Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutConditions of Approval MAR-13 -2002 17 43 FROM TO 190969464'778 Y.l'2/3b r ~'~ P ` oard of Su ervisors County of Riverside 1 2 RESOLUTION q0. 88-973 ADOPTING SPECIFIC PLAN q0. 217 3 (Redhawk) ": 4 WHEREAS pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 65450 " 5 t se ., a public hearing was held before the Riversfde County Board of 6 upervisors in Riverside, California on September G, 1988, to consider Specific 7 lan No. 217 (Redhawk); and, e NHEREAS, all the procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act 9 nd the Riverside County Rules 4o Ymplement the Ac4 have been met and 10 nvironmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 226, prepared in connection with the 11 pecific plan, is sufficiently detailed so that all the potentially significant 12 ffects of the project on the environment and measures necessary to avoid or 13 ubstantially lessen such effects have been evaluated in accordance with the 14 bove-referenced Act and Rules; dnd, 15 HHEREAS, the matter was discussed fully with testimony and documentation 16 resented by the public and affected government agencies; now, therefore. 17 BE IT RESOLdED, FOUND, DETERMINED, AND ORDERED by ehe Board of Supervisors 18 f the County of Riverside. in regular session assembled on October b, 1988, 19 hat the following environmental impacts associated with Specific Plan No. 217 20 re potentially significant, but will be avoided or substantially lessened by 21 he identified mitigation measures: 22 Geology and Seismicity 23 1. Impact: The AlQuist-Prlolo Special Studies Zone runs 24 through the southwest section of the project 25 site. The Elsinore Fault System, located ~aW m26 W b s>z m °'27 1 n 28 '' . o :¢~ LL~ ti o a c dl , O MAR-13-2002 17 43 ~1 II a a 6 7 s 10 l1 az la ld 13 O 16 17 18 is ~o ~1 22 2S 24; 2B 26 27 ~e FROM 2, gitiaation• B. Sloves and Erosion 1. Impact; 2. Plitiaation: Ta 1~69a6a77a r.es~se 1.75 miles to the nest, Could potentially subject the area to groundshahing. The sit is also located in an area which is subSec~ to dam inundation in the event of a Vail Lake Dam failure. All structures ails conform to the stability standards established for groundshahing by the Uniform Building Code. Planning areas within the dam inundation limits sill be required to have building pads constructed above the 100 year flood plain. Existing natural slopes in soma portions of I the properly exceed 4~renty-five percent, which 45 the maximum buildable slope per County standards. The site may be subject to moderate erosion. Rost areas in excess of twenty-five percent slope sill remain as open space. s soils report determined that manufactured cut and rill slopes will be stable and that the erosion during and after construction can be controlled to acceptable levels .through. compliance with County Grading Standards. Grading occurring during the raigq season rill include mitigation measures such as sand 2 ,. 0 MRR-13-2002 17 43 FROM ~ ~ ~ 2 s 8 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 161 1S as 19 18 19 20 21 as 28 a~ as as 1r7 ~~ 28 I C. Flooding 1. Impact: 2. pill ag tion: IU 17YJ7b74b4"!"!A r.ew~~e bagging and desiltation basins as directed by the County Department of Building and Safety. Graded slopes aill be landscaped in accordance with County Grading Standards. datering trucks aill be used 4o control dust and temporary earthen dikes a111 be used along the perimeter of drainage courses to accordance aith the directives of the County Department of Building and Safety. A portion of the site is traversed by the 100-year flood plains of Temecula Creek and Pechanga Creek. A broad north-south gash passes through the site subjecting the golf course area of the property to some flooding. access could be cut off by the lack of °all aeather° creek and drainage course crossings. Development will increase surface runoff. Structures in the flood plain could be subject to flooding damage. Rreas subject to the 100-year flood plain of Temecula Creek and the broad north-south aash sill remain in open space. Improvements aill consist of the installation of soft bottom channels, rip-rap where needed, some construction of storm drains and the 3 Mf O 4 3 6 7 8 9 10 la 12 1S la 15 O 16, 17 18 19 av al as a3 a~ 2S as a' ae iR-13-2002 17 43 FROM TO 19096946477tJ P.bSist~ elevation of atl building pads above 4he flood plain level. All flood control( improvements sill be constructed irk accordance with Flood Control and hater Conservation Distrlc4 recommendations. Construction of °all weather° access structures sill be required across Yemecula Creek at F1argarita Road, Butterfield Stage Road an8 Pala Road, and across the broad sash drainage course at E1 Chamisal and Flacho Roads. D, Noise: 1. Impact: Noise levels along State Highway 79 silt be approximately 65 dBA and greater at 155 feet from the centerline of the highway. Nois levels along Pala Road and Plargarita Roa northerly of El Chamisal Road sill typically he 65 dBA a4 155 fee4 from the centerline of 4he roads, 2. Flitiaation: Exterior noise levels sill be, reduced where necessary by the utiliaation of walls, berms, and tandscaping, or a combination thereof, Ynterior noise levels will be reduced by the utiliaation of si4e orientation, insulation, double pane windows and other construction methods as necessary, Specific mltigation,.l N i 1 i ;~ MRR-13-2002 17 43 .~ II 1 2 3 3 G 7 e 9 to it a2 13 1+6' 16 is 17 is 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S as 2~ FROM I E. Water Quality 1. Imaact: 2. Mitigation: I U 17'lFJb74b4'! !A r. C1D~ JYJ measures sill be determined after acoustical studies are performed by a Certified acoustical engineer and all such measures identified as a result of those studies x111 be incorporated into future development approvals. Grading and construction operations will result in erosion and siltation. Upon completion of construction, urban runoff sill result in the introduction of some oils and pollutants into the groundwater. Erosion x111 be minimized by utilizing the measures outlined herein under the topic of slopes and erosion. Retention of a natural filtering system , will occur by the preservation of open space and °sof4 bottoms° in alt streams and drainage channels. The protect also includes several groundwater ~ recharge areas that x911 contribute to ' improvement of groundaater. Water for the projec4 will be provided by the Rancho California Water District and no private sells x111 be utilized. G~ ,.~ r O a FROM 1 F. Agriculture MRR-13-2002 17 44 ' II 3 S 6 7 8 8 10 as la 13 1~ 1s 0 as 1% is 19 ao 21 22 23 ?,d 23 26 29 a8 O IU 1Jb`Jby4b4'/'IR r.n ~i~n 1. Impact: Currently, limited cattle and sheep grazing is the only agricultural activity occurring on the subject site. Site development may indirectly and incrementally result in the transition of the nearby sod faem to urban uses. However, the sod farm and Vail Ranch are currently being proposed as specific plan 2. Fiitigation: 6. dildlife and Vegeta4lon 1. I~act: areas. the subject site does no4 meet the Riverside County General Plan criteria with respect to agricultural preservation. Continued agricultural activity on the subject site is not cost effective or practical due to rising land values, cost of Irrigation and the lisited natural agricultural potential of the subject site. A land use buffer sill. be constructed between Planning Areas 1, 2, 6 and 18 adjacent to the sod farm and citrus grove to provide an appropriate land use transition. Site development will eliminate most. of the existing vegetation. Some animal species, sill leave or 6e eliminated from the site and others wilt remain on the property but at a reduced population. 6 li; 0 0 MRR-13-2662 17 44 1 II 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 l0 al la as 1Q 15 16 17 16 19 20 al 22 23 26 25 26 29 28 FRUM 2. Fiitigation- IU 1JbJbJ4b4'!'!A Y.btl/SV~ The subject site is dominated ~ by non-native grassland, coastal sage scrub and riparian areas. The riparian habitat is limited to the Temecula Creek sash. No rare and/or endangered plant or plan4 communities acre I found on the subject site. The subject proper9sy. 1s located within the historic habitat range of the threatened Stephens Kangaroo Rat. Live trappings did not reveal the presence of this species. The site has limited areas of raptor foraging and perching, in addition to potential habitat for the San Diego Horned Lizard. The San Diego Horned Lizard is listed as sensitive per the Natural Diversity Data Base. The natural bottom of Temecula Creek will be retained, thereby preserving San Diego Horned Lizard habitat. Raptor habitat will be enhanced through the Preservation of several existing oak trees, the planting of specimen trees al thin the buffer areas, and through participation in the biological enhancement program. All anticipated impacts ,tan be mitigated to a level of insignificance through the preservation of open space, landscape treatments and biological enhancemen4 areas. 