HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract Map 9833-3 Lot 5 Rough Grading
Ear h
echnics
REPORT OF OBSERVATION AND AELD DENSITY TESTING
ROUGH AND FINE GRADING
SINGLE FAMILY PAD
LOT 5, TRACT 9833-3
43394 CALLE DE VELARDO
TEMECULA, CAUFORNIA
APPROVED
arYOP'I'EMBCIJIA
DlPAIaMBNI'OI'rulUCWODs
BY: ~
.
,
~
PROJECT NO. 99209-01
JULY 7,1999
Prepared For:
Mr. Dave Ashby
24795 Shoshone Drive
Murrieta, California 92562
RECEIVED
JUL 26 1999
CITY OF TEME::GULA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Earth Technics P.O. Box 891989, Temecula, California 92589 (909) 699-5451 \
July 7, 1999 Project No. 99209-01
Mr. Dave Ashby
24795 Shoshone Drive
Murrieta, California 92562
SUBJECT: REPORT OF OBSERVATION AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING
ROUGH AND FINE GRADING
Residential Pad
Lot 5, Tract 9833-3
43394 Calle De Velardo
Temecula, Riverside county, California
Gentlemen:
INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of our observation and testing
performed during construction and grading for the residential pad
and access driveway during rough and fine grading of the subject
lot.
,
The pad was constructed northwest end of the Calle de Velardo
cul-de-sac in the Temecula area of Riverside County. The results
of our Field Density Tests obtained during grading are tabulated
in Table I, Results of compaction Tests. The approximate
locations of the tests are shown on the Plot Plan, Plate 1. The
3D-scale As-Graded Grading Plans were prepared by McDermott
Engineering, Murrieta dated July 3, 1999, and were used to plot
our data and guide the grading, along with field staking.
Pro;ect Description
The proposed development consisted cutting the ridge on the north
and northwest portions of the lot and placing fill on the south
and southeast end of the pad. Approximately 4600 yards was
exported to the site to the south to fill a swale area. In
general, the pad required cuts up to 21 feet on the northwest and
fills to 10 feet on the south-southeast. Cut and fill slopes were
constructed at finished inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to
vertical) or flatter. The main house pad was constructed in
transition from cut to fill and overexcavation was performed to
eliminate the transition. The cut slopes and daylight cuts
consist of dense sedimentary bedrock of the pauba Formation that
had no adversely oriented bedding to develop stability problems,
and are stable as constructed. The fill slopes are stable as
constructed, based on high strength values tested by direct
shear. The granular nature of the fill slopes could be easily
eroded and should be planted as soon as possible.
~
.
o
2000
.4000
SCALE
feet
INDEX MAP
"
,
.' ~
.i '/'
. ,
!,t
i,,"
. ~~# f
/~~~o/F "
/.(>..,
,.
./
/~
Y
N
INDEX MAP
OF
LOT 5, TRACT 9833-3
CALLE DE VELARDO
TEMECULA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY
CALIFORNIA
SOURCE: u.s.G.S. 71-, MIN. QUAD. PECHANGA 1988 CPR 1988)
3
99209-01
Page 3
Purpose of Gradinq
The purpose of the grading was to prepare the site for the
proposed construction of the one and two-story single family
residence, and driveway access.
GRADING PROCEDURES
Gradinq Procedures
The site was stripped of the light growth and grasses, in the
areas to receive fill and the pad area, and removed off-site. The
soft soil/colluvium, and alluvium in the swale areas to receive
fill was then overexcavated 1 1/2 - 4 feet or until the dense
underlying sedimentary bedrock was encountered. Fill keys were
necessary as shown on Plate 1. The fill materials were brought to
near optimum moisture utilizing a 5000-gallon water truck when
necessary, and compacted with a large caterpillar D8K bulldozer,
and 823 rubber-tired scraper.
The pad was in transition from cut to fill so the pad was
overexcavated 30 inches and recompacted.
The grading contractor was Mr. Ted Woods of Woods Construction,
Fallbrook.
TESTING
Field Densitv Testinq
Field density testing was performed in accordance with ASTM
D1556-64 (Sand Cone Method). The elevations and the results of
the field density tests are presented in Table I of this report.
The approximate location of the tests are shown on the Grading
Plan, Plate 1.
Maximum Densitv Determinations
Maximum density/optimum moisture determinations were made from
representative samples of on-site soils used in the fill
operations. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D
1557 which consist of compacting 5 equal layers of soil in a 1/30
cubic foot volume mold with 25 blows of a 10 pound hammer falling
18 inches. The results of the Maximum density/optimum
determination are presented herein as Table II, Laboratory Test
Results.
A.
99209-01
Page 4
Expansion Testinq
A finished grade sample was obtained and tested for expansion
utilizing the D.B.C. 29-2 method. The test yielded an expansion
index (E.I.) of 10 which is very low expansion in classification
with the D.B.C. Table 18-1-B. The foundation should have a
minimum of one No. 4 bar top and bottom as reinforcement.
