The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About012208 CC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting v.ill enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 22, 2008 - 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section: 1. Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotiations for the property owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, which consists of approximately 32 acres of real property located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Lane, identified as APN 909-370-002 and commonly known as the "Diaz Road Property." Negotiating parties are the City, Redevelopment Agency and RC Hobbs Company. City/Redevelopment Agency negotiators are: Shawn Nelson, City Manager, Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager, John Meyer, Director of Redevelopment, Peter Thorson, City Attorney and counsel Bruce Galloway, of Richards, Watson & Gershon. The City Council/Redevelopment Agency will provide instructions to its negotiators concerning the negotiation of price and terms of a potential sale of the property to RC Hobbs. Any action to approve a disposition and development agreement for the property will be taken in open session of the Council/Redevelopment Agency. 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 with respect to labor negotiations. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and California Teamsters Public, Professional, and Medical Employees Union Local 911. City negotiators are Shawn Nelson, Aaron Adams, and Grant Yates. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 08-01 Resolution: 08-06 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Prelude Music: Danny and Elizabeth Hahn Invocation: Pastor Jay Cartwright of True Vine Pentecostal Church Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Edwards ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar PRESENTA TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS National Wear Red Dav Proclamation Certificates of Achievement to the Temecula Golden Bruins PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 2 1 .1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Aqreement with GM Business Interiors for the Maintenance Facilitv/Field Operations Center - Phase II. Proiect No. PW03-06 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the First Amendment to a Purchase and Installation Agreement with GM Business Interiors, in the amount of $9,335.44 for the Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. 4 Approve the Sponsorship Request for the 2008 Temecula Sprinq Rod Run RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run Sponsorship Agreement with P & R Foundation and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. 5 Declaration Terminatinq the Local State of Emerqencv RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING TERMINATION OF THE LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY THAT HAD BEEN DECLARED ON DECEMBER 11,2007 BY RESOLUTION NO. 07-105 6 Approval of the FY 2008-09 Temecula Vallev Tourism Business Improvement District Advisorv Board Annual Report and Declaration of Intention to Levv an Assessment Aqainst Lodqinq Businesses within the Temecula Vallev Tourism Business Improvement District for FY 2008-09 RECOMMENDATION: 3 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) 6.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF 7 2008 Workers' Compensation Coveraqe Annual Renewal RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve a contract with Travelers Insurance Company, as the City's new Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier for 2008; for an estimated premium cost of $312,280, which begins on February 1, 2008. 8 Expenditure Authorization for Theater Ticketinq Software Services RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize additional payments of up to $20,000 with Vision One for ticketing software services at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater for a total contract authorization of $50,000. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit 4 for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 9 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the minutes of January 8, 2008. 10 Whitnev Vail Wilkinson Collection - at the request of Mavor Naqqar RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Consider accepting the donation of the Whitney Vail Wilkinson Collection at the request of Mayor Mike Naggar and to direct staff to develop an agreement to facilitate the transfer of the collection to the Temecula Valley Museum. 11 First Amendment to the Aqreement with Kimlev-Horn Associates for the Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail. Proiect No. PW01-27 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $27,345.00 for additional design services necessary to revise the irrigation plans and for construction staking of jurisdictional limits for Murrieta Creek. 12 Amendment NO.1 to Aqreement with Securitas Securitv Services USA. Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Amendment NO.1 to the Agreement with Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for security services at the Dog Park in Redhawk Community Park and various other security needs in the amount of $52,000, for a total agreement amount of $100,000. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING 5 RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 13 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the minutes of January 8, 2008. RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT 14 Redevelopment Department Monthlv Report RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing 15 Certifv a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. Adopt Statements of Overridinq Consideration. Approve a General Plan Amendment. Zone Chanqe. Development Plan. Tentative Parcel Map. and Conditional Use Permit for the Temecula Reqional Hospital Project 6 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07- 0201, PA07-0202) 15.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REMOVE EIGHT SUBJECT PARCELS FROM THE Z "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN" OVERLAY DESIGNATION AND CORRESPONDING TWO STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR A SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198) 15.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-8) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY-9 (PDO-9) AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.200 THROUGH 17.22.206, TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0199) 15.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: 7 RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ESTABLISH A 320-BED HOSPITAL FACILITY AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HEll PAD FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959 080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0202) 15.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL, A HELlPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0200) 15.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 32468, TO CONSOLIDATE EIGHT LOTS TOTALING 35.31 ACRES INTO ONE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0201) 16 Planninq Application No. PA07-0316. A Maior Modification for the Rinq Road Enhancement Plan RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0316, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PA07-0118 (PROMENADE MALL) TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RING ROAD 8 INCLUDING SITE MODIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ADDITIONAL ALL-WAY STOPS, ACCESS RECONFIGURATION, MODIFIED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE, AND AISLE CLOSURES WITH ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 17 Selection of Citv Council Committee Assiqnments RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: Commission Liaison (One Member) - Current Member Community Services Commission - Comerchero; Old Town Local Review Board - Washington; Planning Commission - Naggar; PubliclTraffic Safety Commission - Edwards 17.2 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Standing Committees: Standing Committees - Current Members Economic Development - Washington, Roberts; RDAlOld Town Steering Committee - Comerchero, Edwards; Finance Committee - Edwards, Naggar; Infrastructure Beautification Committee - Edwards, Naggar; Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee - Edwards, Washington; MurrietalTemecula Committee - Naggar, Washington; Public Works/Facilities Committee - Edwards, Roberts; Medical Task Force Committee - Proposed Addition 17.3 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Representative Assignments (External Organizations): Representative Assignments - External Organizations - Current Members Animal Shelter Liaison/JPA Representative - Edwards; League of California Congress - 2008 Voting Delegate - Washington, (Alternate Naggar); Murrieta Creek Advisory Board - Washington; National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2008 Voting Delegate - Washington, (Alternate Naggar); Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison - Roberts, (Alternate Naggar); Riverside County Child Safety Commission - Edwards; Riverside County Transportation Commission - Roberts, (Alternate Comerchero); Riverside Transit Agency Representative - Comerchero, (Alternate Edwards); Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors - Edwards; WRCOG/RCA Representative - Washington, (Alternate Roberts); RCA Representative - Edwards; Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) - Washington, (Alternate Edwards) g 17.4 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Ad Hoc Subcommittees: Ad Hoc Subcommittees - (Can be one or two members) - Current Members Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Edwards, Naggar; Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition; External Communications Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Edwards; Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition; Homeless Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Washington, Edwards; Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Washington, Roberts; Military Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Washington, Edwards; Nicolas Valley Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Roberts, Washington; Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Roberts; Promenade Mall Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Washington; Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Edwards, Naggar; Roripaugh Ranch Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Roberts; San Diego State University Visitor's Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Roberts, Naggar; 17.5 17.4 CONTINUED Santiago & Ynez Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Edwards, Roberts; Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Naggar; Transit Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Roberts, Comerchero; Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Edwards, Roberts; Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Comerchero, Edwards; Youth Master Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 18 Planninq Department Monthlv Reports for November and December 2007 19 Economic Development Department Monthlv Reports for November and December 2007 20 Buildinq and Safetv Department Monthlv Reports for November and December 2007. 21 Police Department Monthlv Report 22 Public Works Department Monthlv Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Council Regular, Tuesday, February 12, 2008, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 10 PROCLAMA TIONS AND PRESENTATIONS ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ otJ uC ~~ ~ "0 ~ "0 "O~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ., s ;,.,.~ " '1)'0 +-<...... E 0 .9 8 gp .... l.()~ ::::: 0 ;..= .;:: M ..... () ...... "M.D..c:; '" :: >-. ~ ~ .2 &]~.g -SI '" .". "'" "O...l:: 8 f;A- 0 ~ ~ .d ~ 00 ~ .~ii6 ~~ ~ ...l::~l-;.s~ ~ ~ ;:: 5; "0 () ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ OJ) "0 _ _ _.... 1:: ~ ~ = ~ .;:: ~ o~~ 8"0 ~ ~...... .+:::l ~ - 00 ~;::~ 00 - E ~ l-; ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 8 .~ ~ ~ OJ) >-..s ~~ _ 00 ;::...l:: 0 ..::.::: ~ 00 ~()~ p~ ~ ~ ~ t-- .... +-< ;:: ~~..,.. t;~ ~ :;;~.s gp.s "0 ~ l-; '";3 "0 ..... ~ ~ ~ :.c:_.... ~ ~ "O...l:: ~ +=< ~ E: - ..;.; 00 ~ ~ 0.. () ~ .~ ~ .s ~ 8 .s ~ l-; b .~ () 0 "~...l::_" .... .1:: () U':l ~ ..... ~S~ j~ ] ~ .;:~~~ ]~ _ '";3 00 0 '";3 - ~ ~ () "0 0 ~ ;:: ~ ~ '";3 "0" .~ '" " " ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 l-; .9 ~~ ~ .s ~ ~ .5 'a ~ - ~ 00;; ...l:: 00 "0 ~ () ~ () _ "0 ~;:: ~ 8 g ;; ~ ~ ~ .9 ~ '";3;!3 "3.s ~ or- ~ 00 ~ B () 0 oo...l::..... ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ()~"O 6';; ;;~5 OJ);> ~ .... ~ ~ ;::;..:::::: 00 ~;; "3 t:: ~~~ ;;~~ ~~'g ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~];; t;~ ~~~ o () "3 0 ~~ ;; .1:: .~ ..... _ () () 00 () ~ l-; ~ Q ~ 0 ~ l-; 8 S Z>6 ~;!; 1l~~ ~ SJ,;,,= ~ ~ 00 00 ~ - ~ .s t:: ;:: ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ "0 ~ ;3 "0 ~ t:: ~::; "0 ~ ] ;:: ~ ;:: ] ~ ~ ~ 'g ~ ~ .~ S ~ ;; '# (u~.::: ~ ~ .g g .s"3M~"O;:: ~ po ~ () l.()~ .t:i -S S 0 .~ ~ oo~~:oo~o '#Q~ ~6>-. o~ M~] .~ ] ] J ~ ~] € ~ ~ "0 () ~ ~.s 8 ~ 0 ~ d rhrhrh~ rhrh oo~rhrhrh ~~~oo~~il~~~ ~~~~~~,,~~~ ~~~S~~~~~~ :I:::I:::I::~:I:::I::~:I:::I:::I:: 1$ 1$ i$,s 1$ 1$ OJ) 1$ 1$ 1$ 00 " .2 ~ '" ;::l S Q ~ .s '-< <.E .", " ~ o d " ,s "'" o " " " '" 1:: o 0- .5 " ..c:; - "'" o " .S: - '2 OJ) o " " '-< .5 ",' "S " " S " I-< "'" " O.D Po eJ- 00' "0 ,so "",'" o -- .0 ~ g 2 u{l P~ eJ ~ ".", .s .1:: ...;~~ " 0 S "0 ~.::l '";3.;; '";3 ". ;:: o...l::"0 o l-; ~ 0 ~ o..~ a " " " 0.. ;; o.s ~.s;;~~ o '";3 ~] '-< " ~ .[) ...l:: ~ 0 .sl-;Z"O .s E .;:) 1Z:i ~~ ~~~]g ~ "0 ~-5 ~ ~"S,,~~ ~..8;g ~~ .~ 00 ~ _ 00 -.... - ~ 00 ;:) >-. ~~ ~ .5 S.D 0:: .:0 .80]0"" .", ~ '" ~ ~ s::::: o..~ ~ '" ~::J o::..c:; I(/'J..::.:::~t:i iJ ~ il:I:: " s;::J 0 I-<'~ 0"""" r- ~ ~;::l~i$:E: l-; ~ ~ 0 OJ) <.Ei$:I::2';~ .s ;:: gp ~ ~ ..... .g a 5b "'" 0> " o po 0 ,,' .", 00 " '" '" ~ ..i:r~ "'1:: '" '" ]] 1:: '-< ~~ ..c:;':< l-; .r= '01 ,s "'" o " ~ ..c:; " " ~ - 00 ~~ " 'i:l o 00 00 ~ ~ d: ~ " '" ] " ,s 00 '" ..c:; " ;::l 00 00 "0 o - OJ) .5 00 ;::l --- --- 6' ~ ~ ~ ~ ;... I:::: ~ ........ I:::: =: ~ ...... 'lo.; ~ ~ ~ gpg .~ ~ ~ .~ ~.", ;>,;, .D"S ~~ ~ ~ :E 0 -~ OJ);' .s () - '-< ~~ s~ " '" ~ .~ o..c:; " - ;>,8 .D ;::l ".", 00 " '" '-< " 0 00 _ ~ ;:: 1:: " '" S " 0 ..c:; ~ 1;: OJ) .s ;:: ~ .5 ~~ :E: 0 OJ) 0- ~ S " ".", ,s " .", '" " 00 '" i'J " " " " S ;, o ~ ~ '" ~.g 'g ~ 5;b ~ .s ~ ;>, .~ .D ] ;; - " ~ ;>, O..c:; ..c:; " 00 '" o " _ 00 00 " ~ .::: .~ ~ _ 0 .0 00 -.", '";3 ~ " 00 OJ);::l ~..8 .",- " " '" ~ '" 00 "S " " '" " " S " ~~ ~-ci P~ .~ '-< u.s " 0 ..c:; " - " "..c:; .~ - ;>'0 S - 00 "::;0 1) ~ 0 00 ,,'" o " , =;::l S ~ " '" "I-< ;::l l-; ~ s ] 0 ~ " P"'" ;> ..... 0 '" u ;>, ..c:; " '" ~..c:;"" ,- .", ~""''' o 0 0 ~'";3~ ~ ~ 'f ~CIlp :I::1J" i$';~ (/'J ~ 00 CJJ ~:E ~ ,,- 2';.","" ~ ;:: ~ - ~ tEl 1$.",,,, ~]] '-< o i;' ::;s ;,' OJ) OJ) '" Z ui "il '" ..c:; " ~ 1:: " o P tJ u' ~ 00' " " o ..., ~ " '" 00 ;::l CIl g ~ (')0 st-;;3tl:1~ o = '" S 2 '" ~ ~ ~Z '< 5' '--. en g 0 g ~ <> en 5' 5'''0 o = '""' (3 g~ a Pi;;3 ~ 8:6- "'- 0 S . en 0 (')... NOgst- .g:::: ro tffe..st- "8 = I>>~ ::l.~ "0 . ~. ~ -< ~o ~. N ~ "'. ~ g = 13 e:.~' !t ~. _ ~ ",-en e: .-..1 ~ = '" ~ fr en '< en . "'- "0 5' "'-:l;! ." 0 st- ~. ~st- ['" ,g ...., &l a~g- e: i:t. <> '" en 0 g 0 ~. ~ a 0. Ii "" ~. fi ~. '" g, '" q =", ... 0 s ~. =a~l-+) ~ '0 ~ [ Il<l = "0 8. 0 >-l ~ .. '" 8 !! st-- . t~~ ~ D Q .g 0' '" ." e:.e:. ~. e.. ~ =:e;:. f!! ~ o ;11>> S" :;.(') ;t ~ ~~ ~; ::s ~ 1-0' ~ g-1t~ !1i ':"l ~ t\\ ~ 'Si "'''8 ~ ~ .... ~ a::l. '" 0 ." 8 g ~~ tt'g, ~ fI' 0 s-al!!l ~:::.:. ~ 0 ...., [~ s"O Z. ;: ~ ~ s~ 8' ~a. ~ ~. 0 og I!l a - ~ :;. go ~ a ~ I:l ~t\\ <> (') ~, [ ~ ~~ e:. '" (') o a J5 ~ ~ ~\) - ~,r t~~ I:l ~. ~~ 8- "' .... :;. ~ ",q (')~ fr"O = '" '" ::t';: (1) it~ ~ ~ 0' ~ o' <> S 0 ~ = == ~ ~ g- ~,= '" '" = :!:! ~~ (')<>e: ~ re.. . ~. ~ ;: ;: a ~, I>> en ~ ~ ;;3 ."0 ~.I>> ~ s. ~ ~ S Jgll<l "0 = g ~ '" ~ ... ~ ~ ~ g ~~ ~. 0 0 c $S' o ~'s I = = < ~ ':S ! SO ~s. CI} """'''0 g Pi =-~. =: ~ ~ """0 1ZI ;: S en '" "':.s ~;;3 ~ ;: '-El- f 00", i ..... g,<2: : ~ 5 ...., a ~ :r ~ . g- en . [~ tl:I 8 e.. ~l8- Ng2: S. a I>> g",~ iil o 0 '" '" !'OClCll ""'0 a ~ Sl ~~ ~ ~- r (1) fr ~ "'- s- _.: <= !!.I:'l ~. I!l ~. ~ '" 1JiJ '" tl:I CI.l;s. . :E: a:: !o ~ ;. ~, ~ s' st- ~ [ ~.:'l e: o = st- '" - S = 0 '" is ~ ~ ...., >-l .'" 8 "'", ~ fI' ~;i a = ",-,g S :z: II g- g-~g t 5' a "0 a e.. ("l ." - I>> ~. e:. ~ '" 0 ("l J ~~ I I ~ 0 o - ;; t;!l;1fr ;l- Sl s,ll . '" = ~ ~ 00 S!->-3tp~ <" ... g 0 ... ... S ... l!l ~Z '< 8 .~. gj ... > >-3 ~ e:a ... a- Q.. 0 3 . '" 0... ~08S!- '" 0 f.~ ~;s:. e- '0 ..., '0 g E.... o "tI ;:1-8: 01>><" ~ <,,' _. N -. tp <: s:' ~ 8 o 2 e:. N' Q.. . It S' -... '" i:': .-..1 ~ '" ~ iil ~~ '0 -. Q..:!!"tI0 a-o [t'tlO~ i:':B ~~ g ,2ls:! ~8. fi ~o .........~ ::l -. = (tl.... 0 '0 .aa8'~ g g Jg 0 N 2.. s;;3 ~ o ... ~; ~ 8.~~ (\) 8 a e:.6' ~ 0 ~ ~g '-'E. _. ~ 8 ~ ~ I>> S" ~ [~ S l!l o _. :: ~C"':l ~. ~ ... 0 ~ S!-g<" ...~ Ii" 0 ... 0 ~ ~ (\) .~ :a 0 g'g "tI i:I C ~ ~~ ~ ;:I- 6'<11 g~ 0 ....~ I:: ~ ~ ~ ::t ..... -. ..., 8,.<1 ~~ <..; - 8' 8'0 lS'~ ~ 05 l!l ~ !!? ~ ::: """. R~ ~ ~. <" ... n (t) er ~ is' l:l ~ ... 0 o a<JQ -. (\) e:. ~ :::r g,"'''tI ~ ~ [ ~n ~~ - 6:9 ... Q.. I>> ~ ~ > '" liS' ::: S! ~ (JQ(JQ S'~ S. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :::!9 "E.08 ~ '" 0-'8 I ~ ... I:: E. ill .... o < c is'' ! ~ 1I~ 00 CijO "t:$ ~ ~~ I>> e: -.- f "t:$O 0 FA' c .....a- ~>-3 . 0 a ..... S! ~ !!l '< 2 I>> 3 0;;'... S! ~ i~ 5 ..., 0 (\) ...... ~ 2 . S!-.... ~ o '" . ,,"" tp ~~ (JQ ... ~ ""!!l2 gQ.~ S. s.~ ~;;OQ.. ~=~ ~ ... ... r ~~ is: ~g: 00... ~ fI' ~ ~ ..., >-3 ~> (") ~ $~ Q.. e:. 1>1... 0 l;' ~ 0 ~ :'" 0 '* Sl m o~- s,a ~ Ii" . ... 0 ~ ~ no g-;;3tJ:l~ 8 " g ::s ~ ~ ~Z '<32" -.'1:1 Cil ~ ~ g 5''0' ::s .... 5 " o c:: r:I.I -. ~~ Cil _'""'::S " 3 c. "" ;;3 ~ '" 0 Qi ~~~st '8..... ~ .0 +>.- g. ::I.~ ~ ~e..t:tl 8-~ -. IV o ::s "" (') ~ g 5' tJ:l <:-. 1t ~ a~' ~i e: ..-....J ~ '" g '1:1 _. a-::S c. '< '" e:~ '8g- 5~6'~ ",'(') Cil'1:l ~~. C. ~" ~g ,ESt. ~. ~ s g ~ <: " -. " ~ 0. ~. ~~o g c. J2l g ~~8'~ oa g.- ~ ~S t:tl .g g " "C ~ 8-~~ ~ -.... as- ~ rijog ~ ~ :EYe. ~g- o ;;3 "" S- D ~ =' 5' a'" gon g.t:tl(') ~ ~ ",'1:1 ~o ("D (b 0 St<(') ;:t~ . 0 "Cs::S ... ~ ~ ::I. !!l.~ S-....~ ~~ 11l ~ "5i;:;O 0 8..Cil c :::: ..... 05 3.g - ~~ l:: .., ~ ~ 8' E!l Cil !!l. ~ t;?'~ 0 (') " '" -. "' =: is'~ ~ ~ [ "n n"J2l ~ S' ~.r g ~ ;: !i 5..St< ~ ..... - ~c.J ~ ~ ~ -. 11l ~ 8- go '1:1 Cil -l l:l.. == ~(') ~~ ... ... t'"' _. ::s 8 0 ~~ ~ -.8 ~ -. g (') ::s ..,~ ~~ ~'" " " 0 l:l ;: ~ g- e. .g. ng::s ~~ W~ ri>>e: S-~ ;;3 J2l0tl -. '" ... =: :! 11l ~ ~ :9.~ '1:1 ::s l'l ~ s. ;: ;: ..... ! -.08 .. .. ~. ~ 11l ill . 8 -. ~ ~ '" ;::;.3 I ... .., ~ gg. ~ ~ l:: ~ ~ ::r"''1:I ~iS" i~ Z '" " -. c)" ~ ~ ~;;3 1='=~ ..., ! ~ ~ [~ - ~ ~ o-s 'I C go 50" ;: ~ .....::s ;: "'!!2 ::s Oe. J2l' g- 1t 8...l"l ~ Cil "" ~ ...... r ~o~ s.,o g."C~ 1:;- ~~ ~. "gc. i~ Cil 1il " ~ !!!.l"l $ tgS! n; <8 ..... fl: " E!l e- iZ g [ ;0 ~. gtJ:l <:'~ " ~.~ '" ~. ~ 00' . .l" ~ ~ -. g. ~ ~- ?<' g fI' " r = ::s 0 g- z ~" 3' ~ ~:;-l () j ,[ (') ::s c..g 8 l~ 0 ~. g. g- g-~g () ~ [ ~ $31 ~ '1:Ise. '< - "" 51 ~ " gJ. ~ ' :'" ~ 0;;3- t;il go . ,,::s ~ ::E! (")0 st-;;3tIl::E! " '" o ::s " a ~z ~ 13 6. '" f)j '" g ::s '0' '" t;! ~ " '" S' 5''''' 5 '" ~ Eo '"' (3 IlO ..., ~ &:8. ~~ "" 0 8 . '" (")... NO",st- '" 0 f.c .j>.-"st- "8"" .j>. "" = ~Q' "8 g 5" ~ 8. ~. _. N _. t;C -<;:;." g 0 a 2 e!.~' '" 0 (ll er- ~. ~ e:,;-J gj '" ~ F;l "" -. ""~"Oo st- ' ::s " ~st- =- "'08 "" e:~ ~t;! ~ " '" 03. 5 i ;; '" . 15 0 2'15 ..0 _. < Q.. """. ~8. ~ ~. "''''",,< 5 _. = ~ '"'1 0 g W- '0 ~a~~ QQ ::s ~as;;3 ~ ~ a st-- ... gj <:T 13 '" "0 ? ""5 g ~ D ~s e!.s- $! . Eo ~ ~ ~. st- ~ 13 o i;l1lO S" ~ ['" 5 III ::s -. ~ ~o 3-. ~ st-"'::S "''8 It(") It" Sl ~ (\) ~ a "",0 '" s 0 ~ ~~ !" ~ "0 ::s ~~ ~ ~ 0 f!~ s-t;!~ == "" ..... -. at;! ~~ <;.oj - ~ n S' 13 'El E' s~ 0 05 III ",- ~ l:: b= ~ ~. - " '" !Ii !!t is'' [~ ~ '" (") (") -. S ~ o a iJ -. (\) 8. ~. r ~a~ ~ ~ l:l... ~ ~<J ~~ t;! ""l n~ ~ l:l -. ~~ It"" ~~ t'"" ci" ::s '" :S (\) ~ s " 13 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ -'1;l '" '" ::s Ie: (")" ~~ ~ ~ =-Eoe: ~ !:! ;;3 ."" SIlO'" s. l:: ~ ~ ~i S'~ s. ~ ~ ~ ~ 13 'S!.08 ~ '" g 0-'13 ~ ... l:: -. '" ::s <: I c is' Eo j;.l . ~c;.;'~ ~ ~ 'S~ ! ~ IlO It~ - -..... ~ ~ '" '" . 0 . c "" ::s '" "'3- ~;;3 0-[ 'I ~ ~ ! '< 2 ~ ~ ~ [~ IlO :3 5 0 g i ...... ::s 8 g ::s'~!il' tIl "'12 6. t;! ~ QQ '" gj g ~ st-"O"" ~ o 0 '" ~ '" ~Ofl} ""0 t;!~Sl {/.l ijl~ is: ~ ~ ~ "" iZ .r -'" -l"l <: ::s III _.~ :e: ~ ~ ~. '" a:: _.tIl "'~. . s:o ~ o 2 ~ '" - i i '" _. o' =r' -. .., =- ?<'1;l ::s;~ '" . .'" ~- 9' .~ ~~ ~ ~"""" fI' ~ "0", Z ::s ""08 :3 t ~r ~ ~::E!g ("l S' '2.e~ ~ g,s ii "0 ("l a:: ~~ "" f ~ ~ 0 n ~ . . 0 * o;l- Sl g,2. ~ ~ . '" ::s . .~ ('") ~. ('") ~ '" 5i ! ~ 5' ii .'" ~ g: [ fI' :z: t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2! t[~ . Q.:j "'g2 gc..~ !>CQtn E!l~ S. = !!.i"l ur -0 So -..:"! '" - iif ~(i ,ii ~ a 5.~ ~~ a, a. g ~ ~ a S''E! S'-8 ~, i:l. .'" 0 '8'" ::\.0 ~ ~ i:l. ",' ~, a S'- ~. (') a:!!l. '" ~, Z'g ~8- III e. 8 0 s a ~S" !ii'S'- ~~ a"8 f" ::\. o .., S' ~ - 8- g g- ~ o (') E. III ~ f ~ ~. ~ ~, ~ a: 3 (') ~ ~. a (')0 o = ~z ~ 0 = <ii g 3 (')g" =-.... ~ .0 ~, N ~ g =- .-..1 ~. '1:1 ~. rj"= '< S'- (') 0 g 0 ..c ~. ~ ~. ::! ~. 1;3'0 (JQ = g-:;; !!?!!?.. ~ ~ 5 l!l g-Q ~g, !!l.o a~ o~ (') 0 ~ Q f!l, 9 g-'1:I t"" 0' ~.= ~'" sa: s,'1:I ~i ~. 0 a:" &1J if ~"" III 8 ~ 2 ~ ~ o Cl "'0 is: <8 o 0;1 S2 '" ;:;' s:aOfii , ~ = g- "'CI ~ l!l f~~1 (/.l ('tl = 0 8 a ~ S' .... -~ a 0 8 ~. NOoS'- tffe.g- "8 = III (') S' 0;1 ~ a: fZ 5. _ ~ ~&l~&l i:l.:<! "'CI 0 =-00.., III .... '1:1 S'- i:l. 0 ~ 0 l!9, 5 eJ (') < Q... = -. ooo~ = ~.... 0 =aEP~' '1:100"" N c:;:... '* ('\) ~ 8-~ ~ :E . E. o "" III = t:r,.... ... 0 = g-g8 "'CIs = S~l 3'g _ l!l ~ III (') 0 g. o sa. (JQ ~aS( S ;;l ~ g s 0 (')~;. ::r - -. eJ III '" i::l S'1ll 'E, 0 8 o ~'", = -< '" l'J) tij""'O e: cr =-: '?:.~ 000 =..,= ::I. S'- fZ Jg 0 ~ S'-~i:l. 000 ~ ~ 81 t i:l.1l l!l ~',,: l'J) ;S.~. o f!l. S'- ~ g S'- = 0 0 Ill"'"" = "'CI 0 i:l..g S g-~~ 'g.eJlO ~aCl 6 ' 0 ~s: 5fl 0 . = ~ S' :i !; ~ n~ ~ !\ ~l'l ~ ~ !Ii III ~ ~ nit ;r~ ~ ~ -6 ... =:. Ii: ~ s. a .. I ~ ~ ~ ~ l:l,., S. <l> ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ;: ~ <l> (") ~ s.D <l> ~ C ::l ;: ~. ...- iil~ ::l S. ~<l> ~(J l:l -. l'l~ it~ ~ ~ Si Si ~ ~ -;: c is'' ':S g Si Si ~ ~ ;t~ ~.~ ..... ~ ~ "'" _ ~J ~~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~:! ~ ~ ~ :: 00i S' S ..... g ~ (")0 f~g~ " o ::s ~ ~ ~Z 5'''0 <l ~ 1Il g 1;]''0' e:8 g g Sl g, --- 5' ",' !:lo 9~ 8.. Il> ~ g '8 ~ IV~8S: ~p ts:g ::l.e. "Ogg,!f ~. IV o Il> ('l @l . ~ g S'f <::=.' !:lo'" fit ,~~' g ft- e: ."1 'S!: "0 5' 8. ~ 1;] SO ,,' e: ~. 0% 5' ~ ~ 0 " !f ... "0 ...., '" 0 0 !:lo" SO i~ B~ 0.9, IS ::;;:" 5 ;s. < !:lo a (") " !:lo 5' 5' g *'~~. ~ ~ O<l ::s .giS'S, 8 s. !f:;; ~ ~--i .ij0' 9 8.~g ~ =-:e- ~s ~>-,g ~ ~" lS ~ g;l~ s- D "'8 8- SO" 5' II ~ Q ~::l. " (") ~ (b Q So(J 0 ~o ~ei ~i ~~ ...., a~ (l> C 8' ~ l:: "5i~ 8..g C ;:s ~ i ~ ~ ~ l:: ~ ~ ~ g. ~8 ~-:. ~ S"~ ~ ~ - " (") (")"i:l',~Q' == 8. ~, [ os.Jg ::t l [So ~ .... ft-"O ~8.."l:l ~ ~ ~ -. (l> ~ S' ... --ill> ~(J ~~ t'"' o' g"g, niil: So ~ !f ~'1;] 880 ::-~ (l> ~~ ~~ Ie: (")g::s l:l ~~ ~ ,'t:l i:l"~[. ~ ~ (l>' s.~ ~ ~i ~ 5' ~ C:;' 15. ~ ~ ~ ~,08 ~ ~ ~. ;: ~ ~. ! ~ ~. ." g :it 8 I ~ (l> It SO .... () ~ ~ l'A -."'t:J l:: e: 21, - ~ ~i5'" gos- '" " "0' 0 fit' <:::> ~ =: c,<2 ~ o%--i . ::s S <:::> g is'" 9 [~ Il> " ~- ~ := '" ~ o " ~ ~ t;C . ...., if "'!!l2 ~' ~ ~ Jgso 8",/:I!l " @l ~ ...... f ?Oo~ s'o !f~!:lo ~~ ~ i~ " " <l~al ~ !!!./:I!l oe. ~ g 1J,l g, -g ... ~ ;i !!l ~ g j "'. ;0 !!J- S'~ [ ~ fit' . Vj.:r:s r '" 5' ~ ~. SO ~ ~; ?<'Vj gso I" " ~ := 0 " f ~" 8 ~ ~~~ () ~ r g. := !:lo.g 8 ~. 6.~ 8- !f !f::;;:g () ~ l "Oae. ~ ~ ~~ _ Il> Sl ~ ~"o g,2. I ~ 0 o ;l- !!l 5Jl ft- . ,,:= . g $ ()O go:;::: 0:;::: o ::; ellS 0 ~ 8 ~ ~Z "t:S 6:c...... '" - ('D 0 - '" (;! ~ ~ ~ ::; S' ~."" g s ' . ::; 8 ~ ;l ~ ~. &:8. ()ir JI' '" S' go '" '" 0 ::r'" g-;;3~g- "" ..., S :0 o 'Tl ,<8;;3" ::\.~ "" . tI.l ~ a _. ~. N III 5' ~ g "E. ::to ~. o '" ~ ~~. (;! '" " ~.g Er. .-..1 Q..oE.~ "" ~. NO"'O go ",' a-::; ~-<..., ,<go ~Q..a Er.lt " '" -g8"g- '" Q.. g 0 S' tl:l '< () :? 5' ..c ~. ..... a "tI~. ~a Ii ~. '" ~. 0 ~ ell o' 5 ~. III ~ "" 0 ~ '0 '" ::; (JQ ::; Q..~:;:::"" g III ::r"'s'"" '" o Q.. go- ~(;!",s ~ (J Q .gg. '" "tI aa (JQ 6 '" '" ~ ~. :::g fS ~ -. Q.. ~ (") S" ;i '" 0 E. S-D :t ~ [..... 5 III =:s ~g r:o :i s ~ ~ [~. ~ ~ '" ~ 'Si 8 go Q..() ~ C ;:s N ~ '" 0 N Q..Co n~ ~ ~. ~ ~ C1l (l'>::; '" lll' ::; ~. .gj a~ i3 Q..;l <!!l ~ '" 0.; "- ~ 0 0 8..(;! ~ '" a ~f') l!'loI. S<Q., ~~. ::\. 05 o ro+ 5.. '" I: ~ ;:s S- o " '" ::s: ('tl a ... S' l l!'loI. ~'" ..., "'() g- s~. ~ ~ ~(J ~~ 8' lll::r ~ ~ ~ ra.s "tI.g 'Tl ~ l:l -. ~~ nit ~ ~~ a It,,,, a....~ ;:o~ l::<Q., ~ ~ o ('1l 100". - t""lo' ~ 1Il ~. 8- ~.~ ~ ba ~ ~ ~ ~! iEr. a Eli' '1::i ... := := s ."" ()8..0 -. I: ~ ~ g '"" 0 ~ S. l!'loI. ~ .~ go ~i ill .., N ~ ~ ~(t)::S ... l:: ~ ;: '" (;! ~ Er. ~ C El ;;3 I ~.", ::; '" ':'S S" ~ . 8 E. ~ ~ ::: ~ ~ (te- 1::0 ~ '" '" ()"'" 1::0 e. ~.O 'I .....3- $,"" r::;8 := .... '" '" O'E.. i !!l '< Z '" 8 ! ".~ ~ "t:S -.-. '" '" ~.< [ . g,::! - 8e. o tn. g ::; ~. ""!!lz (;! '" 3':88 8...};l g,~ !=lOot/.) tl:l "? -/Z (/J 8l~ e. ~- o g, III c !l.: ~ '" It sgoQ.. ! !!!.l"l <::; '" tl:l . '" '" ~ U; $ J5 "tI Sl a:: -0 sa go!t::\. ..... (;. So '" ~. g c;..:o'l ~. ~.::; '" ~ '" " [ ~g: ?< '" (;! !t ~. .l" '" ~ ::r te:go a:: 5" " '" ~ ~" ::; .~ f ,if ..... III ;S. go !I 8 go 1Il ra.'" ("l ~ ~ g ;;3 ~. a a:: $~ ~. ::; g, ~ ("l [ ~ ~ ~ llla'E. Sl g,B. Q.. "" '" .... o ~ .l" .~ (j ~. (j ~ '" ~ ~ :: I fI' ....3- !!l '< 2 5:r~ ~!!l- . ...-l "'!!l2 gQ.~ !>>oc;n ~~ _.::: !!!.1"l '" " g 1"l -0 =' C;;'''''!r1 ~;: " ':l! ~" ~r &.8 $~ a, 2. ~ $ ~ ~ S.'O ct.g =:. Q.. '" ~~ g,ti ~ ~. Q..'-:: ~. ~ goa ,.,. -. ",.'" '" a a> o' ~g ., Q.. g I[. o " .g a =:S" '" ~W a~ Sf' ::l. o ...., S' ~ - 8- is" W i a s; ~ i I:l:I a ~. ::E: " ~. '" :r' e: 3 8 a [ ()O g :; 1t'Z iil ~ 5 " " 3 ()~ !.o _. N g 8 ~:-J -S. S' ~.... 8 If :; ti ,.c _. ~ ~. .... -. ....0 Jil :; go- " "C ., eo -0 ~ 3 S el It() o 1t'g, a. G aiil 05 '" " " () ~ :r' 5:8 ,,'0 t'"'lo' -.:; 'jg.'" ee: =:. '0 JilOQ "C8 -." j;l . li.... '" If ~;;3 ~ ~ ~ ~ s'o ~e.. "It <:; " tJ:l is" a '" ". sr (;5 . ~ W "C ., 0- ~ go;;3tJ:l::E: ~ 3 5.~. '" " :; 0 (":I !3 t'I.l _. 0... ~I-t """I _........J""" " ., ...., ..: Q..osa.: NO"P'" ""'-"'.... ""'ltE..lf "8 :; ., '" loo'. t::tI -< =-. a a eo N. {/.l 6' - (D ~ '" ~ &l Q..:;: "Co :r'''o''''' ~ iil ~ W fJ,9. S 2l _() <: Q.. i:l . """q =' ~ """I 0 .g~S'::J NQ..s'('tl ".,0-3 .... :; '" " !:J Q.. == (') '""E.. ~ :..,., = =" S' go~", " " g "C8f!9 Siil~ 3'0 _ el iil a [Ii -. ():;Jil o _ :s " ti ~Q..2l iil ;;3 s. :; 3 " '" - " " Sl ()"'- :r'E..e: 2l ., '" i:l s.., '2. ti ~ o _.0 &l :;..g =-~. - _. 0 -. ~ l:S ~ ti;;~ g.~~ OQ " ~ go"CQ.. " g " ~~~ -Q..", el -. .. :;.:;: v~ IZI -. g -. go ~ g go :; 0 " ., ""'-l :; "C " Q...g 3 W::E:2 '0 2l ~ ~~o , . 0 o - t;l;llt J"I G = ~ S" :! ~ ~ g~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n~ ==-~ Q ~~ ~. l::: ~ s. ~ '" I ~ ~ ~ [ ~ ('> ~ ~ ;: l!!OoI. ~ ~ == ~ ~ ~ ~ ('> (") ~ ~('J ('> g c ;:s ;: ~ ..... -. c.; -.. ~~ [~ -. ('> ~ (") l:l -. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ S! S! ~ ~ ... ;: c is'' ':s~ c S! S! i ~ ;a~ c:::..;:o ~I ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ == Oii SO S ..... f :: -':l! Sl ~ ~ \.10 st-...,t:C~ C'> '" o ::s '" '" 2 '" ~ ~ ~Z '< :3 _.~. (i1 ~ [Il 8 &1 s. 5."" o E."'--::S a g S (i1 l'" ..., ~ e:8. '" g" "'- 0 S . \.I... NO",st- '" 0 1.0 tffaW- ~ ...., o ~ "8 ::s l'" C'> :4-..: ~. t:C <: ~. ~. N :a 2 e?. ~. ~ ~ 13 0 '" 0 t/.l _. _ ~ "'- . :r,;-J ~&1~&1 '" ~. 8: ~. "" ~. "'-:;: "C 0 a-::S &3'''' 0 ...., st- ~. -..: st- ",-(i1~W- e:f.l C'> " '" - 13 0 ~. 8. a 0. ~. ;;:13 .0 ~. ~ ~. ",,, "'~ ~ 8- ::s ~ '"'1 0 ::l ~. ~~~~ ~ .0 8 a Jg ::s """'0"" N Q...... CD (\) st-- a ~ [~ o B '" "C ~ (") Q 8 - e?.S- . p..-n .q "" - :;:YE. =:0 fS 8 o ; l'" S" ~ ~('J ;"l ~ '" st- ::s ~. ~ ~'" 5 l!l st-"'::S _C'> ~ ~ (\) ~ 'Si g~ frb' '" '" 0 ~ ~ .... ~ _0 <t>i;, "Cs::S g~ ~ ~ r> :4 S-(i11 ~ ~::::. 0 !a", ;: ~ l:l<Q, ...., '" (i1 8"" ~t: =:t ~ .... S' "'-::s l!l (i1 !a [~ ~ ~. ~ 08 '" ~. ... is' l:l C'> \.I B ::s ~ ~ -. (\) ~~ '" \.I o _0<> ~ ~ ~ ~ (") - ~. r ~2.~ ~ l:l -. ~~ 8- (i1 ...,~ ~il: ~~ fr"" ::s S :=: ;:;;~ (\) l::<Q, ~ ~ 5 ~ cr g t"P 0 ~ b:I ~ ~ ~ ~.&1 \.IC'>::S ~! W- Ie: (\) (\) :rE.e: "5 ... ::i ::i ."" S l'" '" s. t: ~ ~'l'" s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;' 0<> "0 ::s g a .. ~ "Cs .... ~ ! ;: ~ ~. 0 0 ~ C tl o ~.8 I ~. '" ':'S ~ a Pl" &1 ~."O ~ g l>> t)j W- e: o' =: ~ ~ "0 ::s '" ::i 0 ~;;' o-~ ...... ::i ~=- 0 ~ ...... ,<Z f l'" 8 o B c::r~ [Il 8 !3. ~_ ~ ~!l- ::s '" o = 0<> '" ~ - ""., t:C (i1 l>> st-"C",- "'!lz ~. gQ.~ o 0 '" 8 '" ?OefIJ ""'0 (i1~61 '" Sl~ ~ is: ~ e: ~ c ll.= -'" ~ !!!.to!J < ::s l!l . ~ l~ ~. '" t:C '" ;s.~. 55 ~ '" - S!:: o' ~ ... g; :;.0 g} '" . o ::s st- 0 -.", [><'&1 .~ '" - e: ::s 0 '" ~ j[ 8 ~ ~....,..., "C", ~ fI' C'> ::s ",-.g 8 I a W- W- ~ g .('l ~ ~ -. ('l [ ""8- "C _ l'" ~. 5.6' f l'" '" 0 ('l S!:: t~ '6:"9. ~ ~ t;ll;fr Sl ::a, a . ,,::s ~ ~ (")0 g-""tl:l::;:: <ll a <ll o = '< 9 -....... ~z <ll = 0 ~ ~ ctI n l'/.l _. ~ ~. 8 E..q = '" ~ l>' <ll ~. -.'t:l = <ll = 0 8 9 ""09st- e: = . (")g" NO<llst- ."" .j>. - <> '" 0 ::r.... ~g.e..(D '" "'" 8 0 't:l = l>' <> '8(") 't:l . S. tl:l <: a: ::1.0 _. N a ~ ~ ~ ~ g 0 '" '<ll i3l ~'< '" 0 "" ",. e: .-..l 8.~~g, ~. !t 't:l 9' [@~g- st-e: ~st- e:f;l <> <ll ~. f 8 g. '" t:t. o 1:1 a>g = -. ~ ~ ;s. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~8. <ll '" ~a~~ <l> 5 -. ~ '0 (J CIt> = 2.s.('\) ~ ~ ~ ~ . -. ~ ~ st-- ~ ~ ~ ~ <ll ~ . ""'-'E.. s.g 9 a ~. S" ~==- ~g !!!..o o ;Is. ~ <l> S ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~g- 8.; = " ~ ~ c (') ~ 0 st--<> II:: _. <ll " 0 <l> 0;-...... '" "1:18= ~~ S<Q., g'8 " 0 ~ ~. ~= 5-~1 :: ~ ~ yt::l "" ~ ~s. g, It.... ~ ~ "" ~= ~ -. <l> ~~ ""g ri g. .. S' l:l ~ Q 8' 08 ~ ~ ~ <> QaClt> (") ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ Q = " (") <l> .... S. ~ (;lp.o {"')~ =:<Q., 6:8 ~ ;l ~ <l> 8. ==-:: .... . ~ ~ :!:! (D ~. 596 l:l !::Ill ~ ~ ~ 1:""0 " 8 = ~ .. ~ ~ ~ s -.= (")=e: ~'" s. !!. <l> (') - g. .g. =-"ii'CIJ ~ ;:: if 8 S'~ :: a ~ c l5'" 51 S" "" =CIt> 'E!. 1:1 8 '" ~(') ;~ I S o _. 9 ~ ~ ~ ::s ;:S."'CS " ~..s. '" '" ~ E. t:r' """. =-: ~ ~ ~ -'0 CIJ '? :.. [ ~ <l> l>' '" <ll ~ 0 ~"" 1:10" 0 l>' S ~ "'" = .....3- f . go fir ~ '< 2: 8 8 CIt>"~ ~ (:E st-"I:I"" . ~ tl:l ~ ~ (D g ('\) loJ~2: ~. 00 ~ ~ Sl 8.,.~ ""'0 000 iif ~""FZ . 31 " :E ~ :r= el ~:~. '" -. = '" !!!.l"l <ll tl:l ~ fa. e- g [Ii := ~. sa ~ g st- ~. .. l"l g;. gl. S' a:: -0 = 0 " e: ."'l [- ?< '" ""'"" ..... [ ~ ~ "1:1" g '" - ",,09 :E:r J.l " !;! 8 't:l 8 a:: ?' Qg. a g- g-lE.. z , 9 't:l l>' .~ t ~ i S' "1:1 ~~O [ !!!.. ('J 6,0 0 6' s.. ~. a:: ~~ ~ t;il;lg- ('J .!;! . " ;; Sl o 2- iil- ...., ('")0 st-...,o:l~ '" ~ " 8 " o 1:1 ~ 8. ''0' ~ " ~Z r:Il (tI ~ t.... ~ III <'> <'> 1:1 ~ " (l ~ [~~:l. 1:1 " ~.'" ~ g. 08st- 1:1 <3 NO"st- g:[ Q~ .,J:;o.6:2o '" 0 ~,,- Sp "t:S ~ ~ o. '" ...., ~. o:l e:~' g,g ~.tv ~ ~ '" ~.- ~ 0" " '" ~ '" '< 0 !:lo 1:1. e::.. . !:lo$Ja'...., '" :l. ft '" 1:1 [~'" st- st-e: ~st- "~;; e:g <'> " OQ 5 S ~. ~ o 0 ~'!:lo ~ (fJ i:t. ~ :;r <: " " ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ l\) l" ~. .s~8';;, Q ~ g fa. " 8- '0 OQ 1:1 N !:lo Er 8 ~ q ~~ ~ I[, ~; ~ tsg ...g 8 " S" ~ 8 a e..e?. :E' j;" ~ ~s:: ~. o ;l ~. ;: l\) ;:l N "'... '" 0 c "" ~ ~ =-:0 o 8 1:1 " 1:1 ~ ~ s:: _. ~~ 5 III st-...<> ~. ... - " ~ g C'l~ ~ ~~ ~ N. !:lo('") ~ 1.1 ~~ a.g *'g, -"'8" ~ l\) ~ [~ ~~ o " ~~ S" ::\. s-~ 8'" - -. l\) 0 III ~ ~. ., so ~ :::: ~ Q ...., !:lol:l ('")gcffl ~ ~q ~~ S' 0<> "" ~ l:l.. ~ <> " 0"'0 ~ ~ g Q ~2.=: l\) ... :t~ "...,- C'l~ l\) ~ ~ i!:! - fa. S Ci (D g ;:r;:: ~ 3! 8- !:lo", 5 8 0 Q l:li:I ~ ~ " -. 1:""0 ("l) g = ~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~'I:I ('")e.e: ! =: s i! ~. E ~ ... s:: ~P>'" ~ . c is"' S- f;- -.., ~ ~ " ~i 1:1 g 'S"" ~ ;;' 'S. 0 0 I ~ o ~'8 ~ ~ = ;s.~ ~ 3! ...... ~." :s..~. =-: ... . ~ E.. !!l.... -.0 {IJ ~ ~ go l' :. ~ ~ ., a"..., 00" ~ '< " 5....., ~ ., 8 '-82 f l'l " cffl ~ ~ ~;~ o E.. st-d'!:lo ~ [~ o:l (l ., " " " 'ivg2 8. g,~ (l :E Sl 8Q.~ ~ ~s: ~~~ 000", . 81 ~ ~ 2.8 III ;s::l. ll.= <: '" '" st- f " " o:l " ~. !!.l"J :l. ~. ~. ~ g st- [~ g} 1:1 0 " :IE ~ ....,..., 2:;oJ ~ ~ ."" 0- I '" - ~ !:lo.g 8 ~ ~:r 1:1 ~l[ " !! 8 ~ fI' = " ~ ~:r g. '" ., z ~ g ;f ~~o j 2- 6' 0 J"l = S 0 ;l~ ("l ~Si ~ ;Jl"1:I q' ~ ("l ""[ " ~ fa, ;!- ... g ~ ~~ g-;;3IJ:1~ 8 " Bl ~ ~Z ~ ~ S.~. S''g g Sl '" Cl 0 &:8 '" " o e. ~ S' " 13 ~ ~ ..., ~ ",' Q. r~ Q. " o 13 . '" 0 ~o"go "0"" g,(") -I>-6:"'go [I "0.0 ~ S e.. ctl o'tv o ~ '" s.1J:I <:~. iil8 ft ~ e?. !:t. ~ ;. e: .-.J ~ . (i" ~ "0 ~. <rCl Q. '< e:1i" ~g- [~;Cg, .Q. ~ "0 go '" ~. Z'a 0 ~. ~ ~ D- Cl t:I ~ o' ..c ~. = < " -. "" c< " Cl 5' 5' = ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ .g ~ S<:j 8 Q. 0<> Cl g-; III Q. ~ S .g~ .... ~ <r ~ ~S o e?." ~!a . Q..c (') ~ sO' @ ~ ~ . e. D o ;;l ~ S' ~ ~ Cl ~. ~ g- " Cl ~ ~ Ii"(") go-8 - " " ~C'l ~~ (po ~8~ ... ~ ;t~ 0 !!?~ ~~ ~ ~ c ::l. " .... S~ c S ~:::o 0 Q.~ 13 "0 Fi. ~~ !:: n .... ~ ..., $?8 el ~ g. ~ E;t~ ~ n S' ~ (") ~ :: ~ is' c 0 ~~o<> !'li S" ;:""" [ ~. r g.,[(") ;: [ ,..... ~ ..... ~ ~ e-it ~ - Ii" "0 ~ ..., ~ ;: ;:' [ .... ~ !l'<:l<J ~~ ~ o' 5 S .... ~~ l:l~ ~iil " " g ~ ~~ 0' Q ;: ~ g.. e. .g. (")"'0 ~ ~ -~ g- Cl"=Cl s.~ Ji10<> 8 s; ~. ':-l ~. e: -. :: ;;3 [.~ "0 Cl '" <:l S' ~ ~ ~ ~. S ~. t:I ~ i)! .. ~ o _. ~ ~ Cl < I ... n ~ ~ ~go '" ~'13 ~ ~ !:: ~ ~ 2: = '" " .g. 5'''0 ~ ~iS" s; .'f..., . Cl- ~ ! ~ ~ :r ~ ~ ~ s o_;.io ...... 8 . g,::j ~ ~ g ~. g, r ~ ~ N!;2 Oe. g-ft ~Q.~ Cl ~ ~ ~ ~ f . ., CIl I- 0 g-i!'[ ~~ ~~ S' = ~~~ ~ -l'l Y' ~~ ~ tdl ~ < Cl Ii ad: 0- f ;;:0 " IJ:I < ii 0' ~ ri fil'~. J" ri.i''"~ ~. '" . el o' go ~- ~. ~ '" ?< fI' " [ Cl" o Cl go Z ~" [- ~ Cl g,,, ~ ,if Cl ~;C;;3 (") ~ g Q. "0 13 q' g g- g-~g (") ~ [!; ... l3~ ~ ~. f ~ t~ 5 Sl " ~~~ e,2. Q. o ;;l- ~ Ii" . "Cl ~ ~ tiO g-;;lt:l:l~ " <'0 o i:l " ~z <'0 ill ~ ~ ~.~. gg <'0 ~.'tl til ~ 8 g ~~. i:l ... lHI &:8 as"~ ",' Q.. tig" Q..08~ '" 0 ::r.... NO <'0 'tl ...., 8 0 ts:"s- o ~ '8B~~ ::I..... 'tl . g.~ ~. N S' t:I:I <:~. o 0 1il 0 Iit~. a~' ~.~ e:.-.J gj (;' <'0 'tl ~. '< 1il ~~ a-i:l Q.. '!'! "1:1 0 ~ g- [~O~ ." til 'tl st- '" !!l. g 0 ~. 8. l 0- S' o' ~i:l ..0 ~. = <: <'0<'0 ~ <'0 gj ~ 00' = ~ ~ 0 5 ~. ~ Q.. '0 ~s-~~ 0<> i:l " g g-; NQ..S.~ ;;3 ~ a ~ g.[~ as ~ (l> - - '-'E- D {iiOO ~ 8 ~ ~ III ~ ~g- S ill i:l ~. S" ~ ~ s-<'Oi:l ~ i:l.{g ~ti - " ~C"l a. ~ <'0",0 lito ~o "1:1 8 i:l ... ~ (l> ~ . ::I. ~~ still ~~ "-l c ::s ~~ 0 <'0 til ~ ;:: <':> ...., Q..i:l ~~ ,... -. 8' 8] - 00 ..... S. ;?8 ill III lli ;: is' c ~ ~ ti '" t:t. ~ S' ::s~ ~ Q <'0 i:l ;:: ~~. !; oi:lO<> :: [ ~it 6:8 ~[~ ~ ~ ::sO ~~ g. ~ ~a ... ~ ~ I)Q (J <'O'tl g 8 gj ~lf !:l -. S t""1o. (l> <':>~ ~~ ~'i:l Q :: :=:~ Ie: '" <'0 0 g- ti"i:l ~$;' ~~ ~~~ "-l ~ .'tl (l> ~ ;;l 0<>0<> ~ S' ~ s. ;: ~ ~ ~ ~. ;,; ~ ~8 ~. 0 " a ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;! .<'0 ~ ~.o .... ;:: :::.8 I = !'t- ~ ~ ~i:r fO e: ~.~ ;,; ~ '" if "'l::J 0 _. ~ "-l g ! ~ 2] ~ ~..., . i:l '" III 8 0-[ ~ ~ ~ ~ :r ~ - Q.. 50<'0 ~ . ! =1 B 8 g . &:a i:l '" ~ --... "'!!l2 t:I:I til E- O<> <'0 gj gQ.l!!l 5. III '" ?Oo~ ~ :a, 0 g-ifQ.. ~ ill~ w~ til ~ ~ -.::c ~ e!.i"l <'0 ae. Q.. ~ ~ ~ " <i:l ::: <'0 t:I:I ill ~. .... .. i"l ~. '" :::.~ 0 [ ;0 Sa ~ '" . ii '" o'S- r;;'~ ::r '" ~. .l" ii e: ?<' o=s. .~ ~ 8 ~ i:l :a, <'0 :z: ~(ji gj "1:I;;l ~ ,ii 8 i:l Q...g 8 C"l ! ~ g. - s-~<'O ~. if <'0 " C"l ::: ,,,is 5 "1:1 'S!..3~ <> ~ t~ Q.. S ~<'OO * >l ~ I :"t 0 g,2.. o - ~;l~ . <'0 i:l . g ~ (")0 f~t~ o ::s ~ ~ ~z 00 (b = 0 - (i ~ (") (') UJ ..... 15'''' 0=.-..= 8 5 G <il iO ..., ~ e:s. G~ ~~gg: '" (")... ~s::~pto '" 0 1.0 "'..... ~ G e.. G o 0 '8 ::s III '" ~ ~. ~. IV ~.1;l:I <: S' g 0 ~ E. ~~. p,.--:: '" 0 ~. ~ e:."" !5l~5l '" S' p,. ,.; "'d 0 ptoG ~pto I:"GO..... e:S: !. <il ~ ~ .'" 8 G '" a lJ9. 5 8 0 i3' S' ::s 0 ..0 ~. <: p,. . ~ ::s PS ~. GGGq = ~)o't 0 G ! 5 ~. .a [ O"::J '0 III p,. lJQ ::s ~ g e! N S. t'1l pto- ~ ! [~ lI> @ g G "'d ~ D ~ as- . (:l.-(") '" ... ,.;""'e.. -... ~ en' 0 rs 3 o ;Jill S" s~ 5 el = Er :: St-g ;:t ~ pto~'" G '" fr(") G G g S; ~ lI> l:: "Si a'8 0 e!:s~ ~~ ~ c ;:s .... ~ ?' ::l- g'g, l:: () ~ n ..... -. 0 [~ o <il Z. ~~ ~ t..; -. ..... 3"g - is'~ 0" 05 el G a l.l II: == ;:s ~ ~ ~. 0 '" G '" ~. l\i ~ (") G ::s ~ ~(\) cr G (") o::SlJQ ~ ~ ~. ~<J ~~ a ~. [ g,~o ~ ~ - G p,. e $:l -. ~~ 8- fr", a ~ . n~ St- """" ()~ ::s 3 G ~~ (\) :=:~ C': g' '" - ~ (") ~ S G G g }-e: (")'" ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ I:"e..e: .'" Sill'" s. II: ::! ::! ;;3 d6lJQ ~'Ill s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ::s '" ~ '" ~ (") 3 :51~ ~. 0 '" ..... l:: o _.0 I C is' ! ~ G ::s <: 3 '" i>i . rn ~.~ ~ ':'S() c ... ... <=0 fR ~ e: """0_ - "0' 0 _. C III . ::s '" <=0 ::! ~ ~ a" o;-~ 'I g-s- <<:;;3 ::! ,<Z ~ III 3 5.~a ~ ..... ~ :r ~ 8 ~ . g,::j ::s '" ~ "'!!lZ I;l:I <il ~ lJQ G ! E. pto"'dp,. gc..~ g,~ G fE G ?OotfJ ~ <il ,.; al '" ~~ ~s:: ~ fE 0 Iii _.: ~ <g -p,.a. !!l !.!'l el ~. ~ g := ~. G I;l:I t/} ~.~. ~ _!'l Sa G ~. pto ;so !;' g.0 '" ~ g pto !n'.:" I:" '" ~. '" [ ?<' J! ~i e: ::s 0 G 3 ~ ! ........, ~ fI' "'dG '" ;i p,..g 3 z ~g- 8 J'} t '" (l a ~ ~~[ () l~ ~. ~. l "'d '" 8 III ~ a ilrGo () $~ 0 '6:-0 e.. a: ~ 3 Sl g,a el ~~a ~ ~ ()O g-;;ltl:l~ g = ~ ~ ;>Z '< 13 51.'" s.'O (l 0 '~ g !i1 '0' = <ii o '" S' :3 8 13 8. ~ i ~. ~s. .()g" ~1a, I.~ tvo",st- ts:<>st- as: '0 !l E. '" o $>l <> ~~ ~. tv s.tl:l <;:;.' g 0 1ii a e. N' p,.!l '" 0 ~. ",' e: .-..1 ~ ~.~ ~ '0 ~. st-Ii" .".= p,.;:E"tI0 =-",0"" e:S: '<st- ~ (l '0 st- a, ~. 8 '" 0.9. 6 ~ ~ .BS1 ~g < Q.. """- Ii ~. ",,,, ~ $>l 8- 5 ~. =s (tl ~ 0 '0 ~~g>~ 0Cl = 8 a g-:;; NQ..g.Ol ~ .g !l ~ 8-~~ -.... ~~ ~":-'e.. ~ D ~. .... ~ '" 0 o ;l $>l S" [g- 6 I!l = ~. ~ ~. '" = ~ a-'" li"Q g-....8 ~(J 3-. ~ ",'0 is, ;;f~~ ... ~ ~ . 0 g~ ::l. ~ C ::! ~~ <t '" o (l ~ ;: ~ 0 p,.~ 13"5l ~~ ~ ,... -. ..., t-.; -.. S' ~8 I!l '" a ~ II: s~ ~ ~ en ~. ~ S- o ~ () ()",Jg ~~ ~~. er o = :: ~ ;:: ~ 6:r s,[:I: ~ ~ ::!. '" ~ l:l... Otj(J ~~ 8- (l--lp,. - ~ "''0 ~lf ~ ~q ~ 00 = '" '" ~~ <> 13 = S ~. !i1 '" '" 0 ~~ ~~ .... l.s: ()g= ~. s.~ if rEie: ;:: ~ s.'" S' II: ;: ;: .... ! ;;l 0Cl0Cl S. :E~ '0 ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 0 <> o jooo,O ~ j;l . = l '" ;: ~ - en ~ gO", ;: 9 [::I Ii" 8 E. . Ef: = ~ ...... "'~2: = 0Cl '" 1ii gQ..~ tl:l (l $>l st-"tI~ r ~o~ ~. 1a,o '" ~ p,. ~~ ~e.. (l~8l '" Ii" ~ 0 ;E -t'! ~ <'= -p,.it ~ ~ ::: ~ '" tl:l I!l ~. .... '" ;S.~ 0 n' S:O ~. sa '" '" . ii [ I);',:-l g} '" ~. ~ g'st- J" ~g: F<' -~ !" e: ~ = 0 g- , ~(i e ~:;--l ~ r 8 = p,.0'" () g- g-~~ q a- () ::: 60S S' "tI 'E.8~ !i" ~ ~~ [ e. ~"'~ ;l- Sl ~ ' :" o " o;l- ....,c. I!l ~ Ii" . '" = .~ ~ no g.>-ltl:l~ o i:l '" '" 5 '" ~ ~ = ct>Z '< 8 ....... <6 ~ ~ g ~ S' . -.'0 o Eo""' i:l 8 lH~ <6 1O >-l g e:8. no- c:>.OSs' '" ~ NO", '" 0 1.0 t~gg- '0"" a~ "8 =s ~ ~. _. N a' ~ ~~. ~ e: g 0 c:>."':: '" 0 00 er t:r g g.~ e: .-.J ~ '" '< '" '0 -. c:>.::;; '" 0 g.a o-i:l 5f~.g ~ e: _. ~g- .r> c:>. ~'" '" ~ g 0 ~. 8. a 0. 8' S' .0 _. ~i:l 5 ~. '" '" q =(jp~o '" ~ ::l _. .g~S':J '0 1O c:>. J5 = ~ g e- N p.. S. t"D g.- '" ~ 0- 8 (\) ~a '" '" ... e. '" e.e. ~ (:'.l...-(") ~ (J ~ '-'Eo ~ -.... ~ s ~ ~ 1O t;.i"O S- Sg- g e; ::s er ~ ~(j :t~ g.~r> >= a~ ~n '" '" 0 ~ '::'3 (\) ~ "5i;:'< 0 ~3~ ~~ ~ ~ .... ~ '" 0 ct>i:l ~ . ~ a~ ~ ~ 0 '" <6 s.g[ ~~ ~::=.:. "" c:>.= tl~ S' or> e;<6~ ~ ::: ;::.. ~~. S" ;: ... 0 r> '" n~i ~ ~it ~ '" n o a ~ .... . ~\J ~~ lr i:l '" 6l' ~ ~ l:l. ~ ct>c:>. <6 >-l '" n~ ~ ~ -. ~~ 8- "''0 = '" e: ~ "'~ l' o' r> 8 c:>. ~S (\) :::~ ~ ~ 5 -'i:l '" '" 0 ie: nr>i:l ~~ ~ '::'3 ~! g- ::re.::r ::: ~ ~ .'0 3 1O 0;' ..... r::: r =O<l '0 S' ~ ~ s. ~ III ~ ~ ~3 -.08 ~ '" ~ .... ::::: -.", o _. I C c; E. j;l . ~ ;S.8 ~ ~<'l ! ~ (tg. e: ~.~ ~ 1O '" '" ~ 0 -. c ~ .....51- ~ ~>-l . i:l ~ "'l ~ !! '< Z l>l S 0;", ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ 5.~~ (\) '" g ~ . "'"::; i:l 8 Eo J5 '" ~ g!!z tI:l <6 l>l g."'c:>. ","l"l 5. S,O '" ~ '" !"'o~ r ~~ ~ ~g. <6 ::;; ;il ~ '" 0 -. = ~ '" ~ -~~ e!.l"l <= e; -. ~ [~ '" tI:l ~ ~. g. g ~ S-O g. 55 -. g. f ~ '" . ~ g er- e;;'~ _. i:l J.l ~; e: ?< '" i:l S, '" .~ fIJ " ~ 8 ~ ~"';;' = " i:l c:>..g 8 z l[ 8 t &. g- g.~g () '" 8 Eo ~ &.~ [ '" 'E.. l>l () l ~~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ o ~- 5l s,2. e; l=il ~ Y' i:l '" c g ~ (;;' i'l .'" ::: .~ <":l q <":l Ii' ;l- ::: (;. [ fI' .....3- g,<2 c""~ ~g- . ",,""l "'g2 8",,~ ?OofIJ ~~ -. = !!.l"!I ii" _l"!I g.O r;;....~ ~;: <> !:! ~<> ,if ~ ~ 8,8 ~~ s,2, ~ ~ ~ ~ 5.'0 8 e:a co co 0 '0 ...., 51 o;! ... (;1 [g. ~. ;:. :;'Q.. '" e:o.. co ... " ""'a ~ o' '" ::; ~ ~ " Q.. o [. .g '" =-:a ~S g If ... co ?''O a o ...., S' ~ l!!.. - [ S If ;;' 3 2 .: l>> ~ if ::; ~ ~. ~ ~. co ::r ~ 8 a 5. a no o ::; ~:z (;1 ~ 5 '" '" g. n~ f.o _. IV ~ g e:.:-J '0 5. ~:;. " '" g 0 .0 -. Ii ~. ::t -. i:S'0 O<l ::; :;.- '" "" l!!..s- fS 3 S el frQ ~s, a", '" (;1 Q..::; $78 '" n ~ ::r ra.a fr'O ~ o' -.::; ~e: 5' '0 ~i -.", iil . It"., co ~ cr' '<;;' III 3 1Il 2 o .: (;1 l>> o 0 ""'0 is:: ~g '" o;! Sa co 5' 5:<" Vol . ~ ::; If "" f :;.;;,o;!~ ~ 3 s.~. co '" = 0 (") (") r:IJ _. o E..""'::; (;1 III ...,,,: ~~~~ ....-"'"., ~Q..";:r -",':", '0 ::; l>> " o ..... ___-. """. IJW ........ =t a a l!!.. ~. co S'!>::; ~ co '< co Q..:l:! "" 0 [~.g~ O<l':~n -. ::; ~ _. <: Q.. ..... '" '" ...." = ~ ~ 0 t::a~~ "'t::S (D 0 (D ~ Q..ot-3 8 ~ l!!.. '" . 0.. - (') :l:!"""~ o ...,_. ::; ::r::; :;. '" " (D ft 8 ""all9 S-(;1[ ~ ~ ~. Qg~ ::;lto;! ~Q..(;1 (;1;;,a 530 '" '" ::; n"o ::rE..::; a S' [. '0 III -.0" o _.n ::; <: 0 co -.3 e: S' '0 "t:S loot =: . - co o-r;r !3 g, ~ =. :;. a O<l '" co :;.""~ '" ~ Q.. (;1 :l:! '" ~ ~ Sl -Q..~ el _.!if co ;s.,,: "'" {ll ;::. '" -':;. ~ g :;. ::; 0 '" III ....,..., ad'", :;. '0 3 "'~g ~=t~ ~ '" 0 1:;0 0...,- ffi::rfr SA (D ::s ~ ~ !; ~ ~~ ~~ III II: .. i1l' ~ ~ ~ ~s: ~fi ~~ ... II: ~ s' a '" I ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ Son (\l ~ c ;:s l:: <':> .... -. to; -. Ei~ ;:s So 9:-(t) ~<J l:l -. <':>~ ~~ ~ ~ ;l! ;l! (\l (\l ;:s <':> .... l:: C is" ~<':> C ;l! ;l! ~ ~ ;:t~ ~.;:;o ~~ ~ n ~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~;! ~ ~ ;! ~ ~ ...... f ::: o!:! :; ~ So (\l . g ~ QS' st;;lt:Xl::;:: ~ a ~z ~ ~ ~.~. (il ~ " " '" 5' 5''0 g " o E..'""' 8 . 5 (il ~ ..., ~ s:[ ()g' !:l.o 0 8 . '" NO~st '" 0 ::r'" .j>,- st '0"'" ~? .j>,1tE.." g,~ '0 ~ ~ " - _. N ~. t:Xl <:::;" fij (;' g 0 ..... a f!?,. N' !:l.o ~. '" 0 ~ ~.~ a ~. ~ e:.-..l '0 _. !:l.o :E "CI 0 stB. a'~ 5~.g g: e: -. '<st ." " " !:l.o ::;:: " '" !!l. 0 ~. 8. a 0- E'S' .6~ ~~ f6 ~. "" ~ = ~ ~ 0 " fij ::l _. =a~~ '0 f>l !:l.o Ji: ~ '0 " 0 ..., ~ g e- N ~..... (tI o " st- 8 fij ~ ~ a ia " "CI ~ D ~ f!?,.f!?,. . p.. '-' (") '0 :E' E.. ~ =-:6" rs 0 S" '" 5 ~ o ;l ~ ~ g~ ~ -. ~ ~o ~ ~ " ~ " '" 1t() ~~8 'Ii; ~ n, ~ ~ ia-g 0 ~ ~ ~~ c ::s ~ ~ [/' ;:l. i~ ~ ~ ~. 2 n 0 1>' " o (il Z ~~ 0; -- ...., !:l.o~ a'El - ~ s~ S' $78 Ell " !!l. ~ It ::s ~ ~~. '" -. ~ ()"~ ~ Q [ S:on, ~ () o aUQ ~(') ~~ ~,,~ ~ ~ ~ - 6:~ " !:l.o" n~ ~ l:l -. ~~ 8- ......,- <':l~ ,,'0 CD (l) (;'" t'""Io' g a ~ ==-s n, it~ ~ ~ S _.~ " 0 ~ ~ ~ Ie: ()"~ ~ is' :::! ~ ~E..e: .'0 ~ '" -. :: ;: ;: ;;l ~i 5'~ ~ S. ~ ~ PI ~ ~ '0 " a '" ~ ~ ~ _. 0 " ... l:: 0"""00 I C is'' ! ;: -." iil ;::i. a a ill . ~ ~ ':S i:;' 1>'st e:"''O <':l -.- ~ C i>> '" " "t;SO 0 -. S ~ ~;;l . ~ [ 'I ;: '-3!Z ;: !!j", ff ~ a 0;;'" ~ ...... = =-::12 ~.~~ 9 [=:3 ~ ~ i "'!!j2 t:Xl " fij gQ..~ ~. o 0 ~;r~ ?OofIJ ""'0 (il~i;l ell ~::12 ~s: Iii <Jg 0 -. :c ~ -" ife:ia !!l e?.i"l <: ~ ~ Yi ~ ~. " t:Xl ~ ~.~. a;:: .. i"l Sa ~ S' st '- g:o 0 n' ~ '" 5' II [ -. .., ~ g ~ '" . ~ ?<' 00 J" ~; ~ ...., a;:: fI" " ~ fij"CI;;l a;:: , ~" " ~ !:l.o.g a J'l ,if g ~ st::;::" [I " " (") =t. 'E..a~ ~ [ "CI a;:: f!?,. .eJ"o (") $~ I I :-s 0 G ~ 0;lS: ~ >l g,B. ~ " . ,,~ r ~ '- g J.! ~ J'l (") q' (") " * ~ n' [ !Z' Z ~. ~ ~ ~ l;<S- " '< 2 CJ~ ~ ",,:j ",.,2 8s.!"J ?"o~ 8l~ !l.= a!"J g 1ll -0 2:~ '" - ~:r " !l1 ~" ~ [ l~ t~ ",2, g ~ ~ ~. 5,"0 a e:8. '" 0 '8~ :4g ~ . p..'" ~.a =:r r;o e: ~. '" 0 a'~ ~ p.. III a " <1> o a .g 0' ~.~ ~~ <1>"0 ~~ . 0 ...., S' ~ - 8- 0' ~ ;' l ~ ~ ~ tl:l g. l" ~ ~. ~ ::r- s' " o a [ (")0 g i:l t;'Z Cl 0 5 g <1> a- (")~ 19 -. N g 0 '" 0 e: .-..l "0 _. a-i:l '<Efo " <1> g 0 ,.c -. ~ ~. 5' o' 0<1 i:l Efo- <1> "tl e.e. ~ ~ 5 ~ p..(") <1> 0 t;'i:l a~ ag os< " '" g Q ~~ t'"'lo' -'i:l ie: 5'''0 0<10<1 "tlS -'<1> OJ . ~Efo '" <1> ~;' ~ 8 ~ <1> ~ ~ s'o o ~ff <i:l <1> tl:l 0'2 ~. :r ?< '" ~ i:l' ~ "tl ~ 0- ~ $g~! '" <1> '" 0 (') (') ~ "",. O=---i:l [-,..,,,, ~ <1> <: 08!:;: t'..,) 0- ('tl ;:r ""-"Efo ""/tE.<1> "0 i:l ~ " g. t:O <:::;." - :l e.-' FZ =:. _ ~ ~&1~&1 p..::;; "tl 0 ;;r~.g ~ 5. ::;::<1> CJS. ~ el (") -< - = ,""",0 <1><1><1>q ::s ~ '"'1 0 "0= a ~ ~ <1> 0 ,.., N 0.. s:- G ~~e.8 ? o..c2 "'. = ~....,p; i:l g' 5' ~~" "tlsg ~Cll 8'El ==- ~ ~ a (") <1> -. o a erg ~a~ Cl;'s 580 <1> <1> i:l (")"::r- - E.-. - ~ '" s _.~ "0 i:l g -.00 o _.'" i:l < ;:> r.t.:I -."t:S -"'- =. 0...... '?:.~ 00<1> = ...., i:l ::I. Efo FZ Jg <1> ~ Efo"tlp.. <1> g <1> Cl~6l ~p..~ ~ -',,: rn ;S. i:;z. ('tl ~. s:- ~ g Efo i:l 0 <1> ~ ....,,.., i:l "tl <1> p...g 8 ~::;::~ "0 l!l E. -i:l~ ~ <1> 0 I :-t 0 0....,6: 1;Jl:;, <1> . <1> i:l ~ S" ~ ~ ~ g~ :: ~ ~== ., S' ~ f') ~ l\ .... ~f} ==-:: ~ b:I ~ ., :::. == ~ S. ~ '"' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ := l~ (I> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (I> tJ ~ s.(J (I> 2 <:) ;:s ;: ~. 1:;"- S<Q., [s. -. (I> ~tJ l:l -. (')~ ~<Q., ~ ...., (I> (1)' Sf Sf ~ ~ ....1::: <:) is' ':=f, (') . <:) Sf Sf ~ ~ ;t~ ~.::t' ~~ 2 "" _ ~J ~ ~. ~Q ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =: - S'" ~ '" I ~ ~ no 5o;;3tt1~ () (l) o i:l g l?i ~z ~ s s.~. ~ CD ., (l) El 0 g ~ () () S' S'''' o E.--- :3 () S (l l'O .." ~ e:a. (l) a- "'- 0 S . III n~ NO (l) 50 ., 0 {.o .j:o.-()5o ~...., .j:o.go"'(l) o ~ '8i:l0l() ::I. ~. ttI <:~. ~ 5 ~. N ~. =t o C ~ 2 a~' El c "'-8 e: .....:1 ~ ~. ~ El ~. .,' '" ~. "'- ~ '1:1 0 50 go a-i:l ~~-8 ~ '< 50 e:e: () (l) "'- ~(l) ., () g 0 lI<>5 n S' ~. ~. a~' ..0 ~. ~ go q ~g f6 ~. =' (tl ~ 0 (l) ~ 5 ~. "'!!l.g>::J '0 ~ Fl "'- lI<> i:l '" (l) 0 (l) 8 S' 50- N "'- - s {[ <D '1:1 ~ ~ [(l) ;;p (j ~ as- . p.,_C') ~~~ ~ ~g ~ s o ; ~. SO 5 l?i i:l i:l :! ~ ~("') ;t ~ 5o(l)() (l) g- gon o ;- 0 !; ~ <Il ~ "Si :a ., 0 ~8~ g~ ~ ~ .... ~ ""0 (t>i:l . 0 s.(t> ~ t;S'~ r:i ~ ::I. ",-(l ~.gE. ~~ ~ S~ 0 ...., 05 l?i ~ ~. ~ r:: ~. ;::: ~ ~ ~. g> () (l) ngJg "' lS" ! ~<Il ! ~ Q :: ~ ~~ o_~ ~ ~ ~C") f!.l. 8 ~a.= n!;l: ~ l::l -. ~ ~~ go "0 a'-3=: <':l~ [ r:-< o' 5 S 8 ~~ <Il >= ~~ ~ ~ ~'i:l <D (l) 0 ~ ~ s ~~ n E.. i:l ~~ ~ ~! a ~. ~ ~ g- ."0 rl'Oe: s' r:: ::: Jgll<> s.., S. ~ l!J ~ ~ ;;3 '1:18 'S.oFl a '" ~ ... ~ ~ ~ o ~'8 I C is" ! =: s ~. <D i:l < i:3 . ., ~.s ~ ~ ':s S' g S50 e: 6'''0 ~ <':l C ~ ., (l) ~::s~ ~ ~ ~;;3 'I g~ Ii ~ 0;;[ ~ l'O S ~ .... C:r~ 5 ...., (l) - ., g . 50 i:l ~~- go 8 '" Jg (l) fit _ Q. >oj i:l ~~2 ~ ~ ;-- 5od'[ oQ.~ s'o (l) <D ?Clocn ~g, (l ~ (l) en i\R~ ~ ~~8l ~ _. == <D go !!!.l"l ~ <i:l -"'-it l?i ~. ~ ~ ~ <D ttI ., ;s.~ a:: s~ ~., . ..... -0 ~. o' 50 0 5' sc ., . ~ [ t;.~ ., ~. o i:l g. ~;; ::r ?< i:l S, (l) .'" e: ~ ~ fI' '" ~ ~'1:I(;l Z ~'" S i:l "'--8 s ,:r () g-~g j '" ~ 0 g- ("J l~ :a "'sE. ~. ~. '1:1 _ l'O a:: [ s- ~ (l) 0 ("J $~ I :"1 0 ~ ~ ~ 0;5: Il g,a iZl (l) . (l) i:l g ~ (l0 go>-3to~ o l:l '" ~ ~z ~ s e.~. ~ ~ a ~ [Ij 8 ~ @. er"O o E..""' (3 5 ~ a I>' >-3 ~ s:[ ~ g. Q..ClS . Q~ NO~go '" 0 t~ag- '8""' ~ .0 ::\.~ "0 l:l I>' '" o to <:~. ~ ~ ~. N ~. ::l: g 0 ~ a e.1;j' '" 0 ~. -l:l Q..~ l:l"-..j ~ ~ '" ~. . ~. . "0. er Q..~ "Co go~ ~go l:l"~o""' I>' a "0 go e:e: 8 ~ Q.. ~~ '" . 0CI5 (l 2"'" l:l 0 ~. 8~' !!l. ..0 ~. <: Q.. ~ ~ S' fi ~. <l> <l> ~ = ~"'1 0 ~ l:l 5 ~. .g~S':; g 8- '0 ~ OCI l:l I;j Q.. ~ S go- o a ~ "C (3~e.8 ;p D ~ .g <l> e.e. . c..Ce.. =:!3. ~ ~ :E' I>' so ~ ~ '" .... o ;l ~. ;t ~ ~o 5 e; l:l l:l :! s.g go<l>", g g- ft(l ('D ct g !:; ~ ~ l1> I:: 'Si pl'{j 0 ~3~ g~ c ::s ... ~ (Pi;, ~ I:: <'l ~ ~ a ~ ~ oae. ~=.:. Q..a S"O - ~~ ~ s..:a, 0 05 e;a!!l. ~ ::: ~~. ""' (l ~ J€' is'' ~ ~s. S' '" ~ ~ ~ ~ (l ~ -. l1> ~ lr o l:l 0 ~ ~ ~n ~~ ~[g ~iil: s. ~ l:l -. ~~ - ~"O a ;:;l 0 l1> <"l~ 8- II er 5 s g ~S ~ ::...:a, ~ ~ ~.~ <l> ~ ~~ ~ ~ s ie: (lag :!:! g- ~."O r~. e: S. ::: ~. S! S! ~ ~ ~i l:l '" S. ~ llj "S. 0 ~ a '" ~ ~ r ~ .. I:: ~ :: o _.~ I C i:l ~. ~ l:l <: 0 ;;l . '" ~. s ~ ~ ~ S' ~go e: 6'''0 ~ <"l C E.. '" ~ "t:St:i= ~ S! ~ ~;:;l . '" ~ '-s- I>' o;;~ S! g,< Z ~ I>' S ~ ..... ~:r=e g ""' <l> g - - '" 8 . go l:l . ...... g ~ c OCI ~ !it "'gZ Pi g-~8- gQ.~ ~ o Cl 9'OOtl) ""'0 a~9l C/O ~=e s' ~s: ~ ~ 0 ~. ::: !" -~ -Q..a- !!!.l"J ~ <: l:l e; ~. ~ lBl ~ to '" ;:S. ~ ~ s ~ <l> '" . '- g:o ~ S' go g i ~. '" . [;;..:o'l ~. o l:l go ~i ~ ?< l:l 0 ~ .'" ~ ~ =d >-3 .~ !" ~ :z: ~(6 l:l Q...g S t ~r 8 g- g-~8 ("l a. "0 8 E.. ~ as "C _ I>' ~ s' f ~ ~ Cl ("l ~~ 2- I :'" 0 ~ ~ 0;lS: ~ g,2. Sl ~ . <l> l:l '" Iii ~ ~ '- g Jl 3: 3: S") (') ~. (') ~ fI' :z: ~ i >l 3: i '-3- g,< 2 ii:r~ <<g- o Q.-l "'g2 ga.~ ~OtfJ ~~ !!!.l"l nil -0 So _..."!!J '" - ~:r " !! ~" ,if ~ g [6' $~ s,a ~ ~ ~ ~ ",."" '" (3 &:8. en en 0 '82 ~ _. 8-~ ~. ;;;: ~a e: _. en '" Ct' ~. ~ g '" ~ g Q.. o e. .g g - - -'- en 0 ~If ~.?J . 0 ~ o -. S' ~ a - 8- s - if r E. l>l o o if ::I Q;l ~. ~ '" ~. ~ e: 8 8 g. 2. (')0 g ::I (t>Z ~ ~ '" 8 '" g" 9... S 0 "" .. _. N g 8 e:o-..l "" S' ~~ '" '" g 0 ,Q -. ~ ~. ... -. -. 0 Jg ::I ~- '" "C as- ~ 8 !3 e! Q..(') '" 0 (t>::I a~ '" iil Q..::I 0'" '" '" '" (') ~.r Ir"" ~ o' -'::1 ~en :::e: =."" JgOQ "CS -.", ~e. en '" ~;;l l>l 8 ~ 2 '" 10 g,~ ~- '" Ir <::I '" Q;l S 2 en S' ;;r {ll . ~ ::I If "C l>l 0- ~ ~;;lQ;l~ ~ 8 s.~. ~ 8 iil s. oc::.-..= iil 10 "" ..: Q.. 0 3 ;:.. NO",~ .j>.-",~ .J>.lre..", "" ::I l>l '" S. Q;l <: &: :a2a~ en S' c; ::I ~ en '< en Q..:l'; "CO [~.g ~ OQ=~(') _.::1 a -. < Q.. d q '" '" '" =' ~ ""l 0 -. = as'"" "0 a 0 '" ~ 5- 8 (3 ~ a 8 . PoCe.. :!:. l>l o ""_. ::I ::r::l ~"'''' ~ (t g "Cs!!9 S-iil~ 8"0 l=- e! ~ ~. (')",Jg o :a ~ ~a;:r iil""i:l" 5 3 [ '" '" 0 (')"'::1 i:l"= alOe: = 1-0.00 "0 ::I l>l _. C1 ~ o _. 0 ::I < {ll -. a ::r ~.Iof;j -'0 - 1=' = e;;' 0;;'[ l'i -. '" S' ~::I OQ '" Ii>' Ifl8- ~ ~ 9l ~ '" 0 er edt en ;S. ..: -. VI ;::z. .. -. ~ ~ g ~ ::I 0 '" ~~"" Q...g 3 1f~8 "0 a e.. _ l>l I>> '" 0 '1 :"" 0 o - ;:;tl;1r ...Ct.I (D = ;;p t' :I :; ~ ~:I ~~ III ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~!S: ::r~ ~ I:I.:l {; ., ::::. a::: - s. a .. I ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ III ~ ~. ;::- ~ ~ ~ ~ := ~ ;::- ~ ~ D ~ ~g "' ~ c ::s ;:: ~. 0;-- S'<Q., 5...~ -. "' ~n l:l -. ~~ ~<Q., ~ ~ ;s ;s "' "' ::s ~ ... ~ c is'' '::!, ~ c ;s ;s ~ a. ~ :::! Ioo.J >.". ...:! ~ .-- ~. ~ ~ ~ 0 ~~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ !:! ~ ~ 51 S' ~ .... III ~ {l () q' () ~ ~ @l ~ '- g ~ il: (';. [ fI' '-3- @l '< 2: ~ ""~ . g,::j "'@l2: g~~ ?Oooo ~~ ~. = a~ l: 1ll :::0 ~..~ ~g: g (i If ~J 0-" ~~ g,2, I il: ~ o .., ~ ~ g " gJ a ",. '" ;::i :3 e:8. '" '" 0 ","'" o >-l ::.~ [~ ~i ...... ~. ... " '" a 2' S' ~g III 0. g g. o " .ga =S '" ~~ a~ '" 0 . :4 o ...., 8' ~ - [ s ~ ;;' ~ E. III ~ ~ ::s t:l:l S. ~ ~ ~. ~ [- 8 a S' 2. (")0 o ::s ~z ~ ~ 5 " " ~ (")~ i .0 ~. N ~ g e: .-..3 '" ~. a-::S ~~ g 0 ,0 ~. f6 ~. M ~. ......0 Jg ::s :;to- " '0 e:.e?. '" 0 o 8 S f:l ~Q ~::s a~ " ~ o.::s 0" " " " (") gJ i:l" ~! 1I cr ~fil se: ~. '" JgOCl 'Os ~. " ii1 . s-e- '" " $;;' III 8 '" " 8 a <l r.;:- s'o ~g. " 0. <"8 " t:l:l s~ '" . ~. 1'< ~ ::s ~ ~ o ~ fg~~ ("/} (I) = o' (') (") ("/} _. o=,-.,::s <l r.;:- >-l-.: o.osa.: NO-'" -,,"_WI'">. -""~E.g- '8~Ill" ~. t:C -<::;,.' a ~ e?. N' tf.l . _ (I) gJ ~ fil o.~'Oo i:l""o"'" III <l '" :;to 0. ~" qs. S el 0 ~ ~ d .~: =:; ~ ~ 0 J:::a~~ '" " 0 >-l NO'.... g " III a-;::i :3 ::s e?. " . p..-(") '--'E. ~ ~ III ::s i:l" S' :;to~" ~~g e:.....Q9 o (tl ~ 8"Sl E. f:l " a (") g JJ" o .... ::s " >-l ft'o.l'l a t-3"S 5 8 Sl " " 0 ("),,::s i:l"E.e: el III '" = _.~ '" ::s " ~. 0 " 01-0.0 fil :S. 8 e- ~. "e. "t:S' 0 1-0. . ::s ~ 0;;" ~. g: ~ ~l[ ~ ::;: " ~~81 ~e:~ '" ~.~. " ~.:;to ~g:;to ::s S, " [,8 g ~~8 "'aE. - III Ill" 0 ~ :"t 0 o >-lEi: i;Jl::>'" . ,,::s ;p S' ~ !1l ~ ~~ ~~ ~ t: ., S' ~ ~ ~ n~ f~ ~~ ~.t: ... s. ~ '" I ~ ~ ~ ...... l:l ~ ~ (\) .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~g (\) ~ c ~ ~ n. ~~ i:l~ [~ -. (\) ~ \J l:l -. n~ ~~ ~ ~ S! S! ~ ~ ..... ~ c is" ':Sn c S! S! ~ Q :! -..:J ~:::l ..... ~ ~ n ~~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ !:! ~ ~ ~ ~ ! SO ~ .... I ..... ~ ..s! S :: ~ ~ ;:. s~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ C 6 ~ L~ ~.S ~l: ~ 1 E: E: c "~ ~ c ;::! - ~ ~ E: E: ~ ~ "- .~ &~ .G- ~ - u~ ~ '- ..::] 'c>.s1 -~ '- ;::! ~ c ;::! ~ 8":: G- .- U ~ ~ .".". ~ ::: ~ ~ ~ ..:: 1 t--. ~ f"l I '" '" .S ~ :: .... ~t II:: '== ~e .... ~ ~ II:: -S! ~ ::~ ~ II:: lea ~ ~ le oS ~ .g~i "0 . <r o l; ~ OIFi-a "3~0 g~;9 80] o =- 01 f-o,+<= 000 ;9 s ~ ;9'- 0 .~.23 '" :>> .2: til ~""'- ~~~ 000 ]~;9 O:l 0 gp .I!l;9~ ='+< o 0 ~ ~.9- :.= Or;}"= Q..Ooool tf.l 8 :> = .- 0 80'6. al .13 j '" 01 :E=u = g u o 8 g [ij ~ 0 ~as~ OIl d 0 .= 0 u :g ~ til ~ c. 8 !2l"* =~=- 000 '-'-;9 = 0 :i~~ ::l .;> Q C''''t:S . is] [ij ~ 0) '0 "'t) N f-oo.l:le. ~~CI:S-' o J-l r.B d .0000 U i ].~ .s~2l1l '+<00-<= o=-~] l'/} ~ ~ Cd 52.13 .I!l N Ol 2 13 :.e:> lJ:l.o '-'OI=c. .s]:9~ -'" 0 0 N ~~o"'" :>> f-o 01 2l 13 '-' "3 0 '0 ~ ~ 1il '''''::l 8 ;"" Q) E: Q Q) ~lJ:lf-o;9 til ~ ~ .s = ~ . .;l .~ 2..9 IJ:l 0 =..2: ~! o'C; 01 2l ] ~ 8 01 ~E o '" ;9. ~ 0._ ~~ .;j iibll =.- 0....:1 .- 0 c."", lfiJ U ~ o '-' ,-,0 ~] 'EJ] o 0 ~] 8@ "*Ol =-.s - = gp o.t:: 'v.: ll) .- ::l .2: [ o 0 o '-' ;9;., =.r- '-:j ~ ~ o 0 N ._ ~~ -<= l;u S 8 o = ~ 2l z~ = 0 Ou as .~ = 8 8 :E ii .~ o ~ ~ '2 IJ:l .g S oS 5 ~ .s ..9 ] =a ~ ..s '+< o . -g~ ~] ;9 .23 .s~ = ~ o '-' '3 al ]j o .~ :a '-' :;:;;9 ~ .~ .'" ] ~~ ~ 0 '+<~ o '" ""';9 e c. .13 ~ ~ o '-' ~ ~ 1l'5 ~.8 ~1l ~ ~ ..c~ ~ = .!~ - 00 r.;'- o~ = !l lol.. == .- ~e ~ooC ~]~ !: 1 ~ ~..c~ f!i f~ 5 ~ :::! i z en 1 ~ ~ u ~ u c5 :::! :::! '" l! os: ~ li rg '" .~ ~ no &""''''::;: g = " " a " '< 8 S' '-. ~ ~ ;>Z ",,, 0 .... 0 ~ (") rn _. ~.'Q g <ii Ol:q= .... /li" ~ = a " 8 8..08::: s:[ " g- NO" '" 0 n.... tc:g& [0 '8 :::: "8 g -" $ll " ::I-el 'Q , _. t:J:l -< =: ~. N gj g g 0 aaa,:r c:>. ",' '" 0 ~ ~.~ ~ e: ,'" ~. 1r 'Q ~. c:>.:l:! "'0 &e: <7"= i:l""0"" e:el, '< & !. (l 'Q & " " qg. S ~ ~ en ~. g 0 e>g -< t:::l.o jooO. .J:> ~. "",,~ [[ r:: ;S. ::; (t1 '"'1 0 " '" ::l ~. r::a~~ ~ '0 g e. Jg = '0"0"'" N Q..e-~ " " &- ~ [5~ (j ~ o = " ", ~ 8 ... aa ~. ~S '" 0 :l:!' E. S' ~ :::t ~ t;;. & o 8 o ;l $ll s-g ~" [; = S' $I ~ &~" ~ ~ (l> !:: ,,~ " !3 0 ~ c ;:s .... ~ ~o " 0 ", i:l ~ ~. ~ . ::I- ;>1;, S-(l~ ~S! ~ 0; - ~ 0 0 a" ~~ i:S'<Q., ..., " (l 8 '0 e: ::: ~ ~. 8" c:>.= l!l ~ !a III l:: ;:s s- ! 0" .. S' !:l ~(l> " " CJ ~ 100"' ~ ~ ~~ " n =Jg ;:s ~(J o ... ('l ~ !:l., ~. [ 1;,"..... !:l -. ~~ [ " c:>. el " .... s- (':lq 1r'O (l ~ 0 ~!f (l> == ~<Q., ~ ~ = 8 i:l :lIii;:z S ~ o' 8 " 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.= n";' :! :!:! & Ie: i:l" E. ~. "lS ... ~ ~ " !3 $ll '" ... l:: ~. ~ ~ ~ .'0 ~'$ll ~ s. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i '0 i:l " ~ '" ~ ... !:: ~ =: 8 ~. 08 c lS'" " o ~'8 I '::s\") S- a ~." = < w ~ e!.:.. 00 -'''t:$ =:r"~. - ~ ~ ~ $ll " i:l" -. 0 _. '" " '!' :. ~ 0 ~...., "l ~ .....3- 0 00" ~ ~ ~ " !!l '< Z $ll 8 5 ..., a ~ ...~ = 1Il g . & '" !!l - '" ~ ~ Jg"S ' Q.... &"'c:>. "'!!lZ 5. gQ..~ o 0 " ~ " ?Oocn ~ ""0 (l~8l If E!l~ ~ ~c: ~ c:>. a- !t = -" !!l !!.I:':l < = l!l <':l:! [S ~. " '" Ct.l """0,.... :E ::: ~ ;. ~. ~ 5' & o.. f e- o = & 0 -.,:>l r = 0 " j 00 _ ~5 ~ S ~~ ::: r.n ~(i g c:>..g 8 ~ z ~[ i &::;:" t i:l'. " a n g i i ", 'Q 8 $ll ~ Q.o a 10"0 ::: ~ :-- 0 n ~~ ~ o - ~ ~ ~;l1r Sl e,a l!l , ,,= en c ! ~ J 3: ,~ ('l ~. ('l ~ 3: 5' 1 fIJ ::z: t 3: ~ Sl .....3- ~ '< 2: ~ "":l2 . 8.::j N~2 gQ.~ ?OOCI:I ~~ !!Cl'! is S'- _.,'OJ ~ - !i' ~(i ~f as" ~~ g,2. g ~ ~ ~ S'''Sl "8 Ef."", '" '" 0 '8"'" ::a.n ~ [. "'" ",' ~. a pt. ~. <> Ef.a '" ~. 2':3 ~8- ~ a. 8 ... e a ~g 0;' pt. r~ ao ?' ::a. o ...., Z' ~ - 8- s ~ ~ 8 = - l>l ~ f tI:l ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ 8 a s' Iii "'" no :3 ::I 1t'Z g ~ g g. Q~ So '0 . ~. IV g g Ef..-.J '0 ~. or::S '<pt. <> ... :3 0 .c ~. c: ;S. ... '" ::1. o' di: ::I pt.- ... "1:1 l>l I!!. -0 ~ e S !!l ftQ 1t'::s a~ ... Ci1 ""'::I O!< <> '" ~ Q ~~ r:-' o' ~'::I ii- ~i ~.... ill . (tpt. '" ... .r;;, l>l e ~ 8 ~ ~ s'o o iff <::I ... tI:l S 5 ~. :s' t< '" ~ ::s ~ "1:1 I!!. ~ pt.;;,tI:l::;:: ~ e 5.~. C/.l ('tl := 0 <> <> '" S' o =,.-.. Ci1 ~ -l <: ""'os~ tv 0 (tI j:J"'" ~E:<>pt. .a::-. (tI E. ('t) '0 "' l>l <> e. t:tl -<:=.' a 2 I!!. N' 00 _. _ (tI l>l ::I ... ::I :s 00 "<r:n ""':E "1:1 0 ... 0 ...., i' Ci1 '0 pt. "'" ::;::... qg. San <.: Q.. bf -. .........q ::s ~ 1-10 s::a~1-I; '0... -l ~ "",:a ... o ~ [~ . o.c 0 :E' E- o -l l>l 1:1 =" """. pt....::I ('t) ft 8 ;;;cedi: oCi1g s'O=- !!l ~ a n'" S' o S-CJQ ::I ... n 1t''''''::r Ci1 ;;'::1. "' e '" g ... :3 ng::r ::r';:::" -. a l>l '" S -'1>> '0 "' <> ~. 0 8 o ~.", ::I -< '" Ct.l '""'.~ ::r ~. - -. 0 -. '0 ::I '" o-~ o g 5'~!ii di: ... ~ pt."I:I"", ... g ... Ci1 ~ Sl ~ ... i1 ij" e: <: 00 ;S.;:J. ... f:!l. pt. ~:3pt. ::I 0 ... l>l ""'-l ::I "1:1... "",,g e .. 8 if~= ~d5'" ~"'o I ~ 0 0-lE: i;il::r... . ..."' ~ S" :! ~ ~ n~ ~ l\ ~'"' l\ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ n!;l: :=o~ ;; b:I ~ .... ::::. II:: ~ s. a '" I l>.> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III g ::! t;,je ~ ~ ;t ~ =: ~ III ('J ~ ~(J III ~ C ::l ;e ~. !:l'- l:i<Q., ~~ -. III ~ ('J l::l -. '"'~ ~<Q., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ;: c is'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ;:t~ ~.;:.o ..;o)~ a "" !'to. ~.J ~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ :: - S" ~ ...... Q~ st-""'.I:l:l~ '" ~ '" "'2 '" '< S ~.,--. g '" ~Z ~ 8 1;J S. f,l a a ~ o E.q ~ ~.~ 5 S a ~ 0 . """osst- = a '" go NO",st- e:8. t-" (j.... ~actl '" 0 :r S .0 '8 = III 0. .l!j"'" ~.I:l:l <:~. o ~ ~'N = 2 a", ::>~ g g !iJ' S' <r 1;J 8-", e: .-.3 ~ '" '< 0 """~;C...., ~ ~ ~ S' :r (l "0 g- .'" ~st- st-Ir 8.."'~(j " '" OQ 5 s ~. e:e: o 0 ~. """ q ;;;a '" " ~ <' ~ 0 (\) 0 ~ ~. ~~"'1...., <l> ~ ~ ~. ~f!l.8'..., \) .... 0 g fa. ~ = .0 "0 as? S ~ g 8- OQ = ~ ~ [8 ~ ~ ;t~ st-- ~g o [ '" "C 9 PoC e. S- 'Si aa ~ . III ~~ .... ~ .g '" o ; S' :: c ~ =-:$1. '" S = '" 8 Sl ~ ~ Q o I!l ;::t ~::.:. ~g [(j g-I= ~ S~ ~:: ~~ '" g- ~g, ~ai :: ~ ::- ;:s S. ~.l!j ~;: ~ ~<l> ~~ f!l.", S] III ~n . 0 '" a "oj S' ~ ::> I!l !:t. ~ """= '" = ~ N. ~~ S, Ofl (jgOQ I"l ~ ~~ fl (j 01t~ S. 8' g,,,,,"~ ~ "'" ~ i:.~ S? ~ :r ~ ..., ~~ <l> ~ ~ it! 0- ~. S g S '" ::0;: a """"0 Q b:I ~ ~ S! ~ ~ - '" ~. " '" ~ 8- t""'o '" " 0 ~ ., <l> l!l ~. 1;J (j E. = .... S ;:s ~ ! =: i.a: [Ille: ~ . ~ ......... S" I:) ~ ~ c s:::. ~.", ~"" = Pl g- ~i 'S. 0 8 I ~ ~ o ~. ~ .., ~ ~. '" 1;J ~.3 ~ ;! "'to. ~g. ::r -."t:S ~ -. 0 _ ~ "t:S ::s -. 'I ~ f,l '" o;;~ 0-..., III ~ S' 5 ...., g .....3- ~ . st- !it !!; '< 2: ~ 8 J1l Cll """:'IE g ~ E. g-g8- ~ l::i '" III "'!!;2: I:l:l s,o a ~ ~ 8Q.~ e. ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 OOofIJ 6: -e:a. . 3I:'IE ~ '" g I!l ;S.~ !l.= <" '" '" . '" ~ '" I:l:l '" ~. st- " e!.l"l 1:)2 el g st- ~ [S !!; ~. fa. S' 00", ~ a:: ?< '" = ...., >-l 9-.., ~ ~ ;C S i -'. ~ ..... ~ - """"0 ~ ~f e: st-~[ !l " S g- ~ !" II 8 is III Z g. ;;;' ~(lO ~ , . 0 [ 0" 0;6: n ~ ~ g ~ a:: ~~ . '" n ~ g,a " Sl * go '" ~ :E g Jl ~ J"l (") q' (") " ;!- is: i ~ ~ 2! ~ [~ ~~2 oQ.!'l ~o~ ~~ S': -!'l li ~ =0 s:..~ ii 4~ '9 ! 5 Q.s t~ s,B. Y' , f ~ "'" n ~ ~ III '" " S.,,=, C [.s. ~g, o '- ::1.0 ::s ~ S. r:>.~ ~. . g.'" r:>. a:B.. '" -. ~fll ~ S' " ::s g 8- o [ "g " =-:!a '" - r~ ::s " ?l'~ o ::I. o ...., S' a ~ 8- s g- ;;3 ~ po ~ s: g ~ ~. ~ ~. '" ::r [- 8 a S' a ~~ ::s It'Z g ~ g s nii ::r.... ~ .0 _. N g 0 e:.~ "=' _. a-::S 6g- o ]9- c: < " -. 5' S' 0<> ::s g-; I!'. 5- ~ 8 5 III li"n It'g a~ B..<l W~ li ",,=, r' o' -.::s ~e: s."=' 0<>0<> ~~ iil . ~g- ~..., I>> S !Ii " ~ E- o I>> ....,0 ~~ <9 " IJ:l ~ 5. ?<.~ ~ ::s g- ~ ~ g-;;3IJ:l~ '<:82" !Ii 8 S''o' o = l'J'j -. "'1 -".-.... = B..1>>;;3:E ~~~s: .j:o.s:ng. "=' " e. " o ::s I>> n S' t:tl -<~. !it 5. I!'. ~. ~615::S r:>. ~'" ::r~d':a, g.<l"='g. O<>c:~" _.::s el n ~ Ii" i:l .~: =(ti~o .e;.S':J lil r:>. a " c~g"~ . (:l. = ~ ~,:-,e. o ..., I>> = t:T """. " ::s g--8 ~~~ o .... ~ 8og=.. III <l a '" -. n",E! o a v'" =:s " '- ~r:>.g <l""~ ::s S ;:T g " ~ nno ::r c: =:s el po = _. a: "=' =:s '" -.0 III o _.n 5} :S,O a: f/l."g ,,=,0- . =_. 0-'" s:a,r ::sO g. a 0<> " '" - "g I>> if"::S <l~:; ~gSl III e:it < ~ ~: ~ ::s:a,g- ~d'~ r:>."" :;I g-~8 '2.8~ ~ " I:'" 0 o 0 t;fl;lff . ,,::s ~ ~ :: Q .. ~ g~ ~~ ~ I: ~ S' ;: ~ ~ g~ Q ;: ~~ s. E ;: ;:' '" '" I ~ 'l ~ l:l.. So (l) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:: ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ (l) D ~ Son (l) C ;:: C ;: ;:: n e;;-~ s~ [So -. (l) ~\) ~ -. n~ :=:~ ~ ::-i ~ ~ ~ (l) ... n ;:: .g,i:l .~ ! ~ ;:t.-...:'I ~.;::l ~-, ~ ~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~~ ~~ s.~ ~. ! ~ ~ ~ =: ~ is" ~ ~ =:~ bJ~ ~d';;l~ < . " " '" :l1 ~z Q."O S " 8-~ ii1 ~ ~ ~ g '0' " 3 c: ~. s-~ 8 8 "0 -= _ Ill~ g-~ (")r::r ~ l:l 0 . ::rl:l 6' 0 ~ .... ;fl~fg- (")0 ~ .0 if ~. IV g-;;l f g. o 0 ~.::3 '< s ::to ;;l(") " . ~ 8 C'l = ~ ~ "0 ~. E.---'" = ~~ [Ill;;lg, ~J 8 " t~~g- ,BS2 " r:: (") ~ r:: < "8 = 10 q n S;. ~ 5 ~. ~. t:tl <: '0 ~ a a 0 is' OQ = ....._1-+) ~ ~ ... ~- ~ iil ~ ;;l e: " ." Q.:l1 ." S l\) '" as- [~.g g ~ ~ D ~ I ~ S OQ5~E. S" ~ 5 I!l ~. 3 III :! ~(") a..~ It(") ~ It 5. ~ ':'-l =: l\) ~ .g. ~g, = ~ ~ ('".l -c: III '='> 0 ~~ N c ;:s ~~ 8- a" "0 .... 0 = ;:: '"' " ii1 N 8. sa q;; .... . ..... -. ~~ 0.; - ~ n Q.= " ~ r::r III := S~ Q. $1'8 ?Q.~E. ~ ~ ~~. " ~ [~ Q. ~ 9 :l1 ':-'~. ~ Q !3 ~: ~ -. l\) o ;l = ~ ~ ~(J ~~ s.:s = OQ l:l.. g ~"(") ~~ ~ l:l -. ~~ ,,"0 " i 0 '"'~ s- ~ o. Pf...8- ~~ l\) it~ ~.= (") ~ g- ie: ~~ ~ ~ '" ."0 ~ ~ Ql l\) ~ ~! " ~. Ii: $I $I ~ JgOQ I!l " ~ s. ~s (") ~ . ~ ., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o = ~ ....;:: ~ (") ~ JD =a"" I ~iS" ~ ;:: Ill' S'~ ~ '< ~ ~ e: ... >-l0 ~ . '"' ~ '" " " " = C r::r il s e: g ~ iZ " '<;;l 'I ~ Sl ~ S' "" . $I ~ ~~ '" III S (")C'l'" 8- '" " ::rE..~ ~ ...... " C'l Sill" . 0-'" o c: ~ a. l:5!ll~ a Er 5' 0 00-", .g g,o 'S.o,g ~ ?OOfLJ. ] o ....._ go ill~ W~ iil ;s.~. ~ ~ e: S. ~ !ll a;; ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ <"= 'P = " t\ " t:l-a. ... a:: -0 e: ~. f. 50'" 0 l'r 2:"'l '" . s: ~ ~ [ C'l 00 . 0 .'" ~;: = ?< '" Jg " Q. .~ 5". ~ ....."" '" <> '" 5f!81 z " <i r::r ~f a = ii1 ~ ::l. () ~ ~ 5 ~. g- ~ " ~ q 8.S" ." ~Q." () a:: s- '" 3: ~ 1;' ~ $"~ f '" ~. g- n ..... ::s * Sl !ll g OQ a,a =;. o 0 ~ = ....,,, ~~ n~ i'l~[~ <i " g ~ ~ ~_. " li'Z '" 5..... Q.E. g ~ ej g' O<l 9. S-e: ~i ~ a, ~ ~. ~~ g"ti;;iEt- ~ rC; .g 3 Et- nO 8-~~" -. Et- ~~ "r:l . _. N Et- a E. O. a, ~ 8 " l'l~' ;;in e: .-...1 "e.. ~ ~ ~ 3 0 "r:l -. ~ :;l5:'" ~ ~ g. <rl:l 6 ,,0 '<Et- " 1:1 ...., E.t::tl 8 " t;!l-'lt::tl~ .... !>> a ilSi1 St- ~ S. n ;::: ~ ~ ~. ""I:I~' ~ '< <> '" " 5 _. 8 E.";:l 0 - '0 ~ Q. O<l 1:1 l'l " ...., ~ C)> Et-- 2.~~;;i ... " "ti -<>3 ~ e: as- N~E." ~ D ~ '" tl:ll'le. ~ ,.. fS 3 '8 t::tl ~ l'l SO ~ g. 5 ej S = _. ~ ~(') a.~ ~n S' . (II = ~ ~ III ~ 1il !jl"1:I'<<> ~ e: li'g, '" "ti 0 ~~ o ;:s ~~ 8-~.g~ l:: ~ "r:l la" ~ "' ~::::. 8- 8.i'l ~~ ~ n o~ t:r"~g, ~ l:. ~ is'~ ~~. ~ g " ~5al'l ~ Q [ ~ ~~ Q. ~Q re. ~ ~ g. -. III 5' ;S ~ ':l')0CI ~ ~ ~(') ~~ la ~~ l:lla8n _. ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ g ~ (tI - 0 ~ t"" 0' "r:l Q. [g :~ III ::~ S" -. il ~ ~ C t:r" lll' ~ ~ ~ ie: a Q.' t::tl ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~! . ~ -'l a ~ ;: ~ s."r:l gir~ S' a::: " 0<l0<l s. .... ~ ~ ~ ~ a :E~ ~11i ~ '" ~ .... l:: ~ I S- o is'" ! ;: r;J . "ti Q. ~ 'S ~ 1tEt- ai'lo ~ 8 S" '" " o "5l 1:1 :: <r " ;: ~ gS- '< ;;i 3 f.l e: ,<2: !t ej " '" ~ ;: =::r:l!! '" l'l 3 n~g ~ ...... 9 &=l '" " 8- <> <> g ~ ~ o Q. 0 N!!l2: ~;;i3 gQ.~ :g ?Oooo a,o i'l ~ ~ go ~:l!! ~ ~g. 5 ~ ~ '" ~. = " ~ " E. ~ !!l !!l.l"l i' <1:1 nlO" ;0:: ~ ~ " t::tl -.= ~ rl:l~ ..... i!: ~o e: S"s 0'" 0 t '" "r:l ::r ~ '" . ~ rn';.rJ 8 -.1:1 ~- ?' '" o' 00' Q.. ,., ~. = """. ('tl ~ !" ,,~ ~ '" 0 i;l z ~" <r = e:=o s. "r:l -;; p t ,ir ~ . 0 ~ a ~. ...., (') 8 5 OEt-!ll ~ as ~ 5 " '" i!: S" -. (') ~~ . "ti '" a: ~ ~ ~ = " s' O<l " Sl Et-~O<l g,a 1=;' ej " 8 5' ::::~ ~~ 8.g,g-~ <ii ~ ~ ~z >g st- 0 ....,'-. (! 0 'tl 0 Coe. ~ ~ 'tl ~13 S' 5Co f 8 a ~. ~~ (')g" 6<1>;;;st- <:1'.... (')5 ~p ~:"'ost- !i '" ;;;l 0 . - " -. N st- Co -. ~ g g::t. '< ;:;l t:):l ~ ;:;l(') e: :-1 1Il 13 5 ijl ~ ~ 'tl _. ~ ~ .0 <:1'= <l>e.ijl"'" ~ " <:1' '<st- Co III ...... st- ~o 8 N 0"'" .~ il S2 t <1>(') ~ o 13 _. ~ ~. '8 S:~ ~ ~ " 0 5 _. s'= e....., ~ S' '0 !it t:):llll....., .... (JQ = 5 <: r e: g-; 8. ijl' ~ ~ '" ;;p I e!.s- if~'<e. ~ D ~ 1S 13 Co >g III S" ~ (JQ a 0 er 5 !!l _. 5 'tl .~ ~Q a..~ < ~ " e: Co(') Co 0 S; ~ ~ ~ ~ 'tl 0 = 8 = "5i~ <t'= ~~(b~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8. a~ ~ ~ (! ~[s>E. ... N. ~~ "" - Co Co= l3'~ 8. ??fl .., 0 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. !=l ~ ....-' [~ _. (') Co [~ ~ l:l [ ...~ " a l~ N. ~ '!i-(') ~ ~ ~~ ~~ -. oyo 0 = = Ql ill ~;il: ~ ~ l:l N. ~~ 'tl (':l~ 5 l' o' st-<:1' :~ ~ ir~ g- -'ijl <l>S-0 ~ ~ ~ ie: ~3!!l ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! .'tl ~ g- ~. ;: ~. ;: ~ l ~(JQ !!l .g ~ S. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ (')(!g ~ "" S' .... ;:: r.1 . o ~ e: I ~ S". ~ =: ~ g, = . ~ ~~ -'" ~ S' ~ 8. ill ~ ~ . (':l - ~ ....3- ~ ~...., ~ ;:;l8 'I ~ ~ ~ '" 2: III S ;: =""~ '" (')~.[ ~ 8.::! ~ '" g ~ ..... " " ::r' () -. Co ~ '" 3 a'" ~ '" ~ 2: ~ gQ.: ;;; 'S. S' ~ ~Or.ll ~ g,o ~S2~ ~ g> ~~ (') ?a ~ -. It :;. ~ ~ ~ -. = ~ !.l'l <'= . "'t:t' ~. Q.. ==- ~ [~ e: t:):l . 0 a:: 0=<1> i ",0 '" 5~ g-81 n' " '" . [ _. '"l . g, ~ 00 . g 1<'''' ,l" ~- (JQ st- '" .~ !'" " r s. ~ st-~ ~" <:1' (p "'t1 fa. ~ ,if a. = (! g g. (") ~ ~ ~ ~ g- l~~' q iUi 5 >g Co= (") a:: ~ ~ ~ .t~ g- ~ ~J $I s,a 1:;' !!l = g ~=;:: ~~ ~ ~o-=;:: '" '" ~ ~ tj'Z _. ~ '" -'" Q..= ~ ~ !l o' Er '0' - S'Q.. g S ~ ::; ~ S' - ~ ia,g-~ g-~ ~~ "C..., . - .... ::; 0 '" st- (10 8-~~ g- ti ..,9 _. N ~g st- 8 e. 0. ""(1 '" ",:=-. S 0 e:.--.J .., ~ 0 ~ .., _. _' 0 J:J ~ [8- a-::; ~ -Vi '8g- , ;l 9 0 o '" ...., ~ f Pfl""g'st- ::; 0 st-s .;; .t:l -. [ !; ;s. ~ n ~ 1-0' 5' 6' <>........~ ;:: S' ~ ::; 8 ~;;3 0 ~. .. st-- a~~~ e: '" "C ~ '" ~5- NQ..=3 ;p ~ 0- tg ;-8 ~ o 3 "8 txl<e. S- D ~ ~ 5 !l a e?. '" ~ ~ Ii" (1 5' _. cr 5' -. tj'o fil'iil'< ~ ~ :;.0 a.~ .., a~ "C<> ~ ~ ~ 8- " .. 8-~.g~ g~ ~ ~ .~~ Q..'" ~~ ;:- Q.. o~ [~~[ ~::::. ~ a ~ (1 !\ II: ~ s~ ;::a ~ _. ~ is' ~ fJ9. Ii" '" ~ ~ ;:: ~:;. ~ .... s:r <: .. . ;: o' g f S'Jg ~ ~ -. ~ ~ ::; ....0(1 l:l... ~ ~(j ~~ "'.., .... S' ~ o' .a aCTo g~ :;. l:l -. g- _. ::; e?.'" ~ ()~ ~~ ie: ~ 8-Yg. ;:, ;: ~ ~~ ~~ ~ .'" . ~..., a:: ~. ~ s.~ ~ Jg~ g ir a s. II: ~ ~~ s. ~ ~ .... ! & ....ftr ~ '" ire ~ ~ ~ ~ iil . I l!Illi. ..,. ;;! ~ ftst- "C Q.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e- '" '" 5-.g g S' ~S" ! ~ '" ~..., 8 '< Z ft 3 @ e: ~[~ '" s ~ '" I!l ~ ",' ;:: ~ ~ 8- ~ " (1[8 ~ ~~z o <> ~ .. e ~ .... OQ,[O!l .g '" ;- g 0 ~ ~o~ .., ia,o tj';;33 ~ a. fJl~ @ @3'E.. ~ <> ~e.. ::; 8 -. jij'= _. <> '" ~ -[O!l a '" Ii" ",e.~ ~ l~ " <::; (1"''' ~ .... e: " txl r 15'::; g ",' S:~ '" S's ofil' ~ ~ [ <> '" . 00 . 0 .., -. ~ ;:- is:: fI' ~g: a ?<' iil o' ~. Q.. .~ f ~(i a' ~ iil 0'" ,if a ::; ::r::;::!l ("l Ii ~._ 0 _. g- . o::a ~ 0 iil ....,'" ("l :f ~ g-~. a: ~~ S' ~ Sl st- f ::;."C g :a, a " ~ g . _. st-~~ .. CD ~ 5' :::::;: no ~S,S-::;: ;€ " o ::s fIl :E ~z o.'tI"" S- 0 >-i...... 8-~ ~ ~ " '" g ~. 6":: '" ::;: ~ ~ <W ~ c: . S-~ " If 6"i>>S- n... <1> <1> {.o ;:!l:""oET- nO' fIl :;2 0 " ~i . - '" S- 0. ~. ~. N " <1> " !:t. S, o 0 ~~ '< >-i ::s ~ ;;in ~ g C;I ~ S 0 '" ~. o ~ 51. 0 ::s g ~ ~ET- nlE-~"" >= 0. l>> ___ S- -sr:: '" <1> NO >-i " fOl g 0 $:ogo. ~. ..c ~. "8 -<1>~ Ii ~. It'" ~ l>> 5 ~. -.::s = sa, ~ 8' '0 aC;li>>>-i ~ OQ ::s fIl 51 <: <1> ... ~; ~ .a S ~ a: o.~ -~ ~ D ~ fIl as- =- ~ E- o ~~ 'tIl>> ~. ~ !3 S ~ 0 "","0 S' s.C':l ;:t ~ 5 l!l OQ""'= ~ <il ~'5 S- a: Itn ~ 1t~1 ~ ~ (\) ~ ~ '" ~o (")~ c ::: ~ ~ 8- a~ c: ~ ~ ;: '" '" l>> " .... ~. ~ !\ "" - ~ n 8..~ N !t ... ~'" s~ <1> 8' It ... 0. ~ ~~. 0'" o ~ _ . ~ t: ~ ::: S. 0. '" <1> . a" ::s ii5" ~ ~(\) ri" ~ 9 0. aOQ ~ ~\:l ~~ !a :Ecn ~ ~ l:l.. ~ ~. [{J'e o . 0 g ::s :;2/il niil: s. l:l ~. ~~ It", "'~ 0' r:-< o' S-,,=- :~ (\) ~ it~ ~ ~ " - sr:: ~ ~ ~.~ ~~l ~!;' ~ ~ ~=- ~. !:s 1Il S- ~. .... t: ~ ;; ;; ~. '" ~ ~ l ~i ~ .g l>> ~ s. S- ~ ~ n~g ~ .. ... ;: ~ :: ~. <1> o 1Il a: I c is'" OQ ;a .. 5,::S . ~ ~. ':'S S' ~ !ts- _fIl 8 ~ 8.. /il ~ fIl <1> ~ ~ ;; ~ * ~>-i ::s >-i '" ~ ~i3" ~ <1> 0 ~ ;; ""Z fIl l>> g s,g (\) ...... C::r~ 8- fIl " n~_ g. ~~.. '" '" ::r ~. . 0-'" o c: e E- fIl "'~z .g CiS'" 'E. S' [ ~ gQ..~ "5! S,o ?Ootl.:l o o::S ~ '" ~~ <1> ~e.. ~~. !it '" ;S. ~ C ~. " 0. g -. :c !a <8 'fIl !...~ <1> 1=' o' p.. ~ 00 1Il =- <1> C;I o ::s " i:: etl"J ~. O'a g-Sl fIl J o' :;.0 8 fIl S' . S, Il [ r;;'~ F1'fIl ~; 5:. ~ 0; ~ ~ ~ fI' ('1/ ~ ~" a" ('I> ""g~. z a. t 8 g. fl j ,if ~ ~ a g :EOQ (') l~ l!l 8 S' ~ fIl . .'tI i:: 0' S- ~e.- (') t~ ~ ~:~ .. ~ ~ *' Sil e,a ~. ... ::s = Jg =~ bl~ 8-a.g-::E ~ '" '" :l:l ~z "0 '" 8-~ go 0 >-3 '--. a ~ '" 't:l '" 0 't:l ::E S S' 8'0. g 8 - "'~ - ~ae.. . st-~ Qlf '" '" " '" I>> st- n8' ~ j5 gj:;Ost- _. st- JIl 0 ell ~ ~ ff e" 1~ -. N ~g ~ >-3 = N' ;;In e:,;-l ~ 8 ~ ~ S 0 't:l 5' 0'" .0 '" ~ ~ 8,e..!il'"" e..::r gg- I>>'-'st- f" ~ N >-3'" ~ = 0 ~O"'n o<l .0 -. ~ 0 S _. '" < "8 ff 8 q ! ell t;j" ;; -. 5'= '" 0 ~ S' '0 tlllO'"" .... O<l = !ii2<;;l ~ e: st-- ! _.!!? S '" '" "0 o.!il - '" ~ ~ <> !!?!!? '" () D [:l:l'< E. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" "0 I>> (JQ (2 0 _. S" ~ ~ 5 l!l -. 5 't:l = SI < ::E () 5toeJ a..~ e: o.n g 0. g !:; ~ ~ 't:l '" 0 ~~~\i ~ ~ 8- ~s, n~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ell P-@ ~[8>e: '=' l\ ~ ..... -. It ~~ 0.; -- ~ ~ $;'8 ;3!~~. l\ II:: ~ s~ e: o-cJg ~ Q" ;:s ~~. () l~ o.!!? ~ !:l.,5to f!l. :: -. ~ ~-n ~ ~ ~n ~~ -. 0':-"0 ~ 0 = = ;l ~ nii: 5to I:l -. 8' "''t:l st-",::r (':,~ ~~ ~ 0" ~~ ~ ~ g- -.= ::'ft~ ~~ s.~ Ie: 6-8~ ~~ gj ~. ~ ~ .'t:l ~ .g ! ...11:: ;:: ~ ..... ! 6 0<l0<l '=' S. ~ ~~ nag ~ '" S' ~ ~ ~ ~ g,S[. I ... l::: ~ ~ OJ . 'Rtr f!l. ftst- ~ ~ ! ~ ::r '" '" '" [I>> ~ '. g <> a () ~ g~ Z ft ~>-3 = >-3 () ~ ;:: ~ 8 '" 0 ~ if ~ '" I>> 8 s.g ~ ~ " - 8- ~ '" n/l- ~ ...... . c..-l o 8 't:r'" ..... ~ NgjZ .@l a lO 8 E. '" g(:l..~ 'S. 5' r ~ ?Oc~ 't:l a.o '" ~~ g i~ o !2 ~ ~ c ~ _. !~:8- -. = f!l. ~ :E I!?-~ '" <"= g ~ ::r '" tll . 0 ..... is: ;0 00' 8'2 0='" 0 n' () g-Sl 16 [ r;.i'~ '" _. .0 ::l. g -.= Y' ~g: ?< '" O<l ~'" is: '" 5'. ~ st- '" 1}l ~ z ~1ii g" ctl ~~" gg ,; :::to = a 8 ~. n lP 0 g- t~cJg ~. .!!l ~J !il ~ l!l 8 -. n is: 8' 0.= G ~ ~~ g- I ~: i ~ ~ ~ g,a _. .... = = O<l ~ ~ bJ~ ~ia,g.~ 1>-" 5 ~ t~ 1>-..,,"" g. 0 ..., '-. g-E. ~ g " 00 ~. 9. I>- 00 ~ = ('":)=: -Eig;g -. "" ('")/f ~ E.' ~" 6"1>>g. o 5 I.~ l=!l~Og. '""g. J";lo" g~ -", _. !'oJ g-Ctl ~~. ~ g g ('") '< ..., = N' ~~ e:,;-J '" ~ o:l ~ 00 -. i g E. 0 or= ::r ~g- c: = '"" i -"'g. !'oJ1>>...... g 0 to;;''' ,.Q -. o i3 ('") '" c: < '8 ff g q' ~ S' ell &ii' ::I -. -.::s c:: 0 .., J6' g ~o:li>>'"" e: '" g.- ~ E. e: g ~ ~ - ~ " .." Q..= -('1) e.e. =- (I.l ~ (') ;p >= Ul ~ 0 ~~.."E. D ~ S ~ .., 0 I>> S" ~ e: 0Cl C1i "t:S 1o?i. ~ 00 ~. [~;3 ~ ~CJ 8- li-('") ~ 3-. ~ ib'o " Ei = ... ~ III ~ a: a~ -6 ib'" '13 ~~ ~ o ;:s "5i~ " .., N fa. 101 ::: .... _. I>-g l:l8..S'E. ~~ ~ 1;;'::::':' 2 ~ '" 0'" p 8-~g. S<Q., a 8 " !\ lI: -. ~ l5" ~ ~~ ~~. 0 lr ~ = ~ _0<1 ;:: ~ ~ -. III 5 0':-"('") l:l.. ~ ~<J ~~ f = ;l ~ .... ~ "00 g~ ~ tl -. rc cS" g-,,::r (1:> ....~ ~~ -'ij! .."It~ I:l ;:: ~. ~<Q., 6 Ie: 5-30 ~~ ~ g.~ ~ .00 S' (1:> ~ 0<10<1 i a (I.l s. is :!! :!! ~. ! :E~ 00 0 ;:: ;::' I>> ('")<il= '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en ::r j;l . g, " -. , ... ::: Itg. = '" ~ ~ ~i:l It ~ 2: g ! ~ en '" " ~ . .... !'s- 8- ~..., is ..., 0 ~ ~ 0 "'z I>> ~ 'I :!! ~ ~ [~ " ~ i3 ~ en " ('") 00 :!! - c.'" '" '" r[~ ~ ~ ...... ~!lZ l ~ E. oo-l"J I>> oo!::J ~ 1;;- ~ ?Oo~ i ia,o _.::S :;:$ ~~ ~g. ~ ~!i>' ~ ~ !!!.l"J e: " li- e: ;s. ~ ~ en <= Uil 8 "t:S ~. 0. Sf: " o:l . 0 ;s' 0=" '" I g:o ~. 52 g-Sl Jl t;.i'''~ '" S' .0 ::I. ~;: or ?<"oo a ,",,'" .~ ~ " 'l! ~. ~ o;g-~ :z: '" " Q t'\) "'t1 1?OO' I ,if <il ~ g. () ~ <l 5 .... q g ~ g- if oe.~O<I () i c." .." l!l S' " ~~ =;. e. ~~- ;l- - ~ ~ e,E. ~. ~. ~ en l!l =gJ6 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.1 ITEM NO.2 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Jada Yonker, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $7,928,046.65. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008. Mike Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 12/27/2007 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 4,745,779.71 01/03/2008 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 154,309.51 01/10/2008 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 2,068,906.07 12/27/2007 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 492,529.75 01/10/2008 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 466,521.61 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01/22/2008 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 7,928,046.65 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 2,022,237.21 165 RDA LOWiMOD - 20% SET ASIDE 3,318,096.93 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 348,465.31 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 240.53 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE 19,111.51 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,614.59 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT 1,485.37 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 8,885.94 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 1,1 09,498.28 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 8,545.54 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,854.96 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 84,547.51 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 13,328.71 340 FACILITIES 19,305.92 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,500.59 472 CFD 01-2 HARVEST ON A&B DEBT SERVICE 1,909.84 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,63701 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 545.67 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,500.59 476 CFD 03-6 HARVEST ON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,500.59 477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 2,182.69 $ 6,968,995.29 001 GENERAL FUND $ 639,184.20 165 RDA LOWiMOD - 20% SET ASIDE 11,132.43 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 206,807.23 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 241.81 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE 1 0,466.98 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,530.64 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 1,310.36 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 608.42 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 5,823.15 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,545.45 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 56,548.26 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 7,578.63 340 FACILITIES 15,273.80 959,051.36 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 7,928,046.65 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 979 12127/2007 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 22,118.16 22,118.16 980 12127/2007 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 89,406.37 89,406.37 981 12127/2007 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 22,178.39 22,178.39 SOLUTION 982 12127/2007 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 123,093.57 123,093.57 RETIREMENT) 983 12127/2007 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA), OBRA - Project Retirement Payment 4,331.94 4,331.94 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 984 12120/2007 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE 41955 5th St:escrow RRI-2949371 3,300,000.00 3,300,000.00 COMPANY 121087 12127/2007 000733 ABBEY PARTY RENTS rental equip:public safety expo 323.75 323.75 121088 12127/2007 004765 ACTIVE NETWORK INC, THE Epson Thermal Rcpt Printers:IS 1,810.20 1,810.20 121089 12127/2007 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT rental equip:Old Town holiday 930.37 930.37 121090 12127/2007 011554 AMBER AIR CONDITIONING INC Res Imp Prgm: Morelli, Mary 2,743.00 2,743.00 121091 12127/2007 011531 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE CPR/PAD pgrm materials:paramedics 63.00 63.00 INC 121092 12127/2007 000101 APPLE ON E INC temp help ppe 12/8 Ortiz/Rodriguez 766.65 temp help ppe 12/8 McCormick, L. 319.41 temp help ppe 12/8 Hanson, B. 65.52 temp help ppe 12/8 Troupe, Michelle 61.43 temp help ppe 12/8 Yuhas, Renee 61.43 temp help ppe 12/8 Garcia, Angela 57.33 1,331.77 121093 12127/2007 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN mb: 04617210 Thurman, Dave 47.00 47.00 CALIF 121094 12127/2007 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS guardrail repairs:Pauba/Rbow Cyn Rd 2,230.00 2,230.00 INC 121095 12127/2007 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES Dui & Drug Screenings: Police 552.00 Dui & Drug Screenings: Police 390.22 942.22 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121096 12127/2007 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 253.56 PW patch truck materials 249.81 PW patch truck materials 156.06 659.43 121097 12127/2007 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE '08 CACE mbrshp:Parker, Marianne 75.00 '08 CACE mbrshp:Ching, Maria 75.00 '08 CACE mbrshp:Cole, Tom 75.00 '08 CACE mbrshp:Voshall, Jean 75.00 300.00 121098 12127/2007 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Support Payment Case # DF099118 25.00 25.00 121099 12127/2007 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE- Oct drug & alcohol analysis: Police 1,820.00 1,820.00 ACCTING 121100 12127/2007 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION '08 mbrshp:002219 Ruse, Phyllis 135.00 135.00 SOC 121101 12127/2007 000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY INC Sept-Nov claim adjuster svcs 857.50 857.50 121102 12127/2007 009539 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES Nov plan check svcs:fire prevention 3,830.45 3,830.45 INC 121103 12127/2007 004609 CINTAS DOCUMENT doc shredding svcs: City Hall 110.00 MANAGEMENT Dec doc shredding svc:PD Old Town 32.50 Dec doc shredding svc:PD Mall 24.00 Doc Shredding Svcs: CRC 22.50 189.00 121104 12127/2007 007854 CLARY, JOHN reimb: state paramedic liC#POO886 130.00 130.00 121105 12127/2007 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES Community Health Charities Payment 107.05 107.05 121106 12127/2007 004414 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN Oct Ldscp Insp Svc:Diaz Rd Realign 872.50 872.50 GROUP 121107 12127/2007 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL electrical supplies: TV Museum 87.77 87.77 DIST 121108 12127/2007 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE misc supplies: Fire Prevention 69.67 69.67 121109 12127/2007 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON plotter paper/supplies: GIS 1,398.60 1,398.60 COMPANY INC Page2 apChklst Final Check List Page: 3 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121110 12127/2007 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 2,050.03 INC Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint 1,637.39 Fuel for City vehicles:Planning/Code Enf 547.42 Fuel for City vehicles: B&S 508.25 Fuel for City vehicles: PW Lnd Dev 474.53 Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD 296.01 Fuel for City vehicles: PW lnd Dev 93.14 Fuel for City vehicles: PWTraffic 86.42 Fuel for City vehicles: PWCIP 67.90 Fuel for City vehicles: Police 39.70 5,800.79 121111 12127/2007 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Dec 95366-02 Diego Dr Ldscp 51.74 51.74 DIST 121112 12127/2007 003665 EXCEL TELECOMMUNICATIONS Nov 07 long distance phone svcs 53.58 53.58 121113 12127/2007 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TrTLE Mitchell property escrow:RRI-2911381 7,940.00 7,940.00 COMPANY 121114 12127/2007 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Payment Case # 452379267 75.00 75.00 121115 12127/2007 010326 G E 10NICS INC equip maintlrepair: Stn 73 52.00 equip maintlrepair: Stn 73 23.71 75.71 121116 12127/2007 003792 GRAINGER Misc Supplies: Children's Museum 47.23 47.23 121117 12127/2007 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS Video Prod Svcs:lnside Temecula 4 2,100.00 2,100.00 121118 12127/2007 005311 H20 CERTIFIED POOL WATER City pool c1ean-up:EOC conditions 1,700.00 1,700.00 SPCL. 121119 12127/2007 001135 HEALTH POINTE MEDICAL EMPLOYEE PHYSICALS: HR 45.00 45.00 GROUP INC 121120 12127/2007 002906 HEMET FENCE COMPANY Res Imp Prgm: Casteel, Maria G. 395.00 395.00 121121 12127/2007 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD Hp Compaq T5720 Base (10):ls 7,068.40 Hp 19" Lcd Flat Panel Monitors:ls 3,021.58 Procurve Switch: Info Sys 2,412.52 Hp 3 Yr Nbd Designjet Support:ls 2,158.00 14,660.50 121122 12127/2007 010879 HINMAN & CARMICHAEL LLP Nov Abc License Svc: Theater 344.69 344.69 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121123 12127/2007 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment 13,740.19 13,740.19 303355 121124 12127/2007 005076 IGLESIA BAUTISTA DEL VALLE refund:planning application 806.50 806.50 DE, TEMECULA 121125 12127/2007 005956 INSTITUTE OF '08 ITE mb 15613:Gonzalez,Jerry 267.00 267.00 TRANSPORTATION 121126 12127/2007 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING '08 ICSD mbrshp:Middlecamp,Tamra 50.00 50.00 121127 12127/2007 006924 INTL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL ASSOC. Trffc signal wkshp 1/16-17:Uribe,R 100.00 100.00 121128 12127/2007 000750 INTOXIMETERS INC DUI tester mouthpieces: Police 54.57 54.57 121129 12127/2007 010119 IRS-OIC Sup Pmt Offer # 1000497587 452379267 140.11 140.11 121130 12127/2007 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 105.00 105.00 121131 12127/2007 011323 J. E. CHAPMAN INC. Recognition Shirts: Info Sys 565.68 565.68 121132 12127/2007 007834 KMART bicycle purchases:spark of love 2,039.68 bicycle purchases:spark of love 1,079.11 3,118.79 121133 12127/2007 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC misc parts/supplies: Aquatics 288.D7 misc parts/supplies: Aquatics 246.06 misc parts/supplies: Aquatics 40.50 574.63 121134 12127/2007 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD instructor earnings 358.75 TCSD instructor earnings 281.75 TCSD instructor earnings 266.00 906.50 121135 12127/2007 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC medical supplies: paramedics 1,676.87 medical supplies: paramedics 797.00 2,473.87 121136 12127/2007 006897 LORY, SUSAN, J. TCSD instructor earnings 207.90 TCSD instructor earnings 192.50 TCSD instructor earnings 192.50 TCSD instructor earnings 192.50 TCSD instructor earnings 173.25 TCSD instructor earnings 173.25 TCSD instructor earnings 151.20 TCSD instructor earnings 141.75 TCSD instructor earnings 140.00 TCSD instructor earnings 94.50 1,659.35 Page:4 apChklst Final Check List Page: 5 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121137 12127/2007 004141 MAINTEX INC Custodial Supplies: Library F-13 842.D7 Custodial Supplies: IWTCM F-10 516.79 Custodial Supplies: City Hall 281.92 Custodial equip maintlrepair:TCSD 128.53 Custodial supplies: Park Sites 66.70 1,836.01 121138 12127/2007 007210 MIDORI GARDENS Irrigation repairs - Veterans Prk 242.37 Irrigation repairs - Veterans Prk 233.05 Irrigation repairs - Calle Aragon Stn 4 227.67 Irrigation repairs - Veterans Prk 201.05 Irrigation repairs - loma Linda Prk 123.27 1,027.41 121139 12127/2007 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS Aug 07 Prof Srvcs:French Vly Pkwy/I-15 70,352.50 Sep 07 Prof Srvcs:French Vly Pkwy/I-15 43,650.26 114,002.76 121140 12127/2007 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS EE Computer Purch Prgm :Gutierrez 1,780.62 1,780.62 DIV 121141 12127/2007 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs:B&S 59.95 59.95 121142 12127/2007 011606 ORANGE COAST Advertising:Eco dev 2,500.00 2,500.00 COMMUNICATIONS 121143 12127/2007 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PERS long Term Care Payment 305.56 305.56 PROGRAM 121144 12127/2007 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 283.93 283.93 121145 12127/2007 002185 POSTMASTER Wtr/Sprg 08 leisure Brochure postage 6,419.80 6,419.80 121146 12127/2007 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Nov floor matltowel rental/uniforms 1,361.98 Roor MatfTowel Rental Fy'07-'08: Ch -43.60 1,318.38 121147 12127/2007 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Nov 01-06-99000-14 Pujol st 6.97 6.97 121148 12127/2007 000271 RBF CONSULTING Oct prof svcs: 115/79 S interchange 3,003.91 3,003.91 121149 12127/2007 007122 REDHAWK COMMUNTIES, INC. reimb per devel agreement Section 3.1.6 3,093.00 3,093.00 121150 12127/2007 007122 REDHAWK COMMUNTIES, INC. reimb per devel agreement Section 3.1.6 2,750.00 2,750.00 PageS apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121151 12127/2007 006483 RICHARDS, TYREOSHA I. TCSD Instructor Earnings 252.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 245.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 84.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 73.50 654.50 121152 12127/2007 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR November 2007 parking citation 10,040.19 10,040.19 121153 12127/2007 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & Res Impr Prgm :Villa, Richard/Dolores 11.00 11.00 RECORDER 121154 12127/2007 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. Reimb:Sister City Trip:10/3G-11/09 74.05 74.05 121155 12127/2007 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD Instructor Earnings 822.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 789.60 1,612.10 121156 12127/2007 001942 S C SIGNS Nov 07 Public notice sign postings 1,105.00 Oct 07 Public notice sign postings 750.00 1,855.00 121157 12127/2007 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Payment Account # 581095025 12.50 12.50 121158 12127/2007 010803 SEAN MALEK ENGINEERING & Prgs pmt #6:R.C.Rd \l\lidening pw02-19 278,807.09 278,807.09 CONST 121159 12127/2007 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS 1217-12/13 security srvcs:stn 95 1,357.96 1,357.96 USA 121160 12127/2007 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL Support Payment: Payment 339.70 339.70 121161 12127/2007 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL Support Pmt LO File # 2007052618 100.00 100.00 121162 12127/2007 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz at the Merc 12/13/07 147.00 147.00 121163 12127/2007 000751 SKILLPATH INC wbsite dev 207472 1124-25:Thorson,T 1,195.00 1,195.00 121164 12127/2007 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Nov 2-02-351-4946 MPSC 988.08 Dec 2-28-331-4847 Pauba Rd 125.23 1,113.31 121165 12127/2007 011656 STANTON, KEVIN Refund: Cite 57912 Cite Dismissed 50.00 50.00 121166 12127/2007 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings 672.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 436.80 TCSD Instructor Earnings 235.20 1,344.00 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 12/2712007 10:58:12AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121167 12127/2007 010679 TEMECULA AUTO City vehicle repair & maintFire Prev 153.16 153.16 REPAIR/RADIATOR 121168 12127/2007 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER TV Chamber member appreciation 12/12 360.00 360.00 OF 121169 12127/2007 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY Oct 07 Bus. Imprv District Asmnts 55,113.33 55,113.33 CONVENTION & 121170 12127/2007 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM INC Refreshments:Docent Appreciation Event 541.25 541.25 121171 12127/2007 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith services:PrkslFOC B1dg 150.60 150.60 CENTR 121172 12127/2007 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TCSD Instructor Earnings 54.60 54.60 TAEKWONDO 121173 12127/2007 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Dec high speed internet Stn 92 63.66 63.66 121174 12127/2007 004145 TIME WARNER TELECOM Nov City phones general usage 1,034.54 1,034.54 121175 12127/2007 010013 TOP DAWG TERMrrE COMPANY pest control:OACfTCC office 1,800.00 1,800.00 INC 121176 12127/2007 007433 TOVEY SHULTZ CONSTRUCTION ReI. retention:Field Oper Ctr pvv03-06 700,801.86 INC Retention wlh for items not completed -100,000.00 600,801.86 121177 12127/2007 011659 ULlNE INC shipping protection supplies:T.Museum 309.90 309.90 121178 12127/2007 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 73.00 73.00 121179 12127/2007 011636 UPS FREIGHT City Clerk freight services 15.89 15.89 121180 12127/2007 004261 VERIZON Dec xxx-0073 general usage 249.33 Dec xxx-3143 PO Ovlnd Office 37.39 Dec xxx-8573 general usage 32.68 Dec xxx-5473 Moraga Rd 32.68 352.08 121181 12127/2007 010003 WALKER, TODD TCSD Instructor Earnings 205.80 205.80 121182 12127/2007 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC Nov tree trimming srvcs:citywide 7,322.00 7,322.00 Page:? apChkLst 12/2712007 10:58:12AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121183 12127/2007 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL Clean Cities Expo 216:SB,DU,PR,DW OF 120.00 120.00 121184 12127/2007 005869 YMCA Refund:MHSCP fees (exempted) 323.20 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 323.20 4,745,779.71 Page:8 apChkLst 12/2712007 10:58:12AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 104 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 4,745,779.71 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/0312008 2:39:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121185 01/03/2008 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT Equip Rental:Holiday Parade Event 650.13 650.13 121186 01/03/2008 008279 AMERICOMP IN FOSYSTEMS INC Osprey 230 Video Card:IS 404.06 Misc Computer Items: IS Library 258.60 Misc Computer Items: IS Library 161.63 824.29 121187 01/03/2008 003376 ARTS COUNCIL, THE Community cultural arts grant 10,000.00 10,000.00 121188 01/03/2008 011438 BAKER, BLYTHE EDEN TCSO Instructor Earnings 275.00 275.00 121189 01/03/2008 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS desilting pond maint:santiago/rancho 1,769.25 INC desilting pond maint:santiagolrancho 743.20 2,512.45 121190 01/03/2008 004176 BROADWING Oec-Jan long distance & internet svcs 750.46 750.46 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 121191 01/03/2008 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 228.64 228.64 121192 01/03/2008 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Jan Copier Leases: Citywide 4,744.84 4,744.84 INC 121193 01/03/2008 004609 CINTAS DOCUMENT Oec doc shredding svc:Library 32.50 32.50 MANAGEMENT 121194 01/03/2008 006303 CONDUrT NETWORKS, INC MS Powerpt Trn: City Hall EE 2,160.00 2,160.00 121195 01/03/2008 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Jan Lease pmt: PO storefront 2,556.79 2,556.79 121196 01/03/2008 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON Plotter Ink and Paper:GIS 1,439.73 1,439.73 COMPANY INC 121197 01/03/2008 004417 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY rec supplies: Children's Museum 72.03 72.03 121198 01/03/2008 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK The Nutcracker Ballet 12/07:Theater 40,131.31 40,131.31 121199 01/03/2008 010493 FOREST CITY COMMERCIAL Jan lease pymtPO Mall Storefront 1,458.33 1,458.33 MGMT 121200 01/03/2008 003946 G T ENTERTAINMENT OJ svcs Bfast w/Santa 12/8:TCSO 250.00 250.00 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 01/0312008 2:39:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121201 01/03/2008 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC performance 1/5/08: Theater 6,000.00 6,000.00 SOCIETY 121202 01/03/2008 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC sttlmt: Candlelight Classics 12122107 1,128.00 1,128.00 SOCIETY 121203 01/03/2008 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: PW Maint 1,236.92 Hardware supplies: TCSD Parks 1,212.16 Hardware supplies: Ch Museum 248.68 2,697.76 121204 01/03/2008 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Dec copier maintlusage:Library 678.06 678.06 SOLUTIONS 121205 01/03/2008 010922 KITTENS 'N' PUPS K-9 Food & Supplies: Police 46.32 46.32 CORPORATION 121206 01/03/2008 010656 LEUSCHEN, AI DEE TCSD Instructor Earnings 210.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 210.00 420.00 121207 01/03/2008 000394 MAINTENANCE veh.inspect/brake sys review: 1/294 PW 240.00 240.00 SUPERINTENDENTS 121208 01/03/2008 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY temp help wle ACfTF 1,549.60 1,549.60 SERVICES 121209 01/03/2008 011179 MC MILLIN REDHAWK LLC TCSD Instructor Earnings 288.75 TCSD Instructor Earnings 131.25 TCSD Instructor Earnings 42.00 462.00 121210 01/03/2008 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS qty 1000 envelopes:b&s dept 160.02 160.02 121211 01/03/2008 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD Instructor Earnings 263.20 263.20 A. 121212 01/03/2008 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL Srvc Level C Election Srvcs Mar '08 10,987.23 10,987.23 121213 01/03/2008 010797 MUSSER, DAVID TCSD Instructor Earnings 126.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 42.00 168.00 121214 01/03/2008 010507 NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC Library access to online databases 150.00 150.00 121215 01/03/2008 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS Jan-Mar assn dues xx-20:f.v. interchg 469.35 469.35 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/0312008 2:39:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121216 01/03/2008 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle RepairlMaint Svcs 121.05 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 75.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 75.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 75.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 36.53 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVcs 34.27 416.85 121217 01/03/2008 011450 ORTIZ, ALFREDO ROLANDO theater performance 1/5/08 3,000.00 3,000.00 121218 01/03/2008 002185 POSTMASTER postage:Srvc Lvi C Election Ballots 5,766.58 5,766.58 121219 01/03/2008 003493 PRO-CRAFT Res ImplY Prgm: Montano, Cayetano 850.00 850.00 121220 01/03/2008 002612 RADIO SHACK INC misc equipment:Library 77.52 77.52 121221 01/03/2008 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & replace backflow device: presley s-13 642.00 PLUMBING backflowtesting/repair: mirada s-14 190.00 backflowtesting: vail rnch pkwy s-21 190.00 1,022.00 121222 01/03/2008 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various Water MetersfTCSD 13,621.96 Various Water Meters: Fire Stn 84 344.10 Dec 01-04-47210-0 TES Pool 321.37 Dec 01-23-01616-1 Crowne Hill 219.94 Dec 01-23-01625-2 Crowne Hill 139.72 Dec 01-04-10033-2 Marg Rd 56.12 14,703.21 121223 01/03/2008 011663 READY, MARC 1 yr TATEMS license:PW 297.00 297.00 121224 01/03/2008 002110 RENTAL SERVICE equip rental:PWmntc 16.85 CORPORATION equip rental:PW mntc 13.75 30.60 121225 01/03/2008 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO Nov radio rental & maint:police 1,685.88 1,685.88 TECHNOLOGY 121226 01/03/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT electric light parade patrol S1VCS 12/14 6,244.69 6,244.69 121227 01/03/2008 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz@Merc12/20& 12/27 871.50 871.50 121228 01/03/2008 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW Sign changes: 2007 Holiday Lights 43.34 43.34 121229 01/03/2008 000645 SMART & FINAL INC misc supplies:EOC/shelter operations 122.75 122.75 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/0312008 2:39:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121230 01/03/2008 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Dee 2-29-933-3831 FOC 1,255.79 Dee 2-20-817-9929 Police aT Stn 239.47 Dee 2-28-904-7706 various mtrs 173.97 Dee 2-29-657-2563 various mtrs 117.67 Dee 2-21-981-4720 Tem Pkwy 74.75 Dee 2-29-807-1382 Bus.Prk Dr/Diaz 40.31 Dee 2-27-371-8494 off-site storage 23.78 1,925.74 121231 01/03/2008 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Oct usage/City facilities 2,142.42 Dee 101 525 1560 6 Fire Stn 73 510.18 Dee 095 167 7907 2 Fire Stn 84 373.59 Dee 12958297843 FOC 267.91 3,294.10 121232 01/03/2008 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC rirshmnts:event review mtg 12/19 59.06 59.06 121233 01/03/2008 007900 SYERS, KATHI computer purchase prgm 1,181.01 1,181.01 121234 01/03/2008 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS mise rec supplies:mpsc 79.30 mise supplies:holiday lights tour 56.12 135.42 121235 01/03/2008 005633 TEMECULA MIDDLE SCHOOL cancelled event 5/16/08 @ theater 712.00 712.00 121236 01/03/2008 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY recognition awards:4 csd staff 92.67 92.67 121237 01/03/2008 011664 TEMECULA UNITED METHODIST FY 07/08 Community Srvc Funding Award 2,500.00 2,500.00 CHRC 121238 01/03/2008 004118 TEMECULA VALLEY FY 07/08 Community Srvc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 GENEALOGICAL 121239 01/03/2008 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith services: Temeku Hills Park 85.00 85.00 CENTR 121240 01/03/2008 008379 THEATRE FOUNDATION, THE Gala 12/13/07 @ Theater 675.25 675.25 121241 01/03/2008 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Dee high speed internet mpsc 44.95 44.95 121242 01/03/2008 004145 TIME WARNER TELECOM Dee City phones general usage 1,030.03 1,030.03 121243 01/03/2008 003633 TOLL ROADS, THE Jul-Dec '07 toll road usage 78.30 78.30 121244 01/03/2008 009436 TOOKE, MICHAEL Reimb: ICC Certification 170.00 170.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 01/0312008 2:39:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121245 01/03/2008 001561 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC Dee paging/rental svcs 278.94 278.94 121246 01/03/2008 008517 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF 12/6/07-112/08 Rental:Main St Bridge 26.40 26.40 CA,INC 121247 01/03/2008 004261 VERIZON Dee xxx-0074 general usage 284.08 Dee xxx-3564 alann 65.34 Dee xxx-0714 PO Mall Alarm 34.80 Dee xxx-3984 M.Naggar 32.68 Dee xxx-6084 general usage 31.72 448.62 121248 01/03/2008 004789 VERIZON ONLINE Internet svcs/PD DSL 39.95 39.95 121249 01/03/2008 004864 VINEYARD OF THE NEWWINE- FY 07/08 Community Srvc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 121250 01/03/2008 007949 WESTERN ARTS ALLIANCE 1 yr membership dues:B.Beers 400.00 400.00 121251 01/03/2008 004774 WOODCREST UNIFORMS 1 Park Ranger VestlM.Clark 596.56 1 Park Ranger Vest/Po Jackson 596.56 1,193.12 121252 01/03/2008 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL computer purchase prgm 1,300.99 1,300.99 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 154,309.51 PageS apChkLst 01/0312008 2:39:25PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 68 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 154,309.51 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 985 01/10/2008 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM PERS Health Admin Cost Payment 77,504.31 Blue Shield HMO Payment 0.00 77,504.31 986 01/10/2008 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 21,194.46 21,194.46 987 01/10/2008 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 85,371.26 85,371.26 988 01/10/2008 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 23,136.00 23,136.00 SOLUTION 989 01/10/2008 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 122,323.87 122,323.87 RETIREMENT) 990 01/10/2008 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA), OBRA - Project Retirement Payment 2,769.30 2,769.30 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT 991 01/10/2008 000642 TEMECULA CITY FLEXIBLE Child Care Reimbursement Payment 9,969.75 9,969.75 121253 01/10/2008 003552 AFLAC AFLAC Cancer Payment 3,509.72 3,509.72 121254 01/10/2008 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS misc supplies:tcsd tiny tot pgrm 81.40 81.40 121255 01/10/2008 007186 AB MAILING SOLUTIONS Mid-Season Mailer: Theater 2,936.25 2,936.25 121256 01/10/2008 008552 ADKINS DESIGN CONSULTING artwork design:cultural arts pgrm 864.38 864.38 121257 01/10/2008 008698 ADVANCED APPLIED 79S prk/ride engineering design 3,210.00 3,210.00 ENGINEERING 121258 01/10/2008 001916 ALBERT A WEBB ASSOCIATES Nov cnslt svcs:Santa Marg EIR 15,074.00 Nov cnslt svcs:Santa Marg EIR 744.36 15,818.36 121259 01/10/2008 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano repair/maint: Theater 140.00 140.00 121260 01/10/2008 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT Rental equip: Holiday Parade 1,211.85 1,211.85 121261 01/10/2008 009767 AL TA LOMA CHARTER INC transportation:holiday light tour 12/12 520.16 520.16 121262 01/10/2008 004446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL Asce membrshp:A.Attar#206654 205.00 205.00 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121263 01/10/2008 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE Oct - Nov animal control services 26,000.00 VALLEYS Animal control svcs:Evacuation Ctr 16,384.41 42,384.41 121264 01/10/2008 000101 APPLE ON E INC Temp help PPE 12/8 & 15 Jimenez 131.04 131.04 121265 01/10/2008 004623 AQUA TECH ENTERPRISES Chlorine tablets:tes pool 841.15 841.15 121266 01/10/2008 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr svcs @ Mntc Fac 230.78 Bottled wtr svcs @ FOC 90.80 Bottled wtr svcs @ Library 67.41 Bottled wtr svcs: City Council 37.95 Bottled wtr svcs @ C. Museum 27.86 Bottled wtr svcs @ Skate Park 25.83 Bottled wtr svcs @ CRC 25.48 Bottled wtr svcs @ Theater 20.86 Bottled wtr svcs @ TV Museum 19.00 Bottled wtr svcs @ Chaparral Aquatics 13.19 Bottled wtr svcs @ PBSP 8.61 Bottled wtr svcs @ TCC 7.75 Bottled wtr svcs @ TES Pool 4.30 579.82 121267 01/10/2008 001445 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF FY 07/08 Comm Svc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 TEMECULA 121268 01/10/2008 004205 BALLET FOLKLORICO TCSD Instructor Earnings 332.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 315.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 280.00 927.50 121269 01/10/2008 011668 BANO, SARAH refund: Harveston rental 12/29 55.00 55.00 121270 01/10/2008 011448 BEARCOM OPERATING L.P. Radio rentals: Holiday Parade 552.20 552.20 121271 01/10/2008 002381 BEAUDOIN, LINDA Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121272 01/10/2008 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS Street maint:wheel chair ramp Wlf Crk Dr 6,730.00 6,730.00 INC 121273 01/10/2008 011492 BENSON, PAMELA JEAN TCSD instructor fee: Art Wrkshp 250.00 250.00 121274 01/10/2008 004040 BIG FOOT GRAPHICS TCSD instructor earnings 420.00 420.00 121275 01/10/2008 010576 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF FY 07/08 Comm Svc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121276 01/10/2008 005827 BRATTON, CAROL S. Refund: Business License fee 35.00 35.00 121277 01/10/2008 003222 BROCKMEIER, CAROL Retirement Medical Payment 690.26 690.26 121278 01/10/2008 009082 C B C TECHNICAL INC misc lighting/sound supplies:Theater 334.88 misc lighting/sound supplies:Theater 297.39 632.27 121279 01/10/2008 011688 CAA BOSSTER CLUB INC. Refund: Security Depst: CRC 150.00 150.00 121280 01/10/2008 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 529.16 PW patch truck materials 196.32 PW patch truck materials 129.74 855.22 121281 01/10/2008 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Distressed Properties Sem:1124:Cole 65.00 65.00 121282 01/10/2008 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Support Payment Case # DF099118 25.00 25.00 121283 01/10/2008 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Fire Stn # 92 Copier Lease 182.55 182.55 INC 121284 01/10/2008 011542 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT misc equip:fire vol # 84 399.13 399.13 COMPANY 121285 01/10/2008 010434 CATERERS CAFE Refreshments:Breakfast w/Santa 3,238.14 3,238.14 121286 01/10/2008 003775 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL FY 07/08 Comm Svc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 121287 01/10/2008 003775 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL Refund: Security Depst: MPSC 150.00 150.00 121288 01/10/2008 011661 CHAPMAN APPLIANCE SERVICE dish washer repair:TCC 705.00 705.00 INC 121289 01/10/2008 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES Community Health Charities Payment 107.05 107.05 121290 01/10/2008 004414 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN Sept insp plan ck svcs: Planning 3,360.00 GROUP Billing adj: Sept insp pin ck svcs 2,370.00 billing adj: Sept insp pin ck svcs -600.00 5,130.00 121291 01/10/2008 009905 COMPRISE TECHNOLOGIES INC Smart Access Mgr (SAM) Software 6,248.00 3 mnths Bluesocket support:Library 712.50 6,960.50 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121292 01/10/2008 006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC Microsoft Pwrpt Tmg: City Hall EE 2,160.00 2,160.00 121293 01/10/2008 011669 CREWS, THERESA refund:creative bgns Alexander 25.00 25.00 121294 01/10/2008 011678 CROSSROADS CHURCH OF THE FY 07/08 Comm Service Funding 1,000.00 1,000.00 121295 01/10/2008 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL & Install:traffic monitoring cameras 4,770.00 4,770.00 DATA 121296 01/10/2008 003561 D F M ASSOCIATES Book: '08 CA Elections Code 155.16 155.16 121297 01/10/2008 004194 D L T SOLUTIONS INC Var. Sub scrip Renewals:AutoCAD 2008 2,206.01 2,206.01 121298 01/10/2008 001233 DANS FEED & SEED INC Hay & Straw bails:pw maint div 64.11 64.11 121299 01/10/2008 001393 DATA TICKET INC Nov Parking cittion processing svcs 3,129.70 3,129.70 121300 01/10/2008 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable restroom: Holiday Parade 1,411.10 SRVCS Portable restroom: RedhVV'k Prk 59.63 Portable restroom: Long Cyn Pk 59.63 Portable restroom: Veterans Pk 59.63 Portable restroom: Vail Rnch Pk 59.63 Portable restroom: Riverton Pk 59.63 1,709.25 121301 01/10/2008 000684 DIEHL EVANS & COMPANY LLP RDA Audit svcs: FY 06/07 2,900.00 2,900.00 121302 01/10/2008 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK Dec 07 special events premiums 637.70 637.70 121303 01/10/2008 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles:TCSD 1,632.67 INC Fuel for City vehicles:PW Mntc 1,404.76 Fuel for City vehicles:B&S 480.81 Fuel for City vehicles:PW/NPDES/CIP 394.48 Fuel for City vehicles:Code Enf 311.79 Fuel for City vehicles:Cashier's CkOut 234.55 Fuel for City vehicles:CIP 111.56 Fuel for City vehicles:CIP/City Van 106.68 Fuel for City vehicles:Police 34.51 4,711.81 121304 01/10/2008 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Dec 190304-02 Seraphina Rd 126.07 126.07 DIST Page:4 apChklst Final Check List Page: 5 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121305 01/10/2008 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Otrly luncheon:1/24/08:M. Edwards 40.00 40.00 CORP 121306 01/10/2008 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY Jan state lobbying svcs: CM 3,500.00 3,500.00 LLC 121307 01/10/2008 005692 ELMO, ANTHONY Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121308 01/10/2008 011670 ENLOW, NANCY refund: light tour 12/14 10.00 10.00 121309 01/10/2008 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC transportation:sister ciities pgrm 646.50 646.50 121310 01/10/2008 011203 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING Dec public restroom maintCitywide 5,102.00 5,102.00 121311 01/10/2008 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Mainline repairs:morrison homes 134.43 Mainline repairs:pavillion pointe 87.14 221.57 121312 01/10/2008 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 11/26-12/11 express mail svcs 270.85 270.85 121313 01/10/2008 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES RR RegistNlC Ann'l Conf:Roberts 455.00 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES JC Regist:NlC Ann'l Cf:3/8-12:WshgDC 420.00 CALIF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE GY '08 CA EE labor Posters 407.52 FALKNER WINERY GY Refreshments:Sister City Bdgt Mtg 357.13 COSTCO WHOLESALE GY Supplies:EE luncheon 12/6107 182.18 PA YPAL GR Bl Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 59.95 MARIE CALLENDER GY Refreshments:Union Mtg 42.01 1 ,923.79 RESTAURANT 25 121314 01/10/2008 007274 FORGE, THE Refreshments:EE Otrly luncheon 4,248.37 refreshments:evac vol recognition 3,339.71 7,588.08 121315 01/10/2008 010325 FORT DEARBORN LIFE Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment 996.90 996.90 121316 01/10/2008 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Payment Case # 452379267 75.00 75.00 121317 01/10/2008 007866 G C S SUPPLIES INC Computer printers toner/cartridge 1,066.47 1,066.47 121318 01/10/2008 004514 G T S I CORP Panasonic Docking Station: IS 2,474.16 2,474.16 PageS apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121319 01/10/2008 007964 GALLERY PORTRAITS refund:grading depst TR31344 lots 1-10 995.00 995.00 PARTNERS LLC 121320 01/10/2008 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies:Comm Svcs 774.20 INC Office Supplies:Planning/Code Enf 489.97 Office Supplies:Fire/paramedics 307.60 Office Supplies:Finance Dept 282.23 Office Supplies:B&S 193.64 Office Supplies:CRC 168.87 Office Supplies:GISlIS 152.19 Office Supplies:Theater 141.15 Office Supplies:MPSC 109.38 Office Supplies:T\I Museum 102.06 Office Supplies:HR 54.58 2,775.87 121321 01/10/2008 005947 GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT Express Mail Service:Fire Prey. 35.27 Express Mail Service:Fire Prey. 24.52 59.79 121322 01/10/2008 003792 GRAINGER maintlrepairs supplies: Stn 84 71.47 71.47 121323 01/10/2008 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED leisure activities brochures: TCSD 35,494.99 LITHOGRAPHY Mid Season Mailer: Theater 2,312.44 37,807.43 121324 01/10/2008 004552 H M S CONSTRUCTION INC Rei Retention:Trffc Signal RdhwklJffrsn 33,791.56 33,791.56 121325 01/10/2008 005311 H20 CERTIFIED POOL WATER Nov maint srvcs:CRC & tes pools 900.00 900.00 SPCL. 121326 01/10/2008 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: library 73.25 Hardware supplies: Fire Dept 1,258.44 Hardware supplies: Fire Dept 520.95 1,852.64 121327 01/10/2008 004188 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES Consulting srvcs:pavement rehab 11,550.00 11,550.00 121328 01/10/2008 001135 HEALTH POINTE MEDICAL Pre-employment Physicals: HR 25.00 25.00 GROUP INC 121329 01/10/2008 000963 HOGAN, DAVID Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121330 01/10/2008 011049 HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY FY 07/08 Comm Svc Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 121331 01/10/2008 007117 HOWE WELDING & FABRICATION Rei Retention:Ovrlnd Brdg Enhancement 17,099.84 17,099.84 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121332 01/10/2008 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT-PLAN I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment 12,513.31 12,513.31 303355 121333 01/10/2008 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT Nov copier maintlrepair: Citywide 3,414.46 3,414.46 SOLUTIONS 121334 01/10/2008 003571 INTL ASSN OF PLUMBING AND '07 Plum/Mech Code Sem:1/22-23 350.00 350.00 121335 01/10/2008 010119 IRS-OIC Sup Pmt Offer # 1000497587 452379267 140.11 140.11 121336 01/10/2008 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 420.00 TCSD instructor earnings 222.60 642.60 121337 01/10/2008 011671 JOHNSON, BETTY refund: holiday lights tour 16.00 16.00 121338 01/10/2008 011672 JONES, INGRID refund: holiday lights tour 24.00 24.00 121339 01/10/2008 010824 KARMAN L TO Misc repairs: Library 2,929.73 2,929.73 121340 01/10/2008 004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Equip repair & maint:pd radar gun 951.65 951.65 121341 01/10/2008 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC Dec Equip repair & maintcsd maint 193.06 193.06 121342 01/10/2008 011673 LAZO, RACQU EL refund: "The Cat in the Hat" 12.98 12.98 121343 01/10/2008 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES '08 League CA Cities mbrshp: City 22,172.00 22,172.00 121344 01/10/2008 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC Geotechnical dsgn: Civic Center 2,252.00 2,252.00 121345 01/10/2008 011680 LEISURE LIVING SUPERSTORE, Refund:Citations paid per Judge Knopf 305.23 305.23 INC 121346 01/10/2008 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Paramedic Medical Supplies 627.25 Paramedic Medical Supplies 72.20 699.45 121347 01/10/2008 002933 LINSCOTT LAW & GREENSPAN hospital traffic study rpt: Planning 7,073.00 7,073.00 121348 01/10/2008 009617 LOTUS MUSIC PRODUCTIONS, sttlmt Euge Groove 1/4/08 8,111.70 8,111.70 INC. 121349 01/10/2008 004141 MAINTEX INC Custodial Supplies: Theater 47.32 Custodial Supplies: FOC 27.75 75.07 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121350 01/10/2008 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY temp help wle 11/11 Fish, T. 250.32 250.32 SERVICES 121351 01/10/2008 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC 2000 TCC Presentation folders 2,006.22 2,006.22 121352 01/10/2008 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS bluegrass consulting srvcs:RDA 1,000.00 1,000.00 121353 01/10/2008 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MetLife Dental Insurance Payment 8,056.80 8,056.80 121354 01/10/2008 011440 MILLMORE'S WAA CREW city vehicle detailing srvcs:PW Depts 225.00 225.00 121355 01/10/2008 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS business cards:M Naggar/M Edwards 233.92 bus.cards:J.BeauchampfTCC (blank) 134.27 business cardsN Lara/M Dilullo 86.74 business cards:S Dakin 83.25 qty 500 envelopes:B&S Dept 58.49 596.67 121356 01/10/2008 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 11/5-1214/07 modular bldg rental:TCC 832.40 832.40 121357 01/10/2008 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING repair to chnl walls:Via Lobo Channel 33,368.00 repair to chnl walls:Via Lobo Channel 4,700.00 38,068.00 121358 01/10/2008 011676 MOORE, JAMES refund:HoIiday Lights Bus Tour 12/14 10.00 10.00 121359 01/10/2008 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS repair & maint facility:crc pool 413.68 413.68 121360 01/10/2008 000230 MUNIFINANCIAL Jan-Mar '08 assmnt eng srvcs:csd 5,715.62 5,715.62 121361 01/10/2008 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Jan "on-hold" phone music:City Fac's 131.72 131.72 121362 01/10/2008 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS Misc supplies:pw maint div 24.30 Misc supplies:pw maint div 24.03 Misc supplies:fire stn 84 13.13 Misc supplies:pw maint div 6.37 67.83 121363 01/10/2008 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 3/1/08-2/28/09 # 642 City mbrshp dues 6,439.00 6,439.00 121364 01/10/2008 005006 NBS GOVERNMENT FINANCE Spcl tax admin srvcs:Finance Dept 10,776.98 GROUP Consulting srvcs:cfd 88-12 5,000.00 15,776.98 Page:8 apChkLst 01/1012008 3:58:58PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121365 01/10/2008 004898 NEIGHBORHOOD HEAL THCARE FY 07/08 Community Srvc Funding Prgm 3,000.00 3,000.00 121366 01/10/2008 010504 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS Nov 26 - Dec 25,'07 cellular usage/equip 1,429.43 1,429.43 121367 01/10/2008 002037 NEXUS INTEGRATION SERVICES Network Client Services:I.S. 505.02 505.02 121368 01/10/2008 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Dec public ntc ads:Pln/City Clerk 1,008.62 1,008.62 121369 01/10/2008 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS Jan-Mar assn dues:F.V.lntchng xx17 345.45 345.45 121370 01/10/2008 010289 NUMARA SOFTWARE INC 10/21/07-10/20/08 supportfTrack-it:l.S. 4,079.68 4,079.68 121371 01/10/2008 009570 o C B REPROGRAPHICS dup. blueprints:Winchester Rd/B&S Dept 89.40 89.40 121372 01/10/2008 011679 OAK GROVE INSTITUTE FY 07/08 Community Srvcs Funding 2,000.00 2,000.00 FOUNDATION 121373 01/10/2008 002292 OASIS VENDING misc supplies:foc bldg 151.10 151.10 121374 01/10/2008 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS office supplies:Central Srvcs 149.08 DIV office supplies:Police mall stn 126.85 275.93 121375 01/10/2008 006721 OFFICEMAX - A BOISE COMPANY office supplies:finance 158.02 memory cards:police traffic div 151.60 309.62 Page:9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121376 01/10/2008 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle RepairlMaint Sves 696.14 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 454.92 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 238.04 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 178.84 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 140.39 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 135.09 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 135.09 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 135.09 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 91.25 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 77.37 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 77.37 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 77.37 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 77.37 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 75.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 64.60 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 34.27 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 34.27 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 34.27 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 34.27 City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVes 34.27 2,825.28 121377. 01/10/2008 001354 PC MAGAZINE 1 yr subseription:lnfo Sys 39.97 39.97 121378 01/10/2008 005152 PACIFIC PRODUCTS & SERVICES Sign Post Install & Repair:City Wide 5,785.94 5,785.94 121379 01/10/2008 010547 PARKS, RON Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121380 01/10/2008 011683 PARRY, WALTER T. refund:business license fee 35.00 35.00 121381 01/10/2008 002099 PASCOE MANAGEMENT LLP Jan restroom rental:old town 826.00 826.00 121382 01/10/2008 006117 PEONY CHINESE CUISINE refreshments:holiday parade 12/14 70.30 70.30 121383 01/10/2008 002331 PEP BOYS INC Mise supplies:pw maint div 74.93 74.93 121384 01/10/2008 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PERS Long Term Care Payment 305.56 305.56 PROGRAM 121385 01/10/2008 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS pool supplies & ehemieals:aquaties 1,353.87 1,353.87 INC 121386 01/10/2008 002185 POSTMASTER annual p.o. box fee #9033 1,100.00 1,100.00 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121387 01/10/2008 007771 PPSN CORPORATION refund:sec.depositlcrc 12121/07 150.00 150.00 121388 01/10/2008 005820 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC PrePaid Legal Services Payment 512.15 512.15 121389 01/10/2008 004529 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY- Dec repair & maint veh:P.D. motorcycles 6,060.22 6,060.22 DAVIDSON 121390 01/10/2008 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Various TCSD Water Meters 4,432.84 Various TCSD Water Meters 1,172.58 Various PWWater Meters 690.18 Various Fire Water Meters 402.34 Various RDA Water Meters 76.00 Dec 01-08-38009-0 Fire Stn 92 53.46 6,827.40 121391 01/10/2008 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN City veh repair & maintcode enforce 15.00 15.00 MERCURY 121392 01/10/2008 005849 READY SET GROW PRESCHOOL refund:sec.depositlcrc 12110/07 150.00 150.00 121393 01/10/2008 011684 REGALADO, SAN DY refund:business license fee 35.00 35.00 121394 01/10/2008 010087 RIGGS & RIGGS INC Apprasial sIYcs:Pech Pkwy ImplY ph II 4,500.00 4,500.00 121395 01/10/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Sept 13 - Oct 1 O:law enforcement 1,147,683.78 1,147,683.78 121396 01/10/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Bicycle Patrol 1/8-11/083 Deputies 657.00 657.00 121397 01/10/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT response trng 1/14-153 Deputies 552.00 552.00 121398 01/10/2008 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Tri.Collision Invst.1/28-211/08 N.Farley 151.00 151.00 121399 01/10/2008 011101 RIVERSIDE LAND Nov consulting sIYcs:Open Space 4,782.73 4,782.73 CONSERVANCY 121400 01/10/2008 011674 ROBINETT, LAURA refund: Journal of William T. Emerson 10.95 10.95 121401 01/10/2008 011685 ROBLEDO, VELMA B. refund:business license fee 35.00 35.00 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121402 01/10/2008 003001 ROSS FENCE INC. Res ImplY Prgm: Hurdato, Antonia 3,500.00 3,500.00 121403 01/10/2008 001942 S C SIGNS Dec public ntc sign postings: Pin 935.00 935.00 121404 01/10/2008 004598 S T KARCHITECTURE INC Noy dsgn:Wolf Creek Fire Stn 92 1,863.75 1 ,863.75 121405 01/10/2008 007582 SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION SafeGuard Vision Plan Payment 1,093.33 1,093.33 121406 01/10/2008 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Payment Account # 581095025 12.50 12.50 121407 01/10/2008 011686 SAPPINGTON, LEE refund:sec.depositltcc 12/17/07 150.00 150.00 121408 01/10/2008 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA TCSD Instructor Earnings 420.00 420.00 121409 01/10/2008 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS 12/21-27/07 security sIYcs:stn 95 1,452.16 USA 12/14-20/07 security sIYcs:stn 95 1,357.96 2,810.12 121410 01/10/2008 009568 SEW WHAT? INC. Banners:theater 1,859.76 1,859.76 121411 01/10/2008 011675 SHADY ACRE refund:Holiday Lights Bus Tour 12/14 9.00 9.00 121412 01/10/2008 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL Support Payment 100.00 100.00 121413 01/10/2008 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - CENTRAL Support Pmt LO File # 2007053052 36.96 36.96 121414 01/10/2008 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz @ the Merc 1/3/08 115.50 115.50 121415 01/10/2008 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW Signs:Ronald Reagan Sports Park 321.96 321.96 121416 01/10/2008 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC Noyeng sIYcs:main st bridge 2,634.00 2,634.00 121417 01/10/2008 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Misc rec supplies:mpsc 224.75 Misc rec supplies:high hopes 96.69 321.44 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121418 01/10/2008 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Jan 2-05-791-8807 various mtrs 8,008.59 Dee 2-28-629-0507 Library 5,847.52 Dee 2-00-397-5042 City Hall 5,424.38 Jan 2-27-805-3194 Theater 3,216.06 Dee 2-29-223-8607 Old Twn PED 2,266.72 Dee 2-00-397-5067 various mtrs 1,924.95 Dee 2-29-224-0173 Fire Stn 1,850.42 Dee 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac 1,228.80 Dee 2-29-295-3510 Waif Vlly 970.32 Jan 2-20-798-3248 C. Museum 880.86 Dee 2-18-937-3152 T .Museum 494.81 Dee 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chpl 82.28 Dee 2-29-458-7548 Wolf Crk PED 67.74 Dee 2-29-807-1093 Diaz Rd Irrigation 47.28 Dee 2-29-807-1226 Diaz Rd Irrigation 45.55 Dee 2-14-204-1615 Front st Rdio 41.67 Jan 2-29-974-7899 Ynez Rd LS-3 41.37 Jan 2-29-974-7568 Ynez Rd TC-1 39.81 Dee 2-29-953-8082 Wolf Valley 22.25 Dee 2-29-953-8249 Wolf Crk Dr PED 15.36 Dee 2-29-953-8447W1fVlly Rd PED 15.36 Dee 2-29-657-2332 Redwood Rd PED 15.36 32,547.46 121419 01/10/2008 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Dee 091-085-1632-0 T.E.S. Pool 3,445.76 3,445.76 121420 01/10/2008 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL Dee pest control services:City Fac's 583.00 INC pest control srvcsVillages/Corte 84.00 Dee pest control services:fire stn 73 48.00 Dee pest control services:fire stn 92 42.00 757.00 121421 01/10/2008 011639 SPORTS BOOSTERS INC Support ad:chaparral high sprts pgrm 200.00 200.00 121422 01/10/2008 005786 SPRINT Nov 26 - Dee 25,'07 cellular usage/equip 8,643.85 8,643.85 121423 01/10/2008 007762 STANDARD OF OREGON Mandatory Life Insurance Payment 11,276.75 11,276.75 121424 01/10/2008 008023 STATER BROTHERS MARKETS Mise goods & toys:spark of love pgrm 600.00 600.00 121425 01/10/2008 011687 STEPHENS, CHRISTINE refund:sec.depositlcrc 12/15/07 400.00 400.00 121426 01/10/2008 008373 SUN BEL T RENTALS INC Light Tower Rentals-'07 HaI.Parade 3,860.01 Light Tower Rentals-'07 Hol.Parade 2,345.88 6,205.89 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121427 01/10/2008 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS Misc toys:spark of love pgrm 1,301.56 Teen program supplies:csd rec pgrm 26.80 1,328.36 121428 01/10/2008 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 Union Dues Payment 5,199.00 5,199.00 121429 01/10/2008 010679 TEMECULA AUTO City vehicle repair/maint:Paramedics 188.81 188.81 REPAIR/RADIATOR 121430 01/10/2008 008292 TEMECULA DIESEL AUTO & truck repair:pw maintenance div 502.26 TRUCK truck repair:pw maintenance div 225.76 728.02 121431 01/10/2008 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL sunshine fnd/cntrpieces-brkfst w/Snta 523.45 523.45 121432 01/10/2008 010848 TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE Dec lease pmt:plants @ library 400.00 400.00 121433 01/10/2008 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPANY Proclamation Cert. Holders - Council 476.26 recognition plaqueslgavels:council 285.27 name badges:Naggar/EdwardslFox 25.70 name badge:McCracken 8.62 795.85 121434 01/10/2008 007340 TEMECULA VALLEY FIRE EQUIP. fire ext recharge: pw dept. 119.00 119.00 CO 121435 01/10/2008 011677 TEMECULA VALLEY PEOPLE FY 07/08 Community Srvcs Funding 5,000.00 5,000.00 121436 01/10/2008 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & plumbing supplies: crc 493.54 493.54 SUPPLY 121437 01/10/2008 003067 TEMECULA VALLEY R V SERVICE repair & maint:Police command post 667.40 667.40 121438 01/10/2008 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith services: theater 95.00 95.00 CENTR 121439 01/10/2008 011682 TEMECULA VL Y refund:sec.depositlmpsc 12129/07 150.00 150.00 ENTERTAINMENT AA 121440 01/10/2008 000316 THORNHILL, GARY Retirement Medical Payment 703.00 703.00 121441 01/10/2008 003862 THYSSENKRUPP Jan-Mar elevator maint inspectCty Facs 2,040.00 2,040.00 ELEVATOR.BRNCH 37 121442 01/10/2008 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Jan high speed internet City Hall 183.38 Dec high speed internet CW 54.95 238.33 Page:14 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 15 01/1012008 3:58:58PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 121443 01/10/2008 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Announcer: 2007 light parade 300.00 300.00 121444 01/10/2008 009912 U R S CORPORATION PE 11/9/07 eng srvcs:W.Bypass 4,755.13 4,755.13 121445 01/10/2008 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 73.00 73.00 121446 01/10/2008 009543 VAIL RANCH RESTORATION FY 07/08 Community Srvc Funding Prgm 1,000.00 1,000.00 ASSOCIA, (VARRA) 121447 01/10/2008 004261 VERIZON Dee xxx-5706 Field Ops Cntr 294.06 Dee xxx-3526 fire alarm 98.03 Dee xxx-2016 reverse 911 95.18 Dee xxx-9897 general usage 89.48 Dee xxx-5275 PO DSL 33.73 Dee xxx-7786 C. \/\/ashington 33.46 Dee xxx-5696 Sports Complex 32.68 Dee xxx-2676 general usage 32.68 709.30 121448 01/10/2008 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Dee access-(EQN) C. Mus.phone line 656.45 Dee access-(E05) CRC phone line 355.20 1,011.65 121449 01/10/2008 004789 VERIZON ONLINE Dee Internet svcs xx9647@ Library 439.95 439.95 121450 01/10/2008 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC custodial supplies: paloma del sol park 583.66 583.66 121451 01/10/2008 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES INC maint supplies: pw maintenance 769.83 769.83 121452 01/10/2008 011630 WOLFF LANG CHRISTOPHER Nov dsgn srvcs:Old Twn Gym Architect 850.80 850.80 (WLC) 121453 01/10/2008 007085 ZUNA, JOHN PAUL Reimb:ICC Certification 70.00 70.00 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 2,068,906.07 Page:15 apChkLst 01/1012008 3:58:58PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 16 208 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 2,068,906.07 Page:16 ITEM NO.3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Purchase and Installation Agreement with GM Business Interiors for the Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center - Phase II, Project No. PW03-06 PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works - CIP David McBride, Senior Engineer - CI P RECOM M ENDA TION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to a Purchase and Installation Agreement with GM Business Interiors, in the amount of $9,335.44 for the Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center and authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment. BACKGROUND: On August 28, 2007, City Council approved a Purchase and I nstallation Agreement with GM Business I nteriors, in the amount of $188,166.60 and authorized a modest contingency amount of $5,000 for workstations and furnishing within the Field Operation Center. To date Staff has authorized expenditure of $782.80 of the contingency for reconfiguration of the power supply to certain workstations. As we have occupied the facility over the last few months we have determined the need to purchase four additional tables, eleven additional file and storage cabinets, one additional workstation chair and to provide the labor to reconfigure a workstation into two workstations and to provide screening of certain specialized/sensitive work functions within the space available. GM Business Interiors has provided a quote of $9,335.44 for the aforementioned items and staff has reviewed their quote found it to cost effective. GM has performed very well on this and other City projects. FISCAL IMPACT: The Maintenance Facility/Field Operations Center project is funded through Capital Project Reserves, Development Impact Fees, and Community Facilities District funds. The total cost of the original Agreement is $193,166.60, which includes a contingency of $5,000 (2.7%). This First Amendment is for an amount not to exceed $9,335.44, for a total Agreement amount not to exceed $202,502.04. Adequate Funds are available within Account No. 210-165-742-5601 for the recommended actions. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND G/M BUSINESS INTERIORS FOR OFFICE FURNITURE PROJECT NO. PW03-06 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 22nd, 2008 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("Agency") and GM Business Interiors ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On August 28, 2007 the City and Contractor entered into that certain agreement entitled "Purchase and Installation Agreement Between the City of Temecula and G/M Business Interiors for Office Furniture Project NO. PW03-06 ("Agreement") in the amount of $188,166.60. B. The parties now desire to increase the payment for additional furnishings and reconfiguration of certain workstations in the amount of Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Five Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($9,335.44) and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 2 Purchase/Installation Price of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "The Purchase and Installation price which City agrees to pay to Contractor for additional office furniture and installation service is Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Five Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($9,335.44) for a total agreement amount of One Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand Five Hundred Two Dollars Four Cents (197,502.04). The Purchase price is final and shall be paid by the City to Contractor upon completion of the installation." 3. Section 3 Scope of Work of the Agreement is hereby amended by the additional purchase and installation of office furniture and reconfiguring of office workspaces as identified in attachment A. 4. "Exhibit "A" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full." 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. C\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869017.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT: G/M Business Interiors 1099 W. La Cadena Drive Riverside, CA 92501 (800) 686-6583 Phone (951) 684-0837 Fax Bill Easley, CFO Giang Nguyen, Account Manager (Two Signatures Required For Corporations) 2 C\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869017.doc ATTACHMENT "A" DESCRIPTION OF FURNITURE AND INSTALLATION / SCOPE OF WORK G/M Business Interiors Quotation 41730 (Dated 12/28/07) 3 C\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869017.doc GfM I ~~ ~.U.,~JrIlfff11J-J."". Ii.! (JU , ~)~ mn :!::J~f ' {>t ~ Quotation 41730 CITY OF TEMECULA ATTN ACCOUNTS PAYABLE POBOX 9033 TEMECULA CA 92589 CITY OF TEMECULA 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE POBOX 9033 TEMECULA CA 92589 GREG BUTLER Phone (951 )694-6411 Fax (951 )693-3929 GREG BUTLER Phone (951 )694-6411 Fax (951 )693-3929 I acknowledge that I have inspected color samples, fabrics and finishes specified for the products included in this order. I am satisfied that the products as specified are suitable for my intended purpose. I am aware that this is a custom order and is non-returnable. * Quotation is valid for 60 days * Approved by: Sianature Print Name Date Product Counts: Systems o Desk Units o Tables 4 Files 11 Chairs 1 Storage o Ancillary o Product Summary / Scope of Work ORDER FOR HERMAN MILLER STORAGE AND TABLES FOR MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ADD ON STORAGE, TABLES AND CHAIR SCOPE OF WORK 1) G/M TO RECEIVE AND INSPECT 2) G/M TO DELIVER AND INSTALL 3) PLEASE CONTACT GREG BUTLER BEFORE DELIVERY. 4) G/M TO RECONFIGURE EXISTING RECEPTION AREA ~; r:e] ::J~tcJ :::(ef~l =1 I ~ I =- ~""'I Qty. HERMAN MILLER LOT Delivery Method List List Ext Warehouse 17,359.00 17,359.00 Hot Rush Date Non-Tax Install Taxable Install .00 .00 Dsa'es Tax Exempt Sell Sell Ext Manufacturer Model # 7,735.91 7,735.91 (4) EA TABLE, SQUARE EDGE, RECT TOP 240 X nvv (4) EA STORAGE CASE 36W X 200 X 26-1/4H (5) EA LATERAL FILE 2-HIGH (1) EA MIRRA WORK CHAIR (2) EA LATERAL FILE 3-HIGH SEE ATTACHED BILL OF MATERIALS Freight Design Fee .00 .00 Account Executive: Giang Nguyen (gnguyen@gmbineV AMA Lindsay Waitschies (lw@gmbineV Project Designer: Page: 1 of 2 Fax: G/M Quotation # 41730 Model # Delivery Method List List Ext .00 .00 Hot Rush Date Non-Tax Install Taxable Install 1,000.00 .00 (ifsales Tax Exempt Manufacturer Qty. G/M SERVICES LOT RECONFIGURATION OF EXISTING RECEPTION AREA NEW FROM () .t1I)H : (rranMiller Product Subtotal: Systems Installation (Taxable) Freight (Taxable) Delivery and Install (Non-Taxable) G/M Design Services (Non-Taxable) Taxable Subtotal: Non-Taxable Subtotal: Sales Tax (7.750%) designed by Douglas Ball Total: ~:::t::l'J[~~"" Sell Sell Ext .00 .00 Freight Design Fee .00 .00 $7,735.91 $0.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $7,735.91 $1,000.00 $599.53 $9,335.44 Account Executive: Giang Nguyen (gnguyen@gmbineV AMA Lindsay Waitschies (lw@gmbineV Project Designer: Page: 2 of 2 Fax: ~ A ED 8 CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ADD ON Quote # 41730 Manufacturer: HERMAN MILLER PO# Sales Order # 12/27/2007 42647 PM Discount % STORAGE CABINETS Item Qty Prod u ct List Price Unit Extended Sell Price Unit Extended 4 DL221.2472L 1,375.00 5,500.00 481.25 1,925.00 65.00 % +Tbl Desk,Sq-Edge Rect,Lam 24D 72W Top/Edge Finish . DO . +desert Base Finish . 81 . +graphite Casters/G Iides . 87 . +glides Tag: 2 4 46-3620-29 778.00 3,112.00 381.22 1,524.88 51.00 % +Stg Case,Std Pull 36W 20D CaseHgt 26 1/4H Paint/Steel Type . TS . +smooth paint on textured steel Surface Finish . EH . +metallic bronze Interior . NS1 . +1 shelf total Lock/Doors . KA . +keyed alike, black Top . TL . +1 1/4"-high laminate top with vinyl edg Top Finish . DO . +desert Edge Finish . WN . +warm grey neutral Base Height . B2 . +1 1/2"-high base Tag: 3 5 26-3620-2 1 ,004.00 5,020.00 491.96 2,459.80 51.00 % +Lateral File Std Pull 2-High 36W 20D Paint/Steel Type . TS . +smooth paint on textured steel Surface Finish . EH . +metallic bronze Top . TL . +1 1/4"-high laminate top with vinyl edg Top Finish . DO . +desert Edge Finish . WN . +warm grey neutral Module Selection . N . +fixed front 11-3/4 Interior Selection . gp . +Front to Back Hanging Lock . KA . +keyed alike Module Selection tr2 . N . +fixed front 11-3/4 Interior Selection # . gp . +Front to Back Hanging Counterweight . CB . +counterweight Base Selection . B2 . +Base 1-1/2 in H Tag: Account Executive: Giang Nguyen AMA: Lindsay Waitschies Project Designer: Page: 1 ~ A ED 8 STORAGE CABINETS CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ADD ON Quote # 41730 Manufacturer: HERMAN MILLER PO# Sales Order # 12/27/2007 42647 PM Discount % Item Qty Prod u ct MR123AAM 1,131.00 1,131.00 554.19 +Wk Chr,Mirra,Std-Ht,Tlt Lim/Ang,Adj Arms/Seat,TriFlex Back Back Support Option . AJ . +adjustable lumbar support Base/Frame Finish . 81 . +graphite Casters/Glides . C7 . +2 1/2" caster, black yoke, hard floors Back Finish . 81 . +graphite Arm pad Finish . BK . +black AireWeave Suspensior . 3Q . +aireweave aireweave . 11 . +aireweave graphite Tag: 4 5 2 26-3620-3 +Lateral File Std Pull 3-High 36W 20D 51.00 % Paint/Steel Type Surface Finish Top Top Finish Edge Finish Module Selection Interior Selection Lock Module Selection tr2 Interior Selection # Module Selection #3 Interior Selection # Counterweight Base Selection Tag: ZLAB List Price Unit Extended Sell Price Unit Extended 554.19 51.00 % 1,298.00 2,596.00 636.02 1,272.04 . TS . EH . TL . DO . WN . E . gp . KA . E . gp . E . gp . CB . B2 . +smooth paint on textured steel . +metallic bronze . +1 1/4"-high laminate top with vinyl edg . +desert . +warm grey neutral . +fixed front 13-1/8 . +Front to Back Hanging . +keyed alike . +fixed front 13-1/8 . +Front to Back Hanging . +fixed front 13-1/8 . +Front to Back Hanging . +counterweight . +Base 1-1/2 in H 6 ZLAB1 .00 .00 % Desig n Charges . . Tag: ZLAB 7 ZLAB2 .00 .00 % Install Charges . . Tag: ZLAB Account Executive: Giang Nguyen AMA: Lindsay Waitschies Project Designer: Page: 2 ~ A ED STORAGE CABINETS 8 CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTENANCE FACILITIES ADD ON Quote # 41730 Manufacturer: HERMAN MILLER PO# Sales Order # 12/27/2007 42647 PM Discount % Item Qty List Price Unit Extended Sell Price Unit Extended ZLAB Prod u ct 8 ZLAB3 .00 .00 % other Charges . . Tag: ZLAB Product Subtotal: $7,735.91 Account Executive: Giang Nguyen AMA: Lindsay Waitschies Project Designer: Page: 3 ITEM NO.4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Approve the Sponsorship Request for the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run PREPARED BY: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run Sponsorship Agreement with P & R Foundation and authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a sponsorship request from P & R Foundation to provide city support costs in the amount up to $33,467 for the 2008 T emecula Spring Rod Run to be held on March 6 - 8, 2008. The event will serve as a fundraiser with approximately 65% of the net proceeds directed towards the Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County. The City of T emecula hosts a wide array of special events year-round all adding to its rich quality of life. Residents and visitors look forward to attending these popular events each year and the events help make Temecula the unique community that it is. The annual special events have proven to be very effective in getting exposure for Temecula both on a local and national level. The events increase tourism revenue for the City's restaurants, hotels, shopping centers and wineries. Due to the fact that the Rod Run promotes tourism in Temecula, the City support services would come from the General Fund's budget. There will be no commissions, consultant fees and/or salaries paid to any party from the City of Temecula's sponsorship. 2008 Temecula SprinQ Rod Run The 2008 T emecula Spring Rod Run will begin on Thursday, March 6th with a concert and auction to benefit The Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County at the Temecula Stampede. The Poker Run and evening car cruise will be held on Friday. On Saturday, the Show & Shine and the Awards Ceremony will be held. The 2008 Rod Run will primarily benefit The Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County as well as various charities in the Temecula area. The estimated attendance is projected to be between 55,000 to 60,000 people. There will be a cross section of approximately 650 classic cars, special interest vehicles, hot rods, and custom cars. No alcohol will be served or sold at this event. Promotion for the 2008 event will include newspaper, radio, television, magazine, posters and Internet sites (www.pnrevents.com and various car show web sites). In addition, the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau will promote the car show through a mailing to approximately 2,200 car owners. P & R Foundation will have a mailing directed to various Temecula businesses. 2007 Temecula Sprinq Rod Run To kick-off the 2007 Rod Run, a dinner and auction "Cruising for Kids" was held at South Coast Winery. The fundraiser benefited The Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County. George Barris received the Lifetime Achievement Award for his career in custom car building, and MovielTV Recording Star Bobby Sherman and World Class Drag Racer Tommy Ivo was on hand to sign autographs. There were 300 that attended the fundraiser. The 2007 Temecula Spring Rod Run served as a fundraiser providing over $22,350 to local nonprofit organizations including: Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County Temecula-area Boy Scouts United States Marine Corps Ball Fund Hi Hopes $15,000 + 5,000 1,600 750 Total $22,350 In addition, booth space was donated to various non profits and other organizations including Wishes for Children, California Highway Patrol, and others. The attendance at the 2007 Temecula Spring Rod Run was estimated between 55,000 to 60,000 people for the day and a half event. Approximately 650 registered cars and 60 vendors participated. There were 70 trophies awarded at the "Awards of Excellence" ceremony. P & R Foundation staged several activities to enhance the event. The Monkees Tribute Band, Day Dream Believers, performed at the Stampede. George Barris, one of the world's most famous car builders, brought the Monkee Mobile which was a big attraction. Alfred DeMiro, builder of a $2 million production car was in attendance and brought his Clenet. The 2007 Spring Rod Run was advertised through a mailing to approximately 2,000 car owners. Other advertising included newspaper, television, and radio ads. The event was also promoted via the Internet through various car show web sites as well as P & R Foundation's web site. Posters were displayed throughout Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: The city-support costs of $33,467 forthe 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run are included in the FY2007-08 Operating Budget of the various support departments. The Economic Development Subcommittee of the City Council (Council Member Roberts and Council Member Washington) has recommended approval of these amounts. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A - 2008 Sponsorship Package Attachment B - 2008 City Support Services and Estimated Costs Attachment C - 2008 Budget and Event Overview Attachment D - 2007 Temecula Spring Rod Run Recap Attachment E - 2008 Sponsorship Agreement/Model Conditions of Approval ATTACHMENT A CITY OF TEMECULA SPONSORED BENEFITS The City of Temecula's benefits as a Presenting Sponsor of the Temecula Spring Rod Run includes the following: · City log%r name will appear on all flyers, advertisements, poster, and event t- shirts . City name on all press releases · City of Temecula advertisement in the official program . 10 event t-shirts ATTACHMENT B 2008 Spring Temecula Rod Run City Support Services and Estimated Costs Below are the estimated City generated services and their costs provided to P & R Foundation for the "2008 Spring Temecula Rod Run." Staffing in various classifications is dependent upon event configuration and anticipated needs. Police Services Service costs: $16,517.00 Fire Services Service costs: $ 4,400.00 Public Works Service costs: $ 7,200.00 Community Services Service costs: $ 2,750.00 Code Enforcement: Service costs: $ 2.600.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED SERVICE COSTS: $33,467.00 p Budget for Fall Car Show 2005 ATTACHMENT C - Revised Spring Rod Run Mar 9 &10 2007 Revenue Budget Revised Final Car Registrations $ 12,000.00 $21,070.00 Sponsors / Calender $ 18,000.00 $18,200.00 Vendors $ 1,500.00 $1,750.00 T-shirt Sales $ 4,500.00 $4,700.00 Dinner $ 10,000.00 $10,620.00 Raffle / Silent auction $ 6,500.00 $12,300.00 Trophy Sponsors $ 3,400.00 $5,735.00 Total $ 55,900.00 $74,375.00 Expenses Calenders $ 8,000.00 $ 9,592.00 Dinner $ 5,500.00 $ 9,100.00 Flyers $ 400.00 $ 525.00 Final Dinner / Jackets $ 1,000.00 $ 763.00 Car mileage & Show Fees $ 500.00 $ 441.00 Awards $ 2,400.00 $ 1,800.00 Postage $ 200.00 $ 1,300.00 Rentals $ 1,200.00 $ 574.00 Phone $ 120.00 $ 221.00 Music/Entertainment $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Clean Up $ 1,300.00 $ 1,350.00 Insurance / permits $ 2,500.00 $ 3,733.00 Communications Equipment $ 100.00 $ T-shirts / hats / Souveniors $ 10,000.00 $ 13,111.00 Porta Potties $ 1,200.00 $ 1,300.00 Drifters Car Club $ 400.00 $ Supplies / misc $ 1,800.00 $ 4,001.00 Refreshments Meetings $ 200.00 $ 156.00 Advertising $ 680.00 $ 441.00 Registration Help $ 1,500.00 $ Health Department $ 425.00 $ 425.00 Posters $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Web maintemnance $ 220.00 $ 220.00 OJ $ 800.00 $ Permits Fee's City $ 300.00 $ 264.00 Total Expenses $ 44,745.00 $ 55,317.00 Revenue $ 55,900.00 $ 74,375.00 Net Revenue $ 11,155.00 $ 19,058.00 Contributions $ 10,000.00 $ 17,000.00 To P&R Foundation $ 1,155.00 $ 2,058.00 ATTACHMENT C .r&"":',;,sR""". . '",.J , . , . ... .. ',--_..'> .:.' -.,'; .;in"L'II~~".~ a-e~"" ~ 39252 Winchester Rd. #107-361 Murrieta, CA 925 Phone: (951) 303-9599 Fax (951 )303-9599 To: City of Temecula The 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run will have various media advertising to promote the 2008 Rod Run. This will include Newspaper, Radio, Television, Magazine, and Internet. We will be running ads in various news papers starting a month before the event. We will be making a couple appearances on TV27 to discuss the Rod Run. We will be promoting this event on our web site www.pnrevents.com as well as advertising on various car show calendar web sites. We will be running ads on the radio, we are about to sign with KFROG and will be doing radio advertising with Q103.3. The Temecula Visitors Bureau will be doing a mailing to approximately 2200 car owners and we will be doing a mailing to various Temecula Businesses. The other events for the Spring Rod is still in the planning stages and will give the City of Temecula updates as the planning concludes. Ray Waite President P & R Foundation . > ~ ~ . :, ~ :. ~ g N it & (; 1: ": ,t & ~ * @ , 1} ! $ ;; ATTACHMENT D 39252 Winchester Rd. #107-361 Murrieta, CA 925 Phone: (951) 303-9599 Fax (951)303-9599 To: City of Temecula The 2007 Temecula Spring Rod Run was a great success for all. The event started with a dinner and auction at the South Coast Winery in which we presented Mr. George Barris a Lifetime Achievement award for all his years of custom car building. Mr. Bobby Sherman and Mr. Tommy Ivo was also in attendance signing autographs. The event had 300 attend and was a great success and fun for all. We estimate the attendance at about 55,000 to 60,000 people and there were about 650 registered show cars. There was also 60 vendors and gave away 70 trophies. We had a Monkee tribute band playing all the Monkee'at the Stampede Mr. George Barris one of the worlds most famous car builders brought the Monkee Mobile in which was cruised up and down Old Town Front Street to please the crowds. We also had Mr. Alfred DeMiro builder of the $2 million production car was in attendance and brought his Clenet. Financials for the 2007 Spring Rod Run We are also pleased to say we gave a little more then $15,000 to the Boys and Girls Club (Check is included with the 2007 Fall donation for a total of $30,000). The Boy Scouts of America raised approx $5000 from parking cars. The United States Marine Corps Ball fund received $1600 to support the Marines returning and going to Iraq. We donated $750 to the show Hi Hopes when they came thru the City of Temecula. We also donated booth space to various non profits and other organizations including Wishes for Children, California Highway Patrol, and others Thank you for all your support, without it the event would not be a success. The event was advertised though a mailing to about 2000 car owners. We had newspaper advertising, TV, and radio ads. The event was also promoted via the internet through various car show web sites as well as P & R Foundations web site. There where posters distributed through out the City. Ray Waite President P & R Foundation ATTACHMENT D Revised Spring Rod Run Mar 9 &10 2007 Revenue Budget Revised Final Car Registrations $ 12,000.00 $21,070.00 Sponsors / Calender $ 18,000.00 $18,200.00 Vendors $ 1,500.00 $1,750.00 T-shirt Sales $ 4,500.00 $4,700.00 Dinner $ 10,000.00 $10,620.00 Raffle / Silent auction $ 6,500.00 $12,300.00 Trophy Sponsors $ 3,400.00 $5,735.00 Total $ 55,900.00 $74,375.00 Expenses Calenders $ 8,000.00 $ 9,592.00 Dinner $ 5,500.00 $ 9,100.00 Flyers $ 400.00 $ 525.00 Final Dinner / Jackets $ 1,000.00 $ 763.00 Car mileage & Show Fees $ 500.00 $ 441.00 Awards $ 2,400.00 $ 1,800.00 Postage $ 200.00 $ 1,300.00 Rentals $ 1,200.00 $ 574.00 Phone $ 120.00 $ 221.00 Music/Entertainment $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Clean Up $ 1,300.00 $ 1,350.00 Insurance / permits $ 2,500.00 $ 3,733.00 Communications Equipment $ 100.00 $ T-shirts / hats / Souveniors $ 10,000.00 $ 13,111.00 Porta Potties $ 1,200.00 $ 1,300.00 Drifters Car Club $ 400.00 $ Supplies / misc $ 1,800.00 $ 4,001.00 Refreshments Meetings $ 200.00 $ 156.00 Advertising $ 680.00 $ 441.00 Registration Help $ 1,500.00 $ Health Department $ 425.00 $ 425.00 Posters $ 2,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Web maintemnance $ 220.00 $ 220.00 DJ $ 800.00 $ Permits Fee's City $ 300.00 $ 264.00 Total Expenses $ 44,745.00 $ 55,317.00 Revenue $ 55,900.00 $ 74,375.00 Net Revenue $ 11,155.00 $ 19,058.00 Contributions $ 10,000.00 $ 17,000.00 To P&R Foundation $ 1,155.00 $ 2,058.00 ATTACHMENT E SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND P & R FOUNDATION This Agreement, is made and effective this 22nd day of January. 2008, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and P & R Foundation, a California non-profit corporation. In consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. P & R Foundation shall operate the "Temecula Spring Rod Run" on March 6 - 8, 2008. The "Temecula Spring Rod Run" will be a special event located in Old Town Temecula involving the display of approximately 650 classic cars, hot rods and custom cars along with related concessions and vendors ("Car Show"). The event will feature a concert and auction to benefit The Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County at the Temecula Stampede in Old Town. The Poker Run and evening Car Cruise will be held Friday, and a "Show & Shine" and awards ceremony will be held on Saturday, in Old Town. No alcohol will be served. The event is expected to draw between 55,000 - 60,000 people for the event. B. The City of Temecula desires to be a "Premier Sponsor" of the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: A. City shall provide the necessary City Public Works, Community Services, Code Enforcement, Fire and Police support services for the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run. The estimated City support costs are not to exceed $33,467. In the event that City support services exceeds $33,467, the sponsor may seek City authorization for payment above that amount. In exchange for the City of Temecula providing such support, the City shall be designated as "Premier Sponsor" of the "2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run." As a "Premier Sponsor," the City of Temecula shall receive the benefits as listed in Attachment A. B. The 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run will serve as a fundraiser with approximately 60% of the net proceeds directed towards The Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County. P & R Foundation will be reimbursed for their services in promoting this event and for operations. The Drifters Car Club will receive $400 for their assistance with parking, judging and vendor coordination. P & R Foundation shall also support other local service groups by seeking to include them in event activities to the extent reasonably practicable. The reimbursements to the non-profit organizations are subject to the financial success of the Rod Run. Within 30 days following the Car Show, P & R Foundation shall pay these funds. C. Within 60 days following the Car Show, P & R Foundation shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Car Show, its attendance, and describing the materials in which the City was listed as a "Premier Sponsor." The report should also include samples of media press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc. in a presentation notebook format. In addition, a complete financial statement to include a balance sheet and income statement of the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run must be provided along with a separate statement indicating the distribution of the funds. D. P & R Foundation shall file applications for Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit with the City of Temecula no later than sixty (60) days proceeding the first day of the Car Show. City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of conditions of approval. P & R Foundation shall comply with all conditions of approval of the permits. E. Once the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit applications have been submitted, the permits approved, the permit conditions agreed to in writing, and the event agreement has been executed in final form, P & R Foundation will receive City Support Services for the Car Show, as outlined in the agreement. F. P & R Foundation shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and their elected officials, officers, agents, and employees free and harmless from all claims for damage to persons or by reason of P & R Foundation's acts or omissions or those of P & R Foundation's employees, officers, agents, or invitees in connection with Car Show to the maximum extent allowed by law. G. P & R Foundation shall secure from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement a policy of comprehensive general liability in which the City of Temecula and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency is named insured or is named as an additional insured with the P & R Foundation and shall furnish a Certificate of Liability by the City. The applicable evidence of insurance shall be submitted to the City not less than thirty (30) days prior to the Car Show. P & R Foundation acknowledges and agrees that City may terminate this Agreement and revoke the Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit in the event that evidence of insurance complying with the requirements of this Section is not received on or before thirty (30) days prior to the Car Show. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in the policy or any subsequent endorsement attached hereto, the protection offered by the policy shall include; 1. Include the City, Temecula Community Services District, and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency as the insured or named as an additional insured covering all claims arising out of, or in connection with the Temecula Spring Rod Run. 2. Include the City, Temecula Community Services District, and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees and agents while acting within the scope of their duties under this Agreement against all claims arising out of, or in connection with the Temecula Spring Rod Run. 3. Provide the following minimum limits of insurance: (A) General Liability: Two million dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage with a $2,000,000 aggregate. (B) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 4. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its officer, officials, employees and volunteers for losses arising from the Temecula Spring Rod Run. 5. Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be cancelled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6. If insurance coverage is cancelled or, reduced in coverage or in limits P & R Foundation shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. 7. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects the City, its officers, officials and employees; or P & R Foundation shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claim administration and defense expenses. H. Should any litigation be commenced between the parties, hereto, concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party concerning the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees, in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled. I. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (iI) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Agency: CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Assistant City Manager Producer: P & R Foundation 39252 Winchester Rd., Suite 107-361 Murrieta, CA 92563-3610 J. P & R Foundation shall adhere to the Model Conditions of Approval, which are attached hereto as Attachment B, which incorporated herein, and as may be modified in the conditions of approval of the Temporary Use/Special Event Permit. Any violation of this document is subject to termination of this Sponsorship Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. DATED: P & R Foundation CITY OF TEMECULA Ray Waite 39252 Winchester Rd., Suite 107-361 Murrieta, CA 92563-3610 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney I I , I I I @ ~ I I I J; m ~ ATTACHMENT A SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS The City of Temecula's benefits as a Presenting Sponsor of the 2008 Temecula Spring Rod Run includes the following: . City log%r name will appear on all flyers, advertisements, poster, and event t-shirts . City name on all press releases · City of Temecula advertisement in the official program (subject to printing a program) . 10 event t-shirts I I I ! I I I I I I I ! I ATTACHMENT B MODEL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ,2008 Mr. Ray Waite P & R Foundation 39252 Winchester Rd., #107-361 Murrieta, CA 92563 Subject: Planning Application No. PA_-_ (Temporary Use Permit) for The Temecula Spring Car Show and Old Town Cruise to be held in Old Town Temecula on March 7,2008,1:30 PM to 8:30 PM and March 8, 2008, 5:00 AM - 4:30 PM. Dear Mr. Waite: Planning Application No. PA_-_ is hereby approved subject to the following conditions of approval: City of Temecula Planning Department 1. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application PA_- _ which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally C:\Documcnts and ScUings\Gloria. Wolnick\Local Settings\TcmporalY Internet Files\OLKD4\2008 model conclition.doc I concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency of instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the Applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate this Temporary Use Permit without further notice to the Applicant. 2. The applicant as the main sponsor of the Temecula Fall Car Show shall obtain insurance in the amounts set forth in the 2008 Sponsorship Agreement with The City of Temecula. The applicant shall also require that all participating food and non-food vendors identified on Exhibit C and the private security company used for this event provide evidence of general liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000. The certificates must show the City of Temecula, City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency and the applicant as additional insured. 3. All insurance certificates shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Temecula Finance Department no later than March 1,2008. 4. All food and non-food vendors who are approved to be located in the road right- of-way areas of the site plan for this event shall not set up prior to 5:00 AM on March 8, 2008. 5. All food and non-food vendors shall display a laminated authorization card provided by he applicant indicating the name of the vendor and space number. 6. This event is approved for March 7, 2008, from 1 :30 PM - 8:30 PM and March 8, 2008, 5:00 AM - 4:30 PM per the approved business plan, Exhibit B. The Conditions of Approval shall supersede the approved Business Plan where there is a conflict between the two documents. 7. All on-street car display parking within the event area shall be parallel in order to maintain required emergency access. 8. The event shall be developed per the approved site plan, Exhibit A. 9. Code Enforcement Officers shall be assigned to the event on March 7, 2008 and March 8, 2008. 10. Applicant shall obtain temporary electrical permits for any electrical provided for this event. Inspections of proper grounding of power generators and power cable installations are required and shall be scheduled 24 hours in advance. I I , t .~ I I ! I , I i ! ~ I ,t j; l' 2 t ,~ I I I ~ City of Temecula Building and Safety Department 11. An adequate amount of handicapped parking spaces shall be provided as indicated on the approved site plan, Exhibit A. Parking lots and spaces shall be clearly marked for handicapped use. C:\Doctlments and Scttings\Gloria.Wolnick\Loca! Scttings\Tcmporary Intcmct Files\OLKD4\2008 model condition.doc 2 12. Off-site signs are not allowed in the City of Temecula without authorization from all property owners and the Community Development Director/Deputy City Manager. Applicants shall obtain permits from the City of Temecula Planning Department for all approved sign locations. City of Temecula Public Works Department 13. The applicant shall submit a completed Special Event Package Application to the City of Temecula Public Works Department no later than January 14, 2008 (60 days prior to the event) with the $100 application fee. 14. All off-street parking shall be accessed through existing curb cut driveway approaches only. No entry shall be permitted over standard curbs. 15. All No Parking restrictions throughout the event must be adhered to. 16. No participant shall use, sell or distribute any self-adhesive stickers during this event. City of Temecula Fire Protection Bureau 17. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from the City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau dated _, 2008. Riverside County Health Department 18. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from the Riverside County Health Department dated , 2008. City of Temecula Police Department 19. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from the City of Temecula Police Department dated , 2008. City of Temecula Community Services Department 20. Applicant shall comply with all comments and conditions outlined in the attached letter from the City of Temecula Community Services Department dated _, 2008. C:\DocumenIS and Scttings\Gloria.Wolnick\Local Scttings\Tempormy Intcl11ct Filcs\OLKD4\2008 model condition.doc 3 % 10: ~ TI f I , ~ * Should you have any further questions regarding these conditions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 693-3936. Sincerely, Knute Noland Development Processing Coordinator By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that any changes I may wish to make to the event shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Ray Waite, President P & R Foundation Applicant cc: Lynn Fanene - City of Temecula Police Department Kevin Harrington - City of Temecula Community Services Department Brad Buron - City of Temecula Public Works Department Elsa Wigle - City of Temecula Fire Protection Bureau John Meyer - City of Temecula Redevelopment Department Debbie Ubnoske - City of Temecula Planning Department (Code Enforcement) California Highway Patrol - Temecula Office C:\Documcnts and Scttings\Gloria. Wolnick\Local Scuings\Tcmpol<uy Internet Filcs\OLKD4\2008 model condition. doc 4 ITEM NO.5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Declaration Terminating the Local State of Emergency PREPARED BY: Tamra Middlecamp, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING TERMINATION OF THE LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY THAT HAD BEEN DECLARED ON DECEMBER 11,2007 BY RESOLUTION NO. 07-105 BACKGROUND: On December 11, 2007, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved Resolution 07-105 declaring the existence of a local emergency under existing state and local laws. This action allowed City staff to provide necessary emergency channel grading to the creek behind the T emecula Community Recreation Center that had recently flooded in a moderate rainstorm. It was necessary to grade the channel to avoid additional flooding with the expected heavy rainfall. Since the initial rain event, City staff coordinated with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in determining the minimum amount of grading needed to remediate the emergency situation and to minimize impact to the existing habitat. Grading operations started on December 12, 2007 and the construction work lasted two days. Wherever possible, removal of vegetation (including trees) was avoided. We were successful in grading around vegetation in order to reduce unnecessary impacts. On December 19th, another rain event occurred that provided staff with an opportunity to verify that the channel was graded appropriately. No flooding occurred in this rain event. As such, staff is recommending that the local state of emergency be terminated. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 07-105 RESOLUTION NO. 0 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE TERMINATION OF THE LOCAL STATE OF EMERGENCY THAT HAD BEEN DECLARED ON DECEMBER 11, 2007 BY RESOLUTION 07-105 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On December 11, 2007, the City Council duly adopted Resolution No. 07-105 entitled: "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula Declaring the Existence of a Local Emergency under Government Code Section 8630 and Chapter No. 2.56 of the Temecula Municipal Code". Section 2. Pursuant to Resolution No. 07-105, the City Council found that beginning November 30, 2007, conditions of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property due to flooding of the drainage channel behind the Temecula Community Recreation Center and the City Council declared a local state of emergency on December 11, 2007. Section 3. The grading of the creek area was completed on December 13, 2007. On December 19th, another rain event occurred that provided staff with an opportunity to verify that the channel was graded appropriately. No flooding occurred in this rain event. Section 4. Termination of Local Emergency. The City Council hereby terminates the local emergency declared by Resolution No. 07-105 as of January 22,2008. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify this Resolution in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:lResos 2007/Resos 07-91 [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22rndday of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk R:lResos 2007/Resos 07-91 2 ITEM NO.6 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance January 22, 2008 ~ ~ Approval of the FY 2008-09 Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board Annual Report and Declaration of Intention to Levy an Assessment Against Lodging Businesses within the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District for FY 2008-09 PREPARED BY: David Bilby, Senior Debt Analyst Rudy J. Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF BACKGROUND: On September 27,2005, the City Council considered a request from the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau (CONVIS) to form a Tourism Business Improvement District to promote tourism in the Temecula Valley. As part of its consideration of this item, the City Council held a public meeting on November 8, 2005 to receive further information regarding the intended purpose and operation of the District. All sixteen of the potentially affected lodging establishments were notified and three representatives of Temecula hotels spoke to urge formation of the District. On December 13, 2005, a Public Hearing was held to consider protests regarding the formation of the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District. A majority protest was not received and, therefore, Council enacted Ordinance No. 05-17 establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TVTBID). Also adopted were Resolution No. 05-120 to levy an assessment for fiscal year 2006-07 in the TVTBID and Resolution No. 05-121 to establish an advisory board for the TVTBID. A Management Agreement between the City of Temecula and the CONVIS was also approved for the operation and administration of the TVTBID. According to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (the Law), the City Council is authorized to annually undertake proceedings to levy an assessment against businesses within the TVTBID. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the TVTBID Advisory Board has prepared and filed with the City Clerk a report for fiscal year 2008-09. The report, which is being presented to City Council for approval, thoroughly details the proposed budget and activities, programs and events for the District for the coming year. If Council approves the report, another action should be taken to declare the City Council's intention to levy an assessment against lodging businesses for fiscal year 2008-09 within the District and to set the time and place of a public hearing. At the scheduled Public Hearing, testimony will be heard and protests may be made by any person with an interest in the proposed levy. After the Public Hearing in the absence of a majority protest, the Council may elect to take additional action to levy the assessment for the fiscal year 2008-09 (March 1,2008 through February 28,2009). FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that the 2% annual assessment would result in the collection of approximately $578,000 in fiscal year 2008-09 which would be used by the CONVIS for the promotion of tourism. The City would receive up to 2% of the assessments, or approximately $11,560, to offset administrative costs. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 08- Resolution No. 08- Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau 07 Annual Report- Building Our Brand Growing Our Community Together Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau 08 Annual Report- Budget and Marketing Plan RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, California Streets and Highways Code Sections 36500 et seq., (the "Law") authorizes the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") to annually levy an assessment against businesses within a business improvement area for the purposes of promoting tourism, which is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges, or taxes imposed in the City of Temecula (the "City"). Section 2. Pursuant to the Law, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 05-16 on December 13, 2005, establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Improvement District in the City (the "TVTBID"). Section 3. The Law requires the City Council to appoint an advisory board which shall prepare an annual report for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the activities described in the report and which shall make recommendations to the City Council on the expenditure of revenues derived from the levy of assessments, on the classification of businesses, as applicable, and on the method and basis of levying the assessments. Section 4. By previous resolution, the City Council appointed the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board to serve as the advisory board for the TVTBID (the "Advisory Board"). Section 5. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the Advisory Board has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council, a report for fiscal year 2008-09 in connection with the proposed levy of an assessment against lodging businesses with the TVTBID entitled, "07 Annual Report" and "08 Annual Report: Budget and Marketing Plan" (the "Reports"). Section 6. The City Council has examined and reviewed the Report, and such report is hereby preliminarily approved as filed. Section 7. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify to the vote adopting this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09 AND FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING NOTICE THEREOF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq., (the "Law") authorizes the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") to annually levy an assessment against businesses within a business improvement area for the purpose of promoting tourism, which is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed in the City of Temecula (the "City"). Section 2. That pursuant to the Law, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 05-16 on December 13, 2005, establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District in the City (the "TVTBID"). Section 3. That the Law requires the City Council to appoint an advisory board which shall prepare an annual report for each fiscal year for which assessments are to be levied and collected to pay the costs of the activities described in the report and which shall make recommendations to the City Council on the expenditure of revenues derived from the levy of assessments, on the classification of businesses, as applicable, and on the method and basis of levying the assessments. Section 4. By previous resolution, the City Council appointed the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District Advisory Board to serve as the advisory board for the TVTBID (the "Advisory Board"). Section 5. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the Advisory Board has prepared and filed with the City Clerk, and the City Clerk has presented to the City Council, a report for fiscal year 2008-09 in connection with the proposed levy of an assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID entitled, "07 Annual Report" and "08 Annual Report: Budget and Marketing Plan" (the "Reports") and, by previous resolution, the City Council preliminarily approved the Report as filed. Section 6. The boundaries of the TVTBID are the boundaries of the City, and include all lodging businesses therein. Section 7. The City Council hereby declares its intention, in addition to any assessments, fees, charges or taxes imposed by the City, to levy and collect an assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID boundaries pursuant to the Law for fiscal year 2008-09 (March 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009). Such assessment is not proposed to increase from the assessment levied and collected in the TVTBID for fiscal year 2007-08. The proposed fiscal year 2008-09 TVTBID assessment is to be levied on all lodging businesses, which include hotels, motels, and bed and breakfasts as defined in Temecula Municipal Code (the "Municipal Code") Section 3.20.040, within the TVTBID boundaries based upon two percent (2%) of the rent charged by the operator per occupied room per night. Extended stays, defined as stays of more than 30 consecutive calendar days, and those exempt persons, as defined in Municipal Code Section 3.20.040, will be exempt from the levy of the assessment. The assessments will not be included in gross room rental revenue for the purpose of determining the amount of the Transient Occupancy Tax imposed pursuant to Chapter 3.20 of the Municipal Code. New lodging businesses established within the boundaries of the TVTBID after the beginning of the 2008-09 fiscal year will not be exempt from the levy of the fiscal year 2008-09 assessment. The assessment shall be collected in monthly installments as set forth in Chapter 3.40 of the Municipal Code. Section 8. The revenues raised from the levy and collection of the assessment shall be used for marketing and promotions to increase tourism and market the Temecula Valley area as a tourist destination that benefits lodging businesses located and operating within the boundaries of the TVTBID as provided for in Chapter 3.40 of the Municipal Code, and shall not be used for any other purposes. The City shall retain two percent (2%) of the collected revenues to pay for collecting the assessments and administering the TVTBID. Section 9. The City Council hereby fixes the time and place for a public hearing on the proposed levy of the fiscal year 2008-09 assessment against lodging businesses within the TVTBID as follows: Time: Date: Place: 7:00 p.m. February 12, 2008 City of Temecula City Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California. Section 10. At the public hearing the testimony of all interested persons regarding the levy of the assessment within the TVTBID for fiscal year 2008-09 will be heard. A protest may be made orally or in writing at the public hearing. A. Any protest pertaining to the regularity or sufficiency of the proceedings shall be in writing and clearly state the irregularity or defect to which objection is made. B. Every written protest must be filed with the City Clerk at or before the time fixed herein for the public hearing. Written protests may be delivered or mailed to the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92589. C. The City Council may waive any irregularity in the form or content of any written protest and at the public hearing may correct minor defects in the proceedings. A written protest may be withdrawn in writing at any time before the conclusion of the public hearing. D. Each written protest must contain a written description of the business in which the person signing the protest is interested, sufficient to identify the business and its address. If the person signing the protest is not shown on the official records of the City as the owner of the business, then the protest shall contain or be accompanied by written evidence that the person is the owner of the business. If the owner of the business is a corporation, LLC, partnership or other legal entity, the authorized representative for the entity shall be authorized to sign the protest. Section 11. If at the conclusion of the public hearing, there are of record, written protests (submitted and not withdrawn) by the owners of the businesses within the TVTBID that will pay fifty percent (50%) or more of the total assessments of the entire TVTBID, no further proceedings to levy the proposed fiscal year 2008-09 assessment, as contained in this Resolution, shall be taken for a period of one year from the date of the finding of a majority protest by the City Council. If the majority of written protests is only as to an improvement or activity proposed, then that type of improvement or activity shall not be included in the TVTBID. Section 12. Further information regarding the TVTBID may be obtained from the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92589. For a full and detailed description of the boundaries of the TVTBID, the activities to be provided for fiscal year 2008-09 and the proposed fiscal year 2008-09 assessment, reference is hereby made to the Report of the Advisory Board. The Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to public inspection. Section 13. The City Clerk is instructed to provide notice of the public hearing by publishing this Resolution in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least seven days before the hearing. Section 14. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify to the vote adopting this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Temecula Valley TID-2007 2007 Highlight by Month .==-~__.<~-o==--==-~_~~_~~~~... 2007-2008 Media Plan 2007 Advertising-Samples 2007 Trade Show Attended 2007 Hotel Occupancy 2007 TID Budget 2007 Press Releases SECTION 1 .:. JClVl.-UClytj 2007 H-!C;H-UC;HTS .++ . · January 2nd, hired Leslie Mercado as new Sales Manager. · January 9th, held the first stand-alone Planning Session for the TVCVB ~~..' and inducted the 2007 Executive Board of Directors. ~.. ~ · January 16th, sponsored CNIGA event at Pechanga Resort $t Casino with TVCVB logoedgolf shirts. · January 18th, held 2nd Annual Customer Service Training Seminar at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. · January 20th and 21 st, TVCVB attended the Orange County Register Tradeshow at the OC Fairgrounds in Anaheim. · January 22nd, M$t with the City of Temecula to review the 2007-2008 Tourism Improvement District budget. · January 23rd, hired NuVision Productions, Inc. to produce DVD presentations for the March Annual Meeting and Speaker's Bureau Education MarketingCamp~ign. · January 30th, partnered with Concordia Univetsity in the launching of the Oistinguished Service Certific?lfe Program that will be offered at the new Education Complexi,b Temecula, · January 30th, set up on-line tracking system throl,lgh NxtBook Media for tracking website Meeting Plannjng Guide click- throughs. f~-' .... ,,' ihj'....1 " California Hotel Occupancy & Room Rates (December 2006) December statewide occupancy again dipped below 2005 levels, as has been .'. '. ..' '.' the case during most of the second half of 2006. December year-to-date aver- age came in at 0.9% over the prior year. RevPAR for the year was 9.3% above 2005. - Source: STR Report, CA Lodging Industry Performance, 1/07. I U.S. Lodging Revenue Grows, Rate Slows - Pricewaterhouse Coopers and Smith Travel Research have both projected that 2007 reve- I nue per available room, will rise by 5.87% this year compared with 7.4% last year and 8.5% in 2005. I · Revenue at U.S. hotels will keep increasing this year, but at a slower rate than in the past couple of years as demand begins to fall I behind the supply of new hotel rooms. · Bjorn Hanson, an analyst with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, forecast growth in both hotel supply and demand will increase 1.6% this year, while occupancy will be slightly lower. He also forecast aggregate profit at U.S. hotels will rise 8.5% this year to $27.4 billion, compared with an increase of 11.6% last year and a 35.6% jump in 2005. · For every 10 percent increase in gas prices, lodging demand falls 0.41 percent, Hanson estimated. - Source: Reuters, 1/22/07, reporting on the 2007 Hotel Investment Conference, Los Angeles. International Arrivals at California Ports of Entry (November 2006) - Although November is typically not a strong month for interna- tional arrivals, Germany was up for the first time since April, and gains from several of California's secondary European markets were encouraging: Netherlands +7.8%, Ireland +30.7%, Italy and Austria, up 6.3% and 2.1% respectively. - Source: CIC Research Inc., DHS, January 2007. International Arrivals to U.S. Up in October - 3.6 million international visitors traveled to the United States, an increase of 8% over Octo- ber 2005. Visitation was also up 5% for the first ten months of the year (year-to-date) compared to the same period in 2005. International visitors also spent over $9.0 billion (receipts and passenger fares), which was up 4%. _ Source: OTTI, January 2007. Another Record Year for World Tourism - With 842 million arrivals and a 4.5% growth rate, 2006 exceeded expectations as the tourism sector continued to enjoy above average results, making it a new record year for the industry. The latest UNWTO World Tourism Barometer figures suggest that 2007 will consolidate this performance and turn into the fourth year of sustained growth. Forecast 2007: · The increase in international tourist arrivals is projected to be around 4%, much in line with the forecast long-tenn annual growth rate of 4.1% through 2020. · As a whole, the global economy is expected to maintain last year's growth level. Oil prices have shown a tendency to remain less volatile and do not pose the risk to economic stability they did a year ago. - Source: World Tourism Organization, 1/29/07. Jfn _CD .-1: .-S #II,... .,. ~ ~v. C y- Walk Ins.........,.......,....,..................,.....l ,093 Room Night Bookings.....,................. ....65 Phone Calls......,..,."..........,.,.......,..".." 1 ,084 Media Inquires........."...........,...............8 E-Mail Requests,........,..,..,.....,......,..,.,.. ,,,209 FAM Tours/Tradeshows...,...,............,... ,,4 Mail Orders ""'" ,..,........,....,.,.......,... ..1 ,919 Events & Festivals.. ,."..........,......... .....,...1 Marketed Community Events. ... . . . .. . .... .. . .... .. . . . ..25 February 2007 Highlights February Accomplishments - February 1: Held TID Advisory Board Meeting at City Hall. - February 2: Staff met with POW WOW 2007 Reps to review Pre-FAM Tours. - February 5 & 6: Conducted Interviews for Visitor Center Sales Associates. - February 6: Staff met with San Diego CVB regarding Volunteer Programs. - February 10& 11: Attended LA Times & Travel Expo at L.B. Convention Ctr. - February 15: Met with Temecula Valley Winegrowers Assn. to discuss future marketing partnerships and branding. - February 13 & 27: Attended Temecula City Council Meetings where the TID fNas approved for 2007 with an estimated budget of $538,000. - February 22: Hired and trained new Sales Associates. - February 26: Developed DVD Presentation for Annual Meeting. Annual Meetinl!' DVD Presentation Hil!'hlil!'hts Tradeshows and Media Events- The Bureau participated in 10 Industry Tradeslwws and Media Events through a number of organizations such as the California Travel Industry Association, Hospitality Sales & Marketing Association International, California Society of Association Executives and California Travel and Tourism Commission. Gaining exposure through this form of event marketing has proven to be beneficial and necessanj in order to reach specific target market segments. Familiarization (FAM) TOUIS-FAM Tours are an effective way to "show off' the Temecula Valley as a premier destination. TIle Bureau was a partner in 8 FAM Tours and entertained such groups as Disney, San Diego Concierge, the Travel Cafe and the California Outdoor Writer's Association. Mixers-In 2006, the Bureau partnered with special event groups to offer Mixersfor the membership, including the Hot Summer Nights Mixer and the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival Movie Screening and Post Mixer. Special Events & Tourism Promotions-Efforts to help foster community special events were a main focus of the Bureau, as well as promoting the region to event~ attending visitors. Personalized letters, postcards, sample itineraries and visitor guides were sent to pre-registered guests of many 2006 events, in hopes to proactively familiarize visitors with the region and entice them to extend their stays. The Bureau marketed over 400 special events throughout the year. Quarterly Meetings-Keeping members informed of the many features and benefits of the Temecula ValleJ.} is a goal of the Bureau. Holding Quarterly Meetings at unique, new and enhanced locations helps to build strong community partnerships. Another goal is to nurture community tourism businesses by offering annual spe- cialized training to encourage exceptional customer service throughout the Valley. Branding/Publications-Getting the right message across with consistency and continuity was a priman} focal point for the Bureau. The development of clean, appealing imagery with eye-catching colors was utilized in all brand collateral and messaging. New marketing material was created with the Travel, Meeting and Event Planning Guide as well as improvements and enhancements to the Visitors Guide and Tri~jold Rack Brochure. The brand message was also carried through in the Bureau's first pop-up display. Year-To-Date Statistical Data-In 2006,jorty thousand visitor guides were distributed to prospective visitors, community businesses, leisure and group inquiries, handed outat tradeshows and FAM Tours and placed in a majority of hotel guestrooms in the Temecula Valley. TIle Bureau received over 23,500 tourism-related phone calls, over 19,500 walk-ins, 657 website-produced room nights and generated over $91,000 dollars in hotel room revenue. Strategic Marketing Plan - The highly anticipated Strategic Marketing Plan was unveiled in December by Carl Ribaudo of the Strategic Marketing Group. The plan's fruition came from comprehensive interviews with prominent business oumers and managers within the Temecula Valley community, extensive research and expert industry knowledge from the Board of Directors. The total Media Plan includes nearly $425,000 in funds to market the Temecula Vallerj as a premier, top-tier tourism destination. Media Buys- The Strategic Marketing Plan identified geo-targeted marketing and advertising opportunities through appropriate media sources in Southern Califor- nia (LA and OC), Northern California and outside California, secondarily. Marketing efforts have been achieved through Local Media; Regionally; Newspapers; South- west; Statewide; Wine and Golf; the Meetings Market; and Online. Email & Postcard Campaigns-A direct mail campaign was launched, sending 9,000 scenic postcards to the Meetings Market, the Film Industry and Travel/Trade Writers, as well as an Email program that electronically sent more than 1,500 emails with a call to action to visit the Temecula Valley. Hotel Occupancy-For 2006, 'wtel occupancy in the Temecula Valley averaged 72.5%. Comparing occupancy percentages with surrounding segments, the Temecula Valley was consistently higher than North San Diego, Newport Beach and Dana Point, Palm Springs, Santa Barbara, Napa Valley and California in general. The average room rate for the Temecula Valley was $102.21 and the revenue per available room (orRevPar) was $74.09. Board of Directors- The 2006 Board of Directors for the Bureau was, and continues to be, a dynamic group of individuals who represent key tourism entities within the local community. Their guidance, expertise, dedication and action-oriented methodologJj has, and will continue to take the Bureau to new heights and elevate the Bureau's reputation as a premier tourism marketing agency in Southwest California. Z007-As you can see, 2006 was a pivotal year for the Bureau. With our strong leadership team and all of our key components in place, we are geared up for the chal- lenge to take our brand to the next level and grow our community together. With our now $1 million budget, we will continue to strengthen our position through ad~ vertising, marketing, tradeshows, FAM tours and special event participation. Building our brand includes launching our new Visit Temecula.info retail and visitors center, hiring additional Public Relations and Marketing staff and acquiring our own office space. Thank you to those who have been an integral part of the Bureau and for believing in the vision of making the Temecula Valley the place you want to be. California Travel Research I California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (January 2007) - January statewide occupancy was 1.1 % below January 2006, with most sub-areas showing declines. Among the exceptions: Oakland and the Central Coast. Room rates were up 6.9% and RevPAR up 5.7%. -Source: Smith Travel Research. CA Lodging Industry Pertormance. February 2007. STATE TRAVEL IMPACTS The multi-billiou dollar travel industry in Califomia is a vital part of the state and local economies. The industry is represented primarily by retail and service firms, including lodging establishments, restaurants, retail stores, gasoline service stations, and other types of businesses that sell their products and services to travelers. The money that visitors spend on various goods and services while in California produces business receipts at these firms, which in turn employ California residents and pay their wages and salaries. State and local government units benefit from travel as well. The state government collects taxes on the gross receipts of businesses operating in the state, as well as sales and use taxes levied on the sale of goods and services to travelers. Local governments also collect sales and use taxes generated from traveler purchases. IMPACTS OF TRAVEL IN CALIFORNIA: A SUMMARY . Total direct travel spending in California was $93.8 billion in 2006. Over the past three years, travel spending has increased in California at an average auuual rate of 6.9%. During the past year, travel spending increased by 6.0%. . A substantial share of the increase in travel spending was due to higher room rates, airfares and gasoline prices. Inflation-adjusted (constant dollar) travel spending increased by 2.0% from 2005 to 2006. . Thirty million visitors traveled to and through California by air in 2006, essentially unchanged from the preceding year. . Duriug 2006, travel spending in California directly supported 928,700 jobs with earnings of $28.5 billion. Travel spending generated the greatest uumber of jobs in arts, entertainment and recreation (233,700 jobs), food service (274,700), and accommodations (203,700). . Visitors that stayed overnight in paid accommodations spent $49.6 billion in 2006 (57% of all visitor spending in the state). . Travel spending in 2006 generated $2.1 billion in local taxes and $3.5 billion in state taxes. . In 2006, one hundred dollars ($100) of travel spendiug geuerated $30.36 of earnings, $2.20 of locat tax revenue, and $3.78 of state tax revenue. . In 2006, the amount of travel speodiog that supported oue job in travel-related businesses was $101.000. RECENT TRAVEL TRENDS IN CALIFORNIA Total direct travel spending in California was $93.8 billion in 2006. Over the past three years, travel spendiug has iucreased in California at an average annual rate of 6.9%. During the past year, travel spending increased by 6.0%. Overall, earnings increased by 3.9% and employment by 2.0%. California Direct Travel Impacts, 1992-2006p Spending Earnings Employment Tax Receipts ($Billiou) ($Billion) ($Billion) (Thousand) Local State Federal Total 1992 52.1 16.4 771 0.9 1.9 2.9 5.8 1993 53.1 16.5 772 1.0 2.0 2.9 5.8 1994 54.0 16.9 795 1.0 2.0 2.9 5.9 1995 55.4 17.4 812 l.l 2.1 2.9 6.2 1996 60.2 18.7 848 1.2 2.3 3.1 6.6 1997 65.5 20.2 887 1.4 2.5 3.3 7.2 1998 67.8 21.6 892 1.5 2.6 3.4 7.5 1999 72.2 23.1 929 1.6 2.8 3.6 7.9 2000 78.0 24.9 942 1.7 2.9 3.9 8.6 2001 74.7 24.3 876 1.6 2.8 4.1 8.5 2002 74.0 24.6 858 1.6 2.8 4.2 8.7 2003 76.8 25.3 878 1.7 2.9 4.2 8.8 2004 81.9 26.6 895 1.7 3.2 4.4 9.3 2005 88.5 27.4 910 1.9 3.4 4.7 10.0 2006 93.8 28.5 929 2.1 3.5 4.9 10.5 Estimates for 2006 are preliminary. Earnings include payroll, other earned income and proprietor income. Employment includes payroll employees and proprietors. Annual Change for 1992-2006 is the average annual percentage change. A preliminary estimate of domestic air travel to and through California also indicates a flattening of growth relative to the strong increases of the preceding 3 years. ,""~''''~"''''''~'''~='''-'''''""~,"^,~'''.''''.'''';''''''''~'''''''~','''''''',",,-",,,';-,,.-"~~,,,- ~~~ii:;~~~-~J' ~ , ! !~ ~ " ~ , ~ ! , i ! I i ~ ! ! I I I I i I I , I I I I I I I i i I ! ! t I ! I [ i I t I j ! I t 4 ;' , ................................... ~<=""~""'''<,"'''M~''<$''''~'<M'''''"'''''_''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''..$.."""...."",......."...,,,........,,....".......,.w....,...,..,,",,.._,,=~~.M".............""......."............=........c.c...,../I Visit Temecula.info Now Open as a Premier Resource and Visitors Center On March 10th, the TVCVB opened its doors to a brand new, visually enhanced, interactive visi- tor's center in Old Town Temecula, next to the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. This new information center features large graphic displays of the Temecula Valley's unique fea- tures and amenities. It also serves as a place to arrange hotel accommodations, restaurant reser- vations and get the latest news on current events and upcoming special events. Also featured is the CVB's exciting new Temecula Valley logo ~ ~ * , , ~ ~ , 1 ! ~ ! ! ! I ! I , I merchandise and appareL It's fresh, hip and i nothing like you've seen yet in our region! The ! Ofhficial ribbfonccutting with thhe Temecula Valley ! Camber 0 ommerce was eld on Thursday, I March 15th and there were over 60 people in ! ! attendance to help "welcome" the new store. ! Feel free to stop by and say hello to our charm- I ing visitor center staff, who will greet you with ! ! a smile and assist you with all of your informa- , tional needs. Don't forget to refer your busi- I ness associates, employees and relatives to the center...we'll make it easy to "find unique ;rthings to do," "learn about the best !:rplaces to dine," "experience the sim- plicity of making a room reservation" and "learn the best way to get from here to there." The center is open from ..9:00am-6:00pm daily and is located at :.......42031 Main Street, Suite C. We look -~~:forward to seeing you there! i!!U, J~~; "~"-"h~; .............................81 ......................................11 ...........................5 [ California Travel Research ] 8.0% above 2006. International Travelers (2005): California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (February.2007): Statewide occupancy has dipped below the prior year levels in seven out of the past nine months. Room rates remain strong, pushing revenue per available room (RevPAR) for February - Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Performance, 03/07 2007 TV CVB Annual Meeting ~~~':~~a~:c~:~~~~::~~~, Kim- award on Doug for his out- efforts for the year. Doug Leiber, General Manager for standing contributions to the the Temecula Creek Inn was given the TVCVB's highest tourism industry in the Temecula honor, the Miiyu Yam Award for his unmatched leader- Valley and to our community. ship and efforts in taking tourism in the Temecula Valley to the next level. The award was named in honor of Pechanga Resort & Casino and Pechanga Development Corporation for their support in helping to foster tourism development. Miiyu Yam means "Welcome All" in the Luiseiio language. Chairman of the Board, Denis Fergu- Country Philippines Hong Kong Taiwan Australia France India Germany Italy Japan Scandinavia Visitors to US 154,000 135,000 319,000 582,000 879,000 345,000 1,416,000 546,000 3,884,000 693,000 Visitors to California 116,000 81,000 191,000 313,000 261,000 98,000 309,000 106,000 722,000 118,000 .' ~";::' Q.' .' ,;;,: .,) '. ; -~~ 4.1 '. . ,""',' , . . , \_f\ i \ " (,\ t T .~~, f:::~ J '\ i { Local Irish Dancers "kicked off" the event in style. On Thursday, March 15th, the NCVB held its first stand alone Annual Meeting where the focus was Building our Brand and Growing Our Community TOGETHER. Youth Irish Dancers started the show with a lively and entertaining performance. Doug Leiber welcomed the group and Mayor Chuck Washington gave an inspiring speech on our growing tourism economy and his enthusiasm for the future of the Temecula Valley. The 2006 year-in-review DVD was pre- sented, showing the progress and % to California 75.4% 59.8% 59.8% 53.8% 29.7% 28.4% 21.8% 19.5% 18.6% 17.0% Increase/Decrease from 2004 6.0% increase 42.0% increase 7.9% increase 21.0% increase 21.0% increase 8.0% decrease 12.4% increase 8.0% decrease 14.6% increase 49.0% increase ,'..'''" Kimberly Adams presents Doug Leiber with the Miiyu Yam Award. Gunfighters in Old Town, a Anaheim Convention Center, cultural tour of the Great Oak was a fun "club-like" Tree at Pechanga Resort &: atmosphere and Temecula was Casino and a lesson on wine represented with colorful tasting, wine blending and banners, wine tasting from The TVCVB participated in the varietals by South Coast Winery seven wineries and four casino prestigious 39th Annual Travel Resort &: Spa and Wilson Creek gaming tables that gave Industry Association's International Winery. Journalists interviewed attendees the opportunity to Pow Wow in Anaheim from April 21 Amy Minniear of the Pechanga "bit it big" and win great prizes! - 25, 2007. Tbis tradeshow is the Development Corporation about Attendees for the entire event largest generator of "Visit USA" the rich heritage and culture of were 5,500 strong and included travel and T emecula was a part of the Luisefio Band of Indians, as International Buyers, Domestic the travel industry's premier well as Bill Wilson from Wilson Buyers and International international marketplace. On Creek Winery and John Journalists, all from 70+ Saturday, April 21st we hosted 42 McPhearson of Sourh Coast countries. The TVCVB acbieved t r a vel pro f e s s ion a Iso n a Winery Resort &: Spa regarding its goal of promoting a fun, Familiarization Tour through the popularity and inrtigue of exciting, unique guest T emecula. They experienced being wine making and blending. The experience that they can only robbed by the Old Town final evening, held at the get in the TemeculaValley. Walk Ins... .................. ............3,466 Room Night Bookings... .... ........ ...............48 Phone Calls......... ............ ......3,609 Media Inquires......... ............. ................. 13 E-Mail Requests...................... ..292 FAM Tours/Tradeshows....................... ......3 Mail Orders........ ... ..... ..... .... ..2,467 Events & Festivals............ ... ... .... ...............2 Catlln\a California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates, March 2007 - Hotel occupancy. was essentially flat for the month of March in California. the Pacific region and the US. Submarkets that managed to escape the downward trends included Eureka! r~lilm~~r.~\\p"'lII~ Cresc~nt City, Santa Rosa, Oakland,. San Jose/Santa Clara, and the C~ntral Coast. ~:.~ ~~~ \A~ Standing alone as the sole California submarket to show double-digit occupancy c.. growth was San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles, up 11.9%. -Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Performance, April 2007. U.S. PROJECTS 53 MILLION INT'L VISITORS IN 2007. The Office of Travel and Tourism Industries projections suggest that nearly 53 million international travelers will visit America in 2007. International visitation to the U.S. increased 4% to 51.1 million visitors in 2006, just shy of the previous record of 51.2 million set in 2000. Ten of the top fifty markets to the US set visitation records. Preliminary figures released by OTTI indicate that international visitor spending (exports) reached $107.8 billion in travel and tourism-related goods and services in 2006, an increase of more than $5 billion over 2005. Significant increases from India, China, Canada and Brazil helped offset spending declines by many European countries. -Source: TI News, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries, 4/11/07. Temecula Wine 1St Music Festival- The TVCVB participated at the festival for the first time and was able to meet with local and many non-local guests of the event. Our booth allowed us to offer additional information on events and activities in the Temecula Valley. We met guests who came from Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Diego Counties and all had smiles on their faces from the great music, food and ambiance they were experiencing at the festival. California Marketplace Trade Show - Our Sales . Manager, Leslie Mercado, has been busy generating group leads and attending market- specific trade shows. She recently participated in the California Meetings Marketplace Show in San Diego on April 15-18. Sponsored by Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival The TVCVB will be participating again at the Balloon & Wine Festival from Friday, June 1st through Sunday, June 3rd at Lake Skinner. A goal of the CVB is to help support and partner with our local community special events to hopefully create more awareness. So put on your sunscreen, come enjoy the festival and stop by our booth to say hello (we'll be located right next to Pechanga). Wfi; ~: ~~~. l}; Successful Meetings Magazine, this event provided a ~ forum to build one-on-one relationships and !!II networking opportunities for attendees by I combining an educational session, social activities %C,. and exclusive appointments. Attendees were pre- qualified planners considering California for their meeting destination with a minimum of 50 room nights. Leslie met with 15 meeting planners and received 13 sales leads. Xterra Races - T emecula has many exciting sporting activities and competitions. This year the TVCVB is sponsoring the Xterra America Tour West Championship at Vail Lake Resort on May 19 1St 20. The location is complete with sagebrush, cactus and dried-up tiverbeds and is an ideal rugged setting for the nation's premier off-road multi-sport gathering. Participants will compete in Duathlons, Triathlons, 5K and lOK Runs. Kids can even get in the spirit with their own races. Xterra helps to promote health and June Quarterly Meeting Don't miss our next Quarterly Meeting on Thursday. June 14th at II :30am at South Coast Winery Resort & Spa. We will be sharing results and findings from the newly completed Tourism Impact Study by Dean Runyan and Associates. Hear astonishing facts and figures about the impacts of visitors and tourism spending in the Temecula Valley. RSVP to Carrie Penny 888-363- 2852 or carrie@temecula.org. Tourism in 2006 pumped more than a half a billion dollars into the Temecula Valley econ- omy and is responsible for more than 6,000 jobs in the region, according to a benchmark economic study completed by the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and City of Temecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four-fold in- crease from $131.2 million six years earlier. The 36-page report attributed the dramatic growth in large part to the soaring popularity of Temecula's Wine Country and to expansions at Pechanga Resort & Casino. ''This report clearly shows that tourism and recreation play a much more vital role in Temecula's regional economy than previously thought," said Kim- berly Adams, executive director of the Temec- ula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. "That's why it is so important that we continue to get the message out about Wine Country, Pechanga and the many special events in our area to the estimated 25 million people who live in Southern California and the thousands of business travelers who flock to the region each year." Other study highlights: . One out of nine employees in T emecula work in hospitality and leisure services. . Temecula captured $1 of every $10 spent by visitors in Riverside County in 2005. . The Temecula Valley attracted nearly 2.2 million visitors in 2006. . Each visitor spent about $245 a day ($332 per party) while in Temecula. . Tourism supports an estimated 6,520 jobs in Temecula. . Travel spending resulted in $168.3 mil- lion in income to Temecula businesses and workers. Tourism-related spending created $5.2 million in local taxes and $15.9 million in state taxes. . Hotel room sales reached about $40 million in 2006. Temecula now accounts for 4 percent of Riverside County's transient occupancy tax (TOT) receipts, double what it was in the mid-1990s. The robust growth of TOT reve- nue, even in the face of a post-September 2001 travel slump, showed that tourism is exceptionally strong in the Temecula Valley. "No local industry could show the same level of revenue and employment growth from 2000 to 2006," said Dean Runyan, Read all about it! president and founder of Dean Runyan As- sociates. "It's even accelerated over the last couple of years." The key to continued growth will be how well the region nurtures Wine Country - one of its biggest assets, he said. "People can go elsewhere for casinos but they can not go someplace else for this wine experience," he said. Earlier this year the bureau approved a marketing plan that is projected to boost revenue at area hotels and motels by at least $4.7 million over the next five years. The projection was part of an 84-page report put together by Strategic Marketing Group of South Lake Tahoe that will serve as the blueprint for the bureau's efforts to brand and market the T emecula Valley. The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate. economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a pre- miere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. # # # The Bureau has received positive responses from the media. See attached articles indicating media coverage from the CVB's press release. The TVCVB and the Temecula Valley Wine Growers Association have part- nered on a new full-size billboard along the 1-10 and 1-215 Freeways. Our target audience will be travelers from Los Angeles, Orange County, San Bernardino, Ontario and Arizona. We are strategically placed next to one of Pechanga Resort & Casino's billboard which will promote the Te- mecula Valley as an unparalleled, premier destination. Walk Ins...................1,909 Room Night Bookings...............74 Phone Calls..............1,857 Media Inquiries.........................16 Email Requests..........229 FAM Tours/Trade shows.............1 Mail Orders.................478 Events & Festivals.......................4 Marketed Events...........................325 May Inquiries & Statistics """"'",,"-:;,g, The TVCVB and TVW A executive team has approached Supervisor Jeff Stoue to request fuudiug for marketing support and regional enhaucement. The focus would be on wine promotion with an effort to build the destination. Listed is the criteria that the Bureau would use to increase awareness of the Temecula Valley-Southern California Wine Couutry. I) Wiue Couutrv Branding- a) De- velop a brand platform and brand positioning for "Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Couutry." b) Develop a strategic brand which iucludes tactical planniug and positioning within the California Wine Industry. 2) Wine Country Strategic Plan & Execution-a) Develop wiue country business model.and strat- egy, aligu with brand develop- ment goals to increase sales growth. b) Hire Reputation Engi- ueer/PR Agency actiug as the Sales Agent for the "Temecula Valley Southern California Wine Country." 3) Marketing EducationlPublic Rela- tious-a) Hire Public Rela- tionlMarketiug Sales Rep for edu- cational outreach and the promo- tion of quality wiue. b) Attend wine related tradeshows within drive markets to include, San Diego, Los Angeles, Orange County, Santa Barbara, Aspen, Monterey, Las Vegas, Arizona and San Francisco. 4) Media Productiou-a) Develop media tools for iudustry usage to promote wine productiou, quality, and tourism experience. Media productiou to iuclude B-roll, Beta aud DVD. 5) Wiue Advertising-a) Purchase media advertising in wine indus- try publications to promote T e- mecula Valley Southern Califor- nia Wine quality. b) Advertising media to iuclude Wine Spectator, Wine Enthusiast and Wall Street Journal. 6) Visitor Center-a) Open Visitors Center in Wine Country for educa- tional outreach and the promotion. Coufirmatiou of funding is still peudiug but the Bureau is strongly encouraged by the positive feedback from Supervi- sor Jeff Stone and staff. ~r---~"'---""'---""'V>>J"%"!S"W:"WklJlf.~"""""..""m"wa'@"'''_-'''-". ,',' ..; ';' .. .,,;,, .- ,__".-.<.; .," .' i''- .... """, The Bureau sponsored the 2007 Xterra America Tour West Championship at Vail Lake Resort on May 19 & 20. TVCVB staff witnessed 600 racers, 50 crew mem- bers (all from out of state) and 45 professionals from throughout the United Sates and Europe. There was great attendance with 2500 on Saturday and 1500 on Sunday. Some of the pro- ceeds from the weekend event benefited the Jr. Dia- betes Association and local charitable organization, Rancho Damacitas. . . Disney FAN "our - Press Release , ~ ~' Temecula a Featured Destination for Japanese Tourists. The Temecula Val- ley can expect to see increased numbers of Japanese tourists this year thanks to a 1-year-old partnership between Disney. land Resorts and the TVCVB. Starting this month T emecula wm once again host dozens of writers, camera crews and travel agencies from Japan that will highlight unique attractions in Temecula for the millions of Japanese travelers who come to the US each year. The Farn tours are the direct result of the 5- year partnership with Disney known as the Southern California Experience that features offsite destinations to Japanese visitors. "In the past year Temecula has been featured in numerous Japanese publications, TV travel shows, guide books and rental car company maps," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. "This valuable program is just another way the bureau is getting the word out about all the things you can do in the Temecula Valley." Interest among Japanese visitors has been par~ ticularly strong for Wine Country, hot air ballooning and a glimpse of the Ameri- can West in Temecula's Old Town. "Many Japanese have never visited a winery," said Tomoko Sawada, senior promotions and public relations manager for Tokyo-based Disney Destination International, which arranges the fam tours. ''The Japanese traveler is always looking for something new to do while in the United States." She estimated that T emecula and several other Southern California destinations have received media coverage valued at more than $70 million since the promotion began last year. In addition, Japanese travel com- panies have developed special Disney packages tours that include trips to other Southern California destinations such as Catalina Island, Newport Beach and San Diego. Many tourist destinations in the Valley have taken steps to accommodate the growing number of Japanese tour- ists. For example, Pechanga Resort & Casino and Magical Adventures hot air balloon company now have interpreters available for Japanese visitors. Tourism is an important and significant part of the Temecula Valley economy, according to a recent study completed by the Temec~ ula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Fam Tour attendee at South Coast Winery Resort & Spa. and City of T emecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four-fold increase from $131.2 million six years earlier. The Temec- ula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tour- ism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a pre~ miere destination to meeting planners, tour opera- tors and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing as- sessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. 'W~~~~~~~~~~~'TIft~~~!f,';~~~~~,1f.$jil'&l\'~'t;i*,,"*$ HSMAI Affordable Mee-c.nss Wes-c "rade Show TVCVB Sales Manager, Leslie Mercado, attended this 2-day event, which took place in San Jose. CA . It hosted 668 planners looking to preview an array of potential sites and destinations and to discover inno- vative products and services. Educational Seminars were offered, including "The Importance of Follow Up - Post Trade Show Follow Up Tips." A Seminar that was geared towards "How to Make the Most of CVB Re- sources" was a popular event. It was determined that meeting planners who have worked with CVB's in the past agreed that they saved precious time and money as they didn't have to deal with the endless details of producing their meetings/events. Surprisingly, however, many planners were not aware of the scope of cost-free services and tools that a CVB can provide. This interactive seminar de- scribed what a CVB can make available, whether the meeting is large or small-such as finding open dates for meetings at the destination of their choice, helping select the right site, researching meeting fa- cilities for both quality and price, finding a qualified destination management company when needed, and much more. They also learned about the new technology that bureaus are aggressively pursuing to aid planners throughout the event planning and management process. The session offered a clear understanding of how to partner with a CVB for stress -free and successful meetings and events time and time again. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TVCYB Trade Show Booth with Marketing Material and Collateral. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ece ~or a tnarKeting ~le\P -Nith oe'ie\op~O ~aci\itieS to co\\atera\ I\/C\/'D has nO LoOglngbranoing ano \iC bo?,-es lhe 1\0 \-\ote\s a ~ regiona\ 0 \Ogoeo a~f'/\aY 'iiSltor the nsistency o. a\\Y creat~' hote\ to OIS? 'iisitors to the ~~ution. spe;I'n each 1\ 'oes ~or the \ \ocation oistfl p\aceu I \anner gUI e centra to be ha'ie bee;o tneeting Pin \-\a'iing o~ou\O pro~~tieS ano guioeS a ano obta . tnation s h the ~acI I eoeo . easi\Y se~C.J'D's i~~~no\Y ~or bO:stOCKeo as nr~gu\ar . ~or t~e'a\ ano user- ;es -Ni\\ be re leatn on a . benellcl lhe bO. center . I.. "uests. ..t \ \/isltOr . tIle b heepu . by our c . .... . basis. . . . · . . . e. . . . . . . . ..- . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . &''ii;;f,\\i,'W&;::l'iBi~*mm~1W~~~~%'*'',~~~~~~Wi~~~~~~~~W1,~Wh"i:%\~"t(*"K'0Jj'i\,@D~~ Pannerlins For A Common Goal One of the CVB's primary goals of marketing to the "drive-market" has been real- ized with two new advertising campaigns. Partnering with the T emecula Valley Wine- growers Association, the T e- mecula Valley now has a presence on the 1-10 / 1-215 Freeways and at the Fashion Valley Mall in San Diego. Bright, colorful and contem- porary graphics encourage people to play, taste, shop, golf, dine and explore the T e- mecula Valley. . . . Walk Ins................... 1,529 Room Night Bookings...............99 Phone Calls............... 1,348 Media Inquiries........................21 Email Requests..............308 FAM Tours/Trade shows.............2 Mail Orders.. ............ ..1,696 Events & Festivals.............. .........2 Marketed Events...........................309 . . . TVCVB Hot Summer Nights Mixer Our annual Hot Summer Nights Mixer was a great time for experienc- ing the local flavors of the Thursday Night Marketplace, mingling ~ and enjoying live jazz and en- tertainment at the Temecula Valley International Jazz Festi- val and getting to know our Te- mecula Valley Visitor Center team members while shopping for one-of-a-kind Temecula Valley apparel and merchan- dise. Some fabulous prizes were won by those who ventured out and got their passports stamped for each destination. Thank you to Chris Baily for hosting us at the Marketplace and to Jane and Jon Laskin for allowing our CVB members to thoroughly enjoy the Jazz Festival. - - ... - - r ... - r d . ... - VV - . c: - ..... - c: - ... 'II: - r The TVCVB is a sponsor at the new Californie Wel- ~ome Center San Bernardino. Our sponsorship in- cludes a lighted display panel with designated ra~k system for T eme~ula Valley ~ollateral. The state of California Department of Tourism ewarded the San Bernardino CVB the 13th offi~ial California Wel~ome Center designation in September 2006 end is aver- aging about 100 walk-in visitors per month. We hosted two media writers in lull}. Carol Dixon visited three different wineries. She is currently covering Iood &' wine, design, luxury ldestyle &' travel for such publications as: Departures, Town and Country, In Style, C, DaillJ Varietlj, USA TODAY, Los Angeles Magazine, Spa, Elite Traveler, Private Air, Tmmp Magazine, LA Conhdential, CITY (NYC), Bel Air, 80S Living, Deser! Living, Axiwna Foothills, Zlnk, CliOW, Napa &' Sonoma, Plate, Travel Ae,e West, Westwa1]s, Genlux, WineCountrg.com, Touring & Iasting, Patterson's The Tasting Panel, GalJot.comand Brentwood Magazines. She was writer, producer and director for a PBS documentan), The American Food Revolu- tion, has been on radio and writes for Discovery Land Co. - current web site spanning over 12 internaHonal proper... ties featuring private luxun], golf and leisure resorts. Our second guest was AndlJ Bender, who visited Old Town Temecula, wine countl1j and Pechangd Resort &' Casino. lie is d heelance travel and food writer for such magazines as Forbes, Fortune, GalJot.com, InStlJle, LonellJ Planet, LA Times, United Airlines and WestwalJs. We are looking forward to seeing some Breat articles about the Temecula Valley and our Southern California Wine Countl'lJ. ~~~Wi&Y;h,*~ Walk Ins... ............ .....1,707 Room Night Bookings... ......... .....71 Phone Calls......... .......1,313 Media Inquiries... ............ ..........14 Email Requests.. ....... .....310 FAM Tours/Trade shows. ..............2 Mail Orders.. ............. ..1,721 Events & Festivals.............. ...... ...3 Marketed Events........... ..........298 ~~~vtr4; ~1lGil~~~ j&il;\t';2~t?}~)'1mB liE'ikt'5ftt;?i&f0t1l !&\\;~f;h~y~iYiill&~ ~L%'B\{@f;WZtm&K~ ~~$g:!lW&:i&~frlzffmE \@Jt~A\i1if;ii?lt~ California Travel Research California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates, June 2007 - California hotel occupancy bumped up 1.8 percent in June. Anaheim/Santa Ana and San Jose/Santa Cruz gained more than 5 percent. Most other sub-regions showed de- clines that have been typical since the middle of last year. California RevPAR for year-to-date is 6.3 percent above 2006 at this time. - Source: Smith Travel Research. CA Lodging Industry Pertormance. July 2007. Overseas Visitors to California Dip in 2006 - Approximately 4.6 million overseas visitors (21.3%) indicated California was a destination on their U.S. trip in 2006, down 3.7% from 4.8 million overseas visitors to California in 2005. OverseIB Visito", to California R.nk Country 2005 200& % Chllnge 1) Uni1ad I-<Jngdom 778,000 752,000 -3.3% 2) Japan 722,000 646,000 -10.5% 3) South Korea 252,000 311,000 23.4% 4) Australi a 313,000 286,000 -8.6% 5) Germany 309,000 241 ,000 -22.0% 6) Ch i na (8 xcI. Hong Ko ng) 146,000 197,000 34.9% 7) F ra nce 261 ,000 186,000 -28.7% El) Taiwan (ROC) 191,000 178,000 -6.8% 9) India 98,000 125,000 27.6% 10) Philippines 116,000 105,000 -9.5% -Source: CIC Research Inc., July 2007 International Arrivals at California Ports of Entry, April 2007 - Overseas arrivals at California Ports of Entry (pO E) was up a scant 0.7%, with strong showings from India (+44.4%), France, Italy and the Netherlands, and upturns for Ja- pan and South America helping offset declines in the U.K. and other key markets. - Source: OTTi. CIC Research Inc., July 2007 Marketing & Promotions twenty double-sided banners were placed strategically throughout the mall and displayed in a very visually ap- pealiug way. Also as part of the program, she met with some of the "Angels" who walk the mall and hand out Te- mecula Valley collateral to visiting shoppers. The CVB has already received inquiry phoue calls regardiug the cur- rent ads, Kimberly Adams visited Fashion Valley Mall iu San Diego this month to see exactly how our marketing banners were "seIliug" the destina- tion. She was pleased to see that the ~lt~~g f&~~~ ?~~~~ _0" ... El'iI_-"'::"'--~';':'- .~.:::~ II ~~~'''',...<'''''''' ":fill"- . ..... &1 Leslie Mercado and some of the Temecula lodging facili- ties visited ARES in San Diego and met with 25 reser- vation agents. They handed out information and encour- \1t11@1f8~~WJf ~~~i\fff~~ aged them to learn more about the Temecula Valley. By visiting the agents, this produces "top of miud awareness" and should in- turn steer us more room reservation bookings, T""ECU_'VAL""",CAL'FO"""A AUGUST 2007 HIGHLIGHTS Valley International Film & Music Festival Event Promotions The eVB is conducting a 3-part mar- keting process to promote the Film Festival and increase room night bookings for the TID hotels. Custom invitations were sent to 1,000 atten- dees. First, to producers and direc- ------.'] tors for day activities. Second, to I international film-makers to extend I their stays to 5-7 nights. "\nd third, I to help promote two tours. A site ..... .1 tour in partnership with the Inland Sl ! Empire Film Commission to assist .--~ ] producers and directors with scout- r,~Ef~.. ing opportunities that will be offered ==""""'R1"'" Thursday, September 13th from ~Uulll""_f_""" ~:?:=~~T... l1am-4pm for up to 112 partici- "'('"""'fl""f~'~~"~URS .,,".c:,:,,~:~:;'~',~}\'~~~;~:J~ pants, as well as a wine tasting tour -..--..- ----- for attendees to get a taste of the - IIIOm,,..&UlQIIOUOll'llIO 11l.oI~',"" ::::''''''' I Too......I..... I ~~.~~:'.:,:=' Irttd:::-J:1.~..~..,...."'" I_--':,~~:':_,~"~:'~:::'~:'::~---- __ Marketing & Advertising Southwest Airlines- Featured Destination Ad For the 2nd time, the CVB marketed the Temecula Valley through a Southwest Airlines 7 -day website promotion. The ad showcased our feature-rich destination by highlight- ing special airfare rates starting at $59 one way via Ontario and San Diego Internationai airports, dis- counted room rates, value-added car rentals and the many fun things to see and do in the Temecula Valley. Our first campaign in March 2007 had over 6 million people exposed to our city via the Click 'n Save email, with 3,799 incremental passengers booking airfare and traveling by Au- gust 24th. The July 2007 campaign had over 6.2 million viewers, booking an incredible 18,204 reservations. The national average spending per person, per day is $127, so if 18,204 passengers spent the national aver- age. that could result in $2,311,908 in direct visitor spending per day within our community. The average increase for all hotel bookings via southwest.com into Temecula was over 255%. Fall Rod Run Promotions- The CVB is supporting the Fall Rod Run this year by performing a 2,000- piece direct mail initiative. We are focusing on existing events by generating extended stay opportunities for visitors from out- side the area. Temecula Wine Country on Fri- day, September 14th from l1am- 4pm for up to 112 attendees. The C,-7J3 will also host the VIP Hospi- tality Suite for the festival from Wednesday, September 12th- Sunday, September 16th. Staff and volunteers will be on hand to en- sure the visiting guests have all the information they need regarding our region. On Thursday, August 16th, the CVB participated in the festival's Media Event at Temecula Creek Inn. Staff was present to answer tourism questions, distrib- ute media kits and support the Film Festival in their marketing efforts. SportsTravel Magazine- Capturing the sports market is one of our target goals in order to increase midweek room nights. This magazine serves the sports-related travel and event industry. It is the only publication written and designed to serve the people who organ- ize and manage sporting events of all types and levels. This publication is read by more than 16,000 industry decision makers and should allow the CVB to get in front of those individuals who have the potential to book ideal business for our region. Walk Ins................. ...1,897 Room Night Bookings.............. ...93 Phone Calls............... .1,466 Media Inquiries..................... .....22 Email Requests........... ...322 FAM Tours/Trade shows........... ...1 Mail Orders.. ............ ...1,274 Events & Festivals.............. ..... .....2 Marketed Events.................... .282 AUGUST 2007 HIGHLIGHTS California Travel Research California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (July 2007) - California hotel occupancy slipped in July, averaging 76.5% statewide, down 1% below 2006. Room rates were 6.9% above July of last year. -Source: Smith Travel Research, CA lodging Industry Perrormance, Augusl2do7. Overseas & Mexican Visitors to California, Full Report 2006 now available - Highlights as reported last month: Approximately 4.6 million overseas visitors (21.3%) indicated California was a destination on their U.S. trip in 2006, down 3.7% from the 4.8 million overseas visitors to California in 2005. Source: GIC Research Inc., August 2007. California Domestic Travel Report, 2006 Executive Summary - The following excerpts are from newly received 2006 domestic visitor volume, market share, and trip characteristics from D.K. Shifflet & Associates: . California's share of the U.S. domestic travel market increased for the fourth consecutive year. California's market share not only increased, but also increased by a significant margin - jumping from 11.09% in 2005 to 11.50% in 2006 - representing the largest gain among the 50 states. · The 2006 travel year established another record for California's travel and tourism industry. California hosted an estimated 352.3 million visitors in 2006, representing a 5.1% increase over the 335.4 million U.S. residents that visited California in 2005. · California maintained it's ranking as the top destination in the U.S. in terms of person-stays market share and number of visitors. · Both leisure and business travel to California positively affected total travel volume in 2006. Leisure visitation increased 5.0% compared to 2005, while business travel grew 5.3% -- marking the third consecutive annual increase. California leisure visitors totaled 256.4 million in 2006 and business visitors totaled 95.9 million - both setting new record highs for California. Resident leisure travel was the primary driver behind the in-state gain, increasing by 7.7% over 2005's total of 279.8. Out-of-state travel to California declined from 55.5 million in 2005 to an estirnated 53.3 million in 2006 - the first such decline in recent years. The decline was driven by a 9.6% drop in non-resident leisure travel (Numbers are preliminary pending publication of the full report in early or mid-September). -Source: D.K. Shifflet & Associates, ltd., August 2007. Cultural Tourism Resource - The online database of the Centre for Cultural Policy Research (CCPR) at the University of Glascow, Scotland, is de- signed to assist those working or researching in the arts, culture and major events. Research themes include studies on the social and economic effects of: arts and culture; arts, culture and education; arts, culture and inclusion; arts and health; arts, culture and audience development; arts, culture and the economy; cultural tourism; major cultural events; and major sporting events, with an emphasis on research published since 2000. Family Travel Study - A new study by Harris Interactive commissioned by Best Western International finds that today's family vacations are shorter yet rnore elaborate and expensive, involving journeys to farther--particularly exotic--locations than what most people rememberfrorn their childhood, accord- ing to a new sUNey. Travelers are more likely to include pets in their trips over grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins. Eighty-eight percent of U.S. adults who take family vacations indicated that a getaway these days is different from when they were children. More than half (55%) claimed that today's vacations are more expensive, while just over two-fifths (42%) said they now travel greater distances. -Source: Best Western lntemational, 8/16/2007 Vacation Breaks Getting Shorter - The leisurely summervacation--long considered a chance for employees to break away from work for at least a full week, if not two--has fallen out of favor. Instead, says The Wall Street Journal, drawing from Expedia.com's annual Vacation Deprivation Study, many people are opting to break their vacation time into long weekends, according to researchers who track vacation patterns. Some employees are even combining their vacations with two- to three-day business trips to avoid being away from work at all. The study finds that earned vacation time often goes unused. Despite earning the least amount of annual vacation days, Americans will leave an average of 3 days unused-totaling more than 439 million in 2007. The trend has picked up as the work force has grown leaner. Another factor is the growth in the nurnber of dual-income couples, which has made it harder for people to coordinate their vacations. -Sources: Expedia.com; Wall Street Joumal, p.D1, August 15, 2007 Here We Grow... Come see us in our new office space! In August, the CVB moved into the suite directly across the from Chamber's Courtyard, Suite B. We now have adequate space to op- erate and offer a reception/lobby area of our own. If you are a member of the TVCVB, please feel free to drop by and bring your collateral. Hours of operation will be Mon- day-Friday from 9am-Spm. Look for an invitation to our Open House on Tuesday, December 4th at lOam. Branding Discovery Meeting In order to achieve strategic positioning and over- all brand recognition, the TVCVB, along with Miriello Grafico, will be conducting a Brand Discov- ery Meeting on Wednesday, September 19th. Se- lected individuals will meet to identify the key components needed to launch a successful brand identity campaign. The end result will yieid a new TVCVB identity, a style guide, new broadcast pro- duction/media placement and measurements. September 2007 Highlights Page 1 Great Response to "Temecula" at Local & Domestic Trade Shows The Motivation Show (9/25-27) The TVCVB ventured outside of Cali- fornia and attended the Incentive Travel & Meeting Executives Trade Show at the McCormick Place Convention Center in Chi- cago. This show is the world's largest collection of NEW ideas to stimulate sales, improve perform- ance, and reward service, More than 2,000 exhibits featured the most popular brand name mer- chandise, incentive travel and meeting destinations, gift cards, and online services, used in pro- grams to motivate employees, boost sales, and increase market share. The show attracted over 13,000 buyers, 30% of which have annual travel budgets of $100,000- $1 Million. Leslie Mercado and Steve Mallory of Pechanga Resort & Casino manned the booth and was visited by hundreds of Meet- ing Planners, Travel Agents & Company Executives interested in the Temecula Valley as a destina~ tion. Many qualified contacts were made at the show, and the sales staff is currently following up on leads from such companies as Abbott Laboratories, The Pam. pered Chef, Amgen, Allstate Insur~ ance and Wicks, California State Open Golf Cham~ pionship (9/2S) Team TVeVB played with one of the pros in the Pro-Am at Red Hawk Golf Course. As the oldest pro golf championw ship in the state, some of the best up-andwcoming players from around the world competed in this tournament. 'The eVB distributed visitor guides and winery maps at the check-in table. NFRW National Convention (9/28) Over 1,000 delegates from all over the US attended this event at the Palm Springs Convention Center. CVB Co-Chair, Val Skovroll, in- vited us to participate, where we distributed collateral and coordi- nated 5 wineries to provide wine tasting for the attendees. Partici- pating wineries were: Briar Rose, Maurice Carrie, VR La Cereza, Wilson Creek and Keyways. Spe- cial guests from the entertain- ment industry as well as Califor~ nia Republican Party leaders and elected officials and local digni- taries were among t1le crowd. Contacts were made with some meeting planners interested in bringing groups to T emecula. NBC Travel Expo (9/29-3()) Held at the San Diego Com'entiol1 Center, Pechanga invited us to partner at this show, It yielded 4,000 people and W(~ made good contacts Wit11 attendees and me- dia representatives (The Epoch Times-Chinese Newspaper, Golf and Wine Travel, Honeymoon Wishes, TIle Women's Travel Club and Tijuana Con Vis). Key Tourism Leaders Participate at Branding Discovery Meeting Along with Branding . partner, Miriello Grafico, the (VB held it's first Brand- . ing. Discovery Ses- sion in September. Key tourism leaders . attended and of- . fered tangible input and expertise from . their specific tour- ism industry experi- . ences. Following is . a list of individuals who participated: . City ofTemecula-Mayor Chuck Washington, Aaron Adams, Gloria Wolnick, Martin Betz eVB Board of Directors-Denis Ferguson, Doug Leiber, John Kelliher, Melody Brunsting, Katherine Bailey, Kelly Daniels, Steve Mallory, Cherise Manning, Carlos .Palma,KenWe-stmyer-,--Bi-Il-nWilsGn--- Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce-Alice Sullivan Pechanga Resort & Casino-Lorraine Cebollero Temecula Valley Winegrowers Assn,-Ray Falkner, Tomi Arbogast South Coast Winery Resort & Spa-Les Utley, Crystal Magan Old Town Temecula-Bonnie Reed CVB Staff-Kimberly Adams, Carrie Penny, Leslie Mercado, Carolyn Fittipaldi Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival The TVCVB was a proud sponsor for the Temecula Valley I nternational Film & Music Festival and hosted the VIP Hospital- ity Suite for the week of the event. Numerous guests were assisted with lodging, dining and recreational activity rec- ommendations. A film- maker site tour and a wine tasting tour were offered to visiting guests in an effort to introduce and educate those unfamiliar with our breath-taking valley. The CVB also sponsored a table at the Sunday night Gala Dinner at Pechanga Resort & Casino. Members of the CVB Board of Directors, staff and invited guests of the Temecula Valley Wine- growers Association were on hand to share in the rec- ognition and presentations to award-winning film mak- ers, producers and deserv- ing talent. California Travel Research Page 2 C~liforni~ Hotel OccuPency ~nd Room Rates (Augus! 2007) - California hotel occupancy rose one percent in August, a gain over the prior year and the prior month, but less than the 2.3% occupancy increase for the country as a whole. At the sub-region level, the trends were mixed. Oakland and other Bay Area markets reported gains, LA and Anaheim were up slightly, while most Central Valley areas were down. California room rates were 6.9% above August of last year. -Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Peliormance, September 2007. California Country Profiles - Visitation trends for overall and leisure.travel to California as well as party size, booking methods, spending and demographics are now available for the fOllowing countries and regions: Japan, Canada, U.K., Germany, Australia, Mexico (air), Chlna, India, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, South America, Middle East, Brazil, France, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Scandinavia, Spain, Sweden, Hong Kong; Philippines. -Source: GIG Research Inc., September 2007; Statistics Canada, September 2007. c.alifornia DomeslicTravel Report -Source: D.K. Shifflet & Associates, Ltd., September 2007. The 2006 travel year established another record for California's travel and tourism industry. California hosted an estimated 352.3 million visitors in 2006, representing a 5.1% increase over the 335.4 million U.S. residents that visited California in 2005. Both leisure and busi- ness travel to California positively affected total travel volume in 2006. Leisure visitation increased 5.0% compared to 2005, while busi- ness travel grew 5.3% n marking the third consecutive annual increase. California leisure visitors totaled 256.4 million in 2006 and busi- ness visitors totaled 95.9 million - both setting new record highs for California. California's travel and tourism industry out-perionned the U.S. in 2006. Total U.S. domestic visitation increased by 0.8% between 2005 and 2006 compared to California's growth of 5.1%. U$. leisure travel was flat (0.1%), while California's leisure visitation was up 5.0%. California's share of the U.S. domestic travel market increased for the fourth consecutive year. California's market share not only in- creased, but also increased by a significant margin - jumping from 11.09% in 2005 to 11.50% in 2006 - representing the largest gain among the 50 states. The increase was fueled by leisure and business travelers, both of which continued an upward trend. At 73%, leisure trips remained the dominate reasonforvisiting California. Visiting friends and relatives accounts for the largest share of leisure trips, especially for non-residents. The percentage of out-of-state leisure travelers visiting friends and relatives in California in~ creased from 35% in 2005 to 42% in 2006, due, perhaps, to high and rising average daily room rates for hotels. Average length of stay for overnight visitors decreased from 2.88 nights in 2005 to 2.81 nights in 2006 - continuing a generally downward trend. Average length of stay decreased virtually across the board for overnight visitors. Average length of stay declined from 4.44 nights to 4.15 nights for out-of-state leisure vjsitors~ Even with the decline, non-state leisure visitors have the longest stays among all visitor seg~ ments. California resident travel within the State showed one of the largest gains between 2005 and 2006 - increasing by 6.9% to 299.0 million. Resident leisure travel was the primary driver behindthein~state gain, increasing by 7.7% over 2005's t()tal of 279,8. However,in-state business travel also contributed to the increase - growing by 4.5% from 2005 to a total of 77.0 million. Out~of-state travel to California declined from 55.5 million in 2005 to an estimated 53.3 million in 2006 - the first such decline in recent years. The decline was driven by a 9.6% drop in non~resident leisure travel. While non-resident leisure travel declined between 200.5 and 2006, business travel to California increased by 8.3%. The gain, however, was not sufficient to offset the loss in non.resident leisure visita. tion. . . . . . . . Regional Marketing . In September the Inland Empire Tour- ism Council held their Strategic Meet- ing @ South Coast Winery Resort & Spa. Representatives from Ontario CVB, San Bernardino CVB, Lake Ar- rowhead CVB, Ramona Bowl and En- terprise Car Rental were some of the key individuals involved in the strate- gic planning and development of goais for regional branding. Kimberly Adams was appointed First Vice Chair to their Executive Board and will continue to represent Temecula Valley as a top- tier, premier destination. . The California Travel and Tourism Commission (CTTC) has developed a 5-year Strategic Marketing Plan that includes Rural Tourism as part of the program to support their do- mestic marketing efforts. River- side County and, subsequently, Temecula Valley is considered rural and part of the program. The plan includes the integration of three key components: Rural Tourism, California Welcome Cen- ters and CuituralfHeritage Tour- ism. An objective of the plan is for the CTTC to pa rtner with gate- way and urban cities (including San Francisco, LA, San Diego, Monterey, Santa Barbara and Ontario) and to re-brandf reposi- tion the experiences of rural Cali- fornia. Walk Ins................. ...2,198 Room Night Bookings............. ....103 Phone ,Calls............... .1,848 Media Inquiries..................... .........36 EmailRequests........... ...282 FAM Tours/Trade shows................5 Mail Orders." ............ ...2,077 Events & Festivals........"..... ......... ...3 Ma.rketed Events.................... .301 eVB Upcoming Events . 10/10-10/13 Temecula Rod Run, Old Town Temecula . 10/30 CITe j\Jedia Event, Beverly Hills . 11/17 San Diego Bay \X-'ine & Food Classic, San Diego . 11/29-30 Travel Media Show- case Post FAM, Temecula . 12/4 TVCVB Open House, ~:faill Office . 12/5 CalSAE Seasonal Spectacular Trade Show, Sacramento Page 1 "California is the #1 destina- tion in the US, generating $93.8 billion in direct travel spending for California's economy." -Caroline Be- teta, Executive Director for the CITC. Wine Club Promotion Bill Wilson speaking at San Diego CVB FAM Tour. October Quarterly Meeting and Luncheon On Wednesday, October 3rd, the TVCVB held its Quarterly Meeting at the beautiful Wilson Creek Winery. CVB Chairman of the Board, Denis Fergu- son, welcomed the group and Ray Falkner, President of the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association, expressed his excitement about the strategic partner- ship wnh the TVCVB. We also had the honor of hav- ing Caroline Beteta, Ex- ecutive Director for the California Travel and Tour- ism Commission and Dep- uty Secretary for Tourism, California Business, Trans- portation & Housing Divi- sion, be our guest speaker. Some of the CTTC's find- ings included California as the #1 destination in the US, generating $93.8 bil- lion in direct travel spend- ing for CA's economy. There is a Wine & Food Tourism Trend, where 40% of leisure travelers self- identify as traveling to learn about or enjoy unique and memorable eating and drinking experiences. Their Branding Initiative includes communicating CA's core attributes and compelling poi nt-of-diffe re n ce (California attitude, desir- able eclectic lifestyle and unique cultures and diver- Current Promotional Programs Some of the current promo- tional programs that the TVCVE has put in motion include the Wine Club Members Weekday Get- away Postcard that offers a special discounted weekday room rate at our local hotels to wine club members when they travel to Temecula Val- ley Wine Country to retrieve their monthly wine ship- ment. Another new pro- gram is Capture the Ma~c of the Holidays Discount Shoppinli' & Dining Card that will be offered exclu- sively in Old Town Temec- ula to encourage locals and visiting guests to do their holiday shopping and din- ing in Old Town and receive 10% off at all participating merchants. The program will take effect starting on Friday, November 23rd and run through Sunday, Janu- ary 6th, 2008. All participat- Media News and FAM Tours On Wednesday, October 3rd, we had a visit from the KNBC News Team of Colleen Wil- liams and Fritz Coleman. Broadcasting live from Old Town Temecula, the Channel 4 News covered various seg- ments on Wine Country, Pechanga, Old Town, Eco- nomic Development, Housing and Weather. The 1VCVB assisted the news team with statistical information and some history about the Te- macula Valley. On Friday, October 5th, the 1VCVB was asked to partner with Destina- tion Temecula on a FAM Tour consisting of representatives from the San Diego CVB. They were given the royal treatment and experienced sity). Their proposed ad- vertising budget should reach $18.5 million for 07/08. Caroline also shared the Rural Tourism Strategic Plan, which is a program to extend aware- ness of the eight rural tour- ism marketing regions (Inland Empire is one of them) by building the brand, research, product development, technology and partnership! collaboration. A great big Thank You to Caroline Be- teta and to Wilson Creek Winery for providing a wonderful venue, superb cuisine and excellent cus- tomer servicel ing merchants will display a cling-on in their store win- dow indicating that they are a supporter and partner in the program. These strategic marketing efforts are part of the bigger plan to not only unite our local tourism enti- ties, but to also enhance the tourism industry partner- ships that will allow us to brand position the Temecula Valley on a regional scale. our lodging facilities, Wine Country . Old Town and Pechanga. On Tuesday, Octo- ber 30th, 1VCVB staff at- tended a CITC Media Event In Los Angeles. They distributed Temecula Valley story ideas to writers and journalists and the CVB booth even won an honorary award for best deco- rated booth displayl California Travel Research California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (September 2007) _ California hotel occupancy fell 2.4% in September compared to 2006. Average room rates were 5.9% higher. Of the 26 sub- markets monitored by Smith Travel Research, only five Bay Area markets reported occupancy gain over last year's banner numbers. ~Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Performance, October 2007. Moderate Growth Forecast for U.S. Travet in 2008 - Nearly all U.S. travel industry sectors are expected to see moderate growth in 2008, according to forecasts issued at the Travel Industry Associa- tion's Marketing Outlook Forum in Charlotte, North Carolina. While 2007 domestic leisure travel is pro- jected to finish at 2.7% above.2006, next year will show less of an increase, at 2.0%, Business travel will be flat. International travel is expected to increase 3.7% in 2008. -Source: Suzanne Cook, TIA 2007 Marketing Outlook Forum, October 2007. U.S. Economic Outlook- . U.S. economy is beginning to slow down. . Falling housing prices and. residential construction create drag on investment and growth - not expected to improve over the next six months. . Financial market volatility because of past history of lax lending standards is further cause for con- cern. Mortgage debt has been widely used as collateral ("asset-backed commercial paper"), and many institutions now vulnerable. . Gas prices to stay high, may influence more closer-to.home travel, but no longer seen as threat unless $3.50/gallon "tipping poinf' is reached. . Low personal savings rate means that U.S. households do not have much margin of safety. . Actual disposable income has stayed positive. . Despite housing market collapse, consumer confidence has held up fairly well. -Source: John Walker, Oxford Economics, TIA 2007 Marketing Outlook Forum. October 2007. TVCVB Open House at New Main Office Please join the Temecula Valley Convention & Visi- tors Bureau staff as we celebrate our new office space with an Open House on Tuesday, De- cember 4th at 1O:00am. We will also be initiating our office with a Ribbon Cutting by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Com- merce. We are excited to have a place to "officially" call our own and to provide an addi- tional location for travel resources and visitor in- formation. While you're here, enjoy some festive holiday treats and good- ies and enter to win a special TVCVB prize package. We would like to thank our dedicated tourism partners the City of Temecula, Pechanga Development Corpora- tion and Pechanga Re- sort & Casino, our TID Lodging Facilities, our Board of Directors and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. With6ut the support and encouragement of these entities, we would not be where we are today, and for that we are ex- tremely grateful. Our new office is located at 26790 Ynez Ct., Suite B, Temecula, right next door to the TVCC. We hope to see you on De- Cember 4th! Upcoming Events and Meetings . . . . . . . . . . Tuesday Saturday Wed/Thu FrijSat Tuesday Wednesday Tuesday Tuesday Thursday Tuesday 11/13 11/17 11/28 & 29 11/30 & 12/1 12/4 12/5 12/U 1/15 1/24 1/29 TVCVB Board Meeting TVCC Conference Room San Diego Bay Wine & Food Classic San Diego Travel Media Showcase Palm Springs Travel Media Showcase-Post FAM Temecula TVCVB Ribbon CuttingfOpen House TVCVB Main Office CalsAE Seasonal Spectacular Sacramento TVCVB Holiday Board Meeting Baily's Restaurant TVCVB Board Planning Session Weins Family Cellars 3rd District Econ. Dev. Forum Pechango Resort&Casino TVCVB Customer Service Training Locatlon-TBD Page 2 "9 out of 10 vaca. tion travelers use the Web at some point of the travel planning process. (15% do it all online)." -Source: The Ideal American Vacation Trip, Phase 11, TIAjAmerican Express, T1A 2007 Market- ing Outlook Forum, Octo- ber2007. PAGE November 2007 Highlights ~==-===~==--====== <jP~ ""'-" =~ ,= """'''' 7:1:.'''' <.= =:;; = = ~"'''' l"=,> <'""~ "'"'i> \ ~ , I ~ m I Travel Media Showcase Trade Show and Post FAM Tour i i I I I South Coast Winery Resort & Spa Head ~ Wine Maker, John MacPhearson speaking ". to Media/Journalist Reps. j Journalists enjoying wine tasting at Ponte Family Estate Winery. From November 27-29, the TVCVB sponsored a booth at the Eighth Annual Travel Media Showcase at Morongo Casino near Cabazon. This show offered a unique opportu- nity for top travel journalists and travel industry professionals to meet individually, at a single location, for the purpose of exchanging information and developing personal contacts. We participated in one-on-one appoint- ments with 35 journalists, who consisted of editors, staff and freelance travel wrners, magazine and newspaper travel writers, broadcast travel journal- ists and internet travel journalists. Some of the publications that they write for are: AAA Maga- zine, San Francisco Chronicle, Destination Weddings and Honey- moons, NCGA Magazine, Fairways & Greens Maga- zine, Ventura Star, Santa Cruz Sentinel, Live Well Magazine, Discov- erSD.com, Coast to Coast Magazine, Saveu'r, Travel World Magazine, Sunset Magazine, Newstalk 920 KPSI, Spa Magazine, The Antique Trader, Better Home and Gardens, Suc- cessful Meetings, Luxury Travel, Group Tour Maga- zine, Small Market Meet- ings, Westways and Dal- las Morning News. We presented story ideas, San Diego Bay Wine & Food Classic Kimberly and Carolyn dazzled the attendees of the show. press releases and T e- mecula Valley collateral to national media represen- tatives. On November 30 and December 1: the CVB was invited to participate in a posl FAM tour for pre- registered media repre- sentatives. Over the two days, the group of eieven journalists were treated to a glimpse of the beautiful Temecula Valley by stay- ing at the T emecula Creek Inn and partaking in a gourmet wine-pairing din- ner. They also experi- enced the wine-making process with the assis- tance of John MacPher- son, head winemaker at South Coast Winery Re- sort & Spa where they learned some interesting facts about the art of wine. They visited Ponte Family Estate Winery for some wine tasting and then headed into Old Town for some shopping and site seeing. They also were given the grand tour at Pechanga Resort & Ca- sino showing the variety of dining, gaming and entertainment options. 9 wineries from Temecula Valley Wine Coun- try helped give great presence at the event. On Saturday, November 17, staff participated for the flrsttime in the san Diego Bay Wine and Food Classic. In attendance were over 5,000 wine and food aficionados and over 160 wineries from wine growing regions from around the world. More than 700 different types of wine were ,. "- '''" poured at the event including wine from nine wineries from the Temecula Valley Wine Coun- try. 30 gourmet food companies and 60 of san Diego's top res- taurants and chefs were on hand to Impress the guests with gourmet cuisine and treats. The average age of visitors were between 30-50 years old and the average household Income ranged between $75,000- $250,000 annually. Staff was pleased to hear that many of the visiting guests were familiar with the Temecula Valley and the unique setting It has to of- fer. i i i i I i Journalists enJoy a visit to Old i Town Temecula. i i ! I I I I I I I I Jim Carter from South Coast ill Winery Resort & Spa enllght- ill ened the group on the many m special features at the Resort. I I I ! i I I I ~ I I I I I ~ . ! ~ "'-'Z! !iEfl' a..,.;;'" ""'-'" ~~ "'=~ """"" """''' =,. ","", """'" <= = = = ="" = """"" """'==""""'=""""'=e'",,",J=="'~ ".# California Tra.yeLRe&e.arch PAGE 2 California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (October 2007) - California hotel occupancy for the month of October was a roo bust 71.9%, considerably higher than the U.S. average rate of 66.7%, and exceeding by a slight margin the 2006 level. Average room rates were 6.6% over last year. The Anaheim, Los Angeles/Long Beach and San Jose/Santa Cruz areas reported double- digit RevPAR gains. ~Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Pertormance, November 2007. Mexican Travel to California, 2006 - California and other border states all struggle with the common dilemma of how to measure and report Mexican visitation. Air arrival estimates are available, thanks to the U.S. Office of Travel and Tourism Industries and their vendor, CIC Research Inc., and these are judged to be statistically sound. Unfortunately, there is no consistent source of data on Mexican land travelers, leaving a huge gap in our understanding of the size and importance of the Mexican market. The San Diego region is probably the California region that benefits most from Mexican tourism, and has undertaken extensive re- search. At the request of the CTTC, and drawing heavily on the San Diego efforts, CIC Research Inc. has prepared the following California statewide estimates: Mexican land travelers = 7,640,000 (4,570,000 Day Visitors & 3,070,000 Overnight) and Air travel- ers :::: 470,000 for a total of 8,110,000. -Source: CIC Research Inc., November 2007. Strong Canadian Interest in California Travel Confirmed by September Survey - Responses to a recent Canadian survey (online panel of Canadian adults 18 and over, representative of Canadian geographic and demographic distribution) indicate that 11 % of online Canadians have vis~ed Cal~omia within the past two years. The percentage jumps to 14% for Alberta residents, and 26% for B.C. Custom questions added by the CTTC to gage the prospect of expanded tourism from Canada show a surprisingly strong potential from Eastem Canada Combining recent past vis~ors and those expressing likelihood in visiting Califomia in the next few years puts ''potential visitors" from Ontario at 32 percent. Most important trip planning research: scenic roads and highways, restaurants and dining, beaches, and shop- ping. -Source: OataPath SystemsJDufferin Research/ZINC Research, October '07. ,-~=~~~=~~~=~~~-===-==-~~~, '\ \ . Dear Distinguished Members: ! I As 2007 comes to a close all of us at the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau are taking time to reflect on what a very I successful year it has been. 1 am personally grateful for the dedication, productivity and passion of our amazing team at the TVCVB. I Their commitment and implementation of our Tourism strategic plan has us well positioned for another exceptional year in 2008. The , evidence is clear: I I ~ An Upward Trend - Tamecula Valley's hotel occupancies have trended positively in 2007 and have continued to outpace national ~ !:! and state trends. Ii i We've Grown - We successfully recruited two key Manager Positions and expanded a focused Sales and Marketing effort for our I I partners and the Tourism community. In all we attended and hosted more than 25 key trade shows and familiarization trips including i being a major feature in the prestigious Travel Industry Association's International Pow Wow Tradesh9w in April. i Partnerships M The TVCVB launched several new key targeted marketing promotions. One of ma~;'examPles was a new "drive- I I market" program launched in the summer with billboard presence on the 1-10 /1-215 freeways next to Pechanga representation. Also I in partnership with The Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association a colorful banner program was unveiled at the Fashion Valley ! Mall. Both of these major initiatives encouraged people to play, stay, taste, shop, golf, dine and explore the Temecula Valley. I ~ Showcasing Temecula - In March we opened the doors to a new interactive visitor's center in Old Town Temecula to display TeM E I macula Valley's unique features and amenities to numerous visitors. It also serves to provide reservation services the numerous & hotels and restaurants while providing valuable information on the many special event and festival offerings in our region. I Educate - In May we presented the Temecula Tourism Impact Study which outlined that Tourism and recreation plays a vital role in I J the Temecula regional economy with more than half a billion dollars in visitor spending generated in 2006, a four-fold increase from I six years earlier. This positioned tourism as a key player to the economic development viability of our region. I ' I 11 We've Grown Again M Our growth moved us to new offices in August, adjoining the Temecu_la Valley Chamber of Commerce's of- ! fi: ficas on Ynez Court. Our new headquarter also serves as a second visitor center. I A New Vision M The TVCVB initiated a major branding initiative to achieve strategic positioning and overall brand recognition for I . Temecula Tourism. We launched the effort in August with a branding discovery session which was attended by Key Tourism leaders I including our Directors and Staff, The City of Temecula, Pechanga, Wine Country, Old Town, and Chamber representatives to name ! a few. This initiative and program continues in the 4th quarter of 2007 with anticipated results to be released in early 2008. I i Service First - The TVCVB will have serviced well over 75,000 tourism related inquiries by year's end. Our team also will have ~ served over 200 media inquiries, marketed to approximately 3,300 event inquiries and represented Temecula in 28 Festivals and ~ Events. A new high was achieved in all categories. I 9 The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau has certainly seen an exceptional year. This would not be possible without the ! I unwavering support of our tourism partners and the contribution and endless positive energy of the volunteers and the many dedi- ~ cated individuals who serve on our board. Together we do make a difference! Thank you for making it a great year for all of us. !l m Happy Holidays to all. We look forward to sharing the prosperity that a new year has to offer with friends and neighbors and making i new acquaintances with all that visit our Temecula Valley. I Respectlully. I Denis Ferguson ~ Chairman of the Board. TVCVB j \. "Look for the NCVB's new Quarterly Newsletter that will keep you up-to.date on regional tourism and cve happenings M .I " debuting in March 2008. , ~====~~===~=-=-=--=-~--=-- I' Chairman's Letter (from TVee January 2007 Newsletter) DECEMBER 2007 HIGHLIGHTS PAGEl CalSAE Seasonal Spectacular Draws Festive Crowd Carolyn Fittipaldi, Connie Smith, Leslie Mercado and Vangie Esteban representing Temecula Valley at the Seasonal Spectacular. The TVCVB, along with members of the Temecula Creek Inn and Em- bassy Suites Hotel Temecula Wine Country sales teams, attended the California Society of Association Ex- ecutives Seasonal Spectacular on Wednesday, December 5th in Sacramento. Dawned with their colorful red vests, the team captured the attention of visiting planners and opera- tors who were there to learn about new and unique desti- nations for their upcoming meeting schedules. CalSAE is the third largest home to associations in the nation and the Seasonal Spectacular is considered the largest Asso- ciation Industry trades how on the west coast. Our decora- tive booth was visited by hun- dreds of meeting planners and direct contacts were made throughout the show. CVB staff is currently qualifying and per- forming follow-up communications with both short-term and long-term leads ob- tained at the event. The booth was "decked" with holiday decor and Temec- ula Valley ornaments as giveaways. TID Lunch Puts Hotels in the Holiday Spirit The TVCVB thanked the TID Lodging Partners for a successful 2007 by hosting a holiday lunch at the new Frankie's Restaurant in T emecula. "We are very fortu; nate to have such forward-thinking, community-minded hotel partners within our city and this was just one way to show our appreciation," said Kimberly Adams, TVCVB President &0 CEO. Year ending 2007, TID funding will have pro- jected to conttibute over $425,000 in marketing dollars to help promote, market and brand our destination. Kimberly also stated that "Positive feedback has been the common thread in regards to the formation of the District and it has proven to be a solid foundation for regional toutism growth and stability." New Office Ribbon Cutting and Open House Thank you to those who at- tended our exciting ribbon cut- ting and open house for our new offices. About fifty eVB and Chamber members joined in the festivities and got a glimpse of our much needed space. We are grateful for the support and encouraged for a bright and exciting new year ahead. . Walk Ins.......................................2,262 Room Night Bookings.........................25 Phone Calls. ....... ... .... ...... .... ....... ..1 ,987 Media Inquiries............................. .....39 Email Requests.... ... ......... ..... ....... ...298 FAM Tours/Trade shows.......................2 Mail Orders...................................1 ,804 Events & Festivals...............................2 Marketed Events....................... ..... ...242 CALIFORNIA TRAVEL RESEARCH PAGE 2 California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (through November 2007) - California hotel occupancy in November was a scant 0.8% above 2006. Average room rates were 7.1 % higher. Most submarkets were down compared to last year, although San Fran- cisco, Oakland, and San Diego showed strong increases. -Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Performance, December 2007. Social Media Sites Influence Online Purchase Decisions - According to the PhoCusWright Travel 2.0 Consumer Technology Sur- vey, while active shoppers visit multiple sites to compare prices, they are also motivated by a desire to read traveler reviews, research destinations and purchase tickets to events and attractions. Other findings: 1) The majority of travelers visit between two and five Web sites when shopping for travel online, and the number one reason for doing this is to compare prices; 2) At the same time, nearly 20% of travelers visit six or more sites-and this group of active shoppers possesses some distinctive characteristics that should pique the interest of commoditization-weary travel companies; 3) This group is more likely to visit non-transactional travel sites, in- cluding travel search engines, review sites and sites that offer rate analytics (e.g., Farecast); 4) Compared to the 75% of travelers who visit two to five sites, active shoppers are more familiar with Web 2.0 technologies overail and are more likely to find Travel 2.0 offerings, Including podcasts, traveler reviews and videos, influential in making travel purchasing decisions. -Source: Cathy Schetz- Ina, PhoCusWright FYI, 12/20/07 Arts & Economic Prosperity - In the national impact study, researchers coilected detailed expenditure and attendance data from 6,080 nonprofit arts and culture organizations and 94,478 of their attendees to measure total industry spending. Glendale and Walnut Creek were among twenty-five communities studied. Researchers also found: 1) Nationaily, the nonprofit arts and culture industry generates $166.2 biilion in economic activity annuaily-a 24% increase in just the past five years: 2) The typical arts event attendee spends $27.79 per person, per event, in addition to the cost of admission. Nonlocal audiences spend twice as much as their local counterparts ($40.19 vs. $19.53). -Source: Summary Report, Arts & Economic Prosperity, Americans for the Arts, 2007. Annual Customer Service Training Seminar with Focus on I Keys to Unlocking Hospitality Recruiting J Mark you caiendar for the TVCVB's upcom- ing Annual Customer Service Training Seminar to be held on Tuesday, January 29th from 11 :30am-1 :30pm at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. This will be the third annual session offered to the members and local community with a complete focus on providing exceptional customer service. Speaker Jan Smith, of Inland Management Group, will highlight the crucial points and key opportunities when it comes to hiring staff members and team leaders. Finding the right people and then offering the best customer service training may just set your business a step 3.u1 q)Wiuct &e<momic q)~ ~ow.m On Thursday, January 31", 2008, the Riverside County Economic Develop- ment Agency, the Menifee Valley Chamber of Commerce and the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau will present the Third District Economic Development Forum featuring keynote speakers Supervisor Jeff Stone, along with Robin Zimpfer, Assistant County Executive OfflcerjEDA. To be held at Pechanga Resort & Casino from 7:30am - 10:00am. The forum will highlight Supervisor Stone's accomplishments as well as his vision for the future. Robin Zimpfer of the EDA will discuss agency activity countywide and will address its goals and mission for the upcoming year. This memorable break- fast event is anticipated to draw over 600 guests. Opportunities for sponsor- ships are available. For more Information on sponsorships or tickets to the event, please contact the TVCVB at 951-491-6085 or email us at info@temeculacvb.com. above the rest. The type of experience that your customer receives (from the mo- ment they come in contact with your team member) is highly dependent upon some basic customer service skills that can work for you and your business if practiced daily. This informative session is sure to renew your customer service vision and hopefuily introduce some new techniques that may be applied to your daily opera- tions immediately. " interested in attend- ing, please contact the CVB's main office at (951) 491-6085 or email us at info@temeculacvb.com. We hope to see you there. "';,,-:<=, ~ Econom, il:: De1-eJOj)lB(!JJtAgeocy' Forum & BrellkflKt FUIldmisl:rb.mcfiting M<mitbt:: \h]/eI.-Chamber ofComm<.'TC<:& li::me<::nln v.d~' Com:~tiQn IU1d Vi\'it<mlBureau ~31.2tJlJ8 ~ 7,:l{Ja.m.. HI:OO"-Dl, ~it;.;c,-;:_," ~ ~~~=:~~~'" ,..",,,- ~]' T.......'<"Ula.c""~~n . S3:Sil'I:ld"""""a.-$.50"'d_.S_'b;p<4t..,,,.~itltlle_......,b<.:I""~ v....t.v...,,<JWlJol.>>..."""" =""""@S3~_P<"'= '..... nl'o"~oldlil:"'"""""~r,,,,sr=-'li's!,OO()'-or~p<"!'k _, 1""- I,W~ ,,~old lit~ ',;,1>0 '" )>,,,,,,,,,,,S-ron= ..ff- '12."'", r", ~""'Ofk _\eo, l.'\""'...o~ hlo '" he ,"-"'''-l~,,!,'''''.r.i'' S~..-,(,,, fi>1 ~ J'COvk _ y..., 1-"",,,, '",...I<II!I.r '" \>.. ,~I.l..,;o;p:d ~"""'''' 4 .~v..'" r,-~ ~ p,,'t1o 141-1I.1;:,"QaI~IiI:<:"''''''''''':o''''''$I'<'''''-'"2$)(,.''''''f<o.r16'''''''p",_ ~~:._---~~=-:.~~.~.:~~~~~,~~~'-~~~~~= 'rol<!>b= __.____~______R~_"_.______._____~___ _0<<1>_" Ri'tenldeCollllt), .E<-nnoonk-De.-dupR1/!tit '\eo:n<y l'Il~M_".,,,\,~ 1:iv~c;"",s;., ~,..._.\);>/l",,",l>.Fo;\'''''''~~''''' ,..------."'.......-. ......,..""... 05 0_ c_t1i11 ".."'0...., __ ,."'----- .-- ......"'"-"'='-. ---...,......_~......_.. ..g............-....",.,,_.... ""'''''''''.."'''"'-'~~''"'''....._'''--,...~......"''-, SECTION 2 SECTION 2 Temecula Valley 2007-2008 Media Plan PublicalionIWebsiteJEventfTradeshow J" Feb March April Leisure CoaslMagazine Los Angeles Magazlne Inland Empire Magazine Inland Empire Melro Palm Springs life Sunset Budget Travel CalilorniaDrives CA Official Visilors Guide SoulhwestAirlinesSpir~ Sunset Wine Club GoIIPrinl-TBD WeslWays AnaheimlOrange County Visijor Guide SprotsTravel Idyllwildliving SO Home & Gardens Travel Hosl NewsDaDers OCRegisler LA Times Meetinas Smart Meetings MeetingsWesl Meeting News Association News HSMAI SD North Meeting Planners Online Soulhwesl Featured Desllnallon* Gollonline USA Today Meetings Online Ads. TBD SianatureEventMarkelina Spring Rod Run InlernationalPowWow Baloon&WineFestival InlernationalJazzFeslival InlernalionFllm&MusicFestival Fall Rod Run Trade Show Marketina leisure Meetings Markel Food&Wine Media Outdoor Fashion Valley Ig way 1 board 10-215 Freeway 1f8l200a Me, June July Au, Sept 0,1 N" Deo Tucked llWQ}' in sunnySouihemColifomia, TemeculliYolley offers a perfect blend of ruial charm 0I1d. melropll~ton excileriJenl for vocolillners and busi- nessfravelersalike. Thisolluring~hollliqliedeslinaljlln" offers 20+ aword- winning wineries, 24-hourgaming and enterlllinment, severo! (hampion ship golf courses olld o tosfe of the old west in ilshislorir Old Town disfrict. Coupled with feature-rich ocrommodafions and group fotilities, brand nome shopping in an edecliclllmosphereond diverseyeor-round wllurol eve nls, Temewln Yalley is the perfect place to mix business 11I1d pleasure. Tucked away in sunny Southern Californio, TemlKulo Volley offers II perfect blend of rurol cllDITD III1d melroplllilan excilemenl for vllcalioners and b usl- nesstrovelersolike. This alluring "bolllique destinalion" offers 20+ aword- winningwinenes, 24.hourgaming and enlerloinmenl,severol (hampionsh ip galfcourses and 0 losfe of the old wesf in ifs hislorirOldTown dislrict. Coupledwilh feoture-rich occommodolians and group fadlmes,brond no me shopping in on ederticatmosphere olld diverse yeor.raund wltural ev ents, Tememlo Valley is fhe perfect plore to mix business ond pleasure. lsf odin series 2nd ad in series Mllde 2 versions aflhis lid. FullPog. Oub O(.AD, O( Yi,Ror, Guid. 1/2 and 1/4 (an,t, Idyllwild, Inland Empire Mogazi". los Angeles Mogozine, Palm Springs life,Sondiego-Home & Garden, SonddiegnMogozine, WesfWays 1/2 ond 1/4 Palm Springs life, Sondiego-Home & Gorden, Wesl Ways 1!8pageod Sunset MoglJZine Wine-Twenty plus wineries produce O~lIfd.Winnin~prflmill~ wines mode possible by II unIque miuodimllle Spend the doywlindering fromvineYllrd 10 vineYlIrd or hop Ofl o tour busond lei someone else do the driving. Culture-Artsondwllurolprogromsoreovoiloble,forbothoduhsond[hirdren. Arfgoffetyshows, jazzfes!ivols,museums, concertsllndthealricolproduclions ore offered fouppeol to people of 1111 oges and inte.reslt FindorfsondCllhu fe indool'S,outdoorsondthroughouttheTemerolaVoUey. Goff-The TemewloVoIley bollSls 153 holesond seven mll~piDnship aiurses, which fea!uresomeofthebesldesignsondmaslinlrigui"!lfui(Wllys.Loakingfaryour best gome of goW? Seormnomnw. .. you've faund it! The Temeculo VoUey. Enlerfoinmnet-WllhsomeofthebeslsJmwsood mn~, the Temewlo Volley is quiddy beCllmill!l 0 hnlspntfurfop Nofterthe5llngoesdownl" Find everything from famous DIIllIe headlines lohlroltolent. Wb~ther i1'ssoft jazz, munlfy Dr the hntlesldonce musk, there's snmefldng roreyeryone. Playing in the Temewlo VoIleyhosneverbeenPlnrefun. This flllllring "bouliqtie desiinlllion"offers20+oword-winningwineries, 24.hourgomingondenlerfoinmenl,severol championship golf [ours eslindo tasteofthealdwestinitshislori[OldToWndisfrict. 1/3 Rod Run Colender ond Progrilm Coupled with feoture-rich ocmmmodotioll5 TemeCllJII Volley is the perfeel ploteto slay ond [ruise. NOlfjnolArf 1/8 lATimes Full Poge ods. FIIUPoge All AbDUl jou, Downbeat The Temerula Volley offers world-doss fotilm~s, hole~. and "menilies in an lInforgelfobleofmosphereglloronleedtoinspireyollrolldiencesfromsllnrise fosunsel.Forpersonolossislonceinuellfingofresh,movingllieelingllxperi- ence,ronloct us 01 the Temeculo Volley Convention & Visitors Burllautoday . We look forward to your coUJ Water Ways Musem program. Whelheryoll want fo ploy olone, with family or friends, the Tamewlo Vollay hos all the exdlemenlyou rould oskforunder fhe worm Californio sun. TemerolaVolley-Theploceyollwonltoploy. 1/2 WolerwoysAd WOler Ways Musem program. 1/4 OC Regislo~ Los Angelos TImes Lisl of all Temewla Hotels The Temewlo Visilor Center-iI's simply fhe beslploco fosforf exploring Temerolo. We ore open seven doys o week offering on array of information resources and services, 011 desfgned to mnke your sIny in Temerolo onefo remember. 1/16 Temecula Valley Mop Guide (auh up on spoolllevenfs,gel insfantinfo, pick up brornures, make reservations for dining and Irnlging, and leom about the cily's hisfory, oris, neighborhoods, and shopping~1I in one mnvenient looolion in Old Town. TemewlaHofelAd FuIlP,g. OCTRAVEl SHOW m6;~:Stay, : ,:t i-i~'j.~.lPlaYI ~'i'- '--Relax... .--. ~.K ~ "II -~,'- .., :./ -<-"-Ii'!'? ~ =---== Tf1\1EGUL>. VAl.UY ~ > ~ . . Billbon,dud 215 ond101WY Water Ways Musem program. (olifomioWelmmecenfer 3040 Whether you wonl to ploy alone, with fDmi~ or friends, the Tememlo Valley hnsulltheexdfemenfyou{Ouldoskforunder1heworln(oHforniosun. Temecu!nVulfey-Thepluceyollwnnlfoploy. FoshillnValleyMoll ~SDndeigo 84"x30" FusbionVull,yMull TemecuJo Valley Convenlion ondVisilOrs Bureou Wine lubel 1/16 Promotionllern Visilor Cenler Punnels 5'xlO' Visilllr(enler 2007 Rod Run Poster/Moiler 5.5"x 5.5" Also induded 5 inserts. Temerulll Volley Internotionol Film ond Musk FestivlIl Invite. Also indudedS inserts. S.5"x 5.5" Filminduslry POW-WOW Banners 33"xll7" Powwowollendees SECTION 3 Just east of LA isa $weep of heartland~the Inlend Empire. Mountains and deserts echo with Old West history and Hollywood's hideaways. Map out your visit to include San Bernardino County's gllaint mountain communities, Redland's historic driving tour, Temecula's wineries and antique stores, and downtowl1 Riverside's hIstoric Mission Inn. On yourway,experience great deals at the Ontario and Barstow Outlet Malls. You will find Rancho Cucamonga's new Victoria Gardens Regional Mall and Culturai Center along finger-snapping Route 66. Take to the air in a balloon, play 18 holes of golf, or try your luck at our Vegas-style casinos. Hike, bike or ski alpine terrain, wander Calico Ghost Town, br9wse art galleries and experience California's Official Outdoor Play, "Ramona" in Hemet. Grab your keys and hit the road~there are In partnership with the California Travel and Tourism Commission and the Inland Empire Tourism Council members - giving Chuck Vasquez, who backed the tax, a significantly larger plurality than they gave Paul Marchand, who opposed it. Go figure. In Indian Wells, incumbent Council- man Ed Monarch topped the vote count, and Patrick Mullany won the open council seat. But voters' adoption (by 82.5 percent!) of Measure P is of special interest. This is a trailblazing transient occupancy tax ordinance designed to fit the hot new hotel industry category of condominium (or condo) hotels. Among other topics, it specifically addresses owner-investors who choose to occupy their own units for more than 60 days in any given year - a category not covered by existing TOT ordinances. Given valley cities' dependence on bed tax revenue and the imminence of condo- hotel developments here, Measure P will likely serve as model (starting point) legislation for alL To us, Palm Desert provided the val- ley's most interesting municipal election - partly because it illustrates that city's unusual civic culture and partly because it shows this culture starting to break apart. The two incumbents up for re- election, Councilwoman Jean Benson and Mayor Jim Ferguson, faced only token opposition and won by typically mammoth pluralities. With one fairly recent exception (a truly singular case), by our calculation the last time any Palm Desert incumbent lost a re-election bid was in 1980. That's 26 years m Wow! They always win, they serve forever, they govern superbly, and they spend very lit- tle on campaigning. (This time around, Ms. Benson spent less than $200.) But November's real battle there was for the remaining two years of a vacated council term. The two candidates, Sabhy Jonathan and Cindy Finerty; didn't seri- ously differ on policies; hoth had long local histories and impressive public ser- vice records, particularly Mr. Jonathan. Their campaigns were intense, occasion- ally testy, and by Palm Desert norms hugely expensive, probably $50,000- $80,000 each when final reports are filed. The race seemed to be a dead heat, but it ended in a I3-point Finerty victory. All sides agree that the sitting council members' strong endorsement of her was the deciding factor. Only Ms. Benson kept to the tradi- tional standard: silence. Historically, Palm Desert's elected officials never issued public endorsements, regardless of their private views. That would con- flict with council collegiality; a rigorously practiced concept of which they've always been very proud. But they were angry with Mr. Jonathan and were will- ing to break their own rules to beat him. It doesn't augur well. Neither does the cost oflast fall's municipal campaigns. Yet how can Palm Desert expect to remain exempt from this contemporary bane? The city is now so big that only long-serving incumbents can rely on reputation alone to win the day. And so, Nov. 7 saw Palm Desert poli- tics beginning to resemble those of other cities. They call this normality, and there are worse fates. www.palmspringslife.com January 2007 I Palm Springs Life 139 ily-and noting with some ambivalen~e that time hasn't quite stood stilI: Apupuseria has replaced the Taco Bell. A curious reader can spot the novel's streets and landmarks in the southern corner of Colton, but ask Map- Quest for Agua Mansa (the name translates as ustiII water"), and the program draws a blank. Fittingly. In Espinoza's Southern Cali- fornia, as in Mexican American experience itself, identity and its documentation are separate realities. Espinozahas given his sprawling commu- nity-:-atld his novel-'-a radiant hub, the Bo- tanka oshUn. Located inadown-at-the-heels strip maIl along with a soan-to...be-vacant 99- ce~t store and a Cambodian-owned dough- nutshop, it brings new meaning to the phrase "something for everyone:' "There were the silver medallas:' Espinoza writes, "storecl in a pla!;tic tackle box sitting on ashelf bE!hind the register, Egyptian ankhs and pendants in waoclen bfJxesJiningthe countertopsnE!ar the booldetsatldnovenas, theestarnPas, and rablJit'sfeet, theTarotcards and numerolfJgy charts, m the gI~s (:ases were sat~helsfiUE!d with sto?es~cI~e~c-qllartz, hem<ltit~, Cl)r'" ai, ~efJcl~'JlYl"ite, ~urq4?is~, jade. TherE!,yv_~rE! nedd~(:e~()ffPv.rri~!>hE!lIs"ro~aries, scap.ulars, lTlellorCllls,atldStays pfPa.1Iiclt Thelil.t I"LInsf()r @fJtI1~rfotlrP#agT~ph~. Espinoza understands that in stotyteIling, as in other forms of speII casting, sometimes more is more. The Botanka's proprietor is 72-year-old Perla Portillo. A second-genera- tion Agua Mansan, she appreciates the tug between old attitudes and new horizons. (Childless, she saw herfirstjob-o-assistingthe original oWl;1er-,-as a focus for hE!r underused energies. Herhusbandsawitas an illsulttohis earning p'ower.) Although not the sorceress her clients irJlagine, Perla has learned ways to nudge a tfoublEld neighbor closer to weII- being. She's a gooct Hgener, ,agoodobsElrver. Customers seldol11 leavewitl10utseveral pre~ scriptionr-"Drin~th~s, ~W-11 tI1is, read that:' Cures don't just h~ppen. Healing has to be encollfageci, The variolls plo~s8!lFc~_~racters instill Water saiI1ts~fecu;~Ia,~fJI'a.t,~ly arranged as th~~fJ~jca'!; shelve!>. ,PEll"Ia'srear, pres~nt- ~d)llcl1i:lJ:lt~r~Intrpdl,lf~~~Y repHc:as of the saint,~~1"ci~ shesells;f()l"IIl~the novel's rough :chron()I?~~ltl"LltlS froJl1j~tlary6 C'Peast of th~~~iP~'any?f 9W-Lord ~ I)fad,e Ios R~yes... 1'i:l~?r~pftriiv~leT$")thr?ugh December 12 ('1P~i:l~~()fN1J~stri:iSefiora,de:9uaclalupe' Holy ~fJ~~,~ra.l}4q~~ell of th~AJ'n~ric_as'~. perlii T~r.P!i:l,.!S~;f,~l~d~ld~rly~Iclo1N' but her W~:p~-br-:W<:tll~l1 e,}{~~I'ie~:~e~ encompass I~Y7,}.Oli;~, <md;#latfo.rt:tm~"'~E!IIingstaple, a mysterious stranger, beside more mundane arrivals IikethetattooparJorthatreplacesthe 99-cent store. Meanwhile, between the red-letter saint days Espinoza slips in the self-contained yet interrelated stories of her clients. In "Relics:' agroWnsondepri:!ssed by his father's death is furious that his mother still cherishes an ob- session with Elvis, Trying to construct a Day of the Dead tribute, the son gropes toward an understanding oftl1e ways mourning can insulate or enrich a lifE!. In ''Aftershocks,'' an elementCiry school teacher d,iscovers that a chissroom lesson on earthquakes also de- scribesthegrindingtectonics between fathers and daughters who resemble each other too closely. ReleasefromtheirmutuaIlystubbom statldoff, she.realiz~s, can only come with di- saster, but it's nonetheless liberating. Geography loorris largein these stories, as it does in the characters' consciousness. The freeway, so often portrayed in pop culture as anb;lVitationto adventure, is here botha pro- tective barrier anda !:ielf-imposed bOlmdary. lackofmoney, E!dllcation, orsufficientEnglish was enough to discollTClge older inhabitaIlts from ventlJril1~ fatfrl)m the neighborhood. ~1Jt ~ven aI11<:tl1~s~c()nd~ andthird-genera- H()~resicle?ts,npne_9fthosewhfJ leave Agua Mansado so lightly. Tereli8, a Pl1ysi(:ian 1Nho's 66 I LOS AN~ELES I FEBRUARY 2007 Valley ()bserver By Hank Stokes Follies, Triumphs, and Close Calls Credit journalists for a brighter, albeit mercurial Sun Nobody can figure out why, but the last weeks of a dying year often randomly reveal a handful of desert institutions at either their most admirable or their silliest, and some- times at both simultaneously The list always varies, but in November and December 2006, the spotlight pointed to The Desert Sun and Palm Springs City Council. We've had our fun with the Sun over the years, but this time we're more inclined to praise than blame. True, in late fall the newspaper ran a singularly unconvincing investigative report purporting to prove that illegal immigrants put more into the public treasury than they pull out of it. One sensed that the piece was written to please politi- cally correct editors - that its data, highly selective and repeatedly unsourced, were chosen to support a predetermined finding. Far more sweeping and compellingly docu- mented studies reaching the opposite con~ elusion were simply ignored. In fact, this effort proved nothing, though we doubt it did any great harm. The bias was too obvi~ ous; Sun readers themselves remarked on it. If the immigration inquiry was a tuJ:key, the paper more than compensated by publishing a four~part December series on the soaring costs of public employee retirement packages, They are rapidly becoming a hideous statewide problem, but Sun writers Keith Matheny and Erica Solvig sensibly kept their report's fOOlS on desert cities and school districts. This is an elephant~in~the~room topic of which most citizens are blissfully unaware and on which the Sun to its credit has finally broken its own silence. Whatever (in our opinion) were the series' deficiencies - a frustrating inconsistency in reportage clarity, ignoring certain elected councilsjboards that legally but coverdy receive the same publicly funded post~retirement medical benefits, ete. - they were tnunped by its essential message: that public employee pension pack~ ages are a building fiscal tsunami likely to devastate local government services. Similarly; very much to the Sun's credit was . its choice for Person of the Year 2006: Riverside County Supervisor Roy Wilson, whom virtually everyone cheers. He has been 118 Palm Springs Life I February 2007 www.palmsprjngslife.com ~N L I F EST Y L E S. GRAND HOTEL EUROPE ST. PETERSBURG. RUSSIA Called the "Venice of the Notth," Russia's magi- cal city sits astride the Neva River and boasts of countless canals that are crossed by more than 300 bridges and adorned by 500 palaces. St. Petersburg's history reads like a Harlequin tomance story, with the intrigue only the czars and cza~inas of an imperial past can provide. Its traditional offerings are unmatched: meals beginning with caviar, vodka so smooth it glides along the throat and summer days that never end (called "White Nights," the translation means around-the-clock sunlight). But it is winter season that showcases Russia, Dr. Zhivagocstyle. Fur-snuggling, horse-drawn sleigh rides through freshly powdered forests; enchanting evenings of ballet at the Mariinsky Theatre and having the Her- mitage without crowds (summer can mean multi-hour waits simply to enter the building) - this is the Russia oflovers. At the very heart of St. Petersburg is the Grand Hotel Europe, the city's lavish, art nouveau-style landmark whose history is intimately intertwined with its royal 112 San Diego Home/Garden Lifestyles February 2007 BENEFITS Second Annual Charity Bowling Event, March 31 Concourse Entertainment Center, Anaheim (714) 639-4990 ext. 245 www.pshc.org The Providence Speech & Hearing Center holds its second annual charity event, with bowling, casino, dinner buffet, dancing, prizes and more. Proceeds benefit the Center, which focuses on the identification, diagno- sis, treatment and prevention of speech, language and hearing disor- ders for persons of all ages. Fourth Annual Wine and Adventure Silent Auction, March 25 Rothschild's Restaurant (949) 673-3750 Rothsch i Idsrestaurant.com In support of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, Rothschild's restaurant holds its annual Wine and Adventure silent auction from 1-4 p.m. Tickets are $25 in advance, $30 at the door. Complimentary wine and hors d'oeu- vres are selVed. EVENTS/LECTURES/ WORKSHOPS The Dana Point Festival of Whales, March 3-11 Dana Point Various Locations www.festivalofwhales.com A variety of events including street fairs and whale watching excursions celebrate the California Gray Whales' incredible 6,000 mile migration from Alaska to Mexico. Visit the web site for details and locations of events. The Glory of Easter, March 23 Through April 7 Crystal Cathedral (714) 54-GLORY www.crystalcathedral.org The perennial extravaganza returns, with the requisite state-of-the-art spe- cial effects, live animals, flying angels, trumpeters, and a soundtrack record- ed by the London Symphony and Seattle Symphony Orchestras. Call or visit the web site for ticket informa- tion. Marine Mammal Exploration Cruises, March 3-25 Ocean Institute 9949) 496-2274 www.ocean-institute.org Ocean Institute offers weekend Marine Mammal Exploration Cruises with a ship-board view of whales, dolphins, sunfish, sea lions, and other creatures of the sea. Institute marine biologists lead the cruises on board the Sea Explorer, which makes use of state-of-the-art equipment such as an acoustic array, plankton nets, video microscopes, and a sedi- ment sampler. A dolphin camera will provide an underwater view. Trips last two hours. Cost includes admis~ sion to the Ocean Education Center. Call or visit the web site for more information. Return of the Swallows Celebration, 196 COAST MARCH 2007 r 'J . :- ' s [ P res t jPg e ,,; Editor.s Letter By Steven Biller Icons and Everyday Heroes ords without thoughts never to heaven go." These words deadpan on a color field mural encir- cling the rotunda at Miami- Dade Public Library. The multipanel word painting was the first work by Ed Ruscha that I experi- enced in person. I had seen his iconic Hollywood and Standard Oil paintings and a few word paintings in books. But a 360- degree perspective, up close and personal, was at once inspiring and the catalyst for my obsession with Ruscha's work. Twenty-five years later ~ after I had seen so many of his exhibitions at muse~ urns and galleries - Ruscha, the king of Los Angeles Pop art, opened his Venice Beach studio to Palm Springs Life for a his- toric photo session with two other icons; actor/artist Dennis Hopper and archi- tect/designer Frank Gehry. Photographer Michael Childers came back from Ruscha's studio with a stunning portfolio of images, which appear in "Hell- Raisers" (page 92). as well as on the cover of this issue. We celebrate the achievements of Ruscha, Hopper, and Gehry as Palm Springs Art Museum prepares to honor them on March 24 at its second annual Artists and Legends Gala. Incidentally, Childers was behind the lens at Imago Galleries, where he and Fashion Editor Susan Stein produced our spring fashion (page roo) amid works by Sophie Ryder, Fletcher Benton, and Robert Graham, In this issue, we also celebrate the work of the unsung heroes behind the Desert Mountains Land Trust. They include Ted Lennon, a developer who is hypersen,$i- tive about preserving the landscape and creating communities such as The Reserve and Stone Eagle that disappear into the mountains, invisible to passersby on Portola Avenue and Highway 74, respectively. In "Space Savers" (page 112), we caught up with Lennon and Trust chief Roger Tansey; who point out the land the trust has acquired and share their vision for the controlled growth of the Coachella Valley: For an extra-strength dose of Palm Springs Life, please tap into our Web site, www.palmspringslife.com. We also encourage your feedback. Please send your comments to steven@palmspringslife.com. II 36 Palm Springs Life I March 2007 www.palmspringslife.com CATALINA ISlAND MORRO BAY MAMMOTH lAKES AREA SAN DIEGO AREA Catalina Island 8!drfilM~/lk n _VILLA xORTOFINO NAPA VALLEY REDONDO BEACH MAMMOTH lAKES AREA M.\.l\II\ [OTHL AKES,COI\ I T~RE'f,NplJLACE pKE IT! CENTRAL RESERVATIONS MM"~_' REsORT CONDOMINIDM GETAWAYS 1 FREE NIGHT WINTER SPECIAL PI~GOUNT LIFr& LoDQING.PACKAGES 8Mi4-\1 \\lMOTH 8001.'21-.'261 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TheonlyliExtlusj~.eLadiesandMothersFitnessVacations"atthebeaeh in I.1Jplla, Callfomia, Lirniled enro!lmentSeparate ehildren's WDpS too! WWW.CAMPLAJOLLA.COM.l.800.825.TRIM . fREE 2-YEAR FOllOW-UP. NUTRITION. FITNESS. FUN! To advertise in The Sunset Travel Directory,@ call 1-877-748-0737 Sunset March 2007 153 L I F EST Y L E S. Seattle-based Erik Elvejord of Hol- land America explains why his com- pauy took that gamble. "We wanted a departure point that made it easy for guests to get to the ship, sightsee and enjoy themselves. San Diego was that pOtt compared to Los Angeles. Easyait access, a cruise terminal that is down- town and a place where folks can walk into town or catch a short cab ride were the deciding factots." Now. providing cruises from Sq,n Diego ate eight lines: Carnival, Celebti- ty, Crystal, Holland America, Princess, Regent Seven Seas, Royal Caribbean and Silversea. The biggest eVent in the city's cmise histoty occurred in the fall of 2005 when four ships arrived the same day. Holland America is dominant with three ships homeported here from fall to spring at the B Street Tetminal. They're the Oosterdam, sailing on week- ly 7 -day roundtrips to the Mexican Riviera; Ryndam, with a lO-day itin- erary to the Sea of Cortez and Mexi- CaU Rivieta; and Zaandam, bound for Hawaii eVety 15 days. Also, the home- ported Carnival Spirit has an eight-day Mexican Riviera schedule. The Mexican Riviera has become so populat it now is one of the wot/d's top five cruise destinations, according to the Cruise Line International Associa- tion (CLIA). "It's no wonder that Mexican Riviera cruises continue to grow in popular- ity," says Terry Dale, CLIA's president. "These cmises have it all - charm- ing villages, bustling cities, fabulous food and culture, and miles and miles of flawless beaches." Another reason for its appeal is its vacation packages are more reason- San Diego Home/Garden lifestyles March 2007 93 L I F EST Y L E S. I I I I I I I l I I I trips. "No matter where I go, there are women talking about travel, spas and shopping:' With the birth of this spe- cialry industry comes grand expectations - and after all, women rhink big. .Other than love of experiencing new destinations, the only commonalities among the soon-to-be clients of Wild Women Travel seem to be age (aver- aging hetween 40 and 70 years old) and annual income, which starts at $50,000. Limired only hy imagination, trips - such as art appreciation, garden- ing, wine tasting, spa rejuvenation and adventure tours, shopping excursions and religious retreats - offer every- thing from relaxation to adrenaline rushes, from spiritual awakenings to how-to classes. Whatever the trip theme or travel company of choice, girls' getaways pivot on a central value: camaraderie. Travel guru aud shoppiug diva Nancy Shina rook note of this. She left the corporate world as an executive in the hospitality and tourism iudustry and applied her 20 years' experience to launch Spree the Art of Shopping, a private shopping firm in Scottsdale, Ariz., two years ago. "The spirit of (girls' getaways) is they want to do something fun that's just for them," says Shina. "Women have busy lives, husbands, responsibilities - their lives are full. They deserve to relax. Whatever it is, you should spoil yourself:' Catering to female guests of desti- nation resorts who love shopping, the four-person company offers special- ized tours: unique boutiques, designer discounts, home decor and art. These customized excursions are defined by limousine transportation, VIP ser- vice, after-hours access at stores, and a Spree expert shoppiug guide, which is an extension of the services offered by such destination resorts in the Phoenix area as the Arizona Biltmore Resort & Spa, Hotel Valley Ho and the Four Seasons Resort Scottsdale at Troon North. But not everyone enjoys the royal treatment. Cookie Cairnes, 56, has been living in San Diego for more than 20 years. and traveling all over the world much longer than that. With the help of Wild Women Trav- el, she is planning a two-week jaunt with a girlfriend (and a handful of other women she hasn't met yet) next year to Panama, Costa Rica and Ecua- dor. ''I'm not the sitting-around-being- pampered type," says Cairnes, who has traveled to many countries for adven- ture, cultural and nature trips. ''A lot of women are divorced (like myself), widowed or have husbands who don't care to travel anymore. You feel like the odd man out when everyone is cou- San Diego Home/Garden lifestyles April 2007 109 l ADVERTISING SECTION "E"I.,.,'....>l!'''U'',..~1!! fIr,'i", ... ~W]iEj& ;~~ "'!l,\l1!l; .1&"", Nestled among rolling hills, the Temecula Valley is an outdoor enthusiast's playground-full of day and night-time activities for all ages. Enjoy a glass of wine at one of our 20+ award-winning wineries. Gaze upon rows oflush vineyards from high above in a hot air balloon. Putt your worries away on one of seven championship golf courses, or maybe test lady luck and dance the night away at Pechanga Resort & Casiuo. Join us on June 16 for Sunset Jazz in the Vines, and visit W\~fw.temeculacvb.com for more exciting upcoming events. photos left to right Palace of fine Arts AnexquisiteartNnd-sdencecomplex in San Francisco's Marina District. The Golden Gate Bridge cost $36.7 million to complete in 1937. it now carries upward of 100,000 vehicles per day. Hal1ggliding San Diego'sfantasticweather isa lure for hang gliders. Elephant Seal,s Oneoffourpinnipedspedes:on SanMiguel Island. From Temecula, it's only a short jour~ey to poPular San piego. Although th~ San Piego Zoo and Sea World grab the lions share ofheadlihes; there's plenty more to .see aIlddo. Balboa Park; a l;200~_acre oasis in the middle of the city, offers,gardens, mllseuins, golf,hiking andlIlor~.. 'Il1eadjacentGaslamP Quarterdi_shesuPanedectic mix of restaur~ts, induding~lue Point So~tal Sllisine, ~hichserves a wide selecti()l1 ofse;rfood and beef dishes. Or ~der over~oOld TotVIl foraroUIld_()fri13f~aritasa1l4 fajitas. These days,..th~.cityi,s.l.J~$tlin~: P~k'fe~.a(:e,-l?_f~~edjIl San Di~go's rapidly <leve1oping.down~?WJ:1neighborhood, J3astVillage, offersl~'<U1d}Oc~tiOIlsurrounde~:hy~,e'southem C<llifornialif~tyte.Upsc~~aIllenities.fillthe int~rior ofev~ryhoITIe,an9-_evertthinge~Sejsright around the corner~Rllth's Chris Steak fI()llseand PetcoPark, home ofthe~an.pieg9 P~4res. If a q~e~b~ac4 holiqay sounqs. app~g~,the. s~#fitiecOInP1unity of La Jollalllak:es ~ splash~Ifsjust ~O minutesfrom downtown San Diego but a world away. The La Jolla Beach and Tennis Club provides the perfect setting, with beach bungalow-s. par~3. golf;,~~I1I1is.sp~anqp~~Tr,~~~titsawar<i~~g re$urant:'Ihe1\1~~ ~ooII1; Hilcenorth alo~g tp(: bea.rl1~4 ewlof(:tidegP91~+"(:oIJ.lpl(:~;~~.~sh, seaaI1eITIones,:octopiaI:Ldotlier~.ea.life.Qr; heaP. to TorreyP~es G9lfC()urse,w~ch, '(Jffe~~.br~a~t~~yi~~~ oftl1~blt1e l?aFifi(:~idtowinZ'9iffs-a.rlq:raviIles~ Garlsbaq, '(Ji1lY}.~111iles.-l1p.~~'~Q"a~~;;f~a.trif~W_TI,~q{)sta_ResoIt aI1dSp~'Ile~~~dwi~,~OQ:~~~~ ()f<ipastal fo()thillsand l~gClI"<i~n,s :9Jl,d ste~p~q:iI1Spanish,gol()ni<4 charIll. Newly refurbish~ti~theresortllow fXere's these 90 I LOS ANGELES [ JUNE 2007 . o u " " " z , o M z , ~- , " i L I F EST Y L E S" When's the best time to visit California's wine country? That depends on you. If you disdain crowds and congestion, good luck, especially if you're headed for Napa and Sonoma. Still, some seasons are less crowded than others. For trips to Napa and Sonoma, try the winter months. With vines dormant from December through February, the roads, inns and tasting rooms are less congested than usual. Another lure iu February are the blooming wild mustard plants. In March and April, buds form on vines and other wild- flowers burst to life. If you dou't mind heat, May through August could be your time, even though the crowds are substantial. The crowds also are large during the heady days of harvest time and the long-anticipated "crush" in the vineyards in September and October. But beware - a big "crush" also occurs daily on the area's roads. Finally, remember November. Many travelers consider this month the most gorgeous time to visit the wine country. SONOMA Sonoma County, which often has had to play second fid- dle to its more recognized neighbor, is the birthplace of the California wiue industry and its first-named wiuery. About the size of Rhode Island, it is larger, more geographically diverse than Napa with three rivers, a long Pacific Ocean coastline, wineries closer to San Francisco and has the only nonstop daily airline service from Los Angeles. It exceeds Napa in more planted acres of grapes and in the number of wine-grape growers. The quality of Souoma's 250 wineries, aud the number of its international awards, rival Napa's. Sonoma excels in the Pinot Noir grape because of the beneficial effects of coastal cooling. Other prime varietals grown amidst a landscape of picturesque valleys, rolling hills and groves of oak, redwood and olive trees, are Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon, Mer- lot, Sauvignon-Fume Blanc and Zinfandel. It's no accideut that horticulturist Luther Burbank chose the county for his experimental gardens and farm. He once remarked that the wine-growing and agricultural region must be "the chosen spot of all the earth as far as Nature is concerned:' His legacy lives on at Luther Burbank Home & Gardens in Santa Rosa. The northern Sonoma town of Healdsburg is the gate- way to the wondetful blending of wineries, vineyards and gardens that prevail in both the picture-perfect Dry Creek San Diego Home/Garden lifestyles August 2007 109 CATALINA ISLAND MONTEREY PENINSULA NAPA VALLEY LAKE ARROWHEAD ,/ Retreat to mountain-fresh air. Experience the final results of our exquisite $18 million resort~wide transfonnation. Superbly remQcjeled suites and guestrooms.CreCitive California cuisine at B-'N189. Pampering treatments at the new Spa ofthe Pines. Come to Lake Arrowhead Resort and Spa and awaken the senses. , To advertise in The Sunset Travel Directory,@ call 1-877-748-0737 Sunset SeptemberZoo7 148A Gala Sousa Concert with Conductor Keith Brion, October 14 Cal State Fullerton's Meng Concert Hall (714) 278-3371 www.arts.fullerton.edu Relive a John Philip Sousa concert with conductor Keith Brion, as he leads the CSUF University Wind Symphony. Experience light classics, great marches and virtuoso solos with faculty soprano Patricia Prunty, faculty flutist Cynthia Ellis and Utah Symphony Orchestra trombonist Larry Zalkind. Jazz at the Beach: Charlie Shoemake Quartet, October 3 Hotel Laguna's Rose Garden (949) 715-9713 www.lagunabeachlive.org Laguna Beach Live presents Charlie Shoemake joined by vocalist Sandi Shoemake, drums, guitar and bass. Jazz Lab with Guest Artist Paul Carman, OCtober 1 McKinney Theatre, Saddleback College (949) 582-4656 Saxophonist/composer Paul Carmen, veteran of the Frank Zappa Band, per~ forms with The Saddleback Jazz Lab. Tickets are $10 general; $7 students/seniors. Lloyd Rodgers Group, October 11 Cal State Fullerton's Recital Hall (714) 278-3371 www.arts.fullerton.edu Faculty artist Lloyd Rodgers brings his contemporary new-music group to per- form on campus. The Manhattan Transfer, October 11-13 Orange County Performing Arts Center (714) 755-5799 www.pacificsymphony.org Pacific Symphony presents one of the first true crossover ensembles (they were the first to win Grammys in both the jazz and pop categories in the same year), The Manhattan Transfer performs music from the '30s to the '80s, touching on bebop, jazz, doo wop and pop. Mariza, Vocalist, October 27 Orange County Performing Arts Center (714) 556-2787 www.ocpac.org The beautiful international Fado singer - considered Portuguese blues - has performed for the opening of Disney Hall, in New York's Central Park, at the Hollywood Bowl and sold out the Belem Cultural Centre in Lisbon. Max Raabe and His Palace Orchestra, October 28 Orange County Performing Arts Center (949) 553-2422 www.PhilharmonicSociety.org The Philharmonic Society of Orange County presents band leader and German singer Max Raabe and his Palace Orchestra, recreating the sounds of German dance and film music of the pre-Big Band/Roaring Twenties era, such as "Singing in the Rain," "Cheek to Cheek," and" Dream a Little Dream." Men Alive's Cabaret Soiree with Sam Harris, October 20 OC Pavilion Theatre 866-MEN-ALlVE (636-2548) COAST OCTOBER 2007 177 -~'"-:<~:~~:~~;'~::~~:;-":~::c" ',"',":' ': ?-~:.. ~ ... ' . ,:.,~".:: ''','c " ';"Y~>~:- :-c' :~ - (FQ~MEI!i aI{Q'E~'F&iiR~', : ,,',. ::"'. .c ' 'c, \ '- - ," '",., ;, <.j :;J'<- o~"''' <,-,'"J:.'"',,.,'j ~~,,,,,,,;~ '~ ,:'~. ,,- , ~ ,~ ~ "" ' " ~,~' _ ~" ~ " - - ~ <A~, <~O -~- MAMMOTH LAKES AREA MAMMOTHLAKES.COM THERE'S Nt) PLilCE LIKE IT! CENTRAL RESERVATIONS MAKE PUNS To VISIT TODAY! ~ REsORT CONDOMINIDM GETAWAYS 1 FREE NIGHT WINTER SPECIAL DISCOUNT LIFT & LODGING PACKAGES 866!4-MAl\IMOTH 800/321-3261 NAPA VALLEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Hike. Golf. Shop. Dance, Swim, Go ahead, make yoor plaosm'we won't hold yoo to them. fl PALM DESERT Fora FrlleVacation Guide 800 873 2428 www.palm.desert-org!.!r ISLAND OF HAWAII Discover Biglsl~ndj~~Gry~tMaHlla Kea Resort. Two acclaimed hotels, the most dreamed-of beaches in Hawaii, two world-class golf courses, a full-service spa, seaside tennis club and an array of dining choices. It's the ultimate Kohala Coast experience. CA: www.PrinceResortsHawaii.coml.-866-PRINCE-6 dr/uce.J MaunaKeaBeach~otell HapunaBeachPrlnceHolel I MaulPrlnceHotel I HawaiiPrinceHoIelWalkiki RESORTS HAWAII 1548 Sunset October 2007 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA t)dYcv~Y'CV~~ at;nc-~cvc::haY~ Spend a weekend night at a participating Irvine hotel and receive a $50 retan gift card. free parking and free breakfast* With rooms from just $99, you mIght even wont to add an extra night. This is Orange County, Cdfornia after all. Go to www.stayinirvine.com for details. coupons, locations and hotel reservations. Minutes from everywhere. Close to perted. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY Enjoy ,un, surf and golf on the Monterey Bay. Large selection of properties. Bailey Property Management www.baileyproperties.com 1-800-341'6830 Use Postpaid Reader Service Card or call '-800-967-3'89 for Free Brochures on the role of conservationists and come to the aid of sharks, seals, sea lions and many other marine species in peril. Participants will don scuba gear and jour- ney through the wonders of the coral reef, kelp forest and deep sea trenches. "Pyrate" Adventure Sails, Various Ocean Institute www.ocean-institute.org The Ocean Institute offers "Pyrate" adven- tures aboard its schooner Spirit of Dana Point. A crew in historical costume intro- duces guests to the Golden Age of Sail. Tales and Scales: The Pied Piper, November 30 through December 2 Orange County Performing Arts Center (714) SS6-2787 www.ocpac.org Flutes fly, trombones tango and drums dance as the Tales & Scales ensemble puts music and story into motion. The Wiz, through November 18 Broadway On Tour (714) S42-69~9 www.broadwayontour.org Dorothy's adventures in the Land of Oz have been set to new music in a dazzling, lively mixture of rock, gospel and soul music. Everybody knows the story, but now it's a new fantasy for today - myste- rious, opulent and fancifuL A youth pro- duction. CHILDREN AND FAMILIES - ONGOING Bowers Kidseum (714) 480-1 S20 www.bowers.org Pre-school discoveries class on Mondays from 10:30 a.m. to noon. Saturdays and Sundays, drop-in art lab projects are available from 12:30-3:30 p.m. Storytelling on the third Saturday of every month from 1 :30~2:30 p.m. includ- ed in cost of admission. Tea parties on third Saturdays from 10:30 a.m. to noon. Children's Museum at La Habra (S62) 90S-9693 www.lhcm.org An active learning center where children up to age 12 can learn through playing in hands-on exhibits, ongoing arts and crafts workshops, festivals, storytelling, and performances. Call or visit the Web site for more information. Discovery Science Center (714) S42-CUBE www.discoverycube.org Featuring Dino Quest, the world's first interactive dinosaur adventure. Learn fun clues about our past and how dinosaurs lived, as well as science concepts such as body systems, predator and prey rela- tionships, morphology, habitats, fossils, and tracks. KidStation: Voyage to th~ bottom of the ocean with this remodeled area for kids five and under. Museum hours are 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., daily. . . . ForCa/endar placement, please e-mail event description, location, date, and contact information to: susan@coast magazine. com or fax Calendar Listing, (949) 644-4055, Deadline November 2,0 234 COAST NOVEMBER 2007 1be Food ~~- p n f\ j\ i c') r !~ i 1. : A. t'I/I' .(.,',:' ! ,\\._..J.V\ L. j\.,_! \~_,,, _ . rs' Guide I~-~.. 1 1, ~ i't. !! I ,.-.. r-~) EU T' ("\ f" 1 ~ " >j \r ;_.~ 1-'" r'\ . " J !"" '_oj \._j t \ If! ! ~__, " __ 1 \./ t.. T !..___~ I~~- ! ~ I L~ () ~;.'r F F . WHY WE GET A> \ OUT< The Resurrection of a Legendary Skateboarder BY ROBERT ITD Is Mario Batali & Nancy Silverton's asteria Mazza Worth the Fuss? BY PATRie KUH The Greatest ski GetawayYou've Never Heard of BY ERn".J ROTTIJ,.~,H WATER GRILL Downtown's besHovedseafood restaul'ilntis now in the good hands of Chef David leFevre. His is top-oHhe-line fare, whether it's fresh oysters on a bed of ice, a whole- leafsalad wit,", goat cheese, pear, and toasted hazelnuts, or spanking-fresh fish artfully cooked. Desserts are di~ vine. >>5445. Grand Ave. (213~891-o9oo orwatergrill.com). lMon.-FriJ D nightly. Full bar. Seafood $5$ LOS FEUZ & SILVER LAKE AROMA Chef Ediri M~rroquin, formerly of Valentino, owns this intil1la~eSilver lake operation whose namemust rElfer to the ~electablefragrance of therusticltali,an 9lisine that waftS,ab()utth~dil1ljnutive,dil:ling,rOOm,The ~m-: phasi~isonseafood,savor.Ymeats,and~~rtypas~ bptth~ <I(lilyspfi!cials ar~:tlJl:!realde<lLAn <l~tipasti plate laden with bUl!ata andpr07ciJ,l~o~ se<Jfood ling:uine, or osso buco ""i~h saffrori rice:? Ordl;!r it aiL You won't be sollY.>> 2903 _w,. Sunset Blvdy Silver lake (323':"644,:"2833). D nightly; Beerand wifle.ltalian $$ BLAIR'S The hili- and dining rO,dmsare small afldhaJlpily p<icked; folks flock in for breakfClsts (If ~luebE!ll}' pam4kes,with mascialY,one, and lunchtime p3T1ini of tl\r~ey pastra~~1i, saueri<raut,and Gruyere, At dj~n~r the_gal1l(1t runs frPm shrimpcocktaH .....ith deviled eggs to Tasmanialls_almon with bT<lisedfennel, Cilnd carro,t in orange~black~pepper r~c1uction, There is;;! nic,e,beer (Chil11ayaJ~) selection, too, >>2903 RowenaAve.,Silver Lake (323;-660-1882 or blairsr$u.fa~tcorn), B-:L ':"Dd<!i1y. Califomia$$$ CL'r::F''$_'~~Ci~ The,!;P1fl""ling,hHISid~P_;ati(lat this~UVE!rl<lkE! l1ideaway Ugh~",patniglttlik~thes",,;~F"!mil.yRClb'il1~()n'S9f7 eteriCl,~00kfClrsm<lll,i:Ii5hes ofricotiabrusch(!tta topp~ with marinated grapes, savory pumpkin ravioli, and a perfeCt plate of sliced grilled sirloiri and melted Gorgon- zola.>> 3626 W, Sunset Blvd., Silver lake (323-666-6116). D Mon.-Sat; brunch sat.-sun. Full bar. CaHtalian $$ DUSTY'S It's hard not to love the combo of old-fashioned cafe ambience and contemporary menu. For breakfast, mother-so:n owners Maria Miller and David DiSalvio selVe e9:gs evetywhichW?y, heCivenly French toast, and house juices likestrawlleny~()range~ At lunch it's soups, salads, andburgers (Iamb, turkey,beef, and crab) as well as heartier fi!ntr-ees. Now there's dinner, too: es- cargots,beef carpaccio, artichoke ravi(lli, prime rib eye. n.3200 W. Sunset BlvdySilver Lake (323-906-1018), B-l,:"D ~ailY'~,eeraTldwine.French-American .$$ EPf:ND"I.oI:Gffli,;L There's aSPlO!::lkea,sy v;be tothis firehouse turned res- ta(1rantwh,eresirl()insteak;meat loaF with app/ewood- sl11()ke~bac()n,androasted chicken are on offer. Eat inside or -Clu~,or just liquidate yourself at the 38-foot bar. ~?:838 Rowena Ave., Silver ,lake (323~66/)-2000 or edfllJda,legrUI:c:om). D nightly. Full bar. American $$$ MEXICO CITY The de~or is '50s Naugahyde, the crowd los Feliz cool cats, and the l11~nu at:ypical. The spinach enl:hi~ la~~jth ;:lZacatecana,sauce_of pob/ano chil~,sour crea1l1,ClI1~'_O:;Tiions-:cbest shows off the kitchen's abjl- it.r,carnivor!aSV1i11Jikethecochini~pibi1(Yucatan_styIe miariTiCltedpork).>> 2121 HiIlhurstp,ve., Los Feliz (323~661 ~ 72,2'n t"Veq,-$un.; ()nightly; Fuilpar.Mexican $ sqlJARI::9NE'PI~ING Th~ p<ltioi!>_livelYi <In_d thefoocJ-,;-~reakfast and lunch all~<ly---cis killer,steel-:c:~t_IJ<ltmeal '!Vith fresh fruit or hOl!sli!,l11""de f1TCino/ia iSia<~E!C1I~hful wa'ttog(),but ,why b?th~rin11:11~ f~~e()f !>tol1,e,g-rOcund~rits wjth~hee!>e <Jnd~con?9t~,~r.~_~rio~~tio~~I~s.fl)ril1dulg7nce:bri~ cic:h~Fr~r1f:h~~,t tQPpfi!a"Yi~h ~a~anas ..ni:lc;~~u!i (:Clra~ 111,71.Clrcl;;l,!>~irl::~e"*~llcl~icJ:l_~l)y~recl inC<iriallleli_ze.ci s~~I,i(lts ,Cl!l,dl;Jluecl:'eE!!iel1()rIClnclaJ;;e'~48~4 F~l!ntain Avey_si(ver lake (3:2~-:p/)1-n09 orsquareonedining.col1})' a-t_ ~<liIY'f'loalc:oh,l)I. UpscaleDiner $ HOllYWOOD it MELROSE AGO Perfectly cooked pastas come piping hot at this sleek showcase (co-owned by Robert Qe Niro), and pizzas come direct from a brick oven, Entrees include the likes of monkfish with creamy polenta and baby rack of lamb,>> 8478 MelroseAve. (323":655-6333), lMon,-Fri.; D nightly. Full bar. Tuscan $$$ AU.'ANGELO Stefano Ongarc was ~ GMwj~ha Following at Valentino <lnd II Grano, and he's h()oke<t.up with chef Mirko Pa- demo,exofValentino andDoke, The room's small and candlelit,and the food's exquisite. A tripe appetizer has been stewed for hours, Its tomatoey sauce spiked with spice and topped with polenta triangles. A guinea he~ si:uffedwith h(luse-made sClLlsageiand set ona bed of sauteed chard is fantastic. FC?r dessert, the lemon ~readpudding, made with polen_ta, isa fine way t(l ,go, ,...7166 Melrose Ave. (323-933~9S40). D Mon.-Sat. Beer and wine. Italian $$$ AMrvt() Amy.s'V1ee~ey'srestaural)t now ha_sa Iiqllor license, a har/and cus~yganquet~es.At lUnch there C1retasty s<Jliads,loaded sand~iches, and great~h_o~olate chip cCl~~ies, At night it's what regulars have come to ex- pect: .~. soph,lstJC<i~ed versio_n of creative hOme coo~- SMALL BITE Right about now the guys behind 101 Coffee Shop and Dominick's are opening L;;;U~ D;:mi's (serving breakfast,lunch, and dinner) in the old Belle Epoque space in los Feliz. That's their Italian deli next door, too. 218 I LOS ANGELES I NOVEMBER 2007 Editor's Letter By Steven Biller How to Land (and Stay) on the A-List YOU may be the center of at- tention in every gala ballroom you enter or have so much money and power that you allow your social graces to fall by the wayside. Or perhap' you attend only one or two formal events during the season and feel as if you teeter on the fringes of "society." We media types have a special perspec- tive on behavior at these events. We seldom have affluence. And although we typically attend as observers, we struggle to avoid becoming part of the story. At our best, we want to understand the cause (most social events have one) and explain and celebrate that in our magazine. Inevitably, after you have attended doz- ens of gala events each year, the old charm- school1essons become second nature. But you're never too seasoned for a little polish. Here are some tips for the season: . Be assertive, bright, and positive. Help your host by mixing and mingling and being a part of the good time. . Lie! That's right. It's OK at a party; in fact, it seems expected. If you always say what you really mean, you might drop off the A-list. Compliment that dress; over- state how much you enjoyed that cold and rainy visit to gray London. . Praise the honorees and the High Priests and Priestesses of Charity. Sure, they've heard it a thousand times, but trust me: They're happy to hear it again and again. And why not? It's for a good cause. . Be a matchmaker. Connect people with common interests and then politely excuse yourself so you can move on to other socially and politically important people. . Take the drunk out for some fresh air. The drunk guest comes with the territory. Rather than cause a scene, say; "Hey; I think I've had one too many cocktails. Would you walk outside with me for some fresh air?" It always works. It's the sober ones who behave like drunks that send you walking in the opposite direction. . Break the silence and the tension. Ask for restaurant or vacation ideas. Or, if you encounter a dual of words, offer a light joke to cool the hotheads. If that fails, excuse yourself with a graceful smile. Most important: Have fun and give! . Palm Springs Life welcomes your fteJback. Please send your comments and ideas to Steven B111er, Editor-in-Chiif Palm Springs Life, 303 N. Indian Canyon Drive, Palm Springs, CA 92262, or e-mat1 steven@palrnspringslife.com. 28 Palm Springs Life I November 2007 www.palmspringslife.com "s,~~-ft '<,eoX,~~~ >-'^~~~:S:.- ~:<, ~ ,,~~ '" ~ ~ ~ < ~,y:-:"~ ~",1 ,<;"\ z ~~ ,~;(" ~ " ~~,~, ~ '" 'FR~YEt; Di(REGmDR~ " <, '_ ': , ,[ , _ " -" ~ c_" > A~' ~ " , ~ " ~, >' MAMMOTH LAKES AREA ) Huge sunshine. Huge snowfall. Huge terrain. MAMMOTH LAKES AREA MAMMOTH LAKES. COM SAN DIEGO AREA THERE'S No PLACE LIKE IT! CENTRAL RESERVATIONS M~~_" REsORT CONDOMINIDM GETAWAYS IF)j:I!;l'!HiHT W~lf~fEt:IAL IJJSCPlIJ:>,lJ:LIFr',&.I),IQq!NQPACKAGES // 866/4-MAMMOTH 800/321-3261 MONTEREY PENINSULA 150B Sunset November 2007 SOLVANG/SANTA YNEZ VAllEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Use Postpaid Reader Service Card or call '-800-967-3'89 for Free Brochures :_:.'.''-:.':~i-.',~'::--:'::..'/-,":',-:.:-::.':..,;,'......;-':.'..'_:.:,".....::."'-".'.:.:.2':::'-:':" ' )tf:J3ess is curre~tlyt4~first,a1.~~rnate; ,.',.".". '. Michael Suhre won the 2007 110rMade-adidas Golf Gateway PGA iistatltProfessional ChaJJlpionship for Gateway Section with a:fine score of Ul4er;:par 142 at Meadowbrook c.c. an NOrIIuUlofCrab Orchard G.C. and I. Aupir1gfroIIl~~Ueriyec.C. tied for ondplac~_wi~ ~.143, ~astlYj~BiIILatl~ll:lo~e'claimed v:ic~ory :heSlice:of.LifePrq::i\n1 at Crab ::hard Ge. in Carterville, m. -Don Bliss .EORGIA ~terson takes Section ~A jGi\ffe?4Pt()fessiop;ll,lvIatt Peters()Jl,theTJl1,iversityof qeorgi,~ ::'i;~i~l?r~4~t the E.,Z-qo ,Georgia A(iW?~pipllshippresellt~d by l\"p;tlJ...,G~Y~W~r:qolf". thePGA Tour ,SkyGolf at Sea Island G.C.'s ntation~ourse. T01l1J1lYBraci1enaIid Stephen Keppler sl:ie4 tied for secoIld ~t 6-und~r-par. WitlJ. the victory,Peterson, earned a h into the 2008 PGA Professional ionalCharnpionship at Reynolds J.tation in June. . . . . . T01JJJIlY Brannen won the E-Z-Go P G A 5 E C T " -,:-:-'-:-~:,._':-:--'::'::-:--i::-;":-':-:-':..-:--';.-.::":'.".'::.'."'-","":'.'.-..';""'-;:,-,-;:,,,.,.--, ...'--- G_ep~giaJ?c;i\. S~n~()r,Q4~~p~Ollshipat The Frog G.e. after a playoff with Wyatt Detmer and Bill Spannuth. By winnillg,Brannen qllalified for the 2007 Callaway Golf Senior PGA Pf6fessional National Championship at The PGA Golf Club in Port St. Lucie, Fla., along with Detlller,Spannuthi. Gregg Wolff and J oha Godwin. .',. '.,. ,. BryaIJt Qdqm worithe r~ylo;Madec adidas Golf Georgia PGA Assistant ProfessiOAalC4arnpionsb1p at Govetn,ors Towge Club; By:wii1!ling, Odo~qualified for the 2007 TaylorMade-adidas GolfPGA AssistantProfes~i()llaJ qh3J:I1PiqllShip at The PGA Golf Club (Wanamaker CollTse) inPq+f St, Lucie, Fla. 9doI11m~g~dafive.;stroke victory over Andy Blanton and Chip Zi~I11~TI11a.tJ,~ M~tl: Larson and Shawn T{o_cr~s.lI~~.ip....~..tie for fourth. . Blanton apd,~i,l1J111errn-~ ,q~li~e4 for the <;ll.3J:I1pipnship. aIl~. ~arsoll beat l{o~ in a onecholeplayoffto secure the Section's final spot in the c;hampionship. .:. '. . '. MarlettaC.Cand Coosa C.e. took home top honors at the E-Z-Go Pro- President presented by GolfLogix and Nik~ Golf at Dunwoody e.e. The Marietta e.C. team of Stephen Keppler, PGA director of golf, and partner Robert i I Nnupm'hp-r-)()()7 I <u~.~u_______--:__ ___ '-___ o N NEW 5 Fowler claimed the gross division with a 6-under-par 66. Coosa C.C. captured the net division after PGA Head Professional Brian Albertson and partner Marshall Mann defeated the Coosa C.C. team in a playoff. Thanks to E-Z-Go, GolfLogix, Nike Golf and Dunwoody e.e. for their support of this event. ~cottGordon GULF STATES 1$!!l"IY wins cfespite weather M.. att Berry,PGA head prof~sional at the Island C,C~, emerged victorious in the 2007 E<uGo Gulf States Section Championship held at New Orleans e.e. The event was shortened to 36 holes after several4ours. of delays due. to lightning in the area. Berry's~-und~r~pat140 was good enollgh for llom~-strokevictory over per~k_ Sanders, PGA head :professional at Englisb Turn G. & C.G., and Phil Schmitt, PGA headprofessio.llal. at the Bluffs e.e. & Resort. Thanks.toallofoUT sponsors for making thi,s a great event: Title Sponsor- !l~n Nelson Golf & UtilityY~hicles (E-Z- GO); S~pporting Sponsor.;.. PGA Tour; :preseIltingSpqnsors.,., Town Talk and Laser Link Golf. .... -. Jerry (Jovich,PGA. assistaJit professional at Sh~llL~dingG.C., fireq a lO~llllder~par 134 to win this year's Gulf States Senior Section (JhampionshipandGulf States Senior PGA Ptofessional Champiollshipheld at .River Bend Links G,C. Covich will lead three other qualifiers to the CallawaYG()~fS~nior..Pqt\. :ptofessioIlal ,National. ChanlPipnship in Port St. f~cil7,~I~',:S~~I1St.oPf,P(j.Ap,e-ad professiollalat the AU411bo~ ParkG-.C.; ~~e~Jl;ug~_~s,.P(j.^J,le~cl~rofession~1 atB~ck.t\.~~esC,C.~~ndI:eigI1Brannanj headprofessi()p~lat GoloniaIQ,(J., De~rI;i~ld,CQ1J.Ts~. T4~ tOt:l1~s~ffatluyer,J?erd J:.;iI11::sC;'C. ,,"iJ:I RpQins9.trVi~le,l\1i~~;jfor ",""''''''',, From left to right: Jim Dorman (qSPGA VPj, Moff Berry (Champion ~ The Island), Benji Nelson (E-Z-Go). Eorllonoix (ldser link), Mike Tullos IE-Z-Go) and Owen Bonfilio Iloser link). Bowers Museum Event, Ongoing The Bowers Museum (714) 567-3600 www.bowers.org December 6: Music Series with Larry Maurer: Frank Sinatra, The Very Good years; December 9: Las Posadas cele- bration; December 16: The Stories Behind and Within the World's Most Beautiful Gems; December 20: South Coast Handbell Ensemble: Yuletide Celebration; December 29: Kwanzaa Celebration; December 30: Icarus Puppet Company: Stories from Around the World. Call or visit the Web site for times and information. Celebrate the Season at Irvine Spectrum Center, through December 24 Irvine Spectrum Center (949) 735-5180 www.ShoplrvineSpectrumCenter.com Through December 24: Santa Photos; December 9: Menorah Lighting Ceremony. Chanukah Bash at the Beach, December 9 Laguna Main Beach (949) 499-0770 www.chabadoflaguna.com Come to Laguna Main Beach for menorah lighting, dreidles & donuts, stiltwalkers, latkes, crafts and a dreidle house. The festivities start at 2 p.m. Presented by Chabad of Laguna Beach. Chanukah Fiesta, December 11 Chabad Jewish Center in Laguna Beach (949) 499-0770 www.chabadoflaguna.com Sizzling Mexican buffet, live Israeli music and dancing with Jimmy Gamliel, candle dipping, wooden drei- die crafts, face painting, chocolate gelt and more. The festivities begin at 5 p.m. Presented by Chabad of Laguna Beach Cinema Orange, December 13 Orange County Museum of Art (949) 759-1122 www.ocma.net Let's Get Lost, directed by Bruce Weber, is a rarely-screened documen- tary charting jazz trumpeter Chet Baker's meteoric rise, precipitous fall and sadly diminished end, intercutting footage from Baker's musical heyday and the last years before his untimely death. Cirque du Solei!: Corteo, through December 23 Orange County Fair & Exposition Center, Costa Mesa (800) 678-5440 www.cirquedusoleil.com Carteo, which means "cortege" in Italian, is a joyous procession, a fes- tive parade imagined by a clown. The clown pictures his own funeral taking place in a carnival atmosphere, watched over by quietly caring angels. The show brings together the passion of the actor with the grace and power of the acrobat to plunge the audience into a theatrical world of fun, comedy and spontaneity situated in a mysterious space between heav- en and earth. 204 COAST DECEMBER 2007 'Ease. to makey...... home shin -" --,:,"::,.i:,,\',:':;:L-'::', s~~~a:~ cook your Cities that ... know how to celebrate $4.99US $6.50CAN WEEKEND GETAWAY Winter dream trip: red rocks snowfall DECEMBER 2007 J, ' >~~ H ~-: ' , , " "y ~"~~',;'::'! :~O" ;::~~~;i=i~,,\,>:",,~p:,;f;:~:\<",~' ^,:o~~i:''':4 ~ ':""";~-'"";ji"~i~}} -" , ." ;",;, )<. i, "to:_' )jrRAV:lZlY q:t~~~1J1:0j[y _ ~",,~ ';; ~ \, ~ '~~"~=~",-:;;V?,""i~~l'.. ~"k~C"~""'<' '<1",,<~~ "~~~'''''~J'''(~'"<'f' SOLVANG/SANTA YNEZ VALLEY VENTURA COAST NAPA VALLEY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ISLAND OF MAUl To advertise in The Sunset Travel Directory,@ call ,-877-748-0737 Sunset December2oo7 "3 THE PGA PROFESSIONALS TRAVEL DIRECTORY The travel opportunities below are being offered only to PGA Professionals Temecula Valley 1:'e.mecuIa. VaHe~ coJjfQrn14 : Teinecu1a is nes_tl~ 60 miles east of San Diego's coastline ,and boasts lio~e_ of the: region's highest,ranked golf . courses as well a~,a vibrant ~~~-growir1g industry. Teme,cwa Vailey is an outdoor _ enthllsi~ ast's playground fUll of dayandnighttiJne activitiesforallages. yisii: M;temecula~b.coIn_or call {888l363~2852fQ:r: mo.re information. The Resort at Squaw Creek OIympip valley, c:;a1if~rnia The Resort at Squaw Creek, designed by Rqbert Trent 1011esfr. ~a8namedone of "TheTop 10 Courses YouCan P4y,"and is set in naturally spectacUlar surround- ings,"PGA. ProfessioIllllsbring a group of 12 or more golfers and we willin,clude your roundandlodg:i.JIg, One hour from ReD.O.. c:aI1866"93H6,53 for reservations orvisitWl'iW,golfthehighsierra.comfor information. Whitehawk Ranch Golf Club Clio;Ctilifornia i'Ranked 18th Best Golf Course in Califoiriia" by Golf Digest, Whitehawk Rim.ch is a DiCk Balley design that is pUre golf at itSflnest. Lodging is avail- able onsite.PGA,Pro~essionals bring a group of12 or more and golf and lodging is complimentary. .ReIer a group and golf andlo4ging at a future date is compli- mentary. Call 866-931,4653forreserva- tions or Visit WWW.golfthehighsiena.coIil. for information. I-Iapun" Golf Course at Mauna Kea Resort Kohala Coast, Big l1>land of Hawaii Beautifulandch.allengingcourse designell by Arnold Palmer and Ed Seay. Links-sty1e play with ocean views from every hole. Golf Magazine "America's Best Golf Resorts" #21, Golf Digest "Best Golf ResOIts in North America." Call PGA Professional for courtesy 808-882.5400. To11Free: 1.866,PRINCE-6 www.PrinceResoItsHawaii.com Hawaii Prince Golf Club ()#~,~aifaii })esigned by golf lege~dsAInold Palmer and EdSeay,thefl~"I\'aiiPrinceGol1 Club provides 27hole:>ofchampionsmp play. The uniqu.e.nirJ.e--bol~Jayouts creat.e a variety of playing experience for allskilllevels. PI~as~callourPGA professional,forcClurtesy, 808~944-4567. ToIlPree: 1.S6<hPRlNCE:-6 www.PrinceResortsHawaii.com Turtle Bay Resort Kahiiku,q'ahu'II~waii Experience Turtle Bay Resort's tWo leg- eridaryl8-holecbampionship golf cours, es designed by Palmer and Fazio. True Hawai'i is emerald green fairways stretching toward an azute sea, one of the best places to golf on earth. Turtl~ayResortPGA.com 866.417.7947 The Coeur d'AIElne Resort Coeur d'Alime, Idaho Bring 89J"-fiioreplayers to play the world renOwned Floating Green and the Pro stays and plays FREE. Plus we'll pay you fOIyaur time. Offetavailable anytime~ Reserv~tions!info:800,935-62tBor e,maiILstavros@cdaresort.com. Arr()y"Sr;,cek CO\lntry Club Reno, Nevada Locatedonly 15-ntinrites from downtown Reno and 25 minutes from north Lake Tahoe, the Arnold Pahner designed Legend COUISecombines wonderlul condi- tioningwithbreathtakingvisw. Youcan test YOJ,lr gamefrpm the Thilmament tees orselectain6releisurelysetting.PGA Professionals that bring or refer a group of 12 or more to ArrowCreek will receive a giftpackage. Gall,866~93~4653.fqr details or visit www.goIftheb1ghsierra.cmn. Bear's BeSt L~Ye~Cls,Neva4a For a uniqu~ gOlf experience, play 18 precisely replicated ,holes. selected by designer Jack Nicklausrrom his more than 200 course designs, Corporate and leisure outings welCOmed. . Located twenty minutes fromtbe Las Vegas strip. Please feel rree to contact us at 702,804-8500 for more infoTI:i:tation. 866-385-8500 wwW.hearsbes-t.com CasaBlanca Golf Club MeSquite, J',Tevadt;l One HourNortb, olLaS Vega:s The CasaBlanca Golf Club, designed by Cal Olson meanders naturally through ab.d arourid the Vrrgin River, and is accom.modatingtogolfexsafallskill levels. FREE Room and GoIf for PGA Professionals. wwW.goIfmesquitenevada.com ContiLct:GolfSales 866-720-7111, ext.2 Special Advertising Supplement to PGA Magazine C~sc~t~ BoD1derCity, l\[evada As YClU... soak .in . the . picturesque mountaip vistas and hear the. waterfall roaring through the opulent clubhouse, one thing becomes immediatelyappar- ent: Cascata has no equal. It's no wonder Sports Illustrated called Cascata "golf's hidden treasure." For information and reservations, please call (702) 294-2007 or visit cascatagolf.com. Incentive plans for PGA membexs. wWw.golfcascata.coIil. and www.riosecco.net D~Ytc;irlV~II~yGc;ilf Club Dayton, Nevada Arnold Paliner's spectacular high desert design at Dayton Valley has been the site of PGA Tour Qualifying since 1995. Conveniently located just east of Carson City and 45 minutes from Reno and Lake Tahoe. PGA Professionals bring a group of 12 or more and your golf and lodging is complimentary. Call 866-931-iUS3 far reservations or visit www.golfthehighsiena.coinfor information. '" E .g '" 'S ~ 0 .E "' ;: .E '" '" '" - -(; '" g> "" c: 0 '" c: c: <> 1) u. .. 0 32 32 f- - '" t! v 1:: '" '" Q. " " '" '" '" '" '" 0 ! - 0 -i; .c .c .c .c <;; <> & f- U U '" U < Q Q Q Q Q Q e % 0;" ::$ "'~ 0 .0'1-"" <>&!l. .c """ .. J:iU ... 8 :::: .. '" lot- E !1) ~ '(; oJ! E ;; c: ~ 0....'(; C1: Es ~'6~ ! .... ti~~ :U Ll.V> g ~ = ~1 N :a:P i: "ill"- <>,:;; LU m ~ -=-11 "'.Il z" :g E" -- >- G>1!j! " E ill O:! 15 :a:'" '" " ~.~ '" O~ 1- .c.ll.l' ItI < .. r-~l5 " <l k :a:~ >- 'l> '" ~ i:' " ~ ]1 " =: '" E- V E - (1):12 a.~ 0]; .!5? .co U1:: -'" . '" ~.. - " ='.!tl ~lD C.;( .. '" ti;5lt'1 C>- ~..e: ..e~ "C>- c:~ ~'5 ..'" .- '" .c'" >~ "'I- (i)-a Cf,I:E (3$ :.::k .- >- ">- Z.., Z.., , BOOK YOUR iJR'IP TODAY! ~ .888.363.~81~ ," - "'~, - ~ ~ ':..\ - ~ $_ CM GOLF~ com Tours & ~(',;-s OeqmOffidal ,.Y-~5~~,!:~~~~~~.~ MO\TfllY ~~.:f~~L~,g~o? O:il'~ the gift of ~.2~!c,~~~~.~,~-" jAJ!cat2!!orie-s ~: 8earch~ InstructiOD :EquipmeJ:lt Course:: & Trawl USGA Handicap Leaderboards i Schedules&Resl31ts FedEXCup sta.Is: ToufAnslyz.er r PIsye.rProl'iles T\lListln9s :::,,""~ :;;',";"~i CJ~:,.~,o "a~;"'"' 1":..,,q:iC"~' '''~'''' c'.,,~':O,;,' i,1i',,~ ',""," ,,~ ,-""""",.- Related articles > leaderboard: Final President's Cup scores > Photos: Final Day at the Presidents Cup > Toms. Verplsnk top Presidents Cup scoring . Hjorth ends Ochoa's LPGA winning slreek > Campbell charges up money list I',;th win > Bamberger Rol)' and Woody become team players > f.'lQre tours & news flrticiell Sporlsomdl.lnks I Had High Blood Pressure xO>'it's dO\\nto 131; ~~.F:lndomh9"'Ididit,,itlwut dr-..I~~ Refinance Rates 5.5% Fixed! S3~~,OO{lmort~agefo!57Si'Il1".~{l S~r~d.G&!' FREE quofH no',"; ellYalink~"" Big win for the Americans, and for Weir MONTREAL W')- The United States wonlhe Presidents Cup. Mike Weir gave Canada quile a consolation prize. ;:,i~, lc,i';:~2~ $j~;;I" ;=9~~ E.,,;.il",,;.:H The p.mericanswon enough oftM sln1l1es matches Sunday to capture tha Presidllnls CUp fortl1.e secontl mighUime, gMng them an intemaUonalvicl:oryin cup ccmpelitlonforitle first time since 1993. Thaldidntstop ttH::i relentless cheers'!flalrockecl RO}<l1 Montreal on a spectacular autumn day, especiaJly'Nhen WEllrwon thetinaltwo holes to beatT1gerWoods and sendlllsrouolryhomefeellngJlkeawlnner. Weir won lhe Mastersfouryears ago. and hewasnlsure which fettsweeter. 1t"s lighl:there with a"Weir said. "OlrJlously. w1nning the Masters was such a thrill. but to play Tiger ... he's the best player there Is. ancl I l1ad to play my absolute best today to beathim." He needed some help from the wolld'"s NO.1 player. \'VIlhthe matcl1 all square andWeirsafelyin the 181h falr....ay, Woods pulled his tee shot and watched It land In a pond. just a fewyards short of a CanadIan flag fans v.-ere holding behind lhe ropes. Weir hit his- approach to 15 feet, and after Woods' chip for psrstopped rolling 2 inches from the cup. he oonceded the putt. Elythen, ltIe Amerlcans were cele.bf31:ing somethlngfarmore Important. "Ilost,"Woods said after changlng into sneakers. ~auttheteam won the OJP, and thafsthelmporlarltthing: The IntemaUonal team won saven matches, not neartr' enough to avoid the lnevitabla: United states 19112.lntemational 14112. ForltleAmertcans. ltwas anothervidol)'forthelrbeloved captain, JaCk t~icklaus. who now Is 2-1-1 in the Presidents Cup. Ita/so was the Iirsttime Nick!aus won in Canada. He was runner-up seven times In the Canadian Open, induding a playoff loss at Royal Montreal In 1975. Woods al'ldWelr shared a hug on the 18th green ae lhousands oHans crammed inlo the bleachers. The crowd covered every blade of grass aroundttie green and chanred, "Mikel Mikel hUkef , told him Iwas proud of how he handled himself:Wood said. ria hadto C81i)' and entire country onhls shoulders. NetiC/a mall)'lleople ca~ playas well as hs did. Ha h,mdIW itmagnllice!ltly.~ The Americens wers superb. ScoltVerplanKcompleted a 4-Oweskwitli birdlt>s on the 16th and 17th to. beat Reflo' SabbatinJ.2 arid 1. Phil Mickelson hammered Vijar Singh. clOsing him out 00 \he 14th MIe WhIle wearing solt spifo:es. Wood~ Austin finally lostln a meaningless matdi againsl U.S. Open dlamplon Angel Cabrera. but he- continued to keep 1he Canacllan crowd entertained. Walking up ltw 14th fallWaY, ft.ustin put on a maskto mock his plungelnto1helake onlhe 1<Wl hole Fnl!ay. Sponsored Unks I ffad High Stood Pressum Now It's down to 120t75. Find outflOW! did ltYdlfioul drugs WWW,fSSll-erate.ccm 112 !J~.;.xf::l> Refimmce Rates 5.5%. Fixed! S300,OOGmort9"ag& for S7B9!mo. No SSN required. Get4FREE... I'Iww.tend2(i.= Atteme,1fve to Open Back Surgery The WGrtd leaaer of Arlhroscop!c.ProCEdure$ for Bad: and Neck... www.~pi.leinstMlS...Cl1m C'Olltt'"sts and PrOlllottOllS 'T.;e-llnw8p;';:l,,!:;[nY'X'.rJ..faa . FinnaG(!lfCoufs;in!our:HGa > Sigr;UP.rHlhs-FriiEU.,Ws;'IttH Sura link II.....", lTIvSI Golf AJj day. Every day. Course Finder Get Golf Magazine fur Just $1O! Buh~u,h<~ I~"",:> . Sports -Fantas)' -MlB -NFl:. -NBA -NHL -College football -CoflegeBasketb12l! -High Schools -MotorSj}olt13 -GaIf -MoreSlJOl1.s '-':.-0-\<'- . .. ~" . ,.i '-:',: , CC~FT!ON By G-SJI' .1:.,. VE:.Ol.leZ, US Pr",Hwlr.;; pllc10 I C;.n;'Y:-.;,nt, ~ 8: r;.;;O~-n1-n-,el1"'O Southern Cal's trouble spots harder to hide after upset E';,' Ds....i.:J L",c.r ioJ,;,.::.!: us..::.. T:JG!o:{ . BOOTY SITS; TCciil~$ CS ~,~.;::,ir:Q i:.' <~"'';;'~Y f",!i.;f;: . /tiS-JOE THE Pt>.G-10: !';~\"~ r,:{=~ Ir;:>". "Tc-,'r.:;' lh,;; ,x-rf..fer~ I 'i~~7~;'~~~nd~ierrti'llls -"""""r~/il"""-""" . SlXIf"eS: AL NL NFL 1.'VN8A MLS PGA 'View all scores . E$sl!rntia:!s: S-c:-r" So:c.c; '~,I:-~ . '3l'9~:ii"' 'Hirg! . T\' fj~;i':"';:!" . P~,H~ P,.;;;:;- t:-,::,lii t:b2 ';S"'-6. ~,-=t&"r.~ . !;;-]';;:M:~:,,; :.~.-;i, E-~h..'ie; ~Hat:,~s<::: . T'~"s-<'r:::i:;:r::; . U,O;;: .:-:OJ, . -~_~_.:-,t.; 1'-',0=/, ::d'-''''f''i~tir,~.;,' 1'.r6~1\?~;usrT8DAv '""';--'-;)"';;":""0' k;'{-"" ~';::::\ii,:i~-'<':'Y;-'-- POWER RANKlNGS .~ Early impact TExans: Olmye dishing Guthar;j hits-in tif-stye.ar_ Pats on top Unbeatsfls lead file way: P;;-cker~ taKs a tumble. Chat v/ith Charley Stetner Broa\icasrertalks !]layoff~. 'Nej.. 11:30 a.ffi. IT. NFL chat Rescheduled: OS'li$ on I,'';e-ek € - V'1e-d .2 l3'.I11. . Headlines · . .. MIP~~ t~e.1IVeb . . SpO(t$ N,,*~ . falcons :::'::",',~;",:"'!. ~ 95i P~,:<;:'n','1c.;,..'c.o 41 Vick must repay Falcons $20 million from bonus yankees 1 c-:,"(1!"-=!1~ ~ 26! R",c;;,rrm;;f";:{} 5 Yankees GM: Decision on Torre's future still in limbo olympiC:!! i C-:'r"r,.;;n!; CiQ 66: ?",e;:,cr;m'~"':; {} 11 Doping confession fallout continues for Jones footbaJ! ! C:'-r.,m",i':! 9177t R~e:,',"",c;','-"r--:; {} 23 Alabama, Louisville flunk SeA's latest report card I playoffs I C~;".'Y..;,r; ~I ;;:-:,:'~~-"".;;n: {;:. NL rooKies shoWing the stuff of veterans 8e it dispJ8\,ing leadership ['';:'jc,rpj tlleir :-'631"8, <:or I-dtting a series.tuminQ rl'Jme run in a p(8;',:,ff del:rlJt. Troy TulGvAizlli and Chris \{0urp~", (lascar I :::.G'T~--:('" l]f) 11 R;l,x:;."'--:r:~.o Franchitti to maKe NASCAR debut in Martinsville's truck race IndyCar Series c11ampion DanG frS!1ci-lltti '/'-'ilI In;)!',€- rds Ni.,SO".F:: c!etlut fn thE- Cf;3\tsman TfU(;!( :3eries race 3t ii;\artirisvill6 (\/8.'; Speed;;vw.:.., ...., s.aints! C~.m"'"~nt;~ 11 R<;iC;:'~'~':':;'''':;O 2 Reggie Bush's NCAA case not going away !=:;:_'\"'ol;,;H05('.owir,:;,'",c.;,r;,; ,~. sports n1afKeterwho aUeg,;;,dh made irnpr-:'per p3~Tn6nt8 tG Reggie 8u$h v,tlHB t1"16 Hels(((:?n Tr,::prt," 'Ninner "t"SS still 31 Southsrn CBlifom13 has.. rocl,ie:s I C';''-'''''''='''~l !=,,,,';::'T'\',,,,;,i) 2 Rockies' idea ot fair play: Put baseballs in humidor E-, \,'i,:;J f,/j,;;-~-;;!i= '';'::~, r:)c_~y T!1e n3Bis'l1umi(i.;:,( iOh'C!:.6;:- [in3Q62 of st1wkE:- tiffed. "NoQd.p;3n€-!~d rCGlrts. a p!;j.)" 'HoarE- f11J$li&d aeG!s are n13de 3J1(j %(:r8t~ ;.ue tf3,j6<::! onl/witiL yankees I c;"""';o.r,,;~ 9! ;:;-=-c-:,.'''~...c:o- A~RodJs future in New York uncertain 8'i 2..:,c hi;'(':''''r,~~ls !~,,=,:;, T::'C", Lle/. Rc(ir1:;'iue.: 8:,--;8 filiB,j ';~:W-i 1.&2[:3 :3ft'S[ H-Ie i'8tlb3eS ;NEire (ilsmiS::60 !}::tll& (:!,:,;';;!;:::.nD In,j!ans in H'p:, ni\'!::;(rYI ':;~.i"i<?:~ 1-,;::;r1 ,~(([l,hnu-::;; Ati....erti~maIt ii~ p, m ~ .8 <lj .f! o n 'E ~,,) ::Jl7' i;'~ ~ ~ t~ :t;.a- ~ ~ '5'g c: fi,i 11;I;; ! ~ 1F !~ j ~2 J~ i 'c. ,,'" --.t:t S:bi ~ S ;;% ftl", 2:0 o ~ '" .c ro '" '>i $ " @ ~ ~ ~)) 1 ~ ;;; l.> .1!! ~ u.. ill .s:: ~ (3 ,>, :::J (J " I- 0 ;., :2 .. >- 'l:l .... :::: g <( .:l ;>, ':! ~ .i!' f/l .. "'" .. ::J Q) ill " E a: n .. ... 8 oS " ~. ill C" .e E .~ t <: '" ::i i= tp 0. cO '" "< .. <l.' .}$ u t: '" if> .0 '" (D. '" ~ ~ <l> Ol <> - IIi '" - '" '0 ,!; '" .. .~ v <= ;;; ,.. 0 ~ ~ '" tl '" .... . :>- <l> tl "'- '" j;t:. s '" jO: - 0 .<: '" 0: ill <l> Ilif ~ ""~~',,, ill " i:(8~ - ro \~,".,,0 - '" rJ:. 00 $: 0.. '" r3 Q' .!J} Z ~ ill " 0:: .. -. 00 ~ (0 .0 ~ Co -, tl~ ~ E OJ 00 Co :S 0; 1,:.iaU<:,;!!{tR.\V'ij I '" 'ft -'" .. ~ u '" "" ~ ... - ll! '" '" .2 .:u 18 '" 00 ... ~ C ro i.! 0 '" .>~t '" .z " In " '1.\ -E1 ~ (l) lL ,::( - ~ '" Q> ~ (,9 ~ (D ~ 0 $: u 'l> (!) ~ U ;;; "" C I)) ~ 0:: ...' ';Q "" E 'E ~i "'> 00 W C ~ E ::i .E ~ .~ ~ " ~ Ol' " ," ::J j c: IX -g <0; ~ 'U;; U '" 'S: 0 :i! z X '"" E 'E: lJJ '" E ~ '" 0 E5 '" " cr, 0 G)' :;:0 ro 0 '" E > ri .. <0; t; ::J: '" " 't!: '-' :>- - <( ~ ..<:E " 2! CO t " (f) " '0: ~ :0 I- :J: '" ~ E c' '" <Ii' 15 iD <( 05 D ~ ....: " ,; Q. "" I-: "', 'u "'- "- _: 5 " IX (!) De <Ii' 0 ~ ;> ~ 0::' .t;! " 0 ~ C ~ "0 CV tA tA ! Q. E .- us ~ CV Q c - " .ccu~ ~ ..... 8 C ::.' &' .- C ~"' cv"E ~J! =~ WI .: ~ LLI.i: g fij ; ,~ m -,S ~ !l i ~ *Ji~ '" " o tj) :~ 01 'a:i is '0 " " ';;: ., ~ "" !3i!:,1 E ;t ~ . f/) .~ "' ~ ~ .'" S: ~ ll! Q. ]l .. 'u 0:> 00 ~ ;i ... ~ '" 0:> .... ~ '0 _ ~Q)O 0000 _:rot: tl)..x: 0 Q;I OOQ)N. Erom.g-g a;dIl E CD ~ ~ >:P 0...... ~ :;::;.r::..J::..t: 0'1 (I)__$:Q) ~ero'O.c _'O~~-;; -Q)rt\ft\- I 'E """ '0 oI::moQ;! oo,,!:::o;...E . OJ -' Q) ;:I oo~",:s:.o OOQ;l1i)Qi;:.., G ~ e ~€ ZQ)o>>ro cc:~u..~~ o..o;.mwm ti)(,I)t:roQ;l )-eo f.fJ OQ)1ii:S:=; :r:Sz~~ ~ " L::; " \ll C " u i) " '" , ti':, ,.-J [\j o 21 ,!) 1;; it ... :a " " '" '" E :6g ';l:1;; 000. "''''- Ee 0'0 .<:~ ",0 o . ro-o "'O~ =c.......~t6 ,-rooo~ij; ~Q)OOo..a. C(5rowQ. ""O-s:o.o.;.ID 'ODD 0..:= c: l:: OJ c.......ttI'roa. (D~tl)Ou ..Q...... Q;I c: ro o;g~.Q (I) 't::--ro .0 fJ) ::; "tl w:!:::roeo .!..m-ro(() mci)B'-U) e--E--i!o ii,):r=]iro.r:: roi2~~'O mroS:5E ~E.,'!'::; - "'0 ~"'O 0 . "'itio""Q;lEQ;I cn..c:~l::.2~ (Dcc:Eo'Q. F.~U~.st':l .:< o o .Q " ... .:: <,-:jo -\;.:>-- iiil - c:"S:t::jg (D m 01....... ~ti.!i::Ja 0lQ)~@ r::~tl)"O -$: ~-d (ij (tI-w- J:::{gll)~ gl.~ ~ E .-:- _ a ro EOj;:.E gc::::.: Q)" ~.~~:S li='Ocor::: .s~:!:i1~ ~oa;~OJ ~ g>>E.2 ~ >IDWU>- Q)'Of;j$~ :EB.cEE "'(p 0 c.l- (ii'O.c: 0l.E' '-(lj;$:c't) .f2"5~t5E 1.>> 0' a;. ro 0 ~.oE-;rl- -co en-ID 00 .s "0 r+= t1l c: V)IDQ;lCQ) ..0: Q.~ 0 (i) ~!:?wa;..o (I)~E(j)~ .J:: Q;l o.ls;: ro )-"OWO.E:: , '0' ~ C ~ ~ ~ , '" , . ~ 0' '" , "'. 0::' -t 0, Q) .~ ~'t 0' Ol' ~c 2'~ -- . 't:;l (: W , , , u:i~ ~:; ~ " o , !!: , '=:-1 .. , '" , ~~ :s .! - , IJ) , ooJ: :c~ rt "- ~,f 2 o m %: 1/1 m ffi' g ~ ij~ ,r; .;.i.& t;; ::,,_'11 ..1>.c::i :- t: g'> t,) v 1t. '1! 1j; ~ J!' ?'.!t iJJ '?':.9 .:;. - - ;~-'- 19 1'$ ::J E ,~-E r.,"ll Il' g CJ ill.W E ~1 .!::. t:: E r.n \:< - m ~I Ij) fr;g! ~ ~ t :? ."5 ijj QJ J) '__ !ll Ql ~{~ 1; t" e ~, -n ~ t. '::,',. it !;;: . ;:<) :~ '-~ m . * 'TIim B~ 2B 6. ;:!< <1, :5""' 19 " ow ,) b if; iff f1 ~ 2 .c jliCQ .b '.~ n; l...' t., 8 .2 "* :~ (.. on r.:i ;:;, i:-- u. u) n' 'f' .::; l;:: ;... '" '" '" ~ en '" -0 '" .5 C o 0. o .c (/) , .(Ii. J 101 1;) '1 J;U1 at! '" 0:' , , I ! , I- 2., r. S;'j \ '" I w ! 751 I ~I -t'iiaw?sw:e,\~ ~> '-t' .;:) is ~,?! 41 r::: E ~ .c:,a- 1IJ.... ;'E E~ Q::S rQ_ ~ ~ 1IJ:g U5 Eli: ~ ilJQ to :Jig ~ .~ di .s H (D ~ '" co .~ ;. '" ~{! .0 0 7fi .., ,- . -, '" '" ,'. '" .- !:: c' '00 c~ '" '. 0:. - 'E .li ,-" E .:. '" <~, . ,', '." 2J 0 ... ~ "' '" <D W -:; ;;; ~ '" oc ~ . Ol ,,; il; 0 ., t:: N 0 0 ~ 13 s IJl ~ ~ en !:: " "0:, 0 '" ., '" 00 '" '" 2: ~ + . ~ '" '" '- '" "' u ... . '" ~ '" " ~ '\jj ~I '" ::;: . ;; '" ~ '" '" "" >. 11 e: '" , "'- ...' 5 j 'El u 0: . I ~: >. ,21 E i ...t 0 !ii ~ c. : :gj u w ' ~' . ' , "' i (pi - ' jj' ~ L--.J '- W '" :;s b . := ;>. a a> <:t l: I- l.lJ 0 t.!l :a: III m0. ~tJ> .c u ~, I- III '" ::J III '" t: o f!i III ;:>-, Q) e o 2: III u> :1> co l'= III tl} ~ i:i~ Z III ". := c; I III (,. !!:' {:. ~~ Q' '" u: - '" (5 ~...' u Ill' .:.:;' c' :::i! oi C! 'iij 'fi G)i >i -C:i <ci -C:' 0Jl; ..-, "l, 'i'f 1%:' ..~~ '" ,)"! co '" 2:' lit "0 ~ '" IX '0 ue i2~ w: 0., E D:l28 :Erne:: <C~'-' _w@ e S--.!!! cnE~ ii5~<t; '0 '0." E:o~ Od~ I ~ c 0 'm "0 'e ~ 0 "- '" .e i! "a . ., m '" e . if :) g> C) " '" c: -.; ., ~ to) s ..... e <:> " " Q.. (jl E C c g .\If .- " tJ> i'il tJ> ijif ! ... c (i< C) E C e t:~ Li 0 Q. ~ 9<' '" - E ~ Q. \t, ..... Q. ;;:.;', 9 ::s .~1 - it< m tJ> c w. -2 :::; <f .!~ 9.0 ..". ro 0;3: '" '" 2! g .,0:: 5 'J;l en i= .5~ O~ '$::J .0: e ~o .. U) E gco8 't;.~"'0 . a:; "'~"'2 :t:9-'.e ~ ~ ~ ..... OJ ::r c.... Q} L2!5o.r:: 0. !D "": 0:: d)~ ~b::f t .. E .~ J ~ ;; !II '" " -'" ~ :> r: 0 - oS 0 ';> ~ 0 ~ :~ !II .Q " i;' '" ~ '0 " .!:! '" ;; '0 <) .-.' , :;; , " & if!. -," I; i5 '0 '" ,0- . ~ ED = t,~J .. , 0 ;- ~ Q o I- ~ ::> to '0'0 0'" 000-0 ,,-00 0.0 ~ e- . _ o..$~ oem::) 0)0000 m::;::; .c::_ f.Q .e ;:; OJ '--e:C m.!:2m:e IDC>(i) ~E ~ 01 CD '0 "'- E . :>..:{ 0.. 0 ~ IDt:nQi~a) 22.J::mE ~o.aa~ E"OfijC.C: ~lii;;;;ii8 Cl W cri (J) . "'::> ::>.0"- m"OUJ --0:' "'50) ~;;;;w 13"'!;;; <Del- ~ 0 '^ ~ mV'"" BlOCl c~w ",-,">1;: Eol!!Z ",-",::> ::c wS' "'~'O "'C.e~ 01::::: <- 00(0: u.. Q. E !t!! E .<: " '" .!!! '5 .., ~ _r'-'..-.---.---..~ ,",,' II All the news that's fit to"" :u . H",; . Ii,.: Ii T.'" . 1.0,,, . ,,-~.- . '.f, . """ "':. ,,',' T,~\'lil " Fligt.t ClintH ..ii<^~'~;""_" >h'c:" ~'.:l'", ", ;.,.". "";'~' ,"" !.'" AirTran, JatBlua good for Portland .oo but bad for Bangor? ""'~_""_. "0"''''''''''''"'''''_" -1-IM"11i1II! &m$~RloIlO\>rJI')-'Il""-"fIU_"m.J~lI<om:otion>I..........&opr.lng.n;.>......>tHl"f*l.ff""',_ '""_""__""'__,"""""f"""P_klI"'-'~JoIpo!I. 'l'.........._........4.7~lnlll>1i'sl1T"'_oI....~....;>Od"""'....al<l.2"droj>......,.Ilob".........._r. !:Irgo<I_.~'ptriIr>oo<I.n.._'"__lohl.-f. """_y.....<li_"""04I'111l1>op:mongtrIll>l'l!l<n:..RIdE....on""_""P!>................f.,.."""'...tIIo <<Ilo4oIo<<....pilotIQ.. l1>oto...oI'port.........,~b.....'IjIIl"'"""'--.,.....f.......~..,Iow''''bo.dit<~......._...,...'''''''. _..-._~........_'''''''_o__..._,. NfD<h.....pbIQI<l..r_..'....IIooo__JotIlm",.;".,-".,_Y>""""""_.ThoJdBluo'"'*'" _......,"""".__...."""""..._1lid<."""'f'4oWtI4l........... ,,'uo ~~R~sro~'W~,;.......... _.1 """ Ii< "".I......~.., r..........Ihf=I_';~ I_l'_....,~ tiop<>rir......""j"'._....f'O<l """"""Jtt<.....,..__..............................."...'....._d."_J._Y,.....-''''''':WJ><n _..I_....._~1/irDII.IIftd._oMP<<II""'...ll"'lI"'. """~~..OOO\l..IMOY_...dl<lr......_y~.................___.'l"tIt;I-. -_-.___I........."..........:.biIt';......';s._,....fli,:/u""'...-~_.....:""_. ..~.M.o_...I,l.__.I<<<"""'....S>nQo<<_",..."J'pI""".....-......._,_mboprop >Ioom't.__oonsl_tlJtb<"...oI>lor""~m.h<t.RldDtb~Sol'YT>lt"".ThIl_"""""""" .....~f__..................""'__.__. In_.._''',,''~~......,..,.................,,__'olool......_''''~;nd'''''' ..pIOll>lItf....~........~"~."U';oieI<homt.o<>o1_.v1.a"bIn"'.....f<I<Ilombo_.IIJpp_. ~~.............*.oMoo.&I~.......__.~_,......o;opooily>Odby.._.".....mo.-.o,,"" -.:-"*'" o.I.....loo"""':_D>IIir.....~"__...oom <:On,;;,.,,=Ti>>_""'~_J;;_~.7!I);~."'l'mt~~.!<....,.,.,.....""""'""'_"'"". ~"I",,"lf"'JID ','."",' "'"'.' ..-~,',-. ':"''''''"'''00'''''''.'' ,_t;."i':'u", ,"",,"~, "",.".:,-""". ,,,,,,,, "-j""m~~,,..,,:..d'., ,,;, "",,,- fl,,,. ~', ''''''f.'' "'''''''''f''''',I'., (11'.'" 1;0;''''''''''''''''-;; "1"'1""..1,.; l~"""""'''''' "",,,,., ""~ _"""'".'''lJIIKl'ntol......~~.Lo;lnlR...'''' ,- , I , I i """I ~('l sr.o.;-,;,'I__~ B1Topm.o"n!iTORI~S .lIo<tn>d ....,:t,_",,:,j '';'P~ T,.:;;,'"'I1'~h 1-:".' ~'''c.,,' ,.,_~" tn.;-. ".,. "'1-1.. ,;.;;;<,,,,.,,.,,,[-.,, ,.! , '~"'-<"" ''''''''~_MI,''y,''''".-j~,T'''''. ~"',.oJl;'T' 0".'_.' .'-".c"'. 0 i"'"0 u,..o',..J,. ',,~'", r" II>oo!Y.~~~?'~' -,:.,.' .,.",. he, ,:~:~<"." 1Ia....,.....w""'!", 0." ,- ".;;,. .........,. H<<<IftKon,";oos..--.i..,," "...:..;.~~~~= l",,"I"'_"~"""'W',"'" ",.-,"R;<.: ~~~<"'.....1u.....U'''''''J..ll<Pt.'',,-'''.....'''''''''"'~ :w!if-:"'-".'Ir""DElI,EP.S.mMloI'IIft,.<o"MI\lio'-"!M -.--------.-----------------.---- -_...~.._._._-"--_...~~--..__._-_.._..._.._._. l;)"')fF.Ito,."AlK~IlVmr; Hct~C'~'_~'..j '''''"z ~'"W.:4-rI<OCE"'......'.,;,,~''"'<I<~,.ro;:"' >'1'1<><100"" $l1~."'+:~.MlJE'~Vt]r.>ll>......~Sor"""~_ - Slgll.9f<>r""'Top~...nl......l I'<n>il",~""'< ~.'~'."e~"w;",.o"'" ''''.<1 ,.""-",.""."""""",.",,,,,,,, ,.,~,..;"J,~",,,,.., ',.,oc""''-. ~j~--- SECTION 4 Temecula Valley CVB 2007/2008 Tradeshow Calendar Event Date Description 2007 Trade Shows Orange County Register Travel January 20-21, 2007 Leisure Travel Show located at the Orange County Fair Grounds, which drew more than 600 attendees including travel agents Show Los Angeles Times Travel Show February 10-11, 2007 Leisure Travel Show located at the Long Beach Convention, which drew more than 12,000 upscale and travel-minded attendees CalTlA Conference on Tourism MPI So Cal Chapter Trade Show Bay Area Travel Show California Marketplace Trade Show International Pow Wow Affordable Meetings West The Motiviation Show National Federation of Republican Women March 11-13, 2007 Conference and Trade Show which offered an oustanding opportunity to promote to over 500 of the State's most qualified Corporate and Leisure Travel Professionals March 22, 2007 Conference and Trade Show located in Century City which offered a small venue trade show allowing for more one on one contact with qualified Meeting Planners from all over Southern California. March 24-25, 2007 The premier leisure-focused travel event for Northern California, which drew 7000 consumers from the affluent Bay Area and over 300 Travel Agents April15~18, 2007 Sponsored by Successful Meetings Magazine, the event provided a forum for one-an-one appointments with 15 meeting planners, and allowed for additional networking opportunities with other planners and industry colleagues April 21-26, 2007 Sponsored by Travel Industry Association (TIA) Pow Wow is the travel industry's premier international marketplace and is the largest generator of inbound US travel. Metone-on-one with 21 international and domestic buyers of travel, as well as networked with hundreds of others. The TVCVB was a final night Event Sponsor June 19-20, 2007 Sponsored by Hospitality Sales and Marketing Association International, the trade show which rotates between Northern and Southern California each year, drew hundreds of meeting planners from various markets to the San Jose Convention Center, searching for moderate to upscale accommodations and venues September 25-27, 2007 Sponsored by Incentive Travel and Meeting Executives, the show, located in Chicago, drew over 13,000 buyers of Incentive Travel, 30% of which havel annual travel budgets of$100,000 to $1 Million, and 24% with annual budgets over $1 Million. September 28, 2007 Located in Palm Springs, the 34th Biennial NFRW Convention drew over 200 attendees and provided the perfect forum to showcase the Temecula Valley. The TVCVB along with 5 wineries offered wine tasting during the opening night gala. NBC San Diego Travel Expo September 29-30, 2007 Sponsored by NBC Channel 7/39 and Mi San Diego TV 43 Spanish Station, the leisure based travel expo drew over 20, 000 attendees over a 2-day period Los Angeles Media Reception San Diego Bay Wine & Food Festival Travel Media Showcase Seasonal Spectacular October 30, 2007 Sponsored by the California Travel & Tourism Commission, The LA Media Reception drew over 50 media members from California and Canada, and offered a forum for "pitching" destination story ideas. The TVCVB won the Grand Prize for Best Trade Show Booth. November 17, 2007 The festival was an internationl showcase of the world's premier wine and spirits producers, chefs and culinary personalities, and was the perfect venue to showcase 6 Temecula Valley Wineries. Produced by World of Wine Events, the festival benefited the American Institute of Wine & Food culinary arts scholarship program. November 27-30, 2007 Located at Morongo Resort and Casino, the Travel Media Showcase offered a unique opportunity for top travel journalists and travel industry professionals to meet one-on-one at a single location for the purpose of exchanging information and developing contacts. A Post Show FAM trip was hosted by the TVCVB. December 5, 2007 Sponsored by the California Society of Association Executives (CaISAE), Seasonal Spectacular, which takes place in Sacramento every year, drew over 1000 members of the nation's 3rd largest association community. The show is the premier association networking trade show in California and the largest on the West Coast. SECTION 5 Istrl Smith Travel Research Standard Historical TREND Job: 1043 Me Temecula Valley, CA Source: Smith Travel Research Janua 2005 - November 2007 Occu ane Room 'Rate RevPar 'Room:Su I Room:Demand Vear Month ThisYear:':O/OCh This:Year:.:.o/O',Ch ThisYeaf':,<:I/,,:Ch 'ThisWeiilr,':(%'Ch ThisWear:%'Ch 2005 January 69.2 9.0 107.56 8.2 74.47 18.0 50,065 12.2 34,664 22.3 2005 February 75,4 8.0 109,23 7.4 82.34 16,0 45,220 12.2 34,088 21.2 2005 March 74,4 1.9 108.37 8,4 79.11 10.5 50,065 12.2 37,231 14.2 2005 April 78.6 7,4 110.89 10.2 87.14 18.3 48,450 12.2 38,073 20.5 2005 May 75.5 2.0 109.34 8.8 50,065 9.9 37,813 12.2 2005 June 79.2 12.0 110.75 8,4 87.72 21.5 48,450 2,9 38,377 15,4 2005 July 81.6 10.1 112.86 8,4 92.09 19,4 50,065 2.9 40,855 13.3 2005 August 81.5 5,2 110,49 10.0 90,05 15.7 50,065 0.0 40,803 5.2 2005 September 78.7 1.9 110.88 8.1 87.25 10.2 48,450 0.0 38;128 2.0 2005 October 79,4 -0.3 115.24 13.2 91.50 13.0 50,065 0.0 39,753 -0.2 2005 November 74,4 0.8 113.98 11.8 84.79 12.6 48,450 0.0 36,044 0.7 2005 YTD 77.1 4.9 110.75 9.4 85.38 14.8 539,410 5.5 415,829 10.7 2005 December 69.0 6.6 113.77 9.0 78.50 16.2 50,065 0.0 34,541 6.6 2005 Total Year 76.4 5.1 110.99 9.3 84.79 14.9 589,475 5.0 450,370 10.4 2006 January 65.6 -5.2 92.60 -13.9 60.79 .18.4 50;,065 0.0 32,866 -5.2 2006 February 73.7 -2.3 100,69 .7.8 74.17 -9.9 45,220 0.0 33,308 -2.3 2006 March 77.8 4.6 99,15 -6.8 50,065 0.0 38,929 4.6 . 2006 April 70.0 .10,9 102.11 .7.9 71.45 -18.0 48,450 0.0 33,904 -11,0 2006 May 73.0 -3.3 103.17 -5.6 75.34 '8.8 50,065 0.0 36,560 -3.3 2006 June 78,1 -1,4 105.15 .5,1 82.09 -6,4 48,450 0,0 37,827 -1.4 2006 July 77.9 -4.5 103.86 -8.0 80.95 -12.1 50,065 0.0 39,015 -4.5 2006 August 71.7 -12,0 102.67 .7.1 73.59 -18,3 50,065 0.0 35,885 -12.1 2006 September 74.6 -5,2 105.32 -5.0 78.60 -9.9 48,450 0.0 36,158 -5.2 2006 October 74.4 -6,3 104.76 .9.1 77.96 -14.8 50,065 0.0 37,257 -6.3 2006 November- 75.4 1.3 100.88 -11.5 76.10 -10.2 48,450 0.0 36,547 1,4 2006 YTD 73.8 -4.3 101.95 -7.9 75.27 -11.8 539,410 0.0 398,256 -4.2 2006 December 58.2 -15.7 101.10 -11.1 58.89 -25.0 50,065 0.0 29,161 -15.6 2006 Total Year 72.5 -5.1 101.90 -8.2 73.88 -12.9 589,475 0.0 427,417 -5.1 2007 January 69.8 6,4 104.13 12,5 72.70 19.6 50,065 0.0 34,955 6.4 2007 February 77.1 4,6 105.84 5.1 81.65 10.1 45,220 0,0 34,887 4.7 2007 March 81.0 4.1 108.60 9.5 87.93 14.0 52,979 5.8 42,894 10.2 2007 April 70.6 0.9 105.51 3.3 74.53 4,3 51,270 5.8 36,218 6.8 2007 May 72.6 -0.5 109.88 6.5 52,979 5.8 38,466 5.2 2007 June 79.1 1.3 115.27 9.6 51,270 5.8 40,561 7,2 2007 July 75.0 .3.7 111.27 7.1 52,979 5.8 39,737 1.9 2007 August 76.7 7.0 108.32 5.5 83.04 12,8 52,979 5.8 40,617 13.2 2007 September: 73.8 -1.1 108.96 3.5 2.3 51,270 5.8 37,833 4.6 2007 October 77.4 4.0 110.25 5,2 85,37 9.5 52,979 5.8 41,024 10.1 2007 November 75.6 0.3 107.43 6.5 81.22 6.7 51,270 5.8 38,761 6.1 2007 Current YTO 75.4 2.2 108.80 6.7 81.99 8.9 565,260 4.8 425.953 7.0 Room :Revenue ;Thls:Yea.r:::'-:%:Ch i'Censl.lsipros 3,728,586 32.3 3,723,505 30.1 3,960,422 23.9 4,221,777 32.7 4,134,525 22.0 4,250,131 25.1 4,610,712 22.9 4,508,296 15.7 4,22,,487 10.3 4,581,019 13.0 4,108,164 12.6 46,054,624 21.1 3,929,887 16.2 49,984,511 20.7 3,043,439 -18,4 3,353,746 .9.9 3,859,934 -2.5 3,461,912 -18.0 3,771,771 -8.8 3,977,364 .6.4 4,052,928 -12.1 3,684,378 .18,3 3,808,017 -9.9 3,903,092 -14.8 3,686,920 -10.3 40,603,501 -11.8 2,948,214 -25.0 131 43,551,715 -12.9 3,639,858 19.6 13 3,692,388 10.1 13 4,(358,47.8 20:7 3,821,222 lQ.4 4,226,616 12,1 4,675,526 17.6 4,421,516 9.1 4,399,484 19.4 4,122,264 8.3 4,522,764 15,9 4,164,112 12.9 46,344.228 14.1 'Census\'&Sam Ceinsus:'Roollls 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,615 1,6151 1,709 1,709 1,709 1,709 1,709 1,709 15fT I Smith Travel Research Temecula Valley eVB a.outlook November 2007 Compared with November 2006 2O.Dec-07 0 ratln P8rlonnaJ\C9'~November o ural! PerlormllJ\C9-November.Y&artoOate Partie .'00 o~ ~ PercGI'lI Aw, 8 eRoomRatll RevPAR Revonue 9 1 Demand 0= anc,Percent A~, II eRoomRato ."PAll Revenue , 1 Demand PM rUes Rooms Segment 20007 "'" %C" "" '''' 'l'".C '"'' "'" %C % %C %C 2007 "'" %Ch "" '"" % 20117 "'" % %C '%C %C c.'"~ Sam III Census Sam 18 Call10mla 65,1 64.6 0, 118.38 110.55 7;1 77.11 71.3. '.0 9,' >2 ',0 ro, 70.7 .., 119.6 112.20 ao 84.43 79:36. 6.4 7;2 0,' 0, "'" 2454 477399 ""'" CarlsbadlOceaoslde '"., 58.4 ,-' 122.05 120.54 '-' 77.46 7~:~ 10.1 13.7 " 12.3 69.0 67.5 ,., 136.7 127.70 '.0 94.27 86.18 ~: H, ... ", ... " '" 02"" ""' NawportBeachlDanaPolnt "'.. 66.5 -1.7 161.66 155.42 '.0 '105.70 H". " 2.2 O. .1.8 72.4 72.0 0,' ~~:~ : 167.64 7.4 130.39 120.70 -~~ ;8. 0.2 0, .. " "" 7574 PalmSpl1ngs "',0 70.7 ,', 132.15 130.48 ", 87.20 92.2 -5.5 4,2 " -5;4 62.2 64.9 4,2 127.91 2' 81.50 ",," .4.9 '2 -7.2 '" " 13291 "'" SanDiegoNElEscoodldo 78.2 ", '"' 107.17 97.40 10.0 83.79 63~32 ". '" O. 20.3 72.7 72.9 <,' 106~3 99.90 5,' noo 72.84 5,' 6:1 O~O :0.3 " '" "" "" San Luis OblspolPaso Roblss ~., 55.7 0, 107.40 104.99 2,' 59.82 58.4 ,,' ,., M ,,' 65.6 64.0 ", 11;:; 109.59 " 74.55 70.11 " ~~:! ." ,,' '" "' ,,~ "''' Santa 8arbaralSanla Maria: MSA ,",' ,", <, 136.57 129.34 ,,' 86.52 82.5 .. ',0 '-' 0.4 70.1 ". 0:5 "', 129.95 11.3 101.45 ""," 12.-1 0,' 0,' '" " "'" '''' Val1~=~~aU&" 57.9 51.4 .5.7 112.80 112.67 0,' 55.35 ~:~ .5.5 ~, ,,' -$.6 "',0 66.2 ., 124.1 118.75 '.9 . _~1.99 78.'51 ., ::; LO 0-' " " 5774 "" "',2 55.1 2,0 114.51 109.07 '.0 ...", ,,' 11.9 ., " 63:1 .., -1.9 118.32 111.51 9,' 74.64 71:73 ." ,,' L5 ", 00 0326 5713 So"r",s","'Tr"""~"""ch The Information contained In this report is based upon independent surveys and research 110m sources considered re~abla but no rapresenta~on Is made as 10 ~scomplateness or accuracy. Thfs In/ormallon Is In no way 10 be construed as a l>loommendatioo by Smith Travel Resaarch of any industry standard and is Intended solely for the Internal purposas 01 your company and should not be published In anymamar unless authorized by Smith Travel Research, Copyrighl2007 Smith Travel Research. Istrl Job: 1043 Smith Travel Research TREND Response Report Temecula Valley, CA eresp3yr Report Start/End Date: 200501 - 200711 Date: 1212012007 . 200. 2006 2007 STRCode Name of Establishment City & State Zip/Postal Code Telephone Alii Date Open Date Rooms Chg In RmsJF MAMJJASO NDJFMAMJJASONDJF MAMJJASOND 2130 Rancho Califomla Inn Temecula"CA 92590 (951) 676c5700 200504 198306' 24 22238 Best Western Country Inn . Temecula,CA 92590 (951) 676-7378 198701 198701 74 24201 Rodeway Inn Temecufa Temecula,CA 92590 (951)676-4833 200303 ,_. 