Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
031008 OTLRB Agenda
' In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting(28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title Ili i AGENDA A REGULAR MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL REVIEW BOARD MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE March 10, 2008—9:00 a.m. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Board Members: Blair, Eden, Harker,Williams and Chairman Moore PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board on items that are listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a green "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Board Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Board Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matter listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless member of the Local Review Board request specific items to be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 11, 2008 R:\Old Town\Agendas\2008\03-10-08 Agenda.doc 1 BOARD BUSINESS 2 Planning Application Nos PA07-0302 and PA07-0303 a Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness to allow for operation of a for-profit museum with associate museum gift shoo within the historic Arviso House located at 28673 Puiol Street Applicant: Otto and Nancy Baron 28681 Pujol Street Temecula, CA 92590 Staff: Betsy Lowrey 3 Application No PA07-0265 a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Shop complex located at 28464 Old Town Front Street Applicant: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 Staff: Dana Schuma DIRECTOR OF PLANNING REPORT DIRECTOR OF REDEVELOPMENT REPORT CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT Code Enforcement Actions in Old Town BOARD MEMBER REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: April 14, 2008 9:00 a.m., Main Conference Room, City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 R:\Old Town\Agendas\2008\03-10-08 Agenda.doc - 2 ITEM #1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE OLD TOWN TEMECULA LOCAL REVIEW BOARD FEBRUARY 11, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The Old Town Temecula Local Review Board convened in a regular meeting at 9:00 a.m., on Monday, February 11, 2008, in the Main Conference Room, of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL Present: Board Members: Blair, Eden, Harker, Williams, and Chairperson Moore. Absent: None. Also Present: Director of Planning Ubnoske Management Analyst Watson Development Processing Coordinator Noland Minute Clerk Childs Senior Planner Fisk Director of Redevelopment Meyer PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments at this time. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Approve the Minutes of January 14, 2008. MOTION: Board Member Harker moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Board Member Blair seconded the motion and voice vote reflected-unanimous approval. RA01d Town\Minutes\2008\021108.doc 1 BOARD BUSINESS 2 Discussion of the Old Town Visioning Project recommendations. Planning Application No. PA06-0337 Senior Planner Fisk, by way of PowerPoint Presentation, highlighted on the following aspects of staffs report: • Background • Project Description o Historic Core—Preserve and respect historic buildings o Streets — Enhance the historic character and pedestrian friendly nature of the streets. Protect the historic grid of streets and alleys o Building Heights — Permit up to four-story buildings, subject to detail and design standards. Allow trailer structures with a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) o Architecture — Future buildings should respect the historic architectural styles in Old Town and contribute to a well-defined,, lively and pedestrian-oriented streetscape o Murrieta Creek Walk— Improve the visual and functional connection between Old Town and Murrieta Creek o Infrastructure — Improve infrastructure for future development, including water, sewer, power, communications, trash and deliveries. Maximize the use of alleys to locate these services and utilities off street o Residential Neighborhoods — Encourage the development of high quality residential neighborhoods to support the commercial and office core of Old Town o Parking — Retain existing Specific Plan parking standards both near and long term o Economic Development — Ensure that future growth in Old Town meets the needs of its businesses and residents, and that the growth is economically sustainable Principal Planner Richardson advised that the Old Town parking survey was re-surveyed,in February 2007; that an interim parking strategy will be developed to address special event parking needs; and that a comprehensive parking strategy will be developed to increase parking supply for long term parking. In response to Board Member Blair's query, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that staff is currently working on a multi-family project for Old Town. I Senior Planner Fisk explained "Poem Based Code" tothe Old Town Local Review Board. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that a training session with respect to "Form Based Code" could be implemented prior to finalizing the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). Board Member Moore suggested that in order to preserve historic buildings, perhaps the City could purchase property that could house historic buildings in a park setting, providing retail and commercial opportunities for the public. Principal Planner Richardson advised that an underground parking structure in Old Town would not be viable for the City to construct. R:\Old Town\Minutes\2008\021108.doc 2 Principal Planner Richardson noted that although the approved Civic Center will equip three functioning levels, it will give an appearance of a taller building. Board Member Moore relayed that it would be her opinion that a bank should be removed from the list of allowable uses in the Old Town Specific Plan. Senior Planner Fisk explained the "Park Once" strategy plan. The Old Town Local Review Board relayed their opposition with parking meters in Old Town. Board Member Moore noted on the importance of ADA access and railing throughout the Old Town area. Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she will make the following changes to staffs report: • Add language to Recommendation 4: Architecture will be added that new buildings be compatible with existing buildings • Add language to Recommendation 6: Infrastructure explore opportunities for ADA and railing to new structures Board Member Williams suggested that an emergency call box be installed along the Murrieta Creek Trail Walk. Principal Planner Richardson advised that the proposed recommendation will be forwarded to the Planning Commission at the March 5, 2008 meeting and to City Council on March 25, 2008. It was the consensus of the Old Town Local Review Board to move this project forward. DIRECTOR OF PLANNING REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she will schedule some training with respect to "Form Based Codes." DIRECTOR OF REDEVELOPMENT REPORT Director of Redevelopment Meyer advised that staff is in the process of selecting a development and design process team for the Town Square Market Place. Mr. Meyer also noted that two meetings are being held monthly with respect to the Old Town marketing and promotions plan. CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT A Code Enforcement report was distributed to the Old Town Local Review Board, per agenda packet. BOARD MEMBER REPORT A. Apologizing for his recent absences, Board Member Williams relayed that he had other business matters to address but continues to be committed to the Old Town Local Review Board. B. Board Member Eden also apologized for his recent absences and looks forward to a successful 2008. _.R:\Old Town\Minutes\20081021108.doq 3 C. Board Member Harker queried on the Butterfield Square project. With respect to the aesthetics of the Butterfield Square project, Development Processing Coordinator Noland advised that a design application for this square has not yet been submitted. In response to Board Member Moore's query, Mr. Noland relayed that the Gonzalez Adobe structure would be on the City's Historical list. D. Referencing the cross on The Pujol School House, Board Member Moore stated that she does not recollect the proposal for the cross coming forward to the Old Town Local Review Board for consideration. Addressing Board Member Moore's concern, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she will have staff explore this issue. ADJOURNMENT At 10:40 a.m., Chairperson Moore formally adjourned this meeting to March 10, 2008 Main Conference Room, City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. Chairperson Moore Director of Planning Ubnoske RA01d Town\Minutes\2008\021108.doc 4 ITEM #2 STAFF REPORT—PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD March 10, 2008 PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA07-0302 and PA07-0303 Prepared by: Betsy Lowrey, Junior Planner APPLICATION INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Otto and Nancy Baron 28681 Pujol Street Temecula, CA 92590 PROPOSAL: Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness Applications to allow the operation of a for-profit museum with associated museum gift shop within the historic Arviso House located on .42 acres at 28673 Pujol Street Street within the Old Town Specific Plan area (Arviso House was recently relocated from 41915 Fourth Street). The project includes the existing 1,022 square foot historic Arviso House; and proposes to add a 1,022 square foot basement, a screened porch, and a 205 square foot hospitality cabin. LOCATION: Generally located on the west side of Pujol Street, approximately 200 feet south of Main Street, at 28673 Pujol Street EXISTING ZONING: Old Town Specific Plan: Tourist Retail Core (MDR) SURROUNDING ZONING: North Medium Density Residential (MDR) South: Medium Density Residential (MDR) East: High Density Residential (HDR) West: Specific Plan 8; Industrial Park (IP) GENERALPLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Residential (M) EXISTING LAND USE: The Historic Arviso House has been relocated to the proposed site from 41915 Fourth Street (currently on temporary riser blocks). The property was otherwise vacant except for a 70+ year old shed previously known to be a blacksmith shop SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Residential (single family house) South: Residential (Mr. and Mrs. Baron's personal residence) East: Apartment complex West: Vacant/hillside GAPlanning\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Ranch CUP\Ptaming\OTLRB Staff Report.doc 1. BACKGROUND/PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Historic Arviso House was originally constructed in 1920 by Ventura Arviso as a wood framed residence for his family who were members of the Pechanga Indian Band. Ventura Arviso worked for the Vail Cattle Ranch and together with his wife raised at least four children at this house. The residence stayed within the family until it was purchased in 1996 by the current owner/applicant, Otto and Nancy Baron. Since then, the Barons have remodeled the structure to bring the building in compliance with contemporary building codes in order to allow public access for a retail shop. The applicant has utilized the Arviso House as an antique boutique and period mercantile shop called "Kreigers General Mercantile" since approximately 1999 on the northwest corner of Mercedes and Fourth Street. On May 7, 2007, the Arviso House was moved and relocated to its current location at 28673 Pujol Street, where it remains on temporary riser blocks until approval of this project. The applicants propose a western themed for-profit museum, "Temecula's Heritage Ranch," at this location. On October 30, 2007, the applicant submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness for "Temecula's Heritage Ranch," a for-profit museum. Pursuant to Section III.0 (Land Use Regulations) of the Old Town Specific Plan, a for-profit museum is allowable upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness application is required pursuant to Section V (Finding of Historic Appropriateness) of the Old Town Specific Plan for exterior renovations to a historic structure. Proposed renovations to the Arviso House include a new color palette, the addition of a screened porch, a basement and a hospitality cabin. On November 29, 2007, a Department Review Committee meeting was held at City Hall with the applicant; and a comment letter was sent outlining staffs requested revisions to the site plan. Additionally, staff and the applicant have had several over-the-counter meetings and telephone conferences to move the project forward through the entitlement process. On February 1, 2008, the applicant resubmitted all plans and staff has determined that the project is ready to be heard before the Old Town Local Review Board. ANALYSIS " Site Plan A site plan has been submitted with the Conditional Use Permit application to plot the proposed location of the Arviso House, porch, hospitality cabin, parking, driveway, landscaping and accessibility pathways. The site plan meets the minimum requirements of the development standards for Medium Density Residential (MDR)within the Old Town Specific Plan. Its building lot coverage of 13 percent is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 35 percent. In addition, the landscaping/open space coverage of 78 percent exceeds the minimum 25,percent for MDR zoning. All uses within MDR zoning requires on-site parking consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code and the project meets the required four spaces based upon 1,227 square feet of museum display. An existing, legally nonconforming, shed approximately 70 years old will remain onsite (not for public use). The applicants have agreed, and the project will be conditioned, to ensure the deteriorating