The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTract Map 9833-2 Lot 1 & 2 Rough Grading Report IT .H.E. Soils Co. .hone: (909) 678-9669 FAX: (909) 678-9769 11705 Central Street, Suite A . Wildomar, CA 92595 E-mail: thesoilsco@aol.com I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I September 15, 2000 RECEIVED MAR 8 2001 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Mr. Art Nelson Brookstone Construction 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 300 Temecu1a, California 92593 SUBJECT: REPORT OF ROUGH GRADING Proposed Single-Family Residence Lots 1&2, TM 9833-2 Mariposa Place Temecula, Riverside County, California Work Order No. 084001.22 Dear Mr. Nelson: INTRODUCTION In accordance with your request, we have prepared this Report of Rough Grading presenting the results of our observation and testing during rough grading at the subject site. All compaction test results are included in this report in Appendix B, Table I. The subject site was graded in accordance with the requirements of the city of Temecula, and the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The 40-sca1e "Precise Grading & Erosion Control Plan - Lot 1&2 TM 9833-2", prepared by Armstrong Development Services of Corona, California, was utilized during grading and to locate our field density tests and was utilized as a base map for our test locations presented as Plate 1. ACCOMPANYING MAPS AND APPENDICES Location Map - Figure 1 (2,000-scale) Density Test Location Map - Plate 1 (40-scale) Appendix A - References Appendix B- Laboratory Test Results Appendix C - Results of Compaction Tests I.H.E. Soils Co. w. O. 08400 \.22 \. _ .__ ,_"_"_",-,,,,,_~,.~;,,_~""'T..U_;....,..,............; - - .,= r.... II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Art Nelson September 15,2000 Page 2 Proposed Development The subject site is proposed for construction of a single family home with detached garage and barn and associated driveways, landscaping and tennis court. Site Description The subject site is located in the city of Temecula in southwest Riverside County, California. The site is bordered on all sides by developed large parcel residential development. The geographical relationships of the site and surrounding area are shown on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. Topography, prior to grading consisted of an existing hillside with natural gradients of approximately 20% to 40%. Prior to grading, vegetation on the subject site consisted, for the most part, of a moderate growth of annual weeds and grasses. Overall relief at the subject site prior to grading was approximately 50:!: feet. KEYWAY EXCAVATION AND RECOMPACTION ODSERV ATIONS & TESTING Prior to rough grading, the proposed site was cleared of vegetation, which was removed from the subject site. Rough grading operations consisted of the excavation ofa keyway along the toes of the proposed slopes surrounding the subject pads. The keyway was founded a minimum of I-ft into dense bedrock materials and were tihed at a minimum inclination of 2% into the existing hillside. The exposed earth materials within the keyway were scarified a minimum of 12-inches below the exposed surface, moisture conditioned to near optimum moisture and recompacted to 90% of the dry deosity as determined by ASTM 1557. Benching was maintained into dense bedrock materials at all times during grading operations. All colluvial soils were removed during benching operations and were