Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout101508 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE OCTOBER 15, 2008 - 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 2008-42 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is athree-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of September 17, 2008 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0170, AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR THE FIRST ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAO(i-0118, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN/HOME .PRODUCT REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT TEN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES, LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF RIESLING COURT (APN 953-090-028) 4 consistent with the Tentative Tract Map and to allow for a reduction in the required private storage space per unit to accommodate washer/dryer units on private patios located at 30600 Milky Way Drive. Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: of Riesling Court, Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters PC RESOLUTION OS- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0166, A MINOR MODIFICATION TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0193, MORNING RIDGE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PRIVATE STORAGE SPACE PER UNIT TO ACCOMMODATE WASHER/DRYER UNITS ON PRIVATE PATIOS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (APN 944-220-003) 5 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0123, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO SUB-AREA B (2.47 ACRES) OF THE APPROVED TEMECULA VILLAGE PDO #5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REPLACE RETAIL IN- LINE SHOP BUILDINGS A AND B WITH A 13,969 SQUARE FOOT FRESH AND EASY MARKET AND TO RELOCATE/REDESIGN PAD C TO 5,800 SQUARE FEET WITHOUT A DRIVE THROUGH, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, JUST EAST OF MORAGA ROAD (APN 944-290- 012) 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0122, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A SPECIALTY GROCERY MARKET WITHIN SUB-AREA B OF THE PDO-5 ZONING DESIGNATION, AS WELL AS A REQUEST FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF-SALE GENERAL) ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, JUST EAST OF MORAGA ROAD (APN 944- 290-012) 5.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: lust west of Cosmic Drive, Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters PC RESOLUTION NO.08- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMENDING THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SECTIONS 17.22.140 THROUGH 17.22.156 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE) TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE SIZE FOR RETAIL AND SPECIALTY GROCERY STORES IN SUB-AREA B FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET, PLUS MINOR MISCELLANEOUS CLEAN-UP REVISIONS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0125)" REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM PLANNING DIRECTOR ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, November 5, 2008, 6:00 P.M. City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The entire agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at cityoftemecula.org. ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, September 17, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, and Telesio Absent: Harter PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments at this time. CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of August 6, 2008 1.2 Approve the Minutes of August 20, 2008 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Carey seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who was absent. Item No. 2 is addressed on pages 3-9. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\MinutesPC\091708 ~ PC RESOLUTION 08-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF .THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING ZONING STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND. SCHOOLS AND AMENDING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE" Junior Planner Lowrey provided a PowerPoint Presentation, highlighting the main components of staff's report as follows: • Background • Current Commercial Zoning • Analysis o Planned Development Overlay 1 o Planned Development Overlay 3 o Planned Development Overlay 7 o Planned Development Overlay 8 o Planned Development Overlay 10 • Recommendation Junior Planner Lowrey provided the Planning Commission with an exhibit that displays the zoning map. At this time, the public hearing was opened. For the record, Chairman Telesio advised that he had a short telephone conversation with Mr. Markham with respect to the staff's recommendation. Mr. Larry Markham, Temecula, representing Julian Charter School, relayed that the applicant would be in agreement with staff's recommendation and would look forward to moving the proposed project forward. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed his concern with placing schools in the Highway Tourist and Light Industrial Zones. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation as proposed, but would request the removal of the condition allowing schools to be placed in the Highway Tourist and the Light Industrial Zone. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who was absent. RECOMMENDATION: R:\MinutesPC\091708 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION OS-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08-0008, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 66,075 SQUARE FOOT, FOUR- STORY BUILDING WITH HEIGHT INCREASE UP TO 66' 3" WITH PROPOSED USES TO INCLUDE FIRST FLOOR RETAIL AND OFFICES ON THE SECOND THROUGH FOURTH FLOORS AND PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08- 0083, AN ASSOCIATED SIGN PROGRAM WHICH INCLUDES A VERTICAL MARQUEE, DIRECTIONAL BLADE SIGNS, WALUFRIEZE BUILDING SIGNS, AND WINDOW SIGNS FOR THE TRUAX BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MERCEDES AND SECOND STREETS (APNS 922- 043-012 AND 922-043-017) Associate Planner Peters, by way of PowerPoint Presentation, highlighted the following main components of staff's report: • Project Description • Location • Site Plan • Elevations • Special Considerations • Sign Program • Sign Details • Recommendations Director of Public Works Hughes relayed the following comments regarding Public Works Conditions of Approval: • That granting the applicant's request as proposed, would severely weaken the department's ability to manage the design of the street improvements • That the Public Works department is responsible for what is built in the City's right-of- way • That as engineering representatives of the City of Temecula, it would be staff's responsibility to point out challenges and make recommendations of approval • That regardless to the challenge of the Public Work's conditions, it would be the responsibility of staff to ensure that all City streets are safe • That the City has wholeheartedly tried to uphold the goals of the Old Town Specific Plan and create a pedestrian friendly atmosphere • That the Public Work's department is required to ensure that sound engineering judgment is being applied to all City projects as well as Old Town projects • That the primary issue of concern would be with the intersection of Mercedes and 2'~ Street • The applicant has presented several options to the City with respect to modifying the engineering improvements that are currently under construction at this intersection • That the radius that is identified in the inside corner is what the City would need, at a minimum, to adequately accommodate larger vehicles such as school buses, fire apparatus, delivery and transport trucks; noting that this would be the minimum that R:Vvlinutes PC\097 708 would be able to handle the larger trucks; that the 35' radius is placed throughout the City; and that virtually every improved corner has a similar radius and has been working adequately for the City's purpose • That no where in the Specific Plan does it indicate that "bulbs" at intersections are a requirement • That the Mercedes Street project currently under construction was reviewed two years ago by the Planning Commission, Public Traffic Safety Commission, Old Town Local Review Board, and by the City Council; and that the street improvement plans were also available at previously held town hall meetings • That the drawing provided by the applicant's engineer demonstrates protrusion into the intersection and would vary significantly from the previous drawing; and that a protrusion has demonstrated on the applicant's drawing would make it very, very difficult for many vehicles to maneuver the corner and impossible for others • That staff examined the templates for truck-turning that is used and recognized by the State of California (via overheads) • That all intersections that currently have a "choker bulb" situation -that when a driver of a large vehicle is approaching an intersection -and they realize that they will not be able to maneuver the turn, they would have a choice to continue straight, make alert-turn, or find another route for their designation -that they would not be forced to make a turn • That with respect to Mercedes and 2nd Street, a southbound large truck would be forced to drive over the side walk or drive into the opposing traffic • That it would be his opinion that only trucks would have difficulty maneuvering the corner but cars as well may have difficulties • That with weight restrictions on Mercedes Street, the City cannot prevent local commerce that has a service to a business in Old Town from using Mercedes Street even with the weight restriction; that the vehicle code specifies that any truck has the right to use local streets regardless of the weight restriction • That given the circumstances of the area of concern, pedestrians have an expectation that if they are standing on a sidewalk that they are in a safe zone; advising that this would not be the case for the proposed "choker bulb" • That if the proposed "choker bulb" proved to be safe the Public Work's department would not have an issue • With respect to the alley vacation, the Public Work's department would not have a concern with this request • With respect to additional "choker bulbs" at the alley of Mercedes and 2nd Street, staff has not reviewed the design and would have concerns with the proposal creating issues, primarily uncontrolled midblock crossings may be encouraged which the City has made an effort to avoid in the past • That the Conditions of Approval do not prevent the applicant from making further suggestions on the street improvements in the manner in which they were written • That over the past five years there has not been an accident on Old Town Front Street • The following Conditions of Approval should not be modified and/or deleted: 7, 13, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, and 29 In closing, Director of Public Work's Hughes stated that he would recommend that the Planning Commission maintain all the Public Work's Conditions of Approval; stated that the applicant can build a successful project abiding by the City's Conditions of Approval meeting the level that is applied to all projects in the City. R:VvtinutesPC1097 708 Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that because the City is hopeful of creating a pedestrian friendly environment on Mercedes Street, queried if it would be prudent to have trucks be limited by weight and hours of driving except for local deliveries. In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's queries, Director of Public Works Hughes relayed the following: • Stated that at this time, staff cannot predetermine whether or not Mercedes Street would be established as a truck route; that the City may need to consider this at a future date; and that this would be a public hearing process • That currently there would be a truck restriction on Old Town Front Street and that Mercedes Street would be the back-up route • That the 35' radius in Old Town was established and is recognized by most Cities, County's, and the State because it would be the minimum that would work • That it is not anticipated to extend Mercedes Street beyond 2nd Street, advising that the street beyond 2nd would be privately owned. For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Hughes stated that it would be his opinion that the anticipated traffic volume on Mercedes Street would be 2,000 trips per day. At this time, the public hearing was opened. By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Mr. Walt Allen, representing Mr. Truax, provided a hypothetical history as to the inception of the Truax building and introduced Mr. Bernard Truax. Mr. Christopher Campbell, representing Mr. Walf Allen, by way of PowerPoint Presentation, highlighted the main components of his PowerPoint: • Concepts and Styles of Turn of the Century Buildings o -Mass o -Material o -Repetition o -Detail • Penthouse Addition o -Later Style o -Setbacks o -Low Profile o -Dynamic Downtown Development • Design Articulation o -Street Level Variation & Detail o -Awnings o - signage & Lighting • View from 2nd & Mercedes • Site Design o Street Improvements o Alley Abandonment & Improvement o Encroachment into the R.O.W. Mr. Walt Allen requested the following modifications and/or deletions or the following conditions of Approval (as per handout): R:\MinutesPC\091708 - PW 7 Delete - PW 13 Delete reference to "upstream" - PW 23 Amend Condition to be consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and Old Town Demonstration Project (Front & Main Streets) - PW 24 Delete Condition - PW 25 Delete additional 12' requirement - PW 26 Applicant requests vacation of the alley-Delete Condition - PW 27 Delete as a result of the deletion of PW 26 - PW 28 Modify the condition to indicate loading/unloading zone as indicated on the site plan and conditions PL 18 & CS 5 - PW 29 Modify the condition to require Public Works to grant an encroachment permit for items encroaching as long as they meet the requirements of the California Building Code for encroachment - PW 31 Linked to PW 7, this condition may remain unchanged if the applicant is Permitted to construct the 35' radius curb with bulb Understanding the concerns of the Public Work's department, Mr. Gary Thornhill, Temecula, relayed that it would be his opinion that Caltrans standards should not be applied to the Old Town area; relayed his support of the proposed project; and requested that the Planning Commission consider the proposed project; and noted that it would be his opinion that the project, as proposed, will maintain the integrity and character of the streetscape. By way of staff report, Mr. Truax explained his requests and modifications to the Planning Department and stated the following: • That he would be willing to make the proposed "choker bulb" smaller • That he is willing to pay for the storm drain to ensure that no ponding is created • That he is willing to dedicate the land for the street improvements • That with respect to the awnings and other encroachments, if they comply to the development Code that they be granted • That the units are 50% leased, but have stopped the leasing program unit the proposed project is approved • That the applicant would be prepared to build remaining phases of project At this time, the Planning Commission took a 10-minute break. The following 12 individuals spoke in favor of the proposed project for the following reasons: • Mr. Marc Pascoe, Temecula • Mr. Bill Dalton, Temecula • Mr. Roger Epperson, Temecula • Mr. Brad Bassi, Temecula • Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula • Mr. Steve Bascurto, Temecula • Mr. Chuck Hargis, Temecula • Mr. Craig Pena, Temecula • Mr. Steve Wheeler, Temecula • Mr. Chris Baily, Temecula • Mr. Ron Walton, Temecula R:UAinutesPC\091708 • That the proposed "choker bulbs" would help with pedestrian safety and would be aesthetically pleasing • That more traffic signs may help to mitigate traffic concerns for pedestrians • That the proposed project will be an asset to the Old Town vision • That large trucks should not be allowed to enter into Old Town unless making local deliveries • That the tenants of the proposed project are looking forward to the project moving forward • That the Old Town merchants support the proposed project in its entirety • That there would be a concern with the lack of parking • That the merchants of Old Town would not be concerned with truck deliveries At this time, the public hearing was closed. Relaying that he would be in favor of the buildings proposed aesthetics and the overall project, Commission Chiniaeff expressed some concern with the following: • Concerned with the 4'" story element - • That the applicant would need to abide by Conditions of Approval and meet ADA requirements, the building should be moved back • Would be in favor of removing large trucks from Old Town with exception of local deliveries Although in favor of the proposed project Commissioner Guerriero did express some concern with the following: • '4'" story element • Lack of parking • That the applicant should meet all ADA requirements • Would be in agreement of the Public Work's department with respect to "choker bulb" • That the police officers can enforce mid-block street crossing With respect to the awnings, Public Works Director Hughes reiterated that as long as the applicant meets UBC requirements and awnings do not create site distance problems, the awnings will be approved. Commissioner Carey relayed his enthusiasm with the proposed project, but also expressed concern with the 4~' story element, lack of parking, and would be hopeful that the applicant and the Public Work's department can work through the issues of concern. Chairman Telesio stated the following concerns: • .Expressed concern with the 4"'story element • Expressed concern with the Public Works department's Conditions of Approval as stated in staff's report With respect to the penthouse 4t" floor element, Mr. Allen noted that this was created so that the 4'" floor would not appear so tall from a pedestrian perspective. R:UAinutesPC\091708 7 Referencing the 4th story element, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that although he would not be in favor of the penthouse, he noted that it may be more aesthetically pleasing if the same materials were used throughout the building. Understanding the concerns of the Planning Commission with respect to the 4'" floor element, Mr. Truax stated that he would be willing to change and reshape the cornices to match the cornices on the 3r° floor, creating continuity. With respect to the following Conditions of Approval, Assistant City Attorney Curly stated the following: PW 26 & 27 That the Planning Commission does not have the authority to order a vacation of an alley; that the applicant can request a vacation of the alley which would require a public hearing process -- keep as a standard Condition of Approval. PW 7 Work with the Public Work's Department -- PW 13 Keep as standard Condition of Approval -- PW 23 Keep as standard Condition of Approval -- PW 24 Keep as standard Condition of Approval -- PW 25 Work with the Public Work's Department -- PW 28 Work with the Public Work's Department -- PW 29 Keep as Standard Condition of Approval -- PW 31 Keep as standard Condition of Approval-Work with the Public Work's Department With respect to bulbs, Deputy Director of Public Works York stated that the applicant's engineer has the ability to do a redesign of the corner property line to stay in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. Director of Public Work's Hughes reiterated the public works department's concern with safety issues as it would relate to the "choker bulbs" on Old Town Front Street. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the project; approve the sign program as submitted; approve the findings for increasing the height of the building; that the parapet on the 4'" floor be consistent with the materials of the rest of the building; a condition be added for a parcel merger; that the Planning Commission recommend that PW 7 stand as is, and that any required ADA be constructed on site; that staff initiate the process to install a stop sign on 2"tl Street and Mercedes Street; that PW 23 stand as is; that PW 25 stand as is; PW 26 and 27 stand as is; PW 28 stand as is; PW 29, recommend that the applicant pursue this; PW 31 keep as standard. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Harter who was absent. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS No reports at this time. R:\MinutesPC\097708 PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT With respect to the Tree Ordinance, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that the Ordinance is complete and will be coming forth to Planning Commission on November 5, 2008. With respect to the fatality of a bike rider on the Ynez Road, Director of Public Works Hughes advised that he has not received an official report. Director of Planning Ubnoske explained the change of policy with respect to minor modifications. ADJOURNMENT At 9:47 pm, Chairman Telesio formally adjourned to October 1. 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Telesio Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPC\091708 g ITEM 2 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: October 15, 2008 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report Planning Director's Agenda items for September 2008 ~~ ~ ... , September 4, 2008 PA07-0312 A Tentative Parcel Map for Hossein .