condition of the shed is restored to maintain an orderly appearance. GAPlanaing\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Ranch CUP\Planning\OTLRB Staff ReportAx 2 Architecture The existing Arviso House architecture will remain in tact; however, the applicant is proposing an attached screened porch along the southern side towards the rear of the structure. The screened porch will incorporate elements of the main structure, including a matching concrete tile roof (shake style) and complimentary board and baton hardi-plank wood siding along the base. Staff has determined that a porch addition is historically appropriate since the Arviso House previously had a screened porch that was dismantled in the 1990s due to unsafe conditions. A proposal for a 205 square foot"hospitality cabin" (intended for additional museum display) is also planned along the southern side of the Arviso House, directly in front of the proposed screened porch essentially blocking the porch from public view. The hospitality cabin will incorporate design elements of the main structure consistent with western frontier style architecture including a covered front porch with wood braced columns, complementary board and baton wood siding (using hardi-plank for durability) and the same shake-like roofing materials as used on the Arviso House and proposed screened porch. A covered parking canopy with matching roof tiles and wooden columns will extend along the south side of the Hospitality Cabin primarily to display an antique car owned by the applicant. The Old Town Specific Plan, Section IV, indicates that accessory buildings located in residential districts shall incorporate architectural treatments from the main building including siding, surface materials, trim, paint colors and roof materials. However, the applicant is proposing two different color schemes from the Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette to distinguish between the Hospitality Cabin and the Historic Arviso House. Staff recommends that the applicant select either one of the two color schemes to meet the Old Town Specific Plan and to ensure consistency and continuity of the proposed Heritage Ranch. Landscaping All pavement proposed for the driveway, parking area and pedestrian pathways will be decorative beige colored concrete. The existing white split rail fencing will line the entire front of the property connecting with side fencing; and extend along the curve of the driveway providing additional screening of the parking area. The site plan calls out landscaping along the front perimeter of the property and the project be conditioned to provide additionally enhanced drought-resistant landscaping consistent with the landscape guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan to ensure an appealing front yard. Signage Existing The building signage on the Arviso House was previously reviewed and approved by the Old Town Local Review Board on May 9, 2005 allowing "Dry Goods" and "Variety Store" as depicted on the current plans. The "Kreigers General Mercantile" sign is existing. No additional building signage is being proposed. Proposed The applicant is proposing a freestanding sign and a western ranch gateway entrance. Pursuant to Old Town Specific Plan Section III.G.1, signage proposed within the Medium Density Residential Districts shall comply with Development Code Section 17.28.110 (Signs for Institutional and other Permitted Uses in Residential Districts). One freestanding business sign is permissible, no greater than 4 feet tall. Therefore, the proposed projecting monument sign is GAPlanning\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Pa h CUP\Planning\OTLRB Staff Repon.doc 3 allowable at a maximum four feet in height; and will be conditioned to be fabricated from sandblasted or carved wood. Fonts and colors will be reviewed under a separate permit consistent with Old Town sign design standards. Staff has determined that the proposed gateway entrance may be allowable based on an interpretation of the Old Town Specific Plan Parking Lot Guidelines (page IV-36) indicating that entry driveways to parking lots in Old Town should be designed to enhance the Old Town historic environment. However, staff is concerned that the language "Heritage Ranch" along the top of the gateway transforms the entry into a second monument sign and is not permissible. Staff recommends approval of the gateway entrance without this language provided that "knee braces" are added and it is painted to match the existing white split rail fence. RECOMMENDATION For consistency with the Old Town Specific Plan and City of Temecula Development Code, staff recommends that the proposed Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Historic appropriateness be approved based upon staffs recommended revisions: 1. One color scheme from the Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette is utilized to provide continuity between the structures. 2. The proposed gateway entry is painted to match the existing white split rail fence, "knee braces" are added, and the language "Heritage Ranch" is eliminated. Staff requests that the Old Town Local Review Board provide comments, and a recommendation for approval, regarding the Conditional Use Permit and Certificate of Historic Appropriateness. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions—Blue Page 5 2. Statement of Operations and Statement of Justification —Blue Page 6 GAPlmming\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Ranch CUP\Planing\OTLRB Staff Report.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 PLAN REDUCTIONS G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Ranch CUP\Planing\OTLRB Staff Report.doc 5 �tiT ONIX9.8NION3 NIAif3S e a n n h yF d� E € d Yh LUIs 3ii,Q3f# Iytol a �� ;g _ C, 3 ! !liptm ei S� Bi iill a LL m N l } j s 1¢ r1� i ei 1;I j{ill; }j '# €jry • # i� } ! w ae �' J Q }tii€ } $$ �'d! S$i€3j E{ i $si �`('�F($ _f8t[�j i � t1 c V O' V !3't. i j a} yips 1 g€,€ 1. 11 ii iii �$"aj �!}81g I}< i6 s gs'p F d F Z RL 5 U) - Ail ! "[ t81 1 8l8 !! i # ai. s 8Ff �'s ¢ 19 I# $# 8 i� {(°i � { i} ie} !;! p{ $ } # F p J Z � U F., ef aai €- Lit O3!i , 1t saaf # 1 Q • #fF ;$ F 71p:� 7F , }e jai ', $ O J N W J Is 1}ie F# S• ,I #iz�iEg§ # '� #�} #F#•,}$ } btu #Bi6 $F F Oi is a } ' #e ��`;' ) Ya # 3 }°` k $ F} F g ! $ a€ a 7 9 � s f al 8#$ � #Ii� € lit lit I € ��i�F�� iF. • } a 3 jE -,, ' 'ia6 f • j 'i If t I��f$ �a; ��t a 8 Y' €F i$ i f 'l lit sl $ 1 j E it ft oil it 11 1; �$ i j�! i �� �. 1 ` # f1t$ #tl g , ! 9E!! 3F! 1 a# ,gj�y if;iari j aF#i Ffq2;B � 8 8 #1 8 �} gE i `s IA itsij i Z � Fe' i # 8€' i 3'{9 # ip Alii li }t � 8± g;? it 3 1 11 2F; tal 11f#u�€i 91 #y# ij$ 9lis lit �� P al # {# aff�t :a Si ae niF (i�i� Ct 1 € !## P9 a.;•w 1�.Wim w rind�J 'JNLitT.BNI-JN.T NIAX3S ------------ NVId am u lu'l 11 a 1,110 aaaa 1 11 \ O `\ Y Y W W . W W F— t N 9 All PUJOLTREE i— i— t— i— i—i�s— [-�5�•�t� Wa. y't— if— i-o—�i— s— W �.Yp YmYR y ®f lsOfa r - - r - -_ — r - - � mm. � I I I � I 1 ii rr�H. ..