HomeMy WebLinkAboutTract Map 9833 Lot 8 Field Density Testing
/j} f,J -/ t) 1 tJ-t
Eall'.ch
~ . c' _ L~ ~
.... ... .cf ~echnics
<
REP-ORTOFOBSERVAnON AND RELD DENSITY TESnNG
ROUGH AND RNE GRADING
. SINGIJ.EFAMIL Y PAD
lOl";Iff;'ERACT 9833
JEDEDIAI;t SMITH ROAD,
ITEMECULA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CAUFORNIA
PROJECT NO. 98133-{)1
MAY 2,1998
'0"
iii'::;;.
Prepared For:
Mr. Gary Ingram
31275 Pescado Drive
Temecula,Califomia 92592
\
Earlh'iiff'l\(Cst~;p,QItBQX.891989, Temecula, California 92589 (909) 699,5451 . ~
"~:~:.::-::~'--::. 0" _~:'_'~"'~;"'~; _, _. _._ _ ,_",_',' _ ,',o.c:..-2-~-~:-:..::::'7:"-~~-~:;'~~}-!:.~,-,::--~:-?"..:i~~~~#':'-;'''-~.'''_:,_~~ '_.':C/?:;,,;_~
p-:,_
~
'May 2, 1998 Project No. 98133-01
'Mr. Gary Ingram
:31275 Pescado Drive
:Temecula, California 92592
iSUBJECT: REPORT OF OBSERVATION AND FIELD DENSITY TESTING
ROUGH. AND FINE GRADING
Residential Pad, Lot 8, Tract 9833, A.P.N 950-040-007
Jedediah smith Road
Temecula, California
.Gentlemen:
INTRODUCTION
IThis report presents the results of our observation and testing
:performed during construction and grading for the residential
:pad, and access driveway during rough and fine grading of the
!subject lot.
'The pad was constructed on the south side of Jedediah smith Road
Ian improved paved road in the city of Temecula. The results of
our Field Density Tests obtained during grading are tabulated in
:Table I, Results of Compaction Tests. The approximate locations
of the tests are shown on the Plot Plan, Plate 1. The 3D-scale
,Rough Grading Plans were prepared by Inland Valley Development
.Consultants, Wildomar, undated, and were used to plot our data
land guide the grading, along with field staking.
'Pro;ect DescriDtion
.The proposed development consisted of constructing a residental
:pad, and long access driveway with a culvert and wet crossing. In
,general, the pad required cuts up to 12 feet on the south and
'fills to 8 feet on the north-northwest. Cut and fill slopes were
'constructed at finished inclinations of 2:1 (horizontal to
,vertical) or flatter. The pad was graded in transition from cut
to fill, so overexcavation was required. The cut slopes consist
of dense hard sedimentary bedrock or massive colluvium that had
no adversely oriented bedding to develop stability problems, and
,are stable as constructed. The fill slopes are stable as
.constructed, based on high strength values.
o
.
SCALE
INDEX MAP
2000
N
4000
.
feel
INDEX MAP
OF
LOT 8, TRACT 9833, JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
~OUROE: U.S.G.S. 7~ MIN. QUAD. PECHANGUA 1968 (PR1988)
1..-
98133-01
Ipage 3
IPurDose of Gradinq
The purpose of the grading was to prepare the site for the
.proposed construction of the one and two-story single family
'residence, and driveway access.
GRADING PROCEDURES
;Gradinq Procedures
:The site was stripped of the heavy grasses in the areas to
receive fill and the pad area, and removed to non-structural
'areas of the lot. The areas to receive fill were then
'overexcavated 3 1/2 - 7 feet or until the dense underlying
'sedimentary bedrock was encountered. A fill key was installed as
!shown on Plate 1. The fill materials were brought to near optimum
.moisture utilizing a 1.5 inch fire hose when necessary, and
:compacted with a large Caterpillar D8K bulldozer.
IThe grading contractor was Jim Conner, Temecula.
TESTING
!Field Densitv Testinq
Field density testing was performed in accordance with ASTM
:D1556-64 (Sand Cone Method). The elevations and the results of
.the field density tests are presented in Table I of this report.
iThe approximate location of the tests are shown on the Grading
:Plan, Plate 1.
'Maximum Densitv Determinations
'Maximum density/optimum moisture determinations were made from
.representative samples of on-site soils used in the fill
:operations. The tests were performed in accordance with ASTM D
,1557 which consist of compacting 5 equal layers of soil in a 1/30
cubic foot volume mold with 25 blows of a 10 pound hammer falling
.18 inches. The results of the Maximum density/optimum
:determination are presented herein as Table II, Laboratory Test
:Resul ts .
