HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-3 2005 Margarita Village Specific Plan Amendment 7k
~I~
~1~~~~~ra~~
~a ~~~~~
Amendment No. 7
of
Il~argarita Village Specific Plan Rlo. 3
.f
I
O
it
.~
;}
;~
;~
Lead Agency.•
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
951.694.6400
Contact: Debbie 1Jbnoske, Director of Planning
Prepared by:
Matthew Fagan Consulting Services
42011 Avenida Vista Ladera
Temecula, CA 92591
951.699.2338
Contact: Matthew Fagan
pity of ~'emecula
April, 2®®5
i
Margarita Village fable of contents
TITLE PAGE
I. SUMMARY OF CHANGES ............................................ ..... I-1
A. SPECIFIC PLAN ....................................................... ..... I-I
1. Design Guidelines ................................................ ..... I-1
2. Additional Property ............................................... ..... I-1
3. Land Use Changes ............................................... ..... I-1
a. .Post Office ............................................... ..... I-1
b. Village..A ................................................. ..... I-2
c. Village "B» ............................................... ..... I-2
d. Village.~C ................................................. ..... I-2
e. Circulation ............................................... ..... I-3
f Pazks/School .............................................. ..... I-3
B. SUMMARY OF ENVIItONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATIONS . ..... I-4
II. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN ...................................... ... II-1
A. INTRODUCTION ......................................:................... II-1
1. ProjectLocation/Description ................................. .......... II-1
a. Site Location/Vicinity Map .................:.......... .......... II-1
b. Market Profile ....................................... .......... II-4
2. Focused EIR Format and Processing Guidelines .................. .......... II-6
B. SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM .................... .......... II-8
1. Project Location/Description ................................. .......... II-8
a. Site Location/Vicinity Map ....... . . . .................. .......... II-8
1) Rancho California and Rancho Villages Relationship . .......... II-8
` 2) Land Use Overview ............................ .......... II-9
3) Village and Neighborhood Plan .........:......... .......... II-9
b. Residential Component ...........................:... ......... II-14
1) Maximum Units ..........................:.... ......... II-]5
2) Housing Program ...........................:.. ......... II-15
3) Entry and Roadway Hierazchy .................... ......... II-17
4) Implementing Zoning ........................... ......... II-17
5) Maintenance Districts and Associations ............ ......... II-17
c. Commercial Component ............................... ......... II-20
d. Open Space Component ............................... ......... II-20
1) Open Space Slopes and Drainage ................. ......... II-20
2) Golf Course and Clubhouse ...................... ......... II-20
3) Golf Course Lakes ............................. ......... II-22
4) Neighborhood Parks ............................ ......... II-22
Specific Plan No. ]99: Amendment No. 3 Page i
Margarita Village fable of contents
5) Private Recreation Facilities/Common Open Space ............ II-22
6) Community Recreation Facilities .......................... II-22 _
7) Regional Facilities ...................................... II-23
e. Major Circulation Road and Public Facilities System ................. II-23
1) Circulation Plan ........................................, II-23
2) Public Facilities ........................................ II-29
3) Phasing Component .............._............:......... .II-33
2. Project-Wide Design and Textual Development StandazdsBxhibit(s) .......... II-33
a. Land Use Plan Standazds .....................:................. II-33
b. Open Space and Recreational Standazds ........................... II-40
c. Circulation Standazds .......................... . ............... II-40
d. Phasing Standazds ............................................. II-42
1) PhaseI ......................:......................... II-43
2) Phase II ............................................... II-44
3) Phase III .............................................. II~4
4) Phase N .............................................. II-45
e. Conceptual Grading Plan ..................:..................... II-46
f. Conceptual Drainage Plan ...................................... II-47
C. PLANNING AREA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ............................. II-50
1. Planning Area 1 ..................................................... II-51
2. Planning Area 2 ..................................:.................. II-53
3. Planning Area 3 ..................................................... II-54
4. Planning Area 4 ..................................................... II-55
5.
Planning Area 5 ......................................................
II-57 j
6. Planning Area 6 ............................:........................ II-58
7. Planning Area 7 ........:............................................ II-59
8. Planning Area 8 .......................................:............. II-61
9. Planning Area 9 ..................................................... II-62
10. Planning Area 10/11/12 .......................:...................... II-64
11. Planning Area 13 ....................................:............... II-65
12. Planning Area 14 .................................................... II-67
13. Planning Area 15 .................................................... II-69
14. Planning Area 16 .................................................... II-71
15. Planning Area 17 .................................................... II-72
16. Planning Area 18 .................................................... II-74
17. Planning Area 19 .................................................... II-75
18. Planning Area 20 .................................................... II-77
19. Planning Area 21 .................................................... II-78
20. Planning Area 22 .................................................... II-79
21. Planning Area 23 .................................................... II-8]
22.. Planning Area 24 .................................................... II-82
23. Planning Area 25 .................................................... II-84
24. Planning Area 26 ........................•-----...................... II-85
25.
26. Planning Area 27 ....................................................
Planning Area 28 .................................................... II-88
II-89
27. Planning Area 29 .................................................... II-90 ~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page ii
Margarita Village fable of contents
28. Planning Area 30 ........................ ............................ II-92
29. Planning Area 31 ........................ ...............:............ II-94 ,
30. Planning Area 32 ........................ ............................ II-96
31. Planning Area 32A ...................... ............................ II-97
32. Planning Area 33 ........................ ............................ II-98
33. Planning Area 34 ........................ ........................... II-100
34. Planning Area 35 ........................ ........................... II-101
35. Planning Area 36 ........................ ....:...................... II-102
36. Planning Area 37 ........................ ........................... II-103
37. Planning Area 38 ...................:.... ........................... II-105
38. Planning Area 39 ........................ ........................... II-106
39. Planning Area 40 ........................ ........................... II-107
40. Planning Area 41 ........................ .......... .................. II-118
41. Planning Area 42 ........................ ........................... II-110
42. Planning Area 43 ........................ ........................... II-111
43. Planning Area 44 ........................ ........................... II-112
44. Planning Area 45 ............:........... ........................... II-113
45. Planning Area 46 ........................ ...............:........... II-114
III. DESIGN GUIDELINES ....................... .............................III-1
A. PURPOSE AND INTENT ..................:... ............................. III-1
O B. THE "VILLAGES" CONCEPT ............................................... III-1
1. Village..A .................................................. .........III-2
2. Village `B> . .........................:....................... ......... III-2
3. Village ..C> . ........................:...................:... ......... III-2
C. ARCHTI'ECTURAL GUIDELINES ......::........................... .........III-4
1. Community-Wide Architectural Guidelines ....................... ......... III-4
a. Residential Criteria: Single-Family/Detached Dwellings ...... .........III-4
b. Residential Criteria: Multi-Family/Attached Dwellings ....... ......... III-5
c. RetaiUCommercial Structures and Public Buildings .......... ......... III-5
2. Village "A" Architectural Guidelines ............................ ......... III-7
a. Introduction ......................................... .........III-7
b. Building Mass, Form, and Scale ......................... .........III-7
c. Materials and Colors .................................. .......:. III-7
d. Roof Structures ....................................... ........ III-]0
e. Windows and Doors ................................... ........III-12
f. Architectural Details ................................... ........ III-12
g. Patio Covers ......................................... ...
..III-12
3. Village "B" Architectural Guidelines ............................ ...
........ III-13
a. Introduction ......................................... ........III-13
b. Building Mass, Form, and Scale ......................... ........III-13
c. Materials and Colors .................................. ........III-19
d. Roof Structures ....................................... ........ III-19
e. Windows and Doors ................................... ........III-19
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page iii
Margarita Village fable of contents
f. Architectural Details .......................... ................III-20
4. Village "C" Architectural Guidelines .................... ................III-22 _J
a. Introduction ................................. ................ III-22
b. Building Mass, Form and Scale .................. ................III-22
c. Materials and Colors .......................... ................III-22
d. Roof Stmctores ............................... ................ III-27
e. Windows and Doors ........................... ................III-28
f. Architectural Details .......................... .................III-31
D. LANDSCAPE ARCHTI'ECTURAL GUIDELINES ............... ................III-32
1. Introdu ction ........................................ ................ IlI-32
a. General Information ........................... ................III-32
b. Golf Community Landscaping (Village "A") ..:.... ................III-32
2. Village "A" Landscaping Requirements .................. ................III-33
a. Project.Entry Accent Palms ..................... :...............III-33
b. Evergreen Background Grove Trees .............. ................III-35
c. Informal Street Tree Groupings .............~..... ................ III-35
d. Collector Loop Streetscape Trees ................ ................III-36
e. Golf Course Landscaping ....................... ................III-36
f. Plant Materials Palette ......................... ................III-37
g. Streetscape .................................. ................III-40
h. Arterial Highway Perimeter Streetscape ........... ................III-41
i. Major and Secondary Highway Streetscenes ........ ................III-44
j. Multi-Family Housing Landscape Requirements ..... ................III-47
k. Edison/MWD Easement Streetsca
pe .............. III-48
................ ~
1. Golf Course ................................. ................III-48
m. Entry Monumentation .......................... ................III-48
n. Entry Monumentation Lighting .................. ................III-54
o. Community Walls and Fencing .................. ................III-54
p. Park and Recreation Amenities .................. ................III-57
q. Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility ....... ................III-58
3. Village "B" Landscaping Requirements .................. ................III-59
a. Project Streetscenes ........................... ................III-59
b. Plant Materials Palette ......................... ................III-61
c. Streetscape .................................. ................III-64
d. MWD Easement Streetscape .................... ................III-69
e. Entry Monumentation .......................... ................III-69
f. Entry Monumentation Lighting .................. ................III-70
g. Community Walls and Fences ................... ................III-70
h. Pazk and Recreation Amenities .................. ................III-77
i. Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility ....... ................III-77
4. Village "C" Landscaping Requirements .................. ................III-80
a. ProjectStreetscenes ........................... ................III-80
b. Plant Materials Palette ....................:.... ................III-88
c. Streetscape .................................. ................III-92
d. Commercial Use Landscape Requirements ......... ................III-93
e. Apartment Housing Landscape Requirement ........ ................III-99
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page iv
Margarita Village fable of contents
f. Edison/MWD Easement Streetscape ................ .............III-100
g. Greenbelt/Drainage Corridor ...................... .............III-100
h. Entry Monumentation ............................ .............III-100
i. Community Walls and Fences ..................... .............III-101
j. Parks and Recreation Amenities .................... .............III-106
k. Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility ......... .............III-107
5. Miscellaneous Planting Guidelines ........................ .............III-107
a. Planting Time .................................. .............III-107
b. Climate Constraints ............................. .............III-110
c. Landscape Maintenance Standards ................. .............III-110
d. Horticultural Soils Test ........................:. .............III-110
e. Irrigation ...................................... .............III-111
f. Slope Erosion Control Landscape and Irrigation ....... .............III-111
E. SIGNAGE ................................................. ............. III-112
1. General Intent ........................................ .............III-112
2. Prohibited Signs ...................................... ............. III-113
3. Retail Commercial Monument Signs ...................... .............III-114
4. Building Mounted Signs: Retail Commercial Buildings ....... .............III-115
5. Multi-Tenant Building Signs ............................ .............III-114
6. Community Entry Monumentation ........................ .............III-115
7. DirectionalSignage .................................... .............III-115
8. Temporary Signage .................................... .............III-116
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page v
Margarita Village fable of contents
FYGURE FYGURE TITLE PAGE
II-1 Site Location ................. .....................
.................. II-2
II-2 Vicinity Map ................. ....................................... II-3
II-3 Specific Land Use Plan ......... ....................................... II-5
II-5 Rancho Villages Policy Plan ..... ...................................... II-13
II-6 Entry and Roadway Hierazchy Plan ..................................... II-18
II-7 Open Space and Recreation Plan . ...................................... II-21
II-8 Master Circulation Plan ........ ...................................... II 24
II-9A Roadway Cross-Sections ....... ...................................... II-25
II-9B Roadway Cross-Sections ....... ....................................... II-26
II-10 Offsite Roadway Improvements .. ...................................... II-28
II-l0A Golf Cart Crossings ............ ...................................... II-30
II-11 Master Water Plan ............. ...................................... II-31
II-12 Master Sewer Plan ............ ...................................... II-32
II-13 Phasing Plan ................. ...................................... II-34
II-14 Conceptual Grading Plan ....... ...........'........................... II-41
II-15 Master Drainage Plan .......... ...................................... II-49
II-16 ~ Planning Areas l,2 & 3 ........ ...................................... II-52
II-17 Planning Areas 4,5 & 6 ........ ...................................... II-56 ~
II-18 Plamm~ Areas 7 & 8
g ..........
......................................
II-60
II-19 Planning Areas9 & 10/11/12 .... ...................................... II-63
II-20 Planning Areas l3 & 14 ........ ...................................... II-66
II-2l Planning Areas l5 & 16 ........ ...................................... II-70
II-22 Planning Areas l7 & 18 ........ ...................................... II-73
II-23 Planning Areas l9/20/21 ........ ...................................... II-76
II-24 Planning Areas 22 & 23 ........ ...................................... II-80
II-25 Planning Areas 24 & 25 ........ ...................................... II-83
II-26 Planning Areas 26, 27 & 28 ..... ...................................... II-87
II-27 Planning Areas 29 & 30 ........ ...................................... II-91
II-28 Planning Areas 31, 32 & 32A .... ...................................... II-95
II-29 Planning Areas 33,'34, 35 & 36 .. ...................................... II-99
II-30 Planning Areas 37, 38, 39, 40 & 41 .................................... II-104
II-31 Planning Areas 42, 43, 44 & 45 .. ..................................... II-109
II-32 Planning Area 46 .............. ..................................... II-115
III-1 Village Concept Plan .......... ....................................... III-3
III-2 Village "A": Typical Elevations . ....................................... III-8
III-3 Village "A": Typical Elevations . .......................................III-9
III-4 Village "A": Typical Architectural Details; Roof Details .................... III-] 1
III-5
III-6 Village "A": Typical Architectural
Village "B": Typical Elevations . Details; Window/Door Treatment ..........III-14
......................................III-15
III-7 Village "B": Typical Elevations . ...................................... III-16
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page vi
Margarita Village fable of contents
III-8 Village "B": Typical Elevations .:................................. ....III-17
III-9 Village "B»: Typical Elevations ..........................:........ ....III-18
III-10 Village "B": Typical Architectural Details ........................... ....III-21
III-11 Village "C": Typical Elevations ................................... ....III-23
III-12 Village "C": Typical Elevations ................................... ....III-24
III-13 Village "C": Typical Elevations ................................... ....III-25
III-14 Village "C": Typical Elevations ................................... ....III-26
III-15 Village "C": Typical Architectural Details; Roof Details ......... ........ ....III-29
III-16 Village "C": Typical Architectural Details; Window/Door Treatment ..... ....III-30
III-17 Village "A": Conceptual Landscape Plan, Planning Areas 33-38 .......... .... III-34
III-18 Village "A": Section E-1 Arterial Highway Landscape Streetscene-
Rancho California Road ...........:.............................. ....III-42
III-19 Village "A": Section E-2 Arterial Highway Landscape Streetscene-
Mazgarita Road .........................:.......:....:.......... ....III-43
III-20 Village "A": Section A-1 Major and Secondary Highway
Landscape Streetscene -Flat Condition .............................. ....III-45
III-21 Village "A": Section A-2 Major and Secondary Highway
Landscape Streetscene -Slope Condition 20' .......................... ....III-46
III-22 Village "A": Major Project Entry Monumentation Plan ................. ....III-50
III-23 Village "A": Major Project Entry Monumentation Elevation ............. ....III-51
III-24 Village "A": Minor Project Entry Monumentation Plan ................. ....III-52
III-25 Village "A": Minor Project Entry Monumentation Elevation ............. ....III-53
III-26 Village "A": Project Intersection Identification Monumentation Plan
_ . ..III-55
III-27 Village "A": :
:::
Wall and Fencing Details ::
..III-56
III-27A Village "A": Pazk Site (Planning Area 44) ............................ ....III-58
III-28 Village "B": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Areas 2-1 Z) .......... ....III-60
III-29 Village "B": Section A-1 Major and Secondary Highway Landscape-
F1atCondition .................................................. ....III-65
III-30 Village "B": Section A-2 Major and Secondary Highway
Landscape -Streetscene Slope Condition ............................. ....III-66
III-31 Village "B": Section D Equestrian Trail at Major and Secondary
Highway Landscape Streetscenes ................................... ....III-67
III-32 Village "B": Major Project Entry Monumentation ..................... ....III-71
III-33 Village "B": Major Project Entry Monumentation Elevation ............. ....III-72
III-34 Village "B": Minor Project Entry Monumentation ..................... ....III-73
III-35 Village "B": Village "B": Minor Project Entry Monumentation Elevation .. ....III-74
III-36 Village "B": Fence Details ....................................... ....III-76
III-37 Village "B": Pazk Site (Planning Area 5) ............................ ....III-78
III-38 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Area 13) ............ ....III-81
III-39 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Area 14, 19) ......... ....III-82
III-40 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Area 15-18) .......... ....III-83
III-41 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Areas 2Q 22, 23, 25, 26, 27) .III-84
III-42 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Areas 21, 24) ......... ....III-85
III-43 Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Areas 28, 29, 31) ...... ....III-86
III-44
III-45 Village "C":
Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan (Planning Area 30, 32, 32A) .....
Section A-1 Major and Secondary Highway Landscape- ....III-87
F1at Condition .................................................. ....III-94
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page vii
Margarita Village Viable of contents
III-46 Village "C": Section A-2 Major and Secondary Highway
Landscape Streetscene -Slope Condition ................... ..............III-95
III-47 Village "C": Section B Equestrian Trail, Greenbelt Corridor
and Arterial Highway Landscape Streetscene ............... ..............III-96
III-48 Village "C": Section C Equestrian Trail, Greenbelt Condor,
Major and Secondary Highway Landscape Streetscene ........ ............. .III-97
III-49 Village "C": Section D Equestrian Trail at Major and Secondary
Highway Landscape Streetscene .......................... ..............III-98
III-50 Village "C": Minor Project Entry Monumentation ........... .............III-102
III-51 Village "C" Minor Project Entry Monumentation Elevation ... .............III-103
III-52 Village "C": Fence Details ............................. .............III-105
III-53 Village "C": Pazk Site (Planning Area 18) ...........:.:... .............III-108
III-54 Village "C": Pazk Site (Planning Area 38) ................. .............III-109
III-55 Typical Mazguee Signs ................................. .............III-117
q
f
q
.~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page viii
Margarita Village fable of contents
TABLE NO. TABLE NAME PAGE
II-1 ProjectSummary ............................... ..................... II-10
II-2 Detailed Land Use Summary ..................... ..................... II-11
II-3 Housing Types ................................ ..................... II-16
II-4 PhaseISummary .............................. ..................... II-36
II-5 Phase II Summary .............................. ..................... II-37
II-6 Phase III Summary ............................. ..................... II-38
II-7 Phase IV Summary ............................. ..................... II-39
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page ix
Margarita Village I. Summary of Changes
d. Mammary of changes-Amendment 1Vo. 7, Apri12OO5
Paragraph A from Amendment 3 will be deleted and replaced with the following
amended Paragraph A. New Items i through iii (listed below) will be added after
Paragraph A, and the previously existing Items 1 through 3 and a through g will remain
after Items i-iii.
O
A. Specific ]Plan
The Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP No. 199) was originally adopted by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors on August 26, 1986 by Resolution No. 86-355. Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 was approved by
the Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1988 via Resolution No. 88-471. Upon incorporation by the City of
Temecula in 1989, Margarita Village was in the jurisdiction of the City. Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 was
approved by the Temecula City Council on March 26, 1996. Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 was approved by
the Temecula City Council on October 7, 1997. Specific Plan Amendment No. 4 was approved by the
Temecula City Council on January 27, 1998. Specific Plan Amendment No. 5 was approved by the Temecula
City Council on October 10, 2000, and Amendment No. 6 was approved by [he Temecula City Council on
January 11, 2005. The following paragraphs describe the changes to Specific Plan No. 199 that have occurred
based on these amendments.
Specific Plan Amendment No. 7 is being presented to the City of Temecula and proposes the following changes:
i. Planning Area 7
Planning Area 7 is proposing to be amended from 12 acres and 12 dwelling units [o approximately
10.97 acres and 29 dwelling units. Planning Area 7 is proposing a Specific Plan Land Use change
from Low (L) Density Residential (0.4-2 du/acre) classification to Medium (M) Density Residential
(2-5 du/acre). The Specific Plan amendment would also include a zone change of PA 7 from the
L-1 (one acre minimum lo[ size) Residential District to Low Medium (7,200 sq. ft. minimum lot
size) Residential District.
With the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, Planning Area 7 would consists of 29 dwelling units
on approximately 10.97 acres with a minimum lo[ size of 7,200 net square feet. The homes in
Planning Area 7 shall have a minimum of 2,200 square feet of living area.
ii. Planning Area 9A
Planning Area 9A is proposing to be amended to separate this area from the existing Planning Area
9. Planning Area 9A is approximately 7.35 acres of undeveloped residential land whereas Planning
Area 9 has been developed as a three-acre private recreation community center.
Planning Area (PA) 9A is proposing [o develop 8 single family residential units on approximately
7.35 acres. PA 9 would maintain the existing Land Use of Low (L) Density Residential (0.4-2
du/acre) and would change the Specific Plan zoning from L-1 Residential District (one acre
minimum lot size) [o L-2 Residential District (20,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size). The homes in PA
9A shall have a minimum of 2,500 square feet of living area, shall be one story in height and shall
be strategically placed to allow view corridors for the existing residences to the west.
O
Specific Plan No. 3, Amendment No. 7 Page I-
Margarita Village I. Summary of Changes
O No change of zoning or land use is being proposed for Planning Area 9.
iii. Repagination
Due to the modifications of Planning Areas 7 and 9A and, repagination will occur where necessary
throughout the Specific Plan. Page III-I4 shall also be added as none currently exists.
O
O Specific Plan No. 3, Amendment No. 7 Page I-
l~. ~ununary of
~o ~~1V'1(l~'ll~1LOll ®~+ ~~~~~~
L~. ~PECIFIIC IPII.AN
The MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan (SP No. 199) was originally adopted by the Riverside County
Boazd of Supervisors on August 26, 1986 through Resolution No. 86-355. Specific Plan Amendment No.
1 was approved by the Boazd of Supervisors on September 6, 1988 via Resolution No. 88-471. Upon
incorporation of the City of Temecula in 1989, MARGARITA VILLAGE was in the jurisdiction of the City.
Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 was approved by the Temecula City Council on Mazch 26, 1996. Specific
Plan Amendment No. 3 was approved by the Temecula City Council on October 7, 1997. The following
paragraphs describe the changes to Specific Plan No. 199 that have occurred based on these amendments.
~. ~Desng>m ~aaga~eIln>mes
The Design Guidelines, contained in Section III of the Specific Plan, were added through
Amendment No. 1 and apply throughout the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan azea. Adhering
to the village concept of the plan, these guidelines establish azchitectural and landscape
azchitectural design criteria for each of the three villages within the project. The design criteria for
each village aze distinctive, yet consistency and compatibility is maintained throughout the project.
These Design Guidelines have been updated through Amendment No. 3 to reflect the shift in
Village "A" from a retvement community to a predominantly family-oriented community. Wording
has been added to the Specific Plan that gives the Director of Cotnmunity Development the
authority to allow minor variations from Specific Plan standards and design guidelines without a
Specific Plan Amendment.
2. [~dll~n~n®>ixaY ~>r®~er~y
Approximately 127 acres of land was added to the Specific Plan by Amendment No. 1. This 127-
acre azea is located south of Rancho Vista Road and west of Butterfield Stage Road in the southeast
corner of the property.
3. ]La>mdl ~Jse ~llnaanges
The following is a summary of land use changes proposed as a part of Specific Plan Amendments
No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3:
a. host ®ffice
A 5.0+ acre site (Planning Area 32A) was designated in Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 for post
office use on the southeast corner of Rancho California and Mazgarita Roads. This use is
compatible with the commercial and multi-family uses approved for adjacent properties at this
intersection. As part of Specific Plan Amendment No. 1, the church site neazby (Planning Area 31)
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page I-]
Margarita Village . l~. summary of changes
was reduced in size and the Medium density residential (Planning Area 32) reconfigured in response
to the introduction of the post office site.
b. Village "A"
Specific Plan Amendment No. 2 deleted the requirement for retirement housing in Village "A."
Village `A' is now planned to provide a variety of housing types which will appeal to various
segments of the housing mazket including, but not limited to, first-time home buyers, move-up
families, empty-nesters, and retirees. Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 deleted the .7.5-acre
commercial site planned for the northwest comer of the intersection of Rancho California Road and
Meadows Pazkway. The deletion of the commercial center within Village "A" came as a result of
a decrease in the number of dwelling units for Village "A" and the subsequent reduction in the
demand for commercial uses to serve this portion of the Mazgarita Village Specific Plan. A 6.2-
acre commercial site is still planned for the southeast comer of the intersection of Rancho
California Road and Meadows Parkway. The density of Planning Area 42 (formerly Planning Area
43) was revised to allow High density multi-family residential uses where Medium High density
residential uses were originally planned. This revision was enacted in response to the mazket
conditions at the time of Specific Plan Amendment No. 3. The addition ofmulti-family residential
products in Village "A" increases the variety of options available to potential home buyers looking
to reside within the Mazgarita Village project. Overall, Specific Plan Amendment No. 3 reduced
the number of dwelling units in Village "A" from 1,666 units to 1,546 units and reduced the total
number of dwelling units within the Specific Plan from 4,047 units to 3,923 units. In order to retain
the continuity of the Specific Plan document, several planning azeas within Village "A"'were
renumbered, consolidated or realigned, resulting in minor renumbering of Planning Areas 40, 41, „10
42, 43 and 44. The number 39 was not utilized for the Planning Areas in Specific Plan Amendment
No. 3.
c. Village `B"
The original Specific Plan proposed a variety of single family detached units ranging from 5,500
squaze feet to one acre in this village. Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 proposed essentially the
same range of lot sizes as the originally approved Specific Plan, except that the minimum lot size
was no longer 6,000 squaze feet. Due to changes in the mazket, and in order to be more compatible
with adjacent existing and proposed land uses, the densities in Planning Areas 2, 3, 4, 6 and
10/11/12 were slightly increased. The lot sizes are now minimum 6,000 (average 7,800) squaze feet
for Planning Areas 4 and 6. The minimum lot size in Planning Areas 8 and 10/11/12 is minimum
7,200 squaze feet, with an average lot size of 10,750 squaze-feet. Similazly, Planning Areas 2 and
3 have a 7,200 square foot minimum, but lots in these areas average in excess of 12,350 squaze feet.
Planning Areas 7 and 9, adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road, are still planned as estate lots, however
the minimum lot size is now one acre rather than''/x acre as stipulated in the original Specific Plan.
An 11.5 acre pazk is also now proposed within Village `B" (see discussion under "6. Pazks/School"
below).
d. Village "C"
This area increased in size due to the addition of d27 acres in the southeast corner by approval of
Specific Plan Amendment No. 1. Uses in the southeast area are compatible with those already
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page I-2
~. ~ununary of
approved for Planning Areas 13, 14 and 20 and with the proposed uses in Vail Meadows to the
south. Single family detached housing at an average density of 3.1 du/ac is now planned for the
added area. In addition, a ten acre school site and a 4.3 acre public pazk were added (see discussion
under item f., Parks/School below). The remainder of the uses, with the exception of the added post
office, remain exactly as proposed in the original Specific Plan.
e. Circulation
The Maser Circulation Plan for MARGARITA VILLAGE remains essentially the same as originally
proposed, except that South General Kearney (secondary - 88' ROW) was deleted between
Meadows Pazkway and Butterfield Stage Road in Specific Plan Amendment No. 1. It has been
replaced by an internal system of collector and local streets. A traffic study was prepared for the
Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 to support the change. Design standards for local roadways within
Village "A" were added as a part of Amendment No. 3. Criteria for establishing golf cart usage
of the local roadways within Village "A" and for golf cart crossings were also added as a part of
Amendment No. 3.
f. Parks/School
In redesigning the eastern portion of the project for Specific Plan Amendment No. I, two additional
parks totaling 16 acres were added (Planning Areas 5 and 18). When added to the 9.2 acre park
already planned, the total project park acreage stood at 25.3 acres. Specific Plan Amendment No.
3 also involved the inclusion of a 12.5-acre park at the southwest corner of I.a Serena Way and
Meadows Pazkway. The total pazk acreage for the project-now stands at 37.5 acres. The actual size
of the 12.5-acre park in Planning Area 44 will be determined when subdivision maps are submitted
for the individual Planning Areas within Village "A". If the number of units. achieved is less than
the number allowed by this Specific Plan, then the park acreage may be reduced by a commensurate
amount based on the City's park requirement formulas. Facilities within the pazks include
softball/multi-purpose fields, volleybalUbasketball courts, adventure play, tot lots, picnic areas,
walks and trails. For exact details, please refer to plans and descriptions in Section III, Design
Guidelines, of this document. At the request of Temecula Union School District, a 10 acre
elementary school site (Planning Area 18) was added in Specific Plan Amendment No. 1.
The document that follows is a rewritten Specific Plan document that has been revised to reflect the above
changes. The major sections of the document are as follows:
~.• SECTION I: SUMMARY OF CHANGES -Describes the changes that have occurred to the MARGARITA
VILLAGE Specific Plan as a result of Amendments No. 1 No. 2 and No. 3.
:• SECTION II: PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN -Includes the major plan elements, such as land use,
circulation, infrastructure and phasing. This Section also includes planning standazds for individual
planning areas.
• SECTION III: DESIGN GUIDELINES -Includes architectural and landscape architectural design criteria.
Specific Plan No. ]99: Amendment No. 3 Page I-3
Margarita Village ~. project jDevelopment flan
~ IIIIo ~~°®,~~~~ ~~~~ll®~~~~~ ~ll~~
Ao IInntr®a~uac~n®>m
The purpose of this Specific Plan is to provide the City with land use planning information relative to the
future development of the MARGARITA VII.LAGE site. It will serve to provide a "framework" through which
future, more detailed land development plans and information may be reviewed. This Section (Section II)
provides an overview of the location, existing conditions, and mazket profile of the site. Additionally, a
detailed land use plan is included, as well as a number of subsections which provide descriptions and
development standazds for various infrastructural elements.
The following project location description provides a brief discussion of the proposed land use modi-
fications.
ll. project lLocation/ll~escription
a. Site I,ocation/Vicinity iVlau
1) Iltancho California and ][2ancho Villages IItelationship
The MARGARITA VILLAGE project site is located on 1,396.1 acres in the City of Temecula in
Riverside County, California. The City of Temecula encompasses approximately 26 squaze miles,
and its Sphere of Influence covers another 24 squaze miles. The City was incorporated on
December 1, 1989. Extending along both sides of Interstate 15, Temecula is located within five
miles of the Riverside-San Diego County line and approximately 20 miles from the Riverside-
Orange County line (see Figure II-1, Site Location). It is bounded on the west by the coastal Santa
Ana Mountains separating Orange from Riverside County and on the south by the Santa Margarita
and Aqua Tibia Mountains which separates the City of Temecula from San Diego County. The City
is located about 75 miles south of Los Angeles and 55 miles north of San Diego.
Various sections of the City are being developed for urban use, including the azea encompassing
MARGARITA VII.LAGE (See Figure II-2, Vicinity Map). Currently, developed uses within the vicinity
of the project site include residential, commercial, and industrial uses.
The site itself is rirnmed by Mazgarita Road on the west, La Serena Way to the north; proposed
Butterfield Stage Road on the east, and the easterly extension of Rancho Vista Road on the south.
The site can also be accessed via South General Kearney and Rancho California Roads, running
east-west through the site. The property is a mile and a half east of the I-15/Rancho California
Road Interchange; 12 miles west of Vail Lake; four miles north of the east-west extension of
Highway 79; and eight miles south of Lake Skinner.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-1
_®
~--
U
O
=w
W~
, C7
f "1~rJ f:y~ 1 r~ ~~,~ i~~ trfyr ~ y` j ~` j 1`. a~4y ~ r, ~`~~ , r LL
, raa~ 4t\Y xv'r I _(':~~~~, •~$ rf Itlt"W~•'~"~'T;~.-'~ ~
.I ` k ~ ry , ~ lq 11414~~~,~~; 4 r Y\Fr 'lJrl~t\p~p ~i ~! ~ \t,^ S y
ry f ~! ,' r" ) 1 7a'" ~.ISS ,/ f N'C>~~jardn ~ ~~ \ ~! '
j '~ .' . ~ /t rR ,~~:J , \~'~J Iq {fk ~ I:, ) Z Z~I 1.f~1: t ... `r~ r,
.. t i~ P : Qi~ty ) <\~~ ) I { 1 v~Jrl. ~r O ,r
r riF% / c ~s~1 ° )
- % ~.. l~r~l la ~ p ~ rYfl/~~ 13i1 ~7y~r~f f~rlF~ ~f~~7T`~ip q~l G' W >w
\ -l' if ~r ~ ~' :.~ `7'!4Y r}, `II`4{~'~~Ll~jyl~~~",r,. )~~~~ i; 0a' ~'~~ I~
C. r.. 4 s ... J, 7.~ ~~ ~.f \~~ iY~i .r ~11 d<^~\.CF~,> I ~ .{,`.6C J7 ' '~.'s!. ~ O ~` 1. .
1~ t'r" 7 ,~ i,./~ f ! ~ j 1 ~ {f{r1 f_. I~y'k'N°a ~' - ~ 1~i h ~t )
y vl
(\ c.~} i ~ j ~'/: ) 4. ~r ~~ ~~; ~ . XJ ! 1~' ~{1~ q nd ~ r ~1 Jt;~ ~,{ Ir'Q, ~ .. \
2 (~/'L. /f t } I Y'. }111 +t ~4Q~.' O
''!5 '~/A jr f ~O"i/~ayl ~'~1 1~.114t~ } ~. I. V 7. 141 ~ rj':3 d ,\_°
,. 1~i 7 ~`. (.t9.. ~ ./~f~ ~. _ .. M ,blri _l, r ,t~ tSft tll tSt..o! p ~ , 'i
c I I i -ei ~ .:'y !~, ) ~ i > ?~r ~.y~ to ~ , < ,~ y
(~ 'r , fu t. ~ ~'J .,~{S~~'Fr{~`~. ~tl ~ ~~ ~~.j,` `' (ltJ h')p~~}' ~ O V ; r" ~
r
il~,. - J ~ 7d wt u, $,~, a, i~ :` r .,!rZ~1Ja , ~ \
' 1. 41 \~.- ~ <///~//~~~Yr,r oGZI F~~/ff',ta/' ~~11~'t, vF Fr,(~~' ~4-Wyl. \
~:' /}Y_ ~ : } u ~ G , . ,FII /1) I~{~'NZ 1 s (r'ySt~t'~`1~~ rJ ~•iti ~t,h :~ t Q W f d • :~/
`~~ J - ~,~: 1~'~~1/!%7~ttr .cl'ONO ~~~ lA'.~11~7\~ i~~ ,Op I~rn:-, ~I~oiy J . ~ ._.
i ,4f 1:: ~~r^~-1.iluvlw~f to;1 Gx1 ~'r1` I.r= ~y i / C al to
)`• r S, 1 V ,} <, \.1711;, ~} 1Y 1 y ~ U r S r ~ 1~ ~ m .
, S rt ~ 11'r rG ~-i~ ~>' .t~i +§,<y~}~ N\ ~f t' I
,.'° `n' ~rf ~l ~r:~r~j t1d Fw j ~ ~'~2 a ~$. I'7~0 ) r ~
It( ti' .rt~. 9Tq ~J ~t~9 v,? 1 f ~: 1 F~,~~l_`}tt J 51 ~,r~. ~~ s _ ..a '
5.>~ t lii }Y S,'f ii J~ W] <~:' ,, tac,9IW ) ~.~ I i r.. t~\j-r ~ :1. y
~l>~~.~~ ~ ~~ c, ~. ~,/,~ F/@,I};iu 11 \:^ ~ ~,:, ~ "':~ Z ~) : 1yE~ r r , }Il\! t~• d '' ~~ ~~,,
C~f-e~3. :~.. { :. ~~.: ~uIr "fir ~ 1 C~e ~ ~`~~`' ~y\ i ~~ .:) J } ~t k}s lUtjL~J 1. 'l f'~ ) .
I ~ ~ S > it { i~~ 'Z ~ ~" I ~~ ~~1C I, ~~1: I 1~_~~'lQ~ x i,` ~ .1, ,. "~,
. ~ 7 t .. ~ r ~ 1,) fr" '~w } r~.,.r ~nw SI ~~ ~k`~ 1\. li '1„0 1) \,>O ~'.) 1 4 ~ ~~ ~ a. ~ - ~ry ; .,
l I e ~11>!!~y .i.(.7S /~ `.~°` `r~ n JUr ~I °r~ ':: p,0..
i ~ ~ 1 Ili +T ~.E~a~1 ~' r,~'a J", t t r`I .'[II` C:j~jN ¢ r' d PPp m ~ I 3~-.
v r - JrJ'. ~h 1 f I 'ACmY r C.' \ , ~~1/~/ ~(~r'y,w2 \r p.~ Q\~
I , .~~ / I, _ 5, .. `1i A ~ k 4 . \\ ~W~a,,3~,~~I~~~ o U'{11t tfi3x ~~Wx`a~ H~ CL•PPCjP. ~ ~\ ' ,~
/ 2~y r S ~~ I ' ~ ~/ ~5„ ~~~ 3 `' I~`~~~ fli,~~i0. ,\t ~¢si~, 1\; rUl 9 '~Q ~ .'y,1 :rrr4
c ~
t i~' .,aY JJr .. .J ~.c 1 N It/~..y. ~ t. ) Ff
1. ''N / I ~ ~' :, I ~4' 'Ir 1 r l;l .9' y ~, ,.I Q' ..,g rr .:.,
' ~ 1, 1 i\' ~ f - S. ~ ~~{l ~ , ~L;.. ..wl 3 ~ r _' j r ~ 1 n _'„r'}~ r 1 ,o~sl
._ . .. __ ._' a .._ _ o ,. N , e
,r ,
' I 'S'
/ - . ~ O r Y x~~ of 7~ f f j Y
,.. .. r l
r ... ._J b I .' 26 ~ 9 a} fi 1 f
d r
7f '~:> _ % V `~S if ( .Q`1r) r r `, \I ) ,
,17~'. '.y~ h• ~ti r~r' rl~..~-~ai), p.111 J~r ;i'1 i\,+,~~`~
,1 .
..' r,,,.~ ~ nom. \~'.C.",~~iJ~v'F ,' r~11 ~ ~ t..,a
\ .i J r~( ~ t~//mss-••+t~( Jn {r~Ff !~~{,Iru~l: 1 ~ ~}~~ ~ L~'
, \
;1 / * r f{~ ( of >'.~ J~71\!J ~ -
S :1 ,s.
}1.: 'r/ ;'~ - ~ :.~~.~~ ~ ~~i' ~j~r~•(1)`/t~ ~ 1 ~', I ~2,^ 171 \ ~r.
~'~ r
~ r ~ ~ ~ II Nt~~' r A r r t , ( ~'7 al,`,.f j 'l.l ~ ~ ~t Xf `- > rJJ~I;, } \., t `2
,~ ~' a
Y. .,A);S t~ ~ . 51,~ir ~r, i )~+i` j"L f{,~, ,~''_~rJ~ lj N L~~ f )~,i,~~
,
"~ ~~1
,.
! .
