HomeMy WebLinkAbout080608 PC Minutes iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillilillillilI
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 6, 2008
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on
Wednesday, August 6, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Harter led the audience in the Flag salute
ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio
Absent: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None at this time.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of June 18, 2008
1.2 Approve the Minutes of July 9, 2008
1.3 Approve the Minutes of July 16, 2008
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Chiniaeff who abstained on Item No. 1.2 and Commissioners Carey and
Chiniaeff who both abstained on Item No. 1.3.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Appoint one Commissioner to work with staff on creating a Sustainability Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Appoint Planning Commissioner Guerriero to work with staff on the Sustainability
Plan.
RAMinutesPC1080608 1
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to appoint Commissioner Guerriero to work with staff
on the Sustainability Plan. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to address the agenda out of order.
6 Planning Application Numbers PA08-0008 and PA08-0083 a Commercial Development
Plan to construct a 64,000 square foot four-story mixed use building and associated Sign
Program. Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters. Case Planners
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Continue to August 20, 2008 Planning Commission hearing at the request of the
applicant.
Per the request of staff, Item No. 6 will be continued to August 20, 2008, Planning Commission
meeting.
4 Planning Application Number PA07-0216, a Wireless Antenna Facility application for a
proposed 70'-5" high Verizon Wireless Telecommunications facility incorporated into an
existing self-storage facility
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-37
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0216, A
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION CONSISTING
OF TELECOMMUNICATION ANTENNAS MOUNTED TO A 70' 5" HIGH FAUX
LIGHT POLE AND GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN
AN EXISTING SELF-STORAGE FACILITY LOCATED AT 31524 RANCHO
PUEBLO ROAD (APN 959-070-024)
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Case Planner Jones highlighted the main components of
staff's report as follows:
• Project Description
• Location
• Site Plan
• Elevations
• Coverage
• After Coverage
• Environmental Determination
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
RAMinutesPC\080608 2
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Mr. Jones advised that it would be his opinion
that the difference in diameter between the existing light poles and new proposed light poles
would be 8 inches; advised that because of the added weight of the antennas the diameter was
increased; and that the light poles would be placed on the storage property made to resemble
athletic field light poles of the adjacent property.
Mr. Cary Warren, representing Verizon Wireless, noted that the future hospital will not have an
affect of the Verizon Wireless coverage.
At this time the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
5 Planning Application Number PA08-0133. A Development Plan for the construction of a
18.836 square foot, two-story office building
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-38
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA08-0133, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY 18,836
SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON A 1.06 ACRE LOT WITHIN THE
PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) ZONE, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA ROAD, AT
43980 MARGARITA ROAD (APN 959-050-014)
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Case Planner Lowrey highlighted the main components of
staff's report, such as follows:
• Project Description
• Location
• Site Plan
• Landscaping
• Adjacent Office Architecture
• Environmental Determination
• Parking
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Case Planner Lowrey noted that the first two
stories will be offices and that the third floor will be a mechanical room; advising that parking will
be sufficient and that there is a reciprocal parking agreement between the two adjacent lots and
the subject site.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Josh Sigler, representing Axis 3 Architecture, relayed that the difference between the pad
level of the proposed project and adjacent homes would be 10 to 15 feet; and air conditioning
R:wlinutesPC\080608 3
units would be located on the roof which will be disguised; advising that solar power will be
used.
Case Planner Lowrey added at the setbacks would be 25 feet from both DePortola Road and
from Margarita Road.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Case Planner Lowrey noted that she has not had any
correspondence from adjacent residents.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Chiniaeff spoke highly of the aesthetics of the proposed project but did express
some concern with the massiveness of the project compared to the adjacent businesses.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
3 CONTINUED FROM JULY 16. 2008 MEETING: Planning Application Number PA07-
0340, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to authorize a video game arcade and party facility
within an existing 20.000 square foot building, Katie Le Comte. Case Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION 08-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PA07-0340, A
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AUTHORIZING A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT
VIDEO GAME ARCADE AND PARTY FACILITY WITHIN AN EXISTING
COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 27468 YNEZ ROAD (APN 921-320-058)
Due to a conflict of interest, Commissioner Harter excused himself from the dais.
By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Case Planner Le Comte, highlighted the main components
of staff's report, to be as follows:
• Project Description
• Location
• Background
• Floor Plan
• COA
• Analysis
• Environmental Determination
In response to Commissioner Carey's query, Case Planner Le Comte noted that the applicant
will be required to comply with the Police Department's Statement of Operation.
RAMinutesPC\080608 4
Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that the application before the Commission would be a
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and that if problems arise, staff would seek a remedy.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that it would be the
Planning Commission's purview to add a condition that would not allow the applicant to sell
alcoholic beverages, but that the applicant would have the right to seek an amendment to this in
the future.