39 x x x x. x xx x x x xxx x: x x xx x x x x x x x x x xx-xx x x x 24358 QualilylnnTemecula Temecula,C~ 92590 (951) 296-378B 200709 198909 74 x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xxxxx x x x Embassy Suites Temecula Valley Wine "1;0006 24686 Coun Temecula,.GA 92591 (9S1) 676-5656 199307 17. xx x x x xxx x x x xxx x x x xxx x .x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 25053 Temecula Creek Inn Temecula, CA 92592 (951)694-1000 196906 196906 129 x x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x 26493 Motel 6 Rancho Califomia Temecula,CA 92590 (951) 676~7199 198810 198810 135 xx x x x X X X X X X X x :x, x x x xxx x x x x x x X X X X X X X X x 28124 Ramada Inn Temecula Temecula, CA 92592 (951)676-8770 199110 70 x x x [x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x CLOSED-'lndependentTsmeculaValley 40111 100 Temecula,<CA 92590 198612 .... 0 40741 Holiday Inn Express Hotel Temecula Temecula,CA 92590 (951)699-2444 200306 199906 90 x x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x 43899 Extended Stay AmericaTemecula Tamacula"CA 92590 (951)587"s881 200204 200204 107 x x x x x xx,x x x x x x.x x x x xx x x x x x xx x x x x xx x x x 44332 PechangaResort Temecula, CA 92592 (951)693-1819 200206 200206 522 x x x x x x x x x x x X 52347 South Coast Winery Resort Temecula"CA 92591 (95,1)587-9463 200405: 200405 7. 52577 Hampton Inn Suites Temecula Valley Wine Temecula,CA 92590 (951)506-2331 200406 200406 99 xx x X X X X X X X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x x x x x x X x 54806 CLOSED ,~'Independennemecula Temecula;CA 92592 198612 ... 0 54927 Fairtield Inn & Suites Temecula Temecula,CA 92589 (951)587-9800 200703 200703 94 x x x x x x x X x 55684 La Quinta Inn &, Suites Temecula Ternecula;CA 92590 (510)268~1442 204913 204913 60 [/ 56192 CLOSED - Indeoendent & Suites Temecula Temecula, CA 92590 198612 0 L-1IM x - Denotes data received by STA --Denotes no data because of seasonal closure blank - Denotes no data received by STR Source, Smllh Trav<tl R~aearch The information contained In this '''I'o~ is based upon ;ndepandanI5Urv<lya and rasaarch !rom scurcescc".ldarad m,abl. but no represemalion..madeaSlClIocomplela"...."O.acouracy.Thls Informalion Is in no way to be OOO6trued as" ,ecommendatbn bySm~h Travel Aesearch of any ..duatry standard and Is intand&<! eol~!orthe ..ternal purposes o! you, oompany and .nould nol be pub~shed In any manner unless authorll:ed by Smlll1 Traval Aea"arch. Copyright 2007 Smnh Travel R&Saarch. 15;000 10,000 5,000 o 1>~ 1>~ ~O' si~ ~~'b~ ~~(Q ~~ ~q., '::Q<t- '::Q<t- '::Q<t- '::Q<t- '!::-v ~v ~~ ~ " ") ") ~O) ~ x..,O ~ ~ )~ L'~~ ~ '!..,ei 00 ~ei 0ei " c,(Q~ ~O <:)ei *Forecasted Number . 2006 . 2007 -Source: Smith Travel Research 10/23/07 I . .....\ .....\ ~ .~ ~ e, ~ x., of... of... of... of... ., ~~ ~'>~ ~ ~v ~'~1> ~<::')-S ~C;":9e1 ~eI .":9ei ":9e1 . "" ~ ~ ") ,>0) e,~ c; e,~ e,~ dbv ~.("\'" 0 ~ v. . " "e,'< ~Q <:)eI *Forecasted Number -Source: Smith Travel Research 10/23/07 . - '."" , ,'. "';"'::""," " "-'."'-, - . ,.,,-, ,',' d':'-'- ..,. '. . " ,',' ..... ....... ',' .' ..... '. .........".,'.< . .. . ~ ~ 0' i.~ 1>~ ~e ~~ ~ rz} rz} rz} rz} . . ~v1> ~v1> _~~ ~~ ~ ^).;) ^).;) v~.s ~ ~~ ~ ~ . - ,1> e5> " "f '!vel 0(;) ~eI 0e1. << ,,-Q ~O r\eI Gj'V ,,~v *Forecasted Number -Source: Smith Travel Research 10/23/07 . I I ....\ ....\ ~ .~ ~ e ,~ ,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1Y '\ 1Y -. 'f...V ~< _t-...1> ~<::' ~..... ;:)J 'S)eI 'S)eI 'S)eI 'S)eI . .~VJ. 'f...VJ. ~1> ~ " ") ") vO) ~ x.-O ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ,&eI OV ~eI vel .~ ,,;e~ ~o (J'lJ *Forecasted Number i 1 i i l i I i I Total Room Demand Increase from 2006 to 2007= 25,435 , i Total Percentage Increase = 6% l:,2f'oLe.cas..te.CltlUJItb..eL. $50,000 $49,000,0.00 $48,000,000 $47,000,000 $46,000,000 $45,000,000 $44,000,000 $43,000,000 $42,000,000 $41,000,000 $40,000,000 YTD 20.06 .. Total Room Revenue Increase from 2006 to 2007= $5,688,487 Total Percentage Increase = 13% __----=.S..o.ur.c.e.:..5rDith Travel Reseac.cb.-10L2UD.Z....._ Tm Room Night and Occupancy Growth TIn Room Nights Booked 'an Feb Mar Apr May Jnn In! Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec TOTAL Calendar Year 2006 20,682 20.987 24.528 21,357 23,015 23,828 24,560 22.605 22,760 23,456 23,005 18,349 269,131 Calendar Year 2007 22,006 21,955 27,897 23,531 25,004 26,364 25,831 26,416 24.598 26,657 25,197 21,836 297.292 Growth Rooms 1.324 968 3,369 2,174 1.989 2,536 1,271 3,811 1,837 3,201 2.193 3.487 28,161 Room Night Growth FORECAST 6,781 Room Night Growth % FORECAST 2.52% TID Occupancy Jau Feb Mar Apr May Juu 'u! Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec TOTAL Calendar Year 2006 65.6% 73.7% 77.8% 70.0% 73.0% 78.1% 77.9% 71.7% 74.6% 74.4% 75.4% 58.2% 72.4% Calendar Year 2007 69.8% 77.1% 81.0% 70.6% 72.6% 79.1% 75.0% 76.7% 73.8% 77.4% 75.6% 63.4% 74.1% Occupancy Growth % FORECAST 6.40% 4.61% 4.11% 0.86% -0.55% 1.28% -3.72% 6.97% -1.07% 4.03% 0.27% 8.93% 2.50% Available Rooms Jau Feb Mar Apr May Juu Ju! Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec TOTAL Calendar Year 2006 31,527 28.476 31,527 30,510 31,527 30,510 31.527 31.527 30,510 31,527 30,510 31,527 371,205 Calendar Year 2007 31,527 28,476 34,441 33,330 34,441 33,330 34.441 34.441 33.330 34.441 33.330 34,441 399,969 Fairfield Rooms 2.914 2,820 2,914 2,820 2,914 2,914 2.820 2.914 2.820 2,914 28,764 Inventory Increase 7.19% SECTION 6 TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION & VISITORS' BUREAU Compiled Financial Statements For the Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 A Professional Aaounlllncy Corporation Jeff Nigro. CPA Elizabeth Nigro, CPA Christy White. CPA MURRIETA OFFICE PH, 951.698.8783 FAX,951.699.1064 25090 Jefferson Avenue Murrieta, CA 92562 SAN DIEGO OFFICE PH,619.270.8222 FAX,619.260.9085 2727 C,amino Del Rio S. Suite 219 ~n Diego, CA 921 08 MEMBERS OF . American Institute of (PAs -California Society of CPAs . California Association of School Business Officials . Community Associations Institute WEBSITE www.nnwcpa.com Licensed hI) t.he California Board of Acwuntan(y To the Board of Directors Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Temecula, California We have compiled the accompanying Statement of Financial Position of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements ofactivity and cash flows for the ten month period then ended, in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements infonnation that is the representation of the management. We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other fonn of assurance on them. The management has elected to omit substantially all ofthe disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. If the omitted disclosures were included in the financial statements, they might influence the user's conclusions about the Organization's financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. Accordingly, these financial statements are not designed for those who are not infonned about such matters. The supplementary information consists of a comparison of the annual budgeted amounts to the actual amounts for the ten month period then ended. The supplementary information also includes a breakdown of the 2006/07 grant carryover amounts and the actual expenses applied for the nine month period then ended. We have compiled the supplementary information from information that is the representation of management of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau without audit or review. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the supplementary information. We are not independent with respect to the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. /Z tr 72~ ~ JVh/k/ //c. J atmary 9, 2008 Murrieta, California TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU Statement of Financial Position December 31, 2007 ASSETS Cash Accounts Receivable Prepaid Expense Inventory Property and Equipment Furniture & Fixtures Equipment Less Accumulated Depreciation $ 81,243 130,000 306 11,782 7,881 4,183 (1,546) TOTAL ASSETS $ 233,850 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS LIABILITIES Payroll Taxes Payable Retirement Plan Payable $ 89 4,616 TOTAL LIABILITIES 4,705 NET ASSETS Unrestricted Temporarily Restricted 119,283 109,861 TOTAL NET ASSETS 229,144 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS $ 233,850 See accompanying accountants' report. -2- TEMECULA V ALLEY CONVENTION AND VISrrORS BUREAU Statement of Activities For the Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 Temporarily Unrestricted Restricted Total REVENUES, GAlNS. AND OTHER SUPPORT TID Funding $ $ 502.812 $ 502,812 City Marketing Grant 134,556 134,556 Contributions 225.000 225,000 Program Service Revenues Website Advertising 17.412 17,412 Membership Dues 7,375 7.375 Merchandise Sales 8,672 8.672 Interest Income 3,867 3,867 Net Assets Released From Restrictions: Grant Restrictions Satisfied 717,497 (717.497) TOTAL REVENUES, GAlNS, AND OTIlER SUPPORT 979,823 (80,129) 899.694 EXPENSES Cost of Merchandise Sold 4,942 4,942 Program Services Advertising-Printed Marketing 653,047 653,047 Marketing Personnel Costs 47.638 47,638 Advertising-Media 20,270 20.270 Advertising- \Vebsite 21,461 21,461 Trade Show Participation 15,197 15,197 Marketing Contractor Costs 18,291 18,291 Travel & Entertainment 10,143 10.143 Event Hosting-Local Community 5.410 5,410 Dues & Subscriptions 3.787 3,787 Promotional Items 5,190 5.190 Lodging 3,396 3,396 FAM Tours/Site Visits 2,850 2,850 Event Hosting-Industry Sales 1,869 1,869 Fulfillment 702 702 Cash Short 13 13 Operational Personnel Costs 192.362 192,362 Rent 36,067 36,067 Office Supplies 24,081 24,081 Professional Fees 25,135 25,135 Insurance 8.859 8.859 Telephone 5,047 5.047 Printing 4,330 4.330 Credit Card Processing 2,038 2,038 Postage 716 716 Repairs 200 200 TOTAL EXPENSES 1,113,039 1,113,039 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS (133,216) (80.129) (213,345) NET ASSETS AT BEGINNlNG OF YEAR 252,499 204,546 457,045 ADJUSTMENT FOR RESTATEMENT (14,556) (14,556) NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR, AS RESTATED 252,499 189,990 442,489 NET ASSETS AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 $ 119,283 $ 109,861 $ 229,144 See accompanying accountants' report. .3- TEMECULA VALLEY CONVENTION AND V1SITORS BUREAU Statement of Cash Flows For The Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Decrease in Net Assets Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash u,ed by operating activities: (Increase) decrease in operating as,ets: Account' Receivable Prepaid Expense Inventory Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: Accounts Payable Payroll Taxes Payable Deferred Revenue Retirement Plan Payable NET CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES NET DECREASE IN CASH BEGINNING CASH ENDING CASH See accompanying accountants' report. -4- $ (213,345) (40,946) 16,103 (9,306) (38,904) 38 (14,556) 2,564 (298,352) (298,352) 379,595 $ 81,243 Supplementary Information Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Budget to Actual Report For The Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 General Fund Actual Thru 12131/07 Annual Budget Income Advertising - Website Funding Investment Revenue Membership Dues Sales-Publications Merchandise Sales 17,412 225,000 2,373 7,375 15,600 300,000 12,000 20,000 72,000 8,672 Total Income Expense . Cost of Goods Sold 419,600 260,832 4,942 60,000 Advertising- Marketing Advertising-Website Advertising - Media Credit Card Processing Cash Over/Short Contract Labor Dues & Subscriptions Event Hosting, Industry Sales Event Hosting, Local Community F AM Tours/Site Visits Fulfillment Insurance Maintenance Contracts Miscellaneous Office Supplies Personnel Costs -Operational Postage Printing Professional Fees Promotional Items Rent Repairs Telecommunications Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment Lodging Total Expense Net Income 177,947 14,231 5,341 1,904 13 9,105 2,117 1,869 5,370 1,180 702 4,186 134,213 8,070 930 3,200 6,950 3,368 20,722 116,425 466 20,500 150,473 3,069 (59) 17,746 1,800 17,996 4,295 4,900 3,232 739 395,542 (134,710) 7,200 419,600 Cost of Goods Sold: Budget Includes all purchases (purchases sold and purchases in inventory) The inventory remaining at 12/31/07 is $11,782. See Accompanying Accountants' Report $ Over/(Under) Budget 1,812 (75,000) 2,373 (4,625) (20,000) (63,328) (158,768) 64,942 43,734 6,161 5,341 1,904 13 9,105 1,187 (1,331) (1,580) 1,180 702 818 222 (34,048) 466 1,269 (59) (250) (605) (3,968) 739 (24,058) (134,710) Income Funding Investment Revenue T otallncome Expense Advertlslng/Marketing Operational Total Expense Net Income Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Budget to Actual Report For The Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 TID Fund Actual Thru 12/31/07 502,812 502,812 308,890 130,020 438,910 63,902 See Accompanying Accountants' Report Annual Budget 532,000 6,000 536,000 408,600 129,400 536,000 $ Over/(Under) Budget (29,188) (6,000) (35,186) (99,710) 620 (99,090) 63,902 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Budget to Actual Report For The Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 City Marketing Fund Actual Thru 12/31/07 Annual Budget $ Over/(Under) Budget Income Funding 120,000 83,000 37,000 Total Income 120,000 83,000 37,000 Expense Advertising/Marketing 74,041 83,000 (8,959) Total Expense 74,041 83,000 (8,959) Nellncome 45,959 45,959 See Accompanying Accountants' Report Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Tourism Improvement District (TID) 2006/07 Expenses, Budget and Carryover Funds Income Funding Total Income Expense Advertising-Printed Marketing Advertising-Website Advertising - Media Bank Fees Dues & Subscriptions Event Hosting, Industry Sales Event Hosting, Local Community FAM Tours/Site Visits Office Sl!Pplies Personnel Costs Postage Printing Professional Fees Promotional items Rent Repairs & Improvements Telecommunications Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment Lodging Un budgeted Total Expense TID TID Actual expenses Original Budget Mar '06 - Feb '07 Revised Per Actual Revenue I 535,6981 535,698 535,6981 535,698 184,850 224,445 7,540 119 17,000 10,578 - 106 1,200 2,025 - 816 - 62 4,200 12 2.800 733 39.240 29,776 - 262 1,800 108 36,200 33,496 8,000 8,048 14,400 15,380 - 2,128 - 1,120 10,000 14,777 11,600 1,589 - 129 196,868 - 535,698 345,708 TID Carryover Balance TlD Actual Expenses Mar '07 - Dec '07 TID Remaining Carryover Balance (39,595) 188,363 (227,958) 7,421 - 7,421 6,422 776 5,646 (106) - (106) (825) - (825) (816) - (816) (62) - (62) 4,188 - 4,188 2,067 - 2,067 9,465 - 9,465 (262) - (262) 1,692 - 1,692 2,704 - 2,704 (48) 851 (B99) (980) - (980) (2,128) - (2,128) (1,120) - (1.120) (4,777) - (4,777 10,011 - 10,011 (129 (129) 196.868 - 196,868 189,990 189,990 (0) Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau City Marketing 2006/07 Expenses, Budget and Carryover Funds City Marketing City Marketing City Marketing City Marketing City Marketing Actual Expenses Carryover Balance Actual Expenses Remaining Original Budget Mar '06 - Feb 07 Mar '07 . Dec '07 Carryover Balance Income Revised Per Actual Revenue Funding 68.4441 83,000 I 14,:561 Tolallncome 68,444 83,000 Expense Advertising/Marketing 83.000 I 68,4441 14,5561 14'5561 :1 T olal Expense 83,000 68,444 14,556 14,556 SECTION 7 NEWS RELEASE January 11, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (951) 676-5090 www.temeculacvb.com Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Marketing Plan Sets the Stage for Growth FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif -- The Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau has approved a marketing plan that is projected to boost revenue at area hotels and motels by at least $4.7 million over the next five years. The projection was part of an 84-page marketing plan put together by Strategic Marketing Group of South Lake Tahoe that will serve as the blueprint for the bureau's efforts to brand and market the Temecula Valley as a rich and diverse tourist destination for the estimated 25 million people who live in Southern California and the thousands of business travelers who flock to the region each year. ''The plan clearly shows that a key priority for the Bureau is focusing on boosting tourism and convention business on weekdays. This will have a significant impact on the Valley's lodging sector as well as other tourism partners," said Denis Ferguson, 2007 TVCVB chairman. "None of this would have been possible without the support of the city, local lodging industry and countless volunteers who worked tirelessly on committees helping to set the stage for this marketing document" The five-year revenue projection calls for more aggressive increases in occupancy and average daily rates in local lodging properties. Based on those assumptions, CVB marketing efforts would bring in an additional $4.7 million a year to Temecula Valley hotel and motel operators. That means for every $1 the bureau invests in marketing, $7.90 would return to the local lodging industry, the report said. The growth assumptions are very conservative and could understate actual performance of the region, explained Carl Ribaudo, SMG owner and founder. With most Temecula area rooms sold out during weekends, the Bureau plans to bolster midweek occupancy rates by targeting independent travelers interested in vacation getaways and group and business travelers who may not be aware that the Temecula Valley is a convenient destination that offers a wide range of activities. "...a 5 point increase in mid week occupancy could lead to approximately $2 million plus in lodging revenue alone," the report stated. "This in turn should also stimulate demand and revenues for the other parts of the tourism economy within the greater Temecula Valley area." The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau is a non-profit organization that is the first in Inland Southern California to use a marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. Strategic Marketing Group specializes in tourism marketing strategy development for the travel, recreation and hospitality industries. Since 1992, SMG has written more marketing plans for California visitor bureaus and destination marketing organizations than anyone else. Its founder and oowner, Carl Ribaudo, has more than 15 years of experience in the travel and tourism industries. Kimberly From: Sent: To: Subject: Don McAuliffe [don@parallaxcommunications.com] Thursday, March 29, 200710:15 AM Kimberly Adams Leiber Recognized for His Contributions to Temecula Valley Tourism Attachments: douglas leiber jpg1.jpg lIB dougias lelber jpgLjpg (572 K... NEWS RELEASE March 29, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & visitors Bureau (888) 363-2852 www.temeculacvb.com Leiber Recognized for His Contributions to Temecula Valley Tourism FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. -- Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau has recognized Doug Leiber, general manager of Temecula Creek Inn, for his unmatched leadership and efforts in taking tourism in the Temecula Valley to the next level. At the bureau's annual meeting at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, Leiber was given the Miiyu Yam Award, named in honor of the Pechanga Resort & Casino and the pechanga Development Corporation for their support in helping to foster tourism development. Miiyu Yam means IIWelcome Alllt in the Luiseno language. llWe honor Doug Leiber for all his outstanding contributions to the tourism industry in the Temecula Valley and to our community," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. In particular, Leiber was recognized for his commitment and support of the Tourism Improvement District, which has allowed the bureau to be the first in Inland Southern California to use a marketing assessment fee rather than taxpayer money to market the region. Temecula City Council in February approved the district for a second year. liAs a leader representing Temecula hotels, he attending countless meetings with attorneys, city officials and city staff, speaking with passion about this community and our vision as a board and bureau, n Adams said. Leiber also played an important role in helping to develop a strategic marketing plan that will serve as the blueprint for the bureau1s efforts to brand and market the Temecula Valley as a rich and diverse tourist destination. Earlier this year, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau approved the marketing plan, which is projected to boost revenue at area hotels and motels by $4.7 million over the next five years. Leiber, a Temecula resident and 20-year veteran of the hospitality business, was first 1 chairman of the bureau. He currently is vice chairman. Active in the community, he also is a member of the Murrieta Temecula Group and is a past board member of the San Diego North Convention & Visitors Bureau and the American Institute of Food & Wine. 2 NEWS RELEASE May 22, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (888) 363-2852 www.temeculacvb.com Tourism a $538 Million Business in the Temecula Valley FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. - Tourism in 2006 pumped more than a half a billion dollars into the Temecula Valley economy and is responsible for more than 6,000 jobs in the region, according to a benchmark economic study completed by the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and City of Temecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four- fold increase from $131.2 million six years earlier. The 36-page report attributed the dramatic growth in large part to the soaring popularity of Temecula's Wine Country and to expansions at Pechanga Resort & Casino. "This report clearly shows that tourism and recreation playa much more vital role in Temecula's regional economy than previously thought," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. "That's why it is so important that we continue to get the message out about Wine Country, Pechanga and the many special events in our area to the estimated 25 million people who live in Southern California and the thousands of business travelers who flock to the region each year." Other study highlights: . One out of nine employees in Temecula work in hospitality and leisure services. . Temecula captured $1 of every $10 spent by visitors in Riverside County in 2005. . The Temecula Valley attracted nearly 2.2 million visitors in 2006. . Each visitor spent about $245 a day ($332 per party) while in Temecula. . Tourism supports an estimated 6,520 jobs in Temecula. . Travel spending resulted in $168.3 million in income to Temecula businesses and workers. . Tourism-related spending created $5.2 million in local taxes and $15.9 million in state taxes. . Hotel room sales reached about $40 million in 2006. . Temecula now accounts for 4 percent of Riverside County's transient occupancy tax (TOT) receipts, double what it was in the mid-1990s. The robust growth of TOT revenue, even in the face of a post-September 2001 travel slump, showed that tourism is exceptionally strong in the Temecula Valley. "No local industry could show the same level of revenue and employment growth from 2000 to 2006," said Dean Runyan, president and founder of Dean Runyan Associates. "It's even accelerated over the last couple of years." The key to continued growth will be how well the region nurtures Wine Country- one of its biggest assets, he said. "People can go elsewhere for casinos but they can not go someplace else for this wine experience," he said. Earlier this year the bureau approved a marketing plan that is projected to boost revenue at area hotels and motels by at least $4.7 million over the next five years. The projection was part of an 84-page report put together by Strategic Marketing Group of South Lake Tahoe that will serve as the blueprint for the bureau's efforts to brand and market the Temecula Valley. The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a premiere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. NEWS RELEASE July 2, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (888) 363-2852 www.temeculacvb.com Temecula a Featured Destination for Japanese Tourists FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. - The Temecula Valley can expect to see increased numbers of Japanese tourists this year thanks to a 1-year-old partnership between Disneyland Resorts and the Temecula Valley Visitor & Convention Bureau. Starting this month Temecula will once again host dozens of writers, camera crews and travel agencies from Japan that will highlight unique attractions in T emecula for the millions of Japanese travelers who come to the United States each year. The "fam" or familiarization tours are the direct result of the 5-year partnership with Disney known as the Southern California Experience that features oftsite destinations to Japanese visitors. "In the past year T emecula has been featured in numerous Japanese publications, TV travel shows, guide books and rental car company maps," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. "This valuable program is just another way the bureau is getting the word out about all the things you can do in the Temecula Valley." Interest among Japanese visitors has been particularly strong for Wine Country, hot air ballooning and a glimpse of the American West in Temecula's Old Town. "Many Japanese have never visited a winery," said Tomoko Sawada, senior promotions and public relations manager for Tokyo-based Disney Destination International, which arranges the fam tours. "The Japanese traveler is always looking for something new to do while in the United States." She estimated that Temecula and several other Southern California destinations have received media coverage valued at more than $70 million since the promotion began last year. In addition, Japanese travel companies have developed special Disney packages tours that include trips to other Southern California destinations such as Catalina Island, Newport Beach and San Diego. Many tourist destinations in the Valley have taken steps to accommodate the growing number of Japanese tourists. For example, Pechanga Resort & Casino and Magical Adventures hot air balloon company now have interpreters available for Japanese visitors. Tourism is an important and significant part of the Temecula Valley economy, according to a recent study completed by the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and City of Temecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four- fold increase from $131.2 million six years earlier. The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a premiere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. NEWS RELEASE July 13, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (888) 363-2852 www.temeculacvb.com Mercado Joins Temecula Valley CVB as Sales Manager FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. - Leslie Mercado, a 20-year veteran of the travel and hospitality business, has joined the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau as sales manager. Her primary focus will be to attract midweek corporate and group events to the region's hotels, attend trade shows and market the Temecula Valley as a rich and diverse tourist destination to the estimated 25 million people who live in Southern California and the thousands of business travelers who flock to the region each year. Most recently the Murrieta resident was sales manger at Pala Mesa Resort in Fallbrook. Over the years, Mercado has held management positions at some of the best-known properties in the travel industry, including the Historic Mission Inn in Riverside, Pala Casino Resort & Spa, JC Resorts (Temecula Creek Inn) and Marriott Suites. "We are fortunate to have someone with Leslie's energy and expertise in our bureau," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. "Her diverse and varied experience will help us drive Sunday to Thursday traffic to area hotels and destinations." The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a premiere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. NEWS RELEASE Sept. 11, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau www.temeculacvb.com CVB Rolls Out the Red Carpet for Festival Goers FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. - The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau is trying to make it easier for filmmakers and fans attending the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival to spend a little more time here. The bureau for the first time is hosting a hospitality suite, visits to wine country and tours scouting out potential film locations in the Temecula Valley. ''Thousands of people from all over the world are already coming to this 5-day event," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau. ''We just want to make sure all the producers, directors and visitors to the festival have an opportunity to find out about all the neat things there are to do in our community." The 5,000-square-foot Hospitality Suite in Tower Plaza across from Starbucks will serve as a hotel lobby of sorts by offering concierge services to festivalgoers looking for places to see and things to do on Thursday and Friday, two days of the festival that have no screenings. For example, the bureau on Friday will conduct a tour of three of the more than 30 wineries in Temecula's Wine Country. The bureau and the Inland Empire Film Commission also will host more than 120 filmmakers interested in learning more about potential film locations in the picturesque and historically diverse Temecula Valley. The festival includes several features with local connections. "April Moon" is a romantic comedy directed by Murrieta resident David Asmussen, and "Journey to Palomar" is a documentary about the man who built the observatory that sits in the mountains surrounding Temecula. They are among the more than 160 films being shown Wednesday through Sunday at the 13th annual Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival, which will be held at The Movi~ 10 at Tower Plaza Theatres. The festival begins at 5 p.m. today __ with a parade and a red-carpet celebration. For more information go to: www.tvifff.com Tourism is a significant part of the Temecula Valley economy, according to a recent study completed by the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and City of Temecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four- fold increase from $131.2 million six years earlier. The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed three years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a premiere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. Editor's note: Media interested in accompanying the film location or winery tours should contact Kimberly Adams at the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau at (951) 491-6085. NEWS RELEASE October 24, 2007 For more information contact: Kimberly Adams, Executive Director Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (888) 363-2852 www.temeculacvb.com Temecula Hospitality Industry Reaches Out to Fire Victims FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Temecula, Calif. - The hospitality and lodging industry of the Temecula Valley is reaching out with both hands to help those displaced by the devastating wildfires of Southern California. Assistance ranges from food and makeshift lodging in meeting and convention space, travel services for those seeking airline flights and out of the area rooms to free water, toothpaste, toothbrushes and deodorant for those caught up in this regional disaster that has affected hundreds of thousands of people. "Given the magnitude of this event, it's obviously not business as usual for hotels and motels of the Temecula Valley," said Kimberly Adams, executive director of the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau. "It's been gratifying to see how our members have stepped up and extended a helping hand to those forced from their homes." Temecula Valley Tourist Center in Old Town has helped evacuees find airline flights and when possible rooms in the Temecula area. When local rooms have not been available, workers at the center have helped wildfire victims to find lodging in neighboring communities such as Lake Elsinore and Corona. Hotels with convention space have converted ballrooms into temporary lodging quarters by adding cots when all their regular rooms filled up. Pechanga Resort & Casino is housing and feeding many of these evacuees from San Diego as well as other tribes affected by he wildfires. Embassy Suites in Temecula set up cots and mattresses in its ballroom to accommodate overflow traffic from its rooms. "Some of our employees live in Rainbow and Fallbrook," said Donn Hooker, Embassy Suites general manager. "They know of more than one family in our ballroom who lost a home." Hooker said the hotel is bending the rules a bit as it permits pets and provides free coffee, soda and water to guests/neighbors/evacuees in the hotel's lounge. The cots in the ballroom are also available to overworked police and fire personnel for a quick nap. Anyone in a uniform gets free breakfast, he added. He complimented the hotels more than 80 employees who have been arriving early and staying late to help out with the more than 300 guests at the hotel. The Temecula Valley Visitors & Convention Bureau, formed two years ago, is a non-profit organization whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and tourism by promoting the Temecula Valley as a premiere destination to meeting planners, tour operators and leisure travelers. The bureau is the first in Inland Southern California to use marketing assessment fees rather than taxpayer money to market the region. American visitors are discovering Temecula for the first time for many of the same reasons that Japanese tourists are flocking to the region. In the past year Temecula has been featured in numerous Japanese publications, TV travel shows, guide books and rental car company maps. Interest among Japanese visitors is particularly strong for Wine Country, hot air ballooning and a glimpse of the American West in Temecula's Old Town. "Many Japanese have never visited a winery," said Tomoko Sawada, senior promotions and public relations manager for Tokyo-based Disney Destination International, which arranges Temecula- oriented fam tours. "The Japanese traveler is always looking for something new to do while in the United States." The numbers don't lie. Tourism in 2006 pumped more than a half a billion dollars into the Temecula Valley economy and is responsible for more than 6,000 jobs in the region, according to a benchmark economic study completed by the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau and City of Temecula. The study, conducted by Dean Runyan Associates of Portland, estimated that visitor spending in the Temecula Valley in 2006 reached $537.7 million, a four-fold increase from $131.2 million six years earlier. The 36-page report attributed the dramatic growth in large part to the soaring popularity of Temecula's Wine Country and to expansions at Pechanga Resort & Casino. The key to continued growth will be how well the region nurtures Wine Country - one of its biggest assets, he said. "People can go elsewhere for casinos but they can not go someplace else for this wine experience," said Dean Runyan, president and founder of Dean Runyan Associates. No longer a dusty crossroads on the road from L.A to San Diego, Temecula is emerging as a world class destination. The area is home to award-winning wineries and restaurants, European spas, championship golf, Vegas-like entertainment, a premier equestrian facility, hot air ballooning, an antique shoppers paradise, vestiges of the Old West and countless festivals and special events, including the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival, Car Shows and Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival . There is fishing, boating and camping at nearby Lake Skinner and Lake Elsinore. Just northwest of Temecula is the pristine Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve. Along with wine, golf and gaming, Temecula is the site of one the nation's premiere equestrian facilities. Galway Downs, which covers 240 acres in the southern part of the Temecula, hosts several world class horse events each year New ownership is making plans to build an equestrian resort at Galway Downs. Gas remains expensive. Southern Californians can avoid the hassle and cost of driving elsewhere by planning their vacations and getaways in Temecula. Located just about an hour from anywhere in Southern California, Temecula is the convenient and energy efficient alternative to faraway places such as Napa and Las Vegas. Spend a day or spend a week. Temecula has great golf, dozens of wineries, spa treatments, sunny weather and super casino entertainment. In another sign that Temecula has truly arrived as a quality winemaking region, it's wineries consistently walk away with gold medals from prestigious wine competitions. It's wines also are catching the eye and palates of wine critics, who have assigned 90 plus ratings to a growing number of local wines. In the dessert wine category in particular, Temecula fares well in contests because of its unique climate. "In Temecula we have an opportunity to leave the grapes on the vine longer than other colder wine-making regions/" explains Marshall Stuart/ owner of Stuart Cellars. nThis area has a better climate for late harvest wines." Vintners and growers attribute their success to healthy competition among local wineries and cooperative educational efforts. If Temecula's more than 30 wineries attract wine lovers from allover the globe, then the regions world-class restaurants and award-winning chefs keep them here. In the last year alone, dozens of sit-down restaurants have opened their doors in the Temecyula Valley/ which now boasts more than 300 dining spots. In Wine Country alone there are nearly a dozen eateries dotting the vineyards and more on the way. Pechanga Resort & Casino hosts a handful of top end restaurants. Lured by competitive salaries, new restaurants and great quality of life, chefs from across the globe are bringing their own special brand of culinary magic to tables throughout the region. Temecula Valley TIn-200S 2008-2009 TID Budget 2007-2008 Carry Over 2008-2009 B t 2008-2009 Media Plan / 2008-2009 Trade Show Schedule Sales Taskforce Goals 2008-2009 Marketing Plan t\\/Kn:tv GtW022 SECTION 1 TEMECULA VALLEY "--- Convention and Visitors Bureau TID Annual Budget 2008-2009 Advertising- Marketing Dues & Subscriptions 373,900 10,200 15,000 3,600 Advertising-Website Advertising- Media FAM Tours/Site Tours 4,800 Office Supplies Personnel Costs 2,800 64,000 6,000 37,800 10,500 26,400 16,000 13,000 Printing Professional Fees Promotional Items Rent Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment Total 584.000 TEMECULA VALLEY ---- Convention and Visitors Bureau 2008-2009 TIC Budget Highlights Advertlslna-Marketina. Web. Media Media Plan attached $399.100 Dues & SubscriDtions Meeting Planners International National Tour Operators California Society of Association Executives MPI NTA CalSAE Hospitality Sales & Marketing Assn. International HSMAI WACVB $3.600.00 Western Association of Convention & Visitor Bureaus Personnel Sales Manager, including benefits $64.000.00 Printina Direct mail, show materials, etc. $6.000.00 Professional Fees Legal, Accounting Fees, Hotel Star report $37.800.00 Promotional Items Event & show marketing giveaways $10.500.00 Rent Office space and operating costs Trade Show ParticiDation CalTIA - Conference on Tourism MPI Southern California Chapter Trade Show Successful Meetings - California Meetings MP Sacramento, CA March 2008 Los Angeles, CA March 20, 2008 Monterey, CA April 14,16, 2008 $26.400.00 16.000.00 $1,600.00 $ 800.00 $3,500.00 $3,100.00 ($3,600,00*) $3,000.00 $1,500.00 $2,500.00 HSMAI Affordable Meetings West MPI World Education Conference & Trade Show Incentive Travel & Meeting Executives CalSAE Seasonal Spectacular MPI Professional Education ConffTrade Show Long Beach, CA June 11-12, 2008 Las Vegas, NV August 9-12, 2008 Chicago, IL September 23-28, 2008 Sacramento, CA December 3, 2008 TBD Additional Shows Paid bv General Fund NBC San Diego Travel and Leisure Expo Wedding Trade Show SO Food & Wine Show LA Times Travel Show Bay Area Travel Show San Diego, CA Temecula, CA San Diego, CA Long Beach, CA Santa Clara, CA September 29 -30, 2008 February, June, September 2008 November 2008 February 2008 January 2009 N/C NC N/C NC Travel & Entertainment Hotel, Airline, Booth Shipping $13,000.00 *Not included in Budget will add If TID resourse increase --J-~mecula. Valley Convention & Visitor's Bureau 2008-09 Budaet Per Month TID Fund TOTAL f- MarOe Apr08 May 08 JunOe Jul08 ., 08 Sept 08 Oet08 NovOe Dee 08 Jan09 Feb09 Mar '08. Feb 09 Income --- -+~~ 52,000 47,000 50,000 58,000 54,000 52,000 49,000 45,000 43,000 42,000 42,000 44,000 578,000 Investment Revenue 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 Total Income . 52,500 47,500 50,500 58,500 54,500 52,500 49,500 45,500 43,500 42,500 42,500 44,500 584,000 I Ex anse Advertisin ~Printed Marketi 20,750 28,850 37,350 39,550 39,550 38,550 31,550 30,550 28,350 26,050 25,750 27,050 373,900 Advertisin -Website 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 10,200 Advertisin -Media 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 15,000 Dues & Subscriptions 1,200 1,200 1,200 3,600 FAM TourslSite Visits 200 200 200 200 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 4,800 Office Supplies 2,800 2,800 Personnel Costs 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 64,000 Printin 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 Professional Fees 14,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 37,800 Promotional Items 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,500 Rent 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 26,400 Trade Show Participation 1,600 3,500 3,100 3,000 1,500 800 2,500 16,000 Travel & Entertainment 1,500 1,500 500 1,500 500 500 1,500 500 500 1,500 1,500 1,500 13,000 Total Expense 52,500 47,500 50,500 58,500 54,500 52,500 49,500 45,500 43,500 42,500 42,500 44,500 584,000 Net Income - - SECTION 2 Income Funding Investment Revenue Total Income Expense Advertising/Marketing Operational Total Expense Net Income 2007-2008 Carryover Projected: November December January February 43,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 NOV-FEB 169,000 YTD 63,902 Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors' Bureau Budget to Actual Report For The Ten Month Period Ending December 31, 2007 TID Fund Actual Thru 12/31/07 502,812 502,812 308,890 130,020 438,910 63,902 Total Carryover prjected:$232,902 See Accompanying Accountants' Report Annual Budget 532,000 6,000 538,000 408,600 129.400 538,000 ~ $ Over/(Under) Budget (29,188) (6,000) (35,188) (99,710) 620 (99,090) 63,902 "~'I Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Tourism Improvement District (TID) 2006/07 Expenses, Budget and Carryover Funds Income Funding Total Income Expense Advertising-Printed Marketing Advertising-Website Advertising - Media Bank Fees Dues & Subscriptions Event Hosting, Industry Sales Event Hosting, Local Community FAM Tours/Site Visits Office Supplies Personnel Costs Postage Printing Professional Fees Promotional Items Rent Repairs & Improvements Telecommunications Trade Show Participation Travel & Entertainment Lodging Unbudgeted Total Expense TID Actual expenses Original Budget Mar '06 . Feb '07 Revised Per Actual Revenue I 535,69B I 535,698 TID 535,6981 535,698 184,850 224,445 7,540 119 17,000 10,578 - 106 1,200 2,025 . 816 - 62 4.200 12 2.800 733 39,240 29,776 - 262 1,800 108 36,200 33,496 8,000 B,048 14,400 15,380 - 2,128 - 1,120 10,000 14,777 11,600 1,589 - 129 196,868 - 535,698 345,708 TID Carryover Balance TID Actual Expenses Mar '07 - Dec '07 TID Remaining Carryover Balance (39,595) 188,363 (227,958) 7,421 - 7,421 . 6,422 776 5,646 (106) - (106) (825) - (825) (816) - (816) (62) - (62) 4,188 - 4,188 2,067 - 2,067 9,465 - 9,465 (262) - (262) 1,692 - 1,692 2,704 - 2.704 (48) 851 (899) (980) - (980) (2,128) - (2,128) (1,120) - (1,120) (4,777) - (4,777) 10,011 . 10,011 (129) (129) 196,868 - 196.868 189,990 189,990 (0) SECTION 3 ~!!leCUla Valley Convention & YisitC!rs' Bureau 2008-09 Budget All Funds Combined TOTAL I Mar 08 Apr08 Ma 08 Jun08 Jul08 Au 08 Se 08 Oet08 Nov 08 Dec 08 Jan 09 Feb 09 Mar '08 - Feb 09 - Income f- .- Advertisinn - Website 1,300 1,300 1,300 .1,~SlO 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 15,600 F~ndin!:f 77,000 72,000 75,000 83,000 199,000 77,000 74,000 70,000 68,000 67,000 67,000 69,000 998,000 Investment Revenue 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 Membershin Dues 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 Merchandise Sales 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 Sales-Publications 20,000 20,000 Total Income 80,800 75,800 78,800 86,800 202,800 80,800 77,800 73,800 71,800 70,800 70,800 92,800 1,063,600 Expense , Advertisino-Printed Marketing 32,060 34,502 48,890 45,540 152,940 41,192 34,189 38,789 38,938 36,238 35,938 57,638 596,854 I Advertisina-Website 885 885 885 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 1,735 18,270 I Advertisino - Media 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 6,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 20,000 I Dues & Subscrintions 1,240 40 40 1,240 40 40 40 490 1,240 40 40 40 4,530 Event Hostina, Industry Sales 200 1,500 1,500 3,200 Event Hostina, Local Community 500 1,000 100 500 100 100 100 500 100 500 500 100 4,100 FAM TourslSite Visits 200 200 200 200 3,500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 7,800 Insurance 42 3,200 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 3,368 Office SUDDlies 2,850 2,050 50 2,050 50 8,000 8,000 50 50 50 50 50 23,300 Personnel Costs 18,265 19,265 18,265 18,265 19,265 18,263 18,265 19,265 18,265 18,265 19,265 18,265 223,178 I Printinn 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 ! Professional Fees 14,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 2,300 39,600 Promotional ttems 500 500 500 3,500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 13,000 Rent 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 4,400 52,800 Telecommunications 408 408 408 408 408 758 758 758 759 759 759 759 7,350 Trade Show Particioation 1,600 3,500 3,100 8,000 3,000 1,500 800 2,500 24,000 Travel & Entertainment 1,800 1,800 800 1,800 800 750 1,750 750 750 1,750 1,750 1,750 16,250 Total Expense 80,800 75,800 78,800 86,800 202,800 80,800 77,800 73,800 71,800 70,800 70,800 92,800 1,063,600 Net Income - - - - - - - - Temecula Valley Convb!'lntin & Visitors' Bureau -- 200a-09 Bud~ General Fund TOTAl -----~--" MarOa AprOa May oa JunOa JulOa Au OB Se OB Oetoa NovOa Decoa Jan 09 Feb 09 Mar 'oa - Feb 09 +'ncome ......L. rAdvertising - Website 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 15,600 ! ..........-Fun~!!!9 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 300,000 MembershiD Dues 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 Merchandise Sales 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 12,000 Sales-Publications 20,000 20,000 Total Income 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 48,300 359,600 Exnense Advertisin .Printed Marketin 11,310 5,652 11,540 5,990 9,390 2,642 2,639 8,239 10,588 10,188 10,188 30,588 118,954 Advertisina-Website 35 35 35 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 BB5 8,070 Dues & SUbscriptions 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 490 40 40 40 40 930 Event Hostin , Indust Sales 200 1,500 1,500 3,200 : i Event Hostina, Local Community 500 1,000 100 500 100 100 100 500 100 500 500 100 4,100 , Insurance 42 3,200 12 12 12 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 3,368 Office Supplies 50 2,050 50 2,050 50 8,000 8,000 50 50 50 50 50 20,500 Personnel Costs 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,263 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,265 13,265 159,178 Professional Fees 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1,800 Promotional Items 2,500 2,500 Rent 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 26,400 Telecommunications 40B 40B 40B 40B 40B 75B 75B 75B 759 759 759 759 7,350 Travel & Entertainment 300 300 300 300 300 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 3,250 Total Expense 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 28,300 48,300 359,600 Net Income -- -- - - -- - -- TemeculB: Valley Convention & Vj~itor's Bureau I I 200a-09 Budget Per Month TID Fund TOTAL --r-r- Mar OS A rOS May OS JunOS JulOS Au 08 Sept OS OetOS NovOa DecOa Jan09 Feb09 Mar 'OS. Feb 09 Income - -+~unding 52,000 47,000 50,000 58,000 54,000 52,000 49,000 45,000 43,000 42,000 42,000 44,000 578,000 . Investment Revenue 5C)0 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 Total Income 52,500 47,500 50,500 58,500 54,500 52,500 49,500 45,500 43,500 42,500 42,500 44,500 584,000 Ex ense I Advertising-Printed Marketl 20,750 28,850 37,350 39,550 39,550 38,550 31,550 30,550 28,350 26,050 25,750 27,050 373,900 Advertising-Website 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 850 10,200 Advertisin -Media 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 1,250 15,000 Dues & Subscri ions 1,200 1,200 1,200 3,600 FAM TourslSite Visits 200 200 200 200 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 4,800 Office Supplies 2,800 2,800 Personnel Costs 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 64,000 Printin 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 6,000 Professional Fees 14,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 2,150 37,800 Promotionalltems 500 500 500 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 10,500 Rent 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 2,200 26,400 Trade Show Partici ation 1,600 3,500 3,100 3,000 1,500 800 2,500 16,000 Travel & Entertainment 1,500 1,500 500 1,500 500 -500 1,500 500 500 1,500 1,500 1,500 13,000 Total Expense 52,500 47,500 50,500 58,500 54,500 52,500 49,500 45,500 43,500 42,500 42,500 44,500 584,000 Net Income - , - - - - - Temecula Valley C!'.nvention & Visitors' Bureau 2008-09 Budget ._. City Marketing Fund TOTAL ==i Inc10me Mar 08 Apr08 May 08 Jun 08 Jul08 Aua 08 Sea 08 Oct 08 Nov 08 Dec 08 Jan 09 Feb 09 Mar '08 - Feb 09 -T'lFunding , - , - 120,000 - - - - - - - 120,000 Total Income - - - - 120,000 , - - - - 120,000 Expense Advertising-Printed Marketing - - - - 104,000 - - - - - - - 104,000 Advertising - Media - - - - 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 FAM Tours/Site Visits - - - - 3,000 - - - - - - - 3,000 Trade Show Participation - , - - 8,000 - - - - - - - 8,000 Total Expense - - - - 120,000 - - - - - - - 120,000 Net Income - - - - - - - - - - - - - SECTION 4 Temecula Valley 2008-2009 PublicationIWebsitelEventsITrade Show Media Plan Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept T Oct I Nov I Dee I Publlcatlon/Webslte/EvenUTrade show 1IIITl I I II I I I I I I I Leisure I I II IICM8l '. .......... Coast Magazme .~..~ iifi Los Angeles Magazine T ,. ".. Inland Empire Magazine ........ Inland Empire Metro '., Palm Springs Ufe ..... ~' .. ii'i ",iX Sunset 'i..... ",.' ..,.,.... BudgetTravel 1l'{,:~[~r{i\'1 I California Drives I CA Official Visitors Guide I I I I I IIIII*lt .. Southwest Airlines Spirit -- I I Sunset Wine Club I I I I I Gol! Print. TBD ~............ West Ways ~s".,,,,;X.. Anaheim/Orange County ViSi10r Guide , i." Sprats Travel Travel Host I I I I NeWSDaDerS I I I I IIoc iF' DC Register - ~ .. .:i,.,i..' LA Times lif I I I II I IITT I I MeetinQs I I 1 I I I 1/me8t.. T:J' "'.;...... Smart Meetings "'i~ I I j. 1ImIIt. ", ".......' Meetings West I yi......." Meeling News T "~1'jtJi?i!3lI I/me8t I I tllnlllt .: ASSOCiation News "> I/me8t ',; ." HSMAI SD Norttl Meeling Planners ITT I I Online 1i!"1"1'!;~1 - Southwest Featured Destination' Golfonllne ,. TT TIIII USA Today I I I I I I I Meetings Online Ads. TBD r TT TI III CTTC "".. T SiQnature Event MarketinQ I I IIOdn.rl . .. ..... Spring Rod Run ." ;C ..,..if",'," XTERRA.Sports Balloon & Wine Festival I{{:~'~m:~' International Jazz Feslival ~ . IIIlIm ',""{ Internation Film & MUSIC Festival IhodIUn " ;-z ,',H" Fall Rod Run Trade Show MarketinQ I T Leisure {;Ilff! ~ Meelings Market I I I I - Food & Wine -- I I I -r ' .-, Media I I II I I I Outdoor - Fashion Valley ....i,. I I I I I I I I Highway Billboard 10.215 Freeway -. 'Plan sub)est to changes based on TIO revenues/cash flow - - - - - - - - -- - - - 1/812008 - - SECTION 5 Fiscal 2008-2009 TID Trade Shows CalTIA - Conference on Tourism MPI Southern California Chapter Trade Show Successful Meetings - California Meetings Market Place HSMAI Affordable Meetings West MPI W orId Education Conference & Trade Show Incentive Travel & Meeting Executives NBC San Diego Travel and Leisure Expo San Diego Bay Wine & Food Festival CalSAE Seasonal Spectacular Bay Area Travel Show LA Times Travel Show MPI Professional Education Conference & Trade Show TOTAL RESTRICTED TRADE SHOW FUNDS Sacramento, CA Los Angeles, CA Monterey, CA Long Beach, CA Las Vegas, NV Chicago, IL San Diego, CA San Diego, CA Sacramento, CA Santa Clara, CA Long Beach, CA TBA March 2008 March 20, 2008 April 14-16, 2008 June 11-12,2008 August 9-12,2008 September 23-28, 2008 September 2008 November 2008 December 3,2008 January 2009 February 2009 February 2009 *Not included in total, however, if budget and TID growth permits, trade show will be attended **Unrestricted Funds $1,600.00 $ 800.00 $3,500.00 $3,100.00 ($3,600.00*) $3,000.00 $** $** $1,500.00 $** $** $2500.00 $16,000.00 Temecula Valley eVB 2008/2009 Tradeshow Calendar Show Show Description CalTIA Conference on Tourism MPI SCC California Marketplace Meetings Marketplace HSMAI Affordable Meetings West MPI World Education Conference NBC San Diego Travel Expo Incentive Travel & Meeting Executives (IT&ME) Show San Diego Bay Wine & Food Festival California Society of Association Executives (CaISAE) Seasonal Bay Area Travel Show LA Times Travelshow MPI PEC Date Location Target Markets March 2008 Sacramento, CA All March 20, 2008 Los Angeles CA All April 14-16, 2008 Monterey, CA All June 11-12, 2008 long Beach CA All August 9-12, 2008 Las Vegas, NV All September 2008 San Diego CA Leisure September 23-28, 2008 Chicago IL Corp & Incentive November 2008 San Diego CA Leisure December 3, 2008 Sacramento, CA Assn January 2009 Santa Clara CA leisure February 2009 Long Beach CA Leisure February 2009 TSA All Outstanding marketing opportunity to promote to 500 of the State's most qualified travel and tourism professionals. www.caltia.com Sponsored by MPI Southern California Section, the trade show draws close to 800 planners from all over southern California as well as NV & AZ Sponsored by Successful Meetings Magazine, this event provides a forum to build relationships and networking opportunities for attendees by combining an educational session, social activities, and one-on-one appointments. Attendees are invitation only and are pre-qualified planners who are considering California for their meeting destination and have groups yielding a minimum of 50 room nights. Sponsored by Hospitality Sales & Marketing Assn Int'l, This show attracts a diverse group of meeting professionals from organizations of every type and size looking to learn, establish connections and do business. Attendees are searching for moderate to upscale accornodations and venues. Formore information visit www.affordablemeetings.com Sponsored by MPllnternational, the World Education Conference draws Meeting Planners and Suppliers from around the world for educational sessions and Annual Trade Show event. The NBC San Diego Travel Expo is presented by NBC Channel 7/39 and Mi San Diego TV 43 (Spanish Station.) This Expo is free to the public and is expected to draw over 20,000 attendees over the 2-day period. The IT&ME Show attracts over 13,000 buyers of Incentive Travel, 30% of which have annual travel budgets of $100,000-$1 Million and 24% with an annual budget of over $1 Million. The San Diego Bay Wine & Food Festival (held November 14-18) is an international showcase of the world's premier wine and spirits producers, chefs and culinary personalities. Produced by World of Wine Events, the festival benefits the American Institute of Wine & Food culinary arts scholarship. CalSAE is home to the 3rd largest association community in the nation with over 1,100 members. The Seasonal Spectacular is the premiere association networking tradeshow in California and the largest on the West Coast. For more information, visit www.calsae.org The premier travel event for Northern California, the Bay Area Travel Show attracts over 7,000 travel-motivated consumers from the affluent San Francisco Bay Area, and 300 Travel Agents The LA Times Travel Show is the biggest travel weekend ofthe year with more than 12,000-13,000 upscale, travelminded people who attend. For more information, visit www.latimes.com/extras/travelshow/exhibitors_info.html This show, which draws thousands of meeting professionals from all over the western states offers a unique opportunity to meet one on one with planners, via a match-making tool which allows exhibitors to create a wish list for ideal prospects. The show also offers many networking opportunities during educational sessions. SECTION 6 Sales Task Force 2008 Goals . Quarterly Sales Blitzes ~ Focus on one region per quarter to include San Diego, Orange County, Los Angeles and the Inland Empire ~ Invite TID Hotel Partners and Visitor Center Staffto attend ~ Create a list of potential "calls" based on past and current sales clients ~ Provide client's office with lunch as an added incentive to meet with sales blitz team ~ Conduct Blitz Pre Con to review game plan, focus and goals of sales blitz ~ Focus to be predominately on midweek group business, offering special incentives and "hot dates" to planners who book Sunday-Thursday business . Quarterly Sales Meeting ~ Roundtable session with all TID Hotel Partners ~ Forum to discuss sales strategies and ideas ~ "Hot Button" issues and concerns ~ Review occupancy trends · Quarterly Email Newsletter ~ Newsletter to be sent to all planners in current database ~ Meeting Planner focused topics ~ Spotlight TID Hotels, area events, and tourism related news ~ Use Newsletter as a means to continually familiarize meeting planners with the Temecula Valley and its assets · Meeting Planner Focus ~ Redesign Meeting Planner Guide to create a more detailed and inclusive planning resource ~ Create a Meeting Planner Specific Sales Kit to include the redesign Meeting Planner Guide, TID Hotel Brochure, and Quick Reference Guide ~ Create online RFP Form on TVCVB Website Temecula CVB Action Plan Implementation Results Sales Brand Development Corporate & Incentive Complete 1 Complete 0 0% In progress 6 In progress 6 86% Not Started 1 Not Started 1 14% Total 8 Total 7 100% SMERF Visitor Data Collection Complete 0 Complete S 26% In progress 4 In progress 9 47% Not Started 0 Not Started S 26% Total 4 Total 19 100% Association Website Enhancement Complete 1 Complete 0 0% In progress 3 In progress 25 96% Not Started 2 Not Started 1 4% Total 6 Total 26 100% Tour & Travel Media Planning Complete 0 Complete 4 25% In progress 1 In progress 9 56% Not Started 1 Not Started 3 19% Total 2 Total 16 100% Sales Action Plan Public Relations Tradeshows and Membership Complete 0 0% Complete 3 In progress 16 89% In progress 1 Not Started 2 11% Not Started 0 Total 18 100% Total 4 Direct Sales Visitor Information Complete 0 Complete 1 13% I n progress 3 In progress S 63% Not Started 0 Not Started 2 25% Total 3 Total 8 100% Client Relations & Account Retention Complete o Special Events/Promotions In progress B Complete 0 0% Not Started 0 In progress 5 83% Total 8 Not Started 1 17% Total 6 100% Temecula CVB Action Plan Implementation Results Research New Markets Complete o Strategic Partnership In progress 3 Complete 0 0% Not Started 0 In progress 4 100% Total 3 Not Started 0 0% Direct Mail Total 4 100% Complete o Research & Measurement In progress 1 Complete 0 0% Not Started 0 In progress 11 100% Total 1 Not Started 0 0% Industry Memberships Total 11 100% Complete 0 In progress 1 Not Started 0 Total 1 Promotions Complete 0 In progress 3 Not Started 0 Total 3 Sales Measurement Complete 0 In progress 5 Not Started 0 Total 5 Other Complete 0 In progress 7 Not Started 1 Total 8 ~"lii;t.~:<P:" _ . ~, '" " ., " " \., , , " ~, , " , , , . I~t t''' , , ~" , ,J!. " ~Xt~' ., ~ ,.,<< ,.,. '.llI!., ,. 0- " "Iii!, ,;',. " , ; , "~1fu1f !\:<;i.~ ;,1: . ~ , " ",<:i:. ..'1 E<!';c'. , .. , ," . , SECTION 7 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan SBction IX MarkBting Opportunity H T argBt MarkBts A. Temecula Valley Marketing Opportunity If the newly formed visitors bureau and the community can consistently increase room sales through the TVCVB's leadership and expanded marketing efforts, there can be significant revenue growth. Following are two scenarios based on 5 year projections that outline potential Return on Investment (ROI) by the TVCVB's efforts. Scenario 1: Moderate Growth Scenario . Minimal new inventory is added. . Average Daily Rate increases at 3% annually. . Occupancy increases at approximately 1.5% annually. Scenario 2: Aggressive Growth . Minimal new inventory is added. . Average Daily Rate increases at 3% annually. . Occupancy increases at about 3% annually, Scenario 1 5 Year Projection - !.fl"".~ . '&~~~~ 1.640 1,640 1,640 1,640 1,640 1,640 598.600 598,600 598,600 598,600 598,600 598,600 72% 73.5% 75.0% 76.5% 78.0% 79.5% 430,992 439,971 448.950 457,929 466,908 475,887 0 8,979 8,979 8,979 8,979 8,979 $100 $103.00 $106.09 $109.27 $112.55 $115.93 $924,837.00 $952,582.11 $981,159.57 $1,010.594.36 $1.040,912.19 $430,992 $439,971 $448,950 $457,929 $466.908 $2,1 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2 , I 1 Hotel Rooms Rooms Available Occupancy Rooms Sold Incremental Rooms ADR Incremental Revenue Incremental Cost ROI Scenario 2 5 Year Projection _~~F.}..I!.iil<''''m\!WIl'l;\'w..il'.~.: ,"~<(I#lllliii'jji',f<ll!'"",,*~~'\'!i1\'.JJ;'~l:!~_.' ''l1ll1''.''I-!j105!ii~jl,!jf''~l!'~ ~~~J1~.~~~~J~{f~~1!~{'~~~~~W!.~~"~h'W~~~~ 1,640 1,640 1,640 1,640 1.640 1,640 598,600 598,600 598,600 598,600 598,600 598,600 72% 75.0% 78.0% 81.0% 84.0% 87.0% 430,992 448,950 466,908 484,866 502,824 520,782 o 17,958 17,958 17,958 17,958 17,958 $100 $103.00 $106.09 $109.27 $112.55 $115,93 $1,849,674.00 $1,905,164,22 $1,962,319,15 $2,021,188.72 $2,081,824.38 $430,992 $448,950 $466,908 $484,866 $502,824 $4.3 $4.2 $4.2 $4.2 $4.1 Hotel Rooms Rooms Available Occupancy Rooms Sold Incremental Rooms ADR Incremental Revenue Incremental Cost ROI Source, SMG It should be noted that in either scenario it will be important for the destination to increase overall demand and focus TCVCB efforts to that end. Given Temecula Valley's new and exciting position in the marketplace, these scenarios may be understating the potential. On the other hand, acts of terrorism, economic uncertainty, increased competition as well as other issues may have a dramatic and negative impact on either scenario. ~ 52 Temecula Valley Convention and Visttors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B. Target Markets 1. Geographic Markets Based on its ciose proximity and large population base, Temecula Valley should focus on stimulating overnight visits from FIT, group and business travelers originating from Orange County. In addition to overnight leisure travelers from Orange County, it is believed that Temecula Valley also offers enough distance for business travelers and meeting and convention attendees to generate overnight stays. Based on information collected in the destination, the following target market summary for Orange County has been developed. Table 12 Target Market SIze and CharacterIstics Orange County 2004 Median Age 2004 Average Age Median Household Income Average Household Income Per capita income Casino Gambling Any casino gambling 34.6 35,3 $63,748 $83,329 $27,722 216,592 21.90%1 Activities on Domestic Vacation General sightseeing Attend event Shopping Play golf Bicycling Running/jogging Other outdoor sport/recreation Visit relatives/friends Visit spa 458,058 20.80% 179,461 8.20% 332,413 15.10% 65,299 3.00% 48,059 2.20% 35,262 1.60% 165,907 7.50% 330,289 15.00% 32,339 1.50% 231,220 24,2 238,864 25 268,483 28 237,908 24.9 184,403 19,3 227,398 23 Activities Participation in General Attend Arts & Cultural Events Gourmet Cooking/Fine Foods Bicycle frequently Golf Running/Jogging Wines Source: PCensus As illustrated in the above table, in addition to high household incomes, Orange County residents have a strong propensity to gamble, golf, enjoy wines, shop and attend arts and cultural events which include all the elements found in Temecula Valley. ~ 53 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan It should be noted that while the primary source of Temecula Valley's visitors arrive by automobile, there is significant air access into Ontario Airport with Southwest Airlines being the dominant carrier with approximately 50% of the passenger arrival market share. This offers excellent long-term potential for both group and FIT travel as Southwest provides access from a variety of California markets. Illustrated below, Southwest Airlines is the dominant carrier that services the Ontario Airport. Table 13 Ontario Airporl Carrier Market Share Airline Carrier Southwest Delta American West American Airlines United Alaska Continnental Skywest Northwest Horizon Air Other Source: Ontario Airport Market Share 49% 8.3% 7.3% 7.2% 5.8% 4.3% 3.8% 3.4% 2.5% 2.4% 5.2% In terms of access markets, there are 51 daily non-stop flights between Oakland, Sacramento and San Jose into Ontario Airport with approximately 6,987 seats. This frequency and capacity offers Temecula Valley significant long-term growth opportunities. Table 14 Southwest Non-Stop Flights From Selected Markets Market FlightslDay Oakland 19 Sacramento 19 San Jose 13 Source: Southwest Airlines ~ Est Seats 2,603 2,603 1,781 6,987 54 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 2. Target Segments With regards to target markets, the TVCVB should target leisure (FIT) and group travelers as indicated below. A FIT Travelers Based upon T emecula Valley's easily accessible location and wide range of activities, the following leisure segments should be targeted: . Baby Boomers (35-54) . Active Mature Adults (55+) o Vacation/Getaway It should be noted that these targeted age groups of leisure travelers are highly receptive to visiting destinations that are convenient "easy to get to" getaways which Temecula Valley epitomizes. B. Groups While the individual properties and attractions primarily target their efforts at leisure travelers, the TVCVB will optimize its marketing efforts and resources by focusing on group and business travelers that can generate business for the destination during the mid-week. Following is a list of potential groups that should be targeted by the TVCVB: . Corporate & Incentive - (30-40%) Sales and reward based meetings . SMERF - (30-40%) Sports, Military, Educational, Religious and Fraternal groups . Associations - (10-20%) State or National Associations ~ 55 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan S8ction X Mark8ting Strat8gi8s In order to achieve its stated goals and to establish an effective long-term competitive advantage, the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau must successfully implement three core strategies. These include destination branding, differentiating the destination, and facilitating the conversion of mid week room sales by the private sector. T emecula Valley Core Strategies A. Branding/Positioning 1. AIDA (Awareness, Interest, Desire and Action) Being a new destination, Temecula Valley must create awareness and desire among its identified target segments. The basic AIDA model of Awareness, Interest, Desire and Action is one that can conceptually guide the marketing and sales efforts of the organization. Awareness Create Awereness of Temecula Valley. Interest Develop Interest in Temecula Valley. Desire Create Desire to visit Temecula Valley. Action Instill Action to visit Temecula Valley. The TVCVB needs to see its efforts as impacting the market through each of the above steps. This process should be viewed as strategic in nature since it takes time to build a brand. It is critical to understand that brand building is essentail for both FIT and group travel. Both segments have to have awareness and a positive perception of the destination in order to take action to visit the area. ~ 56 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau 2. Brand Identity Strategic Marketing Plan A brand is the way in which visitors perceive or distinguish a destination. Temecula Valley's brand, "Where you want to be...", helps to promote one, all-inclusive identity that integrates all of the destination's primary attributes - wine, history, golf, gaming, events - to create an indelible impression in the mind of the consumer. A brand not only selVes to unify all of the assets/attributes of a destination under one identity. It also works to unify the community and encourage it to provide the highest quality standards and customer selVice that will further strengthen the brand and customer loyalty. 3. Brand Awareness and Customer Loyalty As time becomes increasingly scarce, consumers will first turn to highly visible brand names when planning a purchase. Consumers want an assurance of quality when they don't have the time, opportunity or ability to inspect alternatives. This positive behavior is reinforced by the constant visibility of a brand using mediums and communication efforts that reach the target segment. A brand representing leadership, success, quality and excitement can create a genuine connection with the consumer. Temecula Valley: "Where you want to be..." Wine. History. Golf. Gaming. Events Target Market Segments Brand Awareness: Educate Target Segments via TVCVB Communications Brand Recognition: Familiarity of the Temecula Valley brand leads to Recall & Preference These positive associations can motivate a buying decision that is both emotionally and functionally driven and is positively reinforced when the experience meets the expectation. As such, the Temecula Valley CVB, lodging properties, attractions and all visitor oriented businesses should strive to consistently offer exceptional customer selVice beginning with the information gathering process to the actual visitor experience. The continual and dedicated commitment by each community member, TVCVB and business to provide a positive overall experience will help to build brand awareness, reinforce positive brand associations, and generate customer (brand) loyalty among target segments. Above all, a highly loyal customer base can be expected to generate repeat visitations and revenue flow. To effectively communicate the key benefits of visiting the destination, the Temecula Valley brand needs to be continually promoted in all marketing initiatives. As such, it is critical that the key points of differentiation that help to build the Temecula Valley brand continue to be interwoven and communicated through all aspects of the TVCVB and the private sector marketing efforts over the long-term. With only a limited budget (even with the added BID funds), the TVCVB can increase the visibility of its brand through the following marketing and promotional initiatives: (, , o TVCVB website and collateral materials, o Logo exposure on all partner (private sector) promotional pieces, i.e., website, signage, brochures, etc. o Strategic partnerships with public and private sector inside and outside ofTemecula Valley. o Public relations efforts that are targeted at key market segments and media. o Sales activities that represent the destination. ~ 57 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 4. Brand Extension SMG sees the opportunity to extend the existing Temecula Valley brand to a variety of market segments. Core Brand: "Where you want to be... Temecula Valley." Brand Extensions by Segment: Golf Meetings leisure T emecula Valley. "The place you want to golf." Temecula Valley. "The place you want to meet." Temecula Valley. 'The place you want to play." ~ 58 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B. Differentiate the Destination Part of successfully building the Temecula Valley brand and destination awareness is to clearly differentiate the experience in the mind of consumers and key group leaders. As such, Temecula Valley should differentiate its offerings from the competition through an emphasis of its key tourism assets, translating them into believable and meaningful benefits for its new and repeat target market segments. Key Points of Differentiation Tourism Asset: Consumer Benefit: New Southern California Destination New Experience As a burgeoning new destination tucked away in southwest California, T emecula Valley has the perfect blend of rural charm and metropolitan excitement unlike any other location in Southern California. This unique "boutique destination" offers award-winning wineries, diverse accommodations and group facilities, cultural events, 24-hour gaming and entertainment, and championship golf to suit a wide variety of preferences and budgets for leisure and business travelers. Weather Comfortable Environment Temecula Valley's geographic location provides idyllic weather with abundant sunshine and cool ocean breezes while the coast can be foggy and inland locations can be muggy, smoggy and often oppressively hot Easy Access Convenience, Easy to get to Highway access via Interstate 15 conveniently links Orange, Riverside and San Diego counties and all parts north to Temecula Valley. Additionally, Temecula Valley is located 1-112 hours away from four major airports making it easy to get to for out of state travelers as well. Southern California Wine Destination World-Class Wine Tasting As the only wine producing region in Southern California, Temecula Valley offers over 20 award-winning wineries set in an exquisite setting for the large Southern California populations to visit Pechanga Resort & Casino 24-hour Entertainment The all-inclusive Pechanga Resort & Casino with its headline entertainment, 7 restaurants, 522 rooms and 200,000 square feet of casino provides 24-hour, Las Vegas-style gaming opportunities and excitement Preserved Heritage Educational, Culture, History T emecula's Old Town features rich historical sites including several historical buildings, the T emecula Valley Museum, and over 640 antique dealers providing an educational and cultural experience that helps to tell the valley's distinctive and illustrious story. Special Events Culture, Attractions, Family-Oriented T emecula Valley boasts several year-round special events that have become major attractions for visitors of all ages. Many promote the area's arts and culture as well as primary tourism assets such as the Temecula Valley Balloon & Wine Festival and the T emecula International Film & Music Festival. ~ 59 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan C. Generate Room Nights As was identified previously in this plan, the TVCVB is accountable for increasing room nights specifically in the mid week time frame and to a lesser degree on the weekends. To that end, the TVCVB must focus its efforts and measurements on activities that will generate the targeted room nights. Within this core strategy there are several key steps the TVCVB can take to ensure it focuses on generating room nights. 1. Target the Group Segment J As was identified in a number of community interviews, many felt the TVCVB should focus on generating mid week demand with targeted efforts at the group segment As such, the TVCVB must develop targeted programs designed to attract this key segment As was also identified in this plan, a 5 point increase in mid week occupancy could lead to approximately $2 million+ in lodging revenue alone. This, in turn, should also stimulate demand and revenues for the other parts of the tourism economy within the greater Temecula Valley area. 2. Increase Overnight visitation from Orange County FIT visitors. In addition to attracting groups as a core strategy to increase occupancy levels, the TVCVB and the local community must develop and implement programs to increase overnight visitation from Orange County. While San Diego offers significant population opportunity, given its close proximity it is primarily a day visitation market Orange County may have potentiai given that its distance offers the market a quick overnight getaway with significant benefits. 3. Develop Strategic Programs with Southwest Airlines via Ontario Airport. Another effective strategy to increase visitation is the longer term potential that Southwest Airlines offers. As was identified earlier in this report, the Ontario Airport provides a credible access option for both FIT and group travel to Temecula Valley. Given that Southwest Airlines is the dominant carrier, it is natural to seek out and develop a partnership with the carrier. ~ 60 T emecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Section XI Marketing Tactics Strategic Marketing Plan A. Sales Goal: Develop group sales programs that generate approximately 6,000 room nights mid week. Current Lodging Inventory: Property Name # Units Pet Pechanga Embassy Suites Motel 6 Temecula Creek Inn Extended Stay Hamption Inn & Spa Holiday Inn Express South Coast Wine!)' Resort & Spa Best Western Comfort Inn Ramada Inn Rodeway Inn Rancho California Inn Palomar Inn Hotel Lorna Vista B&B The Castle B&B Total 522 176 135 130 107 99 90 76 74 74 70 39 24 10 10 4 1640 31.8% 10.7% 8.2% 7.9% 6.5% 6.0% 5.5% 4.6% 4.5% 4.5% 4,3% 2A% 1.5% 0.6% 0.6% 0.2% 100.0% Groups Target Segments: .:. Corporate & Incentive - (30-40%) Sales and reward based meetings. .:. SMERF- (30-40%) %) Social, Military, Educational, Religious and Fraternal groups .:. Associations - (10-20%) State or National Associations Sales Forecast: The sales forecast for group sales efforts is provided on the following page. ~ 61 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Temecula cve Group Sales Segement Forecast Model 2006 Base 0 (assumed 2005-2006 base rooms) Projected incremental growth in room night production 1STYr 2007 annual % 5.0% 2008 3.5% 2009 3.5% 2010 Basis 5986 299 6285 220 6506 228 6733 Association Corporate Incentive SMERF GOY Total National Statewide Regional 2007 Room Ni9hts 0 1200 0 2386 0 2400 0 5986 ADR $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 $120.00 Segment Revenue $0 $144,000 $0 $286,320 $0 $288,000 $0 $718,320 2008 Room Nights 550 500 2550 150 2535 6285 ADR 3.00% 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 123.60 Segment Revenue $0 $67,980 $61,800 $315,180 $18,540 $313,326 $0 $776,826 2009 Room Nights 550 500 2655 200 2600 6505 ADR 3.00% 127.31 127.31 127.31 127.31 127.31 Segment Revenue $0 $70,019 $63,654 $338,003 $25,462 $331,001 $0 $828,139 2010 Room Nights 600 500 2800 300 2533 6733 ADR 3.00% 131.13 131.13 131.13 131.13 131.13 Segment Revenue $0 $78,678 $65,564 $367,156 $39,338 $332,145 $0 $882,880 3 year growth Assumptions: $164,560 18.64% Temecula Hotel Community 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 rooms 1640 1640 1640 1640 1640 rooms available 598600 598600 598600 598600 598600 occupied rooms 430992 annual occupancy 72.00% CVB group rooms 5986 6285 6505 6733 CVB occ 1.00% 1.05% 1.09% 1.12% eVB grp rms/occ rms 1.39% midweek occ 40% Annual growth rate in rate runs flat at 3% Annual room inventory does not expand over forecast Annual occupied rooms will fluctuate up or down Annual ADR applied in flat basis to all segments, future actuals should be utilized Source: SMG Estimates ~ 62 Temecula VaHey Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Segment Approach 1, Corporate and Incentive Market Focus: Small Group executive level board meeting/retreats and corporate education and training. . Host site visits for target meeting planners. . Develop meeting planner sales presentation kit that includes gross capacities, service levels, destination amenities and booking contact information. . Conduct four annual sales blitzes to targeted origination markets (Orange County/Los Angeles), inviting hospitality members to present services/facilities to meeting planner prospects for corporate meetings. . Develop an annual newsletter to meeting planners highlighting new products and services. . Identify and Assist corporate travel planners and meeting planners with organizing a minimum of 15 site tours of properties, attractions and outside activities that meet their needs and create the desire to bring their business to Temecula Valley- South West California. . Create one annual corporate meeting planner event in Temecula including golf tournament or barrel room wine tasting dinner, spa services and shopping tours. . Send out direct e-mail pieces to targeted group meeting planners from growth industries with destination updates on the Temecula Valley region, including hotels' value dates and new venues. . Take membership within Southern CA chapters of MPI if sponsorship can be found. (MPI does require membership to sponsor new supplier candidates) 2, SMERF Market Focus: Education, Social, Religious . Develop programs to target wine industry including wine seminars, master sommeliers and other pertinent industry education components, Integrate food education and cooking components into this segment approach. . Target key Sports organizations including soccer leagues, softball leagues and bicycle groups for consideration of Temecula during the pertinent seasons. . Consider wedding industry to targeted periods if the fit works between wineries and hotels. . Develop religious retreat segments as identified opportunities present themselves. 3, Association Market Focus: Regional Association Meetings . Target 50 qualified statewide and regional associations to consider the Temecula Valley as a potential meeting destination. . Create a second tier of 50 prospects for continued efforts. Emphasis will be placed on the markets that feed demand (So Cal and Sacramento) . Develop memberships with California ASAE and regional chapters in Southern CA demand generation areas of San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles. . Work to establish site inspections for key potential prospects . Work to gain regional chapter meetings of broader National Association groups, mmI 63 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors BUreau Strategic Marketing Plan 4, Tour and Travel . Identify regional ground operators of coach and limousine services to facilitate small group tours built around wine country hospitality and accommodations with focus to off season and mid week demand generation. . Develop affinity tour groups such as vintage or collector car clubs, agricultural science or other identified targets Sales Action Plan 1. Tradeshows and Memberships . Affordable Meetings-West, Target audience is corporate, association, incentive meeting planners . IT&ME-The Motivation Show, Chicago, IL. Target Audience is incentive and corporate meeting planners. San Jose June 2007 . North American Journeys, - January 2007, Los Angeles, CA. Target Audience is International and Domestic Tour Operators. . MPISCC (Meeting Professionals International Southern California Chapter), March 2007, Los Angeles, Target audience is corporate meeting planners. 2, Direct Sales . Undertake monthly or quarterly sales calls within key segment demand generation markets to include day travel to prospect offices and occasional multi day sales missions . Host special sales receptions for corporate site decision makers at appropriate places and times to retain awareness and develop new relationships. One such event should be held in each Southern Ca regional market of San Diego, Orange County and Los Angeles, . Establish specific quota's for sales contacts to be made weekly and monthly within each segment targeted. Quotas must follow to segment priorities and goals. 3, Client Relations & Account Retention . Maintain relationships with current and past clients to secure repeat business and generate new opportunities for the region. Work with destination hotels to gain perspective of key accounts . List top 10 ten clients and actions to maintain their business, . Manage leads to a close by acting as liaison between client and hospitality partner to secure hospitality business into the Temecula Valley Region- South West California, . Qualify all details of potential business with an emphasis on determining key deciding factors. These deciding factors will be communicated to hospitality partners to secure the business in the Temecula Valley. . Develop a meeting planner section within the destination web site that provides for meeting information requests and response (integrate this with below web discussion) . Respond to internet inquires and qualified prospects by mailing out visitors guides, sales brochures and other sales materials. . Assist groups with hotel and non-hotel needs such as destination management companies, transportation, off-site venues, attraction, team building and all other hospitality services to maximize member benefits, EIlmJ 64 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan . Build a dynamic group sales module into destination web site that provides initial detailed information for meeting planners to undertake preliminary research on capacities and facilities 4, Research New Markets . Query Temecula Valley members to determine needs periods and targeted business scope. . Define and research sales sources to be used to generate new business. . Develop pre and post FAM/SITE tours for larger groups convening in So CA where appropriate 5, Direct Mail . Create a targeted and unique direct-mail piece that will be sent directly to pre-registered attendees for all trade shows locally to create interest in the Temecula Valley. 6. Industry Memberships . Join and maintain memberships in the following organizations for networking and new business opportunities: Society of Incentive Travel Executive( SITE), Religious and Conference Management Association (RCMA), Meeting Professionals International (MPI), California Society of Association Executive (CaISAE), Hospitality Sales & Marketing Association International (HSMAI), The goal will be for the TVCVB team and sales staff to attend chapter meetings from primary targeted regions. 7, Promotions . Introduce Temecula Valley tie in promotions to the leisure, religious, sports, fraternal groups utilizing affinity vehicles they align with . Place destination co-op advertising in selected tour brochures in conjunction with, members for group sales to corporate, association and, SMERF segments. . Develop on-line packaging programs to increase online sales. 8. Sales Measurements . Develop tracking system for guest rooms, Food & Beverage, and meeting room revenue for all definite bookings that are consumed in 06 and record actual sales results against these goals as an ongoing monthly and annual measurement system of sales effectiveness, . Develop a tracking system for contracted bookings in the area of guest rooms, food & Beverage, and meeting room revenue for all definite bookings that are consumed in 05-06. . Develop systems for tracking spending as a performance, measure to determine economic impact of group business booked in our region. . Conduct monthly sales meetings with members to address trends, targets selling and destination packaging for the Temecula Valley. . Invite individual members to weekly sales meetings to present and educate the Bureau staff and sales team on member promotions and provide business updates. · Partner with member to promote the Temecula Valley region by offering client educational tours, site inspections, and co- op trade show opportunities, ~ 65 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan 9. Other . Develop a specific group sales budget including expected room night and revenue sales volume to community, record monthly actual sales results against such plan, develop an expense budget that breaks out resource spending against each segment and in a priority that ties to the revenue goals by segment and to strategic plan. (half of this is now presented above, the sales expense budget now gets created based upon segments and actions defined above) . Develop an appropriate sales material kit in conjunction with the private sector to present a unified destination presentation. (now previously covered-redundant) . Develop a Sales Committee from the private sector to assist and support the CVB sales efforts. (integrated in notion above in measurements) . Adapt the core Temecula creative message to the group meeting segment stretching the brand beyond the leisure travel segment and positioning the group/meeting benefits of the destination. . Encourage add-on days to meeting and conference visitors by presenting the destination as one that offers much to see and do beyond business. . Develop collateral support materials that can be used to get the attention of target segment decision makers. (covered above sections) . Implement specific communication programs to targeted pubiications and online media database resources that serve meetings and conference organizers. (this is the start of the PR action steps, it could be expanded and identified as such) I . As part of the website, develop a meetings and conference section, in conjunction with the private sector, which is designed to direct meeting and conference planners to a final property. (integrate with above web site discussions) . Partner with local destination management companies to cooperatively solicit incentive business and third-party planners in targeted cities. (move to tour and travel and incentive sections above) ~ 66 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B, Brand Development and Promotion . Continue to include the TVcVB logo and positioning statement in every marketing effort inciuding printed materials, print ads, trade show booth and oniine initiatives. . Develop specific message points that promote the key points of differentiation and primary tourism assets that help to build and promote the Temecula Valley brand over the long-term. Integrate supporting message points into all marketing programs that target meetings, groups and leisure travelers. . Encourage all BID partners, the City of Temecula, and tourism related businesses to include the Temecula Valley destination brand on their websites and appropriate printed materials in order to unify all destination tourism assets under one identity. . Educate and encourage locai newspapers, magazines and media to use "Temecula Valley" brand name in their communications about the region to foster support by locals for destination wide tourism efforts implemented by TVcVB. . Build a photo iibrary of the primary tourism attractions including wineries, golf courses, meeting faciiities, Pechanga Resort & Casino, entertainment, Old Town, shopping and special events in order to support the brand and message points for both leisure and group market segments. . Obtain testimonials from satisfied meeting planners, group leaders and decision makers to use in specific marketing efforts to help build credibility for the destination among target market segment. Testimonials or quotes could be used in press releases, group/business print materials and TVcVB website pages. . Understand visitor perceptions about Temecula Valley brand through implementation of comprehensive visitor's survey. C, Visitor Data CollectionNisitor Database The collection of visitor data and the creation of a visitor database will be the lifeline for Temecula Valley marketing efforts. It is not cost effective to make an investment in visitor contact efforts (trade shows, advertising, etc.) without securing visitor data to keep that costly visitor contact informed about year-round activities and special events in Temecula Valley. Temecula Valley's future success is contingent upon ongoing, quaiity visitor relationship programs. The primary mechanisms for collecting visitor information and data include: . Websitellnternet o Email capture system on TVcVB website o Online monthly newsletter with "forward newsletter" mechanism to encourage new readers/visitors o Online ads/promotions o Visitor's Guide online order form o Meeting Planner's Guide online order form . Print Advertising o Emailleads coliected via reader service mechanism sent to TVcVB from pubiication o Leisure leads to TVcVB via 888# or website o Group sales leads to TVcVB sales staff . Trade Shows o Promotions (sign up/collection of emails) eE 67 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan o Attendee surveys o Online newsletter sign up fOnT . Promotions o Participant entry forms with email sign up form for online newsletter o Email sign ups on TVCVB website . Special Events o Online newsletter sign up fOnT o Attendee surveys . Leads from TVCVB Partners o Reciprocal website links from BID members, City ofTemecula, wineries, Pechanga, attractions, etc. that generate visitors to TVCVB website o Emails generated by partnerships, I.e., Southwest Airlines, ene, etc. . Visitor's Guide Orders (888#, website) . Meeting Planner's Guide Orders (888#, website) . Meetings and Groups sales leads Collecting visitor information will assist the TVCVB with more targeted programs over the long-term as well as help to obtain a visitor profile of current and potential guests. All visitor data will be directed to the online newsletter database where they will be continually educated about year-round activities, specials and events in T emecula Valley that will encourage new and repeat overnight visits. Specific meetings and groups sales leads will have additional customized sales activities. 0, Website Enhancements (See complete Website Review located in Appendix of this report) . Consider simplifying the Home Page in order to make it more user friendly and to achieve primary goals: collect emails, book a trip/rooms/packages, promote special events, and to order guides. . Consider restructuring navigation where repetitive to provide a clear and simple 'choice' for users, driving them to click on the links and take the CVB's desired action, be it to book a trip, request a guide or sign up for email newsletter. . Add unique title tags to all pages (while some pages have tags, not all do). . Add and maintain a blog to provide ongoing updated information to assist users and search engine rankings. . Consider purchasing a slightly more consumer-friendly URL like www.visittemecula.com. as the acronym "CVB" isn't as intuitive to someone researching travel. . Test and fix all pages that do not render correctly in all browsers including Firefox and Netscape. . Consider streamlining the booking process with fewer options. If the goal is to encourage visitors to book a trip to Temecula Valley, consider having one option only and include lodging, cars and flights within the booking engine. Similarly, instead of offering multiple links (get a room, get some wheels) to the same booking engine, it may be less confusing for the user to simply offer the links to hotels, attractions, car, packages and deals that are currently on top of the ARES booking engine. ~ 68 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan . Revamp ad units on home page to feature one or two larger units that rotate. This provides greater value to the advertiser, potentially attracting more and should result in a cleaner look. . Set up an email capture system on every page in the navigation bar above the fold. Include a more in-depth system that allows the user to request a guide, provide geographic information and indicate email newsletter interests for segmentation purposes. . Investigate deveioping specialized newsletters and customized email updates based on interests (i.e. wine, recreation, meetings, groups, weddings, entertainment, events, lodging specials & packages). . Create a monthly online newsletter for all travelers to promote year-round activities and special events to the visitor database in order to encourage repeat visits, especially during the slower seasons. a. Include the TVCVB brand, key positioning message points and links to the BID members and attractions. b. Include a "forward newsletter" option to encourage new sign ups as a viral marketing tactic. c. Ensure the newsletter is of the highest quality before sending to the database. Make sure it is formatted correctly for HTML, text and AOL users and for different browsers. Make sure all the links work and that the copy has been edited for readability, spelling errors and relevant content for the specific visitor segment. Test the format before it is sent to the database. d. Ensure newsletter copy is free of spam alert words, i.e., Free, Spam, any words in all CAPITALS, etc. e. To ensure the newsletter complies with federal law (CAN-SPAM act), include an unsubscribe link and the TVCVB physical address and contact information in every newsletter. . Measure the newsletter based upon opened emails.click-throughstospecificTVCVBwebsitepages.click-throughs to featured links, and increased user sessions on the TVCVB website. . Develop an online marketing strategy including search engine optimization, paid search, online advertising and email marketing campaigns. . Improve exposure for BID members on the lodging section (Places to Stay and Sleep) and improve usability for the end user by including a photo, copy and direct link to each property under each category like the Book Online page. . Assist meeting planners and provide better exposure for BID members and tourism businesses by Improving the Conventions/Conferences section by including listing of each meeting facility with a link similar to Book Online page. . Update overall copy inciuding current events, specials, promotions, etc. on an ongoing basis to provide continual updated information for new and repeat users. . Upgrade the Visitor's Guide and Meeting Planner's Guide Order forms to including brief survey questions about how the user found out about the website in order to track effectiveness of marketing efforts. Include a note next the email fieid that user will be added to monthly online newsletter database. . Implement a reciprocal link strategy with BID members, attractions and businesses in Temecula Valley as well as outside of the area where it makes sense to improve search engine optimization and to build visitor database for ongoing visitor relationship programs. . Measure monthly user sessions, traffic to specific pages, referrers, page views, desired actions (i.e. email sign ups, guide orders) and exit links (click- throughs) to BID members and strategic partners in order to continually improve the site's usefuiness and efficiency. ~ 69 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan . Conduct a thorough review of the website measurements compared to website layout/navigation system in order to determine if current website organization is achieving identified goals, i.e., links to BID members, bookings, etc. . Develop an oniine promotion to give away a trip to Temecula VaHey for those visitors who participate in an Internet survey designed to gather em ails, track advertising and brand building efforts and to develop a visitor profile study. E, Media Planning/Advertising . Research and develop a print media plan to reach leisure travelers with targeted pubiications in specific Southem California regions such as Orange County and Los Angeles, and publications that cover the southwest and state of California. . Advertise in Southwest Airlines in-flight magazine and as a Featured Destination on southwest.com in order to reach air passengers into Ontario Airport and other Southern Califomia airports. . Develop a print and oniine media plan to reach group and business travelers with publications/websites that cover the southwestern region of the United States and Caiifornia. . Negotiate value-added programs including free editorial, material distribution and website exposure such as free banner ads or oniine newsletter editorial as part of print media buys. . Research email newsletter sponsorships, advertorial and promotional opportunities with activity-specific websites such as golf, wine, meetings, etc. in order to reach targeted online audiences and to build TVCVB email database. . Research online advertising options (banner ads) for leisure and group markets based upon number of impressions. . Develop an oniine geo-targeted ad program by selecting certain IP addresses based upon a predetenTined geographic region, i.e., Orange County. . Develop local media plan including print and broadcast to promote year-round specials events to the local and surrounding areas ofTemecula VaHey. . To leverage TVCVB's print budget, consider developing co-op print ads with lodging properties and attractions for leading leisure magazines such as Sunset Magazine. . Develop print ad creative that integrates the Temecula Valley brand, key message points and the appropriate caH to action based upon target market segment and co-op participation. . Print ad call to action should include sales contact infonTation, free guide, specific website landing pages and 888#. . For meetings and group ads consider including testimonials from highly recognized decision makers to help legitimize the appeal and qualifications of Temecula VaHey to meetings/groups/business travelers. . Investigate signage and Visitor's Guide distribution at the Ontario Airport. . Develop a measurement system for print and online ads including generated sales leads, coHected emails, 888#s, guide orders, etc. in order to track ROI and areas of improvement. . Implement a website conversion study to determine the number of users who click-through to the TVCVB website from the various oniine marketing efforts including newsletters and oniine ads, ~ 70 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan F, Public Relations 1, Out.of.Market . Develop (or hire a professional public relations firm/professional to develop) a comprehensive public relations program including print and online activities in order to maintain ongoing media relationships and to pitch story ideas. . Update online and traditionai press kit and photography to ensure Temecuia Valley brand and key message points are included and fully represented. . Develop segmented media lists and talking points, including blog copy, for speCific travel audiences: meetings, business, golf, wine, special events, gaming, etc. . Develop unique story ideas that capture the essence of Temecula Valley. Story angles could include the following: o Wine o Oid Town o Gaming o Goif o Special Events o Outdoor Activities o Meetings o Value . Target appropriate media sources in Southern California (Los Angeles, Orange County) primarily and Northern California and outside California secondarily. Specifically target the following types of publications: o Newspapers. o Lifestyle & Epicurean Publications o Wine Publications o Wine Blogs o Wine Sections in Newspapers o Wire Services o Freelance Journalists o Travel Writers o Radio & TV o Guide Books o Online Travel Sites o Online Meeting Sites o Online "Lifestyle" Sites such as wine and golf . Distribute information to meetings and conference planner publications to position Temecula Valley as a viable meeting and conference destination. . Communicate with the California Travel and Tourism Commission (CTTC) and provide press kit and ongoing releases for possible inclusion in their press kit stories or marketing materials. . Create and manage monthly online traveler's newsletter to opt-in subscribers. . Write and distribute monthly press releases to targeted media. Include new releases on media website pages and update site pages on an ongoing basis. . Implement targeted media FAM trips with qualified travel writers to encourage coverage of Temecula Valley. ~ 71 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan . Work with other visitor and convention bureaus in Southern California on appropriate cooperative programs that bring in travel writers who want to visit the entire area. . Attend media events such as the CTTC Media Reception and Marketplace in San Francisco. . Develop a proactive public relations disaster plan in case of emergencies that could hinder travelers. . Measure public relations activities and program results based upon generated coverage, ad equivalency and press clips. 2, In-Market . Develop a comprehensive plan to communicate with the local and regionai media. Develop and distribute press releases about TVCVB marketing activities in order to increase awareness and support for tourism marketing efforts in Temecula Valley. Meet with local and regional media as needed to gain coverage and support of TVCVB tourism promotion efforts that can be reported and broadcast on a regular basis. . Develop an ongoing em ail communication tool/system for BID members, City of Temecula, Chamber of Commerce and tourism business community to provide ongoing updates about public relations and marketing efforts and results. . Solicit ongoing information from BID members and local tourism businesses to obtain newsworthy information to feature in out-of-market press releases and the online monthly newsletter. . Develop power point presentation for funding partners that includes a review of marketing program, results and ROI measurement. G, Visitor Information . Continue to enhance the Temecula Valley Visitor's Guide, Meeting Planner's Guide, brochures and CD as sales tools for the entire region as new capital investments are added in order to continue to promote a sophisticated and unified destination. . Develop integrated destination wide information system using kiosk technology (pictured below) designed to educate visitors, extend their stays and increase their spending while in Temecula Valley. . Investigate costs to create Visitor Centers in the wine country and Old Town that could either be staffed or include kiosks. ~ 72 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan . Develop a comprehensive distribution plan for the Visitor's Guide to include corporate locations throughout California and possibly the southwest, and in select California Welcome Centers utilizing Certified Folder distribution channels to reach leisure travelers. . Research distribution plan for the Meeting Planner's Guide in order to reach group/meetings/business decision makers. . Track distribution of guides by orders via 888#, online order forms, print ad leads, newsletter links, selected California Welcome Centers, corporate locations and trade shows. . Investigate distribution of the Visitor's Guide at Ontario and Orange County airports. . Measure the effectiveness and appeal of Temecula Valley printed and online visitor information with a visitor survey in order to identify necessary improvements or changes. H, Special Events/Promotions .. Create quarterly special event seasons that tie together all of the various events occurring during the 3 month period to create a larger attraction and to help cross-sell events such as the Winter Special Events Promotion featuring the Winter Barrel Tasting, Good Old Days Car Show and the Bluegrass Festival. . Create quarterly Special Events Packages that include events, attractions, retailers and lodging properties in order to stimulate overnight visits during each quarter. . Investigate a "Foodie" promotion that includes all of the restaurants, agricultural partners, wineries, farmer's markets, etc. to showcase the local and regional agriculture and cuisines. Create "Food ie' Lodging Packages with all partners in order to encourage overnight visits during slower season. . Feature quarterly Special Events and "Foodie" promotions on the website, in the online newsletter, press releases and ads. . Measure promotional efforts by number of room nights generated, travel spending, attendance at featured seasonal events and attractions, collected visitor information, leads, requests for specific information and website visits and click- throughs. I, Strategic Partnerships . Investigate partnership with Southwest Airlines in order to reach air passengers traveling into the Ontario Airport and to develop a comprehensive travel partnership program that includes promotions, air packages, advertising, online exposure, sales programs, etc. . Investigate partnership opportunities with the CTTC in order to enhance Temecula Valley's exposure in its marketing efforts such as a location for filming or to participate in cooperative programs that reach out-of-state visitors. . Measure partner programs based upon website activity, generated visitor information, generated sales leads, guide distribution, bookings and travel spending impacts to determine effectiveness and ROI. ~ 73 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan J, Research and Measurement In order to determine if the Temecula Valley marketing program is achieving long-term goals and objectives, it is imperative that the TVCVB creates a comprehensive system to measure the effectiveness of all marketing efforts. Temecula Valley marketing efforts have two levels of measurement. One measurement includes computing the performance and Return on Investment (ROI) of the TVCVB marketing efforts. Efforts can be measured through website usage and various costs per analysis of specific activities, as well as tracking the leads sent to BID lodging properties and attractions. The other measurement includes calculating the ROI to the business community generated through travel spending. Temecula Valley lodging properties can measure revenues generated from tourism through the analysis oftheir T.O.T. collection reports. It should be noted that not all of the marketing efforts can have a designated ROI such as ads and public relations that are designed to build brand awareness. Building brand awareness is just as critical to long-term success as specific marketing efforts designed to drive a particular response that can be tracked. Brand building can be measured, however, through the monthly user sessions on the TVCVB website in which all Temecula Valley marketing efforts are designed to feed into. . Establish an annual budget for a comprehensive research and measurement program in order to develop a baseline for measuring the results of specific marketing efforts, as well as areas of refinement and overall ROI. . Conduct ongoing measurement of all marketing efforts to determine if programs are increasing visitations to the TVCVB website, links to BID lodging properties and overnight bookings. . Establish benchmarks for measuring the ROI for each marketing effort such as a Cost Per inquiry, Cost Per Visitor Contact/Sales Lead, Cost per Click-Through, Cost per Visitor Guide, etc. . Invest in a comprehensive website reporting system in order to understand the webslte user's behavior and to identify areas of improvement. The report should track user sessions, site paths, page views, top exit and entry pages, as well as the links (click throughs) from the TVCVB website to the BID lodging properties, attractions and partners. . Develop a special events survey in order to gather precise information about the economic impact of events. . Once a visitor database has reached a critical mass, develop and implement an online survey to determine if the print ads and other marketing efforts increased visits to the TVCVB website. . Develop a visitor profile study in order to understand the visitor's perception, behavior and motivations as well as demographic data. Use the study findings to refine marketing messages and to better target marketing efforts to more efficiently reach the most lucrative visitor segments. . Encourage each tourism related business including wineries, lodging properties, attractions, special event promoters, etc., to collect visitor demographic information whenever possible in order to understand the Temecula Valley visitor demographics and economic impact. . Survey the tourism business community In order to understand their perception of the TVCVB marketing strategy and program in order to make refinements to specific efforts, and to identify if business levels have improved due to TCVCB efforts. . Review annual increases in Temecula Valley T.O.T. collections, ADR, room nights sold, occupancy rates and travel spending in order to determine the impact of TVCVB marketing program on the local economy. . Utilize and share the information with BID members and tourism business community in order to stimulate change and innovation for overall tourism efforts. ~ 74 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan SE!ction XII BudgE!t S Organizational StructurE! A. Budget The base year budget for the TVCVB is approximately $931,650 as indicated in the figure below. Figure 10 TVCVB Revenue Sources $83,750 $447,500 IrnCity Marketing III General Fund OTtO I Source: TVCVB Figure 11 TVCVB Projected Expenses $111,404 $304,936 $481,910 $33,400 !mMarketing .Sales DAdministrative o Other I Source: TVCVB ~ 75 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan In terms of future budget, previously in this section it was identified that funding originated from three different sources including City Marketing, General Fund and BID sources. The chart below outlines the potential budget growth at 5%,10% and 15% BID annual increases over three years. $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 r $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 $0 Base Year - Year 1 Year 2 Year3 1~5% ___10% 15% I Source: SMG Notes: Assumes City and General Fund revenues will hold at current levels and future BID increases will be increased annually at 5%, 10% or 15%. ~ 76 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan B, Organizational Structure The proposed organizational structure could include the following: Brief job descriptions have been developed for all positions. Executive Director: Oversees all administrative, operational and marketing functions of the TVCVB. Directs and leads TVCVB toward its mission. Works directly with Board or governing body on policy making and strategy for organization. Acts as primary spokesperson for organization. Sales Manager: Manages and leads conference and leisure group sales and services department. Responsible for identifying market opportunities; developing long and short term marketing and sales strategies. Maintains close working relations with area hotels, municipal facilities, and serves as liaison between the client and these facilities. Marketing Manager: Responsible for development and coordination of advertising and special marketing programs. Works with each department within the TVCVB to accomplish their collective marketing goals. Responsible for Identifying market opportunities and developing short and long-term strategies with the objective of attracting overnight business as related to tourism/leisure sales. Serves as liaison with all constituencies including, but not limited to, TVCVB staff, member and non-member businesses and visitors. Services TVCVB members through regularly scheduled programs. Public Relations Manager: The overall responsibility of assisting the Executive Director, team leaders, and contractors in the execution of communications and public relations programs for the promotion of leisure and business travel. Operations Manager: Oversees office operations to ensure effectiveness and efficiency; responsible for all administrative support services, including general office maintenance, membership records maintenance and staff support services. Provides principal administrative support to the Executive Director. Maintains membership accounts receivable and payable functions and provides monthly analysis. Assists with data entry, review of reports and other support duties. I~ 77 T emecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Appendix TVCVB Website Review - www.temeculacvb.com T emecula Valley CVB Home Page 1. Search Elements Since Temecula is a fairly unique name, the first search was simply 'Temecula'. Surprisingly, there are a number of URLs with Temecula - Temecula.org, Temecula.com, CityofTemecula.com, and Temeculalnformation.com. TemeculaCVB.com did not show up on the first page of the three search engines (Google, Yahoo! and MSN), but the Temecula Chamber did appear in the top 5. Search Term: Temecula Google - Not on first page. City of Temecula ranked #1, the Temecula chamber ranked #3 (which has a visible 'tourism' link to the CVB site on its home page) Yahoo - No listing on first page, though the chamber ranked #3 MSN - No listing on first page, chamber ranked #2 Search Term: Temecula Valley Google -last listing on first page. Temecula wines #1, Temecula Chamber #2 ma 78 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan Yahoo - #6 listing (after Temecula Valley Pop Warner among others) MSN - No listing on first page Additional search phrases: Temecula CA, Temecula vacation The CVB site did not show up on any of the 3 search engine's first pages using these phrases. It would appear that either due to the relative newness of the T emecula CVB website or a lack of site optimization measures, it is not appearing under searches for Temecula, Temecula CA, or Temecula vacation. Recommendation: Add unique title tags to all pages on website (while some pages have tags, not all do), add (and maintain) a blog, consider paid search ads based on keyword phrase research. Additionally, the CVB may want to consider purchasing a slightly more consumer-friendly URL like www.visittemecula.com. as the acronym "CVB" isn't as intuitive to someone researching travel. 2. Branding Elements/Aesthetic This is an overly busy site - while the top part of the home page looks fine, below that there are too many ads and flash movement on the home page that could be potentially off-putting for a visitor. It also distracts from the CVB's branding efforts. A cleaner look with slightly larger fonts throughout would create a less cluttered feel. The addition of an image at the top of various pages, just underneath the main navigation bar, causes some difficulty in that much of the writing (in white) on top of it is difficult to read. The body copy font is also on the small side. Additionally, not all the pages render correctly in the Mozilla Firefox browser. Recommendation: Test and fix all pages that do not render correctly in all browsers (including Firefox and Netscape), consider enlarging body copy slightly. 3. Site Navigation/Layout Navigation is slightly repetitive and confusing, especially on the right hand navigation bar that is featured in throughout the site. The various 'calls to action', while meant to be slightly whimsical, provide almost too much choice for the visitor, especially when some of the links go to the same booking engine. See Point 5 for suggestions and additional comments on this section. Similarly, there appears to be repetition in the things to do section, with Old Town Temecula featured as a stand-alone activity as well as in the shopping section and in the 'shop til you drop' link on the right hand nav bar. Recommendation: Consider restructuring navigation where repetitive (see #4 and #5) to provide a clear and simple 'choice' to visitor, driving them to click on the links and take the CVB's desired action, be it to book a trip or request a guide. 4. Key Pages Home pace - Above the fold it looks fine, but the mishmash of ads of various small sizes takes away from the page. The business traveler/vacation traveler option is a nice touch, and it seems to be a desired action based on its size and placement on the page. The lack of any link or box for email or guide request is a bit disappointing. Visitor info - There is quite a bit of information here, but it couid be organized a bit more clearly. In the Play section the sporting events section could be renamed Sports & Recreation or something that better describes and includes recreation opportunities. Other existing sections (I.e. backcountry trails) could be moved to this section and expanded to feature recreation suppliers (I.e. bike rentals). Dining has its own section as well as one under 'Entertainment' - which is confusing to the visitor. Additional examples of this duplication include Aerial Tours under both Aerosports (which has two different ~ 79 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan spellings depending on the page) and Guided Tours; and Winery Tours under both Wine Country and under 2 listings in the Guided Tours section (Wine Country and Backcountry/City Tours). This duplicate content won't help the site with the search engine spiders, as it is considered search engine spam. Unlike most other sections, the both the casino section and the wine country section includes a page on the Temecula CVB page with a brief description that then gives the visitor the option of going to that winery's website. The portal model recommends minimizing the number of clicks for a visitor to get to a destination, so the CVB may want to reconsider these pages and instead establish exit tracking to the wineries and casinos directly. This exit tracking should be implemented for all outgoing links (if it hasn't been set up already). MeetinQs/Conventions - Meeting planner section has a good calendar (which renders differently in Firefox), but the planner sign-up page shows an error after the user fills it out. Why is tradeshows under the meeting planner section? The body copy seems more relevant to the members section, not a meeting planner looking at Temecula as an event location. Under both the Convention/Conference Services link and the FAM link there is reference made to forms that are not available or linked to. Travel Trade - Note that the entire travel trade section (along with the Business Visitors section) has the exact content and links as the meeting/conventions page. Press Room - Easy to access, and a good number of images. 5. Online Trip Planning Features There appears to be two online booking engines within the site - ARES, Orbitz, and in some cases, Enterprise. Travel planning is slightly confusing since the visitor is invited to act in multiple ways (i.e. 'get a room', 'jump on a plane', 'get some wheels') not all of which bring them to the same booking engine. It should be noted that the 'get some wheels' link sometimes takes the user to Enterprise Rent-a-Car and sometimes takes the user to Orbitz. Additionally, as with much of the site, not all pages render correctly in Mozilla Firefox. Recommendation: It is suggested that the booking process be streamlined, with fewer options offered to the visitor. If the goal is to encourage visitors to book a trip to Temecula, why not offer that as the sole option, and include lodging, cars and flights within the booking engine? Similarly, instead of offering multiple links (get a room, get some wheels) to the same booking engine, it may be less confusing to the visitor to simply offer the links to hotels, attractions, car, packages and deals that are currently on top of the ARES booking engine. 6. Commercialization/Monetization Lots of small ads on the home page. They are all difficult to read, and appear to be different sizes. To provide increased value to the advertisers, and make the site look cleaner, Temecula should consider offering one ad size - a standard banner is 468 x 60 pixels - and have the various advertisers rotate. This could result in additional revenue for the CVB, as it can now offer a larger online ad unit. Recommendation: Revamp ad units on home page to feature one (or two) larger units that rotate. This provides greater value to the advertiser, potentially attracting more and should result in a cleaner look. 7. More Info Request There is no email newsletter option and no way of collecting leads, This is a pretty important marketing tactic that is missing, and should be implemented right away. While the visitor can access the guide immediately online, not everyone will, and not providing an easy way for the visitor to sign up, for either a guide or an email newsletter, or ideally both, is leaving money on the proverbial table. ~ 80 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Strategic Marketing Plan It should be noted that while the flip-guide that's currently available on the site is convenient, the continual flipping motion it makes as on certain pages can be distracting and possibly annoying to the visitor. Recommendation: Set up an email capture system on every page (nav bar) above the fold right away, as well as a longer system that allows the visitor to request a guide, provide geographic info and indicate email newsletter interests for segmentation purposes. Develop an email newsletter calendar (monthly to start) and investigate developing specialized newsletters based on interests (I.e. wine, recreation, entertainment/events, lodging specials & packages). 8. Website Highlights and Areas of Improvement Highlights Site has many pages indexed by Google (245 as of 8/10/06) Online booking engine Online brochure is nice for consumer's instant gratification Areas of Improvement No email newsletter option/database capture system Copy throughout is either trite, not relevant to a particular page (golf copy on the lodging page), or unclear Home page way too busy Confusing navigation (duplicate links, unclear descriptions/titles) ~ 81 ITEM NO.7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: 2008 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal PREPARED BY: Denise Lanier, Senior Human Resources Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve a contract with Travelers Insurance Company, as the City's new Employee Workers' Compensation Insurance Carrier for 2008; for an estimated premium cost of $312,280, which begins on February 1,2008. BACKGROUND: Workers' Compensation Insurance continues to recover with rates showing significant decreases. Because of legislation passed in 2004, carriers, who were severely affected by past "open rating" market competition and increased claim costs, are still experiencing profitability and are willing to offer reduced rates for this line of coverage. The City's insurance broker, Mike Bush of Brown & Brown, Inc. /CaISurance, requested eight (8) market quotes and looked into workers' compensation pools. In addition, he worked with several carriers exploring the possibility of the City becoming self-insured. Mr. Bush was requested to explore all of these areas in an effort to ensure that the market carriers knew that the City was serious about obtaining the best coverage at the lowest rate. All market carriers were contacted with three (3) providing quotations or indications. Even though the City's payroll increased by 4.5% over last year; the premium from Travelers Insurance Company is under last year's premium by $107,050 ($117,839, when last year's premium is adjusted for this year's payroll increase). This savings is the result of, not only a reduction in the experience modification from 86% last year to 82% this year, but a reduction in combined rates and schedule, premium discount and experience modifications of 28.43%. The Travelers Insurance Company's bid is $19,946 lower than the bid of the incumbent carrier, Commerce and Industry Insurance Company (AIG). Self-insurance options, were considered offering self-insured retentions ranging from a low of $500,000 to a high of $1 ,000,000. The risk of retaining liability at this level for each and every loss, without availability of a stop loss feature, especially in view of a major catastrophe, does not appear prudent at this time. Based on the above listed quote, City staff recommends the City's workers' compensation coverage be awarded to the Travelers Insurance Companyforthe 2008 Plan Year. The Travelers Insurance Company quote reflects the estimated amount for the contract year and may be higher or lower depending on actual audited payroll. Staff believes the quote reflects the best that can be expected for the 2008 contract year. Our Loss Prevention Program will remain under the leadership of the City's Safety Committee, which has done an outstanding job as evident by our expiring experience rating of 82%, which means that the City's loss experience is 18% better than comparable municipal employers. FISCAL IMPACT: No additional appropriation is requested, as adequate funds are available within the current budget. ITEM NO.8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Expenditure Authorization for Theater Ticketing Software Services PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOM M ENDA TION: That the City Council authorize additional payments of up to $20,000 with Vision One for ticketing software services at the Old Town T emecula Community Theater for a total contract authorization of $50,000. BACKGROUND: On March 31, 2005, the City entered into a three year contract with Vision One for theater ticketing software services for the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. Payment to Vision One is based on the number of tickets sold through the software system. The theater continues to enjoy great success within the community and has seen ticket sales regularly increase since its opening. The original contact authorization amount was for $30,000 for the three year term of agreement. That amount has been reached with several more months of anticipated ticket sales through the end of the fiscal year. Staff is requesting an increase in authorized spending for this contract to a total of $50,000 for the three year. Staff anticipates that the additional $20,000 will be sufficient to cover ticket software costs through June 30, 2008. Staff will negotiate a new agreement with Vision One for fiscal year 2008/09. FISCAL I M PACT: Cost of additional theater ticketing software services for the theater is $20,000. This expense is offset by ticket sales at the theater. Sufficient funds are available in the TCSD operating budget. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM NO.9 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JANUARY 8, 2008 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:29 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 3 DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar and Comerchero ABSENT: 2 DIRECTORS: Roberts and Washington Also present were City Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the minutes of December 11, 2007. MOTION: Director Edwards moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Director Naggar seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Directors Roberts and Washington who were both absent. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No report at this time. CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT No additional comments. CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS No additional comments. R:\Minutes\010BOB CSD ADJOURNMENT At 8:30 p.m., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 22, 2008, at 5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\010BOB 2 ITEM NO.1 0 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Whitney Vail Wilkinson Collection at the Request of Mayor Mike Naggar PREPARED BY: Martin Betz, Cultural Arts Administrator RECOM M ENDA TION: That the Board of Directors considers accepting the donation of the Whitney Vail Wilkinson Collection at the request of Mayor Mike Naggar and to direct staff to develop an agreement to facilitate the transfer of the collection to the Temecula Valley Museum. BACKGROUND: In September of 2007 Mr. Wilkinson, a descendant of Sandy Wilkinson who was a long time employee of the Vail Ranch, offered the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Museum the gift of a significant collection of artifacts relating to the Vail Ranch. Early in his determinations of how best to preserve the collection, Mr. Wilkinson contacted the Huntington Library and the San Diego Historical Society. These organizations were very interested in the collection, but would only make it available for researchers. With these stipulations he felt it was best to offer the collection to the City of T emecula. After careful analysis by Museum staff it has been determined that the collection is probably one of the most extensive archives of material pertaining to local history that has been seen to date. The collection consists of: antique maps (hand drawn one of a kind maps from the 1800's), surveys and plots of Temecula, titles and deeds, photographs documenting daily life, and correspondence and personal letters detailing the business operations of the ranch. Realizing the importance of this collection and the impact it will have on the education of the citizens of Temecula, Mayor Mike Naggar proposed this item be brought forward to the City Council for consideration. FISCAL IMPACT: It has been estimated by staff that the cost of documentation, preservation and restoration of the collection will have an initial cost of $20,000.00 per year for the next five years. Staff will budget the necessary funds beginning fiscal year 2008-2009. ATTACHMENTS: Initial letter of intent from Mr. Whitney Wilkinson . < September 18, 2007 Fred Lamb Board of Directors Temecula Valley Museum 28314 Mercedes Street Temecula Ca. 92590 Dear Mr, Lamb: Let me begin by introducing myself, my name is Whitney Vail Wilkinson, my father was James 'Sandy" Wilkinson and my gneat grandfather was Waller Vail, The purpose of this letter is to let you know of the desire my family and I have to gift the Temecula Valley Museum the large amount of hisloJical infonnation, photographs, maps and other items Iiom the Vail Ranch, When my father passed away a year ago, I took on the daunting task of collecting all of the history that my great grand father, grandmother and father saved regarding the Vail Ranch. After spending countiess hours going through the many items it became increasingly clear that the predominance of what was kept deserves to be in a museum for others to share not stored by one individual. I have spoken to several museums (Huntington, San Diego, and Tucson) about the collection, or parts of it, but I feel strongly that the best place for it is in its entirety, and in Temecula. My concerns and conditions before making such a gift are that the collection be handled with the following oole~: ' That conservation is accomplished on a specific number of items which are most fragile. (Several of the oldest maps, ledgers and other documents) That an inventory and catalogue be prepared in a timelv manner by professionals. And that inventory and catalogue be provided to myself That the collection remains intact and not be divided among other institutions without my approval. That proper storage and exhibition for the collection be provided. And that a certain percent of the collection is displayed permanently at the museum. That the collection be digitally recorded for future publication and access by researchers and scholars. And that all items in the collection are available to copy, or borrow temporarily, free of charge to any descendants of Walter Vail or by the Vail Ranch Restoration Association, That any images from the collection that are to be used for advertising or promotional purposes have my prior approvaL I look forward to hearing from you and hope that the process for conserving this material can go forward. sincereWtl::- , Whitney Wilkinson 3815 Liggett Dr. San Diego Ca. 92106 H (619) 225-1096 C (619) 972-1396 ITEM NO. 11 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Agreement with Kimley-Horn Associates for the Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail, Project No. PW01-27 PREPARED BY: William Hughes, Director of Public Works Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works - CI P Laura Bragg, Project Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Services with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. in the amount of $27,345.00 for additional design services necessary to revise the irrigation plans and for construction staking of jurisdictional limits for Murrieta Creek. BACKGROUND: Phase 1 of the Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail Project will include trail improvements from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road between Murrieta Creek and Diaz Road. The project will consist of pedestrian and bicycle trails with appropriate signage; construction activities will include grading, paving, striping, landscaping and irrigation. The plans and specifications were prepared and a construction contract awarded to lAC Engineering, Inc. using potable water for irrigation. However, after award of the construction contract Rancho California Water District (RCWD) advised that their recent implementation of State legislation requires the use of reclaimed water for irrigation where it is available. A change order will be prepared to modify the construction contract. The extent of the change and any cost associated with it is dependant on the design changes and it is yet to be determined. The Encroachment Permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) for work within their right-of-way was received on October 4, 2007. RCFC&WCD's Permit requires that the jurisdictional limits of Murrieta Creek be identified during construction so that the project does not affect the "Waters of the U. S." as defined by the US Army Corps of Engineers. The subject amendment covers the cost of modifying the irrigation plans to reflect the change from potable to reclaimed irrigation water as well as staking the jurisdictional limits of Murrieta Creek. The Amendment is for a not to exceed amount of $27,345.00. Since Kimley-Horn and Associates is the design consultant for this project this amendment is a natural extension of their services. FISCAL IMPACT: The City received a TEA (Transportation Enhancement Activities) program grant in the amount of $1,214,000.00 for this project. The Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail project is funded through Development Impact Fees - Public Facility and Open Space, and the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program (TEA). The amended agreement will total $68,231, which includes the original agreement of $40,886 and the $27,345 amendment. Sufficient funds are available in account #210-190-142-5804 to cover the cost of this amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Associates, Inc. First Amendment to the Agreement for Services with Kimley-Horn and FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND KIM LEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MURRIETA CREEK MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL PROJECT NO. PW01-27 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 22, 2008 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("District") and Kimley-Horn and Associates ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On July 24, 2007 the District and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "Agreement for Services between the City of Temecula Community Services District and Kimley-Horn and Associates Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail, Project No. PW01- 27 ("Agreement") in the amount of $40,886.00. B. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of $27,345.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 5.a Payment of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: a. The District agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B for services described in Section B of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. The first amendment amount shall not exceed Twenty Seven Thousand Three Hundred Forty-five Dollars and No Cents ($27,345.00) for additional design services for a total agreement amount, of Sixty Eight Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-one Dollars and No Cents ($68,231.00 ). 3. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW01\PW01-27 Multi-Purpose Trail\Agreement & Contracts\Kimley-Horn 1st Amendment 011 02008 Final.doc 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Temecula Community Services District BY: Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: BY: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: BY: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Kimley-Horn and Associates 2080 E. Flamingo Road, Suite S-210 Las Vegas, NV 89119 office: 702-862-3609 fax: 702-735-4949 Attention: Michael Colety, P.E. BY: NAME: TITLE: BY: NAME: TITLE: (Two Signatures Required For Corporations) EXHIBIT A 2 TASKS TO BE PERFORMED CONSULTING SERVICES MURRIETA CREEK MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL PROJECT NO. PW01-27 3 ~=~ "~"""'t nt_Ill< 2080 E. F1~r:ni=.~o RDM Su,leS-:!IO Lr.,V"r...,NV89119 Phone: (702) 73~-S66 Fax (702) 735.....9..\9 No....ember 6. 2007 PrOject 095382000 .Mr. Amt"C Attar, P. E. City of Temecula -1.3200 Bmule"s Park Dri\-e TemeclIla. CA 92590 Subject: :Murrieta Creek Trail- COn<iulting $en-icf'o;: Irrigation and En\'irOIll11t"utal Dear .Me _ Attar: At the City'", request. we ha....e prepared a consulting sen;ces request to design an irrigation system for the Murrieta Cre-ek Trail project that utilize'!> recycled \\"aler. Attached are Exhibit.. A. B and C for the-foe ..en-ices. The not to exceed time and expeme budget for additional services is $27,3~5. Please call me if you ha....e auy questions or cOlluueuts. Tmly yours. KimlE'y-Horn .ami A'5'Sociate... Inc. ~rA7 Michael Colf'r;,', P.E. Vice Pre<;ide-ut 4 EXIllBlT '"A" SCOPE OF SERVICES XOH"lDbE"1' 6. 2007 )/URRIETA CREEK TR-\IL - COXSlL nXG SER\1CES: IRRIG.UIOX ,~ DTIROX)IE:,\-rAL DESIGX SER\KES Irrigation Services 1. Mylar Drawings a) Provide revised Landscape Construction Plans as necessary, as affected by Irngation Plan revisions. b) Provide revised Irrigation Plans. This includes at least two (2) sheet additions. c) Update the civil drawings as necessary regarding the potable water and recycled water connections. 2. Coordination Efforts Coordination efforts shall be between KTU+A staff and the Project Manager (Kimley-Horn). There will also be necessary coordination with potable water services/meters, and proposed recycled water services/meters. Other coordination efforts win be as necessary with the Water District and City. 3. Internal Review Internal review is necessary to ensure that changes to the Plans provide that changes meet all quality levels as seen fit by the Principal in charge. Clt)' of Teme<:ula Exhibit "A" 11:06/2007 Page 1 of:! 5 4_ Plan Processing Plan processing required for submIttal of Recycled Water Plans to the regulating authority (Water District). The 100% Submittal to the Water District will be an electronic plan submittal (.pdf format). The Final Submittal to the Water District will be mylar drawings. 5. Finalize Adjustments Revise plans based on any/either: internal. County, City. Water District, or Prime Consultant comments. 6. Printing Prmting time and materials is projected based on the assumption that 18 sheets will incur mark-ups and need to be reprinted on mylar for the Final Submittal. Electronic (.pdf format) files of the revised plans will be submitted to the City at the 100% Submittal and Final Submittal. 7. Construction Administration KTU+A will respond to RF.L's (Request for Information) and be available to comment on construction issues in our area of expertise. This Will include up to six (6) hours of assistance (maximum)_ Environmental Services 1. Jurisdictional Determination Review project and prepare jurisdictional determination per attached scope of work from Bonterra Consulting dated September 4, 2007. 2. Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Report Prepare report per attached scope of work from Bonterra Consulting dated September 4. 2007. 3. USACE and CDFG Jurisdictional Limits Review construction condibons and stake jurisdictional limits per attached scope of work from Bonterra Consulting dated September 4, 2007. CltyofTtUleC'UIa Exhibit .'A"' 1l:'06/:!007 Pagel of:! 6 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE 7 -' ;: z w " z o ~ ~ ~ w 1. c . z . ocr: i: ~ Z o 1= .., !2 wo: ...0: ..,- :i:cii , - W ","'0 , VI_ ...w> -0:0: "'::>w :z:O(l) ><::cu W~;!!; i5~ ;:i)l z o o ~ ,; w " g ~ < . ~ ~ > ~ 2 =' .., 0: ... '" W W 0: o .., ... w 0: 0: ::> " ~ < " ~ " . .......... ~ . ffi ~ " c c ~ NN . ~ .............. w . z c F . " ~ w C i ~ ~ . "0 Y -<.I ~ ~. - . o. II ,~~ ~ j~<~. ,,(i ~! ~ J; J; j. c!:f ~ l!l!'''!;C: HP !:U,...HC.= . o ON . o . " NN . i ~ i . . i ~ . . i l j ~ '. ~ I~ !i! 1-'1 i't'o "lI .-, . '.8. . ",ULtI " W . - . I , . ~ ~ , ! . I . ; u . . l ~ " ~ t , j 1 i , ~ ~ . I , ~ I - "0 . i , . i < l , I . j 1 , j ~ . l . I , . . ~ .. o . . e j 8 IIi ~ 5 " z , ... !e.. ~ " < z o ~ S ~ ~ ~ ! W~ . ~w u- ~~~ lll<llw .. ~ W <Il ....;: . w ~ I w....2j.. ~~. 5 I . ~ ' o u ~ '!! ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii u < ~ w ~ ~ ~ > i . j . . . . 1 . ! , . , . i i . ~ . . r . , . . . ~~~~ - ~~I ~ ~ h ~8 ;!. t ;;; ;;; ~ , ~~~I ~ i- ~~I ! ~ ~ Ii ~ a - 1 5 .. . I ~~I i ~ ~ ! ! . ~ ~ - I ~~I ~ ~ I i, . 1 sill' 'I 'till i j II!. i d L I , , 1 , , . . ' , ,1 ~ .t i iJ I i ~ .! .! ~ ~ ! ! I . . 9 ITEM NO. 12 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Amendment NO.1 to Agreement with Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. PREPARED BY: Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. for security services at the Dog Park in Redhawk Community Park and various other security needs in the amount of $52,000, for a total agreement amount of $100,000. BACKGROUND: On September 11, 2007, the Board of Directors approved an agreement with Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (Securitas) in the amount of $48,000 for security services for special events and at various park site locations, as necessary. Since that time, the Community Services District has identified additional security needs at the dog park in the Redhawk Community Park. Security needs included locking and unlocking the dog park at appropriate times, ensuring that dogs are on-leash when not inside the dog park enclosures, explaining park rules to participants, and generally monitoring use of the park. These services are above those originally contracted for in the existing agreement and require additional security staff hours to accomplish the desired tasks. Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with Securitas will provide staff at the dog park from 6:00-10:00 a.m. and 3:00-7:00 p.m. each day. Staffing at these hours will reinforce that the park is being used at designated times and will provide on-site supervision of the park to ensure appropriate use of the park. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost to provide security services at the dog park in Redhawk Community Park is estimated to be $40,000 through June 2008. Staff estimates we may need up to an additional $12,000 for other services at various sites throughout the remainder of the fiscal year. Sufficient funds are available in the Parks operating budget for fiscal year 2007/08. ATTACHMENTS: Amendment No. 1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 22, 2008, by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("District") and Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions setforth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On September 11, 2007, the District and Vendor entered into that certain agreement entitled "Non-Exclusive Agreement for Security Services Between The Temecula Community Services District and Securitas Security Services USA Inc., in the amount of $48,000. b. The parties now desire to change the terms of payment for services and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 4a. PAYMENT. The District agrees to pay Vendor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. The amount shall not exceed $100,000 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869062.doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. VENDOR COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Jeff Comerchero President ATTEST: Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. 28991 Old Town Front Street, Suite 206 Temecu1a, CA 92590 951-676-3954 951-676-9624 (Fax) Contact: Rachelle Zid1icky Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk/Board Secretary Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869062.doc EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED Security services as requested. The services may include but are not limited to the following: . Securing City property as necessary . Providing support to City staff in situations that involve securing an area . Security Services necessary at City-wide special events and programs . Security Services in emergency situations C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869062.doc EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Payment rates and schedule will be determined on an event by event basis. All rates must be pre- approved prior to specific event. . Rate of Pay is $17.50 per hour. . Vehicle Rental Rate is 125.00 per week . Overtime rate may apply as appropriate. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869062.doc REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM NO. 13 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JANUARY 8, 2008 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 3 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, and Edwards ABSENT: 2 AGENCY MEMBERS: Roberts and Washington Also present were City Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the minutes of December 11, 2007. 2 Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2007. MOTION: Agency Member Comerchero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Agency Member Naggar seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Members Roberts and Washington who were both absent. RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT No reports at this time. RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS No reports at this time. R:\Minutes\010BOB RDA ADJOURNMENT At 8:32 p.m., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 22, 2008, at 5:30 p.m. for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California Ron Roberts, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes\010BOB 2 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 14 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: John Meyer, Redevelopment Director DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Redevelopment Departmental Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. Attached for your information is the monthly report as of January 22, 2008 for the Redevelopment Department. REDEVELOPMENT Old Town StrateQic Plan The Agency is working with the Planning Department by conducting a series of public workshops that will establish a new vision for Old Town. This effort includes, looking at the scale and massing of the buildings, evaluating the market conditions in Old Town and establishing an appropriate long term parking strategy. Six community workshops have been held. The recommendations from the workshops will be presented to the Old Town Local Review Board at its February meeting. Town Square Market Place As part of the Civic Center Master Plan, the City has created a development opportunity for approximately 52,000 square feet of commercial and office development surrounding the Town Square along the reconfigured Main Street. The Agency has issued a Request for Interest to select a preferred development partner. Six firms have been interviewed and a second round of interviews will be scheduled for February. It is anticipated that an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with a preferred developer will be brought to the City Council in the next 60 - 90 days. Facade Improvement ProQram The Fayade Improvement Program provides funding assistance to Old Town business and property owners to provide exterior improvements to their buildings and property. Funding in the amount of $80,000 is available during FY 2007-08. The following fayade improvements are in process or recently completed: Palomar Hotel - Paint Exterior, New Windows and Doors La Menagerie - Design and Install Wood Blasted Signs Chaparral Center Building - Sign Program The Bank of Mexican Food - Paint Exterior Door & Window Frames HOUSING Housinq Element Update The Agency is assisting with the Planning Department's Housing Element Update. The Housing Element is a chapter of the City General Plan and is required to be updated every 6 years. The Housing Element provides goal and policies for meeting the projected housing needs within the City. Diaz Road Exclusive Neqotiation Aqreement The Agency issued a Request for Interest to select a preferred development partner for the 30 acre site located on Diaz Road. Seven firms have responded. The Agency is negotiating an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with a preferred developer. Habitat for Humanity Council entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) with Habitatfor Humanity to develop a home-ownership project within the Pujol Neighborhood. The project is located on the northwest corner of Pujol and First Streets and will consist of 5 new single-family detached homes. The preliminary grading permit has been issued and rough grading has been completed. Off site improvements are being completed and building permits have been issued for the 5 homes. A tentative tract map has been approved for the adjacent property for two additional single family detached homes. The first Habitat Way Volunteer Workday was held on Saturday, January 12 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Pujol & First Streets in Old Town Temecula. The volunteers began framing and raising the walls, and setting trusses and beams on all five houses. Other opportunities will be available for volunteers, such as painting, landscaping, etc. in the coming two months. All are welcome any volunteer day during the build. Dalton Mixed-Use II On May 28, 2005, the Council approved an Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) with D'Alto Partners to build a mixed-use affordable housing project. The project consists of 24 units and over 5,000 sq. ft. of retail/commercial. The project is located on the north side of Fifth Street, west of Mercedes. Construction is completed and all 24 apartment units have been leased. The commercial units have been occupied. Dalton Mixed -Use III On March 28, 2006, the Council approved an Owner Participation Agreement with D'Alto Partners to build a mixed-use affordable housing project. The project will consist of 22 units over 4,700 sq. ft. of retail/commercial. The project is located on the north side of Fifth Street, west of Mercedes. The residential units have been occupied. First Time Homebuvers Proqram Funding in the amount of $100,000 is available for FY 07 -08. Residential Improvement Proqrams The program budget for FY 07-08 is $230,940.17, with $36,950 funded on 7 units. The amount available to each participant is $7,500. OLD TOWN PROMOTIONS/MARKETING Farmers Market On November 6th, the City Council approved the Second Amendment to the License Agreement with Farmer's Market Management Inc. (The Cunninghams). Since November 10, 2007 staff has conducted seven (7) surveys revealing an average of 35 farmers, 20 retail vendors, 19 food vendors and 7 Old Town merchants per week. Staff will continue to monitor the Market each Saturday to collect attendance data. Staff is also working with the Old Town Merchants to ensure thatthey have an opportunity to participate in the Farmer's Market as well as collaborate with them to create a more viable retail center for Old Town. Old Town Marketinq and Promotions In response to the merchant's requestto be more involved in marketing and promotions in Old Town a public meeting was held in which it was determined that a working group of key stakeholders including the Chamber of Commerce, Convention and Visitor's Bureau, The Downtown Association and the Old Town Temecula Business Association be established. The purpose of the working group is to re-evaluate the marketing program for Old Town. This working group will meet bi-weekly. Dickens of a Christmas The kicked off their annual Dickens of a Christmas on Friday Night, December 23 at 6 p.m., as Santa arrived on a horse drawn sleigh escorted by honorary reindeers. Free horse-drawn trolley rides were available on Friday, November 23. The activities continued every weekend through December 22, 2007 where dozens of carolers greeted with song and filled Old Town with holiday cheer. Souvenir photos were taken by the Temecula Boy Scouts for a $5 donation every weekend through December 22 at Santa's Workshop located in front of Calico Coffee on Old Town Front Street. In addition to the carolers, each weekend featured choir performances and Dynamite Dave the Elf, every Saturday and Sunday from 11 :00 a.m. - 5 p.m. Other upcoming events will include the Old Town Bluegrass Festival March 15 & 16, Western Days May 17 & 18, and the Street Painting Festival June 28 & 29. Old TO\Nn Temecula J March 15 & 16, 2008 "'I' l ~. \ J(. ". ....I/E,~ 0- l41.1:".~\~ \ ~ ;. ...~ ,I,~ ,.~t Bluegrass Etc. Sat. & Sun. Bluegrass Brethren Sunday III j .. r~ -'. .., Weekend Dry Campi~.g. in~ Town $10 per nigh~" . RSVP (951) 678-0831 SPONSORED BY .. THI'; i'1AR.'N \\)AR.BURTON BAND ... ~. The Marty Warburton Band Sat. & Sun. Tom Ball & Kenny Su Itan Sat. & Sun. Silverado Bluegrass Sat. & Sun. Burnett Family Bluegrass Sat. & Sun. PLUS ANDY RAU BAND, TEMEKU BLUEGRASS, HIGHWAY 138 PACIFIC OCEAN BLUEGRASS THIS JUST IN & WINDY RIDGE All concerts are free. Plus Plenty of Jam Sessions and Workshops Indoor and Outdoor Stages Call (951) 694-6412 or (951) 678-1456 visit www.Temeculacalifornia.com PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Certify a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, Adopt Statements of Overriding Consideration, Approve a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, and Conditional Use Permit for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project PREPARED BY: Emery J. Papp, AICP, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY ?9 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY roo FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080'{)04 AND 959- 080-00? THROUGH 959-080-010 (PAO? -0198, PAO? -0199, PAO? -0200, PAO? -0201, PAO? -0202) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULAAMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REMOVE EIGHT SUBJECT PARCELS FROM THE Z "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN" OVERLAY DESIGNATION AND CORRESPONDING TWO STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION FORASITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080'{)04 AND 959- 080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198) 3. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-8) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY -9 (PDO-9) AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.200 THROUGH 17.22.206, TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A SITE GENERALL Y LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959'{)80-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0199) 4. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ESTABLISH A 320-BED HOSPITAL FACILITY AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FORA HELlPAD FORA SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959'{)80-007 THROUGH 959- 080-010 (PA07 -0202) 5. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL, A HELlPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959'{)80-007 THROUGH 959- 080-010 (PA07 -0200) 6. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 32468, TO CONSOLIDATE EIGHT LOTS TOTALING 35.31 ACRES INTO ONE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959'{)80-007 THROUGH 959- 080-010 (PA07 -0201) BACKGROUND: On January 24,2006, the Temecula City Council voted unanimously to certify a Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and issue approvals for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project. Subsequent to the certification of the Project EIR and Project approvals, two separate legal challenges were filed in Riverside County Superior Court by the California Nurses Association and Citizen's Against Noise and Traffic. The lawsuits alleged that the City did not follow proper procedures under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that the City's Project EIR did not adequately analyze the impacts of the Project. In a Writ of Mandate issued by Judge Dallas Holmes on May 3,2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ruled that the City of Temecula did not properly analyze the Project impacts in the EIR related to a Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) plume in proximity of the Project site, siren noise in the vicinity of the Project site, construction noise, and the EIR did not provide sufficient differentiation of the hospital's specific traffic mitigation from the cumulative Project's traffic mitigation. In particular, the Court determined that the reliance on payment of fees to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) program was not adequate mitigation for the cumulative Project's impacts. The Court also ruled that challenges on other grounds, including: cumulative noise impacts; light and glare impacts; aesthetic impacts; landscape mitigation deferral; evaluation of biological resources; and land use consistency were denied because they were either adequately addressed in the Project EIR, or the petitioners failed to explain why these sections of the Project EIR were not adequate. In its ruling, the Court determined thatthe Temecula City Council "must set aside [its] approval of the Project and suspend all activity on the Project until it has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project into compliance with CEQA." Resulting from this decision, the applicant submitted the following new Planning Applications: PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0200 (Development Plan), PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map), and PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits) on July 3,2007, and paid for a City managed EIR to comply with the Writ of Mandate issued by the Court. The City then entered into agreements with Environmental Science Associates; Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers; Stearns, Conrad and Schmidt, Engineers, and Wieland Associates to prepare a Supplemental EIR to address the issues identified by the Court as requiring further analysis. On August 3, 2007, legal counsel for the applicant submitted an ex-parte application to the Court seeking clarification on the Writ of Mandate issued by Judge Dallas Holmes. In his August 22,2007 response, Judge Holmes ruled that only those issues identified in the Writ of Mandate as being inadequate need to be further analyzed, and that all other portions of the previous Project EIR are deemed to be adequate under CEQA. A full Project EIR would not be required and that the preparation of a Supplemental EIR would be an acceptable method of complying with the Court's ruling. The City then completed a Supplemental EIR for the Temecula Regional Hospital in November 2007 and circulated the Project for a 30-day public review and comment period, after obtaining approval from the State Clearinghouse for a shortened EIR review period. The City's request for a shortened review period was granted because the City had previously circulated a Project EIR and the scope of the Project has not changed. Analvsis of Planninq Applications The City Council has been ordered by the Court to set aside the prior approvals for Planning Applications PA04-0462 (GPA), PA05-0302 (Zone Change), PA04-0463 (CUP and DP), and PA04- 0571 (TPM). Therefore, to avoid confusion, staff required the applicant to submit new Planning Applications for each component of the project, and each Planning Application was assigned a new case number. All of the Project's associated Planning Applications (GPA, ZC, CUP, DP, TPM) are identical in scope to the applications considered by the City Council in January 2006. An analysis of each Planning Application is contained in the attached January 9,2008 Planning Commission Staff Report. Analvsis Contained in the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report The City Council has been ordered by the Courtto set aside its certification of the Project EIR until it can be shown that it complies with CEQA. The Court ruled that the Project EIR analysis of the Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) plume, construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts, specific hospital related traffic mitigation, and cumulative projects traffic mitigation was not adequate. The Court further ruled that all other portions of the original Project EI R were adequate under CEQA and did not require further review. To comply with the Writ of Mandate issued by the Court, the Supplemental EIR for the Project analyzed the following impact areas: MTBE contamination plume, construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts, specific hospital related traffic impacts, and the cumulative projects traffic impacts. The SEIR also considered a new Alternative 7 for the project, the former Temecula Education Center site. MTBE Plume Analvsis SCS Engineers collected and analyzed soil vapor samples in 2005 and again in 2007. On each occasion, 11 sample locations were selected beneath the future building footprints for the site ranging in depth from 5 to 15 feet. The results of the analysis from these samples indicate that volatile organic compounds NOC) and MTBE were not present in detectible levels at any of the sampling sites. The study concluded that there is low likelihood of exposure to benzene or MTBE and a low likelihood of significant human health risk. The additional facts and findings listed below contributed to the conclusions in the soil vapor study: 1. MTBE concentrations at existing remediation monitoring wells have reduced overtime; 2. MTBE is now a banned gasoline additive and there is no new source for this contaminant; 3. SCS ran hypothetical groundwater contamination models using the highest reported contamination levels at the monitoring wells. Even under this scenario, there is a low likelihood of significant health risk. Environmental Determination for MTBE: No Significant Impact. Although the Planning Commission has recommended adopting Statements of Overriding Consideration for the Project, additional Mitigation Measures 3.1-1 and 3.1-2 have been included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in the event that contaminants or hazardous materials are encountered during site preparation and/or construction activities. Construction Noise Analvsis The Noise Study conducted by Wieland Associates indicates that ambient noise levels (CNEL) at the nearest residences located north west of the Project site could increase from 8 to 12 decibels during construction, depending on the type of activity. An increase in the ambient noise level of three or more decibels (CNEL) is considered to be noticeable and significant. Environmental Determination for Construction Noise: Significant and Unavoidable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared. Although the Planning Commission has recommended adopting Statements of Overriding Consideration for the Project, an additional Mitigation Measure 3.2-1, which consists of five parts, has been included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to reduce the impacts of construction noise to the extent practicable during site preparation and/or construction activities. Siren Noise Analvsis The Noise Study conducted by Wieland Associates measured and modeled the impacts of siren noise. Working in conjunction with American Medical Response (AMR) an ambulance service provider, City staff and the Temecula Police Department, stationary siren tests were conducted at Patricia Birdsall Sports Park. Sound measurements from an AMR siren were taken from five locations at a distance of 50 feet with the siren on in both "wail" and "yelp" settings. The sound measurement data was input into a noise model which indicates that ambient noise levels (CNEL) at the nearest residences located northwest of the Project site could increase by 6.5 decibels as a result of siren noise. An increase in the ambient noise level of three or more decibels (CNEL) is considered to be noticeable and significant. Environmental Determination for Siren Noise: Significant and Unavoidable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared. No feasible Mitigation Measure is available to reduce the impacts of siren noise. Emergencyvehicle sirens are loud by design to alert other vehicles and reduce potential for a vehicular accident. The City of Temecula has no jurisdiction to regulate siren noise. Proiect Specific Traffic Impact Analvsis The Traffic Study prepared by LLG, Engineers evaluated the project specific impacts on Temecula Parkway and in vicinity of the project site. The results of the study were very similar to the results of the Traffic Study prepared for the original Project EIR. However, new Mitigation Measures have been proposed for the project that now requires the improvements to be completed prior to occupancy, even if this means they must be completed by the Applicant, and then be compensated through a reimbursement agreement. Prior to occupancy of any building on site, MM3.3-1, Traffic Signal Coordination along Temecula Parkway must be completed, and MM3.3-2, the full movement signalized intersection at Country Glen Way must be in operation. Environmental Determination for Direct Project Traffic Impacts: Significant and Unavoidable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared. Although the Planning Commission has recommended adopting Statements of Overriding Consideration for the Project, Mitigation Measures 3.3-1 and 3.3-2 have been included in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program to reduce the direct impacts of the project. However, even with these improvements, some segments of Temecula Parkway will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) E until such time in the future that the Eastern Bypass is constructed. Cumulative Proiects Traffic Impact Analvsis The Traffic Study prepared by LLG, Engineers also evaluated the cumulative projects impact on Temecula Parkway and roads in vicinity of the project site. The results of the study were very similar to the results of the Traffic Study prepared forthe original Project EIR. However, because the Court ruled that payment of TUMF is not adequate mitigation for the project, eight new Mitigation Measures have been proposed that lessen the traffic impact of the cumulative projects and identifies a timeframe for completion. Prior to occupancy of any building on site, the following Mitigation Measures require the improvements to be completed, even if this means they must be completed by the Applicant, and then be compensated through a reimbursement agreement. These Mitigation Measures are listed as follows: MM3.3-5 MM3.3-6 MM3.3-7 MM3.3-8 MM3.3-10 Add a fourth through lane, each direction at Temecula Parkway/La Paz Construct dual-right southbound turn lanes at Temecula Parkway/Pechanga Parkway Traffic Signal Coordination, Old Town Front Street to Butterfield Stage Road Pechanga Parkway Improvements, Phase II, a third through lane in each direction of Pechanga Parkway Redhawk Parkway south of Temecula Parkway, payment of TUMF prior to issuance of any encroachment permits for the project Three proposed Mitigation Measures are considered to be infeasible for the Applicant to construct. These Mitigation Measures are listed as follows: MM3.3-3 MM3.3-4 MM3.3-9 1-15lTemecula Parkway Southbound Ramps 1-15lTemecula Parkway Northbound Ramps Margarita Road from DePortola to Temecula Parkway The improvements to the northbound and southbound Interstate 15/Temecula Parkway ramps are fully funded and construction is scheduled to begin in 2011. The timing of these improvements, however, is under the authority and control of CalTrans and, therefore, the construction of these improvements cannot be guaranteed prior to completion and occupancy of the hospital. Also, with respect to capacity improvements on Margarita Road, this is not feasible because there is no additional right-of-way available to accommodate additional through lanes. Even when all of the feasible improvements identified in Mitigation Measures 3.3-3 through 3.3-10 have been constructed, some segments of Temecula Parkway will operate at a Level of Service (LOS) E until such time in the future that the Eastern Bypass is constructed. Environmental Determination for Cumulative Project Traffic Impacts: Significant and Unavoidable. A Statement of Overriding Considerations has been prepared. New Alternative 7 Analvsis The Supplemental EIR evaluated a new project site which was not available at the time the original Project EIR was prepared. The Temecula Education Center had obtained entitlements on a 32-acre site located west of the future extension of Diaz Road and north of Dendy Parkway. Termed Alternative 7 in the Supplemental EI R, construction of the Project at this alternative location would have the potential to result in adverse aesthetic and land use compatibility impacts, and lacks the necessary transportation infrastructure to support the proposed use. Based on the analysis contained in both the Supplemental EIR and the Project EIR, the environmentally superior alternative remains Alternative 6, Construction of Hospital Only, at the proposed location on Temecula Parkway. Januarv 9, 2008 Planninq Commission A duly noticed public hearing was held and staff presented the Planning Commission Staff Report of record. At the conclusion of Staff's presentation, Commissioner Chiniaeff recused himself from further participation because of the potential for a conflict of interest. The Planning Commission had questions concerning the issues of siren noise and the legal procedures following the anticipated certification of the Final EIR for the project. Staff answered all questions to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission. Chairman Telesio then opened the public hearing to public speakers. No one spoke either for the project or in opposition to the project, and no written comments were received. Seeing that there were no speakers or public comments, Chairman Telesio closed the public hearing. The remaining four members of the Planning Commission then unanimously adopted a motion to recommend to the City Council the certification of the Final EIR and approval of all associated Planning Applications. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Project is not exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act and an Environmental Impact Report was prepared. The City Council must certify a Final Environmental Impact Report for the project, including: the Supplemental EIR, those portions of the Project EIR held to be adequate by the Court; the original Project EIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for short-term, long-term and cumulative Air Quality impacts; the original Project EIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for noise impacts related to hospital operations and helicopter flights; the SEIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for construction noise; the SEIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for siren noise; the SEIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for project specific traffic mitigation; and the SEIR Statement of Overriding Considerations for cumulative project traffic mitigation. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Plan Reductions CEQA Resolution SEIR GPA Resolution Zone Change Ordinance Conditional Use Permit Resolution Development Plan Resolution Tentative Parcel Map Resolution Authorization of Shortened Public Review of Draft EIR Notice of Completion/Notice of Availability of a Draft EIR Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Report January 9, 2008 Planning Commission Staff Report I I ...I:c !:- ;Un I: ~ 3 CD (') C - I>> s:: iMCD fjii8: 0(') ~et ~o !iiCD 0:::S ::0- ~CD ):>"'1 ~ ] : ~ ~ 1j I IF! ii I , " '.., IIII' IPII11 I i ilii l!l'i'i~il!l'il! ~ I , I ,~: , I,ll ; I hli i ll~ S ' ii ' m < I! in" II! ! Ii. "I III II hi II II II ! PI; ~ Ill! PI ill ill II ~! I, III ju llii 111',11 ! ,I , '1'1 I ' ! i"~ i I" 1,' h H, I.' I., i'l . 1111111I111,!lpnl !il"!!'!! ,11,nq!j'l1 I I I I I ..,..'-.... .... In I I ! !! i, ..'...."i,,! Ill! 1"1 ! !' I 'pi Id . I --" ~I~rl 'Ii r' (7\ J 'I ~ ~'[~ lljl' 1!!l'fil7,1 i . i' ""I ; ~ f f , ~l ill o ... ~I ~ ($ I I pr I! , . , III .a~ .~ loll ::t~ g" "1': I~ i!!~ I IIJwlr!~!I~I!'!li~'!lll...I!lfl!iI/ -111,,11,11,1,1111, !ll ^.," j' j I . il~ en I' I'!i i I , -~_n"i i: I :11 \i.' Ii [" 1'\ I I I I ._-----~ o I , I , I I I I I ....................w :4e&l@," ''''t;' Illi e . -------~ ~ , , , t . -~~--~ t! pI :; ! .:1: ! II U' .all .<>) . I i Ii ,'~Ijlli Ir,II!!1 1II :r;~ ; 23 s '!!~ ~ it I 11:,I!!'I!'i'f!!II. !111!I'i!IPI!i'; T II;, i,llltlill, I',!!I rn 11 ;11. II VI , ~;l1 Ii- , I I J: f. . , 11 I ili 1,1 I " , ':,11. ill M'I i '1' , I , $ ! i: 1 : 1$ :') lll" 1 : I @ II i I : I : 'I '~-----!':',;.:"'-_~;;c__________L --~ ::-"to i ~ Ql ,I' ;,; I !: ~ -'=-if--= ~~-~~:'-.-=-,is 'i -I. II _I lIllilt ~ ~\.' ,I I' I 111 ,~ .~ I,ll ~I,I ~1,QlQ> ..~~ _--/ , III ' 'I," I Q>._--/- --------, '.' I: "II" "."ejQl i '~"""" [Ii,i'I !l ..~ I!' .. "II 1'['" '::I'I~'" ~I .... ,\, : . I! ill ..,11 ':--; ,. \ ,\ , " I, i'l II,Q> ''''~''''~I. : \1 Ii i', 'I ~~ J\'W' I ! I . i 'I' '!IQ> . ."" illl'jl'IU III .~- iii. Ii II ~I Iii .,,~~ 1::1/1 III III "''''--~" ~ i 1111'11 i:r\>--__~ ~\ " " ., __, I i [I. I ill \\ ~!II----------------- ~ Ql~QlQl \\\\h, '~i \ \\_,.:>-::.~;: ! ; i i II il \ I $ -----_,$:.':-1".;. QlQ>Ql \\ ~l: ~ r- , - _------- . "T '1 I ii' -""~ $fJl!l , I,' Ql Q>$ """ .- 'III 'I 'II II \ Q> Ql ---------Q> 'II 'I' ~ 1l1.-"'""'"", __-- -; \ \ I , ! I \ ~ ~~~\~.~~ ~-..~ ~<;.:--Q} " " " 1 I II \.. $ il\\ii~ .