HomeMy WebLinkAboutGeotechRoughGrading(Feb.7,1997)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I PETRA GEOTECHNICAL, INC.
27620 Commerce Centre Drive
Suite 103
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: 19D9) 699-6193
Fax: (909) 699-6197
I
. PEliRA
COSTA MESA' NEWPORT BEACH' SAN DIEGO' TEMECULA
February 7, 1997
J.N, 474-96
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INe.
2010 Main Street, Suite 960
Irvine, California 92714
Attention:
Mr, Charlie Kluger
Subject:
Geotechnical Report of Rough Grading and Post-Grading During
Sewer Line Backfilling Operations, Tracts 23100-4 and 23101-3,
City of Temecula, Riverside County, California
Submitted herewith is a summary of the geotechnical observation and testing services
provided by Petra Geotechnical, Inc, (Petra) during grading operations within the
subject tracts, Conclusions and recommendations relative to the suitability of the
grading forthe proposed developmentare presented.... .
REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
All fills, removals and processing of original ground under the purview of this report
have been completed under the observation and with selective testing by Petra, and are
found to be in compliance with the grading code of the County of Riverside and the
City of Temecula, California, The completed work has been reviewed and is
considered adequate for the construction now planned,
On the basis of our findings, the following recommendations were prepared in
conformance with generally accepted professional engineering practices and no further
warranty is implied or made,
SUMMARY OF GRADING OPERATIONS
I. The purpose of the grading operation was to develop a 15:t-foot-wide, primarily
level-graded access road to accommodate construction of an 8-inch-diameter
sewer line through the site, as shown on the accompanying geotechnical maps (in
pockets)
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Sewer Line Backfill/ Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N. 474-96
Page 2
2. Earthwork operations were conducted in essentially three phases, The first phase
consisted of the rough-grading of a 15:t-foot-wide access road through the site
to the general configuration shown on the accompanying grading plans, This area
was left approximately 2 feet below the final grades during this phase of grading,
The second phase included construction of the sewer line and testing of the
backfill soils on a full-time basis, The third phase consisted of completing the
placement of the final 2 feet of fill soils, subgrade compaction and placement of
4 inches of base over the entire alignment, Additionally, the fill slopes were
trimmed back to achieve the design grades,
3, Grading of the entire alignment began on November I, 1996, and was completed
on February 6, 1997, Rough grading was conducted by WA Guthridge ofY orba
Linda, California, and the sewer line was constructed by Southern California
Pipeline of Tustin, California,
4, An existing active 24-inch reclaimed water line was encountered just southeast of
the intersection ofParducci Lane and Promenade Chardonnay Hills. The actual
location of this water line, where it encroached into the sewer-line alignment, was
from Stations 54+00 to 54+70, as indicated on the sewer and water plans,
Removal of alluvial soils was conducted to within approximately 10 feet of this
line based on the locations identified by Underground Service Alert in the field,
Porous alluvial soils were observed underlying this water line, but were not
removed due to the potential for damaging the line, The approximate location of
the 24-inch water transmission line and limits of alluvial removals are shown on
the accompanying geotechnical maps,
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
General
Geologic conditions exposed during the process of grading were frequently observed
by our geologic staff, A California Certified Engineering Geologist observed and
approved all removal bottoms prior to fill placement.
Geolol!:ic Units
Bedrock materials exposed within the cut areas of the streets and slopes consist of the
Pauba Formation bedrock (map symbol Qps), This material consists of massive to
crudely bedded silty sand which is medium dense to dense,
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INe.
Sewer Line Backfill/ Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7,1997
J.N, 474-96
Page 3
Adverse geologic conditions, such as faults or landslides, were not observed within the
area of grading,
Cut Slopes
All temporary cut slopes ranging from 8 to 46 feet high and inclined at a 2: I (horizontal
to vertical [H: V]) gradient, are considered grossly stable and will remain so under
normal conditions and maintenance, Cut slopes in Pauba Formation bedrock tend to
erode during periods of significant rainfall. Proper slope maintenance should be
provided to mitigate excessive erosion to the slopes,
SOILS ENGINEERING
Preparation of Existinl!: Ground
I. All weeds, grasses and similar organic materials were stripped and removed from
the site prior to grading,
2. All loose, excessively wet and compressible topsoil, slopewash, alluvial and
colluvial materials were removed to competent material prior to placing fill,
Removal depths varied from 2 to 12 feet and were conducted to the toe-of-slope,
as shown on the accompanying geotechnical maps.