7 i O O MHR-13-2002 17 44 • ~ II 1 2 3 6 7 e 9 l0 11 12 aa' 1~ 1S 16 1~ la 19 zo al zz 28 4~ 2S 26 a~i FROM N. Ener 1. Fact: 2. pi4lgation• r IU 17k'17b74b4'/'!A r. G`J~.]1~ Energy resources Gill be consumed in tao stages, short term and long term.. Short to consumption sill be limited to construction related activity. Long term consumption sill result at pro,~ect build-out from the use of automobiles, lighting, heating and other ~, domestic uses. The -above-referenced consumption sill cause ' no undue or unan4lcipated demands on local utility purveyors. Energy conservation measures x111 be achieved through shorter trip lengths, as a result of multiple land uses, Class II bike paths, and through compliance with Title 24 standards for all buildings and improvements. I. Historic and Prehistoric Resources 1. Impact: archaeological/historical site R1V - 364 sill be impacted by construction operations. Proposed site construction could impact potential paleontological resources associated with the Pauba formation. 2. gitigation: archaeological resources associated alth RIV - 364 sill be identified and salvaged by an ' archaeologist prior 4o construction operations, and grading operations sill be monitored, thereby fully mitigating potential O 28 II 8 C% c~ MRR-13-2002 17 44 (~ 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 9~ lol 11~, 12 13' lb 1S as 17 aei 19 20 21 22 23 a~ 28 26 27 ae FROM TO 19096946477tt P.10i30 archaeological/historical impacts. The paleontological impact sill be mitigated through observation and monitoring by a paleontologist during alt grading operations. J. Fiount Palomar S ecial Li htin District 1. Imoaet: The pro~ec4 site falls within the Mount Palomar Observatory Special Lighting area. Glare and shy glow impacts may occur at the observatory from street lighting and parking lot lighting treatments. 2. Mitigation: To mitigate potential glare and stcy gloa impacts to the Mount Palomar Observatory, the pro3ect is required to utillae lob pressure sodium vapor lighting in addition to various shielding requirements. K. Circulation 1. Imyact: a total of 33,688 average daily trips (ADT) and 292,555 vehicle miles travelled (VMT) sill be generated by the project. 2. Mitigation: On and off-site mitigation measures aill include street aidenings, construction of turn lanes and pockets, installation of traffic signals and stop signs and other measures as required to facilitate a smooth ftoa of traffic. The Rancho Villages Assessment District ai11 provide a financing mechanism for regional transportation 9 MRR-13-2002 17 45 FROM II 1 2 O 3 6 6 7 9 10~~ •11 12 13 1~ O 15 16 17 16 19 20 21 a2 23 26 as 26 27 O 28 I IL. dater and Seger 1. Impact: 2. Mitigation: TO 19096946477tt P.11/30 facilities and sill facilitate the orderly ' construction of backbone circulation infrastructure. Trip and mileage generatio will also be minimized through the mixed uses and on-Site 4r1p des4lnations provided by the protect. I , l~ , The project sill require approximately 2.76 million gallons of cater daily and generate 1.32 million gallons of aasteaater daily. Additionally the protect may utilise approximately 1,000,000 gallons of reclaimed cater for golf course purposes daily. Necessary facilities including transmission lines and a storage Yank for the higher elevations will be constructed by the Ranth Villages Assessment 0lstrict and the Rancho California Hater District. Expansion of the Eastern Municipal Hater District sewage treatment plant to 6.25 million gallons per day capacity is currently taking place in accordance alth the requirements of the San Diego Regional Hater Quality Control Board. The use of reclaimed water in the golf course sill also mitigate water supply impacts as it afll help to recharge the groundwater and conserve aster resources. 10 hWR-13-2002 17 45 ~~ 1 2 3 r, 3 6 7 e 9 to 11 12 13 16 15 is 17 18 19 20 ai 22 23 ?& as 26 I' a' as FROM 'lq. Fire 1. Impact: 2. gitiaation• N. Schools 1. Impact: TO 19096946477ri P.12/30 The Redhaak Specific Plan site receives fire protection from the Temecula Fire station operated jointly by the California Division of forestry and the Riverside Counllr Fire Department. The project, in conjunction with cumulative impacts, x111 result in a demand for , approximately. tao additional engine companies. The project is adjacent to a Hazardous Fire Area. Payment of fire mitigation fees on a per lot basis sill finance additional land, equipment, personnel-and fire stations or any combination 4hereof, as deemed appropriate by the County Fire Department. A minimum of a 1.25 acre site fora fire station facility shall be dedicated within Planning Area No. 20 per the County Fire Department's recommenda4lon. Fuel modification buffers and fire resistant landscaping requirements incorporated into the project x111 further mitigate fire hazard impacts. The project afll generate approximately 2,015 elementary and middle school students, and 733 high school students. 11 O O MHK-13-~{JVJ2 1745 FROM II 2 3 S 8 7 9 ao as as as 18 1ST 16 S7 d8 19 ~0 al ~2 2S 23 ~6 28 II l0 19d96946477ti P.13/30 2. Mitigation: The project site is located in the Temecula Union School District. Said district' expansion program sill enable the Temec tlalley High School facility to absorb the increased student load. Three potential elementary school sites are included in the , land use development plan of the specific ~• plan. School fees sill be paid as required •., by State laa. I~ 0. Parks 1. Imyact: 2. Ftitioation• P. Utilities 1. Ya~pact: The subject specific plan, at full build-out, is anticipated to generate a population of approximately 8,795 individuals. Said population increase sill contribute to the present demand placed upon original and loc~ recreational resources, Facilities provided in 4he development plan include 27.1 acres of path land, a 17.6 acre regional park, a 182.7 acre golg course, bicycle and equestrian trails, and approximately 150 acres of open space. The utility purveyors have demonstrated an abili4y to provide the specific plan development with an adequate supply of electricity, telephone service and natural gas to meet the anticipated demand. 12 r rwK-is-zees iv: n5 rKUr~ ~~ a 2 3 S 9 ao as i2 13 as lg as b7 b6 19 20 as as 23 23 28 26 27 28 2. F1iti~ion• Q. bisaster Preparedness 1. ]mpact: 2. Riiti9ation: R. Nealth Services 1. Impact: 2. {Miti4ation: S. Alraorts 1. Impact: iu i7e7by4bn rra r.ini.se No mitigation required. The proposed pro~ec4 sill be adequately accessible to all emergency vehicles and will not hamper the implementation of the Riverside County Disaster Preparedness Plan. Redhaak's participation in the Rancho Villages Assessment District (RVAD) rill provide improvements to the area's circulation network through road and bridge construction and improvements. Said improvements will translate to a positive impact to the area. No mitigation required. The Redhagk Specific Plan x111 not cause undue or unanticipated increases in the need for hospital care or emergency care facilities in the area. Local health care facilities are expected to meet aqy Increased demand in 4he area. No mitigation required. The Redhawk Specific Plan may result in an ~lncremental demand for additional airport services. 13 1'IHK-IJ-GGYJG rr ~ 4o rKUri i u 17197bJ9b4'('!{i r. isise II ~ O O O 1~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1~ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. piitigation: A replacement site for the Rancho California '~ Airport is currently under construction. ~~yI BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that the adversa".. regional air quality impact associated with Specific Plan No. 217, which is '~ ,:: irore particularly described in EIR No. 226, cannot be fully mitigated despite the inclusion of all available mitigation measures into the project, and a statement of overriding findings is therefore included herein. The mitigation 'I Measures, which will partially avoid or lessen the air quality impact, include w t are not limited to, on-site trip destinations, bicycle trails, trip length seductions, park and ride spaces, and the payment of air quality enhancement `ees. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors 4ha4 it has considered ind rejected as infeasible the following alternatives identified in E1R No. 226 ` ~elative to cumulative impacts on air quality which canno4 be fully mitigated: j ~. No Protect Alternative of °Site develoyed under current approvals: Th~~ No Project Alternative was considered relative to cumulative effects on: I air quality and has been rejected as infeasible for the following reasons: ~ 1. The No Project/Curren4 Approvals Alternative would allow the .previously approved specific plan project consisting of 1370 dwelling units to be constructed. I 2. The No Project/Current Approvals Alternative would not provide active recreational amenities. 3. The No Project/Current Approvals Alternative would not provide for ~ community oriented commercial uses. 4. The No Protect/Current Approvals Alternative would allow the construction of 'a septic tank and leach system on individual lots, • 14 MRR-13-2002 17 46 FROM 1 2 3 5 s O n IU 170`JbJ4b4'f/A Y.lb/30 creating potential leach field problems and possible groundwater contamination. 