Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
110508 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE NOVEMBER 5, 2008 - 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 2008-47 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Harter Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Proposed general vacation of the alley between Second and Third Street and between Old Town Front Street to the Murrieta Creek Channel, Dan York RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adoption a resolution entitled: 1 PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED VACATION OF THE EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREET AND BETWEEN OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Planning Application PA08-0192, a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity, as required by the Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control, to authorize a Type-20, Off- Sale Beer and Wine ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) license for a wholesale gift basket manufacturer and distributor, located within the Light Industrial (LI) zone, located at 26090 Ynez Road, Betsy Lowrey RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Findings for a Public Convenience or Necessity PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Long Range Planning Application No. LR08-0045, a Development Code Amendment to define full service hotels, revise the intensity bonus justification requirements for full service hotels whose intensity of development exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio allowed in the zone, add new parking standards for full service hotels, and add a provision to allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel, Katie Innes RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE FULL SERVICE HOTELS, REVISE THE 2 INTENSITY BONUS JUSTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS WHOSE INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE TARGET FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED IN THE ZONE, ADD NEW PARKING STANDARDS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS, AND ADD A PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHEN VALET SERVICE IS PROVIDED AT A FULL SERVICE HOTEL" 4 Planning Application No. PA08-0162, a Ma or Modification to modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant, Five 'N Diner (approved Development Plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union, generally located on the east side of Ynez Road approximately 500 feet south of Winchester Road at 26460 Ynez Road, Betsy Lowrey RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0162, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO MODIFY ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT, FIVE'N DINER (APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PA99-0476) TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS A BANK, ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD APPROXIMATELY 500 FEE SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT 26460 YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-320-037) 5 Planning Application No. PA08-0153, a Maior Modification to construct a 6.532 square foot two-story expansion of an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center for Grace Presbyterian Church generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road, Betsy Lowrey RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0153, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO MODIFY AN EXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALLIWORSHIP CENTER ORIGINALLY ENTITLED TO CONSTRUCT A ONE- STORY 2,600 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO BE A TWO-STORY 6,532 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION (A TOTAL INCREASE OF 3,932 SQUARE FEET), GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE MEDUSA AT 31143 NICOLAS ROAD (APN 957-140-010) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM PLANNING DIRECTOR 3 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 6:00 P.M. City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The entire agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at cityoftemecula.org. 4 i ITEM 1 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2008 PREPARED BY: Chris White, Project Engineer PROJECT Alley Vacation Related to Planning Application No. PA08-0115 SUMMARY: CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15061(b) and Section 15305 RECOMMENDATION: Determine General Plan Conformity for the Alley Vacation BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 20, 2008, the Planning Commission approved PA08-0115, the Warehouse at Creekside, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct a 30,519 square foot mixed use project. The building footprint encroaches six feet into the existing alley at the rear of the property. In order to accommodate this design, the City will need to approve a general vacation, for the public utility easement. The location of the utility easement is between Second and Third Street and between Old Town Front Street and the Murrieta Creek Channel. There are five properties that will be affected by the public utility easement vacation: APNs 922-046-010, 922-046-011, 922-046-012, 922-046- 025 and 922-046-028. The Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. 79-68 in April 10,1979. In this resolution it abandoned certain alleys in the City of Temecula per the Sections of 959 and 2381 of the Streets and Highway Code, but did not vacate the existing public utility easement. ANALYSIS Pursuant to Street and Highways Code Section 8310 et seq., the City may vacate its interest in the public utility easement if the City finds that such vacation conforms to the General Plan and that the subject utility easement is no longer necessary for present or prospective public use. The hearing before the Planning Commission only concerns the first of those findings regarding conformity with the General Plan. The Warehouse at Creekside development was determined to be consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Tourist Retail Core designation in the Old Town Specific Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, professional office, and service- oriented businesses, as typical uses in the Community Commercial designation. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Map Vacation Exhibit C - Resolution No. 79-68 2 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED VACATION OF THE EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREET AND BETWEEN OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PAN OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 20, 2008 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0115, a Development Plan for the Warehouse at Creekside, a 30,519 square foot mixed use project including 32 (19 low income and 13 moderate income) residential apartment units and a 3,400 square foot restaurant and a Conditional Use Permit required for the residential use. B. The Development Plan requires a vacation of the Public Utility Easement along the rear property line of the subject property between Second and Third Street, to facilitate the construction of the approved building. C. The City proposes to vacate the Public Utility Easement between Second and Third Street from Old Town Front Street to Murrieta Creek, the entire alley. D. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65402 and Section 8133 of the Street and Highways Code, the Planning Commission held a hearing regarding the conformity of the proposed vacation to the General Plan. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the proposed vacation on November 5, 2008. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission made the following findings; Vacating the Public Utility Easement between Second and Third Street and between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek does not result in any inconsistencies with the General Plan. The public utility easement is not required for any future public utilities and is not identified on the City's Circulation Element. The Warehouse at Creekside development was determined to be consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan and the Tourist Retail Core designation in the Old Town Specific Plan. The General Plan has listed the proposed uses, including retail, professional office, and service-oriented businesses, as typical uses in the Community Commercial designation. Section 2. Further Findings. After receiving evidence, both written and oral, regarding the proposed conditional vacation of the public utility easement between Second and Third Street and between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek Channel described in Exhibits "A" through "C" hereto, including the staff report regarding the proposed conditional vacation, the Planning Commission hereby finds in accordance with Government Code Section 65402 that the conditional vacation of the public utility easement described in Exhibits "A" through "C" is in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Temecula based on the findings set forth above in Section 1 of this Resolution and for the reasons set forth in the staff report, which is incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of November 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of November 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT A- LEGAL DESCRIPTION VACATION F BEING A STRIP OF LAND AS SHOWN ON BLOCK 29, OF THE TOWN SITE OF TEMECULA MAP, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MAP RECORDED IN SOOK15, PAGE 726, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGINNING AT THE MOST WESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 AS SHOWN ON SAID BLOCK 29, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RIVER STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, NORTH 44°29'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 285.00 FEET TO A POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FRONT STREET AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE NORTH 45029'25" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE, SOUTH 44°29'59" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 285.00 FEET, TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF LOT 22 OF SAID MAP, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID RIVER STREET; THENCE SOUTH 45°29'20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PORTION OF LAND CONTAINS 0.13 ACRES. MORE OR LESS AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "B"ATTACHED HERETO MADE A PART HERE OF. THIS DESCRIPTION WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION. p LAND s~ R v G IF DARRIN P. GINN No. 7075 Exp. 1261/08 sir R~~P F OF CAt Damn R Ginn, L 77075 Date EXP. 12/31/08 Prepared for and on behalf of HLC Pa e1ofI EXHIBIT B MAP VACATION EXHIBIT B - MAP VACATION ys y~°Fs P _ i FRONT SMET sf SITE N45.22~00 ° VICINITY MAP 1------- NTS I i 1k -p -c~ I I S~9C ~ ~ 1y p pp ~ I F W 30'r ---~6--~ ~i -----1 f~IW -----N N 30 O oLr) L GQ. I w N (0 l No t'r p k p NI L rL0 C~` 0~•- - -'V d- 'a' L - I 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L- - -J S45 2925"~ 20.00 p u~ N - _ AKA STREET O _ ±5,700 F W5225 "W 0.13± AC p LAND v DARRIN R GINN No. 7075 _ (l~~- Zlg * Exp. 12/31/08 DARRIN P. GINN, LS 7075 DATE PREPARED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF HLC ~9TF OF CAU1 SHEET 1 OF 1 1 3 EXHIBIT C RESOLUTION NO. 79-68 a T I Board of Supervisors County of Riverside B 3 RESOLUTION NO. 79-68 M 4 ABANDONKENT OF UNNAMED ALLEYS (R-854) C, 6 (First Supervieorial District) , 6 Wvoevnc, a public hearin; miter due notice has been held 7I upon a resolution of intention to abandon the hereinafter described 8 unnamed alleys, and all persons having had an opportunity to be 9 heard, and the Board having determined, pursuant to Sections 959 10 and 2381 of the Streets and Highways Code, that the unnamed alleys 111 are unnecessary for present or prospective public use, including , ~ I 12 bikeways;.now, therefore, ! 13 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County 14I of Riverside, State of California, in regular session assembled on 161 April 10, L979; that the unnamed alleys in the Temecula. area, 16 First Supervisorial district, more particularly described in ; { 17 Exhibit A, attached hereto and by this reference made a part 18 hereof, are hereby abandoned. > 3,9 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board 20 cause a'certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the 21 Office of the Recorder of Riverside County, California. C_ . a, 22 Roll Cali resulted as follows: AYESs Schroeder, Record, McCandless and Abraham. 23 NONSt Drone. 241 Absents. Younglove. (z;: I.. 25 t 26 GJG:bw 27 3-7-79 28 IM lon9drq 1, OMR#d to N • nw aipy .1 . JAM6a H.A"WLL ww duly PW by MW ese,a of 6- Wi a Ns d.M tn,,,a. at -toitA e~ u DONI~D S 'YAN pMl,ei rM bwY ~ j ' A t LEGAL DESCRIPTION m Abandonment of Unnamed Alleys - R-854 In the county of Riverside, State of California, _ described as follows, All alleys (2o-foot wide) within Blocks 4, 5, 6, 23, • 24, 25, 27, 28 and 29, as shown on Town of Temecula on file in Book 15, Page 726 of Naps, Records of San Diego County, California. k: Reserving and excepting frog the'abandorment an easement and'right to construct, maintain, operate, replace, . t` faaciliteand 's,rincluding public star% drains andapappurtenant service structures, pursuant to Section 959.1 of the Streets and' Highways Code. ~t f t; SI h `t j Y[ . v:Y:1N..v`M~Wlsf ' i I I i I i I I ITEM 2 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2008 PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Case Planner APPLICANT NAME: Stringer's LLC PROJECT Planning Application Number PA08-0192, a Finding of Public SUMMARY: Convenience or Necessity, as required by the Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control, to authorize a Type-20, Off-Sale Beer and Wine ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) license for Stringer's, LLC, a wholesale gift basket manufacturer and distributor located within the Light Industrial (LI) zone, generally located on the east side of Ynez approximately 700 feet south of Equity Drive, at 26090 Ynez Road BACKGROUND SUMMARY On September 3, 2008, Stringer's Gift Baskets, LLC ("Stinger's"), a wholesale gift basket manufacturer/distributor, submitted an application requesting that the City of Temecula Planning Commission make a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity to authorize a Type 20 license (off-sale beer and wine), as required by the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). Approval of a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity will permit Stringer's to include wine bottles within their gift baskets for distribution at 26090 Ynez Road. Stringer's is a wholesale gift basket manufacturer and distributor located within a 102,619 square foot warehouse (including 21,000 square feet of office space), distributing baskets throughout the United States for retailers including Wal-Mart, Costco and Target. Their operations include five assembly lines, 80 feet of conveyer belts, a shrink tunnel and an automatic case sealer. Stringer's does not sell directly to the public. A detailed Statement of Operations is attached. In order for the Stringer's to include wine in any of their gift baskets, the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) requires that Stringer's maintain a Type 14 (Public Warehouse) and Type 17 (Beer and Wine Wholesaler) license. In addition, the ABC requires a Type 20 (off-sale beer and wine) since wine is distributed for consumption offsite. Stringer's currently possesses these ABC licenses at facilities located at 42210 Zevo Drive; however, the company moved its operations to 26090 Ynez Road, which is within a new Census Tract determined by the ABC to be "over-concentrated" for off-sale licenses (Type 20). For this reason, Public Convenience or Necessity findings are required for the required Type 20 license. Upon approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity, the existing ABC licenses for Stringers at 42210 Zevo Drive will become void upon being transferred to the new location at 26090 Ynez Road. i ANALYSIS Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.030, assembling, distributing, packaging, and wholesaling is a permitted use in the Light Industrial (LI) Zone. The applicant includes wine bottles in some of their overall gift baskets. No direct alcohol sales to the public are a part of the business operations. A Conditional Use Permit is not required, nor is the determination that this project is required to be at least 500 feet away from sensitive uses. However, in order for the Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity to be made, the proposed use must be compatible with the surrounding land uses and not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. Staff has determined that the operation of Stringer's, which include assembling and distributing high volumes of gift baskets to be shipped throughout the United States, is a unique business within the community and would not result in an excessive number of similar establishments in close proximity. Furthermore, a warehouse that distributes gift baskets in bulk that may include bottles of wine, at times, is a compatible and consistent land use when compared to the other warehouse and light industrial uses in the surrounding area. As provided by the State of California Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control, the project is located within Census Tract 0432.10 and is considered over-concentrated since three off-sale (Type 20 or 21) licenses are allowed and seven exist within this Census Tract. These seven existing licenses are for off-sale Type 20 or 21 permits and include convenience or grocery stores selling beer, wine or distilled spirits directly to consumers. Stringer's is a unique wholesale operation which caters to a different clientele than those existing businesses with licenses in the subject Census Tract. Therefore, staff has determined that an eighth license in the Census Tract for an off-sale Type 20 license at this light industrial facility would not result in an excessive number of similar establishments and recommends that the Planning Commission approve the Findings for a Public Convenience or Necessity. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Site Plan Statement of Operations Letter of Justification ABC License Status for Stringers LLC Census Tract Information 2 VICINITY MAP ~o~~ ~0~0 °5 ~ y9 vP v ? m T'P ° ciyo 9~ cq~ o~~ ' "ail ~yoy oo~o ~9~o e 9L 9L ~F~ d~ sq~o?• ~`r ~ 's 9 PG o y oy{y y ,j,P ,~o y e S1 Ir g hQ Project Site y0 / c '•p, 0~Q-'1 oy G,t,~ i~ F NICL'N O ~oc9 ?`O~ oo S0~ 14 4~~~ moo 0t y o`' 00 ~yo FrcT SITE PLAN A P p l e A ~A o ~ d p ^o P ~ z z pp E ! E`E a`Ja F e Q Q U~ ~ 4 p5!• P'8 ~b d 100 t; 0 0000 0 B ®006 z 1~,,. - _d,'r; -.f. ♦ ~ y` e _ III". l~ LS;I u 1 'i fill a='' t t 1 ► Ci w ~fi it S ~ F ~ ~ e L~~= ~1~I~sra~Ma STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillililillillillillillillillillilillillilillillilI III I T R, R' 1G ]E ]EZ15 CUSTOM GIFT BASKETS & PACKAGING Statement of Operations Stringer's is a wholesale gift basket manufacturer for grocery chains and internet based companies across the United States. We have been in business for 8 years and in the City of Temecula the last 3 years. We were previously located on Zevo Dr. off Diaz Rd. and Winchester. Stringer's hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. We currently employ 20 full time people from the local area and during holiday season, we hire an additional 75-80 full time temporary people from the local area. Although one of the licenses Stringer's is applying for is a type 20 Off- Sale Beer and Wine, we are still focusing our growth on the wholesale business. We are not directly retailing any alcohol, beer or wine to consumers. The Type 20 will be a great asset to our company as it will help secure our existing contracts by enabling us to be diverse and offer benefits other gift basket manufacturers can't. Stringer's has 105 parking spaces and 4 handicapped spaces. The building at 26090 Ynez Rd. is 102,619 square feet with 21,000 square feet being used for office. Because we are a wholesaler, we have very little foot traffic. The type of equipment used to assemble our gift baskets are, 5 assembly lines consisting of 80 feet of conveyer, a shrink tunnel, and an automatic case sealer. We also us a fork lift to move pallets of finished goods and for loading and unloading trucks. Stinger's does not use any hazardous materials in the production of our gift baskets. Stringer's wants to promote the wines of Temecula Valley along with other California wines across the United States. We see a great opportunity to offer gift baskets containing local wines to local developers and other professional businesses. Again we only want to use wines in gift baskets. This is our business. Stringer's security plan is to house wine in a locked, temperature controlled room, with only key management personnel having access. Wine orders will only be made for one week's production, to keep inventory levels down. The approximate percentage of store products devoted to alcohol will be under 5%. Stringer's does not sell directly to the public. We are a wholesale manufacturer and act as a distributor for companies such as Wa1Mart.com, Costco.com and Target.com. STREET: 26090 YNEZ ROAD TEMECULA, CA 92591 TEL: (951) 719-1356 FAX: (951) 719-1358 LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION S -T R, 11-N-G-EKS llJ CUSTOM GIFT BASKETS & PACKAGING Letter of Justification Stringer's LLC, is a unique business to Temecula Valley. We are a wholesale gift basket manufacture for the grocery chains and internet based companies across the United States. Some of our clients include Costco, Safeway, Proflowers.com, Sam's Club and Walmart.com. At this time Stringer's does not cater to an under-served population except when it comes to its employees. Stringer's prefers to hire its full time and seasonal employees from within the city limits. Most of Stringer's seasonal employees are mother's wanting to earn extra Christmas money for their children. Stringer's is a large gift basket manufacturer, and when doing our research for this public convenience and necessity letter, we could not find another company in the Temecula Valley that is comparable to our business model. Stringer's is located on the East side of the 15 freeway. We are located in the light industrial area of Temecula. There are no other businesses in the area that does the same type of operations that we conduct here. Although the