3, Areas to receive fill were scarified and bladed to a depth of 6 to 8 inches, watered
and mixed, as required, to achieve optimum moisture conditions, and were
compacted to a minimum relative compaction of90 percent of the maximum dry
density as determined by ASTM D1557-91.
4, T oe-of-fill slope keys having a minimum width of 15 feet were placed at the base
of all fill slopes, Fill keys were excavated into competent native material with a
minimum slope of 2 percent to the heel of the key,
Temporary Fill Slone Construction
Temporary fill slopes ranged from 2 to 20 feet high at a 2:1 (H:V) gradient, were
overfilled and backrolled every 4 to 5 feet with a sheepsfoot roller pulled by a rubber-
tired dozer. Slopes were track-walked with the dozer and then trimmed back to the
~
.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Sewer Line Backfill/ Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N. 474-96
Page 4
compacted inner core, All temporary fill slopes are considered grossly stable under
normal conditions.
Laboratorv Testinl!:
The laboratory maximum dry density and optimum moisture content for each major soil
type were determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1557-91. Table I
(below) presents the pertinent test values,
TABLE I
Optimum
Maximum Dry Moisture
Sample Soil Description Density Content
(ocf) (%)
I Dark brown, silty fme to coarse SAND 131.0 7.5
1A Light brown to gray SILT with Sand 128,0 10,0
2A Light brown Silty SAND fill(?) 128,0 10,0
3 Medium brown, clayey, fine to medium 133.0 8.0
SAND
3A Brown silty SAND mix with gray fme Silt 127,0 10,0
4 Dark brown, clayey, fme to medium 131.0 9,0
SAND; Silt
4A Red brown, silty, fine to coarse SAND 127,0 10.0
with Clay
5 Olive tan, silty, fine SAND 124.5 10.5
SA Dark brown to black Silty SAND 132,0 8.0
6 Olive tan, fine t coarse SAND; Clay 129,0 8.5
6A Red brown, silty, fme, fme to coarse 128.0 10,0
SAND
8 Medium brown, fine to coarse SAND; Silt 134,0 8,0
13 Orangish brown, clayey, medium to 130,5 8.5
coarse SAND
15 Orangish brown, sandy CLAY with Silt 129,0 9,5
.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Sewer Line Backfill! Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N, 474-96
Page 5
Optimum
Maximum Dry Moisture
Sample Soil Description Density Content
(pcf) (%)
16 Orange brown, fme to medium SAND 126,0 10.5
with Clay
17 Medium brown, silty, medium to coarse 128,0 11.5
SAND
19 Medium brown, medium to coarse SAND 130,0 8,0
with Gravel
AB1 Processed miscellaneous base 128,5 7.5
AB2 Processed miscellaneous base 139,0 6.5
Fill Placement
I. Fill consisted of onsite materials having the above-mentioned soil classifications,
Fill materials were placed in lifts restricted to 6 inches in thickness, watered, as
required, to achieve optimum moisture conditions and were compacted to a
minimum relative compaction of 90 percent of the maximum dry density as
determined by ASTM Dl557-91.
2. Maximum depth offill is approximately 26 feet.
3, Fill placed on surface having a slope gradient steeper than 5: 1 (H: V) were keyed
and benched into compacted materials or dense native soils,
Field Testinl!
I. Field density tests were performed using the nuclear gauge method (ASTM
D2922-91) and the sand cone method (ASTM DI556-82), Test results are shown
in Table II (attached), The approximate locations of the field density tests are
shown on the accompanying geotechnical maps,
2, Field density tests were taken at sufficient intervals to determine that adequate
compaction was being achieve, Where tests indicated inadequate compaction, the
areas were reworked and retested,
3. Visual classification of earth materials in the field was the basis for determining
which maximum density value to employ for a given density test, Frequent one-
point checks were performed to supplement visual classifications.
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Sewer Line Backfill! Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN. 474-96
Page 6
UTILITY TRENCHES
Onsite soils generally consisted of silty sands and required mechanical effort to achieve
proper compaction, All backfill for the sewer line was compacted to a minimum
relative compaction of 90 percent ofthe maximum dry density as determined by ASTM
Dl557-91.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
All fill soils tested ultimately met the minimum relative compaction requirement of 90
percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557-91.
