HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolutions & OrdinancesORDIPIARICE N0.05-14
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TERflECULA AAAENDING PLANNING AREAS 7 AND 9 OF THE
IIAARGARITA bILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN TO CHANGE THE
SPECIFIC PLAN PERAAITTED USES HUITHIN PLANNING AREA
7 FROAA USES ALLOWED IN THE L-9 (1-ACRE LOTS) ZONING
DESIGNATION TO LRA (7,200 SQUARE FOOT LOTS) ZONING
DESIGNATION OF THE CITY'S DEVELOPflAENT CODE ANO
FROflA THE L-1 (1•ACRE LOTS) DESIGNATION TO THE L-2
(20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS) DESIGNATION FOR PLANNING
AREA 9A (PA04-0380).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that:
A. Vinyards View Estates, LLC, filed Planning Application Nos. PA04-0390, Specific
Plan Amendment, and PA04-0392, Tentative Tract Map (No. 23103-2) for the property
consisting of approximately 18.32 acres generally located at the northwest comer of Butte~eld
Stage Road and Chemin Clinet, known as Assessors Parcel No(s). 950-390-007 and 953-050-
009 ("Project");
,~ B. The applications for the Project were processed and an environmental review
11L,~Jr) was conducted as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act.
C. The Planning Commission of the Ciry of Temecula held a duly noticed public
hearing on June 1, 2005 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental review,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to this matter;
D. Following consideration of the entire record of ihformation received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 05-40, recommending approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan for the Project and Resolution No. 05-42, recommending the City
Council approval of a Tentative Tract Map;
E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 051, recommending approval of a Specific Plan Amendment;
F. On July 26, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the
opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters.
4}
R10MS T005/Ords DS74
G. On July 26, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Mitigated
Negative. Declaration and a Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Project when it adopted
Resolution No. 05-82; and Tentative Tract Map with Resolution No. 05-83;
H. On July 26, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved a Specific
Plan Amendment for the Project when it approved Ordinance No. OS-14.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of
Margarita ~Ilage Spec Plan as included in Exhibit aA~.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any sentence, Gause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable and ii for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City
9"' day of August, 2005.
ATTEST:
w'
Jones, CMC
0
of the City of Temecula this
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
0
0
O
RJOrds 2005/Ords 05.14
i;
L
e
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 05-14 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
meeting of the City Council on the 26"' day of July, 2005 and that thereafter, said Ordinance
was duly adopted and passed at a meeting of the City Council on the 9"' day of August, 2005,
by the following vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: Edwards, Naggar, Washington, Comerchero
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
R:/OM8 2005/OWS 0674
1 ~
ORDINANCE NO. 05-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
T@MECULA AMENDING THE TEXT NUITHIN THE MARGARITA
VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-3) ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
PLANNING AREA 4B, TO ALLODU "NO MINIMUM" 6UILDING
SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY LINES
HUITHIN PLANNING AREA 48 AS LONG AS T6fE ADJACENT
PROPERTY IS USEO SOLELY FOR RECREATIOAI OPEN SPACE
OR PARKING PURPOSES (PLANNING APPLICATION 04.0486)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 7. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and
declare that: '
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan and the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3); and
B. M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC, tiled Planning Application No. PA04-0486,
Specifrc Plan Amendment in accordance with the Cltyof Temecula General Plan and Development
Code; and
C. The application for the Project was processed as required by law, including the
California Environmental Quality Act; and
D. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing
on December 15, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental determination,
at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in
support or opposition to this matter; and
E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public
hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 2004-070, recommending approval of the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3)
Amendment No. 6; and
F. The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 11, 2005 to
consider the proposed Specific Pian Amendment; and
G. On January 1l, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on the Project atwhich time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity
and did address the City Council on these matters; and
Section 2. Findinos. The City Council, in approving Planning Application No. PA04-
0486hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.16.020.E of the City
of Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Pfan and
n Development Code,
~/
RJOrds 200610rds 06-02
~_ .,~`
~,
B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city.
C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use deslgnaGons
and the anticipated land use developments.
D. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable characterwhich
will be compatible with existing and proposed development In the surrounding neighborhood.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from CEQA review
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3). The proposed project is an existing golf course
with a clubhouse and recreation amenities surrounded by detached single family residential
property. The proposed project and surrounding area is currently built out with no future plans for
expansion. The M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC and the Temeku Hills Homeowners
Association (HOA) have worked out an agreement that involves subdividing Lot 25 (the Temeku
Hills Clubhouse and Recreation Facilities) into two parcels. The first parcel (clubhouse and parking
facilities) will be jointly owned by the new owner of the golf course and the HOA. The second parcel
(swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot) will be deeded to the HOA. In order to allow for the
transfer of ownership to the HOA, the building setbacks need to be revised to allow a •no minimum"
building setback requirement from adjoining properly lines within Planning Area 46, as long as the
adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes. The proposed
project is a minor revision to the Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance allowing the clubhouse and
recreation facility property to be transferred to the Homeowner's Association. There is no possibility
that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore it is not
subject to CEQA.
Section 4. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and
posted in the manner required bylaw.
PASSED, APPROVED, APID ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
25"' day of January, 2005. ~.----~ ,.
Jeff Comerchero,
ATTEST:
RJOrds zooeioros os-o2
O RESOLUTIOPI 1V0.98-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE C1TY COUNCII.OF THE C1TX OF
TEA4ECULA APREENDHVG SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199,
CONTAIIV~IG 1,526 ACRES GENERALLX LOCATED
SOUTH OF I.A SERENA WAX, EAST OF ligARGARITA
ROAD, VEST OF A3EADOWS PARICWAI', AND NORTH[ OF
RANCIBO CALIIrORNIA ROAD (PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA97-0438 - AAIEAIDAIEPIT N0.4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN
NO. 199)
WHEREAS, the City of Temeaila fled Planning Application No. PA97-0438 in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
®VHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita Village) proposes to
remove lot coverage requirements unintentionally included in the Residential Development Standards
Matrix and text;
B5'H(EREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0438 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. YA97-0438 on
January 5, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested
O persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
96'H[EREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments,
if arty, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relafmg to Planning
Application No. PA97-0438 and rewmmended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to
Specific Play No. 199;
~ the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27,1998 to
consider Planning Application No. PA97-0438, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0438;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CfPY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECIJLA
DOES HEHLEBX RESOLVE AND DETERA~IIPTE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 The City Council hereby approves
Amendment No 4 to Specific Plan No. 199, removing all references to maximum lot coverages.
Section 2. .The City Council, based upon the information contained
a~.va-ro
O
in Environmental Fm rt No. 202, prepared for S ~ ~
pact Repo pacific Plan No. 199 and certified by the
Riverside Courty Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on
August 20, 1997 which determined that the project is consistent with the information wntained in
the previously cdtified EIR, finds that due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the
speafic plan, there wlll be nfl effect beyomd that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under
California Public Revourcea Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless additional impacts not
previously oon4iderad, or sarbstarltial inaeases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial
changes in the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which would requ'1re a major
revision in the EiR, or new information that could not have been known at the time the E1R was
prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further
environmental analysis is required.
S¢ctlon 3. Ceverebility. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for arty reason a wort of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolution to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section b. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSIM, APPRO~D, Al-1~ AII~PT)i2), by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 27 th day of January, 1998.
