
EIFS Field
EIFS Column & Ornament Bands
Aluminum Storefront Metal
Canvas Awnings
#392 Coconut Shell
#116 Victorian Lace
#102 Brite White
Dark Bronze
Color to Match EIFS Base
11. A separate permit shall be applied and approved prior to construction of any pylon or
freestanding sign on the project site. Additionally, any other signs, including wall signs,
directional signs and hanging signs shall be subject to separate approval of the Planning
Department prior to installation.
12. The canvas awnings over the guest room windows shall be maintained to a like new
appearance at all times. The awnings shall be replaced with a new one to match if it
becomes faded, cracked, weather worn, torn, or visibly damaged in any manner.
13. A reciprocal access easement between the affected parcels within the shopping center shall
be submitted to the Planning Director for review and approval prior to recordation.
14. A cSRtral air ssnditionin!j systSFR shalllle iRSSFI3SFatod ints tAS hotel btlileliR~ senstrlJclisR
drawings. .^.II iRdi'lidtlal hotel rSSFR air cenditioRin!j t1nite shalllls FeFRo\'od. (Deleted by
Planning Commission on November 19, 2003)
15. The hotel building shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the
Planning Director. If it is determined that the building is not being maintained, the Planning
Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to undertake necessary
repairs. The continued maintenance of the building shall be the responsibility of the property
owner or any successors in interest.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
16. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the
Planning Department - Planning Division for their files.
17. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the T emecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
18. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board Exhibit "G" and
of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored architectural elevations to the
Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
R:\D P\2000\OO.0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
7
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
19. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
20. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by Condition No.5 and any other related conditions.
The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following
revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building
permits:
a. All decorative concrete onsite shall have a tan color rather than a natural concrete
color.
b. The eight-foot tall sound wall surrounding the pool area shall be shown on the plan
along with necessary plantings to break-up and soften the wall.
c. Sufficient plantings shall be added on the landscape construction drawings so as to
ensure that the two loadings spaces at the northeast corner of the site are fully
screened from Interstate 15 and the associated off-ramp.
d. All shrubs planted onsite shall have a minimum five-gallon container size.
The plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Trash enclosure and all utility equipment shall be screened with landscaping and
shown on the Construction Landscape Plans.
d. Plantings shall not interfere with traffic sight lines or utility lines.
e. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
f. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
g. An Arborist Assessment Report shall be prepared at the applicants expense to
ascertain the health of the existing slope trees and shrubs within the Galtrans right-
of-way abutting the full length of the eastern property line.
If the Report concludes that the trees and shrubs are unhealthy, the applicant shall
prepare a revised landscaping plan showing enhanced landscaping along the
property line subject to Planning Director review and approval. (Revised by the
Planning Commission on November 19, 2003)
21. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department that meets
the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The
parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as not to adversely impact the
growth potential of the parking lot trees.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondS..doc
8
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
22. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
23. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from
final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have
been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be
released.
24. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be
painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a
contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as
possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
25. A permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or
equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility, shall identify each parking space
reserved for the handicapped. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches and
shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height if 80 inches
from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum
height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall
also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not
less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for
persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense.
Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909 696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
26. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
27. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
28. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondS..doc
9
29. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
30. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
31. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
32. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
33. Disabled access from the existing private access driveway to the main entrance of the
building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access
Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on
plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998)
34. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
35. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
36. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
37. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
38. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
39. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional on plans submitted for plan review.
40. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
41. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
42. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for disabled accessibility.
43. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
44. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
buildino plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
45. Show all building setbacks.
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
10
46. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
47. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
48. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
49. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-
way.
50. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
51. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
52. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
53. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
54. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
55. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
11
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
56. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
57. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
58. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
59. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
60. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
61. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
62. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
R:\D P\2ooolOo-o507 Jefferson Ave InnlReso& Conds..doc
12
63. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
64. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
65. The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object to
the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge and
Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed median on Jefferson
Avenue in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
66. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
67. All public improvements, including the raised landscaped median along Jefferson Avenue,
shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the
satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
68. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
69. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in
force at the time of building, plan submittal.
70. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1625 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 700 GPM for a
total fire flow of 2325 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A)
71. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-
site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and
R:\D P\2000\OO-oS07 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& CondS..doc
13
shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department
access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required.
(CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
72. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
73. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
74. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
75. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
76. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
77. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
78. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
79. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
81. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
R:\D P\2000\OO-0507 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
14
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters andlor
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
82. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
83. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
84. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the Fire Sprinkler Riser Room door. (CFC 902.4)
85. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
Special Conditions
86. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
87. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
88. All perimeter landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property
owner or private maintenance association.
89. The developer shall contact the Citys franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
90. Developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area.
91. The developer, the developer's successors or assignee, shall be responsible for the
landscaping maintenance of the median until such time as maintenance duties are accepted
by the TCSD.
R:\D P\2ooolOo-o507 Jefferson Ave InnIReso& Conds..doc
15
92. Installation of the landscape improvements within the median shall commence pursuant to a
pre-job meeting with the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent and monitored in accordance
with the TCSD inspection process.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
93. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
94. Landscape plans for the proposed raised landscaped median on Jefferson Avenue shall be
reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services.
95. The developer shall enter into an improvement agreement and post securities for the
landscaped median on Jefferson Avenue.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
96. The landscape improvements within the raised landscape median shall be completed to
TCSD standards including the 90-day maintenance period.
OTHER AGENCIES
97. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal letter dated April 15, 2003, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:\D P\2000\OO-OS07 Jefferson Ave Inn\Reso& Conds..doc
16
@
IaDchD
Iat8r
I .
""*"'"'-
Doualu v. KuJbeq
...........
Georco M. Wood.
Sr. Vke Pr.LieDt.
Ralph R n.n,.
Iba D. Horman
c..aIIIlP.Ko
Souu A. Mclntyn
Jdtrey L. Minkler
Olll,.,.,
JobnF.HennIaar
--
PbDlip LPome.
Dirw:torofll'iawlc:e.
............
B.P. "'Bob"1AaaoJuI
Dinct.orol~
.......... C. DeoJy
~",")..........
&U.;..t_..._
Pwry R. """""
"'"""""
, . ')
t
January 3, 2001
Michael McCoy, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO.7 OF PARCEL MAP NO. ~1670
APN 916-282-007
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. P A00-6S07
Dear Mr. McCoy:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore,. would be available upon .completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner.
!flire protection is required, the customer will need to contact 1tCWD for fees and
requirements.
UndaM._
==Admlnlmatift Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
c. ........""""'. Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
Best. Belt. KrIepr (UI'
Gooonl ""-'
If you should have any questions, please contact an E~neering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~e~
Steve Brannon, P.E. ..
Development Engineering. Manager
Ol\SB:al003\FoI2-T6\FCf
Rancho CallComla Water Distriot
421S5WintbeaterRoad' PoAOfI'iceIm9017' Temecu1a.Ca1ilotDia~9017 . (909)296-6900'FAX(909)296-6860
'"
ITEM #6
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
July 31, 2002
Planning Applications No. PA01-0522
(Zone Change)
Planning Application No. 00-0470
(Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan)
Prepared By: Thomas Thornsley, Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission forward these projects to the
City Council with a recommendation for approval:
1. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF
A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE INITIAL STUDY AND
ADOPTION OFTHE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PA01-
0522 AND PAOO-0470, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET
EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001
THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006.
2. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0522, A CHANGE OF ZONE
FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY- 5 (PDO-5), AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AND ADOPTING THE STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS
CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PDO DOCUMENT,
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH
R:IC U P\2ooolOo-o47o Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-o2.doc
1
BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND
CONTINUING EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR
PROPERTY KNOWN AS LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF
TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006."
3. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT, FOR THE OPERATION OF A 146,826 SQUARE FOOT
CHURCH COMPLEX ON A 39-ACRE SITE, INCLUDING A 1,500-
SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT, INTERIM SANCTUARY WITH
ASSEMBLY ROOM AND NURSERY; A 300 SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE
FOOT CHAPEL; A 3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP
CENTER; A 9,695 SQUARE FOOT PRE-SCHOOL; AND THE
PLACEMENT OF SEVENTEEN (17) MODULAR CLASSROOM
BUILDINGS AS TEMPORARY FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480
FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING
EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY
KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10
OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-070-003 THRU -006.
