The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About060408 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans-with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will ~, enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 I ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JUNE 4, 2008 - 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 2008 -24 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Carey Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is athree-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Long Range Planning Application Number LR08-0035. to adopt the alignment for the Western Bypass Corridor from Cherry Street to iust south of Rancho California Road Station 208+00, case planner: Steve Brown RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER LR08-0035, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT ADOPT THE ALIGNMENT FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR FROM CHERRY STREET TO JUST SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, STATION 208+00, AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO to modify sign criteria and clarify use regulations. case planners: Cheryl Kitzerow and Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08- 0003, ASIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PROMENADE MALL MAIN STREET EXPANSION AND ENTRY UPDATES INCLUDING ENTRY MONUMENTS, SITE DIRECTIONALS, MALL ENTRANCES, PARKING GARAGE DIRECTIONALS AND CAR COUNTERS, PARKING LOT DIRECTIONALS, DIRECTORIES, VALET, BANNERS, BLADE SIGNS, AND MAIN STREET TENANT SIGNS (APN 910-130-072) 2.2 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND SIGN CRITERIA AND TO ALLOW DAY SPAS AS A PERMITTED USE IN PLANNING AREAS 2 AND 3" (PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER 08-0081) 3 Planning Application Number PA06-0389, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for aself-storage facility, case planner: Dana Schuma RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a Resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA06-0389, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 26,418 SQUARE FOOT SELF-STORAGE FACILITY WITH NINE STORAGE BUILDINGS AND 42 COVERED RV PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 41705 OVERLAND DRIVE (APNS 921-480-044 AND 921-480- 045) COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, June 18, 2008, 6:00 P.M. City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ITEM NO. 1 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 21, 2008 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Stephen Brown, Principal Planner PROJECT Long Range Planning Application Number LR08-0035 SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Alignment for the Western Bypass Corridor from Cherry Street to Just South of Rancho California Road, Station 208+00 CEQA: Statutory Exemption Section 15262 & 15306 PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: City of Temecula General Plan Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided) Designation: Zoning Designation: N/A Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: North: South. East: West: BACKGROUND SUM Vacant Land and Via Industria Right-of-Way City of Murrieta, Vacant, and Sports Fields Vacant and Office Industrial and Office Vacant and Escarpment MARY The Western Bypass Corridor is ident'fiied in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan as a Major Arterial (4Lanes divided with 100' right of way) on the west part of the City. This bypass would connect the most northerly part of the City, Cherry Street, to the most southerly access to Interstate 15 (I-15) and State Route 79 South (SR-79 South). In addition to quick access to t-15, this connector would provide motorists with an alternate north-south route when I-15 is congested within the City limds. On March 21, 2008, the City Council approved an engineering services agreement with URS to complete a specific alignment study for the Western Bypass Corridor, Project PW05-10. During the course of the study, the City entered into negotiations with a potential developer interested in developing properties along the southern portion of the Western Bypass Corridor, from just south of Rancho California Road to SR-79 South. As a result of these negotiations, it was determined that dividing the Westem Bypass Corridor alignment into two segments would provide the most flexibility for potential development along the southem portion of the corridor. ANALYSIS The northem segment extends from Cherry Street on the north to just south of Rancho Califomia Road, Station 208+00. The southern segment of the corridor would extend from the southerly terminus of the northerly segment to SR-79 South. The City maintained responsibility for development of the alignment of the northerly segment, while the property owner would be responsible for finalizing the alignment of the southerly segment. The ownership of the property along the southern segment has changed since the alignment study was finalized. The City will continue to require that any development along the southem segment of the Westem Bypass Corridor complete an alignment that is consistent with adopted City Standards and that is consistent with the alignment of the northem segment. The northern segment alignment study indicates that the Western Bypass will include a bridge over Rancho Califomia Road. It also identfies two altemate connectors to the Western Bypass from Rancho Calrfornia Road. Alternate 1 proposes a connection from the south side of Rancho Calrfornia Road to the west side of the Westem Bypass and Attemate 2 proposes a connection from the north side of Rancho Califomia Road to the west side of the Westem Bypass. Adoption of the alignment and the two alternate connectors as shown on the plans will give staff discretion as to which connector to use based on future development in the area. Adoption of the alignment of the northerly segment of the Westem Bypass Corridor will give developers a guideline to adhere to when developing their properties along this corridor. It will also enable the City to condition these potential developers to dedicate the required right-of--way and build a portion of the Westem Bypass when they develop or redevelop their property. Approval of this alignment is consistent with the City's General Plan as amended and in particular the Circulation Element. Further, the adoption of the Northem Alignment is part of the continuing process refining the potential alignment of the Westem Bypass and is in the broadest sense, is a planning tool only. This is not a commitment to construct the Northern Alignment as planned nor is it a commitment to acquire and real property, real property interest within the proposed alignment, moreover, nothing in this resolution is intended to be a commitment to acquire any real properly or real property interests within the area of the Northem Alignment as planned. The adoption of the Northern Alignment as presented does not require the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment. Any dedication of land for the Northem Alignment as presented will ony be made after the Director of Planning, Planning Commission, or City Council, which ever is the deciding body of a land use application makes and individualized determination as part of the entitlement process that the appropriate nexus and fair share requirements for any such dedication are met in accordance with applicable law. Nothing in the resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, to require the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment, as planned. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Cal'rfornian on May 24, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be statuitoraly exempt from further environmental review (Sections 15262 Feasibility and Planning Studies and 15306 Information Collection). ATTACHMENTS vicinity Map PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft City Council Resolution Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER LR08-0035, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT IT ADOPT THE ALIGNMENT FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR FROM CHERRY STREET TO JUST SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, STATION 208+00, AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO Section 1. Recitals. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Western bypass Corridor is identified in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan as a Major Arterial (4-Lanes divided with 100' right of way) on the west part of the City. This bypass would connect the most northerly part of the City, Cherry Street, to the most southerly access to Interstate 15 (I-15), State Route (SR) 79 South. B. On March 21, 2006, the City Council approved an agreement with URS Corporation to provide professional engineering services by doing a specific alignment study for the Westem Bypass Corridor, Project # PW05-10. C. The proposed alignment of the northern segment of the Westem Bypass Corridor from Cherry Street to just south of Rancho California Road, Station 208+00, is set forth on plans entided "Alignment Study Westem Bypass Corridor Project # PW05- 10 City of Temecula" on file in the Office of the Director of Public Works ("Northern Alignment"). D. Adoption of the proposed Northern Alignment is part of the on-going study of the Western Bypass Corridor. Adoption of a more specific alignment than is shown on the Circulation element of the General Plan will enable the City to continue to study the financing of the Westem Bypass Corridor and its ultimate feasibility. E. Government Code Sections 65400 and 65402 provide for the Planning Commission's review of proposed public works projects and its determination of whether the projects are consistent with the General Plan. F. The proposed Northern Alignment, as planned, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Temecula, and each element thereof, and, in particular, it is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. G. The adoption of the proposed Northern Alignment, as planned, is a planning tool, part of the continuing planning process for the Western Bypass Corridor, and is not a commitment to construct the Western Bypass Corridor. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, as a commitment for construction of the Northern Alignment, as planned. H. The adoption of the proposed Northem Alignment, as planned, is not a commitment to acquire any real property or real property interests within the area of the Northern Alignment, as planned. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, as a commitment to acquire any real property or real property interests within the area of the Northern Alignment, as planned. I. The adoption of the proposed Northern Alignment, as planned, does not require the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment. Any dedication of land for the Northern Alignment, as planned, will only be made after the Director of Planning, Planning Commission, or City Council, as the applicable deciding body of a land use application, makes an individualized determination as part of the entitlement process that the appropriate nexus and fair share requirements for any such dedication are met in accordance with applicable law. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, to require the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment, as planned. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The adoption of the proposed "Alignment Study Western Bypass Corridor Project # PW05-10 City of Temecula" as described in this Resolution is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality, Public Resources Code Sections 2100 et seq. ("CEQA") pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15262 and 15306 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15262, 15306) because the proposed action only involves the planning and feasibility of the Western Bypass Corridor and is not a commitment to real property acquisition for the Westem Bypass Corridor or its construction. Section 3. Recommended Adoption of Northern Alignment, as Planned. Based upon the findings set forth above, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed "Alignment Study Westem Bypass corridor Project # PWOS-10 City of Temecula" for the purposes of planning the financing and determining the feasibility of the western Bypass Corridor. Section 4. Certification. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4th day of June 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. OB- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of June 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CC RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE ALIGNMENT FOR THE WESTERN BYPASS CORRIDOR FROM CHERRY STREET TO JUST SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, STATION 208+00 AS PLANNED, AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council finds, determines and declares as follows: A. The Western Bypass Corridor is identified in the Circulation element of the City's General Plan as a Major Arterial (4-Lanes divided with 100' right of way) on the west- part of the City. This bypass would connect the most northerly part of the City, Cherry Street, to the most southerly access to Interstate 15 (I-15), State Route (SR) 79 South B. On March 21, 2006 the City Council approved an agreement with URS Corporation to provide professional engineering services by doing a specific alignment study for the Westem Bypass Corridor, Project # PW05-10. C. The proposed alignment of the northern segment of the Western Bypass Corridor from Cherry Street to just south of Rancho California Road, station 2008+00, is set for the on plans entitled "Alignment Study Western Bypass Corridor Project # PW05- 10 City of Temecula° on file in the Office of the Director of Public Works ("Northern Alignment°). D. Adoption of the proposed Northern Alignment is part of the on-going study of the Westem Bypass Corridor. Adoption of a more specific alignment than is show on the Circulation Element of the General Plan will enable the City to continue to study the financing of the Westem Bypass Corridor and its ultimate feasibility. E. Government Code Sections 65400 and 65402 provide for the Planning Commission's review of proposed public works projects and its detennination of whether the projects are consistent with the General Plan. F. On June 4, 2008, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the proposed Northern Alignment at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the proposal. Following due consideration of the record and the comments at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted its Resolution No. 08- G. The proposed Northem Alignment, as planned, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Temecula, and each element thereof, and, in particular, it is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan. H. The adoption of the proposed Northem Alignment, as planned, is a planning tool, part of the continuing planning process for the Westem bypass Corridor, and is not a commitment to construct the Westem bypass corridor. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, as a commitment for construction of the Northem Alignment, as planned. I. The adoption of the proposed Northem Alignment, as planned, does not require the dedication of land for the Northem Alignment. Any dedication of land for the Northem Alignment, as planned, will only be made after the Director of Planning, Planning Commission, or City Council, as the applicable deciding body of a land use application, makes an individualized determination as part of the entitlement process that the appropriate nexus and fair share requirements for any such dedication are met in accordance with applicable law. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, to require the dedication of land for the Northem Alignment, as planned. J. The adoption of the proposed Northem Alignment, as planned, does not required the dedication of land for the Northem Alignment. Any dedication of land for the Northem Alignment, as planned, will only by made after the Director of Planning, Planning Commission, or City Council, as the applicable deciding body of a land use application, makes an individualized determination as part of the entitlement process that the appropriate nexus and fair share requirements for any such dedication are met in accordance with applicable law. Nothing in this Resolution is intended, nor shall it be construed, to require the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment, as planned. K. On 2008, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law on the proposed Northern Alignment, as planned, at which time all persons interested had the opportunity to present oral and written evidence on the proposal. Following due consideration of the record and the comments at the public hearing, the City Council adopted this Resolution. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Western Bypass Corridor was previously assessed under the Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified for the City's General Plan Update in April 2005. The adoption of the proposed "Alignment Study Westem Bypass Corridor Project # PWOS-10 City of Temecula" as described in this Resolution is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality, Public resources Code Sections 2100 et seq. ("CEQA°) pursuant to the provisions of Sections 15262 and 15306 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. §§ 15262, 15306) because the proposed action only involves the planning and feasibility of the Western bypass Corridor and is not commitment to real property acquisition for the Western Bypass Corridor or its construction. Section 3. Adoption of Northern Aignment, as Planned. Based upon the findings set forth above, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopts the "alignment Study Western Bypass Corridor Project # PW05-10 City of Temecula" for the purposes of planning the financing and determining the feasibility of the Westem Bypass Corridor; provided, however, that nothing in this Resolution is intended, not shall it be construed, as a commitment for construction of the Northern Alignment, as planned, a commitment to acquire any real property or real property interests within the area of the Northern Alignment, as planned, nor as a requirement for the dedication of land for the Northern Alignment, as planned. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: LR08-0035 Cdy of Temecula Western Bypass Circulation Alignment from Cherry Street to south of Rancho Califomia Road Adopt the alignment for the Westem Bypass Corridor from Cherry Street to just south of Rancho Califomia Road Environmental: In accordance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon previous assessment by the City of Temecula General Plan Update EIR April, 2005; therefore, a Notice of Determination will be filed in compliance with CEQA Case Planner: Stephen Brown Place of Hearing: .City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: June 4, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 6946400. Notice or Public Hearing ITEM NO. 2 STAFF REPORT- PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: June 4, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Associate Planner PROJECT Planning Application Numbers PA08-0003 and PA08-0081: SUMMARY: A Spedfic Plan Amendment (Minor) to the Temecula Regional Center (TRC) Specific Plan regarding signage, as well as a change to the land use matrix for Massage Parlors, Turkish Baths and Similar Personal Service Establishments (`Day Spas°). Proposed changes indude increasing sign heights from 12 to 23 feet for entry monuments, increasing the allowable sign area for entry monuments and site directional monuments, allowing for new monument signs (secondary site directionals, pedestrian freestanding directionals and wall mounted directionals), and off- premise signage on the new parking structures, not previously anticipated. In addition, the proposed land use matrix change would allow Day Spas as a permitted use. A Sign Program for the Promenade Mall Main Street Expansion and entry updates including: entry monuments, site directional, mall entrances, parking garage directionals and car counters, parking lot directionals, directories, valet, banners, blade signs, and Main street tenant signs. CEQA: Negative Dedaration Section 15070 BACKGROUND SUMMARY On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06- 0293, aDevelopment Plan to expand the Promenade Mall by 125,950 square feet with an outdoor life-style main street shopping center consistent with square footage allowed in the Temecula Regional Center Spedfic Plan. This application also included a Conditional Use Permit to construct two parking structures. At the time of approval the elevations and other plan details were mostly conceptual. The applicant explained that along with the expansion, plans to 'makeover' the existing mall would be proposed; therefore the Planning Commission placed the following conditicn on the project: `The applicant shall submit a comprehensive plan for faFade improvements and signage modifications to the existing mall buildings/signs for the review and approval of the Planning Commission (as a current business item - no public hearing) of the City to ensure the expansion is compatible with the existing center (mod~ed by Planning Commission 2/21/07). ° On January 7, 2008, Forest City submitted a Master Sign Program. The intent of the new signs is to replace the existing signs characterized by pinwheels and jazz instruments in primary colors with a more timeless and classical look highlighted by neutral colors, and a bronze/cursive "P" Promenade Mall logo. The applicant has described the new design theme as promoting "sophistication and elegance.° These new monuments would compliment the revised architecture for the mall entries that was approved by the Planning Commission in December 2007. Upon review of the initial Sign Program submittal, staff determined the proposed signage was inconsistent with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263, and a Specific Plan Amendment would be required. On March 28, 2008, Forest City submitted a Minor Specfc Plan Amendment to modify the signage criteria in the Temecula Regional Center Spec Plan. Also included wfth the Speck Plan Amendment is a change to the allowable use matrix to permit Day Spas without a Conditional Use Permit in Planning Areas 1 and 2 (consistent with the Development Code). The IBC reviewed the proposed signage on April 8, 2008 and April 22, 2008, at which time they expressed their support for the proposal. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed. ANALYSIS Specific Plan Amendment The proposed Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) is a request to modify the Temecula Regional Center Speck Plan for monument signs, directional signs, theatre signs, to replace the Design Guidelines for the Mall with the proposed Sign Program, and to allow Day Spas as a permitted use. The changes include the request to increase sign heights from 12 to 23 feet for three entry monuments, increasing the allowable sign area for entry monuments and site directional monuments, allowing for new monument signs (secondary site directionals, pedestrian freestanding directionals and wall mounted directionals), and off-premise signage on the new parking structures, not previously anticipated (as indicated on the attached strike-thru/underline version). In addition, the proposed land use matrix change would allow Day Spas as a permitted use. Sion Size and Height Below is a comparison table identifying the current Specific Plan requirements and proposed Specific Plan Amendment. Specific Plan Requirement Proposed Specific-Plan Amendment Pa a 111-61 Ident~ed as "Primary Entry Monumentation" Change to "Major entry monuments" -allow five - identfes anchor tenants, 12-feet maximum at maximum 23 feet, identifies project (Sign A1) hei ht "Primary Entry Monument" - 36 feet in height Change to "Regional Center Monument" -one (PA 2 onry) sign with maximum height of 12 feet Si n A2 "Secondary Tenant Monuments" -six-feet Change to "Minor entry monuments with tenant maximum height listing" - 23 feet in height (Sign A4) and "Minor Entry Monuments with theatre marquee" - 22.5 feet S' n A3 Addresses required on all monument signs Deleted; not on existing signs; not required on monuments er Fire/Police Pa a 111-63 "Directional Signs", three-feet max height Change to "Site Directionals", "Secondary Site Directionals" (new), "Freestanding Directionals" new ,and "Wall Mounted Directionals" new "Site Diredionals" -five feet (Similar to existing provisions for "Secondary Tenant Monuments") five locations - Si n B "Pedestrian Signs" (Page IV-66 -Design "Freestanding Direcfionals" -11-foot maximum, Guidelines only) six square feet per face with four face maximum si n area Si n K "Wall Mounted Directionals° -11-foot maximum, six square feet per face with two face maximum si n area Si n L °TenanUParking directional signs, six feet, 40 Secondary Sde Directionals -five feet, 33 square uare feet feet maximum si n area five locations - Si n C Page IV-55 Add text that Design Guidelines do not apply to Mall Expansion or entry monuments (these standards are in ro osed Si n Pro ram Pa a IV-66 Theater and Special Event Facilities (cinema Increase height to 23 feet sin 21 feet in hei ht Off-Site Signs The applicant is proposing to add off-premise signs to the east and west parking structures per an agreement Forest City has with two major tenants. On the east parking structure, an Edwards Cinema sign with 24inch high letters (Times New Roman font with Edwards logo, which is consistent with the existing signs for the Cinemas) would be added to a tower element on the south elevation facing the Ring Road. On the west parking structure, two Macy's signs with 24-inch high letters would be located on the south and west elevations of the corner tower element: Allowable Use Matrix Also included in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a modficetion to Table IIA, Schedule of Permitted Uses, to allow "Massage Parlors, Turkish Baths and Similar Personal Service Establishments" (Day Spas) as permitted ("P") uses in Planning Areas 1 and 2. The proposed change would be consistent with the commercial zoning districts throughout the City where such uses do not require a use permit, but are rather permitted uses. When originally approved in 1994, the Specific Plan was surrounded by vacant residential and commercial lands. Over the past 14 years, the surrounding area has been developed into a thriving commercial area, with residential uses to the east. The intensity of development has changed the character of the project site. The proposed sign height increases, and additional sign types for the mall will be consistent with the commercial intensity of the project site and surroundings. The signs will be designed as up-scale and enhanced structures. Also, the intent of the new signs is to replace the existing signs, which are characterized by pinwheels and jazz instruments in primary colors, with a more timeless and classical look highlighted by neutral colors, and abronze/cursive "P" Promenade Mall logo. The applicant has described the new design theme as promoting "sophistication and elegance" and is intended to compliment the revised archftecture for the mall entries that was approved by the Planning Commission in December 2007. The new signs will enhance the visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. There are five new entry monument signs proposed to replace five that already exist. The two existing monument signs at Winchester East and West are 23 feet high and would be replaced with signs the same height. The other three signs at Ynez Road South, Ynez Road North, and Margarita Road are ten feet tall, but would be replaced with 23-foot high entry monuments. The height increase is consistent with the intensity of surrounding development. The proposed allowable use matrix change to allow Day Spas as a permitted use is consistent with the City's Development Code for all commerclal districts. All future Day Spas would be subject to design review and approval per City standards, including the requirement for a Massage Establishment permit, as appropriate. Sian Program Many of the components of the proposed Sign Program (monuments/directionals) have been discussed above. In addition to these signs, the Sign Program provides for Sign Design Criteria for all tenant ident~cation signs for the Promenade Mall Main Street expansion, plus on-site vehicle and pedestrian directory signs. Each tenant on Main Street will be required to have a fascia and blade sign. Optional signs depending on architectural elements and applicability to each individual building facade include vertical marquee signs, canopy signs, wall mounted plaques, window graphics, awning graphics, and inlaid vestibule floor signs. Staff has reviewed the design and location of all other signs including directionals, banners, and valet identification for consistency and appropriate location so as to avoid clutter and promote efficient and effective sign location and design (Exhibits 15 and 16 in Sign Program). LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on May 24, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an initial study, it has been determined the project will not have a sign cant impact on the environment; therefore, a negative declaration has been prepared for the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of PA08-0003 and PA08- 0081, Sign Program and Speclfic Plan Amendment, to the Ciry Council, subject to the Findings. FINDINGS Sian Program (Code Section 17.28.080 The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. . All of the signs shall be incuded in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape. All signage proposed for the Main Street expansion and entry monument enhancements are included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates entry monuments, site directional, mall entrances, parking garage directionals and car counters, parking lot directionals, directories, valet, banners, blade signs and Main Street tenant signs. The sign types provide for visual interests and an upscale theme. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to the buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, colors, or design motifs included in the building being identified. The proposed monument signage incorporates the same arohdecfural elements as the new building entries including, colors, materials, and the "P" Promenade logo. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business while maintaining the building's architectural style. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to surrounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs.. The surrounding development will not be adversely affected 6y the proposed signage. The proposed project is in the west-central part of the City. Surrounding uses include varying densities of residential uses, commercial uses, industrial and office uses, and the 1-f5 freeway. The proposed project is within the approved Temecula Regional Center specific plan area. Allowing new signs would not adversely affect the surrounding shopping centers or neighborhoods, or obscure any adjacent approved signs. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. The Development Code allows revisions to Sign Progrems either by completing a Minor or Major Mod cation application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively bythe Planning Department. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height. With the approved Speck Plan Amendment, the proposed Sign Program would be consistent with the sign standards listed in the Temecula Regional Center Speck Plan while satisfying the applicant's request in sign variation in sizes, colors, and styles. Specific Plan Amendment (Section 17.16.020E The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment does not change the land use of the Specific Plan, which maintains consistency with the General Plan. The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the Development Code and staff has made the appropriate findings to support the Sign Program. In addition, allowing day spas as a permitted is consistent with the Development Code allowing "Personal Service Shops" as a permitted use in all commercial zones. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Sign Criteria and allow day spas as a permitted use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city as supported in the conclusion of the Initial Study prepared for this project. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property is currently developed as a major shopping center and surrounded by other urban uses. The proposed amendment does not change the land use designations of the Specific Plan. The proposed Sign Program will allow taller and varied signage from previously identified in the Specific Plan and allow day spas as a permitted, rather than conditional use. The subject property is physically suitable for this type of development. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will accommodate modified signage to improve the aesthetics and compatibility with the existing and surrounding development. Allowing day spas as a permitted, rather than conditional use will not have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood as documented in the Initial Study for this project. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Specific Plan Amendment -Excerpts from Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan Sign Program PC Resolution -Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A -Draft CC Ordinance PC Resolution -Sign Program Initial Study Notice of Public Hearing " AERIAL MAP 0 325 850 1,300 1,950 Fee 7Ne mep raa msM trytM CIN aTameada GeagapMC Infamabn System. Them«bdHvaacan ereemeP~Mete RY+aeWe COUey ASeesaaya Upm6nent atl iM TanpoM1e W n ap Latl Mnepanvi PyacY a PovaW a ca,nr. Ile CiN aTameale amen« m wenrey a bpal m~eneiletyb Bn tr0ennetlon antrlstlm tllb mep Oete ar10 yaamalbn ~ep«saeE an tlds mep w eubbab tycme end matYkalbn TM Geopeplik iryonnetlon System eM ' atwaart«shadtlMquarleEbew maNamaMmnmim. lice map V rol brgXbp a roiBla City of Temecula PA08-0081 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT TEXT ' ~. }{ ~. i a z i z i r •: ~~IIa ' ' - .:se»aovua ors Pgei,~rr$n ilsea •. ~ PlSnnfing ALea D&3GBIPI~ION OF•USS • --- .. ~= - • a 1 .. s .. 7:ealher (looda Stores - r'". - . .: ,:.. .. -. :':.P . - :: F, :;, • . $ .I.~giad Petrolisam Service Stations, not indnding the cancua~~ :.. - rent sale of beei'and wine. provided the total papacity a~f aH ~ P .: P '~ ". ~~.' ~.. • - tanks shall qet e~a'iliooo gaIIaae ~ - ; ; ;. : _ : • Liquid Petroleum Service Stations; lndnding the concvrnent - .: . , ~ .-~::; ~ .~ - . . • sale o£beer aad.wine fer off-pr~mse consumption, p¢~ovided ~ :•..: ~ C;; ' ` : :X: ' the~tai capadtynfall taairsshau•nntexceed:loo00 gal-•.. .:<: , ~ Ions ~ . , ; . . Lignar Stares ~ • P - P: •-' ': Y' Isocksmith.Shops P . P ~ % , Ma>1 Order Bnsinesaes . ~ P ~ ~.: P' . ~. P Manufacturers Agents .. ; :_ P . ~P P ' Manufacturing of prodads similar to, but not, limited. to, _tlie ~ " ~ . following: ~ . . Custom--made product, prooesaiag, assembling, packaging, .. and fabrication of'goods within enclosed building, ands as .1~~y, ~tTh'8. art old, "clothing, labor intensive %° ; %' - j. :.' `P maeufacturirig, asamnbly, atad,repair processes` which do not.. . ~" - - involve &`equent trac$ tiaffic. : ` Mai]nets; iadnding but not ]iimiteti to Food, Wholesale, .. ... _ - ;. : ;; _. ' Pscduoe; Fririt, Vegetable, FFsh; and Poultry apd'Meat P -P° ~ X _ :: Markets, but not including 59aughtering . .Massage Farlars,llnrk3sh Eaths and Sirpiler Personal ~ ~ .°~ . P :: '~~`'~ ?' ~ Service Estalilishmenta Mim-Storage ar Pdinf-Warehouse ~ C' • C .: > ° :C (3) The maximum height for parking lighting fixtures shall not exceed forty feet (40'). On-Site Signs: (1) Retail Commercial Entry Monumentation (a) Major entry monumentation signage is intended to identify the project entry and shall not exceed on any one side an area of 54 square feet (name and logo only) with a support area not to exceed 155 square feet, nor shall the sign exceed 23 feet in height. Letter type styles and ~ colors shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. Major entry monumentation signage shall be limited to the project name only and located at major entry points. (b) Planning Area 2 Only: Regional center monumentation signage shall be limited to one major perimeter site edge or corner provided, however, that no more than one (1) regional center monumentation sign with a maximum height of twelve feet (12'-0") may be erected pursuant to approval by [he Planning Commission. (c) Maximum tenant sign area for Minor Entry Monumentation (with tenant listings) shall be equal for each tenant and shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet with a total tenant signage area not to exceed i one hundred (100) squaze feet, nor shall the sign exceed twenty three (23) feet in height. Tenant listings shall be at the discretion of the property developer with approval by the City. Secondary tenants shall be defined as businesses with less than 20,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Colors and Letter type styles shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Development Plan Review t process. Freestanding monument signs shall have a minimum separation of two hundred feet (200'). , ' (2) Retail Commercial Buildinc Identification Siena¢e (a) The surface area of building identification signage for anchor tenants shall not exceed ten percent (] 0%) of the surface area of the front and side walls of the building. Maximum letter height shall not excced five feet (5') unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. , (b) The surface area of building identification signage for anchor tenants shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the rear face of the building. Maximum letter height shall not exceed five feet (5') II[-6l (b) Fully illuminated sign cans for office and institutional use signage shall not be permitted, although signage may be illuminated by halo lit individual letters, concealed ground level flood lights, or back cut letter signs in a metal can. Hotel uses may utilize fully illuminated sign cans. " (c) $ignage for building addresses shall be provided on every main building, preferably as close to the main entrance as possible, Numerals shall be no larger than twelve inches ' (12'~ and no smaller than eight inches (8'~ in height. In no event shall the numerals appear to be the dominant graphic device on the fagade of any building. (4) Leasine_ Temporary and Directional Si ng aee (a) Leasing, temporary, and future facilities signage shall be permitted provided the maximum area does not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet, nor shall the height of the sign exceed eight feet (8`) above finished grade. (b) Multiple tenant directory signs and parking directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed forty (40) square feet or six feet (6') in height (c) Temporary signs are those signs which advertise ar promote a special event, such as an opening, or offering of a new product or service and are easily removed. Temporary window signs are allowed provided they meet the following criteria: • Sign graphics of any nature painted directly on a window shall not be considered a temporary window sign. • A window sign advertising or promoting any product or service offered on a regular basis or at a regular price shall not be considered a temporary window sign. • Temporary window signs shall not be illuminated, shall be limited to twelve percent (12%) of the tenant's storefront glass area, and shall be displayed no more than fourteen (14) days. • Flashing or moving signage is prohibited. (d) Site Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, .however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed seventy eight (78) square feet with an overall height not exceeding five (5) feet-above finish grade. Secondary Site Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed thirty three (33) square fee[ with an overall height not exceeding five (5) feet above finish grade. . III-63 Freestanding Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed six (6) square feet per face (with no more than four faces) with an overall height of the support not exceeding eleven (l t) feet above finish grade. Wall Mounted Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed six (6) square feet per face (with no more than two faces) with an overall height of the mounting location not exceeding eleven (I 1) feet above finish grade. RI-63 a E. SIGNAGE GUIDELINES This section does not apply to the malt and mall entry monument signs, refer to mall sign program. Signage is an important element contributing to the identity of Temecula Regional Center. The following guidelines are intended to produce a consistent Signage design that reinforces the collective image of Temecula Regional Center as a superior retail and business location, while maintaining opportunities for individual identity of each parcel. All signs shall be designed and constructed in conformance with these guidelines. Signage design as well as location, size and number of signs shall be subject to review and approval by City of Temecula for conformance to these guidelines. This will be done in conjunction with development plan submittals for individual projects. 1. Commercial Core Siena¢e The commercial core will become a significant landmazk for Temecula and Riverside County; the Signage shall, therefore, reinforce this landmazk image. Many different levels of Signage are required for a commercial core, each part of a cohesive graphics program. The following types of Signage are allowed: a. Major Site Identity Sign This type of sign may be part of a freestanding architectural element. Its chief objective is to identify the center as a whole from as far away as possible. Distinctive graphics, materials, colors and lighting devices shall be used to incorporate this sign into the overall design theme of the Center. This sign shall particularly be read from Ynez, Margarita, Overland and Winchester Roads. Only anchor tenants and project name shall be identified on this Signage element. b. Primary Entrance Sign Identifiesprimary project driveway entrances, includes project name and logo symbol. 2. Retail Commercial Siena¢e a. Primary Tenant Monolith (refer to Figure 27K) Identifies anchor tenants. Signs of this type shall be limited to major and minor entry points. Internally illuminated sign structure with pierced typography. Tenant identity must fit within graphic area as specified on Figure 27K. Sign azea per tenant is forty two {42) square feet. .Anchor tenant letter type and colors may be allowed, subject to approval by the City. -Total Signage area not to exceed sixty eight (68) square feet. fV-55 Building signs are limited to one sign per street frontage. Either a building mounted sign or a ground level monument sign may be used on the same street, but not both. d. Ground-Floor Commercial Tenants and Restaurants This wall sign type is reserved for commercial tenants and restaurants requiring special ground floor recognition. Special signing treatments on entrance awnings or canopies are allowed. 4. Theaters and~ial Event Facilities Identification and program information for theaters and special event facilities may be provided by theater monuments and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displayidg the name of the theater, auditorium; hotel or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include changeable section accommodations program information. These signs may be either attached directly to the building or erected as freestanding signs. These signs shall .not extend above the height of the predominant roofline of the building if attached directly to the building. Freestanding signs cannot exceed a maximum of twenty three (23) in height. These signs may be illuminated internally; however, the permanent portion must have an opaque background, with only the message portion illuminated, and set up for changeable letters. 5'. Building Address Building address numbers shall be displayed on every building at or as close as possible to the main entrance. The numerals shall face the street, access the road or Hte approach walkway, as necessary. The address numbers may be non-illuminated and of a material and form consistent with-other building identfication signing sued on the same stmcture or with materials listed in previous sections. Number height shall be no lazger than 12" and no smaller than 8". The numbers may not appeaz to be the dominant graphic device of the fagade of any building. 6. Vehicular and Pedestrian Signs Vehiculaz and pedestrian signs provide information, directions and regulations for exterior parking and circulation on site. To keep their number to a minimum, vehiculaz and pedestrian signs shall be placed only where information is required. The use of symbols to reinforce information (such as no parking, loading zone and handicapped pazking) is encouraged. Wording shall be kept to a minimum. The signs may be constructed of aluminum, fiberglass, stone or concrete. Stucco is an unacceptable material Colors foz the sign shall harmonize with project architectural colors and include white. Color, style and Letter height of all copy on the same sign shall be coordinated and consistent with building design. All copy will besilk-screen painted or vinyl die cut. Height r IV-66 SIGN PROGRAM G:\Planning\2008\PA08-0081 Promenade Mall SPA\Planning\PC Staff Report.doc 9 W ~ _° ,1 W ~ ;4° c F ^ Q a Y m o '~~' a sp€pa /^ a OQ ~ ~ J 1 BS~ Z ~ v ~ 1 U O a ~ [~ oo ga= -" W ~ N } O pa . W ~ ~ a ~ N }' $~s~ o ~ 0 Ow ~~~ ~ .. U° s€sa F z ~ ~ C~ ¢ N° Tym d N ~ m ~W ~o y~'^Y '^ £_.. p N^PO oE~3 ^ r p ==~paN d d N P N ~L Td EPNN •9 « m UdQPP q 9 oUU?a p a z L a P x •: p a ~ v m Zvi PLL V « N C ..Y 7NONm m CX JO~~ ..y p~n0 V VL~00 ~.y~c -a - dpN NON YYV .-VI N m F" ` E W ~P.p d p' O LStl]~P O~ a F p j s- 8 o ">~ v'"~ , ; ~~ a 0 • N Y r '~ Q ~ ..p E ~.~ m U A N N qy+ ~ N CNp w~ E r _ V v utm LL n v A~ eac F ~ 3 ~ yQ S m a ~9 i E o ' z E x~ o ~ ~ a E= V ~ p p L>, E o «_ a gY d~ U P S [sb V) ~ 9~yo ag o L r m F v0 V p LL o GY S 1 ~ • ` ([ R: I,: s i i; ~ ~ ~; ## g i1 p i ~~~ r .e' r" F , - j ~ * , r. ,` t `. S ~~ Z ° 5 tl _ b ~b C ~ _ , F,, o F` ~5` ' ~rz ° o i i G {4 ~ w; ~ a 3 ° g„`. J l N II P` . f ~ a j4 z G 4, z ~~. a ~ ~. ~ C C "'. 1~ G .G ~ .~ E ? E a s i _ sf ~ e ~ t~ ~ s G t~ ~ i ~3 S ~ _ 5 9 ° ,~ frF ~ 3 _ ~ ~= fd y ~ ' ~~ r r 4 :C ~ G :'G y, W W ~~ f~ o ° x C t C G d b ~ F $~ 5 °° 3 ~ a ~G '. ~ C s ~ C -C ~ 4W tm ~ C ~ _= b ~.~ W - c ~ . ~ ~ ~ . m ~ ~ ~ E 5 z~ ~ ~ C ~ F ,~ „ ~ ~ o o ~ C ~ _. ~ iL5 ° i E ~ ... s. .. 