~ /^`
~.../ ~
O
~o
a ¢<v
~r~
0
FIGURE II-2
!! U~~U~~~ ll Ibub~~
.y"'`~
v ~~
~~~~~~Il~~ ~InIlIl~~~
- II-3
~,
2) ®n-Site ]Land Use and Zoning
flan
The site is currently composed of disturbed, undeveloped open space, interrupted by the"Not a Part"
Heritage Mobilehome Pazk in the northwestern sector of the site. Three other "Not a Part" pazcels
lie along Margarita Road in the southwestern corner of the site, in the east-central portion of the
property, and at the corner of Rancho California and Butte~eld Stage Roads.
The property is zoned R-R (Rural Residential).
3) Surrounding band Use
Major existing land uses in the vicinity include existing and approved estate lots and vacant open
space located northeast, north and east and south of the site. Among these are the Meadowview
(north and west) and La Serena (north) developments, estate lost and vineyazds east of the
MARGARTI'A VILLAGE site; Temecula Valley High School and Linfield Private School to the south.
Land immediately west of Mazgarita Road (the western project boundary) is currently undeveloped
but being processed for a Tentative Tract Map (TM 20735) allowing future urban use. This
includes proposed very low and low density single family detached units, patio homes, a school and
commercial uses west of the intersection of Mazgarita and Rancho California Roads. The
commercial use will tie in with village core uses proposed on the project site.
4) Project YDescription
The land use plan for MARGARITA VIl.LAGE conforms to the land uses identified in the Land Use
Element of the City of Temecula General Plan. The site features a "target" total of 3,923units of
family-oriented residential uses, in ]ow, medium, medium-high and high densities (2.8 du/ac
overall). A commercial site, two elementary school sites, a church site, a school administration site,
a post office site, four neighborhood pazks and a recreation center aze also proposed as part of the
master plan. (See Figure II-3, Specific Land Use Plan).
b. Market Profile
It is the intent of the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan to be unified in overall theme but vaned
in individual chazacter, to provide complementary land uses. Specific mazket objectives aze as
follows:
To reflect anticipated mazketing needs and public demand by providing a diversity of
housing types and locations within the City of Temecula.
To provide land uses that extend and aze consistent with ongoing development in the City
of Temecula and which comply with the land use designations and policies in the City's
General Plan.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-4
Margarita Village ~ IDI. ]project development ]Plan
~J
~ To provide detached and attached, high-quality housing to service a broad mazket segment
including, but not limited to, fast-time, move-up; growing family and retirement buyers.
n To provide move-up opportunities for present residents of Temecula and surrounding
Riverside and San Diego communities.
c To reinforce the "country community" identity of Temecula through the control of project
design elements such as azchitecture, landscaping, color, paving, walls, fencing, signage and
entry treatments.
o . - To attract commercial uses that will be community-oriented toserve community needs.
o To provide recreational and visual amenities in conjunction with strong community design
to attract the homeowner.
o To provide an aesthetic and functional open space system that responds to site conditions
in its configuration and to anticipated demands of existing and future City of Temecula
residents:
B. ]Focused IEI[lI8 ]Format and ]Processing ~auidelines
Q The MARGARITA VILLAGE project was originally processed through Riverside County and was
adopted by the Board of Supervisors prior to incorporation of the City of Temecula. Environmental
information in the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan/Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
document, focused in detail on only nine concerns specific to this site. A "Focused EIIt" was
originally prepazed because environmental analysis for the project site was covered by the Draft
EIR for Rancho Villages%Policy Plan General Plan Amendment (completed and approved by
Riverside County in 1981), and the Specific Plan was prepazed for consistency with that document.
As a part of this amendment, additional reports pertaining to traffic, geology and fiscal impacts have
been prepazed.
The Focused EIR only discusses in detail these topes from the County oufline: Section II.C.1)
Seismic Safety; 2) Slopes and Eiosion; 4) Flooding; 10) Agriculture; 11) Wildlife/Vegetation; and
Section II.D.1) Circulation; 2) Water and Sewer; and 10) Health Services. Additional environmen-
tal topics will be covered in general terms, referencing the Draft EIR for Rancho Villages/Policy
Plan General Plan Amendment.
The original MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan/Focused EIR had been prepared in accordance
with the provisions of the Riverside County Land Use Ordinance No. 348 and Section 6454 et• seo.
of the California Government Code relating to Specific Plans. Because this document was a
Focused EIIt, it was prepazed according to Section 712 of the Rules of Riverside County
implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Section 15069.8 of the State
guidelines).
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No: 2 Page II-6
Margarifa Village ~Il~. project development plan
The original Draft EIR for Rancho Villages/Policy Plan General Plan Amendment on which this
Focused EIR was based was a Program EIR. As such, it addressed issues related to ultimate '~
development of the Rancho Villages azea as a whole, based on the most definitive data available.
At each of the subsequent discretionary levels of project review, that Program EIR serves as the
master environmental document. Each specific activity (e.g., Tentative Tract Maps, Parcel Maps,
Site Plans, Use Permits, etc.), is examined in light of that Program EIR to determine whether
additional, more detailed environmental analysis is necessary. Since the MARGARITA VILLAGE
Focused EIR was prepazed pursuant to the Rancho Villages Program EIR, the Focused EIR was,
upon certification, to serve as part of the Program EIR for the Rancho Villages azea and the
MARGARITA VILLAGE project site.
In general processing terms, if it is determined that the Rancho Villages Program EIR adequately
addresses environmental impacts associated with any proposed activity in the Rancho Villages
vicinity, not new environmental documentation would be required: If a proposed project could
potentially have a significant impact on the environment which was not addressed in the Progtam
EIR, but the potential impact will be effectively mitigated, a Negative Declazation can be prepared.
In the case where specific issues associated with an activity were not adequately addressed in the
Program EIR,` but only minor additions or changes aze necessary to make the EIR adequate, a
Supplement/Addendum to the Program EIR may be prepared. The Supplement/Addendum to the
EIR need contain only the information necessary to make the Program EIR adequate for the
proposed project. In the case of MARGARITA VILLAGE, additional, more detailed environmental
analysis was provided in the Focused EIR packaged with the Specific Plan, to assure all issues were
fully addressed for agency evaluation. These options accord with the provisions for agency
evaluation. These options accord with the provisions of CEQA and aze encouraged by the State, r
to avoid duplicative reconsiderations of basic policy considerations.
Persons reviewing this document should keep in mind that material provided herein is, under State
law, informational in nature. It is intended to enable appropriate public agencies to evaluate
environmental effects associated with the proposed project, plus measures to reduce the magnitude
of any adverse effects, and to consider alternatives to the project as proposed. Further environmen-
tal review will be required at more specific levels of pioject implementation, and these reviews may
reveal additional specific mitigation measures which will be incorporated into project phases as
they are implemented. The responsible public agencies remain obligated to balance possible
adverse effects against other public objectives, including economic and social factors, in
determining whether the project is acceptable and approved for implementation.
In conjunction with Specific Plan Amendment No. 2; a number of additional studies were
undertaken to update and complement the focused E]R. They include a geotechnical study; traffic
study to further assess Village "B" transportation concerns; and a Kangazoo-Rat trapping and
update study.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-7
Margarifa Village ][][. project ][Development plan
I~. ~peca~nc Allan I[>l>rnplle>~sa~>m>ta~i®n I~>r®g>r~xn
4. -project lLocatlon/l~escription
a. Site Location/Vicinity IVYap
1) Iltancho California and IIYanchti Villages )<telationship
This Specific Land Use Plan is being prepared within the framework of a detailed and comprehen-
sivemulti-disciplinary planning program. Issues such as engineering feasibility, mazket acceptance,
economic- viability, County General Plan goals and objectives, environmental compatibility,
aesthetic satisfaction, development phasing and local community goals were utilized as a basis for
selection of the development plan currently proposed. Specific goals and objectives were
considered in formulating and refining the plan. These include:
~ Provide residential development utilizing the village concept, whereby adequate support
facilities (e.g. commercial uses, circulation, public facilities; open space and recreation) can
be provided in a convenient and efficient manner.
~ Consider topographic, geologic, hydrologic and environmental opportunities and constraints
to create a design that generally conforms to the chazacter of the land by retaining and
utilizing basic existing landfomvs as much as possible.
n Reflect anticipated mazketing needs and public demand by providing a range of housing
types which will be mazketable within the developing economic profile of the City of
Temecula.
~ Integrate the requirements for flood control measures, open space and recreational uses into
the site plan by utilizing existing drainage courses for recreational uses, including a golf
course and natural open space to provide major active recreation opportunities and aesthetic
amenities for the project.
o Provide direct and convenient access to individual residential neighborhoods, recreational
and community activity centers via a safe and efficient circulation system composed of a
network of major highways, collectors and local roadways, each designed for appropriate
traffic and user needs.
n Incorporate projected regional circulation requirements as indicated in the Circulation
Element of the City of Temecula General Plan.
n Create a safe and attractive community that will be an asset to the City of Temecula. Sound
structural design practices and energy conservation measures will be encouraged.
a
Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-8
Margarita Village l[l[. ]Project pDevelopinent.IPlan ,
2) Land Use ®verview
The MARGARITA VILLAGE project is primarily residential in nature, an extension of existing and
planned development occumng in the City to the north,. south, and west. Specific uses proposed
on the 1,336.1-acre site include: residential, commercial, open space slopes, a golf course with
club-house, a recreation center, pazk sites, elementary schools, a church, a school administration
headquarters, a post office, and major roads that frame the project site (see Table II-1, Project
Summary, and Figure II-3, Specific Land Use Plan).
3) Village and 1Veighborhood flan
As noted earlier, the MARGARITA VILLAGE project site overlaps specific portions of the Rancho
Villages Planned Community section of Rancho California.
The Rancho Villages Policy Plan identifies both "Village Cores" and "Residential Transition
Areas: ' The MARGARITA VILLAGE site overlaps two Village Core areas and provides both family
an retirement neighborhoods in Residential Transition Planning Areas B and C. (See Figure II-3,
Specific Land Use Plan, and Figure II-5, Rancho Villages Policy Plan.)
a. Village Cores
The western Village Core azea along Mazgarita Village Road, is proposed north-south, in
an oblong shape between South General Kearny and Rancho Vista Roads. It contains
village support uses, including a public pazk site in the northwestern corner east of
Margarita Road, and higher,density family (medium and medium-low density) neighbor-
hoods along that arterial. As noted in Section II.A.1, a major commercial use is planned
just west of Mazgarita Road access from the site, at Rancho California Road, tying in with
this Village Core created in MARGARITA VQ.LAGE. A middle school site is also planned in
this development area west of Mazgarita Road.
In addition, an eastern Village Core within Planning Area B is identified just south of La
Serena Way in the eastern half of the site. The eastern intersection of Rancho California
Road and Meadows Pazkway (just south of the conceptual Core shown in Planning Area B).
This area contains two commercial centers, located to serve MARGARITA VILLAGE
residents. The centers aze located at the intersection of Rancho California Road and
Meadows Parkway. The central portion of MARGARITA VILLAGE is formed by a family-
oriented residential community, containing a range of detached and attached housing types.
Medium and medium-low density family-oriented units are located along the southern edge
of the site, between Rancho California and Rancho Vista Roads, The residential
development in Village "A" is situated azound a golf course, which features a number of
lakes and watercourses throughout.
i
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-9
Margarita Village l[lI. ]Project ][Development ]Plan
a
TABLE II-1
PROTECT SUMMi1RY
35"~a" ~ v
Residential High %ga re ~
29.7 AC '~A&~ec'a" ~
11.5 DU/AC ~aa'y ~°
8-14 DU/AC lode .
333.DIt
Residential Medium High 249.5 AC 5.6 DU/AC 5-8 DU/AC 1,390 DU
Residential Medium 576.7 AC 3.7 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 2,154 DU
Residential Low 35.0 AC 1.3 DU/AC 0.4-2 Du/AC 46 Du
SUBTOTAL -HOUSING 890.2 AC 4.4 DU/AC 3,923 Du
Commercial 6.2 AC
Pazks 37.5 AC
Golf Course &
Club House 141.0 AC
Slopes/Drainage
Facilities 184.5 AC
Elementary Schools 23.0 AC NAT
School
Administration
11.0 AC APPLICABLE
Church Site 5.3 AC
Post Office 5:0 AC
Utility Easements 31.6 AC
Major Roads 60.8 AC
GRAxD TOTALS 1,396.1 Ac 2.8 DU/AC 3,923 Du
'The Tazget Density for each Planning Area within a particular residential density category varies and is represented on
Table II-2. The Tazget Density as provided in this Table is an average, considering all Planning Areas within a residential
category. It is shown to provide an approximate density for each residential category.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-10
Margarita Village ][][. I~roject ILDevelopment ll~lan
TABLE H-2
DETAILED LAND USE SUMMARY - ~ - ~ ~-
e
... ~
.~ a.. ..
2
em ~
e ~
m
w a 2s.-.m...m., u
Low Residential .~
.e
w
,. .
m
e e .''.
13.0
' ._»... ... ~a
2.0 DU/AC
~ .;.~ ~
_n....-,.= a
0.42 DU/AC
~.
~ ~
~.~s..as°~~.....
27
3 Medium Residential 2.2 2.7 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 6
4 Medium Residential 11.0 4.6 DIl/AC 2-5 DU/AC 51
6 Medium Residential 53.0 4.0 Du/AC 2-5 DU/AC 212
7 Low Residential 12.0 1.0 DU/AC 0.421)U/AC 12
8 Medium Residential 21.0 3.6 Du/AC 2-5 Du/AC 76
9 Low Residential 10.0 0.7 Du/AC 0.42 DU/AC 7
10/11/12 Medium Residential 52.8 4.1 Du/AC 2-5 DU/AC 215 .
13 Medium Residential 47.4 23 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 109
14 Medium Residential 38.1 4.6 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 175
15 Medium Residential 80.9 2.8 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC .255
16 Medium Residential 59.5 3.1 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 183
17 Medium Residential 34.4 3.1 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 108
20 Medium Residential 12.1 4.5 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 54
21 Medium High Residential 10.3 5.4 DU/AC 5-8 DU/AC 62
22 Medium Residential 10.9 3.7 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 40
23 Medium Residential 10.2 4.5 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 46
24 Medium High Residential 16.9 5.4 DU/AC S-8 DU/AC 9]
25 Medium Residential 10.9 3.7 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 40
26 Medium Residential 23.5 4.5 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 105
27 Medium Residential 8.1 4.4 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 36
29 Medium Residential 33.8 4.0 DU/AC 2-5 DU/AC 136
30 Medium High Residential 33.4 5.2 Du/AC 5-8 Du/AC 173
32 High Residential 14.4 11.0 DU/AC 8-14 DU/AC 158
33 Medium High Residential 16.0 5.1 DU/AC 5-8 DU/AC 82
34 Medium High Residential 14.7 6.8 Du/AC 5-8 DU/AC 100
(~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-11
~. ~roiect Development flan
O
TABLE II-2
DETAII.ED LAND USE SUMMARY
(Continued)
35 Medium High Residential 66.1 5.5 Du/AC 5-8 Du/AC 356
36 Medium High Residential 7.5 8.0 Du/AC 5-8 DU/AC 62
37 Medium Residendal 23.7 4.6 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 107
38 Medium High Residential 29.3 6.2 DU/AC 5-8 Du/aC 181
40 Medium High Residential 40.1 5.0 Du/AC 5-8 Du/AC 198
42 Medium High Residential 15.2 5.7 Du/AC 5-8 Du/AC 83
43 High Residential 14.6 12.0 Du/AC 8-12 DU/AC 175
44 Medium Residential 43.2 4.6 DU/AC 2-5 Du/AC 200
SUBTOTALS -RESIDENTIAL $9U.2 4.4 DU/AC --- 3,923
19 Commercial 6.2
5 Park 11.5
18 School/Pazk 14.3
38 Pazk 9.2
44 Pazk 12.5
46 Golf Course/Club House
Recreation 141.0
- Slopes/Drainage
Facilities 184.5 NOT
APPLICABLE NOT
APPLICABLE NOT
APPLICABLE
1 Elementary School 13.0
28 School Administration 11.0
31 Church Site 5.3
32a Post Office Site 5.0
- Utility Easements 31.6
--- Major Roads 60.8
GRAND TOTAIS 1,396.1 2.8 Dv/AC --- 3,923
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-12
VILLAGE CORE
.RESIDENTIAL TRANSITION AREA
VILLAGE COREOUfSIDE OF THE POLICY PLAN'
® ,MARGARITA VILLAGE
v ~~
~~--F-PLANNING AREA IDENTIFICATION
~I '~~~~FLANNING~+REA BOUNDARY,
NOTE:
POLICY PLAN AREA ALSO INCLUDES AREASNORTH ,
EAST,AND SOUTH OF MARGARITA VILLAGE THAT ARE
NOT SHOWN HERE "
FIGLaRE II-5
y~~p~~~n~~ ~nIlIl~~~
Tr_i ~
~.
b. Residential Transition Areas
flan
As noted, the site overlaps Residential Transition Planning Area B, providing the
commercial core north of Rancho California Road as mentioned above, along with medium-
low, low and very low density family residential uses. Decreasing intensity is shown in that
eastern sector located adjacent to neighboring estate lots and agricultural (vineyard) azeas.
The northern half of Residential Transition Planning Area C includes the commercial site
south of Rancho California Road and low and medium-low family residential neighbor-
hoods, again adjacent to low density uses existing east of Butterfield Stage Road. Each
neighborhood is linked to the Village Cores by major roadways, and made separate and
district by major topographic features and the roadway system.
b. IItesidential Comuonent
As indicated in Table II-1, Project Summary, and in Table II-2, Detailed Land Use Summary, that
follows, there are 3,923 dwelling units on 890.2 acres. Densities in residential azeas east, south, and
west of Village "A" range from low (0.4 - 2 du/ac) to High (8 - 14 du/ac) use. The lower density
residential areas in the northeastern sector aze planned to blend with existing residential use in the
neighboring La Serena and Meadowview developments. (See Figure II-2, Vicinity Map.) Medium
low density sections south of Rancho California Road and north of Rancho Vista Road aze intended
to ve compatible with adjacent residential land uses. and the school uses located south of the project
~-1 site. These Planning Areas will provide a range of housing, from custom single family lots to small
~f lot single family units. The lowest densities provided in azeas along the site's eastern boundary aze
planned to buffer land uses east of Butterfield Stage Road.
Village "A" in the southwestern portion of the project site will contain 1,546 of the 3,923 dwelling
units planned on-site. The residential development in Village "A" will consist of attached and
detached units clustered azound an 18-hole golf course. The 472-acre village also will offer
recreation opportunities at the clubhouse/recreation facility. Village "A" is designed for
compatibility with the Heritage Mobilehome, Pazk now located on a "Not a Part" pazcel in the
northwestern corner of the project site.
Village "A" in MARGARITA VILLAGE will combine residential and recreation uses in a development
which is planned and operated to create a true "sense of neighborhood" in an aesthetic, socially-
orientedsetting. Lower density attached housing will be provided by eight-plex, six-plex, four-plex,
tri-plex and duplex products. Single family houses offering varied floor plans will be available as
patio home or conventional. single family detached products in all planning areas. Higher density
products will consist of multi-family products such as townhomes, condos or apartments. The
village will focus azound the golf course and facilities at the activity or recreation center.
Recreational opportunities also will be available outdoors at a swimming pool and spa. The activity
center will serve as a neighborhood educational and social hub, offering a variety of recreational
and social facilities.
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-14
Margarita Village l[l[. lE'roject~Development IE~lan
1) Maximum Units
As noted in Table II-1, Project Summary, a maximum number of dwelling units has been assigned
to each planning azea within MARGARITA VILLAGE. That number is based on a tazget density for
each planning azea. A range is given for each planning azea based "on the maximum proposed
number of dwelling units relative to the planning area's'acreage. The bomber of dwelling units
actually constructed may fluctuate but will not exceed the maximum for any given azea of the
project.
2) Housing ]Program
As shown on Figure II-3, Specific Land Use Plan, and Table II-1, Project Summary, the
MARGARITA VILLAGE proposal includes a range of residential densities and uses that will produce
a variety of housing types ranging from custom single family lots to multi-family attached units.
Residential densities aze highest near the Village Core located along the western boundary, at the
intersection of Mazgarita and Rancho California Roads. The lowest residential densities aze located
along the northern and eastern boundaries, to be compatible with adjacent-low density residential
and agricultural uses off-site.
<_,
Varied housing types in Village "B" and Village "C" will include apartments and condominiums,
patio homes, conventional single family detached and custom single family lots. Village "A" will
contain townhouses and condominiums, patio homes, detached single family units, duplexes, 4-,
6-and 8-plex structures and multi-family housing such as townhomes, condos or apartments. These ~
housing types will be distributed throughout the planning azeas, as shown in Table II-3, Housing
Types, and Figure II-3, Speci, fic Land Use Plan. A description of each housing type is given below:
a. Multi-family
Apartment units aze multi-story dwellings usually owned by one owner. Condominiums
or townhomes aze single- ormultiple-story dwelling units each owned by a separate owner,
in a multi-story building. The apartments may be rented or leased, and eventually sold as
condominiums. Both will be designed with detached common garage buildings or attached
tuck-under style gazages. .
b. Custom Lots
The minimum lot size for custom lots will be one acre. Grading will be minimized to
provide driveway access and a buildable pad azea of approximately 10,000 square feet.
Custom residential homes will be designed and built by the owner or speculation builder
on these lots.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-15
ID[. I~roject ][Development flan
TABLE II-3
HOUSING TYPES
a~ ~~ a ~,~ ~ ~' ~ e is ~ s ~ ~~~
High Townhouses and Condominiums 333 DU
Residential
(8-14 Du/AC)
Medium High Single Family Detached Homes, Patio Homes, 1,390 Du
'Residential Duplexes, 4-Plexes, 6-Plexes, and 8-Plexes
Medium Single Family Detached and Patio Homes 2,154 DU
Residential
(2-S DU/AC)
Low Custom Single Family Lots (e.g., lots ranging in 46 DU
Residential size from 10,000 sq. ft. to lazger than-one acre)
(0.4-2 Du/AC) and Single Family Detached Homes
GxAxD TOTAL 3,923 DD
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-16
Margarita Village l[I[. project llDevelopment plan
c. Single Family Detached
This category' will include traditional single family detached units on a range of lot sizes,
with,.an average'minimumiot size of 6,000 squaze feet. The smaller units on smaller lots
would be designed to appeal to first-time home buyers.
d. Patio Homes
Patio homes aze high density single family detached units will small patios(yazds. The
minimum patio home lot sizes for each Village aze as follows: Village "A," 4,000 squaze
feet; Village "B," no patio lots proposed; and Village "C," 4,500 squaze feet.
e. Duplex, 4Plex, 6-Plex and 8-Plex
Along with varying densities of single family housing, duplexes (two attached dwelling
units with a common side wall) are proposed along with 4-plexes (four attached dwelling
units), 6-plexes (six attached du) and 8-plexes (eight attached du) in Village "A." Due to
the lazge scale of the project and long Lange build-out schedule, product types and designs
discussed here are preliminary and may be subject to revisions as the project develops. The
City of Temecula Zoning Ordinance will be observed for minimum standazds relating to
signage, landscaping, pazlting, etc. Restrictions and standazds in this Specific Plan will
achieve results beyond those minimum standazds in order to achieve the desired project
image.
;j
3) Entry and Roadway hierarchy
As a part of the overall design for MARGARITA VILLAGE, an entry and roadway herazchy has been
developed as shown in Figure II-6, Entry and Roadway Hierarchy Plan.
4) Implementing Zoning
A Specific Plan (SP) Zone Ordinance was adopted simultaneously with this amendment.
5) Maintenance IDistricts and Associations
Successful operation of maintenance districts and associations is important in maintaining aesthetic
quality in the project azea. Maintenance responsibilities for common project facilities will be
divided as follows:
a. Village "A"
Village "A" may operate as aself-contained unit with controlled access. All internal
roadways may be public or private. Private roadways may be maintained by a Master
Homeowners Association. All roads will be built in accordance with City of Temecula
standazds and guidelines. All common facilities within this azea will be maintained in a
similar manner. In some areas, subassociations may be formed. p
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-17
} ~
~ Q
z Z
w w
f- f..
U U
w W
O 'p
a °C
a
¢ ~
~ O
Z
~ ~
~~
OO.
O
0
0
z~
~~
O
E- '~.
W
q ~ ~
/
~
(~
~ a
i o. M
6~
- U
~ U ~ pip
yL~l~p
^.~~
~ ~
r.
~<
ij
~~
O
O O
Margarita Village l[1[. (Project ][Development (Plan
-' b. Neighborhood Associations
In certain residential azeas of the project, smaller associations may be formed to assume
maintenance responsibility for common azeas and facilities that benefit only residents in
those azeas. Private recreation centers, common open space areas, and private roadways
exemplify facilities that will come under the jurisdiction of a neighborhood association.
c. Commercial Areas
The commercial Planning Area may have its own private association. If no association is
formed, a common maintenance chazge will be assessed to cover common azea mainte-
nance.
d. Golf Course
The golf course and lakes will be the responsibility of the golf course operator or his
assignee. A membership or use fee may be levied to partially defray the expense of
operating the golf course.
e. Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood pazks totaling approximately 37.5 acres will be located within the service
azea of the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD). The actual size of the 12.5-ac
pazk in Planning Area 44 will be detemuned when subdivision maps aze submitted for the
individual Planning azeas within Village "A". If the number of units achieved is less than
the number allowed by this Specific Plan, then the park acreage may be reduced by a
commensurate amount based on the City's pazk requirement formulas.
f. Open Space Areas
All open space azeas not directly associated with a particulaz neighborhood will be the
responsibility of either a Master Homeowner's Association, a neighborhood association,
a County Service Area (CSA), a Counry Service District (CSD), or public facilities
maintenance azea.
g. Flood Control Facilities
All flood control facilities will be designed and constructed to Riverside County Flood
Control District standazds and will be operated and maintained through either a Master
Homeowner's Association, the Flood Control District or other similar public facilities
maintenance azea. The applicant will bear all costs connected with development of flood
control facilities.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-19
Margarita Village ~. lProject )IDevelopment IPlan
h. Project Roadways
All public project roadways outside of Village "A" will be designed and constructed to
standazds acceptable to the City of Temecula and will therefore be entered into the City's
system of roads for operation and maintenance. All roadways within Village "A" will be
designed and constructed to standards shown and described in the Circulation plan of the
Mazgarita Village Specific Plan. These standazds are acceptable to the Temecula City
Engineer. At the developer's option, the roadways in Village "A" may be either publicly
or privately owned and maintained.
C. COmmerclal C0171AOnent
It is anticipated that the population of MARGAfuTA VILLAGE will be served by a retail commercial
center sited on 6.2 acres at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Pazkway. (See
Figure II-3, Specific Plan Use Plan.) Planning Area 19 (6.2 ac) contains these commercial uses
which form the center of the minor eastern Village Core. Most of the commercial uses proposed
will be convenience retail. Pedestrian walkways adjacent to roadways will extend from Village "A"
housing to the commercial site at the comer of Rancho California Road and Meadows Pazkway.
(Please see Section e., Major Collector Road and Public Facilities System.) Additional recreational
facilities will be contained within the recreation center in Village "A."
d. Onen Snace Comuonent
i
A major unifying element of the MARGARITA VILLAGE community is the Open Space and
Recreation Plan (see Figure II-7). This program incorporates many diverse elements in a
coordinated cohesive plan that interrelates with the Entry and Roadway Hierarchy Plan (see Figure
II-6), to strengthen and reinforce the strong sense of community design for MARGARTfA Vn.uGE.
1) Open Space Slopes and IDrainage
A significant portion of the project site (178.8 acres) is being retained as open space slopes and
drainage facilities. By preserving slope areas in open space, several design and planning objectives
of the Specific Plan aze met. Site planning responds to the site's natural topography. Slope azeas
provide an attractive naturalistic backdrop for MARGARITA VII.LAGE neighborhoods.
2) Golf Course and Clubhouse
A 141.0-acre golf course is planned in the center of Village "A," offering recreational opportunities
and scenic vistas for residents. A clubhouse/recreation center will be located neaz the project entry
off of Rancho California Road. This facility will serve as an activity hub for neighborhood
residents and shall include facilities such as a pool, spa, cabana, exercise facilities, kitchen facilities,
and other passive and active recreational uses.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-20
w "'
Y
O ~ ~ Q
v~ u~ Qa
CU j F- a
O
N V ~ ~
W -~ g 7
O o ~ v w
Z - ~*;~t:
W :t.~°., ~~~•..~: o
F`C';.`Y ;f ~
W ~~
v,:w;~
," ,.
i~
u
-,- \e~ le\d ~ ieJS
t~ ~ ~YX f>~ ~~~ Z~M
-~' I~ ~m-p r_. .i
\ ~a ,Yt i~`i O ~
~ :+, N 3
I4 N
~ ~-1 i _~~ L ,~~. N ,~)
~'~ ~ ~ F. ~.:.•. r.
~. V ~ ~~ ~U ~ I~~
a ~ , a >: a
~,\.~. N 0 r ~ Z
I ~ ~ 1,
O ~~ o
CC 1O v
j~ 0 0 0 ~' ~C N ~' T+{{25
i = <: .III <X.t 03 m ~ ~~.~i
o ~. ~_ ,'~,~5 1 .O.{c' o m
~w" 3 '`=`sr ~ N ° .~ ,yam r
' r d' ~ N\JJ ~ '+ i
~ ~
~•'! 1 N ^.... .1
11 = ~~ r. ~~ 1. .. ~ ~ :: Tom` .+,~
/ 6 ~ / ,,~, ~,,
m \ ~~ ~ _ .. faJ'oL~ +~M1•~,_ ~ :rig.
I ._ /
I /
I \a
i
I'
I I a
I Z
.__
Q
~`
r
Z
_U
0
~ v.:- •;R
1 ~.°-o
1
1 rl =mom
.~ ` ~ m
U~
m
In 2
O~ ~~
ro
,' i~
O
~,
o•
0
N.
a
w
Q
~
~: A
l..l~.
~ ~
W ~.
z ~
z~
~
~ a ~ ~
w
w~ ~
y
U
~ U~
~ ®'
u
.
~ -.
~ r- o
O ,
~ ~:.. ,~~ si;.:is
r
~V~°~~
~~\
~ Q
~
J:. ~cGm~n
/ '~
~\
3 ~. °m rv '1...
~ ~~ ~
I~\
\
~
~>
y ~
y
~/ ~~
~1 ) y~
6
ry~ J
C O
OGfpN ` ~ IIS'r
~ ~ v~ ~ l(3,
~,~+ `~~.
s ~ ~ ~r `x' ~.? a j
U~~~~~~,~( ~ ~ ~
_ ~-
~~~ 'i3O~~~n
l [~
Sw~ m~,
boo ` Q;
~~~~~
U 'l
~', ~~ O~ 'C~..
m~
~~_
~~
O
~~o
o<
m~
N ~N
~o
N 1
1
m0
~~-.m
wn
Y( ~l I
m =~~
~~Oo 4 .' ~
m~
o ':
~m mo
~~ 'i~~mm ~~ m
mo
.}/I-J j
G
' ~ N~ ~ V U `~ ry A,
m .:'t~ a v> m ~ n 1.
'- {{{
d"' V i z ,~leW~ Q ~
e - o
1
_.. ... - mac,
a
Margarita Village ~. project Development Flan
3) Golf Course ]Lakes
Lakes aze proposed as part of the golf course. These lakes function as major aesthetic amenities
within and adjacent to the Village Cores and act as flood control facilities as well. These lakes may
be part of the Master Drainage Plan for the site as detailed in Section I:B.2.£, of this Specific Plan.
The lakes will be supplied through the on-site irrigation system serving the golf course as a whole.
4) Neighborhood Parks
Four publicly owned and maintained parks totaling 37.5 acres are proposed within the project. The
parks will provide a variety of recreational opportunities for project residents and nearby azeas of
Rancho California. Plans for the parks in Planning Areas 5, 18, 44 and 45 are found within Section
III, Design Guidelines, of this document. These facilities will serve project residents and will be
available to the public at large.
5) Private Recreation Facilities/Common Open Space
Where attached housing types (higher densities) aze planned, private recreation facilities and
common open space will be provided as required, in addition to community and neighborhood ope
space uses described above.
Private recreation areas may include facilities such as pools, spas, cabanas, meeting rooms, fire pits,
wetbazs, and kitchen facilities.
Private common open space within each planning area will be devoted to passive open space use.
In the family-oriented neighborhoods, this may include facilities for picnicking, children's play
areas, and small lot sports such as volleyball or basketball. Exact design and layout of these
facilities will be accomplished in conjunction with detailed tract layouts.
It should be emphasized that MARGARITA VILLAGE is being planned as a single integrated
community and that community wide recreation facilities (pazk and golf course, if public) will be
available to all residents of MARGARITA VILLAGE and the Ciry of Temecula as a whole.
6) Community Recreation Facilities
To supplementthe on-site open space azeas described above, publicly-owned and maintained sports
fields will be available at the middle school planned off-site on the western portion of MARGARITA
VILLAGE (west of Margarita Road) and at the two elementary schools on-site. In addition, facilities
will be available at neighboring Temecula Valley High School and private Linfield School, also
located south of the site boundary.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-22
Margarifa Village ][][. ]Project ]!.Development ]Plan
'n Regional Facilities
A number of regional recreation facilities located off-site will be available to project residents,
including recreational activities at Lake Skinner north of the site and at Vail Lake (southeast) (see
Figure II-2, Vicinity Map). Also, there are public pazks located in Temecula. Rancho California
Sports Pazk is located on 15 acres at the southwestern comer of Rancho Vista and Mazgarita Roads.
Expansion of the sports pazk is planned to approximately 30 acres and ultimately to about 85 acres
in size. The sports pazk is located across from Temecula Valley High School, which also has
playfields and recreation facilities available to serve the local population at lazge.
A regional equestrian trail is master-planned along the MWD easement through the Margarita
Village site. This trail will be implemented as shown on Figure II-7, Open Space and Recreation
Plan. Because access to Village "A" will be controlled, the equestrian trail will parallel Meadows
Pazkway and Rancho California Road azound Village "A." A linkage to the east will also be
provided along Rancho California Road.
e. Niaior Circulation Road and Public Facilities System
1) Circulation Plan
The Master Circulation Plan (see Figure II-8) for MARGARITA VILLAGE contains roadway widths,
alignments, and access locations which aze intended to adequately service future traffic volumes
in the project area, as identified for the project site by the project traffic consultant and by the City
of Temecula. The network has been designed to accommodate existing traffic and future traffic.
At build-out, City master-planned roadways that will serve the project include:
• Rancho California Road - E/W Arterial - 110' ROW
• Margarita Road - N/S Arterial - 100' ROW
• Butterfield Stage Road - N/S Arterial - 110' ROW
• Meadows Pazkway - N/S Major - 100' ROW
• Rancho Vista Road - E/W Secondary - 88' ROW
• La Serena Way - E/W Secondary - 88' ROW
These roadways will form the major circulation network to and within the project site. Additional
collector and local roads have been designed where needed as shown on Figure II-3, Specific Land
Use Plan. The.total acreage devoted to major roads is 60.8 acres.
Cross-sections for proposed arterial, major and secondary project roadways aze shown in Figure II-
9A, Roadway Cross-Sections. Within Village "A", local roadways have been designed to be either
public or private. Special cross-sections have been designed for this purpose that aze acceptable
to the City Engineer. Options 1 and 2 for local roadways within Village "A" aze shown on Figure
II-9B, Roadway Cross-Sections. Option 2 applies only to local roadways within Planning Areas
33, 35, 36 and 37. Alignments of collector and local roadways will be determined in conjunction
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-23
o Q
~' 0
0 o O
O' Q
0
0
N
r-~
a
Q
n
2
W
Q
o
W
z~
~a ~
~
~
i a.
- U
~ !~
V
w ~
~ U
~
~ ~ ~~
LL !! ,,
:V
:~
V
12' _ I 36' I 14' ~ 36' 12'
110'
ARTERIAL O~IGHUVAY
10' i 34' I 12'
34'
10'
10
MAJOR ROAD
_p~
Ll v ~a
10' I 68 I 10
II- 8 8'
SECONDARY ROAD
ALL LOCAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS WILL BE FIGURE II-9A
BUILT ACCORDING TO CITY OF TEMECULA
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES OUTLINED IN
THE SPECIFIC PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. y~-.{~, ~/p~~ `~/,
pptl^^4 ®~ ~ tl tl ~ Ypp~~ n^ 'p` ~ C
V~®~~ SECTI®1 tlEl
\ ~~r~~>~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
V
II-25
..xz?4
7' 36' 7'
50'
VILLAGE "A" LOCAL STREET
(OPTION 1)
1, 36 4.5'
41.5'
VILLAGE "A" LOCAL STREET
(OPTION 2 -Applies to local streets within Planning Areas 33, 35, 36 and 37)
FIGURE II-9B
Q
-~q
~a ~~
®/`'~®HccNf'ct T c
~~~~V SECT~Oi~S
am., n,am
~~'~ ~c~1p~c~ll~Il{~c~1 ~IlIlIl~~c~
mom.m ravw~sw
II-26
Margarita Village ~. (Project l~Development ]flan
with future detailed planning and phasing of the project. All roads will be-built according to
standards and guidelines acceptable to the Temecula City Engineer as outlined in the Specific Plan.
Off-Site Mitigations
Due to the development of MARGARITA VILLAGE, as well as other surrounding projects, roadway
improvements of off-site roadways aze required in order to maintain an efficient roadway system.
Off-site roadway improvements are shown in Figure II-10. The following is a brief listing of these
off-site improvements:
Wideting of Rancho California Road from Mazgarita Road to Interstate 15.
Signalization of the following intersections:
Rancho California Road at Ynez Road
• Rancho California Road at Margarita Road
• Rancho California Road at Meadows Pazkway
• Santiago Road at Mazgarita Road
• Mazgarita Road at State Route 79
• Meadows Pazkway at State Route 79
O ~ Widening of State Route 79 from Meadows Pazkway to Pala Road.
n Four-way stop controls at the following intersections:
• Margarita Road at Rancho Vista Road
• Mazgarita Road at Pauba Road
• Mazgarita Road at de Portola Road
• Meadows Pazkway at Rancho Vista Road
• Meadows Pazkway at de Portola Road
Rancho California Road and Butterfield Stage Road
• Pauba Road at Butterfield Stage Road
Construction of ramp intersection improvements at Interstate 15 and State Route 79
The above off-site mitigation program assumes concurrent development of both MARGARrrA
VILLAGE and Vail Meadows, as well as additional traffic increases due to adjacent development.
For additional details on off-site mitigations and phasing of improvements, please refer to the
following reports:
® Margarita Village Specific Plan Amendment Traffic Impact Study, January 1988 by Wilber
Smith & Associates.
® Margarita Village Traffic Impact Study, July 1985 by Wilbur Smith & Associates.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-27
U'
O
w
w a ~
F 2 ~ I- ~ F-
~ cn o -> Z ~
~ Q U ~'~ ~~
w ~a a
w 3 y ao 0
z ~ oc w~ ~~ ~~.
~ ~ z ~ ?~ ~.o >o
~ .,
'~- ' ~
w
w
~~
00
~~
a
~ J
. _
>_
~o
>.x
Y U
aZ
~~
~>
z.m ~
~~O w
aUa
W o.
WJW
~ LL ~
z?`~
~,
Qa~ ~
C9J
p~
~~p °"'
l~A--J
~'~
~~
~~
~®
W ~~
`~ ® ~
A
V
ti
ti
O~ O 0
O
o xv
.d
Margarita Village ~. lProject Development IPlan
Golf Carts
Pursuant to Section 21115 of the California Vehicle Code, the City has designated Village "A" of
the Margarita Village Specific Plan as a "real estate development offering golf facilities." The City,
therefore designates the roadways within Village "A" for combined use of motor vehicles and golf
carts provided that the Develop shall post signs to that effect along the streets within Village "A".
Figure I-10A, Golf Can Crossings, identifies the location and the typical design of golf cart
crossings within Village "A".