3. No Project Alternative of "Entire site remains in present use": The No Project/Existing Use Alternative gas considered relative to cumulative effects on air quality and has been rejected as infeasible for the following reasons: 1. The No Project/Existing Use Alternative could not produce the fees and taxes projected to result from Specific Plan No. 211 and would not, therefore, provide an economic benefit 40 4he County. 2. .the No Project/Existing Use Alternative could not make a meaningful Contribution to the County employment base. 3. The No Project/Existing Use Alternative could result in the piecemeal development of the site, potentially exacerbating impacts to the adjacent Indian Reservation and agricul4ural uses. 4. The No Project/Existing Use Alternative could not alloa for the completion of a full spectrum of infrastructure improvements such as those associated with Specific Plan No. 217 through its participation in the Rancho Villages Assessment District (RVAD). 5. The No Project/Existing Use Alternative could not reduce the already. existing housing need created by rapid area population growth. Previous Design Alternative: The Previous Design Alternative aas~ considered relative to cumulative effects on air quallgy and has been rejected as infeasible for the following reasons: 1. The Previous Design Alternative provides less acreage for parks, schools, and commercfal development than the proposed Specific Ptan No. 217. :i 9 to 11 12 13 1~ 15 15 17 18 19 2G~ al 22 23 2~ 15 25 2s 27 as MRR-13-2002 17 46 •~ II i 211 O 3, O O 5 6 7 81 9 to 11 12 13 19 15 18 1~ 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 23 26 27 28 ~. FROM TO 1909694647'7# P.17/30 2. The Previous Design Alternative does not include the integration of r major recreational facilities, such as a golf course included in the^~ proposed specific plan design. ..l`` 3. The Previous Design Alternative includes a septic tank/leach system with more potential impacts than the sewer system proposed in Specific Plan No. 217. ,~ Mixed Use Alternative: The Rlixed Use Alternative aas considered relative .I to cumulative effects on air quality and has been rejected as infeasible .. for the following reasons: 1. The plixed Use Alternative would have more Impacts than the other alternatives because of more intense residential, commercial and industrial development. 2. The Mixed Use Alternative -could oversaturate the market area with commercial and industrial development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that it has balanced benefits of the proposed project against the unavoidable adverse ronmental effects thereof, to alt: the cumula4lve air quality impaet, and determined that the.folloaing benefits outweigh and render acceptable those ronmental effects: i The protected revenue from the project provides an economic benefi4 to the County in the amount of $4,259,208 at project bulld~out. I Social benefits attributable to the project include social access opportunities resulting from the planned Improvement of public infrastructure related to cater and sewer service, circulation facilities, fire protection, flood control, educational facilities, recreation facilities and open space. 16 ~' I I .~ .. :~ 0 MRR-13-2092 17 46 FROM IU 17~77b79b9'!'(R Y. 1LV 31'J 1 C. Economic benefits attributable to the project include positive economic 2 impacts to the Rancho California area, resulting from an increase in 3 construction jobs, and tax and employment opportunity related to ~ industrial and commercial growth which will be induced by the project. 5 D. The Specific Plan proposes the creation of a Biological Enhancement s ~ program and is also providing 45.9 acres of park sites for the project ~ residents. The amount of park sites is in excess of that which would be g required under the Quimby Act and can also be utilized by residen~, 9 alreaQy in 4he community. l0 E. The project proponent has also agreed to sign a Development Agreement 11 which sill generate revenue in the amount of 817.912.076 for Public 12 facilities, Regional Parks, Nabita4/Open Space and for Service Offset. 13 F. The project provides three school sites which will benefit area-aide ( 1,1 educational facilities. 15 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors 4ha4 Specific Plan No. 1B 211 sill implement applicable elements of the Riverside County Comprehensive lq General Plan as follows: 18 A. Land Use Element: The Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan ig recognizes the project area as transitioning from agricultural land uses Zp to urban land uses and an urban economic base and that this area can be 21 expected to experience increased urbanization. The Redhawk Specific Plan 22 project is located in the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area. 2S This area is characterized by urban land uses and corridors along 2~ Interstate 15, specifically in the Rancho California-Temecula area. a5 Adopted Specific Plans in the area include.Holf Valley Specific Plan and ag Pala Villages Specific Plan. The project is adjacent to the Rancho 27 Villages Community Policy Area. Densities and land uses proposed by 28 ' 17 MRR-13-2002 17 46 FROM TO 190969464'77u h'.lyi3e ' Specific Plan No. 217 are similar to those already permitted and proposed I ~ i by other specific plans in the area. The applicant is also participatfn O 2 in the Rancho dillages Assessment District for infrastructure improvemer 3 and for its financing mechanism. In terms of available and proposed l . . infrastructure and the existing pattern of urban development, the subSec: . 5 site meets the qualifications for. Category II (urban) land use policies at e this time. 7 I B. Administrative Element: The project provides a fiscal impact report and ; e time frames for development, pursuant to the land use polices of the 9 Administrative Element. The fiscal impact analysis projects a positive. l0 impact on County services at project build-out. Further, the project sill 11 pdY Countyalde mitigation and impact fees through a development agreement. 12 aith the County and sill make substantial contributions to the County's 13 facilities and service accounts. ' 1~ I C. Regional Element: This project represents approximately 6.2 percent of t 15 O groath expected in the Southwest Territory Land Use Planning Area (RSA-4 16 for the year 2010. Specific Plan Wo. 217 alone sill not exceed the SCA6~ 19 9roath forecasts. The project provides for commercial and residential land 18 19 uses aithin its boundary. I 0. Public Facilities and Services Element: The project contains a 20 21 comprehensive public services and facilities program for circulation, 22 aster, seaer, fire protection and other services. An urban level of. 23 infrastructure is presently aithin reach of the subject site and sill be 2~ provided per the Rancho Villages Assessment District. ' E. Housing Element: TAe proposed Specific Plan sill provide approximately 2S 4,188 residential units with a variety of product types. The project also 'I 26 27 includes about 45.9 acres of parks. 182.7 acres of golf course, 28.0 acres O 28 16 0 0 a r MRR-13-2002 17 47 ~~ 1 2 3' 41 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1~ 15 16 17 la 19 20 al 2z 23 2d 25 as 27 28 FROM TO 1999694Ci4'!'!ii Y. G17~3b of commercial land uses, 32.2 acres of school sites, and about 150 acres of open space. F. Environmental HaTards and Resources Element: EIR No. 226 assessed the full range of concerns associated with this project and proposed mitigation for each of the identified impacts. Overriding findings are required for air quality, and are included herein. BE I7 FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that it has reviewed and considered EIR No. 226 in evaluating Specific Plan No. 211, that EIR No. 226 is an accurate and objective statemen4 that complies with the California Environmental Quality Act, that EIR No. 226 is certified, and that EIR No. 226 is hereby incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that Specific Plan No. 217, on fate with the Clerk of the Board, including the final conditions of approval and euhibits, is hereby adopted as the Specific Plan of Land Use fore the real property shown on the plan, and said real property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the specific plan, unless the plan is repealed or amended by the Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors that copies of Specific Plan No. 217 shall be placed on file in the Office of the Clerk of the Board, in the Office of the Planning Director and in the Office of the Director of Building and Safety, and that no applications for subdivision maps, conditional use permits or other development approvals shall be accepted for the real property shown on Specific Plan No. 217, unless such applications are substantially in accordance therewith. Roll Call resulted as follows: Ayes: Ceniceros, Larson, Younglove and Abraham Noes: None Absent: Dunlap RG:US:CO:mcb:mp Date: October 6, 1986 - Thursday stn IotaQslRZ M wrtii'ad M ~ 0 ~ ~ gar rosoaroon e~i cdo.-~ 19 tllyors the dste the 1oM ~~~ t v, ca•u e1 wed ®e~:a ~v///.~ i-:o~ 0 0 0 MRR-13-2002 17.47 FROM l O 19{9967464'f /ti Y. zl/SV~ 0 0 0 MRR-13-2002 17 47 FROM r n N ®(lJ ~ r11• ll rt n ~,p ~ p~ TO 190969464776 ~y~ 11u11 V ~i~.