4. ADOPT a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH AND
SCHOOL CAMPUS TO ACCOMMODATE 1,800 STUDENTS ON A
39-ACRE SITE. THE OVERALL PROPOSAL WILL INCLUDE
146,826 SQUARE FEET OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION WHICH
INCLUDES: A 1,500-SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT, INTERIM
SANCTUARY WITH ASSEMBLY ROOM AND NURSERY, A 300-
SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL, A 11,860 SQUARE FOOT
ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING, A 3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE
FOOT WORSHIP CENTER, AND A TWO STORY-FOUR LEVEL
PARKING STRUCTURE (WITH 918 SPACES TOTALING 380,023
SQUARE FEET); AND 136,771 SQUARE FEET OF SCHOOL
FACILITIES FOR FIRST THROUGH TWELFTH GRADE
CONSISTING OF: AN INTERIM MODULAR SCHOOL CAMPUS
R:\C U P\2ooolOo-o47o Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-o2.doc
2
WITH A TOTAL OF 17 MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDINGS,
TWO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BUILDING TOTALING 64,156
SQUARE FEET, A 28,826 SQUARE FOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL, A
17,900 SQUARE FOOT HIGH SCHOOL, A 9,695 SQUARE FOOT
PRESCHOOL, TWO-UNIT FIELD HOUSEl RESIDENCE
BUILDINGS, AND A 16,194 SQUARE FOOT GYMNASIUM; AND A
TWO STORY, 44,406 SQUARE FOOT ADMINISTRATION/OFFICE
BUILDING, LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79
SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD
AND CONTINUING EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET,
FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4,
5,6,7,8,9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-
070-003 THRU -006.
APPLICATION INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Rancho Community Church, 29141 Vallejo Ave., Temecula, CA 92592
PROPOSALS: PA01-0522, a Zone Change to establish a Planned Development Overlay and
modify the land use standards to allow for a mix of uses on 55 acres including a
church, school and office/commercial uses over property located on the north
side of the State Route 79 South, beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith
Road and continuing east for 4,000 feet.
PAOO-0470, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a church and private school
with 146,826 square feet of total religious building area, and 1,800 students and
136,771 square feet of total school building area; and to place seventeen (17)
temporary modular classrooms on a 39-acre site, located on the north side of the
State Route 79 South, beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and
continuing east for 3,000 feet.
PAOO-0470, a Development Plan Development Plan to for the design and
construction of a church and school campus to accommodate 1,800 students on
a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will include 146,826 square feet of religious
institution which includes: a 1,500-seat, 26,927 square foot, interim sanctuary
with assembly room and nursery, a 300-seat, 5,856 square foot chapel, a 11,860
square foot adult education building, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship
center, and a two story-four level parking structure (with a 918 spaces totaling
380,023 square feet); and 136,771 square feet of school facilities for
Kindergarten through twelfth grade classroom facilities consisting of: two interim
modular school campus with a total of 17 modular classroom buildings, two
elementary school building totaling 64,156 square feet, a 28,826 square foot
middle school, a 17,900 square foot high school, a 9,695 square foot preschool,
two-unit field house/ residence buildings, lit athletic fields, and a 16,194 square
foot gymnasium; and a two story, 44,406 square foot administration/office
building; located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet
east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet.
LOCATION: On the north side of State Route 79 South beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah
Smith Road and continuing east for 4,000 feet for property known as Lots 1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-001 thru -006.
R:\C U P\2ooolOo-o47o Rancho Community Church\5taff report PC 7-31-o2.doc
3
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
EXISTING LAND USE:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
PROJECT STATISTICS - PHASE I
PO (Professional Office) with Z-1 overlay
PO (Professional Office)
North: VL (Very Low Density Residential)
South: PDO-4 and LM (Low Medium Density Residential)
East: PO (Professional Office)
West: VL (Very Low Density Residential)
Vacant
North: Single family detached homes
South: Vacant
East: Vacant
West: Single family detached homes
AREA (SF) LOT HEIGHT OF PARKING PARKING SPACED
BUILDING USE COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED
FAMILY LIFE CENTER/INTERIM
SANCTUARY ASSEMBLY ROOM &
NURSERY-SEAT. CAP. 1,500 29,92711.58%\ 29,927 41'.6" 1/3 SEATS 500 500
CHAPEL SEATING CAPACITY 300 5,856 (0.34%) 5,856 38' -6' 1/3 SEATS 100 100
SUBTOTAL PARKING - CHURCH USE: 600 600
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TWO
STORY - OFFICES 11,102 (1.30%) 22,203 31'- 8" 1/300 SF 74 74
PRESCHOOL BUILDINGS 8
CLASSROOMS & 1/2 EMPLOYEES
ADMINISTRATION 9,695 (0.57%\ 9,695 26'.8" + 1/5 CHILDREN 22 22
ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING 11,86010.70%\ 11,860 26' -8' 1/35 SF 339 339
SUBTOTAL PARKING - SCHOOL USE: 1,035 1,035
17 - MODULAR CLASSROOM
BUILDINGS 24,480 (1.36%) 24,480 13' - 6"
TOTALS: 92,920 (5.85%) 104,021
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 1,035
R:\C U P\2000100-D470 Rancho CommunityChurch\5taff report PC 7-31-02.doc
4
PROJECT STATISTICS - PHASE II
AREA (SF) LOT HEIGHT OF PARKING PARKING SPACED
BUILDING USE COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING TWO
STORY - OFFICES 22,203 (1.30%\ 22,203 31' -8" 1/300 SF 148 148
BUILDING #1 - ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL TWO STORY 23,Q83 (1.35%\ 46,256 37'.7.5" 1.5/CLASSROOM 54 54
ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING 11,860 (0.70%\ 11,860 26'.8M 1/35 SF 339 339
2-FIELD HOUSE BUILDINGS-
STORAGE / MAINTENANCE - 2
RESIDENTIAL LOTS 5,000 (0.29%\ 10,000 23' -1' l/UNIT 4 4
SUBTOTAL PARKING - SCHOOL USE: 545 545
2 of 3-STORAGE / MAINTENANCE 4,050 (0.24%\
BUILDINGS 4050 14'-7"
TOTALS: 66,196 13.88%) 94,369
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 545
PROJECT STATISTICS - PHASE III
AREA (SF) LOT HEIGHT OF PARKING PARKING SPACED
BUILDING USE COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED
BUILDING #2 - ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL TWO STORY 8,950 (0.52%\ 17,900 37' - O' 1.5/CLASSROOM 23 23
BUILDING #4 . HIGH SCHOOL 8,950 (0.52%\
TWO STORY 17,900 37' - O' 8/CLASSROOM 120 120
BUILDING #5 - GYMNASIUM 16,194 (0.95%\ 16,194 29' -0. 1/200 SF 81 81
SUBTOTAL PARKING - SCHOOL USE: 224 224
3RD-STORAGE / MAINTENANCE
BUILDINGS 4,050 (0.24%\ 4050 14' -7"
9 - MODULAR CLASSROOM
BUILDINGS 11,440)(0.08%\ -24,480 13'.6"
TOTALS: 38,14412.31%) 31,564
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 224
R:\C U P\2000\OO-0470 Rancho Community Church\Staff report PC 7-31-02.doc
5
PROJECT STATISTICS - PHASE IV
AREA (SF) LOT HEIGHT OF PARKING PARKING SPACED
BUILDING USE COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED
BUILDING #3 - MIDDLE SCHOOL
TWO STORY 14,413 (0.85%) 28,826 37' - 7.5" 1.5/CLASSROOM 30 30
BUILDING #5 - GYMNASIUM 16,194 (0.95%) 16,194 29' -0' 1/200 SF 81 81
TOTALS: 30,607 /1.80%) 45,020 111 111
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 111
PROJECT STATISTICS - PHASE V
AREA (SF) LOT HEIGHT OF PARKING PARKING SPACED
BUILDING USE COVERAGE TOTAL BUILDING ORDINANCE REQUIRED PROPOSED
WORSHIP CENTER ASSEMBLY
ROOM & CHOIR-SEAT. CAP. 3,500 43,727 (3.56%) 43,727 35'.6" 1/3 SEATS 1,167 1,167
PARKING STRUCTURE - TWO
STORY (918 SPACES) 97,426 (5.71%) 380,023 47' - 6M
TOTALS: 141,153/9.27%) 423,750
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: 1,167
BACKGROUND
The applicant submitted a formal application for a Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan (PAOO-
0470) on November 16, 2000. A Development Review Committee meeting was held on December
14, 2000, at which time the applicant was reminded of their need to process a Planned
Development Overlay prior to the processing of any development proposals. On April 27, 2001, the
first draft of the PDO was submitted and the formal application (PA01-0522) was filed October 23,
2001. The third and final set of revised plans for the church and school were submitted May 17,
2002, and all departments completed their reviews. Upon completing the review, the Initial Study
was circulated for public comment on July 1, 2002, and both applications were scheduled for
hearing.
A sub-committee comprised of Mayor Roberts, a Planning Commissioner Chairman Chiniaeff, the
City Manager, and Department Heads was established to assist in the review and discussion of
possibly sensitive issues related to a project of this size. The sub-committee first met with the
applicant in December of 2001 and again in March of 2002. To get a sense of the community's
concerns the City hosted a neighborhood meeting and invited every property owner within a 600-foot
radius. From that meeting staff was provided with some insight into the potential issues.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Zone Chanae/Planned Development Overlav
The City of Temecula's General Plan Land Use Map designates approximately 90 acres of property
on the north side of SR-79 South as Professional Office (PO). The General Plan Land Use Element
designates this property as Specific Plan Area Overlay (Z-1 and Z-2) for 'those portions of the
community, which because of size, location, and special development opportunities require a
coordinated, comprehensive planning approach."