2) ]Public ]Facilities
Master planning for the project has considered all public utility and infrastructure needs associated
with the proposed development. These will be installed on a phased bases as a logical and orderly
extension of area-wide master-planned facilities.
a. Master Water Plan
The Rancho California Water District provides water service in the project azea and has
confirmed its ability to serve the proposed project. Figure II-11, Master Water Plan, shows
the locations of existing and proposed 12", 16", 20", and 24" PVC water mains (including
realigned facilities). Alignments shown are conceptual and may be adjusted at more
detailed planning stages.
b. Master Sewer Plan
The site is within the jurisdiction of Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) for sewer
service. Some lines already exist in the project area, and the agency has indicated an ability
to extend full service to the project site. Only existing and proposed 8", 12", and 15" VCP
trunk sewers (mains) aze shown on Figure II-12, Master Sewer Plan, sized to meet
EMWD's standazds and Master Plan requirements. The lines are therefore lazger than
necessary to serve the proposed project alone. Alignments shown aze conceptual and may
be adjusted at more detailed site planning stages. The Rancho California Water District
(RCWD) would be the purveyor of reclaimed water for use on the project site. A reclaimed
water main is extended onsite within a local access road south of La Serena Way in the
northwest portion of the site. The project applicant and engineer aze considering using
reclaimed water for irrigating the golf course and landscaping along major roads. In
addition, the lakes on the golf course may be filled using reclaimed water from EMWD and
RCWD plants. (No reclaimed water would be used in the public pazk azeas.)
c. Fire Protection
The County of Riverside Fire Departrnent and California Department of Forestry provide
services to the project azea. Afire station is located just west of I-15 in Temecula (see
Figure I-2, Site Location Map). This enables conformance with the General Plan
requirement that urban land uses be reached within five minutes from a local station.
Future fire protection faculties aze planned in Temecula
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-29
Y
N
a~
~I''
O ~
~/
M1
^
W~ Z (rl
-^ll
k(
LL O ~~
~~
U
Q
J
~ ~
d>
cU
a
Z
~ ~
K~
¢~
U?
J Qg'
BU'S
W
U
Q LL
¢YW
¢F
Z
m W
d1 W
U~
Y
J
O
U
F
W
- z
~ J
a r,
N
K X
m N
a
O ~
w z
F ~
a
(V Q
l~~
~~ //~~
VJ
U
w
W
X
~~~~~
00000
M M O
N
N
V
2
a
22=52 ~
aaaaa ¢
~~~~~ V
NONOU7 LL
Nth (h7 V' J
2
U'
C7
Z
O
U
H
¢
U
LL
J
LJ IJ
IJ
~~
~~~
~O
O Q%D
"'A;
~~
o~
0
N
~~
~ Y .W'
W Z
2 Q J
J H '.~: [~
W
w w a z° L~1
~ 3 0. z
U' C7 W J
z z o n-
~ ~ a z Z
O. O
0 W W ,. ~- W - 4 Ede
Z n f- z
W ~ Z i a
J O o N ~
~ ~ W
~ G.
~'~
vsv
~r~
,-.
C7
z
w
w
z
C7
z
w
Y
U
2
IL
U
7
O
y
W Z
Z J
J ~
W
W
w v?
~ ~
O '~
r
~ F-
r
s z
~ o o.
~ w
? ~ ~O
ai ~ °"
X LL ~
~ w ~ a
W
O
~.,. ~~
;.'
f
i'i
C ro
G [V ~
~ -~
o
0
N
°z ~
z
(~
~~
T 0. Y
- U_
W [y
-"
~ U
w
~ W
u.. ~
~''~\' ..
'>...
H
F~4
O
O
B~
>~
0
v¢v
Z_
W
W
Z
Z
W
Y
U
Q
ui
v
O
N
Margarifa Village ~~. project Development flan
d. Schools
Two elementary schools aze proposed on the project site on La Serena Way (Planning Area
1) and south of Rancho Vista Road in Planning Area 18. A site has also been reserved fro
use as a middle school west of Mazgarita Road. These schools will serve MARGARITA
VILLAGE and surrounding residential azeas, as well. The middle school will tie in with the
village core along Mazgarita Road, which includes Temecula Valley High School and
private Linfield school.
The project applicant intends to cooperate with the local Temecula Elementary and Elsinore
High School Districts to pay appropriate fees, where required. The amount, timing and
method of paying any fees will be subject to mutually agreed-upon terms. The school
district(s) will determine the method of conveyance, timing and use of district school sites,
based on overall district facilities planning.
3) t'hasing Component
The 3,923 dwelling unit MARGARITA VII.LAGE project will be phased over aseven-yeaz period, in
response to market demands, according to a logical and orderly extension of roadways, public
utilities, and infrastructure on- and off-site (within the first seven yeazs), as well as an assumed rate
of mazket absorption.
The proposed Phasing Plan is illustrated in Figure II-13, Phasing Plan, showing coordinated
development of all Planning Areas, flood control facilities, roads and infrastructure. Tables II-4
through II-7 provide phase by phase summaries of uses, densities, acres and dwelling units.
Phases may overlap, based on changing economic and mazket trends. However, major public
facility and infrastructure construction will be completed for each phase according to development
requirements. It is anticipated that phasing of the commercial azea (Planning Area 19) will
generally follow residential use, in response to mazket demand.
2. ]Project-amide ][Design and textual ][Development standards
a. Land l,Jse Plan Standards
•: The total Specific Plan shall be developed with a maximum of 3,923 dwelling units on
1,396.1 acres, pursuant to Figure II-13, Specific Land Use Plan.
d• Final development densities for each phase shown in Figure II-13, Phasing Plan, shall
be determined through the appropriate tract application, up to the maximum density
identified for the planning azea in question as shown on Table II-2 based upon, but not
limited to the following:
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-33
•w
a
x
a
r
z
w
a
O
W
W
~ LI o
o
W °
J
' .._1 t , ,
I
~'~~~
i
~~ ~
~, f ~~ ~ ~ _ ~. ~.
. > ...,.
a
~ J `~ ~ ~ M ~~ ~ -o-
f~ mC /, y~y~ M ~ m ~ ~~
f ~ m~ ~~~ - ~ ~~ ~ ~ ' °
W ,'
O ~ ~.
9 3 _"~~
/ri ,.. ~00 ~~ b Y
N ~ ~~ 6
Z
N O i~ - 1y~`}d ~ ~ W
m b O ~ f Sri' OO ~-4 .r- '_'~~ O~ ~ ~ 'i ~ 1•-~Tj~
`7 ° ,~ ~
r-mot ~ z
• . ~ ~~e?~ Y ~ ~N ~~ ~ ~.. ~ , 1j
/ CJ.J Nom.
Qgo3 N / ~ Y
_ .. ~ ~ `..
O ~
U ~ e,;
p ~ ( ~' ~ Sc U N I, ~ ,~ ~ ~
O5 ~ ,= N p ~ S, v I. I j ~ o ~//f~) 4
// m ~
dC y
m ~ w~\ ~]
• ciD. ~ ~i~` mo
- ~ ~ S . ,. s~ ai N
. .,~_ ° d~\ rat ~~ .n
~o
uc-
l~ ~~ 1,~ I~,1; 3 r,ti;,r.,,~.
m
,.
' ~ ~' )
fro ci v~
~y~Vi) c~
u
a m // / i
Q ~ ~ m~-, I I F ,' j'
~ ~~,!~ k _' '' ,,~~, ~;~~~
z ~ ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~o ~ r
U~ s
V ~Y / l V ~~ M d =? m CC m ' ~'y~
~ m :B ~ N M~ e>~
~ 1J Oo 3ra =b ~ct57> .1 ~..
+ N a
`~ ~ z
'J,Y .
~~
iy~~
o ~~~~ o
a
0
~Ny]
,R G
R.
d F
o~ G
~ c
Ca ~ o
Q
co ~
1 Pr
_U
w~Q C
~ U
~~[~ G
~~ ..
~ ~,
U ~
~n
'~~Gm.n
y o ~n
U=`
IOcG"'c~
m
;: ~m
~l
°
~m
~~-. jX
~ ~ ~ /..1
H
II '
~~~
vcv
• c~
0
1Vlargarita Village ~. project development flan
• adequate availability of services;
• adequate access and circulation;
• sensitivity to landforms;
• innovation in housing types, design, conservation, or opportunities;
• adequate provision of recreational open space;
sensitivity to neighborhood design through appropriate lot and street layouts; and
• compatibility with surrounding off-site development land uses and densities.
•3 Lots created pursuant to this Specific Plan shall be in conformance with the iievelop-
ment standazds of the Specific Plan (SP) Zone Ordinance accompanying this document.
• Flag lots shall not be permitted except as approved by the Planning Director
:• All utilities shall be placed underground.
• All landscaped common aeeas and the public pazks within the Specific Plan shall
include automatic irrigation systems.
• Prior to the recordation of any final subdivision, improvement plans for the developed
public pazk or landscaped aeeas for the subdivision, or plans to mitigate an environmental
impact for that stage of development, shall be submitted to the Planning Commission for
approval. The imp;ovement plans shall include, but not be limited to the following:
• Final grading plan.
• A landscaping plan with seed mixes formulching and staking methods; locations,
type, size and quantity of plantings.
• A hardscaping plan with location, type and quantity of recreational amenities/
facilities.
:• At the time of recordation of any tentative subdivision which contains a common
greenbelt, pazk and/or lineaz pazk aeeas, the subdivision shall have those common areas
conveyed to the master property owners association or appropriate public maintenance
agency.
:• The Director of Community Development may approve minor variations from the
standazds and design guidelines of the Specific Plan without requiring an amendment to the
Specific Plan.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-35
Margarita Village ID[. 1Project jDevelopment (Plan
TABLE II-4
PHASE I SUMMARY
~°~T ~+'a~.4.~
~~;, 3 c
s~ ,.~ ~~~~~ ~.~ n^,ro~Yrv~ yyszr~,-'
_ h' *~4a ~,AND`USE~ 8 ~,,t„ '
,«7 ~ ~.° ,~~~ ~ 9LakR .c
~ CREAGE ~
~' ~alevi ~i`~k~B`x.'ttj"~r~,
`XIMUM~
~D4YF.F~BV,GUNI25.
26. Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac} 23.5 AC ~ 105 DU
27 Medium Residential (2-5 `du/ac) 8.1 AC 36 Du
29 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 33.8 AC 136 DU
30 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 33.4 AC 173 Du
32 High Residential (8-14 du/ac), 14.4 AC 158 DU
35 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 66.1 AC 356 Du
36 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 7.5 AC 62 Du
37 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 23.7 AC 107 DU
42 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 15.2 AC 85 Du
SUBTOTAL. 225.7 AC 1,218 DU
OTHER LAND DSES
--- Golf Course/Clubhouse/Recreation
Center 141.0 AC ---
28 School Administration 11.0AC --
31 Church 53 AC ---
32A Post Office 5.0 AC ---
TOTALS 388.0 AC 1,218 Du
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-36
Vi
]I][. lProject IIDevelopment (Plan
TABLE II-5
PHASE II SUMMARY
~
~AREASr ~
4 :' ~~ ~. `.~1DLj~ s~+€~ ~,`,°^ ~
;,~ ~ EN3I1=Y ~' ~-~
Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) ~AG~EAI~E ~
~; ..yam
11.0 AC c ~MAXIl~iLTM~
'DWEiP:Il~G~UN~T5
51 DU
6 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 26.5 AC 106 DU
10/11/12 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 52.8 AC 215 Du
20 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 12.1 AC 54 DU
21 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 10.3 AC 62 Du
22 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 10.9 AC 40 DU
23 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 10.2 AC 46 DU
24 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 16.9 AC 91 DU
25 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 10.9 AC 40 DU
33 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 16.0 AC 82 DU
34 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 14.7 Ac 100 DU
SUBTOTAL 192.3 AC 887 DU
OTHER LAND USES
45 Pazk 9.2 AC ---
TOTALS 201.5 Ac 887 Du
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-37
][1[. ]Project lI-evelopment ]Plan
TABLE II-6
PHASE III SUMMARY
6 ~~ ~
Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) tYCREAGfE ~
26.5 AC ~~4_ 1~etX3M `
106 Du
8 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 21.0 AC 76 Du
13 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 47.4 AC 109 Du
14 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 38.1 AC ~ 175 Du
38 Medium High Residential (5=8 du/ac) 29.3 AC 181 Du
40 Medium High Residential (5-8 du/ac) 40.1 AC 198 Du
SUBTOTAL 202.4 AC 845 DU
OTHER LAND USES
5 Park 11.5 AC ---
TOTALS 213.9 AC 845 DU
C~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-38
Margarita Village l[l[. ]Project ][Development (Plan
Q
TABLE II-7
PHASE IV SUMMARY
'~ ~O ~~
rAREASV ~' K ~yh 6 ~ ~ ~#
~',- ~ J(~~i,VD~IISE ~
rC ~ ~~ P'4
_. . _zDENSITY <.- _ ~ ... ~RiY~c
A EA E ~
4. to Y
~_ ~ ..
`~~a'a°
4 ....
VR`ELI.INGiU a
2 Low Residential (0.4-2 du/ac) 13.0 AC 27 DU
3 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 2.2 pC 6 DU
7 Low Residential (0.4-2 du/ac) 12.0 AC 12 DU
9 Low Residential (0.4-2 du/ac) 10.0 AC 7 Du
15 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 80.9 Ac 255 DU
16' Medium Residen6al(2-5 du/ac) 59.5 AC 183 DU
17 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 34.4 AC 108 DU
42 High Residential (8-12 du/ac) 14.6 AC 175 DU
44 Medium Residential (2-5 du/ac) 43.2 AC 200 DU
SUBTOTAL 269.8 AC 973 DU
OTHER LAND USES
1 Elementary School 13.0 AC ---
19 Commercial 6.2 AC ---
18 Elementary School/Park 14.3 AC ---
44 Park 12.5 ---
TOTALS 315.8 Ac 973 DU
Specific Plan No. 199CAmendment No. 2 Page II-39
Margarita Village ~. (Project lLDevelopment ll~llan
b. Open Space and Recreational Standards
• Development shall conform to the areas identified on the Conceptual Grading Plan
(Figure II-14) which provides for major slope azeas and certain major drainage courses in
the golf course as common open space.
• Planning areas will be separated and distinguished by prominent slopes reflecting the
original natural terrain.
:• Where feasible, vegetation and natural slope azeas will be preserved.
:• The neighborhood pazks will be publicly owned and maintained. The golf course will
be privately owned and maintained. Public open space/recreation areas on the site will be
developed per appropriate zoning requirements and operated to maintain public access to
recreation facilities.
• A master property owners association or some type of benefit assessment district will
be established to operate and maintain all open space and recreation facilities. The
neighborhood recreation center in Village "A" and other recreation centers in higher density
areas may also require homeowners associations.
• An equestrian trail shall be established along the alignment shown on Figure II-7, Open
Space and Recreation Plan. This trail shall be developed to the City's General Plan
standazd for primary riding and hiking trails.
c. Circulation Standards
:• The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations shown on
figures II-9A and II-9B, Roadway Cross-Sections, of the Specific Plan as approved by the
City of Temecula Public Works Departrnent.
:• The Master Circulation Plan with project Traffic Analysis (see Section IV, Technical
Appendices) will serve as the composite circulation plan for MARGARITA Vn.t.ncE. All
roadway improvements will be phased in accordance with this plan.
• Specific roads will be constructed as local streets, collectors, major streets and arterial
(urban arterial) streets/ltighways according to the standazds of the City of Temecula except
as follows:
1. In Village "A", the minimum centerline radius shall be 150 feet on entry streets and
cul-de-sac streets. The minimum centerline radius for local streets on all other
portion of Village "A" that have been graded shall be 200 feet. All other local
streets within Village "A" shall have a minimum centerline radius of 250 feet.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-40
o
z ~~
o ~ ~ c~
n ~ ~ °~
>.
W
~ ~.
z ~, a ~
~ ~ W ~~ ~3
W '~ ® ~
LL
J ~ ~~
` ~ ~ ~ ~,1 ~`o.
" J1 '' 00'0'111 ~, .. I ~ 1
I ~.'Jn F Yr ~~1 y( .. ~~ ~\....~'
~~yo' /. `1 ~~~~~ as ~. t j~..l I II ~ ~ ~ .r ~ ~ 1 ~ • n
/, ~ ~r ,
i.- , ~~ i
~:
2 I 7~,• ~( I -~~
JI ~~ ~~ - y~~: ~/41! r ~ .~r~ li l I'~ I V~ .-} / l~(l` ~ Ir ~• ~~ I~ ~a. ~11
`~•~'.,, '.Y • ! ' Y 1. I/` JII} 1 I •,r\ 1 r'SE l ~ 11~ 1 i ~'1 Y~1• T., 11 J ` Pi~~.. it ~.. ~ . ~ F 1;.:1
, . ,// 11 --rl it
1 r W ~ ~I~ Ir;:.
\1 ~ ~~~~'\-/~ ~ 1 P \ .:j' 1\ ,1~ J Ifs ~ IL ~fl~ 1 ~ 1
1 .1~ P ~lI _ }1 ( ~. / III A~:VI Iliil / t ~ r IAII~Ye 7~~~ II •1:
.. ~ 1 i {t I' / ~f' .~ ° 1' / tJ \ /I~ r d t ~i~ / r ~~ ~ 411 /~/ / ;/( ~'..
~`~ h P t ./ ~ r I ~~1 1 ~„ ,1
nail I 1 .. \ .f r_ i' ~ I r t t 1 \
~ r ~ I ~ ~ '~ J H' I IJl i 1 { JvJI ~~. ~ \ . i} l
~'.A _ { w l 1,'~~' ` ~t'~ '~Y ~ r ed '>~~k.i~ I ~iL...~ \ 11 ~ ~ I~l 11 1/~ {, ~~..
:`; .:y"-~+Y's ~ ~ 1 4 ~'- ~'vr~. > ~ } \ i ~• I - V 11'1', , jl.•: I.C(~P. ?r 61.E ~e... R' :• ! /,^;
•1`i ~ ~ 1\erJ~ f„ ltl d I ~\ r ~ i ' / J /RI JI I e } ~ VIII ~yy 11 .'\ ~ r~,~ •~+v~-/~i~
r~ ~ fl~ ¢ {.7r ,~.• ~:! ~ 1 . {(r ~,/,-P ,\ L_-''~„ ~\ .II ~/,, / r 1 i '' ~ 11~ ~ 11f :,I:
+ ~.. ~ 1. I
l~ jpV ~ J r ~'~ ".% ~ n 1 I ~ sir / / ~ ;- /~Yf A ! - , ~ ~ (~ ~~
JI! ~ a ,1"\ 1 ~~r +~ .. ,,~ M1 I r ~ lrra I ° ~ \ it
~` \ /. ,~iv ~ JI/ I ~l~~~l p T.' ..t R7 ..I~~x +I ~n ,~ \ 't)',~~ •I `)a t• ~~ V
l 1 a° , ~ '~f r 1'. I l ~r ;\iT~~ -•\ ~u ~~r ~ 1.. .:. I I~
.. ~, •
7r"bt 1 ! t ~ ~~ a~_ ! i ~,1: I ~ / ~ r '.:.I i 1 \ f y, r 1 I~ ~ r 1 ~ ~,I~ ..
>~ I I t
A.~ /fir `Li\ ;'. Y 1, ~ ~r ~ ' I "II L j ':~ ~1 r,~ it ,I' ~..
~ 1~ r ~' / i<v~ - v. ~11\'~ 1~1 '.`.~ i `Ill r.~l ~i -, Jn' as
~~ P \ / rr l .'~ ~'~/r•~ / 1~ ~ (j` 1 ~ r. ` _S•I~~ I r 1 r 1 \~f( = ~ •a111
I~`' ~Y ~ 1 11. ~ I rtll (r l ~ ' QI
....~`~•..., it ~ I IV~. Y\ ~4! v ~} T Ij d,~l ~ I A I~ J 1' ~r ~ I1 ~ 'r ~, i~ ~ aott _
I r ! i
~ ~_~~ ~.. III ~~1 1~ 1 \ I 1~~~ {w..1 t,.~ ~ ~~; I .~ I ~ ~r~ r-' , '/~
.N _ 1( \\\\~~~ J.'P. ~J t 1 lll~i 's ~^•l I II ~ ~. ~r oiLl
~r7~ ~~`~r~ 1 ~ ~~~.',~. I +', rtw r r ~ s 1 i' ~ l !;4c1
'; ~[
y ',J ~ '1. l •`. (7p'~ ~~l ~~') I ~ /J ;•~li III~~II EStI
ti i ~-,. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ,t~l, , , .
~1('~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~~ ~r y ~,.~1y .• (\~, C IPA., 1 ~ ~ .I I'I\ \ I\\1 .~ / l OtM1\
. :'` ~: ~ `~ I ~1 ~ r.,~ Y~.~ 1'I~ ; ~ ! Y~' . \fNI~\J ~ ., ~1 \}:r.x.: r ~:. - anM1l
II S J 1 ~ 1 ,~~ .
\\ ()) \ ~ "~ ~ ~ I _ fy ~I, \ ~r.) u f ~I! ~!~ ~'~ J :.~ ~~ 'ul~l ,~~\\:\ el¢I
d,+.
~, ~~r J ; ~ ; :~ ~~ v~ : it ,"~ ~~ ; ~ ,~, I ~R ~ ~ .
,r ~, . ~ / n
k // r l 11'11 L ~ ','~/% ~, Ir 1 ~ ~... f' ~, r ~\ ,°~II
6 ~,/ I \. '~ )$~$)II J~,l` I a ~ ! \~ f ."~ + ' 111 > ~ '^ ~ HV+ II I tN~~ -
• t~l }`?lJ `IsM1ll ) ~ rr Lyj~ r~..~~ •~ ~ r J : ! ~\ / `i ~ Q ~ ~ /~
\ 'l,Jj t~ 't I 1 ~ :rtlN° ,'.1 K JI 1' i Ir \ ~\~\. I, •:~ I 1 I 4 i' ,. ~
i ~ >/ 1} --. a-Rz'a ; ~\ 1: I ~ ~~ '.- ~ ,Y~~ ly'/~I ~ eh . '. l ~ f _~ . ti
„ I
~ ~. `ago
` ,~, ,.. ~~ , f, ~. N
f4 ~ .' e~
' ~riii''jV !q
\ /fir "^ 1
..: ~ .... ..' ...s`
Margarita Village l[l[. ]Project Ilhevelopment llDlan
2. In azeas where constraints exist due to MWD Aqueducts, existing grading and golf
course construction ,street grades may exceed 10% but shall not exceed 15%. In
areas where such constraints do not exist, street grades shall comply with City
standazds.
3. The minimum converging angle of streets going into a knuckle shall be determined
by the required turning radius for emergency vehicles, as prescribed in the Highway
Design Manual.
4. The maximum grade on Temeku Drive through an intersecting street shall not
exceed 11%.
:• Where driveways aze a the minimum front yazd setback. length of ten (10) feet,
particulazly on cul-de-sacs where parking is already limited, the developer shall notify the
home buyer in a Disclosure Statement that some lots in the subdivision may not have a
sufficient setback from the street for parking or other purposes. The Statement shall include
notification that vehicles or other private property may not at any time block sidewalks or
obstruct the publicright-of-way. The developer shall submit a draft Statement for review
and approval by the Planning Manager. The developer shall submit signed Statements to
the Planning Departrnent prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for affected lots.
:• Signal and stop sign traffic control locations should be identified.
• Access points should be identified.
d. Phasing- Standards
:• The phasing plan demonstrates the order in which development will occur throughout
the project. (See Figure II-13, Phasing Plan.) Development may occur concurrently
between phases as approved by the local agency.
• Prior to the first tentative subdivision approval in each phase, the applicant shall provide
evidence to the Planning Department of substantial progress towards completion of
mitigation measures outlined for the development phase in question.
•'r Prior to the first tentative approval of any development or subdivision in each Phase,
the applicant shall submit roadway landscaping plans as required by the Planning
Department. The plans shall identify landscaping. Irrigation, grading and fence treatments
for reverse-frontage, back-up, buffer zone and streetscape purposes.
:• Each master phase may be subdivided into subphases for the purpose of subdivision
mapping. Any subdivision map may be further subdivided at the time final maps are
^ _ prepared in order that those final maps can be phased
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-42
Margarita Village ~. IProject Development ]Plan
• Each phase will include development of each planning azea and related development
components within that phase, including common open space areas and infrastructure.
• Phase I shall be developed with a maximum of 1,218 units.
• Phase II shall be developed with a maximum of 887 units.
• Phase III shall be developed with a maximum of 845 units.
• Phase IV shall be developed with a maximum of 973 units.
• The total number of units in MARGARTI'A VILLAGE will not exceed 3,923 dwelling units.
• All phases shall be developed in the manner described in these Phasing Guidelines.
1) -Phase I
Phase I includes development in the western half of the project site, including development
of the following:
• Residential Planning Areas 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 35, 36, 37 and 41
See densities on Table II-4, Phase I Summary
Golf Course/Clubhouse/Recreation Center
School Administration Headquarters ~
• Church
• Improvement and landscaping of western portion of Rancho California and Rancho
Vista Roads, to provide access to the planning areas listed above.
• Construction of and landscaping for any collector and local streets that access interior
planning azeas,
•'r Realignment of existing water lines in the western portion of South General Kearny
Road and La Serena Way, and installation of proposed 24" water line in the western half
of Rancho California Road.
• Installation of proposed gravity flow sewer lines in Rancho California and Rancho Vista
Roads; through the center of the golf course; along the western extension of South General
Kearny Road; and the installation of proposed force main in the northern section of
Margarita Road (at its intersection with La Serena Way).
• Construction of any additional water and sewer lines needed for the phase.
•~ Provision of a drainage system, including storm drains in the northern and southern
sections of the golf course (including roadway storm drain crossings.)
J
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-43
Margarita Village ][l[. ]Project development Flan
• Provision of all flood controUdesilting basins and drainage easements that aze part of
the golf course.
•:* Installation of any additional gas, electricity and telephone lines in Mazgarita and
Rancho California Roads and existing company easements, to serve all planning azeas in
the phase.
• Provision of interior open space and recreation areas in higher density neighborhoods.
2) Phase II
Phase II includes development in the central and eastern portions of the project site,
including:
•8 Development of:
• Residential Planning Areas 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 2Q 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 33 and 34
• See densities on Table II-5, Phase 17 Summary
• Park, Planning Area 45
• Improvement and landscaping of those portions of project roads and interior planning
azea streets that aze required to meet the needs of Phase II.
•S Construction of and landscaping for any collector or local streets that access interior
planning azeas.
• Provision of proposed gravity flow sewer lines as necessary to serve Phase II.
• Construction of any additional and sewer lines needed for the phase.
• Provision of additional elements of the drainage system, including storm drains in La
Serena Way, South General Kearny and the eastern segment of Rancho California Road.
B• Installation of any additional gas, electricity and telephone lines in major routes and
existing utility company easements.
• Provision of interior open space and recreation azeas in higher density neighborhoods.
3) Phase III
Phase III includes development in the central and eastern portions of the project site,
including:
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-44
Margarifa Village I[lI. I~roject development IlPllan
• Development of:
Residential Planning Areas 6, 8, 13, 14, 38 and 40
• Park, Planning Area 5
See densities on Table II-6, Phase III Summary
• Construction of and landscaping for any collector and local streets that access interior
planning azeas..
4* Provision of any additional water and sewer lines and drainage control features need for
the phase.
• Installation of any further gas, electricity and telephone lines to serve all planning areas.
• Provision of interior open space and recreation azeas in higher density neighborhoods.
4) Phase IV
Phase PJ includes development in the northeastern and southeastern corners of the site,
including: ~
• Development of:
• Residential Planning Areas 2, 3, 7, 9, I5, 16, 17, 42 and 43
See densities shown on Table II-7, Phase N Summary
Commercial use in Planning Area 19
• Elementary School, Planning Area 1
• Elementary School and Park, Planning Area 18
• Pazk, Planning Area 544
•? Provision of interior open space and recreation areas in higher density neighborhoods.
• Construction of and landscaping for any collector and local streets that access interior
planning azeas.
• Provision of any additional water and sewer lines and drainage control features needed
for the phase.
:• Installation of any further gas, electricity and telephone lines to serve all planning azeas.
:• Provision of interior open space and recreation azeas in higher density neighborhoods.
O
7
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-45
Margarita Village ~. lProject development IPlan
e. Conceptual Graving ]Plan
Grading for MARGARTtA VILLAGE is tailored to the existing topography of the site (see Figure II-14,
Conceptual Grading Plan). It is intended that the proposed plan be sensitive to and reflect original
natural landforms where possible, so that different residential neighborhood enclaves are
distinguished and sepazated by topographic features.
Portions of the site that aze flat or gently sloping will require minimal cut and fill operations.
Earthwork quantities will be balanced in logical azeas on-site, so that no imported dirt will be
required. The most extensive cut operations would involve excavation for the lakes and the
proposed flood controUdesilting basins and drainage easements, to implement Riverside County
Flood Control District drainage requirements for the site. The excavated material will be
distributed primarily in adjacent flat areas. This will sufficiently elevate residential azeas to allo
surface drainage to flow generally towazd the flood control facility and the lakes. Generally, a few
feet of topographic relief will be sufficient for these purposes.
Specific standards include:
® All grading activities shall be in substantial conformance with the overall grading concept
as illustrated on Figure II-14, Conceptual Grading Plan.
® All streets shall have a gradient not exceeding 15 percent.
® Slopes in excess of five feet in height shall be hydromulched.
® Slopes in excess of ten feet in height shall be landscaped in conformance with the standards
shown in Section III, Design Guidelines, of this Specific Plan.
® Prior to initial grading activities, a soils report and geotechnical study shall be performed
that further analyze on-site soil conditions and include appropriate measures to control
erosion and dust.
® Detailed grading plans shall be prepazed prior to any on-site grading for each project or
group of projects.
® Where cut and fill slopes aze created higher than ten (10) feet, detailed landscaping and
irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department when grading plans are
submitted for approval. The plans shall be reviewed for type and density of ground cover,
shrubs and trees.
® The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all planting and irrigation
systems until those operations aze the responsibility of other parties.
® Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural, rounded
terrain, where possible.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-46
Margarita Village ~. ]Project )(Development IPIan
^O Graded slopes shall be oriented to minimize visual impacts to surrounding azeas.
l~ The overall shape, height and grade of any cut and fill slope shall be developed in concert
with the existing natural contours and scale of the natural terrain of a particular site.
® The toes and tops of all slopes higher than ten (10) feet shall be rounded with curves with
radu designed in proportion to the total height of the slope, where drainage and stability
permit such rounding.
® Brow ditches, terrace drains and other minor swales shall be lined with natural erosion
control materials or concrete.
® Grading work shall be balanced on-site wherever possible.
® Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained weed-free and planted with interim
landscaping.
® Prior to any development within any area of the Specific Plan, an overall conceptual
grading plan for the portion in process shall be submitted -for Planning Department
approval. The grading plan for each such azea shall be used as a guideline for subsequent
detailed grading plans for individual stages of development within that area, and shall
include techniques utilized. to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the
grading process; approximate time frames for grading; and identification of areas which
may be graded during higher probability rain months (January through March); and
preliminary pad and roadway elevations.
® Grading shall not be permitted prior to approval of grading permits for the development
area in question.
® All cut and fill slopes shall be constructed at inclinations of.no steeper than two (2)
horizontal to one (1) vertical. The grading plan will reflect a contouring and landscaping
program intended to control erosion, slope instability and loss of aesthetic resources.
f. COIICeptllal Dr81n8Ee Plan
The site is under the jurisdiction of the Riverside County Flood Control District (RCFCD), but is
not included in any District master drainage plan. However, the applicant has developed a Master
Drainage Plan (see Figure II-15, Master Drainage Plan, for the site, designed to protect it from 100-
yeazflood potential existing in certain sections. Portions of the golf course and lakes, 9.3 acres of
flood control/desilting basins and 8.4 acres of drainage easements will all be designed to meet
RCFCD standards, even though the site is not within the district master plan.
1
As noted in Figure II-15, site runoff will be accommodated through a system of storm drains located
in key roads, in prime residential azeas, and encircling the centralized golf course. Lakes proposed
on the project golf course may be integrated into the golf courses itself as a flood control facility. r
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-47
Margarita Village ~. lProject development II~llan
In this case, the lakes would be designed to handle high flow situations. Low flows would be
diverted away from the lakes using a low flow drain system azound the lake edges. Typical project
azea urban runoff would be collected in the ]ow flow drain system so that nuisance and irrigation
run-off from developed azeas would not run dtrecUy into the lakes.
Run-off from natural hillsides along the southern portion of the site and storm flows through
developed portions will be conveyed along project roadways where possible. A subsurface system
will be utilized where necessary to safely accommodate run-off according to Riverside County
Hood Control District standazds. All other flood controUdrainage facilities will be designed and
implemented according to these standazds. Additional methods of drainage control will be
evaluated by the project applicant and engineer at later states of project design. Specific flood
control structures or greenbelt swales will be proposed in certain azeas in conjunction with future
plans.
It is anticipated that drainage/flood control facilities will be maintained by either a Master
Homeowner's Association, the Flood Control District or other similaz public facilities maintenance
mechanism.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-48
c~
z
~ o
CL - .. N
U ,_.~
G
z ,
~ = o
d a
p UQ otS a ~ ~ ~
~ ~ zv ° Q C
z z w ~-- ~
~ ¢ ¢° w
° °O q o
o Q ~a z ~
OV.
Q ~ ~ ~O
Q
~n Q I~
w _a
C'3 ~ r~ W ~ (!y ~
w
~ U
J LL~~
S ~.
'J~
1
t`
,.,
•,t
C R
G (V
Cfl
I~1
O
~...
VI ~ `\~
,'
O
Q
O
v¢vJ
• O
Margarita Village. lL~. ]Project development lPlan
Q ~. IPlann;ng Urea development standards
Development standazds have been established for the MARGARITA VII.t,pGE project on several levels:
Project-wide Design and Textual Development standazds in Section II.B.2, of this document and Design
Guidelines in Section III. This section is devoted to Planning standazds. The Director of Community
Development may approve minor variations from the standazds and design guidelines of the Specific Plan
without requiring.an amendmentto the Specific Plan.
Planning Areas were selected on the basis of logical, separate units of development. Criteria, considered
in this process included uniformity of use as it pertains to zoning and relationship to adjoining project and
j
surrounding topography.
The Planning Area graphics for this section were derived from the Specific.Plan Land Use Plan and the
landscaping guidelines and standazds contained in Section III, Design Guidelines. The site plans depicted
herein are conceptual in nature only, and aze not intended to represent actual or final site plans or layouts.
Although development may conform closely to some of the elements as depicted iri Figures II=16 through
II-31A, it is anticipated that actual lotting will not be determined until the tract map stage.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-50
Margarita Village . ID[. project ][Development ]Plan
~. (Planning Urea ]~
a. IIDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 1 is proposed as a 13.0.acre elementary school site. The Temecula Elementary
School Districhwill owri, maintain, and improve the 13.0.acre site. Refer to Figure II-16 for a
conceptual layout of Planning Area 1. It is expected that the school will contain athletic facilities
such as soccer and/or baseball fields. Final design of the school site will require the approval of the
Temecula Elementary School Boazd. -
b. ]Land Use and IIDevelopment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Planning Standards
• Access to Planning Area 1 will be from La Serena Way. (See Figure II-16.)
• The elementary school will be constructed by the Temecula Elementary School District
to their standazds and to the requirements of Riverside County, in addition to Specific
Plan standazds.
• A landscape buffer will be erected between the elementary school and the adjacent
residential uses in Planning Area 2. (See Figure II-16.)
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
r
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-51
J
a
~ W Q
~
~
~
~ Z ~ z
J -
Z '~ ~ ~~ z
W ~
~
0 j
Q
} . .
~- Q:
1 N W W ~ N! ~ ' W ~
W
N
W
4 ZZ
H
~ N
~ W W
}
}
g z ~ a a a
~
w
' Z
o
3
4 s
a
r Q z o z ~0 3 a.
S
~ 2
W
~O ~
~~
~~ Q
O~ ~
D ~ N g
~ Q Q ]. p
O
N
4 W .M 4 ~ .~-~ N cV ~
~! 4_. W N.
.~ N ^
f0 N N.
Q
3
a
0
`. \
.- ,
)'
` Q
F
.
_ a
~, a
/
r~
"
.~ ~: W
0
W
0
4
0
~``; a
i .. vi
~,
u
i
}, .
,`,
~}
N
pJ W
to U
aQ
`l /.:
{~ ~~° .
..
''
~..:
,~ .... ;;
.,~.
®`{.'`\
".~
~,
1
0
p~p~p
LuJ
V
qf1
o ~~/
N
C7
u. P
Q~
0
v ¢.v
.d
0
N
V1
G
1Vlargarita'Uillage l[l[. lProject ~evelopment'IPlan
B. (Planning area B
a. IDescriptive Summary
Planning -Area 2 will consist of Low Density Residential development: A maximum total of 27
dwelling units is proposed on 13.0 acres at a tazget density.of approximately 2.0 du/acre (Density
Range 0.4-2 du/ac). &oduct types will be limited to single-family detached residences. Please see
Figure;II-16 for a graphic representation of this Planning Area. Typical building elevations and
azchitectural guidelines aze provided in Design Guidelines, Section lII.C.3.
b. Y.and Use and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer.to Ordinance No.:348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Plannin¢ Standards
• Access to Planning Area 2 will be.provided duectly from La Serena'Way. (See Figure
II-16.)
a
•3 A landscape buffer will be erected between Planning Area 2 and the elementary school
site in Planning Area I. (See Figure II-16:)
• . A minimum of two pazlting spaces-shall be provided per dwelling unit. At least two of
• the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed garage, either attached to or separate from,
the main dwelling unit.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for. design-related criteria.
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-53
Margarita Village., .. ~. project development plan
3. planning Urea 3
a. -Descrintive Summary
As illustrated in Figure II-16, Planning'Area 3 is planned to contain Medium Density Residential
development on approximately 2.2 acres. A maximum total of 6 dwelling units is proposed at a
tazget density of approximately 2.7 du/acre (Density Range 2-5: du/ac). Product types will consist
of single-family detached dwellings. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines aze
provided in Section ]II.C.3., Design Guidelines.
b. ]Land YJse and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Planning Standards
~:~ Access to Planning Area 3 will be provided via a local street through Planning Area 2
from la Serena Way. (See Figure II-16.)
•~ A landscape buffer will be erected between Planning Area 2 and the elementary school
site in Planning Area 1.. (See Figure II-16.)
•r A minimum of two pazldng spaces shall be provided per dwelling unit. At least two of
the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed garage, either attached to or separate from,
the main dwelling unit.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
`~/
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-54
Margarita Village ~. lProject development lPlan
Q
4~. lPlanning [area 4
a. Descriptive Summary
Planning Area 4, as illustrated in Figure II-17, will contain a maximum of 51 dwelling units
at a tazget density of approximately 4.6 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). This Planning.
Area will be designated for Medium Density Residential development on approximately
11.0 acres. Planning Area 4 is proposed as afamily-oriented community. Typical building
elevations and architectural guidelines are provided in Section III.C.3., Design Guidelines.
b. g,and Use and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. 1'lannine Standards
•3 Primary access to Planning Area 4 will be provided from Meadows Parkway.
Additional access may be available from La Serena Way and/or through Planning Area
6. (See Figure II-17.)
• No permanent structures or buildings of any other sort than roadways will be permitted
within the MWD easement. All roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD
prior to the beginning of construction.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standards of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
v Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yard azeas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-55
J
Q
F` F_(w'J
o a
w ~
'
~ or
~ ~
a
Z
w .n
F
~itn C
7
a p w
~ a
c7'
° ~ ~
a
Q ~ ~
Q
Z~.
gW° ~
p.~
°~'~' .Y
~'Q~
.. ~. a1 r ~. 7. N. a .. a ~.