~~~~ TRANSPORTATIONAND ,LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY Richard K Loshbrook Ageney Director March 16, 2001 TO: Hunsaker & Associates, Inc. 2900 Adams Street, Suite A-15 Riverside, CA 92504 r'. f1/Sb A(eta J. Laurence, A.I.C.P. Planning Director RE: Specific Plan Rto. 297, Amendment No.1 1 Change of Zone No. 6493 /Tentative Tract flHap No. 292031 Tentative Yract flflap Rlo. 29432 and Plot Plan No. 16554 Environmental Assessment Plo. 37825 Regional Team Wo. 2 On December 19.2000, the Riverside County ~ Board of Supervisors ^ Planning Director took the following action on the above referenced parcel map: ® APPROVED specific plan, change of zone, tentative tract maps and plot plan subject to the conditions located in the LMS (Sierra System), no waiver request submitted. ^ DENIED tentative map based on the attached findings. ^ APPROVED tentative map subject to attached conditions and DENIED request for waiver of the final map. The action on the above mentioned cases are considered final. Gonditions for the above mentioned cases are available in the Land Management System. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Aleta J. Laurence, .P., Planning Director ~~ Keith E. Gardner, Senior Planner RivrBidc ORcc • 4080 Lcmon Strait. 9th Floor Indirr Omee • 82.675 Hwy 111.2nd Floor Murtieta Oftite •39493 Los Alamos Road P. 0. Box 1409 • Riverside, California 92502-1409 Rm 209, Indio. Caliromia 92201 Murricla. Callromla 92363 (909) 955-3200 • FAX (909) 955-3157 (760) 863-7055 • FAX (760) 863-7015 (909) 600.6170 • FAX (909) 600-6145 MRR-13-2002 17:47 FROM 03/19/01 ~~~ ~~ Riverside Coun ,0~08~:~52 CONDITIONS OF ( )IFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS EVERY DEPARTMENT 10. EVERY. 1 _ SP - HOLD HARMLESS The applicant or any successor-in-interest shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside (COUNTY), its agents, officers, or employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTY, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul an approval of the COUNTY, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning SPECIFIC PLAN N0. 217, AMENDMENT NO. 1. The COUNTY will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the COUNTY and will cooperate fully in the defense. if the COUNTY fails to promptly notify the subdividez of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the COUNTY. SP - SP PROJECT DESCRIPTION 10..EVERY. 2 Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1, shall consist of the following: a. Exhibit "A": Specific Plan Text. b. Exhibit "B": Specific Plan Conditions of Approval. c. Exhibit "C": Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 236. d. Exhibit "D": Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 236. If any specific plan conditions of approval differ from the specific plan text oz' exhibits, the specific plan conditions of approval shall take precedence. 10. EVERY. 3 SP - DEFINITIONS The words identified in the following list that"appear in all capitals in the attached conditions of Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1 shall be henceforth defined as follows: LMS IU 1J{~:Jby4b4"I"!A APPROVED el: 952-230-0( DEC 19 2000 I". GJ/J19 Page: 1 BY BOARp OF SUPERVISORS INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT SPECIFIC PLAN = Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1. CHANGE OF ZONE = Change of Zone No. 6493 MRR-13-2002 17:48 FROM TO 191J969464'('(i{ F'. 24/S{7 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 2 OB:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~IFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-OOB 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS 10. EVERY. 4 SP - ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS The development of the property shall, be in accordance with the mandatory requirements of all Riverside County ordinances including Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460 and state laws; and shall conform substantially with the adopted SPECIFIC PLAN as filed in the office of the Riverside County Planning Department, unless otherwise amended. 10. EVERY. 5 No portion to change, requirement part of the 10. EVERY. 6 No portion to change, O requirement part of th 10. EVERY. 7 SPA - Amendment Description This Specific Plan Amendment alters Specific Plan No. 217 by amending the development standards of Planning Areas 12, 13, 15, 16, 20, and 21 to allow 5,000 square foot minimum lot size single family detached subdivisions of patio homes, zero lot line and z-lot configurations, and/or residential planned developments and multiple family residential developments. In addition, this Specific Plan Amendment alters the Land Use Map of Specific Plan No. 217 by: 1. Enlarging Planning Area (PA) 20 from 41.5 acres to 53.3 acres by changing the land use designation for the 5.2-acre Commercial Site "C" (PA 27) and 6.6 acres of School Site "B" (PA 23 consisting of 9.6 acres) to Medium High Density Residential (MH, 8-14 DU/AC) and incorporating these planning areas into a reconfigured and expanded PA 20. 2. Enlarging Planning Area 33 (Park Site "E") from 12.0 acres to 15.0 acres by changing the land use designation for 3.0 acres of School Site "B" (PA 23) to Park Site "E" and adding these 3.0 acres into a reconfigured and expanded PA 33. SP - LIMITS OF SP DOCUMENT of the SPECIFIC PLAN which purports or proposes waive or modify any ordinance or other legal for the development shall be considered to be adopted specific plan. SP - COMPLY WITH AGENCIES of the SPECIFIC PLAN which purports or proposes waive or modify any ordinance or other legal for the development shall be considered to be e adopted specific plan. INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 17:48 FROM lU 1`J19`Jb`J464'rru r.eo~se 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 3 ,0,8:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (u IIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 ~~~ 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS 10. EVERY. 7 SPA - Amendment Description (Cont.) INEFFECT 3. Changing the land use designation of School Site "C" (PA 24) to Medium Low Density (2.0-5.0 DU/AC) Residential, and changing the location of 11.0-acre School Site "C" (PA 24) from the south side of Camino San Dimas to a new PA 24 location consisting of 9.5-acres on the north side of Camino San Dimas in Planning Area 2 which will result in a reconfigured PA 2 that expands from 129.1 acres to 131.5 acres. (Amended by Planning Commission on August 23, 2000.) 10. EVERY, 8 This Specific Plan Amendment is intended to replace the original SPECIFIC PLAN, and all amendments and substantial conformances to the SPECIFIC PLAN. All future developments within the SPECIFIC PLAN, whether or not they have a direct ..correlation to this Amendment, will inherit these conditions. The original SPECIFIC PLAN and all previous amendments and substantial conformances to the SPECIFIC PLAN will be electronically "locked" so that all future land development applications comply with the conditions of Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. i. SPA - Replace all previous INEFFECT BS GRADE DEPARTMENT 10.85 GRADE. 1 SP - GIN INTRODUCTION INEFFECT Improvements such as grading, filling, over excavation and recompaction, and base and paving which require a grading permit are subject to the included Building and Safety Department Grading Division conditions of approval. lO.HS GRADE. 2 SP*GSP-1 ORD. NOT SUPERSEDED Anything to the contrary, proposed by this Specific Plan, shall not supersede the following: All grading shall conform to the Uniform Building code, County General Plan, Ordinance 457 and all other relevant laws, rules and regulations governing grading in Riverside County. lO.BS GRADE. 3 SP*GSP-2 GEO/SOIL TO BE OBEYED INEFFECT INEFFECT A11 grading shall be performed in accordance with the recommendations of the included -County approved- geotechnieal/soils reports for this Specific Plan. MRR-13-2002 17:.48 FROM TO 19096946477# 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL y~'~IpIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 10 GENERAL CONDITIONS 10.HS GRADE. 4 SP- MASS GRADING If mass grading of the entire Specific Plan site is proposed - usually under a parcel map for the entire site at the same time that application foT further subdivisions are being made, an exception to Ordinance 460, Section 4.Sb shall be obtained from the Planning Director - Ord. 460 Section 3.1 - prior to issuance of the mass grading permit. 10.B5 GRADE. 5 y-ALL CLEARNC'S REQ'D B-4 PMT Prior to issuance of a grading permit, all certifications affecting grading. shall have written clearances. This includes, but is not limited to, additional environmental assessments, erosion control plans, geotechnical/soils reports, and departmental clearances. O E HEALTH DEPARTMENT 10.E HEALTH. 1 SP - COMMENTS This Department has received and reviewed the request for Amendment 1 to amend planning areas 12,13,15,20,21,23,24and 27 to allow single-family detached subdivisions of patio homes. This amendment also proposes to change the land use for TR 230676-1 from comercial to medium-high density and incorporate it into TR 29203 and TR 29432. 10.E HEALTH. 