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
6
The applicant proposes to amend the zoning map designation from PO (professional Office) to
PDO-5 (Planned Development Overlay) for a 54-acre site. In addition, a PDO document has been
submitted which contains specific development standards to guide the proposed and future
development of the site.
The document includes detailed development standards for the two planning areas, consisting of a
church/school campus and a professional/commercial center. The development standards in the
PDO are similar to those in the Development Code for Professional Office, with the exception of
maximum building heights. The Code permits a maximum building height of 75 feet in the PO Zone,
however the General Plan Policy for the Z-1 overlay is one or two stories maximum. To achieve
consistency with the General Plan, the PDO proposes a maximum building height of 40 feet and two
stories, and 45 feet for large assembly buildings and parking structures.
Design standards contained in the PDO describe a Spanish-American architecture style as
"characterized by understated elegance and simplicity incorporating the careful use of details to
enhance it attractiveness and function." Within the PDO document are conceptual site layouts
depicting possible future development of the easterly portion of the site area designated for a
professionaVcommercial center. Any future development of the property in this area will be subject
to the City's application review process at the time a development proposal is requested.
Conditional Use Permit
The draft PDO lists "religious institutions with private schools" as requiring a Conditional Use Permit.
In addition, a CUP is required to locate 17 modular classrooms on the site until such time that
permanent structures are constructed. The modular buildings will be used as temporary classrooms
until permanent classrooms are constructed during Phases II through IV. The placement of the
modular units will occur at two locations, one near the eastern entrance to the site and once at the
future site of the worship center.
The church and school campus will encompass 39 acres on the westerly portion of the site. The
campus will have approximately 3000 lineal feet of frontage along Highway 79, and include two
signalized entries and one limited access entry.
The church complex will ultimately have a maximum seating capacity of 3,500 people in the worship
center, 300 people in the chapel, an 11,860 square foot adult education building, and a 44,000
square foot joint administration building.
Development Plan
Using the PDO document as a development guide, the Development Plan application includes the
site layout and design of all structures on the westerly 39-acre portion of the 54-acre site.
The applicant is proposing the design and development of a church and school campus on 39 acres
along the north side of SR-79 South. This project has approximately 3,400 lineal along the highway
and includes two major, signalized entries and one limited access entry. The eastern most access
will be a new street that will align with Avenida de Missiones and the central access drive will align
with the commercial and residential project to the south. On the western end of the property will be
a limited access (right-inlright-out) entry point serving the sports fields and providing alternative
access to the site.
A new public street, Rancho Pueblo Road, will serve as the eastern access to the site, the church
and school campus and the future commercial property. Turning west off of Rancho Pueblo will be
Chapel Lane, a private drive that circulates through the campus and exits onto SR-79 South. Along
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
7
the north side of this drive will be the majority of the buildings making up the church and school
campus. The only structures on the south side will be an office building and the future parking
structu re.
The church and school are somewhat intertwined with a grouping of church facilities in the center
the elementary and daycare building on the east side, and the junior and high school buildings on
the west side. All buildings on this campus are designed as a derivative of Spanish-American
architecture using colonnades (actual or relief) with tile roofs, tower elements at major entries,
square and rectangular recessed windows, split face block wainscot and stucco wall finishes, and
Spanish tile mansard roofs.
Church:
The core of the church facility is made up of the Worship Center, Family Life Center, the Chapel,
and the Adult Education Building all fronting to a common plaza. At the center of the site, set for
development in Phase I, is the Family Life Center: a 27,000 square foot multi-purpose building that
will initially serve as the congregation's sanctuary and meeting hall and as a gymnasium for the
school. This building is rectangular, lying east to west, with a forward projecting and vertical
stepping tower on the south side of the building facing into a plaza.
To the southwest of the Family Life Center will be the 5,800 square foot Chapel with seating for 300.
Architecturally, it is very characteristic of the early California Mission style with the bell tower and
heavy eave overhang of the pitched tile roof. This building will serve as a special facility for smaller
gatherings in a more intimate setting.
An adult education building of 11,860 square feet will be made up of assembly areas, classrooms
and a kitchen. This facility will serve both the church and school operations and is central to the
common plaza serving all the church buildings.
At the intersection of SR-79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road, will be an administration building.
This is a two-story 44,000 square foot building that will be built in two phases. The northern half is
proposed in Phase I with the second half to be completed in Phase II. It will provide administrative
office space for both the church and school operations and can be offered as commercial office
spaces if not entirely utilized by the church and school.
The Worship Center is the largest (43,727 square feet with a 3,500 seating capacity) structure on
the site and is set for development in the final phase. This building utilizes the entire range of
architectural elements found on the Family Life Center and is consistent with the PDO design
standards set for this development area. The development of the Worship Center will increase the
parking needs for the site beyond that which can be provide on the available land.
To provide for the parking a four level, two-story parking structure is proposed. It will cover 97,426
square feet (380,023 square feet total) and measures 365 feet by 270 feet, making it the largest
structure on the site. The tallest elements of the parking structure are the 47-foot high tower
features, over the southwest and the northeast corners, while the bulk of the building will be 34 feet
tall. To minimize the size of the building along the street elevation (south), a portion of the upper
deck is recessed back 20 feet. Planter boxes are used in the mid-section of the south elevation to
accommodate plant material that can cascade from each level and provide some vertical relief and
screening for the upper three levels.
School:
The school facilities will consist of two elementary classroom buildings, a junior high and high school
buildings, a gymnasium, preschool, two field houses, three storage/maintenance buildings, and two
interim modular classrooms campus clusters. At build-out the permanent campus is anticipated to
accommodate 1 ,800 students.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
8
Initial operation of the school is intended to serve the school's current student enrollment of 600 to
700 students, with the assembly of the two modular campus sites made up of 17 modular units and
the construction of a 9,695 square foot preschool. One modular is proposed along the north property
line (Modular Campus A) near the eastern entry to the site at Rancho Pueblo and Chapel Lane. The
other campus (Modular Campus B) is located on the future site of the Worship Center. The
preschool will be a permanent structure and is designed with an internal courVplay area and
maintains the thematic architectural style with the use of two modest tower elements on the
northwest and southwest corners of the building.
All of the other permanent classroom buildings utilize the same architectural styling. The classroom
buildings will be two-story rectangular structures with a large central element capped with a pitched
tile roof and flanked by opposing wings with parapet walls topped with an accenting cornice. Inset
mansard roof features and trellised entries are used to break up the length of these wings. The
primary finish of the exterior walls will be stucco with a three-foot high wainscot at the base and a
pre-cast concrete ledger use as a floor break between the first and second floors. These building will
be constructed in Phase II through Phase IV with the elementary school's Building 1, at 46,256
square feet, with 36 classrooms including a library and administration offices, being the first
permanent classroom building to be constructed.
Other buildings to be constructed in subsequent phases include the elementary school's Building 2
at 17,900 square feet and offering 15 classrooms; the middle school at 28,826 square feet with 20
classrooms, a library, and administration offices; the high school at 17,900 square feet with 15
classrooms; the gymnasium (built in two phases) at 16,194 square feet with assemble rooms,
kitchen, and training room. Additionally, two two-story field houses will be built. Each will be 5,000
square feet with storage and maintenance room, snack bar, and locker rooms downstairs and two
studio style caretaker facilities upstairs.
In conjunction with the construction of the school buildings, several ball fields will be built. On the
east end of the site will be a small baseball and soccer field. The western third of the site will have
two baseball fields, a soccer field, and volleyball courts. The applicant is proposing to light these
fields for evening play and other outdoor events.
Phasina:
This project is intended for development over several years and consist of into five phases. The first
phase of development will see the construction of the Family Life Center/Interim Sanctuary, the
Chapel, pre-school, modular classrooms, the administration building, and the elementary play fields.
Subsequent phases will initiate construction of permanent classroom buildings and other church
facilities. In the final phase of development will be the Worship Center, which will have a 3,500-seat
capacity. Parking needs for this building requires the construction of the four level parking structure.
All the phases of development are separated in the Phasing breakdown provided earlier in this
report. With the development of each phase will come additional site improvements both to
accommodate the needs of the development and/or to meet project mitigation measures. It should
be noted that there might be some deviation in the phased development due to actual space needs
or budgetary constraints.
Parkina:
All the parking lots around the side and rear perimeters of the school campus will serve dual
purposes as hard surface play areas and parking areas for church activities. These areas have
forgone the typical landscape buffering and planter islands installed for shading and screening to
maintain open unobstructed play areas for student activities. However, the parking areas along SR-
79 South have been designed with landscape buffers and planter islands. At the site of the future
parking structure is a parking lot with 343 spaces with perimeter landscape buffering planters but
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc 9
without any internal planter islands. This area will be utilized as a parking area until such time that
the parking structure is necessary.
Landscaoina
Along SR-79 South will be an abundant 36 foot deep landscape buffer to enhance the streetscape
and to serve and a buffer to the church and school. This buffer will include Peppers and London
Plane trees are the dominant tree and a variety of shrubs and grown covers. Internal to the site
landscaping is used around all of the building and in raised planters in the plaza. A single row of
Sweet Bay trees lines the rear of the property as a buffer to the residences. Overall the site has
21.3% landscaping and another 9.4% in patios and plazas utilizing 30.7% of the site without
counting the sports fields.