-.". 9-""~~ ~~-;::.~..- \ l ) , " I ~ Q> \ ", --------_ /--"':;s:----c.~"'".."o ,_ ~lij _" ".' \ -~---' I ,I. Iii ,:,">..Ql Q> J \~---.-:::;;":', /"0>----;- Q>~: ",WO~ I~\ -v--- I'~ Ii \ li~ * /t~ ~"~<",' ",,' I $$ \ \ ____I', ' '11!l'l '" Q> i" Q> /- . . - _ _p~4,,, "I I"l "Q> I' \ 11['llli illll! Ii' I \~, : ~):.< :~\ -7 Illll! Ii!! 1:1 ~~; II >rr':;\ \ t I: d ifli fi it- "/' ,,' \ ----~~-- --:r ~~ . \ :;! ' I II~ :1, 11 ('\-p-, -- Q>I', Iill \ il!!!, ~ = 1\ \ \ !,iJ /11'11 ~ i '-f\/'; f& ' Ql II il Ii:: J 'Fm\ I I : 1 i .1 I ' V \ 'Z'!, : ~ij t w.v, ~- i " I' II . -.~' """", ~ I 'n " Oti \ , I ' I I 'II __~''';;, Q> " " TT Ii; . I" '0 'j,j' , : 11'11 I o:lt~. i" .,'" Q>Q>, Q> ~$ , ii : ! I 'I _ . -",.'if~ ',! $ I '\ Q> Q> Ql I Q> I i<llQ>--'$-....,.~~N~"'-..~* : , --m----i _~ , I Q>. & " Q> I & ill> ..",.. $"'- Q>' , ' I rll."-- Ii ~"'~ 13)' \ f1j i... 'Z' it ' ~ -:1;' I ~,'!I lil!Q> \Z~"': I j :1 : 'I -,I ,1 'fI L. Q> Q> '\;;~ i !~ ~ I ! :;:. '.W $ $ "~,'\. ,.it; I I. 'I' .. --..._~ $ " ,....,. . :j ; i- i i , .-.--~~.-..~.._ ...._P.-x. , i ! : if. .' :<iJ6\~--;- 'Q>~- * i , i' - . I'P \l' Q> ,\hQ> ~ ", i 1!1!, ~'imrrrrmm! ~~~~-_ \" I'iii~~ I ~~ ra Ii I .i ! .r: ~\1 ",i - j \}f~ ., i \\~\ .'-"-1' ~----~.y-\!--.~ ~\k U ii f)" J ! i ~\ : I l' \\;.\ ! ~~,~\\ : ,t~ ! n l t, -.... -" \\ 'l'.... '''~.~ ' ,1 , ! , - C I \\ I \ I \':'" L____,_________,______________________!! I i 1 : ---- l: \\ : II ' , on " \\ r "I 1 ,) C::l I : !, I' ~l ill r" t- '9l II-- I X(i} J: 111 ii1 'i~ !i~ !l~ !I' lllP llif I 0 :1 " 0&} ia III ~ - ..... ^lli I,,! I. '.,,1 K ~l eE nk J Ii ill ~ UP I ~ I. $; i .. K {( Ii 1-: tU I U. Tn? II I' I I ! I I I I . i II i I " " . i i i! I !J i~J 'Im-:-t!--I~+- !:J~' ~" "I.,:~+: r.l~!!-----F j 0 : ! ! ! I i i-i . ~ I ~ P'" 1:\11' l'JIJ!i I 11'\1 f =-l=1 ~= i- ~:-JJ l'o,:dI '.10 . fJ. I "'-. p'-rt!lr' ! ,,' \-H 'i trMr: ~"~'9o . I' .;iiip.;, '/"\~L I i V--~ -' f'it I ' ( ! '.\.~A~i-:-;-' i i-,-'[JI 3lfr ~I~ 0 I' * ~, ~I , "'C-/ I-:::!::F-+-~- ..~. ,I ,. !. v 0 i I ~I '..ii':.i4ill'=~ll['=~~'llbl''fI:~ on Pi .i-'..h ~ I I' I 'I'!M' .__,Inn f-.i".. :~ I'" . I ~Il ~ I i o~ i"'" ,_.... i1'i ~ ~ , I. Iii "~, '! .. . p"lT'~ ' , 1 ! 1 1 I 0 o. I ] it," . . I Ii! I.". . . "11. .., ~I I I I .,1._.. ~ ~, !,. _II' ~ ~: 1- (T~' l'flb'J, "-1 UI!N1".d'~ . ~. rill,.,l" .:]' I" r-' ~~I !. . ! .1 l~lH- L_.J I' r. ,~'ffi 1 ,0 K!l~"" i I ~I f- ' l ' , I - 111:1 ~ ' .1 ~ I " (::I . L,_", . ~ , .. I ;:; · ,. .. , · i ' u'-<, r== I ~: I f- L L '.J. !::-J 1.11 I ,~.; '~I'! '.., '! '!'~ ~ 1 I" ,:n I" I- .:....' 1 I ! 'n, ~', 1__. lJoi.1i1 ~:', .~,' i. ~:: : l.: r11 r {~ t= ~. I.~, r'-'.:, ~ III I ~: I-.f, I. ._~j..J. . .. I .'. .~. . i *-[ ; f'= '=~t !-'-1";;:! ! !I" ,.Alii! '!..'.,I m'! I'W ~i III: . ~ I I I!!.!! '!!Iltlli1'I!! I II . '" f-: +- j -t i !@@[!PI' L[I\lIl_~.,fT. I I I i I ! ill ~ I! i i I ~~ ! ! "!! q! t f-' i i i! -'H@ 1---+--+--' . . ++ -.'!- ~'I 1.1 I [I, [ Ii, D 1 Ii i ;:-,: 'i ", I . i i [ I i '~i i h i 1 a I Iii ! 1:. ' i i . i i .. i P i 1-:;-1. i!! Cl I II . , . " ~. i .~. 'i I ",l!i m,,' I : J II ! ! ("- .... uL~... . . . ..1 !. . . i i Iii I 1m I I! . ,II] i Illil.' I 6i , , · , tH' It . I ,-j,I~1. ij ! H , I' ~I ~1I11 .. rr .911 .~ _...( n }ll ll' -;r ;I;; 111l11111~ 1m !lii' II' I!I~ llif CS1 ^ ,III' 1~1 ' , " en j, i'i! I I: - I \' \ . ,\ !\ ! \\ ! \\ ' ,\ !.\ '.\ "i.. ; ~ 'Jd J!-.:g. : ~, ti ~ ~ ,4 i b I, ~.... ... ..."'.. ....,. I i 0:0 0:0 6 6 I .. .. II I II I ~! Iii IIr '~ll Ii r :r.~ J; WI iil!I~li~ mr !,~ I!!~ illll .~ I ~ ~3 ~ -I In I! d ^.! i"ll . 'iii! ~ II " (fj ,. I" i ,. J Ii j I ..U 1ll,' '", ... l~ , ,,, "'Ir ., .....0 I I i i -0 '-0 '-0 , ] I i 0 ",4 '-8 . . --B . 1IU ."-""--(-> . I 66 6 o Cl .. ~j !i II ~l !HI ir :11 Ii f :J:;t J; WIWlli'llJ!lf!!~I!lrlir I ~ !l3 W .~ \ I p }g 03 Iii' !' :~ I ,I I 10. .n 11 -- .. . I a ~ ' .1 i I 1: ''''-'' T-- , j' Ii , 'I >[ I l r "-/ "- /'-. /'-. ~ I~ ---(1/ /1'-.:11 -.....J....-' 'I (' - ;~~ -~q " 1 II I , , ;...: t" co .. III ! ~.._. l"! ii I .. ,., Iii fiJ- ,ell -. ~ ~:= J ! 00( :z:;t i ~~ ~ [0; J;; li:iiI1" ml.,I\'!ijll','I!lllilfIIW (SI 6.5 ,I' II 1 ' i'~ (Jj ,. ,i : I ,I ., ;r ~! Is! I en 'il p . i I !! '~i.{\i.; ~ pl~ ~ ..~.. -a! .~ I: ~ ,",,- ,'"" ~,r""<~ " .. .."., ,,~~pql~ ~....1-.. J: Ill/Jlll'i,!I'!. Wf!'II!'lli!ill tS Aili! ill il!r lill!r 1!111~! .1 WI!:" I; .1, , I .. ", , " ~ i i I[l l!j I: ~ 2 I ~ :r.ii1 513 '9.CD F arn ~ -i il'I'P 'I!!i!. II - ! II J -: ~ ~I~i " II !i .' II I! co ... Ii! II ,I Ii !! ~~ 1 i' II @ '0 ~{' I: ...---....." ...,.. -J -. C 111 !'II I!i I-I Ii i--i ..--! c 11_..... I . ~ ., 'I' ,;~ , ~ ,,-..- . ~ ~ II! ,I : i ! _ i I '-'^<i'i"'i!j" tr'lt'rii;nrl.. ~ ~ ;!; i1i :1i o.;;t Ijl ...-i'....... ~ll!~! Gl .11 > i rr !I i ~9, >G Ii I ~ Xc;' ~3 ~ jill ~ -~ I. 111 ill/ 11'1! I!~ lirr !I, III' l,"if AI'i!"!"'l'I,!, ,I f.:~ ,; !' I I,l UJ gl !ii ~ 1 (s. I" , ~i Ii!! N .. 'i c c c ... ... III I'll 11 111 II " I :'" 'i'e, , . 'f i!f~ ~ 11 I:s' I~ l1Hi ~ ,H,~ If ",., i 'r i I !. , ~ t, Ht i! ] : c c '" ... 111 ~ III II h:, 1L, L II II': .i-. .--i-u._n i i i =:::i::::-'~.=:_::::::i:::::-~:::::::t: : '1 Ii ir\ I ! 1__. _ ,!, --j--l . i C III II '. i I I c ... II .- i i I 11i'r&::'I II! 1Ul- =LJ #HJ I . .+.-.- ...+.-.. ! ~~~ ~::::::: 'lliU[[i .... .. #HJ #HJ .i~l ~ I 5 I' ! ;! ::t.... . ~; _I i!2 ~ I>> :r IllI11rl~!11!ln!"i!'!'", I!if 'AIIIl- I, I:/I! l!f!1 c~.1 "! l 'II rl'\ ~I ! ~ . \JJ & i I, ...-..... --. ~l iiE I I:l i j: ~ fll o. i' I i ! I I --.i-. . I i 1= &1"- . t I i --I i .1 i I i i I I I _._,~_..l-_. --..i-.-. I I I i Iii Ii; ~0 ., 6 "'~'6 -- 6 -- 6 -. 6 "' 6-' 6 .- 6"cb I i --j-- . j-- I I I I ._.~._._.~._.-i-._.~._. i . i i t i I I '-'-'~'-'-j~'-'i'-'-'T', - 1-' '1- 'i'l, I -1' . i i I I:. i I I -T-r- II II i I I I (--r-'-- ! I i I I '--l_-1Ll_._ . I II i i i I Cl .. ti! Ii i I --l- i .-+.-.- .-+.-. I I I I ---i-j- --- I I i I -i-- i Ii j i i i I i 11.. I I I -.- '-'-i-v- -'-i I .- f '-['-1'1-' I . l . ." I I I ! I . L ._L._.. ..J.__._. I I I I i I i Iii, Ii -'-+'--1-1' . --.i-..-.-LLi--i_._.i-.. I Iii I I ill I 000cb -, ~0 _. tdJ~- '" 6 . w.. .. _. .. . rr~::ll I!~ ;;!;l 11:~i!lllliPr IIR II' !I' IIIl11llfl (S A . i ", IT i ' "'1 U'J'-~ II ,. , I , I Ii, ~ ~ i I i.,. l~ Xi;' 05 ~~ !l ~I tlml' w ] -: lil II '" i ! .. .. 1'1 ,I. i ! 11'4&:'1 I!~ ~. @ i 5=;1 g "3 - ~g ~ I!!.;; ;J; 111 iI1!i,'li!111'I!'lli"lli~1 e: ^.I I'i Ii If'llf ,rI I' I I ~' , VI I s fj I ~_, ~\ * I I s I -il' c .. II I ! ~~~ ~~. I i ! i Ii Ii Ii i i Ii ! i Ii i i n'-O. 1 i 13'_0' ' l!>'-S' ' 1!>'-6" ' '3'_6" ' '3"-6""t:(;f ~ ~ ~ Ra ~ ~~ ..;~ ~l.g 'jij :I~ 'i~ '!:<"l:< ~~~ X1: ~g .~~ ~ ~~~~ , ig Y 1~ i 'Oi ~ + + + + ++ ~l U~II! I 1'1' t- :! ~ II. Ii I: c .. 11 I ! ~~ ~" 61!i\ ~ ~~ ".~ ..J'"' 'i~ ~ I 13'_0.1 ! '-' I .y-~' I .~'-~~ ~~ ~2 ~~ ~~~~ 'E ~l ,j ~8'" "~ ,." .. ,'"~. l" 1, "I .~ 0, ~ ~ ~ H Ii r Ii ~ 'U II -.. ~ Illil'r!i'111!llr!I'I!I~llif i. ~. :j'; . ill ~ ~ -~ co ... 11 I ! pi;:,) ,!~ sj;:p ~ , 1 ! i~g I I I ! ,~. 7S_0" 1 . >! lS-6~,._JJ'-~' ,13'-6" 13'_5" '_ ~ e" ~" I'i~ "" ;~. "I'" ,!~ ': "!~ <;::0'1:< "J ~ 'I ,j ,!.,. Q, ,.' ~5 ,. 71"~' ~ :f ~ + n ~llllll ,. I '! Ii l'r tiN ..::! ~ ... <II '" , : J: 15'_0' ! j.g I '~8 , 'I ! i I lJ'-J" ~ ':~1:~~~ ,j' "~aj~ 'l ij ,~ ... +... :i~ 8;;, '18 6<"" ... .:~, -I.. f1;; o~8 . of; i if;' ~ ctI = . ~ ig ~ S' ~ 11!1~,iil1!i'111!i~ II' I!I~ 11If '(51 ^' . il,. , I · '. 'I "(I"i.!l Ii; I . VI - !; I J "WI - ..... _. 1: .. .. i i ! ! ! ~'-O' I 15'-0. , '3'_6" , '3'-~' , '3'-5" '-5 ~!~ ~J~ 0; ... 1'=.'''' ;i! 'i'i" OJ! ... ~i! . ~~ 1 ... 11'1' ~_:1 l!~ i ~~ !: " ...~ " ~'! -!- 'j b. 1 ... ~~~ ~~!j~ '10; H ! 4'-0' ! 1~'_(''' I '3'~ " "_s' . - '-, ~i~ ~w 'Ii ~~ ~~fj~ !j~ Ej~ ~J~ 'J ~~~i~ b1~ ~i~ 'j , . 0; ,1 ... ... ... ... ...... J ;z:~ I IT'1'i'r'lrrfT11f CS 23 -ilil.!,."I,! Ill! I }!i ^! I', I jl II -10 en -' I! a ~ . '1 '1" . , 1-1 ;IHI ~ I I 'i i ~ ! !.' 1 IiI>, I 1 i?8 I! j' ~"O' 'I Ld ! .L-'~'-Q" 0'-6" ! D'-S' '_ 13'-S"-J'-5f. ~, " ," ,I, ._~~ I" "'~ ,,~ 'I' ,I, "i''1' ai, cd, "~ d" ~"" b~O bj", ';'~8 6~ ~~bl~ .f' ~ :f + H :;l Ii! ! ~ I ! $'4 , "5"_0"' '3'-6" , lJ'-6' I! ,!~ 1!~ 1!j ... . g!", ~a \l:!; 'i. ~, 'ii + .J + ! 1 ! !!~ i I ~ , ,,",.jd ~ ~1~ ~i"'plJ?' ~j ~ji~J~ h~ ,1,1 ~f' + H il I I rr Ii ~ I 'a~ .~ ~ :1:;1 3 23 8 "!!... F S'g jI -.. J: I'll 1'1 I'llr !'il I!I' I" IlllI. l!lI.l. A llld "I'!I! liP,! ,IY!ill ~~ il I 1'1,1 Ilj \/J ";1 i ~ ""-....... _. l' II ~ 1 ': g~ ," 'LJ: I I I I "1 ,. "0 cO c, o . In ~ [~+- ~ i I o ... :11.' I ~___m___._.___ ~ i t! ~Ul' .... II , !r $L ::! ; ---~ Ii ~ ~ :r.~ i; h "!!.lIl ~ f!ti ~ WIIWrll~1i11'~!lil~I~llif ($1 ~.l I j i I III en 1'1 I!' I e! Iill .N 'I ! Ii ~ ' I _u_u,_ I ! , , =~--1! I ~~ po ~ r po ~ . po ~, po r, o ill .~ ill po ~ , ;~, ~ ,I ", III I: ~ ~E)! ~ )'-,: ._~ '1 ;1 ,I ; i~ x'" !lID ",3 if!: ~ -i- ~ 11'ii'IIiII!i~II~!lii!lrlllr (S! (); iil n III II r III~ ~.,l "".... "".............. ~!n l:l jl 51 i c Ii en i II III I i I I I " ,I I I ~ I I "~ I I l~ c .. II I I I It'-O. 11'_0. ,,~ "I g,c ')1 + pl. '" ~j~ ~!!:l 3~ ~~ -+ +' l'IIf!r,el ., ,~ ~.. : I C N 'I' ',~ i I I I ! i ! I ! k)&::::!L-J, 11'4 j ~i ~~ p!, ~j"' ~i :i-' .. .',"", b18 ~i bl~ + + 'f c ... II ! I i I I ~~ .1 .~ ~ ~~ ~! , ~ II ~ X~ ~ ~g ~ ilf~ ~ -ii" ~ 111"1!1~1!111~!i'l!i~llir I, ."". : L Cl! "8! Cl 5 ~Z 2 "P 20 N ii~ ~~ t ~ g . I c; " , , , ! I '1 '-li 1 ~ 'm ~ i if> '" -r I , J ~ o z ~ ~ '. I-J I ~ 5 z " I, !l :, I g ,al" U~ .~ il~ =. =, fl. ~ "'i ":J:.~ ~ 03 g .jg CD ji ;:g ~ -5' ~ ~ , i , , , 0 z >> ~ It 1 - , n J ~T L 12- 'T ,- -, . -'0 '"'" -f ,'. ]- .. -, .. , .. - ~ ~ I~-+ i I 5 - b z .. ~ , ~ ~" " L , I' , ,;+ , 'M- .. r,- :~,j.J.~ , '.14.!.. - ] : 'I I : I 11':11 1111 ii1lli~.llrl.II' i!lf !!Illr~ (S -I II ""lll 1.1 u::. CJ)!l: i'li~! i 'I :J~ "...- ,,,"" rr....._ i: \ ~i f' ~I!l i' ~l :' il ill,!!! '1I"III'i" ,'Iii"! III ih!!j'll II!!jl! 'I! lI;il" ! ,b,. Ii 'Ill' 'l 'hi P i'" I" ,.~~i I'~~k~ i I ili~ !!i~;~ ,Iilr !Il :.I! !. 'I~;~ ~ 121 I' -' ., "1 Ii, II! i.' il.~ 2! Clg!1 -0' ~Z I /.0 00 ~1lJ ,. c! II' ,~ ~ I'll f III r ',;,!I'II!I!!!11 li!II'!I!.. ~; ',! i l!!'I'1 'Iii" ill " I"'" '1'1 i' ','! ~ lqa ~ l~~~f:i !, "1'" ..' " I;! 'hln UI' 'l ',! !. '1<1" .1 I I" ; i 1'1 i i!1I !; I' l~ i: li! ~~I' I ; i l I~ ,I -IE ~ ~~q~ !.~ l'~ f!.~f!~~~t~~q I n~i~i.~i~!hl ' I ' I ~ I h ~ I i q i ~ ~ q ,. . ... -~ . ~ ~ . ,.. ~ " '"' '1111"'11' ,. "!' 'I'r,'! I, "I' 'I 'i._ I ld I ~~ q~~~ iq~!t h ~sJt I! 'll,i !!i1li'!;liii 'Iii IIlI",lliilll!11 I,'illll " 1'1 "", II,' I ,II: ill11 II! till II i, ! ,I.dl! ,.. ,I!' !I lIIP'I'ill 11,'i Ii I l,llii,j !:i I.il' !; '!'nll' :'I I'! ~, :!' i I !Ii iii ~ i uJJ!d ;!! II I I"". i ~~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ , i':lilij !!II,! ,1.1 :i j! II;: ! ~I !~ Ii ~ ! ~ III .1, h' " i II'" 'I " . d I I " " ! " P ~~ ~~ ~~ , II l! ! Ii !I I j' n , , d I' ~l . -~ ~ - ~ ~ l llinli' lill!!l I!!I!!I !il!h !idi! . -Iii'! ' i'n; I ol&~~~ E !iii,i i ~ -3~~ ... 9 fi.i~ i " .,;.; "1'lllllli"I'i'IIIII'=!"'" I. I I' 1.11 l'lilll, ,!!.. ""'!" ii' -" 'I' I ~ tq, ~..~-~ ~'q !~'~h.ll .1' : ~ ~~ d'l! 'I'I'~I ~Ihlll' ..- "j! '.!!. ",h!'ll !. ll!l! i :rili I' !NlIlilj! I! Inl I !lll,i! 11!!ll!I'llll '.. "~ ' ,!,.dlll ,. I il i !" 11 !'I!!!I'! . ; q .11 , .1,.\, I" I II i I U i ~~ ~ ~ i in I ~ ~ .. . , Ilil!illili,iillliijl!:iiljimiijii!!I!!!lj i 111!1!11111!lll!ii!!,iijll!illi!JI!!1 iil!! I IIII! i,lll !IIII! ~ ili ,Iiil "',llnl i I.! ~ !i l!illl! " , iiI,- q""'1 ' Il! ,! i! .I!! l! Ii ii', i! !'Ii! 'I i.l~', ! Iii ! 1,1 j'..I, i 1"1 i . II'! ' I " !i I ! 'I !n~' I ~!, !! '!,I!!I : !I ,! !e"'!I!I Ii' 1'"1' I , !! !!'li'!' ~ !lli! ; !ll. iI I II i: .: i'l! I ! hi iln"II! 10. I 'I I!' I !'! I I'll! I I , " ~~ ~ i , , , liil!liii!! Ii II ill 1111! lill !I,', i!!i~I'i !llii III 'I! II! IIII :!i 1!IWI,'i 1111111111 '1'1111, ' 'j ,,, 'i" I ,loll 'I Ii .1' "ill' .' II I" I !! Iliiii!~li! I Ii I! I!iil"ii iiil! i; 'I iil iil'l! I I! !hii I lj !!I!I!lqi ! Ii !I' III!I Ili!l!! II Ii "Ii ill I! !llll! I f II II i II ~ II I" 1:11', dll'!! illi !. Ii! II! I "" ii' ,I ~!l, 'In' i., I .;' I~ ll( i - ~ 8~ ~ . , , !III I !" ,!;~ "I' .,", ~r I ~ ai I~ ~! "I': l!l'~ " ,," ,,,.: ! ;'ill';!' ,Iill' I! II "!!l Wi ,Ii dlll,I!!I;!!' III .!! i' :ll'! II " I! ,!."H' II '! iliPli!! II I, 10 '1"1' i "'~ ~~ ~~ll , I' I',l!:' I I " , " . , lnJL '/II !iillll!!il!!!i!i!!I!il~1 Ii I'"l ,,' !!''''G'fj , I. .1, ii. II! lll"l~"! !" 9 'I :! ',!liiillg'I,ill::U ~ i~ ~~R 'I~ ~dt ~ u~ 'I.!; 'li ill ilill! II !' .i .~~ i!, ~. ~~ ~ . I 11~!!lI,rlll!lir Wr' !l~ i!l~ 1m! (S -ill!i '!" ..1" I,.li~ I ^ .i. .' . i l'!~ (fJ " ., ~ . . . , - ~ !i -i In ~o t~ X?c: "or-... ~o o. . ;i " :t "''''''' ",ii1 OJ ~~ '" 000 ~ 000 " P 00 ii1 :<:<:< ~ " :g " ~ !i I i Ii i I, J' !: if i " .i !1'1 I il"i [Ii !I' ~-J1 ! " I , .. i! :! ii! , J I . '" ~ : I I l" : ". j !;.6ji 1 ''''I Hl'i "~I i ~ I II ! \ II. l' "10; ~_ i " '"~>I~ ., 1- "I" , ,,: ,j ~ '::~<.:~ !i [ j I -Iii ,",," ,Ii; I" ~~~ >! \~\ "'~('y ~[;l: :,, ~ ~~6 <) 'Ilo1>e, . ;; ~"~ ; ~ ,,~Oo:, ~"'.., ;;f: r I:I~' !ii; /~~~ ~~!! i '~-4"/I. ;;1.I,i !.J,.--/" ~ ~ ;' y "'~ ~_m~"!"_i,,. I ~\i'f" ; I, ; ~:;; :,;l~~,'Lj ~g~ :;Ii f'.;";!'''' ~?:, j 1,.:.."- "" .j. I ' "", " ~ ~ , is: i r i; I i ii Ii I i l~ i 1 i:".=_"'~'~~.."",, ...J I ~-_~ll:':~ ;-.w.s<, I c .\: I ~ ( " \\ I~\ I II \:r~'~.L !J 'oo..i~' .""",,....""". " i:j --ur ali:~ ~~~ s"'~ t~i ~. ~i ~~ Ii il!~~ ~!l 'Ii ~:~ "I .: ~::i~ _', ~;::.." tS~ ~~~::,,~ ~~~_f <'l~Q~ ~ ',i''< ~[;i -::::~;;; ...... :: -"-":'ii:. fi; "~ . ~'1!1:!_ ;~~~ ;iH "!~ .:::<::::::::::::::::.:'\,\\~ '. .1 'U '. ""'W'~"~\.< "<>?~ ~. ., " ",01"-'1' \" " \', ~ ni ,1'~ ?~~~ ~ '" ,,<<~~"" ~ c~":1\~,;>q..o ~I ~ ..,."."'l.,*% ' 0;. ~'Z? ~ ~,,~<'o <>-, I "'1';>"" I" ~ ('~ : -", 's" M <:t::>~'(;" i 'I; & <>-"/> <' :---------------------~-"l ,~ , I I . ".-. -'. "-'-'--. -'.. '~"-'-'''''''' ..... 'i:i..<('''''r".,;m"~,.-",-",,,"v;.Q: r\q1/.>>;(;,""",,,,^..~,,"~,,,'Ml:"S("'=, ICMmn""">r"WrFr~ ""J!k,,~)C~."rr_-"r,.>l ", "'l-1'~ ;;", ',+, ...."'C'.." '~1' <i-~:'!/" ~"1> " ~~~ ~ !l Ii .' ~ ~ I ;;; ill:! ' iii ::::: ! ~ :,' <~,; :,,~ ~.~, ~ ~, :,! ,,"' ,,; iii i i I i~ ,,:::: " 'I~ p~~~~::~~~ is gacr~a~h;:" g Hi:.'i;~ ,,~ ~ ~!ii ~:<l ~., ~ , ~~:::~i::~@~~ ~ ~;j~;,l~~*'-1~ 111 ~e~tt: :~ >- ;1;:1l(';ij" ;'i l',,," I. " }:3;,J;;:~~ - <l 111 -!~~:,3; 'BA '!"'~~~B "11 "i6!tl~ ~~ 1l9~"<1l<5 ~<1 ::t ~i't~~t~ ~~ ~~-S>A~ ~ 1;";1;;:; !l.;;: ~ .u;~S' ;;;!) ~e6s:~W lO;::t 0"'.. "' ~gllt:~", ~~ ~~~~.; "~ 0" , ~ , l? , I I , , j I , I Ii i ., 1i i i'i :i ,; i i., i \, i , \ ~\\'\ ~'5 _______ \ . ~ \\\ '!,<" '. \ \ \ -<--""":q" \.:.\.' ~~!"~ '\. %, Ii \ \ .----\:.\ \. \ .....---- \\.' \ \ .....---- .,. \ ~ \,,\. '\ ;<>-'~% "\~''.\ " ;' ~.:":' '\:..\ \\. --c-<. \,\. ,..,----:.:.- -.~ \~f::;;;~ ~'r:t:.:.~\ (" o ~:. :~~.;;\,' \ " "'c -- "'1 fi', \ "\\ "'<:'~i._t-J(C_'_ I" \ . ~~w- ..{:s' ~~:<o1- .' \ '~lf~ 4~4:ii:-':" J "\'. \ ;, 't.\~'&4--o"'m%s ,', '':t'1 . -':'~"t<"" ~~ ',>\_' , ~~'>'i3. ~~,>~,. \ ~~~n'4}\.\ if >'..c,,"",~_~ . 'I~ ! ]';~i ,'.~ I~~il : 'i '1.\ .,^' ... ~. I ~i ::.:::----...-...!i f ~h.;~ ~..,~ > -,i i ~: "-'.. ..-J i # ~il'~~,,;:<:''''.:-Il 0 " ,'J _ !: i ~ ~ i' r '''ro.:,,'''- "i! ,,- 'ii "" "-.\t}u!,,~ '. I~: ~ ~:! i ! "'"~"r~ i:,,,-! ".! >, it: ., i' i 'i " -o:-~'\. 'l'"'9,1,t ~b >. " ~ .",t, "'l1 :::dif:-. .-..J!;' :',:-.., ,,- ::;~";, i i '.~;;~~~ H ~"- .:;;" ~.r,.-"1."" 'i':':<<O~ '>, -"-'1.>", ?:l-%.~ '" l! ~!i.." ii;'" - !.,~ ,I ~ ~~~-: ;;:"', ~ ~-h C'\ ~ 8111;:<'< ~ ~ ,~~~ ~ ~ "-~f :>: !} ;~~~ ~ !l ~ ",' ~ ~!~ ij ~ U~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~~8 ~ ;:!~i ;,: ~A~ i" 7~'~~~ I I ~; " ~.:.: ~ . ~ . 1_ ~ " ~ "4-f'('<'( r~~J "-., ''':ffi,.'>o ''1i'~~ ~ i!" ,', f:;,~ i'j~R ~l 1'1 ~ FI~~ ~~ ~~ ~ X ~ ~'" E~<:~'"i5.~'l): .. ~..~~ ~gi~Bl?1 ~~& ~ ~~,,~ ~~ >:;r;,l:" ~.!':~~ ~i~~~~ ~~a~ ~ ~~ ~~~$~~ ~ E~i'!: ' ~.!': "li!'1 ,'il 1.l&i~ ~~ 1J~.\ ~ ~~~-.e~ ~~ .. ;::::1$ h;>< ll~~ ~ Mil ~~ ~H; ~~tl ~ ~ " " " '!~ ~ i I H " u ~fil !I " II, ~I~ ~ fi1 ~ ~ 2::1 ~~ (g 111 ,,0 ~ ~ "'1J "'o~ )a )!~~ JJ I~m~ n ~o t III . ~""g I'"" "'';I" gll:'l!i!:> ""i:Cl:I-l~ "",-< ...... '0_ ;ll~_ tl)3;! U '" ;l;~ :z iil~ (0) I\) ~ 0) (X) T !i: 't ! ! 'I: " I: I: ""'--~-- I~_"_...- !.,._..~--, .... f ! ; , . . :00: . , I""! 'n I ~ ~ ~ ! ... ! o , rr- - ,-/-.... I i. . .'1 1 .I 'all .1$} I i I ~~ " I i '1l1"1111'; !; II'! ! 1" .1 1'1'11 IiI! it Ill. jl,!I Ii I i'!l!!H I ~l! '~p i il', !l,t . .~ - III IIIIIUliJ ClJe~" .~ -eeo l!i.i!mWllil!!lllilll! ~ iP11l! !II.'! ! I Ii Inll ~H II III !IIIP I! !i ' II! ~ 1; ii' I! II! Ir: · ! I II Ii',! .! !,! I i I ~ , I !' I' g . ! I! I! . ; I " J 1 . ; { .1 . r" 'i/ lj ! 11 I " . o . Ii I ~ " i I ! . !j I Ii i I :i!IPi! Ilium Ij'lP I!lH II:mwHllJ n 11 'Itr Ili<I'< ,II J" ii' '11111111 0- ~\ ifl!ll!1 !!1!~1!H ,'m Il1m Uli!iI1!",!l!ill ~ ~ II ", IHII'1 11, II' ,.11< \ "'1'" ~ z "I11f1 1 IS rt 'I i i U Sti l.g rl~ 1~1 . J 1!:liJ' ljljtiiil l,lll'IJ11 !!!!llrjii:1!l E ~ , Il'Jl 'll1l'l 't" !llt 1/11 1111l!'1I . H Wi H llill!ij lii! '111'1 ji:!Wij'ih! ~. 'J " I I! 'I. ,II 11,1 .1. Ill!1 : z \.i . J t I' " Ii fiilllI ~ x;, 3 ~ 3 g "C lD t: ::+0 P me ~ -;- . I li'l "/1'1'11 P'!!!'i'l!! !p'!l gill c.s - ,I'~!! r lip!1I ill i! Ii! lli!1 ~ ^;i .. "', I[ ~ 'I 'Iii (J) !~ 3 ~ I ~ , , I jl II 'j ...~ 1 , ,. i~ ~ .(J> "111 'n 1-0 ~ J> ., ;\I o C -0 rn I~ Ii I~ iI! 'I" It'l 11;1 mIl"1 ~. '. '. f." ~l HI :.. 'i r---w~:~ I ~ t. .~ = _ 'I [j) - > I IJ if t, ~i If -I ! "1. " ,ft Jl , H ~ ;"~~' ~~~ ;~~. ~ . ... ~li , 1 ~ , :l~ I. , '. L " .~ , ~ ~ 1 \ . i~li 'ii ~ '<.~ i T ~~, ~3 il! p II'! ~'6Il" l!. I~::. 'G} II . c _ ~ ! .. -, I i; I I m, I II I~lllll! I'.. I ~ t1m - I ! i!U r <f f . ~I \jl~ ~ie. JJ i.! . I . !! t l '. . '+- -Utm"... -rrm";i;!1 1 PI! \ I I 'fq J hI " ~ I ' , . 1 .i ~l -0 :I:~ . 0 CD ; ., 3 n "C CD c ::+0 jT OJc ~ -or . I '. ~:il WI iiil!iirl!ili WI! HII'.I. !!lil -^!!!iI'!!1!'l'11111.,!I!: III 1\ j ! I ! "Ii (fj "I! ~: "I I to; ", I', h~.!-- .C:.' \ f hO , '" .0 r ::; ~ F " III 1 z ~ h1 ., ....... "", r-'" .. r.~ .. ~1Il ~~ ..' ;AI ~ 1 '" ""' ill III ., ilwqnil i liI:!l!!.!' !. 11ill!!!!ll, 9 li'j!li11 ! h,!il d ~ l,ni:a! ~on' "I , _,. , '''" o~on 9""''' .~::! o ~z z, 0:" '" ., 2~ r""' ~O "Z ~I " on ~ ,-i .c :" l ,., , gee !ill!1 i1h t il!~ I 1_ @1i!J<!-l I~ P' !i P !~ I ; II !" I . ! ~ 'I'. a 11'1 Iii' (f[) r-l T N' e ~ I N ;; ~ , . . ...". ' .:" . . ',' ......;. - '. . (\ .~. .~ ~r .. ~f '~/ ! .~ it I J ~!81 ElU ,0 is Z ~ it z ?"o f.\ ~ () ~ [1 ~ AI J ~! l ~ I! ~n " 111 ~li*lt,"t . tl /,J. J ~l '~i !i . ~ . " t ~ 1 JJf v ill 1~ if ~g '. ~ iI , . " - ~!81 '1.""*'." ill' "1] -< X-l I U:11l111!!/!li!!1li!lIII!iill!ili i ~. '" 'II I I ;I)J ,~ w'r' . g~ iI' c.". I~! 3 I ~ rlili ~ -illl!:.!!'i!'I!'ll.;!l! II 't II . . oj I < "D.. IHI p ::;n ^ .\. . II! I 1,11 ..c .; I. I , II -or W ~i it S I , I' i 'I '. . I ~ ~ I III J;;! illl W I - @ '\; ,,1'1 I ~ 8 ~! ~ '\;' ..!l <!, 'I ~: , m Z 'lrl --.- ~\f' \ ' "y ); - , r !!I~!ii r f~ d;; !i:,w~mf!i1!1l1!1111!1i!i~lilir~ ($ ~.~ ,-,8 ^ 'i hi" '''II · II" 'Ii 'I~ ~!it~ en !. - !! Pi, ] : ~"'..'" "',. (I - I i i ! il!: 11 I ! ! i q:: nr ; i I I '111 1 , , ., 11l1U' I r! H Pill!' 'I! 1'1 ~~: E I'll!" ill' PI'1 n .. II II! !!" I! ~ 'f ~.. ! ill! ' . ! ! ' 'II "1, !. Ii! ' . . ~ ~.~ i ! ! II . " t ! ,. ! ~; I I 'I ! ! ! ! , , i I ~ . , Ii , ! ! i , I lj liS 'ill!' 1--' !b,! 'l",! ~; h ~ i I" ;-."1l!li'iil 'I. '! . 'I! l '.'.' 'lei ek a tl 'I' " ; ," ~~ " I , ! I' ! ! I il! ;X II I i i I qp~ , n lllilU' I! ~" t" 1"1 '. lii!1i' II ~~ ~. n 'Iii ,. '!j! !! I' , i ~~ n ! ' i! "II , , I! Ii ! ' ., , ! .! ! , I. i I ;! , ! n ! i 'I i . , , I: 1 ' ,Pi- , 1. I:i! ill 1> Pi! I ! %1;1 Pi>' I II . ~ ~a ,~ Fill ii ~-~ I 6) 1111.1. ill II'; !ill !i~ Ii' Il!!i' liiI/ Ie: I 11 :, il!,!; I, ,!lp" .ll~ I!! . 'I i I I p. . i ~ i i I i ~ rot ~ 3 ;; ~ i1 ~ " ll> ~. ffi' '" 1r :J !!!. ~ ;:: , (1) . c. ~ _. :r g ~ ~ "' :J ~. CD Iii ~ (f) o c: - g. I ~ ~ - ~ ~ (fj^. < . ~. ., ~. o ~ tf vtf ;;! rot ~ 3 o_ m ;; ~ .- :J - i1 e: "- .;;> " or () 3 :D 0 .. (1) ,- '" en 1'r (1) :J C: !!!. u c ;:: ~ ~. (1) '" . C. :J" ~ o. " :r !!!. ll> . :J !!. () 0 " (1) u "' :J '< . - " (1) CD ~. ~ 3 0 < (1) S . \ (f) 0 I' e: g. I I :;; (1) (Jj , ~ ~ < ~ or :;; f ;;! ,,; ~ ~ ;; ~ i1 ~ . ll> ~ ffi' '" 1r ~ ~ ;:: . ~ ~ 0' ~ ~ !!. () " (1) rc :J " CD !:r ..., . I (Jj I o en U [ '" E c;: 5' '" ~<>- m ~._ CD . < 30- Q) ~ g: ~,- ~ m !it m " ~ 0' ~ .1 i .J Q l ~ a " o Q ~ ~ !;;:- ~ f ~ a ~ ~ ;; ;JI a Q Q w =1 .. " . 3 . a =1 .. ~ o Q, z o " ". m " ~ 1r ~ Il' ;; Q" ~ ~ ;; "' a " o Q ~ !r . Q ~ ~ ;; "' a Q Q Il' .. , ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ o. a " o Q w =1 .- " . 3 . a =1 .- ~ o Q, ;;! rot !r 3 . ~ 3 Q" (1) ~ ;; " !I " e: . "- or " :D ,'\ "' " a . (1) ,r\ " '" 0 0' Q :J ~ !!!. " c ;:: , ~ (1) ~ . c. ~ ~ " ,. \ Q :r !r ~ . () ~ !!. . ;; " (1) Q "' :J "' . ~ ~ " ~ a ~" ;; Q ;JI Q a w " I 0 ~ Q !r ~ . Q" m ~ J~ 1~ ~ ~ . -. ;; Q " " ": 1;.' ~ ~ ;; ~I , . t ~ .~ Q w "' 5 . ~ ~ ~ . , it Q ~ "' ~ , . ;; "' a =1 .- ~ . f " . 3 . 3 =1 .- ~ ~ , .. ~ ~ [ I (Jj I o en '9, ![ '" E c;: 5' '" ~,,- m 1"- ~ 3 ~- Q) g. ::!'. - 0 ~,- ~ " . 3 . a =1 .- ~ o Q, :;; " !<l m " < ~ o. ~ \"" ;;! rot ~ 3 -".J ..,. c CD ,,"'! l' " &' e: " 1" ;;; . -~ :I [ ":J , :D .~ . . '" 10 , 6' "','. , :J ~ I ~ ;;:: J-_ I " '" . Co " ~ " ;; ~ i' g () .. ,- re :J , . :. ~ CD , ~ ~ " ,I" '"i'" '.'~ '.;~:fi,f> ,;~ '.l~PJ~ ~. '. i ii_ " . '" !;, . c;: I J 5' ~ 10 - OJ i < iii' ~ :;; rn r rot ~ 3 c. T ~ ~ ' ,. ~ e: ,~J ;;; , ';::", ~ :D ~ (I) 10 1r :J !','; !!!. c s: ':.,.. S .. C- o 15' "- ~ !!!. . () , (I) re :J ~ - '" ~ Ii -i (/)1 . '" !;, c;: 5' '" < iii' :;; rn '- ,.'. " -, '\ " ~, ' >'1/:" '.'t~ . 0':-, 4 - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 .. ,. " &' c: " iij' 0 :D 3 . (1) to 5' :J !!!. c: s: . .' CD . C. j;, ~ i . () !J (1) "' :J . co " 2 ~ . Cl E " c: I ! 5' to < (/) ~ iii' ~ :;; rn f rot 3 !r (1) " " m ~' i1 c: " or < ~ [ . ~ :D '" 0 ;; .:g ~ "' 5' a " ~ !!!. c s: Q , , (1) . c. ~ 15' :r !!!. i () !r (1) ~ :J ~ ~ ~ ~ ;; ~ a ~ ro I (Jj ;:: (1) c. ~ o '" 15' CD '" !;, c;: 5' '" ';;0_ m ._ ro L < h- !!i 0' ~,- ~ '" o S ". m ~ a, o ~ ~ !<l m " OJ a, o ~ ~ r "U :J" ll> en CD - ;;! rot z !;\' ~ 0 3 g !<l '" " " m m i1 c: " " or < < . ~ i a, :D 0 0' CD ~ ~ '" 5' \, :J !!!. c ;:: , ~ CD C. ~ 15' :r !!!. m () ~ CD "' :J ~, ~ ~ " . "U :J" ll> en (1) '" ;:: CD C. ~ 0 3; " CD '" s, c;: 5' '" ~ rn ;;0- m 0 I (D !<l ~ r := ~ m " m (Jj OJ " 5' < ~ ,- a . :J 0 a, en ~ 0 ~ ~ rot ~ 3 ;; ~ Q ~ ~ D> 3 :D . (1) '" 5' :J !!!. c ;:: ~ (1) ~ 9. :r 2 . - ~ 0 9 '" rc :J s CD Iii ~ () ll> :J " CD ~ () (1) :J CD ~ ;;0- m I .- (D -' < ^ .'- ~ (fj ~ ,- ~ :E !!l g> c 5' I!J " < ~ g I!J ~ ~ cr ~ g> [I, g ~ o " lJ 5 ii> . ~ i ~ ~' !l' ! ~, ~ " [ , . . ~ a -ID Q ~ Q' ro ~ !r . , ~ .. i "' a Q Q' =1 .- " ~ ~ . . =1 .- ~ =1 .. 2' ~ ~ . . =1 .- " ~ :!! S (1) '" en () '" :> co ~ ~ ~ .. i "' " ~ Q ro !r ~ " I'< . ;JI a ~ m ~ !!; 6' :J en z o g I!J", "0 Dic 6'S ~m "''' -,< 3" =C". ,,0 ~~ II ""...- '....~' .... ""r, '..=.:.L.::.:..:..::;:;;:.::..l'....,.,-- , '-----c---'i j' I I I I II I Iii '~I ",', ',"TI ,,~ ~ ~rlll !, ',' 'I:: ' ,,", i' Ir'i"'~ ' r 'Ii I ----'-- , I' !:: 'I DO,,",~YNOAA ' I,' ". I f li!2 I :: ~ i ___ " Ii:; I, - i1 ~': ~ :~ , :, I:! I " :: '''I' H ,r': r: "I' ,t I ~ i ,: i! f'I' " ." I'" , " 1;.,?,€ . i:!;,: ~t;~ .... -, f;;;J j,<;~ ~~~ I I I , I ~ 11111111 II ~ i~: ~ r;' "+1'11: 0" '0 1 "1'1' 1'1 m l!i l ~l I I I ~ IIH'I'lllllllIPIllll ~l 11,'111 n I"!.l ,00 , I '" , ", .. \LI"I' 1- "-'_'~ I "..----- '" -4--1 , , II [' I 1 , H .' I ~: I , , --3$1 ", '" $ 'I; ..-..-, I II lit IiI ~: I I I I Ii ---- ~! i~ r II : rr ~a ~ II I" .~ 'i 'j ~I i ~ I ' I,:, " " i!,,: ~t I i " ~ F i ~ ~. ~! ~ X;;l gEl "g,tI> lit" -g. III:,' 11'1 rl~ Ii!! HI! !I, a ill~, jli!r - II '!~.l !.rl' l,~ 1,.\ !I! ~ I!' I' !III '1'1 q ~J ~ . ~~ ~ . ~ RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080~07 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07- 0201, PA07 -0202) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Procedural Findinqs, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc, ("UHS"), filed Planning Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (the "Project"), The Project contemplates a maximum building height of 115 feet, a 408,160 square foot, 320-bed hospital, a helipad, two medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center all totaling 566,160 square feet and a parcel map, B, The Planning Commission initially considered the Project on April 6, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify regarding this matter. C, The Planning Commission, based in part on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. D, On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. E, Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the Authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project, F, A Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report ("Draft EIR") was issued on August 3, 2005, inviting comments from responsible agencies, other regulatory agencies, organizations and individuals pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15082, G, Written statements were received by the City in response to the Notice of Preparation, which assisted the City in narrowing the issues and alternatives for analysis in the Draft EIR, H, The Draft EIR was prepared by the City pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines section 15168 to analyze potential adverse environmental impacts of the Project implementation pursuant to CEQA. I. On September 26, 2005 the State Office of Planning and Research approved a 30-day public review period for the Temecula Regional Hospital EIR (SCH#2005030017) for this Project determining that such a review period is consistent with the criteria set forth in the written guidelines of the Office of Planning and Research for shortened reviews, and Section 21091 of the Public Resources Code, J, Therefore, upon completion of the Draft EIR dated September 26, 2005, the City initiated a 30-day public comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research on September 26, 2005, K, The City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft EIR in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, Copies of the Draft EIR were sent to public agencies, organizations, and individuals, In addition, the City placed copies of the Draft EIR at the City's library and made copies available for review at City offices, L, Before, during and after the official public review period for the Draft EIR, the City received eighteen (18) written comments, all of which were responded to by the City, Those comments and the responses are included as part of the Final Environmental Impact Report/Response to Comments document (Final EIR), M, Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092,5, the City provided its responses to all comments on and before November 22, 2005, including those received after the end of the public review period, Responses to public agency commentators were provided on or before November 12, 2005, N, On April 6, 2005, April 20, 2005, November 16, 2005, and January 5, 2006 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held duly noticed public hearings on the Project and the Draft EIR at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Project and the Draft EIR, 0, On January 24, 2006, the City Council of the City of Temecula held duly noticed public hearings on the Project and the Draft EIR at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Project and the Draft EIR, p, On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of proceedings, including testimony received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35,31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959- 080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )," Q, Two lawsuits were timely filed seeking to set aside the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the Project by the City Council of the City of Temecula, The lawsuit filed by Petitioners California Nurses Association (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445394) was filed on February 24, 2006, The second suit, by Petitioners Citizens Against Noise and Traffic (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445411), was filed on February 24, 2006, R, On April 6, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court (hereafter, the "Court") ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, and its certification of the Final EIR, In its Order, the Court concluded that the EIR failed to adequately address construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts and mitigation measures for traffic impacts, and did not address potential impacts from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plumes potentially generated by three gas stations in the vicinity that might have the potential to migrate under the site, contaminate the soil on the site and generate unhealthful gas vapors, S, The Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency, All other aspects of the Final EIR were unchallenged during the challenge period, and thus are presumed to be adequate along with those aspects specifically upheld by the Court, T, The City Council of the City of Temecula, on May 22, 2007 directed the City Attorney not to appeal the Court's decision, Staff thereafter commenced preparation of the additional environmental documentation as required by the Court's order so that the Project could be reconsidered by the Planning Commission and City Council in conjunction with the additional environmental documentation required by the Court's order. U, UHS and the City sought clarification of the Court's judgment and writ of mandate in the matter, and on August 22, 2007, the Court issued an order stating that its order "only includes those mandates which are necessary to achieve compliance with CEQA," The Court clarified that to comply with the order, the City need complete further and sufficient CEQA analysis in only the areas of: b 1) analysis of MTBE Plume, 2) siren noise, 3) construction noise, 4) direct traffic impacts, and 5) cumulative traffic impacts, As such, the other aspects of the Final EIR are deemed sufficient and additional analysis of other topical areas is not required pursuant to the Court's order. V, Thereafter, the City prepared a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) to address the issues identified in the Court's order. W, A Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the Draft SEIR was issued on July 6, 2007 and requested those agencies with regulatory authority over any aspect of the project to describe that authority and to identify additional relevant environmental issues that should be addressed in the Draft SEIR, Six entities submitted comments in response to the NOP, X, On July 12, 2007, a scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Draft SEI R for the Project. y, On or about November 5, 2007 the State Office of Planning and Research approved a 30-day public review period for the Temecula Regional Hospital Draft SEIR determining that such a review period is consistent with the criteria set forth in the written guidelines of the Office of Planning and Research for shortened reviews, and Section 21091 of the Public Resources Code, Z, Therefore, upon completion of the Draft SEIR dated November 5, 2007, the City initiated a 30-day public comment period and circulated the Draft SEIR for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007, The City received three comment letters consisting of a substantive comment from the State of California Department of Toxic Substances Control, a letter from the Governor's Office of Planning and Research summarizing the review process from the State's perspective, and a letter from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District stating that the District had no comments, Reponses to each of the comment letters were prepared, and none of the comments raised any issues that would require recirculation of the Draft SEIR, AA, Thereafter, a Final SEIR consisting of the Draft SEIR, the technical appendices, comments on the Draft SEIR and the responses to those comments, was compiled, BB, Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving the Project, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the Final SEIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: 1, Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or, 2, Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding, Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3, Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR, CC, Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that if the Project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the Project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, DO, Environmental impacts identified in the Final SEIR that are found to be less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section III of Exhibit A of this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference, EE, Environmental impacts identified in the SEIR as potentially significant but which cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures are described in Section IV of Exhibit A of this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference, FF, Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section V of Exhibit A of this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference, GG, A discussion of the Project benefits identified by City staff and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Exhibit B of this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference, Public Resources Code section 21081,6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to assure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures, The required mitigation monitoring and reporting program is attached hereto as Exhibit C, and is hereby incorporated by reference, HH, On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Numbers PA07 -0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07 -0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan) and PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080- 007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. II. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, including the Final SEIR and the portions of the Final EIR not invalidated by the Court, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final SEIR for the Project, make the findings required by CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. JJ, On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Final SEIR for the Temecula regional Hospital Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. KK, Prior to taking action, the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, and all oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings, Section 2, Rescission of Prior Approval and Certification of Final EIR, The City Council hereby rescinds its approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital as ordered by the Superior Court of California for the County of Riverside, thus rendering its prior adoption of Resolution Numbers 06-06, 06-07 and 06-08 null and void and of no further effect whatsoever. The City Council further hereby rescinds its certification of the Final EIR prepared for the Temecula Regional Hospital to the extent that the Final EIR was deemed invalid by the Court, leaving in tact those aspects of the prior certification that were not challenged in the lawsuits or were deemed adequate by the Court, Section 3, Certification of the Final SEIR, The City Council hereby certifies the Final SEIR, adopts the Findings and Facts in Support of Findings as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto, adopts a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project on a site located on the north side Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, generally known as Assessor Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080- 010, as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto, and adopts a Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto which Exhibits are incorporated herein as though set forth in full.) Section 4, Further Findinqs, The City Council certifies that the Final SEIR was completed in compliance with CEQA. The City Council also finds that the Final SEIR was presented to the decisionmaking body of the City, and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final SEIR, along with all portions of the Final EIR that were not invalidated by the Court's orders, prior to making any decision on the Project, Further, the City Council finds that the Final SEIR in conjunction with those sections of the Final EIR not invalidated by the Court, reflects the City's independent and analysis, Section 5, Custodian of Records, The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, California 92590, Section 6, Severabilitv, The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution, Section 7, Certification, The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January 2008, Michael S, Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W, Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No, 08-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS Susan Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A Findings and Facts in Support of Findings I. Introduction. The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines (the "Guidelines") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified which identifies one or more significant effects on the environment that will occur if a project is approved or carried out unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the EIR, B, Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding, Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency, C, Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR,1 Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Temecula Regional Hospital Project and related actions (the "Project"), as more fully described in the EIR, These findings are based upon evidence presented in the record of these proceedings, both written and oral, the Supplemental EIR and all of its contents, the Comments and Responses to Comments on the Supplemental EIR, and staff and consultants' reports presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council. II. Proiect Obiectives. As set forth in the Supplemental EIR, objectives that the City of Temecula and the Project Applicant seek to achieve with this Project (the "Project Objectives") are as follows: City's Objectives: A. Provide for superior, easily accessible emergency medical services within the City ofTemecula, 1 Ca!. Pub, Res, Code S 21081; 14 Ca!. Code Regs, S 15091. B, Provide for a regional hospital campus including a hospital facility, medial offices, cancer center and fitness rehabilitation center designed to be an operationally efficient state-of-the-art facility, C, Encourage future development of a regional hospital and related services, 0, Support development of biomedical, research, and office facilities to diversify Temecula's employment base, E, Ensure the compatibility of development on the subject site with surrounding uses in terms of the size and configuration of buildings, use of materials and landscaping, the location of access routes, noise impacts, traffic impacts, and other environmental conditions, F, Incorporate buffers that minimize the impacts of nose, light, visibility of activity, and vehicular traffic on surrounding residential uses, Applicant Objectives: A. Provide high-quality health services to the residents of Temecula and surrounding communities, B, Provide a regional hospital facility that includes standard hospital services, with outpatient care, rehabilitation, and medical offices, C, Provide a regional hospital facility designed to be an operationally efficient, state-of-the-art facility that meets the needs of the region and hospital directors, 0, Provide medical offices, a cancer center and fitness rehabilitation center adjacent to the hospital facility to meet the needs of doctors and patients who need ready access to the hospital for medical procedures, III. Effects Determined to be Less Than Sianificant With Mitiaation in the Supplemental EIR. The Supplemental EIR found that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact without the imposition of mitigation with respect to the alleged methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plume, A less than significant environmental impact determination was made for the MTBE plume based on the more expansive discussion in the Supplemental EIR, A. Hazards a, MTBE Plume The Supplemental EIR examines the potential risk arising from plumes of MTBE in groundwater caused by leaking underground storage tanks at three nearby service stations, Although the groundwater would not be used for drinking, a potential risk to workers and visitors arises from potential toxic vapors that might migrate upward if the MTBE plume migrated under the proposed hospital site, 1, Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect as identified in the Supplemental EI R, Specifically the following mitigation measures have been imposed upon the Project, to mitigate any potential impacts to less than significant levels, Mitigation Measure 3.1-1: Petroleum affected soils at the proposed hospital site if any, (e,g" where stained or odiferous soils are encountered) shall be segregated, stockpiled on-site, and sampled prior to disposal at an appropriate facility, as required by the respective disposal facility, All contaminated soils shall be disposed of off-site in accordance with applicable local, state, and federal laws regulating the transport and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous materials, These materials shall be transported to a permitted disposal facility by a licensed waste hauler. Mitigation Measure 3.1-2: Prior to issuance of any encroachment permit for the Project, a detailed soil, groundwater, and soil vapor sampling program shall be conducted for the proposed hospital site, Any identified MTBE or other VOC impacted soil shall be removed, handled, and properly disposed of by appropriately licensed and qualified individuals in accordance with applicable regulations during demolition of structures, The Project applicant shall provide documentation (for example, all required waste manifests, sampling, and soil monitoring text results) to the City of Temecula showing that abatement of any MTBE or other VOC containing soil identified in the Project site has been completed in full compliance with all applicable regulations and approved by the appropriate regulatory agency(ies), 2, Facts in Support of Findings No detectable concentrations of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) or MTBE were found in vapor beneath the proposed hospital site buildings, and thus there is a less than significant risk of exposure resulting from soil vapor migration and flux, and a less than significant related human health risk, MTBE bearing groundwater may have migrated onto the proposed hospital site along the southern boundary, Nevertheless, there is a less than significant related human health risk due to the possible presence of MTBE bearing groundwater beneath the proposed hospital site, The Project site is located within 1,000 feet of three former gasoline stations, These gasoline stations experienced leaking underground storage tanks (UST), Groundwater monitoring has occurred regularly since 2001 in response to the leaking USTs, Chevron Station No, 204029 is located approximately 200 feet southeast of the Project site and has six groundwater monitoring wells, Monitoring and remediation of the Chevron site is under the active jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, The maximum concentration of MTBE reported at the site was a concentration of 1,400 micrograms per liter, and the maximum concentration of tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) reported was 420 micrograms per liter. On January 24, 2007, groundwater was sampled at the Chevron site, The reported concentrations of MTBE at two well locations were 11 micrograms per liter at a well 300 feet southeast of the Project site, and 4 micrograms per liter at a well 255 feet southeast of the Project site, No other Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were detectable at this facility, Based on the Project site's gradient, the direction of groundwater flows, and the low levels of MTBE detected, the likelihood that MTBE from the Chevron facility has migrated onto the Project site is very low, This opinion was corroborated by groundwater sampling conducted at the Project site in 2006, which did not detect MTBE in groundwater samples downgradient from the Chevron release, Further, the October 2005 Holguin Fahan & Associates report concluded that "MTBE concentrations are consistent with the historic levels and show a general overall concentration downward trend," Thus the concentrations identified above are likely to continue to decrease due to the ongoing remediation activities at the Chevron site, Based on the reported gradient and the proposed Project's proximity to the Chevron release, it is possible that MTBE impacted groundwater has migrated onto the Project site, however, MTBE was not detected in any current groundwater samples collected from borings at the Project. A Shell station is located approximately 840 feet east / southeast of the Project site, In September 2001, five groundwater monitoring wells were installed at the facility to investigate possible impacts to soil and groundwater by on-site USTs, Monitoring and remediation of the Shell site is under the active jurisdiction and oversight of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, In response to detection of MTBE in 2001 and subsequent assessments, 32 groundwater monitoring wells at downgradient locations and a thirty-five cone penetration test location were installed, Quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling has been conducted at the facility since 2001, Remedial action was taken in the form of groundwater extractions between May 2002 and June 2003, resulting in the extraction of a reported 1,6 million gallons of groundwater. Between May 2003 and November 2004, three groundwater extraction wells and two groundwater injection wells were installed west of the facility as a groundwater remediation system to minimize contaminant migration and to capture and treat petroleum hydrocarbons migrating in the groundwater from the facility, The groundwater remediation was in use at the facility from July 2004 to August 2006, at which time the system was taken off-line due to the reduction of MTBE in the Shell station's groundwater monitoring wells network, No evidence has suggested that there is any "rebound" in contamination levels, Nonetheless, based on reported groundwater gradient in the shallow groundwater regime and groundwater sample analytical results, MTBE impacted groundwater has the potential to be migrating onto the Project site at very low concentrations even though MTBE was not detected in any groundwater samples collected from borings on the hospital site that are downgradient from the Shell release, An Arco service station (No, 5695) is located approximately 240 feet east of the proposed hospital site, Monitoring and remediation of the Arco site is under the active jurisdiction and oversight of the San Diego Water Quality Control Board, In 2002 a remediation system consisting of groundwater extraction pumps was installed, In June 2003 three groundwater injection wells were installed along Dartola Road, which abuts the eastern edge of the Project site, Since the third quarter of 2003 groundwater pumped from the proposed hospital site remediation system has been treated and then reinjected using the three groundwater injection wells, These activities minimized contaminant migration onto the Project site, Nonetheless, reported groundwater flow direction and groundwater sample analytical results suggest that MTBE impacted groundwater is likely to be migrating towards the proposed hospital site as a result of the Arco release, However, MTBE was not detected in any groundwater samples collected from soil borings B10 at the Project site, which is downgradient from the Arco release, In January 2006, a soil vapor survey was preformed in order to assess the possible presence and concentration BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes) and MTBE in the subsurface soil vapor in the vicinity of the footprint of the proposed buildings at the proposed hospital site, Soil vapor samples were collected from seven locations within the footprint of the proposed buildings, Three additional sampling locations were located in the southwest portion of the proposed hospital site in an attempt to intercept any off-site MTBE groundwater plume that may have been intruding onto the Project site, The samples collected reported no detectable concentrations of BTEX or MTBE above laboratory detection limits, In July 2006, ten groundwater sampling locations were bored in the vicinity of the Project site and in places most likely to intercept migrating MTBE contaminated water. Samples were taken and analyzed in accordance with U,S, Environmental Protection Agency Method 8260B, MTBE was detected in groundwater at boring B5 at a concentration of 1 ,3 migrograms per liter, which was the only boring to have any detectable vac concentration, In July 2007 SCS Engineers assessed the Project site to evaluate shallow subsurface soil vapor. SCS Engineers conducted a soil vapor survey on July 16 and 18, 2007, Soil vapor samples were collected from 14 locations within the proposed Project site, Additional soil vapor samples were taken on August 21 and 24, 2007, The soil vapor samples were collected in accordance with California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC) guidelines, As set forth in the Supplemental EIR, No MTBE or any other analytes were detected at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limits, The SEIR analyzes the potential health risk associated with potential groundwater and soil vapor issues, Various scenarios were studied using the DTSC Screening-level Model for Groundwater Contamination, Conservative assumptions were used, such as the unrealistic but conservative assumption that MTBE concentrations in groundwater would uniform across the proposed hospital site, Assuming that the highest reported concentration of MTBE of 97 micrograms per liter from 2006 (which was measured to be reduced to 55 migrograms per liter in that sample from April 2007), and conservative exposure assumptions, the DTSC model indicated a less than significant cancer risk of almost one order of magnitude below the typical risk threshold, The risk of non-cancer health effects is also less than significant. Other scenarios considered 1,3 micrograms per liter as the highest concentration potentially migrating from the east, which concludes even lower levels of risk under the DTSC model. Based on the information set forth in the SEIR and the various technical sampling, analysis and modeling, the City Council finds that even assuming unrealistic worst case contamination from sampling, health risks are less than significant. Further, concentrations levels are likely to continue to decline and become even less significant due to the ongoing remediation efforts at each of the three service stations, which are being overseen by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Nonetheless, in an abundance of caution, the foregoing mitigation measures are proposed to further ensure that no significant impacts will result from the construction or operation of the Project, Notwithstanding this less than significant hazardous impact, Mitigation Measures 3,1-1 and 3,1-2 will be implemented by the project applicant to ensure the impact remains less than significant, Thus, if MTBE or VOCs are detected in groundwater and vapor beneath the proposed hospital site buildings during construction, any contaminated soils shall be handled and disposed of in compliance with any local, State, and Federal regulations, Further, if any such contaminated soils and or MTBE/VOC impacted soil is discovered during construction or prior to construction, applicable mitigation will be implemented to address each discovery and reduce any health risks to acceptable levels, With the implementation of applicable mitigation measures, the impact will continue to be less than significant. IV, Environmental Effects that Remain Sianificant and Unavoidable After Mitiaation In the areas of noise and traffic, there are instances where environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable after mitigation, These areas are discussed below, A. Noise, The proposed Project would result in significant unavoidable noise impacts for: a, Construction Noise 1, Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Supplemental EIR, Mitigation includes: Mitigation Measure 3.2-1: The following measures shall be considered in the Project's design in order to mitigate the significant impacts: i. Mechanical ventilation will be required for hospital facility buildings since the interior standard of 50 dB(A) is to be met with windows and doors closed, ii. Demolition and construction activities shall be limited to the hours and days permitted by the City of Temecula Municipal Code, iii. All construction and demolition equipment shall be fitted with properly sized mufflers, iv, Noisy construction equipment items shall be located as far as practicable from the surrounding residential properties, v, The Project proponent will hire a noise monitor to accept complaints and confirm compliance with above-mentioned mitigation measures, Mitigation Measure 3.2-1 (a): The following measures shall be required by the contractor of the Project in order to mitigate the significant impacts: vi. Noisy construction equipment items shall be located as far as practicable from the surrounding residential properties, vii. In order to minimize the time during which any single noise- sensitive receptor is exposed to construction noise, construction shall be completed as rapidly as possible, viii. The quietest construction equipment owned by the contractor shall be used, The use of electric powered equipment is typically quieter than diesel, and hydraulic powered equipment is quieter than pneumatic power. If compressors powered by diesel or gasoline engines are to be used, they shall be contained or have baffles to help abate noise levels, ix, All construction equipment shall be properly maintained, Poor maintenance of equipment typically causes excessive noise levels, x, Noisy equipment shall be operated only when necessary, and shall be switched off when not in use, xi. Storage areas shall be located away from sensitive receptors, Where this is not possible, the storage of waste materials, earth, and other supplies shall be positioned in a manner that will function as a noise barrier to the closest sensitive receivers, xii. Public notice shall be given prior to construction identifying the location and dates of construction, the name and phone number of the contractor's contact person in case of complaints, and the name and phone number of a contact person at the City of Temecula in case of complaints, The public notice shall encourage the residents to call the contractor's contact person and/or the City's contact person rather than the police in case of complaint, Residents shall also be kept informed of any changes to the schedule, The contractor's designated contact person shall be on site throughout project construction with a mobile phone, If a complaint is received, the contractor's contact person and/or the City's contact person shall take whatever reasonable steps are necessary to resolve the complaint. If possible, a member of the contractor's team shall also travel to the complainant's location to understand the nature of the disturbance, 2, Facts in Support of Findings Construction activity noise levels at and near the construction areas would fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of use of various pieces of construction equipment. Construction-related material haul trips would raise ambient noise levels along haul routes, depending on the number of haul trips made and types of vehicles used, In addition, certain types of construction equipment generate impulsive noises (such as pile driving), which can be particularly annoying, Noise generated by construction activities would result in a substantial increase in noise at the nearest residences and would be significant without mitigation, The City's ordinance limiting the hours of construction provides no mitigation of construction noise during weekdays and Saturdays and is relevant only to protect nearby residents from construction noise during the nighttime hours, Sundays and holidays, In the nearest residences to the northwest of the project site and in some of the residences to the south, construction activities are expected to exceed the accepted ambient noise level of 65 dB by more than 3 dB, This would be a short-term significant impact on residents adjacent to the Project site, With implementation of the mitigation measure, the construction noise levels would be reduced, but even with this mitigation measure the noise impact would be significant and unavoidable for the nearest homes to the northwest and south, which are as close as 305 feet from the proposed Project site, b, Siren Noise 1, Findings Specific economic, social, legal, technological, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the EIR, Specifically, noise standards that can be enforced through a mitigation measure do not apply in emergency situations and the social utility of loud sirens to make way for emergency vehicles leads to the conclusion that no mitigation measures are feasible, 2, Facts in Support of Findings Traffic noise impacts generated by the proposed Project would be less than significant. When ambulance siren noise is added to the equation, traffic noise generated by the proposed Project would be considered a significant impact. Ambulance siren noise would increase CNEL by more than 3 dB, Also, residents along emergency routes would be exposed to unmitigated maximum noise levels of about 94 to 117,5 dB(A) from ambulance sirens, However, the City does not regulate noise from ambulance sirens, Noise standards do not apply in emergency situations and sirens are needed in order to increase speed and efficiency in transporting those in some need of medical treatment to hospitals so as to increase the possibility of effective treatment. Thus, although the noise from ambulance sirens would be significant, the need for loud sirens to improve emergency transportation efficiency leads to the conclusion that no mitigation measures can or should be placed on this type of noise, B, Traffic Impacts Based on the established significance criteria, the following significant impacts were calculated: a, Direct Project Impacts Impact 3,3-1: Segment of Highway 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road, This is a direct impact because with the addition of Project Phase II traffic this segment deteriorates from LOS D to LOS E, Impact 3,3-2: Highway 79 / Country Glen Way (Project driveway), This is a direct impact since this intersection is the main Project driveway and the Project is responsible for providing the north leg of this intersection, which does not exist currently and will serve as the Project access, 1, Findings i. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Supplemental EIR, Specifically, as more fully discussed in the Supplemental EIR, there are a number of planned infrastructure improvements under way which will be partially funded by the Project applicant through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), City of Temecula Development Impact Fee (DIF), the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program, and the Project's location in an assessment district and/or Community Facilities District. To the extent that the improvements have not been completed by others, the hospital must complete those improvements before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy as provided for in the various mitigation measures, The following mitigation measures address the Project's direct impacts: Mitigation Measure 3.3-1: Traffic Signal Coordination - SR 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road City of Temecula CIP entitled "SR 79 South/Margarita Road Traffic Signal Coordination - Old Town Front Street to Butterfield Stage Road", The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula building permit. Should the entire CIP funding not be in place at the time of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase lA, the applicant shall fund the traffic signal coordination and establish a reimbursement agreement with the City of Temecula to be reimbursed for expenditures made on behalf of the City, However, at this time, the CIP calls for completion of the improvement in the Year 2008, In addition to Mitigation Measure 3.3-1, the Project proposes three access driveways, two on SR 79 and one on De Portola Road, The following improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA from the City of Temecula in order to mitigate impacts of the new access driveways, on existing transportation facilities: Mitigation Measure 3.3-2: i. Driveway #1 on SR 79: Driveway #1 on SR 79 is the fourth (north) leg of the SR 79/Country Glen Way, This intersection is currently a signalized T-intersection, Modification of the current signal has already been completed to accommodate the fourth leg serving the Project site and other related changes to geometry, The project shall provide the following additional intersection geometry: ii. A dedicated westbound right-turn lane on SR 79, iii. Dual eastbound left-turn lanes on SR 79, and dual left-turn lanes and a shared through/right-turn lane in the southbound direction exiting the Project site, iv, Driveway #2 on SR 79: Driveway #2 on SR 79 shall be located at the west boundary of the property and will provide unsignalized right in/right-out only access, This 40-foot wide driveway shall provide one inbound and one outbound lane, v, Driveway #3 on De Portola Road: Driveway #3 on De Portola Road will provide unsignalized right-in/right-out and left-in only access, Left-turns out of the hospital shall be prohibited, This 40-foot wide driveway shall provide one inbound and one outbound lane, vi. The hospital and other related buildings are located approximately in the center of the site, surrounded by parking, An adequate internal roadway system shall be provided to access each facility and to provide adequate parking, b, There are no feasible mitigation measures beyond 3,3-1 through 3,3-2 that would reduce the direct traffic impacts because no other Project specific improvements would address the primarily regional circulation improvements necessary to address impacts, many of which cannot be accommodated due to the fact that the area is nearly built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, as discussed more fully in the discussion of cumulative impacts below, 2, Facts in Support of Findings: As noted above, the Project is found to have direct significant impacts at two intersections with the construction of Phase 2 of the Project. Impact 3.3-1: Segment of Highway 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road (Phase 2 Specific), As indicated in the Supplemental EIR, the roadway segment of Highway 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road under existing conditions operates at LOS C with a v/c ratio of 0,724, On Project Opening Day Without the Project which consists of Existing Conditions plus a 3% ambient growth rate for three years, the LOS level will remain at C with a v/c ratio of 0,789, According to the significance thresholds articulated in the Supplemental EIR, a project impact is considered significant if there is an increase in the v/c ratio on a roadway segment greater than two percent. Further, the significant impact is considered direct if the Project causes a reduction in the LOS to below D, With the addition of phase two of the Project, this roadway segment goes from a v/c ratio of 0,789 on Opening Day to a v/c ratio of 0,906, an increase of well over 2 percent. Further, with this increase in v/c ratio, the roadway segment will operate at LOS E resulting in a direct project specific significant impact. With the addition of the cumulative impact noted below, this highway segment will be reduced even further to LOS F with a v/c ratio of 1,530, In an effort to reduce this impact, Mitigation Measure 3,3-1 has been required which will mandate traffic signal coordination efforts on Highway 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road, With the implementation of this measure, the impact will remain significant and unavoidable, Impact 3.3-2: Highway 79 I Country Glen Way (Project Driveway) (Phase 2 Specific), As indicated in the Supplemental EIR, the Highway 79, Country Glen Way intersection currently operates at LOS A in the AM, peak hour, and at LOS B during the P,M, peak hour with a 5,0 second per vehicle delay for the AM, peak hour and a 10,1 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, peak hour. This delay increases slightly at Project Opening Day Without the Project to a 5,2 second per vehicle delay in the A,M, peak hour and a 11,1 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, peak hour with the LOS levels remaining the same, As articulated in the Supplemental EIR, a significant impact will result for intersections if the increase in the delay caused by the Project at the intersection is greater than 2 seconds, and will be direct if the Project causes a reduction in LOS to below level D, With the addition of the Project the delay increases to 22,9 second per vehicle for the AM, peak hour and 34,1 seconds per vehicle for the P,M, peak hour with the LOS levels both at level C, Although this increase in delay does not constitute a significant impact, this impact is still considered to be a direct project impact because if not for the project the improvements required by Mitigation Measure 3,3-2 would not be required, b, Cumulative Impacts Impact 3,3-3: SR 79 11-15 SB Ramps Impact 3,3-4: SR 79 11-15 NB Ramps Impact 3,3-5: SR 79 I La Paz St Impact 3,3-6: SR 79 I Pechanga Pkwy Impact 3,3-7: SR 79 I Jedediah Smith Rd; SR 79 I Avenida De Missiones; SR 79 ICountry Glen Way; SR 79 I Redhawk Pkwy I Margarita Road Impact 3,3-8: SR 79 I Avenida De Missiones Impact 3,3-9: SR 79/ Country Glen Way Impact 3,3-10: SR 79 / Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Rd Impact 3,3-11: SR 79 West of 1-15 Impact 3,3-12: SR 79 between 1-15 and Pechanga Parkway Impact 3,3-13: SR 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road Impact 3,3-14: SR 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road Impact 3,3-15: Pechanga Parkway south of SR 79 Impact 3,3-16: Margarita Road from De Portola Road to Highway 79 Impact 3,3-17: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 1, Findings i. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Supplemental EIR, Specifically, as more fully discussed in the Supplemental EIR, there are a number of planned infrastructure improvements under way which will be partially funded by the Project applicant through the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), City of Temecula Development Impact Fee (DIF), the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program, and the Project's location in an assessment district and/or Community Facilities District, To the extent that the improvements have not been completed by others, the hospital must complete those improvements before the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy as provided for in the following mitigation measures: Mitigation Measure 3.3-3 SR 79 / 1-15 Southbound Ramps City of Temecula CIP project entitled "Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange" (Public Works Account No, 210,165,662) which will add lanes to the ramps at the interchange shall be substantially underway through the design review process prior to the City's issuance of any encroachment permit for the project, Note: Funding is secured through DIF fees, TUMF fees, CFDs, State and Federal matching funds and SB 621 funds and construction is expected in 2011 , Mitigation Measure 3.34: SR 79 / 1-15 Northbound Ramps City of Temecula CIP project entitled "Interstate 15/ State Route 79 South Interchange" (Public Works Account No, 210,165,662) which will add lanes to the ramps at the interchange shall be substantially underway through the design review process prior to the City's issuance of any encroachment permit for the Project. Note: Funding is secured through DIF fees, TUMF fees, CFDs, State and Federal matching funds and SB 621 funds, and construction is expected in 2011, Mitigation Measure 3.3-5: SR 79 / La Paz St City of Temecula CIP entitled "Route 79 South Widening - Interstate 15 to Pechanga Parkway", which will add a fourth through lane in each direction on SR 79 through La Paz Street shall be constructed prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the project. If not completed by others, the Applicant shall complete the improvements, subject to potential reimbursement from the City or other Projects, Note: Funding is secured through DIF fees and participation in the TUMF program, and construction is expected to occur in 2008, Mitigation Measure 3.3-6: Intersection of SR 79 / Pechanga Pkwy City of Temecula CIP entitled "State Route 79 South to Pechanga Parkway - Dual Right- Turn Lanes", which will add a second eastbound right-turn lane on SR 79 at Pechanga Parkway shall be constructed prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project. If not completed by others, the Applicant shall complete the improvements, subject to potential reimbursement from the City or other projects, Note: Funding is secured through DIF fees and participation in the TUMF program and SB 621 Funds, and construction is scheduled for 2008, Mitigation Measure 3.3-7: SR 79 / Jedediah Smith Rd; SR 79 / Avenida De Missiones; SR 79 / Country Glen Way; SR 79 / Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Road City of Temecula CIP entitled "SR 79 South / Margarita Road Traffic Signal Coordination - Old Town Front Street to Butterfield Stage Road" shall be completed prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, If not completed by others, the Applicant shall complete the improvements, subject to potential reimbursement from the City or other projects, This Project will improve the signal coordination along SR 79, including the SR 79 / Jedediah Smith Road, SR 79 / Avenida De Missiones and SR 79 / Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Road intersections, which will improve traffic flow through these intersections, In addition, the Project shall construct lane geometry improvements and modify the existing traffic signal at the main Project driveway, prior to Project operation, Note: Funding is secured through DIF fees, and construction is scheduled for 2008, Mitigation Measure 3.3-8: Pechanga Parkway South of SR 79 City of Temecula CIP for fiscal Years 2007-2011 entitled "Pechanga Parkway Improvements - Phase II" - Public Works Account No, 210,165,668, shall be completed prior to the City's issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project. If not completed by others, the Applicant shall complete the improvements, subject to potential reimbursement from the City or other projects, Note: This Project will add the third through lane on Pechanga Parkway in both directions, Funding is secured through DIF fees, CFD (Wolf Creek), Public Lands and Highway Program, Pechanga Tribe contributions and Rancho California Water District funding, and construction is scheduled between 2007 and 2011 , Mitigation Measure 3.3-9: Margarita Road from De Portola Road to Highway 79, Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right-of-way, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right-of-way for additional circulation system improvements along this segment. Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however, the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, Mitigation Measure 3.3-10: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79, The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit, Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the right-of- way along this segment. Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right-of-way for additional circulation system improvements, Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, 2, Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency that has adopted, or can and should adopt such changes, More specifically, Mitigation Measure 3,3-3 and Mitigation Measure 3,3-4 require coordination with Caltrans and are found potentially to be infeasible because ultimately they are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not within the City of Temecula, Although it is expected that these mitigations measures would be implemented by 2011, the City cannot guarantee that this will occur. 3, There are no feasible mitigation measures beyond 3,3-3 through 3,3-10 that would reduce the cumulative traffic impacts because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, b, Facts in Support of Findings As noted above, there will be significant cumulative impacts, The Eastern Bypass, which is discussed in detail in the SEIR, is expected to eliminate all significant project and cumulative impacts detailed below, with the exception of Impact 3,3-1, 3,3-13 and 3,3-14, However, because the timeframe for the construction of the Eastern Bypass is expected to be 2025, it was not considered in the analysis at this time because completion is expected too far in the future and thus is unduly speculative, As a result, all of the following impacts will be significant and unavoidable, Impact 3.3-3: SR 79/1-15 SB Ramps Under existing conditions, the SR 79/1-15 SB Ramp will operate at LOS C with a delay of 32,2 seconds per vehicle in the AM, peak hour, and LOS D with a delay of 37,5 seconds per vehicle in the P,M, Peak Hour. On Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level during the AM, peak hour decreases to D with a 40,6 second per vehicle delay and increases to E with a 56,9 second per vehicle delay during the P,M, peak hour. Because the P,M, intersection is already below D before the addition of the Project, and the increase in delay is greater than 2 seconds between existing conditions and Opening Day Without the Project, this impact is considered to be a cumulative impact without the Project. With the addition of the Project and other cumulative projects, the LOS levels decrease to level F for both the AM, and P,M, peak hour with a 121,9 second per vehicle delay in the AM, and a 224,3 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, With the implementation of mitigation measure 3,3-3 which will add lanes to the southbound ramp at the interchange and should be substantially underway through design review process prior to the City's issuance of any encroachment permit for the project, the LOS levels for both the A,M, and P,M, peak hour will remain the same, but the delay will be reduced, During the AM, peak hour period the delay will be reduced to 84,5 seconds per vehicle delay, and to 160,9 seconds per vehicle delay during the P,M, peak period, Because the ability to add lanes to the southbound ramp requires coordination with Caltrans, mitigation measure 3,3-3 is deemed infeasible because the responsibility for the southbound ramps is that of another agency and not the City of Temecula, Because the impact at the interchange cannot be mitigated with certainty, it is considered significant and unmitigable, Impact 3.34: SR 79/1-15 NB Ramps Under existing conditions, the SR 79/1-15 NB Ramp will operate at LOS B with a delay of 12,0 seconds per vehicle in the AM, peak hour, and LOS C with a delay of 34,0 seconds per vehicle in the P,M, Peak Hour. At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level for the AM, peak hour will remain the same, but will decrease to LOS E for the P,M, peak hour with a 14,6 second per vehicle delay in the AM, peak hour and 63,1 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, peak hour. Because the P,M, peak hour is already below D before the addition of the Project, and the increase in delay is greater than 2 seconds, this impact is considered to be a cumulative impact without the project, With the addition of the Project and cumulative projects, the LOS levels are reduced to LOS F with an 80,9 seconds per vehicle delay in the A,M, Peak hour and LOS F with 298,2 second delay per vehicle in the P ,M, peak hour. With the implementation of mitigation measure 3,3-4, which will add lanes to the northbound ramp at the interchange and should be substantially underway through design review process prior to the City's issuance of any encroachment permit for the project, the LOS levels for the A,M, hour will change to LOS Band for the P,M, peak hour to LOS E, The delay will also be reduced with the AM, peak hour at 19,0 seconds, and the P,M, peak hour at 70.4 seconds, Because the ability to add lanes to the northbound ramp requires coordination with Caltrans, mitigation measure 3,3-4 is deemed infeasible because the responsibility for the northbound ramps is that of another agency and not the City of Temecula, Because the impact at the interchange cannot be mitigated with certainty, it is considered significant and unmitigable, Impact 3.3-5: SR 79/ La Paz St The Highway 79 and La Paz Street intersection currently operates at LOS B during the AM, peak period with a 13,3 second per vehicle delay, while during the P,M, peak period it operates at LOS C with a 27.4 second per vehicle delay, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level for the AM, peak hour remains the same with the delay increasing to 16,3 seconds per vehicle, During the P,M, peak hour the LOS level decreases to level E with a 58,5 second per vehicle delay, With the addition of the project and cumulative projects in the area, the LOS levels decrease to F during both the AM, and P,M, peak hour period with a 163,6 second per vehicle delay in the AM, peak hour and a 318,5 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, peak hour. Thus, both the AM, and P,M, peak hour impacts are considered to be cumulatively considerable, Mitigation Measure 3,3-5 will add a fourth through lane in each direction on Highway 79 through La Paz Street. This addition of a fourth lane should be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed by other project applicants prior to this time, the responsibility to finish construction will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services to complete, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, With the addition of this Mitigation Measure the intersection will operate at LOS D with a 40,7 second per vehicle delay in the AM, period and remain at LOS F with an 86,9 second per vehicle delay during the P,M, peak hour. As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-5 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Thus, this impact will remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation, Impact 3.3-6: SR 79/ Pechanga Pkwy The Highway 79 and Pechanga Parkway intersection currently operates at LOS C with a 23,3 second per vehicle delay during the A,M, peak hour period, and at LOS E with a 73,9 second per vehicle delay during the P,M, peak hour period, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the A,M, peak hour LOS level will remain the same with an increase in delay to 26,6 seconds per vehicle, During the P,M, peak hour the LOS level degrades to level F with a 109,7 second per vehicle delay, Because the P,M, intersection is already below D before the addition of the Project, and the increase in delay is greater than 2 seconds, this impact is considered to be a cumulative impact without the Project, With the addition of the Project and the cumulative projects in the area, the LOS levels degrade to LOS F during both the AM, and P,M, peak hour period with a 125,0 second per vehicle delay during the A,M, and a 517,2 second delay during the P,M, peak hour period, The Supplemental EIR proposes Mitigation Measure 3,3-6, which will add a second eastbound right-turn lane on Highway 79 at Pechanga Parkway, This second eastbound lane should be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finish construction will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, However, even with the imposition of this mitigation measure, the cumulatively significant impact will remain significant and unavoidable as the LOS level will remain at F for the P,M, peak hour with a 365,6 second per vehicle delay, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-6 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Impact 3.3-7: SR 79/ Jedediah Smith Rd; SR 79 / Avenida De Missiones; SR 79 /Country Glen Way; SR 79 / Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Road The current conditions for the intersection of Highway 79 and Jedediah Smith Road is LOS B during the AM, peak hour with a 10,5 second per vehicle delay and LOS B during the P,M, peak hour period with a 15,6 second per vehicle delay, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS levels will remain the same, but the delay will slightly increase to 11,0 seconds per vehicle during the A,M, peak hour and 17,2 seconds per vehicle delay during the P,M, peak hour. With the addition of the project and cumulative projects, the LOS level is expected to decrease to LOS C in the AM, peak hour with a 30,7 second per vehicle delay, and to LOS F in the P,M, peak hour period with a 123,5 second per vehicle delay, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the P,M, peak hour to decrease to F, and because the delay is greater than 2 seconds, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, In an effort to alleviate this significant impact, Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 is discussed in the Supplemental EIR, This measure would improve signal coordination along Highway 79, including the Jedediah Smith Road intersection, the Highway 79 and Avenida De Missiones intersection, and the Highway 79 and Redhawk Parkway and Margarita Road intersection, In addition to the improved signal coordination, the measure also mandates the construction of lane geometry improvements and modifications to the existing traffic signal at the main Project driveway, These modifications should be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finalize these modifications will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services, the Project applicant, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 and other related mitigation measures, the LOS level during the P,M, peak hour will be LOS E with a 75,3 second per vehicle delay and the impact during the AM, peak hour will be fully mitigated, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Thus, this impact will remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation, Impact 3.3-8: SR 79 / Avenida De Missiones The current conditions for the intersection of Highway 79 and Avenida De Missiones is LOS A during the AM, peak hour with a 6.4 second per vehicle delay and LOS A during the P,M, peak hour period with a 7,6 second per vehicle delay, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS levels will remain the same with the delay increasing slightly to 6,7 in the AM, peak hour and to 8,7 in the P,M, peak hour. With the addition of the Project and cumulative projects, the LOS level is expected to degrade to LOS B in the A,M, peak hour with a 12,9 second per vehicle delay and LOS F in the P,M, peak hour period with a 95,3 second per vehicle delay, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the P,M, peak hour to degrade to F, and because the delay is greater than 2 seconds, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, In an effort to alleviate this significant impact, Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 is discussed in the Supplemental EIR, This measure would improve signal coordination along Highway 79, including the Avenida De Missiones intersection, the Highway 79 and Jedediah Smith Road intersection, and the Highway 79 and Redhawk Parkway and Margarita Road intersection, In addition to the improved signal coordination, the measure also mandates the construction of lane geometry improvements and modifications to the existing traffic signal at the main Project driveway, These modifications should be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finalize these modifications will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services, the Project applicant, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 and other related mitigation measures, the LOS level during the P,M, peak hour will be reduced to LOS E with a 60,6 second per vehicle and the impact during the AM, peak hour will be fully mitigated, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Thus, this impact will remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation, Impact 3.3-9: SR 79/ Country Glen Way The current conditions for the intersection of Highway 79 and Country Glen Road is LOS A during the AM, peak hour with a 5,0 second per vehicle delay and LOS B during the P,M, peak hour period with a 10,1 second per vehicle delay, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS levels remain the same, with the delay increasing slightly to 5,2 during the AM, peak hour and to 11,1 during the P ,M, peak hour. With the addition of the Project and cumulative projects, the LOS level is expected to decrease to LOS E in the AM, peak hour with a 77,3 second per vehicle delay and LOS F in the P,M, peak hour period with a 244,6 second per vehicle delay, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the AM, peak hour to degrade to level E and the P,M, peak hour to degrade to F, and the delay is greater than 2 seconds, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, In an effort to alleviate this significant impact, Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 is discussed in the Supplemental EIR, This measure would improve signal coordination along Highway 79, including the Country Glen Way intersection, the Highway 79 and Jedediah Smith Road intersection, the Highway 79 and Avenida De Missiones, and the Highway 79 and Redhawk Parkway and Margarita Road intersection, In addition to the improved signal coordination, the measure also mandates the construction of lane geometry improvements and modifications to the existing traffic signal at the main Project driveway, These modifications shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finalize these modifications will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services, the project applicant, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 and other related mitigation measures, the LOS level during the AM, peak hour period will be LOS B with a 15,7 second per vehicle delay, and during the P,M, peak hour will remain LOS F with a 131,5 second per vehicle delay, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Thus, this P,M, peak hour impact will remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation, Impact 3.3-10: SR 79/ Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Rd The current conditions for the intersection of Highway 79 and Redhawk Parkway and Margarita Road is LOS C during the A,M, peak hour with a 28.4 second per vehicle delay and LOS C during the P,M, peak hour period with a 32,1 second per vehicle delay, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS levels remain at C, but the delay increases to 30,8 during the AM, peak hour and to 34,9 during the P,M, peak hour. With the addition of the project and cumulative projects, the LOS level is expected to degrade to LOS F in the AM, peak hour with a 178,0 second per vehicle delay and LOS F in the P,M, peak hour period with a 264,0 second per vehicle delay, Because the addition of the Project along with the cumulative projects causes the AM, and P,M, peak hour to degrade to F, and the delay is greater than 2 seconds, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, In an effort to alleviate this significant impact, Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 is discussed in the Supplemental EIR, This measure would improve signal coordination along Highway 79, including the intersection Redhawk ParkwaylMargarita Road, the Highway 79 and Jedediah Smith Road intersection, the Highway 79 and Avenida De Missiones, and the Highway 79 and Country Glen Way intersection, In addition to the improved signal coordination, the measure also mandates the construction of lane geometry improvements and modifications to the existing traffic signal at the main Project driveway, These modifications should be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if it is not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finalize these modifications will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services, the project applicant, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 and other related mitigation measures, both the AM, and P,M, peak hour LOS levels will remain at F with a 142,5 second per vehicle delay in the AM, peak hour and a 212,5 second per vehicle delay in the P,M, peak hour. As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Thus, this impact will remain significant and unavoidable even with mitigation, Impact 3.3-11: SR 79Westofl-15 The roadway segment of Highway 79 west of Interstate 15 currently operates at LOS A with a vlc ratio of 0,578, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level decreases to B with the vlc ratio at 0,630, With the addition of the Project and other cumulative projects in the area, the LOS level will further degrade to E and the vlc ratio will increase to 0,953, Any increase in vlc ratio of greater than 2 percent is considered to be significant, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the LOS level to degrade to level E, and the vlc increase is greater than 2 percent, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 3,3-3 and 3,3-4 which will add lanes to both the northbound and southbound ramps of Highway 79 the traffic flow on this segment of highway will greatly improve, However, because the ability to add lanes to the southbound and northbound ramps requires coordination with Caltrans, mitigation measures 3,3-3 and 3,3-4 are deemed infeasible because the responsibility for the ramps is that of another agency and not the City of Temecula, Because the cumulative impact at this roadway segment cannot be mitigated with certainty, it is considered significant and unmitigable, Impact 3.3-12: SR 79 between 1-15 and Pechanga Parkway The roadway segment of Highway 79 between Interstate 15 and Pechanga Parkway currently operates at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 1.440, At Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level will remain at F with the vlc ratio at 1,569, This is considered to be a significant cumulative impact without the addition of the Project because the roadway segment is below level D prior to the addition of the Project and the increase in vlc ratio is greater than 2 percent. With the addition of the Project and the cumulative projects in the area, the roadway segment will remain at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 2,288, Mitigation Measures 3,3-5 and 3,3-6 which will add a fourth through lane in each direction on Highway 79 through La Paz Street, and will add a second eastbound right-turn lane on Highway 79 at Pechanga Parkway will mitigate this cumulative impact but not to a level of insignificance, The modifications specified by these mitigation measures should be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building in Phase IA of the Project, and if these modifications are not completed prior to this time, the responsibility to finalize these modifications will be the responsibility of Universal Health Services, the Project applicant, subject to potential reimbursement by the City or other projects, Even with implementation of these mitigation measures the roadway segment will continue to operate at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 1,718 therefore constituting a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measures 3,3-5 and 3,3-6 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and the necessary right-of-way cannot be obtained, Impact 3.3-13: SR 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road The roadway segment Highway 79 between Pechanga Parkway and Margarita Road currently operates at LOS C with a vlc ratio of 0,724, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level remains at C with the vlc ratio increasing to 0,789, With the addition of the Project and the other cumulative projects in the area, the roadway segment will operate at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 1 ,530, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the LOS level to degrade to level F, and because the increase in vlc ratio is greater than 2 percent, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, Even with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7 and other related mitigation measures, the LOS level and vlc ratio will remain the same, Thus, this cumulative impact is considered significant and unavoidable, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Impact 3.3-14: SR 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road The roadway segment Highway 79 between Margarita Road and Butterfield Stage Road currently operates at LOS B with a vlc ratio of 0,635, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level remains at B with the vlc ratio increasing to 0,692, With the addition of the Project and the other cumulative projects in the area, the roadway segment will operate at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 1,111, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the LOS level to rise to F, and the increase in vlc ratio is greater than 2 percent, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, Even with the implementation of Mitigation Measure 3,3-7, the LOS and vlc ratio will remain the same, Thus, this cumulative impact is considered significant and unavoidable, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-7 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right-of-way cannot be obtained, Impact 3.3-15: Pechanga Parkway south of SR 79 The roadway segment of Pechanga Parkway, south of Highway 79 currently operates at LOS F with a vlc ratio of 1,258, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level will remain at F with the vlc ratio increasing to 1,371, Because the LOS level is already below D before the addition of the Project, and the increase in vlc ratio between the existing conditions and the Opening Day Without the Project is greater than 2 percent, this impact is considered to be a cumulative impact without the project. With the addition of the project and other cumulative projects in the area, the LOS level will remain at F, but the vlc ratio will increase to 2,053, Mitigation Measure 3,3-8 which will add a third through lane on Pechanga Parkway in both directions will cause a decrease in vlc ratio, but not to a level of insignificance, Thus, even with mitigation, the LOS level will remain at F and the vlc ratio will slightly decrease to 1,299, Therefore, this cumulative impact is considered significant and unavoidable, As provided in the Supplemental EIR, there are no feasible mitigation measures beyond measure 3,3-8 that would reduce this significant cumulative impact because no regional circulation improvements can be accommodated due to the fact that the area is built out and that the necessary right of way cannot be obtained, Impact 3.3-16: Margarita Road from De Portola Road to Highway 79 The roadway segment of Margarita Road from De Portola Road to Highway 79 currently operates at LOS C with a vlc ratio of 0,730, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level will remain at C with the vlc ratio increasing to 0,796, With the addition of the Project and other cumulative projects in the region, the LOS level decreases to F with a vlc ratio of 1,050, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the LOS level to degrade to F, and because the increase in vlc ratio is greater than 2 percent, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, There are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce this cumulative impact. As discussed in the SEIR, the City examined capacity enhancements, but determined none were feasible because of the limitations within the existing right-of-way, As such, this impact remains significant and unavoidable, Impact 3.3-17: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 The roadway segment of Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 70 currently operates at LOS C with a vlc ratio of 0,702, At Project Opening Day Without the Project, the LOS level will remain at C with the vlc ratio increasing to 0,765, With the addition of the Project and cumulative projects, the LOS level deteriorates to F with a vlc ratio of 1,074, Because the addition of the Project with the cumulative projects causes the LOS level drops to F, and because the increase in vlc ratio is greater than 2 percent, the impact is considered cumulatively considerable, There are no feasible mitigation measures to reduce this significant cumulative impact other than the requirement that the Project applicant pay the City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit, As discussed in the SEIR, the City examined capacity enhancements, but determined none were feasible because of the limitations within the existing right-of-way, As such, this impact remains significant and unavoidable, v, Proiect Alternatives. The City considered a range of reasonable alternatives as discussed in the Final EIR and Supplemental EIR, Because the prior legal challenges did not contest the validity of the Final EIR alternative analysis, and because a previously unavailable alternate site became available during the pendancy of the legal challenges, the Supplemental EIR examines only a new Alternative Seven, which consists of an alternative site alternative at the Former Temecula Education Center. For the reasons provided below, this alternative has been considered and rejected, Section 1, ALTERNATIVE SEVEN: ALTERNATIVE SITE ALTERNATIVE - FORMER TEMECULA EDUCATION CENTER ALTERNATIVE A. Summary of Alternative The Alternative Site Alternative, Former Temecula Education Center Alternative considers an alternative location for the proposed Project. The former Temecula Education Center site, located southwest of the intersection of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway, and immediately west of Murrieta Creek, is approximately 40 acres in size, and is located within the City, immediately adjacent to the City of Murrieta to the northwest, The former Temecula Education Center site was previously the subject of applications proposing use of the site as an education complex, including an education center, a research and development/conference center, a day care facility, retail facilities, apartment units and associated parking, The Temecula Education Center project has been withdrawn from further consideration by the City and thus the site is potentially available for consideration and evaluation as an alternative site for the proposed Project. Access to the Temecula Education Center site is via Diaz Road, via either Rancho California Road or Winchester Road, Surrounding land uses include open space to the north, Murrieta Creek and open space to the east, business park /warehouse uses to the south and a mining operation, open space and the Santa Rosa Plateau to the west. This site is currently owned by the City of Temecula and all properties would need to be under the applicant's control for the Project to proceed, A Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit would be required, B, Reasons for Reiectinq Alternative This alternative site, similar to the proposed Project site, would not have a significant impact with regard to cultural resources, geology and soils, hazards and hazardous materials, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, and utilities and service systems since this alternative could lead to a similar Project, and all other provisions of the proposed Project would be implemented, Alternative Seven has the potential to result in adverse aesthetic and land use compatibility impacts due to the less intense development in the vicinity of the alternate site, whereas the proposed Project does not. Noise impacts associated with this alternative could be less than the proposed Project due to slightly shorter helicopter trips and the location of the project site on the western boundary of the City, which would require a flight path over fewer residential neighborhoods, Biological resource impacts would be similar to the proposed Project. Traffic impacts would be slightly worse, All other impacts would be comparable to those associated with the Project. Further, this alternative would attain each of the Project objectives set forth by the City of Temecula and the Project applicant, as provided in the Supplemental EIR, outside of using the actual site as currently proposed, Although Alternative Seven would meet each of the objectives set out by the City of Temecula and the Project applicant, it has the potential to result in adverse aesthetic and land use compatibility impacts, and increased traffic impacts, The City Council hereby finds that each of the reasons set forth above constitutes an independent ground for rejecting Alternative Seven as infeasible and by itself, independent of any other reason, would justify rejection of Alternative Seven as infeasible, Section 2, ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE Even with the addition of Alternative Seven, the Supplemental EIR identifies, and the City Council concurs that Alternative Six, Construction of Hospital Only, discussed more fully in the Final EIR, is the Environmentally Superior Alternative, However, because that Alternative would not meet the applicant's objective to provide a regional hospital facility that includes standard hospital services, with outpatient care, rehabilitation, and medical offices because of the fact that it would result only in construction of the hospital, and would not provide the same levels of rehabilitation or any of the medical office uses stated in the applicant's objectives, it is rejected, Section 3, THE PROJECT AS PROPOSED A. Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in both the EIR and the Supplemental EIR, B, Reasons for Selectinq Proiect as Proposed The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of Alternative Seven described in the Supplemental EIR and has compared it with those of the proposed Project. The City Council also relies on the prior accuracy of the alternative analysis which was not legally challenged and remains valid, This analysis of Alternative Seven together with the previous alternative analysis in the Final EIR is adequate for CEQA purposes, and the City Council finds that Alternative Seven is infeasible for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons, The City Council further finds, for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons set forth in Exhibit B that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interests of the public, EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection with the proposed approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital Project (the "Project"), CEQA requires the decision-making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project, If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable, CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable, Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record, The reasons for proceeding with this Project despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations, The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable short-term, long-term and cumulative air quality impacts, noise impacts associated with the maximum potential number of emergency helicopter flights identified in the Final EIR, siren noise, construction noise, and direct traffic impacts and cumulative traffic impacts identified in the SEIR and in the record, In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts, The City Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project, A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because while they generally have similar or less environmental impacts, they do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings, B, The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will support the diversification of Temecula's economic and employment base, including but not limited to biomedical, research, and office facilities, C, The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will provide superior, easily accessible necessary medical services to the local community, including but not limited to emergency, acute, outpatient, and cancer medical care and physical rehabilitation services, Southwest Riverside County in general, and the City of Temecula specifically, is in need of new and expanded hospital facilities to enhance the ability to provide medical services to the area which continues to experience substantial population growth and related increased demand for medical services, 0, The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will provide the region with new employment opportunities for highly trained medical and medical services workers, E, The Temecula Regional Hospital will be centrally located, with access from a major roadway, to best serve the medical service needs of local residents and the region, The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided to the public through approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts of the Temecula Regional Hospital that cannot be mitigated, The City Council further finds that each of the individual Temecula Regional Hospital benefits discussed above outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and SEIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable, The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts, TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Final Supplemental EIR - SCH # 2005031017 Prepared for: City of T emecula January 2008 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Final Supplemental EIR - SCH # 2005031017 Prepared for: City of T emecuia January 2008 9191 Towne Centre Drive Suite 340 San Diego, CA 92122 858.638.0900 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 207434 ESA Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Pursuant to Section 21081,6 of the Public Resources Code and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, a public agency is required to adopt a monitoring and reporting program for assessing and ensuring compliance with any required mitigation measures applied to a proposed development. As stated in the Public Resources Code: "".the public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects," Section 21081,6 provides general guidelines for implementing mitigation monitoring programs and indicates that specific reporting andlor monitoring requirements, to be enforced during project implementation, shall be defined prior to final certification of the EIR. The public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or a private entity, which accept delegations, The lead agency, however, remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occur in accordance with the program, The mitigation monitoring table below lists mitigation measures required of the project in order to reduce the significant effects of the project. These measures may also be included as conditions of approval for the project. These measures correspond to those discussed in Sections 3,1 through 3,3 of the Draft EIR; and reflect any revisions in this document. To ensure that the mitigation measures are properly implemented, a monitoring program has been devised which identifies the timing and responsibility for monitoring each measure, The applicant will have the responsibility for implementing the measures, and the various City of Temecula departments will have the primary responsibility for monitoring and reporting the implementation of the mitigation measures, This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) is set up as a compliance report, with space for confirming the correct mitigation measures have been implemented for the T emecula Regional Hospital project. In order to sufficiently track and document the status of mitigation measures, the matrix below has been prepared with the following components: . Mitigation measure . Monitoring phase . Enforcement agency . Monitoring agency . Action Indicating Compliance . Verification of Compliance (for use during the reporting/monitoring) Information pertaining to compliance with mitigation measures or any necessary modifications and refinements will be documented in the verification of compliance portion of the matrix, The mitigation matrix follows this section, TemecuJa Regional Hospilal Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ESA/0207434 January200a ~ :;; ~ E u tJ. c ,~ Q. E 0 ~ 0 '0 1;; 0 e 0 :; ~ w ~ ;g :E '" c iB u c ,- .. 'C_ c- -'" c E 00 ,..: :wu u Z <( 0 ~ ,., :;: U c ~ii1i ~ ~ -Cl '" Wo "'~ '2 -'0. .s ;:!Cl 'c -z 0 0._ :Ii "'Ii: 00 :I: 0. -'w C <(~ " i;' z E 00 ~ c -z u" Cl<( ~'" lli!Cl ,2<( c ::'i~ w :JO 0'" w- ~ :;:z i(l wO ...:;: .c 0- Z '" 0 '2 ~ .s Cl 'c ;:: 0 ~ :Ii E ~ ~ E a. ~ e " o ~ . '" ~ e . ~ c B 'c o " e o ~ ~ ~ " :rn:.8 -'" jffig ,~ ~~ : e 5 () i~~ ," ;~ >. C E :m;!::"Q)cu iE 5 [E !~ E..ei _Ea>a. 00> Q) .~() ~ 0 :0 'ttI !~ z, E c 0).- Q) (l) E 5 E E i~ E~i :0 5 ~ 5r i~()~Cl '0 'e :0 c !~~ >..... ::::I ;~~ '0 c 00 ,~o ia: ! ! j , I """"""! I I ."'."._~~~~___{.,_._ ._...m._..........__.,_~__~____,~_._..,_.__ ~:g ;:!:~ ~ iij ;:j ~ w~ "-...-.------..-.+..----.----- I" ~~Ec 11)._ 0,) Q) E 5 E E Q) E 8"1:: t: E Q) ~ ,00 a; Q) :~()Cl 0 10 ! l!S! _ In z-c: 1: '0).- Q) Q) IE 5 [E ~Eo1:: _ Ed) ~ 100 a; Q) .z;>OOCl 10 I ~ i..... 0 c: (ij ,ctl-c-crn 0 . '.!:2 Q) (1)_ ..Q"'C~"'C i'c.!: co ctI Q) C c:2 ; U)!9 C)(ii ~ 15 ro Q) +-' :-g ~ ~~ti~ ~5co ~ :t5....QlO'(1)==o.Ev. ,Q)(l)I.Il.!!lQ.ttlc-U)wO".... ::;:j Q)"'C CII-C CoC:::l m~ :m "..c.s~:~go.sf6 E ci= .... <l.l = +-' CD"E ~ :? di~.Q-5 g'~..c: ~~ Q) i....._(I).... >. Q)- mt::- :2 >._~.o ~ 0 g'.t;: 0 ~ :1i) c: ~ lI.l"'C 10 1ij:;::; c: g. ~ ;0.. ttl ....Q.~ c"'C!!! 0 cu :..~2 E'S'- 0:::::1 C ~ IV :~ oS! 5 en rr ~ 0 ~-g .... ~ ;,,":'w 8 IJ) ~ eM..... ctI ~ 8 ,M _ c: -g I/J 0 c: ~ U) _'- 'Q)S Q) ttI ttI (,L_ '$ :::l(ij~ 's'c...<l.I ~-':'=2.!!:!.g..c >- iUl U) ....$~.<(.Cii(ij.... WoO : ~ ~ :'w 13 .i-~ :u ~ '* Z' ~ ::!~'6 ~.s~'::~~'5i~ ::J :c (I) (I)'U2~ 0;'51UJ2 ii: i~ 8.. ~ ~.~ rn -g 1ij (tj E (tj w [lJ,[e..e-e~ ~ ~~ 5l ~ ~ :2 CD ~ g 0. g. g."* g. CD g. :!5 i:E:s"8Ci) g-:c:cCi):C~:C l!! " .. .. ~ :Ii c o :; '" '" i '5:B Q)E:t:: g"fi E "" ~ ::lEa.. .. 0 -'!c w N c o e U.Q !2g !~~ IP . .."..l..."..-,-..,-..--~~,~~,."'-"-.,.,. i:' .8~ ~ . L.. , ~o m _~~ ~(I)E'U 0 B~^ '5~2~~~j~g~~~m ~~~ g~E~~~~C~$~~E.c~~~~~~ m_ell.......L..c. ..... 0. .u....Q).- !~]! t5J1i.2 e-2~:BE E~o~ rJm<(~ [(I) Q) 0 . 0.00 m L.......=.!:O_ ._" 0..2 = 0. 8 !: ::I (I) '0 O'w g- c.(f) CXl ~ell~~~:Cll~g~Z'~UClle~~ 1.....t5~rn~.c c:=,,1Q'o-m.Q)= g-li"i::: j.9 CD o.:!:::'--'- 0 Q)J!:! ~ O'm'm L.... lL..'O'E g.g o~ ~:E'21:!:2 0..:5 Q)$lr l.g S.Cll 0'Uij3 ~'U E; ell..... >'Q)';'1:::S 0.0 'a.. (I).c: CD (I)" ~ L.. E 0 c: ~ ell 0 !..~ s'UU o'S:.~~Q):::'~- ~~"fi" [N _ 0. Q) m 0.._ L.. - ti (I) 0 c: c: .c c: 'L..ca(l)o.(I)'U:;:Im ~ -m'U::ICll ~S>8..~~,~"~~~E~~i(f)~ M_=O >'"'0(1) Q)Q)~eO-~ lCl>'~ 0 L..O;:: Q) c:c1? L.. E:;::; I:: s.0::::l'-- I... I:: (I) 0.0 Q) Ij: 0 ell ~ - Q) I:: 0 LL 'U ::J ~ 'U Q) > 0.=:;::; 0,- (I) ..... Q) 0 g-t) c: =0.C:=L..e~~~fr2E:E3"om 'Q)E ell L.. Q) o.c-ClQ.Q) Olm=_ c:'<taS I':i Q) i.2:5-g" ~~~'"Em g.~ ca:::::", cEm'U~m1ijQ)~~B=Ol'U~~~ 1.9 -5 3: 2 0 'U~,,:E'O' Q)'C ~.S 2.Q '=-!::::: -m'UolQ)Q)caL..aoc:c:Q).....>.~ j~e c:.g~=a w,g Q.E E';'1:::So..~ gr-: ':= 0 :;:I c: LU c: c: Q. Q) m = 0 c: E ::I Q) N !:i:B ~8~~g g-~~giii8 8 ~g>R I E . ~ o n. ~ ~ o ~ ,l;!~ ~~ " c o . :: ~ g:g "1:>>"2 . 0 "'~ . 0 , 0 ",:;::: . . ~~ >-~ ~ - m ~ = u ~ c '" ,~ Q. = 0 s (,) '0 m c c ,9 1ii u '" 'C 0 ~ ~ :s Cl e ,- ~ 1iiu u c ,- m ." ,- .5i5.. e = 00 ,- (,) ,..: ~ z 0 !:!. ~ :;; e ",1:2 ~ Cl -C) <( Wo Cl c mil<: 'C -'0.. S ~C) '2 -z 0 0..- :;; (I)~ 00 "0.. -'w E <(Il<: ~ ~ Zc = Qz ~ e C)< ~ ~ WC) .$!~ Il<:z c :502 w ::10 UI- W- ~ :;;z 0 wO m 1-:;; .c "- Z Cl 0 e ~ 'c S C) '2 ;:: 0 :ii :;; E ~ a 2 a. a c " o ~ .1! ~ e . a c 'c S '0 o '" c o 1ii g " e " o m ~ :;; c ,9 1ii ~ iiii ! ~CI) .....~c Om" :1: (/) 0: :~~~ :1:: m (j) :~g>> i~~~ ffi0 i-sf .... i~(I) 5i :E"O E ol1)t:1:: ...."'m _ Cl 0. ;0 C Q) !~:QCl :iJ '5 OJ ;.!2 .... ii3~cE '11)'- (l) Q) :E 5 E E ,Q) E !5-1:: i!;: Em ~ 00:> v Z.O~D io e ;g 5 !~~ 'CI'Il ;0 C ,0 0 iebU i&: . o '5 z .8 - 0'" ~'E ~ 0 ~,!:: '" e =Cl O)'(i) e '" .~ ." 0,0 =1) .$!~ lllB" ~ c.u ;:~[ . - = N c'- M'-- <1)uffi -~" ,,~= ~~'~ CD C'- :;;00 " ~ 2i<l.l:5 :;::::;..oQ) m:Q1ij ~6g '-..c'- :;;"'= I I I I I I ~ ~ MO ~o _N ~ ~ o . ::( ~ 0~ w ;-0 .~ i'~ '" '0: ,e .0 iz '< 0. o 011) a> i~UoO iO "'C 1jCU .2 CD Q);;i ]!-g'E .c-co 'ag tJ) = m rJ ~ .... ..c 2'0-8 ~'5 .c .2'w gj .c: -,... (/) ~ ~ c: ..."E~1ij:E::' E _0> o~ .E en g..cU Q) (6,5: E c -c2!"C:~ ~"tii2! (l)~~ .~~-g~;. '3 CI):J '5ES g.SCll:~.c cr,Eg CoCl) ~';::~t)-g ~~~~ mum Ql20ctl:l=: Q!Eca> ~EE ..cc-c ,- -;:J :Eci=c _'-csE ,~~Q.lE:5 _co =Q)'3'-(j)~ES;:;o..E ~8:s 3::5.ct)2o..0llJ~'52 :> '" C (l) =- __ ell U "'C N 0""- C "'C ,Q> g g ;:; ~ ~"ffi -0 'w Q) ~ ~ ffi E :m'U)Qj 8"O,Q-ffi~5.g 0.$-0 ~ ~ E -c -g,~ 5 ~ fS ~ g.,!:: ~ :> ,5: ~ ffi ~ ~ 15 e .s ~ a.~.g B~.s5s(U.s:~c.uig~ai '~.c,~;g~~ ~j 8 rJ~'e-;: ~ .c ~- 0 Q) Q) 0 >.... Q) 0. 0.. CD alu::s. E:5 E 0 -g ,!!2 ~ g. Q.l ~ 6 :2~!g~.s~=a:~~mo.t=~~ . . . . . ill :2 < Q.l >,0 Q.l 0 !...... 0 :0 '00 00 Q.l_ ~ :~~ ~~,~ g :5 '5 ,0 '5 m ffi ~ 0 Q.l..... Q.l ~Q.l 2"0 Q.l~"O:5 ~!;: ,s:; c..~ C'c OO..c: o+:'" ;,1- f!J..... -c Cl= 0 . c. ~ 0 Q.l Co :::::l'c:E !~g C)~:5-g~,2>~ ,,- 0 C'" C)m;!;;:: 00 0 ::::::l :::::l'c c..C..... m Q.l : O-'::::::::l o'c 00 ...c"O iQ.l oo"o.....:::::l Q.l 00"0 ~ ,.0:::: C Q.l >,"0 OO:::::l_ m !Q.l 0 OOC Q.l'o.c:::::l_ :c~'o O,!f!ZI- ~ c.. ,0 0 c..... 0 .u.i 2 ,2 Vl C C C 00 C 00 C ,....... 0 ~ C ~.Q C Q.l :N :::::l;: Q.l 0"0 - ~ E !~~ Owts:a ~'(i) e :CW) Q.lE;;; 2s:;~ ~r5 !l!:5 ~'-t)-c >,c 0- ~ '8"Occom~ lent>> COttlc"3c : ttl.!:_ m 0 00 Q.l..c 0 idlE ~'~E ~~E~ ,:55= 0 m 21:1 E to c) ! igQ.l:g~';;;5Q.lEE I f,+: g C)"'" cOO c.g E to m:;::; rn Q.l -'- 0, : D)C'E(J)-c !!?.2>Q.l c Q.l iE~o-g'(jj5&'~~'6 ,:55 0 C to ~.c rn C to cl , I E . ~ 2 ~ ~ c ~ [ !!&! '0.-0 . < o . ~ ~ .. < c - DB ';:D'c . 0 "", . c , 0 o ~ ~i ~~ ~ ~ m S 5 c ~ ,~ ;s, 5 0 S " '0 m 0 " 0 ~ u !E .. ~ ~ :s '" " ,- ~ 1;iu u" ,- m " ,- .Eo.. ,,5 ~ 00 ,..: t;O Z <( 0 !:!. il' :;; " ..:ii1i ~ :t -Cl Wo '" In..: ,5 ...J,,- S j:!Cl '2 -z 0 "-- :;; In~ 00 :1:,,- ...Jw C <(..: ~ ,., z 5 00 u ~ " -z u~ Cl<( .2~ ll!Cl c :3~ w =>0 01- w- ~ :;;z wo :€ 1-:;; '" 0. Z '" 0 ,5 ~ S Cl '2 ;:: 0 :!i :;; E ~ ~ e "- ~ c 'E o ~ . '" ~ c . ~ c 'c jl '. o " c o ~ :8> " 10> :c :'C ;'S :m~ !'O E [IDa> i(.)o... c " :~ 1m :~ "" '"5 +-' i~~&i&i E 5 E E i~E~@ :'5 ~ ~ g. i~U~Cl 'U " a~cc Q).- Q) Q) jE 5 E E Q) E g.t: !: E ID ~ 00> Q) >.0 I1l Cl _ 0 (} ~~ MO ~o ~N ~ ~ :;;: ~ '" . w, I -~~----~ I I I I -I I I ; ; I I '--_.~ " c o 1:5 E '" " o o jQ, 10: ~ ~ .. m ~ :;; " o 1ii '" '" i ia '~i!! c';:: ~~ ,0 n:l i8:;E i}~ ',\1 ~ mOl ,~a... '..<0 ,_ C) i. c: '(")(0 i~~ ::;ll. '(I) C m" ~" :;;1; 1c Q) '0.0 ~ !I~~ I- i:! I a::: I I I I I I I I I I I E . ~ o "- ~ ~ o ~ jji~ .~ . c ~~ g:S -m';:; " 0 ~~ . c " 0 0" . . E" ~~ i!! ..cl!! .@_~ Q)i;' ~i3o e>CrIl ...em .gQ)~ me- .- ...."'C_Em cO .:2:u.1ij.s E1ii.e ~ ~ IV-55 00 -- ~Jf (; 2i~ B"-o-o!:..a';~ :5 :> 0..'1: ttI c: ceo C = ... 5~ g-o..g'Q.~~ ~~~ ~ m (/}-oo;$:CC::1(ijOU-oQ..>- ~OF~3'Q) g~~~ EC3~ a:: I u...c.c__,!::_ rIl Q)+-' (/) c~o.!!;!o 0 ffi"E:S (1):5,5 ~ ~cami3c2,~g'~5oSE "'Ccu.9:;IDg><tic.u_;!::E" .9l Cu.. (.) E.- ~ 0._ c: -g._ E ~'EQ)Q)Q)-g:em~EQ);(l) 5i g ~ ~ t.2 ~ ~.Q' CLI ~:c e a...ocnl-oa... -~(I)~<Ll::a. ---o....~-~<( 2 0>0 Ctl E () <<1_ 0.-0 o-!i= m.... -.- m c: 9! >;() Q) Q) n:l--o tv Q) "3 .9llf: :::: >..!::: 8 (I) ~ lB Q) >..c o(J)vuccc:ctlQ)EEg>.:::: <Llo:t:::-o(tlQ)(tJf.c ::13:0 Eu:: ::I v.... ::I ...... V..o 0 v'h;aJ.= 0 ~ (I).!;:t: ~ EI 5 1-~.9 5-~"""~ C)l1)~'O)~+;i '5 ......Q)l:::Eol::EEL..._~ ~ ~ L.. ~ g v:c~._l1)() Co .?;-o L.. >-cn..l:: ~= Q.v..o l1) E C3a::U5l!.22u):S~.S ~.9:S 8 ,..: z o !:!. :;; 0::1:2 -Cl wO "'0:: -'0.. ;:!:Cl -z 0..- "'~ 00 ::t:o.. -'w <(0:: Zc QZ Cl<( WCl O::z <(- -,0:: ::>0 01- w- :;;Z wO 1-:;; Z o ~ Cl ;:: :E E . c, e <>. ~ c '" o ~ . '" ~ c . ~ c B 'c o " c o ~ ~ ~ " " u C :! E .'!l o ~ o c 'l5 c o :; ~ .; ... :;::::; ~ :E D) C i u" ,- U "'c .5~ c= oc. -E tio 00(0 ~ c " E ~t; .eai CD) Woo( It -E o ~ " " u<>. c " ,~ ~ -'l '" a~1:c <1)'_ ttl Q) E 5 E E l~ E~~ '...... E ~ c.. 00 Q) ID J ~UClO u ~,~-- 'm_ -- ~ ~ E [!}, ~ c " ~ D) C '~ S '2 o :!! " o ~ .c 0. D) 'S S '2 o :!! e " o '" " :!! C ,2 10 D) '" :ii ; I I b I.; ,e g I~ ~ 11 E t- Ii i '" l~~~c E'S E E (1) E o.t:: !:E~~ 00> Q) >>() \1) 0 IG 0 i l___,____""" i I"~ u 2 1>; 15 8 ,~ 0. " ,c :;2~ <>>S ....c "'" me; 5~ ~ c ""~ ",0 "'U ,.- ~~ ~a:: ..(/) "''' ....,c "':: mo CD) o~ ~:2 '" iij'o ,..s ~€ ';::::1 c,g ~~ ~8 ~N ~ ~ c . ::t ~ ~~ w . I I I _ml I I I '" ~ _m ~ ro-c ~ C-.,cQ) "'C~= ~o ~~ ~ ~c 0 oc- 2-C~Q) wt::; -cc~ wro Q) ~~~ m~w"'C (t'I::IIllCl ffic:sa. ~~z.~ >."5,::;<1> geE'> ~S~~ c:ct'I~~ ~!ce ~~o~Q) ;~S~ rn<l>m> o~~- WoOe.. ~ w~c: ~~~o c..5.-5.cug <l)t--,;::~ c'-o.-=:= Q)"'CC: 0 :~~U)_ ~- 0 C- ,- ~- ~~_-o'" _- ,- Q) LL. -. __ O~. o,,cw - '.. .... Cl . >"l:J "'CUl_-C- ~OO"€,~ ~ ~~~~~ c:Q)~C ~1:~SID C:C::IQ) ~~~: c:- '-~$m 152!:OE~= :;025 >.o'i::'Ct! "Q)~~-g ;gU)-o~ C:~E"'~ ~m5~ ~~~~~~~~~g E~~~ 9u ...>,,~c: u > -Q)C:~::IU)~~"'C ct'I U)Q)8!e~9~i~ ~~E~~ct'lQ)B~~ Q)~m_ :~~a~Q)E~E,c~~ ~5~"'C-o~Bu"'CQ) ~~Eti ;co"~-",o~~.n~c 0 Q)C:~>ct'lQ)C: ~E-c"~ -_ ......~'" Qi..c-g:C5oe~1io Q.)..... 1',~"'O ctl -5.i &..8 ~ ctl 5: ..... ti ,!::l ~..o 11. c. C:E ~ v 0 'Q; U) --Q.)Q.) ....."'0..0 ~@-",-~~=oo_ ~Q.)-~ amw~usti~c~ 0~cgoc~~a~ o=~oci U)~aU)~~~cctlS cQ.)~~~c"'O",~Q.)~,~~i~~ -~Eueg 5:Zg o€~~aoo~..o=Q.)~~"'Oo~ soo;C.U)i..ocQ.) N-~U) ~~"'O=ctlC_-ctl-~ ti~~a~imti~~ ~ctlQ.)~~~ c~~ctlctlSc"'C~ Q.)cQ.)",I-,~,2~E~ ~i:Ql-ctl>'",.!!!octlU)~~'B..ctlE<(~Q.) eoQ.)...... "'C ~'- ........>"'C .....- C U) ,,-- Q.)~..o5~~Q.)~""'Q.)~~~e~c~~~s~~o~~~~ Eg~rnws"'C~I~~~oc.Q.)~~~~aQ.)..8~e~~u '-~i~EE<(O--U)~;~8..o~Q.)~!~S!g~Q.)~ ~2~;g~oo Q..o~ctl~QO~~"'COl-ctlc...octl I-,~ ~ U) rnctl . . . . E . ~ e ~ ~ - ~ ~ ]j~ 'Q.-c . - o . ~ .~ c - 02 c,'c . 0 ~:II . c , 0 O~ ~i >-:11 .!! E :Ii ~ E ~ r:. e a. " ~ " c e " ! 0 a. . E l!l '" ~ 0 .. c 0 C .. '5 ~ c C .0 .0 0 .c :; 0 ~ 0 " 'ii c ~ '" ,Q :E ;; ~ ~ " '" c i " " ,- " "'e .5.. C= ~ 0'" ,..; ,- E 1:;0 z <1;0 0 ~ il' :0 I>:~ c " -Cl :i WO '" 0)1>: ,5 ...Ill. S ;:!:Cl '2 -z 0 11.- ::;; 0).... 01>: ,,0 ...Ill. <(W Zl>: ~ 00 e -z " Cl<( E wCl " il' :: I>:Z .g e <(- " ...II>: c'" ::>0 W<I; 0.... w- :oZ " wO 0 ....:0 .. .0 z II. 0 '" ~ -E s Cl '2 >= 0 :i! ::;; I i 'O~ IDE::: g"fi E ...." ::::lEa... 0" .'!1e W I. .. ra~EE <1)'_ ,() ID Cl :::: Cl U c o !~ i-t:i is l~ ,----. I" Ie !6 .0 .0 I:] .on 12: ,- 1~ I~ i~ I.. ~ I;; '" :" c I::;; o :8 ~ I~ tIJ 0: '" ~ If& " S o .. " ::;; e ,2 1ii ~ iii " ".0 .0- I,() -Om .....~.s::::5 .$ 5 CI),g 5 .f! S ~ c.:; U'J m 11"- Q},~-- E -::E"'O~"'" C ::l -0 a. Q) "a... CGE c. "0........= 01: ~v'~ 0 Q) ~ ~13.8 ~ Q) (0'-= 0 _;.C~mm (.) (.):>.c: 0 ,~m........1Jl t5 O-&:llV!:: 0...5 co g> (l) n..:5tcim~ 05~~~ j!!<f.lo20 a~N'S ~ 11l<l)c;<LIl:: ~5z-6~ !:~croJ!~+-> o Q) is ::1~(/) 1rl ~E g ~~'e- () Cf) <( ..... () c. ~ ~ M 0 ~ 0 ~ N 10 ~ o ~ <(~ fil co , , i i I 1 .---------1 I I I i I I i i I I I I I I I CCI l:: ....Q) C/) cg ~ .g~ "'C Q) ,- m 0 ~ Q):- LLc: jg..c 11l0) ~Q) m:o~ ~ co' .....:: ..c;e ~'(ij E ~ 2 ~ IJ) ::::>(/)~ 00 BEc5<U_u,_c I-~-g~ ~ 2 ~~"O Q)~ o!: g ~~g (/.):::1 ,-roc:c2:5Q)l::OCEc~ ~ ~.E 5- ~ ~~ ~ ui g ~~ ~ ';V ::l ~ ;:::E~~.E a e~.e :J.Q() ~~-g'iii ouo~Q)u2Q)Q)~oQ)cmm5 <-gc; ffi= 1ij'Q;~'~'~ -g ~ t5 M ffi ~ ~.a ~ ~ 0 u;-€ -~ >. > I- ::::i' 1-.S!:!-2:>cu..c0 c:-.z:."'Q) 0 ::::i"OI-(<")~c.C:_(I) AI-mmc:>_ ~ ffi (j) II) cu c: (J).a >.~ c.t:: 1:) '(ij ~ 0 II) C:~O'->(J)(I):E!O(iicut::l!!c (/)2o::::i..c: (J) (J) I-..c: II) ()O c.(I)::::i Q) ,- mUII);t-'..o....; cu - ttl.c....... E U E E C)CQ -c m ~ 0 () $ ,5.2:!:>-, >.'-..c: ::::i Q) of: ~ffi~ c-,~c: c,:;: ~ g (I):;: ()Cii -c II) .5:!"O I- Q) 0 -0 -c (1)::5 =>- -c_ 5~~5Cii$~Et5Q)2~(I)"O~OO~ ~05~~cS~2E~m~2~m~ Qi ~- ~E ~'o..e1ii:H g,g m ~'U.d5'5 -1I)......~O<<lIl)c.c"'CII)"Ou~c:-rr ~J~~8~~~8.~=~~~8i~ E . ~ " ~ ~ c ~ o ~ J! ~ ~~ . c ~ ~ g ~ '61<:: . 0 ~ ~ ~,g . . E-" . ~ ~ ~ ,..: z o ~ ::;; o<:~ -C) Wo lJlo<: ...JlL ~C) -z lL- lJl.... 00<: :I: 0 ...JlL <cW zo<: OC -z C)<c WC) O<:z :)0;: ::>0 0.... W- ::;;z wO ....::;; z o !;i C) ;:: :i] E ~ ~ e "- ~ c ., o ~ . '" ~ c . ~ c 5 ~ c o " c o 1ii & ,~ ]I :; E {!}, ~ ".. u e ~ E .!l 0 ~ u c ~ 0 c ~ ~ '" u '" ~ 'c " :5 > 0> C '" ~ u" ,- u "c .E~ c= 0" ~~ <Cu - c ~ E ~~ ,2:; co> w<c >. u c ~ 0> <C 0> ,5 S '2 o :;; ~ '" ~ .c 0. '" '2 s '2 o :;; ~ ~ '" ~ ~ :;; c o :; '" '" :i! '- i~ :0::: 'c/) ';: ,C') 'C-; ~ ,,:3 i:g iCIJ C ,:;; o u u ;: e .... :'0 iij lQ) E=: ig"fi E :m (tl Q) '::::I ell.. :2.1 g ill ;(0 ia~"EE '<1)'- Q) Q) ~E5EE It~ E~i '_ Eg,!o- :00 Q) en l~OOO o ;~ :a~l::E '$'- Q) Q) ~E5EE !Q) E g.t:::" it Edi ~ ,00> Q) i~() ~ 0 :0 it: ;0 :0 :2 :t) >c :0 ,t) rv ia: '"'0 :c '~ '0 '..0 .c '" iO 'z '" ~ ~.c .c- I,() -ow ""'~.s:::5 2 5 (fj ,g:s oS$: ~ c..~ UJ ctl Q).- $g:;;~E .E.g"'C o..~ ~ l1.. ctl E -C-=o"E ~~l1>'~ U Q) ~ g>tj ~ ~ Q) (0'-= U t513j~2l ,~m-U) t; o_~Q,)r:: 0..-= <!! g> Q) l1..:5lOm~ 05~~~ !!!{/)o.so a~N,5 ~ Q) 'Q) C E .!lzo.c" lll::l +-':J !: & c 1U J!L...: o Q) 5 ~_rJl ~ ~C5 (,) E.2:"o uU5~ f:!t5 0.. ;c ;0 i~~ ,- m i:i!", ~~ ~8 ~N ~ ~ o . :;; ~ w~ w . i .--.,----,--,._.-.,.--._-,-----_._--,-----~----~~~~ I'- ................._..._,.,_..,._,.."._..,^~~~i co c to ...... Q) C/) c~"3 11l.E..c Q) Q) ,- Ctl Q) U ...... Q)~ ~~ ..c~ .cQ)~ "'CQ)Q)m~~ ~m~ _~ :!:::b~E..c$mw ~U)...,. go SEESQ)~u2~ ~~~~c~&"'CQ)~otc~~; (1)2 c'- <<J c c:.9:l:6 Q) C 0 C E c: f!:! Q) ,_::::I 0 m <<I, () "(.) <<l ..... m ,- ::l Q) Q) Ol-C C" Q) c....c Q) (l) c >>:E:' U Q) "'C ;:;':'.c5: Q) ~_.g 5 e~.g ::1::0 ~g'-g'Ci) -uUvmu2WQ)IDoIDcmttlc O~&~~o~~~~~S!ti~8 ~E~~€B~@~oeoev~~ ::1m w"O"'C o+-'"'O ,Ill C.c ID"'C!!:::,!:: ~v~~i~~~~~~~~~&~ ;ig~~Q)g5~~i~~5~~ ~LL.g~~~=';.ffi.8o~=.i-~O ::I"'C':::C'>=:i5..c= Q) ~~ rn m c >_ g ffi ~ fIl en c Q).2 >.~ c.l:: t)'Cij; 0 en III 0 ~ () ,- 5; Q) Q):E! 816 m1:: l!!: C o;Il_U::::l.cQ) '-J::CIl ()a.Q)::::I(1) .-19 w:;;:.o"'(j" co- ctl.c......E u E E e>cn -g m ~ 0 IV 2 ,!:: ~ j >.'-..c. ::I Q) ~~~~~;~~~.5"'Cg!j~i 5~~5~$a.E~i$~~"O~cn~ LL.U5;SEE~2E,~m~2~m~ Qj ~-~"E~'5.e1ii$g,gm~'iijTI'S _1Il_;omwc.c"Ow~o~c-rr ~J~~8~~~8~~~~~8j! E ~ ~ ~ - " o ~ ]!~ 'a.-g . - o . I~ m.S; - - DB rn '2 . 0 ~~ . c , 0 0:;:::; . . E~ ~~ E e ~ e a. ~ c " o a. . '" ~ c . ~ c 'c S '. o " c o ~ ~ ~ " ,..: z o ~ " o:~ -G WO "'0: -'0.. ;5G -z 0..- "'Ii;: 00 "'a.. -'w <0: Zc Qz G< WG O:z <- -,0: ::>0 0.... w- "z wO ...." z o ~ G ;:: :E .. " c ~ ~ ~ o c '0 c o ~ ....,~- ~ ~ ~ :E Cl C :; " .. ,- " "'C .E~ C= Oil. 'ijg <(0 c .. E ~(;' .elii CCl W<( ~ ~ ~ E .. IX: I I I , I I i i ! I-~~-~-^~-~~~-^'~-'--^-'--~----~~^--^i-^~--- rs C .. Cl <( Cl C '~ g " o " .. ~ ~ .c ll. Cl C ~ '2 o " e = Iil .. " ~ ~ ~ g> :E 1i5 N " ll. ~ ..J ,- l~ 10::: 1m I.;; I~ e = Iil .. c " 8 ~ " ~ ~ I'g> ... :E ~- _OE;' 0.. C mmm !g.gg- l ~:e g !'" 010 I~o , i ,~ la z. E c ~'~ ~ ~ Ql E g.~ !: Ed) ~ 00 ij) <l.I ~()ClO U ..c. 0 ~ >-$ oD:::_<I:l.cCL.. ,- C/) '- ...."'C Q).E jc,g.e,!lE>. . - 0 c.. >>.J! ~ (.) ..c. ->.1:"0 u 0..0 C . "5 ~,Q2 ~ E b..~rntl o..s;;;:oOC.oE::I;;;;;Q) (J)....<IJ:::I::IO,_8c'5' mClL!:::~8oQ)o2"" f'-.a.."'C~oc..c._oa. 2~-58'O~2~~~ &1ijm~2~!~uo , 13:!:~ r3'o-E!E,9l..o -g~ ~..c.~ a.8i.g~ ~o.!!~~Q)=u~o c.....c Q) ;5 ttl <<1<( Q) Q)~ g'~~o~Oa;€ 9:(\)OCl)o<(c8tnE Om.cNQ)-<<:lc~O miil-rogwgm(L4= 3lii€a.a:l~c..~cE 0""::J ttl ::I..c.9-tn'- Q) <1l.s; o...J ~o."""'- C)E E ' """ ..c.,- c Q) Q) C (l) ~ g co ~_(Il '-:6.s j2 ~ -'E:g e~g>ui.s'5::1 o~~:50~vo~E ~'5:-- m Q) ::l :5 'i:: C ,- O>~r---:5.coc..(\]~ ^51! ~ ,Q U "g.s '" ~ rG 8 ~.., !::~ c _ .cE Cl~ e~ :50.., "u.'" ~:2g ~::>N ~f- .5 r1J<1>.... .~-E B ~.5 g :ca.s stJ -c l..L. ,g.$ Qj,g ~ - '" a. O"'x Z 0." ~- _oB" o ID c jIDroro '0 (.) c.. i@i! a :~ Q) 0 ;.!:2 () 0 '" 'B.2='cc lV'- Q) Q) EsEE ~ E~1ij ;'55g?g. :~()~Cl :0 '" iB~cE :11)'- Q) Q) :E 5 E E Q) E g.t:: i!:: E 15 ~ 00> Q) !~U~o '-- iO) .... IX: en - o c o 't5 w !~ i:E; :CD i~ ic? .. is lilt i~~ !.::;a.. : c ctI i~ g> it'l:lrn 'OLC i:Elfi ::E a.. ~ ~ M 0 ~ 0 ~ N g '" o ~ ~ ~ ffi .s Q) >.(1) ...c::...c::0>...c:: ..QE~ - u I'- - >"0 Q) J2 6~o:::.scj!!E> (f)$(fJ~ctlQ)Q)u Ol ~ ~ c.g.E 0.. 1.:; 53 ui I'- (I) 0 0.. E l5.O-itjt5 Q) Q) Q)-c (;>0 E::::I:,;::; (I) -lij C <I) C U,_ U C.O' 6..Jl!!t5 ~o <I) gj!! l5. cr: E E 2::::1 c5(5 &.~ Q)::::I::::1t)u......<I) Q) ml-::!cg:;m2.95 m:E-s,8'O ~0..~t5 ~ . ,QH::: Q) Q)'5'E!E,~o ~cr:-g~m a8~.g.?;> Em ::::I(tj~ Q)= (1)(3 E::::Io~:e=~rnc{Q) Q) o.g Q).... (I)......-..c Q:ll11~uo_~~- () >(1) 3: ctI~ 53 u rn ~ rn ~"O~'O Q),2 53€...:= a~:5~~l11R~c"E Q)~ lfi ctI c€..<:t:,~';;Q)E E (l)CHU Q)<I)C Q) ~C'lllij ~'!::55:Q ~ t @"OTI'~~ui.9'S 5 O..c 16 Q).Ih:p ~ ~..QJ:I .?;> U _ a.. .?;>:= ~ 0 >. E (} 8!. ~ m u.s 0 '~@'~ co '0 C '" .; " 'Oc c~ ",u. ~~ IDN ..", -", ~m c - , -s,~gg 6 a~ :5 [.E 'Ou." ~:2..9! ~::> ~ lfil-~ ~...c ,~:5 ~ C),!:: ,~ .!:: C C "00 StdU u...9- 2 ..u- Q)'- UJ -"'~ 0" 0 Z 0." E . ~ " ~ ~ c " o . 1!!&! '0."0 . C o . :r ~ ~~ Ole &! ~ . c , 0 o . ~i ,." !"._.,-'-~'---~--'-"---- I", ra~E"E 1(1).- <I) Q) !E 5 E E !~ E~1i ~_ E Q) 0- 100 iii Q) i~()oO [;~----~-----~1~~---~~- s 's ~ ~ C C o 0 U jU .Ii! ,i! a.. 'a.. i L___~__~___~_____~__~_,~_~, r ~ ~ ui m_-gffi ~'5 ~ 2ll::-a:>!5" lDQlO'5' ~ ec..U_O:)1a:::: B. ~LLEuOo.uOL.. __ l; 0 C E!E.<Llll.l :5:> 8'5:= offi.g:5 ::l~Q)$tL~o(/J~ o .c (Q (1)- <<l -0 (f):Q= u'O'~-::f >. OlOt\1!E;L-CI)OQ):!::: ...... I ..c:: t::" 0._ (l) (/J,C) 0:: ~(/) Q) Q) l:: U ttI Q) rn5i::Ju:5~!ij..c::..c ~ :;:::; <<l (Q_=:J 0.._ ~ ~&o 0 &:g!.E E ~:s lD 8::;!; <(';0 g',g ~gg>&i51~:S:oc o..uti5:::1~""":.93E o-"O~o..~.....oQ) ~ID'- c: w,Q >.(1) rn "''E (/J._..c:: .... c: .... 3.- ~>'Cl15 a.roil u(f)Jg~.s >,2 (; E II) U ::lC,)"O.c c_,_ Eij:co ll.l:S-c alE"~ ~f!:!O.s.c$lllg(ij o~:a;.s ~!i!:i ~~ ~C':lQ)ornE5.tl2 i:3&~'~.e 8.g g 8. ",'" ~ '" c:(f.)..::.::: ..c:: 12-00.. -CI) ctJ <<5~ ill CC ~ 5tiroe~E B ~:5€~:g ~ c. oB'E~;; ~ [ .~ 000.....';:-: E E o..c:: 0) (1)'- CD u.!E......i3 c: ~ :5 i'iS"Oo::--.Q- s:: c~CI)itl E m.Q '~~-g (If ~ g <ii(;3 Ql-cul5$rn .~& :S~mu'=~ (1)0 ~O::B~~.!!! iJ~ 0(/)._.... (1)1) cu."=", o..dl~2:52 -be .s:s~.5..c::1il Ole. ;= ~Q)-g geo :sB ~:aOoeu '~.E o.2~O:::5= <1)'- ,!l1.og'2~~~ ~~ .- ID'" 0 II) __....... o..m>~l;::o ~~ rIl...... <(.... 2 Q) ,- Q) :E 0:: ~ ~ lfij 'e-g "8 ,~ I- CI)...... __.::. a. ctI E"'C 'C C rn '" '" .j!! LL 0, ~~ 5~ ~ ~ :5.2 'C'C ",,,, a~ $~ .!:2 ~ C).~ ,E c 'Co 5U LL2 vii) 05 Zu "02 m"E l5 ID "0 c: c: c: ... to.;::..c:: '5 c: Q) _; (Qll)O~(/Ja.- ~~:511)~: C") E ~ ctI c: ..... ..c ... Ul.....:5 z. c:i , Q) 0 W ~ 0 0).,....: _ E c: ClJ ~ <Ll <1>, ~i!:i~~iW5C~ll)oet)b28 ~ c.~ C:O~:5~~~~i [,~]!2i "O.S e ~:5 0.. 55 w (ij C'lI::;;: ~ E ~ E l!!i C'lI w..... C'lI'O:;;:.= > -g w~:> >.'- ~ ::I(/)!, o...J;:w,Ql:>WW::l>'I::"'Cuw uc'lI ~~~~c~~-w;25555"'C.J;:1 .... ~ 0..:2 ~ 0 ~ ~5 w.!!!: Cl w';:;: ~ '~j S~E~~;~2~EgC'll~"'Cwii U) -g 0.'- >:c w 0.. ~ I:: m :z Jf ~ 2 ~ ....! ~.....E~~~2_C'lIO"'CC'lI~Q)C'lII::Si ..!. Jg'~ C'lI 0 0 &i ~.$ t5.!a ~ 0..CC1 g 8 wi '0 UJ:C ~:r: U (ij g. I:: 2 I:: I:: Q) CI:i'E" w:Oi -~;~~~::l0~U8~~~w~~ U'I ::I .....:;;; I'"'- ::l c).I:: I:: C'lI t UJ (.;I.c '-i (II UJ C'lI:> 0'" <1.1 Q) <1.1 0 C)<I.I '5 Q)..... .$ :!:: ~~9Q)~Q)~.I::~u~goEou~1 '" EE Cl_ ....~o::: o...E'e::l I::~ E !::l! to- I:: fa 0 1" I:: 0 E Q) Q) Q) ttl _ ttl E-o! 0::: 0 0.1::..... (") I:: >..-.c.l::.I:: >. 0 (.;1._ I::i ~~te55~~g&S~~~b&&~: 1::~;= ~ ~ -g ~ ! fa -g ~ Q) lo &i fij &i! Q).- ;:;:.- Q) C'lI 0 ::l .I:: ..... _ UJ 0 (!).I:: .I:: Ui e E 1" ~ II) CO') Q; S e ~ ~ 16 0..:5 e e ~i ~Q)CO')_UJMIDOQ)o..Q)UQ).....Q)Q)~ ~~~S~~5S~~~!5g~~~< '" ittl - :5 ,- 0 (;' rn '0 '" c u '" ;Q)m rn '5 u ,U U 0.. .= c :fij~ a ,!!! ~ tI: u " 'is. !UJ <1.10 ...: 0 E ;.!a U '" u 0 Z <I: 0 0 ~ 1;- :;; ittl il! " i~ ..... '" !:d~55~ a: '" iii Cl <I: ~ESEE 0 '" i~ E~~ m a: '2 t'5 ~ ~ g. ...J II. !l i:! bOQ)C1 Cl '2 ,- " ii: z 0 iu m ~ ::;; 0 :J: 0 ...J II. :l!! <( w !5bcc a: z Q C iQ).C ~ Q) 0 iE ::l o..E 5 z '" i~ E..Q~ <( E _EQ)o.. W '" " '00> Q) '" Cl ~ U bOQ)C1 Z .g " .'_ CI :S '" ii! " '" iU ::> 0 w <I: U .... w Z :;; 0 '" il:: m ,0 W :;; m ,0 .... '" Z D. :2 0 '" 1;; ~ c c ';: ,0 !l iU Cl '2 :~ ;:: 0 ilL :ii ::;; :-0 : a::: I:: :.1::$ "'(9 E", I{J)....."'C ;.1:: I::C'lI ,,~ 0 i:a 8lr iQ) C'lI E !~~i . '" 0 i- a: ~ Ii:. i~{J):;;: ~ ia::: w- e 'E :m ~ ~ 0 ~ ir;:.~ it . 0: if')UJ ~ '..;~~ c ~ i~~€ rn ~ ~ c m :lQ~~ 'e rn " '" 'CD._ '0 ::;; c ::5:55;;; 0 '" " 0 il:: > l"- e 0 u :'~::: cc:: 0 :; u 'lOm(/) ~ '" ;: i.2Jto- >; ~ '" e i=a:::~ ~ i " l- i:!(/) ~ro ~o ~o ~N ~ ~ o . ~ ~ UP W '" E . ~ . ~ ~ e E o ~ - . Jl'" ~u . e o . :r~ ~~ tn.;: . 0 "''' . e ~,g . . E" 4)'= ,." E ~ ~ e "- ~ c " o ~ . '" ~ c . ~ c ." .9 .c o " e ,Q ;; ~ - " ,..: Z o ~ :;; ..:;I! -C) Wo Ul..: ...J11. ;:C) -Z 11.- Ull;2 00 "11. ...JW <l:..: Zc QZ C)<l: WC) ..:z :3ii: ::>0 01- W- :;;Z wO 1-:;; Z o ~ C) ;:: :ii ~ - m E " a: " u c ~ a ~ o c '0 c o B Ul !E ~ ~ :E i ~m___ 1 I L , , 1 I I "",.,",.,""',.,',...'.'1 I ._.._" .~ I I I I I ~ . M 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 . , << e "' -'l w Cl ,5 10 u " -u ""c .5.. g=a ~5 <(0 I I I r-~----. i ~ i;' c " Cl <( Cl '2 .s '" o " I 1'._-' I I I.... I I I ~m~_ ! u;> i I'U ~ , g' (") 1-0 ~ ~ ,~ (.) (tl I's G) c.. 10' 0. E ~ 'C - Iv c 5 ti ,~ ~ ~.~ I"' c ="' c Cb (1):2 ,2 .! ~-;; Ii ~ It 105 .... Co c I 5i ~~ o t:: .... >. Cl= ~ ~,,; ~~~~ :e b)~ Q.l I ~ 10> CLI C\li..c~ I- ClJD..I-C'? : : ! I ....'.'----1 I ! 1 ,..,....,.....,...__.._._.._.._--~......."j ! , I I ~'5(; :~* 1ij d.J (j c. !f6~ 5 :;J l3>ou i.!!2 () 'm iBz..Ec leD'c E 11) ,E ::I c. E i~ E.Q ffi :..... E Q) C. ,00> Q) :~() ~ 0 1<3 c " E ~~ .e5i c," W<( " "' .. "" 0. Cl c '~ .s c o :;; e " ill .. :;; c .s 10 g iiii c " " = ~ ~ " .... "'",,' mcncu~ 0)..... 0 M C >-" t) ClS tlSG)>Q. ~.g,SE l1..- U) '- c:J::s!.E ~i::j~~ ~..'l:_ i&~~ .Q as ::l 311:5 m:!:::lJl,-C'll ....-,,::la. >.~c~E I'U ... I'U <1.1'- ::':"'C E.!!l .c 0:=; I'U c..c BJ-c: 0 0; :I:cD::~_ .... ~s ~~ c:: (0'-'-'- ~~~H bh..jijQ)O ~::E~~ '" '3 >,C- :;E:=:vID iE sEE : Q,) E 8"1:: it: Edi ~ :005; Q) ~~OOCl iu c '.s:! it) :2 ;1ij :5 '0 i~ '" :'5 o !OO f iai ,0.. " Cl C .. '" u '(l) in. I'? if') ic? f ,::I ; III iCU " " 'c '00) i:;r--. 'mO:: ii~ -- _ 0--: Q) CD Q) ~ 2~]n~ :5 (tl Q) (tl'~c..t;::: E ........c..c~ e E'- 0 ...... a. =ffi 1:: c. o"ffi ./:: ~ I ..c Q) lD U 0 c: ~ $! Cf.I~ u:5 'iij <- 0.0 ~..c c. ~ c lU m.E N .~ ~ <e 'a; ';;-= U>"In._Q)..cc.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C):5 -:0 1: ....~_u.5 ~.s'Sjg .E m 5 Q);g lU o~ 8.. . 0.. 0.. O..c E ..c'C >. 0 In (3 ca g~ >.15 ~1ij-~ ca :?<e- c >.-.... 1)...... "3 ca I/) 0 <U~ m.E.~e U..c ~.;:: 0"0 E >.~ 0. E ~ 0 0._ '* lU g ~ v lU9-S-g ~o..i; <u<(":5 I- ~ ~ 1i) 1ij E a.. @"- ~ '5~.go..g-8,;; g ~ 0 ~~o.. ~ ge Q)'::~~ OlUlooc.soo..o o ~ .... C'~ 0 01/)15 t5~ lU'-~ E c lij g> ^~ .~ :B -:0..::.::,;::0 s: ..cclUl-...._ g>:::l~m2~ o lL. 0 C) ca .Eu.i~lijS-g -CO_ca- "'C o?......_:::l .=tsc:::.~ E~ .s~oo.~"fi ~:ou.. Em I/) -..c <-: E! o,~ :ge~~~5 ~~~c:gts '~';'!:!: >or;. 2 1:5..0 ~ <;; lU ~ -s,..c -g 5 '[m :::l,~ttI 0 Coo.. e J: ~"O .~ ttI:5 -g.Q lij T'" f=. :?-g ttI ~ Cia Qj~ :;~E,5C\l _Uucc-g-c ~~~~8.alij E . ~ o ~ ~ - " o ~ s.l' '0.'0 . - o . :r ~ "m-€ ~,g ~- . 0 ~ ~ . - , 0 o ~ . . ~~ >-~ ,..: z o ~ :;; ..:il! -0 Wo "'..: ..Jll. ~o -z ll.- ",I- 0": :1:0 ..Jll. <W z": 00 -z 0< Wo ":z :312 =>0 01- W- :;;z wO 1-:;; z o ~ o ;:: :!i E ~ ~ 2 a. ~ c " o ~ . '" ~ c . ~ C 'C " ." o '" c o ~ ~ " ~ ~ c :.m E ~ o 'Iii <> C '0 c ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ :5 '" C ~ ~ ~ ,- ~ "'C .=.. C= oc. t;8 <<> - C " E ~~ .2~ .:i~ I I I m, ~ ~ M 0 ~ 0 ~ N i 0 " N I. 0 ~ <: < . oo~ w """""',.,"',' I 1 ----_._---~---_._--, ~ I :E ID ij ~~~ ;Q) Ig-5 E ~ ~Il Ihumm_-lmm ... tE~~ !tE~'~ :00><1.) '00>(1) i-U <1l0 1,-....0 IDa '."" 0 I"" 0 !u U I . I~ I~fii ID E g.t !:E-a;tO 10 0 ii; g. I~OOCl ,() I '.'--i.----.--.~-... I,~ ti ~ ,~ r~ !8 I~ '-,..,'-,.._--'------'-----,..,-'1:' - ~ ~E_ ~ 50 5 ~ ~"O ~ '5 oS! ~ ~ _~.s i5 0 ~~~ g~o IDmE~ID W ~ a:l~5Cll mUl:;:::: :t:2I1lffi.c I>' ::I ~~~~ s~~~;~I~~ II ~~ .... ,- m:2"'C ~1ij E rJ ,<1) c.w:;:::: (j) ! '- Q) U (tl=c:_c=- <.;;;;ooQ)CI:l- 1(0 I-I1l II) m o'~ m:C 5 ~ ,- .... o.t:"5 (,) ta... E ~-~ Q)m~~~~-~E~ ~ ~Q) ::I~Q)iCfjQ)uE~~iQ)::IX S >.~ ~o~1ij::l5m~'-.t:->oQ) to ~o Q):;::::~"'C~Q)c:Es~~IQ)~ ~ u>, E~ooEm"'C~Q)Q)Jc.o5c: Q) ~~ ~:;:::: -~~E"'C_X.t:c:~ ~ ~u ,~~'5 E ~~:g ~'5~ ~ Q)~v 0 '5 >. -u"'Co-....a:lU)OIDC:OIDa _ ~c: ~ m8~a.'-(I)c..'::o'~""E . l!:!~ E5gmxCfjS:2~oUQ)~o M >.0 E a. ~ l1l W a: >.- ~ ~ Q) en'iij u Ie-> ro OJ:'d _ ::J (/J.c :>.:;;;; I.'!I 0> (I) E (f,I _ c: Q) , e c.. 0 E mm~C:C'lI'5::>cUJ'_vooU) ,:::I ;:::c.... c..c.::Ictl;s:c:_omu-C/')o::J 'CD rnttlw ,Q_CfjO_o~~c..E~~_~ ~ ~~~ ~"Om~oo~~~<<I~>g~~ ~m _w- ~~~EEE~E~~~~~~3 ~~ ~~~ m~ ~~~_~~~~$~~2 ct o~E o~cE~EmE~>_~~E~ o~ =o~ z-g~~~c~~~~S~~5 ~~ ~~~ di.E ~ e:E -m ~ e ~:; E a. ~ ,!Q c ~.Ql m a. e - Q)~ o.,~ >~ a. E O>~ 0.:5'- ~:c ~ ~ 0 ~~~~I~i~~a$~~~~ i~ ~j~ ~ ~ E ~ >. ~ C ~ '" <( '" ,5 B '2 o :;; :<<1 ;"'5 >,C- :~ ~ Q) ~ 'E sEE !~ E~@ '5~~fr ~u~o i,_ 0 () ~ o .. .c a. '" '2 B '2 o :;; 'C :,Q ;0 i~ :c ,0 :0 ~ :0: ,~ :0 :E !,g ~ ~ o ~ ~ :;; C o ~ ! iii !"'C ;<<1 '0 ~o::: :((l ~:c ,m '" '(0 "'0> ,Oi~ !~ ~ :M 3 :l!!-5, ! ~:f :~ 0 :~- C ~::E i 8 !~~ ~ il~ I- !:!! (L , , , , , , I J I I I I I -I I """"""-,,,,--1 1 ~ ~ c "'C.E5E .!:2 $~g c~'_ Q) .o~m .!!!,_~20~> ~ 'w t;;;; :; 0>:6"'5 1I)!i= c.!!l ~ ;; m:goQ)C((l~~~((l~"OEc ~ Q)'o:5~ Q)"{; Q)-.s::o c:;:::': Q)"'C c'-~ ~C<<l~~<<l ~=a;:Eill-a;:5,2 Q)am:E..... ~(ij 5::;-:~ 5'512 ~~;1::::: g Q):j;;'->c.;:a;ec:::l~o~rn- 5 0 liP"O Q) 0 ~ 0 E U) m m ~ Q) ~ 5'::* ~~i~ aaJrn g;'~~ Q):;:::~~Q) ~CEoQ)mm- E~oOU)~.2Q)mQ,)~Ec"? a.:;::: E U) 0 ~ E U It:: ~ m .;:!:: aE:OE:2;e<<lQ)!Em2i2Q)0 :;:::: 8~ 0--0 3:c.C"O 0 ~,2 2i ~c ~ 8 g>a'O.E'~'~.Ew12 ~ :Boc<<l.QU_ ,~e"'CQ):::I~ E g.ur.8 ~E~-E!.2~2:: ~'~ a;1iiQ)c<<l~~Q)Q,)(ij~Q)(Jo c~5<<J3:a.{ijE:Q~0.><U~ ,Q-~(J""ocQ)>:-x!P~~ ~o <<l ~ 0- 0 > l?::: <u:;- a. ~ m Q)E E E g;! :B l? 0._ II) ~.!: E <<l - ~ 0) Q,) -0 0.= Q,) C "'C 0 o~ a E'c"'Ci,5'3~g ~ 2:! ~ z ~:;:::: ~ g~ 2:! E gj"O ~ '2: -8 ~ di - ~ l?:;:::: m '5'~ m m e! ~ '(jj: ~ ~ "0 <u:;::; o.,~ .~ ..." E ~ ~ e a. ~ c " o ~ . '" ~ e . ~ e 'e .8 '" o " e o ~ ~ " ...: z o ~ :;; o::~ -Cl Wo (1)0:: ....... ;5Cl -z ..- (1)1- 00:: J:O ....... <(w zO:: 00 -z Cl<( WCl O::z <(- .....0:: ~O 01- w- :;;z wO 1-:;; z o ~ Cl i= ~ '" U C ~ E '" o 'Iii o c '0 C ,2 'd 0 t;:: ;! ~ :E 0> :S . U '" ,- U 'C C .E. C= o Q, -E ~O <1:0 ~ C '" E ~~ .2ai CO> w<l: ~ ~ E &1 ~ ~ ;:!: ~ ;<: ~ o ~ ;:j~ W ! , t ~ "--- ~ Q) (1) c !um en 11ij ~ g- ~ 1:: 8 .!!!~o ,., U C '" 0> <I: 0> ,E .s '2 o " I", r~~E"E !<1)'- Q) Q) E 5 E'E I~E~ffi _Eva. 00 a'i Q) ~OClO jO t I", I~~EE '0>'- Q) Q) Iw 5 [E I-Eo"t::: _ Ev> [ 00 '" >,() Q) 0 :::: 0 U '" ~ '" o . .c 0. 0> '2 B '2 o :;; r--- ,,., 'U Ic '" Q, ~ u u <:( i'! 0. i! = o . '" :;; C ,2 'Iii ~ iiii "'- 0 :sam _IDJ::c: ~~~'~ g"50,!; 1\:100)32 Q>0-c>:5'5 :Sg~li>~ ~ O'S161ij ~.s.c=L.. C'" >'cS 1ll,2ffi :J >. o 0._"C g J- OIDttI .. ~ >.E a. ..........OE::J ~~ffiQ;8 MEg-a.~ l!!88~o ,; ~ o~o~ mCOClCu Q) IJ) ,E 16 q::: :E~;g.c~ gEE~o<c '-lll-- <0_ 'Iii o>.s 0)"'0 Q) C)...... '5. III Q) r/l ;::; 0. (f.I rn ::J ttI i,E~ii,~if E . m " ~ m e " o ~ ~~ ~~ . c ~ ~ ~ ~ '01<: . 0 '" ~ . c B ,2 . " E!2 ~:E ... C o u u ~ I- RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO REMOVE EIGHT SUBJECT PARCELS FROM THE Z "FUTURE SPECIFIC PLAN" OVERLAY DESIGNATION AND CORRESPONDING TWO STORY HEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR A SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findinqs, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc, ("UHS"), filed Planning Application Nos, PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959- 080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), B, The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, C, On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D, The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. E, On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. F, A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8, 2005, G, On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. H, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-001 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-002, recommending approval of a General Plan Amendment (PA04-0462), J, On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final Environmental Impact Report, K, On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS, PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT), PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35,31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S), 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )," L, On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the General Plan Amendment at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. M, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-06, approving the General Plan Amendment (PA04-0462), N, Two lawsuits were timely filed seeking to set aside the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the Project by the City Council of the City of Temecula, The lawsuit filed by Petitioners California Nurses Association (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445394) was filed on February 24, 2006, The second suit, by Petitioners Citizens Against Noise and Traffic (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445411), was filed on February 24, 2006, 0, On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court (hereafter, the "Court") ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, and its certification of the Final EIR, In its Order, the Court concluded that the EIR failed to adequately address construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts and mitigation measures for traffic impacts, and did not address potential impacts from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plumes potentially generated by three gas stations in the vicinity that might have the potential to migrate under the site, contaminate the soil on the site and generate unhealthful gas vapors, p, The Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency, All other aspects of the Final EIR were unchallenged during the challenge period, and thus are presumed to be adequate along with those aspects specifically upheld by the Court, Q, On July 12, 2007, a scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Draft SEIR") for the Project. R, In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007, S, On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Nos, PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan) and PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. T, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. U, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-02, recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment (PA07-0198), V, On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its approvals of Planning Application Nos, PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05- 0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010, W, On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the General Plan Amendment (PA07 -0198) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. X, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 08- , entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07- 0202, PA07 -0200 and PA07 -0201 )," y, All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, Section 2. Further Findinqs, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following findings: A. The amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan, The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan encourage "A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses (Goal 1 )," "A City of diversified development character, where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development (Goal 3)," and "A City compatible and coordinated with regional land use and transportation patterns (Goal 8)," The Project provides a regional use that is needed in the community and surrounding region, There is currently a lack of medical treatment facilities in the community capable of providing adequate medical care for the general population, The Project integrates public medical facilities necessary for the demand of the current and future population, The Project is situated adjacent to residential uses and a state highway, The Project has been designed to mitigate various potentially significant impacts via an environmental assessment in which circulation, noise, light and glare, biological and air quality has been reviewed and conditions of approval have been imposed so the Project can co-exist with the surrounding rural residential area, The Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Professional Office (PO) designation, which allows low and mid rise structures that provide uses such as community facilities, In addition, the Project is consistent with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of proposed use, The Project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), B, The amendment will not have a significant impact on the character of the surrounding area, The amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures, The Project allowed by the amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and as designed and conditioned the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because there was an initial study prepared, which identified potentially significant environmental impacts and a mitigation monitoring program was adopted that mitigates potentially significant impacts such as traffic, air quality, noise, light and glare, and biological to a less than significant level. For example, access points have been designed to reduce the amount of traffic leaving the Project site towards residential areas by eliminating left turn options and focusing the primary access points along the state highway, Additional landscaping and berming are included in the conditions of approval to screen the height and reduce noise, The tallest buildings were relocated closer to the state highway, away from the residential area to reduce the appearance of height; this will also reduce the noise from the emergency room area, There are conditions in place requiring helicopters arriving and leaving the Project site to utilize commercial and state highway corridors rather than residential areas, Emergency vehicles are required to turn off sirens upon entry to the project site, and sirens may only be used in emergency situations, The Project is a conditionally permitted use as has been designed and conditioned (including mitigation measures) in a manner that will reduce any potentially significant impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, The building and the site are designed to respect the surrounding area and uses and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures, C, The nature of the Project allowed by the amendment is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, The Project is a 320-bed hospital and a helipad, The nature of this use, as conditioned, is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the Project is providing a service that is needed in the community and region and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the surrounding community, The Project will actually contribute to the long term viability and longevity of the community by providing additional medical care facilities, In addition, prior to the issuance of any building permit, the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) as well as the City of Temecula Building Department and Fire Department will review the construction plans for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code, D, The heliport is consistent with the requirements described in subsection 2 and 3 of Section 17,10,020,P of the Temecula Development Code, The proposed helipad facility is consistent with the requirements described in Section 17,10,020,P of the City of Temecula Development Code, including setbacks from parks, school and residentially zoned parcels, Section 3. Amendments to the General Plan Text, The City Council hereby amends the Land Use Element of the General Plan to remove eight subject parcels from the Z "Future Specific Plan" overlay designation and corresponding two-story height restriction for a site located on the north side Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, generally known as Assessor Parcel Numbers 959- 080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (Amending Figure LU-4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A, Existing General Plan; Exhibit B Proposed General Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.) Section 4. Severability, The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Resolution are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution, Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2008, Michael S, Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W, Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No, 08-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS Susan Jones, MMC City Clerk <lll.f} ,~& 2~h)~~l l. 1\ N D LI S r-. Land Use Exhibit A - Existing Figure lU-4 Specific Plan Areas CITY OF TEMECUl.A GENERAL. PLAN Appro'led Speclflc Plans ::;....l~~H... 5/'-:;Z ~anchO~ sp. 3 "'arg.vll.V~"'" SP. 4 PelQnl.i'PllMO D64 Sol SI'. !l OW lDom sP. 6 C"'poa VllfdM St-'. 7 T~ RogoONl ClM'lor ::iP' 0 ......1t~...:M01d Town 51-'.9 R.......' SpotO V..Rotn(tl Sp.\l R~Rard'l SP.\2 ~Cf'" lOP.lJ ~on pnO-l.l~~V"J90 POO'!lRlWldlo~ . "100 DU~VMag.t "84 RMlCllOOtIlallV>J1.8 12'3 '/h1chIlol.,ProperI*JJ$,:.......hawl< .:;on!> BoftlAirp.ri. 12f1.l OUlnllDoI.-oo 11I286 ....."",,...10. 1&00 "2~C<<NtnVa!ley~ _313 .MoI'glWlH" ~: 1\,\ ~If // // / -- ..------ _.-- .----0 -- "-'.~~ _.......~"t~__ ____-- O~...---'- Futur. Specific Plans ~ ,....-_," ..... Y SptoflcP*"A1NY /' /""" '-r~ ~ .. 'j, ------ -,- .------ ylJ\SJl.,..'{~INE.Q ------ T..MOoMI C,1y IJ~ ____I $p'lofeof .....-....en:.8otrdIwy _ PbnrQAlN ~ ,_....Gi6~~~....."- '- . \ 'iJ, " . 'i 1>> .. ), ,< 1 ----- -- --} RO ..___' ____--;eMECu...' .___ ___---- w-p.!:-_----- --- --_.....--- N W*EO S 250 .......... ---OiMil~~::-=-:-.--) ,--------"'--- ~:L'/ __ ' y ','} I (, r \\ [' ( II 1.\ " I' \ ~ 1\ ,\ l 111,1,';' ''1::'];;) ,'}o~~< t-ji;'€ '\ I ~~J;"ii L ,.\ N D u S F. Land Use Exhibit B - Proposed Figure LU-4 Specific Plan Areas "'------=: }; '/ c CITY OF TfMECULA GENERAL PLAN Approved Specific Plans SP. 1 R~ H.b SP.2~~ SP.3 "'-9*"riV~ sp. ~ p~_ 0.1 SOl SP.S (ltdTawr'l SP.15 C*"JlOS~ SPA 7 T8ITMIC\IY ReglONl tAtter sp.s Y,lnl~41IOldrtMn sp. 9 R~ SP.1D YaA RMld'l SP-"R~AW'(.h SP-12 Waite,... SP,t3 Haw.1Otl PDQ-. TIlrllJlWa Cleek V bgI P0i)..5~P~la .105 o.AdlvlLlQtl . 104 RIIUX~ 8m Voala 11213 Wn:tem.rProplt1.II'S~ "266 II<<"~ .2IM ~Oa~ "266 Ylrd"4t1.., 1&00 III 238 CIOW!\ V.aey W.JgCl 11313 MofQarlH~1 Fuhn8 SpEtciflc Plans v z --- ----- ----- ---- N \\'-$EO S 250 >--< o--t l y ,'. (, T r , [, ..\ \\ II I;, ,\ L " I' 1'-\ ill)..; Executive Summary Potential Environmental Impact level of Impact after Mitigation Mitigation Measures improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way. Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements along this segment. Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future. Impact 3,3-10: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 Mitigation Measure 3,3-10: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit. Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way along this segment. Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements. Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future. To ensure the improvements are completed prior to occupancy of the hospital building, occupancy of any building outside of Phase IA shall not be permitted until after the City has issued a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA. Significant and unavoidable. Temecula Regional Hospital Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 5,19 ESA I 0207434 October 2007 3. Environmental SettinQ, Impacts, and MitiQation Measures 3.3 Traffic Mitigation Measure 3,3,9: Margarita Road from De Portola Road to Highway 79 Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements along this segment. Implementation ofthe Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, Mitigation Measure 3,3,10: Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit, Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the right of way along this segment, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements, Implementation ofthe Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, To ensure the improvements are completed prior to occupancy ofthe hospital building, occupancy of any building outside of Phase IA shall not be permitted until after the City has issued a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase lA, No additional mitigation measures, beyond those identified in this section, are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements, CEQA requires that a lead agency shall neither approve nor implement a project as proposed unless the significant environmental effects ofthat project have been reduced to a less-than-significant level, essentially "eliminating, avoiding, or substantially lessening" the expected impact. As with the underlying environmental documents, ifthe lead agency approves the project despite residual significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level, the agency must state the reasons for its action in writing, This "Statement of Overriding Considerations" must be included in the record of project approval. Resulting Levels of Service following implementation of all available mitigation measures for all project area intersection and roadway segments are shown in Tables 3,3,16 and 3,3,17 respectively, As seen in Tables 3,3-16 and 3.3-17, all ofthe identified segments and intersections, with the exception of Route 79 South /I-15 Northbound ramps (AM) and the Route 79 South /Country Glenn Way (AM) intersection will continue to operate at unacceptable levels of service, following completion of all feasible mitigation measures, although the mitigation will Temecula Regional Hospital Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 3,3,51 ESA/0207434 October 2007 3. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 3.3 Traffic in most cases substantially decrease the amount of delay that would otherwise be experienced, These cumulative traffic impacts are considered significant unavoidable adverse impacts, until such time as the Eastern Bypass is constructed, which would provide substantial reliefto the regional circulation system, Appendix D ofthis SEIR (Appendix N ofthe LLG study) contains the Existing + Project + Cumulative Projects analysis with the implementation of all mitigation measures, TABLE 3,3-16 EXISTING + PROJECT + CUMULATIVE INTERSECTION OPERATIONS WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION MEASURES Control Peak Without Mitigation With Mitigation 3. Intersection Type Hour Delayb LOSc Delayb LOSc 1, Highway 79/1-15 SB Ramps Signal AM 121,9 F 84,5 F PM 224,3 F 160,9 F 2, Highway 79/1-15 NB Ramps Signal AM 80,9 F 19,0 B PM 298,2 F 70.4 E 3, Highway 79/ La Paz St Signal AM 163,6 F 40.7 D PM 318,5 F 86,9 F 4, Highway 79/ Pechanga Pkwy Signal AM 125,0 F 112,5 F PM 517,2 F 365,6 F 5, Highway 79/ Jedediah Smith Rd Signal PM 123,5 F 75,3 E 6, Highway 79/ Avenida De Missiones Signal PM 95,0 F 60,6 E 7, Highway 79/ Country Glen Wy Signal AM 77.3 E 15,7 B PM 244,6 F 131,5 F 8. Highway 79/ Redhawk Pkwy / Margarita Rd Signal AM 178,0 F 142,5 F PM 264,0 F 212,5 F Footnotes: a. Mitigation does not include the planned Eastern By-Pass. b. Highway Capacity Manual average delay in seconds per vehicle c. Level of service SOURCE: Linscott Law and Greenspan, Temecula Regional Hospital Traffic Impact Report, 2007. Temecula Regional Hospital Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 3,3,52 ESA/0207434 October 2007 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL SEIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM(CONT,) Mitigation Measure Monitoring Phase Enforcement Agency Action Indicating Monitoring Agency Compliance Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remarks Traffic cont. Mitigation Measure 3,3-9: Margarita Road from De Pre-Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula None Feasible Portola Road to Highway 79 Community Community Development Development Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible Department Department due to the fact that upon completion of all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way. Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements along this segment. Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, hawever the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future. Temecula Regional Hospital Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 11 ESA/D207434 January 2008 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL SEIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM(CONT,) Mitigation Measure Monitoring Phase Enforcement Agency Action Indicating Monitoring Agency Compliance Verification of Compliance Initials Date Remarks Traffic cont. Mitigation Measure 3,3-10: Redhawk Parkway South Pre-Construction City of Temecula City of Temecula Issuance of of Highway 79 Community Community Encroachment Development Development Permit The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF Department Department fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit. Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way along this segment. Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements. Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future. To ensure the improvements are completed prior to occupancy of the hospital building, occupancy of any building outside of Phase IA shall not be permitted until after the City has issued a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA. Temecula Regional Hospital Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 12 ESA/D207434 January 2008 Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements along this segment. Implementation ofthe Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, q. Redhawk Parkway South of Highway 79 The applicant shall pay required City of Temecula DIF fees prior to issuance of any City of Temecula encroachment permit. Note: No additional mitigation measures are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the right of way along this segment, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements, Implementation of the Eastern Bypass will provide for significant cumulative traffic impact relief with all project affected segments and intersections expected to operate at acceptable levels of service, however the Eastern Bypass was not considered in the cumulative analysis at this time because completion is expected to be too far in the future, To ensure the improvements are completed prior to occupancy of the hospital building, occupancy of any building outside of Phase IA shall not be permitted until after the City has issued a certificate of occupancy for any building in Phase IA. No additional mitigation measures, beyond those identified in this section, are feasible due to the fact that upon completion off all identified mitigation measures, no additional regional circulation improvements can be accommodated within the existing right of way, Existing land use and development conditions preclude the ability to acquire additional right of way for additional circulation system improvements, CEQA requires that a lead agency shall neither approve nor implement a project as proposed unless the significant environmental effects of that project have been reduced to a less-than-significant level, essentially "eliminating, avoiding, or substantially lessening" the expected impact. As with the underlying environmental documents, if the lead agency approves the project despite residual significant adverse impacts that cannot be mitigated to a less-than-significant level, the agency must state the reasons for its action in writing, This "Statement of Overriding Considerations" must be included in the record of project approval. 50 ) LLG Ref. 3-07-1752 Temecula Hospital N:\1752\Report\1752 Report.doc lINSOJTT, LAW & GREENSPAN, engineers ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-8) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY-9 (PDO-9) AND ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.200 THROUGH 17.22.206, TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A SITE GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-08-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0199), AND RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 06-01 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Procedural Findinqs, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc, ("UHS"), filed Planning Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 70 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), B, The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, C, On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D, The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. E, On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. F, A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8, 2005, G, On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. H, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-03, recommending that the City Council approve a Zone Change to amend the land use designation from Professional Office and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9) and adopt Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206, including the PDO text and development standards for property generally located north of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (PA05- 0302), J, On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final Environmental Impact Report, K, On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT), PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35,31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )," L, On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Zone Change at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. M, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Ordinance No, 06-01, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula from Professional Office (PO) and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Planned Development Overlay-9 (PDO-9) and adding Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206, to the Temecula Municipal Code (PA05-0302), N, Two lawsuits were timely filed seeking to set aside the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the Project by the City Council of the City of Temecula, The lawsuit filed by Petitioners California Nurses Association (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445394) was filed on February 24, 2006, The second suit, by Petitioners Citizens Against Noise and Traffic (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445411), was filed on February 24, 2006, 0, On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court (hereafter, the "Court") ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, and its certification of the Final EIR, In its Order, the Court concluded that the EIR failed to adequately address construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts and mitigation measures for traffic impacts, and did not address potential impacts from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plumes potentially generated by three gas stations in the vicinity that might have the potential to migrate under the site, contaminate the soil on the site and generate unhealthful gas vapors, p, The Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency, All other aspects of the Final EIR were unchallenged during the challenge period, and thus are presumed to be adequate along with those aspects specifically upheld by the Court, Q, On July 12, 2007, a scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Draft SEIR") for the Project. R, In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007, S, On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Numbers PA07 -0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07 -0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan) and PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080- 007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. T, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. U, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-03, recommending that the City Council approve a Zone Change to amend the land use designation from Professional Office and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9) and adopt Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206, including the PDO text and development standards for property generally located north of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959- 080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (PA07-0199), V, On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its approvals of Planning Application Nos, PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA04- 0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010, W, On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Zone Change (PA07 -0199) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. X, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 08- , entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07- 0202, PA07 -0200, and PA07 -0201 )," y, The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the proposed land use designation for the General Plan and the related General Plan text amendment. The PDO text, as proposed is also consistent with the General Plan and related General Plan Amendment Z, All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, Section 2, Rescission of Prior Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby rescinds its approval of Ordinance No, 06-01, amending the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula from Professional Office (PO) and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Planned Development Overlay-9 (PDO-9) and adding Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206, to the Temecula Municipal Code (PA05-0302), Section 3, Zone Chanqe, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City of Temecula by changing the zoning designation from Professional Office (PO) and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9) for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, and specifically known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 (Amending the official Zoning Map as shown on Exhibit A, Existing Zoning; Exhibit B Proposed Zoning attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full), Section 4, Zone Text Amendment, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adds Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206 to read as follows: "TEMECULA HOSPITAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.200 TITLE. Sections 17,22,200 through 17,22,206 shall be known as "PDO-9" (Temecula Hospital Planned Overlay District), 17.22.202 PURPOSE AND INTENT. The Temecula Hospital planned development overlay district is intended to provide for design flexibility with regards to the building height of hospital projects, Other aspects of this PDO will be consistent with the land use designations that are described in the land use element of the Temecula general plan, 17.22.204 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17,22,206, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area: 1, The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to any development in a Professional Office zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete, 2, The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete, 3, The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in effect at the time the application is deemed complete, 4, Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time the application is deemed complete, 17.22.206 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The development standards set forth in Chapter 17,08 apply to this PDO with the exception of the following modification to allowable building heights, The maximum allowable building heights, as defined in Chapter 17,34 for hospital buildings in the Temecula Hospital PDO District shall be limited as follows: No more than 30% of the total roof area of the hospital building may exceed the 75-foot building height limit. The maximum building height for those portions of the hospital building within the 30% area may not exceed 115 feet. For the purposes of this PDO, roof area is defined as that portion of the roof above occupied conditioned spaces bound by the inside face of the parapet wall that defines the roof area," Section 5, Severability, If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance, The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance, Section 6, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008, Michael S, Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W, Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W, Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No, 08-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _th day of January, 2008 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _th day of January, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W, Jones, MMC City Clerk Zonrna _ tua.4. R...,..., (I1H) [J@v.vlJhlrOlI\lJ't~"(lfl) _l_c.-ptR"'''''(l''' _ ~o.rw,A..o.""(l.'Z) G:::J l40r M~..., 0......, R....-...J tlM) _ \6td.""OM." Re..... 1lI} _K9Ilo.u~R"""".(H) _ """' R...o.rMltRA) _..~COtmwt.lIIltlC) _OCl/"......,.,C--~IIc<:1 _~,.,._'CQor~..(Nr) _s..-.c~ISq _l'foIM._~Ol'I..lPOI mo..-n...P1r\tBP) Gll..oiilhll....~ (UJ ~Plbcm..liONIltPl) CI 0,... SpoK.(08) _~CPn"RIUe.IIOI"(PN') _co.-r.~(Os.c) lZJ~o....pMl'1Io-..a., _$pedoc:pt"18P}~ a$p.cAc:""...Appfoo" I!'I!Jr.....r..ndon -~ SP-4 \If.&\oOI'D """,""~O-6 SP-9 Zone Change Exhibit A - Exislina ........ -'0y- " I Zoning _ H...cteR...-I"-' thRJ e:;] \olIwy low DeMItr R.~. (Ir'\J _l(Mloentlt1R........lL.,) _LD-oe""~R~{L4) ~ ~~~otAo.n.,.,R....."'r(tMJ _~.,.,..~PlI......t'M) _ 1-t\1l o.n..., R...,.... tift _RooBl".......llRR) _NItiQtIr>>~Cal'l'l'ne'C...(NCI _c;o,......,,~C~{CC) _~.yfJ"Olo"'tc--a.(HfJ _ sw..-C--ltI'l(6C1 _Pro/In.O\II01!ClItPOJ Dl 0.-....... (op) c::JUgNln&.o.....(IJ} ~f'\.Mol:rr..""'1i01II111>I) Cl___t08l _P\b:'(;P__&ReetWI!I)"tPR'l _eo......_niOs-G1 ~ ....,... o...loP"*'l Owrl., _~C:I'1_~P)~ I:::J ~C:"''''~<<W..:l ~f"lIrn.loIlTl) t9\.O~ ....<""~~ sP.g Zone Change Exhibit B - Proposed RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS TO ESTABLISH A 320-BED HOSPITAL FACILITY AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A HELlPAD FOR A SITE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07 -0202) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, Procedural Findinqs, The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc, ("UHS") filed Planning Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), B, The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, C, On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D, The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. E, On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. F, A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8, 2005, G, On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. H, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 06-04, recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463), J, On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report, at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final Environmental Impact Report, K, On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35,31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )," L, On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. M, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 06-07, approving the Conditional Use Permits for the Project (PA07- 0202), N, Two lawsuits were timely filed seeking to set aside the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the Project by the City Council of the City of Temecula, The lawsuit filed by Petitioners California Nurses Association (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445394) was filed on February 24, 2006, The second suit, by Petitioners Citizens Against Noise and Traffic (Riverside County Superior Court Case No, RIC 445411), was filed on February 24, 2006, 0, On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court (hereafter, the "Court") ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, and its certification of the Final EIR, In its Order, the Court concluded that the EIR failed to adequately address construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts and mitigation measures for traffic impacts, and did not address potential impacts from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plumes potentially generated by three gas stations in the vicinity that might have the potential to migrate under the site, contaminate the soil on the site and generate unhealthful gas vapors, p, The Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency, All other aspects of the Final EIR were unchallenged during the challenge period, and thus are presumed to be adequate along with those aspects specifically upheld by the Court, Q, On July 12, 2007, a scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Draft SEIR") for the Project. R, In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007, S, On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Numbers PA07 -0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07 -0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan), PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080- 007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. T, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. U, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No, 08-04, recommending approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a 320-bed hospital facility and a Conditional Use Permit for a helipad (collectively the "Conditional Use Permits") (PA07-0202), V, On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its approvals of Planning Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map for the property consisting of approximately 35,31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010, W, On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Conditional Use Permits (PA07-0202) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. X, Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No, 08- , entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07- 0200, PA07-0201, PA07-0202)," y, All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred, Section 2, Findinqs for Conditional Use Permit for Hospital Facilitv, The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17,04,010 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code for a conditional use permit for the 320-bed hospital facility: A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; the proposal, a request for a 320-bed hospital facility is consistent with the goals and policies contained in the General Plan and land use standards in the Development Code, The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan encourage "a complete and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, public and open space land uses (Goal 1 );" "a City of diversified development character where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development (Goal 2);" and "a City which is compatible and coordinated regional land use patterns (Goal 8)," The proposed Project provides a regional use that needed in the community and surrounding region, There is currently a lack of medical treatment facilities in the community capable of providing adequate medical care for the general population, The proposed Project integrates public medical facilities necessary for the demand of the current and future population, The project is situated adjacent to residential uses and a State highway, The Project has been designed to mitigate various potentially significant impacts via an EIR, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Conditions of Approval in which circulation, noise, light and glare, biological impacts and air quality has been reviewed and conditioned so the project can co-exist with the surrounding rural residential area, The Project, a hospital facility, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Professional Office (PO) designation, which allows low and mid-rise structures that provide uses such as community facilities, In addition, the project is consistent with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height, The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use, The Project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), B, The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and as designed and conditioned the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures, An Initial Study and an EIR was prepared, which identified potentially significant environmental impacts and a mitigation monitoring program was adopted that mitigates potentially significant impacts such as traffic, air quality, noise, light and glare, and biology to a less than significant level. For example, access points have been designed to reduce the amount of traffic leaving the project site towards residential areas by eliminating left turn options and focusing the primary access points along the State highway, Additional landscaping and berming are included in the Conditions of Approval to screen the height and reduce noise, The tallest buildings were relocated closer to the State highway, away from the residential area to reduce the appearance of the height; this will also reduce the noise from the emergency room area, Sound blankets are required during initial grading and construction activities to mitigate construction noise, There are conditions in place requiring helicopters arriving and leaving the project site to utilize commercial and the State highway corridor rather than residential areas, Emergency vehicles are required to turn off sirens no less than Yo mile from the Project site, The Project is a conditionally permitted use as has been designed and conditioned (including mitigation measures) in manner that will reduce any potentially significant impacts to the surrounding neighborhood, The building and the site are designed to respect the surrounding area and uses and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures, C, The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission, or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood, The conditional use is a request for a 320-bed hospital on a 35,31-acre site, The Project has been reviewed and it is determined that the project is in compliance with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The project also provides amenities such as a multi-use trail between the Project site and the adjacent residences to the north, which will extend a future trail to be constructed in the near future, The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed hospital facilities without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code, 0, The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, The proposed Conditional Use Permit is for a 320-bed hospital. The nature of this use, as conditioned is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the proposed project is providing a service that is needed in the community and region and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the surrounding community, The proposed Project will actually contribute to the long- term viability and longevity of the community by providing additional medical care facilities, In addition, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) and/or the City of Temecula Building Department and Fire Department will review the construction plans for compliance with applicable building and fire codes, Section 3, Findinqs for Conditional Use Permit for Helipad, The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17,04,010 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code for a conditional use permit for a helipad: A. The helipad is consistent with the requirements described in subsection 2 and 3 of Section 17,10,020,P City of Temecula Development Code, The proposed helipad facility is consistent with the requirements described in Section 17,10,020,P of the City of Temecula Development Code, including setbacks from parks, school and residentially zoned parcels, S, The helipad shall not be used until the Applicant applies for and obtains a Special Use Helipad Permit for an Emergency Medical Services Landing Site, as provided for in the California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Section 3527, Airport and Heliport Definitions, This permit allows, over any 12-month period, for no more than an average of six landings per month with a patient or patients on the helicopter, except to allow for adequate medical response to a mass casualty event. C, Noise exposure from helicopter flights will be minimized to the extent practicable because helicopter pilots responding to calls for patient transport shall be informed of the preferred approach and departure heading of 1350 southeast, which avoids flying over residential areas, Section 4, Conditional Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Conditional Use Permit to establish a 320-bed hospital facility and the Conditional Use Permit for a helipad for a site located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s), 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 as set forth in Application No, PA07-0202, subject to the specific conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit A and Exhibit S, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 5, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2008 Michael S, Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W, Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W, Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No, 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W, Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (HOSPITAL) Planning Application No,: PA07-0202 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit establishing a 320-bed hospital facility approximately408,160 square feetwithin a related Development Plan (PA04-0463) located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel Nos, 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Approval Date: Determined by City Council Action Expiration Date: Determined by City Council Action WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1, The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,670,75) which includes the Two Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,606,75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64,00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904, If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)), 2, The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval documentthat will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 2 Planning Department 3, The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application, The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents, City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action, The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense, 4, The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application Numbers PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07-0201 and PA07-0202, 5, The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated June 30, 2004, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. 