HomeMy WebLinkAboutParcel Map 29309 Parcel 1 Supplemental Geotechnical Investigation
.'
Supplement Geotechnical Investigation
Ralphs Market
Margarita Road and Winchester Road
Temecula, California
Project Number 6738-97
November 18, 1997
NorCal Engineering
PM M3a1
.,~
\
NorCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
10641 HUMBOL T STREET LOS ALAMITOS, CA 90720
(562)799-9469 FAX (562)799-9459
November 18,1997
Project Number 6738-97
Cahan Properties
11440 W. Bernardo Court, Suite 300
San Die9o, California 92127
,Attn: Mr. Robert Cahan
RE: Supplement Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Ralphs Market
Development - Located at the Northeast Corner of Margarita Road and
Winchester Road, Temecula, California
,Dear Mr. Cahan:
Pursuant to your request, this firm has provided additional field boring explorations and
:provided laboratory testing for the above referenced Ralphs project. The purpose of this
linvestigation is to evaluate the current subsurface conditions at the subject site and to
provide any supplement geotechnical recommendations for development. Our
geotechnical report titled "Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation" dated August 9, 1997
was performed to provide preliminary geotechnical engineering recommendations. This
report presents the finding of our study along with supplement and revised
recommendations for the planned development.
This supplement investigation consisted of the placement of four additional borings by a
truck mounted hollow stem auger to supplement our previous boring to a maximum
depth of 50 feet placed strategically in the proposed areas of the Ralphs Market
development. The explorations were visually classified and logged by a field engineer
with locations of the subsurface explorations shown on the attached Site Plan. A
description of the subsurface conditions are listed on the excavation logs in Appendix A.
These soils are described as follows:
z.
'November 18. 1997
, Page 2
Project Number 6738-97
Fill: A surficial fill was encountered consisting predominately of a light
brown to brown, fine grained silty SAND to a depth of one to two feet
below ground surface. These soils were noted to be loose to dry.
Natural: An undisturbed alluvium soil was encountered directly beneath the
upper fill soils consisting predominately of a brown, fine grained silty
SAND were noted to be dense and damp. Deeper layers consisted
predominately of fine to coarse grained sands grading towards a
clayey silt and silty sand below 40 feet below ground surface. These
soils were noted to be medium dense to dense and damp to very
moist.
The overall engineering characteristics of the earth material were relatively uniform with
each excavation. No groundwater was encountered to the depth of our explorations and
no caving occurred.
Laboratory Tests
Relatively undisturbed samples of the subsurface soils were obtained to perform
laboratory testing and analysis for direct shear, consolidation tests, and to determine in-
place moistureldensities. These undisturbed samples consisted of one inch rings with
I inside diameter of 2.5 inches. Bulk bag samples were obtained in the upper soils for
I expansion index tests, maximum density tests and sulfate tests. All test results are
I included in Appendix B, unless noted otherwise.
A. The field moisture content (ASTM: D2216) and the dry density of the ring
samples were determined in the laboratory. This data is listed on the log
of excavations.
B. Maximum density tests (ASTM: D1557-78) were performed on typical
samples of the upper soils. Results of these tests are shown on Table I.
NorCal Engineering
.3
November 18, 1997
Page 3
Project Number 6738-97
C. Expansion index tests in accordance with the Uniform Building Code
Standard No. 29-2 were performed on remolded samples of the upper
soils to determine the expansive characteristics and to provide any
necessary recommendations for reinforcement of the slabs-on-grade
and the foundations. Results of these tests are provided on Table II
and indicate a very low expansion potential.
D. Direct shear tests (ASTM: D-3080) were performed on undisturbed and
disturbed samples on the subsurface soils. These tests were
performed to determine parameters for the calculation of the safe
bearing capacity. The tests is performed under saturated conditions at
loads of 500 Ibs.lsq.ft., 1,000 Ibs.lsq.ft., and 2,000 Ibs.lsq.ft. with
results shown on Plate A.
E. Consolidation tests (ASTM: D-2435) were performed on undisturbed
samples to determine the differential and total settlement which may be
anticipated based upon the proposed loads. Water was added to the
samples at a surcharge load near the effective overburden pressure
and the settlement curves are plotted on plates in Plate B.