Sians:
There are a number of signs being proposed along SR-79 South. Identifying the church will be a
single monument sign 7'4" tall and 15' wide located midway between the two signalized intersections
leading into the site. At the west signalize entry will be a 21' tall 12' wide tower sign with reader
board for both Rancho Community Church and School. Proposed on the northwest corner of the
east entry at Rancho Pueblo Road is a 12-foot tall by 12 foot wide multi-tenant sign with 10 inserts
for use by the tenants in the administration building.
Walls:
Along SR-79 South will be a masonry wall between the two signalized entries and a three rail white
fence with chain link insert from the west property line to the west signalized entry. The masonry
wall can be up to six feet in height and will have pilaster breaks at 60-foot intervals providing the
opportunity for wall offsets to break up its long lineal length. Both the wall and fence will be on top of
an earthen berm of up to four feet in height with abundant landscaping to accent, buffer, and aid in
screening the site. Along the rear of the site will be a rail white fence.
ANALYSIS
Environmental Determination
Staff has prepared and circulated an Initial Study and determined that the project could potentially
result in significant environmental impacts, unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of
approval. Based on those findings, staff has determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan will satisfactorily comply with the regulations of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The impacts of primary significance are traffic, air quality,
geology, and hydrology.
Traffic concerns dealt with the need for traffic signals and area. The increase in the A.M. peak trips
generated by a school as compared to professional office uses will result in higher morning traffic
generated by school use. Because schools let out before the heavier afternoon traffic hours there
would be no P.M. traffic conflicts.
It was determined that the overall A.M. peak trip count can be reduced through one of two methods:
alternate access, staggered start times for the three school levels with some consideration for the
use of carpooling or shuttle services, or secondary access to the east (Dartolo Road). To be sure
this access is provided, the City is working on a General Plan Amendment that would require an
internal east-west connection across all properties designated with the Z-1 and Z-2 overlay.
Therefore, the project has been conditioned to stagger hours until such time the access is provided
along the north side of SR-79 South.
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
10
Based on the air quality report provided for this project, the SCAQMD threshold for Nitrous Oxide
would be exceeded by 4% while other mobile source emissions were below their respective
significance thresholds. The study indicated that this excess could be easily reduced through
carpooling at the present time, and would be further reduced over time by current vehicle emission
standards. To achieve the reduction a mitigation measure has been imposed requiring the
establishment of a carpooling program for the school.
Geological this site has some stability issues, which will be over come with common building
practices. The most significant issue is the fault that bisects the property. The development of the
site recognized the fault line and complied with the requirements to keep structures out of the fault
zone. Any potential impact will be mitigated as the site develops in compliance with the
Geotechnical Report prepared for this site.
Drainage from this site will increase and as a result a new drainage channel must be install across a
neighboring parcel. The development of the project is required to complete this mitigation measure
as part of construction.
Zone Chanae/Planned Development Overlav
The General Plan for this area under the Z-1 designation sets the following key objectives:
"To achieve a comprehensively planned mixed-use development with compatible/
complementary mixtures of office, support commercial, residential, and services.
The project shall be limited in height to one or two stories and designated to be
compatible with existing ranch style residential. The project should take advantage
of the unique opportunity to incorporate open space resources into the design, scale,
and orientation of the development. The City recognizes that given the site
configuration and location that certain commercial recreation uses may be desirable
including, but not limited to, bowling alley, driving ranges, and health clubs. "
The PDO document has established the development standards and permitted uses for the entire
54 acres under review. Additionally, this document includes detailed information about the two
planning areas for the church/school campus and the professional/commercial center, circulation
and roadway design standards, design guidelines, and other information providing examples of
streetscape themes, plazas and courtyards, site orientation, and sign standards pertaining to the
large-scale development required for this property. The combined collection of elements provides a
comprehensive set of guidelines for the current and future development. Staff, therefore, believes
that it meets the objectives of the General Plan and that the impact of the project as mitigated, will
be no greater than with professional office development.
Because the PDO establishes a design theme and development limits on the entire 54 acres,
development is assured of being unified. The added benefit is that the church and school will help
offer diversity of uses along a major commercial thoroughfare. The development of the remaining
property under the PDO will be reviewed and assessed by the City to verify that those proposals will
achieve the continuity of a well-planned development.
Uses:
Issues of concern to staff regarding the PDO relate to a few uses, some development standards,
and some minor text and exhibit corrections to the document. Staff is recommending some
modifications to the Use Matrix as follows:
Bowling Alley
Mini-storage
Permitted Use
Not Permitted
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
'1
Modular Classrooms/buildings Conditional Use
Sports fields (with or without related school use) Conditional Use
. Bowling Alleys should be a permitted use for consistency with the General Plan Z -1 policies
because of its thought of this property has the unique opportunity to offer commercial
recreation uses.
. Mini-storage, though a conditionally permitted use, should not be a permitted use because it
is not a compatible land use adjacent to single family residences and is not an efficient use
of prime retail space.
. Modular Classrooms/buildings should be listed a conditionally permitted use due generally to
their the temporary nature and aesthetics, so that time limits can be placed on their use,
location, and appearance.
. Sports fields (with or without related school use) should be listed as a conditionally permitted
use because of the impact day or evening sporting events or other activities may have on
the surrounding properties by having the ability to limit the hours and days of activities and
the various operational aspects such as lighting.
Sianaae:
The PDO describes the establishment of a hierarchy of signs within the project area. Although, the
establishment of a PDO and a sign program allow for some variation from the City's Development
Code standards, there are a few variations that do not generally conform with other signs in the City,
therefore, staff is recommending the following modifications:
. Entry wall signs are not well defined in both text and exhibits, therefore staff is
recommending limiting this type of sign mounting area to a height of four (4) feet
. Tower with Electronic Signage should be limited to a height of 12 feet.
The proposed 21-foot tall reader board sign far exceeds the maximum height of a commercial center
identification sign height of 12 feet. By comparison, the tallest signs approved in the past few years
were the 18-foot high theater marquee signs at the Promenade Mall. Although reader board signs
are not permitted by code, message boards are permitted, therefore staff is comfortable in permitting
this sign with the condition that is not be used for flashing or constantly changing copy.
. Multi-Tenant Signs should be limited to a height of eight (8) feet.
Three signs are proposed at the maximum size typically used to identify tenants within a large
shopping center. Sign regulations for multi-tenant buildings in the Professional Office District
permits a freestanding sign that identifies the building only. As defined under the commercial
standards, multi-tenant signs should have half of the sign area used for a single tenant.
However, in the past, lower profile signs (8 feet) have been permitted, in shopping center sign
programs, with up to six tenant listings of equal size.
. Walls and fences shall be limited to a maximum of height of six (6) feet with the tops of walls
or fences being no higher than eight (8) feet as measured from the adjacent street curb
grade.
Within the PDO document there are inconsistencies with the wall height. On page 24,
paragraph 6, the screen wall height is listed as 4-5 feet in height and figures 9, 16, and 17 have
list 2-4 feet, while figure 30 shows 6 feet. The text and figures shall be amended for consistency
and shall include language that limits the overall height of the earthen berm and wall to an
overall height of 8 feet from top of curb as measured from street grade.
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
12
Conditional Use Permit
As part of the development review process staff, solicited comments from the surrounding
neighbors/residences at a neighborhood meeting regarding the proposal to develop this property for
a church and school. Most responses to this use were favorable because most people felt the
property would otherwise develop into commercial uses, thereby generating continuous traffic and
noise for the adjacent homeowner. What did arise out of the meeting were concerns about: the
installation and use of lighting on the sports fields, the extent of their use (hours and days), and
outdoor special events.
Liahtina:
Lighting of the sports field was not completely considered in the review because lighting studies
were not prepared for review by city staff. Although lights are shown on the plans, no judgment can
be made on the likely impact on the surrounding area with regard to light nuisance. Some
requested to not have lit ball fields at all, while others felt they would be acceptable if they were not
used past 9 or 10 P.M., nor used every night of the week. Many of these concerns were founded on
the idea that the city would be involved with these fields and would arrange for league activities.
The city has indicated that it is not interested in establishing a joint use arrangement with the school.
Staff believes that if lights are to be used, there must be a complete assessment of their impact, and
that this assessment should be in the form of an independent application for review and
consideration by the Planning Commission at a public hearing. Staff has placed a condition to this
effect upon the project.
Beyond using the field for sports there were concerns raised at the meeting about their use for
activities of a City-wide or regional nature. To assure that the field are not used by outside
organizations, a condition has been included limiting the ball field use to church and school
activities. In addition, there were concerns expressed about the specific events to be held on the
site throughout the year. Staff has conditioned the project to permit only church and sponsored
school events.