J
Q
2
F
z
Q
Q
F-
w
W
w
O
a
O
2
a
-,
N
~ _~
w ~
f„ 'a
W ='
N-
a !a
Q 'LL
z
w
0 }:~
~,Q
w
~ ~ x
~-
~ }
Q F o:F-
to
w
win
¢W w
°Co
a
~° "
'a
aZ7Q ~
W T aG
0
N
J
d '2 ~ N ~
,~ N
Z
F
U
W
Z
Z
0
U
Q
0
W - e
J
m
N .:-
'.,, ~ ~ ry .,`.
a ~ , ~. ~1
'_ ~
W
C7
LL
W
U
U
Q
W
J
fl]
~
~ ~
a ..
...- ..
D
n
..~
/.
i ``~
O~~
0
`~ 1
r
Z
w alS
~ a
W ='
~ -
O m
m
a ;
x °'
b LL
z m
~: N
G
Yi.
~~
l
0
v a-v
.d
Margarita Village, ~. ]Project Development (Plan
5. ]Planning Urea ~
a. IIDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 5 is planned as an 11.5-acre public park. Refer to Figures II-17 and III-37
for conceptual illustrations of possible pazk plan layouts for Planning Area 5. It is expected
.that the pazk will be oriented towazd active uses and, as such; may contain tennis courts,
basebalUsoftball and soccer fields. The actual layout of the public pazk will require review
and approval by the Temecula Community Services District.
b. Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. l'lannine Standards
• Access to Planning Area 5 may be permitted from a local street between Planning Areas
5 and 8. (See Figure II-17.)
a
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is planned at the entrance to the local street
at Planning Area 5 on Meadows Parkway. (See Figures III-34 and III-35.)
• Pazk improvement plans for this pazk site shall be submitted and approved in
conjunction with the submittal of the first tract map for either of the adjacent Planning
Areas (Planning Area 6 or Planning Area 8). The site design and amenities depicted
in Figures II-17 and III-37 are merely conceptual in nature and aze not intended to
represent actual layout and orientation of pazk facilities.
• No permanent structures or buildings of any other sort than roadways and pazking lots
will be permitted within the MWD easement. All roadways and other paved areas must
be reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of construction.
• Please refer to.Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
~./
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-57
Margarita Village l[][. ]Project ][Development IPlan
~. ]Planning area ~
a. Descriative Summary
Figure II-17 depicts Medium Density Residential development for the 53.0 acres in
Planning Area 6. A maximum total of 212 dwelling units is proposed for the site at a tazget
density of 4.0 du/acre (Density Range 2-5 du/ac): This Planning Area will be oriented
toward families. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines aze provided in
Section ]II.C.3., Design Guidelines.
b. 1•,and ZJse and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ~lannin>i Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 6 will be from La Serena Way. Additional access may
be available from Meadows Pazkway through Planning-Area 4, as well as through
Planning Areas 8 and 10/11/12 to Rancho California Road. (See Figure II-17.)
• A minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the entrance to Planning Area
6 on La Serena Way. (See Figures III-34 and III-35.)
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways and pazking lots
will be permitted within the MWD easement. All roadways and other paved areas must
be reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of construction.
•:* New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd aeeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further ]and use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-58
Margarita Village II. Project Development Plan
7. l~ll~>m>mnung ~>r~~ 7-~>r>rn~unall>mnt'>m>t ICY®. 9, ~p~>rnll ~®®5
The following language will replace the existing language for PA 7:
a. ~eSCrlptlVe Summary
Plannine Area 7 will contain F,erv Medium Density Residential, family oriented
development. A maximum total of ~ 29 dwelling units is planned at a tazget density of
d-3 2.64 dulacre one 10_97 acres (Density Range 22=5 A:4-2 du/ac). Refer to Figure II-
18 for a graphic representation of Planning Area 7. Typical building elevations and
architectural guidelines are provided in Section IILC.3, Design Guidelines.
b. ]Land ~Jse and -Development Standards
Please refer to the Speck Plan Ordinance Amendment and Section 17.060.040 of
the City of Temecula Development Code for standards not addressed in the
Specific Plan Ordinance Amendment No. 7 for PA 7.
c. Planning Standards
O o Possible access into Planning Area 7 may be taken from Butterfield Stage Road off
Ahern Place and Chemin Clinet (See Figure II-18).
o A minunum of two pazking spaces shall be provided per dwelling unit. At least two
of the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed gazage, either attached to, or separate
from, the main dwelling unit.
o Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2, for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
o Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
O
Specific Plan No. 3, Amendment No. 7 Page II-
a
w
a
c~
z
a
z
J
a
0 0 0
0
v ae
.d
~e
~. lPlanning area ~
a. IIDescriutive Summary
Planning Area 8 is planned for Medium Density Residential development on 21.0 acres.
A maximum total of 76 dwelling units is proposed at a tazgetdensity of approximately 3.6
du/acre (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). Figure II-18 shows a conceptual layout of important
design features in Planning Area 8. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines
are provided in Section III.C.3., Design Guidelines.
b. Land Use and IIDevelooment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
6• Access to Planning Area 8 will be available directly from Meadows Pazkway and
perhaps through Planning Areas 10/11/12. (See Figure II-18.)
•S A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is planned on Meadows Pazkway between
Planning Areas 5 and 8. (See Figures III-34 and III-35 J
•b An equestrian trail shall run parallel to Meadows Pazkway on the western side of
Planning Area 8.
:• A minunum of two pazking spaces shall be provided per dwelling unit. At least two of
the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed garage, either attached to, or separate from,
the main dwelling unit.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
•'r Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-61
Margarita Village II. Project Development Plan
9~. ]Pll~~Inn~~ ~>re~ ~A-A><nnelna~l>mneln>t 1~1®. 7, A>r~>rnll 2®®5 ~1
The following language will be added to the eaisting language of Planning Area 9 for the
new subsection PA9A:
a. ~eSCrIptlVe SnmmarV
Plannine Area 9A will contain Low Density Residential. family oriented
develomment. A maximum total of 8 dwellire units is alarmed at a tareet density of
1.08 du/acre on 7.35 acres (Density Ranee 0.4-2 du/acl. Tvmical buildine elevations
and architectural euidelines are mrovided in Section III.C.3.. Design Guidelines
In adddition, an amrroaimately 1.16 acre uark is beimg arbmosed at the southern
end of PA 9A that may contain a tot lot and associate mlav equimment, benches
and a massive turf area Refer to Figure II-19 for a concemtual gramhic
b. band Use and Development Standards
Please refer to the Specific Plan Ordinance Amendment and Section 17.060.040 of
the City of Temecula Develomment Code for standards not addressed in the
Srecilic Plan Ordinance Amendment No. 7 for PA 9.
c. Plannine Standards
o Primary access into Planning Area 9A will be taken from
Placer Loudeaoume.
o A minimum of two pazking spaces shall be provided per dwelling unit. At least two
of the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed gazage, either attached to, or sepazate
from, the main dwelling unit.
c Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2, for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
o Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 3, Amendment No. 7 Page II-
J
d
a >>
FU Q }}
NU ~ W ~
~
~ t7
W D
M w
~
~
pQ D
y G
~ ~ c
r W w~
~
~y
W ~ 1
-
Wy j
a ~ Ky Q }
y
F
y
Q ~ yy
F w ~ C9
Z
w
y ap
FU <
(9 W H
UU aU' Q
O F-G
~
Z W
D U<
a~ Z
g W
pU QQ
>> Z
Z UU
?U
tt
J O Q p G ~v ~ J ~ J =
m N
~
d
J
p f 1. ^~
d G O N
Q
J A O D r a
d wy~
.
~
G N N~ N
z
0
U
w
Z
Z
O
U
O
Q
O
R
w
J
[D
y
O
a
2
f
r
~;
~~ r
~..
~ ~~.~ ~~
( ~
W
W
LL
m
O
W
a
a
a
Z
U
0
0
~~N]]]
Q r A'!
~J
~
z ~
q
„
^~;
~
5"'
~'~
°
Q 4
z
~U e
~ ~.,
ww
~ U
~ W
u., ~
E jil
i _~.:
s ~',.+ a
y~~ O':
~. ~'
w m
~~
w
-~
~ w
~ m
a
~ _~
O
rr ~
0
v ~v
.d
O
Margarita Village ][l[. ]Project lLDevelopment (Plan
O
Il®. 1Planning Areas ]L®/]ll~/lL~
a. fiDescriutive Summary
Planning Areas .10/11/12, as shown in Figure II-19, will contain' Medium Density
Residential development on 52.8 acres: A maximum of 215 single-family dwellings are
proposed at a target density of approximately 4.1 du/acre (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).
Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided in Section III.C.3.,
Design Guidelines.
b. Land Use and HDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ~lannine Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 10/11/12 will be from Rancho California Road.
Additional access may be available through Area 8. (See Figure II-19.)
• A Major Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the entrance into Planning
Areas 10/11/12 on Rancho California Road. (See Figures III-32 and III-33.)
• As shown in Figure II-19, a 70-foot buffer along Butterfield Stage Road is required
adjacent to Medium Density Residential uses.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along streetrights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yard azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-64
Margarita Village ICIl. ]Project IlDevelopment ]Plan
Il Il. ]Planning E~rea Il3
a. lDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 13, ss shown on Figure II-2Q shall be devoted to Medium Density
Residential development on about 47.4 acres. A maximum total of 109 dwellings aze
'proposed at a tazget density of approximately 2.3 du/acre (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).
Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines aze provided in Section III.C.3.,
Design Guidelines.
b. Y,and Use and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. PlanninE Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 13 will be from Rancho California Road and Rancho
Vista Road. Additional access will also be provided directly from Rancho Vista Road.
(See Figure II-20.)
• Please see Figure III-38, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan. ~
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is planned at the entrance into Planning
Area 13 on Rancho California Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
• An equestrian trail shall run pazallel to Rancho California Road on the north side of
Planning Area 13.
• A minimum of two pazlting spaces shall be provided per dwelling uniF. At least two of
the spaces shall be provided in an enclosed garage, either attached to, or sepazate from,
the main dwelling unit.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
1
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-65
Margarita Village l[][. IProject development IPlan
llB. ]Planning area Il41
a. Descriptive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-20, Planning Area 14 shall be devoted to Medium Density
Residential development on 38.1 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a
maximum of 175 units with a tazget density of approximately 4.6 du/acre (Density Range
2-5 du/ac). Housing in this area will consist primarily of single-family detached homes.
A typical site plan and elevations aze provided in the Design Guidelines, Section III.C.4.
b. g,and Use and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 14 will be provided from both Rancho California and
Rancho Vista Roads. (See Figure II-20.)
• Please see Figure III-39, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan of Planning Area 14.
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the entrance in Planning Area
14 on Rancho California Road. (See Figure III-50 and III-51.)
:• An equestrian trail shall run parallel to Rancho California Road on the north side of
Planning Area 14.
•3 A tot lot and playground azea has been tentatively planned for inclusion in Planning
Area 14. (See Figure II-20.)
• A landscape buffer is planned along the boundary between Planning Areas 14 and 19
to sepazate the residential uses in Planning Area 14 from the adjoining commercial
uses.
:• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
:• Building separation between dwelling units shall not be less than 10 feet for dwellings
up to 28 feet in overall height. Building sepazation shall be increased by one foot for
each foot by which any adjoining building exceeds 28 feet in overall height. Attached
garages may encroach a maximum of 5 feet into the required building sepazation
provided no living portions of adjoining dwellings encroach into the required building
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-67
Margarita Village ~. ]Project ][Development ]Plan
sepazation and provided building sepazation between structures is not reduced below
10 feet. Building separation shall mean the distance between the structural portions of
adjoining dwellings as measured from the point where the dwellings aze nearest:
provided, however, that a yazd encroachment permitted under the Temecula Develop-
ment Code shall not be considered a structural portion for the determination of building
separation.
• Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero ]ot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yard azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
.+
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-68
Margarita Village ~. IProject development (Plan
O
1~3. (Planning E~rea ~J
a. IDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 15 will consist of Medium Density Residential development. A maximum
total of 255 dwelling units aze proposed on 80.9 acres at a density of approximately 2.8
du/acre (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). Please see Figure II-21 for a graphic representation of
this Planning Area. Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided
in Design Guidelines, Section III.C.4.
b. Land Use and dDevelopment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Access to Planning Area 15 will be available from both Meadows Pazlcway and Rancho
Vista Road. (See Figure II-21.)
:• Please see Figure III-40, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan of Planning Area 15.
• Two Minor Project Entry landscape treatments proposed at entrance points into
Planning Area 15 on Rancho Vista Road. (See Figures III-SO.and III-51 J
:• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along streetrights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or.cottunon wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-69
J
Q
' ~ W
~ f.~
Z
(y~
O z
WQ
N W ~ Y
'r ~ ~,,, F
W
F.. W
~
Z
~ ~ ,
~ ~
Q
$ ~ a o ~o
W o ~ ~ ~
d g W N N_N
a
Q
W'
O
y
rS
~ ~..
W F-
~ ~ Z
~~
~ Z, ~Q
g~ (W7a
U
Z ~ ¢ ~
~ H G
~ f0 _ N
~
b
a CO N.
i
~t4,,.~~1 ~..
N
1
W
C7
LL ~ ~
~_
Q ~
H
Z -
W etl
H o
W =~
~ -
~ ~.
a ~
~ rn
O "
Z d
N
Cs
0
v¢v
.d
o a
Margarita Village ]III. lProject llDevelopment IPlan
]I~. ]Planning E~rea ll~
a. Descriptive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-21, Planning Area 16 shall be devoted to Medium Density
Residential housing on 59.5 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a maximum
of 183 units with a tazget density of approximately 3.1 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).
Housing in this area will consist primarily of single-family detached homes. Typical
building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are provided in the Design Guidelines,
Section ]II.C.4.
b. ]Land Use and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Access to Planning Area 16 will be available from Meadows Pazlcway and Pauba Road.
(See Figure II-21.)
:• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
Sl[U3t10RS.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yard areas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
• Please see Figure ]II-40, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan of Planning Area 16.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
4• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-71
Margarita Village l[~. project development plan
~~. p~~][IlIIIlIlIIIlg L~II'eid ~ 1
a. IDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 17, as shown on Figure II-22, shall be devoted to Medium Density housing
on about 34.4 acres. A maximum total of 108 dwellings are proposed at a target density of
approximately 3.1 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). Typical building elevations and
azchitectural guidelines are provided in the Design Guidelines in Section lII.C.4.
b. Land tJse and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
•3 Access to Planning Area 17 will be provided from Rancho Vista and Pauba Roads.
(See Figure II-22.)
• Minor Project Entry landscaping treatments are proposed at the entrances into Planning
Area 17 on both Rancho Vista and Pauba Roads. (See Figures III-50 & III-51.)
f* New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
•:~ Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or cotttmon wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in. side yazd azeas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
• Please see Figure 1II-40, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan of Planning Area 17.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
C~
~;
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-72
J
<
~ ~.iw
7 ~ z
u
l
o ~
W~~
J
T Q O}
~ P O
}
~
W fA
~ N
F V Q
$ a< a z
~v
~ ~< 0 30 $ g oYa
~ Wa ~ o~ < w a2~,.,
a' gw,~ o
.- ri
ri, cv, .~,
d .w c <
W r a v
10~
~' \t
~ .~~ ~ ~ i
~,~•.~
`.
i x
i^sx~-T
~`~ ~ ~
I
'•_%"(/~
ZQ ~
~:~ 6 ,...
~~ ~~~~
,,, \„`
~~:
~ ^%~ ~`'"
... i ",~, ~ 'v
{
': i
O
Z
O
F
U
w
Z
Z
~ 3
w o
U <
a o
w w
J J
(0 m
y ~
O y
a d
~ ~
~.... ~
i j
,. ,
_ i
i
~'~.
~'~~8~y?
.~ ~~ _ d
SMOOb3W
~:~~ ~
~ __r
\ ~
m~
N
N
I
u
~ ~°
. 9
J
<
7
H
a
w
U
Z
O
U
<
2
O ui
LL H
co ~
~ ~
w a
°C w
~' ~
W ~
W
W ~
~ ~
W
O
O }
Z J
~ ~
FZ- ~
W ey
~ N
w~
N
m
a ~
~ LL
z d
~ N
p
m
a
L1 ~
0
vcv
`/
m
r
b
Margarita Village ~. ]Project ][Development ]Plan
O ~~. IPIl~lrnnnn>mg A>r~~ Il~
a. IIDescrintive Sununary
Planning Area 18, as illustrated in Figure II-22, is planned as the site of a future combined
elementary school and public pazk. The pazk site will contain approximately 4.3 net acres
and the school will be located on approximately 10.0 net acres. It is expected that Planning
Area 18 will contain athletic facilities such as soccer and/or softball fields. The actual
layout of the school and adjoining public pazk facility will depend upon cooperation
between the appropriate school district and the Temecula Community Services District.
b. ].and >(Jse and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Plannine Standards
• Access into the pazk may be provided from. either Meadows Parkway or from a local
street in Planning Area 17. Access to the elementary school site will be from a local
street in Planning Area 17 that will connect to Rancho Vista Road. (See Figures II-22
and III-40.)
• Parking facilities for the school and park may be combined, provided that any such
plans have been reviewed and approved by the School District and the Temecula
Community Services District.
• Pazk and school improvement plans for this site shall be submitted and approved at a
later stage of development. The site design and amenities depicted in Figures II-22 and
III-53 aze merely conceptual in nature and aze not intended to represent actual layout
and orientation of school and pazk facilities.
• Please see Figure III-40, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for the relationship
between Planning Area 18 and the surrounding Planning Areas.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-74
Margarita Village ~. project ~Development.plan
~7. pfl~IIIlIIIlIlIlIlg .area ~~
a. IDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 19, illustrated in Figure II-23, has been designated as a 6.20 acre commercial
site. It is expected that this Planning Area will contain a variety of neighborhood retail
commercial and service uses for Mazgarita Village residents.
b. ]Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Plannine Standards
• Access into Planning Area 19 may be taken from both Rancho California Road and
Meadows Pazkway. (See Figure II-23.)
• A landscape buffer shall be provided on the boundary between the commercial uses in
Planning Area 19 and the residential uses in Planning area 14.
•r An equestrian trail shall run pazallel to Rancho California Road on the north side of
Planning Area 19. f
• Please see Figure III-39, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for the relationship
between Planning Area 19 and Planning Area 14.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further ]and use standazds that apply site-wide.
•? Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-75
a '~.~
~ ~, .~ rT
a
y ~ - a
12 ~ CW7 W ~ N ~'~~ z ~ ~ ,,,f~,~
`~ "" ~ -N ~
0 ~~ } W~ ~ ~ V m M. N N N ,,,---0
m
~~JJ ~
r N 2 ~ Fr- N Z~ ~} v m N
'~''. ,Q ~} W~ Q W W s O v v ~' N
Q Q Q Z F O Q (7 'a., ~ 7 ~ p N M ~ IV~LnU 1C
m
OX ~oVC ~ ~ Q ¢ ~ ~ O ¢ ~,`~ rn cv
'.cW ~ Q m N O. W ~ d t7 ~"/~L/1
~~. ` Q 'g ~ Q ~ Q~ ~ 7 Q ~~ ~ 0 N dP ~ 1'11
Q ~ N QQJ 0 ~ ~ 10 JQJ Q::M ~ ~ OD M W C7
~~ ~O t0 a ~~~ M et 'N 6 g ~ fp (G 10 Y ~
M Zm
^~
T
a
i
Z
m
Q
U ~ a LL
y
Q W r: ~
a m
J W ~ O
y °w m a
y y ~ cQi
O'
a ad LL o
Oa m Z
a Fes- `~ ~
~ v ,.~~ ~~~...
;, ~ / ` O
';o ~
ac
-% i
o - ~~ 4
„; F-
.. ~r'f 't ~ r .. i ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ N
.~ I . ~. ,~.. ` Y ~
.\\ m
f i ~ c 1, 4.
~ of
`l i,'.
,(,x~' i Z rv.
.-y.'4. Y f9 k r ~ OQ / '~' ~ ~ rTf ~~~ kkk / m
',i[_ 1. ~r Q. ~lJ ; ~ g «. ~3
~ ~ ~~
_„~~ Q yF . ,,, 1 v ~~ ~ _ f
i a'
< ~ U .: ._
t ~ 'y ~ l / ('}f j ~ ~
~. 1 ' -X
U~ ,~/
y r i f c (/^~ ~ /
~ f
a ~.P ,~: ~
o ,., i
n; ti~
/ ` ~ f,
. / ~' W.
',~, x;5".8 '~~ ~ s. ~.
"°~~ ~I
v~ ; ~ `
O
~ 4 ,`f~
_ ,
ttd '
\J ~.
0
o rn.v
~~
~"
Margarita Village l[l[. I~roject IlDevelopment ]Plan
llg. ]PIlannrmn>mg Ares 2®
a. BDescrintive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-23, Planning Area 20 shall be devoted to Medium Density
..Residential housing on 12.1 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a maximum
of 54 units with a tazget density of approximately 4.5 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).
Housing in this area will consist primarily of single-family detached homes. Typical
building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided in-the Design Guidelines,
Section III.C.4.
b. Y.and Use and IDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Plannine Standards
• Access to Planning Area 20 will be available from an access road off of Rancho Vista
Road. (See Figure II-23.)
•'r A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the intersection of the access
road and Rancho Vista Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
:• Please see Figure III-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the sandazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-77
Margarita Village ~. project development plan
Ili. pll~allrnn>mg ~re~ 2Il "'
a. IDescrintive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-23, Planning Area 21 shall be devoted to Medium High Density
Residential housing on 10.3 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a maximum
of 62 units with a density of approximately 6.0 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). Housing
in this Area will consist primarily of single-family detached homes. Typical building
elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided in the Design Guidelines, Section
IILC.4.
b. Land Use and II)evelonment Standards .
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
•~ Access into Planning Area 21 will be available from an access street between Rancho
California Road and Meadows Pazkway. (See Figure II-23.)
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the intersection of the access
street and Rancho California Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.) ,
• An equestrian trail shall run pazallel to Rancho California Road on the north side of
Planning Area 21.
:• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced [o accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case, shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-78
Margarita Village ~. I~roject Development flan
2®. ~~aIlIlIIIlIlIlIlg E~rei~ ~~
a. 1Descriutive Summary
Planning Area 22 will consist of Medium Density Residential development. A maximum
of 40 dwelling s are proposed on 10.9 acres at a tazget density of approximately 3.7 du/ac
(Density Range 2-5 du/ac). Please see Figure II-24 for a graphic representation of this
Planning Area. Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are provided in
Design Guidelines, Section 1II.C.4.
b. ]Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Planning Standards
•'r Primary access to Planning Area 22 will be available via a local street (Street "A") from
Rancho Vista Road, as well as from Rancho Vista Road directly. (See Figure II-24.)
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the intersection of Rancho
Vista Road and Street "A", and at a point in between the two. (See Figures III-50 and
III-51.)
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along streetrights-of-
way where the standards of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply -and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
•S Please see Figure III-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a graphic
representation of a possible site layout plan for Planning Area 22.
•3 Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-79
J
Q J
Q
W Z U
2
° N
Z~ u+ 1
b~
N¢.
~}
.N ~i
~ o
HF
~ } ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
~Z'
1Il
LJ FO .< ~ Fa...O
C
~9 V a (9 G V Q
~~ aooc ~ ?ao 00
J W o o n in J Woo ,~ N
;G. g ~ of Of N 4 ~ .- V V'~.N
Z
W
W
1
fd
rn
~ ~If 1 ~~~
a \\ `
..- A,_
..- ` ,
,~ I
.,
g'( .. r:
f;,
,.
....
~. ~<
~ 1 ` `r( t
,}V , '
. • I Z ~ .' ., ~n..r
~~
V 1" ~
,~ I / ~ ~ ti, _ ~.
~, i
I ~
C ' ~ 'I 1 ~~ ~ ~ .I ~ 1~ `; I l
1~ I~~ ~~
~ I+ f ~
+k}V 1 ~ ~ ` ~ ' }}, ((~ i
` I .,~., - ti ~ ... i, y~ 1
~ ~
i ~ ~, ~
;.
., , ~~ \i~
~ ~~ i ac ,, _ _ . i .
,~' ~, ~ ~ ti
. \ ,ti n. 1 iii V1~ !.
~~
sF
N,
~
~ N
~
LL .
Cb
Margarita Village ~. project Development (Plan
2Il. pllannrmnlmg ~lr~a 23
a. IDescriptive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-24, Planning Area 23 shall be devoted to Medium Density
Residential housing on 10.2 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a maximum
of 46 units at a tazget density of approximately 4'.5 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).j
Housing in this Area will consist primarily of single-family detached homes. Typical
building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided in the Design Guidelines,
Section lII.C.4.
b. Y,and Use and 1Develonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Plannine Standards
• Access to Planning Area 23 will be from a local access road (Street "A") off of Rancho
Vista Road. (See figure II-24.)
:• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required separation between detached stmctures.
• Please see Figure 1II-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a graphic
representation of a possible site layout plan for Planning Area 23.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textural Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
d• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-81
Margarita Village ][][. project llDevelopment plan
22. plla>mllnn>mg area 2~ `-~~'
a. dDescriative Summary
Planning Area 24, as shown on Figure II-25, shall be devoted to Medium High Density
housing on about 16.9 acres. A maximum total of 91 dwellings is proposed at a tazget
density of approximately 5.4 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). Typical building elevations
and azchitectural guidelines are provided in the Design Guidelines in Section IILC.4.
b. Land Use and IDevelopment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
S• Primary access to Planning Area 24 will be a local street off of Rancho California Road
and connecting to Meadows Pazkway. (See Figure II-25.)
•8 A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the intersection of the local
street and Rancho California Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
:• An equestrian trail shall run parallel to Rancho California Road on the north side of
Planning Area 24. At the western boundary of Planning Area 24, the equestrian trail
will enter the MWD easement and follow the easement in a southerly direction. (See
Figure II-25.)
•'r New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along streetrights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please see Figure 1II-42, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-82
F
. W
_~
cW7 ~ ~ c
7
w
~ y Z
a
w Z
v y Z
a
~ w a
~
~
~
'W
~ }}
F
a
N Ul ~.
W ~p N
N 2 W fA
a W C7 . Z a C7 Z
o
¢~
= ~o ¢ y a
a
~~ V U
as <
cu W
e U Q
a ~
~~ Q> C O ~ ~ Q 7 p
D 0
a ~ rn O d, ~ J W m o n
fi ~
d. g ~ ~: N b d g r V' l7
. N
Z
O
F
U
W
Z
Z
O
U
3
0
a
0
W
J
m
O
a
Z
a
I-
y
W "+
m
C7 a
w '
o m
W ~
y ~
d J lL
m.
a 1~-`~
}
~ ~
H =
Z -
w ~e
U ~
W ~
O
a
Q a
O "
Z m
~ N
-~o~ ~<
oyr
i
y
w
U
w
m
O
a
~_
~, ~ N
N
I
W
~
pp
~J
LL
0
Q ~
vrnv
•~
C?
~,
C7~
C~
Margarita Village ][l[. lProject l[Development 1Plan
0
23. l~Il~lrnnrn>mg ~r~a 25
a. Descriptive Summary
As depicted in Figure II-25, Planning Area 25 shall be devoted~to Medium Density
Residential housing on 10.9 acres. This Planning Area may be developed with a maximum
of 40 units with a tazget density of approximately 3.7 du/ac (Density Ranch 2-5 du/ac).
Housing in this Area will consist primarily of single-family. detached homes. Typical
building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze provided in the Design Guidelines,
Section 1II.C.4.
b. band Use and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. i'lannine Standards
0
•? Access to Planning Area 25 will be available via a local roadway (Street "A") between
Planning Areas 23 and 25. Additional access may be available from Rancho California
Road through Planning Area 24. (See Figure II-25.)
:• An equestrian trail adjacent to the western boundary of the Planning Area shall be
developed within or adjacent to the MWD easement.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
•'r Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd areas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please see Figure III-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a graphic
representation of a possible site layout plan.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
0
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-84
Margarita Village _ ID[. lProject llDevelopment IlPllan
2~4. ]~llann>rni>mg ~lr~a 2~
a. dDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 26 will consist of Medium Density Residential development. A maximum
total of 105 dwelling units are proposed on 23.5 acres at a tazget density of about 4.5 du/ac
(Density Range 2-5 du/ac). Product types will be limited to single-family detached
residences. Please see Figure II-26 for a graphic representation of this Planning Area.
Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines are provided in Design Guidelines,
Section III.C.4.
b. g,and Use and YDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Plannine Standards
• Access to Planning Area 26 will be provided from Rancho Vista Road via a loop road
(Street "A") between Planning Area 26 and Areas 22/23. In addition, there may be a
possible roadway connection between Planning Areas 26 and 27. (See Figure II-26.)
4+ A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the intersection of Street "A"
and Rancho Vista Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
• Please see Figure III-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a graphic
representation of a possible site layout plan for Planning Area 26.
d• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways will be permitted
within the MWD easement. All roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD
prior to the beginning of construction.
• An equestrian trail adjacent to the western boundary of the Planning Area shall be
developed within or adjacent to the MWD:easement.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
:• Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd areas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-85
Margarita Village ~. (Project development (Plan
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
O
l ~i
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-86
~ z a
o w Q
0
~
N Q W y
W Y
~
2
O
y ~
O
¢ U
Q
(7
j Q 7
8. ~ ]
~ ~
~J ~ N o
,
fl r2 N ,- of N
_a
~ } w
z
o m
w ~ o
y ~- ~ r
N ~ W ~
y N
~ )'
wF
~~ ~.
¢ Z
w
o a N
wz
~
t Z F'
U
U ~
< ~
G7p ¢ ¢ L7Q
Z ~ ~
p ~
7 Z J
Q
Q Q Q 0 ~ ~=
0
g oD N a N a fn .r-
W
U
U
Q
w
J
fd
~r~b a
~>
,:... {~;
r ~ ~
' J -~-~ 133H1S,
:.`®
~t ;
~,:
.\ ,
~` „
o ee
~ooele ~.
! `.~ ~.!
0
!e
- ee .ooee ..,.
0 4ety,
e~!~ ;Q
~~~ ~
Ca6eA~j1~e4~~1
„!!~i ~D!
Ply
/~a ; ~ ,1 !
.~ ~~
,' i _~
.~, 1 ~ ._.
2 "~
zF I
W tll
F
W o
~ N
m
a
¢ 9
~'
~`
O
z
~ m
N
z
O
1=
W
, Z
it ~ ~
1
~ a
!, ;`
~ o
, ~
~
w
}+ m
~
' a
'1
ii t ^-~ i
;`~~ C
:~
C
(~
~~
Q~~
o~
~ 4^
i' ~ ~
~. ~ ~.
Q
~~I v,;
>,~
~~ ~`...
i~
1~
,,,.~
~...
's '~'"
~~~-4P~~G.. _ ,
~~~.
ti,
dQ ~~~ ~
~b~eF \
... "°~~,
l ,:':' ~il~:
7
y
J
H
Z
Q
W
w
D
W
y
O
a
f~
~~j77
6 ~J
~ ~'
N
1
W
=
~ ~A,~
*~
7
C
LL
0
Q ~
v a.v
•~
C7
Margarita Village ~. I~roject ~evelopment.l~lan
25. lPll~im>mn>rIlg Alrea 29
a. &)escriptive Summary
As illustrated in Figure II-26, Planning Area 27 is planned to contain Medium Density
Residential development on approximately 8.1 acres.. A maximum total of 36 dwelling
units are proposed at a target density of approximately 4.4 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac).
Product types will consist of single-family detached dwellings. Typical building elevations
and architectural guidelines aze contained in Section III.C.4., Design Guidelines.
b. Land Use and Develoument Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 27 will be available directly from Rancho Vista Road.
Additional access may be available through Area 26. (See Figure II-26.)
:• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is ptoposed at the entrance to Planning Area
27 along Rancho Vista Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
~'r Please see Figure III-41, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan for Planning Area 27.
• An equestrian trail adjacent to the western boundary of the Planning Area shall be
developed within or adjacent to the MWD easement.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
:• Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yard azeas reduce the
required separation between detached structures.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
0
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-88
Margarita Village ~. lProject development ]flan
~~. ~~e~IlIlltltaflIlg ~II'4'~ 2~ `J>
a. lDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 28 has been designated as the future location of an 11.0-acre school
administration facility. This site is intended to act as the administration center for the
Temecula Elementary School District. See Figure II-26 for a graphic representation of this
Planning Area.
b. Y,and Use and YDevelopment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Planning Standards
• Access to the School Administration facility in Planning Area 28 will be from Rancho
Vista Road. (See Figure II-26.)
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways or pazking areas
will be permitted within the MWD easement. All roadways and parking azeas must be
reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of construction.
• Please see Figure III-43, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual
representation of the relationship between Planning Areas 28 and the surrounding
Planning Areas.
• An equestrian trail adjacent to the eastern boundary of the Planning Area shall be
developed within or adjacent [o the MWD easement.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Q
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-89
Margarita Village l[][. ]Project ][Development ]Plan
B'~. ]Plla>rnnnn>mg Area 2~
a. llDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 29, as illustrated in Figure II-27, will contain a maximum of 136 dwelling
units at a tazget density of approximately 4.0 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). This
Planning Area will be designated for Medium Density Residential development on
approximately 33.8 acres. Planning Area 29 is proposed as afamily-oriented community.
Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze contained in Section III.C.4.,
Design Guidelines.
b. ]Land Use and IDeveloument Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. 1'lannin>z Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 29 will be available directly from Rancho Vista Road.
Additional access may be provided through Planning Area 30 to Rancho California
Road. (See Figure II-27.)
•? Minor Project Entry landscape treatments are proposed at each of the entrances into
~~~JJJ Planning Area 29 from Ranch Vista Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
• Please see Figure III-43, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a conceptual site
layout plan of Planning Area 29.
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways or pazking azeas
will be permitted within the MWD easements on either side of Planning Area 29. All
roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of
construction.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No. 461 shall apply and in zero lot line
situations.
Interior side yards may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd areas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-90
a
w'
~ 0
m
w
o zed } Z Q
..N ~ F F}- M ~ F- F-
~
Z ~ ~ ~ F G
za oQ c~ = v a
Q 0 ~ f0 p M a W ~ ~ N M.
JJ W
4. ~ t0,
M, I
d' N J
y
g
M n
.- of I
in
~ ~~~(~ ,i:,K Oaa d s Z
_ a op U
oa ~_
~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ Ia1,Y~ q~~~ 0
i o--//~~_yy""
(/jp ~ b ~~
d~ !y so Q
~~~; ~ ` F ' 0~-Q~~~ 1`~I
~; ~ ! of ~,, a~
~~_ '~~.~ti , r ~aa0- J. 60 O
~~' ,..._ ~ i ~ i ~ °o°a~V°ooi w
dj. J
i Q:~~ ~ } d ~~ . ~qo ' iA.
Si ~
",
l.~,r~ ¢ ~Y ~o' a
,_(y
' d z)
~ {~
~ i `
~' ~ s
{ _ J
Z i
~ ~ r' 4
~• .. ~
'~.
}
@et6~ ®o0p0j0° ~y`yY• ~~ `' f ri,(j~ ' / ~'1O~I
rt ~~,1
c~°a 1'11p0 A., tA;3,,a
e°°jaa1~°~o°j°1j~ ~ , ~
l
,n* ^'w 1 °° ,° °~°p °0I
F' k4i °1+~~°joaaac
N
W
etl
U ~
w !
O
a ~'
0
OC O1
O I`
? m
~ y
~ G
C
0
o
N
i
W pp
~J
~ ~ r_
o
Qo
vcv
.d
Margarita Village ][][. lProject IlDevelopment flan.
0
B~. ]~Ila>rn>mn>mg area 3®
a. IIDescriutive Summary
Figure II-27 depicts Medium High Density Residential development for the 33.4 acres in
Planning Area 6. A maximum total of 173 dwellings aze proposed for the site at a tazget
density of approximately 5.2 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). j This Planning Area will be
oriented towazd families. Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are
contained in Section III.C.4., Design Guidelines.
b. Y.and Use and Planning Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access to Planning Area 30 will be available from Rancho California Road.
Secondary access may be provided through Planning Area 29 to rancho Vista Road.
(See Figure II-27.)
0
• Minor Project Entry landscape treatments aze proposed at each entrance into this
Planning Area from Rancho California Road. (See Figures III-50 and III-51.)
•? Please see Figure III-44, Village "C": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for a graphic
representation of a possible site layout plan for Planning Area 30.
• A 30-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement runs along the western
edge of Planning Area 30.
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways or pazking azeas
will be permitted within the MWD easements on either side of Planning Area 30. All
roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of
construction.
• New property lines shall be located at the tops of slopes, except along street rights-of-
way where the standazds of Ordinance No.461 shall apply and in zero lot line situation.
• Interior side yazds may be reduced to accommodate zero lot line or common wall
situations, except that in no case shall the reduction in side yazd azeas reduce the
required sepazation between detached structures.
w
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-92
Margarita Village ][][. lProject development I[~lan
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development.Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
•'r Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
~.
0
J
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-93
Margarita Village ][lI. lProject development IPlan
J
B~. I~Il~nnrrn>mg ~re~ 3fl
a. IIDescriutive Summary
Planning Area 31 is planned as a 5.3-acre church site. Figure II-28 is a graphic illustration
of Planning Area 31. Figure 1II-43 shows the relationship of Planning Area 31 to the
surrounding Planning Areas.
b. Y,and YJse and 1Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Plannins Standards
• Possible access into Planning Area 31 may be provided from Mazgarita Road. (See
Figure II-28.)
• A 25-foot wide landscape easement is planned in Planning Area 31 along Margarita
Road.
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways and parking areas
will be permitted within the MWD easement. All roadways and parking areas must be
reviewed an approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of construction.
• A 30-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement is planned to serve as the
border between the residential uses in Planning Area 32 and the church in Planning
Area 31.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2 for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-94
a ~~
~
z ~'
~
w o}
0~'f M ~ .F-
~ c~9.
W W ~ Z
~ W
H W
F ~. < W
~ H ~ V
Z y
2 ~ Z Q a ~ LL
z~a z °a oo° $ ~a
~ a x a
~x of
Utn J ~a
x~ °°o,i
~r
d
~~i
a a ao
~ ~
~.1
~ ~
N
I
w
x
w
z
• w
w
w ~ ~
z Q w `an
a WWw
J J 3 a
~ y ~ U
~ ~ co+>
~ N J
~.~
m
w 9
Q LL. ~
m N
m
~ N
I
00
~ 00~ 1100,0 ~. , F ~ / ~~ ~ i
/ 0 l
9 B~~ i ;,~ 00000 •~ ~~`(~ ~~~ ~ \ \
Q ~ 00 -(~ SOOBOIO `f~~p•ta ro"Y'~ ~ ~ ~ 't, 0 ~ \.
Q. ~ 1App0 ,yt ~„~.. 400 •..• L ;~ r ~\\ Y ~~ ~ ~ '
O ~ . > , ~ 0000 V}~,( 0p0~00 •r. ~~ ~. ~
z~PQ ~ ~a.,,rN~w~sb~ d~ ~R 1~ 1 ~ ~ , F
O C„p 00 ~ Cf'^ 1 ,
,m~, ~ ~~ - E , ,~ 4 p ~.e0~ ~ii r O
y~ 1 ` ~.e~o~ 4~ ~ ' C `i ~ Q ~~ - Y ~~, ~ p p~4~boy ~ 4~4 oo*o~Q ~% ~Zd~
. ~ a
i~~. ~ v
{.1.. Q.. .~ ~~ c k u~44
~\ ~ ~ ~ / ~.~ ~ ,0~~ e - (NCO
•" ,`•e~.