o,
Ron Roberts, Agayor
A_TfEST:
S' W Jones, IC
g City Clerk
~S~)
aemo.98.10 2 Q
~t O
STATE OF CALIFORAIIA )
COUAITY OF RIdERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEI~CULA )
I, Susan W. Jobs,. Acxing City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution Alo. 98-10 was duly and regularly adapted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regulaz meeting thereof held on the 27 ffi day of 7anuazy, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES: 4 COUN~.~~ERS: Comerhcero, Ford, I.indemans, Roberts
AiOES: 0 COUATCIr.7uFi1~sRFRS; Alone
ABSENT: 1 COUNCII.AgEMBERS: Stone
.-on..~ a-~.Q
Susan .Jones, C
' City Clerk
Raroa.98-10 9
0
RESOLUTION NO.98-10
A RESOLUT%ON OF THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE Cll7CY OF
TEIldECULA AIbIENDING SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199,
COPITAIIVING 1,526 ACRES diEP1ERALLX LOCATED. ,
SOlDTH OF I.A SERENA WAX, EAST OF AdARGARITA
ROAD, WEST OFAlEADOWS PARIKWAl', AND NORTH OF
RANQO CAY.YFORPIIA ROAD (PLAPIIVEIVG APPLIICATION
NO. PA97-0438 - AAZENDA3ENT NO. 4 TO SPECIFIC PLAN
810.199)
WHEREAS, the City of Temeaila fled Plaraung Application No. PA97-0438 in accordance
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 (Margarita V'dlage) proposes to
ranove lot coverage requirements unintentionally included in the Residential Development Standards
Matrix and text;
WHEEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0438 was proce§sed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
®VHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0438 on
iO January 5, 1998, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by ]aw, at which time interested
persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments,
if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating to Planning
Application No. PA97-0438 and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to
Specific Plan No. 199;
WHEREAS, the City Council.has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27,1998 to
consider Planning Application No. PA97-0438, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition;
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0438;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY' RESOLVE AND DETERi>~PTE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No. 199 The City Council hereby approves
Amendment No 4 to Specific Plan No. 199, removing all references to maximum -ot coverages.
Section Z. Environmental Review. The City Council, based upon the information contained
O n~..va-to
__ in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, Prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and certified by the O
Riverside County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment prepared on
August 20, 1997 which detemvned that the project is consistei-f with the information contained in
the previously certified E11; 5nds that due to the' limited scope of the"proposed changes to the
speca5c plan, there wdl be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analyses. Under
California°1'irblioRe.Sancea Code Section 21166 snd Section 15162 of the California Envuorunental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; no additional EIIt is required unless additional impacts not
previouuty considered, or substantial ina~eases in the severity of impacts, may result from: substantial
changes in-the circumstances under which the project is-undertaken which would require a major
revision in the E1R, or new information that could not have been known at the time the EIR was
prepared becomes available. None of these situations has occurred; therefore, no further
. environmental analysis is required..
Section. 3. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Resolution are severable and if for air reason a court`of wmpetent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Resolutionto=be'im+alid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Resolution.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption ofthis Resolution.
]PASSEHD, APERO\7ED, APIID AEOFTlED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 27 th day of January, 1998
Ron Roberts, Mayor
P_TfEST:
4.~n ~ d-xao
S•~s W Jones, ZC
g City Clerk
(S~)
a~sa-ro z O
O
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUA]TY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Janes, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 98-10 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regulaz meeting thereof held on the 27 th day of January, 1998, by the following
vote:
AYES: 4 COUAICILMEMBERS: Comerhcero, Ford, Lindemann, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUATCII.MIIVIBERS: None
ABSENT: 1 COIINCII.AgIIVIBERS: Stone
e-*~-o
Susan .Jones, RC
' City Clerk
O
O Reoaa.9&30 3
0
ORDINANCE N0.98-03
AN ORD%NANCIE OF THE C1d'I' COYJNCI%. OF'fl~ CI~X
O1F 1'E11~CQJLA AMEAIIDING SPECIFIC ll'Y.AN NO. 199,
REltflOVIlVG LOT' COVEII~GE FROM .T1E~ MATRl~ AND
mod' OF SPECi(FTC<PLAN NO: 149 ZONING'S2'AAIIDARDS
C®NTAYNHIVG fl,526 ACRES' ~ENERAI:%Y LOCAT'F.D
SOI7TH OF II.A SERENA WAY, IEASi' OF M[ARGARY'1'A
ROAD, WEST OF MEADOWS PARRS'b'AY, AAIID NORZ~ OF
RANCHO CALYFURN%A ROAD, (P1.AN1d1NG
APPLICAI'IO1V NO. PA47-0438 - AAIEPIDMEAIT NO. 4 TO
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides ,for the adoption and
administruion of caning laws; ordinances,-rules and regulations by` cities to implement such
general plans as may be in effect in any such city; and
WHEREREAS, Sections 65860 of the Governmertt Code requires that a wrung ordinance
shall be consistent with the adopted General Plan of the city; and
WHEREAS, there"is a geed to amend' Specific Plan No. 199 to accurately reflect private
O property artd to be consistent with the ,adopted General Plan; and
W~REAS, the Planning Comrnission held a duly noticed public hearing on January 5,
1998, and recommended that the City Council approve Amendment No. 4 to Specific Plan No.
