HomeMy WebLinkAbout08_005 PC Resolution
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO
CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL, A
HELlPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE
FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT
FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31
ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA
PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY
700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001
THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH
959-080-010 (PA07-0200)"
Section 1. Procedural FindinQs. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. ("UHS") filed Planning
Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change
to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are
hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31
acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet
west of Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through
959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project").
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
C. On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general
public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this
Project.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (01-09-200B).OOC
.
E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning
Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental
Impact Report for the Project.
F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October
28, 2005.
G. On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning
Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-01
recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-04, recommending approval of the Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463).
J. On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all
persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
K. On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the
City Council and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution
No. 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBERS PA04-0462 (GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT) PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP)
AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF
APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004
AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463,
PA04-0571)."
G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (01-09-200B).DOC .
2
.
L. On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Conditional Use
Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463) at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
M. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 06-07, approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for
the Project (PA04-0463).
N. On February 24, 2006, the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic each filed a separate petition challenging the City of
Temecula's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project proposed by Universal
Health Services, Inc.
O. On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ordered that the
City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, including without limitation, its
certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and all related approvals and
permits, until the City of Temecula has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project
into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Riverside
County Superior Court ruled in favor of the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic, holding that: (1) the MTBE plume was not properly analyzed
in the Final Environmental Impact Report; (2) the siren noise at the hospital was
significant and should have been mitigated; and (3) not all feasible traffic mitigation
measures were adopted for cumulative traffic impacts.
P. The Riverside County Superior Court also held that the Final
Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare,
and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources; (4)
geology and soils mitigation: and (5) land use consistency.
Q. On July 12, 2007, another scoping session was held to determine the
extent of issues to be addressed in the new Environmental Impact Report for the
Project.
R. In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a new
Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and
circulated for public review from November 5,2007 through December 5, 2007.
S. On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning
Application Numbers PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone
Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan),
PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by
reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on
the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road,
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (01-09-200B).DOC
3
.
known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-
007 through 959-080-010 Project, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify
either in support of or opposition to this matter.
T. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-01 recommending
that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project
and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
U. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City
Council approve the proposed Development Plan, Planning Application No. PA07-0200,
subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
V. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending
approval of the Development Plan, Planning Application No. PA07 -0200, as required by
Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code hereby finds, determines and
declares that:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of
Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of
the City. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals and policies in the General
Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development Code and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the
Project has been reviewed and as designed and conditioned, it has been determined
that the Project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, State law and the
General Plan.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public, health, safety and general welfare. The overall development of the land has
been designed for the protection of the pUblic health, safety, and general welfare,
because the Project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the
surrounding neighborhood and the Project has been reviewed and conditioned to
comply with the uniform building and fire codes.
Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Development Plan
to construct a 408,160 square foot hospital, a helipad, two medical office buildings
totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square
foot fitness rehabilitation center all totaling approximately 566,160 square feet on 35.31
acres, located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of
Margarita Road, known as Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-
004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 as set forth in Application No. PA07-0200,
subject to the specific Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, Draft City Council
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (Ol-09-200B).DOC
4
.
Resolution, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set
forth in full.
Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 9th day of January 2008.
"
\
I
---
-..." (
,
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
7Ir!J?/A/~ ~}L-
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
- "..,
--..;~
. .,
-
[S~bl
-":. '::'
~
-0..
~
-- ."
. ....
'......... v ....,.,.~_~
J
STATE OF CALlFORKl{A )
COUNTY OFRIV~R-SIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMEGULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08-05 was duly and regularly adopted by the
Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the
9th day of January 2008, by the following vote:
AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN: 1
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
~/;;~. ~ >z-
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (01-09-200B).DOC
5
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 08-_
G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0198 Temecula Regional Hospital GPA, SEIR\Planning\Planning Commission\Draft Resolutions\PC\Dev
Plan Resolution (01-09-200B).DOC
6
.
RESOLUTION NO. 08-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO CONSTRUCT A 408,160 SQUARE FOOT HOSPITAL,
A HELlPAD, TWO MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDINGS
TOTALING 140,000 SQUARE FEET, A 10,000 SQUARE
FOOT CANCER CENTER AND AN 8,000 SQUARE FOOT
FITNESS REHABILITATION CENTER ALL TOTALING
APPROXIMATELY 566,160 SQUARE FEET ON 35.31
ACRES, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA
PARKWAY (HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH), APPROXIMATELY
700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001
THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH
959-080-010 (PA07-0200)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findinqs. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. Universal Health Services of Rancho Springs, Inc. ("UHS"), filed Planning
Application Numbers PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-0302, Zone Change
to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463, Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map in a manner in accord with
the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code, which applications are
hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31
acres generally located on the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet
west of Margarita Road, known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through
959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through 959-080-010 ("Project").
B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, public notice in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").
C. On April 6, 2005, the Planning Commission considered the Project at a
duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or
opposition to this matter.
D. The Planning Commission, based on testimony presented by the general
public, determined that an Environmental Impact Report would be required for this
Project.
.
E. On April 20, 2005, a scoping session was held before the Planning
Commission to determine the extent of issues to be addressed in the Environmental
Impact Report for the Project.
F. A Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines and circulated for public review from September 28, 2005 through October
28, 2005.
G. On November 16, 2005, and again on January 5, 2006, the Planning
Commission considered the Project at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-01
recommending that the City Council certify the Final Environmental Impact Report for
the Project and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
I. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 06-04, recommending approval of the Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463).
J. On January 24, 2006, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing
as prescribed by law on the Final Environmental Impact Report at which time all
persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the Final
Environmental Impact Report.
K. On January 24, 2006, following consideration of the entire record of
information received at the public hearings before the Planning Commission and the
City Council and due consideration of the Project, the City Council adopted Resolution
No. 06-05, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA04-0462 (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT) PA05-0302 (ZONE CHANGE), PA04-0463 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN) AND PA04-0571 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP)
AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING
CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY CONSISTING OF
APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF MARGARITA ROAD,
KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO(S). 959-080-001 THROUGH 959-080-004
AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462, PA05-0302, PA04-0463,
PA04-0571 )."
.
L. On January 24, 2006, the City Council considered the Conditional Use
Permit and Development Plan for the Project (PA04-0463) at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to, and did testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
M. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 06-07, approving the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for
the Project (PA04-0463).
N. On February 24, 2006, the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic each filed a separate petition challenging the City of
Temecula's approval of the Temecula Regional Hospital project proposed by Universal
Health Services, Inc.
