Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout121708 PC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title III. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE DECEMBER 17, 2008 - 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 2008-54 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Chiniaeff Roll Call: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of November 5, 2008 t 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Amendment to Affordable Housing Condition of Approval for Temecula Lane, Planning Application Nos. PA04-0490 (Vesting Tentative Map). PA04-0491 (Conditional Use Permit), and PA04-0492 (Development Plan), Patrick Richardson RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISION TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEMECULA LANE REVISING CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 11 FOR PA04-0490, VESTING TENTATIVE MAP (RESOLUTION 06-06) AND CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 18 FOR PA04-0491 AND PA04-0492, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, TO PROVIDE ELEVEN (11) VERY LOW INCOME HOUSING UNITS INSTEAD OF 86 MODERATE INCOME HOUSING UNITS AT THE TEMECULA LANE PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 4 Planning Application Nos. PA06-0205 and PA07-0309, a Development Plan for the construction of 3 two-story buildings, Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO- 6) Amendment, and a Minor Exception for parking, generally located 425 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road on Temecula Parkway, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 2 PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0205, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT THREE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 64,460 SQUARE FEET IN THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6), AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08 0273, A MINOR EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN PARKING, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 425 FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD (APN 959-060- 007) 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO.08-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17.22 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING CITYWIDE STANDARDS FOR A ZONING AMENDMENT TO ADD PLANNING AREA C TO THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0309)" REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM PLANNING DIRECTOR ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 6:00 P.M. City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. The entire agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at cityoftemecula.org. 3 ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 5, 2008 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 p.m., on Wednesday, November 5, 2008, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Harter led the audience in the.Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, and Telesio Absent: None PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments at this time. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Proposed general vacation of the alley between Second and Third Street and between Old Town Front Street to the Murrieta Creek Channel RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Adoption a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08-47 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED VACATION OF THE EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREET AND BETWEEN OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL CONFORMS TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\MinutesPC\110508 1 COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Planning Application PA08-0192 a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity, as required by the Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control to authorize a Type-20 Off- Sale Beer and Wine ABC (Alcoholic Beverage Control) license for a wholesale gift basket manufacturer and distributor, located within the Light Industrial (LI) zone located at 26090 Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Findings for a Public Convenience or Necessity Case Planner Lowrey provided a brief staff report (of record). MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3 Long Range Planning Application No LR08-0045 a Development Code Amendment to define full service hotels revise the intensity bonus justification requirements for full service hotels whose intensity of development exceeds the target Floor Area Ratio allowed in the zone add new parking standards for full service hotels, and add a provision to allow for tandem parking spaces when valet service is provided at a full service hotel Katie Innes RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DEFINE FULL SERVICE HOTELS, REVISE THE INTENSITY BONUS JUSTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS WHOSE INTENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDS THE TARGET FLOOR AREA RATIO ALLOWED IN THE ZONE, ADD NEW PARKING STANDARDS FOR FULL SERVICE HOTELS, AND ADD A PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR TANDEM PARKING SPACES WHEN VALET SERVICE IS PROVIDED AT A FULL SERVICE HOTEL" Case Planner Innes, by way of PowerPoint Presentation, highlighted the main components of staff's report as follows: • Project Description • Definition • Density Bonus Requirements • Parking Ratio RAMinutesMI 10508 2 Tandem Parking Environmental Determination Recommendation Querying on the intent of the proposed Ordinance, Commissioner Chiniaeff stated why not just automatically increase the FAR to accommodate for full service hotels. Understanding Commissioner Chiniaeff's query, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that having the applicant request FAR would ensure that the applicant is providing some extra amenities that would be required by the Development Code. For Commissioner Harter, Case Planner Innes noted that if a full service motel were to come in, meeting spaces would be calculated separate from the guest rooms. At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers it was closed. In order to be consistent with the Municipal Code Chapter 10, Deputy Director of Public Works York requested that the term "City Engineer" be replaced with "Traffic Engineer" in Sections 17.2402F and 17.08050. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 4 Planning Application No PA08-0162 a Maior Modification to modify all exterior elevations of an existing restaurant Five 'N Diner (approved Development Plan PA99-0476), to be reconstructed as a bank Arrowhead Credit Union generally located on the east side of Ynez Road approximately 500 feet south of Winchester Road at 26460 Ynez Road RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION 08-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.. PA08-0162, A MAJOR MODIFICATION TO MODIFY ALL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS OF AN EXISTING RESTAURANT, FIVE 'N DINER (APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PA99-0476) TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AS A BANK, ARROWHEAD CREDIT UNION, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD APPROXIMATELY 500 FEE SOUTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AT 26460 YNEZ ROAD (APN 910-320-037) Case Planner Lowrey provided the Planning Commission a PowerPoint Presentation highlighting the following main components: • Project Description • Site Plan • Landscaping • Architecture RAMinutesPC\110508 3 • Surrounding Structures • Recommendation At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers it was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Carey moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Harter seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. 5 Planning Application No PA08 0153 a Maior Modification to construct a 6,532 square foot two story expansion of an existing Fellowship Hall/Worship Center for Grace Presbyterian Church generally located at the southwest corner of Nicolas and Calle Medusa at 31143 Nicolas Road RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0153, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO MODIFY AN EXISTING FELLOWSHIP HALL/WORSHIP CENTER ORIGINALLY ENTITLED TO CONSTRUCT A ONE- STORY 2,600 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION TO BE A TWO-STORY 6,532 SQUARE FOOT EXPANSION (A TOTAL INCREASE OF 3,932 SQUARE FEET), GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NICOLAS ROAD AND CALLE MEDUSA AT 31143 NICOLAS ROAD (APN 957-140-010) By way of PowerPoint Presentation, Case Planner Lowrey provided the following staff report, highlighting on the main components of staff's report: • Project Description • Location • Site Plan • Background • Architecture • South Elevation • West Elevation • Environmental Determination • Recommendation At this time, the public hearing was opened. A. Mr. Russel Rumansoff, representing Grace Presbyterian Church, advised that the applicant would be in full agreement of all Conditions of Approval and would look forward to moving the project forward. At this time, the public hearing was closed. RAMinutesPC\110508 4 MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONERS' REPORTS A. Referencing the property on Nichols and Joseph, Commissioner Guerriero stated that the site would be in desperate need of maintenance. B. With respect to infill projects, Chairman Telesio requested that staff press upon applicant's the importance of compatibility with their project and surrounding buildings. Understanding Chairman Telesio's request, Director of Planning Ubnoske stated she will take this forward to staff. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No report given at this time by Director of Planning Ubnoske. Deputy Director of Public Works York briefly reported the following: • That it would be the opinion of the Traffic Engineer that center-line striping on wide residential streets adjacent to schools would not necessarily prevent the issues that currently exists; that if it were the desire of the Planning Commission, staff could monitor a location of concern and take the issue to the Public Traffic Safety Commission for consideration • That the unimproved sidewalk area west of Ynez Road (Rancho Highlands) will be graded and the area will be raised to install a temporary sidewalk ADJOURNMENT At 6:28, p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned to November 19. 2008 at 6:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Telesio Debbie Ubnoske Chairman Director of Planning RAMhutesPC\110508 5 ITEM 2 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: December 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report Planning Director's Agenda items for November 2008 Date Case No. Proposal Applicant Action November 6, 2008 PA08-0156 A Development Plan to construct a Tony Mansour APPROVED one-story, 8,630 square foot office American building, located on the southeast Agcredit corner of Winchester Road and Zevo Drive November 20, 2008 PA08-0196 A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Bill Barkho APPROVED Starbuzz Hookah Lounge to authorize a private membership club in Suites 108 and 109 in an existing shopping center, located at 32483 Temecula Parkway November 20, 2008 PA08-0206 A Minor Conditional Use Permit to Gerry Kent APPROVED allow Public House live entertainment and upgrade their existing Type-41 ABC license to a Type-47 ABC license, located at 41971 Main Street November 20, 2008 PA08-0154 A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Jessica Large APPROVED the Iron Wok to conduct live entertainment with a band or disk jockey, and a dance are, general located on the southeast corner of Ynez Road and Promenade Mall North at 26520 Ynez Road Attachment: Action Agendas ACTION AGENDAS z ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING November 6, 2008 1:30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Deputy Director of Planning 'PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 1:30 p.m. Project Number: PA08-0156 Project Type: Development Plan Project Title: American Agcredit ACA Applicant: Tony Mansour Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a one-story 8,630 office building/bank Location: Generally located on the southeast corner of Winchester Road and Zevo Drive Environmental Action: Exempt per CEQA Section 15332, Class 32 In-fill Development Project Planner: Eric Jones ACTION: APPROVED The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Director's Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.cityoftemecula.org. P:\Planning\Directors-Hearing\2008\I1-06-2008 Action Agenda.doc 1 ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING November 20, 2008 1:30 p.m. TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 1:30 p.m. Project Number: PA08-0196 Project Type: Minor Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Starbuzz Hookah MCUP Applicant: Bill Barkho Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit for Starbuzz Hookah Lounge in Suites 108 and 109 in an existing shopping center Location: 32483 Temecula Parkway Environmental Action: Exempt per CEQA Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters ACTION: APPROVED Item No. 2 Project Number: PA08-0206 Project Type: Minor Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Public House MCUP Applicant: Gerry Kent Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the Public House live entertainment and to upgrade their existing Type-41 ABC license (on-sale beer and wine-eating place) to a Type -47 ABC license (on- sale general-eating place) Location: 41971 Main Street Environmental Action: Exempt per CEQA Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters ACTION: APPROVED P:\Planning\Directors-Hearing\2008\11-20.2008 Action Agenda.doc Item No. 3 Project Number: PA08-0154 Project Type: Minor Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Iron Wok MCUP Applicant: Jessica Large Project Description: A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the Iron Wok to conduct live entertainment with a band or disk jockey, and a dance area Location: Generally located on the southeast corner of Ynez Road and Promenade Mall North at 26520 Ynez Road Environmental Action: Exempt per CEQA Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Eric Jones ACTION: APPROVED The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Director's Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.cityoftemecula.org. P:\Planning\Dirmtors-Hearing\2008\11-20.2008 Action Agenda.doc 2 ITEM 3 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: December 17, 2008 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow/Matt Peters, Case Planners APPLICANT NAME: DR Horton PROJECT A request to modify Conditions of Approval for the Temecula Lane SUMMARY: project revising Condition of Approval No. 11 for PA04-0496, Vesting Tentative Map (Resolution 06-06) and Condition of Approval No. 18 for PA04-0491 and PA04-0492, Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan (Resolution 06-06) regarding the provision of affordable units RECOMMENDATION: Approve BACKGROUND SUMMARY On March 21, 2006, the City Council denied an appeal and upheld the decision of the Planning Commission to approve Planning Application Nos. PA04-0490, Vesting Tentative Tract Map; PA04-0491, Conditional Use Permit; and PA04-0492, Development Plan (product review) for the development of 96 single-family units, 96 tri-plex units, and 236 four-plex units (428 total units) generally located at the northeast corner of Loma Linda Road and Temecula Lane, known as Temecula Lane. According to Section 17.10.020.3 of the Development Code, affordable residential housing is permitted in the PO zone with an approved Conditional Use Permit. The approved development would set aside 86 of the 118 two-bedroom homes located within the four-plex portion of the site for home buyers who qualify for low income housing. As approved, these 86 units were to be designated for moderate income housing. Given the slow down in the housing market and the credit crisis, the developer has found it nearly difficult, if not impossible, to find qualified buyers for the units who meet the income and credit requirements. They have worked for several months with the Housing and Redevelopment staff on this issue, who have verified this difficulty. As an alternative, the developer has requested a change to this provision (and required Condition of Approval), to convey ownership of eleven (11) units to the City. The City would then convey the units to a non-profit affordable housing developer, who would own and manage the units, through a long term agreement with the City, as very low income rental units. The current and proposed Condition of Approval are listed below: Current Condition of Approval The Owner shall, without economic or other contribution by the City, identify, construct and thereafter maintain not less than 86 of the two bedroom homes in the four-plex component units for and as affordable housing units. The term "affordable housing unit" shall have the same meaning as is set forth in the Temecula Municipal Code. The units shall be maintained as affordable units by means of a written agreement and covenant/deed restriction that burdens i the title to the subject property for the benefit of City, for the purpose of ensuring that the units are maintained as affordable for not less than 55 years. The form of agreement and covenant/deed restriction shall, for the City, be subject to the approval of the City Manager and City Attorney. The agreement shall specify, in addition to all other terms deemed necessary by the City and owner to effectuate the intent of the parties, that 86 of two-bedroom units shall be maintained as affordable. The affordable units shall be allocated to the low income categories as defined in Health and Safety Code §50079.5. The Owner shall reimburse the City its reasonable cost of preparing the Agreements including attorney fees and staff time. No building permit shall be issued by the City for any of the development authorized by this Resolution until the Agreements have been executed by the parties and the covenant/deed restriction submitted for recordation by the County of Riverside Recorder's Office. Revised/Proposed Condition of Approval In order to comply with the affordable housing requirements for developing residential units in the Professional Office Zone, the owner shall, without economic or other contribution by the City, convev eleven (11) units of the two-bedroom homes in the four-plex component to the City for rental or sale of the units to "lower income households" within the meaning of Health and Safety Cod Section 50079.5. The Owner shall convey such units to the City free and clear of all monetary liens and such other encumbrances that are incompatible with use of the units for housing affordable for lower income households. The City shall accept such units and may convey such units to an affordable housing developer so long as such affordable housing developer makes the units available for sale or rent to lower income households. The units to be conveyed are to be approved by the Director of Planning prior to the conveyance of the unit to the City. The Owner and City shall enter into an agreement with escrow instructions for the conveyance of said units to the City or its nominee as approved by the City Council. No building permit or Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued by the City or any of the development authorized by this approval unless and until the City and Developer have entered into an enforceable agreement for the conveyance of said units. Staff supports the proposed revision to the project as it will help the City meet the goals of our Housing Element with regard to the provision of very low income housing within the City. ATTACHMENTS PC Resolution 2 PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A REVISION TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR TEMECULA LANE REVISING CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 11 FOR PA04-0490, VESTING TENTATIVE MAP (RESOLUTION 06-06) AND CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 18 FOR PA04-0491 AND PA04-0492, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN, TO PROVIDE ELEVEN (11) VERY LOW INCOME HOUSING UNITS INSTEAD OF 86 MODERATE INCOME HOUSING UNITS AT THE TEMECULA LANE PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOMA LINDA ROAD AND TEMECULA LANE Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On March 21, 2006 the City Council approved Planning Application Nos. PA04-0490, Vesting Tentative Map, PA04-0491, Conditional Use Permit, and PA04- 0492, Development Plan, for Temecula Lane. B. On November 1, 2008, DR Horton, filed a request to modify the project conditions of approval. C. The request was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting,. considered the request on December 17, 2008, as a Current Business Item. E. At the conclusion of the Commission meeting, the Commission approved the request to replace Condition of Approval No. 11 for Planning Application No. PA04- 0490 and Condition of Approval No. 18 for Planning Application Nos. PA04-0491 and PA04-0492 (from Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-06), with the following language: "In order to comply with the affordable housing requirements for developing residential units in the Professional Office Zone, the Owner shall, without economic or other contribution by the City, convey eleven (11) units of the two bedroom homes in the four-plex component to the City for rental or sale of the units to "lower income households" within the meaning of Health and Safety Cod Section 50079.5. The Owner shall convey such units to the City free and clear of all monetary liens and such other encumbrances that are incompatible with use of the units for housing affordable for lower income households. The City shall . accept such units and may convey such units to an affordable housing developer so long as such affordable housing developer makes the units available for sale or rent to lower income households. The units to be conveyed are designated as The Owner and City shall enter into an agreement with escrow instructions for the conveyance of said units to the City or its nominee as approved by the City Council. No building permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued by the City or any of the development authorized by this approval unless and until the City and Developer have entered into an enforceable agreement for the conveyance of said units." F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary ITEM 4 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: December 17, 2008 PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Nos. PA07-0309, PA06-0205, and PA08-0273, SUMMARY: a Zoning Amendment Application to amend the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) to allow for the creation of Planning Area C on the western end of the PDO area, a Development Plan to construct three 'professional office buildings totaling 65,640 square feet, and a Minor Exception to allow for a reduction in parking, generally located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately a 425 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination Section 15162, Consistent with the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Jim Griffin - Covenant Development General Plan PO (Professional Office) Designation: Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay 6 (Rancho Pueblo) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: PDO-6/Vacant Parcel North: Very Low Residential (VL)/existing custom homes South: Temecula Parkway/Planned Development 4/existing East: Professional Office (PO)/vacant lot West: Very Low Residential (VL)/existing custom home Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 5.29 Acres N/A Per PDO Total Floor Area/Ratio: .28 N/A Per PDO Landscape Area/Coverage: 83,547/36% N/A Per PDO Parking Required/Provided: 245 Spaces N/A Per PDO t BACKGROUND SUMMARY On July 31, 2006, Jim Griffin submitted a Development Plan application for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex. The project consists of three two-story buildings each totaling 21,880 square feet within the existing Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6). A Minor Exception Application was also submitted on December 2, 2008 in order to address a parking deficiency of ten spaces. In addition, a Zoning Amendment application was submitted on November 1, 2007 in order to amend the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) by creating Planning C within the PDO. This new planning area will be the site of the proposed Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex and was previously designated as a ball field for the Rancho Community Church and schools. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Zoning Amendment The proposed amendment for the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) is designed to provide development standards for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex and create Planning Area C which will house the development. The amendment is necessary since the PDO currently indicates that a ball field will be placed in the location of the proposed Halcon Rojo site as part of Planning Area A. The currently approved PDO-6 was designed to allow a total 315,374 square feet of allowable building square footage for the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center (Planning Area B) located on the far east side of PDO-6. However, the Development Plan for the area was only approved for 217,378 square feet of allowable building area leaving a remainder of 97,996 square feet that would not be used. Of this remainder, 65,640 square feet will essentially be transferred to the newly proposed Planning Area C in order to accommodate the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex. The uses within Planning Area B and the proposed Planning Area C are consistent with each other. Staff has reviewed these proposed revisions and is supportive of the changes. The addition of the Halcon Rojo Professional Center is consistent with the intent of the PDO to allow for a variety of professional services. Development Plan Site Plan The Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex is comprised of three two-story office buildings totaling 65,640 square feet along Temecula Parkway. Building one will be set back approximately 120 feet from Temecula Parkway. Buildings two and three are setback approximately 120 feet from the rear property line. This rear setback is desirable since the project is adjacent to existing single-family homes in an area zoned Very Low Residential (VL). It must also be noted that the project is bordered to the north and west by a Municipal Water District easement. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, which allows for multi-tenant office buildings and meets all provisions within the Development Code and the proposed PDO amendment. 2 Architecture The proposed building elevations and architecture for the project are consistent with the provisions contained within the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The architectural style of the development integrates distinctive mission style elements that are consistent with other developments located within the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay. These elements include exposed rafter beam tails, mission roof tiles, and mission styled decorative accent lighting. Windows for the buildings also incorporate the mission style. In addition, the office buildings feature a smooth stucco finish that is consistent with other developments within the PDO. The three buildings are configured around a decorative trellis and water feature which is prominently facing Temecula Parkway. This trellis area will incorporate seating around a water feature for patrons of the center. Covered outdoor eating areas with vines will also be provided for employees to use during breaks. Landscaping The selection and placement of landscaping compliments the overall development. Thirty-six percent of the project will be landscaped, which exceeds the minimum Development Code requirement of 25 percent for projects within a Professional Office zoning district. The landscape plans indicate that a landscape buffer of approximately 30 feet will separate the southern parking lot area from Temecula Parkway. Also, the Municipal Water District easement located on the north and western boarders of the property will be flanked by landscaping. The landscape plans also indicate that the easement itself will incorporate hydroseed. In addition, landscaping will also be placed around each of the buildings as a way to provide an attractive visual break between them and the parking lot and hardscape areas. Access/Circulation Access to the site will be provided through two vehicular access points. The first point will provide right-in right-out vehicular ingress and egress from Temecula Parkway at the southeastern portion of the property. This type of access is necessary due to an existing raised median located directly in front of the property. The second access point will be provided through a road that will enter the property at the southeast as well. Once on the property, vehicular access is provided around the entire site by the driveway system in the parking lot. A decorative round-a-bout feature has been included near the front courtyard of the project to add a convenient passenger drop-off location and visual interest. This area will feature decorative stamped concrete and a landscaped island. Minor Exception The Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex was originally submitted before a relatively recent Development Code update regarding parking was approved by the City Council on October 23, 2007. The amendment included an update for calculating the way parking is evaluated for medical and dental offices from one space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area to one space for every 200. As a result, the proposed project will be deficient by ten spaces if all suites are leased for medical and dental uses since it only provides 245 spaces yet is required to provide 255 to meet the new code requirement. 3 The Development Code states that a Minor Exception for parking may be granted for a reduction of required parking by no more than fifteen percent. The parking reduction sought by the applicant is insignificant since it totals approximately four percent. The Minor Exception will allow the project to remain compliant with Development Code standards. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on December 6, 2008 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved a Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review. The previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration was designed to examin a total 315,374 square feet of allowable building square footage for the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center (Planning Area B) located on the far east side of PDO-6. However, the Development Plan for the project was only approved for 217,378 square feet of allowable building area. This left a remaineder of 97,996 square feet that was evaluated by the Mitigated Negative Declaration yet would not be used. 65,640 square feet of this remainder will essentially be transferred to the newly proposed Planning Area C in order to accommodate the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex. The uses within Planning Area B and the proposed Planning Area C are consistent with each other. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010. F) The proposed use is in conformance with the general plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city The proposed use is consistent with the goals and policies contained within the General Plan. According to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Professional Office Land Use Designation allows for multi-tenant office buildings situated in a landscaped garden setting. This project consists of three two-story office buildings with sufficient landscaping and outdoor amenities consistent with the objectives contained in the General Plan. The proposed project is also consistent with all zoning requirements for the Professional Office (PO) zoning district. The project meets all applicable design standards contained within the Development Code and City- Wide Design Guidelines, and the design of the project meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. 4 The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. PDO (Zoning Code Amendment) The proposed Planned Development Overlay is consistent with the General Plan and the site is physically suitable for the project and is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed Planned Development Overlay amendment is consistent with the land use designation of the General Plan of the City of Temecula. In addition, the use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan. The site has been reviewed by Building and Safety, Public Works, Fire, Planning and TCSD to ensure it is physically suitable for the type of use proposed for the project site. These same departments have also reviewed the project to ensure it is not detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. Minor Exception (Section 17.03.060.D.2) That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property. The proposed Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex was compliant with the Development Code upon submittal. It was only after the approval of an amendment to the parking standards by the City Council on October 23, 2007 that the proposed project became deficient by ten spaces if all suites would be eventually leased out as medical or dental space. In addition, the site lacks the physical space to incorporate the additional spaces needed to adhere to a strict application of the code. The Minor Exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The Minor Exception does not grant any special privileges to the applicant. This is because other property owners with similar circumstances may also apply for a Minor Exception. In addition, staff has determined that the Minor Exception is not detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. The Minor Exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. The Minor Exception does not negatively impact the surrounding properties since it is only comprised of a small reduction in parking spaces. In addition, the Minor Exception does not permit a use that is not allowed within the Professional Office General Plan designation. 5 ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution - Development Plan and Minor Exception Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Resolution - PDO Amendment Exhibit A - CC Ordinance Notice of Public Hearing s VICINITY MAP - X "Del ors ~ - If r If - Rp • - _ - pOR~~ V~ D,E A - - - - i--~ i - - PA06-0205 TEMECULA PKY z _w iTPYCOR~ < SAMANTHA LN (~-IC NTERFI~?bR II-D m, Ji _Ipl P w i CG(- n BAYHILL ORU__ ia~ 'aft -I / O" o Jnf- ' 7 / A PLAN REDUCTIONS OIVtl NryJNM -NYItl 3L$ '1I133 ~ r ~ ppCCyy 99 d - q a C1 ~ ~ ~ qp .YS`a AP~p'@}6"~}i{~ Y id }'SAS ~ a Z O c fp (ll V yy ii I i9 yy y = aFy spQs 5 ~ r e t ~yY ~Y! ~ ~.t17d aaai~~y l{ ~ ~ ~6 Q Q U l~~2~ ~y~yypn„Y H'~g ~ ~a ~a va N pE ^ W~~U > f LLLp_x d3q Q.Y1 d ,'i~ N e e p ¢ g Ew'j'j p6 O E 7 Q§ID a pp yF~ d S i i L+ Y_I_11 W Ur ~ c. ~ 2$ }8 ~Q~ qqS~i~ aaa aS ~ti 0 63 E~ pp ~ QO L ~i J o. " =O ppy g gtY94 Y au pb uS a_i, p ° a.._ 2 e Ys U +11 g zREeeeeAaaS3f@#9 05@@ay i o@`GH<i _ ~a °p~~_ ~u a 11 1'I I m 1 li, eZQ $ A y h~ p ~ m ol~ II ~ a ~~m o ~ e I I ' ay. o`° ~ I 'I 0 11 I 'i i~~ Oj ~ # ~ I a I 1, N _a A y I/xl I till l7h 1 ~ a' °j> d 1 Z °t 1 I'i Z Z n$ i >z 1 1, 40 3 s i, II / eRnAreauuEw~ gg d$ III I Ip 1f "vn E2 ~ pt 4i W_ If fit 04 'I" W~.,s ti I o N Q I U~ I d m I I I~' I~$e- I , ' O d ml o&dA _ i Jo II '~I, Ins tl .J ~ wa I Whd 14. o ondr 5p Uoe~ _ Ir- I u I r ^ p$~~ ~ ~ ' _ ..14 I' I R ~ I ( - I' t $ ^Yar~\ ~ Y Out O I 4 Z.Z I znuc ~a 04 , F i N o Cl) s a' •P a gg$ ~i Pap O C `e i y E3 O R q 8 ed[ 8 d `eA3'e££ $ w0 Z 21B pT $nY~ Tv €W k 11 pI+ ^e ..1 x EE~3~3W k g. 4s d 0 1 ! ~{}{L a x E$__Tey_ ~4 e~°°~ w wvwi o u o I I + 1 II I T O r.: i X F lg3Si3.g$G 45 Y•n °O3 $U 'o e a I I I ~ m ~$444i4dae~~~a €d Sa xSg~4A a$ L~ o Q T`~ 9 J ~o _e~ a g~_ W sAA.b rn a q rS z 4~ b_ 8~ ~rpg 2°ti r9&3 i _ 4 ~ ~ ~ < a y~y ~ g gg' ~ c'~ 8 ~ 3= 3~ €gT i~° 0$~3 axxx '4y3a $ g E $ py m "e d e, w e Yt s z a w$32YSi3 IiJ~5 a 6 k_ LL (OJ Vf: EE~a,a~~. ~ = a®a o~~4 NV ~ _e C 7R z z ~ a a a a Ut 13 O m ~ Z ~ Q .v~ Z UU a li ° V F y 6 F k 1 j A m's ay N T 4 ¢ • T ~li~€ < C ? ~e _ ill 2± a" g~ O 4 Q it il. % y 6 r/i l w ^ aL a aLl~ ~ ~ ~ --r ~ ~ as a ` .x n~ o a~lviA oc= C C / w PJ `o co .E a ow 25 w Y Z a U u' OE Zp Om d ss y Z02 W W U1 U \ \ ~ i:'u =c~ U w \ aH ti ¢ \ W uYiv ~ 3 y0a N q~ a 7+sid o w ~t~ a 3d= ~w m / b p / e - X11 I I I I I II I. - ! I 1 0.i P 1'09 Ja6~Y 6163 - ~i ~ PWVIJTEOWYEMAYB I ~ n~ti ~~i z r / r n b ~ ~ I c a:. ~ 1 b _ o \ - s - - u 4 9 S o V-E C 1 i k I 'Add OT- - - J C 6 -•o ws~.+ba~w~~ J®ORYi~11.1 » 1 H ~9NWNYId 911f1AT'l NpLLY3M~3tl d 14 au 3anm ]tarot n t,aZi am wwa,~roa @ ! LM9dOaO lNtll9A00 .9aw g 8 i i 31 L3DHDW 3dw3sOH dnouo vuenv w OfOH NOOIVH -90 8 V9H9 Stll + <r s° N o S a ;a2" CL Y ~ @ e II y a a pi f o a e~ EE =^9a8 a tl'i .t G II 9 9 9 r e f CC§ ® y q § ~ I 9 9 lu EE6 [plpppppp~ §k~~ ~ +~kzikie 111 d ,8, AYM3VN8 3LYAWd fj ~ } ~ ~ , N @ I 0000 S d 2f 0®( ao sq, m o _ ! P e t~ y y v ~i ~ y a 4- ! Oil 11M N Qo,~``~tl pe ~qE e @ ae ae ra~e~ae~ae ae "2 4 ~ 9~ ~YY~It gt~ 8~ y~~~~ - 4 estl83e_atla ~ ~~@ ~ ogjm s ; 9 94 E Xb' i ~t€~4➢tl€iltl€$a12~.$A € a•oao ~~]tis~xye~V II~~~- LTV ®Y.a Ylitlal ~j'j I o 'ININM'ld 5311I1UIJ NOLL'/3tl]3tl , Rau 3VOIWWp3~(Q o NL ~ a.aaao au.woa] ! 1!9'IdD-80a INVN3= 3EIfllJ3LHJtlV 3dVJ54NV1~ w drro~ vdevvvfnv a orod NO3IVH na svsuie sn o s o N o o $ glee degg (A gg - gYQg Cy5 a :BBf 'F S£ € ~$C 8 2.F lilt if m <1 I Wit 0 ~ y f 1 iffl~ zI f R8 . ~ F ale 1 ! I ~ 4 g I D E M~ U a€ e$€ se 0 6 4 O I [ D F LL o © 0 W0 0 0 0 = h a a. sr - ~y °a ~ ~ c 4 a?r c E= ~ N Z ® n $ ~iA ' n ® m 0 O - _ - , -y U- T T ! ° 9$ = 9 Q gi a a © O 00 ~ O O O h ~ N LLI o- t----~ --0 n u aiq F; u . z OLL - 00 8 r - - -q - - - - - - fi~ m J i 6 g p j; 81~ $3 0O O o- - - - o U- JQ W U =ll jj §t a -jO U. W cy-, ~ 0 © O OOO O 0 0 N i uA- p a ze 4Y 4) r$ LL © S p - {V N O ~ O = g ~gc ® 2e 9' ® m O dgr~ 0 asp Z i a ~ s 'fl3 ~ • O O Oa O tl 0 O O _ e. 5' --0 g~ d O ,ar ®s~ 16 2e U N LLI O y O n u z o LL ii 3 ® -O ® „ s ® 7 ce J Q ' gll air ' m ZZ O !!'3 O J Jp N v = W LL- aq a WOW ~'fl ~ fl~LL ~ s oa w I d ~ i Nil! O O M a. a.R .R: ~ ~ 3 Q - -e CL u a O c 3 ~ 16 e c o i 311' O 3 t @ Q. LU 4 ~ y 1y ~y ~ 4 ~ {n s@Ae J Z'i3 _ m am Q)' --------J - [ F=' .I O _ ir-.---.-----_- - n LL M Y 2 ] a m 2 O y/^~~' 3tl v g ~4 1 0 0 00 0 0 0 ~ a 16 5 LL SS li r y 1 = Ln W Izss m oLLLL 01O - J Z Q-' 1 ® € ii - ZZ o - rq--- -s A O a JVi U F_,; Q N LLJ =LL + - . ~ U 4Y1 W W f QO_ w o-- 2 2s - l9ii © o 00 0 0 0 © o co 0 0 0 a Z ___0' Y i y N O * * = O 1~LL .s~ - PO O F O1iIN >s O O co Q O Z ® g ® e~ ® o ® i» Imo- Y V d o------=` - - - - - - - - i 'a 4 © Q 0 S Z° 5= ^ * r 6 J » lu. RIO - * 6 O ®?li ~ Y - ; r m W i U O„`_ . ® OO Za 2 O O OV0 a 3a J N LLI g _ = U- -JO i .r W W f `a s Hill O --------t--- O L Q ~59y~ gL6 ~0o o «i - - o, 0 06 3 J a# LL. '.3 -g---- - - - O u - - - - - o- - f s a - 4 k © Oa 0 O Q LU W u O LL 00 za OZ o O~ QNu =W U- -JO W f ~d F Sul e a~73~ a n .nb f P of ~P i i fQ 6" i6 p~p[ °s~ 6 ® ee 33 0 ESp £ >a E3 z 9 8 0 J O ® o ® ® m ❑ 'm JZI 4❑ o E--1 c _ N e LL ° ° ° °p$ Z > r~ P9a r B W p J W ^ f 8 ® - W d~ a LLU O - ® 0 0 0 0 0 B© J ® Z W C] O Q ❑ © W Q Cl El- ❑ H a ❑ 8 00 8 ❑ _ n r- a 00 ~ - u~ Z os e J_ 5 ® D 00 ti 2' 4 t 2 a Se'. . 3 m E:J 's 2 O O = F rr-I F, A > N ' W LJ M ❑ W u z Q ❑ f c )LL F ❑ a O ~O > 8 ❑ W W -j J Za LOL, o Z O ~ u g 8 Cl =W ❑ a ❑ wo Cl -EF 8 o a a ❑ ❑ ❑ INN e93i4 Q 4 :Q Q :k ~ y W = 9 k11jj y 3~ ~ ' - b t gV s I$ ~ ~ a Z z a 3 9a §6 a JZ3 7 ~ ' O ® O ® 9 E~ m ❑ m Q ® ❑ O a N 5 Q❑ e ® El r $ Z: AM E3 > a 3~ o- W e f p W W o 9# .F e ¢ a 0 9 a~ w ® W F, --e B O O O O© FEI W j Q O Cl ❑ ® _ W Q 8 E3 X~ Fl © u7 3 00 8 8 iv s u„ Z: - o J ~ 8 m k e C7 ' O ® ..e s .o gR r4~ lV3 ~3 c.:age.4.~ O ? E:3 j ¢ s;; o J j p ~ m m = Z O O a Q > W j El j W u O = a ❑ oLL- LL. 7 ❑ ; 0 O OW 8 ❑ WJ OZ OQQ JO U ¢V1 Cl Cl -E-1 3:LQg ❑ CI ❑ JO w Q :cv CA ~n W Cl ❑ a ❑ § = ED ® 9p i§s`st W Q 1 s §A 3. ® i ® o ~g -ma z z mF 3nn .a o Q ❑ a o® o ©i~ ' oo Q g JE1 0 a I W Q W 6 it p ® ® V1 W = S g i7.6 eg~C Q yLj S 0 0 o a o© J W E3 Q~ EZI ® O 8 8 - ® e H -Cj 8 ❑ 9 Q ❑ = En P Sf, U e J a 00 a 2 F e `4 e .-a .a p13 ❑ ❑ z EA ❑ J 6 ~ f9 C3 ❑ _ C o EA ❑ a ❑ Q m Q 8 0 z ® x 8 0 a ® w o 8 w 8 8 OLL _ r ~O 3 Z<2 0 o- C1 8 ZZ o o 0~ J 8 El J vii `a' 8 =LL WO W 8 9:J = 0 G. r i va PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA06-0205, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT THREE PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS TOTALING 64,640 SQUARE FEET IN THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6), AND PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA08-0273, A MINOR EXCEPTION TO ALLOW FOR A REDUCTION IN PARKING, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF TEMECULA PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY A 425 FEET EAST OF JEDEDIAH SMITH ROAD (APN 959-060-007) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 31, 2006, Jim Griffin filed Planning Application No. PA06-0205, a Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. On December 2, 2008, Jim Griffin filed Planning Application No. PA08-0273, a Minor Exception Application in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on December 17, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA06-0205 and PA08-0273 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: . Development Plan, Section 17.05.0101 A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with the goals and policies. contained within the General Plan. According to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Professional Office Land Use Designation allows for multi-tenant office buildings situated in a landscaped garden setting. This project consists of three two-story office buildings with sufficient landscaping and outdoor amenities consistent with the objectives contained in the General Plan. The project meets all applicable design standards contained within the Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines, and the design of the project meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and all applicable fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of this project, including the site design, building elevations, parking circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project, as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner which will protect the public health, safety and general welfare. Minor Exception, Section 17.03.060.D.2 C. That there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property; The proposed Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex was compliant with the Development Code upon submittal. It was only after the approval of an amendment to the parking standards by the City Council on October 23, 2007 that the proposed project became deficient by ten spaces if all suites would be eventually leased out as medical or dental space. In addition, the site lacks the physical space to incorporate the additional spaces needed to adhere to a strict application of the code. D. The Minor Exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity; The Minor Exception does not grant any special privileges to the applicant. This is because other property owners with similar circumstances may also apply for a Minor Exception. In addition, staff has determined that the Minor Exception is not detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. E. The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone; The Minor Exception does not negatively impact the surrounding properties since it is only comprised of a small reduction in parking spaces. In addition, the Minor Exception does not permit a use that is not allowed within the Professional Office General Plan designation. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application, PA06-0205, a Development Plan to construct three professional office buildings totaling 64,640 square feet in the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) and Minor Exception Application, PA08-0273, a Minor Exception to allow for a reduction in parking: A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Development Plan and Minor Exception Applications. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered Mitigated Negative Declaration (°MND") for the Project, approved by the Planning Commission as Planning Application No. PA01-0522 on July 31, 2002, including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Based on that review, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed Development Plan and Minor Exception Applications do not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report or (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, the Planning Commission also finds that the proposed Development Plan and Minor Exception Applications do not involve significant new effects, do not change the baseline environmental conditions, and do not represent new information of substantial importance which shows that the Development Plan and Minor Exception applications will have one or more significant effects not previously discussed in the MND. All potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed Development Plan and Minor Exception Applications are adequately addressed by the prior MND, and the mitigation measures contained in the MND will reduce those impacts to a level that is less than significant. A Notice of Determination pursuant to Section 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines is therefore the appropriate type of CEQA documentation for the Development Plan and Minor Exception Applications, and no additional environmental documentation is required. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA06-0205, a Development Plan to construct three professional office buildings totaling 64,640 square feet in the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overly (PDO-6) located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately a 425 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road and Planning Application PA08- 0273 a Minor Exception to allow for a reduction in parking, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of December 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SCANNED: G DRIVE: PERMITS PLUS: INITIALS: PLANNER: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application Nos.: PA06-0205 and PA08-0273 Project Description: A Development Plan application to construct three professional office buildings totaling 65,640 square feet in the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overly (PDO-6) and a Minor Exception application to reduce the parking requirements for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex generally located on the north side of Temecula Parkway, approximately a 425 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 959-060-007 MSHCP Category: Commercial DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Class "B" Office Approval Date: December 17, 2008 Expiration Date: December 17, 2010 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One Thousand Nine Hundred Forty Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($1,940.75) which includes the One Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy Six Dollar and Seventy-Five Cent ($1,876.75) fee, required by Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four Dollar ($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the previously approved Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. PL-2. The applicant shall review and sign the Acceptance of Conditions of Approval document that will be provided by the Planning Department staff and return the document with an original signature to the Planning Department. General Requirements PL-3. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-4. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-5. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-6. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL-8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL-9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property ownerto bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-10. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL-11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL-12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Roof Tile Terra Cotta Aluminum Doors and Window Frames Marvin Brown Float Glass Solar Gray Exposed Rough Rafter Beam Tails Dark Brown Primary Stucco Finish # 20 Ivory PL-13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the Site Plan. PL-14. Parking for the project shall be shared across the site, including parking spaces in all lots that are a part of the project. If the project involves multiple lots, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal Use Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots. PL-15. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated July 31, 2006, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-16. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PLA 7. Double detector check valves shall be either installed underground or internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning. PL-18. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the .significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the.Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning." PL-19. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL-20. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL-21. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. PL-22. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. PL-23. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL-24. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-25. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL-26. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL-27. Three copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-28. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL-29. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Two landscape site inspections are required: One inspection is required prior to irrigation line trenches being closed for inspection of the irrigation lines and a separate inspection is required for final planting inspection." PL-30. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-31. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan), and the locations of all existing trees that will be saved consistent with the Tentative Map. PL-32. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-33. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that a minimum of two landscape site inspections will be required. One inspection to verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The applicant/ owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL-34. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Planning. PL-35. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL-36. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL-37. Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PL-38. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-39.. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a Certificate of Use and Occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-40. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping the covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Planning. PL-41. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-42. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-43. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal, displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than 70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following: "Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning (951) 696-3000." PL-44. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least three square feet in size. PL-45. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-46. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL-47. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control District's transmittal dated July 31, 2006, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. PL-48. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated July 25, 2006, a copy of which is attached. PL-49. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated July 27, 2006, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information B-1. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B-2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B-3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B-4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B-5. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B-6. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. B-7. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-8. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-9. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.. B-10. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21, specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays. B-11. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B-12. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B-13. Developments with multi-tenant buildings or shell buildings shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. B-14. Show all building setbacks. Prior to Submitting for Plan Review B-15. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. At Plan Review Submittal B-16. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B-17. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2007 edition of the California Building Code. B-18. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B-19. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B-20. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-21. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-22. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Conditions/Information CS-1. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste containers. CS-2. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. CS-3. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. CS-4. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, landscaping, walls, fences, entryway median, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) CS-5. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. CS-6. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional street lighting, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a looped water system, with two point of connection, capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and off site 6" x 4" x 2-2'/i" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R). F-4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on-site fire hydrants are required (CFC Chapter 5, Section 508.5). F-5. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Paved access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410. 1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F-8. The gradient forfire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.7. and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-9. The developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and Chapter 5, Section 501.3). F-10. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F-11. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-12. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E. F-13. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section Q. F-14. A "Knox-Box" shall be provided for each building. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506). F-15. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.3). F-16. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD-1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD-2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. PD-3. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD-4. All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting Ordinance, California Government Code 8565. PD-5. All exterior lighting to be in compliance with Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. PD-6. All exterior doors to have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above each door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD-7. All exterior night lighting shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD-8. Applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1000 in accordance with Section 8565 of the California Government Code. PD-9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD-10. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. PD-11. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion.All multi-tenant offices/ suites/businesses located within a specific building, shall, have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD-12. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". PD-13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD-14. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. PD-15. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department. PD-16. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict.. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. PW-3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. PW-4. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW-5. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post-construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. PW-6. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil engineer and include site design Best Management Practices, (BMPs) source controls, and treatment mechanisms. PW-7. Approval from Metropolitan Water District shall be obtained for any work within their easement PW-8. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association or property owner. PW-9. The vehicular movement for Temecula Parkway shall be restricted to a right in/right out movement. PW-10. The applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Rancho Community Church (PA00-0470) as approved on September 24, 2002. PW-11. The applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 30798 (PA02-0562) as approved on April 24, 2003. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-12. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW-13. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW-14. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW-15. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking, earthquake fault zone, and liquefaction. PW-16. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer. PW-17. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW-18. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW-19. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW-20. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-21. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW-22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. PW-23. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. PW-24. The developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NO[) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-25. Prior to the first building permit, a fault hazard investigation shall be approved by the Riverside County Geologist. PW-26. Precise Grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveway shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207A c. Streetlights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number 800. d. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400. e. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees. f. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. g. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 34kv or greater, shall be installed underground. PW-27. The Developer shall pay a mitigation fee in an amount acceptable to the Department of Public Works. Said fee shall reflect the percentage of impact at each intersection and shall be in accordance to the traffic impact analysis dated May 17, 2002. PW-28. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. PW-29. Improve Temecula Parkway (Urban Arterial (6 lanes divided) Highway Standard No. 100A-134' R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) PW-30. The developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approach; streetlights, sewer and domestic water systems; under grounding of proposed utility distribution lines; and storm drain facilities. PW-31. The developer shall vacate and dedicate the abutters rights of access along Temecula Parkway pursuant to the new location of the driveway. PW-32. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. PW-33. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and reviewed by the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City Council for dedication of the City where sidewalks meander through private property. PW-34. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW-35. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. PW-36. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. PW-37. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-38. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW-39. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW-40. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-41. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW-42. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. WARREN D. WILLIAMS qua nr rrn 1995 MARKET STREET 3eneral Manager-Chief Engincer aQ+~°~ ~Onoy RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX 511802 r~N`rfTITl4W°~S RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL C,,7 ~ ~ t AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of Temecula Planning Department gj `I j~ + j r Post Office Box 9033 2006~ Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Gt4aSN-Ir IC Vh-" ao iar^dr::; ;-aaarirnent Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: PAob - crcos The Disbict_does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical, component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District has not reviewed the Proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approva or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issue: No comment. _ X This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required. Th is pro ject proposes channels, stone drains 36 inches or larger in diameter or other facilities that could be considered regional m nature arldlor a topical extension of the adopted Master Drainage PI n..The District would consider acre ting ownership o su as i Ies on wn en reques of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection veil be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be r q euired. - This project is located within the limits of the District's Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; app ice a ees s ou pal y ces Ie s check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. - An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination stem (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or otherSfinal approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA mapped flood plain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision ((CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior fo occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the Califomia Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, t~ < ARTURO DIAZ Senior Civil Engineer c: Riverside County Planning Department Date:_ aG Attn: David Mares !4M COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • HEAD t t SERVICES AGENCY N 1 N16, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH July 18, 2006 f City of Temecula Planning Department IE C F" W E. P.O. Box 9033 D Temecula, CA 92589-9033 JUL 2 5 2006 Attention: Christine Damko RE: Development Plan No. PA06-0201 BY Planning Department Dear Ms. Damko: Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the development plan to construct three professional buildings totaling 65,880 square feet north of Highway 79. Although, the site plan does not indicate that either water and sewer services exist, we assume that these services are in and are available. 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD BE REQUIRED: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water district. b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food Facility Plan Examiners at (951) 461.0284. c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (951) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: ♦ Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4. Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3. ♦ Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2). ♦ Waste reduction management. Sincerel , Martinez upervi g Environmental Health Specialist (951) 955-8980 NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Huildmg Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. cc: Doug Thompson, llazardous Materials - Local Enforcement Agency • PO. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280' • (909) 955-8982 FAX (909) 781-9653 • 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 July 27, 2006 Christine Damko, Project Planner F ~'flp~ffl City of Temecula a°C ~~1oIffYYllwwWW Planning Department JUL 3 1 2006 MIN M Post Office Box 9033 ,t Temecula, CA 92589-9033 0 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY -Board of Directors Ben B. Drake PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS President PARCEL NO. 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 30798 Stephen J. Carona APN 959-060-007; CITY PROJECT NO. PA06-0205 Sr. Vice President Ralph H. Daily [COVENANT DEVELOPMENT, INC.] Lisa D. Herman John E. Hoagland To Whom It May Concern: Michael R. McMillan William E. Pimmner Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, officers. therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off- Brian J. Brady site water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD General Manager and the property owner. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to Phillip L GenForbes eral Manager / contact RCWD for fees and requirements. Assistant General Chief Financial OBicer P. Mob- Lemoas Dirertorctor.f ofEngineering Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Perry B. Lonck Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. The Drectarof Planning project should be conditioned to use recycled water for landscape irrigation. Jeff D. Armstrong Controller Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. Rem F. Garcia - District Secretary This project has the. potential to become a commercial condominium Best B st&Krriiegerr.r.P development, with individual :building owners and an Owner's Association General cannaal maintaining the common property and private water, fire protection and landscape irrigation facilities. As a condition of approval for the project, RCWD requires that the City include a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for these on-site private water facilities. In addition to this agreement, RCWD would require individual water meters for each condominium unit. . If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DIST CT Mic ael G. Meyerpeter, P.E. Acting Development Engineering Manager cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor 06\MM:at252\FEG Rancho California Water District PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO.08- A RESOLUTION OF THE' PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17.22 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE FOR A ZONING AMENDMENT TO ADD PLANNING AREA C TO THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07-0309)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 17, 2008 the Planning Commission identified a need to amend the adopted Municipal Code to add a new chapter to the Temecula Municipal Code regarding the Zoning Amendment to add Planning Area C to the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) (Planning Application No. PA07-0309). B. The Ordinance was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the application and environmental review on December 17, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07-0309 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed amendment to Chapter 17.22 to the Temecula Municipal Code for a zoning amendment to add Planning Area C to the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan in that the criteria for establishing professional office standards identified in the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element. Furthermore, the proposed amendment to Chapter17.22 to the Temecula Municipal Code for a zoning amendment to add Planning Area C to the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay Ordinance directly responds to Goal 1, Policy 1.1 of the General Plan Land Use Element. B. The proposed Ordinance is consistent with the Municipal Code and Development Code for the City of Temecula; The proposed amendment to Chapter 17.22 to the Temecula Municipal Code for a zoning amendment to add Planning Area C to the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Ordinance has been designed to be internally consistent with the Municipal Code and the Development Code in terms of referencing key components of the City's currently adopted clarification of the procedures for modifying approved permits, to make other minor changes and provide and provide for the readoption of Planned Development Overlays Nos. 5 and 6 Ordinance (Ord. 03-04), which applies to the zoning and development standards of Planned Development Overlays 5 and 6. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Ordinance No. 08- (Ordinance Regulating Planned Development Overlay 6) is exempt from additional requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b) (3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a further significant effect on the environment from what was already studied under the existing Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula adopt a Notice of Exemption for the proposed ordinance. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA07- 0309, a proposed City Ordinance as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 17th day of December 2008. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17 day of December 2008, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CC ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 17.22 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING FOR A ZONING AMENDMENT TO ADD PLANNING AREA C TO THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6) (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07- 0309) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine that: A. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code were processed without a subsequent environmental review per the California Environmental Quality Act due to a previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on December 17, 2008, to consider the proposed amendments at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to the matter C. Following Consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed amendments, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-_, recommending that the City Council approve the proposed amendments to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. D. On the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed amendments had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters, and following receipt of all public testimony closed the hearing Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council in approving the proposed Municipal Code amendments in Planning Application Number PA07-0309 hereby makes the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 ('Relationship to General Plan") of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land use map, or is described in the text of the General Plan; The proposed amendment to PDO-6 is designed to provide development standards for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex and create Planning Area C which will house the development. The amendment is necessary since the PDO currently indicates that a ball field will be placed in the location of the proposed Halcon Rojo site as part of Planning Area A. Medical and business office space is already an allowable use by the PDO and Development Code. In addition, the parcel is designated as Professional Office by the City of Temecula General Plan. B. The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan; The proposed amendments to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code have been reviewed by all appropriate departments to ensure they are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan. C. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein; The proposed amendment to PDO-6 has been reviewed by all appropriate departments to ensure that it will be established and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The City Council hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from additional requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the Ordinance will have a further significant effect on the environment from what was already studied under the existing Mitigated Negative Declaration. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Planned Development Overlay 6 (Rancho Pueblo) as follows in Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6) WITH REDLINES RANCHO PUEBLO . . . PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-6) D a v CC? i Prepared for CITY OF TEMECULA Department of Community Development Prepared by Malkoff and Associates 18456 Lincoln Circle Villa Park, CA 92861 (714) 288-6200 in collaboration with James Benedetti, ASLA Temecula Engineering Consultants Timeless Architecture September 24, 2002 Amended by Lundstrom + Associates One RidQeQate Drive Suite 210 Temecula. CA 92590 (951) 491-6690 Sepieinber 24.2008 AMENDED Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table of Contents 17.22.160 TITLE ...........................................................................................................................6 17.22.162 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................6 A. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ..................................................................................6 B. VISION C. PROJECT AREA ................................................................................................................8 17.22.164 PLANNING AREAS .................................................................................................12 PLANNING AREA A - RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH AND SCHOOLS .................12 PLANNING AREA B - RANCHO PUEBLO PROFESSIONAL CENTER ...........................14 PLANNING AREA C - HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER .................................16 17.22.166 LAND USES ...............................................................................................................18 A. USE MATRIX ...................................................................................................................18 B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS .....................................................................................24 17.22.168 CIRCULATION PLAN ............................................................................................26 A. ACCESS POINTS AND CONNECTIONS ......................................................................26 B. ROADWAY DESIGN AND CROSS-SECTIONS ...........................................................28 C. TRUCK ACCESS D. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION .......................................................................................28 E. PARKING .........................................................................................................................30 F. SERVICE FACILITIES 1. Service. Loading and Delivery Areas ............................................................................31 2. Trash ..............................................................................................................................31 3. Storage ...........................................................................................................................31 4. Utility Equipment ...........................................................................................................31 5. Mechanical Equipment ..................................................................................................31 17.22.170 RECREATION FACILITIES ..................................................................................32 A. PLAYING FIELDS .................................................................................................................32 B. HARD-SURFACE PLAY AREAS ..............................................................................................32 17.22.172 LANDSCAPING ........................................................................................................33 A. GENERAL SITE STANDARDS .................................:....................................................33 1. Highway 79 ....................................................................................................................33 2. Rear (North) Property Line ...........................................................................................36 3. Shared Mini-Plazas .......................................................................................................36 4. Parking Areas 36 5. Storm Drain Channel ....................................................................................................40 6. Water District Easement on West Property Line ..........................................................40 7. Temporary Ground Cover .............................................................................................40 8. Equipment and Service Areas Screening .......................................................................40 B. STREETSCAPES ..............................................................................................................40 Reptemoop ~2 i, 99-9- September 24 2008 AMENDED 2 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) C. ENTRY FEATURES ........47 D. PLAZAS DESIGNS & ELEMENTS E. PAVEMENT FINISHES 47 F. CITY STANDARDS .........................................................................................................47 G. PLANT PALETTE ............................................................................................................49 17.22.174 INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING ...................................52 A. UTILITIES ........................................................................................................................53 B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE .........................................................................................53 17.22.176 DESIGN GUIDELINES ............................................................................................56 A. ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT ..............................................:..................................56 1. Form and Scale ..............................................................................................................56 2. Complexity and Unity ....................................................................................................65 3. Architectural Elements ..................................................................................................65 4. Materials and Finishes ..................................................................................................70 5. Parking Structures .........................................................................................................70 6. Drive-Thru B. ACCENT ELEMENTS .....................................................................................................74 1. Paving, Plazas and Walkways .......................................................................................74 2. Site Furniture .........................74 3. Fountains .......................................................................................................................74 4. Raised Planters C. WALLS AND FENCES ...........78 1. Masonry Stucco .............................................................................................................78 2. Three-Rail ......................................................................................................................78 3. Chain-Link .....................................................................................................................78 D. LIGHTING ..................................78 1. Streets and Parking Areas .............................................................................................85 2. Pedestrian and Wall-Mounted .......................................................................................85 3. Accent 4. Sports Fields ..................................................................................................................85 E. SIGNAGE ..........................................................................................................................85 1. Monument ......................................................................................................................91 2. Building and Tenant Identification 91 3. Pedestrian-Oriented ......................................................................................................93 4. Vehicular Directional Signage ......................................................................................93 5. Specialty ........................................................................................................................93 6. Sign Illumination ...............................................................................................93 7. Commercial Wall Mounted Tenant Signs 93 17.22.178 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES .....................................................................97 A. ADOPTION OF THE PDO ...............................................................................................97 B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS ......................................................97 C. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ........................................................97 D.. AMENDING THE PDO ....................................................................................................97 E. EXPANSION OF THE PDO AREA 98 R"te"'' ^'_Seotember24 2008 AMENDED 3 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) List of Figures Figure I Vicinity Map Figure 2 Study Area 7 Figure 3 PDO Area Map . Figure 4 Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan - Church & Schools ..........................................13 Figure 5A Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan - Rancho Pueblo Professional Center............ Is Figure 5B Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan - Halcon Rojo Professional Center ................17 Figure 6 Circulation Plan ..............................................................................................................27 Figure 7 Roadway Sections ..........................................................................................................29 Figure 8 Landscape Illustrations - Key Map ................................................................................34 Figure 9 Highway 79 Buffer Figure 10 Rear Property Line / Drainage Channel .......................................................................37 Figure I I Pedestrian Gathering Area . Figure 12 Pedestrian Corridor at Parking Area .....................................................•...................38 Figure 13 Rancho Pueblo Ent 39 Figure 14 Rancho Pueblo Interior Section ...................................................................................42 Figure 15 Chapel Lane Entry 43 Figure 16 Chapel Lane Interior Section .......................................................................................44 Figure 17 Rancho Community Church Sign Figure 18 Halcon Rojo Professional Center Ent ...45 Figure 19 Main Church Gathering Plaza Plan ...ry ........................................................................48 Figure 20 Grading Exhibit ............................................................................................................54 Figure 21 Drainage Exhibit Figure 22 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics .................................................................................555 7 Figure 22A Exterior Architectural Aesthetics.............. Figure 22B Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22C Exterior Architectural Aesthetics.. 60 Figure 22D Exterior Architectural Aesthetics ..............................................................................61 Figure 22E Exterior Architectural Aesthetics ..............................................................................62 Figure 22F Exterior Architectural Aesthetics ...............................................................................63 Figure 22G Exterior Architectural Aesthetics ..............................................................................64 Figure 33 Typical Entrance Detail Figure 24A Secondary Entry / Exit Cover B ................................................................................67 Figure 25 Exterior Secondary Entry / Exit Covers Figure 25A Exterior Entry / Exit Covers .......................................................................................69 Figure 26 Exterior Colonnade Figure 27 Exterior Sloped Window Shade Covers Figure 27A Window Detail Figure 28 Typical Planter / Integrated Seat ..................................................................................773 5 Figure 28A Typical Planter / Integrated Seat Detail - Photographic Example . 76 Figure 29 Typical Fountain Detail ...............................................................................................77 Figure 30 Stucco Wall Detail Figure 31 Three Rail Fence Detail September 24, 2008 a„(i C 4 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Figure 32A Parking Lot & Driveway Lighting .....................................................:......................81 Figure 32B Walkway, Plaza & Parking Deck Lighting ...............................................................82 Figure 32C Wall Mounted Lighting .............................................................................................83 Figure 32D Sports Field Lighting .................................................................................................84 Figure 33 Signage Plan .................................................................................................................86 Figure 34 Signage .........................................................................................................................87 Figure 34A Signage ......................................................................................................................88 Figure 34B Under Canopy Signage Figure 35 Church Signage Tower with Electronic Signage Feature ............................................90 Figure 36 Commercial Wall Mounted Signage ............................................................................92 List of Tables Table 17.22.162 Rancho Pueblo Statistical Area Summary I l Table 17.22.166A Matrix of Permitted Uses ................................................................................18 Table 17.22.16613 Development Standards .................................................................................24 Table 17.22.172 Plant Palette .......................................................................................................49 ' 24,2992 September 24, 2oo8 AMENDED 5 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.160 TITLE Within the City of Temecula's Zoning Code (Title 17), Sections 17.22.160 through 17.22.178 shall be known as "PDO-6" (Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.162 PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) helps define a vision for the future development of Rancho Pueblo and serves as a guide to the implementation of that vision over time. This document directs future development to adhere, appropriately, to the overall PDO area vision, thereby ensuring that Rancho Pueblo fulfills its primary goal of positively adding to the collective image of the City of Temecula. Design excellence, coupled with efficient and safe, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, provides an environment with pedestrian-friendly streetscapes and landscaped areas. Special attention will be given to providing architectural and landscape designs that are complementary to the adjacent residential areas. The Rancho Pueblo PDO project area is situated to the southeast of central Temecula, on the north side of Highway 79 South, midway between the intersection with Margarita Road and Jedediah Smith Road, approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with I-15 (Figure 1). The PDO area is currently zoned Professional Office by the City of Temecula and falls within the ZI Special Plan Overlay, as set forth in the City of Temecula General Plan. In accordance with the requirements for a Special Plan Overlay, Rancho Pueblo will be a comprehensively planned development with a complementary mix of uses. The underlying zoning for the PDO area will remain as Professional Office, except as specifically modified herein. In situations where the development guidelines herein do not specifically or completely address an issue, the Temecula City Wide Design Guidelines will apply, so the development guidelines herein are seen as an adjunct to, rather than a displacement of, the City Wide Design Guidelines. B. VISION The name for "Rancho Pueblo" evolved from its origins in the Rancho Community Church and its desire to evoke the look and feel of a village through provision of a more traditionally based pedestrian-oriented environment, blended with the regional Spanish- American heritage. Just as churches provide valuable community models for balancing stability and growth to form the lasting cornerstones of our communities, Rancho Pueblo is to be a model for a well-planned, well-executed and cohesive plan. The presence of Rancho Community Church on the project site will provide a guiding and stabilizing force to the entire development and will provide a new landmark, both literally and figuratively, for the City of Temecula and the entire Temecula Valley. bsr 2 September 24 2008 r 6 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) ~s I I I s I ~ 4 I p ~ ~ ~ THc ClT% OF I9 _ $ I I I R I ~ -T I ~ I OCA 770AT - I g I 79 -50) t- - Imo. c ✓rt~ ~Y 46~fEi u ' t\ v 11 II 1 L _ NO 5G4-r ' I I I - I I I `.f +T ' Iy B I I) I , t I Planned Development Overlav PAO1-0522 Vicinity bfap Figure 1. ~"T-`""'`•y~--2T-~~ SeOtember24. 2008 7 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) The Project forms an attractive and complimentary addition to both the adjacent neighborhoods and the City of Temecula as a whole, by knitting together a tapestry of architectural, landscape, and urban design elements, complementary to the City of Temecula's, City Wide Design Guidelines. The Rancho Pueblo PDO envisages a symbiotic assemblage of possible uses, including a church and its associated administrative and ministerial structures, church-based schools, community-accessible recreational facilities, professional offices, medical support services, and support retail; other uses may include, assisted-living and congregate care facilities, and self-storage facilities. There is a strong emphasis placed on ease of access and pedestrian-friendly circulation within the entire site. In general, parking lots are placed along the central backbone roadway system, with a network of sidewalks, walking paths, and pedestrian corridors designed to facilitate and encourage pedestrian movement, throughout the entire Rancho Pueblo PDO area. The network of pedestrian pathways also connects handicapped-accessible parking areas to the site buildings with additional external site linkages at appropriate points along Highway 79 South. C. PROJECT AREA The Project Area, shown in Figure 2, is defined as Tract Number 121-1. 30793, Lots 1 through 1816, and Tract Number 3079 Lots 1 through 3, totals approximately 53.62 acres and runs along the Highway 79 frontage for approximately 3,700 feet. Site depth varies between approximately 430 and 730 feet from the right-of-way line. The Project Area, collectively known as Rancho Pueblo, will be governed by this Planned Development Overlay, subject to review and approval of the City of Temecula. It is to be a high-quality, regional development, positively enhancing the overall image of the City of Temecula. It consists of twethree-significant and interrelated development areas, delineated as Planning Areas A. B, and 9C in Figure 3. Planning Area A is the new home for the Rancho Community Church and School, anchoring the site in the midwestern portion of the PDO area;. acid-Planning Area B, is-the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, consistsiej of professional offices, support retail, retail, and other appropriate land uses, and occupie~ the eastern portion of the PDO. Planning Area C. also known as the Halcon Rojo Professional Center will also consist of professional offices . u ort retail. retail, and of er e an A statistical summary of acreage for each of the proposed major development areas within the PDO is presented in Table 17.22.162. P4, 2902 seatember24 Zoos AMENDED 8 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N _ DWWM LYNOWI C N Q i p q q K ~ ~T I W ~ b O ~ y = o a ~`4 I q 9 I MMSTONES ~g(3 ~ e pR~ p ,opp 1 ~ gyn S YYY ~1 q ~ o ~ O M a i o 1 O ~o C N J ~ N U d Q 0. , Q~ 0 Z epee -04,2992 Seotember24 2008 AMENDED 9 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) _ OW t» ~o a ~ z 1~ zv , ~ a ~ 4 ^ a a --aff.7~d1 D~ e , 0 ' a a ~ r y I ~ dm a~ "4agy q 4 ~N Z a r io Reptember 4,2002 ' Se24. tember 2008 AMENDED2008 AMENDED i Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6) Table 17.22.162 RANCHO PUEBLO STATISTICAL AREAS SUMMARY'S Planning Area Acreage Square percenta e Footage g A. Rancho Community Church and Schools Development Pad " 4.61 ac 200,908 ;4-.7-913.63 Landscaped Area, Hardsca e and Walkwa s 12.08 ac 526,337 39-9935.70 Public Streets & Drivewa R.O.W. Onl 0.69 ac 30,152 4-7-72.04 Private Street/Driveway Easement 2.07 ac 90,260 5,12 Open Space (sports fields) I fip np 591 984 29.44 6.23 a 271 534 18.41 Projected Parkin Area (footprint onl 8.16 ac 355,353 288424.10 Gross Acreage: 3914ae 1.7994-914 100.00 33.85 ac 1.474.54A Allowable Building square footage 852,457 sf Total Projected Parkin Spaces 1,451 B. Rancho Pueblo Professional Center Development Pad " 3.85 ac 167,812 26.60 Landscaped Area 4.72 ac 205,326 32.55 Public Streets & Driveways R.O.W. ON 2.00 ac 87,347 13.85 Projected Parkin Area (footprint onl 3.91 ac 170.264 27.00 Gross Acrea e: 14.48 ac 630,815 100.00 Allowable Building square footage 315,374 sf Total Projected Parkin Spaces 392 C. Hafcon Rojo Professional Center Develo ment Pad " 0.78 ac 34 159 14.83 Landsca ed Area 1.92 ac 83 547 36.27 Hardsca e Sidewalk and Walkwa s 0.54 ac 23 628 10.26 i Projected Parkin Area foot rint onl 2.04 ac 89,036 38.65 Gross Acrea e: 5.29 ac 230,370 100.00 Allowable Buildin s uare foota e 65 640 sf Total Projected Parkin S aces 245 Rancho Pueblo PDO - total gross acreage: 53.62 ac 2,335,729 Statistics shown, except those for gross acreage by site, are illustrative and subject to revision during subsequent Site Development Plan approvals. Additional 0.25 floor area ratio may be allowed based on enhanced landscape and/or architecture in the PO zone. FAR's are slightly higher for retail and retail-support areas. i Septen9bgr 24 200 2 September 24, 2008 AMENDED t t Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.164 PLANNING AREAS Rancho Pueblo has twethree-major components: the Rancho Community Church and Schools, and-the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center. and the Halcon Roio Professional Center. The Church and Schools project contains worship, ministerial, meeting and educational facilities and associated recreational amenities. The Professional Centers may consist of a combination of professional services, support retail, a sports club and possibly congregate care or self-storage facilities. While the following descriptions of the Church and School, and the Professional Centers are illustrative of a potential mix of uses, the final complexion of the PDO area will be governed by the Matrix of Permitted Uses (see Table 17.22.166A) and subject to the City of Temecula Site Development Plan Review process. PLANNING AREA A - RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH AND SCHOOLS Expected uses for the Rancho Community Church and Schools site include: 1. Religious worship spaces 2. Church administration offices 3. Church ministries and program areas 4. Preschool 5. Elementary school 6. Junior High and High Schools 7. Indoor recreation 8. Recreational playing fields 9. Outdoor hard-surface recreation areas 10. Associated parking areas - structured and at-grade il. Caretaker residences The Church and its associated phased structures are organized, village-style, around a central gathering place, functioning both as a forecourt for the Worship Center and as a place of respite and contemplation for its multiple associated users. The Worship Center, the major, central building of the Church complex, is situated directly on the main gathering place, towards the front of the site to help decrease potential visual impacts, of this large footprint structure, on the residential areas to the rear of the site, and to increase the building's presence on Highway 79 South. The gathering place is further bounded by the Adult Education building, the Chapel and the Family Life Center; the Family Life Center also functions in the early years as the Interim Worship Center. These buildings, in turn, are bracketed by the Preschool, Elementary, Junior High and High School buildings, with the western and eastern ends of the site containing recreational playing fields. Figure 4 illustrates a representative development plan for the site. The only buildings not directly associated with the central gathering place are the Administration building, located close to Highway 79 South, and the two Field Houses adjacent to the east and west sports fields. The Administration Building development pad extends from Chapel Lane to Highway 79 South, adjacent to the Rancho Pueblo Road main site entry, but it is rnber24-~2 Seotember24. 2008 AMENDED 12 i Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO.6) i} i 0 4 0 .4 vv may. J y 11~•'•r ~ o yy~VlY of ,ins o+ Nye' Mr 1O4 C r Y, r ~I C Q 331 _i I j!'i~4~ Nb.3 p310+3 f ~ (r5;.':IIIIII~ f2 3 - ' seotamber24 Zoos AMENDED 13 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) accessed from within the Church and Schools site, via Chapel Lane. Depending on Church, office space requirements, this building may accommodate multi-tenant, non-Church related uses. Efficient use of land is maintained throughout the site by use of sharing of reciprocal parking between the Church and non-Church uses, with the overriding and dominant peak demand being weekend worship services. Temporary modular units are allowed for interim school uses. Such units must have landscaping to soften views of the modulars from off-site areas, and must be phased out over time. Construction trailers are allowed, without landscaping. PLANNING AREA B - RANCHO PUEBLO PROFESSIONAL CENTER The site may contain a well-coordinated mix of professional office and other use types, including: 1. Medical and Professional Office 2. Self.