:.199; and"'
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law
and local ordinances; and,
WHEfltF.AS, t~tice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
W~REEAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 27, 1998
to consider the proposed arra'ndment to Specific Plan No. 199
1'HE CH'1'H COUNCII, OF'dHE CdTl' OF 1T~(.'Ufl.A, SPATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY ORDA%AI AS FOLLOWS:
Section fl. AMENDMENT TO SPECIFI PAN NO. ]~ The City Council hereby
amends Specific Plan No. 199 removing lot coverage from the matrix and text within the
document eatitled, "Margarita Village SP Zone Standards."
O o~~vam
S~41on 2• .The City Council, bared upon the information
contained in Environmental Impact Report No. 202, prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and
certified by the Riverside.County Board of Supervisors, and an Initial Environmental Assessment
prepared on August 20, 1997 which detern»ned tharthe project is consistent with the information
contained:in,the previously certified IIR, finds that due to the limited-scope of the proposed
changes w the specific., plan; there will be no effect beyond that which was reviewed in the
previous analyses: UnderCalifomia Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162 of
the California Environmental Quality Act. (CEQA) Guidelines,, no additional IIR is required
unless additional impacts not previously considered, or.substantial increases in the verity of
impacts, may insult from: substantial changes in the circugtstances under which the project is
undertaken evhich would require a major revision in the IIR, or new information that could not
have been known at the time the IIR was prepared becomes available.. Nome of these situations
has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Sfdion 3. ~~$~'~,. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason,a court of,competent jurisdiction shall hold arty
sertterxe, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
S~loa 4. NOTICE OF A PTION. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this
. Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted. as requited bylaw.
Sectio® 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after iu
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the: full text of this Ordinance shall
be possad in the office of the City Cleric at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Cotuxilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and Bost the same in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTID, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 10 th• day of February, 1998.
ATTEST:
c.~,a
Su ~1 Jones, C
A g ^-u5 qtr
[SEAT.]
Ron Roberts, Mayor
O
oa~t~am 2 O
0
STATE OF CALIFOI2AIIA )
COUNTY OF RIdERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TE1I~CULA )
I, Susaa W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Ordinance No.98-03 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 10 th day of February, 1998, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COIJNCILAgElVIDERS: Comerchero, Ford, I.indemans, Stone, Roberts
NOES: 0 COUNCII.>v9IIVIBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBEI2S: None
ate..., n--r~-~-~
S W Jones, CMC
A g City Clerk
O
O aao~s~o
- ORDINANCE 810.97-19
AN ORDINANCE OF ~ CITY COYINCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEt1~LR1LA, CALII~IDRNYA, ASR®YIING G
APPLICAT'%ON IVO. PA99-0lts9 AP/,[~NIDIlVG T~ TF.~T
WITHIAI SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO REDUCE THE
DWELLIIdG UNITS .FROA4[..4,~97 TO 3,922, UNI7I'S, TO
ELIlIHNATE THE COIV~IERCIAL .ACREAGE AT THE
1V®RTHVUFST CORIVE~ .O)F RA1VC~0 CALIIF~IDRRIIA ROAID
APID A~IlEA12iDWS . . PA1~AY, . TO ~D AN
APPROK~AT~YY 12.5 ACRE; PARK AT THIE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF.LA SID[tFd~lA,ARIFD Ai~ADOWS PAR]tCWAY,
RAID 3'O REB'&SE LeOADW~i' CROSS-SF.C'I'IOR1S, %DFSIGPI
GUIDELYNFS, AND DE~IEIdD r~q' STANDARDS, ALL
WITHIN i~H.LAGE °A°
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Ci'i'i' OF T'ULA, STATE OF CALY~DRNIA,
GOES ORDAIPI AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before,the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula,. State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning laws
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use
O district is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of
Temecula as adopted by fhe City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City
Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by
placing in affect the cane or canes as described in the above title.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
posted is at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Rnvimnmencai c'om;1;~~. Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was
prepazed for Specific Plan No. 199 -and was certified by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors. in conjunction with Amendment No. 2 to dte Specific Plan, a number of additional
studies were undertaken to update and complement the original EIIL. The additional studies, a
geotechnical study, traffic study and a Kangaroo Rat trapping and update study, confirmed the
validity of the original analysis.