Soluble soil sulfate was 35 ppm allowing normal Type II concrete
with 2500 psi strength.
SUMMARY
Our description of grading and backfill operations, as well as
observations and testing services, were limited to those grading
operations performed between June 1 and 9, 1999. The conclusions
and recommendations contained herein have been based upon our
observation and testing as noted. It is our opinion, that the
work preformed in the areas denoted has generally been
accomplished in accordance with the recommendations of the D.B.C.
Appendix Chapter 33, the Riverside County Grading Code, as
amended by Ordinance No. 457 specifications, and the requirements
of the regulating agencies and is acceptable for its intended
purpose.
No conclusions or warranties are made for areas not tested or
observed. This report should be considered subject to review by
the controlling authorities.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If
you have any questions, please call.
5
99209-01
Page 5
Larry J. Fast
R.C.E. 29150
Registration
WLS/LJF:ss
Distribution:
Attachments:
(4) Addressee
Index Map - Page 2
Appendix A - Laboratory Test Results
Plate 1 (3D-scale) - Grading Plan
Plate 2 - Typical Foundation Design
Table I - Results of Compaction Tests
Table II - Summary of Maximum Density Testing
Cp
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS
(ONE AND TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUilDINGS)
EXPANSION INDEX
0-20
VERY LOW EXPANSION
EXPANSION INDEX
21 - 150
LOW EXPANSION
EXPANSION INDEX
&1 - 80
MEDIUM EXPANSION
EXPANSION INDEX
81 - 130
HIGH EXPANSION
1.ITORY FOOTINGI
ALL FOOTINOI 12 INCHEI
DEE'. FOOTINOI
CONTINUOUI. NO lTEIL
REQUIRED FOR EX'ANSION
FORCEI.
ALL 'OOTINOI 11 INCHES
DUP. FOOTINOI
CONTINUOUI. 1-NO. 4 "'R
TO" AND 10TTOM.
EXTERIOR FOOTINOI 1.
tHCHES DEEII. INTERIOR
FOOTINGS tJ INCHEI DEEII.
1-"0. 4 IAR TOP AND
10TTOM.
EXTEfltoft FOOTINOS 14 tNCHU
DEE". INTERIOR FOOTINOS t2
INCHES DEE,.. t-NO. . IAR TO'
AND 10TTOM.
1-ITOIIlY FOOTINOI
ALL 'OOTINOI tI INCHU
DEE,.. 'OOTINOI
CONTtNUOUI. NO ITEEL
REQUIRED fOR U"ANIION
fORCES.
ALL FOOTINOI tI rNCHEI
DEE,.. FOOTINOI
CONTINUOUS.t.NO, 4 BAR
TO,. AND 10TTOM.
ALL fOOTINGI tl INCHES
DEE,.. FOOTINOI
CONTINUOUI. t-NO. 4 IAR
TO" AND 10TTOM;
EXTERIOR fOOTINGS 24 INCHEI
DEE,.. tNTERIOR fOOTINGI tI
INCI:fES DEEII. t-NO. II IAR TOf'
AND 10TTOM.
GARAOE DOOR GRADE
IUM
NOT REOUIRED.
t2 INCHES DEE,., t-NO. 4 IAft ,. INCHES DEE,.. 1-NO.4 BAft 14 INCHEI DEE,.. 1-NO. II IAft
TOil AND 10TTOM. . TO,. AND 10TTOM. _ TO" AND 10TTOM.
LIVING AMA fLOOR BLAIS . t/2 INCHES THICK. NO MEIH a 112 INCHEI THtCK.. . tl2 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHEI THICK. I X I-I"
REQUIRED fOR EXPANSION I X l.tO/tO WIRE MUH AT I X 1-10/tO WIRE MEIH AT . WIRE-MEIH AT MID-HEIGHT.
fORCES. NO -IAIE REQUlAED. MID-HEIGHT. t INCHES MID-HEIGHT. 4 INCHES - NO. a DOWELLS FROM FOOTING
I MIL VllQUEEN MOISTURE GRAVEL Oft lAND IAIE. I GRAVEL OR lAND IAIE. I TO ILAI AT at INCHEI ON
IARRIER PLUS t INCH lAND, MIL VIIOUEEN MOIITURE MIL VISOUEEN MOIITURE CENTER: 4 INCHES GRO\VEC OLII
IAAlItlER PLUS t INCH lAND, IARRIER IILUS t INCH lAND. lAND lASE, I MIL VIIQUEEN
MOISTURE BARRIER PLUS 1
INCH lAND.