Since all slopes constructed during this phase of grading are considered temporary, it
is our understanding that slope landscaping will not be provided, Due to the potential
for erosion on fill slopes and cut slopes derived from the Pauba Formation, rain water
should not be allowed to overtop slopes,
Minor settlement may occur along the alignment between Stations 54+00 and 54+70
where porous alluvial soils were left in-place under the existing 24-inch water
transmission line, This potential settlement is not expected to adversely impact the
sewer line which was constructed in competent soils approximately 4 feet below the
existing water line, During future phases of grading, this existing water transmission
line may need to be relocated, At this time, the alluvial soils left in-place below and
within approximately 10 feet of this pipe should be removed and replaced with
compacted fill soils.
Additional Considerations
The project soils engineer shall be notified prior to fill placement regarding the site or
backfilling of trenches after rough grading has been completed, Additionally, Petra
should be notified to conduct footing excavation observation under slab-trench
'"
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
eeL CONSTRUCTION, lNe.
Sewer Line Backfill/ Tracts 23100-4 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN, 474-96
Page 7
compaction testing and testing of driveways, drive approaches, city sidewalks and
utility hookups,
This report is subject to review by the controlling authorities for the project,
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service, If you have any questions, please
contact this office at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
fl ~:p'
Mark Bergmann
Senior Associate Geolo
CEG 1348
MB/TL/SJ/keb
Attachments: Table II - Results ofField Density Tests
Geotechnical Maps -- Plates I through 5 (in pocket)
Distribution: (6)
Addressee
1
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
eCL CONSTRUCflON, INe.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J,N,474-96
Page Tll-l
TABLE 11
Results of Field Density Tests
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cu ft (%)
11/0 I/96 1 Culbertson Lane 1212 14.9 1147 90 1A
11/01/96 2 Culbertson Lane 1213 114 115.7 90 6
11/01/96 3 Culbertson Lane 1208 9.0 118,3 91 19
11/01/96 4 Culbertson Lane 1209 11.0 118.7 91 19
11/04/96 5 Culbertson Lane 1219 8,2 116.2 90 6
11/04/96 6 Culbertson Lane 1220 8.8 115,6 90 6
11/04/96 7 Culbertson Lane 1215 10.2 119.6 91 1
11/04/96 8 Culbertson Lane 1216 94 117,7 91 19
11/04/96 9 Promenade 1206 84 114.3 89** 17
Chardonnay
11/04/96 10 Promenade 1209 13.7 114.5 91** 16
Charonnay
11/04/96 11 Culbertson Lane 1218 9.8 122.1 91 8
11/04/96 12 Culbertson Lane 1219 11.7 119.3 90 I
11/04/96 13 Culbertson Lane 1222 10.3 121.3 91 8
11/04/96 14 Culbertson Lane ]223 11.7 1205 90 8
11/04/96 15 Culbertson Lane 1224 9.1 121.7 91 8
11/04196 16 Culbertson Lane 1225 104 123.9 92 8
11/04/96 17 Culbertson Lane 1221 9.9 113,1 88* 1A
11/04/96 18 Culbertson Lane 1222 9.9 112.3 88* lA
11/05/96 19 Promenade 1212 9.0 114.8 90 ]A
Chardonnay
11/05/96 20 Promenade 1213 12,6 105.5 85* 5
Chardonnay
11/05/96 21 Promenade Retest #20 12.5 111.7 87* lA
Chardonnay
11/05/96 22 Promenade 1211 12.7 Iln 89* lA
Chardonnay
Notes:
* Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
** Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggrcgate Base
Subgrade
8
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN. 474-96
Page Tll-2
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNITWT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) lbs/cuft (%)
11105/96 23 Promenade 1212 11.3 114.8 90 IA
Chardonnay
11/05/96 24 Promenade Retest #22 8.9 1117 90 5