2 SP ~ Al COMMENTS Department of Environmental Health has received SP00217A1 and have no objections. The Rancho California Water District and the Eastern Municipal Water District will be required to provide will service letters at time of issuance for a Sanitation Form 53 for the respective tracts. The requested Amended Planning areas 12,13,15,16,20-24 and 27 will allow SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING subdivisions of patio homes, with zero lot line and 2 lot configurations. This will also propose to change the land use for PA27 (Recorded as TR 23067-1) from commercial to medium-high density and incorporate it into PA20. Parcel: 952-230-008 P.26/30 Page: 4 INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 17:49 FROM TO 19096946477J7 P. 2'I/Sb .03/19/01 Riverside County LMS 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 9~`CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 S0. GENERAL CONDITIONS PARKS DEPARTMENT lO.PARKS. 1 SP - TRAIL CORRIDOR All projects in planning areas 19 and 20 that abut the watercourse along the north side of the specific plan shall provide for a trails corridor easement within that watercourse area. PLANNING DEPARTMENT lO.PLANNING. 1 SP - REQUIRED FOR AMENDMENTS Any amendment tb the SPECIFIC PLAN, even though it may affect only one portion of the specific plan, shall be accompanied by a complete specific plan document, in both paper and electronic formats, which includes the entire specific plan, including both changed and unchanged parts. lO.PLANNING. 2 SP -'MAINTAIN AREAS & PHASES O All planning area and phase numbers shall be maintained throughout the life of the SPECIFIC PLAN, unless changed through the approval of a specific plan amendment accompanied by a revision Eo the complete specific plan document. lO.PLANNZNG. 3 SP - NON-IMPLEMENTING MAPS A land division filed for the purposes of phasing or financing shall not be considered an implementing development application for the purposes of the Planning Department's conditions of approval. lO.PLANNING. 4 SP - DUAL WATER SYSTEM Dual water systems shall be provided in common open space areas for the use of reclaimed water when made available by the water district. AS OF 03/07/01, THIS CONDITION IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT. lO.PLANNING. 5 SP - 90 DAYS TO PROTEST The project applicant has 90 days from the date of approval of these conditions to protest, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code Section 66020, the imposition of any and all fees, dedications, reservations Page: 5 INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT MAR-13-2002 17:49 FROM lu 1JYJ7b74b9"!"!A r.zcv~n b3/19/O1 Riverside County LMS Page: 6 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ~IFIC-PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS lO.PLANNING. 5 SP - 90 DAYS TO PROTEST (cont.) and/or other exactions imposed on this project as a result of the approval or conditional approval of this project. AS OF 03/07/01, THIS CONDITION OF APPROVAL IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT lO.PLANNING. 6 SP - RECYCLING PROGRAM All implementing development pxoposals shall be reviewed by the Riverside County Waste esources Management District for compliance with Riverside County recycling requirements. AS OF 03/07/01, THIS CONDITION OF APPROVAL IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT. lO.PLANNING. 7 SP - NO P.A. DENSITY TRANSFERS O Density transfers between Planning Areas within the SPECIFIC PLAN shall not be permitted, except through the Specific Plan Amendment process. AS OF 3/12/01, THIS CONDITION OF APPROVAL IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT. TRANS DEPARTMENT lO.TRANS. 6 SP - SP217A1/IMPROVEMENTS A11 road improvements within the project boundaries shall be constructed to ultimate County standards in accordance with Ordinance No. 460 and 461 as a requirement of the implementing subdivisions for the Specific Plan, subject to approval of the Director of Transportation. lO.TRANS. 7 SP - SP217A1/T.S.M The project proponent shall participate in the Traffic signal Mitigation Program as approved by the Soard of supervisors. Any landscaping within public" road rights-of-way will require approval by the Director of Transportation and assurance of continuing maintenance through the lO.TRANS. 8 SP - SP217A1/LANDSCAPING INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 17:49 FROM TO 19096946477ti r.eyise 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 7 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ~FIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 10. GENERAL CONDITIONS lO.TRANS. 8 SP - SP217A1/LANDSCAPING (cont.) INEFFECT establishment of a landscape maintenance district or similar mechanism as approved by the Director of Transportation. lO.TRANS. 13 SP - SP217A1/BIKE LANES INEFFECT While the current General Plan designates Class II bike lanes on Highway 79, the projected traffic volumes clearly indicate that bike lanes are no longer approproate for this facility. It is recommended that this facility be redesignated as a Class I bikeway located on a separate right-of-way adjacent to the highway. The Class II bike lanes suggested within the specific plan are not adequate or acceptable as a bike lane plan. However, the developer may submit a cohesive plan of Class II bike lanes to the Traffic Engineering Section of the Transportation Department for review and approval. Any portions of the proposed bike lane network that are approved or required, whether on existing roads or roads to be constructed, shall be created or implemented by the developer at no expense to the County. 20. PRIOR TO A CERTAIN DATE PLANNING DEPARTMENT 20.PT,ANNING. 1 SP - SUBMIT FINAL SP DOCUMENT INEFFECT Within sixty (60) days of the adoption of the final Soard of Supervisors resolution, or prior to the submittal of any applications or the issuance of any permits, whichever comes first, fifteen (15) copies of the final specific plan document shall be submitted to the Planning Department for distribution. The documents shall include the final Board of Supervisors resolution, the final specific plan conditions of approval and zoning ordinance, all changes required by these conditions of approval or made during the public hearings on the project, if any, and the Final EIR. A detailed list of required items and their order can be obtained from the Planning Department. 20.PLANNING. 2 SP - DURATION OF SP VALIDITY INEFFECT ~{ The SPECIFIC PLAN shall remain valid for 15 years from date v of Board of Supervisiors adoption of a resolution approving MAR-13-2002 17:50 FRDM lU 1`JV~`Jby464'/'fA r. 5101 Jf7 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 8 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ~FIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 20. PRIOR TO A CERTAIN DATE 20.PLANNING. 2 SP - DURATION OF SP VALIDITY (cont.) INEFFECT Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1. Should the entire project not be substantially built out in that period of time, the project proponent shall file an application for a specific plan amendment to extend the maximum life of the specific plan. For the purpose of this condition of approval, substantial buildout shall be defined as the issuance of the 3,75oth building permit. The specific plan amendment shall update the entire specific plan document to reflect current development requirements. Should this time period lapse without substantial build out or without the approval of an amendment extending this time period, the SPECIFIC PLAN shall become null and void 15 years from the date of Board adtoption of a resolution approving Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1. 2p,pLANNING. 3 SP - PARK SITE "E" REQUIREMEN INEFFECT The design of Park Site "E" shall be reviewed by the Planning Department for consistency with Specific Plan 217 (SP217) and the active park site shall.be in accordance with CSA 143 Park Standards and approved by CSA 143. The total area of Park Site "E" shall be Fifteen (15) acres in size and shall consist of active and passive recreational areas. Twelve (12) acres were originally included in SP217. Park Site "E" was augmented by an additional three (3) acres, due to an admendment to $P217 to adjust densities and uses as a result of revised land uses. Within ninety (90) days of the Park Site "E" concept approval by the Board of Supervisors, permit drawings shall be completed and grading germits obtained. Fifteen (15) copies of the final Park Site "E" plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and cSA 143 for approval prior to submittal of plans for a grading permit. Within six (6) months of the Park Site "E" concept approval by the Board of Supervisors, an agreement shall be completed detailing the responsibilities of each entity that will have maintenance responsibilities for any active, passive or natural areas. Any additonal maintenance Costs for the area identified as the River Walk shall be incurred by the adjacent planning areas not yet developed as of January 1, 2001, or other means acceptable to the County of Riverside. Within one year of the Park Site "E" concept approval by the Board of Supervisors, all construction, rnra a zu MRR-13-2002 18 08 FROM TO 190%946477# P.01/Z4 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 9 /0-8:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL _ ~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 r 20. PRIOR TO A CERTAIN DATE 20.PLANNING. 