Referencing Chairman Telesio's concern with Condition of Approval PL-25, Case Planner Le
Comte advised that the language could be revised from supervised by an adult to supervised by
a legal guardian.
Chairman Telesio noted that it would be his opinion that Conditions of Approval Nos. PD-30,
PD-31 and PD-34 were not conditions but rather advisory notices.
At this time, the public hearing was opened.
Mr. Michel Knight, applicant, stated that in response to the concerns and queries of the Planning
Commission, the following was offered:
• That he would be in agreement with all Conditions of Approval
• That he would not have any intention of providing alcoholic beverages
• That every 3 months or so arcade games are switched with another facility
• That all children's games are grouped together and will be monitored
• That there will not be someone monitoring the live streaming 24/7
• That an alarm will be posted on the back door
• That no food service will be sold in the facility
• That No alcoholic beverages will be allowed and signs will be posted throughout the
facility
• That vending machines for candy and sodas will be available
• That video cameras are recording at all times and are kept for 30 days
• That there will be two managers the age of 21 and up
• That managers will be trained accordingly
• That there will be a staff of 14 security guards that rotate between facilities
• That he would be willing to close at 10 p.m. on the weekends
• That he has one other arcade facility in operation
• That the biggest problem he would have with his current facility would be patrons not
paying their tabs
• That the ages of the security guards would range from early twenties to mid thirties
• That security will ensure that alcohol is not be permitted on the premises
• That he does not know who owns the bins in the back of the building
Mr. Denny Myle, Temecula, relayed his concern with the war type games being available,
advising that kids will be negatively affected by the violent games and would request that the
violent and "R" rated games not be allowed.
Offering information with respect to Mr. Knight's business tactics, Mr. Bryce Ebeling, Menifee,
requested that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request.
Mr. Knight defended the negative comments made by the two speakers.
kNinutesM080608 5
1111IM11111111
At this time, the public hearing was closed and then reopened.
Noting that Mr. Knight has the purview to submit an application to open a business in Temecula,
Chief Williams relayed that he does have grave concerns with this type of business and the
impacts that will be associated with it; but informed that the Police Department will be prepared
to respond to any problems.
Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed the importance of video surveillance cameras being monitored
during business hours.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern with the time of closing, Chief Williams noted
that he would not anticipate any problems with the arcade closing at 11:00 p.m. as proposed;
but, because of expected concerns, the Police Department will be monitoring the establishment
closely.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that perhaps a Condition of Approval can be imposed that
would require the establishment to close at 10:00 p.m. for one year.
Commenting on Commissioner Guerriero's concern with respect to gangs and the rear of the
building, Chief Williams advised that this type of establishment will inevitably attract gang
members; noting that he would anticipate that the back of the establishment will become a
problem.
At this time, the public hearing was closed.
Understanding that Mr. Knight deserves the right to open a business in Temecula,
Commissioner Guerriero stated that this proposal, if approved, will be closely monitored to
ensure that no problems arise with respect to gang members loitering in the rear of the
establishment; and stated that he would be hopeful that that the applicant will abide by all
Conditions of Approval.
Relaying his view of the proposed project, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that under the CUP
process, the Planning Commission has the responsibility of evaluating the types of businesses
that come to the City of Temecula; stated that this type of use at this location has a great
potential to create a problem for the community (gangs) that he would not be desirous of
creating; that he would be of the opinion that the curfew will cause a problem with this project
and would be desirous of having the establishment close at 10:00 p.m. which may limit potential
problems that may arise; that he spoke with the adjacent tenants and was advised of the
problems the site encountered when it operated as a haunted house; and that he would be of
the opinion that the Condition of Approval relating to the amount of security officers based upon
the crowd would be a conflict in and of itself.
Also understanding that Mr. Knight has the purview to open a business in Temecula,
Commissioner Carey expressed his concern with the type of business and its location, and the
type of crowd that will be drawn to the business; and would be desirous of implementing more
restrictions i.e. time of closing.
Concurring with the Conditions of Approval, Chairperson Telesio relayed his willingness to give
the applicant an opportunity to run a decent business; noted that any slight problem will be dealt
with by the Police Department; noting for the record that the conditions are not simply
R:\MinutesPC\080608 6
Conditions of Approval but Conditions of Operation; that if approved, all conditions must be
satisfied or the applicant will need to return to the Planning Commission.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that staff will add a Condition of Approval that imposes that
if the applicant wishes to incorporate alcoholic beverages in the facility, it would require
Planning Commission approval; and that children under the age of 10 must be accompanied by
a parent, guardian and/or adult person having custody of the child.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation subject to
Conditions of Approval as well as the conditions imposed by Planning Director Ubnoske.
Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion with Commissioner's Carey and Chiniaeff who
voted No.
Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that because the vote resulted in one abstention, two
yeses, and two no's, this would be considered a non-approval; that the Planning Commission
would have the option to consider this item terminated or the Planning Commission could
establish some negotiations in order to reach an approval.
Noting that this applicant has an opportunity to run a decent business, Commissioner Guerriero
stated that if the applicant abides by all the Conditions of Approval, he would not see why the
applicant cannot be given an opportunity to run a business in a proper fashion.
Taking a strong position, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that he would be of the opinion that this
type of use, at this location will adversely affect the community in a negative manner and would
not be in favor of its approval.
For the Planning Commission, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that it would be important
that the Commission understand that a finding that the proposed project will or will not have an
adverse affect on the general welfare of the community, must be determined.
Commissioner Carey queried if there was a possibility of creating a system that would evaluate
the facility, ensuring that it's running in full compliance.
For Commissioner Carey, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that if the applicant violates the
Conditions of Approval, then the item can be brought back to the Planning Commission for
review.
Chairperson Telesio noted that it would not be feasible for staff to check on the operation on a
daily basis; stated that this facility will be complaint driven, and that if complaints are made,
Code Enforcement will respond; and that if a Condition of Approval is broken, the item can be
returned to the Planning Commission for review.
Commissioner Carey noted that he would feel more comfortable approving the project if the
closing time was changed from 11:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and that if complaints arise from
adjacent uses, that Code Enforcement will immediately respond; advising that monitoring of the
facility will be strictly enforced.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that it would be his opinion that the proposed project would be a
detrimental impact to the heath, safety, and general welfare of the community; and noted that
the amount of vacant spaces in the shopping center may become a target for blight, targeted by
the proposed use.
RAMinutesPC\080608 7
Commissioner Guerriero requested continual monitoring of all surveillance cameras.
For the Planning Commission, Case Planner Le Comte advised that there will not be continual
monitoring of the cameras but a condition can be imposed if this was the desire of the Planning
Commission.
Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that language can be added to state that in addition to the
security required by PD-16, that an individual be trained to monitor all surveillance cameras
inside and outside and to contact police if and when necessary.
Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that a condition that imposes that all cameras shall be
continually monitored; that the business close at 10:00 p.m.; noting that applicant would have the
ability to return to the Planning Commission at a later point in time to request an amendment to
the condition; and that if the Commission is of the opinion that a sufficient amount of time has
passed without any issues, the Planning Commission can support the request.
For the Commission, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that it would be the purview of the
Planning Commission if the item is to be continued to craft the language or can be crafted at this
time.
Chairperson Telesio relayed that in order to not prolong this application it would be his desire to
craft the language at this time, noting that it would be his opinion that the applicant should be
allowed to close at 11:00 p.m. as proposed.
Noting that because the application would be a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Director of
Planning Ubnoske stated that if any point in time there is a violation of a Condition of Approval,
staff would have the ability to revoke the permit.
Chairperson Telesio would be willing to approve the project and tighten the conditions as much
as possible which would allow the applicant an opportunity to run a solid business
establishment.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that it would be his opinion that in order to prevent a problem
with respect to curfew, the closing time should be 10:00 p.m.
Commissioner Guerriero along with Chairperson Telesio relayed that they would be willing to
change the closing time to 10:00 p.m.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation adding a condition
that would impose that the facility close at 10:00 p.m. versus the proposed 11:00 p.m.; that
Condition of Approval PD-18 impose that all cameras specified in PD-18 shall be monitored at
all times during which the use is open to the public by a security officer who shall be an addition
to the security guards required by PD-16, who shall be authorized or required to summon the
Police Department upon observing unlawful or disruptive activity. Commissioner Carey
seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner
Harter who abstained and Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted No.
Assistant City Attorney Curley advised that staff will amend the Conditions of Approval to reflect
all imposed changes ensuring that the applicant is aware of the changes to conditions and is
aware that he would have the right to appeal to the City Council regarding the changes to the
newly imposed requirements.
RAMinutesM080608 8
COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the aesthetics of the senior development on
the corner of Margarita Road and Deportola Road.
In response to Commissioner Chiniaeff's concern with respect to the senior development on
Margarita and De Potola Roads, Director of Planning Ubnoske advised that that developer has
defaulted on its construction loan.
Director of Planning advised that she will have Code Enforcement Deputy Director Johnston
provide a status report to the Commission with respect to the abandoned homes in Temecula.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No reports at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:40 pm, Chairman Telesio formally adjourned to August 20. 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the City
Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
John Tele o Debbie Ubnoske
Chairman Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPC\080608 9