attached table, 17.08.030 "Retail support use to a non-commercial business", permits us to have retail sales, we will continue to focus on our wholesale business while minimizing additional foot traffic. There is no significant influx population during certain seasonal periods, other than the increased employee base Stringer's employs during the September through January months. We increase our employee base from 30 to approximately 75-80 employees. The majority of our employees carpool to work. Yes, there is a proliferation of licensed establishments within the census tract of the proposed establishment, however most are restaurants located in the Promenade Mall. There are no sensitive uses in close proximity (500 feet) to the proposed establishment. No, the proposed establishment will not interfere with these sensitive uses or the quiet enjoyment of their property by the residents of the area because there are no residences within 3 miles of Stringers. Stringer's will not add to law enforcement problems in the area. Stringer's warehouse is fully armed with an ADT security system and all managers and supervisors have his or her own code. STREET: 26090 YNEZ ROAD TEMECULA, CA 92591 TEL: (951) 719-1356 FAX: (951) 719-1358 ABC LICENSE STATUS FOR STRINGERS LLC California ABC - License Query System - Data Summary Page 1 of 2 California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control f: - License Query System Summary T as of 1012212008 License Information icense Number: 468021 Status: PENDING rimar Owner: STRINGERS LLC BC Office of Application: RIVERSIDE Business Name oin Business As: STRINGERS LLC Business Address ddress: 26090 YNEZ RD Census Tract: 0432.10 Ci : TEMECULA Count : RIVERSIDE tate: CA Zip Code: 92591 Licensee Information icensee: STRINGERS LLC Company Officer Information Officer: STRINGER ANDREA MARIE, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER GREGERY ALLEN, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER KENNETH DALE, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER PAMELA KAY, MEMBER License Types 1 License Type: 17 - BEER AND WINE WHOLESALER License Type Status: PENDING Status Date: 17-JUN-2008 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: Expiration Date: Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA License Type was Transferred On: From: 412662 2 License Type: 14 - PUBLIC WAREHOUSE License Type Status: PENDING Status Date: 17-JUN-2008 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: Expiration Date: Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA License Type was Transferred On: From: 412662 3 License Type: 20 - OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE License Type Status: PENDING Status Date: 17-JUN-2008 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: Expiration Date: http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/LQSData.asp?ID=2029981256 10/22/2008 California ABC - License Query System - Data Summary Page 2 of 2 1 License Type was Transferred On: PEND To: 468021 4 License Type: 14 - PUBLIC WAREHOUSE License Type Status: ACTIVE Status Date: 21-NOV-2005 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: 21-NOV-2005 Expiration Date: 31-OCT-2008 Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA License Type was Transferred On: PEND To: 468021 Current Disciplinary Action F. No Active Disciplinary Action ound . Disci linarv Historv . No Disciplinary History-found... Hold Information . No Active Holds found... Escrow No Escrow found... ---End of Report--- For a definition of codes, view our glossary. http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/LQSData.asp?ID=2023262056 10/22/2008 California ABC - License Query System - Data Summary Page I of 2 "s m California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control License Query System Summary as of 1012212008 License Information icense Number: 412662 Status: ACTIVE rimar Owner: STRINGERS LLC BC Office of Application: RIVERSIDE Business Name oin Business As: STRINGERS LLC Business Address [Address: 42210 ZEVO DR Census Tract: 0432.15 Ci : TEMECULA Coun : RIVERSIDE tate: CA Zip Code: 92590 Licensee Information icensee: STRINGERS LLC I Company Officer Information Officer: STRINGER ANDREA MARIE, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER GREGERY ALLEN, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER KENNETH DALE, MEMBER Officer: STRINGER PAMELA KAY, MEMBER License Types 1 License Type: 09 - BEER AND WINE IMPORTER License Type Status: WITHDRAWAL Status Date: 10-NOV-2004 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: Expiration Date: Master: N Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA 2 License Type: 17 - BEER AND WINE WHOLESALER License Type Status: ACTIVE Status Date: 30-NOV-2004 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: 30-NOV-2004 Expiration Date: 31-OCT-2008 Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA License Type was Transferred On: PEND To: 468021 3 License Type: 20 - OFF-SALE BEER AND WINE License Type Status: ACTIVE Status Date: 30-NOV-2004 Term: Month(s) Original Issue Date: 30-NOV-2004 Expiration Date: 31-OCT-2008 Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/LQSData.asp?ID=2023262056 10/22/2008 California ABC - License Query System - Data Summary Page 2 of 2 Master: Y Duplicate: 0 Fee Code: NA License Type was Transferred On: From: 412662 Current Disci linarv Action . No Active Disciplinary Action found... Disci linarv Historv . No Disciplinary History found... Hold Information old Date: Type: FORM 220 Escrow No Escrow ound . ---End of Report--- For a definition of codes, view our glossary. http://www.abc.ca.gov/datport/LQSData.asp?ID=2029981256 10/22/2008 CENSUS TRACT INFORMATION 1 P~ F F ~ r :.,.h tfAs N a 3 ~ it 0 '9 f,Yh) ~ P Y~ 5 3 tr. .Z M L "~l 4 3222 r' j Y ~ c 0432~i N /V ozao 0 omo awo ® FM r~4 uu_z0o Md r - I i i i I ITEM 3 I STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2008 PREPARED BY: Katie Innes, Case Planner APPLICANT NAME: City of Temecula PROJECT Long Range Planning Application No. LR08-0045, a Development SUMMARY: Code Amendment to define full service hotels, revise the intensity bonus justification requirements for full service hotels whose intensity of development exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio allowed in the zone, add new parking standards for full service hotels, and add a provision to allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15061 (b) (3) RECOMMENDATION: Recommend the City Council adopt an Ordinance BACKGROUND SUMMARY In 1995, the City Council adopted the Development Code for the City of Temecula. Since its adoption, the City Council periodically amends the Development Code to improve its clarity and make corrections and amendments as necessary. This Development Code Amendment consists of four parts and proposes to: 1) Define full service hotels to clarify the difference between typical hotels/motels and full service hotels; 2) Amend the intensity bonus justification requirements for full service hotels whose intensity exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed in the zone; 3) Add new parking standards for full service hotels; and 4) Add a provision to the Development Code which allows for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel. At the August 15, 2007 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission recommended clarification and expansion of the requirements for allowing an FAR increase beyond the General Plan and Development Code Targets. The Commission directed staff to draft an Ordinance which would require measurable and quantifiable justifications to be met to allow for an increase in the target FAR. Specifically, the new requirements were to avoid granting FAR increases based upon subjective criteria such as "exceptional" architecture and landscaping. On October 23, 2007, the City Council adopted an Ordinance which requires measurable and quantifiable justification criteria for projects requesting a FAR increase above the target. The current Ordinance requires that all projects proposing an increase in the FAR beyond the target shall comply with the quantifiable justification criteria. The current criteria also requires that a traffic impact analysis be prepared for the project, as determined by the City's Traffic Engineer, and that the project provide FAR justifications from each of the four categories which include: community benefit, conservation, amenities and landscaping. The current Ordinance structure also requires an increase in the number of justification criteria required to be met, as the proposed FAR increases incrementally. i ANALYSIS Since the adoption of this Ordinance staff has found that certain uses, such as hotels, have difficulty in meeting the current FAR justification criteria. Considering the nature of hotels and their need to have multiple stories and larger building square footages as compared to, for example a typical office building, it is challenging for large scale hotels to meet the target FAR. Considering this, many of the hotels have Floor Area Ratios that are often above the allowable target allowed by the Development Code and General Plan. Below are the Floor Area Ratios for a number of hotels that have recently been constructed, or are currently being constructed, in the City: Marriott Fairfield Hampton Inn Springhill Suites Target FAR: 0.30 Target FAR: 0.30 Target FAR: 0.30 Approved FAR: 0.65 Approved FAR: 0.53 Approved FAR: 0.51 All of the approved Floor Area Ratios for the hotels listed above exceed the allowable FAR target; however they do not exceed the maximum FAR allowed by the Development Code and General Plan. Although many of the hotels constructed in the City exceed the target FAR, it is important to acknowledge that hotels provide important benefits to the community. These benefits include employment opportunities, the expansion of the City of Temecula's tourism industry, as well as providing a fiscal benefit to the City through the generation of transient occupancy tax. Encouraging projects which meet the definition of a "full service hotel," by slightly relaxing the FAR justification requirements for such development projects, would provide a direct economic benefit to the City. According to the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau, the lodging industry generated over $49.5 million dollars in hotel room revenue and occupancy rates in Temecula. Additionally, according to the same source, 457,000 visitors stayed in Temecula hotels in 2007, averaging 38,000 visitors per month. Staff is recommending that the current FAR criteria be amended to provide separate FAR requirements for "full service hotels." The proposed FAR intensity bonus justification requirements for "full service hotels" would still require that a traffic impact analysis be prepared for the project, as determined by the City's Traffic Engineer, in order to ensure that the increase in FAR above the target would not create an unmitigable traffic impact. Additionally, the new criteria would still require justifications to be based upon community benefit, conservation, amenities and landscaping; however "full service hotel" projects would be required to provide only one justification from each category, as opposed to being required to provide additional justifications as the FAR increases incrementally. In addition to amending the FAR justifications for "full service hotels," the second part of this Development Code Amendment provides a definition for full service hotels. The definition will differentiate between standard hotels/motels and full service hotels. For the purposes of this Development Code Amendment, full service hotels are defined as: hotels which provide lodging facilities and full service on-site restaurant facilities and meeting space, such as a ballroom; along with additional ancillary services within the facility, which may include health club/spa services, concierge services, room service, valet service, or similar hospitality related amenities, as determined by the Director of Planning. The objective of the proposed Development Code Amendment is to encourage the development of full service hotels in the City, while still requiring intensity bonus justifications as a trade-off to be permitted to construct a hotel that exceeds the target FAR for the zone. However, as 2 indicated above, the separate FAR justification requirements for full service hotels will not be as restrictive as the current Ordinance. The reason for requiring fewer justifications for "full service hotels," as opposed to other types of uses, is that "full service hotels" will provide a number of services and benefits that will further promote tourism and economic growth for the community. According to the Economic Development Element of the City of Temecula General Plan, the City is to encourage the development of lodging along the freeway to enhance the tourism industry and enhance fiscal viability. Staff feels that the Development Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan's goals related to tourism. Relaxing the FAR requirements for "full service hotels" will assist in continuing to promote Temecula as a destination resort area by encouraging development that will make the City a point-of-interest for visitors and residents alike. Parking Requirement In addition to defining full service hotels, and revising the FAR justification requirements for full service hotels, this Development Code Amendment also includes provisions to add new parking standards to the off-street parking section of the code for full service hotels, and to allow for tandem parking when valet service is provided. Currently the Development Code requires that regular hotels/motels provide one parking space per guest room, one parking space for every ten guest rooms plus two additional spaces for the resident manager. The proposed Development Code Amendment includes a new parking standard for full service hotels which requires onr parking space for every guest room or suite. Staff has conducted a review of other parking requirements for other municipalities in the area and determined that the parking standard of onr space per guest room or suite is typical for a hotel use. A comparison of the parking standards are outlined below: City of Riverside: 1 parking space/guest room City of Corona: 1 parking space/bedroom + 2 spaces for the resident manager City of Ontario: 1 parking space/room or suite City of Carlsbad: 1.2 parking spaces/ unit City of San Diego: 1 parking space/room City of Escondido: 1 parking space/ per sleeping unit; 1 for resident manager and 1 loading space It is anticipated that many full service hotels will provide valet services. Often when valet service is provided, the cars are parked in a tandem fashion in order to efficiently accommodate the number of cars in the lot. Currently our Development Code is silent on the requirements and provisions relating to tandem parking and valet parking. The proposed Development Code Amendment will allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel. The tandem/valet parking spaces will be permitted to be counted toward the minimum parking requirements for the use. This will encourage full service hotels to provide valet services and ensure that adequate parking accommodations are being provided for hotel guests. No change to the hotel/motel parking standards is proposed at this time due to the fact that a typical hotel/motel is less likely to provide valet parking or require the need for tandem parking spaces. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 25, 2008. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review, and a Notice of Exemption will be filed in compliance with CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code will have a significant effect on the environment. Staff concluded that there is no possibility that the Development Code Amendments will have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed Development Code Amendments are minor policy changes and clarifications to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the Development Code in context to their environmental impacts and determined that there is no potential for an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed amendments do not allow for additional development to occur or allow for significant adverse changes to the physical environment. The proposed amendment will strengthen the City's ability to conduct a CEQA review for the future development of full service hotels since the Development Code Amendment requires the preparation of a traffic study. As a result, a site-specific CEQA review will occur for every development application for full service hotels. These proposed amendments are minor clarifications of the Code and will ensure compliance with CEQA. As such, there is no possibility that the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code will have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, staff has concluded that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Section 15061(b)(3), as it has been determined, with certainty, that there is no possibility that the Development Code Amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft CC Ordinance Redline/strikeout changes to the Development Code Exhibit A - Section 17.08.050 Special Use Regulations and Standards Exhibit B - Section 17.24.020 General Provisions Exhibit C - Table 17.24.040 Parking Spaces Required Exhibit D - Section 17.34.010 Definition of Terms Notice of Public Hearing 4 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE FULL SERVICE HOTELS, REVISE THE INTENSITY BONUS JUSTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS WHOSE INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE TARGET FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED IN THE ZONE, ADD NEW PARKING STANDARDS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS, AND ADD A PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHEN VALET SERVICE IS PROVIDED AT A FULL SERVICE HOTEL. (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR08-0045)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 5, 2008 the Planning Commission identified a need to amend Chapter 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code to define "full service hotels," revise the intensity bonus requirements for "full service hotels" whose intensity of development exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio allowed in the zone, add new parking standards for full service hotels, and add a provision to allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel (Long Range Planning Application No. LR08- 0045). B. The application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and environmental review on November 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve Long Range Planning Application No. LR08-0045, subject to, and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Recommendation of Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance amending portions of Chapter 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Long Range Planning Application No. LR08- 0045 (Ordinance No. 08- ) is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance amendment will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no possibility that the Code amendments will have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed Development Code Amendments are minor policy changes and clarifications to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the Development Code in context to their environmental impacts and determined that there is no potential for an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed amendments do not allow for additional development to occur or allow for significant adverse changes to the physical environment. The proposed amendment will strengthen the City's ability to conduct CEQA review for the future development of full service hotels within the City since the Development Code Amendment requires the preparation of a traffic study for projects which exceed the target intensity (Floor Area Ratio). As a result, site-specific CEQA review will occur for every development application for full service hotels. The proposed amendments are minor clarifications of the Code and will ensure compliance with CEQA. As such, there is no possibility that the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code will have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, staff has concluded that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Section 15061 (b) (3), as it has been determined, with certainty, that there is no possibility that the Development Code Amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council approve Long Range Planning Application No. LR08-0045, a proposed Citywide Ordinance as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of November 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of November 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE FULL SERVICE HOTELS, REVISE THE INTENSITY BONUS JUSTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS WHOSE INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE TARGET FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED IN THE ZONE, ADD NEW PARKING STANDARDS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS, AND ADD A PROVISIONS TO ALLOW FOR TANDEM PARKING SPACES FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS WHEN VALET SERVICE IS PROVIDED (LONG RANGE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. LR08-0045) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUtA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code were processed and an environmental review was conducted as required by the California Environmental Quality Act. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on November 5, 2008, to consider the proposed amendments at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the matter. C. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed amendments, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-_, recommending that the City Council approve the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. D. On November 18, 2008, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments at which time all persons interested in the proposed amendments had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters, and following receipt of all public testimony closed the hearing. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, in approving the proposed Municipal Code amendments in Long Range Planning Application No. LR08-0045 hereby makes the following additional findings as required by section 17.01.040 ('Relationship to the General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are allowed in the land use designations in which the uses are located, as shown on the land use map, or are described in the text of the General Plan. B. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan. C. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are consistent with the general plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. Section 3. Environmental Findings. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance No. 08-_ is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no possibility that the Code amendments will have a significant effect on the environment because the proposed Development Code Amendments are minor policy changes and clarifications to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Staff has reviewed the proposed changes to the Development Code in context to their environmental impacts and determined that there is no potential for an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed amendments do not allow for additional development to occur or allow for significant adverse changes to the physical environment. The proposed amendment will strengthen the City's ability to conduct CEQA review for the future development of full service hotels within the City since the Development Code Amendment requires the preparation of a traffic study for projects which exceed the target intensity (Floor Area Ratio). As a result, site-specific CEQA review will occur for every development application for full service hotels. The proposed amendments are minor clarifications of the Code and will ensure compliance with CEQA. As such, there is no possibility that the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code will have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, staff has concluded that the project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Section 15061 (b) (3), as it has been determined, with certainty, that there is no possibility that the Development Code amendments will have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends subsection 17.08.050 (A) of the Temecula Municipal Code by replacing it in its entirety to read as follows: A. Commercial/Office/Industrial Incentives-Increases in the Floor Area Ratio. As part of the process of reviewing and approving an application for a Development Plan or Conditional Use Permit, the approval authority may consider an increase in the maximum allowable intensity as indicated in Table 17.08.040A. The amount of the increased intensity shall not exceed the maximum of the density range or Floor Area Ratio stated for the specific land use designation. The requested increase may not be approved if the City Engineer determines that the increased intensity would create an unmitigatable impact upon traffic circulation or would overburden any utilities serving the area. To be eligible for an increase in the floor area ratio, the applicant must meet the following: 1. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared for the project as determined by the City Engineer. 2. All projects, (with the exception of "full service hotels", for which separate justification requirements are provided below in Section 17.08.050. (3) shall provide for FAR increase justifications from Table 17.08.050A as follows: a. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.01 to 0.10 shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, one justification from Category III, and one justification from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. b. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.11 to 0.20 shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, one justification from Category II, one justification from Category III, and one justification from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. C. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.21 to 0.30 shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, two justifications from Category II, two justifications from Category III, and two justifications from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. d. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.31 or more shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, three justifications from Category II, three justifications from Category III, and three justifications from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. 3. Full service hotel projects, must provide FAR increase justifications from Table 17.08.050 A as follows: a. Full service hotel projects proposing an FAR increase above the target FAR allowed for the zone shall incorporate one justification from Category I, one justification from Category II, one justification from Category III and one justification from Category IV, of Table 17.08.050A. Table 17.08.050A Justifications for an FAR Increase Category I Category II Category III Category IV Amenities Landscape & Art Community Benefit Conservation Uses which generate Utilize LEED Provide Provide trees at significant sales tax, or (Leadership in Energy bicycle 40% 36" box, uses that generate and Environmental lockers or 40% 24" box, and transient occupancy tax Design) eligible recycled lockable 20% 15-gallon building materials (such indoor sizes with all as exterior siding, storage, street and parking roofing changing lot tree sizes at a materials, and carpet - rooms, and minimum 24-inch 20% minimum recycle showers box size at the content time of planting The project generate Utilize LEED eligible Provide a Increase a significant number of energy efficient location for landscaped open higher paying jobs materials and design to an on-site space area (higher paying jobs are include: roofing, daycare (increase must be considered skilled and insulation, exterior facility or equal to or professional jobs that siding, shading from provide a greater than 2% provide awnings and deep location for a of the site area incomes of at least one- recessed windows, daycare for each 0.05 half the median automated sensors and provider increase in FAR) household income for the controls for lighting, city of Temecula) heating, and air conditioning, waterless urinals, low-flow toilets and faucets, and aerators and timers on faucets Provide enhanced public Provide for on-site Provide Increase facilities that are needed renewable energy parking landscaped by the city beyond (minimum of 10% of the designated setback (at least required mitigation impact facilities energy needs) as a park two feet measures. Examples and ride additional for include: the provision of facility each 0.05 community meeting increase in FAR) centers, enhanced transportation improvements, police or fire stations, and public recreation facilities Table 17.08.050A Justifications for an FAR Increase Category I Category II Category III Category IV Amenities Landscape & Art Community Benefit Conservation Utilize "green roof' Provide a Provide an on- technology landscaped site public art courtyard feature of equal open to a or greater value public street than required by (minimum the city's public area equal art ordinance and to 10% of in compliance the ground with the city's floor area) public art ordinance Provide water quality mitigation in excess of minimum NPDES re uirements Provide all air conditioning equipment at a SEER rating that exceeds the minimum California Building Code re uirement Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends subsection 17.24.020 to add a new section 17.24.020 (F) to follow Section E, to read as follows: F. Tandem Parking/Valet Parking. Tandem parking for commercial uses may be approved provided that the tandem parking is limited to the following purposes: 1. Valet parking associated with a full service hotel. Tandem parking spaces associated with valet service may be counted toward meeting the minimum parking requirements for the use. 2. Valet service shall be provided to and from the main entrance of the hotel. A passenger loading and unloading zone, as approved by the City Engineer shall be provided near the main entrance. 3. Availability of valet service shall be conspicuously posted inside and outside the establishment near the main entrance. 4. All designated valet parking area in which the automobiles are to be parked shall not be farther than 800 feet from the main entrance. Section 6. The City Council of the City of Temecula amends table 17.24.040 "Parking Spaces Required" to add a new row for "full service hotels" under the "Commercial Uses- Retail and Service" column, and by adding "one space per hotel room or suite" under the corresponding row under the "Required Number of Spaces" column, as follows: Commercial Uses-Retail and Service Furniture stores, bulk goods, floor covering, 1 space/500 SF of GFA home improvement General retail with less than 25,000 SF-GFA 1 s ace/300 SF-GFA General retail with 25,000 SF or greater See shopping center Hotels and motels 1 space/guest room plus 1 space/10 rooms for uests and 2 s aces for resident manager Full Service Hotel 1 space/guest room or suite Laundromat 1 s ace/3 washing machines Plant nurseries 1 space/500 SF indoor GFA, plus 1 s ace/1,000 SF gross outdoor retail area Outdoor sales, including lumberyards, car 1 space/1,000 SF gross outdoor sales area, sales, salvage yards plus 1 s ace/300 SF of indoor sales area Restaurants Dine-in 1 space/100 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 spaces in all cases Fast food 1 space/75 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 spaces in all cases Shopping center (25,000 SF-GFA or 1 space/300 SF-GFA with the following greater) additions: Cinemas in shopping centers 1 s ace/5 seats Restaurant areas occupying greater than 1 space/100 GFA 15 percent of total shopping area GFA Section 7. The City Council of the City of Temecula adds to Section 17.34.010 "Definitions and Illustrations of Terms," a new definition for full service hotels under subsection "F" Definitions and Illustrations, to read as follows: "Full Service Hotels" means a hotel which provides lodging facilities and full service on-site restaurant facilities and meeting space, such as a ballroom; along with additional ancillary services within the facility, which may include health club/spa services, concierge services, room service, valet service, or similar hospitality related amenities, as determined by the Director of Planning. Section 8. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. Section 9. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 18 day of November, 2008. Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 08- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 18th day of November, 2008, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A SECTION 17.08.050 SPECIAL USE REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS Proposed text looks like this. Deleted text'evu° rue rhms Development Code Section - 17.08.050 Special Use Regulations and Standards A. Commercial/Office/Industrial Incentives-hlcreases in the Floor Area Ratio. As part of the process of reviewing and approving an application for a development plan or conditional use permit, the approval authority may consider an increase in the maximum allowable intensity as indicated in Tables 17.08.040A. The amount of the increased intensity shall not exceed the maximum of the density range or floor area ratio stated for the specific land use designation. The requested increase may not be approved if the City engineer determines that the increased intensity would create an unmitigatable impact upon traffic circulation or would overburden any utilities serving the area. To be eligible for an increase in the floor area ratio, the applicant must meet the following: 1. A traffic impact analysis shall be prepared for the project as determined by the city engineer. 2. All projects, (with the exception of "full service hotels", for which separate Justification requirements are provided below in Section 17.08.050 (31, shall -F provide for FAR increase justifications from Table 17.08.050A as follows: a. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.01 to 0.10 shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, one justification from Category 111, and one justification from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. b. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.11 to 0.20 shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, one justification from Category 11, one justification from Category III, and one justification from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. c. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.21 to 0.30 shall incorporate two justifications from Category 1, two justifications from Category II, two justifications from Category III, and two justifications from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. d. Projects proposing an FAR increase of 0.31 or more shall incorporate two justifications from Category I, three justifications from Category 11, three justifications from Category 111, and three justifications from Category IV of Table 17.08.050A. 3. Full service hotel projects, must provide FAR increase iustifications from Table 17.08.050 A as follows: a. Full service hotel projects proposing an FAR increase above the target FAR allowed for the zone shall incorporate one iustifrcation from Category I, one justification from Category H, one Justification from Category III and one justification from Category IV, of Table 17.08.050A. R:\LR Projects\2008\LR08-0045 Development Code Amendment FAR\redline-strikeout changes 17.05.080 A.doc Proposed text looks like this. Table 17.08.050A Justifications for an FAR Increase Category I Category II Category Category IV III Landscape & Community Benefit Conservation Amenities Art Uses which generate Utilize LEED Provide Provide trees at significant sales tax, or (Leadership in Energy bicycle 40% 36" box, uses that generate and Environmental lockers or 40% 24" box, and transient occupancy tax Design) eligible recycled lockable 20% 15-gallon building materials (such indoor sizes with all as exterior siding, storage, street and parking roofing changing lot tree sizes at a materials, and carpet - rooms, and minimum 24-inch 20% minimum recycle showers box size at the content time of plant ng The project generate Utilize LEED eligible Provide a Increase a significant number of energy efficient location for landscaped open higher paying jobs materials and design to an on-site space area (higher paying jobs are include: roofing, daycare (increase must be considered skilled and insulation, exterior facility or equal to or greater professional jobs that siding, shading from provide a than 2% of the provide awnings and deep location for site area for each incomes of at least one- recessed windows, a daycare 0.05 increase in half the median automated sensors and provider FAR) household income for the controls for lighting, city of Temecula) heating, and air conditioning, waterless urinals, low-flow toilets and faucets, and aerators and timers on faucets Provide enhanced public Provide for on-site Provide Increase facilities that are needed renewable energy parking landscaped by the city beyond (minimum of 10% of the designated setback (at least required facilities energy needs) as a park and two feet mitigation impact ride facility additional for measures. Examples each 0.05 increase include: the in FAR) provision of community meeting centers, enhanced transportation improvements, police or fire stations, and public recreation facilities R:\LR Projects\2008\LR08-0045 Development Code Amendment FAR\redline-strikeout changes 17.05.080 A.doc Proposed text looks like this. Deleted text look` 1ke thms Table 17.08.050A Justifications for an FAR Increase Category I Category II Category Category IV III Landscape & Community Benefit Conservation Amenities Art Utilize "green roof' Provide a Provide an on-site technology landscaped public art feature courtyard of equal or greater open to a value than public street required by the (minimum city's public art area equal to ordinance and in 10% of the compliance with ground floor the city's public area) art ordinance Provide water quality mitigation in excess of minimum NPDES requirements Provide all air conditioning equipment at a SEER rating that exceeds the minimum California Building Code requirement R:\LR Projects\2008\LR08-0045 Development Code Amendment FAR\redline-strikeout changes 17.05.080 A.doc EXHIBIT B SECTION 17.24.020 GENERAL PROVISIONS Proposed text looks like this. ^nintnd tpxt innkc; llkp thhc; Development Code Section - 17.24.020 - General Provisions E. Shared Parking. The director of planning may, upon application by the owner or lessee of any property, authorize shared use of parking facilities under the conditions specified herein: up to fifty percent of the required parking facilities for a use considered to be primarily a daytime use may be provided by the parking facilities of a use considered to be primarily a nighttime use; and up to fifty percent of the required parking facilities for a use considered to be primarily a nighttime use may be provided by the parking facilities of a use considered to be primarily a daytime use. However, such reciprocal parking arrangements shall be subject to the conditions set forth in paragraphs listed below in this section. The following uses are typical nighttime uses: bowling alleys, dancehalls, theaters, restaurants (with limited hours), bars, nightclubs, auditoriums, and meeting halls. Other uses such as churches, schools and offices combined with recreational facilities may allow use of shared parking facilities. Conditions required for shared parking are as follows: 1. The building or use which an application is being made shall be located within three hundred feet of the existing off-street parking facility. 2. Sufficient evidence shall be presented to the planning department demonstrating that no substantial conflict in the principal hours or periods of peak demand of the structures or uses for which the joint use is proposed will exist. 3. Parties involved in the use of shared parking facilities shall submit evidence of an agreement for such joint use by a proper legal instrument recorded in the office of the county recorder of the county of Riverside with a copy filed with the city. F. Tandem Parking/Valet Parking. Tandem parking for commercial uses may be approved provided that the tandem parking is limited to the following purposes: 1. Valet parking associated with a full service hotel. Tandem parking spaces associated with valet service may be counted toward meeting the minimum parking requirements for the use. 2. Valet service shall be provided to and from the main entrance of the hotel. A passenger loading and unloading zone, as approved by the city engineer shall be provided near the main entrance. 3. Availability of valet service shall be conspicuously posted inside and outside the establishment near the main entrance. 4. All designated valet parking area in which the automobiles are to be parked shall not be farther than 800 feet from the main entrance. R:\LR Projects\2008\LR08-0045 Development Code Amendment FAR\Parking - redlined .doc EXHIBIT C TABLE 17.24.040 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED Proposed text looks like this. Development Code Section - 17.24.040 Parking Requirements Table 17.24.040 Parkin Spaces Required Commercial Uses-Retail and Service Furniture stores, bulk goods, floor 1 space/500 SF of GFA covering, home improvement General retail with less than 25,000 SF- 1 space/300 SF-GFA GFA General retail with 25,000 SF or greater See shopping center Hotels and motels 1 space/guest room plus 1 space/10 rooms for guests and 2 spaces for resident manager Full Service Hotel 1 space/guest room Laundromat 1 s ace/3 washing machines Plant nurseries 1 space/500 SF indoor GFA, plus 1 s ace/1,000 SF gross outdoor retail area Outdoor sales, including lumberyards, car 1 space/1,000 SF gross outdoor sales sales, salvage yards area, plus 1 space/300 SF of indoor sales area Restaurants Dine-in 1 space/100 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 spaces in all cases Fast food 1 space/75 SF-GFA, with a minimum of 10 s aces in all cases Shopping center (25,000 SF-GFA or 1 space/300 SF-GFA with the following greater) additions: Cinemas in shopping centers 1 s ace/5 seats Restaurant areas occupying greater 1 space/100 GFA than 15 percent of total shopping area GFA R:\LR Projects\2008\LR08-0045 Development Code Amendment FAR\Parking - redlined .doc EXHIBIT D SECTION 17.34.010 DEFINITION OF TERMS Proposed text looks like this. n°I°tPd t°"t Icink,; ldkp this Development Code Section - 17.34.010 Definitions of Terms 17.34.010 (F) F. "F" Definitions and Illustrations. "Facade" means a building's exterior wall which is exposed to public view. "Family day care home" means a home which regularly provides care, protection, and supervision of twelve or fewer children, in the provider's own home, for periods of less than twenty-four hours per day, while the parents or guardians are away. This includes large and small family day care homes. Family Day Care Home, Small. "Small family day care home" means a home which provides family day care to six or fewer children, including children under the age of ten years who reside in the home. Family Day Care Home, Large. "Large family day care home" means a home which provides family day care to seven to twelve children, including children under the age of ten years who reside in the home. "Financial institution" means an establishment or facility for the custody, loan, exchange or issue of money; for the extension of credit; and for facilitating the transmission of funds. "Findings" means the factors that the approving authority must consider as a part of approving or denying a development permit. Statements of findings shall be included in the record of actions taken by the approving authority. "Flashing sign" means any sign, except time and temperature displays that do not include advertising, which contains or is illuminated by lights which are intermittently on and off, which change intensity or color, or which create the illusion of motion in any manner, including animated signs which manifest a physical movement or rotation in one or more planes or the optical illusion of action or motion. "Flood" means a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of land areas from the overflow of inland and tidal waters, and the rapid accumulation of runoff of surface waters from any source and mudslides (i.e., mudflows) which are proximately caused or precipitated by accumulations of water on or under the ground. Flood, One-Hundred-Year. "One-hundred-year flood" means the magnitude of a flood expected to occur on the average every one hundred years, based on historical data. The one-hundred-year flood has a one to one hundred, or one percent, chance of occurring in any given year. "Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Boundary and Floodway Map" means the official maps on which the Federal Insurance Administration has delineated the areas of special flood hazard, the risk premium zones and the floodways applicable to the community. "Floodplain" means the relatively level land area on either side of the banks of a stream regularly subject to flooding. That part of the floodplain subject to a one percent chance of flooding in any given year is designated as an "area of special flood hazard" by the Federal Insurance Administration. Proposed text looks like this. "Floodplain fringe" means all land between the floodway and the upper elevation of the one-hundred-year flood. nua u. n.»