-storage facilities 3. Assisted Living facilities 4. Senior Living facilities The site is organized around the central main street, Ranch Pueblo Road, which traverses the middle of the site, from its western terminus at Highway 79, shared with the Rancho Community Church and Schools site to the west, to its interim eastern terminus at the PDO eastern boundary; secondary access is also provided via the right-in right-out road connecting to Highway 79 at the eastern boundary of the site. In addition, a connection for Rancho Pueblo Road to the east is provided in Planning Area B. Development parcels are located along and accessed from Rancho Pueblo Road, which bisects the site in an east-west direction. Some access may also be provided, at a suitable distance from Highway 79, from the right-in, right-out access road connecting to Highway 79, at the eastern end of the site. Parcels along Highway 79 have their front yards, with appropriate setbacks, designated along Highway 79, while the parcels to the rear of the site front onto Rancho Pueblo Road. Main entries of buildings, especially those along the Highway 79 frontage, will be oriented towards the interior of the site to keep the amount of parking on the exterior boundaries of the site to a minimum. Buildings fronting onto Highway 79 will be variably setback and spaced along the right-of-way line to provide a combination of visually interesting relationships with respect to access and movement of vehicles and pedestrians within the site. Whenever possible, cluster groups or pairs of buildings around shared, central courtyards to promote a more village-like atmosphere. Figure 5A illustrates a representative development pattern, while Figure 11 (see Section 17.22.172.A.3), illustrates how the shared landscaped areas can as pedestrian gathering places, serving adjacent buildings. SevtPFnbeg 24,2992 September 24, 2008 AMENDED 14 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) N d F-: w OQULYIYCPA flint 117 -9- - d -r] L~ ~ HUI, - - avao n®La ~aLo °z 092 Seotember24 2008 AMENDED 15 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) PLANNING AREA C - HALCON ROIO PROFESSIONAL CENTER The site may contain a well-coordinated mix of professional office and other use types. including: 1 • band Professional Office r.__,.~ a 3. Pharmacv The site is organized around the project entrance from Highwav 79 at the southeast corner of the site: secondary access is provided from the adjacent sports field driveway also in the southeast corner of the site. The roiect entry is right-in right-out from Hiahwav 79. The professional office buildings will be clustered in the center of the site. with parking areas located around the perimeterr, of the site as illustrated in Fieure 5A The main entries of the buildings will be oriented towards a central entrance courtvard and vehicular roundabout area. The circular drivewav. or roundabout, will also be used as a drop-off or loading area for patients. Commercial loading areas shall be provided for each building and shall be located in roximity to the building it serves. Buildin-s fronting onto Highwav 79 will be variably setback and spaced alona the right-of-way line to provide a combination of visually interestin relationships with respect to access and movement of vehicles and pedestrians within the site Whenever possible. cluster grow s or airs of builctngs around shared central courtyards to promote a more village-like atmosphere. Figure 11 (see Section 17.)').172.A.3), illustrates how the shared landscaped areas can act as pedestrian gathering places serving adjacent buildings Seotember24.2008 AMENDED 16 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 4 o _ ad. ~ r t5 ° I ~ c o u $ / 0. r~ o i / l \ h cP ~l l *41 i i U O 2 S r' ~c Seotember24 2008 AMENDED 17 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.166 LAND USES A. USE MATRIX The land uses listed in the following table will be permitted in the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (RPPDO), only as indicated. Where indicated with a letter "P" the use will be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use will be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with the symbol the use is prohibited within the Rancho Pueblo PDO Area. Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES A Adult business - subject to Chapter 5.08 of Temecula Municipal Code Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios C (less than 5,000 s q. ft.) Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios C (greater than 5,000 s q. ft.) Affordable Housin C Ai orts Alcoholism or dru treatment facilities C Alcohol and dru treatment (out atient) p Alcoholic bevera a sales _ Ambulance services _ Animal hos ital/shelter _ Anti ue restoration _ Anti ue sales _ A arel and accessor sho s A liance sales and re airs (household and small appliances) Arcades( inball and video ames) Art su 1 stores Auction houses Auditoriums and conference facilities C Automobile dealers (new and used) Automobile sales (brokerage)-showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display Automobile repair services Automobile rental Automobile aintin and bod sho Automobile salva a azds/im and azds Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash Automotive oil chan e/lube services with no major re airs Automotive arts-sales Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine - with or without an automated car wash Septemhe;24, 2002 Seotember24 2008 18 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't B Bakery, goods distribution Bakery, retail p Bakery, wholesale Banks and financial institutions (without drive-thru lanes) p beauty sho s p Baffilliard kih drive-thru lanes) C kfast s, rentals, services) r/ ool hall ooks and similar ublications p Bl ood bank p Blueprint and du licatin !and! cp Bookstores p Bowling alley Building material sales (with exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 rcent of total sales area) Building material sales (with exterior storage/sales areas less than 50 _percent of total sales area) Butcher shop _ C Cabinet shop Cabinet shops under 20,000 s q. ft. - no outdoor storage _ Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) _ Candy/confectionery sales p Car wash, full service Carpet and rug cleaning ices s p se and sales MComnimunications idences C facilities ions and microwave installation C Communications aui ment sales p -Community care facilities p .Computer sales and servicing p Con re ate care housing for the elderl p Construction equipment sales, service or rental Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental Convenience market Costume rentals Crematoriums Curie September 24 2008 19 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't D Data processing equipment ands stems P Da care centers P Delicatessen P Discount/de artment store Distribution facility Drug store/pharmacy P Dr cleaners P Dr cleaning plant E Emergency shelters C Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) F Feed and rain sales Financial, insurance, real estate offices P Fire and police stations P Floor covering sales Florist sho P Food rocessin Fortune tellin , s iritualism, or similar activity Frei ht terminals Fuel stora a and distribution Funeral arl-r- mortuary Furniture sales Furniture transfer and storage G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service _ Gas distribution, meter and control station _ General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 s q. ft. _ Glass and mirrors, retail sales Governmental offices P Grocer store, retail Grocer store, wholesale Guns and firearm sales H Hardware stores Health and exercise clubs C Health food store C Healthcare facility P Heliports Home and business maintenance service Hos itals C Septetembe' 2992 Seotember 24 2008 20 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliililI III! Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't . I Ice cream parlor P fm pound and Interior decorating service P J Junk or salvage yard K Kennel L Laboratories (film, medical, research or testing centers) C Laundromat Laundry service (commercial) Libraries, museums and galleries C Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution Li uorstores Lithographic service Locksmith P M Machine shop Machinery storage yard Mail order businesses P Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed building _ (no outside storage), such asjewelry, furniture, an objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing. assembling, and repair processes that do not involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products that require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi-refined products requiring further processing or manufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage _ Massa e Medical a ui ment sales/rental P Membershi clubs, or aniza[ions, lodges C Mini-stora a or Mini-warehouse facilities C Mobile home sales and service Modular Classrooms/buildings C Motion icture studio Motorc cle sales and service _ Movie theaters Musical and recordin studio N Ni htclubs/tavems/bars/dance club/teen club Nurseries (retail) Nursing homes/convalescent homes C September g" i2002 September 24 2008 21 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't . O Office e ui ment/su lies, sales/services p Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but P not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance P Paint and wallpaper stores Parcel deliver services Parkin lots and parking structures C Pawnshop Personal service shops P Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop Photographic studio P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) Postal distribution Postal services P Printin and ublishin (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) C Private utilit facilities (Re Mated b the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices p Radio/television transmitter Recreational vehicle arks Recreational vehicle sales Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building G Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage - exterior and Rec clin collection facilities Recycling processing facilities -Religious institution, without day care or rivate school C -Religious institution, with a private school C -Religious institution, with day care C Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or C industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business) Omiit ential, multiple-family homing urant, drive-in/fast food urants and other eatin establishments p urants with loun a or live entertainment sung ort uses P and boardin houses S ' ' , 9992 Sept ember 24 2008 22 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (POO-6) Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't S Scale, ublic Schools, business and rofessional C Schools, rivate (kinder arten throw h Grade 12) C Schools, religious (kindergarten through Grade 12; and, seminar) C Scientific research and development offices and laboratories C Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care) P Solid waste disposal facility Sports fields (with or without related school use) C Swa Meet, entirely inside a permanent building Swap Meet, outdoor Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales T Tailor sho P Taxi or limousine service _ Tile sales _ Tobacco shop _ Tool and die-casting - Transfer, moving and storage - Trans ortation terminals and stations _ Truck sales/rentals/service _ TV/VCR repair _ U -Upholstery shop V Vending machine sales and service W Warehousin distribution Watch re air P Weddin cha els C Weldin sho Weldin su 1 and service (enclosed) Y Reserved Z Reserved Notes: 1. All antennas will be masked or incorporated into approved structures or other surfaces, subject to City Design Review and City Antenna Ordinance. 2. All congregate care and senior housing residential projects will use the development and performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions contained in City of Temecula Zoning Code Section 17.06.050.H. 3. See City of Temecula Zoning Code Section 17.080.050(R), special use regulations and standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse facilities. Seofember24 2008 23 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table 17.22.166B RANCHO PUEBLO PDO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Develo ment Standard PDO-6 Minimum ross acrea a er Plannin Area 5 acres Tar et floor area ratio 0.25 Maximum floor area ratio (includin bonuses) 0.50 Front ard adjacent to street: Hi hwa 79 South 20 feet Rancho Pueblo Road 20 feet Chapel Lane 20 feet Other Service and Access Roads 10 feet Front Yard adjacent to residential) zoned property 25 feet Interior side yard 10 feet Rear yard 10 feet Accessory structure side/rear yard setback 5 feet Minimum building separation: One story IS feet Two stories 20 feet Maximum building height: Two stories 40 feet Large meeting hall/auditorium structures (with high- 45 feet ceiling single story onions to their structures) Parkin Structures 45 feet Temporary modular buildings 15 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 50 percent Minimum required landscape open space (including 25 percent hardsca a and walkways) sin le lot Minimum net lot area e feet Develo ment Standard T2Ofeet Tar et floor area ratio Maximum floor area includin bonuses) Minimum width at e uied front setback area t Minimum de th t Minimum fronta a on street Front ard adjacent to street: Hi hwa 79 South o Pueblo Road Cha el Lane Other Service and Access Roads 10 feet Front Yard adjacent to residential) zoned property feet Sejetembqr94, 2002 Seatember 24. 2008 24 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.166B RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES con't Interior side and 10 feet Rear and 10 feet Accessory structure side/rear and setback 5 feet Minimum building separation: One story 15 feet Two stories 20 feet Maximum building height: Two stories 40 feet Large meeting hall/auditorium structures (with high- 45 feet ceiling single story portions to their structures) Temporary modular buildings 15 feet Parkin Structures 45 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 50 ercent Minimum required landscape open space (including 25 percent hardsca a and walkways) Fence, hedge or wall - maximum hei ht 6 feet Accessory building - maximum height 15 feet Notes: 1. All structures except Worship Center, Chapel, Family Life Center (containing high-ceiling, single story spaces) and Parking Structure. 2. For purposes of this PDO document, Worship Center, Chapel, Family Life Center (containing high-ceiling, single story spaces) and Parking Structure fall into this category. 3. Parking structures of two stories, S;eptg""woe September 24 2008 AMENDED 25 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.168 CIRCULATION PLAN A. ACCESS POINTS AND CONNECTIONS In total, there are four vehicular access points into the PDO along Highway 79, with a fifth (future) access point planned to the east, directly onto Margarita Road, through the easterly adjacent parcel, which is outside of this PDO (Figure 6). The major, centrally located, PDO entry point is at Rancho Pueblo Road, opposite Avenida De Missiones (presently known as Constance B), with a second access point, directly into the Church and Schools site at Chapel Lane, presently Constance A; both these intersections are planned to be full-movement and signalized. There are two additional secondary access points, limited to right-in/right-out movements only, at the eastern and western ends of the PDO, providing access directly to the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center and the Halcon Rojo Professional Center/Rancho Pueblo Sports Center respectively; these intersections will not require traffic signals. Circulation for the PDO area centers along Rancho Pueblo Road, which acts as the symbolic thoroughfare for the development, forming a central element about which various building clusters are organized and from which they are accessed. Access to all the development parcels is gained from this street, which runs from the main PDO entry at the intersection with Highway 79 South, opposite Avenida De Missiones, via an internal site traffic circle, to the easternmost boundary of the PDO area. Within the PDO Area, Rancho Pueblo Road terminates at this eastern boundary, but allows for its future extension through the property immediately to the east, and thence, via connection to Dartolo Road, through to Margarita Road north of its intersection with Highway 79 South. The property immediately to the east of the PDO eastern boundary also falls under the Z2 overlay designation and will be required, by the City of Temecula, to have similar development patterns as those established herein and to continue Rancho Pueblo Road to connect across to Dartolo Road. Rancho Pueblo Road then provides, in its fully completed form, a parallel reliever road to Highway 79, for site traffic wishing to enter and leave the site headed to and from Margarita Road and Redhawk Parkway. By far the most dominant element of the PDO is the Rancho Community Church and Schools site, which occupies the majority of acreage within the PDO. It is accessed via, and located along, Chapel Lane, which itself runs from Highway 79 South at what is presently Constance A, to its intersection with Rancho Pueblo Road at the traffic circle within the PDO area. Chapel Lane then serves as a meandering backbone for the Church and Schools campus, connecting the main buildings and pedestrian spaces with their associated parking areas and site entries. The street will be curvilinear, generally reducing vehicular speeds across the site, particularly adjacent to the school buildings and drop-off zones which are, in turn, appropriately separated and placed close to their respective schools. QPrGte bpr_04,.P992 September 24, 2008 AMENDED 26 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) ~tiirl~ WW II41 ~ f Y o 1 I eD ~yw 11 0 51 Liu" u 1~'`r ,IY A O m 3 91 _l i~~l A ~ p~m t Nag ) y m m 1 I i z.. Y B o ^al L.t ~l t-~I gal ,I ~ !W +l ~J A i 00^"4cp Q 2 Z O f t; ~Eg i ~30v f ~ I ! cGx I GG=a< p~oo~ o -I - ;'>t' s~ 1 I Heel o e ~ o <mOC W W IA, I l l.. l JS < m U ~ W I~ V ~r 11 Z i r I O I I I I f~ ii r ~Wy i. I geptembeF seotember242008 AMENDED 27 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) A secondary internal site road extends northerly from Chapel Lane west, of its intersection with Rancho Pueblo Road, along the northern site boundary, and terminates again on Chapel Lane to the west of the Campus buildings, providing access and service to the rear portion of the site. New internal site roads named within the Rancho Pueblo PDO are subject to City site plan reviews and approvals. B. ROADWAY DESIGN AND CROSS-SECTIONS Design of site roadways adequately accommodates anticipated associated traffic volumes in accordance with the recommendations of the Traffic Impact Analysis. Figure 7 shows the individual roadway sections, while Section 17.22.172.8 describes street landscaping details. C. TRUCK ACCESS Trucks requiring access to the PDO predominantly consists of trash pick-up, service and delivery vehicles, with special event and moving vehicles entering on a less frequent basis. Truck access is via the main site entries along Highway 79, at both Rancho Pueblo Road and Chapel Lane, and then, in the case of the Church and Schools campus, from these roads onto a rear service road that loops around the buildings along the northern property line (Figure 6). In the case of the non-Church development, individual development parcels and buildings are accessed and serviced from Rancho Pueblo Road through individual site driveways and parking aisles. D. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Clearly defined pedestrian pathways will facilitate pedestrian movement across and throughout the PDO area. Situated along streets and connecting with building areas, these pathways will be a combination of naturally and architecturally shaded walkways, small intimate seating areas, building arcades and connections to building entries, all designed to promote and encourage pedestrian use. Small "gathering" and seating areas will be placed in conjunction with pedestrian pathways either at the intersection of pedestrian pathways with other pathways and roadways, or adjacent to buildings. Locate and design these "gathering" areas in a contemplative, "oasis" style, promoting a restive quality to their use (see Figure 11 in Section 17.22.172.A.3). Main pedestrian access pathways traverse the PDO area, parallel to, and adjoining, Rancho Pueblo Road, and connecting through the Church and School site along Chapel Lane, to the recreation areas and the Halcon Roic Professional Center to the west (see Pedestrian Path on Figure 6). A system of landscaped, pedestrian-friendly, feeder paths will connect the major east- west pathways with the Church and School's central gathering place and with all of the associated buildings, parking and recreation areas. They will also connect, through the parking areas, to the individual buildings or groups of buildings along Highway 79 and will be developed as part of individual building sites, also allowing for connection between buildings via the shared landscape areas (see Figure 11 in Section 17.22.172.A.3). Qept..,. .24, 209-2 September 24, 2008 AMENDED 28 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N ri N 4 0 z ~z ¢ W m s a m 3 tj T `c~ ~oU z ~ C•a a Fea m O cnn Z ' mN ~ T gp 7 ~ y~ @gs ~y O o ~zzz J ZS $a !°a B ` z zyl 8 ppQ 0.1 CS <W a z 3333 / tl x- 1 O IA W xU_ W - U c woN = W V pya, ~ 1~ "1m O J~ ~=J c ; U _ U u NI ~ U N 7 y \ 1 Q dd N I #i Z j~ o O yz W T U VWI - w Ug h 4 U o x cv ~ ~5 o PE x v Z W W s -1 F gg 3 0 m a d O w - 1 p~ V -~~`yonrc m O to ti o aJ 9" ! z w Y ^r 3 ~g - N yaJj ~ = W O j C1 ~ N ~ ~ ZQU V ~ a Z ~ U LL' o - m ~ ~ LL g m September 9002 September 24 2008 AMENDED 29 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Pedestrian entry to the PDO Area from the sidewalk along Highway 79 may be provided at each vehicular traffic entry point and at suitable points in between. Additional pedestrian connections will be developed within and between adjacent land uses, and allow for future extension into the development immediately east of the PDO. Internal, site pedestrian pathways may only cross the main entry roadways at the interior intersection of Rancho Pueblo Road and Chapel Lane, and at the intersection of Rancho Pueblo Road and the secondary right-in/right-out access road at the eastern site boundary. Additional crossings at the intersection of these roads with Highway 79 and within the landscape buffer zone alongside Highway 79 are permissible, but no crossings are permitted in between the Highway 79 landscape buffer zone and the major internal road intersections. Textural and/or colored surface changes will identify all pedestrian roadway crossing points. The main pedestrian area in the PDO, the Church and School's central, gathering place, is designed with both hard-surface and soft-surface landscaping and furniture elements, affording a variety of open and shaded pedestrian environments. Both larger informal outdoor gatherings, such as after Church services, and small, intimate settings for conversation and relaxation will be accommodate in the design; the anticipated future Sanctuary capacity of some 3,500 people must also be accommodated in this gathering place. Access to parking is from Rancho Pueblo Road and secondary site internal roadways using a minimal number of entry points, promoting pedestrian movements along the street-side pedestrian pathways throughout the PD013. E. PARKING Parking areas will be provided throughout the PDO reasonably close to the use that they serve, with opportunities for shared and reciprocal parking arrangements encouraged to lessen the total amount of land devoted to parking. Along the Highway 79 South frontage and at the rear of the site, where the site abuts existing residential areas, parking will be kept to a minimum. Standard and van-accessible handicapped-accessible parking and bicycle stands will be provided at convenient locations throughout the site, especially adjacent to the School buildings and Worship Center. Access to parking areas is directly from Rancho Pueblo Road, Chapel Lane or the secondary service driveways at points that minimize potential interference with cars traveling on Rancho Pueblo Road and Chapel Lane (see Figures 4 & 5). Entry roads from Highway 79 South will be designed with circulation and stacking distances in mind, avoiding any potential back-ups and other adverse impacts on the public highway. Internal parking area driveways will provide direct vehicular access in close and obvious proximity to the main building entries that they are serving. Sharing of parking driveways between adjacent land use is encouraged. Soften the impacts of parking areas through use of shade trees and appropriate ground plantings that are integrated with clearly delineated, landscaped, pedestrian pathways, providing people with direct links to the buildings (See Landscape Section 17.22.172.A.4). Qe Seotember 24 2008 AMENDED 30 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Parking structures up to two stories above-grade are permitted, provided they are architecturally integrated with the other site buildings, designed to minimize their visual impact, and meet the landscape requirements of the PDO design guidelines. There is no limitation on the number of parking levels allowable below-grade. Parking structure faces will be articulated to help reduce the visual impression of the structure. Landscape planter elements will be integrated directly into the architectural design. F. SERVICE FACILITIES 1. Service, Loading and Delivery Areas Location and orientation of service areas and other loading and delivery facilities will keep visual and noise impact to a minimum. They will be walled and screened from view from outside the site and from major internal pedestrian routes and gathering places within the site. Plantings adjacent to the walls to deter defacement of the walls are encouraged. 