utilized as fill materials. The materials used for fill consisted of on-site silty sands (Unified Soil Classification - SM) derived from the on-site colluvial & bedrock materials. Fill placement and compaction was achieved utilizing a D8 sized dozer, 613 sized water pull and 633 scraper. Moisture conditioning was accomplished utilizing a water truck and water pull. The fill was placed in 4 to 6-incIi thick lifts and moisture conditioned, as needed, to bring the material to near optimum moisture content, and was then properly compacted. A minimum degree of compaction of90"1o was required, as determined by ASTM 1557. CutfFiII Transitions Rough grading at the site included overexcavation, recompaction and fill placement. Transitions from cut to fill within the house and garage building pad were eliminated by overexcavating the pad areas 3 feet below finish pad grade to 5 feet outside the building footprint as staked. The overexcavation should be reviewed for appropriateness when building plans are finalized. The barn pad was not overexcavated, therefore, a transition could exist within the building area. T.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 'L- I ,.._._ L"_,;",-"~""""""..'k'_____'->-.'..-..:..'....,~.;:;;:-........~...,-~.......1OLli--.. I T .H.E. Soils Co. Phullc: 19()9) 678-9669 fA.\:: (909) 678-9769 1117().; CClIlrJI Strcct, Suite A . Wildomar, C\ 92.;9.; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .0. , XI ,~- ; ; " -,-< :::""' ..::> ~ - \ - J\~~~' \ l. :~ IndIan, ___ Sunal Grounde~./ '_.~ _____ - , , , , 'v- .' ~...-- . .-v ,.- /" --- ~~. / ::l o " E , ~ Q,L.-1r---: , ~', ,Q I k l~ II '0 'I 't.I II .'"' " :;'r"~~~~=:,,,,,: 11 - ~l , "~. fGrave 11/ ,.' i~ ,,I ,., 'it " I~ . It. '1 _~; " ." "-- .. ''j /, -:~ ~- ~"':: / '- --", ~- ........\ " -"'.......:- ----- - , = ~ \ .::::;-- , -;- -;:;-i:;~- -.--.-_"0.- ;tIell ~ ~o".. ~ ~,. '" ~" /. A ~ ~ /Iwell ""01 ~ l-7/ ",''- - Q-?.o_ ,> r. /~II_ ADAPTEO FROM A USGS 7,5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAP- PECHANGA. CA.. 1968 (PHOTOREVISED 1988) ., '.' . , "'-- --..~ -- -- '-- ..-'-" o ~ -- .. ---:^ " -., <- /,-;, " ~ o 1000 2000 3000 '000 SCAU: FT. SITE LOCATION MAP WO.# 084001.22 Figure: SEPT 2000 1 '!> Date: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Art Nelson Septernber15,2000 Page 3 TESTING PROCEDURES Field Density Testin~ Field density testing was performed in accordance with ASTM Test Method D2922-91 (nuclear gauge). Areas failing to meet the minimum compaction requirements were reworked and retested until the specified degree of compaction was achieved. The elevations and the results of the field density tests are presented in Appendix C, Resuhs of Compaction Tests, Table I. The approximate locations of the tests are shown on the Density Test Location Map, Plate 1. Maximum Density -Determinations Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture determinations were performed in the laboratory on representative samples of on-site soils used in the fill operations. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM 01557-91, Test Method A The test resuhs, which were utilized in determining the degree of compaction achieved during fill placement, are presented in Appendix B, Table L Expansion Index TestinJ: Expansion index testing was performed on a representative sarnple of the upper loft of the earth materials exposed at the pad surface. The results yielded an expansion index of 10, which indicated that on-site soils exhibit very low expansion potential. Sulfate Content It is anticipated that, from a corrosivity standpoint, Type 11 Portland Cement can be used for construction. Sulfate content testing was conducted on imported soils at the completion ofrough grading. Laboratory analysis results indicated 40 parts-per-million (ppm) of water extractable sulfates (S04), which equates to a negligible sulfate exposure (1997 UBC, Table 19-A-4). Sulfate content testing should be conducted on imported soils prior to their approval as structural fill material. Slope Construction Slopes on the subject site consisted of approximately 2: 1 (horizonta1:vertical) fill slopes on the south, east and west sides of the building pad and on the west side of the barn pad to a maximum height of 28:!:-ft. The fill slopes were constructed to approximate rough grade elevations and track walked to achieve compaction. An approximately 10-ft high cut slope was constructed at a 2: 1 (horizonta1:vertica1) gradient along the north side of the proposed pad. The slope exposed coarse grained bedrock. I.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 ~ :-l :c ~ '" o 1; (")' o 3: "I:l .. 2: -< VI II ~~ ~r- .. ~ 'vi:3 ~<c ,..... , '- ~~ -. ;;l !I: m o c: s; IlL o~"'iil 8~~~ c:ii:"''' ZoE ::;!m. g N 2l :u Z j;: ~ :u " o :u o l!l I ~ ~ ~ ilR :!I N ~ " ~ ~ o on ~ @ . ~ " g ~ 1) ~ o Z o on 8 !I: " ~. f} o Z ~ - - ~( "" ... - - '".... . Q>-:>oo~ '" .... .... ~ . . ~, ~~ ..., <:::. ~ .....t-, "-.. ~~t' :>;:;~ "-.. ~~I /" I <I ~ ~ :s: - '\I ;f) '" c::. .~ "'i '" ~ t"l :.; .... /~ - ~' L~ \!Y - - 2_" t7'!::J"' E ------ , \", ~"' 'Z\ - ,. .- " '- i ~." ." ' ""."'f t;;;'\ \.!!Y ~\~," ;/'!pJ "".(J'l,k .'. u, '-:j!='r ......" < '" ~'~~l;::: ~""'I .:.; "- '.' I ~.~: ., ~ Cl <: T -~- , ., \ ~ ti I ~ l ~II "- I , I '. , ..... , , I \ I "c-i I ' I , 1 '---, I o ::.._......., M.N I -'-, \ ..----1 I , I ------_-1 ! '-- j / --f/ / -~----, i '. "' ! , :oi ;:l:! ,~ ..... -,: '- b. ~ A . r I )- ! I! , 4 ~;, ~ I - I '--' ~ I .. ,~ ' "'-- I.... /' .- -.-t--: I" f--('.V@'!'(1:)\'I"' I w. . '" c_ I ..~; '.. I ....--- I o'] L h - . ~'- ' J '___--+-/_ :~-:- . , '-~--- "/~ " ". -3-c..IL - _ \ / .... ' ' ~. , '@ " '.0( '. ~,...".. . \ 0> . ~\,. -... ...:.- . \/ "~ ~.~' . . ,,' --;..~ -.L <i" /' '.~ ...,~..[ '....'.. " . r . "( ""@}'@'I\)/ ",f -... '. , . ,~ \",.,,1- ," ". c '. w @ . (~ .eJ Jl1P:;- %~ N 1'1_' /, ~%. c" "- ~ ',~~ .:.::. .;- ~ " '" ,,'''1 ....:;.. '1";,,, <.r,<,: - - '( 0> '0 l,"!-' ---;;-- .( " !' j , ' .l--_' ;. ,@;-c:;"). . -f _ cD, , I' 1. , . .;~--- --- . - w I\) - I I I L i I . , l .. ~ , "> jj t , r -- , , , I -- - - ~ ,<>- lr, i , , I -t _.l. ! , , . i.::- I .L .... .. ') , { 1"\ I I 1 I . " !< ., ~. :1 :'1 " I I I I . 0' --.:...... ,-- ,,-) '-- \ \ \# "\ ~ 3 <: 'i ~ .. .<) ~~ ~~ ~ :-'.J < J ~ . 1 \ o j '{ 5 1 " 2 1 . C'.' _.. ...;'-",., ._.__...,,", ',~",.,_,"""'_''''''''.':<.-'''ir...","- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Art Nelson September 15, 2000 Page 4 RECOMMENDATIONS Foundation System Design Foundation elements for the proposed single family home and garage should be founded entirely in the compacted fill portion of the subject pad. THE. Soils Company should perform a foundation plan review and a footing inspection, prior to placement of reinforcement to insure the proposed footings do not straddle a cut-to-fill transition. Surface DrainaRe Surface drainage should be directed away from foundations of buildings or appurtenant structures. All