HomeMy WebLinkAbout050207 PC Agenda
.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
May 2, 2007 - 6:00 P.M.
********
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 07-17
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Harter
Roll Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you
desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of April 4, 2007
1.2 Approve the Minutes of April 11 , 2007
R:\PLANCOMM'Agendas\2007\05-02-07.doc
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an
appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days
after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
New Items
2 Planninq Application No. PA04-0544, a Development Plan. submitted bv HB & A
Architects. to construct two concrete tilt-up buildinqs totalinq 32.386 square feet for industrial
and service commercial uses on 2.5 acres. located between Calle Cortez and Las
Haciendas Street east of Del Rio Road. Dana Schuma. Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, May 16, 2007, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\PLANCOMM'Agendas\2007\05-02-Q7.doc
2
ITEM #1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 4, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, April 4, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Chiniaeff thanked Ms. Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Chairman Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Guerriero, Carey, Harter, Telesio and Chairman Chiniaeff.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No additional comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 21, 2007
1.2 Approve the Minutes of March 7, 2007
1.3 Approve the Minutes of March 14, 2007.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
R:\MinutesPCI040407
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
New Items
2 Plannino Application No. PA006-0325. a first Extension of Time. submitted bv DR Horton.
for a previouslv approved Development Plan for 98 detached sinole-familv homes. located in
Plannino Area 1A of the Roripauoh Specific Plan south of Murrieta Hot Sprinos Road and
west of the future extension of Butterfield Staqe Road
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Associate Planner Schuma reported on the location of the
first one-year extension of time for previously approved Development Plan.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-13
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0325, THE FIRST ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0133, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 98 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 1A OF THE
RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF
MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (TR29661-1)
3 Plan nino Application No. PA07-0035. a Maior Modification. submitted bv AI Burohard of
BDG Architects. to renovate the exterior of a 97.737 souare foot industrial buildino includino
addino cornices. window framino. faux columns. ornamental fascia and decorative entrance
arcades with stone base pillars. located at 28780 Sinole Oak Drive
Junior Planner Lowrey provided the Planning Commission with a PowerPoint presentation,
highlighting on the following:
o Location
o Analysis
o Architecture
o Site Plan
o Approved CUP.
Commissioner T elesio relayed his appreciation for the before and after pictures of architecture
provided by staff.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. AI Burghard, representing BDG Architects, noted that it would be his understanding that
most of the existing plantings were removed because they were dead or dying.
R\MinutesPC\040407
2
At this time, the pUblic hearing was closed.
The Planning Commission thanked the applicant for the improvements to the building.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA07-o035 A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO RENOVATE
THE EXTERIOR OF A 97,737 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING LOCATED AT 28780 SINGLE OAK DRIVE AND AN
INCREASE IN FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR). THIS IS A 360
DEGREE RENOVATION TO THE EXTERIOR FACADE WHICH
INCLUDES ADDING CORNICES, WINDOW FRAMING, FAUX
COLUMNS, ORNAMENTAL FASCIA AND DECORATIVE
ENTRANCES ARCADES WITH STONE BASE PILLARS. (APN
921-020-050)
4 Planninq Application No. PA06-0002. a Tentative Tract Map. submitted by Ashby USA. to
subdivide 11.5 oross acres into 18 lots (14 sinole-family residential lots and four open space
lots) within Plannino Area 33A of the Roripauoh Specific Plan. oenerally located on the
south side of Nicholas Road. at the future intersection of Nicolas Road and Butterfield Staqe
Road
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Associate Planner Peters provided a staff report,
highlighting on the following:
o Project Description
o Location
o Proposal
o Considerations
o Environmental Determination.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's question, Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that the
applicant would be conditioned to install road improvements; that the map will record but that no
building permits will be issued until the applicant meets their conditions.
Chairman Chiniaeff expressed concern with approving maps before the installation of road
improvements, noting that after recordation of the map the applicant would be able to sell the
lots without any implementation of road improvements.
Providing more clarification, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that in the event the
applicant were to record the map and sell lots, no permits would be allowed until all road
improvements were made as stated in the Conditions of Approval.
R:\MinutesPCI040407
3
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Representing Ashby USA, Mr. Peter Olah, offered the following comments:
o That Ashby USA entered into an agreement with the City Council to post an 8 million
dollar letter of credit that would be tied to constructing Murrieta Hot Springs Road and
Butterfield Stage Road linking all improvements to the new fire station and the pan-
handle
o That all the underground improvements are installed on Butterfield Stage Road and
Murrieta Hot Springs Road with the exception of a 72 inch storm drain line on Murrieta
Hot Springs Road and Nicholas Road
o That the letter of credit, according to the bank, will be posted on Thursday, April 5, 2007,
and would be specific to the south tract boundary on Butterfield Stage Road
o That the applicant is currently in the preparation of a bid packet for the improvements of
the south tract boundary to Rancho California Road
o That the bond and financing would be in place pending an optional tender offer to the
bond holders; that at the March 6, 2007, City Council meeting, a supplement to the
acquisition agreement was approved as well as a deposit agreement that would create a
mechanism to allow the applicant to correct inadequacies in the official statement which
would provide an updated official statement to the bond holders; and that at that point in
time, the bond funds will be released to the developer.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Expressing concern with approvals in the pan before improvements are installed, Chairman
Chiniaeff relayed his willingness to wait for the road improvements.