; Conclusions and Recommendations
: Overall, the geotechnical conditions of the subject site are currently representative of the
: conditions described in the referenced preliminary geotechnical report and this firm
:concurs with the findings and recommendations. It is our opinion that the planned
;grading is geotechnically feasible provided that all of the recommendations presented in
:our August 19, 1997 report are implemented. By following the recommendations and
;guidelines set.forth in our report, the structures will be safe from excessive settlements
,under the anticipated design loadings and conditions. The proposed development shall
!meet all requirements of the City Building Ordinance and will not impose any adverse
effect on exiting 'adjacent structures.
NorCal Engineering
'i
November 18. 1997
Page 4
Project Number 6738-97
Limitations
The recommendations and conclusions contained in this report are based upon the soil
conditions uncovered in our test excavations. No warranty of the soil condition between
our excavations is implied. NorCal Engineering should be notified for possible further
recommendations if unexpected to unfavorable conditions are encountered during
, construction phase. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that all information
, within this report is submitted to the Architect and appropriate Engineers for the project.
'This firm should have the opportunity to review the final plans to verify that all our
I recommendations are incorporated. This report and all conclusions are subject to the
I review of the controlling authorities for the project. Our representative should be
I present during the grading operations and construction phase to certify that such
! recommendations are complied within the field.
, The geotechnical investigation has been conducted in a manner consistent with the level
: of care and skill exercised by members of our profession currently practicing under
'similar conditions in the Southern California area. No other warranty, expressed or
implied is made.
,We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to you. If you have any further
:questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Hespectfully submitted,
'NORCAL ENGINEERING
-4Jlrs--
Scott D. Spensiero
Project Manager
fJ{)i(;)~~
:Keith D. Tucker
Project Engineer
RG.E.841
NorCal Engineering
5
----
-----
~
i>
~l I
r<
""
I ~I
I -
I
c;>. I
aJ
,~.~
mtt+HtHtH+O
n.llllllJlWillIl
r;t rnmmmmv
i~
~
/
~
I
I
I
,
~l
,I
/1
,~
" . /
~~"" /
'':::---. ',- <
..... ~ /
~ o~
..... -, ~"'-
,,,,,,"Ii;>
'j,. .~ I
;;--.::.......... .
-.:::,....... ---- '
......._. - I
,........... ----
._-~~~ -- - ---i_
.
.
\
\ ;.;;+11
,
,
I ....
, ..dL I
, '-"'_ aJ
L__
-
---<
'"
z
o
;::
~
o
-'
Q.
X
Z~
<cui
..Jii:
a.~
W~
t-!o:
-u
cno
-'
w
....
<(
::;;
~
a:
Q.
Q.
<(
I
,
I
,
I
j
.~~
,f = ~ r-
.r: 5 ~
. ~ ~ >
~ 8 ~ ~
._....l ~
~6 a: ~
= z ~!
r~":r: en
.~ U :r
~ ~
,_0 <I:
~~a:
Uo S;
o .;
'I-cZ :2
0< '"
Zg
""
.....
:::
~
...
Z
:5
..
:0;.
OU
o:Z
..-
00:
~:i:
..'"
-0:
Ow
~~
zo:
:5~
......
w
o
"
Z
(p
Project Number 6738-97
APPENDICES
(In order of appearance)
Appendix A - Logs of Recent Excavations
Logs of 80rings 81 to 85
Appendix 8 - Laboratory Analysis
Table I - Maximum Density Tests
Table II - Expansion Tests
Table III - Sulfate Tests
Plate A - Direct Shear
Plate 8 - Consolidation Tests
NorCal Engineering
1
NorCal Engineering
Project Number 6738-97
~
--
MAJOR OIVlSIONS
5i'M8Qt..S
TYPICAL NAMES
o'<;:l'
.0.(1, GW
O,Q,
".;;.,7
1fI'!:'1. ,....J:~; $A..JV!'t..f. ~~..W!" -SAlvO IIIZr""o.
'/~.":.E OJ .'It" ':NtS '
CLEAN
GRAVELS
(UTTU Olf ~GP
NO 'INl'S I ~
/lOCA'f qA"'~C~ '''A'''~'' OA 6JfA"'C~ "SAND
.IItZTt/#ES I Llrrl.-E OR NO FINES.