~
, 98133-01
Page 4
iExDansion Testinq
,A finished grade sample was obtained and tested for expansion
!utilizing the U.B.C. 29-2 method. The test yielded an expansion
.index (E.I.) of 38 which is considered moderately expansive. The
: foundation .should be designed in accordance with the attached
'''Foundation and Slab Recommendations" parameters for medium
,expansion soils (Plate 2).
SUMMARY
.Our description of grading and backfill operations, as well as
.observations and testing services, were limited to those grading
:operations performed between March 27 and April 20, 1998. The
:conclusions and recommendations contained herein have been based
.upon our observation and testing as noted. It is our opinion,
Ithat the work preformed in the areas denoted has generally been
'accomplished in accordance with U.B.C., as amended by Ordinance
No. 457 specifications, and the requirements of the regulating
:agencies and is accetable for its intended purpose.
No conclusions or warranties are made for areas not tested or
: observed. This report should be considered subject to review by
Ithe controlling authorities.
This opportunity to be of service is sincerely appreciated. If
:you have any questions, please call.
t\
:98133-01
ipage 5
2-28-00
;Larry J. F
IR.C.E. 291
I Registrati
9
,WLS/LJF:ss
,Attachments:
Index Map - Page 2
Plate 1 (3D-scale) - Grading Plan
Plate 2 - Foundation and Slab Recommendations
Table I - Results of Compaction Tests
Table II - Summary of Maximum Density Testing
-::
".
"
. . ....
...:.----- .'
- . . ..... ...--
- - . ----. . ..- - ",.' .,
-' .
___::-:~.~.,/.::".~i.~' _ ~~~
"~' or, ..;...;: P"D"'f1I'-
.' '.~ >~ ... " \ b
_..V),,;.:,.. - .
.-:-- - i --7~ ~'--:- "';'--
--- ( "/~"" . ~ .'
o ___--'~. . /). ,.
. :z:' /'I'" - "1
. > .' ;. i_ ...;~.f~''- - '- - ."
r'" . --
c '\ ,r..... .
_ III ',r , . . \ .
-'"""l-- . .
o ,...--.-- ---....
c " .
- /
) 1 .
-
1
/
'-'ED '
" EDJftH
" ';\
.
-
-
0
" .j >
ROAD 0
-
-
SMliH
/
~,~
~J CrJ
/. .
\ .
\ :
.\'
"
'\
R =
2068.75'
.I
.
\ .
I':XIST .:':
. ~ .^.~. CIJ teu ~
.. .
.... ~ .- . "-'
,
".
=~.,I,
'.
,;.-:;.----
.--.'"
-
...0...=
--
R
60
.2.4"
.
~"1 J~_.....'5'
"L'=
--
-.
/
/"
..
-
'.....
:.,.......
-........-..."..
'.
',.
~.. ~
...,..... --------:
: .--/ '.
/---
.c~~
-
...
~.~~
-
-
-
....
,...
. / - ........-
/~; ::~~~.
I ~ .@~i..I.1!J l!I
'(" z ~ .~. \
CrJ :;! z
.' '" -l Gl
o rn ~
-l .....
<li ~
,/ ,;
./ ~)
..... r
.~.
""
Gl '"
tTl ;l>
o ;;
5 ;l>
Gl'''1
..... 0
~'~
o -l
~ ::;
f.; Z
-l
n
'0
.,...
.,...
c:
.<
.......
..
...
,
I
/
/
/'
,/ '
e,/\' ,
," . ,I'~!r.' , ';
C} ! ,Q . .
. tl
. .' .q ~
..' <
'" ,. tl
" III
. ~ ~
~
@
:-
~
"
~
Z
~I
01
Z
/'
I
I
/
./ -
I
I .
I.
. /'
I
/
-,
/
I
~,
'"
",. -.-."- -:--:-"
. ,.
"
/
. ./
/.
, ". ,
,.'"
/'
.' .'
",'"
~v~
",1J
/ (0
.
W
..- - - --- '- .-."
---
..-
V
\
^1I
. . _ _ ...,..V '/.:. j ,
_ . ;o...--/i-' - ..:atV"....."./ .' . . /;~.,' \
_ _ :: ::: ,_~- :" 0 . 1
_ . _ ,..... t';;;\
. _ _ __ _~~_-""':-'-''I'I':r'll . /, ~.~
.' ) lh, :.~~. . G \ ~
0., ,,,' . -
'"
",,'
",
",
./
I'
/
./
",
)
.