5 F 3 t 5 'S ~ ~ ~ £ c r _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . i ~ ~ 's o ~` ~F. ? ~ ° k .z F - - 4 Z E ~' ° s o s 3 x 3 3 i 3 3 3 -3 ° i 3 v '3 1 3 v 3 3 3 ~3 ° 3 ~ 3 3" v 3 `s 3 3 ~3 _ BF r • - '$Q' ~ ~~ Fd ~ $d ~. l: i T a y ~:... {Ya'~ z b yi o z ,ya z EE O _ ~~~~nn m _ W ~ p F il t: ~ Fc'.. 5 d ~ ti i ~ :. ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 o y ~~. F a o _~ ~.~ C H z ~ ~ d 3 ~ .F ~~ F C 5 C C c ~~ ° i E _ ° ~ o t ~ ~',s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ o a a a . j 1 z .' Q ~ N ' ! r~ ~ W . , .. m m ° ~ o ~ E c ' a Z. e =sx ~_ e S t U N N Q ~T C z z o O U w , N 2 Z 2 O n O D 0 O p U w 2 2 Q O O 2 ~~ °E£ •~M 6 ~ c p $ .~' O 4 ~E§ E g„ e E~x fig[ E mY4 3~a A ~~ 's~ ao ~s ~~ $ = as o~ g e a ~ ~ P ° ~ p $ ~~~ a x_ o o v o `g~pp v E o a ~ y~y a 3 4 o f ~ E~ ~ ~ EE ,~ ~,1i g22 tl~ c 6 ~E~ '850 L E ~ 9 Ex ffi~~~~° E~~ s L eo~gmq 8'~ x 2 ° E e Q N E 6 9 Q s~ g ~ C a E ~3 Ey° sv" E S '?~ Y e i~ `J4 .y 5 g y ~ x t w r n { i ~ a~ .O ~ S v ~ L_ ~ m bq_ p¢q OI 1 9 u ° ~ by ~ 9x o ° 9r ~ = y ~ d _ xa m3 ~ h _ ~ ..^ ~ ,m ~ ° w ~~ M c° C ° a ` ~~ ~ s C ,~ ~~ ~ Y m '~ ~ ~~ ~r~ @ S ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 3~ 3 °m o ~? ~ ~~ a ~ pp ~~ 6 m ~ ."ce ~~ ~j~ S '$g n ~~0 9 B ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~. B n ~~ ~9~ ., 9 ~ s~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~- ' 0 3£~ o 0 0.~ 6 ~~ ~ p '= .9 ~9 g ~ ~ e E y ~ ~.',2 Rio ~7~ ° ~' '~°= ~ '~6~ ~ U ~ ~ ~tl c~ X09 '0 e sa ~.~r 6fi~ ~ .~ 5~~ E ~ C V c a p ~ E p~' ~ 'Eb ~ ~ 3.~ ~ 6 ~ ~'^"o ~ ~ ~O ~ 8 ~ .E 6~ ~~ a v u ~ 5 o Y$~ o~ G N a ~ a C V ~ 3 ~ € e$ fi ~ ~ o 0 0 ~ o '~E ~-3 S a ~Mn ~~ 9S ~-96 5a8 ° ~ SS ~4 ffim ~~ ~g33a~ OI °~"$ s ~L i-~ .~ U c N +~ c c H >t i o ~E w= ~~ z 0 o w 00 ~_ ~~ ~s v z Yp ?^3 :f~ 85~ o c° Z ° `-6PF ~ tse p €Y~ i Pg~ E 3~a ' 1 1 ~ ] '. i 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ I 1 I I a ~ ` Z ~ u S $ ~ ~ B s a e s ., s $ 6 a & '~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ o aZ ~ s ~~~ ~ o ~99~K C ~ ~ ~g $~Sd ~ E~ 3 ~ dry% ~9 ~ ~6 pp~~ y~~~ Cy € a 59~ a°E~~~~~ c g.@g aSS :a ao ADO .. B y'g° e 5 Soo ~~y~ .g 6 ~~E9 ° u2E~~S °e 'C a e2 g9aE6E~ ~ ~6 ~a~ 3 ~ ~~S5M .a ~ o E a ~ o g' 6 a~ ~ 6 a ~ ~.M 6 ~ -° E.~ ~' '~ E ~ S a ~, ° c ~ .... .. ~ .. .... u ....... u o 5 ... 3' e g ... a '~ ~ .. . ~ ~ ~ g ~~ ~ ~~ e a _ ~ ~~ e g ~~ ~ ~~ g 3 ~ ~ s ° s ~ ~ ~e~ ~ e a ~~ ~~ y a '9 a '~ ~ 4 I a~ °~qq~r e ~ d~ ~ tl .€; 6~E~ 3 c o s v b~ .~ o ~ ,g g `° -~~ ~ ES.~ .~ E `~~ a 0~ 6$tl~~6 ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~v ~sgg~~~ 3~~ 9 E E 6 `'~ ~a69 gg~ ~xvq v~ a ~ C .° c~ °P~6'b~ g~S ~ o .ti ~~ c o. a°O~ ~ ~+~E ~sS a 'd ~' s ~~ ~ S .~ ~ g ~ E c ° ~ n ~ E'~ ~ E c '0 ~$S gg 6 0 `7 'E ~ ' .~ . 8~$a5 ~ ~ $ ~ E-7~ S .C V"z~~ a'g~ ~~ ~~a~E ~$~ 9 5~g ~x 693~e HE~~ ° do» 9~% 'e ~ ~~'~m a,.g° ~ ~°E 5v '~G9`a~9~° .~.3~ ~E 6B° .e ~.S Ea'E~o Sao 41f 8° a.Y~" ~t'~§J a~as ~~ 5r~ ~ yy~o ee~~Co- ~~Ege ~~„c."s° p~ 9 y ~ ~ 5 2~ ~ m~~ E~ ~5 S UY~ Z~E<3~-~ ~'~n ~^ ~a:~ a ~~~~~E6~W as pEn~ 33Eo 5 0 0 ~.o sv 6F.~' &y9~~ y E ~~ ~~.~~eao.@Q°~ a _.h° 8.~g5~a" g~'ygo3~ ss.~~'_6g~ ~'°a~".y~P ~E'¢~G6.'~a¢¢~eg~E ~ 'E`~~srv°~~}~~'~E 3i~E o~°c ° E FSC `O ypZ ~5~~3~~ O a tl g b ~ ~ D ~ U ~y 3 E _J v~ a g G'B CQia ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ 3 ~ G C.6 beg s ~ » ®~~ ~= ~~.~3~~A °o~s v a ~ ~ ~ ~~L. o ~~~e~'~ E`'g~es3fy ?z3~HC~W ~~.€nLL ~~E~~'~° $ e~ o~~c ~~~~-m~m~°E~ €~ x~aa ~^~ aGa.6.E9 e 6 s as ~ C 5 65 ~ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ) ~ > > ) ) ~ ~ ~ ) r 1 L _~ ~-+ C C i i i o o E w ~ i i z o 0 a w O o V w ~ 2 ~ o o z agF sF~ c 8 6F 6 q a: € f :~~ ~ ~F€ 3 iyF 8 .,a e 6 "e / pp~ $ S6 9~ o ~? ti ~.d ~ W= rs ~~ s d sa ~ a ~~ m ggds be ~ W ~y ~ m ~~~ o~ y „e ~~8 ~ .~ ~ d ~~ ~~ r m~~~~' Y ~a~®s s~ o m E .. ~~ ~ n~ o e z ~$~~~~~ W ... ... F m N S o o °o ~~ ~ ~ ~~ _~ n ~~ ~ ad $ ~ ~ ~ ~~ s ~ z~ ;~9°9 ~ o~ 2E 3 ® ~~ 8~ ~ ~ a ~~ ~tl ~~ $ &,. ~ ~ ~ ~~ ° $ a g ~ ~ ~~ ~n ~ ~ 6 a B {`` ~ $`o s vn 6 3 a ~~~ 8 c ~~++ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ a E~~E Q~g ~ ~E E ~$~ W ~~~ ~ e ~ 8 0° ~s ~,Y ~ v a 1 W ~B~ .~~6 ~' ee -~~ ~ 0 3 P~ - e 5 3~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ffi o ~ III ~ ~ ~ Ya V E p ,., y ^g, ¢ ~ ~ Yu 3 ~ 8 E B - i ,• ~ a 2 b m J ~ a~ 0 5 s E 6 a H P~ a ~° 2 g 0.' ~ E~ ~ q e- ~ ~~~ r" ~ a 3 rs m" a~ v F`a N ,~ o \n ~3 o d a E x W L 07 N d 9 m 00 .+ c c F 0 N N 5 6 a s E ~ 6 .~ ~ ~ 2 Z d ~ ~ G s ~ p 8 A ~' s~ s E rs e s ~ ~ 8 y ~ g n ~ v~ ~ .g ~ Z o n" Y ~ S ~' L ~ E ~~~ ~ ~ 2~ a ~a~$ u~p $.y„ ~~~V ~~~ a~ a~9eo~ .~ ~EC ~ 5 "pfd 23 C~cE Cd g~3 °°.~ "~P.p~p~G3 ~.~N4Y is SfO VI ~.~~a 0.'~G~a~' ~an u .~ Y .~ C N y+ C C z a ~ u' w a i i z o 0 oW 0 0 u w z i ~ o a= g n' sg? '- 665 e f q~: ~ F3F $ 8 aao a ~; },r t ~a ;~. .:a r ~"` ~ 3 'j• //V if m a E W x W L _0 A L O 6 C W C F N cJJY '=^OFFOS~ N L .~ U c c m c H 2 ~ OFj i ': i i z V ~ O O ~ O O p U' w Z i ~o o~ i- FEa ogP a~% e€e t~ iii %s 9E Ens ~°e F~ ~iZ pa c i 2 i E 8 e 5 8 N d Z d 9 7 C A m D d W W L m N d L d N N S ~~ m m ~~ ~a b a~ ~~ ~ ~~ o ~~ S; v _ Qg ~ L ~ 5 °~n C E "~so ~~~'~ V ..... b1 M N N 6 ~ ~ C ~ r o s "s $ B~ ~ ~ ~8 ~ ~ .~~ E 9 ~ a $~ E g C ~~~ o.~ aII~ nz Ba ~~~ ~s ~9~s~ ~~~~ ~E e"aa ~~~~s~ tl aEE~~ ~.g .. s ~fi° ~.~ ~yy g~ ~• ~ 8 S ~ ~~ '~ ~y 9 ~ ° 6 a ~,a E c 9 ~ a e ~ e 8 c ~ g 3 ~P~~ ~ 9 g~ .u aye ~ ~BQa ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~~a a° v~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ o. c w° ° E ti ° ~~ a ~2 -~ ~~~~ ~ '2 °~ ~ 5s ~';; ~ ~ .g a @ 2 - W E ~ ~ ° ~~ ~.5 ° 6 '~~ ea ~ ~g ~<~~ a s ~~ vz~~~s ~v~ 6~ ~~es~~s .~~ s 'sas5s F~ E'==A3cnA o3.~ ~,J qII ° ~ o .3 j ~ P E `~ _ ~ g ~,i ~ a, (n ~o.9 `L CoE cs~ ~y~ gr.n ~° .9O °p~Z x~.~a d~.9 ~.Ls' ~ 5 n ° z ~`` 5 "' ° ~ G 8 ~~ o sfB~iPs_tlo ~~`B `o ~a.PS ga ~'c 'g oe~~~.'nE~a~95 T~5 ~"E.~ "s°~2~z~$Poov ~~~89 ~.~s3 'g F` E ~.~~3~~~~'a a.~~F=do.S a P g. .. .. 0 a'n B .o 94 ~o 3 ~~ ~~ "o~ °~E P g ~~ ~~ ~~` s$ S ~ B ~ co B ~~o w ~' ~~s z^Zs ~E~Ya ~~ffi~ ~ '_ ~ .~ .~ ~ ~ s ~~ a 4 ~~eey 9 ~ Ss~ ~¢ ~ ~2~ S- ~'v 3~ ~ ~~ 9k .~' ~~Zgg a ? ~ ~ m' ° ~ 0 0 ~ 9 E ~ Xo E g°~ ~ ~ E ~~ ~~' X88 ~`~ ~ '~ ~ 6 °~~~ -~E~~s ~~x~ ;~~~~ ~~ g~~~~ E~~~ ~~~ mfg o~°.~ 'a a~~ .ego .aG ~~'~ ;~~~? ~~ ~ ~ag~d ~~~ a m9~~ Ws"g ~9P ~~-g~ ~~~o ~~~~ ~~ ~- ~~ B ~~ o~ 3~$_ ~E B~ a~ s~ 9~ 8~ B S~ e~~ Y S.v~. .,~€3sz ,~ e~aa ~E9~Q~~`°38o Q~'2 .~ya ~95~~ gg ~ ~~gg 5~ ~~ E' E ~ ~ ~ -~ E $ ~ d ~ 3 3 6 S ~ E E 8 .~ ~ z ? ~" 9 ~P ~§ ~.5 z g s e~ ~~.~ pp~$~ 4yo a.~ Bag$s P$~ a~'ray Boa ~ ~ ~ ° ~.~~ 9 n o E 3'a s ~~5 :P~a y3~i 9~ oE~vE ~a ~~~_ ~ES.~ ~g4 B "°.~ ~ ~ ~ S pEp ~ S ~ B E~36 G~ d e &< ~~ Y n v.e" ~ a ~~°sso~s9 p ~~ c~`~ 9 E ~ y 6 ~ ~c;y§ga.~ c~o.q~ .~ 'z 'S bb°~I~il¢c 1-UL u ~ ~ .. ... a ... 5 E :7 F` cg I 6 -gad C ~~~s ~" ~¢~~ ~~~ ~`~~,~~ ~ s w9 A' ~ ~gss ~ s~~P ~ ~g~g 2 ~~~ a 8 ~~_~.~ ~~~~ ~ am~B ~ ~ .~~ .~ ~5~g$~ ~~tl~tl~p2ga ~a.7 G5° ~ A ~n "o s s~ n ~~ ~ aa~ ~ Ea~~ ss s~ ~~~s~ ~ aA cs'~~ a ~L U C N C t6 c H i o ~G W° i i ~~ 0 o w 0 0 u z z ~ ~ o o z ~~ zag '~i $4 e ~z$ X65 eo; {€ M8 p~o Yc~ €ss a°o 0 C e d W c or N z W z F W Q to O V ~. a a a N N ~J ~~ z ~ m a a ~ ~ H ~^ ~ ~ ~ 9 f 5~~~ E g ~~^ ~ W S a 9°~ ~ $ "s a ~.~ ~ E~ Eog~ ~`~^ ~.~ee m g.~§ c ~, Qso & E~°s ~ 5~.9~ ~ a ~~ a~ ~ ° E =.~~: ~ 5 ~i'v C.~ C ~ ~'tl ~ E=ss 'gD ~~ ~.~z~o °,_~g~ "~~ ain~a ~F~v`%n~a . ~. . a s v ~, B 5~ ~ ~ ~~ 6 ~ aa S ~ '~ g 3 9 t" a tl ~ dl ~ $ ~a ~ ~~ $ S 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ y c ~ ~ ~ '~ ,C ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ W .° ~ § ~ ~ E 3 ~ ~ 8 UHF 8 °i 9 ~~ ~ „cS m @ ~ gy g ~ .°s ~~ d -~ 8~ a~ ~ a c ~ ~ ~ v H a 2~° d a ~ s ~~" a ~ ~ g E 0 a Y a 9'~9a° ~ 8 ~s ~ ~a ~~ ~~ ~ o 4+~$ 5 .~ .6 9S a" Y a Y ~' ~~a .~ ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ^ ~ m ~ ~y ~ P ~ ~ ~ a `gy ~ n °Ho~~s~~'~°5~ ~ c~z 'S '~ g.6 .~s~o ~,~ "o~°~E~Ph $~5u~ ~~ o~ as ~a.Y ~~_~ ~~ mo 6 o~~' ~: ~~ ~s m~o ~6 gSd ~~ ~~ ~~ ~sg .~~ .~ ~-+ .L U c N ++ C C r i i O o E w ~~ z o O oW 0 0 ~ z z i ~s a: s fag rgi °a ~~ 2~N mF~ dzE 4~ E f~i pofi a8~ t$a C 8 9 1 1 1 f ! .Q ~T C N C C H .9-.l z z a oG z ~ i i i o u o ~ 0 0 0 u w z i ~ o v z p3o cE; s?' =4~ _ 8 0~ od wE6 ~ `2£ S~= Z k~ 8 y= '; €~3 P~~ E aY- g a.e B V ~~ ~~F ~_ ~~ F ~ r } ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ '. ~~ o,. ~ ~~ t ~~ LLl ~\i 1 ~Q \-~Cy ,' - `- A ~~ ~~IH ~~~~ i~iy' / \a ^ ~ .+ \ - _ X13 ' -- ~ „V^ . ~.r~1~IL ~ N 1 y t doa -L~~- ;}'.~~~ h~~~ ~~Ililll~'fi II ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 wa w~ r .~ ~. - - ,-,, I '- ~ ... _ ~ L---~-- I ~~~~`;© -~~ p~a> i ~, .,o ~~ .. ~ ~_I I I iill~illl. ~ ~_ 47 ' ~ N ~ ~ U ~ \// \\ u } / Q m r r / ~ a=~W / °_° n ° . \~~^ / /~ 4io< ~~' i~rF / W£F ', 0 .~, U J C N C O .~ U 4= Y ~-+ (6 C >_ i o ~ V W r Z Z i O u O o w 0 0 u w ~~ i ~ o o~ Fac ~$2 a .~ BQ~ o Sef E '~~ p '~~ 's ?Y[ E mY4 ai9 8 a>> O _T U O~ ~I 4 a w c5 N C .~ U .~ C ~_ C L O S~ L T'Z i O ~ V Z ~ F v Z_ 2 Z ~ ~ Q O O ~ O O p U' w 2 Z O O 2 ~~ YEo a~E -~N foF 0 E P~ e C p° i €ea yi$ E :i a~e B i i i i o oo~~ o o I ~ O li ' ~ 0 .~, m u .~ c .~ c H 0 >~ ~o o G i p .w-G z z i O u a o ~ o o a V w 2 2 O O 2 f~ FEa a[p aFg ~~ 9 6°5 o¢ LpE E :„9 q 3 5~P o ~ ?€i E aY3 eta N CN C V L 3 w Z C7 W Z c 0 .~, U .~ C N ~_ ~-+ C C F- L O .~ i o a E i a ~ C z z i o u c o ~ a 0 0 u w z i ~ o a z cge opt ~u 86F ~e~ m o of e Y dye f F{e p 29 a` ~ +~i ~: € v Fg~ E a ~a3v 3aa 3` gE8 0 .~, U O J C N i N N ++ N >t i o ~ G wa ~~ z i i o u z 0 0 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z 7` EEC aF; ~E= £~N _ ¢ES d¢ o y? i i :Ne p _9£ i i ~ °- 4os B .s €~9 8 as; e -~- -.4: ~ ®' ~ ~:_ =b_ $; y i (-' ,~'~ i~ ,~ ~, ~. n / ~ i / ,_ ;,I -" ~_ ~= ~ ~= ~_ ~- =_ ~,,_ ,- ~- i ~- i i k I 1 ~ fi fY '- m m v - a 9 0 O O Z 0 .~, U O J C N (6 >_ N C O .~ c f0 ~- W .~ ++ N ~' 1 2 Z O 0 i s i- G z_ z z u u "W a 0 0 a o u W z i ~ o o z F= ?tea eEp nF~ ~~ _ em oY m 0 L: ~ E 4„ ¢ ~ :P¢ 3 i'a g has pog E :- e3 336 B .. `~,. . c 0 .y U O J C _~ .~ i-~ Q~ i O O U w , N Z 2 2 ~ H O O O O p V w Z Z c4 O ~ 2 Y~ ?88 c Fr l~p .H a(`e 0 L7~ f aNe p c$~ s %~ s Ys~ E :- a F° B N O)L rnNA o U, v in vim vvz i ~~~ ~ N N ~ I/. _~ CZ~ ran =i z O Q U O J z Y qg~ p7 ~... ... _... I' ~ -. ~ ; I ~ ~ i aij ~.i ~, b °J ~ 1 F ~ ~ ~ i y i m I: C ~ o. ~ ~ _ _ __ I o ~~ F~ I I ~~./ ~~ i ~~~ ' ''1 I I I 'I I ''' -'-~, , ~) ~ ` \ i I ~) ~ t ,iii '~~,~ ~ ~ P W _._ ~ ~~~ ' Vi (A RI ~ V Z ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ 0 .~ u O J C .~ ++ 0 t~ ~o o G w ~ i o 0 0 0 0 0 u w __ ~s O Z FEg 065 - ~¢ m 0 ;; $~£ 2 Epy E 3Fo 9 l v" ~, z ~ i U ~ ~ ~ w Z A : nnD R RI fRl A - N VI l~ - m C Z ~ a; ~ .~ a; :o ' n r `;m ~~ / / G J' 'yj ~ c'G~F` ~ o oy ~ ~P < t" 2 - ~+ F~ ~ t2 fA < ~~ \ A~O f~~ ~f ~'.. +~ ~~ `~!~ L C .~ (6 U O J C N .~ N 0 N N > i i o o `z ~ i i z o u ~ o 0 0 0 0 z ~ w z i ~ o o z Y= F33 ;Fx `EC :Fg _' fi §a o FE° SE ~ f s%fr p sad 5 E`ss i°$ E Fqq $ dFY rc a~o B ~~ ~~,~ ~.: ,; ,. 0 .Y V J C .~ ~--~ 0 i-~ N >t za O U 2 Q 2 2 - O U s Q O a o O o u w z i u4 0 o z Y` Pa~ cF< aEE :E~ ~•ud S Sg _ eoa m O S~~ f :5~ p :~4 L F`gi E ~sy S `< ~'> B "~ _ j I !1 I ~~ ~~ 1 1' I I N^~ ~Nm I ~~~ ~ ~i n ~ n ~ ~ v®~ ~ I I N i ~„ ~~ w 1 I I~ ~. i _.,>.~ ' ~ i ~~_ Z O v O z X w c 0 .~ U O J C N .~ N N N >~ io O F 2 ~ 2 2 i D U ~ o O a a O Z V w 2 2 O o z 3~ E3a ep~ z~~ eso ~$ o" wF[ i :Ci ~ gN F ~Ff 3 .~a s ~~~ E ~~y g 'a P a 0 l i 1 t ~ 1 i 1 1 A~ l ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~' .... . i Z O Q U O ~w z - - -~7 ~7 r7r~77~~7TTT Q V O Q Z ~71~L11 0 .~, U O J C ~_ N .~ ~-+ N N ~+ N ;_ z o °G W'= i i z o u rc 0 0 0 0 0 u w z i ~ o a z i~ ?~d eE2 eg£ -~6 FoE o" .p; £ X65 p ~~ 3 °&o z'L ~~~ mjj rc E.$ 8 T ~v aye 9 1 1 1 ~ 1 ) ) ) ) 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 .,- ~~ i' . i t7 Z t- , X w c d C O .~ U O J C N (6 ~-+ N 0 N ~+ N >i i o ~ u w c r ~ z z z ~ u o O 0 o "' i u w z i ~ a v z Y EEg S R SSE 2:~ _ Foy o° Est ~ E °r3 § 2 F4 ; EoL F~~ 8 dY4 ~ a~a B 1 1 i ~ ~ c 0 .Y V O J C N .~ N C O ~N C Q X W .~ ++ N ~_ z o a E i ~ i i i o ~ rc a o a ~ 0 0 ~ w z ~ 3 ~ ~ o o z 3= Faa aF =~~ _ ~o° Lx~ E :N9 F1 `S ; iE Eta ~°O E F`g `= d4 8 '<,° 1 1 0 .~, U O J C _~ N .~ +~ N C O .y Q K W .~ d z o o E w rc . C z z z ~ u a N o 0 c 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z ?~8 :£! Pg E ~~ 6g _ •~- o Sp. Z PM § p Sy£ i Ee`> =a o [°} E F`q~ s3B 9~a B ^91 ~ - -'-- 1 ~~~~~ e i ~ '~'; ~ i _ __ _~ ~' ~~~ ~;......i .. 0 .~, U O J C N .~ +-~ N C 0 .y C (p Q.. K W .~ ~+ N >t i o o E i rc i 2 V U p ~ O O p U' w ~ ~ 4a O o z Y~ 4Ea cF; ~FP afi u 865 $ op m o Yi ~ `z: a%~ p _ i [s R bS ~ _ gE4 a3a A l ~' '~ f [,] ~, ~p ,('yam, I ~" ' ~ ~~ ,}: nu 'Y' t IIa L.~ tt C~ n j .. `, I r.,r'~1 C a. C O .~ ra U O J c N .~ +~ N C O .~ C to Q x w .~ .~ a, > i i o o~ i ~ i i i o o ~ 0 0 ~ w z i o o z 8= PEo sei :F7 .. Lxa Q m+ ~ S~€ f .58 p _ 3 ~~o f°3 v ?Pi E ~4 8 °a P e A is ,. .- w ~~ I' ' I ~ 1 C C O .~ U O J C _~ N .~ N C 0 ~N C f0 Q K W .~ r i 0 ~E w ~ . C z z i o u a 0 0 o a u w z i ~ o o z 7= FEo :F; ~E~ -~~ _ Ebo m~b ~ £~~ £ ~~ N p ~F ti~-= ~"3 E F~~ u ~~ 9 1 i 1 ~ _~ 0 .~ v 0 J C to .~ N C .~ K W .~ ++ N ~' ~_ z o o G w p z z z u o ~ o a a u w z i a o o z $- EEE :Fx vY ~' ~ •: _ :oB - 0 ~z° `x `s f ~~ ~ ~ =~ z 2Ya FiI E ii~ 33a _ -_ ,~~ I ;~_ ~I { • t I ® •' i i .r .~ , , ~-- ~~1 „ a ' ~~@. I. ~ ': is .. , ~ ~ ; ~ _ ~ ` t j~~ i i ~ i -... ~ '}cE.i ~- - -- J ` _. i _~ - - ~- i E _ _ av a8 d$~ 'ov vE a= x 3"v~=a of"-' `-°~~ E~ _~' _ ~ a~ E~E4 ~ _i 3 _ ~ aPE ~o _ oG=_ Eo 'cam Eo _ _ _ _ _ _ °P~- Em - of 2D +vm _uo m- a~mEig~QO;,i',9 C-~~ ~ id VE Fo SL ~Ed~fr~v~E~-~a~a~~~2~m~.a_~~~E~ o®a 0 a o LL M A ~ ~ L) U W Q 5 U Z ~ ~ gµr~i^ '~'S. S, '}~Sf~ 3 a O W w >`~ w ~ - _ a" o ~ o w LL 1 W K ~ Q a ~ ~ d Z vi Q .. d f ~ ~~ 0 ~ d M ~~ JIn Q a o a~ ~~~ ® O J o ~ ~ ~. I~ 4 - ~# .~. a ~ ~_ O ~ .f-.E .0-.E ,,.. .6".t 1 .9-.E -B-Z 11 ~L j~ v 0 .~ m c N c c~ C w 0 r Q ~_ _~ 0 w= ~~ __ =o o~ 0 00 ~w ~~ ~s 9~ ?sa 'Yz ;% po ~? z ~% i$ zev ?Y~ eYY aP 0 f 2 E 8 e a~ ~ E _ m_ E ~ ° a ~a -- ~ o:,9a g mE ~EV~ Cc b E ~ ; u5 $ o`3E~ a5 Sm E_ ~ aEa _ t y~ o y O ~ _ __ o C ~ ~ E _ ': Y ~ . i o. ; _~E E 4 =~= __ 6CU c _ E _ _ w ~a ~E arv un rv m3 n~G arv_enumouv a O O 3 Y E O 0 m W o a ~ a , m > a m o ~o ~ r :~. E,., t !,• . ~- llyw.q~ry) =.t i'f. Y _ ~ ~, o-.Z~ ~ G~ :, ' .Y ss r li t . ~,. ~ ~~ f q ~ '~ ~ ~~ ' '~ K s - i t x ' 4t' s '4¢ a'^~ , e E ~r `~'ga' {{,, s t „a t ~- 'r ~~~ ~ ~ "~~ ~ a- O rG . Q LL 4~ ~ W "i;` L` ~•~ LL VI ~ j^ A W J 1- Z .~~ W ~ ~ J~^° U ~ vr w ~ ~ ...,,, . _.~ O I ~ a a a Li d m N m ~ J O ° O Oe ~ N J N 0 .~ c ccO ^C W U c O rn N N a i o o E wp ~~ ~~ i o a 0 o a 0 0 u w Z ~s o~ 4` 43a o~p ~F eag ~a zs sfia F~ 4 ~r3 Fyn ' •F a ~o f 3 E 8 B ~o = _ d z v o v E _- -_ -~s°=~za° - _ ~= E E sr m=°v-v~9c zr mE~ ~- Q - E_ m - - Aa - 9~€ 3Em ~3 A o ~;~ ~ _ -- ~ R _ = _d t ' s EE V 5 ; ~ of a ° aE fi i~ E~ 2 o$Va a o r v m f o2 -_ 3 s < i E ~^ q i v m m ~ a L E u~ - mrnO _ c m `m-P°~<q6 cc ~ mE W o A « .. .. « a m ~ ` AE ° a,~.v `E3 E O umEO i~E3 E~m O O9 »~3 :d9 m~ o _ E ~ oE EEV oa_oT e o- - vEV A`a x ~~E «aa -u5 rvr ° o ~ ~urv arv nrv cnn _ cnmmv=.n m..o m~, o 3 ~ amu« ~ o o ® ® ~. - q >a p~ ~ O .9".5 O W $i O e~T 11** i i~5 iGs ;{tp ; 1] ~ O O Q t.. ~~® ® ~ ~ i. _.1~Y w Y ~.. :~ Q Ae _ _ .. ~~ _ .[-.E w Q ~ V w Q .a.t LL } 8- S _ ~ . . V Z I O ~ W 1 F Z .0-.EZ O ~ O w ~ ~ - 4 ~ ~ I j Q a ~I i v ^ ~ ~ ~o >a O Q - i~ ~ o- _ J O - ~ i fN ~N ` e ~V O,O 1-m ~v~ s S .~ Q t6 Y 0 w 0 c M Q ~_ ~ F O ~ w 2_ 2 2 ~ Q O 0 O p V w Z 2 O o z ip YEa :F' sYP ~~ VoY 0 €_° ~ << f gN o e :a2 i e ~€i ~ '~3 a F'; 0 t ~° - ~_- r ` " u Eq E o_ E ° e ~ = v~um=n~a V;q ~e« 2~@ _~ u _ ~y ';L ~_ ~ -Cm a"" ° ~ im m of r c o m -_ EA .& = vim-iY ~`u n ~ aE z O C=PE °O " - - a a C°- ao ` - ° c6$== ~~~~ «g °-'3 s u v w o emu :' -` - ~ _ ~ n~a 3 __ cEEa- a ~ o m ~ ~ a u a y a $ E- ff. J° E r u F~ g f ~nEe J O ® ^ 9 s „ E - ;. ~s ~E~ E u N ~ n C _ -~rv Eu E - 9t O~ rrv xn ~rv~n ...rv .nx mmmv-in axa n... a~ £a~ VE a ; u-ona~ o Q ~~~ ~~.~ ~r v W 1 O 's 4 d^ LL ~ ~ >:. " 2 ~ O ~ v a W O ~ = J LL Y O Z .9-.S O W W m 1`YY F Z O .u O w LL ~ K ' ~ ~. ~ .sr~-:. ; a v a ££ a < >, f J O f ~ [ ~~' ~ n O vi O in ~. x - F'M J V1 O O ^ ~ O } ~,. f' ~ ~ • ~ • ~ {' ~ ~ ~ ~ • • • • .9-.f .B".l " 4 .9'.S .0-.E . l-.b 1 ~~~ ~- .R.EZ ,~~_- r ~ ~ ~~ o a 9 , rn .~, N J Y C L ~-+ .3 c O .~ 0 ++ w O C Q Y 2 2 ~ O ~ w N _ 2 i O N O o w 0 0 u w 3 ~ ~ o o z ?sa oE2 x?a ~~ ~a a LF~ E 4~ ~ p p~3 E d~a B 1 1 1 1 0 .~, u L ~--~ N CD > i ~ F O ~ w ~ r Z 2 2 O ~ p '^ O 0 rc 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z 3= ga3 ;F; %y ~° +r ~ mg :oa £~~ d•2 4~ 8 ~~6 goy ay y °a ~ e v p 3 g 0 .~, U N i N a--~ N (6 C O U N U Y~ ~~ ~ V W , F ~ Z Z i O U ~ N ~ O O p u w z i ~ o o z s~ tag :e; eEF z~~ §m~ g; SPS L~ ~gi ~~n so ~ae .S 3?a O f p 9 $v-Ea _ - =Et s; E € -ES a T av p 5 ° ~ E ffi E 2 a ` v - -oEv _ e~E~`T u y so _ £ c ° of $..« .= u u ~ - - _ _°Y9t'v'i~v -- O ~E OC ~ a a _ - '>~ _ ~$ i ~ q A -~E nr &Er Em ~. n~~e 99 s~~~ O® ~ ~ ^~ ®~ w V LL W Z O w l7 f O O LL W K Q J d J f N ON _~ 0 0 V N (O C L (6 d 0 ~E 2 p i o u c a o ~ o O o uw z ~ ~ `o o z Y ?Ed :2; LY. 6EP ~~ _ 86`0 dY o ewe m `F: ~ ~~ ~ i 2 gpggg ~ ~ Saa ~g{ v yYY ~ a ~`. A Eo E~ E< _ my - b¢ sv ? C rv i m .v-.v i e .~ 0 Y .~ C ~_ N rU Y {~ W i ~ 2 ~ o E i ~ i i i o u s 0 0 0 o $ ~ w z i ~ o o z i 4EE i Es eEe Y~ 6~ F~6 [a E e Y~ E€ ~6a P. g£ €~~ a $'a a 3 E 0 :>~< < Eo - Ea ~y - E a~ §_ oe ~~ ~ ':a'n,a 1 r'~r-r Q~...,~ t .~ a~ 0 .~, N u c c w r~ ~o O ~ 2 p 2 2 i O U z o O c ~ O p U' w 2 2 v4 O ~ 2 ?°d eFp 3~N 8e~ o E2~ ~£~ ~ 3 '$i ~t~ E Erg '4y €4Y $ ~$a B i I E~ ~_- E Eu 5? 6 6 is p~ y~ 3 ht~~ e .~ Y N .~ V C C W N 0 0 i o O U 2 6 2 2 Z O ~ rc o O rc ~ O p U w 2 2 a4 0 O 2 f ?aa :Fe :F of 5=' 3 ~: _ ~6£ O m~ ~ S=€ £ $N 8 yE :2F 3 ~~'o :va E €g ~ m? Y :~s .z,e o = £v _- i5 E~ C i3 ~J _? ~m F E 3 E z° .Ol-.b 0 e .~ ^~ W ^~ W U C f6 i ~-+ C W LL >t i o o ~ i a r ~ z i i o V ~ O O O p U w 3 O ~ 2 Y~ ~. gd °Ez zp ^•~ ~`9 °a cF° ate' g% ~ =g£ ?~i m4Y a ~~ v 2 3 E 8 O C O .~ W T a-• +-~ C N ~_ U C (O i ~-+ C W M LL C (6 ~~ z o o E W p i i z ~ u c 0 0 a ~ 0 0 u w z i ~ o a z $xo aEY .F~ mS 0 Viz` :~~ p ~F~ 3 f~e ?Y g ;sa p v 3a 8 . :,a 1 ~ 1 i i 0 .~, w T ,~ .~ c ~_ m U C N i ~-+ C W N ~_ z o o ~ i a r ~ z z i o u ~ 0 0 0 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z B ?ga a:i p? ~~ $ ~4 m 2 Q Fi Y :p: ~ z~~ p ~~_ ~ ~@s a gss E ia4 $ `a ?~ B c 0 .~ w +~ .~ c ~_ N U C i Y C w N LL C M ~~ z o o E i i Z V ~ p H ~ O O p U w 2 2 O o z z a'a €Ep t~% ~~ s~v o P { ~` iei p `€ 3 X55 F~% f a ~' o 0 .~ a~ w Y .~ V f0 L w i Z z O O F w ti G Z z 2 O U p Q O a ~ O o U w Z 2 O O 2 Sc Y~~ .43 eEC ~~: _ ~6£ 0 :o° ~ ~E§ £ ff~c ~ 3 ~y> S°3 ?2~ E €rB 8 a?a o 1 f 1 1 i \ l \ \ 1 1\ \ .0-Z ti \ i' ~~~ Q J \~ 1 Q \ \ / \~ 5 U LL N U C L +~ w .~ m r 0 i i 2 0 O ~ i ~ ? i i o u rc a o a o o a ~ w z i ~ o o z gEo EtE 0 F ° '~ SSS E N' p Eef ; ~~8 ~O~ Pg€ E €SR aye B U (6 LL U C (6 i a-+ C W C .~ 00 N 0 >~ z F O ~ i a i z i o u a O O O O w t7 w 2 2 O O z 4sg :fe 6Y Y L~~ E :33 ~ :~_ ; FY~ E €a5 8 a3o A _E E - -_ __ ;oa _ 3 _ E QE° °EO 90 opp En 9G ~ a cp E' : c _ _ _ _ _ sm b~ gm fm _ S s" _ 9 °vE `- oa _ Sv p~m %_ _i ~E iE 9v o_E _u _ J c _ v3 -?'g or V.. V On iU ., tl. of Z. Ed ~o _ w a q - O u n d d rt n u d u c. ¢ ¢ ¢ ~ y __nE~pm o®®o®®o®®0 0 0 a®®000 i < , ~ Q. m v p ... a a b o b o ~ ~. `<; Q , ~ ;;~, '~ ~~~i~~r ~' ~° ~ ~ ~~~~ ~,~ v~ ~ ~- 11I ; Vii, ~A ,,. a I `~-.:::,--~ l l ;~ r ~~a -1 Lf ~~ ~~' i' -I ~ ~~ ~ D o 4 4 4 '- _ i "~ ~ I / ~ s ._ - _ a~ ~ 1 , ~ - _~~ f-._--1 ~~ _~ ~ . d/L-.E ~_ ___ I ii L-'.. 3` > ~ __ i '- ~ -, _ ' ., .___ - >, .~ -a Q J w > i i o 0 wp ~~ _~ 0 ow oa u w ~z 3 ~o o= °4~ _ ioa a ffmP3 E °b~ _ _ 3 2y` € E :~ ao $ a;a B v n 3~ - ofi BE E ; _ d n D`-R cEE°Er E e;V ~i `ups°E E' _ . 9 v ~ a 2 _ _ `o_ ~ ~ 9 o E o _ Q E _ _ - 3m 9m ° _o _o u_ 2N r .Ti ~ W On p vD _ - a~_~ g -~- _V rvQ i2~iD Yi c jv v ~g o az~ = m _ _ m ~ `u w ii E s E ~E _ rv~m~LrvNrvtn A~~-a- E o®a a a®a ® ~ dl S. f pp ~ k ~. . a ~~ :,F; '.. ;o 'A''2ue i~~~'9 \ ~ E ~ a ~lC j ~~ .li~ en, ~`' ® ` E -= = o - !' ~ f y ~f ., .~i..~ Y~.r ~S- S Li YYY~. ~Yx v i , > `'"§'~`~i7' ` .•., I .9-.b 0 ~ ~ S' O . /l ~ fi. a .9-.b ~~ _: ~ ~~ ~ n f S a ~ . v s 3 y Y* O k 4- ^• <~ a 5 - I b >_ - ^ .Pd ~ - .5 .8 -_ 0 U N > i i 0 =s i- G z z z ~ O O p Q O ~W z i ~o o= ~~ FEa EF aE2 a? c.~ §6; `o ~~ .~ 0 e "s Q~ s c yE~. 6 Seg ~ Fy9~ v £P'S 8 a~a B ~ E~ d n 3 'c_ `c_ ~ ~ a _~ u - E 2~.R.~ u_~N z 'S -_ ~ u 9~ EA m a A$°' ~~98 mt Ea e_ ° 3y_ w a» u: a a v i - q q ? f _cn-crv_m~arvrv <mAV°'aE~~AaE O ® ^ ^ a®o =~ r~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ m ~ "~ ppit 1 ~ I~[ f ~~ 4 Vli '~ Y4"- / F I I ~`- { y I ~ ^~ n Zu .' . .9-.6 O 1~i~lJ ~_ t /J O .9.> f ~N i.']3 ~ P o w_ ?~ ry /~ > .P.t - lll ~ .Z/l S-.b " w 6 fl .5 ,8 0 U )~'l'~ VI ..Y s .3 0 u N > i i O o G w p Z O n O o a 0 0 ~ w z i ~ o a z i' mE% 8 6g a~ ~ ~~~ Y Ssfr f p ~e@ j .`[ „ ~~a a F~~ $ P33 3?a d3 ~ - v E .; v ; E q q 3 E R _ t _- _§L e_ Em _m ~s°m mo z z z a. J c3m?c00- ..4a ~ u °E °'E 9~ 0 0 0 ,~ ~. o ~' t o 'Ill f .E. t--t f ~ ^,~ O 04 " a m .8-.t ^"' .OCAt davq~° LLao-~ __ 0 U +~+ L lL ~_ _~ 0 wp ~~ _~ 0 o w 0 0 u w z i a o v z Pia "4i e65 Fay £z ~ i aNO e ie s Ea° S°"; E E~g 8 :,e A -zm = - _ ~ E _ - e a,~en _ aE E ass `o E_ mE a9 V o s _ mY i ~ ~'E _- m E- Q Q Q cV UYa6OagQ ~~m;E ~ ~n On VN £O EL £ d `u -a_~---~=r~q~r_~ o®o0 0 a a®a O O O ~ y= ` O .~ ~ D .e ~ - ~ 3 O~ m~ .8-.t 9 a~ w9 0 U N ~^, W N 0 J ;_ =a o~ ~~ __ _~ 0 ow 00 ~w __ ~s o~ PE2 .F; 2.g ~s~ o ~` `~a ~2~ ~~ ~ ~y~ ~~fi P~~ 94 Ey a$a v F 3 E 8 e E~eoE E 3 Eu~ ~i$p;i EE au 90 ~i mE ~N E'?a - cO O; oa E ~3g 9G E.". E„ vR ~g _u 5 C Oa Q ~ ~ E o - ~ ~ - Si n. w 0 .an V .n O r _ _ _ _ _ m9 o~ a z,~ ~ .z,~z a ~ ~ ~ ~ o~ a ® j ~ -mot- 4 -- .~ _- O .S'.8 rn in ^~ ^W, i ~~ Z ,_ ~ F ~ V w = F ~ 2 2 2 O u o ~ 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z ~aa PEZ ,aE o Eg~ E y84 a e ~> E ~y $o - 5 E s _ Ea ~ : Q - m Em - - - z r t A o aE aE v= o- - a a ~ w ~~ o: ~ - - - - - -~ o®®o a o o ® o ~a a m .o-.Z o ~~ 0 - a ~ "" ~ • v_ w~ m~ >N mi m; >H .S d/l Z . 0-.9 .~, a~ +.. ~_ =o of _~ :~ __ _~ ~~ ~a a 0 oa ~w __ ~a o= ?~d -g: ~Fp CEo 5s m a° 'e` 4£ ~ e _E£ ; ? _ ~' gos° E sF :Y ~?$ 8 a;o A _ E _ ENV ~ i _ - _ E - ~ 9: E~ Eo 9G ? `q Em - m o E `gym Em Qm p- mzrn _ _ _ _ _ - - - G P - - -- '- °_ vm °E mm mE P iE 9E of uy J_ u_ J ~ @ i _ -_ o'., u: o"S V~- O.`. mY, o`: u°»>: of = 2' 2' 2` - _ w d a d a d a d a a d _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 - 0 3 -EA ~ ^ :'3 ^ ^ 7 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ E E E i i i _v_q;~ o®®o®®®©©0 0 0 o®a®ooao ®~ ,--~ `, ® _ -__ wx ~ .o S~ ® - -- - _' ~ 1 C 9 o ®~ _ a ~~ - ®~ o" ~ o~ -_~ i _ _ .c,a -` a~ Q U .~ V ~_ _~ o E _~ -o _~ a ~ w O p U w _~ ~e o~ 4~0 Ep ~. _:~ `a o _' e i;? E a9~ p [~s ; 3P`€ e ~Y4 ~ aye ~°.- ~d `o a' ~ 8 aP o_° _ is n; n" -'2 FEo ~~~ 3g ay¢ _o __ 8t°„Eqm „Y$ E°_a3mn EC i''t» ;3~E' °-5D YA QA £mEi Q`~o m~~E®3ami@o -a orv~ iSncpTi gm3o3tl° 9m`u_E'E ~~i oXv „E m- v.`?v - m_o m3~ ..q ~§uilq __ cap9-q ~cmE~9m no vt9 n~d° -°iy`uEn - c'q= WE:_E~ ~; 2Q _mSn ~n 'fim n£m'c _ _ _ _ ma m4i E~ - ~am3vo~Weu--o~muNf Em'arv rvoa .. ..rv mma 'E `urv ma `o 33$ uarvmEa~o nmo ~ ~~''~ ~ S o i:` ~ ~ a O O ~' T E E LL LL N W C ~ C N C p m j bw ~1 you M~YL.. ~ ll., ~ i N C E C ~ A O a a O O ~. ~, E E lLL N LL v ~ C P C ' [ C ~ m ~ S m m ~1~~~ M~ W O N >~ ~~ ~ V Z ~ i ~ z Z m ~ a p` '^ O w ~ o v a v `v _ w n Z ~ ~ O a z ry p ys ?E6 rn ~z o §~F - ~ oY m _ ~ o ~P§ E „s ~ C o 4 ~ 3` ~$; m g's E ~- ao Z a ga 3 3 0 _ _ ^°~ ~ 0 .~, L 0 0 V C +L+ C W N ~_ z o o G z ~ ~ C z z i O ~ rc o ~ o 0 0 V w Z 2 O 0 2 Y` s F°8 .Px e F 2 .N §sg 0 an€ E 4~ ~ p ~frS 3 :a° ~~° E PeF a ~° B ~~ - o ~r ~~°° »~ it E x E-.E°~m3r _ - -- n~ '-os u~n -- `a~~. E`~°.Pgao y°3o~ Ed~ooUCL __v_a~~„___~„°-Ser Am „a €, &m so -- ~E q3 s~ ~^ fo m of a i a w ~ Z o® E ~~~o£En 090,0: fo~~~LLE s. o00 °C" S_ n E~„~ ~9 mE 6V u^^ ~~~ O ~O= o E^' za O3cE~E0 e'OEo ~O`~~a «~a a~ v~w`id m9^°>° LL ~QO^ ^ ^ ^ z 04 ~m ~ i j l - - I: 0 c w W ,f6 V N (6 W N C W C (6 Q Q 2 i O O U w ~ N - ~ 2 O u '^ o 0 0 0 0 u w z i ~ o o z Y= Pa3 aF; _~~ >EE E ~~ e8y Q E;' f cfi S p Ygf 3 5p~ PgE 8 'YY i ie $ :,; N rm t5q - _ NA - ~4. `` dro° E ~A E2oE~V~u3r _ 3aT as ~qa E~ aQ ac ~°3-s Ei Q~Qoc~Y uEE'n$3m_.E-P~'nF ~Em~N9T FE „~ 3~ ?A fo ai ¢a i w ~ E O `a E oqA - oa=sgE' o-m oa o: fo3~ LLi ~^ OHO _ ~ _ Ee""°' n~ mV 9mo _' ~:0~ °~~ ^ ^ o O= omv""~~=_=_"i v~ 3 =EEEO C"^Fo oo Y- _ as .