GRAVELS
(MOlfE THAN 10"
0' couse '"AC.
rlON 1$ 'AA.LA
T)UH ritE NtH
SICVC SIU I
GRAVELS GM
WITH FINES' fi,:
(A......ECIAIU ,I." ~6 GC
0' "NeSI ~
Sltrr '/I..wr!..s, GRAYE!.-SANC-SIl.r JlIXTU~C$.
COARSE
GRAINEO
SOILS
c,-.,,'(r G/t.AYE:'S, ~YE'''-$,ANO-C:'J't M~.
WE~1. fJ/lAOED SANDS, t;.;t..wn,r SANDS,
LlTTU 0" HO ,mEs.
.'.'.SW
(MORE THAN 10"
0' MATE""'L 1$
LA"~EIf THAN ZOO
SIEYE $fZO
CLEAN
SANOS
.
"/JIJIILJ' MAOCD SANDS OR UAVELLT SANOS,
LITTU 0.. HO I'1Nn.
SP
SANOS
(MtMI THAN SO"
0' COMIE _-
TlON II SlUUD
THAN THE NO.4
SIEVE IIZEI
.
SANDS , : SM
WITH FINES w
(A....IfECIA6LE AIIr. ~ SC
0' I'1NESI 0/ .'- '
IILTY SANDS, SAND - SI" IIl1rTl1ReS.
CLA'fCT $ANDS, S,J,ND - CLAY MIXTcmeS.
lNOlrlSANlC SitTS' AND YEIfY nNE $AJl(JI, IfDCI(
ML "oil", Sll.TY Olf CLAYEY 'IHE SANDS DIf
CLA'fFY IU$ WITH IL"HT 1'L.UT'tr:/T'Y.
SILTS ANO CLAYS
~CL
lNOIf'ANIt: CLAn D' LDW TD MEDIUM
!'USTlCfTY, OAVEt4l' "AYI, IANDY CLAn,
IILTY CLAYS, LEAN CL.lYI.
(L/OQID UMIT LEIS THAN SOl
FINE
GRAINED
SOILS
(MDIfI TNAIt SO"
I D' IIATEIfIAL II
I $,/fALLE" THAN
IIDD SICYE SIze
OL
D116AJflC SILT I AND D116AJf1C SUY CUYS
III
INDIf,NfIt: StLTS,M/CACEDlIS DIf DU.7TJItIACCWt
'IHe SANDY Olf $ZJ'Y sou, ELAITIC SitTS.
MH
SILTS ANO CLAYS
~CH
~OH
---
~PI
~
INOltfAHIC CI..AYS 0' HI$H 'USTICtrT,FJ.TCl...ATS
(UCUID "lifT MeffE TJt.AN SC/
(J"~.JNfC C:'A~S ~, M~'J(J'" ~a ;lfGI'!
,:..U:'fC::-'Y. CRj,J,,yfC $f":1.
HIGHLY ORGANiC SOILS
'!Af .J.ItItJ crHElI Jtf~HI.Y (Jl!j.lHfC SC/L3
4OUN~.c~Y CL.J.SSIF'CATION$. $0"1 'DSS~SSJII' CHA.t..crE.":s~;CS 0' r....o '.tefl'S A"E DCS/~YJrEa 11'
COllI/lIAr/tiNS D' (lltC'" Sni!;:..!
N orCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTEOiNICAL CONSULTANTS
l.UFIED SOIL CUSSIFICATIlJI SYSW.
'\
NlWrr:r
IM1I
,
,. aw~ ~
w ~
~ - Ul ~~:t ~ ~ -
ili.;: g!;;~ w ~~
~, ~~
'" - ou ~
~ ,. '= 'j!<lI~ "
a: :f~_ ;;Ii
0
5.4
3/11; 5 S 5-
3.4
-
8/7/9 S 10-
.
-
8/8/8 S 15-
.
.
3.6
6.2 7/8/1 S 20-
.
:
I
I
I 4.0 3/13/ 3 S 25-
.