O. On May 3, 2007, the Riverside County Superior Court ordered that the
City of Temecula set aside its approval of the Project, including without limitation, its
certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report and all related approvals and
permits, until the City of Temecula has taken the actions necessary to bring the Project
into compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Riverside
County Superior Court ruled in favor of the California Nurses Association and Citizens
Against Noise and Traffic, holding that: (1) the MTBE plume was not properly analyzed
in the Final Environmental Impact Report; (2) the siren noise at the hospital was
significant and should have been mitigated; and (3) not all feasible traffic mitigation
measures were adopted for cumulative traffic impacts.
P. The Riverside County Superior Court also held that the Final
Environmental Impact Report properly addressed: (1) cumulative noise, light and glare,
and aesthetic impacts; (2) landscaping mitigation deferral; (3) biological resources;
(4) geology and soils mitigation; and (5) land use consistency.
Q. On July 12, 2007, another scoping session was held to determine the
extent of issues to be addressed in the new Environmental Impact Report for the
Project.
R. In response to the Riverside County Superior Court's decision, a new
Draft Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines and
circulated for public review from November 5,2007 through December 5,2007.
S. On January 9, 2008, the Planning Commission considered Planning
Application Numbers PA07-0198 (General Plan Amendment), PA07-0199 (Zone
Change), PA07-0202 (Conditional Use Permits), PA07-0200 (Development Plan),
PA07-0201 (Tentative Parcel Map) in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code, which applications are hereby incorporated by
reference, for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on
the north side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road,
.
known as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-
007through 959-080-010 ("Project"), at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did
testify either in support of or opposition to this matter.
T. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-01 recommending
that the City Council certify the new Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project
and approve a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project.
U. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-04, recommending approval of the
Development Plan (PA07-0200).
V. On January 22, 2008, the City Council rescinded and invalidated its
approvals of Planning Application Nos. PA04-0462, General Plan Amendment; PA05-
0302, Zone Change to PDO-9 (Planned Development Overlay-9); PA04-0463,
Conditional Use Permit and Developrnent Plan; and PA04-0571, Tentative Parcel Map
for the property consisting of approximately 35.31 acres generally located on the north
side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as
Assessors Parcel No(s). 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007 through
959-080-01 O.
W. On January 22, 2008, the City Council considered the Development Plan
(PA07-0200) at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the
City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support
or opposition to this matter.
X. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and due
consideration of the proposed Project, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08-
, entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
PREPARED FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA07-0198 (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT), PA07-0199 (ZONE CHANGE), PA07-0202 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS), PA07-0200 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN), PA07-0201 (TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP) AND RELATED ACTIONS, AND ADOPTING THE FINDINGS PURSUANT TO
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND A MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE PROPERTY
CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 35.31 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH, APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET WEST OF
MARGARITA ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 959-080-001
THROUGH 959-080-004 AND 959-080-007 THROUGH 959-080-010 (PA04-0462,
PA05-0302, PA04-0463, PA04-0571 )." The new Final Environmental Impact Report
.
(FEIR) and mitigation monitoring reporting program accurately addresses the impacts
associated with the adoption of this Resolution.
Y. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further FindinQs. The City Council hereby makes the following
findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the City of Temecula Municipal Code for
a development plan:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of
Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of
the City. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals and policies in the General
Plan for the City of Temecula, the Development Code and with all applicable
requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City of Temecula because the
project has been reviewed and as designed and conditioned, it has been determined
that the project is consistent with all applicable zoning ordinances, state law and the
General Plan.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public, health, safety and general welfare. The overall development of the land has
been designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare,
because the project has been designed to minimize any adverse impacts upon the
surrounding neighborhood and the project has been reviewed and conditioned to
comply with the uniform building and fire codes.
Section 3. Conditional Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby approves the Development Plan to construct 408,160 square foot hospital, a
helipad, two medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a 10,000 square foot
cancer center and an 8,000 square foot fitness rehabilitation center all totaling
approximately 566,160 square feet on 35.31 acres, located on the north side of
Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of Margarita Road, known as
Assessors Parcel Numbers 959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007
through 959-080-010 as set forth in Application No. PA07 -0200, subject to the specific
Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference as though set forth in full.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 2008
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify
that Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 22nd day of January, 2008 by the
following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SCANNED:
G DRIVE:
PERMITS PLUS:
INITIALS:
PLANNER: Papp
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
1
.
~ ~
<J~b 1989 ~~
'1h oO~
ONS.NEWOV'
ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I, (print name) understand that Planning Application No. PA07-0200 has been
approved with Conditions of Approval which are set forth in Exhibit A. I have read the
Conditions of Approval contained in CC Resolution No. 08- and understand them.
Through signing this ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, I agree and
commit to the City of Temecula that I will implement and abide by the Conditions of
Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions.
SIGNA TURE
DATE
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA~DP.doc
2
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA07-0200
Project Description:
A Development Plan to construct a 320-bed hospital
facility, approximately 408,160 square feet in size, two
medical office buildings totaling 140,000 square feet, a
10,000 square foot cancer center and an 8,000 square
foot fitness rehabilitation center, all totaling
approximately 566,160 square feet, located on the north
side of Highway 79 South, approximately 700 feet west of
Margarita Road
Assessor's Parcel No.
959-080-001 through 959-080-004 and 959-080-007
through 959-080-010
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Commercial
Office
Service Commercial/Office
Approval Date:
Determined by City Council Action
Expiration Date:
Determined by City Council Action
WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT
Planning Department
1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Six
Hundred Seventy Dollars and seventy-five cents ($2,670.75) which includes the Two
Thousand Six Hundred Six Dollar and seventy-five cents ($2,606.75) fee, required by Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the
Environmental Impact Report required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and
California Code of Regulations Section 15904. If within said 48-hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document
that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an
original signature to the Planning Department.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
3
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
4
.
Planning Department
3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to
indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the
City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly,
from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions
approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be
deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal
counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any
claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate
fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the
City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of
this project.
5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become
null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by
this approval within the two-year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion,
or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of
time, one year at a time.
7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
8. Prior to the approval and issuance of any permanent signs, a sign program shall be
submitted for review and approval for the project site.
9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and
elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to
bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued
maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any
successors in interest.
11. The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Ptanning\COA~DP.doc
5
.