Echoing Chairman Chiniaeff's cornments, Commissioner Guerriero also queried why approvals
had to be made before road improvements.
For the Planning Commission, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that it would be important to
entitle the subdivisions, advising that once the bond/financing is cleared road improvements will
be made; and stated that the sooner the maps are approved and recorded the better the
outcome.
Chairman Chiniaeff queried if a condition could be tied to the tract map that would require that
the final map not be recorded until Butterfield Stage Road is completed to Rancho California
Road.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's query, Director of Planning noted that at this time, she
would not be familiar with the terms of the Development Agreement.
At this time, the public hearing was reopened.
R:\MinutesPCI040407
4
Mr. Olah noted that the applicant would have an option agreement with KB Homes in that all of
the land east of Murrieta Hot Springs Road would be scheduled for delivery on June 1, 2008;
advising that it would be to the applicant's benefit to have the roads completed by the delivery
date.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
For Commissioner Telesio, Deputy of Public Works York noted that it would be his
understanding that the improvements would be tied to the building permit; that the last operating
memorandum would only clear up the 515 building permits in the pan-handle; that the
Development Agreement would state that there will be no approvals in phase II (pan) until all the
major improvements are made; that operating memorandum No. 4 would state that Nicholas
Road (northerly .5 plus 10 feet) would be built from Butterfield Stage Road to the west
boundary, after which there would be a 45 foot wide strip that will be completed from Calle
Girasol to the water line; and that at this point there would be nothing else that would take you
into the rest of Nicholas Valley in operating rnemorandum No.4; that the pan would need to be
completed; and that it would be referenced in the conditions back to the underlying
Development Agreement.
Offering more information, Mr. Olah noted that after 18 months of working through issues with
Quality Water Control, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, California Fish and Game, and the Army Corp.
with regard to the Santa Gertrudis Creek and the intersection of Long Valley Wash, the
applicant has resolved all issues and would be prepared to move the project forward.
Commissioner Guerriero relayed his frustration with the applicant and his many delays.
Understanding the frustration of the Planning Commission with regard to the applicant's delays,
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that at this time there would be no ground for denial; that
the City Attorney has been working on the Roripaugh project and has raised no concerns with
staffs recommendation; and reiterated that staff would be cornfortable moving the project
forward.
Chairman Chiniaeff advised that it would be his opinion that the project has not been adequately
conditioned and that the improvements should be installed before the recordation of the map;
and that no approvals should be made in the pan-handle until Butterfield Stage Road is
completed to Rancho California Road.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation and Conditions of
Approval. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Chairman Chiniaeff who voted No.
R:\MinutesPCI040407
5
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA06-0002, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (NO. 30767) TO
SUBDIVIDE 11.5 GROSS ACRES INTO 18 LOTS (14 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FOUR OPEN SPACE LOTS)
WITHIN PLANNING AREA 33A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH
SPECIFIC PLAN, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH
SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD, AT FUTURE INTERSECTION OF
NICOLAS ROAD AND BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD. (APN
964-460-004, -005, -010, AND -012)
5 Plannino Application Nos. PA05-0365 and PA07 -0061. a Development Plan and Minor
Exception. submitted by the YMCA. to construct and operate a 26.100 s~uare foot YMCA
buildinq within a 0.66 acre lease area of a 20.23 acre site and to increase the maximum
heioht limit from 35 feet to 40 feet for the YMCA buildino. located at 29119 Maroarita Road
Associate Planner West provided a PowerPoint Presentation (per agenda packet), highlighting
on the following:
o Background
o Project Description
o Location
o Analysis
o Earlier Proposed Architecture
o Proposed Architecture.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Deputy of Public Works York advised that according to the trip
generation table, p.m. peak hours would generate 116 additional vehicles a day; and informed
that currently Margarita Road would operate at a Level of Service (LOS) D.
Associate Planner West noted that security lighting will be installed around the building but
would not be aware of any additional security for the proposed project.
Development Services Administrator McCarthy stated that all the parks in the community would
be visited by the City's Park Rangers which work closely with the Code Enforcement and the
Police Department.
Referencing the operating hours, Associate Planner West advised that the proposed project will
be open to the public Monday through Friday from 5:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m; Saturday from 8:30
a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Sunday from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Noting that the proposed project would be an improvement from the original plan, Commissioner
Harter relayed that it would be his opinion that the rear elevation and the right elevation would
be in need of additional enhancements.
R:\MinulesPCI040407
6
For Commissioner Harter, Associate Planner West added the following comments:
o That trees and shrubs would be proposed on the rear elevation that would face the west
of the park towards the future dog park
o That the front elevation would face the parking lot
o That the topography of the site would limit the area where the building and sidewalks
could be placed
o That for maintenance purposes, Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
requested not to have landscape planters between the building and sidewalk, unless the
landscape planters were at least 4 feet or greater in depth
o That tree and ground cover placement will effectively soften building elevations and
provide screening from the public right-of-way and the view from the park
o That approximately 96 percent of the site will remain landscaped/open space, which
would exceed the minimum requirement of 80 percent in the PR Zone.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Relaying his excitement towards the proposed project, Mr. Jim Morgan, representing the YMCA,
thanked staff, the City Council, the Cornmunity Services Commission, and all the volunteers for
their hard work and dedication.
