HomeMy WebLinkAbout07_001 DH Resolution
DH RESOLUTION NO. 07-001
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA 06-0362, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP WITH A FINAL MAP
WAIVER (TPM 35318) TO ESTABLISH TWELVE LIGHT
INDUSTRIALJOFFICE CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON A 4.4 ACRE
LOT LOCATED AT THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF ROICK
DRIVE AND VIA INDUSTRIA (APN: 909-321-013)
Section 1. Hossein Zomorrodi representing K&S Engineering filed Planning
Application No. PA06-0362, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code.
Section 2. Planning Application No. PA06-0362 was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
Section 3. The Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered Planning
Application No. PA06-0362 on February 8, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed
by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify
either in support or in opposition to this matter.
Section 4. At the 'conclusion of the Director Hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA06-0362 subject to
Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA06-
0362 conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code (Subdivision,
Development Agreement).
Section 5. Findinas. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No.
PA06-0362 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 16.09.140 of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan, and
the City of Temecula Municipal Code.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds that the Tentative Parcel Map No. 35318 is
consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the Municipal Code
because the project meets all applicable design standards and requirements.
B. The Tentative Map does not divide land, which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
The map does not divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the
California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Map.
a,IPlanningl2OO6IPA06-0362 West Poiot Business CenterlPlanningIDH RESOLUTION.doc
1
The proposed development has already been reviewed and approved by City Staff and
the Planning Commission. The project proposes to split each building into a
condominium for separate ownership purposes.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions
of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially
and avoidably injure fish or wildlife in their habitat.
The proposed project will not subdivide any portions of land, there will be no significant
environmental damage caused as a result of the project.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
The building has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Department and the
Department of Public Works. As a result, the project was conditioned to address their
concerns. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan and the Development Code
to ensure that the public health, safety, and welfare are safeguarded. This project is
consistent with these documents.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
A Development Plan and building plans have been designed and approved for this site.
To the extent feasible, the development plans and building plans allow for future
passive or natural heating or cooling oppoitunities. The proposed map will not alter the
approved design of the development plan or the buildings.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which area
substantially equivalent to these previously acquired by the public will be provided.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Development Plan
for the West Pointe Business Center. The City has reviewed and approved these
easements and has found no potential conflicts.
H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
(Quimby).
The Development Plan was conditioned to provide QUIMBY fees prior to issuance of
building permits.
Section 6. Environmental Comoliance. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt
from further environmental review. (Class 15, Minor Land Divisions, Section 15315)
Section 7. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Director of Planning hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA06-0362, A Tentative Parcel Map with a Final Map Waiver
G:\P!mning\2006\PA06-0362 West Point Business Center\PIanning\DH RESOLUTION.doc
2
to establish twelve light industrial/office condominium units with the West Pointe Business
Center as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 8. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Director
of Planning this 8th of February, 2007.
7kh0J<- - ~ ~
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
I, Kathy Simpkins, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that
DH Resolution No. 07-001 was duly and regularly adopted by the Director of Planning of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th of February, 2007.
~f'~~'
K hy Sin-qskins;- retary'
J
a,IPlanningl2OO6IPA06-0362 West Point Business CenterlPlanningIDH RESOLUTION.doc
3