13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed
satisfied by staffs' prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment,
finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required
by the Condition of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which
case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal,
the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Color
Stucco Color NO.1:
Stucco Color NO.2:
Tile Base:
Aluminum Panel:
Ceramic Roof Tile:
Tinted Glass:
Window Frame:
Senergy, Parchment, # 342
Senergy, Walden, # 3104
Daltile, 12" x 12" Continental Slate, Indian Red CS51
Centria, 9910 L T Seawolf
Monier Lifetile, Terra Cotta Flashed
Viracon, Bronze VE 4-2M
Kawneer, Medium Bronze Kynar 500 Fluorocarbon
14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These
shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
15. The Condition of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials,
equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied
by staff prior to approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish,
technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the
Condition of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the
real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the
decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
16. All utilities shall be screened from view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and
label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. A three foot clear zone shall be
provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Utilities shall be grouped together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities
shall not look like an after-thought. Planting beds shall be designed around utilities. All light
poles shall be located on the landscape plans and the applicant shall insure that there are
no conflicts with trees.
17. The applicant shall insure that mature plantings will not intertere with utilities, adjacent site
existing structures and landscaping and traffic sight lines.
18. All requirements of Development Code Chapter 17.32 (Water Efficient Landscape Design)
are required to be met.
19. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project as
attached.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
6
Police Department
20. Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building shall be removed or painted over
within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police Department
immediately so a report can be taken.
21. Crime Prevention: Any business desiring a business security survey of their location can
contact the crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department.
22. Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building should be
placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to
deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior
of the building.
23. Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at a
height of no more than three feet or below the ground fioor windowsills. Plants, hedges and
shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the
building utilizing lower level windows.
a. The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
24. Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and
minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting
Requirements.
25. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above. The doors
shall be illuminated with a minimum one foot candle of light at ground level, evenly
dispersed.
Building Department
26. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
27. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-
90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays
Community Services Department
28. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
7
.
29. All trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as a
regular solid waste container.
30. The property owner or private maintenance association shall maintain all parkways,
perimeter landscaping, trail, walls, fences and on site lighting.
31. The developer shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
Fire Prevention
32. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by
the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
33. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land
division per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 4 - hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection
measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A).
34.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The
required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system (CFC 903.2,
903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
.
35. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a
case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii.
36. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). This will include all internal
roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must
be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate
map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
Public Works Department
37. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work
and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way.
38. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
8
-
39. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
40. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or
property owner.
41. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground.
42. The driveway on De Portola Road will be restricted to right-in/right-ouVleft-in movements.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07.0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
9
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
10
.
Planning Department
43. The applicant shall submit seven complete sets of final approved plans to the Planning
Department with the following revisions shown on the plans. Planning staff will stamp these
plans as approved for distribution to each department and the applicant.
44. The Landscape plan shall be revised as follows:
a. The applicant shall provide a vines on the screening wall at the loading dock area,
subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
b. The landscape plan shall provide shrubs, vines and/or other acceptable screening
methods to screen the oxygen storage container in the loading dock area, subject to
the approval of the Planning Director.
c. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show final color and finish details
for all decorative hardscape throughout the project site. Decorative hardscape shall
be provided at all primary building entrances and outdoor gathering areas (including
the hospital, medical office buildings, cancer center and fitness rehabilitation center).
d. A minimum of one broad canopy type tree shall be provided per every four parking
spaces. The tree shall be provided in close proximity to the parking spaces it is to
shade.
e. One landscape finger shall be provided per 10 parking spaces. The interior finger
planting width shall be a minimum of five feet wide with the length equal to the
adjoining parking space. Curbs and concrete walks shall not infringe on this five
foot width. The planter shall contain a minimum of one tree with surrounding
groundcover or shrubs or both. The grading plans shall be revised as necessary to
reflect this requirement.
45. The elevations for all buildings shall be revised in a manner that all exterior ladders are
screened from the public view of Highway 79 South.
46. The applicant shall submit a separate plan, entitled outdoor furniture detail plan, showing
details of all outdoor furniture, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Outdoor
furniture shall be decorative and of high quality appearance.
47. The applicant shall provide a detailed elevation drawing of the water and boulderfeature at
the main entrance, near the porte-cochere. Said feature shall be subject to the approval of
the Director of Planning.
48. The applicant shall submit cross section verifying that all roof mounted equipment will be
screened from public view as determined acceptable by the Director of Planning.
49. The elevations and roof plans shall show internalized downspouts for all buildings and
structures, excluding trash enclosures.
50. Trash enclosures shall be shown on the site plan, landscape plan and elevations and shall
comply with the following:
a. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
b. All trash enclosures shall blend with the architecture of the overall center and
include a decorative roof type feature as approved by the Director of Planning.
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DPIPlanningICOA-DP.doc
11
.
c. Trash enclosures shall be screened from view. The applicant shall provide shrubs
and wall vines on three sides of enclosures as required to provide screening.
51. The elevations shall be revised to show decorative lighting fixtures at the primary entry of
each building/structure, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. Details of all
light fixtures, including decorative entry lighting and wall mounted lighting shall be provided
on the plans.
52. The Applicant shall revise the site plan and provide a detailed elevation drawing to show a
decorative fence no less than four feet in height around the helipad, subject to the approval
of the Pianning Director. Said fence shall be constructed in a manner that deflects
horizontal wind velocities caused by the rotation of rotor blades, providing all FAR Part 77
imaginary surfaces and the surface of the area remain obstruction free, per Section
1710.020.P of the City of Temecula Development Code.
53. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical
plans for verification of proper placement oftransformer(s) and double detector check prior
to final agreement with the utility companies.
54. Doubie detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project
site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by
the Director of Planning.
55. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts
or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological
resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and
the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to
immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the
property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to
consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no
cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the
property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon
determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of
Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take
place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the
Director of Planning."
56. CR-1 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer is required to enter into a
Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will
address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be
impacted as a result of the development of the Project, as well as provisions for tribal
monitors.
57. CR-2 If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent
discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and
representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to
investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA.DP,doc
12
.
58. CR-3 A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop
and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated
monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property.
59. CR-4 Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading,
excavation and ground breaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and
studies, to be compensated by the developer.
60. CR-5 The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all
archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper
treatment and disposition.