Modular Campuses:
The City understands the need for temporary facilities to be put in place until such time that
permanent structures can be built. The use of modular classroom on this site is acceptable to staff
but there are two concerns: the visibility of the modular units and the duration of their use. As
located on the site, Campus "A" with it's eight modular units will be near the residences units along
the north property line while the other nine units of Campus "B" will be at the heart of the site on
what is the site of the future Worship Center. As depicted on the plans for the two modular
campuses, there is a minimum of landscaping being provided to screen either campus from the
surrounding areas. Some of this buffering may be accomplished by the early installation of
perimeter landscaping or other onsite landscaping. Conditions have been added to provide
additional landscaping buffers around the modular sites and for the preparation of a phased
landscape plan that will accomplish the buffering requested.
The other concern of the modular campuses is the duration of their use. Although Campus "A"
(northern) is removed in Phase III and Campus "B" is to be removed in Phase IV. the timing cannot
be definitively defined. Development progress on each phase, as described by the applicant should
be about two years between each phase. The starting date of subsequent phases will be based on
needs and finances and may be accelerated or delayed. If each phase began just two years after
the subsequent phase it would be from four to six years and six to eight years before both campuses
would be removed. Should anything delay the phases these time lines could be pushed out even
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-Q2.doc
13
longer. As discussed by the applicant the modular campuses are only temporary and should not be
needed beyond five years. A condition of approval has been added that sets a five-year limit on the
use of modular units.
The overall design of the modular buildings offers a consistent style that carries over common
elements of the overall site. The school buildings all use a central tower with pitched roof while the
church uses arched colonnades and towers at their entries.
Development Plan
Landscape:
The landscape plan provides a variety of trees and shrubs along the highway, and staff believes it
will enhance the area. At this time there are two major projects on the south side of the highway that
are under development and review and staff wants to be sure that there is a coordination between
all three of these project to create some streetscape continuity. Staff has added a condition allowing
for minor modifications to the current plan if modifications should be necessary.
Aesthetics:
Of concern from the highway will be the public view of the developed site. Traveling east to west on
SR-79 highway along the project site at build-out one would see a meandering sidewalk and
parkway followed by a twenty foot deep landscape buffer that will include a four foot high
landscaped berm and a masonry wall or white rail fence. Beyond the landscape buffer screen wall,
at roughly 70 to 80 feet into the site, will be the administration building at the corner of Rancho
Pueblo Road, followed by the 365-foot length of the parking structure. Continuing along the
highway, setback 116 feet into the site will be the worship center with 240 feet of street exposure.
The remaining buildings, more than 220 feet into the site and visible from the highway will be the
chapel, the middle school, the gymnasium and high school buildings.
The administration building has a fairly large landscape buffer to enhance its street-oriented
elevations. However, the parking structure will rely on the thirty-six foot wide streetscape
landscaping as the primary buffer. For additional screening there are five small finger islands at the
base of the structure and landscape planters on the second, third, and fourth parking levels to
provide additional buffering. To ensure that sufficient planting area provided, staff is recommending
that the secondary backdrop of landscaping at the base of the structure be widened to the size of
the five landscape fingers. A condition has also been included to install landscape planter boxes on
the other elevations of the parking structure to provide additional softening from the upper parking
level.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS
The development of this property requires compliance with the General Plan to establish special
specific plan overlays to achieve a comprehensively planned mixed-use development along
Highway 79 South. The prepared Planned Development Overlay (under PA01-0522) has
accomplished this objective by creating a comprehensive document for the current proposal and
future development. This project's approval requires a change to the City's Zoning Map and
amendment to the Development Code creating zoning that is intended to be compatible with the
surrounding land uses without impacting the community.
The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit (PAOO-0470) forthe church and school campus
will be compatible and consistent with the surrounding area by way of the standards set contained in
the Planned Development document. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-92.doc
14
City Councils approval of PA01-0522 (Zoning Amendment) and PAOO-0470 (Development Plan/
Conditional Use Permit) for a church and school campus.
FINDINGS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (Code Section 17.04.010E)
1. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development
Code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional use permit is
consistent with the underlying site plan for this project, the City of Temecula Genera/ Plan,
the Planned Development Overlay, and the applicable sections of the Development Code,
and the Municipal Code.
2. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition, and development of
adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely
affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional use permit, with
conditions, is consistent with the City of T emecula General Plan, the Planned Development
Overlay, and the applicable sections of the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
3. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the
yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping and other
development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning
Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
Planning staff has reviewed the requirements of the performance standards delineated in the
Planned Development Overlay, as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code.
As a result, staff has determined that the proposed conditional use meets the zoning
requirements for integration into the surrounding neighborhood.
4. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
Provisions are made in the General Plan, the Planned Development Overlay, and the
Development Code to ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded
with the operation of the church and school facilities. The project is consistent with these
documents and will be conditioned to meet all applicable requirements.
5. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all applicable codes
and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
FINDINGS - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop a church and school
campus is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Office Professional and
with the adoption of the Planned Development Overlay for this area, in as much as it sets
development standards that permit schools and sets height limitations such as two story
building heights.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health.
safety, and general welfare.
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
15
The overall development of the land as conditioned, and designed protects the public health,
safety, and general welfare. The development plan for the site is consistent with the Planned
Development Overlay document and conforms to all of the applicable sections of the City's
Development Code and Design Guidelines regarding safe site design, signalized access
points, assigned student drop-off areas and structures that can be developed to meet
building and safety codes. The aesthetics' of the site and structure will both compliment and
enhance the surrounding homes and the community. Provisions have been made to create
a safe environment for people and to minimize the visual impact of the project, and all
phases of construction will be inspected to ensure compliance with the applicable building
and fire codes.
Attachments:
1. PC Resolution - CEQA - Blue Page 17
2. PC Resolution - Change of Zone - Blue Page 18
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval
3. PC Resolution - Conditional Use Permit - Blue Page 19
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval
4. PC Resolution - Development Plan - Blue Page 20
Exhibit A. Conditions of Approval
5. Letters of Correspondence - Blue Page 21
6. PDO Document - Blue Page 22
7. Initial Study/Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 23
8. Exhibits - Blue Page 24
A. Vicinity Map
B. Zoning Map
C. General Plan
D. Site Plan
E. Site Plan (Detailed)
F. Phasing Plan
G. Modular Campuses
H. Building Elevations and Floor
. Chapel
. Family Life Center
. Preschool
. Administration/Office Building
. Elementary School
. High School
. Middle School
. Gymnasium
. Adult Education
. Field House
. Storage and Maintenance Building
. Main Sanctuary
. Parking Structure
I. Landscape Plan
J. Rendering
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
16
ATTACHMENT NO.1
CECA
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
17
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM BASED ON THE
INITIAL STUDY AND ADOPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL
FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR PA01-0522 AND PAOO-
0470, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF
JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001
THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01-0522 (Zone
Change) and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan, for the property consisting of approximately 54
acres generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South
beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for
approximately 4,000 feet, for property known as portions of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on July 31, 2002, to consider the applications for the
Project and environmental review.
D. On July 31,2002, The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held
a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all person
interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning
Commission on those matters.
E. On July 31st, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and a
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CEQA.POC
Section 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based
on the whole record before it, finds, determines and declares that:
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential
environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings
contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no
substantial evidence that the project could have a significant effect on the
environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared. A
copy of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are attached hereto as
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required
by law and copies of the documents have been available for public review
and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community
Development, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
Ca. 92589.
C. The City Council reviewed the Negative Declaration and all comments
received regarding the Negative Declaration. The Project and the
Negative Declaration were discussed at regularly scheduled public
meetings of the Council held on June 25, 2002.
D. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in completed with
CEQA
E. There is no substantial evidence that the Project, as conditioned, will
have a significant effect on the environment.
F. The Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the Planning Commission.
G. The Mitigation Monitoring Plan set forth in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration has been prepared in accordance with law.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council
approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project and approve the Mitigation
Monitoring Plan for the Project.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 3151 day of July 2002.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 02-022 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 31 st day of July, 2001, by the
following vote:
AYES:
5
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso,
Telesio, and Chiniaeff
NOES:
o
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
o
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
o
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
None
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
ATTACHMENT NO.2
CHANGE OF ZONE
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31-02.doc
18
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 01-0522, A
CHANGE OF ZONE FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) TO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY- 5 (PDO-5), AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP AND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, AND ADOPTING THE STANDARDS AND
REGULATIONS CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING PDO
DOCUMENT, LOCATED ON NORTH SIDE OF STATE
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST OF
JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 4,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-060-001
THRU -004 & 959-070-001 THRU -006."
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01-0522 (Zone
Change) and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan, for the property consisting of approximately 54 acres
generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet
east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 4,000 feet,
for property known as portions of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No.
15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-
070-003 thru -006 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review
was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality
Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public
hearing on July 31, 2002, to consider the applications for the Project and
environmental review.
D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-_ approving a Mitigated Negative
Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Zone Change, and Conditional
Use Permit/Development Plan for the Project and recommended that the City
Council approve of a Zone Change for the Project.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.POC
E. On July 31, 2002, The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all person interested in the
Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on those
matters.
F. On July 31st, 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
recommends approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and a Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Project
Section 2.
following findings:
The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby makes the
A. The Project is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
The Project has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the
City's General Plan. These documents set policies and standards that protect
the health, safety and welfare of the community. Access and circulation are
adequate for emergency vehicles.