,4.0
3/14; 5 S 30-
35
,SAIlI!LE TYPES
[fJ1 Rock Core
, [~]l Standard Sp1 it Spoon
[~]i Ring Sallple
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
nus SU....."Ry AP"-IU ONLY AT 'HE lOCArlON Of 'HI' saRINO AND AT THE TIMe Of
OAllLINQ. SUI'U"'ACl! CONOITIONS WAY Oll~.'EA AT OTHER LOCArtQNS AHD WAY CHANGE
AT THIS l.OCATION WITH THE PASSAQI! OF T'uE. THE DATA PRESENTeD IS ... SI"Pll~ICAnON
OF ACTUAL GOHOlnON! ENCOUN1"EAED.
L
~~
~~
"' -
w
o
\
m Bulk Sample
QJ Jar Salllp1e
Fill Soils
SAND. fin'1 grai:1ed. silty, light brown.
loose and dry
Natural Soils
SAND. fine grainP-Cl. silty. light brown.
dense and damp
SAND, fine to coarse grained, grey dense.
to very dense. damp with silty sand
interbeds
DATE DRILLED: 5123/97
EQUIPMENT USED: Simco 2800HS
GROUND"" TER LEVEL: N0ne Encountered
NorCal Engineering
SOlLS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
PRWEX:T
I DATE
LOG OF BORING #1
\0
i i~~
>- ~ DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
, w '" L
~;; 01 '" U
~ ~. i "''''
g- >- - U! 'HIS SU....A..y """-tll ONU AT 'HI! \.OCATlaN 0' fHIS lOftiNG .u.o AT THE TIME 0' ~~
~ ~ ~ILL.INO. sua'U"'ACI CONDITIONS lItAy DI"t11 AT aTM'" LOCAflOHS AHQ MAY CHANGE ;;j-
AT THIS LOCATION WITH THe ItAS$Aal 0' rUtl!. THE OATA PAl!SI!NTEO IS Ii. S'W'UJI'ICAT1ON
0' ACTUAl, CONOlnOHS EHCOUHTlAI!D.
131 35
3.2 13/14 Natural Soils
SAND. fine to coarse grained, grey. dense,
'v to very dense. damp to rroist
Clayey SILT. dark brown. stiff, very rroist
23.3 3/&,,1 R 40-
SAND. fine to coarse grained, gravelly,
23.2 20/23, ~51 45- grey. dense to very dense, wet
---- SAND, fine grained. silty. brown . dense.
. velY rroist
-
16.0 EV11/ 5R 50
END OF OORING AT 50'
,
.
55-
.
-
60-
.
-.
- .
.65-
.
-
70
! SAMPLE TYPES DATE DRILLED: 5/23/97
!IJ Rock Core [!] Bulk SaIople EQUIPIIENT USED: Sim= 2800HS
~ Standard Split Spoon QJ Jar SaMple GROUNDWATER LEVEL: None Encountered
00 Ring Salllple
.. . , .,~ .
:NorCal ~ngineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS LOG OF BORING #1 continued
\\
PROJECT I DATE
,. 03...>= ~
... ~ >=\13
L .. ~ :r: -
Q~ ~<'" w ~~
~~ Ib::f
~- .Q 0 ~r;;~ ~
,. ~ ~..~ Q~
" :!i :e~_ ~
6.0 115.2 12/1 R/
6.7
112.9 11/11 R
.
5.4 111.7 11/.1 R 10-
.
-
5.7 116.0 10/9 R 15-
-
7.9 114.2 9/16 R 20
25-
.
30-
35
SAMPLE TYPES
, [f]1 Rock Core
~:Standard Split Spoon
[!jIRlng Salllple
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
L
i=~
~~
.,-
w
THIS SUWUARY "'PliES ONLY AT THllOCATION OF nus SCAINO .\NO ...T THE TIME OF
DRILl.ING, SUlSu"'"Ce: COHOmQN! WAY DIF'ER Ar OTHER LOCAflOHS "'NO ",,1' CHAHGE
AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE ~ASSAQE OF nME. THE OArA PRESENTee 1$ " SIIolPU~IC4t10N
OF ACTUAl. CONDITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
o
.