Chardonnay
11/05/96 25 Promenade Retest #21 8,9 111.8 90 5
Chardonnay
11/05/96 26 Promenade 1215 122 119.2 91 I
Chardonnay
11/05/96 27 Promenade 1216 11.6 112.2 87' IA
Chardonnay
11/05/96 28 Promenade Retest #27 11.3 114.8 90 lA
Chardonnay
11105/96 29 Promenade 1214 7.5 118,8 91 1
Chardonnay
11105/96 30 Promenade 1215 10.6 115.1 90 IA
Chardonnay
11105/96 31 Promenade 1225 8.1 114.1 89' lA
Chardonnay
11/05/96 32 Promenade Retest #31 8.1 114.7 90 lA
Chardonnay
11/06/96 33 Promenade 1218 11.1 116.4 90 15
Chardonnay
11/06/96 34 Promenade 1219 10.0 114.7 90 lA
Chardonnay
11/06/96 35 Promenade 1218 10.1 116,7 91 lA
Chardonnay
11106/96 36 Promenade 1218 14.4 117.1 91 15
Chardonnay
11106/96 37 Promenade 1219 12.9 117,8 91 15
Chardonnay
11/06/96 38 Promenade 1221 6.0 121.5 91 8
Chardonnay
11106/96 39 Promenade 1222 11.0 120.4 90 8
Chardonnay
Notes:
, Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
" Test Taken in Native
S Sewer line SG
AB Aggregate Base
Subgrade
<\
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
j,N.474-96
Page TIl-3
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibslcu ft (%)
11106/96 40 Promenade 1220 12,6 122.3 91 8
Chardonnay
11106/96 41 Promenade 1221 12.6 117,5 90 1
Chardonnay
11/06/96 42 Culbertson Lane Retest # 1 7 10.8 123.0 92 8
11/06/96 43 Culbertson Lane Retest # 18 10.9 122,8 92 8
11/06/96 44 Culbertson Lane 1224 10.2 123.6 92 8
11/06/96 45 Culbertson Lane 1223 13.9 112.3 88' 3A
11/06/96 46 Culbertson Lane 1224 11.6 113.6 89' 3A
11107/96 47 Culbertson Lane Retest #46 12.4 116.3 91 3A
11/07/96 48 Culbertson Lane Retest #45 11.8 125.0 93 8
11107/96 49 Culbertson Lane 1226 10.0 1170 91 2A
11/07/96 50 Culbertson Lane 1227 12.9 ] ]5.1 90 2A
11/07/96 51 Culbertson Lane 1226 10.6 115.2 90 2A
11107/96 52 Culbertson Lane 1227 11.2 117.3 92 2A
11/07/96 53 Culbertson Lane 1223 10.1 115,9 91 2A
11107/96 54 Culbertson Lane 1224 10,6 114.8 90 2A
11/07/96 55 Culbertson Lane 1225 10.4 116.8 91 15
11/07/96 56 Culbertson Lane 1224 10.2 120,3 92 1
11/08/96 57 Culbertson Lane 1226 13.4 120.1 92 1
11/08/96 58 Culbertson Lane 1227 14.4 118.7 93 17
11108/96 59 Culbertson Lane 1228 11.6 113.3 91 5
11108/96 60 Culbertson Lane ]229 12.1 111.7 90 5
11108/96 61 Culbertson Lane 1230 11.6 114.8 90 17
11/08/96 62 Culbertson Lane 1220 12.1 112,7 88' 2A
11108/96 63 Culbertson Lane 1221 12.0 1141 90 3A
11108/96 64 Culbertson Lane Retest #62 13.4 116.6 90 15
11108/96 65 Culbertson Lane 1222 12.7 116.0 90 15
Notes:
· Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
.. Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Sub grade
\0
.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page Tll-4
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cuft (%)
11/08/96 66 Culbertson Lane 1223 11.7 117,0 91 15
11108/96 67 Promenade 1216 11.3 105.3 85' 5
Chardonnay
11/08/96 68 Promenade Retest #67 13.1 112.5 88' 2A
Chardonnay
11/08/96 69 Promenade Retest #68 12.2 118.8 92 15
Chardonnay
11/08/96 70 Promenade 1219 10.0 120.1 92 13
Chardonnay
11/08/96 71 Promenade 1220 10.2 120] 92 13
Chardonnay
11109/96 72 Promenade 1221 11.7 117,6 90 4
Chardonnay
] 1/09/96 73 Promenade 1223 9.6 124.0 93 8
Chardonnay
11/09/96 74 Promenade 1224 9.4 123,8 92 8
Chardonnay
11/09/96 75 Culbertson Lane 1222 9.6 122.2 91 8
11/09/96 76 Culbertson Lane 1223 11.1 119.3 90 3
11/12/96 77 Culbertson Lane 1224 10.5 122,0 91 8
11112/96 78 Culbertson Lane 1225 10.7 1175 90 1
11/12/96 79 Culbertson Lane 1227 12,8 114.6 90 4A
11/12/96 80 Culbertson Lane 1228 14.0 115.5 90 2A
11/12/96 81 Culbertson Lane ]226 12,3 110.8 87' 4A
11/12/96 82 Culbertson Lane 1228 11.7 113,5 89' 4A
11/12/96 83 Culbertson Lane 1226 13,2 117.3 92 2A
11112/96 84 Culbertson Lane 1227 12.2 117.2 92 4A