It has been eleven (11) years since the original environmental analysis was
performed for this project. Therefore, Staff prepared another Initial Environmental Assessment
to examine the question of whether any impacts beyond those analyzed in the previous EIR and
_ subsequent studies would result from the proposed project, changes in circumstances, or new
information. In areas where there was a potential change in circumstances, specifically traffic,
O Ordd97d9 ~
O
noise, and lighting, staff requested additional information from the applicant. Based upon Staffs
analysis, the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR.
Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect
beyond that which was reviewed in the pnwious analysis.
Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional Eat is required
unless additional impacts not previously "considered, or substantial increases in the severity of
impacts, may result from:' substantial changes in the. circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new informaoion that could not
have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations
has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. ];jQtjipgg
A. Planning Application No. PA97-0160 (Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No. 199) as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
B. Planning Application IVo. PA97-0160 (Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No:' 199) is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General PLtn. O
C. The project is compatible with suuroutding ]arid uses. The project proposes ~'
a reduction in the density and intensity of land uses. Ultimate development will be residential
development in an area that is comprised of a variety of residential neighborhoods.
D. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the site and is
consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 194.
E. The amendment to Specific Plan No. 149 does not incrrage the impacts
associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in
Environmental Impact Report No. 202.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Catncilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
O~do~97-19
O
0
- PASSID, APFROV~, AMID AIItD1FTFD, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October, 1997.
~~~~
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
~~
June`S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
O
I, ]une S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby Y that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-19 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading ai a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 7th day of October, 1997, and that thereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adapted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 28th day of October, 1997 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5 COUNC]LMEMBERS Ford, Lindemann, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILA~IvIBERS None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCn.1~~ERS None
~~•
June S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
ONs197-19
0
RESmILY1Td®N 1V®. 7f-%18
A RESOLY7Tl[ON OF THE CiTH COUPICYi. OIE THE C1TY
OlF TEIVYEC[JY,A APPRO~IIlYG PZ.ANRlIlYG APPLICATYOIV
ND. PA97-OflBl T® CHAIVGIE ~'HE GEN1HiAIL P1LAly
DPSYGNATIIONS ]FR®Ah[ %dDW 1l~DEQJ1iQ )<DIgFTSI1'Ti'
RIESIDE[dlffAfl. (3$ DWEH.$,YN(', IAVITS PER ACRE
li~lAle1i11gLJ1~ TC Y.DW DENSIITY RIESYDERI'Il7AY. (0.3-2
D9e/E1L%.flNG YJ1VI7'S PER ACRE AdA W%7[~IIV
PLAP11VHlVG AREA 2; ]FR®Ad NEIGHI6®RlffiDOID
C®IVIlV~C1Al[. TO A~D%DA4 D7E1~15TlCYf RIi~E[dTIIA% (7-fl2
DWELLING UlYITS PER ACRE lilies WflTHIN
PLANNING AREA 3>;; AND F7R®A4[ A~%LTA~% IlDEiVSYT$
RIFSIDENTIAL (7-12 ID9~VELF ING 4JNgTS PE¢C ACRE
liiARIA3ilA~ ~ I.mW 1VVYEDDIYJAd DENSI~ ]ll&SIIDENTYAL
(3-6 DWELLING UNfl15 PELF ACRE.AIA~YUAQ) WITHIPT
PLANNING AREA 4Q; ALL WITHII~I SPECHIFIC PLAN P70.
1S9 (A3ARGARIlI'A ~'H.LAG]E~.
WHERP.AS, Temeku FTills Development Partners, L.P. filed Planning Application No.