drainage should be directed toward streets or approved permanent drainage devices. Where landscaping and planters are proposed adjacent to foundations, subsurface drains should be provided to prevent ponding or saturation offoundations by landscape water. Construction MonitorinR Observation and testing, by THE. Soils Company is essential to verify compliance with recommendations and to confirm that the geotechnical conditions encountered are consistent with the recommendations of this report. THE. Soils Company should conduct construction monitoring, at the following stages of construction: . During excavation offootings for foundations . During fill placement . During utility trench backfill operations . During retaining wall backfill operations LIMITATIONS This report. is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or his representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the project architect and engineer. The project architect or engineer should incorporate such information and recommendations into the plans, and take the necessary steps to see that the contractor and subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field. This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations, and we cannot be responsible for other than our own personnel on the site. Therefore, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the owner ifhe considers any of the recommended actions presented herein to be unsafe. T.H.E. Soils Co. w.O. 084001.22 & '~'._....__..~ "":;:- II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Art Nelson September 15, 2000 Page 5 The findings of this report are valid as of the report date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the fmdings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and revision as changed conditions are identified. SUMMARY Our description of rough grading operations, as well as observations and testing services, are limited to those rough grading operations performed between July 12, 2000 and August 3, 2000. The conclusions and recommendations contained herein have been based upon our observation and testing, as noted. It is our opinion the work performed in the areas denoted has generally been accomplished in accordance with the job specifications and the requirements of the regulating agencies and is suitable for the proposed development. No conclusions or warranties are made for the areas not tested or observed. This report is based on information obtained during rough grading. No warranty as to the current conditions can be made. This report should be considered subject to review by the controlling authorities. This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions, please call. Very truly yours, T.H.E. Soils Company . Fr~y\ ect Geologist J5;.H~ Project Manager J T. einhart, RCE 23464 ivil Engineer, Expires 12-31-01 I.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 1 I I I I I I I I . I I I I I I I I I i I I APPENDIX A References I.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 co II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I REFERENCES H&T Soils Testing, 1998, "Preliminary Soils Investigation and Geotechnical Study" dated September 11, 1998, Job No. F98-51. T.HE Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 '\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX B Laboratory Test Results I.