~wNO.ns nray)RI.(V new.., ntKU rww~ NtFw {l~'i''Y'AY~.I .MIA 1 1 L~1dKllMlllf "Floodproofing" means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures and their contents. "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land area that must be reserved in order to discharge a one-hundred-year flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than one foot. No development is allowed in floodways. "Floor area ratio" means the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the gross lot area. Floor Area, Gross. "Gross floor area" means the total horizontal area of a building, in square feet, including the exterior walls of all floors. Floor Area, Gross Usable. "Gross usable floor area" means the gross floor area minus the primary entrance lobby to a building, utility or mechanical equipment rooms, elevator cores, stairwells and bathrooms. Floor Area, Net. "Net floor area" means the total of all floor areas of a building, excluding stairwells and elevator shafts, equipment rooms, interior vehicular parking or loading; and all floors below the first or ground floor, except when used or intended to be used for human habitation or service to the public. "For rent signs" means permanent signs in multifamily complexes to identify availability of rental units. "Foster family home" means any residential facility providing twenty-four hour care for six or fewer foster children which is owned, leased or rented and is the residence of the foster parents, including their family, in whose care the foster children have been placed. "Freestanding sign" means a sign permanently supported by one or more uprights, braces, poles or other similar structural components, and attached to the ground or foundation set in the ground. "Freeway frontage" means the boundary of a parcel abutting an interstate freeway. Proposed text looks like this. DPIPted text Innks rc^ th's "Freeway oriented sign" means a sign located on a parcel with freeway frontage that is oriented toward the freeway. Front Lot Lines. Occasionally, a lot fronts on more than one street. In such cases, requirements shall be observed in identifying the front lot line. The lot line fronting the street providing primary access to the lot shall be the front lot line. If the lot in question is a comer lot'classification, the narrower of the two frontages shall be designated as the front lot line. "Frontage" means the boundary of a building, parcel or site along public streets including freeways, parking lots or pedestrian malls. "Full Service Hotels" means a hotel which provides lodging facilities and full service on-site restaurant facilities and meeting space, such as a ballroom; alone with additional ancillary services within the facility, which may include health club/spa services concierge services, roo►n service, valet service, or similar hospitality related amenities, as determined by the Director of Planning. "Future tenant identification sign" means a temporary sign which identifies a future use of a site or building(s). NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING A' Notice of Public Hearing 19 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: LR08-0045 Applicant: City of Temecula Proposal: A Development Code Amendment to define full service hotels, revise the intensity bonus justification requirements for full service hotels whose intensity exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio allowed in the zone, add new parking standards for full service hotels, and add a provision to allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel Location: Citywide Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be filed in compliance with CEQA Section 15061(b)(3) Case Planner: Katie Innes Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: November 5, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at , or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. i i i i I i i i ~ I i ITEM 4 I i I STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2008 PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA08-0162, a Major Modification to SUMMARY: modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant, Five 'N Diner (approved Development Plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union, generally located on the east side of Ynez approximately 500 feet south of Winchester at 26460 Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Geoff Bonney, Bonney Architects General Plan Community Commercial Designation: Zoning Designation: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7); Planning Area 1 - Commercial Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Restaurant (vacant, Five 'N Diner)/Community Commercial (CC) North: Restaurant (existing Roadhouse Grill)/Community Commercial (CC) South: Retail/office suites/Community Commercial (CC) East: Restaurant (existing Johnny Carino's)/Community Commercial (CC) West: Retail center across Ynez/Community Commercial (CC) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 31,613 square feet n/a Total Floor Area/Ratio: 3,453 sq. ft./0.11 existing n/a Landscape Area/Coverage: 6,450 sq. ft./20% existing 4,741 sq. ft./15% required Parking Required/Provided: 41 spaces provided 14 spaces required BACKGROUND SUMMARY i On February 16, 2000, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA99- 0476, a Development Plan to construct and operate a restaurant (Five 'N Diner) located on the eastside of Ynez Road, approximately 500 feet south of Winchester within the mall out lots (Pad N). On July 28, 2008, a Major Modification to reconstruct the exterior elevations to convert the existing restaurant into a bank building was submitted to the Planning Department. Since the proposed Major Modification is a substantial change in the architecture, and approval of major modifications requires consideration by the original approval body, Planning Commission is the appropriate approval body for this Major Modification application. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project proposes a 360-degree exterior architectural renovation to the exterior facade of a 3,453 square foot structure to convert an existing corrugated metal 1950's-style American diner restaurant into a modern Mediterranean stucco bank structure. Site Plan/Access Circulation The proposed Major Modification will result in no changes to the site plan or building footprint, except a proposed entrance colonnade that extends approximately six feet along the east elevation. This is an existing building that meets the minimum setback requirements and development standards of Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7). The site provides 41 parking spaces, which exceeds the required 14 parking spaces for a financial institution of this size. While pedestrian pathways and handicapped parking have been modified slightly to accommodate new entrance doorways, existing vehicular access and circulation will remain the same. Architecture The proposed building exterior modifications propose to replace the existing corrugated metal siding with a smooth stucco finish, and a complementary slate wainscot base along the perimeter of all elevations. The architectural style of the building integrates Mediterranean elements to coordinate with the other buildings located within the other mall out lots. Compatibility with the neighboring buildings is achieved with paint colors, building materials and architectural style. All elevations embrace well balanced symmetrically placed recessed windows. The smooth stucco finish includes shades of beige, which have been carefully selected to accentuate the breaks in wall planes and provide articulation. The bank's ATM machine is integrated within the stucco wall on the east elevation. The varied roofline, arched entrance colonnade, and ornamental slate provide openings, recesses and decorative enhancements that create light and shadow to enhance visual interest. A cornice trim balances the structure's profile. All elevations provide 360-degree architectural enhancements and coordinate well with the other mall out lot structures. The proposed architecture is consistent with the provisions contained within the Architectural Guidelines for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7). 2 Landscaping Based upon relocation of the main entrance from the south side to the east side, landscaping has been modified to incorporate new planter areas and walkways. The overall site includes 20 percent landscaping which exceeds the minimum 15 percent landscaping requirement for the site. Most of the existing landscaping, including purple leafed plum trees, will remain intact except where new walkways are proposed to accommodate new entrance doors. Additionally, an existing five-foot wide planter will be increased to 10-feet wide along the main entrance (east side) of the structure providing additional landscaping including four 15-gallon crape myrtle trees. The rear (west side) of the structure faces Ynez Road and is softened with an existing landscaped berm with mature shrubs and trees, which will be protected in place. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 25, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15302, Class 1 Existing Facilities). The project involves no expansion of an existing facility. The proposed building modifications are aesthetic modifications and enhancements to an existing building, which involves negligible expansion of the footprint of the floor area. FINDINGS Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.05.030, modifications to an approved Development Plan shall require the same findings as were made on the original approval: The proposal, a restaurant, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and Fire and Building Codes. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. 3 ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing 4 VICINITY MAP City of Temecula PA08-0162 t,« Project Site F2 Q alloy o0.0 0 ~pCO Legend 0 112.5 225 450 675 N Feet ~ Fault Lines This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. Fault Zones The map is cleaved from base data produced by the Rivaraide County Assessors Departnent and the Transportation and Land Management Aganoy of Riverside County. The City of Temewla assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map ere subfeCt W update erdl modRication. The Geographic Information System and dher sources should be quaned for the most anent information. This map is not for repaint or resale. R\GISAarbnMWrcMap Pmtect$lParcelSearA, mxd AERIAL MAP l ; , Ill 'iy 10 , d ~ ri 1 " ,4 r P~ - Qcp .-T e C T! S TCM@CII LEA PLAN REDUCTIONS 111iF.;F•6'nll rs;;jmq,m ",,I...sppil.... -M nq'I"j'O'IIt°':".pl.•O nj;P •E•IIIIIIIIIIIIIVr{sipi4inzlnluu••'O p;pl•1•.•Iap•4m q Iftpll• m' 199RInx;a'•-•••• nnllF i iii P o .q (I 1 I n ijiji tI li'IIill,.c~~'I,I~ IIIIII IIi~ItI[liil I Illlll'~'~ III'IIIIlPlllp mllglpull~IIIIIIIIIA'EII"IGy''iFipnll 419'Igl FIFI n 1 EI n it I EIIIIn I! III If lift 11fl., I F il; I; I.. F I I i I { t ; II I ~I FI t IF I I P i I I t: I, qi' U NI I I I ' I j 9 1~ ns•F•"..1119+.yO.;.'asO I...Iilli'ti+F'°n.;m I.PO.I•'O6nin' ..4gqn....pinmicwmjl.... I...r...><.nc..P• I-s l...nIfni Vnx ;F•gv.[w........ P+~ 911111~IIIIIIiIIF I Ilglll'I'ii{`+mtll IIIPIIIP I'IP tlnll,~lll'IIIIII~iII IpIIIIII~ Ittitil Eli "t q{tt' ail'illtlllll; IIIFt~IFII;IItF I F yl L y {II,II I I I I I 11 I I I II IIa F it I ' ~1 ....un... EWU...... illc.s.i:yVl If... ...4111.1.."IK,nii;'•i•l"t61i•[['a ' F IIIiIIII-111 I IIIIIIIIII, pill 1:11m l:111I r.' InIPElI4InIInII~{IFII'I';u'lI4IEF g p I I• I IIRI II E I FI lI II Ki @ P~ p`~ p ~~H9SBSS89 I C E i i I o~ E I I I t 4 6 ~ N t° ~ ~~t•~a"~ i 4 1 1 g I I i I I ~ ~~Il 19 i l 1 1 E 1 ~ ~J ~ ✓ / ~ xB ~i@~ S ~ ~a e a ~ ~~yi FBI ` ~ y~ . IN it A 1tv 1 s~ LJ N ~ 11 °e9 N d d Is E--] .r o ,..dBeB. . B~F BB.... D : arl9iaffr PBBOMW O®I1 I111w ~ ei oP.E oESwv.w1 ' _1 .fi eu .BOXX.E Y,:n n.. 1 wvI WiY MN 90Ofll I PP_NITELiS ,e ~ w.A PTiY Bd Z-P9.rtA O a PIIAI~i dO.l11p11 ~ MgWd11~1 ~f dll VN d M ~ i16~ ■E . iai < . 1~"1 ~ a~ yp m 1 " 1 K { 2a F ~ F F t F F F ~ d Paa • 9~ R R • ~ a a s t ♦ " ai Il~~a X11 11~i~'a a 11 a~ `a ~~d~d Flip' e " F i a i i F A P F ~q~ ea ]o ~11~ r ■■1 11py9 23Hof ~ 1 . d€d ~ 3a I~Pg~ ~InP a~ n ~~Q 1 1a.a~ o~ . da B aE fI,,,Np IXWIFM. RO@I W Tw OREWOH PMI..AO e- V RANINO RAN oimr eNOx cocoa r r = ROHHEV WSIA + ~•RCHITEC iS °L llrvw...Tf _8' °u come u°u ne.e ~y.~_y W 0 0 0 o lip Z }IG~i 'c _ _ y"~I- IO Ld Id W IO IO ° T €J.T tjx ® da ~ I~A m 2 0 ~ s 0 8 AXk tD ~(C "®®o®OIIIII IT a ~I®-rF.1 I i E t 2 t Hill i 9 ~ ~ 9 2 A k J i l l k ° 11 "P 9a p k k k m r a ¢ 6 t! ~ rvwr-33 { 1p 2 ~ ~igi jI i4~ZEi 4d 4 ~9eli ! i key o€ }¢1 ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ N P1~Y f ~S. ~~~3 ~ ~ ~ • 4 121 Q •A 3 1; OINYODR~IIt R11°iT OGI~LTMR ORtYtOI IEMIt 91E FiAN ~a~ unR ~ er oRrz rcsoepna D - TtEetNat~ eovx EV i Rum ionrmw RBRIN e ~i RR.NIi ECii' - ~ W YMT IX6MTd lE-9BiRN r Mtt~W OROIItOI n n tin nan n t fM CCYrOR~I'rEtRl r•• . VN q YW t as _________________i------ I ' I { I , a~ I p I O ' , s I I _ I i• i E I ~ I 3 { I s d a ~ { I me y ' ; Y4 'I ' 8; a yr I I ; I i ' 4i I a I mil/ sv ~ 9 I I ~ I C p R E ° i E--- r E•pT ~ ~ E_ F a x 3 x R R d m A • F'+~mnem wcsr ea~~,wn p~Ea wrn rs ! ROOfi RAN vwsuoomrus t{~~~-i xo er oAa oESOronax D vYy~ ~ ~{'{/BOHx•E V;.rl rp., BrH ~monw ~"ianw _I _ CSI FE31r~++»APCxIiECi$ N a Y.a...eamuo QQ0~ k~ ?i Rb A - 1 I I ~ I i , e o gP g ~ q ❑ 1 4 I i 'i I - a I I I ~ I 1 I I , I I I ` _ I 1 I O I 1 ❑I I 1 I I~ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I ~ I I II 1 ~ I I 0 1 ^ T f I j I I \V/ I 1 9~i~ I I ]P I y II ❑I Y ; II i I I I 1~ I ~F CA-- ` i `I 11' I 1 1 7y I I 1 1 ❑ 1 I E I II -V 1 I N'' I I 1 I ~ I 3 ~ 3 I I I F I I F - I rt-~ J ee g r, K A eP uwwr ml~m rrosr eel~ulwr ~I~FO nom rs f RDOF RAN iwlo~laeavrus Br o~ic wm m~r~uul airtr D tl=tl rW ~IBBNNFYV.vI .Y1Y MN [-9BR PPCNIi F[i5 W gAIIM/OOOIYO tl(YMm11011Y/I. rill 7s 7r a , „ , i s 'v 'c 8 8 N f F A . b I D . IX161011HEVAT10~6 II.~RC ~R,RO, erwm ~KO oExawnox !•R1Y~bY BOH4EV ~ wYY, S9RRK I~A.GR~, ARCHI LEGS If~fb1KN ,V]MM K-T-d~i''0 BAR R FIRIp.IR1RO~R 11801 J Y011111111q qG YY111I ' I I 1z N TfFF Jill F ~ 6r m FM ev ouE oESwpnox i EJfI9i01i aEVAMb ~ ~ ~ a D yw NQIIOM BGHNEV V19 W1A gy11'A1g19M1K A PC X I T E[ T S wvI w4f1O1R~1-~rt'K i ~ II.IOYIW OOII..TI IV bN1.a111.1.~E.RI = t t ~s CI t a fi$ , x x I i , ; , , i i b N n t! ov...mnMn Oi! oo~aTM Daxe wavo eunaoati cre w,e~ranmwa BY OAIE pE5411pTpl D ~ YrY1Q Mi 00MMfV t ,MO1 ,Im[AlYM A9f,iM W _ nYY, '®APCXI tEC iS' e WvIrMFIgI R-9Mf/A 4 Mb~VOOO! V~lll W if0Y~11~11fr[R, .n .nnnt ,r.u ni PC RESOLUTION i PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0162, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO MODIFY ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT, FIVE `N DINER (APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PA99-0476), TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS A BANK, ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET SOUTH OF WINCHESTER AT 26460 YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-320-037) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 5, 2008 the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0162 a Major Modification to modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant, Five 'N Diner (approved Development Plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union, generally located on the east side of Ynez approximately 500 feet south of Winchester at 26460 Ynez Road. B. On July 28, 2008, Geoff Bonney of Bonney Architects, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0162, a Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0162 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that pursuant to Development Code Section 17.05.030, modifications to an approved Development Plan shall require the same findings as were made on the original approval: A. The proposal, a bank, is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected in the Community Commercial (CC) land use standards in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for Temecula Regional 2 Center Specific Plan. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of commercial development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinance, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, Ordinance No. 655 (Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance), and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping provisions, and Fire and Building Codes. B. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities); The project involves no expansion of an existing facility. The proposed building modifications are aesthetic modifications and enhancements to an existing building, which involves negligible expansion of the footprint of the floor area. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0162, a Major Modification to modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant, Five 'N Diner (approved development plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union, generally located on the east side of Ynez, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. 3 Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5m day of November 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of November 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary 4 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: i EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA08-0162 Project Description: Planning Application Number PA08-0162, a Major Modification to modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant, Five'N Diner (approved development plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union, generally located on the east side of Ynez approximately 500 feet south of Winchester at 26460 Ynez Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-320-037 MSHCP Category: N/A DIF Category: N/A TUMF Category: N/A Approval Date: November 5, 2008 Expiration Date: November 5, 2010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. 3 General Requirements PL-3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date, otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the one year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-7. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 7). PL-8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL-9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-11. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 4 PL-12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL-13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Stucco main body Sherwin Williams 6113 Interactive Cream Stucco accent Sherwin Williams 6116 Tatami Tan Stucco accent DEW380 White Stucco accent DE5266 Crushed Cashew Stucco trim DEA158 Northern Territory Slate tile Califonria Gold Granite tile Black Galaxy Finish PL-14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL-15. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved the Director of Planning. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-16. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL-17. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL-18. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-19. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. 5 PL-20. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Two landscape site inspections are required: One inspection is required prior to irrigation line trenches being closed for inspection of the irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." PL-21. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-22. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan), and the locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the Tentative Map. PL-23. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-24. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/ owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-25. Automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. PL-26. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL-27. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL-28. Construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 6 Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-29. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-30. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. PL-31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-32. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-33. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL-34. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL-35. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. 7 PL-36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-5. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-6. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-7. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21, specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. At Plan Review Submittal B-8. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-9. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-10. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-11. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 8 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information CS-1. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. CS-2. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits CS-3. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The building in non-sprinklered with an existing fire alarm system. The building is not required to be sprinklered as it is under the square footage for sprinkler requirements; however, the fire alarm system will need to be compliant with the current codes and regulations adopted by the state and City. F-3. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection (CFC Chapter 1). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-4. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-5. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots per Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-6. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall havea minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six- 9 inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-7. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). 10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING \\O~i Notice of Public Hearing 198 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA08-0162 Applicant: Geoff Bonney, Bonney Architects Proposal: A Major Modification to reconstruct the exterior facade of an existing restaurant, Five and Ten Diner (approved Development Plan PA99-0476), to a bank, Arrowhead Credit Union Location: Generally located on the east side of Ynez Road approximately 500 feet south of Winchester at 26460 Ynez Road [APN 910-320-037] Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15301, Class 1, Existing Facilities) Case Planner: Betsy Lowrey Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: November 5, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at , or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. \ i \ PA08-0162 r \ jHs \ \ < 91 9 'S00 -0°n BCC / ~ N Notice of Public Hearing I I I ITEM 5 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: November 5, 2008 PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA08-0153, A Major Modification SUMMARY: Application to modify an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center originally entitled to construct a one-story 2,600 square foot expansion to be a two-story 6,532 square foot expansion (a total increase of 3,932 square feet), generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff Architects, Inc. General Plan Very Low Density Residential (VL) Designation: Zoning Designation: Very Low Density Residential (VL) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing Grace Presbyterian Church North: Vacant Land and existing large lot dwelling/Very Low Density Residential (VL) South: Existing large lot dwelling/Very Low Density Residential (VL) East: Vacant land and existing large lot dwelling/Very Low Density Residential (VL) West: Existing Calvary Baptist Church/Very Low Density Residential (VL) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 172,498 sq. ft. (net) existing n/a Lot Coverage: 10,572 sq. ft. existing 34,499 sq. ft./20% max allowable 6,532 sq. ft. proposed (17,104 sq. ft./10% total) Open Space: 158,579 sq. ft. proposed 120,748 sq. ft. minimum required Parking: 151 spaces existing 150 spaces minimum required i BACKGROUND SUMMARY On June 18, 2003, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA02-0257, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan for Grace Presbyterian Church located at the southwest corner of Calle Medusa and Nicholas Road. City Council approval was required in order to make findings to override the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) decision that a religious institutional use would be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Comprehensive Plan (which discourages auditoriums, schools, and stadiums within the Traffic Pattern Zone). On July 22, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 03-92 which, in addition to making the findings for a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan, made the required findings to override the ALUC and permitted a religious institutional use at this location. Since the proposed Major Modification does not modify the use; and proposes only to increase the entitled area for the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center from a 2,600 square foot expansion to a 6,532 square foot expansion, City Council approval is not required and Planning Commission approval is the appropriate approval body for this Major Modification application. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project was originally entitled to be constructed in two phases. Phase One was constructed as approved, and includes a 10,572 square foot Fellowship Hall/Worship Center (with administration and classroom areas) plus a temporary 2,880 square foot modular classroom. Phase Two was entitled to include a 2,600 square foot expansion of the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center, a 10,670 square foot sanctuary, and removal of the Phase One temporary 2,880 square foot modular classroom. The total square footage of both phases at project build- out is entitled to be approximately 23,800 square feet. The Major Modification is a proposal to expand the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center by 6,532 square feet rather than 2,600 square feet as previously entitled. The increase in the expansion of the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center will modify the building footprint from 2,600 square feet to 3,347 square feet and add a 3,185 square foot second floor. The total area increase for the proposed Major Modification is 3,932 square feet. While the project will add a second floor, the height of the proposed modification will not exceed the existing height of the church. Site Plan/Landscaping The proposed Major Modification will result in no changes to the originally approved Site Plan, and will not materially change the building footprint of the approved Development Plan. The net building footprint proposed by this modification will be increased by only 747 square feet over what was originally planned at build-out. In addition, upon completion of construction of the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center, a temporary modular classroom structure that exists on the premises will be removed. The project is conditioned to provide landscape construction plans in this area consistent with the existing surrounding landscape. All existing landscaping and hardscape will remain intact, including existing concrete which will remain as a pedestrian walkway surrounding the new addition. 2 The project conforms to all of the development standards as required by the Development Code for the Very Low Density Residential Zone, including lot coverage, setbacks and parking requirements for religious institutions. Parking Two onsite parking lots are fully constructed and no additional parking spaces will be required by this expansion. Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.24.040, the required number of spaces at project build-out is 150 spaces based upon a 450-seat sanctuary, and the existing parking provides a total of 151 parking spaces. This calculation is based on two assumptions as discussed in the original entitlement. First, the parents of the children attending the Sunday school will also be attending the on-site church service at the same time. Second, only one of the assembly areas will be used at any given time. Therefore, the parking calculations are based on the largest assembly area, which is the 450-seat sanctuary. Architecture The architectural design of the proposed expansion of the Fellowship Hall/Worship Center seamlessly integrates with the architecture of the existing church. The building form, materials, and colors match existing materials exactly. The proposed 3,185 square foot second floor expansion creates a varied roofline and visual interest while maintaining balance and proportion with the existing building and surrounding area. Its pitched roof, matching roof tiles and careful placement of windows coordinate well with the existing structure. The rear elevation of the second floor addition proposes a 14-foot pedestrian bridge which links the structure to the existing rear parking lot which is located at a higher elevation. This pedestrian access integrates the proposed expansion within its existing surroundings while improving accessibility from the parking lot to the church. A wrought iron metal railing will provide safety and will aesthetically enhance the pedestrian bridge. Conclusion Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.05.030, modifications to an approved development plan shall require the same findings as were made on the original approval. These findings are outlined below. Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Development Code and City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations and recommends that the Planning Commission approve PA08-0153, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on October 25, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has reviewed and approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the project on June 18, 2003 and by City Council on July 22, 2003, as Planning Application No. PA02-0257, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification application does not require the 3 preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Major Modification application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Major Modification application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. FINDINGS Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.05.030, modifications to an approved Development Plan shall require the same findings as were made on the original approval: The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable provisions of the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines. The site is properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinance. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in case of a need for emergency response to the site. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program for PA02-0257 Conditions of Approval for PA02-0257 Notice of Public Hearing 4 VICINITY MAP AERIAL MAP 14 p- i 14 • r~ i:t y -`-6C O _ may. 't '-5r14quo RO - , I p, " tiGAT1 R13 Ffak R~1. n 4 ~ ,R a -mgt 1 In i i r ~ I ~"C+J+1f~,4vN~R rx Nd„ M; n •C r.,,. r ~ - n J' j\ L r ~r r r r 1[mccr,t~n PLAN REDUCTIONS I 3 $ 5¢ A-i VLpVLpVLp g### $ a a g # ` sgul ;a c e a P a ~ l i . RPO t is eit : it Sc aka § s q¢S ~E'~ ~F€fi G ~4 y F. I S d I.' fie C R 5 R] 9Pa { I'avI a v I W D a r Ee MAP x 0 V~ n ge€ a sP ~ 6n I ~ } ! f' D C~" n n 0_ n :gar: P , 0 c 0 Ig 0 5pi MA Z ` I z a ~ ~ - I I i. • I fl 9 -mi M-A x Mo m $g °£g 'Foy a• "m-oF I D 5 e • GRACE PRESDTTERIMI CHURN c WORSHIP CENTER ADDITION E m M a r•Na .a~He. a•..Nr. y m n _ m - 5 _ I I I I; I I I I I a I {Tt 9~ I TTTTT i'i i_______-- i i - g z` TF I, II I A I! I FIIHIM I ` I' I III I I I I DO GMCEPRESBYTERIAN CHURH + Y 11 . , CE GCENTER AD DMO DITION wp.oew en. ! d ~ • . _ eecuu c~ nwcs~ o A N Z n m i 5W p°. ppppp?p= bee§e?e'.s 9. O ~ °Llm e e qq 4 -5 A O e'QQyP4@ R > A ~~g~f -ZI Fi F'. S Q~~s•srsy~ ~cpaa_p~ cb §a a®$ - x x Y k ~F akk .mn na y~ 9S tl 6 ®e~ rp FI ©g$x 0 01 ME . o o Sm ~m 0 0 0 0 0 0 om g~g _ pc a 0 A 0 _ ©gg Eli, mg_ I y B • GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURN c p WORSHIP CENTER ADDITION e. p,mr men p9 d w#n _ ~ ~.w.n eyi yV° Ftl P. lYn. Ixa Nx.l fJXmi. F4] 61 63-M]I tll 6i-Nl] Iu 0 0 n ! f ~i~114'itq 61t((~f E Ili s 4~ e - - + a I I ~ II I I I I I I I I I I I 6 I I I I I I _ w- ~ I I I I I I I I I I F'~'^ II . r~ r I II I I I a I I' I I I II I I II I• ~ II I. I II II I. I II I li j II° I I II I I I, I iff+ I li a II I ~ II r t~ II .m I II ~ III I I II I I• I II II I. I II II I - II II III I I II III I I II I I II I I I I I I I it ~°ir ~ ~ I I I I I I° I I s ill L____ I I I III 000000000 ~~g~ - a 5 ~ R a~ y i p GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHUM R WORSHIP CENTER DITION M wMa ..m.n'. a>wn am .de..s rr so n. rw nn x..a. rm..e nw n. m-w. ni wam rm _ A O A m D 0 y a ° ~ s a O m H ~ r m I < p y Z Z I. . O C Z O a .....I, C~ N A [El O o ~s 0 4 ~A Va EEII' ED e, . FE1 CD CCU m . m 1ID W r r, a 8 "A 0000 0 00 0 =N PH Willi pyQa ~~a~$~I~jbR n G x N a '"yam s ~~g~$53 ~~"~5 O a ~ ~ 6g s~9 . . _ _.__r . . r.. >S a No- GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURH r~~10'~ °'A1O PoMp~ ¢ 9 WORSHIP CENTER ADDITION ° ~ a r neiau «~uwnu®i i a s " za g,a3$? 6F"ga a^m a'ao~ aaaa $a a€^$ °€®cg=e€€ °a 8€ g : e 23l°~ a3D $ 1~: aalE€ y g~ 0 ® 9e°^ sF 8 F5a $:"5gga~€" ; ~c° c1FS s€ 8 a c "Ps F g$$ W R$8"~a pp W `ygg 1a - ~1% €4 -13 F€=`444s 4 1ZHo »W 8 N m o N 2a+W ae8ae 3 3 9g 3 2°,°Sn'i 3 aR iH1 R W°:: ~8gaaae F' a€ 'a g" g° n ~c~e ~ as $e °ahh;. 0s la ga W a g Rge^ 'W M. RaSaaga a 9$ e a, q 6 ' g§5 3R~§ P, . P s° §ae, W°WWW €a' a-$a^ 'go e g n_ ^ ^a €g oEse> ^Wp . A a"§ ' a.,p ~=3e .3 E 3- a:o 85•' A n $a ~e a a =6• e3a~9oa° 9 5,14 a7R 6 Wta a s€^ t tg W .ac W ; R eF Z go sa€ ~9€ a $ =a BI a c ^ R y ~a~ W€ $ c° 5.pyp g^ a R 6 t2 m a~ •R a a°" W3W p Ck° 4°° •B W"^_' W ~~~99 ~~°z F 525°WI Say a8 ° e a§ ag~2: `aS 3has,° •RS 3 °R~M w § 'p a° gse 3 § ;ge. W °a '$1§° lay ~ as = ,a~` z ;ev a. g s a. a:^ F a @@5. IF oa 3 g,R, g •3^ ~a~ W @a a aeg a $eW $ $ a; W e~ ®c°a~e a a i~ € .E Vigo y~~~~ f `e z a E {s 41 HIM 2 E _ sRR ;v a€§mf gag 3 5 a ~P ~W§4 € € €€a i ; E 5° ~~s $9e e s _ . £ a `ke € a$ a-F.a s FR' Re- i~E ~ im $saf9g3&Ys=$a-""-gds= o , - P Egg $_Ofi:.E-.gEEzfr $$frF ~ a eta as ea a a e33 F a c z€^ -x::86" 9c .*_:::g € $ 5~ . g § E$~ 8~ c$ g° P pi a§a8 ~ ~ s ~ € ec"v^..a =.a,°~ Ea ^ "s°~ ~ e ~ W CW3 a: xa"S a W° a^$ eg a._^€a$aa; s $ F 0 a, eWa $ qs ps~ 'e_"a P.aRE RB.f a3::. °z 3 as g p °B e $F , W$ca3^ 9~e °€R 'axe € 9 ep AN $aa ^'s `s~• $a€ gR.'s~ N! e "a$_..~_? 5F6 €°edF, 's a aJ€' .3"3•~p •~aa W$~ °ea €=S °k 8 5' " $g W eF"a " c ~a7, y @e9 s ° s€aa$ a$"$= ~a5 S W, E08 4aaS tl°": ~F WW. a, A W 39 8 -`_'6 C^e q4.$ o 8'F°~C B aaaa.y ]g R22 $5~ g a: cg-a" € C R .Aura @ @a~°_ €583 sae 2~ c, R, F 8 F a= e2-Fk'''~ i $$~s~,a 3a• Fa°§3 08° Z3 8 183 s ~§Ws dREs~ ag~~ $8 W a s§° ~ a e 541 $@€~e 'F Q~Ey eg;~° W°~.R~ ~oE. Ra F~e €@ e ~ ~ a ~ GfG fG: GGGG P CG GGp 5~° b' €@,s $ € ~ ~J Y \ 1 g d Tn 4 Rc ~t ~ Rg z ~ ~V1 CD C _ a •d_ _6° gQgQ hC II. _ R ^ Gaa a So I C ~ - O ~ L^^-I _ 6 - MCA €N ~ ~ 41 ~ 9 3 a E° _ u 4 6rr-V I~ ° q.A m\ a: a _ 1M l- ° I. ~ ~ E' gam, a A C R C6 ~5 R ~~..o^,C` aP~ipa 00 ~ P ~ Y°~ 38vyo ~R`+'E IC °€°sFR °g ' P8s„`g z oN a"aSa.. =Regg ?~g3 v 6a`: ts:'e cC a rs^rrn°'°e ~ -m-U' im- 45-4 y 8 §°SI °`y F [LLL G^.444444 6G: GGGG[€ a o A e o a i °ee"Ee:ep~x:e:`ee$°§E:See:ez€~.=~ a . ....zrrxxrxxx.xxzxxxxixxxxxsrrrx_xa^ w°p > ,1-. sa-sk'.'•ia5c S°-as aki-•ea. :a~: _ I m I r b x9 x88"~"•"-66 e6s2.5 f 2• W M &888'x ".x:88E:88t Y. 03 m~ g..ax. 8 t•8 A n m I •..Bo8Ct E88 BBi Sao a' 3 H Ii 4 E - 6 14 see aaaagk'aa§eak°qq~' 3 # I ( C°8 °a4 8 i ' Oil 1111111111121 66 iC i V ~ R F ~ e~ : IsC E ~ 1 " I I AC ZJ s . Y tlll NO r II I Z III t~ , II D s I i II .s..:~. O C7 - I Z H F eli E P 4 ;1 N - ~ t r ~~a.- li tE _Ii J O 1 i f 1 - 8'n 1 r a a bw s o.. 3 { H X t a" t E ?P P re ~-mm e ^ I.i ^ n p" FT a r a CJ C I u C I _ s ~ ➢ n ~ Z r Z N n ~ I N R Zn S V S~ I I A 1 °v c R i a ~ o 5 a , ~ a A o k F P a»ll e R N ; o m 'qs@!'s='s=avd eR F° A:F~ .A Pik J~ w \ n W o ~~52=5 1 rc VF t'A'. ~F iP m I I k ~I I n~ I ~ v =s sAI~ I I F ~y .FF J. a. - R ~ A~i 'p ° I S I I s F €EFpe o'A 'J. VJa ,t L{`JAF z€ F e: - o- € a _ y I ®q a RgPPg pp(F ^ Y~ R^ £ S v a I ` F// RR ~ 1 CFFN ~'iy FY.y € e g5 k~ O € ~ ~ .y I ilk ~ 523 ~ 14~ } ' ygg€a"y°s°saygy3a€esz~ R` R F ~A 6R~ pCi J) F Tie ~ BS wJ , na u JiEA JaA em: o v 5 1 .a'I4~ ~E~ 6n i F°' a 3 E t 9 as o d All 1 OEM 00 °4 SEE SW NO 4! JI C p - •y~ ia'sa ,q FL 'aer ~S ZOD (N A M ..F;2 R'~"g ~gs~xo arp ' 9N SI® 'i- .C .:~I Rye 2 wa^ ;NH F[ns =v g : x'SN N j. w ~ S I Ii a p F sl 'z .Z ~3 C,Z :g 8 ^ I' 4 Re SEE SHT. NO. •S Y A t ff. I A4 ~ ,Y ~ y? I S RE C @: ni~ 9 ¢»-1-r~-~ -r r . t yP 9^ I 05 R~ I d ° I I I 1 o-„ 1 ~ F4n,. ~ ' u6z 1 ~y Fie - I' 1 1 1 1 I,=,1 1 1 1 1 1 g ~ f~-7 I I I ~ I I I~ I ell '4 ~ nb I I 1 i~ .Y 'a• ~ I \j` 4 I I I I y I I m I I I I I o _ • ~5 n S o vN Z z N P A -J f t. R 3e PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0153, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO MODIFY AN EXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALLIWORSHIP CENTER ORIGINALLY ENTITLED TO CONSTRUCT A ONE-STORY 2,600 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO BE A TWO-STORY 6,532 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION (A TOTAL INCREASE OF 3,932 SQUARE FEET), GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS AND CALLE MEDUSA AT 31143 NICOLAS ROAD (APN 957-140-010) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 18, 2003, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of Planning Application No. PA07-0257, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases totaling 23,770 square feet. B. On June 22, 2003, the City Council approved Planning Application No. PA07-0257, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases totaling 23,770 square feet. C. On July 7, 2008, Reverend Jerry Hangen, filed Planning Application No. PA08-0153, a Major Modification Application to modify an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center originally entitled to construct a one-story 2,600 square foot expansion to be a two-story 6,532 square foot expansion (a total increase of 3,932 square feet), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. D. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on November 5, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PA08-0153 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. 2 Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modifications to an approved Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable provisions of the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines; The site is properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinance. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA08-0153, a Major Modification Application to construct a 6,532 square foot two-story worship center attached to an existing sanctuary, generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road (APN 957-140-010): A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Major Modification application. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission on June 18, 2003 and City Council on July 22, 2003, as Planning Application No. PA02-0257, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Major Modification application does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Major Modification application does not involve significant new effects, does not change the baseline environmental conditions, and does not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Major Modification application will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Major Modification application are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Major Modification application, and no additional environmental documentation is required. 3 Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA08-0153, a Major Modification Application to modify an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center originally entitled to construct a one- story 2,600 square foot expansion to be a two-story 6,532 square foot expansion (a total increase of 3,932 square feet), generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road (APN 957-140-010), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. a Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of November 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of November 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary 5 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: i EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA08-0153 Project Description: A Major Modification Application to modify an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center originally entitled to construct a one-story 2,600 square foot expansion to be a two-story 6,532 square foot expansion (a total increase of 3,932 square feet) Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-140-010 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: N/A TUMF Category: Service Commercial Approval Date: November 5, 2008 Expiration Date: November 5, 2010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project Pi The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($1,940.75) which includes the One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Six Dollar and Seventy-Five Cent ($1,876.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the previously approved Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. Pi The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements Pi The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the 3 City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within Planning Application No. PA02-0257, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL-8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL-9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL-12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. 4 PL-13. All materials and colors shall match existing building: MATERIAL COLOR Roof Eagle Heirloom "Seaboard Quarry" Bennington Blend SHE9700 Exterior Stucco - Main Body Frazee 8640W Creative White Exterior Stucco - Accent Frazee 8644M Seal Beach Exterior Plaster - Trim and Gutters Frazee 8645D Greylock Window Frames Clear Anodized Glazing Solar Grey PL-14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. PL-15. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved the Director of Planning. PL-16. The applicant shall comply with Conditions of Approval for PA07-0257, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-17. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL-18. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. PL-19. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at anytime during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." 5 Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-20. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department for the area where the temporary module trailer will be removed. These plans shall coordinate with the existing landscaping and shall be consistent with the Development Code. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-21. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planterto be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL-22. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Two landscape site inspections are required: One inspection is required prior to irrigation line trenches being closed for inspection of the irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." PL-23. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-24. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan), and the locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the Tentative Map. PL-25. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-26. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/ owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-27. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. PL-28. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the 6 screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-29. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-30. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. PL-31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-32. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning,.the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-33. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities maybe towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." 7 PL-34. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL-35. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/information B-1. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-5. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B-6. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-7. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-8. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-9. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-10. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21, specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. 8 B-11. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. At Plan Review Submittal B-12. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-13. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B-14. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-15. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-16. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-17. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information CS-1. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. CS-2. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) CS-3. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 9 F-2. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building constriction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-3. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-4. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-5. If making any changes to the existing underground the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and Chapter 5, Section 501.3). F-6. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-7. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-8. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E. F-9. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). 10 F-10. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). F-11. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. PW-3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW-4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW-5. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-6. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW-7. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW-8. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW-9. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. PW-10. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW-11. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW-12. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW-13. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-14. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW-15. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. PW-16. The developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-17. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. 12 c. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through under sidewalk drains. PW-18. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW-19. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW-20. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-21. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW-22. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW-23. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-24. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-25. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 13 INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (PA02-0257) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title Planning Application Nos. 02-0257 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Grace Presbyterian Church Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Saied Naaseh, Senior Planner 909 694-6400 Project Location Generally located Southwest Corner Of Calle Medusa And Nicholas Road APN 957-140-010). Project Sponsor's Name and Address Russell Rumansoff Herron & Rumansoff Architects 530 St. Johns Place Hemet, CA 92543 General Plan Designation Very Low Dens' residential VL Zoning Very Low Densi residential VL Description of Project To construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases, Phase 1 includes a 10,500 square foot fellowship hall with administration and classroom areas and a 2,880 square feet modular classroom building totaling 13,380 square feet; Phase 2 includes a 10,670 square foot, 450 seat church sanctuary, youth room, with an additional 2,600 square feet of classroom area and removal of the modular classroom building totaling 13,270 square feet; the total square footage of the fellowship hall and the sanctuary buildings for the project at build out is 23,770. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting North: Low Medium Density Residential (Single Family Homes) East: Low Medium Density Residential (Single Family Homes) South: Low Medium Density Residential (Single Family Homes) West: Low Medium Density Residential (Single Family Homes Other public agencies whose approval None it required RAC U PN2002t02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnitial Study.dcc 1 Vicinity Ma k3 ELi 1 `MM Pro ect Si*- €W VIM= I RAC U Pt2002102-0257 Grace Presbyterian Church\lnitial Study.chu n Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources A ricultural Resources Population and Housing Noise Air Quali Population and Housing Biological Resources, Water Public-Services Cultural Resources Recreation Geologic Problems Trans ortation/Traffic Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems H drolo and Water Quali Land Use Planning None Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a 'potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated.' An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. May 27.2003 Signature Date _Saied Naaseh. Senior Planner City of Temecula Printed name For RIC U Pt2002M-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchVnitW Study.dac 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Rotenaally, ;Sigft flcant W ith, ltli Less Tian a Sipruhcarrc fA4ogaaony _ txSlgnnflce. N_y~ ~x Issues and Supporting Information sources :I Ly Ira ateY 1 „1 cta" d ~I a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or. X quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which X would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: t.a. No Impact. The existing property has not been identified as a scenic vista in the City of Temecula's General Plan. 1.b. No Impact. Nicolas Road and Calle Medusa are not designated as scenic resources nor is the site within the view of a state scenic highway. As a consequence, no significant impact to scenic resources will result from the proposed project or future development of the site. t.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project will be located adjacent to future single-family units to the south of the project site. Due to the proposed natural undisturbed open space to the south of the site the impact to the visual character of the area is insignificant. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will produce a new source of substantial light and glare. All light and glare has the potential to impact the Mount Palomar Observatory. Due to proximity to residential uses, the project also has a potential to create significant light and glare impacts onsite or impacting the surrounding area and uses. The project will be conditioned to comply with the County's Ordinance 655 requirements. The project as conditioned will result in a less than significant impact. 2. Agricultural Resources. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Leas Than.. Potentially Slgrofieant With less TTfa'n} Significant Migga6ori SWnifeait! No Issues ands onln Informagon Sourm I ct Inco orated,.:1 A "ct «I aa..•` a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland X of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? RAC U P12"02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Churchkinitial Study.doc b. Conflict with the existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X Williamson Act contract? C. Involve other changes in the existing environment, which X due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: 2a.-c. No Impact. The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the historic past the site has not been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses. Therefore, there is no significant impact related to this issue. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable quality management. or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: l{~ ae 4 -"a',ExLes9 . a~«•,yyy~,~& y` P 0 - S n1wM less Tlgm .Issues §rq Su AppoiMg.lnfoim^ aSeulce54#°c., ~grWya ✓ F` ~t`ed, iO~rM a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X to an existing or projected air quality violation? C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X of people? Comments: 3.a, b. less Than Significant Impact. The project is consistent with the General Plan and the proposed project will comply with State and Federal air quality standards. As a consequence, a less than significant is anticipated as a result of this project. 3.c. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed site has been graded previously, which will eliminate the need for significant grading and excavation. As a consequence a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact As proposed the project will not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrators as is consistent with the General Plan. As a consequence a less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 3.e. Less Than Significant With Mitigation. The project may create objectionable odors during the construction phase of the project. These impacts will be short in duration and are not considered significant over the long term. The project shall comply with the environmental standards as detailed in the Development Code for commercial development. The proposed project has sited a large-scale RAC U PQW2102-0257 Grace Presbyterian Churchkinitial Study.doc S grocery store in close proximity to single-family residences to the south and east. A large-scale grocery store has the potential to generate objectionable odors that may affect the single-family residences. The food waste generated and disposed of at the rear of the proposed store may create objectionable odors for the adjacent homes. Therefore, the following mitigation measures will be implemented. REQUIRED MITIGATION MEASURES 1. The project will be required to have daily trash pickups that will eliminate any potential objectionable odors. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: ~ 4~ tY~ ~ 's T>`gar m°` a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or X through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected X wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filing, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? I. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: 4.a-e. No Impact. The General Plan does not designate the project site as a potentially sensitive habitat site. The site is outside the habitat area identified for the Quino Checkerspot Butterfly and does not contain wetlands as defined by the Clean Water Act. The site has been rough graded previously into a developable commercial pad. There is no anticipated biological impact associated with this project. 41 No Impact. The project site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee Area. The project will be conditioned to comply with provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation), which requires payment of the Stephens Kangaroo Rat fee. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. RAG U P12002\02.0257 Grace Presbyterian ChureNnitial Study.doc e 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: z w k y '~d ~fY£Cent~.r.Ri ~~.."~Ot1b"~ ki o- r5k~!~2M~ 3aSNO~1l= Issues and S .iniornlatlf!lYSeereea. ....+.~z ...ral act.1> -InCO ted. a a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? C. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: 5.a. No Impact. The subject site does not meet the criteria of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5 of the California Environmental Quality Act. 5.b-d. Less Than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed buildings will occur on land that has been previously graded. Due to previous land disturbance, it is unlikely that cultural resources remain on this site. Additionally, neither the City of Temecula General Plan Environmental Impact Report nor the City's General Plan identifies this project site as an area of significant archeological; however, it does show it as a potentially significant paleontological area. Therefore, the project will be conditioned have a paleontologistlarchaeologist or representative present that shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt grading activity to allow recovery of fossils. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? Less Than. POtentiauy sig kaniWith Lesa:than piggicaat Mitigation Sprcficant rN0, Issues and Supporting Information Sources "Pa"` 1 C01p018tl' i"Pa' tmaaa'°<- a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial X adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involvin : i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on X the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. P c.ii Strong seismic round shaking? X iii Seismic-related round failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B X of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?. e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems RAC U PXM202-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchVnitial Study.doc 6.' GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project? x: •y eE l e3s nan . ..2ti+ r:. mss-. ~^.d§£sx?'~"'`~'c-,'.~'~, *ry°SiQrYllcanl -•Ir~para~.tl:A 51° Im~p"eacS.. . Issuesand,Su " rtin'jlnformationSouces where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 6.a.i, ii, iii. Less Than Significant Impact. The project may have a significant impact on people involving seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (including liquefaction and subsidence of the land) and expansive soils, and will have a less than significant impact to erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill. The project is located in Southern California, an area that is seismically active. Any potentially significant impacts will be reduced to a less than significant impact and conditioned to conform to Uniform Building Code standards. Further, standard practices will be followed for grading and compaction to reduce these impacts to insignificant levels. After the incorporation of these elements, no significant impacts are anticipated. 6.a.iv, No Impact. The project will not expose people to landslides or mudflows. The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 6.b.c. Less Than Significant Impact Potential impacts will be mitigated by conditions of approval to comply with State of California Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone development criteria and construction in accordance with the Uniform Building Code standards. Standard practices for compaction of the soil will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure (including liquefaction), erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill and expansive soils. Erosion control techniques will be included as a condition of approval for development projects at the site. Potential unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill will be mitigated through the use of proper compaction of the soils and landscaping. 6.d. Less Than Significant Impact. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction, consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Further, the project will be conditioned to provide soil reports prior to grading and recommendations contained in this report are complied with during construction. Standard practices for the compaction of the soil will serve to mitigate any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction, subsidence and expansive soils. 6.e. No Impact. Septic sewage disposal systems are not proposed for this project. The project is connected to the existing public sewer system; therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: ~ :rw~ k- ~sSlpiufir n~ GGE9?ibn 't3 gNfwrc ,,Mjn'IJ0 Issues irWS - Informatldn Sources;; T.'.s_ a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? RAC U M002t02-0257 Grace Presbylerian ChurchUniliel Study.doc b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or X. acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of X hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? I. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: 7.a. No Impact. The project will result in a less than significant impact in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard. The project will be reviewed for compliance with all applicable health laws during the plan check stage. No permits will be issued unless the project is found to be consistent with these applicable laws. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.b. No Impact. The project will result in a less than significant impact due to risk of explosion, or the release of any hazardous substances in the event of accident or upset conditions. The Fire Department reviewed this project according to the information provide by the applicant and found that there should be minimal hazards if designed, built, and used according to the submitted plans. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.c. No Impact. This project site is not located within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. No impact is anticipated. 7.d. No Impact. This project site is not, nor is it located near, a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 that would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.e. No Impact. The project site is located within the French Valley airport influence area. The site is located 9,500-10,500 feet southeast of the south end of the runway and is within the Traffic Pattern Zone which discourages auditorium, schools, and stadiums. The ALUC has reviewed the project and found it to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. The noise impacts of the airport can be mitigated since the project is outside the 55 CNEL and interior noises will achieve General Plan's 50 CNEL requirement with conventional construction. In addition, the height of the structures complies with the Part 77 height requirements. The applicant does not enjoy privileges to RAC U P%200202-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChmhUnitial S"Acc own alternative sites and the ALUC's recommendation to move the structures 200' south is not feasible. PUC 21774.5 (d) per permits the City to override the ALUC's decision. With the ALUC's proposed conditions of approval, no significant impacts will result from this proposal. 71 No Impact. The project site is not located within two miles of a private airstrip. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal. 7.g, No Impact. The project will take access from maintained public streets and will therefore not impede emergency response or evacuation plans. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 7.h. No Impact. The project will not result in an increase to fire hazard in an area with flammable brush, grass, or trees. The project is a commercial village surrounded by single-family residences. In the development of the site the applicant will be eliminating existing potentially flammable brush. The project is not located within or proximate to a fire hazard area. No impacts are anticipated. 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: z r >aaa' i r ~?~'k' "`y5Y # k.eecardVi px fi h"' Man 4N iCant Wd h a A S]h2nh ire ry ~ie Yx's NOPor' s ru"'zv'~>+-n.£ f °3 31gMhCM ,t.11~sp#d ha~ . :Issues erid SUpportlrg lnlormadpn urcw"' t m Impact~In„yorporate SP ';t Mpac_f'~z a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in floodin on- or off-site? e. Create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the X capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? I. Otherwise substantial) degrade water quality9 X g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures, X which would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j. Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X RAC U P\2002W2-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnitial Study.doc Comments: 8.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level that is less than significant. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 8.b.f. Less Than Significant Impact The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters or aquifer volume. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 8.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation and/or flooding on- or off-site. Some changes to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change, potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances are required for the project to safely and adequately handle runoff that is created. As designed the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on the existing facilities. 8.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The project is not anticipated to create or contribute runoff water, which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project is conditioned to accommodate the drainage created as a result of the development of the subject site. In addition, the project is conditioned so that the drainage will not impact surrounding properties. A less than significant impact is associated with this project. 8.g. No Impact. This project represents a development plan for a commercial user within an area zoned for commercial uses. No residential property is affected; no impact is associated with this project. 8.h. No Impact The project will have no impact on people or property to water related hazards such as flooding because the project site is located outside of the 100-year floodway as identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (Figure 7-3) and the Flood Insurance Rate Map Community-Panel Number 06024514500. No potential for exposure to significant flood hazards will occur from developing the project site as proposed. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 8.i.j. No Impact. The project site is not subject to inundation by sieche, tsunami, or mudflow, as these events are not known to happen in this region. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 9. Land Use and Planning. Would the project: `n tess7han.~.~s ,m wnn awenna~ry sipNrcam ,M Bess man, » .'t`~" f:'i` r' r`'? gSiyn~Bcant~7^- MN9aHon.)c;; +"SWnil~oanl'a xNo ' , ISSUesaed S"..: InlBanatlon:Soulmst~A.e._o,"3.:~ Y ~t €::«Irrco tetl^._a v.fl.l a. Ph sicall divide an established commun' X b. Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy, or X RAC U P1 OO=-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnilial Study.dx regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ,X natural community conservation plan? Comments: 9.a. No Impact. The project site is an infill residential parcel surrounded by a church site, a vacant single- family parcel, and two streets. The site design has made it compatible with adjacent uses.. A permanent open space lot buffers the Single Family parcel to the south. Therefore, no impacts as a result of this project are anticipated. 9.b. No Impact. The project as proposed is consistent with the General Plan land use of Community Commercial and is consistent with the Margarita Village Specific Plan. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the fee area for the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat (SKR) Long-Term Habitat Conservation Plan. All development within this fee area Is required to pay a one-time mitigation fee. As a consequence, a less than significant impact is anticipated. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Ual Sbruficanl k ~hniMU to Hh . xiLSpNRcanl " r'NO" Issues Support Nbrmatlon Sources „'.t»"'. .xlm actg. ni ^:.Elnco` ted$~ Palm a,I a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important X mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 10.a.b. No Impact. The project will not result in the loss of available, known mineral resources or in the loss of an available, locally important mineral resource recovery site. The State Geologist has classified the City of Temecula a classification of MRZ-3a, containing areas of sedimentary deposits, which have the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, it has been determined that this area contains no deposits of significant economic value based upon available data in a report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area. Riverside County, California. Special Report 165, prepared in accordance with the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) of 1975. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: PotenUl Significant Wit la'swTfian 9 _ Significant Mitigatbn Signlflcain NO . " Issues and Supporting Inla ation Sources Impact 1n rated lm 6 adt Impact a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in X excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? RAC U P12002=-=7 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnitial Sh*.doc 12 b. • Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X roundborne vibration or roundborne noise levels? C. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? I. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: 11.a.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The City of Temecula's General Plan required a 5o0 CNEL interior noise level for public institutional uses. Through conventional construction this level can be achieved. Therefore, no significant noise impacts are anticipated. 11.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The uses conducted by the project are not activities that would expose persons to or generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels. Although there will be an increase in ground borne vibration and noise during grading and construction, these will be of a temporary and short duration. Due to the limited nature of this exposure and by maintaining compliance with the City Noise Ordinance there will be a less than significant impacts. 11.d. Less Than Significant Impact The project may result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However, this source of noise from construction of the project will be of short duration and therefore would not be considered significant. Furthermore, construction activity will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity. A less than significant impact would be anticipated. 11.e.f. No Impact This project is not within two miles of a private airstrip, therefore, the users of the site will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an airport. Consequently no impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: y5 yz3Potmnla xg; Sgyufic2rltyWith `Less7tian' DY v $3 '+m3...ifssafiry=9ztr?a~~`. d ' '•ia . S~4nlfic°N„}'~,iMNpatP Si9N(t. t.,. No tvn ~,>ISSUes ard5 n Jrdonnatlon Sources Im' ~Y:trICQ r.- a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other Infrastructure)? b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? RAC U Pt200202-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchVnitial Study.doc Comments: 12.a.b.c. No Impact. The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly or indirectly. The project site is a residential in-fill site surrounded by single-family parcels and a church. The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the site is developed with as a church. The project will neither displace housing nor people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result In a need for new or altered Government (services in any of the following areas: PY AFA j AlF KN T'C'3 Ysk>i y,,,,.ye n~ L ~rdtall 'Sgrul~entWNl~tn Mess Thant 1'x^1 sF..y` S" sk''r„ r _nlrlCaft iSason 4 s r No, . 11 Issues and Su r9 .Iniormasdh Sources.. n;:«.~,,.,,_~ s?.;,..z.. I, I°~'orated„ a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X impacts associates with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: b. Fire protection? X C. Police protection? X d. Schools? X e. Parks? X f. Other public facilities? X Comments: 13.a.b.c.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The project will incrementally increase the need for some services. However, the project will contribute its fair share through City Development Impact Fees to be used to provide public facilities. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 13.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered school facilities. The project will not cause significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 13.f. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or result in a need for new or altered public facilities. The Rancho California Water District and the Riverside Department of Environmental Health have been made aware of this project. A condition of approval has been placed on this project that will require the proponent to obtain 'Will Serve" letters from all of the public utilities agencies. Service is currently provided for the surrounding residential homes, so extending service to this site is probable, which would result in less than significant impacts as a result of the project. R:IC U P12002=-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnitial Study.doc 14. RECREATION. Would the project: r_ t _'mw,~47.r~&a w'~a` 3 d Potential a.,cTCesS;Tlmlig;.,fi' af~~acr'~,~,?: x~ .rfa~r ti, IY "£S(9,n.1x11,t,a.,`N".~YMI' "'~n~fitaM ~(y~`5 ...ISSUes.and;S IMmmation SOUrcGS.,m mcaa-+a+.tua,v basin&o:rlm d~:,~, -1gW,x:< a cam: tY.f a. Would the project increase the use of existing X neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require X the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: 14.a.b. No Impact. The project is a commercial project that is relatively small in scale. The anticipated need to increase the neighborhood or regional parks or other recreational facilities as a result of this project is unlikely. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: _ < a z Mess Than. ~ ;=f, s~"SY~a+. i"'?'~f~ +oFotenhally _SIgnwM/Nh~'.?' le£q; `t% ` s "..'IlceMe ' Maipa n?"a `~GPfiTi'~M~`No >t. Issues endSU i 'IMOrriration Sources , " .tin 4 . x Into frb , ,u.,tm c • }k..lm a. Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in X relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads or congestion at intersections? b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of X service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either X an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safe risks? d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature X (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e. g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emer enc access? X f. Result in inadequate parking capacity?. X g. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs X supporting aftemative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: 15.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact The project site is currently zoned Very Low Density Residential, which is also the land use assumed in the City's Circulation Element of the General Plan. The project is consistent with General Plan goals and polices. The proposed project is not anticipated to cause significant impacts to the existing traffic system within the City of Temecula. Additionally, the City's Traffic Engineer reviewed the cumulative impacts during the approval process and has determined that the project's traffic impacts warrant no further study or mitigations. RAC U M200402-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchVniHal Study.doc is 15.c.d.No Impact. The proposed development of this property will not result in a change in air traffic patterns by increasing the traffic levels in the vicinity. The site is within the French Valley Airport's flight overlay district; however, conditions of approval have been recommended by the ALUC to mitigate these impacts. The design of the project will not pose a threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the people utilizing the roads in the vicinity of the project because there are no sharp curves or dangerous intersections proposed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.e. No Impact. The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or access to nearby uses. The project, as designed, complies with current City standards and has adequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.1. No Impact. The proposed development complies with the City's Development Code parking requirements for commercial uses. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 15.g. No Impact. The project site is located on a road that has access to public transportation. The project as proposed does not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Because the project does not propose to significantly increase its employee base, alternative transportation programs specifically designed for this project are not necessary. 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: Loss Than Polentlally I SgraFicant Wiih a l.esa Than '~~..M1aw~. si{pdHCant MingaM1On.- Sigivrrant4 +•*I#o:; Issues and Supporting Information Sources I 6t Into - ieleE'. I- ' off a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C. Require or result in the construction of new storm water X drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? I. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and X regulations related to solid waste? Comments: 16.a.b.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. However, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan RAC U P1200202-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChureNnitial Study.doc would not significantly impact wastewater services" Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.c. No Impact The amount of runoff from the project is not anticipated to be any greater than what was anticipated by construction of the site. Consequently, construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities is not anticipated. 16.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor require expanded water entitlements. The project will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39).' The FEIR further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 16.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. i+ kI?oienUailyb` :'.~.Siijiigant With4 ,Less hano,T M .SlgrufsaM MMGa4on:. r5 glgnl~cant"'Y^+.c, Nina. Issues and Su rU -Intusnetion Sources < r ~J act e,.rrii'- cT: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality X of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually X limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects? C. Does the project have environmental effects, which will X cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direct) or indirectly? Comments: 17.a. No Impact. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment on site or in the vicinity of the project. The site lies within an existing residential area with a church use adjecant to it. The project will not substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife because the site has been previously graded. No historic resources are anticipated to be impacted because grading has already occurred on the site. 17.b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The cumulative effects from the project are significant but they are being mitigated to less than significant levels with the incorporated mitigation. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding developments were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation RAC U P2W2\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurehVniBal S".doc measures in place, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, the cumulative impacts related to the future development will not have a significant impact. 17.c. Less Than Significant Impact The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The commercial component will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code, and the General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEGA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a. Earlier anal ses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where the are available for review. b. Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed b mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C. Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,' describe the mitigation measures, which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which the address site-specific conditions for the roject. Comments: 18.a. There were no earlier analyses specifically related to this project site. The City's General Plan and Final Environment Impact Report and a number of special studies (listed under Sources) were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study 18.b. There were no earlier impacts, which affected this project. 18.c. The mitigation measures are addressed in the Initial Study. RAC U Pt2002\02.0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchUnitial Study.doc is SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan, adopted November 9, 1993. 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report, adopted July 2, 1993 3. ALUC Staff Report Dated August 15, 2002 i RAC U P200=2-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchVnidal Shdly.doc 19 Mitigation Monitoring Program Project Description: Planning Application Nos. 02-0257 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit)- Grace Presbyterian Church Location: Generally located Southwest Comer Of Calle Medusa And Nicholas Road (APN 957- 140-010). Applicant: Russell Rumansoff Herron & Rumansoff Architects 530 St. Johns Place Hemet, CA 92543 Cultural Resources General Impact: Potential impact to paleontological resources. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide a paleontologist present at the time of grading. Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the Grading Plan review process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department Hazards and Hazardous Material General Impact: Site is within the TPZ for the French Valley Airport. Mitigation Measures: See Attached List from ALUC. Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure prior to the issuance of Building Permits and occupancy permit. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of Building Permit and occupancy permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department R:\C U P12002102.0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchWidgetlon Monitoring Program.doc Mitigation Monitoring Program Project Description: Planning Application Nos. 02-0257 (Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit)- Grace Presbyterian Church Location: Generally located Southwest Comer Of Cate Medusa And Nicholas Road (APN 957- 140-010). Applicant: Russell Rumansoff Herron & Rumansoff Architects 530 St. Johns Place Hemet, CA 92543 Cultural Resources General Impact: Potential impact to paleontological resources. Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall be required to provide a paleontologist present at the time of grading. Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the Grading Plan review process. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department Hazards and Hazardous Material General Impact: Site is within the TPZ for the French Valley Airport. Mitigation Measures: See Attached List from ALUC. Specific Process: Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure prior to the issuance of Building Permits and occupancy permit. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to the issuance of Building Permit and occupancy permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department RAC U P\2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchWitigation Monitoring Program.doc 1 -~BIYEF.BID f1 n 0 0 o w r I \ f J AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY A ecolioMIC usvm.or~+r a e N October 18, 2002 ) I) a OCT 2 5 2002 D CHM j wukmc*b City of Temecula, Planning Dept. P.O. Box 9033 vmEcKou" Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Men Graff Attn: Matthew Harris COtlNSSp"ER$ RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Paul BOO File No.: FV-02-108 Alamo Yaby Related File: PA-02-0257 Wul & YOr P^^ Dmd Dear Applicant: Me suphm . R"Isme On October 17, 2002, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), found ftpTmay the above project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French UNHwet Valley Airport. If the City should wish to override the Commission as per PUC 21774.5(d) 6.pr ft it should be subject to the following conditions: CNy Of Tmwaa s STAFF 1. Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to final KOMD.Down issuance of any permit, Eam"DYedor AI.CP., AAAE si Room ft 2. Incorporate noise attenuation measure into any building construction to Wva*CA925X ensure interior noise levels are at or below 45-decibel levels. retry~sslmaosol 3. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). 4. No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: (a) Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following' takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. (b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. Page 2 October 18, 2002 (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, orwhich may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Should you have any questions regarding this action, please contact me at (909) 351- 0700. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COLIN AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION Kai . Downs, A.I.C.P., A.A.A.E. Ex cutive Director KDD:jg cc: ALUC Staff Grace Presbyterian Church F:4hamMDCCMWIRPCRTSW.UCIFY-02.108.LTR.doe CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PA02-0257) EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA02-0257 Conditional Use Permit/ Development Plan Project Description: To construct, establish and operate a church facility in two phases, Phase 1 Includes a 10,500 square foot- fellowship hall with administration and classroom areas and a 2,880 square feet modular classroom building totaling 13,380 square feet; Phase 2 includes a 10,670 square foot, 450 seat church sanctuary, youth room, with an additional 2,600 square feet of classroom area and removal of the modular classroom building totaling 13,270 square feet; the total square footage of the fellowship hall and the sanctuary buildings. for the project at build out Is 23,770; to override the Airport Land Use Commission decision that determined the proposed use to be inconsistent with the French Valley Airport Land Use Plan. Development Impact Fee Category: Exempt Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-140-010 Approval Date: June 18, 2003 Expiration Date: June 18, 2005 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Three Hundred Twenty-Eight Dollars ($1,328.00) which includes the One Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollar ($1,250.00) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty Four Dollars ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of-Determination-for-the -Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a) and Califomia 'Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. RAC U P\2002\020257 Grace Presbyterian Cb=h\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 9 General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. 4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. 5. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. 6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Site Plan, Grading Plan, Building Elevation, Floor Plan, Landscape Plan, and Color and Material Board contained on file with the Planning Department. 7. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Conceptual Landscape Plan. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. The "Natural Undisturbed Open Space" area depicted on the Site Plan shall remain as open space and shall not be developed. 9. The colors and materials for the project shall substantially conform to those noted directly below and with Color and Material Board, contained on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division. Roof Tile Auburn Flat "Slate" Concrete Tile #430 Exterior Plaster: Frazee #8640W "Creative White" Exterior Plaster Accent: Frazee #8644M "Seal Beach" Exterior Plaster Tim/Gutters: Frazee #8645D "Greylock" RAC G A2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Ch=h\CC Staff Repot 7-22-03.doc 10 Window Surrounds Concrete Window Frames Clear Anodized Glazing Solar Gray 10. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. 11. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated May 6, 2002, on file with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, unless superceded by these conditions of approval. 12. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. 13. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. 14. Regular hours of operation shall be between 8:00 AM and 12:00 PM for Sunday Services, and Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM fro administrative purposes. 15. The maximum permitted capacity of this facility at any given time shall not exceed the 450-seat sanctuary (the fellowship hall cannot be used at the same time if the sanctuary hall is at capacity). This maximum capacity is based on the number of parking spaces provided. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 16. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff, and return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. 17. The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10' glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved colored architectural elevations to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 18. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 20. All the Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be satisfied. RAC U P\2002\02-0257 Gna Presbyterian Church\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doe II )rlor to Issuance of Building Permit A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. and other e)demally 22. An mounted utility 21. the gas meters De p appropriate method for screening roved by the Planning P equipment shall be reviewed and app of Temecula Fee Schedule. 23. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City fully enclosed by architectural 24. No roof-mounted equipment is permitted that is not - features of the buildings. the western the wall to the opposite side of 25. The landscape plans shall be modified ained include vines on walls eenfrom view by property lines and be trained and mainta hall 0 be over completely the wall. In addition, the modular building adding landscaping. (Amended by the Planning Commission June 18, 2003) inand Irrigation Plans shall be reviewewith d the 26, Three (3) copies of Construction tment. These plans shall conform substantially number, approved by the Planning Departm these conditions. The hy laps shall r, approved landscape plans, or as amended plants shall be shown. anied by the genus, species, and container size of the P lans shall be accomP consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans Fee Schedule at time of following items: of Temecula fee (per the City a Appropriate filing submittal). grading plan. of the approved g cb• One (1) copy Per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Water usage calculations p Efficient Ordinance). roved Plan)- d Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved which details e A landscape maintenance program shall blant na eril to assure proper growth the proper maintenance of all proposed p The term esthetics of the ermai enance and landscape development for the longromjed to the landsca--approved-maintenance program shall be p out the detailed program. _ contractor who shall be responsible to carry 27• All the Airport Land Use Commission Conditions of Approval shall be satisfied. 28. All chain link fencing shall be replaced with wrought iron. Prior to Building Occupancy install all landscaping and 29, Prior to occupancy of Phase to the property owner shall fully irrigation indicated on the landscape plans the property owner shall fully re-install all damaged 30. Prior to occupancy of Phase 2, roved plans. landscaping in accordance to the app roved by the Planning landscape maintenance from the date ofdthe first occupancy permit. 31 Submit a eriod of one-year Department for for a p Chwch\CCStafrRepon W\C U Moo2J1 -W Grace PmsbYwnan "212 3.doc 32. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 33. Additional landscaping including trees, shrubs, and vines, with the location, size, and species to be determined by City staff, shall be planted, as deemed appropriate by Planning staff, to sufficient completely screen the modular building from public streets and adjacent properties. (Amended by the Planning Commission June 18, 2003) DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. General Requirements 34. A Grading Permit for a precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 35. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 36. All improvement plans, grading plans, shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24' x 36' City of Temecula mylars. 37. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing and striping b. Storm drain facilities c. Sewer and domestic water systems d. Under grounding of existing utility distribution lines Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 38. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. 39. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. RAC U P1200M2-0257 Grace Pmbytuiaa Church\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 13 40. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. 41. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 42. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. 43. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NO[) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. 44. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Planning Department C. Department of Public Works 45. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 46. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. 47. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. 48. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. RAC U A2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Chwch\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 14 Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 49. Improvement plans and/or precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Foowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City Standard No. 800, 801, 802 and 803. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400.401 and 402. e. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries. I. Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing topography, utilities, and proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. g. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. h. Landscaping shall be limited in the comer cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. I. All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed through a storm drain system and discharge to the nearest storm water facility. 50. The Developer shall design and guarantee the construction the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works: a. Improve Nicholas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' RAW) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Improve Caile Medusa (Collector Road Standards - 66' R/1N) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 51. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections. 52. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 53. The Proposed driveway on Nicholas Road shall be restricted to "right-in" only. RAC U P2002\02-=7 Grace Presbyterian Chmh\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 15 54. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works for Calle Medusa and Nicholas Road. 55. All access rights, on Calle Medusa & Nicholas Road shall be restricted to those shown on the. site plan. Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication to the City. 56. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Solt - Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 57. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 58. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 59. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. 60. A Certification of Compliance shall be approved and recorded creating this parcel as a legal lot. 61. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District C. Department of Public Works 62. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 63. Final fire and fife safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy; use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes, which are in force at the time of building, plan submittal. 64. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix III. A, Table A-111-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1750 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 400 GPM RAC U P2002\02-0257 Cmace Presbyterian Church= Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 16 for a total fire flow of 2150 GPM with a 3 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2; Appendix III-A) 65. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 66. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 67. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) 68. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 lbs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 69. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 70. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 71. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) 72. Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 73. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals RAC U PQ0=2-0257 Grace Presbyterian ChurchtCC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 17 shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 241-4.1) 74. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, 'Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 75. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, mufti-family residential and. industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) 76. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) 77. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) 78. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a 'Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4) 79. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) 80. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. 81. Prior . to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3) RAC U P2002\020257 Graff Pmsbyterim CLwch%CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 18 Special Conditions 82. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. 83. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information: The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (Califomia Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. 84. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) COMMUNITY SERVICES GENERAL CONDITIONS 85. All perimeter landscaping including the parkway within the right-of-way, fencing and on- site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 86. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. 87. The developer shall provide adequate space for a recycling bin within the trash enclosure area. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 88. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 89. If additional arterial streetlights are to be installed as a result of this project, prior to issuance of building permit or the installation of street lighting on Calle Medusa or Nicolas Road, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. BUILDING AND SAFETY 90. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. F-AC U MOOZ02-0257 G= Presbyterian Chuwh\CC Staff Report 7.22-03.doc 19 91. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. 92. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 93. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 94. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building is required. The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 95. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) 96. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. 97. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. 98. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. 99. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. 100. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. 101. Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal to check for handicap accessibility. 102. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction: 103. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. 104. Show all building setbacks. 105. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. RAC U P2002\02-0257 Grace Presbyterian Chmh\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.doc 20 Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays OUTSIDE AGENCIES 106. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Airport Land Use Commission transmittal dated October 18, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 107. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the EMWD transmittal dated December 26, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 108. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District transmittal dated June 26, 2002, a copy of which is attached. 109. The applicant shall comply with the Conditions of Approval set forth in the Ranch California Water District transmittal dated May 22, 2002, a copy of which is attached. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Name printed RAC U P12002 -M7 Grace Presbyterian Chinch\CC Staff Report 7-22-03.dac 21 -rRlvarsl "U "T I J lot AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION RIVERSIDE COUNTY E fA 1CONONeC osvewr~aNr October 18, 2002 i) IL`pi IL'}a D OCT 2 5 2002 C" w0m ~ City of Temecula, Planning Dept, comaRl"'" P .O. Box 9033 VN:ECNNWH Temecula, CA 92589-9033 A0i' Gmff Attn: Matthew Hams COYIOSSIDNIMS RE: AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (ALUC) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Paul BU File No.: FV-02-108 A1arenoVaWy Related File: PA-02-0257 WaX Snyaa P*nDew Dear Applicant: FA SW" On October 17, 2002, the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), found . unsT.oay the above project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the French ck of Hemet Valley Airport. If the City should wish to override the Commission as per PUC 21774.5(d) s. pr A it should be subject to the following conditions: CaydTw*cth STAFF 1. Provide Avigation Easements to the French Valley Airport prior to final XoftD•Doins issuance of any permit. Exw&eDhft AI.CP.,AAAE WklghA* 2. Incorporate noise attenuation measure into any building construction to iGranide,Qk2W ensure interior noise levels are at or below 45-decibel levels. Tetp"514 x2m 3. Install hooded or shielded outdoor lighting to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky (lights must be downward facing). 4. No obstruction of the "FAR Part 77 Conical Surface" shall be permitted. 5. The following uses shall be prohibited: (a) Any use which would. direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. (b) Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. ,f I1 Page 2 October 18, 2002 (c) Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area. (d) Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Should you have any questions regarding this action, please contact me at (909) 351- 0700. Sincerely, RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION r Ke' Downs, A.I.C.P., A.A.A.E. Ex cutive Director KDD:jg cc: ALUC Staff Grace Presbyterian Church F.%h=WDCOMWRPORTSIALUCIFV-N-IBB.LTR dw EUNICIPAL ATEISTRICT 1950 December 26, 2002 Board ojDhators Praidert - "a D. Sinn City of Temecula Planning Department rkeprai w PO BOX 9033 Richard R. Hill Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Marion V. Ashley Randy A. Record Dear Colleague: David J. Slavrson Board secretary Re: SAN53-Sewer Will Serve Mary C. White PA 02-0257, Grace Presybterian Church Facility, located at the cmerd manager southwest comer of Calle Medusa and Nicholas Road AndwnyJ. Pack EMWD is willing to provide sewer service to the subject project. The provisions Dhworoftbe of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary `Ntf10p Ah",Wata arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects Dijft~ V the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is ry required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMWD expects the developer Trea a to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further Joseph J•KuebleyCPA arrangements for service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility Legal Coa,rsd construction inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial Redw candShnal participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's New Business Development Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as water shortages, regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (909) 928-3777, ext. 4447. Sincerely, Fred Azimie Civil Engineering Associate II New Business Development Dept. FArw Cc: Russell Rumansoff G:WCCESSWew Busl\DADVuchlveslYea20021PA02-0257.doo MailingAddrers: Post Office Box 8300 Perris, CA 92572-8300 Telephone: (909) 928-3777 Fax: (909) 928-6177 T.nrneinn• 997l1T .....u_ D__a n_. nA - DAVID P. ZAPPE 199s MARKET STREET • GGnva1 Aisnagw•GTief~~Enginar tt i~ U l'n ~ I I I ,f RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 909.955.120o 909.788.9965 FAX JUN 2 8 2002 ~p suso.t 0y' RSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City offnTgemepcula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92569-9033 Attention: MA~ 6g-&l 4 ric Ladies gnd Gentlemen: Re: PA 0 2 ^ 0 2$'] The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases In incorporated cities. The District also does riot t plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard repot for such ncDisbkt iximMenhtecommendations for such cases are nonnaly limited to items of specific interest to the District Including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other flood control and drainage facigttes which could be considered a logical corn porf or extension of a master and District c Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). n addition, information of a general nais The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any WE health and safety or~anyy ~ such Isssue dorsemeM of the proposed Prd with respect to flood hazard 001 --y ~io~ject wo lit noto be Impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of Th is project Involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will= ownership of such facilities on written ~P~ ~Ilt of rthe equite or Damust be constricted to District ds. and Disaia p~ check and regsuirrredd. acceptance. Plan check Inspection and administrathre fees will be cor sider~ regional inn andl drains a in diameter, or other facdtiles that could be off tl City i Fa des mud p ri Sng oip es on wriMmireqUiff and Inspection i will be regaled for DLsfrict acceptance. Plan check iruP¢ctlorsairaBve)f req This project is located wiWni thee8rnits of the Disirk8s Ir. cek/Se,~Q~, fjµ`s Area cheoror Pn~ f orr ~ tfie ~ ~ ~r p y ie~s ey only to Flood Control Di~p~dor to~aeksuarica of building or pemiils whichever comes first Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance- of 9ie acWal penniL GENERAL INFORMATION This ccess Crontrolre uire a National Clearance Pollutant for ng Discharge Elimination of System Mapproval spermit from hould not grvven until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt If this pried Involves a Federal EmergencsManagement Agency (FEMA1 mapped flood plain then the City should required ~requIreemereds,~andshshoiuldpfuurthe r quire tth eyat'the alpapt~ikl op~andCaWBreitiioinall qer of ZIP to meet FEMA prior to grad ing, recordation or other final approval bf the project and a Letter of Map Resion Revi OMRS~prriorr 16 If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is imppaacted by this pr the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Califomia Departmer t of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Ad indi on 404 Permit from the U.S. Amry Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these as may gting the protect is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Qua]i'~tyy Certffica8on required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours. MART E. MCKIBBIN Senior Civil Engineer c: Data. 2to-200?r i~ May 22, 2002 D ~ ~ ~ Q u MAY 2 4 2002 D Wft i1A~ilW ey Matthew Harris, Case Planner City of Temecula Bard ofDkwtm Planning Department _ ILa D. Be,- 43200 Business Park Drive rrntaat Post Office Box 9033 '.mr,r.~■ia Temecula, 92589-9033 @r. We Paa.i&. St"hm J. Corona Bdp►H. Daly SUBJECT: WATERAVAH,ABILITY Bm R. Drab PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 29 AS SHOWN IN BOOK 1, John SHoaylaaa PAGES 44, 45, AND 46; APN 957-140-010 Caba F. sn PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0257 GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH om~ John F.Hmnipr Dear Mr. Harris: Gm am=vw Vamp put" D a Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the a.a.ar.r boundaries of Rancho California Water District "."BWr.®m. (RCV✓D). Water service, Dkwt.dZnpoe.,iW therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements 6mnetp a Dal' between RC WD and the property owner. Dk..krd0pmd. . F,rr.,g,~k If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees Caotra° and requirements. Llnda L7. Fr.Qo.o Dirhkt 9.=UWA&iair &e serkammb~ Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an ~ & Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. Dwk Mm LLP C wa cuunw If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RA/NCyHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Steve Brannon, P.E. Development Engineering Manager 0ZSB:at101F012-T6\FCF Rambo CaMomia Wat.r Di kk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _ O. Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA08-0153 Applicant: Russell Rumansoff, Herron and Rumansoff Architects, Inc. Proposal: A Major Modification Application to construct a 6,532 square foot two-story expansion of an existing Fellowship Hall for Grace Presbyterian Church Location: Generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road [APN 957-140-010] Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review. A Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA Section 15162 (subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Case Planner: Betsy Lowrey Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Date of Hearing: November 5, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge the project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at , or prior to, the public hearing. The proposed project application may be viewed at the Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at the City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 694-6400. WMW - VX C,~i 111. ~ :1\ / 1 PA08-0153 lS \ rl `+"v WS~.E II 'H ,2 1 tl 0 a ra xo eeo I.a•.: -----_"''Ir I Fee: `w Notice of Public Hearing