11/12/96 85 Culbertson Lane 1229 11.9 117.8 90 1
11/12/96 86 Culbertson Lane 1230 12,8 113.8 90 4A
11/12/96 87 Culbertson Lane Retest #81 106 109.6 86' 4A
11/12/96 88 Culbertson Lane Retest #82 11.3 107.6 85* 4A
Notes:
* Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
** Test Taken in Native
S Sewer line 5G
AB Aggregate Base
Subgrade
\\
tti
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7,1997
IN. 474-96
Page TIl-5
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cu ft (%)
1 ] 112/96 89 Culbertson Lane Retest #87 14,1 117,2 92 2A
11112/96 90 Culbertson Lane Retest #88 12.2 114.3 90 2A
11/13/96 91 Culbertson Lane 1228 11.6 113 ] 89' 4A
11/13/96 92 Culbertson Lane 1229 12,1 105.5 83' 4A
11113/96 93 Culbertson Lane 1230 121 110.9 87' 4A
11/13/96 94 Culbertson Lane 1231 12.0 108.3 85' 4A
11/13/96 95 Culbertson Lane 1230 13.5 118.2 92 2A
11/13/96 96 Culbertson Lane 123] 12.2 1]4.3 90 2A
1lI13/96 97 Culbertson Lane Retest #91 13.4 114.4 90 4A
11/13/96 98 Culbertson Lane Retest #92 13.5 115.2 92 2A
11/13/96 99 Culbertson Lane Retest #93 11.01 108.8 86' 4A
11113/96 100 Culbertson Lane Retest #94 9.0 111.7 88' 4A
11/13/96 101 Culbertson Lane Retest #99 112 111.9 88' 4A
11113/96 102 Culbertson Lane Retest # 100 9.9 114.0 90 4A
11/13/96 103 Culbertson Lane Retest # 10 1 11.4 115.7 90 2A
11113/96 104 Culbertson Lane 1231 11.1 113.8 90 4A
11113/96 105 Culbertson Lane 1228 11.6 115.9 91 2A
11/13/96 106 Culbertson Lane 1229 11.0 113.3 89' 4A
11113/96 107 Culbertson Lane Retest # 1 06 12,2 114.3 90 4A
11/13/96 108 Promenade 1236 12.4 119.1 90 SA
Chardonnay
11/14/96 109 Culbertson Lane 1231 13.7 116.3 90 15
11114/96 110 Culbertson Lane 1232 12.7 1179 90 4
11/14/96 11] Culbertson Lane 1230 13.4 II5,7 90 15
11/14/96 112 Culbertson Lane 1231 12,3 121.0 92 5A
11/14/96 113 Promenade 1238 12.1 119.2 90 SA
Chardonnay
11/14/96 114 Promenade 1239 10.7 119.2 90 SA
Chardonnay
Notes:
, Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
" Test Taken in Native
S Sewer line SG
AB Aggregate Base
Sub grade
\z"
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
~RACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN. 474-96
Page TII-6
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO, LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WI COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cuft (%)
] l/14/96 115 Culbertson Lane 1233 14.4 111.1 87' 4A
11114/96 116 Culbertson Lane Retest #115 11.3 114.8 90 2A
11114/96 117 Culbertson Lane 1231 12.1 116,0 91 2A
11114/96 118 Culbertson Lane 1232 13,5 114.3 90 4A
ll/lS/96 119 Culbertson Lane 1229 12.4 113,2 88' 6A
11115/96 120 Culbertson Lane Retest #119 10.9 116.3 91 6A
1l/IS/96 121 Culbertson Lane 1231 14,1 117.0 91 6A
11115/96 122 Culbertson Lane 1232 10.1 118.8 93 6A
11115/96 ]23 Culbertson Lane 1234 14.6 115.0 90 6A
11115/96 124 Culbertson Lane 1235 13.9 119.2 93 6A
11115/96 125 Culbertson Lane 1233 15,3 113.4 86' 5A
11115/96 126 Culbertson Lane 1234 13.0 120.0 91 5A
11115/96 127 Culbertson Lane 1235 11.1 118.6 90 SA
11115/96 128 Culbertson Lane 1237 12.2 120.1 91 5A
11115/96 129 Culbertson Lane Retest #125 13.7 1200 91 SA
11118/96 130 Promenade 1238 14.1 113.8 90 4A
Chardonnay
11118/96 131 Promenade 1231 101 113.8 88' 6A
Chardonnay
11118/96 132 Promenade 1232 10.4 113.4 89' 6A
Chardonnay
11118/96 133 Promenade Retest #131 13.2 112.8 88' 6A
Chardonnay
11118/96 134 Promenade Retest #132 10.7 118.1 90 1
Chardonnay
11118/96 135 Promenade 1227 11.5 115.6 90 6A
Chardonnay
11118/96 136 Promenade 1228 9,7 112.8 90 16
Chardonnay
11118/96 137 Promenade 1223 12,5 1212 92 SA
Chardonnay
Notes:
, Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
" Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Subgrade
\?