3 SP - PARR SITE "E" REQUIREMEN (cont.) INEFFECZ subject to CSA 143 acceptance, shall be completed with final dedication to CSA 143. The Park Site "E" shall include the following elements: a twenty-four (24') foot wide access road from Channel Street leading down the hill to a parking lot that will accommodate a minimum of seven (7) automobiles, one of which shall be handicapped accessible; a two (2) acre active park that will include picnic tables, benches, lighting, water fountains, and a tot lot that includes equipment acceptable to CSA 143; a 2.5 acre grass play area that will be leveled, landscaped and irrigated for use as an active play field; and a three (3) acre, fifty (50) foot wide minimum, River walk, which shall include a jogging path bordered by landscaped (trees, shrubs and turf) and irrigated areas on either side. The River walk area shall run parallel to the loo year flood plain between the sloped areas and the natural areas from Butterfield Stage Road to the Park Site "E" play areas. An equestrian trail shall be located outside the River Walk area and shall follow the natural area around the play fields in Park Site "E" and continue in a southernly direction beyond Park Site "E". The projected groundbreaking date for Park Site "E^ shall be April 1, 2001 and the projected completion date for the park shall be January 1, 2002. TRANS DEPARTMENT 20.TRANS. 1 SP - SP217A1/EASEMENT/GP ROAD INEFFECT Within 180 days of the Board of Supervisors' adoption of Specific Plan 217A1, the project proponent shall provide assistance in the procurement of a Grant of Easement for the extention of Butterfield Stage Road through the intersection of Nighthawk Pass southerly to the Specific Plan boundary, to be in compliance with the current Public Facilities Services Element of the General Plan. All exhibits within the Specific Plan shall be revised to delineate this roadway. G MRR-13-2002 18:08 FROM TO 19096946477p P.02i24 03/19/01 08:52 Riverside County LMS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL l ~.CiFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 30 PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Parcel: 952-230-008 30.PLANNING. 1 SP - COMPLETE CASE APPROVALS Prior to approval of any entative subdivision or parcel map or approval of any plot plan or use permit, the SPECIFIC PLAN, the COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, the CHANGE OF ZONE, and the DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall, be effective. O 30.PLANNING. 2 SP - PARK AGENCY REQUIRED Prior to the submittal of any subdivision map, or other residential development application, all portions of the SPECIFIC PLAN not currently within the boundaries of County Service Area No. 143 or a similar entity such as a County Service Area/District that has been designated by the Board of Supervisors, pursuant to Section 10.35 (G) of Ordinance No. 460, to receive park dedications and fees. Documentation of said annexation shall accompany all implementing residential development applications. 30.PLANNING. 7 SP - COMMON AREA PLANS Design plane for the common areas specifying the location and extent of landscaping and irrigation systems as specified in Riverside County Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.12, and Sections 19.300 through 19.304, and circulation (vehicular, pedestrian, equestrian and/or bicycle) shall be submitted during the review process for development applications, which incorporate common areas. Additionally, all proposed structures shall be shown on said plans. Aland division filed for the purposes of phasing or financing shall not be considered an implementing development application. O 30.PLANNING. 9 SP - EA REQUIRED An environment assessment shall be conducted co determine potential environmental impacts resulting from each tract, change of zone, plot plan, specific plan amendment, or any other discretionary permit required to implement the SPECIFIC PLAN, unless said proposal is determined to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. The environmental assessments shall be prepared as part of the review process for these implementing projects. At a minimum, the environmental assessment shall utilize the evaluation of impacts Page: 10 INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 18:08 FROM TO 19096946477p P. 03/24 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 11 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL /"~`~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 9 SP - EA REQUIRED (Cont.) addressed in the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the SPECIFIC PLAN. 30.PLANNING. 10 SP - SPECIAL STUDIES REQUIRED The following special studies/reports shall accompany implementing development applications in the planning areas listed below: Study / Report Planning Area a. Liquefaction and subsidence 9, 12, 15 & 16 b. Fault evaluation study 9, 12, 13, 15, 16 & 17 j. Other (as determined by subsequent All Planning Areas environmental assessments) 30.PLANNING. 11 SP - MITIGATION MONITORING EXHIBIT C MITIGATION MONITORING An amendment to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), codified as Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, required the preparation of a program to ensure that all mitigation measures are fully and completely implemented. The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the SPECIFIC PLAN, imposes certain mitigation measures on the project. Certain conditions of approval for the SPECIFIC PLAN constitute self contained reporting / monitoring programs for certain mitigation measures. At the time of approval of subsequent development applications, further environmental reporting / monitoring programs will be established to ensure that all mitigation measures are appropriately implemented. 30.PLANNING. 12 SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Prior to the approval of any land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.) containing any common areas identified in.the specific plan, a condition of approval shall be applied to the land division or development permit to ensure that they are owned and maintained as follows: INEFFECT INEFFECT TNEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 18 09 FROM TO 19096946477# P.0424 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 12 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OCIFIC PLAN Case #= SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 12 SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE (cont.? a. A permanent master maintenance organization shall be established for the specific plan area, to assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for all common recreation, open space, circulation systems and landscaped areas. The organization may be public or private. Merger with an area-wide or regional organization shall satisfy this condition provided that such organization is legally and financially capable of assuming the responsibilities for ownership and maintenance. If the organization is a private association then neighborhood associations shall be established for each residential development, where required, and such associations may assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for neighborhood common areas. 0 b. unless otherwise provided for in these conditions of approval, common open areas shall be conveyed to the maintenance organization as implementing development is approved or any subdivision as recorded. INEFFECT c. The maintenance organization shall be established prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the first land division, or issuance of any building permit for any approved development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.)_ 30.PLANNING. 13 SP - CLEARANCE INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any land division or development permit within the specific plan which will disturb habitat occupied by the California Gnatcatcher, the land division and/or the development permit shall have conditions applied to them which require the following: C Prior to the issuance of any grading permit or recordation of any final map the applicant shall obtain written approval from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to "take" habitat occupied by the California Gnatcatcher (POlioptila californica californica). Said approval shall be obtained through the initiation of a consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973; approval by the Secretary of the Interior of a 10 (a) Permit pursuant to Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973; or participation in the Natural Community Conservation Planning program established by the State of California. MRR-13-2002 18 09 FROM TO 1909694647713 P.05/24 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 13 OB:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - QCIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-23.0-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 14 SP - PARK & RECREATION FEES INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any residential land division or residential development application (e.g. use permit, plot plan, etc.) within any Planning Area, a condition of approval shall be applied to the implementing project requiring that prior to any building permit final inspection the developer shall present certification to the County Planning Department that dedication and acceptance of improved land for park use to Riverside County Administrative Office for CSA No. 143 or similar entity authorized to accept park land. (Amended by Planning Commission on August 9, 2000.) 