• od
1'~
/ ~. ~,
• .> ; ~, 1 ;
O~ ~~
~_.~
Margarita'Village . - ID[. lProject development ]Plan
O 3®. IPIl~>m>rnn>mg ~re~ 3B
a. llDescrintive Summary
Figure II-28 depicts High Density Residential development for the 14.4 acres in Planning
Area 32. A maximum total of 158 dwellings aze proposed for the site at a target density o
of approximately 11.0 du/ac (Density Range 8-14 du/ac): This Planning Area will be
oriented towazd families. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines are
contained in Section IILC.4., Design Guidelines.
b. Y.and Use and IIDevelopment Standards
Please-refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary'access to Planning Area 32 will be available from Rancho California Road.
Additional access may be available from Mazgarita Road. (See Figure II-28.)
:• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways will be permitted
O within the MWD easement. All roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD
prior to the beginning of construction.
• A 30-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement is planned to serve as the
border between the residential uses in Planning Area 32 and the church in Planning
Area 31.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textua] Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
•S Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-96
Margarita Village l[I[. IProject ][Development llPllan
3Il. l~lla>lannn>mg Area 32A
a. IIDescriative Summary
A Post Office facility on 5.0-acres is planned in Planning Area 32A.'
b. (Land Use'and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922: (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards • .:: ~ :.
• Primary access into Planning Area 32A will be provided from Rancho California Road.
(See Figure II-28.)
• A Village Core Arrival Point landscape treatment is planned at the intersection of
Rancho California Road and Mazgarita Road. (See Figure III-26.)
•i Automobile storage space shall be provided as required by Section 18.12 of this
Ordinance.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for land use standazds that apply site-wide.
•'s Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
C~
O
J
i
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-97
~`~ Margarita Village ~. lProject development ]Plan
3B. ]Planning Area 33
a. IIDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 33 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-29, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 82 dwelling units are planned at a target
density of approximately 5.1 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning azea will be
designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately 16.0 acres.
Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are depicted in Section III.C.2.
b. ]Land tJse and IIDeveloyment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access into Planning Area 33 will be provided from Margarita Road. (See
Figure II-29.)
• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the entrance into this
O Planning Area from Mazgarita Road. A Minor Project Entry is a simplified- version of
a Major Project Entry; it contains less elaborate lighting and landscaping and does not
include enhanced paving or major monumentation buildings and walls.. Center entry
medians are optional in Minor Project Entries. (See Figures III-24 and III-25.)
• No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways will be permitted
within the MWD easement. All roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD
prior to the beginning of construction.
d* Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-98
J
a J
a
H H
~ H ~ Q FF'.W
W Z Z ~ ~Z
} ~ ~ } p~
~+ v>
w w ~
¢ M ~ w ~
c7 ~n
w
_ w,
~° a
~ w
z ~
Fo
~
~ c~ ~. a
' a :c~
as
z
~ =
~
U a
~ ~
>>
~ rs
z
~ x
~ ~~
>
~ . Q .
DO ~Q
~ >
~
p ~
a ~ ~ o~.N ~ :~u~
h :N°wl
tO CD N
J
Q
F
2
~
W
;~ ~ Z - ~ ~~
~~ °` ~~
}
I- ~ }
~ ° }
~~ ~
~ ~~
w
'O
oc~ a
W
D ~Z
W
Q = ~~ ~ _ a
~o
z C3
z` U
as
~ ~ry
~ V U
as
Z '~ a »p g ?a ~00
a
J Q
.w O (] 0
.-~.~
N
~
a
J
r
f0
t0 N aD
N I
a ~ : ~_
~ I
m ~ci ,~ .
a g <c; m ~ ~
F
~, ;~~ ~~.
i.
.~:.
\' ..} :<
w
U ~_.__.._~. ~
!A, P _
Ill \.____,.. ;......
0 ~.
~~~
~3 ; ,~
,. - _._
w
-~ U
a
w
J
m_
G
~ .C
~ M
o
~
N
! 0
~
~
~S
V
~ .
W
~ ~ ~ G
}
W ~,
N
W ^'+
O
a~
¢ ~,
OLL
°'
~~
b
j .~a~~
i_.
ILtY
~1J N
I-' =
Wa
~ N
O=_
ad
¢m
g~
z~,~,
E~
~~
,a ~ ~h ~ ~
_. ~
~ Z N
~g m
w ~
~ LL
0
vQv
.d
~~
Margarita Village Ill[. project ICDevelopment flan
33. l~ll~imann>mg ~>rea 34
a. IIDescriutive Summary
Planning Area 34 in Village "A," as shown in Figure II-29, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 100.dwelling units aze planned at a
target density of approximately 6.8 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area
will be designated.for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately
14.7 acres. Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are depicted in Section
III.C.2.
b. ]Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access into Planning Area,34 will be provided from Ia Serena Way. (See
Figure II-29J
• No permanent stmctures or buildings of any sort other than roadways will be permitted
within the MWD easement. All roadways must be reviewed and approved by the MWD
prior to the beginning of construction.
:• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• The length to width ratio for single family lots may exceed 2:1, but shall not exceed a
maximum ratio of 4.2:1.
• The maximum ratio of floor azea to lot azea shall not be greater than two to one (2:1),
not including basement floor azea.
• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 34, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-100
Margarita Village ID[. 1Project IfDevelopment ]Plan
34~. ]Pll~nn>inn>mg ~re~ 35
a. Descriptive Summary
Planning Area 35 in Village "A," as shown in Figure II-29, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 356 dwelling units aze planned at a
tazget density of approximately 5.5 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area
will be designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately
66.1 acres. Typical building'elevations and azchitectural guidelines are depicted in Section
III.C.2.
b. band Use and Development Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
:• Access into Planning Area 34 will be provided by a local access road from Rancho
California Road. This road will run through Planning Areas 35 and 33, eventually
connecting with Mazgarita Road to the west. (See Figure II-29.)
• A 30-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement and an MWD easement run
adjacent to the western edge of Planning Area 36 in a north-south direction. (See
Figure II-29.)
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 35, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
l
q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-101
Margarita Village . ~. ]Project ][Development flan
35. lPllannrrn>mg Area 3~
a. Descriptive Summary
Planning Area 36 in Village. "A," as illustrated in Figure II-29, shall contain solely Medium
High Density.Residential housing. A maximum of 62 dwelling units are planned at a tazget
density of approximately 8.0 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area will be
designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately 7.5 acres.
Typical,building elevations and architectural guidelines aze depicted in Section III.C.2.
b. II,and Use and IIDevelopment Standards ,
Please refer to .Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific PIan,Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
:• Access into Planning Area 36 will be provided by a local access road from Rancho
California Road. This road will run through Planning Areas 35 and 33, eventually
connecting with Margarita Road to the west. (See Figure II-29.)
• A 30-foot wide Southern Califomia'Edison (SCE) easement and an MWD easement run
O adjacent to the western edge of Planning Area 36 in a north-south direction. (See
Figure II-29 J
v* Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• The maximum ratio of floor azea to lot azea shall not be greater than two to one (2:1),
not including basement floor area.
:• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 36, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-102
Margarita Village . • : ID[. ]Project jDevelopment.IPlan
3~. lPll~nn><an>mg ~r~~ 39
a. IIDescriptive Summary
,~
Planning Area 37 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-30, shall contain solely Medium
Density Residential' housing. A maximum of 10T dwelling' units are'planned at a tazget
density of approximately 4.6 du/ac (Density Range 2-5 du/ac). This Planning Area will be
` designated for Medium Density' Residential development on approximately 23.7 acres.
` Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are depicted in Section ]II.C.2.
b. Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards'
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ~lannint= Standards
•R Access into Planning Area 37 will be provided by a local access road running between
Rancho California Road and La Serena Way;
•, A major recreation and activity center is planned in Village "A," adjacent to Planning
Area 37, to serve Village "A" residents. A variety of facilities aze planned; the center
may include tennis courts, a swimming pool, and other recreational facilities.
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 37, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
•'r Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-103
a
J
Q
Z
iO ~ g ~ ~ W
~ {L
~
em
~ (7
~Z
Z
t7
T' f
..
() ~
M Z L
11 }~
~ }
W ~
~ 0 F
-
~
2 .fA
.2 .
~H 0 W
~ _ t
q
¢ Z
~
o:
a a
cas= W
~o
z ~ a >j3 z~ as
Z r ~ ~~ ~
Z p M ~ ~ ~
g W
~ m N
~ 5
~
°
°
a f. a o
,~.v N a
N r
~~n
~~
J.
W
U
Q
0
~~
U-
w "'
~ N
N
a~
¢~
O~
z„
~~
J
Q
H
Z
W
W W
Q ~ C!S
ZZ
cZ 0~
w
~_ ¢z
acs ~o
~_
z~ as
4Z4~aooo
.J w O ~ p aD
a~vrui~n
~
pp
ppp
ICI
~
9
6
w ~ M
LL ~ M
O
...
Cb
0
Q ~
v Q.v
.d
~~
O~' ~'':,
~.~~,
Margarita Village ~. project Development plan
3'~. pHannrmn>iflg Area 3~
a. 1Descrintive Summary
Planning Area 38 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-30, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 181 dwelling units aze planned at a
target density of approximately 6.2 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area
will be designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately
29.3 acres. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines are depicted in Section
IILC.2.
b. ]Land IIJse and IIDeveloument Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. 1'lannine Standards
:• Access into Planning Area 38 will be provided from a local access road running
between Planning Areas 38 and 40.
a
• A minor recreation lot is planned in Planning Area 38. A variety of facilities are
planned; recreation opportunities may include open turf areas, picnic tables and other
recreational facilities.
• A major recreation and activity center is planned in Village "A," adjacent to Planning
Area 37. A variety of facilities are planned; the center may include tennis courts, a
swimming pool, and other recreational facilities.
:• A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is planned along Meadows Pazkway. (See
Figures III-24 & III-25.)
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• The length to width ratio for single family lots may exceed 2:1, but shall not exceed a
maximum ratio of 2.9:1.
•: Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 38, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout.
:• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-105
1[lI. ]Project ][Development ]Plan
a 3~. ~Il~»»>mg ~>re~ ~~
This Planning Area was deleted.
a
c~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-106
Margarita Village : ~. project ~evelopment.IPlan
3~. l~flannrmnng area 4®
a. IIDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 40 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-30, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 198 dwelling units aze planned at a
target density of approximately 5.0 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area
will. be designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately
30.5 acres. Typical building elevations and architectural guidelines are depicted in Section
III.C.2.
b. )[.and Use and YDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Plannine Standards
• Access into Planning Area 40 will be provided from Meadows Parkway and a local
access road to the south. (See Figure II-30.)
• A major recreation and activity center is planned in Village "A," adjacent to Planning
Area 37. A variety of facilities are planned; the center may include tennis courts, a
swimming pool, and other recreational facilities.
:• A minor recreation lot is planned in Planning Area 40. A variety of facilities are
planned; recreation opportunities may include open turf areas and picnic tables.
•r A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is planned along Meadows Parkway. A
Minor Project Entry is a simplified version of a Major Project Entry; it contains less
elaborate lighting and landscaping does not include enhanced paving or major
monumentation buildings and walls. Center entry medians are optional in Minor
Project Entries. (See Figures III-24 and III-25.)
•A Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
The length to width ratio for single family lots may exceed 2:1, but shall not exceed a
maximum ratio of 3.6:1.
• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 40, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standards that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-107
Margarita Village ~. lProject Development II~lan
44®. l~fla>mmn>mg ~>rea 4Il
a. YDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 42 in Village "A," as illustrated in Fiomue II-31, shall contain solely Medium
High Density Residential housing: A maximum of 83 dwelling units are planned at a tazget
density of approximately5.7 du/ac (Density Range 5-8 du/ac). This Planning Area will be
designated for Medium High Density Residential development on approximately 15.2 acres.
Typical building elevations and azchiteetural guidelines aze depicted in Section III.C.2.
b. g.and tJse and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. Planning Standards
• Primary access into Planning Area 41 will be provided from a Village "A" access road
which connects to Ia Serena Way. (See Figure II-31.)
:• Planning Area 41 is surrounded by the golf course to the north, east, and west.
6• No structures will be placed on the MWD easement to the south.
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40.feet.
• The length to width ratio for single family lots may exceed 2:1, but shall not exceed a
maximum ratio of 2.5:1.
:• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 41, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
-,
y
r
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-108
J
a
H
W
p
~
~
W
~
~ u5
W Z
F p ~-
a, ~
u77 W
~
, ~
p
wz.
w o
= Q
H p
(a7 ~
=
Q U
Q
Z ~
W Nip ~ co
m
r
p p~p
V
Q W'
W ~Z
SZn
a w ~~
O f 1I~
.Z' U Fa- U. ~ ~ ~ ~V
W U
Z'p o~Q~ W
__ g ~ ~°o° = J 9-=
co LL
N
y
W
U
Q
~ a
a a
w w
oc
a a
c~ c~
z z
Ya
,~
Z
'` Y
Z
a
Q
. .. JQ Q
a
Q
JQN
nj
1" .. aa.- aarn
,~
`,
J
Q
p ~W
W W 2 O
c7~ p~ ~`a"..
v
W ~ ~ (n
~ U
(7 p Q p
2~ QQ
Z p N p p 0
a W ~ (O In
d ~ 'Md' N V N -.
~~-:
r.., ,
,e
`.
`':~`
i,
I ~ '~\ ~ ~~
~ ~ i ~~ ~
I~ ~
~ -.
LL ~
0
a¢v
.d
co ~~
. Margarita-Village . ~. lProject l[DevelopmentlPlan
4~]l.
IPIl~>m>rnn>mg Ares 41B
a.
b.
c.
IDescriutive Summary
Planning Area 42 in Village "A,". as illustrated in Figure~II:31; shall contain solely 114edi~
High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 175 dwelling units aze planned at a
tazget density of approximately 12.0 du/ac (Density Range 8-12 du/ac). This Planning Area
will be designated for High Density Residential development on approximately 14.6 acres.
Product .types may include multi-family townhomes or single family detached units.
Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines aze depicted in Section III.C.2.
Land Use and IIDevelotiment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
Planning Standards
•:~ Primary access into Planning Area 42 will be provided from a Village "A" access road
which- connects to La Serena Way. Additional access may be available through
Planning Area 41. (See Figure II-31.)
• Golf Course land use is located to the south of the Planning Area.
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 42, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-110
Margarita Village ~. IProject ][Development ]Plan
~2. ]PIla>m><nn>mg ~>r~~ 4!3 -
a. IDescrintive Summary ..
Planning Area 43 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-31, shall contain solely Medium
~.~ High Density Residential housing. A maximum of 200 dwelling units aze planned at a
tazget density of approximately 4.6 du/ac (Density Range of 2-5 du/ac). This Planning Area
will be designated for Medium-High Density Residential development on approximately
43.2 acres. Typical building elevations and azchitectural guidelines are depicted in Section
- III.C.2.
b. ]Land Use and DeveloumenYStandards~
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. ]Plannine Standards
• Primary access into Planning Area 43 will be provided from La Serena Way.
Additional access may be available through Planning Area 41. (See Figure II-31.)
•S A Minor Project Entry landscape treatment is proposed at the entrance to Planning Area
43 on Ia Serena Way. Minor Project Entries aze simplified versions of Major Project ;
Entries and contain less elaborate lighting and landscaping and do not include enhanced
paving or maor monumentation buildings and walls. Center entry medians are optional
in Minor Project Entries. (See Figures III-24 and III-25.)
•` A 30-foot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement and an MWD easement run
adjacent to the western edge of Planning Area 44 in a north-south direction. (See
Figure II-31.)
• Building height shall not exceed three (3) stories, with a maximum height of 40 feet.
• The length to width ratio for single family lots amy exceed 2:1, but shall not exceed a
maximum ratio of 4.6:1.
v Prior to issuance of building permits for Planning Area 43, the City shall review and
approve the housing product(s) proposed and the site plan layout
•3 Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standards in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. Z Page II-111
Margarita Village ]Il[. ]Project ][Development IPlan
O
4~3. lP~a>rn>runang ~lr~a ~~
a. HDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 44 in Village "A," as illustrated in Figure II-31; is planned as a 12.5-acre
public pazk.; The actual size of the pazk will be determined when subdivision maps aze
submitted for the individual Planning Areas within Village "A". If the number of units
achieved is less than the number allowed by this Specific Plan, then the pazk acreage may
be reduced by a commensurate amount based on the City's park requirement formulas. It
is expected that the park will be oriented toward active uses and, as such, may contain
baseballlsoftball and. soccer.fields. The actual layout of the public pazk will require review
and approval by the Temecula Community Services District.
b. ]Land tJse and YDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. .Planning Standards
• Access into the park may be provided from La Serena Way and Meadows Parkway.
(See Figure II=31)
d• Pazk improvement plans for this site shall be submitted and approved in conjunction
with the submittal:of the first tract map for adjacent Planning Area 43.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-112
Margarita Village ID[. lProject ][Development lPlan
464. ]~Ila>r>i>mn>igg ~>rea 45
a. IIDescriptive Summary
Planning Area 45 in Village .."A," as illustrated in Figure II-31, is constructed as a 9.2 acre
• . public pazk: Planning Area 45 provides both active and passive uses to the Village "A"
residents.
b. Land ~Jse and IIDevelonment Standards.
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.)
c. lPlannins Standards
• Access into the pazk may be provided from a local street off of La Serena Way. (See
Figure II-31,)
•b The park has already been constructed and dedicated to the Temecula Cornmuuity
Services District.
• Please see Figure III-17, Village "A": Conceptual Landscape Plan, for the relationship
between Planning Area 45 and the remainder of Village "A."
•> An MWD easement runs in a north-south direction through Planning Area 45. No
permanent structures or buildings of any sort other than roadways and pazking azeas
shall be permitted within the MWD easement. All roadways and paved azeas must be
reviewed and approved by the MWD prior to the beginning of construction.
d• A 3afoot wide Southern California Edison (SCE) easement serves as the boundary
between Planning Areas 44 and 45. (See Figure II-31.)
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
~~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-113
Margarita Village ID[. IE'roject development llPllan
4~5. l~ll~>rnnnn>mg ~re~ 4~
a. IDescrintive Summary
Planning Area 46, as depicted in Figure II-32, will be devoted to 141.0 acres of Golf
Course, offering recreational opportunities and scenic vistas for residents of Village "A."
b. Land Use and IIDevelonment Standards
Please refer to Ordinance No. 348.2922. (See Specific Plan Zone Ordinance Tab.}
c. Plannine Standards
•} An MWD easement runs in a north-south direction through Planning Area 46, and is
included in golf course uses. No permanent structures or buildings of any sort other
than roadways and pazking areas shall be permitted within the MWD easement. All
roadways and paved azeas must be reviewed and approved by the MVdD prior to the
beginning of construction.
• A major recreation and activity center is planned in Village "A," adjacent to Planning
Area 37, to serve Village "A" residents. A variety of facilities aze planned; the center
may include tennis courts, a swimming pool, and other recreational facilities.
• Please refer to Project-Wide Design and Textual Development Standazds in Section
II.B.2., for further land use standazds that apply site-wide.
:• Please refer to Design Guidelines in Section III, for design-related criteria.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 2 Page II-114
.o
a
W W
(~~~
~ O
U U
4
~
a~ o
v
4' C7 .-
Z
O
H
W
2 ¢
UW
w F-
°G w
WU
y >-
a>_
¢~U
a¢
_~
('J
M
W
LL
~.
G
Q ~
0
v ¢,v
.d
w
u.
= W
~?
u- J
W H
N ~
00
~~
W
~Z
LL .J
D}
W ~-
OW
as
00
as
Q Q
w w
Q Q
z Z
00
~Q
oW
U~
~U
~~
~~
OO
O
m 0
U~
0
Q°
~~
~5
Z~
O~
Uo~
VhN
N
z °
Z`7
Z~'-
L G
. ~
M
av~
~°
m "'
~.} Q
I~
d
1
Margarita Village ~~. design guidelines
O ~~~o ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
A. IPCTRP®SE AND l[N PENS'
This Section of the Specific Plan provides guidelines and standazds on azchitecture, landscaping, entry
monumentation, and streetscapes, as well as community elements such as signage.
These guidelines and standards are intended as a reference tool for builders, designers, planners, and
developers. The design guidelines contained in this document will ensure that all development within
MARGARITA VILLAGE will be of a consistent and a high quality nature. More specifically, the purpose of
these Design Guidelines is:
n To provide the City of Temecula with the necessary assurance that the MARGARTfA
VILLAGE Specific Plan azea will develop in accordance with the quality and chazacter
proposed herein;
c To provide guidance to developers, builders, engineers, azchitects, landscape azchitecu, and
other professionals in order to maintain the desired design quality;
o To provide guidance to City staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council in the
review of future development projects in the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan area;
! c To provide guidance in the formulation of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for the
use of land in the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan azea;
n To provide guidance in the formulation of concise development guidelines for the various
planning areas and villages within the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan boundaries; and
c To provide strong direction for design within MARGARITA VILLAGE by setting distinct
azchitectural and landscape azchitectural themes and motifs.
The Design Guidelines provided herein are intended as a living document. They are subject to modification
over time so as to allow for response to unanticipated conditions, such as changes in taste, community
desires and the mazketplace, as well as amendments to the Specific Plan itself.
]~. ~~ "VIDL1[.A(iES99 ~®NCEPT
In developing these Design Guidelines, cazeful thought has been given to integrate the structural and
aesthetic elements of a balanced, diverse community. To ensure that these guidelines and the Specific Plan
aze implemented as intended, the overall Specific Plan project azea has been divided into three azeas to be
known herein as "villages: ' (See Figure III-1, Village Concept Plan.)
Village "A" is located northwest of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway.
Village "B" is located to the northeast of Village "A." Finally, Village "C" is located to the south of
Rancho California Road. Villages `B" and "C" aze proposed as typical single-family subdivisions. Village
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-1
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
"A" is planned as arecreation-oriented community containing a variety of housing types and densities
organized around a central 18-hole golf course facility.. ~ ~
It is expected that each village will develop its own chazacter and ambiance. Furthermore, it is intended
that each village theme be expressed in coordination with the project setting, which serves as a basis around
which key elements of the community can be developed.
~. pillage cuss
Village "A" is proposed as an optionally gated neighborhood containing approximately 1;546
attached and detached dwelling units. An 18-hole golf course will contain a clubhouse and several
lakes and watercourses. Village "A" will also include a 12.5-acre community park. In conceiving
a design theme for Village "A", an eazly California Spanish theme has been selected. All
landscaping, paving, and azchitecture should strongly reflect this motif.
2. pillage 6~"
Village `B" will contain 610 single family detached dwellings. The various communities within
Village "B" will also include very low to medium-low density housing. Also included in this
Village is an 11.5-acre community pazk and various manufactured slopes and greenbelts. In
addition, an elementary school is planned on 13 acres just north of La Serena Way. The basic
azchitectural theme is one that blends Spanish, Mediterranean and French manor styles.
3. pillage ss~»
A 6.2-acre commercial center is proposed in Village "C" at the southeast corner of the intersection
of Rancho California Road and Meadows Pazkway and will include neighborhood retail commercial
uses. Village "C" will include a combined elementary school and pazk on 14.3 acres, an 11-acre
school administration center, a church on a 5.3-acre pazcel, and a 5-acre site for a post office.
Approximately 1,770 dwelling units are proposed in Village "C".
The intent in Village "C" has been to establish an environment that responds to existing surrounding
ranch and equestrian communities as the area becomes increasingly urbanized. For this reason,
Village "C" should reflect or draw upon a "traditional California" theme. This theme should reflect
the character of Waal California and be reflected in the azchitecture, signage, landscaping, and entry
treatments within the Village.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-2
t
I
W
~
c
c
~ G
~ C
® `
V
L~
~: C
~', ~
M
~+
~„
0
vcv
~~
Margarita Village ][l[][. l[Design Qsuidelines
a ~. [~RCI~I'd'EC~'YJRA~ ~iJ~EI.INI:S
The guidelines and standards contained in this portion of the Specific Plan set forth the basic architectural
character and design theme of each village within the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan community.
Development within all areas of MARGARITA VILLAGE should comply with the following guidelines.
It is the intent of these guidelines to comply with the City of Temecula zoning regulations, as well as to
provide a flexible framework within which to design this project. The major objective is to encourage good
architectural design, while also permitting the builder or developer flexibility to design a residential
neighborhood, commercial center or public facility with its own unique identity and design integrity.
ll. community-amide architectural guidelines and standards
a. Residential Criteria: Sinele-family.lDetached IDwellint=_s
The following requirements and standards apply to all single-family, detached dwelling units:
Each residential project area should convey its own blend of building formats and styles.
Variety and creativity are particularly encouraged in the Very Low Density Residential areas, where
it is anticipated that Custom homes may be constructed. Even so, mass and scale should be
appropriate to the site in all cases.
• One particular product type should not dominate an any one village, but rather an environment
should be created that integrates building designs and housing densities while giving each village
its own character.
• The architectural character of each planning area should be perceived from the street and visual
interest should be created through constancy of architectural elements, such as windows, doors,
balconies, and roofs.
• Pitch and form of roofs are visible features which can add impact to a streetscape. Various roof
designs may be employed, but flat roof areas are to be limited and screened from view.
•: Roof overhangs are encouraged as a response to climatic conditions, especially when used in
combination with porch enclosures, balconies, and recesses.
An emphasis should be given to creating dwelling units with a strong indoor/outdoor
relationship.
:• All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by walls or fences similar in design to
the building azchitecture or by landscaping adequate in size to provide proper screening.
• All roofing materials shall be of a fire retardant material such as concrete tile. Wooden roofs
are prohibited in the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan azea.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-4
~. Design Qsuidelines
• The level of on-site lighting as well as lighting fixtures, shall comply with any and all applicable
requirements and policies of the City of Temecula and Mount Palomaz Observatory. Energy l
conservation, safety, and security should be emphasized when designing any lighting system.
b. Residential Criteria: Multi-]Family/Attached dwellings
The following requirements and standazds apply to all multi-family and attached dwelling units:
• As with a single family dwellings, the architectural chazacter of each planning azea should be
perceived from the street. Visual interest shall be created through the use of azchitectural elements
such as windows, doors, balconies, and roofs.
•:~ Buildings should be appropriate in mass and scale to the site on which they are placed.
• Building mass is probably the most prominent design feature of a project. Multi-family
residential structures should incorporate offsets and projections to avoid a monotonous, "barrack-
like" facade.
• Interesting building massing can be achieved without superficial design elements through use
of several features. For example, two and three story structures may be combined with.one-story
structures or elements. Also, stuctures can employ projected balconies, recessed porches, entries,
and enclosures.
• The pitch and form of roofs aze a very visible community feature. A range of roof forms and ~^~!
pitches can add an appealing visual impact to the community/streetscape. Although roof designs
and styles may vary, flat roofs aze to be limited and screened from view.
• All mechanical equipment shall be screened from the view of passing motorists on surrounding
roadways either with a wall similaz in design to the project azchitecture or a planting space adequate
in size to proper screening.
3 All parking carports and gazages, whether freestanding or not, should incorporate the same
design elements and materials as the dwelling units whenever possible.
•~ The roofing materials used for all residential communities shall be of a fire retazdant material
such as concrete tile. Wooden roofs aze not permitted in MARGARITA VILLAGE due to fire hazazd.
• The level of on-site lighting, as well as lighting fixtures, shall comply with any and all
applicable requirements and policies of the Ciry of Temecula and Mount Palomaz Observatory.
Energy conservation, safety, and security should be emphasized when designating any lighting
system.
c. RetaiUOffice Commercial Structures and public Buildings
The following guidelines should be used in the design of retaiUoffice commercial structures and
other public buildings:
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-5
~. lfDesien guidelines
a The azchitectural design of any re[aiUoffice commercial development or public facility should
reflect the appropriate village or community theme.
• The azchitecture should contain significant elements relating the structure to the human scale
• Buildings with facades parallel to the street aze highly encouraged; however, long unarticulated
facades and roof forms should be avoided.
• Use of attractive, durable, high quality, weather resistant materials should be required for all
visible and/or weather exposed surfaces on building exteriors.
:• Integrally colored inorganic materials, such as brick, coricrete, stone, copper, core-ten steel, and
anodized aluminum aze encouraged.
• Subdued colors such as sofr pastels, earth tones, and various shades of white are encouraged on
retaiUoffice commercial buildings and other public structures.
• Bright vibrant colors and primary colors should not be permitted except as limited azchitectural
accents (i.e. painted or rile bands).
• Reflective or mirrored glass is strongly discouraged except where used on a minimal basis as
an accent.
•: Temporary modulaz buildings such as portable buildings or mobile homes and metal system
buildings such as Butler Buildings aze prohibited in all areas of Mazgarita Village, except for the
golf course in Village "A". Metal system buildings shall be permitted for use as maintenance
buildings for the golf course. Temporary site trailers associated with on-site construction activity
aze permissible during construction.
• All parking required for employees, clients, customers, or any others related to an enterprise
shall be provided on site, unless otherwise provided by a reciprocal parking agreement.
S• Loading docks, staging azeas, and transformers shall be screened from public streets.
:• Trash enclosures and bins, transformers, processing equipment and other unsightly appaza[us
shall be situated away from the street and should be azchitecturally screened.
• All roof equipment shall be enclosed in a penthouse or otherwise screened as to not be visible
from a public street or right-of-way.
:• The level of on-site lighting as well as lighting fixtures, shall comply with any and all applicable
requirements and policies of the City of Temecula and Mount Palomar Observatory. Energy
conservation, safety, and security should be emphasized when designing any lighting system.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-6
Margarita Village ~. l~Design Quidelines
2. Village "A" Architectural Guidelines
a. IIntroduction
Village "A" will contain a variety of azchitectural product types that may include both attached and
detached dwellings. Both single-family and multi-family residences will be available. The overall
azchitectural motif for Village "A" will be eazly California Spanish.
b. Buildine Mass, Form, and Scale
Whenever possible, incorporate the following elements into buildings and structures in Village "A":
•> Use simple and bold rectangulaz forms. Extremely articulated structures aze unnecessary and
should be avoided.
• Break up wall planes with projections and recesses in building walls to provide shadow and
depth, particulazly azound windows and doors.
• Break up lazge expanses of roofs with dormer windows, chimneys, and skylights.
• Combine one and two story building forms to enhance visual variety and a sense of human
scale. This is especially appropriate with attached dwelling units such as duplexes and townhouses.
•? Avoid lazge expanses of flat, unarticulated wall planes on either vertical or horizontal walls.
c. Materials and Colors
The form of structures will be enhanced using different building materials, surface textures, and
colors.
•9 Primary exterior materials should be limited to plaster or stucco in most cases. Limited areas
of wood aze permitted.
:• .Plaster and stucco surfaces should be finished with a smooth, sand or light lace finish texture.
Do not use heavy-textured or heavy trowel finishes.
•S Tile, brick, stone, and masonry aze permitted as accent materials.
• Use colorful terra cotta and ceramic tiles for paving or decorative wall accents.
•:* Use dazkly-colored or brightly-colored bands as accent trim-especially azound doors and
windows.
ca
~J
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-7
~~
1
-> ,
ti ~ ,
" i
y°
~,r ` y ~ ~,
NOTE:
THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOTINTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES.
~a 0~
f A.
~,. •.
I r~~~Z i r.
_~ ~~, ~
I
~~
li
~`
i~
(N
FIGURE III-2
VILLAGE "A": TYPICAL ELEVATIONS.
~ ~~~~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~~
r., o
O
c~
7
0
NOTE:
THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES.
FIGURE III-3
VILLAGE "A":TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~!/ ~~'~c~l~'Il{~c~l ~Il~~~1~C~
III-9
~~nn„ ,~i
Margarita Village ~. llDesign Qyuidelines
O :• Avoid using building materials such as vinyl or aluminum siding. Wood or masonite siding
(especially rough sawn siding;) brick, or masonry shall be used as minor accent elements.
• The following colors aze encouraged in Village "A":
• Stucco colors of white tints to light and medium value earthy tones. These include, but aze
not limited to ,white, cream, coconut, ivory, beige, tan and taupe.
• Fascia and trim colors with appropriate value contrast to stucco colors including, but not
limited to, white family trims occurring on medium value stucco colors and medium to dazker
value earth based trims occurring on light to white stucco colors.
:• The following accent colors aze also permitted, but should be used sparingly: indigo blue,
hunter green, teal, burgundy, rust, and black.
•? Roof colors should include but aze not limited to earthy browns, earthy greens, terra cotta, and
various shades of reds and red-browns. Gray and slate-colored roof tiles are discouraged.
:• Roofs need not be monochromatic, but may include a combination of several different, but
compatible colors.
d. hoof Structures
Use the following guidelines in designing and selecting roof forms and materials:
• Gable and hip roof forms aze strongly encouraged and every attempt should be made to include
several different roof forms and pitches into each structure.
• Roof pitches should be shallow to moderate (4:12 to 6:12).
• Use dormer windows, chimneys, and skylights to break up lazge expanses of roof.
S• Short roof overhangs aze encouraged with simple plaster fascias.
•3 Exposed rafter tails are permitted.
• Create interesting jogs in rooflines, as well as varying plate and ridge heights.
•: Shed roofs are permitted in limited quantities.
• Avoid using gambrel, mansazd, and other similaz roof types.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-10
Q
I '
,. ~
r%`,`~ .fn
~~
it
I M~
'~ '~
~~
Y
I ~ µ'
,~
r 3
D7~ ii
~y,I ~~vfT~ ` _
"!~ G7/
~/
AMAM9M111 ~~• "dd44
NOTE:
THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND ~ FIGURE III-4
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURALPRODUCTTYPES. ~ VILLAGE ~~A~~:.
TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS; ROOF DETAILS
~a o~ ~~~~~r~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
Margarita Village ~. llDesign
YO.
e. Windows and -Doors
•S Use accent trim and tle azound doors and windows, where appropriate.
• Divided window lights are encouraged.
•:~ Use colorful accent frames azound windows.
• Doors'and windows should consist of rectangulaz and azched openings.
•~ Wooden latices may be used in limited quantifies: They are especially appropriate when used
on the sides of carport structures and covered with vines to screen automobiles.
~A Brighfiy colored canvas awnings are permitted over doors and wiridows. Avoid using reflecive
glass or metal- awnings.
f. ArcluCecturalIIDetails
• Ceramic and terra cotta files and colored bands should be used as azchitectural accents.
• Exterior wood trim should either be painted, stained, or covered with stucco.
4
• Balcony and stair railings shall be solid, wood, or wrought iron (tubular steel). -When wood or
wrought iron is used, posts and caps should be of substanfial size to have strong visual impact.
• Accent trim caps or file bandings aze encouraged on balcony and stair railways. Stair railways
may be stepped to create planing walls and shelves.
• Construct plant shelves and low walls underneath dramafic window treatments.
•v Squaze or cylindrical plaster columns aze strongly encouraged. Wood posts; if substanfial in
size, aze also encouraged. Tile or painted bandings are appropriate on columns.
:• Exposed flues on chimneys are prohibited.
g. Patio Covers
~:• Paio covers that are open on three sides may encroach into the reaz yazd setback leaving a
minimum five (5) foot setback from face of post to reaz property line. Paio cover eaves may
overhang from the post a maximum of two (2) feet, leaving a cleaz space of three (3) feet
minimum.
Jam/
.Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-12
iVYaz azita Village III. Design Guidelines
4• ~nIlIl~g~ 6699 A>r~llnn>t~~ttnn>r~ll ~aunall~lln>ma'~ ®A>i><n~>la~>i$aeit><tr 0
ftT®. 7, A~p>rnl ~00,~
a. 1<ntroduction
Village "B" shall contain two basic azchitectural motifs and a third custom azea adjacent to the
Vineyards on the eastern boundary of the property. Because the two neighborhoods will
comprise the majority of Village "B", these guidelines will predominantly address those azeas.
The basic azchitectural theme for Village "B" will be Spanish, Mediterranean, and French
Manor. Planning Areas 2, 3 8, and 10/11/12 will have a combination of Mediterranean and
French elevation styles. Planning Areas 4 and 6 will have a combination of Spanish and
Mediterranean elevations. This is a natural combination of styles for the Rancho California
azea and will provide a variety of elevations as well as giving each development azea a separate
character. The Mediterranean style will provide the blend between the various planning azeas
and the Spanish and French will provide the necessary agent to keep the visual interest within
the projects. All design elements used in Village "B" should work together to achieve a sense
of neighborhood identify.
b. Buildinss 1Vdass.lForm and Scale
Village "B" shall include a range of dwelling units sizes in proportion to the size of the O
project. There shall also be a variety of elevation types per plan throughout the project.
A sense of neighborhood will be accomplished by manipulating the building mass, form
and scale within each planning azea:
:• The homes in' Planning Areas 2, 3, 8 and 10/11/21 shall range in size from 1,500 sq.
ft. to approximately 2,600 sq. ft. and a minimum for five (5) floor plans shall be
provided.
• The homes in Planning Areas 4 and 6 shall range in size from 1,200 sq. ft. to
approximately 2,100 sq. ft. with a minimum of five (5) floor plans.
• The Custom homes in Planning Area 9A shall have a minimum of 2500-1;88~sq. ft.
of living azea. The homes in Plannine Area 9A shall be one story and
strateeically placed to allow view corridors for the existine residences to the
west.
• The homes in Plannine Area 7 shall have a minimum of 2.200 sp ft of livine
area.
Specific Plan, No. 3, Amendment No. 7 Page III-
~ ~/ ,..
-~'m~~ ~
_- ~ -
.,
~~ ~
~o
W
~ ~m< 'nI
LL ~II
...~...
1
~`~ .~`
--~.~``
~_
.a
I-
~~~
`I ~
~~-'~ (~
~`
a e b
d
~ ~ Qo
!!l~~~ ~ ~ v e.v
.d
a n
' I ,. .- ~~~JJJ Icy. ~.1~ ~ ~~~c~,.
~; I ~ ~I ~ w ~ I I ,~~ ~{ r, ryh. ~ ~' ~I r 9 n ~~ ~I l ~ A .~ f _
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES. FIGURE IlT-6
VILLAGE 'B° :TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~a p, ~ ~~r~~~~n~~ VIlIlIl~~c~
~.`
'III-~ 5
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES.
FIGURE' Ill-7
VILLAGE "B° :TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~a q ~~r~~~~~~~ ~~IlIl~~c~
TT/ i c
- ~ ~" ~
-__ ° _ __
i ~~
...-. _
c
FIGURE Ul-8
_.
~a ~~
VILLAGE 'B" :TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~~~~~~n~~ ~nIlIl~~c~
~/
III-] 7
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES.
Q
a
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND ~ FIGURE III-9
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES. VILLAGE B" :TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
\~`
Trr_i u
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
a c. Materials and Colors
The form of the structures will be enhanced using different building materials, surface textures, and
colors:
:• Textured stucco over azchitectural projections and' pop-outs on front elevations, with limited
amounts of flat wall planes articulated by material or colors is permitted;
• Incorporate bold projections and recesses into the architecture;
• Use rough-sawn wood fascias and trim (including lintels and surrounds) at doors and windows;
and,
:• Use earthtone paints and stains to compliment architectural styles.
d. Roof Structures
Use the following guidelines in designing and selecting roof forms and materials:
• Roof form geometry should be simple with the minimum amount of breaking ridge planes;
N • Combinations of hips and gables will be necessary in many cases;
(~. J\ :• Roof pitch should be low to moderate approximately 4:12 to 6:12;
v Wide eaves 18 to 24 inch minimum typically with some clipped eaves where the elevation
dictates;
:• Roofing material should be concrete file in a combination of barrel and flat to accent
architectural style;
• Roof colors should vary occasionally from dwelling to dwelling. Color should be integral with
no high gloss glazed surfaces; and,
• Exposed beams should be heavy in appearance and rough sawn to match fascia and trim texture.
e. Windows and Doors
:• Window treatments shall vary between elevations and shall include divided lights on elevation
styles that warrant that treatment
• Round-top, character, greenhouse, and bay windows will be incorporated;
Street elevations will include architectural projections around windows to create strong shadow
lines and to give "thick wall" appearance;
:• Pot shelves are encouraged under windows for Spanish and Mediterranean styles; and,
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-19
][~][.