1\
5-
-~
rn Bulk Salllple
m Jar Sa"",le
Fill Soils
SAND, fine grai~od. silty, brown, loose.
dry with small pieces of concrete pipe
Natural Soils
SAND, fine grained, silty brown, dense.
slightly damp
SAND, fine to coarse grained. greyish
brown, dense. to very dense, damp
DATE DRILLED: 11/14/97
EQUIPMENT USED: Simco 2800HS
GROUNDWATER LEYEL:None EncOlmtered
N orCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
~
I DATE
LOG OF BORING #2
\1--
>- ;5w'" ~ DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
w .... "'~~ ,L
~ - '" .... ~ -
(5.;: gt;~ w ........ t=:u
...... ~~
;g- oo ~ ~~
>- '!, 'l!"'~ '" THI$ SU....ARy ,uoI'lII!S ONLY AT rHe LOCATION 0': 1HIS 8CAING "",,0 ..., twe f'UE OF
'" l5 ~~- :! DAIU.ING. SUlSu"'...C( CONDITIONS IIIAY DIF'ER AT OTHEA l.OCAflONS "NO MAY CHANGe ,r
AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE PASSAGe 0' rlUE. THE DATA PRESENTED IS... 'IUPlI.'"ICAflON
OF ACTUAL COHOITIONS ENCOUNTERED.
0
Fill Soils
"'" SAND. fine grained. silty, brown . loose.
dry with small pieces of concrete pipe
Natural Soils
5.2 113.9 10/1~ R 5- SAND, fine grained, silty, brown, dense,
slightly damp
SAND, fine to coarse grained. greyish-
brown. dense ':0 very dense, damp
5.8 113.6 10/1 R 10-
-
.
6.7 112.29/12 R 15-
-
6.1 116.0 12/1 R 20
25-
30-
35
,SAMPLE TYPES
@} Rock Core
[]} Standard Spl it Spoon
01 Ring Sallple
ill Bulk Salllple
QJ Jar Salllple
DATE DRILLED: 11/14/97
EQUIPMENT USED: Simco 2800HS
GRDUNDIlATER LEVEL: None EncOlmtered
N orCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
LOG OF BORING #3
PROJEx:.'r
I DATE
\~
(
~ .5",'" ~
'" ~ -~Q
'L ill ~ '" ~ ~ -
15 ;: ~ '" ~~
~~ ~l;;~ '" Ib::!
0- au ~
~ ~ ~~~ a~
,. i3 ;;!
0
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
L
~t;j
~~
~ -
'"
THIS su........"., """-llES ON\.Y "'T TH! &.OCAnOH OF THIS BOAING AND At THE nMe OF
DRILL/NO. SUISUfl'...CC CONOlnON! MAY Dl"EA ...T OTHER lOCAflON9 A.NO lolAV' CHANGE
AT THIS LOCATION WITH THE ""'SAQ! OF TIUE. THE OAU. PRESENTED IS ... S....Pll~ICArION
OF ACTUAl., CONDITIONS ENCOUNT!AEO.
-~
Fill Soils
SAND. fine grained, silty, brown, loose.
drv with small nieces of concrete niOf'!
Natural Soils
SAND, fine grained, silty, brown. dense.
slightly damp
7.2
115.2 9/1
R
5-
""
10-
SAND, fine to coarse grained, greyish-
brown, dense to very dense, damp
8.3 118.7 12/1 R 15-
-
20
25-
.
30-
. 35
SAMPLE TYPES
[f] I Rock Core
~iStandard Split Spoon
[KlIRlng Salllple
[!] Bulk Saqlle
o Jar Sa..,le
DATE DRILLED: 11/14/97
EQUIPMENT USED: Simco 2800HS
&ROUNDIlATER LEVEL: Not Encountered
NorCal Engineering,
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
LOG OF BORING#4
\~
~
I DATE
,
>- 5",0:: ~
w .... o::'i3
L <11 .... J:-
ai,;: .::!-c'!: w ........
....# ou ........~ ~ ~~
"' - ~;Jl
g >- ~
l5 ~~- ~
0
8.9
115.9 9/13 R
6.0 111.9 10/1 R
-
-
5.4 116.2 13/2 R 15-
25 -
-
30-
35
,SAMPLE TYPES
IIJI Rock Core
~!Standard Split Spoon
[~JiRln9 Sallple
DESCRIPTION OF SUBSURFACE MATERIALS
L
"....