6, This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17,03,080 of the City's Development Code, 7, The City, and its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances, Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to the modification of the business, a change in scope, emphasis, size or nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use, The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon, 8, The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 9, This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void, By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 10, If commencement of the use has not occurred within two years of approval of this permit, the permittee may file an application at lest thirty days prior to expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to 3 one-year extensions of time, Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only, 11, A separate building permit shall be required for all signage (Sign Program may be required), 12, Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 3 satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan, The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 13, The applicant shall paint a three-foot x three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building, 14, The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations, All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints, 15, Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site, These shall be clearly labeled on site plan, 16, The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 17, A construction staging area plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of a building permit. 18, The applicant shall pursue agreements with all emergency service providers stating that emergency vehicles shall turn off sirens no less than one quarter of a mile from the project site, 19, All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 20, The applicant shall obtain the approval of the Aviation Division of Caltrans and the Federal Aviation Administration, if required, to operate the proposed helipad, All construction and operational requirements of Caltrans and the Federal Aviation Administration shall be complied with, The applicant shall provide a copy of these agencies approval documents to the Planning Director within 30 days of their approval action,\ Fire Prevention 21, The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III,A, Table A-III-A-1, The developer shall provide forthis project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4-hour duration, The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau, The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903,2, Appendix III-A), 22, The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1, Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets, Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system (CFC 903,2, 903.4,2, and Appendix III-B), C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 4 23, All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 24, If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704,2 and 902,2,2), This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates, All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction, Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field, Police Department 25, All exterior lighting surrounding the project site should be energy-saving and minimized after 11 :00 PM to comply with the State of California Lighting Ordinance, Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements, 26, All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above, The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed, 27, All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade, 28, Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings shall be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered, Notify the Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken, 29, Upon completion of construction, the interior of this facility shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion, All multi-tenant buildings located within the center should have their own alarm system, 30, All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange," 31, Any public telephones located on the exterior of this facility should be placed in a well- lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering, This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of this facility, C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 5 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 6 Planning Department 32. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 33. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subjectto review and approval by the Director of Planning. 34. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 35. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 36. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. 37. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 38. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 39. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 40. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. Fire Prevention C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 7 41. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4). 42. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level. 43. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. 44. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 45. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 8 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 9 Planning Department 46. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 47. A construction staging area plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of a building permit. 48. All downspouts shall be internalized. 49. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection". d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." e. One copy of the approved grading plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to- head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. 50. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 10 Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 51. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, and hardscape) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 52. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 53. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Fire Prevention 54. Prior to building permit or building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). 55. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 241-4.1). 56. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A). C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 11 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 12 Planning Department 57. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 58. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 59. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 60. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 61. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 62. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 63. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Fire Prevention 64. Prior to Occupancy and building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 13 shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902). 65. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 66. Prior to issuance of Occupancy all manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4). 67. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 14 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (HELlPAD) Planning Application No.: PA07-0202 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit establishing a helipad within a related Development Plan (PA04-0463) located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel No. 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Approval Date: Determined by City Council Action Expiration Date: Determined by City Council Action WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,670.75) which includes the Two Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,606.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval documentthat will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 15 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 16 Planning Department 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning Application Numbers PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07-0201 and PA07-0202. 5. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated June 30, 2004, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. 6. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 7. The City, and its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to the modification of the business, a change in scope, emphasis, size or nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review and revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. 8. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 9. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 10. If commencement of the use has not occurred within two years of approval of this permit, the permittee may file an application at lest thirty days prior to expiration of the conditional use permit, apply for up to 3 one-year extensions of time. Each extension of time shall be granted in one-year increments only. 11. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage (Sign Program may be required). 12. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 17 satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 13. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 14. A construction staging area plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of a building permit. 15. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 16. The flight path for all helicopter traffic arriving and departing the project site shall be limited to the Highway 79 South corridor and commercial areas, unless it is determined unsafe due to weather conditions. Flights over residential areas shall be avoided to the greatest extent possible. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING HOSPITAL PLANS TO THE CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEAL TH AND PLANNING DEVELOPMENT (OSHPOD) 17. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the Aviation Division of Caltrans and the Federal Aviation Administration, if required, to operate the proposed helipad. All construction and operational requirements shall comply with Caltrans and the Federal Aviation Administration. shall be complied with. The applicant shall provide a copy of these agencies approval documents to the Planning Director within 30 days of their approval action.1 Fire Prevention 18. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Police Department 19. All exterior lighting surrounding the project site should be energy-saving and minimized after 11 :00 p.m. to comply with the State of California Lighting Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements. 20. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. 21. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 22. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Notifythe Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 18 23. Upon completion of construction, the interior of this facility shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. All multi-tenant buildings located within the center should have their own alarm system. 24. Any public telephones located on the exterior of this facility should be placed in a well- lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of this facility. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 19 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 20 Planning Department 25. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 26. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subjectto review and approval by the Director of Planning. 27. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 28. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 29. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. 30. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 31. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 32. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 33. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 21 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 22 Planning Department 34. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 35. A construction staging area plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Planning prior to issuance of a building permit. 36. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." e. One copy of the approved grading plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. 37. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in orderto reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is notto look like an after- C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 23 thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. Fire Prevention 38. Prior to building permit or building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). 39. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 241-4.1). 40. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A). C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 24 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 25 Planning Department 41. Prior to the release of power, occupancy, or any use allowed by this permit, the applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment is visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing appropriate screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 42. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 43. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 44. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 45. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 46. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 47. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Fire Prevention 48. Prior to Occupancy and building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902). C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 26 49. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 50. Prior to issuance of Occupancy all manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4). 51. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869074.doc 27 RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL, A HELlPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07 -0200) THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF TEMECUlA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOllOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. ("UHS"), filed Planning Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"). B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). C. On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 28, 2005. G. On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-04, recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463). J. On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final Environmental Impact Report. K. On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT) PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )." L. On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. M. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-07, approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463). N. On February 24, 2006, the California Nurses Association and Citizens Against Noise and Traffic each filed a separate petition challenging the City of Temecula's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project proposed by Universal Health Services, Inc. O. On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, including without limitation, its certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and all related approvals and permits, until the City of Temecula has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Riverside County Superior Court ruled in favor of the California Nurses Association and Citizens Against Noise and Traffic, holding that: (1) the MTBE plume was not properly analyzed in the Final Environmental Impact Report; (2) the siren noise at the hospital was significant and should have been mitigated; and (3) not all feasible traffic mitigation measures were adopted for cumulative traffic impacts. P. The Riverside County Superior Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency. Q. On July 12, 2007, another scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the new Environmental Impact Report for the Project. R. In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a new Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007. S. On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Numbers PA07 -0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07 -0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan), PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080- 007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. T. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. U. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-04, recommending approval of the Development Plan (PA07-0200). V. On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its approvals of Planning Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05- 0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010. W. On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Development Plan (PA07-0200) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. X. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08- , entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA07-0198 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT), PA07-0199 (ZONE CHANGE), PA07-0202 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS), PA07-0200 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN), PA07-0201 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )." The new Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program accurately addresses the impacts associated with the adoption of this Resolution. Y. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findinqs. The City Council hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.01 O.F of the City of Temecula Municipal Code for a development plan: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals and policies in the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development Code and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the project has been reviewed and as designed and conditioned, it has been determined that the project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the General Plan. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public, health, safety and general welfare. The overall development of the land has been designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare, because the project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Development Plan to construct 408,160 square foot hospital, a helipad, two medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet on 35.31 acres, located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 as set forth in Application No. PA07-0200, subject to the specific Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2008 Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0200 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a 320-bed hospital facility, approximately 408,160 square feet in size, two medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center, all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet, located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel No. 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: Commercial Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Approval Date: Determined by City Council Action Expiration Date: Determined by City Council Action WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Departrnent a cashier's check or rnoney order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,670.75) which includes the Two Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollar and seventy-five cents ($2,606.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Pianning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 4 Planning Department 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indernnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall prornptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The perrnittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. Prior to the approval and issuance of any permanent signs, a sign prograrn shall be submitted for review and approval for the project site. 9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued rnaintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 5 13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs' prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Condition of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco Color NO.1: Stucco Color NO.2: Tile Base: Alurninurn Panel: Ceramic Roof Tile: Tinted Glass: Window Frarne: Senergy, Parchment, # 342 Senergy, Walden, # 3104 Daltile, 12" x 12" Continental Slate, Indian Red CS51 Centria, 9910 L T Seawolf Monier Lifetile, Terra Cotta Flashed Viracon, Bronze VE 4-2M Kawneer, Medium Bronze Kynar 500 Fluorocarbon 14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. 15. The Condition of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff prior to approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish, technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Condition of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 16. All utilities shall be screened from view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three foot clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Departrnent before starting the screen. Utilities shall be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities shall not look like an after-thought. Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light poles shall be located on the landscape plans and the applicant shall insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 17. The applicant shall insure that mature plantings will not interfere with utilities, adjacent site existing structures and landscaping and traffic sight lines. 18. All requirements of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Water Efficient Landscape Design) are required to be met. 19. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project as attached. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-OP.doc 6 Police Department 20. Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police Department immediately so a report can be taken. 21. Crime Prevention: Any business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department. 22. Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the building. 23. Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at a height of no rnore than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders frorn breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows. a. The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime Prevention Through Environrnental Design (CPTED). 24. Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the cornplex should be energy-saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance. Furtherrnore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting Requirements. 25. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one foot candle of light at ground level, evenly dispersed. Building Department 26. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 27. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0- 90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.rn. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays Community Services Department 28. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0200 Temecu[a Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 7 29. All trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as a regular solid waste container. 30. The property owner or private maintenance association shall maintain all parkways, perimeter landscaping, trail, walls, fences and on site lighting. 31. The developer shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Fire Prevention 32. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 33. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a rninirnurn fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 - hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A). 34. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Departrnent access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet frorn any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). . 35. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow ernergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 36. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. Public Works Department 37. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvernents, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to cornmencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way. 38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to comrnencernent of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 8 39. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 40. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or property owner. 41. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 42. The driveway on De Portola Road will be restricted to right-in/right-outileft-in movements. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP,doc 9 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 10 Planning Department 43. The applicant shall subrnit seven complete sets of final approved plans to the Planning Department with the following revisions shown on the pians. Planning staff will stamp these plans as approved for distribution to each department and the applicant. 44. The Landscape plan shall be revised as follows: a. The applicant shall provide a vines on the screening wall at the loading dock area, subject to the approvai of the Planning Director. b. The iandscape plan shall provide shrubs, vines and/or other acceptable screening methods to screen the oxygen storage container in the loading dock area, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. c. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show final color and finish details for all decorative hardscape throughout the project site. Decorative hardscape shall be provided at all primary buiiding entrances and outdoor gathering areas (including the hospital, medical office buildings, cancer center and fitness rehabilitation center). d. A minimum of one broad canopy type tree shall be provided per every four parking spaces. The tree shall be provided in close proximity to the parking spaces it is to shade. e. One landscape finger shall be provided per 10 parking spaces. The interior finger planting width shall be a minimum of five feet wide with the length equal to the adjoining parking space. Curbs and concrete walks shall not infringe on this five foot width. The pianter shall contain a rninimum of one tree with surrounding groundcover or shrubs or both. The grading plans shall be revised as necessary to refiect this requirernent. 45. The elevations for all buildings shall be revised in a manner that all exterior ladders are screened from the public view of Highway 79 South. 46. The applicant shall submit a separate plan, entitled outdoor furniture detail plan, showing details of all outdoor furniture, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Outdoor . furniture shall be decorative and of high quality appearance. 47. The applicant shall provide a detailed elevation drawing of the water and boulder feature at the main entrance, near the porte-cochere. Said feature shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. 48. The applicant shall submit cross section verifying that all roof mounted equipment will be screened from public view as determined acceptable by the Director of Planning. 49. The elevations and roof plans shall show internalized downspouts for all buildings and structures, excluding trash enclosures. 50. Trash enclosures shall be shown on the site plan, landscape plan and elevations and shall cornply with the following: a. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. b. All trash enclosures shall blend with the architecture of the overall center and include a decorative roof type feature as approved by the Director of Planning. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP,doc 11 c. Trash enclosures shall be screened from view. The applicant shall provide shrubs and wall vines on three sides of enclosures as required to provide screening. 51. The elevations shall be revised to show decorative lighting fixtures at the primary entry of each building/structure, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Details of all light fixtures, including decorative entry lighting and wall mounted lighting shall be provided on the plans. 52. The Applicant shall revise the site plan and provide a detailed elevation drawing to show a decorative fence no less than four feet in height around the helipad, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Said fence shall be constructed in a manner that deflects horizontal wind velocities caused by the rotation of rotor blades, providing all FAR Part 77 imaginary surfaces and the surface of the area rernain obstruction free, per Section 171 0.020.P of the City of Temecuia Development Code. 53. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transforrner(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 54. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. 55. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to irnmediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 56. CR-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human rernains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal rnonitors. 57. CR-2 If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatrnentand mitigation. G:\Planning\2007\PA07:'0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 12 58. CR-3 A qualified archaeological monitor wili be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 59. CR-4 Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground breaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 60. CR-5 The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 61. CR-6 All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. 62. A qualified paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological/ archaeological impacts. A meeting between the paleontologist/ archaeologist, Planning Department staff, and grading contractor prior to the commencement of grading operations and the excavation shall be arranged. The paleontologist/archaeologist or representative shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. The applicant shall provide written verification that services for on-site professional archaeological and paleontological monitoring has been contracted during all phases of earthmoving activities. 63. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be contacted to afford the Band an opportunity to monitor ground-disturbing activities and participate in the decisions regarding collection and curation of any such resources. The applicant shall submit correspondence to the Planning Department that confirms that such contact has been made prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 64. The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction agreement/treatment plan with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, prior to the issuance of grading permits, that sets forth and contains the terms and conditions for the treatment of discoveries of Native American cultural resources. The agreement/treatment plan shall contain provisions for the treatment of all Native American cultural items, artifacts, and human rernains that rnay be uncovered during the project. The agreement/treatment plan may allow for the presence of Pechanga tribal monitors during any ground-disturbing activities. The applicant shall submit a signed copy of the pre-construction agreement/treatment plan to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 65. The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to relinquish all cultural resources, including all archeological artifacts, that are found on the Project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition. This rnitigation measure shall be placed on the grading pian as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 66. Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified archaeological rnonitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeoiogicai resources discovered on the property. This rnitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. G:\Ptanning\2007\PA07 -0200 T emecula Regional. Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP .doc 13 67. If any human remains are encountered on the project site, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office and the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians will be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains. This rnitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. . 68. The applicant must enter into a written pre-excavation agreernent with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians that addresses the treatrnent and disposition of all cultural resources, human resources and hurnan remains discovered on-site. A copy of the signed document shall be submitted to the Planning Department. 69. The grading plan shall be revised to include the following: a. Earth berms as required along the northern property lines and along Highway 79 South as discussed in these Conditions of Approval. b. A note on the plans indicating all areas not proposed for development within 100 days shall be tufted, seeded and irrigated for soil and dust erosion. c. Show the five-foot landscape dimension for all parking islands, including the 1-foot concrete landing strip (seven feet total width). One parking island is required per ten parking spaces. Public Works Department 70. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydral:llic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way. 71. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 72. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 73. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 74. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Departrnent of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction. 75. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private G:\Plannjng\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 14 drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recornmendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 76. NPDES - The project proponent shall implernent construction-phase and post-construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Ternecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sedirnent Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES perrnit. Priority Developrnent Projects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatrnent control BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 77. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance frorn the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works 78. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 79. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Departrnent of Public Works for review and approval. 80. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Departrnent of Public Works. 81. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of perrnits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 82. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone X. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 15 Fire Prevention 83. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4). 84. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24-foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level. 85. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a rninimum of 16 feet wide on each side uniess the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. 86. Fire Departrnent vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 87. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been cornpleted shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 16 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 17 Planning Department 88. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 89. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in'such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 90. The final construction plans shall include a photometrics plan showing foot-candle illumination in the parking lot, driveways, drive aisles, pedestrian paths of travel and building entrances. A rninimum of one-footcandle illumination shall be maintained throughout the site and a minimum of two foot-candle illurnination shall be provided at primary building entrances. 91. Final Construction plans shall provide decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided at the prirnary entry of each building/structure, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Final construction plans shall provide details of all light fixtures, including decorative entry lighting, parking lot lighting and wall mounted lighting. 92. The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan for the helipad facility. 93. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conforrn to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection". d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." e. One copy of the approved grading plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. i. A landscape maintenance program shall be subrnitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 18 landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shail indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to- head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. 94. The final construction landscape plan shall include the following: a. A calculation indicating the percentage of the site that is to be landscaped shall be provided on the construction landscape plans. The applicant shall insure that minimum required code percentages for landscaping are provided to meet the specific zone requirernents. b. The applicant shall field verify adjacent existing street plantings and coordinate proposed plantings to be compatible as approved by the Director of Planning. c. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. d. Street trees shall be provided along all streets at the rate of one per every 30 feet of street frontage. e. Areas proposed for development in another phase occurring not within six months of the completion of the previous phase shall be temporarily tufted, seeded and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. A note on the grading plan and landscape plan shall be provided. f. A minimurn five foot width planting area shall be provided at the ends of all parking rows. Curbs and concrete walks shall not infringe on this five foot width. The planter length shall be equal to the adjoining parking space. The planter shall contain a minimum of one tree, shrubs and ground covers. g. Accent trees (minimum 36-inch box size) shall be installed at entries to parking areas in order to define the entry and provide a focal point. h. Indian Tribe, Faurei varieties shall be provided for Crape Myrtle. i. Additional trees shall be added on the north, east and west sides of building MOB #2 as approved by the Director of Planning. j. A combination of large (no less than 24-inch box) Afghan Pines and California Pepper trees (or other large screen trees) shall be provided along the northern perirneter of the project to screen off-site views of the developrnent as approved by the Director of Planning. . k. A landscaped berm shall be provided along the northern property lines adjacent to the residentially zoned lots and DePortola, with rnature (24-inchand 36-inch box) screen trees to screen the view of the buildings and reduce the amount of glare from the project site, subject to approval by the Director of Planning. A cross section shall be provided on grading and landscape plans verifying the buffer area. G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 19 I. The landscaped area along Highway 79 South shall include a meandering berm with large shrubs to provide additional screening of the parking lot. The applicant shall provide a combination of shrub plantings and earth berms that can be maintained at a minirnurn height of three feet around all parking areas to screen parking from off- site views. m. All areas not designed for buildings, parking, driveways or other useable features shall be landscaped, unless approved by the Director of Planning. The area along the eastern property line. adjacent to the access driveway shall be landscaped, unless it is determined critical habitat not to be disturbed. 95. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 96. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, and hardscape) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 97. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 98. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 99. All roof rnounted equipment shall be screened from public view as determined acceptable by the Director of Planning. 100. All exterior wall mounted ladders (for all buildings) shall be located in a rnannerthat they are not visible from Highway 79 South. Public Works Department 101. Prior to the first building permit, Parcel Map No. 32468 shall be recorded. unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 102. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 20 d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Numbers. 400. 401 and 402. e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 103. The Developer shall design the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Irnprove De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W) to include installation of pavement, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). c. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) - Provide southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap. d. The traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Country Glen Way shall be modified to allow a full movement intersection. 104. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minirnum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Private 28-foot wide ingress/egress road to include installation of paving and curb per the approved site plan. 105. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, and .other traffic control devices as appropriate b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines 106. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. The Traffic Control Plan shall indicate that construction traffic may not use the entrance from DePortola Road to access the site. 107. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be subrnitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 21 108. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 109. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 110. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. In addition to the above Public Works Department Conditions of Approval, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT IN PHASE I - (A 170-bed hospital with 80,000 square feet of medical office space) 111. Parcel Map No. 32468 shall be recorded, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 112. The Developer shall design the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Departrnent of Public Works: a. Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). i. Westbound a) Provide a dedicated right turn lane - 12 foot wide by 200 feet long b) Provide three (3) thru lanes c) Provide one (1) left turn lane ii. Eastbound a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide two (2) thru lanes and c) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane b. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) i. Installation of half-street improvernents, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) ii. Restricted to right in/right out vehicular movement c. Main entry (Country Glen Way) and Highway 79 South i. Signal modification ii. Provide a 245' continuous median from Highway 79 South to main drive aisle G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 22 iii. Southbound (exiting site) a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide a 20 foot wide shared thru/right turn lane iv. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide d. De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W) i. Installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not Iirnited to water and sewer) ii. Provide a 28 foot wide internal ingress/egress connection to De Portola Road e. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) i.frovide southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap. Building Department The Conditions of Approval herein (Building Department) are not applicable to the projects that fall under the jurisdiction of the State of California OSHPD. These conditions are applicable to the construction documents for projects, specifically the medical office buildings that are within the jurisdiction of the City of Temecula Building and Safety Department. 113. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code 2005 Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 114. A complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 115. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 116. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 117. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998). 118. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 119. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 120. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DPIPlanningICOA-DP.doc 23 121. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 122. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plurnbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 123. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 124. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. 125. A pre-construction rneeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Community Services Department 126. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 127. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional street lighting which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, subrnit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of arterial street lighting on Hwy 79 South into the TCSD maintenance program. Fire Department 128. Prior to building permit or building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Departmeni vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2). 129. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minirnum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirernents are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issl!ed (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1). 130. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A). G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 24 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\PJanning\COA-DP.doc 25 Planning Department 131. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens, should be prepared upon completion of the steps outlined the initial study, under cultural resources. The report should include a discussion of the significance of all recovered specimens. The report and inventory, when submitted to the Lead Agency (City ofTemecula), would signify completion of the program to mitigate impacts to the palentologic and archaeological resources. 132. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted rnechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered rnansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 133. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properiy constructed and in good working order. 134. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, ifthe landscaping and irrigation system have been rnaintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 135. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches frorn the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles rnay be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 136. In addition to the above requirernents, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 137. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 26 138. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Public Works Department PHASE I - A 170-bed hospital with 80,000 square foot medical office space. 139. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase I, the following improvements shall be constructed and operational: a. Highway 79 South i. Traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Country Glen Way ii. Roadway improvements a) Westbound (i) Provide a dedicated right turn lane - 12 foot wide by 200 feet long (ii) Provide three (3) thru lanes (iii) Provide one(1) left turn lane b) Eastbound (i) Provide two (2) left turn lanes (ii) Provide two (2) thru lanes and (iii) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane b. Main Entry/Country Glen Way i. Provide a 245' continuous median from Highway 79 South to main drive aisle ii. Southbound (exiting site) a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide a 20-foot wide shared thru/right turn lane iii. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide c. De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W) i. 28-foot wide internal ingress/egress connection from project site to De Portola Road ii. Roadway irnprovements d. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) i. Southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap e. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) i. Installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) ii. Restricted to right in/right out vehicular movement G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP .doc 27 PHASE II - Expand to a 320-bed hospital plus an additional 60,000 square foot medical office space. 140. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance frorn the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 141. All public improvements, including traffic signal modification, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 142. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance darnaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. Building and Safety Department 143. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or Shell Buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. Fire Prevention 144. Prior to Occupancy and building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet ( CFC sec 902). 145. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 146. Prior to issuance of Occupancy all rnanual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Departrnent building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4). 147. Prior to rnap recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and forrnat prior to satisfaction of this condition. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 28 Police Department 148. Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 149. Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 29 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 30 150. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated July 24, 2004, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or rnoney order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 151. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 7,2007, a copy of which is attached. 152. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Authority's transmittal dated July 21, 2004, a copy of which is attached. 153. The applicant shall comply with the recomrnendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated July 12, 2004, a copy of which is attached. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc 31 <rT.n.~"U.""I"'''''''~'Y.l'' General Managec-cJiiefEngineer :., 1995 MARKET STREET RIVBRSIDB, CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788.9965 FAX RIVERSIDE COUNlY FLOOD CO AND WATER CONSERVATION DIS 51180.1 C!t}' ofTemecula Plann]f!g DePlll1ment Post Office Box 9033 Temecula. Califomla 92589-9033 Attentlo~: DM-l l,..o,Jq ladiesandGentlemen: Re: ~-6q",~ J;.. p,e.. ot-o~<..3 The Dlsllict does not nonna/ly recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases In IncoJP.!lrated dtles. 1l1e Dlsllict also does hot Dlan check ~ land use cases, or provide Stale Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard rellOlts for such cases. Dlstiict comments/recommendatfons for' such cases are nonnally limited to items of s~c Interest to the Dlsllict Includll'!9 Dlstricl Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and dtalnage faclJ/tles whlch.could be CIlIlsidered a Jogfcal componenfor extension of a master plan system, and DIslrfct Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition; Information of a general nature Is provided. . . ." 1l1e Dlsllict has not reviewed the pI'9pOSed project In detail and the followl!lll checked colilmenls do not In !lI1Y way constitute or Imply DIstrict appril1!a! or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to lIood hazard, public health and safety.or any ?ther such Issue: . . . ThIs pl'9ject WOUld not be impaCted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of reglonallnterest proposed. . . ~ ThIs project Involves Oislrfct Master Plan facilities. The Dlstricl win accept ownershJp of such facilities on written request of the City. FacUities must be consbucted to Dlslrfct stanaards. and Disllict plan check, and inspectlon wIH be required for Dlstricl acceptance. Plan check, inspection and admlnislraUve fees win be required. . . . . This PrOject prqposes channels, stonn drains 36 inches or !;vger In diameter, or other facilities that could be cons/dered regIOnal In nature andIor a 10!llCa1 extension of the aclo~ Master Oralnagl! Plan. TheDislrfcl wouia consider aoceJl!l!1g ownership Of SUCh faallbes on WIltten request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to Olstricl standafds, and Dlslrict Plan check and InsP!lClion will be required for Dlsllict acceptance. Plan check, Inspectlon end administrative fees will be required. This proJe2! Is located within the limits of the Oistrlcl's . Area Orainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adQPtea; appllcaDle fees shoula De pala Dy cashle(s check or money order only to lI1e Flood Control Dlstrlcl roo. to Issuance of building or gmd/ng perin/ts whichever comes first Fees to be paid should be at the rate In effect at the time of issuance of lIle.actual penlUl . GENERAL INFORMATION This proJecl may require a National Pollutant Discharge EUmlnalIon 5ys!8m (NPOESl ~ from the state Water Resources Control Boattl. Clearance for .gradlng, reCOrdation, or other final !lPProval Should not be given untillhe 'City has detennlned that:thej project has bfiim granted a penn!{ or 1S"Sl1own to bEl exempt . If this Pf9Jectlnvolves a Federal Em~en!fY Management Agenr:y (FEMAl mapp.ed flood plain, then the City should require .lIie applicant 10 P;FOvlde all itudJ~1 calCUlalfons, jJ!ans Bnd" other Ilifonnallon re!l\lll'ed to meet FEMA l"e!Iulrements, 8nd should further require UIlIl the aPPlicant Obtain a Conditional Lettor of Map Revision {CLOMR) prior 10 grading, recordation or othei: lInaI approval of the project, end a Letter of Map Revision (lOMR) prior to occupancy. . If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain Is impacted bv this project. the City should require the applicant to obtain a SectIon 1601/1603 Agreement frOm the Callfomla D"epartmem of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act 5ectiQn 404 Pennlt from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, orwWlftten correspondence from these agencies Indicating the pl"9lect is exemp\ from these racl!hraments. A Clean alar Act Section 401 Water Qualitv CertIfIcation may be requl1'ed Trom the loCal CaJlfomla Regronal Waler Quality Control Boattl prior to Issuance of the Corps 404 pennR. X /IN ~s:"" P,;-~f'" ,s1t.JtI,L. ll~ /l~T1'rltJet> ~ kJy ...J0,.1'- WI"TlHtJ f'~ blS-qt.t C.r {Ll~~ ~- WI'<'1 '(I-- "" rrtt t::>IG..r~ Gor f"'Il<q t...l T1 ~. 1"J:<M\!!.","I.\\.ooPw q~-t. ~" c:,A'M ~@[EOW~m1 JUl 2 8 2004 ~ .' By . Very buly yours, ~4 ARTURO DIAZ Senior CIvlI Engineer Date: ,~Y.2~ .7oJ-( . . . - i ,~ co\1rr OF RIVERSIDE · COMMONI1Y HEALlli AGENCY ! ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH , :. I i ! .' I I I , l i I I i !. I I ., , I I I I I j I J :. July 7, 2004 rD)fE .~ ~ 0 \J i~~ i\1\1 Jl::'" li ,a04 ~ City ofTemecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Dan Long By RE: Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA04-0463 Dear Mr. Long: Department'of Environment8I Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA04-0463 to construct Temecula Regional Hospital and has no objections. Water mid sewer services should be available in this area, although we have not iti. receipt of any information concerning those services. . PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) Any food establishments, (including ~ending machines), shall require three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plwnbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330. e) Any hazardous materials handling or storage shall require a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (955- 5055) Sincerely, Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health SpeclaI/st (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. ee: . Doug ThompsOn, Hazardous Materials , , ~cU Eaforcem..t Aseac, . p.o. Box 1280, Rlverside, CI\ 92502-1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX (909) 181-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street, 9thAoo~ Riverside, CI\ 92501 J '1"'4 u.e on<! Waler Ea8I.-S . P.O. Ibc 1206, 1liwnIde, CI\ 92502-1206 . (909) 955-8980 . FAX (909)!/55.8903 . 4080 Lemon SfJee~ 2nd Floor, Illvmide, CA 92501 i. I. I j i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :. , .....- j~ · ~ r .. '- .. July 21,2004 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 ThlRl Slreel P.O. Box 59968 RlWlISIde. CA 92517-1968' Phone; (909) 56l>5OOO Fex: (909) 565-5001 Mr. Dan Long, Case Planner Planning Depl, City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: P04.o462 and PA04-D463 - TemeculaHospital- Comments from RTA Dear Mr: Long: Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed 535,000 sq ft medical complex at Temecula Hospital along State Route (SR) 79. A copy of RTA Planning's Internal Development Review Memo Is enclosed and provides additional rationale and technical detail in support of the requests for transit amenities that would expand mobility options for this project To encourage and enhance future transit options at TemeClila Hospital, RTA recommends the site plan or street improvement plans be revised at to show the following features: · A paved, lighted, and ADA-complianttranslt bus stop with a 220 ft-Iong turnout configura- . tion capable of accommodating two parked buses, to be Installed along the N side of SR 79, just west of the primary hospital entrance. The bus stop should incorporate a paved passenger wafting area and space for installation of benches and passenger shelters. . · Information note: Sufficient right-of-way appears available for this turnout without significant adjustment to sidewalks, loss of parking spaces or required landscaping and with minimum disturbance of future street tree or utility structure Installations. · "R'fA siaff is also recommending designation on the. plans of an additional specified clear path of travel from the bus stop to the enlrilnce of the main hospital building. · RTA staff also'adVises that the project proponents work With the City to Install two new passenger shellers al the new bus slop thai are complimentary to the hospital's design and architectural themes. RTA requests these recommendations be made conditions of approval for PA 04-0462 and PA04-0463. If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at (909) 565-5164 or contact me online at mmccov/1ilriversldetransllcom. S!:::~IY, 71. n '/~~/ Michael McCoySenior Planner F:\dataIPlannlnglMikeM\WordlOev Review\Temecula\2004\RTA Ltrhd - Temec Hosp.doc '.:.' ..' '~1IrA RlnnIoIe 'ftoMsIt Agmcr July 21, 2004 PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW To: Anne Palatino, Director of Planning Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~ City ofTemecula, Cases PA04-o462 & -0463: Plot Plan review and' CUP for 535,000 sq fl of hasp/lal and medlcal-relaled facilities, N of State Route (SR) 79 and W of Margarita Rd; RIversIde Transit Agency (RTA) Comments Bus routes Involved: Exlstlng Route 24 and future bus routes Summary: UnIversal Health Care Services Inc proposes a site plan and conditional use pennlt for the Temecula HospItal proJect, 535,000 sq ft of medIcal facilities located on 35 now vacant acres % mile west of the SR79-Margarlta Rd Intersection In a rapIdly expandIng commercial district of Temecula. This wIll be the first full.factlity medical Institution In Southwest RIversIde County and will be a dIstinct asset to the community, challenging planners and engIneers to provide at robust suite of mobility opUons for access to It. The . project Includes the followIng components: From: Subject: · 176-bed, 6-story hospital buildIng, IncludIng Emergency admIttance . A 5-story expansion of the hospital · Two multl-story medIcal office bUildings . Cancer center · Fitness center . 1280 parkIng spaces The site plan's perimeter and Interior circulation patterns are very good, wIth primary access provided dIreCtly off a sIgnalized IntersectIon at SR 79 and Country Glen Wy. The hospItal's maIn building entrance will have a covered drlve-thru loop suitable for van. pools, paratranslt and most private vehicles. Several ADA paths-of-travel are specIfied on the slle plan for connectIon between the maIn hospital and all perImeter driveways. . . RTA oPerates Route 24 along some port/ons of.SR79 but the bus currently does not stop at thIs site. RTA Is currently st\ldylng a general reconflguratlon. of bus routes In South. west RIversIde County and anticIpates addItIonal bus servIce along SR79 and Margarita Rd In the relatively near future since It Is an Important.arterlal that would serve many commercial generators of bus traffic. In consldQrlng what transit amenities would be approprIate for the TQmecula HospItal site, RTA staff looked at othQr comparable hospItals In the Inland CountIes. In some Cases, such as Route 17, the hospItal Is Important enough to be the route tennlnus or name of the line as Identified on the bus Itself. Also, several distinct transit routes often serve a single large hC1spltal, as listed on the next page. It was found that In general, buses would come onto the site, close to the main buildIng, . to drop off and piCk up passengers If the facility was publicly owned, such as RIverside F:\dalalPlannlnglMlkeMlWord\Qev Revlew\Temecula\2004ITemeculaHosp.doc ;. ! , , i i I , I I ,. I , , , I i , I ,. I !. I i I I I ;. :"<: Caunty General Medical Center In Mareno. Valley. Far privately awned haspltals, like Kaiser ar San Go.rgo.nla, the transit stop was always o.ff the property alo.ng a nearby street. Same examples o.f transit service and sto.ps are: · .Ka/ser Ho.spltalln Riverside: 2 lines, with transit sto.ps alo.ng Magno.lia having multiple turno.uts, benches and shelters, etc; · Lama Unda Ho.spltal: 3 lines, with transit sto.ps at severallocatio.ns an perimeter af co.mplex and ather nearby medical facilities such as the Veterans Hospital; · Riverside General: 3 lines, with transit center and bus turn-aro.und an site, very clo.se and canvenlent to main building; · Riverside Co.mmunlty: 2 lines, bus sto.ps alo.ng Magnalla, o.ff the pro.perty; · Co.rona Regional Med ctr: 2 lines; bus staps alo.ng S Main Sf, off the pro.perty; · St. Bernardlne Med Ctr: 3 lines, multiple bus staps alang varlo.us perimeter sts Smaller ho.spitals such as Menifee Valley Med etr ar the Inland Valley Reglo.nal Medical ctr are nat expected to. be comparable to. the planned Temecula facility upo.n Its full bulld-out. RT A staff believes Riverside's Kaiser Haspltal bus stap conflguraijan wauld . be mast comparable with the future needs af the proposed Temecula facility, since the former also. has several medical to.wers, dactar afflces and a similar perimeter access road netwark. No. an-site access far regular transit buses Is anticipated at either site. To ensure safety and canvenlence' af future transit aperatlans at the Temecula Ho.spltal, RTA Is respectfully requesting the site plan ar ass~lated street engineering plans'be amended to. Include a two. o.r three-bay bus. stap and bus turnaut Io.cated at: · No.rth side of State Highway 79, an the far side (west af) the praposed signalized Intersectlan with Cauntry Glen Wy and the primary haspltal entrance. The stop's taper, ar entrance area, sho.uld begin no. clo.ser than 50 feet fro.m the end af the Intersectlo.n's radius and extend for no. less than 220 It to. accommo.date two. parked buses. The exact poslOo.n wo.uld depend an locatIo.n af utility structures, cammer- clal signs, street lighting, key landscaping and ather factars. The minimum depth (I.e. width) af the turno.ut Is 10 It, hawever this may be reduced to. 5 It If a designa- ted, striped bike path Is Installed alang this portlo.n of State Highway 79. · Additionally, RTA requests the site plan specify anather clear path af travel from the main building go.ing directly aut to. the requested bus stop Io.catlan. · RT~ staff also. requests that the pro.Ject proponents co.nslder Investing In same' addltlo.nal architectural amenities far the bus stop,lts benches and shelters by perhaps taking this appo.rtunlty to. make a positive visual statement at this site In the. Interests of maintaining the community Image o.f Temecula. Because this facility will be ane af the mast well-kno.wn and visited places In the city, Its bus sto.p Is deserving af a hlgh-quallty bench and shelter that are visually campatlble and campllmentary to. the main building architectural theme. The appllcanfs architect or engineers are urged to. contact RTA staff far further details. RTA staff will request the multl-bay bus turnaut and the path o.ftravel discussed abo.ve be made candltlans o.f appraval far cases 04-0462 and 04.;0463. RTA staff will wo.rk with future devE!lapers afthe eastbo.und bus sto.p site (acrass SR 79) to. ensure It Is comparable and compatible with the sto.p In frant af the Ho.spltal. INITIAl REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: July 21,2004. F:\datalPlanning\MlkeM\WomIDev ReviewlTemecuIa\2004\TemeculaHosp.doc @ KaIIohD Water Board ofDittdori JobnE.Boqland .......... c.u. P.Ko Sr. Vice PruWeDt Stepbenr1. CwvAa _aD..... .....Il.Dnb LIsa D. Rermall .rohn V. RO.sI Offuon, BrlaDJ. Bn.cIT """'''"- """"" L ....... DiredoI'ofFinance-Treuaru &P. "Bob" Lemona Direc:tar~Ea&in~ P<<Z7B.Loack eom..u.r ......M._ Datrict ~AdnW:ailtntiq 8erri.otIr~ C. Michael Cowett a-t a-t. &Krlecu- LLP Genen1~ July 12, 2004 SUBJEcr: .p-:~;~) :;.0......... ,// 'f",:;';. * ~':.9 t? ~'f8> .f'"", ~.J) ~ W@ ~ ~~ WATER AVAaABILITY, TEMECUL GIONALHOSPITAL; PARCELS NO. I, NO.2, AND NO.3 OF PARCEL MAP 13043; PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 6813; AND PARCELS NO.1, NO.2, NO.3, AND NO.4 OF PARCEL MAP 13734; APN 959.080-0111 THROUGH APN 959-080-004, AND APN 959-080-007 THROUGH APN 959-080-010; PA04-0462 AND PA04-0463 Dan Long, Project Planner. City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 - 9033 Dear Mr. Long: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off- site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required; the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the propertr owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. All on-site public water facilities will require public utility easements in favor of RCWD. The project proposes to relocate RCWD's 12-inch discharge pipeline and the associated easement from RCWD Well ~o. 120. This pipeline must be contained within a minimum 2O-foot-wide easement, which is located such that no permanent structures or trees are located within its boundaries. The projeCt proponent should s<<hedule a meeting with RCWD to confinn and detail these reij*emeIl.ts. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT -m.:I'ot;. ~c~e;~;er,p. Development Engineering anager 04\MM;mcOl~ . c: Laurie Williams. Engineering Services Supervisor Bud Jones, Engineering Project Coordinator . BaaehoCalUonafa WU:er DWrict 4213SWlIICbelta'RoacI .. PostOflioeBoz9017. "1'emeaJJa.CaUtomia92589-9017 .. (909)296-6900"F.AX(9(l9'296-6S60 RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 32468, TO CONSOLIDATE EIGHT LOTS TOTALING 35.31 ACRES INTO ONE PARCEL, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATEL Y 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NNUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0201) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. ("UHS"), filed Planning Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"). B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this Project. E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report for the Project. F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 8, 2005. G. On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-05, recommending approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468 (PA04-0571). J. On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final Environmental Impact Report. K. On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT), PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )." L. On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. M. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-08, approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468 (PA04-0571). N. Two lawsuits were timely filed seeking to set aside the certification of the Final EIR and approval of the Project by the City Council of the City of Temecula. The lawsuit filed by Petitioners California Nurses Association (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 445394) was filed on February 24, 2006. The second suit, by Petitioners Citizens Against Noise and Traffic (Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 445411), was filed on February 24, 2006. O. On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court (hereafter, the "Court") ordered that the City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, and its certification of the Final EIR. In its Order, the Court concluded that the EIR failed to adequately address construction noise impacts, siren noise impacts and mitigation measures for traffic impacts, and did not address potential impacts from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) plumes potentially generated by three gas stations in the vicinity that might have the potential to migrate under the site, contaminate the soil on the site and generate unhealthful gas vapors. P. The Court also held that the Final Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare, and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency. All other aspects of the Final EIR were unchallenged during the challenge period, and thus are presumed to be adequate along with those aspects specifically upheld by the Court. Q. On July 12, 2007, a scoping session was held to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report ("Draft SEIR") for the Project. R. In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and circulated for public review from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007. S. On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application Nos. PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan) and PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. T. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-01 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Project, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project. U. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-06, recommending approval of the Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468 (PA07-0201). V. On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its approvals of Planning Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05- 0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010. W. On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468 (PA07-0201). at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter. X. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08- , entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND RESCINDING THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT AND CERTIFICATION OF A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO A COURT ORDER, ALL FOR THE TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH) APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959- 080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07- 0202, PA07 -0200, and PA07 -0201 )." Y. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Findinqs. makes the following findings: The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, Subdivision Ordinance, General Plan, and the City ofTemecula Municipal Code; B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act contract of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract; C. The site is physically suitable for the uses and proposed density as shown on the tentative map as proposed by the Applicant; D. The design of the proposed subdivision and the proposed improvements, with appropriate conditions of approval, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known fish, wildlife or habitat on the Project site, and the Project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. In addition, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared and certified prior to action on the Application; E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; and H. The subdivision is a commercial Project and is not subject to Quimby fees. Section 3. Conditional Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Tentative Parcel Map No. 32468, Planning Application No. PA07- 0201, consolidating eight parcels totaling 35.31 acres into 1 parcel, for the property generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel Nos. 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 subject to the specific conditions set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 08-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0201 Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map (TPM 32468) to consolidate eight parcels totaling 35.31 acres into one parcel located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial/Office Approval Date: Determined by City Council Action Expiration Date: Determined by City Council Action WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order rnade payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Six Hundred Seventy Dollars and seventy five cents ($2,670.75) which includes the Two Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollar and seventy five cents ($2,606.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County adrninistrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Environrnentallmpact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48- hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval docurnent that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the docurnents with an original signature to the Planning Department. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 3 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 TemecuJa Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 4 3. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harrnless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, frorn any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deerned for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, ernployees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 5. If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasinq plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. 6. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation rneasures identified within the Supplemental EIR for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project (SCH No. 2005031017). 7. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures contained in the approved Mitigation Monitoring Prograrn. 8. Landscaping installed for the Project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being rnaintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. All the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Public Works Department 10. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 11. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencernent of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 12. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Departrnent of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 5 13. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvernents contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 14. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or property owner. 15. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground. 16. The driveway on De Portola Road will be restricted to right-in/right-out/left-in movements. Fire Prevention 17. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan subrnittal. 18. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 - hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A). 19. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimurn fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be lo'cated no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 20. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 21. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate rnap, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 6 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 7 22. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or developrnent rnay take place until a rnitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 23. A copy of the rough grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 24. CR-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. 25. CR-2 If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recornmendations as to treatment and mitigation. 26. CR-3 A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. 27. CR-4 Tribal rnonitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and ground breaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer. 28. CR-5 The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 29. CR-6 All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. 30. A qualified paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation and comrnent on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological/ archaeological impacts. A meeting between the paleontologist/ archaeologist, Planning Department staff, and grading contractor prior to the commencement of grading operations and the excavation shall be arranged. The paleontologist/archaeologist or representative G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 8 shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. 31. The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians shall be contacted to afford the Band an opportunity to monitor ground-disturbing activities and participate in the decisions regarding collection and curation of any such resources. The applicant shall submit correspondence to the Planning Departrnent that confirms that such contact has been made prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 32. The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction agreernent/treatment plan with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians, prior to the issuance of grading perrnits that sets forth and contains theterms and conditions for the treatment of discoveries of Native American cultural resources. The agreement/treatment plan shall contain provisions for the treatment of all Native American cultural items, artifacts, and human remains that may be uncovered during the project. The agreement/treatrnent plan rnay allow for the presence of Pechanga tribal monitors during any ground-disturbing activities. The applicant shall submit a signed copy of the pre-construction agreement/treatrnent plan to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 33. The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to relinquish all cultural resources, including all archeological artifacts, that are found on the Project area to the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians for proper treatrnent and disposition. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 34. Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified archaeological rnonitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. This mitigation rneasure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 35. If any human remains are encountered on the project site, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the discovery will be terrninated immediately and the County Coroner's office and the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Indians will be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains. This mitigation rneasure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit. 36. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Public Works Department 37. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Ternecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 38. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 9 39. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention 40. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul- de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial (CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4). 41. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they rneet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level. 42. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the rnedian is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. 43. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 44. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accornmodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA.TPM.doc 10 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 11 45. The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Departrnent: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: i. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. ii. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) SCH No. 2005031017 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Departrnent. iii. This project is within a 100 year flood hazard zone. iv. This project is within a liquefaction hazard zone. v. This project is within an area identified by the City ofTemecula General Plan as being a sensitive area with regards to archeological and paleontological resources. c. In the event the project site is subdivided into multiple parcels, an Owner's Association shall be required to be formed. In addition, Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be submitted the City of Temecula for review and approval. CC&R's shall address the following: i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. iii. The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and it's residents. iv. The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. v. The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishrnent, operation, rnanagement, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and facilities. vi. The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. vii. The CC&R's shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. viii. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after rnaking due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perforrn, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 12 the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. ix. Every owner of a suite or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the cornmon areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. x. All open areas and landscaping shall be permanently rnaintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be subrnitted to the Planning and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. xi. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by the CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. xii. In the event the project site is subdivided into multiple parcels, An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA _1. The Conditions of Approval of [Tentative Tract]/[Parcel] Map No._ requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. _2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a deterrnination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consentto these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessrnent enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural rnatters. _3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval ofthe land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and federal, state or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. _4. These CC&Rs shall not be terrninated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director of Planning of the City of Temecula. xiii. In the event the project site is subdivided into rnultiple parcels, An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 13 CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for [Tentative Tract]/[Parcel] Map No. _ require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the conditions of approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without Iirnitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirernents, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 46. In the event the project site is subdivided into multiple parcels, no lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said rnutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of cornpliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 47. In the event the project site is subdivided into multiple parcels, CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 48. In the event the project site is subdivided into multiple parcels, three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Departrnent. 49. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. G:IPlanningI2007IPA07.0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPMIPlanningICOA.TPM.doc 14 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 50. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau e. Planning Department f. Department of Public Works g. Riverside County Health Departrnent h. Cable TV Franchise i. Community Services District j. Verizon k. Southern California Edison Company I. Southern California Gas Company 51. The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Irnprove Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer connections). i. Westbound a) The dedicated right turn lane into the main entry (Country Glen Way) shall be 12 feet wide and 200 feet long at a minimum b) Provide three (3) thru lanes c) Provide one (1) thru lanes ii. Eastbound a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide two (2) thru lanes and c) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane iii. Modify the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Country Glen Way. b. Improve De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer connections). c. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) - Provide southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 15 52. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) to include the installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not Iirnited to water and sewer) b. Private 28 foot wide ingress/egress road connecting to De Portola Road to include installation of paving and curb per the approved site plan c. Main Entry/Country Glen Way i. Provide a 245' continuous rnedian from Highway 79 South to main drive aisle ii. Southbound (exiting site) a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide a 20 foot wide shared thru/right turn lane iii. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide 53. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803 d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 e. Ail street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility g. All utility systerns including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. h. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground 54. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 55. Relinquish and waive right of access to and frorn Highway 79 South on the Parcel Map with the exception of two (2) openings as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. 56. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from De Portola Road on the Parcel Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Parcel Map. G;\Planning\2007\PA07.0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 16 57. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 58. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 59. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Parcel Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. 60. The. Developer shall comply with all constraints which rnay be shown upon an Environrnental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 61. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to subrnittal of the Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the irnprovements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shali be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shali have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 62. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to recordation of the Parcel Map or the issuance of any permit. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within their right-of-way. 63. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shali be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 64. Bus bays will be provided at all existing and future bus stops as deterrnined by the Department of Public Works. 65. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. " Fire Prevention 66. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate systern. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\PJanning\COA-TPM.doc 17 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 18 Public Works 67. Prior to the first building permit, Parcel Map No. 32468 shall be recorded, unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 68. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 69. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. 70. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Irnpact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Ternecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions irnplementing Chapter 15.08. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 19 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc ,20 Public Works 72. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase I, the following improvements shall be constructed and operational: a. Highway 79 South i. Traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Country Glen Way ii. Roadway improvements a) Westbound (i) Provide a dedicated right turn lane - 12 foot wide by 200 feet long (ii) Provide three (3) thru lanes (Iii) Provide one (1) left turn lane b) Eastbound (i) Provide two (2) left turn lanes (ii) Provide two (2) thru lanes and (Iii) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane b. Main Entry/Country Glen Way i. Provide a 245' continuous median from Highway 79 South to main drive aisle ii. Southbound (exiting site) a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes b) Provide a 20 foot wide shared thru/right turn lane iii. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide c. De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W) i. Half-width roadway improvements ii. 28 foot wide internal ingress/egress connection from project site to De Portola Road d. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) i. Southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap e. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) i. Installation of half-street improvernents, paving, curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) ii. Restricted to right in/right out vehicular movement G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 21 73. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance frorn the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 74. All public improvements, including traffic signal modification, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 75. The existing irnprovements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance darnaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. Fire Prevention 76. Prior to Occupancy and building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Departrnent vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Departrnent access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a rninirnurn AC thickness of .25 feet ( CFC sec 902). 77. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 78. Prior to issuance of Occupancy all manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4). G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201-Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 22 OUTSIDE AGENCIES G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\PJanning\COA-TPM.doc 23 79. The applicant shall corn ply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Departrnent of Environrnental Health's transmittal dated January 19, 2005, a copy of which is attached. 80. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated Novernber 19, 2004, a copy of which is attached. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0201 Temecula Regional Hospital TPM\Planning\COA-TPM.doc 24 i r I .:."....: .... , ~A. couNTy OF RIVERSIDE · coMMliNrrY HEAL. JH AGENCY ~ ~~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ;. , , I i i i. I I l I I i I ; I i I :. July 7, 2004 ffio ~ ',: ,~ n ,'IT i~ ~l ,I JL::" " :J ;:904 ~ IBY city ofTemecula Planning Deparbnent P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Dan Long RE: Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA04-0463 Dear Mr. Long: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA04-0463 to constIuct Temecula Regional Hospital and has no objections. Water and sewer services should be available in this area, although we have not iIi receipt of any information concerning those services. . . PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts. b) Any food establishments, (including v:ending machines), shall require three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (9~9) 600-6330. . c) Any hazardous materials handling or storage shall require a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (955- 5055) Sincerely, Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health SpcciaIist (909) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. cc: . Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Loul Enforcomeal Aseacy . p.o. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502.1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX (9091781-9653 . 4080 lemon Street, 9th Roo< RivelSide, CA 92501 lfmd u.. ODd Water Eagloeerlns . P.O. Box 1206. R1""rside, CA =.1206 . (909) 955-8980 . fi\X (909) 955-8903 . 4080 lemon Sbee~ 2nd Floor, RIverside, CA 92501 (@ Rancho later Board ofDirectori Johu B. BoadaDd Pre.idmt CPhaF.Ko . Sr.'ViocPreaidant StephenJ. c.-. Ralph B. Da1I7 _R."",,", Usa D. Bel'D:Wl JohnV.&.;u,1 om_ Brlaa.J.Bntq Gcoen>l_ Phillip L ForlH:s DiredarofFiDanal-Troeasurer E.P.-sob"~OIU Directoraf~ PCll'l7' R.Loaek Coo""",," LhuJa M. Frccuo D:btrictSecntary(AdcniniatratiYa "'"""'- o. Mlcbae1 Cowett Best Best'" KrlegerLLP Gcoen>l """""" , '. Iuly 12, 2004 ". SUBJECT: #~;:) ,/~ij:-' . ?'t'l. 12 ~~:> ~ h> ,p W<f" .....,>. . .Y> -2 o/@ :>'! ~~ WATERAVAILABILITY,TEME GIONALHOSPITAL; PARCELS NO.1, NO.2, AND NO.3 OF PARCEL MAP 13043; PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 6S13; AND PARCELS NO.1, NO.2, NO.3, AND NO.4 OF PARCEL MAP 13734; APN 959..oS0.001 THROUGH APN 959..oS0..o04, AND APN 959.0So.007 THROUGH APN 959..oS0.010; PA04-0462 AND PA04-0463 Dan Long, Project Planner. City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 - 9033 Dear Mr. Long: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundiuies of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off. site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the propef!:Y owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. All on-site public water facilities will require public utility e;lSements in favor of RCWD. The project proposes to relocate RCWD's 12-inch discharge pipeline and the associated easement from RCWD Well No. 120. This pipeline must be contained within a minimum 20-foot-wide easement, which is located such that no permanent structures or trees are located within its boundaries. The projeCt proponent should schedule a meeting with RCWD to confirm and detail these requirements. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICf ~//" ., '. f7" Mic ael. G. Meyerpe:er, P Development Engineering O41MM:mcOl8\PCF c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor Bud lones, Engineering Project Coordinator Baac:ho California Wakr Dl8crId 42135 W"UlCbelt.er Road . Poa.OfBce Bu. 9017 . Teblecula, califomia92589-9017 . (909) 296.6,900 . FAX (909) 29G-686O ARNowScnWARZENEGGER GOVERNOR Novernber 2, 2007 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE afPLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CLEARINGHOUSE AND PLANNING UNIT #:.~IlfP~~~ ,,~~ i*~" ~ ... ~ '.,-~ .Q 0);,)0.. -"'Av.-~ 'I:"OFCALI<U CYNTHIABRYANl' iO ~Cf!D\Wl!rrr In' I\(J'! 0 '7 2007 {Qt By -. Pla.lll'lmgDsIJEAltment Emery J. Papp City ofTemecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 RE: Ternecula Regional Hospital, (Supplemental EIR) SCH#2005031017 Dear Mr. Papp: We have reviewed your shortened review request and have determined that it is consistent with the criteria set forth in the written guidelines of the Office of Planning and Research for shortened reviews, and Section 21091 of the Public Resources Code. . The shortened review period for an EIR shall not be less than 30 days. The review process for the referenced project will start on November 2, 2007 and end on December 3, 2007. If you have any questions, please cOl'ltact Scott Morgan at (916) 445-0613. l..-Terry Roberts Director cc: file tv 1400 10th Street P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 FAX (916) 323-3018 www.opr.ca.gov City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive. Temecula, CA 92590. Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 . TemecuJa, CA 92589~9033 (951) 694-6400. FAX (951) 694-6477 October 31, 2007 Mr. Scott Morgan Senior Planner Governor's Office of Planning and Research State Clearinghouse 1400 Tenth Street, Suite 212 Sacramento, CA 95814 Subject: Request for Shortened Review of a Draft Supplemental EIR for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project Dear Mr. Morgan: The City of Temecuia Planning Department is the Lead Agency and has prepared a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Temecula Regional Hospital project. The City of Temecula is requesting a shortened (30-Day) review of the SEIR for this project. The shortened review is being requested because a Project EIR was previously certified for this project. A subsequent legal challenge ruling by the Riverside County Superior Court required the City of Temecula to prepare a Supplemental EIR for the project and a scoping session was held on July 12, 2007, where the City heard public input and testimony, and determined that a Supplemental EIR analyzing potential impacts identified in the attached NOP should be prepared for this project. The City of Temecula previously released for public review and comment, an Initial Study (SCH # 2005031017) for this project with the intent of preparing a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The comment period for the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was March 8, 2005 through April 6, 2005. No State Agencies commented on the original Initial Study. Comments from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service were addressed. F'urthermore, at a public hearing held on April 20, 2005, the City heard public input and testimony and determined that a Project EIR should be prepared. The scope of the project did not change and the City prepared a Project EIR that addressed potential impacts regarding aesthetics, air quality, hydrology and groundwater, land use and planning, noise, and transportation/circulation. The Project EIR was circulated for public review and comment from September 28, 2005 to October 28, 2005 after having requested and been granted approval of a shortened 30-day public review period. The City certified the Project EiR on January 24, 2006. Subsequent to certification, the Project EIR was challenged and a writ of mandate was issued by the Riverside County Superior Court to prepare a Supplemental EIR for the Project. The court held that the Project EIR noise analysis was not adequate, that the analysis of traffic mitigation measures was not adequate, and that the Project EIR should have, but did not, address the potential impacts of MTBE plumes in the underground water in vicinity of the site caused by leaking underground fuel tanks under remediation at three closely located gas stations. G:\Planning\2007\PA01-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA. SEIR\Planning\SCH Request - Shortened Review.doc .-.; In response to the writ of mandate issued by the court, the City of Temecula, as lead agency, has prepared a Supplemental EIR for the Project, which addresses the concerns cited by the court. The Notice of Completion is attached to this letter. Pursuant to Section 15105(d)(3) and Appendix K of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the City of Temecula believes that the project is not of statewide, regionai, or area wide significance, as defined in Section 15206 of the CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, the City of T emecula is requesting that the State Clearinghouse approve the request for a shortened review period for this project. We respectfully request that your agency provide a written response regarding the request for a shortened review period to Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner, City of Temecula, by November 2, 2007. If I may be of any assistance, please contact me directly at (951) 694-6400, or via e-mail at emerV.papp@.citvoftemecula.oro, Thank you for your consideration and quick response to this request. ;f.~~ Emery J. P p, AI(!"P Senior Planner Attachments: Notice of Completion Notice of Preparation Completed SCH Shortened Review Request Form Prior approval of 3D-day public review cc: State: CA Department of Fish & Game Regional Water Quality Control Board State Clearinghouse CA Department of Water Resources Federal: Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Bureau of Land Management Reoional: South Coast Air Quality Management District Western Riverside Councirof Governments Riverside Countv: Airport Land Use Commission Flood Control and Water Conservation District Health Department Planning Department Habitat Conservation Agency , t t lli f r l G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\SCH Request - Shortened Review.doc Riverside Countv (continued) Riverside Transit Agency Transportation Department Utilities: Eastern Municipal Water District Iniand Valley Cablevision Rancho California Water District Southern California Gas Southern California Edison Temecula Valley School District Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Verizon Other: Pechanga Indian Reservation Eastern Information Center Local Agency Formation Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA. SEIRIPlanninglSCH Request - Shortened Review.doc City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Completion SCH # 2005031017 Project Title: Temecula Regioual Hospital Contact Person: Emery J. Papp PA07-0198, General Plan Amendment; PA07-0199, Zone Change; PA07-0200, Title: Senior Planner Development Plan; P A07 -020 I, Tentative Parcel Map; and P A07 -0202, Conditional Use Pennit Phone: (95 I) 694-6400 Lead Agency: City ofTemecula Street Address: 43200 Business Park Drive City: Temecula, CA Zio: 92590 Project Location Within 2 miles City of Temecula, Riverside County State Hwy #: Interstate IS, Highway 79 South Cross Streets: North of Highway 79 South, Airports: N/A south of De Portola Road and west of Waterways: Temecula Creek Margarita Road Railways: None Assessor1s Parcel No.: Schools: Sparkman Elementary, Rancho Community (private school under 920-100-00 I through 13 construction) Total Acres: 35.31 CEQA Document Type [ ]NOP [ ]Negative Declaration [X]Supplement E1R [ ]EIR (Prior SCH #) r lEarly Consultation r iDraft EIR r 1Subseauent EIR r iOther Local Action Type [ ]General Plan Update [ ]Specific Plan [X]Rezone [ ]Annexation [X] General Plan Amendment [ ]Master Plan [ ]Prezone [ ]RedeveIopment [ ] General Plan Element [ ]Planned Unit Development [X]Use Permits [ ]Coastal Permit [ ]Community Plan [X]Site PlanIPlot Plan [X]Subdiyision of Land [ ]City Development Project rX10ther Conditional Use Permit Development Type . [ ]Residential: Units_ Acres __ [ ]Water Facilities: Type MGD - [X]Office: Sq.ft.140.000 Acres 35.31 Employees_ [ ]Transportation Type [ ]Commercial: Sq.ft._ Acres - Employees_ [ ]Mining: Mineral [ Jlndustrial: Sq.ft._ Acres_ Employees_ [ ]Power: Type [ ]Educational: [ ]Waste Treatment: Type [ JRecreational: [ ]Hazardous Waste: Type [X]Other: Hosnital408 160 Sn. Ft.. Cancer Center 10 000 So Ft.. Fitness Center 8000 Sn Ft. Project Issues Discllssed in Document [ ]AestheticNisual [ ]Flood PlainIFlooding [ ]SchoolslUniversities [ ] Water Quality [ ]Agricultural Land [ ]Forest LandJFire Hazard [ ]Septic Systems [X]Water supply/groundwater' [ ]Air Quality [ ]GeologiclSeismic [ ]Sewer Capacity [ ]Wetland/Riparian [ ]ArcheologicallHistorical [ ]Minerals [ ]Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grad [ ]Wildlife [ lCoastal Zone [X]Noise [ ]Solid Waste [ ]Growth Inducing [ lDrainagel AbsOlJltion [ ]Population/Housing Balances[ ]Toxic!Hazardous [ ]Land Use [ ]EconomiclJobs [ ]Public ServiceslFacilities [X]TrafficlCirculation [X]Cumulative Effects i iFiscal r lRecreationlParks r 1Vegetation r lOther: Light & Glare Present Land Use: Vacant CUI'rent Zoning: Professional Office and Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) General Plan Use: Professional Office Project Description: The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (PDO-9), Development Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, and a Conditional Use Permit. The General Plan Amendment is a request to eliminate the Z2 overlay area from the General Plan, which currently limits the height of buiidings aiong Highway 79 to 2 stories. The Zone Change is a request to change the zoning from Professional Office and DePortola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Temecula Hospital Plann.ed Development Overlay (PDO-9). The proposed PDO-9 allows a height of up to 115 feet for 30% of roof areas for the hospital bed towers. . The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit is a request to construct approximately 565,260 square feet of hospital, medical office, cancer center and a fitness rehabilitation center on 35.31 acres. The Tentative Parcel Mac is a reauest to consolidate eiaht (8) lots into one (1) parcel. a,\PJanning\2007\PA07-0J98 TemecuJ. Region.1 Hospitat GPA, SEIR\PlanninglNOCINOTlCEOFCOMPLETlON SEIR 10-31.o7.doc I On January 24, 2006, the City of Temecula certified a Project EIR for the project. Subsequent to certification, a legal challenge to the Project EIR was filed with Riverside County Superior Court. This Supplemental EIR was prepared to further analyze issues the court ruled were not adequately covered in the Project EIR. The issues identified by the court as needing further analysis include: construction noise impacts; siren noise impacts; clarification of project specific and cumulative projects traffic mitigation; and potential impacts to the site from under round meth tertia bu I ether lumes, under remediation, in roximit of the ro"ect site. Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Street. Sacramento. CA 95814 (916)445-0613 G:\Planning\2001\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital OPA, SEIR\Planning\NOC\NOTlCE OF COMPLETION SEIR lO-31-o7.doc 2 City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Preparation To; Distribution List (Attached) Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency: City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Phone Number: Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner (951) 694-6400 The City ofT emecula prepared a project EIR (SCH # 2005031 017) for the T emecula Regional Hospital project and circulated the project EIR for public review from September 28. 2005 through October 28. 2005 after obtaining approval of a shortened public review period from the State Clearinghouse. The City ofTemecula certified the EIR and approved the Temecula Regional Hospital project on January 24, 2006. The EIR and project approvals were challenged in Riverside County Superior.Court. On April 6, 2007 the Court ruled that portions of the final EIR for the project addressing traffic mitigation, nearby leaking underground fuel tanks, and noise were not sufficient. The issues cited in the Court's ruling are included on the attached Exhibif"-a." The City ofTemecula will be the Lead Agency and will prepare a supplemental EIR to address the issues identified in the Court's ruling. We need to know the views of your agency concerning environmental information germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities concerning the issues identified by the court. Your agency may need to use the Supplemental EIR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location (Exhibit "A"), and the potential environmental effects are contained in the attached materials. Staff did not prepare an Initial Environmental Study to determine the potential impacts of the project because a project EIR was previously prepared for the project and the Court has identified the issues to be addressed in the SEIR. Your agency previously received a copy of the prior draft project EIR, which includes the initial stUdy previously prepared for the project and responses to any comments your agency submitted on the draft EIR. The EIRthat was previously certified is available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Emery Papp at the address shown above. We will need the name for a contact person in your agency. R:\pappe\Hospltallssues\Suppfemental EIR 2007\NOP 07.05.07.doc I ., ! I r i, \< , ~ " ~ ~ ~ >'. t:- t~ t t~ !.i [ ~ a ~ ~ " Project Tille: Temecula Regional Hospital Project Location: City of Temecula, Riverside County, California Project Description: A proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (Planned Development Overlay District), Tentative Parcel Map, Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to consider a Regional Hospital Facility consisting of a 320-bed hospital approximately 408,000 square feet in size, two medical office buildings approximately 140,000 square feet in size, a 10,000 square foot cancer center, and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center, all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet, located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road. d5Z~#V Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning ,?-J-p7/ Date R:\pappc\Hospitallssues\SuPPlemental. EIR 2007\NOP 07-05-07 .doc ! I , I ! i I' I I I ~ t r: I'. i r ! I I " REVIEWING AGENCIES CHECKLIST KEY S=Document sent by lead agency X=Document sent by SCH T=Suggested distribution Resources Agency Boating/Waterways Coastal Commission Coastal Conservancy Colorado River Board Conservation --I Fish and Game Forestry Office of Historic Preservation Parks and Recreation Reclamation S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission -L Water Resources (DWR) Business, Transportation, & Housing -L Aeronautics L California Highway Patrol L Caltrans District No. -L -L Department of Transportation Planning {Headquarters) Housing & Community Development Other State & Consumer Services General Services -L aLA (Schools) Environmental Affairs Air Resources Board -L APCD/AQMD -L California Waste Management Board SWRCB: Clean Water Grants SWRCB: Delta Unit ...J: SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights -L Regional WQCB # 9 ( ) Youth & Adult Corrections Corrections Independent Commissions & Omees Energy Commission ..L Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy State Land Commission Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Food & Agriculture Health & Welfare L Health Services Public Review Period: Starting Date: November 5, 2007 Ending Date: December 5, 2007 Signature Date October 31. 2007 Lead Agency (Complete if Applicable): For SeH Use Only: Date Received at SCH City ofTemecula Date Review Starts 43200 Business Park Drive Date to Agencies Temecula, CA 92590 Date to SCH Contact: Emery J. Papp, AICP Clearance Date Phone (951) 694-6400 Notes: Applicant: Inland Valley Medical Center, Inc. Address 25500 Medical Center Drive Murrieta, CA 92652 Phone (951) 757-9796 G:~'lanning\2Q()7\PA07.0198 Temeeul. Region.l Hospital OPA, SEIRIPtanning\NOCINOTICEOFCOMPLETION SE1R 1O.31.07.doc 3 City of Temecula Planning Department PROJECT: Temecula Regional Hospital DISTRIBUTION DATE: July 6, 2007 CASE PLANNER: Emery J. Papp Agency Distribution List CITY OF TEMECULA: Building & Safety................................... (x) Fire Department..................................... (x) Sheriff .................................................... ( )() Parks & Recreation (TCSD}...................( x) Planning, Advance...............................,. ()() Public Works.........................................: (x) STATE: Caltrans .................................................( ) Fish & Game.......................................... ( x) Mines & Geology ...................................( } Regional Water Quality Control Bd........( x} State Clearinghouse (15 Copies)........... ( x ) Water Resources................................... (x) FEDERAL: Army Corps of Engineers....................... (x) Fish and Wildlife Service ....................... (x) Bureau of Land Managemenl................ (x) REGIONAL: Air Quality Management District............ ()() Western Riverside COG ........................ (x) R:\pappe\Hospltal tssueS\Supplemen1tll EIR 20a7WOP 07-os.o1.doc RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Airport Land Use Commission............... (x) Engineer................................................ ( ) Flood ControL........................................ (x) Health Department................................ ( x) Parks and Recreation............................ ( ) Planning Department...........:................. ( x) Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) ( x ) Riverside Transit Agency....................... (x) Transportation ....................................... (x) CITY OF MURRIETA: Planning ................................................ ( ) UTILITY: Eastern MuniCipal Water District........... ( x) Inland Valley CabJevision ...................... ( )( ) Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve... ( x) Southern California Gas. . .. .......... (x) Southern California Edison.................... (x) Temecula Valley School Districl...........: (x) Metropolitan Water Districl.................... (x) Verizon .................................................. ( x) OTHER: Pechanga Indian Reservation ............... (x) Eastern Information Center ................... (x) Local Agency Formation Commission... ( x ) RCTC ................................................... (x) Homeowners' Association ..................... (x) Los Ranchitos Santiago Estates County of San Diego, Planning Dept..... ( ) j I , I ! I I ff ~ r i! <.' ~ I Exhibit A > F !; , I I EXHIBIT B Notice of Preparation of a Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report (attachment) Lead Agency: City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive TemecuJa, CA 92590 Contact: Phone Number: Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner (951) 694-6400 Issues to be analyzed in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Hospital, as determined by the Riverside County Superior Court include the following: Hvdroloav and Groundwater - Off-site leaking underground fuel tanks and contaminated groundwater plume; Noise Issues - Construction operations noise and emergency vehicle siren noise; Traffic/Circulation Issues - Project specific mitigation and cumulative project mitigation. R:\pappe\HospitallssueS\$vpplementaf ErR 2007\NOP attachment.doc , f. , I , , f t , , r I: , I ! !: . j: . f; ~ . I Shortened Review Request Form Form E (To be filled oul and signed by the Lead Agency and submitted with DEIR Or Negative Declaration to SCH) To: State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 From: r.it-y nT 'i'&l-rnl'01"111s::. LeadAgCllCY: 43200 BUR10ess Park Drive Address Temecula, GA 92590 Phone#: (951 ) 694-6400 SCH# 2005031017 Conrnct:Emery PanD. ~~r.P, Rpninr Pls::.nnPT Project Title: Temecul a RelZional HosDital Project Location: Temecula Riverside COWlty city Explain "exceptional circumstances" (CEQA, Section 15205(d)) for requesting a shortened review: A Mitig.ted Neg"tive Declaration was circulated for public comment from March 8. 2005 rn April ~ ?OO~ R1th~pqt1p.nt-ly ;:! Prnjp.l"'t' ~TR W;q~ (,,;"',..111.<'1t'pl'1 for pll"1...... r"ommp.nr from September 28, 2005 to October 28, 2005. The Proiect ErR was certified on January 24, 2006. A Supplement EIR was prepared in response to a writ of mandate issued by Riverside County Superior Court. List responsible and trustee state agencies, as wen as any agencies that have commented on the project (Indicate whether the Respon- sible and Trustee Agencies have granted approval for this shortened review): Dept. of Toxic Substances. Control No Comment concerning Shortened Request N~Tivp Ampr;~An Rpri~~gp ~nmmi~~ion If Southern CA Association of Governments u As designated representative for tile lead agency, I verify, in their behalf, that there is no "statewide. regional. or areawide significance" to this project. Length of review being requested: 10 days 10/31/2007 Today's Date Got~ Revised January 2004 Emerv J. Papp Print Name :ll , I ! $ I 1 I ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA' Governor's O.fnea of Plan!1ing /l.pd Re.!l!l!!xel,i.... .. . State Clearinghouse and Pb.nning Unit ~.. '(..~~ . "l1'''''''~! S"",Walsh Dircolc' mold Sahwarzen:.ssel: OnVWtlQI:' September 26, 20Q5 Emery J. Papp , City ofTemecula : 43200 Business P~rk Drive Temccula, CA 92f90 RE: Temecu,la Re~onal Hospital (EJR) SCH#200S031 017 Dear Etl)cJ:)' J. Papp: . . We have revieweil your shoitened review request and bave determined tbat!i! is consistent with the criteria set f9rth in the millen g\lidc\ines of the Office of 1'lannin~ and Research for shortenedreview~ and SectionZ\091 oflhe PubiicResourcesCode. The shortened rc0ew period for an EIR shall nol be lesa than 30 days. The review process for lhe. referenced pr~ect will start on 09/2812005 and end on 10/28/2005. , If you have any q~~lions, please contact Scott Morgan at (916) 445-0613. , .2= +frr-- ~erry Robeits : . Director . 00: t1\e ! 1 ~ i. j" 'lioo TENTli 8TllEET P.O.llOX S044 SAOJl,,\MEN'rO, CALlFOllNIA. s6in.2-8044 i . TEL (916) 445-0813 PAX (916) 828.3018 _".op'.eA.gov . j: }: t ~ I Shortened Review Request Form Form E (To be tilted out and signed by the Lead Agency and submiued with DBIR or Negative Declaration to SCH) To: State ClearinghoUse P.O" Box 3044 Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 From: em OF Tl!MECIlIA. LeadAacrn;y; 43200 Bmdnesa Pa.rk Drive Addrcsr Temecula, CA 92590 . Pho.. #; (951 ) 694-6400 SCH # 2005031017 CoDlaCt: EMERY J. PAPl!, AICl! SIlID:OIl. l!LAlilmR PrQjcct Tide; 'IKMECllLA REGIONAL HOSPrrAL Project Location: TEllECllLA. City RIVERSIDE Coualy . .Explain "exceptional cl!(;.vm$(acCt$" (CEQA. ~ti~n 1 5WS(dJ) for requ6stin"a shortened review: An inf.t::ial study WCH #2005031017) for tbi.s pro1ect was previously released for public re'f.iev and comment with the mt"E.ut ~ p:teparhtg a. Hit:f.gated Negative Deelara1:ion. The cOmment period for the proposed Kttigated Negative Declarar10n was Harch 8. 2005 through April 6, 2()05. :110 Scate Agew;:ies c",""",uted ,,,. the original Initial S1:Udy. The "cope of Che projeet has not changed; hOllever, the City .is now rec(QlOJlend~g that a Focused Em be pr.ep~red.. The attached letter ~s sent to ag~nc.1e.s re.quest'1ng i:beir authol:';lz~tioD for a shortened revJ.ev.. The C;f.ty rec.eived no response.s 1:0 tMs lett.er.. List responsible and trustee state agencies, as weU 85 any agencies that have commented on the projecr (indicate wht;tha- the ReSPOII. sible and Trustee Agellcies have ~ted apptova] for this shorleJIed review)! . Native ADiericllIl lIerit<lg" COIIIlIlissioD 8/lS/05 No co........t conc~g shortened request ll.ivers:l.de Transit Agency 8/19/05 Pechanga Cultural :Resource" 8/29/05. No c.omment. concerning shortened request: No comment:. con.c.e.ruiug Bb.oX'tened J:eqveat As deslgns,cf:d rapresentative for t.he lead agency) I verify, in their behaJf. mot there ia no "statewide, regiOltal. Or areawide significance" to this project. .Lro:ngth of review beil)&" reQU~afcd; 30 day, D,lu"/os Tod!y's O~te EIlER! J. PAP1' Print Name .If:t ~ ' ~r.y~ Re<Jised January 2004 "" DATE: TO: SUBJECT: October 31, 2007 Responsible Agencies, Interested Parties, and Organizations NOTICE OF COMPLETION/NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR REGIONAL HOSPITAL PROJECT OF A DRAFT THE TEMECULA The City of Temecula is the Lead Agency and has prepared a draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the proposed Temecula Regional Hospital Project. Preparation of this SEIR is required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Environmental Impact Report that was originally prepared, circulated, and certified for this project was challenged in court and the court held that an SEIR was required to further address construction noise impacts; siren noise impacts; clarification of project specific and cumulative projects traffic mitigation; and potential impacts to the site from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether plumes, under remediation, in proximity of the project site. Proposed Proiect The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (PDO-9) Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map. The General Plan Amendrnent is a request to eliminate the Z2 overlay area from the General Plan, which currently limits the height of buildings along Highway 79 to 2 stories. The Zone Change is a request to change the zoning from Professional Office and DePortola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9). The proposed PDO-9 allows a height up to 115 feet for 30% of the roof area of the hospital. The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit is a request to construct approximately 565,260 square feet of hospital, medical office, cancer center and a fitness rehabilitation center space on 35.31 acres. The Tentative Parcel Map is a request to consolidate eight (8) lots into one (1) parcel. Proiect Location The proposed project is located north of Highway 79 South, south of De Portola Road and west of Margarita Road (Assessor's Parcel Numbers 920-100-001 through 13) City of Temecula, Riverside County, California. Sianificant Environmental Effects of the Proiect The Supplemental EIR (SEIR) was prepared to further analyze issues the court ruled were not adequately covered in the Project EIR. The issues identified by the court as needing further analysis include: construction noise impacts; siren noise impacts; clarification of project specific and cumulative projects traffic mitigation; and potential impacts to the site from underground methyl tertiary butyl ether plumes, under remediation, in proximity of the project site. The court also ruled that all other sections of the Project EIR are adequate under CEQA and are not subject to further review. Comments regarding the Temecula Regional Hospital Project are limited to the contents of the SEIR and the Technical Appendices for the SEIR. The Draft Supplemental EIR is available for public review and comment from November 5, 2007 through December 5, 2007. All comments on the Draft Supplemental EIR must be in writing and should be sent to Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590. Mr. Papp can also be contacted by phone at (951) 694-6400, by fax at (951) 694-6477, and bye-mail at emery. papp@citvoftemecula.ora. Copies of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report are available at the City of Temecula Pianning Department at 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula; and available for public inspection at the Temecula Public Library located at 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula; and the Grace Mellman Community Library located at 41 000 County Center Drive, Temecula. City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Completion SCH # 2005031017 Project Title: Temecula Regional Hospital Contact Person: Emery J. Papp PA07-0198, General Plan Amendment; PA07-0199, Zone Change; PA07-0200, Title: Senior Planner Development Plan; PA07-0201, Tentative Parcel Map; and PA07-0202, Conditional Use Permit Phone: (951) 694-6400 Lead Agency: City of Temecula Street Address: 43200 Business Park Drive City: Temecula, CA Zin: 92590 Project Location Within 2 miles City ofTemecula, Riverside County State Hwy #: Interstate 15, Highway 79 South Cross Streets: North of Highway 79 South, Airports: N/A south of De Portola Road and west of Waterways: Temecula Creek Margarita Road Railways: None Assessor's Parcel No.: Schools: Sparkman Elementary, Rancho Community (private school under 920-100-001 through 13 construction) Total Acres: 35.31 CEQA Document Type [ ]NOP [ ]Negative Declaration [X]Supplement EIR [ ]EIR (Prior SCH #) r lEarlv Consultation i iDraft EIR i l-Subseouent EIR i iOther Local Action Type [ ]General Plan Update [ ]Specific Plan [X]Rezone [ ]Annexation [X]General Plan Amendment [ ]Master Plan [ ]Prezone [ ]Redevelopment [ ]General Plan Element [ ]Planned Unit Development [X]Use Permits [ ]Coastal Permit [ ]Community Plan [X]Site PlanlPlot Plan [X]Subdivision of Land [ ]City Development Project [X]Other Conditional Use Permit Development Type [ ]Residential: Units_ Acres - [ ]Water Facilities: Type MOD_ [X]Office: Sq.ft.140.000 Acres 35.31 Employees_ [ ]Transportation Type [ ]Commercial: Sq.ft._ Acres - Employees_ [ ]Mining: Mineral [ ]Industrial: Sq.ft._ Acres_ Employees_ [ ]Power: Type [ ]Educational: [ ]Waste Treatment: Type [ ]Recreational: [ ]Hazardous Waste: Type [X]Other: Hosnital408 160 Sn. Ft: Cancer Center 10000 Sn Ft: Fitness Center 8 000 Sn Ft. Project Issues Discussed in Document [ ]AestheticNisual [ ]Flood Plain/Flooding [ ]Schools/Universities [ ] Water Quality [ ]Agricultural Land [ ]F orest Land/Fire Hazard [ ]Septic Systems [X]Water supply/groundwater [ ]Air Quality [ ]Oeologic/Seismic [ ]Sewer Capacity [ ]WetlandlRiparian [ ]Archeological/Historical [ ]Minerals [ ]Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grad [ ]Wildlife [ ]Coastal Zone [X]Noise [ ]Solid Waste [ ]Growth Inducing [ ]Drainage/Absorption [ ]PopulationIHousing Balances[ ]Toxic/Hazardous [ ]Land Use [ ]Economic/Jobs [ ]Public Services/Facilities [X]Traffic/Circulation [X]Cumulative Effects [ ]Fiscal r lRecreationlParks i 1V e~etation i lOther: Licl1t & Glare Present Land Use: Vacant Current Zoning: Professional Office and Planned Devetopment Overlay (PDO-8) General Plan Use: Professional Office Project Description: The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (PDO-9), Development Plan, Tentative Parcel Map, and a Conditional Use Permit. The General Plan Amendment is a request to eliminate the Z2 overlay area from the General Plan, which currently limits the height of buildings along Highway 79 to 2 stories. The Zone Change is a request to change the zoning from Professional Office and DePortola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9). The proposed PDO-9 allows a height of up to 115 feet for 30% of roof areas for the hospital bed towers. The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit is a request to construct approximately 565,260 square feet of hospital, medical office, cancer center and a fitness rehabilitation center on 35.31 acres. The Tentative Parcel MaD is a reouest to consolidate eiaht (8) lots into one (1) Darcel. G:\Planning\2007IP A07-Q198 Temecula Regional Hospital GP A, SEIR\PlanningINOCINOTICE OF COMPLETION SEIR 1O-31-Q7 .doc I On January 24,2006, the City ofTemecula certified a Project EIR for the project. Subsequenlto certification, a legal challenge to the Project EIR was filed with Riverside County Superior Court. This Supplemental EIR was prepared to further analyze issues the court ruled were not adequately covered in the Project EIR. The issues identified by the court as needing further analysis include: construction noise impacts; siren noise impacts; clarification of project specific and cumulative projects traffic mitigation; and potential irnpacts to the site from under round meth tertia bu ether lumes, under remediation, in roximi of the ro'ect site. Mail to: State Clearinghouse, 1400 Tenth Stree4 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916)445-0613 G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\NOCINOTICE OF COMPLETION SEIR 10-31-07.doc 2 REVIEWING AGENCIES CHECKLIST KEY S=Document sent by lead agency X=Document sent by SCH T=Snggested distribntion Resources Agency BoatingIW aterways Coastal Commission Coastal Conservancy Colorado River Board Conservation ....I Fish and Game Forestry Office of Historic Preservation Parks and Recreation Reclamation S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission ...L Water Resources (DWR) Business, Transportation, & Housing ...L Aeronautics L California Highway Patrol L Caltrans District No. -L ...L Department of Transportation Planning (Headquarters) Housing & Community Development Other State & Consumer Services General Services ...L OLA (Schools) Environmental Mfairs Air Resources Board ...L APCD/AQMD ...L California Waste Management Board SWRCB: Clean Water Grants SWRCB: Delta Unit ....I SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights ...L Regional WQCB # 9 ( ) Youth & Adult Corrections Corrections Independent Commissions & Offices Energy Commission 1:.... Native American Heritage Commission Public Utilities Commission Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy State Land Commission Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Food & Agriculture Health & Welfare ..L Health Services Public Review Period: Starting Date: November 5, 2007 Ending Date: December 5, 2007 Signature Date October 31, 2007 Lead Agency (Complete if Applicable): For SCH Use Only: Date Received at SCH City of Temecula Date Review Starts 43200 Business Park Drive Date to Agencies Temecula, CA 92590 Date to SCH Contact: Emery J. Papp, AICP Clearance Date Phone (951) 694-6400 Notes: Applicant: Inland Valley Medical Center, Inc. Address 25500 Medical Center Drive Murrieta, CA 92652 Phone (951) 757-9796 G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Plaoniog\NOCINOTlCEOF COMPlETION SEIR IO-31-o7.doc 3 City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Preparation To: Distribution List <Attached} Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Lead Agency: City of T emecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Ternecula, CA 92590 Contact: Phone Number: Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner (951) 694-6400 The City ofT emecula prepared a project EIR (SCH # 2005031 017) for the T emecula Regional Hospital project and circulated the project EIR for public review from September 28, 2005 through October 28, 2005 after obtaining approval of a shortened public review period from the State Clearinghouse. The City ofTemecula certified the EIR and approved the Temecula Regional Hospital project on January 24, 2006. The ErR and project approvals were challenged in Riverside County Superior Court. On April 6, 2007 the Court ruled that portions of the final EIR for the project addressing traffic mitigation, nearby leaking underground fuel tanks, and noise were not sufficient. The issues cited in the Court's ruling are included on the attached Exhibit "B." The City ofTemecula will be the Lead Agency and will prepare a supplernentalEIR to address the issues identified in the Court's ruling. We need to know the views of your agency concerning environmental information germane to your agency's statutory responsibilities concerning the issues identified by the court. Your agency may need to use the Supplemental EiR prepared by our agency when considering your permit or other approval for the project. The project description, location (Exhibit "A"), and the potential environmental effects are contained in the attached materials. Staff did not prepare an Initial Environmental Study to determine the potentiai impacts of the project because a project EIR was previously prepared for the project and the Court has identified the issues to be addressed in the SEIR. Your agency previously received a copy of the prior draft project EIR, which includes the initial study previously prepared for the project and responses to any comments your agency submitted on the draft EIR. The EIR that was previously certified is available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive. Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please send your response to Ernery Papp at the address shown above. We will need the name for a contact person in your agency. R:\pappe\Hospitallssues\Supplemental EIR 2007\NOP 07w05-07 .doc Project Title: Temecula Regional Hospital Project Location: City of Temecula, Riverside County, California Project Description: A proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (Planned Development Overlay District), Tentative Parcel Map, Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to consider a Regional Hospital Facility consisting of a 320-bed hospital approximately 408,000 square feet in size, two medical office buildings approximately 140,000 square feet in size, a 10,000 square foot cancer center, and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center, all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet, located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road. !ffl-tf! iJv Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning 1-J-tir Date R:\pappeIHospitallssues\Supplemental EIR 2007\NOP 07.05-07.doc Exhibit A /" ,...,.,.."" EXHIBIT B Notice of Preparation of a Draft Focused Environmental Impact Report (attachment) Lead Agency: City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Contact: Phone Number: Emery J. Papp, Senior Planner (951) 694-6400 Issues to be analyzed in a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula Regional Hospital. as determined by the Riverside County Superior Court include the following: HvdroloQV and Groundwater ~ Off-site leaking underground fuel tanks and contaminated groundwater plume; Noise Issues ~ Construction operations noise and emergency vehicle siren noise; Traffic/Circulation Issues ~ Project specific mitigation and cumulative project mitigation. R:\pappeIHospitallssuesISupplemental EIR 2007\NOP attachment.doc City of Temecula Planning Department PROJECT: Temecula Regional Hospital DISTRIBUTION DATE: July 6,2007 CASE PLANNER: Emery J. Papp Agency Distribution List CITY OF TEMECULA: Building & Safety ................................... (x) Fire Department..................................... (x) Sheriff .................................................... (x) Parks & Recreation (TCSD}................... (x) Planning, Advance...............................^. (x) Public Works.........................................: ( x) STATE: Caltrans .................................................( ) Fish & Game.......................................... (x) Mines & Geology ...................................( ) Regional Water Quality Control Bd ........ ( x ) State Clearinghouse (15 Copies)........... (x) Water Resources................................... (x) FEDERAL: Army Corps of Engineers....................... (x) Fish and Wildlife Service ....................... (x) Bureau of Land Management................ (x) REGIONAL: Air Quality Management District ............ (x) Western Riverside COG ........................ (x) R:\pappe\Hospltallssues\Supplemental EIR 2007\NOP 07~05.07.doc RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Airport Land Use Commission............... (x) Engineer................................................ ( ) Flood Control......................................... (x) Health Department ................................ (x) Parks and Recreation............................ ( ) Planning Departmenl............................. ( x ) Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) ( x ) Riverside Transit Agency....................... (x) Transportation ....................................... (x) CITY OF MURRIETA: Planning ................................................ ( ) UTILITY: Eastern Municipal Water District ........... (x) Inland Valley Cablevision ...................... ( x ) Rancho CA Water District, Will Serve... ( x ) Southern California Gas. . .. .......... (x) Southern California Edison.................... (x) Ternecula Valley School Districl............ (x) Metropolitan Water Districl.................... (x) Verizon .................................................. (x) OTHER: Pechan9a Indian Reservation ............... (x) Eastern Information Center ................... ( x ) Local Agency Formation Commission... ( x ) RCTC ................................................... (x) Homeowners' Association ..................... (x) Los Ranchitos Santiago Estates County of San Diego, Planning Depl..... ( ) STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 9, 2008 PREPARED BY: Emery J. Papp, AICP TITLE: Senior Planner PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning Application Numbers PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0200 (Development Plan), PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map), and PA07- 0202 (Conditional Use Permit) The proposed Project includes a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change (PDO-9), Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map. The General Plan Amendment is a request to eliminate the Z2 overlay area from the General Plan, which currently limits the height of buildings along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) to two stories. The Zone Change is a request to change the zoning from Professional Office and DePortola Road Planned Development Overlay (PDO-8) to Temecula Hospital Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9). The proposed PDO-9 allows a height up to 115 feet for 30% of the roof area of the hospital. The Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit are requests to construct approximately 566,160 square feet of hospital, medical office, cancer center and a fitness rehabilitation center space on 35.31 acres. The Tentative Parcel Map is a request to consolidate eight lots into one parcel. The Project is generally located north of Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South), south of DePortola Road, and approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road. RECOMMENDATION: D Approve with Conditions D Continue to: [8J Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial CEQA: D Categorically Exempt (Section) (Class) D Notice of Determination (Section) D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan [8J EIR C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 1 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. Date of Completion: July 3, 2007 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Professional Office (PO) and Planned Development Overlay District 8 (DePortola Road PDO-8) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: Very Low Density Residential (VL) Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South), Low Medium Residential (LM), Community Commercial (CC) Professional Office (PO), Highway/Tourist Commercial (HT), PDO-8 PDO-6 (Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay) East: West: Lot Area: 35.31 Total Floor Area/Ratio: 00.36 Hospital: Medical Office Building NO.1: Medical Office Building NO.2: Cancer Center: Fitness Rehabilitation Center: 408,160 square feet 80,000 square feet 60,000 square feet 10,000 square feet 8,000 square feet TOTAL: 566,160 square feet Landscape Area/Coverage: 33.3% Parking Required/Provided: 633/1,278 C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 2 BACKGROUND On January 24, 2006, the Temecula City Council voted unanimously to certify the Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and issue approvals for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Development Plan, Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project. The City Council Agenda Packet for January 24, 2006 is included in this Staff Report as Attachment No. 15. Subsequent to the certification of the Project EIR and Project approvals, two separate legal challenges were filed in Riverside County Superior Court by the California Nurses Association and Citizen's Against Noise and Traffic. The lawsuits alleged that the City did not follow proper procedures under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and that the City's Project EIR did not adequately analyze the impacts of the Project. In a Writ of Mandate issued by Judge Dallas Holmes on May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ruled that the City of Temecula did not properly analyze the Project impacts in the EIR related to an Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) plume in proximity of the Project site, siren noise in the vicinity of the Project site, construction noise, and the differentiation of Project's specific traffic mitigation and cumulative Project's traffic mitigation. In particular, the Court determined that the reliance on payment of fees to the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee program was not adequate mitigation for cumulative Project's impacts. The Court also ruled that challenges on other grounds, including: cumulative noise impacts; light and glare impacts; aesthetic impacts; landscape mitigation deferral; evaluation of biological resources; and land use consistency are denied because they were either adequately addressed in the Project EIR, or the petitioners failed to explain why these sections of the Project EIR were not adequate. In its ruling, the Court determined that the Temecula City Council "must set aside [its] approval of the Project and suspend all activity on the Project until it has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project into compliance with CEQA." Resulting from this decision, the applicant submitted the following new Planning Applications: PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone Change), PA07-0200 (Development Plan), PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map), and PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permit) on July 3, 2007, and paid for a City managed EIR to comply with the Writ of Mandate issued by the Court. Funds were deposited into a trust account which the City then used to hire Environmental Science Associates; Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers; Stearns, Conrad and Schmidt, Engineers, and Wieland Associates to prepare a Supplemental EIR to address the issues identified by the Court as requiring further analysis. On August 3, 2007, legal counsel for the applicant submitted an ex-parte application to the Court seeking a clarification on the Writ of Mandate issued by Judge Dallas Holmes. In his August 22, 2007 response, Judge Holmes ruled that only those issues identified in the Writ of Mandate as being inadequate need to be further analyzed, and that all other portions of the previous Project EIR are deemed to be adequate under CEQA. A full Project EIR would not be required and that the preparation of a Supplemental EIR would be an acceptable method of complying with the Court's ruling. The City prepared a Supplemental EIR for the Temecula Regional Hospital and circulated the Project for a 30-day public review and comment period, after obtaining approval from the State Clearinghouse for a shortened EIR review period. The City's request for a shortened review period was granted because the City had previously circulated a Project EIR and the scope of the Project has not changed. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 3 Because the City Council will be required to invalidate all prior certifications and approvals for the previous Project EIR and related Planning Applications, the Planning Commission must consider the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) and the Project as a whole, prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. Therefore, the following Project information is included. PROJECT HISTORY On June 30, 2004, Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. submitted applications for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan. On November 4, 2004, the applicant submitted a Tentative Parcel Map (32468) to consolidate eight lots, including a portion of the Pio Pico right-of-way (south of DePortola Road) into one lot. Staff originally prepared an Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH 2005031017) and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed Project. The original Initial Study was circulated for a 30-day public review period from March 4, 2005 to April 6, 2005. A City Council Subcommittee (Council Member Comerchero and Council Member Naggar) was formed to meet with neighborhood groups to discuss the Project. The City Council Subcommittee formally met with the applicant and staff on September 27, 2004 and October 11, 2004. Staff met with the Santiago Estates Home Owners Association on December 6, 2004, and held a community meeting on December 8, 2004. The community meeting notice was mailed to the surrounding homeowners within 600 feet from the Project site and approximately 45 residents and landowners were in attendance. The primary issues of concern that were raised through the various meetings with staff and the public included the following: . Traffic and circulation (access points) . Building height and views . Compatibility with residences . Noise . Helipad (location and number of flights) On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for this Project. Staff received comment letters regarding the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. In addition, citizens attending the Planning Commission hearing provided additional oral comments. The following is a summary of the written and oral comments provided to the Planning Commission: California Environmental Qualitv Act (CEQA) Issues . A Mitigated Negative Declaration is not appropriate for the Project . There are analytical gaps in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) . A Water Supply Assessment is required and has not been prepared . Mitigation Measures need to be more definite and certain . Lack of traffic impact analysis on Pio Pico . Lack of analysis concerning impacts to equestrian uses in the area C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 4 . Noise sources, noise impacts, and noise mitigation is not adequately addressed . Lack of analysis concerning visual and aesthetic impacts . Mitigation is required for unavoidable losses of riparian habitat due to bridge construction (Phase" Dartolo Road access) . Additional Burrowing Owl studies will be required Traffic/Circulation Issues . Increased traffic on DePortola will make it unsafe for equestrian uses . DePortola Road should not be four-lanes wide . Access from DePortola is not wanted by area residents; if required by City it should be gated for emergency access only . Access from Dartola should be in Phase I of the Project . All of Pio Pico south of DePortola should be vacated . Emergency room should be relocated Noise Issues . Increased traffic will lead to increased noise levels . Helipad and helicopter use will create noise impacts and will frighten (spook) horses . Provide sound walls to mitigate traffic noise Aesthetics . The hospital towers are too tall and not consistent in the area; views will be lost . Windows will reflect too much light and create glare Hvdroloqv and Groundwater . Due to increased runoff resulting from this Project, a storm water plan should be prepared . Contamination from existing underground storage tanks may pose a threat to groundwater if the contamination plume moves, however, once paved or built upon, this will be difficult to track The City Attorney acknowledged the receipt of these comments and recommended that an Environmental Impact Report be prepared for this Project. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the EIR for the hospital Project. It was determined that the EIR should evaluate impacts related to traffic and circulation issues, noise, aesthetics, and hydrology and groundwater. Staff met with the applicant's consultant to confirm the scope of the EIR, and the City oversaw the preparation of the document. The Draft EIR (SCH # 2005031017 -the same number as originally given to the MND) was circulated for public agency review and comment from September 28, 2005 to October 28, 2005. The State Clearinghouse granted a shortened review period of 30 days instead of 45 days, because the City had previously circulated a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this Project and the Project scope had not changed. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 5 November 16. 2005 Planninq Commission Meetinq On November 16, 2005, a Public Hearing was held before the Planning Commission to present the comprehensive Temecula Regional Hospital Project, the associated applications that required City Council approval, the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared for this Project, and to take public testimony concerning the proposal and the EIR. The Planning Commission was informed by the EIR consultant and staff that the responses to written comments on the EIR had not yet been completed, and the Planning Commission determined that a continuance would be in order to review the entire record prior to making a recommendation to the City Council. It was determined that the public hearing would be continued to the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission on December 7, 2005. It was also recommended that the City Council meeting, originally scheduled for November 22, 2005, be continued to December 13, 2005. Chairman Mathewson then opened the hearing for public comment. A total of 46 people submitted Request to Speak forms. Of these, 39 people spoke, 29 in favor and 10 against the proposed Project. During the public testimony portion of the public hearing, new evidence was presented with regard to potential leaking underground storage tanks and the potential for these to contaminate groundwater and an existing Rancho California Water District well site adjacent to the Project site. The California Environmental Quality Act requires jurisdictions to evaluate the impacts of a Project on the environment, and not the impacts of the environment on the Project. This pre-existing condition had been monitored by the State of California and it is the sole responsibility of the owners of the leaking underground storage tanks to remediate the conditions. However, because this issue was raised in a public forum, staff evaluated the potential threat of groundwater contamination beneath the site. Staff contacted the Rancho California Water District and verified that a domestic water well adjacent to the proposed hospital site is currently in production and has never tested positive for contaminants commonly found in groundwater that has been contaminated by gasoline. As a result, staff did not consider this to be an environmental impact that should be addressed in the EIR. Staff and the EIR consultant prepared responses to Agency comments and general public comments. CEQA requires local jurisdictions to respond in writing to Agencies that provided comments on the Draft EIR no less than ten days prior to the City Council's certification of the EIR. The City sent written responses to the Public Agency comments on November 12, 2005. Under CEQA, the City is not required to provide written responses to general public comments, or comments that were received after the Public Review period has closed. The City, however, chose to respond to all comments received up to and at the public hearing held on November 16,2005. The responses to comments are included as an attachment to the original Project EIR. Staff believed the responses to comments clearly demonstrated that the EIR and the Technical Appendices satisfactorily addressed all of the concerns raised by Agencies and the general public through the public review process. While some of the commenting public disagreed with the analyses contained in the EIR, staff believed that with the responses to comments, the EIR was sound and met the State CEQA Guidelines requirements for disclosure of public information. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 6 The original Project EIR stated that there would be Unavoidable Significant Impacts created by this Project that could not be mitigated to a level that is less than significant. State law, in particular the California Environmental Quality Act, permits a local jurisdiction to approve a Project having Unavoidable Significant Impacts, provided the local jurisdiction discloses this information in the EIR and can make the findings for a Statement of Overriding Consideration. These Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration are contained in the Staff Report of record for the November 16, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as Exhibit A of Attachment 3 which allows the City Council to render a decision to approve the applications put forth by Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. and to certify the EIR. A number of issues were raised at the November 16, 2007 Planning Commission Hearing. The following is a discussion of those issues: Phasinq There was some confusion regarding the phasing of this Project because phasing had been identified in three different ways: for the Project, for construction, and for traffic related mitigation. To clarify these issues, the Project was broken down into five Project phases. The construction schedule, however, was broken out into three phases. The first construction phase included the Project's Phase 1A and consisted of grading, clearing, and constructing Medical Office Building (MOB) NO.2 and surface parking. This phase is expected to last ten months. The second construction phase included Phase 1 B and consisted of the one-story hospital, six-story bed tower, and additional surface parking. This phase is expected to last 14 months. The third and final construction phase consisted of Project Phases, II, III, IV and V and included the second hospital bed tower, MOB No.1, Cancer Center, Fitness Center, and additional surface parking. This final construction phase is expected to last 12 months. Traffic mitigation was put into two general phases that were defined in the Conditions of Approval for this Project. For traffic mitigation purposes, Phase 1 was defined as the construction of a 170-bed hospital with an 80,000 square foot medical office space. For traffic mitigation purposes, Phase 2 was defined as the expansion to a 320-bed hospital plus an additional 60,000 square foot medical office space. Traffic Residents that live on DePortola Road and Pio Pico Road expressed concerns that the Project as proposed, with an access off of DePortola Road, would significantly impact the carrying capacity and Level of Service on these roads with the additional vehicle trips generated by this Project. The findings from the traffic study that was prepared for this Project were restated by the Public Works Director who indicated that Level of Service on both roads will remain below LOS "D." C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 7 Gas Plume An expert witness testified that a gas plume has been migrating from three gas stations in proximity of the hospital Project site, and this has been known for years. This issue was not included in the EIR. In the opinion of the expert witness, this potential environmental impact must be evaluated in the EIR. Alternative Sites Public speakers inquired as to what other sites the applicant had investigated prior to purchasing the subject property. The applicant responded that they had investigated two other sites, but the subject property had best met their needs. Public speakers also inquired why sites other than the Corona Family properties had not been considered in the Alternatives section of the EIR. Specifically, two City-owned sites were mentioned, the Diaz Road/Dendy Parkway (Campus) site, and a site generally located at the southwest corner of Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) and Interstate 15. December 7, 2005 Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission meeting which was originally continued to December 7, 2005 was convened and once again continued to allow the EI R consultant and staff additional time to complete the responses to the extensive comments presented at the November 16, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. As a result, the Planning Commission approved a motion to continue this item to January 5, 2006. January 5, 2006 Planning Commission Meeting The Planning Commission was presented with the responses to general public comments and information to respond to questions and issues raised at the November 16, 2005 Planning Commission meeting. The issues discussed and clarified at the January 5, 2006 Planning Commission meeting included the following: Traffic Staff re-evaluated some of the traffic impacts associated with the approval of this Project. Originally the City felt that providing a "second phase" connection to Margarita Road via Dartolo Road would be a good alternative that may lessen concerns regarding the Project's driveway access on to De Portola Road. The EIR analyzed the Dartolo Road access alternative and found that the connection actually created a significant traffic impact. The traffic impact is an operational problem created by adding additional turning movements to the Dartolo Road/Margarita Road intersection. The Dartolo Road/Margarita Road intersection was determined to be too close to the Margarita Road/Temecula Parkway intersection and was not enough vehicle stacking distance in the Margarita Road left-turn pockets to accommodate the additional Project turning movements. The Dartolo Road connection to Margarita Road would result in the intersection's break down and would force the signal's removal at an earlier date. The EIR showed that the DePortola Road driveway access had no significant traffic impacts. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 8 For these reasons staff recommended that the Condition of Approval for the Dartolo Road access to Margarita Road be removed. By removing this Condition of Approval, further biological studies were not required to facilitate this connection because the area would be avoided. Furthermore, staff concurred that there was no need for traffic mitigation on Pio Pico. Staff believed that the traffic consultant's observation that Pio Pico would not serve as a route for Hospital access was correct. To mitigate the concern that traffic may be encouraged to use Pio Pico, the City required that the DePortola Road access not align with Pio Pico and it was moved approximately 700 feet to the east of Pio Pico. The estimated traffic volumes that would be added to local roads as a result of this Project would not cause the Level of Service for Pio Pico to exceed the City's goal of Level of Service "D". Gas Plume An investigation was completed on the subject property that included testing soil conditions at ten locations on the subject property. These locations were selected because they are within the proposed footprints of the hospital and medical office buildings. The tests checked the soil vapor at approximate depths of five feet at each location. The results of this test show that there was no evidence of soil contamination due to gases escaping from the plume and making their way into the soil. The soil tests did not confirm whether or not the groundwater at this location is contaminated with constituents found in gasoline and other petroleum products. However, the Rancho California Water District, who owns and operates a domestic well adjacent to the site, indicated that the domestic well adjacent to the subject site was not in danger of contamination. Rancho California Water District has verified that the most recent test samples from this well have not detected constituents commonly found in groundwater that has been contaminated by gasoline. Alternative Sites Two additional sites were discussed by public speakers at the November 16, 2005 Planning Commission meeting as potential locations for the proposed hospital. The first is a 32-acre property west of Diaz Road and north of Dendy Parkway which is owned by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula. The Agency had entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement for the sale of this property to the AGK Group, LLC for the development of a mixed-use Project that includes a higher education center, approximately 280 apartment units, of which 50 are reserved for affordable housing, retail, a conference facility, and a child care facility. The City also had a Development Agreement in place with the developer of this Project and also had approved plans for the Project. This site, therefore, was not available for the hospital. A second site is a property west of 1-15 at Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South), which was purchased for the sole purpose of upgrading the 1-15/Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) interchange. The property is approximately 30 acres, but less than 20 acres is out of the flood zone. The property will have limited access after the interchange work is done. The property was purchased with regional transportation funds and the City has a contractual obligation to use the property for the interchange improvements. This site was, therefore, not available for the hospital. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 9 The applicant also presented information to support the height of the proposed five- and six- story hospital bed towers. The applicant asserted that based on the number of proposed beds needed in the City, the proposed design was the most efficient to protect the life and safety of patients. The Planning Commission struggled with the height issue of the proposed bed towers, but ultimately passed a motion to recommend the City Council support the Project as proposed. The applicant contended that the bed towers could not be redesigned to a lower height without sacrificing patient care and without jeopardizing its compliance with State regulatory requirements and that any reconsideration of the design would result in additional delays of up to two years in providing necessary hospital services for the community. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to move forward with the current proposal, noting that the height is an issue and should be discussed further by the City Council. January 24, 2006 City Council Meeting Staff presented the proposed Project and identified issues of concern. In addition, an Environmental Impact Report was presented, which identified potentially significant environmental impacts. Staff included Conditions of Approval and prepared a Mitigation Monitoring Program that addressed Project concerns and reduced the potentially significant environmental impacts to a less than significant level, with the exception of short-term, long- term, and cumulative air quality impacts; noise impacts related to helicopter flights; and cumulative traffic and circulation impacts for which a Statement of Overriding Consideration was been prepared. On January 5, 2006, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council review and accept the responses to comments as adequately addressing the concerns raised by reviewing agencies and the general public, and recommended that the City Council of the City of Temecula certify the Project EIR and approve Planning Applications PA04-0462, PA05- 0302, PA04-0463, and PA04-0571. The City Council unanimously voted to adopt the Statements of Overriding Consideration for the Project, to certify the Project EIR, and approve each of the Planning Applications associated with the Project. Legal Challenges On February 24, 2006, the California Nurses Association and Citizens Against Noise and Traffic filed petitions with Riverside County Superior Court seeking to invalidate the City Council's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital Project. On May, 3 2007, Judge Dallas Holmes issued his ruling which found that portions of the Project EIR for the Temecula Regional Hospital did not comply with CEQA and ordered that the City set aside its approval of the Project until the issues identified by the Court were further evaluated. To comply with the Court's order, the City prepared a Supplemental EIR. PROJECT ANALYSIS The Project has not changed in scope since it was originally considered by the Planning Commission in January 2006. However, because the City Council must set aside its prior certification of the Project EIR and related Planning Application approvals, the Planning Commission must consider the entire record before making a recommendation to the City C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 10 Council regarding the Project approvals and adequacy of the Supplemental EIR. Below is an analysis of each Planning Application which must be acted upon in the following order: PA07-0198, General Plan Amendment The General Plan Amendment is a request to eliminate the subject properties from the Future Specific Plan Z overlay, Figure LU-4 in the General Plan Land Use Element. The description and objectives of the Future Specific Plan Z Overlay contains language that requires Projects adjacent to single-family residents to be limited in height to one or two stories. In order to accommodate the hospital, it is necessary to remove the height restriction. Functionally, the hospital needs the two five- and six-story bed-towers. By removing the properties from this Overlay, the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Professional Office will guide the development of these properties. The description of Professional Office in the General Plan is as follows: "Primarily single or multi-tenant offices, including legal, design, engineering, medical, corporate, government, and community facilities." The proposed hospital and associated medical offices are consistent with this General Plan designation. Further, the proposed hospital meets Goal 1 of the City's General Plan Land Use Element which states that the City wishes to have a "diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses." Additionally, Policy 1.8 under the Land Use Element Goal 1 encourages "future development of a community hospital and related services, as well as a community college, major college or university." PA07-0199, Zone Change Planned Development Overlays (PDO) are mechanisms by which an applicant can create special standards for the development of their property (i.e. setbacks, landscape requirements, height restrictions, etc.). The Temecula Hospital PDO-9 (Attachment 5) was filed to allow flexibility with respect to the height of the hospital. All other development standards for these properties will revert back to the Development Code standards contained in the Professional Office Zone. The Official Zoning Map for the City will also be amended to show the location and boundaries of the proposed PDO-9. The Professional Office underlying General Plan Land Use for site will remain unchanged. PA07-0202, Conditional Use Permit The underlying PO zoning regulations require a Conditional Use Permit for hospitals and helipads. The proposed hospital will be a full service facility operating 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Services provided at the hospital will include emergency treatment, outpatient surgical services, inpatient surgical services, acute care inpatient services, intensive and cardiac care services (ICU/CCU). In addition, comprehensive departments of radiology/ imaging, cardiology, laboratory and other outpatient services will be provided. The Project will not include a trauma center. The helipad is located on the north side of the hospital, on the eastern portion of the site and would only be used to transport patients requiring specialized treatment to other facilities. The applicant stated there would be two or three flights per month on average, but the permit to be C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 11 obtained from the Caltrans Division of Aeronautics for a Special Use Helipad would permit up to six landings per month. In a mass casualty event, these limits will not apply. (Section 3527, Title 21, California Code of Regulations.) With the findings for a Statement of Overriding Consideration, EIR Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval, the CUP will be consistent with policies contained in the General Plan and compatible with the surrounding land uses. PA07-0200, Development Plan The Development Plan consists of a 408,160 square foot hospital, a helipad, two medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet on 35.31 acres. The Development Plan will be constructed in five phases. Phase IA will consist of site grading, demolition of any remaining existing structures on site, construction of a three-story (60-foot high), 60,000 square foot medical office building, Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) access points and surface parking. Phase IA is expected to take ten months to complete. Phase I B will consist of construction of the one-story main hospital building comprising approximately 162,650 square feet, a six-story (106-foot high) bed-tower comprising approximately 122,755 square feet, DePortola Road access point and additional surface parking. Phase IB is expected to take 14 months to complete. Phase II will expand the hospital to its ultimate, maximum 320-bed configuration with the addition of a five-story (83.5 foot high) bed-tower comprising approximately 122,755 square feet, and construct the access to Dartolo Road. Phase III will add a four-story (73-foot high), 80,000 square foot medical office building. Phase IV will add a one-story (27-foot high), 10,000 square foot cancer center and additional surface parking. Phase V will add a one-story (27-foot high), 8,000 square foot physical therapy and fitness center. Phases II through Vare expected to be constructed concurrently and take approximately 12 months to complete. Access/Circulation There are two primary access points, both of which are located along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South). The primary access point along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) aligns with Country Glen Way and will require the modification of the traffic signal to allow full turning movements (DP Condition No. 103d.) The other access point along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) is located further west and will be a right-in, right-out only access point. A secondary driveway is located at the northeastern portion of the Project site connecting to DePortola Road and will be designed to prohibit left turns from the Project site (right-out only). The Project site will also have internal access connecting with the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay to the west. The original Project proposal did not include an access point to/from DePortola. Staff required the applicant to provide a secondary driveway access directly to DePortola. Staff believes that alternative access points are necessary due to the potential for unforeseen closures along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South), which have historically and may again in the future, close down Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South). Additional access points that are not C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 12 located along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) will allow the ingress and egress of emergency vehicles to remain highly functional at all times. This DePortola access point is a secondary driveway designed in a manner that will not permit left hand turns exiting the Project site. This will require all traffic leaving the Project site onto DePortola Road to travel east towards Margarita Road, away from the residential area. The access and circulation of the Project will not adversely impact the adjacent roadways. The following improvements are required to be installed and operational prior to occupancy of any building in Phase I; Installation of traffic signal at Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) and Country Glen Way, including a dedicated right turn lane along the westbound lanes and restriping of through lanes and turning lanes at this intersection; DePortola Road access point and roadway improvements; Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) and Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) southbound and eastbound right turn signal overlap; and improve Dona Lynora with half street improvements and restrict movements to right in/right out vehicular movements. Based on the Development Code parking regulations, the site is required to provide a minimum of 633 parking spaces and 1,278 spaces have been provided. The parking lot will be constructed in phases to coincide with the development of each building. The Project is consistent with the parking standards as set forth in the Development Code for hospital and office facilities. Site Desiqn/Architecture The hospital building will be constructed in two phases. The first phase will include the single- story main hospital building and six-story tower housing approximately 170 beds. The second phase includes the five-story tower housing the remaining 150 beds (320 beds total). The Project proposes a Spanish style architectural design for all buildings. The building design features the use of earth-toned stucco, terra cotta tile roof, bronze tinted glass and Indian Red tile at the base. An octagon-roofed rotunda divides the hospital towers. The hospital, medical office buildings and the cancer center each include a porte-cochere covered entry. The site design and architecture, as conditioned, will comply with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Project site is designed in a manner that complies with the development standards. The colors and materials are consistent with the Spanish architectural style proposed by the applicant. Each building maintains the three components required for each building, including a tile base, stucco body and Spanish roof. The applicant added a band below the fourth story windows of the towers to break up the massing, which reduces the blank wall appearance. In addition, the abundance of windows on each building breaks up the amount of solid surface. A decorative rotunda between the towers adds interest from Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) and reduces the massing by providing a separate feature between the towers. The entry of the hospital, medical office buildings and cancer center all include a decorative covered canopy. The covered entry defines the primary entry for each building as a focal point. The applicant has also proposed a decorative boulder water feature at the main entrance of the hospital to further accentuate the entry. The hospital building is required to obtain building permits from the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) and is exempt from City structural review and building permits. The two medical office buildings and fitness rehabilitation center will be required to obtain building permits from the City of Temecula Building Department. As a C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 13 result of OSHPOD's jurisdiction to review plans for this Project, staff has tailored the timing thresholds for the Conditions of Approval of the hospital building only to coincide with OSHPOD submittal requirements. Buildinq Heiqht and Views The primary issues of concern with regard to building height and views, includes the two towers that are five- and six-stories. The applicant has stated that the design of the hospital is primarily based on internal functional relationships. The various uses and functions inside of the building must be located adjacent to other critical uses. This includes nurse stations, care rooms, treatment facilities, equipment as well as elevators, stairs and window placement. With the "form follows function" concept in mind, the design of the building is severely limited in what can be changed in regard to tower location, layout and movement (or relocation) of functioning areas. Staff understands the concerns of the residents located to the north of the hospital properties with respect to the height of the two hospital towers. However, given that the two towers must be this height to allow the hospital to maintain it's functionality, and given that the nearest hospital tower is set back approximately 210 feet from the nearest residentially zoned property and approximately 630 feet from DePortola Road, and that a 238-foot wide landscape zone is provided along the northern edge of the hospital property between the hospital and DePortola Road, staff believes that the visual impacts of the towers have been adequately mitigated. Landscapinq Perimeter landscaping will consist of a 25-foot wide bermed landscape planter along Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South), consisting of 24-inch box and 15-gallon California Pepper trees, Sycamores and assorted shrubs; DePortola Road and the remainder of the north property line consists of a minimum 40-foot wide landscape/equestrian trail buffer consisting of 24-inch box and 15-gallon Afghan Pines and Silk Trees; a 50-foot wide planter along the western property line of assorted street trees; and a minimum 20-foot wide landscape buffer consisting of an informal planting of natural turf and assorted trees along the eastern property line. The overall site will include 20% 36-inch box (approximately 176 trees), 30% 24-inch box, and 50% 15- gallon trees. The proposed landscape plan, as conditioned, will comply with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The Project is consistent with the 25% required landscape area (33% proposed). The applicant has proposed and/or is conditioned to provide landscape berms adjacent to public streets to screen the parking lots. Staff has included Conditions of Approval to further buffer the residential area from the Project by requiring berms and mature evergreen trees such as Afghan Pines and California Pepper trees between the Project site and residential areas to the north (DP Condition No. 78). PA07-0201, Tentative Parcel Map The Tentative Parcel Map is a request to consolidate eight parcels into one parcel. Included as part of the map is a request to abandon the southern portion of Pio Pico Road. The portion requested to be abandoned is not built at this time. The proposed parcel map is consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 14 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on December 8, 2007 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION For the original Project, staff prepared a Project Environmental Impact Report and recommended Mitigation Measures for the proposed Project. A Draft Project Environmental Impact Report was prepared by P & D Consulting and submitted to the City on September 28, 2005. The City prepared a shortened CEQA review request that was authorized by the State Clearinghouse on September 26, 2005. As a result, the public review period for the original Project was from September 28, 2005 through October 28, 2005. The following impacts were identified in the Draft EIR as Unavoidable Significant Impacts: . Short-term, long-term, and cumulative air quality impacts . Noise impacts associated with the maximum potential number of emergency helicopter flights . Cumulative traffic and circulation impacts The following impacts were identified in the Draft EIR as Potentially Significant Impacts that can be mitigated: . Aesthetics - Light and glare . Noise - Operational impacts . Transportation - Project impacts The following mitigation measures were recommended for the Project. IMPACT AREA MITIGATION Air Quality AQ-1. The applicant/permittee shall coordinate with the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) for a final location, design, and type of staging area (or turn- out) appropriate for the Project site. Written authorization and final approved design plans shall be submitted to the City of Temecula Planning Department. AQ-2 The applicant/permittee shall incorporate and encourage Transportation Demand Management (TOM) techniques for reducing vehicle trips during construction, as well as during the daily operations of the hospital facility. TOM techniques shall include but not be limited to the following: encouraging car and vanpooling, and offering flex hours and/or flex schedules during the on-going operation of the facility. Written proof of such program shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of a grading permit for construction activities and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the operation of the medical offices. AQ-3 The applicant/permittee shall incorporate e ne rgy efficiency standards appropriate for medical facilities and professional office buildings, as defined bv State of California requlations. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 15 AQ-4. The applicant/permittee shall submit a final landscape plan for the Project site incorporating native drought-resistant vegetation and mature trees (15 gallon, 24-inch box and 36-inch box). If more than 100 days elapses from the time grading is complete and beginning of construction, the City of Temecula may require temporary landscaping to reduce the amount of dust and to prevent dust and erosion, with such temporary landscaping to be installed at the applicant/permittee's expense. AQ-5. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit and during the duration of construction activities, the applicant/permittee shall verify in writing (to the Planning Department) that all earth-moving and large equipment are properly tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In addition, alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used where feasible. Construction equipment should be selected and deployed considering the lowest emission factors and highest energy efficiency reasonably possible. AQ-6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a watering program shall be submitted to the City of Temecula Public Works Department for approval. Said program shall include control of wind-blown dust on site and on adjacent access roadways. The City Public Works Director reserves the right to modify this requirement as necessary based upon the circumstances that present themselves during the Project construction. AQ-7. The applicant/permittee shall prepare and submit a comprehensive Fugitive Dust Control Plan to the City of Temecula, including compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 - Nuisance and Rule 403 - Fugitive Dust. The Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall include applicable best available control measures included in Table 1 and Table 2 of Rule 403 during grading and construction such as the following examples listed below: . Soil stabilization methods such as water and environmentally safe dust control materials shall be periodically applied to portions of the construction site inactive for over four days. . Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days after active operations have ceased. . Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days of grading completion. . Water all roads used for vehicular traffic at least twice per day, at least once in the morning and at least once in the afternoon. . Restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour. . Apply water or chemical stabilizers to at least 80 percent of the surface area of open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust or install temporary coverings. . Cover haul vehicles prior to exiting the site. . Direct construction traffic over established haul routes. The Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the SCAQMD prior to the commencement of grading and excavation operations. Compliance with The Fugitive Dust Control Plan shall be subject to periodic site monitoring by the City. AQ-8. During the course of the Project grading and construction, the applicant/permittee shall post signs on the site limiting construction-related traffic and all general traffic to 15 miles per hour or less. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 16 AQ-9. The applicant/permittee shall establish construction equipment and supply staging areas located at least 500 feet from the nearest property line of a residentially improved parcel. AQ-10. The applicant/permittee shall properly maintain all waste-related enclosures and facilities and comply with the state emission controls to ensure against Project site related odors during construction and subsequent use. AQ-11 All trucks exporting and/or importing fill to/from the Project site shall use tarpaulins to fully cover the load in compliance with State Vehicle Code 23114. Material transported in trucks off site (to and/or from the site) shall comply with State Vehicle Code 23114, with special attention to Sections 23114(b) (2), (F) (b), (F) (e) (2), and (e) (4) as amended. Material transported on-site shall be sufficiently watered or secured to prevent fugitive dust emissions. Lower portions of the trucks, including the wheels, shall be sprayed with water, which shall be properly managed so as to prevent runoff, to reduce/eliminate soil from the trucks before they leave the construction area. AQ-12. During the course of the Project grading and construction, the applicant/permittee shall ensure the sweeping of adjacent streets and roads to prevent the placement or accumulation of dirt in the roadway. Sweeping of adjacent streets and roads shall be done as necessary, but not less than once per day, at the end of each day of grading and/or construction. AQ-13. During periods of high winds (i.e., wind speed sufficient to cause fugitive dust to impact adjacent properties, generally wind speeds exceeding 20 miles per hour, averaged over an hour), the applicant/permittee shall curtail all clearing, grading, earth moving and excavation operations as directed by the City Engineer, to the degree necessary to prevent fugitive dust created by on-site activities and operations from being a nuisance or hazard, either off-site or on-site, or as determined by the City Engineer at his sole discretion. AQ-14. The applicant/permittee shall use zero Volatile Organic Compounds (VaG) content architectural coatings during the construction and repainting of the Project to the maximum extent feasible. This measure will reduce VOC (RaG) emissions by 95 percent over convention architectural coatings. The following websites provide lists of manufacturers of zero VOC content coatings: http://www.aqmd.gov/prdas/brochures/Super-Compliant_AIM. pdf http://www . delta- institute. org/pu bl ications/pai nts. pdf AQ-15. The Project site shall be watered down no less than three times (not including the morning and evening water down) during construction and/or grading activities to reduce dust. AQ-16. All refuse areas shall be completely enclosed and include a covered roof subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Refuse areas shall be maintained within an enclosed structure and covered at all times, except during pick-up times for off-site removal. AQ-17. The applicant/permittee shall provide a clear path of travel for pedestrians, including directional signs to/from the public streets (De Portola C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 17 Noise Road and Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)) to promote alternative transportation. N-1 Once the mechanical equipment (including emergency generators) is fully operational upon completion of Project construction, the applicant/permittee shall conduct continuous, 24-hour noise monitoring for a period of one week. Such monitoring shall be conducted by a certified acoustical engineer. If the noise levels exceed land use/noise compatibility threshold levels set forth in the City of Temecula General Plan or other City- adopted criteria that may be in place at the time, the applicant/permittee shall implement measures to achieve the thresholds or other adopted criteria. Such measures may include, but not be limited to, noise attenuation barriers, equipment baffling, or other approaches deemed appropriate by a certified acoustical engineer. Once the mitigation has been implemented, the acoustical engineer shall file a report with the City documenting compliance. N-2 Helicopter flights shall be limited to emergency-only circumstances for critical patient transport. The applicant/permittee shall apply for a Special Use Helipad Permit for an Emergency Medical Services Landing Site, as provided for in the California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Section 3527, Airport and Heliport Definitions. This permit allows, over any 12-month period, no more than an average of six landings per month with a patient or patients on the helicopter, except to allow for adequate medical response to a mass casualty event, even if that response causes the site to be used beyond these limits. N-3 Helicopter pilots responding to calls for patient transport shall be informed of a preferred approach and departure heading of 1350 southeast. N-4 Truck deliveries to the hospital loading dock shall be limited to four per day, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. N-5 Mechanical ventilation shall be provided for all medical and office buildings on the site to ensure compliance with interior noise standards established in the General Plan. N-6 All demolition and construction activities shall be limited to the hours and other restrictions set forth in the City of Temecula Municipal Code. N-7 All construction equipment shall be tuned and muffled to minimize noise. Transportation N-8 During demolition and construction operations, the applicant/ permittee shall stage all stationary equipment operations as far as possible and practical from surroundinr:l residential properties. T-1. Signalize the main Project site access from Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) opposite Country Glen Way with the following configuration: Westbound: 1 right-turn lane 3 through lanes 1 left-turn lane Eastbound: 2 left-turn lanes 2 through lanes 1 shared throur:lh/rir:lht lane C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 18 Northbound: 1 left-turn lane 1 shared through/right lane Southbound: 2 left-turn lanes 1 shared through/right lane (20 feet wide) T-2. The Project applicant/perrnittee will pay Riverside County Transportation Uniforrn Mitigation Fees (TUMF) to rnitigate curnulative irnpacts to the Ternecula Parkway (Highway 79 South) intersection at 1-15. T -3. The Project applicant/perrnittee will contribute a fair share toward the provision of the following roadway irnprovernents to address the Project's contribution toward curnulative irnpacts: Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/1-15 Southbound Ramps Additional southbound left-turn lane Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/1-15 Northbound Ramps Additional eastbound through lane, plus convert westbound right lane to free right turn Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/La Paz Road: Widen southbound rnovernent to dual left turn lanes and one shared through/right lane Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/Pechanga Parkway Additional northbound left-turn lane, plus eastbound and northbound free right-turn lanes Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/Project Driveway/Country Glen Way Signalize and provide dual eastbound left-turn lanes and dual southbound left-turn lanes with a shared through/right-turn lane. Provide a dedicated right-turn lane for westbound approach Temecula Parkway (Highway 79 South)/Redhawk Parkway /Margarita Road and provide southbound and eastbound dual left and right-turn traffic signal overlaps Aesthetics T-4. Irnprovernents on the Project site shall include a driveway onto De Portola Road developed to the specifications of the Public Works Director. A-1. Prior to issuance of a building perrnit, City staff shall verify that a photornetric plan has been subrnitted which details the proposed light levels for the entire Project site onto adjacent Project boundaries and vertical fugitive light, including rneans to rnitigate. Corresponding criteria for helicopter/heliport uses and arnbulance light use and operations shall also be prepared and include rneans to rnitigate potential light irnpacts. A-2. All windows above the second floor of the hospital and/or rnedical office buildings shall consist of glazed windows and/or tinting (non-reflective glass/windows) to reduce the arnount of glare ernitted frorn the upper floors. A-3. The applicant/developer shall plant, irrigate as necessary, and replace as necessary rnature trees (24-inch or greater) and shrubs (15- gallon or greater) around the perirneter of the Project site. Enhanced landscaping rnay be required along the northern property line and adjacent to residential parcels. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 19 The Supplemental EIR that was prepared pursuant to the Riverside County Superior Court's ruling includes additional significant impacts that are deemed Unavoidable Significant Impacts identified as: . Noise impacts associated with emergency vehicle sirens . Noise impacts associated with Project construction . Direct Project-related traffic impacts . Cumulative traffic impacts In addition to the mitigation measures proposed for the original Project EIR, the following mitigation measures are recommended in the Supplemental EIR to reduce the impacts to the extent practicable. Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Supplemental EIR is included as Attachment 3, Exhibit A. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDA TION Staff has reviewed the proposed Project and has identified various issues of concern. In addition, an Environmental Impact Report and a Supplemental EIR have been prepared, which identifies potentially significant environmental impacts. Staff has included Conditions of Approval and has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring Program that addresses these concerns and reduces the potentially significant environmental impacts to a less than significant level, or to the extent practicable. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval. Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council certify the EIR and Mitigation Monitoring Program and approve Planning Application Numbers PA07-0198, PA07-0199, PA07-0200, PA07-0201 and PA07-0202 based upon the findings and the attached Conditions of Approval. The proposed Project provides a multitude of benefits and services that are needed within the community. A study commissioned in 2007 by the Regional Medical Task Force, which is made up of representatives of the Cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Lake Elsinore, Hemet, Perris, Canyon Lake and Riverside County, indicates that Southwest Riverside County has a severe shortage of existing hospital beds throughout the region. There are currently 1.05 hospital beds per 1,000 people, whereas the State of California, as a whole, has about 2.2 beds per 1,000 people. Riverside County's public health officer and director of its community health agency has said the southwest part of the county would need to double the amount of beds to get to the state average, but that wouldn't be enough to stay ahead of the expected population growth during the next two decades. In addition to the shortage of hospital beds, the study concluded that the Southwest Riverside County region has fewer than half of the statewide average number of physicians per person, and the State of California ranks 49'h in the nation for the number of registered nurses per person. In addition to the provision of services, the Project is considered an economic benefit because the City will now have a regional health care facility that will attract additional medical services, medical offices and related uses and facilities. In addition, quality health care is a desired element that is sought after by companies looking to establish and/or relocate to the City of Temecula. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 20 FINDINGS 1. Statement of Overriding Consideration The Planning Commission finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable short-term, long-term and cumulative air quality impacts, noise impacts associated with the maximum potential number of emergency helicopter flights identified in the Final EIR, siren noise, construction noise, and direct traffic impacts and cumulative traffic impacts identified in the SEIR and in the record. In making this finding, the Planning Commission has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The Planning Commission finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project: a. All feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because while they generally have similar or less environmental impacts, they do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings. b. The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will support the diversification of Temecula's economic and employment base, including but not limited to biomedical, research, and office facilities. c. The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will provide superior, easily accessible necessary medical services to the local community, including but not limited to emergency, acute, outpatient, and cancer medical care and physical rehabilitation services. Southwest Riverside County in general, and the City of Temecula specifically, is in need of new and expanded hospital facilities to enhance the ability to provide medical services to the area which continues to experience substantial population growth and related increased demand for medical services. d. The proposed Temecula Regional Hospital will provide the region with new employment opportunities for highly trained medical and medical services workers. e. The Temecula Regional Hospital will be centrally located, with access from a major roadway, to best serve the medical service needs of local residents and the region. 2. General Plan Amendment a. The amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan encourage "A diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses (Goal 1);" "A City of diversified development character, where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development (Goal 3);" and "A City C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 21 compatible and coordinated with regional land use and transportation patterns (Goal 8)." The Project provides a regional use that is needed in the community and surrounding region. There is currently a lack of medical treatment facilities in the community capable of providing adequate medical care for the general population. The Project integrates public medical facilities necessary for the demand of the current and future population. The Project is situated adjacent to residential uses and a state highway. The Project has been designed to mitigate various potentially significant impacts via an environmental assessment in which circulation, noise, light and glare, biological and air quality has been reviewed and conditions of approval have been imposed so the Project can co- exist with the surrounding rural residential area. The Project is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Professional Office (PO) designation, which allows low and mid rise structures that provide uses such as community facilities. In addition, the Project is consistent with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of proposed use. The Project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). b. The amendment will not have a significant impact on the character of the surrounding area. The amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures. The Project allowed by the amendment is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and as designed and conditioned the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures because there was an initial study prepared, which identified potentially significant environmental impacts and a mitigation monitoring program was adopted that mitigates potentially significant impacts such as traffic, air quality, noise, light and glare, and biological to a less than significant level. For example, access points have been designed to reduce the amount of traffic leaving the Project site towards residential areas by eliminating left turn options and focusing the primary access points along the state highway. Additional landscaping and berming are included in the conditions of approval to screen the height and reduce noise. The tallest buildings were relocated closer to the state highway, away from the residential area to reduce the appearance of height; this will also reduce the noise from the emergency room area. There are conditions in place requiring helicopters arriving and leaving the Project site to utilize commercial and state highway corridors rather than residential areas. Emergency vehicles are required to turn off sirens upon entry to the project site, and sirens may only be used in emergency situations. The Project is a conditionally permitted use and has been designed and conditioned (including mitigation measures) in a manner that will reduce any potentially significant impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The building and the site are designed to respect the surrounding area and uses and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 22 c. The nature of the Project allowed by the amendment is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The Project is a 320-bed hospital, medical office buildings, cancer research and treatment center, physical therapy and rehabilitation center, and a helipad. The nature of these uses, as conditioned, is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the Project is providing a service that is needed in the community and region and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the surrounding community. The Project will actually contribute to the long term viability and longevity of the community by providing additional medical care facilities. In addition, prior to the issuance of any building permit, the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) as well as the City of Temecula Building Department and Fire Department will review the construction plans for compliance with the Uniform Building Code and Uniform Fire Code. d. The heliport is consistent with the requirements described in subsection 2 and 3 of Section 17.10.020.P of the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed helipad facility is consistent with the requirements described in Section 17.10.020.P of the City of Temecula Development Code, including setbacks from parks, school and residentially zoned parcels. 3. Zone Change a. The proposed zone is consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan of the City of Temecula in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map. The proposed zone change is consistent with the related General Plan Amendment, the site is physically suitable for the type of uses that will occur in this area, and the proposed zone change would further the City's long- term economic development goals. b. The proposed change of zone conforms to the General Plan and the use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan. The proposed change of zone allows for a use that will provide the diversity of uses desired in the General Plan and will create a balanced community with additional public services available to the community. 4. Conditional Use Permit-Hospital Facility (Code Section 17.040.010E) a. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; the proposal, a request for a 320-bed hospital facility and a helipad, is consistent with the goals and policies contained in the General Plan and land use standards in the Development Code. The goals and policies in the Land Use Element of the General Plan encourage "a diverse and integrated mix of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational, public and open space land uses (Goal 1);" "a City of diversified development character where rural and historical areas are protected and co-exist with newer urban development (Goal 3);" and "a City compatible and coordinated with regional land use and transportation patterns (Goal 8)." The proposed Project provides a regional use that is needed in the community and surrounding region. There is currently a lack of medical treatment facilities in the community capable of providing adequate medical care for the general population. The proposed Project integrates public medical facilities necessary for the demand of the current and future population. The Project is situated adjacent to residential uses and a C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 23 State highway. The Project has been designed to mitigate various potentially significant impacts via an EIR, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and Conditions of Approval in which circulation, noise, light and glare, biological impacts and air quality has been reviewed and conditioned so the Project can co-exist with the surrounding rural residential area. The Project, a hospital facility, is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Professional Office (PO) designation, which allows low and mid-rise structures that provide uses such as community facilities. In addition, the Project is consistent with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO- 9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the proposed use. The Project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). b. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and as designed and conditioned the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. An Initial Study and an EIR were prepared, which identified potentially significant environmental impacts and a mitigation monitoring program was adopted that mitigates potentially significant impacts such as traffic, air quality, noise, light and glare, and biology to a less than significant level. For example, access points have been designed to reduce the amount of traffic leaving the Project site towards residential areas by eliminating left turn options and focusing the primary access points along the State highway. Additional landscaping and berming are included in the Conditions of Approval to screen the height and reduce noise. The tallest buildings were relocated closer to the State highway, away from the residential area to reduce the appearance of the height; this will also reduce the noise from the emergency room area. Sound blankets are required during initial grading and construction activities to mitigate construction noise. There are conditions in place requiring helicopters arriving and leaving the Project site to utilize commercial and the State highway corridor rather than residential areas. Emergency vehicles are required to turn off sirens no less than Yo mile from the Project site. The Project is a conditionally permitted use and has been designed and conditioned (including mitigation measures) in manner that will reduce any potentially significant impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. The building and the site are designed to respect the surrounding area and uses and therefore will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. c. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the Planning Commission, or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The conditional use is a request for a 320-bed hospital and helipad on a 35.31-acre site. The Project has been reviewed and it is determined that the Project is in compliance with the development standards of the Development Code and associated Planned Development Overlay (PDO-9), including setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, lot coverage and height. The Project also provides amenities such as a multi-use trail between the Project site and the adjacent residences to the north, which will extend a future trail to be constructed in the C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 24 near future. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed hospital facilities without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code. d. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is for a 320-bed hospital. The nature of this use, as conditioned is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community because the proposed Project is providing a service that is needed in the community and region and it has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts, including health, safety and general welfare to the surrounding community. The proposed Project will actually contribute to the long-term viability and longevity of the community by providing additional medical care facilities. In addition, prior to the issuance of any building permits, the California Office of Statewide Health and Planning Development (OSHPOD) and/or the City of Temecula Building Department and Fire Department will review the construction plans for compliance with applicable building and fire codes. 5. Conditional Use Permit-Helipad (Code Section 17.040.010E) a. The helipad is consistent with the requirements described in subsection 2 and 3 of Section 17.10.020.P City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed helipad facility is consistent with the requirements described in Section 17.10.020.P of the City of Temecula Development Code, including setbacks from parks, school and residentially zoned parcels. b. The helipad shall not be used until the Applicant applies for and obtains a Special Use Helipad Permit for an Emergency Medical Services Landing Site, as provided for in the California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Section 3527, Airport and Heliport Definitions. This permit allows, over any 12-month period, for no more than an average of 6 landings per month with a patient or patients on the helicopter, except to allow for adequate medical response to a mass casualty event. c. Noise exposure from helicopter flights will be minimized to the extent practicable because helicopter pilots responding to calls for patient transport shall be informed of the preferred approach and departure heading of 1350 southeast, which avoids flying over residential areas. 6. Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF) a. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals and policies in the General Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development Code and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the Project has been reviewed and as designed and conditioned, it has been determined that the Project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, State law and the General Plan. b. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public, health, safety and general welfare. The overall development of the land has been designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 25 welfare, because the Project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the surrounding neighborhood and the Project has been reviewed and conditioned to comply with the uniform building and fire codes. 6. Tentative Parcel/Tract Map (Code Section 16.09.1400) a. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision is consistent with the Development Code, Subdivision Ordinance, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. b. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract. c. The site is physically suitable for the uses and proposed density as shown on the Tentative Map as proposed by the Applicant. d. The design of the proposed subdivision and the proposed improvements, with appropriate Conditions of Approval, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known fish, wildlife or habitat on the Project site, and the Project will not affect any fish, wildlife or habitat off-site. In addition, an EIR and a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared and is recommended for certification by the City Council prior to action on the Application. e. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. f. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. h. The subdivision is a commercial Project and is not subject to Quimby fees. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 28 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 29 3. PC Resolution 08-_ (Draft SEIR) - Blue Page 30 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ 4. PC Resolution 08-_ (General Plan Amendment) - Blue Page 31 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 26 5. PC Resolution 08-_ (Zone Change) - Blue Page 32 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ 6. PC Resolution 08-_ (Conditional Use Permit) - Blue Page 33 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ 7. PC Resolution 08-_ (Development Plan) - Blue Page 34 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ 8. PC Resolution 08-_ (Tentative Parcel Map) - Blue Page 35 Exhibit A - City Council Resolution 08-_ 9. Response to Comment Letters Received on SEIR - Blue Page 36 10. Comment Letters Received - Blue Page 37 11. Draft SEIR - Blue Page 38 12. Authorization of Shortened Public Review of SEIR - Blue Page 39 13. Notice of Completion/Notice of Availability of SEIR - Blue Page 40 14. Notice of Preparation of SEIR - Blue Page 41 15. January 24, 2006 City Council Minutes - Blue Page 42 16. January 24, 2006 City Council Staff Report - Blue Page 43 17. January 5, 2006 Planning Commission Minutes - Blue Page 44 18. December 7,2005 Planning Commission Minutes - Blue Page 45 19. November 16, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes - Blue Page 46 20. November 16, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 47 21. April 20, 2005 Planning Commission Minutes - Blue Page 48 22 April 6, 2005 Planning Commission Staff Report - Blue Page 49 23. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 50 C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\869082.doc 27 Additional Attachments to Item No. 14 are available on the City's Internet!! ! Please follow the directions noted below Accessing Hospital Attachments . Go to City of Temecula website - cityoftemecula.org . On homepage under EGovernment - click on Search Documents and Records . Click on Community Development . Click on Hospital - 1/22/08 . Click on document(s) you would like to view ITEM NO. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA07-0316, a Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07- 0316, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PA97-0118 (PROMENADE MALL) TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RING ROAD INCLUDING SITE MODIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ADDITIONAL ALL-WAY STOPS, ACCESS RECONFIGURATION, MODIFIED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE, AND AISLE CLOSURES WITH ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS BACKGROUND: On July 24,2007 the City Council approved the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. The Agreement outlined that both the City and Temecula Town Center Associates desire the Ring Road surrounding the Promenade Mall be enhanced so as to improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. The Agreement requires that the plans for the enhancement of the Ring Road include: (1) reconfiguration of certain traffic lanes; (2) upgrades to traffic signage and street markings; (3) closure and control of selected parking aisles along the Ring Road; (4) coordination of Ring Road traffic signals with public signals; (5) enhancements to the pedestrian crossings along portions of the Ring Road; and (6) upgrades to access points for certain surrounding properties. On November 9, 2007, Forest City Development Corporation submitted a Major Modification application to PA97 -0118 (Promenade Mall) to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road. Staff reviewed the application for conformance with the Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans (PA06-0293), Specific Plan No. 263, the General Plan and Development Code. ANAL YSIS: The Ring Road circulation system consists of a four-lane, private looped road; radial private approach roads from public arterials; drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings; and, access driveways to surrounding properties. Modification and enhancement improvements to the Ring Road circulation system intend to eliminate confusion at intersections by improving traffic control and operations; reducing delay to the Ring Road approaches; calming traffic at key pedestrian and vehicular access locations; eliminating sight distance constraints; and, improving signage and directional striping. Implementation of the improvements occurs in two phases. The Phase 1 improvements represent a plan to be considered and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council on or before April 15, 2008. Phase 2 improvements will be based on two traffic studies and other potential improvements as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. Phase 1 improvements (see attached exhibits) . Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road West and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Winchester East. . Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road North and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Ynez Road South. . Install six all-way stops at designated approach roads and access driveways. . Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. . Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. . Improve access driveways to Bel Villaggio including pedestrian crosswalks and a speed table at the intersection with proposed Main Street. . Remove and close off 16 drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. . Add new turn lanes on the Ring Road circulation system: Right turn to Winchester Road East; left turn from Winchester Road West; left turn from Ynez Road North; and, left turn from North General Kearny. . Install signing and striping improvements for the entire Ring Road circulation system. Phase 2 improvements (see attached exhibits) At the Director of Public Works' discretion certain additional improvements to the Ring Road circulation system may be necessary. The applicant agrees to conduct up to two traffic studies of the Ring Road circulation system. The applicant intends to conduct the first study in calendar year 2008 after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements. The applicant expects to conduct a second study in calendar year 2009 after the completion of the Main Street and mall building improvements. At any time after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements and within the times established in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, the Director of Public Works may direct completion of the following improvements: . Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. . Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. . Remove and close off up to three drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. . Additional improvements warranted by the traffic studies and identified necessary by the Director of Public Works requires future agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates. The project results in the loss of landscaping at drive aisles and medians, however the Promenade Mall site remains consistent with the landscaping requirements in the Specific Plan. The project also results in the net gain of one parking space for the site. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, approved by the Council as EIR No. 340 on October 11,1994, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, the City Council's approval of the Addendum to the FEIR on September 26, 2006, and the subsequent environmental reviews of development plans for the Mall following approval of the Development Agreement. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancements does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification does not involve significant new effects, nor change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance, which shows that the Major Modification will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the FEIR and Addendum. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan does not include any expansion of existing uses or retail square footage and therefore would not result in any additional trip generation. The Ring Road Plan will result in modified traffic patterns within the Mall property to improve pedestrian and vehicle circulation. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15164) is the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification, and no additional environmental documentation is required. In addition, based on the findings set forth above, the proposed project is exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") by virtue of the categorical and statutory exemptions set forth in the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.) Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities, because the project consists of the minor alteration of existing streets for the purpose of public safety. The Ring Road enhancements will not result in the expansion of any use. FISCAL IMPACT: Completion of the Ring Road circulation system improvements are secured with the Holdback provisions identified in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. More specifically, the first $2 million secures the improvements for Phase 1 and the final $2 million secures the improvements for Phase 2 improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Ring Road Enhancement Plan CC Resolution 08-_ January 16, 2008 Planning Commission Packet RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0316, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PA97-0118 (PROMENADE MALL) TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RING ROAD INCLUDING SITE MODIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ADDITIONAL ALL- WAY STOPS, ACCESS RECONFIGURATION, MODIFIED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE, AND AISLE CLOSURES WITH ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) and Environmental Impact Report No. 340. B. The City, Forest City Development California, Inc., a California Corporation, and LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, entered into a Development Agreement dated December 17, 1996 for the development of the Temecula Regional Center. The Development Agreement was recorded on December 30, 1996 as Document No. 488428 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. C. On September 12, 2006 the City Council introduced, and on September 26, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 06-10 which approved the First Amendment to the Development Agreement extending the term of the Development Agreement to January 16, 2010. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement was recorded on October 11, 2006 as Document No. 06-0748777 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq. Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., a California Limited Partnership ("Developer") is the successor in interest to the Owners rights in the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement approved on December 17, 1996, as amended by the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, approved on September 26, 2006, shall be collectively referred to in this Resolution as the "Development Agreement." D. In adopting Ordinance No. 06-10, the City Council found that a supplemental or subsequent EIR need not be prepared, and that the City may rely on the Addendum to approve the proposed extension to the Development Agreement and the construction of the Final Phase of the Specific Plan ("Addendum"). A Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk of Riverside County as required by law on September 13, 2006. E. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. F. On July 24, 2007 the City Council approved the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. The Agreement outlined that both the City and Temecula Town Center Associates desire the Ring Road surrounding the Promenade Mall be enhanced so as to improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. G. On November 9, 2007, Forest City Development filed Planning Application No. PA07-0316, a Major Modification to PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) to provide vehicular and pedestrian improvements to the Ring Road in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. I. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 16, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff, Developer and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. J. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Major Modification, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-08 recommending the City Council approve the proposed Major Modification. K. On January 22, 2008 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Major Modification as prescribed by law at which time all persons interested in the proposed Major Modification had the opportunity and did address the City Council on this matter. L. Following due consideration of the testimony received at the public hearing and the administrative record, the City Council adopted this Resolution. Section 2. Environmental Compliance Findinqs. The City Council further finds, determines and declares that: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City Council has considered the proposed Major Modification. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, approved by the Council as EIR No. 340 on October 11, 1994, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, the City Council's approval of the Addendum to the FEIR on September 26, 2006, and the subsequent environmental reviews of development plans for the Mall following approval of the Development Agreement. Based on that review, the City Council finds that the proposed Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancements does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. B. Specifically, the City Council finds that the proposed Major Modification does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the FEIR and Addendum. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan does not include any expansion of existing uses or retail square footage and therefore would not result in any additional trip generation. The Ring Road Plan will result in modified traffic patterns within the Mall property to improve pedestrian and vehicle circulation. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15164) is the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification, and no additional environmental documentation is required. C. Although not required as part of the CEQA review, the City Council reviewed a Supplemental Traffic Analysis for the Promenade Mall Expansion as part of the approval for Planning Application No. PA06-0293, prepared by RBF Consulting which determined "that cumulative trip generation estimated for the approved Promenade Mall/Power Center I and II, Costco, Bel Villaggio/Overland Corporate Center, and proposed Promenade Mall Expansion project falls within the Specific Plan total included in the original EIR Traffic Study previously approved by the City." The analysis concluded that "the Promenade Mall Expansion project, as currently proposed, is consistent with the original Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan EIR Traffic Study." In addition to the mitigation measures incorporated into the project by the FEIR, the Specific Plan and the City's General Plan, the City entered into a Settlement Agreement with the County of Riverside, dated as of May 2005, in which the County has agreed to require development in the 1-215 area to become part of a fully and funded Community Facilities District for the construction of various roadways designed to reduce the traffic on Winchester Road. D. In addition, based on the findings set forth above, the proposed project is exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") by virtue of the categorical and statutory exemptions set forth in the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.) Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities, because the project consists of the minor alteration of existing streets for the purpose of public safety. The Ring Road enhancements will not result in the expansion of any use. E. The custodian of records for the Initial Study and FEIR for the Development Agreement and Specific Plan No. 263, the Addendum prepared in connection with the First Amendment to the Development Agreement extending the term of the Development Agreement, and all other materials, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Department of the City of Temecula. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department located at the Planning Department of the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Section 3. Further Findinqs. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula, Specific Plan No. 263, the Development Agreement, and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the land use and circulation goals and policies in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The project involves the modification of the existing Ring Road, access and parking areas. No development is proposed with this project. The modifications will result in pedestrian and vehicular enhancements which will improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. Additionally, the major modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The site plan modifications to access, parking/landscape layout, striping and signage will enhance the Ring Road. Additionally, the major modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. Section 4. Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA07 -0316, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 22nd day of January, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 22nd day of January, 2008, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0316 Project Description: A Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road at the Promenade Mall. Site modifications include additional traffic signals, additional all-way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910420-005thru-009 MSHCP Category: Not Applicable per Development Agreement DIF Category: Not Applicable per Development Agreement TUMF Category: Retail Commercial Development Mitigation Fee: $2.00/SF per Development Agreement Approval Date: January 22, 2008 Expiration Date: January 22, 2010 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 1 3. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 2 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 3 Planning Department 4. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification except as modified herein: a. Enhanced paving shall be provided for pedestrian crosswalks at the Ring Road where Main Street will connect to Bel Villaggio. b. ADA ramps shall be provided at all pedestrian crosswalks. Public Works Department 5. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. 6. The Ring Road circulation system consists of a four lane, private looped road; radial private approach roads from public arterials; drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings; and, access driveways to surrounding properties. Modification and enhancement improvements to the Ring Road circulation system intend to eliminate confusion at intersections by improving traffic control and operations; reducing delay to the Ring Road approaches; calming traffic at key pedestrian and vehicular access locations; eliminating sight distance constraints; and, improving signage and directional striping. Implementation of the improvements occurs in two phases. The Phase 1 improvements represent a plan to be considered and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council on or before April 15, 2008. Phase 2 improvements will be based on two traffic studies and other potential improvements as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. a. Phase 1 improvements (see attached exhibits) I. Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road West and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Winchester East. il. Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road North and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Ynez Road South. ill. Install six all-way stops at designated approach roads and access driveways. iv. Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. v. Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. vI. Improve access driveways to Bel Villaggio including pedestrian crosswalks and a speed table at the intersection with proposed Main Street. viI. Remove and close off 16 drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 4 viiI. Add new turn lanes on the Ring Road circulation system: right turn to Winchester Road East; left turn from Winchester Road West; left turn from Ynez Road North; and, left turn from North General Kearny. ix. Install signing and striping improvements for the entire Ring Road circulation system. b. Phase 2 improvements (see attached exhibits) At the Director of Public Works' discretion certain additional improvements to the Ring Road circulation system may be necessary. The applicant agrees to conduct up to two (2) traffic studies of the Ring Road circulation system. The applicant intends to conduct the first study in calendar year 2008 after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements. The applicant expects to conduct a second study in calendar year 2009 after the completion of the Main Street and mall building improvements. At any time after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements and within the times established in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, the Director of Public Works may direct completion of the following improvements: I. Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. il. Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. iil. Remove and close off up to three drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. iv. Additional improvements warranted by the traffic studies and identified necessary by the Director of Public Works requires future agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates. v. The project results in the loss of landscaping at drive aisles and medians, however the Promenade Mall site remains consistent with the landscaping requirements in the Specific Plan. The project also results in the net gain of one parking space for the site. Building and Safety Department 7. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification, except as modified herein. 8. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. Please note, plans submitted after December 31, 2007 will be required to meet the provisions of the California 2007 model codes. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 5 9. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 forthe regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 10. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 11. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 12. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays 13. Submit at time of plan review, electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 14. Submit at time of plan review, precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities as applicable to scope of work for plan review. 15. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Fire Prevention Bureau 16. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 17. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Police Department 18. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 6 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 7 Planning Department 19. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 20. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Fire Prevention Bureau 21. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 22. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 8 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 9 Planning Department 23. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 24. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Building and Safety Department 25. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. 26. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Fire Prevention Bureau 27. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 28. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 10 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 11 Planning Department 29. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 30. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07 -0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Fire Prevention Bureau 31. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 32. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\868950.doc 12 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Dan York, Deputy Director of Public Works Matthew D. Peters, Associate Planner Chervl Kitzerow. Associate Planner January 16, 2008 Planning Application PA07-0316, a Major Modification to PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road. Site modifications include additional traffic signals, additional all- way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage, pedestrian enhancements, and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications. General Plan Designation: Site: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Land Use: Parking: Landscaping: Site: North: South: East: West: Existing Proposed Required Site: Specific Plan NO.7 (SP 263), Temecula Regional Center Retail Commercial Core (PA 2) Commercial - Promenade Mall Existing Commercial Uses Existing Commercial and Office Uses Existing Commercial and Residential Uses Existing Commercial Uses 5,432 spaces 5,509 spaces (net one additional space with enhancement plan - note this total includes PA07-0286) 5,292 spaces Existing Proposed Minimum Required 18%(3% hardscape/15% softscape) 20%(5% hardscape/15% softscape) 15% G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO ~ Mall Ring Rd PJan.doc 1 BACKGROUND On July 24, 2007, the City Council approved the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. The agreement outlined that both the City and Temecula Town Center Associates desire the Ring Road surrounding the Promenade Mall be enhanced so as to improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. The Agreement requires that the plans for the enhancement of the Ring Road include: (1) reconfiguration of certain traffic ianes; (2) upgrades to traffic signage and street markings; (3) closure and control of selected parking aisles along the Ring Road; (4) coordination of Ring Road traffic signals with public signals; (5) enhancements to the pedestrian crossings along portions of the Ring Road; and (6) upgrades to access points for certain surrounding properties. On November 9, 2007, Forest City Development Corporation submitted a Major Modification application for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan. Staff reviewed the application for conformance with the Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans (PA06-0293), Specific Plan No. 263, the General Plan and Development Code. Staff comments regarding parking lot reconfiguration and landscaping were provided to the applicant on November 20,2007. The applicant resubmitted revised plans on November 30,2007. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The Ring Road circulation system consists of a four-lane, private looped road; radial private approach roads from public arterials; drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings; and, access driveways to surrounding properties. Modification and enhancement improvements to the Ring Road circulation system intend to eliminate confusion at intersections by improving traffic control and operations; reduce delay to the Ring Road approaches; calm traffic at key pedestrian and vehicular access locations; eliminate sight distance constraints; and, improve sign age and directional striping. Implementation of the improvements occurs in two phases. The Phase 1 improvements represent a plan to be considered and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council on or before April 15, 2008. Phase 1 improvements . Install a traffic signal at Winchester West and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Winchester East. . Install a traffic signal at Ynez North and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. Install conduit and pre- wire for a potential traffic signal at Ynez South. . Install six all-way stops at designated approach roads and access driveways. . Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Ynez South and the Ring Road. . Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Winchester East and the Ring Road. . Improve access driveways to Bel Vellaggio including pedestrian cross walks and a speed table at the intersection with proposed Main Street. . Remove and close off 16 drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan. doc 2 . Add new tum lanes on the Ring Road circulation system: right turn to Winchester East; left tum from Winchester West; left tum from Ynez North; and, left tum from North General Keamy. . Install signing and striping improvements for the entire Ring Road circuiation system. Phase 2 improvements At the Director of Public Works' discretion, certain additional improvements to the Ring Road circulation system may be necessary. The applicant agrees to conduct up to two traffic studies of the Ring Road circulation system. The applicant intends to conduct the first study in calendar year 2008 after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements. The applicant expects to conduct a second study in caiendar year 2009 after the completion of the Main Street and mall building improvements. At any time after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements and within the times established in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, the Director of Public Works may direct completion of the following improvements: . Install a traffic signal at Winchester East and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. . Install a traffic signal at Ynez South and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. . Remove and close off up to three drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. . Additional improvements warranted by the Traffic Studies and identified necessary by the Director of Public Works requires future agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates. Completion of the Ring Road circulation system improvements are secured with the Holdback provisions identified in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. More specifically, the first $2 million secures the improvements for Phase 1 and the final $2 million secures the improvements for Phase 2 improvements. The Planning Department has included Conditions of Approval (No. 4a and 4b) requiring ADA ramps at all pedestrian crosswalks and enhanced paving at the Main Street connection to Bel Villaggio to further enhance the project area. FINDINGS Maior Modification to Development Plan (Section 17.05.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for T emecula, Specific Plan No. 263, the Development Agreement, and with all applicabie requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan. doc 3 As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the land use and circulation goals and policies in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The project involves the modification of the existing Ring Road, access and parking areas. No development is proposed with this project. The modifications will result in pedestrian and vehicular enhancements which will improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. Additionally, the Major Modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The site plan modifications to access, parking/landscape layout, striping and signage will enhance the Ring Road. Additionally, the major modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, approved by the Council as EIR No. 340 on October 11, 1994, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, the City Council's approval of the Addendum to the FEIR on September 26, 2006, and the subsequent environmental reviews of development plans for the Mall following approval of the Development Agreement. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancements does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification does not involve significant new effects, do not change the baseline environmental conditions, and do not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the FEIR and Addendum. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan does not include any expansion of existing uses or retail square footage and therefore would not result in any additional trip generation. The Ring Road Plan will result in modified traffic patterns within the Mall property to improve pedestrian and vehicle circulation. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15164) is the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification, and no additional environmental documentation is required. G:\Pfanning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO ~ Mall Ring Rd Plan. doc 4 In addition, based on the findings set forth above, the proposed project is exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") by virtue of the categorical and statutory exemptions set forth in the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.) Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities because the project consists of the minor alteration of existing streets for the purpose of public safety. The Ring Road enhancements will not result in the expansion of any use. RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposed request and recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approvai of the Ring Road Enhancement Plan Major Modification. ATTACHMENTS 1. Vicinity Map - Blue Page 6 2. Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement- Blue Page 7 3. Plan Reductions, Ring Road Enhancement Plan - Blue Page 8 4. Detailed Project Description - Blue Page 9 5. Pianning Commission Resolution No. 08-_. - Blue Page 10 Draft Conditions of Approval 6. Initial Study - Blue Page 11 7. EIR Addendum - Blue Page 12 8. Conformed Copy of Notice of Determination for EIR Addendum - Blue Page 13 9. Notice of Public Hearing - Blue Page 14 G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO. Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 VICINITY MAP G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENT G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\PJanning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan. doc 7 , PROMENADE MALL RING ROAD ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENT This Promenade Mall Ring Road Eiihancement Agreement ("Agreement") is dated as of July 24, 2007, and is entered into by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a general law city in the State of California and Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Developer"). In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: . I. Recitals. Each of the parties agrees that this Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each agree are true and correct: A. Developer is the owner ofa portion of the Temecula Promenade Mall (the "Promenade Mall") that is located on approximately 78 acres in the City and is depicted on E:>0ibit A. Depiction of the Properties ("Mall Property"). B. On February 21, 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 07-10 approving P A06-293 and.PA06-197 consisting of approval of a 126,000 square foot expansion of the Promenade Mall in the area between Macy's and the theaters as well as two parking structures, all of which are shown on Exhibit A attached hereto ("Mall Exnansion"). C. "East Parkin!! Facility" means the public parking structure that will be constructed by Developer to accommodate a minimum of 936 public parking spaces as described in more detail in Planning Application No. 06-293 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit) approved by Resolution No. 07-10 of the Planning Commission of the City on February 21,2007. The East Parking Facility will be generally located adjacent to the Promenade Mall between Macy's and Edwards Cinemas and across the Ring Road from the Bel Villaggio Property. D. Agency, Developer and F.C. Temecula, Inc. are parties to that certain Owner Participation Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007 (the "OPA"). Capitalized tenDS not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the OP A. E. The Redevelopment Agency of the City (the "A!!encv"), will purchase the East Parking Facility and the Developer or its affiliate will construct the East Parking Facility all in accordance with the terms of the OP A and an Acquisition Agreement to be entered into between the Agency and the Developer. F. There is a private road that surrounds the Mall Property and provides access to the Promenade Mall buildings and various parcels around the Mall Property ("Rin!! Road"). The Ring Road is shown on Exhibit B attached hereto, Depiction of Ring Road. . G. The parties desire the Ring Road to be enhanced so as to improve access to the buildings on the Mall Property, improve access to various properties around the Mall Property and to make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. It is, therefore, in the best July 12, 2007 1 interests of the City and Developer to provide for the Ring Road enhancement work as provided in this Agreement. 2. RiB!! Road Planninl! A. Developer shall prepare plans for enhancement of the Ring Road which will include the following: (I) reconfiguration of certain traffic lanes; (2) upgrades to traffic signage and street markings; (3) closure and control of selected parking isles along the Ring Road; (4) coordination of Ring Road traffic signals ("RiDI! Road Traffic Shmals") with public street signals; (5) enhancements to the pedestrian crossings along portions of the Ring Road; and (6) upgrades to access points for certain surrounding properties (as amended or modified from time to time in accordance with this Agreement, the "Rioe: Road Enhancement Plan" and the work described therein being referred the herein as the ''Rio!! Road Improvements"). B. The City and Developer acknowledge and agree that completion of the Ring Road Improvements are of major importance to the City and that the Ring Road Improvements will significantly benefit the Ring Road Parties. City and Developer, however, further acknowledge and agree that proceeding with the Ring Road Improvements will take time and will involve complex negotiations with many parties in order to obtain agreement on the Ring Road Enhancement Plan satisfactory to the City, Developer and the Ring Road Parties. The City and Developer shall work diligently and in good faith in the preparation and negotiation of the Ring Road Enhancement Plan. In the event the Ring Road Parties do not approve the Ring Road Enhancement Plan as presented to them, the City agrees, on a best efforts basis, to work with Developer and Ring Road Parties in order to make such necessary modifications to the Ring Road Enhancement Plan (including but not limited to the alteration of proposed work because a party has made unreasonable demands or been uncooperative to the point of delaying the submission of proposed plans) to reasonably address the concerns of the Developer and Ring Road Parties so that an acceptable Ring Road Enhancement Plan can be approved by the City, Developer and Ring Road Parties. C. Developer shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to obtain the approvals of the following companies: May Department Stores Company (now known as Macy's West, Inc.), Sears, Roebuck and Co., J.C. Penney Properties, Inc., and Edwards Theatres Circuit, Inc. (collectively, the "Shoppine: Mall Parties" and individually a "ShODPioe: Mall Partv"). Developer shall also use its commercially reasonable efforts obtain the approval of the owners of the properties that are adjacent to the Ring Road and opposite the Shopping Mall where such consent is contractually required for a given Ring Road Enhancement Plan which the Developer intends to submit to the City COlmcil for approval (collectively, the "Out Parcel Parties" and individually an "Oot Parcel Partv"). The Shopping Mall Parties and the OUl Parcel Parties shall be collectively referred to as the "Riol! Road Parties." During the course of developing the Ring Road Enhancement Plan, the Developer and the City shall meet and confer with the Ring Road Parties concerning the contemplated modifications to the Ring Road with the objective that an appropriate Ring Road Enhancement Plan with input from the consultations with the Ring Road Parties can be presented to the City COlUlciI as soon as possible following the date of this Agreement for approval and the necessary construction of the Ring Road Improvements can thereafter proceed quickly. July 12, 2007 2 D. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan shall be approved by the Ring Road Parties on or before March 15,2008 and shall be presented to the Planning Commission of the City and the City Council for consideration and approval, conditional approval or rejection on or before April 15, 2008. If the Council rejects the Ring Road Enhancement Plan, Developer shall continue to diligently work with the Director of Public Works and the Ring Road Parties and shall use its commercially reasonable efforts to continue to revise and present revised enhancement plans to the Ring Road Parties and the City Council until an acceptable plan is approved by the City Council. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan approved by the City Council shall be the "Aonroved Rinl! Road Enhancement Plan". The City Manager may extend the date for such approvals without further action of the City Council. . E. Developer shall prepare the Ring Road Enhancement Plan and obtain the approvals of the Ring Road Parties at its sole cost and expense. Developer shall construct the Ring Road Improvements at no cost to the City, provided however, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, Developer shall not be required to spend more than an aggregate of $2 Million on the costs of actual construction of the Ring Road Improvements ("Develooer's Cost"). The costs of design, construction management, insurance, judgments, attorney's fees, or similar costs not directly related to construction of the Ring Road Improvements shall not be included as part of the calculation of what constitutes Developer's Costs. As Developer incurs actual construction costs for the Ring Road Improvements, Developer's Cost shall be reduced by such amounts. F. The parties acknowledge that work regarding the traffic signals to installed or modified under the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan should not be perfonned during the holiday months from October through December. Subject to force majeure delays, the scheduled completion .date for such work is one (I) month after the completion of all other work contemplated under the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan, but if such date falls within October through December then the completion date shall be extended to January 31 thereafter. The City and Developer shall enter into a maintenance agreement, effective as of the date the traffic signal work is completed, under which the City shall assume responsibility for the maintenance of such traffic signals at the City's sole cost and expense. 3. Rinl!' Road Enhancement Plan Imolementation A. Once the Ring Road Enhancement Plan has been approved by the City Council and the Ring Road Parties (from which Developer is able to obtain consent as provided in Section 2.C.), Developer shall diligently proceed with construction drawings for the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and actual construction of the Ring Road Improvements set forth in the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and shall diligently complete the Ring Road Improvements in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan. B. Developer shall regularly report tu the Director of Public Works on the progress of the construction drawings and the construction of the Ring Road Improvements. Within five (5) business days of each of the following actions, Developer shall notify the Director of Public Works of each action md provide the Director of Public Works with true correct and complete copies of the agreements and documents pertaining to the action: (1) entering into contracts for the construction of one or more components of the Ring Road July 12, 2007 3 Improvements; (2) placing an order for a traffic signal; (3) submission of change orders by a contractor; or (4) resolution of change orders with a contractor. C. Developer shall complete the Ring Road Improvements described in the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement on or before March 26, 2009 subject to force majeure delays as defined in Section 5.1. provided, however, that such events shall not excuse performance past the date of the issuance by the City of the permanent certificate of occupancy for the Mall Expansion that will allow the Mall Expansion to be open for customers even if the tenant improvements for some stores have not been completed (the "Certificate of Occunancv"). 4. Security for Imolementation of AODroved Rine: Road Enhancement Plan. A. Pursuant to Article 4 of the OPA and the Acquisition Agreement referred to therein, the Agency shall purchase from the Developer, or an affiliate oflhe Developer, the East Parking Facility for a purchase price of $11 million, which purchase price shall be paid in two or more installments (the "Purchase Price"). Agency will fund all or a portion of the Purchase Price with the proceeds of tax allocation bonds ("Agency Bonds"). The OP A further provides that the sum of Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) (the "Holdback") will be held in an account created and maintained by the Fiscal Agent for the Agency Bonds (the "Holdback Account") to secure the completion of the Ring Road Improvements by the Developer. I} No portion of the Holdback shall be used to pay for any portion of the costs of the Ring Road Improvements. 2) Upon the approval of the Ring Road Enhancement Plan by the Ring Road Parties and the City Council, the Holdback shall be reduced to the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) 3) The remaining balance in the Holdback shall be released upon: (1) delivery of a certificate of completion from Developer and its engineer or contractor to the Director of Public Works slating that the Ring Road Improvements have been completed in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and all applicable laws; and (2) the Director of Public Work's written certification (not to be wrreasonably withheld) that the Ring Road Improvements have been completed in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and all applicable laws. The Ring Road Improvements shall be considered completed ("Completed") If the work is sufficiently complete in accordance with the plans for such Ring Road Improvements so that they may be utilized for their intended use and may be subject to outstanding nonmaterial punch list items. The Director of Public Works shall issue his decision within ten (10) business days of receipt of each of the Developer's certificates of completion and shall cause a written certificate to be provided to the Agency and/or the Fiscal Agent for the Agency Bonds, as required by any fiscal agent or indenture for the Agency Bonds (the "Indenture"), which indicates that the conditions for release of the Holdback to the Developer from the Holdback Account have been satisfied. July 12, 2007 4 4} If the conditions to the release of the remaining balance in the Holdback have not been satisfied on or before April IS, 2011, the funds shall be released to the Agency for any lawful uses without any further obligations to Developer.. B. Developer shall also obtain for the benefit of the City a corporate completion guarantee from Developer's affiliate, Forest City Enterprises, Inc. ("Guarantor"), to secure the Developer's obligations to complete the Ring Road Improvements under this Agreement ("Comnletion Guarantee''). The Completion Guarantee shall be in substantially the fonn attached hereto as Exhibit C. provided that any changes from Exhibit C shall be approved by the City Attorney. C. In the event Developer has not completed the Ring Road Improvements, other than planned traffic signals, by January 31, 2009, as same may be extended due to force majeure events, City shall have the right to send a notice to the Guarantor to demand completion of said Ring Road Improvements pursuant to the Completion Guaranty. In the event Developer has not completed the traffic signals portion of the Ring Road Improvements by March 26, 2009, as same may be extended due to force majeure events, City shall have the right to send a notice to the Guarantor to demand completion of said Ring Road Improvements pursuant to the Completion Guaranty. D. If the Guarantor fai1s to diligently commence or complete the Ring Road Improvements in accordance with the tenns of the Completion Guaranty, City shall have the right, but not the obligation to complete the Ring Road Improvements as described in the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan which have not been completed by Devcloper or Guarantor in accordance with the tenns and conditions of this Agreement. Developer hereby grants City along with its agents, contractors and independent contractots, a license to enter Ring Road and such surrounding properties as necessary in order to construct the Ring Road Improvements subject to the following tenns: I) City shall provide Developer notice of the proposed construction not less than IS days prior to the estimated start of construction. 2} During the course of construction of the Ring Road Improvements, City shall cooperate with Developer to provide updates concerning construction scheduling and progress and shall respond to complaints and concerns of Developer and its tenants in a commercially reasonable manner. 3) During the course of construction of the Ring Road Improvements, Developer shall cooperate with the City and provide all docwnents and information concerning construction of the Ring Road Improvements completed or in progress prior to the City's take over of construction. 4) In constructing the Ring Road Improvements, City shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by first class retail shopping center operators engaged in construction and management of similar improvements and shall exercise diligence in the performance of its work. July 12,2007 5 5) City agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless Developer, its partners, owners, officers, directors, and employees (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, mechanics liens, or liability of any kind or nature which the Indemnified Parties may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of City's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform the construction work for the Ring Road Improvements as set forth under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence or wrongful conduct of Indemnified Parties. The obligations of City in this section with respect to the time during which it is completing construction of the Ring Road Improvement shall continue after the City's completion of the Ring Road Improvements in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan, but any obligation hereunder shall terminate as to any incidents occurring after the City completes the Ring Road Improvements in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan and Developer takes possession thereof. 6) All of the contractors retained by City, and their subcontractors, shall procure and maintain for the duration of the construction of the Ring Road Improvements general liability insurance in a policy amount of not less than $2 million. The policies shall name the Developer and its officers and employees as additional insureds. 7) City shall not allow any liens to be placed upon the Mall Property or Ring Road or any of the Ring Road Improvements arising from the .construction of the Ring Road Improvements and if any liens are placed on the MaIl Property or Ring Road as a result of the construction of the Ring Road Improvements, City shall use its best efforts to remove said liens as soon as practicable or cause such liens to be bonded over. 8) In the event that any tangible, physical property of Developer or other owner of property within the Promenade Mall, or a tenant of Developer is damaged as a direct result of the construction work of the Ring Road Improvements by City or one ofits contractors, City shall be responsible for the prompt resolution of such claims in accordance with commercially reasonable claims adjustment standards. 9) As part of the approval of the Ring Road Parties for the Ring Road Improvements, Developer shall obtain their approval of the terms of this license to allow the City to construct the Ring Road Improvements on their portions of the Ring Road. 10) Upon completion of the Ring Road Improvements work by City in accordance with the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan, Developer shall resume possession thereof and City shall have no obligation for maintenance or repairs to the Ring Road Improvements except for the following traffic signals described under the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan. 11) The City shall submit to Developer invoices with commercially reasonable documentation of the costs it has incurred in constructing the Ring Road Improvements, including but not limited to its costs of third party construction management, insurance and any amounts necessary to fulfill its indemnification obligations ("City's Cost to ComDlete''). The parties acknowledge and agree tbat the City's Costs to Complete the Ring July 12, 2007 6 Road Improvements in the event it takes over such construction could exceed the maximum amount of the Developer's Cost and the Parties therefore agree that the City's Costs to Complete under this section or the Completion Guaranty shall not be limited by such amount. Unless Developer objects to the payment of such invoice, it shall pay such invoice within ten days of receipt. Developer shall not unreasonably object to the payment of an invoice. S. GeneraL A. Notices. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) person~ service with return receipt or affidavit of delivery, (ii) delivery by a reputable docwnent delivery service, such as, but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certi:fied mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by a written notice provided in accordance with this Section. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses speci:fied below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 9258.9-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To: Developer: Temecula Towne Center Associates, LP CIO Forest City Development 949 South Hope Street #200 Los Angeles, CA 90015 Attention: Brian lones With a copy to: Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 50 Public Square, Ste 1360 Cleveland,OH 44113-2204 Attention: General Counsel B. Entire Al!reement. Modifications. This Agreement and the documents referenced herein contain the complete expression of the whole agreement between the parties with respect to the obligations set forth herein, and there are no promises, representations, agreements, warranties or inducements, either expressed verbally or implied, except as are fully set forth herein. This Agreement cannot be enlarged, modified, or changed in any respect except by written agreement between the parties. No alteration, supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by all of the parties hereto. The July 12, 2007 7 City Manager is authorized to enter into any amendments to this Agreement without any further action by the City Council. C. Avnlicable Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to have been entered into and shall, in all respects, be interpreted, construed, enforced and governed by and under the laws of the State of California. D. Indevendent Lel!al Counsel. Each party acknowledges that it had retained independent legal counsel of its own choice to review this Agreement and that prior to the execution hereof each party has had the opportunity to review the terms of this Agreement with its counsel and is entering into this Agreement after such review. E. Validitv of Al!reeI11ent. All parties agree that this Agreement is legal, valid and binding on each party and enforceable in accordance with its tenns. F. Bindinl! on Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, assigns, executors and administrators. G. Attornevs' Fees. If any legal action or any arbitration or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful Or prevailing party or parties shali be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs and expenses incurred in that action or proceeding in addition to any other relief to which it or they may be entitled. H. Time. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. I. Force Maieure Delavs.' Nonperformance of any of the conditions or covenants herein by any party hereto shall be excused when performance is prevented or delayed by reason of any of the following forces reasonably beyond the control of such party: acts of God, strike, war, lockout, labor trouble, reasonable inability to secure materials or labor, unreasonable delay by a governmental entity in the issuance of any required governmental pennit, license or approval, act of nature (including but not limited to hurricane, earthquake, windstorm, flood, wildfire, or other severe weather or environmental condition) insurrection, riot, casualty, acts of public enemy, governmental restrictions, litigation initiated by a party other . than a party hereto or its affiliate, unreasonable acts or failures to act of any governmental agency or entity, including the Developer and the City, or unreasonable delays of any contractor, subcontractor or supplier. In such event, nonperformance shall be excused and the time of performance shall be extended by the number of day!! the performance is delayed or prevented; provided, however, that nothing contained in this Section shall excuse the performance of any act rendered difficult or impossible solely because of the financial condition oftbe party required to perform the act. J. CounteIparts and Fax Transniission. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and exchanged by facsimile, and all original or facsimile counterparts, when taken together, shall be valid as one instrument as though signed in original on a single page. July 12, 2007 8 K. Exhibits. The following Exhibits are attacbed hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as thongh set forth in full: Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Depiction of Mall Property Depiction of Ring Road Completion Guarantee L. Authority to Execute this Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of a party warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the party and has the authority to bind that party to the performance of its obligations hereunder. (signatures on next page) July 12,2007 ~ 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. A TIEST: VED F : ~ P/;Ier M. Thorson . City Attorney My 12,2007 10 TEMECULA TOWNE CENTER ASSOCIATES, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By F. C. Temeeula, Inc., a California corporation, its General partner B"JJE:~ N_ -.,_ ,- Title: VIe..... ~ e.r.~ July 12, 2007 11 EXHIBIT A DEPICTION OF MALL PROPERTIES (attached) July 12,2007 12 '" ~ e'tl I~ I. ) lr~4 ~ RING ROAD AGREEMENT EXHIBIT A- DEPICTION OF MALL PROPERTY ~ '-1'1'1'1 , .".- I 'I "If If! I~ THE PROMENADE IN TEMECUIA lEUEOJI.A TOftN CENIER ~TES '.9 sount HOPE SlREET. StkIE lOG LOS ANGElES, CAUfORHlA 10016 1t1if1 111m , '^~,' \-- . . ~~ ~ ~ ! 11~ ~ EXHmIT B. DEPICTION OF RING ROAD (attached) July 12, 2001 13 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , / , , I J I B RING ROAD A~p~~~~~NJF RING ROAD EXHIBIT B - ~ Ring Road Ring Road ~::-- YNBZ ~ _r--.. ~ EXHIBIT "C" COMPLETION GUARANTY (attached) July 12, 2007 14 COMPLETION GUARANTEE THIS COMPLETION GUARANTEE (this "Guarantee'') is executed as of the 24th day of July, 2007, by FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio corporation, having an address of Tenninal Tower, Suite 1100,50 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 ("Guarantor''), to and in favor of the CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, a general law city in the State of Cali fomi a, having an address of 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590 ("City''). Capitalized tenns not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Ring Road Agreement (as defined in Paragraph B below). PRELIMINARY STAlEMENTS A. Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Developer"), is the owner of that certain regional shopping center commonly known as The Promenade at Temecula located in Temecula, California (the "Shopping Center"). Developer intends to constnlct an expansion of the Shopping Center consisting of 126,000 square feet of additional retail and additional parking structures (the "Mall Expansion"). B. In connection with the Mall Expansion, Developer and the City entered into that certain Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007 (the "Ring Road Agreement"), Which provides, among other things, for the right and obligation of Developer to construct and/or install certain Ring Road Improvements. C. A condition of the Ring Road Agreement is the execution and delivery of this Guarantee by Guarantor in favor of the City. D. Developer is an affiliate of Guarantor, and Guarantor will derive substantial benefit from the aforedescribed transaction. AGREEMENT In consideration of the foregoing Preliminary Statements, which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor enters into the following agreement. 1. Guarantor hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees and promises to the City that the "Guaranteed Improvements" (as hereinafter defined) will be constructed, completed and paid for, as applicable, as described in and in accordance with the Ring Road Agreement, free and ctear from all defects and liens, and in compliance with all applicable laws (collectively, the "Constnlction Requirements''). For purposes hereof, "Guaranteed Improvements" shall mean (a) the construction and completion of the Ring Road Improvements described in the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan, other than the Ring Road Traffic Signals, subject to punchlist items, on or before January 31, 2009; (b) the construction and completion of the Ring Road Traffic Signals and any remaining punchlis! items in connection with the Ring Road Improvements on or before March 26, 2009 ("Completion Date"); and (c) the payment of City Cost to Complete (as hereinafter defined). 2. If; following a: failure by Developer to (a) construct and/or complete the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements when required, or (b) pay all costs of construction relating to the Guaranteed Improvements, then, upon the written demand of the City to Guarantor, Guarantor shaIl promptly commence and diligently pursue completion of the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements and Section I hereof, other than the performance or cure of those conditions or defaults of Developer that are purely personat to Developer and not capable of being performed or cured by Guarantor. In addition, pursuant to Section 4.D. of the Ring Road Agreement, if ihe Guaranteed Improvements have not been completed by the Completion Date, the City shaIl have the right to complete, at Guarantor's expense, those Ring Road Improvements which have not been completed in accordance with the Construction Requirements ("City Cost to Complete") without giving Guarantor the option to cure. Guarantor agrees to pay the City Cost to Complete within ten (10) days of receipt of invoices showing the costs incurred by the City along with such other commerciaIly reasonable documentation of the City Cost to Complete. Tbe obligations referred to in this Section 2 are hereinafter referred to coIlectively as the "Guaranteed Obligations" and individuaIly as a "Guaranteed Obligation". ~ Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Guarantee with respect to payments to third parties in connection with the construction and completion of the Guaranteed Improvements or the payment of the City Cost to Complete, this Guarantee is a guaranty of perfonnance only and not a guaranty of payment or coIlection. 3. Guarantor agrees that the City may exercise or not exercise any remedy or waiver of any right under the Ring Road Agreement without notice to, without consent of, and without affecting the liability of Guarantor hereunder. 4. Before calling upon Guarantor for payment or performance of any Guaranteed Obligations, the City need not resort to, or exhaust its remedies, if any, against, Developer or against any other party or parties liable thereon. If Guarantor fails to promptly perform the Guaranteed Obligations as required hereunder, the City may pursue any action at law or in equity against Guarantor. Guarantor further waives any right to require City to join Developer in any action brought hereunder or to commence any action against or obtain any judgment against Developer or to pursue any other remedy or enforce any other right. Guarantor further agrees that nothing contained . herein or otherwise shall prevent City from pursuing concurrently or successively all rights and remedies available to it ai law andlor in equity or under the Guaranteed Obligations and the exercise of any of its rights or the completion of any of its remedies shaIl not constitute a discharge of Guarantor's obligations hereunder, it being the purpose and intent of Guarantor that the obligations of Guarantor hereunder shalf be absolute, independent and unconditional under any and all circumstances whatsoever. . Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Guarantor hereby expressly waives any and all benefits and defenses under California Civil Code (ncc") Sections 2787 to 2855, inclusive, and 2899, 2953 and 3433, including, without limitation, the right to require City to (i) proceed against Developer or any other guarantor or pledgor, (ii) proceed against or exhaust any security or coIlateral City may hold, or (Hi) pursue any other right or remedy for the benefit of Guarantor. \ 5. None of the Guarantor's obligations under this Guarantee or any remedy for the enforcement thereof shaIl be impaired, modified, changed or released in any manner whatsoever by any impairment, modification, change, release or limitation of the liability of Developer under the Guaranteed Obligations or by reason of the bankruptcy of Developer or by reason of any creditor or bankruptey proceeding instituted by or against Developer. In addition, the liability of Guarantor shaIl in no way be released, mitigated or otherwise affected by (a) the release or discharge of 2 Developer in any creditors' proceeding, receivership, bankruptcy or other proceedings, or the commencement or pendency of any such proceedings; (b) the impairment, limitation or modification of the liability of Developer or the estate of developer in bankruptcy or of any remedy for the enforcement of Developer's liability under any instrument, evidencing any Guaranteed Obligation, or under any other instrument executed and delivered in connection therewith, resulting from the operation of any present or future provision of the United States Bankruptcy Code or other statute or from a decision in any court; or (c) any assignment or transfer of any instrument evidencing any Guaranteed Obligation by operation of law or otherwise. 6. All notices, demands, requests, approvals, consents and other communications (collectively, "Notices") which may be required or are desired to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be hand deliverelj, sent by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested, or sent by overnight courier service, designated for next-day delivery, as follows: If to Guarantor: Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Terminal Tower, Suite 1360 50 Public Square. Cleveland, Ohio 44113-2267 Attention: General Counsel With a copy to: Forest City Development California, Inc. 949 S. Hope Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90015 Attention: Brian Jones If to the City: City ofTemecula P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager Either party hereto may designate a different address to which or person to whom Notices shall be directed by written notice given in the same manner and directed to the other at its address hereinabove set forth. Any Notice given hereunder shall be deemed received when delivered if delivered by hand, one (1) business day after delivery jf sent overnight delivery service, designated for next-day delivery, and three (3) business days after mailing if sent by certified U.S. mail. 7. This Guarantee is effective immediately and shall continue until the completion of the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements. Guarantor waives notice of the acceptance hereof, waives demand for payment and protest relative to each Guaranteed Obligation (other than those required under this Guarantee), and waives all notices (other than those required under this Guarantee) to which Guarantor might otherwise be entitled by law. This Guarantee shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In the event of any action or proceeding relating to the enforcement of obligations of the undersigned hereunder by the City, the undersigned agrees to pay the City's reasonable attorney's fees in connection therewith. This Guarantee shall inure to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns, and to any other holder of any Guaranteed Obligation, and shli1l be binding upon the successors and assigns of Guarantor. At the request of Guarantor, the City agrees to deliver an instrument evidencing the termination of this Guarantee following termination according to the tenus of this Guarantee. 3 8. Guarantor and the City intend and believe that each provision in this Guarantee comports with all applicable local, state and federal laws and judicial decisions. However, if any provision or provisions, or any portion thereof, in this Guarantee is found by a court of law to be in violation of any applicable local, stale or federal ordinance, statute, law, administrative or judicial decision, or public policy, and if such court should declare such portion, provision or provisions of this Guarantee to be illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable as written, then it is the intent of Guarantor and the City that such portion, provision or provisions shall be given force to the fullest possible extent that they are legal, valid and enforceable, that the remainder of this Guarantee shall be construed as if such illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable portion, provision or provisions were not contained therein, and that the rights, obligations and interest of City under the remainder of this Guarantee sball continue in full force and effect. 9. Guarantor makes the following representations and warranties to the City: (a) Guarantor is duly fonned, validly existing and in good standing in the State of Ohio and has qualified to do business and is in good standing in any state in which it is necessary in the conduct of its business. (b) of this Guarantee. GUarantor maintains an office at the address set forth in the initial paragraph (c) The el!:ecution, delivery, and perfonnance by Guarantor of this. Guarantee does not and willl10t contravene or conflict with (i) any laws, order, rule, regulation, writ, injunction or decree now in effect of any government authority or court having jurisdiction over Guarantor, (ii) any contractual restriction binding on or affecting Guarantor or Guarantor's property or assets which may adversely affect. Guarantor's ability to fulfill its obligations under this Guarantee, (iii) the instruments creating any trust holding title to any assets included in Guarantor's financial statements, or (iv) the organizalional or other documents of Guarantor. (d) This Guarantee creates legal, valid, and binding obligations of Guarantor enforceable in accordance with its tenns. (e) There is no action, proceeding, or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of Guarantor, threatened or affecting Guarantor, which may materially and adversely affect Guarantor's ability to fulfill its obligations under this Guarantee. (f) All 10-K, lO-Q andlor other financial statements previousty furnished to the City to accurately reflect the financial condition and operation of Guarantor in all material respects as of the date of this Guarantee. (g) No consent, approval or authorization of or declaration, registration or filing with any governmental authority or nongovernmental person or entity, including any creditor or shareholder of Guarantor, is required in connection with the execution, delivery and perfonnance of this Guarantee. (b) The execution, delivery and performance of this . Guarantee has not constituted and will not constitute upon the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, a breach or default under any other agreement to which Guarantor is Ii party or may be bound or affected. 4 10. This Guarantee constitutes the entire agreement between Guarantor and the City with respect to the matters referred to herein, and no modification or waiver of any of the terms hereof shall be effective unless in writing, signed by the party to be charged with such modification or waiver. II. Guarantor's liability hereunder for any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations shall automatically terminate upon the earlier to occur of (a) the date the Guaranteed Obligations are completed or satisfied in accordance with the Ring Road Agreement, or (b) the date of any termination of the Ring Road Agreement due to any reason other than due to the default beyond any applicable notice andlor cure periods by the Developer of its obligations under the Ring Road Agreement. Guarantor has executed this Completion Guarantee as of the date first written above. GUARANTOR: FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio cotporation By: Name: Charles A. Ratner Title: President and Chief Executive Officer H:\W97\DJ<l\Temeoula121421Coolp1clioo Guaranty 06 21 07.doo s COMPLETION GUARANTEE THIS COMPLETION GUARANTEE (this "Guarantee") is executed as of the 24th day of July, 2007, by FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio corporation, having an address of Tenninal Tower, Suite I 100, 50 Public Square, Cleveland, Ohio 441 13 ("Guarantor"), to and in favor of the CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, a general law city in the State of California, having an address of 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590 ("City"). Capitalized tenns not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Ring Road Agreement (as defined in Paragraph B below). PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS A. Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Developer"), is the owner of that certain regional shopping center commonly known as The Promenade at Temecula located in Temecula, California (the "Shopping Center"). Developer intends to construct an expansion of the Shopping Center consisting of 126,000 square feet of additional retail and additional parking structures (the "Mall Expansion"). B. In connection with the Mall Expansion, Developer and the City entered into that certain Ring Road Enhancement Agreement, dated as of July 24, 2007 (the "Ring Road Agreement"), which provides, among other things, for the right and obligation of Developer to construct and/or install certain Ring Road Improvements. C. A condition of the Ring Road Agreement is the execution and delivery of this Guarantee by Guarantor in favor of the City. . D. Developer is an affiliate of Guarantor, and Guarantor will derive substantial benefit from the aforedescribed transaction. AGREEMENT In consideration of the foregoing Preliminary Stat~ments, which are incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Guarantor enters into the following agreement. I. Guarantor hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees and promises to the City that the "Guaranteed Improvements" (as hereinafter defined) will be constructed, completed and paid for, as applicable, as described in and in accordance with the Ring Road Agreement, free and clear from all defects and liens, and in compliance with all applicable laws (collectively, the "Construction Requirements"). For purposes hereof, "Guaranteed Improvements" shall mean (a) the construction and completion of the Ring Road Improvements described in the Approved Ring Road Enhancement Plan, other than the Ring Road Traffic Signals, subject to punchlist items, on or before January 31, 2009; (b) the construction and completion of the Ring Road Traffic Signals and any remaining punchlist items in connection with the Ring Road Improvements on or before March 26,2009 ("Completion Date"); and (c) the paymeilt of City Cost to Complete (as hereinafter defined). 2. If, following a failure by Developer to (a) construct and/or complete the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements when required, or (b) pay all costs of construction relating to the Guaranteed Improvements, then, upon the written demand of the City to Guarantor, Guarantor shall promptly commence and diligently pursue completion of the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements and Section I hereof, other than the performance or cure of those conditions or defaults of Developer that are purely personal to Developer and not capable of being performed or cured by Guarantor. In addition, pursuant to Section 4.D. of the Ring Road Agreement, if the Guaranteed Improvements have not been completed by the Completion Date, the City shall have the right to complete, at Guarantor's expense, those Ring Road Improvements which have not been completed in accordance with the Construction Requirements ("City Cost to Complete") without giving Guarantor the option to cure. Guarantor agrees to pay the City Cost to Complete within ten (10) days of receipt of invoices showing the costs incurred by the City along with such other commercially reasonable documentation of the City Cost to Complete. The obligations referred to in this Section 2 are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Guaranteed Obligations" and individually as a "Guaranteed Obligation". Except as otherwise expressly set forth in this Guarantee with respect to payments to third parties in connection with the construction and completion of the Guaranteed Improvements or the payment of the City Cost to Complete, this Guarantee is a guaranty of performance only and not a guaranty of payment or collection. 3. Guarantor agrees that the City may exercise or not exercise any remedy or waiver of any right under the Ring Road Agreement without notice to, without consent of, and without affecting the liability of Guarantor hereunder. 4. Before calling upon Guarantor for payment or performance of any Guaranteed Obligations, the City need not resort to, or exhaust its remedies, if any, against, Developer or against any other party or parties liable thereon. If Guarantor fails to promptly perform the Guaranteed Obligations as required hereunder, the City may pursue any action at law or in equity against Guarantor. Guarantor further waives any right to require City to join Developer in any action brought hereunder or to commence any action against or obtain any judgment against Developer or to pursue any other remedy or enforce any other right. Guarantor further agrees that nothing contained herein or otherwise shall prevent City from pursuing concurrently or successively all rights and remedies available to it at law andlor in equity or under the Guaranteed Obligations and the exercise of any of its rights or the completion of any of its remedies shall not constitute a discharge of Guarantor's obligations hereunder, it being the purpose and intent of Guarantor that the obligations of Guarantor hereunder shall be absolute, independent and unconditional under any and all circumstances whatsoever. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Guarantor hereby expressly waives any and all benefits and defenses under California Civil Code (ncc") Sections 2787 to 28SS, inclusive, and 2899, 29S3 and 3433, including, without limitation, the right to require City to (i) proceed against Developer or any other guarantor or pledgor, (ii) proceed against or exhaust any security or collateral City may hold, or (iii) pursue any other right or remedy for the benefit of Guarantor. S. None of the Guarantor's obligations under this Guarantee or any remedy for the enforcement thereof shall be impaired, modified, changed or released in any manner whatsoever by any impairment, modification, change, release or limitation of the liability of Developer under the Guaranteed Obligations or by reason of the bankruptcy of Developer or by reason of any creditor or bankruptcy proceeding instituted by or against Developer. In addition, the liability of Guarantor shall in no way be released, mitigated or otherwise affected by (a) the release or discharge of 2 Developer in any creditors' proceeding, receivership, bankruptcy or other proceedings, or the commencement or pendency of any such proceedings; (b) the impairment, limitation or modification of the liability of Developer or the estate of developer in bankruptcy or of any remedy for the enforcement of Developer's liability under any instrument, evidencing any Guaranteed Obligation, or under any other instrument executed and delivered in connection therewith, resulting from the operation of any present or future provision of the United States Bankruptcy Code or other statute or from a decision in any coUrt; or (c) any assignment or transfer of any instrument evidencing any Guaranteed Obligation by operation of law or otherwise, 6. All notices, demands, requests, approvals, consents and other communications (collectively, ''Notices'') which may be required or are desired to be given hereunder shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered, sent by certified U.S. Mail, return receipt requested, or sent by overnight courier service, designated for next-day delivery, as follows: If to Guarantor: With a copy to: If to the City: Forest City Enterprises, Inc. Tenninal Tower, Suite 1360 50 Public Square Cleveland, Ohio 44113-2267 Attention; General Counsel Forest City Development California, Inc. 949 S. Hope Street, Suite 200 Los Angeles, California 90015 Attention: Brian Jones City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager Either party hereto may designate a different address to which or person to whom Notices shall be directed by written notice given in the same manner and directed to the other at its address hereinabove set forth. Any Notice given hereunder shall be deemed received when delivered if delivered by hand, one (I) business day after delivery if sent overnight delivery service, designated for next-day delivery, and three (3) business days after mailing if sent by certified U.S. mail. 7. This Guarantee is effective immediately and shall continue until the completion of the Guaranteed Improvements in accordance with the Construction Requirements. Guarantor waives notice of the acceptance hereof, waives demand for payment and protest relative to each Guaranteed Obligation (other than those required under this Guarantee), and waives all notices (other than those required under this Guarantee) to which Guarantor might otherwise be entitled by law. This Guarantee shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the Stale of California. In the event of any action or proceeding relating to the enforcement of obligations of the undersigned hereunder by the City, the undersigned agrees to pay the City's reasonable attorney's fees in connection therewith. This Guarantee shall inure to the benefit of the City, its successors and assigns, and to any other holder of any Guaranteed Obligation, and shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of Guarantor. At the request of Guarantor, the City agrees to deliver an instrument evidencing the tennination ofthis Guarantee following termination according to the terms ofthis Guarantee. 3 8. Guarantor and the City intend and believe that each provision in this Guarantee comports with all applicable local, state and federal laws and judicial decisions. However, if any provision or provisions, or any portion thereof, in this Guarantee is found by a court of law to be in violation of any applicable local, state or federal ordinance, statute, law, administrative or judicial decision, or public policy, and if such court should declare such portion, provision or provisions of this Guarantee to be illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable as written, then it is the intent of Guarantor and the City that such portion, provision or provisions shall be given force to the fullest possible extent that they are legal, valid and enforceable, that the remainder of this Guarantee shall be construed as if such illegal, invalid, unlawful, void or unenforceable portion, provision or provisions were not contained therein, and that the rights, obligations and interest of City under the remainder of this Guarantee shall continue in full force and effect. 9. Guarantor makes the following representations and warranties to the City: (a) Guarantor is duly formed, validly existing and in good standing in the State of Ohio and has qualified to do business and is in good standing in any state in~which it is necessary in the conduct of its business. (bY of this Guarantee. Guarantor maintains an office at the address set forth in the initial paragraph (c) The execution, delivery, and performance by Guarantor of this Guarantee does not and will not contravene or contlict with (i) any laws, order, rule, regulation, writ, injunction or decree now in effect of any government authority or court having jurisdiction over Guarantor, (Ii) any contractual restriction binding on or affecting Guarantor or Guarantor's property or assets which may adversely affect Guarantor's ability to fulfill its obligations under this Guarantee, (iii) the instruments creating any trust holding title to any assets included in Guarantor's financial statements, or (Iv) the organizational or other documents of Guarantor. (d) This Guarantee creates legal, valid, and binding obligations of Guarantor enforceable in accordance with its terms. (e) There is no action, proceeding, or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of Guarantor, threatened or affecting Guarantor, which may materially and adversely affect Guarantor's ability to fulfill its obligations under this Guarantee. (f) All IO-K, IO-Q and/or other financial statements previously furnished to the City to accurately reflect the financial condition and operation of Guarantor in all material respects as of the date of this Guarantee. (g) No consent, approval or authorization of or declaration, registration or filing with any governmental authority or nongovernmental person or entity, including any creditor or shareholder of Guarantor, is required in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this Guarantee. (h) The execution, delivery and penormance of this Guarantee has not constituted and will not constitute upon the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, a breach or default under any other agreement to which Guarantor is a party or may be bound or affected. 4 10. This Guarantee constitutes the entire agreement between Guarantor and the City with respect to the matters referred to herein, and no modification or waiver of any of the terms hereof shall be effective unless in writing, signed by the party to be charged with such modification or waiver. 11. Guarantor's liability hereunder for any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations shall automatically terminate upon the earlier to occur of (a) the date the Guaranteed Obligations are completed or satisfied in accordance with the Ring Road Agreement, or (b) the date of any termination of the Ring Road Agreement due to any reason other than due to the default beyond any applicable notice and/or cure periods by the Developer of its obligations under the Ring Road Agreement. Guarantor has executed this Completion Guarantee as of the date first written above. GUARANTOR: FOREST CITY ENTERPRISES, INC., an Ohio corporation \I By: Name: Charles A. Ratner Title: President and Chief Executive Officer H:IW97\DIGITemeculaI2142ICcmpletiun Guaranty 06 07 07.duc 5 DATE: MINUTE ACTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA July 26, 2007 July 24, 2007 MEETING OF: AGENDA . ITEM NUMBER: 21 SUBJECT: Temecula Promenade Mall East Parking Facility Owner Participation Agreement. Ground Sublease. Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. and Parkina Manaaement Agreement The motion was made by Council Member Comerchero, and seconded by Council Member Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 The City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 07-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS FOR THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE EAST PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Comerchero. Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS None R:JMinute OrderslO72407 The motion was made by Council Member Comerchero, and seconded by Council Member Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 21.2 The City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 07-64 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT, A GROUND SUBLEASE, AND A PARKING MANAGEMErfr AGREEMENT FOR THE EAST PARKING FACILITY, AND APPROVING THE RING ROAD ENHANCEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PROMENADE MALL The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCil MEMBERS: Comerchero. Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington NOES: 0 COUNCil MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCil MEMBERS None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS None The motion was made by Agency Member Comerchero, and seconded by Agency Member Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 21.3 The Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 07-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS FOR THE USE OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS BY THE AGENCY FOR THE PURCHASE OF THE EAST PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 33445 R:lMinute Ordel$/072407 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS None ABSTAIN: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS None The motion was made by Agency Member Comerchero, and seconded by Agency Member Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 21.4 The Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 07-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING AN OWNER . PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT, A GROUND SUBLEASE FOR THE EAST PARKING FACILITY, AND A PARKING MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE EAST PARKING FACILITY The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None AGENCY MEMBERS None AGENCY MEMBERS None The motion was made by Agency Member Comerchero, and seconded by Agency Member Roberts, to approve staff recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: 21.5 The Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 07-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DESIGNATING CONSULTANTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF TAX ALLOCATION BONDS FOR PARKING FACILITIES AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO R:lMinute Ordersf072407 The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards NOES: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS None ABSTAIN: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS None STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) 55 CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk/Agency Secretary for the City ofTemecula Redevelopment Agency, DO HEREBY CERTIFY, under penalty of perjury, the foregoing to be the official action taken by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency at the above meeting. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 26th day of July, 2007. R:lMinute OrderslO72407 ATTACHMENT NO.3 PLAN REDUCTIONS RING ROAD ENHANCEMENT PLAN G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 8 0: .. ~ fi I~i lIilil n ,- 's i i ~ ~~ PPi ~ ~~ I !I ddi ~d~ ! ~~ n! ~! ,! ~i ~ , " ~ II ; d; ~ i v <j r;; 'i i ill ~ i!ll Ii III R; I .. I nl~ o g ~ i ~I ~i R. o,s ml~~~' J c~:;U I /', ~/ .,~., I I I ~ i I ! i ~j i ~ i ! . elimltl lHID~.1 z CI)~ <(zl-Z ...Joza: a._w~ GCI):E:J Z z<( W <l: '" 'i - >0 Ca.o . <(><~<l: ~wa.5 Gw:EO _w, ...JC ::':!:' <(<(CW ~z<(1- I-wol1. a.:E~O Wo > o 'I< I- Z~'-'- a.ZO o O:Z o - -- n'i' !!'i!lji ol!.o" oiil'i~!i h:!l!!:I~ ,.!lo!'1 ili III'! ,I, i'ih I i;l ,,' n iii WOo<'ol.oltf''''''' "",g-'OOOd-W-O';L\!lMo\,'" !! li!"'I-' i';~, , "'-~'l' i,"-' , "l"~';' ~ll: i"'2 ii 1'!i.1!; i'I'I"1 Ii! ~! 'Ii ;~, iliil!l~I'l~,"!i! 1;liilfj'! g~liil!~~ ~ IS~I;:" ~!:.~~iI :ilih!i mll IUUlllllll 111111 ;:l:zun ,111I1 liliiiii D- <[ " >- ~ ~ . i'S i u '> .. .;.. .: .... l ~~~-~ ,-- ,-~;;:;;;:: ""i:'~ '- '~';':::5'~>" " '." ,,~~ ~ 'j i ,: II i ~~ III III -ill! Il II.:: ili!!!nmn l!lIl~~llllj' if! \ .J! Illi I !I , iill i lltll!!!!!II'll!1 ~~ heuuD'!; e 1:1 allllllllllllllWI 11 i! ::~~~:~~l: ~:"'@ g ~ i'i !< ~~!:!~I!I ;,1 I; ll; = I Ilg,! . Ii:! l I II ; ii I l!:!l ~~~ b ~':i! b ~~ ~ I!Igi~1 ;~!~ I ill: i i. i i!!I!i ;,,1 I 0'1' I ': I iii j' ll~l i!!l,i !!is I i!ii~! . Ill' ",-', ,0 ~ , I ~!'i 11~~!i 1!ll!1 i~!,i; '1';'li '!"'l '~"I!~ ~'!l!' ~ ilil' :::lI!liI!l,jI ..~li - ili",~~-:J. "'1' i'I'! i,!.1 '!jld ~Iillt ':'!I~ lilil~ I;llig I, ~ ij r ~I"i!' :1"1 ! I l U:I;jdiiill llii .:,o0i I !!~!ld!.!I:1 :, ;, ,~:! . ,'.. "'!' "I""h! < 0 II " II! - j' I I' II Ii. oj' ~. r ' 'Iihil! I, ;li ;;!l Il~ l;j !!ll i~il il:1 :~; ill! ! 'I ' ill .Iil .;i'!~:!~II~; !l l!~ li!;l !;! i!~li ~;!! I,! ~; i~,!11 i I I ! III 111'1 i;~'!lji;i!!I~ I '! !,. !i,!, i': ,i'lll, II !hi, i~!' , ' ~ II, '. 'I-!i- 'oi"I"! , ~.i II il! !"g, -,'I !!lll 'j I lii~I'li:I.! · ~ I I:; I" ,;o!I" :~,!ii II.!'! ' ;1 ; ,II 1"1!,li' !'il' ~~ I' ~'Ei ll'!';'~' 'I' ,; ~ .:"1 ~~'!!li Iii ~ I' !i m Iii!!!!!' Ii!!;!!, lil!ili1il;!I! i!i i Ii! 1M ~l;jil!i!!i;i .Ii!i i ~I 11;!I:! ,Mi~;;l!l'~!iii!~ ~. ,B~l!~,!n ii~ I i'l t!!1 i"'i!~!I!li! ~i!;l! ;!I !!ill; ;1:!;illillllnliil !h,ll!!!l !" ill ! ~~~Iiii! t!h",II!j ';"" ~m!E I!:: 'i'l ! ~"'il'I;'~' ,'!m. , 1!-.I..,.~ I~' "i4~E ...1',Mi'I'; I ' ,,!, i. -1:'1 I!!~ n !!:I'!III::~!:I~( ~li~'::il'~!'~l l :i1d1i, iglllg:!!l! j!.!! is, I:' I!, ,I 'Ill; 'I ~1"oS"~I.'''' ", !"I' ., , ,I,j!1 g, Eo,"'lh. ,,', In 'I! ~.; i~ :l~ ;: lil~ ll!!;;13"f;~~-" I!I ~ii ;:Eg~r ~i mil1~~f~~ ~15 "g~~ii~"i~ ..S>\ * <S ~S!iij iiii;I!!! !lnU!lill~,11 JUdiiil lI!i,II'!ilii'lmniii:!!U !!d~ 11!;e !ji~ -.~ ji;,il,!!o, !I "I~l!l!!! h, i "". ",,,I. " ",.. . :K:," ";..0 .; .; ~., -.......; "2;: -!:! ~:::e:!i! !!! !!! 2;;.::l :3 . ....,... ,~ '-::f~'tt-~ i ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ -0 w ~~ ~I ~!1 w ~ " ~ o _ 0: " .. se ~ 'i! II; ill III I ; i , i ~1 , " . ., , o I; / f if ! ! Ii J ~:::-- i i I I I ; .."'..." ........../i ........// .~ -<>" ... ::~~::::::~"..~;::.... j,;,,' !>~\. , , <n"""d-~"-O""'\""'o\" -""""gO/t./I_"" , m N ~ i ! i : I i Ii. OIlD i i! w ~_ ! ~! ~ ~~ '"1 , II! I II' , iil '. h Ii , . " ~~ ; ., " ., ; , . . \~k\ . \\'. .. '''\- 1.1 I ; ~~~i.. ",ili.. l:! "!i <l ~ ili _ 8 1,ld!' , ~ ~ l'l '",. ,'!> ~. ::;~ iH . ~ l!:I'~, ! . d II' '" o! ~ ~ ffi I" i!! fi I ! ~ !! o'"!l!d!; ,~ ~L~~"'$;I~ Sa O~~''l'!3o m ~n: ""<O!"1I1' g,:~~~~::~~~= "'mii!!I!!1 zUlI!" I, 8eeeeeee@@@@ w ~ ; ~ .~ < s. o :5 ~ II i; " tn l: I:. / / / /, )// ~/ ./ ",,/ ,<P.' ", ',' _ ""a"=.-""-"!l';L\"",O\:~ .... ~.'ll' OO/l{' ~ <'l b ~ !II ~ 8 ~ ~ ": iIi 1';1 , ~I., ( ~~j~ ~ .",; ! U) ~; g g 5 It d'!!'''!i ~ H l'~ ! z! I!;! ~ ! Q~:6~~~~~ ti.. ,"" ~ h ~ ~:., ~i i i ii; I i z!ii!in! 8eeese@@@ ! I ! ~ !i ; , ! I i ! . z ' R 0 ~~ DlIlGJ ~ ~~ wt ~ ~~~ !!1 ~ ~ ;: .. ~/:;)i II rl ~J J ";;1 /!. ;., 'i ~ ... ~ J ..~ "~\ \ , '\. '.l\ " \\ \ ,~, -~~ \' Ijl_~~jl<:~:~."":,"~~<",,, \".m", , . '>::, " \ \ 'J . ,. / .' .' '" "'.,. " ~!i' I' rrf" l f , ; ~'<'<";", /1 -'-',,- ~",", '...'~ fl'" , "'''-'.... .l~. L____..,) "I Ill!! 'U 'ji ! ! 1 ! j , , ~l! , " . ., , " .-'f'-. \ ~,~i, \\ ; \ ' , \, /' "-----~... .~ 'l,..! t( . !; ,; w ! i 'i '-~r \lli F U i+-_ f'""l !~~.1 i j ? ~ i. " \: \.)}". \. , \ \ \ :l:ll..... ; , : " , \\\\,\\. \"\ \\ \'l~\ \' " \... \;,:' ""'a"'OO'''HI''-~'\lJO,o\:O ,"o<o",""{,{,,,,,,, l>I e ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ lq : I , \11l'> .. > t ::: ; t. ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ l'> ~ !! CI.I ,; ~ ~ ~ i'! &l It UJ!5 ~ G "!5 a I- is : ~ ~ "- ~ j[ ~ i !1!!! !! Iii ~55! ~~~I~~~ () -< -< ~ ~ ~ I, ... t; '., "" : --!lll WilHhm l5 i! !; : ~e@@@@ osee 8'=1 , ! I i g ; ; i ! ! 'I 0110, ~ ~~ i'i ~~ a -0 w ~~ ~I'~ ii ~ a: . <L ~ " ;; ~ ""I' ."-".,~_"..~ 7 '"'--"-. ~. <<,..,<. rL.~~.__. f "'~' I , " s~ 5 ! '!I ! II' i.! '. !111 i ; , i ~!.~ " . ., , " "'~\,\ \'\ /.~ \ i... \c\Z,'\ l , , ~\ WO'1H' ",,/ll< """ """'''''''d-""-O",,'''''''O\=<> I I ~ ~ i 8 ; ; i I I OIlD i il wL P! ~ ~~ ~ '" ~ - '- ,,-~' \ " \'c:~ ,f ~!(;7~ '!~\\:\ \\\ /' ,,-,,, ;; / 1'1'- ,\,,' \~ e,:'f/; /, c~l~.\, \ ~{: ;. :;\:1" r~\r!:::; · .-:1,;\:: ' ; \\\1 ,r- !I _ ij'i I,r >" 'J I , , ".,,1 ,e! ! II! ill' I.! ill I"~ ! I ~! , ., , ., , " tnt''''.- I , \ 'y---~-~.._~ t , . ~ , ~ ,. ; ~ : ~ r~; .I, i ~ I! ~ I,' ~.d ~ ~ ~ ill:;!'! ! l- ~ ~ 0;:; rf l!!W! ! z",!. , Q<i<i:n::g~~ ~~~~~~jg.. 1""" i! '1< ~m!!1 o0ees@@@ ~....l..[. -~: ! : i : ~_.. ~I ,1+ ;, ~~ \ b"", ;} ~ 'I ".e. ~'\~,,\ I I 1-,. '~'Z\" ~.~-i ~~11 "':e.1~i.;~C:;~2:"i~ .><<,:,..L,,,~o't~~.- t~,,'~[~::: e"i ~. I ~I Y\\. '. \\ \"\ . ,e " -) /::}'/-- ".. .'7""'':''~'- ...... /; -/ ''-. ~<>- e /'C,;s;,:V 1':., . - - /// //1{,:,/ ~- '/// /J!fii -:" /" A ~l" / / r - -----...... <> OVOH H3.1S~:)NIM ......:<:........L............if~j-. .-:;7=.~::~1:"":3~:._.-. ......... ..:.- . ...:::.:........~ 3:~f1;;r;' "~< ,:\1 p' jl.----- i '. ~..' ;!; L l_ f" i ., " , il e. ;, " " j, 'j 'i~. //11 // :' "'/, .'~"" .... -::., ;~;;c;. '=:R~~'~~;~ \\ \ \ /,,,.--. / // ~ ,-'....' _....v. t; \ II' ~~~~ . '. \.\. .'\~ \ '., '\,~ \'\. \, ~'% \-- \"...~..'........ '-, \ .. \ \ i~i ',. , i.\ ,'j :, i , 'n' \ \\ .",- \-" I' 1\ \'..;,: '-\ \..~.tM !..\\." , . , \ \ :<:~<ll\. \ \ ~\\\.\ ~\\~ \-, ~~t,~r ;'~\\J \ \ \\~:>-., " \~ j'*'( . .~,~~ b .~~ ~O' /.. ",~" ./ ""Q ~il;-( ~"E.1-;/ "r ,-" ~ y ~ ~ .. , .. .. ,\" .'. iIb .>;" '""" (>lI<T"""".~""-oo',,\""a\'" <00'0'''.0(11' ;/ ."'".,~~~ ; r.',......._______. -. " rf""":o,...."..,):..:~ i \ ! Y'--~---- f ! i \\\ \~ '~ ". """" " ,. ~ i1i ',. L ., ii ~~ ~ig! ! ~~!~ ~ Z~~g !f o ." ~ \1_ [i:;H! ~~"~t;~ t,;ih'g ZS8i:\~", 8ee@@@ ! ! I , ! ! ; ! ! 0110 m CO ~ ~ ~~ I ~~ Ul -~ w ~_ 5' ~~ h: :i! ~. .. "I , IiI ! 'Ii : ill II. I ~ ~.! " , " , " , ~ , j , ATTACHMENT NO.4 DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 9 1118107 f6) ~(c,1~n\\J7~~ ~ l~i l\ulV to, b"' Temecula Promenade Mall Ring Road EnhancemE8YElaJL____~_ The Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Plan was developed to address a range of issues currently affecting traffic operations on the Ring Road and primary access drives serving the Mall. The principal issues pertain to safety and involve, traffic conflicts, traffic congestion, and excessive traffic speed. The Mall Ring Road Enhancement Plan will be implemented in two phases. Phase 1 will be implemented immediately and contains the majority of the improvements and circulation system modifications. Once Phase 1 of the plan has been completed, traffic operating conditions will be monitored and evaluated. Phase 2 circulation system modifications are optional and the need for implementation of individual Phase 2 components will be determined by the results of the analysis of traffic conditions after Phase 1 improvements have been implemented. Features of the Ring Road Enhancement Plan are described below. Along with the identification of each feature is a statement of the intended result. Phase 1 Ring Road Intersection Modifications 1) Signalize the following key Ring Road external access intersections: . Winchester West . Ynez North Function - Improve control and safety of traffic operations at the two most heavily used external access intersections on the Ring Road. 2) Modify the following Ring Road external access intersections to include additional signing and clear lane delineation at each approach: . Winchester East . Ynez South Move the stop bars on the Ring Road approaches to create a smaller intersection at each location. At Winchester East, add a separate right turn lane at the westbound intersection approach. Function - Improve driver understanding of designated right-of-way, improve safety, and reduce traffic delay at both Ring Road approaches. 3) Convert the following Ring Road external access intersections from 2-way Stop to AII- way Stop control: . North General Kearny Road Function - Improve control and safety of traffic operations and reduce traffic delay at both Ring Road approaches. 1 11/8/07 4) Add All-way Stop control on the Ring Road at the following locations: . Proposed Mall Main Street . Bel Villaggio Primary Access Driveway (Crosswalk on East and South Sides) . Proposed Power Center 1 Driveway (Crosswalk on North and East Sides) . Center Driveway serving NW Restaurant Area (Crosswalk on North and West Sides) Function - Improve traffic control, calm traffic and improve safety of traffic operations. New Power Center 1 driveway improves access to the center and reduces traffic congestion along Verdes Lane. Phase 1 Ring Road Pavement Striping Re-stripe all faded and worn pavement markings along the Ring Road and on external access roadways. Pavement marking to be replaced includes- lane lines, stop bars, crosswalks, and turn lane arrows. Phase 1 Ring Road Sight Distance Improvements 1) Correct sight distance problem at JC Penney Main Aisle intersection with Ring Road immediately west of the Winchester West access intersection through closure of the drive aisle. 2) Correct sight distance problem at Macy's Main Aisle intersections with Ring Road immediately west of the Promenade Way intersection through the trimming/removal of plant hedges adjacent to the drive aisles near the intersection. 3) Correct sight distance problem at J. C. Penny Main Aisle intersections with Ring Road approximately mid-way between Winchester Eastand Winchester West through the trimming/removal of plant hedges adjacent to the drive aisles near the intersection. 4) Trim trees overhanging the along the southbound Ring Road approach to Ynez North and Ynez South access intersections and at any other locations where tree and/or plant foliage is blocking the line of sight to traffic control devices (e.g. signs and signals). 5) A sight distance problem at the drive/parking aisle immediately south of the Sears Auto Center is being mitigated by the installation of a 4-Way Stop control at the new Power Center 1 access driveway. Phase 1 Ring Road Access Modifications Phase 1 will include many parking/drive aisle closures along the Ring Road. In most cases the aisle closures are located in close proximity to the principal access intersections. Others are adjacent to new 4-Way Stop intersection locations on the Ring Road. Refer to the Ring Road Enhancement Plan for the actual location of proposed aisle closures. There are two parking aisles in the vicinity of Winchester West and one aisle in the vicinity of Winchester. 2 11/8/07 East that will be monitored to determine whether they will need to be closed in Phase 2 of the Ring Road Enhancement Plan. There are two locations where raised channelizers are proposed along the centerline of the Ring Road to prohibit left turns from and onto the Ring Road. One location extends from Ynez North to the north along the Ring Road centerline for about 175 feet. The second extends from Winchester West to the west along the Ring Road centerline for about 150 feet. One access modification includes the realignment of the Bel Villaggio access driveway with the proposed Main Street to create and aligned intersection that can be controlled by a 4- Way Stop with pedestrian crosswalks. This intersection will be reconstructed with a speed table to calm traffic and facilitate pedestrian movements across the intersection. External Access Road Striping Modifications 1. Re-stripe Verdes Lane access road to include one 14-foot travel lane in each direction and 12-foot center left turn bays at intersections. 2. Re-stripe northbound Promenade Way approach at the Ring Road intersection to include separate left and right turn lanes. 3 ATTACHMENT NO.5 PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-_ G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 10 PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0316, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO PA97-0118 (PROMENADE MALL) TO PROVIDE FOR VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS TO THE RING ROAD. SITE MODIFICATIONS INCLUDE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ADDITIONAL ALL-WAY STOPS, ACCESS RECONFIGURATION, MODIFIED STRIPING AND SIGNAGE, PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS, AND AISLE CLOSURES WITH ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS. Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) and Environmental Impact Report No. 340. B. The City, Forest City Development California, Inc., a California Corporation, and LGA-7, Inc., an Illinois Corporation, entered into a Development Agreement dated December 17, 1996 for the development of the Temecula Regional Center. The Development Agreement was recorded on December 30, 1996 as Document No. 488428 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside pursuant to Government Code Sections 65864 et seq. C. On September 12, 2006 the City Council introduced, and on September 26, 2006 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 06-10 which approved the First Amendment to the Development Agreement extending the term of the Development Agreement to January 16, 2010. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement was recorded on October 11, 2006 as Document No. 06-0748777 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside pursuant to Government Code Section 65864 et seq. Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., a California Limited Partnership ("Developer") is the successor in interest to the Owner's rights in the Development Agreement. D. In adopting Ordinance No. 06-10, the City Council found that a supplemental or subsequent EIR need not be prepared, and that the City may rely on the Addendum to approve the proposed extension to the Development Agreement and the construction of the Final Phase of the Specific Plan ("Addendum"). A Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk of Riverside County as required by law on September 13, 2006. E. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\Jan 2008 Mall PC Reso - Ring Rd Enhancement Plan,DOC [ F. On July 24, 2007 the City Council approved the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. The agreement outlined that both the City and Temecula Town Center Associates desire the Ring Road surrounding the Promenade Mall be enhanced so as to improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. G. On November 9,2007, Forest City Development filed Planning Application No. PA07-0316, a Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan to provide vehicular and pedestrian enhancements in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. I. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 16, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff, Developer and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. J. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-0316, subject to and based upon the findings set forth in this Resolution. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further FindinQs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula, Specific Plan No. 263, the Development Agreement, and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the land use and circulation goals and policies in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The project involves the modification of the existing Ring Road, access and parking areas. No development is proposed with this project. The modifications will result in pedestrian and vehicular enhancements which will improve access and make it easier for the public to use the Ring Road. Additionally, the Major Modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\Jan 2008 Mall PC Reso.~ Ring Rd Enhancement Plan. DOC 2 The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The site plan modifications to access, parking/landscape layout, striping and signage will enhance the Ring Road. Additionally, the major modification is consistent with the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement executed by the City Council on July 24, 2007. Section 3. Environmental Determinations. A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, approved by the Council as EIR No. 340 on October 11, 1994, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein, the City Council's approval of the Addendum to the FEIR on September 26, 2006, and the subsequent environmental reviews of development plans for the Mall following approval of the Development Agreement. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancements does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. B. Specifically, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the FEIR and Addendum. The Ring Road Enhancement Plan does not include any expansion of existing uses or retail square footage and therefore would not result in any additional trip generation. The Ring Road Plan will result in modified traffic patterns within the Mall property to improve pedestrian and vehicle circulation. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15164) is the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification, and no additional environmental documentation is required. C. In addition, based on the findings set forth above, the actions approved by this Resolution are exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") by virtue of the categorical and statutory exemptions set forth in the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.) Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities because the project consists of the minor alteration of existing streets for the purpose of public safety. The Ring Road enhancements will not result in the expansion of any use. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\Jan 2008 Mal] PC Reso ~ Ring Rd Enhancement Plan. DOC 3 D. The custodian of records for the Initial Study and FEIR for the Development Agreement and Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, the Addendum prepared in connection with the First Amendment to the Development Agreement extending the term of the Development Agreement, and all other materials, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based, is the Planning Department of the City of Temecula. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department located at the Planning Department of the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Section 4. Approvals. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-0316 subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\PlanningVan 2008 Mall PC ResQ - Ring Rd Enhancement Plan. DOC 4 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 16th day of January 2008. ,Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 16th day of January 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\Jan 2008 Mal! PC Reso - Ring Rd Enhancement Plan. DOC 5 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft CQA.doc 1 Kitzerow ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I, (print name) understand that Planning Application No. PA07-0316 has been approved with Conditions of Approval which are set forth in Exhibit A. I have read the Conditions of Approval contained in PC Resolution No. 08- and understand them. Through signing this ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, I agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions. SIGNA TURE DATE G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 2 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA07-0316 Project Description: A Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road at the Promenade Mall. Site modifications include additional traffic signals, additional all-way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage, enhanced pedestrian crossings, and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-420-005 thru-009 MSHCP Category: Not Applicable per Development Agreement DIF Category: Not Applicable per Development Agreement TUMF Catllgory: Retail Commercial Development Mitigation Fee: $2.00/SF per Development Agreement Approval Date: January 22, 2008 (anticipated City Council hearing) Expiration Date: January 22, 2010 WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT Planning Department 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 3 3. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 4 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 5 Planning Department 4. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification except as modified herein: a. Enhanced paving shall be provided for pedestrian crosswalks at the Ring Road where Main Street will connect to Bel Villaggio. b. ADA ramps shall be provided at all pedestrian crosswalks. Public Works Department 5. All Conditions of Approval for PA06~0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. 6. The Ring Road circulation system consists of a four lane, private looped road; radial private approach roads from public arterials; drive aisle connectors 10 the mall buildings; and, access driveways to surrounding properties. Modification and enhancement improvements to the Ring Road circulation system intend to eliminate confusion at intersections by improving traffic control and operations; reducing delay to the Ring Road approaches; calming traffic at key pedestrian and vehicular access locations; eliminating sight distance constraints; and, improving signage and directional striping. Implementation of the improvements occurs in two phases. The Phase 1 improvements represent a plan to be considered and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council on or before April 15, 2008. Phase 2 improvements will be based on two traffic studies and other potential improvements as deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works. a. Phase 1 improvements (see attached exhibits) i. Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road West and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Winchester East. ii. Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road North and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. Install conduit and pre-wire for a potential traffic signal at Ynez Road South. iii. Install six all-way stops at designated approach roads and access driveways. iv. Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. v. Install a two-way stop with enhanced signage at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. vi. Improve access driveways to Bel Villaggio including pedestrian crosswalks and a speed table at the intersection with proposed Main Street. vii. Remove and close off 16 drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\Draft PC COAs.doc 6 viii. Add new turn lanes on the Ring Road circulation systern: right turn to Winchester Road East; left turn from Winchester Road West; left turn from Ynez Road North; and, left turn from North General Kearny. ix. Install signing and striping improvements for the entire Ring Road circulation system. b. Phase 2 improvements (see attached exhibits) At the Director of Public Works' discretion certain additional improvements to the Ring Road circulation system may be necessary. The applicant agrees to conduct up to two (2) traffic studies of the Ring Road circulation system. The applicant intends to conduct the first study in calendar year 2008 after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements. The applicant expects to conduct a second study in calendar year 2009 after the completion of the Main Street and mall building improvements. At any time after the completion of the Phase 1 improvements and within the times established in the Promenade Mall Ring Road Enhancement Agreement. the Director of Public Works may direct completion of the following improvements: i. Install a traffic signal at Winchester Road East and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Winchester Road. ii. Install a traffic signal at Ynez Road South and the Ring Road. Coordinate the traffic signal operation with the existing traffic signal system on Ynez Road. iii. Remove and close off up to three drive aisle connectors to the mall buildings parking access. iv. Additional improvements warranted by the traffic studies and identified necessary by the Director of Public Works requires future agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Center Associates. v. The project results in the loss of landscaping at drive aisles and medians, however the Promenade Mall site remains consistent with the landscaping requirements in the Specific Plan. The project also results in the net gain of one parking space for the site. Building and Safety Department 7. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification, except as modified herein. 8. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. Please note, plans submitted after December 31, 2007 will be required to meet the provisions of the California 2007 model codes. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Plarining\draft COA.doc 7 9. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 10. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 11. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 12. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays 13. Submit at time of plan review, electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 14. Submit at time of plan review, precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities as applicable to scope of work for plan review. 15. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Fire Prevention Bureau 16. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 17. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Police Department 18. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286. Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 8 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft CQA.doc 9 Planning Department 19. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application. and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 20. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Fire Prevention Bureau 21. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 22. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\PJanning\draft COAdoc 10 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 11 Planning Department 23. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 24. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Building and Safety Department 25. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293. Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. 26. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Fire Prevention Bureau 27. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Pians, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 28. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 12 PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY THIS PERMIT G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 13 Planning Department 29. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Public Works Department 30. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Fire Prevention Bureau 31. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application. and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification. Community Services Department 32. All Conditions of Approval for PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans, PA07-0154, Modification Application, and PA07-0286, Major Modification shall apply to this Major Modification G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\draft COA.doc 14 ATTACHMENT NO.6 INITIAL STUDY G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 11 INITIAL STUDY FOR TEMECUlA REGIONAL CENTER FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PHASE Prepared for: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Prepared by: Tom Dodson & Associates . , 2150 North Arrowhead Avenue . San Bernardino, California 92405 August 2006 . " Cily of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ............................................................................... 1 II. PROJECT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 1 III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ................................... 10 IV. DETERMINATION ..................................................................................................... 10 V. IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST REFERENCES ..........;................................. 12 VI. IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST & DISCUSSION ........................................... 14 1. Land Use & Planning ........................................................................................ 14 2. Public.Services..................................................................... .................:........... 16 3. Utilities and Service Systems............................................................................ 19 4. Population & Housing ....................................................................................... 22 5. Transportation I Circulation...............,............................................................... . 23 6. W ater................................................................................................................: 26 7. Biological Resources ........................................................................................ 28 .8~ Energy and Mineral Resources ........................................................................ 30 9. Cultural Resources ........................................................................................... 32 10, Recreation ......................................................................................................... 33 11. Aesthetics........... ....................................................................................... ........ 34 12. Geophysical ................:..................................................................................... 36 13. Hazards ............................................................................................................. 38 14. Noise .................................................................................................................. 40 15. Air Quality..........................................................................................,............... 42 16. Mandatory Finding of Significance.................................................................... 43 17. Department of Fish and Game 'De Minimis' Impact Findings .......................... 45 18. Earlier Analyses ....~........................................................;.................................. 45 ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1: Specific impacts that are unavoidable are listed on page which is reproduced as . Attachment 1 to this document Temecula Regional Center hlltial SIudy/OB3106 -ii- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Regional Location Site Location Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylOB3106 -iii- TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES CITY OF TEMECULA . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Initial Study .I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. Project Title: 2. Lead Agency: Address: 3. Contact Person: Phone Number: 4. Project Location: Temecula Regional Center First Amendment to Development Agreement and Final Development Phase City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Don Hazen, Principal Planner City of Temecula (951) 694-6400 The proposed project is an amendment to extend a Development Agreement and the final phase of development within the 179 acre (excluding roads) Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) in the City of T emecula bound by Winchester Road to the north, Margarita Road to the east, Overland Road to the south and Ynez Road to the west within an unsectioned area of Township 7 South, Range 3 West San Bernardino Meridian on the USGS Murrieta Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map (see Figures 1 and 2). 5. Project Description Summary: A proposed Development Agreement Amendment to extend the term of the Temecula Regional Center Development Agreement an additional three years to provide for the future development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the T emecula Regional Center Specific Plan. 6. Project Sponsor: 1/. . PROJECT ASSESSMENT Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P. Background, Purpose, and Need The City of Temecula proposes to extehd a Development Agreement (due to expire in January 2007) for a period of three years to expire on January 16, 2010, for subsequent construction of the final phase of retail commercial space and parking facilities within the Temecula Regional Center core commercial area in an area currently existing as a paved parking lot. The proposed project would be developed within Planning Area 2 of the TemeculaRegional Center Specific Plan (SP 263) located primarily between the current Macy's department store and Edwards Cinema and also on . the north side of the Edwards Cinema within the current.core shopping area. The existing Regional Center currently has 2, 117,545 square feet of existing and approved development. The approved Specific Plan for the T emecula Regional Center allows up to 2,483,000 square feet of development. The extension of the Development Agreement would cohtinue the agreement with the City under Temecula Regional Center Initial Study!083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City ofT emecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY which the development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the Specific Plan would be implemented. In 1993 the City of Temecula certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the construction and occupancy of a new regional retail center, business and office center, and hotel and residential area, entitled the "Temecula Regional Center EIR". The EIR addressed the construction and operation of all allowed uses and intensities of uses for the proposed regional center. These land uses and intensities are listed in Table 1. The land use intensities adopted in the preferred alternative are somewhat less than would be allowed by the general land use guidelines based on the floor to area ratio given of Table 1 - Detailed Land Use Summary - of the Specific Plan. TABLE 1 Detailed land Use Summary Adopted Land Use Intensity Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 Land Use Floor Area Acres in Adopted Land Ratio Planning Use Intensity Area (Square Feet) Mixed Use .25-1 169.67 1,673,000 Retail, Commercial, . Core/Support Retail . Business Park/Office .40-1 5.49 810,000 Subtotal 175.26 2,483,000 Roads 26.04 0 Project Total . 201.30 2,483,000 Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/OB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Tem~cula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY The T emecula Regional Center currently has the following existing and approved square footage of development (existing and approved development plans): Table 2 Approved, Existing and Proposed Development Specific Plan 26~ - Temecula Regional Center Existing Approved Total Existing (Square Feet) and/or under and/or approved construction (Square Feet) (Square Feet) Mixed Use Retail, Commercial, Core/Support Retail, Business Park/Office 2,099,195 .18,350 2,117,545 The current Development Agreement, adopted in December 1996, sets forth the obligations ofthe developer and the City required to be met in order for development of the Specific Plan to be developed consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. Under the proposed DevelopmentAgreement, the final phase of Specific Plan implementation would occur, allowing for buildout of the Specific Plan. The additional square footage of retail space would be developed as part of the Temecula Regional Center, consistent with the approved Specific Plan in the same manner required by the current Development Agreement. The proposed Development Agreement outlines the responsibilities of the developer, Temecula Towne Center Associates, L.P., and the City to complete the Specific Plan process. Project Location The proposed project is located within the 179 acres (excluding roads) Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SPNo. 263) in the City of Temecula bound by Winchester Road to the north, Margarita Road to the east, Overland Road to the south and Ynez Road to the west. Construction Scenario Construciion will consist of the final phase of development and parking structures that would occur .at the T emecula Regional Center within the core retail area, central mall. The exact schedule would depend upon market conditions and availability of materials. "'Construction is envisioned as occurring between early 2007 and late 2009 and is estimated to encompass approximately one year to complete during this period. - During construction, detours and other. traffic management methods would be employed as necessary within the constraints of the surrounding site as needed. No off-site traffic would be . . ( disturbed during construction. . Temecula Regional Cen.ter Initial StudylOB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES. City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Existing Surrounding Land Uses The land uses in the vicinity of the project are high-intensity urban uses. There is a mixture of commercial, office, and residential land uses consisting of multifamily residencies, retail commercial areas, office and industrial development. The proposed project site is within the T emecula Regional Center, known locally as the 'Promenade Mall'. The Temecula Regional Center is completely . disturbed, graded, and/or paved; Interstate 15, a primary north-south transportation corridor, is within one quarter mile of the site. Utility infrastn,lcture (electricity, water, sewer, and natural gas) exists at the project site throughout the Specific Plan area. Winchester Road, Ynez Road, Margarita Road and Overland Drive provide general access to the project vicinity. Other Agencies Whose Approval May Be Required The developer must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for a construction NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit. This permit is granted automatically by submittal of an NOI to the State Board, but is enforced through a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that identifies construction best management practices for the site. The San Diego Regional Board.enforces the SWPPP. The project occurs within the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) area, however, it will not be subjectto review by the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority as it is would be built on a completely disturbed and paved site with no habitat value for biology resources covered under the MSHCP. No other permits have been identified for the development of this site. Procedural Considerations As previously stated, the City of T emecula certified and adopted an Environmental Impact Report for the T emecula Regional Center Specific Plan in 1993 which included construction and operation of a . regional retail center, business and office uses and other mixed uses including residential and hotel development. The EIR evaluated the impact of the development of the uses listed in Table 1. The existing and approved developinent associated with the Specific Plan is listed in Table 2. . The first amendment to the Development Agreement and implementation of the final phase of development for .the T emecula Regional Center may, therefore, be considered a second-tier project being implemented under the existing certified EIR. The City must determine whether the proposed project results in new significant impacts not evaluated in the certified EIR and must decide what the appropriate CEQA environmental deterniination is to make if it chooses to approve and implement this second4ier project. . . In this case, the Temecula Regional Center EIR describes the whole project in terms of objectives . and facililiesand evaluates the cumulative impact of implementing the total project overtime with all its elements. Under this, implementation of specific project components can be reviewed in the context of the certified E1R findings. In this instance, the specific project being .considered by the City at this time is the extension of the approved Development Agreement for an additional three years and 90nstruction of the final phase of the T emecula Mall as provided for in the T emecula Temecula Regional Center Initial Study1083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Regional Center certified EIR. Where activities or facilities being implemented for this project fall within the scope of impacts identified in the certified EIR, the CEQA review process for this facility can be minimized through reliance on the certified EIR to determine whether the potential impacts from project implementation were sufficiently evaluated in the original EIR to fully address significant impacts. The Temecula Regional Center EIR provides a baseline and cumulative environmental evaluation and determination for all the activities required to support the construction and full development and occupancy of the Promenade Mall and the surrounding uses within the Specific Plan. The City can rely upon the certified EIR and review the proposed project for consistency with the project evaluated in the EIR, which allows 'tiering' of any future environmental review as provided in Sections 15152 and 15385 of the State CEQA Guidelines, if subsequent environmental review is required (Section 15162, CEQA GUidelines). Existing conditions used to make impact forecasts in this Initial Study are not necessarily assumed to be the same as those ili the EIR, as the project site for the final phase of development is now within the existing regional center. Analysis presented in .this Initial Study will use a combination of existing conditions used in theElR and existing today, depending on the most appropriate baseline for a conservative analysis. Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines states: (a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless that lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions ofthe previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of tbe previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or . (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was- certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (Aj The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous E1R or Negative Declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; . Mitigation measures or altematives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternatives; or . (C) . Temecula Regional Center Inltial Study1083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES. City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY (D) Mitigation measures or altematives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR wouldsubstantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the. project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. Section 15163 requires a supplement to an EIR in the following circumstances: (a) The Lead or Responsible Agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR if; . (1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and (2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed situation. The City of T emecula was the. Lead Agency for the certified EIR. Thus, in this case the City, acting as the CEQA Lead Agency for development of Specific Plan 263 - T emecula Regional Center, can . rely upon the EIR certified in 1993. Determining consistency with the certified EI R encompasses two tests. The first test entails a reevaluation of the plans for the implementation of the proposed project, as described in detail above,with all ofthe environmental issues addressed in the EIR. An analysis of each of the environmental issues is presented in this Initial Study which compares the proposed effects from constructing and operating the proposed project with the facts and findings of the EIR. To facilitate this process, the City hereby incorporates the certified ErR for the 'Temecula Regional Center' as part of this Initial Study. As is permitted by Section 15150 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the EIR is incorporated by reference into this Initial Study. The required summaries of the pertinent data for all issues are provided in the Initial Study evaluation which follows. Copies of the EIR are available at the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 The s~cond test that may be used to determine whether a second-tier project falls within the scope of an-EIR is to determine whether new circumstances or reassessment of previously identified impacts may result in new significant impacts. As the text in Sections 15162(a) indicates "no . .subsequentEIR shall be prepared for that project unless that lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (Paraphrases of the . State CEQA Guidelines follow). 