HomeMy WebLinkAbout021009 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title 11]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
FEBRUARY 10, 2009 7:00 PM
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
5:30 P.M. Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code
Section:
1) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Sections
54956.9(a) and (c). The Council will meet pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(b) with respect to one matter of potential litigation in which
the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there
is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City based on existing
facts and circumstances and pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(c) with respect to the same matter in which the City Council will
decide whether to initiate litigation.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various
parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City
Clerk.
1
Next in Order:
Ordinance: 09 -02
Resolution: 09 -14
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards
Prelude Music: Earlene Bundy
Invocation: Reverend Jonathan Maxey of Grace Chapel of Temecula Valley
Flag Salute: Eagle Scouts Troop No. 337
ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards
PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS
Certificates of Achievement for attaining the rank of Eagle Scout
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak"
form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is
a five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at
this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for
separate action.
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1 .1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the action minutes of January 27, 2009.
3 List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
2
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2008
RECOMM EN DATON:
4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2008.
5 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Application Proposals for Fiscal Year 2009-
10
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Finance Committee
funding recommendations for fiscal year 2009 -10;
5.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub Recipient Agreements for 2009 -10
funding recipients and reprogram CDBG funds in accordance with the budget
resolution for general administration of the fiscal year 2009 -10 Community
Development Block Grant Funds;
5.3 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for the
Use of Community Block Grant Funds, dated November 15, 2006.
6 Support of the Plans for the Construction of a New Riverside County Regional Detention
Center (at the Request of Council Member Roberts)
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN
SUPPORT OF PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RIVERSIDE
COUNTY REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER
7 Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City- Maintained System within Tract Map No.
29639 -2 portions of Ynez Road, Date Street, and Equity Drive (located southwest of the
intersection of Margarita Road and Date Street within the Harveston Subdivision)
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
3
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY- MAINTAINED
SYSTEM PORTIONS OF YNEZ ROAD, DATE STREET, AND EQUITY DRIVE
(WITHIN TRACT NO. 29639 -2)
8 Cost sharing Reimbursement for regional costs associated with the City's Municipal
Stormwater Permit FY 2008 -2009
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve payment to the Riverside County Flood Control District in the sum of
$163,768.34 as the City's portion of the cost sharing reimbursement pursuant to the
Implementation Agreement between the Santa Margarita Watershed Permittees
approved by the City Council in January 2005.
9 Quitclaim portion of Wolf Creek Trail Park (APN 962- 580 -090) from City of Temecula to
Wolf Creek Development, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL
NUMBER 962 -580 -090 TO WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND
RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES OVER SAID PROPERTY
10 Award a Construction Contract for Pavement Rehabilitation De Portola Road Project No.
PW06 -10
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Award a construction contract for Project No. PW06 -10, Pavement Rehabilitation
De Portola Road, to Hardy Harper, Inc. in the amount of $1,161,000 and authorize
the Mayor to execute the contract;
10.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders up to 30% of the contract
amount, or $348,300;
10.3 Make a finding that the De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project is exempt
from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees.
11 Establishment and Appointment of Ad -Hoc Subcommittee Summerhouse Senior Housing
Development (at the request of Council Member Washington)
RECOMMENDATION:
4
11 .1 Establish an ad -hoc subcommittee to assess the opportunities related to the
Summerhouse Senior Housing Development;
1 1 .2 Appoint Council Members Roberts and Washington to serve on this ad -hoc
subcommittee.
12 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 09 -01
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.22.160 THROUGH
17.22.178, INCLUSIVE, REVISING THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (PDO -6) TO REVISE THE USES ALLOWED
FOR PLANNING AREA C AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
PLANNING AREA C (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07 -0309)
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name for the record.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
13 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Approve the action minutes of January 27, 2009.
5
14 Agreement Between the Temecula Community Services District and Willdan Financial
Services for Assessment Engineering Services
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve the Agreement between the Temecula Community Service District and
Willdan Financial Services for Assessment Engineering Services in the amount of
$39,500.
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come
forward and state your name for the record.
RDA CONSENT CALENDAR
15 Action Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Approve the action minutes of January 27, 2009.
RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
RDA ADJOURNMENT
6
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s)
at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
16 Approval for levying an assessment for fiscal year 2009 -2010 in connection with the
Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District TVTBID)
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Conduct a public hearing to consider protests regarding the levy of an assessment
in conjunction with the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District;
16.2 Instruct the City Clerk to tabulate any written protests which might be received prior
to the close of the public hearing regarding the formation of the proposed District;
16.3 If the City Clerk reports that there is not a majority protest received regarding this
District, then adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 -10 IN CONNECTION
WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT
DISTRICT (TVTBID)
CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS
17 Sex Offender Ordinance (At the Request of Mayor Maryann Edwards)
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 09-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.60 "SEX OFFENDERS TO TITLE 9
"PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND WELFARE OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH LOCAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SEX
OFFENDERS
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
7
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council Regular, Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at 5:30 P.M., for a
Closed Session with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
The entire agenda packet (including staff reports) may be available for viewing at City Hall- 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula -and at the Temecula Library 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula during normal business hours. The
packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the City Council meeting after 4:00 PM. You may access the
packet on the City's website cityoftemecula.org which as well will be available the Friday before the City Council
meeting after 4:00 PM.
8
PRESENTATIONS
The City of Temecula
Certificate of Achievement
The City Council of the City of Temecula commends
the outstanding achievement of
Richard P. Aldersley
of Troop #337
We congratulate Richard for his achievement on receiving the rank of Eagle Scout. We are proud
to present Richard with this Award, and we wish him success in his future accomplishments.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this tenth day
of February, 2009.
1
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk
The City of Temecula
Certificate of Achievement
The City Council of the City of Temecula commends
the outstanding achievement of
Timothy Avery
of Troop #337
We congratulate Timothy for his achievement on receiving the rank of Eagle Scout. We are proud
to present Timothy with this Award, and we wish him success in his future accomplishments.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this tenth day
of February, 2009.
1
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk
The City of Temecula
Certificate of Achievement
The City Council of the City of Temecula commends
the outstanding achievement of
Chris Clark
of Troop #337
We congratulate Chris for his achievement on receiving the rank of Eagle Scout. We are proud to
present Chris with this Award, and we wish him success in his future accomplishments.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this tenth day
of February, 2009.
1
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk
The City of Temecula
Certificate of Achievement
The City Council of the City of Temecula commends
the outstanding achievement of:
Ian E. Shaw
of Troop #337
We congratulate Ian for his achievement on receiving the rank of Eagle Scout. We are proud to
present Ian with this Award, and we wish him success in his future accomplishments.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
affixed my hand and official seal this tenth day
of February, 2009.
II
1 1
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM NO. 1
ITEM NO. 2
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JANUARY 27, 2009 7:00 PM
6:30 P.M. Closed Session of the City Council /Redevelopment Agency pursuant
to Government Code Section:
1) Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8 regarding real property negotiations located at 28725
Pujol Street (APN 922 062 -010), generally located on the west side of Pujol,
north of First Street. The negotiating parties are the City of
Temecula /Redevelopment Agency and Antonio Muniz. Under negotiation
are the price and terms of payment of real property interests. The
City /Agency negotiators are Shawn Nelson, Bob Johnson, and John
Meyer.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various
parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City
Clerk.
The Closed Session of the City Council was opened at 6:00 PM. A quorum was
present. There was no one wishing to speak on the Closed Session items.
Therefore, the Council recessed to Closed Session in the Main Conference Room
to discuss the matters on the agenda.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: 09 -01
Resolution: 09 -05
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards
Prelude Music: Brianna Thomas and Candace Saunders of the Musicians Workshop
Invocation: Pastor Bob Branch of The Springs Community Church
Flag Salute: Council Member Washington
ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards
PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS
Certificates of Achievement to the Murrieta Valley Junior All American Football Broncos Junior
Pee -Wee Division
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Jane Laskin, Wildomar, representing the Musicians Workshop, addressed the Council.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure Approved Staff
Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
1 .1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in
the agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of December 16, 2008 Approved Staff Recommendation
(5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by
Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
2.2 Approve the action minutes of January 13, 2009 Approved Staff
Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it
was seconded by Council Member Roberts; Council Member Washington
abstained; and electronic vote reflected approval.
3 List of Demands Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member
Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
2
4 Approval of the FY 2009 -10 Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District
Advisory Board Annual Report and Declaration of Intention to Levy an Assessment Against
Lodging Businesses within the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District for
FY 2009 -10 Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member
Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and
electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE REPORT OF THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR FISCAL YEAR
2009 -10 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM
BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID)
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO LEVY AN ASSESSMENT AGAINST LODGING
BUSINESSES WITHIN THE TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 -10 AND FIXING
THE TIME AND PLACE OF A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON AND GIVING
NOTICE THEREOF
5 Consider adoption of a Resolution ordering the making of Amended Reassessments, and
ordering the public hearing, and directing actions with respect thereto Approved Staff
Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -08
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ORDERING THE MAKING OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT PURSUANT TO PART
10 OF DIVISION 10 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE AND
DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 03 -04 (JOHN WARNER ROAD)
3
5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PRELIMINARILY APPROVING AMENDED ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE
PUBLIC HEARING, AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 03 -04 (JOHN WARNER ROAD)
6 Resolution Designating the Locations for the Posting of City Documents Approved Staff
Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DESIGNATING LOCATIONS FOR POSTING OF DOCUMENTS
7 Records Destruction Approval Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council
Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member
Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the
City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy.
8 Cultural Resources Monitoring Agreement for the Old Town Infrastructure Project Parking
Structure; Project No. PW06 -07 Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council
Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member
Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize an additional $25,000 for payment of monitoring expenses related to the
Cultural Monitoring Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luseno Indians to
monitor excavation and grading activities for Project No. PVV06 -07.
4
9 Ninth Amendment to the Consulting Agreement with Moffatt Nichol Engineers for French
Valley Parkway Interstate -15 Over Crossing and Interchange Improvements Project No.
PW02 -11 Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero
made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote
reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve the Ninth Amendment to the consultant agreement with Moffatt Nichol
Engineers in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for additional services necessary to
complete the Project Report and Environmental Document for the French Valley
Parkway Interstate -15 Over Crossing and Interchange Improvements Project No.
PW02 -11.
10 2009 Workers' Compensation Coverage Annual Renewal Approved Staff
Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve the contract with the City's current workers' compensation provider,
Travelers Insurance Company, as the City's Employee Workers' Compensation
Insurance Carrier for 2009 for an estimated premium cost of $308,169, which
begins on February 1, 2009.
11 Old Town Police Department Storefront Lease Extension Approved Staff
Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
1 1 .1 Approve a one -year lease extension for the Police Department Old Town Storefront
property to include a monthly base rental rate of $2,120.70, a variable common area
maintenance (CAM), for a total amount of $34,000.
12 Adoption of Complimentary Ticket Policy Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0)
Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member
Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
5
13 Approval of Projects for Annual Federal Appropriation Requests FY 2010 Approved
Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it
was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -12
At 7:28 p.m., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Redevelopment Agency. At 7:38 p.m. the City Council resumed with regular business.
PUBLIC HEARING
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -11
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING A COMPLIMENTARY TICKET POLICY PURSUANT TO THE
REQUIREMENTS OF FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION
REGULATION 18944.1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING A LIST OF PROJECTS TO BE SENT TO FEDERAL LEGISLATORS
REQUESTING ANNUAL FEDERAL APPROPRIATIONS
18 A Zoning Amendment to add Planning Area C to the Rancho Pueblo Planned
Development Overlay (PDO -6) Planning Application PA07 -0309 Approved Staff
Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Roberts; Mayor Edwards abstained; and electronic
vote reflected approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
AMENDING TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 17.22.160 THROUGH
17.22.178, INCLUSIVE, REVISING THE RANCHO PUEBLO PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (PDO -6) TO REVISE THE USES ALLOWED
FOR PLANNING AREA C AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
PLANNING AREA C (PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA07 -0309
Staff provided supplemental material (of record) with regard to this item.
Mr. Jim Griffin, Temecula, addressed the City Council with regard to this item.
6
19 Vacation of the Existing Public Utility Easement Generally located between Second Street
and Third Streets and between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek Channel
(Warehouse at Creekside, LLC, Bill Dalton, Applicant) Approved Staff
Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was
seconded by Council Member Washington; Mayor Edwards abstained; and
electronic vote reflected approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -13
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT
GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN SECOND AND THIRD STREETS AND
BETWEEN OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND MURRIETA CREEK CHANNEL
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
20 Planning Department Monthly Report
21 City Council Travel /Conference Report December 2008
22 Public Works Department Monthly Report
23 Police Department Monthly Report
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
City Attorney Thorson advised that there was no action to report under the Brown Act, noting
that if the City were to reach agreement with the property owner, a Purchase and Sale
Agreement will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration in Open Session.
Additionally, Mr. Thorson noted that Agency Member Roberts did not participate in the Closed
Session discussion as he is a Board Member for Habitat for Humanity which owns the
neighboring property.
7
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:50 p.m. the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at
5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m. City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ATTEST:
Susan Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL
8
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ITEM NO. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: List of Demands
PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager
Jada Yonker, Accounting Specialist
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution
List of Demands
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
Mf
Paz,
(10L
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and
approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims
represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or
authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and
procedures.
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on
file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and
that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,256,475.75.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10th day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
01/15/2009 TOTAL CHECK RUN 1,089,037.46
01/22/2009 TOTAL CHECK RUN 695,625.57
01/22/2009 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 471,812.72
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 02/10/2009 COUNCIL MEETING: 2,256,475.75
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001 GENERAL FUND 404,543.18
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 526,275.84
165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 135,331.89
190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 281,344.33
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 70,157.34
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" LANDSCAPE /SLOPE 77,150.11
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,448.45
196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 9,987.99
197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,931.81
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 202,542.98
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP PROJECT 9,566.99
300 INSURANCE FUND 5,790.68
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 38,986.63
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 2,254.61
340 FACILITIES 7,943.69
477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 9,406.51
001 GENERAL FUND 312,954.70
165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 7,109.80
190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 99,593.40
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 141.35
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" LANDSCAPE /SLOPE 5,153.40
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,391.67
196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 1,458.70
197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 779.80
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP PROJECT 3,073.87
300 INSURANCE FUND 1,202.07
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 25,807.68
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 4,349.53
340 FACILITIES 8,796.75
1,784,663.03
471,812.72
TOTAL BY FUND: 2,256,475.75
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129258 01/15/2009 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS recreation supplies:Tiny Tot pgrm 216.88 216.88
129259 01/15/2009 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD instructor earnings 840.00 840.00
129260 01/15/2009 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano maint svcs: Theater 430.00 430.00
129261 01/15/2009 006915 ALLIE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT equip rental:Old Town event 12/12 1,791.21
equip rental:Old Town event 11/28 319.49 2,110.70
129262 01/15/2009 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS misc supplies: Aquatics pgrm 32.00 32.00
129263 01/15/2009 011236 AMERICAN TAITRADE INC skateboard build sets:Cultural Arts 904.19 904.19
129264 01/15/2009 004787 AMERIMARK DIRECT promo items:recycling awards 350.40 350.40
129265 01/15/2009 000101 APPLE ONE INC Temp Help Ppe 12/27: Ortiz, V 458.64
Temp Help Ppe 12/27: Stoner, J 520.07 978.71
129266 01/15/2009 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr svcs: Fld Op Ctr 149.36
Bottled wtr svcs: Maint Facility 125.16
Bottled wtr svcs: CRC 143.54
Bottled wtr svcs: TV Museum 22.33
Bottled wtr svcs: Skate Park 8.61
Bottled wtr svcs: Ch Museum 24.16
Bottled wtr svcs: TCC 17.71
Bottled wtr svcs: Theater 38.29
Bottled wtr svcs: Library 49.49
Bottled wtr svcs: CHS Aquatics 4.30
Bottled wtr svcs: Council 5.74
Bottled wtr svcs: TES Aquatics 6.45
Bottled wtr svcs: PBSP 18.32 613.46
129267 01/15/2009 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN Membership: 70939893 CR 47.00 47.00
CALIF
129268 01/15/2009 005946 AYERS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY misc supplies: Spring Egg Hunt 774.00 774.00
129269 01/15/2009 011438 BAKER, BLYTHE EDEN TCSD Instructor Earnings 325.00 325.00
Pagel
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129270 01/15/2009 004205 BALLET FOLKLORICO TCSD Instructor Earnings 122.50
TCSD Instructor Earnings 35.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 140.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 140.00 437.50
129271 01/15/2009 012423 BATTERY OUTLET INC battery supplies: PWTraffic 290.82 290.82
129272 01/15/2009 012651 BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TRAINING regist:lvstg Int /Intrg Tech 1/26 -30 944.00 944.00
129273 01/15/2009 010328 BEST IMPRESSIONS promo items: MPSC health fair 525.70 525.70
129274 01/15/2009 012287 BORDEAUX PRINTERS INC Theater brochure:mid season events 2,541.07 2,541.07
129275 01/15/2009 006908 C C COMPANY INC entertainment:High Hopes event 1/2 200.00
entertainment:Old Town holiday 1,500.00 1,700.00
129276 01/15/2009 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 247.50
PW patch truck materials 247.50
PW patch truck materials 166.18 661.18
129277 01/15/2009 000638 CALIF DEPT OF CONSERVATION 2008 4th Qtr pmt:Strong Motion 6,823.74 6,823.74
129278 01/15/2009 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY Helium tanks rental /refill:TCSD 42.96 42.96
129279 01/15/2009 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Jan copier lease: Stn 84 182.55 182.55
INC
129280 01/15/2009 008644 CANTRELL, ROGER, AIA, AICP Dec architectural svcs: Planning 2,081.00 2,081.00
129281 01/15/2009 000131 CARL WARREN COMPANY INC Nov Claim adjuster services 2,445.17 2,445.17
129282 01/15/2009 005708 CLEAR CHANNEL radio advertising:Old Town Holiday 1,340.00 1,340.00
BROADCASTING INC
129283 01/15/2009 005447 CLEMENTS, BRIAN reimb: ICC Certification Exp 3/12 80.00 80.00
129284 01/15/2009 008594 COMMUNITY BANK Escrow# 1202:AII American Asphalt 131,063.83 131,063.83
129285 01/15/2009 006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC Network Client Svcs: Info Sys 600.00 600.00
Page2
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor
129288 01/15/2009 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON
COMPANY INC
(Continued)
Description
129286 01/15/2009 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE misc supplies: Theater 74.37
129287 01/15/2009 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING HVAC HVAC svcs: Children's Museum 14,880.00
INC
misc plotter supplies: Info Sys
misc plotter supplies: Info Sys
129289 01/15/2009 003962 DAVID NEAULT ASSOCIATES INC Dec Idscp insp svcs:Pechanga Pkwy
129290 01/15/2009 008943 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES Admin Hearing fees:Byrne Grading
(DGS)
129291 01/15/2009 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Jan portable toilet svc:Rdhwk Pk 55.78
SRVCS
Jan portable toilet svc:Vail Rnch Pk
Jan portable toilet svc:Veterans Pk
Jan portable toilet svc:Lng Cyn Pk
Jan portable toilet svc:Riverton Pk
129292 01/15/2009 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISKMUB INT'L Dec special events premiums
129293 01/15/2009 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles: B &S 178.69
INC
Fuel for City vehicles: Code Enf
Fuel for City vehicles: TCSD
Fuel for City vehicles: PW Maint
Fuel for City vehicles: PW CIP
Fuel for City vehicles: PW Lnd Dv
Fuel for City vehicles: PW Traffic
129294 01/15/2009 004829 ELLISON WILSON ADVOCACY Jan State Lobbyist svcs: CM
LLC
129295 01/15/2009 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
ASSOC.
129296 01/15/2009 003747 FINE ARTS NETWORK
misc plotter supplies: Info Sys 489.42
Amount Paid Check Total
55.78
55.78
55.78
55.78
1,037.91
Page3
74.37
14,880.00
150.78
489.42 1,129.62
3,705.00 3,705.00
3,619.00 3,619.00
278.90
1,037.91
265.14
1,004.57
1,114.91
107.61
314.00
48.48 3,033.40
3,500.00 3,500.00
Nov EIR svcs: Tem Water Park 1,000.00
Oct EIR svcs: Tem Water Park 6,385.35 7,385.35
sttlmnt: Into the Woods 1/09 4,523.66 4,523.66
apChkLst
01/15/2009
Final Check List
8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date
Vendor
129297 01/15/2009 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
M C I CENTER
HILTON
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
MIMI'S CAFE
LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
BOB'S BIG BOY
LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES
LIGHT ENERGY STUDIO
PUBLIC HOUSE
PAYPAL
129298 01/15/2009 012369 FIT LIFE 1
129299 01/15/2009 007866 G C S SUPPLIES INC
129300 01/15/2009 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC
129301 01/15/2009 003946 G T ENTERTAINMENT
129302 01/15/2009 011351 GBA MASTER SERIES, INC.
129303 01/15/2009 012066 GEOCON INLAND EMPIRE INC
129304 01/15/2009 008361 GRAPE STOMPERS SQ DANCE
CLUB
129305 01/15/2009 005311 H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER
SPCL.
(Continued)
Description
RR reg:NLC Ann'I Cf:3/14 -18 WshDC
RR Parking Metrolink Mtg 12/2
RR htl:'08 SCAG Cf:12/4
JC reg:NLC Ann'I Cf: 3/14-18 WshDC
GY meal:emp mtg MH 12/9
GY Complex Leave Cf:10/21 PlmSprg
GYmeal:Union Mtg 12/10
GY credit:Complex Leave Cf 10/21
HP Infinity Mirror: Ch Museum
GR meal:Int Panel Asst Fin Director
GR Payflow Pro Transaction
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
toner cartridges: Info Sys
Dec rent osmosis washer: Stn 73
entertainment:Team PACE event
Add'I GBA Work Master Licenses:IS
Nov Geotech Svcs:Pechanga Pkwy
TCSD instructor earnings
TCSD instructor earnings
TCSD instructor earnings
Dec pool maint: CRC/TES pools
Amount Paid
430.00
11.00
126.00
430.00
13.18
114.21
34.02
107.21
125.64
61.00
59.95
336.00
420.00
513.97
25.86
100.00
7,240.80
13,405.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
Page: 4
Check Total
1,297.79
756.00
513.97
25.86
100.00
7,240.80
13,405.00
900.00 900.00
Page:4
21.00
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129306 01/15/2009 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: Theater 10.19
Hardware supplies: Maint Facility 2.47
Hardware supplies: TCSD Parks 508.63
Hardware supplies: City Hall 258.17
Hardware supplies: Info Sys 11.72
Hardware supplies: PW Traffic 566.76
Hardware supplies: PIN Maint 284.18 1,642.12
129307 01/15/2009 007371 HARVESTON, LLC refund 50 %:ping appl closed 1,100.50 1,100.50
129308 01/15/2009 012655 HICKMAN, MAYLEN refund:sec dep:TCC rental 150.00 150.00
129309 01/15/2009 005579 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY billing adj:May -Jun Inv cntrct apprvd 6,070.60 6,070.60
129310 01/15/2009 008662 INLAND VALLEY VICTORY refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
CHURCH
129311 01/15/2009 006381 JESUCRISTO ES LA, RESPUESTA refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
129312 01/15/2009 012656 KAZEMIER, BRANDIE refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
129313 01/15/2009 010088 LEA ASSOCIATES Oct appraisal svcs:Frnch Vly Pkwy 2,520.00 2,520.00
129314 01/15/2009 012654 LEWIS, JAMES refund:prkg cit:viol. dismissed 335.00 335.00
129315 01/15/2009 012657 LLOYD, MARGARET refund:etiquette sury parenting 25.00 25.00
129316 01/15/2009 012364 MASTERS, TRACY reimb: notebook cable 118.51 118.51
129317 01/15/2009 009606 MGT OF AMERICA INC Oct -Nov Financial Cnslt Svcs:Finance 2,771.00 2,771.00
129318 01/15/2009 007210 MIDORI GARDENS Dec landscape svcs: Parks 70,105.00 70,105.00
129319 01/15/2009 010103 MIRAN ENTERPRISES INC Res Imp Prgm: Petricka, Rachel 7,376.17 7,376.17
129320 01/15/2009 012623 MODEL T FORD CLUB OF SAN Lecture presentation:TV Museum 100.00 100.00
DIEGO
129321 01/15/2009 001214 MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTIONS, Parade Announcer: Old Town 1,440.33 1,440.33
LLC
PageS
apChkLst
01/15/2009
Final Check List
8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date
Vendor
129322 01/15/2009 001986 MUZAK- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Jan Music Broadcast:Old Town
129323 01/15/2009 012658 NELSON, CATHERINE
129324 01/15/2009 010504 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
129325 01/15/2009 009570 0 C B REPROGRAPHICS
129326 01/15/2009 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS
DIV
129327 01/15/2009 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE SERVICE
129328 01/15/2009 005656 PAP A
129329 01/15/2009 012659 PANNINGBATAN, EDITH
129330 01/15/2009 000472 PARADISE CHEVROLET
CADILLAC
129331 01/15/2009 002099 PASCOE MANAGEMENT LLP
129332 01/15/2009 011426 PDI FINANCIAL IMPREST
ACCOUNT
129333 01/15/2009 002498 PETRA GEOTECHNICAL INC
129334 01/15/2009 012660 PHAM, JOHNNY
129335 01/15/2009 012251 PORTRAIT PRODUCTIONS
129336 01/15/2009 000253 POSTMASTER
129337 01/15/2009 002185 POSTMASTER
129338 01/15/2009 011549 POWER SPORTS UNLIMITED
(Continued)
Description
refund:sec dep rental fee:CRC
Nov 26-Dec 25 cellular usage /equip
Dec reproduction srvcs:PW CIP Div
Misc office supplies:pd old town
Misc office supplies:pd mall
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Code Enf
City Vehicle Maint Svcs:Code Enf
Etiwanda Gardens sem:K.Harrington 2/5
refund:sec dep:MPSC rental
City veh repair maint: B &S Dept.
Jan '08 Restroom Rental:Old Town
refund:DIF credit:pujol st apts demo
Oct geotech srvcs:murr creek trails
refund:sec dep:CRC rental
TCSD Instructor Earnings
Express Mail Postal Svcs
deposit:postage due account
Police motorcycle repair maint srvcs
Amount Paid
69.11
397.00
1,824.21
1,422.87
29.06
106.44
742.78
152.75
175.00
70.00
150.00
473.51
826.00
526,275.84
940.00
150.00
441.00
55.25
50.00
784.96
Page: 6
Check Total
69.11
397.00
1,824.21
1,422.87
826.00
526,275.84
940.00
150.00
441.00
55.25
50.00
784.96
Page:6
135.50
1,070.53
70.00
150.00
473.51
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129339 01/15/2009 007771 PPSN CORPORATION refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
129340 01/15/2009 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY 6/16/09- 6/15/10 subscr:tcsd 3254007 165.36
INC
7/22/09 7/21/10 subscr:PW 6178628 165.36
3/14/09-3/13/10 subscr:C.CIrk 1633708 165.36
3/9/09- 3/8/10 subscr:C.Mgr Ofc 9298672 165.36
6/18/09 6/17/10 subscr:Fin. 6683902 165.36 826.80
129341 01/15/2009 004627 PUBLIC SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES Lidar batteries:Police 541.44
INC
Pro Laser Handle Repair Srvcs:Police 266.32
Pro Laser Trigger Switch Repair:Police 95.54 903.30
129342 01/15/2009 004529 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY- Dec Police motorcycle maint srvcs 3,683.86 3,683.86
DAVIDSON
129343 01/15/2009 002612 RADIO SHACK INC Hardware supplies:info sys 43.55
Hardware supplies:info sys 101.37 144.92
129344 01/15/2009 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 01 -04- 47210 -0 T.E.S. Pool 209.18
Various Water Meters 8,691.47
Various Water Meters:Fire 409.32
Various Water Meters:PW 673.91 9,983.88
129345 01/15/2009 002654 RANCHO FORD LINCOLN City vehicle maint: stn 84 34.71 34.71
MERCURY
129346 01/15/2009 000271 RBF CONSULTING Nov prof srvcs:O.T. Infrastructure 310.65 310.65
129347 01/15/2009 002907 REINHART FONTES ASSOCIATES Appraisal srvcs:Pujol Street 3,000.00 3,000.00
INC
129348 01/15/2009 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL Weed control:City owed lots 5,187.50
MANAGEMENT
Weed control:Citywide R-O-Ws 4,993.75 10,181.25
129349 01/15/2009 012288 RENT A CENTER #4086 Furniture Rental:Teen Dance 1/17/09 214.68 214.68
129350 01/15/2009 002110 RENTAL SERVICE equip rental: pw maint div 14.62 14.62
CORPORATION
129351 01/15/2009 010087 RIGGS RIGGS INC Appraisal srvcs:Diaz Rd /Dendy Pkwy 750.00 750.00
129352 01/15/2009 003698 RIVERSIDE CO ECONOMIC '09 MD &M Conf. /materials 2/9 -12/09 1,000.00 1,000.00
Page:7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor
(Continued)
Description
129353 01/15/2009 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT Holiday parade patrol srvcs 12/5/08
Winter Wonderland patrol srvcs 12/12/08
129356 01/15/2009 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW Public sign posting /pa08- 0176:PIn dpt
Public sign posting /pa07 -0307: Pin dpt
129357 01/15/2009 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING INC Nov Eng Srvcs:Main St Bridge
Amount Paid
8,555.92
191.60
Check Total
8,747.52
129354 01/15/2009 000815 ROWLEY, CATHY TCSD Instructor Earnings 392.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 448.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 252.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 756.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 441.00
TCSD Instructor Earnings 252.00 2,541.00
129355 01/15/2009 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS Dec security srvcs:Rdhwk Dog Prk 1,925.00
USA
Dec security srvcs:Harveston Lake 3,307.50 5,232.50
148.10
296.20 444.30
5,479.53 5,479.53
129358 01/15/2009 000645 SMART FINAL INC Misc supplies:theater 88.98 88.98
129359 01/15/2009 012182 SMUIN BALLETS SF Performance:theater 1/30 -31/09 12,000.00 12,000.00
129360 01/15/2009 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 2- 29-479 -2981 Temecula Pkwy 115.05
2- 29-974 -7899 Ynez Rd LS-3 58.95
2- 28-171 -2620 Police Mall Stn 378.24
2 -02- 351 -5281 CRC 3,681.74
2- 10- 331 -2153 TCC 706.98
2- 20-798 -3248 C. Museum 819.72
2- 30-066 -2889 Rancho Vista PED 18.65
Dec 2- 30-608 -9384 28582 harveston 413.15
2- 05-791 -8807 various mtrs 11,510.94
2 -01- 202 -7603 arterial st lights 25,681.61
2 -01- 202 -7330 various mtrs 70,046.87 113,431.90
129361 01/15/2009 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC 2009 mbrshp dues:5 tcsd staff 350.00 350.00
129362 01/15/2009 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL Jan pest control srvcs:fire stn 84 80.00 80.00
INC
129363 01/15/2009 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, Dec #9514910839:phoneusage 444.93 444.93
TELEPHONE COMPANY
129364 01/15/2009 005786 SPRINT Nov 26-Dec 25 cellular usage /equip 6,154.32 6,154.32
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129365 01/15/2009 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE Voluntary Supp Life Insurance Payment 689.60 689.60
COMPANY
129366 01/15/2009 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET carpet cleaning srvcs:crc 12/11/08 245.00
CLEANING
Carpet maint srvcs:city hall 12/19/08 475.00 720.00
129367 01/15/2009 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS Misc supplies:children's museum 7.42 7.42
129368 01/15/2009 011736 TEMECULA TROPHY INC nametags: M.Edwards /J.Comerchero 25.70
nameplate: M. McCracken 8.62
recogn plaque: F. Hogan 113.14
recognition plaques: D. Cregut 89.54 237.00
129369 01/15/2009 010046 TEMECULA VALLEY Nov '08 BID admin fees 811.56
CONVENTION
Nov '08 Bus. Impry District Asmnts 40,578.05 39,766.49
129370 01/15/2009 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith srvcs:var park sites/foc 207.36 207.36
CENTR
129371 01/15/2009 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY Emp Recognition: HR service pins 438.47 438.47
129372 01/15/2009 004308 TOWNE COUNTRY AUTO Auto towing srvcs:police 12/31/08 225.00 225.00
TOWING
129373 01/15/2009 010276 TW TELECOM Jan high speed internet fire stn 92 44.95
Jan high speed internet city hall 183.38 228.33
129374 01/15/2009 008517 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF 12/4 -31/08 Fence Rental:Main St Bridge 26.40 26.40
CA,INC
129375 01/15/2009 004261 VERIZON
xxx -7530 GIS Library
Jan xxx -4200 general usage
Jan xxx -1540 general usage
Jan xxx -6620 general usage
Jan xxx -5180 general usage
Jan xxx -8900 gen usage:library
Jan xxx- 0682:civic ctr camera
Jan xxx- 2372:wolf crk park irrig cntrl
Jan xxx -6812 general usage
xxx -7562 irrigation controller
xxx -1341 Theater
xxx -1941 PTA CD TTACSD
xxx-3910 1st St Irrigation
129376 01/15/2009 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 12/1 -15/08 tree trimming srvcs:citywide
414.71
933.62
87.94
32.50
36.55
740.71
91.58
33.73
87.80
35.64
418.20
67.73
36.72
1,010.00 1,010.00
Page9
3,017.43
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129377 01/15/2009 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL AB939/SB1016 wrkshp: BS /PR 2/18/09 30.00 30.00
OF
129378 01/15/2009 000348 ZIGLER, GAIL reimb:rfrshmnts/Commission mtg 1/12/09 90.81 90.81
Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA:
1,089,037.46
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11
01/15/2009 8:59:21AM CITY OF TEMECULA
121 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks:
1,089,037.46
Page:11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
01/22/2009 2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
1190 01/22/2009 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payment 126,078.25 126,078.25
RETIREMENT)
1191 01/22/2009 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT Nationwide Retirement Payment 18,760.13 18,760.13
SOLUTION
1192 01/22/2009 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- Project Retirement Payment 2,171.16 2,171.16
SOLUTION
1193 01/22/2009 000283 INSTATAX(IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 89,221.14 89,221.14
1194 01/22/2009 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Ins Payment 22,295.42 22,295.42
129379 01/15/2009 010653 CURTISBERAKHARPSICHORD Harpsichord rental:Theater 1/17 850.00 850.00
SRVCS
129446 01/22/2009 012245 ALEGRIA, GLENDA FAY Support Payment 1,091.00 1,091.00
129447 01/22/2009 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRVS emerg storm clean up: PW Maint 9,182.30
INC
emerg storm clean up: PW Maint 2,974.80 12,157.10
129448 01/22/2009 005665 BLACKS TOWING auto towing svc: Police 97.50 97.50
129449 01/22/2009 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT Support Payment 25.00 25.00
129450 01/22/2009 009431 CALIF FRANCHISE TAX- VEHICLE Support Pmt 339.00 339.00
129451 01/22/2009 011301 CALLAWAY MOTORSPORTS vehicle repair /maint: Police 573.53 573.53
129452 01/22/2009 009640 CERTIFION CORPORATION Dec online dbase subsc: Police 167.90 167.90
129453 01/22/2009 004837 CHERRY VALLEY FEED PET misc food supplies: Police K -9 185.29 185.29
SUPLY
129454 01/22/2009 004609 CINTAS DOCUMENT Dec doc shred svc:PD Old Town 32.50 32.50
MANAGEMENT
129455 01/22/2009 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARITIES Community Health Charities Payment 131.00 131.00
129456 01/22/2009 012293 CORNER SQUARE GROUP facility rental: teen dance 1/17 700.00 700.00
Page:1
apChkLst
01/22/2009
Final Check List Page: 2
2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor
129457 01/22/2009 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELING Fuel for City vehicles: CC /Info Sys
INC
129458 01/22/2009 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DIST
129459 01/22/2009 003665 EXCEL COMMERCIAL
129460 01/22/2009 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE
129461 01/22/2009 012633 FAITH AUTO GLASS TINTING
129462 01/22/2009 011562 FILIPPINI, ANGELO
129463 01/22/2009 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
PAYPAL
PLAYNETWORK, INC
CONSTANT CONTACT INC
FRANKLIN COVEY
CONFERENCE MANAGER.COM
CONFERENCE MANAGER.COM
AMAZON.COM, INC
SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR
129464 01/22/2009 001989 FOX NETWORK SYSTEMS INC
129465 01/22/2009 011967 FULL VALUE ENTERTAINMENT
129466 01/22/2009 004944 FULLCOURT PRESS
129467 01/22/2009 010326 G E MOBILE WATER, INC
(Continued)
Description
Fuel for City vehicles: Police
Jan 95366 -02 Diego Dr Ldscp
Dec long distance phone svcs
Dec Idscp maint: City Facilities
Irrigation repairs: Harveston
Irrigation upgrades: Vail Ranch
Irrigation repairs: Villages
Dec Idscp maint: Medians
Dec Idscp maint: Sports Pk /Schools
Dec Idscp maint: North Slopes
Dec Idscp maint: South Slopes
vehicle repair /maint: Code Enf
refund:freaky friday bk
TT Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction
TT radio equip /activation
TT Temecula Theater email svc 1 yr
TT Daily Planner Materials
RJ conference call svcs: Waterpark
RJ conference call svcs: Waterpark
RJ publication: "The New Urbanism"
RJ assessor map detail downloads
misc equip: Info Sys
sttlmnt: Battle of the Bands 1/9
sttlmnt: Battle of the Bands 1/16
business license forms: Finance
Dec osmosis washer maint:Stn 73
Amount Paid
61.99
35.05
19.14
54.45
9,685.00
51.61
595.01
427.68
14,987.00
43,040.00
28,494.00
41,885.00
229.00
20.00
76.50
855.19
630.00
43.06
25.14
44.92
49.80
16.00
860.67
533.40
168.00
856.27
55.00
Check Total
Page2
97.04
19.14
54.45
139,165.30
229.00
20.00
1,740.61
860.67
701.40
856.27
55.00
apChkLst
01/22/2009
Final Check List Page: 3
2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date
Vendor
129468 01/22/2009 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
INC
129469 01/22/2009 003792 GRAINGER
129470 01/22/2009 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
129471 01/22/2009 006250 HAZ MAT TRANS INC
129472 01/22/2009 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
303355
129473 01/22/2009 004406 IGOE COMPANY INC
129474 01/22/2009 012670 JACKSON, RICHARD
129475 01/22/2009 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC
129477 01/22/2009 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC
129478 01/22/2009 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS
(Continued)
Description
Office Supplies: MPSC
Office Supplies: CRC
Office Supplies: Info Sys
Office Supplies: Theater
Office Supplies: City Clerk
Office Supplies: Records
Office supplies: PW Admin
Office Supplies: CM
Office Supplies: Planning
Office Supplies: B &S
maintenance supplies: Stn 84
maintenance supplies: Stn 84
Hardware supplies: Fire
Hardware supplies: MPSC
Hardware supplies: TV Museum
Hardware supplies: TCC
Hardware supplies:TV /Ch Museums
Haz Mat svcs: PW waste disposal
I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Payment
Dec flex benefit plan pmt
credit: Dec flex benefit plan pmt
refund:sec dep:CRC rental
equip /parts: CRC TES pools
129476 01/22/2009 012065 LANCE, SOLL LUNGHARD LLC 07/08 RDA Audit Svcs: Finance
07/08 RDA Audit Svcs: Finance
07/08 RDA Audit Svcs: Finance
Medical Supplies: Paramedics
Medical Supplies: Paramedics
misc street signs: PW Maint
misc street signs: PW Maint
misc street signs: PW Maint
Amount Paid
Check Total
64.61
293.13
85.44
133.26
239.00
52.31
660.36
75.98
234.78
8.58 1,847.45
18.06
83.33 101.39
653.77
67.70
25.77
7.39
61.58 816.21
371.25 371.25
9,063.29 9,063.29
382.50
-7.50 375.00
75.00 75.00
1,241.85 1,241.85
1,250.00
479.00
3,356.00 5,085.00
379.78
1,381.53 1,761.31
3,314.39
899.71
2,221.97 6,436.07
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
01/22/2009 2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129479 01/22/2009 004141 MAINTEX INC Custodial Supplies: Ch Museum 74.02
Custodial Supplies: Maint Facility 98.70
Custodial Supplies: CRC 98.70
Custodial Supplies: CRC 623.83
Custodial Supplies: Library 500.13
Custodial Supplies: Ch Museum 312.58
Custodial Supplies: Fld Op Ctr 500.13 2,208.09
129480 01/22/2009 012671 MORALES, VICKI refund:the crucible bk 12.00 12.00
129481 01/22/2009 000845 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 3/1/09- 2/28/10 642 City mbrshp dues 6,697.00 6,697.00
129482 01/22/2009 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS Jan -Mar assn dues xx20: F.V. Intrchg 564.02
PARK
Jan -Mar assn dues xx17: F.V. Intrchg 415.13 979.15
129483 01/22/2009 009694 ONSTAGE MUSICALS Oscar/Tony Hits 1/18/09 5,471.00 5,471.00
129484 01/22/2009 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PERS Long Term Care Payment 377.54 377.54
PROGRAM
129485 01/22/2009 012672 RAMOS, RICHIE refund:algebra adventure bk 19.99 19.99
129486 01/22/2009 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR WASH Dec City vehicle detailing 84.00 84.00
129487 01/22/2009 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING elec. supplies:prks /mpsc /o.t. /t.mus 356.48 356.48
129488 01/22/2009 012545 RENNER, ANDREW V. holiday train:Old Town 12/12/08 678.00 678.00
129489 01/22/2009 002412 RICHARDS WATSON GERSHON Nov 2008 legal services 94,082.06 94,082.06
129490 01/22/2009 012148 RICHARDSON TECHNOLOGIES HVAC repair:theater 502.39
INC
HVAC repair:MPSC 261.00 763.39
129491 01/22/2009 006432 RIVERSIDE COMM. COLLEGE Arrest,Search /Seizure trn:R.J. 30.00 30.00
DIST.
129492 01/22/2009 006815 SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF Support Payment 12.50 12.50
129493 01/22/2009 009980 SANBORN, GWYN Country the Merc 1/10/09 508.50
Country the Merc 1/17/09 499.50 1,008.00
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
01/22/2009 2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
129494 01/22/2009 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV CENTRAL Support Payment 461.88 461.88
129495 01/22/2009 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV CENTRAL Support Payment 200.00 200.00
129496 01/22/2009 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV CENTRAL Support Payment 100.00 100.00
129497 01/22/2009 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz the Merc 1/8/09 420.00
Jazz the Merc 1/15/09 294.00 714.00
129498 01/22/2009 001544 SKANSKA USA CIVIL WEST Dec Const:Education Center 116,000.00 116,000.00
129499 01/22/2009 000645 SMART FINAL INC Misc supplies:senior health fair 167.62
Misc supplies:mpsc 270.17 437.79
129500 01/22/2009 005154 SMITH, ROBIN refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
129501 01/22/2009 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Dec 2 -29- 974 -7568 Ynez Rd TC -1 91.67
Jan 2 -28- 397 -1315 Redhawk Pkwy 18.08
Jan 2 -26- 887 -0789 40233 village ped 1,551.00 1,660.75
129502 01/22/2009 002503 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY ann'I emissions fee /emerg gen:C.H. 109.00
ann'I operating fees/emerg gen:C.H. 293.21 402.21
129503 01/22/2009 010972 SPORTS FACILITIES GROUP INC Install scoreboard:hockey rink 9,735.00 9,735.00
129504 01/22/2009 012673 TEMECULA VALLEY ELKS refund:sec dep:CRC rental 150.00 150.00
129505 01/22/2009 012674 TUCKER II, PHILLIP refund:library rm rental 42.00 42.00
129506 01/22/2009 004759 TWIN GRAPHICS Vehicle Graphics:Police 565.69 565.69
129507 01/22/2009 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 63.00 63.00
129508 01/22/2009 004261 VERIZON Jan xxx -5072 general usage 2,304.10 2,304.10
129509 01/22/2009 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Dec access CRC phone line 320.00
Dec access C. Mus.phone line 591.40 911.40
129510 01/22/2009 004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES INC Jan long distance phone svcs 706.53 706.53
PageS
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6
01/22/2009 2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check Date Vendor
(Continued)
Description
129511 01/22/2009 009101 VISION ONE INC Dec ticketing software license:theater
Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA:
Amount Paid Check Total
2,393.40 2,393.40
695,625.57
Page:6
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
01/22/2009 2:51:25PM CITY OF TEMECULA
72 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks.
FUNDS:
001 GENERAL FUND
165 RDA LOW/MOD -20% SET ASIDE
190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C LANDSCAPE /SLOPE
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAIN T.
197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- CIPPROJECT
300 INSURANCE FUND
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330 SUPPORT SERVICES
340 FACILITIES
477 CFD- RORIPAUGH
01/22/2009 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
286,974.64
124,205.72
127,321.95
110.47
74,051.38
1,068.05
2,243.52
1,882.32
28,816.96
3,761.56
2,307.60
24,965.24
2,180.93
6,328.72
9,406.51
695,625.57
695, 625.57
Page:7
ITEM NO. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2008
PREPARED BY: Rudy Graciano, Revenue Manager
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31,
2008.
BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the
City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively.
Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next
six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements.
Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and
Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of December 31, 2008.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2008
Investments
Certificates of Deposit Bank
Managed Pool Accounts
Letter of Credit
Local Agency Investment Funds
Commercial Paper Interest Bearing
Federal Agency Callable Securities
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
Investment Contracts
Investments
Cash and Accrued Interest
Passbook/Checking
(not included in yield calculations)
Accrued Interest at Purchase
Subtotal
Total Cash and Investments
Total Earnings
Current Year
Average Daily Balance
Effective Rate of Return
Reporting period 12/01/2008- 12/31/2008
Run Date: 01/30/2009 08:29
Par
Value
873,983.53
107,648,175.99
3.00
41,584,207.60
5,236,000.00
50,000,000.00
9,879,000.00
2,031,468.76
217,252,838.88
4,579,252.62
221,832,091.50
December 31 Month Ending
564,934 46
221,917,046.75
3.00%
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
December 31, 2008
Market
Value
873,983.53
107,648,175.99
3.00
41,674,864.63
5,226,837.30
50,945,330.00
10,155,871.99
2,031,468.76
No fiscal year history available
873,983.53
107,648,175.99
3.00
41,584,207.60
5,236,000.00
49,996,937.50
9,855,601.99
2,031,468.76
218,556,535.20 217,226,378.37
4,579,252.62 4,579,252.62
2,135.42 2,135.42
4,581,388.04 4,581,388.04
223,137,923.24 221,807,766.41
Book %of
Value Portfolio
0.40
49.56
0.00
19.14
2.41
23.02
4.54
0.94
Term
1,177
1
1
1
178
1,348
816
6,979
100.00% 422 312 3.010 3.052
1
Days to
Maturity
608
1
1
1
60
1,090
600
3,165
1
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
P.O. BoX 9033
Temecula, CA, 92590
(951)694 -6430
YTM YTM
360 Equiv. 365 Equiv.
5.600 5.678
2.509 2.544
0.000 0.000
2.707 2.744
3.310 3.356
4.010 4.066
3.790 3.843
5.509 5.585
0.000 0.000
422 312 3.010 3.052
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver. 5.00
CUSIP
Managed Pool
122216003 -2
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
744727009
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
31846V401
Run Date: 01/30/2009 08:29
Investment
Issuer
Certificates of Deposit Bank
95453518 -2 88 -12 GENIM2 USBANK
Subtotal and Average
Accounts
CITY COP RE2
01 -2 IMP2
01 -2 RESA2
01 -2 RES B2
01 -2 SP TAX2
03 -1 ACQA1
03 -1 ACQB2
03 -1 BOND2
03 -1 RESA2
03 -1 RESB2
03 -1 SPTAX2
03 -2 ACQ2
03 -2 EMW D2
03 -2 IMP2
03 -2 LOC22
03 -2 PW ADM2
03 -2 RES2
03 -2 SP TX2
03 -3 ACQ1
03 -3 BOND2
03 -3 CITY1
03 -3 EMWD 1
03 -3 RES2
03 -3 SP TAX2
03 -4 ADMIN1
03 -4 PREPMT1
03 -4 REDEMP1
03 -4 RES1
03 -6 BOND1
03 -6 IMP1
03 -6 RES1
03 -6 SPTAX1
88 -12 BOND1
88 -12 GEN1
ASSURED GUARANTY
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
First American Treasury
Average
Balance
873,983.53
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Investments
December 31, 2008
Purchase
Date Par Value Market Value
06/12/2007 873,983.53
873,983.53
873,983.53
Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
873,983.53 873,983.53 5.600 5.600 5.678 608 09/01/2010
873,983.53
5.600 5.678 608
03/13/2008 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 0.986 1.000 1
12208/2008 256,932.41 256,932.41 256,932.41 0.540 0.533 0.540 1
12208/2008 83.51 83.51 83.51 0.540 0.533 0.540 1
12208/2008 41.34 41.34 41.34 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 65.18 65.18 65.18 0.540 0.533 0.540 1
12208/2008 4,268.81 4,268.81 4,268.81 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 15,099.63 15,099.63 15,099.63 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.540 0.533 0.540 1
12208/2008 21,269.12 21,269.12 21,269.12 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 2,308.74 2,308.74 2,308.74 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 67.98 67.98 67.98 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 91,949.14 91,949.14 91,949.14 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 4,225.68 4,225.68 4,225.68 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 4,011.51 4,011.51 4,011.51 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 415.80 415.80 415.80 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 745.69 745.69 745.69 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 367.23 367.23 367.23 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 88.73 88.73 88.73 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/04/2008 147,002.91 147,002.91 147,002.91 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/04/2008 874.21 874.21 874.21 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
0.15 0.15 0.15 0.960 0.947 0.960 1
12204/2008 2,216,941.51 2,216,941.51 2,216,941.51 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 92.92 92.92 92.92 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 6,760.55 6,760.55 6,760.55 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 4,067.85 4,067.85 4,067.85 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 1,879.62 1,879.62 1,879.62 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12204/2008 5,738.49 5,738.49 5,738.49 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12/08/2008 871.40 871.40 871.40 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 291.91 291.91 291.91 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 206.23 206.23 206.23 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 2,779.98 2,779.98 2,779.98 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
12208/2008 41,546.27 41,546.27 41,546.27 0.535 0.528 0.535 1
Page 2
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
Report Ver. 5.00
CUSIP
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
Investment Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
122216009 CITY COP COS First American Treasury 03/13/2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.960 0.947 0.960 1
31846V401 CITY COPCIP1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 1,164.01 1,164.01 1,164.01 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 CITY COPRES1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 541.64 541.64 541.64 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 COP CIPLPF1 First American Treasury 12/08/2008 41,063.85 41,063.85 41,063.85 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 02 INT First American Treasury 12/08/2008 217.77 217.77 217.77 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 02 PRIN1 First American Treasury 12/08/2008 143.85 143.85 143.85 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 06 CIPA1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 16,997.18 16,997.18 16,997.18 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 06A INT1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 200.25 200.25 200.25 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 06B CIP1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 6,818.80 6,818.80 6,818.80 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 06B INT1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 068 RES1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 202,135.32 202,135.32 202,135.32 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 07 CAPI1 First American Treasury 12/08/2008 465.49 465.49 465.49 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
107886029 RDA 07 COI First American Treasury 11/01/2007 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.820 1.795 1.820 1
31846V401 RDA 07 ESC1 First American Treasury 12/08/2008 454.43 454.43 454.43 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 07 INT1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 25.16 25.16 25.16 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 07 PROJ1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 17,315.10 17,315.10 17,315.10 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 RDA 07 RES1 First American Treasury 12208/2008 91.38 91.38 91.38 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
31846V401 TCSD COPINT First American Treasury 12/08/2008 70.57 70.57 70.57 0.530 0.523 0.530 1
793593011 -1 03 -2 -1 ACQUI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 07/01/2007 42,071,791.82 42,071,791.82 42,071,791.82 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
793593009 -1 03 -2 -1 EMWD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 07/01/2007 1,528,430.40 1,528,430.40 1,528,430.40 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
793593007 -1 03 -2 -1 IMPRO CA Local Agency Investment Fun 07/01/2007 1,175,957.81 1,175,957.81 1,175,957.81 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
793593010 -1 03 -2 -1 PW AD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 07/01/2007 632,799.05 632,799.05 632,799.05 2.568 2.533 2.568 1
793593006 -3 03 -2 -3 RESER CA Local Agency Investment Fun 07/01/2007 3,528,305.54 3,528,305.54 3,528,305.54 2.568 2.533 2.568 1
122216008 CITY COP CIP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03/13/2008 22,676,413.67 22,676,413.67 22,676,413.67 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
122216003 -1 CITY COP RE1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03/13/2008 804,408.81 804,408.81 804,408.81 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
107886008 -1 RDA 06 CIP -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 13,655,428.72 13,655,428.72 13,655,428.72 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
107886018 -2 RDA 06 CIP -2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 2,999,415.65 2,999,415.65 2,999,415.65 2.709 2.672 2.709 1
107886030 -1 RDA 07 CAP -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11/01/2007 358,587.03 358,587.03 358,587.03 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
107886027 -1 RDA 07 ESC -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11/01/2007 4,176,506.23 4,176,506.23 4,176,506.23 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
107886028 -1 RDA 07 PRO -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11/01/2007 10,081,526.49 10,081,526.49 10,081,526.49 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
107886026 -1 RDA 07 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11/01/2007 839,901.60 839,901.60 839,901.60 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
107886006 RDA 06 RES A MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.190 2.160 2.190 1
94434166 RDA TABS RES MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.190 2.160 2.190 1
Letter of Credit
Subtotal and Average 108,006,212.37
104348006 -1 02008 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2007
793593006 -2 02006 Citibank, N.A. 07/01/2007
Run Date: 01/30/2009 06:29
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Investments
December 31, 2008
107,648,175.99
107,648,175.99 107,648,175.99
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
1509 2.544 1
0.000 0.000 1
0.000 0.000 1
Page 3
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
CUSIP
Letter of Credit
793593006 -1
Local Agency Investment Funds
94669911 -1 03 -1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,485,566.82 1,485,566.82 1,485,566.82 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
94669921 -1 03 -1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,798,805.77 3,798,805.77 3,798,805.77 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
744727011 -1 03 -3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,800,380.16 3,800,380.16 3,800,380.16 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
744727007 -1 03 -3 CITY 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,906,174.13 1,906,174.13 1,906,174.13 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
744727009 -1 03 -3 EMWD 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.779 2.741 2.779 1
786776007 -1 03 -6 IMP 1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 508,758.75 508,758.75 508,758.75 2.353 2.321 2.353 1
SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 9,026,629.47 9,053,830.41 9,026,629.47 2.894 2.854 2.894 1
SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 11,899,070.00 11,934,926.79 11,899,070.00 2.894 2.854 2.894 1
SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 9,158,822.50 9,186,421.80 9,158,822.50 2.894 2.854 2.894 1
Commercial Paper Interest Bearing
104348006 -3
104348016 -2
104348000 -3
94669916 -3
94669900 -3
793593016 -3
793593000 -2
744727000 -3
94686006 -3
786776006 -3
Federal Agency Callable Securities
3133X4M1 01075 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/28/2007 1,000,000.00 1,027,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 4.932 5.000 1,366 09/28/2012
31331YSC5 01085 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/06/2008 2,000,000.00 2,026,880.00 2,000,000.00 3.590 3.541 3.590 1,131 02/06/2012
31331YQX1 01086 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/11/2008 2,000,000.00 2,005,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 406 02/11/2010
31331YTS9 01087 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/14/2008 2,000,000.00 2,034,380.00 2,000,000.00 3.750 3.699 3.750 1,502 02/11/2013
31331YYR5 01091 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/24/2008 1,000,000.00 1,005,310.00 1,000,000.00 3.150 3.107 3.150 812 03/24/2011
31331YV49 01096 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/11/2008 2,000,000.00 2,023,760.00 2,000,000.00 4.150 4.093 4.150 1,257 06/11/2012
31331Y2F6 01099 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/30/2008 2,000,000.00 2,033,120.00 2,000,000.00 4.230 4.172 4.230 910 06/30/2011
31331Y3E8 01103 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/15/2008 1,000,000.00 1,030,310.00 1,000,000.00 3.950 3.896 3.950 925 07/15/2011
31331Y4G2 01106 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/28/2008 1,000,000.00 1,015,310.00 1,000,000.00 3.300 3.255 3.300 573 07/28/2010
Run Date: 01/30/2009 08:29
Subtotal and Average 41,100,336.63
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Investments
December 31, 2008
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
Investment Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
02005 Ohio Savings Bank 07/01 /2007 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1
Subtotal and Average 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.000 0.000 1
41,584,207.60
01 -2 RES A 2 American International Group M 09/05/2008 447,500.00 446,716.88
01 -2 RES B 2 American International Group M 09/05/2008 206,000.00 205,639.50
01 -2 SP TX 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 81,600.00 81,457.47
03 -1 RES B 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 226,550.00 226,153.54
03 -1 SP TX 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 162,700.00 162,415.28
03 -2 LOC -3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 3,504,400.00 3,498,267.30
03 -2 SP TX 2 American International Group M 09/05/2008 130,100.00 129,872.33
03 -3 SP TX 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 40,750.00 40,678.69
03 -4 RES 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 93,300.00 93,136.73
03 -6 RES 3 American International Group M 09/05/2008 343,100.00 342,499.58
Subtotal and Average 5,236,000.00 5,236,000.00 5,226,837.30
41,674,864.63 41,584,207.60
2.707 2.744 1
447,500.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
206,000.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
81,600.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
226,550.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
162,700.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
3,504,400.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
130,100.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
40,750.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
93,300.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
343,100.00 3.310 3.310 3.356 60 03/02/2009
5,236,000.00 3.310 3.356 60
Page 4
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
CUSIP
Run Date: 01/30/2009 -08:29
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Investments
December 31, 2008
Page 5
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
Investment Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Callable Securities
31331Y4H0 01107 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/28/2008 1,000,000.00 1,016,250.00 1,000,000.00 3.750 3.699 3.750 938 07/28/2011
31331Y5N6 01112 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/20/2008 1,000,000.00 1,019,690.00 1,000,000.00 4.250 4.192 4.250 1,327 08/20/2012
31331Y5J5* 01113 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/21/2008 1,000,000.00 1,019,060.00 1,000,000.00 4.020 3.965 4.020 1,146 02/21/2012
31331Y5T3 01115 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/11/2008 1,000,000.00 1,018,750.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 952 08/11/2011
31331Y5V8 01117 Federal Farm Credit Bank 08/26/2008 1,000,000.00 1,019,380.00 1,000,000.00 4.400 4.340 4.400 1,698 08/26/2013
31331GAP4 01122 Federal Farm Credit Bank 09/04/2008 1,000,000.00 1,020,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.250 4.192 4.250 1,342 09/04/2012
3133XLSQ7 01069 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/2007 1,000,000.00 1,026,560.00 1,000,000.00 5.650 5.573 5.650 1,306 07/30/2012
3133XK2N4 01072 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/24/2007 2,000,000.00 2,015,000.00 2,000,000.00 5.330 5.256 5.329 1,160 03/06/2012
3133XM5R8 01073 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/28/2007 1,000,000.00 1,027,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.080 5.011 5.080 967 08/26/2011
3133XM5E7 01074 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/28/2007 1,000,000.00 1,026,560.00 1,000,000.00 5.220 5.135 5.206 1,335 08/28/2012
3133XQEF5 01089 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/02/2008 1,000,000.00 1,007,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.800 3.748 3.800 1,187 04/02/2012
3133XQY48 01093 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/28/2008 1,000,000.00 1,008,750.00 1,000,000.00 3.600 3.551 3.600 1,030 10/28/2011
3133XRSM3 01102 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/23/2008 1,000,000.00 1,041,250.00 1,000,000.00 4.050 3.993 4.049 1,117 01/23/2012
3133XRTQ3 01104 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/2008 1,000,000.00 1,017,500.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.946 4.001 1,215 04/30/2012
3133XRVA5 01109 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/2008 1,000,000.00 1,040,630.00 1,000,000.00 4.220 4.162 4.220 1,306 07/30/2012
3133XRWE6 01110 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/12/2008 1,000,000.00 1,035,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.125 4.068 4.125 953 08/12/2011
3133XRXX3 01116 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/20/2008 1,000,000.00 1,038,130.00 1,000,000.00 4.070 4.014 4.070 1,327 08/20/2012
3133XRYN4 01118 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/20/2008 1,000,000.00 1,017,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.375 3.329 3.375 596 08/20/2010
3133XRZN3 01119 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/27/2008 1,000,000.00 1,019,690.00 999,750.00 4.000 3.953 4.008 1,152 02/27/2012
3133XS2J6 01120 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/27/2008 1,000,000.00 1,016,560.00 1,000,000.00 3.375 3.329 3.375 603 08/27/2010
3133XS3A4 01121 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/28/2008 1,000,000.00 1,018,440.00 1,000,000.00 3.625 3.559 3.609 788 02/28/2011
3133XKH24 1062 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/16/2007 1,000,000.00 1,012,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.250 5.178 5.250 1,201 04/16/2012
3128X6L61 01084 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 02204/2008 2,000,000.00 2,004,660.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,495 02/04/2013
3128X7TY0 01095 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 06/04/2008 2,000,000.00 2,024,400.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,250 06/04/2012
3136F8TE5 01078 Federal National Mtg Assn 10/15/2007 1,000,000.00 1,001,560.00 1,000,000.00 5.002 4.936 5.005 925 07/15/2011
3136F9C137 01088 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/11/2008 2,000,000.00 2,105,620.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,530 03/11/2013
3136F9DP5 01090 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/27/2008 1,000,000.00 1,055,000.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,546 03/27/2013
3136F9MU4 01094 Federal National Mtg Assn 04/30/2008 1,000,000.00 1,007,190.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 484 04/30/2010
3136F9UF8 01097 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/24/2008 1,000,000.00 1,013,440.00 1,000,000.00 3.600 3.551 3.600 722 12/24/2010
3136F9UP6 01098 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/24/2008 1,000,000.00 1,015,310.00 997,187.50 4.000 4.044 4.101 904 06/24/2011
3136F9WV1 01100 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/02/2008 1,000,000.00 1,016,250.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 547 07/02/2010
3136F9YW7 01108 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/05/2008 1,000,000.00 1,018,750.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 946 08/05/2011
Subtotal and Average 49,996,937.50 50,000,000.00 50,945,330.00 49,996,937.50 4.010 4.066 1,090
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
31331XMQ2 01059 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/26/2007 1,000,000.00 1,057,500.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 4.934 5.002 510 05/26/2010
31331YG46 01092 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/21/2008 2,000,000.00 2,058,120.00 1,993,700.00 2.630 2.703 2.740 840 04/21/2011
31331Y3P3 01105 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/15/2008 1,000,000.00 1,053,440.00 998,140.00 3.500 3.514 3.563 1,005 10/03/2011
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
CUSIP
Investment Contracts
95453518 -1 88 -12 GEN IM
95453516 -1 88 -12 RES 2
Run Date: 01/30/2009 08:29
IXIS Funding Corp
IXIS Funding Corp
Subtotal and Average 2,031,468.76
Total and Average 221,917,046.75
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Investments
December 31, 2008
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
Investment Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
31331¥3N8 01111 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/30/2008 1,000,000.00 1,055,000.00 999,000.00 3.625 3.610 3.661 925 07/15/2011
3133XRRU6 01101 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/03/2008 1,000,000.00 1,056,560.00 998,570.00 3.625 3.626 3.676 911 07/01/2011
3133XSDC9 01123 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/02/2008 2,000,000.00 2,005,000.00 2,000,000.00 3.250 3.250 3.295 32 02/02/2009
313385CN4 03 -1 RES A 3 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/25/2008 879,000.00 866,191.99 866,191.99 3.410 6.757 6.851 60 03/02/2009
3136F9ZU0 01114 Federal National Mtg Assn 08/18/2008 1,000,000.00 1,004,060.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 778 02/18/2011
Subtotal and Average 9,927,129.12 9,879,000.00 10,155,871.99 9,855,601.99 3.790 3.843 600
07/24/1998
07/24/1998
500,000.00
1,631,468.76
500,000.00
1,531,468.76
2,031,468.76 2,031,468.76
Page 6
500,000.00 5.430 5.509 5.585 3,165 09/01/2017
1,531,468.76 5.430 5.509 5.585 3,165 09/01/2017
2,031,468.76 5.509 5.585 3,165
217,252,838.88 218,556,535.20 217,226,378.37 3.010 1052 312
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
CUSIP
Retention Escrow Account
Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to
Investment Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity
SYSAAA #1202 AAA #1202 COMMUNITY BANK 08/29/2008 274,796.03 274,796.03 274,796.03 0.000 0.000 1
4110170281 EDGEDEV TORRY PINES BANK 11/14/2008 20,436.82 20,436.82 20,436.82 0.000 0.000 1
Passbook /Checking Accounts
SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2007 2,810.00 2,810.00 2,810.00 0.000 0.000 1
SYSFIex Ck Acct Flex Ck Acct Union Bank of California 07/01/2007 23,806.44 23,806.44 23,806.44 0.000 0.000 1
SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 07/01/2007 4,241,705.58 4,241705.58 4,241,705.58 0.000 0.000 1
SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2007 15,697.75 15,697.75 15,697.75 0.000 0.000 1
Run Date: 01/30/2009 06:29
Average Balance
Total Cash and Investments 221,917,046.75
City of Temecula, California
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details Cash
December 31, 2008
0.00 Accrued Interest at Purchase 2,135.42
Subtotal 4,581,388.04 4,581,388.04
2,135.42 1
221,832,091.50 223,137,923.24 221,807,766.41 3.010 3.052 312
Page 7
Portfolio TEME
CP
PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept 6.41.202a
Cash and Investments Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
Through December 2008
Fund Total
001 GENERAL FUND 43,187,682.67
100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 0.00
101 STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND 247,095.46
120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,352,683.14
140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 54.04
150 AB 2766 FUND 501,022.45
160 AB 3229 COPS 0.00
165 RDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 20% SET ASIDE 8,460,276.39
170 MEASURE A FUND 8,654,195.82
190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 615,162.35
192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 3,593.24
193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" LANDSCAPE /SLOPE 29,443.55
194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" 389,917.28
195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET /ROAD 38,410.06
196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 142,321.74
197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 2,085,081.87
210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 40,551,351.17
261 CFD 88 -12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND 0.00
271 CFD 01 -2 HARVESTON IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.00
272 CFD 01 -2 HARVESTON A &B IMPROVEMENT 256,932.41
273 CFD 03 -1 CROWNE HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND 5,303,741.03
274 AD 03 -4 JOHN WARNER IMPROVEMENT FUND 0.00
275 CFD 03 -3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 5,854,431.56
276 CFD 03 -6 HARVESTON 2 IMPROVEMENT FUND 509,630.15
277 CFD RORIPAUGH 44,875,793.64
280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIP PROJECT 18,679,663.13
300 INSURANCE FUND 1,598,345.25
310 VEHICLES FUND 687,378.06
320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 264,110.33
330 SUPPORT SERVICES 278,209.33
340 FACILITIES 38,195.93
370 CITY 2008 COP'S DEBT SERVICE 846,228.67
380 RDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 16,830,715.91
390 TCSD 2001 COP'S DEBT SERVICE 9,131.03
460 CFD 88 -12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,553,893.16
470 CFD 01 -2 HARVESTON DEBT SERVICE FUND 0.00
471 CFD 98 -1 WINCHESTER HILLS DEB SERVICE 0.00
472 CFD 01 -2 HARVESTON A &B DEBT SERVICE 749,274.53
473 CFD 03 -1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,288,301.30
474 AD 03 -4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 112,831.97
475 CFD 03 -3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,549,001.11
476 CFD 03 -6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 355,236.54
477 CFD- RORIPAUGH 8,152,240.79
700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE GASB45 3,048,502.59
Grand Total: 226,100, 079.65
Less: CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE GASB45* (2,962,156.41)
223,137,923.24
ITEM NO. 5
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for
Fiscal Year 2009 -10
PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Finance Committee funding
recommendations for fiscal year 2009 -10.
2. Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub Recipient Agreements for2009 -10 funding
recipients and reprogram CDBG funds in accordance with the budget resolution for general
administration of the fiscal year 2009 -10 Community Development Block Grant Funds.
3. Authorize the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for the Use of
Community Block Grant Funds, dated November 15, 2006.
BACKGROUND: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City
annually through the Economic Development Agency of Riverside County (EDA).
The City's allocation for fiscal year 2009 -10 is expected to be at least the same as the previous
fiscal year: $407,000. According to CDBG regulations, only 15% of the total allocation can be
allocated to Public Services. The remainder will be used for our public facility project, the Old Town
Gymnasium.
The City invited applications for funding from non profit agencies who meet one of the following
goals:
1. The project/activity benefits 51 low /moderate income persons.
2. The project/activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight.
3. The activity meets an emergent community development need.
Fiscal Year 2009 -10 CDBG ALLOCATION
FUNDING CATEGORY
FUNDING ALLOCATION
Public Services (15% cap)
61,000
Public Facilities (Temecula Community Center
Expansion)
355,000
Requested CDBG Allocation for FY 2009/10
416,000
A total of 14 funding applications were submitted to the City for consideration and all were
determined to be eligible for CDBG funding. As summarized in the following table, the Finance
Committee is recommending a total expenditure of $61,000 for Public Services (which is 15% of last
year's allocation), and $355,000 for Public Facilities.
In the event that the City's allocation is reduced, it is recommended that all projects be reduced
equally, according to the percentage in allocation reduction. All projects are subject to final approval
at a future Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting. The EDA will submit a Supplemental
Agreement to the City identifying the projects approved for funding in July, 2009.
The Finance Committee, composed of Mayor Maryann Edwards and Council Member Mike Naggar,
met on November 25, 2008. After thorough review, the Finance Committee proposed CDBG
funding for eight (8) public service organizations and one City capital project. Although the Finance
Committee requested funding for the Old Town Gymnasium Project, this has been changed to the
Temecula Community Center Expansion Project as described in the attached Finance Committee
Funding Recommendations in order to comply with previous Finance Committee recommendations.
The Amendment to the Supplemental Agreement for the Use of Community Block Grant Funds
dated November 15, 2006, will reprogram $354,052 fiscal year 2008 -09 CDBG funds from the Old
Town Gymnasium project to the Temecula Community Center (TCC) expansion. The current
allocation for the TCC expansion is $1,581,599. With execution of the Amendment to the
Supplemental Agreement, the total funding for the TCC expansion will increase to $1,935,651. The
additional allocation for fiscal year 2009 -10 will increase the funding of the project to $2,290,651.
FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have minimal impact on the
City related to staff time to administer program requirements.
ATTACHMENTS: Finance Committee Funding Recommendations for Fiscal Year 2009 -10
CDBG Application Summary for Fiscal Year 2009 -10 Funding Cycle
Amendment to Supplemental Agreement for the Use of Community Block
Grant Funds, dated November 15, 2006.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
FY 2008/09
Funding
Request
FY 2008/09
Funding
Award
FY 2009/2010
Funding
Request
FY 2009/2010
Funding
Recommendation
Temecula Community Center Expansion
$364,070
$354,052
$355,000
$355,000
PUBLIC SERVICES
Alternatives to Domestic Violence (ADV)
Outreach Program Services
$75,230
$0
$15,000
$0
Assistance League of Temecula Valley
Operation School Bell
10,000
7,200
10,000
10,000
Boys Girls Club of Southwest County
The Learning Center
30,000
7,200
30,000
7,000
CASA for Riverside County
Advocacy for Abused Children
0
0
10,000
7,000
Musician's Workshop
Performing Arts and Music Access
0
0
10,000
0
Neighborhood Healthcare
Diabetes Self- Management Program
0
0
8,500
0
New Vision Children's Services
SW Center for Autism Spectrum Disorders
0
0
20,000
2,000
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Rape Prevention Education
5,000
0
5,000
5,000
Safe Alternatives For Everyone, Inc.
Family Support Program
15,000
13,272
15,000
10,000
Senior Citizen Service Center
Temecula Emergency Assistance Program
10,000
9,000
10,000
10,000
Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship
Single Moms in Balance
0
0
10,000
0
Valley Oaks Ranch
Equine Intervention Program
0
0
26,424
0
VNW
Circle of Care Program
11,500
9,000
25,000
10,000
Volunteer Center of Riverside County
211 Call Center
5,000
0
14,550
0
YMCA
Swim Camp /Swim Lessons
10,000
7,464
No request
0
Total Public Services
$171,730
$53,136
$209,474
$61,000
Total Public Facilities /Infrastructure
$364,070
$354,052
$355,000
$355,000
GRAND TOTAL
$535
$407,188
$564,474
$416,000
CITY OF TEMECULA
C D B G 2009/2010
FINANCE COMMITTEE
FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
*The Temecula Community Center Expansion Project was requested in 2008 -09, but was
recorded by EDA for the Old Town Gym. Execution of the Amendment to the Supplemental
Agreement will correct this omission and reprogram the funds to the Temecula Community
Center Expansion Project.
Alternatives To Domestic
Violence
Outreach Services to
Families Impacted by
Domestic Violencd
15,000
Provision of services to
victims of domestic violence.
Rent, Utilities,
Salaries
Assistance League of
Temecula Valley
Operation School Bell
10,000
Provision of clothing and
supplies for children.
Clothing for
children
Boys Girls Clubs of
Southwest County
The Learning Connection
30,000
Before- and after school care
for underserved youth.
Scholarships
CASA for Riverside County
Advocacy for Abused,
Neglected and Abandoned
Children
10,000
Recruit, train and supervise 10
community volunteers,
Salaries, Benefits,
Supplies, Training
Musicians Workshop
Performing Arts and Music
Access
10,000
Performing arts and music
programs for underserved,
special needs and at -risk
youth.
Full and Partial
Scholarships
Neighborhood Healthcare
Project Dulce Diabetes Self-
Management Program
g,500
To improve access to health
care services for underserved
and unfunded people with
poorly managed diabetes.
Partial
Scholarships
New Vision Children's
Services
Southwest Center for
Autism Spectrum Disorders
20,000
Provision of autism education,
support and treatment
services.
Rent, Utilities
Riverside Area Rape Crisis
Center
Rape Prevention Education
5,000
Support to rape victims
including crisis intervention
and advocacy.
Salaries, Space
costs
Safe Alternatives for
Everyone, Inc.
Police Activities League
Violence Prevention
Program
15,000
Provision of services to at -risk
youth to avoid violence and
abuse.
Salaries
Senior Citizens Service
Center
Emergency Food
10,000
Provision of food to people
who meet income guidelines.
Rent, Utilities
Single Mothers United in
Rewarding Fellowship
(SMURF)
Single Moms In Balance
10 000
Provision of budget
counseling and life coaching.
Salaries, Benefits,
Consultants, Rent,
Supplies,
Telephone, Indirect
Costs
AGENCY
PROJECT
FUNDING
REQUEST
PROJECT SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF
FUNDING
City of Temecula
Temecula Community
Center Expansion
355,000
Public Facility
Construction
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITY REQUESTS
355,000
CITY OF TEMECULA
CDBG APPLICATION SUMMARY
2009/2010 FUNDING CYCLE
Valley Oaks Ranch
Equine Intervention
26,424
Psychotherapy using horses
as a catalyst for human
emotional growth and
development.
Salaries, Travel,
Telephone, Indirect
Costs
VNW Circle of Care
VNW Circle of Care
25,000
Provision of food and supplies
to low- income families.
Rent
Volunteer Center of
Riverside County
211 Riverside County
14,550
Information collection, data
management and resource
referral.
Salaries, Rent,
Telephone,
Supplies, Tech
Support
TOTAL PUBLIC SERVICES REQUESTS
209,474
TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTS
564,474
AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
FOR THE USE OF COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
File No.:3.TM 140
THIS AMENDMENT to the Supplemental Agreement made and entered
this day of by and between the COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," and the CITY OF
TEMECULA, hereinafter referred to as "CITY
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties hereto are the parties to a certain Cooperation
Agreement dated July 12, 2005, where as the City elected to participate with COUNTY, under
the terms of which certain Community Development Block Grant funds were allocated to said
CITY and designated for a specific use. Said Cooperation Agreement dated July 12, 2005, is
incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Amendment as if each and every
provision was set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend said Supplemental Agreement dated
November 15, 2006, as hereinafter set forth, to reflect an increase in funding for project:
3.TM140, Temecula Community Center (TCC) Expansion, $1,935,651.20.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants
and conditions hereinafter set forth, said Supplemental Agreement dated November 15, 2006, in
accordance with Paragraph 22, is hereby amended as follows:
1. Paragraph 2 is hereby amended by deleting item "D" in its entirety and
substituting in place and instead thereof item "D" as follows:
D. 3.TM140 Temecula Community Center Expansion, $1,935,651.20
2. Paragraph 3 is hereby amended by extending the term of the agreement to June
30, 2009.
3. "Exhibit D" is hereby amended by deleting in its entirety "Exhibit D" and
substituting in its place "Exhibit D- Amended
Except to the extent specifically modified or amended hereunder all of the terms,
covenants and conditions of said Supplemental Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
between the parties hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
Sponsor's Agreement to be duly executed this day and year first above written.
DATED:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
By:
By:
Suzanne Holland, Director
Community Services Division
CITY OF TEMECULA
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
CITY NAME: City of Temecula
ADDRESS: 417(1(1 Rucinecc Park Dr
Temecula, CA 92590
PROGRAM CONTACTS: Heidi Schrader
CDBG SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
SCOPE OF WORK (NON PUBLIC SERVICE)
PHONE: (951)693 -3923 FAX:
E -MAIL:
PROJECT NAME: Temecula Community Center (TCC) Expansion, 3.TM140
PROJECT LOCATION: 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, CA
LEVEL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: Environmental Assesment
CDBG ELIGIBILITY CODE: 24 CFR 570.201 (c) Public Facility
PROJECT FUNDING SUMMARY:
1 District 0 4 District 0
2 District $0 5 District $0
3 District $0 City Funding $1,935,651.20
Project to be administered by County (EDA) on behalf of City: YES NO
II. SCOPE OF SERVICE
A. Activities
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 1 of 6
City will be responsible for administering a 2006 -2007 Community Development Block Grant
for the Temecula Community Center Expansion in a manner satisfactory to the County of
Riverside and consistent with any standards required as a condition of providing these funds.
Such program will include the following activities eligible under the Community Development
Block Grant program:
Activity #1 The City of Temecula operates the Temecula Community Center in the Old
Town (low /mod income) section of the city. CDBG funds will be used for the
design and construction of a 3,600 square foot expansion to the existing facility.
B. National Objective
All activities funded with CDBG funds must comply with one of more of the CDBG program's
National Objective Criteria as required under 24 CFR 570.200(a)(2). City certifies that the
activity(ies) carried out under this Agreement will meet the following National Objective:
National Objective Criteria: Low Mod Area
CFR Reference: 570.208(a)(2)(i)
C. Levels of Accomplishment Goals and Performance Measures
The City agrees to implement and complete the following activity (ies):
Activity #1 Construction of a 2,800 square foot expansion to the Temecula Community Center.
Objectives (select one): Creating Suitable Living Environments
Providing Decent Affordable Housing
Creating Economic Opportunities
Outcome (select one):
D. City Capacity
CPD OUTCOME PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
Availability /Accessibility
Affordability
Sustainability (promoting livable or viable communities)
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 2 of 6
By executing this Supplemental Agreement, the City certifies that it has the appropriate number of
trained and knowledgeable staff, adequate facilities, proper equipment, required licensing and
permitting, and sufficient amount of financial resources necessary to implement and carry out the
activities funded with CDBG funds.
City will immediately notify County of any significant changes in organizational management,
assigned staff, change in facilities, loss or change in matching funds, or any other event that could
potentially impact the City or subrecipient's performance under this Agreement.
Any changes in the above items are subject to the prior approval of the County.
E. Performance Monitoring
The County of Riverside will monitor the performance of the City and its subrecipients against
goals and performance standards as stated above. Substandard performance as determined by the
County will constitute noncompliance with this Agreement. If action to correct such substandard
performance is not taken by the City within a reasonable period of time after being notified by
the County, contract suspension or termination procedures will be initiated.
F. Program Budget
It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by the County under this
Agreement shall not exceed $1,935,651.20. Drawdowns for the payment of eligible expenses
shall be made against the line item budgets specified in this Section and in accordance with
performance. Payments may be contingent upon certification of the Subrecipient's financial
management system in accordance with the standards specified in 24 CFR 84.21.
The County may require a more detailed budget breakdown than the one contained herein, and
the City shall provide such supplementary budget information in a timely fashion in the form and
content prescribed by the County. Any amendments to the budget must be approved in writing
by both the County and City.
III. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
A. Accounting Standards
The City agrees to comply with 24 CFR 84 or 85 as applicable and agrees to adhere to the
accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls,
and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.
B. Cost Principles
Line Item Amount:
Design/Construction Costs $1,935,651.20
Project Administration Costs
Engineering Costs
Acquisition Costs
Relocation Costs
Capital Equipment Costs
Other
TOTAL CDBG BUDGET $1,935,651.20
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 3 of 6
The City shall administer its program in conformance with OMB Circulars A -122, "Cost
Principles for Non Profit Organizations," A -21, "Cost Principles for Educational
Institutions," or OMB Circular A -87, "Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 4 of 6
Governments as applicable. These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred
whether charged on a direct or indirect basis
C. Documentation and Record Keeping
1. Records to be Maintained
The Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified
in 24 CFR 570.506, that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Agreement.
Such records shall include but not be limited to:
i Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken;
ii. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets one of
the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
iii. Records required to determine the eligibility of activities;
iv. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use or
disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG
assistance;
v. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal
opportunity components of the CDBG program;
vi. Financial records as required by 24 CFR 570.502, and 24 CFR
84.21 -28; and
vii. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K
of 24 CFR Part 570.
2. Records Retention
The City shall retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and
all other records pertinent to the Agreement for a period of five (5) years. The retention
period begins on the date of the submission of the County's annual performance and
evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Agreement are
reported on for the final time. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims,
audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have
started before the expiration of the five -year period, then such records must be retained
until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues, or the expiration of the five
year period, whichever occurs later.
3. Client Data
The City shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided.
Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other
basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information
shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.
4. Disclosure
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 5 of 6
The City understands that client information collected under this contract is private and
the use or disclosure of such information, when not directly connected with the
administration of the County's or City's responsibilities with respect to services provided
under this contract, is prohibited by applicable federal and State law unless written
consent is obtained from such person receiving service and, in the case of a minor, that of
a responsible parent /guardian.
5. Close -outs
The City's obligation to the County shall not end until all close -out requirements are
completed. Activities during this close -out period shall include, but are not limited to:
making final payments, disposing of program assets (including the return of all unused
materials, equipment, unspent cash advances, program income balances, and accounts
receivable to the County), and determining the custodianship of records. Not
withstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Agreement shall remain in effect during any
period that the City has control over CDBG funds, including program income.
6. Audits Inspections
All City records with respect to any matters covered by this Agreement shall be made
available to the County, HUD, and the Comptroller General of the United States or any of
their authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, as often as
deemed necessary, to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts of all relevant
data. Any deficiencies noted in audit reports must be fully cleared by the City within 30
days after receipt by the City. Failure of the City to comply with the above audit
requirements will constitute a violation of this contract and may result in the withholding
of future payments. The City hereby agrees to have an annual agency audit conducted in
accordance with current County policy concerning subrecipient audits and OMB Circular
A -133.
IV. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE
Unless pre- approved by County, City will perform and complete the activities described
in Section II in conformance with the schedule of tasks and milestones listed below:
Tasks Milestone Start Date Completion Date
Implement Project Activities Upon Notification from EDA
Execute Supplemental Agreement Novemeber 2006 November 2006
Notice to Incur Cost
Submit Quarterly Performance October 15, 2006 June 30, 2009
Reports to County
County Monitoring of City Ongoing
Program /Performance
City Submits Reimbursement
Requests
Monthly Submittal
Other Schedule TBD
CDBG- funded Project Complete June 30, 2009
V. SPECIAL CONDITIONS /PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT D- Amended
Page 6 of 6
City will submit necessary documentation for EDA to conduct NEPA environmental reviews and
review and approve construction /bidding documents.
ITEM NO. 6
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Support of the Plans for the Construction of a New Riverside County Regional
Detention Center (at the Request of Council Member Roberts)
PREPARED BY: Tamra Middlecamp, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF PLANS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A NEW RIVERSIDE COUNTY REGIONAL DETENTION
CENTER
BACKGROUND: A federal injunction requires Riverside County to release inmates
when the county's jails are at capacity. In 2007, Riverside County released more than 6,000
criminals before they had completed their sentences because jails were at capacity. Without
adequate inmate housing, Riverside County will be forced to continue the early release of criminals
who often return to the streets and commit new crimes against our residents, visitors, and property.
Riverside County is conducting the environmental review of a site for a detention center along
Interstate 10 near the community of Whitewater. The detention center will resemble a
manufacturing or distribution center similar to other facilities on that segment of Interstate 10. The
County determined that Interstate 10 location is best suited for a detention center because of its
close proximity to a transportation corridor and ease of access to county courts. The County has
concluded that there appear to be few negative environmental impacts associated with the proposed
Interstate 10 site for a detention center.
The detention center will house 2,000 inmates in its first phase and the site has potential to expand
to 7,200 inmate beds. The detention center will add amenities and infrastructure to the surrounding
neighborhoods. The detention center will generate about 1,500 public safety jobs at build out.
The County's priority is to protect residents and communities. A study for the nonpartisan Senate
Office of Research in California found that communities near correctional facilities tend to have
lower crime rates than those without them. Inmates will not be booked and /or released at the
detention center and state -of- the -art security will ensure inmates stay locked up and that nearby
neighborhoods remain safe.
The detention center will allow the County of Riverside to dramatically curtail the number of inmate
early releases and better ensure criminals stay off the streets and, therefore, enhance the quality of
life for all residents and visitors.
City staff recommends that the City Council support the Riverside County Regional Detention Center
in order to dramatically curtail the number of inmate releases and better ensure that criminals stay
off the streets. This will enhance the quality of life for all residents and visitors alike.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachments
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF PLANS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW RIVERSIDE COUNTY
REGIONAL DETENTION CENTER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the primary role of local elected officials is to protect the health,
safety and welfare of their residents; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula continues to work with local law enforcement
agencies to keep our streets safe and keep criminals behind bars; and
WHEREAS, a federal injunction requires Riverside County to release inmates
when the county's jails are at capacity; and
WHEREAS, in 2007 Riverside County released more than 6,000 criminals before
they had completed their sentences because jails were at capacity; and
WHEREAS, without adequate inmate housing Riverside County will be forced to
continue the early release of criminals who often return to the streets and commit new
crimes against our residents, visitors, and property; and
WHEREAS, Riverside County is conducting the environmental review of a site
fora detention center along Interstate 10 near the community of Whitewater; and
WHEREAS, the detention center will resemble a manufacturing or distribution
center similar to other facilities on that segment of Interstate 10; and
WHEREAS, the County has determined that the Interstate 10 location is best
suited for a detention center because of its close proximity to a transportation corridor
and ease of access to county courts; and
WHEREAS, the County has concluded that there appear to be few negative
environmental impacts associated with the proposed Interstate 10 site for a detention
center; and
WHEREAS, the detention center will house 2,000 inmates in its first phase and
the site has potential to expand to 7,200 inmate beds; and
WHEREAS, the detention center will add amenities and infrastructure to the
surrounding neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, the detention center will generate about 1,500 public safety jobs at
build out; and
WHEREAS, the detention center will allow the County to dramatically curtail the
number of inmate early releases and better ensure criminals stay off the streets and
therefore enhance the quality of life for all residents and visitors; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, DETERMINED AND ORDERED by the City Council
of the City of Temecula, in regular session assembled on February 10, 2009, that the City
Council has determined construction of a new detention facility is a regional public safety priority
and that the City Council endorses the project and recommends that Riverside County
move forward with construction of the regional detention center near the Interstate 10
location.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10th day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
ITEM NO. 7
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Acceptance of certain Public Streets into the City- Maintained System within
Tract Map No. 29639 -2 portions of Ynez Road, Date Street and Equity Drive
(located southwest of the intersection of Margarita Road and Date Street within
the Harveston Subdivision)
PREPARED BY: Dan York, Deputy Public Works Director /City Engineer
Steve Charette, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
The public streets now being accepted by this action are as follows:
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
Sief
Paz,
42,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE
CITY- MAINTAINED SYSTEM PORTIONS OF YNEZ ROAD, DATE
STREET AND EQUITY DRIVE (WITHIN TRACT NO. 29639 -2)
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 29639 -2 was recorded by the County Recorder on
November 3, 2003. The owner dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets
designated as lettered lots on the map. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication.
Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and
replacements were satisfactorily completed for the infrastructure streets Ynez Road, Date Street
and Equity Drive. The Performance Bond for these streets has been released. The one -year
Warranty Bond will be released at the end of the one -year period in December, 2009. The Labor
and Materials Bond will be released six months into the one -year warranty period in June, 2009.
Portions of Ynez Road, Date Street and Equity Drive as shown on attached Tract Map 29639 -2.
Acceptance into the City- maintained system of the completed infrastructure streets Ynez Road,
Date Street and Equity Drive will allow for the initiation of City Police traffic enforcement.
The other infrastructure streets shown on Tract Map No. 29639 -2 were previously accepted into
the maintained system at the June 12, 2007 City Council meeting. These previously accepted
street portions within Tract No. 29639 -2 consisted of Lot "B" (portion of Date Street east of Ynez
Road) and Lot "C" (portion of Harveston Drive between Lakehouse Road and Lakeview Road).
FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and or structural maintenance will be required
every 5 to 8 years.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 09 with Exhibits "A B" inclusive.
RESOLUTION NO. 09 -00
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO
THE CITY- MAINTAINED SYSTEM PORTIONS OF YNEZ
ROAD, DATE STREET AND EQUITY DRIVE (WITHIN TRACT
NO. 29639 -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, On November 3, 2003, the County Recorder recorded Tract Map No.
29639 -2 in which offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes were accepted by the
City of Temecula from Lennar Homes of California, Inc.; and,
WHEREAS, City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements
and all repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed for certain portions of Ynez
Road, Date Street and Equity Drive as shown on Tract Map No. 29639 -2; and,
WHEREAS, Only the Warranty Bond and Labor and Material Bond pertaining to this
tract for certain portions of Ynez Road, Date Street and Equity Drive have not been released;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula
hereby accepts into the City- Maintained Street System the streets offered to and accepted by
the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
10th day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2009
Accepting certain public streets offered to and accepted by
the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map 29639 -2 into
the City- Maintained Street System as described as follows:
1 Lot "A" (portion of Ynez Road) of said Tract Map No. 29639 -2.
2. Lot "D" (portion of Equity Drive) of said Tract Map No. 29639 -2
3. Lot "E" (portion of Date Street) of said Tract Map No. 29639 -2
z
-H
0
P1
X
CU
CC;
0
0)
Z
I 0
0
0
0
z
ITEM NO. 8
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Cost sharing Reimbursement for regional costs associated with the City's
Municipal Stormwater Permit FY 2008 -2009
PREPARED BY: Aldo Licitra, Associate Engineer /NPDES
Daniel A. York, Deputy Director /City Engineer
RECOM MENDATION: That the City Council approve payment to the Riverside County Flood
Control District in the sum of $163,768.34 as the City's portion of the cost sharing reimbursement
pursuant to the Implementation Agreement between the Santa Margarita Watershed Permittees
approved by the City Council in January 2005.
BACKGROUND: On January 26, 2005, the City of Temecula executed a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Implementation Agreement (IA) with the Riverside
County Flood Control District (RCFCD). The IA manages the regional components of the City's
NPDES Order (No. R9- 2004 -001) and establishes proportional cost shares for each permittee
based on a cost sharing formula. The RCFCD administers the IA, the regional components, and
associated costs.
The regional components of the City's NPDES Order that are covered by the agreement include
water sampling programs, the Watershed Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP), municipal staff
training, Watershed Annual Reports, business inspections, Receiving Water Monitoring Reports,
education programs, and Reports of Waste Discharge (ROWDs).
The cost for Temecula's share, based on the formula in the agreement, is $163,768.34 for
FY 2008 -09.
FISCAL IMPACT: $163,768.34 has been budgeted in the NPDES Operating Budget to
pay for Temecula's share associated with the agreement for FY 2008 -09.
ATTACHMENTS:
FY 2008 -09 Cost Sharing Reimbursement Invoice
Cost -Share Breakdown Table
Executed Implementation Agreement
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager -Chief Engineer
Mr. Shawn Nelson, City Manager
City of Temecula
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
Dear Mr. Nelson:
Attachments: Invoice
JU:cw
P8/122925
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
December 29, 2008
c: Santa Margarita NPDES Permit Representatives (via e-mail)
NPDES File
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager -Chief Engineer
g r t-A-- Qr.)
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
951.955.1200
FAX 951.788.9965
www .floodcontrol.co.riverside.ca.us
Re: FY 2008 -09 Cost Sharing Reimbursement
Regional Costs for Santa Margarita
NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit
In compliance with the Santa Margarita River Watershed NPDES Permit adopted by the San Diego Regional
Water Quality Control Board on July 14, 2004 as Order No. R9- 2004 -001 (NPDES No. CAS0108766) and the
Implementation Agreement (IA) adopted by the County, District, and Cities of Murrieta and Temecula
(Permittees) on March 1, 2005, a cost sharing provision between the Permittees was established. Per the IA,
Item 3 "Shared Costs" provides for annual cost sharing of estimated regional program costs "Estimated
Costs with the "Combined Contribution" from the County and Cities not to exceed $500,000 annually.
Although Item 3 also notes that the District shall invoice the County and Cities for their "Individual
Contribution" to the total "Combined Contribution" in two installments (50% each installment), it has been
verbally agreed by all Permittees that this year the District will invoice the County and Cities for their
contribution of the Fiscal Year 2008 -09 "Estimated Costs" in one installment (100% contribution).
The District has determined the "Estimated Costs" for the period of July 2008 through June 2009 to be
$946,949.83 with a "Combined Contribution" total of $422,322.52. Per the calculations shown, your Agency's
contribution is $163,768.34. Therefore, per the attached Invoice No. FC0000010865, please remit
$163,768.34 as payment for the full amount and mail to the following address. Please note that payment is
due within 60 days of receipt of invoice.
Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District
1995 Market Street
Riverside, California 92501 -1770
Attention: Accounts Receivable
Re: FY 2007 -2008 Cost Sharing Reimbursement
Regional Program Costs for Santa Margarita NPDES Permit
The District appreciates your continued cooperation and prompt response to this request. If you have any
questions concerning this matter, please feel free to call Jason Uhley at 951.955.1273 or Claudio dres at
951.955.8602.
Very truly y s rs,
RECEIVED
CITY OF TEMECULA
JAN 0 2009
an MANAGER
MAKECHEOK. PAY A3Li u.
R ;VERSIDE COUN' Y FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONS;ER \ATION DISTRICt
%S93 MARKET STREET
RNERSIDE, CA 92501
CITY OF TEMECULA
P.O. BOX 9033
TEMECULA CA 92589 -9033
For billing questions, please call 951 955 -1245
ATTN: FC -NR
STANDARD
SUBTOTAL:
County of Riverside
INVOICE
Page: 1
Invoice No: FC0000010865
Invoice Date: 12/30/2008
Customer Number: FC- 000576
Payment Terms: 30 Days
Due Date: 01/29/2009
Contact Person: Flood Control Accounts Receive
Inquiry Number: 951- 955 -1245
Line Adj Identifier Description Quantity UOM Unit Amt Net Amount
1 NPDES COST SHARING 1,00 EA 163,768.34 163,768.34
CUSTOMER NOTE: FY08 -09 NPDES COST SHARING FOR SANTA MARGARITA RIVER WATERHSED
679R9922 8 -9 -00980
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
163,768.34
Please Remit To: Invoice No: FC0000010865
Flood- Accounting -Rvrsd Invoice Date: 12/30/2008
Requestor Customer Number: FC- 000576
Flood Control
Accounting
1995 Market St AMOUNT DUE: 163,768.34
Riverside CA 92501
United States Enclosed:
163,768.34
Original
Agency
BAU's
Population
Weighted
FY08/09
Original Projected
Costs for FY08/09*
Invoiced
Costs for
FY08/09
Projected
costs for
FY09/10
Flood Control
N/A
N/A
N/A
$420,000.00
$415,000.00
$415,000.00
County
32,080
57,005
24.43%
$107,000.00
$114,595.46
$122,127.59
Murrieta
38,386
100,173
35.42%
$133,000.00
$143,958.72
$177,077.51
Temecula
49,342
101,057
40.15%
$169,562.49
$163,768.34
$200,794.90
Totals:
119,808
258,235
100.00%
$829,562.49
$837,322.52
$915,000.00
NPDES IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT COST SHARES FY08 /09 AND FY09 /10
These figures represent adjustments following the disbursement of estimated credits and debits from 07/08.
These figures represent adjustments following the disbursement of actual credits and debits from 07/08.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AGREEMENT
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Stormwater Discharge Permit
Implementation Agreement
San Diego Region
(Santa Margarita Drainage Area)
91463.1
This Agreement, entered into by the RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (the "DISTRICT the COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
(the "COUNTY and the CITIES OF MURRIETA and TEMECULA (the "CITIES establishes
the responsibilities of each party concerning compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System "NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System "MS4 Discharge Permit
(the "NPDES Permit") issued by the Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego
Region (CRWQCB -SDR) pursuant to Order No. R9- 2004 -001.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Congress in 1987 added Section 402(p) to the Federal Clean Water Act
(CWA) (33 U.S.C. §1342(p)); and
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires certain municipalities to obtain
NPDES Permits in order to discharge storm water from MS4s to waters of the United States; and
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) of the CWA requires operators of certain industrial
facilities to obtain NPDES Permits for storm water discharges associated with designated industrial
activities, including construction activities; and
WHEREAS, Section 402(p) further requires the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) to promulgate regulations for NPDES Permit applications; and
WHEREAS, EPA adopted such regulations in November 1990; and
WHEREAS, EPA delegated authority to the California State Water Resources
Control Board "SWRCB to administer the NPDES Permit process within the boundaries of the
State of California; and
WHEREAS, SWRCB has in turn delegated its NPDES permitting authority to the
California Regional Water Quality Control Boards to administer the NPDES Permit process within
the boundaries of their respective regions; and
MAR 1 2005 Il.c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
91463.1
WHEREAS, the jurisdiction of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board -San Diego Region "CRWQCB -SDR includes that portion of Riverside County known as
the Santa Margarita Region; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT was created to provide for the control of flood and storm
waters within the County of Riverside and is empowered to investigate, examine, measure, analyze,
study and inspect matters pertaining to flood and storm waters; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 2003, DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES submitted a
Report of Waste Discharge as an application to renew NPDES Permit No. CAS0108766; and
WHEREAS, the application for renewal of the NPDES Permit was submitted in
accordance with the provisions of the previous NPDES Permit (Order No. R9- 98 -02, NPDES No.
CAS0108766) which expired on November 8, 2003; and
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2004, CRWQCB -SDR adopted Order No. R9- 2004 -001 to
serve as Waste Discharge Requirements in accordance with Section 13263(a) of the California Water
Code and as an NPDES Permit pursuant to Section 402(p) of the CWA; and
WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit issued pursuant to Order No. R9- 2004 -001 meets
both the requirements of Section 402(p)(3)(B) of the CWA and those requirements issued under
CRWQCB -SDR discretionary authority in accordance with Section 402(a)(1)(B) of the CWA; and
WHEREAS, the NPDES Permit designates DISTRICT as "PRINCIPAL
PERMITTEE" and DISTRICT, COUNTY and CITIES as PERMITTEES'; and
WHEREAS, cooperation between PERMITTEES in the administration and
implementation of the NPDES Permit is in the best interest of PERMITTEES; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT is willing to utilize its staff to coordinate the activities of
PERMITTEES to facilitate compliance with the NPDES Permit and CWA requirements; and
WHEREAS, DISTRICT established the Santa Margarita Watershed Benefit
Assessment Area (the "BENEFIT ASSESSMENT pursuant to District Ordinance 14 on May 14,
1991 to offset the DISTRICT's program and administrative costs associated with the development,
implementation and management of the federally mandated NPDES Program and DISTRICT is
willing to use the BENEFIT ASSESSMENT funds to support DISTRICT's role as PRINCIPAL
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
91463.1
PERMITTEE and to support regional program costs to the extent that BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
funds are available; and
WHEREAS, PERMITTEES are to perform and /or execute certain activities
prescribed in the NPDES Permit that will benefit all parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows:
1. Incorporation of the NPDES Permit. The NPDES Permit issued to
PERMITTEES by CRWQCB -SDR pursuant to Order No. R9- 2004 -001 is attached to this
Agreement as Exhibit "A" and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and made a part of
this Agreement.
2. Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the parties shall
be as described in the NPDES Permit and reiterated as follows:
a. DISTRICT shall assume the responsibilities and meet the
requirements of the NPDES Permit by:
(1) Complying with Section M (Principal Permittee
Responsibilities), including providing COUNTY and CITIES
an opportunity to review and comment on the Watershed
Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), Watershed SWMP
Annual Report and any other reports prepared by the District
for the Permittees.
(2) Complying with Sections A through N (Prohibitions, Non
Storm Water Discharges, Receiving Water Limitations, Legal
Authority, SWMP, Development Planning, Construction,
Existing Development, Education, Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination Program, Watershed -Based Activities,
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Standard Provisions,
respectively), as they pertain to DISTRICT facilities and
operations, at no cost to COUNTY and CITIES.
(3) Coordinating watershed efforts specified in Provision K.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
91463.1
b. COUNTY and CITIES shall, at no cost to DISTRICT, assume the
responsibilities and meet the requirements of the NPDES Permit for
land area within their individual jurisdictions by:
(I) Complying with Sections A through N (Prohibitions, Non-
Storm Water Discharges, Receiving Water Limitations, Legal
Authority, SWMP, Development Planning, Construction,
Existing Development, Education, Illicit Discharge Detection
and Elimination Program, Watershed -Based Activities,
Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Standard Provisions,
respectively), as they pertain to COUNTY and CITIES
facilities and operations.
(2) Demonstrating compliance with NPDES Permit requirements
through timely implementation of the approved Individual
and Watershed SWMPs and any approved modifications,
revisions or amendments thereto.
(3) Providing to DISTRICT (on DISTRICT provided forms)
information needed to satisfy the reporting requirements as
described in the Provisions E, L and K or to respond to
information requests from the CRWQCB -SDR. COUNTY
and CITIES shall specifically:
(a) Submit their Individual SWMPs and data necessary to
prepare the Watershed SWMP and Receiving Waters
Monitoring Reports no later than September 15 of
each year.
(b) Provide information on existing MS4 facilities and/or
other data as it pertains to COUNTY or CITIES
facilities when requested by DISTRICT.
c. Public Education Program. On behalf of PERMITTEES, DISTRICT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-
91463.1
shall conduct public education activities on a regional basis that focus
on reducing pollution of Urban Runoff within the Santa Margarita
Region, including radio and print advertising, developing brochures,
and attending public events. DISTRICT shall also develop and
implement mechanisms to determine the effectiveness of the regional
public education program. The COUNTY and CITIES shall be
individually responsible for developing and implementing public
education programs targeted at individual communities or
stakeholders within their respective jurisdictions.
d. Monitoring Program. DISTRICT shall perform sampling of surface
water and urban runoff in accordance with the provisions of the
NPDES Permit Monitoring and Reporting Program (M &RP),
Provision H.A. The location of the sampling sites shall be determined
by PERMITTEES, subject to approval by CRWQCB -SDR. The
PERMITTEES shall be individually responsible for complying with
Provision 11.B of the M &RP. The DISTRICT shall also enter into a
contract with a local lab to provide analysis of water quality samples
collected under the M &RP for PERMITTEES. The contract shall be
used strictly for water quality samples collected to comply with
Provision II of the M &RP.
e. Consultant's Services. In the event DISTRICT requires the services
of a consultant or consultants to assist in preparing manuals,
developing programs or performing studies relevant to the entire
Santa Margarita Region, the cost of said consultant services shall be
shared by PERMITTEES in accordance with the cost sharing
provisions set forth in Section 3 of this Agreement. COUNTY and
CITIES shall be notified in writing of DISTRICT's request for
proposals from consultants, selection of a consultant, consultant's fee,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
91463.1
contract timetable and payment schedule, and be allowed the
opportunity to participate in decisions related to consultant's services.
f. Support for Regional Programs. The PERMITTEES shall jointly
provide funding for certain regional efforts that benefit the Santa
Margarita Region, including but not limited to: County
Environmental Health's Compliance Assistance Program; the County
Fire Department's Hazardous Materials Team; County Environmental
Health's Household Hazardous Waste and Antifreeze, Batteries, Oil
and Paint collection program; the DISTRICT's membership with the
California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) on behalf of
PERMITTEES; the DISTRICT's administration of Principal
Permittee duties, and other NPDES support activities as needed.
Where these programs are implemented countywide in support of
other NPDES permit regions, the DISTRICT shall estimate the
portion of the total cost of these regional programs that benefits the
Santa Margarita Region.
g. Regulation and Enforcement. COUNTY and CITIES shall be
responsible for the regulation and enforcement of local ordinances
and regulations within their respective jurisdictions to ensure
compliance with the NPDES Permit. This includes the exercise of
land use controls, the exercise of police powers and the enforcement
of ordinances that COUNTY or CITIES presently have adopted or
will adopt in the future.
3. Shared Costs. Costs for services to be performed in accordance with Sections
2.c., 2.d., 2.e. and 2.f of this Agreement shall be shared by the PERMITTEES in accordance with
the procedure specified below.
In December of each year of this Agreement the DISTRICT shall:
a. Estimate the costs of services specified in Sections 2.c., 2.d., 2.e. and
-6-
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
91463.1
2.f. for the upcoming fiscal year (ESTIMATED COSTS);
b. Estimate the DISTRICT's internal costs for developing, implementing
and administering the NPDES program in the Santa Margarita Region
as specified in 2.a. (INTERNAL COSTS); and
c. Estimate the revenues expected from the BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
program (the "ASSESSMENT REVENUES
d. Determine actual costs for NPDES programs administered in the
previous fiscal year.
e. Determine Credits or Debits (the "CREDITS" or "DEBITS due to
COUNTY and CITIES based on the difference of the actual
contributions from the previous fiscal year with the actual
contributions provided by the COUNTY and CITIES for that fiscal
year.
By February 1 of each year of this Agreement, the DISTRICT, CITIES and
COUNTY, through a NPDES representative assigned by the General Manager -Chief Engineer, City
Managers, and County Executive Office, respectively, shall approve, by majority vote, ESTIMATED
COSTS for the upcoming fiscal year.
3.1 DISTRICT Contribution
The DISTRICT contribution (the "DISTRICT CONTRIBUTION to programs
specified in Sections 2.c., 2.d., 2.e., and 2.f. for the upcoming fiscal year shall be determined using
the following formula:
DISTRICT CONTRIBUTION ASSESSMENT REVENUES INTERNAL
COSTS 20% ASSESSMENT REVENUE. 1
If the calculation yields a negative result, the DISTRICT shall have no contribution
for the upcoming fiscal year other than the INTERNAL COSTS it has incurred.
3.2 COUNTY and CITIES Contribution
1 District retains 20% of assessment revenue as a reserve for District's
administrative and program costs associated with the NPDES Permit pursuant to
RCFC &WCD Ordinance No. 14.
-7-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
b) the calculated
number of Benefit Assessment Units (BAU)
91463.1
The total shared COUNTY and CITIES contribution (the "COMBINED
CONTRIBUTION shall be determined using the following formula:
COMBINED CONTRIBUTION ESTIMATED COSTS DISTRICT
CONTRIBUTION
The COUNTY and individual CITIES respective pro rata share of the COMBINED
CONTRIBUTION (the "INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION) shall be determined on the basis of an
equally weighted average of population and Benefit Assessment Units within the Santa Margarita
Region of Riverside County. More specifically, such percentage contribution shall be calculated as
the equally weighted average of
a) the population of COUNTY or individual CITIES within the Santa Margarita
Region, divided by the total population of the COUNTY and CITIES in the Santa
Margarita Region and;
for COUNTY or
individual CITIES, divided by the total BAU for COUNTY and individual
CITIES.
The INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION shall be further adjusted by any CREDITS or DEBITS due
from the previous fiscal year.
The population of CITIES shall be determined by the latest California State
Department of Finance population figures issued in May of each year. COUNTY population shall
be based on the most current Tax Rate Area (TRA) information best fitting the NPDES PERMIT
area.
The BAU count of COUNTY and CITIES shall be estimated by comparing the most
current TRA information best fitting the NPDES PERMIT area with the Assessment Rolls from the
current fiscal year's BENEFIT ASSESSMENT Engineer's Report.
COUNTY and CITIES may generate credits toward payments due by providing labor
or services in lieu of cash payments. DISTRICT shall determine value of labor or services based on
ESTIMATED COSTS for the fiscal year.
Starting in Fiscal Year 2004 -2005, DISTRICT shall invoice COUNTY and CITIES
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
91463.1
for INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION in two installments. The first installment, for 50% of
INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTION, shall be prepared upon approval of this agreement, or after Fiscal
Year 2004 -2005, at the beginning of the fiscal year, by DISTRICT and paid within 60 days of receipt
of invoice from DISTRICT. The second installment, due for the balance of INDIVIDUAL
CONTRIBUTION, will be invoiced after January 1 of the current fiscal year and shall be paid by
April 30 or within 60 days of invoice from DISTRICT if received after March 1. The COMBINED
CONTRIBUTION for COUNTY and CITIES shall not exceed $500,000 annually under this
Agreement.
4. Term of the Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date
of execution by the last duly authorized representative of the PERMITTEES. The term of the
Agreement shall be indefinite or as long as required for compliance with the CWA, unless each of
the parties withdraws in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.
5. Additional Parties. Any City which incorporates after the date of issuance of the
NPDES Permit and/or after the date of execution of this Agreement may file a written request with
DISTRICT asking to be added as a party. Upon receipt of such a request, DISTRICT shall solicit
the approval or denial of PERMITTEES. If a majority of the PERMITTEES, each having one, co-
equal vote, approves the addition of the City, DISTRICT, on behalf of the PERMITTEES, will ask
CRWQCB -SDR to add the City to the NPDES Permit as an additional Permittee. Once the City is
made an additional PERMITTEE to the NPDES Permit, this Agreement shall be amended to reflect
the addition, and the City shall, thereafter, comply with all provisions of the NPDES Permit and this
Agreement. Upon execution of the amended Agreement, the City shall be responsible for the shared
costs discussed in Section 3 of this Agreement for the current and any subsequent budget year.
6. Withdrawal from the Agreement. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement
60 days after giving written notice to DISTRICT and CRWQCB -SDR. The withdrawing party shall
agree in such notice to file for a separate NPDES Permit and to comply with all of the requirements
established by CRWQCB -SDR. In addition, withdrawal shall constitute forfeiture of all of the
withdrawing party's share of the costs paid as described in Section 3. The withdrawing party shall
be responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of its withdrawal. The cost
-9-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1
91463.1
allocations to the remaining parties shall be recalculated in the following budget year.
7. Non compliance with Permit Requirements. Any party found to be in non-
compliance with the conditions of the NPDES Permit within its jurisdictional boundaries shall be
solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties. Common or joint penalties shall be calculated and
allocated between the affected parties in equal shares.
8. Amendments to the Agreement. Except as provided in Section 5, this Agreement
may only be amended by consent of all parties to this Agreement. No amendment to this Agreement
shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the duly authorized representatives of all
parties to the Agreement.
9. Authorized Signatories. The General Manager -Chief Engineer of DISTRICT, the
Chief Executive Officer of COUNTY and the City Managers of CITIES (or their designees) shall
be authorized to execute all documents and take all other procedural steps necessary to file for and
obtain an NPDES Permit(s) or amendments thereto.
10. Notices. All notices shall be deemed duly given when delivered by hand; or three
(3) days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid.
11. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of California. If any provision or provisions of this Agreement shall be
determined to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the
remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired hereby.
12. Consent to Waiver and Breach. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed
waived and no breach excused, unless the waiver or breach is consented to in writing, and signed by
the party or parties affected. Consent by any party to a waiver or breach by any other party shall not
constitute consent to any different or subsequent waiver or breach.
13. Applicability of Prior Agreements. This Agreement and the exhibits attached
hereto constitute the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter; all prior
agreements, representations, statements, negotiations and undertakings are superseded hereby.
14. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed and delivered in
any number of counterparts or copies (counterparts) by the parties hereto. When each party has
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other parties hereto, each counterpart shall be
deemed an original and, taken together, shall constitute one and the same Agreement, which shall
be binding and effective as to the parties hereto.
91463.1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as
of the date the last duly authorized representative executed it. This Agreement will only become
effective when fully executed by each of the parties hereto.
IVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
RECOMMENDE J F PRO AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
l
By
By C2
WARREN D. WILLIAMS MARIO ASHLEY, Chai an
General Manager -Chief Engineer District Board of Supervisors
Dated: 2/7/69
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
County Counsel
By By
DAVID H. K. HUFF, Deputy
Dated:
By
LA• ••••S
County Executive Officer
Dated:
JU:MHW:blj
01/03/05
ATTEST:
-12-
ATTEST:
NANCY ROMERO
Clerk to the ,Board
Deputy
(SEAL)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
B y
MARION ASHLEY, Chairman
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
NANCY ROMERO
Clerk to the Board
By�I.rGIXi
Deputy
(SEAL)
91463.1
+AR 1 2005
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of
the date the last duly authorized representative executed it. This Agreement will only become
effective when fully executed by each of the parties hereto.
By
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
General Manager -Chief Engineer
Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation
Dated
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN
C.�_.- hik ounsel
aw ay,_13 7.1(K,
rVID H. K. HUFF, Deputy
Dated: (Z- Z z e
By
LARRY PARRISH
County Executive Officer
Dated:
JU:MHW:blj
11/16/04
MENDED FOR APPROVAL:
MENDED FOR APPROVAL:
-13-
AND WA
By
JAMES A. VENABLE, Chairman
District Board of Supervisors
ATTEST:
Clerk to the
By
(SEAL)
By
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
SIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
Y ROMERO
Deputy
Y OF RIVERSIDE
91463.1
ROY WILSON, Chairman
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
NSERVATION DISTRICT
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bx X iV�YI, By
City Attorney May
ATTEST:
By
City Clerk
CITY OF MURRIETA
91463.1
Dated: -(p -O,3
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By
City Atto
e
Peter M. Thorson
Dated: 1 /244
91463.1
ITEM NO. 9
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
Sief
Paz,
42,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Herman Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Quitclaim portion of Wolf Creek Trail Park (APN 962- 580 -090) from City of
Temecula to Wolf Creek Development, LLC
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works, CIP
Monica Adamee, Property Agent, CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A PORTION OF
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 962- 580 -090 TO WOLF CREEK
DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR
PUBLIC PURPOSES OVER SAID PROPERTY
BACKGROUND: On February 3, 2001, The City of Temecula and S -P Murdy entered into a
Development Agreement that approved land use entitlements for the area commonly known as the
Wolf Creek Development. Pursuant to the Development Agreement, S -P Murdy conveyed a 0.33
acre parcel to the City, which is a small portion of the southern leg of the linear Wolf Creek Trail
Park which parallels the entire length of Wolf Creek Drive.
Standard Pacific Homes, operating as Wolf Creek Development, LLC, acquired the residential
components of the Wolf Creek Development from S -P Murdy and has been actively building homes
or working with other home builders to develop the residential properties. The Wolf Creek Specific
Plan required that the development provide entry monumentation and landscaping at the main
entrances. During the planning and design of the entry monuments, it was discovered that the 0.33
acre parcel S -P Murdy conveyed to the City as a portion of the linear park inadvertently conveyed
the very small piece of property on the corner of Wolf Valley Road Wolf Creek Drive South
needed for one of the entry monuments.
The design and construction of the linear park were completed assuming this portion of the property
was reserved for the entry monument, thus this transfer will not have an adverse impact on the
linear park or the adjacent fire station. Therefore, Staff recommends that the City quitclaim that
portion of the linear park to the developer, Wolf Creek Development, LLC. Wolf Creek
Development, LLC will, in turn, dedicate the property to the homeowners association. The
homeowners association will become the responsible partyforthe operation and maintenance of the
completed entry monument and landscaping. A blanket easement allowing the City to utilize the
property for public purposes as necessary and convenient is included in the quitclaim deed.
Council took a similar action transferring a small piece of the adjacent Fire Station property, on
November 14, 2006, when the City Council adopted a resolution quitclaiming that portion of APN
962- 010 -009 to Wolf Creek Development, LLC. The deed was recorded on April 27, 2007 as
Instrument No. 2007 0283842.
FISCAL IMPACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
None
1. Resolution No. 2009
2. Quit Claim Deed with Exhibit "A" and Plat labeled Exhibit "B"
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE QUITCLAIM OF A
PORTION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 962 -580-
090 TO WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND
RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES
OVER SAID PROPERTY
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE
AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula and S -P Murdy entered into a Development
Agreement dated February 3, 2001, and recorded on October 3, 2001 as Instrument
Number 2001 481 21 7 of Official Records of the County of Riverside "Development
Agreement and
WHEREAS, Wolf Creek Development, LLC acquired from S -P Murdy, LLC
portions of its interest in the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Development Agreement, S -P Murdy, LLC, the
underlying fee owner conveyed interest in real property, now identified as Assessor's
Parcel Number 962 -580 -090, by Grant Deed to the City; and
WHEREAS, as part of the conveyance of said real property interest, the
underlying fee owner inadvertently conveyed portions of Assessor's Parcel No. 962-
580 -090 described on the legal description and depicted on the map attached to the
Quitclaim Deed as Exhibits "A" and "B" respectively (referred to as the "Property
attached as Exhibit "1" hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, Wolf Creek Development, LLC, the current developer of the Wolf
Creek Development (the "Development Project needs the Property for monument and
related uses in connection with the Development Project approved pursuant to the
Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula hereby determines that it does not need the
real property interest for public purposes; and
WHEREAS, Wolf Creek Development, LLC has agreed to accept a quitclaim of
the Property for monument and related uses in connection with the Development
Project approved pursuant to the Development Agreement discussed above; and
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula shall reserve for itself, its successors and
assigns a blanket easement on, over and across the Property for public purposes,
which include, but are not limited to access, repair, drainage, utilities and all uses
necessary or convenient thereto over the Property.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby desires to quitclaim
to Wolf Creek Development, LLC the Property described in Exhibits "A" and "B" of the
Quitclaim Deed attached as Exhibit "1" hereto.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council approves that certain
"Quitclaim Deed" attached as Exhibit "1" hereto and authorizes the Mayor to execute the
Quitclaim on behalf of the City.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10 day of February, 2009
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10 day of February, 2009, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
Recording Requested by
and when recorded return to:
CITY OF TEMECULA
Attention: City Clerk
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT LLC,
A California Limited Liability Corp.
255 East Rincon Street, Suite 200
Corona, California 92879
Recording Fee: Exempt pursuant to
Government Code 6103 and 27383
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE
The undersigned grantor declare(s):
This Quitclaim Deed is for
Portions of APN 962 -580 -090
Documentary Transfer Tax is .00
computed on the full value of property conveyed, or
computed on the full value less the value of liens or encumbrances remaining thereon at the time
of sale.
QUITCLAIM DEED
This QUITCLAIM DEED is entered into between the CITY OF TEMECULA, ,a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor" and WOLF CREEK
DEVELOPMENT LLC, A California Limited Liability Corporation, hereinafter referred
to as "Grantee" and is effective as of February 10, 2009.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Grantor and S -P Murdy, LLC entered into a Development
Agreement dated February 3, 2001, and recorded on October 3, 2001 as Instrument
Number 2001- 481217 of Official Records of the County of Riverside (referred to below
as "Development Agreement which is incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said Development Agreement, Grantor
acquired certain real property interests for public purposes; and
WHEREAS, WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT, LLC acquired from S -P Murdy,
LLC its interest in and to said Development Agreement; and
915476 -3
WHEREAS, as part of the conveyance of said real property interests for public
purposes, Grantor had dedicated to it that certain real property in the City of Temecula,
County of Riverside, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "the Property"
identified as portions of Assessor's Parcel No. 962 580 -090, which is described on the
legal description and depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and `B" and
incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, as part of said conveyance, Grantee or Grantee's predecessor in
interest S -P Murdy, LLC inadvertently transferred to Grantor the Property that Grantee
needs to use for monument and related uses in connection with the Development Project
approved pursuant to the Development Agreement discussed above; and
NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor and Grantee hereby agree as follows:
For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, Grantor hereby REMISES, RELEASES AND QUITCLAIMS to Grantee
all of Grantor's right, title and interest in the Property described above located in the City
of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California and depicted on the map attached
hereto as Exhibit "B," which is incorporated herein by this reference, without
representation or warranty, express or implied, and subject to all matters of record and
any and all other matters affecting said Property.
Grantor, however, reserves for itself, its successors and assigns a blanket
easement on, over and across the Property for public purposes, which include, but are not
limited to access, repair, drainage, utilities and all uses necessary or convenient thereto.
Said blanket easement is congruent with the portion of APN 962 -580 -090 that is the
subject of this Quitclaim Deed, which is described and depicted on Exhibits "A" and "B"
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
915476 -3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, these presents are hereby signed this day of
February 2009.
915476 -3
ATTEST:
SUSAN JONES, MMC, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
PETER M. THORSON, City Attorney
GRANTOR
CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal
corporation
By:
GRANTEE
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT, LLC
By:
Title:
By:
Title:
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF LOT 89 OF TRACT 33124 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN
BOOK 415, PAGES 27 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF
RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF WOLF VALLEY ROAD
AND WOLF CREEK DRIVE S. AS SHOWN ON TRACT 29305 -1 AS SHOWN BY
MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 350, PAGES 65 THROUGH 78, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,
AND ON TRACT 29305 AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 378, PAGES 36
THROUGH 48, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA;
THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID WOLF CREEK DRIVE S., SOUTH
52 °05'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 37 °54'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF
33.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF WOLF CREEK DRIVE
S., SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, SOUTH 52 °05'35" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 57.00 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, NORTH 37 °54'25" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 22.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 52 °05'35" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 37 °54'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET TO THE
NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 89;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE, NORTH 52 °05'35" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 77.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 89;
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF LOT 89, SOUTH 37 °54'25"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 6.00 FEET;
11/25/2008 POR. LOT 89 Page 1 of 2
EXPIRATION DATE 9/30/09
11/25/2008
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THENCE ALONG WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 89, SOUTH 05 °54'06" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 28.30 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL CONTAINS 2,020 SQUARE FEET OR 0.046
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART
HEREOF.
ANTHONX' J. TERICH R.C.E. 21914 DATE
/1/_SX7
No. 21 914 li
E;`P, c!-
POR. LOT 89 Page 2 of 2
20 0 10 20
SCALE: 1
LOT "0" TH. 293054
54
P.O.C.
20
S52'05' 35 "E
5.00 W
�n
N
LOT 89 TR. 33124
M.B. 415/27 -39
T.P.O.B.
S52'05'35 'E 70.00'
�P
Peck wkil
w
WOLF CREEK PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
R/W
EXHIBIT "B"
WOLF VALLEY ROAD
SITE
MY OF TEMECULA PEN DEED
RECORDED DD °/010200 3 AS MST.
T.
NO. 2003-56223t OO L FDINAL
RECORDS OF RMWERSUE
COUNTY, CALMFORMA
N52'05'
77.00'
57.00'
S52'05' 35"E
370/36-46
WOLF CREEK
DRIVE S.
ITEM NO. 10
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
Sief
Paz,
42,
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract for Pavement Rehabilitation De Portola Road,
Project No. PW06 -10
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Deputy Director of Public Works CIP
Jon Salazar, Associate Engineer, CIP
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Award a construction contract for Project No. PW06 -10, Pavement Rehabilitation
De Portola Road, to Hardy Harper, Inc. in the amount of $1,161,000.00 and
authorize the Mayor to execute the contract;
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders up to 30% of the contract
amount, or $348,300;
3. Make a finding that the De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project is exempt
from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees.
BACKGROUND: On October 28, 2008, City Council approved the plans and
specifications and gave authorization to solicit construction bids for Project No. PW06 -10, Pavement
Rehabilitation De Portola Road.
The work for the De Portola Road Pavement Rehabilitation consists of reconstructing De Portola
Road between Jedediah Smith Road and Margarita Road. More specifically, the project will include
the following: the removal of existing pavement, construction of new roadway structural section
consisting of crushed aggregate base, an asphalt concrete base course and asphalt concrete final
course (overlay), raising of various facilities to grade, removal and replacement of asphalt concrete
dikes, removal of existing and construction of new storm drain pipes, catch basins and modification
of existing storm drain inlet/outlet conditions, traffic control, and installation of traffic striping,
pavement markers and legends and miscellaneous appurtenant work.
On Thursday, January 8, 2009, the City received fifteen bids. The bids were publicly opened and
read aloud. The results were as follows:
1
Hardy Harper, Inc.
1,161,000.00
2
R. J. Noble
1,233,707.25
3
Marathon General, Inc.
1,234,234.00
4
All American Asphalt
1,255,000.00
5
Imperial Paving Co., Inc.
1,275,744.40
6
Vance Corporation
1,298,198.50
7
Hazard Construction Co.
1,330,936.40
8
Hillcrest Contracting, Inc.
1,349,308.83
9
D &L Wheeler Enterprises
1,363,541.50
10
Wheeler Paving, Inc.
1,366,299.45
11
Ortiz Asphalt Paving Co.
1,407,292.23
12
Sequel Contractors, Inc.
1,455,108.83
13
R.J. Bullard Construction, Inc.
1,510,004.25
14
L.B. Civil Construction, Inc.
1,602,396.40
15
Alliance Streetworks, Inc.
1,663,013.83
The Engineer's Estimate for the project is $1,836,430. The project specifications allow for One
Hundred working days, which is an approximate duration of 5 months. In order to allow for
potentially required additional work due to unsuitable subgrade conditions that were encountered on
nearby projects and is expected to be found on this project, staff is requesting a an increased
contingency of 30
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found Hardy Harper to be the lowest responsible bidder.
Hardy Harper has public contracting experience and has completed similar projects for other
agencies.
The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County
Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in
some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western
Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to
abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy
adopted by Resolution 07 -04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed
by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP.
Beginning July 1, 2008 the RCA will require that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects
contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90 -days of construction contract award. Fees outside the
public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical
right -of -way improvements projects are 5% of construction costs. Projects funded by TUMF or
Measure A are exempt from MSHCP fees, as those programs contribute directly to the MSHCP.
The De Portola Pavement Rehabilitation Project involves reconstruction of an existing roadway,
entirely within the original road width, therefore there is no new disturbed area subject to the 5%
MSHCP fees, and the project is thus exempt.
FISCAL IMPACT: The project is included in the FY09 -13 CIP Budget and is funded with
Measure A and Federal Surface Transportation Program Local (STPL) funds. Adequate funds are
available in Account Number 210- 165 -656 -5804 for the contract amount of $1,161,000.00 plus the
30% contingency amount of $348,300 for a total encumbrance of $1,509.300.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Location
2. Project Description
3. Contract
co
N
CU
b
bf1
0
con
E
b
b
CU
.ii
O
s� O
U
it
E
0
o
co
A-1
rl
O O O O O
OOO
o
O O N N O
O 7r O
N M 00
00 64 64 64 69
64
64
64
54
6R
54
64 5R
00 0 0 0 co 0 O
O N M O OZ N 01
O oi v'l 00 N
00 N M 00 00 O\ --1
O O
.--i N N
•4 •4 •4 •4 64 64 •4. 64 •4
el O
4n rS. Or, 01
O, O O O
C--- 00 o0 00
•4 64 64 •4 •4
H
00
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW06 -90
PAVEMENT REHABILITATION DE PORTOLA ROAD
STPL 5459 (017)
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 10th day of February ,2009, by
and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY and
Hardy Harper, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITN ESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
1.a. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW06-
10, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION DE PORTOLA ROAD, STPL 5459 (017), Insurance
Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of
California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications (Latest Ed.) where
specifically referenced in the Plans and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of
the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW06 -10, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
DE PORTOLA ROAD, STPL 5459 (017). Copies of these Standard Specifications are
available from the publisher:
BNi Building News
Division of BNi Publications, Inc.
1612 South Clementine St.
Anaheim, California 92802
(714) 517 -0970
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provision, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW06-
10, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION DE PORTOLA ROAD, STPL 5459 (017).
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
6. PAYMENTS
PROJECT NO. PW06 -10, PAVEMENT REHABILITATION DE PORTOLA ROAD,
STPL 5459 (017)
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: One Million
One Hundred and Sixty One Thousand DOLLARS and No CENTS ($1,161,000.00),
the total amount of the bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed One Hundred
(100) working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by CITY.
Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by CITY.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
A. Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR'S
payment requests.
UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
B. Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90 of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one -year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
E. In accordance with Section 9 -3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
7 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be
granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. Within ten (10) calendar days of the
occurrence of such delay, CONTRACTOR shall give written notice to CITY. Within thirty
(30) calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, CONTRACTOR shall provide written
documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to CITY. CONTRACTOR'S failure to
provide such notice and documentation shall constitute CONTRACTOR'S waiver,
discharge, and release of such delay claims against CITY.
8. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California
Department of Industrial Relations' Internet Web Site at http: /www.dir.ca.gov.
The Federal minimum wage rates for this project as predetermined by the United States
Secretary of Labor are included in Exhibit "B" of the project specifications. Future
effective general prevailing wage rates which have been predetermined are on file with
the California Department of Industrial Relations and are referenced but not printed in the
general prevailing wage rates.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and if there is a
difference between the minimum wage rates predetermined by the Secretary of Labor and
the general prevailing wage rates determined by the Director of the California Department
of Industrial Relations for similar classifications of labor, CONTRACTOR shall pay not less
than the higher wage rate.
CONTRACTOR shall comply with the provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, DISTRICT,
and /or AGENCY its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries,
or death of persons (CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property,
arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the
operations conducted by CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising
through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
19. CONTRACT ASSURANCE. The CONTRACTOR or subcontractor shall not discriminate
on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The
CONTRACTOR shall carry out applicable requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26 in the award
and administration of DOT assisted contracts. Failure by the CONTRACTOR to carry out
these requirements is a material breach of contract, which may result in the termination of
this contract or such remedy, as recipient deems appropriate.
20. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
21. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of
a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his /her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor /consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest
would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section
1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
22. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Mailing Address:
Greg Butler
Deputy Director of Public Works
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
Street Address:
Greg Butler
Deputy Director of Public Works
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed
on the date first above written.
DATED:
DATED:
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Hardy Harper, Inc.
1312 E. Warner Avenue
Santa Ana, CA
(714) 444 -1851
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
By:
Print or type NAME
Print or type TITLE
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
CITY OF TEMECULA
By
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ITEM NO. 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: John Meyer, Director of Housing and Redevelopment
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Establishment and Appointment of Ad -Hoc Subcommittee Summerhouse Senior
Housing Development (at the request of Council Member Washington)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
1. Establish an ad -hoc subcommittee to assess the opportunities related to the
Summerhouse Senior Housing Development, and;
2. Appoint Council Members Roberts and Washington to serve on this ad -hoc
subcommittee.
BACKGROUND: The Summerhouse Senior Housing Development was entitled as a
110 -unit, owner occupied senior housing complex located at the northwest corner of Margarita and
Dartolo Roads. Construction on this project has been abandoned. Eight units were completed; six
additional units and the community room /pool facility have been partially completed. The purpose of
this ad -hoc committee will be to assess any opportunities the City and /or Agency may take to
facilitate the completion of this project.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: None.
ITEM NO. 12
ORDINANCE NO. 09 -01
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE SECTIONS 17.22.160 THROUGH 17.22.178,
INCLUSIVE, REVISING THE RANCHO PUEBLO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE (PDO -6) TO
REVISE THE USES ALLOWED FOR PLANNING AREA C
AND ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
PLANNING AREA C (PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA07 -0309)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine that:
A. The proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
was processed without a subsequent environmental review per the California
Environmental Quality Act due to a previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration.
B. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed
public hearing on December 17, 2008, to consider the proposed amendment at which
time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to the matter.
C. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing and due consideration of the proposed amendment, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 08 -56, recommending that the City Council
approve the proposed amendment to Title 17 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code.
D. On January 27, 2009, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly
noticed public hearing on the proposed amendment had the opportunity and did
address the City Council on these matters, and following receipt of all public testimony
closed the hearing.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council in approving the proposed
Municipal Code amendment in Planning Application Number PA07 -0309 hereby makes
the following additional findings as required by Section 17.01.040 "Relationship to
General Plan of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code are
allowed in the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the land
use map, or is described in the text of the General Plan;
R: /Ords 2009 /Ords 09 -01 1
The proposed amendment to PDO -6 is designed to provide development
standards for the Halcon Rojo Professional Office Complex and create Planning
Area C which will house the development. The amendment is necessary since
the PDO currently indicates that a ball field will be placed in the location of the
proposed Halcon Rojo site as part of Planning Area A. Medical and business
office space is already an allowable use by the PDO and Development Code. In
addition, the parcel is designated as Professional Office by the City of Temecula
General Plan.
B. The proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code
are in conformance with the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the
General Plan;
The proposed amendment to Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code have been
reviewed by all appropriate departments to ensure they are in conformance with
the goals, policies, programs and guidelines of elements of the General Plan.
C. The proposed use is to be established and maintained in a manner which
is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions contained therein;
The proposed amendment to PDO -6 has been reviewed by all appropriate
departments to ensure that it will be established and maintained in a manner that
is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable provisions contained
therein.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed project has been determined
to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is
exempt from further environmental review. The previously approved Mitigated Negative
Declaration was designed to examine a total of 315,374 square feet of allowable
building square footage for the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center (Planning Area B)
located on the east side of PDO -6. However, the Development Plan for the project was
only approved for 217,378 square feet of allowable building area. This left a remainder
of 97,996 square feet that was evaluated by the Mitigated Negative Declaration. 65,640
square feet of this remainder will be transferred to the newly proposed Planning Area C.
The uses within Planning Area B and the proposed Planning Area C are consistent with
each other. Given that the total square footage of PDO -6 will not be increased and the
uses remain consistent, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the
revised Ordinance will have a further significant effect on the environment from what
was already studied under the existing Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City Council
hereby finds that this Ordinance is exempt from additional requirements under the
California Environmental Quality Act "CEQA pursuant to Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, Section 15061 (b)(3).
Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Temecula
Municipal Code Sections 17.22.160 through 17.22.178, inclusive, Rancho Pueblo
R: /Ords 2009 /Ords 09 -01 2
Planned Overlay Zone (PDO -6), to read as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10 day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R: /Ords 2009 /Ords 09 -01 3
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 09 -01 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 27 day of January, 2009,
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27 day of February, 2009, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
R: /Ords 2009 /Ords 09 -01 4
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
RANCHO PUEBLO
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
OVERLAY (PDO -6)
Prepared for
CITY OF TEMECULA
Department of Community Development
Prepared by
Malkoff and Associates
18456 Lincoln Circle
Villa Park, CA 92861
(714) 288-6200
in collaboration with
James Benedetti, ASLA
Temecula Engineering Consultants
Timeless Architecture
September 24, 2002
Amended by
Lundstrom Associates
One Ridgegate Drive, Suite 210
Temecula, CA 92590
(951) 491-6690
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Table of Contents
17.22.160 TITLE 6
17.22.162 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 6
A. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY 6
B. VISION 6
C. PROJECT AREA 8
17.22.164 PLANNING AREAS 12
PLANNING AREA A RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH AND SCHOOLS 12
PLANNING AREA B RANCHO PUEBLO PROFESSIONAL CENTER 14
PLANNING AREA C HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER 16
17.22.166 LAND USES 18
A. USE MATRIX 18
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 30
17.22.168 CIRCULATION PLAN 32
A. ACCESS POINTS AND CONNECTIONS 32
B. ROADWAY DESIGN AND CROSS SECTIONS 34
C. TRUCK ACCESS 34
D. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 34
E. PARKING 36
F. SERVICE FACILITIES 37
1. Service, Loading and Delivery Areas 37
2. Trash 37
3. Storage 37
4. Utility Equipment 37
5. Mechanical Equipment 37
17.22.170 RECREATION FACILITIES 38
A. PLAYING FIELDS 38
B. HARD SURFACE PLAY AREAS 38
17.22.172 LANDSCAPING 39
A. GENERAL SITE STANDARDS 39
1. Highway 79 39
2. Rear (North) Property Line 42
3. Shared Mini Plazas 42
4. Parking Areas 42
5. Storm Drain Channel 46
6. Water District Easement on West Property Line 46
7. Temporary Ground Cover 46
8. Equipment and Service Areas Screening 46
B. STREETSCAPES 46
C. ENTRY FEATURES 53
September 24, 2008 2
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
D. PLAZAS DESIGNS ELEMENTS 53
E. PAVEMENT FINISHES 53
F. CITY STANDARDS 53
G. PLANT PALETTE 55
17.22.174 INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING 58
A. UTILITIES 59
B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE 59
17.22.176 DESIGN GUIDELINES 62
A. ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT 62
1. Form and Scale 62
2. Complexity and Unity 71
3. Architectural Elements 71
4. Materials and Finishes 76
5. Parking Structures 76
6. Drive -Thru 80
B. ACCENT ELEMENTS 80
1. Paving, Plazas and Walkways 80
2. Site Furniture 80
3. Fountains 80
4. Raised Planters 80
C. WALLS AND FENCES 84
1. Masonry Stucco 84
2. Three -Rail 84
3. Chain -Link 84
D. LIGHTING 84
1. Streets and Parking Areas 91
2. Pedestrian and Wall Mounted 91
3. Accent 91
4. Sports Fields 91
E. SIGNAGE 91
1. Monument 97
2. Building and Tenant Identification 97
3. Pedestrian- Oriented 99
4. Vehicular Directional Signage 99
5. Specialty 99
6. Sign Illumination 99
7. Commercial Wall Mounted Tenant Signs 99
17.22.178 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES 103
A. ADOPTION OF THE PDO 103
B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS 103
C. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 103
D. AMENDING THE PDO 103
E. EXPANSION OF THE PDO AREA 104
September 24, 2008 3
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
List of Figures
Figure 1 Vicinity Map 7
Figure 2 Study Area 9
Figure 3 PDO Area Map 10
Figure 4 Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan Church Schools 13
Figure 5A Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan Rancho Pueblo Professional Center 15
Figure 5B Conceptual Illustrative Land Use Plan Halcon Rojo Professional Center 17
Figure 6 Circulation Plan 33
Figure 7 Roadway Sections 35
Figure 8 Landscape Illustrations Key Map 40
Figure 9 Highway 79 Buffer 41
Figure 10 Rear Property Line Drainage Channel 43
Figure 11 Pedestrian Gathering Area 44
Figure 12 Pedestrian Corridor at Parking Area 45
Figure 13 Rancho Pueblo Entry 47
Figure 14 Rancho Pueblo Interior Section 48
Figure 15 Chapel Lane Entry 49
Figure 16 Chapel Lane Interior Section 50
Figure 17 Rancho Community Church Sign 51
Figure 18 Halcon Rojo Professional Center Entry 52
Figure 19 Main Church Gathering Plaza Plan 54
Figure 20 Grading Exhibit 60
Figure 21 Drainage Exhibit 61
Figure 22 Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 63
Figure 22A Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 64
Figure 22B Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 65
Figure 22C Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 66
Figure 22D Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 67
Figure 22E Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 68
Figure 22F Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 69
Figure 22G Exterior Architectural Aesthetics 70
Figure 33 Typical Entrance Detail 72
Figure 24A Secondary Entry Exit Cover B 73
Figure 25 Exterior Secondary Entry Exit Covers 74
Figure 25A Exterior Entry Exit Covers 75
Figure 26 Exterior Colonnade 77
Figure 27 Exterior Sloped Window Shade Covers 78
Figure 27A Window Detail 79
Figure 28 Typical Planter Integrated Seat 81
Figure 28A Typical Planter Integrated Seat Detail Photographic Example 82
Figure 29 Typical Fountain Detail 83
Figure 30 Stucco Wall Detail 85
Figure 31 Three Rail Fence Detail 86
September 24, 2008 4
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Figure 32A Parking Lot Driveway Lighting 87
Figure 32B Walkway, Plaza Parking Deck Lighting 88
Figure 32C Wall Mounted Lighting 89
Figure 32D Sports Field Lighting 90
Figure 33 Signage Plan 92
Figure 34 Signage 93
Figure 34A Signage 94
Figure 34B Under Canopy Signage 95
Figure 35 Church Signage Tower with Electronic Signage Feature 96
Figure 36 Commercial Wall Mounted Signage 98
List of Tables
Table 17.22.162 Rancho Pueblo Statistical Area Summary 11
Table I7.22.166A Matrix of Permitted Uses 18
Table 17.22.166B Development Standards 24
Table 17.22.172 Plant Palette 49
September 24, 2008 5
17.22.160 TITLE
Within the City of Temecula's Zoning Code (Title 17), Sections 17.22.160 through 17.22.178
shall be known as "PDO -6" (Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay District).
17.22.162 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6) helps define a vision for the
future development of Rancho Pueblo and serves as a guide to the implementation of that vision
over time. This document directs future development to adhere, appropriately, to the overall
PDO area vision, thereby ensuring that Rancho Pueblo fulfills its primary goal of positively
adding to the collective image of the City of Temecula.
Design excellence, coupled with efficient and safe, vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
provides an environment with pedestrian- friendly streetscapes and landscaped areas Special
attention will be given to providing architectural and landscape designs that are complementary
to the adjacent residential areas.
The Rancho Pueblo PDO project area is situated to the southeast of central Temecula, on
the north side of Highway 79 South, midway between the intersection with Margarita Road and
Jedediah Smith Road, approximately 1.5 miles east of the intersection with I -15 (Figure 1).
The PDO area is currently zoned Professional Office by the City of Temecula and falls
within the Zl Special Plan Overlay, as set forth in the City of Temecula General Plan. In
accordance with the requirements for a Special Plan Overlay, Rancho Pueblo will be a
comprehensively planned development with a complementary mix of uses. The underlying
zoning for the PDO area will remain as Professional Office, except as specifically modified
herein. In situations where the development guidelines herein do not specifically or completely
address an issue, the Temecula City Wide Design Guidelines will apply, so the development
guidelines herein are seen as an adjunct to, rather than a displacement of, the City Wide Design
Guidelines.
B. VISION
The name for "Rancho Pueblo" evolved from its origins in the Rancho Community
Church and its desire to evoke the look and feel of a village through provision of a more
traditionally based pedestrian- oriented environment, blended with the regional Spanish-
American heritage. Just as churches provide valuable community models for balancing stability
and growth to form the lasting cornerstones of our communities, Rancho Pueblo is to be a model
for a well planned, well- executed and cohesive plan. The presence of Rancho Community
Church on the project site will provide a guiding and stabilizing force to the entire development
and will provide a new landmark, both literally and figuratively, for the City of Temecula and the
entire Temecula Valley.
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Development Overlay PAOI -0522
Vicinity Map Figure 1.
September 24, 2008 7
The Project forms an attractive and complimentary addition to both the adjacent
neighborhoods and the City of Temecula as a whole, by knitting together a tapestry of
architectural, landscape, and urban design elements, complementary to the City of Temecula's,
City Wide Design Guidelines. The Rancho Pueblo PDO envisages a symbiotic assemblage of
possible uses, including a church and its associated administrative and ministerial structures,
church -based schools, community- accessible recreational facilities, professional offices, medical
support services, and support retail; other uses may include, assisted living and congregate care
facilities, and self storage facilities.
There is a strong emphasis placed on ease of access and pedestrian- friendly circulation
within the entire site. In general, parking lots are placed along the central backbone roadway
system, with a network of sidewalks, walking paths, and pedestrian corridors designed to
facilitate and encourage pedestrian movement, throughout the entire Rancho Pueblo PDO area.
The network of pedestrian pathways also connects handicapped- accessible parking areas to the
site buildings with additional external site linkages at appropriate points along Highway 79
South.
C. PROJECT AREA
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
The Project Area, shown in Figure 2, is defined as Tract Number 30798, Lots 1 through
16, and Tract Number 30797, Lots 1 through 8, totals approximately 53.62 acres and runs along
the Highway 79 frontage for approximately 3,700 feet. Site depth varies between approximately
430 and 730 feet from the right -of -way line.
The Project Area, collectively known as Rancho Pueblo, will be governed by this
Planned Development Overlay, subject to review and approval of the City of Temecula. It is to
be a high- quality, regional development, positively enhancing the overall image of the City of
Temecula. It consists of threesignificant and interrelated development areas, delineated as
Planning Areas A, B, and C in Figure 3. Planning Area A is the new home for the Rancho
Community Church and School, anchoring the site in the midwestern portion of the PDO area.
Planning Area B, the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, consists of professional offices,
support retail, retail, and other appropriate land uses, and occupies the eastern portion of the
PDO. Planning Area C, also known as the Halcon Rojo Professional Center, will also consist of
professional offices, support retail, retail, and other appropriate land uses.
A statistical summary of acreage for each of the proposed major development areas
within the PDO is presented in Table 17.22.162.
September 24, 2008 8
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
g
0
3
0.
September 24, 2008 10
Planning Area
Acreage
Square
Footage
Percentage
A. Rancho Community Church and Schools
Development Pad
4.61 ac
200,908
13.63
Landscaped Area, Hardscape and Walkways
12.08 ac
526,337
35.70
Public Streets Driveway (R.O.W. Only)
0.69 ac
30,152
2.04
Private Street /Driveway Easement
2.07 ac
90,260
6.12
Open Space (sports fields)
6 23 ac
271,534
18.41
Projected Parking Area (footprint only)
8.16 ac
355,353
24.10
Gross Acreage:
33.85 ac
1,474,544
100.00
Allowable Building square footage
852,457 sf
Total Projected Parking Spaces
1,451
B. Rancho Pueblo Professional Center
Development Pad
3.85 ac
167,812
26.60
Landscaped Area
4.72 ac
205,326
32.55
Public Streets Driveways (R.O.W. Only)
2.00 ac
87,347
13.85
Projected Parking Area (footprint only)
3.91 ac
170,264
27.00
Gross Acreage:
14.48 ac
630,815
100.00
Allowable Building square footage
315,374 sf
Total Projected Parking Spaces
392
C. Halcon Rojo Professional Center
Development Pad
0.78 ac
34,159
14.83
Landscaped Area
1.92 ac
83 547
36.27
Hardscape, Sidewalk and Walkways
0.54 ac
23,628
10.26
Projected Parking Area (footprint only)
2.04 ac
89,036
38.65
Gross Acreage:
5.29 ac
230,370
100.00
Allowable Building square footage
65,640 sf
Total Projected Parking Spaces
245
Rancho Pueblo PDO total gross acreage:
53.62 ac
2,335,729
Table 17.22.162 RANCHO PUEBLO STATISTICAL AREAS SUMMARY*
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Statistics shown, except those for gross acreage by site, are illustrative and subject to
revision during subsequent Site Development Plan approvals.
Additional 0.25 floor area ratio may be allowed based on enhanced landscape and /or
architecture in the PO zone. FAR's are slightly higher for retail and retail- support
areas
17.22.164 PLANNING AREAS
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Rancho Pueblo has threemajor components: the Rancho Community Church and Schools,
the Rancho Pueblo Professional Center, and the Halcon Rojo Professional Center. The Church
and Schools project contains worship, ministerial, meeting and educational facilities and
associated recreational amenities. The Professional Centers may consist of a combination of
professional services, support retail, a sports club and possibly congregate care or self storage
facilities. While the following descriptions of the Church and School, and the Professional
Centers are illustrative of a potential mix of uses, the fmal complexion of the PDO area will be
governed by the Matrix of Permitted Uses (see Table 17.22.166A) and subject to the City of
Temecula Site Development Plan Review process.
PLANNING AREA A RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH AND SCHOOLS
Expected uses for the Rancho Community Church and Schools site include:
1. Religious worship spaces
2. Church administration offices
3. Church ministries and program areas
4. Preschool
5. Elementary school
6. Junior High and High Schools
7. Indoor recreation
8. Recreational playing fields
9. Outdoor hard- surface recreation areas
10. Associated parking areas structured and at -grade
11. Caretaker residences
The Church and its associated phased structures are organized, village style, around a
central gathering place, functioning both as a forecourt for the Worship Center and as a place of
respite and contemplation for its multiple associated users. The Worship Center, the major,
central building of the Church complex, is situated directly on the main gathering place, towards
the front of the site to help decrease potential visual impacts, of this lie footprint structure, on
the residential areas to the rear of the site, and to increase the building's presence on Highway 79
South. The gathering place is further bounded by the Adult Education building, the Chapel and
the Family Life Center; the Family Life Center also functions in the early years as the Interim
Worship Center. These buildings, in turn, are bracketed by the Preschool, Elementary, Junior
High and High School buildings, with the western and eastern ends of the site containing
recreational playing fields. Figure 4 illustrates a representative development plan for the site.
The only buildings not directly associated with the central gathering place are the
Administration building, located close to Highway 79 South, and the two Field Houses adjacent
to the east and west sports fields. The Administration Building development pad extends from
Chapel Lane to Highway 79 South, adjacent to the Rancho Pueblo Road main site entry, but it is
September 24, 2008 12
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
IMO MOO
11 3
v.p H.
13
t
pima
0 H 0 N V L
N
13
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6)
accessed from within the Church and Schools site, via Chapel Lane. Depending on Church,
office space requirements, this building may accommodate multi- tenant, non Church related
uses.
Efficient use of land is maintained throughout the site by use of sharing of reciprocal
parking between the Church and non Church uses, with the overriding and dominant peak
demand being weekend worship services. Temporary modular units are allowed for interim
school uses. Such units must have landscaping to soften views of the modulars from off -site
areas, and must be phased out over time. Construction trailers are allowed, without landscaping.
PLANNING AREA B RANCHO PUEBLO PROFESSIONAL CENTER
The site may contain a well coordinated mix of professional office and other use types,
including:
1. Medical and Professional Office
2. Self storage facilities
3. Assisted Living facilities
4. Senior Living facilities
The site is organized around the central main street, Ranch Pueblo Road, which traverses
the middle of the site, from its western terminus at Highway 79, shared with the Rancho
Community Church and Schools site to the west, to its interim eastern terminus at the PDO
eastern boundary; secondary access is also provided via the right -in right -out road connecting to
Highway 79 at the eastern boundary of the site. In addition, a connection for Rancho Pueblo
Road to the east is provided in Planning Area B.
Development parcels are located along and accessed from Rancho Pueblo Road, which
bisects the site in an east -west direction. Some access may also be provided, at a suitable
distance from Highway 79, from the right -in, right -out access road connecting to Highway 79, at
the eastern end of the site. Parcels along Highway 79 have their front yards, with appropriate
setbacks, designated along Highway 79, while the parcels to the rear of the site front onto
Rancho Pueblo Road.
Main entries of buildings, especially those along the Highway 79 frontage, will be
oriented towards the interior of the site to keep the amount of parking on the exterior boundaries
of the site to a minimum. Buildings fronting onto Highway 79 will be variably setback and
spaced along the right -of -way line to provide a combination of visually interesting relationships
with respect to access and movement of vehicles and pedestrians within the site. Whenever
possible, cluster groups or pairs of buildings around shared, central courtyards to promote a more
village -like atmosphere. Figure 5A illustrates a representative development pattern, while Figure
11 (see Section 17.22.172.A.3), illustrates how the shared landscaped areas can as pedestrian
gathering places, serving adjacent buildings.
September 24, 2008 14
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
15
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
PLANNING AREA C HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER
The site may contain a well coordinated mix of professional office and other use types,
including:
1. Medical and Professional Office
2. Healthcare facilities
3. Pharmacy
The site is organized around the project entrance from Highway 79 at the southeast
corner of the site; secondary access is provided from the adjacent sports field driveway also in
the southeast corner of the site. The project entry is right -in, right -out from Highway 79.
The professional office buildings will be clustered in the center of the site, with parking
areas located around the perimeter of the site as illustrated in Figure 5A. The main entries of the
buildings will be oriented towards a central entrance courtyard and vehicular roundabout area.
The circular driveway, or roundabout, will also be used as a drop -off or loading area for patients.
Commercial loading areas shall be provided for each building and shall be located in proximity
to the building it serves. Buildings fronting onto Highway 79 will be variably setback and
spaced along the right -of -way line to provide a combination of visually interesting relationships
with respect to access and movement of vehicles and pedestrians within the site. Whenever
possible, cluster groups or pairs of buildings around shared, central courtyards to promote a more
village -like atmosphere. Figure 11 (see Section 17.22.172.A.3), illustrates how the shared
landscaped areas can act as pedestrian gathering places, serving adjacent buildings.
September 24, 2008 16
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 17
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES
A
Adult business subject to Chapter 5.08 of Temecula Municipal Code
Aerobics dance /gymnastics /jazzercise /martial arts studios
(less than 5,000 sq. ft.)
C
Aerobics /dance /gymnastics /jazzercise /martial arts studios
(greater than 5,000 sq. ft.)
C
Affordable Housing
C
Airports
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities
C
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient)
P
Alcoholic beverage sales
Ambulance services
Animal hospital/shelter
Antique restoration
Antique sales
Apparel and accessory shops
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances)
Arcades (pinball and video games)
Art supply stores
Auction houses
Auditoriums and conference facilities
C
Automobile dealers (new and used)
Automobile sales (brokerage)- showroom only (new and used) -no
outdoor display
Automobile repair services
Automobile rental
Automobile painting and body shop
Automobile salvage yards /impound yards
Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash
Automotive oil change /lube services with no major repairs
Automotive parts -sales
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine with or without an
automated car wash
17.22.166 LAND USES
A. USE MATRIX
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
The land uses listed in the following table will be permitted in the Rancho Pueblo
Planned Development Overlay (RPPDO), only as indicated. Where indicated with a letter "P"
the use will be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use will be conditionally permitted
subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Where indicated with the symbol the use
is prohibited within the Rancho Pueblo PDO Area.
September 24, 2008 18
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (con't)
B
Bakery, goods distribution
Bakery, retail
P
Bakery, wholesale
Banks and financial institutions (without drive -thru lanes)
P
Banks (with drive -thru lanes)
C
Barber and beauty shops
P
Bed and Breakfast
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services)
Billiard parlor /pool hall
Binding of books and similar publications
P
Blood bank
P
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services
P
Bookstores
P
Bowling alley
Building material sales (with exterior storage /sales areas greater than 50
percent of total sales area)
Building material sales (with exterior storage /sales areas less than 50
percent of total sales area)
Butcher shop
C
Cabinet shop
Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq. ft. no outdoor storage
Camera shop (sales /minor repairs)
Candy/confectionery sales
P
Car wash, full service
Carpet and rug cleaning
Caretaker residences
C
Catering services
Clothing sales
P
Coins, purchase and sales
Cold storage facilities
Communications and microwave installation
C
Communications equipment sales
P
Community care facilities
P
Computer sales and servicing
P
Congregate care housing for the elderly
P
Construction equipment sales, service or rental
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental
Convenience market
Costume rentals
Crematoriums
Cutlery
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 19
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (con't)
D
Data processing equipment and systems
P
Day care centers
P
Delicatessen
P
Discount/department store
Distribution facility
Drug store /pharmacy
P
Dry cleaners
P
Dry cleaning plant
E
Emergency shelters
C
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage)
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage)
F
Feed and grain sales
Financial, insurance, real estate offices
P
Fire and police stations
P
Floor covering sales
Florist shop
p
Food processing
Fortune telling, spiritualism, or similar activity
Freight terminals
Fuel storage and distribution
Funeral parlors, mortuary
Furniture sales
Furniture transfer and storage
G
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service
Gas distribution, meter and control station
General merchandise /retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft.
Glass and mirrors, retail sales
Governmental offices
P
Grocery store, retail
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales
H
Hardware stores
Health and exercise clubs
C
Health food store
C
Healthcare facility
P
Heliports
Home and business maintenance service
Hospitals
C
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 20
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (cony)
I
Ice cream parlor
P
Impound yard
Interior decorating service
P
J
Junk or salvage yard
K
Kennel
L
Laboratories (film, medical, research or testing centers)
C
Laundromat
Laundry service (commercial)
Libraries, museums and galleries
C
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution
Liquor stores
Lithographic service
Locksmith
P
M
Machine shop
Machinery storage yard
Mail order businesses
P
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the following.
Custom -made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods within enclosed building
(no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing,
assembling, and repair processes that do not involve frequent track traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication ofmaterials and
products That require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and
warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and
wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi refined products requiring further processing or
manufacturing, and outside storage.
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage
Medical equipment sales /rental
P
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges
C
Mini- storage or Mini warehouse facilities°
C
Mobile home sales and service
Modular Classrooms /buildings
C
Motion picture studio
Motorcycle sales and service
Movie theaters
Musical and recording studio
N
Nightclubs /taverns /bars /dance club /teen club
Nurseries (retail)
Nursing homes /convalescent homes
C
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 21
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (con't)
0
Office equipment/supplies, sales /services
P
Offices, professional services with Less than 50,000 sq. ft., including, but
not limited to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic,
architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance
P
P
Paint and wallpaper stores
Parcel delivery services
Parking lots and parking structures
C
Pawnshop
Personal service shops
P
Pest control services
Pet grooming /pet shop
Photographic studio
P
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed)
Postal distribution
Postal services
P
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.)
C
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission)
P
Q
Reserved
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices
P
Radio /television transmitter
Recreational vehicle parks
Recreational vehicle sales
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building
C
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage exterior yard
Recycling collection facilities
Recycling processing facilities
Religious institution, without day care or private school
C
Religious institution, with a private school
C
Religious institution, with day care
C
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial or
industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business)
C
Residential, multiple- family housing
Restaurant, drive in/fast food
Restaurants and other eating establishments
P
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
Retail support uses
P
Rooming and boarding houses
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 22
Table 17.22.166A RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (con
S
Scale, public
Schools, business and professional
C
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12)
C
Schools, religious (kindergarten through Grade 12; and, seminary)
C
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories
C
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)
P
Solid waste disposal facility
Sports fields (with or without related school use)
C
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent building
Swap Meet, outdoor
Swimming pool supplies /equipment sales
T
Tailor shop
P
Taxi or limousine service
Tile sales
Tobacco shop
Tool and die casting
Transfer, moving and storage
Transportation terminals and stations
Truck sales /rentals /service
TV /VCR repair
U
Upholstery shop
V
Vending machine sales and service
W
Warehousing /distribution
Watch repair
P
Wedding chapels
C
Welding shop
Welding supply and service (enclosed)
Y
Reserved
Z
Reserved
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Notes:
1. All antennas will be masked or incorporated into approved structures or other
surfaces, subject to City Design Review and City Antenna Ordinance.
2. All congregate care and senior housing residential projects will use the development
and performance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions
contained in City of Temecula Zoning Code Section 17.06.050.H.
3. See City of Temecula Zoning Code Section 17.080.050(R), special use regulations
and standards for self- storage or mini warehouse facilities.
September 24, 2008 23
Development Standard
PDO -6
Minimum gross acreage per Planning Area
5 acres
Target floor area ratio
0.25
Maximum floor area ratio (including bonuses)
0.50
Front yard adjacent to street:
80 feet
Highway 79 South
20 feet
Rancho Pueblo Road
20 feet
Chapel Lane
20 feet
Other Service and Access Roads
10 feet
Front Yard adjacent to residentially zoned property
25 feet
Interior side yard
10 feet
Rear yard
10 feet
Accessory structure side /rear yard setback
5 feet
Minimum building separation:
One story
15 feet
Two stories
20 feet
Maximum building height:
Two stories
40 feet'
Large meeting hall/auditorium structures (with high
ceiling single story portions to their structures)
45 feet
Parking Structures
45 feet
Temporary modular buildings
15 feet
Maximum percent of lot coverage
50 percent
Minimum required landscape open space (including
hardscape and walkways)
25 percent
Development Standard
Development on single lot
Minimum net lot area
40,000 square feet
Target floor area ratio
0.50
Maximum floor area ratio (including bonuses)
1.00
Minimum width at required front setback area
80 feet
Minimum depth
120 feet
Minimum frontage on street
60 feet
Front yard adjacent to street:
Highway 79 South
20 feet
Rancho Pueblo Road
20 feet
Chapel Lane
20 feet
Other Service and Access Roads
10 feet
Front Yard adjacent to residentially zoned property
25 feet
B. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table 17.22.166B RANCHO PUEBLO PDO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
24
Interior side yard
10 feet
Rear yard
10 feet
Accessory structure side /rear yard setback
5 feet
Minimum building separation:
One story
15 feet
Two stories
20 feet
Maximum building height:
Two stories
40 feet'
Large meeting hall/auditorium structures (with high-
ceiling single story portions to their structures)
45 feet
Temporary modular buildings
15 feet
Parking Structures
45 feet
Maximum percent of lot coverage
50 percent
Minimum required landscape open space (including
hardscape and walkways)
25 percent
Fence, hedge or wall maximum height
6 feet
Accessory building maximum height
15 feet
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Table 17.22.166B RANCHO PUEBLO MATRIX OF PERMITTED USES (con't)
Notes:
1. All structures except Worship Center, Chapel, Family Life Center (containing high ceiling,
single story spaces) and Parking Structure.
2. For purposes of this PDO document, Worship Center, Chapel, Family Life Center (containing
high ceiling, single story spaces) and Parking Structure fall into this category.
3. Parking structures of two stories.
September 24, 2008 25
17.22.168 CIRCULATION PLAN
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
A. ACCESS POINTS AND CONNECTIONS
In total, there are four vehicular access points into the PDO along Highway 79, with a
fifth (future) access point planned to the east, directly onto Margarita Road, through the easterly
adjacent parcel, which is outside of this PDO (Figure 6). The major, centrally located, PDO
entry point is at Rancho Pueblo Road, opposite Avenida De Missiones (presently known as
Constance B), with a second access point, directly into the Church and Schools site at Chapel
Lane, presently Constance A; both these intersections are planned to be full- movement and
signalized. There are two additional secondary access points, limited to right-in/right-out
movements only, at the eastern and western ends of the PDO, providing access directly to the
Rancho Pueblo Professional Center and the Halcon Rojo Professional Center /Rancho Pueblo
Sports Center respectively; these intersections will not require traffic signals.
Circulation for the PDO area centers along Rancho Pueblo Road, which acts as the
symbolic thoroughfare for the development, forming a central element about which various
building clusters are organized and from which they are accessed. Access to all the development
parcels is gained from this street, which runs from the main PDO entry at the intersection with
Highway 79 South, opposite Avenida De Missiones, via an internal site traffic circle, to the
easternmost boundary of the PDO area.
Within the PDO Area, Rancho Pueblo Road terminates at this eastern boundary, but
allows for its future extension through the property immediately to the east, and thence, via
connection to Dartolo Road, through to Margarita Road north of its intersection with Highway
79 South. The property immediately to the east of the PDO eastern boundary also falls under the
Z2 overlay designation and will be required, by the City of Temecula, to have similar
development patterns as those established herein and to continue Rancho Pueblo Road to connect
across to Dartolo Road. Rancho Pueblo Road then provides, in its fully completed form, a
parallel reliever road to Highway 79, for site traffic wishing to enter and leave the site headed to
and from Margarita Road and Redhawk Parkway.
By far the most dominant element of the PDO is the Rancho-Community Church and
Schools site, which occupies the majority of acreage within the PDO. It is accessed via, and
located along, Chapel Lane, which itself runs from Highway 79 South at what is presently
Constance A, to its intersection with Rancho Pueblo Road at the traffic circle within the PDO
area. Chapel Lane then serves as a meandering backbone for the Church and Schools campus,
connecting the main buildings and pedestrian spaces with their associated parking areas and site
entries. The street will be curvilinear, generally reducing vehicular speeds across the site,
particularly adjacent to the school buildings and drop -off zones which are, in turn, appropriately
separated and placed close to their respective schools.
September 24, 2008 26
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
erT
I1I11 A I p 11
0 0 0 W i o f
<0a 0 W I.o a
September 24, 2008 27
C. TRUCK ACCESS
D. PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
A secondary internal site road extends northerly from Chapel Lane west of its
intersection with Rancho Pueblo Road, along the northern site boundary, and terminates again on
Chapel Lane to the west of the Campus buildings, providing access and service to the rear
portion of the site.
New internal site roads named within the Rancho Pueblo PDO are subject to City site
plan reviews and approvals.
B. ROADWAY DESIGN AND CROSS SECTIONS
Design of site roadways adequately accommodates anticipated associated traffic volumes
in accordance with the recommendations of the Traffic Impact Analysis. Figure 7 shows the
individual roadway sections, while Section 17.22.172.B describes street landscaping details.
Trucks requiring access to the PDO predominantly consists of trash pick -up, service and
delivery vehicles, with special event and moving vehicles entering on a less frequent basis.
Truck access is via the main site entries along Highway 79, at both Rancho Pueblo Road and
Chapel Lane, and then, in the case of the Church and Schools campus, from these roads onto a
rear service road that loops around the buildings along the northern property line (Figure 6). In
the case of the non Church development, individual development parcels and buildings are
accessed and serviced from Rancho Pueblo Road through individual site driveways and parking
aisles.
Clearly defined pedestrian pathways will facilitate pedestrian movement across and
throughout the PDO area. Situated along streets and connecting with building areas, these
pathways will be a combination of naturally and architecturally shaded walkways, small intimate
seating areas, building arcades and connections to building entries, all designed to promote and
encourage pedestrian use. Small "gathering" and seating areas will be placed in conjunction
with pedestrian pathways either at the intersection of pedestrian pathways with other pathways
and roadways, or adjacent to buildings. Locate and design these "gathering" areas in a
contemplative, "oasis" style, promoting a restive quality to their use (see Figure 11 in Section
17.22.172.A.3).
Main pedestrian access pathways traverse the PDO area, parallel to, and adjoining,
Rancho Pueblo Road, and connecting through the Church and School site along Chapel Lane, to
the recreation area and the Halcon Rojo Professional Center to the west (see Pedestrian Path on
Figure 6). A system of landscaped, pedestrian- friendly, feeder paths will connect the major east
west pathways with the Church and School's central gathering place and with all of the
associated buildings, parking and recreation areas. They will also connect, through the parking
areas, to the individual buildings or groups of buildings along Highway 79 and will be developed
as part of individual building sites, also allowing for connection between buildings via the shared
landscape areas (see Figure 11 in Section 17.22.172.A.3).
September 24, 2008 28
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
u.
September 24, 2008 29
Pedestrian entry to the PDO Area from the sidewalk along Highway 79 may be provided
at each vehicular traffic entry point and at suitable points in between. Additional pedestrian
connections will be developed within and between adjacent land uses, and allow for future
extension into the development immediately east of the PDO.
Internal, site pedestrian pathways may only cross the main entry roadways at the interior
intersection of Rancho Pueblo Road and Chapel Lane, and at the intersection of Rancho Pueblo
Road and the secondary right in/right -out access road at the eastern site boundary Additional
crossings at the intersection of these roads with Highway 79 and within the landscape buffer
zone alongside Highway 79 are permissible, but no crossings are permitted in between the
Highway 79 landscape buffer zone and the major internal road intersections. Textural and/or
colored surface changes will identify all pedestrian roadway crossing points
The main pedestrian area in the PDO, the Church and School's central, gathering place, is
designed with both hard surface and soft surface landscaping and furniture elements, affording a
variety of open and shaded pedestrian environments. Both larger informal outdoor gatherings,
such as after Church services, and small, intimate settings for conversation and relaxation will be
accommodate in the design; the anticipated future Sanctuary capacity of some 3,500 people must
also be accommodated in this gathering place.
Access to parking is from Rancho Pueblo Road and secondary site internal roadways
using a minimal number of entry points, promoting pedestrian movements along the street -side
pedestrian pathways throughout the PDO.
E. PARKING
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Parking areas will be provided throughout the PDO reasonably close to the use that they
serve, with opportunities for shared and reciprocal parking arrangements encouraged to lessen
the total amount of land devoted to parking. Along the Highway 79 South frontage and at the
rear of the site, where the site abuts existing residential areas, parking will be kept to a minimum.
Standard and van- accessible handicapped- accessible parking and bicycle stands will be provided
at convenient locations throughout the site, especially adjacent to the School buildings and
Worship Center.
Access to parking areas is directly from Rancho Pueblo Road, Chapel Lane or the
secondary service driveways at points that minimize potential interference with cars traveling on
Rancho Pueblo Road and Chapel Lane (see Figures 4 5). Entry roads from Highway 79 South
will be designed with circulation and stacking distances in mind, avoiding any potential back -ups
and other adverse impacts on the public highway. Internal parking area driveways will provide
direct vehicular access in close and obvious proximity to the main building entries that they are
serving. Sharing of parking driveways between adjacent land use is encouraged.
Soften the impacts of parking areas through use of shade trees and appropriate ground
plantings that are integrated with clearly delineated, landscaped, pedestrian pathways, providing
people with direct links to the buildings (See Landscape Section 17.22.172.A.4).
September 24, 2008 30
2. Trash
Parking structures up to two stories above -grade are permitted, provided they are
architecturally integrated with the other site buildings, designed to minimize their visual impact,
and meet the landscape requirements of the PDO design guidelines. There is no limitation on the
number of parking levels allowable below grade. Parking structure faces will be articulated to
help reduce the visual impression of the structure. Landscape planter elements will be integrated
directly into the architectural design.
F. SERVICE FACILITIES
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO 6)
1. Service, Loading and Delivery Areas
Location and orientation of service areas and other loading and delivery facilities will
keep visual and noise impact to a minimum. They will be walled and screened from view from
outside the site and from major internal pedestrian routes and gathering places within the site.
Plantings adjacent to the walls to deter defacement of the walls are encouraged.
Location and orientation of trash collection facilities will keep visual and noise impact to
a minimum. They will be walled and screened from view from outside the site and from major
internal pedestrian routes and gathering places within the site. Walls will be masonry with
additional structural elements, such as wooden trellises, used to block view over the walls. Place
plantings adjacent to the walls to deter defacement of the walls. Use concrete stress pads in front
of enclosures to decrease wear on pavement surfaces.
3.. Storage
Outdoor storage is permitted only in areas specifically designed for that use. Fully screen
such areas in a manner consistent with service areas. No service, loading or delivery areas may
be used for storage.
4. Utility Equipment
Utility equipment will be placed in portions of buildings specifically designed for that
purpose or placed underground. Where aboveground placement is unavoidable, place equipment
in groupings and screen with walls and landscaping consistent with service areas (Landscape
Section 17.22.172.A.8, below).
5. Mechanical Equipment
Place mechanical equipment only in areas within buildings specifically designed for that
use. When unavoidably necessary to place equipment on roofs ensure screening of equipment
from off -site views by structures integrally designed to blend into the building design.
September 24, 2008 31
17.22.170 RECREATION FACILITIES
A. PLAYING FIELDS
Layout and design of playing fields will conform to City of Temecula, Parks and
Recreation Department standards. Field orientation will account for sun angles, lighting patterns
and keeping adjacent residential area impacts to a minimum (see Figure 4).
B. HARD- SURFACE PLAY AREAS
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
In recognition of the Schools' needs for both soft- and hard surfaced play areas, a portion
of various parking lots within the Church and Schools site may be utilized as hard- surface play
areas. These areas will be coned -off or gated to exclude vehicles when in recreational use.
Accordingly, parking areas designated to double as hard-surface play areas will meet special in-
lot landscaping requirements allowing for larger, unbroken open areas to accommodate court
markings. Additional plantings within island planters and peripheral landscape areas will instead
be used to soften views of these hard- surface play areas. Conversely, some areas designated as
hard- surface play areas will be alternately used for parking during peak parking periods when not
required for recreational use (see Figure 4).
September 24, 2008 32
17.22.172 LANDSCAPING
Landscaping will be a coordinated design element integrated with, and complementary
to, building design. Functioning on both experiential and esthetical levels, landscaping will
experientially enhance pedestrian pathway usage by providing shade and a range of textures,
patterns, and colors, and aesthetically enhance visual experiences from the interior and exterior
of both individual buildings and the entire PDO area.
Major landscaping elements, such as trees and monuments, will highlight specific areas
within the PDO, with accent trees similarly encouraged as visual clues to peoples' location
within the PDO area. A mix of deciduous and evergreen plantings is encouraged to highlight
seasonal changes while still maintaining year -round beauty and accent, with attention paid to
color, form and scent.
All exterior boundaries of the PDO area will be landscaped with multi- storied plantings.
Special attention will be given to the interface with the surrounding residential areas where
plantings and landscape design will emphasize softening the visual impact of the PDO area from
off -site.
A. GENERAL, SITE STANDARDS
1. Highway 79
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Buffers along Highway 79 within the PDO area will continue the precedent patterns
established by existing and proposed adjacent developments to the east of the PDO area along
Highway 79 South, namely a 36 -foot minimum landscape buffer, measuring 20 feet from the
property line and 16 feet from the curb to the right -of -way line. Exceptions to this buffer will be
for entry signage and monuments at points of access for vehicles and pedestrians, where the
buffer incorporates a greater area and depth.
Typically, the buffer includes a six-foot wide meandering sidewalk, not less than five feet
from the face of the curb along Highway 79 except at and approaching corners (Figures 8 and 9)
To address measurable highway and vehicular noise and to promote a quiet, restive ambiance
within the Church and School's main areas, a variable two -to -four foot high, shallow- sloped
berm (4 -foot maximum height for berm) will be topped with an articulated four -to six foot high
wall (6 -foot maximum height for walls/fences along Highway 79 South), to deflect highway
noise and screen parking lot views from Highway 79.
The berm and wall relative heights are varied for visual interest when experienced from
Highway 79 and the wall will have columns at sixty -foot intervals (see Figure 30). However, the
combination of berm plus wall or fence height at any point along Highway 79 South shall not
exceed eight (8) feet above adjacent street curb grade. Due to the variety and density of
landscaping placed on the Highway side of the wall, most of the wall is eventually expected to be
obscured from Highway views.
September 24, 2008 33
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 34
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008
BERM AND WALL ALONG HWY 79 W/O PLANTING
ELEVATION sate NTS
BERM AND WALL ALONG HWY 79 W/ PLANTING
ELEVATION sae NTS
HIGHWAY 79 BUFFER
PLAN VIEW scut rnu'
8' MAXIMUM COMBINEDHEIGHT
18' WIDE COLUMN SPACED 8G O.C.
/T -4' VAR STAGGERED WALL
Y
.4
4 1 Itat:
2' 4'MAX VAR BERM
T -4 STAGGERED WALL
W/ 18' COLUMNS
SCREEN SHRUBS
INTERIOR OF SITE
2' 4' HIGH STAGGERED WALL
Wpm- COLUMNS
BUFFER PLANTING
STREET TREES
ACCENT PLANTING
8' MEANDERING SIDEWALK
S MIN FROM CURS AND TO
MEANDER WITH -IN R.O.W.
HIGHWAY 79
35
Elsewhere, the buffer will also contain any necessary acceleration and deceleration lanes,
bus stops and their associated seating and shelters, as well as corridors for utility structures
including, but not limited to, transformers, back -flow devices, and detector checks. Utility
equipment placed in the buffer area will, whenever possible, be placed below grade in
accordance with Section 17.22.168.F.5.
2. Rear (North) Property Line
A nominal 20 -foot buffer along the rear PDO area property line, adjacent to the
residential area, will contain plantings and trees to help mitigate off -site visual impacts from
parking and buildings in the PDO area (Figure 10). A proposed white, three -rail fence, with
integrated chain -link, is placed along this property line for esthetic and safety reasons, due to the
proximity of the proposed drainage channel. Plantings, in and around parking areas and adjacent
to buildings, will further mitigate off -site views of parking and buildings. Additionally, a 12-
foot wide Equestrian trail will be graded to the north of the property line with cooperation of the
Los Ranchitos Homeowners Association and the consent of the respective property owners.
In areas where the cross -site drainage channel is located the buffer will be reduce in
width to five feet, measured from the property line to the top of the channel slope. Plantings may
be reduced in areas adjacent to playing fields where visual impacts are at a minimum
3. Shared Mini Plazas
4. Parking Areas
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Where possible adjacent development parcels are encouraged to use coordinated designs
to provide shared mini- plazas for common use between the sites. Buildings may be grouped
closer together and open space combined to achieve these elements. Such mini- plazas will be in
reasonable proximity to building entries and will be connected to the system of landscaped
pedestrian pathways that traverse the PDO area. Plazas will have shade trees and seating for
informal meetings (Figure 11).
Parking Lots will include plantings and trees to provide shade and to soften their visual
impact, with trees grouped at the end of parking rows, wherever feasible. Large canopy shade
trees will also be placed in planter islands at regular intervals within permanent parking lots in
accordance with the city standards. Pedestrian pathways should be clearly identified with a
variety of plantings, open and trellis- covered walkways (Figure 12), textures and enhanced
surfaces.
Plantings and features used to screen and soften permanent parking areas will be
balanced with maintaining carefully framed building views into and out from the site. Temporary
parking lots, to the extent that overall project landscaping requirements have already been met,
may not be required to have landscaping within the lot proper. However, effort should be made
to soften views of expansive, temporary parking areas by landscaping the perimeter of such
lot(s).
September 24, 2008 36
z
27
N N 0
u z 0 LLI
z
Ng z
a h 01
Zu K 0
_lit z i.
CO 0
F
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
N
o w
o Ch
a Ch
U
o
N
W W
w3 A
A 44
N
0 0 w Z
0 0
September 24, 2008 37
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
I V
38
SECTION
September.24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
12' PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR
PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR PARKNG AREA
Qd F NT$
MEDIAN W/ ENHANCED PAVING
PEDESTRIAN CORRIDOR o PARKING AREA
PLAN VIEW
PARKING
ACCENT
VRIE ON TRELLIS
8' HIGH TRELLIS
W/ 12' 55. COLUMNS
6' WALKWAY
12' MIN. TO FACE
OF CURS
8' HIGH
ARDOR
NE5
39
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
5. Storm Drain Channel
A drainage channel, carrying cross -site drainage from areas north of the PDO area to the
southwest corner of the PDO area, is located in some areas along the rear and west property
lines. Sides and bottom of the channel are covered with a grass mix, except at various important
points (channel bends and culvert entries and exits) where rip -rap is used for erosion protection.
The channel bottom also contains a concrete channel to control minor irrigation and nuisance
(low -flow) run -off. In sensitive locations, such as adjacent to the Church and Schools, an
underground concrete culvert pipe replaces the channel. In areas where the channel exists, the
rear buffer landscaping is modified to a five -foot strip measured from the property line to the top
of the channel slope (Figure 10).
6. Water District Easement on West Property Line
Surface of easement will be hydro- seeded with a non irrigated grass mix to mitigate weed
growth and potential dust impact.
7. Temporary Ground Cover
Undeveloped site areas graded under previous phases and planned for future development
will be hydro- seeded with a non irrigated grass mix to mitigate weed growth and potential dust
impact. Such hydro seeded areas should be provided with temporary irrigation until such time
that the seed mix has germinated and established itself.
8. Equipment and Service Areas Screening
Aboveground placements of utility and mechanical equipment, and service areas, will be
screened with walls, covers (where appropriate to avoid views down into enclosures), and
landscaped in accordance with city standards.
B. STREETSCAPES
The design of streetscapes provides for clear patterns of ingress and egress, efficient
vehicular travel and encourages the safe movement of pedestrian throughout the PDO area.
Roadway design will allow for, and integrate, a pleasing pedestrian experience, incorporating
both low -level plantings and trees alongside pathways. Landscaping will be used in a hierarchy
of plantings to emphasize different locations and uses within the PDO, for instance, one type of
street tree for the main thoroughfare, Rancho Pueblo Road, and another for Chapel Lane.
Medians greater than a minimum 5 feet clear dimension will be planted with low -level plantings
(see Figures 13 through 16 and 18 for street landscape details).
September 24, 2008 40
STREET TREES
25' O.C. SPACING
LIL4
r
HIGHWAY 79
RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD ENTRY
PLAN VIEW suite raa
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
2 STORY D16DNG
ACCENT
CAN PY TREE
4' WIDE RAISED TIED/AN
W/ ENHANCED PAVING
ENTRY SILAGE
ACCENT SHRUB AND
GROUNCGOVER PLANTING
BB' WIDE ERNE ENTRY WITH 4 WIDE
RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD ENTRY
PERSPECTIVE
TURF
ACCENT GROUND COVER
ACCENT TREES
D ✓E qeN w /ENHANCED PAVNG
6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK
ENTRANCE SIGNAGE
4' WIDE RAISED MEDIAN
W/ ENHANCED PAVING
September 24, 2008 41
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD
SECTION scut Nrs.
RANCHO PUEBLO ROAD
PLAN VIEW scut ram
PARNNG LOT
SCREEN SHRUBS
BUILDING
BUILDING
FOUNDATION
PLANTING
COLUMNAR STREET TREES
20 SETBACK
S' SIDEWALK
RO.W. LINE
PARKING LOT
SCREEN SHRUBS
ARKING LOT TREES
STREET TREES a 1 PER 26
PARKING LOT
September 24, 2008 42
STREET TREES
25' O.C. SPACING
RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY ENTRY
PERSPECRVE
ACCENT TURF
ACCENT
GROUND COVER
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
ACCENT CANOPY TREES
ACCENT SHRUB PLANTING
ACCENT
CANOPY TREE
4' MEDIAN W/
!MANCE° CONCRETE PAVING
ACCENT SNRUS AND
GROLAOCOVER ?INNINGS
ACCENT TURF
Y,
Ii 'Pr
4
I '.l1.
RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY ENTRY
PLAN VIEW SCAM rma
G4' WIDE DRIVE ENTRY
12' x 12 x 12 tt011 TOWER
W/ 5' X 9' ELECTRON&
EIGNACE ON 2 SIDES.
4
CEP PAVNG 0
CIA
„er.
6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK
12' X 12' X 12' RICH TOWER
W/ 5' X 9' ELECTRONIC SIGNAGE
I- DECORATIVE ENTRY PAVING
4 MEDIAN W/ ENHANCED CONCRETE PAVING
September 24, 2008 43
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
A
1
RANCHO COMMUNITY WAY
SECTION
GROUND COVER
ACCENT SHRUB
SCREEN SHRUBS
COLUMNAR STREET TREES
RANCHO COMMUNIT WAY
PLAN VIEW SUMraa
48' WIDE STREET
MAIN SANCTUARY
ACCENT PALM
PLANTING
A'
MAIN SANCTUARY
ACCENT PALM PLANTING
f4 a
y ista e"�s� s¢°' Q
/O�Eifr..i ire. it/rod/ /1! /n?iartarestenzeer a�
HWY-79
6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK
2' -4' MAX VAR BERM
2' -4' VAR. STAGGERED WALL
W/ 18" COLUMNS
(WALL AND BERM
COMBINED 8' MAX HEIGHT
44
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
J
2e9\-Y-
RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH SIGN
PERSPECTIVE swe NTS
as
i
RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURCH SIGN
PLAN VIEW 1CNEYHV
ACCENT TREES
ENTRY SIGNAGE
ACCENT GROUNDCOVER
AND SHRUB PLANTING
INTERIOR OF SITE
-4' HIGH STAGGERED WALL
W/ US' COLUMNS
(WALL BBERM
COMBINED HEIGHT B' MAX.)
BUFFER PANTING
SIGNAGE
ACCENT GROUND COVER
B' MEANDERING SIDEWALK
5' MIN FROM CURB AND TO
MEANDER WRH.N R.O.W.
HIGHWAY 79
ACCENT TREES
STREET TREES
ACCENT PLANTING
45
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER
ENTRY PERSPECTIVE
ACCENT
CANOPY TRH
HA CEN ROTO
ENTRY MANAGES
ACCENT 6CHWBAW
ROYNOCOYER PLATIN65
HIGHWAY T9
TURF
HALCON ROZO ENTRACE &ESN
ACCENT GROUND COYER
ACCENT TREES
LID' WIDE DRIVE ENTRY
HALCON ROJO PROFESSIONAL CENTER
ENTRY PLAN VIEW
September 24, 2008 46
C. ENTRY FEATURES
D. PLAZAS DESIGNS ELEMENTS
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Coordinate landscape design for site entries with architectural features such as lighting,
signage, monuments and berm. Use easily identifiable sub palettes to indicate the differing,
hierarchical importance of the various entries, but include some elements that are commonly
identifiable to the entire PDO area. Plant appropriate accent ground cover at the bases of all
monuments and signage. (See Figures 13, 15, 17, and 18 for landscape entry details).
A hierarchy of pedestrian- oriented plazas will be used throughout the PDO area. Plaza
areas will be designed at a scale proportionate to their potential capacity to avoid the appearance
of barren, uninhibited spaces, using various elements such as trees, fountains and landscaped
planters to creatively dissipate the large groups into smaller components. Use structural
landscape elements such as seating, low walls, arbors and trellises, throughout the site at
appropriate locations to encourage rest and contemplation. A valuable element will be the
inclusion of shaded, seating areas to provide for outdoor, informal meetings and lunch venues,
and, in the Church and School site, to encourage fellowship before and after both worship
services and during the school day.
Large plazas, such as the Church's central gathering place, will receive particular care
and will be designed with both hard- surface and soft surface areas accommodating activities
such as resting, gathering, traversing and building ingress and egress. Additionally, such large
plazas need to account for the gathering and movement of large groups of people, such as the
projected 3,500 churchgoers attending services at the proposed Worship Center, which will
implicitly necessitate the use of fairly substantial paved areas. Larger specimen trees will be the
focus of the gathering place planted in conjunction with smaller scale plantings to highlight
various users of the gathering place (Figure 19).
E. PAVEMENT FINISHES
Pavement finishes for similar uses will, whenever possible, be consistent and uniform
throughout the PDO area. Employ site- and project specific treatments only at site specific
Locations such as mini plazas, crosswalks and roadway entries as a means of highlighting the
different site elements within the PDO.
F. CITY STANDARDS
Design and construction of all facilities within the PDO area will conform to the design
guidelines contained in this PDO. However, where not particularly specified herein, city
standards will be used.
September 24, 2008 47
September 24, 2008
Rancho ,Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
4010
i.
ogro
^gym lyto
Z
48
G. PLANT PALETTE
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
A hierarchy of plants selected from the Rancho Pueblo Plant Palette (Table 17.22.172), as
derived from the City Wide Design Guidelines, will be used to provide variety in conjunction
with the varying usage of the different landscaped elements. Project- specific plant palettes must
be integrated throughout the Rancho Pueblo PDO, but with allowances made to subtly
distinguish one project from the next through changed emphases on grouped plantings.
Street Tree Highway 79
Botanical Name
Platanus acerifolia
Schinus molle
Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE
Street Tree Rancho Pueblo Drive,
Botanical Name
Platanus acerifolia
Major Entry Tree and Accent Tree
Botanical Name
Arbutus unedo
Arecastrum romanzoffianum
Jacaranda mimosifolia
Phoenix dactylifera
Parking Lot Canopy Tree
Botanical Name
Chitalpa `Pink Dawn"
Tipuana tipu
Koelrueteria bipinnata
Podocarpus gracilior
Ulmus parvifolia
Parking Lot Accent Tree
Botanical Name
Koelrueteria bipinnata
Jacaranda mimosifolia
Magnolia grandiflora
Prunus `Krauter Vesuvius'
Pyrus Kawakamii
Common Name
Plane Tree
California Pepper
Chapel Lane
Common Name
Plane Tree
Common Name
Dwarf Strawberry Tree
Queen Palm
Jacaranda
Date Palm
Common Name
Chitalpa
Tipu Tree
Chinese Flame Tree
Fern Pine
Evergreen Elm
Common Name
Chinese Flame Tree
Jacaranda
Bull Bay
Purple Leaf Plum
Evergreen Pear
September 24, 2008 49
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6)
Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE (con 't)
Plaza Tree
Botanical Name
Arecastrum romanzoffianum
Cassia leptophylla
Eriobotrya deflexa
Jacaranda mimosifolia
Phoenix dactylifera
Prunus `Krauter Vesuvius'
Pyrus Kawakamii
Washingtonia Robusta
Background Screen Tree
Botanical Name
Podocarpus gracilior
Laurus nobilis
Screen Shrubs
Botanical Name
Grevillia noellii
Ligustrum j. `Texanum'
Phorium tenax
Photinia fraseri
Rhaphiolepis indica
Virburnum suspensum
Ornamental Shrubs
Botanical Name
Abelia `Edward Goucher'
Arbutus `compacta'
Asplendium bulbiferum
Carissa species
Clivia miniata
Cotoneaster species
Dietes bicolor
Grevillia Noellii
Heteromeles arbutifolia
Ligustrum j.. `Texanum'
Phorium tenax
Photinia fraseri
Pittosporum species
Rhaphiolepis indica
Viburnum suspensum
Common Name
Queen Palm
Gold Medallion Tree
Bronze Loquat
Jacaranda
Date Palm
Purple Leaf Plum
Evergreen Pear
Mexican Fan Palm
Common Name
Fern Pine
Sweet Bay
Common Name
Grevillia
Texas Privet
Flax
Photinia
Indian Hawthorne
Sandankwa Viburnum
Common Name
Abelia
Dwarf Strawberry Tree
Mother Fem
Natal Plum
Kafir Lily
Cotoneaster
Fortnight lily
Grevillia
Toyon
Texas Privet
Flax
Photinia
Tobira
Indian Hawthorne
Sandankwa Viburnum
September 24, 2008 50
Groundeovers Vines
Botanical Name
Agapanthus africanus
Delosprema `Alba'
Hemerocallis hybrids
Myoporum species
Pelargonium pelatum
Rosmarinus `Prostratus'
Trachelospremum jasiniodes
Verbena peruviana
Table 17.22.172 RANCHO PUEBLO PLANT PALETTE (con't)
Vines
Botanical Name
Disdictis buccinatoria
Parthenocissis tricuspidata
Hardenbergia violacea
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6)
Turf Grass
Common Name
Dwarf Medalion Tall Fescue Blend
Hybrid Bermuda Grass
(GN -1 by Pacific Sod Company, or equal)
Common Name
Lily of the Nile
White Ice Plant
Day Lilies
Prostrate Myoporum
Ivy Geranium
Prostrate Rosemary
Star Jasmine
Verbena
Common Name
Blood Red Trumpet Vine
Boston Ivy
Happy Wanderer
Located at all non -sports field areas
Located at all sports field areas
September 24, 2008 51
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
17.22.174 INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Development of Rancho Pueblo is expected to take place over a number of years,
reflecting the congregational growth in the Church and market demand for professional and
commercial facilities in the area. While each component of the Rancho Pueblo project may be
developed separately, they will do so under the guidelines developed herein and, when needed,
the City Wide Design Guidelines. Development may proceed sequentially or concurrently, with
each portion contributing piece -by -piece to the overall vision, acting as a microcosm of the way
in which a well planned city develops. Construction of the planned first phase of buildings will
begin immediately following initial site grading.
The development schedule for the Church and School site is currently planned in five
phases. The initial phase is the most extensive, including construction of the Family Life
Center /Interim Sanctuary, Chapel, Preschool/Elementary school complex, the first phase of the
Administration building, east and west Sports Fields with the associated western Storage
building, and construction of two groupings of temporary, modular buildings (`A' and `B') at the
rear and front of the site, respectively. Phase Two, includes construction of the Adult Education
building, the first phase of the Elementary School, the second phase of the Administration
building, and the eastern Field House and an additional Storage building.
The third phase of the Church and School site commences with the removal of the rear
(`A'), temporary, modular buildings and progresses to the addition of the High School building,
first phase of the Gymnasium, completion of the Elementary School and the fmal Storage
building Phase Four, begins with removal of the remaining, front -most (`B') temporary modular
buildings and continues with the construction of the Middle School and completion of phase two
of the Gymnasium. The fifth, and fmal, phase involves construction of the Worship Center and
the necessary, associated, Parking Structure. A high degree of flexibility is designed into the
Church project to allow for possible alternative building phasing if the need arises. Should funds
be available or needs arise earlier than initially planned, later phases of the Church's
development may be accelerated.
It is expected that, in contrast to the Church and Schools site, the Professional Center
areas to the east and west of the site will develop reasonably quickly in accordance with market
dictates. The expected first phase will be construction of the self storage facility at the rear of the
eastern site followed by the Professional Office on the eastern site, with the fmal phase being the
Medical Office buildings on the western site. Similar to the Church portion of Rancho Pueblo,
these areas have a great deal of flexibility allowed in their design to incorporate the diversity of
uses permitted.
Initial development within the PDO Area shall include the installation of all
improvements on both sides of Rancho Pueblo Road from its intersection with SR -79 South to its
intersection with Chapel Lane. This includes curbs, sidewalks, and landscape planting design and
installation on both sides of the street (for a minimum of 16 feet from the face of curb) and both
corner entry statements of Rancho Pueblo at SR -79 South.
September 24, 2008 52
A. UTILITIES
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Major infrastructure needs within the PDO area will be planned at one time and designed
for construction in a manner that will serve both initial and long -term build -out needs. Backbone
corridors will be planned and set forth, within dedicated public streets or easements where
appropriate, and delineated in concert with the appropriate utility district or other utility
purveyor.
B. GRADING AND DRAINAGE
It is anticipated that, at the time of adoption of this PDO, site grading and associated
drainage will occur in a single phase (Figures 20 and 21). Site grading is expected to be one
percent minimum fall, with on -site and through -site drainage accommodated in a combination of
street storm drains, culverts and overland channels.
September 24, 2008 53
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 54
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 55
17.22.176 DESIGN GUIDELINES
A. ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PD0-6)
The Rancho Pueblo PDO architecture, reflecting its Spanish American heritage, is
characterized by understated elegance and simplicity incorporating the careful use of details to
enhance its attractiveness and function. The challenge confronting designers is to develop an
architectural design that captures the charm and quality of that heritage, while meeting the needs
of enclosing a variety of uses.
Design buildings as part of an overall site architectural esthetic, established throughout
the PDO, wherein the central Church and Schools site and the Professional Centers to the east
and west, are complimentary in design. The buildings will be primarily one -story and two -story
structures to complement the residential scale of the surrounding areas.
The Worship Center will be the primary feature of the site as well as for the surrounding
area, becoming a feature symbol for the entire site and the neighborhood. Its derivative,
Spanish American heritage design will provide identity, a sense of character and also provide a
positive visual enhancement to the image of the City of Temecula. It is a large- footprint building
that employs architectural elements derived from a Spanish American aesthetic, in conjunction
with stepped sides, to minimize its volumetric impact.
The City, as part of their review of development proposals, will consider these Rancho
Pueblo PDO guidelines as examples in determining the acceptability of architectural plans and
site plan review applications. The City will encourage innovation and imagination in
architectural and site design while retaining a clear and defined connection to the fundamental
elements of the overall Rancho Pueblo architectural style.
All building structures within the PDO area will have, to varying degree, some or much
of the architectural treatments and features illustrated on the pages that follow. In particular, the
basic building design elements are illustrated in Figure 22 and 22a -c; the use of such
architectural elements will be consistent with the architectural style of the building.
Architectural designs will incorporate an appropriate variety of qualities including compatibility
with adjoining buildings, intimacy of space, layering of views, accent landscaping, richness of
materials, play of lights, and appropriateness of rooflines. Where feasible, entries will be
oriented toward plazas, courtyards and not directly off parking lots.
1. Form and Scale
To blend more closely with the adjacent residential neighborhood, design building
masses with sufficient articulation to break up larger building volumes to promote a smaller,
more human scale. Facades will be broken up with offsets, fenestration and other articulations to
avoid long unbroken walls No massive, box -type structures with unbroken facades and long
continuous forms are permitted, excepting parking structures, which, by their nature are rigid in
their design footprints and mass. In the case of parking structures significant efforts will be
made to mitigate its form and size (see Section A.5 and Figures 22d -g).
September 24, 2008 56
September 24, 2008
Parapet W/Precast
Conc. Cornice
(not foam)
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Parapet W/Plant -On,
2 Step, Stucco Cornice
Mission 5 The Roof
W/Plant-On 2 step,
Stucco Fascia
II
g a s in i t c -i llm >u® .dam
I i��ralia� �t+P' it a3.
Column W/Plan[Ort. Splitface Veneer Al mmmn
2 Step, Stucco Cap Wainscotlnb Storefront
Splitface Veneer Base Typ. Throughout W /Greylite 14
Primary Entries
Plant-On 2 Step,
Stucco Bases Elseware
1. Skip Trowel Stucco Throughout
2. Mission 5 T;le Tema Cotta Blend
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22
57
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Vertical Architectural
Massing at Entries
Ideality Recessed in
Skip Trowel Stucco or
Precast Conc. Segments
Type Follows Segmental Arch
1. Skip Trowel Stucco Throughout
2. Mission S Tile Terra Cotta Blend
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Architectural Aesthetic Figure 22 a
September 24, 2008 58
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
PRECAST
CONCRETE
FLOOR BREAK
VARIATION
OF WINDOW
SIZE ED£51GN
Planned Development Overlay PAOI -0522
Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22b
September 24, 2008 59
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22c
September 24, 2008 60
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Stair Tower
Elevation Beyond
Portions of Top Level set back 20' from
lower levels on Hwy 79 Frontage
i I -1 11 =i i 1 -i 1 i -11 i -I -1 I
III ill -1114 I i III lit_ 111- 111-:' it
1- I ts- 1 -11 71 1 11-E III= I FIL H IIH H6 111 F L IE HIEH I rilt
Hi 11-11_11E11 Ili-FL-ill IiIn!
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Architectural Aesthetics Figure 22d
61
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Parking Structure Perspective View Key Figure 22e
September 24, 2008 62
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
N I-
X z
it O
d m m
2 re
G" Z o
Q
Z l
re
Y
re
1-
m
I )1
1
Planned Devfdpment Overlay PA01 -0522
Parking Struatut'e Perspective Figure 22f
September 24, 2008 63
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Parking Structure Perspective Figure 22g
64
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
While all buildings in the Church and Schools project area are limited to two stories, it is
recognized that religious worship spaces, similar to concert performance halls, tend to be loftier
structures with enhanced interior volume. Nevertheless, the Family Life Center, serving as the
initial worship space, and the proposed future, new Worship Center, will not exceed 45 feet,
which is well below the current Professional Office zoning height limit at this site of 75 feet.
To the degree that is practically possible, and especially within the Church and School's
site, buildings will be designed with a general scale and texture that compliments existing
development both within the City in general, and, more specifically, within the surrounding
residential areas.
To further mitigate potential impacts of the larger footprint buildings, the other, mostly
one- and two -story site buildings will be aesthetically designed to coordinate with the design of
the Worship Center, with a hierarchy of building scales, stepping down from the Worship Center
to the perimeter of the site.
2. Complexity and Unity
Within the context of an overall PDO area architectural theme, varying building forms
and rooflines are encouraged, with facades variegated with returns, fenestration and other
building elements, such as towers and building entries. Include, similar architectural elements,
as outlined below, to unify further the building design across the PDO area. Tower structures and
specific entry designs will be used to accent important features of the site.
3. Architectural Elements
a) Building Entries
Entries to buildings and lower floors will be of a scale that matches and encourages
pedestrian movement and use. Differentiate primary and secondary entrances clearly as
indicated in Figures 23, 24, 25 and 25a. Along lower portions of building facades, use of arcades
designed integral to pedestrian pathways is encouraged (see also, landscape design illustrations
in Section 17.22.172).
b) Building elements (Parapets, cornices, stairs)
Parapets and cornices will be designed in accordance with Figure 22 and 22a -c.
Staircases will be integrated into the overall pedestrian traffic pattem and will be consistent in
their mass and design with the buildings style.
September 24, 2008 65
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
LOGO, WINDOW FEATURE
OR TENANT 51GNPGE
LOGO, WINDOW FEATURE
OR TENANT 5IGNAGE
LOGO, WINDOW FEATURE
'P TENANT 5IGNAGE
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Typical Entrance Detail Figure 23
September 24, 2008 66
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Deve opment Overlay PA01 0522
Secondary Entry/Exit Cover A Figure 24
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Secondary Entry/Exit Cover B Figure 24a
September 24, 2008 67
Splitface Veneer
Wainscoting
Typ. Throughout
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
ilAJERUSOMISIII Tint
Aluminum
Storefront
W /Greylite 14
Min. 4x4 Rough
Sawn Members
Sq. Cut Ends
Double Supporting Beams
24 Overhang Special
Cut At Ends
Precast Concrete
Modular Column
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Secondary Entry/Exit Covers Figure 25
September 24, 2008 68
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Double Supporting Beams
24" Overhang Special
Cut At Ends
SplitfaceVeneer
2 Yp. PSA
Min. 4x4 Rough
Sawn Members
Sq. Cut Ends
'Athinin
Storefront
W /Greylite 14
Enhanced Paving
Precast Concrete
Modular Column
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Secondary Entry/Exit Covers Figure 25 a
September 24, 2008 69
c) Roofs
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Varying rooflines and complete full roof structures are encouraged, although, where
views do not extend onto roof surfaces, a mansard -type treatment may be used.
Rooflines and roof materials will be appropriate to the architectural style, including the
use wherever feasible of two -piece terra cotta tile, as indicated in Figure 22 and 22a -c.
d) Arcades, Colonnades, Balconies
Arcades are encouraged, in particular, due to their pedestrian function and association
with the proposed predominant architectural style of the PDO. Figure 26, shows characteristic
colonnade details.
Balconies will be designed so that they are functional and located so that they do not
infringe on the privacy of neighboring properties.
e) Window, Doors, Wall Openings
Window shape and detailing will be consistent with traditional Spanish American
heritage design. They will be proportionate to the wall mass, in which they are situated, and
include appropriate material treatment that is consistent with the building style. Figure 27
illustrates window and entry covers, including sloped and flat exterior shade coverings; the latter
are more characteristic of garden and plaza areas, and are well scaled for secondary entrances
(see also Figure 27a).
Design doors to complement the architectural style, using wood, molding, hinges,
doorknobs, and doorknockers appropriate to the Spanish American heritage (see Figure 22c).
4. Materials and Finishes
Appropriate materials to the architecture can include wrought iron, stucco or board -on-
board. Material sample boards will be attached to individual site specific plan applications.
5. Parking Structures
Design parking structures to allow incorporation of building facades, tower elements, and
other features that will promote a tie -in with the overall Spanish American design theme; upper
level decks to setback 20 feet along the Highway 79 frontage (see Figure 22d) Exterior building
finishes, false window and wall treatments will also reflect the architectural design treatments on
adjacent structures. Place structures to minimize their intrusion in public views, especially from
the Los Ranchitos residential areas north of the PDO Area. Graduated landscape screening
materials will be used to soften the structure's overall appearance, with taller trees and planted
materials serving to break up building lines.
Consider trailing vines, climbing vines, and other exterior wall surface plantings, where
practicable.
September 24, 2008 70
Column W/P ant -On,
2 Step, Stucco Cap
Plant -On 2 Step,
Stucco Bases
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Splitface Veneer
Wainscoting
Typ. Throughout
Mission S Tile Roof
W/Plant -On2 step,
Stucco Fascia
Aluminum Segmental Arches
Storefront TSP.
W /Greylim 14
t. Skip Trowel Stucco Throughout
2. Mission S Tile Terra Cons Blend
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Colonnade Figure 26
September 24, 2008 71
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Double Supporting Beasts
24 Overhang Special
Cut At Ends
Min. 4x4 Rough
Sawn Members
Sq. Cut Ends
i ace Vencer
Wainscoting
Typ. Throughout
Aluminum Precast Concrete
Storefront Modular Column
W /Greylite 14
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Exterior Sloped Window Shade Covers Figure 27
72
5/6' TYPE
'X' GWB
4X HOOD
TRIM
4 X WOOD
TRIM
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO 6)
GLAZING PER
SCHEDULE
WINDOW FRAME
SET IN CONT.
BEAD SILICONE
SEALANT
WOOD CANT
DOUBLE PLATE
7/8" STUCCO
HDR PER FRAMING
PLAN
SACKER ROD
AND SEALANT
SHIM AS
REQUIRED
NAIL -ON WINDOW
WITH STOREFRONT
PROFILE
G. I. FLASHING
BULLNOSE MASONRY
SILL COPING SET IN
EPDXY GROUT
BACKER ROD
AND SEALANT
7/8" STUCCO
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Window Detail Figure 27a
September 24, 2008 73
6. Drive -Thru
Drive -thru establishments, as permitted in the Land Use Matrix for the PDO, will be
designed in accordance with city standards.
B. ACCENT ELEMENTS
1. Paving, Plazas and Walkways
Plazas and connecting pedestrian walkways shall be designed as part of an overall PDO
area network. Structural landscape elements such as seating, low walls, arbors and trellises will
be incorporated throughout, at appropriate locations, to encourage rest and contemplation, as
illustrated in Figure 11.
2. Site Furniture
Design and place outdoor furniture, integrated with, and complimentary to, the
architectural style, throughout the site, to encourage informal seating and gathering; be especially
cognizant of the need for informal lunchtime eating areas. Coordinate placement with provision
of landscaped and architecturally shaded areas. Examples of appropriate seating are illustrated in
Figure 28.
3. Fountains
Fountains of various sizes, and designed complimentary to the architectural style, are
encouraged at various locations throughout the PDO area. Fountains will be used to highlight
entries, help mask exterior site noise intrusion close to Highway 79, and to break -up larger paved
and plaza areas. An example of an appropriate fountain is illustrated in Figure 29.
4. Raised Planters
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Use raised and curbed planters to protect plantings from foot traffic, where appropriate
and where site grades lend themselves to such elements. In some cases elaborate and expand
planters into seating areas as appropriate, and as illustrated in Figure 28.
September 24, 2008 74
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
BJLLN05E
12" JUMBO BRICK
1 "THICK
CLAY PAVERS
4" PATIO 14/0X6
IOGA WIRE MESH
5440 PALM
BENOH
R -3' 2
R =4' 7
LEVEL 1 PLANTER
ERILIANT FLORAL
1 COLOR
LEVEL 2 PLANTER
BRILIANT FLORAL
I COLOR ACCENT
TO LEVEL 1
SECTION ELEV
#4 CONTINOU5
--I I/2" DIA. 5CHEO..
40 PVC GRAIN 6' 0.6
B X 8 16 BLOCK
W /114 VERT. 32" O.C.
N/ OPEN HEAD JT5
FOR DRAINAGE
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Typical Planter/Integrated Seat Figure 28
September 24, 2008 75
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
w
0
0
Q G�
g
0
w
He olll
Z
w
G
5 a
0o
September 24, 2008 76
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
0
September 24, 2008 77
C. WALLS AND FENCES
Integrate fences and walls into the overall PDO area thematic design, so that they provide
a sense of definition and are consistent with the architectural style.
1. Masonry Stucco
Use stucco- covered masonry walls atop the berm running within the Highway 79 buffer
as detailed in Figure 30.
2. Three Rail
Along the rear and west property lines, use white, three -rail fencing with incorporated
chain -link, as indicated and detailed in Figure 31.
3. Chain -Link
D. LIGHTING
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Free standing chain -link fencing is not permitted, except along the Water District and
Southern California Edison easements on the west property line, if existing or as required by the
respective agencies for safety purposes. All such fencing will have screening landscaping planted
immediately adjacent along its entire length, except at necessary gate locations.
Rancho Pueblo contains a wide range of land uses, necessitating use of varied lighting
types across the PDO area. These include streetlights, parking lot standards, walkway and low
level security lighting, wall wash and accent fixtures, and other specialty lighting. While
recognizing the differing lighting requirements for the various uses, a common design theme, in
keeping with the overall Spanish American derivative style of the PDO, will provide for as much
uniformity of lighting design as possible.
Keep adverse impacts of lighting to a minimum, with especial care to the prevention of
light spillage over adjacent properties and screening of visible bright—light sources from view
from adjacent residential areas and from Highway 79. Additionally, use selective sub -area
switching to keep night lighting to the minimum required for any given set of uses.
Specify lighting placements as part of Site Development Plan submittals. Where
appropriate, manufacturer's samples, cut sheets, or brochures will be included to illustrate
equivalent style and forms. Provide photometrics for any lighting planned for light- sensitive
areas, e.g., sports fields near residential use and highway- adjacent lighting next to State
roadways. Typical lighting information and fixtures are shown in Figure 32a through 32d.
September 24, 2008 78
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
a
ma
iu
C
am
(o
September 24, 2008 79
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
September 24, 2008 80
Design Features
Specification Guide
VK 11
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
VK 1100 Series
lumilite
Housing: The heavy duty spun aluminum shroud is
welded to the 8" diameter extruded aluminum
thorax and sealed to prevent water entry The top
cap seals ballast compartment and is removable for
accessing ballast by three (3) stainless steel fasteners.
Dome Cap: The rugged hydroformed aluminum
cap with a hemispherical shape rests on the cast
aluminum ring welded to the extruded thorax.
Cap is gasketed to prevent water or insect entry.
Door Assembly: Spun aluminum frame secures
dear tempered glass lens Frame is gasketed and
secured to housing with tamper resistant stainless
steel fasteners.
Optical Assembly: Hydroformed reflector is
secured in housing and provides and IES type III
distribution.
Mounting Bracket: Extruded aluminum arm assembly
with decorative support is welded to luminaire dome
cap. Assembly is secured to pole with stainless steel
fasteners.
Ballast/lamp Assembly: Ballast are high power factor
and suitable for -20°F operation. The ballast is mounted
in the thorax and is secured with two (2) screws. Lamp
socket shall be porcelain medium base pulse-rated and
mounted to reflector
Finish: Polyester powder coating on all metal parts.
Color to be specified.
Listing: Luminaire is ETL listed for wet locations.
Series: Wattage /Lamp,
Volts Options
Fini
50w /HPS 05S
70w /HPS 07S
I00w /HPS 10S
150w /HPS 155
70w /MH 071
100w /MH 10H
175w /MH 17H
120
208
240
277
480
Example: 100 Watt Metal Halide. 120 Volts, Single Fuse, Bronze
VK 111 OH 120/1 F/BZ
1F= Single Fuse
2F= Double Fuse
PH Button Cell
WM= Wall Mount
2A= Twin Arm
3A= Triple Arm
BZ B`.: =ze
WH iNhee
SL Silver
CC Custom Color
Figure 32a
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Parking Lot Driveway Lighting
81
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
902
LAMPS 1 BALLASTS
Incandescent: 1 100W max (A -19).
Fluorescent: 1 compact 26W (F26TTT), or 1 compact 42W (F42TTT).
H.I.D.: 1- 50W or 70W metal halide, or
1- 50W or 70W high pressure sodium. (ED17, medium base).
Specify voltage. Incandescent available 120V ony.