`. V owEi~ T~> u~0~^ ^ ^ ^ t G^ ~-.+ C W +-+ N (0 w rn VI L (~ V ~.~.~ w N Q Q r i i o a G w~ i i z ~ N 0 0 O O p t] w z z ~ o o z 4` gEa :£; oPp =~~ _ eo~ e a z pPF £ gN€ p zt i gzs ggs E '?E ~ ~? g <2e B nm YVv _ .y _ g p, a9 Q~$Ta of .E ECtgMUY ~c$~m_raEq~m a&c ayy~ SEE n2mmE=cmAmdm o~p .~.V y3~m - ~ rE~ LL2m ~d~ ~-e°O EN m~a _~m_aA-i~___°,g°°89NA E~ fE A~ 3~ T« Ya tr DE ¢d i a w m Y F o a y E ~_ w-- iqb vq Ocm__rp^,y n« O P°o,`~,~ Sr n £O gVVUF ¢~ ~00 mC~ S_ EG'„ a9 mo °oi LL~ii ^ yam OmV U=~~cZm mE EEO L~E$ a°a~a- V.inw`Fi T~~O Q~~~~`m^ ^m^ z l ~~ b w +-+ N '~ V N >~ ~--~ w C N M Q Q >t ~ F O 2 p w N Z Z i O u H ~ D ~ O p u W z i ~ o o z Y` ~yEd '~% ~~° m . e .- :~$ o p=, E ~~ ~ p F~a ; .. ~~~ E €i ~ axc i~~ g aae O _ 3 sp - - ~u aaVOa aE -q 9 xm ~$ ens*a = °Eaa`-ohs E- -_ -_ r6 qE mY ° ~ -_ ~~ up~U UT;a Em pEp mtifr _~$~os~-__s~F~ErAmee ~. ZE "3 _- ~s E^o za -,m of ¢"a" i a w ~ f O ^~ Y E ^b c`-SE n ~_m £„» O.Pa o:y f~aVVUf C~ Q0~ °C~ S_ EE„ _- -_ p Cc mo °3a u0~ pO~~ O ^Oc OmV_xEZ =z vo ~mEEEOq~Eo s0_m k~UVr _ wf i~m~~~a u~~0~ ~ ^ ^ 0 "'~ v a w s 0 /~ V >~ w C (6 Q• t 2 2 F O U w ~ 2 2 i O o ~ 0 O p U w 2 O o z ~- FEa .F£ 4~ 9g~ eo9 _ ~ e~ € ~ g3 f p ~fi4 3 F¢o I`°°° FP~ E "F4 ~ as $ aia ~ 1 `Q' AE E~ _~_ m - - _ p~m 3~B d3~$ E$~E ~' ~o- ~E •E£ULC qEi 9mgs E^t~„EYm _ 9EEV Er° _ _~`°3~po2z °qE BE oo£LLLY~v q~acGE~". o9 a`gmz ~.' C iE - T `no&Ea~vt£ LE ga~ ry$ EEoptm SSE -m<EC9 ~~°` _v~t m°i T «r~E ___ ~;.`.x Za m ns4 mgPm -~u~'o.~ji arELL~oEOEt9ES`u 4 3; S~ f 3 r~ v ~ ~~ o~ o0 0~ o. a _ ~ `F £ EP ~V Fa frv En c}~ o u £ - c Em E~ Em E-° a^$ m- F m ¢ m~ m m E m m m E m m E o ° a __ a Am BE mE o.-m mqE BCE 9pm oy,m 2,'y `o' o. ~: ~~~' O¢» mm. U~LL .n ids. >¢.. ¢n im E E C~ w a'vuo =0 3 m 0 ~ m v i ~~mEEO `O mnC SBt., A e oVU aV~~ ODO _ ~'`widm.^~ DOOOOO ,:°^^ _ fo°a_B~`£B LL^~~^ ^ DO ^ ^ ~^ OOOOO 0 U Q (6 U .J Q 2 i O aG ~~ ~~ i o u a 0 0 0 0 z V w 2 Z c4 O O 2 4~ 4aa :Fr oEP =g.i ~5 9~ a e~a ~ `2§ ~ ~~ E Z ,Y~ 3 `~ a Y ~? $ e44 ~5'e m~ a¢d B uE c ~Ob„ g u P ~o~E Ei `o EcUPpm34 6cE<~.YNBc' g; E£~i a~9°S 3u'6 uc'YV ~m _ _agc¢ Ep~Q3~.E " 3m _uEC~ - $S LLS °u auLu r~E?gE6 e~E?uue;33LLa n E E Y~ p ~~~~ Y 33 a > nQ OE ^`a £> d 40 OO mV ~°'~cZU EC wmG L ~g oo dEEO@oq u~.g qo - So_~m r~VU -6 U~6 loin` wEa°m3~Y u'~~~0~ .°~~~ ~ LL:oti^ ^ o0 0 aU E E s`9 o qer 'o.mgE~o o mo `o~~o ~^ OOODO ~~~ `L C i rL' S np. o n `o'r `o ~ ~ m F F £ Em E= Er Em Ea y3 :a io 9.% _O .h F Fm s 3n ao f m n m F ~ - v o ~ m g.. QE vE m_m A+E wE aoa E v ~0 5£ U ~ ~ FY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 > d/l .8 .o .o d/l t 0 a~ /1~ V W ~m VI ^~ W ~~ Q U rn c (6 Q z O o E w p i i z ~ u o ~ 0 0 u w z i o v z ~: ?^d O I I Ci ]Pe ~~r _ `s 5~ pop 0 Pzi E ~£ F ~ =. S[ 3 f~& °d EIS E wBgB eyy g Zia ~a z` - a34 m tmr~v of dE _ ~z_ AE - E°$g mu n~e~ -dY E~Ym~oE ~.°~ 'Ev 9~m~'33.i ~LL; mt c'u-~9' ale van yVy5G4ac ~9Ea iii ~,^nG o~A "E C' TELL _ _ ~mc.-4uuum3~~m-4 m9 EC.uo-°33rv 4.m E- wQ SAO- ne '~3 v jdo~ oo = -- Omit--`4}r EZm EY ^, S a`9 p mE EO e°°oE ..c o os °sv- _6~q - as Qo 3g-a o8~ -°~a= --ss wed ~~> °aooooo `su LLioo~m^ oo ^ ~ aV E O CSi-°E ~-v3A~o omoo=no fo$s~s ~^ 00000 a N Y ~U Q co U C //11~ LL. Q ~_ z o O F i ~ i i z ~ u rc 0 0 rc ~ 0 0 ~ w z i 3 - ~ o o z T~ 4a6 F- EEE =4~ _ 9m €~~ ~ '.%: ~ -°F 5 2Y5 Fg~ & &3~ ~`> v v v ~° m- = o~ om i f Em Ei ~e E& f^ 23 a F = -c Em E& E_rn nN x 9a 9o mOO = 3^^ _` is ~m~m o m$mmfmm o i" rm 4 mEm _m r„ .a ~Ea ~" G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E oo®®©©o0 0 .~~ ~ 4 a o~ PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN TO AMEND SIGN CRITERIA AND TO ALLOW DAY SPAS AS A PERMITTED USE IN PLANNING AREAS 2 AND 3 (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08- 0081) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) and Environmental Impact Report No. 340. B. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. C. On March 28, 2008, Kenneth Lee, representing Forest City Development, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0081, a Specific Plan Amendment, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on June 4, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and. interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08-0081 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment does not change the land use of the Specific Plan, which maintains consistency with the General Plan. The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the Development Code and staff has made the appropriate findings to support the Sign Program. In addition, allowing day spas as a permitted is consistent with the Development Code allowing "Personal Service Shops" as a permitted use in all commercial zones. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Sign Criteria and allow day spas as a permitted use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city as supported in the conclusion of the Initial Study prepared for this project. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property is currently developed as a major shopping center and surrounded by other urban uses. The proposed amendment does not change the land use designations of the Specific Plan. The proposed Sign Program will allow taller and varied signage from previously identified in the Specific Plan and allow day spas as a permitted, rather than conditional use. The subject property is physically suitable for this type of development. D. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with exstng and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will accommodate modified signage to improve the aesthetics and compatibility with the existing and surrounding development. Allowing day spas as a permitted, rather than conditional use will not have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood as documented in the Initial Study for this project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment, PA08-0081: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on May 9, 2008, and expired on May 30, 2008. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. ' C. No written comments were received prior to the public hearing. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08-0081, Specific Plan Amendment, set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5.. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4~' day of June 2008. Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4t" day of June 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA REGIONAL CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN (SP NO. 263) TO AMEND THE SIGN CRITERIA AND TO ALLOW DAY SPAS AS A PERMITTED US IN PLANNING AREAS 2 AND 3 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0081) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Findings. That the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 and Environmental Impact Report No. 340. B. On July 27, 1999 the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 to allow a 21-foot high entertainment marquee. C. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion. D. On March 28, 2008, Kenneth Lee, representing Forest City Development, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0081, Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 to amend the sign criteria for the Mall Expansion and to amend the permitted use table to allow "massage establishments, Turkish baths, and other personal service establishments" without a permitted use in Planning Areas 1 and 2, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. E. The application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. On June 4, 2008 the Planning Commission considered the application at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and other interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify in either support or opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; G. The City Council considered the Application on June 24, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter. H. At the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved the Application and Negative Declaration after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan. I. The City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16.020.E of the Temecula Municipal Code; 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment does not change the land use of the Specific Plan, which maintains consistency with the General Plan. The proposed Sign Program is consistent with the Development Code and staff has made the appropriate findings to support the Sign Program. In addition, allowing 'day spas' as a permitted use is consistent with the Development Code allowing 'personal service shops' as a permitted us in all commercial zones. 2. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment to modify the Sign Criteria and allow "day spas" as a permitted use will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City as supported in the conclusion of the Initial Study for this project. 3. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject property is curently developed as a major shopping center and surrounded by other urban uses. The proposed amendment does not change the land use designations of the Specific Plan. The proposed Sign Program will allow taller and varied signage from previously identified in the Specific`Plan and allow 'day spas' as a permitted, rather than conditional use. The subject property is physically suitable. for this type of development. 4. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of a desirable character which will be compatible with the existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will accommodate modified signage to improve the aesthetics and compatibility with the existing and surrounding development Allowing 'day spas' as a permitted, rather than conditional use will not have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood as documented in the Initial Study for the project. Section 2. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA°) City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Specific Plan Amendment, as described in the Initial Study. Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. The City Council has reviewed the Negative Declaration, and based on the whole record before it finds that (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment. Based on the findings set forth in this Ordinance, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared for this project Section 3. Specific Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA08-0081, Amendment No. 2 to the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan No. 263 as shown on Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk ~~ -. BAHLE I7A - '.13e>~o1IlE oB PsnmarrEn irsEs • .. Planning Areas Ii 2 and 8 ~DESCItLP12pNOB~USE ~ ~ Planning Area '__~_~ ~ ~~.~ _ ~ _ ____ .... .. .. 1 2 8 heather Goods Stores ... - ::p ... :: P::;. ' X Liquid Petro2enm. Service Stations, aof including the concur- - rent sale of beer-and wine, provided the total capacity off all P <:p . ; ~•:.'X.. ' ' tanks shag not-eacced' 10,000 gallons - "' ~ ,.:> . ` .. Liquid Petroleum Servico Stations;'ineluding the concurrent . ..:., ~. ~ sale ofbeer and.wine for off-premise consumption, provided : . 1~ '`r ;: = X"' " the total capacity.af all tanks shaII' not exceed10,000 gal_ C C, . . Ions 4' .. ~ .. .... Liquor Stores ~ - P = E: ,.'.': X' ' . Locksmith8hops p p g Mail Order Businesses . _ p ..p p " Manufacturers ants Manufacturing of products similar to, but not.limited, tb, the ' ' " -following: - Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, _ . and fabrication of goods within enclosed building, aneh as ' jewetiy, furniture, art objects, "clothing, labor intensive X , . X' " ' .. ; `P. manufacturing; assembly, and.repair processes which do not involve frequent track traffic "' 'Markets; inclnding but not Limited to Food, Wholesale, ~~ ~ " • ~ . Producet }~iut, Vegotable, Fish; and Poultry and'Meat ' P ' P " ~ X : ~~ Markets, but not including Slaughtering - ' Massage Forlorn, T4~ridsh Baths and Similar Personal ~ ~ " P ~ ~ :^~r X Service Establishments Mini-Storage or Mini Warehouse C' • C .: ~'::C (3) The maximum height for parking lighting fixtures shall not exceed forty feet (40'). Orr-Site Signs: (1) Retail Commercial Entrv Monumentation (a) Major entry monumentation signage is intended to identify the project entry and shall not exceed on any one side an area of 54 square feet (name and logo only) with a support area not to exceed I55 square feet, nor shall the sign exceed 23 feet in height. Letter type styles and colors shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. Major entry monumentation signage shall be limited to the project name only and located at major entry points. (b) Planning Area 2 Oniy: Regional center monumentation signage shall be limited to one major perimeter site edge or comer provided, however, that no more than one (t) regional center monumentation sign with a maximum height of twelve feet (12'-0'7 may be erected pursuant to approval by the Planning Commission. (c) Maximum tenant sign area for Minor Entry Monumentation (with tenant listings) shall be equal For each tenant and shall not exceed twelve (12) squaze feet with a total tenant signage area not to exceed one hundred (l00) square feet, nor shall the sign exceed twenty three (23) feet in height Tenant listings shall be at the discretion of the property developer with approval by the City. Secondary tenants shall be defined as businesses with less than 20,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Colors and letter type styles shall be reviewed and approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. Freestanding monument signs shall have a minimum separation of two hundred feet (200'). (2) Retail Commercial Buildine Identification Si na e (a) The surface area of building identification signage for anchor tenants shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the surface area of the front and side walls of the building. Maximum letter height shall not exceed five feet (5') unless approved by the City during the Development Plan Review process. (b) The surface area of building identification signage for anchor tenants shall not exceed five percent (5%) of the surface area of the rear face of the building. Maximum letter height shall no[ exceed five feet (5') III-6I (b) Fully illuminated sign cans for office and institutional use signage shall not be permitted, although signage may be illuminated by halo lit individual letters, concealed ground level hood lights, or back cut letter signs in a metal can. Hotel uses may utilize fully illuminated sign cans. (c) Signage for building addresses shall be provided on every main building, preferably as close to the main entrance as possible. Numerals shall be no larger than twelve inches (12") and no smaller titan eight inches (8") in height. In no event shall cite numerals appear to be the dominant graphic device an the facade of any building. (4) Leasine, Temporary and Directional Signaae (a) Leasing, temporary, and future facilities signage shall be permitted provided the maximum area does not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet, nor shall the height of the sign exceed eight feet (8') above finished grade. (b) Multiple tenant directory signs and parki»g directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that cite maximum sign area does not exceed forty (40) square feet or six feet (6') in height. (c). Temporary signs are those signs which advertise or promote a special event, such as an opening, or offering of a new product or service and are easily removed. Temporary window signs are allowed provided they meet the following criteria: • Sign graphics of any nature painted directly on a window shall not be considered a temporary window sign. • A window sign advertising or promoting any product or service offered on a regular basis or at a regular price shall not be considered a temporary window sign. • Temporary window signs shall not be illuminated, shall be limited to twelve percent (12%) of the tenant's storefront glass area, and shall be displayed no more than fourteen (14) days. • Flashing or moving signage is prohibited. (d) Site Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed seventy eight (78) square feet with an overall height not exceeding five (5) fcet above finish grade. Secondary Site Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed thirty three (33) square feet with an overall height not exceeding five (5) feet above finish grade. I I t-63 Freestanding Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed six (6) square feet per face (with no more than four faces) with an overall height of the support not exceeding eleven (I 1) feet above finish grade. Wall Mounted Directional signage shall be permitted; provided, however, that the maximum sign area does not exceed six (G) square feet per face (with no more than two faces) with an overall height of the mounting location not exceeding eleven (1 I ) feet above finish grade. ^1-63 a E. SIGNAGE GUIDELINES This section does not apply to the mall and mall entry monument signs, refer to mall sign program. Signage is an important element contributing to the identity of Temecula Regional Center. The fallowing guidelines are intended to produce a consistent Signage design that reinforces the collective image of Temecula Regional Center as a superior retail and business location, while maintaining opportunities for individual identity of each parcel. All signs shall be designed and constricted in conformance with these guidelines. Signage design as well as location, size and number of signs shall be subject to review and approval by City of Temecula for confomtance to these guidelines. This will be done in conjunction with development plan submittals for individual projects. 1. Commercial Core Sienaee The commercial core will become a significant landmark for Temecula and Riverside County; the Signage shall, therefore, reinforce this landmark image. Many dif7erent levels of Signage are required for a commercial core, each part of a cohesive graphics program. The following types of Signage are allowed: a. Major Site Identity Sign This type of sign may be part of a freestanding architectural element. Its chief objective is to identify the center as a whole from as far away as possible. Distinctive graphics, materials, colors and lighting devices shall be used to incorporate this sign into the overall design theme of the Center. This sign shall particularly be read from Ynez, Margarita, Overland and Winchester Roads. Only anchor tenants and project name shall be identified on this Signage element. b. Primary Entrance Sign Identifies primary project driveway entrances, includes project name and logo symbol. 2. Retail Commercial Sienaae a. Primary Tenant Monolith (refer to Figure 27K) Identifies anchor tenants. Signs of this type shall be limited to major and minor entry points. Internally illuminated sign structure with pierced typography. Tenant identity trust fit within graphic area as specified on Figure 27K. Sign area per tenant is forty two (42) square feet. Anchor tenant letter type and colors may be allowed, subject to approval by the City. Total Signage area not to exceed sixty eight (68) square feet. IV-55 Building signs are limited to one sign per street frontage. Either a building mounted sign or a ground level monument sign may be used on the same street, but not both. d. Ground Floor Commercial Tenants and Restaurants Tltis wall sign type is reserved for commercial tenants and restaurants requiring special ground floor recognition. Special signing treatments on entrance awnings or canopies are allowed. 4. Theaters and Snecial Event Facilities Identification and program infonnation For theaters and special event facilities may be provided by theater monuments and/or marquee signs. These signs, if provided, shall consist of a permanent portion displaying the name of the theater, auditorium, hotel or special event facilities and, if desired, may also include changeable section accommodations program information. These signs may be either attached directly to the building or erected as freestanding signs. These sighs shall not extend above the height of the predominant roofline of the building if attached directly to the building. Freestanding signs cannot exceed a maximum of twenty three (23) in height. These signs may be illuminated internally; however, the pernanent portion must have an opaque background, with only the message portion illuminated, and set up for changeable letters. 5. Building Address Building address numbers shall be displayed on every building at or as close as possible to the main entrance. The numerals shall face the street, access the road or the approach walkway, as necessary. The address numbers may be non-illuminated and of a material and form consistent with other building identification signing sued on the same structure or with materials listed in previous sections. Number height shall be no larger than 12" and no smaller than g". The numbers may not appear [o be [he dominant graphic device of the fapade of any building. 6. Vehiculaz and Pedestrian Sims Vehicular and pedestrian signs provide information, directions and regulations for exterior parking and circulation on site. To keep their number to a minimum, vehicular and pedestrian signs shall be placed only where information is required. The use of symbols to reinforce infonnation (such as no parking, loading wne and handicapped parking) is encouraged. Wording shall be kept to a minimum. The signs may be constructed of aluminum, fiberglass, stone or concrete. Stucco is an unacceptable material. Colors for the sign shall harmonic with project architectural colors and include white. Color, style and letter height of all copy on the same sign shall be coordinated and consistent with building design. All copy will besilk-screen painted or vinyl die cut. Height IV-GG PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0003, A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE PROMENADE MALL MAIN STREET EXPANSION AND ENTRY UPDATES INCLUDING: ENTRY MONUMENTS, SITE DIRECTIONAL, MALL ENTRANCES, PARKING GARAGE DIRECTIONALS AND CAR COUNTERS, PARKING LOT DIRECTIONALS, DIRECTORIES, VALET, BANNERS, BLADE SIGNS, AND MAIN STREET TENANT SIGNS Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) and Environmental Impact Report No. 340. B. On February 21, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0293, Promenade Mall Expansion Plans. C. On January 7, 2008 Kenneth Lee, representing Forest City Commercial Development, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0003, Sign Program in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. On March 28, 2008, Forest City submitted a Minor Specific Plan Amendment to modify the signage criteria and to permit day spas in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (PA08- 0081). D. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on June 4, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the condusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08-0003 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with, and visually related to all of the signs included in the Sign Program. B. All of the signs shall be included in the Sign Program. This shall be accomplished by incorporating several common design elements such as materials, letter style, colors, illumination, sign type, or sign shape; All signage proposed for the Main Street expansion and entry monument enhancements are included in the Sign Program. The Sign Program incorporates entry monuments, site directional, mall entrances, parking garage directionals and car counters, parking lot directionals, directories, valet, banners, blade signs and Main Street tenant signs. The sign types provide for visual interests and an upscale theme. C. The proposed signs enhance the development, and are in harmony with and visually related to the buildings and/or the developments they identify by utilizing materials, color, or design motifs included in the building being identified; The proposed monument signage incorporates the same architectural elements as the new building entries including, colors, materials, and the "P" Promenade logo. The wall signage is carefully placed to promote the business while maintaining the building's architectural style. D. The proposed signs enhance the development and are in harmony with and visually related to surcounding development by not adversely affecting surrounding land uses or obscuring adjacent approved signs. The surrounding development will not be adversely affected by the proposed signage. The proposed project is in the west-central part of the City. Surrounding uses include varying densities of residential uses, commercial uses, industrial and office uses, and the 1-15 freeway. The proposed project is within the approved Temecula Regional Center specific plan area. Allowing new signs would not adversely affect the surrounding shopping centers or neighborhoods, or obscure any adjacent approved signs. E. The Sign Program accommodates future revisions which may be required due to changes in building tenants. The Development Code allows revisions to Sign Programs either by completing a Minor or Major Modification application to the original Sign Program. New signage or a change in signage will be permitted administratively by the Planning Department. F. The proposed program satisfies the intent of the sign criteria in the Development Code, except that flexibility is allowed with regards to sign area, number, location, and height. lath the approved Specific Plan Amendment, the proposed Sign Program would be consistent with the sign standards listed in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan while satisfying the applicant's request in sign variation in sizes, colors, and styles. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation to approve the Sign Program, PA08-0003: A. Pursuant to Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Sign Program, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on May 9, 2008, and expired on May 30, 2008. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. C. No written comments were received prior to the public hearing. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Negative Declaration, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 4. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08-0003, Promenade Mall Expansion/Entries Sign Program. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4~h day of June 2008. John Tefesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4"' day of June 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary INITIAL STUDY City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Pro ect Title Temecula Re Tonal Center S ec~c Plan Amendment No. 2 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Associate Planners 951 694-6400 Project Location Temecula Regional Center Specific Pian (SP No. 263) encompasses 179 acres (excluding roads) in the City of Temecula bound by Winchester Road to the north, Margarita Road to the east, Overland Road to the south and Ynez Road to the west within an unsectioned area of Township 7 South 3 West San Bernardino Meridian on the USGS Murrieta Quadran le, 7.5 Minute Series To o ra hic Ma Project Sponsor's Name and Address Kenneth Lee, Forest City Commercial Development 949 South Hope Street, Suite 200 Los An eles, CA 90015 General Plan Desi nation Communi Commercial CC Zonin S ecific Plan 7 SP-7 Description of Project A Sign Program for the Promenade Mall Main Street Expansion and entry updates inGuding: entry monuments, site directional, mall entrances, parking garage directionals and car counters, parking lot directionals, directories, valet, banners, blade signs, and Main Street tenant signs. A Specific Plan Amendment (Minor) to the Temecula Regional Center (TRC) Speck Plan regarding signage, as well as a change to the land use matrix for Massage Parlors, Turkish Baths and Similar Personal Service Establishments ("Day Spas"). Proposed changes include increasing sign heights from 12 to 23 feet for entry monuments, increasing the allowable sign area for entry monuments and site directional monuments, allowing for new monument signs (secondary site directionals, pedestrian freestanding directionals and wall mounted directionals), and off-premise signage on the new parking structures, not previously anticipated. In addition, the proposed land use matrix change would allow Day Spas as a permitted use. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The land uses in the vicinity of the project are high-intensity urban uses. There is a mixture of commercial, office, and residential land uses consisting of mukrfamily residences, retail commercial areas, office and industrial development. The proposed project site is within the Temecula Regional Center, known locally as the 'Promenade Mall', the Commons and Bel vllaggio. The Temecula Regional Center is completely disturbed, graded, and/or paved. Interstate 15, a primary north-south transportation corridor, is within one-quarter mile of the site. Utili infrastructure electri ' ,water, sewer, and natural as exists at the project site throughout the Speck Plan area. Winchester Road, Ynez Road, Margarita Road and Overland Drive provide eneral access to the ro ect vicini Other public agencies whose approval None. is re wired Background: On October 11, 1994 the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) and Environmental Impact Report No. 340 with associated Mitigation Measures. The Temecula Regional Center Spec Plan allows for the construction of 2,483,000 square feet of retaiUcommercial space, with 1,375,000 square feet to be within the retail core ("Mall"). On December 17, 1996, the City Council approved the Temecula Regional Center Development Agreement. On September 26, 2006, the City Council approved a Development Agreement Amendment and Environmental Impact Report Addendum to extend the tens of the Development Agreement an additional three years, to expire in January, 2010, for subsequent construction of the final phase of retail commercal space and parking facilities within the Temecula Regional Center core commercial area. As part of the approval of the First Amendment, the City Council found that a supplemental or subsequent EIR need not be prepared, and that the City may rely on the Addendum to approve the proposed extension to the Development Agreement and the construction of the Final Phase of the Spec Plan. Consistent with the approved Specific Plan, on February 21, 2007, the Planning Commission approved the 125,950 square foot outdoor life-style main street retail expansion and two parking structures to su rt the additional s ware foots a for the Promenade Mall. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Sign~cent Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources A ricutture Resources Noise Air Qual' Po ulation and Housin Biol icel Resources Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation Geolo and Soils Trans oRation/Traffic Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service S stems H drolo and Water Quali Mandato Findin s of Si n~cance Land Use and Plannin None Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a sign cant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that athough the proposed project could have a sign'fiicant effect on the environment, there will not be a signficent effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a sign cant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially sign cant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal eon the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a sign cant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are im osed u on the ro osed ro ed, nothin further is r uired. Signature Matt Peters Printed Name Date Citv of Temecula For 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: PolenUaly PamtiarY Significmd Uriea Less than Issues aM Supporting Infamagon SouRes Significarrt Miggagrn Signifiarp No I M 1 Im ad a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic hi hwa ? c Substantialty degrade the existing visual character or quality X of the site and its surraundin s? d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would X adverse affect da or ni httime views in the area? Comments: 1.a. No Impact: The proposed project is on developed land. No scenic vistas have been identified per the City's General Plan or will be adversely impacted from developing the proposed project. 1.b. No Impact: No major rock outcroppings or historic buildings exist on the project site. The project site is not located on a scenic highway. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact: When originalty approved in 1994, the Specific Plan was surrounded by vacant residential and commercial lands. Over the past 14 years, the surrounding area has been developed into a thriving commercial area, with residential uses to the east. The intensity of development has changed the character of the project site. The proposed sign height increases, and additional sign types for the mall will be consistent with the commercial intensity of the project site and surroundings. The signs will be designed as up-scale and enhanced structures. Also, the intent of the new signs is to replace the existing signs, which are characterized by pinwheels and jazz instruments in primary colors, with a more timeless and classical look highlighted by neutral colors, and abronze/cursive "P" Promenade Mall logo. The applicant has described the new design theme as promoting "sophistication and elegance" and is intended to compliment the revised architecture for the mall entries that was approved by the Planning Commission in December 2007. The new signs will enhance the visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings. The proposed 13 foot height increase to three existing signs (see description below) will have a less than significant impact. The proposed land use matrix change to allow Day Spas as a permitted use will not have an impact on aesthetics. All future Day Spas would be subject to design review and approval per City standards. 1.d. .Less Than Significant Impact: There are five new entry monument signs proposed to replace five that already exist. The two existing monument signs at Winchester East and West are 23 feet high and would be replaced with signs the same height. The other three signs at Ynez Road South, Ynez Road North, and Margarita Road are 10 feet tall, but would be replaced with 23 foot high entry monuments. The height increase is consistent with the intensity of surrounding development. The new monuments are proposed to have up- lighting in order to provide a visual enhancement to the newty design monument signs. However, the limited impacts associated with the uplighting of the monuments would be reduced with the implementation of the night lighting standards as established by the General Plan and Specific Plan, which mandate that each project conform to Palomar Observatory lighting requirements as established in Riverside County Ordinance 655. Specificalty, the up-lighting would not be allowed during non-business hours (after 11p.m.). With implementation of these mandatory design requirements for lighting, the project will not cause significant night lighting impacts. The proposed land use matrix change to allow Day Spas as permitted uses will not have an impact on aesthetics. All future Day Spas would be subject to design review and approval per City standards. 2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricukural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Ske Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Califomia Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agricukure and farmland. Would the project: PdenUaily PatanceAY Signifiemq Unleaa Lana Than hsuea anE SuppoNn9larann~ion Sounxa Sigrufrcanl MNgelian SigAficaril No I art In e0 I 1 a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of X Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-a ricukural use? b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? c Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X due to their location or nature, could resuk in conversion of Farmland, to non-a ricukurai use? Comments: 2.a.-c. Less Than Significant Impact: Prior to development of the regional center, the site was used for dry- land farming and pasture and was considered prime farmland and local important farmland. Therefore, the EIR considered development of the site potentially significant to agricultural resources. The site is now wmpletely disturbed with most of the site paved for parking lots or covered with structures. As such, it is no longer considered valuable agricultural property or classified as important farm land by any local or State entity. Therefore, the proposed project would not be considered a significant impact to agriculture. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: . Potentiapy PalmfialY Significad Unless Less Thai Lxvas and Suppa6~g Inrormatlon SouRes Sipnificad Mdpation Siyruficam No I Irk:a etl M Im as a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air ual' Ian? b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existin or ro acted air uali violation? c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed uantitative thresholds for ozone recursors ? d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of eo le? Comments: 3.a.-e. No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with the applicable air quality plan, or violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The City of Temecula Final EIR for the General Plan takes into consideration the entire project site as commercial use. No impact is anticipated as a result of allowing new signs or permitting. Day Spas without a CUP. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? aaenuaey Pataroa6y SignififaN Unless Lest Than bsuea antl SuOPerong INamation Soun:es ~ SlgrafiarR Mi6geUm Signifiomn No Im I 6n kn a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildl'de Service? b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community ident~ed in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interru lion, or other means? d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation Ian? Comments: 4.a-e. No Impact: The site is curcently completely disturbed and/or developed with a major shopping center and other urban uses and paved for parking. No biological resources remain on-site with the exception of some landscaping that has extremely limited value for use by native wildlife and a drainage that will be protected in place on the Bel vllaggio property. The project site is also surrounded by other urban uses and isolated from habitat areas making it generally unsuitable as a wildlife movement corridor. The project site is not located within a wildlife dispersal or migration/movement corridor and the lack of habitat resources indicate that the proposed project does not serve as a movement corridor. The project site is not subject to any policies or ordinances concerning biological resources or tree preservation. The proposed project would not disturb or destroy any biological resources. 4.f. No Impact: In general, all projects in western Riverside County are subject to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). However, the Temecula Regional Center site is completely disturbed, paved, or in the process of development and contains no resources protected under the MSHCP. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the plan or result in any impacts. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Poten6aDy PaterNaYy Si9rifioeN UNeu Less Than Isauea antl Suppwtiiq trdortna6an Souroea SigNfieaN MifiyaUOn SigMcmM No In hn Im a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b Cause a substantial adverse change in the sign~cance of X an archaeob ical resource ursuant to Section 15064.5? c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or uni ue solo is feature? d Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 5.a-d. No Impact: The site is currently completely disturbed and/or developed with a major shopping center and other urban uses and paved for parking. The project site is also surrounded by other urban uses. No cultural or historical resources are known to exist on-sfte. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to disturb or destroy any cultural resources. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Patenfially Palan6aGY Siynificarp Unless Lase Than ' bauea aM Supponin9 4Aormation Sources. Sigrifiam MNgatian SigiYficare No Im 1 ea kn Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, includin the risk of loss, in~u , or death involvin a Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geolo S ecial Publication 42. b Stron seismic round shakin ? X c Seismio-related round failure, indudin li uefaction? X d Landslides? X e Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? X f Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that X would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral s readin ,subsidence, li uefaction or colla se? g Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of X the Un'rform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to Itte or roe ? h Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 6.a-c and f. Less Than Significant Impact: The site is located in a seismically active area typical of Southern California and is likely to experience ground shaking due to earthquakes or nearby faults. The Elsinore faun and Murrieta Hot Springs fault are located within one mile of the project site. However, no active fault traces or faults have been found within the project site. The City requires all construction to meet geotechnical design standards. Implementing the standards required by the City and the published geotechnical requirements would ensure that the potential impacts associated with faun rupture would be less than significant. 6.d. and e. No Impact: The landslide risk within the area is low due to the existing topography and the general competence of the underlying geology. Additionally, the site is now completely graded and developed as with commercial buildings and parking lots. The overall slope of the finished project would not create a sign cant potential for landslides or mudslides. The proposed project will not result in substantial erosion or the loss of topsoil. 6.g. Less Than Significant. Impact: The proposed project has soils with generally low expansion potential and the project does not involve any habitable structures. Therefore, impacts of expansive soils would be less than sign cant. If expansive soils are found on site, the City would require construction methods be used to ensure that the project is safe and impacts in this area remain less than sign cant. 6.h. No Impact: The project includes signs and changing the land use matrix to allow Day Spas without a CUP. The project site is served by public sewer and will not rely on septic tanks or attemative wastewater disposal systems. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Pamtiatly PaaNally SigNfic~t UNeas Las Than bwea eM SuppwBng IrKamagon Soun;ea Si9nifiaN WiU9aGcn 1 rated SigndicaN hn No 1 a Create a sign cant hazard to the public or the environment X through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b Create a sign cant hazard to the public or the environment X through reasonabty foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutey X hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existin or ro osed school? d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous X materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a si n'fiicant hazard to the ublic or the environment? e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project resuR in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the ro ect area? f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the X project result in a safety hazard for people residing or workin in the ro'ect area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation Ian? h Expose people or structures to a sign"fiicant risk or loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermored with wildlands? Comments: 7.a. No Impact: The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed project is for a Sign Program and Spec'fiic Plan Amendment to increase sign heights, off-premise signs, and permit Day Spas without a CUP. The project will not generate hazardous materials that would create a significant hazard. Typical transportation, use and disposal of wastes associated with construction are anticipated, however these are not considered potentially sign cant. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7:b. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a sign cant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonabty foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project consists of signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP. The releases of hazardous materials into the environment are not anticipated as a result of the proposed project. No impact is anticipated as a resuR of the proposed project. 7.c. No Impact: The proposed project is located wthin one-quarter mile of James L. Day Middle School. However, the proposed project (signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP) is not anticpated to emk any emissions, materials or wastes that would create a significant impact. No impact is anticipated as a resuk of the proposed project. 7.d. No Impact: The project site is not located on a ske which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not resuk in a sign cant hazard to the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a resuk of the proposed project 7.e: f. No Impact: The project is not within two miles of a public airport or private airstrip. According to Figure 5.10-4 of the French Valley Future Noise Contours in-the Noise Element of the General Plan, the project is not- located in the noise impact area for the French Valley Airport. In addkion, the project is not located in the French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zone according to Figure 5.9-3 in the Land Use and Planning Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the project will not resuk in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. 7.g. No Impact: The proposed project (signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP) would not impact an emergency response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 7. h. No Impact: The proposed project ske is a commercially developed mall. It is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. The location of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact is anticipated as a resuk of this project. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: PaentlaYy PolermaYy Sig'ifitant UHesa Less Than Issues eM Suppo~dng 4lrortnaGan Sounxs Sipbficant IdItl9aGon Significam hb 4n I ed Im Im act a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X r uirements? b Substantialty deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net defick in aqurfer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been ranted ? c Substantialty alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or X area, including through the akeration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would resuk in substantial erosion or sikation on- or off-site? d Substantialy aker the existing drainage pattem of the site or X area, including through the akeration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-ske? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or rovide substantial additional sources of olluted runoff? f Otherwise substantial) de rade water ual' ? X g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Ma or other flood hazard delineation ma ? h Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which X would im ede or redirect flood flows? I Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury X or death involving flooding, inducting flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Inundation b seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 8.a Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is for a Sign Program and Specific Plan Amendment to increase sign heights, allow off-premise signs, and permit Day Spas without a CUP. Recent development at the Promenade Mall has been required to implement a Water Quality Management Plan. There will be some minor construction associated wkh the signs, however this construction activity will not alter violate any water quality or waste discharge requirements, substantialty degrade water quality, create substantial runoff or aker the existing drainage pattem on the site. 8.b. No Impact: The project (signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP) will not rely on, or impact groundwater supplies. 8.c. j. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located partialty within a 100-year flood hazard zone and partially wthin the inundation area for the Lake Skinner Dam. However, the signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP will not resuk in people, housing, or habitable structures being exposed to sign cant flood hazards since the project does not involve construction of any additional commercial square footage. Further, the project ske is not subject to significant flood hazards seiche or tsunami. 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: aaaremy PaamiaAy Significaa UNesa Less Than Issues arM Supporting IMOml2g011 Sources SigniACaN Mitigffion Signigamt No Im 1 e0 Im a Ph sisal divide an established commun' ? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding. or mitigating an environmental effect? c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Comments: 9.a. No Impact: The proposed project is in the west-central part of the City. Surrounding uses include varying densities of residential uses, commercial uses, industrial and office uses, and the I-15 freeway. The proposed project is within the approved Temecula Regional Center specific plan area. Allowing new signs and permitting Day Spas without a CUP would not divide an established community. The proposed project has no potential to cause a significant physical division in the existing community. 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed sign program and allowance for additional height and .off-premise signs requires a Specific Plan Amendment to SP No. 263 for the Temecula Regional Center. Staff supports the change based on improved aesthetics, visibility and lack of impacts to the surrounding community. The proposed signage, as designed, will not conflict with any policies adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. The Sign Program will ensure a comprehensive sign package/construction for the mall development. The Specific Plan Amendment for the increased signage and height will have a less than sign cant impact on land use and planning as it will provide for enhanced, uniform and upgraded signs consistent with the mail expansion project. The proposed land use matrix change to allow Day Spas as permitted uses will result in a less than significant land use impact. Ali future Day Spa establishments would be subject to establishment permits and approval per City standards. 9.c. No Impact: In general, all projects in western Riverside County are subject to the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). However, the Temecula Regional Center site is completey disturbed, paved, or in the process of development and contains no resources protected under the MSHCP. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with the plan or resuR in any impacts. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: PotemiaYy ~ °^~ ~9~art UNeas Less Than hauea and SuppoNnp man Swn:es 9rvfica~d MiU9alion Sigrtifitarn Na Im I ed Im hn art a Resu@ in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b Result in the loss of availability of alocally-important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local eneral Ian, s er~c Ian or other land use Ian? Comments: 10.a.b. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to include minerals that are considered of value to the region and/or the state. The proposed project (Sign Program and Specific Plan Amendment to increase sign heights, off-premise signs, and permit Oay Spas without a CUP) will not result in the loss of alocally-important mineral resource because the project site is not identified as an important site known to maintairi such resources as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: PoteiMary Patantiaty Significant UNess Less Than bsuea eM Supporting 4Kwmatian Sou~cea Signtficant Mi6galion Siyy~ifiUnt No Im 1 6n hn ant a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other a encies? b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X roundbome vibration or roundborne noise levels? c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X in the project vicinity above levels existing wfthout the ro ect? d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the ro'ect? e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project expose people residing or working in the ro'ect area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 11.a.-d. Less than Significant Impact: Temporary construction noise impacts would increase noise levels in the area and is considered ashort-term impact to ambient noise levels. Noise generated by equipment can reach high episodic levels, but these episodes are of relatively short duration and typically restricted to daylight hours. In order to control construction noise levels to a level consistent with the City's General Plan Noise Element and Citywide Noise Ordinance, proposed construction is required to implement noise reduction measures as part of their Conditions of Approval for building permits. Construction activity is limited to Monday through Friday 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m, Saturday 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and no work on Sundays, consistent with the Temecula Municipal Code. 11.e.f. No Impact: The project is not within two miles of a public airport or private use airport. According to Figure 5.10 of the French Valley Future Noise Contours in the Noise Element of the General Plan, the project is not located in the noise impact area for the French Valley Airport. In addftion, the project is not located in the French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zone according to Figure 5.9-3 in the Land Use and Planning Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the project area will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport and no impacts will result from this project. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: PmenfiaAy PotmSaYY Significem UNess Less Than hsuea entl SuPPOrting lnfamation Sources Significmn ltiggalion Sigitlfira~u No I ed hn Im ect a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure ?' b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of re lacement housin elsewhere? Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project does not include housing. The site is within the current developed area in the City and surrounding community and all utilities are already provided to the site. The new signs may require the re-location of electrical lines or laterals, however no sign cant extension of utilities or services will be required as part of the project. 12.b.c. No Impact: The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is commercially developed property. Therefore, the project will not necessitate the construction of replacement housing due to displacement of housing or people. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. PotaNaly Potenba9y SignfiaN UNeu Less Than Issues and Supparling Irdarmadon Sources Significerd M156gaUOn SignifioaN No 1 ed I Im a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which could cause sign cant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other ertormance ob'ectives for an of the ublic services: Fire rotection? X Police rotection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other ublic facilities? X Comments: 13.a. The City of Temecula provides certain public services to the City's residents that are an essential component of the area's transition to a modem urban/suburban community. The services provided by or contracted by the City include: fire protection, law enforcement services (police protection), recreation, and library services. Other services are provided by special districts, or private service entities. These include: schools and medical services. Many of these services are self-supporting, i.e., users of the service pay a direct fee to a commercial operator. Others are funded collectively by the community residents through taxes or payment of Development Impact Fees. Fire Protection -Less Than Significant Impact: The project site is served by the Riverside County Fire Department and Califomia Department of Forestry on a contract basis with the City. Five fire stations serve the Temecula area and are staffed by both paid and volunteer personnel. The closest station to respond to emergencies at the project site is the station located at 27415 Enterprise Circle West with back-up from the station at 28330 Mercedes Street. These stations are within a five minute response time of the project site. The proposed sign height increases and locations, and allowing Day Spas to be permitted uses, is not expected to cause sign cant adverse impacts to fire protection services and no additional mitigation is required beyond the standard City code and design requirements. Police Protection -Less Than Significant Impact: The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department for police services. The Sheriff's Department has a southwest station located at 30755-A Auld Road near the French Valley Airport. A store-front station is located within the Temecula Regional Center at the Promenade Mall. The project site also has other law enforcement services available from the California Highway Patrol. The Cal'Ifomia Highway Patrol has jurisdiction along the Interstate 15 freeway. The proposed project would be required to meet the City of Temecula General Plan policies and design standards that optimize safety. The proposed project is not forecast to cause sign cant adverse impacts to police services. Schools - No Impact: The Temecula Uh~ed School District provides public elementary, junior high and high school education for the area surcounding the project area. The proposed project would create no demand for school capacity as the proposed project involves retail uses. No housing is proposed as part of the project. No school facilities would be displaced. No adverse impact to school facilities is forecast to result from implementing the proposed project. Parks - No Impact: There are no existing parks dose to the project site. Extensive regional park and recreation facilities are boated within the area. These incude Lake Elsinore, Lake Perris and Lake Skinner, the latter being the closest. These facilities offer camping, fishing, biking, picnicking, swimming and other related outdoor recreation activities. Additional open space retxeation activities are located on the Santa Rosa Plateau at the nature park operated for hiking and educational purposes. The proposed project would not place any demand on existing local or regional park and recreation facilities as no housing is proposed. It would also not displace any existing or known proposed recreational facilities. No mitigation is required. Other services - No Impact: Impacts to health services, libraries or other public services are not anticipated as a result of implementing the proposed project. No other impacts to public services are anticipated as a result of project implementation. Conclusion: The proposed project is a Sign Program and Specific Plan Amendment to increase sign heights, off-premise signs and permit Day Spas without a CUP. Based on the analysis presented above, public service issues related specfically to the proposed project will not experience potentially significant adverse impacts from project implementation. All public service issues are forecast to experience no or less than sign cant impacts if the project is approved and implemented. 14. RECREATION. PoteMialy Pate~aAY Significarn Uriesa less Than bauee aM Supposing IMamadon Souro» Significaa Mitl"gagan Significarn No 4n I e0 an hn a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood X and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X construction or expansion of recreational facilities which mi ht have an adverse h sisal effect on the environment? Comments: 14.a.b. No Impact: The proposed project is for Sign Program and Specific Plan Amendment to increase sign heights, off-premise signs, and permit Day Spas without a CUP. The project does not include housing. Therefore, no demand for recreation would be generated. No demand for recreation facilities or parks would result from the implementation of the proposed project. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Potentiapy Pateritiagy Sigrrificam UNea Lea Than blues end Supporting Information Sourm Significenl Mitigation Sigreficad No pn 1 etl Im Im a Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to X the existing traffic load and capacty of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ration on roads, or con estion at intersections ? b Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service X standard established by the county congestion management en for desi Hated roads or hi hwa s? c Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either an X increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safe risks? d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., X sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses e.., farm a ui ment ? e Result in inad uate eme en access? X f Result in inad uate arkin ca acl X g Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting X alternative trans ortation e.., bus turnouts, bi cle racks ? Comments: 15.a: b. Less Than Significant Impact: No new commercial square footage is proposed with this project, however the proposed project is intended to advertise retail uses. The traffic associated with the final phase of Specific Plan development was anticipated by the TRC EIR and mitigation measures were included in the EIR to reduce traffic impacts to less than significant levels. The TRC EIR also identifies potentially sign cant cumulative impacts to the city circulation system due to general growth in the area that cannot be mitigated to a less than sign cant level. The General Plan EIR also identifies cumulative impacts to circulation that cannot be mitigated to a less than sign cant level. No new or greater impacts to circulation will result from project implementation that were not analyzed in the TRC EIR and recently validated in the General Plan EIR. 15.c. No Impact: The project is not within two miles of a public airport or private use airport and will not result in a change in air traffic pattems 15.d.-g. No Impact: The proposed signs and locations would not impact any vision triangles or emergency access. While the signs are intended to generate interest, there would be no adverse impact to parking capacity as a result of this project that hasn't already been considered as part of the original TRC EIR. The new signs would not be in conflict with policies supporting alternative transportation. The proposed land use matrix change to allow Day Spas as permitted uses will not impact traffic, emergency access, parking capacity or alternative transportation. All future .Day Spa establishments would be subject to design review, establishment permits and approval per City standards. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: PolengaYy Iseuy and Suppatiig NfamaGOn Soutoa PalmuapY SigMima Signibcam Unleas Mifigalion Lea Than Sigrificma No Im In sated Im Im a F~rceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X a livable R Tonal Water Qual' Control Board? b Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signfit;ant environmental effects? c Require or resuR in the construction of new storm water X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project X from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or ex anded entitlements needed? e ResuR in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the rovider's existin commitments? f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the ro'ed's solid waste dis osal needs? g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X r ulations related to solid waste? Comments: 16.a.-e. No Impact: The proposed project (Sign Program, Specific Plan Amendment, and a change to the land use matrix to allow Day Spas as a permitted rather than conditional use) would not result in any impacts to wastewater treatment requirements, result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities, or require new stomtwater drainage facilities. The proposed signs will not require water supplies or wastewater treatment, and the use change will not generate any more demand than has already been previously analyzed in the Temecula Regional Center EIR. 16. f.-g. No Impact: The proposed project may generate a limited and temporary demand for solid waste and disposal services, but will not cause a sign cant adverse impact to the solid waste disposal system. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Palamaoy -PeldnialY Significant Unless Leas Than Significmtt Mitigation Signifiwn No laauea aM S 1Gn IrdomNtiton Sounxs ad I ea Im 1 a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of X the environment, substantially reduce the habftat of a fish or wildlffe species, cause a fish or wildlffe population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or rehisto ? b Dces the project have impacts that are individually limited, X but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of robable future ro'ects ? . c Does the project have environmental effects which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direct or indirect ? Comments: 17.a.-c. No Impact: The project will not degrade the quality of the environment on site or in the vicinity of the project. The project will not have a cumulative effect on the environment since the project site is a commercial use in an urban area, surrounded by development. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the Temecula Regional Center EIR and Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report. The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. No mitigation has been incorporated. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the Hering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15083(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier ana ses used. Idenf earlier ana ses and state where the are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b mill ation measures based on the earlier ana sis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Sign cant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-s ec~c conditions for the ro'ecK. Comments: 18.a.-c. A previous CEQA analysis of the site for the proposed project indudes the EIR for the Temecula Regional Center (Specfic Plan 263) which was certified in July 1993. The recently adopted City General Plan EIR, 2005, also provided substantiating data utilized in the Initial Study. The proposed project is consistent with the Spec'fiic Plan analyzed in the TRC EIR. No Mitigation incorporated. SOURCES City of Temecula General Pian 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. Temecula Regional Center Environmental Impact Report and Addendums 4. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING to consider the matter described below: Case No: Planning Application Numbers PA08-0081, Specific Plan Amendment to the Temecula Regional Center (TRC) Specific Plan and PA08-0003, Promenade Mall Sign Program Applicant: Kenneth Lee, representing Forest City Commercial Development Location: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP No. 263) encompasses 179 acres (excluding roads) bound by Winchester Road to the north, Margarita Road to the east, Overland Road to the south and Ynez Road to the west within an unsectioned area of Township 7, South 3 West San Bernardino Meridian on the USGS Murrieta Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, City of Temecula, County of Riverside Proposal: A Specific Plan Amendment (Minor) to the Temecula Regional Center (TRC) Specific Plan regarding signage, as well as a change to the land use matrix for Massage Parlors, Turkish Baths and Similar Personal Service Establishments (Day Spas) with changes increasing sign heights from 12 to 23 feet for entry monuments, increasing the allowable sign area for entry and site directional monuments, allowing for new monument signs (secondary site, pedestrian freestanding and wall mounted directionals), off-premise signage on the new parking structures, (not previously anticipated), and a proposed land use matrix change would allow massage parlors as a permitted use; and, a Sign Program for the Promenade Mall Main Street Expansion and entry updates including: entry monuments, site directional, mall entrances, parking garage directionals and car counters, parking lot directionals, directories, valet, banners, blade signs, and Main Street tenant signs Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed projectwill not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study. As a result, a Negative Declaration will be issued in compliance with CEQA Case Planner: Matt Peters and Cheryl Kitzerow, Associate Planners Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: June 4, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, orpriorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Prajed Site r~dP,~&c Fkmvp ITEM NO.3 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: June 4, 2008 PREPARED BY: Dana Schuma, Associate Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA06-0389, a Conditional Use Permit SUMMARY: and Development Plan to construct a 26,418 square foot self- storage facility with nine storage buildings and 42 covered RV parking spaces located at 41705 Overland Drive RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332 Class 32 In-Fill Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: KEA Architecture General Plan Service Commercial and Industrial Park Designation: Zoning Designation: Service Commercial and Light Industrial Existing Conditions) Land Use: Site: Vacant North: Existing storage facility and service commercial center South: Existing light industrial businesses East: Adobe Plaza West: Existing industrial park Lot Area: Existing/Proposed 4 acres MinlMax Allowable or Required N/A Total Floor ArealRatio: 0.15 FAR Landscape Area/Coverage: 10 percent proposed 0.30 - 0.40 FAR 10 percent required Parking RequiredlProvided: 7 spaces proposed 3 spaces required BACKGROUND SUMMARY On March 3, 2004, the Planning Commission approved PA01-0605, a Conditional Use Permit for Overland Self Storage. The project approval expired on March 3, 2006. The applicant did not request an Extension of Time within 30 days of expiration; therefore, it was determined that the project entitlements had expired and the applicant would be required to resubmit an application for the project. An application for the Conditional Use Pernik was submitted on December 19, 2006. A DRC meeting was held on February 22, 2007, to discuss site, landscaping, architecture, and other departmental issues. The applicant submitted revised plans on June 11, 2007. The site plan was modified to address most of staff comments; however, staff still had concerns regarding setbacks, walls, landscape screening, and environmental clearances. Staff met with the applicant again on November 1, 2007, and the applicant submitted revised plans on January 9, 2008. Staff received MSHCP and HANS clearance from the Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) on February 14, 2008, and clearance from the County Geologist on March 17, 2008, regarding the Elsinore-Temecula fauk zone. Staff has worked wkh the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction of staff. The project proposes to provide landscaping on the interior side of the east wall. This does not satisfy design requirements for exterior wall screening. All project walls should be adequately screened where visible from the street. Staff has conditioned for the wall to be moved approximately five feet to the west to accommodate for on-site landscape screeening on the exterior of the wall (Conditon of Approval No. 28). The project also proposes to paint an exposed CMU wall to match the exterior of the buildings. This does not meet the design requirements for exterior wall finishes. All project walls should be designed with materials and finishes that complement the project architecture. Staff has conditioned for all project walls to have an exterior stucco finish to match the building exteriors (Condition of Approval No. 34). Additionally, the front walls along the north side of the property do not include a cornice or cap detail. Cap details provide for a finished look and should be included in all wall designs. Staff has conditioned for a cornice detail to be added to the two front walls (Condition of Approval No. 35). I_l:/1A~9F9 Conditional Use Permit According to Section 17.08.030 of the Development Code, self storage facilities are permitted in both the Service Commercial (SC) and Light Industrial (LI) zones; however recreational vehicle storage is a condkionally permitted use in the Service Commercial zone. The applicant provided a "Statement of Operations" (attached) for staffs review in determining the appropriateness of the proposed storage facility. The facility will operate between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., seven days a week. The facility is an expansion of an existing storage facility located directly north of the site. The proposed self-storage will be managed by the empbyees residing at the existing facility. Staff ident~ed no major concerns in reviewing the proposed conditional use. The surrounding propeRies have very similar use types as the proposed conditional use. To the south and to the west of the site are existing industrial park uses, to the east are existing service commercial uses, and to the north is the existing self storage facility. The proposed self storage and RV storage is compatible with the surrounding uses and the project provides adequate screening from the public right-of-way with the recommended Conditions of Approval. The use will not jeopardize or adversely affect the character of the area and is consistent wfth the General Plan, as well as with the zoning designations of the Development Code. Site Plan The proposed project is a request for a mini storage and recreational vehicle storage use to be located on two separate parcels. The two parcels have different General Plan and zoning designations. The proposed project conforms to the Development Code regulations for the Service Commercial (SC) and Light Industrial (LI) zoning districts, as well as Section 17.10.020.N, the supplemental development standards for self storage facilities. The proposed 15.22 percent bt coverage is below the maximum allowable lot coverage of 30 percent for the SC parcel and 40 percent for the LI parcel. The project has been conditioned to file a Parcel Merger prior to grading permit issuance (Condition of Approval No. 22). The site has been designed and conditioned to minimize any negative visual impacts from the street. The sfte layout appropriately accommodates all easements located on the site including a 100.foot wide storm drain easement located on the south side of the property, and a 50-foot stormwater easement located along the eastern property line. The buildings will range in height between 11 feet and 23 feet, far below the maximum allowable building height of 50 feet. The center canopy will be 14 feet in height and supported by exposed steel columns. All proposed structures meet the required setbacks listed in the Development Code. Architecture The proposed buildings are consistent with the Development Code, Design Guidelines, and compatible with other adjacent buildings. The proposed architecture includes an exterior stucco finish in colors of beige and tan. The storage buildings will have a rustic red metal seam roof and green roll-up doors. The buildings are placed intemal to the site and will be minimally visible from the street. The project proposes enhanced tower elements with concrete file roofs along Overland Drive. The enhanced front elevation serves to sk:reen the intemal storage buildings and create a pleasing entrance area. The buildings contain various heights, wall planes, and colors to break up the building mass and create visual interest along the street. Metal vine trellises have been placed along the front and side to help soften the building elevations as well. The entry facade is further enhanced with inset detail and reveal lines. Landscaoino The proposed tree and shrub placement will serve to screen onsfte parking, trash enclosure areas, and effectively soften building elevations along Overland Drive. Section 17.10.020.N of the Development Code states that total landscaping shall be equal to the required setback areas. No interior landscaping is required. Self storage development within commercial zones requires 10 percent landscaping. The project proposes to landscape 17,333 square feet (10 percent) of the site, which meets the minimum self storage and RV storage facility standards. The project meets the minimum set back requirements and has provided adequate landscaping for the site and based on the Development Code requirements. Additionally, the project provides for some internal landscaping to help screen the RV storage area. ARhough, the landscaping plan shows adequate plantings along the east side, most of this area is off-site landscaping. As mentioned above, staff has conditioned for the applicant to accommodate approximately five feet of on-site landscaping along the exterior of the east side. Staff cannot require off-site landscaping to satisfy screening requirements. Access/Circulation Due to the long, linear shape of the property and the existing development surrounding the perimeter, the project's site design is somewhat constrained. The project sRe will have two gated access points, one on the north off of Overland Drive and one on the west off of Commerce Center Drive. The proposed drive aisles provide for a clear path of travel around the buildings and throughout the site. The proposed project requires three parking spaces and provides seven parking spaces (one handicapped space). The Public Works Department has analyzed the potential traffic impacts of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City of Temecula General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plans and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on May 24, 2008, and mailed to the property owners wthin the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The proposed project is cronditionally permitted within the Service Commercial zoning designation and permitted within the Light Industrial zoning designation of the Development Code. The project is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks and FAR requirements for the site. The proposed development oaurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project is proposed on a 4 acre site surrounded by existing service commercial and light industrial development wdhin an established area. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as it has been previously graded and disturbed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). The project will not result in sign cant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Service commercial and Industrial development was anticipated for this project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan EIR. The site is adequatey served by all required utilities and public services. The utility and public service companies were noted of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010E The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The proposed use, an RV storage facility, is conditionally permitted in the Service Commercial zoning designation. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the use type. The use, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or sVuctures. The proposed conditional use, an RV storage facility, is compatible with existing adjacent land uses and will not adversely affect, nor be affected by, any of the surrounding properties as the adjacent uses are similar use types. The proposed RV storage will be a complimentary addition to the area as the project has been designed to reflect the architectural style within the surrounding area. The project, as conditioned, has paid careful attention to the public view shed by screening the proposed used with landscaping and architecture detail. The site for this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, Landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The sfte is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features required by the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses with in the area. The proposed self-storage use meets all parking, landscaping, and design criteria of the Development Code. In addition, the project provides an eight foot high decorative screen wall and landscaping along the east side of the site where visible from Overland Drive. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The proposed project meets the requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The project provides eticient screening with landscaping, arohitectura/ details, and walls. The proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community as the use is consistent w8h all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the use will function in a manner that protects the public health, safety and welfare. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The project has been completely reviewed in reference to all applicable codes and ordinances befog the Planning Commission. Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010E The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies and standards for Light Industrial and Service Commercial development. The proposed self storage use is permitted and the RV storage is conditionally permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and the Development Code. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City wde Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The overall design of the project, inGuding the lot coverage, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vcinity Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Statement of Operations Statement of Justification Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP } 1 S i PLAN REDUCTIONS ~Qlpl•99b (9081 069[6 'v7'VV173N31 010£6 V7'@IO'HXO 3n121O dHVltJ3n0 bOLlb 3(N3nv 35021 N aa9r NOI$NVdX3 "S'S Oli'7NV21 H~AH N3J1 T1L1 21~A10 '173f'OPId ! i. ~ 1i! 9~" €~x ~ ~ ~ ;f~iiSSR ii ~~~ 3! 39l~ f~. ~ g~ii~r5~~l7N:.5Y ~! •ia ~ ! ~ ~•.~ ~~~ !~~ a ~s [~3iuhil lg3~l j~~~~~~~~l~E E! 9 SS ~ h !~ ; 1 i uu:.~•. ~~~'I~s~i~d~4i~~~~=~:~! ~~~~i ~IS~~~~~~j~~i~~~~4 i~~~;~~~j~~ I g ;i i3 € i•~•R ~ ash ~!'! '~ 6;3 ~~~ ~~ ~4 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ n e ~9~is ~ .3i ~.ies ~s~i ~e. !, F o o FO 4 € , ~ , Qe ~~f; a L ~~ E! ~ ~ ! 9 ~.~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~-g, ~ ~~~ ~ ~ !!!i!!~!! 1~ jl~~ l:~~ ''''!~t, E~ /i t~ttEi~i ~ f3'j~'! ¢gr d~d3~ 7 9ai33i~ ~ li~~~flSi~ ~! 49 f ~Y 4~ 6. ~'SjE U S: ~ a g q ` ~ b ^ ~ 005 .y .r09E2a ,n'L9I v~ °g C_ 3.SL.Sr.S9~ _ e,^~-~_ ~~ ed ________________ . .~ 1 ~ 3 ~ ~ o ~, ~ i ~ .0q~ xu: __ '~ _awL aooU Aol mrv nMe Ooov_rnaf A sunl _ .xsKi ~" ~ e ffi~ .99'L9Z LSL_[r.LSN a ~ ~! QQQ - ~tf J t_ 71 P+- '11 1 1 -ar ~ { 1 1 r _ $ ~ _ ; ' 9 la 4 n. t.5S5 c 1 ' ~ ill - 11 _ ~. ~ 8 _ 1 .1111 11 ~ • Y_'- -~_ _~_ l i ~ ~" '' _~ I ee tl Y { ~ y •1,• !~ ~ __~_ -~ ~ ppyy ~C 8dY 97b ~ Y ~ a ~ 6ay n § C ~ E 1!, of i! i$ii as 639c~eaa y ~@L:yrpe~ 5 ~ ~ - v ~aa ~~SS~; L G $ ~~s ~~ia 1 ~ L~$~59 y O C Zt ..rc 8 P~YL[~tYe S j b 5 ~ ~~-~ iE Zi J I ~ Y6 Y- S ~ ' Y ~ ~ ~ Y 1 ' 1 _ ~' O ' '~ Y >g ' 1 ~~ ; S -as `I N U : ° ~ ~ W ~ , yy ~ d ~~, 6 -YC- ! W a~ w ~ 0 6 ` ~ &` '` ~ ~~ K Sb Y tl W &6 V ~ _ ^ b ` b,~ Yg~ ~~ tl W o ~~ i ~ a Nm r p~ _ u ° ` i ~ rc Y a y k S y:~ j C£ 1 - Y 9 i s ~ .. :u o~~ ug Y~ i{~ ~ ~~ ^ i ~~~as~~3~x~~ ~ eo ~ q 33 3~°~B b ~e by 2 -" a ~` v L i f 5 1 O~OOOOO~O®6~~ v 3 ~ i N ~ 1tc -___.~ ~ 99 Q ° ;; m 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ® ' L3 ieaic ~ sa6 ~~ v~ ~ .H ~ i9~66 S Pe ae ~ P "e~¢ e U~l..~~ C5 ~~ ~ ~ ky ~ -~r ! ~~'~ti ''~°- p O dz ii is s m r u ~_ Safe ~ ~ a - ~~ < V ~ ~ ~ :n= a ra ~y ~ , ~ Y ~~ 3~ ;ae 1 a ~ a E°J z ~ as 'aft ~e i ili i li ~ ' il iii li i` = ii ii iii ii i i ii i ~`.~, F d n '~ t~ 'yy~ ~ a iL lM `Ott`1o> ° L~ ° i x 'I 2 Ii{ 4~y~ ~ ~I;I o ~ g ~~~ iI, I:I 3 'F# # i sjj W S2z~3 Siy ~ ;Y.i~~ .~ ^ A ~ xi. i.SLS 9 9 ' # n # i ~' d ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~e'~dn QapY g 3 ~ s~% sE ap eS=sae ~ ~ ~ n ~e' i 9 ..s ~~~-@~ _ Ypypy pYp A g q&c ~ aP >l~6~§1y S§~ 9 Y 3 ~ 9rL ~} C g99$gp34c a n .. g:3 ai ia~~ ~~n~n`Y 3 ~ 3 .. 3 S.5 ~ ~~dt ~ ~ ~~ a ~ o ~~~ ~ y W ~~ ~ LL Y ~?~ ~ { ~~~ a eF 4 s ~~? ° g: ~I c .c z r !~ _ ~ ~;? ~a 3 1 ~ e -a ~ 41~^ N 3~« a ~ ~~~ m i i} jjx i ;ye 6'•I s. t s s{I I t~jj ? ~{# ix {iIs ~ Fj.S ~t~ ~~I37F ` ~ ~ ~~"#' #I! x ~ s~~ i~ i~ `si t ~2~3~~;#{ ijif [,~ E€Ii~f{ FS~; `L~43 4 ; {tF 5 + s •~9 q F~i is 'i; if 4~t~~~4~~{# ilfx_ ~'}i ~~lE'7~ Ih- ~ a 'L g #[If ~~ [ ~ e# #ii€I #!i'• '99i ; ~~~ i~.~l!cI ~~i + ° ~`4~~~ 9 ss t 't i iS ~ f~e jf5 (!~ 2{ j{jy{tt~3 . ~i~~ i #;I ~t6~~3 ' ISi # n a ~ i I~ ~fI[€ ij3 ;f ~~~ "si;k. #!~I! ifS ~~i'{~~~{ ~i E ~ °- ~is~~ ! j €x. I t ~(' ji3 j#~ :# tyllj;~,E{ tstF x Ffi Ifi~'I~3 'ji i ' I t I is # s #I~ OFc~xI ss• a # E'•I t ':~ ~e'•xC{... , h.3 3 'IRI:jII is . ~ x ti 1- r .- .p ~ I III +i, ,n t I I # i x •F t i3 Ii •3i. }x a f•# ~{# ISI . i #'j# ix~ ~ 1 a~ t{3&#1:t6 `i~t 4 5•ii # I~~ '~ ~ 1 P 1 t .1 i:: i~ 1 ~.,~ ~ ~ ammr,a> rs®a~ aasza v~ v~n~~ ~ ~ i 2 ~ ~ 0 0t0fG V7'dLbTDCO 3~RI4 QMR13~0 h01J4 Q h ii o ~ anN3nv ~,oa ~ ~ µpISTIVdX3 'B'9 OFYJIN~J ~ F R r iwS t': J~ W E O O w 3 _I r;.>s.*= 111 ~ ? ~e S w W s; (QTY ~ « ~ p wp ~Q ~~ Q ~0 o= ~; '~ $ ~` ~~ m ~t V R e4 REk ~~ ~~ ~ u' ~' ~ ;s•}; ~8~ =a~ .~ 'IM ~ ~ _£~ 4 ~§~ ~~a ~ I ~. omq-sar rrma~ ocsw •v~ va~3uai ~ 6 ,i tt mrof6 b7 "aavwco 3~RIG GNV1213~0 6OUe ~ S ~ g Q n ~a{~~~ ~ ~~ av+3nv ~ r~'au NOIGNV~c3 '6'B OhYJNV~J ~ k' ~ it~. 41319D ' ZZm yQ ~ Or O ° U '~_ 7~j W y i t ~ 1 m3 ~i ~~ IL ' F-- ' ' ;i ~. e {i .Z. ~p 3 ~ ;, ;, ,1 ~ ,,~ ,~ ~~ ;~ ;~ ;~ ~~ .~ ---- ~ -- ------ i d ~. ~ r ~~ ~' i i _~:. i ~~! !(I t €~! ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~i d~#. ii~ ~ n i ~~ _,W..,.. i ~~ i ,; i i~ ~ i; i i; i i~ i it ~i t~ u -J-- l ~o ~~~ u u u i -~ ---- wa ~ mmw-seo rsoar 5 =t . ~ff _:S 'I1 .w9• ~ a ~ Iw o~sas 'vim vva~i ~ j;(1~ E f~SS 2 ~ ~ arv+~ 6a~ ~N mmz> N016N~f~DC3 B"9 Ohre ~} S ~ a ~ Q e9' ~It~~ n h. r191MN ~ i Ou e~ ~ 3a C ! d~4i ~ E~ ~ ! 66 g, ~ ~~td ~ ~1~€~ d ~ ,~ w # ~9 d ~ ~~, ~f3 ~ i Z ~a ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~~ ~ ~ p z ~~~ - ~ _ ~ s €€ 3 ~~ SSE ~ Ei~ # 9 e(+ F e gg3Q i Q c ' ~- R ?~E j ~~ W~ W} ~~~~ ~ 3E ~ 9 g€g6~ ~ dEd 7d l[1 ~~ ~ ti! ~ x ~~ Ei ~ ! l7 ~~€ ~? a ~~ ~ ~~ ~ , J" d3 0 ~ Q ° j ~ ~ I O ;S m w J Y r ~_ - ' w } l~~e -. e.} m 9 . ~ ~ ~ ------- o ~, z~ 99 ~~ F ~ - - ~~ ~ ~d iq ~ ~g #~ a' d~€~83 - w t j .,~,,,~ a a w ~ ;9 iF w ~~ _# 9w i # 3 , a~~- i ~ -~ 9 Y Y € g~ - ;~ FP s[ € 3 l # d # d ! d ! d # d e l ! d 7 a A # # d ! d # d # d ! d ! d ~ $ # d Y d # d # d # d ! d g a ! d E F s w ~ Eg 4 a a w ~ a F l a F a f a F e F YF t~ a F } e } e a F r F a F a E } e r F a F r F r F i F a F a F a F F 9 a E ~ ' - - g o © a o ® o ® v ® ~ ® o a © ® © ® o t o o J ~ ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ psp Q L 1 f ~ ± R C 9 i 3 F ~ - 3 y 1y ~ 3 j 9 ~ i t ~ i ~ ~ ~ d F ~ 3 ~ 9 o O g 9 V ^ ] ] t 0' ~ ~ f t S ¢ ~ d w F ~ ~ E 9 E ~ $ ~ t1 9 OOO1-59v (500! O6SL6 'v7 "41f173t~C31 9 3 ~m~ v~'aiavwco 3nao m+viaano eous~~ $ = f u ~ 0 N3~V „soa ~ ~r NO14NVdX3 -8'8 OFiJNVa i F d ~ ~ ~ Q Y .vvawr~ '173fCRld ~ 9 O ~l W WIt ~ ~ 3 ~1 ~i ~~ ~_ s a _ - O ~ ? a ----- W ~ ¢ ~~ ©r~dai _ ~g~ © - E8~ s © - - ' - - ;~ ~~ ~ - - -- - ~~ g } FS $f3 E~€ ~ S ~~~ _ _ ~~E ~ k E o Y _.~ o n - o - _- ~~~ ~~ € 8 ! 1 d 5 d ~ b d S d b d ! d 5 d l d 1 i 1 d ~ ~ b d b d ~ b d b ~ ~ b d ~ ~ ~ a b d £ E@@ w 4 w ~ f a a a ~ a a p a a a a E 3 a f ~ ~ e a f ~e a f a E a F a E j e a F 9 4 9 E E E e f E e i E f e ~ a ; j a a • i ; a : . a : s = G } ` + i i j . - ` S : a i a ; p~ 0 ! Y ~ : : i : ~ i i i : i : i i i 3 t i ~ ~ ~ `: a ~ o e o o ~ a e ® 0 0 ® ® ® ® ~ m ~ D o o. QI W J W ; Y ~~ Q w J W, S: Z Z~ Q V a~ ~ ;? LL~ n _J ~~ ~,~ ` M„ ~r~ 0001-~R9(50B) 065W ~~, ~v~and 010fG V7 ~@IVKKO 3MZd 4M+FJ3~0 90L19 1 9 , ~ anr+~v ~~ rvµ~l~'xb+v rypI8M7~C3 '6"9 gi7NVZ1 1. ~1 EINtI!W. •a3wfo _. Q W W ~ F- i Z C OI J W 1 f a. x ® '-~ ii - S O _ - ~ a Q o ,W.>.~~e,..... I 3, i ~x }tE FH s(F(L d' tlgg ~3. L O. V ,~am Q ~r~ g,z LL _~ ~ S i n u 00q•~iB6 !S®9) O65L6 '07 b V1~3N31 ~ 5 ~ 4 : ~ ~ 0 a 3 ,i miacs v~'aavrtto anizia a~n+~o rmur S 9 ,. Q a0 r a,w3nv asaa 'n mmsr gl §i[~1 ~ ~ ,~iy rrxn n~'xw NOISNVdX3 '8'9 ` ~° 4 1. .. ~I~ '~'' `a a ~D~ a~' _ ~ LLI 1e ~ s!ee a ~ ~ _ ~a19 a , ,`9 ~ a ~ W W 8 } Z ~ iui w! s ~~~ m ~~ ~2p3i3 ?i ~~ w~ (Q {a mY ~ 3 s ~ s 7 z i gpp ~g~ c EFL ~{ ^ Y~€ as ~ O E:~ a ~~~~ ~ _ ~ s S • ~ I ^ i rc ~ ' E ~ # ~ j ~ a Q E 6 @ } ~ ~ F ~ $ f ~ 1y p3 p 3p .. ~ 9 ~ t i -. 1 F l i t U o 3 E p f i 4 6 ~ i x~ w 6 ~ F ~l f 1 F ~ ~ ~ 9 k ~ ! ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ ! 1 ~ t 1 ! ~ ~ Y 1 F 1 ! ~ ~ 1 i ) d ! 9 S i S D ~ ! i t i ~ y ~ 1 i w E 4 1 W ~ ~ i a E a a { ~ a { ~ x { x E x E x F t E a F a F s F a E s { F x F ~ a F a E a i x E a E E 4 a E ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ mmmrssr l5me) 3 S 3 ~'°'~'e mssce ~v'~'vvr~~ it t ~ 0 { ~ ~ !~ ~ ;~' m1046 V7'@IVKKO 3/JMO @N~L3n0 YOLIV Q ~ Q r Sle~~ ~~~ 31v3/.V 3'3oa r~ ~r NOIBN1+e1X3 '9'8 OM~Nl21 ~ ! ° F . ,~ ~ •213~N0 '1731GBIJ ~ IC 1 A - Z ~ e r Q Q LL ~ n ~ c > > e e Q -- wt w2 ~ °S[ ~$ 0 • w ~~j a~a~~j ~,j J [~ W4 3~ w~ ~ 7 ~ jiig ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ C ~ ~; y E ~ E ~ ~ ~ pC t B a l g i p t § l i ~ i y i y € i 0 0 U g E f i d 9 ~ ~ ~ F w w E p 9 ~ ~ g ~ 9 pg_ ~# ss y E t 3 d a 9 E ~ : ~ ~ F ~ ~ y} i ~ s i 1 Y! ! 1 1! 5!! 7 # f! ! 7 5# ~ 4 €dddd~ddddddddddd~d~ddd~~d jji ~@@ ii~4F~i~t~kEf4FfFFfEfEe4iEEAF g 5 e} ,F ~ ~_I'y h~~;~~ mi ~ ~~vro~co 3niaa e+v ano r~ a S S S ~ ~ Q ~! ~ ~ 1 ~~i~ii9'h'~ 3rw3nv asaa ~ ~r N0191W~C3 .e.g r, ~ ~ au 1 ]~ w 11~~!!~ !. '213i4D O W a ~ W i W w _ ~ ~ 1 i ^ ~ 7 a E ~~ Q ~~ ~~ w 4~ u~ ! ~1 w~ 9 7 ~ F d F d l d 1 d 1 d 1 d 4 d * $ F d ~ 8 t d f d # d F d 4 d 1 d F @ # d F d F d g t F d € d d F # W ~ W ~ g g F E ~ ~ . . ~ 1 t a t a : ~ f a E ! F 1 F x f t E • F r E x F i E ~ F i f 4 + E V 9 f f F f F F F E f F N l a a g a / ; ~ 1 ~ i 3 b 1 1 ~ 4 i i i 3 y i g § t i ~ f c Yy i ~ i fi ~ i i yy S i O i iy i i . 0 0 5 a 3 ~ § i i O S J u, Z`. ~I 2 Q z LL Q i 1 i i ~ ' ~. ~ i ~~~~ 0001 KBY (5081 ®6426 'v7 b~34131 3 ft F f I~~~# !~ ~ . e ~~, ~ 01m£6 v~'a, ~ anima anviaaw smuv TT 3 ~ ~ 0 \]®~/ 3 r a'j~ ~ 3wanv a~„~m~4rx N019NV~C3 'B'8 Oh17NV2i ~ ~ ~ Q o7 U SI~t F fit. ` 71~ , ~IL ~1771YAId ~ t ~ ~ a ~.z ~ ~ - - - - - Q W ~ ~~_° ~ 9g ~ F ~ 0 LL W 7 e WP 9~ i3~. - - - - a~ r- i i 1 g "~ ~ ~~ w i; a~g 4~ - - - - Q e •~ E8€ ~F , - - a a ~ ~o a ~, © ~: ~#~_ ~ - - - - a - ~~ o 4 ;~ 0 ~!j Y~ ~ _J O f. Q s€ > s J 9 W j `~ r } ~€ ~ w ~ ~ 1 ?~€ m :~ E i Z o rc 3 p ~ ' $ # ~ ~ s ~ 7 # # + ~ # # # # # i 7 a 7 a # a # a + ~ # a # a 7 a + d # a ~ # a ~ , 7 a m E ~ t Y f ~ E F ~ _ i ~ pp 3 € € a a a a a a a a a a s ~ i 3 ~ l ~ a ~ ; t l ~ w 7 ~ g 3 ~ J y i U ~ x ~ f # x f k x E x E x f ~ a E ~ e 3 e e f x f x e r i x ~ x f x E x f i e g e i e a i x f f 9 a f U O g ~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ o 3 ! t t 3 ' : ~ : s t t ! i 2 : t : 2 ~ c : : ! ~ ~1 ~ y , ~ ~ ~ ~ p l e e © a ~ e a ® v ® ® ® ~ e ® ' © © ® ® v w € ~ F e a E i min v~ •aavroco aniyo aav~aaw a®uv 6 at e r , ~x+anv asoa ~ ~ M016PN.~C3 '4'S OH7NoJ ~ ~ ° ~ 3 •4 O W W4 F ~_ ~ . a ~ ; a g}tt 43~k a a Wy ---- ~ f ~ ~ o- f e~ o- a) W J W 2 ~I~ 4 ~~ ,g 9 di - _ - - a } 0 4 ----~ 0 7 ~ z 1~a- ~ ~ U i ~~ ~ LL a ~~ e~~ o ~ o i"~a,1~ O9O1-90r !9007 OG9L6 'D7 b~fYJ3u31 ~ ° 3 f ~~~3~ ' ~ ~{-y~~~'tr 010£6 d7 '@IVKKO 3M21O dNVR13nO rO1Jr o ,: Q e ttiij$$i~ qp ~~{~~!!'rrfF~1l'1~~~i' 3nraanv asoa -n mmsr NOISNV'dX3 -9-9 OFY~ND?! l23E i Iii~A~llll+~'Fa non ~+'~ 'l~aald ~ o. 5~~ '~ @ - ~ 9 O }lQ-]. R U U LL ~Y61 [? ~_ -- - u s > 4= - --•~, (3 h~- I"~_s 'i" Y-rz~ _ i~+.~. Z~ Q 0 W - U _ O - U i{-Y U a _ L S~( ~`- ~~{~ g~I!! __ - o ~4i ~- ~~f ~, F~II - sti d, ~ ~ l i 61~ 0001.564 (6061 066L6 "V7'OY173LI31 ~ 5 y Ia'1 ~ 010E6 t7 'd?JVKKO 3M?JO ON4lL3/~O 40LI4 ~ ~ 3 ~ J e r 3nrii~.v 36oa ~ ~r N015NYdX3 •S"9 OM.7Ndz1 ~ ° ~ 3 -------- 1 1 i 0 7 II ,, i a ~ ~ I~• a ----- -- ~-• - _-~__ - YI _'~ ~e3 ~ - w e L Ir~r _ k ~ 33333 3 33 ~ _ ^ 1 1 1 y 1 p ~aeo ~;~ ~ ~ r, 6~J~3a ~ ~~! ~ 27O a ~~ 3~3 ----------~ €~ i i ¢gf 2 ~~~: ~!3$ aa$ E P ~o~o6a ! ~ ~~0 ~-~ ®~ PC RESOLUTION C:\Pmgram Files (x86)\Neevia.Com\Document Converter\temp\882711.doc PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0389, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 28,418 SQUARE FOOT SELF STORAGE FACILITY WITH NINE STORAGE BUILDINGS AND 42 COVERED RV PARKING SPACES LOCATED AT 41705 OVERLAND DRIVE (APNS 921-480-044 AND 921-480-045) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 19, 2006, KEA Architecture filed Planning Application No. PA06-0389, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed incuding, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on June 4, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. 0. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0389 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; The proposed use, an RV storage facility, is conditionally permitted in the Service Commercial zoning designation. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the use type. The use, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes. C1Program Files (><86)Weevia.ComlOocument ConverteAtempt8ffi771.doc B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed conditional use is compatible with existing adjacent land uses and will not adversely affect nor be affected by, any of the surrounding properties as the adjacent uses are similar use types. The proposed facility will be a complimentary addition to the area as the project has been designed to reflect the architectural style within the surrounding area. The project as conditioned, has paid careful attention to the public view shed by screening the proposed used with landscaping and architecture detail. C. The site for this proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without affecting the yard, packing and loading, landscaping, and other development features required by the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses with in the area. The proposed self-storage use meets all packing, landscaping, and design ccteca of the Development Code. In addition, the project provides an eight foot high decorative screen wall and landscaping along the east side of the site where visible from Overland Dcve. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The proposed project meets the requirements of the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The project provides etircient screening with landscaping, architectural details, and walls. The proposed use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare of the community as the use is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the use will function in a manner that protects the public health, safety and welfare. E. The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Director, Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The project has been completely reviewed in reference to all applicable codes and ordinances before the Planning Commission. Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City; C:tProgram Files (x86)1Neevia.ComlDowment ConveReRtempt882711.doc The project is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the applicable policies and standards for Light Industrial and Service Commercial development. The proposed self storage use is permitted and the RV storage is conditionally permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the General Plan and the Development Code. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Ciry ode Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the lot coverage, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects). 1. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations; The proposed project is conditionally permitted within the Service Commercial zoning designation and permitted within the Light Industrial zoning designation of the Development Code. The project is consistent with all development standards, including setbacks and FAR requirements for the site. 2. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site that is less than five acres and substantially surrounded by urban uses; The project is proposed on a 4 acre site surrounded by existing service commercial and light industrial development within an established area. C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.ComlUoaaneM ComerterUemp1882711.doc 3. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; The property is not known to have any value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species as it has been previously graded and disturbed. Additionally, the project site is not recommended for habitat conservation nor does it support or impact any habitat associated with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Program (MSHCP). 4. The project will not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; Service commercial and Industrial development was anticipated for this project site and the land use was analyzed as part of the General Plan. The project has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the impacts analyzed as part of the General Plan E/R. 5. The site is adequately served by all required utilities and public services; The utility and public service companies wen: notified of the proposed project and no new facilities or expansion of existing facilities will be necessary as a result of the project. Existing services are available and adequate to service the proposed development. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA06-0389, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 26,418 square foot self-storage facility and RV storage, located at 41705 Overland Drive, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. C:1Program Files (x86)Weevia.ComlDowment Converter\temp1882711.AOc Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4th day of June 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. OS- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of June 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary C:\Program Files (x86)\Neevia.ComlD000ment ConverteAtemp188271 t.doc EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA Planning Application No.: Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PA06-0389 A Conditional Use Permit and a Development Plan to construct a 26,418 square foot self-storage facility with nine storage buildings and 42 covered RV parking spaces located at 41705 Overland Drive 921-480-044 and 921-480-045 Commercial. Service Commercial Service June 4, 2008 June 4, 2010 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicanUdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount ofSixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicanUdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Plahning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements 3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafterdiligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. 7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. 9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 10. The applicant shall paint athree-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL Stucco Exterior Concrete Tile Roof Accent Stucco Tower Element Stucco Wrought Iron Trellis Metal Seam Roof Gutters and Downspouts Metal Canopy Gates and Fencing Roll-up Doors COLOR Frazee 7761 W, Nutmeg Dust US Tile, S-tile, Tuscany Frazee 8244D, Copper Springs Frazee 7753M, Harvest Tan Frazee 8244D, Copper Springs McElroy Metals, Rustic Red Frazee 7761 W, Nutmeg Dust Baja Storage, Exposed Metal Beams and Posts Enviro Finish ESS LT Green Roll Rite, Denali Green 13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. 14. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots. 15. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved the Director of Planning. 16. Regular hours of operation shall be between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., seven days each week. 17. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated December 19, 2006, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. 18. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 19. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration orchange oouse. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 20. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 21. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. 22. A Parcel Merger must be filed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 23. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, oranyartifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no .cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery isnot anarchaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notifythe property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning " 24. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 25. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 26. All downspouts shall be internalized with the exception of interior facing wall surfaces where buildings are not visible from public view. All exterior downspouts shall be painted the same color as.the exterior of the building. 27. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. c. A note on the plans stating that "Two landscape inspections are required: One inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection d. A note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.° e. One copy of the approved Grading Plan. f. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). g. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). h. The locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the tentative map. i. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be'responsible to carry out the detailed program. j. Specifications shall indicate that a minimum of iwo landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. 28. The east wall shall be moved five feet to the west to accommodate five feet of perimeter landscaping. 29. All plantings located on the interior side of the east wall shall be moved to the exterior of the east wall to provide for perimeter screening. 30. All off-site plantings shall be removed from the landscaping plan. 31. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Planning approval. 32. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. 33. Building Construction Plans shall include exterior details including but not limited to wall finishes, building materials and colors, and trash enclosures to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 34. All block walls along the perimeter of the site shall have an exterior stucco finish to match the buildings. 35. The two perimeter walls along the north entrance of the site shall have a cornice detail similar to the trim on buildings A and B. 36. The building construction plans shall include trash enclosure details. Trash enclosures shall consist of masonry walls with an exterior stucco finish to match buildings, metal or wood doors, a trellis structure over the top of the enclosure, and a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. 37. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 38. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 39. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by • the Planning Director orhis/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 40. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping the covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. 41. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 42. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off- streetparking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owners expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 43. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. 44. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. 45. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 46. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated January 8, 2007, a copy of which is attached. 47. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated January 29, 2007, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Requirements 48. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. 49. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 50. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and otheroutdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and, Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 51. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 52. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 53. Show all building setbacks. 54. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 55. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. 56. All building and facilities must complywith applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. 57. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. 58. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. 59. Commercial and Industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. 60. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one- quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p:m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. 61. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 62. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. 63. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. 64. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 65. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. 66. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 67. Apre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 68. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. 69. The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 70. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the Cit~/s franchisee may haul construction debris. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 71. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy,. use, the Califomia Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 72. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure fora 4 hour duration (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A). 73. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B). 74. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 75. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required (CFC 903.2). 76. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 77. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC 902.2.2.1). 78. The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14). 79. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC 902.2.2.4). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 80. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans directly to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate wateragency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 241-4.1). 81. Prior to building permit, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet (CFC sec 902) 82. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 83. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 84. "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations (CFC 901.4.3). 85. Approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum 12-inch numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi- familyresidential units shall have four-inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC 901.4.4). 86. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9). 87. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation (CFC Article 10). 88. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door (CFC 902.4). 89. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC 902.4). 90. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 91. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of way. 92. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 93. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 94. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging offsite or entering anystonn drain system or receiving water. 95. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil engineer and include site design BMPs (Best Management Practices), source controls, and treatment mechanisms. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 96. A copy of the grading, improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit. 97. A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is required for work.within their right-of-way. 98. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 99. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 100. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations fortheconstruction ofengineered structures and pavement sections. 101. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 102. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 103. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the Citys Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the Citys standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. 104. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Pennit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. 105. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. 106. The developer shall complywith all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 107. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 108. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashiers check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 109. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. d. Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 110. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter and drive approaches other traffic control devices as appropriate Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of proposed and existing utility distribution lines less than 34 KV. 111. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soils engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 112. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 113. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 114. The project shall demonstrate that the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. 115. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies 116. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. 117. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Dana Schema RE: Development Plan No. PA06-0389 Dear Ma. Schema: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the development plan to iwnshtrct a 24,418 square foot storage facility expansion located Overhmd drive east of Commerce Center Drive. The site plan indieattes that water and sewers services will be provide by Rancho California Water District and Eastern.Municipal Water District respectively. 1. PRIOR TO THE LSSUANCE OF BUII.DING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" Leiters from the appropriate water district. sincerely, 9~mf)2v1/a~rtr~'nez, (951) 955-8980 xors: -Any amore mawon,t ~~nmmm ox mvaea ~ ha ~ 6me or Building Plm ~. for Snot of Svucmmmtetilaah ekatana. Local Bn(oreemen/ Agency • P.O. Box ~I280, Riverside, G\ 9'1502-1290 • (909) 955-8982 • FAX (909) 781-9653 •4080 Lemon Sheet, 9th'Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 '.sand [hr and ~ Water ~Engineniug •. P.O: Box 1205, Rtvmside, 6192502:1206 ~ (909)9558980 • FAX (909) 9558903 •4080 Lemon Sheet, 2rd Flocs R1v0side, Gl 92501 JBnUaTy 8, 2007 ~ il3yx~S?Ii-s;_, ~.::N4t s,~,e:; ~ . ~r FaN dDimCnu BhpLm J. Cerao~ wm+mfcFU~.a sr.va F.e:a~ ~a~a Ba Rfhab fix A Hsvm dahe 8 Hsi s xam.. om~ rte:.o J. m.ay PhmlF L Fae6ea Aef ietevt Gmud Idxegv / GTiafFimotldOBim S P.'aoV lamox rxi.~a;K Fe., a f.wek A~at Ja~eey 0.Axutrimg BelkB Gi,ofa ae~w c,.b. a..e erne a ffaie~er fJ.P car a~ szias-w-aa.e . Fos January 29, 2007 Dana Schuma City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 ~~ ~i I r' C i~ . _ ;__ ~ ~r6j SUBJECT: WATER AVAII.ABII,ITY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (NEW) RANCHO SELF STORAGE PARCELS N0.2 AND N0.3 OF PARCEL MAP N0.16178-3 APN 921-480-044 AND APN921-480-045 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD), and fronts an existing 12-inch:diameter water:pipeline within Commerce Center Drive and an existing fl- inch diameter water pipeline within .Overland Drive. Water service, therefore, would- be -available• -npba the completion of Gnaacial arrangements between RCWD,artd the pinpeity owner. If new facilities are required for fire protection or other uses, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. Sanitary sewer service to the subject project is provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District. If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office ai (951) 29§-6900. Sincerely, _ .. _ ... Corey R Wallace; P.E: _ ; Development Engiiteeruig Manager cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor ... . RaxC$o C.uu~'oxlvtA WATER DISTRICT ~~ m~cw~rois~c )t7 4'®eoa4Alirmma A9bbroIT-• (9ep 2S8G9W FAX (95D R96.89Ba ~. ` ~ .- w.w~xdowmcem - . STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR RANCHO SELF STORAGE EXPANSION CONDTI'IONAL USE PERMIT 1) HOURS OF OPERATION: Gate bouts are ftom 7:00 am to 9:00 pm, daily j 2) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: None, this project will be managed from the existing self storage office ' across Overlord Dr. 3) AVERAGE DAII.Y PEAK HOUR TRIPS GENERATED: 15 4) EQUB'MENT OR PROCESSESS USED: NONE ~ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: None ~ OTHER DESCR~TIONS: -This is or expansion m or existing self storage facility actors Overland Drive which will have storage baildutgs to house household goods as ' well as a covered RV storage with 67 spaces. The enhance to the facility is on Commerce Drive via or access gate and the exit is an Overland Drive via or access gate. To ensm~e that Overlord Drive will not be crossed directly the managemem will show units to new costumers by a street legal motor vehicle, dtemafter the costumers will have then own access code to gout dQect access to the facility from Colnmetce Drive. GEr 1 9 2006 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION .. . STATEMENT OF NSTIFICATION FOR RANCHO SELF STORAGE EXPANSION CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT I) The site is snimble and adoquate for the proposed use of art expsosion to im existing self storage facility across the street The terrain and space is similar. 2) With a peak hourly traffic visit of 15 the traffic impact an the surroimding roadways in very minimal. 3) The public wellarc of the persons residing in the welfine will be 6rnefned by providing them with space to store tlie'v R V's and hou~hold goods that they choose to store at this facility. The [teed for increased storage apace to serve the publk is easy W see when one notices that there are do vacancies at existing facilities and long waiting lists for spaces when they do become available. By expand'oig on to an existing facility a separate management space is not needed and in nun the available land is used more efficiently. 4) The design of the facility is such Wert it uses stucco and black, painted with earth tones, Spanish style "s" tiles, arches and exterior wall relief, dark red metal roofing on the interior of the lot and en ebuodance of landscaping so that the appeazmce will not only be oompanble with the requiremems of the City of Temecula but it will also enhance the area by adding pleasing architecture visible from the street and a secured and monitored site so that safety is increased as well. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING C:\Propram Fiks (x86)\Neevia.Com\D000ment Converte~lternp1882716.doc Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below. Case No: Planning Application No. PA06-0389 Applicant: KEA Architecture Location: 41705 Overland Drive east of Commerce Center Drive Proposal: A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 26,418 square foot self- storage facility consisting of nine storage buildings and 42 covered RV parking spaces Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32 In-fill Development Projects) Case Planner: Dana Schuma, Associate Planner Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: June 4, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 6;00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 6946400. C:1Program Files (x86)Weevia.ComtDowment Converterttempt882716.doc