1. Substantial changes in the project that may cause new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously.identified significant effects; 2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken and which may result in new significant environmental effects or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or 3. New information of substantial importance shows the project will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed. (See specific project description). These tests will be applied to the proposed project and a determination made regarding the appropriate CEQA procedure to implementforthe proposed project. To comply with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, this Initial Study is being prepared to determine if environmental impacts of the Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/()83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY proposed project were encompassed by the impact analyses contained in the EIR prepared for the T emecula Regional Center. Based on the evaluation provided in this Initial Study, the City will make one of the following environmental determinations to comply with CEOA for this project: · The proposed project's environmental effects were encompassed by the environmental evaluation in the EIR. No new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects beyond those evaluated and mitigated in the EIR will result from implementing this project. No further environmental revieW or determination is required. · The project and associated impacts fall within the scope of impacts identified for the entire Specific F>"lan. However, due to more detailed, project-specific information not available at the time the EIR was prepared, impacts and mitigation not addressed in that document are identified in the Initial Study. Adequate measures; however, are provided in the Initial Study to mitigate potential impacts to a level of less than significant and a Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEOA determination. · The project requires some minor changes and/or additions to clarify impacts under current conditions but none of the current conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred. Under this circumstance, an Addendum to . a previously certified EIR can be prepared and adopted. · The Initial Study identifies potential impacts that fall outside the impact forecast in the EIR and since such impact(s) cannot be mitigated below a less than significant level , a subsequent EIR must be prepared. The Initial Study EnvironmentalChecklist Form follows. Temecufa Regional Center Initial StudylOB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City ofTemecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact' or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated', as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Land Use & Planning Public Services Water Aesthetics Utilities & Service Systems Population & Housing Transportation/Circulalion Mandatory Findings of Significance Biological Resources Energy & Mineral Resources Cultural Resources Geophysical Hazards Noise Recreation Air Quality IV. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on. the environment, there. will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measure described on an attached sheet has been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. L I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An Addendum will be adopted by the City as the appropriate CEQA environmental determination for this project. BY: Date: f. ~-O ~ 'I:l/,tz..e c~. Title Temecula Regional Center Initial Studyl063106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources the City cites in the parentheses fol/owing each question. A 'No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A 'No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). A 'No Impact' answer does not require a source listing if it is clearly apparent by a reasonable person that the project does not affect a particular issue (e.g. the construction of infrastructure will not impact parking capacity). The source reference in the parentheses would be 'not applicable' or (N/A). . Issues (and $upporting Information Sources): Potentially Significant ,,,,,act Potentially Significant Unless Mlllgatad less than Significant No Ifll)act Impact Would the proposal: Insufficient parking capacity? (N/A) y 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. . . 3) 'Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if an effect is significant or potentially significant, or if the Planning Department staff lacks information to make a finding of insignificance. If there are one or more 'Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIRis req'uired. 4) 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated' applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effectfrom 'Pot/ilntially Significant Impact' to a 'Less than Significant Impact'. The Planning Department must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17, "Earlier Analyses,' may be cross-referenced). 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlierEIR or negative deClaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discuss/ild in Section 18at the end of the checklist. 6) A reference list of information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances) has been established. The source list is attached to the back of the checklist and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the impact assessment discussion. See sample question below. . Issues (and Supporting Information Soun:es):. Potentially Significant ,,,,,act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less-than Significant No Impact Impact , Would the proposal result in potential impacts involving: Landslides or mudslides? (1, 7) Temacula Regional Center Initial Study/OB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES 1. City of Temecula General Plan Update: a. Land Use Element b. Circulation Element c. Housing Element d. Open Space/Conservation Element e. Growth ManagemenVPublic Facilities Element 1. Public Safety Element g. Air Quality Element h. Community Design Element i.. Economic Development Element T&B Planning Consultants, Specific PlanlEIR, Temecula Regional Center (Specific Plan 263), 1993/1994. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map: Murrieta. 7.5' Quadrangle. Soil Survey - Western Riverside Area California (1971) Congestion Management Plan (RCTC) Growth Management Plan (WRCOG) Other: South Coast Air Qualitv Manaaeinent District; ACEQA Air Quality Handbook@, 1993 Other: Southern California Association of Governments 'Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide', 1997 . California Energy Commission, 'Fuels', July 1999 Riverside County Flood Control District 'Supplement A to the Riverside County Drainaae Area Manaaement Plans. and Attachment to Supplement A'. 1996 11. Other: San Dieao ReaionalWater Qualitv Control Board Water Qualitv Control Plan (Basin Plan) 1997. California Enerav Commission 'ELECTRICITY Report'. November 1997 Development Agreement By And Between The City of Temecula, Forest City Development California, Inc., A California Corporation, And LGA-7, Inc., An Illinois Corporation, December 1996. 14. . Other: Final EIR, TE;lmecula General Plan Update, March 2005. 15. Other: First Amendment to Development Agreement, By And Between The City of Temecula and Temecula Towne Associates, L.P., September 2006. 16. Other: Wilbur Smith Associates, T 6mecula Regional Center Traffic Study Update, January 1997. 17. Other: Wilbur Smith Associates, Temecula Regional Center Traffic Study Update, City Planning Questions Concerning Consistency With The Specific Plan EIR Traffic Study Findings, May 1997. Other: Wilbur Smith Associates, Costco Relocation Traffic Study, October 1999. Other: Wilbur Smith Associates, Consistency LE;ltter for Planned Promenade Mall Expansion, May 2001. 20. Other: Resolution No. 93-57 ofthe CityofTemecula, certifying the EIR and approval of the mitigation monitoring plan for SP 263 by the City of T emecula, July 1993. City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY (Attached source list explains that 1 is the General Plan, and 7 is a USGS topo map. This answer would probably not need further explanation.) V. IMPACT ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST REFERENCES KEY INFORMATION SOURCES 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Other: 1 O.Other: , 12. 13. Other: Other: 18. 19. Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylOB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY VI. IMPACT ASSESSMENt CHECKLIST & DISCUSSION A brief explanation is required for all answers except 'No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources cited in the parentheses following each question. Issues (and Supporting Infol1Tl3.tion Sources): Potentially Significant Impoet Potentially Significant . Unless Mitigated Less than Signlficant No Impact Impact 1. LAND USE & PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) . Conflict with general plan designation or zoning? (la, 2,15) y b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdictions over the project? (1, 2, 5, 6, 8,10, 11) Y c) Affect agricultural resources or operations? (la, 1d, 2) Y. d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? (1, 2, 14) e) Be compatible with existing land use in the vicinity? (1, 2, 14) Y Y Substantiation: The general impacts to land use and planning of the Temecula Regional Center, of which the proposed project is a component, are forecast on pages V-l to V-ll and V -70 to V -76 and throughotll the T emecula Regional Center EIR. Land use impacts, both direct and indirect, were identified as being less than significant, with one exception, from implementing the proposed regional center. The EIR concluded thatthe utilization of this site would result in the loss of approximately 201.3 acres of pasture crops and dryland grains and lands designated as 'Local Important farmland' and Prime Farmland. This was identified as an unavoidable, significant adverse land use impact of constructing and operating the T emecula Regional Center (TRC). 1 a.. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed development agreement and implementation of the final phase olthe approved specific plan for the T emecula . Regional Center would not conflict with the general plan designation or specific plan zoning. Tlw final . phase of development of the Temecula Regional Center is part of the implementation of the.approved. specific plan for the site and General Plan designation for commercial development. The proposed. . project would develop the final phase of the specific plan in accordance with policies contained in the specific plan and meet all other city requirements. ..1 b. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project would be required to abide with the applicable environmental plans and policies of other agencies with regulatory authority over environmental resources.. These agencies include the Air Quality ManagementDistrict, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the State Water Resources Coritrol Board. These issues were addressed in the appropriate subcnapters of the EIR. The project must also prepare and submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resources Control Board and prepare a Storm Water Pollution. Prevention Plan (SWPPP). . Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylOB3106 TOM DODSON .& ASSOCIATES. City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY In general. all projects in western Riverside County are subject to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). However, the Temecula Regional Center site is completely disturbed. paved, or in the process of development and contains no resources protected under the MSHCP. . The site is not within the jurisdiction of the Airport Land Use Commission as it is not within the airport influence area of any airport. 1 c. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than Characterized in the TRC EIR. Prior to development of the regional center, the site was used for dry-land farming and pasture and was considered prime farmland and local important farmland. Therefore, the EIR considered development of the site potentially . significant to agricultural resources. The site is now completely disturbed with most of the site pa",ed for parking lots or covered with structures. As such, it is no longer considered valuable agricultural property or classified as important farm land by any local or state entity. Therefore, the development of the firial phase of the Temecula Regional Center would not be considered significant to agriculture. 1 d. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project is in the west-central part of the City. Surrounding uses include varying densities of residential uses, commercial uses, industrial and office uses, and the 1-15 freeway. The proposed project is within the approved specific plan and would complete the implementation of the specific plan. The project would not divide an established community. It would implement part of the General Plan land use element and provide and opportunity for the City to collect more sales tax to support benefits for the community at large. The proposed project has no potential to cause a significant physical division in the existing community. 1 e. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The.project site is within an area developed with amix of uses. including the regional shopping facilities and high density residential uses and industrial uses. The development agreement and development proposed would complete the implementation of land uses envisioned by the specific plan approved for the site. As a result, utilization of the site would be optimized and would support the existing and proposed land uses in the project area. Thus, it will not be incompatible with the existing land uses. . The final phase of development ofthe Temecula Regional Center would be completed during operation of the remaining portions of the Regional Center and some disturbance of on-site traffic would occur. However, no long-term land use incompatibility with surrounding uses would result from project implementation. Traffic impacts on the surrounding area during construction would be reduced through implementation of a traffic management plan approved by the City. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of . development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, land use and planning issues, .related specifically to the proposed development agreement and buildout of the final phase of theT emecula Regional Center, remain consistent with the approved specific plan and will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation greater than those anticipated by the TRC Final EIR. All land use and planning issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. No land use mitigation is required fonhis project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. T~mecula Regional Center lnitfal Study/083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentlally Significant ,,,'''''' Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated less than SignifiCant No lf1llact IrT{Iact 2. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? (1, 2, 14,15) b) Police protection? (1,2,14,15) y y c) Schools? (1,14) y d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (1,2,14,15) y e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (1,2,.14,15) y f) Other governmental services? (1,14) y Substantiation: . The general impacts related to public services from development of the project as part of implementation of the General Plan are forecast on pages V-93 through V-151 of the certified Temecula Regional Center EIR (lRC EIR). The analysis of the regional center, including the proposed final development phase, concluded that the project would not result in significant adverse.impactsto any public services. However, the cumulative impacts would be significant. The City of Temecula provides certain public services to the City's residents thatare an essential component of the area's transition to a modern urban/suburban community. The services provided by or contracted by the City include: fire protection, law enforcement services (pOlice protection), recreation, and library services. Other services are provided by special districts, or private service entities. These include: schools and medical services. Many of these services are self-supporting, i.e., users of the service pay a direct fee to a commercial operator. Others are funded collectively by the community residents through taxes or payment of Development Impact Fees. '2a. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. . The project site is served by the Riverside County Fire Department and California Department of Forestry on a contract basis with the \ City. . Five fire stations serve the T emecula area and are staffed by both paid and volunteer personnel. The closest station to respond to emergencies at the project site is the station located at 27415 Enterprise Circle West with back-up from the station at 28330 Mercedes Street. These stations are within a five minute response time of the project site. This project site has been generally included in the City Fire Protection Master Plan's. facility improvements and staffing increases for Temecula. It is not expected that any new physicalfacilities for fire protection will be required to serve the project. lhe project site is not within a Wildland Fire Protection Area, i.e., an identified special hazard area that requires additional services be available from the California Department of Forestry. Mitigation was required to address emergency management plans for the Temecula Regional Center in the EIR. These resulted in a less than significant impactin this area. Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City ofT emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY The proposed extension of time and completion of the final phase of the mall is not forecast to cause significant adverse impacts to fire protection services and no additional mitigation is required beyond the standard City code and design requirements. 2b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project would be required to meet the City of Temecula General Plan policies and design standards that optimize safety. The proposed project would incorporate these elements. The site design will be examined by the City to ensure compliance with City circulation policies in the specific plan. Measures included to mitigate traffic impacts in the EIR, would also improve safety and may decrease demand for police services in res'ponse to local traffic accidents. The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for police services. The Sheriff's 'Department has a Southwest Station located at 30755-A Auld Road near the French Valley Airport. A store-front station is located within the Temecuia Regional Center at the Promenade Mall. The project site also has other law enforcement services available from the California Highway Patrol. The California Highway Patrol has jurisdiction along the Interstate 15 freeway. ' Mitigation was identified in the EIR to reduce impacts in this area. Theproposed project is not forecast to cause significant adverse impacts to police services and no additional mitigation is required for this ' project. ' 2c. Imoacts Remain the Same or less than Characterized in the TRC EIR. The Temecula Unified School District provides public elementary, junior hign and high school education for the area surr04nding the project .area. The proposed project would create no demand for school capacity as the proposed development would be retail commercial development. No housing is proposed as part of the final phase of development. No school facilities would be displaced. No mitigation would be required and no adverse impact to school facilities is forecast to result from implementing the proposed project. 2d. Imoacts Remain the Same or less than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. There are no existing parks 'close to the project site. Extensive regional park and recreation facilities are located within the area. These include Lake Elsinore, Lake Perris and Lake Skinner, the latter being the closest. These facilities offer camping, fishing, biking, picnicking, swimming and other related outdoor recreation activities. Additional open space recreation activities are located on the Santa Rosa Plateau at the nature park operated for hiking and educational purposes. The proposed project would not place any demand on existing local or regional park and recreation , facilities as no housing is proposed as part of the, final phase of the specilic plan implementation. It would also not displace any existing or known proposed recreational facilities. No mitigation is required. 2e. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project would result in the buildout of an approved specific plan. The City has funding sources in place to maintain roadways and allocates maintenance funds on an annual basis from ils general fund. The proposed project wouldpay , for, and/or provide public road improvements and maintenance of roadways through sales taxes generated and'provisions of the development agreerrient. The project is forecast to place a less than significant demand on the circulation system maintenance in, the City. 21. Imoacts Remain the Same or less than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Impacts to health services, libraries or otner public services are anticipated to be less than significant as a result of implementing the proposed project. No housing is proposed as part ofthe final phase of development for the specific plan. A commercial development does not result in an increase in population or demand for health services. Therefore, no impact on library operations has been identified such that additional mitigation is required. ' Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylOB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES ( City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY No housing is proposed as part of the final phase of specific plan development. A commercial development does not result in an increase in population or demand for library services. Therefore, no impact on library operations has been identified such that additional mitigation is required. No other impacts to public services are anticipated as a result of project implementation. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, public service issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentiallysignificant adverse impacts from project implementation. All public service issues are forecast to experience less than signiticant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. No additional public service mitigation is required. This finding is consistent with the data contained in theTRC Final EIR. Issues (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): Potentially Significant Impaot Potentially Significant - Unless Mitigated Lessthan . Significant No Impact Impact 3. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or sub[ltantialalterations to the following utilities: a) b) Power or natural gas? (1, 2, 14, 15) y Communication systems? ((1,2,14,15) y c) Sewer or septic tanks? ((1,2,14,15) Solid waste and disposal? ((1,2,14,15) y d) e) y Local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities? ((1,2, 14, 15) Storm water drainage? ((1,2,14,15) y f) y Substantiation: The general impacts related to utilities from development of the project as part of implementation of the Temecula Regional Center Speeitic Plan are forecast on pages V-93 through V-151 olthe certifiedTRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the FEIR concluded that no significant adverse impacts would affect any utilnies. However, cumulative impacts would remain significant. Standard conditions and a few mitigation measures were. identified to address project specific potential adverse impacts that were .identified in the analysis. The proposed projeci may adversely impact utilities in one of two ways: first, during construction exi[lting utility lines may be affected by construction and the lines relocated, either within the existing alignment or along another alignment; and second, over the long-term the project would utilize a particular utility service, such as power consumption for street lights, or may alter an existing utility function, such as the drainage system. This project will cause both of these effects and they are evaluated on a case-by-case basis below. The City of Temecula obtains utility services from a variety of providers, ranging from public utilities (electricity, natural gas and telephone) and public entities providing water and sewer service, to the City and County which Temecula Regional Center Initial Study!083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY '. provide for flood control and solid waste disposal services. These utility services are similar to the public service systems because they have limited capacity which must be compared to the demand proposed by a new project. As in the case of some public services, most of the utility service systems are self-supporting, i.e., users of the service pay a direct fee to the operator, which commonly includes a fee or a portion of the fee available to expand the capacity of the utility service system. Thus, for the water and wastewater system, a connection fee provides the capital \0 fund future improvements and capacity expansion to meet future forecast demand, Other than the ongoing storm water drainage management system, none of the utility systems, including solid waste collection and disposal, is funded collectively by the community residents through taxes or payment of Development Impact Fees. (DIF). As discussed below, any disturbance and/or relocation of utility infrastructure would be coordinated with the appropriate utility. . 3a. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Southern California Edison (SCE) is the electricity provider for the proposed project area. Some demand for electricity would be created by the need to supply energy for the proposed bJJildoutof commercial space in the approved specific plan. The project and associated energy needs are part of the impacts analyzed for the buildout scenario in the TRC EIR and General Plan EIR. The electricity demand for this final phase of the project would be considered less than significant. SCE has local distribution lines on site. Potential relocation of fines wilhin the specific plan area is not forecast to cause any additional adverse impacts due to the disturbance related to the proposed project. Southern California Gas is the natural gas provider to the project site.. Demand for natural gas would increase as a result of developing the final phase of specific plan. buildout. Any natural gas . infrastructure located within the project disturbance area would be protected and/or relocated during project implementation. . Based on the overall energy circumstances affecting the proposed project, the energy resources are expected to be on line to serve the energy needs of the region, as already acknowledged by the local suppliers, SCE and The Gas Company. No significant energy impacts are forecast to result trom implementing the proposed project. 3b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Communication systems including telephone, cable and high-speed internet lines, are available in the vicinity of the project area and would be used as part of project implementation. Any lines within the project disturbance area would remain in place, be removed and relocated outside the project area, or removed and placed at a depth that would protect them within the project area. In any case, the potential relocation is not forecast to cause any significant adverse impacts. 3c. . Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Demand for wastewater services would result from the proposed project. No septic systems would be used to serve this project. Sewer infrastructure is located within the project area and wastewater would be treated at Eastern Municipal Water District=s Temecula Valley Wastewater Reclamation Facility. Any sewer or infrastructure wilhin the project area would be protected or relocated during project implementation. No recycled water lines exist within or near the project area. Wastewater services impacts were analyzed in the FEIR. No . significant changes to buildout wastewater demand would occur as a result of the proposed time extension of the development agreement and construction and operation of the final phase of specific plan. . 3d. Impacts. Remain the Same as CharacterizedJn the TRC EIR. The proposed project will generate. . demand for solid waste service system capaGity during construction and operation. The buildout impacts of the proposed project on solid waste services were analyzed within the TRC EIR and found to be less than significant applYing standard. cOnditions and With mitigation incorporated. Solid waste Temecula"RegiOnaJ Center Initial Studyl083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Cilyof Temecula Temecula Regional Cenler INITIAL STUDY capacity in area landfills, particularly the EI Sobrante Landfill, has been expanded to provide adequate disposal capacity for cumulative demand. EI Sobrante has more than 20 years of capacity available and licensed at this time. Combined with the City=s mandatory source reduction and recycling program and policies and programs for promoting recycling and waste reduction, the proposed project is not forecast to cause a significant adverse impact to the waste disposal system. 3e. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIA. The proposed project is located within the boundaries of Rancho Califomia Water District (RCWD). The prpposed project would require water during general construction activities and during operation. Commercial development would require water for general operations, fire flows (if required), restaurant and other food service uses and landscaping in parking lots and other outside areas. The impacts of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan on water demand were analyzed in the EIA. Mitigation measures were recommended to reduce water impacts of the project such as complying with any requirements to install reclaimed/recycled water infrastructure if applicable and installing water saving fixtures and irrigation systems. With implementation of mitigation measures, impacts to water were considered less than significant. Water lines are available at the site and any relocation of water lines would be coordinated with RCWD. Recycled water may be made available as recycled water lines are extended to new areas near the project site. If available, it can be utilized within the project boundaries. 3f. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Drainage improvements connecting the final phase of the specific plan to the master drainage plan on-site and to the existing region-wide flood control/storm runoff drainage system would be constructed as part of the proposed project and as analyzed in theEIA. Please refer to a detailed discussion of this issue in Section 6, Water. The proposed project would comply with all iRiverside County Conservation and Flood Control, District regulations including provision for no net increase in incremental discharge volumes from the site and for water quality requirements. Note that since the project area being converted for the final phase is already paved, no increase in storm water runoff will result from completing this phase of the project. Onsite runoff will be detained in accordance with Flood Control District requirements. The project would also have to meet the City requirements. The project will not increase the volume of flows downstream of the project ,and no significant project specific or cumulative significant adverse impact is forecast fOr the storm water drainage system if the project is implemented as proposed. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension ofthe existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemenied. Based on the analysis presented above utility issues related specifically to the proposed project and incorporation of mitigation in the EIR, there would be no potentially significant 'adverse impacts from project implementation All utility issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIA. Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/063106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): PotemlaJly Significant ,,,,,act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant No Irrpact Impact 4. POPULATION & HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local population projections? (1,2,14) b) Induce substantial growth in an area either directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? (1,2,14) . y y c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable housing? (1, 2, 14) Substantiation: y The general and indirect impacts related to population and housing is forecast on pages V -9 to V -11 and V- 152 to V-154 and throughout the certified Temecula Regional Center EIR. 4a. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project is the time extension of a development agreement and the subsequent completion of the final phase of specific plan development and will riot provide housing or lead to a signfficant increase in population or housing. This project has no potential to cause population growth that would exceed official regional or local population projections. The specific plan does allow for some residential uses, but these uses will not be implemented on the project site. Implementation of the proposed action will enhance the jobs/housing balance for the City by increasing the total square footage of development within the specffic plan area closer to the buildout square footage identified in Tables 1 and 2 in this document. However, the proposed development only includes retail commercial uses at this time. 4b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project does not provide housing. The site.is Within the current developed area in the City and surrounding community. It will . complete the construction of the specific plan previously approved and was included in the T emecula General Plan Update and General Plan EIR in addition to being analyzed in the TRC EIR. As such, the proposed project is considered to be consistent with the General Plan growth projections. No significant extension of utilities and services will be required as part of the project. Existing utilities located on site may be relocated as part of the project to accommodate the final phase of development. The needs of existing and projected population for retail commercial services as anticipated by the General Plan will be partially fulfilled by completing the final phase ofthe Temecula Regional Center. As it serves existing and planned needs, the proposed project has no possibility of inducing substantial growth within the City or project area in general.' 4c. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. . There are no residences within the proposed project site that would be demolished as. part ofthe construction of the final phase of the specific plan. The project site is an existing shopping center with no residential uses. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, population and housing issues .related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All population and housing issues are forecast to experience less than significant Temecula Regional Center Initiaf Study/0B3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIAtES . City of Temecula _ Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY impacts if the development agreement time extension is approved and implemented. No population and housing mitigation is required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. . Potentfally Potentially Less than SIgnificant Significant Significant No Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Impact Unless Mitigated Impact Impact 5. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? y (1,2,14) b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. y sharp curves or dangerous intersections), incompatible uses (e.g. farm eqUipment) or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? . (1,2) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to y nearby uses? (2) d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? y (2) e) . Conflicts with adopted policies supporting y alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (1,2, 14) f) Air or rail traffic impacts? (1,2) y Substantiation: The general impacts related to transportation/circulation issues from development of the project as part of implementation of the Regional Center are forecast on pages V-93 through V-117 of the certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). Extensive mitigation measures were identified to reduce circulation impacts. The analysis concluded that with mitigation incorporated, no potentially significant impacts would occur to the circulation system as.a result of the specific plan implementation. However, cumulative impacts to circulation would be potentially significant and could not be mitigated to a less than significant level. Traffic impacts from buildout of the General Plan; which include the anticipated buildout of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, are also evaluated in the recent General Plan FEI8. Several intersections and freeway ramps are .forecast to operate at less than acceptable .Ievels of service, even with all feasible mitigation incorporated as a result of General Plan implementation. The proposed project being considered in this Initial Study is a proposed Development Agreement Amendment t6 extend the. term of the Temecula Regional Center Development Agreement an additional three years to provide for the future development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the Temecula RegionalGenter Specific Plan. Sa. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The City of Temecula has identified the minimum level of service (LOS) as '0' for City intersections not adjacent to the interstate freeways and LOS 'E' for intersections and ramps adjacent totreeways. As described above, the proposed project. Temecula Regional Center Initial Studyl083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City ofTemecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY will generate traffic. However, the traffic generated by the final phase of Specific Plan development was anticipated by the TRC EIR and mitigation measures were included in the EIR to reduce traffic impacts to less than significant levels. However, the TRC EIR also identifies potentially significant cumulative impacts to the city circulation system due to general growth in the area that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. The General Plan EIR also identifies cumulative impacts to circulation that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. No new or greater impacts to circulation will result from project implementation that were not analyzed in the TRC EIR and recently validated in the General Plan EIR. 5b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. New road improvements were proposed and implemented as part of the first phases of Regional Center development. Any design proposed for road improvements or parking facUities will meet the City's design standards that are deemed to be sUfficient so as to create no traffic flow hazards. Based on the approved Specific Plan and EIR the proposed project is not forecast to pose significant ha;tards to pedestrians, bicyclists, or motor vehicles. 5c. Impacts Are Identified That Were Not Considered in 'he TRC EIR. During construction adequate emergency access and control must be accomplished by implementing a traffic management plan to ensure safe, albeit, sloWer traffic flow on the adjacent streets and within the Regional Center. The EIR does not analyze this issue area. However, the Cny requires a traffic management plan for all development as a standard condition. Therefore no mitigation is required to ensure this issue area remains less than significant because it will be applied to the final phase of development as a standard condition of approval. . . The Specific Plan and City design standards include features to ensure that hazards to safety from design features (e.g. sharp curves or dangerous intersections), incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment) or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists do not occur. Implementation of these standards is sufficient to ensure that emergency access constraints and hazards created by construction activities are controlled to a less than significant impact level. 5d. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The existing specific plan and City of Temecula zoning ordin<lnce include requirements for adequate parking capacity. With buildout of the SpeCific Plan, parking capacity would be increased if necessary using one or more parking structure(s). Therefore, there would be no adverse impact to parking capacity as a result of this project. 5e. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The design of the proposed project would not be in conflict with policies supporting alternative transportation. Mitigation measures are included in the EIR to encourage alternative modes of transportation, including publiC transportation, as they have the potential to ease general traffic congestion in the area. 51. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The project does not affect any rail or water circulation systems 'as none exists in the project area. the project is not located within the airport influence area of French Valley Airport or any other airport. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and incorporation of mitigation measures in the EIR, transportation/circulation issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse . impacts from project implementation. All traffic flow issues related to the proposed project are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. , ./ Temecula Regional Center Initial Study1083106 TOM DODSON 8. ASSOCIATES City of T emecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially Sfgnlflcant '_ct Potentially Slgnlllcanl Unless MJUgated Less than Significant No Impact Impact 6. WATER. Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns. or the rate and amount of surface runoff? (1, 2, 14) y b) j:xposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding and inundation? (1,2,14) c) Discharge into surface waters, or in other alteration of surface water quality, (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? (1,2,14) y y d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any water body? (1,2,14) y e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements? (1,2,14) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? (1,2,14) '. g) Altered direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (1,2,14) h) Impacts to ground water quality? (1,2,14) y y y y Substantiation: The general impacts related to water issues from development of the project as part of implementation of the SpeCific Plan are forecast on.pages V-26 to V-30, V-56 to V-58, and V-118 to V-123 o.flhe certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). No significant adverse impacts to the area drainage system and water quality would result from . the proposed project implementation. However, cumulative impacts to regional flood facilities were. considered potentially significant Several mitigation measures were identified to address the project site hydrology and water quality impacts, including measures. to control future runoff and to install required. . drainage system improvements for the project. . 6a,d &e. lmoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Implementation of the Specific Plan was anticipated to result in changes to absorption rates and the amount of runoff from the project site. An engineering report(See Volume II o.flhe SPJEIR), and drainage study were used to analyze impacts of . runoff from the implementation of ilie Specific Plan in the certified EIR. The project site is presently . developed with impervious surfaces, asphalt and concrete. Therefore, subsequent construction of the final phase of Specific Plan implementation would not result in an increase in impervious surfaces. The proposed project has been designed to accommodate the storm water flows and these flows will be directed to on-site .drainage facilities. The storm runoff will be discharged into the existing off-site . Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY system of man-made channels at a comparable volume to the existing volume of runoff. The flows will be defivered to the regional drainage system, which includes soft-bottom channels, such as Murrieta Creek, that facilitate water recharge into the ground water basins. With implementation of mitigation listed in the EIR, the proposed project would not result in significant adverse changes in the local existing drainage pattern and absorption rates within the area. No additional mitigation beyond those measures already identified in the EIR is required. 6b. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Based on a review of pertinent FEMA and FIRM maps for the project area, the proposed project is located partially within a 1 OO-year flood hazard zone and partially within the inundation area for the Lake Skinner Dam. Grading and drainage facilities on the site have reduced the flood plain impact to less than significant. Thus, the implementation of the final phase of the Specific Plan will not result in an exposure of new facilities to.signfficantflood hazards. As described in the analysis of 6.a above, the proposed project will be required to convey storm water flows to regional drainage systems in a manner that would ensure that no significant flood hazards will occur downstream. Potential impacts for this issue would be less than significant based on the lack of existing flood hazard and the implementation of mitigation measures identified in the EIR. Further, the project site is not subject to significant flood hazards from seiche, or tsunami. 6c. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project encompasses activities that would typically generate some urban non-point source pollution. Paved roadways and parking lots generally accumulate urban non-point pollutants (particles, trash, oil, etc.) This project would discharge into the regional system that flows into Murrieta Creek and eventually the Santa Margarita River. Varying amounts of urban pollutants such particles and petroleum products (motor oil, antifreeze, etc.) could be introduced into downstream waters from the proposed roadways. However, the proposed project is not anticipated to generate discharges that would require pollution controls beyond those already required by the City and was forecast by the General Plan for this area improvement. The County and cities have adopted stringent best management practices designed to control discharge of pollution that could result in a significant adverse impact to surface water quality. The primary . document containing the guidelines for the County=s Municipal Stormwater Management Program is titled: 'Riverside County Drainage Area Management Plan, Santa Ana and Santa Margarita Regions' (2005). Specific appendices define best management practices (BMPs) that when implemented, can ensure thatneither significant erosion and sedimentation, nor other water quality degrading impacts will occur as a result of developing the project. Since BMPs are mandatory for the project to comply. with established pollutant discharge requirements during both construction (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, SWPPP) and over the long-tllrm (Water QUality Management Plan, WQMP). no additional mitigation is required to ensure this issue is appropriately addressed. Compliance will be ensured through fulfilling the requirements of the SWPPP and WQMP, which can be monitored by both the City and the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. 6f-h. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR; The project is in an area where depth to ground \yater has been measured from 20 to 45 feet below the surface depending on seasonal precipitation and otmer factors. However, the potential to intercept ground water during grading and construction is essentially zero. Any grading would associated with the proposed project would be less than 20 feet below the surface. The proposed project is not subject to the requirements of Senate Bills 221 and 610 because the final phase of development improvements do not have a water demand .' . equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required for a 500 dwelling unit project (approximately 252 acre ft. per year). .. As discussed in response 6c, surface water quality impacts would be bE;!low a level of significancewith implementation of standard conditions. Therefore, ground water quality impacts would also be less than significant becayse the proposed project will not deliver significantly contaminated water to the ground Temecula Regional Center InitIal StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY water aquifer through percolation. The impacts to rate and direction of flow of ground water would also not experience a significant adverse impact because no pumping is proposed in association with the proposed project on the project site. No significant adverse impacts to ground water are forecast to occur as a result of implementing the proposed project. . Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which ihe final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the water mitigation measures in the EIR, water issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Based on the analysis presented above, water issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All water issues are forecast to experience less than signnicant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. New requirements for water quality protection have been imposed since this project was approved, but the City mandates that best management practices be imposed to control construction and long-term potential water quality degrading pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. Because this is a mandatory requirement, no new mitigation needs' to be imposed to achieve a less than significant impact on water quality issues. No new water mitigation measures are required for this roadway project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Potentially Potenllally Less than Significant Slgnifioant Significant No -Issues (and SuppoTung Informa:tion Sources): .l~act Unless Mitigated . IrTpa9l Imp'" 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or y their habitats (including, but not limited to plants, fish, insects, animals, and birds)? (1,2,14,15) b) Locally designated species and/or natural y communities (e.g. heritage trees, oak forests, etc.)? (1,2,14,15)) c) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and y vernal pools)? (1,2.,14, 15) d) Wildlife dispersal ormigration corridors, y (including, but not limited to Murrieta Creek, Warm Springs Creek and Cole Creek)? . (1,2,14,15) Substantiation: The general impacts related to biological resources from development of the project as part of implementation of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan are forecast on pagesV-77 thr9ugh V-83 of the certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). Several general mitigation measures were identified to address the project site biology resource impacts. The EIR concludec;lthat no signnicant resources were present on the site and that no adverse impacts to ihe onsite biological resource issues would result from the implementation of the Specific . Temecula Reclional Center Initial Study/0B3106 . . TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY . Plan. However, the incremental loss of biotic resources (non-native grassland/open space previously used for farming) would contribute to significant region-wide cumulative impacts to biological resources Two studies were conducted to eval.uate biological resources on the Specific Plan site which includes the proposed project. The summaries of the studies and technical reports are included in the certified EIR for the TRC and are incorporated by reference into this analysis. Mitigation w,as included in the EIR to reduce the impacts associated with the development of the site to a less than significant level. The EIR concluded that with this mitigation, no significant, unavoidable impacts to biOlogical resources would occur as a result of development of the site. However, cumulative impacts would remain significant. The proposed project would result in buildout of the Specific Plan as anticipated in the EIR at the same site location. No additional biological impacts would occur from project implementation than were analyzed in the TRC EIA. Because they are where the final phase will be developed has already been converted to urban uses, the proposed . project does not need to incorporate the mnigation measures listed in the EIR in the biological resources section. 7a. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the IRC EIA. The vegetation on the .site was categorized as introduced, or non-native, grassland and the site used as foraging habitat for raptors. However, the site is currently completely disturbed and/or developed with. a major shopping center and other urban uses and paved for parking. No biOlogical resources remain on-site with the exception of some landscaping that has extremely limited value for use by native wildlife. The proposed project would not disturb or destroy any biological resou(ces. . There is no biue-Iine stream on site and drainage on-site has been altered through the implementation . of earlier phases of the Specific Plan as anticipated by the TRC EIR. 7b. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the IRC EIA. The EIR found no species of concern occurring within the proposed project or oaks or other plant species of concern within the project site. The Stephens Kangaroo Rat was found nearby, but not on the project site. Raptors used the site for foraging, but the loss of foraging habitat at this particulilr site alone was not considered a significant impact. The site is now completely disturbed and/or developed with a shopping center and associated uses. Development of the final phase of the SpeCific Plan will have a less than significant impact in this area. . . 7c. lmoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIA. No riparian habitat, vernal pools., wetlands, or jurisdictional waters were found on sne. The site was used for dryland farming and was highly disturbed at the time of the EIR analysis. Since the site is fully developed with urban uses, no potential exists to adversely impact any wetlands. 7d.. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIA. The project site is completely disturbed and developed for human use., It is also surrounded by other urban uses and isolated from habitat areas making it generally unsuitable as a wildlife movement corridor. The project site is not located within wildlife dispersal or migration/movement corridor and the lack of habitat resources indicate that the proposed project does not serve as a movement corridor. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the biology .. mitigation measures in the EIR, biology resource .issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation; Based on the analysis presented above, biology issues related specifically to the final phase of SpeCific Plan development will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All biology resource issues are forecast to experience less than .. . Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASS.OCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY significant impacts though cumulative impacts from area-wide development remain significant. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potenllally Signlflcant '''''"'' PotentIally Significant Unless Mitigated Lesslhan SignIfIcant No Impact Impact 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? (1, 2, 14) y b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner? (1, 2,14 ) y Substantiation: The general impacts related to energy resources issues fram development of the project as part of implementatian of the Temecula Regional Center are farecast on pages V-84 through V-85 and V-133 thraugh V-137 of the certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). Several. standard canditions were identified to. address the project site energy impacts. The analysis of the project concluded that no significant adverse impacts to . energy resources would result from the proposed project implementatian. However, cumulative impacts to energy resaurces from general area-wide growth were considered potentially significant. 8a. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The project would not canflict with any known energy or non-renewable resource conservation plans. The proposed project is part af the implementation of an approved Specific Plan. Energy resources were identified in the EIR as being adequate to meet the needs far the Specific Plan buildout. Please refer to Section 3 of this Initial Study for a further discussion of energy suppliers in relation to the proposed project. 8b. linoacts That Were Not Characterized in the TRC EIR. The EIR did not specifically discuss mineral resources impacts of the Temecula Regional Center as the Caunty had found mineral resources impacts to be less than significant in their previaus Environmental Assessment for the City. However, . the construction of the uses allowed by the Specific Plan would use energy and non-renewable resaurces,such as concrete, steel and asphalt. Hawever, the buildout of the final phase afthe Specific Plan would have no greater impact than the buildout of the Specific Plan as a whale and Would be included as contributing part of the impact of the whale project. The use of resaurces to. complete a regional shapping center and provide services to the community as envisioned in the Specitrc Plan and General Plan would not be considered wasteful or inefficient. Therefore, the project would have a less . than significant impact in this area. The site is not located on any known significant mineral resaurce and is not known to have been mined in the past. . Conclusion The proposed project is the extensianof the eXisting development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the'analysis presented abave, energy and mineral resource . issues related specifically to the propased project will nat experience potentially significant adverse impacts ,from project implementation. All energy and mineralresaurce issues areforecasfta experience less than significant impacts if the final phase of Specific Plan canstruction is approved and implemented. No energy ar .. Temecula Regional Center . Initial St~y'1OO3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES .'f Gity of T emecula Temecula Regional Genter INITIAL STUDY mineral resource mitigation is required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Issues (and Supporting I~fonnatlon Sources): Potentially Significant ....act Potenllally Slgnlficant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant No Impact Impact 9. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? y (1,2,14) b) Disturb archaeologic<J,1 resources? y (1,2,14) c) Affect historical resources? (1,2,14) Y d) Have the potential to cause a physical change y which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? (1, 2, 14) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within y . the potential impact area? (1, 2, 14) Substantiation: The. general impacts related to cultural resource issues from development of the project as part of implementation of the Specific Plan are forecast on pages V-89 through V-92 of the certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the project concluded that no significant adverse impacts to cultural resources would result from the TRC del(elopment. Several mitigation measures were identified to address the project site cultural resource impacts. Archaeological and Paleontological Assessments were performed on the site as part of the environmental analysis in the certified EIR for the TRC, These studies are provided as part ofthe EIR, Volume III. 9a.lmoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The paleontological assessment suggests that there is a probability that Pllleontologic resources exist on some portions of the site and that fossil remains and fossil sites could be adversely affected by activities necessary to implement the Specific Plan project. In order to reduce this impact to less than significant, mitigation mellsures (including monitoring) were included in the EIR to be implemented during ground disturbance. The site has since been disturbed and almost completely developed. Implementation of the final phase of construction on the site would not involve grading to a depth where paleontologic resources are likely to . occur. However, application of the existing mitigation measures would ensure the impacts to paleontologic resources remain less than significant. 9b. . Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR, The archaeological assessment concluded that no archaeological resources are likely to exist on the project site. A mitigation measure was included which requires that should in the evenUhat any cultural resources are encountered during grading or construction activities. work shall be hailed or diverted in the immediate area and a qualified archaeologistshall be consulted for evaluation of resources and recommendations. It is unlikely that any cultural resources would be encountered during the final phase of Specific Plan buildout as the site has already been completely disturbed and graded in order to develop previous phases of the project. However, implementation of the included mitigation measure would ensure that impacts in this area remain less than significant. . Temecula Regional Center Initial Study!083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY 9c. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. No significant historical resources were found on site prior to development. The site had been used as a farm and some remnants of structures were found on site but were not considered significant resources. No significant adverse historical impacts are forecast to result from implementing the proposed project within the Specific Plan site. The re are no known historical resources on the site and the site has already been completely disturbed and graded as part of the implementation of earlier phases of the Specific Plan. . 9d. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project site.is not known.to have any unique ethnic cultural values. No significant or unique ethnic cultural values were identified . during the paleontological or archaeological studies. Thus, no potential exists to cause adverse impacts to unique ethnic cultural values. . . ge. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. No significant ethnic, religious, or sacred resources are known to exist on site. The site is used primarily as a shopping mall with other accessory retail, restaurant and office uses. No adverse impact can occur from implementing the proposed project. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the cultural r!lsource mitigation measures in the EIR, cultural resource issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Based on the analysis presented above, cultural resource issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All cultural resource issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. No new cultural resource mitigation measures are required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. lssuas (and Supporting Infonnation Sources): Potentially SlgnUicant '''''''' Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated '-"'than Significant No ll11lact ll11lact 10. RECREATION, Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities? . (1,2,14) y b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? (1,2,14) . y Substantiation: The general impacts related to recreation from development of the project as part of implementation of the Temecula Regional Center SpeCific Plan are forecast on pages V- 131 through V-312 of the certified TRC . Final EIR (FEIR).Please refer to the discussion regarding parks and recreation in Section 2 ofthis document. The analysis of the Specific Plan, including the final phase, concluded that 110 significant adverse impacts to recreational resources would result from the proposed projectimplementation. 10a. Impacts Remain the Same or Less Than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project is a commercial development and does not include housing. Therefore, no demand for recreation would be generated frOm project implementation. The Specific Plan does allow residential uses. However, these have not been developed within the SpeCific Plan area and are not being considered at this time. Therefore, the impacts of SpeCific Plan buildout in this issue area are less than what was Temecula Regional Center. InWal StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY forecast at the time of Specific Plan EIR certification and approval. No demand for recreation or parks would result from the implementation of the proposed project. 10b. Impacts Remain the Same or Less than as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project would not develop or impact any areas planned for recreational uses. The proposed project site is designated and zoned for commercial, office and related use. No adverse impact to any existing . recreation opportunities are forecast to occur if the proposed project is implemented. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, recreation issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Recreation issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Issues (and SUpporting Infolm3.t1on Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant - Unless MItigated less than Significant No IlJlPacl Impact 11. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: . a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? (1,2,14) y b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic .effect? (1,2,14) c) Create light or glare? (1, 2, 14) y y Substantiation: The general impacts related to aesthetic issues from development of the project as part of implementation of .the Specific Plan are forecast on pages V-86 through V-88, V-148 through V- 149, and olthe certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the Specific Plan, including the final phase, concluded that no significant . adverse impacts to aesthetic values would result from the proposed project implementation. Several mitigation measures were identified to address the project site aesthetic impacts related to light and glare. 11 a. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project is set in the west- central area of Temecula which has been characterized by rolling hills with views of surrounding hillsides and larger mountains in all directions. The area has become urbanized and is developed with a mix of uses but dominated by commercial uses. The proposed project is adjacent to Highway 79, which is designated a 'Eligible County Scenic Highway'. The EIR determined that the project would have no significant adverse aesthetic impacts on this highway. .. The proposed project, would not impact undeveloped hillsides and ridgelines would still be visible in the area after the projeot site is developed. The sne is adjacent to 1-15, but due to the level of development in the project area; the visual selting is not considered a significant scenic resourCe. Adverse aesthetic impacts to scenic resources from development of the. site would be .Iess than significant with implementation of existing City Design Standards and Design Guidelines in the SpeCific Plan. These standards include design criteria that enhance the aesthetics of a project and require design and site layout that are compatible with .the surrounding area. The project will be required to meet ~he City public works standards and any roadway improvements would be improved to General Plan and Specific Plan specifications. , l'emecula Regional Center InfUa! StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY 11 b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project would extend the timeline of a Development Agreement to provide for the development of the final phase of a Specific Plan. The final phase would complete the core area of an existing regional shopping mall. The surrounding area is dominated by commercial uses with some office, industrial, and residential uses. With implementation of General Plan and Specific Plan development standards and design criteria the impacts of the proposed project would be consistent with the impacts analyzed in the certified EIR for the Specific Plan. Improvements would also be required to meet the city public works standards. Any negative effects to aesthetics would be less than significant. 11 c. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The implementation of the final phase of the Specific Plan would.create limited light and glare that may adversely impact the surrounding area as lighting would be installed to enhance safety. These impacts would be reduced with implementation of the .night lighting standards as established by the Generai Plan and Specific Plan and that mandate that each project conform to Palomar Observatory lighting requirements as established in Riverside County Ordinance 655. With implementation of these mandatory design requirements for lighting and the mitigation measures included in the EIR, the proposed project will not cause significant night lighting impacts. . Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the aesthetic mitigation measures in the EIR, aesthetic issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. .Based on the analysis presented above, aesthetic issues related specifically to the proposed Development Agreement and final phase of Specific Plan development will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All aesthetic issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. No new aesthetic mitigation measures are required for this project.. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Issues (and Supporting Inlonnallon Sources): Potentfally Significant '''''"'' Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Significant No IrTllact I~ 12. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Seismicity: fault rupture? (1, 2, 14) y b) Seismicity: ground shaking or liquefaction? (1, 2,14) y c) Seismicity: special study zone? (1, 2, 14) y d) Landslides or mudslides? (1, 2, 14) y e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill?(1,2,14) y f) Subsidence of the land? (1,2,14) g) Expansive soils? (1, 2, 14) y y h) Unique geologic or physical features? (1, 2, 14) y Substantiation: The general impacts related to geology and soil issues from development of the project as part of implementation of the Specilic Plan are forecast on pages V-12 through V-24 of the certified TAC Final EIR (FEIA). The analysis of the Specific Plan, including the final phase of development, concluded that no significant adverse impacts to geology or soil resources would result from the Specific Plan implementation. Several mitigation measures were identified to address the project site geology and soil resource impacts. A geotechnical report of the site was prepared as part of1he environmental analysis in the certified EIR for the Specific Plan. This study is provided as part of the EIR, Volume III. The proposed project is located in a seismically active area as is all of southern California. The Elsinore fault and Murrieta Hot $prings fault are located within one mi.le of the project site. However, no active fault traces or faults have been found within the project site. It is estimated that an earthquake of magnitude 7.0 on the Richter scale could occur on the nearby Elsinore fault segment. Significant earthquakes have occurred on faults near the site. A total of 13.1 earthquakes of magnitude 5.0 or greater have occurred wilhin 100 miles of the site since 1932. 12a. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIA. The site is not located wilhin a State of California Fault-Hazard Zone for active faulting and no active faulttraces or faults have been found on the project site. Ground rupture normally occurs along pre-existing faults. As there are no active faults on the project site, the ground rupture potential is projected to be low to non-existent. , Temecula Regional Center Initial StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY The City requires construction to meet its geotechnical design standards. The project structural engineer is required to design the project based on the site-specific soil and bedrock constraints and seismic hazards. Implementing the standards required by the City and the published geotechnical requirements would ensure that the potential impacts associated with fauli rupture would be less than significant. Further, mitigation measures included in ttie EIR ensure that the final phase of Specific Plan will be constructed to meet City design standards. 12b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The site is located in a seismically active area typical of southern California and is likely to experience ground shaking due to earthquakes on nearby faulis. The maximum credible earthquake for the Elsinore-Temecula fault zone is 7.0 on the Richter Scale. The City requires construction to meet City standards and the project structural engineer would design the project based on the site-specific soil and bedrock constraints identified in published geotechnical reports for the project site. Implementing the standards required by the City and published geotechnical reports would ensure that the potential impacts associated with ground shaking would be less than significant. See mitigation listed under 12a above. . Sites with loose to medium dense soils in areas where ground water is within 40 feet of the surface are susceptible to liquefaction with strong ground shaking. There is potential for liquefaction in the northern part of the site as groundwater can be only 20 feet below the surface and soils are susceptible to liquefaction. However, the impacUn this issue area would be less than significant with' implementation of mitigation incorporated from the EIR and would be no greater than previously analyzed. 12c. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The nearest known special study zone and active fault is the Elsinore fault located within 0.4 mile .west of the site. It is estimated that an earthquake of magnitude 7.0 on the Richter scale could occur on this nearby fault segment. Significant earthquakes have occurred on faults near the site. However, as the site is not within a special study zone, impacts to this area are considered less than significant. 12d. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The landslide risk within the area is low due to the existing topography and the general competence of the underlying geology. Additionally, the site is now completely graded and ileveloped as with parking lots. The overall slope of the finished project would not create a significant potential for landslides or mudslides. Therefore the potential for landsliding and/or mudslides is considered less than significant. 12e. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The issue of erosion and sedimentation are discussed under issue 6c of this document. City grading standards, best management practices and the SWPPP and WQMP are required by mitigation to control the potential signfficant erosion hazards. The topography has been changed to accommodate development of earlier phases of Specffic Plan implementation and has been graded to avoid erosion. Erosion of the onsite soils is a potential impact during excavation, grading, fill and compacting operations. HoWever, if grading does occur as part of the project implementation, compliance with City and County standards can ensure . that the potential for significant erosion will be controlled on the project site and be less than significant. In addition, because the area of impact is greater than one acre, the final phase of the Specific Plan must be developed meeting current water quality requirements, including the filing of a Notice of Intent and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan. (WQMP). Since this is a mandatory requirement, no additional mitigation is required to control potential water quality impacts to a less than significant impact level. 12f. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR The soils on the site are susceptible to settlement from intense ground shaking caused by seismic activity. However, implementation of Temecula Regional Center Initial StudY!083106 TOM DODSON' & ASSOCIATES City of Temeaula Temeaula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY mitigation included in the EIR would reduce the level of significance in this issue area to less than significant. 12g. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project has soils with. generally low expansion potential. Therefore, impacts of expansive soils would be less than significant. If expansive soils are found on site, the City Would require soil preparation methods be used to ensure that impacts in this area remain less than significant. 12h. Imoacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The site has a rolling topography. However, this type of topography is typical of the area and no geologic features would be considered unique. Therefore, the impact to this issue area would be less than significant. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the referenced seismic safety and soil erosion mitigation measures in the EIR, geology and soil issues are not forec<lst to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Based on the analysis presented above, geology and soil issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All geology and soil issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the Development Agreement time extension and final development phase of the Specific Plan are approved and implemented. No new geology and soil mitigation measures are required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Issues (and Supporting Infonnation S~lCes): Potentially Significant ,,,,,act Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Leos "'an Signifloant No Impact Impact 13. HAZARDS. Would the proposafinvolve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances (including, but not .Iiinited to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? (1, 2,14) y b) Possible interference with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?(1,2,14) y c) The creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard? (1, 2,14) y d) Exposure of people to existing sources of potential health hazards? (1, 2,14) y e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable brush, grass, or trees? (1, 2,14) . y Substantiation: The general impacts related to hazard issues from development of the project as part of implementation of the Specific Plan are forecast on pages V-59 through V- q2 and generallythroughoutthe certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the Specific Plan, including the final phase of develppment, implies that no significant adverse Impacts to hazard issues would resultfrom the proposed project. Several mitigation measures were l"emecula RegIonal Center . Initial Study1083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY identified to address the project site ha<:ard impacts. A Preliminary Environmental Property Investigation of the site was prepared as part of the environmental analysis in the certified EIR for the TRC. 13a. Impacts Are Identified That Were Not Considered in the TRC EIR. During construction there is a potential for accidental release of petroleum products in sufficient quantity to pose a significant hazard to people and the environment. The City requires compliance with Best Management Practices to manage clean-up of potential spills othazardous materials during construction. The City also requires all spills or leakage of petroleum and other products during construction activities will be remediated in compliance with applicable state and local regulations regarding cleanup and disposal of the contaminant released. The SWPPP would also contain sufficient measures to address accidental spills. ThOUgh the risk of accidents would not be eliminated, it would be controlled to a less than significant level by implementing the standard City policies. No additional mitigation is required to assure an accidental spill will not result in significant water quality impacts. 13b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The project site would not interfere with an emergency response or evacuation plan. The City would require a traffic management plan to be implemented during construction that would ensure public safety and emergency access surrounding the site. Since the project is within a five-minute response time for fire protection and emergency response, the potential impact on emergency response and access is forecast to be less than significant. The project will be built to conforin to all City police, fire and public works standards. ' 13c. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Building construction can be associated with some ha<:ardous materials that, if misused or spilled, may cause a health ha<:ard to those nearby. Hazardous materials can also be discovered during grading and/or other earthmoving' activities. The City requires Best Management Practices be emplo~ed to minimize the risks associated with ItJOse unexpected events and the EIR also includes mitigation that would reduce the i"ilpacts of this issue to less than significant. As a result, handling and managing hazardous substances and equipment would result in be less than significant impacts from this issue. ,13d. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. Underground utilities are present on and near the site. However, the risk of these facilities posing a significant danger to the public is no more than occurs throughout the City or County where an extensive network of utilities serve each developed use. The utilities present are water distribution lines, sewer lines, electrical lines, natural gas lines, , cable facilities and potentially Verizon lines. Controlling construction activities ,as required in the following mitigation measure, the potential impact to the utility lines is considered less than significant. Also see Section 3 of this document. The Preliminary Environmental Property Investigationfound no toxic hazards on site.' No other potential ha<:ards are known to exist onsite. Therefore, a low probability exists that the site contains any hazardous materials. The risk of exposure of people to existing health ha<:ards would be considered less than significant with the mitigation in the EIR incorporated. 13e. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The project site is not located within a Wildland Fire Protection Agreement Area, i.e., an identified special hazard area that requires additional services be available from the Califomia Department' of Forestry. During project construction, City procedures will be followed so that all risks of accidental fire are reduced to less than significant. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the referenced ha<:ard mitigation measures in the EIR, hazard issues are not forecast to experience significant Temecula Regional Cente~ Initial StudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula T emecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY adverse impacts from project implementation. Based on the analysis presented above, hazard issues related specifically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All hazard issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts ff the project is approved and implemented. No new hazard mitigation is required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIA. Issues (and Supporting Infomlation Sources): Potentially Significant 1l11l8CI Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Slgnlllcanl No lf11)act Impact 14. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? (1,2,14) y b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (1,2,14) y . Substantiation: . The general impacts related to noise issues from development of the project as part of implem'entation of the Specific Plan are forecast on pages V-31 through V- 46 of the certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the Specific Plan, including ttle final phase, concluded that significant adverse impacts to noise issues would . result from the proposed Specific Plan implementation due to cumulative noise impacts resulting primarily from increases in traffic in the area over time. Mitigation measures were identified to address long-term project noise impacts and standard conditions for controlling construction noise. A Noise Assessment was prepared as part of the environmental analysis in the certified EIR for the TRC. This study is provided as part of the EIR, Volume III. . . 14a. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIA. Construction of the proposed project . would increase noise levels in the area and is considered a short-term impact to ambient noise levels. Noise generated by equipment can reach high episodic levels, but these episodes are of relatively . short duration and typically restricted to day light hours. . In order to control construction noise levels to a level consistent with the City Noise Element, the City would require noise redu.ction measures as conditions of approval for grading and building permits. Some standard policies include limiting the hours of construction activity, and requiring a construction- related noise mitigation plan for projects adjacentto sensitive receptors. The EIR also identifies a mitigation measure to address construction noise and several to address construction techniques to reduce interior and exterior noise impacts. Given the location of the final phase within the Mall, the potential for signfficant noise impacts on sensitive receptors is considered very low. As construction noise impacts are of relatively short and temporary duration, incorporation of these mitigation measures would reduce construction noise impacts to less than significant. The EIR concluded that cumulative nOise levels in the area of the project are considered significant and adverseaild cannot be mitigated to a level of I.ess thansignfficant. The Specific Plan would . contribute no significant stationary noise effects to off-site due to project implementation, but the noise levels in the sUrrounding area will continue to increase due to traffic. The noise increases are due to regional growth and location next to a majot north-south transportation corridor. The Specific Plan itself will contribute little and insignificantly to ultimate noise levels. No Changes in conditions orthe results of the analysis would occurasaresult of developing the final. phase of the Specific Plan analyzed in the TRC EIR. Temecula Regional Center Initial Study!OB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES Cily of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY 14b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. None of the activities associated with the proposed project, either during construction or during operation of the completed Specific Plan is forecast to generate severe noise levels. However, in order to ensure that exposure of people to severe noise levels is reduced to a less than significant level, implementation of the construction noise mitigation measure and standard city procedures is recommended. No routine aircraft overflights or alrpoit operations occur within the project area. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in the EIR and compliance with the City of Temecula Municipal Code and policies, potential severe noise impacts would be less than significant. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the referenced noise standard conditions and mitigation measures in the EIR, noise issues are not forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. There will be a significant and adverse cumulative noise impact due to regional growth. However the contribution of the Specific Plan, including its final phase of development is not considered significant or potentially significant. Based on the analysis presented above, noise issues related specifically to the implementation of the final phase of development of the TRC Specific Plan will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Apart from area-wide cumulative impacts, all noise issues are forecast to experience less than significant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. No new noise mitigation is required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRC Final EIR. Issues (and Supporting Information Sources): Potentially SIgnificant '''''''''' Potenllally Significant Unless Mitigated '-""than Slgnfficant No Irrpact .1f11Jact 15. AIR QUAUTY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation? (1,2,14) y b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? (1,2, 14) y c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, . or cause any change in ciimate? (1,2,14) y d) Create objectionable odors? (1,2,14) y Substantiation: The general impacts related to air quality issues from development of the project as part of implementatiqn of the Specific Plan are forecast on pages V-47 through V-55 Qfthe certified TRC Final EIR (FEIR). The analysis of the Specific Plan, including the final phase of development for the SpeCific Plan, concluded that Air Quality impacts were potentially significant and would not be reduced tq less than significant even with mitigation. Mitigation measures were identified to address short-term project construction air quality impacts, but impacts were still considered significant. . Temecufa RegiolJal Center Initial Study1083106 . tOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY 15a &b. Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project is the time extension of the existing Development Agreement in order to construct the final phase of an approved Specific Plan. The EIR analysis concluded that implementation of the Specific Plan, including the final phase would result in localized and basin-wide cumulative exceedances of air quality standards. All emissions were determined to be at or above thresholds during construction and operation even with mitigation. The proposed project impacts are relatively the same as those evaluated in the EIR. Note that regional air quality is improving slowly as vehicle emissions are reduced wtth new vehicles replacing older vehicles. This change does not alter the fact that emissions from the Specttic Plan are considered significant because they exceed thresholds, but the fulfillment of the Specific Plan, from a jobslhousing standpoint and due to reduced vehicle miles traveled for local residents seeking Mall retail facilities, are consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan presently in place. 15.c Impacts Remain the Same as Characterized in the TRC EIR. The proposed project does not include uses or encompass a large enough project to cause significant changes in area climate. No impact was identttied and no mitigation was required. 15.d Impacts Are Identified That Were Not Considered in the TRC EIR The EIR did not evaluate the potential for significant odor generation or exposure. During construction, the proposed project includes operations that will have diesel odors associated with equipment and materials. None of these odOrs are permanent, nor are they normally considered so offensive as to ,cause sensitive receptors to complain. Diesel fuel odors from construction equipment and new asphalt paving fall into this category. Boih based on the short-term of the emissions and the, characteristics of these emissions, no significant odor impacts are forecast to result from implementing the proposed project. Conclusion The proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be impl,emented. Based on the analysis presented above, and implementation of the , , 'referenced air quality standard conditions and mitigation measures in the EIR, air quality issues are forecast to experience significant adverse impacts from project implementation. Based on the analysis presented above, air quality issues related specifically to the proposed project, a time extension of a Development Agreement . and. construction of the final phase .of a Specific Plan will contribute .to the potentially sigfJificant adverse It) impactstrom project implementation. All air quality issues are forecast to experience significant impacts ttthe project is approved and implemented. The impacts will'remain relatively the same as were analyzed in the EIR. No new mitigation is required for this project. This finding is consistent with the data contained in the TRCFinal EIR." , !emectila Regional Center Initial Study1083106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES J i i( City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Issues (and Supporting Infon:natlon Sources): Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated Less than Slgnlficant No Ill1lact Il'IlIact 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife populati9n to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or .endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of . the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? y y c) Does the project have impacts which are individually IimRed, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project. .are considerable when viewed in connection wRh the effects of past projects, the effects of .other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? y y . Substantiation: The proposed project consists of a proposed Development Agreement Amendment to extend the term of the Temecula Regional Center Development Agreement an addRional three years to provide for the future development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the approved Temecula Regional. Center SpeCific Plan. The project is part of the City of Temecula Specific Plari No. 263. The construction and operation of this proposed project has been evaluated as having no potentially significant effects that are significantly greater than those analyzed in the EIR and that would not be reduced to less than significant level with mRigation incorporated from the Specific Plan EIR. In addition, changes in circumstances for issues such as biological resources (MSHCP), water quality (SWPPP and WQMP)and air quality (better regional air quality) do not result in additional significant adverse impact that requires new. mitigation measures. The following text summarizes potential impacts and recommendations. 16a. . Potentially significant environmental impacts associated with the proposed project have been identified in the areas of biological and cultural resources for the Specific Plan in the Specific Plan EIR. However, based on technical studies for these issues, all but cumulative imp,acts to Wildlife and Vegetation were reduced to a less than significant impact level by implementing the mitigation measures identified in Sections 7 and 9 of this InRial Study. With mRigation, all biological and cultural resources impacts were reduced to a less than significant level, except for cumulative impacts. . No further analysis of these two Temecuta Regional ~nter Initial SiudylOB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES ) C...) Cily of Temeoula Temeoula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY issue areas is required and the findings of this Initial Study are consistent with the findings in the certified TRC EIR for these two issues. The proposed project is being constructed on an already urbanized site and biology mitigation measures have been fulfilled and are no longer applicable. Generally, the potential effects on cultural resources have also already occurred and mitigation implemented. However, some impacts may occur and mitigation for cultural resources in the TRC EIR will be implemented to ensure that they remain the same as those evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. 16b . &c. Potentially significant long-term and cumulative impacts of the proposed project as part of the Specific Plan were analyzed in the EIR and were associated with the following areas: transportation/circulation, air quality, seismic safety, agricultural lands, noise, circulation, wildlife/vegetation, flood/drainage, public facilities, and utilities. The adverse long-term and cumulative impacts in these areas would not be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. No further analysis of these issues is required. All other issues with a potential for cumulative impact or short-term impacts to the detriment of the long-term environment were determined to be less than significant, or in some cases less than significant with implementation of mitigation. No further analys'is .of these cumulative issue areas is required and the findings of .this Initial Study are consistent with the findings in the certified TRC EIR for these issues. The proposed project would have impacts that remain relatively the same as those evaluated in the Specific Plim EIR. 16d. The project complies with existing land use designations and zoning and with mitigation (or mandatory design requirements) for.aesthetic issues, hazards, and noise impacts. Even with mitigation, potential air quality, circulation, seismic safety, flood/drainage, public facilities, utilities and noise impacts associated with the Specific Plan, and this the final phase of development, would result in exposure of humans to substantial adverse impacts due to the cumulative impacts of general growth in the area that cannot be mitigated to a level of non-significance. No further analysis of these human iinpact issue areas is required and the findings of this Initial Study are consistent with the findings in the certified TRC EIR for these issues. The proposed project would have impacts that remain relatively the same as those evaluated in the Specific Plan EIR. . Conclusion The. proposed project is the extension of the existing development agreement during which the final phase of development will be implemented. The project analyzed in this document is essentially the same as the project analyzed in the Temecula Regional Center EIR. Thus, this Initial Study was prepared to detennine whatthe impacts of the revised project, which consists of a time extension of a Development Agreement in order to develop the final phase of a Specific Plan, would be equivalent to that analyzed in .the EIR. This finding is based on implementation of mitigation measures identified in the original EIR and City imposition of and enforcement of mandatory or st<!ndard conditions of approval when the final phase of the Specific Plan is implemented. The analysis indicates that no new significant effects will be caused by including this modification to the overall project analyzed in the EIR. The impacts will remain relatively the same as . analyzed in the EIR. Because no new mitigation measures have been identified and required for the proposed projectto ensure no significant impacts will result from its implementation, the City can issue an Addendum to the certified TRC EIR as the appropriate CEQA environmental determination. Neither a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR nor a Negative Declaration is required to comply with CEQA for this project. The Citywill adopt an Addendum to the EIR for the proposed project. The City Council will consider adoption of an Addendum to the certified Temecula Regional Center EIR to consider in conjunction with a decision on whether to proceed with the Development Agreement amendment and final phase of the Specific Plan as described in this document. .~ Temecola Regional Center Initial SiudylO83106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES , ". City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL STUDY Yes No 17. DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME "DE MINIMIS" IMPACT FINDINGS. . a) Does the project have the potential to cause any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively, on fish and wildlife? Wildlife is defined as "all wild animals, birds, plants, fish, amphibians, and related ecological communities, including the habttat upon which the wildlife depends on for it's continued viability" (Section 711.2, Fish and Game Code). y The proposed project is the time extension of a Development Agreement for the purpose of completing th~ final phase of a Specific Plan within a completely disturbed site. The site is a developed shopping center and the project would be developed within an area thatis completely paved. . 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. A previous CEOA analysis of the site for the proposed project includes the EIR for the Temecula Regional Center (Specific Plan 263) which was certified in July 1993. The recently adopted City General Plan EIR, 2005, also provided substantiating data utilized in the Initial Study. The proposed project is consistent with the Specilic Plan analyzed in the TRC EIR. . Temecula Regional Center .Inltlal Study/083106 . 'TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Cenler INmALSTUDY . FIGURES Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/OB3106 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of Temecula Temecula Regional Center INITIAL. STUDY . Data use sUbject to license., @2004DeLorme.XMap(ID4,5. WNN.delonne.com 1 MN (12.1' E) ~ml o 2 4 6 8 10 Data Zoom 9-0 Temecula RegIonal Center Initial Study1083106' TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES City of T emecula Temecula Regional Center "i INITIAL STUDY Data use subject to license. lW 2004 OeLorme.XMaI04.5. www.delonne.com MN (12.7' E) Temecula Regional Center Initial Study/083106. 1 ~'. o BOO 1600 2400 3200 4000 Data Zoom 13*0 TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES ATTACHMENT NO.7 EIR ADDENDUM G:\PJanning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 12 ADDENDUM TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER .ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT This document is an Addendum to the Temecula Regional Center Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"). Pursuant to California Enviroumental Quality Act ("CEQA") Guidelines section 15164(a) (14 CaI. Code of Regs. ~15000 et. ~.), the City of Temecula has prepared this Addendum to make a minor change to a previously certified EIR. Additionally, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15164(e), the Addendum must include a brief explanation of the City's decision not to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR. Project Description and Background The City of Temecula proposes to extend a Development Agreement (due to expire in January 2007) for a period of three years to expire in January 2010, for subsequent construction '. of the final phase of retail commercial space and parking facilities within the Temecula Regional Center core commercial area in an area. The proposed project would be developed within Planning Area 2 of the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP 263) arid would be located primarily between the current Macy's department store and Edwards. Cinema and also on the north side of the Edwards Cinema within the current core shopping area. The existing Regional Center currently has 2,1l7,545 square feet of existing and approved development. The approved Specific' Plan for the TemeculaRegional Center allows up to 2,483,000 square feet of development. The extension of the Development Agreement would continue the agreement with the City under which the development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the Specific Plan would be implemented. In 1993 the City of Temecula certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the construction and occupancy ora new regional retail center, business and office center, and hotel and residential area, entitled the . "Temecula Regional Center EIR". The EIR addressed the construction and operation of all allowed uses and intensities of uses for the proposed regional center. The current Development Agreement, adopted in December 1996, sets forth the obligations of the developer and the City in order for development to be consistent with the adopted Specific Plan. Under the proposed Development Agreement, the filial phase of Specific . Plan implementation would occiIr, allowing for buildout of the Specific Plan. The additional square footage of retail space would be developed as part of the Temecula Regional Center consistent with the approved Specific Plan in the same manner required by the current Development Agreement. The proposed Development Agreement outlines the responsibilities of the developer, Temecula Towne Center Associates, LJ'., and the City to complete the Specific , Plan process. Legal Standard As noted above, an addendnm should include a brief explanation of the lead agency's decision not to prepare a subsequent EIR. A lead agericy may only require the preparation of a 915441.1 August 30,2006 I ) subsequent or supplemental EIR under very narrow circumstances. . SeCtion 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines states: "a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no . subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless that lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following: (l) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the .project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration. due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or . (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not. discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be infeasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more . significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternatives; or (0) Mitigation meaSures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the. previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant t<ffects on the environment, but the project proponents . decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative." Further, Section 15163 allows for the preparation 01' a supplement to an EIR in the following circumstances: \ "(a). The Lead or Responsible Agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR if; 915441.1 August 30, 2006 2 (1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of asubsequentEUR,and (2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed sitUation." CEQA Findings The City prepared an Initial Study to detemnine whether the extension of the Development Agreement or construction of the final Phase of the Specific Plan triggered any of the conditions ( described above) which require the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR. The City hereby incorporates the Initial Study as part of this Addendum. The Initial Study evaluated the impacts of the proposed extension of the Development Agreement on Land Use and Planning, Public Services, Utilities and Service Systems, Population luid Housing, Transportation/Circulation, Water, Biological Resources, Energy and Mineral Resources, Cultural Resources, Recreation, Aesthetics, Geophysical, Hazards, Noise, Air Quality and Mandatory Findings of Significance. ~ . The Initial Study compared the environmental impacts of the proposed extension of the Development Agreement with the identified environmental impacts of the approved Development Agreement evaluated in the previously certified Temecula Regional Center EIR. The analysis in the Initial Study indicates that no new significant .effects will be caused by proposed extension to the Development Agreement ana subsequent construction of the final phase of the Specific Plan. Nor will the proposed extension to the Development Agreement increase the severity of any previously identified significant impact. The impacts will remain the same as analyzed in the Temecula Regional Center EUR. The Initial Study also analyzed whether new circumstances would -result in new significant effects or increase the severity of previously identified effects. The Initial Study found that no new circumstances exist that introduce new significant effects or increase the severity of previously identified significant effects. " Further, the Initial Study analyzed whether new information exists that indicates that the project would introduce new significant effects or increase the severity of previously identified significant effects, or whether any new information suggests new mitigation measures or shows . that the mitigation measures previously identified as infeasible are in fact feasible. The Initial Study found no new information thaf suggested new significant effect or increased the severity of previously identified effects. Nor did any new information suggest new mitigaqon measures or suggest that mitigation measures previously identified as infeasible were in fact feasible. . Because the Initial Study finds no new significant effects, no increase in the severity of previously identified effects, no new mitigation measures and no change in the mitigation measures previously discussed, the City finds that a supplemental or subsequent EUR need not be prepared, and that the. City may rely on this Addendum to approve the proposed extension to. the Development Agreement. 915441..1 August 30, 2006 3 ATTACHMENT NO.8 CONFORMED NOTICE OF DETERMINATION G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 13 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEIPT ry~;;-(;--O I] I' i! 1 C-' "---;;1 t,li i,,';., l.~~ lb ~.~~ ~ 'IJ !_~! f; d . -~ ", q Ii li'i OCT 2 7 7006 I l~,; (jAfA1jl1J Receipt # 200601088 Lead Agency: CITY OF TEMECULA Date: 09/1312006 County Agency of Filing: Riverside Document No: 200601088 Project Title: TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN EIR ADDENDUM NO.3 tn-"", Project ,;tpplicant Name: CITY OF TE~CULA Phone Number: Project Applicant Address: 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA CA 92590 Project Applicant: Local Public Agency CHECK APPLICABLE FEES: lID Environmental Impact Report o Negative Declaration o Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) o Project SubjeCt to Certified Regula/Dry Programs .IID County Administration Fee o Project that is exemptfromfees (DeMinimis Exemption) o Project that is exemptfromfees (No/ice of Exemption) $850.00 $64.00 Total Received $914.00 Signature and tide Q{ person receiving payment: ~....,;r~ ~~.R "Notes: , City of Temecula Planning Department Notice of Determination TO: FROM: Planning Department City of Temecula 4:3200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 County Clerk and Recorders Office County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a N@tice of Determ\hation in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code. State Clearinghouse No.: Project Title: Project Location: [FRIV~RSID'hOU~Y lQ) ::iEP 1 3 2006 LARRYW. WARD, CLERK By oJ rYl--'-' T. Marshall 7. Depu~ Project Description: Lead Agency: Contact Person: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan EIR Addendum No.3 The proposed project is an amendment to extend a Development Agreement and the final phase of development within the 179 acre (excluding roads) Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) in the City of Temecu!a bound by Winchester Road to the north, Margarita Road to the east, Overland Road to the south and Ynez Road to the west within an::. unsectioned area of Township 7 South, Range 3 West San Bergll-~lI1o' Meridian on the USGS Murrieta Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series T.ojJtigraphic Map (see Figures 1 and 2) A proposed Development Agreement Amendment to extend the term'. of the Temecula Regional Center Development Agreement an additional three years to provide for the future development of the remaining square footage allowed under the final phase of the T emecula Regional Center SpeCific Plan City of Temecula Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters Telephone Number: (951) 694-6400 This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on September 12, 2006 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project ([ ] will [X]will not) have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That ([Xl An Environmental Impact Report [ ] A Negative Declaration) was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures ([X] were [ ] were not) made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Statement of Overriding Consideration ([X] was [ ] was not) adopted for this project. 5. . Findings ([X] were [ ] were not) made pursuant to the provisions of CEOA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: ' ~~~~'s/~ Debbie Ubnoske, Director' of Planning Date: y?gt)i~~~~fr~4nation POSTED ,>tP 1;) zllll'ti Removed: /0 - ( & ' By: ~, Dapt. County of Riverside, State of California Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: R:\FORMS\CEQADEM 9/13/06 klb. ATTACHMENT NO.9 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\Planning\PC staff report MEMO - Mall Ring Rd Plan.doc 14 Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA07-0316 Forest City Development Corporation Promenade Mall - bound by Ynez Road, Winchester Road, Margarita Road and Overland Road A Major Modification for the Ring Road Enhancement Plan to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road at the Promenade Mall. Site modifications include additional traffic signais, additional all-way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage. enhanced pedestrian crossing, and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously adopted Environmental Impact Report and Addendum and no further environmental review is required. A Notice Qf Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162. Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Associate Planners City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 January 16, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approvai of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Pianning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. ~.. - ..- ~i= G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0316 Ring Road Plan at Promenade\PlanningINOPH-PC.doc COUNCIL BUSINESS ITEM NO. 17 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Selection of City Council Committee Assignments RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: Commission Liaison (One Member) Current Member Community Services Commission Old Town Local Review Board Planning Commission Public/Traffic Safety Commission Comerchero Washington Naggar Edwards 2. Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Standing Committees: Standing Committees Current Members Economic Development RDA/Old Town Steering Committee Finance Committee Infrastructure Beautification Committee Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee Murrieta/Temecula Committee Public Works/Facilities Committee Medical Task Force Committee - Proposed Addition Washington, Roberts Comerchero, Edwards Edwards, Naggar Edwards, Naggar Edwards, Washington Naggar, Washington Edwards, Roberts 3. Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Representative Assignments (External Organizations): Representive AssiQnments - External Organizations Animal Shelter Liaison/JPA Representative League of California Congress - 2008 Voting Delegate Murrieta Creek Advisory Board National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2008 Voting Delegate Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Riverside County Child Safety Commission Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors WRCOG/RCA Representative RCA Representative Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) Current Members Edwards Washington, (Alternate Naggar) Washington Washington, (Alternate Naggar) Roberts, (Alternate Naggar) Edwards Roberts, (Alternate Comerchero) Comerchero, (Alternate Edwards) Edwards Washington, (Alternate Roberts) Edwards Washington, (Alternate Edwards) 4. Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Ad Hoc Subcommittees: Ad Hoc Subcommittees - (Can be one or two members) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition External Communications Ad Hoc Subcommittee Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition Homeless Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee Military Ad Hoc Subcommittee Nicolas Valley Ad Hoc Subcommittee Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Promenade Mall Ad Hoc Subcommittee Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee Roripaugh Ranch Ad Hoc Subcommittee San Diego State University Visitor's Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Santiago & Ynez Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee Transit Ad Hoc Subcommittee Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Subcommittee Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Youth Master Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee - Proposed Addition Current Members Edwards, Naggar Comerchero, Edwards Washington, Edwards Washington, Roberts Washington, Edwards Roberts, Washington Comerchero, Roberts Comerchero, Washington Edwards, Naggar Comerchero, Roberts Roberts, Naggar Edwards, Roberts Comerchero, Naggar Roberts, Comerchero Edwards, Roberts Comerchero, Edwards BACKGROUND: The City Council has established the policy of appointing one of its members to serve as liaison to each of the city commissions. This policy also included appointing council members to serve as the council's representatives to external organizations and on a number of standing committees and ad hoc subcommittees. The above committee structure is recommended to facilitate the efficient flow of communication. Each year this list is reviewed and revised for the upcoming calendar year. The council members appointed on each of these respective committees will serve through calendar year 2008. Ad Hoc Subcommittees are formed for a specific limited purpose and will operate for a limited time until its purposes are fulfilled ("ad hoc") as opposed to "standing committees" that have continuing subject matter jurisdiction. The descriptions of the purposes and duration of the proposed ad hoc subcommittees are as follows: Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee reviews funding applications from various non-profit organizations requesting Community Service funding for the year. This committee will meet in October/November 2008 and will make specific recommendations to the City Council for 2008 community services funding. Diaz Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible for evaluating and negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the Agency owned property located at the North West Corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway. Currently, the responses to request for qualifications of developers is pending before the Agency and is expected to be acted upon in 2008. The term of this committee is through the completion of the development or disposition of the property. External Communications Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible for addressing the expansion of local news coverage possibly in both radio and television not only within Temecula but the Inland Empire. Of significant challenge for this committee will be the support and presentation of a new or "niche" Designated Media Area (DMA) for consideration by Federal officials and the FCC. The subcommittee will report back to the Council on its findings by February 2009 with more frequent updates as may be necessary. Higher Education Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible for attracting and facilitating the development of a higher education facility in the City of Temecula. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendation by February 2009 with more frequent updates as may be necessary. Homeless Shelter Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible to work with county and non-profit, faith-based sector to explore transitional shelters for the homeless. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Luxury Car Dealership Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible for the attraction of luxury car dealerships to our community. Auto sales represent a large percentage of sales tax revenue to the City and the expansion and attraction of dealerships will preserve a revenue stream to maintain City services. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Military Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee shall work with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (\./FW), Camp Pendleton, and other branches of the military to assist active members of the military with special projects and community outreach. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Nicolas Valley Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee shall work with the residents of Nicolas Valley to develop new land use designations which could ultimately allow the formation of an Assessment District to allow for the paving of certain roads in Nicolas Valley. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will need to guide this effort for the next year. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee is responsible for reviewing and providing general guidance related to the design of the Civic Center in Old Town. It is also responsible for evaluating and negotiating terms and conditions associated with the disposition and development of the Agency owned property located adjacent to the Town Square along Main Street in Old Town. The term of this committee is through the completion of the Civic Center. Promenade Mall Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee was established to provide policy direction for the expansion to the Promenade Mall. It is anticipated that the mall will continue to evolve and this subcommittee will be necessary through 2009 when the Mall Expansion is expected to be completed. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee will meet as needed and work with the Friends of the Ronald Reagan Sports Park to review proposed public art piece for installation at the park. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Roripaugh Ranch Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee will monitor and report on the issues affecting the Roripaugh Ranch Community Facility District Bonds, litigation affecting the Roripaugh Ranch Project, and development issues affecting the Roripaugh Ranch Project. The subcommittee shall report back to the Council as needed during 2008 and 2009. San Diego State University Visitor's Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee shall work with staff to discuss the feasibility of creating a visitor center for habitat awareness. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Santiago & Ynez Property Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee will work with community residents and staff to design passive park amenities at this park site location. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee was formed to work with Universal Health Systems to locate a new hospital in Temecula. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will need to continue with this effort until the Hospital obtains its State approvals in 2008. TransitAd Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee shall work with staff on the development and implementation of commuter transit services between Temecula Valley and north San Diego County. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee was formed to work with staff and the property owner to develop a vision plan for the Firestone land holdings located on the westerly side of Old Town. It is anticipated that this subcommittee will guide this effort for this next year. Youth Master Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee - This subcommittee will work with staff and the community to implement phases of the Youth Master Plan. The subcommittee will report back to the City Council on its recommendations by February 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS ITEM NO. 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Monthly Report The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development Department for the months of November and December 2007. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases The Division received 89 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home occupations including 15 applications for public hearings during the months of November and December. The new public hearing cases are as follows: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXTENSION OF TIME MAJOR MODIFICATION MINOR MODIFICATION TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ZONING AMENDMENT 4 2 1 2 4 1 1 Special Proiects & LonQ RanQe PlanninQ Activities The Long Range Planning Division commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major special projects and long range planning activities currently in progress are described in the paragraphs below: . Temecula Regional Hospital - The Riverside County Superior Court overturned the City Council's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project and staff has worked with the applicant and City Attorney's office to prepare a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report to address issues related to noise, traffic mitigation and an off-site contaminated groundwater plume. Each Planning Application that was originally approved went through the approval process a second time, including Planning Commission and City Council public hearings. Staff processed three contracts with sub-consultants to manage the special studies required forthe Supplemental EIR. Planning Applications were submitted on July3, 2007. A Notice of Preparation of a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was sent to the State on July 6, 2007. The Supplemental EIR was released for public review from November 5, 2007 to December 5, 2007. A Planning Commission meeting was held on January 9, 2008 and the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report and approve the project as proposed including all of the associated Planning Applications. This project has been scheduled fora City Council hearing on January 22, 2008. (PAPP) . General Plan Land Use Map Update - Planning staff and GIS have completed revision exhibits that explain the necessary changes to the Land Use Map caused by overlapping data sets, differences in conceptual plans versus recorded maps, and changes in the built environment. Some examples of changes include streets currently shown as residential will have no land use designation, Specific Plan areas will be modified to reflect recorded maps, and new park and school sites will be noted as Open Space and Public Institutional Facilities. All property owners affected by the proposed map changes will be notified bymail prior to any hearing. A Planning Commission hearing was held on August 15, 2007. The City has received a letter from the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) stating that prior to adoption of the proposed land use changes; the City must go through the ALUC public hearing process to determine that the proposed land use changes are consistent with the Airport Land Use Consistency Plan. An ALUC hearing was scheduled for January 10, 2008 where a finding of consistency was made. This item will be scheduled for a City Council hearing in February or March 2008. (PAPP) . General Plan Housing Element Update - Staff has been attending WRCOG workshops on the Regional Housing Needs Assessment in preparation for the update of the City's Housing Element. SCAG released the Final Regional Housing Needs Assessment numbers to cities and agencies in the region in July 2007. State law requires the City to adopt an update to the Housing Element by June 30, 2008 and it must be certified by the State Department of Housing and Urban Development by December 31, 2008. The City has entered into an agreement with Environmental Science Associates to assist with the update of the Housing Element. Planning staff has prepared a task list for each department that will assist in the effort, and each department has completed its tasks. A timeline has been prepared that ensures the process will be completed on time. The City Council must certify the updated Housing Element prior to June 30, 2008. (PAPP) . Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Area - Staff is undergoing an opportunities and constraints analysis of the properties contained within the Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Plan area to develop strategies to assist property owners with the construction of needed infrastructure and services. This area is lacking paved roadways, water transmission lines, wastewater collection, cable television, etc. Because of the relatively few properties in the area, assessment districts may be too costly for property owners. Staff needs to map the existing flood plain and complete a slope analysis to create a comprehensive constraints map of the area. Staff met with the Council Subcommittee in late February to brief the Council on staff strategies for bringing much needed services into the area. It was determined that a public workshop should be held to solicit input from area residents. Workshops were held on March 29, 2007 and May 15, 2007, with about 60 Nicolas Valley residents attending each workshop. Staff has been working on creating a conceptual land use plan and conceptual financing options to pay for needed road improvements. A third workshop was held on November 29,2007 where information on infrastructure options and recommended density was provided to residents and interested parties. The results of a survey conducted that evening indicated that a majority of property owners favor the formation of an assessment District and favor increased density. Staff will schedule a briefing meeting with the Nicolas Valley City Council Subcommittee in late January to discuss findings and to seek further direction. (PAPP) . Transit Center and Transit System Planning - Staff is working with the County of Riverside Flood Control District, Army Corp of Engineers and Riverside Transit Agency staff to locate the proposed transit center adjacent to the recreation portion of the Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project, generally located in the vicinity of Jefferson Avenue and Cherry Street. The transit center will act as the hub for regional and local transit connections within the Temecula Valley. Staff continues to coordinate with County Flood Control in order to receive approval to move forward with design of the proposed transit center. Additionally, staff is coordinating a multi agency meeting with SANDAG and North County Transit District (NCTD) to view the Escondido Transit Center, discuss aspects of their Master Planning Document, discuss concepts for local and regional transit planning, and to discuss smart growth concepts as it related to transit planning. (WEST) . Noise Ordinance - The Noise Ordinance was unanimously approved by the City Council on September 25, 2007 and became effective on November 9, 2007. Staff is currently in the process of purchasing sound measuring and calibration equipment. The vendorwill provide training to staff on proper handling and use of the equipment. (PAPP) . Water Efficient Landscaping Ordinance - AB 1881 requires local governments to adopt the State of California recently adopted Model Ordinance or an equally effective ordinance by 2010. Staff has been working with the City's Landscape Architect to update the City's current Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Staff has completed a draft of the revised plant list, water budget formula, irrigation specifications, residential specification and is currently completing the commercial specification. Staff is also coordinating with the water agencies to ensure consistency with their water conservation goals. Staff anticipates bringing a draft ordinance to the Planning Commission in March. (WEST) . Massage Ordinance - Staff is working with the Temecula Police Department to develop a new massage ordinance that is more restrictive than the existing ordinance and will be implemented and monitored directly by the Police Department. The proposed ordinance will require each employee to undergo several hundred hours of training, to wear identification at all times and includes more severe penalties for violators and business owners. Temecula PD will be scheduling briefing meetings with members of the City Council. (PAPP) . Hillside Development Policy - The policies are being examined for integration into the draft- grading ordinance. Staff is working with GIS to analyze topography, soil types, environmental (habitat), and other constraints. (PAPP) . Heritage Tree Ordinance - The proposed Heritage Tree Ordinance has been prepared and is being reviewed by the City Attorney's office. The ordinance will serve to protect certain identified tree species and other large diameter trees throughout the City. A public hearing date has not been set at this time. (PAPP) . Procedures to Implement CEQA - Projectto develop local guidelines and procedure manual for processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of local exemptions, significance thresholds, and procedures for the City to contract for the preparation of Environmental Impact Reports. This effort has been expanded to include internal procedures for coordinating the environmental review of Capital Improvement Projects. (PAPP) . Sustainable Development Program - Staff has been participating on a sub committee of the WRCOG Planners T AC to review and develop a recommendation regarding the California Green Building program; a voluntary program thatthe BIA is in support. The Sub Committee is recommending support of the program in concept, but will continue to review green development programs being implemented by other jurisdictions. Staff is preparing a matrix of mandatory and voluntary programs with the intent to bring forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission before the end of 2008. (WEST) . Santa Margarita Area Annexation - Staff is reviewing the draft Environmental Impact Report forthe annexation area. Staff is also reviewing the draft the Plan for Municipal Services, one of the Local Agency Formation Commission application requirements for the expansion of Sphere of Influence and the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. (WEST) Planning Agenda Report 11-01-2007 through 12-31-2007 PA07-0180 FIRST BANK A T RTTC Recently Approved APN# PM.26232.1 CHERYL KITZEROW/MATT PETERS 1. A Major Modification to review the site plan and elevations for a 4,034 square foot First Bank Building on Pad L at Rancho Temecula Town Center located on the corner of Nicolas Road and Winchester Road. 6/13/2007 Approved Date 11/7/2007 Submitted Date . P A07 -0290 Certified Farmers Market CUP APN# 922023022 BETSY LOWREY A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a Farmers Market open each Saturday from 8:00 a.m. until 12:30 p.m. located at the northwest corner of Mercedes and Sixth Street to include APN 922-023-021 and a portion of APN 922-023-022 at 28464 Old Town Front Street. 10/17/2007 Approved Date 11/612007 Submitted Date . PA07 -0305 LOWE'S CHRISTMAS TREE LOT APN# 910330011 KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit for a Christmas Tree Lot to be held November 18, 2007 through December 20,2007 at Lowe's Home Improvement Center, 40390 Winchester Road. 10/30/2007 Approved Date 11/18/2007 Submitted Date PA07 -0308 CHRISTMAS TREE LOT APN# 965410003 KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit for a Christmas Tree Lot to be operated from November 23,2007 to December 24, 2007 at 33320 Temecula Parkway. Submitted Date 10/31/2007 Approved Date 11/21/2007 1015 2. Planning Agenda Report 11-01-2007 through 12.31-2007 Scheduled for Hearing APN # PA07-0198 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL 959080001 EMERY J. PAPP A General Plan Amendment to eliminate the two-story height limitation within the existing Z-Overlay (Future Specific Plan) designation for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 7/3/2007 11/15/2007 1/22/2008 . PA07-0199 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL APN# 959080010 EMERY J. PAPP A proposed Zone Change (Planned Development Overlay) to create a new PDO-9 and increase the maximum allowable height to accommodate two-bed towers for the Temecula Regional Hospital Project Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 7/3/2007 11/15/2007 1/22/2008 . PA07-0200 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL APN # 959080001 EMERY J. PAPP A Development Plan to permit the construction of a 320-bed hospital with one six-story bed tower and one five-story bed tower, a four-story medical office building, a three-story medical office building, a single-story cancer treatment and research center, a single-story physical fitness and therapy center, and surface parking on a 39.5 acre site. Total building square footage is approximately 565,300 square feet. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 7/3/2007 11/15/2007 1/22/2008 PA07 -0201 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL APN# 959080001 EMERY J. PAPP A Tentative Parcel Map to consolidate eight parcels into one parcel on 39.5 acres located between Highway 79 South to the south, DePortola Road to the north, and aproximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 7/3/2007 11/15/2007 1/22/2008 . P A07 -0202 TEMECULA REGIONAL HOSPITAL APN # 959080001 EMERY J. PAPP A Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction and operation of a 320-bed hospital facility, including a helipad for the proposed Temecula Regional Hospital Project. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 7/3/2007 11/15/2007 1/22/2008 . PA07 -0286 Promenade Mall W. Gar. Deck Mod APN # 910420005 CHERYL KITZEROW/MA TT PETERS A Major Modification application to construct an additional parking level/deck at the West Garage at the Promenade Mall expansion (PA06-0293 and PA07-0154). Project is located between Macy's and Edwards Cinema at the Promenade Mall, bound by Winchester Road, Margarita Road, Overland Road and Ynez Road. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision 10/11/2007 111612008 APN # 2 of 5 Planning Agenda Report 11-01-2007 through 12-31-2007 PA07 -0316 Promenade Mall Ring Rd Plan 910130072 CHERYL KITZEROWIMA TT PETERS A Major Modification to PA97-0118 (Promenade Mall) to provide for vehicular and pedestrian enhancements to the Ring Road. Site modifications include additional traffic signals, additional all way stops, access reconfiguration, modified striping and signage, pedestrian enhancements and aisle closures with associated landscape modifications. Submitted Date DRC Meeting Date City Council 11/9/2007 1/22/2008 3 of 5 . PA07 -0003 TEMECULA CEMETERY MODULAR UNIT Planning Agenda Report 11-01-2007 through 12-31-2007 New"Sl.lbmittcilsiP~ndirigDRCMeeting APN # 944020004 KNUTE NOLAND 3. A Major Temporary Use Permit to install a modular office structure at the Temecula Cemetery located at 41911 C Street (APN: 944-020-004) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Administrators Hearing 1/5/2007 12112/2007 APN # . P A07 -0309 PDO-6 Zoning Amendment 959060007 ERIC JONES A Zoning Amendment application to amend the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6). The site is generally located on Temecula Parkway approximately 325 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 11/1/2007 . PA07 -0337 Kaiser Temecula APN # 910272007 DANA SCHUMA A Conditional Use Permit with a Development Plan to construct a parking lot on a 1.54 acre lot located at 41430 Sanborn Avenue. The parking lot will provide additional parking spaces for Kaiser medical offices to be located on the adjacent parcel. (Related project: PA07-0336) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 12/13/2007 111012008 . PA07-0340 Game Point Arcade MCUP APN # 921320058 KATIE LECOMTE A Minor Conditional Use Permit for an 12,000 square foot video arcade facility, Game Point Arcade. The facility proposes to employ 6 people including one security guard, and proposes to be open Mon-Fri. from 10 AM to 8 PM. Approximately 200 arcade game machines are proposed to be housed within the existing building which is located at 27468 Ynez Road (APN: 921-320-058). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 12/19/2007 . PA07-0342 Temecula Elks PC&N APN # 921040006 ERIC JONES A Public Convenience or Necessity Application to accompany an existing Minor Conditonal Use Permit aplication (PA07.0082) for the Temecula Valley Elks located at 28061 Diaz Road. The Elks will utilize 3,000 square feet of a 30,000 square foot one story building. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 12/27/2007 . PA08-0001 Hana Sushi APN # 921320041 DANA SCHUMA A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow for the incidental sale of alcoholic beverages at an existing restaurant (Hana Sushi) located at 27576 Ynez Road in the Temecula Town Center. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 1/3/2008 4of5 Planning Agenda Report 11-01-2007 through 12-31-2007 PA08-0004 Verizon Wireless CUP APN # 953390002 BETSY LOWREY A Conditional Use PermiUAntenna Facility Application for Verizon Wireless to remove an existing monpine antenna tower and replace with an upgraded monopine antenna tower and co-locate additional antennas located on an existing water tower site owned by Rancho California Water District, generally located on the east side of Meadows Parkway approximately 1000 feet north of Rancho California Road [APN 953-390-002]. This project relates to previously processed cell tower planning applications PA04-0264 and PA05-0063. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date No Hearing Planned 1/7/2008 PA08-0005 2008 SPRING ROD RUN APN # 922035001 KNUTE NOLAND A Major Temporary Use Permit for the 2008 Spring Rod Run to be held in Old Town Temecula on March 7 and 8, 2008. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Administrators Hearing 1/9/2008 311/2008 5 of 5 ~ c o ~ ~ o ~ Legend Planning Status - Nov/Oec 2007 o 1. Recently Approved o 2. Scheduled for Hearing . 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting e ) ( ITEM NO. 19 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Economic Development Department Reports for the months of November and December 2007 PREPARED BY: Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the recent highlights for the Economic Development Department for the months of November and December 2007. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEADS On November 20th staff met with Michel Knight regarding developing a 40,000 square-foot entertainment center (20 lane bowling alley and party center). In addition, Mr. Knight is proposing to convert the former 24 Hour Fitness gym off Ynez Road into a 20,000 square-foot fun spot called Game Point which will include 250 arcade games and rides for young children. Mr. Knight has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CU P) which is being processed by Planning staff. Staff met with Chris Jicha of the Staubach Company on November 14th regarding site locations for a hotel. Former Dallas Cowboys' quarterback Roger Staubach founded the company in 1977 which provides real estate advisory services to office, retail, and industrial tenants. Its services include site selection, acquisition, and disposition; construction consultation and management; portfolio management; and financing. The Staubach Company has nearly 70 offices throughout the US. Staff provided demographic and business information on Temecula and also provided several available sites for hotel/use. In December, staff provided demographic and business information to Forest City Commercial Group to present to a potential upscale restaurant so that they may consider a location at the Promenade Mall. NEW BUSINESS Mercedes-Benz of Temecula, the first high-end auto dealership, is expected to begin construction in August 2008 and plans to open in mid-2009. The dealership will be located on 13 acres off Ynez Road just north of Date Street. Fletcher Jones Motorcars will be opening and operating up this dealership. BUSINESS RETENTION On November 28'h, staff and Alice Sullivan, Temecula Chamber CEO, met with Gene Burkhart, Sr. Vice President/COO and Tom Hornish of the Outdoor Channel. The site visit included a tour of their facility. The Outdoor Channel has 115 employees company wide and has sales offices in Los Angeles, New York, Chicago and Denver. They currently occupy 24,000 sq. ft. in their new building and they have the option to occupy 43,000 sq. ft. at built out. The Outdoor Channel also owns the 32,000 sq. ft. building across the street. OUTREACH MATERIALSIMEDIA Staff prepared the articles for the December and January issues of the Temecula Chamber newsletter. The December article highlighted the new online Business License renewal process and City of Temecula's holiday events. The January article featured the 2008 City Council and the Mayor's priorities for the year highlighting various developments and programs. The articles were also submitted to The Valley Business Journal for publication. Staff is working with a graphic artist on the design for the new City Cultural Arts Banners which will be displayed along Winchester and Rancho California Roads. EVENTS Staff worked with the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) on the "What's Developing?" Bus Tour - Fall 2007, which occurred on November 9'h The bus tour included a tour of Dos Logos in Corona, Lake Elsinore and Old Town Temecula. The City hosted a dessert reception at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater and staff provided a walking tour of Old Town. On November 14'h, Mayor Washington, Mayor Pro Tem Naggar, Council Member Edwards and staff attended the Promenade Mall's Groundbreaking Ceremony for their expansion. The expansion will include Pottery Barn, Williams-Sonoma, Coldwater Creek, Chico's, White HouselBlack Market, The Walking Company and Yard House restaurant. The expansion is expected to be finished by Spring 2009. On December 6th, Mayor Washington, Council Member Edwards and staff metto discuss a Gospel & Arts Festival event proposed to be held in Old Town Temecula on September 27, 2008. The event will include a temporary street closure of Main Street between Old Town Front Street and the east side of the Children's Museum driveway entrance. MEETINGS November Meetings On November 5'h, staff attended the Education & Workforce Development Regional Committee Meeting at Abbott. David Blake, Human Resources Manager of Abbott, is the committee chair. The committee is working on a strategy for youth engagement. Summer internships at Abbott were discussed. This committee is part of the Riverside County Workforce Development Board, which meets every two months. On November 14'h, staff met internally to discuss existing City filming policies as they relate to our relationship with the Inland Empire Film Commission. Also discussed were issues such as intermittent traffic stops, road closures and fees for police and fire personnel. Staff met with Mark Heisterkamp of InfoUSA on November 15th. Over 100,000 National and Government Agencies utilize the InfoUSA consumer and business databases. InfoUSA use this information for strategic planning, critical analysis, and to meet government compliance requirements. On November 16'h, staff met with representatives of Mt. San Jacinto College (MSJC) regarding their expansion in Temecula. MSJC has secured 40,000 sq. ft. of classroom space in Temecula and they propose to partner with Cal State University San Marcos on classroom space and matriculation of programs. On November 26'h, staff held a post event meeting with P & R Foundation, organizers for the 2007 Fall Rod Run. The car show went very well and P & R Foundation are planning for the 2008 Spring Rod Run. On November 28'h, staff attended the Southwest California Economic Alliance Partners Meeting. Items discussed included: The second Virtual Job Fair will be held in March 2008, three industry specific newsletters (biotech, aerospace, and manufacturing) will be developed, Alliance web site will be updated with new information and will include the cities of Menifee and Sun City, regional commercial broker bus tour planned for April (similar to NAIOP format), a commercial broker lunch is planned for February and several sites are being considered. In December, staff met internally to discuss the Summer Youth Employment Programs in Temecula which will be headed up by Mayor Pro Tem Naggar. Staff is arranging a meeting in January to bring various groups connected with youth employment, internships and job fairs together to coordinate efforts in providing local Youth Employment Programs. This meeting will provide a forum to collect good information, leverage and consolidate resources. This will also tie in with the Temecula Youth Master Plan Strategies. The Temecula City Council is committed to bring additional higher education learning opportunities to Temecula. During the months of November and December, members of the Education subcommittee and staff met with several four-year colleges regarding a future presence in Temecula. December Meetings Staff attended the Partners in Education Committee Meeting atthe Temecula Valley Chamber on December 3'd The Youth Job Fair was discussed. On December 5'h, staff met with Dennis Ferguson, Chair of the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau (TVCVB). Ferguson shared with City staff the results of the branding campaign for the TVCVB that will come out in Spring 2008. The TVCVB is meeting with elected officials, city staff, and business leaders to get feedback on their new branding identity. The TVCVB hopes to have the City, Temecula businesses and organizations to incorporate this branding identity in their marketing, advertising, events, and infrastructure projects. Based on initial work accomplished by Dan Stephenson of the Rancon Group, a meeting was conducted by members of the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association ~TVWA) to develop a TVWA perspective on the vision of Wine Country by 2020. On December 5' , Mayor Washington and staff attended the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association Wine Country 2020 Meeting at South Coast Winery. An overview of the Wine Country 2020 Project was presented by Ray Falkner. The Winegrowers are developing a framework and plan on where they are going in the next 20 years. Mayor Washington stated that the City of Temecula continues to provide support to the Winegrowers Association and their project. Supervisor Stone and several members of the County staff were on hand to address infrastructure issues that were identified as viewed as an important part of their plan. On December 7'h, MayorWashington, staff, and representatives from the Temecula Valley Chamber and Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau interviewed consultants to develop the City of Temecula Economic Development Strategic Plan. On December 17th, staff attended the Southwest Legislative Council Meeting in Murrieta. There was discussion on the Southwest Legislative Council's 2008 Policy Platform and 2008 Propositions on the ballot. Staff met with event organizers of the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival and the Inland Empire Film Commission on the Temecula Valley Youth Film Festival and Youth Film Camp. There are several Youth Festivals, one put on by the Film & Music Festival and the other put on by the Temecula Community Services Department. The Temecula Community Services Department's Cultural Arts Division is announcing changes to the Temecula Youth Film Festival. The changes were made to create a more comprehensive Festival for ouryouth, and to form a new and innovative partnership with the Temecula Valley International Film and Music Festival. The Festival will be named the Temecula Youth Media Arts Festival which will now include a variety of media arts in the future. The plan is to add categories for video gaming, web page and site design, logo design, and computer generated music production. The Festival date will now be held on September 19 and 20 at the Old Town Temecula Community Theater. The deadline for submissions has been moved to June 30, 2008. The Youth Media Arts Festival will follow the same time line as the Temecula Valley International Film & Music Festival. Staff reviewed the draft of the Interregional Partnership Resident Survey produced by Godbe Research & Analysis for the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Interregional commuters who live in Riverside Co. but work outside the county are being polled. The data they have now is that interregional commuters represent about 20% of the adult population in Riverside County. While WRCOG has commissioned a commuter survey for the region, the CityofTemecula will partner on this effort and will be able to ask "Temecula specific" questions in this survey at a pro rata nominal fee which has been included in the Economic Development budget. This will allow us to receive current statistics on how many Temecula residents are commuting to work outside of the area without commissioning our own survey. The last commuting survey the City of Temecula commissioned was in 1997 -1998. Staff provided comments for the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Strategic Planning Focus Group Session. The Chamber has retained SMG Strategic Marketing Group to develop their Strategic Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Activities Report (November & December) Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau Activities Report (November) Southwest California Economic Alliance Activities Report (November) ~cu . y, BER COMWtERCE 'LEADINGTHfWAY' 26790 Ynez Court Suite A, Temecu/a, CA 92591 P: 951.676.5090 F: 951.694.0201 www.temecula.org infa@temecu/a.alg November 7, 2007 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the October Monthly Activity Report as per our contract with the City of Temecula. Chamber staff assisted businesses interested in relocating to Temecula. Chamber Activities at a glance: The Chamber has unveiled its new Chamber website and we have received many positive remarks. The City of Temecula is linked as a partner on the homepage. Enclosed is a status report on how many folks are viewing the new site. The Chamber board of directors addressed the City Council applauding their efforts within the city and the Old Town area. Chamber staff will continue to work with Old Town Temecula Business Association in their efforts to market Old Town in a positive manner. The Chamber will be working on their 3 year Strategic Plan and will be soliciting input from various local representatives. Business Development Resource Committee: The Chamber Spotlight winner for October was The UPS Store at 27475 Ynez Road. The Mystery Shopper winner was La Cocina Bar & Grill and Volunteer Businesses of the Month, chosen by the Membership Committee, were Promotional Experience and Republic Mortgage.The Business Success Forum was on Tuesday, October 9. The topic of discussion was "How to Develop a Business Plan." A Partner In Learning program received a 5,000 donation from the former owners of Hudson RCI. Membership & Marketing Committee: 24 businesses joined the Chamber in the month of October and 60 renewed their membership. Staff and Ambassadors attended 7 Ribbon Cutting events in October. The Networking Breakfast, held at BJ's Restaurant, was attended by 65 members and guests. The November Mixer will be hosted by Barley & Hops Olde World Tavern. 34 members participated in the October - 5 Minute Networking event held at Wiens Family Cellars. The inaugural TVCC Business Women Advocates event was a huge success and was attended by 150 guests and 22 exhibitors. Additional welcome visits were made to new businesses by Chamber CEO, staff and Ambassadors. Southwest California Legislative Council: In October, Randall Newdeck with the Bay Delta Imported Water Supply Program presented the SWCLC with the critical issues facing California's water supply. Approximately two-thirds of all Californians - an estimated 23 million people - obtain at least some of their water from the Delta. This means the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta is the single largest source of California's water. CALFED's Water Quality Program Objective is to invest in projects that improve the state's water quality from source to tap. The Governor's Delta Vision Blue Ribbon Task Force is working to formulate a new, sustainable vision for the Delta. A major court ruling has called for changes in the way the state and federai water projects are operated to protect Delta smelt, and legislation and bond measures to fix the Delta and improve the state's water supply are being debated in the Legislature. Propositions 91, 92 an 93 have qualified for the February 2008 Primary Election and a High- speed Passenger Train bond has qualified for the November 2008 General Election Ballot. Special Events Committee: The 2007 Business & Technology Expo was held on Wednesday, October 17,2007 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. 55 businesses showcased their products or services at the event to over 200 attendees. The Chamber offered a grand prize drawing of a free trip to China to an attendee that evening. The Chamber is currently in the process of coordinating the 2008 Annual Awards Gala which will be held on Saturday, February 23, 2008 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. City/Chamber Retention Visits: Alice Sullivan, President/CEO attended the International Rectifier retention visit with City staff. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distributors) Activity Report: . 90 Visitor Guides, Tourism Maps, & Street Maps were given to Vicki Puterbaugh for a National Reai Estate Organization coming to Temecula. . 100 Tourism Maps were given to Temecula Creek Inn for a large group staying at the hotel. . 25 Visitor Guides, Winery Brochures, Tourism Maps, Street Maps and Pechanga Brochures were given to Boston Scientific for relocation packets for prospective doctors. . 60 Winery Brochures were given to Travis meeting Management. Also, attached are the meeting minutes for the Business Development Resource, Special Events, Southwest Legislative Council, and Membership committees. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (951) 676-5090 or e-mail asullivan(Q)temecula.orq. Thank you. "' Alice Sullivan, 10M President/CEO cc: Mayor Chuck Washington Mayor Pro Tern Mike Naggar Councilman Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Comerchero Shawn Nelson, City Manager Councilwoman Maryann Edwards Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager TVCC Board of Directors Aaron Adam, Assistant City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator Bob Johnson, Assistant City ManagerlCD Director Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Monthly Activity Report October 2007 Chamber Yea....To-Date PHONE CALLS This Month Total TOURISM Tourism Referrals 309 2,753 Calendar of Events 278 1,777 Special Events 233 2,111 General Information 1,221 18,197 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,041 24,838 Relocation 233 1,428 Demographics 210 1,459 Chamber 876 7,570 Miscellaneous 704 5,810 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,023 41,105 WALK-INS Tourism 167 1,807 Calendar of Events 140 1,186 Special Events 178 1,090 General Information 1,089 14,788 Relocation 204 1,540 Demographics 199 1,331 Chamber 532 5,726 Miscellaneous 502 4,168 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,011 31,636 MAILINGS Tourism 1,488 12,394 Relocation 79 1,797 Demographics 203 1,178 TOTAL MAILINGS 1,770 15,369 E-MAIL Tourism 94 785 Relocation 92 690 Miscellaneous 263 2,169 TOTAL E-MAIL 449 3,644 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 16,223 165,891 GRAND TOTALS This Month Year-To-Date PHONE CALLS 4,064 32,894 WALK-INS 3,011 25,257 MAILINGS 1,770 15,369 E-MAIL 449 2,812 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 16,223 96,726 Annual Volume Comparisons Chamber Chamber Percentage October 2006 October 2007 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 218 309 99% Calendar of Events 126 278 91% Special Events 167 233 143% General Information 712 1,221 163% TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 1,223 2,041 141% Relocation 132 233 188% Demographics 117 210 162% Chamber 517 876 166% Miscellaneous 285 704 246% TOTAL PHONE CALLS 1,051 2,023 190% WALK-INS Tourism 138 167 107% Calendar of Events 112 140 116% Special Events 88 178 178% General Information 690 1,089 143% Relocation 129 204 153% Demographics 96 199 179% Chamber 408 532 116% Miscellaneous 308 502 138% Visitor Center Walk-Ins TOTAL WALK-INS 1,969 3,011 137% MAILINGS Tourism 1,570 1,488 4% Relocation 19 79 626% Demographics 22 203 795% TOTAL MAILINGS 1,611 1,770 220/0 E-MAIL Tourism 98 94 82% Relocation 66 92 333% Miscellaneous 166 263 231% TOTAL E-MAIL 330 449 116% WEBSITE USER SESSIONS 5,881 16,223 299% * Chamber referrals reflect faxes, walk-ins and phone calls Membership Meeting Minutes Wednesday, October 10, 2007 - 8:00a.m. -9:00a.m. Chamber Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Mission Statement: Develop programs to maintain and build a membership commensurate with the growth of the Temecula business community and simultaneous growth of the Chamber. Serve as goodwill representative and strive to enhance the value of membership encouraging ongoing dialogue between members. Committee Chair: Dan Brunell Board Liaisons: Tony Berardino Co-Chairs: Jann Gentry Adam Ruiz Julie Ngo Committee Present: Dan Brunell, Adam Ruiz, Jann Gentry, Michelle Deskin, Judy Remsen, David Paget, Jami McNees, Scott Crane, Nathan Garn, Jackie Steed. Staff Present: Kimberly Freize-Uhler, Katie Edmonds and Alice Sullivan. Minutes Committee Chair called the meeting to order at 8:04a.m. Self-introductions of the committee followed. The minutes of the previous meeting were reviewed and motioned for approval by Jami McNees and seconded by Judy Remsen, which carried. Miscellaneous Open Discussion by Committee: Brunell announced that nomination forms for citizen of the year, business of the year and non- profit/charitable organization are available to fill out as the chamber is in need of more nominees. It was stated there are many companies and individuals within the chamber deserving of winning. Brunell also mentioned the upcoming Women in Business seminar. Linda Wunderlich placed a full page add in The Valley Business Journal on the chamber's women in business event. 6S attendees have signed up and the chamber's goal is 150. Expo opportunities are available and the price of the booth was discussed. Linda Bradley will be a panelist and it should be a wonderful event. This event will be open to members and non-members. Networkina Breakfast. Networkina Luncheon. Mixers and 5 Minute Networkina: By Adam Ruiz: Ruiz announced the next Networking Breakfast will be October 24th. The dates have been confirmed and the location will be BJ's Restaurant for 2008. We will not be meeting in November or December. Spotlight and Breakfast sponsorships are available. The next Networking Luncheon will be Tuesday, October 16th. Seats are still available. Ruiz reported we need more sign-ups for 5 Minute Networking. The event will be held at Wiens Family Cellars. We had 40 attendees at the last event. Sub-Committee Reports Ambassador Pro~ram: By Jann Gentry: Gentry reported we have ribbons for new members and guests to wear at networking events. She discussed we should make a point to seek out new members and make sure they get paired with an ambassador if they desire. Ambassadors should make themselves available to the members. We will have one more ambassador training for the year and each ambassador will sign a commitment form that will be good until the end of 2008. An ambassador contest was discussed and Jann will be sending out the information. Welcome & Retention: By Jackie Steed: Steed reported the welcome committee is making their scheduled calls to the new members and that the l't and 3'd month calls are going good although the 7th and 8th month calls are a little more difficult. The committee is keeping on track by sending out emails to make sure the calls are getting made and Julie Ngo has set up an excel spreadsheet listing all new members. It was mentioned the committee has called and left messages for the new members but they are not returning the calls. The RFPs were sent out for Member Appreciation Night. Michelle Deskin has agreed to call the florists. The time has been adjusted for the event and will now be 5-7:30pm. It was announced that the chamber needs volunteers, Judy Remsen and Jackie Steed agreed to help. Last year was a great event! HosDital ReDort: By Scott Crane: Crane reported the proposed hospital is on track but is still in the approval process and the progress has remained the same. The project should be getting started in the 1" quarter of next year. Crane also reported that the hospitals have been very busy. The new expansion at Inland Valley hospital is being used and is full of patients and the expansion at Rancho Springs Medical Center should be completed by summer 2008. Rancho Springs is a little messy right now but upon completion it will be a great facility. City of Temecula ReDort: By Alice Sullivan: Sullivan reported a new residential study was put out and it had a great review as 91% of the community is happy with services provided by the city. A Mercedes car dealership will be built near the homes in the Harveston housing tract, however there may be some opposition from nearby residents. The Mercedes dealership will host an informative workshop for residents. The proposed water park was discussed. It will be open 4-5 months out of the year. The water park has been delayed due to challenges being addressed. The location of the water park and the Mercedes car dealership was discussed. The state of the Pechanga referendum was discussed. The Southwest California Legislative Council as well as the Chamber approves. This will bring revenue to the Temecula community. Pechanga has been a great community partner and a supporter of the Chamber and the Convention and Visitor's Bureau. Temecula residents have put up booths at local stores asking for signatures to oppose the referendum. The Old Town Temecula merchants are discussing forming a second Merchant Association group. Mixer: By Staff: The next mixer will be held November 14th and will be the last mixer of the year. Board ReDort: By Alice Sullivan: Sullivan thanked the committee for attending the meeting to change the bylaws. It was noted vendors are needed for the Business & Technology Expo. Last year 90 tables were sold and this year 40 have been sold so far. The Chamber has done a lot of advertising for the event. Brunell announced the Chamber has received a new Chairman's Elite member, Rancho Ford. Mission Oaks National Bank may be a candidate for Chairman's Elite. Kaiser Permanente has stated that they will participate in the 1VCe. ODen Discussion: Sullivan reported the Women's event will be taking place October 30th at the Old Town Theater and will be a great venue. The New Member Reception will be November 1st. The last Power Networking Workshop was great. Thank you to the panelists for participating! The next Business Success Forum, November 13th will be put on by the SBDe. It was announced that 120 individuals have signed up for the trip to China. Meeting adjourned: 8:56am - Thank you for your attendance. t~ER l.filtVlNG mE WAY" Business Development Resource Committee MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, October 17, @ 8:00am TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Committee Chair: Ginny Mulhern (present) Co-Chair: Barak Berlin (present) Board Liaison: Bill Seltzer (present) & Karen Roberts (not present) Members Present: Lisa Fuess, Chad Hensley Staff Present: Emily Pulley ADDroval of Minutes August minute approved. September minutes approved. Member Recoanition Proaram for SeDtember Volunteer Businesses of the Month - SWCLC Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Norma Arias-Lee Ca lIa Day Spa Serena Meng TMG Communications Amber Starbuck Spotlight Frankie's Steak & Seafood Franco Vessia 41789 Nicole Lane, Ste 1 Temecula 92591 Mystery Shopper Business Success Forum October's topic was "how to write a business plan." November 13 - How to save money on your merchant account -special presentation by the SBDC (11:30am) 2008 SBDC Topics - want same marketing topics as this year 2008 forum topics - Emily will send Ginny & Barak last year's survey for review. Then Emily will send out Zoomrang 2008 Lunch Sponsor -Emily will write 2008 lunch request letter to Costco. And invite Joan to attend January BSF to receive a certificate of recognition. Partners in Learnina The program will now be opened up to members of the Friends of the Temecula Library. 2008 April mixer will be at the Library The widow Allan C. Hudson donated $2500 to Partners In Learning Board UDdate A. Networking Breakfast, Wednesday, October 24, from 7:30 to 9:30am, BJ's Restaurant. B. Business &. Technology Expo - October 17 TONIGHT. Pechanga Ballroom 5-8pm C. Prospecting to Fill the Pipeline - Tuesday, October 23, register @ www.temecula.ora D. TVCC Business Women's Advocates, - Tuesday, October 30, E. Promoting and protecting your #1 Marketing Asset- Your chamber. Friday Nov 30, 9:30- 12pm. $25 per person F. Chamber Trip to China - 9 days all inclusive, $1499, everyone welcome G. Citizen/Business of the Year - Nominations now being accepted H. Bill Seltzer is running for re-election to the board of directors Committee UDdates "Prospecting to Fill the Pipeline" will be canceled if at least 20 RSVP's are not received by Monday at noon. Adjournment Thank you for attending! NEXT MEETING: Wednesday, November 21, at 8:00am Location: TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book TEMECULA// YAIt~EY~BER i"".....!!'-~-"iOF COMMERCE "LEADING THE WAY' Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Special Events Committee Update September 2007 2007 Monte Carlo Extravaoanza This year's Monte Carlo Extravaganza was a great success! We had over 350 guests in attendance. Lisa Fuess with Cutting Edge Staffing was the lucky $1000 grand prize winner. Matthew Cvar was the $500 grand prize winner. Harrah's was the event's Title Sponsor. They helped present a great event which included Las Vegas Showgirls, Mardi Gras beads, playing cards, dice and much more. 2007 LeGislative Summit The 2007 Legislative Summit took place Tuesday, October 2'. at Pechanga Resort & Casino. Dan Walters facilitated the panel discussion between Senator Dennis Hollingsworth, Special Advisor to the Governor, David Crane, Assembly member Kevin Jeffries, Randy Record with Eastern Municipal Water District, Mike Perovich, Cal Trans District Director for San Bernardino and Amy Minniear, President of Pechanga Development Corporation. Dan Walters covered many hot issues with the panelist such as water, energy, transportation, and the tribal compacts with the state. There were over 240 guests in attendance. Business I!r. TechnoloGv EXDo This year's Business & Technology Expo is set to take place Wednesday, October 17th at Pechanga Resort & Casino from 5:00p.m. - 8:00p.m. The event takes the place of our October Mixer. Community Little Book is the events Title Sponsor. Booths are still available for both Member and Non-Member Businesses to purchase. Currently we have sold 34 booths to date. The committee has secured the following speakers for the Tech Expo portion of the event: Kurt Peck - Web Development, Symantec - Web Security, Guy Reams/Conduit Networks - Network Security, and Michelle Deskin/Apples & Jack Rabbits - Data Recovery. The Each seminar will be 20 minute long followed by 5 minutes of question and answers. SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL www.southwestcaliforniaadvocacv.biz Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Lake Elsinore Chamber of Commerce Murrieta Chamber of Commerce October 2007 SWCLC Meetina Minutes Southwest California Legislative Council A Joint Committee of Temecula, Lake Elsinore and Murrieta Chambers of Commerce Meeting Minutes Monday, October 15, 2007 2006 Chair: Joan Sparkman 2007 Chair: Dennis Frank Chamber Advocacy: Jeremy Harris Directors Present: Karen Wikert, Glen Daigle, Dr. Billie Blair, Isaac Lizarraga, Gene Wunderlich, Amy Minniear, Glen Daigle, Carl Johnson Directors Absent: Roger Ziemer, Amber Wiens-Starbuck, Greg Morrison, Scott Crane. Members Present: Jeff Greene-Office of Kevin Jeffries, Kari Reuther-Granite Construction Mindy Zink, Tamara Middlecamp-City of Temecula, Norma Arias-Lee-MWD, Tom Casey-Falibrook Chamber, Tom Rogers-Office of Dennis Hollingsworth, Vickie Carpenter-Menifee Chamber, Sandy Windbigler-PUC, Dave Willmon-League of California Cities Staff: Alice Sullivan, Laura Turnbow, Rex Oliver, Rosalie Roberts Meeting called to order at 12:06pm Chair's Report . Recent Press Releases: Southwest Business Protecting California's Economic Vitality-All three Chambers, Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore joining forces with the Coalition to Protect California's Budget & Economy. Dennis Frank Chairman of SWCLC wants the Business Community to know when it comes to a balanced budget and job creation, we are serious. Southwest California Legislative Council Supporting More Water for Businesses and Region-SWCLC supports the legislation to increase more access to water for the region at its August meeting. This is important to neighboring areas, and for Businesses. Water demand for the region has been growing, due to new development and the population growth. Chambers Prepare for 2008 Initiatives-The three Chambers, Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Eisinore are considering their positions on three propositions that qualified for February and November General 2008 ballots. The Chambers will highlight each proposition that will impact Businesses in the Southwest region. Agenda 1. Approval of September 2007 Minutes-Motion made, seconded and carried. 2. California's Water Crisis There was a presentation from Randall Newdeck-Bay-Delta Imported Water Supply Program Manager, he passed out a brochure on Decisions for the Delta. This has been the worst drought In years. Mr. Newdeck would like to come back to discuss this matter more in November. 3. Legislative Update-Special Legislative Session Presentation by Jeremy M. Harris The Governor called a special session of legislature 2 weeks ago to work on issues on Healthcare and Water. Healthcare-Continue to watch Governor Water-Continue to watch Governor 4. 2008 Statewide Propositions UPDATE Presentation by Jeremy M Harris Recommended Position-None at this time, only information items Proposition 91, 92, 93, are qualified for the February 5, 2008 Primary Election High-Speed Passenger Train Bond (No Number yet) has qualified for November 4, 2008 General Election Ballot. Meeting was adjourned at 1:12pm Next meeting will be Wednesday, November 14, 2007 from 8:00am to 12:00noon BOARD RETREAT At the Murrieta Chamber Office, Suite 15S 41870 Kalmia Street Murrieta, CA 26790 Yael Court Suite A, Temecula, CA 92S9/ P: 95/.676.5090 F: 95/.694.020/ www.temecula.arg info@temecu/a.arg 'LEADING THE WAY' December 12, 2007 Shawn Nelson, City Manager City of T emecu la 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Shawn, Attached please find the November Monthly Activity Report as per our contract with the City of Temecula. Chamber staff assisted 3 businesses interested in relocating to Temecula. Chamber Activities at a glance: The Chamber has unveiled its new Chamber website and we have received many positive remarks. The City of Temecula is linked as a partner on the homepage and we have recently included advertising the Business License link on the front page. The City of Temecula's site is the more popular link being used by viewers. We also have the capability of changing the front page testimonial section. Newly elected officers are: Amy Minniear, Pechanga Development Corporation; Isaac Lizarraga, Rancho Ford; Bill Seltzer, Temecula Golf School; Art Fleming, POI Development; Jeff Kurtz, The Promenade Mall; Janet Beck, Beazer Homes; Roger Ziemer, The Gas Co. and Kelly Daniels, Premiere Marketing. Executive board elections will take place at the December board meeting. TYCe's Chamber board has approved the proposal for Carl Ribaudo of SMG Strategic Planning Group consultant to complete the Chamber's Strategic Plan. The first Strategic Planning Focus session was held on November 29th. Business Development Resource Committee: The Chamber Spotlight winner for November was Frankie's Steak & Seafood. The Mystery Shopper winner was Calla Day Spa and Volunteer Businesses of the Month, chosen by the Southwest California Legislative Council, were Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and TMG Communications.The Business Success Forum was on Tuesday, November 13. The topic of discussion was "How to Save Money Your Merchant Account." Januarv Organization Februarv How to Effectively Network in the Chamber Presented by Laura Bruno Learn tips on time management, following up wilh contacts and staying focused March Marketing You Websile (SBDC) April Advertising Mav Human Resources The topics were set for the 2008 Business Success Forums: June Target Marking (SBDC) Julv Customer Service Auoust Internet Presence, Optimization & Design September Marketing Communications (SBDC) October Accounting/QuickBooks November TBD (SBDC) December Tax Planning Membership & Marketing Committee: 18 businesses joined the Chamber in the month of November and 55 renewed their membership. Staff and Ambassadors attended 7 Ribbon Cutting events in November. They are listed below: . Temecula ACE Hardware . Ridgeview Estates at the Grove . Jazzy Accents Restaurant . Patriot International, LLC . Commerce Bank of Temecula Valley . Temecula Corporate Center . Woman to Woman Health Center The Networking Breakfast was dark due to the Thanksgiving Holiday in November. The November Mixer was hosted by Barley & Hops Olde World Tavern and attended by 300 members and guests. 