&
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page TIl-7
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO, LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) ('Yo) Ibs/cuft ('Yo)
] 1/18/96 138 Promenade ]225 12.4 116,8 9] 6A
Chardonnay
I III 8/96 ]39 Promenade Retest #133 10.3 110.8 87' 6A
Chardonnay
11/18/96 140 Promenade Restest #139 10.4 112 ] 88' 6A
Chardonnay
1 III 8/96 141 Promenade Retest #] 40 10.9 109.8 86' 4A
Chardonnay
1]/18/96 ]42 Promenade 1233 13,2 1] 1.1 87' 4A
Chardonnay
I II18/96 143 Promenade Retest #]41 13.4 121.5 92 SA
Chardonnay
1]/18/96 144 Promenade Retest #142 10] 113.8 90 4A
Chardonnay
1 III 8/96 145 Culbertson Lane ]239 11.0 122.8 92 8
] II18/96 ]46 Culbertson Lane 1240 9.4 ]20.5 90 8
11/18/96 147 Culbertson Lane 1247 8.5 126,1 94 8
11/18/96 148 Culbertson Lane 1248 14.1 113.3 90 16
11/19/96 149 Promenade 1237 9,0 118.6 90 SA
Chardonnay
11/19/96 150 Promenade 1239 10.4 115.3 90 6A
Chardonnay
11/19/96 151 Promenade 1231 12,7 115,6 90 6A
Chardonnay
11/19/96 152 Promenade 1232 ]2.7 115.1 90 6A
Chardonnay
11/19/96 153 Promenade 1243 11.5 1 ]3.8 90 4A
Chardonnay
11/19/96 154 Promenade 1245 11.0 118.8 90 SA
Chardonnay
11/19/96 155 Promenade 1247 9,2 117.0 91 6A
Chardonnay
Promenade
Chardonnay
Notes:
. Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
" Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Subgrade
v\
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
€CL CONSTRUCfION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN. 474-96
Page Tll-8
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) lbs/cuft (%)
11/27/96 IS Promenade 1235 13.9 115.0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 53+11
11/27/96 2S Promenade 1237 13.0 117.25 91 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 53+07 ,
11/27/96 3S Promenade 1239 13.4 112,0 88' 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 53+03
11/27/96 4S Promenade Retest #3S 15.4 113.9 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 53+03
11/27/96 5S Promenade 1230 14.0 114.0 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 53+93
11/27/96 6S Promenade 1238.5 13,5 115.0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 51+73
11/27/96 7S Promenade 1246 8.7 114.0 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 51+10
11/27/96 8S Promenade 1241 16.2 108,0 85' 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+80
11/27/96 9S Promenade Retest #8S 17,1 108,9 86' 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+80
11/27/96 10S Promenade Retest #9S 14,0 111.0 87' 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+80
11/27/96 lIS Promenade Retest # IOS 14.0 114.5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+84
11/27/96 12S Promenade 1243 14.5 114.5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+85
Notes:
, Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
" Test Takcn in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Sub grade
\?'