~. APPROVED condominium purposes to Zomorrodi, K & S subdivide one existing commercial Engineering building into ten separate commercial condominiums, located on the north side of Temecula Parkwa at Rancho Pueblo Road September 11, 2008 PA08-0150 A Minor Conditional Use Permit to Matthew Fagan APPROVED operate a dog daycare facilitywithin Consulting an existing 5,473 square foot Services industrial building, located at 27629 Commerce Center Drive Attachment: Action Agendas ACTION AGENDAS ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING September 4, 20081:30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: PUBLIC COMMENTS Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No. 1 Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: 1:30 p.m. PA07-0312 Tentative Parcel Map Rancho Pueblo TPM Hossien Zamorrodi, K&S Engineering A Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes to subdivide one existing commercial building into ten separate commercial condominiums North side of Temecula Parkway at Rancho Pueblo Road Exempt per CEQA Section 15315, Class 15 Minor Land Divisions Betsy Lowrey APPROVED The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available forviewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Ccunter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Lihrary located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Directors Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the Citv's website at www.cirioftemecula_ora P:\Plnnning\Directors-Hearing\2008\09-04-2008 Action Agenda.docl ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING September 11, 20081:30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1 1:30 p.m. Project Number: PA08-0150 Project Type: Minor Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Dogtopia Applicant: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to operate a dog daycare facility within an existing 5,473 square foot industrial building Location: 27629 Commerce Center Drive Environmental Action: Exempt per CEQA Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Dana Schuma ACTION: APPROVED The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available forviewing at City Hall's Planning Department PublicCounter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Director s Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.cityoftemecula.org. P:\Planning\Directors-Hearing\2008\09-I Id008 Action Agenda.docl ITEM 3 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 15, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitrerow/Matt Peters, Case Planners APPLICANT NAME: Randy Allison PROJECT Planning Application No. PA08-0170, the first one-year Extension of SUMMARY: Time request for Planning Application No. PA06-0118, a Development Plan/Home Product Review to construct ten single- family residences located on Rancho California Road east of Riesling Court CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32 In-fill Development RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 2, 2006, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA06-0118, a Development Plan to construct ten single-family homes and Planning Application No. PA05- 0176, Tentative Tract Map No. 33630, to subdivide 3.71 acres into ten single-family lots and three open space lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet consistent with the Low Medium Residential zoning district. The approval period for the Development Plan was two years; while the approval period for the Tentative Map was three years. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the development. On August 1, 2008, Randy Allison, filed Planning Application No. 08-0170, a request for a three year extension of time for previously approved Home Product Review to be consistent with the approval period for the associated Tentative Map. Per Section 17.05.010H of the Temecula Development Code, the Planning Commission may grant a time extension of one year with up to three extensions. Staff has determined that the extensions shall be requested and granted on an annual basis (one year at a time), not all at once. Therefore, staff recommends approval of a one-year Extension of Time. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 4, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. TION Staff has determined that the proposed Extension of Time, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Development Code, and aH applicable Ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Extension of Time based upon the findings and with the attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Extension of Time (Code Section 17.05.OtOF) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed single-family homes are in conformance with the Low Medium land use designation of the General Plan. The project density of 2.7 dwelling units per acre is also within the 3-6 dwelling units per acre for this land use designation. The project design and architecture is consistent with the City's Development Code and Design Guidelines. The site, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Fire and Building Codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the single-family project, including the site layout, architecture, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those living and working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing AERIAL MAP 300 600 1,200 1,800 Feet /' This map was matle M Me Cib of Temecula Gengraphc Inlormarnn System. The map is tledvetl Rom bdse data producetl q the Riverside Caunry Assessdls Oepadment arM the Trensmrtauon and Land Management Agency of RivarsMe Canty. The City of Tema¢~la assumes no wamanry or legal respmsibibty for Ne M/onnavon mntamed on mis map. Oata and reformation represented on this map are subgot 1tl update and motifimtion. The Geographic IMamation System antl Mar sovmz should be queried for ma most current iNormaum. this map is not kr repdM onesale. City of Temecula PAOg-olio PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0170, AN EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR THE FIRST ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0118, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN/HOME PRODUCT REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT TEN SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATED ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EAST OF RIESLING COURT (APN 953-090-028) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 2, 2006 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0118, Development Plan for Home Product Review. B. On August 1, 2008, Randy Allison, filed Planning Application No. PA08- 0170 Extension of Time Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 15, 2008, of a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0170 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that per Section 17.05.010E of the Development Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed single-family homes are in conformance with the Low Medium land use designation of the General Plan. The project density of 2.7 dwelling units per acre is also within the 3-6 dwelling units per acre for this land use designation. The project design and architecture is consistent with the City's Development Code and Design Guide/fines. The site, as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the single-family project, including the site layout, architecture, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those living and working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Extension of Time Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Section 15332, Class 32 In-fill Development); Project is consistent with Low Medium (LM) General Plan and Zoning designatioris. 2. Project is within City limits and less than five acres (project site is 3.71 acres). 3. No habitat or sensitive species are located on site. 4. Approval of the project would not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. 5. All utilities are available. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0170, an Extension of Time request for the first one-year extension to Planning Application No. PA06-0118, a Development Plan/Home Product Review to construct ten single-family residences located on Rancho California Road east of Riesling Court, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of October 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of October 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA08-0170 Project Description: An Extension of Time request for cone-year extension to Planning Application No. PA06-0118, a Development Plan/Home Product Review to construct ten single-family residences located on Rancho California Road east of Riesling Court Assessor's Parcel No.: 953-090-028 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Tentative Tract No.: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Residential 8 DU or Less Residential -Detached Residential -Single Family Tract 33630 October 15, 2008 August 2, 2009 (based on original approvals) Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions ofApproval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements PL-3. This project is subject to the Conditions ofApproval for Planning Application No. PA06- 0118, unless modified herein. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: Planning Application No. PA08-0170 Applicant: Randy Allison Location: North side of Rancho California Road, east of Riesling Court Proposal: Planning Application Number PA08-0170, the first one-year Extension of Time request for PA06-0118, a Development Plan/Home Product Review to construct 10 single family residences Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 31, In-fill Development) Case Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: October 15, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or priorto, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. ITEM 4 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 15, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitrerow/Matt Peters, Case Planners APPLICANT NAME: Sandra Parmley, representing Battaglia Inc. PROJECT Planning Application No. PA08-0166, a Minor Modification (Planning SUMMARY: Review Only) to Planning Application No. PA06-0193, Morning Ridge Condo Conversion, to change the expiration date to be consistent with the Tentative Tract Map and to allow for a reduction in the required private storage space per unit to accommodate washer/dryer units on private patios, located on the southwest corner of Margarita Road and Rancho California Road CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 29, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA06-0193,. a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to convert 200 apartment units into condominiums and PA06-0192, an associated one-lot Tentative Tract Map No. 34907. On August 1, 2008, Sandra Parmley, on behalf of Battaglia Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA08-0166, a request to change the expiration date of the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to be consistent with the Tentative Tract Map, and to allow for a reduction in the required private storage space per unit to accommodate washer/dryer units on private patios. The applicant is not proposing any other changes to the development. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The approved project involves the 200-unit Morning Ridge Condominium complex constructed in 1989. The project consists of 25 two-story buildings, two cabana/laundry buildings totaling 460 square feet each, an additional 236 square foot laundry building, and a 1,685 square foot fitness/leasing building. The unit mix consists of 48 one-bedroom, one-bath units; and 152 two- bedroom, two-bath units ranging in size from 628 square feet to 900 square feet. Existing amenities on the site include three pools, three spas, and a tennis court. Proposed amenities include a fitness par course, barbeque facilities at the pools and par course, children's play structure, and a volleyball court. Washer/Dryer Location All units will include washer and dryer units to be provided by the applicant. When approved, the project proposed relocating these washer and dryer units from the storage closet on the patios for each unit to an interior space. However, structural issues have been identified that will not allow for the units to be relocated. These structural issues relate directly to the requirement to provide exterior venting ducts for the dryer units. As previously approved, the washer/dryer units would be located in an interior hallway closet (location varies by unit type/floor plan). The structural issues include the venting duct length exceeding the maximum allowable to reach an exterior wall, the duct locations conflicting with existing structural beams, existing floorjoist frames and existing framing, and the laundry units require a separate laundry circuit (see attached plan reductions). The applicant is requesting a modification to the approved plans which would allow the washer and dryer units to remain in the storage area. The Subdivision Ordinance requires each unit provide 150 cubic feet of storage. This requirement was previously met on the porches/balconies of each unit with the relocation of the washer/dryer units from the balcony to the interior of the unit, as well as the replacement of the water heaters with tankless units. With the current request, this requirement of 150 cubic feet per unit cannot be met. The private storage per unit provided would range from 110 to 112 cubic feet, depending on floor plan. Staff does not believe this is an issue of concern since the proposal involves an as-built condition and the requirement for additional private storage space is not a health and safety issue. As constructed, and with the proposed amenities, the project meets the intent of the Development Code and provides for a positive quality of life. The applicant is still proposing to provide tankless water heaters. Expiration Date In addition, the applicant is requesting a change to the project's expiration date. The Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan were approved in conjunction with the Tentative Tract Map. The approval period for the Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan was two years; while the approval period for the Tentative Map was three years. The applicant would like all applications to be subject to the same approval period for ease with project management. Staff reviewed the request and discussed it with the City Attorney. It has been determined that the code does not include any provisions for such a request and, therefore, staff cannot support this request. The applicant would be allowed to file for an Extension of Time prior to the expiration date. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 4, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities). FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for High Density (H) Residential development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The existing residential apartment complex will be converted to ownership condominium units. This modification involves a reduction in private storage space per unit to accommodate private washer and dryer units. The project conforms with the Subdivision Ordinance, Subdivision Map Act and Zoning Code, with the exception of the provision of the required private open space and private storage space. However, the project involves an as-built condition meeting the intent of the code and neither requirement represents a health and safety issue. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposal for converting 200 existing residential units to condominium units is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the High Density Residential (H) land use designation within in the City of Temecula's Genera/ Plan, as well as the development standards for the High Density Residential (H) zone of the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is, therefore, properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the proposed for-sale residential condominium use. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed condominium use against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be consistent with the surrounding uses. The project is converting existing apartments into for sa/e residential condominiums. Adjacent uses include single-family residences which is compatible. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the proposed project to determine consistency with the Development Code and has found that the project meets all of the applicable requirements with the exception of private open space and private storage space. Each unit includes private usable open space (porches or balconies) which range in size from 67 square feet to 72 square feet. All of the 200 units do not meet the Development Code requirement for 150 square feet of private open space per unit. In order fo compensate for this, staff has required the provision of additional on-site amenities, as described above. Each unit includes private storage space which ranges in size from 110 to 112 cubic feet, less than the required 150 cubic feet per unit. With the additional amenities, staff does not believe this is an issue of concern since the proposal involves an as- built condition and the requirement for additional private open space and private storage space are not a health and safety issue. As constructed and with the proposed amenities, the project meets the intent of the Development Code with regard to open space and providing for a positive quality of life. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the condominium use and found that it will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be adequately served by the Fire Department in an emergency situation. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Statement of Justification Notice of Public Hearing AERIAL MAP 0 240 480 960 1,440 Feet This map was made by the City of Temecula Geogaphic Infoimatipn System. The map a derivetl (ram base data praducetl by tfre Riversitle County Assessols Depadment aM Ne Transpodatim and LarW Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temeci4a aswmes no warranty a legal respansidlity for Ilte irAomution contairetl an Nis map. Daly and inbmution represerded on this map are subject to update arM modification. The Geographic INOrmdUm System arM other soumes shaAtl be 9uede0 for Ne most anent infonnafion. This map is rolfp repent a resale. R\GISIXeII\arrniapyroj\planring map selsba06-0192.mad City of Temecula PLAN REDUCTIONS 2G-r 0 ALT WASHER/ - ORVER LOCATION Y PROBLEMS: -VENTING WILL MR EXISTIN( -RUN IS OVER 1/'-0• ~2UN VENTING OTHER DIRECTION WILL HR EXIS' FLOOR JOIST FRAMING W a N 3•s a-r e•~• B•s B•-0• N I O _._. l Pµ~ . e o _ LL LL Q / 0 4 in w ~ . 9-0• CLEAR $ n J F ~, ICITCHEPI ]8-REFS SPACE ~ _ - ~ Y DINING RM P iq o <Y H. WALLWI I . - -- WODDW ~ 3 ENTR ALL 8 EXISTING BEAM $ 21088 b Y LNING ROOM ~ > BEAM EXISTING w EXISTNG "~ o FRAMING FRAMING ' G -! BEDROOM t sq. fi0fi85L GLASS DR 0 gg ~ ~~ sY~ I PATIO M ~/ Y tsq CLOSET e . TORAG O 4 ro i` .n °P n SHELF 6 POIE (TVP.) Ir F O.S. 7-r AIR SPACE TYPICAL T-10' 4'<• -EXISTING WASHER/DRVER LOGTION 12 CU81C FT AREA (37DXZ/V0 WASHERIDRYER DRAWING NUMBER MORNING RIDGE APARTMENT HOMES 1 OF 4 TITLE FIRST FLOOR: TOTAL LIVING AREA 6281 sq. ft. SCALE DATE BY ( HANDICAP ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNIT) 1 /8°-/~A-0^ 7-1 4-OS EA Ir / A S S O I• T 6 S, INC. 1 2 A5.0 A6A C PAHmr 0 e C KR EN a 96' REFS SPACE O B DINING RM F CLOSET MC. 2W. Ysd.. I IZ 4Y H. WALL W/ _-- 1 _ wood cAP ~ ENTRY ALT WASHER/ ALL EXISTIN DRYER LOCATION 2fifi8 BEAM LNING ROOM PROBLEMS: tom' ' -VEMING WILL HIT EXISTING BEAM ISTING EXI TING RUN IS OVER 14'-0' RAMING F ING RUN VENTING OTHER DIRECTION BEDROOM WILL HR EXISTING FLOOR JOIST FRAMI Y ~ M EXISTING WASHER/DRYER LOCATION ~ l 42 CUBIC FT AREA (31 OX27W) RAG WASHER/DRYER CLOSET s SHELF 6P0 (IYP.) DRAWING NUMBER MORNING RIDGE A PARTMENT HOMES 2 OF 4 TITLE SECOND FLOOR: TOTAL LIVING AREA 6283 sq. ft. SCALE DATE BY A S S O [ A 7 6 S, INC. 3366 VIA LIDO NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA USA 92663 TEL 949 723- 8900 TAX 949 723-8910 d-2' AIR SPACE 0'-Z' AIR SPACE TYPICALFOR,y11DDLE UNITS 2T-0' TYPLCAL 42 CUBIC FT AREA (B1DX27VJ) WASHER/DRYER PROBLEM: -INTERIOR VENTING RUN IS OVER 14'-0' e ALT WASHEIL DRYER LOCATIOP PROBLEMS: -VENTING RUN IS OVER 14'-0' -WOULD HAVE TO RUN DRAIN 8 WASTE PARALLEL TO FRAMING -RUN VENTING OTHER DIRECTII WILL HR FRAMING -MUST PROVIDE SEPARATE LAUNDRY CIRCUR FOS Re' 1 I 1 ~: Ilcns Y e GE PATIO 'o ~. ~ i " < (~\ SIDE UNIT ONLY BEDROOMi LIVING ROOM t sq.. s aQ' IY EXISTING EXISTING FRAMING FRAMING m N N I 31060 M.C __ I ~- O DRES ~ BAT 1 DINING ROOM ..e~ ~ L- .s . S6Q. 0 • F y~ a N , ~ - Q ~a~ BAT 2 3 _ . / ' ' ELF a FOIE .. m 3 $ 5 -0 CLEAR C I ~ I a9S ~ KITCHEN OO a W CLOSET m ENTR ~ aQ" - MALL ~ Y o/w ~ ~ F.O.S SIDE UNIT ONLY 5'E- S'-0' VERIFY 3'-10' ~ - BEDROOM2 :sQ Y F.O.S. F.O.S. 14~-8~ L 4'~ L B'~~ L zr-0~ -PROBLEM: -0IRECTION OF EXISTING FL JOIST VENT HAS TO CUT THRU FRAMING FOR INSIDE UNITS -PROBLEM: -VENTING TO EXTERIOR EXCEEDS 14'4T MORNING RIDGE APARTMENT HOMES DRAWING NUMBER 3 OF 4 TITLE FIRST FLOOR: TOTAL LIVING AREA 9001 sq. ft. SCALE DATE BY ( HANDICAP ADAPTABLE DWELLING UNIT) ~ ~g"~-0" 7-t 4-08 EA S 0/C I A/TAE S , INC. 4 7 i EXISTING WASMER/ORVFI2 LOCATION ~'~ ~~ 42 CUBIC Fi AREA (37DX27YV) WASHER/DRYER 5060 STO ^ ,q`5~ ( f yy'v I SIDE ]0685L. GlAee DR. UNIT I ONLY °e BEDROOM 7-GLDPING CEOJNG f ~ LNING ROOM SLOPING GEIIAIG PROBLEM: " 2 -0IRECTION OF E%1S71NG FL JOIST EXISTING E%ISTING VENT HAS TO CUT THRU FRAMING FRAMING FRAMING FOR INSIDE UNITS PROBLEM: -INTERIOR VENTING RUN IS OVER 11'-0' I M4 ~' I ~ DINI ROOM DRESS G ' sa. I PROBLEM: lae 8 -VENTING TO EXTERIOR EXCEEDS 74'-0' ALT WASHER/DRVER LOCATION © a9 PROBLEMS: CLOSET D~ - -VENTING RUN IS OVER 74'-0' - -WOULD HAVE TO RUN DRAIN 8 SHELF n PIXE 9TH p ~~ WASTE PARALLEL TO FRAMING SHELF a POLE s4' ~ C -RUN VENTING OTHER DIRECTION . KITCHEN OY WILL MIT FRAMING CLOSET ENTR -MUST PROVIDE SEPARATE 3068 sN' ' LAUNORV CIRCUR HALL D/w lobe 2fifie SIDE ~~ UNIT °"`Y ~ I I BEDROOM2 SSLOPING CEILING I 1 f sa. . S SOaO / / DRAWING NUMBER MORNING RIDGE APARTMENT HOMES 4 OF 4 TITLE SECOND FLOOR: TOTAL LIVING AREA 900E sq. R. SCALE DATE BY 1/8"- '-0" 7-14-08 EA e s s o t o T e s, t>ac. 3366 VIA LIDO NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA USA 92663 TEL 949 723-8900 FAX 949 723-6910 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0166, A MINOR MODIFICATION TO PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0193, MORNING RIDGE CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PRIVATE STORAGE SPACE PER UNIT TO ACCOMMODATE WASHER/DRYER UNITS ON PRIVATE PATIOS, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (APN 944-220-003) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 29, 2007 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA06-0193, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to convert 200 apartment units into condominiums and PA06-0192 associated one-lot Tentative Tract Map No. 34907. B. On August 1, 2008, Sandra Parmley, on behalf of Battaglia Inc., filed Planning Application No. PA08-0166, Minor Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 15, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0166 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for High Density (H) Residential development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The existing residential apartment complex will be converted to ownership condominium units. This modification involves a reduction in private storage space per unit to accommodate private washer and dryer units. The project conforms with the Subdivision Ordinance, Subdivision Map Act and Zoning Code, with the exception of the provision of the required private open space and private storage space. However, the project involves an as-built condition meeting the intent of the code and neither requirement represents a health and safety issue. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Code Section 17.040.010E) A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposal for converting 200 existing residential units to condominium units is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for the High Density Residential (H) land use designation within in the City of Temecula's General Plan, as well as the development standards for the High Density Residential (H) zone of the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is, therefore, properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the proposed for-sale residential condominium use. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed condominium use against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be consistent with the surrounding uses. The project is converting existing apartments into for sale residential condominiums. Adjacent uses include single family residences which is compatible. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Staff has reviewed the proposed project to determine consistency with the Development Code and has found that the project meets all of the applicable requirements with the exception of private open space and private storage space. Each unit includes private usable open space (porches or balconies) which range in size from 67 square feet to 72 square feet. All of the 200 units do not meet the Development Code requirement for 150 square feet of private open space per unit. In order to compensate for this, staff has required the provision of additional on-site amenities, as described above. Each unit includes private storage space which ranges in size from 110 to 112 cubic feet, less than the required 150 cubic feet per unit. With the additional amenities, staff does not believe this is an issue of concern since the proposal involves an as-built condition and the requirement for additional private open space and private storage space are not a health and safety issue. As constructed and with the proposed amenities, the project meets the intent of the Development Code with regard to open space and providing for a positive quality of life. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; Staff has reviewed the condominium use and found that it will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Fire Prevention has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be adequately served by the Fire Department in an emergency situation. This modification does not involve any changes to the approved condominium (residential use). Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Minor Modification Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities); 1. The Project involves a minor change to an approved conversion of 200 existing residential apartment units into for-sale condominium units. No expansion of use is proposed. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0166, a Minor Modification to PA06-0193, Morning Ridge Condominium Conversion, to reduce the private storage space per unit to accommodate washer and dryer units on private patios, located at the southwest corner of Rancho California and Margarita Roads, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15`h day of October 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15"' day of October 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA08-0166 Project Description: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to Planning Application No. PA06-0193, Morning Ridge Condo Conversion, to allow for a reduction in the required private storage space per unit to accommodate washer/dryer units on private patios Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-220-003 Approval Date: October 15, 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developershsll deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements PL-3. This project is subject to the conditions of approval for Planning Applications Nos. PA06-0192 and PA06-0193, unless modified herein. STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION 1VIORNING RIDGE LLC Via Federal Express July 30, 2008 Ms. Cheryl ICitzerow City of Temecula, Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589-9033 RE: Planning Application No. PA06-0193 (DP/CUP) -Minor Modification Application Proposed Conversion of 200 Existing Residential Apartment Units to Condominiums Dear Cheryl: As a result of our meeting with the City of Temecula's staff on June 30, 2008, we are requesting approval for the following changes to the conditions of approval: 1. Expiration date of the Planning Application No. PA06-0193 to be changed to match the expiration date of the Planning Application No. PA06-0192 (TTM) which is August 29, 2010. 2. To allow the Washer/Dryer in the units to remain in the private storage space for each unit which means a reduction of private storage space by approximately 42 cubic feet per unit due to the following conditions: a. The required venting, as well as waste and drainage lines, will be a problem if we move these units indoors due to the location of the existing framing. In some cases, there is no way to bring venting through to the exterior without cutting into joist and beams. b. If we were to run venting vertical from the first floor to the roof this would exceed the City's required 14 ft. maximum run. It is estimated to be at least 18 ft. As stated, venting cannot exceed 14 ft. with two 90 degree elbows as per U.B.C. c. In addition, if we were to run the venting horizontally to the exterior we would also exceed the 14 ft. maximum even if we penetrated through the existing framing. 3366 Va Lido• Newport Beach, California 92663 Tel (949) 723-8900 • Fax (949) 723-8910. Ms. Cheryl Kitzerow July 30, 2008 Page 2 of 2 d. Currently, there is a washer and dryer in the private storage area per unit which sits side by side. We will replace these units with new, energy efficient stackable washer/dryer units. e. Currently, there is a regular water heater in the private storage area and we are replacing them with a new, energy efficient tankless water heater per unit. f. We have enclosed 3 sets and a CD of the four (4) drawings which reflect the issues that prevent us from moving the washer/dryer to the interior of the unit. We have also attached the Application for a Minor Modification -Planning Department Review (DP) along with a check in the amount of $157 for the application fee, a Radius package with address mailings from Fidelity Title, and address labels of the residents at Morning Ridge. Please let me know if anything further is needed. Best {' "'c `~ Sandra Parmley `y V Executive Vice President sp/rondo-morningridge-703 Enclosures: Three (3) sets of Drawings One CD Check Radius Package Morning Ridge Resident Labels NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing Time of Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application No. PA08-0166 Sandra Parmley, Battaglia Inc. Southwest corner of Margarita and Rancho California Roads A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to Planning Application No. PA06-0193, Morning Ridge Condo Conversion, to change the expiration date to be consistent with the project's Tentative Tract Map and to allow for a reduction in the required private storage space per unit to accommodate washer/dryer units on private patios In accordance with the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 October 15, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. Project Site ti, mo ITEM 5 STAFF REPORT -PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 15, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Case Planners PROJECT Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122, PA08-0123, and PA08-0125, SUMMARY: a Conditional Use Permit, Major Modification, and PDO Amendment to PDO-5 for Temecula Village to allow the construction of a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market with alcohol sales and a 5,800 square foot Pad C retail shop, located along the south side of Rancho California Road, just west of Cosmic Drive RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions (For PA08-0122 and PA08-0123) Recommend Approval (For PA08-0125) CEQA: Notice of Determination Section 15162, Consistent with previous Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Ron May, The Bergman Group for Fresh & Easy General Plan Professional Office Designation: Zoning Designation: PDO, Temecula Village PDO-5 Existing Conditions/Land Use: Site: Vacant, disturbed/graded North: Multi-family residential across Rancho California Road South: Vacant -Multi-family residential portion of Temecula Village PDO and single-family residential beyond project boundary East: Vacant -commercial/office portion of Temecula Village PDO and Single-family residential beyond project boundary West: Multi-family residential (Temecula Ridge Apartments) Lot Area: Temecula Village PDO: 23 acres Project Area -Sub-Area B: 2.47 acres Total Floor Area: Proposed Structures for Sub-Area B: 19,769 square feet total (Pad C: 5,800 SF /Fresh & Easy: 13,969 square feet) Landscape Area/Coverage: 27% (30,056 square feet) Parking Required/Provi ded: 89 spaces required 93 spaces provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY On October 8, 2002, the City Council approved the Temecula Village PDO-5, Development Plan, and Tentative Parcel Map with associated Mitigated Negative Declaration. The PDO created three sub-areas for the 23-acre development; Sub-area A includes the northeast portion of the property approved for retail/office uses (including Rite-Aid); Sub-area B includes the northwest portion of the property approved for retail uses (the focus of this application); and Sub-area C includes the southern portion of the property approved fora 160-unit apartment complex. Modifications to the project have been approved over time including revisions to site access, building design/location and square footage, and replacing the gas station with adrive- thru retail Pad (Pad C in Sub-area B). Oh May 30, 2008, The Bergman Group, submitted Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122, PA08- 0123, and PA08-0125 a Conditional Use Permit, Major Modification, and PDO Amendment to allow the construction of a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market with alcohol sales and a 5,800 square foot Pad C retail shop. A DRC meeting was held with the applicant to discuss site planning concerns raised by staff. Several redesigns were submitted addressing staff concerns with building locations, access, and architecture. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Maior Modification Planning Application No. PA08-0123 is a request for a Major Modification to Sub-area B (2.47 acres) of the approved Temecula Village, PDO#5 Development Plan. The proposed modification involves replacing retail in-line shop Buildings A and B (previously 17,100 square feet) with a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market, and to relocate/redesign Pad C (previously 2,448 square feet with drive-thru) to 5,800 square feet without adrive-thru. The proposed modification represents an overall increase in retail area of 221 square feet. Pad C is proposed to be attached to the proposed Fresh & Easy building. Site Plan The previously approved Site Plan included three separate retail buildings in Sub-area B. Building A was located at the northwest corner of the site; Building B was located at the southern (rear) boundary of this sub-area adjacent to the manufactured slope; Pad C was a drive-thru located at the northeast corner of the sub-area. Parking was approved central to the site along Rancho California Road and to the rear of the site flanking Building B. The proposed major modification proposes Pad C (in-line retail shops) and the Fresh & Easy Market to be located at the southern (rear) boundary of the sub-area. The buildings have a spatial and architectural relationship to each other and the building placement in adjacent Sub-area A to the east. In addition, both front building elevations are oriented to Rancho California Road to foster a better relationship to the street. As required by the PDO, a common outdoor eating area is proposed where Pad C and the Fresh & Easy buildings join. Loading for the market is proposed along the western elevation. As required by the PDO and Citywide Design Guidelines, the loading docks have been located to result in the feast impacts to the adjacent residential uses. In addition, the docks have been screened from the west with an architecturally designed screen wall and landscaping, and from the street with decorative gates. Access/Circulation The on-site circulation will be slightly modified as a part of the Major Modification. The redesign proposes a change in the building layout. As a result, the site parking lot will be reconfigured. The parking spaces approved to the east of Building B will be eliminated. The parking spaces on the west side of the site will remain and additional parking will be provided at the north of the site along Rancho Califomia Road. Access to the site is not impacted by the modification. Access to the site is provided in two locations along Rancho California Road. Primary access to the site is located (at a future signalized driveway) approximately 1,180 lineal feet east of Cosmic Drive. Secondary access to the site is provided from a private street shared with the adjacent Temecula Ridge Apartments. A total of 94 parking spaces were originally approved for this sub-area of the commercial center. The modification reduces the total site parking to 93 spaces, with 89 spaces required. The parking provided is in conformance with the parking requirement. The Fire Department has reviewed the proposed access and parking lot design and has determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. Architecture The originally approved commercial buildings for Temecula Village featured an architectural style which incorporates Mediterranean features, including, clay the roofs, arches, stucco, stone veneer, and flat cornice parapets. The commercial buildings also incorporate tower elements with wrought iron detailing, canvas awnings and wood trellises as accent treatment. The stucco exteriors consist of warm earth tone colors (beige, rust, tan, browns). The proposed building elevations incorporate some of the originally approved architectural features as well as some of the unique architectural features associated with Fresh & Easy markets. Consistent with the other approved buildings within the commercial development, the Fresh & Easy building incorporates clay the roofs, integrated tower element with wrought iron detail, stucco, stone veneer, and decorative the details. The building exterior will be painted the same colors as the other buildings approved on the site; however, an additional green (sage) accent color will be added to the palette to help provide various breaks in the wall planes. The entryway of the building has been emphasized with an asymmetrical roof pitch, metal canopies, and large expanse of windows. The architectural design of the Fresh & Easy building is consistent with the Design Guidelines and architectural standards required by the Temecula Village PDO. Landscaping A total of 27 percent of the site will be landscaped. A portion of the originally approved landscape plan has been modified to accommodate the new design. The proposed landscape plantings have been coordinated with the originally approved plantings. The modified landscaping plan will be complimentary to the new building design as well as the overall commercial center. A mix of trees, shrubs and ground cover will be installed to frame and soften the proposed building, delivery truck loading dock, and associated parking. Landscaping will be installed in planter areas adjacent to the building, in new parking areas, and around the outdoor plaza area. A plaza area has been provided along the front of Pad C, adjacent to the east elevation of Fresh & Easy so patrons- may enjoy outdoor seating within the commercial center. The outdoor area will be enhanced with decorative paving and landscaping. Additionally, the project still includes, in compliance with the PDO, a pedestrian connection located on the west and east areas of the site, which provide access to the Sub-area C. The landscape changes resulting from the proposed modification are consistent and meet the intent of the Temecula Village PDO landscape standards and the Development Code standards. Conditional Use Permit Planning Application No. PA08-0122 is a request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a specialty grocery market within Sub-area B of the PDO-5 zoning designation, as well as a request for a Type 20 (off-sale general) Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license. The Temecula Village PDO allows for retail and specialty grocery stores in Sub-Area B, up to 10,000 square feet, with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed PDO Amendment would increase the allowable size to 15,000 square feet (see PDO comment below). The proposed Fresh & Easy use is considered to be a retail market that specializes in a specific class of food and related products. The PDO also allows for the sale of alcoholic beverages with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, subject to the Section 17.08.050G of the Development Code. The proposed sale of beer and wine requires aType-20 license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The applicant provided a "Statement of Operations" (attached) for staffs review in determining the appropriateness of the proposed market use. The market use to be approved with this request will operate between the hours of 7 a.m. and midnight, seven days a week. The proposed project will provide a small neighborhood market in a safe and convenient location for surrounding residents. The proposed use is located in Census Tract 0432.20. Staff has discussed the conditional use with ABC and has determined that the Census Tract is not over-concentrated. Currently, no licenses exist within the subject census tract, and there is one pending for the Rite-Aid in Sub- area A of the project. Therefore, the area is not over-concentrated and Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity are not required. Staff identified no major concerns in reviewing the proposed conditional use. The proposed use is not located within 500 feet of any schools, churches, or public parks. The use does not jeopardize or adversely affect the character of the area as it will allow the market to be competitive with other similar businesses selling beer and wine. Therefore, the proposed use, a specialty market with incidental sale of beer and wine, is consistent with the General Plan, as well as with the zoning designation of the Planned Development Overlay and the Development Code. PDO Amendment Planning Application No. PA08-0125 is a request for a Zoning Code Amendment to modify the text of PDO-5 for Temecula Village to increase the allowable size for retail and specialty grocery stores from 10,000 to 15,000 square feet, with a Conditional Use Permit. In addition, the proposed amendment includes other minor revisions, such as adding references to previous approvals and Planning Application Numbers, modifying the landscape buffer dimension along Rancho California road consistent with the approved plans (width was previously reduced from 25 to 20 feet to accommodate a bus turnout), modifying the number of required pedestrian connections from Sub-area B to Sub-area C (residential) consistent with a previously approved Minor Modification, and clarifying requirements for locations/screening of loading areas. Staff has reviewed the proposed revisions and is supportive of the changes. The increase of allowable square footage for retail and specialty grocery stores is consistent with the intent of the PDO to allow for a neighborhood serving market for the adjacent residential uses. The other miscellaneous revisions are consistent with existing conditions and previous approvals. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 4, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review. The proposed Major Modification will result in minor Site Plan adjustments, but will not intensify the development and therefore will not result in effects that were not discussed in the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration for Temecula Village. FINDINGS Major Modification -Development Plan (Development Code Section 17.05.010F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Temecula Village PDO land use designation, and with the development standards and zoning requirements for a project to be constructed within a Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. The project meets all applicable design standards required by the Temecula Village PDO and Citywide Design Guidelines. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable Fire and Building Codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Section 17.04.010E) The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed use is conditionally permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning designation contained in the City's Development Code and consistent with the General Plan and Temecula Village PDO. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the use type proposed. The use, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Fire and Building Codes. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures, and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because it will provide additional convenience for the community, and allow the business to be competitive with other similar markets selling beer and wine in the vicinity of the site. The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the General Plan and will be a complimentary addition to the area in that it will provide a safe and convenient neighborhood market for surrounding residents. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the Temecula Village PDO and with the Development Code and the project meets all of the applicable requirements for commercial development. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without adversely affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features required by the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses on the site and in the neighborhood. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The requirements for the proposed conditional use are intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the use will function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. PDO (Zoning Code Amendment) The proposed PDO Amendment is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; and the proposed Ordinance is consistent with the Municipal Code and Development Code for the City of Temecula. The Zoning Code (Planned Development Overlay-5) amendment has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the policies and standards of the City's General Plan, which protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed 13,969 square foot specialty and retail grocery market is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Major Modification Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution CUP Exhibit A -Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution PDO Amendment Exhibit A -Draft City Council Ordinance Statement of Operations Notice of Public Hearing AERIAL MAP 0 170 220 440 660 Feet Tn¢ map was rtatle by Ne City of Temeala Geographic NfomiaUm System. O The map is tlerivetl from base tlata pro0uced by Me RiservEe County Assessor's DeparMent an0 Uie Transportation arM Lantl Ma~gement Agency of Riversitle Coinry. The City of Temecula assumes no wartanty or legal responsibdily fo. Ue infonnatim utntainetl on Nis map. Data an0 iNOrma6pn representetl on this map are subject to pptlafe antl motlificatlon. iTa Geogmphic Intwrnatipn System arM oNer spumes shoulE be guenetl for tl~e most areent information. This map is nd for reprint a resale. • PA08-0122 City o Temecula PA08-0123 PLAN REDUCTIONS ~~ 5 ~ ~ i i~ i a {1 '~ ~ ~ A s' ~'-'==1 i u g n F f F q x F S`~ 3~ 5~ p of S~ y :S ~'E sg o~ S~ Sa ~EE g ~b A ~~ ~S Bg~~~~~$~~' 2 d € F~ ~ gg 22 P ~s ¢g& ~~$5 ' ~ ' $ nG 8€ p- F B ff ~ ( ¢§¢§ s & ` 3T E~ t 2 E~~ g$~gg~gg~ 9b ~ ~ '~ ; ;p_ s~~~~p~ s S 4~5 f.~~~SgR E $gR t , ~O ~ fi ~ £~ - 55L y y ~ ~~ P ~$ ~ # Y ~ . ~ a a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § I1 ~F .