B. The Project is compatible with surrounding land uses.
C. The Project will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The Project
does will permit a comprehensive set of development standards to be applied to
the future, planned orderly development of the site.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council amend
the Official Zoning Map for the City of Temecula as follows:
A. For the properties identified Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211;
also known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 and 959-070-
003 thru -006, subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A,
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in
full.
B. The Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council amend Chapter
17.22 of the Temecula Municipal Code by adding thereto the Rancho Pueblo
Planned Development Overlay District as Sections 17.22._ through
17.22. , inclusive, of the Temecula Municipal Code, as said sections are
set forth in the document attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Ordinance and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any
and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary prior to City Council review.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.POC
2
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 31st day of July 2002.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 31st day of July, 2001, by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.POC
3
EXHIBIT A
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
ZONE CHANGE
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.DOC
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0470 (Zone Change)
Project Description:
Zone change to amend the City's Zoning Map
designation from PO (Professional Office) to PDO-5
(Planned Development) and adopt the standards
contained in the Planned Development document for a
54-acre site located on the north side of State Route 79
South, beginning 480 feet past of Jedediah Smith Road
and continuing east for 4,000 feet.
DIF Category:
N/A
Assessor Parcel No's:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-001 thru -006
July 31, 2002
July 31, 2004
The following PD~ text revisions shall be made prior to City Council review:
1 . The Planned Development Overlay title shall be changed to PDO-5.
2. All signs along SR-79 South shall maintain a minimum of 300 feet of separation from one
another.
3. The permitted uses shall be amended as follows:
a. Bowling Alley Permitted
b. Mini-storage Not Permitted
c. Modular Classrooms/buildings Conditional
d. Sports fields (with or without related school use) Conditional
4. References to self-storage and mini storage facilities shall be removed from the text on pages 9
and 13.
5. The footnote number 3 on page 17 shall be revise '1hree stories" to read '1hree levels (two
stories)"
6. Remove the reference to the '1raffic circle" on page 20, paragraph 3.
7. Throughout the PDO document text on page 24, paragraph 6, the screen wall height is listed as
4-6 feet in height and figures 9, 16, and 17 have list 2-4 feet, while figure 30 shows 6 feet. The
text and figures shall be amended for consistency and shall include language that limits the
overall height of walls and fences to a maximum of height of six (6) feet with the top of the walls
or fences being no higher than eight (8) feet above the adjacent street curb grade.
8. In section IV. Parking Areas, paragraph two, fourth line shall have "are not required" changed to
read" may not be required."
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.POC
5
9. On page 26, paragraph three shall include the following: "Such hydro-seeded area should be
provided with temporary irrigation until such time that the seed mix has germinated and
established itself." .
1 O. Figure 15 needs to be amended to show the curb return and the curb along Highway 79 and the
height of the High Tower shall be listed at 12 feet.
11. The text on page 39, paragraph one shall be rewritten to read as foilows: "Site identification signs
wiil comply with the requirements set forth herein and to the City Design Standards, and will be
mounted on monument walls no greater than four (4) feet in height on either one or both sides
of entrance roadways (see Figures 33 and 34).
12. The tex1 on page 39, paragraph two shall be rewritten to read as follows: All free standing sign
muse be the monument-type no taller than eight (8) feet with no more that six (6) equal sized
tenant spaces with architectural eiements at the top, base and sides, similar to Figure 34. There
shall be a minimum of 300 feet of separation between free standing signs along any street
frontage with the exception of wall mounted site identification signs.
13. Figure 34 Signs A, B, C, shall be redrawn to reflect a sign no taller than eight (8) feet with no
more that six (6) equal sized tenant spaces.
14. Page 39, paragraph six shall be amended to read as follows: ''Tenants using an entire building
will be allowed one freestanding monument sign similar to el-the designs shown in Figure 34 but
not to exceed a height of four (4) feet nor a copy area greater than 30 square feet,"
15. Figure 35, Sign F, shall be amended to show the church signage tower with a height no greater
than 12 feet.
By piacing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the above-
mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project
shail be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:IC U P\2000100-Q470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso ZC.POC
6
ATTACHMENT NO.3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlStaff report PC 7-31 -02.doc
19
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, FOR THE OPERATION OF A
146,826 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH COMPLEX ON A 39-ACRE
SITE, INCLUDING A 1,500-SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT
INTERIM SANCTUARY WITH ASSEMBLY ROOM AND
NURSERY; A 300 SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL; A
3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE FOOT WORSHIP CENTER; A
9,695 SQUARE FOOT PRE-SCHOOL; AND THE PLACEMENT
OF SEVENTEEN (17) MODULAR CLASSROOM BUILDINGS AS
TEMPORARY FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE
OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET EAST
OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF
TRACT NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBERS 959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-070-003 THRU -006.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01 '0522 (Zone
Change) and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan, for the property consisting of approximately 54
acres generally located on north side of State Highway 79 South
beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for
approximately 4,000 feet, for property known as portions of lot 3 and lots
4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006 ("Project").
C. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental
review was conducted as required by law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
D. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on July 31, 2002
E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2002-_ recommending
City Council approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan for the Zone Change, and Conditional Use
Permit/Development Plan for the Project.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.POC
F. On July 31st 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held
a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons
interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning
Commission on these matters.
G. On July 31s', 2002, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
Recommended the City Council approve the Conditional Use Permit for
the Project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings as
required in Section 17.04.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
development code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional
use permit is consistent with the underlying site plan for this project, the
City of Temecula General Plan, the Planned Development Overlay, and
the applicable sections of the Development Code, and the Municipal
Code.
B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition,
and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and the
proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses,
buildings, or structures.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the proposed conditional
use permit, with conditions, is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan, the Planned Development Overlay, and the applicable
sections of the Development Code, and the Municipal Code.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities,
buffer area, landscaping and other development features prescribed in
the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or
Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood.
Planning staff has reviewed the requirements of the performance
standards delineated in the Planned Development Overlay, as well as the
applicable sections of the Development Code. As a result, staff has
determined that the proposed conditional use meets the zoning
requirements for integration into the surrounding neighborhood.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the
health, safety, and welfare of the community.
Provisions are made in the General Plan, the Planned Development
Overlay, and the Development Code to ensure that the public health,
safety, and welfare are safeguarded with the operation of the church and
school facilities. The project is consistent with these documents and will
be conditioned to meet all applicable requirements.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.POC
2
E. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based
on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the
Planning Commission or City Council.
The project has been completely reviewed, as a whole, in reference to all
applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission.
Section 3. The Planning Commission of The City Of Temecula hereby recommends
the City Council approve Planning Application No. PAOO-0470, a Conditional Use Permit, for the
operation of a church on a 39-acre site establishing a 146,826 square foot church complex on a
39-acre site, including a 1,500-seat, 26,927 square foot interim sanctuary with assembly room
and nursery; a 300 seat, 5,856 square foot chapel; a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship
center; a 9,695 square foot pre-school; and the placement of seventeen (17) modular classroom
buildings as temporary facilities, located on the north side of State Highway 79 South beginning
480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet, for
property known as portions of lot 3 and lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known
as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006, subject to the
specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by
this reference as though set forth in full.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any
and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 31'st day of July 2002.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske. Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 01-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 31st day of July, 2001, by the
following vote:
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.DOC
3
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.POC
4
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
EXHIBIT B
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc. DOC
5
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0470 (Conditional Use Permit)
Project Description:
DIF Category:
Assessor Parcel No's:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Conditional Use Permit to operate a church and private
school with 146,826 square feet of total religious building
area, and 18,000 students and 136,771 square feet of total
school building area; and to place seventeen (17) temporary
modular classrooms on a 39-acre site, located on the north
side of the State Route 79 South, beginning 480 feet east of
Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for 3,400 feet.
Exempt
959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-001 thru -006
July 31, 2002
July 31, 2004
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in
the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which
includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by
Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated
or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(a) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period
the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from
any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application
which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public
Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the
way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the
permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time
R:IC U P\2000100.Q470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.POC
6
period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall
deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover
anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit
once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or
cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any
of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required
deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the
applicant.
3. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4. The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval for Planning Application No.
PAOO-0470, unless superseded by these conditions of approval. All these conditions
shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this conditional use
permit.
5. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's
Development Code.
6. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this Conditional Use Permit.
7. Modular buildings shown on the approval plans shall be utilized for a period of time not
to exceed five (5) years from the date of occupancy. Any other future proposed modular
buildings shall require approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
8. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA01-0522
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Name printed
R:IC U P\2000100-D470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso CUP pc.POC
7
ATTACHMENT NO.4
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
PC RESOLUTION NO.