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 \0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I TABLE I Maximum Density/Optimum Moisture % Description Lbs!FtJ Moisture 1 Dark Brown Silty Sand 123.1 11.7 2 Red Brown Sandy Silt 127.4 8.8 I.H.E. Soils Co. W.O. 084001.22 \\ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I APPENDIX C Results of Compaction Tests IRE. Soils Co. W.O. 08400 1.22 \'1/ I I I I I : ' ,_----i' -~- --'jjfj!~q-==--7~~o----=-12~~_~_]j}I=:~~92=:=-:_!~==:=_=SEI~!l::~~_I__ I . 2: '7/13/00' 78.0 '12.1 114.2 93 I . " .___.~___~_ .._,__ .__mm_.__.. __.___m_.____..___ _ .m._.____...~-- .____m_______ ..__ ___._. _ . .... _ ... . 3' '7/13/00 80.0, 10.3 ,111.7! 91 1 " c__________~_.._~________._~_._...~~________.___________ -~.-.-..-- --.- --.-,--..---.-------.- ...-". ------." ---- ----.--.-_. .---- 4! 7113100: 82.0 12.1 113.4. 92 1 " I ;=-==~t=~==_7!i~Z2g:T:_84~==_i:=jJ::4.:=I[1I3=-C9.,O:==:=:j-~:__~_:__::-=-_=~~:- --- - . 6! 7/14/00; 84.0 ' 9.8 ; 112.4 91 I " I - =- 7T---==i~14/0o--1 8!>~i=_:.. - !_~3---]1-I5~5--1 ~'!=_-=:==L~:-=-:~-=-:::~=:;-=:::=. ~~.._~L__ _,-_.?ll4/g.2_J__ 87~g_~__~J_____L~ I_,!~~ ---,_J~_____ ,I :.___ ___. _~____"__ _ __ . '--__~.:..-__--'-}/17/~--L- 88.0 ____---.!.!.:_~~IE.:~__ 92_____!________--~'------- I . 10 : 7/17100 i 88.0 12.3 113.1' 92 1 " C..-::-l} __.__:=.?!17Z~~m~_.s9 :~=-=-~~:~-_=~1 II~I:=~:-9~=_=_-:=~=I=_=_:=:::=:.::-==~==:=-=- Ii 12, '7/17/00: 74.0 ! 10.6 i 110.9 . 90 1 " -------------r---------.-----,---.--------..---- .m. '___'_'_ _.________ _ -- -. ___.u ____ _ _ _ ._ _.'__....__m -.- --.-- ~ 13: ; 7/17/00: 76.0 ; 11.2 ; 111.6 : 91 1 . " . l.._____-<--"_.~____..______:...____.__"'___.___..___._._....L._........_.____.______.....__ _n._n .._ ._u__ __._ ___..__ _. n. ____ _' , J4; . 7/17/00' 78.0 . 12.5 112.8, 92' 1 --" - I IS 7/18100 72.0 11.8' 112.5 91--1------- ---i-~'----- 71WOO -----74.0-- --ii4 --'--111.5----91----- -1----- . -" --;;- __H_ ._ _on. ,..'.' __ ..~...._ .__. __.___._"__._...._._~___..____.___..~_ ______. .. "-"_'~ .....-.- I 17, 7/18/00 76.0 10.7 111.1 90 I _ __ ___.________..___.________. . _____ _,,___ . . H __ __"'__ m _C' _' . _._ 18' 7/18/00 78.0 13.5 111.4 90 I __ ._.____.~..._.__..._..._._.____~____.~_.___.__~__._______h__'~__,__ ....___.__m.. __.. _'._'_"__'0 _..__._..___ .,. ___ __._.___._ ____no___ 19 7/18/00 80.0 12.4 113.7 92 I " I --2~'_ -=_'?!1~(~0 _:_-.~~.O_.______ !I.~___H.:_.106.2~il6~~. _ _ I 20A. 7/19/00 82.0 9.0 112.6 92 1 I .. .,.__m._ -----,- -- -. ...-. -."-- .- '--."-~' .-.. . .-_. . "------.. 21 7/19/00 84.0 11.7 114.9 93 1 - ---22--- ---7/I9IOO..--s6.-6------io9---- 113 ~o ---92- - I" .u U . -'-,--- o. ... .. ..._ . .~.__.___. _nO _.. n_ .__..... . _.___ 1-232~- - - --~ji:~~~--:::~ i~65 - --i~~:~~~6*u i - -. --.- 24 7/19/00 50.0 10.9 114.9 90 2 I 25- 7/19iOO 52.0- -1"1.4 .. --116:4---91 ___mum 2 26 7/19/00 54.0 I\.? 117.3 92 2 I 27 7119100 56.0 12.8 116.0 91 2 28 7/19/00 58.0 13.5 115.5 91 2 29 7119/00 90.0 14.1 115.2 90 2 I 30 7/19/00 91.0 13.6 117.1 92 2 31 7119100 93.0 I\.2 117.6 92 2 I TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTING Job No.084001..22 Nelson Narne: Mariposa Place Date: SEPT ~ T", Elev 1 Moisture Unit Dry ReI. Soil Location No. Date Depth Content Density Comp Type __(f!J____ _J~02____ (PCF) j~L PAD .._----.----_. -----.---.--..,. ----.---...- ___._n._. _.__._____. ._._____~.__._M .,___. " ..--. -.--.-. .~.. " - ..-.- .-. --_.__.... - " " " ..__ u __..~ __ " " " ------ -.....