The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About071807 PC Agenda IJ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE July 18,2007 - 6:00 P.M. ******** Next in Order: Resolution No. 07-23 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: Commissioner Carey Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and TeJesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 mifjutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 6, 2007 1.2 Approve the Minutes of June 20, 2007 R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2007\07 -18-07.doc COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2 Planninq Application No. PA07-0132. a Development Plan. submitted bv Michael Crews Development. for the construction of a one-story 13.958 square foot commercial buildinq. located on the northwest corner of Landinqs and Villaqe Roads within the Harveston Specific Plan. Christine Damko. Associate Planner. 3 Planninq Application No. PA06-0278. a Development Plan. submitted bv Kal Pacific & Associates. to construct three professional office buildinqs totalinq 38.501 square feet on a 2.8 acre site. located on the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Marqarita Road. Dana Schuma. Associate Planner. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, August 1, 2007, 6:00 p.m., Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\PLANCOMM\Agendas\2007\07-18-07.doc 2 ITEM #1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 6, 2007 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, June 6, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Chairman Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of May 16, 2007. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 2 Planninq Application No. PA06-0026. a Conditional Use Permit. submitted by Randi Newton representinq Spectrum Surveying. to construct a 70-foot tall T-Mobile wireless telecommunication facility desiqned as a broadleaf tree within a 676 square foot enclosure. located at 42010 Moraqa Road. adiacent to the northwest corner of Rancho California and Moraqa Roads By way of PowerPoint presentation, Associate Planner Damko highlighted on the following: o Location o Elevations R\MinutesPC\060607 o Coverage o Environmental Determination. Associate Planner Damko requested that Condition of Approval No. 15 be deleted and that a Public Works Condition be added imposing that a encroachment permit be required for the project; and advised that the applicant would be in agreement of both the deletion of No. 15 and the added Public Works Condition of Approval. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Ms. Randi Newton, representing Spectrum Surveying, noted that she would be available for any questions. At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the deletion of Condition of Approval No. 15 and the added Public Works Encroachment Permit Condition. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0026, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A 70 FOOT TALL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY WITHIN A 676 SQUARE FOOT ENCLOSURE TO BE LOCATED AT ORCHARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP CHURCH AT 42010 MORAGA ROAD ADJACENT TO THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA AND MORAGA ROADS (APN: 921-310- 004) 3 Planning Application Nos. PA06-0187 and PA07-0049. a Development Plan. submitted by Walt Allen Architects. to replace an existinq cluster of modular buildings with a three-storv. 14.093 square foot commercial office buildinq and a 7.369 square foot underground parkinq structure on a 0.53 acre site. and a Minor Exception to allow for a 15 percent buildinq heiqht increase. located at 27423 Ynez Road Associate Planner Schuma provided a PowerPoint presentation, focusing on the following: o Project Description o Site Plan o Elevations o Architecture - South and East o Landscaping o Exceptional Architecture Design - for increased FAR o Underground Parking R:\MinutesPCI060607 2 Staff requested the deletion of Condition of Approval 93b replacing with the standard condition of Mt. Palomar Ordinance in its replacement; amend Condition of Approval 79a to improve the sidewalk from the southerly boundary of Parcel 2 to the northerly boundary of Parcel 1 ; and that a condition be added to require that the amendment to the Tower Plaza sign program be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission. Associate Planner Schuma noted the following: o That the aluminum accents on the proposed project would provide lighting opportunities and energy efficiency o That the bright accent (orange/red) tone would conform to the modern architecture of the building o That the target Floor Area Ratio (FAR) would be 30 percent and that the project would propose a net Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 61 percent. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Walt Allen, representing Walt Allen Architect, noted the following: o That the applicant worked diligently to add as much as he could on the proposed site, noting that the proposed project would be an exemplary example of where architecture is headed; and that the proposed building would be setting a standard of redevelopment for the center o That the applicant would be in agreement of the amendment to Condition of Approval No. 79a as stated above by staff. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Carey noted that although he would be in favor of the proposed project, he would not be desirous of the red/orange accent on the building. Echoing Commissioner Carey's comments, Commissioner Harter relayed his enthusiasm with the outstanding architecture of the project but would not be in favor of the red/orange accent on the building and would request that the red/orange color be toned down. Appreciating the implementation of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), impervious concrete and outstanding architecture, Commissioner Guerriero relayed that he would not have an opinion one way or the other regarding the red/orange accent. Noting that he would be in favor of the proposed project, Commissioner Telesio stated that he, as well, would not be in favor of the red/orange accents on the building. Having raised the issue of increased FAR at previous Planning Commission meetings, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that it would be his opinion that the Planning Commission has not yet approved an FAR that would meet the desired goal of 30 percent in the last couple of years; that the Planning Commission would need to have a specific standards that an applicant would need in order to receive an increase in FAR. R:lMinutesPCI060607 3 Commissioner Chiniaeff also relayed that if the Planning Commission approves staffs recommendation, it would be important to ensure that the remainder of the center conform to the same type of architecture and design of the proposed project. Commissioner Chiniaeff also stated that he would be in favor of the proposed project and would not have a concern with the red/orange accents. Echoing Commissioner Chiniaeffs comment with regard to requiring that the center conform to the design and architecture of the proposed project, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that if the project is approved, standards could be implemented to ensure that continuity is met. Commissioner Telesio agreed that guidelines for increased Floor Area Ratio (FAR) would be desired and helpful not only for the Planning Commission but for staff. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that a workshop could be scheduled pertaining to requests for increased Floor Area Ratio and requirements that would need to be met. Concurring that a workshop would be needed, Commissioner Guerriero stated that the City's Design Guidelines require that applicants provide Green or other forms of energy but that this has not been enforced by staff or the Planning Commission. Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that specific standards could be created by the Planning Commission and staff. Chairman Chiniaeff noted that the price of leaseable land would be high enough to warrant the construction of underground parking and parking structures. For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Attorney Curley relayed that that one vote pertaining to the project be required. For clarification purposes, the public hearing was reopened. Mr. Walt Allen relayed that he would be willing to tone down the red/orange accent color to a terra cotta color. At this time, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the amended Conditions of Approval as requested by staff; and that the red/orange accents be toned down to a terra cotta color. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous allproval. . R:\MinutesPCI060607 4 PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA06-0187 AND PA07-004, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REPLACE AN EXISTING CLUSTER OF MODULAR BUILDINGS WITH A FOUR-STORY, 26,941 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING ON 0.53 ACRES LOCATED AT 27423 YNEZ ROAD, AND A MINOR EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR A 15 PERCENT BUILDING HEIGHT INCREASE 4 Planninq Application No. PA01-0157. a Resolution of the Planning Commission recommending that the Citv Council adopt an Ordinance adding chapter 9.20 to the Temecula Municipal Code establishinq Citywide standards for requlatinq noise By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Senior Planner Papp highlighted on the following: o Background o Power Tools and Equipment o Audio Equipment o Sound Amplifying Equipment or Live Music o Construction o Barking Dogs and Keeping of Noisy Animals o Enforcement o Public Comments o Environmental Determination. In response to the questions by the Planning Commission, Senior Planner Papp relayed the following: o That the hours of operation for construction could be changed in the Ordinance to 6:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. o That any City sponsored event or co-sponsored event would be requesting a Temporary Use Permit (TUP); and therefore, would be exempt. Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with creating Noise Ordinances and regulations for enforcement when State Law would already be in place to cover these types of issues and/or concerns. Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that representatives from the Police Department had sat in on all meetings regarding the proposed Ordinances and would be comfortable with the proposed Ordinance as written. Further clarifying, Assistant City Attorney Curley relayed that the courts have approved local agencies adopting Noise Ordinances, and that the Ordinance would be furthering tools rather than duplicative. Commissioner Telesio expressed concern with the ability to carry out enforcement beyond what State Code would allow. R\MinutesPCI060607 5 Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that the proposed Ordinance would be modeled after the County's Ordinance. Commissioner Guerriero expressed concern with information being discussed between staff and police that is not being included in staff's report; and that the Commission would have difficulty making decisions without the proper information. In response to Commissioner Carey's query, Senior Planner Papp relayed that Audio Equipment and Sound Amplifying Equipment or Live Music hours would be from the 10:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. and/or anytime if determined unreasonable; and that it would be his understanding that events in Old Town would require a Temporary Use Permit (TUP). Commissioner Carey relayed that it would be his opinion that the proposed Ordinance will be difficult to enforce. Relaying that he would be in favor of the proposed Noise Ordinance, Commissioner Harter expressed concern with the following: o That two different Code Enforcement Officers could have two different standards of the meaning "Loud and Raucous' o That the language in the proposed Noise Ordinance would need to be more concise o That it would not be reasonable for a Code Enforcement Officer to sit 30 to 60 minutes to determine whether or not an animal is making incessant noise. In response to Commissioner Harter, Senior Planner Papp relayed that his concerns were discussed at City Council subcommittee meetings; and that although at times it may be unrealistic to expect a Code Enforcement Officer to sit and observe 60 minutes or more, the Enforcement Officer would be a signer of a complaint along with the complainant. Relaying his amazement with this item coming before the Commission at this time, Chairman Chiniaeff stated the following: o Queried if all the stakeholders were involved in the subcommittee meetings o That he would have a concern with the inequities that would be built into the proposed Noise Ordinance o That there may be individuals opposed to an in fill project being built where a map would be required o That he would have difficulty understanding why a City sponsored event would not be subject to a CEQA review o That the City has adopted its own noise elements in its General Plan and queried why would the City include the County's General Plan o That if a homeowner is restricted to using Power Tools and Equipment during specific hours then a Homeowners Association should be restricted to the same hours as a homeowner o That Section 9.20.070 - Exceptions. That this Section would be arbitrary and would be of the opinion that standards should be set for defining what the Exceptions would be o That the language "Peace and Quiet" under "Loud and Raucous" be defined and how would it be applied to everyone in the same manner. R\MinutesPCI060607 6 Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that there would be two sets of standards that the Commission would be considering, noting the following: o That Section 9.20.040 General Sound Level Standards - would be fairly consistent with State-wide Ordinances o That Section 9.20.060 Special Sound Sources Standards - that these would be perceived as providing unique impacts and would need to be refined beyond the general rules. Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that he would request that staff compare its requests with other communities to ensure that they would be typical and consistent with the City of Temecula's general standards. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. P. T. Rothschild, Murrieta, spoke against the proposed Noise Ordinance, noting that there would currently be a Noise Ordinance in place and would not see the need for another one; and would request that the Commission add time limits to band practices that would be consistent with surrounding communities general standards. Mr. Paul Bahu, Temecula, expressed his concern with the proposed Noise Ordinance. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Chairman Chiniaeff requested that this item be continued to allow staff an opportunity to address concerns expressed by the Planning Commission. MOTION: Chairman Chiniaeff moved to continue Item NO.4 to Wednesday, August 1, 2007. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS Commissioner Carey commented on the Home Depot on SR79 South, relaying that the aesthetics of the parking has greatly improved. Commissioner Telesio thanked staff for their efforts with regard to the Marie Callender's and that the color is improved; but did relay concern with the signage/monument at Pechanga Parkway and 79 South as well as the unappealing utility sign on the median. In response to Commissioner Telesio's comment, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed that she explore his concerns. Commissioner Telesio adjourned the Planning Commission meeting in remembrance of Operation Overlord, 63 years ago today. R:\MinutesPCI060607 7 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Assistant City Manager Johnson relayed that if the Planning Commission had a desire, he could request from Council that two Commissioners of the Planning Commission be included in the Infrastructure Beautification Committee meetings. For Assistant City Manager Johnson, Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that the Commission would be in interested in partaking in the Infrastructure Beautification meetings. ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to June 20. 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dennis Chiniaeff Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R\MinutesPCI060607 8 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION JUNE 20, 2007 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, June 20, 2007, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Guerriero, Telesio, and Chairman Chiniaeff. Absent: Harter. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS At this time, Chairman Chiniaeff advised that per the request of the applicant, Public Hearing Item NO.3 will be continued to September 19, 2007. 1 Planninq Application No. PA06-0338. a Development Plan. submitted bv Rick Conroy representing C&R Architects. for a proposed three-storv commercial/office building totalinq 29.409 square feet. located on the southeast corner of Old Town Front Street and 51h Street within the Old Town Specific Plan Associate Planner Damko provided the Planning Commission with a PowerPoint Presentation, highlighting on.lhe following: . Project Description . Location . Site Plan . Elevations . Environmental Determination. Staff also requested the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 90, 33 and 34. R\MinulesPCI062007 Deputy Director of Public Works York clarified the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 33 and 34, noting that the site would be in the Zone A Flood Plane and will need to be flood proofed; relaying that the building will be raised one-foot above the base flood elevation; that staff did not have a concern eliminating Condition of Approval Nos. 33 and 34 due to' it being on the east side of Front Street; that staff would not expect any significant impacts to the flood plan; however, Condition of Approval No. 39 would be in place if there was an impact to the flood plane. In response to Chairman Chiniaeff, Associate Planner Damko noted the following: . That steps will be provided in the arcade . That because of flood control issues on Front Street, a portion of the building will be elevated . That there will be a handicap ramp connected to the brick building, advising that the ramp will be architecturally compatible with the building . That the arcade would be inside the property line. For Commissioner Carey, Associate Planner Damko noted that the building will be a B Occupancy building; and that the proposed project would be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan in that no parking would be required for commercial and/or office uses. At this time, Associate Planner Damko displayed the color board for the Commission to review. Deputy of Public Works York relayed that the proposed project would be a mixed-use project and would be of the opinion that uses would generate a couple-hundred vehicles per day. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposed project. Mr. Bob Hemme, applicant, relayed that the proposed project would be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan guidelines; that savable material from the previous building and would be placed on the new building; and that the building will be a high-end building with quality tenants. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Relaying his overall approval of the proposed project, Commissioner Carey did express some concern with parking. Conveying his overall support of the architecture, Chairman Chiniaeff relayed his concern with the height of the proposed project, and would be of the opinion that the applicant has not met all requirements. . Concurring' with Chairman Chiniaeff, Commissioner Guerriero also expressed concern with the. proposed project creating a canyon affect to the area, and stated that he would also have a concern with parking and traffic. Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that until a policy is established on how to handle three and'four- story buildings, he will no longer be approving these types of projects. R\MinutesPCI062007 2 MOTION: Chairman Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation subject to the modifications to the Conditions of Approval as requested by staff and subject to language being added to Condition of Approval No. 39 imposing that discussion with the Flood Control District be required. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who was absent. PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0338, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A PROPOSED THREE-STORY COMMERCIAL/OFFICE BUILDING TOTALING 29,409 SQUARE FEET GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND 5TH STREET (APN: 922-033-008,099) 2 Planning Application No. PA07-0154. a Site Plan Modification Application. submitted bY Forest City Commercial Development. to chanqe a buildinq footprint. drive aisle. parkinq orientation. and landscaping of the approved Temecula Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. located at the Promenade Mall between Macy's and Edwards Cinema within the Temecula Reqional Center Specific Plan in the City of Temecula bound by Winchester Road to the north. Marqarita Road to the east. Overland Roadto the south and Ynez Road to the west Associate Planner Peters provided a staff report (as per agenda packet), highlighting on the following: . Project Description . Location . Original proposal . Site Plan Modifications . Specific Considerations Condition of Approval Nos. 2, 16, and 34 . Environmental Determination. By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Mr. Lee, representing Forest City Commercial, pointed out the following: , . Valet Parking . Old Drive Aisle . Building Footprint and Old Building Footprint Drop-off Point. For the Planning Commission, Mr. Lee noted that the applicant would be hopeful to start utility relocation in July, noting that the east parking structure would be complete by April, 2008, and the west parking structure will be complete by November, 2008. Mr. Lee, by way of Powerpoint Presentation, demonstrated how the ring-road would interface with the proposed parking structures. R\MinutesPCI062007 3 Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that it would be his opinion that the proposed site plan change will create more problems than what was originally proposed. Mr. Lee advised that the applicant's engineer is currently working with the Public Works Department to address all controlled intersections for ingress and egress. Offering more information, Deputy of Public Works Hughes advised that staff has been working closely with the applicant to address ingress and egress issues; and that staff is working in a positive fashion and would be of the opinion that the changes to the proposed project would not have significant impacts. Reiterating that he will not be approve additional changes to the mall expansion without having resolved the problem of the ring-road, Chairman Chiniaeff stated that the ring-road problems would need to be addressed before he would make modifications to the mall; and suggested that the valet parking be relocated near the Sears Department Store. Mr. Lee noted that after carefully studying valet parking, valet parking would be best situated as proposed. For the record, Assistant City Attorney Lee noted that the ring-road improvement agreement as well as the OPA, will be going to the City Council at the next City Council meeting. In response to Commissioner Telesio's query, Mr. Lee relayed that the drive aisle behind the cinema was "swung out" in order for the intersection to meet halfway between the loop road and Building 1; that in addition, the drive aisle extension of General Kearney North was slightly re- aligned to avoid the extension of Building 1; and that both drive aisle changes required slight modifications to parking landscape fingers and the loss of 29 parking spaces. Mr. Lee also noted that the parking field in front of the Red Robin Restaurant (south of Sears) was reconfigured to allow for valet parking at the entrance to Main Street. Commissioner Telesio and Commissioner Carey expressed concern with the lack of drop-off areas and would be of the opinion that the proposed modifications will create increased negative impacts for the ring-road. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Ms. Nancy Baron, Temecula, expressed concern with the proposed drop-off point, noting that it will create difficulty for the handicap. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Assistant City Manager Johnson noted that although the City Council will be considering the ring-road agreement, the plan will be complete by December, 2007. > Commissioner Guerrie~o stated that currently the ring-road does not work and would not be in favor of approving the proposed modifications without the ring-road configuration being resolved; and expressed his desire to have the mall expanded but not until the ring-road problem is corrected. R:\MinutesPCI062007 4 Due to the lack of information provided, Commissioner Guerriero concurred with Commissioner Carey in that modifications to the mall expansion should not be made until the ring-road problem is addressed. Understanding that there would be a ring-road study in progress, Commissioner Telesio relayed that it would be difficult to approve the proposed modifications when the Commission has not had an opportunity to review the ring-road agreement; and stated that he would not be at ease approving staff's recommendation at this time. Agreeing with fellow Commissioners, Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that it would be his opinion that the valet parking in the new location will not work adequately; relayed that there would not be enough stacking available; and that until the ring-road problem is rectified, it would premature to approve staff recommendation and would be in favor of reviewing the ring-road study before having this item back on the agenda. For the Planning Commission, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that configuration to the ring- road will not be altered; and that Director of Public Works Hughes was of the opinion that the project as currently proposed, would be a better situation and did not see a problem with the proposed modifications. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue Item No. 2 off-calendar until more information regarding the ring-road is available. Commissioner Carey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who was absent. As previously mentioned, Item No.3 was continued to September 19, 2007, as per the request of the applicant. 3 Planninq Application No. PA07-0111. a Maior Modification. submitted bv McArdle's Associate Architects. to an approved Development Plan for Elite's Plaza which includes removinq the at-grade parkinq areas from the first floor of Buildinqs Band C. and replacinq them with approximatelv 11.351 square feet of additional office space for Buildinq B. and approximately 13.680 square feet of additional office space for Buildinq C. reversinq the buildinq footprint of Building C. and adding a 53.763 square foot. three-storv. 132-space parking structure to be built on the east side of the proiect site. located east of Jefferson COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS Chairman Chiniaeff advised that he will not be in attendance of the July 18, 2007, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No reports at this time. R:\MinutesPCI062007 5 ADJOURNMENT At 7:10 pm, Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned to July 18. 