R:\C U P\2000\OO-0470 Rancho Community Church\Staff report PC 7-31-02.doc
20
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2002-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 00-0470, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF A CHURCH AND
SCHOOL CAMPUS TO ACCOMMODATE 1,800 STUDENTS ON A
39-ACRE SITE. THE OVERALL PROPOSAL WILL INCLUDE
146,826 SQUARE FEET OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION WHICH
INCLUDES: A 1,500-SEAT, 26,927 SQUARE FOOT, INTERIM
SANCTUARY WITH ASSEMBLY ROOM AND NURSERY, A 300-
SEAT, 5,856 SQUARE FOOT CHAPEL, A 11,860 SQUARE FOOT
ADULT EDUCATION BUILDING, A 3,500 SEAT, 43,727 SQUARE
FOOT WORSHIP CENTER, AND A TWO STORY-FOUR LEVEL
PARKING STRUCTURE (WITH 918 SPACES TOTALING 380,023
SQUARE FEET); AND 136,771 SQUARE FEET OF SCHOOL
FACILITIES FOR FIRST THROUGH TWELFTH GRADE
CLASSROOM FACILITIES CONSISTING OF: AN INTERIM
MODULAR SCHOOL CAMPUS WITH A TOTAL OF 17 MODULAR
CLASSROOM BUILDINGS, TWO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BUILDINGS TOTALING 64,156 SQUARE FEET, A 28,826 SQUARE
FOOT MIDDLE SCHOOL, A 17,900 SQUARE FOOT HIGH
SCHOOL, A 9,695 SQUARE FOOT PRE-SCHOOL, TWO-UNIT
FIELD HOUSEl RESIDENCE BUILDINGS, A 16,194 SQUARE
FOOT GYMNASIUM; AND A TWO-STORY, 44,406 SQUARE FOOT
ADMINISTRATION/OFFICE BUILDING, LOCATED ON NORTH
SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH BEGINNING 480 FEET
EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD AND CONTINUING EAST FOR
APPROXIMATELY 3,000 FEET, FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS
PORTIONS OF LOT 3 AND LOTS 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 OF TRACT
NO. 15211; ALSO KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS
959-060-001 THRU -004 & 959-070-003 THRU -006.
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find,
determine and declare that:
A. Rancho Community Church, filed Planning Application No. 01-0522 (Zone Change)
and Planning Application No. 00-0470, Conditional Use PermiVDevelopment Plan,
for the property consisting of approximately 54 acres generally located on north side
of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and
continuing east for approximately 4,000 feet, for property known as portions of lot 3
and lots 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's Parcel
Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006 ("Project").
B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review was
conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
1
C. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing
on July 31,2002.
D. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No. 2002-_ recommending City Council approval of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan, and Resolution No.
2002-_ recommending City Council approval of the Zone Change for the
Project.
Section 2. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings as required in
Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan forTemecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposed uses are in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of state law and local ordinances. The plan to develop a church and
school campus is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation of Office
Professional and with the adoption of the Planned Development Overlay for this
area, in as much as it sets development standards that permit schools and sets
height limitations such as two story building heights.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The overall development of the land as conditioned, and designed protects the
public health, safety, and general welfare. The development plan for the site is
consistent with the Planned Development Overlay document and conforms to all of
the applicable sections of the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines
regarding safe site design that controlled and signalize access points, assigned
student drop-off areas and structures that can be developed to meet building and
safety codes. The aesthetics' of the site and structure will both compliment and
enhance the surrounding homes and the community. The design of the site has all
access points and most parking kept away from the adjacent homes. Provisions
have been made to create a safe environment for people and to minimize the visual
impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to ensure
compliance with the applicable building and fire codes. Access and circulation are
adequate for emergency vehicles. Provisions have been made to minimize the
visual impact of the project, and all phases of construction will be inspected to
ensure compliance with the applicable building and fire codes.
Section 3. The Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council of the City of
Temecula approve the Application for a Development Plan (PAOO-0470) for the design and
construction of a church and school campus to accommodate 1 ,800 students on a 39-acre site. The
overall proposal will include 146,826 square feet of religious institution which includes: a 1,500-seat,
26,927 square foot, interim sanctuary with assembly room and nursery, a 300-seat, 5,856 square
foot chapel, a 11 ,860 square foot adult education building, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot worship
center, and a two story-four level parking structure (with a 918 spaces totaling 380,023 square feet);
and 136,771 square feet of school facilities for first through twelfth grade classroom facilities
consisting of: two interim modular school campus with a total of 17 moqular classroom buildings, two
elementary school building totaling 64,156 square feet, a 28,826 square foot middle school, a
17,900 square foot high school, a 9,695 square foot preschool, two-unit field house/ residence
R:IC U P\2000100-o470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso PP.POC
2
buildings, a 16,194 square foot gymnasium; and a two story, 44,406 square foot
administration/office building; located on north side of State Highway 79 South beginning 480 feet
east of Jedediah Smith Road and continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet, for property known
as portions of lot 3 and lots 4,5,6,7, 8, 9, & 10 of Tract No. 15211; also known as Assessor's
Parcel Numbers 959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-003 thru -006, subject to the specific conditions
of approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as
though set forth in full.
Section 5. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally recommends approval of the Application(s) according to the specific conditions set
forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and
all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 31 sl day of July 2002.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 31 sl day of July, 2002.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 02-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City
of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 31st day of July, 2001, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
3
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN)
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso DP.POC
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 00-0470 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
DIF Category:
Assessor Parcel No's:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Development Plan to for the design and construction of a
church and school campus to accommodate 1,800
students on a 39-acre site. The overall proposal will
include 146,826 square feet of religious institution which
includes: a 1,500-seat, 26,927 square foot, interim
sanctuary with assembly room and nursery, a 300-seat,
5,856 square foot chapel, a 11,860 square foot adult
education building, a 3,500 seat, 43,727 square foot
worship center, a two story-four level parking structure
(with a 918 spaces totaling 380,023 square feet); and
136,771 square feet of school facilities for first through
twelfth grade classroom facilities consisting of: two
interim modular school campus with a total of 17
modular classroom buildings, two elementary school
building totaling 64,156 square feet, a 28,826 square foot
middle school, a 17,900 square foot high school, a 9,695
square foot preschool, two-unit field house! residence
buildings, a 16,194 square foot gymnasium; and a two
story, 44,406 square foot administration/office building;
located on north side of State Highway 79 South
beginning 480 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and
continuing east for approximately 3,000 feet.
TSD
959-060-001 thru -004 & 959-070-001 thru -006
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1 . The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Community Development Department - Planning
Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount
of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1 ,328.00) which includes the One
Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1 ,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code
Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable
the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required
under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(a) and California Code of Regulations Section
15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso OP.DOC
5
the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required above,
the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2. All mitigated requirements contained in the Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be
implemented.
3. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency
or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all
claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary
damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters
of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the
appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4
(Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167).
The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the
action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions
of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly
notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its
officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit,
the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant.
4. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
5. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Planning Application No. 01-0522 for PDO-5.
6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division. Additionally, the following criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
7. The detail level of the site plan does not. Construction plans shall provide enough details
and dimensions to show the differences between planters, pavement and/or the plaza areas
when reviewed during plan check.
SITE PLAN:
8. The berming as shown on the site and grading plans appears as a 2:1 slope along the entire
site despite the description of varied sloped and heights mentioned in the PDO document.
The requirement for varied slopes shall be shown on the precise grading plan.
9. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
6
10. The pilaster shall be enlarged to provide a greater offset of the walls continuous length there
should be locations where the wall is offset, not installed and/or the height appears to be as
little as two feet.
11. Provide greater meander or offsets to the wall in those locations where the wall does not
have any offsets or undulation for over 300 feet along the highway.
12. The location of the site amenities noted in the PDO document shall be referenced on the site
and landscape plans for review and approval during plan check.
13. Continue the sidewalk along SR-79 South into the ball field on the west side of the driveway
and expand the entry area to accommodate the sidewalk.
14. Indicate the type of durable benches and tables to be provide for the occupants of the
administration building. The Director of Planning shall provide details of these amenities
during plan check for approval.
15. The construction plans shall include design details of the paving, plaza, walkways, and site
furniture consistent with the design standards in Section 8.B. (Accent Elements) of the PDO
and subject to the approval of the Director of Planning.
16. During review of the construction documents those items not currently provided in detail for
verified compliance with the PDO shall be requested and reviewed for consistency with the
PDO standards and subject for to review and approval by the Director of Planning prior to
issuance of the building permit.
ELEVATIONS:
17. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits "E and F" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning
Division as amended by these changes:
a. All mechanical and roof-mounted equipment shall be screened by building elements
that were designed for that purpose as an integral part of the building. When
determined to be necessary by the Director of Planning, the parapet shall be raised
to provide for this screening.
b. Landscape planter boxes shall be utilized on the other elevations of the parking
structure to provide softening from the upper parking level as describe in PDO
Section 4.E. (Circulation Plan - Parking).
c. Relief shall be provided to the rear and side elevations of the field house to break up
the bland wall areas. Elements such as windows on the second floor sides and
columns on the rear similar to the front could provide the type of relief desired.