- - " " " " " " " \'? I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Job No.084001..22 TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTING Nelson Name: Mariposa Place Date: SEPT c:J TOO Elev/ Moisture Unit Dry ReI. Soil Location No. Date Depth Content Density :omp Type (ft.) (%) _(~CF) .~) PAD -_.._---~.__.~-'- .- - ---- ._- .-.- .----.. m.__.__.___. __..._ ______.___._.-._..__ m._. __._._~._ ,________ ._-.-.-----~--~- . . . , , ____.__..._..._._..__~.______..__ __"_ _~,.. .,_~__ . __.. .' ,', . ,_ .._ __. .0_ _._._._~ ._,__~,___. _.._____ ," ._____ _ -e'^ _ .__ ._.'__,_..., .......,..._ ___._ __..._'_ ____ ~.... __.. ou., 32 ,7/19/00 95.0 11.7 114.6 93 I " ._----------~-~-----------~-_.._-.-._~.._-_._.__.._---_.._---------_._~--_._--_..._-,+_._._-.._".._--_._---' ..._----- 33, 7/20/00 60.0 12.2. 112.0 91 I " w__..._.."_____ __,__.._ _.. _ ___ '.,,_+ ,.__.'"_.~ ._.. ... '._ ...-.--.------. -"-. -- - -- -.. -~ +--".. . -- -. - .. --_...- -. ," -,- .-. '--.--. .- -- .-' 34, 7/20/00 62.0 13.7 110.8 90 1 " ---35:---.---.7;20/60-.----64~Om-- -12. 6-----l-j1.2 --.--90- ------1--------- ---;,--.. :- .. _.______---,-_________._ __,", _ ._".,_._.___..._ ...m____'_~______.__ _.__. _.._.. __ _ ___.., ___,.__.___ ....______.. ____ ...._' ____._ 0- __ _., -. ,--- ,. 36. . 7/20/00' 65.0 . 11.5 111.6 91 1 ..". f.___n..._____._~_..____u__._~__.___..,_______.___.___...._._..____._______.______.___ _____..____.__n_______..___~__,. ._____._..on...___.., . 37 7/20/00 67.0 j 10.8 111.0' 90 I' ;,,' f.------.----~ .._~. . _ , .. ",__ ___n.._._.,,_____ .._._ _. ...~_ _.._... , .. _ .,.-_~__. -, ___.~___.__.__ '" -"'"- u__.. ,--- n,__.__ .-- - ... ----- --. 38' 7/20/00 69.0 ' 9.8 . 114.9 90 2 " . ---_...----_._-----~-._--_._---_._-'-_.._-_.--~_..-._--------.--.--.......---------,.--,-.---.-- --- .-..-,.--.-.- L_}9 ' _____~/~~~O_O._L_~?~~_____.__l~~~_._____.!~~~_'__..2!_________~~_____.__~_____.. _-.!~:..____"_!~2~/00__"__9_6~_-.--!~:~_._!}}~~2____..._!.~_______..__-=___:__ 41 7/20/00 98.0 11.3 113.3 92 1 " ;--42:----.--772oi6o-...--.-98.0--~--io:9.-1i1:9- ---9.i-----I:------.-~---- . -_.._~ ~_..,..._~...__.._..._...- ---. --_..__.._.._._-_.-~..._--..'--'- - -_._----,~-- ---;-----_.. ----..-----.-.--.-----.----.-..--.--....---- __~:J.___.~__21~I!00 _~___ J~.~_ __.__~L~__~}} ~.~.__.21_ _ ...__!_.. _____.:_"-_. _J__ 44, 7/21/00 72.0 12.8 114.7 93 1: " '.--45 - .... --.-7i21(OO--~-74{)- .. --- -9.6- .-.--112.6--89-.---2:.----.-.---;; -~- .___._......___.0--_.____.-,______.___..___________________..------------------ -.oj ,45A' . 7/21/00 74.0 6.4 115.0 90 2 '" mu____.._____._~_ "." ____ _..... ..._..._....__ _w ._.___.._._.______..._...._.___ - ._. ...._.. "___ __._ ...____u_ ......--.--_...__..._ -" 46 7/21/00 75.0 11.4 116.3 91 2 " ._~_.._-_.- - --.--.-..----- -' .- .,..----.- . .-.. ~ ---.--- -.-. --..... .-.- -- -.-...-..---. -, <--- .-------- --~----, .__j!______712!/00 76:0____}~5_ .ll4..6_, 90 2, " , 48 7/21/00 76.0 10.2 116.1 91 2 ,,- -,-- "_... _.__ ._m"_'~_ ._,____.. _._. _ ._..._..... . ._. _....____._ __... _ -__ - - -.. ------- . .-..-----.--- --. ..~-.-.. --.-..- ~-- - ---~.- --..------_...--~--_..-, 49 7/25/00 92.0 8.9 116.3 91 2 " 50 7/25/00 94.0 9.2 113.7 92 1 " _~ ,__ .~._. __~_. . non. _.__.. . e__ _ _' . ..~_ ~_'e_n ._ _ __ _ . u._. --- --' - - - -.-"-- 51 7/25/00 94.0 11.3 110.8 90 1 " ____._._ __ _....,_. .... ___._.__..___..__ __'__ _..w ._ 52 7/25/00 96.0 12.9 111.1 90 1 ..._'._. _....__.____._.._____ __._._ ___._____.._. __.~.________ _~.__..__ ___..._ _._.. .______.._ .n.._______.______~___.. 