�. :' I I •. I .. I I -- - -- --,_ I I 1= I „ - =__ _- I I _____----- — -- -- ��r[ic�r=�Fycrr� miiuuiiii , : IIIIIIIIIIIII i� - SII = 1��=KIII�11111111111111 ? IIIIIIIIIIIII - _ _'���44 n■■I AM :111111111111 �ENallE rig f - 17M a i Voll' n m Z.�.� m HVId EkllUVilFI U nvrassrrrovs .vrnxss x — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —X�_. — — FPi RANT CONC. SIDEWALK e P U J 0 L ozS T R E E T S 45'30'51' E 1 .99' TRACT NO. 30990 24' RESIDENTIAL DWY APP H —p 307 s `MAGNPII AT OF COLIC. — " �— '— ��SSNH e J0' CUTTER. WATER METER&VALVE CURB B GUTTER . 1008.00 SLIMED - WATER METER k VALVE g 9 r I e i.. CLfNV-0� CONC. PA7W I dill 1 WATER METER & VE I Imo'`. v pp R-40. .R d r n �mmI W 1010 I ' i r" CONC.PATN7 F F AIAr P P C am ONE STORY RES'0. Io1L55 $_ ..� - •1011.Bt 1 4 4 u _ E E%ISDNG $ D l ___ - ONE S ORY RES'D. "ID.REAU9N �'�• ___ 3 I �"-- _ g FF 1018.4 i - I y 102p our-------- 1�p '-" 35 MAP IS/278I CONC. PATIO I, "i0'SINEEEA�MA7ED AND p��`"' ' •lom.73 ABPNDONED PER MUnC-Cf " I } BOPR[I OF SNiPUMSOR5 ON -/0z _ .-- -- SHED j-i ; 1I1z-7 kECORDFD ON 2 s ----- ------ ------------------- IN _- ;. IN HOOK_304;" m_q I ii - "________-- --" ______ I ih i Awt, ------ _+ ti —� — — SOUTHWEST)ENE ;'"Y CHMN-UNN FENCE ' NON-POTABLE WATER MANHOI£-•, 0A0WA W,451276 _ ----- "INy�SEBS ON CONC. PAL ------ ------- to3D ---- -- ------------m3s — — — ----- —"'' N �y+� aemeow.�n w INIt z ---!F s �^wa01 N m 41aL�3S UNIOVtlJ � V wsYz �ovwz�w�'�� �NMBYNLON.B NLAX85 0 W) co I I I I I x + JZ $ W c� I mfim I _70-I b I � I 11 ii Zom N yI I U i / Y / / / Q I I N N Fwq I N I I I rzo + / u / I / dVWN / / / / I / g I � 1 T o 0 0 0 0 0 Y O tp N O O O O r r r r r r py Mro m o�ir s .w w"". —Ji SN'JIS aim Yamof T V p �'K OKfi!$$NIOK$ KtA}I$6 Y ao losvm6l'w n nw�mnmW 5'r xM< xU N W U Z J a w�qi s IWO w FT � E is x tq m_ � zct ATTACHMENT NO. 2 STATEMENT OF OPERATION AND STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION G:\Plamting\2007\PA07-0302 Temecula Heritage Ranch CUP\Planning\OTLRB Staff Report.doc 6 i Statement of Operations C] Hours and days of operation Open daily 10 A.M. — 5 P.M. Closed Tuesday and Wednesday except by appointment. ❑Numbers of Employees Owner operated, no additional employees. ❑Average daily peak trips generated Unknown. ❑Type of Equipment or processes used Authentic and period materials used, displayed, and described in an historically sensitive-manner. Description of hazardous materials (existing and new) None C].Other. Descriptions thateffectively describe proposed use Educational facility, . interactive historic site, Living history place. Statement of Justification 1 . Is the site suitable and adequate for the proposed use? Yes. The gentle slopping hillside, and immediate surrounding buildings have.a real feel of early Temecula. 2. Would the proposed use and design have a substantial adverse effect on traffic? No, Project is under 5,000 Square feet. 3. Would the proposed use have a substantial adverse impact on the general welfare of persons residing in the community? No. 4. is the design of the project compatible with the proposed development within the district and it's surroundings? Yes, the Arviso house is already been approved by the city as historically appropriate. Back Porch Addition Prior to WW2, no home seemed complete without its back porch, and that included the Arviso house. Until we began renovating the Arviso house, it too had a back porch. The back porch served a useful function as a place to perform domestic tasks such as laundry, and was where. one kept the icebox. However, with the extensive rebuilding that the building underwent, that porch was fully enclosed becoming a small room. This was largely due to security concerns; and since the rear of the property at.4t' and Mercedes was not serving a public function (as well as being several feet beneath the level of the first floor, there was no need to. have a rear exit. With the relocation of the Arviso house, we are now in need of a rear exit; and so we are planning to place it to the rear, and at the side. This.will allow us to present to the public a domestic place found in all but the crudest of early residences. Due to the steepness of the grounds behind where the Arviso house is. being placed, it is desirable to direct visitors away. from the rear of the building, as well as having an exit off the kitchen. The proposed placement works wellin accomplishing those. . goals. . The placement of the hospitality cabin adjacent to the Arviso house.will also minimize the visual imprint of the building. ITEM #3 STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD March 10, 2008 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0265 Temecula Stage Stop Comprehensive Sign Program Prepared by: Dana Schuma, Associate Planner APPLICATION INFORMATION: APPLICANT: Mathew Fagan Consulting Services 28464 Old Town Front Street Temecula, CA 92590 PROPOSAL: A Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex located at 28464 Old Town Front Street LOCATION: Generally located on the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street. EXISTING ZONING: Old Town Specific Plan: Tourist Retail Core (TRC) SURROUNDING ZONING: North Tourist Retail Core (TRC) South: Tourist Retail Core (TRC) East: Tourist Retail Core (TRC) West: Tourist Retail Core (TRC) GENERALPLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial (CC) EXISTING LAND USE: Temecula Stage Stop complex SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: Existing retail buildings (TRC) South: Existing retail buildings (TRC) East: Public parking lot(TRC) West: Chaparral Building (TRC) _ GAI'lanning\2007\PA07-0265 Stage Stop Building SIGN PROGRAM\Planning\OTI.RB Staff ReponAm 1 1 BACKGROUND On November 7, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07- 0176 for a Development Plan to redevelop the Temecula Stage Stop complex, a 0.37 acre site generally located at the northeast corner of Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street. The project was conditioned that a Comprehensive Sign Program be approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. On September 17, 2007 the applicant submitted an application for a Comprehensive Sign Program for the Temecula Stage Stop complex. A Comprehensive Sign Program application is required, per the requirements of the Development Code, whenever two or more businesses exist in a multi-tenant development. Many signs currently exist on the building; however, the approval of a Comprehensive Sign Program for this complex will ensure that all signs for existing tenants/suites will eventually come into conformance with this sigr> criteria and all new signs will be consistent with one.another and with the architectural design of the buildings. On November 13, 2007, staff provided the applicant with DRC comment letter which outlined staffs requested revisions to the Sign Program. Staff continued to work with the applicant via meetings and e-mail to ensure the all the concerns were addressed and to expedite the processing of the application. Staff received a second revision of the Sign Program on January 3, 2008, and a third version of the Sign Program on February 13, 2008. Most of the review comments were addressed in the last revision; however, there are still two issues that were not resolved to the satisfaction to staff. These issues are summarized below and can be resolved through the conditions of approval. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing a Comprehensive Sign Program for the buildings located at 28464 Old Town Front Street. The Temecula Stage Stop complex consists of three buildings interconnected by several interior courtyards, stairways, and pedestrian corridors. The Sign Program outlines signage criteria for each building. The sin criterion has been carefully 9 9 9 9 9 crafted to compliment the unique layout and architecture of the three buildings. The Sign Program criterion defines the allowable signage area per building frontage, allowable signage types, fonts, colors and materials, sign location, placement, and size. The proposed signage for the tenants within the complex includes wall mounted signs, projecting signs, under canopy pedestrian oriented signs, and hanging signs. The wall signs are to be fabricated from sandblasted or carved wood and are proposed to be installed on the buildings where appropriate for each tenant and as shown on the exhibits contained in the Sign Program. The projecting signs are proposed to be installed on decorative brackets along Old Town Front Street and the adjacent parking lot to the east. These projecting signs will be .installed on the second floor wooden beam elements to provide additional visibility for tenants as vehicles and pedestrians pass by. T he under canopy signs are proposed to be installed perpendicular to the building in the pedestrian hallways on the first and second floors. Hanging signs are proposed to be installed parallel to the buildings where appropriate and as shown on the Sign Program exhibits. The Sign Program also includes proposed complex identifications signs. These signs will act as entry signs when pedestrians approach the complex from the pedestrian corridor along Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street. The proposed complex identification signage includes an G:\P1anning\2007\PA07-0265 Smge S�PBuil ' SIGN PROGRAM\Pla 6\OTLRB Staff Report.do 2 existing monument sign and proposed roof sign along Old Town Front Street as well as a wall sign facing the east parking lot. ANALYSIS The Old Town Specific Plan sets maximum signage area criteria for all signs placed on buildings in Old Town. The Old Town Specific Plan allows for 1.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of building frontage for the primary frontage (Old Town Front Street) and 0.5 square feet of signage per linear foot of secondary building frontage (Sixth Street and the east parking lot). Each building incorporates some combination of wall signs, projecting signs, under canopy signs, hanging signs and painted wall signs to reach the total allowable sign area to be installed on the building. The proposed sign materials, fonts, and color palette are consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan design guidelines and architectural compatibility requirements. Staff has ensured that the signage is consistent with the architectural style of the building, and compatible with the surrounding area. The allowable signage sizes are in proportion with the building fagade and are consistent with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Although staff supports the Sign Program, there are two elements of the Sign Program that must be revised for the sign criteria to be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. Section III.G.4.of the Old Town Specific Plan specifically prohibits roof mounted signs. For that reason, staff does not support the proposed building identification roof sign. Staff recognizes that the Temecula Stage Stop complex is designed to resemble an old train depot, and that, old train depots often had roof mounted identification signs; however, staff does support a sign that is inconsistent with the Specific Plan and recommends the following condition: 1. Page 3 of the Sign Program shall be revised to eliminate the language, "with the exception of a train depot style building identification sign" from the prohibited sign sign types list and to eliminate the roofs g depictions from Exhibits B-H. Staff also does not support the four blade signs proposed on the east elevation of the new retail building signs as well. The blade signs are proposed for interior building units with interior courtyard entrances. These units do not have any frontage which justifies the signs along the eastern.elevation. Staff believes the signs are excessive for a single tenant and too many signs along the east elevation compromise the architectural integrity of the building. Staff recommends the following condition: 2. The Sign Program shall be revised to eliminate the four blade signs shown on the second story of east elevation from Exhibits B-H. RECOMMENDATION Staff has determined that the proposed Sign Program Criteria is consistent with the signage requirements and Design Guidelines in the Old Town Specific Plan, that the signage will compliment the building architecture, and the colors and materials will further enhance the building facade. Staff is requesting that the Old Town Local Review Board review, provide comments, and recommend.that the Planning Commission approve this project. ATTACHMENT 1. Comprehensive Sign Program—Blue Page 4 G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0265 Stage Stop Building SIGN PROGRAM\Planning\OTLRB Staff Report.doc 3 1 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PROGRAM G:\Planning\2007\PA07-0265 Stage Stop Building SIGN PROGRAM\Planning\OTLRB Staff Report.doc 4 STAGE STOP BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM C Lead Agency: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Dana Schuma, Associate Planner 951.694.6444 Prepared for: Mr. Ed Dool 28464 Old Town Front Street Temecula, CA 92590 951.202.5233 Prepared by: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 Matthew Fagan, Angie Douvres 951.699.2338 In Conjunction With: Walt Allen Architects 28465 Front Street, Suite 201 Temecula, CA 92591 Walter Allen, Chris Campbell, Martina Masarani 951.693.1012 February 2008 STAGE STOP BUILDING SIGN PROGRAM This Sign Program has been prepared for the purpose of establishing and maintaining high standards of quality and aesthetics throughout the Stage Stop Building. The Sign Program is intended to allow flexibility in signage to accommodate tenant needs and to maintain continuity within the Stage Stop Building. This Sign Program will allow flexibility in signage, yet not compromise the aesthetics of the Stage Stop Building. This will be achieved by establishing quality design guidelines and standards for