~
~
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page Tll-9
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNITWT COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibslcu ft (%)
11/29/96 l3S Promenade 1246 11.7 115.0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+70
11/29/96 14S Promenade 1248 10.2 117.5 92 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+45 ,
11/29/96 15S Promenade 1250 11.5 109.0 86" 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+85
1 1/29/96 16S Promenade Retest #15S 12,3 118.0 93 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+85
11/29/96 17S Promenade 1242 13.8 110.25 87" 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49-Kl9
11/29/96 l8S Promenade Retest #17S 14.2 109,0 86" 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49-Kl9
11/29/96 19S Promenade Retest #18S 10.7 119.25 94 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 49-Kl9
11/29/96 20S Promenade 1245 12,6 117.25 92 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 48+96
11/29/96 21S Promenade 1245 11.9 114.0 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 48+70
11/29/96 22S Promenade 1251 13.0 1105 87" 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 48+46
12/02/96 23S Promenade 1241 9.5 121.0 92 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 51+49
12/02/96 24S Promenade 1248 9.2 120.0 91 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 51+49
Notes:
" Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
"" Test Taken in Native
S
AB
Sewerline SG
Aggregate Base
Sub grade
\(,
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page Tll-lO
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cu ft (%)
12/03/96 25S Promenade Retest #22S 10.0 115.0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 48+46
12/03/96 26S Promenade 1249 8.9 114,5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 48+46
12/03/96 27S Promenade 1246 112 113.75 90 3A
Chardonnay ,
Sta 48+21
12/03/96 28S Promenade 1249.5 10,8 122.25 92 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 46+97
12/03/96 29S Promenade 1248.5 10.9 121.75 92 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 46+94
12/03/96 30S Promenade 1253.5 9.2 125,0 95 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 47+20
12/03/96 31S Promenade 1251.5 12.6 119.5 91 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 47+04
12/05/96 32S Promenade 1242 8,0 114.3 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 52+71
12/05/96 33S Promenade 1247 9.0 114,5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta5I+24
12/05/96 34S Promenade 1250 8.0 113,6 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 50+37
12/05/96 35S Promenade 1250 11.0 115.8 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 49+42
12105/96 36S Promenade 1253.5 12.0 117.3 90 2A
ChardOlUlay
Sta 48+19
Notes:
· Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
.. Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Subgrade
\1
.
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfION,INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page Tll-Il
DATE OF TEST RELA TlVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEV A TlON MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cuft (%)
12/05/96 37S Promenade 1255 13.0 116,8 91 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 47+47
12/05/96 38S Promenade 1255 10.7 112.0 88* 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 45+70
12/05/96 39S Promenade 1257 11.8 114.5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 45-t{j0
12/05/96 40S Promenade 1259 10.8 ] 15.5 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 45+50
12/05/96 41S Promenade Retest #38S 10,6 117.5 92 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 45+70
12/05/96 42S Promenade 1253 12.8 119.25 93 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 45+75
12/06/96 43S Promenade 1253 10,5 114,0 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 43+28
12106/96 44S Promenade 1257 11.8 114.5 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 43+41
12/06196 45S Promenade 1262 11.2 115.5 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 43+54
12/06/96 46S Promenade 1264 104 115.0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 43+43
12/06/96 47S Promenade 1266 ]0,3 116.0 91 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 42+96
12/06/96 48S Promenade 1263 9.3 118.5 93 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 42+96
Notes:
" Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
** Test Taken in Native
S
AB
Sewer line SG
Aggregate Base
Subgrade
\"b
~
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 &23101-3
February 7, 1997
],N.474-96
Page Tll-12
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cuft (%)
12/06/96 49S Promenade 1268 13,5 114.0 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 43+43
12106/96 50S Promenade 1262 124 115,9 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 42+96
12/l 0/96 51S Promenade 1257 15.6 115.5 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 42-t{)6
12/10/96 52S Promenade 1262 12.5 114.25 90 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 42+11
12/24/96 53S Promenade 1223 17.3 107.0 84* 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 58-Hi2
12/24/96 54S Promenade Retest #53S 13.4 115.5 91 3A
Chardonnay
Sta 58+58
12/24/96 55S Promenade 1224 14.5 115.75 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 58-t{)8
12/27/96 56S Promenade 1227 10.5 129.0 98 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 57-t{)3
12/26/96 57S Promenade 1226.5 11.7 116.0 91 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 56+20
12/31/96 58S Open Space 105 1220.5 14,9 126.2 96 5A
Sta 7+50
12/3 1/96 59S Open Space 105 1227 14.3 120.1 94 2A
Sta 9+46
12/3 1/96 60S Promenade 1224 11.7 116.9 91 2A
Chardonnay Sta 9+95
12/31/96 6lS Culbertson Sta 1+35 1229 15.6 128.0 90 2A
12/31/96 62S Open Space 105 1216,5 16.3 128.0 95 2A
Sta 7+50
Notes:
,* Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
,** Test Taken in Native
S
AB
Sewerline SG
Aggregate Base
Subgrade
\C\,
~
~
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfl0N, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN,474-96
Page T11-13
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cu ft (%)
12/3 1/96 63S E. Of Meadows Pl,.-wy 1215 14.9 128.0 92 2A
Sta 5+50
01/02/97 64S Promenade 1226 14.3 128,0 90 2A
Chardonnay
Sta 55+45
01/25/97 68S Promenade 1230 9.3 124.1 94 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
No 23 Sta 54+47
01/25/97 69S Promenade 1232 9.8 123.1 93 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
#23 Sta 54+55
01/25/97 70S Promenade 123] 10.8 123.0 93 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
#2 Sta 58+85
01/25/97 7lS Promenade 1233 12.5 ]21.5 92 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
No, 2 Sta 58+95
01/25/97 72S Promenade 1235 ]2,5 120,7 91 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
#2 Sta 58+85
01/25/97 73S Promenade 1238 12,1 120,3 91 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
#2 Sta 58+95
01/25/97 74S Promenade 1240 12.8 119.0 90 5A
ChardonnaylManhole
#2 Sta 58+85
01/27/97 75S Promenade ]23] 14.5 119.2 90 5A
ChardonnaylMain
Sta 54+70
01/27/97 76S Promenade ]233 14.0 lIS,5 90 5A
ChardonnaylMain
Sta 54+70
01/27/97 77S Meadows Parkwayl ]213.5 13.7 118.3 90 5A
Manhole #24
Sta 09+95
01/27/97 78S Meadows Parkwayl 1214 13.6 118.6 90 5A
Manhole #25
Sta 09+95
Notes:
* Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
** Test Taken in Native
S
AB
Sewerline SG
Aggregate Base
Sub grade
zP
.