38 members participated in the l)Iovember - 5 Minute Networking event held at Inn at Churon Winery. Additional welcome visits were made to new businesses by Chamber CEO, staff and Ambassadors. The Membership & Marketing Committee chose the dates and topics for the 4 Small Business Development Center Seminars the will host. They are: 2{6{08 How to Start Your Small Business 5{7{08 Success on the Web 6{24{08 Hiring the Right People 8{26{08 Training Employees Southwest California Legislative Council: In November, the Chamber's Temecula Today newsletter placed area Legislators track record of 58 potential new laws. Stan Harter stated "we increased our working relationship and doubled our efforts in terms of the issues we tracked with our state legislators this past year. Special Events Committee: The Chamber is currently working on finalizing the 2008 Trip to China. We have over 300 community members attending the trip in March. There will be a small business mixer for those members who are interested in doing business with China representatives. The tour will visit Beijing, Shanghai, Suzhou and Hangzhou. The 2007 Awards Gala is set to take place on Saturday, February 23, 2008 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. We currently have over 60 businesses and citizen nominees that will be honored at this year's gala. The committee is currently working on soliciting prize donations for the Silent Auction portion of the gala. The Awards Gala invitations are currently being designed and will be mailed out in January. Reservations are being accepted now. Education Committee: The Partners In Education committee will be working with the Chamber and Education committee to organize the Youth Job Fair this next year. The Student of the Month Program recognized 10 students of the month. Chamber staff organizes the students being nominated for the program each month. Staff attends the monthly event. City/ChamberRetention Visits: Alice Sullivan, President/CEO attended the Outdoor Channel retention visit with City staff. Advertising Campaign: The Chamber has signed up KATY to promote the "Shop Temecula First Program" for the holidays and other chamber events. Tourism Highlights (Bulk brochure distributors) Activity Report: . 60 Visitor Guides, 100 Winery Brochures, 100 Tourism Maps given to Kor Real Estate & Development for Ribbon Cutting . 52 Directories were given to Coldwell Banker for potential clients. . 50 each of Visitor Guides, Winery Brochures, and Tourism maps were given to Alice Lieberman for wedding guests. Also, attached are the meeting minutes for the Business Development Resource, Southwest Legislative Council, and Membership committees. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me at (951) 676-5090 or e-mail asullivan@temecula.ora. Thank you. Sincerely, /7/" \. /~' / Alice sUllb ,10M / President/CEO '" i 1/ "/ cc: Mayor Chuck Washington Mayor Pro Tem Mike Naggar Councilman Ron Roberts Councilman Jeff Comerchero Shawn Nelson, City Manager Councilwoman Maryann Edwards Grant Yates, Deputy City Manager lVCC Board of Directors Aaron Adam, Assistant City Manager Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager/CD Director Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Monthly Activity Report November 2007 Chamber Year-To-Date PHONE CALLS This Month Total TOURISM Tourism Referrals 309 3,062 Calendar of Events 278 2,055 Special Events 233 2,344 General Information 1,221 19,418 TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,041 26,879 Relocation 233 1,661 Demographics 210 1,669 Chamber 876 8,446 Miscellaneous 704 6,514 TOTAL PHONE CALLS 2,023 45,169 WALK-INS Tourism 167 1,974 Calendar of Events 140 1,326 Special Events 178 1,268 General Information 1,089 15,877 Relocation 204 1,744 Demographics 199 1,530 Chamber 532 6,258 Miscellaneous 502 4,670 TOTAL WALK-INS 3,011 34,647 MAILINGS Tourism 268 12,662 Relocation 98 1,895 Demographics 145 1,323 TOTAL MAILINGS 511 15,880 E-MAIL Tourism 123 908 Relocation 98 788 Miscellaneous 278 2,447 TOTAL E-MAIL 499 4,143 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 17,284 183,175 GRAND TOTALS This Month Year-To-Date PHONE CALLS 4,064 32,894 WALK-INS 3,011 25,257 MAILINGS 511 15,880 E-MAIL 499 2,812 WEB PAGE USER SESSIONS 17,284 96,726 Annual Volume Comparisons Chamber Chamber Percentage November 2006 November 2007 PHONE CALLS TOURISM Tourism Referrals 228 309 95% Calendar of Events 99 278 116% Special Events 61 233 390% General Information 2,471 1,221 47% TOTAL TOURISM CALLS 2,8S9 2,041 60% Relocation 50 233 496% Demographics 31 210 610% Chamber 763 876 112% Miscellaneous 497 704 141% TOTAL PHONE CALLS 1,341 2,023 1490/0 WALK-INS Tourism 76 167 193% Calendar of Events 46 140 283% Special Events 98 178 160% General Information 1,269 1,089 78% Relocation 50 204 394% Demographics 24 199 717% Chamber 375 532 126% Miscellaneous 227 502 187% Visitor Center Walk-Ins 36 TOTAL WALK-INS 2,201 3,011 122% MAILINGS Tourism 242 1,488 23% Relocation 19 79 626% Demographics 22 203 795% TOTAL MAILINGS 283 1,770 1240/0 E-MAIL Tourism 58 94 138% Relocation 78 92 282% Miscellaneous 139 263 276% TOTAL E-MAIL 204 449 188% WEBSITE USER SESSIONS 5,881 16,223 299% * Chamber referrals reflect faxes, walk-ins and phone calls TEMECULA// YAJl~f'lI1tMBER l.. 'if".'~.s~ COMM.I!RCE 'LEADING THE WAY' Membership Meeting Minutes Wednesday, November 14, 2007 - 8:00a.m. -9:00a.m. Chamber Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Mission Statement: Develop programs to maintain and build a membership commensurate with the growth of the Temecula business community and simultaneous growth of the Chamber. Serve as goodwill representative and strive to enhance the value of membership encouraging ongoing dialogue between members. Committee Chair: Dan Brunell Board Liaisons: Tony Berardino Co-Chairs: Jann Gentry Adam Ruiz Julie Ngo Committee Present: Dan Brunell, Adam Ruiz, Jann Gentry, Julie Ngo, Tony Berardino, Michelle Deskin, Judy Remsen, David Paget, Jami McNees, Scott Crane, Nathan Garn, Jackie Steed, Roy San Jose, Ross Wilson, Lee McCollum, Melissa Delgado. Staff Present: Kimberly Freize-Uhler and Katie Edmonds. Minutes Committee Chair called the meeting to order at 8:02a.m. Self-introductions of the committee followed. The minutes of the previous meeting were reviewed and motioned for approval by Julie Ngo and seconded by Roy San Jose, which carried. Miscellaneous Open Discussion by Committee: Brunell announced that nomination forms for citizen of the year, business of the year and non- profit/charitable organization are available to fill out as the chamber is in need of more nominees. It was stated there are many companies and individuals within the chamber deserving of winning. The deadline for the nomination forms will be at the end of the week. The Women in Business event was discussed. The chamber was able to launch the event because of all the hard work done by the Membership Committee. We made our budget numbers with the estimated 150 attendees and the 21 expo tables. The chamber has received many phone calls from women that are interested in getting involved and/or participating with upcoming events and the committee as well as thank you letters. The committee is taking input for new ideas for future events. It was stated by Jami McNees that it was a very classy event! Open discussion of the Chamber's 3-5 year strategic plan was announced and many ideas were put before the committee. Some of which include: Friday morning coffee, Increasing the awareness of membership opportunities, Marketing what the Chamber offers, notify members of the free business counseling and seminars put on by the SBDC, Webinars, Customer Service Programs, Tool kit for the members that have been in business for 1,2,3, and 4 years to help their business grow, Q&A with a panel of peers or large employers, seminars geared toward large businesses, Motivational speakers, Blog or Q&A on website, CEO forum/meeting, job posting and testimonials on the website. NetworkinCl Breakfast. NetworkinCl Luncheon. Mixers and 5 Minute NetworkinCl: By Adam Ruiz: Ruiz announced the Networking Breakfast will dark for November and December. Ruiz reported 5 Minute Networking will be dark December and January. A volunteer sign-up sheet for the Power Networking Workshop was circulated. It was reported this event format has changed a little and is now a forum for open discussion. Membership is working on confirming dates and locations for the Networking Luncheons for 2008. Sub-Committee Reports Ambassador Proaram: By Jann Gentry: The next ambassador training will be November 16th and will be the last training for the year. Gentry reported we will have an ambassador contest but not until after the first of the year. The ambassador recommitment forms for 2008 were circulated and 13 ambassadors signed. The ribbon cutting schedule was discussed. The committee asked that staff leave all canceled ribbon cuttings on the calendar and note the cancelation due to confusion in the past. The ambassador socials will continue to be held throughout the coming year. Welcome & Retention: By Julie Ngo: Ngo reported the welcome committee is making their scheduled calls to the new members and that the 4th and 9th month calls have been a little more difficult possibly due to the fires. The members are not as responsive in those months and some phone numbers have already been disconnected and some companies have gone out of business. Ngo announced that she will continue to make the calls for 2008 and will hold a meeting mid-December for all who are interested in participating. The RFPs were sent out for Member Appreciation Night. Ngo and staff will meet to review and approve the food and entertainment. It will be held at the Old Town Theater and should be a great event. HosDital ReDort: By Kimberly Freize-Uhler, Dan Brunell: Brunell/Frieze-Uhler reported the proposed hospital is on track but is still in the approval process. The project should be getting started in the 1st quarter of next year. City of Temecula ReDort: By Julie Ngo, Tony Berardino: The existing farmers market was discussed and it was noted the chamber board supports the organization. At the last city council meeting the farmers market was supported by board members of the Chamber as well as the Convention & Visitor's Bureau and all discussion was kept very positive. The Old Town Merchants Association will be changing their focus from the farmers market and local events to focusing on supporting the merchants and the growth of Old Town. Board ReDort: By Tony Berardino: The votes will be counted and results will be in today for the new board members. Mixer: By Staff: The next mixer will be held tonight, November 14th and will be the last mixer of the year. The Member Appreciation Night will be held in place of the December mixer. ODen Discussion: Freize-Uhler reported the China trip has been a huge success and the flights for the first day have been filled and staff is working on filling flights for the second day. Planning for the 2008 Awards Gala is in full swing. The TYCC has launched the new website. The Boys & Girls Club event will be taking place this Saturday and they are expecting 1200- 1300 attendees. Other Business: The Office Depot 3rd Quarter report was discussed. The percentage has gone up from 2% the last 2 quarters to 2 V2% this quarter. The Sherwin Williams program is doing great and the Chamber will receive a report at the end of the year. Santa is coming to town! He will be Old Town on November 23rd and photos will be available. Meeting adjourned: 9:03am - Thank you for your attendance. TEMECULA VAlLn CHAMBER O)CO'I'1l'(U """"" The Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce is a business Organization of almost t,,400 members representing over 25,000 employees. The Chamber works with city officials, local businesses and the community at large to promote the local economy. NOVEMBER 14. 2007 BOARD PLANNING RETREAT MEETING MINUTES Southwest California Legislative Couucil A Joint Committee of Temecula, Murrieta, and Lake Elsinore Chambers of Commerce November 14, 2007 8:00 am to 12:00pm 2006 Chair: Joan Sparkman (Absent) 2007 Chair: Dennis Frank (Present) Chamber Advocacy: Jeremy Harris (Preseut) Directors Present: Kareu Wikert, Glen Daigle, Greg Morrisou, Carl Johnson, Dr. Billie Blair, Isaac Lizarraga, Amber Starbuck Directors Absent: Joan Sparkman, Ami Minniear, Scott Crane, Gene Wunderlich Members Present: Staff: Kim Cousins- Lake Elsinore; Alice Sullivan & Laura Turnbow - Temecula; Rex Oliver - Murrieta Frank called meeting to order at 8:30 am Agenda I. Call to OrderIW eleome and Introductions 2. Approval of October Minntes. Motion was made, seconded and approved. 3. 2007 SWCLC Attendance Audit. Greg Morrison introduced the audit prepared by Jeremy. It lists members attendance for the past year. We will add language to the operating procedures that will outline what an excused absence is and how that will affect the attendance report. 4. SWCLC Financial Report. Rex Oliver gave a report on the [mancial status of the organization. At the end of the current period we still have revenue. Also gave a report on the plauned outline for showing the level of participation by the supporters of the group. We will also have our web site updated by Jeremy. This has no cost for the SWCLC it is part of the service provided. Greg Morrison asked that EVMWD not be included in the list of contributors. 5. Operating procedures. Jeremy reported on the planned change to the operating procedures with the addition ofWildomar and Menifee. It was decided not to make the changes and we will discuss adding Menifee and Wildomar the following year, with this year being a year of mentorship. Next, removal of the wording regarding a line under composition which states "The Chairman of the Board of Directors of the chamber responsible for the Chair position shall appoint the SWCLC Chair for that year.". Next chauge the wording on page 7 to read SWCLC not Government Affairs. 6. Review of Accomplishment for 2007. Jeremy Harris reviewed our accomplishments for the past year. This included a month by month review of our actions. 7. 2008 Strategic Initiatives Planning. Greg Morrison outlined the planned strategic objectives and it was decided to amend the wording on the reconnnended action. Jeremy will prepare a change and bring it to the next meeting. 10. Election of the Chair was moved in the agenda by request. Motion was made seconded aud passed that Greg Morrison will become the chair for the 2008 year. 9 Assembly Member Kevin Jefferies. Our guest speaker addressed the group and emphasized the importance of what the group does and to keep up the good work. Gave an overview of some of the issues coming in the uew year as relates to the budget, water issues and health care. Adjourn. The next meeting will be Monday December 17, 2008 TEMECU~/ V~tyCll1tM.BER L..!~"",'Si''5F COMMERCE "LEADING THE WAY' Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Special Events Committee Update November 2007 42". Annual Awards Gala Plans are underway for the 42"d Annual Awards Gala. This year's event is set to take place on Saturday, February 23, 2008 at Pechanga Resort & Casino. The save date cards for the event will be mailed out in December. The committee is currently working on securing all of the major sponsors. Community Little Book has agreed to be the event Title Sponsor this year which replaced TransWestern Publishing. A press release announcing all of our 2007 nominees will be sent out in December. An orientation will be held on December 13th for all nominees in which we will review the nomination process and voting procedures. Prizes are now being accepted for the silent auction. The silent auction committee will be meeting on December 6th. Invitations for the gala will be mailed out in January. Reservations are now being accepted. The cost to attend is $125 per person or $1350 for a corporate table of 10 guests. Reservations may be made online at www.temecula.oro. 2008 State of the City Address The first State of the City meeting is scheduled to take place Thursday, December 13th at 8:30a.m. The committee will begin discussing plans for the 2008 event. TEMECU~ VAl1!EY rU:KMBER l<....':"~""jC"~ COMMERCE -I.EAOINO THE WAY' Business Development Resource Committee MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, November 21, @ 8:00am TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book Committee Chair: Ginny Mulhern (not present) Co-Chair: Barak Berlin (present) Board Liaison: Bill Seltzer (not present) & Karen Roberts (not present) Members Present: Lisa Fuess, Adam pflaumer, Michelle Deskin, Laura Bruno, Marvin Gabut, Roy San Jose Staff Present: Emily Pulley Aooroval of Minutes October minute approved. Member Recoanition PrOClram for September Mystery Shopper Kromatic Hair Rick Jaramilio 41785 Nicole Ln Temecuia Golf School Bill Seltzer Volunteer - by the BDR Rancho Ford Chad Hensley Spotlight Bay Alarm Richard Yrigoyen 1920 S Archibald Ave. Unit K Ontario, CA 91761 909-509-7021 Business Success Forum . November 13 - How to save money on your merchant account -special presentation by the SBDC . December 11 - Tax Planning for 2008 . SubCommittee will meet to determine topics for next year. Emily will send out email to all interested with date and time . Emily wrote Costco letter for 2008. Inviting Joan in Jan and asking Costco to again sponsor lunch in 2008 . Committee discussed how to get people more involved. Asked if the Chamber could look into adding more than one email contact per member. Partners in LearninCl No update Board Update A. Power Networking Workshop - Dec 4, 12-1 :30pm, at Chamber, members only B. New Member Reception - Dec 12, 5-7:30pm, Old Town Temecula Comm Theater. C. Promoting and protecting your #1 Marketing Asset- Your chamber. Friday Nov 30, 9:30-12pm. $25 per person Committee Uodates Adjournment Thank you for attending! NEXT MEETING: Wednesday, November 21, at 8:00am Location: TVCC Conference Room Sponsored by Community Little Book November 2007 Highlights PAGE - -- --------------------- ----.- Travel Media Showcase Trade Show and Post FAM Tour ... , \ individually. at a single location, for the purpose of exchanging information and developing personal contacts. We participated in one-on-one appoint- ments with 35 journalists, who consisted of ednors, staff and freelance travel writers, rnagazine and newspaper travel wrners, broadcast travel journal- ists and internet travel journalists. Some of the publications that they write for are: AAA Maga- zine, San Francisco Chronicle, Destination Weddings and Honey- moons, NCGA Magazine, Fairways & Greens Maga- zine, Ventura Star, Santa Cruz Sentinel, Live Well Magazine, Discov- erSD.com, Coast to Coast Magazine, Saveur, Travel World Magazine, Sunset Magazine, Newstalk 920 KPSI, Spa Magazine, The Antique Trader. Better Home and Gardens, Suc- cessful Meetings, Luxury Travel, Group Tour Maga- zine, Small Market Meet- ings, Weslways and Dal- las Morning News. We presented story ideas, press releases and T e- mecula Valley collateral to national media represen. tatives. On November 30 and December 1, the CV8 was invited to participate in a post FAM tour for pre. registered media repre- sentatives. Over the two days, the group of eleven journalists were treated to a glimpse of the beautiful Temecula Valley by stay- ing at the Temecula Creek Inn and partaking in a gourmet wine. pairing din- ner. They also experi- enced the wine.making process with the assis- tance of John MacPher. son, head winemaker at South Coast Winery Re- sort & Spa where they learned some interesting facts about the art of wine. They visited Ponte Family Estate Winery for some wine tasting and then headed into Old Town for some shopping and site seeing. They also were given the grand tour at Pechanga Resort & Ca. sino showing the variety of dining, gaming and entertainment options. Journalists enjoy a visit to Old Town Temeeula. I Journalists enjoying wine tasting at Ponte Family Estate Winery. I I I I J J J I J J J I J J I I I J J J , \ ... From November 27.29, the TVCV8 sponsored a booth at the Eighth Annual Travel Media Showcase at Morongo Casino near Cabazon. This show offered a unique opportu- nity for top travel journalists and travel industry professionals to meet Jim Carter from South Coast Wfnery Resort & Spa enllght. ened the group on the many special features at the Resort. San Diego Bay Wine & Food Classic poured at the event Including wine from nine wineries from the Temecula Valley Wine Coun- try. 30 gourmet food companies and 60 of San Diego's top res- taurants and chefs were on hand to Impress the guests with gourmet cuisine and treats. The average age of visitors were between 30-50 years old and the average household Income ranged between $75,000- $250,000 annually. Staff was pleased to hear that many of the visiting guests were familiar with the Temecula Valley and the unique setting It has to of- fer. Kimberly and Carolyn dazzled the attendees olthe show. 9 wineries from Temeoula Valley Wine Coun~ try helped give great presence at the event. On Saturday, November 17, staff participated for the first time In the San Diego Bay Wine and Food Classic. In attendance were over 5,000 wine and food aficionados and over 160 wineries from wine growing regions from around the world. More than 700 different types of wine were , I ., ~------------------ -- --------, California Travel Research PAGE 2 .... , \ California Hotel Occupancy and Room Rates (October 2007) - California hotel occupancy for the month of October was a ro- bust 71.9%, considerably higher than the U.S. average rate of 66.7%, and exceeding by a slight margin the 2006 level. Average room rates were 6.6% over last year. The Anaheim, Los AngeleslLong Beach and San Jose/Santa Cruz areas reported double. digit RevPAR gains. -Source: Smith Travel Research, CA Lodging Industry Perfonnance, November 2007. Mexican Travel to California, 2006 - California and other border states all struggle with the common dilemma of how to measure and report Mexican visitation. Air arrival estimates are available, thanks to the U.S. Office of Travel and Tourism Industries and their vendor, CIC Research Inc., and these are judged to be statistically sound. Unfortunately, there is no consistent source of data on Mexican land travelers, leaving a huge gap in our understanding of the size and importance of the Mexican market. The San Diego region is probably the California region that benefits most from Mexican tourism, and has undertaken extensive re- . search. At the request of the CTTC, and drawing heavily on the San Diego efforts, CIC Research Inc. has prepared the following California statewide estimates: Mexican land travelers = 7,640,000 (4,570,000 Day Visitors & 3,070,000 Overnight) and Air travel. ers = 470,000 for a total of 8,110,000. -Source: ere Research Inc., November 2007. Strong Canadian Interest in California Travel Confirmed by September Survey - Responses to a recent Canadian survey (online panel of Canadian adu~s 18 and over, representative of Canadian geographic and demographic distribution) indicate that 11 % of online Canadians have visiled Calilomia within the past two years. The percentage jumps to 14% for Alberta residents, and 26% for B.C. Custom questions added by the CTTC to gage the prospect of expanded tourism from Canada show a surprisingly strong potential from Eastem Canada Combining recent past visitors and those expressing likelihood in visiting California in the next few years puts "potential visitors" from Ontario at 32 percent. Most important trip planning research: scenic roads and highways, restaurants and dining, beaches, and shop. ping. -Source: DataPath Systems/Oufferin Research/ZINC Research, October '07. ."",.------ --------- - - - - -.- - - - - / Chairman's Letter (from Tvee January 2007 Newsletter) I Dear Distinguished Members: I As 2007 comes to a close all of us at the Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau are taking time to reflect on what a very successful year it has been. I am personally grateful for the dedication, productivity and passion of our amazing team at the TVCVB. I Their commitment and implementation of our Tourism strategic plan has us well positioned for another exceptional year in 2008. The evidence is clear: I I An Upward Trend - Temecula Valley's hotel occupancies have trended positively in 2007 and have continued to outpace national and state trends. I We've Grown - We successfully recruited two key Manager Positions and expanded a focused Sales and Marketing effort for our I partners and the Tourism community. In all we attended and hosted more than 25 key trade shows and familiarization trips including being a major feature in the prestigious Travel Industry Association's International Pow Wow Tradeshow in April. I Partnerships - The TVCVB launched several new key targeted ma~eting promotions. One of many examples was a new "drive- I marker' program launched in the summer with billboard presence on the 1-10 / 1-215 freeways next to Pechanga representation. Also in partnership with The Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association a colorful banner program was unveiled at the Fashion Valley I Mall. Both of these major initiatives encouraged people to play, stay, taste, shop, golf, dine and explore the Temecula Valley. I Showcasing Temecula - In March we opened the doors to a new interactive visitor's center in Old Town Temecula to display Te- I macula Valley's unique features and amenities to numerous visitors. It also serves to provide reservation services the numerous hotels and restaurants while providing valuable infonnatlon on the many special event and festival offerings in our region. I Educate -In May we presented the Temecula Tourism Impact Study which outlined that Tourism and recreation plays a vital role in I the Temecula regional economy with more than half a billion dollars in visitor spending generated in 2006, a four-fold increase from six years earlier. This positioned tourism as a key player to the economic development viability of our region. I . I We've Grown Again - Our growth moved us to new offices in August, adjoining the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce's of- fices on Ynez Court. Our new headquarter also serves as a second visitor center. I A New Vision. The TVCVB initiated a major branding initiative to achieve strategic positioning and overall brand recognition for I Temecula Tourism. We launched the effort in August with a branding discovery session which was attended by Key Tourism leaders including our Directors and Staff, The City of Temecula, Pechanga, Wine Country, Old Town, and Chamber representatives to name I a few. This initiative and program continues in the 4th quarter of 2007 with anticipated results to be released in early 2008. I Service First - The TVCVB will have serviced well over 75,000 tourism related inquiries by year's end. Our team also will have selVed over 200 media inquiries, marketed to approximately 3.300 event inquiries and represented Temecula in 28 Festivals and I Events. A new high was achieved in all categories. I The Temecula Valley Convention & Visitors Bureau has certainly seen an exceptional year. This would not be possible without the I unWavering support of our tourism partners and the contribution and endless positive energy of the volunteers and the many dedi- cated individuals who serve on our board. Together we do make a difference! Thank you for making it a great year for all of us. I Happy Holidays to all. We .look forward to sharing the prosperity that a new year has to offer with friends and neighbors and making new acquaintances with all that visit our Temecula Valley. I Respectfully, Denis Ferguson I Chainnan of the Board, TVCVB \ *Look for the TVCVB's new Quarterly Newsletter that will keep you up-to-date on regional tourism and CVB happenings _ I ... debuting in March 2008. '" ., ... - - -.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 > () > I- 0 0 !;: 0 .,; -'" CO '" 'in E E E E E E 0 '" D " " " " " " S '" ID '" () () () () () () CO > '" CI> II. '" U ~ " 0 en - ... o c. CI) a: III CI) Cii rJ) .... o o C'II .. CI) .c E CI) > o z c i= ",,," 00 . ~ c. - ",0) UlJ. "'0 0"," '"," Ol - ",," <c'" '" ",;0: .:rC\l ,,-> - ,"0 ::;;~ o ~o 0.' <clll L N.. ,"0 :;;0 ~ '" E '" E '" '" '" '" '" <c o i= a; lJ..u..u.. ILu.. ~ a.c: c: c: c..a: a: 1o.oWWWC;LUW ,!gU::;;::;;::;;U::;;::;; c:: U)Cf){[) wen lJj CI> ~<(gOO<(OO c:CJCOOOCOCOLO 1111-.,...('1')"-1- ..- :i lJj - ..c '" .- <( 0 Z((lO EI-~ o o c: oLOc=a~8 C\/t-C\IM Ol C ~C '" '" -~ElJ)ID c: ~ _ _5 c CD _,u c: > Ct5 E ~.- UJ c: ::J ...J 0 .20 g'f- a: (l)EE g'Q)m 'iJEE '" ., '" '" c c :2::; :J '" 0 0 51-t- .- -- (000 ><!.l<!.l ro roro 0 00 0 o_coC\! $", C\I v.!2 ~ 0) i:O 0) >:.,." C -E c\t ~ ~ o..l?5 ..- .0 Ul ~ co o roo 0,," C en ..... ~-r; ~ O~E ;,:: '" co > o Z ., "5 " '" E '" f- a '" 0)'<: C C 2 c ~Ei5 ~ 0 C'> ~ !!!S~~ .~c. ~<( ffi Q) Q) E ::::l ~CI)'5.::::8<(o E=>(f)E.~sC; E.~c<(Ci5ou.: UlCI)E.~Q) 1-. "CoOw"cU)E"'-! ca x;;::.;::.!!!_.~o Q)lQro..c:ctlQ)~ . ..J<!.lUU>IUl<!.l E '" E t ., c. '" o i':' 1ii 'E '" '" "0 .<: '" ., o ~ ~ (I) ID (I) lJ) ;:: O)...J "C "C m c ~ m "5 E .~'N...J (J) ~ C.9 g co ~~~m.8 en a:: co:.- CD...J"w CI.l r:::2: ~...J ro.- ctl 0 O)Q)--> :2: Q) ga.rocEttl 0- ..c: ~:2:'N.E.E g ~w~~.E ~ .3 ~oocao:= .~ :> c:2: I ctl - ~ >::J 00 ~ "0 EUl:'5<!.lE co:'c c=ooE Eo 0);:) uo~.~.:::e~e.::: C Q) (JJ en - .... - (I) ~ :5 ~ @uCt5 00 ~.:; 2 Ci.i", o ~~ lJ) U) _ (I) a.<DO ........o5-~~~a. (I) .!!;! .E C) Q) C'" ::::l C'" CD 1U~ ::JctlSCI:wC"IDcc c.... g.(j)oQ)a:~C:Q) o"'~ t5a32:2~lJ)~:2 O'lo>> ::J.-U"_::J -5 5.S: 0.0 cuC.9 ::::l-s::l<!) cEQiCl)o-....CJrl""iCJ.... ::::l lJ) - C C 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ..J~~ ~ ~ ~~.g o~'1ii <C..c:u gl1..W5.~.1ii.~5 2:!::: Ca CCS:E.~LO>.>->CO f/)oo3:'OQ).-UCDLO 000 Q)I~COcn5':Q)C\lO>C\lo)(l') .- u ~ CO W O>~"O"O "0 "0 "0 .~ Q)1-><(~oJgJg~~~ .2:: 1ii Q) 0 f.Q (]) I- !:i: !:i:!:i: !:i: !:i: ...... o:!::: > a:l (]) I- :::I :::I :::I :::I ::! c(u IUlf-U::;;Uu..u..u..u..u.. 1 1 1 II! 1 1 1 1 1 o E '" E '" 5 ., Ul .!'; ;0 '" 0 "'.<: "Ul o '" IiiJ ffi~ c.~c o~g u:::l..c:C C u u 0 ccs.$C:~ C'l u.3 u c '" C cn._c.>.::! ~=S~{g..J lI)U.,=>. ca: c: 0 a:l l-aoI;g ..c en:::: 0 a;..cffiCCSI .ccccnCi5w E((l~((lo Cll>Ul>I uu-uo ~fVff ro o o "" .E '" '" o 0) '" '" '" '" '" '" " " '" '6 .8 0) .!'; " '" ::;; '" .0 E '" " '" o Cll U ... o U. .lI:: lI) Cll l- ll) Cll C5 (/) C'.:' l:'):NC\j,lO,l;\j'v .l:'),'C\J9N cor-... "J:: e\i,....:'of'ci,~..oL"i uic\ici ';;;:0 s:: 0 C\J,N,,~..C\JnT""":~ :,:.'....- 'E,~ ,~g 'ii;-., :g:tj ~_~: ~~: 8 ,g{ fri ,:8 E'Q),tp Cl:l;\l a ,co CI') ",~ OO'J7: l"- :~ ..c: c o>~v~''':a:S'rs~cOocitria;:ai: effi ~i!~CI')~CI')0C1')~.~CI')~ 1tI a: ~;;:;: h ..CD I- C3 .....,', ,C\!'C\J C\l-N,(J),mm:-o 0'0 !"":o 0 0,9:09'0:9 oooooco - ~:~~~e\iNe\i~e\ie\ici~ci$cici~dcici:cidci2ciBci~ci ~ ~ 6f E,.... Y F ""',r; T""";: )',', :,;c:,',.::i'7 _~~8~~G: \;~,' 0 J;: l 'W0 Y D j; is ~ CDS> ,~~~Ol.O:Ol.Oom:l.OOl.O,aO~~l.OO~O,l.O-Ol.Ol.Obl.OQO ~'~~~it;~~~~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~~~ ~~UO~~O,l.OOCOOCOOOWOgooo:o>~l.Oocoocooo~ooro ~~~C\JI~*.~:.~"<tfl.O~l.O!"<t~m~.~.l.O.l.Ol.O~I.O~"<t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1+ "- c c ,- S as ~ Cllii) '<'" ." ~ f- 00; :2 'E "'''' aiD ~ 0 .i::i ~ -'l", ~" 000 ~o 0", "E"O 1D~ 1ri 0; o C\ICOC\lNNC\lNC\/NC\I .9!i:ri<<iojo)a)o)mmQ)o-i OJOOCOOCl<X>COroCOOOOO E .. '" " E o o 0: .",if, ~ -""'l.Ol.OlO,lO,IOLOLQI.OLtll.O EE~Sw~~m~:w WID r!I:8 ~'T-:'+='''':~T""-:;;;:''':';''''~''': ~c:: in (II =",::1 ClJIIl " " a~ '0 ~'~'~.~ ~,'~,~ '~,'~ ~ ~.'~ .';3 ~ .'~.~~'~'~. ~ oo-c;) ~.~::! ~:;~::! ~ :;!...::! o Ii. " ~ o " ~ o "'''' olol roro 0>0>0>0>0>0'10>0'10>0'1 <ci<ci<ci<ci<ci<ci<ci<cici:juj 10 10 10101{) IOlO l!)lO lO """ <ci<ci ""n 0'1 0'1('1')('1')('1') C':IC':IC':IC':IC':I <ci<ciolololololola;;ol 10 lOlOlOlO 10.10 lO.1O lO ~ <0,<0, "'li'5"m <O,,~ ~-~'~'~'.~':;:.'.~. ~:;:.~ ~'<O_.''B. ~..~ ~ <<!. ~o:o, <0_ .,...,..,...,........................,-.........,...,..,...,. IOIl)(j)O)(j)O"lO"lO"lmcn .,-.....00.000000 ~ <O,"~ ", ,,_ ,,_ ,,_ ",I"-~ 1'--, ~,.,...,. .'q).1'-- 0 """,:~/'--.,.(').'o"l:).<O.~ .(D'J: -No.ctS NC\i Lri:N Lri.o C'i'NN '.cO :::::I9C')..('I')..ql.('I')...l;\l..C\/C\J.....~,.......('ol.......-~ .ai..~.- ..........'_:. ......: c,.'.:"',',,' li~~~~~~~,;i~J!~i~~i~_~il~~:~j~~~II~~~~i~I~~ E '.'~ gr~'g(\j'.ci.g-gg..~.~,~g:gt -:-,~-f2ffl.~"~ ~.'fi.'i.gfgf~~w ~g ~jf:ffi(\j-~ ~@g'gfgfi: g~~r-..0C\/~C\/~lO~Il)~.,...,.p~p.('I')W~~.0"l9(o~.Cl'I'~(oWIO~(O~OO~(O~('I')~I.O~ cr: 'j::.c.i C'i .'ci .q'''f ~- ~ .q'.~- ..:f';i, ..:f '~- ~r~~ ('I')'ry. C'i ..<j' (f)'ft' C'i1 ('I')'g (f)c\/- 53 ,c? ('I')'t C'it ..:f '''I ~'..i: .q- ..~ /'--.;o::t.Cl'IJ{lo'co:"<t:,",,'('I')l;l>00 ocriolC\icricri<ciNcrioj"-:;f C'\I',' "-''7" "'7'7." '7 ~ci~ ~~.~d6~'~~:~~ 0 'i'7..C}l"7."'.....C\i.......,-...... ..... ......,- ~:~'~~:~.~~~.~,~~ ~..~.C}l'<.l\~.C?'7.,..~-:u;>:'J? co'C\/..C!:J 1"':'.'~ ......~.I'--_C\lOO,C\IC\1 1li<ci..,fo<ci:iQr-.: . ~ o ci~ 2~~re3g~~~~~.~~~~~g~~~ ~,_~~'~~J~ ~~-.:ri.~~;~~~, ~....~..:'~~.~6 IOm('l')('I')('I')ro('l')~('I')~ro~('I')~C'\Iw('l')~('I')n"<t 0::1';':'::-" .:,<':_C?: 0::1' "'''' "'''' a.'.... .....'.... "'"' '" d..dd~r~,~...~'~.~.~...~ ~ 10 iO.OO> 0 0;' 0 '0>0) 60):6 ....<O.C\11"-" I"-,r-......:r-..r.,...,.r-...o> o::I'(?C\I,c>>.C\I.lj)'C\Ip>.O>'..C\jO'lcn ai'o 1.0" N ....:;..N ....:;.N C\/-......~ Nt? ~iO.q to'lO 1Ol!)1O'1.O 10:1.0 r- IO' 10 00 ;C'co<ci Q..-...... ~..~~:~.q 'i)-Z;st.:C":! !=C'~,l$& o :2 b ....OI.O(ry(l') (0/'--(00)10 ~'~_a:i:h:i-r! i~'~,~"'.~ :d-~ ':S~'~ r-C\I.,...,...-"...,,'........:..-....... 0>...:<t:0) ..joool "".1'. , ~.<O,.....O ('I') ~~ g_~..,f "'~ oloi ~ ..$' ~~r :g,~ g:'~:' ~$' ~ ..~.'. ~ r-.:-C\jr-.:-l:\ici.~.....::Ili_-ico..td-:;f OOCl;)_OO:Q'I'.Cl'II;l)_O>COOO~-(o:W.r-.. aiC\l'o:l. ~.O>co triLriiri- "",I'--,lO l:\I..~~,C\I_aJ.q-~,o ,;C CJir-.:cr:i,ocri o:i.Q:i. ci (,) ",.', ,...',...........,..,'..:..: .":..<:."- ;~'.~'i';/"'- i':,>, ,r:r:,i,;;'CO(l') f;.;.'O>:<t.lOiiJ;m E:ftIlp:C\/p:roo'..(fJ:"_p::>.q 'g .~.~' ~ .'~" g:~ g ".$1." g c::ii)~"'''''''C'''''''.'0'.'''-T''''' ":2 ~ C\/,""OO.o C":im"':a:i Mmoo o;i;;;r-.: ,"';" , .....~_O......lO~~~......~('I')~(O~:I.O:~C\I~ ~~~~~&~#~~Lri~C'i~ol~Lrici~~ ~ 1000,1"- 0>.00'1 N"'-O>~ cn.'.({):'(O LriQ:C'ic<:iONO ;::"::;'::::.'.::::::p)'~ ,. ... r'-.'ll)-OO "'C\I.<O CD.('I')(:l 0>(1) ~.o......CXlI'--"C\I_CDl!)'" ~~~~~~~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~: .ooo.oooo.ooo.oo,ooop.....~oo:......o .....=.....~.....~......~-=.............._.......-........-....._.....~ o Ben g-~ ftI.c-., 0J:.q :::::I Ja 0) Lri ..c:u'.~j'.r-.. ~ 9;! ~ '" (J1 '7 a: 0'" -:iN ~,'lit'0::I' ~t:::r! '" 0; " '" .,; " " oj " ...'" ~.~ 1000......-0 (0 Nmr-.:~ci I"-W 1'--00 I'-- ..-Cil"- o-ii:Ou:i 1'--/,:-'1'-- 0.0..... ci.Qj.cri 1"-.1"-'" "'''' ~~ ~ . . . c .~ Z .. ffi.ffi'la:- ~.' ,ffi~'la ffi!;: o .~ ~, ...... .....E ffi ..........0.0 ~,~ ~_ '.' .....E ffi ...........0.0 ~ .'~ jij'" .... ..... Effie :5.Ctl:::l..c. .....~lll'O.. ~..~_ Ctl:J..c .' ..........~Q)..o'-~~_Ctl2..c. .......' ~ Q).o lD ~..o g~ "~ ~.>o en15..8o >0 J9~ l:i g'E '.'~ ~>o en,15..8C_ > '0 J9~.og~ .~ ~ '>0 0115..81: G:l Q)'U c. :JS :::I.lll 0'" OQ) 0 Ctl Q)'U c..u :JS:JQ) 0'" O,Q) 0 Ctl 0>'" C. 'U :J ,'5 :::10> 0.-:::::1 , lL ':2:.<(.'~."""')"""') <( 00.0 >-z 0 1-:") I.L .~..<(::E"""') """').<(.'.(f) O..),o.ZOI-.'7..lL ~,.<(',':2:',"""')'7 <(00 0 ,0 . " . .. 00 . " . o 00 ; 1o1O 1.6' lOiO'minlO tolO).Q'IO.'Jj Q) .0 .00'.0 0'00 a-coo 0 0 >000000.0.00.0.000 C\lC\/'C\/C\/C\IC\1C\1C\1.C\1 C\I NC\lC\I ". "', ~g8g88888~818~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 090000000000.09.09.0000000.000 C'\IW'C\IC\/C\IC\1C\1~C\/~C\/NC\lC\lC'\I~-C\IC\1C\1C\1C\1C\1C\1~C\IN .~ 0 ~o ~o Z ~N .0 0 x . . . x . . . . . '" .~ . . . . X X . X . . 2 " . . . . . . Xl< . . ~ , . . x . . X X.')< . . , . . x . x . X-l< . . " :>< . ~ . . . x . . " . >C x x . . . . x " X ><'.- . . . . . . . ~ ~ . . x x . . . x lii , . . ;:i< )ex . . . . 0 . .. . ><.X x . . . z x . . . X )c>< . 0 x . " . .~ x.)( . '" . . <')( . x x; Xi:>! . " ~x . X . . >ex . , X X: X . . . >c.x . , . . . . . X,')( . " . . X . . . X X " . . " X . . X X )( l<:';- X )eX . . . ~ . . . . . . , . . . . . X 0 . . . . . . . . . z . . "X . X >(>< . 0 X . X X;>< X '" )< ><)< . X . . " " X X . X K'x X X , X xi X . X )(::.')< . . X X X X 'clIo( ><:: xix . >C"; " X X ~ >c.:;.;.; . X . X: X >C-,.)( X X X X :lEi: '>( X::X . . . . ~ >('lo< . X X X , X XiX . X X X Jh _ lll~ 0" ~ ~~ e ~~ f;;; 0 ~ :S ifi ~ .~ ~ e ~ t/) '" ",' {O)'iVi 0.,....0..- vlD.r--.OI gmg~ (\I-....,.<.'\IN i'j' ~ 5l C;N g; ~~ ~O!l :H!ll ~ "- :;:-0- U"l."." S.!!!. <(,<(<(,<C: <( () () 00 () ..ilitici ~_""53"5 '0.0:',0. <.) QI III _,<II <Il ,E EE E Q1W"'QlQ) hI-obI- ~ ~....~~-~ 0.<>'.00:0 W<II:Ill,I!l-:Ql EE,E EE <lI <0.<11 <D:1l> :hl-,}",_I-.h ci;(,jci:tu :>,3.3-'5 0_:"" 0'0 lll_lIl. Ql-m EE. E,E ~:~~..'~ 1..::1 ~.';~ ~-ir1 ~ ~gtE._g '3 >-Ew-efl) ~j=lr~'~ [jl,liig?::gj~ '" e-gEE'5: c ~ {!!.w "'Ip ~Q) &l;"~'~'..~:.g ~ :5..~CI)_F"71- oo-,':ol:l:-a:l,Cl ~'fTI 2_.~W -'W-,"::!(/.! go~_~9 a5'E'-'!o E" 1il . ~ I ~ ;~ ~ ~~: ~-~ c E llJ .~. ,'ai'.$! ~.~ ~ GI c-"'5."""'lil r;;:-g-mig ~~_1! E.;~g~,:; =~ ge Qjr- 0..... '5l - 5 E II> '3 -"';m E:{!!. -0 ~ w ;::. :s~ 8 ~_ ~~L2 ~ "~' ~i:_,,:r:~ &. ~ it~ E:~: ~,'~:5 ~g ~'.g,~ m~ &',:? w. 2:>..!: ,~:9 :::;:ctl -- '-,:>; lii iil '0 ',,:2 :is:ctl ~-:iS-: 16,0:, ~ ",~' ~ S ..c:3 CD,g ~"~'ijj~: E,(O m~ Ww, ~_o E:m_'C :;:1,,03 0l'Qj ~_,!: ~,"Ca..'..c: Ill,a: :iS~ 0:>. 1-15 CI::,' - ~'5 Z"m" <Il ,:!; 0 - ~c ~ -2 . m -~~- E 8:r: w 0 . 'gci co.;c. CO O('J~g~ o::(\igj'~'~ . I- ""_ '" ,..-'-',T"" Ol<:\l,t;,: :;::t!g~(iIj ~~-~~~ (0 ('J,t'J V co<nO)<:\l (oO~T"" ,~,<n,(O'co CiI<:\l,C\I,N r--'(Or--,,"<t r--OC\l'CO <nco'O) (0 f;J.TII;'TII;:2 ~ . o ~a: .~ 0", ~~ .~ ~.n ~.. ~~.~ ~.. n'" Ol~.!!! .2': lD <II ~.c"C . . 0 '-{ij<= ~~~ noo m '" ~ g~~ ..~ 000 , ,.!!! X , ~ N W ill o ~ ~ N ~ . a ~ . ~ N ~ w ~ 1 , < . ~ , 1 . < i , i < , * , ] ., . ~ ~ . ; , ! . 1 :; , . ! ~ . ! ! ! ,~ ~ ! ,. .. c, o. 1ij~ ~.f; " g.~ g~ '5';: ~~ . . i!O r2 ~i "" n '" ~~ ,. ~~ " i'5 -. ~ ~ ~~ ~ i .gEl ~jf " ., <, ~~ ~ ~ ". '- < , "0 !~ :S-g . " " c. ., " ;, ~'~ " " :e:g ~[ ~ i~ :~ o"'~re<oOO_ '" ~ ~lllg.,.f::[;;~qlZ",[;; 8.0 o::ll:,=~8;!""!;f12"''''''' oS~f(!g"'f:::1Oil;;1il ~ .!! ~g~~~~~~tBZl(!lg 'E1Il . .t!g1O~O>~~<Od}* ~^ - - ~ ~~ Q ... ~."'''' 0>00..- Co; .;"":od ,":O.,,! .C! co.<=! "'! "'. O{\lO <:,0.,.0 0 <'l o iii_ o io "' "'''''''''''.,.0...0..... ,...: 06";"; ~<<i"": "'..,'" .,.",,,, ... ,,;crj05 ..f<ri~..,;oi o ~ ' Cp:: 88!&",,,,5l5l;t;Sl S:8cioiNe>J<'iri":m<>J ">~"'OO{\l<O"''''''O>'''''''' ~~ . ,.., 2l ... "":"'.~~ ~ "lll! ~lil. ~ ~~:g~1Ofer::.:~rJ~ o cD "'!"''''''' "'<0 CO "'<'J ~ .8'","':"':N<O<'i .,.;<<i ~..u ~~~ :~ ~~~~It!~~~~ =p:~::;;:!~~g::::2-_ ,. Cli~ffiftlPJ""S;~.....l!l ~~E~~~~~'~~~ "l"'-'" .."<"l"'.'0;"l 9._0<:,<:,""00<)' = Q Q N . D .c 2 ~G:lO :iti:5 ~E: l~~ ~~E . 0 :€!~o el-~ '" l< . D 2 <3 o ~~ 0;.:."1.,."'."'.....<0"'."'''' tl.8~.,;<\i..,:"'trid." 2"':"'...."'....."'". <0 I o 8: "';;;~:.n~<<i~~::; ~.~...."'.... "'....<0... ""~ "l"'..'<l;'":,"'!C! q . .I:....~<'l'9o"''l'o.... o , "'''l q .0;'1; . .q '"'0"'0"'....0\1<0 o - .. "l<\{o."!"! ."'!"!"l i!! 1;0000...."''''"........ JU ......... ~1f:. '" 0....'" 0"'.... tj"':1:'2~<<i <<ici": , .,..0)"'0""0 ~ ...."'..... ....0"',.. 2irs~g!;t~!:i~l!lgj:li(ii ~&! ?~~~r:.;~Ci~":'" ~ ~gg::'J~r!:f!!ffiS;[;;83 ! i ..0 .s1ii~ -" Ee ;;!:;z..."'g....o"'re o~8~gj<igj83~gg[!ij ;,;..-.....,..,- -.........- . L ~~Sl~8$~?PH! .c(6@:""-t"'8"'''"''''' lil~~!;:~~;::>~~~ "'''''''01'- ......'" "':":"':<?lricJ,,;":"': ~"!"l .'Xl ...."""l o"""',;-O,?,:, "/: " g...'I;"''''''''''''co"",,, 1>.8~.gmct~[jR~m lii~ , 8 ~;;;!CO~O:,,!"l~~ O~"""'''''u')~[z18,...", < ~ g:c~ "'I>. '5&:'" .;0; ~"' ~ 1ii ~ ~ ,... ~Q g>11> "'!II~::> ~~8.ga~~~&:'" 1:;;:;, [llw Z J:I.<I) S <3.~C)~~8)~~ ,:,[0.. o.!:l ~ 'a ~ ~ fii~~ > z rn"1; o . o I I i ~ , i ~ 'I ~ . ;, . li " ~ " " , " ~ , < . ~ , ~ i " . ~ , o ~ t ~ , ! , ~ 1 . . ;; , ~ , 1 ~ ~ > ~ ; , i li , 8 . , . . , .!:l-" ~ ~ i~ [1 'l!.~ ;~ "0 " '8 n i8 !~ I. !~ " " ~~ I~ ," .~ l' ,. ~lll ., h H ," H .. ~~ ~:g !i So H H ~. 8 ~ ~[ ~ ~ ~~ ~o TVCVB Online Booking Report- YTD May 2005 - November 2007 T~m.""bC....klnn November Rooms Booked = 31 "" ." "' 16' .. .. . 94 "" _,WJift,l; 37 " .' 111 ,- , , 124 . 7 ~ 7 8 77 51 . 270 ". 202 3 , 8 78 S'MhC".>lWlnery R"d~.~' Rnm.d.fun P.""..!:" Po].M...Re""rt Pol.C.sino Holid.~lnnExp..... H.mplonllln&Snitos &teodedSlDJAmerica Embo",'Suit.. .Quoli!)''''. CamrortlnnMurrldu Castl.C<eek llestW<>fernF.Ubro<>k 1I.'IW......nT.m.<lI1a 50 100 150 Room NigbtsBooked pel" Hotel 300 wo 2;0 TVCVB Online Booking Revenue May 2005 - November 2007 Revenue By Year/Month: ~ ~ Total Booking R~yenue: $198,678 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 TVCVB Online Booking Report- YTD May 2005 - November 2007 T.nl<<u," C....k lnu November Rooms Booked = 31 16' 94 37 III 124 t ; 8 77 51 210 202 r: 3 78 S.ulhCuu<lWlhay R<>d_ay Ibo""d.ho. P<clI.oup PuluMe<IIRooort rubCasihO Hullduy,,"uExpr'ellll Humpl""lnu&Sull" E>:ttlld<dSlayAmerlco EmbusySul1eS QuaJItyID. ComforllnuMurrieta Ca$l1.C_k BestWooternFollbrook S<<tWest....TeIIIecI>lo 50 100 ISO 200 Room NightsBooked per Hotel '" '" TVCVB Online Booking Revenue May 2005 - November 2007 Revenue By Year/Month: ~ ~ 70000 60000 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 November 2007 Monthly Activity Report for Temecula Valley Visitors Center Day Date Walk-ins Visitinq From Thu 11/1 16 Montana San Diego Temecula Hemet Fri 11/2 17 London Baldwin Park Diamond Bar Ohio Sat 11/3 45 Florida Massachusetts Paso Robles Vancouver Sun 11/4 35 Washington Canada Scotland New York Total 113 Day Date Walk-ins Visitinq From Mon 11/5 14 Areteno Indiana Ohio Alaska Tue 11/6 15 Arizona Minnesota Germany O.C Wed 11/7 14 Maryland Norway Encinitas San Diego Thu 11/8 12 New Mexico Colorado Chicago Las Vegas Fri 11/9 28 Louisiana Temecula Murrieta Boston Sat 11/10 51 New York Long Beach L.A. Rialto Sun 11/11 52 Japan Paris Westlake Lexum berg Total 186 Day Date Walk-ins Visitinq From Mon 11/12 32 Japan Louisiana Temecula Indiana Tue 11/13 19 Canada Virginia Orange County Murrieta Wed 11/14 13 Rhode Island San Diego Las Vegas Oregon Thu 11/15 16 Oklahoma Sweden Paso Robles L.A Fri 11/16 8 San Marcos Palm Beach England Escondido Sat 11/17 11 Washington Milwaukee Ohio Long Island Sun 11/18 9 Total 108 Day Date Walk-ins Visitinq From Mon 11/19 41 Temecula N. California Claremont Thousand Oaks Tue 11/20 18 Indiana Minnesota N CoYina Taiwan Wed 11/21 5 Truckee Kansas Japan England Thu 11/22 o (HOLlDAY- THANKSGIVING) Fri 11/23 42 Corona Murrieta Canada San Clemente Sat 11/24 41 Wisconsin Mission Viejo N Dakota Chicago Sun 11/25 18 San Diego L.A. San Gabriel O.C Total 165 Day Date Walk-ins Visitinq From Mon 11/26 14 Temecula San Diego Texas Fallbrook Tue 11/27 10 Murrieta T.J. Spain Oakland Wed 11/28 17 Chicago Minneapolis Monrovia Chula Vista Thu 11/29 20 Julian Sun City England St Louis Fri 11/30 7 Poway High Desert Escondido Guadalajara Total 68 Grand Total 640 I .. ! :f <~ 1 Sf>l t U.. f>l.. ~; d '" (() a co C'l Ii) ~ a co (() ~ C\J co '" co ,~ ., a co Ii) "- C\J .i!i!!: c ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , " (ij - 3: , (ij _. - " "0 -. , . f- - - ." '" Ii) ~ C'l "'" '" ~ "'" '" ~ "- C\J ~ Ii) ~ (() (() C'l C'l a ~ c "- ~ (ij 3: - . 1ii i75 - '" ~ '" Ii) '" (() a (() '" Ii) "'" a "- "'" "- "'" C\J C\J "'" C\J CD c CIO ~ (ij 3: 0 - E B 'c;; Ql :> " !!2 ~ co C'l ~ "'" "- a ~ co Ii) a "'" a '" Ii) Ii) C\J "- co C'l ~ C'l C\J C'l ~ C\J C\J ~ C\J C'l C'l C\J ~ C'l ~ ~ ~ (ij c U c;; (ij "0 f- a C\J ~ a a a a a ~ ~ ~ a ~ a C'l a a ~ a ~ - !!2 0 (ij U t '" ~ ii Ql Ql :;;; t !!2 "- Ii) C\J "'" ~ "'" "'" co "'" co Ii) ~ "'" a C'l ~ "- C\J (() CD ~ C\J ~ C'l ~ ~ ~ ~ C\J C'l ~ ~ C\J ~ ~ Ol 0 (ij '" C. Ql U - ~ 1ii :;; i75 1:5 "'" ~ a "- C'l C'l (() C'l C'l (() "'" C'l Ii) '" '" "'" Ii) "'" C\J - !!2 ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" (ij - U - 0 c E 0 ~ .9 'c;; :> "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- Q; a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a E fOI fOI ~ fOI fOI ~ ~ fOI ~ fOI ~ ~ ~ fOI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fOI fe 1::: C'l Ii) ~ ~ Ql ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fOI fOI fOI fOI fOI fOI !2 1il ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Cl .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III Cii - 0 - '" ~ '" ~ "tl fi1 ~ c '" "0 '" "0 ~ C '" "0 C '" "0 l: ::J Ql Ql ::J Ql Ql ::J Ql Ql Ql Ql ::J E! .c .;:: 0 ::J 3: .c ;t ::J 3: .c it 0 ::J 3: 0 ::J 3: .c It Cl f- LL :;;; f- f- f- f- :;;; f- :;;; f- f- CI ~ o :;;; al > U > f- - a: a: <C :;:: :;;; "- a a C\J -" z v Soltihw~st Califor11,ia EC011,Olnlc Allill11,Ce Date: October 24,2007 J3oar(fM~~ting Draft . Draft Meeting Facilitator: Stevie Field, Executive Director Directors: Stevie Field, Economic Sherrie Jared, County of Gloria W olnick, City of Temecula Alliance Riverside . Agenda Items I. Call to order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Minutes 4. Financial Report 5. New Business 6. Continuing Business 7. Open Discussion 8. Adjourn Discussion .()fA.g~n(fa.ltel1ts . . ......... ........ ... 1. Meeting called to Order at 3:20 by Stevie Field 2. Agenda approved by Stevie Field, seconded by Gloria Wolnick 3. Minutes approved by Sherrie Jared, seconded by Gloria W olnick 4. Financial Report approved by Sherrie Jared seconded by Gloria Wolnick 5. New Business - a. Business Expansion Magazine, California Focus Issue $1600.00 Y, page island 4 color editorial with Dan and Nad Commercial. b. Economic Development Institute/IEDC Learning Cources - Motion was made by Gloria Wolnick and seconded by Sherrie Jared to send April to the Basic Economic Development Course not to exceed $1600.00 c. BIG 2008 Exhibit on own or with Team Riverside. Get distribution rights to do a wine tasting in San Diego, possible food and wine pairing, wine makers. Work with Tomi Arbogast. d. CoreNet 2008 - Partner with Team California for CoreNet 2008 San Diego. e. Site Selectors Tour - Get IAMC list for tour 6. Continuing Business - a. Job Fair Update - Total resumes filled out to date is 572. Booth page viewed 1689 times. February Job Fair will run for entire month. b. Broker Breakfast Update - We had a total of 40 brokers in attendance. c. Broker Breakfast February 2008 - Possible wine and cheese, breakfast, Bear Creek possible venue in Murrieta. A afemoon Baseball game and meeting in May. See if we can get Bob Baddy to come and speak. d. MOU - Completed and signed for all Cities and County e. Planning Session - Get partners together and find out if we are still focusing on industries that they want us to focus on. f. GIS Virtual Meeting - Set up a meeting with Mario to go over GIS. 7. Open Discussion - a. Alliance Monthly update - no updates b. City County Update - no updates i. Lake Elsinore - no updates ii. Murrieta - no updates iii. Temecula - no updates iv. Couuty of Riverside - no updates 8. Adjourn - Motion was made by Gloria Wolnick and seconded by Sherrie Jared to Adjourn meeting at 4:55pm 9. 10. 0. I Action Items Set up meeting with Mario. Follow up by: I Stevie Venue choices for Broker Breakfast April SOUlf1WEST J~iflz'QY:hUt Lake Elain0l'8 Murrieta Temecula ,~ County of Riverside TO: Sarah Mundy Deputy Director Riverside County EDA Aaron Adams Assistant City Manager City of Temecula Ron Bradley City Manager City of Murrieta Cathy Barrozo Analyst City of Lake Elsinore FROM: Stevie Field Executive Director DATE: November 16, 2007 SUBJECT: SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA MONTHLY MARKETING UPDATE - - Dear Partners: Please consider this an update on the marketing activities for the Alliance as required in the Southwest California Marketing for Business Attraction Agreement. Leads During October, we had 15 leads. Of these, we are working on two custom packages to companies looking to expand to Southern California. I am also working with a broker who wants to do a 50 acre project in the French Valley area. I will provide more information as these projects/leads develop. Web-site/GIS During October, we had 6,736 visitors to our website. I continue to work with Cutting Edge Marketing to update the website. I will be purchasing the most current demographic information to be included on the site from Claritas and Dataquick. We are also adding a new projects page which will feature information and links to some of the new and exciting projects in our region. We will also be updating our GIS application. Mario Ubalde of GIS Planning will be attending our November Alliance meeting. I will send out an email to your GIS representatives so that they can be included in this meeting. We will discuss the latest GIS technology, available updates and cost associated with this update. MOU I am pleased to announce that the MOU between the City of Lake Elsinore and the Alliance was unanimously approved in October. All MOU's have been approved with the Partners for the '07- 08 fiscal year. Broker Breakfast Wednesday, October 17'" we hosted our first Broker Breakfast of 2007 at the Pinnacle Restaurant located at Falkner Winery. We had 42 guests and 13 Alliance representatives. We have received several comments back which were all positive. Based on this feedback, many are looking forward to our next breakfast in February. April is gathering venue quotes which wiil be presented at our next Alliance meeting on November 28th Virtual Job Fair/Job Database Our first Virtual Job Fair, located at www.stopyourcommutinq.com was held on Oct. 21 - November 3,2007. Exhibitors included the Partners, as well as KFRG, The Scotts Company and Entech Engineering. While we did not have a large number of exhibitors, we had an overwhelming response from job seekers. Our goal which was stated in our '07-'08 Alliance Work Plan was to have 500 registered job seekers. I am pleased to report that we had 798 job seekers register and upload their resumes. As discussed in our October Alliance meeting, we wili host the next Alliance job fair in February, and rather than hold the fair for one week, we wiil host it for the entire month of February. April and I will be contacting employers this week with hopes that we will have more success with the exhibitor component of the fair in February. I wiil provide a complete report at the November Alliance meeting. This will include website visitor totals, exhibitor booth visitor totals etc. Trade shows/conferences On behalf of the Alliance, I havelwiil be attending the following trade shows/conferences: Industrial Asset Management Council (IAMC) Corporate Office & Real Estate Network (CoreNet) Consultants Forum (Site Selectors Conference) St. Louis, MO Atlanta, GA Savannah, GA Oct. 7-10 Oct. 27 - 31 Dec. 2-5 If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact me at 952.696.1578. Sincerely, Stevie Field Executive Director Copy: Gloria Wolnick Verne Lauritzen SOUTHVVES I (J~l~t~oPhta@ :',j',-",:;,, Lake Elsinore .U~;'ili~:~~~~f Rivereide Southwest California Virtual Job Fair October 22 - November 3, 2007 Total Registered Job Seekers: 842 Total resumes submitted for available positions: 23 Total Unique Visitors: August - 175 September - 675 October - 1,775 November - 876 Grand Total: 3,501 Total Number of Visits: August-175 September-l,03l October - 3,498 November- 1,098 Grand Total: 5,802 Facts: Total Jobs Posted: Total Premier Exhibitors Total Elite Exhibitors Total Basic Exhibitors 22 1 1 5 Total Job Views: Busiest Days of the week: Busiest Times of day: 1,883 Monday and Tuesday 7-8 p.m. (however, most traffic was from 4 p.m. - 4 a.m.) SOUTHWEST CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC ALLIANCE. 37552 Winchester Road, Suite A, Murrieta, CA 92563 Ph: (951) 696-1578. Fax: (951) 698-7920. Web: www.sourhwestcalifornia.com. E-mail: info@southwestcalifornia.com ITEM NO. 20 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Mark Harold, Director of Building and Safety DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Departmental Report - November and December 2007 The month of November 2007 showed a gain of construction activity as compared to previous months. The following is an overview of permit and inspection activity for November. SinQle Familv Development - Tracts In November, the City issued 20 new single family tract home permits. The homes are primarily in Wolf Creek which has134 homes under construction. Harveston also has 46 homes under construction at this time. There are a total of 266 single family homes under construction throughout the City at the current time. Custom SinQle Familv Homes As of November, we have a total of 14 custom homes under construction. Multi-Familv Development In November there were 62 condominiums permits issued for Temecula Lane, and 13 condominiums under construction in the Harveston Savannah Development. Commercial Development There was 4 new commercial permit issued in November. The Plan check activity submittal is 27307 Nicolas Road, 27423 Ynez Road, and 40820 Winchester Road. Total Permit and Inspection Activitv During the month of November inspection staff performed 3,933 inspections and 155 permits were issued representing a construction valuation of $38,658,784.63. The total building permit and plan check fees collected in the month of November were $171,798.52. The month of December 2007 showed a gain of construction activity as compared to previous months. The following is an overview of permit and inspection activity for December. SinQle Familv Development - Tracts In December, the City issued 16 new single family tract home permits. The homes are primarily in Wolf Creek which has134 homes under construction. Harveston also has 46 homes under construction at this time. There are a total of 266 single family homes under construction throughout the City at the current time. Custom SinQle Familv Homes As of December, we have a total of 14 custom homes under construction which include 6 homes by Habitat for Humanity. Multi-Familv Development In December there were 62 condominiums permits issued for Temecula Lane, and 13 condominiums under construction in the Harveston Savannah Development. Commercial Development There was 1 new commercial permit issued in Decemberforthe Plaza Rio Vista at 43015 Blackdeer Loop Road. The Plan check activity submittal is 27307 Nicolas Road, 27423 Ynez Road, and 40820 Winchester Road. Total Permit and Inspection Activitv During the month of December inspection staff performed 2,858 inspections and 207 permits were issued representing a construction valuation of $14,451,430.32. The total building permit and plan check fees collected in the month of December were $72,634.38. ITEM NO. 21 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jerry Williams, Chief of Police DATE: January 22, 2008 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of December 2007. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service .................................................................................................7,495 "Priority One" calls for service....................................................................................................... 54 Average response time for "Priority One" calls............................................................. 5.20 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours................................................................................................... 492 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours....................................................................................... 163 Reserve officer hours (patrol) ....................................................................................................... 12 Total Volunteer hours.................................................................................................................. 869 CRIME PREVENTION/GRAFFITI Crime prevention workshops conducted........................................................................................ 1 Residential/business security surveys conducted .......................................................................... 0 Businesses visited....................................................................................................................... ... 2 Businesses visited for past crime follow-up.................................................................................... 5 Crime prevention articles................................................................................................................ 1 Total square footage of graffiti removed.................................................................................. 6,198 Number of Graffiti Locations........................................................................................ 71 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served............................................................................................................... 218 Sets of fingerprints taken.............................................................................................................. 44 Police reports filed........................................................................................................................ 33 Citations signed off ....................................................................................................................... 18 Total receipts..................................................................................................................... $3,223.50 SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM (SET TEAM) On sight felony arrests .................................................................................................................... 2 On sight misdemeanor arrests...................................................................................................... 12 Felony arrest warrants served ........................................................................................................6 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served .............................................................................................8 Follow-up investigations............................................................................................................... 21 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations ................................................................................... 600 D.U.I. checkpoints conducted......................................................................................................... 2 Non-hazardous citations............................................................................................................. 159 Stop Light Abuse Program (SLAP.) citations........................................................................... 110 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations ................................................................... 69 Parking citations.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... 368 Injury collisions.............................................................................................................................. 18 Presentations............................................................................................................ .0 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Case load .................................................................................................................... 206 Total Cases Assigned .................................................................................................................. 46 Total Cases Closed .............................................................................. .34 Number of community seminars conducted ................................................................................... 0 Presentations............................................................................................................ .0 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service........................................................................................................................... 379 Felony arrest/filings....................................................................................................................... 33 Misdemeanor arrest/filings............................................................................................................ 62 Vehicle burglaries........................................................................................................................... 1 Vehicle thefts. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... ... ... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ..... ... ..... 3 Total receipts..................................................................................................................... $5,055.00 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests................................................................................................................................. 4 Misdemeanor arrests ...................................................................................................................... 0 Citations..................................................................................................................... ................... 23 Youth counseled....................................................................................................................... 197 Presentations........................................................................................................... .5 Drug Alcohol Awareness Grades 11-12 Anti-Bulling Gangs Juvenile Law Career Day YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY TEAM Orientations delivered to new program members .......................................................................... 0 School visits.................................................................................................................................. 39 Home visits........................................................................................................................ ............ 26 Presentations............................................................................................................ .4 Truancy Sweep............................................................................................................O ITEM NO. 22 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager ~ ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works DATE: January 14, 2008 SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the attached Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Reports for the months of November and December, 2007. ',. ; CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report December 2007 / January 2008 Prepared By: Amer Attar Submitted by: William G. Hughes Date: January 22, 2008 PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION 1. Fire Station - Northeast Site (Roripaugh Ranch) This project will construct a new fire station in the north part of the City. The majority of work was completed by April of 2006. Roripaugh Developer (Ashby) schedule shows access and utilities to the site in August 2007. Because of this there was cost to re-mobilize and complete the project when the aforementioned items are complete, these costs are reflected in an approved change order total, which is the responsibility of the developer. In addition, a fire engineltruck venting system (requested/added on 2/06) will be installed when the Contractor is re-mobilized; this cost is also included in the approved change order total. 2. Temecula Education Center- Rough Grading This project will provide for the grading of the proposed Temecula Education Center. Project was awarded on 4/11/06. Construction started on 5/1106. CCO#1 to relocate/modify all impacted utilities along Diaz Road adjacent to the project was approved by the RDA Board on 10/10/06 and Diaz Road was brought up to grade. All work was completed on March 28,2007. Other ongoing work under this contract involves EMWD work outside of the project limit which was completed in late July. The property was prepared for the rainy season and we are in the process of resolving all issues with EMWD. 3. City Field Operations Center (Maintenance Facility and Corporate Yard) - Phase 2 This project will construct the second phase of the City's Field Operation Center, which includes the building and the corporate yard. The project was awarded on July 25, 2006, a preconstruction meeting was held on 8-10-06 and the Notice to Proceed was issued effective 8-11-06 The final punch list work is being performed, we expect completion of all punch list items by mid January. During the recent rains we experienced a few leaks at the stem wall to curtain wall connection. Brady and Assoc. have offered a solution and Tovey Shultz is reviewing its constructability. 4. Fire Station - Wolf Creek Site A new 3-bay, 9,062 SF, heavy urban fire station will be built at the SE corner of Wolf Valley Rd & Wolf Creek Dr South. A $3,591,000 construction contract was awarded to RC Construction on 7/25/06. Fire moved into Station in 7/30/7. The Grand Opening took place on 9/15/7. There's a potential claim that may surface (U/G electrical conduits vs. overhead placement). We are expecting Contractor's Affidavit & Final Release, pending release of retention. A few warranty issues have come up and the Contractor is working on them. 5. Diaz Road Realignment to Vincent Moraga Under this project, Diaz Road will be realigned starting just south of Rancho Way to Vincent Moraga Road at Rancho California Road. Business Park Drive will be a T-intersection at Diaz. The traffic signal at existing Diaz Road and Rancho California Road will be removed. Project is complete, with the exception of a few remaining punch list items. Landscape maintenance period will terminate on February 9, 2008. Notice of Completion is to be filed in February. 6. Rancho California Road Widening, Old Town Front Street to 1-15 (Southside) This project will construct an additional eastbound lane to provide for a right turn lane to southbound 1-15, as well as modify the existing median to accommodate dual left turn lanes from westbound Rancho California Road to southbound Old Town Front Street. The additional east bound lane (to 1- 15 southbound on-ramp) is now open to traffic. The median landscaping is now complete and the additional westbound left turn pocket was opened to traffic during the last period. A storm drain line crossing Old Town Front Street will still need to be constructed once an AT&T conflicting conduit is relocated. Work is scheduled to be completed by the end of January (pending AT&T conduit relocation). 7. Bridge Fencing Enhancement This portion of the project will provide Architectural Enhancements to the recently constructed fencing at the Overland Drive and Rancho California Road bridges over Interstate 15. Work was completed on 11/19/07. Council Acceptance is expected on 01/08/08. 8. 1-15 and 79 South Sign Replacement - Temecula Parkway Name Addition and Replacem!lnt of 79South Signs Within City Limits This project will add the newly adopted name of "Temecula Parkway" to the appropriate freeway signs and change all "79 South" signs within City Limits. Ail installations have been completed. Project closure is forthcoming. 9. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Emergency Channel Grading Rainfall on 12/01/07 prompted the City Council to declare a Local Emergency on 12/11/07 due to an unforeseen flood condition at the CRC. P/W Staff negotiated with TCSD's Annual Agreement Contractor to complete the grading work; construction was completed on 12/13/07. Staff received advanced authorizati.on from USACE and is currently seeking after-the fact authorization from CDFG. Mitigation may be required for the impacts to the channel; discussions with regulatory agencies on this matter continue. 10. Murrieta Creek Multi Purpose Trail This project will build equestrian and bike trails along Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Diaz Road. The project is funded in part by a $1 ,214,000 federal grant. Riverside County Flood Control has issued the Encroachment Permit. The City is working with the consultant to revise the irrigation plans and process them through RCWD. Eastern Municipal Water District's Force Main project has just been completed. Once the irrigation plans are approved by RCWD construction can commence. 2 11. Traffic Signal Installation - Rancho California Road at Business Park West Under this project, a traffic signal will be installed on Rancho California Road at Business Park West. A pre-construction meeting was held on 11/15/07. The City received delivery of the poles and the controller. Most of the conduits were bored. Also, all signal pole foundations have been placed with the exception of one. The contractor is working on the removal of the old curbs at the corners to install the handicap ramps. PROJECTS BEING ADVERTISED FOR BIDS None PROJECTS IN DESIGN 1. Pechanga Parkway Improvements - Phase II (SR 79 South to Pechanga Road) This project will widen Pechanga Parkway (formerly Pal a Road) to its ultimate width from the Pechanga Parkway Bridge to Pechanga road. The Environmental Document (Categorical Exclusion) was approved by FHWA on April 19, 2007. The PS&E package & request for authorization (RFA) was re-submitted to Caltrans on 11/1/07. Caltrans provided comments to the City and the City responded to these comments and resubmitted the package. Caltrans has reviewed and approved the RFA package. It has been forwarded to Caltrans HQ for issuance of the construction authorization. Also, we are working with our landscape consultant to modify the irrigation plans to accommodate recycled water due to newly, adopted State laws and RCWD regulations. Once the City receives a letter of authorization for construction (E-76) from Caltrans, the public bidding process can be initiated for construction. 2. Pechanga Parkway Storm Drain Improvements - Environmental Mitigation The project includes the construction of new wetlands as part of the Wolf Valley Creek Channel - Stage I Project. The mitigation site is located along the north bank of Temecula Creek (within the floodplain and floodway area). The environmental regulatory agencies have approved this new mitigation area and would not have accepted the 5-year maintenance on the Pal a Road Bridge mitigation site unless this new mitigation project was provided by the City. New landscaping and an irrigation system will be installed. Once the mitigation area is constructed, the City will perform a 5- year maintenance and monitoring plan. RCFC & WCD stated thatthe proposed mitigation site is not within their maintenance area and they have no significant comments regarding the installation. Final plan check comments were provided to the consultant during the week of 1/7/08. The City has requested the consultant to provide signed mylars. The appraisal for three easements is now complete and offers for purchase of the property will be made to owners during the month of January. 3. Murrieta Creek Bridge - Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road This project includes studying alignments, design and construction of an extension of Overland Drive, westerly to Diaz Road, including a new bridge over Murrieta Creek. Coordination with RCFC & WCD and the U. S. Army Corp of Engineers is required. Plan check comments were sent to the consultant during the month of January; however, the design is currently on hold until the Corps finalizes the HEC-RAS Study for Murrieta Creek. The access ramps to the creek and under crossings at bridges have not yet been included in the HEC-RAS cross-sectional data. Until this 3 work is accomplished by the Corps, an accurate hydraulic run for Murrieta Creek cannot be evaluated. The Consultant for the Corps will be performing the final hydraulic run for Murrieta Creek to verify that a 3' freeboard under the Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive (Avenida Alvarado) is provided. 4. Main Street Bridge Over Murrieta Creek (Replacement) This project will replace the existing Main Street Bridge over Murrieta Creek. Design consultant Simon Wong Engineering (SWE) and the City are continuing to pursue environmental permitting and coordination issues associated with pursuing the bridge replacement as a project separate from the Corps of Engineer's Murrieta Creek improvement project. Riverside County Flood Control has provided data .from the Corps regarding creek delineation, from which EDAW (environmental subconsultant) is determining their scope of work. EDAW's field work is to begin in January '08. EDA W has also determined that this project may qualify for a 404(r) exemption, which would shorten the environmental process somewhat. Further information on this development is forthcoming. 5. Diaz Road Extension to Cherry Street This project is "On-hold'" as it is some what dependent on the final state of the Education Center property. 6. Santa Gertrudis Bicyclel Trail Undercrossing at Margarita Road This project will construct a trail for bicycles and pedestrians along Santa Gertrudis Creek under Margarita Road. Data regarding existing utilities are being incorporated into the design. RCFC has provided an Encroachment Permit. This project cannot be constructed until adequate funds are identified. An application was submitted for State Bicycle Transportation Account (BT A) funds on 12/1/06. Plans & Specs will be soon and the project will be shelved until funding is identified and appropriated. 7. Western Bypass Corridor - Alignment Study This project will complete an alignment study for the northern portion of the Western Bypass Corridor (from Cherry Street to just south of Rancho California Road The City has provided comments to the Consultant, URS, on the final plans. URS has submitted their Draft Final Report. This report is currently being reviewed by the City. 8. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal & Desiltation Pond This project includes restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and the requirement of RWQCB by desilting the channel & pond located near the Sports Park. City's environmental consultant, BonTerra, continues to work on the environmental clearance process. Civil design was initiated utilizing the Annual Agreement consultant. Staff is reviewing 70% submittal. Possible mitigation requirements by regulatory agencies have prompted a down-sized construction scope of work. Exact impacts on the environmental and design processes have yet to be determined. 9. Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek This project involves the design and construction of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the westerly terminus of SR-79S and an extension of Pujol Street to the new structure. Once constructed, this will serve as the southerly connection of the Western Bypass Corridor. This project has been on hold pending negotiations for possible takeover by a private developer. An agreement 4 was not reached, therefore it is anticipated that the City will restart design and environmental studies in January 2008. 10. Temecula Community Center Expansion This project will add approximately 4000 square feet of space to the existing Temecula Community Center to accommodate more human services programs. The Escallier House and Barn will be moved onto the Community Center site. The Project plans were submitted to Building and Safety and Fire on 12/10/07. TCSD is also currently reviewing the drawings. The architect is working on specifications. The grading plan is to be submitted on 1/11/08. There have been 2 plan checks and this submittal should be the last. The WQMP for this project has been reviewed and a meeting was held with the design consultant and City staff. The revised plan will be complete in January 2008. The design contract for the Escallier House and Barn is being negotiated with Meyer and Associates. 11. Redhawk Park Improvements, Four Sites This project will add amenities to four park sites in the recently annexed Redhawk area. Due to budgetary restraints, the construction was divided into phases over a number of years. At the December 11,2007 meeting, the City Council approved an agreement with RJM for the construction drawings of the chosen amenities, which include a half court basketball court, ADA accessible parking, and dog park at Redhawk Community Park; a seatwall and shade structure at Sunset Park. The preparation of the construction drawings is underway. 12. Old Town Infrastructure Projects - Site Demolition and Site Preparation This project involves demolishing the existing non-historic structures on the City owned parcels at the intersection Main and Mercedes to make way for the Main Street Realignment and the Old Town Parking Structure. The remaining relocations to occur under this contract are the Escallier House and Barn, which are scheduled to be relocated Feb/March 2008. 13. Old Town Infrastructure Projects - Underground Utility District This project will effectively underground all overhead utility lines along Old Town Front Street, between 2nd and 6th streets, all of Main Street east of Murrieta Creek and Mercedes Street between 2nd and 6th streets. SCE along with Verizon and Time Warner are finalizing their designl participation of the U/G Utility District. Street improvement plans have been forwarded to the utilities. The project will be bid out in 2 parts - Rule 20A (Edison's portion) and 20B (City's portion). U/G utility construction is being closely coordinated with the street improvement project and is anticipated in April 2008. 14. Old Town Infrastructure Projects - Street Improvements, Mercedes St (2nd - 6th) & the Realignment of Main St. and Construction of the Town Square This project includes street improvements on Mercedes & Main Streets. For bidding purposes, this work and the Town Square improvements were merged. The Town Square construction include the plaza area for Phase 1 of the Civic Center. One contractor will be responsible for the entire project. Street plans are 99% complete. RBF will submit final submittal the week of 01/14/08. City will review and ensure its completeness within 2 weeks. Request for authorization to solicit bids from the City Council took place on 11/27/07. The project is scheduled to bid by Feb 2008. Construction is anticipated to start in Mar 2008. 5 15. Old Town Infrastructure Projects - Parking Structure & Office/Retail frontage This project will construct a parking structure, including office and retail frontage as part of phase 1 of Old Town Civic Center project. NMR will submit construction documents in January 2008 along with Caltrans requirements for encroachment permit applications for the retaining wall and the storm drain system. 16. Old Town Civic Center Phase 2 Under this project the design and construction documents for phase two of the Civic Center Project will be developed. Design consultant NMR continues the schematic design process. NMR is finalizing the departmental floor plans and exterior elevations. 17. Temecula Parkway (formerly 79 South) Park & Ride This project will design and construct a park and ride facility on Temecula Parkway (formerly 79 South) at La Paz. AAE, Inc. has submitted a revised site plan that reflects changes required by City staff. This plan is under review. The WQMP for this project will require the loss of approximateiy 30 parking spaces. 18. De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project (from Jedediah Smith to Margarita) This project includes rehabilitating De Portola Road from Jedediah Smith Road to Margarita Road. This is a federally funded project. The Environmental Document (Categorical Exclusion) was approved by Caltrans on August 8,2007. The Consultant will be submitting 70% plans for review in January 2008. 19.79 South to Pechanga Parkway - Dual Right Turn Lanes This project includes the design and construction of two right turn ianes on eastbound Temecula Parkway (formerly State Route 79 South) to southbound Pechanga Parkway. The design includes the widening of Temecula Parkway and relocation of traffic signal poles. 100% design plans are complete and signed mylars will be submitted to the City during the week of 1/14/08. 20~ Santiago Detention Basin This project includes the design of a 1 acre desilting basin. The proposed basin is located on the south side of Santiago Road between Vallejo Avenue and Orsmby Road. The consultant has begun work on the design; however, the first submittal will be delayed until the geotechnical work is complete. Petra has performed the geotechnical work and the report will be submitted to the City during the week of 1/14/08. Submittal of the 50% design plans is expected by 1/25/2008. 21. Pavement Rehabilitation - STPL Project This project will rehab Rancho California Road from Ynez Rd. to the City limits on the east. Geotechnical and survey work have been completed. Consultant has submitted the 30% design package to the City for review. Comments were forwarded back to them. Consultant will submit the 70% design to the City in early December City has submitted the PES, NES (MI) and ISA package to Caltrans for review and just received the signed PES form. Comments for NES (MI) and ISA have been received from Caltrans. The comments were addressed and returned to Caltrans. 6 22. Winchester Road/79-North Corridor Beautification This federally funded project will design and construct landscaping and irrigation enhancements to the existing raised medians along Winchester Road between Ynez Road and the easterly City limit. The consultant submitted the 60% design package to the City for review. City forwarded the comments back to the consultant. The City received the signed PES package from Caltrans. The City has received comments forthe NES (MI) & ISA from Caltrans. The comments were addressed and returned to Caitrans. 23. French Valley Parkway Phase 1 - Southbound Off-Ramp to Jefferson, Auxiliary Lane, and Widening the Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester Southbound Off-ramp A southbound of-Ramp to Jefferson, an auxiliary lane, and widening the bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek at the Winchester southbound off-ramp are the components of Phase 1. The City and Caltrans have agreed that immediate action is required to relieve congestion at the Winchester Road southbound off-ramp. Status is as follows: )> PS&E - Consultant is preparing 95% plans (retaining walls and landscape/irrigation). )> Type Selection for Retaining Walls - Approved November 2007. )> Right of Way - Establishing limits of dedication. Discussions are continuing with owners of affected parcels within Phase 1 work. )> Construction Cooperative Agreement - Caltrans comments received on 2nd fact sheet submittal; City is preparing additional information requested. )> Maintenance Agreement - City preparing exhibit for the first draft. )> Declaration of Units - Caltrans Approved Metric Exception for this phase. )> Utilities - Amendment #8, for utility support, approved by City Council on 12/11/07. Staff will be meeting with the consultant on 01/10/08 to initiate work as specified in the Amendment. )> Conceptual Landscape/Aesthetics - 1 st submittal to Caltrans returned with comments; City is expecting 3 conceptual options for Phase 1 on 01/14/08. These options will be presented to IBC for review; Caltrans will be invited to this publicly noticed meeting. 24. Old Town Gymnasium This project will construct a gymnasium in old town, adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club. The Boys and Girls Club site is too small for the proposed Gymnasium. We are currently working with Riverside County Flood Control (RCFC) to acquire a property adjacent the Boy's and Girl's Club for the new gymnasium. The City's architect, WLC, is working on several design options that we can present to RCFC. 25. Re-Stripe Route 79 South to 8 lanes from 1-15 to Pechanga Parkway This project will provide four lanes in each direction on T emecula Parkway (formerly State Route 79 South) from 1-15 to Pechanga Parkway. Submittal of 90% design plans is expected during the month of January 2008. Construction will be coordinated with the following project: Pechanga Parkway Dual Right Turn Lanes from Temecula Parkway, Project No. PW06-11. 26. Pavement Management System Update 2008-2013 This project will update the City's Pavement Management System for the years 2008-2013. An RFP was forwarded to six consultants for review. City has received 3 proposals from consulting firms. 7 Staff is in the process of reviewing the proposals. The most qualified consultant will be selected towards the end of January 2008. 27. Localized Storm Drain Improvements This project will fix the drainage problem at the south end of Front Street (at the MWD easement). Baseline right of way, utilities, and mapping are established. This project is currently on hold. 28. Long Canyon Detention Basin - Access Road This project wili construct an access road to the Long Canyon Detention Basin. Plans and specifications are 90% complete. City is seeking FEMA funds to remove excess silt deposited within the basin before constructing the access road. Project is on hold until FEMAdetermination is finalized. 29. Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge Over Santa Gertrudis Creek This project includes the construction of an approx. 200' ped/bike bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek near Chaparral H.S. This is a federally funded project, which will involve a NEPA document. Coordination between the City and Rancho California Water District to acquire a portion of an RCWD-owned parcel needed to construct the bridge continues. Design consultant, Nolte Associates, is to begin preliminary surveying and foundation investigation as it relates to bridge design within the next month. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) form is to be submitted to Caltrans within the next month. Coordination with RCWD to obtain a Right-of-Entry permitto perform surveying and foundation investigation work has hit a snag: meeting to work this out scheduled for the week of 1/7/08. PROJECTS IN THE PLANNING STAGE 12.1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange - Project Report (PR) This project will modify the 1-15/ SR 79 South Interchange to accommodate projected future traffic. This is the next step of project development after the completion of the Project Study Report. City continued development of design geometrics and environmental technical studies. Status is as follows: )> Draft Project Report - In circulation for signatures. )> Advisory Design Exceptions - Approved 10/18/06. )> Mandatory Design Exceptions - Approved 10/20/06. )> Stormwater Data Report - 4th submittal is to coincide with final PR Submittal. )> Traffic Study - Approved 09/11/06. )> Modified Access Report - FHW A Determination of Acceptability was approved in July 2007. )> Geometric Approval Drawings - Under development. )> Initial Study Assessment - Approved September 2005. )> Acoustic Evaluation - Approved December 2005. 8 )- Air Quality Assessment - Approved PM10 Nov 2005 and PM2.5 Jul 2006. )- Nat Environmental Study - Approved May 2006. )- Cultural Studies - Approved November 2006. )- Draft Environmental Document - Approved Dec 2007. )- FHW A Air Conformity - 1 st submittal is under Caltrans review. 13. French Valley Parkway Overcrossing and Interchange, Project Report (PR), Plans Specifications, and Estimate (PS&E) Preparation This project will construct an interchange between Winchester Road Interchange and the 1-15/1-215 split. The project is moving through the Caltrans process. Current status is as follows: )- Draft Project Report - Approved June 2006. )- Project Report - Final preparation pending approval of Environmental Document. )- Draft Environmental Document - Under Caltrans cursory review. )- New Connection Report - Final submittal pending Caltrans approval of Traffic Ops Analysis. )- Traffic Operations Analysis - Revising per Caltrans comments. )- Exception to 20-yrTraffic Design - Approved 12/17/07. )- Stormwater Data Report - Preparing final report. )- Mandatory Design Exceptions - Approved 07/18/06. )- Advisory Design Exceptions - Approved 07/18/06. )- Exception to Ramp Metering Policy - Approved 07/05/06. )- Geometric Approval Drawings - Approved 07/18/06. )- Revised Geometric Approval Drawings - Under Caltrans review. )- Storm Drain Study - Revising per Caltrans comments. )- Freeway Agreements - Under Caltrans-HQ review. )- Risk Management Plan - Updating as necessary. )- Project Charter - 1 st draft is under Caltrans review. )- Declaration of Units - Request for Metric Exception denied by Caltrans. )- Maintenance Agmt - Preparing 1 st submittal for Caltrans review. )- Financial Plan - Preparing 2nd submittal for Caltrans review. 9 Q co ~ Q Q u.. ~ 0 Q :::' ~ ~ - ~ W Q Cl <C c.. I- W W :I: en en en w 0: G o 0: D. ~ 0: o 3: > <(..J ..J:I: ::ll- OZ wO ==== W, I-en u..1- 00 >W t::3 00: D. en I- Z W == W > o 0: D. == ..J <( l- e: <( o :::::::::::::: :::<<::::::::::::::::: :u:g::::: .~.~.. ~l~<> ':>:'>:'l:I;l<.. ::::~::t:i 'j!i",l ~lr E{~ o-I~>z. ~i ... :::*::~: ::g:": <i~< ".<fl"Z" J:iS Ii .....~.. .../~< :-::-:-:-1:1;\-:< -:.:-:1;.(.:." lc$" :::ii!Z :-:~-:.. -~ Q) Cl)Q)-..c ~~o~ a. >. >"'C _(I) E'~-~ ~~8~~E ~ -;; Q) ~ C\i a. <r::.- (ij 0 c fa- -::-:5 tI) g. 0 Q) ~15E~~= ..e m$ m::g.!: ~~:g.s~as t3 g c'~ as"C .t::ccg"fioo-B 0) C -- Q) C ::l r-..: a>.c. ::::l__ ~oE==~g ";:: ~ ~"'ffi--ca ~ U;~ B ~.!!2 ::I ....__ cD Cl~ Q) ~13 o~......'E(fj(,,) ~.!: ffi ~ g'.!!2 '02 j ~E .s~ ';::'(jjts~ !f-g ~~'~.6-B~ ~:5! a. g: E.g -gCll~e<Bf.= Q5 ~; 8:.~ ~ a.~ Q5 {tl C.!?! ~~o.lij~o u~~.!:;~ [j(/)u-oro.:= ~ 13 -g ~ c" 6 -tgm_go ororeQ5ijQl(6 ::;: (1)'- .... "O.t:: (5 o~:g~~~:: .2;o..l:: - III Ql "C (I) li= ti ..:j-e .~.$ ~ 0 1Il "'C 0 E.g.g~.2 ~ ~ m1?t5I1J!f.!!!ffi .t::ooIDQ)(/J.c;:; I- (/J ().s"O.s C,) '" . '" '" "'.... Ile "'~ m ...... 'S: ";: = III C Q ::; <: ~ ~ g !:x:: ~ ~ 8 ffi ..'~ ::i lQ @ ~ o o o 00..,. """ N_a:l "'''' "'.... uN c c- Q_N :;:: .0'7 .s6~ Cf.l:;::Q) mQ... ~ ~ ~ iLi;iO ~Cm 000> CO C (t\N~ ~SO O>~... ffi~~ .Q.Q) a. 06a. a:f-<t c; '" o ~ ~C .f!! -g ~ as ~~ cn~ '0 2~m.g~~ 55 co.o g> 8 ~ () (I)"C 0 (/) e c~ffi~~~ ~'5~5.g= gas C3 .:2.f: "U......:!:::r--.:!:~ w~og:t::{tl <<l a...... N E Q) ~.S6tO:::: m="N21? E ro: (ij..l:: '~ro: Q)~oee I- .- III ro: a. a -g1S<(:2~gj [I).,EDt:......Q) o (I) oc 0'0 [I) g-ca (1)-0 Q) >- 0. g; ~:2'~ (l)Q) >-0..11 "- ..I:: ,,-..c E :) Q) .::s-go~; 0..... > u ... 5 Ol:tt: e (I) ~_ :88 2: ~ -g ro:o Cll.:..::D... 0> (I) is 3: ~ . ~ g ~ ~ a1 ~~ :::2g<:mm:2: .ElO"Oa)~S:LU Q) t: ... "0 0 >,...1:: :2oa.~E:'tf ~ -g~ 0)::; 8- ...t:'.....ooom ~.!Yso.~O'ii'l ';;:~c~a~.~ tiO~..I::OI-= .~u"~~,~ . ~ 0:) -00..1:: >- t: o..;;~.B~~2: :E6~gj1?2~ I-OOCs::)Cll;t: ;;- .S 13 ,~u 50 <f..~ 8l", ~~ 513 <f..1i:'u.:..:: g1iU5 .... ,= <f.. == 0>0 .;: 0 0- m ...... 'S: ';: = III C Q ::; o ~a;~_ :g~~ &~ffi ..I::$"E OlLiO ~E ~ a: . C ...~ Cll $(1)..1:: ccO m rn '" oii5,!: c~... ,2 Q) ffi ca !ifa. ~~~g L1J .. > cJ ..!!:!.ge~ 13 al 2:6 Q)"'<(O) E "E -0 lO. (I) 0 t: C\l I-OCllY.l- '" o .b o ~ >-c_ ..c'ca'-=- (I)'t Ol E ~.!: 2......3: ,- 0 (I) ~ =i'~ 13 s: "~ C E N ~m- ~ijj~ rnmU) '0;>- t:1a~ ,2 (I) I- <;;-B 0..Q)-g' E - = o ~ t: 0_0 tiCll:g IlT~ m c rn m",... ~ ~ '" '" ~ -0 ~2 Q)(I)'O E m m 5 s: ~ t _ ~ 2i.~ Li O>~o c__ ,- t: <Il ~8<( ,~ ~-g ~~ ~ ,-... , 0> = - C ~ ,g'5 ~ {306~ 5 >'U:B a.(ij(l)Cll (ijE2g .2~8.;; Jl:g1ij6 I-E3:o '" . - '" <f..~ "'- "'~ '" ...... 'S: ~ = III C Q ::; >->- :!:: Q) ~~ u.'-t:~ ~.9 ~ ~ t: U E..I:: ~~<(O 2t:t)-g .!: 8 ~ 6 ~ ."E 0- ,:,~8~ ."!i(l c~ c":a. ~-c ~ o"Eo tci .~~U U; ffi(l).E ~ a.1a [I) co OiSt:o;;;' ~ e-8 g .. u:8~6~ >-"0 :)a1-o i3 ffi m (0"5 ~ .. '" o ~ m Ui (/J >- ~-g~~~ -8~~~~ .!:~~(ij3: >-r::: Q) t: , ::;oCJU:~ w~:Siodo I r-._.~N ci-g86i-g ~'g.~~~ 00:) <( ,- .:..::g~(I)~ Q) t: Cll-... t: ~ ,2 E B Cll O.N-ro~g.E oCll;"E8.s 3: g, E 8 ~ t: iod~~ g>~ ~ ~ g>cau "13.!: >-'_ ,_ ~ t:':":: ID ~ c):t5::; 1ij ~ 2 (I) 03: > 8..~ ~,~ ~gro:ro:O::; oC\l Q) ...... 3: ,..~ 3: s al '0 g ffi '8,E ,,-O..l::Z" 0 ID .....~I- ffi;::; 0 ~~t::E:(I) UC")lO~:.c; @J$:!::ro:......-o t:E~o.affi ,2 <IS 0 1a 'Q5 a. cao ID(I) 0:) ijj ~ al t ~ Q) ~co..~t:~ .- 0.:..:: 0 8.. U ;Z08cn:JID Clltci......>.:.::iii ~~.~~ !R~ Oa.t:"03:ID 0) I- 2i 6'~ iE <( Z 0 (.):5.!:2 '" . '" '" - <f..S m~ - = .... c! ~ = 0 ~f- = ::; "0 ffi c 8 UJ U)_ . ~s ~ 20 g-g Ci5.:..:: :;::;q .:..:: m 0.... (1),,- .s~ ~ 0 Li <Il ~ OoE6~ ~~~~5 c: 0 a: 0 Co ~.~ i...: ~ ,_ ~..I:: 0 ~~Ji~~ Q)o:::S:::c"E tt3:~88 ~ ~ ~ ro: ID ~ ~~ ffi ~ 5 ~ ~ 2 ~ lS'~ 5-g ffiro2~~ g t:"O Q) ,- :>.g a: g--g s ~ . g ~ >-...-0-0..0 ~~~js o ~ ~ ,,~ {3 <IS'" <Il t: t: Q) 1l E ,2 ~..c ,_,~! 'O'~3:;g~ =~CE{3o g~ft!5'O _.:..:: CS a. 8 .~~32 g>~ Ol (I) -6:~ z ,~ m t: ~ cO t:t:CllQ)O "6l'oo-O "- 0 Q):)C:;S:C\1 .olll(ij2oi -g"ciOCll~ &!~~o~ fllocgt:.o 15"~ ~ ~~ 5>g rn ~ 6 ~8~ ~~" ... o'~=,!: ';;: {3 u:5 E ti ffi:a'~ 2 IDa:... a)"::= 'e'-ro ~Q) ~ a. "0 ,!: a. "'8 .~ <IS ti E ';:: ~&'~ 8 2i ;II. .... '" - ~~ ~;:! - ~ IS rn ;; U) c o .., "' '" a; o '" N '" ;;; = m ~'~~0' -&'(E~::' d....e ~ ~B~-E EoY.l-O 5>1ll.;.,; Q) ~~5g> Q)W 0 Cll a:..Ec} 1a.9~-g &!~~~ ,~~ ~ 8: 000<( l'I ~ ~ " - c ... ~ ,gS~ID sJ!! ID-o .0 Q) E Q) E :g - S ~~~~ 2i~-g t: - .1- 0 S: 'S ~ ~ Q).2 gj Q)-g ::::Clll!?::=s:~..t: -a-5U5jgQ5U5g ';:: 2"E 0 t3 -.~ ~ ro: e -;; 8. e ~ o"8u.(I) t:u. 0_ ~~~g-5~S:"g ':> 0 0 3: 0"0 <IS eg~g21-~~ a.<IS-(I)-o320ID 000'-;::00"- Q; -;;-g"O:g g>~'S t: Cll :) E.o ,_ <Il"O l!!=Oo~iil<ll=t: -0 Q) i! ~ (I) ~ 'S 8 t:E......oS:t5,-o.... gO) 5"'C ca Q) a ~ .0 ,!: (I) t: t: .c:: 0'- W iil 0 :).2 = Ol< m1Fc;.8:g'~:E g> _ ro:; -0..... U'- CllQ)O:)ro:-o=-g 6:5c:g~E'E(I) :;::; ~.~ lO - ::; 8 oS 'Ei =0 t: ..... -0 ...... I- >. -00 Ci ~ &3 <Il iod (ij Cll E == 0 <( I- :) ~<IlCllc.2"ci<(&3 t)~~ ~~.g ffi--:l :)Q)..t:CllEQ)Q)o .;;:g:g8~g'g 6Cllt2:)S:Cllo(l) ~i.O'O..8gQ;-g~ 3:Z3ijj.~;g>. _"'00 m 0) g>~.o .~5~ca'~'5 ~-g ~.8 ~ 6 ~~ 8l! <Il=EE~;;::Q)o..E ,- :) 0"0 t: m.o ~g.J:::-gCllJ:;s8 '" . '" '" "'.... . 0 "'- "':: m ...... 'S; ';: = III C Q ::; '" c go ~ rn f- 13 ... .." o Ol~ ~ -e a. .!: m g- ffi~.~"O -0.- t: ~~J]ro:tci -o"5.:..::~~ ~SfJ v.~ a: ;:;;:2 ~ r-.~ "~- @ ~~ is 0(E$ Ol ~i5 6~ C)~Su~ ~U5~.E; g6"E~~ ~u:88iS '" - N o ~ ... ~ c. E ~8 E _ m rn ~ ~ ~~ ~g -> SLci ci> w c "E (I) .-& ~.NE 8~~ ~:Soo t:...e L1J~"'" cao~ ~ ~'Q5 0:2:5 ~.Bca e ~ 2 <(-;::'0' m 0 ~ ~-g' ~ orn~ a. ~ ~ ":;:0 a o~ 8 '~1a<( 0. 0)'13 m C C ;'g ~ '0(1)0 t:;r-: ~~~ 8..s-- .~ ~ ~oc f-oo ;II. o '" '" . o ~ ~ ~ == ~ ~~ E m E '" o a; ~ C UJ 0> C '0 C m u. m 0> ... d5 ~ o ~ <Xl '" '" '" o (f) a. S: 0<0 ~O o u.~ 00 !:;: "'~ WO Cl <( l1. I- W W J: en en en w 0: Cl o 0: "- ::.::: 0: o ~ > <(....I ....IJ: ~I- OZ wO :i:i w, I-en 11..1- 00 >w 1::0 00: "- en I- Z w :i w > o 0: "- ~ ....I <( l- ii: <( o y............y t;.<tt> ... .~" .. >J!' ........ .... 8~> .....~:.;..:... :::::~::~::~:< .j!i.." )~~r :0::':':.:' .M",... ~J;i;;j:::::::: :::::::S::~<:> g:;z :"':::.... tll( ~o :':':':i;:I:>c;):' II ::::::::::~ .....~ :-:-:'>>=., :<<<Q;,i.;." /< c ~ ~ .c 2 ~ .!:5! ~ a~ o _ e:.~ roo; ~~ - - g.!: ~~ ~ . ~ - ~~ ro~ "'" ~o E c w:i: t~ 0_ ~ c E .Ql <<llllo, c, C ~ S 'E - o. 8 8"(/)..r::; ~~"E i'~~ ~ ~ ~ (1) c ~ -:5~.2 ,,"uU ~-gY ;:;;;; m"O' 3:~a: o.21-ci .~1lI Q) e ~Q5 0.;:0.. -~ Ql E ~~8 :::::> ::::: ~ c~:: g.- < = ~ ~ ~ Cl ~ ~ .. E "'< J!l .E :::; I '" ..... 5 ~ -g.!:: Em':; ~5~ !:2 (I) Q):g ~ C:<CUj _~~ :5 '" .. ~ Z 0 "'s >.~ o~r-.. (/,)..:lI::O ~~E -g.!!!~ ro ~ ~ .. II) ~ r6 EO. c>5~fP. ~~ $ ......~ (ij < Cl N.(I) c ~ (I) ..... 00 Q)"c !5f(~~~ [;'I-~~; c..r::; E c: <) ~j 0 ~ l! Qi""C ~ 8.s ai J]~~'~~E "'ffioc-g::'E 8 [?2 <<l,E 0 ....Jcow16(J <<l~':~.= ~ @ Ci5 ~ en 5- <<IE .!!! O:J Q) g~~E~.!Q -ca...-co..c= .9 cj ~ ~ 6i' g '0 a: 0).2 E II) 50:6~5'~ o Q) rn:.;:::;:;; c ():E en 0 ~ II) ~1ij a>:gE ~ o 5:5 a:l~ ~ CD'- CD"O . 0 :S=6~~~]! 1:1 5 a. c 0 :::::I ~O~~()~ E-go~E~ e..2.9"U e's 0.-..... Q) - > r-.. li5 ~.~ 5 ~ .e 5l ~ ~ ~.Q o@!:'::NlZ C\JEO'@Ci:J .,....c()Ci5..c~ c:J'E '5'5 o C Q) r--: <tI = <<lEot5Q) ~.s~~~E .- Ql .... -.. Q) ro: &-6~~=13 >'- . o o ~ >'- . o >'- . o o ~ >'- . o o ~ E ~ .. ~ == ~ ~~ ~ u C ~ '" ~ E w 6' a: e. 0 Qi .E E C ~ ~ 0 ~ K~ o "5 ~ fd tff~ ~ OJ.......- (.) C Q) c: ~'Bg.l5 >. ~ ~ E 'E~.9-; ;;) Q) (,) U E c ttl ttl E@-E-E o..coo aQUa ~ .b o 1E ~ ~ o 1E -- C g C o ~B.Q ..c: c 0.. t) g .2 c.E C2 m"@ ~ Q).2l::2: 0 a5 oS.l: Q) (.) Q) -0 Q) 20 !~;5~:S: E.!!2 ~LCI) a? -lj ..Ill "a-; .g >. Q) '- ..-.0 O~.sB~ .s.::.c.....i3 .~ 5.s * 5- ~o~~ g- ::2"8a1ii~ 0l.Q U Cl. a:l eLL. Q)'O CJ) ~ ~;5'c @ J!!3=~o.. "@ O'~ c .::. 0 Cl E.Q ~-2:l.S 2 ~ '-"1jj -t: ~ '>: ~ Q5 ow.:: c > s: . Q) <<10:(1)0= c -0 ';':s: Q) rn (tl.~o u EoOa:c :ga:m..cO frrJF g>ai (I) (5._ e iD ;g-oE=o.. .5ffi~E~ "C alom ~~~-E!::g Ua::EgJ$ID '~.~i3 ~~ ~ 0.."'" a:l e(l)o .E 12 0..2, U ~7ijg-g~~ 1-0W C'I:l..c 0 .... o ;;;- >,-0 ~g - ~ .. eOl~ = ~..... .. ~ ~ ~'"E < '" .. .,; .. .,; o '" - "e 0 f-E ~ . _Cl O.S c.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a. ~ E"g> ~w :20 ~~ ~ 06 ro- .~ ~ t:'E ~ 0 :20 ~ "i ~ Q ~ Cl)O Q) m ~ -= c> C .~ 'ij3 0 1lJ"'C ~ g> ro~ 8.:g 11'Qjt5 ~ &. ~ ,@,.!!2 n:l~(/)5 'E(5(ij~l1 ~~gEE c3r-:<8~ 1'--1:i a. ~.e~~~ glO.8r-::o r;;l- (l) C a: ~ 5 ~ 65~o~ ~~.~.~~ .::g..cUo..u; ~ ~ 5 ~.s "m s: ~ ~,g .0 .~.s~ ~ ~~~;E ~ E lS'~ 8 .~.~::2 -g:s ~g:&i.N1ti ~ -&5,g ~B ;j55~a R 0 (,).0 ~~~~:g 'e:; ~ ~ 0. cU)- .~ t5 ~ g '0 -:Em(l)=1ij (ji:S:o~> -g ~ ~3 ~ ~a..:S.Ee? .... o ~~ o~ S ., -= to >,'oQ) "'C ~ ,.... Cll-o ~ ~@ Q)'8""O~ ~g?<<lo1il:5E@1:: Ca e::~ ::15.9 (/j.g a..&<C-.~8'E~g ~:~~~~~ID~ U~->,(/j:;J:;J"""C ~ :: c:': ~ (/j (/j,g 0 c:: (!lcg().c.~ BOO~:B I-.Q~~~ou-g..s!2 ~~.j5o~a~g.B7i) .;: ~-:; ;o<UI u1ij:g 6 -:;UJ~'E .(/j-@ ~.~u "Om,-(!lQ)~@~oo .3.g.E E ~E:: ~=...... *&i~~85~~~ E*5--6 a..9-:;-OE E () Q) Q) Q)"O.~ ~ '-.E :::l_'-:2-:;Q) -o:mQ) 11"Ec<1 i3"O'E ~~~.c .;;~~5...~~:g1a~~ +-' ~ (/j E '- 0 :: (/j U ~ 5 t5 c.c.E :: -0 ~ (/j ~8~jgiiiffi~~.ffim ffi1tlUJ~~~:[)~g a.. 'E~ . -g (/j:: ~ >,5.. ~Q)a..8:~~6~o~ C E Q) -- (/j...... CIl ~ ._ ~eFS]3:<-g.s~ [i.~r-..:'; E ~g E 8~ a..UJooE..:<:;;Ec= ffi<D~(I)8~~go-g :2FO)-~mc;(.j5~ui~ ~ti::~~U.S.9.~= ~~.i5..()-a:tU~Eui "0 a: <(.9.9.E 6 S!! 6>@ <D~c"O~ ;;a.Q)~ .00c)oQ)"tJ~uc'-m 5..@<(.~66.EgC() (I).c$Ea.....(I)~$E :c [i:c-g (/j & 6.~() 0 I- a.. LL (I) ~ ~ u..... a:..l:: .... o o - . .... o o ~ '" :. ~.2 ~ ~ ~ ~ "'- 0 ~ ~ E '"< ~ E :c: ,g .. ~ - Cl C ~ ro 5 0~ ~ ro u ~ ~ u. ~ 0.0. ." _@I 1il 0 c2 ~ ~.- 0 E .~ 0 ~~ '" >- 6~ .~ III 5..(3 10 E.9 '" fa + ~~ :2 ~ :c: ~ ~ :2 ~~ 0 !:2 ffi ffi ;,; 0.0. 13 ro ro E Cl- l! @ ~ ."5 Cl -5E-g[!:! ~ Q) <D 0 0 2: a..1-a:() UJ III - ~ frl ~ s: .,. a ~ ~ ~ . [f "'" ",e;. '" o '" o o '" a. ;;: 0= _0 o I1.N 00 !:;: - o '" W Cl <t D.. I- W W :J: C/) C/) C/) W 0:: CJ o 0:: D. ~ 0:: o == > <(....I ....I:J: ::)1- OZ wO :!il:!il w, I-C/) ll..1- 00 >W !::3 00:: D. C/) I- Z w :!il w > o 0:: D. ~ ....I <( l- ii: <( o ':::: .:......: ::,,::::::::: I.......,............... ~II t.l:-;:.:- <<.~:-~]::> J!i.. , >~ll ~:;/? ......,.z.. /?~::~:::> .....~ .....~ :.:::::"< '~" ~f:::: / ~ ~ <<l ~~o>g ~ ~ ........... t:: Cll..:::.:: .!:2 (j) III '13 allll g !il ~ 2:S ":'::~ffi 'O'g'2E13(/)li:i~ ~J- 0) ao O"ffi c~ E";:: O-o<<l@l::-cEEl!!>,Ql-6 >Oil> 0 Q)"O..... 0..- <Il ~..:.:: 0 :;--~= t::"w(ijO m f:? =a ffi ro Ll) .Ql~ ::S c: a> III ~ >~~~:!:E.E g.EU::~ ~ 3:0 _...... Q).... ..c...c o15"--g3:.8~~6~::.S! s:cEa~=2"""'~f:;::.gQ) ~~ m ~.!:2 :s:_~ g=a:;:::-mla ~~E~:E ~ E'~"@o'ffi E o 5 e Q) ~ (;j lu:m "0;":':: 0..8 ;ij1ij':;: ~~ i6~(J)..c ~ g.;::; ~"g ffi:: S a ib 6 ~ S: ~ 3: ctlroQ)g2:;::::m~.S~I-~ ~g~:2'Uj.~Eg~~ui~ ffi:!1 Ci? 5.~.!=.g"E ~'E ~ K ";::: Q);::...... c: 0)"0 :::::I ~.~...."'C~<<lo..O)$"OEQ) > 11.1<<1 c:;::::"o= Cf.Ic.....-o:5 =- c: >. ('Ij'- C'S; 0 Q) ffi Q).... iDom Ectl:>Q.E......c:O t:fii~ m 8,~.~KE~.~Q) '0.210 <<l:g"a.O Q) 8 C Q) g} 15E;;::.~io~i?:S1::8~e :;;; "O-"O(/)-tan::lQ)O::J gl? @ ~~-g-o:s~:5 Q:~ ~1- cEa:l!!2,,'c 000 (/) "mE :=00(1)0)--- cOo. .!!! in 21ij'Uj"2E f:? 8'~-g ~~z w'ti) 0:9 !!! 2 IDa:..QCQ)>.60~6~O "O_-.!QoS'-=: 00 > c..t::"O:>. .2 (l) Q):5 co.~s: (If Q) 0 c: tis o 0>';:: '0 0 Q) m ..c.... () ctl ::J .r=. !!! t:: Q) Q) -= ~ ~ fP' ~Q) 2 t:: oU):E~o>'(\jC)..c: -E~(\j (j) , :!::: .... coo L1....... (I)"'C a."""') "0'- 3" a.(\j-o 6c)"'C'E (j) E15 .... l1l___a.c ~.-Cl: c~...... 0 c.c~(\j2-orti (\jE~o..c: (I) @ ~ ~ .~ .5 .~ e m E ~ 3" c ~<3o~ ~ ['E ~~ 8 Wg ~ '" . on '" ;Ii. on '" ::z,s ~Q- l)"j ~ "'- ~ ~ ~ E m" J!l ~ ~ E ~ a E ~ ,~o ~Cb 0", ~ ~ N .~ ~Y.r "C 3: ~ E I:: >.L1. .9.Q ,-g"'C .., en ~E @ i;'EE"g ~:2:0N (ij]jC:8 a. ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ cc.=: ,., m 0 ::l ..c: ,!::: ~ g E: 0 a.wo ~ ~ ~ ,;, ~ ~ N Ul (j):p C"'C ,!!! c."'C c 2 @ ouj"EaS~ g(j) o .ro:o-oro:~~> -=>.....~crti(l)ro:o ~(l)"S-Ero:"'C~-o...... .c..c: Ul ~-o >.m c';8'E$~m=~ .....c ~....oQ5m"'C ~~S~~.~'5~d5 OO.8~-:;%~oS-ai ~3:cO"""UlaOJl1l 2_" ~ >.Ulo.l2_ c,'"::, ~....... Ul:;:::: 0 c ,- I..J EO~l5~en~E.s E L1. (j) l::: .... <( ~.g.!!! o ~ 3: ~ Ul Cl: = 11l l::: o (l)o~o~a.~ E-E'E,!!2OLlJ~.8:2: e.~ ~ c M:c'R_~ -cE.~~~..c::=...... (l)oE~.c..c::Q)3"(j) 'f: ~ 8 'Ot-:,E ~ li'g C1.~~~-ai-055~ "C"Eg......(I)~oO"'C ffi O..c:: ....,.'"::, -g m ~ Ci3 ;::Oo~'-"-c..c::o (l)Oca;<<lgm-.o b~~g~.~g:.EM 15 ~ ...c:::s lB 5"E:: "ci cC)-gr:.:~.oo.s('l')~ .Q2!'s8 5Q> ~"32'5 ~,!!! O'"N- >'oS ~ m e ~ l::: ~ >.i}''O >. 0 oS C. x::l 00 ffi ~ c..c 0 >',!!2 ~~'~ ~U5 ~-gJlEo oS~li5<<HI)~1i5~~al o ~"""') <( =, 0 ..... m (ll'ao'f:g ~$'; ~ ~~Jj:E@:B'8 ~ $<i: g:O_6:C.a~~o.gj =moE~roUl~m.E g..c::&~:EUl.-l1lQ5~ 'E'j 8 oS :g ~~ ~ '5 :$ a."'C >.~.t::!'(ji 3: g::z: ~ ~ ~ E '~ ~ is ,Ul @ .... ,~ 1-Cl:<("O:;:5oSo.E:o '" . o '" '" . o ... .. ".... Q) () CD ~ ! 'SS ~ 0 UJ n $.,1- m .. :; u a: ~ ~ ;5i5-E! 'O.9m ~~~ ~ l5 6 000 u~~ @ ~.~ ~ E ~ ~E~o d58,~'8; ~Eec.O $ea.~ O~"E{:f)- .s.Q.:m '0 Ql Ul ~ (Ij 'E l5 ~ E ::l X 0 0 :2woo ~ '" ~ " ~ ~ Ul Jg I:: ~ c. 3= ~ ~~-ai8 (5~ o"'C ~ Ul.!:2 -::.iSt)~,!:2LlJ:2 "'" ~"E .~ Jl ~ E E~ 0 Ql c.......;:: 0 (Ij. 3" E 'E ~:s.::::s ~-5 g- o',3::Z:,g ~ ~:i: Iii o ~ Ul ro: 0 c 3: 6; Ql ~ -..... "'Co <<l -'0 (ij a. Ql"'C..c"""') c Ul .?;-E,~~ ~.~:8.;S C3 3: ~e;"$'~E I:: Q) '0 W 5.. c Z Ql 0 =*15Ul~ ~6 '0 '0 Ul <<l c.s"'C'_ c 0 a...c:: 0 Ul ___ <<l ~gj 5e.5~;g E W<<lO'EC5'<tS! :s: :g >. 02.3: <<l.5 ~~E03::2.Eli5 OJ Ul <( "8 <(.!!! >...c:: ,~.~~.2fiL;;:=5 $g-~..c::3:~L1. .5 ~ 8 'E ,2 <( ;:15 ~'5'::::15~O<<l..c:: w.....Qlt);>wE3: 0..... E 11l OJ8~Qlo~t5E 15"'Cl!~':::5,!!?"oO 3= I:: ~.... .3:..... Ul 1::.~.eJL~o ~gj ~ .5 .~ a: m ~:s g OO'~ e ti ~ 8 < a.a.OJ-Ul (I)'!::: o li5 ~.E ~ ~ <<loSS! '" '" . ~ 0 on "'''' '" . 0 ~ 0_ on~ - " ~ .. .. ~ N_ ..!!< u"C ':; ';;:: ~ ~ ..m "' ~ o Q C E :; .lS" i5 ~ .(ji .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .a5 Ql Q) Q) E E .~ ~.sU') &i~!ij~g OJ'" .l= ..... N ~ c ",- 15"E C\l o ~;;08~ '" .. ~ 15_""'C\j('l') :Q E c ci 0 ci Ccca515=== - Ql -- E c c c $ E"E <<l Ql Ql Q) .l=~2!t5EEE (f.lM'S~'g-g'g ca.Ul.....QlQlQl .ffiQl615EEE :2~uo<(<(~ ~ ~ " .. ~ ~ :;; on 9 '" ~ o q :; .... '" -"' ~ . gg (J)~ "'<( Q5'g ~ .. o~ .95 ~:I: ,Q >. ~ ~ !fiE ~::2 "g"E o.:m a: ~ N ~ .!!! 6 00 ~ S "0 ~ ... 'in ;; ~ " ~ S ~ o E ~ u ~ ~ 0. ~ U ... ~ ~ ~ E o o .~ u ~ c Q) -g ro: Ql t5 c 01112 g 00=...... Ul :g.9~~-g 1::.~ 8 ~~ ,,~E~ ~ 2!~gE8 @ a. c (f.l Q) OO8~5~-g ~,~ t5; 3" <<i o OJ,~Ql 00.;:: (ij 1::0:;::: oa. oo.ffi 5...E g" e @ ~,!:2 -goo 8: .- ......c:: U) al:l <<l 1Ji<<lI-U)Ul'O -8'~.E~@@ 8.= <D 13C::~ "'C ~ a.._ <0- @ ~"E ~ ~ ~ ~~~:a~:Q g,'~ -5 ~,.... ,!:2 .2OJ~~15~ ~,g 5 . -@:g S!ffiJj~5.2 'ffi ~c~-= .l=....ctl"E<('E m 2! '0 -8 ~ ~ 'Oc3~'a;~-g .E"ci~ffi~~ ~~a.UlO..c: 8 a: 1Q 'g g ~ _<<l..c:::)<(..c ~'EOQl13= t5 ~L1. ca_ 3: Ql (ijo fr~t5 "0':2: a: (I) o.!!?, 5...... e al g. e ,!:2-8.~s @ ~ t:s~s~-5 = ~ ctl.:?;- ~8. :g 0 i: a. p~ ,!!! ~ out.> ~ ~ '2~ 0... ,~ g ~iil ;Ii. '" '" '" . '" '" ~ ~ == ~ ~~ :;; u ~ ::> -g o a: :m O>~ ffi c <0 OJ 'C N ffi lEv. :;E .5 ~ "'- E Jj~ "* z"E (fi :5 5 E ~ OJ~~ 17 .~s ~ =iS~"E ~ ..... 0 0 ::Z:uoo '" ~ eo ~ " '" '" ~ ~ " l(l ~ ~'~ cOoS ~~u 2.J::Ql ~t-= ~ .- ~ . E >'6".0 ~ .. ~ ~o~ -5~1Q ._..c: , 6 E oo.?;- :ega:::> 6 O(ij Ql a.C) u:i= Eoc>. Q)..c::.!!!..c ..c:: 0 a."'C -g@ro~ c a:,~ Ql ~15~.~ :::-:;=.... O~COl - 0 0.5 >. 00 A Q) '0......00.0 .3 ~ a: >. ~'-::::lE lil::E~ E Ql <<l ~ ~~s ~ .- 00 U) ,_ (ij >.13t:: @ 150 8. Ql..c:: ~ ~ Q50......Ul 15..E.9:E ~e2t-: o~l::t:: " ~ 0 ,s:.g E ar ;:"E E a: ffio8(i3 "O'C)"O .~ 5..gj~L1. Ul <<l '5'::: .- a. 0 ctl t:~5..Ci '" . o '" '" . o '" ~ l! ::;: :;; E " ~ u ~ /jj ~ ~ E ~ .'" <i:ao 5 .~ ~ :g 8.~ 55~ 00.. gj~~ ~? ~ OJ"E<( E,g!~ 2~.l= ~ c c 3=88 '" '" ~ ~ " '" o '" o ;; (f) a. ;;: ~ ~ (j)';; ..c: ~ @ggj-;;;"gN3i E 1L If) ~ :s:'u !<l a ~ .>'Q) E-(ij (5 Ci50~o~Ec:o ~u_ 'ia-g ~ a. :5-~ ~-5~"O g, _C(\:lQ)=~<tI.- o.!!! a. E.~ O"C 115 ........a.. f/lcO"'" Q)"C o..'Eto .Olo..-c :2: Q) O.!::: r-- C E C fe.E&2:~'~ e~ Ul Q) Q) Q).....- 0.$ Q)~..c C1)C\i 6s (I) l:: ~l:::.s....~~Q) gmrocc.!!?..cE .....::::2: Q) 0 0:::: (/J 5 a.~c~"C.s a>.!::: +-'--"'20 Q) 00 "0 > ffi~'S:s:E...;ffiffi ~og.s.5@~~ ~$~ID~'5~~ clU'ii.iE~~.8o as ~ rn:.l:> Q) S -'" 0 ~ Q)~ 6 3: ~t) "ti-S-CQUlCQ)[ Q) k+-' . C Q) ... E m1Lg>~,g E >..- ~o..EQ5~$~t5 ..... a.. '(ij 1-= Cnc ~ g>3:~ 6 &<x: IDW ';:::~>.m ctl'@ E.::i .9 ..c....;':!::~~.... (I)@a1cEc'-o ~a::o.sffic5-3 Ul 0'3 c.<C ~o-o Q) 5::> Cfj >. Q) c Q) Q) "'!:!;;:;;o:>csa=Oc..s .:::: c ..... 0)',0;; 0 E gg!o1\1~.s~~:n U l!! 1:: 'E 0lJ::!.:e C (j) Q) 0.. (l) Q) l!! -.:=; E.2"'C '0' c E E ,.::l Q) t5 Q) a.~.~6~jB.E~ .!!? ~ g."5 g 2 ~ ~..... ~ ~ l!! a5 a.:c d: 8 ~ 0 <Xl ~ 0 <>< 0 LL ~ 0 0 ~ .... - ~ w 0 0 ::::< ,> <( c. I- W W ::J: C/) C/) C/) W 0:: Cl o 0:: c.. ~ 0:: o :s: > <(..J ..J::J: ::ll- OZ wO :::: w, I-C/) u..1- 00 >w t::6 00:: c.. C/) I- Z W :: w > o 0:: c.. :: ..J <( l- e:: <( o .::::.. ... .... > :~.~.:.. :":i.'!>;~> 8",.. .n...... ~I~ hiif ~r;;;L-:-: ......,.z..... :jU:~~:~cr :-:-:~. .....~. "# o '" - ~8 ~~ - E! .. ~ =8 - m ;:'" ]l o Iii f 01 -:-:-:.r;Q:.Gid" ~ ~ fit ~ >:::~:~~>:- ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ .:.I.I.i.1 Ui!u! -'*' :Q~ogc~g <<l Q) . C Q) .:.:' c aClE';oEmo ........ C::O/SW9~Cl9 . .....~ HI ii< ):::~:: '" - .;, o ~ m = 1a~l5 _ -ffi C"O Q)'- Q)O',E 1a 3: Q ~8'E:~ cu :) III a.() "ID'Ogj<<lQ) '~.5 ~.B':: 2I1lo:lli;~ .... 3: C >_ ~~2~-g ~ ~ ~:s! ~o$1!!:Q ~~~~c 3:~;:::IIl~ro Q)"'" 0 8..- 0 cV?c....=o <<l (5.9.E ~ C\J 'O'S'OIll.2~ ca..~5~~ ~'Og~~fij 01::0:;:;--:1 :) 0 o. ~'(jj ~ ar-g.!: ~a5~ci3m 8 ~"5 ~ m:o -gcfJ:o;:~ ell ellQ) 1j3o_ C "0 € a. C i!! .Ql fij III "0 ~ 1j3 ~ 00 cu (53: E "OO)~..c_c Q) r-.. l:... C a5 0 €d:~~E'5 1Il.....=Q)Q)C Q) 0';:: Q) Q) Q) ~ III ..c 0,"0 gE:EUlellfij .5'E -.]g ~ C -g Q5-g-g .'~ 'e-i.g'e~~ o.li; ~ 0...Qt:: .~(;)~.~~~ ~~8~~~ "# '" '" ~~ "'I- ~ .. .;; " o .: ~ ~ m m o * .C 51ij ::; c ~ 0 m.- >1iio QCN lDffi<6 "'-.... "OEr-.._ ~~~ 0-'''' gj~:': g;..E IDc<C c rn_ Q5S ~ - 0 ~ UlI::C moo ;: tH' 9 ~ ~ '" "," ::= 3l 2 g><~Oc~ g>w III ';:: E ~ i!! :: ti~~'~B~~~ 'x I- a. 5; :) I- C 0 Q) Vi..... .... III 0 ell Q)E~2:>lDtlO~ ..c :).5 Q) Ul .:: Q) ~.~.!:2'~F<( lfl~.sl@al~:2ro-g ~<<lWoo,~~g~ as E () i- Q) E III C\J ~ :):) -".. ,..c..c ell >'Q) o-..c :!::!-r-.. i- :) 3: .... 2 Ul Q) I:: -S! Vi III ~ o5:)oc,~~c€ o E E:!:::.9..c:;::;: CU.- o EC\l--Q)-:l3:: -v.slo......fS"OQ)c"o >. ell () c.,:::: C E'- Q) Q) -g Q) 0'0 <<l ell.sl 16 rnE€~2l..~"O~:g .5EOU::Ul~ffiEg; goc"Og..c"Ooc .... 8 0 C 0 Q) 0 0> 8:: ell "0 C 3: ro c ell 0 (l) >..5.sg Q)..c'a; "0"'" Ei Q)~ o.'>=..c ~ffiEm~C\J~3:.~ cQ){/) CI::CI:: =Q)..c"O.~lflQ)<<l~ 3:()=c-..cllc..ID g~'~~~~gj-g"O 'e-S ~~U~~'S @ a.EOJsro~2~31 ~ ~-gID~~'ei? 5 I- () ell .9 i- I- a.i- I '" . '" .... ~~ 0_ ='" - ~ m ~ Q :E ;;; c o ." c ~* W ,- 0 (jig<=! -IIlOO a5~~~ () "0 aPO ~@~ci: :)ffiV'7r-.. E >..;...: V'7 E (l) 0 .. o:2JGi () ,. 1::- (tic 0 ffi "5i!!~E 0"5~-g Q) Ul._ Q) E I:: 0> E ~8o<c 'C <DOl 00 h o '" ~ c ni '0 'i 1:: ~.~ ~.........:)~~ <<l(l)C 0 CU"O ~~~~~g ~E~~'EU "O(tIO>CU:) 2 ~li;ellQ)Et5 > I:: "0 E I:: wO~~88 Q) ~ ~.!:..:.:: Q) E gjE-fi 3:;: cu..c 0.'- CU 0 2:> o.g.~=5 C _0 Q)o ffi.s'ogr~~ 2 -g S:E ell @ .... "Co c..:.:: a. Q).s: () Q) @ ~ €:o~Eo.o. .5 UlO ~ EP~ m~~31~i- 'ijj5-:'~@~ ~t5.~~ OI~ a. 2 Q) €.!:: Iii 5~~'O~~ .E 0 r-.. Ul a.:) 0000> Q) 00 ;~ ~'~;Q rn .!!?+: .~~~ :gl1~"O~:) Q).!: .... C 0 '0 E ca ro 0 ca :) <<l~~t5<(ti "0 ro Q) 20 Q) ~ ~~ t5<"~ o..c 0.0 - CD aQ ui..... Iii ~-c .~ ~ [ij ~"t3 rn S ~o ~.a:~ 3l Ul '" . o '" . o ~ .. li ~ m E .. ,; .s ci: 11 5 wc!3 E c m ~ Ei'ii) 5..~W E~E ~.~ ~ 0: 0 8!. .. E ""~::: ~-Q ~~~ "Occ moo 0:0" <D o "'5 g ~.~-g '::;;"'ffiU III cu E III .2 3: ~ Q) 5 Q) Q) @ ~7a~-fi -7 E .:c: g.953: ~li1 -0 E .~-g .5~ .Ul ~ V? "0 ~ Q) 0> C Q) ~.!: m :5-g~m ~(t\a.. is ._ C I:: I ~'ffi 3: 'a~~~ E632~ ~UOti1 ~~~~ 2:-2"0- g.5 @ ~ . .!: (l) _ m ~ o€a5~o .!!?.rn E ~ ~ e III C g ell ~~ g 0 ~ :.c li; m.!!!.g I- a..a: :5 u. ~ - ~~ ga - " .. ~~ ~Q~ rn 0 ~~1- G:E J'l Q C. m m 'ed: a. m ~a5 2"0 Q c 2 rn U) g ~:;:::; E'a c E ~~ I-m :2(j5 0, ... o ch~ 0_ ~ ~ 0 ID C C rn c @c.. e ~c u."O Q) lD ~ >. l:: C E E C\J Q) , 3:caF~~~~ ~-ffi"OEtf130 :g ~ ffi g- , g>~ O~ 6= {,'l'a; 5.. O>_NQ)1ij.o<c g'~'ij5 ~ 0..~.5 1ijS>OOC\lC"O 1Il~€ ti.!::.g~ ~ 'O'~'s"5 g.9- ~t5 ~.~.gtig ."!:: ell 00,- C C 5~1ij~~8~ "0 lflws..c ~.- m~()=>==-g ~(I)OOG3:"5cu ~'~Vi:3-g~~ ~~$~'e-~'e- (0'0...._ o.ca. -c=(;)OlUoc C CU..c c..c 1:: (l) 5 uiw ~ '-: 8. E ~$-g[.~IIl~ Q) .... ca'(3:::: ->..... -g~-g~:s8~ :)_C\J o.ro-.- >.0:0 1::__..cOJ 1ii Q)"OQ)C-OQ) ~ffi~.~Q~ti ~"O"ID~~ffiQ) 1ii&i..c,="E_:5 _c'Q)Q)ell6..c "<;" Q) Q):5 ~.- ~ =- Q) ~ 0 t: > -0 3:00 ~- 8."0 .!!?.~~]j W.1Il ~ ~....;--g ~E g.!:; .!!! ~ ~:; ~:5 ~ ~Ci5~ffi~w8 ,;0: Z ~~ "'.. - " rn m-' == CD ~ ~Q... ","0 ~ ~... G:E o " m '0'-0 a::s (l) .~ ~c 2~ Q- 2~ 1;;::> ~-g c ~ - 0 c ~ ~ '" o m 1-" "0 c -::> 0, ... o char ~- l1. <Xl o '" o o (/) a. S: 00) ~O o lL~ 00 ~ "';:: WO Cl <( D.. I- W W J: en en en w a: C) o a: Q. ~ a: o 3: > <(...I ...IJ: ::ll- OZ wO ~~ w, I-en lL.1- 00 >w 1::6 Oa: Q. en I- Z W ~ W > o a: Q. ~ ...I <( l- e:: <( o 000 >:<: t ..'B:: ) :~.<?' "~It~< 8,... "':..:.. '>>~>~::r\ l!J"':c <~I[ l~< ......,.z.. ;/i:~:i~U) :.: ~ ~ (ij~- 5-~.~ (\I Cl(f.).....- c: ~ c: .g'E;S 5 ~ "C ~ (\j..c '3 Q) 7ii ~~E1EUl~'fr o Q) 0 UJ 0..'- L.L.~()~~.:.::"E . Q) Q) 0 (tl ~-g6M5]!~.~ ~ ~ii>a: ~'~L~ ~Ec*8i5g "ffi ~(3 liS 0 J;; :::a:: (l,) E'- >. U) 3= (J 0 Q).~ 5: c6(.1):~o~Oo ~co~g?~ . "CQ)IDO)(j).....~ QlE€O'l-cEo ~~o~ffioC\J mo ('Ij ..l::..c ~5.;~~~~ 6.~ ~.$'5;:O~ (J) Q)..l:; c........~ c@o...Q5;::;,g:2 Q) :::I ... Q) ;:: 0.0 E C".E :;; >. (f.I .s ~ 00 ltl (f.l.~.9"U e~~.....:Oc2 a.o<<lgcci.Q::I E I- (II "5'0 tiS-g m~~ a~'~-fi ~;~~;:::~~ '0 c:,t='.::o 0"5'- mnl-;ffi'5<Ug ~t"OQ)~5'5' :::IO:::::l,t=Ql......... g~~~~il~ t5:S6:i:s~F .~ui"ts,ern~r-: ~22~.;;;cA~ U'l a. in 8..E ~ C\J .- ..... c t,/).o Q)__ F 5.. 8 ~ ~ ;::;: '" Q '" - #~ g~ .. ~ -' " G)--; oed!: e (; Dl >01- " .. ~ ::; " ~Ii Ii -:.:-:-~>~:: a... Q) . ::)~~::~>:::' ~ ~ ~ (tl ~ ~ ::<:~:tr:;:: 2 11:E ~ c f2 I~f Iii!! ~.E~ ~.~g :Qoo~~~15 ............0 oi5 00 ..........~ <.:-:.:-:~ if :-:-:-:~<.' sur ~; ~o ,,-- .5 t:: 15 ..... "* 1ii c.E .9 0..'- ~ gjE~ ~ " .. iij'EJi eBB:: e.g <<l :: g 'E ~u ~ ~ ~ -cz."E; Iii 00 ~ Q) 6 E .2 ~ M 15~e ~:Jg :.o(l)Ql ~.3=,2 .:::cc ~ ~~~ ~ E .a...J~* 2.~'S ~ 02 gt:: O)o.......ffi .::: Q5 ~-o ~c(UE ~<3 ~ B (U 00 (I) o:~..t:: ~ 20.- _ 0t::=='O t:: == Olt:: 80 t:: (U ~~1ii '3=5~ ~ o......ot:: .~ 0 N.2 ~'; ~~ .ra lQ ~ ;U F -a~ = "'''' ~e NN .. " -' " (1)-. c" ~ ! o~ >1- " .. " ::; " li> ui E 00 " " o g oB. '$ t:: 0.2> i?~ -" 15~ ~ ~ -(I)ui ~ ~ c lQ ~.Q li~~ ~ - ~ .EllJn> E.~ .g ~g~ ~ 0 " 00:" .g~ffi .~:: ~ gg~ t:;~ 5 ceO 00;;::: ~~:S ffi.Ql ~ t:: ~ E .Ql.o 1ij llJ -ci at- -0 2i -0 .s~~ ->- ~ " '" .O'~ .~ 5..c :a (1)= t:: :c3:;;:::: -_00 ..... 0 .- -8 .~CC c:2~ :::lc.z '" . - "' ::Reo . 0 N_ Ne (I) ~-o ffi ~o_ .- -a. . a-o ~ == -0 a -.: -0 i;':;:::: ~ >.M g ~'ii5 ~ 5 ~ ~'E (1;1.......~ _.21'-- ..8 .......~.g 3: ~ 2 ~ ~ 0) "'ii5 a.. ;:: en ~ ta ~ O)UJ.::: ell as -0 (I) (lJ..t::.~ ffi 1ii E (I) O)t::.c a..-..t:: ~oE t::t::ell_ ell ffi :: .9 5 -g ~ jg i;'.:=; [J "C..E Cl Ul 0) 0 == Ul (l)0)a.. =20) mcf~~ ~.~5 'E8.c "E"ga.. E ':;~~ ~:;::"3= .a iS~"2 0.5 (I) .!!! ~ c .c t:: '" >. O)..t:: "0 E tU 1:..t:: ell 6> .'!:!.....~ ~G~ .~~g.w ~~?i ~8~ OUla.."g :;.~'~ui5s0 J;.91ti~ .... E..... (I)'::: t:: Ql 15~~Q5 .;::.c..... 0-0 (I)..t:: t:::J 3:15. -g~~~ccE~ g~~E ~lQ5(1)~a~ gO)~8 (ij..t::.!a ~.g'5=~ .l';1'-- as (I) ~gffi~d:illtO ~~sffi _-o.o..Ol(l)_ 80g~ guJ.!ao.oF~ -oCCEtU. .l';<(..t::(I') 0) . Ol ffi*~"C.cg ~<(~~~g~ 6>(jj15.2>~ 8 r;:i1ijro tUBt:: .w >'Cl~;:: -ga..0.~ 1a a.~~ ~a3'~~15 tU.5:?;2..t::-gffioO)E~6"=~ ~<a00..~-g:EN=.E.3=8$ .- >.0.. Ul:J as ~ (1)- ~ == m;S.c~~-OtU~~~ui<J) -o:J-g 0 :J~>'~ :J == - <J)..t:: o.....(I)o1ij.c(lJO~(I)-8.- .:=; C/).5 (I) t:: 05 -0"" t:: ..... 0) Cl 0) o-.Q :;:"U (I,) t:: :;: tU -g 1ii.2 gl'--~(I,) 22~'- g';aut:::J .O'~(I) = 'O'tU 5.~ BS .:::g-o ..... Q5 (I,) (I) ..... (I) 0..5 ..... 0""" (1).2:- o.ECl.= a.._ell(l) o.(I)goo .ra ..... ffi 6-.ra .ra m ..... .sa E '0'::= <J) Fg"fi ~ FF 3:,2 F~ 5.g:s '" . o - ... o N '" . '" ... '" . "' '" '" . o '" "'''' . 0 0_ ",,,, ... U> '" .l! s m '" l!! " " " " ;;: o " " .. N .. ;; U> c o .., .. ,,-' Ql 0 Ql ~ li'j'; s en n $.t- m .. ::; iii .~ 0 o <:6 .~ -g ~ ~.."'" a: E (U...... t::.g t:: 0 a.. 0 0 Qlo:2 ~.s ~ [~~ :B ro 8~ j o 3l (/) as._ Ul E N ~ (lJ 0) ~ ~~ 0) Q)..t:: I'-- 0: _, ,= (1).0 a. ~ ...... (ij~o jg~.E Q5 ~~-ao~~x ':.wc E ~ E.9~<oCCI'--~ ~~ ~ g o~ ~..t::.~::! 1ii!E.~ (I,) :J >. E~ ~.Et.t. ..C" ">"0 o g; 0 ~ tU .- 0 :- UJw-g~fEg?-.~ Zo .~llJ.oo~ :a:.....o:O.!!!"O~ffiOa) 0.0 c Ql8!. E"O Ea..a....N o.Q.O' E<( tU~E<( (lJ I'll"E69- c::;:::: 0 d:..5!! ell ~ 0'-' I'll" Ol as ~Ero2.....~ ~~~Ql-"Ot::S-ti o ..... Q) a> :J ~ 0"":; CG ell 0 S (\1 ~~~E E~~Ea..E~Ei3~~E ....OO<J) Ol'-'OO Q)eoo Ql(l,)OO <5 C/) 0 0 I- c: 0 0 .0 ~O 0 a.. ~ 0 0 " '" .. E g (1)$ 0" ~o: .0'0 ~ 0 "- .- ~8 3"" g ~ ,. ~ 000 ~2 ECi} c '" ~ c ~:g ,," -"- o r- '" . '" r- 0 0 '" - ''is 'N <b <b "'-" ~O 0,,- '" 0 .. ~ ~ ~ - ;j; ~ il 0, ro 'E 'ii5 o :J Q) Q) -;(I,)"O-S~ .-..t:: ~-o ~ .:::I-..5!! ffi~ ~--g~,:,::Ql .co (1,)5= -gCC~3:15 8.E~~:S 2 ~]i ~'"E ~O~ g-g F-g-g~c.: . ell f/l OlCO .::: Q) 0 Qle ~2~='d" ~~(I,)-g-" .::: <( = E '0 ;;;:;.9..05 5~ m ~ > 't: Ql ~~~8.~ t5~~~~ I'll" (I,) ."..t::_ ~~~~g' o Ol.w Q5.;:: ell~~~-5 15~~.$:?; t::a:.....~0a:i .~&a ~~8 Q)(\1~O-N ~E5~.9l?s ..t:: I'll" 3:.- -0 ~ ID~5~~;' -00 Cl3: E..o .2~~1ii.c"8 g.wm.2~"O .u:5::.2 2 ~ .~ is @ 2;:;:; (I,) 2 (1)_153: Ul o.OlS (1,)......;;; .ra= ~ ~8.ffi Fa8=~o. ... U> - ,*CO .,!< _U> - .. ::; .. Q)::i2..J~ > 0 Q) = Q).- Q 0 ;;;~(lJt- ~~ c .1i) E .. 0 Ill:!: .~~~ 'EEN .$:i21!'.i " '" Dc'" gs "0 I'll" Sell 00" c c c .. 0 0 (J)OO N - '?i:t::: ~ Ql :!::QlO......c 0.5 (l,)E ~ <J) Ql= III ell . =.....ot::..t::(I) 05-~<(t:: ---:';.~1ij!:Q~ ~.'!:!'w 0"0 I'll" N~~.9@~ ~..t:: '* ~==-;; >-.9R~~~ ~ ~~ ~ f3 5 .::~...... o.z ~ ~ ~'E CJj 5-g CC ~.g:O;'; (\1 .!!!.Ql~ @ E-g EllJ~==-~~ g~c~E~ 1ii6"=<<lC/)0:g O~-SUJ~as .,g Ql ~ z E ~ g=8uS5~ ~2 '~OO.$ ..o:!::~Q)UJ~ jg~..s-Sa..E Q):Jo-g-gE ..... (I)'; E 6> 0 .:=; lQ ~ E'(jj ~ t5::.c.gQ)..t:: (l,)c:-o(l)=~ 'O'S ~ Ul -0 (/) C.-~ffi~.~~ :Ea~E'~1a ~o.Eo~o '" . U> r- '" . "' r- c:2 o .!2l >-" .. '" " .. I o " '0' d: -' c. tii .0 .. ~ " 0: c " E * "- :! <:><: <C a.. t:ii w :I: C/) C/) C/) W 0:: Cl o 0:: D. ::c: 0:: o S: > <(...I ...I:I: ::::ll- OZ wO :E:E w, I-C/) u..1- 00 >w 1-'":1 -0 00:: D. C/) I- Z w :E w > o 0:: D. :E ,- :: .:.:.:.. ~ 9:~:::: .~.~... ::~~~f -:,>~:-~]/: ...~.~:t::: :::::~ :t::g:::.-. 8if: Ii ...I <( l- ii: <( o ~ t II>' . ill' U ~ t o Z '" r-- m "5 o c: '* c: ooQ -0; "00 nj:;::: 0:;::; c: ~ .s~ m l5 ~"O g"E ..... ~8 .....~ .....~ ..........~ )i~> .:...:.g:.. '#.E ~ >.0 e o.-=: 0>..... 0:0.- Q) Q) N Q) ~ !if.!: ~=::I..::.:1- c>-.9~~~ OCQ;I=Q.(tl ~ Q) OJ ~Cf.I::: .0I~.m E~ ro .!:: 1ii !ij~"OO "U..c Co::l Q) E c"'C l:: ~ c: 0 <<l ~.Ql 0 .Ql~ ~c: 1;30 ci<e "5..'-"'0 ..cS2 ~**ffi;o?j (J)Q)O=Q)_ "O..c(O::I>~ !ij g (l) ~.~_ _"_..c 0 Q) en os:=;O....LLJ 2Cl2~~Z<li ii.i s::.~..... 0 (l) @ 6~~.9(l)=1a O(l):Ju~ao "OC:(f.Ict;l ..... c.!!l'"E..c ~11.9 ~~:m.fl~ffi-g OlE:Ja5t::EC .~ as ~ E!g E .a ~.~8~:28~ =!!!G>oE"O"O 3:: O)..c Q) >. Q) C '0 c I-..c..c.~ <tl .!!2.t5 11..... .?;- e-g e'5<'E~5~~ Q.ll>='-Q)UlQ) "0 Ql >. ctl..c <<l-u Q)=~~.......c"O "g00 o.9.?;-ctl .a;~~~C3~ >'c 11>,- ell l!) Q) lll<l>ii)O..::.:..c3:: "-ElU;:ia}t-:11 ~8~.~a.~ffi -;@:E~.~~E ._..c"O Ul (ij E F:ffi@,g~o8 '" . Ie .. on r-- c:E 0.E' >~ ~~ " :2 .b o 11: ~ 1ij 00 ~ 00 ~Q) o t:i E.o ci> ~ :~ g'~~ ~ C\i.s" CI'l :B ~ -SSE '5 ~ gj '~a"C ~ ~'og -g~,g 8 a. c a. E III g c.~ .~a(lj ~~~ Of'-.(tI =Q~ .... (,) tJ g ~ o.2=-..::.: g? ~:E .2>~.2 ~o ~ ~~ 5- ~~ ~ gS<D 1ij_.~ ~E ~ ar-01ti OC;-.E ~~.~ ~~:e Bc.8 -o~o. UJ c.s 1ti~~ c u a 0 ::=...... Ui ('ll"'C 5 :.s g.;;: .- Q) '5 $:-Q) Q) ~o E<flc ..Q-g~'@ ~'l::o-o .J:)('ll.- "5 ell a.Q ,.. ~B: ~ -;~ o..ai ai 8::;::: ..... ('ll"'ffi<(-Od ~ ~o <fl.E.~ <fl $: I - 0 ~ <fl C <fl <fl ';;;c>>,g~3:8::.~o <flCc ~.s;;:('ll.-=:',..<(SE .Q.Q ('ll - ~ E ~ ('ll 1i3 li.:E ,a.ffi =51~~== ..cOell ~~.~~~jg.E ~ m~':-: ~-.S:i::o..mcOc8 ~li~ oj,g.~t:o'**' <DQ)._ 3: l{') <D:o:2 I E Q) 0.. 0 ij) cO) a:,g.s J1 Q) -.E ~ 5 :: .2l 01 Ci <fl >'i;; E..c -0 u 0 m"S-LU.E.!:J-g~ cC')- "0 l'a 5 ' ~ _ Q) 3: ('ll 0)0 aig.;;~l'aoEg> ::.g!!! ~6:M:s: c...~~:a5E ~~.8 ~ 1~'O:$~<flQ)EQ)a~ai CUJ .....un:l.~E"OBQ)..... 8(i3 ~~&~~~ c: g.!!la5 ~ll.~a: I'tlO:J- ~o~~ O^AA'OAA3:<CAOa.. '" . ~ '" ~~ ~S - ~ ~Eca:a 'O~....= 0.-.... <e c=~:D -;;: ~ E '$ a:1<e " m ~ ~ ~ll. > 00 ~ OE "'ffi g ~~ :~ 8- * ~ Ci c: ~ a.. 0 -g 5l 2.s :g~~~ ~ ~. E Q) U,.. co 0 as Q)..... _01 zm~~ coN;;;'? ~ffi ~...~"'~!:;:: ~0""'J'-. $:..c ,-...... :s: t: 0 ~e wg~:: ...tll.5S ~~ :S{:/HR.~ ~li3 ~': >'-0 ~,..~co 2-gE.E Jgffi -.;ddd z~Q)ai ~ c>>w@zzz u]5 -5.r!;! ..c .S ~ s"ri "ri "ri .. a5 ~ ffi ~oo. g~CI)<flffiffiffi~EIDE~ ~Ee:.13EEEo<(""<(0.. u..o,..O<C<(<(ZA~Ag. ~ ~ " o ~ jij "' "E .c ~ 00 15 m ~ 00 15 .l'! "0 ~ '" ~ o ~ 'ffi o ~ 00 E m E -g:o ~tl~ om m oo~'" ~ ~'E 1ij13~ o'@~ ""'E~ a5SB E ~ m"- ~~ 55 <(.Q E g-:g ~ Orn'" U "," 5"E B U ~ffi ~ m ~ i5 a.. * li3 g.!!l.ffi ..co~~ 5 ^ B ^ ~ "0 . ~ .0:;;;;; ell ~C:..cC 5~-:; ~ ~ 55.!: a ~.~~ -g:~~ ~s ~"-- ~E ~~ ~.~ a.s _ 00 . ..c ('ll ('ll..... ~ c Q) ~ _ E.!:::;:::: ~~~ 55 C} ff e O-On:l('ll ~5l.8-~ ~g.o5d ~ a..u.. Q) u.. .8Q)~Fa? -o-.E- .0 "5oe~- .!:;;; ~.~ 55 ~ ~ 0 c: ~ .(ij <fl"O [a. ('l108c>>c E.8iI:3:~ >,.!!l >, ~ ell OlQ)EQ)$: ell;:::: ~..c..... t5<flo.....eo' 2~~.E; tlo:s!.og 6.!:?~.2:;:;; ~a.~ c; g- '~-g~E.~ 0: ('ll.-=:, c:l m .~g!.,$:-g"O Eo g> n:l (ti ~1Il:i2_<flli3 .- Q) 0 >, > FF3:S51 ~ ~ .8 ~ ~e 0'" o - ~ ~ ~ o :; iii o o 000 ~~ =J'-. E~o ~eC') .(ij<(~ ~o E E -' ~ ~;;: 0 " E ~~<( 3:!S!0: ~~~ "O~~ _00 QUU = 'C r--", Ou h m 1i ~ ~ ~ "'C .!!l- 3: ~~:E~ o!!:! 3: a.. ~0.."'8('ll >'c:ca"S ~ .~"s ~ ~~~~ ~*81-- !!:!gQ)~ ~ _.0 .... 00=_ ~"@.~ ~ Q):;:: c c: I--'E ~.5 ~.c 0 ~~s~ .Q :>. ~ I-- -0 rn 0- ~ $:o~ '5~tcia: ..co..g<ti fijas(\l~ ell Ol>,O .s ffi l'a ~ ~g~~ ffio....!!5l'a -a-a... S;;;~ ~ .E Ec Q)-Oeo' :s!EE1},..: e,g~1fd; c.. .......0 :-~g>~s: ~ 5.;:: Ba... ~ CI).g a.. d 'e~-g g>:= ~~~.~.~ ~~~.2d: '" . o '" .. o '" .. J2..J C U ~ ll> ~ -;: C l: ~ > Cll 0 tiS:fi ~i- lD rn :; E ,g 00 ~ ~ .!E '" o ~on "5 S.8 "'il' r-- 3 ~"" 5 l'a c:o. 2i~ E ffi (f)~ d, ~ c:o. '" o ~ o 11: '" ;; E ~,g"'8 g <fl~ (\Itu"@ 00 ~ 0000- l'a 0....... m 0 00 ~~o Q)~E ~"'8~ o>t- E .8~ m ~ rn i;;;&. ",<<JOCO ~~o c >. 0..0 Q).-=: Q)(\I EO-.E ~ ~ ~ g> ~ ~.~.~ ffi ('llQ)Q)"" :2 ::.5;'0 EO...."O ~$'Oa5 ~~~~ n:l"'3 B..... a.. <fl 0(1) .1Il g a..~ ~~~ 3: O'(ij -.2 :5 .8'~ ~ -0'- 1:5 fJ Q)~ ell R~~~ ~;: . <D ~oo.c '~.E E:= ..... m;;:::: 3: ~ 3: g>c .0'0..'- I'tl ....LL== ~o: ~ ~ :i::C55 I--<Cu(.) ~ :11. . '" s:::C o .~ >~ .. '" " .. :>: 00 o o '" m 0; "0 0. ::0 E m "@. (f) E ~ E m fl' ~ rn :2 ~ m E ~'" >~ rno a.'" ~ ~ D. .!!! Co ;;: ~ ~ .f m 0. ~ 00 1ii:: _t- ~"ri ~ m 00-55 Efj e- ll. ~ '8 . "0 ffi c '" m c ..c '0.. "50. o rn 00 E ~"O -.E ffi <.. !Xl lil :c: S! Ifi Q ~ 2: .LIJ !Xl I!? ~ ~ l'J ~ m E ~ B- E ~ 'm Ci E " u; "0 .~ "@ o o -' " '" o ol- o 11: <Xl o '" o ;; (/) D. S ....................... 0 CO .... 0 0 LL '" 0 '" .......... ..... .... ... - .... W 0 0 <( ll.. / I- W W J: en en en w a: Cl o a: 11. ~ a: o == > <(....I ....IJ: ::II- 0% wO ::!:::!: w, I-en L1.1- 00 >w 1:::3 Oa: 11. en I- % W ::!: w > o a: 11. ~ ....I <( l- e: <( o ..fil... 1.<................ ~.Ii .:.:-~:-~:!/: ;!j-'l:c /;Ir }i1:1 'i;:l0l' ~I ni! >~::~::~:<-: :8 II" ~ e g, e '" o Cl e ... .... 0 -' i <<~ <~Q :.:.:.:o.:O!::.:. .......ll:........ ...... ~ <c E-.!1?S"@'5:1am EO 8.l'~~~-gJJ.s.~<Xl ~.~ ......l::QlU6>."Eco .s'U ~.2roQ)-Cii8.2t:: ~ .Q)o"" ~ ~ $ ~-g.s (.) ~,... c:.. Cl~.!:!!.5 mE. co ,2c.. :g~EQ)~~~5~ <C. .0'0'.8 = ">.a... 0- $ :2 -g ~ a. 'fij tl ~ . E -g 3: we ;pn()2:J=xCl:SQ) LL CIl -a Q) 0..... CIl c: Q) O)..c g> ID Q) -g-fi ~ ~E c:.~:: ::28 .a.2ffi8~ ~~.E Q) <<I g ~c: .s 'E ~ ~ 5 as ~Q) C\I16"U"O_l:::2(1)'S Ul= x~C:Q)l!?Q)~E"g ';' OJ o"U n:l as a.;; 3: ......r:: [3'Z a..!Z'Ql C C CIl.2 <) u fa-<<IC3='~;Sffi~~ 0)2 c'~~8..Q'~~o5 ~ ~ 'ti ~ ~ ~ ffi.9 ~o""'.!:2 ~819 01- Q) c.,~,(f.j o"E= OQ)=Bu:i~~u).g;ffi-c U ..... C'll:;;:;; '.... "- Q) Q) 0.. 0 ~{3~ g:=}J~]! ~~ ~3: g~.!!!-m~g6g:g.5'E.s Q)'_ C c: (lj:::::S: 1I)..c :J W OJ ffi~.~8~f:go~.s~o~ U)..c';CD..c'OOCQlUl..Q""!"lE c~c-:E05c152o"5E .2_.- ""'o<<lZ.s!-'- mc:EIDmu'O ~.!:2a:o; ~;S~-gc:..... E._EC1;I~ 'a'~io.::s:.cg$CIl......S<h ~"O"'C.5 $ ~'€'S <<I.E~ <',;:::::; >..0 ~ c"o:: en t a... ~ '1i) li1 "C:S:.::t:. !!:! ~. c :c Q) w g Q) > .a 0 6 a. '(i5 ~ I- C) Z ctl .0 .c (/) 0: So: ~ ;/I. o ;/I. o - ~~ 00 ~ =~ o > u ~ UI'" J: " ~ m m N_ ..!!. 13 5 u Z 0 ~ E c 'E< ,!:!! rot) 1;;.::t:.'Sro Q)Q)en~ -g~aa a... 000 ... o ..I- o ~ ~ ~ ,;, o ~ .~ w ~ 1il Iii '"' o o '" " ~ t:: -"S 8.. :m--:l ~ 'E -g ~ ..c ~ 0 -g ~ l:i ~ : ~ g- ~ ~ 1ij ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ;: "'ii3 -5 a Q) (;) .~ ~ -g ,'~ ~ Q).:i ~ r-- en (;) <- (;) .3 C\l '0 0 ~ g.~ 6 ~ Q) ~ m g!'Oo.8 ~%!~ ,z~ .o~ E ,Q1o"C~ '-E"o."'oo~", 16,., o en d) _ "C Q)..... > C Q) 6-g6i2 (j)>-(I)~:2:2<<ie~ OJ ..... > >- ,-e: 1D~ 1:1 a.. 1:1 0 o."'ii3 6> ce8:EcD.oCQl~-gQlO~:l=: 'iij g 8:<(.g g <c::::> ~ 0> e ~ ' 'E ~ ~~~~~~a~~K,,8:~~~ '8 eenovQlu..c<Co~ -eE..... C 'UaalCJ),'~.:...a.,;"~a$! Q) .Ea(])lS-gt~ffi~'E-eeol E I (]) ~ a. ~ 8...0 E I Ql.3 8:.0 ~ g. t~w~>-Ql"'ii3encEoo<("'ii3'E ~ 8.w 6> ctl 8::0: ~ li1g l':lrq , "E 0 (]) ~5'iijro<(l':ll:il':l~~ffili1~'E "0 '(i5(]).o;"~a.<("'ii3{/JE'6cO -g 'OQ)o>--eo<(>.><(c~oo ::l .~.o~.$.3<(,21:1W~eW'5'= c it.i e >'.8 ctlCJ)1:I'::'.3 0='5_ c<( E~a..CictlS:o.!!!CUOOt5~c~W<( oo....en"OE;;::~E"'ii3::l0LlJ::l.....3: o"6~~ ffi.9~-g l5E 8,=ro-s~:c '~;O<(~OOI-:20.E<(<(Z()Du.. o ctl ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ '" . '" '" - *~ ~S - I ~ I::~ ~.! <C > > - <C~E " I 16 w ~ e ~ ~ 000 0 oo.~ oOC!:C!:OO-e :t g~~re~'iii a:J v~l"-:v 0 a. Clgg(Y) "'" ~~a.Oll eM ::g~ "..",,'~ en .....C\I(Y)"<tv~ ~ 6 oo~~-go .~~o ........ZZ . . ctlZ 5e:..~gci:5:555~~ oo>-a:oz~~<(<(ZE 0'> 8...;....: E C.::t:..::t:. t t..... <( 1'--0) c<(O)>-..... 00""" O:O:S,oE~~:s::s::s:'O ~"Q~,g-gctlctl~~~.~ l.O'O'cccu>-'-xx$t '7a:88~;nS~~~ 8. <:l ~ CI) <:l ~ ~ q: ~ llJ ;J:: ~ :5: e! fd a If " Cl e m .c ~ j'l E ~ '" ~ ~ '" 0) co Q) co o (f) 0- ;: 0 ex> Hi ~ 0 >> 0 u.. ~ 0 0 ~ ex> - ~ I>>: ::><: w 0 CJ <C D.. I- W W J: en en en w 0:: e" o 0:: a. ~ 0:: o 3= > <(...I ...IJ: ::::ll- OZ wO :i::i: w. I-en u..1- 00 >w 1::6 00:: a. en I- Z w :i: w > o 0:: a. ~ ...I <( l- e: <( o :~::g:::: ~- :::~.~.~.... "-:~::.'. :~::t:~::} as.. " ;~[: ..ii .~ 00 ~ 1ii /]j 00 0. o U ~ ~ f- ,,; c ~ I. 1ii o ~ '0 '" 'E '" '0 C o ~ ~ ~ w'" o"S: :>. 'c ~ ~ ~ " Cl "'~ i ::''Fu 000'" -cc ID~ ~ 5-<3 ~~ ~~t~ !!l5::l':i c , ~ :::;)(I)i::' oE.!2 ",a. c<(_ .Q >. E romC>> ffi:;:::2: ffi~ ~~ 5~~~ '" Ili;1 IUmmmH i. >:-:-:~<~:-:. (I) E "'6 ~ ~ C\i toG co ~ l;; g a... g ~::::~ c.. -;;; ~ :::::::~>~:::::: :s Q} ~ ~ C\J C\J Jj ..... ..... ~ ~:E H~~) If i ; I! i~ !j~iH~~~~~~~HBLH gm~CI)$~ffiooooo~ffi~ffiffiffiIDE~ ~e~a~EEOOQOOEEEEEEo~~ ............~o oc<<ooooO<<<<<<ZAll.. .....~ ..........~ Ig<: :"': 55 '0 g g ~ g 0 8: o ~ Cll ~ Q). ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ w ;: g 2">1e E .~ .~ ~u L ~ ~ w O.....s:::O~ ..,_~ -g ~5~ ~r-.. g .~g(ijQ) ~ ~~g eC\Jtas~~eo'2~ o .00_""E- 1ij....8..:!::<<l(l)-.Q)g fit ro O~l:?~:!::e;~-g a: ~~8.g Q5e<<i-g~o.-g~~ t5 ~'6@~ a. c>-oo..> ro Ql Q) i::-o ro 08::.: 0 <ll <( 0 ~E "e- cj!tcC C<(o>l:5_~'5..cro a... ..=! _=>li: '1i.j I c<(a.l5..{)'<(Q.'3:O Q) J.... .~ c'tij 0..= Cll ffi S i~E~ a:~fr~<(,~~~a. >ea>o "'~ '" '5 E Cll E z ~ 0 a... 5 (/) ~ ~(ij.5 E 8:@-5- "w 0 I a5';::'~ 6:.!!! Q) <(0..0.... ~~158li*e5..0.~ E O&. t:ec.xQ)::?:Cl<cCC g. -e~caQ) <CI-~W~ 1130' ~ 8..u:: 1:: a:: t/l 5.. c: W ~ >";:: ~ Q) Q) mg 56$.9IC<<leQ5::::l ~ OC-eE= ~~~~~a::REO/]j ~ o8.5~ ij)Bij)OQ)B<Cmo;: ~ .~m05 C C.c_ ~O c.2" f! .;:Uje~C:5 Oo~B~Q-a5"OO 1::;:0.. o~O !6.2aE~ ~aE m E ~~~.~~ ~~~ ~B~~ ~ g 5;B =~Oa..CZcI-WOO~<CWGa::OO C)<<l^^^^<C^^^^^^^^^ 0, c ." c '" :E c o n 2 1;; c o u ~ N '@ C ~ i;; 0. o l o 2 :E ~ '0 "0 ~ c o c '" m .0 00 '" ~ ~ 6 ~ " '" I ~ ~ . ... ... - I - - (;!i!:~ '" ... ..- .,'" . Q ~ - - ~ .~ E cu ~ ~CQ""= 0'- .... <C c=B:; -;:~E ~..... <C ~ ~ 0\ Q ~ o u. o ~ '" iil .9- 6 :~ ~ ~ ~ ~...... ~ ~ a :: il ~ ~ ;:: lal ~ - I ,. I ~ 1'1. I I ,~ ~ '" li ~ E .. Ii I ~ c:~ ~ ~ . 'i~~ ~u", 0..00 E05.9: 81::'(; B~f! ~ c.'" Cii.Q~ a.. ~ I: ~~~ ~E:g c S :::s o E '" :;:; E C 00 0 0 ~C)~ :I:~o E ~~ JJ~~ rn;~ -goug 50!!!, as ~ 0 ~ ~a.ffi !~~ ~~1@ --~ ~.~g o..-goe ~ ~ C. ~l?~ -I- ::: g<li.E 'o"E OJ a.~ 05 .~ ffi-g F~~ e. ~ 1::2 0.21 >~ '" '" " '" :I: I '0 C ~ e ~ ~ ~ :? i c '" E ~ C o :;:;c 00 '" ~~ :I: ~ EO. '" m "'0: = ~ '" . Q "' - ,J, Q f " 00 CoC ;S '" ~ 0 m"C-o 0)0) 1= 5 ~ .: .: Q) Ooa; "1:1 "1:1 .cool:l: ~-~.aa! :gft~gdul tI:l II: Q) m T"" ~ "'c~c:::s~o .c<c~ .....2 c . <<l _ al Q. <<lC:(/)CQ_ o08.<<lQU) t/l 1a 0 -S N 0) Q)........ 1Il...."CI ffi ~a.. C m..6 - 0 .8>- m ~~r--. <<1- 0 ~;:~"O~~ ::::l$.-$JlO:) <<I.;: C\j g U. Q :!::Q)o"'ij)=~ m.J:: c: t/l c> 05 -; 0"C ::::l U. E>$ffi"Cm 2K:2~?t.:5 ~ E m ~ ~ 0) .- 3: 0 m C ,g 0 III C. "C .;: ~ ~ ~ K~-6 ...... ::::l 0 .- C ~~l?~~'(ij c: ~""";Jl ~ 81- 5 ~ '0 "CI E 05 -g o~.!' ~ =iD.c:m2Q1 '~::!:~;;'Q.'t >'C::l = Ill.... -g 0 a..O:E QI ......(/)t/lQ)-.c ;~~Fi= :6 ~~r--:.~! .- '- ::l 0.... 0 lQot)<D1ijQ) 2-gQl~152 <C<<I-Eooo.. ~ '" . Q ~ ~ "tn= ~ ",.. '" '" ~ ....tme .. '" "5 u '" E ~ .< "' C o 00 m C '" -' ~ :m .x ~ <( ... - ,J, Q f 00 u .. 00 '" &i~ ..00 ~ 0 .015 :; ~ ~ m B<<Ig ~ma. .5 ~ ~ 3:: 0- 0(6 ~~a. "'~ iij- "'''''0 .5.5 ill E E.~ ~ 2o-g a.~0Q; -g.efli ~ liS-:=~ K~ ~ lQ~ .e =d:~ g~5 :E ~ '~ e 00 OJ ~cii~ C m m <<15 E ~= ij) c'~ ..c ~~g ~o'" 153: a. .c.e~ ~ 00 '" ~~6 _c- "'-ijl E g Q) '" u C fli.8 0_ :I:W~ .. Z ~ E 0 '0 0 '" :c " 0 '0 C ~ '" '" C ." frl 00 0 " ~ i;;- >0: o eo. "' " 0 0. ",m Iii ",0: ~ti ~ '" ~ ~'e '<l: ~a. .,J '" oS ~ ;; '" > C '" ~ ~ u 2 >- C '" '" ~ ,l: c ~ - '" .... e '" ~ e ~ 0 ~ (f) ~ a. $: '" Q<Xl ~Q Q ~ Q ~ - ~ Q u.. o '" w Cl <( ll. o I- W W J: en en en w 0: Cl o 0: 0- ~ 0: o 3: > <(...I ...IJ: :;:)1- OZ wO ==== w, I-en u..1- 00 >w 1::6 00: 0- en I- Z W == W > o 0: 0- ~ ...I <( l- e: <( o !<.... f i...C....... \) ( :~)ir:::' ~...... ....~.~.~..... !Il :~<j~:j;)/ ]1< 1111 ....~.O... ... .,.. ,..:,:1;:<';>; if! .....~ ..........~ jif< >:-:-:~-: ,<...:. .,;Jl ~ 0';:: n:l n:l . ~ :g~.~ ~ ~"$ ~~~ 1ij -g'~ 'R~ 5 """ 16;0": e.9 ~ @ lS:"? @:: III =>"""'J 0 '0 ~ ~ m 5~ a;?: 8~.9~ ".Q)(f) Q) ~ E:J ~ t: ~ -= 0- ~ g>";:: g> Q) ..... 'c -s-g !BOffi 'O.~ ~ ~ III (1)=.... a g'm ~ '5:=,,0 ..a~g!5 camet: .~ c.. 0 :S ~ 1tu ":::; '-_ t'I:l aJ ID'~ 5 ..cl::5~ ~"Q; 0 c - ffi Q) ~ c Cf.I Ol-c Q) CD Cll t: Et.88 ~ 8.00 !? 1i3e>~ en a.CI:;;::; _ 0 2"8 m .- 0= (J ! :. a. m Cl c ro = u <D a. ~ ~ ~ ~ '" C <D E <D ~ Cl '" <D " (fJ " c ro <D ~ ~ ~ o a. .~ c o ; '0 o 0. ~ Z, 6 ~ B <D " .0 ~ > ir "0 ci o <D " " '. Cl C '" ~ iii c o c o .0 ~ <D (fJ 16 ~ 6 ~ e 0. 0. ro o o o .0 '" N ., @J " ffi IS 1ijU)'@ E8.2 ffi~ 0) t:: ~.!:: ~~' ~ I:: "ffi ~ :g.2 : ~ <D ~ (.):g Q) m i; ":; ~ " ~ "E';~ ~ o;::.~ <D ro ro ~~ 8: (fJa.", " <D ., " .2 Cl c :ll <D :. ~ .~ ~ " ~ ... a 0. '" ~ " "' .". ~ a :0- .~ <D o " " ~ "e 0. 0. ro S 03 ~ <D .;::~ z-g. 66.. 1iSfa" =-g " <D .~ ~ >- -g .~ ~g ~ 6 0>0 ~" Co g.~ ~ca 0" C ro oE _~,'g_ 8 ~ >; () ..c:t:: j .~ 8- (I) 0: a. G) .l:; Q) e 6 -g ~ o 0. ~ -g~ ~ &:00 '* ~ g. .s _~ 1il 5 Q) Q) u" " 9ffi.s~ 0)- C OJ .~ ~ E ~ .......s :::l "S: 5 lif g e 0....-0 a. C o ~ ~ ... a :0- ~ .~ C o .0 ~ <D ~ Cl o ." o ~ 1il I 008'0-80-8008'008 ~ 0 ... 0 .... 0 .... 0 .... 0 m .- n:l'- Ill'- III .- III .- oc3Oc3Uoofioej " u. o ~ Cl o ro .9- ;; c: " ro o c: <D Cl ro Iii " 03 'to <D " o '" o <D E C .Q> " <D c: N ro is s a Q '" U ~ '" ~ ~ "' <D C '" o i3 E Cl :s I :. a. ro Cl C ro ~ u <D a. ~ ~ '" Q is '" 'S o '" o o ~ Cl ; I f ~ :. a. ro Cl o ro ~ l;l a. ~ ~ ~ ~ is '" '0-8 ~ 0 ro- (J~ (J -o8-.g-08-o8 e 0 e 0 E 0 E 0 ~:s~:c~:c~:c () (J 0 (J 0' <D E o Cl 1ii <D a: 1il o c: ~ is c ~ " <;5 ~ 03 ~ ro a. e 0' o o " o o u: >, 0' ~ o o <D " .~ ~ ir " o ro ~ ~ o e- ~ (fJ .~ a. o o B :. ~ " (fJ o o ~ " C ro " ;;: o c: " . Cl .~ 0; <D E 0. ~ 0; ~ .E " ~ :;;; "0 u ~ ro 16 ~ ~ <D .0 '. E ~ a. C:- O' UJ B 0' ~ <D 6 E -w en '$ oS 85 ~ .2 m (1);:;:<( ~8~ ~_(fJ Cl 5 Cl :S:..::.: _5 03=5 a:~UJ ~ 0' <D o U ." 6 <D Cl " di -0 <D a. ~ '0 o " <D CJ ro 0' ro (fJ ~ ~ ~ '" -~ "0 0. ~ 0' <D E ~ ~ <D ~ ~ '" 2 U5 ~ >, .9 ;f ~ >, .0 ~ '3 0- ~ '5 o " @ ~ C o ~ 8 03 a: "0 ~ " o o Cl C '" ~ '" ~ ~ 16 <.> e 0. ~ o ~ 1il o "0 ~ <D 's> 1! '" z Cl c '0 Cl ~ o ~ E jg " 1'J 03 a: ~ $: "0 E Cl ir ~ ~ o <D C '" 03 u ~ ::E . ~ (,) ~ o If !g @ :c= oq: .... uj (,) !Q ::i!: ~ oq: .... ~ (,) ~ l/) ci ti <D ~ 0- <D c: 53 E <D ~ il E ''; a: " o ro ~ Cl ro ~ u ro 0.. " iD Cl o '0 ~ <D U o Ii: " '" ~ ~ ro li! ~ <D E '" " u. o ~ u o ro a: ~ Cl @ 0. -~ a: '" Q '" Q ~ ci 0; 0. E o u ~ ro ~ <D Cl ro ~ u ro 0. " :J3 <( ci ti <D o 0- <D a: 0' <D E <D ~ o .0 E .'; a: Cl o .0 ~ <D <.> e a. " '" ~ "" z ~ li! ~ E '" " u. o C o ti ~ m I '" Q ~ Q Q tJ ci 0; 0. E o u <.> :. ~ <D Cl ro ~ 2 0. " :J3 <( ci ti <D ~ g a: 0' <D E <D ~ o .0 E ''; c: Cl o '0 ~ e a. "- . '" "' '" Z ~ ro li! ~ <D E '" Q u. o C ~ > :. I ~ ~ Q '" U ci 0; 0. E o U <D :. ~ <D lil' '" 2 0. " :J3 <( ci ti <D ~ 0- <D a: 0' <D E <D ~ il E ''; a: Cl c .0 ~ <D U o Ii: "- . '" ~ ~ ro li! ~ <D E '" " u. o 'i: C ~ o ~ Q ~ Q Q tJ ci 0; 0. E o u 1! ro ~ <D Cl ro ~ u ro 0. "0 :J3 <( 2i ~ <D o 0- <D a: C <D E <D ~ o .0 E .'; c: Cl o .0 ~ <D U e a. " '" <'l "" Z ii ;;; ~ E '" " u. o ~ ~ o "0 ;;: '" Q :;: Q '" U ci 0; 0. E o U <D m ~ <D Cl ro ~ 2 0. " :J3 <( ci ti <D ~ g a: 0' <D E <D ~ o .0 E ''; c: Cl o '0 ~ e a. " '" '" Z ~ ro li! ~ .. E '" " u. o J!! 'i: ro o <D ~ ' '" a Q '" U ci 1ii -e- a. ~ ~ o .~ > ~~ ~g 1115 C u <D Cl E 0 -g-(i) <D ~ Ell ro ~ .0. " 0 u .- ro_ ~1a gt) u 0 0"0; .~ g ~ ro 0._ ~ Q:'(i) o~ ro . ,g g> ~ .- <D ~~'e- _!:: e Co g~ .~ .... ~.!!? ~-E~ ClOa. :~ ~o I;llC= ~ ro ro ;J::.... c02 ro O/S ~ ~ ~ ~ <D 0 <D '5.2 "E ~rs~ .-;:: (I) o 0 ro g-S"fi ro ~ ~ ~ ro 0 ~..::.: a. <D~" a:~@ ~ ~ '" c '0 Cl ~ o Cl C '0 '" ~ o ~ ~ ro C .J!! "3 ~ ~ .. = .. " 2 '5 ~ " o ro " ~ " <D U. Cl o '0 ~ ~!1 o C o.~ "0 <D 0 @ f:2 0 ciiB ~ ~ .s _!!? ro <D C a. a: .- <D ~ E ~-g ~ Cl~- ~~~ ~ E 6 >-(fJ0 ~ 0 ~ = .g .E ~ ~ '" '" '" '" o (/J a. $: COO ~C C U-N 00 ~ C- ~;; W Cl <{ a. I- W W J: en en en w IX C) o IX c.. :=.:: IX o 3: >- <(...I ...IJ: ::II- (,)Z wO :::: w, I-en lJ..1- 0(,) >-W 1::(3 (,)IX c.. en I- Z W :: w > o IX c.. :: ...I <( l- e: <( (,) ......... .... ..... ...................... .................< ...~.:..~........... <::~~+i::l ....."'.;,,:.. >8t 01";:-... ]I~ Ii /~N ....~.~. s~< ~% >n {Iii .1 "E ~ ...... ::; .....~ ........:.Ol ..<a ...:-.....'" if :::::::g::: .......... m 1< R a. ::::l ci 6~O (Y) (J....- (j) -~ .0 ~"E ~ .g Q)....= ...., ~~Z3 ~ .8 55.2 ~ g~.E ~ ~1ij5 @ . e u. Q) s::: U l:: -a or:::.2 ctl i3wal E .5 ~~ ~ ~:ffi ~ c 8;::- e .... <( u .~ .E '0 ~ r-..: Q) ~ E~!;2.E >o~o_ eo a..!;'2;:; 0.-0 .0)"':; ~g ~ -g ffi mu:::~-gz ~~LO~-g (/)::::l: 2 ctl j'gOUl(ijw _ ()~:::l 0 C Q) :::I c- _ ,2:g <( Q) (J) .~ ~ g>~ ~ o.;::"i:;.E -g ..t:: a: Q) (/J > "5 oS 8".a e <(':lEu$!! 8: 0..... 00 C/j ctl _c UU t5 ~ ci.~ ~ Q) Q) (.) 0._ . g-~~Ci~~ 0: lij>a: 6 ~ 2a ~ ~ ~ m :> .. C .~ '5 .., ... '" m ~ o EO ~ a. .... ~ c 11: ~ ~ ~ m :> .. C .~ '5 .., c m 0 o ~ (LC ~ ~ t;~~:g .......sc:[[) E:5oddl ctlm_Q) g-m a5li5 a: cr: ~.s 5~!ij~ $~&- .....>0:_ g.~ ~~ CU"'Olll ~ ~d56 f-a: >. Q) <<l ctl E Me ~ ~ '5 'E ,Q>2 OOll..ID... c ~ . '" ~ .E 0> C ... ~ e 0. ]! C m E c e 'S; c m m ,s .E 0> C o ;;: c o Eo U5g -go ..s: ~M OW ffi~ m c ~.2 1;; a: .0 a: um g!:C 21ii g:~ co m m E '0' ~a. 5.5::2 ",,s 0> c 1ij'g.!::2 1ijC:::l;Soo c~U)oC\l Q)'OC\l_a: E-ooc-ooo a~(I)~.s .~~~~.~ lJ.lelij1ti:g .eg-m~-g 2;13.2"::; ffi"*$~-c E .- C ro Q) :::l 8 Q) CIl "5 o U) E"'C c- . .g:eas~g> _ II) '5 -; Q)'O ~:::::l::1ti.o5 Ci)~ ~ (jj'~:: W-c.EOU'lC\l ~ffi-g~31f8 ffi~-g~~~ _0 Q) It) 0'- ~~ ~ga.g ~~~a~~ i:Sffig'Olii~ (jj~~c~w -~.o -00 5: e-g f3 -g m ~'E; ~ CL@-gcuCU3: g>~ell:5g:~ -~ a. ~.5: ~ ffi a.. c'> "C .0 ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ cu a..~m a; E @ 0(1)..... 3: ~ J:: CIlo>liictlQ)Q) m<EI::.fi3: u~5ffitfg> 5..!!l.s ~.Ql.'6 c: ~ Iii~ 5..a '" z ~ ~ z ~ II :> .. C .~ '5 .., ~ m :> m C .!1 "5 .., ~ '6 :> 1" m E'" ~.s 8'C o:c?J- - Co 8 86iS is (1)(1) UJ O>~ .9:g~ ~m g$~ ~ 0 ~ 0>' .. o:.Q g. Q)~J:: ~,~~ cht5~ ~~ffi ~ m ~ UJa.a on .. '" .. 11: ~ ~ ,;, c 11: ~ i:l ~ c c ~ ~~ .g, -g'm.s ~,~ ctl<<:~ -1ij "C .- 00 Q) 'N a5 I:: CiS 0 c: ~~ a.....J ~ a. 0 ~E1ij oE~ c...oo > c:.: >. 00 ffiCll.o 00: .Dc 3: (1)1:: ~~.~ m8. ,g E ~ e ~ u; 8 (is ~~ :g -g,~ .- E Q) ,<=: '6 ~.g B ~ -g , ~ ~ <<: a: 0 g :::1.0 fQ",:_o~o > "C ~ ':S: -g'~:m ~ ('(l Q) ('(l ~ 'E..-- -g ~ ~ca.ow('(l'5 -C~CIl(G('(l (I) (1) c > a. l1J E -g (1) e <<: Z I:: m.5 8::~ -g.g ~ ~ ~ "C ('(lE:~'5'.s2 (I) Q) 0 <<l I:: Q) E....a..oQ)o.. .... Em ,5: E E .E (I) ... "C 5 0 ~~~5'50 .- _ Q) LL. I:: a5 ~ (G 0..l1J Q) m a: 0 EI- "C (I) ~;8~.~~ u:: ~ ~ -g ~ c... ~ 'E~'E ~ @' f3.g -g ~ @1: CLCIl('(l('(l:I:O ,,; 1;; m ~ ~ E m E m l!? ~ .0 E .~ u. ::; => f- .E ~ .'l '6 c m ~ m "0 ~ m '$ ~ >. ~ .. ~ o ... z ~ II :> m C .!1 '5 .., u:- ::; => !::. m m u. c o ~ g ~ E .E .c => c o rJ " 8. ~ c m '" 5 u .~ 5 a ,s 5 _z Cm m.... E" ~'5 C 0 ..a: '22 W('(lti c:Ci5.~ ~~e ~~~ 8.~.Q (l)Q)1ij tij i,Q ~iS:S , C m j:!~~ o :> .g .. > ~ '" z ~ m :> m C .~ '5 .., ~ E m E m ~ "- .E 1;; g-g UJu _ C - ~ mu. ~ ~ ~~ a. ~ ~'5 ~r 10'" a.u ~tij c-' '" 0 ~- lil.fJ a. a. :2 ,;, c 11: ~ ~ ~ m :> m C .~ '5 .., ;:- . m m~ m.. ;;:~ a.!!:. ci> c 'S; :E u 10 .E ~ m " a. <5 o ~ "C '6 m ~ <<l 7ii ~ g> 0.. CB td ~ ('(l 'S 0 C. E ~ ro 0 Oa5o ~8 LL. 'O.~ :::I L6 c.~ ~~ ,2 e 0 0 w (I) 0._ O"C ~-g,~ .~~ Q.-; : 15 ~ ~ o E.(I) 'o.s Q) ~ ~ c: 0 J:: OQ) Q)I- :::: e (3 .....>.,; .E 0.. ~ I:: ,Q2. ~~u 'EE ...... ,- c... ::= OlE ~'O tij.~ m ~ ~ ~'O m ..c I:: =a~$ :::8 o tij ~ E Co Q)_"C -g:E ca Iii 5 ~ -g Rt:.o i3..<<l :::I B 0 o.c: "C...o roo c 0 c: (I) 'in ctl- '(ij "C c: 3: (I) CIl I:: Q) (1) Q) Cl) .2,~ -- g g <..... ~ CD'" '- ... .... 0.. Cii'~ 012 C) I- '~~'~~Q$ ~~~.~~~ 0(:)0 5.~CO u iij ~ ~ 'e- o. a. U al 1;; a. E o o u c .. E ~ ~ o "0 ~ m .~ "0 ~ ~ m o o "- m :> .S E o a '" z ~ Z ~ ~ Z '" z ~ II :> .. C .~ '5 .., ~ m :> m C .~ '5 .., ~ m :> .. C ,~ '5 .., ~ .Q u: o m '0' 0: a. o ~ .Q u: c .. i5 ~ m ~ m m 0; a: u c o m ~ :> .g .. > o :> o ~ ~ :> o ~ ,; ~,~ Q) _ 0 ti o..E cOm ~~ (/) 68ca Q) ('(l "* E'!!! ~ ~~ 9- :::Im,g .a'~ ~ _gjgg> ,S'E '0 U.s'a ~ -g .0 C ~ g. 015 ~ ~Q)E c: "'" I- :; :5 ca ,2 ij) , 00,;:: ~.~ I ~,~~ ~~ ~ ! ~ fa ....u "C 5l.s g E ,5: c.. >."_ CIl 0 CiS o'~ ~;1i aJ ~tig. 'o.~:a ~~a. a~ fa g. c Q) (I) CL ('(l c: Ol CIl E 2 (3 a-LL,~ ~ -! ~ 1513-2.0 'e-,SU; ,~m~ ~ti c...>.Q) - v. Q) Q) =.... -gg>8.6ro:;.a~ -; ~ ~ ~ ~~'~ ~ E-gial3"Cmi5::8 (I) t: ~ ~ tij~(ij,~ -g:::l 0..'- "C c""= ('(l g"C ~Q) Q) ~ Q; ,- c ro 3: "C (1) > e~('(lls'~';;C}::Q -8~~ ~;Q),!!l Q) 0 u (/) ... -- J::- u.....,~ 6 g't\': o-g - E .... td -ii) Q) 0 (I) 0 ~ ~~.Q.o'e-c~ Iii Q)u-::OCLQ)('(lE '>'gO g"* ,!!! ~; E ~1::-2&-(/)FWF8 ~ ... z ~ Z ~ 0> C '0 0> ~ o ~ ~ m :> .. C ,~ '5 .., i; g ~d5 II m E ;; ...j II :> .. C .~ '5 .., "" ~ ~.!1 ~~ lli E ~ "'''' 0; ~ .E E ~ o u u '" c o ~ " o 0. ~ C ~ '" ~ " m ~ .~ as~ a: f'o-!::2:> 0:::1 Ii> _u. " <0", .. 81- :::I ",m 0 ~ c o td JE 'iji 0. UJ E m m ,s E o -! ca ..s E E .E Q) m E ,s m m UJ N C 'E 0 ell ~-m -gg'S ('(l'o e Ci5 au c .. 0: c m f- o :> .g .. > ~ '0 o m ';:: E ~~+:; o -0' ~ -; 0.:::; c m '" .Q;cu =5.96 6-g~ o t: g '3,* m 'ffa3: < ~ ,- E Iii'~ 3:~ U -g Q;'~ ~a;a .. c E m c CIl > ~ .s,g ~ ~~m g~.2 o-g-c >.om faum E '3 (:) g C? ~ .: J2 ,_ ~ m ~ Egs~ 5.:5 <<l ~ '0 0.. ::0 ~ '5 m 0 C? ' ,<=: (I) ~ g ~ a5 ,'m ~ g ~'E ~'o~.o o aE 55 ~ ~ ;;: .E ~ c :8 '6 c o a '5 m " '" o m '$ a: B ~ CIlg tij'o ceO: *~ Rlil =>a: :@.s .m ,S 'ffi"C @ ~ .!!!c c m ,2 Ol ca_5: Ell 5 m :gl\; ~ U; 5l :.:i 6 co. :8 gs o ~ .Qu 8Jiij c12 ..- ~m ~~ ~- c c o 0 au ~ m ~ 0 0'" 00.. -ll . aJo~ m i'~ (:) 1? ~ ~ c m ~ 0 a; Cl)~ 1i'> m(l).J:: .o~; -m;:~ u~m ~~~ "a E 8 m 8 "'~ !:: ~ cu <0; ... z ~ Ol C '0 Ol ~ o Ol c '0 Ol ~ o .. .. .. .. .' .. Ol Ol .. ,l; .. ;; .. -' c .2 o " 0; UJ ~ "5 ~ c o a o :> ,g .. > 00 o '" o ;; (/) a. :;: TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent January 4, 2008 Monthly Activity Report - December, 2007 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of December, 2007: I. SIGNS A. Total signs replaced ~ B. Total signs installed ---...1! C. Total signs repaired ~ n. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns --..J! III. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. B. Total square feet of A. C. repairs Total Tons 2.130 ~ A. N. CATCH BASINS Total catch basins cleaned ~ A. V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT Total square footage for right-of-way abatement --..J! VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. B. Total locations --.1! 6.198 Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. ~ New and repainted legends B. ~ L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping R:\MAlNrAIN\MOACTRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to ...&L service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimnring, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to ~ service order requests for tbe montb of November. 2007. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 90 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for tbe montb of December. 2007 was $ 2.230.00 compared to $ 24.560.00 for tbe montb of November. 2007. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 2,230.00 $ $ cc: Dan York, Deputy Director of Public Works / City Engineer Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Principal Engineer (Traffic) Amer Attar, Principal Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development) R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTRPT STREETNUUNTENANCECONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of December, 2007 Date: 12-17-07 RAINBOW CANYON RD REMOVE AND REPLACE DAMAGED SECTIONS OF GUARD RAIL # 5402 TOTAL COST $2,230.00 Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST Date: Date: # TOTAL COST Date: Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $2,230.00 R:\MAINTAIN\MOACfRPT '" o o N '" C _" 0 ~~~ ~I"C c: = ro ~ccca u ~ >. .. "E cn~ .c"C"C ::I ~ (l) U) "E m 2.00.. ro ::I 2:! 0Cf.>0.. 0::... 00 LL- .... . Cf.>0 oUJ 00 o '": ~ N CD .,; o N ... ... ~ cD ~ "!. ~ N ~ ... o ~ cD N '" cD ... o eo "'N ~ N 00 00 cd ...... o o 0' N CD .0 ~ ... 00 00 dd ...... 00 '" '" cO '" ... .,; o '" ... ~ o .,; eo eo .,; '" ~ ... o 0 o 0 ci c:i ... ... o o o cO CD ~ ~ N ... 0'" 0'" 0""': "'''' ~O arc>> "'~ ...... 00 o~ ON o~ "'''' arm ~... ... ~o "'0 cciC"i ...0 ON cO-n ...'" ...... '" ~ 0' '" ~ ~ ~ ... eo CD en '" ... ..; ... o o 0' ... o o o 0' ... ... o cO '" N ... '" ... o o .,; '" CD ... '" "l ~ N '" ..: ... ... ... .... a. 0: .... ~ ;; z. ~ z ;;: ;:; 0:: o o 0' o ... N ~ ... oeo oeo cicci 0'" "'0 "':cn ~... ... 00 00 cd "'... N~ ui~ ...... "'0 ~O aid "'''' NO MO N'" ...... eo '" cD ... '" cD '" ... eo eo N o N ... ... eo ...: N "!. ~ '" ... ... oeo 0'" cd "'''' ~O N"~ ...... o '" ... OCD o~ oeD "'eo "'... ..:'" ... ;:!: ...: '" eo ..; ... eo 0 CD ~ 0 CD c:i 0. ci '" ... '" N 0 r-: C"')"' ... N ... ~ CD o '" ~ o ~ '" eo '" ~ cD "'0 '" ~ CD 00 0 0 0'" o eo ... ... '" '" eo 00 0 0 0'" 0'" N 0 '" '" .,; cd 0' 0' ciai ci... 0' .,; 0' .,; '" ...... ... eo o CD ON 0 '" 0 eo '" N ...'" ...... '" '" '" '" .,; ..; N"~" ('1)'''': .,; ... ..; ...- N ... ...... ...... ... ... ... ... ... eo... 00 0 0 ... eo '" "'0 ... '" N 0 "'... ~ '" CD N 0 ~ ... '" Ul '" ... '" N ~I- cD .,; 0::0:: ~ OOUJ:g 5:0..00 OUJ2N -0::<(' a>zs ::::)I-Wo ... 00 ~ 0 00 0'" CD 0 ... '" ... 11.$I-N ... 00 0 0 OCD 0'" "'0 "': '" CD _20:: en do .,; cD c::ir-: c:i~ MO ~ 0' ... LL....- 00<(<( N ...... eo '" ",eo 00 CD'" 0 N eo ~ eo CD ...eo N~ ...~ ~ '" N ....<(:;;UJ N- .,; N ..:'" ...... -.:fa ... 0" ..; 2>-1->- N '" ... ... ...'" ~ ~ ... ~ ... ... N W...JW-I ... ... :;;J:UJ<( 1-1-0::0 0::2....~ ~ CD 00 CD ... '" ... eo CD ~ ... CD ... 0 <(OUlLL "'0 ~ '" '" '" ... N eo ...~ ... '" '" ~ ~ N 0..:;; ..: .,; ... UJ '" C 0 N- Gi Ui G.i Ui ':':i.: ':':i.: ;; Ui Ui ClC Cl"C .~~ .! 0 Cl ,,- " 0 .a:::jg~ ~.Q .5 .- " '0.... S" S" III " -0>- "...J "...J 0 " " 0 ~.fo ::;; ::;; 0 mOl LL LL o .c: f UJ"O cii f UJ 0 o::~o.. 2 ~ " 0:: ~ 0 " <( ~ 0:: " 2 " UJ i:i cii ,:.: 0 .,. UJ.,. UJ .,. ...J UJ Ul Ul l=Cf.> Cf.> .... 2 3: ,:.: 0 0 ::;; UJ :J UJ :J UJ ::;; :J 0 LL UJ ...J Ul a ::;; 0 0 UJ ...J iii: UJ ...J UJ 05 LL 0 UJ .... 0:: ...J .... UJ 0:: 2 0 0 2 <( <( 0.. m ;:: UJ UJ 2 Ul 0:: 0 m 0 0:: <( 2 ~ ...J <( UJ UJ <( 0 :J UJ <c ...J J: UJ 0 Ul Ul ~ 0 2 <( 0 0:: 0:: 0:: 0 ~ ::; 0.. 0.. .... .... 0 :J UJ Cf.> UJ 0 UJ .... ...J 0 UJ UJ ;:: 0 UJ 3: ...J ~ Z Cf.> 0:: ~ Ul UJ J: Ul <( :J u:: <( :J 0 0: Ul Ul 2 0:: 3i ...J J: 0 LL 0 ~ ;5 UJ iii: 2 2 <( ~ UJ 0.. 0 J: 0 0 0:: J: .... ci Ul .... ~ ~ UJ LL 0 <( iii Ul iii iii 0 0 Ul <( ~ .... <nz wo "'0: ~ C>::l c::lCJ ."'0 "")-1<( ..;. de::: om m ;; ~ ~>. "E OJ ~ "0"0 :J ~ l!? mE. ,*.g~ o mo. C W I- W ..J a.. :;; o Vi U.. ~o ad;: 0":' =::5 w'" uo:: Z<( <( w" Z >-V, ~z;;!l"' _U' <(Ill :;;;;;:11 W 'I- <( 'c' ~ ,.,...) '0:: <( w '>- o l.C)C'\l 0 I"- 0 ~ 0 '"' CD ai '"' "" III ';;;;J <( I- o l- Ll,;; ;';;;;J <( J: ~ :1Il ,~ OLONO I"- 0 ~ . o '"' CD ai '"' "" 0:: w III :;; w U w C 0000 o o "" '0:: 'W III ::;; 'w >0 z 0000 o o "" ,......." ~'I.;; ,c,m .Q ~'S " o 00"-0 o o '"' ~ ci '" "" I~' 'W i:m:: ,:;; ,~ ;1Il 'I- 'Ill' ',;:t C)' .,~: 0000 o o "" 00.....0 o o <Xl <Xl ai "" 'Y;c;, OLOOO I"- 0 ~ 0 N CD ai ~ "" >- ..J ';;), ;;~' iil 0:: '0 b ;~ I- ,z Q. ,u, '--'" - -'" :Elf!'.! u..",'" Q)....cCl) ....mcl- m 5-~ en 5-(1) U 0 C/) Q.) (1)(,) :!:: Qi 0l...J ~ t3 ~< Q.c.-J- cnO~O <(UCI- ""'c;" CD 0 ~ C! - '"' '" <Xl '"' <Xl o . - '" N '" ~ "" CDo~ ~ 0 I"- . - '"' '" <Xl '"' <Xl o _ . '" N '" ~ "" 000 o o "" 000 o o "" CDo~ ~ 0 I"- . - '"' '" <Xl '"' <Xl o _ - '" N '" ;;;; 000 o o "" 000 o o "" 000 o o "" 1ii C) '" z u.. g;wm 0::"'''' J-ll..5UJ Cl)m-.J.... I- Q.) ClCl) U.5:z0 <(-'<nU a::: Cl.!2...J I-c..o_ z'- '0.... o :EffiE; U(I)(I)I- .........q-o "'No '" . o ... o ..;: '" "" ~"'o "'No '" . o ... o ... '" "" 1"-1"-0 ~ 0 <Xi ... ~ ci ;;;; "'CDo o 0 N . <Xl CD CD ci N "" o~o o N ... '" "" 0"'0 o N I"- '" "" OCDO o ID <Xl '"' N "" o~o o ..;: N '" "" III 0:: o I- U <-0"0(1) " Q.) Q.) I- I-E1>1Il ZEEO 0.;:: Q)(,) UI-ll::..J W(I)U')<( WQ)Q.)1- a::: ~ ~O 1-1-1-1- 00 CDo CD . -0 ~o 0,", '" - '"' ;;;; 00 CDO CD. -0 ~o 0,", '" - '"' ~ "" 00 00 o. -0 CDo 0,", ~.o "" 00 o o "" 00 o o "" 00 o o "" 00 CDo CD . -0 '"'0 "'0 ~ - o ~ "" 00 o o "" ii: d (I) (9 Z >=1Il <(I- ll::1Il "-0 (l)U '..J $<( '1- 00 ll::1- COLOo>cooomQ)N l.C)C\I....-M......lOl.OJ'-..C'\I C"').....m.....f'..l.Oo)M(O C"i T'""- cD ... COl.C)O")CDOO(OC>>N I.ON......M......l.C)l.C)......N M......m.............I.OQ)MCO M-r- cD ... M....... '<;tooo 0..... co "I:tMlO O)(()O) ~ ~ ~ <0 ......comvOONMl.C) 1.0<.00...... ......mvC\l N ... '"' .0 ~ LOVCOVO............CDCO C"')...... MCOC\l("') ..... MN.....("') ..;: C\IMOo:)OOOI'-C"?(,,") (,0......0 LOC"')C")CO C'\I .........- C\l .,,; I'--v 0) M 0...... 00 v...... o oom COvLOC\I ~ ~ '" ai ......LO...........OCONN..... 1.0 m.....t--.1.00CDt-- I'--vC\l C') M cO =: w 0:: U w U Z <( Z W I- Z < :;; ~ (3 <n "E"C Q) C cn_ "'0 E & 1i)1..L.. Q) Q) Q) $ Q) ~f:i C -...J:J:JU) m ~"OOg, "0 O"O<(J!l:-roll::o; Q) "0 Q)"'O C .... > UQ)oo Q,)'-OQ.)O l2~.5 EE Q.) ~Cf.I"E E 0._ en > <Ll....0 '" Q.l (I) <<:5';:: > c::: ::s c::: c:::.f: lJ) 1-. ~ 4J (/)(/).c(/)$~ .2-- c c 0 4J .3: s... 2:tI:: .QJ.2Jm ~q 4J~ 4J ~ (I)(I)UI-ll:: Z <((1)(9 '" <Xl N '" '" .,,; '" N "" " w o => 0: '" >- >- ~ => :0 a. >- 0: ~ " z ;;; z " " '" '" <Xl N '" '" .,,; '" N "" CD CD o '" o .,,; N "" '" '" .,; <Xl '"'- I"- ... "" CD CD ai ... <Xl .,,; ... "" '" '" ai I"- CD r-:- N "" '" I"- .,; I"- CD ci ... "" CD <Xl o I"- ~ ~ '"' "" III I- III o U ..J ~ o I- CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (pOTHOLES) REPAIRS MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 12-03-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 217 2 12-07-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 61 2 12-10-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 80 2 12-11-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 184 2 12-12-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 88 2.5 12-13-07 MARGARITAlRAINBOW & YNEZ A.C. OVERLAYS 652 4 12-17-07 V AIL RANCH PKWY R&RA.C. 250 8 12-19-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 76 TEMP 12-20-07 CITY WIDE POTHOLE REPAIRS 127 3 12-26-07 29890 & 29887 VIA NORTE POTHOLE REPAIRS 8 TEMP 12-26-07 MARGARITA@RANCHOVISTA POTHOLE REPAIRS 3 TEMP 12-26-07 NICHOLAS ROAD POTHOLE REPAIRS 8 TEMP 12-27-07 PECHANGA ROAD POTHOLE REPAIRS 376 2.5 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 2.130 TOTAL TONS ...-ll R:\MAINTAINjWKCMPLTD\ASPHALT.RPR CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 12-03-07 CITY WIDE RAIN CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS 12-04-07 CITY WIDE RAIN CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 12-05-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS 12-10-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 26 CATCH BASINS 12-13-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS 12-17-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 18 CATCH BASINS 12-19-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS 12-20-07 AREA #4 CLEANED & CHECKED 15 CATCH BASINS 12-24-07 CITY WIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 28 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 154 R:\MAINTAlN\WKCMPLETD\CATCHBAS\ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 12-03-07 6TH ST. FELIX VALDEZ REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-03-07 VIA LAS COLINAS REMOVED 47 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-03-07 MARGARITA BRIDGE N/O WINCHESTER REMOVED 46 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-03-07 RED HAWK REMOVED 69 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-04-07 WINCHESTER RUSTIC GLEN REMOVED 14 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-04-07 SIB FRWY 1-15 TEMECULA PKWY REMOVED 55 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-05-07 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-05-07 PAUBA YNEZ REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-10-07 VIA EDUARDO REMOVED 600 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-10-07 44895 PlUTE REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-10-07 I-15FRWY OVERLAND BRIDGE REMOVED 302 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-10-07 BUTTERFILED STAGE TEMECULA CREEK REMOVED 179 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-11-07 OVERLAND DR V AIL RANCH PKWY REMOVED 19 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-13-07 I -15 FRWY CITY LIMIT TO CITY LIMIT REMOVED 1178 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-14-07 WINCHESTER BRIDGE REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 OVERLAND V AIL RANCH REMOVED 33 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 V AIL RANCH TEHACHAPI REMOVED 48 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 REDHAWK MUCmS REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 OVERLAND REDHAWK REMOVED 32 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL BIKE TRAIL REMOVED 252 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 WINCHESTER BRIDGE REMOVED 295 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 NORTH GENERAL KEARNY BRIDGE REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-17-07 1-15 FRWYNB AND SB REMOVED 87 S.F. OF GRAFFITI ~ R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFITI\ 1 12-18-07 FREESIA WAY REMOVED 72 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-19-07 JOLENE CT. @ VELMONT REMOVED 28 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-19-07 MARGARITA N/O WINCHESTER REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-20-07 BRENTWOOD AND BUTTERFIELD REMOVED 21 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-20-07 ANGELO ST REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-21-07 SAN JOSE CALISTA BURGUS REMOVED 80 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 GOLDS GYM PAroUNG LOT REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 64 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24~07 WINCHESTER ROAD UNDER BRIDGE REMOVED 20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 RANCHO CALIFORNIA BRIDGE REMOVED 10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 28566 FRONT ST. REMOVED 90 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 ACROSS FROM 28585 FRONT ST. REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 41945 FORTH ST. REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 42051 MAIN ST REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 V AIL RANCH PKWY JOHNSTON DR. REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 V AIL RANCH PKWY JOHNSTON DR. REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 V AIL RANCH PKWY 250 NORTH OF TEHACHAPI REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 V AIL RANCH PKWY 250 NORTH OF TEHACHAPI REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 VAIL RANCH WOLF VALLEY REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 TEHACHAPI PASS MARGE PLACE REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-24-07 44890 TEHACHAPI PASS REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFITI\ 2 12-24-07 V AIL RANCH @ CAMINO RUBANO REMOVED 52 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 33058 TERRACE DR. REMOVED 0 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 BUTTERFIELD STAGE S/O WOLF STORE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 REDHA WK BRIDGE REMOVED 800 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 BUTTERFIELD @ WOLF STORE REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 BUTTERFIELD BRIDGE REMOVED 40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 RAINBOW CANYON RD REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 BUTTERFILED S/O WOLF STORE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 32605 TEMECULA PKWY REMOVED 8 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 MAHON VAIL RD @ TEMECULA PKWY REMOVED 42 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 NIB 15 FRWY @ TEMECULA PKWY REMOVED 30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 MARGARITA @ SANTA GERTRUDES CREEK REMOVED 5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 SANTA GERTRUDES BEHIND CHAPARRAL mGH SCHOOL REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 SANTA GERTRUDE CREEK@ WINCHESTER REMOVED 91 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 33058 TERRACE DRIVE REMOVED 2 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-26-07 BUTTERFIELD STAGE @ WOLF STORE REMOVED 6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-27-07 31218 EONA CIRCLE REMOVED 84 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-28-07 WALLABY @ SEAGULL REMOVED 58 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-30-07 A VENIDAS DE MISSIONS REMOVED 480 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-30-07 V AIL RANCH @ CAMINO RABUNO REMOVED 18 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-30-07 MEADOWS/PAUBA REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-31-07 TOWER PLAZA CENTER REMOVED 131 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 12-31-07 WINCHESTER BRIDGE REMOVED 360 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 6.198 TOTAL LOCATIONS 71 R:\MAlNTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFITl\ 3 00. ~ O~ <~< ~u> ~~o u~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~os o~~ ~z~ ~~C-' ~~ u~t'-- ~Q <~ ~ ~ ~ )1 1 1 1 I I I I U W c > 0 Z I- 0 0 l- e.. w rn Cl :J <C ~ l- LL :J 0 ..., W en z + :J ..., ~ :;; ..J ii:: e.. <C a:: <C :;; In w u. Z <C ..., I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I cccccccccccccccccccccccccc cccccccccccccccccccccccccc CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~ ~~~~~~MMMMMNNNNN~~~~~ . ~ u ~ 2 ~ ~ " ~ ~ " .. ~ ClO ;;.. g Q,} ~:~ ;:.1;.,.,f .s ~ ~ ., Eo< == - = J! = = ... Eo< '=' M '=' o on M ..n 0\ ... = = ... <:i- 00 ., - - = U CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 .........bAf~'.[ t{scsiVEi6 .... ,.;.,.;. :;:; ::;:;:::;:~: : ~~: ~::~: .... ;:;:;:;:;::: .;.;.;.:.;.;.; ;.:.;.;.;.:.;. .............; :".....t!OcA'tlol\i....... ))j '. .;.;.;.;.;..... ::;:;:;:;:::;: ", .'~'.' H:n :)::~:::;::". ;.;. ';:;:: ", :.;.;.; .. :::';: .:.;.;. :;:Y:'- .,.;.",.; ';:::::::; .:-:..... ;:;:,.,.;:..;.;.;.;.;.", ..... ::;:::;:::;: " r: bATE WORK ;: iWWCOMPusTeoWi[i! ......... ................. ................ ............... ;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:; ....,;':,.;. :,.UREaOESln ':::"":':::'::::::::::::::::";':'::::::,:::::,::::::';'::; :::;:;:,:;:;:;:;:; ~r~::H::iYi .................. ................. :::;::;:;:;:;:;:; ............... ;:;:::;::;:;,;;;:;::::;;;:::::; <~u ....:............ ................. .:.:.:.:.;.;.;.;. .:.;.;.;.:.:.; 12/03/2007 28750 VALLEJO AVE SAND REMOVAL 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 29414 VIA NORTE SAND REMOVAL 12/03/2007 12/0312007 PINA COLDA @ VIA NORTE SINK HOLE 12/03/2007 12/0312007 40575 LA COLIMA CLOGGED DRAIN 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 LIEFER RD ROAD GRADING 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 BRIDEVIEW @ OLYMPIC POTHOLE 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 27521 MARIAN RD TREE TRIMMING 12/03/2007 12/0312007 ELLUCERO SAND REMOVAL 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 NICHOLAS RD POTHOLE 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 43675 EL FARGO DRAINAGE 12/03/2007 CONCERN 12/03/2007 MERLOT CT SNS MISSING 12/03/2007 12/03/2007 40440 CALLE TORCIDA SAND REMOVAL 12/03/2007 12/04/2007 KIMBERLY LN ROAD GRADING 12/07/2007 12/05/2007 MARGARITA RD @AVE SONOMA POTHOLE 12/05/2007 12/05/2007 NIGHTHAWK PASS HAZ MAT 12/05/2007 12/05/2007 RCRD POTHOLE 12/05/2007 12/0512007 KIMBERLY LN ROAD GRADING 12/05/2007 12/05/2007 31014 JEDEDIAH SMITH RD WEED 12/05/2007 ABATEMENT 12/05/2007 NICHOLAS RD ROAD GRADING 12/05/2007 12/06/2007 VIA NORTE WASH OUT IN 12/06/2007 R.OW. 12/06/2007 MARGARITA RD @ STONEWOOD POTHOLE 12/06/2007 12/06/2007 MARGARITA RD @ MORAGA POTHOLE 12/06/2007 12/06/2007 AVENIDA DEL SOL SAND DEBRIS 12/06/2007 1 R:IMAINTAINIWKCMPL TDISERVICE ORDER REQUESTSIJUL Y 2007 " JUNE 20081DECEMBER 07.xls .. j. CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 ........................ ........................ ,:,:.;,;-:.:.;.:.;.:.;.: ...... :":OAT~ "., .,"" RebelilEb:i .,. "', ..;.;.:.; ::,;,:;:,;,;:,,;, :.;.:.;.;.: :.:. :.;.:.;.:; i: n ~;:'~,~;:,~::; ::. . . .; .. ;; ....... i; ..;.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.........;::;;;: ;;;:;::;':'" "; ,." /E\ ;;,.. " .",'. ..". ';()AT~WORK: : ,.,.,.,.",.,. ':::~~Ui$~l: .. :,..':,:.',.:,C,.,',..'..p,,'..,.'M,."..,':','P:',:'!i;,.::,.,.:~,.:,':r:',.:,'Ii1:',.,P.'.,',.,',.':,:.'..; ;.;:;:~.;:~;;~~;C:.:'.. .... :,;,;;:, ;,;; :;;:;;;;\~;:;:;.: ;.:.;.;.:.;.:.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.:.; ;.;. ;:;;:;:;;:;;:;:. .; .. ;.:.:.;.;. :.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.:.; ;::;;:;.:.;.:.;.:.;.:.;..;.. :;;:;;:;; ..;.:.:.; ... . ..... ;::;::;::::: ,:,::;::::tbdAti6~;: ;:, ~ ;::::: .::;:;:: .;.:-:.... ;,;;:,:;:;:,:,;::;:,:;;,:;:;:::; WW~~:H~:~iiW~i .. .:.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:. .... ~:iH! .;.;.:.; 12/06/2007 MORANGA DELINEATORS 12/06/2007 DOWN 12/06/2007 VIA RAMI POTHOLES 12/06/2007 12/06/2007 32821 SAN JUAN CLOGGED 12/06/2007 STORM DRAIN 12/06/2007 31605 CALLE GIRASOL DRAINAGE 12/06/2007 CONCERN 12/07/2007 43978 EL LUCERO PLACE MUD DEBRIS 12/07/2007 12/07/2007 VIA LOBO DRAINAGE CRACKED WALL 12/07/2007 12/07/2007 PINA COLADA WASHED OUT 12/07/2007 R.OW. 12/0712007 30096 MIRA LOMA DRAINAGE 12/07/2007 CONCERN 12/07/2007 RANCHO CALIF R.D @MARGARITA POTHOLES 12/07/2007 12/07/2007 JESSIE CIRCLE ROAD GRADING 12/07/2007 12/07/2007 YNEZ @ OVERLAND DEBRIS IN 12/07/2007 GUTTER 12/08/2007 29722 RAMSEY CT. TREE TRIMMING 12/09/2007 12/10/2007 MORANGA DEBRIS 12/10/2007 12/10/2007 RAMSEY STORM DRAIN 12/10/2007 MAINTENANCE 12/10/2007 AVENIDA DEL SOL STORM DRAIN 12/10/2007 MAINTENANCE 12/10/2007 42097 VIA CUESTA AL SOL DEBRIS PICKUP 12/10/2007 12/10/2007 NICOLAS RD ROAD GRADING 12/10/2007 12/10/2007 45501 CLUBHOUSE DEBRIS PICKUP 12/10/2007 12/11/2007 VIA LA COLORADO SINK HOLE 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 27597 CHANTEMAR WAY MUD ON 12/11/2007 SIDEWALK 12/11/2007 VIA PERALES SIGN MISSING 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 27600 STANFORD SAND DEBRIS 12/13/2007 2 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPL TD\SERVICE ORDER REQUESTSIJUL Y 2007 - JUNE 2008\DECEMBER 07.xls CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF DECEMBER, 2007 ~;~;~;:;:\<\;; .; .;.:.; :::~ ........... "!::/\ '. .. .... :.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.: :.:.;.;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;: ::;:::::; .;.;.; ;.;.:;.....:;:.:: ::.,- :::::::: .. :;=; ~~~1t~ep;'::..:i:i:i.iii::;iiili;::iiii::~~~~~iQ~I!I!1!1!lilil:li!lilil!!!!i!I:!!ill!!I!!lli!illl :fij!lil~~~~I~li:III.!! ii!i!~~~'111.:.: :;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:; ::::;::: .:.:.:.:.:::::~;:;:::':"'....., ~~ " ::;:;::-:-:.:.:;:;:: ';":: ", ................. :::::::::::::<;/;\:.;. ...... "':-:'::;:~:~/~)!~i:~Ui:n:~~~nj .... i<<;;:;;;;;;;:;; ;.:.;.;.;.;.:. ... ....:.:.::..::::::..:.:.: :!!:H ... . ::::::::::::'::':', :':':':':::'~:::::::::~:::::~':':' ,=;=,=,=::;:;=;=;=;:;=;,' ;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;. ;:~;:L:::::::::::: .. ..:.:.:.:..........:..;. 12/12/2007 PECHANGA DR. SIDEWALK 12/12/2007 REPAIR 12/12/2007 PAUBA POTHOLES 12/12/2007 12/13/2007 CAMINO SAN DIMAS SINK HOLE 12/13/2007 12/14/2007 REDHAWK PKWY DEBRIS 12/14/2007 12/17/2007 32192 CALLE RESACA TREE REMOVAL 12/17/2007 12/17/2007 NICHOLAS RD ROAD GRADING 12/27/2007 12/19/2007 MARIPOSA PLACE R.C. REPAIR 12/19/2007 12/19/2007 WYANDOTTE A.C. REPAIR 12/19/2007 12/19/2007 31596 CORTE ROSARIO EROSION 12/19/2007 CONCERN 12/19/2007 SANTIAGO ROAD GRADING 12/19/2007 12/20/2007 MARGARITA @ STONEWOOD SHOPPING 12/21/2007 CARTS 12/26/2007 MARGARITA@ DEPORTOLA SIGN REPAIR 12/26/2007 12/26/2007 VIA NORTE (MEADOWVIEW) POTHOLES 12/26/2007 12/27/2007 42568 CANDIDA PLACE TREE TRIMMING 12/27/2007 , TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUEST 61 3 R:IMAINTAINIWKCMPL TDlSERVICE ORDER REQUESTSIJUL Y 2007 - JUNE 2008\DECEMBER 07.xls CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF DECEMBER 2007 12-3-07 WINCHESTER & ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH INSTALLED WI1-7, REPAIRED 5 12-06-07 GREAT OAK HIGH SCHOOL AREA INSTALLED 7R-30, REPLACED 2 12-6-07 OLD KENT ROAD INSTALLED 4 SIGNS 12-11-07 MARGARITA MORAGA REPLACED 5 REPLACED, REPAIRED 3 12-11-07 VIA LA COLORADA INSTALLED 5 R-30 12-12-07 CITY WIDE REPLACED 4 12-13-07 VIA LA COLORADA INSTALLED 5R-30 12-17-07 CITY WIDE REPLACED 2 REPLACED, REPAIRED 2 12-17-07 VIA PERALES INSTALLED 3 REPAIRED 30 12-18-07 KOHINOOR DR. INSTALLED 5 REPLACED 30 12-18-07 CITY WIDE REPLACED 14 REPAIRED 12 12-19-07 CITY WIDE REPLACED 4 REPAIRED 19 12-20-07 CITY WIDE REPLACED 8 REPAIRED 12 12-21-07 BERGAMO CT. INSTALLED 1 W14-1 12-21-07 MEADOWS PARKWAY REPAIRED 2 RZ-26 12-26-07 MARGARITA DE PORTOLA REPLACED R4-7 12-27-07 LOW FLOW REPLACED 1 RI1-2 12-27-07 LOW FLOW REPLACED 1 K - MARKER 12-27-07 LOW FLOW REPLACED 1 L-MARKER TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED: 43 TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED: 31 TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED: 55 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\SIGNS\ MEMORANDUM TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer FROM: dJ'fb Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent DATE: December 6, 2007 SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - November, 2007 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel for the month of November, 2007: I. SIGNS A. B. C. II. TREES A. Total signs replaced Total signs installed Total signs repaired 54 68 39 Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 14 m. ASPHALT REPAIRS A. B. . 6.538 74 Total square feet of A. C. repairs Total Tons A. IV. CATCH BASINS 209 Total catch basins cleaned A. V. RlGHT-OF-WAYWEEDABATEMENT o Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. B. Total locations 34 15,525 Total S.F. VII. STENCILING A. ~ New and repainted legends B. 1,190 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping R:\MAINT AIN\MQACTRPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to ~ service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, AC. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to ~ service order requests for the month of October, 2007. The Maintenance Crew has also put in -2L hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and response to street emergencies. The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of November, 2007 was $24,560.00 compared to $40,150.00 for the month of October, 2007. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 $ 24,560.00 $ -0- $ -0- cc: Dan York, Deputy Director of Public Works / City Engineer Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works Ali Moghadam, Principal Engineer (Traffic) Amer Attar, Principal Engineer (Capital Improvements) Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development) R:\MAINTAIN\MOACTRPT ",2 W 0 ~ J: '" 0" :> U ~ CD . J: 0 ~ ~ ~ o "'"' -0 :m ~>. "E OJ -g 2-g en .~ ro *-g~ 0'" a. o W I- W ""co 0..0 :;;0 0':' 0::; ~o o<:N 00<: s:;:5 w>- 0.... Z<c <Co ZtIl w- I-LL Z <( :;; ~ ~ W 'I- <C '0 ;:0:( .r.- 0<: <C :w, >- CLONe .... 0 ~ c:i '" <D ai '" '" ,tIl ,';;;.J <C I- o I- :LL ;;;;J <C :c ,I- tIl ir CLONO .... 0 ~ , o '" <D ai '" '" 0<:' 'w ,Ill :;; w o 'W :0 0<: w III :;; w 1) Z , 0000 o c:i '" OOT'""o o c:i '" ~ c:i '" '" 0000 o c:i '" ~ ~ 00""0 o c:i co co m '" ~ ~ 01.000 .... 0 ~ . o N <D ai ;;; _1il mce..!Q LL.," Q)....cCl) ....COct- ro s-jgU) 5-00 0 0 (I) CD Q)(,) ..... ..... C)..J m ~ ctI or::( li g.!: I- (l)O~O <CUOI- > " <DO~ ~ 0 .... . , '" '" co :g ~ - '" N '" ~ '" <DO r:: 0 oi to '" co o co ('\f cri '" ;;; 000 o c:i '" <DO~ ~ 0 .... , , '" '" co '" co o _ - '" N '" ;;; 000 o c:i '" 000 o c:i '" 000 o c:i '" 1il ~ ., Z LL ~Q)ro 0<:"" I- u.. .s C/J tAffi...J1- I- Q) 0>(1) (,).S.s 0 <c....1i>0 a: ad!! ...J J- ,f: :g <C t5:S~b o en en I- "....0 ~T""q N '" co "" N '" "....0 o~o N , N '" co "" N '" ,,<Do o 0 N , co <D to c:i N '" O~O ~ N " '" '" 0"'0 o N .... '" '" O<DO o cD co '" N '" O~O o '" N '" '" tIl 0<: o I- o <C"O"OCI) D:::Q)Q)I- I- E ~ CI) ZEEO 0,<:: Q)O 01-0::.... WCf)Cf)<C WQ)Q)I- D:::~~O 1-1-1-1- 00 <Do <D , .0 "'0 "'0 ~ - o ;;; 00 <Do <D , '0 "'0 ~OR o ~ '" 00 o c:i '" 00 o c:i '" 00 o c:i '" 00 <Do <D , .0 "'0 "'0 ~c:i ;;; 00 o c:i '" f- W W LL d en Cl z :;:tIl ~lii 0..0 eno '.... 5<C 'I- <:>0 0::1- LO-.:tLOCDOOCOCOV T""o)COM"""-LOCOT""C\1 M """-T"""""-LO"""-MV M~ 0 " LOVI.OCOOOCOCOV T""O')COM"""-LOCOT""N M """-T"""""-LO,....Mv cri"": 0 ... -.:tCOO')VOONMLO LO<.oOT"" T""O)-.:tN N " '" .0 ~ I.O-.:tCOVO"""-"""-COCO M,.... MCOC\lM T"" MC\lT""M "" NMOCOOCO"""-C"')C"') COT""O 1.OC"')C"')CO C\I T""T"" N M """-v 0) C"') 0 """-co v """- o coO) COvl.OC\I ~ ~ '" ai """-LOT"""""-OCONC\lT"" 1.0 O')T"""""-LOOc.o"""- """--.:tN M C"')- cO s: w 0<: o w o Z <C Z W I- Z <( :;; >- l- e::; '" c -g Cf)....... Q)Q) .......u.. "0 EClCf)lfio- ~ Q)Q).......::J ctI ro....J::J 0"00 Q) .c-cOQ) I -c U-c<C,$-C:::-ro CI) Q) -c Q) -c c: ctI '- > I- ~~~EQ)'mOQ)o CI) a.~'Ci5E.g!a.~"EE 0 Q) Cf) ctI'c>2 ::JOf!l. 0 C:::C:COJ- ,u..oQ) ...J Cf);..c: Cf)5:~I,QE <C c:c:OQ) '~'-2::= I- .Q',Q'ro~qQ).mQ)~ 0 enenUl-o::z<cenCl I- .... ~ N <D '" c:i N '" " w o ::> n: J: .. ~ :> ::> a. .. '" ~ " z ~ 2 :;: :;; 0: .... ~ N <D '" c:i ~ N '" '" '" .,; co '" ..: " '" <D <D ai " co M " '" '" '" ai .... <D ..: N '" '" .... .,; .... <D c:i " '" <D co c:i .... ~ u:; '" .. .... '" .. .. ... .. .. - .. ... 0 ... .. ... I- ... a. "': "0 ... .. 0 .. .. - ... .. - .. .. .. "l 0: e 00 cO cO ci ,..: ci N cO ..; ci ci cO cD l- e - - N '" ...... ." co '" ." .. - .. .. ." ... ... ." '" () ,..: co .. "!. -.. "'''' "N "!. N co ... <( '" " oi' oi' - 0;0; men cOaO - .; ... ...: 0 Q; Q) e ;; .<= .. .. N ...- -... ..... - '" .... .c Cl" N ... ... ...... ... ...... ... ... ... 2 E ,,'" ... ... ... ~ 1l I '" l'! 2 " J 0 co.cc -c ~ ... .. - .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0: >." - 0 .. .. .... .. .. .. .. co .. .. ~ ,gl ci ci cD ci 000 ci ..; ci ci .,; cD N ,..: 'e '" >- ." N .. 0 "'.. .. .. .. ... ." .. .. ." '" .. co .. .. ...." ... ... .... "- - N .. .c "'", .; ..- oi' N IO~ "'~ ...f"N' 0;0 ... oi' ... .; " ~ ~ - - ... - -... ...... -.. ... N .. m E '" - ... - ... ... ...... ... .. .$! "- ... ... ... .c ~ '" :> Cl me.. 0:.... 00 ...- t;> 00 OZ tIl ~I- 0<:0<: OOWCO 5:0..0:5 UWZN -O<:<C ~>z~ ::::)I-WQ o..:;:!z'" LL i= -<C O<:<c 00 I-<C:;;W z>-I->- W..JW..J :;;:cW<C 1-1-0<:0 o<:zl-!!J <COtllLL 0..:;; W o o W... ~I-o ~ w. O::...J . 00.> :=:;;0 OZ o ... .. .,; N - N N ... -co "'0 ..- ...: Qi in Ol" J!l 0 01- o LL ~ '" " 0- Ul ~ 0: ~ ... o w a. o o Ul o <( .... -' <C I 0.. Ul <( .. '" ..; .. '" .. N .... .... de ...... .... ...... '" <Ii .. .. .. .. .... 00 ...... .. .. Gi en Ol'" o::J9~ ~&~ ~~~ 0: '" W " .... 0- ....Ul ::l Cl oll III 0: ::l o ~ -' ~ w o in ,:.; W W LL 0: <C w z :; Cl z 0: 12 .... m .. .. ci ... .. - .. .,; .. .. oi' ... ;; co - .... oi' '" .. N rii o z w Cl W -' Cl z >= z ;;;: e.. W Ul ::l o I ~ .. o ci .. '" .. ... 0.. .... cien .. co ...... N~ ...... o - .. .. '" .. .. cD ." co N ... .... ..co 0"": "'.. ..... -"... ... .... ... ... '" ... c; ~ '1: .c .$! '" ..-' :;; Cl W o :s e.. w 0<: Ul Z Cl in .. .. .... 0.0:: ON ..... M"~ ...... .. co 8; o~ .. .. N _ ...... .. c; g "i: .Q .$ .. .....J :;; t:l W ...J ...J ;:: Ul 2!: Ul z Cl in >= u: ... ~ ~ '" N '" '" - .. ... ... .; a; Ol J!l o o LL f .. " 0- Ul .. '" ci .. ... '" ... "'0 .. N co .. ..... C"io co '" ..- ";0 ...... ... co_ ... - en Ui co; "en c '" c ca3~ W 0 Z <( W ...J o Ul -' W Z Z <( I o W Cl <C Z ;;;: 0<: o o w :;; :;; 12 .... Ul W W 0: I- W Ul ::l o I ~ .. "! '" '" ... ... .. - .. "': - o - ... .. rii .... m w ::l G w 0: 0: w o 0: o W o ~ w m ... ." ci o '" .. ... ... .. N ." '" ... ci N ." o - ... co N - ... co N rii .... ::l o ...J ...J <( o ~ ::l o I 0<: W .... ... <( ." ." .,; .. '" ...: .. ... .. ... co .; .. N .. - N ... .. ,:.; z w :;; w !;;: '" <( o w w := ;;: ci Ii. Ul ...J ;:: o I- STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of November, 2007 riiTlI, DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST I OF WORK SIZE .. ".."". <,.., .',.. .. '. ....,' .,.. < ..,' Date: 11/21/07 RAINBOW CANYON ROAD REMOVED DAMAGED GUARD RAIL AND PAUBA ROAD REPLACED WITH NEW # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 4,810.00 Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # TOTAL COST ..... ....".' . ",",'..,." IL " ..'.. ..,'. ,..'..))).'"..."" ',H ,.,.< . ,,'. < Date: 11/07 CITYWIDE WEED ABATEMENT, TRASH & DEBRIS CLEAN- UP # 5402 TOTAL COST $ 19,750.00 Date: # TOTAL COST .';' ..'.', < .'... ..'. ..'..".. .,., ',.. '. , .,",'.".'". ..',.., .',... .. , '. , ., Date: # TOTAL COST Date: # I TOTAL COST TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $24,560.00 TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 , R:\MAINTAINIMQACTRPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION ASPHALT (pOTHOLES) REPAffiS MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 11/01/07 V AIL RANCH PARKWAY R&R A.C. 450 12 11/05/07 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY R&R A,C, 710 12 11/06/07 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY R&R A.C. 634 12 11/07/07 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY R&R A,C. 500 7 11/08/07 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY R&R A,C. 500 6,5 11/13/07 PECHANGAPARKWAY A,C. OVERLAY 840 3 11/19/07 MASTERS / PALMETTO A,C, OVERLAY 582 4,5 11/20/07 CREEKSIDE A.c. OVERLAY 415 3.5 11/27/07 GLENEAGLES / BARDMORE COURT A,C, OVERLAY 506 4 11/28/07 W AILEA COURT / BRIDGEVIEW A.C. OVERLAY 598 4,5 11/29/07 GREENVIEW / VIA GlLBERTO A.C. OVERLAY 803 5 TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 6.538 TOTAL TONS 74 R:\MAINTAINIWKCMPLTD\ASPHALT.RPR CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 11/01/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 9 CATCH BASINS 11/05/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 17 CATCH BASINS 11/06/07 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 11/07107 AREA #2 CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS 11/08/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS 11/13/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 21 CATCH BASINS 11/14/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 13 CATCH BASINS 11/15/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 8 CATCH BASINS 11/19/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 19 CATCH BASINS 11/20/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 12 CATCH BASINS 11/26/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 25 CATCH BASINS 11/27/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 11 CATCH BASINS 11/28/07 AREA #3 CLEANED & CHECKED 20 CATCH BASINS 11/29/07 CITYWIDE CLEANED & CHECKED 11 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 209 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLETD\CATCHBAS\ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 11101107 VIA REINA AT MEADOWS P ARKW A Y REMOVED 220 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11/01/07 MIRA LOMA EDISON PLANT REMOVED 220 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11101107 SOLANA WAYE/OMARGARITA REMOVED 33 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/01107 RANCHO VISTA AT EMWD EASEMENT REMOVED 45 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11102/07 CROWNEHILL/PAUBA REMOVED 16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11105/07 BUTTERFIELD AT BRENTWOOD REMOVED 70 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11105/07 RANCHO VISTA AT VIA VISIANA REMOVED 180 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11105/07 WINCHESTER BRIDGE REMOVED 39 S,F. OF GRAFFITI 11106/07 DATE AT YNEZ REMOVED 6 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11107/07 ELGIN COURT REMOVED 121 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11108/07 TARGET CENTER REMOVED 85 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11109/07 BUTTERFIELD STAGE BRIDGE REMOVED 11,100 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11109/07 REDHAWKPARKWAY REMOVED 4 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11113/07 LOMA LINDA AT PECHANGA PARKWAY REMOVED 34 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11113/07 V AIL RANCH PARKWAY REMOVED 68 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 111 13/07 1-15 FREEWAY AT YNEZ REMOVED 73 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11113/07 WINCHESTER ROAD BRIDGE REMOVED 119 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/15/07 TEMECULA CREEK BRIDGE AT MARGARITA REMOVED 711 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11116/07 LA SERENA AT VIA AGUILA REMOVED 10 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11116/07 MARGARITA OVERLAND TO GEORGETOWN REMOVED 112 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11119/07 MARGARITA / WINCHESTER REMOVED 197 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11/19/07 V AIL RANCH AREA REMOVED 337 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11120/07 MUIRFIELD / PECHANGA PARKWAY REMOVED 47 S,F, OF GRAFFITI R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFITI\ 11/21/07 CAMPANULAATVOLTA REMOVED 25 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/26/07 FELIX VALDEZ AT 6TH REMOVED 95 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11/26/07, NIGHTHAWK AT MONTICELLO WAY REMOVED 68 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/26/07 EMPIRE CREEK REMOVED 78 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 1/26/07 MARGARITA / WINCHESTER BRIDGE REMOVED 238 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/27/07 VIA LA VIDA AT VIA RENATE REMOVED 10 S.F, OF GRAFFITI 11/27/07 KOHLSONTEMECULAPARKWAY REMOVED 180 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11/27/07 REDHAWKATOVERLAND REMOVED 17 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/28/07 BUTTERFIELD STAGE BRIDGE REMOVED 914 S,F, OF GRAFFITI 11/28/07 NIGHTHAWK PASS AT MONTICELLO WAY REMOVED 35 S.F. OF GRAFFITI 11/29/07 JERRY LANE REMOVED 18 S.F, OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 15.525 TOTAL LOCATIONS 34 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\GRAFFITI\ 00 ~ O~ <~< ~u> ~~o u~~ ~=~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~os o~~ ~z~ ~~~ ~~ u~t' ~= <~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U iLl c ~ z I- U 0 l- e.. w VI Cl :J <C >- I- ..J LL. :J a .., w t/) z + :J .., ~ :;; ..J ii! e.. <C a: :i III W u. ~ .., 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 ~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~~~~M~ ~~~~~~MMMMMNNNNN~~~~~ J,;,i. .. ... ;:.. Q,) ~ '" ;:=~ "" ~ as c.S>6....~ '" Eo-< El -; .~ ...... Q,) ~ ~ r-- = = N [) M M " " ~ M .0 ~ t: " S j: B .0 " 0 ~ "" tl > " "3 " ~ " ...., en 0 0 ~ ~ u " i ~ ~ z ~ " N III .... <:i: 00 III '" III .... co co r;.;. o:r 1J1 '" - - .. u CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 11/09/07 RANCHO VISTA AT MEADOWS P ARKW A Y TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TREES 11109/07 NICOLAS ROAD TRIMMED 6 R.O.W. TREES 11/26/07, 28075 JEFFERSON TRIMMED 4 R,O,W, TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED --...ll R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTD\TREES CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 ...' ... , DATE ..,... .. DATE WORK REC'D >T"''' .>>ii ,."> COMPLETED .. .... F1\.11X ..".'..' ..,.. iT , 11/01/07 CAMINO SAN DIMAS SIGN MISSING 11/01/07 11/01/07 RANCHO VISTA ROAD TREE TRIMMING 11/01/07 11/02/07 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD SIGN TURNED 11/02/07 11/02/07 RUSTIC GLEN SIGN MISSING 11/02/07 11/05/07 32144 CAMINO NUNEZ STUMP GRIND 11/05/07 11/05/07 32970 ROMERO DRIVE STUMP GRIND 11/05/07 11/05/07 32879 LEVI COURT STUMP GRIND 11/05/07 11/05/07 45169 VIA QUIVERA A.C. REPAIR 11/05/07 11/05/07 32085 CAMINO SENECO ROOT PRUNE 11/05/07 11/07/07 MARGARITA TREE LIMB 11/07/07 11/07/07 EONA CIRCLE STORM DRAIN CLEANING 11/07/07 11/07/07 42825 NORTH STAR COURT TREE TRIMMING 11/07/07 11/08/07 TEJON COURT SNS MISSING 11/08/07 11/08/07 JOSEPH STREET DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/08/07 11/08/07 38685 DE PORTOLA CHANNEL CLEANING 11/08/07 , 11/08/07 NICOLAS ROAD TREE TRIMMING 11/08/07 11/13/07 MORAGA DEBRIS PICK-UP 11/13/07 11/13/07 31977 CORTE SOLEDAD STUMP GRINDING 11/13/07 11/13/07 33203 CORTE YACA TREE REPLACEMENT 11/13/07 11/14/07 32144 CAMINO NUNEZ STUMP GRIND 11/14/07 11/14/07 CORTE POSITAS DRAIN CLOGGED 11/14/07 11/14/07 32337 CALLE RESACA STUMP GRINDING 11/14/07 11/15/07 MOTEL 6 WATER RUNNING 11/15/07 11/15/07 VAIL RANCH PARKWAY A.C. REPAIR 11/26/07 11/16/07 31266 CORTE TALVERA ROOT PRUNING 11/16/07 R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTD\SORS\ ," /;. C,- "7 ---- < DATE I DATE WORK REC'D .,. .., ,"","" .',' REQPEST COMPLETED .... 11/18/07 32265 CORTE CHATADA SIGN DOWN 11/18/07 11/19/07 DELREY SIGN REPLACEMENT 11/19/07 11119/07 'NO. GENERAL KEARNY BRANCHES IN STREET 11/19/07 11/19/07 MORAGA DEBRIS 11/19/07 11/19/07 27415 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE DRAIN BLOCKED 11/19/07 11120/07 30490 SHENANDOAH COURT STUMP REMOVAL 11120/07 11/20/07 45704 MASTERS DRIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL 11/20/07 11/20/07 31378 CORTE SONORA BEES IN MANHOLE 11120/07 11/20/07 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YUKON DEBRIS 11/20/07 11/26/07 MARGARITA DOG PARK DEBRIS PICK-UP 11126/07 11126/07 MORAGA DEBRIS PICK-UP 11126/07 11/26/07 NADA LANE WEED ABATEMENT 11/26/07 11/29/07 27280 JEFFERSON TREE DOWN 11129/07 11/30/07 PAUBA ROAD AT CALLE VISTA ROAD CLOSURE (COUNTY) 11/30107 11/30/07 JEFFERSON FLOODING 11/30107 11/30/07 V AIL ELEMENTARY FLOODING 11130/07 11130/07 VAIL RANCH DEBRIS 11/30/07 11/30107 PECHANGAPARKWAY FLOODING 11/30/07 TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS ~ R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTD\SORS\ "/ ;~ '> CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 ll/O 1/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 8 REPAIRED 12' 1l/02/07 RUSTIC GLEN / STONEWALL REPLACED 1 REPAIRED 4 11/06/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 4 REPAIRED 1 11/06/07 HARVESTON INSTALLED 6 NEW R-2 1l/07/07 HARVESTON INSTALLED 15NEWR-2 1l/08/07 LOS RANCHITOS INSTALLED 11 NEW R-2 1l/09/07 CAMPANULA AT DE PORTOLA INSTALLED 1 NEW R-2 11/09/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 2SNS 11/14/07 CITYWIDE INSTALLED 13 NEW R-2 1l/15/07 CITYWIDE INSTALLED 7NEWR-2 1l/19/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 11 REPAIRED 10 1l/20/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 12 REPAIRED 5 11/26/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 2 REPAIRED 1 1l/27/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 6 REPAIRED 1 1l/27/07 CITYWIDE INSTALLED 3R-2 11/28/07 CITYWIDE REPAIRED 5 1l/29/07 CITYWIDE REPLACED 8 INSTALLED 12 TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED ~ TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED -.&l! TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED ---12 R:\MAINTAIN\WKCMPLTD\SIGNS\ CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2007 11/01/07 AREA #3 REPAINTED 57 LEGENDS 11/05/07 AREA #3 REPAINTED 51 LEGENDS 11/06/07 AREA #3 REPAINTED 27 LEGENDS 11/07/07 HARVESTON INSTALLED 28 LEGENDS 11/08/07 HARVESTON INSTALLED 19 LEGENDS 11/13/07 AREA #4 REPAINTED 51 LEGENDS 11/14/07 LOS RANCHITOS INSTALLED 14 LEGENDS 11/15/07 CITYWIDE INSTALLED 10 LEGENDS 11/19/07 AREA #5 REPAINTED 65 LEGENDS 11/26/07 AREA #5 REPAINTED 41 LEGENDS 11/27/07 AREA #5 REPAINTED 20 LEGENDS 11/28/07 ' DEPORTOLA REPAINTED 27 LEGENDS 11/29/07 AREA #1 REPAINTED 1,190 LF RED CURB TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. --..lli! 1.190 R:\MAINTAIN\WRKCOMPLTD\STRIPING