all signs placed on the building, and by identifying approved sign envelopes for all proposed signs. The Stage Stop Building Site Plan is contained within Exhibit A. Sign envelopes for signage, including, but not limited to wall-mounted, projecting, hanging, center identification and monument signs are depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. All sign types shall be placed in a location that is approved by the landlord. They must comply with the design guidelines and size requirements of this Sign Program and are subject to approval by the City of Temecula. The Sign Program components, which are described in text and depicted with pictures and graphics are contained below and consist of the following: General Standards, Sign Standards, Approval Criteria, Non-Conforming Signs, Design Guidelines, and Modifications to the Sign Program. I. General Standards The standards, guidelines and provisions contained within this comprehensive Sign Program shall govern the exterior sign approvals for the Stage Stop Building. These guidelines are intended to ensure consistency, continuity and thematic harmony, and enhance the architectural quality of the building. Where an ambiguity arises or a different regulation exists, the standards within this comprehensive Sign Program shall be implemented as this program is structured to meet the 2 unique signage requirements of the Stage Stop Building and provide signage requirements where the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP) does not. If this comprehensive Sign Program does not address a particular situation, then the Director of Planning may be consulted for interpretation or clarification. Permitted Sian Types a. Wall Signs b. Supergraphics c. Building Name Signs d. Window Signs (including 2nd story) e. Under Canopy Signs f. Projecting Signs g. Temporary A-Frame or Sandwich Board Signs h. Daily Special Signs i. Holiday Bunting (shall comply with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan) j. Accessory Signs (such as parking, directional, building maps/floor plans, elevator signs, or other signs used for the entire building) k. Menu Boards I. Hanging Signs m. Rear Facing Signs n. Internal Signage o. Temporary Signs (cloth only) p. Outdoor Display q. MonumenttFree-standing Signs r. Awning Sign on 1 n Level Prohibited Sign Types* Roof Mounted Signs — with the exception of the train depot style building identification signs as depicted on exhibits B—H of this sign program • Animated, inappropriate signs that are not period appropriate or detract from the architectural quality of the building. • Rotating, moving, emitting or flashing signs. • Balloon signs ■ Ambient air balloons • Internally illuminated signs (including window signs) • Neon tube signs • Paper, cloth or plastic streamers or bunting Formed plastic or injection molded signs (excluding internal signage not visible from Old Town Front Street). Statues used for advertising ■ Traffic sign replicas ■ Plywood signs • Signs mounted on railings, banisters, or balusters • Non-governmental flags • Awning Signs *These provisions recognize there may be legally non-conforming signs. However, all signs that are not legally non-conforming and all new building signs shall be subject to the regulations contained in this Sign Program. 3 11. Sign Standards Wall signs shall be permitted at a ratio of one (1) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Old Town Front Street and Sixth Street, and one-half (.5) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Sixth Street (south elevation). Other signs, such as projecting, under canopy, etc., are not included in this wall sign ratio, but have their own size specification in this Sign Program listed below. All hanging and projecting signs shall be located within the approved envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. All other sign types such as wall, under canopy and window signs are given more flexibility of location and require the approval of the building owner and Planning Director if a sign is smaller than twelve square feet. If a sign is twelve square feet or larger, review by the Old Town Local Review Board (OTLRB) is required pursuant to the OTSP. Businesses are permitted a maximum of one and one-half (1.5) square feet of total sign area per linear foot of primary street frontage and one-half (.5) square feet per linear foot of secondary street frontage. Each tenant may use any combination of the following permitted sign types. Each tenant may have more than one sign type provided the maximum sign area shall comply with the permitted square feet of sign area allowed pursuant to building frontage and that the sign complies with the allowances prescribed within this Sign Program and as outlined below. a. Building Name Signs The intent of the building sign is to identify the Stage Stop Building. The maximum size shall not exceed 10% of the wall surface of the building elevation. Building name signs are permitted only in the specified areas depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H. l-^ IFd'r4.PL:1 , 1�,� b. Supergraphics The purpose of permitting wall supergraphics is to allow the advertising or depiction of products or scenery that may have been available in an 1890's marketplace. Supergraphics do not count against the sign allowance for the building provided that the supergraphic does not advertise a specific business. Maximum size shall not exceed 60% of the wall surface. 4 c. Wall Signs Walls signs shall be permitted at a ratio of one (1) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Old Town Front Street, and one-half (.5) square foot of signage per linear foot of building frontage along Sixth Street. This ratio does not include other signs such as projecting, under canopy, hanging, etc., but is only for wall signs. Wall signs shall always be in proportion and scale with the building elevation and building entry. Internal illumination of wall signs is prohibited. A Wall Sign shall be permitted at a tenant entrance located internally to the building so long as it is not visible from off-site or the public right of way. - �ti�� / USED CAM T�rrt�rur~.� d. Hanging Signs The maximum size is six (6) square feet; a minimum of seven (T) foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Hanging signs shall be located in the approved sign envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H to ensure the sign is in portion and scale with the building elevation and adjacent signs. Hanging signs are reserved solely for tenant identification and only one hanging sign shall be permitted per tenant. 