Mr. Frank Donahoe, volunteer representing the YMCA, spoke highly of the YMCA noting that
the proposed project will be a benefit to the community.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Associate Planner West displayed the proposed colors and its placement on the proposed
project.
For Commissioner Carey, Associate Planner advised that the YMCA will be sharing the existing
spaces with the other uses of the Margarita Community Park.
At this time, the public hearing was reopened.
Mr. Ronson Shipley, Temecula, relayed that although he would not be opposed to a YMCA
facility; noting that he would be of the opinion that the location woiJld not be suitable and that
building on the park would be a waste of tax payers' monies.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Harter noted that although he would be in full support of the proposed project, it
would be his opinion that more landscaping should be installed to buffer/screen from the
adjacent residents.
Associate Planner West added that due in part of the ground lease agreement between the
YMCA and the City which identifies boundaries for the building and sidewalk placement, the
topography of the site would limit the area where the building and sidewalks could be placed.
R:lMinutesPCI040407
7
Offering additional information, Development Services Administrator McCarthy stated that a
constraint would be the width of the property line to the building; that the applicant would barely
meet the fire access requirements; that adding more landscaping would push the building out
which would require more fill being brought onto the site, resulting in loss of parking spaces.
Chairman Chiniaeff echoed Commissioner Harter's concern that more landscaping should be
installed to screen from adjacent apartments.
Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that the elevation of the building adjacent to the
apartments would be a parking structure.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that due to the topography of the site and to accommodate
the building, landscaping was not installed.
Associate Planner West reiterated that due to the width of the driveway currently in place,
adding landscaping would not allow the applicant to meet the fire requirements.
MOTION: Commissioner Telesio moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the
Conditions of Approval. Commissioner Carey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA05-0365, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
AND OPERATE A RECREATION FACILITY TOTALING 26,100
SQUARE FEET ON A 20.23 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT 29119
MARGARITA ROAD (APN: 921-300-006)
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
Referencing the phasing of the signal at southbound Highway 15/Rancho California Road,
Commissioner Guerriero advised that the phasing would be 20 to 30 seconds too fast and that
Cal Trans be contacted to resolve the phasing problem.
Chairman Chiniaeff expressed concem with the advertisement of three-story buildings in Old
Town and directed staff to return with a staff report with regard to three and four-story buildings
in Old Town.
In response to Chairman Chiniaeff's concern, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that staff
will be receiving a proposal from an architect planner that will address massing height issues
with regard to Old Town; advising that it will be brought to the attention of the Planning
Commission for review.
Corn missioner Guerriero spoke regarding a planning workshop that he attended with regard to
parking, and stated that it was an excellent workshop.
R:\MinutesPCI040407
8
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske queried if the Planning Commission would be interested in
changing the time of the Planning Commission meeting.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to keep the Planning Commission meeting at
6:00 p.m.
Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that a field trip to Escondido will be conducted in May
to discuss the possibility of bringing transit into Temecula/Murrieta.
Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that he will not be in attendance of the April 11, 2007, Planning
Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:15 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to April 11. 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis Chiniaeff
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPCI040407
9
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 11, 2007
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Corn missioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners: Guerriero, Carey, Harter, Telesio.
Absent:
Chairman Chiniaeff.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No additional comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Director's Hearino Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Update for March.
MOTION: Commissioner Harter moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Chairman Chiniaeff who was absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Promenade Mall Expansion Parkino Structures.
Associate Planner Peters provided a brief staff report (of record).
Mr. Kenneth Lee, representing Forest City Development, provided a PowerPoint Presentation of
the west and east parking structures, highlighting on the following:
o Examples of garages at high-end malls
R:\MinutesPCI041107
o Design Concepts
o Access and Circulation
o Elevations - east, west, and south
o West Parking Structure
o East Parking Structure.
Commissioner Guerriero relayed his desire for artwork on the structures that would display
Temecula and Wine Country.
Assistant City Manager Johnson advised that the parking structure was upgraded and that the
Beautification Committee was comfortable with the structure as proposed.
Commissioner Carey noted that it would be his desire to add rnore enhancements to the south
elevation of the parking structures.
For the Planning Commission, Mr. Lee noted that the Cypress Trees proposed will be 20 foot
trees and noted that landscaping and hardscape would be an important elernent of the project.
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to receive and file this report.
Referencing park and ride sites, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the City Manager's
office would currently be exploring park and ride opportunities.
Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the Infrastructure Beautification Committee consisted
of Mayor Pro Tem Naggar and Council Member Edwards.
Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that he would discuss adding a Planning Commissioner
to the Beautification Committee with the City Council.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
No additional comments.
With regard to color palettes, Commissioner Harter requested colored elevations with staffs
report.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No additional comments.