2007 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning Dennis Chiniaeff Chairman R\MinutesPCI062007 6 ITEM #2 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: July 18, 2007 PREPARED BY: Christine Damko TITLE: Associate Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning Application Number PA07-0132 is a Development Plan for the construction of a one-story 13,958 square foot commercial building located on the northwest corner of Landings and Village Roads within the Harveston Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: IXI Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial CEQA: o Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) [8J Notice of Determination (Section) 15162, Subsequent EIR D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: James Ferrin, Michael Crews Commercial Development Date of Completion: April 27, 2007 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: July 18, 2007 General Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Zoning Designation: SP-13, Harveston Specific Plan Site/Surrounding Land Use: Medium Density Residential with a mixed use overlay per Harveston Specific Plan Site: Existing Welcome Home Center, parking lot, landscaping North: South: East: West: Existing Single-Family Residential Existing Cape May apartments Existing day care facility Harveston Lake Lot Area: 106,896 (2.54 acres) Total Floor Area/Ratio: 17.7% Landscape Area/Coverage: 48,142 square feet/45% Parking Required/Provided: 95 spaces required/95 spaces proposed BACKGROUND SUMMARY On April 27, 2007, James Ferrin representing Michael Crews Commercial Development, submitted Planning Application PA07-0132 for review. On May 24, 2007, staff met with the applicant to discuss architecture and site plan issues. On June 7, 2007, the applicant resubmitted revised plans. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan " The Welcome Home Center, parking lot, pedestrian pathways, driveways, light standards, and landscaping were previously approved by the Planning Commission under a separate permit and already exist onsite. The current project proposes to construct a 13,958 square foot single story commercial building. The project conforms to the development regulations listed in the Harveston Specific Plan. There are no minimum lot area requirements or floor area ratio (FAR) requirements within the Specific Plan. Instead, to promote an urban environment, the Specific Plan requires a zero lot line for the front and side setbacks, and a ten-foot rear building setback to create a buffer between the residential and commercial uses. The project G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0132 Harveston ViliagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 2 will include re-striping the existing parking lot and constructing an additional trash enclosure to the site. The Harveston Specific Plan envisioned the site to be pedestrian friendly and a place for the community to gather. With this in mind, it was imperative for the applicant to provide outdoor pedestrian plazas and seating areas. The project proposes three distinct plazas/seating areas along Village Road. The first area located on the main entry corner of the development consists of roughly 200 square feet of space that will be separated by an existing low brick wall and landscaping. The second area, located near the center of the site, will be covered by the proposed building's solid patio cover and will consist of roughly 500 square feet. The third area will be located on the corner of Village and Landing Roads and will consist of roughly 600 square feet. A trellis feature, potted plants, and a water feature on this corner will enhance this area. Architecture The proposed development is consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan. The project meets the height requirements of 50 feet and will screen all roof top mechanical equipment. The proposed architectural style continues the eclectic "Cape Cod" architectural theme which exists through out the Harveston Development. The applicant designed the building to integrate the existing architecture of the adjacent Welcome Home Center, ABC Day Care facility, and the Cape May apartments while at the same time creating an exciting and unique neighborhood commercial experience. The applicant has paid careful attention to the elevations ensuring that four sided architecture is represented. Details such as dramatic roof line variations including dormers and slanted roof lines, varying first and second story elements, decorative windows with shutters, various window shapes and sizes, decorative trellis features, and decorative lighting are used to create the look of this building. Building materials such as hardi plank siding and shingle siding painted in sage greens and reds are used along with brick veneer accents on the low walls, fountain, and existing planters on Village Road. An asphalt shingle roof material in a fossil gray color is proposed for the roof to match the existing Welcome Home Center. The footprint of the building includes variations and setbacks on both the front and rear of the building ranging from two to 15 feet. Landscapinq Although the majority of the landscaping already exists, the project does propose new landscaping around the building. Magnolia trees in 36" boxes, Date Palms, Shrubby Yew Pines in 15-gallon sizes, Rosemary in one-gallon sizes, and India Hawthorn species in five- gallon sizes are proposed including various sizes of potted plants. The landscaping plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan. Access. Circulation. and Parkinq The Department of Public Works has analyzed the proposed traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City General Plan EIR and the Harveston Specific Plan EIR. The Fire Department has also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency vehicles to the site. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 3 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2007 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved EIR and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Development Plan PA07-0132, based upon the findings and with the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the Medium Density Residential (LM) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The project is located within the Harveston Specific Plan, which designates the parcel as Low Medium Density Residential with a Mixed Use Overlay. The Mixed Use Overlay allows for commercial uses to be permitted. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with the existing structures. The proposed development is consistent with the HalVeston Specific Plan. The proposed architectural style continues the eclectic "Cape Cod" architectural theme which exists through out the HalVeston development. The applicant designed the building to integrate the existing architecture of the adjacent Welcome Home Center, ABC Day Care facility, and the Cape May apartments while at the same time creating an exciting and unique neighborhood commercial experience. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public hecdth, safety, and general welfare. The Welcome Home Center, parking lot, pedestrian pathways, driveways, light standards, and landscaping were previously approved by the Planning Commission under a separate permit and already exist onsite. The current project proposes to construct a 13,958 square foot single story commercial building. The project conforms to the development regulations listed in the HalVeston Specific Plan and the Development Code. The project will include re-striping the existing parking lot and constructing an additional trash enclosure to the site. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project have been reviewed utilizing the Mixed Use Overlay G:IPlanning\2007\PAor-Q132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 4 standards of the Harveston Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 4. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 9 G:IPlanning\2007IPA07"0132 HalVeston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston ViliagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 6 City of Temecula I PA07-0132 I Legend ...._:;:; N o , 55 110 220 330 , Feet GlS T,~~EC}lL^ '- This map was made by the City ~Temeo.JIa Geographic Infonnatioo System. The map is derived fi'om base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Depar1ment and lhe Transportation end land Management Agency of Riverside Ccu'rty. The City of Temewla assumes no warranty orlegal respmsibility for the informatioI1 contained on ItIis map. Data and information represented on this map a:e SlAlject to update and moo:ilicatbn. The Geographic lrtormation System and olher SOlrOeS should be queried for lhe most current irlormation. This map is not ror reprint or resale. R\GIS\.4,aronM\SMS Templates\sms_template.mxd 700 F... ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 7 '1::l l::l ~ ~ l2i '$ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... 'f ~ ~ c .... .... j ~ .... ~ ~ ;: c .... .... l:i ~ ~ .... '" $ ~ .~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ;:l ~ ~ o .... .... I:;l ;:> ~ \:.l ~ t: ~ I~ ~_...- --.-- -.--.... -- SMaIJ F'1!lf'!Yi ..... ! , _ I I I i'l ul II1I1 I I HI j , "i9 I ; I ; I : ;' 'id ! ~ I I'l,!l i UIi '~ 'I ~i.llll rH" z Id II' I,' ,Il, :Ii I! ii.., '.' ~,I.llh.tliiUU i1ilI.II11111 ~ I ~! I, n _ I I td III dl ,'I! ~ I I I j I ~ Ii I 1111,11 _1OIIUIIJ.l1DOlI_llIO'l .. .., 1JflUbJ!JvJ 'tJjn3mla,L af1VJJJ(1; u01saruvjE iI! ! ill I! lh,ll .1Ih h alllj !' @,II ,! 2 ' gl l ~I I i I 1I'Ii i ... hll 1'_.1 'l'll"ll,!"'I m '" 1,1,1,1,1, ill !II i 1I1I1I1I1I III I, ,II II ,I, II d d ~----_. _ _ _J _.1 __ __ ---. _u_____ _ -'- _ ~I_"""'--'" . j I I I -'~--l 1.0'/.0'9 .fJv):WibtI:Qf) I ! . I I q I u1J]ilJ"P.Sril. ~ I :1 ,. II ., I il !! III . 'i 111"llllI! ',' . Will'" ! 1IIIllllilllll ~ 11I11I11I111I1 I Iii . III . " ,. II-; I lill' !Iili,' " JII., 11 o -._._-~-.."... .....alll '7 - I! . , i I I I Ii ~I II ~I Is I -;1 Hi ~r" I II J I I! ! ~ -- ~ ...~_u_ a . ~ , ~ ~ '" ~ ~. ~ .:1 c::)~ I~ "'o:,;'1lo:l...~.."U'" -- S"""J r>e'l'!i'I ~ DIUJOj'lD:) 'oln~;)w;)l jD ,Ill:) a5ell!^ UOISaAJeH NVld 3dItJSON'Vl 11 Ii I ~ I , II. ~ "Iii Z I,i! :s Q. I:n w Q. 1111 <( III tl (/) 0 Z :s -r-: Iii, I,ll' i'I:I! ;1; III ~r=r I -I' ' ',I !!i L - --... ---- , ! ~ :'t';1 II III I!. , U 11 I ! ~ ~ . I I V I I i! 'I' i ~ll l. I h !II II li',hll! "'I'" ,. , ",- oil! I ~.. ~ .= h , , , , (~ , : ! ___~~ /__J ________________________L_____l_________________________~__J - __ __ __ -1~__J________ __ - _, ~ II LJ 'I Ll '. 'I I Ii II' I ",- < 'II '-1.1 iii, i,!, i,ll,ili, !ll"!l'j'!"'! I' I I: II II! I llli1ul ! 'll' Iii, -li.-ll, II!!'; Illl; 11I;!1'; 10 E> e e 1m I !!!! ........ ....".. ~.!!! I , I III Jill! H ;! !.'~ ~1~f I I,ll e!~ @Iq:,!! ! .'i I I I! !!/l ! "I' !I!.. ,'I 1!l1 I; I i:I i =)~ "" I h ';!ii! j } , 'il!' I Il,' I ill' m! Ii i i<,llll,1 i i i in 11111 I: 'Iii ~ I 0.@ .eo. a I ; I , I! Ii \ \ \ \ \ I1ij w .~ ... ~g ...JOO ..JQ >g gZ~ bOg!! 1-00 (Qlf3@ rL-.>~ lJa:!!! Of(C,<( III ~(}:r: .~ lliill m !:: ~l-eJ r::?O~ ~..J~ ...::1 ' eJ ~'";"Q dS~!Ii CD :;> m g C\I(i) I- E: O~ ~g I-:E' Q ,~!f Jl-------, (I) ~1-J.:-----' .....".'01<1. '-''''''' ""o-""....,-...."'.a>o<<x>\_..,W>O\.,..."'''''''J\...''''<,\.,''''''''~ I I~.."I,;, g" I , ! h I,' 'I i II aii1i g o . th, ,-, I . !. ! " - n I A ~~ ,Ilk J I ~ ~ ~ p jl'!;i ~ H!j!~ t K d ..b~l !I U!,;~ II U . ~.i.. .'"l' :1" , j', , II:. # ~--- , L. . F" :! Ii; " ::' , ,:~!"L .j ".~ '! !!:::;I ti;:.!E1' '.. '<\l,.l :::1 iN~...tiil:---IL ~,' ~ '~~ I ~ iii::: r :~ ,~aJ - , ( I , 111\\ Lc~~~~.:.:~~Jr--~4~_'~"~\( \, I +,. ,.' "I- I ~' '" , p: I: 1\ :11: """. \\ \'"' . !ill ~il-~ ' } ~f sf(1- 1- b. l- '. ," 0 ',_ _~~ m , " ! Of ;!-1;---: ~ . .~ 0 s '--~I' ~ ~ w 1 (I) , > ... -I i , \' z ~~ i~Z.. H~gt ~ l/)d; E r ~ w til,! i...J > ~'S <( a:t~ ;;) <(:$0 ~X!:: U z o u ~ . ~ ~ ~ i ill i '! ~ ! 'il Ii ,. i ~~ 5 ., . 'Z Q . i - ~ ~ _.~ - ---~- -.. -.... I~ --- SM3lJ !.1!1jJm All vpuoj1jVJ 'rynJ3W',L ...~~~VJJ.l&.11-~!~!01.~}f; LO'1'9 .lflf!jJvJj <VbJ SUOllVrL3j:J,JO.U31X:v '~I ~! f j , .. i m 11' ~ .. i " ih UH ! i ~i n~ 'i' H~~ , n ii' r i ~~~~ , i j~ ,! , Ui iff Ill! r I n . a: w f- Z W () ~ w ::!! 0 a: g w w ~ ~ Cl ..J Z :> (3 Cl .. z u. ~ Z 0 Z Z ~ 0 0 ~ > ~ W ..J W w I ..J ..J W f- W f- :::J f- if) 0 ~ W if) W ~ 0 .. 0 a;; if) Cl z 0 5 Cl z ~ u. Z 0 ~ > W ..J W I f- a: 0 Z I. H .l ~ _.~ - ---- -.--.... IJ -- 'MaJJI""'P!l'I ....... VlUlojYV:Y'rymawaJ, L0'10'9 aIfV~1V<li<li(JJJ a8VJJ.Z(1._l!?fS~f1.!VJf~___.______u~:~Oj:h , , ,""""'- i ! i , ! i j ~ .. ! , ! i ! ~> i .' i ! -" t::"'C '; . --'- rl , " "r" ,. J, 1':< , ! j / l\ ,1 / , <("- I ! "ir (f) Wv i i [I tb c.... ~ t\,. I, :0 v, i ~ ' I : ~ ; (f)~ I ..;. ,--.. ,g,., , .J yl, .e. ~ ;..;. ....... "' L,-\J } 1 ' n ro"- " ., ) 1 (f) W<o '-- 0 ,I C", '"' :0 ~, t-=-," (f)~ I I.... -,., .- , -, -.' ~_.- _.~~. 0"- \, (f) W<o ....'" (f)": V, , nr'~ ..= 0-- ~~ 'u ! 1M - , _N Ii :00 (f)~' " I .~... . w"- (f) II ~, Wo C<O :oq !I~ if (f)~ " ,I ~ ' , 'nh ,_/" ~. ,.'!,,>' of .>- , l ~"-~ >)" ~ j ~~, lv. I. -'" ~, :0": , ., -- I -' , , I m"- '3 Wo ~ t C'" t :o~ 0 (f)~ .i. '..'Dr n ,.1-'_ r ' ~r c .~" I '('i" I W(f) i', ~, , ,:'; f:j ; t=~ .'(\ "'1 iil'" \J ...,"- ~ \ ; w(f) -- ....0 -<0 , , :0'" . -"- (f)": HI I W(f) CO /: , 'I' h I. :0<0 A, , ~! (f)'" ~j;:;" ...;;,'il.. ., ~ h. .~' 0 ' -..".- .t:- ,-.\I" ","- e.-{ , ~ (f) \~'J ~ ~ f 7fi Wo I; IA. I CN , (/).,: -:l r!: .. , ..... ~, ~ '. e~ ; ~ i I ~ I , , , t ~ ~ o a: W ~ :> Cl z g "- z o ~ > W ...J W .... ~ W ~ --- - --..,- _._-~.. I~ -- SMal;) ]a'"P!W li.6. VlluojYV:J '''InJ3m3.L ._a~VJ}.1(}_!,01S(J~VJC , '" I! , l' mim rl]J im .... , ! ! i I 0.. .~G', ! -'- , '~,~ ,/ iiI 11 !!! !~ II' '!' Ii " Ii.! , .t -r . . , , ! ~, e]i ~ ~ o o LO'LO'9 31f1!~?vJJ<fXl;J U"IJJ JoO$ ;; \ f , ~ ! " I ~ I -~..,;.;;:...--.;..- I~ ~-- SMa!) jO"'PWl All 17!UJo}yvJ'VjnJawaj; LO'LO'9 a/fti~Jv<fJJX1JJ i a BVJJ!t1__~~1Saf1jV }(u ___<J!vla~_ UO~l~,,!!SUOJ ~~/1OJ; -0 , . ~ l 'I ! ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~o <;.. ;>~ o. \;0;" ><. ~ ~ ~ e t . " 1); I H. ~ '-1 i H , '-1 H !~ ! ~ " ~: ! .. ,. n I ~ , " ~ CJ CJ <:l <:l 1.__ ~ ~ .., .. ~~ ~ !! ~~ !~ ~o .,., " .f! .' ~.~ '1' .,.,..., hI~ ~~ ~H! .!I~ UH Ii !I ~ B 1); ~ b ;>; ~~ . , H I' ~ t ,. !