~~
~ -
w
THIS SUMMARY ""PllIS ONLY AT THE lOCATION OF THIS lOAING .\HO Ar THE TII'IE OF
OAllLlNQ. SUISUA'"C( CONDITIONS MAY DIFFER AT OTHER LOCAflONS ANO ........ CHANGE
4T THIS. lOCATION W1TH THE pA.SSAGe OF TIt"IE. THE QATA. PRESENTED IS A ,lWPt,.ielCATION
OF ACTUAL CQNOlnQHS fNCOUNrEAEO.
'\
.
10-
.
20
.
.
-
m Bulk Sallple
ill Jar Salllple
Fill Soils
SAND. fine grained. silty. brown. loose.
dry with small pieces of concrete pipe
Natural Soils
SAND. fine grained. silty, brown. dense.
slightly clamp
SAND, fine to coarse grained. greyish-brown,
dense to very dense. clamp
DATE DRILLED: 11/14/97
EQUIPMENT USED: Simco 2800HS
GROUHDIIA TER LEVEL: Not Encountered
N orCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
PROJro:'
I DATE
LOG OF BORING #5
6'
APPENDIX B
Noreal Engineering
(
Project Number 6738-97
\Cp
November 18, 1997
Page 5
Sample
B2@2'
Sample
82@2'
Sample
B2@:2'
TABLE I
MAXIMUM DENSITY TESTS
(ASTM: D-1557-781
(
Project Number 6738-97
Classification
Optimum Maximum Dry
Moisture Density (Ibs lcu.ft.)
SAND, fine grained
silty
10.0 124.0
TABLE II
EXPANSION INDEX TESTS
(U.B.C. STD. 29-2)
Classification
SAND, fine grained
silty
TABLE III
SULFATE TESTS
NorCal Engineering
Expansion
l.n.QID(
05
Concentration (opm)
55
\\
2000
i:' 1500
V>
...
~
V>
V>
ll;!
....
V>
; 1000
,SOO
2500
, ,
.. --y-
I, .
~:__'_._M.
, ; i
~./~~/~ ~
7~-~-. M__
'-'.'- '.-H-
. "
! ~ I
.
, ,
.. _.__... _ _.. _'M" _ M _ ..___ ___.__n _ . '0 .
, I I
: -t-;
, ,
I! I
,
~-
, H--
;. ";
-~..__. -....... -
, '
I I ., .
- ~--- -........
I . j'. I l,
.'-
; I
o
j; i
o
500
1000 lS00 2000
NO~L STRESS (PSF)
2500
SYMBOL
BORING
N~ER
DEPTH ~
(FEET) (DEGREES
C DRY MOISTURE
OENSITY COIITENT
(PSF) (PCF) (I)
175 115.2 8.0
100 115.9 8.9
x
o
/)"
o
2
5
2
2.5
33
37
NOTE: TESTS PERFORMED ON SATURATEO SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW.
(FM) FIELO MOISTURE
TESTS PERFORMEO ON UNDISTURBED SAMPLES UNLESS SHOWN BELOW.
(R) SAMPLES REMOLDED AT 90% OF MAXIMUM ORY DENSITY
N arCal Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANTS
PROJECT
DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS
OATE
, ;
. I
,
- I
3000
\<0
.
o
I, " I I
NOTE: IIA TER ADOED AT NORMAL
PRESSURE AT 1.0 KSF
-~
--..............
".~ ~
....., ............
, " '~
, ~ '",
,
, . ~. I,
; -: I
, ".
I "-..
"-
! (
; ......
,
;
0.5
1.0
5
10
20
40
-2
2
~
..
-
!
:;:; 4
II>
l::!
~
u
6
8
10
0.1
NORMAL PRESSURE I KSF)
SYIIlOI. BORING DEPTH
IlIJIlER I FEET)
DRY
DENSITY
IPCF)
MOISTURE
COIlTEIlT
IS)
LIQUID
LIMIT
IS)
PLASTICITY
INDEX
IS)
I ~ I : 1'~ I ::~:~ Ii:; I I I
C(lllRESSIOIl (FIl) FIELD MOISTURE - 110 IlATER ADDED
--- REBOUIlD IR) SAIlPlE REIIlUlED AT 90S OF MAXI"" DRY DENSITY
,NorCal :Engineering
SOILS AND GEOTECHNICAL CONS UL T ANTS
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
\'\
pROJECT
DATE