R:\MinutesPClO41107
2
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:40 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to May 2. 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Dennis Chiniaeff
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPCI041107
3
ITEM #2
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 2, 2007
Dana Schuma
TITLE: Associate Planner
Planning Application No. PA04-0544, a Development Plan to
construct two concrete tilt-up buildings totaling 32,386 square
feet for industrial and service commercial uses on 2.5 acres
located between Calle Cortez and Las Haciendas Street east of
Del Rio Road (APNs 921-050-016; 020)
l8J Approve with Conditions
D Deny
o Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recornrnend Denial
l8J Categorically Exernpt
(Section) 15332
(Class) 32
D Notice of Determination
(Section)
D Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:ID P\2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-Q544.doc
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: HB & A Architects, Mark Stock
Date of Completion: October 4, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date: May 2, 2007
General Plan Designation: Service Commercial (SC) and Industrial Park (IP)
Zoning Designation: Service Commercial (SC) and Light Industrial (L1)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Existing Industrial Buildings
Existing Service Cornrnercial Buildings
Existing Service Cornmercial Buildings
Existing Industrial Buildings
Lot Area:
2.5 gross acres/1 09,116 square feet
Total Floor Area/Ratio:
32,260 SF/0.30 FAR
Landscape Area/Coverage:
22,883 SF/21 % coverage
Parking Required/Provided:
71 required/76 provided
68 standard and three handicapped/72 standard and four
handicapped
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
An application for a Development Plan was submitted on October 1, 2004. A DRC meeting
was held on November 18, 2004 to discuss site, landscaping, architecture and other
departmental issues. The applicant submitted revised plans on March 27, 2006. A second
DRC letter was sent on May 31, 2006 and final plans were submitted on June 22, 2006. In
November, 2006, the applicant cornpleted the required environmental documents for the
project and the elevations were slightly modified in February, 2007, to address architectural
enhancements recommended by Planning staff.
R:\D PI2OO4\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-0544.doc
2
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project proposes to construct two single-story buildings totaling 32,386 square feet on two
individual parcels. The northerly parcel (Lot A) is zoned Service Cornrnercial (SC) and the
southerly parcel (Lot B) is zoned Light Industrial. The project conforrns to the Service
Commercial and Light Industrial developrnent regulations listed in the City's Development
Code, including building setbacks, lot coverage, and height. Building 'A', proposed on Lot A,
will be 16,982 square feet. The proposed 0.30 floor area ratio (FAR) meets the target FAR of
30 percent for the Service Comrnercial zone. Building 'B', proposed on Lot B, will be 15,278
square feet with a 0.29 FAR. The 29 percent FAR is below the target ratio of 40 percent for the
Light Industrial zone. The maxirnum building height allowed in both zones is 50 feet, and the
proposed buildings will both be 24 feet in height.
Access, Circulation. and Parkino
Due to the long, linear shape of the property and the existing development surrounding the
perimeter, the project's site design is sornewhat constrained and shared access with adjacent
parcels was not feasible. The project site therefore will have four access points frorn the
street. Vehicle access will be provided by four drive aisles: two located off of Las Haciendas
Street and two located off of Calle Cortez. The main entrance will be from the eastern
driveway off of Calle Cortez with a secondary access available off of Las Haciendas Street.
The two driveways proposed on the west side of the site are intended for delivery trucks and
other large vehicles to service the site. The project has been conditioned to record a
reciprocal access agreement between the two parcels.
The proposed drive aisles provide for a clear path of travel around the buildings and
throughout the site. Enhanced textured paving has also been provided to slow traffic at a three
way intersection between the buildings. The proposed project requires 71 parking spaces and
provides 76 parking spaces (72 standard and four handicapped spaces), plus bicycle parking,
which exceeds the parking requirements of the Development Code. The Public Works
Department has analyzed the potential traffic impacts of the project and has determined that
the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously
approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Departrnent also reviewed the plans
and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to
the site.
Architecture
The proposed buildings are consistent with the Development Code, Design Guidelines, and
compatible with other adjacent buildings. The proposed architecture includes smooth concrete
with decorative reveals. The applicant uses color variation in hues of beige and grey to break
up the building mass. The buildings include 10-foot wide recessed entries enhanced with
decorative stone veneer. The buildings provide adequate roofline variation by raising the
middle parapet and providing a decorative cornice both on the lower entries and on the
ridgeline. Windows on all sides of the building help to break up the expansive walls and also
provide for adequate light into the building. The design is further enhanced with decorative
lighting and painted steel canopies to complete the look of the sleek industrial architecture that
the building represents. .
R:ID P\2004\04-Q544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezlPC Staff Report PA04-Q544.doc
3
Landscapinq
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Developrnent Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placernent will serve to screen onsite parking and trash
enclosure areas, and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes five different
types of trees in various sizes ranging from 15 gallon to 48-inch size box trees. The project
also provides two employee outdoor eating areas, as well as a decorative pedestrian pathway
throughout the site. The employee break area will have a trellis structure as well as
surrounding landscaping to provide shade. The project proposes to landscape 22,883 square
feet or 21 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimurn landscaping requirement for the
Service Commercial (CC) and Light Industrial (L1) zones of 20 percent.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 21, 2007, and mailed to
the property owners within a 600-foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 32, Section
15332, In-fill Development Projects)
1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all
applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designations and
regulations. The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan and
zoning designations of Light Industrial and Service Cornrnercial. The project is
consistent with all development regulations, including setbacks, height, and FAR
requirements for the site.