~ Ii HI ;i>~ m i . I i I I~I:\~:j';:6i] t.--.:-. ."...._'.~. -"~'-'-"'._-'-~.-.'" -...-..---.....-.-..-.- -".--.-...------- -.-.-.........-. .- .-- . --...- - _'''_..__'.'''_'.U'___'..''__ Ii f~! II; I'" ,~~ ill! , ! , '.-. ! .,,;../ ::;D3~ . ~ , . , ~ \ i ~ ! ~ I ~ I fil ~ i t I;l '-1 ~ "'~o .' ..., v~J "'''' ~ I:; ~ I;l ~ ~ ~ Cj, , ~ " CJ <:l ~ ~ '-1. 5~ ~~ ~ I:; ~ I;l ~ ~ '" , ~ CJ <:l ~ ~ <..l. M .,.,~ ~~ ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-_ G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT.doc 8 PC RESOLUTION NO. 07- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0132, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE-STORY 13,958 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF LANDINGS AND VILLAGE ROADS WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (APN: 916-560-006) Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On April 27, 2007, James Ferrin representing Michael Crews Commercial Development filed Planning Application No. PA 07-0132 (Development Plan) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 18, 2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07-0132 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City; The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the Medium Density Residential (LM) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The project is included with the Harveston Specific Plan, which designates the parcel as Low Medium Density Residential with a Mixed Use Overlay. The Mixed Use Overlay allows for commercial uses to be permitted. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with the existing structures. The proposed development is consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan. The proposed architectural style G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston Village\Planning\PC RESOLUTION NO.doc I continues the eclectic "Cape Cod" architectural theme which exists through out the Harveston development. The applicant designed the building to integrate the existing architecture of the adjacent Welcome Home Center, ABC Day Care facility, and the Cape May apartments while at the same time creating an exciting and unique neighborhood commercial experience. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The Welcome Home Center, parking lot, pedestrian pathways, driveways, light standards, and landscaping were previously approved by the Planning Commission under a separate permit and already exist onsite. The current project proposes to construct a 13,958 square foot single story commercial building. The project conforms to the development regulations listed in the Harveston Specific Plan and the Development Code. The project will include re- striping the existing parking lot and constructing an additional trash enclosure to the site. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project have been reviewed utilizing the Mixed Use Overlay standards of the Harveston Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be consistent with the previously approved EIR for the Harveston Specific Plan and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIR's). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA07-01312, a Development Plan for the construction of a one-story 13,958 square foot commercial building located on the north west corner of Landings and Village Roads within the Harveston Specific Plan subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A. attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0132 Harveston Village\Planning\PC RESOLUTION NO.doc 2 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of July 2007. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of July 2007, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston ViIlage\Planning\PC RESOLUTION NO.doc 3 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2007\P AD? -0132 Harveston ViUage\Planning\PC RESOLUTION NO.doc 4 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . Planning Application No.: PA07.0132 Project Description: A Development Plan for the construction of a one.story, 13,958 square foot commercial building located on the northwest corner of Landings and Village Roads within the Harveston Specific Plan Assessor's Parcel No. 916-560-006 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Commercial See Harveston Specific Plan Development Agreement See Harveston Specific Plan Development Agreement Expiration Date: July 18, 2007 July 18, 2009 Approval Date: WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-Four Dollars ($1,864.00) which includes the One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollar ($1 ,800.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48- hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VlllagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07_2.doc 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveslon VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 2 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final Conditions of Approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel ofthe City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. A separate building permit shall be required for all sign age. A Sign Program will be required and will be reviewed by the Planning Commission. 7. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish. or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in whiCh case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Main exterior paint Accent paint Color Sherwin Williams SW6178 Clary Sage Sherwin Williams SW2839 Roycroft Copper Red Sherwin Williams SW7006 Extra White Accent paint on wood trim, gutters, doors, columns, trellis, shutters G:IPlanning\2007\PA07.0132 Harveston ViilagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07_2.doc 3 Canvas material in Secret Garden with white edge piping Elk Roofing- Capstone series Class A asphalUfiberglass color is Fossil Gray 9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. Awnings Roof 10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 11. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. All trash enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the building architecture and contain an overhead trellis. Public Works Department 12. A Grading Permitfor precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 13. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction wjthin an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 14. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 15. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging offsile or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. 16. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City priortothe initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment mechanisms. 17. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99-0418) as approved on August 14, 2001. 18. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 (PAOO-0295) as approved on August 14, 2001. G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-ll132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 2.doc .4- Building and Safety Department 19. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 20. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF.) Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 21. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 22. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 23. Developments with Multi-tenant Buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 24. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 25. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that the indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday~Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays 26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. Site plan to indicate all suites numbering in direct correlation with addressing and proposed buildings. Fire Prevention Bureau 27. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 5 28. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 hour duration (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A). 29. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feetfrom any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 30. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). Community Services Department 31. The trash enclosure shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 32. All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 33. All existing pedestrian access to the Lake Park shall remain in place. G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 2.doc 6 - PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:IPlanning\2007lPA07-Q132 Harveston ViiiageIPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 7 Planning Department 34. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. 35. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavationlconstruction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at hislher sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult andlor authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeologicallcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeologicallcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." Public Works Department 36. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 37. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 38. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 39. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 40. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0132 Harveston ViliagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 8 41. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. 42. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Planning Department b. Department of Public Works 43. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 44. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 45. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention Bureau 46. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2). 47. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). 48. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of nolless than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 49. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc . 9 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-D132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 10 Planning Department 50. 51. 52. 53. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. All downspouts shall be internalized. / Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." e. One copy of the approved grading plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. i. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to- head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is nol!o look like an after- thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 11 54. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limitsd to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 55. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". 56. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Public Works Department 57. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 58. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 59. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 60. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated August 28, 2001. Building and Safety Department 61. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 62. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Fire Prevention Bureau 63. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans directly to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be - G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 12 presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual 10t.(CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). 64. Prior to building permit, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902). 65. Prior to issuance of building permit fire sprinkler .plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 66. Prior to issuance of building permit fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Community Services Department 67. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 68. On the Site Plan, page 1.0 below EXIST WELCOME CENTER contains the wording "High Density Residential." This wording is to be deleted prior to issuance of building permits. G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-Q132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 13 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-Q132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 14 Planning Department 69. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning: 70. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 71. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 72. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 73. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 74. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 75. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Public Works Department 76. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. G:IPlanningI2007lPA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 15 77. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 78. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention Bureau 79. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 80. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters andlor numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-f<lmily residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 901.4.4). 81. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9). 82. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10). 83. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4). 84. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4). . 85. . Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. G:\PlanningI2007lPA07-Q132 Harveslon VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 16 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07 _2.doc 17 \ 86. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated May 4, 2007, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name - G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglMASTER COA-BY TIMING MECH 01.07_2.doc 18 o CGJNTY OF RIVERSIDE . HEAL! rI SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City of Temecula Planning Department clo Christine Damko PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 l"" /.;"i' ';'.. .. , /t'..... ~.....; tJ .f ". t;, /'14 y ~y. .', C p 20W ~/' '" ''"'- ... '~J fl- ."..,~ ""-"""!i.a''':"~'''' .-'r.?':I_:-'" :-..: h..", -..... . I .' 4 May 2007 RE: PA07-0132 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the P A07- 0132 for the Development Plan (DP) for Michael Crews Commercial Development for the construction of a one story commercial building for the Haraveston Specific Plan. The development plan application for the 13,958 square foot building located on the north West comer of Landing Road and Village Road (APN 916-560-006) shall be connected to a potable water line and sanitary sewer from the closest purveyor. A water and sewer availability letter shall be required by the City ofTemecula at time of building plan submittal to the City. Any food vending or restaurant.use of the building shall require food plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. If your have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.955.8980 ~~ Gregor Dellen ch, REHS EHS07l592 Local Enforcement Agency. PO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX (909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 tandUseand Water Engineering. p.0. Box-1206, Riverside; CA 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8980. FAX (909) 955-8903. 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Roor. Riverside, CA 92501 ATTACHMENT NO.4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING G:IPlanning\2007IPA07-0132 Harveston VillagelPlanninglPC STAFF REPORT. doc 9 Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: CEQA Action: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA07-0132, Harveston Village Michael Crews Development, Inc. Northwest corner of Landings and Village Roads within the Harveston Specific Plan A Development Plan application for the construction of a one-story 13,958 square foot commercial building The proposed project is consistent with the EIR that was prepared for thp. Harveston Specific Plan therefore, is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162 - Subsequent EIR Christine Damko, Associate Planner City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 July 18, 2007 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. ., .~ t(: .. E,t,~,yCNH. \~" tj-r"O r- 'I !& ',...--1 "', Ii. i ~ \ r-----i1!, I \':; .--, l~l' ...ml i .'-'.-.-j I ------...., I I I i ;' .-- J /" - --____'rAJ"..'Ii.:,.r"W\1,1' 1."" . . ~ <tYif"',cr I , , I / l :?j' i;y i / ~ ,I Iff" , s ;' ,I - i ;/ / / --------~- G:\Planning\2007\PA07..Q132 Harveston Village\PlaIUling\Notice of Public Hearing.doc , j-- . / . ITEM #3 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION July 18, 2007 Dana Schuma TITLE: Associate Planner Planning Application No. PA06-0278, a Development Plan to construct three professional office buildings totaling 38,501 square feet on 2.8 acres located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road [8J Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: o Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial ~ Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) o Notice of Determination (Section) 15332 32 In-Fill Development o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Kal Pacific & Associates Date of Completion: September 18, 2006 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: July 18, 2007 General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) SitelSurrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant and single-family residences Multi-family residences Commercial Center Single-family residences Lot Area: 2.8 gross acres/120,374 square feet Total Floor Area/Ratio: 38,501 SF/0.32 FAR Landscape Area/Coverage: 35,438 SF/29 percent coverage Parking Required/Provided: 128 required/153 provided 123 standard 5 handicapped/147 standard 6 handicapped BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. A pre-application for the professional office complex was submitted on April 5, 2006. Development comments for the pre-application were provided on May 4, 2006. An application for a Deve.lopment Plan was submitted on September 18, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on November 2, 2006, to discuss site design, landscaping, architecture, and other departmental issues. The applicant submitted revised plans on January 12, 2007. A second DRC letter was sent on February 13, 2007 addressing architectural concerns. Revised plans were submitted on March 21, 2007, which addressed Planning staffs architectural recommendations. A third letter was sent on April 20, 2007 addressing the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and minor site plan changes. Final plans and the WQMP for the project were submitted on June 11,2007. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 2 ANALYSIS Site Plan The project proposes to construct three professional office buildings on the northeast side of the site. The buildings are situated adjacent to the street edge with the parking lot located behind the buildings. The project as designed conforms to all the development regulations of the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) listed in the City's Development Code, including building height, setbacks, and floor area ratio (FAR). The site is adjacent to a future condominium development to the south and residentially zoned property to the north. The maximum building height allowed in the De Portola Road PDO zone is 35 feet when a site is located within 50 feet of residentially zoned property. The main office building (Building 1) will be two stories and 32'4" in height. Building 2 will be 27' in height and Building 3 will be 22'10" in height. Both Buildings 2 and 3 will be one story. Consistent with the PDO development standards, the project proposes a minimum 15 foot setback from adjacent residentially zoned property, 10 feet from adjacent non-residentially zoned property, and 20 feet from Margarita Road. The proposed 0.32 floor area ratio (FAR) meets the target FAR of 50 percent for the PDQ-8 zone. Access. Circulation. and Parkinq Two vehicle access points are proposed to service the site. Vehicle access will be taken from an access driveway located off of De Portola Road and from a right in/right out access driveway located off of Margarita Road. The proposed site layout provides for a clear path of travel throughout the site and accommodates for future reciprocal access with the adjacent western parcel. Enhanced textured paving has been provided at the driveway entrances to slow vehicles as they enter the site. The proposed project requires 128 parking spaces and provides 153 parking spaces (147 standard 6 handicapped spaces), plus bicycle parking, which exceeds the parking requirements of the Development Code. The parking lot provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site, including service vehicles and emergency vehicles. The Fire Department has reviewed the site plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. The Public Works Department has reviewed the site plan and has determined that the project, as conditioned, provides adequate circulation and access. Staff has analyzed the potential traffic impacts of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The project has also been conditioned to comply with a request from the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) for tre construction of a new bus stop/along Margarita Road (COA # 94). Architecture The proposed project is consistent with the requirements in PDO-8 and the Development Code, and exceeds the Design Guidelines standards. The proposed office buildings will feature a Mediterranean architectural style with a smooth stucco exterior in two colors. The body of the building will be off-white accented with a light brown stucco base and window trims. The Mediterranean architectural details provided on all four sides of each building include wood trellises with pre-cast columns, arched top accent windows, wrought iron accents, decorative pop outs and decorative lighting. The buildings will have a 4:12 roof pitch with low G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 Oe Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 3 profile concrete tiles, roof overhangs, and exposed rafter tails. The buildings are further enhanced with various vertical and horizontal breaks in the wall planes, recessed entries, varying roof height, and a dynamic asymmetrical design that breaks up the massing and creates visual interest. Landscapinq The landscape plan exceeds the landscape requirements of PDO-8, Development Code and City-Wide Design Guidelines. The project includes 35,438 square feet of landscaping (29%), which exceeds the 25 percent minimum required by PDO-8. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen onsite parking areas and effectively soften the building elevations. The project proposes to plant 112 trees ranging in size between 48-inch box and 15 gallon. Ninety percent of the trees will be 24-inch box size or larger. Over 9,000 square feet of decorative paving for additional pedestrian amenities has been incorporated into the landscape design. Two decorative pedestrian walkways lead to the two centrally located common areas which serve as courtyard entries to the office buildings. The courtyard areas create a dynamic path and focal entry point complete with decorative paving, a trellis structure, a fountain, and a statue art piece. The enhanced pedestrian walkways allow for enjoyable and convenient pedestrian access from the street and parking lot. The plan includes a decorative equestrian trail along the north side of the site adjacent to De Portola Road consistent with the City of Temecula Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. A public art piece has also been proposed for the northeast corner of the site visible from the De Portola Road and Margarita Road intersection which will be reviewed for approval separately by the Community Services Commission. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 7, 2007, and mailed to the property owners within a 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In-fiff Development Projects). 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designations and regulations. The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan Professional Office land use designation and the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) zoning designation. The project is consistent with all development regulations, including setbacks, height, and FAR requirements for the site. 2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and is substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is proposed un a 2.8 acre site surrounded by existing commercial and residential development. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 4 3. The project site is not known to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Professional office development was anticipated for the project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8). The project has been found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR. 4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Professional office development was anticipated for the project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR. 5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existil"g services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (17.05.010.F) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with the General Plan and with the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-B) zoning designation because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies and standards for professional office development. The proposed office use is permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-B). The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including site design, lot coverage, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, and standards intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which protects the public's health, safety, and general welfare. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 5 ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 7 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8 3. PC Resolution 07-_ - Blue Page 9 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 4. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 10 G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 VICINITY MAP G:IPlanningI2006IPA06-Q278 Oe Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Slatt Report.doc 7 1- -{ ~ 7"></>,{~J~"X\ \ \ \JJ.J I I I IL--'::; '-/~ \,_ .( / /"./ / ~~ - '.. ~GO __ --II~ r- \, ~~ /",,: "< / ./-/ _ tS'-V~" - \. >V....OflP'0!-.---,.. TiT i \ '\ \ / /,..... ',,' / ~, '"'Vl"J"~" V ::..~,,'""'--\ \. \ I ,_ ,. "'"",,",,,.' :\./':o-? \/0~('" \'..__t_.-.l-L_..L_l...--L__.l,0\ '\ ......... . / "'-.4t<t,"-., / ... '\. -', -,' \"f\ " ,,";''01>'' /'\ /..'--...... /~ -.--'t \~\ '>.~~' . > / '. '.~ \ '.'<9:'\ ' \ '2:. ~ ,"~1- , --:. _.---"'-YIP v / /' " , ^ )"~. - --- ~_ --.-- \, , ' 1'- 1 ~,-'\, i ,;- f \ \ ""',- 1. j'0/ '/-"---...." I .' \) \\ /' J iI" ..... ">- t ' / ) v/ ,1-\- "",,/ ~ '/ u 1'_ X' ~ '\ --.......~'..Y / L ~ - \/ ) ;..//......Y >f:!......, v/ / ;Z ~/ I ,/:,~s:;""",;;1 ;( // ," " I' /, ~ / / ,/. y ", .....J / /.......... """,- I / , /, V j.,,' ""', "" I / / 'c'''''-\ \ /' ,r '~""/~"':''- '- / ,,/ / // , \ '. < -"'1'-1(. ',,I ,-.... '! / '. \ .,.-/ /" "', o.s. -01'.l/ '/ / ' \ ,...- . / "'" -, / / \ -( ,. '. ,/, ";j7,i -,~/ 1', \.,//\ '/',,- '-/~,' , "- i , )'~' ~. /~(j!/,-_. ". /" . /v/ "- ,", > 0,/'... . ,"T- ',//" ',./ I . / \ \, ~> /(, ',\/ _,' /1 " '\ \_~/ (~\, ;/ / / \{.