HomeMy WebLinkAbout07_035 PC Resolution
PC RESOLUTION NO. 07-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA07-0048, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO TABLE
. LU-5 OF LAND USE ELEMENT TO DESIGNATE AN 84
ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
OF DENDY PARKWAY AND WINCHESTER ROAD AS A
FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (APN 909-370-018 AND
909-370-032)
Section 1. Procedural Findinas. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On February 8, 2007, The Garrett Group filed Planning Application No.
PA07-0048, (General Plan Amendment), in a manner in accord with the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. On September 5, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-0048.
C. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on September 5, 2007, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning
Application No. PA07-0048 subject to' and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinas. The Planning Commission, in recommending that
the City Council approve the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
To recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, the following findings
must be made:
A. The amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0048 Ternecul. 84 GPAIPlanninglPCIFINAL PC Reso GPA.doc
I
The proposed amendment to add a future Specific Plan area to Table LU-5 of the
Land Use Element meets the goals and policies of the General Plan, and is
consistent with the anticipated impacts of the Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the General Plan and the guidelines of the Development Code. Any
future proposals for the Specific Plan area will be subject to the City's General
Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines to ensure the public health,
safety and welfare of the community is maintained as new development occurs.
B. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses.
The proposed amendment to add a future Specific Plan area to Table LU-5 of the
Land Use Element is compatible with the existing and surrounding uses because
any future proposals for the 84 acre site will be consistent with the goals and
policies of the General Plan and the content and processing requirements
contained in the Development Code. Therefore, the proposed amendment will be
compatible with existing and future uses in the surrounding area.
C. The amendment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
The proposed amendment will not conflict with the existing zoning or designated
land uses throughout the City. The proposed amendment will result in compatible
future development, which meets the recommended land use and circulation
pattern, maximum density and intensity of development, a desired mix of uses
and other factors consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Section 3. Environmental Comoliance. The Planning Commission hereby
makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the
approval of the General Plan Amendment, (PA07-0048): .
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
General Plan Amendment as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon
the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial
evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a
Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on August 4, 2007, and expired on September 3,
2007. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at
the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92590.
C. Three written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.
G:\Planning\2007IPA07-0048 Temecul. 84 GPA\Planning\PC\FINAL PC Reso GPA.doc
2
D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration
prior to and at the date public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds
that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2)
there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the
environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
E. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared for this project.
Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-
0048, a General Plan Amendment to Table LU-5 to designate an 84 acre site as a
future Specific Plan area.
G:lPlanning\2007\PA07-0048 Temecula 84 GPAlPlanninglPCIFINAL PC Reso GPA.doc
3
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 5th day of September 2007.
ijl~
John Telesio, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
?)vb/;;./ td;;m? ~
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
~ .....-
[SEALj, :-
...........' .\.
--,
."
,
'~, . .-~'
STATE OF CALlFOI)NiA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 07-35 was duly and regularly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting th~reof held on the 5th
day of September 2007, by the following vote:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
-n~LI ~~..L _
J,wv /'71-(/ ~ JA-.
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0048 Terneculo 84 GPAIPlanninglPCIFINAL PC Reso GPA.doc
4
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 07-_
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0048 Temecula 84 GPA\PJanning\DRAFT PC Reso OPA.doc
5
RESOLUTION NO. 07-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA07-0048, A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO
TABLE LU-5 OF LAND USE ELEMENT TO DESIGNATE
AN 84-ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF DENDY PARKWAY AND WINCHESTER
ROAD AS A FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA (APN 909-
370-018 AND 909-370-032)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findinas. The City Council of the City of Temecula
finds and determines that:
A. On September 5,2007, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-0048.
B. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on September 5, 2007, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning
Application No. PA07-0048 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. On
this Resolution.
, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on
F. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
project and approved the recommended General Plan Amendment under Planning
Application No. PA07-0048 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder
and the attached Exhibit A.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinas. The City Council, in approving the General Plan
Amendment hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community;
The proposed amendment to add a future Specific Plan area to Table LU-5 of the
Land Use Element meets the goals and policies of the General Plan, and is
consistent with the anticipated impacts of the Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) for the General Plan and the guidelines of the Development Code. Any
future proposals for the Specific Plan area will be subject to the City's General
Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines to ensure the public health,
safety and welfare of the community is maintained as new development occurs.
B. The amendment is compatible with existing and surrounding uses;
The proposed amendment to add a future Specific Plan area to Table LU-5 of the
Land Use Element is compatible with the existing and su"ounding uses because
any future proposals for the 84-acre site will be consistent with the goals and
policies of the General Plan and the content and processing requirements
contained in the Development Code. Therefore, the proposed amendment will
be compatible with existing and future uses in the su"ounding area.
C. The am'endment will not have an adverse effect on the community and are
consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan;
The proposed amendment will not conflict with the existing zoning or designated
land uses throughout the City. The proposed amendment will result in compatible
future development, which will meet the recommended land use and circulation
pattern, maximum density and intensity of development, a desired mix of uses
and other factors consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan.
Section 3. Environmental Findinas. The City Council hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the
recommended approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment (the Project):
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
General Plan Amendment as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings
contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that
the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was prepared.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on August 4,2007, and expired on September 3,
2007. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at
the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California 92590.
C. Three written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.
D. The City Council reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all
comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the
, City Council meeting and based on the whole record before it finds
that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2)
there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the
environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent
judgment and analysis of the City Council.
E. Based on the findings set forth in this Resolution, the City Council adopts
the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective on
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this day of
Chuck Washington, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 07- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
G:\P!anning\2007\PA07-0048 Temecu!. 84 GPA\P!.nning\DRAFT PC Resn GPA.doc
6
en
f
~
li en
ii: ::
i;jj
~-g
c ..
Gl...J
Cl
en
Gl
>
:g
GO
:is'
Q
c
o
:;::
Q.
'I:
U
en
GO
o
c
o
~
..9
c
..
ii:
u
;;::
'u
GO
Q.
UI
f
"
-
"
LL
,5 ;:;
Gi...J
.0,
.. OJ
...JU::
"'"
00
~
Q.
~
c
'"
a:
::::i~
'u
..
Q.
en
c ..
CtI;g
a: en
o en
;;:: 0
'(3 a.
~ui'
en '"
"'w
.. ~
.= en
::l CO C
g.....:-~
~.~ a..
- ~
0-0
c~~
(J) '0 0
.. c ..
o .- c..
"'O.....:-(/)
-.~ co
(I)~-
J: .. 0
E!:.Eiii
~8 E 1;
fS: B..
"Ola.
enc'"
-:scu
~.2 '5
a.Oer
en .5 CD
o . ~
Icn=
iii 5l '3'
5 ~ ~
'us Q) :J
m="'C
~OQ)
e;... .~
a.<l:E
'C~
0::",
~a.
.$>>
(J)'C
.. C
.r::: ..
go
~-g
'"
1Il
1Il
c
'"
a:
o
""
'u
..
a.
en
..
~
"
-
"
l.L,.
1Il
1Il