O PA97-0161 in accordance with the City of Temecula. Gecterdl plan and Development Code;
WHEH~AS, Planning Application No. PA97-0161. was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State and local law;
WHE1tEAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0161
on September 8,.1997, at a duly noticed public hearing. as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition;
WHE[tEAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended
approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0161;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA97-0161 on t?cto6er 7, 1997, at which time interested persons had opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition w Planning Application No. PA97-0161;
W1r~F1iF-AS, the City Council rECeived a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0161;
O Recoe197.111
- A109U, TARE, THE C1TX COUIdCI(B. OF ~~ CIlTx OF ~ >,~~
R,FSOLdE, DETJERIIlIlV1E AlV1D ORHDIi~ AS 1[YD1LIIdDVd'S:
Setklon 1. ):ind1ng8.
A. The City Council in approving the proposed General Plan Amendment, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. Planning Application ATo. PA97-0161 (General Plan Amendment) as
proposed is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
2. The project is compatible with- surrounding Lmd uses. Ultimate
development of the site will be residential development in an area that is comprised of a variety
of residential neighborhoods.
3. The proposed project will not have an adverse effect on the community
because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan.
Section 2. F.nvimnmen 1 -omn ian Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was
prepared for Specific Plan IVo. 199 and was certified by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on August 26, 1986. in conjunction with Amendment ATo. 2 to the Specific Plan, a O
number of additional studies were undertaken to update and complement the original EIR. The
additional studies, a geotechnicai study, traffic study and a Kangaroo Rat trapping and update >
. study, confirmed the validity of the original analysis.
It has been eleven (1l) years since the original environmental analysis was performed for
'this project. Therefore, Staff pnpazed another Initial Environmental Assessment to examine the
question of whether any impacts, beyond those analyzed in the previous EIR and subsequent
studies, would result from the proposed project, changes in circumstances, or from aew
information. In areas where there was a patential change in circumstances, specifically traffic,
noise, and lighting, staff requested additional information from the applicant. Based upon Staff s
analysis, the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR.
Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect
beyond. that which was reviewed in the previous analysis.
Under California Public Resources Code Secxion 21166 and Section 15162 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required unless
additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of impacts,
may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the projecf is undertaken
which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not have been
known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations has
- occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Aesoo\97-lll
0
--- Section 3. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning
Application No. PA97-0161 to change the General Plan rations on parcels totaling 82.4 acres
of land from Low Medium to Low Density Residenfial within Planning Area 2, from
Neighborhood Commercial to Medium Density Resideatial within Planning Area 3fi, and from
Medium to Low Medium Ben4ty, Residential within Planning":Are 40, all within Specific Plan No.
199 (Margarita; Village).
~,
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.-
PASSE, APPROVI® APTID ADLD]F117® by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 7th day of Qctober, 1997..
ATTEST:
. Greek, CMC/AAE
O- City Clerk
[SEAL]
1~ ~~
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
O ~~~-iii
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss .
C1TY.OF TEMECULA.. ) -
I;.7une S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temectla do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97-111 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of October, 1997, by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
S COUNCILMEMBERS: Pond, Lindemans, Roberts; Stone, Birdsall
0 COUNCII.MEMBERS: Nate
0 COUNCILI~4EARBERS: None
Iona S. Gteek, CMGAAE
City Clerk
Remo\97-111 q
0
O
O
O _ RESOLYJTION NO. 97-112
A RESOLY)TION OF TAE CITY COUNCIY. OF TAiE CITY
OF TEli3EC[lLA APPROVING PLANNING APPI.ICATYON
IVO. PA97-01~9 AA~%ERIIDA~A]a' NO. 3 TO SPF.CSIFIC PLART
NO.149,.. RF.OY7CIPIG TALE DWEQ~.IlVG'UN17fS FRORd @,049
TO 3,422 iJPIITS, EII„H1V~VAT7NG TAE COll;fl1,~RCYAL
ACREAGE AT TAIE NORTAWFST CORNER ®F RANCAm
CAI:~It®AD Al~i~ws ~A~w~~, A~~>NG
AN APPRO~ATELY 12,s ACL~]E : PAIXPA AT TAlE
s®~TAWF.sT CORNER mF LA SERENA AND I~ADtaWs
PAR>~AY, Alm G I3®A~ea~A~r . C~®ss-
SECTIONS, DESIGN Gil%IDELIIVFS AND DEVEI.~Pli~EiV'1'
STANDARDS, ALL WTTHIPI VII.I.AGE °A° .