OALIIAOE fLOOR SLAII . 1/2 INCHES THICK. NO ME'H . t/2 INCHEI THICK. ' . tl2 INCHES THICK. 4 INCHEI THICK. I X I-I"
REQUIRED FOR EXPANSION I X I-tO/tO WIRE MEIH OR ' I X 1-10'10 WIRE MESH OR . WIRE MESH OR QUARTER
FORCES. NO IUE REQUIRED. QUARTER ILA.,. JlOLATE QUARTER ILAaI. ISOLATE lUll. ISOLATE FROM ITEM
NO MOlaTUAE IARAIER FROM ITEM WALL FOOTINGS. FROM STEM WALL fOOTINGI. WALL fOOTINOS. 4 INCHES
REQUIRED. 1 INCHEI ROCK, GRAVEL OR 4 INCHEI ROCK, GRAVEL OR ROCK, GRAVEL OR lAND IAIE.
lAND lASE. NO MOISTURE lAND lASE. NO MOISTURE NO MOISTURE IARRtER
IARRIER REQUIRED. IARRIER AEQUIRED. REQUIRED.
,.LIIE.IOAKING OF LIVING NOT REQUIRED. MOISTEN 10AK TO tl INCHES DEPTH 10AK TO t. INCHES oEIITH 10AK TO 24 INCHES DEPTH TO
AftEA AND GARAGE ILo\l PRIOR TO "OURINO TO 4~ AIOVE OPTlMU....' TO ... AIOVE OPTIMUM ... AIOVE O,:"TlMut.II MOISTURE
IOILI CONCRETE. MOISTURE CONTENT. MOISTUAE CONTENT. CONTEN'!.
HOTEl: t) ALL DEPTHI ARE RELATIVE 'TO SLAI IUBOAADE.
I) SPECIAL DElIGN II REQUIAED FOR VEAY HIGHLY EXPANSIVE IOILI.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
VIlOUEEN
"GRAVEL OR lAND IAIE (WHEN REQUIRED)
JOB NO.:
~92.09-01
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
7/9q
DATE:
FIGURE NO.:
PLATE 2
'{EARTHTECHN.CS-
1
TABLE :r
RESULTS OF COMPACTION TESTS.
JOB NO.: 99209-01 ASHBY - 7/7/99
NAME: DATE:
MOISTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. DATE DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY .COMPACTION TYPE
(...) (PCF) (...)
1 6/1/99 1206 9.3 115.9 90.1 A Key 1st lift
2 6/1/99 1208 10.2 118.4 92.5 A Key fill
3 6/1/99 1212 8.8 119.2 92.6 A Alluvial removal 1st
lift
4 6/1/99 1215 9.2 115.0 . 89.4* A Fill Pad
4A 6/2/99 1215 9.8 121.5 94.4 A Fill Pad Retest of
5 6/2/99 1217 9.1 117 .4 91.2 A. Fill Rear Yard
.
6 6/2/99 1216 10.3 119.0 92.4 A Fill Rear Yard'
7 6/2/99 1218 9.2 117.9 91.6 A Fill Pad
8 6/3/99 1219 9.4 118.1 92.3 A Fill Pad-Front
9 6/3/99 1218 10.0 120.5 93.6 A Pad Fill Rear
10 6/4/99 1220 9.5 116.7 90.7 A Pad Finish Rear
. ,
11 6/4/99 1220 8.7 117.6 91.3 A. Pad Finish Front
.12 6/9/99 1220 9.1 118.3 92.5 A Pad Finish
13 6/9/99 1220 8.5 . 120.4 93.5 A Over excavation ,
Finish
--
SEE PLAN FOR TEST LOCATIONS
: ~S.nd Cone ASTMD1558-84 ~-DrIYe Cynnder ABTM 02837-71 !I-Nuclear ASTM 3017-78 .
. **TEST FAILED, SEE RETEST
Esrth Technics
~
TABLE ]I
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
JOB NO. : 99209-01 NAME: ASHBY DATE: 7/7/99
SOIL TYPE CLASSIFICATION . MAXIMUM OPTIMUM
DENSITY IPCFI MOISTURE 1%1
A On-site Silty to clean sand with minor gravel 128.7 10.6
. ,
. . ,
, ,
.' ,
--
q
EARTH TECHNICS
APPENDIX A
\0
..=
li. 5
.
o
en
,
en
Q.
-
~
I
en
en
LaJ
0:
....
en
(!)
z
-
0:
ct.
LaJ I
:I:
en
PROJECT:
ASHBY"
6
4
, ,
3
, "
i
i'
" ,
" I,
, ,
2
, '
. I I .,
I '1..1 I
, I
I,
, ,
I '
, ,
, ,
,
" ,
", I I I
o
o
,
" . I
I 2 3 4 5 6
NORMAL PRESSURE- KIPS / SQ. FT.
EXCAVATION NO. i=-K. DEPTH: o. /'
'KE.MoL.Vs.t> Th 90% REl.tI(D-lE. COM ~l~
SATURATED TEST IN SITU. MOISTURE TEST
rJ = 29
C = 325
.
rJ ·
C =
.
P.S.F
. P.S.F
DIRECT SHEAR TEST DATA
Earth Technics
EXHIBIT
JOB NO.:
99209-D \ DATE: 5f~
\\