• Shutters as accent treatment for French styles should be incorporated. a
f. ArchitectaralIDetaiLs
• Chimneys should be considered as part of the overall design and be consistent with the elevation
design. Raised stucco forms at chimney caps will be used;
• Second story balconies with wood rails incorporated into architecture; and,
• Garage door trim and style to be appropriate for each elevation.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-20
J
~"'
W
LL
J
Q
U
a
}
F-
0
T
W
'~
V
LL
1
I...
W
Q,
W
O
O
Z
J
Q
U
a
}
H
N
~~'
V
9,~, n
IWI
~J
J °
z
a
W j~
Q
.
d ~,, ~
O Ua
Z
o r
AI II
~-~I
~ WWw
~ acwa
a~~
J
Q wW
Q~U `
o a ~ p
U
d aoo
o c ~!!
} zwa
~
O Z .~
r
¢ ~
w
NZO ~
~Or
~zx V
ww~
~a<
w ~~
o o
z
t?
Ct-
Q ~
v x.>
.d
Margarita Village ~. design Qpuidelines
~. V' IlllIl`cIlg~' 66~ss ~~.~flnn~ec>tunIl~~ll ~unna~~llnIlIl~S
a. Fntroduction
Village "C" will have a "traditional California" azchitectural theme. Buildings and accessory
structures should be visually "low-key". The primary siding material will be wood, either painted,
stained, or rough-sawn and treated with asemi-transparent preservative.
b. Building Mass, &'orm and Scale
Whenever possible, incorporate the following elements into buildings and structures in Village "C":
:• Use simple rectangulaz forms to connect building volumes and to provide azchitectura]
continuity. In addition, the use of angles in floor plans should be limited.
:• Create architectural interest by articulating wall planes (i.e. recessing and projecting walls),
below a continuous horizontal roof line.
• Emphasize horizontal azchitectural lines such as rudge and fascia lines.
• Visually break-up two story elevations with offset stories, changes in materials, or sloping
rooflines.
• Avoid using oblique angles in building plans and elevations.
• Avoid satisfying minimum setback requirements only. Structures of two or more stories should
be setback in excess of the minimum required setbacks whenever possible.
c. Materials and Colors
The form of structures will be enhanced using different building materials,, surface textures, and
colors.
• The following building materials are acceptable:
• Wide, lapped horizontal wood siding--rough-sawn.
• Cedar shingles and commercially available sheet materials--rough-sawn in appeazance ~s
preferred.
• Board and batten.
• Use medium to rough textured stucco at architectural transition points such as corners, second
stories, pop-outs and recesses, etc.
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-22
a
a
~a Q~
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL ANO
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL - FIGURE ~~~-11
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES.
VILLAGE "C"
TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~~1~'~c~1pIl{~c~1 ~Il~~d`1~C~
III-23
a
NOTE: THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES. ~ FIGURE III-12
VILLAGE 'C'
° I.-.r
~a 0~
TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~~p~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~~
~~
111_~a
°W
a ~~
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND FfGURE I!i-13
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES. _ VILLAGE ~C~
TYPICAL ELEVATIONS
~~~~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~;c~
~:~'
III-25
- e ~-,!
a 0~
NOTE THE ILLUSTRATIONS ABOVE ARE CONCEPTUAL AND FIGURE tll-14
ARE NOT INTENDED TO REPRESENT ACTUAL ~ -
ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCT TYPES. ~ VILLAGE ~C~
TYPICRC ELE_VATIONB
~~r~~~r~Il~~ ~IIlIlIl~~~
111-z~
Margarita Village ~. Design Qpuidelines
• Use rough-sawn wood fascia and him elements, including prominent lintels, above gazage
doors, doors, and windows.
• Use masonry as a horizontal element in elevations including partial height walls incorporated
with chimneys, pot shelves, azchitectural banding, special paving, etc.
:• All building elevations should receive some kind of special azchitectutal treatment.
• The list of permitted colors includes semi-transparent stains, earthtone paints, and stains with
selected contemporary accent colors.
3 All colors for opaques paints and stains must be equivalent to those in the Rancho California
Development Company palette.
• Use low contrast trim colors.
• White trim is acceptable except on fascias and comers of buildings.
• Restrict bright accent colors to front doors, window trim, and shutters.
The following list includes materials, textures, and color treatments that aze discouraged on
buildings and structures in Village "C":
Q • Smooth, narrow tongue and grove wood siding.
:• White trim at corners of buildings or fascia to accent geometry.
:• Swirl textured stucco.
•3 Large expanses of flat wall planes not articulated by material or color.
• Non-wood or masonry product siding materials
d• Use of stucco only on any single elevation.
d. Roof Structures
Use the following guidelines as a guide in designing and selecting roof forms and materials.
• Simple roof geometry, emphasizing long, horizontal lines.
• Shallow to moderate roof pitches (4:12 to 6:12).
:• Predominance of side gables with cross gable, hip, or gable on hip forms where appropriate.
• Roof planes may be extended over porches and entries with azeas of shallower pitch (2:12.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-27
][l[I[. ][Design guidelines
Predominance of wide eave overhangs (18"+) especially over windows, with limited application
of clipped eaves (see azchitectural chazacter sketches).
• Exposed rafter trails.
• Exclusive use of flat, shake-like masonry roof tile, rough in appearance, dazk color. Note:
Color must be integral, not a surface glaze.
:• Heavy, protruding beams at overhangs and gable ends.
• Dormers, cupolas, and louvers (at gables).
The list below includes roof types and pitches that are discouraged on buildings in Village "C".
• Moderate eave overhangs (12" - 18").
• Flat roofs on any structure except open trellises or patio covers, not attached to main buildings.
• Complicated roofscapes with numerous intersecting planes and varying pitches.
Exclusive use offront-facing gables on the front of a single unit, especially on two-story plans.
•? Shed roofs.
• Boxed or soffited eaves.
• Asphalt shingles, built-up composition roofing, clay or barrel tile, or any material terra cotta in
color.
e. Windows and dDoors
:• Vary window treatments and window types occasionally. Acceptable window types include
squaze light, conventional slider, character windows, and bay windows.
•: Window frames should be colored, painted, or stained using approved colors per the Rancho
California Development Company palette, white, or dark anodized.
Use pot shelves below windows to add visual interest and color.
•: Use "eyebrows" or partial overhangs above windows.
:• Exterior doors may have decorative and/or glass panels.
:• French doors and decomtive shutters aze encouraged.
:• Windows and window panes should have a horizontal emphasis --use larger proportions in the
horizontal dimension. >
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-28
"v ~. ~%w.. ..
v; '•~
~'1 i~
<~=
Co q
~a ~~
FIGURE Ill-15
VILLAGE "C'
TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS; ROOF DETAILS
~~~~~~Il~~ ~nIl~~~c~
~l.
Iii-~9
a
a
FIGURE III-16.
VILLAGE "C"
°W
~a o~
TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS; WINDOWS/DOOR TREATMENT
~~~~~~Il~~ ~nIlIl~~c~
~ ::.
m-so
Margarita Village l~~ll. design guidelines
d• Avoid building elevations with windows in a lazge expanse of stucco without other architectural
treatment such as wood trim, shutters or rustic facade materials.
:• Avoid exclusive use of conventional aluminum slide windows.
• Avoid using natural aluminum or anodized window frames, other than those permitted.
:• Avoid using plain, undetailed front doors.
• Avoid using windows that create or establish a Spanish or Mediterranean atmosphere.
f. ArchitecturalIIDetails
:• Design covered porches to have shallow pitched canopies and broad roof overhangs.
• When tiling wood as a building material, incorporate substantial posts, timbers, planks, wide
railings, and balusters into the azchitectur.
:• Use decorative porch supports with capitals, wrapped with wood trim, or with turned portions.
• Use covered breezeways to link detached gazages and accessory structures.
• Use wide masonry chimneys or wood-clad chimneys with low-profile caps.
:• Paint rain gutters, flashing, and other azchitectural elemenu and trim constructed of sheet metal
with dazk colors similar to the fascia.
• Garage doors should be of identical or complementary colors, textures, and materials as the
front building elevation.
Avoid stucco chimneys.
Avoid prominent chimney caps.
• Avoid plywood garage doors.
• Avoid using azches and supports that have a Mediterranean or Spanish style.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-31
Margarita Village l[l[I[. ][Design ~vuidelines
ILD. ILAlVIDSCA]PE L~ItCIIITEC~'CTRAL QsUTAELINES
ll. ~»~>r®dlunc~n®>m
a. General Information
The Landscape Architectural Guidelines present the landscape development concept for the
thematic treatment of all commonly maintained project aeeas associated with MARGARITA VILLAGE.
More-over, they present the framework for the landscape treatment of privately maintained
landscape areas as necessary to achieve an overall consistent community wide image.
Section D.S., Miscellaneous Planting Guide, of the Landscape Architectural Guidelines presents
general information relative to seasonal planting constraints, climate constraints and horticultural
soils test requirements, as well as general requirements relative to planting installation, imgation
installation and landscape maintenance:
b. Golf Community Landscaping (Village "A"1
The landscape plays a significant role in establishing Village "A"'s (Temeku Hills) distinctive
character. The project is planned so that it focuses internally maintaining generous setbacks from
arterial roads. These circulation elemendsetback aeeas become the project edges and are utilized
as the visual elements to provide landscape and special thematic treatments. ~
The landscape development concept for Village "A"has three (3) main characteristics. The project
perimeter streetscenes are complementary and reinforcive of the established informal landscape
streetscene character of the surrounding community. A major land use of the interior of the project
is the golf course. As such, it establishes an informal open pazk like chaaacter along the edge of the
surrounding neighborhoods.
A simple consistent palette of plant materials and uniform hardscape materials is utilized
throughout all streetscenes reinforcing a strong sense of project identity. In general, the landscape
palette consists mainly of evergreen plant materials with selected deciduous accent materials that
aze identified with predominantly early California Spanish landscapes and particulazly acclimated
to the Margarita Village weather extremes and soil types.
The hardscape materials reflect a early California Spanish character and anchor the project edges.
Entry monumentation is further addressed in terms of hierarchy or type, location and specific
application of design configuration and landscape treatment.
The landscape architectural guidelines represent the landscape development concept for the
thematic treatment of al] commonly maintained community areas associated with Village "A".
Moreover, they represent the framework for the landscape treatment of privately maintained
landscape areas as necessary to achieve an overall consistent community wide image.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-32
Margarifa Village ll~. design guidelines
This Chapter of the guidelines presents in summary the overall community landscape concept and
plant material palette. General information relative to seasonal planting constraints, climate
constraints and horticultural soils test requirements aze presented to planting installation, irrigation
installation and landscape maintenance azea also contained herein.
The guidelines consist of written summaries and graphic exhibits which address the design
development of specific and typical project areas which, in total, comprise the MARGARITA
VILLAGE community Concept.
Specifically addressed in this Section of the guidelines are streetscene treatments for project
perimeter streets, entry accent treatment, utility easements, recreation amenities, landscape
requirements for single family, multi-family and entry monumentation.
Entry monumentation is addressed in terms of hierarchy or type, location and specific application
of design configuration, materials, signage, lighting and landscape treatment. A project wall
program is presented in terms of wall type, location, design, installation and maintenance
responsibility. This wall program also suggests thematic residential neighborhood wall criteria.
These landscape azchitectural guidelines are intended to complement the architectural and site
planning guidelines and achieve a harmonious, consistent community image.
2. ~n~ll~ge "~" lLa><ndsc~~pn>ng lEgeq~aaare>l>rne>m~
a
a. Project Entry Accent Palms
Washingtonia Robusta or Mexican Fan Palm and Phoenix dactylifer -Date Palm aze the primary
evergreen accent palms. These palms aze utilized in informal backdrop groves at backdrop project
entry monumentation features and within the median islands which identify Village "A".
These trees aze also repeated at significant points throughout the golf community. Such
applications logically include street intersections and changes in street direction where a
reinforcement of the project theme tree will be recognized and will serve a functional purpose.
1) Project Entry Accent Trees:
BOTAMCALNAME
Evergreen Accent Palm Trees
Phoenix dactylifera
Washingtonia robusta
Evergreen Accent Canopy Tree
Pinus halepensis
Schinus molle
COMMON NAME
Date Palm
Mexican Fan Palm
Allepo Pine
California Pepper Tree
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-33
2
6
J w 0
a> U
6 O LL
a ,~
~ N O R
3
~
<
LL
y
U
~ w
Q W
~
y N
w a
W U
¢ ¢
U ~ ~
N
a w e
a a 3
Q f
> W <
~
LL
¢
F < a
u~
LL LL
¢ a
F F < a LL
io ~ a
LL O f
a z
<
3
2 W N
Q
O
W
J
® n
~a
~
1`
~ F N
Na
Q
C7
w <
6
0: W
~, a ~ y
~~~
W N
W ~ O ,~a{
~ R Y ITS W
6
J
~~~ ~~~
~~.
~ ~ GO
U
> > ~Q
O ~ .. b
Q
O
a a u~
Q Z
Q C ~'
g 4~ °o
~O
~'
W
W
p
F
W
N ~
8 W
~
~
<g
a
~ a
;
W W y
~
u
N V
a 3
W O W y
w
N
N N
~W ~
u
> J N W
y 3~
u
¢,
W W
Q
¢ Oa
9N
N ~, y
n Q O
y i
N ~^
~ a ~O'y
a
3 i~
Y UN C
U
~ <~
~y
~U LH
OC u
~ w
LL
J E f
U~ a
~ Q y2~
3 ~SU <
~ Q q~¢~<
O. >U ~ W
0 a re a
O <¢ i
W <
Q
U NY W a 6N W a 3NW U Y6~ ULL
S
u
Q
~ w
N
~
O ¢
~ O ~
~
O a
a
'T
Q O a
J ~ _
(T
W
c?
LL
A
V
a
q}~w
Rfi
a
~~
w
/~'~w
M
AFi
w
P
~pY~q^
O
~~q^a
~ /'
R
`~y~q'
~~ypT
~b~ygOp
J
O
.yq~ O
L~
~IpI
~J
1~
~~A~
V
Oq~,
i 1~"~"
~®
V
e e ^
0
C
~ ~~~
a ~ ~~g
~E
~'J ~O
v d
Q~
lr1
H
s g
Margarita Village ~. design ~auidelines
Flowering Accent Tree
Iagerstroemia indica Purple Crape Myrtle
As accent trees, the above trees may be utilized at secondary points of project emphasis at
the golf course and neighborhood entries.
b. Evergreen Background Grove Frees
Eucalyptus species and evergreen vertical trees are utilized as informal vertical evergreen
background grove trees on slopes along major perimeter streetscenes. These trees may be used to
block or to frame views. Wherever possible and logical, these evergreen trees are extended from
primary streetscenes into planting areas as background trees iti order to provide visual transitions
and to unify the different land use pazcels.
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Eucalyptus nicolai Nichol's Willow Leafed Peppermint Tree
Eucalyptus polyanthemos Silver Dollaz Gum
Eucalyptus sideroxylon 'Roses' Red Iron Bazk
Pious elderica Mondell Pine
c. dnformal Street Free Groupings
Street trees occur in random informal groupings along the major perimeter project streetscenes.
These medium scale uniform trees serve as foreground elements providing summer shade.
STREETS TREE PALETTE
Margarita Road Schinus mope (California Pepper)
Pious species (Pines)
Pyrus calleryana (Bradford Pear)
La Serena Way Alnus rhombifolia (White Adler)
Schinus mope (California Pepper)
Meadows Parkway Koelreuteria bipinnata (Chinese Flame Tree)
Schinus mope (California Pepper)
Pious species (Pines)
Rancho California Road Platanus acerifolia `Bloodgood' (London Plane
Tree)
Schinus mope (California Pepper)
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-35
. Margarita Village ~ ~. design guidelines
d. Collector Loop Streetscene 'II'rees
Collector loop trees continue and reinforce the overall eazly California'Spanish landscape theme.
These trees aze placed in a formal arrangement and aze utilized in street right-of--ways or median
islands.
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia
Schinus mope California Pepper
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Platanus acerfolia 'Bloodgood` London Plane Tree
Pyrus calleryana Bradford Peaz
e. Golf Course Landscaping
The landscape design development associated with the golf course integrates the golf function and
surrounding residential neighborhoods in an open pazk like atmosphere. This atmosphere is
achieved by the placement of evergreen grove trees along the golf course perimeter and the
combination of lazge open turf play azeas.
The golf course landscape character will be designed with an eazly California Spanish planting
theme. Intensive use of tall palm trees, evergreen grove trees, and a rich variety of plant materials
will be used particulazly identified with the eazly California Spanish landscape.
1) Evergreen Grove/Transition Tree
Evergreen grove/transition trees perform the following functions:
• Provide a safety barrier from stray balls by being spaced at an angle towazds the
direction of play;
• Spacing enframes the golf course view from surrounding neighborhoods;
:• Transitions land uses from open turf azeas to urban neighborhoods; and,
• Screens buffers golf course from surrounding neighborhoods to enhance the recreation
experience and increase the feeling of getting away.
2) Sentinel Golf Course Tree
Evergreen accent trees form a subtle function as a sentinel or distance mazker in designated
locations on the golf course fairways. Sentinel golf course trees may mazk a distance of
play or a change in fairway direction.
9
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-36
Margarita Village l[][][: ][Design guidelines
Evergreen grove/transition trees and sentinel golf course trees will be selected from the
approved plant list with-the advise of the Golf Course Architect.
3) Golf Course Safety Screens
Golf course safety screens may be erected adjacent to roadways or residences as needed for
safety purposes.
f. Plant Materials Palette
It is the intent of these guidelines to provide flexibility and diversity in plant material selection,
while maintaining a limited palette in order to give greater unity and thematic identity to the
community. The plant material lists have been selected for their appropriateness to the project
theme, climatic conditions, soil conditions and concern for maintenance.
A limited selection of materials. utilized in simple, significant composition complimentary to
adjacent common landscape azeas, while reinforcing the individual architectural and site setting,
is encouraged.
Overall plant material selection for given project azeas, whenever possible, shall have compatible
drought resistant characteristics. Irrigation programming can then be designed to minimize water
application for the entire landscape setting.
The limited plant material selection for common landscape areas associated with Margarita Village
Golf Community as described in the text is contained in the following palette. In addition, a wider
variety of plant materials compatible with the project theme and setting is listed for use by
Builders/- Landscape Architects in the selection of materials for model home complex develop-
ments, patio homes, common azeas, etc.
BOTANICAL NAME
Trees -Evergreen
Arbutus unedo
Brachychiton populneus
*Cinnamomum camphors
Cedrus deodara
Eucalyptus nocolaii
Eucalyptus polyanthemos
Eucalyptus sideroxylon `Roses'
Eucalyptus viminalis
Eucalyptus rudis
Laurus nobilis
Magnolia grandiflora
Pinus halepensis/Pinus eldarica
Pinus pines
COMMON NAME
Strawberry Tree
Bottle Tree
Camphor Tree
Deodaz Cedar
Nichol's Willow Leafed Peppermint Tree
Red Box Gum
Red Iron Bazk
White Gum
Desert Gum
Sweet Bay
Southern Magnolia
Aleppo Pine
Italian Stone Pine
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-37
Margarita Village° ~. ][.Design Qyuidelines
BOTANICAL NAME ~ ~ COMMON NAME .
Podocarpus gracilior Fem Pine
Pyrus kawakamii Evergreen Peal
Quercus agrifolia Califomia Live Oak
Quercus ilex Holly Oak
Schinus mope California Pepper
Ulmus parvifolia 'Drake' Evergreen Elm
Umbellularia californica Califomia Bay
Trees -Deciduous'
Albizia julibrissin' Mimosa,Tree
AZnus rhombifolia White Alder
Betula alba White Birch
Fiaxinus velutina Arizona Ash
Fraxinus uhdei `Tomlinson' Tomlinson Ash
Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree
Gleditsia tricanthos `Shade Master' Honey Locust
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Koelreuteria panniculata Golden Rain Tree
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Nyssa sylvatica , Sour Gum
Platanus acerifolia 'Bloodgood' London Plane Tree
Populus nigra 'Italica' Lombazdy Poplaz
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache
Prunus cerasifera Purple leaf plum
Salix babylonica Weeping Willow
Zelkova serrulata Sawleaf Zelkova
Palms
Brahea edulis Guadalupe Palm '
Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm
Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean Fan Palm
Washingtonia jilifera Califomia Fan Palm
Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm
Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm
Shrubs
Abelia 'Edward Goucher' (S) Edwazd Goucher Abelia
*Acacia ongernp (S) No Common Name
*Acacia redolens (S) No Common Name
q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-38
-Margarifa Village ~: design guidelines
Q BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Berberis species (S, SH) Baibeny
Camellia species (SH) Camellia
Callistemon species (S) ~ . Bottle Brush
Cocculus Laurifolius (S) .. Snailseed
Cotoneaster species (S) Cotoneaster
Elaeagnus pungens (S) Silver Berry
Euonymus fortunei (S) No Common Name
Euonymus japonica (S) Evergreen Euonymus
Hebe coed (SH) Veronica
Ilex species (SH) Holly
*Lantana montevidensis Lantana
Leptospermum scoparium (S) New Zealand Tea Tree
Ligustrum japonica (S, SH) Japanese Privet
Mahonia aquifolium and `Compacta' Oregon Grape
Nandina domestica and `Compacta' (S, Heavenly Bamboo
Nerium oleander (S) Oleander
Osmantus fragrans (S, SH) Sweet Olive
O Photinia frazeri (S) Photinia
Pittosporum tobira and 'Wheelers Dwarf Mock Orange
Podocarpus macrophyllus (S, SH) Firethorn
Raphiolepis indica species (S, SH) Pink Indian Hawthorn
Ternstroemia gymnanthera (SH) No Common Name
Xylosma congestum (S) Xylosma
Sub Shrubs
*;4gapanthus africanus (S, SH) Lily of the Nile
Dietes bicolor (S) Fortnight Lily
Hemerocallis species (S) Day Lily
Juniperus species (S) Juniper
Lonicera japonica 'Haliana' (S) Hall's Honeysuckle
Trachelospermum jasminoides (S, SH) Star Jasmine
Vines
Ampelopsis veitchi (SH) Boston Ivy
Dozantha unguis-cati (S) Cat's Claw Vine
Ficus pumila (S, SH) Creeping Fig
Gelsemium sempervirens (S) Carolina Jasmine
Jasminum mesyni (S) Primrose Jasmine
Jasminum polyanthum (S) No Common Name
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 ,Page III-39
Margarita Village ~. ][Design ~auidelines
BOTANICAL NAME
Wisteria floribunda (S)
Groundcovers
Baccharis pi[ularis 'Twin Peaks' (S)
Duchesnea indica (S, SH)
*Hedera helix (SH)
Hypericum calycinum (S)
L,onicera japonica (S)
Myoporum parvifolium (S)
Potentilla verna (S, SH)
Rosemarinus officinalis (S)
COMMON NAME
Wisteria
Coyote Bmsh
Indian Mock Strawberry
English Ivy
Aazon's Beazd :.
Honeysuckle
Myoporum
Spring Cinquefoil
Rosemary
*Will freeze in unprotected exposure azea but will generally rejuvenate from undamaged
parts. Use with caution.
S - Tolerates sun in this planting zone.
SH - Tolerates shade in this planting zone.
1) Year-Round Turf Grass Seed Mix
One hundred percent (100%) turf type tall fescue. .
2) Suitable Seasonal Turf Grass Seed Mixes
Common Bermuda (Cynodon dacrylon)
Hybrid Bermuda.
The planting time will vary for these types as Bermuda grass should not be planted during
its dormant season.
g. Streetscane
Streetscape or streetscenes include the combination of landscape and hazdscape features visible
from a given roadway. These features generally include the project wall at the boundary of
adjoining land use described elsewhere; the project sidewalk, `Edison' street light,fixtures, entry
monumentation wall features described elsewhere, traffic control and directional signage.
There are three (3) levels of streetscene within Village "A": arterial highway perimeter streets,
perimeter streets and residential neighborhood streets.
O
1
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-40
Margarita Village l[][][. Design ~vuidelines
h. Arterial gIighway ]Perimeter Streetscenes
The landscape development associated with the arterial highway landscape project streetscenes
along Mazgarita Pazkway and Rancho California Road consists of:
:• Thirty two foot (32') minimum landscape development zone;
• Informal street tree groupings;
• Evergreen background grove and accent grove trees;
• Project thematic solid wall;
• A hierarchy of entry monumentation; and,
• $orizontal and vertical grade sidewalk meandering.
1) Thirty Two Foot (32') Landscape Development Zone
The streetscene planting concept consists of the street trees, accent trees and grove trees
planted within a `Landscape Development Zone.' The arterial highway project streetscene
Landscape Development Zone is defined as the planting area from the face of the street curb
to the streetright-of--way, a twelve foot (12') maximum plus an additional twenty foot (20')
for athirty-two foot* (32') minimum on the perimeter community streetscene.
*The thirty-two foot (32') Landscape Development Zone reflects a five foot, six inch (5'-6")
concrete sidewalk which meanders from a five foot (5') minimum to a twenty foot (20')
maximum away from the face of the curb. This condition is consistent for flat, transition
areas and 2:1 slopes. The sidewalk also has vertical grade changes.
a) Slope Gradient Changes
Manufactured slopes shall be a 4:1 gradient from the face of curb for a distance
oftwelve feet (12'). The rest of the slope can be a 2:1 gradient from the twelve foot
(12') distance to the top of slope. The 4:1 gradient allows for vertical grade changes
with the meandering sidewalk.
b) Turf
Turf will be planted between the edge of the sidewalk and the face of the curb. The
turf shall also meander between the edge of the sidewalk and along any 4:1 gradient
or less slope.
c) Trees
The street trees occur in informal groves clustered azound the meandering sidewalk.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-41
~;
• ~~ ~~-~P~ ~ SCHINUS MOLLE
' ~ ~ PLATANUS ACERIFOIIA'BLOODGOOD'
' '~ ~ . °{y8. SHRUB MASSiNGS
.a
.~: •~ A.
~~8g ~ 2~y 5'-6'HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE ADJACENTTO
- ~ Qy' ~ . ~1 - GOLF COURSE OR TUBULAR STEEL OR SOLID
~. ~ •~ WALL ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL
~~ : ~• GOLF COURSE/RESIDENTIALLOT
NOTE: THIS CROSS SECTION WILL
OCCUR ALONG RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD (P.A. 36). SEE FIGURE III-17.
FIGURE III-18
VILLAGE "A":
SECTION E-1 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE-RANCHO CALIFORNIA- ROAD
~• oe ~ ~ ~i ~~~~~Il~~ ~nIlIl~~~
v ~;~ ~~»
o
III-42
NOTE: THIS CROSS SECTION WILL
OCCUR ALONG MARGARITA ROAD
(P.A. 33) AND ALONG RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD (P.A.38). SEE
FIGURE III-17.
i SPECIES
S MOLLS
IPECIES
)LF COURSE/RESIDENTIAL LOT
HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
iOUD WALL
UB MASSINGS
FIGURE III-19
VILLAGE "A":
SECTION E-2 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY
C~ q
~ ~ ~m~.~
LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE-MARGARITA ROAD
~~r~~~r~Il~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
TTT_d~
Margarita Village ill. Design guidelines
The evergreen grove and accent grove trees meander from four foot (4') at back of
the curb and up the slope in order to reinforce the planting theme.
This landscape streetscene standazd is unique to the project. In our opinion, the
landscape standazds achieve the City standazds.
i. 1Vlajor and Secondary lE][ighway Streetscenes
The landscape development associated with the major and secondary streetscenes along La Serena
Way and Meadows Parkway is uniform and consistent with the existing Rancho California
community wide streetscenes.
1) Twenty Foot (20') Landscape Development
The landscape development associated with the perimeterproject streetscenes along
La Serena Way and Meadows Parkway consists of:
• Informal street tree groupings;
• Evergreen background grove and grove trees;
• Project thematic masonry wall or combination masonry wall and tubular steel
frame with pilasters; and,
• A hierarchy of entry monumentation.
a) Pazkwavs
Eleven (11') and twelve foot (12') pazkways occur on the perimeter
streetscenes. On the above mentioned streets, a standazd five and a half
foot (5'/z') walk adjoins the street curb. There are varying height slopes
which begin atthe pazkwayright-of-way. Groundcover is planted between
the edge of sidewalk and the tow of slope. The street trees and background
trees meander from the edge of the sidewalk and up the slopes.
b) Slopes
Slopes adjoining the perimeter streets aze mainly 2:1. All the slopes aze
planted with a combination of drought resistant, erosion control ground-
cover and trees. The shrubs aze planted a maximum of ten feet (10') on
center but no tall shrubs aze to be planted within ten (10) vertical feet of a
community view wall. Fast growing evergreen background grove trees aze
kept clustered neaz property lines to avoid obstructing any rear yard views.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-44
0
4',MIN_ LANDSCAPE
SHRUB AND GROUN
BUFFER PLANTING
PROJECT THEME MI
WALL WITH PILASTE
0
LANDSCAPE DEVELO
NOTE: THIS CROSS SECTION WILL
OCCUR ALONG LA SERENA WAY
(P.A. 43) AND MEADOWS PARKWAY
(P.A. 38). SEE FIGURE III-17.
"FORMAL STREET TREE GROUPWGS
URF PARKWAY
- 6" SIDEWALK PARALLEL TO STREET
FIGURE III-20
VILLAGE 'A'
SECTION A-1 MAJOR AND SECONDARY
HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE -FLAT CONDITION
.o
B q
~
~btlua°ra`m~
u ~ ~/~~,~~~
~~i~~~r~Il~~ ~InIl~~~c~
TTr~c
EVERGREEN BACXGROUND
GROVE TREES
SLOPE LANDSCAPING WITH GROUNDCOVER
FROM FLATS AND CONTAINER SHRUBS
SHRUBS PLANTED SUFFICIENTLY DOWN THE SLOPE
TO PRESERVE VIEWS
OF SLOPE
S'-8' SIDEWALK
PROJECT THEME WALL WITH MASONRY
PILASTERS AND TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
WALL/FENCE
SET BACK 1'
NOTE: THIS CROSS SECTION WILL
OCCUR ALONG MEADOWS PARKWAY
(P.A. 40, 43). SEE FIGURE III-17.
T.S.
FIGURE III-21
VILLAGE "A'
L~~
. o ~ - ~.
~ »~~~
SECTION A-2 MAJOR AND SECONDARY HIGHVNAY
LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE -SLOPE CONDITION 20`
~~~~~pIl~~ ~IlIlIl~~~
lIi-46
Margarita Village ~. design Qsuidelines
2) Residential Neighborhood Streetscape.
a) .Required Residential Lot Street Trees
Each single family residential lot in MARGARITA VILLAGE shall receive a
minimum of one (1), fifteen (15) gallon size street tree planted intheright-
of-way. In addition, corner lots shall receive a minimum of two (2), fifteen
(15) gallon size street trees also planted in the right-of--way.. Tree variety
shall be chosen from MARGARITA VII.LAGE Tree Palette contained herein.
One (1) species of tree shall be selected and approved for each residential
street to maximize visual-neighborhood identity.. Deciduous or flowering
evergreen accent trees which contrast with the chosen street tree are
encouraged at cul-de-sacs, knuckles and intersections to provide emphasis
and interest.
b) Interior Slope Landscape
All interior slope occurring within the project theme walls shall be
landscaped and irrigated per the City of Temecula landscape standards.
The builder/developer shall install all slopes not designated as common
azea. Each builder should confirm the standazds with the City.
j. 1Vgulti-family I~ousin~ ~,andst;ape ]tequirement
Landscaping is a critical element in achieving an overall quality of .life in.multi-family density
housing. The following criteria shall apply to the following:
1) Pedestrian and vehiculaz circulation shall be clearly defined with a landscape treatment.
2) Carports and pazking stalls shall be screened and softened with landscape planters.
3) Project entry drives should be designed to provide an overview of the landscape and
recreational facilities.
4) Trash bins should be fully enclosed with six foot (6') stucco walls with metal gates and shall
be screened with landscape buffers.
5) Trash bin locations should be conveniently located for ease of maintenance and trash
locations. Recommended locations include inside parking courts or at the end of pazking
bays.
6) Maximize turf areas and minimize shrub areas to provide greater usable landscape aeeas and
for ease of maintenance.
7) Conform to City of Temecula landscape standazds.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-47
V
mil[.
8) All applicable general residential neighborhood streetscene requirements shall apply.
9) Wherever possible, canopy-trees should be utilized to shade and mitigate the summer heat.
10) Plant material shall shade western sides of buildings, especially windows to reduce heat
gain inside homes.
11) Plant material should form a smooth transition between neighborhood and streetscene
landscaping.
k: Edison/1VIIWIID Easement Streetscane
These easement azeas are unique in that the uniform perimeter streetscenes should be maintained
but certain design criteria must.be considered.
1. Golf Course
The golf course layout includes generous fairway widths. This course will be designed for the skill
range of the average golf player.
The golf course layout flows through and azound'the various MWD easements and the Long Valley
Drainage corridor. The Long Valley drainage corridor pazallels Rancho California Road. Golf.
course holes 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 aze planned alongside the drainage corridor. Thereby emphasizing
the golf course drainage corridor function as a recreation amenity: ~
m. Entry Monumentation
Project entries consists of a thematic blend of construction features, landscape features, project
identity signage and specialty lighting that convey the unique image of Village "A".
A hierarchy of project entries reinforces the unique Golf Community thematic image. The
hierazchy consists of major project entry monumentation, minor project entry monumentation and
project intersection identity entry monumentation.
~-J
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-48
Margarita Village lLl~l~. design ~auidelines
Q 1) Major Project Entry Monumentation (Figures III-22 and III-23)
A major project entry occurs on Rancho California Road. The overall sense of entry
monument is created by a harmonious blend of thematic features occumng in a formal,
symmetrical configuration on both sides of this roadway including:
•'• Accent tower element with signage;
• Backdrop stucco wall with pilasters;
• Low foreground stucco planter walls;
:• An informal backdrop of Palm and Pine trees integrated with the foregoing wall system;
• Project identification graphics;
• Blend of flowering shrubs, vines, and groundcover;
• Rollingturfgrassforegroundintroducingthestreetscenetreatmentandcreatingavisual
pazk-like threshold;
• Recessed specialty lighting to focus upon and highlight the constmction features;
a Planted median;
2) Minor Project Entry Monumentation (Figures III-24 and III -25)
These minor community entries occur on Margarita Road, La Serena Way, and Meadows
Pazkway and the access road between Planning Areas 38 and 40. These project entries
convey the unique project identity by repetition of significant major project entry
monumentation features or landscaping but will exclude the impact of the golf community
entry monumentation. The project entries occur on both sides of the roadway and shall
feature:
• Backdrop stucco wall with masonry pilasters. This wall may also form a residential
property line perimeter wall;
Accent evergreen focal trees.
• Flowering blend of shrubs, vines and groundcover;
Project identification graphics;
S• Resident only operated gate system at the Minor Entries located between Planning
Areas 38 and 40 if Planning Areas 38 and 40 aze private.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page 1II-49
ce,
A~
6.+L
I~
^~
N
N
W
7
C7
O , O
~~ :'
!1
ti
O
v rnv
~ r~
L~J
L~.1
m
N
W
Z
{_°
1.x..1
L1J
L1J
~.
l.d.l
~_
O~
Q~
0
v xv
.d
3
Y
al
~'
0
Q
111
~~
I
~.
U
W
N
W
LL
~~~~
a
~#~~g
Q~
0
a~.o
.d
O~ ~1
N
--- _ "~, o o ~ id~.oa
3nlaa _.3~d laa 9_ -
0
l
e
..f. .
t 4',a'.
FIGURE III-25
VILLAGE "A":
O MINOR PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENTATION ELEVATION
. a q ~ ~ v~~r~~~~n~~ ~IIlIlIl~~~
~9 .e ~~~,~~,~
m-s3
Margarita Village I[l[lI. design Qpuidelines
O
3) Project Intersection Identity Monumentation (Figure III-26)
Project Intersection identity monumentation occurs at the cornerofRancho California Road
as it intersects Mazgarita Road. This monumentation feature includes:
:• Freestanding project identification signage wall;
• signage including a mazquis sign;
•'• Golf course water feature;
• Accent trees and shrubs;
• Turf grass foregroundintroducingthegolfcourseandstreetscenetreatmentandcreating
a visual park-like threshold;
• Scaled down version of the planter wall system.
n. Entry Monumentation Lighting
O All lighting shall conform to the Mount Palomar lighting standazds. Electrical meter pedestal and
light switch/control equipment shall be located with minimum public visibility or shall be screened
with appropriate plant materials.
o. Community Walls and Fencing (Fil*ure YII-27)
A strong cohesive appeazance is achieved through [he use of project walls and general overall wall
guidelines. All walls which adjoin Temeku Hills Homeowner's Association maintained pazcels or
areas maintained by the Temecula Community Services District shall be located entirely within
such parcels for common maintenance allowance. Such walls shall be termed `community walls'
and shall be designed and installed in accordance with these standard details.
1) Wall Standards/Jurisdiction/Application
Community wall standards described and detailed herein aze intended to apply to all
situations where such walls aze visible from public streets, public use areas and common
Homeowner's Association maintenance areas.
Specifically excluded are: residential rear yard and side yard situations not adjoining a
public street or common use area; single family front yard enclosure fencing and perimeter
fencing for attached product areas. Wall applications in these areas will be evaluated for
O appropriateness with the azchitectural setting. Refer to the individual product interior
walUfence criteria portion of these standazds.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-54
0
0
-~-~,-
e
.. ,. a
ROAD
FIGURE III-26
Oq
~a ~a
VILLAGE "A":
PROJECT INTERSECTION
IDENTIFICATION MONUMENTATION PLAN
~~~
~~G~
~~ ' ~i ~~~~~Il~~ ~InIlIl~~c~
owm.ammosa®
f
III-55
W
U
W
W
Z
W
a
O
w
m
ti
s
4
8
ti
W
JV
W Z
W W
W
~ 2
S31dVA
.S-.S
3
g
0
J
S31dVA
J
J
O
{- J
~~
ZU
~~
O~
U'
~O
w~
2~
1--
~.
O
U
C)
LL J
~ ~
wU
~a
O~
w~
~.. O
F-
Z J
~ W
O
U
Z
W
~ a
~
w
~ J
~ W
g ~
° ~
~
° o~ z
gLL
~ m~
w
~
u
i ~ >
LL
J
OU
~~
w >-
~ ~-
w
2Z
O
U
~w
O
U.
J
~_~
J ~
W ~
2
~O
~j
~W _~
~_
U
J ~"
W
W
~ ~ J
jWOU-..
HW~
f'
W ~ ~
~~~
~W~ ~
U ~
OO~w ~
h
N
W
,_
LL
O~.
~~ a
0
n
0
cav
~~
-.1Vlargarita Village ][][][.. ][Design Q4uidelines
O
2)
Where privacy or protection of common area views dictate, a solid masonry wall
with pilasters shall be used. Pilaster constructed of sixteen (16) inch square column
block shall be randomly spaced at changes in vertical and horizontal direction and
at other intervals appropriate to the length of wall run. When designated to be
installed on the property line between two (2) residential properties, a stucco half
pilaster is specified; the centerline of the half pilaster should be positioned on the
property line.
a) Solid Wall Base Requirements
b) Open/View Wall Base Requirement
Where view opportunity is a premium and where visual protection from common
maintenance azeas is assured, an open or view wall shall be used. The wall or fence
shall be five feet, six inches (5'-6") minimum height constructed between masonry
pilasters. The pilasters shall match those described herein for the base requirement
solid wall treatment inclusive of size, design, configuration and location.