---- ....., ------ ..-." , .
, _-01-
- .
,-
- -.".:.. - -
.--
---
-'-
---
---'- -
-- .' ~'.1.-
~l'-'
--'-- ---
....
.--
---.
- ,-. -. -
.--
,.....'
--~
......--
,._0""--
....
..-- .-,-
--,',- - ',-- --..
-'-
-
,.
'"
.-
--
....;.
-~-
--.-....
~
- ~--
b
-
_.~-':" ,; .".-
';,- '"
- IILO
,,'
>c_
"'
-
,,:::;.
~
. ...
-
,
--.
--
.
I (J).
I (b .
I .
I CI
I .:
1 :
/<
I",
))
y
-tb
.
......... ..
...
-
Z
II. "
.... ,111..-
~O"/: ..
/. ,/
N
~
.
~
o
.
~I/I\\()
/'< .
'. .
1\'lJl
,
.-
'\" '1'
. --
. .
I ' i
.\ '
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR EXPANSIVE SOILS
(ONE AND. TWO-STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS)
1.ITOftV fCOltHO'
EXPANSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX EXPAMSION INDEX EXPANSION INDEX
0-20 21 - 50 51 - 80 '1 - 130
VERY LOW EXPANSION LOW EXPANSION MEDIUM EXPANSION HIGH EXPANSION
ALL fOOTINGI 11 INCHES ALL FOOTlNOI 11 IHeMEI EXTERIOR FOOTINOI " EXTEftlOA FOOTINOI '4 IMeME'
DEE', POOTlNGI DEE', FOOTING' INCHES DEEII. INTERIOR DEE', INTERIOR FOOTINGS 11
CONTINUOUS. NO ITlEL CONTINUOUS. 1-NO." IAIII 'OOTINOI ,. INCHES DEEII. INCHEI DEEII. 1-NO. I IAft TO'
ftEQUIAED fOR EXPANSION TOP AND lOTTO". 1-NO. .. BA" TOP AND AND BOTTOM.
.' "IORen. IOTTOM.
ALL POOTINOS ,. INCHES ALL FOOTlNOI " INCHU ALL 'DOTING, 11 INCHES EXTEft'OR FOOTING' 24 IHeHEI
DEE'. fOOTINOI DEEII.FOOTlNGI DEE', FOOTINOI DEE'. INTERIOR FOOTINOI tI
CONTINUOUS. NO lTEEL CONTINUOUI. 1-NO." IA" CONTINUOUII. 1-NO. .. 1"" INCHES DEEP. ,""NO. II .AR TOP
REQUIRED FDft EXPANSION TOP AND lOTTO". TOP AND lOTTO... AND BOTTOM.
FORCEI.
NOT REOUtfIID. 12 1f.c:HEI DEEP. 'l-NO. 4 IAft l' INCHlI DEEI'. 1-NO. 4 .Aft 24 INCHES DEEI'. 1-NO. II 'Aft
Tall AND 10TTO~. Tall AND 10TTOM. Tal' AND 10TTOM.
1-'TOftY FOOTINGS
GARAGE DOOR GftADE
ilEA..
LIYIHQ AREA FLOOft lUll . 1/2 INCHEI THICK. NO MESH a 1/1 INCHE. THtCK. a 1/1 INCHEI THICK. 4 INCHEI THICK. . X I-II'
.REQl.IRED FOf! EXPANSION I X '-10/10 WIRE MElH AT . X 1-10/10 WlftE MESH AT WIRE MESH AT MID-HEfGHT.
FORCEI. NO .BASE REQWRED. MID-HEIGHT. -I INCHEI MIo-HEIOHT. 4 INCHES . NO. I DOWELU FROM FOOTING
. MIL YISOUEEN MOISTURE GRAVEL OR lAND IAIE. . GRAVEL OR lAND IAII!' . TO lLAe AT a. INCHES DN
IAARIE" I'LU.I 1 INCH lAND. MIL VII QUEEN MOIITUftE MIL VIIQUEEN MDIITURI CENTER. 4 INCHEI GAAVEL Oft
IAft"IER l'LUI 1 INCH lAND. IAAAIEA PLUS 1 INCH lAND. lAND IAIE. CI MIL VI.QUEEN
MOIIITURE BAAAIEfII IILUI 1
INCH lAND.