WI~Ii1F:AS, Temeku Hills Development partners, L. P. filed Planning Application No.
PA97-0160 in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WAF.RF.AS, Planning Application No. PA97-0160 was processed in the time and manner
prescribed by State andlocal law;
WAERF.AS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0160
O on September 8, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time
interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support. or opposition;
WAEHt1EAS, az the conclusion of~the Commissoon hearing, the Commission recommended
approval of Planning Application No. PA97-0160;
WAEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Applicafion No. PA97-0160 on October 7, 1497, az which time interested persons had opportunity
to testify either in support or opposition to Planning Application No. PA97-0160;
WAEItF.AS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0160;
NOW, T1~EFORE, TAE CITY COUNCIL OF TAE CITY OF TEMECULA HItDES
RESOLVE, DETERA~NE AND.ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. F~jpgs,
The City Council in approving the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, makes the
__. following findings, to wit:
O a~rvrau
-- A. Planning Application No. PA97-0160 (Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No. 199) as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community:
B. Planning Application No. PA97-0160{Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No. 199) is consistent with the goals and golicres of the City's adopted General Plan.
C. The project is companible with surrounding laird uses. The project proposes
a reduction in the density and intensity of land uses. Ultimate development will be residential
development in an area that is comprised of a variety of residential neighborhoods.
D. The proposal will not leave an adverse • effect on surrounding property
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the site and is
consistent with the overall concept of SgecificPlan No.-199.
E. The amendment to•Specific Plan No. 199 does not increase the impacts
associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in
Environmental Impact Report No. 202.
As conditioned pursuant to Section 3, Planning Application No. PA97-0160
_ as proposed, is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community.
Section 2. Rnvimnmen at .omnlia~, Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was
prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors. In conjunction with Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan, a number of additional
studies were underralren to update and complement the original EIR. The additional studies, a
geotechnical study, traffic study and a Kangaroo Rat Napping and update study, confirmed the
validity of the original analysis.
It has been eleven (11) years since the original environmental analysis was
performed for this pn~ject. Therefore, Staff prepared another Initial Environmental Assessment
to examine the question of whether any impacts beyond those analyzed. in the previous EIR and
subsequent studies would result from the proposed project, changes in circumstances, or new
information. Tn areas where there was a potcetial change in circumstances, specifically traffic,
noi~, and lighting, staff requested additional information from the applicant. Based upon Staff s
analysis, the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR.
Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect
beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analysis.
Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required
_ unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of
impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is
x~~dn-rrz z O
0
-- undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not
have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes. available. Alone of these situations
has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is requited.
Section 3. ~nditinns: That the City of Temeraila City Council hereby approves Planning
Application ATo. PA47-0160 Specific Plan Amendment ATo. 3 to Specific PLm Aio. 199 generally
located south of Ta Serena Way, east of Margarita Raad, west of Meadows Parkway, north of
Rancho California Road, within the Margarita Village Specific Plan,subject to Exhibit A,
attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof.
Section 4, The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSER, APPROVED AAiID A)ZiD&TED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 7th day ofl?ctober, 1997.
ATTEST:
O --- - /.
June reek, C,MC~/AAj E
City Clerk
[SEAL]
~~ ~
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
O x<~rorau
~'~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) '
COtIIVTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss`.
CITY OF TBMEGULA )
I, Iune S. Greek, City.Clerk of the City of Temecula;"do hereby certify that the foregoing
"Resolution No. 97-112 was'duly and reguLuly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 7th day of October, 1997, by the following
vote, to wit: -
AYES: 5 COUNCILAgEAgBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
NOES: 0 COiIATCII.I4IEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCII.MEMBERS: None
June S. Greek, CAT~AE
City Clerk
Rceoe/97-112 q
_~
O
r