2. The proposed development occurs within City lirnits on a project site that is less than
five acres and is substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is proposed on a
2.5 acre site surrounded by existing industrial and service commercial development to
the north, south, east, and west.
3. The project site is not known to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or
threatened species. The project site is not known to have value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species. The site has been previously graded and
disturbed, and is not identified as a potentially sensitive habitat area by the General
Plan.
4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or
water quality. Industrial and service commercial development was anticipated for the
project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project
has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the
General Plan EIR.
5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The utility and
public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or
expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. The utility
R:ID Pl2004\04-QS44 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-QS44.doc
4
and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new
facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project.
Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development.
CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached
Conditions of Approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (17.05.010.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Ternecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City.
The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the
project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies and
standards for light industrial and service commercial development. The proposed light
industrial andlor service commercial uses are permitted in the land use designation
standards contained in the General Plan and Development Code. The site is properly
planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development
proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The overall design of the project, including the lot coverage, building height, setbacks,
parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and
intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The
project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner
consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6
2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7
3. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 8
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
4. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 9
R:\D P\2004\04-QS44 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-QS44.doc
S
ATTACHMENT NO.1
VICINITY MAP
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-QS44.doc
6
PA04-0544
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:\D P\2004I04-QS44 Atvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-QS44.doc
7
! I II' II
'" dl ,!II) n
, . '01.1' 11,' 'I'
w ""'II'l'I"..,.,!
t- I'lt"i i ~ R ~W} :!! .
o ; I I" I' . q I . n'I" II
z ~! I i ~ ! ~ a 9~ Ii c
!l~ I; 1111111 h.1 ill
*000000*? ~~
i
i
<I
L
I'
.1
I.
dll
~' .
~
o
u
Ul
....l
......l
It-(
r~
..CI)
~e:l
~~
filUl
~p...
00
!l:~
p...
N
~
4l
I '
ill:
II i !
II I I I
mOlD
I
I!
,'b'
! I,ll!
It.'
III!!
.
Ii
11!ll
~u~i
IlllI!
~
~ ~
~ ....
j I "-'111,1 illlil I '\,
'llllll".l ',! (0
Ii 11 'I'~ "
.!1I1! Ii Iii
I
l'
.; ,.
m 1m ~ !'I I : II
, ;.. i ! i ,
~, :i:i:i ~:i~ :i:i 9 i ~ ii-I
..~ II~ ~~; l! E . II ~
II II, ..1 ", "" . - I II , . . i'
! IlU!1 I i I I. I. Iii
!lllI: hll'" II :lll! i .j I !Ill
: hlilllm IlI!.H 1m I ! Iii .ll i ;;
I
,. .
.; I. I
!II 1m ~ !I! l : ~
Ii! I ;
~ :i:i:i :i:i:i :i:i 9 9 ~ Ii
.~i' Iii .. .. ii '
illli' t, !! . - I II ... 'I
'lil'l.
I hllll . I !~
. !111l: :ll lill 'I !Ill! i"l i !! !!
. hlill ~m ul flli Ill! I ! Iii II II ,;
;
.
Ii
Ii
~ ,;:~:~:m:f :
,~~:l;,::;!,!; ~~ ~ ~ : ~ ~.
.....-... -~..
i~I~~!:i;;~~! ~ 8 e ~ ~
.,.... ::::. -
~!N~~:: ~
. i! ~:;;;:;;~ ;
. <v v.....
. >
~~
r
,!
___~___Z]Hj():> ]11V:> ___
I
I!l I .:.:.:-::::
~ g.... '.'
, . !v((
l
"ll
~d
:;'
i,.
"ll
M
----------------------
VONJOVH SYl
F
!I
o '
..
..
,
i ~ t
z.
o(~
~,
"-
w~
...
~
-.
~
0(
'"
:;)
...
u
w
...
r
u
'"
0(
'I t
'l'/
. '
I '
.
.
.
.
.
. ,
"=,
.
.,
f'.
. ,
...
I ,
<J) !d II I
w 1 I,
Iii II . ,.
.... ~i!
0 fl!j'! ~! i i
z
iiM l
0%0€>
~ 0
w ,
- '"
~N .. ~
_w wv
w~ . ~I
u ~ i ~
00 0< ;
.v v"
. , , ;
.v n::
N"
w" ". L!'3:"~
-< <.
<v v. '0"
>
< <<,;>>
z
(~
~
~.z
,..~
..,....,. ....... ..,.,'"
~----~ r----l : -- 1 ;----1 r----1
~
1 ~~~~~1 -
,----,
! I
r-
L_
, I I
,
,
f-
'"
o
o
;----1
~.
.n
' ,
'----1
, ,
~
~
[~
I
it
1
,
L~
, ~ H g
,
[~ ,
,
i I e
,
,
r- L~
L_
I [~ [~ .
II
,
H i H I
f- ~ g ,
,
,
-
I I
II II I t
- _-.J
, ,
L ~ I g , ~ I I
L
,~ 4i~ _J
,I --
! I!
I t it
L ~ I I I I
L
, I
, ,
L ,
L_
-
I it ~ ~
r- ~ I I ~
, ,
1[: ,
,
~ L~ "
h 11 0 ~
Ii ,I ~~ , ~;
,
,
., , .,
j ~~___J ' , lJ ' , , , 'lJ' N
l____j L~__J l____J , , , , , ,
l:: J l____J L____J l____J
L:J
z z z
~ 0 0 t
~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ 2
~ ~
i!:~ ~~ z
..