30.PLANNING. 15 SP - MEET PHASE CONDITIONS INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any implementing land division or development application, a condition shall be placed on O that project requiring that, prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the construction of any use Contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall first obtain clearance from the Riverside County Planning Department that all pertinent conditions of approval have been satisfied for the specific plan for the phase of development in question. 30.PLANNING. 16 SP - PLANNING AREA LEGAL INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.) within the SPECIFIC PLAN, a condition of approval shall be applied requiring that, prior to the recordation of any final map or issuance of any building permit within a Planning Area of said specific plan, the first applicant, or their successor-in-interest, for a final map or building permit within each Planning Area shall submit to the Planning Department correct legal descriptions for the Planning Area(s) within which the proposed project is located. 30.PLANNING. 17 SP - SCHOOL MITIGATION INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any implementing land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.), a condition of approval shall be applied to said implementing development requiring that impacts to the Temecula Valley Unified School District will be mitigated in accordance with California State law and the existing school MRR-13-2002 SB:09 FROM TO 19096946477# P.0624 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 14 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL _ ~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 17 SP - SCHOOL MITIGATION (cont.) INEFFECT mitigation agreement between the Temecula Valley Unified School District and Redhawk Communities, Inc. All school sites shall meet the requirements of the requirements of the district in terms of size, location, access, and absence from environmental constraint. (Amended by Planning Commission on August 7, 2000.) 30.PLANNING. 20 SP - SKR FEE CONDITION INEFFECT The SPECIFIC PLAN is located partially within the Riverside County Ordinance No. 663 fee area boundary. Prior to the approval of any implementing land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.) which is within the Riverside County Ordinance No. 663 fee area boundary, the implementing project shall be conditioned to require that prior to the issuance of any grading permit, certificate of occupancy, or upon building permit final inspection, O whichever comes first, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Riverside County Ordinance No. 663, which generally requires he payment of the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. The amount of the fee required to be paid may vary depending upon a variety of factors, ' including type of development application submitted and the applicability of any fee reduction Or exemption provisions contained in Riverside County Ordinance No. 663. In the event Riverside County Ordinance No. 663 is rescinded, this condition will no longer be applicable. However, should Riverside County Ordinance No. 663 be rescinded and superseded by a subsequent mitigation fee ordinance, payment of he appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance shall be required. 30.PLANNING. 26 SP - CC&R RES PUB COMMON AREA INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.) containing any common areas identified in the specific plan, the following condition shall be applied to the land division or development permit if the permanent master maintenance organization referenced in the condition entitled "SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE" is a public organization. The condition shall be implemented prior to the recordation of Q any final subdivision map, or prior to the issuance of building permits in the case of development permits and shall read as follows: MRR-13-2002 16:10 FROM TO 19096946477# P.07/24 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 15 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 26 SP - CC&R RES PUB CONII~ION AREA (cont.) INEFFECT The applicant shall convey to the County fee simple title, to all common open space areas, free and cleax of all liens, taxes, assessments, leases (recorded or unrecorded) and easement, except those easements which in the sole discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to the County accepting title to such areas, the applicant shall notify the Planning Aepartment that the following documents shall be submitted to the Office of-the County Counsel and submit said documents for review along with the current fee, which shall be subject to County Counsel approval: 1. A cover letter identifying the project for which approval is sought; 2. A signed and notarized declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; O 3. A sample document, conveying title to the purchaser, of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference; and, 4. A deposit equaling three (3) hours of the current hourly fee for Review of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions established pursuant to County Ordinance No. 671 at the time the above referenced documents are submitted for County Counsel review. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, and c) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provisions shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall, if dormant, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the County's demand, title to all or any part of the 'common area', MW2-13-2002 18:10 FROM IO 1`11~`Jb`J464'f fit r. ea~z4 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 16 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - /~'CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00219A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 26 SP - CC&R RES PUB COMMON AREA (cont.) (cont.)INEFFECT more particularly described on Exhibit ' ' attached hereto. Such acceptance shall be through the president of the property owner's association, who shall be authori2ed to execute any documents required to facilitate transfer of the 'common area'. .The decision to require activation Of the property owners' association and the decision to require that the association unconditionally accept title to the 'common area' shall be at the sole discretion of the County of Riverside. in the event that the 'common area', or any part thereof, is conveyed to the property owners' association, the association, thereafter, shall own such 'common area', shall manage and continuously maintain such 'common area', and shall not sell or transfer such 'common area' or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-iri-interest. The property owners' O association shall have the right to assess the owner of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'eommon area', and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area' established pursuant to this Declaration. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved by the Office of County Counsel, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded by the Planning Department with one copy retained for the case file, and one copy provided to the County Transportation Department - Survey Division. MRR-13-2Gd92 lid: lb FKUI`7 IU 17b7b74b4'!'!A t'. YJ7/G4 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS Page: 17 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~CIFIC PLAN Case ~: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 27 SP - CC&R RES PRI COMMON AREA INEFFECT Prior to the approval of any land division or development permit (use permit, plot plan, etc.) containing any common areas identified in the specific plan, the following condition shall be applied to the land division or development permit if the permanent master maintenance organization referenced in the condition entitled "SP - COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE" is a private organization. The condition shall be applied prior to the recordation of any final map in the case of the land division, or prior to the issuance of building permits in the case of development permits and shall read as follows: The applicant shall notify the Planning Department that the following documents shall be submitted to the`Office of County Counsel and submit said documents for review along with the current fee, which shall be subject to County Counsel approval: 1. A cover letter identifying the project for which approval is sought; 2. A signed and notarized declaration o£ covenants, conditions and restrictions; 3. A sample document, conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit, which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference; and, 4. A deposit equaling three (3) hours of the current hourly fee for Review if Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions established pursuant to County Ordinance No. 671 at the time the above referenced documents are submitted for County Counsel review. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, c) provide for ownership of the common area by either the property owners' association or the owners of each individual lot or unit as tenants in common, and (d) contain the following provisions O verbatim: "Notwithstanding, any provision in this Declaration to MAR-13-2002 18 11 FROM iu 1'7l'J7b74b4'!'/R 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Y.lb/G4 Page: 18 ~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 27 SP - CC&R RES PRI COMMON AREA (cont.) the contrary, the following provisions.shall apply: The property owners' association established herein shall manage and continuously maintain the 'common area' more particularly described on Exhibit '_', attached hereto, and shall not sell or transfer the 'common area' or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. O The property owners' association shall have the right to assess the owners of each individual lot or unit for the reasonable cost, of maintaining such 'common area' and shall have the right to lien the property of any such owner who defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment lien, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Declaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior written consent of the Planning Director of the county of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if it affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area' established pursuant to this Declaration. In the event of any conflict between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." once approved by the Office of County Counsel, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded the Planning Department with one copy retained for the case file, and one copy provided to the County Transportation Department - Survey Division. 30.PLANNING. 28 SP - PARK SITE "C" Park site "C" (Planning Area 31) shall include barbeque facilities, picnic facilities, or other amendities as shown on specific plan park site exhibits. Park site ^C" shall be offered for dedication and improved prior to 75th occupancy of the dwelling units in Planning Area INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 18:11 FRUM IU 17VJ7b74b4ffH r.iii G•~ 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS /08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~ gCIFIC PLAN Case #: SPO0217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 30. PRIOR TO ANY PROJECT APPROVAL 30.PLANNING. 26 SP - PARK SITE "C" (cont.) 17. 30.PLANNING. 29 SP - PARK SITE "D" Park site "D" (Planning Area 32) shall include paseo buffer or other park and greenbelt area amenities as shown on Specific Plan park site exhibits. Park site "D" shall be fully developed prior to recordation of any final map in Master Phase III (Planning Areas 5, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, and part of 2). TRANS DEPARTMENT 30.TRANS. 1 SP - SP217A1/ASSESSMENT DIST The Rancho Villages assessment is an integral component of the planning for this area. Prior to recordation of tract maps within this specific plan or any other project located within the assessment district, the final actions necessary for formation of he district must be completed. Should the assessment district fail for any reason, the project proponent shall be responsible for all of the road improvements to Slate Route 79 as well as the on-site improvements proposed by the district. 30.TRANS. 5 SP - SP217A1/TS/TS REQUIRED Site specific traffic studies will be required for all subsequent implementing projects within the boundaries of Specific Plan No. 217, Amendment No. 1, in accordance with Traffic Study Guidelines. Subsequent traffic studies shall monitor development within the specific plan and its associated trip generation. 100. PRIOR TO ISSUE GIVEN BLDG PRMT PLANNING 100.PLANNING. 3 SP - COUNT RES BUILD PERMITS This condition is applied to assist the Planning Department with tracking the build-out of the SPECIFIC PLAN by automatically counting all the issuance of all new residential building permits on the County's Land Management System which are electronically associated with the Specific Plan. Page: 19 INEFFECT INEFPECT MET- INEFFECT INEFFECT MRR-13-2002 18:11 FROM TO 190969464'7`Iit 03/19/01 Riverside County LMS 08:52 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL r.1~~~4 Page: 20 ~CIFIC PLAN Case #: SP00217A1 Parcel: 952-230-008 100. PRIOR TO ISSUE GIVEN BLDG PRMT 100.PLANNING. 4 SF - PARK SITE "E" PARK PLANS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE 3,650th building permit within any planning area of the SPECIFIC PLAN, detailed park plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department and the County Service Area No. 143, or other entity set forth in-the Planning Department's condition entitled "SP - Common Area Maintenance" for the park site designated as Planning Area 33 (Park Site "E"). The detailed park plane shall conform with the design criteria in the specific plan document for Planning Area 33 and with the requirements of County Service Area No. 143, or other entity eet forth in the Planning Department entitled "SP - Common Area Maintenance". The park plans need not be working drawings, but shall include landscape and irrigation plans, descriptions and placement of recreational facilities and documentation evidencing a permanent maintenance mechanism for the park and its facilities. 100,PLANNING. 5 SP-PARK SITE "E" CONSTRUCTION PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE 3,750th building permit iri any planning area of the SPECIFIC PLAN, the park designated as Planning Area 33 (Park Site "E"} shall be Constructed and ~ fully operable. INEFFEC'I INEFFECT I'IHK-1J-Gl'J•7G ltl~ 1G rKUI'1 O ~ @ -- --- u .e 6' ec .~ E Ef O ~ S ~_ O N D S S a rJ as W a V W 6 N IU lyt9:ib~J4b4'/'Iii P.13/24 o ~, ~i pp~ M d ~' ° e ~r MRR-13-2W2 1812 FF2UM IU 171'Jyb79b4'/'/R Y.14i G4 a ®. VAtr tl/'~ks VAC tlM~r tl/`~Ir tlAC ~a~ TR2l20J~~1W494J2 T~R~8154°•PP10SS4 LAND USE X8.9 95 T55R2W ~ 952-23 ~; RANCHO CAl i BORN i A ~ tS1 ~ 07! N-3 ~ 0'9/11/00 °ca CN ~ 0 9Re~ AIdERSIDE COUNTY PIANNINC DEPARTHENY tlA4 ~71'i ~ tl C.7 MHR-13-2002 18 13 FROM A-9-90 TO 190%946477p SP ZONE P. 15/24 e ,4-9-90 iR29205 TR~19452 YR8879Q'//11354 PROPOSED SON I NG ~8•g 15 Tr3SR2Y~ ~ 952-23 ~, RAHCH4 CAl I~FORN I A ~ tst e' a !90 H-8 ~ __07/11/60 °" ~C ,,, ~e $~iyee () RIVEASIOE COVNTY 9LANbINO DEPAkTdEbT p ,~„a„„„ 1'WK-13-G~b~ 1d~1S hKUM IU 17b7b74b4 lYA Y. lb/G4 O MRFZ-13-2002 18 13 FRUM .~ IU 1J0Jb'j4b4'f(F Y, 1'(/24 A~ ' ..fit a I~ pp ~• ' gll I , 'Bfr;e s u B 6 ~ 8 o al 81 ~ ~ s';~li.f°ft~i Iet . It ~f~it ~fjt tal got glt ~! qt a ~ ~ pi:~a~~ ~1.,,!~ tfQ ~PEa. tl'fi~.l tf.i ~Il.! g'' t' ii. i 41i. ~ ~ ~~ii;iiff~gl:llel~~ illtl~ ~~f!ll~~lil~lutlai:l~~g-I~~I~t~ ~g~i~~.i ~$ Q a ~ ~~ta~ ~ ~ ~II,,t • I,' ~ ~ ,,t~ gw . I,~I~ttf ;~ g;~lg. (~ LLL dtla ~~~• ffI Ifl~ 11~~Et li;~ 5 t' 0 anew -~~a~ . Q rwz-l3-~ez 16~ la rrzurl 1 . ~~~ 8;~a . ~ U 4 O e"'~ ~ A p iL N~~ a~S ~ ~~~ . ,~•+1 ~ a a i~ 1 U 17VT7b7Qb4'! /A _ _ ~J , ~~~~,~,"~ ~~~' a: il'' ~G~~ i':~ii ~kd ~~~ti II~ o~ f. ,y~ Qil. 1:.1 ~J•l , ... 1 I-:. }Tt v rf 7 .+•. r pr ~ ::1i~ ~ a o .i ~ r,, .~~ y I =; 'f + I 333 ~ 6 . '•ia+ I gli ~ •~ ~ ~ t 1 il ,~ ~ •~ 1 • 1 .~i r. loi ev ......h O O 0 MRR-13-2002 16 15 FROM TO 19096946477p P.19i24 11 ~' ~11 ~' ;~ ~ 1) 1 iii 1 ~L; ~~ 1, ~I ~1 M .__- t ~ e ~A G ~ MRR-13-2002 18.15 FROM TO 19096946477# P.20/24 •. ,~ r_ • ~ ~~.:~ O _ ,~,I L~ ,~ w~~,~ :w ~~ I ~`J I --- _~--- ; , ' :ii i::4'.. ....'" ;::' rp~t1YLS:J~I:: SYS' • ..I~a>. ._. 9 .] 1 ~ d ~ 2 ~N.~II ~ y}, P \~. ...~ ...~ 1 ~ ~ tt ' • IR.^. •... ...... ' ' • ~ I ;jam P :1 J .~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ QI ~ pd~~ ~' +~ C V 11 a' ... ........... qi~__.. Jyl _ s ~ ~ ___ 6 [Y __ _ ~'I~ OS1O rr- - I J~ ' Q Q R ~~~ .. _._$._`- .r. ~_.. LL LL K .N Y1 N V. a' ~~ pp PPS ~.~ _ ni Q ~•~ s~~s ' <=_s ~ '<C .s<~ • _ ~ ~ , " _ , H ~ppI 4<Y ~ F$I zd• t fi7d i ~ ~` ~~ 0. ~` MFlR-13-2002 16 15 FROM •i O 0 .~ .~ ~ 'csa '`1 a ~ TO 1909694647'7 ~~ o, . !° -~. 0 ~. ® `~ Q a N.21i24 ~' I j 1 ~l0~ ~ ~lu,~ o M+~I . i~ ~~~ s ~° a ~ 'I Ft Uri q/ V_ C''~ ~~ ~~ .• o " ',~ _ ~ `~~ MAR-13-2002 18 15 FROM TO 19096946477# P. x/24 !1 ~~ ~r„~- ~~~;I ~~~,. -I ,, . ;! 'HHHH I y w«~ v! ~Fg~'~ asl~~d J ~ A J ~ ; bum ~~~,r I<Idzmai o n~ 1^~ U ~~ ~~ g S sQa 6Z a~ P F~l O wg r*~ Us W ~ Pd. ' l m I'IHK-I3-GVJbG liS~lb YKUI'I i ~ _ ., o ~~ r 1p~~ q, 1 f ~i~'f ,iJl~l ~I II li n 1 d It Y.L ~ ~ f '- 1 _,? \ ` ~NWY e ~ ~° Q.~l~i g o s ~~ U~ ~jla d IU 1JU'JOJVOVffM r.GJ~GY MRR-13-2002 18 16 FROM w,. ~ .. o :~ '~ To 1~69a6a•rra r.~aiza ~ !~ N ~~ o x' a~ _d J Vg ~/~ w Fes' 4 a