53 7/25/00 76.0 I I.7 113.3 92 1 " ,..-. - 54 7/25/00 76.0 10.5 112.6 92 1 __ e'" . ... 55 7/25/00 77.0 9.7 118.3 93 2 .....- .- -.-- 56 7/25/00 79.0 10.8 114.5 90 2 .- -.. -- --- ------ ----.- - ._--.--~--_.-...._.- ---- 57 7/25/00 81.0 12.4 115.2 90 2 " 58 7/25/00 83.0 13.6 115.4 91 2 59 7/25/00 85.0 12.1 115.7 91 2 60 7/26/00 97.0 10.9 114.8 90 2 61 7/26/00 97.0 11.4 117.5 92 2 62 7/26/00 98.0 11.1 117.0 92 2 63 7/26/00 98.0 12.1 115.6 91 2 " " " .. - - ,.'- " " " " " " \~ " I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE I RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTING Job No.084001..22 Nelson Narne: Mariposa Place Date: SEPT Test Test Elev / Moisture Unit Dry ReI. Soil Location No. Date Depth Content Density :omp Type _____on___ ._~ft.~__~L__ j~C~)_ _ (%) PAD -------~-~ ---"~---------' --... ---~--_.._----- 1__..___ ._-i..__..___!_~.__.____~_,_______.l_..______~_________~_____,_...___.._._~____.,_l._..J_.__._m..__...:..____: L_~~____2~~~~0: 98.0 ; 12.7 : 114.8 . 90 2 .... i 65 '7/26/00! 0.0 . 1O.6----rIio~9--~ 90---------~-_on-~-:-----;---:--. '---66;-------7/26/00:--.2. 0-- ---.---io.2--;112.4--91------ i~-'------~---;---- i----67.--:7!26JoQT-4~.-:-11~3u- 1 lli;;-- --91------ -i~----~--;-----"-- -... ...-- C_~I.=~~I:/fj6;O~~--.J.9. q=_;ou._1II~=.! l--1U-_-:=!~__~~=====i~;=__=_L._[=_;~_-::::.: : 69 7/26/00 i 79.0 ; 10.2 [110.7 90 1 .;", ("__.____ _~._."._._~.._~ __.._.._._.." . _.'-____......_--,'__...___._.. - ,. .-t---__.._ .~..--.-.--------._--.-----._-.-... -'-~~' - : 70 · 7/26/00: 87.0 i 12.2 i 117.6 · 92 2: i i .. ! i--'---~ . ).-----..-- i 71 7/26/00 i 89.0 : 13.6 J 119.5 . 94 2: : i .. --72-----r7726!OO1-9i-:O----12~5--11i7.9--93- ----2--------:---;;---- L7~____~28/00 _L.J3 .0__:."--!.Q.9 _.l121J_~~6_______~____.'.__._:..~______ . 74' '7/28/00 i 95.0 ' 10.1 i 116.9 . 92 2 "..' .----75 -'---;7728/00! 97.0 . 12.6--Tl17.T---92....---."2-----'''-----;---,..- ,..---- ---- ---~-.._--_..--_.-.------....~-.----.._--.-.----------.--.-~~.--_._._.---_.._..-._-_.~-,-.--I----_.----_..--.~'-.- ! 76, . 7/28/00 i 99.0 . 10.8 : 115.8 . 91 2 .:" '---78.,,--"~-7ii8ioo! F. G.-'-11~7--Tl.l03--90-~.---1------.-------;;---._-~ -79-- 7/28/00 i FG-'--9-7 ! 1114 90---t-u-----~--:--II---- I .. .:. . -==~~~--~~~~)2~~~0_=:=.F~._=.-~-IX-C_ljT~T-:=~~~:.: .:~-::.~-_._....~.- ..... -_~..- ..----. 81 7/28/00' F.G. 10.5: 116.8 92 2 " ---'82 -- - '-'7/28/00-'--P.O: _u"-i2.4--'--li9~9---94' --- 2 - - u.;, ------ :=.~~j_7i2-8/oo~::=:I~__~=~--io.6----:--11-;T5- "--920--- 2----.n..- - "..'- -.-0 84 7/28/00, 0.0 . 11.4 115.2 90 2 .. _____ ".....__.0.. ._ _ ___ ....:.__._._. .____.___. .. _..... _"'.' _ . ____,___...____ . '.__._....., ___"..__ _.__ __.' _ __.n..___~_ - .-<.--. 85 7/28/00 1.0 11.8 116.4 91 2 _,__,__._.. 0_', '._.__._~ . ._.._~___.__._.____u_._..._.__... .- __ ._....'_.___.~__. -. .....~ -. --- ,-, . ...-. .- -- -. --- ,.... - "., .-- . 86 7/28/00 1.0 10.3 118.5 93 2 .. _._, .._._ .__ _.________.___.__._~__.~_~___.___.~~ ______.~__+--____.______. ~~_ ______w._..__.______._.__._._.___~_~~___.__ ...__ --- 87 8/3/00 0.0 9.8 116.2 91 2 .. --~- - _._...~._.__. ....---..-....--.-. -.-.'.. --. - 88 8/3/00 1.0 13.2 117.2 92 2 .'_.___. __.." ......._..._...__. ..._...._._...___.. ___no _. ..___._..._ .._.__ 89 8/3/00 F.G. 12.7 115.3 91 2 -,.----- -- .. - ..-. -----..---.-.- ..... 90 8/3/00 F.G. 9.7 118.7 93 2 __.___ _ .__. ___..____ __._.._.._.._..--.. ________ __ __ ____._ _.._.__..u. _ 91 8/3/00 F.G. 10.2 114.3 90 2 .. .. .. " " \~