~
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCfION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
IN. 474-96
Page Tll-14
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT. COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cuft (%)
01/30/97 79S Promenade 1272 11.8 120.2 91 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 42-K50 .
01/30/97 80S Promenade 1266 103 122.3 93 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 44+90
01/3l/97 81S Promenade 1256 12.4 119.3 90 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 47+90
0l/3l/97 82S Promenade 1251 11.4 122.5 93 5A
ChardolUlay
Sta 50+80
01/31/97 83S Promenade 1241.5 9.7 123.0 93 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 53+70
o l/3l/97 84S Promenade 1233 99 121.6 92 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 55+70
01/31/97 85S Promenade 1235 12.3 120,0 91 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 55+20
02/03/97 86S Promenade 1231 12,2 120.0 91 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 57+50
02/03/97 87S Promenade 1232.5 12.2 120.8 91 SA
Chardonnay Sta
57+80
02/03/97 88S Offsite Access 1229 11.7 119.9 91 SA
Sta 9+00
02/03/97 89S Offsite Access 1218 10.9 121.8 92 SA
Sta 7+40
02/03/97 90S Promenade 1238.5 11.8 121.2 92 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 54+50
02104/97 ISG Promenade FG 11.2 122,9 93 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 41+50
Notes:
* Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
** Test Taken in Native
S Sewerline SG
AB Aggregate Base
Sub grade
'Z.\
=&
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CCL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
TRACTS 23100,23100-4,23101 & 23101-3
February 7, 1997
J.N,474-96
Page TlI-15
DATE OF TEST RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO. LOCATION ELEVATION MOIST UNIT WT, COMPACTION TYPE
(ft) (%) Ibs/cu ft (%)
02/04/97 2SG Promenade FG 116 121.2 92 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 44+50
02/04/97 3SG Promenade FG 10,7 122,7 93 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 49+30
02/04/97 4SG Promenade FG 10.3 122.5 93 SA
Chardonnay
Sta 52+50
02/04/97 SSG Promenade FG 10.0 123.3 93 5A
Chardonnay
Sta 56+80
02104/97 6SG Offsite Access FG 10,8 123.4 93 5A
Sta 8+40
02/04/97 7SG Offsite Access FG 10.6 123,1 93 SA
Sta 5+60
02/06/97 lAB Promenade FG 8.0 122.6 95 ABl
Chardonnay
Sta 43+90
02/06/97 2AB Promenade FG 7,5 1216 95 ABl
Chardonnay
Sta 46+80
02/06/97 3AB Promenade FG 7.2 123.1 96 AB1
Chardonnay
Sta 49+30
02/06/97 4AB Promenade FG 6,8 125.1 96 ABl
Chardonnay
Sta 52+ 10
02/06/97 5AB Promenade FG 7.2 122.8 95 ABl
Chardonnay
Sta 56-t{)0
02/06/97 6AB Promenade FG 6.8 132,0 95 ABl
Chardonnay
Sta 57+90
02106/97 7AB Offsite Sta 8+30 FG 6.9 132.5 95 AB2
02/06/97 8AB Offsite Sta 5+50 FG 7.2 132,6 95 AB2
Notes:
'. Failing Tests (retests noted in Elevation Column)
.. Test Taken in Native
S
AB
Sewerline SG
Aggregate Base
Sub grade
7P
&
~