31 c 5 e. Projecting Signs The maximum size of a projecting sign facing Old Town Front Street is six (6) square feet and shall not extend more than four feet from the wall surface. The maximum size of all other projecting signs is three (3) square feet and shall not extend more than four feet from the wall surface. All other No illumination is permitted. Projecting signs shall only be attached to the building or building columns (in the approved sign envelopes as depicted on Exhibits B, C, D, E, F, G and H), but not to poles or other signs. Projecting signs may encroach into the public right-of-way a maximum of three (3) feet subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works and Director of Planning. Projecting signs are reserved for tenant identification only and not intended as secondary signs. \ q f. Under Canopy Signs Permitted under a canopy, roof, covered walkway or porch (not parallel to the street); the maximum size of three (3) square feet; a minimum of seven (T) foot vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. Under Canopy signs shall always be in portion with the building and have a human scale. Under canopy signs are pedestrian oriented signs, not typically seen from the street but read by the strolling patron. An Under Canopy sign shall be permitted at a tenant entrance located within internal portions of the Stage Stop Building so long as it is not visible from off-site or the public right of way. g. Rear Facing Signs The Stage Stop Building has parking and businesses that only face the existing parking lot at Sixth Street. Each business is permitted a sign on the parking lot elevation and shall comply with the provisions of the sign types listed within this Sign Program. Rear facing signs shall be a maximum of three (3) square feet. h. Permanent Window Signs ,. On the ground level, window signs shall not exceed 20% of the total window and door areas visible from the exterior of the I building. On the second level, window signs shall not exceed 30% of the window or door areas visible from the exterior of ;t the building. Gold leaf and paint are permitted materials for ! Window Signs } j xvA i L A-Frame/Sandwich Board Signs One A-frame or sandwich board sign shall be allowed per property on Friday, Saturday, Sunday and legal holidays that fall on a Monday during business hours only. The maximum size is 3.5 feet high and 2 feet wide. A-frame signs shall not block the sidewalk and shall not be illuminated. No permit is required, but A- frame/Sandwich Board signs shall comply with these provisions. j. Daily Special Signs One daily special sign is permitted, up to four (4) square feet for each restaurant or other eating establishment. Daily Special Signs shall not obstruct pedestrian travel and shall be located outside of the public right-of-way. k. Menu Boards Menu boards may contain only the name of the menu item. One menu board is allowed for each restaurant or other eating establishment. The menu board shall not exceed four square feet and must be located on a wall adjacent to the main customer entrance. I. Temporary Signs Grand opening and special event signs are allowed in conformance with the provisions of the OTSP for permitted materials and the City of Temecula Development Code for permitted time frames of temporary cloth banners. m. Holiday Bunting Holiday bunting shall comply with the provisions of the OTSP. n. Accessory Signs General building signs such as parking, directional, pedestrian maps, etc., that direct patrons and pedestrians shall not be counted toward the total allowable building signage. r PUI .. 7 o. Interior Facing Signs Interior facing signs include any internal or interior signage not visible from the public view, and include, but are not limited to door signs; window signs; directional signs, directory, elevators; suite number signs; or lavatory signs. Internal signage shall not be included toward the total allowable building signage. Each business/tenant with an interior plaza frontage may have one sign not to exceed one and one-half (1.5) percent of the total interior wall area of the building. a p. Outdoor Display Replicas of items that were commonly found in the turn of the century, such as covered wagons, wagon wheels, railroad carts, and livestock, located out of the public right-of-way are encouraged. q. Monument/Free-standing Sign Monument signs are permitted for centers with 150' or more of street frontage. One (1) monument sign shall be allowed for the Stage Stop building. An existing/approved Monument/Free-standing Sign is currently located along the Old Town Front Street frontage. No changes or modifications are requested with this Sign Program. Any future changes requested for the existing monument sign must be consistent with the criteria for awning signs at the time of the request. s4 i _ f, AW ,{ 8 r. Awning Sign on 1" Level An existing/approved Awning Sign is located along the Sixth Street frontage. No changes or modifications are requested with this Sign Program. Any future changes requested for the existing awning sign must be consistent with the criteria for awning signs at the time of the request. No additional awning signs will be permitted within the Stage Stop Complex. Ill. Approval As mandated in OTSP Sign Regulations, Section G.2, a sign permit is required prior to placing, erecting, moving, reconstructing, altering, or displaying any sign within the Stage Stop Building. For all exterior signs two complete and fully dimensioned sets of colored shop drawings or photos of the proposed sign shall be submitted to the City of Temecula and the shop drawings or photos shall include the Tenant's entire building fagade elevation (as much as possible of the building elevation) showing the proposed sign to scale as well as storefront (partial building) elevation and dimensions, also to scale, showing the location, size, color, construction and installation details. A letter of authorization from the landlord or property owner is also required. If a sign is smaller than twelve square feet, it must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. Signs over twelve square feet shall be reviewed by the OTLRB. IV. Non-Conforming Signs Legally non-conforming signs shall be brought into conformance when existing tenants vacate the building or a new sign replaces the legally non-conforming sign. All other signs, including new signs, shall comply with the criteria, guidelines and standards of this Sign Program. V. Design Guidelines The following Design Guidelines are intended to ensure the signage for Stage Stop Building results in high quality signs that are compatible and complement the architectural style of the building and other appropriate signs that currently exist on the structure: • Placement of signage is an important element to the building's aesthetic quality. Signs shall be placed to relate to and enhance the building architecture. • Signs shall be placed in an appropriate location, in proportion with the scale of building elements. Signs may be placed in different areas. A particular sign may fit well on a 9 plain wall area, but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower store front. For example, a sign that is appropriate for the building entry may look inappropriate above the ground level. The approved sign envelopes and maximum size requirements stated above will help ensure