2. Trash Location and orientation of trash collection facilities will keep visual and noise impact to a minimum. They will be walled and screened from view from outside the site and from major internal pedestrian routes and gathering places within the site. Walls will be masonry with additional structural elements, such as wooden trellises, used to block view over the walls. Place plantings adjacent to the walls to deter defacement of the walls. Use concrete stress pads in front of enclosures to decrease wear on pavement surfaces. 3. Storage Outdoor storage is permitted only in areas specifically designed for that use. Fully screen such areas in a manner consistent with service areas. No service, loading or delivery areas may be used for storage. 4. Utility Equipment Utility equipment will be placed in portions of buildings specifically designed for that purpose or placed underground. Where aboveground placement is unavoidable, place equipment in groupings and screen with walls and landscaping consistent with service areas (Landscape Section 17.22.172.A.8, below). 5. Mechanical Equipment Place mechanical equipment only in areas within buildings specifically designed for that use. When unavoidably necessary to place equipment on roofs ensure screening of equipment from off-site views by structures integrally designed to blend into the building design. Qeptembergl, 2002 September 24. 2008 31 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.170 RECREATION FACILITIES A. PLAYING FIELDS Layout and design of playing fields will conform to City of Temecula, Parks and Recreation Department standards. Field orientation will account for sun-angles, lighting patterns and keeping adjacent residential area impacts to a minimum (see Figure 4). B. HARD-SURFACE PLAY AREAS In recognition of the Schools' needs for both soft- and hard-surfaced play areas, a portion of various parking lots within the Church and Schools site may be utilized as hard-surface play areas. These areas will be coned-off or gated to exclude vehicles when in recreational use. Accordingly, parking areas designated to double as hard-surface play areas will meet special in- lot landscaping requirements allowing for larger, unbroken open areas to accommodate court markings. Additional plantings within island planters and peripheral landscape areas will instead be used to soften views of these hard-surface play areas. Conversely, some areas designated as hard-surface play areas will be alternately used for parking during peak parking periods when not required for recreational use (see Figure 4). Sap t... ber 2 A 2092 Se2tember24 2006 32 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.172 LANDSCAPING Landscaping will be a coordinated design element integrated with, and complementary to, building design. Functioning on both experiential and esthetical levels, landscaping will experientially enhance pedestrian pathway usage by providing shade and a range of textures, patterns, and colors, and aesthetically enhance visual experiences from the interior and exterior of both individual buildings and the entire PDO area. Major landscaping elements, such as trees and monuments, will highlight specific areas within the PDO, with accent trees similarly encouraged as visual clues to peoples' location within the PDO area. A mix of deciduous and evergreen plantings is encouraged to highlight seasonal changes while still maintaining year-round beauty and accent, with attention paid to color, form and scent. All exterior boundaries of the PDO area will be landscaped with multi-storied plantings. Special attention will be given to the interface with the surrounding residential areas where plantings and landscape design will emphasize softening the visual impact of the PDO area from off-site. A. GENERAL SITE STANDARDS 1. Highway 79 Buffers along Highway 79 within the PDO area will continue the precedent patterns established by existing and proposed adjacent developments to the east of the PDO area along Highway 79 South, namely a 36-foot minimum landscape buffer, measuring 20 feet from the property line and 16 feet from the curb to the right-of-way line. Exceptions to this buffer will be for entry signage and monuments at points of access for vehicles and pedestrians, where the buffer incorporates a greater area and depth. Typically, the buffer includes a six-foot wide meandering sidewalk, not less than five feet from the face of the curb along Highway 79 except at and approaching corners (Figures 8 and 9). To address measurable highway and vehicular noise and to promote a quiet, restive ambiance within the Church and School's main areas, a variable two-to-four foot high, shallow-sloped berm (4-foot maximum height for berm) will be topped with an articulated four-to six foot high wall (6-foot maximum height for walls/fences along Highway 79 South), to deflect highway noise and screen parking lot views from Highway 79. The berm and wall relative heights are varied for visual interest when experienced from Highway 79 and the wall will have columns at sixty-foot intervals (see Figure 30). However, the combination of berm plus wall or fence height at any point along Highway 79 South shall not exceed eight (8) feet above adjacent street curb grade. Due to the variety and density of landscaping placed on the Highway side of the wall, most of the wall is eventually expected to be obscured from Highway views. September 24, 2092 Seotember24 2008 33 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N e 1 I _ ~ c Y ~ 2 O N n• _ _ 1 W W 00 o I: ~ c 1l . ~ r 0 ;W S ~~n`emb 2802 September 29 2008 i ' ` 34 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) S MAXNUM COMBINED HEr.NT O / Ir WIDE COLUMN SPACED a Sr O.C. i j / 7-M VAR STAGGERED WA y a 4 -ly/-J a~ ww 7-Y MAX VAR BERM C w BERM AND WALL ALONG HWY 79 W/O PLANTING C ELEVATION u E4TS F a P n o o $ w STREETTREES L `,W/ 9'CaAW WALL 9. SCREEN SHRUM 4 V i~ ACCENT SHRUBS K • :j iii 11 tiil! ~c N BERM AND WALL ALONG HWY 79 W/ PLANTING ELEVATION scut nrs INTEPoOR OF SITE -7-P HXSH STAGGERED WALL a W/rr COLUMNS BUFFER PLANTING r .d2 STREET TREES a _ r yr F - ACCENT PLANTING B MEANDELNO SLUE . V%N FROM CURB MO TO MEANDER WITHIN R.O.W. NXNM/AY 79 HIGHWAY 79 BUFFER PLAN VIEW Se Eruv Septemb September 24 2008 35 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (Poo-6) Elsewhere, the buffer will also contain any necessary acceleration and deceleration lanes, bus stops and their associated seating and shelters, as well as corridors for utility structures including, but not limited to, transformers, back-flow devices, and detector checks. Utility equipment placed in the buffer area will, whenever possible, be placed below grade in accordance with Section 17.22.168.F.5. 2. Rear (North) Property Line A nominal 20-foot buffer along the rear PDO area property line, adjacent to the residential area, will contain plantings and trees to help mitigate off-site visual impacts from parking and buildings in the PDO area (Figure 10). A proposed white, three-rail fence, with integrated chain-link, is placed along this property line for esthetic and safety reasons, due to the proximity of the proposed drainage channel. Plantings, in and around parking areas and adjacent to buildings, will further mitigate off-site views of parking and buildings. Additionally, a 12- foot wide Equestrian trail will be graded to the north of the property line with cooperation of the Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association and the consent of the respective property owners. In areas where the cross-site drainage channel is located the buffer will be reduce in width to five feet, measured from the property line to the top of the channel slope. Plantings may be reduced in areas adjacent to playing fields where visual impacts are at a minimum. 3. Shared Mini-Plazas Where possible adjacent development parcels are encouraged to use coordinated designs to provide shared mini-plazas for common use between the sites. Buildings may be grouped closer together and open space combined to achieve these elements. Such mini-plazas will be in reasonable proximity to building entries and will be connected to the system of landscaped pedestrian pathways that traverse the PDO area. Plazas will have shade trees and seating for informal meetings (Figure I1). 4. Parking Areas Parking lots will include plantings and trees to provide shade and to soften their visual impact, with trees grouped at the end of parking rows, wherever feasible. Large-canopy shade trees will also be placed in planter islands at regular intervals within permanent parking lots in accordance with the city standards. Pedestrian pathways should be clearly identified with a variety of plantings, open and trellis-covered walkways (Figure 12), textures and enhanced surfaces. Plantings and features used to screen and soften permanent parking areas will be balanced with maintaining carefully framed building views into and out from the site. Temporary parking lots, to the extent that overall project landscaping requirements have already been met, may not be required to have landscaping within the lot proper. However, effort should be made to soften views of expansive, temporary parking areas by landscaping. the perimeter of such lot(s). °"r"'""'`'""'" P992 Seotember24 2008 36 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) ~ o o W 04 o ~ 4 w J a Q N4 W N N U ~ =Q G N KW Jas z D J w V ~~m m QO :2~' a N ~ a w a w N Q Z Z F U O N N wV aU eZ o CL. wm 3NIl .IIZ40b14 Q =3 ~ u~ U w N ROw='~ LLJ Q QU epte h ' , 2002 September 24 2008 37 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) i °e a~ w g ~ W o _ U U Ow ~ ~ C L19 , m • C7 y \ Z W LU H pyLU T U as Septa moo September 24. 2008 38 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) h v> 0 1 " 4 5 ti °t Y A rn ARBOR R Q W I ~ iVMCS p o 18 181G WALKWAr IB' I8" W 12 PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR A o C a 0 U 4 z PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR a PARKING AREA a SECTION sca.E NTS ~n W W 4 RARKMG ACCENT VINE ON TRELLIS - 8' HIGH TRELLI5 W/ 12 So. COLUMNS ~i G' WALKWAY v II I 12' MIN. TO `AGE OF CURB 24' 26' MEDIAN W/ ENHANCED PAVIeG _r PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR a PARKNG AREA PLAN VIEW r ' 2902 Seotember 24. 2008 39 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillilillilI III Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 5. Storm Drain Channel A drainage channel, carrying cross-site drainage from areas north of the PDO area to the southwest comer of the PDO area, is located in some areas along the rear and west property lines. Sides and bottom of the channel are covered with a grass mix, except at various important points (channel bends and culvert entries and exits) where rip-rap is used for erosion protection. The channel bottom also contains a concrete channel to control minor irrigation and nuisance (low-flow) run-off. In sensitive locations, such as adjacent to the Church and Schools, an underground concrete culvert pipe replaces the channel. In areas where the channel exists, the rear buffer landscaping is modified to a five-foot strip measured from the property line to the top of the channel slope (Figure 10). 6. Water District Easement on West Property Line Surface of easement will be hydro-seeded with a non-irrigated grass mix to mitigate weed growth and potential dust impact. 7. Temporary Ground Cover Undeveloped site areas graded under previous phases and planned for future development will be hydro-seeded with a non-irrigated grass mix to mitigate weed growth and potential dust impact. Such hydro-seeded areas should be provided with temporary irrigation until such time that the seed mix has germinated and established itself. 8. Equipment and Service Areas Screening Aboveground placements of utility and mechanical equipment, and service areas, will be screened with walls, covers (where appropriate to avoid views down into enclosures), and landscaped in accordance with city standards. B. STREETSCAPES The design of streetscapes provides for clear patterns of ingress and egress, efficient vehicular travel and encourages the safe movement of pedestrian throughout the PDO area. Roadway design will allow for, and integrate, a pleasing pedestrian experience, incorporating both low-level plantings and trees alongside pathways. Landscaping will be used in a hierarchy of plantings to emphasize different locations and uses within the PDO, for instance, one type of street tree for the main thoroughfare, Rancho Pueblo Road, and another for Chapel Lane. Medians greater than a minimum 5 feet clear dimension will be planted with low-level plantings (see Figures 13 through 16 and 18 for street landscape details). 5; r ` 2 2092 Seotember 24 2008 40 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) ~m h 0 I W z srcer eu.DwL o j Q C4CCET OPV TREE 4 [C W r Rd510 XCd4l1 W/ MlF CD tpVNL + C..'RT SiGnLC [.xy _ O (v ~Cd eT A 'y: - ~ P o ea '.^uC ORrvC CMRT VfiiM1 a -or ¢n15C0 YEO<u W/EFrInrvLED R>YNL RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD ENTRY PERSPECTIVE STREET TREES 25' O.C. SPACING R ~ ~ 72 •12'~' 12 12 HIGHWAY 9 I - _ - I TURF 6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK ACCENT GROUND COVER ENTRANCE SIGNAGE ACCENT TRES 4' WIDE RAISED MEDIAN W1 ENHANCED PAVING RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD ENTRY PUN VIEW swe rnu Reptemb^''" 2002 Seotember24 2008 41 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N ~t ~n T -C 'CR14NG l y SGRCEN 4,R M5 COLLfNSP IRCf5 z O 6 51pCWf.Lrt P,I,q ^,vi4 V O Burrs ~ F n oulr c > C •S F sg L( n: T tiS ~ /0A~ S ~ 4 O p 0 0 "L L~-I R e O ~ 2'L p J 4 ~ 6 ~ 1 O RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD SECTION SC ENTS I 9UILDING I I J/ SU, OINO FOUNDATION I I PLANTING 44' COLUMNAR STREET TREES 66' I 30' SETSACX I I S SIDEWALK R.O.W. LINE I - PARKING LOT SCREEN SNRUSS ~AAKING LOT TREES RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD STREET TREES ®I PER 25' PLAN VIEW uiuEr.:o ` PARKING LOT be 2002 September 24 200824 2008 42 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) N ~ Y1 " O Ey I C D V Y u, A"ENT ANOPT TI;EE 12 l 12 % 12 MW TOWER HEWN W/ W/ S' t 9' ELCCTFONC p~ F EI .WM :p RETE PAITIG WNALC ON 25905. ; Z ALLCNT SYFIM pNp - O w GRp Mol R ft"MG5 E 6 A`CNT TIRr 2, S J a i I j GA WJE LRWE EN1RT W" A' C. ANGCD 11VMG ON epppN RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY ENTRY PERSPECTIVE \ i 11 STREET TREES 25' 0 C. SPACING I- II ACCENT TURF , HIGHWAY 79 ACCENT 6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK GROUND COVER 12' X 12' X 12' HIGH TOWER W/ 5' X 9' ELECTRONIC SIGNAGE ACCENT CANOPY TREES DECORATIVE ENTRY PAVING ACCENT SHRUB PLANTING 4' MEDIAN W/ ENHANCED CONCRETE PAVING RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY ENTRY PUN VIEW suu r.m e^"`""'`'^''^ Seotember24 2008 43 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N ~ N O I o ~ i V MAIN SANCTUARY W oZ ACCENT PALM a i 7 PLANTING v F y 94 c a ~ o 4 3 A A' Z ~ L.~L G' 51DEWALK JI L 48 WIDE STREET I y 'J RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY SECTION 3 MAIN SANCTUARY ACCENT PALM PLANTING DROP OFF k LOADING AREA 5~. 1 f GROUND COVER HWY 79 ACCENT SHRUB 6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK SCREEN SHRUBS 2'-4' MAX VAR BERM COLUMNAR STREET TREES 2' -4' VAR. STAGGERED WALL W/ 18' COLUMNS RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY (WALL AND BERM - PLAN VIEW COMBINED 8' MAX HEIGHT S r' "%n~ Seotember24 2008 44 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 47 I Y So ( > i u 0~ ail 4 T y ~ ~ V Ae Q S CY L o ~(J M CH o 6 Z s<' I I ACCENT iRE`S ENTRY SICNAGE -ACCENT GRCUNDCOV_ AND 5HR(J8 °LANTiNO I RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH SIGN PERSPECTIVE Sa ENis t a e INTERIOR OF &7E I, 7 • R HIGH STAGGERED WALL W118' COLUMNS (WALBIL 6 BERM Y i ' MNED HEIGHT a MA.) BUFFER PLANTING ACCENT TREES STREET TREES ACCENT PLANTING i SIGNAGE ACCENT GROUND COVER • MEANDERING SIDEWALK S MIN FROM CURS AND TO MEANDER WRNdN P O.W. RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH SIGN HIG4WAY79 PLAN VIEW 5c rnv I Lmber 1 i2002 Seofember24 2008 45 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) _ v o cn 1¢ w CMM v u [ANpY TREE > HXCON ROSO r `v ENTRY SANME6 G C KCENT SCHRVB- ( 6ROVNW WRKAT-S ly \ L • ~J )J ( Q qvi r r y c t'a`r 0 f0 w C(N trg I°' WEDE DRIVE ENTRY HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER ENTRY PERSPECTIVE . ~ I 1 Y 3, I/~I I Y i HIGHWAY n T" 6' MEANDERENB SMSWKK HAI R0.T0 ENTRANCE SIGN KCENT 6RDUND COVER KCENT TREES HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER ENTRY PLAN VIEW b September 24 Zoos AMENDED AMENDED 46 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) C. ENTRY FEATURES Coordinate landscape design for site entries with architectural features such as lighting, signage, monuments and berm. Use easily identifiable sub-palettes to indicate the differing, hierarchical importance of the various entries, but include some elements that are commonly identifiable to the entire PDO area. Plant appropriate accent ground cover at the bases of all monuments and signage. (See Figures 13, 15, 17, and 18 for landscape entry details). D. PLAZAS DESIGNS & ELEMENTS A hierarchy of pedestrian-oriented plazas will be used throughout the PDO area. Plaza areas will be designed at a scale proportionate to their potential capacity to avoid the appearance of barren, uninhibited spaces, using various elements such as trees, fountains and landscaped planters to creatively dissipate the large groups into smaller components. Use structural landscape elements such as seating, low walls, arbors and trellises, throughout the site at appropriate locations to encourage rest and contemplation. A valuable element will be the inclusion of shaded, seating areas to provide for outdoor, informal meetings and lunch venues, and, in the Church and School site, to encourage fellowship before and after both worship services and during the school day. Large plazas, such as the Church's central gathering place, will receive particular care and will be designed with both hard-surface and soft-surface areas accommodating activities such as resting, gathering, traversing and building ingress and egress. Additionally, such large plazas need to account for the gathering and movement of large groups of people, such as the projected 3,500 churchgoers attending services at the proposed Worship Center, which will implicitly necessitate the use of fairly substantial paved areas. Larger specimen trees will be the focus of the gathering place planted in conjunction with smaller scale plantings to highlight various users of the gathering place (Figure 19). E. PAVEMENT FINISHES Pavement finishes for similar uses will, whenever possible, be consistent and uniform throughout the PDO area. Employ site- and project-specific treatments only at site-specific locations such as mini-plazas, crosswalks and roadway entries as a means of highlighting the different site elements within the PDO. F. CITY STANDARDS Design and construction of all facilities within the PDO area will conform to the design guidelines contained in this PDO. However, where not particularly specified herein, city standards will be used. Qeptem' 24, 2902 Seotember24 2008 47 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N o+ N ~ h o W I C J r: - x+n wvuo p N V3NV i30 doea 4 / r o y C C J.i ~ z a 4 U a ~ J u ~ W I ~ i H a S uG <j { i va u' ( l Cd 24 A. q e r_Seotember24 2008 48 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) G. PLANT PALETTE A hierarchy of plants selected from the Rancho Pueblo Plant Palette (Table 17.22.172), as derived from the City Wide Design Guidelines, will be used to provide variety in conjunction with the varying usage of the different landscaped elements. Project-specific plant palettes must be integrated throughout the Rancho Pueblo PDO, but with allowances made to subtly distinguish one project from the next through changed emphases on grouped plantings. Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE Street Tree - Highway 79 Botanical Name Common Name Platanus acerifolia Plane Tree Schinus molle California Pepper Street Tree - Rancho Pueblo Drive, Chapel Lane Botanical Name Common Name Platanus acerifolia Plane Tree Major Entry Tree and Accent Tree Botanical Name Common Name Arbutus unedo Dwarf Strawberry Tree Arecastrum romanzoffianum Queen Palm Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Parking Lot Canopy Tree Botanical Name Common Name Chitalpa `Pink Dawn" Chitalpa Tipuana tipu Tipu Tree Koelrueteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine Ulmus parvifolia Evergreen Elm Parking Lot Accent Tree Botanical Name Common Name Koelrueteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Magnolia grandiflora Bull Bay Primus `Krauter Vesuvius' Purple Leaf Plum Pyrus Kawakamii Evergreen Pear 39pt-F'`e1,, ' 29 Seotember24 2008 49 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE (con't) Plaza Tree Botanical Name Common Name Arecastrum romanzoffianum Queen Palm Cassia leptophylla Gold Medallion Tree Eriobotrya deflexa Bronze Loquat Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Primus `Krauter Vesuvius' Purple Leaf Plum Pyrus Kawakamii Evergreen Pear Washingtonia Robusta Mexican Fan Palm Background / Screen Tree Botanical Name Common Name Podocarpus gracilior Fem Pine Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay Screen Shrubs Botanical Name Common Name Grevillia noellii Grevillia Ligustrum j. `Texanum' Texas Privet Phorium tenax Flax Photinia fraseri Photinia Rhaphiolepis indica Indian Hawthorne Vibburnum suspensum Sandankwa Viburnum Ornamental Shrubs Botanical Name Common Name Abelia `Edward Goucher' Abelia Arbutus `compacta' Dwarf Strawberry Tree Asplendium bulbiferum Mother Fern Carissa species Natal Plum Clivia miniata Kafir Lily Cotoneaster species Cotoneaster Dietes bicolor Fortnight lily Grevillia Noellii Grevillia Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon Ligustrum j. `Texanum' Texas Privet Phorium tenax Flax Photinia fraseri Photinia Pittosporum species Tobira Rhaphiolepis indica Indian Hawthorne Virbumum suspensum Sandankwa Viburnum September 24 2008 50 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE {con't) Groundcovers Vines Botanical Name Common Name Agapanthus africanus Lily of the Nile Delosprema `Alba' White Ice Plant Hemerocallis hybrids Day Lilies Myoporum species Prostrate Myoporum Pelargonium pelatum Ivy Geranium Rosmarinus `Prostratus' Prostrate Rosemary Trachelospremum jasiniodes Star Jasmine Verbena peruviana Verbena Vines Botanical Name Common Name Disdictis buccinatoria Blood Red Trumpet Vine Parthenocissis tricuspidata Boston Ivy Hardenbergia violacea Happy Wanderer Turf Grass Common Name Dwarf Medalion Tall Fescue Blend Located at all non-sports field areas Hybrid Bermuda Grass Located at all sports field areas (GN-1 by Pacific Sod Company, or equal) 902 Seotember 24 2008 51 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.174 INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING Development of Rancho Pueblo is expected to take place over a number of years, reflecting the congregational growth in the Church and market demand for professional and commercial facilities in the area. While each component of the Rancho Pueblo project may be developed separately, they will do so under the guidelines developed herein and, when needed, the City Wide Design Guidelines. Development may proceed sequentially or concurrently, with each portion contributing piece-by-piece to the overall vision, acting as a microcosm of the way in which a well-planned city develops. Construction of the planned first phase of buildings will begin immediately following initial site grading. The development schedule for the Church and School site is currently planned in five phases. The initial phase is the most extensive, including construction of the Family Life Center/Interim Sanctuary, Chapel, Preschool/Elementary school complex, the first phase of the Administration building, east and west Sports Fields with theif associated western Field afA-Storage building, and construction of two groupings of temporary, modular buildings ('A' and 'B') at the rear and front of the site, respectively. Phase Two, includes construction of the Adult Education building, the first phase of the Elementary School, the second phase of the Administration building, and the eastern Field House and an additional Storage building. The third phase of the Church and School site commences with the removal of the rear ('A'), temporary, modular buildings and progresses to the addition of the High School building, first phase of the Gymnasium, completion of the Elementary School and the final Storage building. Phase Four, begins with removal of the remaining, front-most ('B') temporary modular buildings and continues with the construction of the Middle School and completion of phase two of the Gymnasium. The fifth, and final, phase involves construction of the Worship Center and the necessary, associated, Parking Structure. A high degree of flexibility is designed into the Church project to allow for possible alternative building phasing if the need arises. Should funds be available or needs arise earlier than initially planned, later phases of the Church's development may be accelerated. It is expected that, in contrast to the Church and Schools site, the Professional Center areas to the east and west of the site will develop reasonably quickly in accordance with market dictates. The expected, first phase will be construction of the self-storage facility at the rear of the eastern site followed by Assisted Living an Seaief r g faeilitee the Professional Office on the eastern site, with the final phase being the Medical Office buildings on the western site. Similar to the Church portion of Rancho Pueblo, these areas have a great deal of flexibility allowed in their design to incorporate the diversity of uses permitted. Initial development within the PDO Area shall include the installation of all improvements on both sides of Rancho Pueblo Road from its intersection with SR-79 South to its intersection with Chapel Lane. This includes curbs, sidewalks, and landscape planting design and installation on both sides of the street (for a minimum of 16 feet from the face of curb) and both corner entry statements of Rancho Pueblo at SR-79 South. QeP ` -0992 September 24 2008 AMENDED 52 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) A. UTILITIES Major infrastructure needs within the PDO area will be planned at one time and designed for construction in a manner that will serve both initial and long-term build-out needs. Backbone corridors will be planned and set forth, within dedicated public streets or easements where appropriate, and delineated in concert with the appropriate utility district or other utility purveyor. B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE It is anticipated that, at the time of adoption of this PDO, site grading and associated drainage will occur in a single phase (Figures 20 and 21). Site grading is expected to be one percent minimum fall, with on-site and through-site drainage accommodated in a combination of street storm drains, culverts and overland channels. ° ` September 24 2008 53 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N C N N o p a o a a L ~ IL I .I O G b a V \ ~ I1 n < d IN ,/.i ,y °bx y Sam em 2992 September 24 2008 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) ~ A7 V F\ a ii l` , r y n _ L fKC~~ I ~ v W g J ~ ~ -111. 