~~ S1~ 0
~
.. 0
~~
.~
'"
'"
w
I-
o
Z
p
'II I II
I '! :1: ill!
I II Ii !.j 11'11
1111' ili ,.!: I
! 1ii!!B Ini'!
i!i!! IIIIII! II hl!!
0_<S><S><S><6><S><S>~~4l>4l>4l>
.
.'
..
'II'
Iii
ill I!
Ii ill il
UBI
~ :;Fi;;~1: ~~ '"
; '::0;'i.11.1 w
:;j~:~::i:li~: -
::,";::j, h.:~ ....... ... <(
:'r~::.,'::., II< W w U
:,',~::;;:;:.. W I- I-
~ ;!!l!ll~i!!;!! ~; ~ E
Ji!liii!lj;!l ~ 5 3 ~
;~iE;;m;:!;:
z ~
0 ~
~ ~
. ~
E
s ~
",
~ ; ~J
~~ r
~ s
~
<>
'"
~j 1.: ~ ,
. - "
~ ~ ". ~; = -
. ." ....
D" .. .
;@....
. (]".
. : ~
" ..
" .....
z
I
~
"
~
~1
.>
z
"'
z
0
...
<(
>
w
~
w
<(
C
z
Cl
~
::J
'"
~
'"
w
....
o
z
,I I
Ill! II.
II!;!' I'll
,,! I'! !!
'!l 111111111
Ld! ",
00<>000000<l><g><l>
,
! ~
'1..11
il;i
III Ii
1111111
dllll
0@Q@
~ ::P!~:;I~ ~~ '"
i!!;:!~ifi::~! -
"<
_u
N
0<
u"
o
_u
">
<-
UN
""
z:
0,
I-~
<~
>
w
~
w
'"
<:l
z
0
~
:J
a>
~
~ ~
~ ~
I;; 0
~ "
~ ;
M . .
~
z z
0
~ 0
"
~ > ~
~ ~, ~,
"~
~; ~;
;:l 0
. .
" . N
0
z. ~
ATTACHMENT NO.3
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-_
R:\D P\2004\04-Q544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-0544.doc
8
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0544, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
TWO CONCRETE TILT-UP BUILDINGS TOTALING 32,386
SQUARE FEET FOR INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE
COMMERCIAL USES ON 2.5 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN
CALLE CORTEZ AND LAS HACIENDAS STREET EAST OF
DEL RIO ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-
050-016 AND 921-050-020
Section 1. Procedural Findinos. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On October 4,2004, HB & A Architects filed Planning Application No. PA04-0544
(Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Developrnent Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the
time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular rneeting, considered the Application and
environrnental review on May 2, 2007 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at
which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this rnatter.
D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA04-0544 subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinos. The Planning Cornrnission, in approving the Application
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Plan (17.05.010.F)
A. The proposed use is in conforrnance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City;
The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the
project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies
and standards for light industrial and service commercial development. The proposed
light industrial and/or service commercial uses are permitted in the land use designation
standards contained in the General Plan and Development Code. The site is properly
planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of
development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and
building codes.
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-calle Cortez\Draft Reso.doc
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare;
The overall design of the project, including the lot coverage, building height, setbacks,
parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and
intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The
project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner
consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Cornpliance. In accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exernpt
from further environmental review and the Planning Comrnission hereby makes the following
findings and determinations in connection with the approval of PA04-0544:
Class 32, Section 15332, In-fill Development Projects
A. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all
applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations;
The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan and zoning
designations of Light Industrial and Service Commercial. The project is consistent with
all development regulations, including setbacks, height, and FAR requirements for the
site.
B. The proposed development occurs within city lirnits on a project site that is less
than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses;
The project is proposed on a 2.5 acre site surrounded by existing industrial and service
commercial development to the north, south, east, and west.
C.
species;
The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened
The project site is not known to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened
species. The site has been previously graded and disturbed, and is not identified as a
potentially sensitive habitat area by the General Plan.
D. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality,
or water quality;
Industrial and service commercial development was anticipated for the project site and
the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed
and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR.
E. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services;
The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no
new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the
project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed
development.
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\Draft Reso.doc
2
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Comrnission of the City of Temecula approves
Planning ApPlication No. PA04-0544, a Development Plan to construct two buildings totaling
32,386 square feet on 2.5 acres located between Calle Cortz and Las Haciendas Street, subject
to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Comrnission this 2nd day of May, 2007.
Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairrnan
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 2nd day of May,
2007, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: .
ABSTAIN:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:\D NOO4\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\Draft Reso.doc
3
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties.CaUe Cortez\Draft Reso.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA04-0544
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct two concrete tilt-up
buildings totaling 32,386 square feet for industrial and
service commercial uses on 2.5 acres located between
Calle Cortez and Las Haciendas Street east of Del Rio
Road
Assessor's Parcel No.