proper placement and proportion of the signs. ■ Sign lettering should contain clear and legible fonts. Western style typefaces that are easy to read should be utilized. Decorative fonts are difficult to read and make the sign ineffective. ■ Provide a brief, clear message on the sign. Typically, the fewer words the more effective the sign. • Creative, unique, quality signs are encouraged. However, strange and awkward signs that are unnecessarily narrow, oddly shaped, or unrelated to the products or services being provided on site can restrict the legibility of the message. • When appropriate, utilize shapes and characteristics of the products being used or sold. • For pedestrian oriented signs such as projecting, hanging or wall signs, they should be smaller and have a human-scale, not oriented to the vehicle. • Incorporate directional and general building signage such as directory, parking, elevator, etc. atappropriate locations and entries to guide the patrons throughout the site. 9 P 9 Colora Maferia/s In order to achieve continuity and compatibility among signs, the colors and materials need to be similar and complementary to each other and the building. The following guidelines should be incorporated when selecting sign colors and materials: ■ Colors should be compatible with the architecture and color of the building and contribute to the design integrity. • Colors should be from the approved Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette. However, nationally recognized colors and logos which deviate from the approved color palette shall be reviewed by the OTLRB and may be permitted with OTLRB approval. ■ Some color combinations render a sign illegible. Therefore careful consideration should be given to the color selection. • Use significant contrast between the background, lettering or symbol colors. ■ Limit the colors on one sign. Too many colors overwhelm the basic function of communication. Limited use of the accent colors can increase legibility, while large areas of competing colors tend to confuse the reader. Given the early 1900's western nature of Old Town and the Stage Stop Building, the sign needs to reflect a period appropriate material that will be complementary to the architecture of the building. The following are materials that would be appropriate for the Stage Stop Building: 10 Permitted Sian Materials • Signs made of carved or sand blasted wood. • Signs of synthetic material that take on the appearance of wood are permitted; however, approval of the landlord, Planning Director and OTLRB is required prior to installation of the sign. • Metal ■ Wrought Iron or Similar Material • Painted Wall Signs Prohibited Sian Materials • Plywood • Neon • Injection Molded or Formed Plastic • Vinyl VI. Modifications to the Sian Proaram Although this Sign Program was written to be a long-range planning document that will be effective now as well as in the future, it is anticipated that modifications will be necessary over time as the built environment in Oid Town changes and the composition of the tenants change (i.e. if antique businesses are no longer the prominent business in Old Town or more restaurants are developed). Modifications shall be approved through an amendment to this Sign Program by a separate planning application, review by the OTLRB and approval by the Planning Director. List of Exhibits A. Site Plan B. South Elevation C. East Elevation D. West Elevation E. Section Through Bus Bay Building F. Section Through Wine&Beer Garden G. First Floor Site Plan H. Second Floor Site Plan 71 I >VIaY�.1p1�Y � �— vw IM;ti„Pm uoisuudxg dole 9BEIS x Y ��8jffi ' f Z O erk - r _ Z Q FXQ ffie a w _J maa = Ow w c~n cn w co 1111141 1 1 11 lual G ' - I _ I 1 5 Y o N � O C7 0 o W j �.� z z WW z0 o a ma- ~ a X j ¢ a y I_ ww N Z Z c7 °° a �� c o u, z W D — a0 Z Z N Q = U 0F- Q (� r U O W fN z F Z �❑ OW Wz F- a O ow o � y rx z f N y w z N O 0 Z W O N O Lx z tyii U) Z 3 U Q � o z a a " x < ®1 a a a CO m WCl- W E w O 2 0 X0 W w a w z FnFn W w Q z 0 O a - z W U O I.- W N ©1 m cc W W Z CC J 0 LU W a �i . . � \ z - » ` LL0 B � z § w \ | Z Cl) k / 3 z B § t 2 < \ . © q § & b j > 2 / ] 2 = = I q m g o w cc Z 0 2 d w § § § K CO \ `\ \ § \ / 2 § Cl) C 2 0 § % z LU \ § § # z : o ! 2 \ q z � I z z Z � 0 ui Ow � /Q o �m/'� z a W LL VJ h: i \ X ., Cc J W CO ¢ In z x�� � F fll IZR X h 4Ti�+, z /O = fi� 4,i tl4 a W VZ W vJ 0 41 iii.xx _ a W LL O \ Q r Z _ Q cc = U (7 Z ~ � N z x'p wU LLI Q O J cr G W d NI 3 O ~ U W UE-Imn 0� 7,111,1�1111 I. ' Illi z w zZ NFn } Z � ® W o Ow z U) w ui U) Z CO cc O U LL d w a CO w z ~ p (7 w N z W a (7 O z v� w0 z F w a z � S a ¢ a < S L) 0 z in F— mW U a O z z N d 0 7 e U Z ® [ w U) �r..a ch J {{ Z N N Ir Z z WN W W ZdIr O a v Q W C3 a H �_ a ¢ W _ ¢ Z Z ¢ O mI J W O N Z Ir W X000 - ' __ a w O CD CL 7 J r Z pl z F5 W U) LL a o Z Z C7 (7 CA a O Z N w X CL) Q O - W f� 1C w a ¢ z p: .r I_ f � c � I ® ' � � ■ h ' I c I , z 2 z Cl) c7 COU. CO O W Z (S — Z N N z D y z o W z O OLL � I i U J ZCO z W - O U Q zz z C X f O Q Z Z m � 0 r 1 I Z CO 4 0 M F p r m z = O � ^_ 5 z W U cs w � W l in W } Lu z Fn 0i d 0 z z W z z z > _ CO QOv o W H U v i F z N r I i m 0 W w a Q z F CODE ENFORCEMENT REPORT CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Old Town Local Review Board FROM: Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning DATE: March 10, 2008 SUBJECT: Code Enforcement Actions in Old Town 1. 42045 3'd Street. Trash and debris, lawn mowers etc. being stored in public view. A verbal warning was given on January 25 to the property owner to remove the items. All items were removed and the case was closed. 2. 42081 3rd St. A violation letter was sent to the property owner advising to remove all of the trash and debris and to secure the house and garage. An on-going investigation. CEO to continue to monitor for compliance. 3. 28670 Old Town Front St. A verbal warning given to The Chocolate Florist on January 22 for the wrong color awnings. CEO to monitor. No change in the awnings' color. A violation letter was mailed to the property owner advising to change the awning color and to get minor modification for the awnings. 4. No report from Gale Cunningham of the Farmers Market. RAW Town\Code Enforcement Report@0081MEM0 OTLRB 3-10-08.doc 1 REQUESTS TO SPEAK OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA After completing, please return to the Minute Clerk. Thank You! Date: 3//'h I wish to speak on Agenda Item No.: j For Against ❑ Subject: Name: Address: If you are rep tinting amrganization or group, please give the name: The Planning Director will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Thank you! REQUEST TO SPEAK TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Date �` UL I wish to speak on Agenda Item No. (" U B LT-C CdK%a�T For Against Subject: Name: Address: The presiding officer will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the public podium and state your name and address for the record. If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: