Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08_053 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 08-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TAKE VARIOUS ACTIONS RELATED TO ANNEXATION OF THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA LOCATED TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF THE EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council directed staff to initiate a feasibility study of an Annexation and Sphere of Influence Expansion of approximately 4600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of the San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On March 6, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council adopted Resolution No. 07-23 to initiate proceedings for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. C. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan, Zone Text Amendment and Pre-Zoning) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary (collectively, the "Amendment'). D. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Draft EIR and the various components of the Annexation Project on November 19, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Amendment the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council certify the EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The Planning Commission in recommending approval to the City Council of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Code Amendment, and Pre-Zoning, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Amendment integrates the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan. The proposed Amendment will integrate the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan by amending the City's General Plan Land Use Map to adopt General Plan Land Use Designations for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation consisting of Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS). Currently, 554 acres of the 4,997 acres of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation are located within the City's Sphere of Influence and are already designated on the City's General Plan Land Use Map with 318 acres as Open Space (OS) and 236 acres Hillside Residential (HR). The Amendment will adopt the remaining 4,443 acres into the City's General Plan Land Use Map designating 3,961 acres as Open (OS) and 482 acres as Hillside Residential (HR). In total, the Santa Margarita Area Annexation encompasses 4,997 acres of which 4,284 acres will be designated as Open Space (OS) and 713 acres will be designated as Hillside Residential (HR). The General Plan amendment is contingent upon the ultimate approval by Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO') of the City's proposed Sphere of Influence expansion of 4,443 acres and, if approved, the proposed General Plan amendment will integrate the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan. B. The Amendment implements the direction, goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The proposed Amendment implements the proposed and existing General Plan Land Use Designations for the Annexation area, which ultimately implements the direction, goals and policies outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The Pre-Zoning and zoning amendment adopts Zoning Districts within the Development Code to match, and implement, the proposed General Plan Land Use Designations for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. The Santa Margarita Area Annexation encompasses approximately 4,997 acres of which 4,284 acres would be zoned Conservation-Santa Margarita (OS-C-SM) to implement the Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use Designation, and 713 acres would e zoned Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR-SM) to implement the Hillside Residential (HR) General Plan Land Use Designation. In addition, the zoning amendment includes Hillside Development Standards for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation establishing the framework to implement the direction, goals and policies of the City's General Plan. As outlined in the Land Use Element (Page LU-39), "The City will preserve the quality of hillsides and reduce potential hazards associated with hillside development by incorporating hillside development standards within the Development Code." The proposed Hillside Development Standards for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation are consistent with goals, policies and implementation programs as outlined in the adopted City of Temecula General Plan including, but not limited to, the General Plan Land Use Policies identified within Table 3.4-3 of the EIR and the General Plan Goals, Policies and Implementation Programs as follows: -The Open Space Element (Water Resources Pages OS-23 and OS-24) calls for the protection of the Santa Margarita River from development impacts supported by Goal OS-2, Policies 2.1 and 2.9. -The Open Space Element (Biological Resources Pages OS-25 and OS- 26) emphasizes permanent dedication of open spaces in and around the community aimed to conserve resources of significance and safeguard viable ecological connections between significant natural areas supported by Goal OS- 3, Policies 3.1-3.7 (Policy 3.7 specifically indicates the City's policy to maintain and enhance the resources of the Santa Margarita River to ensure the long term viability of the habitat, wildlife and wildlife movement corridors). -The Open Space Element (Open Space Page OS-26 through Page OS- 28) recognizes that topographical features such as the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, as well as natural drainage courses and states that the environmental resources of the Santa Margarita River should be protected from insensitive development and activities, supported by Goal OS-5, Policies 5.1-5.3, and 5.8. -The Open Space Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including OS-9; OS-10; OS-11; OS-12; OS-13; OS-14, OS-19; OS- 20, OS-21; OS-22; OS-25; OS-33; OS-34; OS-35. -The Land Use Element (Natural Resources and Community Aesthetics Page LU-47) indicates the importance of hillsides, which form an aesthetic backdrop for the community, and is supported by Goal LU-6, Policies 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4. -The Land Use Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including LU-14; LU-18, LU-20; and LU-21. The propose Hillside Development Standards specifically address LU-19 which states, "Promote preservation of hillsides surrounding the community through the following actions: (1) Enforce hillside grading standards to naturalize the effects of grading; (2) Require the preservation of unique natural features; (3) Encourage a broad range of architectural and site planning solutions; and (4) Develop hillside development standards that consider site constraints in determining location, type and intensities of new development along the western escarpment and other surrounding hillside areas." The pre-zoning of the Annexation Area is contingent upon the ultimate approval by LAFCO of the City's Santa Margarita Area Annexation proposal. If approved, the proposed amendment will establish the framework to ensure development within the project area implements the directions, goals and policies related to the protection and preservation of natural and sensitive resources, habitat and the hillsides area as outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Policies referenced herein are hereby incorporated into this Resolution as if set forth in full. C. The proposed Amendment preserves public lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation in natural open space while retaining the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands. The proposed Amendment includes proposed Hillside Development Standards for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation that will establish the framework to preserve public lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation in natural open space while retaining the existing residential / agricultural character of privately- owned lands. Hillside Development Standards will facilitate and permit the orderly development of private and public properties within the HR-SM (Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita) and OS-C-SM (Conservation-Santa Margarita) Zoning Districts of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. The implementation of the Zoning Districts would allow no more than one dwelling unit per ten acres within the HR-SM zone (and limited development within the OS-C-S zone). In conjunction with the proposed Zoning Districts, the Hillside Development Standards will effectively preserve the rural character of the area. It will also protect and preserve natural and biological resources by carefully considering the size, type, location, density and intensity of development based on available infrastructure, the geographic steepness of terrain, presence of unique geographic conditions and constraints, and presence of environmentally sensitive resources and habitat. Furthermore, the development standards will ensure sensitive site design related to grading, landscape architecture and architecture. If approved, the proposed Amendment will establish the framework to retain the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. D. The proposed Amendment protects the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The proposed Amendment includes proposed zoning and development standards, which protect the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ("SMER') by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The majority of the project area is undisturbed and is in a pristine natural area, of which over 85% of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation boundary has been conserved as part of the SMER. To maintain protection of the SMER, the City's proposes to zone this area as OS-C-SM (Conservation- Santa Margarita), which limits development. The Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is designed to serve as a living laboratory or an open classroom. Ail field stations are within natural areas and scientific monitoring stations are installed at various locations within the Santa Margarita Ecological Preserve Area to assist SDSU with continual research and educational programs. The pristine nature of the project area, as well as the property located within the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, has made this area a valuable resource for ecological and environmental research. The need to keep an intact ecosystem for study and education of current and future generations of students also requires buffer lands around the SMER. The Annexation, if approved, in conjunction with associated Amendments to support the General Plan, will preserve the SMER and its surroundings, which is an integral part of preserving and protecting the entire Santa Margarita River. This vital ecological feature is one of the last free flowing rivers in the coastal southern California region. As such, the annexation represents a significant area of value for native wildlife, and a great variety of sensitive biological resources that are known to exist, or potentially exist, within the undeveloped portions of the Santa Margarita Area. Furthermore, the research potential and unique ecological value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is an objective of the City's request for the annexation of this area. The integration of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the Temecula city limits will enable the City to implement the proposed General Plan and Zoning Amendments and maintain consistency and compatibility with the City's goals for this area, including preserving natural conditions and resources as well as the scenic hillsides. Ultimate approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation by LAFCO is required. If approved, the proposed Amendment will establish the framework to retain the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. This action will enable the city to limit land uses within and surrounding properties adjacent to the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, that are incompatible with this biologically sensitive and ecologically rich property. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Resolutions and Ordinances substantially in the form of those attached here to, which would: A. Amend the City's General Plan to add the SMAA to the City's General Plan and provide general plan land use designations for the SMAA (See Exhibit A), contingent upon LAFCO approval of the Annexation; and, B. Amend Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code to adopt proposed Hillside Residential - Santa Margarita (HR-SM) and Open Space Conservation - Santa Margarita) OS-C-SM) zoning designations and regulations, and related code amendments (See Exhibit B); and, C. Pre-zone the SMAA to Hillside Residential - Santa Margarita (HR-SM) and Open Space Conservation - Santa Margarita (OS-C-SM) (See Exhibit C); and, D. Request that the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission extend the City's Sphere of Influence to include the SMAA (See Exhibit D); and, E. Request that the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission Allow the City to Annex the SMAA area into the City's jurisdiction (See Exhibit E). Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of November, 00 . John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: /e Ubno ks e~ {SEAL] STAT~QF (gLFORNIA ) ' COUINVICF-WERSIDE )ss CtTY~OE.TEjut CULA ) ' i,: b6b6ie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby cert fi y that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 08-53 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of November 2008, by the following vote: AYES: 5 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Harter, Telesio NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary DRAFT EXHIBIT A CC RESOLUTION - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO INCORPORATE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (HR) AND OPEN SPACE (OS) AS THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WITHIN THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4,997 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (PA07-0225) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council directed staff to initiate a feasibility study of an Annexation and Sphere of Influence Expansion of approximately 4,600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of the San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On March 6, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council adopted Resolution No. 07-23 to initiate proceedings for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. C. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan and Change of Zone Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary (collectively the "Amendment'). D. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Amendment and environmental review on November 19, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and DRAFT interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Amendment the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council certify the EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Amendment. H. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Amendment, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council approve the Project, including the General Plan Amendment. 1. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Amendment at which time all persons interested in the proposed Amendment had the opportunity to, and did, address the City Council on these matters. Following receipt of all public testimony the City Council closed the hearing. J. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the project and the Final EIR, at a duly noticed public hearing, and by adoption of Resolution No. certified the Final EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Amendment, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Amendment integrates the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan. The proposed Amendment integrates the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan by amending the City's General Plan Land Use Map to adopt General Plan Land Use Designations for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation consisting of Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS). Currently, 554 acres of the 4,997 acres of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation are located within the City's Sphere of Influence and are already designated on the City's General Plan Land Use Map with 318 acres as Open Space (OS) and 236 acres Hillside Residential (HR). The Amendment will adopt the remaining 4,443 acres into the City's General Plan Land Use Map designating 3,966 acres as Open (OS) and 477 acres as Hillside Residential (HR). In total, the Santa Margarita Area Annexation encompasses 4,997 acres of which 4,284 acres will be designated as Open Space (OS) and 713 acres will be designated as Hillside DRAFT Residential (HR). The Amendment is contingent upon the ultimate approval by Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission ("LAFCO') and, if approved, the proposed General Plan Amendment will integrate the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the City's General Plan. B. The proposed Amendment implements the direction, goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The proposed Amendment implements the direction, goals and policies outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The Santa Margarita Area Annexation encompasses approximately 4,997 acres of which 4,284 acres propose Conservation-Santa Margarita (OS-C-SM) as the Zoning District to implement the Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use Designation and 713 acres propose Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR-SM) as the Zoning District to implement the Hillside Residential (HR) General Plan Land Use Designation. -The Open Space Element (Water Resources Pages OS-23 and OS-24) calls for the protection of the Santa Margarita River from development impacts supported by Goal OS-2, Policies 2.1 and 2.9. -The Open Space Element (Biological Resources Pages OS-25 and OS-26) emphasizes permanent dedication of open spaces in and around the community aimed to conserve resources of significance and safeguard viable ecological connections between significant natural areas supported by Goal OS-3, Policies 3.1-3.7 (Policy 3.7 specifically indicates the City's policy to maintain and enhance the resources of the Santa Margarita River to ensure the long term viability of the habitat, wildlife and wildlife movement corridors). -The Open Space Element (Open Space Page OS-26 through Page OS-28) recognizes that topographical features such as the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, as well as natural drainage courses and states that the environmental resources of the Santa Margarita River should be protected from insensitive development and activities, supported by Goal OS-5, Policies 5.1-5.3, and 5.8. -The Open Space Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including OS-9; OS-10; OS-11; OS-12; OS-13; OS-14, OS-19; OS-20, OS-21; OS-22; OS-25; OS-33; OS-34; OS-35. -The Land Use Element (Natural Resources and Community Aesthetics Page LU-47) indicates the importance of hillsides, which form an aesthetic backdrop for the community, and is supported by Goal LU-6, Policies 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4. -The Land Use Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including LU-14; LU-18, LU-20; and LU-21. The propose Hillside Development Standards specifically address LU-19 which states, "Promote preservation of hillsides surrounding the community through the following DRAFT actions: (1) Enforce hillside grading standards to naturalize the effects of grading; (2) Require the preservation of unique natural features; (3) Encourage a broad range of architectural and site planning solutions; and (4) Develop hillside development standards that consider site constraints in determining location, type and intensities of new development along the western escarpment and other surrounding hillside areas. The Amendment is contingent upon the ultimate approval by LAFCO approved. If approved, the proposed amendment will establish the framework to ensure development within the project area implements the directions, goals and policies related to the protection and preservation of natural and sensitive resources, habitat and the hillsides area as outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Policies referenced herein are hereby incorporated into this Resolution by reference as if set forth in full. C. The proposed Amendment preserves public lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation in natural open space while retaining the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands. The proposed Amendment includes proposed Hillside Development Standards for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation which will establish the framework to preserve public lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation in natural open space while retaining the existing residential / agricultural character of privately- owned lands. Hillside Development Standards will facilitate and permit the orderly development of private and public properties within the HR-SM (Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita) and OS-C-SM (Conservation-Santa Margarita) Zoning Districts of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. The implementation of the Zoning Districts would allow no more than one dwelling unit per ten acres within the HR-SM zone (and limited development within the OS-C-S zone). In conjunction with the proposed Zoning Districts, the Hillside Development Standards will effectively preserve the rural character of the area. It will also protect and preserve natural and biological resources by carefully considering the size, type, location, density and intensity of development based on available infrastructure, the geographic steepness of terrain, presence of unique geographic conditions and constraints, and presence of environmentally sensitive resources and habitat. Furthermore, the development standards will ensure sensitive site design related to grading, landscape architecture and architecture. These standards would be added to the City's Municipal Code, and made applicable to the Annexation Area contingent upon approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation by LAFCO. If approved, the proposed Amendment will establish the framework to retain the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. DRAFT D. The proposed Amendment protects the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The proposed Amendment includes proposed zoning and development standards, which protect the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ("SMER') by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The majority of the project area is undisturbed and is in a pristine natural area, of which approximately 85% of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation boundary has been conserved as part of the SMER. To maintain protection of the SMER, the City's proposes to zone this area as OS-C-SM (Conservation-Santa Margarita), which limits development. The Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is designed to serve as a living laboratory or an open classroom. All field stations are within natural areas and scientific monitoring stations are installed at various locations within the Santa Margarita Ecological Preserve Area to assist SDSU with continual research and educational programs. The pristine nature of the project area, as well as the property located within the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, has made this area a valuable resource for ecological and environmental research. The need to keep an intact ecosystem for study and education of current and future generations of students also requires buffer lands around the SMER. The Annexation, if approved, in conjunction with associated Amendments to support the General Plan, will preserve the SMER and its surroundings, which is an integral part of preserving and protecting the entire Santa Margarita River. This vital ecological feature is one of the last free flowing rivers in the coastal southern California region. As such, the annexation represents a significant area of value for native wildlife, and a great variety of sensitive biological resources that are known to exist, or potentially exist, within the undeveloped portions of the Santa Margarita Area. Furthermore, the research potential and unique ecological value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is an objective of the City's request for the annexation of this area. The integration of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation into the Temecula City limits will enable the City to adopt the proposed Amendment and maintain consistency and compatibility with the City's goals for this area, including preserving natural conditions and resources as well as the scenic hillsides. Ultimate approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation is by LAFCO. If approved, the proposed Amendment will establish the framework to retain the existing residential and agricultural character of privately owned lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. This action will enable the City to limit land uses within and surrounding properties adjacent to the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, that are incompatible with this biologically sensitive and ecologically rich property. DRAFT Section 3. General Plan Amendment. A. The property as shown on Exhibit 1, and described in Exhibit 2, is hereby designated as Hillside Residential (HR), which shall become the General Plan Land Use Designation upon annexation of the property to the City. B. The property as shown on Exhibit 3 and described in Exhibit 4, is hereby designated as Open-Space (OS), which shall become the General Plan Land Use Designation upon annexation of the property to the City. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. DRAFT PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk r Santa Margarita Area Annexation \ i ~ ~H ter, s ,MVw ,j ~ vw• 6°' si r~ n _ ,.fir (r EL N I ! r . 4 \ ~ i E k EIFNF r T. i r I 1 ^ ~ 'w -T l~ -I r 8 Cr11~ ~ r yf ~ I Y I HIR 1 ` - - - _ _ - HR v Rroereiae County vuvneoRUU San Diego County a 3 BEnMI ~ ~ z § CISL " i WBOW CREEK R IWKOUf MiN y S ~ ,)L52AOELgp RnNCxBB e` mm wrx a ergs m p aRU ~ r ~ z CFEB ~b'r ~ a AiN ~ a ~ 3 RO R0.NLY/0 City of Temecula - Santa Margarita Area Annexation Q~rB.rr. M>eanMaronnnxwlen Clty ir.u,M Cege,.elJm°, Exhibit 1 me @ yB-AUq General Plan Amendment 90aeb GenerN Rm L.ll„B,,,gnar.- Properties with HR Designation ar Me sn°a Megend Fred hnnexamn ® Hilivole ReeiderNial (HR) Exhibit 2 Assessor Parcel Numbers with General Plan Amendment Hillside Residential (HR) Designation 918090016 918090001 918090039 918100004 918090012 918090006 918090036 918100007 918090026 918090005 918090031 918100006 918090028 918090017 918060022 918090008 918090011 918120044 918060021 918090021 918090024 918090023 918080008 918090013 918060013 918090019 918090043 918090007 918100003 918090010 918060010 918110001 918090002 918100005 918060009 918060008 918090003 918090014 918090033 918090034 918090004 918100008 918090042 918090040 918090025 918090018 918130031 918090037 918110002 918090027 918110028 918090030 918100001 918090009 918100002 918090038 918100012 918090032 918090015 918090035 918090020 918130043 918090029 918060011 918090022 918060023 918080009 918060024 Santa Margarita Area Annexation - I ; VM `A fp~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~J -i 51 t ~µV^ ~ Y CNL_E3 XR.1 z\ _ ~q. 1~b rV1 r - n o amp 4 r aYF ~ 1 ASP { E 0 vV N5: b b b J Lu i n.Cn a - ~ Y 1 I f i i RiveniCe County 3 F+r VNpONOMMa San Diego County 'QrFj, k g Otryy ~ i L001( °TN GIST i eDOWCREEa o ; 'SOIR S b 95 .05tA060.10 tiS w RANG Q~ 65M r 4!111 N0 O 3 p- S RFMS a o~z Vf5 °i~ fi ~ pe- O ~ 33O ,/V x J REgO Lr11 0 ~CNO City of Temecula - Santa Margarita Area Annexation ro RayaYM.a.nrc..~°° Exhibit 3 y TsmcrY Cam°~ye Llmaa General Plan Amendment 9beela ~,„,a,,,anL., VI,. D.,,-°.- Properties with OS Designation 1~Qrli~E~a Maganla A;n MnnaOOn " Open Spaca (CS) Exhibit 4 Assessor Parcel Numbers with General Plan Amendment Open Space (OS) Designation 940250002 918070014 940260005 940250003 918070011 940260002 940260003 918050009 940260004 940280006 918070019 918060018 940250006 918080011 918040011 918060014 918050003 918050008 918080007 918080010 918060019 918050006 918050002 918050001 918060007 918070012 918070018 918040003 918070008 918080001 918060001 918050005 918080003 918040004 918060017 918050007 918060020 918060015 918060002 918060003 918080002 918050004 918060006 918040012 918080006 918060016 918060004 940260001 DRAFT EXHIBIT B CC ORDINANCE - ZONING AMENDMENT DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AND AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA BY ADOPTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL-SANTA MARGARITA (HR-SM) AND OPEN SPACE CONSERVATION DISTRICT-SANTA MARGARITA (OS-C-SM) AND ADOPTING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A PRE-ZONING OF THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 4,997 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE PRE-EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (PA07-0225) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council directed staff to initiate a feasibility study of an Annexation and Sphere of Influence Expansion of approximately 4600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of the San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On March 6, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council adopted Resolution No. 07-23 to initiate proceedings for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. C. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initialized Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan and Change of Zone Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary ("Project"). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed. by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. DRAFT E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on November 19, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Amendment the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council certify the EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Amendment.. H. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Amendment, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council approve the Project, including the Zone Text Amendment. 1. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Amendment at which time all persons interested in the proposed Amendment had the opportunity to, and did, address the City Council on these matters. Following receipt of all public testimony the City Council closed the hearing. J. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the project and the Final EIR, at a duly noticed public hearing, and by adoption of Resolution No. certified the Final EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Section 2. Table 17.03.010 (Planning and Zoning Approval Authority) of Section 17.03.010 of Chapter 17.03 (Administration of Zoning) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code, is hereby amended to add a new row immediately following the row entitled "Secondary Dwelling Unit," to read as follows, with all other aspects of the table remaining unchanged: DRAFT Table 17.03.010 Plan nin and Zoning A roval Authorit Application Administrative Planning Planning City Approval Director Commission Council "Hillside Development Permit XV Section 3. A new Section 17.04.060 (Hillside Development Permit) is hereby added to Chapter 17.04 (Permits) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: "17.04.060 Hillside Development Permit A. Purpose and Intent. A Hillside Development Permit is required to facilitate and permit the orderly development of property within the HR-SM (Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita) and the OS-C-SM (Conservation-Santa Margarita) Zoning Districts within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. The permit process will ensure that projects comply with a set of hillside development standards aimed a protecting the public health, safety and welfare; protecting and preserving natural and biological resources for long-term benefit of the City by carefully considering the size, type, location, density, and intensity of development based on available infrastructure; the geographic steepness of terrain; presence of unique geographic conditions and constraints; and presence of environmentally sensitive areas. Specific regulations and standards address the following City objectives: B. Application Requirements. Applications for a Hillside Development Permit shall be completed in accordance with the Section 17.03.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code. C. Authority of Hearing Bodies for a Hillside Development Permit. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to hear and act upon a Hillside Development Permit in accordance with the Temecula Development Code. The City Council shall have the authority to hear and act upon any appeal to the decision of the Planning Commission, pursuant to Section 17.03.090 of the Development Code. D. Hearing and Notice. Upon the determination that a Hillside Development Permit application is complete, a public hearing shall be scheduled with the Planning Commission. Notice of the time, date and place of public hearing shall be given as provided in Section 17.03.040 of this Code. DRAFT E. Approval. A Hillside Development Permit may, based on findings set for in this Section, be approved, conditionally approved or denied after a public hearing. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council, pursuant to Section 17.03.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code. F. Findings. The Planning Commission may approve or conditionally approve a Hillside Development Permit only when the following findings can be made: 1. The Hillside Development Permit does not permit uses that are not otherwise allowed in the zone. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the nature, character and use of the surrounding area. 3. The proposed use will not adversely affect adjacent residents or structures. 4. The nature and location of the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the community. 5. The Hillside Development Permit places suitable conditions on the project to protect surrounding properties. G. Notice of Decision. A copy of the notice of decision shall be provided to the applicant in accordance with Section 17.03.040.E of the Temecula Municipal Code. H. Revocation. A Hillside Development Permit may be revoked or modified by the Planning Commission in accordance with the provisions of Section 17.03.080 of the Temecula Municipal Code." Section 4. A new subsection H (Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR-SM) is hereby added to Section 17.06.020 of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of Section 17.06.020 remaining unchanged: "H. Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR-SM). The Hillside Residential- Santa Margarita zoning district is intended to provide for development of very low density residential uses within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation boundaries. This includes properties that have severe development constraints such as areas with slopes over twenty-five percent, biological resources and, limited emergency access. Typical lot sizes in the HR-SM district are equal to or greater than 10 acres." Section 5. A new column entitled "HR-SM" immediately following the column entitled "H," along with a new footnote 9, is hereby added to Table 17.06.030 DRAFT (Residential Districts) of 17.06.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of the table remaining unchanged: Description of Use "HR-SM9 Residential Single-family detached P Duplex (two-family dwellings) - Single-family attached (greater than two units) Multiple-family - Manufactured homes P Mobilehome park Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or P dependent or neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or C dependent or neglected children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or P fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or C more) Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more) C Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly 6 - Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities Secondary dwelling units 7 P Granny flat P Guest house P Family day care homes-small P Family day care homes-large' C Day care centers C Bed and breakfast establishments 6 C Emergency shelters C Transitional housing C N F on-Residential DRAFT Description of Use "HR-SM9 Agriculture/open space uses s C Religious institutions C Public utility facilities C Educational institutions C Libraries Medical marijuana dispensary - Museums and art galleries (not for profit) Kennels and catteries s - Noncommercial keeping of horses, cattle, sheep and goats s P Temporary real estate tract offices P Recreational vehicle storage yard 3 Parking for commercial uses - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - Convalescent facilities - Golf courses - Home occupations P Construction trailers 5.6 P„ Notes: '9 Development within the HR-SM zoning district is subject to Section 17.06.080 Hillside Development Standards." Section 6. A new column entitled "HR-SM" added immediately following the column entitled "H," is hereby added to Table 17.06.040 (Development Standards - Residential Districts) of Section 17.06.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of the table remaining unchanged: DRAFT Table 17.06.040 Development Standards - Residential Districts Residential Development Standards "HR-SM Lot Area Minimum net lot area (square feet) Minimum net lot area (acres) • • • 10 Dwelling Units per net acre . Lot Dimensions Minimum lot frontage at front property line (feet) • • • 50 Minimum lot frontage for a flag lot at the front property line 40 (feet) Minimum width at required front setback area (feet) • • • 100 Minimum average width (feet) • 100 Minimum lot depth (feet) 150 Setbacks Minimum front yard (feet) • • • 40 Minimum corner side yard (feet) • • • 40 Minimum interior side yard (feet) • • • 25 Minimum rear yard (feet) 25 Other Requirements Maximum height (feet) Subject to Section 17.06.080 Maximum percent of lot coverage Subject to Section 17.06.080 Open space required Subject to Section 17.06.080 Private open space/per unit Subject to Section 17.06.080" Section 7. A new Section 17.06.080 (Hillside Development Standards) is hereby added to Chapter 17.06 (Residential Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code and Chapter 17.06 to read as follows: DRAFT "Section 17.06.080 Hillside Development Standards. A. Purpose and'Intent. This Section is established to achieve the City's objective to facilitate and permit the orderly development of property within the HR-SM zone in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation through a set of hillside development standards aimed a protecting the public health, safety and welfare; protecting and preserving natural and biological resources for long-term benefit of the City and the broader community, recognizing the inherent value in the properties subject to the HR-SM Zone; allowing size, type, location, density, and intensity of development based on available infrastructure; the geographic steepness of terrain, presence of unique geographic conditions and constraints; and presence of environmentally sensitive areas; and optimizing the use of sensitive site design, grading, landscape architecture, and architecture, all to achieve the City's objectives. Specific regulations and standards address the following City objectives: 1. To protect the value of the community and the subject property of ridgelines, prominent landforms, rock outcroppings, open space areas, hydrologic features, wildlife communities, unique and sensitive habitat and vegetation communities, and other natural, biological, archaeological/historical, and scenic resources. 2. To preserve the visual and aesthetic quality of hillsides as viewed from the surrounding community. 3. To promote and encourage a variety of high quality, alternative architectural and energy efficient development designs and concepts appropriate for hillside areas. 4. To preserve the public health, safety, and welfare and specifically protect the public and property from hazards such as seismic, geologic, and fire. B. Applicability and Permit Required. This Section applies to all properties within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation that are located within the HR-SM Zoning District. In addition to any other permit or approval required by this Code, any person proposing to subdivide, grade, erect, or construct into, over, or on top of property within the HR-SM Zoning Districts shall first obtain a land use entitlement through the approval of a Hillside Development Permit pursuant to Section 17.04.060 to ensure compliance with this Section. DRAFT C. Definitions. The following terms shall have the following meanings for purposes of this Section: 1. Accessory Facilities: Buildings, structures, roads, driveways, walls or fences incidental to permitted, or conditionally permitted, use. 2. Disturb: Alter the natural surface of the land or the natural vegetation by any means, including, but not limited to, grading, clearing, brushing, grubbing, or landscaping. 3. Graded Slope: All the faces of a graded slope, from the toe of the slope to the top of the slope, whether the faces are covered by natural vegetation, riprap, retaining walls or other material. 4. Hill: A well-defined natural elevation that extends above surrounding terrain. 5. Hillside: The side or slope of a hill. 6. Hillside Development Permit: An entitlement based upon an application which includes all required submittal documents that comprehensively evaluated to determine its impacts on neighboring property and the community as a whole, from the standpoint of the site, landscape design, architecture, materials, colors, lighting, signs, in accordance with the applicable development standards for the zone, as well as the Hillside Development Standards. 7. Hillside Development Standards: The Hillside Development Standards approved by the City Council of the City of Temecula as now exist and as may from time to time be amended. 8. MSHCP: The Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan as adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula on December 16, 2003. 9. Peak: The summit of a hill. 10. Restoration: The process of repairing a disturbed site to replicate its natural condition. 11. Ridgeline: A line connecting the highest elevation points of a ridge, running center and parallel to the long axis of the ridge. 12. Site: The parcel on which development is proposed. DRAFT 13. Slope Analysis: An analysis prepared by a California licensed land surveyor or civil engineer based on a topographic map with contour intervals not exceeding 10 feet. D. Exemptions from Hillside Development Permit. 1. The following are exempt from the provisions of this Section: (a) Any development proposal calling for the construction of a structure in a ridgeline area having received approval, pursuant to the adopted regulations in effect at the time of approval, prior to enactment of the Ordinance shall be exempt; however, the requirements of the Ordinance shall be applied if an extension of time is requested. (b) Open space projects and regional or community trails on City of Temecula owned property. (c) City or other governmental projects that receive approval by the City Council of the City of Temecula. E. Environmental Assessment Required. A Hillside Development Permit processed under this Section shall be a "project' for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act. F. Application Requirements. In addition to the application requirements of Section 17.03.030 of the Development Code, all of the following shall be submitted with a Hillside Development Permit application in the HR-SM Zoning District. 1. A site plan drawn to scale by a California licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer, showing the location of all existing peaks, ridge lines, hills, hillsides and other significant landforms including rock outcroppings, all areas within two hundred (200) feet of a peak or ridge line, the location of all existing watercourses, the location of all existing vegetation including oak trees and the type and quantity thereof, the location of all existing and proposed agricultural areas, the location of all existing and proposed dwellings and the location of all existing and proposed accessory facilities. 2. A grading plan, including a blasting permit, if necessary, subject to the requirements of Title 18 of the Temecula Municipal Code 3. A topographic map of the site, drawn to scale by a California licensed land surveyor or civil engineer, showing all the items referenced in paragraph 1 above. The scale on the topographic DRAFT map shall be no smaller than one (1) inch equals two hundred (200) feet with contour intervals not exceeding ten (10) feet. 4. A slope analysis of the site showing the following slope categories: 0-15% grade, 16-20% grade, 21-25% grade and over 25% grade prepared by a Licensed Land Surveyor or a Registered Engineer. 5. Underground utility plan. 6. A biological report for the site addressing the topics enumerated in Section (conservation required) of this ordinance. 7. A Cultural Resources Assessment prepared by a qualified by archaeologist. 8. Photographs of the portion(s) of the site that would be disturbed taken from each corner of the site and from all vantage points deemed appropriate by the Director of Planning. 9. A proposed land disturbance plan showing and describing the portion(s) of the site that would be disturbed, and the nature and extent of the disturbance. 10. A proposed erosion and sedimentation control plan showing and describing interim and ultimate erosion and sedimentation control measures. 11. A proposed landscape and habitat restoration plan, including a restoration time schedule, showing and describing how the site would be landscaped and repaired and how the natural conditions of the site would be replicated. A qualified biologist shall prepare the habitat restoration plan. 12. A proposed architectural plan showing how primary and accessory structures would be constructed. 13. A proposed exterior lighting plan showing how primary and accessory structures, and landscaping would be illuminated. 14. A line of sight analysis, visual analysis, geologic study or any other requirement deemed appropriate by the Planning Director. 15. A fuel modification plan consistent with the General Guidelines for Creating Defensible Space adopted by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, February 8, 2006. DRAFT G. Development Standards. The following development standards shall apply in the Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR-SM) Zone whenever a Hillside Development Permit is required by this Section: 1. Heiqht. (a) No dwelling, building or structure shall have more than two (2) stories. (b) On a level building pad, the maximum height of a dwelling, building or structure shall be thirty (30) feet measured from the foundation. (c) On a terraced building pad, the maximum height of a dwelling, building or structure shall be forty (40) feet measured from the lowest finished floor level, excluding any basement areas. 2. Lot Area. (a) The minimum lot size shall be ten (10) acres in the HR-SM zone. (b) Development in accordance with this Section may occur on a lot smaller than ten (10) acres in the HR-SM zone if the lot was legally created or previously existed on the effective date of this Ordinance, but no further subdivision of such a lot shall be allowed. 3. Land Disturbance. Land disturbance shall conform in all respects with the land disturbance plan approved by the Director of Planning. A land disturbance plan shall, at a minimum, meet the following requirements, but meeting these requirements does not guarantee approval of the plan. (a) Areas situated within two hundred (200) feet of a peak or ridgeline shall not be disturbed. (b) Natural slopes having a twenty-five (25) percent or greater grade shall not be disturbed. (c) The horizontal distance between a natural or graded slope and a roof, or portion thereof, shall not be less than twenty (20) feet. DRAFT (d) The vertical distance of a graded slope shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet from the toe of the slope to the top of the graded slope, unless a five (5) foot bench is placed between two (2) graded slopes and the bench is planted with vegetation similar to that growing on the portion(s) of the site that have not been disturbed. (e) The maximum height of a graded slope, including required benching, shall not exceed thirty (30) feet. (f) The use of blasting for road construction or pad grading shall be strongly discouraged and alternate construction techniques shall be used if feasible. Site disturbance and grading shall be kept to a minimum. (g) Land disturbance shall not exceed the following limitations: Land Disturbance Limitations Table HR-SM Zoning District Parcel/Lot Size Maximum Area That May Be Disturbed 10 net acres or greater 40,000 square feet Less than 10 acres 10% of the lot area (h) Land disturbance shall conform in all respects with the erosion and sedimentation control plan approved by the Director of Planning or Public Works. 4. Landscaping and Restoration. Landscaping and restoration shall conform in all respects with the landscaping and restoration plan approved by the Director of Planning. A landscaping and restoration plan shall be accompanied by a cash deposit equal to the cost of the re- vegetating all disturbed areas. The restoration plan shall be prepared by a biologist with expertise in habitat restoration. The Director of Planning shall retain this deposit until he/she is satisfied that re-vegetation has been successful, but in no event shall the Director of Planning retain the deposit for more than five (5) years. Within the five (5) year period, the Director shall have the authority to use the deposit to complete the required re-vegetation. 5. Architecture. Dwellings and accessory facilities shall conform in all respects with the architectural plan approved by the Planning Commission. DRAFT 6. Exterior Lighting. Exterior lighting shall conform in all respects with the exterior lighting plan approved by the Director of Planning. An exterior lighting plan shall, at a minimum, meet the following requirements, but meeting these requirements does not guarantee approval of the plan: (a) Lights shall not be located on the portion(s) of the site that have not been disturbed. (b) Lights shall not be located closer than ten (10) feet from any property line. (c) Lights shall be fully shielded and directed away from areas deemed inappropriate by the Director of Planning. (d) Walls and other architectural elements shall not be lighted for decorative purposes. (e) Tennis and other sport courts shall not be lighted for any purposes. (f) The maximum lighting intensity of the site shall not exceed 250 lumens when measured at any property line. 7. Energy Efficient Standards. Energy efficient standards shall be incorporated during the construction and operational phase of any structure permitted under this Section. (a) Construction of any structure for human habitation permitted under a Hillside Development Plan shall be required to exceed Title 24 standards by a minimum of 10 percent. (b) All structures for human habitation shall incorporate sealed duct systems. (c) All structures for shall incorporate fluorescent lighting where practical. (d) "Energy Star" appliances shall be installed in all structures where applicable. (e) All structures for human habitation shall incorporate high- albedo roofing. DRAFT (f) All structures for human habitation shall incorporate dual pained glass windows (g) All residential structures shall incorporate at least two of the following features to obtain a final building inspection. (1) Spectrally selective or Low-E glass on all windows and doors. (2) Enhanced insulation which exceeds Title 24 standards by at least 15 percent. (3) A landscape design that utilizes trees or other vegetation to shade the structures sidewalks, patios, and driveways. (4) Solar water heaters. (5) Photovoltaic systems to supply at a minimum 80% of the normal power needs of the structures proposed and existing based on an annual average. 8. Green Building. All residential structures will be required to incorporate one of the following features in order to obtain a final building inspection. (a) Engineered and certified wood, which is harvested in a sustainable manner. (b) Tankless water heaters. (c) Cellulose attic insulation made from recycled materials. (d) Floor coverings made from recycled or sustainable materials. 9. Environmental Protection. Projects within the HR-SM zoning district shall comply with all applicable mitigation measures adopted in conjunction with the pre- zoning and annexation of the property to the City. H. Hillside Design Standards. In deciding whether to approve a Hillside Development Permit as required by this article and any subordinate land disturbance plan, erosion and sedimentation control plan, landscaping and restoration plan, architectural plan or exterior lighting plan, the Director of Planning shall certify that the DRAFT plan complies with this Ordinance and the Hillside Design Standards. Applicants are strongly advised to consider the Hillside Design Standards in formulating the above-referenced plans. I. Relief from Development Standards. Notwithstanding the specific requirements set forth in this Section 17.06.080 above, relief from the development standards may be granted concurrently with the processing of a Hillside Development Permit in accordance with the following procedure: 1. An applicant may file an application for relief from certain development standards with the Planning Department. The application shall be filed on forms and submitted with information as required by the Department. 2. Applications for an relief from development standards shall be submitted to the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by the submittal requirements of Sections F and G of this Ordinance, and the following: (a) Fees in accordance with the most recently adopted fee schedule. (b) In certain cases, the Directors of Planning, Building and Safety, or Public Works may require the project applicant to provide additional studies, including but not limited to, geological studies and or a visual analysis of the project design either through a project simulation using computer aided three-dimensional modeling coordinated with photography showing before and after conditions or a scaled three-dimensional model showing before and after conditions. 3. The Planning Commission may approve relief from the requirements of Section (G of this Chapter) if: (a) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed alternative complies with and, furthers the intent of this ordinance. (b) The applicant demonstrates that the proposed alternative provides a design solution that is equivalent to or better than the standards prescribed in this ordinance for quality, effectiveness, durability, and safety. 4. The relief from development standards shall be heard at a public hearing of the Planning Commission. J. Conservation Required. DRAFT Any project for which a Hillside Development Permit is required by this Section shall be designed to protect wildlife habitat areas, biological corridors, native plants and plant communities, and where practicable, support interconnected, contiguous, and integrated open space systems within an area, particularly when located contiguous to open space preserve areas. A Hillside Development Permit shall be in compliance with the MSHCP. K. Hillside Cluster Development Option. 1. The purpose of the hillside cluster development option is to provide: (a) Site planning and unity of design in harmony with the natural features and constraints of specific sites, and particularly on sites possessing unique or severe topographic or hydrologic features and biological resources; (b) Protection of natural, historic and man-made elements of scenic, environmental or cultural significance; (c) Design innovation; (d) Flexibility of siting of structures and roadways; (e) More cost effective development due to decreased grading and more efficient servicing of the development with utilities, roads and other essential services; (f) Additional open space for private or community purposes; (g) A preferred planning tool for the development of land within the HR-SM zone. 2. Definitions. Cluster Open Space: Open space, either natural or functional, provided to compensate for lot size reductions from minimum lot size area requirements in the applicable zone. Public Open Space: Open space owned by a public agency, such as the City of Temecula, or the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority and maintained for scientific and biological values or in furtherance of the goals of the Western Riverside County Multi Species Habitat Conservation Plan. DRAFT Scope: The cluster development option is permitted in the HR-SM Zoning District. 3. Planned Development Overlay Required. Proposed cluster developments must be processed pursuant to the requirements of the Planned Development Overlay District as set forth in Section 17.22 of the Development Code. 4. Development Standards. (a) Minimum Site Area: None in the HR Zoning District. (b) Overall Density: Greater than 10 acres per dwelling unit in the HR Zoning District. (c) Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: No minimum lot size, as may be approved by the Hillside Development Plan. (d) Minimum Set Back Requirements: As may be approved by the Hillside Development Plan. (e) Minimum Distance Between Buildings: As may be approved by the Hillside Development Plan. (f) Utilities: Utilities shall be located within the development portion of the site wherever possible to reduce the future impact of maintenance and repair activities on cluster open space. (g) Excess cut and fill material shall be disposed of in accordance with the Title 18 of the Temecula Municipal Code. (h) Roads: All streets and highways must have horizontal and vertical alignments consistent with an approved design speed, and roadway geometrics consistent with an approved design vehicle, as specified in (the City of Temecula road design manual). (i) Landscaping: In accordance with subsection GA of this Section and section 17.32 of the Temecula Municipal Code. (j) Exterior Lighting: Any exterior lighting shall conform to subsection G.6 of this Section. (k) Environmental Protection: Cluster developments within the HR-SM district shall comply with all applicable mitigation DRAFT measures adopted in conjunction with the pre-zoning annexation of the property to the City. 5. Open Space Requirements. (a) Cluster Open Space Requirements: Cluster open space shall be designed to save as much as the natural open space feasible, but in no case shall the open space be less than 90 percent of the gross site area. (b) Cluster open space ownership and control shall be only: (1) As part of and individual, private lot with recorded open space covenants running with the land; (2) By the City of Temecula, as legally dedicated to and approved by the City Council; (3) By the Western Riverside County Resource Conservation Authority; (4) By a qualified nonprofit conservation organization as deemed acceptable by the City. (c) Cluster open space shall not include public or private streets, driveways, parking areas, channelized drainage ways, and disturbed, unvegetated areas." Section 8. A new subsection D is hereby added to Section 17.14.020 of Chapter 17.14 (Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of Section 17.14.020 remaining unchanged: "D. Conservation-Santa Margarita District (OS-C-SM). The conservation zoning district is intended for those lands within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation boundaries that are in public or quasi-public ownership for open space purposes that should remain in a natural state as much as feasible without intrusions from active uses. Improvements may be made to these areas to allow for safe limited public access or for control of erosion, geologic stability, or other public safety or utility purposes. The construction of buildings or other structures is not permitted except for flood control structures or public utility facilities, which may be permitted with the approval of a conditional use permit." Section 9. A new column entitled "OS-C-SM" immediately following the column entitled "OS-C" is hereby added to Table 17.14.030 (Schedule of Permitted Uses-Open Space) of Section 17.14.030 (Use Regulations) of Chapter 17.14 (Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula DRAFT Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of the table remaining unchanged: 17.14.030 USE REGULATIONS. The primary uses permitted in the open space zoning districts is indicated in Table 17.14.030. Table 17.14.030 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Open Space Schedule of Uses "OS-C-SM Agricultural uses - Athletic field - Bicycle paths - Campground - Caretakers quarters - Cemeteries, mausoleums and related uses - Flood control structures C Game courts, badminton, tennis, racquetball - Golf driving range not part of a golf course - Golf course and clubhouse - Golf course resort (including accessory visitor supporting - accommodations and commercial uses such as hotels, fractional ownership units, day spa, restaurants, and conference center.) Government and public utility facilities C Gymnasium Communications and microwave installations Nature centers/exhibits - Nurseries - Outdoor exhibits - Picnic group facilities - Private parks and recreation facilities - Parking areas Public parks and recreation facilities DRAFT Recreational vehicle park Riding stable, public or private Shooting galleries, ranges, archery courses Single-family dwellings (1 unit per 40 acres) Tree farms Note: All development subject to the standards set forth in Section 17.06.080. Section 10. A new column entitled "OS-C-SM" immediately following the column entitled "OS-C" is hereby added to Section 17.14.040 (Development Standards) of Chapter 17.14 (Open Space/Recreation/Conservation Zoning Districts) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows, with all other portions of the table remaining unchanged: 17.14.040 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. The development standards for the open space zoning districts are as indicated on Table 17.14.040. Table 17.14.040 Open Space Development Standards - Open Space Development Standards "OS-C-SM Minimum lot size - Maximum lot coverage . . . - Maximum height - Floor area ratio • • • - Setback from street R/W line • • • - Setback from adjoining property lines Minimum open space • • • 100%" Section 11. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 12. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiillillillillillillilliillillillillillillilliillillillillilillillillillillillilliiiim- DRAFT Section 13. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MIMIC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk DRAFT EXHIBIT C CC ORDINANCE - PRE-ZONING AMENDMENT DRAFT ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION PRE-ZONING APPROXIMATELY 4,997 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE PRE-EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (PA07-0225) WITH ZONING DESIGNATIONS HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL-SANTA MARGARITA (HR-SM) AND CONSERVATION DISTRICT-SANTA MARGARITA (OS-C- SM) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council directed staff to initiate a feasibility study of an Annexation and Sphere of Influence Expansion of approximately 4,600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On March 6, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council adopted Resolution No. 07-23 to initiate proceedings for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. C. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan and Change of Zone Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary (collectively the "Amendment'). D. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQK) and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. DRAFT F. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on November 19, 2008, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. G. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Amendment the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council certify the EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Amendment. H. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Amendment, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council approve the Project, including the Pre-Zoning. 1. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the project and the Final EIR, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, and certified the Final EIR prepared for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. J. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Pre-Zone and Zoning Amendment at which time all persons interested in the proposed Amendment had the opportunity to, and did, address the City Council on these matters. Following receipt of all public testimony the City Council closed the hearing. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Pre- Zoning, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The Proposed Amendment implements the direction, goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The proposed Pre-Zone implements the proposed and existing General Plan Land Use Designations, which ultimately implements the direction, goals and policies outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The Pre-Zone applies Zoning Districts within the Development Code to match the boundaries of the proposed General Plan Land Use Designations for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation. The Santa Margarita Area Annexation encompasses approximately 4,997 acres of which 4,284 acres propose Conservation-Santa Margarita (OS-C- SM) as the Zoning District to implement the Open Space (OS) General Plan Land Use Designation and 713 acres propose Hillside Residential-Santa DRAFT Margarita (HR-SM) as the Zoning District to implement the Hillside Residential (HR) General Plan Land Use Designation. The proposed Pre-Zoning for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation are consistent with goals, policies and implementation programs as outlined in the adopted City of Temecula General Plan including, but not limited to, the General Plan Land Use Policies identified within Table 3.4-3 of the EIR and the General Plan Goals, Policies and Implementation Programs as follows: -The Open Space Element (Water Resources Pages OS-23 and OS-24) calls for the protection of the Santa Margarita River from development impacts supported by Goal OS-2, Policies 2.1 and 2.9. -The Open Space Element (Biological Resources Pages OS-25 and OS- 26) emphasizes permanent dedication of open spaces in and around the community aimed to conserve resources of significance and safeguard viable ecological connections between significant natural areas supported by Goal OS- 3, Policies 3.1-3.7 (Policy 3.7 specifically indicates the City's policy to maintain and enhance the resources of the Santa Margarita River to ensure the long term viability of the habitat, wildlife and wildlife movement corridors). -The Open Space Element (Open Space Page OS-26 through Page OS- 28) recognizes that topographical features such as the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, as well as natural drainage courses and states that the environmental resources of the Santa Margarita River should be protected from insensitive development and activities, supported by Goal OS-5, Policies 5.1-5.3, and 5.8. -The Open Space Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including OS-9; OS-10; OS-11; OS-12; OS-13; OS-14, OS-19; OS- 20, OS-21; OS-22; OS-25; OS-33; OS-34; OS-35. -The Land Use Element (Natural Resources and Community Aesthetics Page LU-47) indicates the importance of hillsides, which form an aesthetic backdrop for the community, and is supported by Goal LU-6, Policies 6.1, 6.3 and 6.4. -The Land Use Implementation Programs of the City of Temecula General Plan including LU-14; LU-18, LU-20; and LU-21. The propose Hillside Development Standards specifically address LU-19 which states, "Promote preservation of hillsides surrounding the community through the following actions: (1) Enforce hillside grading standards to naturalize the effects of grading; (2) Require the preservation of unique natural features; (3) Encourage a broad range of architectural and site planning solutions; and (4) Develop hillside development standards that consider site constraints in determining location, type and intensities of new development along the western escarpment and other surrounding hillside areas. DRAFT The Zoning is contingent upon the ultimate approval by LAFCO approved. If approved, the proposed amendment will establish the framework to ensure development within the project area implements the directions, goals and policies related to the protection and preservation of natural and sensitive resources, habitat and the hillsides area as outlined within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Policies referenced herein are hereby incorporated into this Resolution by reference as if set forth in full. B. The proposed Amendment protects the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The proposed zoning and development standards would protect the research value of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ("SMER') by prohibiting incompatible land uses within adjacent properties. The majority of the project area is undisturbed and is in a pristine natural area, of which approximately 85% of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation boundary has been conserved as part of the SMER. Section 3. Pre-Zoning. A. The property as shown on Exhibit 1, and described in Exhibit 2, is hereby pre-zoned Hillside Residential - Santa Margarita (HR-SM), which shall become the zoning upon annexation of the property to the City. B. The property as shown on Exhibit 3 and described in Exhibit 4, is hereby pre-zoned Open-Space Conservation Santa Margarita (OC-C-SM), which shall become the zoning upon annexation of the property to the City. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, but will not become effective unless and until the Annexation of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation is approved by the Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. DRAFT PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk eA Santa Margarita Area Annexation Q P f` q I 1 ~ ~ . v A t / ` X51 Y ~•.tv '0"~yfMaO r ~ 6`- , FTt - ~ ~ V A ~ _ / \ X60 t OC t". _ I I ~ ~ay r ~Efl.1 _ b 1 t~ - I mot R j y EyF ETNA Lie,. -t / J N°E 1 u ` i , I Y ' - HRSM x 33 c 8 WLCul ~u - HRSM x x HRSM x x x V x x IN x x X x x x x v Riverside County VIN PgNOROdIR Rp r San Diego County it, g OEµy z a GIST " g NBOW CREEK O~ 7n lWNg1T YTN 3 HSTADELRq tiz M FuNCNBR 4e MTN y MOTH e o s'y LP0.R 13 RnN o Rd° at W ENO .Na N.q'Ma R,.a Rnyiamn City of Temecula - Santa Margarita Area Annexation Gry of TemecuY CeR>M U.. Exhibit 1 Z°""'°Ba M ant.. aons -Zoning Amendment b ye Sante Area MneiaOOn Pre RS" Properties with HRSM Zoning Designation t~ Exhibit 2 Assessor Parcel Numbers with Pre-zoning Designation of Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita District (HR-SM) 918090016 918090001 918090039 918100004 918090012 918090006 918090036 918100007 918090026 918090005 918090031 918100006 918090028 918090017 918060022 918090008 918090011 918120044 918060021 918090021 918090024 918090023 918080008 918090013 918060013 918090019 918090043 918090007 918100003 918090010 918060010 918110001 918090002 918100005 918060009 918060008 918090003 918090014 918090033 918090034 918090004 918100008 918090042 918090040 918090025 918090018 918130031 918090037 918110002 918090027 918110028 918090030 918100001 918090009 918100002 918090038 918100012 918090032 918090015 918090035 918090020 918130043 918090029 918060011 918090022 918060023 918080009 918060024 - Santa Margarita Area Annexation 1 P _ i Fem. •S~°°~ ~ ' v~ ,.d. ~ " J ` .a $ ~ I_Y c` ..g e. .fib ,7 ' ~ . _ GSERA n - . f ~ ~w 1 I ~ ' Y s t s r~ i} f Imo, \\tt m EfF' ELERA.~ T r. °p y A'WYLE rvC.`A y i i ( ~ + wa wyr w~ wy wa wy ~ _ •`APf I /i 1 ~ ~ i r'I„ ~v'..''`i.^w~ ^~t. titi„ ^w~ ^i r.:'S^~~ w„'L, EW w w' ~C" wA w w w q A w~ w K ..yiw~- ^..'r~rw•y'~~i'~wrw'+`~^ ....y„..~ i.i~G^h`~' ti 'ti :y'~^'r..►'rr w w sC ~ w n w w w w 3' 1L - . 1 .v. a _w. ~:-w_•~.w~n~wr •2 rv~ r. ~_~1 ^~ti^r~w W~ 4. °•t '.yw~.Ati,r.^L~t_,rytiii i_ ~yt^ ~ - _ ^I~'Nr I • .1Ma M w ^/~.n ^ a0. ~i...~s I yy P tl~ cSr Riverside County m moRAGA M1`,y San Diego County ~mL i ~2 z m 015 g RBOe'CREEI( lOq(WYIN w £ Pb m s ~ VR1A~0.W tiS MJ RNNO, oem + o e kPAS i i x~ LAPS $ ti ~03 : c ARN ~ ~ RERO LIU anY MVryvnYA,.vAme.Alm City of Temecula - Santa Margarita Area Annexation LRr °tr.mxua c°mo.n. unto. r -6Vevb ~T~ Exhibit 3 Zo' "oto"°"` Pre-Zoning Amendment tie Des ns1~9 Arev Mne.vEOn A~ OfiLSM Properties with OS-C-SM Zoning Designation Exhibit 4 Assessor Parcel Numbers with Pre-zoning Designation of Conservation-Santa Margarita District (OS-C-SM) 940250002 918070014 940260005 940250003 918070011 940260002 940260003 918050009 940260004 940280006 918070019 918060018 940250006 918080011 918040011 918060014 918050003 918050008 918080007 918080010 918060019 918050006 918050002 918050001 918060007 918070012 918070018 918040003 918070008 918080001 918060001 918050005 918080003 918040004 918060017 918050007 918060020 918060015 918060002 918060003 918080002 918050004 918060006 918040012 918080006 918060016 918060004 940260001 DRAFT EXHIBIT D CC RESOLUTION - LAFCO SPHERE OF INFLUENCE DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 08- RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS TO EXTEND THE CITY OF TEMECULA'S SPHERE OF INFLUENCE TO THE TERRITORY DESCRIBED AS THE SANTA MARGARITA SPHERE EXPANSION AREA COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 4,997 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE PRE- EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE-15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (PA07-0225) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council directed staff to study the feasibility of a Sphere of Influence expansion and annexation of approximately 4600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of the San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan and Change of Zone Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary (collectively, the "Project'). A legal description of the proposed Sphere of Influence expansion and proposed Santa Margarita Area Annexation is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. C. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental DRAFT Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. D. The Planning Commission, considered the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the Project at a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2008, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify concerning the Draft EIR and the proposed Project. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project and the Draft EIR, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08-_ recommending that the City Council certify a Final EIR for the Project dated September 22, 2008, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record of information received at the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council (1) approve a Resolution amending the General Plan Land Use Element to incorporate Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS) as the General Plan Land Use Designations within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation; (2) approve a Pre-Zoning Ordinance for the pre-zoning of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation; and (3) approve a Zoning Ordinance Amendment amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code and amending the official zoning map of the City of Temecula by adopting zoning designations Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR- SM) and Conservation District-Santa Margarita (OS-C-SM) and adopting Hillside Development Standards. G. On [INSERT DATE] the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed Project and the proposed Final EIR, at which time all persons interested in the proposed Final EIR, proposed General Plan Amendment, Pre-Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Amendment, as well as the proposed Sphere Expansion and proposed Santa Margarita Annexation, had the opportunity to comment on and testify about the proposed Final EIR and proposed Project. After considering all the testimony and comments and the entire record concerning the Project and the proposed Final EIR, the City Council certified the Final EIR prepared for the Project, adopted Findings pursuant to the CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to CEQA. H. At this same hearing, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed General Plan Amendment, Pre-Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Code Amendment, and all the comments and testimony thereon and the entire record concerning the Project, and the City Council adopted Resolution No. _adopting the General Plan Amendment and gave the first reading of the Pre-Zoning Ordinance No. _ and Zoning DRAFT Code Amendment Ordinance No. On [INSERT DATE] the City held the second readings of and adopted Pre-Zoning Ordinance No. and Zoning Code Amendment No. 1. On [INSERT DATE], the City met with the County to discuss the proposed Sphere of Influence expansion [STATE OUTCOME OF MEETING]. J. On [INSERT DATE] the City gave notice to LAFCO that the Planning Commission would be considering the proposed Sphere of Influence expansion on [INSERT DATE] and that the City Council would hold a hearing to consider the proposed Sphere of Influence expansion on a subsequent date, and on [INSERT DATE], the City gave notice to LAFCO that it would be considering adoption of a proposed resolution requesting that LAFCO consider its application to expand its Sphere of Influence as described above and shown in the map referenced above. K. After considering all the information in the record and the testimony at the public hearing, the City Council determined that it wished to pursue the proposed Sphere of Influence expansion for the following reasons: (1) The Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve is now partially within the City's Sphere of Influence and the City believes the entire Reserve should be located within the City's Sphere of Influence. Placing the entire Reserve and some surrounding areas in the City's Sphere of Influence would facilitate annexation of the entire Reserve and surrounding areas to the City. This would allow the City to ensure the protection and preservation of the Reserve and ensure that development in the surrounding areas does not occur in a manner that is incompatible with the Reserve; (2) To protect and preserve the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve as Open Space and an educational resource and protect and preserve the Santa Margarita River; (3) To protect the biological resources located within the Annexation Area. 181 animal species and an additional 331 plant species have been documented and observed within the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve including 20 sensitive species identified by the Department of Fish and Game as occurring within or in proximity to the proposed Annexation Area. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby requests the Local Agency Formation Commission to take all proceedings necessary for Sphere of Influence expansion to include the entire Santa Margarita Reserve and the surrounding areas as described above and shown in Exhibit A and directs the City Managerto file this Resolution and any necessary application documents with LAFCO. DRAFT PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk DRAFT EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SANTA MARGARITA PROPOSED SPHERE OF INFLUENCE EXPANSION AREA AND ANNEXATION AREA EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 THROUGH 28 INCLUSIVE AND SECTIONS 33 THROUGH 36 INCLUSIVE, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF VIA GORRION AND CAMINO ESTRIBO AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP NO. 6835, ON FILE IN BOOK 29, PAGES 27 THROUGH 41 INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 73' 40' 46" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CAMINO ESTRIBO, A DISTANCE OF 282.62 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TEMECULA RANCHO AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 56 PAGES 39 THROUGH 41 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 39' 48' 32" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE; O A DISTANCE OF 1694.79 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 24 AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 56 PAGES 39 THROUGH 41 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 00' 00' 00" ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST Q QUARTER OF SECTION 24, A DISTANCE OF 2731.93 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 24 PER SAID RECORD OF SURVEY; ® THENCE SOUTH 00' 19' 01" EAST ALONG THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2654.01 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SECTION 25; THENCE SOUTH 00' 02' 43" WEST ALONG THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF Q SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2697.75 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 25; © THENCE SOUTH 00' 24' 22" WEST ALONG THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 2658.14 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 00' 23' 04" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 2646.09 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER O THEREOF, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH AS SHOWN BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENTATION MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF SAID COUNTY IN BOOK 205 PAGES 134 THROUGH 144 INCLUSIVE; PAGE 1 OF 4 i ® THENCE NORTH 88' 55' 36" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2659.40 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 89' 55' 18" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 5259.28 FEET TO THE !~9 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN PAGE 8832 OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89' 59' 23" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SOUTHERLY 10 LINE OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF 2741.72 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH 88' 59' 17" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SAID 11 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF 2721.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH 89' 40' 46" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SOUTHERLY 1© LINE OF SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2707.45 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 .CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 89' 27' 23" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SAID 13 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2694.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 00' 16' 35" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 14 33, A DISTANCE OF 2637.86 FEET TO THE WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 10, PAGE 22, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 00' 22' 47" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 15 1331.69 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 89' 50' 20" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH is 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2653.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00' 22' 10" WEST ALONG THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID 17 SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 1313.47 FEET TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 89' 26' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 18 SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2636.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 00' 29' 50" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SECTION 28, 19 A DISTANCE OF 1344.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SANTA ROSA RANCHO AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 56 PAGE 39 THROUGH 41, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; PAGE 2 OF 4 THENCE NORTH 67' 19' 58" EAST ALONG SAID SANTA ROSA RANCHO BOUNDARY 20 LINE, A DISTANCE OF 12997.33 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 92 PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE SOUTH 00' 00' 20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 999.86 FEET TO THE 21 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT EASEMENT PER INSTRUMENT NO. 109720 RECORDED 12-13-1967, ALSO SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 51' 51' 46" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EASEMENT LINE, A 2~2 DISTANCE OF 815.78 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3100.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID EASEMENT NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10' 25' 39", AN ARC LENGTH OF 564.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41' 26' 07' EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EASEMENT LINE, A 24 DISTANCE OF 333.94 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO GAZAPO AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; 25 THENCE SOUTH 06' 17' 41" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 37.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 45' 00' 21" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET TO THE 26 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; 27 THENCE NORTH 87' 14' 44" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1138.19 FEET; 28 THENCE NORTH 60' 47' 31" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 835.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76' 29' 23 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A 29 DISTANCE OF 457.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 97 PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 07' 27 46' EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 97, 30 A DISTANCE OF 918.42 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO POTRO PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 28' 00' 57" WEST 466.70 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ESTRIBO, SAID INTERSECTION 31 BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 28- 00' 57" WEST; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ESTRIBO 3~2 NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15' 00' 28", AN ARC LENGTH OF 157.16 FEET; PAGE 3 OF 4 THENCE NORTH 46' 58' 35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 714.57 FEET ALONG SAID 33 CENTERLINE TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET; ® THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26' 42' 11", AN ARC LENGTH OF 279.63 FEET; 35 THENCE NORTH 73' 40' 46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1016.47 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AREA = 4,429 ACRES, MORE OR LESS SEE ENCLOSED EXHIBIT "A" PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION V QpOR ES5f03,1 col~o~ Fyn v W Na .28159 ^1F E* 3/31/08 ~t KEVIN B. COZAD DATE mf CIVIL REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 ~I~OF CAl1F~~ EXPIRES: 3-31-08 PAGE 4 OF 4 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X VICINITY AND;' )SHEET INDEX MAP LEGEND ANNEXATION BOUNDARY EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY 4,429 ACRES MORE OR LESS 918001002 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 1 INDICATES EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE 17-1 / OF INFLUENCE E rt~~ of tENF~~ENc ~~l ~ ~SPNEIR OF u+ 1 SHEET2 r HC. V L1\ SHEETS / SHEET ` S - ( ESHEET SPHE RE S-HE-El INFLUENCE CE ANNEXATION BOUNDARY ( RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHEET 6~SRE- 5~ SAN DIEGO COUNTY VICINITY MAP - i-11= ' -Ilkm SHEET INDEX MAP DAD] D DD: D) ~ Scale 1" = 12,000' v 9SOFESSIO* Scale 1' = 6,000' Co21~ ~gc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y z SPHERE OF INFLUENCE m No. 26159 m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 * Exp. 3/31/OB ¢ AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA SA CIVIL air RANCHO. SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED KEVIN B. COZAD DATE ATE OF CAt.1F~ TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 1 OF 10 EXPIRES: 3-31-08 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED ) LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X EXISTING SPHERE P g \ C/L VIA GOPROOg OFTHE INFLCITYUENCOFE C/L CAMINO ESTRIBO ® TEMECULA p P jC s ® 1 940250002 t9o u} ® 940260004 ~ NE CORNER OF C/L CAMINO ESIrRIBO GOVT LOT 4 0 _ - ® 940260002 2 005 C/L CAMINO POTRO 940250003 RPNG~ `R.S. 56/39-41 W 9 260001 PM 10814 \ W ® P.M.B. 78 U) C'PN~cPinlaPPO ~-"-f/ PAGES 5-8 o c14 ® 916070014 W W------ SECTION 24 1 T.8S, R.3W !918070019 1 918070012 1 918070011 918070018 940280006 ; 23 24 SES 1/4 C 24 4 918080002 1918080003 26 25 918080010 918080011 SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 10 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE- REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o9SOFESS1 EXPIRES: 3-31-08 C02~0 '"yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ca rZn BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 -26 GW6 No. 26159 :0 AND SECTIONS 33- 36, T. 6 S, R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND * Exp. 3/31/06 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED CI V1%. a~! TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Scale 1" = 1,000 'lf OF cp'L ~ OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 2 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED ) LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 2 26 J25 T _ F I 918090008 I ~ I r \ I w 918080009 W i ~ SECTION 25 i U0 T.8S, R.3W C 1/4 I-------- d SEC 25 EXISTING SPHERE OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF Q I 918080010 TEMECULA -2 d - - - I 918080011 z N II O J O L~ N O 60 26125 s 1/a v ~ SEC 25 5 I -1 -T T SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 10 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o9SOFESSIOEXPIRES: 3-31-08 COj4,0 ~y ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA _h z SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ca m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23- 28 N0. 26159 m AND SECTIONS 33 - 36. T. 8 S. R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND , at * Exp. 3/31/08 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA m o mo moo ,5,co J'f CTVI~ RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Scale 1" = 1,000' ~lF OF CAL1FO~a OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX•X SHEET 3 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 10 FOR COURSE TABLE _ 26 25 918080010 918080011 I ~ -T- T T 3 5 Z 1918090002 1 (918090007 9181000011 918100008 1 1 918090003 1 1 918090006 9181000021 918100007 1 918490001 ~ - - - -l 918090006 f- - - - + - - - ~ 918100012 1 918090004 I ( 918090009 9181000031 918100006 I L I L--- --L J 1 918090005 1 1918090010 9181000041 9181000051 CY 918060007 i i i Q 918090011 1918090012 1918090013 1 918090014 1 1918110028 --T----1----T--- I I 918090015 1 918090016 1918090017 1 918090018 ( I 0 IV- W ----t----I----t--- I I = N p` 1915090020 1918090021 1 918090022 18110001 1 818110002 l lv / LIJ 918o9oo19 i ----I----I f I try 1 9180900231 918090024 1 918090025 I 1 p JL (-v i I ISEC 36 p p 44,7 W 1918090026 1918090027 1918090028 1 918090029 Q U (r~ 918120044 918090030 1 918090031 1 918090032 1 918090033 918060018 II- --~.__--I_--_ _ - - EXISTING SPHERE I OF INFLUENCE OF THE CITY OF 918090034 1918090035 918090036 916090037 918130043 TEMECULA I I I f 3 9136 38 1918090039 1918090040 1918090042 918130031 RIVERSIDE COUNTY S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 s 1/4 SEC 36 SAN DIEGO COUNTY KEVIN B. CO D DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQqLOFESS/O~~! EXPIRES: 3-31-08 COj410 ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OFTEMECULA y SPHERE OF INFLUENCE co m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 W No. 26159 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND t,~o * Exp. 3/31/08 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA 0 1vil RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE 'lf OF CAl1fOFCALIFORNIA Scale 1" = 1,000 LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 4 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ) (AMENDED... LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X i - I 1 I 918060008 1 II I 1 ( 1 p1809002q 918060019 1 918060013 ---------I I 1 SECTIION 35 1 -918060009- 1 T.BS,I R.3W I I ~8asoo3I 918060014 918060018 1 918060021 918060010 1 I r---------1 1 180900341 918060022 918060015 ( RAINBOW GLEN IRD. 4 l 918060023 1 - 34 3 5 I 918060011 1 918090D3~ j RIVERSIDE rr 918060024 I COUNTY I 35 36 1 W W Q S 1/4 9 V SEC 35 ) S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 LLJ LLJ W SAN DIEGO COUNT`( SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 10 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DA E REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQRaFESSIOM` EXPIRES: 3-31-08 4 CO 44 ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA H SPHERE OF INFLUENCE s, BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 No. 26159 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND * Exp. 3/31/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED B00 ° °0° 'A00 ~t`~ 'rl CIVIL ate! TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1" = 1,000' OF CALIF LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 5 OF 10 EXHIBIT W AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X I 1 1 918060002 918060003 Ii 918060019 918060001 It I I I I SECTION 34 T.8S, R.3W I IF I I I r' I 918060017 I 1 Lo 918060015 ~ 33 34 ' S 1/4 1 34 35 LW . RIVERSIDE SEC 34 1 COUNTY LLu S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 w SAN DIEGO COUNTY w m U) SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN 8. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o4ROFESS/0N'~! EXPIRES: 3-31-08 *S' C0?4,o 0*' ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y SPHERE OF INFLUENCE ca Zi BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23.28 W No. 28159 m AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND E>~. 3/31/08 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED a 1 SP CIVIL TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Scale l" = 1,000' ~TF OF CALL IFO~~ OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 6 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE {AMENDED ) LAFCO NO, XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 8 © I 918040003 i C-N 1/16 SEC 33 L N 1/16 SEC 33 91$040004 © R.S. 10/22 SECTION 33 I- T.8S, R.3W I w w W 1/4 I SEC 33 i 1 I w I Lij I U) I i {I ~ L-------- v I I I 918040012 1 918040011 918060017 I S 1/•1 I 32 3 RIVERSIDE SEC 33 I COUNTY 33 34 S.D.C0. R.O.S. 8832 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE--- REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQROFESS/ON's! EXPIRES: 3-31-08 `Ee' Co 4,0 ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA _y SPHERE OF INFLUENCE to t=n BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 W NO. 26159 ^n AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND * Exp. 3/31/08 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA n , a RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED 'rlC/Vll TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Niiiia Scale 1" = 1,000' ~rf OF CAU1FOF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 7 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED .......................j LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X FZ~'NG~g ~1 (:)S~ Nt P R S J® , SP pE~ C R.S. 56/39-41 rn SECTION 28 918050002 T. 8S, R. 3W W 918050001 0 W 29 28 N 1/4 28 27 ~ SEC 33 32 33 33 34 1 R.S. 10/22 © 918040004 I 918040003 LS 1/16 918060001 EC 33 C-N 1/16 1 0 SEC 33 L-------tv --i SEE SHEET 7 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 ogSoFESStpM~( EXPIRES: 3-31-08 COZAO ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA h SPHERE OF INFLUENCE c~ m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 s No. 26159 -V AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, M 3 W, S.B.M. AND Exp. 3/31/08 ,a ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA ew '~O0 i1l,~ CIVIL ate! RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Scale 1" = 1,000' TF OF CALL- OFCALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX•X SHEET 8 OF 10 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X 6a3~ g P pGEs C/L CAMINO GAZAPO &0 /94028000'6 00 5918070008 W 2 2 2 3 I LIJ 918070008 2 7 2 6 1 W = 1 2 U) I 918050009 I 918080001 1 W R.S. 56/39-41 i Lv Lid I 1111 C/O V) I t I I I I I 1 918050004 1 SECTION 26 SECTION 27 i T. 8S, R. 3W T.8S,1 R.3W L - - - - - - - - 918050005 918080006 918050002 I 1 I I 1 918050006 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD --DATE- REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o4pOFESS/Ok'` EXPIRES: 3-31-08 C0 440 ~yc+ ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA _y m SPHERE OF INFLUENCE co in BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 W No. 26159 AND SECTIONS 33- 36. T. 8 S. R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND Cie A * Exp. 3/31/08 * ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA C(y1i RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE Sc016 1" = 1,000' ~lF OF CAi1F0~~ OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 9 OF I EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X COURSE SHEET BEARING DELTA DISTANCE LENG RADIU RECORD DATA PER COUNTY OF RECORD 1 N 7,T40'46" E 282.62 2 S 39-48'32* E 1694.79 RS 56 39-41 RIVERSIDE 3 S 00'00 00 W 2731.93 RS 56/39-41 RIVERSIDE 4 S 00' 19 01 E 2654.01 YS 0(702 43 W 2697.75 6 S 00-24'22" W 2658.14 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE TS 00'23 04 W 2646.09 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 8 N 88'55 36 W 2659.40 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 9 N 89'5518 W 5259.28 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 10 N 89'59 23 W 2741.72 ROS 81532/1-26 SAN DIEGO 11 S 88'591 7 W 2721.55 ROS 8832/1-2F' SAN DIEGO 12S 89'4046 W 2707.45 ROS 8832 1-26 SAN DIEGO 13 N 89-27'23' W 2694.63 ROS 8832/1-26 SAN DIEGO 14 N 00'1635 E 2637.86 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 15 N 00'22 47 E 1331.69 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 16 S 89'50 20 E 2653.19 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 17 N 00'22 10 W 1313.47 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 18 N 89'26'32w W 2636.01 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 19 N 00'29 50 E 1344.23 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE TON 67'19'58" E 12997.33 RS 56139-41 RIVERSIDE 21 S 00'00 20 E 999.86 PM 29127-41 RIVERSIDE 22 N 51'51 46 E 815.78 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 23 1925'39" 564.18 3100 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 24 N 41"26'07- E 333.94 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 25 S 06'17 41 E 37.87 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 26 S 45'00 21 E 86.00 PM 29/27-41 MIME 27 N 87-1444 E 1138.19 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 28 N 60'47 31 E 835.90 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 29 N 76'29 23 E 457.79 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 30 N 07-27 46 E 918.42 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 31 W-2 8 00 57 W 466.70 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 32 15!00'28m 157.18 600 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 33 N 46!58'35- E 714.57 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 34 2542 11 279.63 600 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 35 N 73 40 '46E 1016.47 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECIONS 23 - 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. )(X-XX-X SHEET 10 OF 10 DRAFT EXHIBIT E CC RESOLUTION - LAFCO APPLICATION DRAFT RESOLUTION NO. 08- A RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION TO TAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AS THE SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION COMPRISED OF APPROXIMATELY 4,997 ACRES, LOCATED IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE PRE-EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE 15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (PA07- 0225) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On January 23, 2007, the City of Temecula City Council approved a motion during Council Business of the City Council Agenda to direct staff to initiate a feasibility study of a proposed sphere of influence expansion and proposed Annexation of approximately 4600 acres westerly of Interstate 15 southerly of the Santa Margarita River and northerly of the San Diego County (the "Santa Margarita Area Annexation"). B. On August 1, 2007, the City of Temecula initiated Planning Application No. PA07-0225 (a General Plan and Change of Zone Amendment) and Planning Application No. PA07-0226 (a Sphere of Influence Expansion and Annexation) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code which applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County and Riverside County boundary (collectively, the "Project'). A legal description of the proposed sphere of influence expansion and proposed Santa Margarita Area Annexation is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. C. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from September 22, 2008 through November 5, 2008 for a 45-day public review. D. On [INSERT DATE], the City gave notice to LAFCO that the Planning Commission would be considering the proposed Annexation on [INSERT DATE], and that DRAFT the City Council would hold a hearing to consider the proposed Annexation on a subsequent date. E. On [INSERT DATE], the City gave notice to LAFCO that the Planning Commission would be considering recommendation to the City Council of adoption of this proposed Resolution of Application to LAFCO requesting that it take proceedings for the Santa Margarita Annexation as described above and in the legal description referenced above. This notice was provided to LAFCO twenty (20) days prior to the hearing as required by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 pursuant to Government Code Section 56654. F. The Planning Commission, considered the Draft EIR for the Project at a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2008, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify concerning the Draft EIR and the proposed Project. G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project and the Draft EIR, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- - recommending that the City Council certify a Final EIR for the Project dated September 22, 2008, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. H. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record of information received at the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 08- recommending that the City Council (1) approve a Resolution amending the General Plan Land Use Element to incorporate Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space (OS) as the General Plan Land Use Designations within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation; (2) approve a Pre-Zoning Ordinance for the pre-zoning of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation; and (3) approve a Zoning Ordinance Amendment amending Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code and amending the official zoning map of the City of Temecula by adopting zoning designations Hillside Residential-Santa Margarita (HR- SM) and Conservation District-Santa Margarita (OS-C-SM) and adopting Hillside Development Standards. 1. On [INSERT DATE], the City gave notice to LAFCO that the City Council would be considering the adoption of this proposed Resolution of Application to LAFCO requesting that it take proceedings for the Santa Margarita Annexation as described above and in the legal description referenced above. This notice was provided to LAFCO twenty (20) days prior to the hearing as required by the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 pursuant to Government Code Section 56654. J. On [INSERT DATE] the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposed Project and the proposed Final EIR, at which time all persons interested in the proposed Final EIR, proposed General Plan Amendment, Pre-Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Amendment, as well as the proposed DRAFT Resolution of Application to LAFCO for the proposed Sphere of Influence Expansion and proposed Annexation, had the opportunity to comment on and testify about the proposed Final EIR and proposed Project. After considering all the testimony and comments and the entire record concerning the Project and the proposed Final EIR, the City Council certified the Final EIR prepared for the Project, adopted Findings pursuant to the CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to CEQA. K. At this same hearing, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the proposed General Plan Amendment, Pre-Zoning Ordinance, and Zoning Code Amendment, and all the comments and testimony thereon and the entire record concerning the Project, and the City Council adopted Resolution No. _adopting the General Plan Amendment and gave the first reading of the Pre-Zoning Ordinance No. _ and Zoning Code Amendment Ordinance No. L. On [INSERT DATE], the City Council for the City of Temecula considered a proposed Sphere of Influence expansion and adopted a Resolution requesting LAFCO begin proceedings to consider expansion of the City's sphere of influence to include the territory described above. M. The proposed Santa Margarita Annexation to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District is uninhabited, and a description of the boundaries of the territory is as set forth above. [AWAITING CONFIRMATION FROM CITY REGARDING UNINHABITED, INHABITED] N. This proposal is consistent with the sphere of influence expansion requested in Resolution No. adopted by the City on [INSERT DATE] as noted above. 0. The City of Temecula has adopted a Pre-Zoning Ordinance for the Annexation Area, a copy of which will be filed concurrently with this Resolution and the City's application material, and prepared a plan for providing services to the Annexation Area, a copy of which will be filed with LAFCO with this Resolution and the City's application materials. P. The reasons for the proposed annexation of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve and Surrounding Areas to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District are as follows: (1) To place the entire Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, within the City's jurisdiction so that one public agency, the City, is responsible for the protection of the Reserve; (2) To protect and preserve the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve as Open Space and an educational resource and protect and preserve the Santa Margarita River; DRAFT (3) To protect the biological resources located within the Annexation Area in which 181 animal species and an additional 331 plant species have been documented and observed within the SMER, including 20 sensitive species identified by the Department of Fish and Game as occurring within or in proximity to the proposed Annexation Area. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby requests the Local Agency Formation Commission to take all proceedings necessary for the annexation of certain territory described herein as the Santa Margarita Area Annexation to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District as described in Exhibit A to this Resolution and directs the City Manager to file this Resolution and all necessary application documents with LAFCO. DRAFT PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of Michael S. Naggar, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk DRAFT EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF SANTA MARGARITA ECOLOGICAL RESERVE ANNEXATION AREA EXHIBIT ^A' AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA ) (AMENDED.. LAFCO NO. )(X-XX-X LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 THROUGH 28 INCLUSIVE AND SECTIONS 33 THROUGH 36 INCLUSIVE, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN AND ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF VIA GORRION AND CAMINO ESTRIBO AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP NO. 6835, ON FILE IN BOOK 29, PAGES 27 THROUGH 41 INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 73' 40' 46" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CAMINO 0 ESTRIBO, A DISTANCE OF 387.96 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3000.00 FEET; O THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE EASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF OF 03' 21", AN ARC LENGTH OF 421.80 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 81' 44' 07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 499.39 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET; ® THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34' 39' 10", AN ARC LENGTH OF 120.96 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 47' 04' 57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF (5 329.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTHERLY THROUGH A © CENTRAL ANGLE OF 56' 40' 03", AN ARC LENGTH OF 197.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 09' 35' 06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF Q 153.94 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE SOUTH 49' 08' 24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 716.40 FEET ALONG SAID ® EASTERLY BOUNDARY TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835 AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE; PAGE 1 OF 6 THENCE SOUTH 50' 06' 05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1696.11 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID MAP, ALSO BEING THE CITY OF TEMECULA ® BOUNDARY LINE, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF TEMECULA RANCHO AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 56 PAGES 39 TO 41 INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 39' 48' 32" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 4514.27 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE 10 WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 15 AS SHOWN BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENTATION MAP NO. 436591 THROUGH 436595 INCLUSIVE ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF SAID COUNTY IN BOOK 204 PAGES 710 THROUGH 714 INCLUSIVE; THENCE SOUTH 00' 28' 33" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 11 OF 680.30 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 07' 15' 21" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 12 OF 230.22 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 15' 37' 52" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 570.32 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY 13 AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1700.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 82' 44' 00" WEST; 14 THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE SOUTHERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18' 12' 22", AN ARC LENGTH OF 540.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 79' 03' 38' WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE 15 EASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1800.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 79' 03' 38" WEST; 16 THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE, ALSO BEING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTHERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 03' 55' 38", AN ARC LENGTH OF 123.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14' 52' 00" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 17 OF 421.96 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04' 14' 48" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 18 OF 623.94 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00' 46' 48" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 19 OF 895.70 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 07' 36' 10" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 847.81 FEET; PAGE 2 OF 6 THENCE SOUTH 15' 38' 32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 580.13 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE 15 AS SHOWN BY CALIFORNIA 2~1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MONUMENTATION MAP ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY SURVEYOR OF SAID COUNTY IN BOOK 205 PAGES 134 THROUGH 144 INCLUSIVE; © THENCE SOUTH 15' 55' 50" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 869.08 FEET; 23 THENCE SOUTH 71' 29' 54" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 158.64 FEET; ® THENCE SOUTH 16' 04' 34" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 827.48 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20' 27' 36" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 25 OF 1009.31 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49' 15' 12" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE © OF 743.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 17' 33' 26" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 27 OF 614.79 FEET; n THENCE SOUTH 02' 24' 49" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE EJ OF 352.02 FEET; ® THENCE SOUTH 36' 58' 02" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 925.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63' 37' 47" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE 30 OF 185.44 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 00' 23' 04" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER SECTION LINE OF 31 SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 132.29 FEET TO SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 36, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; 32 THENCE NORTH 88' 55' 36" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2403.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 89' 55' 18" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 5259.28 FEET TO THE 33 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 35 AS SHOWN ON A RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN PAGE 8832 OF RECORD OF SURVEY MAPS, RECORDS OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89' 59' 23" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND THE 34 SOUTHERLY.LINE OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF 2741.72 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; PAGE 3 OF 6 THENCE SOUTH 88' 59' 17" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SAID 35 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 34, A DISTANCE OF 2721.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE SOUTH 89' 40' 46" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND THE 36 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2707.45 FEET TO THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 89' 27' 23" WEST ALONG SAID TOWNSHIP LINE AND SAID 3~7 SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2694.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 00' 16' 35" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 38 33, A DISTANCE OF 2637.86 FEET TO THE WEST 1/4 CORNER THEREOF, AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 10, PAGE 22, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 00' 22' 47" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 39 1331.69 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTH 89' 50' 20" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2653.19 40 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH 00' 22' 10" WEST ALONG THE CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID 41 SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 1313.47 FEET TO THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 89' 26' 32" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID 42 SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 2636.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 00' 29' 50 EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SECTION 28, 43 A DISTANCE OF 1344.23 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SANTA ROSA RANCHO AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 56 PAGE 39 THROUGH 41, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 67' 19' 58" EAST ALONG SAID SANTA ROSA RANCHO BOUNDARY ® LINE, A DISTANCE OF 12997.33 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 92 PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE SOUTH 00' DO' 20" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 999.86 FEET TO THE 45 SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT EASEMENT PER INSTRUMENT NO. 109720 RECORDED 12-13-1967, ALSO SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 51' 51' 46 EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EASEMENT LINE, A 46 DISTANCE OF 815.78 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3100.00 FEET; PAGE 4 OF 6 47 THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID EASEMENT NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10' 25' 39", AN ARC LENGTH OF 564.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41' 26' 07" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY EASEMENT LINE, A 48 DISTANCE OF 333.94 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO GAZAPO AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; 49 THENCE SOUTH 06' 17' 41" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 37.87 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS THEREOF; 50 THENCE SOUTH 45' 00' 21" EAST,.A DISTANCE OF 86.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; 51 THENCE NORTH 87' 14' 44" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1138.19 FEET; 52 THENCE NORTH 60' 47' 31" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 835.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 76 29' 23" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE, A 53 DISTANCE OF 457.79 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 97 PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 07' 27' 46" EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 97, ® A DISTANCE OF 918.42 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO POTRO PER SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 6835; THENCE NORTH 28' 00' 57" WEST 466.70 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ESTRIBO, SAID INTERSECTION 55 BEING ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 28- 00' 57" WEST; 56 THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15' 00' 28", AN ARC LENGTH OF 157.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 46' 58' 35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 714.57 FEET ALONG SAID 5© CENTERLINE TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 600.00 FEET; 58 THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE AND SAID CENTERLINE NORTHEASTERLY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 26' 42' 11", AN ARC LENGTH OF 279.63 FEET; 59 THENCE NORTH 73' 40' 46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1016.47 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. AREA = 5,015 ACRES, MORE OR LESS SEE ENCLOSED EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 5 OF 6 PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION QRof ESS/oy e co 44 N Z V a Na 26158 ~ ,a Eta. 3/31/06 KEVIN B. COZAD DATE mj CIVIL REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 4pe. cl01 O~a EXPIRES: 3-31-08 PAGE 6 OF 6 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED. LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X VICINITY AND SHEET INDEX MAP l ~ I LEGEND ANNEXATION BOUNDARY o Y tEME~U EXISTING CITY BOUNDARY F L^ 5,015 ACRES MORE OR LESS 'll Sl 918001002 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. ` INDICATES EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA BOUNDARY F SHEET2 \ S E 3 ~ I- SHEET 10 ANNEXATION BOUNDARY rSHEET9 - ~ ~SH ~IY~tE SIDE _ _ SAN DIEGO COUNTY COUNTY I I VICINITY MAP ~ ~SHEET6 ~.mo o 110-1 ~ I Scale 1• = 12,000' II SHEETS ~SHEET7-IT 6~ SHEET INDEX MAP xaoo Scale 1" = 6,000' Q.OfESSm- C01 40 Fyn ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y = W Na 26188 m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - oc 3~1~Ofl At 28 AND SECTIONS 33 •36, T. 8 S, M 3 W. S.B.M. AND 1r EV. it ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA CIVIL RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN 1lE OF CALIF~P THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY KEVIN B. COZAD DATE OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 EXPIRES: 3-31-08 LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 1 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X h~ y & 6 6U~J C/L VIA GORRION \\O O 3O 4 C/L CAMINO ESTRIBO P 0 B. 1 2 940250006 P~` CJ ® 1\ 940250002 Q C.~ o \ 940260004 C/L CAMINO ESTRIBO EXISTING CITY O \ OF TEMECULA - J 940260002 94026o005 - BOUNDARY 5 r----- C/L CAMINO POTRO 'CY 9-671-°"_~ 940250003 1 g~N% YY \ j R.S. 5639-4 W 94026000 W RdSj ® PM 10814 P.M.B. 78 i W cf) oI~jLO 918070014 PAGES 5-8-~ _ IW 1-------- - SECTION 24 un i T.8S, R.3W i 418070019 W I 918070011 918070018 I 918070012 I I I 1940280006 , 23 24 I I ' ~j-978080002. 1418080003 26 25 418080010 j 918080011 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQRoFESEXPIRES: 3-31-08 fig. CoI~~ ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA N z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - W No. 28159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND K Exp. 3/31/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA {r RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN em a m Ion i C1Vtt. THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale t` = 1,000' Tf of at. LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 2 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA ) (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 2 R.S. 56/39-41 O I F EXISTING CITY OF TEMECULA j PM 10814 BOUNDARY P.M.B. 78 i Q o PAGES 5-8 918070014 w Q L.Li SECTION 24 N T.8S, R.3W C~ In O w 918070019 O 918070018 N i 000 I D U 11 ~y0 ~ I I 918080008 1 I 918080010 j 918080011 j SECTION 25 1 1 918080009 N82'44'DD"w T.8S, R.3W ® cR} I I i SEE SHEET 4 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DA REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 OQpOFESS/ONE` EXPIRES: 3-31-08 h~QQ ~0, CC 40 ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - m No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, L 8 S, R.3 W. S.B.M. AND a Exp 3/31/08 x+ ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA {t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO. SITUATED IN ooo~ + oo S~, CIV THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY 1"1~17°~- 'gyp OQ~ OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1' = 1,000' f OF cAL 1f LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 3 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 3 SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE 918080009 0S 38"W 1 579• (R) ~ I I L------- © CO I I Q ~ Q' SECTION 25 ® ~o T.8S, R.3W z N 14J / EXISTING CITY slsaaoolo ' 918080011 ® ~--i OF TEMECULA i I-: N BOUNDARY I CJ ~ 0 ] q' C) ® U W Q tx~' j 91809000 918100001 1 818100008 1 ~P 1 r----1-----r---~ trj +.n 1 1918090008 1 918100002 1 918100007 1 Q t ^ 1918090006 I- - - .4- - - - -I- - -I 918100012 I 1 918090009 1918100003 1 918100006 1 I L--- L 1 ---J \y 918090010 1918100004 1 918100005 1 O ~Q 918090013 I 1 918090014SECTION 3 ® O _ I 1916nao26 G U ~O 918090017 9----]T 09001] .8S, R.3W 918090021 1 918090022 918110001 1 918110002 I SEE SHEET 5 KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQgOFESSION~! EXPIRES: 3-31-08 CDI~o eANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA h ~ m BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - No. 26159 rn 28 AND SECTIONS 33 -36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND Exp. 3/31 joB ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA i7 {t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN °0° m r'0W ~'1W `Pl C1V i1. THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY !jf OF \fO~a OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1` = 1,000' CAI. LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 4 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 1 SEE SHEET 11 FOFORLCOURSE TABLE SEE SHEET 4 26 25 918080010 1 918080011 - 35 1 36 1 918090002 1 19180900001 1 9 0180000081 I-----i t---- 1----t----I 1918090003 1 1918090008 1918100002 1 918100007 1 1918090001 ----1 918090006 1----.+---4------4 918100012 1918090004 1 1 918090009 1918100003 1 918100006 1 L---J L--- I----1--- i 19180900051 1918090010 1918100D04 1 9181000051 918060007 I I 1 1 - I--- 1--- (.D 918090011 1918090012 1918090013 1 918090014 1 1 1918110028 ---T----1-----1-----1 1 1 918090015 1 918090016 1918090017 1 918090DIB ( 1 I Ci- W ---t----I----t----I I I Q 1918090020 1918090021 1 9180900221 918110001 1 918110002 1 W 19 18090019 1-----I----h---4 1 1 40 1 918090023 1918090024 1 918090025 1 1 1 ® O ----I------------1 L OZ c' ~ I I I I 918090026 1918090027 1918090028 1 916090029 1 ~'i LL1 ----+----1----+----I 916120044 ~`ov I I 1 I O 18090030191809OD31 1918090032 1 918090033 1 ® Q V ~a 918060018 1---- U~• 918090034 1918090035 1 918090036 1 918090037 1 918130043 1 I I I / 918090038 I 1 1 I {918090039 1918090040 1918090042 I- 918130031 35 36 1 1 1918090043 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ® ® 3 S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 SAN DIEGO COUNTY KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQROFESS10EXPIRES: 3-31-08 't8. COj,40 e-1 ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - W No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 •36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND Of Exp. 3131/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA {r ~t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN X0 o m I , Sr CIVIL 'e THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1" = 1,000' Tf OF chL% LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 5 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED .............j LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X I I 918060008 1 I I I 1 918090026 1 918060019 1 918060013 1- - - - - - - - -I 1 SECTIiON 35 1 918060DO9 1 I T.8S,i R.3IN 1 i 1918090030 918060014 - 918060018 t---- 1 918060021 1 918060010 1 1 j - - - - - - ( 918090034 918060022 91$060015 RAINBOW GLEN IRD. 4 1 918060023 1 9180900381 Lo 34 35 I 1 918060011 1 1 W RIVERSIDE 918060024 1 COUNTY 1 35 36 I w Ld ® S 1/4 ® y® LLj SEC 35 (n S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 U) III SAN DIEGO COUNTY W Cn U) SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. CO D D TE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQpDFESS,ON EXPIRES: 3-31-08 GO 4,9 Fyc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - W No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.8.M. AND Exp. 3/31/08 Zo ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA {t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN ~0 am I lp C/V THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY 8 OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1" = 1,000 lF OF CAt.tF ~ LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 6 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED ) LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X 918060002 Jl- -918060003 - I I/ L - I( 918060019 918060001 v I I I I SECTION 34 T.8S, R.3W I I I I 00 Co 918060017 1 j 918060015 ~ 33 34 S 1/4 34 35 1-- w -I RIVERSIDE i SEC 34~ COUNTY ! Lw S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 W SAN DIEGO COUNTY W cn to SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DAT REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQpGFESSTOy EXPIRES: 3-31-08 *g. CUI~~ ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA =A Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - W N0. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND Exp. 3/31/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA * RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN D0° ° ® -''0D rl,, Ct411 0~~! THE UNINCORPORATED OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF COUNTY CALIFORNIA Scale 1" = 1,000' F DP CALIF F 12 LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 7 0 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA j (AMENDED. LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SEE SHEET 9 ® I 918040003 + I I! C-N 1/16 I L--------~ N 1/16 SEC 33 1 SEC 33 918040004 r. ® R.S. 10/22 SECTION 33 I I- T. 8S, R. 3W W SEC1 33 I 1 I 1 i Lj I W I Cn I 1 i L-----.- 1 ( 918040012 1 918040011 918060017 I S 1/4 I 32 33 33 34 RIVERSIDE SEC 33 , COUNTY S.D.CO. R.O.S. 8832 SAN DIEGO COUNTY SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 OQ~OFESS/D EXPIRES: 3-31-08 CO 440 Fyn ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA co z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - No. 26159 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND W m c E>tp 3/159 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA ~fm {y {r RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN dw -1 `Pl CIVIL THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY 4. OQ~~ OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1' = 1,000 P OF CALVE LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 8 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED ) LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X P Fz~~CNg FZ OS 6 5~~~ Rs I P R.S. 56/39-41 SECTION 28 O T. 8S, R. 3W 918050002 w l 918050001 V) 22,99 28 N 1/4 28 27 Li SEC 33 32 r33 ® ; 33 34 l R. S. 10/22 41 918040004 1 918040003 ( 918060001 LS 1/16 EC 33 ® C-N 1/16 1 SEC 33 SEE SHEET 8 SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o QaDFESSipN~` EXPIRES: 3-31-08 ~~Q~c fig. C0r1Q ~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA = BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - w No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 36, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND Exp. 3/31/08 A ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA {r {r RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN mo o eao t~cn S,l C1V11. THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY ~rE Of CA1OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Scale 1 ` = 1,000' LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 9 OF 12 EXHIBIT"A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X 6a~~ g P Pp~S C/L CAMINO GAZAPO 0) P Rp,~ ~9~~1 I 918070008 P~~ P<O R g S. ® 2 2 2 3 940280006 ~ W S Q``\ 918070008) 27 26 - Li '-1 w = I = U I 918050009 I 918080001 i (n LLI R.S. 56/39-41 i W W I ----------------I- Li I I I 916050004 i SECTION 26 SECTIION 27 i T. 8S, R. 3W T.8S,1 R.3W L 918050005 918060006 916050002 I i I ( 918050006 I SEE SHEET 1 FOR LEGEND SEE SHEET 11 FOR COURSE TABLE KEVIN B. CO D DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQROFESS/oN EXPIRES: 3-31-08 I6• Co .410 Fyc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33 - 38, T. 8 S, R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND cc Exp. 3/31/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA y} {t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY ao +.ooo +.mo ,,pr1 CIVIL a\! THE UNINCORPORATED OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OFF CALIFORNIA Scale 1` = 1,000' lF OF' CAL1F LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 10 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X COURSE SHEET BEARING DELTADISTANCE LENGTH RADIO RECORD DATA PER COUNTY OF RECORD 1 N 73'40 46 E 387196 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 2 08'03 21 421.80 3000 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 3 N 81'4407 E 499.39 PM 29/27- 1 RIVERSIDE 4 34'3910 120.96 200 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 5 N 4704'57- E 329.51 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 6 56'40 03 197.81 200 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 7 N 09-35-06- W 153.94 PM 29127-41 RIVERSIDE 8 S 49'08'24E 716.40 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 9 S 50'06 05 W 1696.11 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 10S 39-48'32- E 4514.27 RS 56/39-41 RIVERSIDE 11S 00`28'33" W 680.30 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 12S 0715 21 E 230.22 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 13S 1537 52 E 570.32 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 14 18 12 22 540.19 1700 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 15S 7903 38 W 100.00 204/710-71 4 RIVERSIDE 16 03'55 38 123.38 1800 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 17S 1,V52'00- E 421.96 204 10-714 RIVERSIDE IBIS 04'1448 E 623.94 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 19S 00`46'48" W 895.70 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 20S 0736'10" W 847.81 204/710-714 RIVERSIDE 21S 15'3W32- W 580.13 205/134- 44 RIVERSIDE 22S 15!55'50* W 869.08 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 23 S 71'29 54 W 158.64 205/134-11+4 RIVERSIDE 24S 16'04 34 W 827.48 205 134-144 RIVERSIDE 25S 20'27 36 W 1009.31 205 134-144 RIVERSIDE 26S 49'15'12' W 743.87 205 134-144 RIVERSIDE 27S 1733'26W 614.79 205 134-144 R DE 28S OT24 49 W 35202 205 134-144 RIVERSIDE 29S 36'58 02 W 925.56 20541-34-144 RIVERSIDE 30 S 6337 47 W 185.44 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE KEVIN . COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 o Q~OPESS/pN~` EXPIRES: 3-31-08 fig, Co21~ ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23 - w NO. 26159 28 AND SECTIONS 33.36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W. S.B.M. AND Exp. 3~31~08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA 1} RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN PT CIVIL THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY 7p - OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA f OF CAL14 LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 11 OF 12 EXHIBIT "A" AMENDMENT TO THE INCORPORATION OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA, TEMECULA, AND MURRIETA (AMENDED .......................j LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X COURSE SHEET BEARING DELI OISTANC LENG RADIO RECORD DATA PER COUNTY OF RECORD 31 S 00'23'04- W 132.29 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 32 N 88'55 36 W 2403.10 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 33 N 89'55 18 W 5259.28 205/134-144 RIVERSIDE 34 N 89'59 23 W 2741.72 ROS 8832/1-26 SAN DIEGO 35 S 88'59'17N W 2721.55 ROS 8832/1-26 SAN DIEGO 36- 89'4046 W 2707.45 ROS 8832 1-26 SAN DIEGO 37 N 89'27 23 W 2694.63 ROS 8832 1-26 SAN DIEGO 38N 00'1635 E 2637.86 RS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 39 N 00'22 47 E 1331.69 RS 10 22 RIVERSIDE 40 S 89'50 20 E 2653.19 RS 10 22 RIVERSIDE 41 N 0722"10* W 1313.47 RS 10 22 RIVERSIDE 42 N 89'26'32' W 2636.01 IRS 10/22 RIVERSIDE 43 N 00`29'50 E 1344.23 N 67"19'58' E 12997.33 RS 56/39-41 RIVERSIDE 44 45 S 00'00 20 E 999.86 PM 29/27-4 1 RIVERSIDE 4fi N 51'51 46 E 815.78' 1 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 47 10`25'39' 564.18 3100 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 48 N 41-26'07" E 333.94 PM 29127-41 RIVERSIDE 49S 06717'41 E 37.87 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 50 S 45'00 21 E 86.00 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 51 N 8714 44 E 1138.19 PM 29/27-41 RIVERSIDE 52 N W4731 E 835.90 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 53 N 76 29 23 E 457.79 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 54 N 0727 46 E 918.42 PM 29 27-41 RNTMIDE 55 N 28'00 57 W 466.70 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 56 15'00 28 157.16 600 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 57 N 46 58 35 E 714.57 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 58 26'4211 279.63 600 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE 591N 73-40-46- E 1016.47 PM 29 27-41 RIVERSIDE KEVIN B. COZAD DATE REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 26159 oQgOFESS/pN~! EXPIRES: 3-31-08 ~tv~4 4 e CO 40 `~yc ANNEXATION TO CITY OF TEMECULA y Z BEING A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 23- w No. 26159 m 28 AND SECTIONS 33.36, T. 8 S. R. 3 W, S.B.M. AND C Exp 3/31/08 ALSO LYING WITHIN A PORTION OF THE SANTA ROSA YZ' t<t RANCHO AND THE TEMECULA RANCHO, SITUATED IN `rl CIVIL \N. THE UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY OF THE COUNTY 4,1. OF CALTFO~~ OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LAFCO NO. XX-XX-X SHEET 12 OF 12