O
b) Open View Wall Base Application
Where interior lot view opportunities exist without a privacy conflict, an open view
fence or wall is appropriate. Such a view fence shall be compatible with the
architectural setting.
c) Golf course safety screens shall be erected adjacent to roadways or residences as
needed for safety purposes.
p. Parks and Recreation Amenities
O
Individual Product Interior Wall/Fence Criteria
a) Product Theme Solid Wall Base Requirements
A uniform solid wall designed to reinforce the azchitectural setting while remaining
compatible with the previously described perimeter wall program is encouraged and
should be utilized at selected lots. The visual integrity of the overall neighborhood
streetscene will, therefore, be protected. These uniform thematic solid walls shall
be constructed of masonry or wood materials or a combination of masonry pilasters
with wood fence panels.
Planning Area 44 has been planned as a public pazk. This pazk will serve the residents of Village
"A" of the Margarita Village Specific Plan as well other adjacent residential azeas. The pazk will
be approximately 12.5 acres in size unless the developer achieves fewer dwelling units than allowed
by the Specific Plan for Village "A" in which case the size of the park will be reduced by the same
proportion The park shall include active recreational uses including the following:
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-57
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
I. Two lighted softball fields (300' minimum outfield dimension) 1 1
2. Two soccer fields (300' x 150' minimum dimension) ~/
3. A junior Olympic swimming pool with a bath house
4. A snack baz/restroom building, parking for 100 to 150 cars
5. Picnic areas
6. A children's play azea
A conceptual layout of the pazk is shown on Figure III-27A. The -pazk will be constructed to the
standazds of the Temecula Community Services District by the developer of Village "A" and upon
completion will be dedicated to the Temecula Community Services District for ownership and
maintenance.
q. Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility
Maintenance of common aeeas and streetscenes within Village "A" shall be provided in one of two
ways:
• The'Temecula Community Services District may maintain the major perimeter streetscenes
adjoining Rancho California Road, Mazgarita Road, La Serena Way, Meadows Pazkway, the access
road/primary entry off of Rancho California Road ahd the access road'extending from the primary
entry off of Rancho Califomia Road to I.a Serena Way. This will specifically include the azea from
back of curb to the community theme wall.
• 'If these perimeter streetscenes aze not accepted for maintenance by the Temecula Community O
Services District, Temeku Hills Homeowner's Association will maintain these aeeas.
In either case, the Community Homeowner's Association will maintain the major interior
neighborhood streetscenes. Major internal neighborhood slopes, major slopes pazalleling the
easement aeeas and the utility company easement aeeas will be Homeowner's Association
maintained.
I,ow to moderately high slopes located within the interior residential neighborhoods and on fenced
private lots are the individual homeowner's maintenance responsibility. The builder will install
slope erosion control planting as necessary per the City of Temecula standazds and maintain these
slopes only until the homes aze owner occupied.
O
J
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page.III-58
1 !I
~~ 1 yAy
O \~ b
~.~ SEsPEiY.9 ~ l~.4r I
.~ n
~--~ ~
~ ~ I J
I
~ .~
l --. ~-
~_~
\ ~~ ~ --
i ~_~ I
y-
®~
~~
` ~
~ ~ E
~ O
2
~ ~
.n
® &
~
K
F o
~
~~- M
me
~y ~~~ 43 Sf dl.
MH
6 ee
H u3°`
]LOW
.
N to ou O5
ti ARK
- +vsx
~3 °
i
>,
FIGURE III-27A
VILLAGE "A":
Q PARK SITE P.A. 44
9
~a 0~ ~~~~~Il~~ ~I~IlIl~~c~
~,
I , ~ _TIl1
~J~
~-
`~ r~ ~~
I r- -I ~
~_•
L~ ~J
~~P
tP~ /
l
t
'.
\~,,~~
KEY MAP
III-58
Margarita Village ~. Design ~vuidelines
O 3. ~nllIl~ge "I~" lL~>maIlsc~~n>mg ][~eq~unu>re>r>rnc>raIls
a. Y'roject Streetscenes
The landscape development associated with the streetscenes along La Serena Way, Rancho
California Road, Meadows Pazkway, and Butterfield Stage Road is uniform and consistent with the
existing City of Temecula community wide streetscenes.
The landscape development associated with the perimeter project streetscenes along La Serena
Way, Rancho Califomia Road, Meadows Pazkway, and Butterfield Stage Road consists of:
•~ Informal street tree groupings;
•: Evergreen background and deciduous accent grove trees;
• Project thematic masonry wall with pilasters or open tubular steel fence with pilasters; and,
• A hierarchy of entry monumentation.
1) Project Entry Accent Trees
O Califomia Pepper (Schinus mope) and Italian Stone Pine (Pinus pinea) are the primary
evergreen canopy theme trees utilized atpoints ofproject emphasis throughout MARGARITA
VILLAGE. As such, they represent foreground specimen accent trees at major and minor
project entry monumentation features. These trees. are also repeated at significant points
throughout the community. Such applications logically include street intersections and
changes in street direction where a reinforcement of the project theme tree will be
recognized and will serve a functional purpose.
2) Evergreen Background Grove Trees
Eucalyptus species and Pine trees are utilized as informal vertical evergreen background
grove trees on slopes along major perimeter streetscenes. The Aleppo Pine is not planted
along Rancho California Road. These trees may be used to block or to frame views.
Wherever possible and logical, these evergreen grove trees are extended from primary
streetscenes into planting azeas as background trees in order to provide visual transitions
and to unify the different parcels.
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-59
t,.LI o F
F a N Z S
Ib~~
~~
~~~~a~ ~~3~~ a~ ~~ ~~a~
~ ~ ~
~~ ~~f)deooao~goea ®®~~1~C)o
~~ ~ ~
ea
~8 ` ~Y
Q~' Q
~~
N
I
W
R.
',
LL
\7
P''
w
w
~'
a
P
tlA~A
Y
a
a
a
\q,~'a
l`A\/'
d V
O
O
~~
~9 J
C~
vo
0
Leo
vxv
.d
Margarita Village ~~. design Q~vuidelines
O 3) Deciduous Accent Trees
4)
5)
O
b.
London Plane (Platanus acerifolia) and Sweetgum (Liquidambarsryraciflua) azedeciduous
accent trees occurring in random groupings among the evergreen background grove trees.
These trees provide visual highlights and seasonal interest among the evergreen trees.
Informal Street Tree Groupings
Street trees occur in random informal groupings along the. major andsecondary landscape
project streetscenes. These medium scale uniform trees serve as deciduous foreground
elements providing summer shade and permitting welcome winter sun. Other applications
of these trees include use as interior residential street trees. Each major and secondary
landscape project streetscene has a single street type variety identifying that street. This
also aids in unifying the various neighborhoods which occur along each streetscene.
Perimeter Project Street Trees
STREET' TREES
La Serena Way
Rancho California Road
Butte~eld Stage Road
Meadows Pazkway
Plant Materials Palette
PLANTPALI"TTfi
Alnus rhombifolia (White Alder) .
Platanus acerifolia (London Plane Tree)
Pistacia chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
Ceratonia Siliqua (Cazob)
Albizia julibrissin (Mimosa Tree)
It is the intent of these guidelines to provide flexibility and diversity in plant material selection,
while maintaining a limited palette in order to give greater unity and thematic identity to the
community.. The plan[ material lists have been selected for their appropriateness to the project
theme, climatic conditions, soil conditions, and concern for maintenance. A limited selection of
materials utilized in simple, significant composition complimentary to adjacent common landscape
aeeas, while reinforcing the individual architectural and site setting, is encouraged:.
Overall plant material selection for given project areas, wherever possible shall have compatible
drought resistant chazacteristics. Imgation programming can then be designed to minimize water
application for the entire landscape setting.
O
The limited plant material selection for common landscape aeeas associated with MARGARITA
VILLAGE as described in the text is contained in the following palette. In addition, a wider variety
of plant materials compatible with the project theme and setting is listed for selection of materials
for model home complex developments, patio home common aeeas, etc:
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-61
Margarita. Village ~. ][Design Qvuidelines
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Trees -Evergreen
Arbutus unedo ='Strawberry Tree
Brachychiton populneus - Bottle Tree
Cedrus deodara Deodaz Cedar
Eucalyptus polyanthemos Red;Box~Gum ,
Eucalyptus sideroxylon `Roses' Red Iron Bazk
Eucalyptus viminalis White Gum `"
Eucalyptus rudis _ Desert Gum
Magnolia, grandiflora ;Southern Magnolia
Ole'a europaea `Fruitless' Fruitless Olive "
Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine
Pinus halepensis/Pinus eldarica Aleppo Pine.
Pinus pines Italian Stone Pine
Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine
Quercus agrifolia Califomia Live Oak
Quercus ilex Holly Oak
Schinus mope California Pepper' -'
Ulmus parvifolia `Drake' Evergreen Elm, .
Trees -Deciduous
Albizia julibrissin Mimosa Tree
Alnus rhombifolia White Alder
Berula albs White Birch
Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash
Fraxinus uhdei 'Tomlinson' 'Tomlinson Ash
Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree
Glediisia tricanthos'Shade Master' Honey Locus[
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
Liquidambar sryraciflua Sweet Gum. ,
Morus albs `Fruitless' Fruitless Mulberry
Myssa sylvatica Sour Gum
Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache
Salix babylonica Weeping Willow
Zelkova serrulata Chinese Zelkova
O
O
O
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-62
1Vlargarita Village"' ~. dDesign Q~uidelines
O Shrubs
Abelia `Edward toucher' (S) Edwazd Goucher Abelia
*Acacia ongerup (S) No Common Name
*Acacia redolens (S) No Common Name .
Berberis species (S; SH) :. Bazberry
Camellia species (SH) Camellia
Cocculus laurifolius (S) Snailseed
Cotoneasterspecies(S) Cotoneaster
Elaeagnus pungens (S) Silver Berry
Euonymus fortunei (S) ._. No Common` Name
Euonymus japonica (S) Evergreen Euonytnus
Hebe coed (S, SH) Veronica
Ilex species (SH) Holly
Leptospermum scoparium-(S)r New Zealand Tea Tree
Ligustrum japonica (S, SH) Japanese Privet
Nandina domestica and `Compacta''(S, Heavenly Bamboo
SH)
O Nerium oleander (S)
S
O
t
SH Oleander.,
S
Oli
sman
us fragrans (
,
) ve
weet
Photinia fraseri (S) Photinia
Pittosporum tobira (S,SH) and Mock Orange
Pittosporum tobira `Wheelers Dwarf' (S,
SH)
Podocarpus macrophyllus (S, SH) Yew Pine
Prunus caroliniana (S) Carolina Laurel Cherry
Prunus ilicifolia (S) Hollyleaf Cherry
Pyracantha species (S, SH) _ Firethorn
Raphiolepis indica species (S, SH) Pink Indian Hawthorn
Ternstroemia gymnanthera (SH) No Common Name
Xylosma congestum (S) Xylosma
Sub Shrubs
*Agapanthus africanus (S, SH) Lily of the Nile
Arctostaphylos species (S) Manzanita
Dietes bicolor (S) Fortnight Lily
Hemerocallis species (S) Day Lily .
O Juniperus species (S)
Lonicera japonica `Haliana' (S) Juniper
Hall's Honeysuckle
Trachelospermum jasminoides (S; SH) Star Jasmine
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-63
Margarifa;Village ~. ][Design wtiidelines
Vines
Doxantha unguis-tali (S)
Ficus pumila (S, SH) .
Gelsemium sempervirens, (S).
Jasminum polyanthum (S)
Parthenocissus tricuspidata (SH) :_
Wisteria floribunda (S)
Cat's Claw Vine
Creeping Fig
Cazolina Jasmine
No Common Name
Boston Ivy
Wisteria
a
Groundcovers
Baccharis pilularis 'Twin Peaks' (S)
Duchesnea indica (S; SH) : _ .
*Hedera helix (SH)
Hypericum calycinum (S)
I.onicera japonica (S)
Myoporum parvifolium (S)
Potentilla verna (S, SH) ~.. .
Rosemarinus officinalis (S)
Coyote Brush
Indian Mock Strawberry
English Ivy
Aaron's Beazd
Honeysuckle
Myoporum
Spring Cinquefoil
Rosemary..
*Will freeze in unprotected exposure azea but will generally rejuvenate from undamaged
parts. Use with caution.
S - Tolerates sun in this,planting zone.
SH - Tolerates shade in this planting zone.
1. Year-Around Turf Grass Mix
Ninety percent (90%) Festuca arundinaceae -ten (]0) pounds per one thousand (1,000)
square feet; ten percent (10%) Kentucky Bluegrass.
2. Suitable Seasonal Turf Grass Mixes
Common Bermuda (Cynodon dactylon)
Hybrid Bermuda
The planting time will vary for these types as Bermuda grass should not be planted during
its dormant season:
c. Streetscane
Streetscape or streetscenes include the combination of landscape and hardscape features visible
from a given roadway. These features generally include the project wall at the boundary of O
adjoining land use described elsewhere; the project sidewalk, `Edison' street light fixtures, entry
monumentation wall features described elsewhere, traffic control and directional signage.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-64
0
4' MM. LANDSCAPE
SHRUB AND GROUN
BUFFER PLANTRJG
SOLID PROJECT MA:
WALL WITH PILASTE
"FORMAL STREET TREE GROUPINGS
URF PARKWAY
'- 6' SIDEWALK PARALLEL TO STREET
O
LANDSCAPE I'fFVFI (`.
Note: This
will occur
Parkway (P.A.
Butterfield St
7, 9, 12).
III-28.
~~ q~
cross-section
along Kaiser
4, 5) and
age Road (P.A.
See Figure
FIGURE III-29
VILLAGE B`
SECTION A-1 MAJOR AND SECONDARY
.HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE -FLAT CONDITION
V~l~c~l~'~d1I~Il{~d`1 ~Il~~c~1~C~
III-65
O
EVERGREEN BACKGROUND -
GROVE TREES WITH DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREES
O
12'
WALL/FENCE VARIES RO.W.
SET BACK 7' 6' MIN. N.T.S.
Note: This cross-section
will occur along Rancho
California Road (P.A. 10, 11,
12) and La Serena Way (P.A.
2, 3, 4, 6). See Figure
III-28.
SLOPE LANDSCAPING WfTH GROUNDCOVER
FROM FLATS AND CONTAINER SHRUDS .
SHRUBS PUNTED SUFFICIENTLY DOWN THE SLOPE
70 PRESERVE VIEWS
OF SLOPE
S'-S' SIDEWALK
PROJECT THEME WALL WITH MASONRY
PILASTERS AND TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
FIGURE III-38'
VILLAGE "B"
SECTION A-2 MAJOR AND SECONDARY
O HIGHWAY ~ANDSCAP,E STREET SCEP~E -SLOPE CONDITION
u q ~ ~~~~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~~
li v o~ .....~.~_
III-66
0
GROVE
TREES
rRO~ECT THEME n+nsoNRr
AND TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
O
EQUESTRIAN TRAL
C EQUESTRIAN FENCE
ORMAL STREET TREE GROUPPJGS
RUB AND GROUNDCOVER
1NTNG ZONE
5 SmEWALK BACK OF CURB
''i o` • _
:S ....
1L
2
Note: This
will occur
Parkway (P.A.
III-28.
cross-section
along Kaiser
8). See Figure
FIGURE III-3t
VILLAGE "B"
0
~ ° q
SECTION D EQUESTRIAN TRAIL AT MAJOR &
SECONDARY HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE STREET SCENES
~ ~~r~~~~Il~~ ~InIlIl~~~
III-67
Margarita Village ' ][l[lL : design guidelines
O There aze two (2) levels of streetscene at MARGARITA VILLAGE:.perimeter streets and residential
neighborhood streets. There is one (1) exception to this streetscene which occurs along Meadows
Parkway. An equestrian easement has been conditioned along Meadows Parkway.
1) Major and Secondary Highway Landscape Streetscene..
Major and Secondary Highway Landscape streetscenes with uniform thematic treatment
include La Serena Way, Rancho California Road, Meadows Parkway, and Butterfie]d Stage
Road.
a) . , Patkwavs
Eleven (11) and twelve foot (12') pazkways occur on the perimeter streetscenes. On
the above mentioned streets, a standard five foot six inch (5'-6") walk adjoins the
street curb.. There are varying height slopes which. begin at the parkway right-of-
way. Groundcover is planted between the edge of sidewalk and the toe of slope.
The street trees and background trees meander from the edge of sidewalk and up
the slopes.
b) Slopes
Slopes adjoining the perimeter streets are mainly 2:1. -All the slopes aze planted
O with a combination of droughtresistant,erosion control groundcover and trees. The
shrubs aze planted a maximum of ten feet (10') on center but no tall shrubs are to
~ be planted within ten (10), vertical feet of a community view wall. Fast growing
Eucalyptus trees are kept clustered near property lines to avoid obstructi ng any rear
yard views.
2) Residential Neighborhood Streetscape
a. Required Residential Lot Street Trees
Each single family residential lot in MARGARTTA VILLAGE shall receive a minimum
of one (1), fifteen (15) gallon size street trees also planted in the right-of--way. In
addition, comer lots shall receive a minimum of two (2), fifeen (15) gallon size
street trees also planted in the right-of-way. Tree variety shall be chosen from
MARGARTTA VILLAGE Tree Palette contained herein. Trees are clustered neaz
property liens periodically to maximize their groving effect and streetscene impact.
One (1) species of tree shall be selected and approved for each residential street to
maximize visual neighborhood identity. Deciduous or flowering evergreen accent
trees which contrast with the chosen street tree are encouraged at cul-de-sacs,
knuckles and intersections to provide emphasis and interest. .
O
.Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-68
1Vlargarifa Village III. Design ~tudelines
b. Interior Slone Landscape. O
All interior slopes occurring within the community theme walls shall be landscaped
and irrigated per the City of Temecula landscape standazds. The builder/developer
shall install all slopes not designated as common azea. Each builder should confirm
the standazds with the City.
c. Mailboxes
The United States Postal Service requires multiple mailboxes to be located for
residences at central locations. Two (2) flat black U.S. Postal approved mailboxes
or an approved thematic color shall be mounted together on the property line of two
(2) adjacent houses.
Each neighborhood builder shall be required to submit design and layout plans for
Post Office approval of mailbox plans for each tract.
d. MWII) Easement Streetscane
These easement azeas are unique in that the uniform perimeter streetscenes should be maintained
but certain design criteria must be constructed.
The Metropolitan Water District (MWD) easement remains as a naturalistic passive open space.
Minimal grading is conditioned within this easement. Therefore, the landscape will remain native. 1
However, this easement will be fenced as per MWD requirements.
e. Entrv MonumentaNon
Community entries consists of a thematic blend of construction features, landscape features, project
identity signage and specialty lighting that convey the unique image of MARGARTfA VILLAGE. A
hierarchy of project entries reinforces the unique thematic image. The hierazchy consists of major
project entry monumentation and minor project entry monumentation.
1) Major Project Entry Monumentation
A major community entry occurs on Rancho California Road. The overall sense of entry
monument is created by a harmonious blend of thematic features occurring in a formal,
symmetrical configuration on both sides of this roadway including:
• Curvilineaz backdrop stucco and brick cap wall with brick cap pilasters;
•: Low foreground stucco and brick cap planter walls;
• An informal backdrop of Eucalyptus trees with specimen California Pepper or Italian
Stone Pine trees integrated with the foreground wall system; O
• Blend of flowering shrubs, vines, and groundcover; ~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page 1II-69
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
O • Rolling turf grass foreground introducing the streetscene treatment and creating a visual
pazk-like threshold; and,
• Recessed specialty lighting to focus upon and highlight the construction features.
2) Minor Project Entry Monumentation
These minor community entries occur on Meadows Parkway and La Serena Way. These
project entries convey the unique project identity by repetition of significant project entry
monumentation features but will exclude impact of the major project entry monumentation.
The project entries occur on a formal, asymmetrical configuration on both sides of the
roadway and feature:
:• Curvilineaz backdrop stucco and brick cap wall with brick pilasters. This wall may also
form a residential property line perimeter wall;
d• Foreground planter wall may occur on only one side of the roadway;
• An informal backdrop of Eucalyptus trees with either California Pepper or Italian Stone
Pine specimen trees integrated with the wall system;
• Flowering blend of shrubs, vines, and groundcover;
• Recessed specialty lighting which focuses upon and highlights the construction features;
• Optional individual project identification graphics located on one (1) side of the
intersection only; and,
d• Optional temporary sales and directional graphics may be located in the entry
monumentation area. No temporary sales or directional graphics should be mounted on the
entry monumentation construction features.
f. ]Entry Monumentation ]Lighting
All lighting shall conform to the Mount Palomar lighting standards. Electrical meter pedestal and
light switch/control equipment shall be located with minimal public visibility or shall be screened
with appropriate plan materials.
g. Community Walls and ]Fences
All walls which adjoin MARGARITA VILLAGE Homeowner's Association maintained pazcels or
County Service Areas shall be located entirely within such parcels for common maintenance
allowance. Such walls shall be termed `community walls' and shall be designed and installed in
accordance with these standard details.
D
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-70
0
BACKGROUND GROVE TREE -EUCALYPTUS SPECES
LCCENf SHRUBS, VINES AND GROUNDCOVER
90UND STUCCO WALL WfTFI BRICK CAP
RECESSEI
PROJEOT GRAPN7
STUCCO WALL WfTH BRICK CAP ANO BF
ENTRY ACCENT 7NEME TREE -CAI
20' MIN. LANDSCAPE ......-..~ ~~~-~--
ZONE
FIGURE III-32
VILLAGE "B'
O MAJOR PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENTATION
. a q ~ y~~r~~~~n~~ ~Il~Il~~c~
lia 0~ -.......~..4.,_
III-71
M
M
I
W'
2
LL
a
~wnn~
p~J
~w~
0
~p•~
tl
AA~~A
IWI
~qp~
F~
~ y~~ y ~
IuJI
,qy®
~S
0 0
C
C
IWI
~p
J
~~ *~ (~\]
Q'% ~ (~
:V
0
o rnv
~~
0
0
COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE AT UNIT SIDEYARD
ACCENT SHRUBS, VBIES, AND OROUNDCOVER
:O WALL WRH BRCK CAP
FIGURE III-34
VILLAGE "B"
~a q
MINOR PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENTATION
~~~~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
III-73
W
c~
a
L~J
~l
0
V`=
~,
e
vo
e
e
u
0
~~; ~ J
r
Q ~
0
v u.v
•r~
Margarita Village ~. design ~vuidelines
O
1)
Wall Standards/Jurisdiction/Application
Community wall standazds described and detailed herein are intended to apply to all
situations where such walls are visible from public streets, public use areas and common
Homeowner's Association maintenance areas.
Specifically excluded aze: residential rear yard and side yard situations not adjoining a
public street or common use area; single family front yard enclosure fencing and perimeter
fencing for commercial and attached product areas. Wall applications in these areas will
be evaluated for appropriateness with the architectural setting.
a) Solid Wall Base Requirements
Where privacy or protection of common area views dictate, a solid masonry wall
with pilasters shall be used. The wall shall be capped with a combination header
and sailer course pattern of Davidson Brick Company Old Hickory Range standard
face brick. Pilaster constructed of sixteen inch (16") square column block shall
occur at all property lines, changes in vertical and horizontal direction and at other
intervals appropriate to the length of wall run. When designated to be installed on
the property line between two (2) residential properties, the centerline of pilaster
should be positioned on the property line. Pilaster shall be capped with combina-
tion header and sailor course pattern of Davidson Facebrick, Color Old Hickory.
O
J
b) Open/View Wall Base Requirement
Where view opportunity is a premium and where visual protection from common
maintenance azeasis assured, an open or view wall shall be used. The wall or fence
shall be five feet, six inches (5'-6") minimum height constructed between masonry
pilasters. The pilasters shall match those described herein for the base requirement
solid wall treatment inclusive of size, design, configuration and location.
2)
Individual Product Interior Wall/Fence Criteria
a) Product Theme Solid Wall Base Requirements
A uniform solid wall designed to reinforce the architectural setting while remaining
compatible with [he previously described perimeter wall program is encouraged and
should be utilized at selected lots. The visual integrity of the overall neighborhood
streetscene will, therefore, be protected. These uniform thematic solid walls shall
be constructed of masonry or wood materials or a combination of masonry pilasters
with wood fence panels.
O
b) Open View Wall Base Application
Where interior lot view opportunities exist without a privacy conflict, an open view
fence or wall may be appropriate. Such a view fence shall be compatible with the
architectural setting.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-75
i
Q
r
n
r
L
n
Q
J_
1
J
J
n
6
.9-,5 U
_ Y
U
m
W
N
J
a
_. O
a U
U
~'cn
W
U
Z
' W
~. LL
9 ~ .
8 ~ F-
,~ ~ ®po~ ~®~ a0)
•tteyH ..8-, ~
i
r
W
c~
LL
w
U
w
J_
Q
Z
H
W
d
W
w
F-
2
e
e e
I n~
~
A o n
®
J
I
~
° ~ Qo
o my
.d
r
Margarita Village ~. lLDesign ~vuidelines
O h. Parks and Recreation Amenities
1) Introduction
A vaziety of family oriented recreation activities aze planned at MARGARITA VILLAGE.
Master planned is a greenbelt paseo trail spine anchored at both ends with active
neighborhood pazks. The greenbelt paseo serves as a pedestrian circulation feature
connecting various streets with the neighborhood pazks and naturalized open space aeeas.
2) Neighborhood Parks
One neighborhood park (Planning Area 5) is located along Meadows Parkway in the
northeast quadrant of MARGARITA VILLAGE. This pazk site will encompass 11.5 acres. This
pazk will be constructed by the developer and is proposed to be maintained by CSA 143.
Program elements planned aze as follows:
•'• Family picnic areas;
• Basketball half-court;
• Tot lot- Adventure play;
O • Exercise course;
• Sand volleyball court;
• Soccer field overlay;
• Group barbecues; and,
:• Open free play area.
3) Equestrian Trail
A ten (10) foot equestrian trail parallels Meadows Pazkway. This equestrian trail link
connects to a larger regional County and city-wide trail system. This equestrian [rail shall
be constructed by the developer of Village "B"
I. Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility
Maintenance of common areas and streetscenes within MARGARITA VILLAGE shall be provided in
one of two ways:
O ~ A County Service Area may maintain the major perimeter streetscenes adjoining Rancho
California Road, La Serena Way, Meadows Pazkway, and Butterfield Stage Road. This will
specifically include the azea from back of curb to and including the community theme wall.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-77
s
s
e
~
N
W y
j
F
W
W Q N
6
~ W Z
2
W O 1-
W
U Q
r R
U
a i i~
U
Z OU 2
w
w < Ue a
Y
Q Q7 W
d ~ <
4 m
W ~ Y ~
~ --
sEZ ~
/ _. i
w
c~
b
ti
2Z
O
~O
LL~
6
WQ
OQ
t Uf
W 0~
Q -~W
6 R 6 7Q
> J ¢ ~Z
~ O 6 O Ur6
w ~ U O U LL Fs
rc ¢ a LL u 3~
~ ~ m a ' r
O
W U j W ~ N mN ~
W J W
y i O O LL N v=iLL N
~ ~.Z~
1 ~~•
`'`~'~~ ,.~,~c.
0
v .Y J_ /
~' ® /
~g3tlig
n
V /
~~I
_a
6.5e
0 0
C
S
F
}
~ Qo
0
v
AtlMNtltld tl3SItlN
_. ...._.
Margarita Village ' ][][][.. design guidelines
o If these perimeter streetscenes aze not accepted for maintenance by the County Service Area,
~ MARGARITA VILLAGE Community Association will maintain these areas.
In either case, the Community Homeowner's Association will maintain the major interior
neighborhood streetscenes. Major internal neighborhood slopes, major slopes paralleling the
easement areas and the utility company easement aeeas will be Homeowner's Association
maintained.
The utility company easement azea encompasses the north south water lines for the Metropolitan
Water District. It is anticipated that maintenance will consist of once or twice yearly grass/weed
mowingand trash iemoval by MARGARITA VILLAGE Homeowner's Association.
L.ow to moderately high slopes located within the interior residential neighborhoods and on fenced
private lots aze the individual homeowner's maintenance responsibility. The builder will install
erosion control planting as necessary per the City of Temecula standards and maintain these slopes
only until the homes are owner occupied.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-79
1Vlargarita Village ~. ][Design ~auidelines
~T ny
41. V' Hlll`~gH' 66~" IL~Hndlsc~~nHng 1f~~a~aunH~eH>rnem>rs
a. Project streetscenes
The landscape development associated with the streetscenes along Mazgarita Road, La Serena Way,
Rancho California Road, Meadows Pazkway, Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, and Pauba
Road is uniform and consistent with the existing City of Temecula community .wide streetscenes.
As a general guideline to the landscape treatment of the planting areas throughout the project, the
landscape character of the above referenced major streetscenes is presented herein. Refer to the
appropriate plan view and elevation exhibits for graphic presentation of the following descriptions:
1) Major and Secondary Landscape Streetscene Landscape Development
The landscape development associated with the perimeter project streetscenes along
Mazgarita Road, La Serena Way, Rancho California Road, Meadows Pazkway, Butte~eld
Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, and Pauba Road consists of:
• Informal street tree groupings;
• Evergreen background and deciduous accent grove trees;
•'• Project thematic masonry wal] or combination masonry wall and tubulaz steel fence with ~
pilasters; and,
•'r A hierazchy of entry monumentation.
2) Project Entry Accent Trees
California Pepper (Schinus molle) and Italian Stone Pine(Pinus pinea) are the primary
evergreen canopy theme trees utilized at points ofproject emphasis throughout MARGARITA
VILLAGE. AS Such, they represent foreground specimen accent trees at major and minor
project entry monumentation features. These trees are also repeated at significant points
throughout the community. Such applications logically include street intersections and
changes in street direction where a reinforcement of the project theme tree will be
recognized and will serve a functional purpose.
3) Evergreen Background Grove Trees
Eucalyptus species and Pine trees aze utilized as informal vertical evergreen background
grove trees on slopes along major perimeter streetscenes. The Aleppo Pine is not planted
along Rancho California Road. These trees may be used to block or to frame views.
Wherever possible and logical, these evergreen grove trees aze extended from primary
streetscenes into planting areas as background trees in order to provide visual transitions and
to unify the different pazcels.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-80
~~
a
\J ~
! w ~ m
w ~
H
uWi i
~ ~ ~~~~
Q
°~~ ~
`~~ a ~~~ N~~~~~~~
~~ ~ ~ ~
Z=
00
w
~z
g ~ Ng
I- 2 0
' S ~~
~ C
u
r 3 N
w w a w
y~ ~ O. 3 b
n a
rc i ~ o
w o; ~a yq
O ~g''~ t i N
~ _aLi b
cv
M
1
W
C7
LL
r/-~_.
~ ~~
i
i
i. ~~.:
(~I'
~,
~,
,`r'
~~
M
e
a
~.
V
00
0
~?
'-1
.,
0
Q~
vrnv
~ c~
~ W
: €
~' ~ W
W
N Vi
F ~ b
YI W ~ ~y ~ ~ J ~ 6
~ ~ ~ N
~~~ y~ ~ ~~~~`ppp~~
~~a~~ a ~~~ y~ ~~~~
~ ~ ~ s ~ a Q
~~~Qm ~tJ~t~P~oa. Oo~~~j ~
C> O
im;m
z
0 z
0
>~
a
i
w - ~
~{
~ ~
i yy
I q Sl
g fi ~ U
~ ~
~ i
~ m'ID~
-
ee~~
~
U
w ~p~{
w
U ~ ~ ¢<
F w
N
..
. -~
~ m ~\
i~ -
, ;
F
~ a ~ ~ ~
a~i
z ~
s:
z F
~ ~
f
f ~ ~ ~~ ~~
`~~~
l
~
~
~ 1
~
~ I
~ ?
~
® _
c~
,
, , e
1 _
®
__m
~m
I~ 33
I¢
.~~
m'®'m~®',Ci~'Im,[~
:.. ~ _ _ -
-~- ~ ,,
o,
--
m m m m ~. m m ' -~- r
~__
~ ~ I
Q11m'm ~Q i
I]'' m I m / $
~- - s
_~ 9
Si - ~ys
~~. ~. m-- - -_
® ~ _ _ f
s~~~~ . m ~i ~--0.T:s3 S
m o. --- - ~_ .fl m- • m -
m I m
__~ ~. m ~ , m _m m
~f~~m .~ . ~ a'a
i
~~
m m/ral ~, m ~ _ p4~
.. \ ~' ~ m m ~y Q ~
ID ~ a ~'
C~ ~,
,m
M
C
W
LL'
a
a' o
6
~C p n
ICI
~p
II
LSo
r~
v c~
~~
w
0
v
i
w
~.,
Z x
O O
a a
2
°s °a
6
f
W W
u v
a
o y a
of 3O3
g 5 5
T
l,y
w
~ ~n
'~~
4
Q
6
y~ FN
~`YUtyl W
N N
s
g ~ ~
~a~o~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~
~~ ~~~~~~y~~s~~~~~~~~~
J 3 O eq
y~ ((nn ' O ~ <
a
a
a
0
0
P gVgp
V
~1
~~qp
~/
o~
~w`y~
V
0 0
C
C
o a c^
7l
s
M
~CC
F~
~o
vrnv
~~
~-
. ,,
\~k~~
~.,
_;
e
P
< :; ~
~ ~~"~~ ~
~~
W Q
~~I~_~Ib IM-
~~
~~ ~ ~~~
~I a ~~~~~ ~~~s~~~~i
~~~ ~pmoQ~;,::p~oa~ooo~~J
w
s
q~
a
q~
1'AeT
`A~\/~
V V
w
A~
lA\a
lCA\V~
V V
\A®\ InI
O V
~J
I ~J
00
s
Q~
0
o x,v
•~
E
n
Z
O
F Z
O
F
a a
z
O
f O N
f J ~
R 2
V
Q
~
W S 6
~ ~
W ; O
F
W W
z
LL LL
,,
O
Z
F
V
~ ~
`~' a
y
zW,
W
Q a
F
Z
O F
~
' O
a
p 3 O ~ 3
gg i
~ ~ ,
~
w
~ y
a
J Z S
7 ~ x
N N ~ a
~
W
N
O 3
`~ °. N
~ i ~
N xa a
a ~ S ~
W
N ~
~
4 L
I b
~ ^
'
N `-0 .
~ N
f W
S C
W 1.
U ~
V W
l
2 V
U
W
IA V N
w m o
e
~'+ ~
Z U
O p
~ u ~ ~ ~ r
W e g
N N H
6 j
$ `__ 3 ~ ~ ~g g 4
m a
~®®~ ~ ~ ~0
N
u ~ 3 W i
W N w
g W N W ggN N
F ~ i 3 k
~~ ~ ~ H~ 3
~ ~
~ o
N 3 K
7Q
gyag
2}
W
Y
N
a
C
2
LL
b tl
O
O
~~
V
Ip~
Y
a ,~
0~1
0 0
C
yC y ~
~ ~ u
~.
~p
~Jp
e~J
`v/
0
o xv
.d
Q
y
~
_
Q
W ~
W ~
~ ~
<
3
Y~1
2 ZLL
W
~
u
J
J
Z
q ~
u a
=
ffi. s
g
a
~
>
~ u
r~
~ H
~
~ w r
§ ~ x
~
~ ~
F
(~ o ~9 !
~i 3 vii ~ $
~ S i
~ ~ ' ~ I b ! C oo
. .
K
L~ ~ u
G7 N
~ g
~ B
W
~ ~gg~~g^ ~Q~~~~~~~~
V, o a P ~€ 3~~ 3 ~ u H
S c'S
a
M
<T
I
W
Q
LL
Q
p~
U
oe
~.
~J
Q~
0
v ¢.,v
.d
~ gg
u
3
F
${tl
6
N
~~ g~ ~a „ N
~~~ ~
~~~i
~ ~I ~~o ~~~ oo o®®~~}
o ~
a
u
s
(c
~
~ W
~ ~
t
i u µ,
~ z
~ W
`u
G
g
i ;
'JQ ~
d
'
~ a
: ~ N
QF
VI. GI 3,
5~ [
Si 5N
a $
~ S ~ 3 W N
~ ~I ' ~ I o I I Mo;~
_ .
_ .
E
q~
k
I
W
C7
LL.
d tl
L'J
Aw
t7
~.
a
~a
o v
C
~~L pp ~~
IuJI
~p
9
0
~~'±,
,}
n
W
ti
H
o'
crnv.
.d
Margarita Village l[][l[. design ~vuidelines
a
4)
5)
6)
b.
Deciduous Accent Trees _ .
London Plane (Platanus acerifolia) and Sweetgum (Liquidambarstyracijlua) azedeciduous
accent trees occurring in random groupings among the evergreen background grove trees.
These trees provide visual highlights and seasonal interest among the evergreen trees.
Informal Street Tree Groupings
Street trees occur in random informal groupings along the major and secondary highway
landscape streetscenes. These medium scale uniform trees serve a deciduous foreground
elements providing summer shade and permitting welcome. winter sun. Other applications
of these trees include interior residential street trees or as informal grove trees in the Long
Valley greenbelddrainage comdor adjacent to Rancho California Road.
Each major perimeter project streetscene has as single street tree variety identifying that
street. This also aids in unifying the various neighborhoods which occur along each
streetscene.
Perimeter Project Street Trees
STREET TREES
Margarita Road
La Serena Way
Rancho California Road
Butterfield Stage Road
Meadows Parkway
Rancho Vista Road.
Pauba Road
Plant Materials Palette
PLANT PALETTE
Pinus halepensis (Aleppo Pine)
Alnus rhombifolia (White Alder)
Platanus acerifolia (London Plane Tree)
Pistacia chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
Ceratonia siliqua (Carob)
Albizia julibrissin (Mimosa Tree)
Pinus halepensis (Aleppo Pine)
Schinus mole (Califomia Pepper)
It is the intent of these guidelines to provide flexibility and diversity in plant material selection,
while maintaining a limited palette in order to give greater unity and thematic identity to the
community. The plant material lists have been selected for their appropriateness to the project
theme, climatic conditions, soil conditions and concern for maintenance.
A limited selection of materials utilized in simple, significant composition complimentary to
adjacent common landscape areas, while reinforcing the individual architectural and site setting, is
encouraged.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-88
Margarita,Village ~. ][Design QIIuidelines
Overall plant material selection for given project areas, wherever possible, shall have compatible
drought resistant characteristics. Irrigation programming can then be designed to minimize water
. application for the entire landscaping setting.
The limited plant material selection for common landscape aeeas associated with MARGARTCA
VILLAGE as described in the text is contained in the following palette. In addition, a wider variety
of plant materials compatible with the project. theme-,and setting. is ,listed for use by Builder
Landscape Architects in the selection of materials for model home complex developments, patio
home common azeas,.etc.
BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Trees -Evergreen _
Arbutus unedo Strawberry Tree
Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree '
Cedrus deodara Deodaz Cedar
Eucalyptus po[yanthemos Red Box Gum
Eucalyptus sideroxylon `Rosea' Red Iron Bark
Eucalyptus viminalis White Gum
Eucalyptus rudis Desert Gum
Magnolia grandiflora Southern Magnolia.