GARAOE FLOOR ILAle '1/2 INCHEI THICK. NO ME'H . 1/1 INCHEI THtcK. a tit INCHES THICK. 4 IHCHEI THICK. . X '-I"
MOUIRED FOR nllANIION . x '-10/10 WIRE MEIH 0" I X 1-10/10 WIRE MESH Oft WIRE MElH OR QUARTEft
FORCES. NO IAlE REQUIRED. QUAATEfII IUIS. l'OLATe: QUARTER aus.. ISOLATE lUll. IIOLATE FROM snM
NO MOISTURE 'ARRIEft FROM aTEM WALL FOOTlNGI. FROM aTEM WALL FOOTINGS. WALL FOOTINOS. 4 INCHES
REQUIRED. 2 INCHES "OCK, GRAYEL OR '4 INCHES ROCK. GRAVEL OR ROCK. (lRAVEL OR lAND IAIE.
lAND lASE. NO MOIITURE lAND IAlE, NO MOISTURE NO MOISTURE IARRlEft
IARRIER REQUIRED. IARRIER REQUIRED. REQUIRED.
"RE-SOAKING OF LIVING NOT REQUJRED. MOllTEN 10AK TO 12 INCHES DEPTH 10AK TO 1S INCHES DEHH 10AK TO 24 INCHEI DEPTH TO
AltEA AND GARAOI! ILAI PRIOR TO POURING TO 4" AIOVI! OPTIMUM TO'S AIOYE OPTIMUM ,I, AIOVE OPTIMUM MOISTURE
IOtLt CONCRETE. MOISTURE CONTENT. MOISTURE CONTENT. CONTENT.
NOTIES: 1) ALL OEIITHI,ARE RELATlVE'TO ILAB aUBORADE.
21 IIPECIAL DEI10N .. AEOUIRED FOR VERY HIOHLY EXPANSIVE lOlLS.
FOUNDATION AND SLAB DETAIL
(NOT TO SCALE)
DOWEL (WHEN REQUIRED)
V'SQUEEN
GRAVEL OR lAND BAlE (WHEN MQUIRED)
DE"TH OF
INTERIOR
FOOTING
lOlL ~
1 INTE"'O" rOOTING
--------------
""'\
JOB NO.:
FOUNDATION AND SLAB RECOMMENDATIONS
'}8IU-OI DATE: 5/98 FIGUR~t1'ti: 2
EARTH TECHNICS
TABLE I ,
RESULTS OF OOMPACTION TESTS
JOB' No..: gill :>:>-01 NAME: nJr.:OAM DATE; r:/2/9g
Mo.lSTURE UNIT DRY RELATIVE SOIL
TEST NO.. DATE DEPTH CONTENT DENSITY Co.MP(~CTlo.N TYPE
('lr.) (PCF> 'lr.)
1 3/27/98 1110 16.3 118.3 91.6 A Key 1st lift
2 " 1112:, 17.1 117.1 90.6 " Fill key/slope
3 4/9/98 1114 10.2 119.8 90.5 B Fill slope
4 4/10 1113 9.1 120.8 93.5 A A11uv. remove 1st Ii t
,
5, 4/13 1116 8.2 122.4 92.4 B Pild fill
,6 " 1115, 9.5 118.1 91.4 A, Alluv. remove 1st
'7 4/14 1117 11.1 123.9 93.5 B' Pad fill
:8 4/15 1118 10.4 122.4 92.4 " overex pad
'9 4/16 1119 9.3 120.1 '90.7 " Overex pad
10 4/17 1119 8.7 ' , 120.8 91.2 " Over/finish pad
11 " 1115 7.9, 119.6 90.3 " Slope test finish
, ,
12 4/20 1107 12.2 ' 119.7 90.4 " Drive over
13 " 1102, 9.1 120.3 90.8 " , Drive cross fill
.
14 " 1104 9.7 121. 3 90.4 ,', 1M " "
.
1O
.
SEE PLAN Fo.R TEST Lo.CATlo.NS , ,
:: ~Senil Cone A8TM 01558-84 ~-Drlve CyRnder A8TM 02937-71 !!-Nuclear A8TM 3017-78
" **UST FAILED, SEE RETEST "
Earth Technics
,
. !
TABLE ]I
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
JOB NO.: 98133-01 NAME: INGRAM 5/2/98
DATE:
SOIL TYPE CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM OPTIMUM
OENSITY (PCF) MOISTURE (%)
'A On-site silty sand with clay, dark brown 129.2 11. 7
'B On-site silty sand with minor gravel yellow
brown to pale brown Pauba Formation 132.4 9.6
-
~
i
EA'R'l'iH TI;,ewu.mQ