1.11 c !h } I.r 1 o 1 I Ir_, 1 I~I nh l 3~3 q~q xxqqi ~ ~ p~p 1' 1 110 n lag 1 ~ N-_~. /III 1 YY r r 61 ~ f y September 24 2008 55 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillilillillilI 111 11 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.176 DESIGN GUIDELINES A. ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT The Rancho Pueblo PDO architecture, reflecting its Spanish-American heritage, is characterized by understated elegance and simplicity incorporating the careful use of details to enhance its attractiveness and function. The challenge confronting designers is to develop an architectural design that captures the charm and quality of that heritage, while meeting the needs of enclosing a variety of uses. Design buildings as part of an overall site architectural esthetic, established throughout the PDO, wherein the central Church and Schools site he west and the Professional Centers to the east and west, are complimentary in design. The buildings will be primarily one-story and two-story structures to complement the residential scale of the surrounding areas. The Worship Center will be the primary feature of the site as well as for the surrounding area, becoming a feature symbol for the entire site and the neighborhood. Its derivative, Spanish-American heritage design will provide identity, a sense of character and also provide a positive visual enhancement to the image of the City of Temecula. It is a large-footprint building that employs architectural elements derived from a Spanish-American aesthetic, in conjunction with stepped sides, to minimize its volumetric impact. The City, as part of their review of development proposals, will consider these Rancho Pueblo PDO guidelines as examples in determining the acceptability of architectural plans and site plan review applications. The City will encourage innovation and imagination in architectural and site design while retaining a clear and defined connection to the fundamental elements of the overall Rancho Pueblo architectural style. All building structures within the PDO area will have, to varying degree, some or much of the architectural treatments and features illustrated on the pages that follow. In particular, the basic building design elements are illustrated in Figure 22 and 22a-c; the use of such architectural elements will be consistent with the architectural style of the building. Architectural designs will incorporate an appropriate variety of qualities including compatibility with adjoining buildings, intimacy of space, layering of views, accent landscaping, richness of materials, play of lights, and appropriateness of rooflines. Where feasible, entries will be oriented toward plazas, courtyards and not directly off parking lots. 1. Form and Scale To blend more closely with the adjacent residential neighborhood, design building masses with sufficient articulation to break up larger building volumes to promote a smaller, more human scale. Facades will be broken up with offsets, fenestration and other articulations to avoid long unbroken walls. No massive, box-type structures with unbroken facades and long continuous forms are permitted, excepting parking structures, which, by their nature are rigid in their design footprints and mass. In the case of parking structures significant efforts will be made to mitigate its form and size (see Section A.5 and Figures 22d-g). °''eteFPb Seotember24.2008 AMENDED 56 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Parapet W/Precat Parapet W/ptanPon. Ylisaion S Tile Rof Conc. Comic, 2 Stc . Stu.,,. Comic, step.o (not foam) S P Stucco Fascu Stucco Fascia Column W/plant-on, Splitfaee Veneer Aluminum Se,memal Arche, Step, Stucco Cap Wnr,.mng Storefront 'fyp, 3 Splitfacc Veneer Buc Typ. Throughout W/Greylim W a primer, Entn,s & Plant-On 2 Step. 1. Skip Trum cl Smem Tluou home Stucco Bases Elsen,.,e g M1lissinn S Tile Terra Cott. B coo Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Fi;ure 22 Reptemb9,24, 2902 September 24. 2008 57 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Vertical srchiirdural h7asaing ai Entrio Wemity Recessed w Skip Trowel Smcco or Prone[ Conc. Se,menn FMI"wi Seg'n1e..1.I Arch 1. Ship Trowel Slew Thmuyuunt Niwo,, S Tile Tcna Caue Blrnd Planned Development Overlay PAOI-0522 Exterior Architectural Aesthetic Figure 22 a Qep ' " ^ September 24 2008 58 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) PREGA5T GONGRETE FLOOR BREAK 1 1 -VARIATION OF WINDOW SIZE EDE5ICrN Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22b Seotember24.2008 59 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) r t, srw~sH Wood aoaas- , niz• aeueF, . b WILE Planned Development Overlay PAOI-0522 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22c ~ , ~,r Seotember24 2008 60 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) - Portions of Top Level sct back 20' from lower levels on Hwy 79 Frontage -f - y`~ J.. stair&Tower Elevation Beyond A t' I, t` r -7 7 tea? r F 1,. } x tilt 1~ t } h ,11 ~d I Typ. Planter r ' I, I r~ ~ I i I Finish Grade Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22d , 2002 September 24 2008 61 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) i I I onen waanrevarwo~xrarn ~rl Y LV/rl ~+~urIIIM W~UIRIM Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Parking Structure Perspective View Key Figure 22e 20612 Seotember24 2008 62 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) a ~ - U W a yay Z G x z SN LL m CV m: W -j n H LU p U 2 Z O _ } a w Y m O W z to O J Ljj W W °C IL z F N U) S Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Parking Structure Perspective Figure 22f Septemo `er 9 4, 2902 Seotember24 2008 63 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) L, I i - ' tl O: W m r c j I ~ N WmLL 1 CZ1 = Q N _r 'I m N F- 1 Planned Development Overlay PAOI-0522 Parking Structure Perspective Figure 22g s"r`""~~e Seofember24 2008 64 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) While all buildings in the Church and Schools project area are limited to two stories, it is recognized that religious worship spaces, similar to concert performance halls, tend to be loftier structures with enhanced interior volume. Nevertheless, the Family Life Center, serving as the initial worship space, and the proposed future, new Worship Center, will not exceed 45 feet, which is well below the current Professional Office zoning height limit at this site of 75 feet. To the degree that is practically possible, and especially within the Church and School's site, buildings will be designed with a general scale and texture that compliments existing development both within the City in general, and, more specifically, within the surrounding residential areas. To further mitigate potential impacts of the larger footprint buildings, the other, mostly one- and two-story site buildings will be aesthetically designed to coordinate with the design of the Worship Center, with a hierarchy of building scales, stepping down from the Worship Center to the perimeter of the site. 2. Complexity and Unity Within the context of an overall PDO area architectural theme, varying building forms and rooflines are encouraged, with facades variegated with returns, fenestration and other building elements, such as towers and building entries. Include, similar architectural elements, as outlined below, to unify further the building design across the PDO area. Tower structures and specific entry designs will be used to accent important features of the site. 3. Architectural Elements a) Building Entries Entries to buildings and lower floors will be of a scale that matches and encourages pedestrian movement and use. Differentiate primary and secondary entrances clearly as indicated in Figures 23, 24, 25 and 25a. Along lower portions of building facades, use of arcades designed integral to pedestrian pathways is encouraged (see also, landscape design illustrations in Section 17.22.172). b) Building elements (Parapets, cornices, stairs) Parapets and cornices will be designed in accordance with Figure 22 and 22a-c. Staircases will be integrated into the overall pedestrian traffic pattern and will be consistent in their mass and design with the buildings style. c,."'""'`' " Seotember24 2008 65 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) LOGO. WINDOW FEATLRE OR TENANT 514NA4E PAT 1 I lt41 4 : LOGO. NINDOW PEATLRE OR TENANT 514NACh' Ip a~~ LOGO, WINDOW FEATURE / OR TENANT SI4NA4E E' I Y~ Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Typical Entrance Detail Figure 23 ~"'r'""'`~~~-=4;-~~ Seotember24 2008 66 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) ICI jai 117 I 7:T `I Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Secondary Entry/Exit Cover A Figure 24 • I 'r',r .n ,ter) ' r., 111 I ~l 1 a h ~ q (h 14 .1111 W Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Secondary Entry/Exit Cover B Figure 24a Qepte 2002 Seotember24 2008 67 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Min. 7x3 Rough Sawn Members Sy. Cm Ends Dnuble Supporting Beams 24' Overhmtg & Speciai Cut At Ends 1 ~ i N Splirtace Veneer Wainscoting Aluminum Typ. Throughout Suner"m Vrccasl Concrete W/Greylim 13 Modular Culumn Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Exterior Secondary Entry/Exit Covers Figure 25 Sgpt «.2 Sectember 24 2008 68 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Min. 4x4 Rough Uouhlc Suplwtrzing Remna Sawn b[emhers 24 Overhang & SPC W Sy Cut Btd Cut Al Enda 1 I_ fJ 11 7 - Ir " - • -FS3' AIMmUtn tiplitfave Veneer Siorcrmm Jll - Wainxonng W/Geylite 14 Typ TNwghqut Enhanced Paving _ Prtcaat CUncrcre Mudulm Column Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Exterior Secondary Entry/Exit Covers Fi-ure 25 a °nr''""'`"'`'"•,.~~~ Seotember 24 2008 69 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) c) Roofs Varying rooflines and complete full roof structures are encouraged, although, where views do not extend onto roof surfaces, a mansard-type treatment may be used. Rooflines and roof materials will be appropriate to the architectural style, including the use wherever feasible of two-piece terra cotta tile, as indicated in Figure 22 and 22a-c. d) Arcades, Colonnades, Balconies Arcades are encouraged, in particular, due to their pedestrian function and association with the proposed predominant architectural style of the PDO. Figure 26, shows characteristic colonnade details. Balconies will be designed so that they are functional and located so that they do not infringe on the privacy of neighboring properties. e) Window, Doors, Wall Openings Window shape and detailing will be consistent with traditional Spanish-American heritage design. They will be proportionate to the wall mass, in which they are situated, and include appropriate material treatment that is consistent with the building style. Figure 27 illustrates window and entry covers, including sloped and flat exterior shade coverings; the latter are more characteristic of garden and plaza areas, and are well-scaled for secondary entrances (see also Figure 27a). Design doors to complement the architectural style, using wood, molding, hinges, doorknobs, and doorknockers appropriate to the Spanish-American heritage (see Figure 22c). 4. Materials and Finishes Appropriate materials to the architecture can include wrought iron, stucco or board-on- board. Material sample boards will be attached to individual site-specific plan applications. 5. Parking Structures Design parking structures to allow incorporation of building facades, tower elements, and other features that will promote a tie-in with the overall Spanish-American design theme; upper level decks to setback 20 feet along the Highway 79 frontage (see Figure 22d). Exterior building finishes, false window and wall treatments will also reflect the architectural design treatments on adjacent structures. Place structures to, minimize their intrusion in public views, especially from the Los Ranchitos residential areas north of the PDO Area. Graduated landscape screening materials will be used to soften the structure's overall appearance, with taller trees and planted materials serving to break up building lines. Consider trailing vines, climbing vines, and other exterior wall surface plantings, where practicable. Repte be ' , 2902 Seotember24 2008 70 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) i hlissinn S Tilc Roof W/Planl On nep. Stucco Fascia i Column W'/Plam-0n. imp, Stucco Cap Splnfauc Veneer Aluminum Segmemal Arches Plan, On 2 Step, Wainuwing Swrcfronl Tvp. Stucco Bases Tc p. Thruughom \gGrcl lire IA 1 Skip Tnn,cl SIIICLu Thruu¢huut Shsaun S Tile Terra Cuua Blend Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Exterior Colonnade Fi-ure 26 ' , Seotember24 2008 71 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Donhle Supposing 9oum Min. 4c4 Rough ?l" Octrhytg & Speaol Sawn Memberx Cut At Ends Sq. Cut Ends ~ i~t ~ ,i Icy I• --SpfilF ce l~cnt.•rJ \lunuiwn W'aimmonng Precaxt Concrerc Sronfimnt \lodulur Column TYP Thraughow R%Grrstuc tl Planned Development Overlay PA01-0522 Exterior Sloped Window Shade Covers Figure 27 c,.r .,,o Seotember 24 2008 72 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO.6) 5/6" TYPE _--7/8" STUGGO X' 6W5 J k HDR PER FRAMING 4 X WOOD PI--AN TRIM 5AGKER ROD GLAZING PER AND SEALANT 56HEDULE - SHIM AS REQUIRED WINDOW FRAME NAIL-ON WINDOW SET IN CONT. WITH STOREFRONT BEAD 5ILIC PROFILE SEALANT - G I. FLA5HING l4 X WOOD 5ULLN05E MASONRY TRIM _ SILL GOP[NG SET IN EPOXY GROUT WOOD CANT 5AGKER ROD DOUBLE PLATE AND SEALANT 7/8" 5T0000 Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Window Detail Figure 27a. Qe,gtL^4bgi-.,-2002Seotember24 2008 73 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 6. Drive-Thru Drive-thru establishments, as permitted in the Land Use Matrix for the PDO, will be designed in accordance with city standards. B. ACCENT ELEMENTS 1. Paving, Plazas and Walkways Plazas and connecting pedestrian walkways shall be designed as part of an overall PDO area network. Structural landscape elements such as seating, low walls, arbors and trellises will be incorporated throughout, at appropriate locations, to encourage rest and contemplation, as illustrated in Figure 11. 2. Site Furniture Design and place outdoor furniture, integrated with, and complimentary to, the architectural style, throughout the site, to encourage informal seating and gathering; be especially cognizant of the need for informal lunchtime eating areas. Coordinate placement with provision of landscaped and architecturally shaded areas. Examples of appropriate seating are illustrated in Figure 28. 3. Fountains Fountains of various sizes, and designed complimentary to the architectural style, are encouraged at various locations throughout the PDO area. Fountains will be used to highlight entries, help mask exterior site noise intrusion close to Highway 79, and to break-up larger paved and plaza areas. An example of an appropriate fountain is illustrated in Figure 29. 4. Raised Planters Use raised and curbed planters to protect plantings from foot traffic, where appropriate and where site grades lend themselves to such elements. In some cases elaborate and expand planters into seating areas as appropriate, and as illustrated in Figure 28. Qepten;ber 2902 Seotember24 2008 74 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) -51 T., I, SECTION ELEV. 8ULLNOSE 12' JUMBO BRICK I" THICK CLAY PAVERS 4" PATIO W/6x6 TOGA WIRE MESH 1 112" DIA. 5CHED. 40 PVC DRAIN 6' O.C 2" SAND S X B X 16 BLOCK a p.. W/04 VFRT ® 32" 0.6 W/OPEN HEAD JT5 006 VI5OLeEN FOR DRAINAGE FOOTING 2'-8"X 12- °4 CONTINOU5 SAGO PALM- r/ BENCH K=4 7 „ LEVEL 1 PLA14TER T FLORAL II COLOR l LEVEL 2 PLANTER BRILIANT FLORAL ~ I COLOR ACCENT TO LEVEL 1 _ Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Typical Planter/Integrated Seat Figure 28 c""`" September 24 2008 75 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) n2 Rf ~ O O O P4 a ~ z C4 O IV M M a w R M 00 Ra i Z ~a 60 E O ~T''"''^, Seotember24 2008 76 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) z_ a 3 o~ z w W ry O Q 3 U C W a I ~ I w i El ;E71 o 1 i ~ 1 Fes, }i 'IiLI, I,~ 2 ~ F 1 W j ~M 0. i E;i! u Q ' ••=L Seotember24 2008 77 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) C. WALLS AND FENCES Integrate fences and walls into the overall PDO area thematic design, so that they provide a sense of definition and are consistent with the architectural style. 1. Masonry Stucco Use stucco-covered masonry walls atop the berm running within the Highway 79 buffer as detailed in Figure 30. 2. Three-Rail Along the rear and west property lines, use white, three-rail fencing with incorporated chain-link, as indicated and detailed in Figure 31. 3. Chain-Link Free-standing chain-link fencing is not permitted, except along the Water District and Southern California Edison easements on the west property line, if existing or as required by the respective agencies for safety purposes. All such fencing will have screening landscaping planted immediately adjacent along its entire length, except at necessary gate locations. D. LIGHTING Rancho Pueblo contains a wide range of land uses, necessitating use of varied lighting types across the PDO area. These include streetlights, parking lot standards, walkway and low- level security lighting, wall wash and accent fixtures, and other specialty lighting. While recognizing the differing lighting requirements for the various uses, a common design theme, in keeping with the overall Spanish-American derivative style of the PDO, will provide for as much uniformity of lighting design as possible. Keep adverse impacts of lighting to a minimum, with especial care to the prevention of light spillage over adjacent properties and screening of visible bright light sources from view from adjacent residential areas and from Highway 79. Additionally, use selective sub-area switching to keep night lighting to the minimum required for any given set of uses. Specify lighting placements as part of Site Development Plan submittals. Where appropriate, manufacturer's samples, cut-sheets, or brochures will be included to illustrate equivalent style and forms. Provide photometrics for any lighting planned for light-sensitive areas, e.g., sports fields near residential use and highway-adjacent lighting next to State roadways. Typical lighting information and fixtures are shown in Figure 32a through 32d. Septe""bqri2 , 2902 Seotember 24 2008 78 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Yv N vO * 0Z j O O CL (L Ui oc > >a 3Y W j IL Q em J OZ wZ wa LU Is WJ Z0 ZJ 6U Sm GQ.U CN F Q O W U A~ A ~ m ~ .I 1 ~O S092 September 24 2008 79 Rancho Pueblo. Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) nt M O Y Z zw O a2 Q Uu a+ a Q w Q q W U L a GL w z TV s z~ C) a Z °a w LL z I~ Y U~Q IJ~II1 z W O l wZw a ~ IL=J ~UW ° ~UZ N (V o w<O o x Ui U LLJ ';Agm` Seotember24 2008 80 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Design Features 4Z" Housing: The heavy duty spun aluminum shroud is welded to the 8" diameter extruded aluminum thorax and sealed to prevent water entry The top Cap seals ballast Compartment and a removable for accessing ballast by three X31 stainless steel fasteners. Dome Cap: The rugged hydroformed aluminum Cap with a hemispherical shape rests on the cast 4. aluminum ring welded to the ex« uded :horax. I _ I Cap is gasketed to prevent water or insect entry I T Door Assembly: Spun alum,nurn frame secures dear tempered glass lens Frame is gasketea and secured to housing with tamper resistant stainless steel fasteners. I Optical Assembly: Hyoroformed reflector is secured in housing and provides and iES type III distribution. I Mounting Bracket: Extruded aluminum arm assembly 251 I `,~%h decorative support is welded to'umma!re dome Cap 4ssen-b,y ~s secured to pole with stanicsss steel 12 fasteners Ballast/Lamp Assembly: Ballast are high power itC-_or and sultab!e for -20'F cceraoon The ballast is mounted I l t^e tnofax and is se.Ufed `.17G n,e'o I[~ screws Lamp _OCke: shall be porcelain medium base pulse-rated and I I 42 mounted Co r efleQCr Finish: Folyesier powder coarng on all metal parts. Coler to be ;oec!fiec Listing: Luminaire is ETL listed for 'wet locations i IS i; 4' Specification Guide • SGw/HPS=OSS L277 IF=Single Fuse wi HFS = COS ZF=pcubleFUSe 7S VN11 ixwiHFS i SCVv/l = I;S N= BUCOn Ce!I W'H = Vhge /OW = o;N WM= Wail Mount cL= Siver OGwiMF! =ION 2A= Tw!n Nm C = Ccv;r C Oustcm I ISw/M.H = i if, iA=Triple Nm Example: 00 Wa Meal HaIde, 120 Volts. ~!ngie VK I I I OH-1 20/1 F/BZ Figure 32a Planned Development Overlav PAO1-0522 Parking Lot & Driveway Lighting CnYrn... F,~~~ September 24 2008 81 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 902 LAMPS/BALLASTS BOLLARD Incandescent: 1 - 10OW max (A-19). Fluorescent: 1 compact 26W (F26TTT), or 1 compact 42W (F42TM. H.I.D.: 1- 50W or 70W metal halide, or 1- 50W or 70W high pressure sodium. (ED17, medium base). Specify voltage. Incandescent available 120V only. For H.I.D., ballasts are High Power Factor (HPF) thermally protected and outdoor-rated. For fluorescent, Electronic Ballasts (SSB) are standard. 4-pin lamps required. See "Ballasts" and "Lamps" in Section G. Lamps by others. See "User Guide" for information on starting temperatures of fluorescent fixtures. MATERIALS / FIXTURE LOCATION U.L. listed for wet location. Hood, support arms and post are solid copper. Fixture body and mounting base are Sand Cast Bronze. FINISHES Diffuser: Clear Glass, inside sanded. 91tam Base & Body: Sand Cast Bronze (weathers to a dark patina). (23 cml Hood, Arms, Post: j NCP - Natural Copper (weathers to a dark patina). ;N. VG - Verdi-Gris a CC - Custom Color, Semi-Gloss MOUNTING Overall bollard height is 36" standard. Specify other, (ex: 28"OA). Post is wireway; wire is made up below removable head. Conduit enters at center of base plate. Anchor bolts and template are 3Y2"O supplied with fixture. l9 cml Cast base is standard mounting, supplied with anchor bolts and template. 