61. CR-6 All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.
62. A qualified paleontologist/archaeologist shall be chosen by the developer for consultation
and comment on the proposed grading with respect to potential paleontological!
archaeological impacts. A meeting between the paleontologist/ archaeologist, Planning
Department staff, and grading contractor prior to the commencement of grading operations
and the excavation shall be arranged. The paleontologist/archaeologist or representative
shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow
recovery of fossils. The applicant shall provide written verification that services for on-site
professional archaeological and paleontological monitoring has been contracted during all
phases of earthmoving activities.
63. The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be contacted to afford the Band an opportunity
to monitor ground-disturbing activities and participate in the decisions regarding collection
and curation of any such resources. The applicant shall submit correspondence to the
Planning Department that confirms that such contact has been made prior to the issuance
of a grading permit.
64. The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction agreement/treatment plan with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, prior to the issuance of grading permits, that sets forth
and contains the terms and conditions for the treatment of discoveries of Native American
cultural resources. The agreement/treatment plan shall contain provisions for the treatment
of all Native American cultural items, artifacts, and human remains that may be uncovered
during the project. The agreement/treatment plan may allow for the presence of Pechanga
tribal monitors during any ground-disturbing activities. The applicant shall submit a signed
copy of the pre-construction agreement/treatment plan to the Planning Department prior to
the issuance of a grading permit.
65. The Applicant and!or landowner agrees to relinquish all cultural resources, including all
archeological artifacts, that are found on the Project area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians for proper treatment and disposition. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the
grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit.
66. Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified archaeological monitor will be present
and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate the
significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. This mitigation
measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior to issuance of a grading permit.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA.DP,doc
13
.
67. If any human remains are encountered on the project site, all ground disturbing activities in
the vicinity of the discovery will be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's office
and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians will be contacted to arrange for the treatment of
such remains. This mitigation measure shall be placed on the grading plan as a note prior
to issuance of a grading permit.
68. The applicant must enter into a written pre-excavation agreement with the Pechanga Band
of Luiseno Indians that addresses the treatment and disposition of all cultural resources,
human resources and human remains discovered on-site. A copy of the signed document
shall be submitted to the Planning Department.
69. The grading plan shall be revised to include the following:
a. Earth berms as required along the northern property lines and along Highway 79
South as discussed in these Conditions of Approval.
b. A note on the plans indicating all areas not proposed for development within 100
days shall be tufted, seeded and irrigated for soil and dust erosion.
c. Show the five-foot landscape dimension for all parking islands, including the 1-foot
concrete landing strip (seven feet total width). One parking island is required per ten
parking spaces.
Public Works Department
70. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydral:Jlic
calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. A permit from
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work within
their right-of-way.
71. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary
erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private
property.
72. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
73. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report
shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
74. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address
special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
75. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and
upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
14
.
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and
identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect
the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream
facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required
improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
76. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-construction
pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-phase measures
shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading,
Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment
Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction
measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's
NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include a combination of structural and
non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs to prevent contaminants from
commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a
storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and
included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to
issuance of a Grading Permit. The project proponent shall also provide proof of a
mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction
BMPs.
77. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
78. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
79. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
80. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-site
work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works.
81. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or
money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If
the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this
property, no new charge needs to be paid.
82. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone X. This
project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may
include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
15
.
Fire Prevention
83. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-
de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for commercial
(CFC 902.2.2.3, CFC 902.2.2.4).
84. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24-foot clear unobstructed
travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible
provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
85. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each
side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road.
86. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches (CFC 902.2.2.1).
87. Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of one hundred and
fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4).
G:\Plannjng\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital OP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
16
.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
17
.
Planning Department
88. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored
architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be
readable on the photographic prints.
89. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not
adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
90. The final construction plans shall include a photometries plan showing foot-candle
illumination in the parking lot, driveways, drive aisles, pedestrian paths of travel and building
entrances. A minimum of one-footcandle illumination shall be maintained throughout the
site and a minimum of two foot-candle illumination shall be provided at primary building
entrances.
91. Final Construction plans shall provide decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided at the
primary entry of each building/structure, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning.
Final construction plans shall provide details of all light fixtures, including decorative entry
lighting, parking lot lighting and wall mounted lighting.
92. The applicant shall submit a detailed lighting plan for the helipad facility.
93. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal).
b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: one
inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for
final planting inspection".
d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an
agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection."
e. One copy of the approved grading plan.
f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative
map.
i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
G:IPlanningI2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DPIPlanningICOA-DP.doc
18
.
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor
who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be
required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two (2) hours without loss of
pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-
head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with
the approved construction landscape plans. The applicanUowner shall contact the
Planning Department to schedule inspections.
94. The final construction landscape plan shall include the following:
a. A calculation indicating the percentage of the site that is to be landscaped shall be
provided on the construction landscape plans. The applicant shall insure that
minimum required code percentages for landscaping are provided to meet the
specific zone requirements.
b. The applicant shall field verify adjacent existing street plantings and coordinate
proposed plantings to be compatible as approved by the Director of Planning.
c. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted
utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
d. Street trees shall be provided along all streets at the rate of one per every 30 feet of
street frontage.
e. Areas proposed for development in another phase occurring not within six months of
the completion of the previous phase shall be temporarily tufted, seeded and
irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. A note on the grading plan and landscape
plan shall be provided.
f. A minimum five foot width planting area shall be provided at the ends of all parking
rows. Curbs and concrete walks shall not infringe on this five foot width. The
planter length shall be equal to the adjoining parking space. The planter shall
contain a rninimum of one tree, shrubs and ground covers.
g. Accent trees (minimum 36-inch box size) shall be installed at entries to parking
areas in order to define the entry and provide a focal point.
h. Indian Tribe, Faurei varieties shall be provided for Crape Myrtle.
i. Additional trees shall be added on the north, east and west sides of building MOB
#2 as approved by the Director of Planning.
j. A combination of large (no less than 24-inch box) Afghan Pines and California
Pepper trees (or other large screen trees) shall be provided along the northern
perimeter of the project to screen off-site views of the development as approved by
the Director of Planning.
k. A landscaped berm shall be provided along the northern property lines adjacent to
the residentially zoned lots and DePortola, with mature (24-inchand 36-inch box)
screen trees to screen the view of the buildings and reduce the amount of glare from
the project site, subject to approval by the Director of Planning. A cross section
shall be provided on grading and landscape plans verifying the buffer area.
G:IPlanningI2007IPA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DPIPlanningICOA-DP.doc
19
.