921-050-020 and 921-050-016
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Industrial and Commercial
Industrial and Service Commercial
Industrial and Service Commercial
Approval Date:
May 2, 2007
Expiration Date:
May 2, 2009
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00)
for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as
provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the
Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall
be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
R:\D Pl2004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezlORAFT COAs.doc
1
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
R:\D PI2OO4\04-Q544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
2
Planning Department
2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final Conditions of Approval that will be provided
by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for
their files.
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgrnents, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this Development Plan.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
9. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed
satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an itern, material, equipment,
finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required
by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case
the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the
decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Concrete Tilt-up Panels
Color
Sherwin Williams "Svelte Sage" SW 6164
Sherwin Williams "Ancient Marble" SW 6162
Sherwin Williams "Svelte Sage" SW 6164
Painted steel shade
Parapet
Decorative Canopies
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
3
Entry Facades
Trash Enclosure
Trellises
Tables and Benches
Stone Veneer
Sherwin Williams "Svelte Sage" SW 6164
Sherwin Williams "Svelte Sage" SW 6164
Sherwin Williams "Svelte Sage" SW 6164
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11 . The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for perrnanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
14. A Reciprocal Access Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across
both parcels that are part of the project, shall be recorded and a copy provided to the
Planning Department.
Public Works Department
15. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall
be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
16. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
17. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36' City of
Temecula mylars.
18. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent
post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent
non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving
water.
19. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted to the City. The WQMP will
include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment.
mechanisms.
R:\D P\2004\04-Q544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
4
Building and Safety Department
20. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, Califomia Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
21. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area
wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on
March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building
permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee
schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
22. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
23. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payrnent or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
25. Show all building setbacks.
26. Developments with Multi-tenant Buildings or Shell Buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the
operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically
proposed.
27. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
28. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998).
29. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
30. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours
of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21,
specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-
quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.rn. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
R:\D 1'12004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
5
Fire Prevention
31. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
32. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all comrnercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at
20 PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 hour duration. The Fire Flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A).
33. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A cornbination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2"
outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets.
Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no
more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage
to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available frorn any adjacent hydrant(s) in the
system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and
Appendix III-B).
34. FDC(s) shall be located within 50 feet of a public fire hydrant, on the right-of-way, and a
minimum of 40-feet from the building.
35. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior
to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2).
36. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code perrnit.
These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per
the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC 105).
Community Services Department
37. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
38. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
39. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
40. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property
owner or maintenance association.
Police Department
41. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings should be removed or painted over within
24 hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch
center (951) 696-HELP.
R:\D P\2004\04-o544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\DRAFT COAs.doc
6
42. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings should be placed in a well-
lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This
feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings.
43. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with section
22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
44. Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all
guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated
with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police
Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes
special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the
event is open to the general public.
R:ID PI2004104-0544 Alvarez Properties.Calle CortezlDRAFT COAs.doc
7
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
RID PI2OO4\D4-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
8
Planning Department
45. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
46. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the
Director of Planning.
47. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeologicaVcultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
Public Works Department
48. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property.
49. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and
erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works.
50. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
51. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
52. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's
standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
53. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number
R:ID P12OO4\04-o544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezlDRAFT COAs.doc
9
(WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of
construction activities.
54. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
55. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental
Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property.
56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula.Municipal
Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by
providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
57. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
58. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Fire Prevention
59. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150
feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire
flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2).
60. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord 16.03.020).
61. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary FireDepartmentaccess roads shall be an all weather surface for
80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
62. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
63. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent (CFC
902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14).
R:\D P\2004104-o544 Alvarez Properties-Calte CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
10
64. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, as
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 902.2.1).
65. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4).
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
11
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
R:ID PI2OO4104-0544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
12
Planning Department
66. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
67. All downspouts shall be internalized.
68. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of T emecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one
inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for
final planting inspection".
d. A note on the plans stating that ''The contractor shall provide two copies of an
agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection".
e. One copy of the approved grading plan.
f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map.
i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape rnaintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be
required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head
coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The applicanVowner shall contact the
Planning Department to schedule inspections.
69. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire
check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group
utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-
thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and
insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
R:ID P\2004VJ4-oS44 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezlDRAFT COAs.doc
13
70. Landscape construction drawings shall show root barriers for Robinia where planted within
10' of hardscape or buildings.
71. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas, including but not limited to
trellises, decorative furniture, and hardscape, to match the style of the building subjectto the
approval of the Planning Director.
72. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
73. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Public Works Department
74. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of T emecula Standard No. 207 A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
75. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Las Haciendas Street (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to
include installation of curb, drive approaches, sidewalk, street lights and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve Calle Cortez (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to include
installation of curb, drive approaches, sidewalk, street lights and utilities (including
but not limited to water and sewer).
c. Undergrounding of existing or proposed utility distribution lines in accordance with
Ordinance 04-02 (Section 15.04.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code).
76. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works.
R:\D P\2OO4'IJ4-oS44 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
14
77. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
78. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property.
79. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Developrnent Irnpact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the T emecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
80. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the T emecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
Building and Safety Department
81. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
82. A sound transmission control study shall be prepared and submitted at time of plan review in
accordance with the provisions of Appendix Chapter 12, Section 1208A, of the 2001 edition
of the California Building Code.
83. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
84. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
85. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
86. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
87. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
88. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Fire Prevention
89. Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted and
to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire and life
safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA -13,24,72 and 231-C.
90. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish three copies of the water
system plans directly to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans
shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
R:\D PI2004104.0544 Alvarez Properties-Catte CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
15
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior
to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3,
901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1).
91. Prior to building permit, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire
Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any
portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all
weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet
(CFC sec 902).
92. Prior to issuance of building permit fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
93. Prior to issuance of building permit fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention
Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing
contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Community Services Department
94. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
Police Department
95. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no
more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery
should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings
utilizing lower level windows.
a. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building roof tops be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by ''would-be burglars." Trees also act as a
natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a six feet clearance from the
buildings.
b. Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
96. All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and minimized after
hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance,
California Government Code 8565. Furthermore, recommend all exterior lighting be in
compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance 665 requiring low-pressure sodium lighting.
a. Recommend all exterior doors have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed
above each door. The doors should be illuminated with a minimum one foot candle
illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed.
b. All exterior night lighting should be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient
lighting during hours of darkness and to prevent problems on the premises.
c. The Governors Order to address the power crisis became effective March 18,2001.
This bill calls for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-
business hours. The order, in part, states: "All California retail establishments,
including but not limited to shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall
R:\D P\2004\04-0544 Atvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
16
substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours
except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property."
d. "Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 in
accordance with section 8565 of the California Government Code."
97. Recommend all doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous
hardware is commercial or institution grade.
R:\D P\2004I04-o544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
17
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR
ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT
R:\D P\2004\04-Q544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\DRAFT COAs.doc
18
Planning Department
98. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this perrnit, the applicant
shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from
view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is
determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet
walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof
element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning.
99. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
100. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Departrnent for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
101. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating
the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
102. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
103. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed
prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
104. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
105. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for
immediate implementation.
R:ID P\2004I04-oS44 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
19
106. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
107. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
108. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Fire Prevention
109. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
110. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a
contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial
buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum
of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau (CFC 901.4.4).
111. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and
type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9).
112. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for
monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm
system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall
be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10).
113. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be
provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located
to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4).
114. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
115. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting
and or signs.
R:\D P\2004\()4-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\DRAFT COAs.doc
20
116. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention
for approval.
Police Department
117. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed
and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm cornpany, to notify the
Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses
located within a specific building should have their own alarm system.
R:ID P\20041D4-0544 Alvarez Properties-Calle CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
21
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
R:ID P\2004\04-o544 Alvarez Properties-Calte CortezIDRAFT COAs.doc
22
118. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated October 21,2004, a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance
with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be
subject to Cornmunity Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R:\O PI2004104-o544 Atvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\ORAFT COAs.doc
23
@
Rancho
Water
Board of Directors
John E. Hoagland
President
Csaba F. Ko
Sr. Vice President
Stephen J. Corona
Ralph lL Daily
Ben R. Drake
Lisa D. Berman
Michael R. McMillan
Officers:
Brian J. Brady
General Manager
Phillip L Forbes
Director of Finanee- Treasurer
E.P. "Bob" Lemons
Director of Engineering
Perry R. Louck
Controller
Linda M. Fregoso
District Se.:.:retaryf Administrative
Services Manager
C. Michael Cowett
Best Best & Krieger LLP
General Counsel
October 21, 2004
Christine Damko, Project Planner
City ofTemecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
1~ R (G; r:; : 1:.1; ;; W'~-
II:; ... .. I'} '-"
OCT 2 5 2004
By
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY; LOTS NO. 16 AND NO. 20 OF
TRACT NO. 3841; APN 921-050-016 AND APN 921-050-020
CITY PROJECT NO. P A04-0544 (ALVAREZ PROPERTIES]
Dear Ms. Damko:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or
off-site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between
RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will
need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements.
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. All
on-site public water facilities will require public utility easements in favor of
RCWD.
This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium
development, with individual building owners and an owners' association
maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection, and
landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD
requires that the City include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance
Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to this
agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each
condominium unit.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
71l!tJ~:'PE
Development Engineering Manager
O41MM:atl77\FCF
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Rancho California Water District
42135 Winchester Road. Post Office&][ 9017 . Temecula, California 92589-9017 . (951) 296-6900 . FAX (951) 296-6860
ATTACHMENT NO.4
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
R:\D Pl2004\04-oS44 Alvarez Properties-Calle Cortez\PC Staff Report PA04-oS44.doc
9
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Case No:
Applicant:
Location:
Planning Application No. PA04-0544
HB & A Architects
Located between Calle Cortez and Las Haciendas Street east of Del Rio Road
Proposal:
A Development Plan to construct two concrete tilt-up buildings totaling 32,386 square feet
for industrial and service commercial uses on 2.5 acres
Class 32 Exemption per CEQA Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects)
Dana Schuma, Associate Planner
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590
Date of Hearing: May 2, 2007
Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m.
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to,
the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department,
43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Questions concerning the
project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.
CEQA Action:
Case Planner:
~<I'
/~
,$<JY
,
3t2.S
R,ID 1'12004\04-0544 Alvarez Properties-cane Cmrez\NOPH.doc