12"42 I Figure 32b Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Walkway, Plaza & Panting Deck Lighting c""""""`' ' Seotember24 2008 82 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) / / Series lumilite Design Features Housing: The heavy duty spun aluminum shroud is welded to a cast aluminum ring Three 'A" blue acrylic disks with luminous edges are machined to securely fit between each ring. Three rods bolt the cast rings and accent disks to the shroud with y; satin spacers and are capped with decorative 1 stainless steel acorn nuts Dome Cap: The rugged hydroformed aluminum cap with a hemispherical shape is secured to the F~? cast aluminum ring with 3 stainless steel fasteners. Dome is gasketed to prevent water or insect entry y, Enclosure: An 8" diameter seamless white "DR" acrylic enclosure is gasketed and secured to a cast i I J ring welded in shroud w¢h two thumb screws. Mounting Bracket: A 2" diameter extruded aluminum arm with 12"radius bend is welded to cast back plate. Arm slips over the tenon on cap and is secured with 3 stainless steel fasteners. A heavy duty steel zinc plated bracket mounts to the 1-Box and wall surface and is attacned to the inside of cast plate with two stainless steel fastener,. Dirce[ mount to pole is optional "PM' Ballast/Lamp Assembly: All ballast shall be high power fatter and suitable for -20° F operation The ballast is mounted in the thorax and is 14 „t. secured with two screws. Lamp sockets shall be _ porcelain housing base pul_e-rated anG mounted - g Finish: Polyester powder ccahng on all metal parts. Color to be specified. Listing: Lummaire Is ETL listed far we[ locations L 20" Specification Guide 50w/HPS-055 120 IF-single Fuse BZ-Bronze 70w/HPS-075 208 2F-Double Fuse 8K-B,,.-„ IOOwiHPS-105 240 PH - Button Cell 'NH-,1vre VK-7 70w/MH-071H 277 PM-Pole Mount I OOw/MH-IOH 480 SL-Silver CC-Custom coo, Example: 100 Watt. Metal Halide. 120 Volts. S,nolP Fncr Rrnn7P VK-710H-120/1F/BZ Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Wall Mounted Lighting Figure 32c S b-I:24-2992 Seatember 24 2008 83 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDo-6) light-Styint m 2" 5 Easy Pie CeSTM Enhanced product, unprecedented 10-year warranty The Light-Structure 2 system is designed LightSrrucmre 2 builds on the success of NIU, u's Light-Structure and manufactured from foundation-to-poletop System"making the industry leading sports-lightin stem even to make your sports-lighting projects better, Anil now with 10 Club Service - our comprehensive simple, safe, and cost-effective product assurance warranty- MUSC0 provides all pat is and labor to maintain it for the next ten years. Building on proven product perlormance In 1991, Musco introduced the Light-Structure System, the first a» complete spurts-lighting system designed and manufactured from foundation-to-poletop in i Easy Pieces. Engineered to be easy to bur, install and operate, the system provided major advantages in ` environmental light control, energy efficiency, durability, safety and cost-effectiveness. Poletop yy; F.ven [he best engineered laboratory test is ttnt it substi Wte fur the Laminaire , real world, so Slusco's Product Performance "ream travels the US. Assembly and Canada, inspecting our sports-lighting systems on-site to ensure thev are performing for our customers. To date, we've inspected close to 30Qb of all existing Light-Structure Systems. We're so confident in Light-Structure 2's reliability, we'll maintain It for the next to years On-site inspections motion the outtanJing performance of our lighting system in the !field, and helps us identify product Wire enhancements to make Light-Structure 2 even more durable. Harness In talking with our customers, we ve also learned that budget cuts and overbooked schaduies make arranging for routine maintenance a challenge. "It- meet our customers' needs, we've ` developed 10 Club Service , a comprehensive warranty and maintenance program - providing it!] parts and labor, including a group lamp replacement - to maintain operation of .Your Light-Structure 2 system for the next 10 years,guurunteed. Electrical Co onents A program so sound, it's insured E~OSO~ More than just a promise, Alusca's 10 Club Service is underwritten by a top-rated insurance company. Aber an independent review of our outstanding product performance and service record, the _ Steadfast Insurance Company further insures :xiasm will provide comprehensive 10 Club Service for the full 10 sears. You won't and this added assurance anyplace else in the spurts-lighting marketplace Galvanized Imagine, worry free lighting season after season - for you, your Steel Pole facility, your community -for the next 10 years. blusco> product and service assurance We Yfake It Happen Precast Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 G Basete Sports Field Lighting Figure 32d ' September 24 2008 84 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6) 1. Streets and Parking Areas Street and parking lot lighting will be the minimum feasible height, and in no case greater that twenty feet high. Provide fixtures with cut-off hoods to direct light only horizontally and downward, using fixtures as shown in Figure 32a. For parking structures, limit exterior wall-wash lighting, while providing outside lighting primarily for vehicular and pedestrian entrances (no wall packs), and low-level interior security lighting. Also, limit the height of lights on top level by using bollard-style fixtures, as shown in Figure 32b, and require glare shielding to confine light to top level and avoid light spillage off- site. 2. Pedestrian and Wall-Mounted A combination of bollard-style lighting (as shown in Figure 32b) and wall-mounted fixtures (as shown in Figure 32c) will be used throughout the site, for pedestrian areas. Higher, standard-type lighting may be used in lieu, in certain cases where low-level night, security and wall-wash lighting is not feasible. 3. Accent Use accent lighting and specialized techniques to enhance the after-dark image of the PDO area, particularly entry monuments, signage and signature structures, such as the proposed Worship Center. All fixtures, except fixtures directed downwards unless under a canopy, will be low-pressure sodium type meeting the requirements of the Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance. 4. Sports Fields Recreational after-dark lighting is required for the playing fields to meet the needs of sports teams, casual play, and outdoor ministry activities, while recognizing standards set by the City of Temecula. Consider location, size, type, number of fixtures, and orientation to keep spillage and impacts to neighboring residential areas to a minimum. Pole-mounted fixtures, as shown in Figure 32d will be used. Data on photometrics, shielding and compliance with the Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance will be required for all proposed developments. Field users will be time-restricted in cooperation and in coordination with the Church and its neighbors, and possibly with the City of Temecula. E. SIGNAGE Provide signage throughout the PDO area as part of a well-coordinated, area-wide scheme, designed to match and blend with landscaping and building architecture (Figure 33, 34, 34a-b, 36). Integrate directional and identification signage for both vehicular and pedestrian purposes by incorporating unifying elements such as type, color, lettering, style and logo. Each tenant will submit a sign plan in accordance with these provisions, under individual site-specific plan submissions. . Septet'' ' , 9992 September 24. 2008 85 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) N ~ 4 4 _ ,~1 V t~iY ~ 4 F-D _ C ~ a a No 1.3 k I Q m M d \ ~ Ss ~ 11 ~T Q+a 'D z i ,-2902 September 24 2008 i ' °;fd ~9~ ~r 86 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) (NOT MI TF-RWI 777 Rk e F-M FACe S RO CENTER iNOr sla~E S OF cess MWh>t TEAL-FLAT a_7 ° TENANT SIGNAfiE y _ _:_L T t 1 r- - -MOFf,-kA CANT F "`r0 MATLN Pi-R:r 5 MLOW 6R<E Signs A B C y'T 4 12• GONG MOLDING We AST GGR}LR5 (NOT MITeRm 5 5 T F` 7' GONG MOLDING W/GA5. GOR44EA5 GRAPMIGS - V - - (NOT MITERED) REG 5sen li Inc)? _14• TYPE t,s RLyE` ' ! ~t Ti) 1'tl t 7~ l•: T ~.1 n• .YYPE REGCiSPD L MORTAR F"'; EA4 PAGE '-INOT,%CE5 OF 9 EGE551 M°O4M TeA' .PLAT T _sa.IT-F GMu 1 - --_1 T I TO MA.Ik EL,, 5 NL'S ROOD Sign llaE eP1 A GRACE CM 1,RWVt K¢artK (I>'t Rff W.LIC T45f 31 M4<[Af,OR LGTlftR'H]L4M1GY1 IU,i PINt/K1Oftt!Qlr N.1Wf 10 A'YCOMNOt11.KM UCr96C50I'tt[t R+tIIAlIKKOLU),IGMSWAt4 H rVtiLy, o•eA ro umrnvtrc roe } oIt .HALCON ROJO VIATP~ °Id PROFESSIONALC211M ~ 1:5 W LP5 FLOCO ° I Pi1OW GRAV- I SiVG Two S:.^.Ell -----s°--- PF.R°ENroh_; AR To STRFF- Planned Developme at Overlay PAO1-0522 Signage Figures 34 CeY/em~er 2A, seorember24 2008 AMENDED 87 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) RECAST CONCRETE CASTIN -PLACE PARAPET CAP CONCRETE PLAYGROUND 4 _ OESIACE MOSAIC AMIL 09NC Planter / V2'CLEAR KRYLICDA"EDWO COATCLEA;f COAT PAINT TO AhTCH STORSFRCNT COLOR 151TRULE 20" RULE - R 2D'-- I• -ROUTE VC RA0. 6 POLISH 11 13 (NO FLAME POU5H) 3 311 D ~..5w ' y.. tl -4 H 11 _ All1 1 D' ALTERNATE SIGN COHSiRVC1U0N: - "ITE CUT VINYL LETTERS& RULES(APPVEO iO DACR) /Y ERPANDUP IC NY 6 ROUTED TO MATCH DIMENSIONS. FONT 15 'COPPERPLATE GOTHIC 30DC SPRAYPAWSEMIGLOSS TO MATCH5TOREFRONT Sa 15130ITS(USE UPPERS AND LOWERS AISO PT5) MRY'NHRE CUT VINYL LETTERING TO 5URFACE (AS SHCN U REMOVE ALL NR BUSOLES RIOR TO PAINTING Adhered Plaque- NO FONT 505nnmONORALTERAnON Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Signage Figure 34a °"r' Seotember24 2008 88 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Planned Development Overlay PAO 1-0522 Under Canopy Signage Figure 34b c""'" Seotember 24 2008 89 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 12' O' LONG. MOLOWC. (NOT MITERS ) 5 . 12 0' s S%4 ELELTRONIC 1 REALER BOARD (TWO SICESI CMRLH LOGO (OPPOSITE TWO 5IMS) COPPER ANODIZED ALL. PRAMS STUCCO TO MATCH BLCV.5 RELE55ED 1' - j RANCFC CCINMUNm PAINT RFC PAC 1• 3* P~E ~ r Cr.UZ-F & SCCOLS (NOT 5IC7ES OF RECE5 i MORTAR CANT SPLIT PAGE CML _ TO MATCH ELO& 5 SOOW LP5 FLOOD Sign F BELOW &.-Am LAN Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Church Signage Tower With Electronic Signage Figure 35 ptLfn er2l, 2902 Seotember24 2008 90 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 1. Monument Site identification signs will comply with the requirements set forth herein and to the City Design Standards, and will be mounted on monument walls no greater than four (4) feet in height on either one or both sides of entrance roadways (see Figures 33 and 34). All freestanding signs must be the monument-type no taller than eight (8) feet with no more than six (6) equal sized tenant spaces with architectural elements at the top, base and sides, similar to Figure 34. Freestanding pole signs are not permitted. Place entry monument features, with integral signage identifying the site, at all appropriate vehicle and pedestrian entries. Employ a hierarchy of entry signage designs (Figure 34) to differentiate, clearly, the major entries, at Chapel Lane and Rancho Pueblo Road, from the secondary entries. The secondary entry at the east boundary of the PDO will receive proportionately less expansive design elements. Incorporate landscape and architectural features, blended with overall site landscape and architectural themes, into the design of the entry monuments. Light entry monuments externally, with low-level, low-pressure sodium, wall-wash lighting in accordance with the Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance. Another variation on the overall PDO signage program relates to the Rancho Pueblo Sports Center. The signage, shown in Figure 34 Sign E, is designed to complement the park environment it features stacked ledgestone and stucco sign faces. 2. Building and Tenant Identification Owner and tenant identification signage, throughout the PDO area, will adhere to a common design theme and requirements, as delineated herein. Signage design will integrate with the architectural style of the buildings, through use of such elements as finishes, fasciae and moldings (Figures 34, 34a, and 36). Tenants using an entire building will be allowed one freestanding monument sign similar to the designs shown in Figure 34 but not to exceed a height of four (4) feet nor a copy area greater than 30 square feet. Canopy signs will not be permitted due to the "pueblo" design theme. Under-canopy signs are permitted. All under-canopy signs for individual tenants will follow the shape in Figure 34b; this shape is also used for delivery signs. Address numbers must meet the Fire Department requirement of 6". All address numbers are to be located at the same height above curb as directed by the fire marshal. Restaurant menu signs are permitted only where needed at a drive-through restaurant. Changeable plaques, On Figure 34 Signs A, B & C, where used as a part of a sign, must be bronze and bolted in place with spacers to maintain a plumb line; sign shape will be the same as Figure 34a Plaques. c""`"" e ' , 2902 September 24 2008 91 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Un-int eO ia^ wallSuda udaee 2,8• M*, S Vl 1.MID j &j KLEI l 1.5 Sign Height Furniture Importers-' 14' 0' _-----16'4 1/2'• Planned Development Overlay PAO1-0522 Commercial Wall Mounted Signage Figure 36 ' , September 24 2008 92 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 3. Pedestrian-Oriented Pay particular attention to provision of pedestrian-orientated, directional signage that acknowledges and encourages pedestrian movement and use throughout the PDO area. Pedestrian-oriented signage will be used within clusters of buildings and, when appropriate, is also encouraged within parking areas, directing pedestrians to the various site entities (see Figure 34a). Pedestrian directional signs will be integrated into raised planters (see Figure 28 Planters). Post and blade pedestrian signs are not allowed, except when required to meet ADA and Fire Lane signs requirements. 4. Vehicular Directional Signage Vehicular directional signs will follow the same shape and design as the freestanding monument signs - same texture and colors, maximum height 3'-0" (see Figure 34a). 5. Specialty Due to the changing and evolving nature of its school programs, the Rancho Community Church and Schools project may employ an electronic signage feature at the intersection of Highway 79 South and Chapel Lane (Figure 35). The overall design of such sign will be integrated with the architectural style of the buildings, through use of such elements as finishes, fasciae, moldings and lighting. Specific illumination will be determined and addressed as part of the requisite sign permit; flashing or animated text is not permitted and any associated, fixed signage text will be integrally incorporated into the structure of this entry monument. Up to two reader boards on a single sign element are permitted, one each on adjacent or opposing faces, to facilitate bi-directional observation. 6. Sign Illumination Internal illumination of signs is prohibited. Conventional channel lettering and coated Styrofoam letters are not allowed. External lighting of signs must comply with the lighting requirements in Section 17.22.176.D and with the requirements of the Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance. 7. Commercial Wall Mounted Tenant Signs The following requirements for commercial wall mounted signage are intended to create harmonious, controlled appearance to the Rancho Pueblo Development. These requirements are intended to allow commercial entities to use existing, recognizable identity systems and to provide a common visual format for commercial entities without existing, recognizable identity systems. The requirements are also intended to compliment the development's esthetic features while minimizing competition through visual gimmickry and garish color selection. Sept 2092 Seotember24 2008 93 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PDO-6) a) Guidelines for units with less than 20,000 square feet (without a regionally recognized identity system): I. All sign locations to be wall mounted, centered over unit's storefront and/or entry system below any fascia. Background wall surface must be 1.5 times the sign height. 2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with no more than 6 wall-mounted, hooded fixtures, directed against the wall, using white lamps (no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's design and details. 3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with matte finish, no substitutions. No plastic letters/graphics. 4. Each sign to have a primary and secondary line. Primary line is tenant's name. Secondary line is description of services. 5. Primary line is 14" Times New Roman all uppercase, as shown in Figure 36, maintain matched typefaces and surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 6. Secondary line is 7" Times New Roman upper and lowercase, as shown in Figure 36, maintain matched typefaces and surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 7. Rule is 1" tall 3/4" thick cast aluminum, as shown in Figure 36, maintain matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 8. 28" square logo, block, as shown in Figure 36, is optional for tenants who wish to display a graphics mark. The logo is to be cut (subtracted) from the square. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic, paint...) Material is 3/4" aluminum cut and finished , maintain matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 9. All letters and graphic to be mounted with a standoff of 3/4" to l" from wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign manufacturer's specifications. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and graphic FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance may vary from 3/4" to 1". Seotember 24 2008 2992 r 94 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) b) Guidelines for units with less than 20,000 square feet (with a regionally recognized identity system): 1. All sign locations to be wall-mounted, centered over unit's storefront and/or entry system below any fascia. 2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with no more than 5 wall-mounted, hooded fixtures, directed below the horizontal plane, using white lamps (no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's design and details. 3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with matte finish, no substitutions. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic, paint). Material to be cut and finished, maintain matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 4. Sign area must not exceed 38.8 square feet (calculate area using 8 sided polygon). 5. Sign width must not exceed 16'-7 1/2". Sign height must not exceed 6'. 6. All letters and graphics to be mounted with a standoff of 3/4" to 1" from wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign manufacturer's specification. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and graphic FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance may vary from 3/4" to I". c) Guidelines for commercial wall mounted tenant/anchor signage for units with more than 20,000 square feet: 1. All sign locations to be wall mounted below any fascia. 2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with wall mounted, hooded fixtures, directed below the horizontal plane, using white lamps (no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's design and details. 3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with matte finish, no substitutions. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic, paint...) maintain matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted. 4. Sign area must not exceed 60 square feet (calculate area using 8 sided polygon). 5. Sign width must not exceed 18'0". Sign height must not exceed 6'. c""'"" be, :2 Seotember 24 2008 r 95 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development overlay (PD0-6) 6. All letters and graphics to be mounted with a stand off of 3/4" to 1" from wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign manufacturer's specifications. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and graphic FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance may vary from 3/4" to 1". Septeq;ber2g, 2992 Seotember24 2008 96 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) 17.22.178 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES Procedures set forth below, are guides to the implementation of the Rancho Pueblo Planned Development. A. ADOPTION OF THE PDO The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay, once reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission and adopted by ordinance by the City Council, will satisfy the General Plan requirement for the ZI overlay. The present zoning designation on the approximately 53 acres of the PDO area, Professional Office, remains unchanged, and development of the area is governed by the requirements set forth in the City of Temecula zoning code for Professional Office, except as modified herein. B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS A separate Site Development Plan Review Process (whether Conditional Use Permit or Site Plan) will be required for each development site within the Rancho Pueblo PDO Area. Under individual site plan review, precise site plan details including, for example, the number and mix of specific building usage, shall be required. In general, site development plans shall be processed in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code 17.05.010 - Development Plans. However, to the extent that a proposed use is permitted by the Rancho Pueblo Matrix of Uses, the Director of Planning may approve such plans, without limitation to the 10,000 square foot criterion of Code Section 17.05.010(D.2.). Uses requiring a CUP shall be processed through the Planning Commission. C. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Through its adoption by the City of Temecula, the PDO will allow for minor variations from the design and development standards depicted herein without necessitating further PDO submissions or amendments. Any proposed alternatives to the development standards contained herein will be subject to approval by the Director, Department of Community Development. However, the Director may determine that proposed alternative standards are beyond the scope intended under this subsection, and may require further review and approval by the Planning Commission and possibly the City Council. D. AMENDING THE PDO To the extent that project proposals fall outside the standards set forth in the PDO, a PDO Amendment will be required. Processing of such an amendment will require approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Examples of proposed changes that require a PDO Amendment include but are not limited to, development exceeding two stories, land uses not permitted within the Matrix of Permitted Uses (Table 17.22.166A, herein), alternative setbacks and alternative height limits. geptembor24, 2002 Seolember24 2008 97 Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) E. EXPANSION OF THE PDO AREA The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay encompassed approximately 53 acres. Should the property owner(s) of the adjacent 28 acres to the east, which comprises Z2, elect to be added to this PDO, application of these development standards will apply. It is recognized that some additional details, e.g., on-site circulation and community-edge treatments, will have to be incorporated into development standards for a new planning area of this PDO. Expansion of the Rancho Pueblo PDO is subject to Planning Commission and City Council review and approval. g; ' Seatember 24 2008 98 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _Q- Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before . the' City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: Planning Application Nos. PA06-0205, PA07-0309 and PA08-0273 Applicant: Jim Griffin, Covenant Development Proposal: A Development Plan for the construction of three office buildings, Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO-6) Amendment, and a Minor Exception for parking, generally located 425 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road on Temecula Parkway Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and therefore exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162) Case Planner: Eric Jones Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: December 17, 2008 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission is controlled by the statute of limitations provisions set forth in Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. Any action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission is controlled by Chapter 2.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing as provided in Chapter 2.36 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Copies of the procedures for the conduct of City Council, Planning Commission, and Planning Director public hearings are available from the City Clerk. If you wish to challenge the above [project] in court, the challenge will be limited to only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice, and must be commenced within the time limit specified in Section 1094.5 and Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694-6400.