I. The landscaped area along Highway 79 South shall include a meandering berm with
large shrubs to provide additional screening of the parking lot. The applicant shall
provide a combination of shrub plantings and earth berms that can be maintained at
a minimum height of three feet around all parking areas to screen parking from off-
site views.
m. All areas not designed for buildings, parking, driveways or other useable features
shall be landscaped, unless approved by the Director of Planning. The area along
the eastern property line, adjacent to the access driveway shall be landscaped,
unless it is determined critical habitat not to be disturbed.
95. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show
and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen.
Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like
an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on
plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
96. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to
trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, and hardscape) to match the style of the building
subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
97. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
98. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on
a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals
shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied
over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as
closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
99. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened from public view as determined acceptable
by the Director of Planning.
100. All exterior wall mounted ladders (for all buildings) shall be located in a manner that they are
not visible from Highway 79 South.
Public Works Department
101. Prior to the first building permit, Parcel Map No. 32468 shall be recorded, unless otherwise
approved by the Director of Public Works.
102. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of
Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The following design criteria shall be observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of T emecula Standard No. 207 A.
c. Street lights shall be installed along the publiC streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
20
.
d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Numbers. 400. 401 and 402.
e. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
103. The Developer shall design the following public improvements to City ofTemecula General
Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, drainage facilities,
signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88'
R1W) to include installation of pavement, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and
striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
c. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road) - Provide southbound and
eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap.
d. The traffic signal at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Country Glen Way
shall be modified to allow a full movement intersection.
104. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise
approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets:
a. Dona Lynora (66' R/W) to include the installation of street improvements, paving,
curb and gutter, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Private 28-foot wide ingress/egress road to include installation of paving and curb
per the approved site plan.
105. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works:
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, traffic signal
systems, and other traffic control devices as appropriate
b. Storm drain facilities
c. Sewer and domestic water systems
d. Under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines
106. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of
Public Works. The Traffic Control Plan shall indicate that construction traffic may not use
the entrance from DePortola Road to access the site.
107. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed
by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City
Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through private property.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
21
.
108. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with
the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer
shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
109. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
110. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of
the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08.
In addition to the above Public Works Department Conditions of Approval, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE
FIRST BUILDING PERMIT IN PHASE I - (A 170-bed hospital with 80,000 square feet of
medical office space)
111. Parcel Map No. 32468 shall be recorded, unless otherwise approved by the Director of
Public Works.
112. The Developer shall design the following public improvements to City of Temecula General
Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of the Department of Public Works:
a. Highway 79 South (Urban Arterial Highway Standards - 134' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, underground utilities, drainage facilities, signing
and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
i. Westbound
a) Provide a dedicated right turn lane - 12 foot wide by 200 feet long
b) Provide three (3) thru lanes
c) Provide one (1) left turn lane
ii. Eastbound
a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes
b) Provide two (2) thru lanes and
c) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane
b. Dona Lynora (66' R/W)
i. Installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
ii. Restricted to right in/right out vehicular movement
c. Main entry (Country Glen Way) and Highway 79 South
i. Signal modification
Ii. Provide a 245' continuous median from Highway 79 South to main drive
aisle
G:\Ptanning\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
22
.
iii. Southbound (exiting site)
a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes
b) Provide a 20 foot wide shared thru/right turn lane
iv. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide
d. De Portola Road (Modified Secohdary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W)
i. Installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
ii. Provide a 28 foot wide internal ingress/egress connection to De Portola
Road
e. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road)
i. Provide southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap.
Building Department
The Conditions of Approval herein (Building Department) are not applicable to the projects that fall
under the jurisdiction of the State of California OSHPD. These conditions are applicable to the
construction documents for projects, specifically the medical office buildings that are within the
jurisdiction of the City of Temecula Building and Safety Department.
113. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code 2005 Standards, California Title 24
Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
114. A complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the
regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on
electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting
shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public
rights-of-way.
115. A receipt or clearance letter from the T emecula Valley School District shall be submitted to
the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
116. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction
work.
117. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide
all details on plans (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1. 1998).
118. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
119. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
120. Restroom fixtures. number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
G;\Planning\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
23
.
121. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior
to permit issuance.
122. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic
and mechanical plan for plan review.
123. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer
engineer are required for plan review submittal.
124. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with
disabilities.
125. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Community Services Department
126. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
127. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional street lighting which ever occurs
first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit an approved
Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of arterial
street lighting on Hwy 79 South into the TCSD maintenance program.
Fire Department
128. Prior to building permit or building construction, all locations where structures are to be built
shall have approved Fire Departmeni vehicle access roads. Fire Department access roads
shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2).
129. Prior to issuance of building permits. the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private
water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil
engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to
hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will
be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met
for the on site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit
being issued (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 241-4.1).
130. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Appendix II-A).
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Plannjng\COA~DP.doc
24
.
PRIOR TO RELEASE OF POWER, BUILDING OCCUPANCY OR ANY USE ALLOWED BY
THIS PERMIT
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
25
.
Planning Department
131. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens, should be
prepared upon completion of the steps outlined the initial study, under cultural resources.
The report should include a discussion of the significance of all recovered specimens. The
report and inventory, when submitted to the Lead Agency (City ofTemecula), would signify
completion of the program to mitigate impacts to the palentologic and archaeological
resources.
132. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical
equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final
inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of
building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the
project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered
mansard roof element or other screening if reviewed and approved by the Director of
Planning.
133. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the
approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
134. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction
landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one
year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation
system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the
bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
135. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying
the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square
inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum
height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or
centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground,
or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-
street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously
stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not
displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with
disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000."
136. In addition to the above requirements. the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
137. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be
installed prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
G:\Pfanning\2007\PA07.0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
26
.
138. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed
by this permit.
Public Works Department
PHASE I . A 170-bed hospital with 80,000 square foot medical office space.
139. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy in Phase I, the following improvements shall be
constructed and operational:
a. Highway 79 South
i. Traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Highway 79 South and
Country Glen Way
ii. Roadway improvements
a) Westbound
(i) Provide a dedicated right turn lane - 12 foot wide by 200 feet
long
(ii) Provide three (3) thru lanes
(iii) Provide one(1) left turn lane
b) Eastbound
(i) Provide two (2) left turn lanes
(ii) Provide two (2) thru lanes and
(iii) Provide one (1) shared thru/right lane
b. Main Entry/Country Glen Way
i. Provide a 245' continuous median from Highway 79 South to main drive
aisle
ii. Southbound (exiting site)
a) Provide two (2) left turn lanes
b) Provide a 20-foot wide shared thru/right turn lane
iii. Northbound (entering site) - 28 foot wide
c. De Portola Road (Modified Secondary Arterial (4 lane separated) - 88' R/W)
i. 28-foot wide internal ingress/egress connection from project site to De
Portola Road
ii. Roadway improvements
d. State Route 79/Redhawk Parkway (Margarita Road)
i. Southbound and eastbound right turn traffic signal overlap
e. Dona Lynora (66' R/W)
i. Installation of half-street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer)
ii. Restricted to right in/right out vehicular movement
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
27
.
PHASE II - Expand to a 320-bed hospital plus an additional 60,000 square foot medical office
space.
140. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
141. All public improvements, including traffic signal modification, shall be constructed and
completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of
the Department of Public Works.
142. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall
be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
Building and Safety Department
143. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or Shell Buildings shall provide a house electrical
meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire
alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with Single User Buildings shall
clearly show on the plans the location of a dedicated panel in place for the purpose of the
operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically
proposed.
Fire Prevention
144. Prior to Occupancy and building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall
have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the
facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads
shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness
of .25 feet ( CFC see 902).
145. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers"
shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3).
146. Prior to issuance of Occupancy all manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department
access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with
the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC 902.4).
147. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including
parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI
Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone
VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and
format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecufa Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
28
.
Police Department
148. Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
149. Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be
marked in accordance with section 2251'1.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
G:IPlanning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DPIPlanningICOA-DP.doc
29
-
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\PJanning\COA-DP.doc
30
.
150. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control
District's transmittal dated July 24, 2004, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made
payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or
money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the
District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
151. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside
Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 7, 2007, a copy of which is
attached.
152. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Authority's transmittal dated July 21, 2004, a copy of which is attached.
153. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated July 12,2004, a copy of which is attached.
G;\Planning\2007\PA07~0200 Temecula Regional Hospital DP\Planning\COA-DP.doc
31
-
yy rU'\.1\.r.l" JJ. 'tV lLJ.,U"UV1"
Oenen! Managcr-chiefEnginccr
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVBRSIDB, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
RIVERSIDE coUNtY FLOOD CO
AND WATER CONSERV AnON DIS
SlIBD.!
C!IY ofTemecula
Planning DeDartment
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula. Califomla 92589-9033
AllenlJo~: ~ \...otJEt
Ladles and GenUemen: Re: ~-C>"c..'l. J:.. p,e.. 0'1--00.1<.3
The D1slIicl does not normaRY recommend conditions for land dlvIslons or other land use cases In Inco~rated
.cItles. The Dislrlct also does ~an check c;l\y land use cases, or provide Stale Division or Real Estate letters or
other ftood hazard reoorts for cases. DIslilct commentslrec:iomri1endalfons for' such cases era nonnally limited
to Rems of s~ Interest to the DlslIicllndudna OlslIicl Master DraInage Plan facilities, other reglorlal flood
control and dtalnage faclUtles whlch.couId be CllIlSkf'ered a!oglcal COIl1pOI1enfor exlOnslon of a master plan system,
and DIs1ricl Area Drainage Plan fees (development mltlgatloii fees). Iil adclillon; InfoanaUon of a general nature Is
provided.. ..
The District has not reviewed the ~ project In detail and the follov.i!lll checked comments do not In any way
constitute or Imply DIstrlct apprbVa! or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard. public
health and safetY.or any other such Issue: .
. ThIs PT9lect WOUld not be ImpaCted by Dlslrlct Master Drainage Plan facillUes nor are other facilities of
reglonal,nterest proposed. . .
-X- ThIs project Involves District Master Plan faaliUes. The Distrlct wfn accept ownership or such facilities on
wrlllen request of the Qily. Facilities must be constructed 10 DlslIicl standards, and District Dlan check, and
in~on wlIi be required for Distrlct acceptance. Plan check, Inspection end administratlve fees will be
required. ". .
ThIs Pl'O/ect Pfl1pOses channels, storm drains 36 inches or !!VIler in diameter. or other facilities that could be
considered regiOnal In nature aildfor a 10lIIca1 extension of thli ~
Master Dralna~ Plan. The DIstrlct woulii consider acceptfpg ownership Of sucn feallties on wntlen request
of the q/ty. Facintfes must be conslructed to Dlsbicl atancIliids, and Dlslrlct Plan check and InsP!lCllon will
be reqUired for District acceptance. Plan check, Inspection and administrative fees wfll be required.
This pro~ Is located within the limits or the DIslrlct's . Area
g,~~g~ ~~e~orord~~r:r~ ~h~e:BI=,~i"alfJI=~~t':.~J~gDe..t:~d?l!l ~~s
whichever comes firsl Fees to be paJd should be at the rate In effect at the time of 1Ssuai1ce ot ll1e.actuaJ
pennlt. .
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may regulraa NaUonal Pollutant, Discharge EfJmInaUon System (NPDESl J1IlIll)it from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for .gradlng, recOrdaUon, or other final !lPProval Should not be given until the
'City has detennlned tllat.thlj project has been granted a pennll,er Is'llhown to be exempt .
It this ProIect Involves a Federal ~ Management ~ncy (FEMAl Il1lIflP.ed l\ood plain, then the City should
requlni .!lie applicant to P!'OVIde all stud.!~ ClIlCUIatlons, jJ!ans 8nd' other IrifoanaUon re~Ir'ed to meel FEMA
requirements, 8nd should further require """ the apP!lC!lril Obtain a Conditional Leller of Mi!P Revision {CLOMR)
prior tograd,ng, recordetion or olhe~ final approvaf of the project, and a Leiter or Map Revision (lOMR) prior to
occupancy. .
If a nalural watercourse or mapped flood plain 18 ImD8Cled !>Y this project. the City should requlre the applicant to
obtain a SectIon 1601/1603 Agreement fnim the Callfomla Departmerit or Ash arid Game and a Clean Water Act
5eclIon 404 Pennlt from the U.S. Army ColpS of En~, or written cocres~ from lhesa agencies
indlcating the proJect Is exemPl from these ~Is. A Cleen Water Act SectiofI 401 Water Quality CeIliflcetion
may be required Trom the loCal Calltomla Re9fonal Water Quality Control Board prlor to Issuance of lhe Corps 404
pennll.