Olea europaea `Fruitless' Fruitless Olive
Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine
Pinus halepensis/Pinus eldarica Aleppo Pine '
Pinus pinea Italian Stone Pine
Podocarpus gracilior Fem Pine
Quercus agrifolia California Live Oak
Quercus ilex Holly Oak
Schinus mope California Pepper
Ulmus parvifolia `Drake' Evergreen Elm
Trees -Deciduous
Albizia julibrissin Mimosa Tree
Alnus rhombifolia White Alder
Betula alba White Birch
Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash
Fraxinus uhdei `Tomlinson' Tomlinson Ash
Gingko biloba Maidenhair Tree
Gleditsia tricanthos 'Shade Master' Honey Locus[
Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree
Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree
Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle
a
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-89
Margarita Village- l[~. ][Design guidelines
~/ BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
Liquidambar styraciflua Sweet Gum
Morus alba `Fruitless' Fruitless Mulberry
Nyssa sylvatica Sour Gum
Platanus acerifolia London Plane Tree
Platanus racemosa California Sycamore
Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache
Salix babylonica Weeping Willow
Zelkova serrulata Chinese Zelkova
Shrubs
Abelia 'Edward Goucher' (S) Edward Goucher
*Acacia ongerup (S)~ No Common Name
*Acacia redolens (S) No Common Name
Berberis species (S, SH) Bazberry
Camellia species (SH) Camellia
Cocculus laurifolius (S} Snailseed
Cotoneasterspecies(S) Cotoneaster
Elaeagnus pungens (S) Silver Berry
Euonymus fortunei (S) No Common Name
Euonymus japonica (S) Evergreen Euonymus
Ilex species (SH) Holly
Leptospermum scoparium (S) New Zealand Tea Tree
Ligustrum japonica (S, SH) Japanese Privet
Nandina domestics and "Compacts" (S, Heavenly Bamboo
SH)
Nerium oleander (S) Oleander
Osmantus fragrans (S, SH) Sweet Olive
Photinia fraseri (S) Photinia
Pittosporum tobira (S, SH) and Mock Orange
Pittosporum tobira `Wheelers DwazF (S,
SH)
Podocarpus macrophyllus (S, SH) Yew Pine
Prunus caroliniana (S) Cazolina Laurel Cherry
Prunus ilicifolia (S) Hollyleaf Cherry
Pyracantha species (S, SH) Firethorn
Raphiolepis indica species (S, SH)
plebe coed (S, SH) Pink Indian Hawthorn
Veronica
Ternstroemia gymnanthera (SH) No Common Name
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-90
Margarita. Village ~. lLDesign guidelines
BOTANICAL NAME ~ ~ COMMON NAME
Xylosma congesrum (S) Xylosma
Sub Shrubs
*Agapanthus africanus (S, SH) Lily of the Nile
Arctostaphylos species (S) Manzanita
Dietes bicolor (S) Fortnight Lily
Hemerocallis species (S) Day Lily
Juniperus species (S) Juniper
Lonicera japonica 'Haliana' (S) Hall's Honeysuckle
Trache[ospermum jasminoides (S, SH) Staz Jasmine
Vines
Doxantha unguis-cati (S) Cat's Claw Vine
Ficus pumila (S, SH) Creeping Fig-
Gelsemium sempervirens (S) Cazolina Jasmine
Jasminum mesyni (S) Primrose Jasmine
Jasminum polyanthum (S) No Common Name
Parthenocissus tricuspidata (SH) Boston Ivy
Wisteria floribunda (S) Wisteria
Groundcovers (~./)
Baccharis pilularis `Twin Peaks' (S) Coyote Brush
Duchesnea indica (S, SH) Indian Mock Strawberry
*Hedera helix (SH) English Ivy
Hypericum calycinum (S) Aazon's Beazd
Lonicera japonica (S) Honeysuckle
Myoporum parvifolium (S) Myoporum
Potentilla verna (S, SH) Spring Cinquefoil
Rosemarinus off~cinalis (S) Rosemary
*Will freeze in unprotected exposure azea but will generally rejuvenate from undamaged
parts. Use with caution:
S - Tolerates sun in this planting zone.
SH - Tolerates shade in this planting zone.
1. Year-Around Turf Grass Mix
Ninety percent (90%) Festuca arundinaceae -ten (10) pounds per one thousand (1,000)
squaze feet; ten percent (10%) Kentucky Bluegrass.
2. Suitable Seasonal Turf Grass Mixes ~";
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-91
Margarita Village ~. ][Design guidelines
Q
C. StreetSCBAe
Streetscape or streetscenes include the combination of landscape and hazdscape features visible from
a given roadway. These features generally include the project wall at the boundary of adjoining land
use described elsewhere; the project sidewalk, `Edison' street light fixtures, entry monumentarion
wall features described elsewhere, traffic control and directional'signage.
There aze two (2) levels of streetscene at MARGARITA VILLAGE: major and secondary highway
perimeter streets and residential neighborhood streets. -There aze two (2) exceptions to this
streetscene which occur along Rancho Califomia Road and the MWD easement pazalleling
Mazgarita Road. These exceptions have greenbelt occumng in them.
Eleven (11) and twelve (12) foot parkways occur on the perimeter streetscenes. On
the above mentioned stteets, a standazd five foot six inches (5'-6") walk adjoins the
street curb. There aze varying height slopes which begin at the pazkway right-of-
way. Groundcover is planted between the edge of sidewalk and the toe of slope.
The street trees and background trees meander from the edge of sidewalk and up the
slopes.
1)
Common Betmuda (Cynodon dactylon)
Hybrid Bermuda
The planting time will vary for these types as Bermuda grass should not be planted during
its dormant season.
Major and Secondary I3ighway Perimeter Streetscene
Major and secondary highway perimeter streetsceries with uniform thematic treatment
include Mazgarita Road, La Serena Way, Rancho California Road, Meadows Pazkway,
Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, and Pauba Road.
a) Pazkwavs
b) Slopes
Slopes adjoining the perimeter streets are mainly 2:1. All the slopes aze planted
with a combination of drought resistant, erosion control groundcover and trees. The
shrubs aze planted a maximum of ten (10) feet on center but no tall shrubs are to be
planted within ten (10) vertical feet of a community view wall. Fast Bowing
Eucalyptus trees aze kept clustered neaz property lines to avoid obstructing any reaz
yazd views.
2)
Each single family residential lot in MARGARITA VILLAGE shall receive a minimum
Residential Neighborhood Streetscape
a) Required Residential Lot Street Trees
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-92
Vi
SID[.
of one (1), fifteen (15) gallon size street trees also planted in'the right-of--way. In
addition, comer lots shall receive a minimum of two (2), fifteen (IS) gallon size
street trees also planted on the right-of--way. Tree variety shall be chosen from
MARGARITA VILLAGE Tree Palette contained herein. One (1) species of tree shall
be selected and approved for each residential street to maximize visual neighbor-
hood identity. Deciduous or flowering evergreen accent trees which contrast with
the chosen street tree aze encouraged at cul-de-sacs, knuckles, and intersections to
provide emphasis and interest.
b) Interior Slone Landscace
All interior slopes occurring within the community theme walls shall be landscaped
and irrigated per the City of Temecula landscape standazds. The builder/developer
shall install all slopes,not designated as common area. Each builder should confirm
the standazds with the City.
c) Mailboxes
The United States Postal Service requires multiple mailboxes to be located for
residences at central locations. Two (2) flat black U.S. Postal approved mailboxes
or an approved thematic color shall be mounted together on the property line of two
(2) adjacent houses.
Each neighborhood builder shall be required to submit design and layout plans for
Post Office approval of mailbox plans for each tract.
d. Commercial Use Landscape Requirements
1) Street Tree Requirements
a) Evergreen background grove trees should surround the commercial site integrating
the site into overall community setting.
b) Visual windows into the commercial project should be created by massing the grove
trees on perimeter streetscenes.
c) Sideyazd and rear service yard use areas should be screened with a combination of
a six foot (6') wall and a dense landscape buffer.
2) Minimum Landscape Requirements
a) A minimum fifteen percent (15%) of the gross commercial site acreage shall be
landscaped.
b) All areas of the site not occupied by buildings or otherwise utilized shall be
landscaped with groundcover, turf or tree materials from the community plant list.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-93
4' MIN. LANDSCAPE
SHRUB AND GROUN
BUFFER PLANTING
SOLID PROJECT MA;
WALL WITH PILASTE
LANDSCAPE f1FVFl f
Note: This cross-section
exists along Rancho Califor-
nia Road (P.A. 32a), Rancho
Vista Road (P.A. 14) and
Butterfield Stage Road (P.A.
13). See Figures III-38,
III-39, and III-44.
a
.
a q
0
_ ~ ~ ."..._...~.._
iFORMAL STREET TREE GROUPINGS
URF PARKWAY
'- 6' SIDEWALK PARALLEL TO STREET
FIGURE III-45
VILLAGE "C'
SECTION A-1 fiNAJOR AND SECONDARY
HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE -FLAT CONDITION:
~~r~~~rr?n~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
III-94
EVERGREEN BACKGROUND -
GROVE TREES WITH DECIDUOUS
ACCENT TREES
SLOPE LANDSCAPING WITH GROUNDCOVER
FROM FLATS AND CONTAINER SHRUBS
SHRUBS PLANTED SUFFICIENTLY DOWN THE SLOPE
TO PRESERVE VIEWS
OF SLOPE
SIDEWALK
PROJECT THEME WALL WITH MASONRY
PILASTERS AND TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
WALL/FENCE
SET BACK 1'
Note: This cross-section
will occur along Rancho
California Road (P.A. 30),
Rancho Vista Road (P.A. 13,
15, 20, 22, 27, 29), Pauba
Road (P.A. 16), Kaiser Park-
way (P.A. 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
20, 21) and Butterfield Stage
Road (P.A. 13, 15, 16). See
Figures III-38, III-39,
III-40, III-41, III-42,
III-43 and III-44.
12'
R.O.W.
N.T.S.
FIGURE III-46
VILLAGE "C'
SECTION A-2 MAJOR AND SECONDARY. HIGHWAY
a LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE -SLOPE CONDITIOf~I
.p o q IK~N1.>~ ~~r~~~r~n~~ ~nIlIl~~~
Lla ~e -_...s.,e._
III-95
Q
EVERGREEN BACKGROUND GROVE
WffH OECmUOUS ACCENT TREES
3'-~8' EQUESTRIAN TRAL
PRO.ECT THEME MASONRY PILASTER
WITH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE
NB~ERT/ DRAWAGE
I!W ACCENT TREES
IPNGS TREET TREE
YALK MEANDER ZONE
SIDEWAU(-MEANDERS
15'MW. AT FACE OF
TO 10' MPL FROM TOP
iAWAGE CORRIDOR
E
PARKWAY
~+J
IS' WIDE EQUESTRIAN TRALL EASEMENT
Note: This cross-section
will occur along Rancho
California Road (P.A. 13).
See Figure III-38.
100' MIN.
VARIABLE WIDTH
FIGURE III-4Z
VILLAGE 'C'
Q
~~ ~
SECTION B EQUESTRIAN TRAIL, GREENBELT CORRIDOR &
ARTERIAL HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE
V~c~1~'~~1pI1{~c~1 ~Il~~c~1~C~
III-96
GREENBELT DRAPJAGE CORRmOR
4:1 MA% SLOPE
SLOPE LANDSCAPI
FROM FLATS AND
EVERGREEN BACKGROUND GROVE TREES
WTfN DECOUOUS ACCENT TREES
PROJECT THEME MASONRY PILASTER
WRH 7UBU_AR S7T3=L FENCE
1/
R~ARIAN ACCENT TREES
3'- 6' EQUESTRIAN FENCE
EOUESTRVW TRAL JOGGS
d' MRL AWAY FROM SmEWpLK
TO 3' MPL FROM TOP OF SLOPE
EQUESTRIAN TRAIL JOGGING ZONE
TURF PARKWAY
PJFORMAL STREET TREE GROUPPl0.S
5'-8' SmEWALK BACK OF CURB
1
SLOPE
Note: This cross-section
will occur along Rancho
California Road (P.A. 21).
See Figure III-42.
TS'
'FIGURE III-48
VILLAGE "C" : .
SECTION C EQUESTRIAN TRAIL, GREENBELT CORRIDOR, MAJOR &
SECONDARY HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE STREET SCENE
y~~r~~~~n~~ ~IlIlIl~~c~
p.aq ~ ~
Ll a ~~ - _._r..a._
III-97
EVERGREEN BACKGROUND GROVE
WITH DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREES
PROJECT THEME MASONRY PILASTER
Wf(H TUBULAR STEEL FFNCE
EQUESTAIAN TRA4
EQUESTRIAN FENCE
STREET TREE GROUPMGS
'-~:~` .~
h
O
Note: This cross-section
will occur along Rancho
California Road (P.A. 14,
24). See Figures III-39,
III-42.
t~
2
S' SmEWALK BAGK OF CURB
FIGURE III-49
VILLAGE 'C"
o
c q
SECTION D EQUESTRIAN TRAIL AT MAJOR AND
SECONDARY HIGHWAY LANDSCAPE STREET SCENES.
~~~~~~n~~ ~InIlIl~~~
in-9s
Margarita Village ][l[l[. ][Design Q~auidelines
3) Parking Areas
a) Pakking azea landscaping is required for the screeriing of lazge pazking azeas to limit
their visual impact.
b) Landscaped islands shall be provided at the ends of interior stall rows to break up
parking azeas. Creation of large planting islands (tree groves) is encouraged as
opposed to small pockets of individual trees:
c) Landscape shall conform to City of Temecula pazking and landscaping standazds.
d) The use of islands to create a series of smaller parking pockets within the total
pazking azea is required.
e) When parking is located adjacent to a public street, a combination of landscaped
berms and/or planting should be used to screen views of parked cars.
f} Wherever possible, pedestrian traffic should be separated from vehiculaz traffic by
additional sidewalk. The pazking lot should.have crosswalks highlighted with
decorative or varied texture paving.
e. Apartment ~][ousing d,andscape IItequirement
Landscaping is a critical element in achieving an overall quality of life in multi-family density
housing. The following criteria shall apply to the following:
1) Pedestrian and vehiculaz circulation shall be cleazly defined with a landscape treatment.
2) Carports and pazking stalls shall be screened and softened with landscape planters.
3) Project entry drives should be designed to provide an overview of -the landscape and
recreational facilities.
4) Trash bins should be fully enclosed with six (6) foot stucco walls with metal gates and shall
be screened with landscape buffers.
5) Trash bin locations should be conveniently located for ease of maintenance and trash
locations. Recommended locations include inside parking courts or at the end of parking
bays.
6) Maximize turf areas and minimize shrub areas to provide greater usable landscape azeas and
for ease of maintenance.
a
7) Conform to City of Temecula landscape standazds.
8) All applicable general residential neighborhood streetscene requirements shall apply.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-99
Margarita. Village ~. design Q~uidelines
9) Wherever possible, canopy trees should be utilized to shade and mitigate the summer heat.
10) Meandering or jogging sidewalks aze encouraged.
11) Plant material shall shade western sides of buildings, especially windows to reduce heat gain
inside homes.
12) Plant material should form a smooth transition between neighborhood and streetscene
landscaping.
f. Edison/NIWID Easement Streetscane
These easement areas aze unique in that the uniform perimeter streetscenes should be maintained
but certain design criteria must be considered.
Trees and shrubs should have shallow root systems in order to be planted in the gas easement. Trees
must be planted a minimum of fifteen (15) feet away from the centerline of the actual gas pipe
location. As the gas pipe location is rather shallow and varies within the easement, caution is urged
when working within these easements.
Where the Edison easement travels between two (2) single family residences, the builder is
encouraged to plant fast growing Eucalyptus tree groves in the rear yazds. These groves are
suggested to mitigate the impact of the Edison transmission poles and lines.
The Metropolitan Water District easementYemains as a naturalistic passive open space. Minimal
grading is conditioned within this easement. Therefore, the landscape will remain native and act as
an equestrian trail corridor.
g. Greenbelt/~rainage Corridor
Pazalleling Rancho California Road is the Long Valley greenbelbdrainagecnrridor. The greenbelt
varies in width from the back of curb to the top of channel. A standazd five foot, six inch (5'-6")
sidewalk is either parallel to the curb or meanders along throughout the greenbelt depending upon
whether an equestrian trail adjoins the sidewalk. The greenbelt also functions as an equestrian
transportation condor. The equestrian trail meanders on either side of the drainage corridor.
Mounded turf grass occurs along the greenbelt where space is also planted with moveable turf.
h. Entry 1Vlonumentation
Community entries consists of a thematic blend of construction features, landscape features, project
identity signage and specialty lighting that convey the unique image of MARGARITA VILLAGE.
The design of the project entries must also harmonize with and reinforce the lazger City of Temecula
thematic identity.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-100
Margarita Village ~1C. Design Q~uidelines
1) Minor Project Entry Monumentation
These minor community entries occur on Rancho California Road, Meadows Pazkway, Ia
Serena Way, Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista Road, and Pauba Road. These project
entries convey the unique project identity by repetition of significant community entry
monumentation features. The project entries occur in a formal, asymmetrical configuration
on both sides of the roadway and feature:
• Curvilineaz backdrop stucco and brick cap wall with brick pilasters. This wall may also
form a residential property line perimeter wall;
• Foreground planter wall may occur on only one side of the roadway;
:• An informal backdrop of Eucalyptus trees with either California Pepper or Italian Stone
Pine specimen trees integrated with the wall system;
• Flowering blend of shrubs, vines, and groundcover;
• Recessed specialty lighting which focuses upon and highlights the construction features;
• Optional individual project identification graphics located on one (1) side of the
intersection only; and,
• Optional temporary sales and directional graphics may be located in the entry
monumentation azea. No temporary sales or directional graphics should be mounted on the
entry monumentation construction features.
2) Entry Monumentation Lighting
All lighting shall conform to the Mount Palomar lighting standazds. Electrical meter
pedestal and light switch control equipment shall be located with minimum public visibility
or shall be screened with appropriate plant materials.
i. Community Walls and Fences
All walls which adjoin MARGARITA VILLAGE Homeowner's Association maintained pazcels or
County Service Areas shall be located entirely within such parcels for common maintenance
allowance. Such walls shall be termed `community walls' and shall be designed and installed in
accordance with these standazd details.
1) Wall Standards/Jurisdiction/Application
Community wall standards described and detailed herein are intended to apply to all
situations where such walls aze visible from public streets, public use areas and common
Homeowner's Association maintenance areas.
a
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-101
COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE AT UNR SmEVARD
ACCENT SNRUDS, VWES, AND GROUNDCOVER
a w~i ~ wrtw wwrx c~a
FIGURE III-50
.o q
~a ~~ ,e,.,~.,,~_
VILLAGE "C"
MINOR PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENTATION.
~~p~~r~n~~ ~nIlIl~~c~
III-102
T
W
Q
/~
Y
LL
0
p~
~pI
p'~l
-~^~--
0
6 0~
~--'1
Y
InI~InI
1~!
Y
1 1~nn
~pJp
O
b
e o
C
C
®~
~O
~~ ~~
1
ti
H
0
v~v
.d
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
Specifically excluded are: residential rear yazd and side yazd situations not adjoining a
public street or common use area; single family front yard enclosure fencing and perimeter
fencing for commercial and attached product azeas. Wall applications in these azeas will be
evaluated for appropriateness with the azchitectural setting. Refer to the individual product
interior wall/fence criteria portion of these standazds.
a) Solid Wall Base Requirements
Where privacy or protection of common area views dictate, a solid masonry wall
with pilasters shall be used. The wall shall be capped with a combination header
and sailor course pattem of Davidson Brick Company Old Hickory Range standazd
face brick. Pilaster constructed of sixteen (16) inch squaze column block shall occur
at all property lines, changes in vertical and horizontal direction and at other
intervals appropriate to the length of wall run. When designated to be installed on
the property line between two (2) residential properties, the centerline of pilaster
should be positioned on the property line. Pilaster shall be capped with combination
header and sailor course pattern of Davidson Facebrick, Color Old Hickory.
b) Open/View Wall Base Requirement
Where view opportunity is a premium and where visual protection from common
maintenance azeas is assured, an open or view wall shall be used. The wall or fence
shall be five feet, six inches (5'-6") minimum height constructed between masonry
pilasters. The pilasters shall match those described herein for the base requirement
solid wall treatment inclusive of size, design, configuration, and location.
2) Individual Product Interior Wa1UFence Criteria
a) Product Theme Solid Wall Base Requirements
A uniform solid wall designed to reinforce the architectural setting while remaining
compatible with the previously described perimeter wall program is encouraged and
should be utilized at selected lots. The visual integrity of the overall neighborhood
streetscene will, therefore, be protected. These uniform thematic solid walls shall
be constructed of masonry or wood materials or a combination of masonry pilasters
with wood fence panels.
b) Open View Wall Base Anolication
Where interior lot view opportunities exist without a privacy conflict, an open view
fence or wall may be appropriate. Such a view fence shall be compatible with the
azchitectural setting.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-104
C
' - '; ~ 's
w~ _
~"v ~ ~ ~~ o
.. U
alo ~ \ `m
0 ~ ~ L
' ~ ...
.y. ~6~..: ~~ ~ .
.e. ,k k
~'"• STUCCO WALL & PILASTER W/ BRICK CAP
,,
FIGURE III-52
VILLAGE "C"
.FENCE DETAILS
. a q ~ ~~~~~~Il~~ ~In~Il~~~
liv ~~ ...___..~._
III-105
TUM3ULAR STEEL FENCE W/STUCCO PILASTER & BRICK CAP
Margarita Village l[][I[. design guidelines
j. Parks and Recreation Amenities
1) Introduction
A variety of family oriented recreation activities are planned at MARGnerrn VILLAGE.
Master planned are two (2) distinctively different pazks, one (1) park is an active
neighborhood park adjacent to an elementary school. The other park is a project passive
naturalized park. In addition, the greenbelt/drainage comdor serves as a passive recreation
corridor connecting various neighborhoods.
2) Neighborhood Park
The neighborhood park (Planning Area 18) is located along Meadows. Parkway in the
southeast quadrant of MARGARITA VILLAGE in conjunction with an elementary school. This
park size will encompass four (4) acres. It will be constructed by the developer and is
proposed to be maintained by CSA 143. Program elements planned are as follows:
S Softball field;
•'• Family picnic areas;
• Basketball court;
• Soccer field overlay;
:• Adventure play;
• Off-sVeet parking;
• Group barbeques; and,
• Open free play area.
3) Passive Recreation Park
This nine (9) acre passive recreation park (Planning Area 38) is located along La Serena
Way along a utility easement and near medium density housing. It is anticipated that the
size and nature of this park will draw project wide use. In addition to passive pazk uses, an
existing satellite dish cable television antenna will remain and will be fenced and screened
from view. This park will be constructed by the developer and is proposed to be maintained
by CSA 143. Program elements planned are as follows:
• Adventure play;
°. Jogging trail;
•S Exercise stations;
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-]06
Margarita Village ][I[l[. l[Design guidelines
• Group bazbecues;
:• Open play area; and,
• Family picnic azea.
k. ]Landscape Area Maintenance Responsibility
Maintenance of common azeas and streetscenes within MARGARITA VILLAGE shall be provided in
one of two ways:
A County Service Area may maintain the major perimeter streetscenes adjoining Rancho California
Road, Margarita Road, La Serena Way, Meadows Parkway, Butterfield Stage Road, Rancho Vista
Road, and Pauba Road. This will specifically include the azea from back of curb to and including
the community theme wall.
If these perimeter streetscenes are not accepted for maintenance by the County Service Area,
MARGARITA VILLAGE Community Association will maintain these areas.
In either case, the Community Homeowner's Association will maintain the major interior
neighborhood streetscenes. Major internal neighborhood slopes, major slopes paralleling the
easement areas and the utility company easement azeas will be Homeowner's Association
maintained.
The utility company easement areas encompasses the north/south lines for the Edison power pole `---~
line and Metropolitan Water District. It is anticipated that maintenance will consist of once or twice
yearly grass/weed mowing and trash removal by MARGARITA V<1.LAGE Homeowner's Association.
Low to moderately high slopes located within the interior residential neighborhoods and on fenced
private lots are the individual homeowner's maintenance responsibility. The builder will install
erosion control planting as necessary per the City of Temecula standards and maintain these slopes
only until the homes are owner occupied.
5. Mnsceflfla>me®ans l~fla>m>tn>rng asuundefln>mes (~~p~fln~s >t®aflfl ~nflIlages)
a. fl'lanting Time
Because of the climate extremes of the Temecula area, the installation of plant materials during the
coldest winter months (December through March) and the hottest summer/fall months (July through
September) can be difficult. Container plant materials may not be acclimated to the area, and may
suffer from cold temperatures or sun/heat exposure. The end result may be a partial or entire loss
of foliage even though such materials are perfectly suited to the temperature ranges once established.
If planting must be done during these difficult periods, a plant establishment may be difficult, and
may recognize a prolonged period of time.
Q
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-107
O
O
U t
N a
~ J
a n
z z
~ a
U o O
N
w
W
H
W
N
W
¢ O
c~~ x
V
Gr N
Z
W OU a
a
y (7a W O
w ~
a a a a v
.
, ?
~Q
W' o
~ ~
LL
~ ~~
O
W
O
ri
H
w Z w
F W Q
~ H
a F,
z
U W W
U U
a > U
Y J a
a a
a w
a ¢ z
W 2 U
~ > W
> a O
W W
W
8
8
Pp~_gp
~!'
0 0
6
`i
ys ;~ .
NJ S[
(~ ~~
110
o vmv
~r~
~~
W
W
Q
W~
W z
~ W
n
w
W U
U
W
X Z
W ~
W
>~
> 0
x u' w
OQ.. Q
w
W
~ .C7
O H
~~
~~
Y Y~
~/jJ~[
II.LL.WII..... Wmm IJ
~ ~~
~y>~J W f-
W W
W
C
N
N
J
~ ~ O
,, ~ ~ ~ _~
~~~ ~'~ I ~ Z ~~
.~ ~~ '~ ~' U W ww
.. .,~~ .,,I I ~ W ~ Q~
~,t~~.,~k~.1 I ~ ~ ~ W
r ~ 1 ('. ' ; ~'I ~ W ~
:~~. ,-~~.~; ~,~ ~ ow
,,, p~-Cj
"~ ~i ~ ~Q f=- Z ~Q
o. ~,. ~a, ,.I~'„~~.
'~'~ I
~.
f"~':~
~ ".
~~
,.;
'; ° ~' ~ ', is I.'', .•; ~~ ' ~ W
~~ ' ,1 i','~,','; , ' ,a,
~~~.a a~ ,~~',~,~.~.',. „~~~~~;
,
:
:
, ;
I '
'
i
~ ca,
JJ 1F
~
~ ,
9; Ai
~a, ,n, ~~.'~'p
~'
~ `
~~
, .
. ,
'
1 ,~j ,
~'
.;. c
~,
I :
;:
~;, , ,,
q~
+
in ~~..,f ~~~f: ~' III
I
~
~
,
~ ~ i
.4 ~. ~~
~
...~ar..,
~~"r~~i 4
,
~ ~ ~
~
'` t r
f ~
~~ .
C
, ~~~,
•~~
~ ' ' ~'I I . n i• ~.,f
.4,, i~,
~
~
I
.. ~ . " a ~ ~ ~ 1, '
Q
~Q
W
J Z
~~
W
0
~~
a
o III------iii
~ ~ W
R
O~ LL
~ ~ a
o ~ ~R
W ~~ r&
_~
~ 33 ~~
c
a ~ S`~'
f 00
~~~~
~o
o ¢.v
.d
d
c7
0
i
m
Z
I
N
N
I
r>
W
Q
D
W
Z Q
.~
m~
~
C
~
~
~
m
7
LL j
CO
m
Z0
Q
CU
Z
J
~fi `~`
z Z
J ~
~ ~
I ~ ~ f I (((~ ~ ~ 1~~~I (((
1~
I~Ir^l1~'1
O O
G
~_
0
Margarifa Village: lL][l[. Design guidelines
b. Climate Constraints
Each of the plant material palettes contained in this document are compatible with the climatic
setting of the azea. The utilization of some materials, depending upon their site location, exposure
and relationship to other influential factors may not be appropriate. As an aid to the most
appropriate plant material selection, the following climatological factor summary is presented.
1) Temperature
Generally, the extreme summer temperature is 110 to 115 degrees Fahrenheit and generally
the minimum temperature is 10 to IS degrees Fahrenheit. The average summer daytime
temperature is 90 degrees Fahrenheit with the, average. nighttime temperature being 58-1/2
degrees Fahrenheit. The average winter daytime temperature is 65 degrees Fahrenheit with
an average nighttime temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
2) Wind .
The prevailing summer wind direction is Northwest at an average mean of five (5) knots and
an extreme mean of forty-three (43) knots.
The prevailing winter wind direction is Northwest at an average mean of four (4) knots and
an extreme mean of forty-nine (49) knots.
O
Extreme seasonal wind velocities may exceed fifty (50) knots at peak gust periods.
3) Rain
Average annual rainfall ranges from twelve (12) to eighteen inches (18") per year.
c. Landscape Maintenance Standards
Other than Association or Assessment District maintained areas, all landscaped portions of each
parcel shall be maintained by the Owner. or Sub-Homeowner Association of each pazcel in
accordance with the bes[.industry standards-for professional landscape maintenance. Such
maintenance shall include watering, fertilization, mowing, edging, pruning, trimming, herbicide
programming, pesticide programming, clean-up and other on-going seasonal programmed
maintenance functions. Replacement of dead or diseased plant materials originally approved shall
be accomplished on a routine basis. Automatic irrigation systems shall be routinely inspected,
repaired and maintained in an operating condition at all times. All exterior portions of each parcel
including walks, parking areas and service areas shall be kept routinely free of litter and debris.
d. I~orticultural Soils Test
Soil characteristics within the project may be variable. The owners of pazcels which require
landscape development shallprocureahorticulturalsoilsreportinordertodetermineproperplanting
and maintenance requirements for proposed plant materials. Such a soils test shall be performed by
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-110
Margarita Village ~. ][Design ~vuidelines
a qualified agricultural laboratory and shall include a soil fertility and agricultural suitability analysis
with pre-planting and post-planting recommendations.
e. Irri ag tion
All master homeowner's association areas required to be landscaped shall be watered with an
automatic underground irrigation system. Irrigation systems adjoining a separate maintenance
responsibility areas shall be designed in a manner to insure complete water coverage between the
azeas.
Proper consideration of irrigation system design and installation as they relate to the climate
conditions of the MARGARITA VILLAGE is critical to the success of the landscape investment. In
particular, summer heat must be carefully considered in proper irrigation design and equipment
selection.
Imgation systems shall be designed with head to head one hundred percent (100%) double coverage
at a minimum. In addition, irrigation controllers should have a minimum time setting of one (1)
minute and be capable of providing multiple repeat and start times.
All irrigation heads adjacent to walks, drives and curbs (caz overhangs) shall be of the pop-up type.
Irrigation backflow prevention devices and controllers shall be located with minimum public O
visibility or shall be screened with appropriate plant materials.
J
f. Slope erosion Control ]Landscape and Irrigation
1) General
The Owners of pazcels which require landscape development shall provide access to any
existing common landscape areas adjoining their property. Where feasible, landscape
development shall reinforce or be compatible with such existing common area setting.
All areas required to be landscaped shall be planted with turf, groundcover, shrub or tree
materials selected from one of the three plant palettes contained in these guidelines.
This is a brief summary of the City of Temecula slope erosion control landscape require-
ments. For more detailed information, the builder should refer to the City of Temecula
Standards and check with the City for any current revisions. Landscape and irrigation plans
shall be required by and submitted to the City of Temecula for all planted slopes.
Planting shall commence as soon as slopes aze completed on any portion of the site and shall
provide for rapid short-term coverage of the slope as well as long-term establishment cover
per City standards. The developer shall provide a landscape bond to the City at the time that
the landscape plan is approved. The bond is to guarantee the installation of interim erosion
control planting in the event that the grading operation is performed and building
construction does not commence within ninety (90) days.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-11 I
Margarita Village- ~. design ~auidelines
O Cut slopes equal to or greater than five (5) feet in vertical height and fill slopes equal to or
greater than three (3) feet in vertical height shall be planted with a groundcover to protect
the slope from erosion and instability. Slopes exceeding fifteen (IS) feet in vertical height
shall be planted with shrubs, spaced not to exceed twenty (20) feet on center or a
combination of shrubs and trees at equivalent spacings, in addition to the groundcover.
The plants selected and planting methods shall be suitable for the soil and climatic
conditions. Refer to the plant materials palette. Reference should be made to the City of
Temecula for erosion control methods for slopes and other landscaped aeeas.
2) General Irrigation Requirements
Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with a City approved irrigation system
designed to cover all portions of the slope. If planted slopes aze less than four (4) feet high
and are located in an azea where hand watering is possible, then conveniently located
hosebibbs may be accepted in lieu ofthe required imgation system. However, the hosebibb
must be within fifty (50) feet of the slope so a hose no longer than fifry (50) feet is necessary
to water the slope.
lE. ~IGNAG~
O MARGARITA ViL.LAGE is intended primarily as a residential community. Therefore, only a limited amount
of signage will berequired ordesirable on acommunity-wide basis. However, special signage requirements
will be necessary for the commercial, church, and school sites.
~. ~selIlel'iIfl ~IlIl1teIllt
3 Signage shall be attractive and subdued in keeping with the chazacter of a contemporary urban
environment.
•? Signs shall be limited to community identification, direction and building or company
identification only. Signs should not be used for product advertising.
•: All business and commercial signage shall be compatible with the predominant azchitecture of
the buildings they identify.
•: All signs in MARGARrrA VILLAGE shall be limited to below the roofline and be consistent in
color and theme.
• Road signs in commercial areas should be a maximum of 20 feet in height and be of a size only
necessary for identification.
• Residential signs should be coordinated and integrated with the neighborhoods in which they
Q are erected.
• All signs should be well integrated into site landscaping.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-112
Margarita Village l~~ll. ][Design guidelines
• All signs shall be compatible with the overall theme of the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan n
azea. `-~
• All signs shall be of professional quality.
• No signs shall be painted directly on any building elevation.
• More specific Design Standazds, including dimensional and:locational criteria, should be
formulated as part of the implementation of the Specific.Plan, such as through C.C. & R's.
• Signage design and schematics, showing location, size, dimensions, type style and colors, shall
be submitted with the required plot plan for the retail conunercial site. Recreational Signage shall
be controlled through C.C. & R.'s or other appropriate mechanism.
B. ]~®llnn~n>red ~ngnns
• Revolving, rotating or moving signs shall be prohibited.
:• Signs with flashing or blinking lights shall be prohibited.
• Roof signs shall be prohibited.
:• Signs projecting above rooflines shall be prohibited. Q
J
•'r Totem signs displaying the names of each tenant shall be prohibited.
• Billboazds shall be prohibited.
• Portable signs, including vehicles used as billboards, shall be prohibited.
• Signs advertising or displaying any unlawful act, business or purpose shall be prohibited.
•: Any strings, pennants, banners, streamers, balloons, inflatable objects, flags, twirlers, propellers,
noise-emitting and similaz attention getting devices shall be prohibited, except:
• National, state, local governmental, institutional or corporate flags should be allowed. Flag pole
locations should be shown on the site plan for approval. Only one set of flags should be allowed on
each site.
• Holiday decorations in season, used for an aggregate of 45 days in any one calendar yeaz, should
be allowed.
• Pennants, banners or flags used in conjunction with subdivision sales offices and tract entry
points should be allowed during the initial sale period. /~
3. lLg~~nll ~®>rxa>rxnercnal M®man>mne>m>t ~ng>ms ~--~
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-113
Margarita Village ~. design guidelines
3. lL~e~n- ~®llnn>rnn~>r~n~ll lei[®>laaa>1>rn~>m~ ~ig>ms
• Monument signs are the preferred signage type for the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan Area.
Monument signs should be set backtwenty feet minimum from face of curb (where no sidewalk
is provided) and fifteen feet minimum from inboard edge of walk where a sidewalk or path is
provided. Signs should be set back a minimum of fifteen feeCfrom property line and five feet from
any driveway.
• Monument signs should have a concrete or masonry base, and should be compatible with the
building architecture.
• Double-sided monument signs are allowed.
• Monument sign lighting is permitted, however internal lighting is prohibited in residential areas.
• External lighting is encouraged so long as the lighting source is well concealed and consistent
with the plan area design objectives.
41. ]~unn-afln>mg Ill[®un>m~e~ ~ag>ri<s: l[~e~~nll ~®>mnaun~lrcn~ll ]~annlla~a>mgs
• Multi-tenant retail commercial buildings within areas zoned for commercial land use should
have only one sign for each tenant.
• Tenant signage should be well integrated into the building design.
:• Multi-tenant retail commercial facilities shall have a cohesive, well integrated signage program.
The combined impact and interrelationship of all tenant signage shall be considered in signage
program design, review and approval.
:• All multi-tenant signs should be constructed of the same materials, have similar dimensions and
coordinated colors.
s• Internal illuminated channel letter signs are acceptable, but external, concealed and integrated
lighting is preferred.
• As noted above, externally illuminated signage may be allowed when the lighting source is well
concealed and signage design is consistent with plan area design criteria.
:• The mounting of signs on projecting architectural elements shall be allowed when they are
compatible with the building architecture and compatible with the plan area design objectives.
5. I~][nnll~n-~'e>l~~an>t l~unilla~ln>mg ~nglns
O :• Multi-tenant signage shall be coordinated with the building architecture occurring in a pattern
on the building elevation.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-114
Margarita Village ~.. llDesign guidelines
• Multi-tenant signage should be subdued and more restrained than commercial retail signage. Q
All multi-tenant signs should be constnic'ted of the same materials, have similar dimensions and )
coordinated colors.
• Signs should be similar in design having the same size, shape and color.
~. ~ ~®>mn>rmun>mi~y lEn>try lei[®>rn>tn>mne>m~a~i®>m
• Sighage for community entry monumentation is highly encouraged.
• Design of such monumentation shall be coordinated with street landscape and street furniture.
Monumentation should inform the viewer, through written and symbolic graphics, that the planned
community or development is being entered. Mazquee signs (including signs with changeable
letters) aze allowed as a part of the Project Intersection Identity Monumentation treatment at the
northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Margarita Road. All signage shall be designed to
be integrated with the monumentation hazdscape and landscape elements (see Figure III-55). The
marquee sign may be used to present community service messages as well as clubhouse and golf
course events. During the mazketing phase of the project, the marquee sign may announce project
openings and sales events but pricing and terms-of--sale information may not be displayed. If the
owner of the project desires to discontinue using the mazquee sign, it must be removed and replaced
with project identification information (such as the project name arid logo) and compatible detailing
(such as decorative tiles and ornamentation).. Any such permanent revisions to the signage or
monumentation shall be subject to review and'approval by the Community Development Director.
t
•? Monuments should be compatible with the design theme of the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific
Plan and the developments or communities they identify.
• Entry monuments should establish the community or development design theme. Logo, type
style, and color schemes shall be consistent throughout the azea being identified.
• Entry monuments may be illuminated externally or may be backlit if they are consistent with the
MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan design theme, glare is controlled, and lighting sources
concealed.
:• Permanent, low maintenance materials, such as stone, brick, other masonry or stucco should be
used.
7. ~Di>r~c~i®>m~Il ~igrnage
•3 Directional signage; to identify and direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic to various on-site
destinations shall be allowed.
• Directional signage should be of consistent design throughout a project. signage should be
fabricated from the same materials, with a consistent color palette and a common graphic theme.
• Directional signs shall be small scale and of consistent dimensions and mounting height.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-115
Margarita Village ~ ~. l[Design ~auidelines
~~ • Directional signage should be compatiblewidt the azchitectural design of the project and with
~...-/ the design theme of the plan azea.
~. ~e>rn~~p®>r~lr~ ~nglnage : .
:• Signage identifying uses or activities temporary in nature, such as real estate sales and leasing,
subdivision signage, contractors, design firms and developer signage associated with development
or construction of buildings are allowed if consistent with the plan azea design character.
• Temporary signage shall be located on:or,in close proximity to uses identified.
• Concise standazds for temporary signage, including dimensional requirements, materials of
construction, mounting heights, colors and graphic format should be prepazed as part of the
implementation of the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan, such as through C.C. & R's.
:• The multitude of signs associated with development, design, construction and leasing should be
combined into one design for each project.
Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No. 3 Page III-116