~$ ~ ~ ~~ $ ~6o8 b ~8~~~~ s 53:;~ ~ ~5~~~gD =c -~ ~e t' a f $ gg ( ~i~ ~~1 ~$~8 ~ [~9$*~ e p ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ 8gg Fagg 4 g~$D f ~ ~ €~ ~~ ~~ a 3h L P R 8 €€€g f s ~ CC~a z' ' i ~~~ a ~ e~ dm ~ o $~ € ~q~ s .._.~- _-_- _.. ? Rg k 5i @ q~ FSE E~ p]^ [x x^ s~ vo sp s• eg LC ~n~Y6 35E iC L 9~ 9~ ~g ~.~ ~~ ~~ ~~g~@ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~g ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ I€ p~~E ~6 s ~ ~a € s2 5 s~ [ ~~ g 2~ a~ E s € 2 ~q'~ Ec ~C6~ B~ d~ s~ ~~~ ~~ ~E -=t S5'i a• _ _ _ @'~ zCs . " 2 2yV f Ep}p} e}~ -• s s~ s' BspR s. .~+. ~a s~cs ~~ i ~:~.. g®p ES ~t C 8'.5 9g~g :~ CE Y3 @~ ~6 Y ~gp{E 9: "} Gn` ~~ ~ --~4F aF I~ ~ iv' SG i9 F~ 7gp¢ ¢ ~~ ia{€ 5~ o ~ s~ ~ 8-s~ fy(~ ~ °e €~ ~~,~9 }~g~ ii #~~ ~~ jg~ i~8 ed ~ € $ f~~ya i@ ~. ~ a+ € a ~~ S~ S¢ y ~~~ Fie i s9~8 ~ ~ c 3 ~ E s i~ v C c ~s ,S R R i< D_ C 2 ~, 1 N_ 0 m m D 1 O z z 0 a _x T A O Z m r m D 1 O Z TEMECULA R ~(~~ ~~ ,~~ -~ i ~ ~ ~ ® ® ®; t'J s - ~ ~ ~ ~~~ -- -------~-3---I-~+--- L~~J --- ..:. 3 ~ ~--n ee 8 ~ i , A I °~~~~ ~~ I: a5~ a~ ~a~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~, '~~ ~~ ~ a agg E6 ~ ~ ~~` I~ I z~g~ ,ry 6A ~e V -__ r i ~ i I ii ~- ~ 3..e r~ ~~ij a 4#s ~ ~' 0 E i~l iro;(w) ai i- ~~ ---- ----f-- --y` ~ . ~,< ~ .. ~ _ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' i ~ .'s ;D1 it ~I 1 ~ 1 m;~ v m a •.~ I ~ ; m l 3 ' i .~~ N~~ r _'_` ~n §- m ~ ~. ~ ~ ,- I r ~-- _ _ _ _ __."'^_' '~^ ~ _ w ie ICJ ) ~ ~\~ _l I \~a "• ~ ~ i, _ _ i LIo N•,~ __ is ~o <' _ -o ~ rte: ;. ift~= 9 ~a~ i~, FRESH ~ { D\I m -e-n) 0 m'' g., a fu; ;~ ;~ ~~ I l ~) i N i~ N i \ W I ~ me I F'-y s ~ ~ C I 6 ~ n 0 c ~m 7 a s - -1 F o g r~ G 10'-0' EL _ Q __________i - 'i' ,. _` , j __' _. ~ _ -i ___ ___ __J . _. _v_;__1~__~r,;~ ~ i R~ h~ q~ §~ `i mE F :P ~ s 5 ~~ 2~ c8 ~° °~ £ A R ~~ a x t o '~ 8 ja F f i~ i iu ~ _ E e; u~: ^ ~ ° 3 ` °~ ~ F o ~S ' 2 R '' ~' ~ 1 i :s r~ ,o -- su ,~~ t s ~' ~ i ~: f=? _i~, „I"~ „ _ ,. "_ ~~ m - ,'; . ~:.~~ . s=F ~ ogi a^p~ - ~ ssa [5~ "~z rt'~ F p I .i yF.~ y AS LPL :^ '~„ [', a~ ~F E S~~ _:P F ~~ b: o~ $a i Eo ,~ s=_ // _ I F% F afs3 ~S o .~ ~~ ~~ c 0 O b A tl b Z a I -~ ~ ~\\L `~ / l C - ., _ C - .. .. e o C _ a v - C tl vz L ~ { e ~ ~pC I . _ - .. @ Y ~4~~ _ m C ~ ~_ _ pr Tb it Jim __ z_ ao `; - . Z t~C o rr ui~ r I~~ ~~; __-~- ~il~ ~`~IlCV~~Qll~~~ 1~dd 4.U •? ~grliiit€6eRi~ 4g~€~, ?a~~F i~~~~ .iR r e a t ' a`! a .~ i(Spep.. 9 ti .-'E1 p5¢ 1' ~z'd7' ~;si1 ~~jdl ;I 3, Ci CSI i r i 's r W-~a_~ [ gals ~r~! {~i' I§: 6; I i i I I I% . E PROPOSED C° 4~~i3 g~E i£ ~ ag§g ;sxs S~ F$ ggg~ sA is ~ ~ E r, R $~_ _-i*g{~ e~~¢e` 3~d 8 iY i4 i~ :~ `4 Io 59 F ¢~~ ~`? E~ LBEa(E x ~ + ~ ~~ f~ ~ }~ Sg SF `y ~ £~ 9i G _ ~. LfR ` ` a !i ~_ I :1.1111 111 Ci~~z }'~?_ ~ ~~ : 4:~a` ~S F `"~ S - t ~ :z ~ ~@s" x ~ "` is ~a €~ c _y€~ Y iA F ~q `F 5 ~ S6 F: yF {~ {gi ~~ ~ S e§ s s~ ~ - iq 7d ; p iC za ~F 3 z a : ~ :k` z8 a 4 i 93iF f a ~( ? >~ z ; S 6- Z : s z , 9 ~ i €~ € ~ F 7 i ~ ~~s B ~. a4 ~ ~99 $i ~ '. ~ z z Y (( E - ~ se,G `- g , a ' ' ' ' ~ _ , 0 c 1 2 A A m r m D 1 O z ,'s e 7i'S F I '•.. N _~ N_ lJ m m r m D 1 O Z z 0 A 1 _2 T Z m r D 1 R VI k !_ ~~y E~~ .i' b 6 III~I li i. 1.1 ~ J1.._ i I~,)ya~ E {ILL 3X.~ C• §, e ~9~ ~~! !=s ip - ~ ys .dam c ~~;,, ~$ iii ~, E `aX `~ - s s ivi ~ ti ~~ ~~~~ $~ ~ ~~.€ ~~ p g ~ f C _~? ~ ~? gg6S e c d °~€~ ~E :c Ic A ~ ~~ ~ ; ~~ )POSED FRESH & EASY ~0 t / O TD Z V ? o '0 --I ~~D wmr 0 0 `~~v ~~z o ~ Z e ICI ~ ~ II ~ I IIi~ ~ II b,~ ~ I ~; ~ ~~'i~~l S _ E ~ QG ii Ti°~'~ I ~ ..4i X __ of i l ~~ u' E~ ~ ~ • s ~ -~-~ ~ X44 €" ,o ~r• Mo " ® ~' s ~. € , t f 6~ „ l~ ~Q ~4 4e 3 # f 3~ ~ I d- 8 3 ~~ t ~ ' ~z ~ ~~ ~ : - t ~ ' € - +. z _a a a aa8 a s a s i ~~ ~1 4~ 1 €3 ~ ~~ s ~ - a ~ pp Q ~ . , g g ~~ 3 € 4 ~ ~ 1 t ~ $ . ~ ¢¢~~ s 9~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~1 a ~9 ~ ~~ si ttki 0 ~ ~ @~ i ~ ~ # d~ ~ ~ i ~ 9 d td iata 449 s€~ sa rl I:a I; aS ®OOOO nnnaa~ ~ ~ ~ ® f ~~¢ [4R C C A M <<< Py9y YaY P 9 f Y ~319~ el d ~ b• 61 b fgg i; t'E~ ii~~E ~~$~~~3 arc Y [„ 5~~~~° "ci ~F~~~o ~.€~4gq ~~ <~"~aa W a U d J z J > a Q a J r U z W ~ J a 1- a,a a }[ ~~~ ~ ~~l~ 4 a 4 4 q] ~ Y4 1 A P 0 g a S ~~ 1 xcg ~ sxcsaaa ~ 3 ~ ~u_3 ~Y ~~ ~ 3F~7'i4~ A 1 as ~aF ~ 4 aP4 3 :?a'~ aaF ~~.~~ by ~~~~ 41` 1 ~ e: a~ 96 2~ gCa 4 °FI ~ = i 4`la€, aet P~E€ E€! i~-Z ~~~ ;I~q ~ ~~1~11~ ~g~ aa~a~s~~~€ a~ PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0123, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO SUB-AREA B (2.47 ACRES) OF THE APPROVED TEMECULA VILLAGE, PDO#5 DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REPLACE RETAIL IN-LINE SHOP BUILDINGS A AND B WITH A 13,969 SQUARE FOOT FRESH 8< EASY MARKET, AND TO RELOCATE/REDESIGN PAD C TO 5,800 SQUARE FEET WITHOUT A DRIVE THROUGH, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, JUST EAST OF MORAGA ROAD (APN 944-290-012) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 8, 2002, the City Council approved Planning Application No. PA00-0140, the Temecula Village Development Plan. B. On May 30, 2008, The Bergman Group, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0123, Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The applicant also filed Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122, Conditional Use Permit, and PA08-0125, Planned Development Overlay 5 Amendment. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 15, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0123 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Major Modification Application, Development Code Section 17.05.010E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; z The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and the Temecula Village PDO land use designation, and with the development standards and zoning requirements for project to be constructed within a Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. The project meets all applicable design standards required by the Temecula Village PDO and Citywide Design Guidelines. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable Fire and Building Codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification Application, PA08-0123, a Major Modification to Sub-area B (2.47 acres) of the approved Temecula Village, PDO#5 Development Plan to replace retail in-line shop Buildings A and B with a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market, and to relocate/redesign Pad C to 5,800 square feet without drive through.: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification Application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA00-0140 on October 8, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Major Modification Application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Major Modification Application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15163 of the CEQA 3 Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification Application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0123, a Major Modification to Sub-area B (2.47 acres) of the approved Temecula Village, PDO#5 Development Plan to replace retail in-line shop Buildings A and B with a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market, and to relocate/redesign Pad C to 5,800 square feet without drive through, located along the south side of Rancho California Road, just east of Moraga Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. a Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15'h day of October 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [S EALj STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. O8- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15~h day of October 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary 5 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECUl1t DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application Nos.: PA08-0123 Project Description: Planning Application No. PA08-0123, a Major Modification to Sub- area B (2.47 acres) of the approved Temecula Village, PDO#5 Development Plan which involves replacing retail in-line shop Buildings A and B (previously 17,100 square feet) with a 13,969 square foot Fresh and Easy Market, and to relocate/redesign Pad C (previously 2,448 square feet with drive through) to 5,800 square feet without drive through representing an overall increase in retail area of 221 square feet Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007 MSHCP Category: Commercial per VTM No. 31023 DIF Category: Retail Commercial per VTM No. 31023 TUMF Category: Retail Commercial per VTM No. 31023 Approval Date: October 15, 2008 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developershatl deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($1,940.75) which includes the One Thousand Eight Hundred Severity Six Dollar and Seventy-Five Cent ($1,876.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48- hourperiod the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval forthe project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign theAcceptance of Conditions ofApproval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements PL3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-5. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Temecula Village PDO-5. PL-8. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Temecula Village Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 8, 2002 (PA00-0140). PL-7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL-8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-g. Landscaping installed forthe project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-10. The applicant shall paint athree-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL-11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL-12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL Clay Roof Tile Stone Veneer Field Color Accent Color Accent Color Field Color Trim Color Cornice Color Accent Color Canvas Awning Canvas Awning Metal canopies, ornamental iron, metal trellis Glazed ceramic the detail Fresh and Easy only -Metal gate with perforated and solid sheet metal panels Pad Conly -pre-cast column Pad Conly -rough sawn trellis COLOR 40% Brick Red, 40% Red, 20% Sahara Sequoia Rustic Ledge Sherwin Williams Ivoire Sherwin Williams White Hyacinth Sherwin Williams Cajun Red Sherwin Williams New Colonial Yellow Sherwin Williams Tea Chest Sherwin Williams Hopsack Sherwin Williams Sheraton Sage Tierra Cotta #4622 Blanded green tailored bar strip #4944 Powder coated Cobalt, Teal, Almond, Vermillion, Deep Purple Herb Garden Sherwin Williams Country Cream Sherwin Williams Basil PL-13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL-14. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots. PL-15. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved the Director of Planning. PL-16. This approval is contingent upon approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122 and PA08-0125. PL-17. Upon approval of PA08-0125, all site plan exhibits in the Temecula Village PDO shall be amended to reflect the changes included with this modification. PL-18. This project shall be subject to the Conditions ofApproval for Planning Application Nos. PA00-0140, Temecula Village Development Plan, PA00-0138, Temecula Village GPA, PA00-0139, Temecula Village PDO, PA00-0152 TTM, PA02-0652, VTPM No. 31023, PA06-0019, Rite Aid and Pad C modification, and PA06-0292 Minor Modification for site access, unless modified herein. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-19. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. PL-20. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is anarchaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." PL-21. A copy of the Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-22. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL-23. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL-24. Three copies of revised Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department: These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-25. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL-26. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Two landscape site inspections are required: One inspection is required for irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." PL-27. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-28. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan), and the locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the Tentative Map. PL-29. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractorwho shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-30. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicanU owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-31. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide athree-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in orderto reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like anafter-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL-32. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL-33. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL-34. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PL-35. A Lot Line Adjustment shall be recorded to address the retaining wall along the rear of the proposed buildings. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-36. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted priorto scheduling for the final inspection. PL-37. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and publicright-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping the covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. PL-38. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-39. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request liy the applicant. PL-40. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL-41. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol ofAccessibility inblue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL-42. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-43. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL-44. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated June 20, 2008, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. All design components shall complywith applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-5. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B-6. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-7. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-8. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-9. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-10. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21, specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. B-11. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B-12. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B-13. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. Prior to Submitting for Plan Review B-14. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. At Plan Review Submittal B-15. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-16. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2007 edition of the California Building Code. B-17. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B-18. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-19. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-20. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-21. Apre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector priorto the start ofthe building construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information CS-1. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction and demolition debris. CS-2. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. CS-3. All landscaping including parkways, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) CS-4. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure fora 4-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and off site 6° x 4" x 2-2'/::° outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F-4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. (CFC Chapter 5, Section 508.5). F-5. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.7. and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-g. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.1.2). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-10. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention _ Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met forthe on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and Chapter 5, Section 501.3). F-11. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E. F-14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6- inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-15. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). F-16. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.3). F-17. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD-1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding the building are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows. PD-2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding the building rooftop be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have asix-foot clearance from the building. PD-3. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD-4. All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance, California Government Code 8565. PD-5. All exterior lighting to be in compliance with Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 665 requiring low pressure sodium lighting. PD-6. All exterior doors to have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above each door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD-7. All exterior night lighting shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD-8. Applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non- businesshours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1000 in accordance with Section 8565 of the California Government Code. PD-9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD-10. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the building must be removed or painted overwithin 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP, option #5. PD-11. Upon completion of construction, the building shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm companyto notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. This condition is not applicable ifthe business is opened 24/7. PD-12. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange'. PD-13. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the building shall beplaced in awell-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the building. PD-14. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD-15. All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at California Retailers Association, 1127 Eleventh Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 443-1975. Penal Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. PD-16. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. PD-17. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. PD-18. Contact the Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for employees, management and owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. PD-19. Applicant will comply with the Temecula City Ordinance 97-07, (9.14.010 Temecula Municipal Code series) regarding the use of alcohol. PD-20. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: a. Valid California driver's license b. Valid California identification card c. Valid military identification card (active/reserve/retired/dependent) d. Valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. PD-21. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following requirements: a. Name of person b. Date of birth c. Physical description d. Photograph e. Currently valid (not expired). PD-22. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department. PD-23. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less that $40 for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business advising customers of the "Inkless Ink Program" in use. If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the Police Department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. PD-24. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD-25. Refer any and all questions to the Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit (951) 695-2773. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. PW-3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed Cityright-of-way. PW-4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted- on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW-5. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-ti. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW-7. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW-8. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations fortheconstruction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW-g. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. PW-10. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW-11. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW-12. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW-13. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-14. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW-15. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW-16. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. PW-17. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-18. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum overA.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207. c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 400. e. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 113. f. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. g. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. h. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. PW-19. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Rancho California Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/V1n to include installation of sidewalk, street light, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited tc water and sewer),14' raised landscape median, deceleration lane. The Developer shall reimburse the City the cost forthe construction of halfwidth of the raised landscape median (yet to be built along Rancho California Road) at a rate not to exceed $150.00 per lineal foot. The Developer is to reimburse the City for their fair share of the cost of the existing median built by adjoining properties along Rancho California Road. The Developer is responsible for the frontage along their property. b. Install a 200' long deceleration lane on Rancho California Road at the proposed main entrance, as approved by the Department of Public Works. Dedicate an additional 10' right-of-way for the deceleration lane. c. Provide an easement at the main entrance for the maintenance of traffic signal equipment, loops, and interconnect. d. Design and install a traffic signal and interconnect at the intersection of Rancho California Road and the main entrance. PW-20. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. PW-21. The Developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter, median, sidewalk, drive approaches; streetlights, signing, striping, traffic signal systems, other traffic control devices as appropriate; sewer and domestic water systems; and storm drain facilities. All power poles and utility lines existing or proposed shall be installed underground. PW-22. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or otherdisruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PW-23. A lot line adjustment will be required between the residential and business parcels before the retaining wall permit can be issued. PW-24. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW-25. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. PW-26. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW-27. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-28. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW-29. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the Developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW-30. Corner property line cut off shall be required per City of Temecula Standard No. 603A. PW-31. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-32. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-33. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. v ~~ .lone 20, Zoos ~~ ~ 3 ~ L i~1~ilW Cheryl Kitzerow, Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Eaara "r Direewra e el,!iam E.Pwmmer SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY Ralph H. Daily FRESH AND EASY-TEMECULA VILLAGE s` vire Preside"` PARCELS NO. 5, NO. 6, AND NO. 7 OF PARCEL MAP Stephen J. Corona NO. 31023; A.PN,944-370-005, APN 944-370-006_, AND APN Ben R Drake 944-370-007 Lisa D. Herman John E. Hoagland please be advised that the above-referenced project/property is located within Lawrence M. Libeu the service boundaries of Rancho Califomia Water District (RCWD). The subject project/property fronts an existing 24-inch diameter water pipeline °trcers: (1305 Pressure Zone) within Rancho Califomia Road. Pniuip L. enrbea Interim General Matuger Jeffrey D. Armstrong Water service to the subject project/property does not currently exist. Acting Assistant Central Manager/ Chi f Fi d l OR Additions or modifications to water/sewer service arrangements aze subject to e nan e cer Per R Louck the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service as ry Director of Planning , well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the Mdrew L. webaeer, P.E. A D property owner Where private (on-site) facilities aze required for water cting istrict Engineer K 1G E G service, fire protection, irrigation, or other, RCWD requires recordation of a e . arcia District secretary Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on-site private C. Michael Cowett facilities, where private on-site water facilities may cross (or may be shazed East Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel amongst) multiple lots/project units, and/or where such "common" facilities may be owned and maintained by a Property Owners Association (proposed now or in the future). Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on- site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, property owner(s) may be required to sign an acknowledgement of low water service pressure when service arrangements aze made or modified. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project-specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment ofproject-specific fees and requirements. OS\CW:at04TFEG Rancho California Wa[er District 42135 Winchester Road Post ORce Box 901] Temecula. California 92589-9019 (951129fi-fi900 FAX f9511 29fi-fiRfiO Cheryl Kitzerow/City of Temecula June 20,2008 Page Two Sewer service to the subject project/property is not currently available. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT ~(.L_/ Corey ..Wallace, P.E. Engineering Manager cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor OS1CW:a[04TFEG aancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Ruad Pos[ OfLce Box 9019 Temecula, California 925R9-90tt (95112966900 FAX (9511206-6860 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0122, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A SPECIALTY GROCERY MARKET WITHIN SUB-AREA B OF THE PDO-5 ZONING DESIGNATION, AS WELL AS A REQUEST FOR A TYPE 20 (OFF-SALE GENERAL) ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) LICENSE, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, JUST EAST OF MORAGA ROAD (APN 944-290-012) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 8, 2002, the City Council approved Planning. Application No. PA00-0140, the Temecula Village Development Plan. B. On May 30, 2008, The Bergman Group, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0122, Conditional Use Permit application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. The applicant also filed Planning Application Nos. PA08-0123, Major Modification, and PA08-0125, Planned Development Overlay 5 Amendment. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 15, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0122 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit Application, Development Code Section 17.04.010E A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code; The proposed use is conditionally permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning designation contained in the City's Development Code and consistent with the General Plan and Temecula Village PDO. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the use type proposed. The use, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Fire and Building Codes. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures, and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures because it will provide additional convenience for the community, and allow the business to be competitive with other similar markets selling beer and wine in the vicinity of the site. The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the General Plan and will be a complimentary addition to the area in that it will provide a safe and convenient neighborhood market for surrounding residents. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this development code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The proposed conditional use is consistent with the Temecula Village PDO and with the Development Code and the project meets all of the applicable requirements for commercial development. The site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use without adversely affecting the yard, parking and loading, landscaping, and other development features required by the Development Code in order to integrate the use with other uses on the site and in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The requirements for the proposed conditional use are intended to protect the health and safety of those in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the use will function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. 3 Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit application, PA08-0122, a Conditional Use Permit to construct a specialty grocery market within Sub-area B of the PDO-5 zoning designation, as well as a request for a Type 20 (Off-sale general) Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Conditional Use Permit application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA00-0140 on October 8, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Conditional Use Permit application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Conditional Use Permit application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Conditional Use Permit application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Conditional Use Permit application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0122, a Conditional Use Permit to construct a specialty grocery market within Sub-area B of the PDO-5 zoning designation, as well as a request for a Type 20 (Off-sale general) Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license, located along the south side of Rancho California Road, just east of Moraga Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. a Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15~' day of October 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula on the 15~h day of October 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Planning Commission, do hereby was duly and regularly adopted at a regular meeting thereof held Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA08-0122 Project Description: A Conditional Use Permit to construct a specialty grocery market within Sub-area B of the PDO-5 zoning designation, as well as a request for a Type 20 (Off-sale general) Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license, located along the south side of Rancho California Road just east of Moraga Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007 MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Satisfied per PA08-0123, Major Modification Application Satisfied per PA08-0123, Major Modification Application Satisfied per PA08-0123, Major Modification Application October 15, 2008 October 15, 2010 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($1,940.75) which includes the One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Six Dollar and Seventy-Five Cent ($1,876.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48- hourperiod the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements PL-3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-ti. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-7. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Temecula Village PDO-5. PL-8. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Temecula Village Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on October 8, 2002 (PA00-0140). PL-g. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-10. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated May 29, 2008, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions ofApproval. PL-11. This Conditional Use Permit maybe revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL-12. The City its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL-13. Prior to an employee selling alcohol from this facility, the alcohol licensee or employer for the facility shall ensure that the employee has received Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (L.E.A.D.) training from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. PL-14. An 8.5" x 11" (or larger) sign listing local transportation service providers and corresponding telephone numbers shall be posted at a conspicuous location within the building. Information to assist in the compilation of this sign may be obtained through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (951-676-5090). PL-15. This approval is contingent upon approval of Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122 and PA08-0125. PL-16. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL-17. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated June 6, 2008, a copy of which is attached. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Refer to conditions from PA08-0123 for fire and life safety conditions. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD-1. The following are conditions of approval and public convenience and necessity for this conditional use permit request submitted by applicant Andrew Hedin, Fresh & Easy Market located in the Temecula Village off Rancho California Road. The following conditions must be met. PD-2. Applicant is a new business, applying for a Type 20 (Off Sale Beer & Wine) -through the Riverside District Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are allowed on the premises. PD-3. Applicant will comply with City Ordinance 97-07, 0.14.010 Temecula Municipal Code series, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD-4. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: a. Valid California driver's license b. Valid California identification card c. Valid military identification card (active/reserve/retired/dependent) d. Valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States e. Valid U.S. Passport f. Valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, and County or City agency. PD-5. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with Section 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B&P), which includes the following requirements: a. name of person b. date of birth c. physical description d. photograph e. currently valid (not expired) PD-6. Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages is trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. For this reason, the Temecula Police Department has imposed a mandatory training for all employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. Contact the Temecula Police Crime Prevention and Plans Officer at (951) 695-2773 to schedule a training date. Training must be completed priorto the grand opening of this business and periodic updated training when new employeeslmanagement is hired. All alcohol training is provided free of charge by the Temecula Police Department: A second option is to have all employees and management attend the mandatory L.E.A.D. training provided by Alcoholic Beverage Control. Contact ABC Riverside (951) 782-4400) for scheduled training classes. Proof of completion must be presented to the police department priorto opening. PD-7. Police officers, sheriffs deputies and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at any time during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer (Sections 25616, 25753, and 25755 B&P; 148 and 241 (b) PD-6. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disorderly house is a licensed outlet (on or off sale) that: (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc; and/or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution narcotics, etc. The licensed premise includes the parking lot (Section 25601 B&P; 316 PC). PD-9. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to be a problem for the local law enforcement agency by needing an undue number of calls for service. The licensed premise includes the parking lot (Sections 24200 (a) (B&P). PD-10. Signs a. Stores (license Types 20 and 21) must post one or more customerwarning signs in the store (see form ABC 299 for wording). (Section 25612.5 ©7 B&P. b. All on and off sale licensees must post warning signs reading, "Warning: Drinking spirits, beer, coolers, wine and other alcoholic beverages may increase cancer risk and during pregnancy, can cause birth defects." Sections 126001(b)(1)(D)(1)snd 12601(b)(4)(E). CCR. PD-11. Refer any and all questions to the Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit (951) 695-2773. COL, ~ TY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT COMML. CITY AGENCY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH JUh 1 0 2008 City of Temecula Planning Department c/o Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 6 June 2008 RE: PA08-0122 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA08- 0122 for the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application to allow a grocery store larger than 10,000 square feet with alcohol sales, ABC License Type 20 for beer and wine. The Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market will be open, Monday-Sunday, 7:00 AM to midnight, under the applicant: Andrew Hedin. The planning application statement that there are no known existing hazardous materials on this site, only normal cleaning agents that will be used beyond the self contained Freon in the refrigeration systems. The market is located along the Rancho California Road corridor northeast of the I-15 freeway (APN 944-290-012) in the City of Temecula. Water and sewer availability for customer use can be found along this corridor. However, food vending, restaurant or expansion use of the market shall require food plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. Please call Bonnie Dierking, Supervising RES at 951.461.0284 within 24 hours of the City's receipt fax of these conditions. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.600.6180 Sincerely, Gregor Dellenbach, REHS EHS080937 Land Use and Water Engineering • 39493 Los Alamos Road. Murrieta. CA 92562 • (951) 600-6180 • FAX (951) 600-6181 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AMENDING THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SECTIONS 17.22.140 THROUGH 17.22.156 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE) TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE SIZE FOR RETAIL AND SPECIALTY GROCERY STORES IN SUB- AREA B FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET, PLUS MINOR MISCELLANEOUS CLEAN- UP REVISIONS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08- 0125)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On October 8, 2002 the City Council approved the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO), Planning Application No. PA00-0139. B. The Ordinance was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. On May 30, 2008, The Bergman Company, submitted Planning Application No. PA08-0125, a Zoning Code Amendment to modify the Temecula Village PDO to allow for specialty and retail grocery stores up to 15,000 square feet with approval of a Conditional Use Permit, and other minor clean up revisions. The applicant also filed Planning Application Nos. PA08-0123, Major Modification, and PA08-0122, Conditional Use Permit (Fresh & Easy/Pad C at Temecula Village). D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and environmental review on October 15, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08-0125 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City and is consistent with the Municipal Code and Development Code for the City of Temecula; The Zoning Code (Planned Development Overlay-5) amendment has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the policies and standards of the City's General Plan, which protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed 73, 969 square foot specialty and retail grocery market is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted'General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the PDO Amendment Application, PA08-0125: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed PDO Amendment application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA00-0140 on October 8, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed PDO Amendment Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed PDO Amendment application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the. baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the PDO Amendment application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed PDO Amendment application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the PDO Amendment Application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA08- 0125, an amendment to the Temecula Village PDO-5, as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of October 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held oh the 15th day of October 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CC ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (SECTIONS 17.22.140 THROUGH 17.22.156 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE) TO INCREASE THE ALLOWABLE SIZE FOR RETAIL AND SPECIALTY GROCERY STORES IN SUB-AREA B FROM 10,000 SQUARE FEET TO 15,000 SQUARE FEET, PLUS MINOR MISCELLANEOUS CLEAN- UP REVISIONS (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08- 0125) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby, find, determine and declare that: A. The proposed amendments to the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District-5 (Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 of the Temecula Municipal Code) were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2008, to consider the proposed amendments at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the matter. C. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed amendments, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-_recommending that the City Council approve the proposed amendments to the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District-5 (Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 of the Temecula Municipal Code). D. On November 18, 2008, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments at which time all persons interested in the proposed amendments had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters, and following receipt of all public testimony closed the hearing. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the proposed amendments to the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District-5 (Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 of the Temecula Municipal Code) hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City and is consistent with the Municipal Code and Development Code for the City of Temecula; The Zoning Code (Planned Development Overlay-5) amendment has been reviewed and determined to be in conformance with the policies and standards of the City's General Plan, which protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. The proposed 13, 969 square foot specialty and retail grocery market is compatible with surrounding land uses and will not have an adverse effect on the community because it remains consistent with the goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the City Council has considered the proposed PDO Amendment Application. The City Council has also reviewed and considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA00-0140 on October 8, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the City Council finds that the proposed PDO Amendment Application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the City Council also finds that the proposed PDO Amendment application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the PDO Amendment application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed PDO Amendment application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the PDO Amendment application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District-5 (Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 of the Temecula Municipal Code) by replacing it in its entirety with the revised text as shown in Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of, Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 08- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY REVISED 2008 Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Chapter 17.22, Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 Table of Contents 17.22.140 Title 17.22.142 Purpose and Intent 17.22.143 Project Vision 17.22.144 Relationship Wth Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines 1. Development Standards 2. Design Guidelines 3. Approval Authority 17.22.146 Use Regulations 17.22.14x! Schedule of Permitted Uses 17.22.150 Design Standards and Setback Standards 17.22.152 Vehicular Circulation System Standards 17.22.154 Architectural and Landscape Design Standards 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits Exhibit 17.22.156 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board Text of new section 17.22.156: 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Temecula Villac Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with tf requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in tf Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in tY Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.140 TITLE Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 shall be known as "PDO-5" (Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.142 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) is intended to provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique office/retail and residential area within the City. PDO-5 encompasses 22.97 acres and is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Way. PDO-5 has been divided into three distinctive sub areas, as depicted on Exhibit A (Conceptual Site Plan & Sub Area Map). Sub Area A consists of office/retail property which immediately abuts existing single-family residential to the east. Sub Area B consists of the remainder of the office/retail area. Sub Area C consists of M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling units/acre) which encompasses the rear portion of the site and abuts existing single- family residential to the south. The PDO area is surrounded by existing single-family development to the northeast, east and south and multi-family development to the northwest. The property to the west is currently vacant, but zoned M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling units/acre). This special overlay zoning district regulation is intended to permit a range of neighborhood convenience uses, which are compatible and complimentary to the existing residential development and M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12 dwelling units/acre) proposed as part of the PDO. Performance standards, in addition to those referenced from the City's Development Code and City-wide Design Guidelines, have been provided to ensure internal project compatibility as well as compatibility with the adjacent single-family residential development and to protect these adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Development Code. (Ord. 99-03 § 2) 17.22.143 PROJECT VISION The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay Districf (PDO) is intended to provide a comprehensive planning approach to the development of 22.97 acres. As discussed above, the project has been divided into three distinctive sub-areas, which have been created to foster an overall development to serve the needs of existing and future residents. While it is not feasible to create a pure "Village Center" at this location because the project is considered "in-fill," the project will include many design features, which are found in a \~illage Center. These features include: pedestrian scale of development, unique signage, gathering places, transit provisions and neighborhood serving uses. This is accomplished through its design, development standards, permitted and conditionally permitted uses and guidelines that will be implemented at the Development Plan stage. Sub Areas A & B comprises the officelretail component of the project. Uses in Sub Area A have been selected which provide support services to existing and future residents. These uses are limited in size and scope and are intended to be compatible with the existing single-family residential to the east. Single story elevations have been included to help to create a pedestrian scale. Drive-through facilities have been prohibited in Sub Area A. This area will also provide a place for existing and future residents to work. Uses in Sub Area B have been chosen that cater to both the pedestrian and the automobile. Existing and future residents, as well as passing motorists will be able to utilize potential services provided in this area. Some auto-oriented uses are permitted in Sub Area B. This is a necessary component to the project, as it will serve to internalize vehicle trips and reduce vehicle trips to auto-oriented services along Rancho California Road. Sub Area C is the residential component of the PDO. A total of one hundred sixty (160) units may be developed in this area. As depicted on Exhibit A, multi-family residential development is envisioned in this Sub Area, although other residential and limited non- residential uses are also envisioned in this Sub Area (reference Section 17.22.146, Use Regulations). Large landscaped buffer areas have been provided between this Sub Area and the existing single-family development to the east and south. Several obstacles to pedestrian access exist within the Sub Areas, as well as to the existing single-family residential to the east and south, the existing multi-family residential to the north (across Rancho California Road) and to planned multi-family residential development to the west. A comprehensive sidewalk plan, which has been coordinated with the landscape plan, is included as Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). The Sidewalk Plan has been modified though Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification); however, the original intent pedestrian access within PDO-5 has not been modified with this Amendment to PDO-5 (PA08-0125). This plan will foster pedestrian access within the site. When coupled with the existing/proposed pedestrian network, obstacles to pedestrian movement will be greatly reduced. 17.22.144 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES A. The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District is contained in Table 17.22.148. B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.03.050, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area. 1. Development Standards. * •~ a. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.08) that would apply to any development within a Neighborhood Commercial zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for Sub Area A. a b. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.08) that would apply to any development within a Community Commercial zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for Sub Area B. c. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.06) that would apply to any development within a Medium Density Residential zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for Sub Area C. This includes site open space and private open space requirements, as well as overall project density. d. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code will apply to Sub Areas A, B & C. e. Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code will apply to Sub Areas A, B, and C. 2. Design Guidelines. The City-Wide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. a. Chapter 3 (General Commercial Design Guidelines) and Chapter 4 (Specific Commercial Development Type Design Guidelines) for Sub Area A and Sub Area B. b. Chapter 5 (Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines) for Sub Area C. 3. Approval Authority. The Conceptual Site Plan is depicted in Exhibit A. Approximate building square footage and location, as well as approximate location of parking, drive lanes, access points and landscaping, are shown on this Exhibit. It should be noted .that this Site Plan has been modified through Planning Application No. PA06-0019 (Major Modification), Planning Application No. PA06-0292 (Minor Modification), Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification); however, the original intent of PDO-5 has not been modified. Conformance with Exhibit A as revised, as well as the provisions contained below, will allow the Approval Authority for projects approved under PDO-5 as follows: a. Permitted uses, which are within Sub Area A and Sub Area B of PDO-5, and are consistent with the provisions contained within PDO-5, shall be a staff level approval and shall not require a noticed public hearing. Those permitted uses found to not be consistent with the above shall be heard by the Planning Director at a noticed public hearing. b. Conditionally Permitted uses, which are within Sub Area A and Sub Area B of PDO-5, and are consistent with the provisions contained within PDO- 5, shaii be approved by the Planning Director and will require a noticed public hearing. c. The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Uses within Sub Area C. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. (Ord. 99-03 § 2) 17.22.146 USE REGULATIONS The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay district is contained in Table 17.22.148. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use shall be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with a " ", the use is prohibited within the zone. Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B A Adult business _ _ _ Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)` - C - Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)` - P - Airports _ _ _ Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities - - - Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) - - - Alcoholic beverage sales _ C _ Ambulance services _ _ _ Animal hospital (indoor only) _ _ _ Antique restoration _ ~ _ Antique sales p p _ Apparel and accessory shops p p _ Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) - - - Arcades (pinball and video games) - - - Art supply stores p p _ Auction houses _ _ _ Auditoriums and conference facilities - C • - Automobile dealers (new and used) - - - Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoordisplay - - - Automobile Oil Change/Cube Services with no major repairs - - - Automobile painting and body shop - - - Automobile repair services _ _ _ Automobiie rental _ C _ Automobile salvage yards/impound yards - - - Automobile service stations - p - Automotive parts -sales _ _ _ Automotive service stations selling beer andlor wine -with or without an automated car wash' - - _ B Bakery goods distribution _ _ _ Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C Bakery retail _ p _ Bakery wholesale _ _ _ Banks and financial institutions, without drive-through P p - Banks and financial institutions, with drive-through - P - Barberand beauty shops p p _ Bed and breakfast _ C _ Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p p _ Billiard parlor/pool hall _ _ _ Binding of books and similar publications - - - Blood bank p p _ Blueprint and duplicating and copy services - P - Bookstores p p _ Bowling alley _ _ _ Building material sales _ _ _ Butcher shop _ p _ C Cabinet shop _ _ _ Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) p p - Candy/confectionery sales p p _ Car wash, full service _ _ _ Carpet and rug cleaning _ _ _ Catering services _ p _ Clothing sales p p _ Coins, purchase and sales P P - Cold storage facilities _ _ _ Communications and microwave installations - - C Communications equipment sales - C - Community care facilities, less than 5,000 square feet' - - - Computer sales and service P P - Congregate care housing for the elderly, less than 5,000 square feet2~ - - _ Construction equipment sales, service or rental - - - Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental - - - Construction trailer p p p Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use q' g C Convalescent facilities, less than 5,000 square feet* - C P Convenience market _ _ _ Costume rentals p p _ Crematoriums _ _ _ Cutlery sales _ p _ D Data processing equipment and systems C C - Daycare centers - C C Delicatessen C p _ Discount department store _ _ _ Distribution facility _ _ _ Drug store/pharmacy p p _ Dry cleaners, no drive through p p _ Dry cleaning plant _ _ _ E Emergency shelters _ _ _ Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) - p - Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) - - - F Family day care homes (small and large) - - p Feed and grain sales _ _ _ Financial, insurance, real estate offices P p - Fire and police stations _ _ _ Floor covering sales _ p _ Florist shop p p _ Food processing , _ _ _ _ Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity - - - Freight terminals _ _ _ Fuel storage and distribution _ _ _ Funeral parlors, mortuary _ _ _ Furniture sales _ _ _ Furniture transfer and storage - - - io Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service - _ _ Gas distribution, meter and control station _ _ _ General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.* C P - Glass and mirrors, retail sales _ p _ Governmental offices, less than 5,000 sq. ft.* C P - Granny Flat _ _ p Grocery store, retail & specialty less than X0,90815,000 sq. ft. - C - Grocery store, wholesale _ _ _ Guest House _ _ p Guns and firearm sales _ _ _ H Hardware stores, less than 2,000 square feet* p p _ Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.)* - C - Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)* - P - Health food store C p _ Health care facility, less than 5,000 square feet* P P C Heliports _ _ _ Hobby supply shop p p _ Home and business maintenance service _ _ _ Hospitals _ _ _ Hotels/motels _ _ _ I Ice cream parlor p p _ Impound yard _ _ _ Interior decorating service p p _ J Junk or salvage yard _ _ _ K Kennel _ _ _ Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C L Laboratories, film, medical - P - Laundromat p p - Laundry service (commercial) - - - Libraries, museums and galleries (private) C P - Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution - - - Liquor stores and wine shops - C - Lithographic service - - - Locksmith p p - M Machine shop - - - Machinery storage yard - - - Mail order businesses P p - Manufactured homes - - P Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the Following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, - - - packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no outside storage), such asjewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, - - - packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semirefinad products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage _ _ _ Massage _ _ _ Medical equipment sales/rental P P - Membership clubs, organizations, lodges - - - iz Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C Mini-storage or mini-warehouse - - _ Mobile home sales and service - _ _ Motion picture studio _ _ _ Motorcycle sales and service _ _ _ Movie theaters _ C _ Musical and recording studio - C - N Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club - C - Nurseries (retail) _ C _ Nursing homes/convalescent homes, less than 5,000 square feet' - - - O Office equipmentlsupplies, sales/services C P - Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft.' - C - Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance' p p _ P Paint and wallpaper stores - P - Parcel delivery services _ _ _ Parking lots and parking structures, appurtenant to the primary use C C Pawnshop _ p _ Personal service shops P p - PesY control services - _ _ _ Pet grooming/pet shop p p _ Photographic studio p p _ Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) - - - Postal distribution _ _ _ Postal services p p _ Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) - C - Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) C C - 13 Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C Q Reserved - - - R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P P - Radio/television transmitter - - - Recreational vehicle parks - - - Recreational vehicle sales - - - Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building - - _ Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard - - - Recycling collection facilities - P - Recycling processing facilities - - - Religious institution, without a day care or private school C C C Religious institution, with a private school C C - Religious institution, with a day care ~ C C - Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business) C C _ Residential, multiple-family housing - - P Residential, single-family detached - - P Residential, duplex - - P Residential, single-family attached (greater than two units) - - P Residential care facilities for the elderly C C P Restaurant, drive-in/fast food - C - Restaurants and other eating establishments C P - Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment - C - Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage in BP and LI) - - _ Rooming and boarding houses - C P S Scale, public - ~ - - - Schools, business and professional C C - Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C C - Scientific research and development offices and laboratories - - - Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care) " is Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C Solid waste disposal facility _ _ _ Sports and recreational facilities _ _ _ Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building - - - Swap Meet, outdoor _ _ _ Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales nao~tdoor storage - P - T Tailor shop p p _ Taxi or limousine service _ _ _ Temporary real estate tract offices - - - Tile sales _ p _ Tobacco shop _ C _ Tool and die casting _ _ _ Transfer, moving and storage - - - Transportation terminals and stations - - - Truck rentals (no sales or /service) _ _ _ TVNCR repair p p _ U Upholstery shop _ _ _ V °~ Vending machine sales and service - - - Veterinarian clinic w/overnight facilities (indoor kennels) - P - W Warehousing/distribution _ _ _ Watch repair p p _ Wedding chapels _ _ _ Welding shop _ _ _ Welding supply and service (enclosed) - - - Y Reserved _ _ _ ~s Table 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District Description of Use A B C Z Reserved _ _ 1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G) of the Development Code, special standards for the sale of alcoholic beverages. 2. All Senior Project housing residential projects shall use the develcpment and performance standards for the M (Medium Density Residential) zone and the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H of the Temecula Development Code. The Director of Planning may approve an increase in floor area up to 15% for those uses that have a maximum square footage specified. (Vrd. yy-US ~ L) 17.22.150 DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The following standards are designed to increase the compatibility between uses within and adjacent to the project. The standards are to be implemented based upon the appropriate Sub Area. A. Sub Area A Landscape Setback/Buffer. A landscaped buffer area, not less than twenty-five feet (25') in width shall be provided between Sub Area A, and the existing residential development to the east. Reference Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section). The landscaping shall include (at a minimum) specimen trees, shrubs, and appropriate ground cover. No parking areas are allowed in this visual buffer area. A waif shall be provided on the eastern property line between Sub Area A, and the existing residential development to the east. The height of the wall shall be six feet and may be increased to eight feet if deemed necessary and appropriate by the Community Development Director. A minimum twenty-five foot (25') landscape setback from the property line shall be provided along the Rancho California Road frontage. No parking or drive lanes may be allowed to encroach into this area. Reference Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section). Ib 2. Pedestrian Linkages. • Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). • Pedestrian linkages shall be provided between Sub Area B, Sub Area A and Rancho California F"toad. Pedestrian access between Sub Area C and Sub Area A will be via Sub Area B. A pedestrian linkage shall be provided to the east of the drive lane that connects Sub Area B to Sub Area C. 3. Building Height. All buildings in Sub Area A shall be one-story. Varied roof heights shall not exceed twenty-eight feet (28') in height. Towers and other architectural features shall not exceed thirty-nine feet (39') in height. 4. Gathering Saaces. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian gathering space shall be provided in Sub Area A. Gathering spaces shall contain the following items: • Shading. (i.e., umbrellas, shade structures). • Plantings (i.e., a mixture of trees, shrubs, vines). These may be within planter areas or potted. • Seating. (i.e., chairs, benches, seat walls). • Eating area. 5. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided in either Sub Area A or B. Final location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer. 6. Loading Areas. All required loading spaces shall be located in the front of the buildings. No loading shall be allowed on the side or the rear of the buildings. 7. Trash enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted on the rear sides of the buildings or along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with landscaping. Exact locations shall be determined at the Development Plan stage. B. Sub Area B. Landscape Setback. A minimum twenty-fwe foot (2~) (20') landscape setback from the property line shall be provided along the Rancho Califomia Road frontage. No parking or drive lanes may be allowed to encroach into this area. Reference Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section) as modified by Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification) and Amendment No. 1 to PDO-5 (PA08-0125). n 2. Pedestrian Linkages. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). Twe-(2~ One (1) pedestrian linkages shall be provided between Sub Area B and Sub Area C per Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification) and Amendment No. 1 to PDO-5 (PA08-0125). In addition to the pedestrian linkage depicted on Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan), a pedestrian linkage shall be provided to the east of the drive lane that connects Sub Area B to Sub Area C. Pedestrian linkages shall be Pr6vided between Sub Area B, Sub Area A and Rancho California Road. 3. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided in either Sub Area A or B. Final location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer. 4. Gathering Spaces. A minimum of one (1) pedestrian gathering space shall be provided in Sub Area B. Gathering spaces shall contain the following items: • Shading. (i.e., umbrellas, shade structures). • Plantings (i.e., a mixture of trees, shrubs, vines). These may be within planter areas or potted. • Seating. (i.e., chairs, benches, seat walls). • Eating area. 5. Loading Areas. All required loading spaces shall be located on the side of the buildings and are to be adequately screened. No loading shall be allowed at the rear of the buildings. 6. Trash enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted on the rear sides of the buildings or along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with landscaping. Exact locations shall be determined at the Development Plan stage. C. Sub Area C. Building Setbacks. All structures shall be setback a minimum of forty-five (45) feet along the eastern and southerly property line, which abuts existing single-family residential development. Reference Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-6b (Section). 2. Pedestrian Linkages. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). -, - is • A minimum of one (1) pedestrian linkage shall be provided between Sub Area C and Sub Area B and between Sub Area B or Sub Area C and Sub Area A. • A pedestrian pathway system shall be provided within Sub Area C. 3. Building Height. The height of structures shall not exceed three (3) stories or forty (40) feet in height. 4. Building Plotting. Buildings on the eastern property line shall be plotted so that they will not view into the existing residences to the east of the project. The ends of units or garages shall be located on the perimeter. 17.22.152 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM STANDARDS Vehicular Circulation System Standards-have been developed to assure that adequate vehicular access ingress and egress exist for the project, that internal project circulation and vehicle stacking are sufficient and that necessary emergency vehicle access requirements are met. A Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit A) has been prepared with input from the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments. Locations grid approximate square footage for building envelopes, access points from Rancho California Road and the western road, drive lanes, parking lots and parking lot landscaping have been provided on the conceptual plan in an effort to depict typical overall development of the site. Minor changes or modifications to the conceptual plan may occur provided they are reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula at the development plan stage. Access Points: Three (3) access points to the project have been provided to the site from Rancho California Road. Access to Sub Area A shall be provided from the easterly access paint on Rancho California Road and by a drive lane, which is perpendicular to Rancho California Road (through Sub Area B). 2. Access to Sub Area B shall be provided from all three (3) access points on Rancho California Road. 3. Access to Sub Area C shall be provided from the two westerly access points on Rancho California Road and fram the property to the west via the westerly Rancho California Road project access point. 17.22.154 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES Architectural and Landscape Design Guidelines have been included for the commercial component of PDO-5 (Sub Area A and Sub Area B). These guidelines, when used in conjunction with the Citywide Design Guidelines, will provide the necessary assurances that a comprehensive and high quality project is developed on the site. Unless expressly stated below, Residential Architectural Guidelines for Sub Area Care contained within Chapter 5 of the City-Wide Design Guidelines. 19 A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Form, Height And Massing A variety of building form, height and massing techniques shall be utilized to achieve a pedestrian scale of development. The Guidelines contained below correspond to the Conceptual Building Elevations (Elevations), contained in Exhibit D. The Elevations are representative of the design concept that is strongly encouraged in the commercial component of Temecula Village. Final design of the individual buildings will utilize the design concepts depicted on the Elevations and may vary from the Elevations depicted in Exhibit D. • The architectural design of the office and retail area in Sub Area A shall be single-story structures with covered walkways, colonnades, arcades and openings that create interest. Structures in Sub Area B may be increased to two- stories; however, they must meet the criteria mentioned above. • Two-story buildings shall not exceed thirty-four feet (34') in height. Exceptions to this height limitation, up to forty feet (40') in height, shall be allowed for towers and other architectural features. • Offsets in planes shall be used to reduce the mass of building walls, accent entry areas, and create architectural interest. • Building forms shall be of simple geometry with sculptural or traditional forms acceptable. - • Second floor balconies/dormers is a method that can be used to reduce the mass of large buildings. • Pediment entries, colorful window and door trim shall be used for accent purposes. • Building entries shall be defined and articulated through the use of items such as columns and stone veneers. • Recessed windows and entryways shall be used, especially at the ground level as they add interest to the product. • Windows or window-type elements are encouraged on second story elements. • Windows on the second floor should line up with windows on the first floor, making the column/structure apparent. • All sides of the buildings shall receive adequate detail treatment; however, reduced articulation shall be permitted for those sides of the buildings that are not clearly visible from public view. • The use of arcades is encouraged on front elevations of larger buildings (Shops "B" and Building "F") and on the western elevations of the buildings in Sub Area A (Buildings "G", "H" and "I"). 2. Colors 8 Materials _,~. The colors and materials for all Sub Areas shall be consistent with the color and material board (Exhibit E). The purpose of the color and material board is to provide continuity between the components of the Temecula Village PDO. zo A. Colors The predominant building color includes a whites, yellows, tans and browns, similar t the City of Temecula and other Southern colors are the most appropriate for trim. Brighter colors shall be limited to signs, detailing related to pedestrian areas. B. Materials mixture of earth tones (grays, o colors already used throughout California cities. Wann or light doors, window trim and other • Cement Plaster, or similar materials will be used predominantly throughout as will natural color ledger stone, wood trellis and copper patina metal roofing. • The use of canvas awnings is strongly encouraged over windows and entries. • Textured concrete (poured in place or tilt up) and concrete block may be used on building elevations. • High quality, dark colored roofing, such as sealed non-reflective metal, wood or concrete shingles or shakes, and asphalt/concrete composites are recommended. • Beams, posts and wooden or stone columns should be simple with camps and toes. Care should be taken so that the width of the column is in proportion to the scale of the building. 3. Roof Forms • Flat roofs with simple horizontal or gabled parapets are encouraged. Roofs shall be high enough to hide rooftop equipment. • Rooftops shall be designed to be visually attractive when viewed from adjacent buildings or roadways. • Varied roof heights shall be incorporated to reduce building massing. • The use of cornices is strongly encouraged. B. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES 7. Project-Wide Landscaping Plant communities currently represented on the site are annual grasslands and woodland tree plantings. Existing development in the area also establishes a plant palette for the project to draw from. The landscape theme for the site development is intended to compliment the existing development, while at the same time establishing it own identity. The landscape theme is also intended to support the architectural guidelines by creating screens and buffers where needed and views where opportunities exist. Guidelines: Plant material selection for street. trees shall be determined by the Chapter 8 (Public Design Guidelines) of the City-Wide Design Guidelines and complement the existing street trees on Rancho California Road. zi • Introduced plant materials will be installed so that they reflect the surrounding plant species. • Irrigation systems shall include low flow drip systems, consistent with the Section 17.32 of the City's Development Code (Water-Efficient Landscape Design). • Landform grading and the use of berming shall be used in coordination with development pad landscaping to screen parking and loading areas. 2. Project Edges Project edges will be the most visible components of the project. These edges include: Rancho California Road edge, residential (internal)/office/retail (internal) edge, residential (internal)/residential (external) edge and residential (internal)/residential (external) edge. The intent is to provide a comprehensive landscape approach to the project, while paying attention to the particular needs of each edge condition. Plans anti' Sections are provided to guide future Development Plans in these areas. The landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections are included as Exhibit C and Exhibits C-1a through C-7b. a. Rancho California Road Edge Landscaping along Rancho California Road will be complimentary to existing landscaping along Rancho California Road, as well as serve to identify the project. Streetscape plantings will be coordinated with interior streetscape and parking treatments as well as with adjacent parcel landscaping. Enhanced project entries at two locations will provide a gateway into the project. Reference Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section): Rancho California RoadlSub Area B Interface and Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area A Interface. Implementation of the requirements contained on Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section) have been altered per Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification); however, the original intent of PDO-5 has not been modified with Amendment No. 1 to PDO-5 (PA-08-0125). b. Residential (External)/Office/Retail Edge This edge will serve to buffer the proposed development in Sub Area A from the existing single-family residential to the east. A minimum twenty (20) foot landscape buffer shall be required from the eastem property line to any structure. An architecturally treated wall shall be constructed on the eastern property line to further serve as a buffer. Evergreen trees with broad canopies may be utilized to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section): Sub Area A Interface at East. c. Residential (Internal)/Office/Retail (Intemah Edge This edge will be viewed by residents living adjacent to the project and will act as a buffer between the development and residential use. Native vegetation in good condition will be retained where possible and layered densely planted evergreen landscape materials will be provided for further screening. Reference Exhibits C- 4a (Plan) and C-4b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area B Interface and Exhibits C- zz 5a (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area A Interface. Implementation of the requirements contained on Exhibits C-4a (Plan) and C-4b (Section) have been altered per Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification); however, the original intent of PDO-5 has not been modified with Amendment No. 1 to PDO-5 (PA-08-0125). d. Residential (Intemap/Residential (External) Edge Slopes created on the eastern and southern slopes will be extensively landscaped to meet current City Development Code standards. Since these are down slopes of various lengths, trees and shrubs are provided near the top of the slope to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. The southwestern portion of the site will be graded and planted with turf, trees and shrubs in order to provide an active recreational open space for local residents. Reference Exhibits C-tia (Plan) and C-tib (Section): Sub Area C Interface at East and Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at South. 3. Major Entries Special landscaping will occur at the major entries that will identify the points of entry and set the tone for the center. Plantings will be coordinated with the Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify major entries, as follows. Guidelines: Accent trees with fall or flowering color should be used as identify plantings. Low-scale walls, shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used to highlight key areas, such as the base of project entry monuments. Trees should be massed to create an effect similar to native plantings in undisturbed areas. 23 / x x ~ ~ x x ~~ _ °z~ Z w • x O x ~ W J J x • • w? ~? ~ p~ U a • ~~ ~ Q U ~ U p X • • Q m Q o~ ~m • m ~ °~a N a ww Q • • • w~ O~ ~ = W OUa o~ a ~N v i ~ mod a ° aJr ~~ • ~ ~ z U W Z~ W UY J x • • • • • • • • • Z Y W ~..~VI UW ) X) X X X X x x x ~' U ~ W Z tD VI _ Z 0 _Q Z ~ O J N ~ F- W Q Wg ~ U za ~~ O ~~ ~~ o U J J ~3 Z ~ ow W WW J ~~ O Q ova ~v~~ v ¢ /T ' J Q W O Z Z Qa Z I .Zj W _ZW Z ~ Q'~ ~ZJ (7 wr- wN U w ON ONd J~ ~~ Z a 4p ``mom i~ JO J~ O C7W QU Qd' J ~W ~W ~x o a~ NO V1 Vl U Or Q Q -~ U to pp~'- O p d j ~ N N W M Z O c 7 w w . y N ~ ~ U cn 3 m~ ~w m W n-za Q O U ~ ~~ USU. 5N ~ ~ _ ~U w ° ~ w N ~ Q g3? a ~ ~ _ J N Y J J ~oJ3 J ma~ o zW ~ W g g cnc~?a J U a o~ Z W W~ ~O O J ~ Q U Val p C e~ D p ~~ D Qp ° D v D ~ ~' ~DQ~p ~ a do D ~~ e D D ~ ° DvDQY~ ~Dao d ~ o p ~ a D Q '' D [l D ~ ~ ~ i d 9~-,Z wl 0 a~ ~w U2 xg ~a z ~® w a of J Q N U ~a N {- J m V ~a xZ -l Zo J U W J U p V U O za = ~ aJ O a U O ~C~ ZZ 4.~ ~ C~Z stn ~Z 3a Z w3 oQ opt go ~`~ ~U r} ~ m J ? U m W W = ~ ¢ ~ O ern tn~ aU ~ o O ~' ~ ~ C ~~ Z ~ W z~ o d ~ V ~ ~~ 0 ~ W ^J..a_d w ~a NJ rZ c ~ ~U 4~ 0~ WGz U J O~J O~ rm 2Q U Q U Z z ~ ~ ¢ a ~~? ,z,.,o ti ® N 3 ~ tnN F- U Secondary Entries Secondary entries delineate the entry to the project interior. They are located at the westerly and easterly edges of the project along Rancho California Road. Design elements may include accent plantings, low scale walls, and monumentation. Guidelines: • Shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used at the base of project entry monumentation. • Accent trees, such as palm trees or crape myrtle varieties should be used to identify entries. za J Q v ya}. ~ Q F U pd K _ W • p Q N • ~oZ a z° • oin- o • YN Z m • Q Q Y W • m ~ O W • W m - J O.' N< ~ o ~~ F Z oa a X x gv=i ? v o~ ~ ~ X U w w a • wW r~ p~ ~ Q ~ UQ • f1r U W X LL O~ OQ ~ ~ X Q UN iDN x Z x x 0 x~ 2 N ~w ~ I Q z~ w U ~a ~ z O o~ J -~ U ~Q c Z3 Z `.'w J ~ a ~a~ M °zZyay X x x C li ~NF X • ' ' X X X X • • X x ~ ~ `W +' X • / J X Z O U UQ d p N ~ CC~ N Q•2S ~ ~~ ~ o Z ~ G Z U Uw o ~}d} w KZ Q ~~ C~92 ' (jF ~ WNU WH WN 3Na 3 ~ x • OW w w ~-o a ~'a Jm ~ ~p pm p~ 2~ '"1p0 ~_ p ~Z U X20 ~w pw~ ~U ~W NNU NO ~N aQU p~ ~ ~.S v a _ a oa mU Z~ .9-.Z ~~ ~a} O O N~ O C9 ~ (~ ~ Z t9 2 ~ _ Y N WO ~ N Z ~ U Q~ O N W O Z _ J r °' S ~ a v ~~ Na o~ z~ ~~ w ~v=i i ~® ~v=i w¢ w3 '~ O df ~ O C ; ~ ~` ~ v m vi ~/ z 0 0'~ D "1 a~ o a vWi-~ ~ ~ ~ v~i~ a~ v~ o Dd ~ 1 a WMw O Q ~i f.~ W D Qp ,1. N ~ v~v a ° p ~rZ D~~~ x wjw ~ ~~ N O r a3~ d~ t n'f ~ p 1' fnYJJ ~p J3 D~~ ~~ O00a~ ~~ C z w Q !' U ~ W Z ~ ° D v DoD , ~ ,!' ~ D ~ ~ p ~ !' ~ ~~ ~ j' 3~ ~ W r j L zW a~ O 3~ ~' cna ~~ J •C in ~~ a4 ~v ~3 W ~ z ~ O U ~ W ~ ,~ J J ~ a~ ~3 o3v oz w ~J a ~ z rno ,S ~® vri3~ vriv~ Project-Wide Hardscape Concept Hardscape elements should be used in coordination with the architecture and landscaping to provide a link between the street edge and individual developments. Attention to hardscape details can create a strong sense of community by relating different developments to an overriding theme. In addition, property hardscaping can improve pedestrian safety, movement and visual enjoyment of public areas. a. Paving Materials The use of enriched paving treatment has been recommended for the major entry into the site and intersections to highlight key areas of the streetscape. Guidelines: • Paving materials that incorporate natural rock or stone are highly recommended. • Major intersection and project entry crosswalks shall be highlighted by enriched paving treatments such as stamped, colored concrete, interlocking pavers or cobblestones to visually denote crosswalks. • Near buildings, paving materials should be consistent with major intersection treatments, using interlocking pavers, cobblestone, natural stone, or textured concrete. zs SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL FREE STANDING PILASTER W/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE do BUILT-IN LAMP TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 1 NTS INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL C08BLE STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE TYPICAL :'~I,' ~ FREE STANDING PILASTER W/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE do BUILT-IN LAMP TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 2 NTS b. Street Furniture Hardscape elements such as benches, bollards, paving and light standards should reflect the theme of the overall commercial center, complimenting the architecture and landscape. Materials used in construction of street furniture should compliment architectural materials used on adjacent buildings. Safety and durability need special consideration. Guidelines: • Natural stone, rock, textured concrete, wood, or metal are all acceptable building materials for street furniture. • Street furniture should be located within gathering and/or shaded seating areas within the center. • All benches should be of simple design of wrought-iron metal, or concrete with supports and scroll detailing and finished natural wood slats for the sitting area. • Trash receptacles and other minor details particular to individual parcels must relate to the architectural style of buildings. z6 BENCH c. Walls and Fences When necessary for security or to mitigate grading, walls or retaining walls and fences can reinforce the project's identity and image. The material, style, and height of walls and fences shall in order to ensure visual consistency, provide an element of continuity throughout the center. Guidelines: • Construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project architecture with dark-toned hues and earthtone colors preferred. The use of a hedge/bollard treatment is acceptable and encouraged. • For walls built to screen ancillary structures adjacent to buildings such as trash enclosures, construction materials should compliment the architecture. • The horizontal mass of continuous walls should be softened by landscape planting and vines. • Tubular steel or an equivalent may be used for fencing. 4. Lighting Concept In the design of lighting, careful consideration must be given the overall architectural theme as well as to the safety of the site users. An emphasis should be made to emphasize human scale in public areas adjacent to buildings and along walks. Guidelines: • Warm white lighting is encouraged, bright colored or blinking lights shall not be allowed. • Light standards will blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, and other hardscape elements. • Design and placement of site lighting must minimize glare affecting adjacent properties, buildings and roadways. • Natural stone and concrete may be used for light standard bases. • All lighting shall be consistent with the Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. • "Old town Style" lighting fixtures, either attached to building or pedestal mounted along pedestrian walkways and gathering areas shall be utilized. n LIGHTING STANDARD 5. Signage Program A comprehensive sign program is provided for Temecula Village in order to meet the different type of Signage needs. Building-mounted signage will need to be oriented to both to the pedestrian (internal to the project) and motorist (along Rancho California Road). In addition, it will be necessary to be sensitive to the existing single-family development to the south and east of the project site. Monument signs will be permitted along the Rancho California Road frontage, at project entries, which identify the commercial center, as well as the major tenants. Lastly, directional signage will be necessary to safely guide throughout all Sub Areas. A. Guidelines Appropriate. • Generally, small, low key signage for tenant spaces. • Building mounted signs for project identity. • A limit of four colors on a sign. Additional colors are acceptable only when incorporating a company logo. • Eye level signs; window and door signs. • Signs consistent with building texture, color and architectural style. • Uniquely shaped signs that are related to the product or service provided (i.e., barber poll). • Signs that have illumination sources consistent with Mount Palomar lighting standards and restrictions. 2. Inappropriate • Typical "can" or "box" signs with entire face areas made of plastic. • Signs mounted above building rooflines (parapet), or roof-mounted signs. • Signs that incorporate any manner of mechanical movement, audible elements, flashing or intermittent lighting, and/or moving or otherwise animated forms. • Signs that interfere with or conflict with any traffic control device, create a safety hazard by obstructing the clear view of pedestrian or vehicular traffic or interfere with efficient operations of emergency vehicles. • Signs, which prevent free access to or from any fire escape, door, window or exit, or access to any standpipe. • Landscaping or the use of annual or ornamental flowers that form a sign or message. • Signs not in scale with the pedestrian orientation. • Vehicle signs. • Signs extending above the save or parapet, roof-mounted signs, non- projecting signs which project more than twelve inches (12") from a given building face. • Signs painted onto building surfaces or trash bins and their enclosures. • Signs with disproportionate, visually distracting, or reflective surfaced background or graphics. 28 Signs with non-contrasting background, graphics or font, which render the sign illegible. Inflatable signs. Off-site signage. B. General Sian Standards and Specifications • The area of a sign or logo with individual letters shall be measured by a rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol. • Planning and Building and Safety Departments' review and approval is required prior to the placing, erecting, moving, or reconstructing of any sign within the Specific Plan area. • All permanent signs shall require a permit prior to erecting or attaching the sign. • Signage that is not approved as part of the Development Plan process, shall be approved administratively by the Planning Director. • If a situation arises that is not covered by these sign regulations or the type of permit required, the Planning Director shall provide written interpretation after consulting `$ie City's Sign Ordinance. • All building-mounted signs shall meet or exceed all applicable city, state and federal codes. • All signs containing electrical components shall conform to the Uniform Lighting Code. C. Building-Mounted Signs 1. General. • Signs shall be placed to be compatible with the building and accent the architectural design of the structure. • Sign colors should be compatible with the building's color. • Signs and letter sizes shall be used which are complementary to the building scale. • Signs should have individually spaced letters. • Signs shall have concealed illumination source, either internal or external. 2. Wall signs. • Signs attached to front walls and/or side walls of buildings shall have a surface area not to exceed one (1) square foot per linear foot of the respective face of the building. Sign attached to rear walls of buildings shall have a surface area not exceeding one-half (Y:) square foot per linear foot of the surface area of the rear face of the building. No wall-mounted signs shall be permitted on the rear of the buildings in Sub Area A, which face the existing single-family residential development. • For storefronts thirty feet (30') wide or less, a maximum letter height of 8" is required. • For storefronts 30'-60' wide, a maximum letter height of 12" is required. 29 • For storefronts 60' wide or greater required. • The maximum letter height allowed a maximum letter height of 16" is is 24". 3. Permanent Window Signs. • Store identity, graphics, typography and/or company logo may be silkscreened or etched on the tenant's window. • The maximum square foot graphic area allowed per window shall not exceed four (4) square feet or fifteen percent (15%) of the total window area from the exterior of the building, whichever is greater. Signs will not be permitted on doors. 4. Awning Signs Twenty percent (20%) maximum coverage allowed of the total exterior surface of each awning. Internal illumination is prohibited. 