X /ftJ ~!:.Jr 1'l>l4.\IT' 5rt.ft1,L. lit:
tlVi,MtJe:t> fttl.. kJo( W""!'- wl"TlfiI'J r~
])\$~ C.r \4q"" -W-.,Jff1 'p..- w rrtt
C>16lr1Z\ Go. FAq l..l11 '"".
"f'e:~e.I^,,,,,, ("r~- ~"
~@~OW~m1
JUl 2 8 2004 W
..
.
c:.....t.A
Very lIuIy youra,
tU;4
ARl1JRODIAZ
Senior CIvIl Engineer
Date: ,7U/Y..21:Jtl!'J,{
.
.
.....0:. .
,~
~~
i.
j
I
I
,
;
i
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
,
I
1
i
I
i
I
I
i
I
I
J.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE · COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
July 7, 2004
m~ ~. ~ n \'J i~ ~
l\ill JC:"" II ,~04 ~
City ofTemecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Dan Long
By
RE: Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA044I63
Dear Mr. Long:
Department'of Environment8I Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0462 & PA044163 to
construct T emecula Regional Hospital and has no objections. Water arid sewer services should be
available in this area, although we have not iti receipt of any information concerning those services.
. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE
REQUIRED:
a) "WiII-serve"letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
b) Any food establishments, (including vending machines), shall require three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Unifonn Retai1 Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility Plan Examinm at (909) 600-6330.
c) Any hazardous lnaterlaIs handling or stomge shall require a clearance letter from the
Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (9SS-
SOSS)
Sincerely,
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Hca1tb SpeclaIlst
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for fina1 Department ofEnv1ronmentaJ Health clearance.
co: . Doug ThompsOn, Hazardous MateriaIs
:Oce1 EalOIcemnt AgeDCJ . P'Q Box 1280, 1llve1side, CA 92502.1280 . (909) !/55.8982 . FAX 1909) 781.9653 . 4OBO Lemon Slreet, 9th.~ !five,.;de, CA 92501
.:..... Uoe .... Walei' fDsIa-. . P.Q Box 1206. 1lIwnIdo, CA 92502.1206 . (909) 9~ . FAX 1909l ~ . 4OBO lemon SlJeet, 2nd Floor, RIvetside. CA 92501
1
.
:.., '.
J ,
, .
1
I
,
I.
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
i
I
I
;.
....-
','
'-
-
· ~ r ~
July 21, 2004
R1v....kIe Transit Agency
1825 Third S_t
P.O. Box 59968
RlveBIde. CA 92517-1968'
Phone: (909) 56&SOOO
Fax: (909) 561>6001
Mr. Dan Long, Case Planner
Planning Depl, City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT: P04.()462 and PA0400463 - Temecula Hospltal- Comments from RTA
Dear Mr: long:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the site plan for the proposed 535,000 sq ft medical
complex at Temecula Hospital along State Route (SR) 79. A copy of RTA Planning's Intemal
Development Review Memo Is enclosed and provides additional ralionale and technical detail in
support of the requests for transit amenities that would expand mobility options for this project.
To encourage and enhance future transit options at TemeClila Hospital, RTA recommends the
site pian or street improvement plans be revised at to show the following features:
· A paved, lighted, and ADA-compllant .translt bus stop with a 220 ft-fong tumout conflgura-
. tion capable of accommodating two parked buses, to be Installed along the N side of SR
79, just west of the primary hospital entrance. The bus stop should Incorporate a paved
passenger waiting area and space for Installation of benches and passenger shelters.
.. Information note: Sufficient right-of-way appears available for this tumout without
significant adjustment to sidewalks, loss of parking spaces or required landscaping and
with minimum disturbance of future street trae or utility structure Installations.
· RrA siaff is also recommending designation on the plans of an additional specified clear
path of travel from the bus stop to the entrance of the main hospital building.
· RTA staff also 'adVises that the project proponents work with the City to Installlwo new
passenger shelters at the new bus Slop that are corilpllmenlary to the hospital's design
and architectural themes.
RTA requests Ihese recommendations be made conditions of approval for PA 04-0462 and
PA04-0463. If you need further clarification or I can be of further assistance, please call me at
(909) 565-5164 or conlact me onUne at mmccov/lilriversldetransilcom.
Michael McCoy
Senior Planner
F:\dataIPlamfnglMfkeM\WordlDev Review\Temecula\2004\RTA LUhd . Temec Hosp.doc
-
.' .
.....
'-:RrA
III....w. n../I JIg-.,
July 21, 2004
PLANNING DEPARTMENT MEMO
DEVELOPMENT~~
To:
Anne Palatino, Director of Planning
Michael McCoy, Senior Planner ~
City of Temecula, Cases PA0400462 & -4)463: Plot Plan review and' CUP for
535,000 sq ft of hospilal and medlcak'elated facilities, N of State Route (SR) 79
and W of Margarita Rd; RIverside Transit Agency (RTA) Comments .
Bus routes inwlved: Exlsllng Route 24 and future bus routes
From:
Subject:
Summary: UnIversal Health Care ServIces Inc proposes a site plan and conditional use
pennlt for the Temecula Hospital project. 535,000 sq ft of medical facilities located on 35
now vacant acres % mile west of the SR79-Margar/ta Rd Intersection In a rapIdly expanding
commercIal district of Temecula. This will be the first fulJ.faclllty medical Institution In
Southwest RIverside County and will be a distinct asset to the community, challenging
planners and engineers to provide II robust suite of mobility options for access to It The
project Includes the following components:
.
· 176-bed, 6-story hospital building, Including Emergency admittance
. A 5-story expansion of the hospital
· Two multl-story medIcal office buildings
. Cancer center
· Fitness center
· 1280 parking spaces
The sIte plan's per/meter ahd Inter/or circulation patterns are very good, with prImary
access provided dlreCtry off a signalized Intersection at SR 79 and Country Glen Wy. The
hospital's main building entrance will have a covered drlve-thru loop suitable for van.
pools, paratranslt and most private vehIcles. Several ADA paths-of-travel are specified
on the s~e plan for connection between the main hospital and all perimeter driveways.
RTA oPerates Route 24 along some portions ofSR79 but the bus currently does not stop
at this site. RT A Is currently studying a general reconfiguratlon. of bus routes In South-
.west RIverside County and anticipates additional bus service along SR79 and Margarita
Rd In the relatively near future since It Is an Important. arterial that would serve many
commercial generators of bus traffic.