~\ \// / \ \\\\-) ~// \ \ -. ./ \ I, .---'-......... ~., \ \ --- ~'\ ,~ ......... \, ~.) :,\"OV'-fl.O --_/, " '" .--.- e.POR ___--I '" "" --" Q,..- \ '\ ..... '", .......... ....., "'......, j ,I v , ____~r I / --...... .' / '.'_.1 I 'I. _ '. CA.(-~. '. . (€'.REOON~:-\J' ~-'-~'-._----" ',,,- '-, ,i'", ~,<:>O--" >-,l::;. . ~~' ~ 00 ,/ Q'.' .: q;/ . '. '<" .,', '\-. " , , ' ., ' \. ". .', .~ "% \ ~ '\.. ~ " / / \"" .- ,- "- ." ""'~~ /' / Project Site / / \ , '> / ., \ .........' \ / n I ' /- \ -.,j I I .. <5 ~. , to'\ \~ -, "~ ~. / // .~........,.~._. .----~_.---~ ,- \ \ " , '.1' ,- - \ /-/ .--/ '-- I I , , ,--/- \-- ---- , .------------\ \ '----\ ---- \ ------,,""'OC-O""\' /\ . \\. \. i\. ,S-\....------/>_ ~ \ \ .\.-~~ ~--\ \ \ ld'-.......----.........-""'.\ \ \ \ . \ \ \ \ \ ~ / \...........-::L.........~ -~\\ w/\..........-- \ // ///..-------:-...-----:: s=\\~\\~\ ,~l-/ '11_/- ~ \ // '\ \\\ \ \ ........-"/ ~ / '/ \ \ ~ /~::~\ \ /C ,_\/.\ /~ \, '> ) \ ~./" ,(0, \ /- ~"'''~ \ ~------- ~.~ \~\ .~ ) ~ \ ./"/ r ~.,@~-\I, \e. ~\ . j "+"'lr,. ~ 0\1. \ 1/'-. (C .//"/\(O\...J <e, / \ ~ ~#/r-......r '.' \ 1.---L, ~ \ .,...-/--'---. ___Jr: -,\1'.-1. I '-, >:;}v / ~". .@->. \;;'~~=\li~/--- ~/(~~ ~\ ~ \ \ <,j'/( , . ~ . ,'. '--....... \<'t':,.\ ~/ \:;O( . \ \ v\ \ \ ~o~/ '" . ~ '. ""' N -\"%\--/-\ \.~\ " \ \ /'\' \ 125 250 500 750 1,000 ..,.l-. , r---- \0\/ --\ '. \ 'j \ \__--\ \ \ \ /- - F~et -' \ .--- ,.--<;' / --~- \~_.---- \ \ \ \ \c~-/ \ \ \ ----/...-- .Y' /" ,/' \ \ \ \ ,//.~\ , 1,- , / /" /, .._----\ " -- k I \ -- _.- -.. ..-0;":"-;::::::--<- ......" /" /. ." -,.", " ........... ...........~ / I / '.------ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 8 ~ ~ ~ jOI ~:z:~ ~b~ ~.~~ tl It., ~\C~ o ~ti .... o ..... _~ll!::!. llNlIW1lI"dDlId . i . i I I . 00 I I . :1 ... I ~. I ~l I:l ! ,. 0, I !i i I I:l :; ~ II . , :~ . ~ -, 3! .' :; / /! / , / 1\fl::Jb'3WWO:J 600-090-696 Wd'V ~---~~:- ~ 0" lVIOt:f3NWOO J.J.O-090-696 N" d''( _~Ol!VK \" I ~l ~, " I:l j11 ! ~ N ~ P. ~ l!l ~ ci qz ~ ~I~ b ~ _~ ",,!j E-o <Il ~~ :5?5:3 ~. U t.> ~. ~i ~ ~ I" j. , ~. , I .~ I ;! I il! 1~lli ~ Q I =1 ~. " I:l , ~ '" Q 0: " !i!l~liW!lii If! '!u!~ill IIHlH\!"'~I' ~ I" " . .1 III j'i' ,.:! ,I:i I" ~.!, ..... ~'I' ,_.1 ~ i!l! ~ illt Ill! ! n~n II I II !~ I'II!!I B ~ Ii ~ II I I I I L ~'I!! =', !! ! J ~ I UI'l ~!, ~ ! IIII~I II ~ !il. ~ II I I ~ I i ~lll! d'; ill; ,__,,~"._..,'w_.. ~ D s~;;;;~S~~'d'~ ~ I " J 'j ,! 80S lli "I ii, I i:l ! Hil ; ! ,! ~ II 111~ ~l B 1'" l' ~ ,"" ~~~~~!~ III -~ ~ qj .. Iil~ ; ll; ~ ~;; ~ - ~ fll ~ h II,' ,,' i '"I '! r~1 .' .Ii ,; ;' ' 'I I! "".1 ;. I,' j~.. i .,I!i'! ld . lLlll 11 I II I . h," ! ! I II II ! ;""-'11 " '. 5 ~- - - i [ i - , , . !! ! ., ! l i . I I Ill. Iii! , l,~ !~il " ~ ~ ~ to , ,I . II .1' I ~ III ; ., ~; :~I .. . li'l i 1!!"@1 I I I h 111'11.[111 l? .. i'! ~ E ft ~ !I;I!il ~ii ~ ~ I'" 1,. . i6 o z 0; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 w I': ~ ~:i l> i ~ l! i llBl h (/) ~ 0 z ::; S.J 0 I> g g ~ ~:l!~~ ~l!~~"~~O!l~ll!l? g:!0~H:3npl en ;tljldillHdl ;P II ~... oJ If .. "- I" .i:' '" "- Z: Ii: ~ ~ 8 w 15 8888@@8@@@(;)0Cf" T- CJ i..... L._ ~ I.' ii! II' ii'll ,110.1 !iiiil ,I ~:I , . 10 ~ ~ , . I , E e lil : 0: g I ! '! ' ~ f ~ 0 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! i - Q ~ ~ M ~ l . .00 DI~II a:m III I Iii -I" ---1j'1 "1----1 , JIII!l : jl i; I I I I I I I I 1 e I I 'I I I I I III I ,. avc~ .'oaOdla . . I!I .. . . ic . . ~~ @ ClDD ~~. ~i' ~ .' i~~ .. .j e ~. E ~Q~ . . . \L .;' I i ~ . ~ 1-'-"'- ~ ." \ \, .... lc' \ ..-"1-_ ~ <' .... --'" l /......: ~'" ,."- ~"'''''" ,.\ '\", ~ -"' ~":,' ,,/ \ I I t B I 9 q, I 6 I I!I I I p l I i ~~~.,..g~~':-"'@ ~INN'(1dS3UI1l:JW'.:lNOl1V3~~ lIOl'~D!WO/!I'lO :nlfl1031lHOijV JcN:)SQNVl dIlOI!l) Vll8rfVHlV d13Ol:llOS31::l1VJJd't':J 0fI'I Oil A3Cl VT'103'8.l e4W:) -~- ~~Q'l'QIl:BIlBl::M'ACUlI' cici >> .. . . -. . ~t tti~: ~ ~-5 ~ '0 3OI%lO 'dO!ld 'fl()JHOd 3(] .~ I I! I", 9' i J I I lllil. ~'''9~ 11i:ll,1 Ii!: Iii I dl!l;l! ima I. q. ~ Ii ~ I' 9 ! ~ ' avoo YlOJ.I:IOd 3CJ i ! I ! I I III; ~ l!i l!I l!i . III t:t:t:t: lit: a Ii if it II it p~ns ~ ! d ~ Ii 11111 Ii ,II s ~~. . , ~, I ill i i ..11 , !Hi ! I , i '! ~bb ~ ~ ..~~ . I pm , I l i I m II 1m . ! I . i m ii ........ ~ ! ".. , , . . i ! :: =:: ~ III II ~ ~$I!i~ " D . . i l Ii i .. .... . I i ii 1; ~ ~);); ...... . ! i Ii,! III ! i I III " I I I !II !I II i II I II 'h II ! I I I; Ii III I II I! I ; III ill I . i' ; ~ i ~~l t "I . &: uf.. R .ihdd. luhhll ! 0Cl8 0 0e0 f ~ I !:JOe @ I ~ Z :) n.. ell z. ~. i <( I , ...J I ! n..1 >-1 0:" <(! Z' :::d ...Ji ~I n.., I . i I I I I I . I I i , I I I i I I i I , I I . I I i I . I I i I I I I . ._-,,~.._-,,~~., ~... D oo:;;:tIv;)__!'j.l!I'S'_ll~Ol;L~. a'..... S8lBpOSSV ~ d>l ..; I __ I Illl!l, ,I@~! ~ II ph [Ill ~ ~ II ~!! fIlii ~Ii \., II ~~d ~ ~ ill I" ! iHI I 'II!! 1 0 !ii!l! I - ; l' ; 0 , "-" ; ., ~~ , J~ ~ .. ~, , , ,I ~ . ---~ ,I ~ ! " . , ,. 1 ., ; w , . II q ~ , I , I I 8-- @--, @-- ~!. _..--i.!l -1'4------- nl , ~ , , -1---+-- , , I m I , , -1---T- _L _L , , I ." I I ,n! I _1_1_ 1-1 I ,:j:: J:;~. N @-- m u!. !l! , , I I I I #!- I f ---r-mTuT , I I iI' tol.<:! ~ H II? I;;,~ : 14 !:j if!!l; JH o ~I ~ " @- @-- ~ " u ~~ ~ 1;";'1 IH .... ..~ 0( ~ c1 o " ." 5H u @--- " ~ 0 0 z 0( U 0 E - - .. ~ . ~ . 0 N ~. ~ M I llllll "~ I" ,I ~:I ll~i~~ l ii, Ii Hell! 9. il, ~ .- !N, ., J 'I. '. I, , ,d'l " l" :2 llll,ih II! "5 ~H iiiiif m ,Ill ~ ..." .... . E <0 ----g ----@ n n '" '" '" , U ---- , -~----8 n [-' '" " 'I' .' u -" " , -e.=:l-___ -I~-trr i " '" ~ 'I' , u Ii h , 0 z I 0 Ir-, It ]-111 ~ ~ , " " . 'I' .' < ~ ---~ M 0 fl n [-' ~, . '" " I '.' " O. ~ U -" <, ---- --t- O! , sill n [-' ," " '" .' U , 01 " - - ----€.l sa~g;;~~Md~ @j) 01 0-' 01 @-- 0)-- 8---- @--- @--- @-- @-- -' , I , , I I , , I II! I , , -t----+--- I I I , , , -t-,-;--+- -t-o I In I I I I I I" ~3 -ilr-- " , , +----+ , , I III I -t---t- ", .. I" _-1!..__ III , I ---~----.---- III I w -----@ - ----g -@ r-.-~ ~ ~ ~ . " ~ o 8~ ., ~ ---8 --G z ~ . . ~ o ~, ~; - ----0 --@ ~ . " ~ o 8~ ., " r-- L_' - ---€.l --@ ._-,,~"'--,,~-.. ~ D oes;mY.:l.,..,......J..~oqons'_-"'I$"'PU!MOU~t : ... S8lepOSS\f 'l? d)l I II~H@~ j jl'(11 ~!! I,m It! ~ Jill !l,;j': '" al!.. ..oil ~ IH @- @-- @---- @-- @- @- @---- @- @---- @---- @)----- @------- f -.............,---- I " 10 -I I l' I 01 iJ I j, I ---l 1 I Ill! I, " 'r 'I .f '" , 10 9 I" !! ." si! i'. I; r "' ~---------------------i , , I OJ I --r--------r-- I I I oj I --r [1J IJr--,h r--, IL1J ~LJ I ... "' z ~ " , @ c lJt o. ., ~ 8~ ii'~ N ~ , o w c rH ., l %~ 9. ei l'i ~~o '" 1,' ii, Il. IN, 'lh'l liiiil II ~:I ._,,~-._-,,~~., ~ D oe;m'o':,)_J.'~.-s'l""'l:IJ01OMPU\MlIUlt ...... salepoSS'd ~ d>l. I ~ I ! 1 (i'li1 r:. ~ h IlH [I ! l od~i -I',. J liB III J 0120 f 'II Ii' I ao..m!o- a,. Ii I ~i 'o'1O.ll:l0d3a @ o 0[0$ @0 0E];; $ < ;r: ~ < o ~ "'0 0OJ$ '" J.l II ~:I l jll I,"~ g !.ilJ ~ ,JI~ I . !iliil i , ~ , @- ~ 0 z 0 ~ e- z 0 C < ~; .. N @--- v @- .. .. l~' ~ f f ;; z 9 ~ ~ ~ @- 0 z 0 ~ z 0 @--- , ;; ~t z .. 9 ~ ~ ~ 0 z ~ z 0 ~ ~~ .. e- M @- ; ~ ~ o z " ~ ;; z 'j e-- ~ ~ z z 9 5 0: 8 0 ~ z " 0 ~ . z 0 0 z ~ ~ ~~ Ii ., ~ ~ iiH e- m; :: ,-~,,~.._,.,,~~.. ~ D oaGDlv:J.".,.....J..~"'fOS._~OU~t _ SalelOOSSV 'l? d>l I . I ! j, ,I i~ !!~ 111ill llil ~~ Ii !:a"~~ J!l~ ll.m A.. f n!l: Id lll!lHo; i ~ i I 0-i &-i o z 1j ~ i ~ ; 0- 0- 0- e- e-- 0- l i I,' HI I!il, '1!1;1 !nil! ,I ~ =1 m ~ ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-_ G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglPC Staff Report.doc 9 PC RESOLUTION NO. 07- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0278, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT THREE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 38,501 SQUARE FEET ON 2.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DE PORTOLA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (APN 959- 050-011 ) Section 1. Procedural Findinos. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On September 18, 2006, Kal Pacific & Associates filed Planning Application No. PA06-0278, (Development Plan), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 18,2007, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0278 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findinos. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010.F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; \ The project is consistent with the General Plan and with the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-B) zoning designation because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies and standards for professional office development. The proposed office use is permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and the De Portola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-B). The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DP\Planning\Draft Reso.doc I with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including site design, lot coverage, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, and standards intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which protects the public's health, safety, and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review and the Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings and determinations in connection with the approval of PA06-0278: Class 32. Section 15332. In-fill Development Proiects A. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; The proposed land use for the site is allowed by the General Plan Professional Office land use designation and the Planned Development Overlay-8 zoning designation. The project is consistent with all development regulations, including setbacks, height, and FAR requirements for the site. B. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; The project is proposed on a 2.8 acre site surrounded by existing commercial and residential development. . C. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; The site is not identified as a potentially sensitive habitat area by the General Plan. The project site is entirely disturbed and is not known to have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. D. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; G:\Planning\2006\P A06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DP\Planning\Draft Reso.doc 2 Professional office development was anticipated for the project site and the land use was analyzed as pari of the General Plan and Planned Development Overlay. The project has been found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as pari of the General Plan EIR. E. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and' public services; The utility and public service companies were notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA06-0278, a Development Plan for the construction of three office buildings totaling 38,501 square feet located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola ProfBldg DP\Planning\Draft Reso.doc 3 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 18th day of July 2007. Dennis Chiniaeff, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of July 2007, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DP\Planning\Draft Reso.doc 4 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola ProfBldg DP\Planning\Draft Reso.doc 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA06-0278 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct three professional office buildings totaling 38,501 square feet on 2.8 acres located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel No. 959-050-011 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Expiration Date: July 18, 2007 July 18, 2009 Approval Date: WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). G:IPlanningI2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 2 Planning Department 2. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final Conditions of Approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend. the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, conceming the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three 1-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. A Sign Program shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Commission. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Roof Tile Wall Stucco Color Eagle, American Heirloom, Ladera Blend Omega #413, Morning Moon Omega #421, Brown Bag G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 3 Wood Trellis and Post Columns Corbels and Facia Wrought Iron Railings Aluminum Doors and Windows Light Fixtures Decorative Pavers Dunn Edwards DE6098, Burns Cave Pre-cast Dunn Edwards DEW338, White Heat, LRV 87 Dunn Edwards DE6364, Cavernous, LRV 8 Glass - Old Castle, Solarcool Caribia Frame- Aluminum Finish Morgan Park, 8843-94 RCP Block & Brick, Antique Red Henri Studio Cast Stone, Relic Lava The Doctor is In by Max Turner Two Kids on a Bench by Max Turner , Water Fountains Bronze Statues 10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer 01" C'ny successors in interest. 11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 13.. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. Public Works Department 14. A Grading Permit for either rough andlor precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 15. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 16. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 17. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. G:IPlanning12006IPA06-D278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 4 18. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment mechanisms. 19. The proposed access on Margarita Road shall be restricted to a right in-right out movement. Building and Safety Department 20. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2004 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 21. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 22. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 23. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 24. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 25. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. 26. Obtain street addressing for all proposed building - site plan to indicate all suite numbering in direct correlation with addressing and proposed buildings. 27. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 28. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 29. Provide van 'accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 30. Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Developments with multiple shell buildings on a site shall provide a separate meter for site lighting, landscapinglirrigation and fire alarms. This power may be, provided in a house panel within each building or an exterior pedestal on site. If there will be a single house meter in one of the shell buildings, please be advised the City of G:\Planning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DP\Planning\Draft COAs.doc 5 T emecula releases tenant improvement plans only after the house meter is released or the shell building is considered complete and final inspection has been signed off. 31. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 32. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 33. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 34. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 35. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. . 36. . A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 37. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 38. Show all building setbacks. 39. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0- 90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays Fire Prevention 40. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 41. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a looped water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, constructio'n type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A). G:IPlanning\2006IPA06_0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 6 42. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. On-site hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 43. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). Community Services Department 44. A Class II bike lane shall be included on the Street Striping Plan for Margarita Road and any damage caused to existing Class II Bike Lanes on De Portola Road during construction will need to be repaired andlor replaced to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. 45. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 46. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 47. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. I 48. All parkways, landscaping, multi use trail, fencing, and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Police Department 49. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings should be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch center (951) 696-HELP. 50. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings should be placed in a well- lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. ., 51. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. G:IPlanning12006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglOraft COAs.doc 7 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc 8 Planning Department 52. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer( s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 53. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. 54. The applicant shall comply with all the recommendations listed in the Geotechnical/Geological Engineering Report dated September 6, 2006. 55. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavationlconstruction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult andlor authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining .that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 56. A 30-day preconstruction survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist to determine if any active raptor nests occur within the limits of disturbance prior to commencement of grubbing, clearing, or grading activities. No brushing, clearing, or grading shall occur within 500 feet of occupied tree-nesting raptor habitat during the raptor breeding season (typically December to July). 57. A qualified archaeological monitor will develop a mitigation plan and a discovery clauseltreatment plan, which will include mitigation monitoring to be implemented during earthmoving on the project site. The treatment plan will allow for the recovery and subsequent treatment .of any archaeological remains and associated data uncovered by brushing, grubbing or earthmoving. 58. Prior to any clearing and grubbing and/or earth moving activities, a qualified archaeologist retained by the project proponent and approved by the City of Temecula shall review the approved development plan. The archaeologist shall conduct any pre-construction work recommended and participate in a pre-construction project meeting with development staff and construction operators to ensure an understanding of the mitigation measures required during construction. 59. Monitoring will be conducted on a full-time basis until the project archaeologist determines that resources are not likely to be encountered. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglOraft COAs.doc 9 60. If archaeological remains are encountered during any earthmoving activities, all work must stop in the area in which the find(s) are present, and the Riverside County Coroner must be notified. State law dictates that the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) must be notified in the event that remains are determined to be, in fact, human and of Native American decent. In some instances, grave remains may also include artifacts found in association with a burial. 61. If a previously unknown site is encountered and it requires additional mitigation, a plan or proposal will be submitted to the project proponent outlining the plan of action that needs to be implemented in an attempt to mitigate the new site. If this site appears to be more than 45 years old and is of historic nature, all stipulations herein should apply. 62. Any recovered archaeological resources will be identified, recorded, mapped, and artifacts catalogued as required by standard archaeological practices. Examination by an archaeological specialist will be included where necessary, dependent upon the artifacts, features or sites that are encountered. Specialists will identify, date, and/or determine significance potential. 63. A final report of findings will be prepared by the archaeoiogist for submission to the project proponent, the eastern Information Center and the City of Temecula. The report will describe parcel history, summarize field and laboratory methods used, if applicable, and include any testing or special analysis information conducted to support the findings. Public Works Department 64. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 65. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 66. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 67. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc 10 68. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 69. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Gradirlg, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. 70. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. 71. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works 72. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 73. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 74. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 75. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 76. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc l' 77. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. Fire Prevention 78. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). 79. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 80. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14). 81. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred- fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). 82. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 902.2.1). G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 12 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:IPlanning\2006\PA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc 13 Planning Department 83. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Plarm:ng Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 84. All downspouts shall be internalized. 85. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection". d. A note on the plans stating that 'The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection". e. One copy of the approved grading plan. f. Water usage dlculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to- head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. 86. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after- G:IPlannlng\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglQraft COAs.doc 14 thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 87. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 88. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 89. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Public Works Department 90. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of T emecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City ofTemecula Standard No. 207A. c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400. 401 and 402. d. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. e. Public street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 91. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Margarita Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R1W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R1W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 92. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and drive approaches. G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 15 b. Storm drain facilities. c. Sewer and domestic water systems. d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines. 93. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 94. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by Riverside Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works. 95. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 96. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 97. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Fire Prevention 98. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans directly to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an indiVidual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). 99. Prior to building permit, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902). 100. Prior to issuance of building permit fire !1prinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Please note the fire alarm control panel needs to be located in the same room as the fire sprinkler riser. There needs to be exterior access. Each building needs to have there own separate sprinkler riser room. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 16 101. Prior to issuance of building permit fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Please note the fire alarm control panel needs to be located in the same room as the fire sprinkler riser. There needs to be exterior acr.ess. Each building needs to have there own separate sprinkler riser room. Community Services Department 102. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction. Police Department 103. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. a. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building roof tops be kept at a distance so as to deter roof accessibility by 'would-be burglars." Trees also act as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a six foot clearance from the buildings. b. Landscape berms should not exceed three feet in height. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 17 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc 18 Planning Department 104. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 105. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 106. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 107. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space fin'ished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 108. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 109. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 110. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancyoranyuse allowed by this permit. Public Works Department 111. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 19 112. . As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 113. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 114. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention 115. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 116. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 901.4.4). 117. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to, and be approved by, the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 118. Prior to issuance of Certificat(l of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9). 119. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10). 120. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4). G:IPlannlng\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglDraft COAs.doc 20 121. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4). 122. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs. 123. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file fonnats may be acceptable, contact Fire Prevention for approval. Police Department 124. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building should have their own alarm system. This requirement is not required if the facility is opened 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. G:\Planning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DP\PlanninglDraft COAs.doc 21 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-Q278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlannlnglDraft COAs.doc 22 125. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 24,2006, a copy of which is attached. 126. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated September 21, 2006, a copy of which is attached. 127. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the City of Temecula Police Department transmittal dated October 17, 2006, a copy of which is attached. 128. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in Eastern Information Center's transmittal dated October 27, 2006, a copy of which is attached. 129. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's (RTA) transmittal dated October 6,2006, a copy which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above' Conditions of Approval. 'I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these Conditions of Approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Date' Applicant's Signature Applicant's Printed Name G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-02780e Portola Prof Bldg DP\planninglOraft COAs.doc 23 o COuNTY OF RIVERSIDE . HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY 0 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Dana Schuma RE: Development Plan No. PA06-0278 nS~---;-:-~~:~I~': \ \\:.;~ OCT 2 '1 2006 Gi\, LId kt-==~~':::=-'\ October 24, 2006 Dear Ms. Damko: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the development plan to construct three medical buildings totaling 37,825 square feet. Located on the southwest comer of Margarita Road and De Portola Road. The site plan indicates that water and sewer services will be provided. 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water district. b) The Department of Environmental Health is to be notified of any medical waste generation. A medical waste generator permit shall be required if generation of medical waste is part of the operation ofthe medical offices. Please contact John Watkins at 951-955-8982 S artinez, (951) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. ( , \ \ ,emen! Agency' EO. Box 1280. Rivmide, CA 92502-1280 . 1909) 955-8982 . FAX 19091 781.9653 . 4080 Lemon St,eeL 9th F10N. Riverside, CA 92501 i Water Eoclineerinl-l . Po. Box 1206. Riverside, CA 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon Street 2nd Roor, Riverside, CA 92501 @ RaDcha Water Board of Directors Ben R. Dl"3ke President Stephen J. Corona Sr. Vice President Ralph H. Daily Lisa D. Herman Joh.a E. Hoagland Michael R. MeMiUaD William E. Plummer Officers: Brian J. Brady General Manager Phillip 1... Forbes Assistant General Manager I Chief Financial Officer E. P. "Bob- Lemons Director of Engineering Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Jeff D. Armstrong ControUer Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary C. Michael Cowe<<: Be5t Best &: Krie(er LLP General Counsel September 21, 2006 Dana Schuma, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 rrvr~--.=--c---. '.'. !rV l~~ ~~ : 1006~ @! By I -'~"-- .-_1 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY DEPORTOLA PROFESSIONAL OFFICES LOT NO. 26 OF TRACT NO. 3752 APN 959-050-011; CITY PROJECT NO. PA06-0278 [KP & ASSOCIATES] Dear Ms. Schuma: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off- site water facilities and the completion of fmancial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fIre protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. This project has the potential to become a commercial condominium development, with individual building owners and an Owner's Association maintaining the common property and private water, fIre protection, and landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD requires that the City of Temecula include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to tins agreement, RCWD would require ihdividua! water meters for each condominium unit. The development should be conditioned to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Mic ael G. Meyerpeter, P.E. Acting Development Engineering Manager cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 06\MM:at287\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road . Post Office BOJ: 9017 . Temecula, California 92589-9017 . (951) 296-6900 . FAX (951) 29EH;860 n_._..___l.M.._._____ TEMECULA POLICE DEPARTMENT Crime Prevention & Plans Unit 28410 Old Town Front Street, Suite 105, Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 695-2773 Fax: (951) 506-5708 Date: October 17, 2006 Project Number: PA06-0278 Project Type: Development Plan Project Name: DePortola Professional Offices Project Description: A Development Plan application Applicant: KP & Associates Case Planner: Dana Schuma The following pertains to Officer Safety, Public Safety and Crime Prevention measures regarding this Planning project transmittal. 1. Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. a. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building roof tops be kept at a distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a six feet clearance from the buildings. b. Any berms should not exceed three feet in height. c. The placement of all landscaping should be in compliance with guidelines from Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) (See conditions item #9 below). 2. Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lignting Ordinance, California Government Code 8565. Furthermore, recommend all exterior lighting be in compliance with Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinanse 665 requiring low-pressure sodium lighting. a. Recommend all exterior'do'ors have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above each door. The doors should be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. b. All exterior night lighting should be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness and to prevent problems on the premises. c. The Governors Order to address the power crisis became effective March 18,2001. This bill calls for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non- business hours. The order, in part, states: "All California retail establishments, including but not limited to shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." d. 'Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000.00 in accordance with section 8565 of the California Government Code." 3. Hardware: Recommend all doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware is commercial or institution grade. 4. Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings should be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Report all crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch center (951) 696-HELP. 5. Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building should have their own alarm system. This requirement is not required if the facility is opened 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. 6. Roof Hatches: All roof hatches should be painted "International Orange." 7. Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings should be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" featl,;rE' to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 8. Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 9. Crime-Free Multi-Housing Program: Recommend project managercontactthe Temecula Police Department regarding pre-qualifying the units as a "Crime-free Multi-housing unit. This program involves the Police and Fire Departments. All managers must attend a mandatory training course; pass all lighting and Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) inspections dealing with landscaping. Upon completion, the complex will be granted status as being a crime-free multi-housing complex with proper signage posted at the entrance to the complex. Requalification is done on an annual basis. Furthermore, the definition of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) at the University of Louisville as "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to reduction in the fear and incidence of crime, and an improvement in the quality of life." The primary nine CPTED strategies are: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery of signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Relocation of gathering areas. Gathering areas or congregating areas need to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesignate the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play are'l, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnorm'al users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 10. Crime Prevention: a. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association 1127- 11th Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. " b. Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department. c. Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. d. Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public. e. The T emecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business-advising customers of the 'Inkless Ink program in use". If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. Any questions regarding these comments shall be referred to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (951) 695-2773. Lynn N. Fanene, Sr. , :, EASTERN INFORMATION CENTER CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL ~ESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0418 (951) 827-5745 - Fax (951) 827-5409 - eickw@ucr.edu Inyo, Mono, and Riverside Counties TO: Dana Schuma City of Temecula Planning Department October 27. 2006 RE: Cultural Resource Review Case: PA06-0278/DP/DePortola Professional Building Records at the Eastern Information Center of the California Historical Resources Information System have been reviewed to determine if this project would adversely affect prehistoric or historic cultural resources: The proposed project area has not been surveyed for cultural resources and contains or is adjacent to known cultural resource(s). A Phase I study is recommended. ~ Based upon existing data the proposed project area has the potential for containing cultural resources. A Phase I study is recommended. A Phase I cultural resource study (RI- ) identified one or more cultural resources. The project area contains, or has the possibility of containing, cultural resources. However, due to the nature of the project or prior data recovery studies, an adverse effect on cultural resources is not anticipated. Further study is not recommended. A Phase I cultural resource study (RI- recommended. ) identified no cultural resources. Further study is not There is a low probability of cultural resources. Further study is not recommended. If, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. Due to the archaeological sensitivity of the area, earthmoving during construction should be monitored by a professional archaeologist. ~ The submission of a cultural resource management report is recommended following guidelines for Archaeological Resource Management Reports prepared by the. California Office of Historic Preservation, Preservation Planning Bulletin 4(a), December 1 989. ~ Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Records search and field survey Testing [Evaluate resource significance; propose mitigation measures for "significant" sites.] Mitigation [Data recovery by excavation, preservation in place, or a combination of the two.) Monitor earthmoving activities COMMENTS: If you have any questions, please contact us. Eastern Information Center - ~ ;- Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 Riverside. CA 92517-1968 Phone: (951) 565-5000 Fax: (951) 565-5001 October 6, 2006 Dana SChuma, Project Planner Planning Department, City of T emecula PO Box 9033 Temecula CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: Case PA06-0278 "De Portola Professional Bldg" - Comments from RTA Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for PA06-Q278 for the De Portola Professional Bldgs, totaling 38,000 sq ft and located west of Margarita Rd and south of De Portola Rd in Temecula. RT A currently operates Route 24 along this portion of Margarita. Other bus routes are likely in the future to use this portion of Margarita. The SW corner is a logical site for an improved bus stop along southbound Margarita. Even though curb and gutter are already installed, some will have to be removed to construct the driveway opening, setting precedent for additional C&G removal for the bus turnout. RT A is recommending modification of the existing curb and gutter to install a standard bus stop and bus tumout to be located along Margarita as shown on the attached marked-up plans. Please contact my office if details about the turnout are needed. Typically the turnout requires a min 10ft X 50 ft. concrete bus parking pad and is about 130 ft long and 10 to 12 ft deep depending on the striping of the traffic lanes. The objective is to alloW the bus to pull completely out of traffic's way. The street cross sections indicate sufficient right of way is available. If you need any additional clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (951) 565-5164 or contact me at mmccoy@1riversidetransit.com. Thank you for your support of better bus transit in Temecula. Sincerely, ~~ Michael McCoy Senior Planner F:\Data\PlanninglMikeMIWordlDev Review\Temecula\2006\RTA Lthd - PA06-Q278.doc ATTACHMENT NO.4 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING G:IPlanning\2006IPA06-0278 De Portola Prof Bldg DPIPlanninglPC Staff Report.doc 10 Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Planning Application No. PA06-0278 Kal Pacific & Associates Southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road A Development Plan to construct three professional office buildings totaling 38,501 square feet on a 2.8 acre site. Class 32 Exemption per CEQA Section 15332 (In-fill Development Projects) Dana Schuma, Associate Planner Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: July 18, 2007 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. CEQA Action: Case Planner: G:IPlanningl2006IPA06-0278 De Porrola ProfBldg DPIPlanningINOPH.doc