5. Projecting Signs • No more than one (1) projecting sign will be allowed per tenant. • The maximum size may not exceed six (6) square feet and shall not extend more than three feet (3') from the wall surface. • Projecting signs shall only be attached to buildings and shall not be illuminated. 6. Hanging Signs and Under Canopy Signs • No more than one (1) hanging sign shall be allowed per tenant. • Signs are permitted under a canopy and parallel to the parking lot; maximum size of six (6) square feet; minimum of seven feet (7') vertical clearance shall be required from walking grade to the bottom of the sign. D. Monument Signs General Requirements All portions of signs, including the base, shall be constructed with materials and colors that are compatible with, and serve to complement the building. All monument signs shall include the address of the site. Numerals shall be no larger than ten inches (10") in height and no smaller than six inches (6") in height. Low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or annual color shall surround the base of the sign. The landscaping shall be a minimum of one (1) foot distance from the sign. 30 2. Specific Requirements Maior Monument Sign • One major monument sign, not to exceed nine feet (9') in height above grade with up to fifty (50) square feet of signage area shall be permitted at the project major entry. • Colors and materials for the sign shall reflect the center. • Up to five (5) tenants may be advertised on the sign. • Each tenant placard shall not exceed one foot (12°) high. 31 Minor Monument Signs • A minor entry monument sign, not to exceed five feet (5') in height above grade with up to thirty-six (36) square feet of signage area shall be permitted at each minor entry monument sign. • Colors and materials for the sign shall reflect the center. • Up to three (3) tenants may be advertised on the sign. • Each tenant placard shall not exceed ten inches (10") high. 32 E. Directional Signs • Shall consist of small-scale versions of monument sign design and contain graphics conforming to the design for monument signs and building mounted signs. • Shall have contrasting background/graphic colors. • Shall have direct or indirect concealed illumination. • Individual directional signs shall not exceed three (3) square feet in area, or have an overall height exceeding three feet (3') above finished grade. • Multiple-tenant directional signs shall not exceed twelve (12) square feet in area, or have an overall height exceeding six feet (6') above finished grade. • Shall not contain logos. 33 STUCCO FINISH PILASTER CAP I M 0 N ~ ~e~ ~ (~ e~ smra - RECESSED GLASS BLOCK W/ WROUGHT IRON GRILLE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED. TYPICAL 4 SIDES STUCCO FINISH MASONARY PILASTER DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE MOUNTED 70 PILASTER LEDGERSTONE VENEER PILASTER BASE ALTERNATE: COBBLE STONE VENEER PILASTER BASE FINISH GRADE 6" 2'-6" S0. TYP. 3'-6" S0. ELEVATION Pilaster Lamp /Directional Sign NTS Reference Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-6b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at East and Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at South. 3. Major Entries Special landscaping will occur at the major entries that will identify the points of entry and set the tone for the center. Plantings will be coordinated with the Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify major entries, as follows. 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Temecula Villac Planned Development Overlay District shall confonn and comply with t!- requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in tY Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in tY Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A. Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 1722.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 E. Color and Material Board 34 Exhibit A Conceptual Site Plan and Sub Area Map 9 «2 ey ~ b77 b bRbR pbp bdbb pbb pbbb Q ....Y ' ~~ " 48 ~-3: a ,'^"^7_ 9__ 7 7:d 7_677 g~~ ~:~~~ 'f ,, ® J b b b b d b b b b" b 7 .. .. . .... .. .... .... ........ } 8 Q !B~!! a ~ ............... ........ ~ ! ~ Q ..ee ~p Y i .. .. ... ..~~55 p~pp ~ ~ ~~jjgpg: y ~yg~: p Q~ ~ rei,~y 0 E E ~ ~ 4 1~ i i~g i 15 ~~g J '-~Y ~t:° ~r ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~c~lr~ ~~6~~~~~ ,;: ~ ' : ~ it :, ; , ,:. Isl.>, [~~ 4 F~~ k ~ b ~~~ 6 ~~B ~ ~~ p k E 4 O ~ C ® " e ~~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ pa "' g E g ~ g A ~ § q k f ~ ,.~ r Y~ l .. I ~ '' ~ ,:,~e ?..I~ k ~tl ~~ I 1 i Z 1~ ` ., ~ 7H 12188 f B ! t rr , r ~ I ~~ ~ r i B YL„ f~4fif-. 9fN ~ ~ ti,~ j! } l' "k' L1' (~ ~ ~`~/ i~ ~ I ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~' ~ _.... I ~. ., _\ x R ~~~"Yt MB. 13d/87~88 (>.. 04 ~ Jl;.;r /y' . ~' ~ ~ I [4. ~" L 8f~f ~f~ t ~ w Llv1 R8S1R 71 L ~:'=","' //' ~~ ?H.12189'3'; _:. ~ ; : _ 1 I'~;i ! i I Sc~h ~.. ~ ` ..:.: ,cyt... f ,..,.. .,..: .. _...: ~€"°:~~ .. ~. .. .. ~ 1.l iY _~- ~.: _"-;' _ - ~:a"~... a4(e7-es I~ ~ ~ {~ II'I '!; i_' I~ q A I I i; IJ I i I~. li: li t :.. ~.~ I~~`-~.~ ~~ i i r, ~~ I ~~ Lllfi ~';,~'; ',;I c ~ ~: ii!i', i' ~' I' I tl ;r ~ `I~ ;~ ~ ~!:IL.. '~j, I I i..,. III '~ it - , II ~; ;E'~ I .l: Ivp .; ;; ~.. ~: I ~ i , i ~; I; ~;; I,! I~I I ~f; i ~, j ~ - L. lal+_~~ri~ ~ E!: ~. i I - y I I I ~/ I! III 4: Mg. , .., .-`~ ~a ~~ E ~ ' ~~~ ~ ~ Q I F~u I F I i I $g~ I ~~b , ~______~ s6~ I I ~b >;3 ~;. .m ~M ~~/ 1 y~ % ~: Q - # ~. - ~'s: ~ t - c4,\ I vim. .q Q~o~~e ~) -"~ ---- \ }~ ~~ . 9 C _~ !e{t Y ~ d.-.. a H d __ _ I L?d m`8 ~~ ~cl k l i i i rn ~ S,.- J r~- ,,~ _ <. - ~ iY: ~. r -r ' ;~~ I: ._ III ~ /,( ~ J,. '.il.., I :. ' ~ I _-- ~ i ~il_ _.._ t I t .~. 6~ ~ _: - ~I it ; I~ ~ ~'akd.KY irl ~ y .__ ..~~I-- - Ir ~.~ I t 5 T,pi q I I~ "i';~irJ i~ i3 i~~. .__ iii _.._.... j fl,',~... ,~h (~`"~a-`~1 I~ ~,. 1 f 3 V Z , ~ ; .' ~ ~~1~ ~ ;` .~( ti i e ~z}} ~a~ ~,Vf ~ w'~~"t ~ fez 1 m ~ ~ Z /V/'J~ $ N ~ ~ ~ ~Ubgb r_ ka~~~ ~3^Ri Sryi__ ~ ~ ~ f ~ 7 $S ~ y~y v F y .. ~ ~ ~ O ~~;~ ~ ~ ~m a a~~ 9 9 ~~ ~i~rn -r r~. \ ` p,. ik ~ '1,` ;9 "' ~' / ~' ~r; %~ ~ ~i ro ' ~! ~ ~ / ..! ~ I y ~, 1~ ~. 1 i .o ,, , , ~`4,RTp ~',' .1. Vw,.,, t ,1, ..',;t +, .' ~ I ~ , ,, ~;, I ~,:.. ,,,~. I: i; ; ,;. .I ;~ ;r ., , .` I ~,~ <~ ~ i € r ~ < ~ j ; ~ 'C '. ~ ~.,. l ~ ~ ~- ~ 1 ' p~~ , ~?•r, r ~ ~ ~~-~A ~ - -o~ .~ cn .. ". q 1 1~ ~ t` it~._Q (1 r ~1 `1, !~ ~~-r~ I ~ ~ r +-.. ~ I:; ~ .. ~ p Sw 1 II~~Imi II a .w i~ ~: ~ti : ,, - N m. r ylt ~I rI~ ~ ,.,r- r.. L i ~~ .. rt~~_,rl ,rr~„~y~l,~,- , ~( °- .~, `~, _ ~ HI ~ i,, e ~ x,: I Y~ Y41 r ~~~1r~}Ilj ~~ y~ '~ _. ~. ._....~.. .._ •_4.. ~~_.._ ~. Y n I Exhibit B Sidewalk Plan .~ i!Y Y YiY Q RY v b-M q bpb pppp p-b pAAp t' r _.J pbtp ppbw 56~~63 6• p6 •b __" __" -~..i :aa=s - ___.._.._. abq.~ _..._ ~ ~ j ~ ~ w!: ~ ~~ a ~a . s ~e~ ° ~~ a ~ ~ ~ q(~ ""t 6 0 0 ~ ~ a ~ m A ° Q A a i a a ~ ~~~ Z ~~~~b e (Y Y Q a o ~. ~ a m Q ~~ 4~ ~ ~ ~ + r r ~r1 S ~ ) E ~/~ ..1 ~ ` 1i1 \ / ~ ~"1 ~ ...~ '•Ij ~ a. . 1 M~1~ 7 ro \ l*a ' l \ t I{ ~ I I' I tt 1 4 A ..., 1 1~ p.-- ! 111 `i`( d i r ~a~1 ~\~ V J 1' 4j {. ' ~a i ~ S'Ilu ~l~lljl 1`t~ {Ir'1 Y '~y'{++ 1~1 IF 1~1~~~\. f~11 5~~w~~~11~~\\hM ~irr ~' .1' '"'.. ''"P .t! !~ ~~n, I` 1 ~ 1 1• , =i 1 0., P . i/, 1 i `•C. `. n ! ~ ,,' i :r 3',,f F7 ~ x. , i ,. ~, I 1 `` Z ~ ~' '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` -' ~ x p .y-~q ~ r ~n'dsx~ ~+,' !C ~:Y~j / ~' ~u ^r`r, . 1 ,I I I ': Vt ~~"~\^~ ~~ y~~z ` I `r, : i ' !._. .,~~J ~ ~ `• Il ! ~, ~ \i`1:~~ rr -. r'''.1*~k~ i .. 9 I ,y. "` ->*.-e,- Fi ~~'kt 9// ni c 3, ~~ . e I ~ I`•' I`y `~ `..,V` ~. _' I ~° ~?`;~~ ~~St=.~ ~~ ~ rk-. ~ ~. ~a,~~~ \~'•d i~~ > 8 q~ / R / .. ~ ~ ~ /o z` 1-w=`~ Y!~'/~ r1 - %~.,•,' X2189 Y l ~' ~- \,.~ -~_ „ ""-'~~"°P'':l} `~\ ~ >RL ~ ~s ti. 7 x\, .> ~,.,.c~~ \ ~ ~ rl~\ Ir -.i . ~7'v~~~ ~r = ~ Y Fnl j ""34/97 9i `(,} + _~__-__'t ___y.~•>_ 1-•. ~ _~. \ 1 "'ti ~5 ~ ~° ~ ~~.`~ ~~~)~ ~ ') r)Y) ^*}' ly,. g~,,~ \ ,\\. ~ r r~Mrxc y,•r s / rt r s~ .'\ .. un 1MB/ yam, !/!Iw ~'Is / - -_ ,~ ., -.-! ..ll~~ ,1 ,~ r/1 S \;. `n,~~~\. 17i J1~! i ~:e~ ~- J\ } T ;d.'"ti~~"}1"'v~.__ ,,`. III t ; ~ - ~ • Q ~ 1 : if { O • ~ A I / ~- _ -_ ~ i -.t „_y,P_. ~ I} I S •- • ~• 1 ~a'b..~ I • ::r d ~~$ I I N _'~` 1 N 1 ' 1 I t i o. { 7 yy \ (y~ jj C +w~. r II ~~,' 1 it I 1 Uw>. i Ya j 1 I% t.-,y-. ,.. i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~(~ c N ~ f~, wn' 4~ ~ l ~`I ~; ~ ~ i I I ~ ~__ ~~ t111 fl Il I~ I1 I~ I~ I U I I j , u'`N ~ ;-ry ~ , , - ,1 - r---------- I f .. ~ Ij I~ I ------ ~ ~.___._.._.. ~ I a}_~ e I tIV N t" k I II ,-~t~,~ r------- I _~ i ~ , ~?',. °~` ''.max ,,ll. ~.~,;. _. ~'' I 1 I ~---------~-- j - `,',,;.~, s rte. j j , ,.. - , 1 ' }: 1 1 , f~ ~ I,i ,o-. ~~~ . I I ~~~ - ~~~ i I j 4i: I 1 1 ~ g 1 1 v ~ 1 ~~-~ r~Y. I ~I~II A ~~g I ,gq / t,~~'p ,l>~~Q,~.: uy,~~ \ , g J/ P t' ! r g ~ 1 ili)~' I 1 1~ ~~ ~ N .'! rlil it `~I, ,~`~.=`1 M. ii tl ?~' q 1, h` r e .i ., ~~ I 1 i ~` ~' iii ~ ,<r\,s' ~..4.!~~ ,i .y e .~l'~`~,l q. ~ i III I !: ~ ; ~5~@~\ {', 4 ,...:}. ft tl 7__ 4 ~\\D ~~1. I, I I ~ ~ fl-. ~ j~.; p r' ~\ ' 1r,. .1h1-~r.,`.>'aL ! 1~'' _ ~ !~ ~ ~ ~ !1 y lil ll., ~ I 7E _._.....~.:~ I _ 6Y~/ /r ~1 /7~~`ia'1~., 11~~11 .if'@ty i_... a ~z ..' •/i `. '=.•r~ ,.coq=%,,,.~:._ ~--.:'z.~ ~'!! 'I/' Il:. ~ U:~~j• W -~ ~ l I ) ! J ~ \ , ( ~}~ ~`~, , S. , ~ ,~ !(,ice ~/ 1 4 J,~ l `lrFl~ `j' ~' _.i •r ~_-_ r[a..~ ~~., j& f( ~~~i -~ ~~ iry ~~~'~I~ z \ 4~~`•~~~`~ ~~ ~~I~~ ~ ~ ~ i '~,1 .~ ~•y - ~~ `! n ~ '~-..a P >+ ~,[~{'6, ~ _ w !. ~`H~F,~+j~ It ~~ i ! ~ 1 ~~! >b. ~ ,t~ 1' -t c-~ ' 1 I t S,T ,-z- ~ , '~ c N r / i _ z h ,, 1 ~ ~ l~ ~:, `~ ~ t it rho ! k!'A n l ~ r ,. \~~ ~ ,. I i _ ~~~! r ~; IoQ ~N9/'y~' `v°t7h ~•~„ ~,+`J~\`-\` \,}~\}\ ~ , ~~, III , ~„ !. --- !I ~ I _ t ,}~~ p~pr ~ a g y ry- •vlq..~ ~j ~ I v 2'fy~ p~f~j ~~ b s . r~---•~\yy ~ r ...~ \ `, ` ~ ,: , ~ .I ~ VJ~!11 ._ ci~~~'( ~j~~['~ L`Tf ~!-~ ~ 1 C~ I~ ~~i, 5kil it ~,,i ~ f~1! ,' i.:/ry i¢~~~ ~ ~/~/~O~r J ~.~5 / 17.71 i ~ ~." to / u\ +,i ~~'I i Fa `F f~$ ~. '•u.,, ~'..((1 ~ ~i f'ed'~!I y ~~.g'_~~ I ~ ~ ~ { i l r ~ ~ty~ , r' '?k ~Z"~~M/~/ (! ~i. ry~W'!' ~~ ~ .T' t..~~~ 1~ ....y , t d ~ r^ f 1 . ~ r- ra ~ ~'n. ,isv c,~ ..~ , .i ' ~ ., .S F 1l v\' ~"v-..~ '~ 5 r 9 J 1. ,a t Yy l"~ .. "§' /~` ---gg i ... .;1 ~' 11! l.?'..:'~~1 ~ "'+_".A+ -: III ~ ._N-yF.,..._. r m ~~-~ '~fu J71 i ~, ~' 1 ~{ ~ Y .._ ~ ~ ,.., f"`_~~ J mi` q ~/ EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SECTION LEGEND, PLANS AND SECTIONS Exhibit C: Landscape Section and Plan Legend Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area B Interface Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b (Section): Rancho California RoadlSub Area A Interface Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section): Sub Area A Interface at East Exhibits C-4a (Plan) and C-4b {Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area B Interface Exhibits C-Sa (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area A Interface Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at East Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at South It should be noted that Implementation of the requirements contained on Exhibits C-1a (Plan), C-1b (Section), C-4a (Plan) and C- ob (Section) have been altered per Planning Application No. 08-0122 (Conditional Use Permit) and Planning Application No. PA08-0123 (Major Modification); however, the original intent of PDO-5 has not been modified with Amendment No. 1 to PDO-5 (PA08-0125). ' 35 Exhibit C Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibits C-1a (Plan) and C-1b (Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area B Interface RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. CONICAL DECIDUOUS BROAD CANOPY STREET TREE TYPICAL ~ DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND fi' CONCRETE SHRUB MASSING TYP. 1 SIDEWALK TYPICAL SHRUB MASSINGUTYPICAL~ ~ ~ SHRUB FMA SENG TYPICAL T 'I I '~ 1 UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL PYRAMIDAL EVI=RGREEN TREE TYPICAL RESTAURANT 1--~ PLAN VIEW Rancho California Road /Sub Area B Interface NTS Z Z 5 a c~ zz ~ I ~ III ~~II~- Z w ~ v W ~ f=1 I I- ~ I-i I I-I I I o Q~ ~, ~ J ~z a~ Z~ Z ~ ~ III-11f- ~ - - ~ Uw wN wt -n wa Ci- . ° ° ~ 111 111 1 ~ d o ~ o ~ ~ ~ U Y ae ,~ _ _ lll I lll a a~ U ~_ ~ Za ~ ~ lli lll Q ~ W z~ U o ~ = J~ a ~ = ~ ~0 1-III-III- ~ c UN ~V i NI /7 i0 to LIB-III-I Q M f-I 11=f I I- ~ m III=111-I 111 111.= 111 111 =111=111- ~ ~C I l=1 I 1=1 .n ~ to o, .n II1=iII~ ~ ,, ' 1111 II::~ ~ - ~~ , 1-111=11 N ~ ~ Z ad = 1 = ~ _ III I I I III L N I ~ ~ ; ~ ~~ I- = ~ - = III-III 1 ~ F - 1 11 1 l ii 1 ._ r ;~ ~. Z 1 1 1 1 V a ~ ~ 1-~,~.1=III a z II-111- Q o ~,~ III III I W ~ III III > V o ~ oc~ ~ N I-III-I ~ I W E ad _ ~, ~, ~~ ~ 1111 11- U) ~ z o m~ ~ 1=1 11=1 I III-IT- ~= 1=1 I 1=1 m o gN III-1 I I Exhibits C-2a (Plan) and C-2b {Section): Rancho California Road/Sub Area A Interface RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL BROAD CANOPY DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL PYRAMfDAi EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL SMALL (LOWERING ACCENT 6~ CONCRETE SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL SIDEWALK TYPICAL CONICAL DECIDUOUS STREET TREE TYPICAL ~ _ _ • Y \ t Y ~~ } x z 'i '.. i K' x x• ~~ A x~ % '. x _ OFFCCE MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. MINOR ENTRY MONUMENT PLAN VIEW Rancho California Road /Sub Area A interface NTS Exhibits C-3a (Plan) and C-3b (Section): Sub Area A Interface at East RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. BROAD CANOPY EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING iYP. PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE TYPICAL 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ N SINGLE FAMILY N ~-- RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ CONCRETE BLOCK PERIMETER WALL TYPICAL VINES ATTACHED TO WALL TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Rancho Calrfornia Road / Sub Area A In~erface NTS I 1-1 i i- I i 1=1 I I- 11=III=11. IIHII- IIII~III~I a ~ II-1I1=1I ° 111-111- , ~~ ~~ . I IITITI I I II ~ Ii aao I it l 11 l (I I IIT 11=III=III- r I~1-1~1-_I 03 11=I~~-ICI a~ ¢ ~ III-ICI-_I WW Q~ a ~ ~~ o ~- I I-I ~ I-I ~ 1- ~~ N a ~ Z~ ~~ ~~ J a I ~~-I ~ I-~ o W Z~ a~ ~z w C~ z ~ I I ~I l i=i N pw w - ¢w ¢ r w 2~ m~ o~ ~~ ~ w I I I I III I I I I II I I.i °a~ cwa~ aw ~ ~ ~ ~ I I-I I I-1 ~ I- ~> ~_ ~U W = III-III-1 .r m,•, 5N as ~~ - III~_'I I- a ~, W ~ ~ I )=1 I I I I III-1 ~ I-1~1=1~1~ ~- -- _ °.o I II I II I II I it I I~ .d y =III Illili,l' N ~ d II~ IfI-_ z0 IIIIIIIIIII II I II I it 1 1 o (jj j ~, II~ ~ I.II ~ ~~ fn (A Z IIIIIIII N> I I_I Exhibits C-4a (Plan) and C-4b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area B Interface RETAIL PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS 4 ACCENT TREE TYPICAL PYRAMIDAL EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL I BROW DITCH -~ . r BROAD CANOPY ~ ` .~ ' ~ EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL ~ SHRUB MASSINGUTYPICAL ~. MEDIUM FOREGROUND "' ~ ~ µ SHRUB MASSING TYP. ' . %7 f SMALL FLOWERING ACCENT I-r• ] Y 5' CONCRETE SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL SIDEWALK TYPICAL ~~ VINES ATTACHED 4 TO FENCE TYPICAL MULTI -1= AMI LY ~ a' TuautaR STEEL RESIDENTIAL FENCE TYPICAL PLAN `lIEW Sub Area C /Sub Area B Interface NTS N ~ J o> OU oa ~~ ~ --+ (~ Z w QJ (aj ~N pW p U_ ~ O~ a~ pd W ~m QW ~~ ~~ WS ~U ~Z Z Z ~ N Id\Q YN U W \ m~ o ~ O wm ~ > C9~ m w 2 ~~ N J Q p U W 2 U Q w Q U Z W Nj ~ W Z N U 7 ~ ga ~~ m,,, ~ U ~~ Q ~_ lil 3= U K ~ Cf10 i l ~l I I-1 11= Z J Q I I I-1~-1 I I a o Q a W ~ I I I=! I I.I I I~ W~ g ~ W I I I=1 I I-I ~ J - ~ I I I-III- ~- ~ ;m J ~ , i ~~ w o III II' ~~ ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N U a ° ' ~I ~ `~ `' ~ ,M+ C N ~ A W L Q ~ ` VJ 4 } N W O ~ a ~ ~Z Exhibits C-5a (Plan) and C-5b (Section): Sub Area C/Sub Area A Interface 1 1 1 BROAD CANOPY PARKING TWO STORY DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL O F i I C E LARGE BACKGROUND ~ 1 SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL I 1 RETAINING BROAD CANOPY WALL EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL PYRAMIDAL EVERGREEN r TREE TYPICAL - ~ ~ .. PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS ~ BROW DITCH ACCENT TREE TYPICAL - O O ~ MEDIUM FOREGROUND _ \ - SHRUB MASSING TYP. _% K 1 ' Y K; Y ~ ~ % T ~ 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPiCAI ~ VINES ATTACHED \ i0 FENCE TYPICAL s' CONCRETE ~ MULTI-FAMILY SIDEWALK TYPICAL ~ RESIDENTIAL PLAN VIEV~! Sub Area C /Sub Area A Interface iJTS ~I I I-f r W~ Z III=1 I I a ~ p ~ ~ ~, I-III-I _ III=III `~ ` `~ ~ ~ I-III=~ ?~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~~ III-1 I I o Q_ o~ _ CZ Q.w ~w W2 YN ~W mo ~N • IIII~ III. z -~ V ~ J _ a ~~ m~ ®IIIIIIIIII~ ¢rn ( - - ~i N -_~ U~ Y A - -1 I(-1 11-I W N w 4aa ~' Ili=! I I-1 I I l I !-1 I I=1 I I- ~ Z o I I=1 11=1 11=i v III-III-III- ~ III III-I i l-~ ~ mW 1=1~I-ICI ICI- a W !-III-i 11- ~ W c i-1 I i -III N ~ i i l-1 1I- Y IIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIII~' 1-1 I(=1 11=1 I ~- Q z. -I ~ 1-1 ~ 1-1 I I- .o `~; III-III-III-I I o I I-I 11-II I-I l I. m o 1=1.1 I-1 14=1.1(-' u'~ ''~ .~~ i I I=1LI-1 I I '~ ~, oQ ~6 i l 1=1 ~ 1=1 11= ~ > p ~ J ~, ~ °~ I I 1-III-I ! I ~ U~ Z W , J I I ~l I I-,L W ~, o W g III-I 11=1 I r_ ~~ ~~ Z <~ a I I 1-I 11=1 l i ~ Y `~ Gr `~ III-1~1-ICI 2Q J~ ~~ ~ ill-,III- °W ~~ as ~ ill,;,llr ;~° Exhibits C-6a (Plan) and C-6b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at East LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. - C_ UPRIGHT EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL 5' CONCRETE ' • .!.- SIDEWALK TYPICAL MULTI-FAMILY 6 RESIDENTIAL ~~ ,1 BROAD CANOPY '~ DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL BROAD CANOPY 1 EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL I ~ x ~ _ LAWN TYPICAL _ ~ ~ '~ 8' TUBULAR STEEL ~ ~ ~ FENCE TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Sub Area C Interface at East NTS ^~ I ..~. ~ I ~ :~ I SINGLE P~AMILY ~ RESID~'~1TIAL / d- \~~ D D 0 ~ . ~o~ c ~ ,a a w w w ~~ O~ W O U U 3 NU Uw ~ C~ a Z ~a' ~ °v Q zw U '.,. ~ O O w ~ ~' O[7 ~U mw w~ ~ z YN z ~ Q a0 LL pQ m~ ~~ 5~ ~ 0 . . a I z~ °a ~a ,.W ~~ ?~ O ~ ~''~ Vl ~ N O ~ Q U~ ~ ...i ~ ° O O ~ ~ ~ m -~ U ~ Q ~ m ~ h = 0 N ( /7 J wI a O J ~w N 1 ~!! } N W ~ ~~ Q' ~ W y~ ~ w W Z_ V in a ~_ ~U z O~ w ~~ y Z Exhibits C-7a (Plan) and C-7b (Section): Sub Area C Interface at South LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL BROAD CANOPY EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. - :117 - PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS ACCENT TREE TYPICAL r 5' CONCRETE I SIDEWALK TYPICAL MULTI-FAMIL RESIDENTIAL --, , ~ .. `~ J~ ~~` ~ ~ ~ -O __ x __,~_ _ ~ - --~-_~-_-~----~---X SINGLE FAMILY T~RE'E~TYPICp ERGREEN ~ RESIDENTIAL 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPICAL SMALL EVERGREEN 2 6 I SCREEN TREE TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Sub Area C Interface at South NTS 23 J W~ oca,~ ~~ oa a~ ~~ V. W Za z° °w o wN a~ 0 Z O ~ ~ U w b~ <~ as U ~ m ~ _ W F W °U ~W ~~ W w oc~ ``' z KZ J W ~N J W mQ~ N N °~ Wm l s 9 ~ . rI L.~ W ~ ~- °~ ~ J ~ NU w Q, = ~ S ( j Z < U = mW Z NW rZ w ~~ Z ~~ F ~' Illlllllllilll~ Wa J~ 111-1J-1 I ~ W z ~ I I-1 11-1 I f- ~ Y .t• I =11= l=~ °o P I I J-I 11-I i 1= a o 1 1-I ~ 1=1 I I-I 0 0_ _ I I I-1 11=1 I k ~ D - v _ _ Ddeo = ~" v a i=i i r. W ~illl~. ~ ~ t -1 I I- ~ `> I~ N OA _ /w/t~ •• RwJ~R,, W O ~ 0] ~ y... G? o ~ L. ~, r!,, U W W> Z ~ i F= <C U (~ z Exhibit D Conceptual Building Elevations .~; `r~-+~ I_ y ~ j; __ ~~~ f ___}~' s .~ a Q l ,, ~..,, ; ~kv```_^ -~ ~ _~. i I ___ _ _ _ A y%/ A r~q Y -~ i -~a w ~i ;A ~. :l i 2 4 Q ti K C ----! %~ .~ U` 2y _._ _~ L 'O m J o _-' {~ ~ ( I Q _ ~ ~ l W ~~ I~ = tli~ a 1 OZ l ~ Y 1~~' ~, ~ ~3 i; i i u -a ~6 to C ~ o „ ~~ p 2 ~; y ~, a= i` 0 h W a W -:- ..~ 0 aS' e- ~= hi 2 O om F 1 W 3 £ ~~~ ;'\uf~y'\~ 1 1'1 G.3~ e ift. V ~s J 5 w V ':'~ - r,~ ~, o ~ ~~ P ii .. i ~ 5i ~~. ~# { 2 r i c 2C t ~i ~ ~ m, ~ `9 iWa r a . ~ r y ~: ~ »H I 1 ~ ~ ~. ~ .: ~ r.~.. ' .C '-t N ~ kt ~ W Z ~ W 1 c W -,a - ,? ~ _- io; . 5 ~-o t-. 2... .. W"`. _r y O. ~ 5 r- _ l ~ ~, I!tii 3 m i t '~ W' ~: . < o $? ' ~ W,_ 2 ~. ' ~~.;d m , m. ' r "r_t. 1 ~l o- o ~, t` a _,o I F f 1 = i ,; W I ~ ~ - _ a' ~ ~. z ,. ~r V "uu +¢ r } 1~,.~ ~ ~' ~ ~. zz~ .. ~ k., '~ 3 33C i ~ S ,, ~Q i ~ 2 ..,.~ ~ a a_ y ~ ~ _~l I~~ ~ k ~~Z' ~ ~ ~ ~' .~ , l V ~~ } Exhibit E Color and Material Board I.1cL N r '.rn r m" ~' , n _c r-r1 D ~ ~, Z ~~~ss _ f~ m~ ~~A~o /v s yo oR~~ o ~°,. m ~s ~ s~ P ~OIpO VPUf OUi }~ inNn FFpp Dr ~°i°gCS~nn N s~.HO ~ q q OOr~ O yLm A]py A~~ NN O 22 n -10 a ~ ' ~~ y ~ a i e a, ' C p ~ fil C ~ 3' m W N V, •q pq°^Y > . tfS~"8o°>3. ~; r ~ . " 0 Y r -:.c;x".~y~; n. ,e°~"!g~S~~' ~ ~• ~ . .Q } N m D .... i c ,~~ , ~ l0 - nl ; ~Y ~ 1u -V p;0 ~ E m:~ ~~. . v_..::~._~ _..._. .. ... - w A N m v ~D ~,'r j , •`% iO, STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Design Consulting Development Construction May 29, 2008 ,~~ ~ ~ ~ tJ City of Temecula ~~ MAY 3 0 2008 43200 Business Park Dr. L Temecula, Ca. 92589 sy To Whom It May Concern: RE: Statement of Operations Rancho California & Cosmic-Major Modification-Section I I. Hours and days of operations: Monday -Sunday. 7:00 AM to midnight. 2. Number of employees: 21 employees in total (50% full time/50% part time); There are no scheduled shifts. Fresh & Easy Neighborhood Market will coordinate times that work well for both employees and the market. 3. Number of required parking: Per city code the required minimum number of parking stalls is 47 spaces for the Fresh and Easy Neighborhood Market. The total number of required space for the center is 84 spaces. The total number of spaces provided in the center is 91. 4. Average daily peak trips generated: The average number of daily peak trips generated is 40 per 1,000 square feet. S. Type of equipment or processes used: The proposed Fresh and Easy Neighborhood market will use automated and manual check stands, refrigerator cases, electric fork lifts, cardboard bailer, and evaporative condensers. Normal grocery processes and procedures will be used to maximize the efficiency of the store while minimizing the impact to the environment and neighborhood. 6. Description of hazazdous materials (existing and new): There are no known existing hazardous materials on the site. As a neighborhood market, only normal cleaning agents will be used beyond the self contained Freon in the refrigeration systems. All refrigeration systems used will conform to all safety guidelines and standards. 7. Other descriptions that effectively describe the proposed use: Neighborhood Grocery 13745 Seminole Dr., Chino, CA 91701 4300 Edison Ave., Chino, CA 91701-541 q 909.548.4061, Fax: 909.548.4271 909.S48.S425, Fax: 909.627.5425 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing Case No: Applicant:. Location: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Planning Application Nos. PA08-0122, PA08-0123, and PA08-0125 Ron May; The Bergman Group South side of Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road, west of Cosmic Drive Planning Application Numbers PA08-0122, PA08-0123, and PA08-0125, a Conditional Use Permit, Major Modification, and PDO Amendment to PDO-5 for Temecula Village to allow the construction of a 13,969 square foot Fresh & Easy Market with alcohol sales and 5,800 square foot Pad C retail shops In accordancewith the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162) Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590 October 15, 2008 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.