In considering what transit amenities would be appropriate for the Temecula HospItal
site, RTA staff looked at other comparable hospItals In the Inland Counties. In some
Cases, such as Route 17, the hospital Is Important enough to be the route tennlnus or
name of the line as identIfied on the bus Itself. Also, several distinct transit routes often
serve a sing III large hC?spltal, as listed on the next page.
It was found that In general, buses would come onto the site, close to the main building, .
to drop off and pick up passengers If the facility was publicly owned, such as RIverside
F:ldatalPlannlnglMlkeMlWordIOev RevIew\Temecula\2004\TemeculaHosp.doc
.
.
'.
I.
i
,
,
,
I
I
:.
I
,
,
i
i
j
,
,.
I
I
I
I
!.
I
,
I
I
I
;.
:. ~
County General Medical Center In Moreno Valley. For privately owned hospitals, like
Kaiser or San Gorgonlo, the transit stop was always off the property along a nearby
street. Some examples of transit service and stops are:
-Kaiser Hosplfalln Riverside: 2 lines, with transit stops along Magnolia having
multiple turnouts, benches and shelters, etc;
- Loma Unda Hospital: 3 lines, with transit stops at several locations on perimeter
of complex and other nearby medical facilities such as the Veterans Hospital;
- Riverside General: 3 lines, with transit center and bus turn-around on site, very
close and convenient to main building;
- Riverside Community: 2 lines, bus stops along Magnolia, off the property;
- Corona Regional Med ctr: 2 lines; bus stops along S Main St, off the property;
- St. BernardIne Med Ctr: 3 lines, multiple bus stops along various perimeter sts
Smaller hospitals such as Menifee Valley Med Ctr or the Inland Valley Regional Medical
ctr are not expected to be comparable to the planned Temecula facility upon Its full
bulld-out. RT A staff believes Riverside's Kaiser Hospital bus stop configuration would
. be most comparable with the future needs of the proposed Temecula facility, since the
former also has several medical towers, doctor offices and a similar perimeter access
road network. No on-site access for regular transit buses Is anticipated at either site.
To ensure safety and convenience' of future transit operations at the Temecula Hospital,
RTA Is respectfully request/ng the site plan or ass~ated street engineering plans be
amended to Include a two or three-bay bus stop and bus turnout located at:
- North side of State Highway 79, on the far side (west of) the proposed signalized
Intersection with Country Glen Wy and the primary hospital entrance. The stop's
taper, or entrance area, should begin no closer than 50 feet from the end of the
Intersect/on's radius and extend for no less than 220 ft to accommodate two parked
buses. The exact position would depend on location of utility structures, commer-
cial signs, street lighting, key landscaping and other factors. The minimum depth
(I.e. width) of the turnout Is 10 ft, however this may be reduced to 5 ft If a designa-
ted, striped bike path Is Installed along this port/on of State Highway 79.
- Additionally, RTA requests the site plan specify another clear path of travel from the
main building going directly out to the requested bus stop location.
- RTA staff also requests that the project proponents consider Investing In some'
additional architectural amenities for the bus stop,lts benches and shelters by
perhaps taking this opportunity to make a positive visual statement at this site In
the. Interests of maintaining the community Image of Temecula. Because this
facility will be one of the most well-known and visited places In the city, Its bus stop
Is deserving of a hlgh-quallty bench and shelter that are visually compatible and
complimentary to the main building architectural theme. ~e applicant's architect
or engineers are urged to contact RTA staff for further details.
RT A staff will request the mUltl-bay bus turnout and the path of travel discussed abo.ve
be made conditions of approval for Cases 04-0462 and 0400463. RTA staff will work with
future dev\1lopers of the eastbound bus stop site (across SR 79) to ensure It Is
comparable and compatible with the stop In front of the Hospital.
INITIAL REVIEW INFORMATION - Review completed date: July 21,2004.
F:ldalalPlann/ngIMlkeMlWord\Oev Review\Temeculal2OO4\TemeculaHosp.doc
.
@
IaDchD
Water
&ard ~D1ndori
JohD.E.BoqIucI
..........
CAhP.Ko
Br.Vb~
_J........
..... B.DaJq
_B.1lnb
u... D. Rum.u:a
JohD.V.RoaI
"",-,
Ilrlu J.IIn""
GaoonI_
PbIIUp 1..1'0....
Dinctorot~'L'nulzrer
E.P. "Bob" Lazavu
-..."".,.......
PG'lYB. I.mack
"-"'"
.....M._
Diotrid_.-.-""
--
0. MIchael eo",*
a...t BoIIt,. KrIep;r UP
.......,""""""
"
July 12, 2004
SUBJECT:
9:~;:)
,,// .
I./,'
17~~' ~
v". ~-"
17' r
#/. .1'~
~.J> ~
W@ O'?
~~
WATER AVAILABILITY, TEME GIONALHOSPITAL;
PARCELS NO.1, NO.2, AND NO.3 OF PARCEL MAP 13043;
PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP 6813; AND PARCELS NO.1, NO. 2,
NO.3, AND NO.4 OF PARCEL MAP 13734; APN 959-080-001
THROUGH APN 959-080-004, AND APN 959-080-007 THROUGH
APN 959-080-010; PA04-0462 AND PA04-0463
Dan Long, Project Planner'
City of Temecula
Planning Department
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 - 9033
Dear Mr. Long:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
bound3ries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-
site water facilities and the completion of financial ammgements between RCWD
and the property owner.
If fire protection is required; the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and
requirements. Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner
signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
All on-site public water facilities will require public utility easements in favor of
RCWD. The project proposes to relocate RCWD's 12-inch discharge pipeline
and the associated easement from RCWD Well No. 120. This pipeline must be
contained within a minimum 2O-foot-wide easement, which is located such that
no permanent structures or trees are located within its boundaries. The projeCt
proponent should s<<hedule a meeting with RCWD to confirm and detail these
req~ments.
If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative
at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICI'
'lrJ.:/ t7t;
~c~e;erpe;er,p
Development Engineering
04\MM,m<Otll)R:P .
c: Lauric Williams, Engineering Services Supecvisor
Bud Iones. F.ngi-nng Project Coordinator
.
IIaad10 CaIIIanIIa Water Dbtdd
421S5~a-I . PcOf!bBez.SI01T . T-a.c.us.m.925B9-1iKl11 . (909):I:Il6.4l900.PAX(~)296-6S60