18. The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file with
the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Any deviation from the
approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material Finish & Color
Windows, doors
Stucco wall face
Copper Penny green glazing
Sandelwood #46 - Tan
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
7
Molder and columns
Wainscot veneer
Roofing
Trellises
Pre-cast concrete Grey #3
Split-fact CMU veneer - tan
Spanish "S" tile - California Mission Blend
Copper Canyon
LANDSCAPING:
19. The Landscaping Plan shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape
Plan) and as amended by the following:
a. Provide a landscape planter in all parking lots (used for parking only) between every
tenth parking stall and at the ends of each row. There must be one tree for every
four parking spaces within the parking field. All planter islands must have a 12-inch
courtesy curb and shall maintain a minimum of five feet of inside planting width.
b. The planting areas around the buildings shall maintain at least 5 feet of internal
space depth and width to sustain trees and shrubs.
c. Increase the size of the five landscape fingers along the south side of the parking
structure to the equivalent of three parking spaces or install a large (10 feet or more)
landscape planter along the entire south side of the parking structure to offer the
opportunity for large growth trees to be planted to provide an additional vertical
element of landscape screening from the highway.
d. Phase one development shall include the installation of all improvements on both
sides of Rancho Pueblo. This includes curbs, sidewalks, and landscape planting
design and installation on both sides of the street (for a minimum of 16 feet from the
face of curb) and both corner entry statements of Rancho Pueblo at SR-79 South.
e. Blend the 2:1 berm that creates the backdrop behind all entry points from the
highway so they do not appear as sharp-engineered slopes. Blend the berms into
something more natural and inviting such a bowl at these entry points. Be sure that
the landscape plan and grading plans can express the finish appearance.
f. A landscape Phasing Plan shall be prepared to coordinate the extent of the
landscape installation proposed with each developing phase of the project.
g. To the greatest extent possible, permanent landscape areas shall be installed
around the modular campuses.
h. Larger landscape buffers shall be provided around the modular campus and will be
subject to the approval of the Director of Planning.
i. Several trees shall be installed around the perimeter of the temporary play yard of
the modular classroom to aid in screening and to offer shade to the students.
j. Prior to the preparation of construction landscape plans the streetscape design shall
be reviewed for consistency with other development proposals along SR-79.
k. Due to the scale of some elements of the landscape plan the applicant shall, prior to
preparation of any construction plans, meet with the Planning Department for review
of detail elements defined in the PDO document that are to be incorporated and shall
be approved by the Director of Planning.
Liahtina:
20. All parking areas shall have lighting including those areas serving dual purposes as hard
surface play areas and overflow parking, to assure nighttime safety and security.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
B
21. Lighting on the upper deck of the parking structure shall be on timers set to turn on the lights
by 11 :00 p.m.
22. Lighting on the parking structure will be verified for compliance with the PDO's description
during plan check to verify that it is not visible from off-site.
23. Lighting of the ball fields shall not be permitted with this application approval and will be
subject to later review and consideration by the Planning Commission at a public hearing
under separate application. A request for lighting will require the filing of an Administrative
Development Plan, and the appropriate lighting studies and analysis as determined by the
Director of Planning.
Sians:
24. The maximum height of the Rancho Pueblo Church and School reader board sign shall be
12 feet.
25. The freestanding multi-tenant sign shall be limited to eight (8) feet in height with up to six
tenant listings of equal size.
26. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
27. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided
by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed
set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files.
28. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
29. If necessary the applicant shall revise the necessary Exhibits (Site Plan, Elevations,
Landscape Plan, Color and Material Board) to reflect the final Conditions of Approval and
submit five (5) full size copies.
30. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division
for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color
and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit of the colored
architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on
the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
31. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
32. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso DP.DOC
9
Community Development Department - Planning Division for approval. These plans shall
conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify
the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
e. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
33. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
34. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community Development Department-
Planning Division for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the
Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
35. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces
not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued
for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's
expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909
696-3000."
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso DP.POC
10
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least 3
square feet in size.
36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
37. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
39. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the California Department of Transportation
prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed State right-of-way
per Caltrans letters dated May 16, 2002 and May 22, 2002.
40. Approval from Metropolitan Water District shall be obtained for any work within their
easement.
41 . All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
42. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or
property owner.
43. The vehicular movement for Highway 79 South at the westerly access to the site shall be
restricted to a right in/right out movement subject to approval by Caltrans. The method of
controlling this movement shall be approved by the Director of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
44. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
45. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
46. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
47. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'sIReso DP.DOC
11
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
48. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify
impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the
properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities,
including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be the responsibility of the Developer.
49. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
50. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Metropolitan Water District
d. Caltrans
e. Planning Department
f. Fire Prevention Bureau
g. Building and Safety Department
h. Department of Public Works
51. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
52. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
53. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
54. The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of
Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall
be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002.
55. Prior to the first building permit, a final map shall be recorded, unless otherwise approved by
the Director of Public Works.
56. Prior to the first building permit in Phase III, a fault hazard investigation shall be approved by
Riverside County Geologist.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso DP.DOC
12
57. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the. site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
58. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards) to include installation
of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
b. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Chapel Lane.
c. Install a traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo
Road
59. Roads shall be designed and constructed to meet City public road standards and remain
privately maintained until a connection is made to a publicly maintained road to the east.
The following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets as shown
on the site plan:
a. Chapel Lane - Entry (64 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk and utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer).
b. Chapel Lane (48 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
c. Rancho Pueblo Road - Entry (88' R/W) to include the installation of street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and
sewer)
d. Rancho Pueblo Road (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements,
paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer)
e. Sports Center - Entry (24 feet curb to curb) to include the installation of street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer)
f. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90).
60. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso OP.DOC
13
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic
signal systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines
61. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
62. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside
Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
63. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed
by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City
Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property.
64. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
65. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
66. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
67. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase I, the traffic signal at the intersection of
Highway 79 South and Rancho Pueblo Road shall be installed and operational
68. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase II or before any access is provided, other
than an emergency access, the traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and
Chapel Lane shall be installed and operational.
69. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
70. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed perthe
approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
71. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'slReso DP,POC
14
Public Works.
BUILDING & SAFETY DEPARTMENT
72. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the
Temecula Municipal Code.
73. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing complialJce
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
74. A receipt or clearance letterfrom the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
75. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
76. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
77. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The
path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope,
travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled
Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
78. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1 , 1998)
79. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
80. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
81. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
82. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire
alarm systems.
83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
84. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
85. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
86. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review. I
87. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufactl:lrer
R:IC U P\2000100-Q470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO's\Reso PP.OOC
15
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
88. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility.
89. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
90. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
91. Show all building setbacks.
92. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday: 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these
conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
93. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
94. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at
20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a
total fire flow of 4850 GPM with a 4-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted
during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given
above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A)
95. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Fire hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x4"
x 2-21/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacentto
public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be
located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC
903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
96. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2)
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.POC
16
97. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020)
98. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Each phase will have to stand-
alone for purpose of access and water flow.
99. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
100. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet.
(CFC sec 902)
101. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
102. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent. (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14)
103. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet, which have not been completed, shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
104. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
105. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be
signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature
block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National
Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1 )
106. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
107. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall give a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single-family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.OOC
17
Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
108. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
109. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10)
110. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, based on an extra burden of protection a
standpipe water delivery system will be installed in any multi story parking structures.
111. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
112. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
113. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
114. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled combustible
stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety features: an
automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class and storage
arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department
access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing high-piled combustible
stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article 81 and all applicable
National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
115. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant
shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the
storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both
the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
Special Conditions
116. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
117. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
118. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit.
R:\C U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchIRESO'sIReso OP.OOC
18
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
119. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
The TCSD has reviewed the Development Plan for the aforementioned project and conditions the
project as follows:
GENERAL CONDITIONS:
120. Prior to issuance of building permits or installation of street lights, whichever comes first, the
developer shall file an application with the TCSD and pay the appropriate energy fees related to
the transfer of said street lights into the TCSD maintenance program.
121. If landscaped medians are conditioned by Public Works the following additional TCSD
conditions will apply.
a. Prior to the first building permit the landscape plans for the proposed raised medians shall
be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Services.
b. Installation of the landscape improvements within the medians shall commence pursuant to
a pre-job meeting with the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent and monitored in accordance
with the TCSD inspection process.
c. All perimeter landscaping and parkways, within the commercial development, shall be
maintained by the property owner.
d. The landscape improvements within the raised landscape medians shall be completed to
TCSD standards prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.
OTHER AGENCIES
122. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of
Transportation transmittal dated May 22, 2002, a copy of which is attached.
123. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated November 29,2000, a copy of which is attached.
124. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health transmittal dated November 28,2000, a copy of which
is attached.
125. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Easter Information
Center transmittal dated December 4, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
126. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Fish and Wildlife
Service transmittal dated February 12, 2001, a copy of which is attached.
127. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Metropolitan Water
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'slReso DP.DOC
19
District of Southern California transmittal dated January 16, 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
128. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of the
Army transmittal dated March 23, 2001, a copy of which is attached.
129. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County Flood
Control transmittal dated December 26, 2000, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date.
Name printed
R:IC U P\2000100-0470 Rancho Community ChurchlRESO'sIReso DP.DOC
20