For H.I.D., ballasts are High Power Factor (HPF) thermally protected and outdoor rated. For fluorescent,
Electronic Ballasts (SSB) are standard. 4 -pin lamps required. See "Ballasts" and "Lamps" in Section G. Lamps
by others. See "User Guide" for Information on starting temperatures of fluorescent fixtures.
MATERIALS 1 FIXTURE LOCATION
U.L. listed for wet location. Hood, support arms and post are solid copper. Fixture body and mounting base are
Sand Cast Bronze.
FINISHES
Diffuser: Clear Glass, inside sanded.
Base Body: Sand Cast Bronze (weathers to a dark patina).
Hood, Arms, Post;
NCP Natural Copper (weathers to a dark patina).
VG Verdi -Gris
CC Custom Color, Semi -Gloss
MOUNTING
Overall bollard height is 38" standard. Specify other, (ex: 28 "OA).
Post is wireway; wire is made up below removable head. Conduit
enters at center of base plate. Anchor bolts and template are
supplied with fixture.
BOLLARD
Cast base is standard mounting, supplied
with anchor bolts and template.
Figure 32b
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Walkway, Plaza Parlcing Deck Lighting
82
Design Features
Specification Guide
VK -7
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
VK -700 Series
lumilite
Housing: The heavy duty spun aluminum shroud
is welded to a cast aluminum ring. Three 1/4" blue
acrylic disks with luminous edges are machined to
securely fit between each ring. Three rods bolt the
cast rings and accent disks to the shroud with
satin spacers and are capped with decorative
stainless steel acorn nuts.
Dome Cap: The rugged hydroformed aluminum
cap with a hemispherical shape is secured to the
cast aluminum ring with 3 stainless steel fasteners.
Dome is gasketed to prevent water or insect entry.
Enclosure: An 8" diameter seamless white "DR"
acrylic enclosure is gasketed and secured to a cast
ring welded in shroud with two thumb screws:
Mounting Bracket: A 2 diameter extruded
aluminum arm with 12" radius bend is welded to
cast back plate. Arm slips over the tenon on cap
and is secured with 3 stainless steel fasteners. A
heavy duty steel zinc plated bracket mounts to the
1 -Box and wall surface and is attached to the
inside of cast plate with two stainless steel
fasteners. Dircet mount to pole is optional. "PM"
Ballast /Lamp Assembly: All ballast shall be high
power factor and suitable for -20° F operation.
The ballast is mounted in the thorax and is
secured with two screws. Lamp sockets shall be
porcelain medium base pulse -rated and mounted
to housing.
Finish: Polyester powder coating on all metal
parts. Color to be specified.
Listing: Luminaire is ETL listed for wet locations.
Series
Wattage /Lamp Volts
Options
Finish
50w /HPS =05S
70w /HPS -07S
100w /HPS -105
70w /MH =07H
100w /MH -10H
120
208
240
277
480
1F Srigle Fuse
2F -Double Fuse
PH-Button Cell
PM =Pole Mount
8Z- Bronze
BK =Blare
WH white
SL- Silver
CC °Custom Color
Example: 100 Watt. Metal Halide. 120 Volts. Single Fl SP Rrnm•
VK- 7101-1- 120/1F/BZ Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Wall Mounted Lighting Figure 32c
83
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Light Structure 2'"
Enhanced product, unprecedented 10 -year warranty
Light Structure 2' builds on the success of Musco's Light- Structure
System 'making the industry leading sports lighting system even
better. And now with 10 Club Service. our comprehensive
product assurance warranty Musco provides all parts and labor
to maintain it for the next ten years.
Building on proven product performance
In 1991, Musco introduced the Light Structure System; the first
complete sports-lighting system designed and manufactured from
foundation-to-poletop in 5 Easy Pieces" Engineered to be easy to
buy, install and operate, the system provided major advantages in
environmental light control, energy efficiency, durability, safety
and cost effectiveness.
Even the best engineered laboratory test is not a substitute for the
real world, so Musco's Product Performance Team travels the U.S.
and Canada, inspecting our sports- lighting systems on -site to ensure
they are performing for our customers. To date, we've inspected close
to 50% of all existing Light-Structure Systems.
We're so confldent in Light Structure 2's reliability,
we'll maintain it far the next to years
On -site inspections confirm the outstanding performance of our
lighting system in the field, and helps us identify product
enhancements to make Light Structure 2 even more durable.
In talking with our customers, we've also learned that budget
cuts and overbooked schedules make arranging for routine
maintenance a challenge. To meet our customers' needs, we've
developed 10 Club Service., a comprehensive warranty and
maintenance program providing all parts and labor, including a
group lamp replacement to maintain operation of your
Light- Structure 2 system for the next 10 years, guaranteed.
A program so sound, It's Insured
More than just a promise, Musco's 10 Club Service is underwritten
by a top -rated insurance company. After an independent review of
our outstanding product performance and service record, the
Steadfast Insurance Company further insures Musco will provide
comprehensive 10 Club Service for the full 10 years. You won't find
this added assurance anyplace else in the sports lighting marketplace.
Imagine, worry free lighting season after season for you, your
facility, your community for the next 10 years. Masco's product
and service assurance We Make It Happen.
Planned Development Overlay PA01 0522
Sports Field Lighting Figure 32d
September 24, 2008
5 Easy Pieces
The Light-Structure 2 system Is designed
and manufactured from toundation-to- poleiop
to make your sports- lighting projects
simple, safe, and cest-effective
Paletop
Luminaire
Assembly
Precast
Concrete
Base
Wire
Harness
Electrical
Components
Enclosure
Galvanized
Steel Pole
84
For parking structures, limit exterior wall -wash lighting, while providing outside lighting
primarily for vehicular and pedestrian entrances (no wall packs), and low -level interior security
lighting. Also, limit the height of lights on top level by using bollard -style fixtures, as shown in
Figure 32b, and require glare shielding to confine light to top level and avoid light spillage off
site.
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
1. Streets and Parking Areas
Street and parking lot lighting will be the minimum feasible height, and in no case greater
that twenty feet high. Provide fixtures with cut -off hoods to direct light only horizontally and
downward, using fixtures as shown in Figure 32a.
2. Pedestrian and Wall Mounted
A combination of bollard -style lighting (as shown in Figure 32b) and wall mounted
fixtures (as shown in Figure 32c) will be used throughout the site, for pedestrian areas. Higher,
standard -type lighting may be used in lieu, in certain cases where low -level night, security and
wall -wash lighting is not feasible.
3. Accent
Use accent lighting and specialized techniques to enhance the after -dark image of the
PDO area, particularly entry monuments, signage and signature structures, such as the proposed
Worship Center. All fixtures, except fixtures directed downwards unless under a canopy, will be
low- pressure sodium type meeting the requirements of the Mount Palomar Light Pollution
Ordinance.
4. Sports Fields
Recreational after -dark lighting is required for the playing fields to meet the needs of
sports teams, casual play, and outdoor ministry activities, while recognizing standards set by the
City of Temecula. Consider location, size, type, number of fixtures, and orientation to keep
spillage and impacts to neighboring residential areas to a minimum. Pale mounted fixtures, as
shown in Figure 32d will be used. Data on photometrics, shielding and compliance with the
Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance will be required for all proposed developments. Field users
will be time restricted in cooperation and in coordination with the Church and its neighbors, and
possibly with the City of Temecula.
E. SIGNAGE
Provide signage throughout the PDO area as part of a well coordinated, area -wide
scheme, designed to match and blend with landscaping and building architecture (Figure 33, 34,
34a -b, 36). Integrate directional and identification signage for both vehicular and pedestrian
purposes by incorporating unifying elements such as type, color, lettering, style and logo. Each
tenant will submit a sign plan in accordance with these provisions, under individual site specific
plan submissions.
September 24, 2008 85
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
86
'Tenant' Tenm �a.t�
CHO PUEBLO CENTER
RAN C i
COMMUNITY CHURCH
r
5 5'
G
I' RI�]LE
Rece55ED
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
TWO SIDED
PERPENDICULAR TO STREC
W�SFLOOD Sign DaE
BELOW GRAZE CAN
nverem HM Mt Of Tre Qi. Y�Al N IQG
Fag DOT SIM5 G. TWO
119MM Mt la
TO ES lWINTS S M1
POPO
15 CONC. MOLDING
N /OAST CORNERS
(NOT MITERED(
6' TYPE RECESSED I'
PAINT REM PACE
(NOT SIDES OF FRAF55I
MEDIUM TEN- -FLAT
TENANT SIGNAGE
CAM
PACE CML
TCH ELCG5
Signs A, B, C
GSYNMLC ORM* COOLIE IOT_ YI
IOV TO(E S)e011 1 ww.e NO
ALCON _ROTO
OFESSIONALCENTE[
Ir CONC. MOLDING
W /CAST CORKERS
(NOT MITERED(
T GONG. MOLDING
W/CAST CORNERS
(NOT MITERED]
!REM A
CES Recess]
TEAL -FLAT'
4FACS CHI
ATCH ELDG5
Sign G
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Signage Figures 34
September 24, 2008 87
33/4"
15 FT RULE
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planter
20PT RULE
41/4'
PRECAST CONCRETE
PRECAST COP
LJ
LT 1 rl
L TOE SPACE
R 2B'
ALTERNATE SIGN 0N51RUCT10N:
1/2" EXPANDED FY CUT&ROUTED TO MA TCH DIMEN5I0N5.
SPRAY PAINT SEMI .OL055 TO MATCH STOREFRONT
APPLY WHITE CUT VINYL LETTERING TO SURFACE (AS SHOWN)
Adhered Plaque-
CAST -IN -PLACE
CONCRETE
22 CERAMIC
MOSAIC
2" CLEAR ACRYLIC SALOP W/1 COAT CLEAR, 1 COAT
PAINT TO MATCH STOREFRONT COLOR
ROUTE 1/4' FAO. B POLISH
(NO FLAME P0115H)
WHITE CUT VINYL LETTERS &RULES (APPLIED 20 BACK)
FONT 15 "COPPERPLATE GCYHIC 305C
SIZE 15130 P15 (1)52 OFFERS MP LOWERS 5130 PIS)
REMOVE ALL AIR BUBBLES PRIOR TO PAINING
NO FONT SUBSTITUTION OR ALTERATION
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Signage Figure 34a
September 24, 2008 88
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Under Canopy Signage Figure 34b
September 24, 2008 89
September 24, 2008
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
CONC.. MOLDING
vi/LAST CORNERS
NOT MITERED)
mum Si F
2.5'x9' ELECTRONIC
READER BOARD (TWO 5ICE5)
CHURCH LOGO (OPPO5ITE
TWO 510E51
COPPER ANODIZED
ALUM. FRAME
STUCCO TO MATCH DWG 5
9' TYPE RECESll€D I'
PAINT REAR PACE
(NOT SILLS OP RECESS)
MORTAR CANT
T PACE CMJ
TCH BLOG.5
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Church Signage Tower With Electronic Signage Figure 35
90
1. Monument
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Site identification signs will comply with the requirements set forth herein and to the City
Design Standards, and will be mounted on monument walls no greater than four (4) feet in height
on either one or both sides of entrance roadways (see Figures 33 and 34).
All freestanding signs must be the monument -type no taller than eight (8) feet with no
more than six (6) equal sized tenant spaces with architectural elements at the top, base and sides,
similar to Figure 34. Freestanding pole signs are not permitted.
Place entry monument features, with integral signage identifying the site, at all
appropriate vehicle and pedestrian entries Employ a hierarchy of entry signage designs (Figure
34) to differentiate, clearly, the major entries, at Chapel Lane and Rancho Pueblo Road, from the
secondary entries. The secondary entry at the east boundary of the PDO will receive
proportionately less expansive design elements. Incorporate landscape and architectural features,
blended with overall site landscape and architectural themes, into the design of the entry
monuments. Light entry monuments externally, with low level, low pressure sodium, wall -wash
lighting in accordance with the Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance.
Another variation on the overall PDO signage program relates to the Rancho Pueblo
Sports Center. The signage, shown in Figure 34 Sign E, is designed to complement the park
environment it features stacked ledgestone and stucco sign faces.
2. Building and Tenant Identification
Owner and tenant identification signage, throughout the PDO area, will adhere to a
common design theme and requirements, as delineated herein. Signage design will integrate
with the architectural style of the buildings, through use of such elements as finishes, fasciae and
moldings (Figures 34, 34a, and 36).
Tenants using an entire building will be allowed one freestanding monument sign similar
to the designs shown in Figure 34 but not to exceed a height of four_(4) feet nor a copy area
greater than 30 square feet.
Canopy signs will not be permitted due to the "pueblo" design theme. Under canopy
signs are permitted. All under canopy signs for individual tenants will follow the shape in
Figure 34b; this shape is also used for delivery signs.
Address numbers must meet the Fire Department requirement of 6 All address numbers
are to be located at the same height above curb as directed by the fire marshal.
Restaurant menu signs are permitted only where needed at a drive- through restaurant.
Changeable plaques, On Figure 34 Signs A, B C, where used as a part of a sign, must
be bronze and bolted in place with spacers to maintain a plumb line; sign shape will be the same
as Figure 34a Plaques.
September 24, 2008 91
I 28
Un- interupted
Wall Surface 29•
1.5 Sign Height
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
V!1
SCHMIDT KLEIN ;4
furniture Importers 1b5
14' -0•
16' -71/2'
Planned Development Overlay PA01 -0522
Commercial Wall Mounted Signage Figure 36
September 24, 2008 92
3. Pedestrian- Oriented
Pay particular attention to provision of pedestrian- orientated, directional signage that
acknowledges and encourages pedestrian movement and use throughout the PDO area.
Pedestrian- oriented signage will be used within clusters of buildings and, when appropriate, is
also encouraged within parking areas, directing pedestrians to the various site entities (see Figure
34a).
Pedestrian directional signs will be integrated into raised planters (see Figure 28
Planters). Post and blade pedestrian signs are not allowed, except when required to meet ADA
and Fire Lane signs requirements.
4. Vehicular Directional Signage
Vehicular directional signs will follow the same shape and design as the freestanding
monument signs same texture and colors, maximum height 3' -0" (see Figure 34a).
5. Specialty
6. Sign Illumination
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
Due to the changing and evolving nature of its school programs, the Rancho Community
Church and Schools project may employ an electronic signage feature at the intersection of
Highway 79 South and Chapel Lane (Figure 35). The overall design of such sign will be
integrated with the architectural style of the buildings, through use of such elements as finishes,
fasciae, moldings and lighting. Specific illumination will be determined and addressed as part of
the requisite sign permit; flashing or animated text is not permitted and any associated, fixed
signage text will be integrally incorporated into the structure of this entry monument. Up to two
reader boards on a single sign element are permitted, one each on adjacent or opposing faces, to
facilitate bi- directional observation.
Internal illumination of signs is prohibited. Conventional channel lettering and coated
Styrofoam letters are not allowed.:
External lighting of signs must comply with the lighting requirements in Section
17 22 176 D and with the requirements of the Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance.
7. Commercial Wall Mounted Tenant Signs
The following requirements for commercial wall mounted signage are intended to create
harmonious, controlled appearance to the Rancho Pueblo Development. These requirements are
intended to allow commercial entities to use existing, recognizable identity systems and to
provide a common visual format for commercial entities without existing, recognizable identity
systems. The requirements are also intended to compliment the development's esthetic features
while minimizing competition through visual gimmickry and garish color selection.
September 24, 2008 93
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
a) Guidelines for units with less than 20,000 square feet (without a regionally
recognized identity system):
1. All sign locations to be wall mounted, centered over unit's storefront
and/or entry system below any fascia. Background wall surface must be
1.5 times the sign height.
2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with no more than 6
wall mounted, hooded fixtures, directed against the wall, using white
lamps (no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's design
and details.
3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with
matte finish, no substitutions. No plastic letters /graphics.
4. Each sign to have a primary and secondary line. Primary line is tenant's
name. Secondary line is description of services.
5. Primary line is 14" Times New Roman all uppercase, as shown in Figure
36, maintain matched typefaces and surface finishes; no substitutions
permitted.
6. Secondary line is 7" Times New Roman upper and lowercase, as shown in
Figure 36, maintain matched typefaces and surface finishes; no
substitutions permitted.
7. Rule is 1" tall 3/4" thick cast aluminum, as shown in Figure 36, maintain
matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted.
8. 28" square logo, block, as shown in Figure 36, is optional for tenants who
wish to display a graphics mark. The logo is to be cut (subtracted) from
the square. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic, paint...) Material is
3/4" aluminum cut and fmished maintain matched surface finishes; no
substitutions permitted.
9. All letters and graphic to be mounted with a standoff of 3/4" to 1" from
wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign
manufacturer's specifications. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and
graphic. FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance
may vary from 3/4" to 1
September 24, 2008 94
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
b) Guidelines for units with less than 20,000 square feet (with a regionally
recognized identity system):
1. All sign locations to be wall mounted, centered over unit's storefront
and/or entry system below any fascia.
2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with no more than 5
wall- mounted, hooded fixtures, directed below the horizontal plane, using
white lamps (no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's
design and details.
3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with
matte finish, no substitutions. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic,
paint). Material to be cut and finished, maintain matched surface fmishes;
no substitutions permitted.
4. Sign area must not exceed 38.8 square feet (calculate area using 8 sided
polygon).
5. Sign width must not exceed 16' -7 1/2 Sign height must not exceed 6'.
6. All letters and graphics to be mounted with a standoff of 3/4" to 1" from
wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign
manufacturer's specification. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and
graphic FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance
may vary from 3/4" to I
c) Guidelines for commercial wall mounted tenant /anchor signage for units
with more than 20,000 square feet:
1. All sign locations to be wall mounted below any fascia.
2. All signs are to be externally illuminated from above, with wall mounted,
hooded fixtures, directed below the horizontal plane, using white lamps
(no color). Fixtures to be black and in kind with structure's design and
details.
3. Sign materials are 3/4" to 1" thick cast aluminum anodized black with
matte finish, no substitutions. No applied graphics (cut vinyl, acrylic,
paint...) maintain matched surface finishes; no substitutions permitted.
4. Sign area must not exceed 60 square feet (calculate area using 8 sided
polygon).
Sign width must not exceed 18' 0 Sign height must not exceed 6'.
September 24, 2008 95
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
6. All letters and graphics to be mounted with a stand off of 3/4" to 1" from
wall, with combination stud with pad mounting hardware per sign
manufacturer's specifications. NO FLUSH MOUNTING. All type and
graphic FACE to be on the same plumb vertical plane. Standoff distance
may vary from 3/4" to 1
September 24, 2008 96
A. ADOPTION OF THE PDO
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
17.22.178 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
Procedures set forth below, are guides to the implementation of the Rancho Pueblo
Planned Development.
The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay, once reviewed and approved by the
City of Temecula Planning Commission and adopted by ordinance by the City Council, will
satisfy the General Plan requirement for the Z1 overlay. The present zoning designation on the
approximately 53 acres of the PDO area, Professional Office, remains unchanged, and
development of the area is governed by the requirements set forth in the City of Temecula zoning
code for Professional Office, except as modified herein.
B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW PROCESS
A separate Site Development Plan Review Process (whether Conditional Use Permit or
Site Plan) will be required for each development site within the Rancho Pueblo PDO Area.
Under individual site plan review, precise site plan details including, for example, the number
and mix of specific building usage, shall be required. In general, site development plans shall be
processed in accordance„ with Temecula Municipal Code 17.05.010 Development Plans.
However, to the extent that a proposed use is permitted by the Rancho Pueblo Matrix of Uses,
the Director of Planning may approve such plans, without limitation to the 10,000 square foot
criterion of Code Section 17.05.010(D.2.). Uses requiring a CUP shall be processed through the
Planning Commission.
C. ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Through its adoption by the City of Temecula, the PDO will allow for minor variations
from the design and development standards depicted herein without necessitating further PDO
submissions or amendments. Any proposed alternatives to the development standards contained
herein will be subject to approval by the Director, Department of Community Development.
However, the Director may determine that proposed alternative standards are beyond the scope
intended under this subsection, and may require further review and approval by the Planning
Commission and possibly the City Council.
D. AMENDING THE PDO
To the extent that project proposals fall outside the standards set forth in the PDO, a PDO
Amendment will be required. Processing of such an amendment will require approval by the
Planning Commission and the City Council. Examples of proposed changes that require a PDO
Amendment include but are not limited to, development exceeding two stories, land uses not
permitted within the Matrix of Permitted Uses (Table 17.22.166A, herein), alternative setbacks
and alternative height limits.
September 24, 2008 97
Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay (PDO -6)
E. EXPANSION OF THE PDO AREA
The Rancho Pueblo Planned Development Overlay encompassed approximately 53 acres.
Should the property owner(s) of the adjacent 28 acres to the east, which comprises Z2, elect to be
added to this PDO, application of these development standards will apply. It is recognized that
some additional details, e.g., on -site circulation and community -edge treatments, will have to be
incorporated into development standards for a new planning area of this PDO. Expansion of the
Rancho Pueblo PDO is subject to Planning Commission and City Council review and approval.
September 24, 2008 98
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM NO. 13
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:28 PM.
CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
14 Action Minutes Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Director Edwards
made the motion; it was seconded by Director Roberts; President Washington
abstained; and electronic vote reflected approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
RECOMMENDATION:
ACTION MINUTES
of
JANUARY 27, 2009
14.1 Approve the action minutes of January 13, 2009.
15 Agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District to Implement an After School
Enrichment Program at Vail Ranch Middle School Approved Staff Recommendation
(5 -0 -0) Director Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Director
Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
15.1 Approve the Agreement with Temecula Valley Unified School District to
implement an After School Enrichment Program at Vail Ranch Middle School.
This item was pulled for separate discussion and consideration. Staff presented the agenda
report (of record).
1
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 7:37 p.m., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at 5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session with regular session
commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk /District Secretary
[SEAL]
2
Chuck Washington, President
ITEM NO. 14
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: General Manager /Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Agreement Between the Temecula Community Services District and Willdan
Financial Services for Assessment Engineering Services
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Senior Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
1) Approve the Agreement between the Temecula Community Service District and Willdan
Financial Services for Assessment Engineering Services in the amount of $39,500.
BACKGROUND: On November 20, 2008 the Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) solicited a Request for Proposal (RFP) from assessment engineering firms. The RFP
asked firms to submit a proposal for providing TCSD with assessment engineering services. These
services consist of on -going monitoring and update of all assessable parcels within the District;
preparation of the annual TCSD levy report; printing and mailing of public hearing notices; the
annual submission and reconciliation of levy data to the County and other ancillary services related
to the levy of the Parks and Lighting Special Tax and to the TCSD Service Levels rates and
charges.
TCSD mailed six copies of the proposal to firms listed in the vendor list provided by the Finance
Department. The RFP was made available on the City's website.
TCSD received five (5) proposals, which were reviewed and ranked by a committee. Based on their
proposal content and fee amount one (1) firm was asked to prepare a presentation. Willdan
Financial Services, formally MuniFinancial, conducted the presentation to the committee on January
7, 2009.
After the presentation the committee determined that Willdan Financial Services was the most
qualified firm to provide the services requested. Willdan's offices are located in the same offices
that housed MuniFinancial in Temecula. MuniFinancial's key staff has remand with Willdan and will
continue to provide the same level of service that has been provided since 1991.
The term of this agreement is for one year with the ability to extend the contract for three (3) years.
In light of the economy Willdan has agreed not to apply an annual inflator during the term of this
agreement and has eliminated their processing fee for the administration of the public notices.
Historically, this is a savings of approximately $2,700.00 on an annual basis.
FISCAL IMPACT: The 2008 -2009 Operating Budget has already appropriated the funds
required for the reminder of this fiscal year.
ATTACHMENTS: Professional Services Agreement
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR ASSESSMENT
ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of February 10, 2009 between the
Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation (District and Willdan
Financial Services "Consultant) in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set
forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on February 10, 2009, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
December 31, 2009, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
The District may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for three one (1) year
additional terms. In no event shall the contract be extended beyond December 31, 2012.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set
forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons in
Consultant's profession engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant
hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
4. PREVAILING WAGES. This section does not apply for this agreement.
5. PAYMENT.
a. The District agrees to pay Consultant quarterly, in accordance with the
payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates
and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in
full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the
payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed
$39,500.00, thirty nine thousand five hundred dollars and no cents for the total term of the
Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in
connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth
herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the District
Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in
the manner as agreed to by District Manager and Consultant at the time District's written
authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services.
c. Consultant will submit invoices quarterly for services to be performed
during the upcoming quarter. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth
business day of each month, for services to be provided in the following quarter. Payment shall
be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non disputed fees. If the
District disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days
of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements
authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in
excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance.
6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause,
suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the
District suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall
not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
District shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of
termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the District. Upon termination of the
Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the District
pursuant to Section 5.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, District shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant
for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately
by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and
without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the District Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the District shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be
entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by District that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall
be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly
identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of
District or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give District the
right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit District to make transcripts there
from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and
activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be
maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
2
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing
data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of
providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole
property of the District and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the District without
the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for
the work, Consultant shall make available to the District, upon reasonable written request by the
District, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling,
transferring and printing computer files.
9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, District, and /or Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers
from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including
attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, District
and /or Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may
be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property to the extent
arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way
related to the performance or non performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising
out of the negligence of the District.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property,
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No.
2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no
automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above
is acceptable.
3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while
performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but
Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees.
4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form
providing professional liability for the Consultants profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily
injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply
separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required
occurrence limit.
3
2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury and property damage.
3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease.
and in aggregate.
4) Professional Liability coverage: One million ($1,000,000) per claim
c. Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the District Manager. At the option of the
District Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured
retentions as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the
Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations,
claim administration and defense expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
1) The District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to
be covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf
of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned,
occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the
Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection
afforded to the District, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the District, its officers, officials, employees
and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the District, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not
contribute with it.
3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the
policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the District, its
officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's
liability.
5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed
to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will
endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the District.
6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in
limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax,
and /or notify the District via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or
cancellation of the policy.
4
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the District. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the District with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to
be on forms provided by the District. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the
District before work commences. As an alternative to the District's forms, the Consultant's
insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including
endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the District a wholly
independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf
of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither
District nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the
conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth
in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of
its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the District.
Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever
against District, or bind District in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for
performing services hereunder for District. District shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement.
The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and
regulations. The District, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity
occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without Districts prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without
written authorization from the District Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney,
voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to
interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or
relating to any project or property located within the District. Response to a subpoena or court
order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives District notice of such court
order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify District should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena,
notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other
discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the
work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the District.
District retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and /or be present at any
deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with District and
to provide District with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by
Consultant. However, District's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the
right by District to control, direct, or rewrite said response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party
under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express,
that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States
Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the
party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice.
Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business
day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided
above.
To District via U.S. Mail:
To District via Courier Service:
To Consultant:
Temecula Community Services District
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589 -9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: District Manager
Willdan Financial Services
27368 Via Industria, Suite 110
Temecula, CA 92590
Attention: Josephine Perez -Moses
(951) 587 -3500
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the District. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be
payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be
otherwise agreed to in writing between the Temecula Community Services District Board and
the Consultant.
16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have
in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
6
17. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court
with geographic jurisdiction over the Temecula Community Services District. In the event such
litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the
prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney
fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the Temecula Community
Services District shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the
proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub contractors for this project, during his /her
tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the District
that no officer or employee of the Temecula Community Services District has any interest,
whether contractual, non contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the
business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub contractors on this project. Consultant further
agrees to notify the District in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such
interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is
entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon
each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has
the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT BOARD
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
(Insert Company Name, Address, Contact
Name, Phone and Fax Number Here)
By:
Name:
Title:
By:
Name:
Title:
[Signatures of Two Corporate Officers Required]
8
EXHIBIT "A"
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES
SPECIFICATIONS /SCOPE OF WORK
1. Coordinate with the Temecula Community Services District, County of Riverside and
other entities to obtain necessary information needed to provide the services requested.
This information may include Assessor's parcel maps and files, copies of secured rolls,
boundary maps, budget information, historical data, as well as other comparable data.
2. Review existing Method of Apportionment. In so doing, Consultant staff will address
staff concerns and to ensure equity throughout the District.
3. Coordinate with TCSD staff and the City's Franchise Waste Hauler in obtaining an
electronic listing of properties to be annually added to Service Level D. This information
will be reconciled with current County parcel data prior to the preliminary levy report.
Any properties that cannot be reconciled to a valid Assessor's Parcel Number will be
provided to both TCSD staff and the City's Franchise Waste Hauler. A final listing of
confirmed new parcels for Service Level D will be provided to the TCSD.
4. Confirm with TCSD the additional of new residential areas for Streetlight Maintenance
services. Review the TCSD staff the identification of new properties (tracts) for inclusion
to Service Levels B and C. Update administration database with pertinent information
for corresponding Assessor Parcel Numbers and service levels; identify any
inconsistencies in parcel counts. Since new developments are often identified for
inclusion long before the services are provided, Consultant will review and coordinate
the timing of the imposition of the applicable rates and charges with TCSD.
5. Provide TCSD with a list of the parcels within Service Level R Unpaved Street and
Road Maintenance. The Consultant will review and update the parcels within Service
Level R to insure accurate assessment rates.
6. Consultant will review and update all District parcels to insure proper assessment rates
of the Parks and Lighting Special Tax.
7. Assist with and attend public forums and public hearings, to discuss the District services,
budgets and any concerns generated by property owners in order to alleviate any
negative misconceptions, if so desired by TCSD.
8. Assist TCSD staff in preparing budgets by providing a preliminary EBU count in January
and the preliminary levy report in early April of each year. Provide comparison studies,
as requested by staff, to aid in the analysis of various methods of apportionment, benefit
to equity evaluations, EBU calculations and rates for all Service Levels and Special Park
Tax.
9. Prepare Preliminary Report for review by TCSD staff and modify as directed. This
includes but is not limited to: method of apportionment; description of the district and
service levels; budget and levy summary; district services and charges; changes and
modifications to the district; district budgets.
9
10. Consultant will prepare, print and mail the public hearing notices and explanatory
information in conjunction with adoption of the rates and charges. Upon TCSD staff
request, the Consultant toll -free telephone number may be included on the notice.
Consultant will manage the entire project to ensure that the notices are mailed as
required by Proposition 218.
11 Consultant will obtain any necessary documentation from TCSD staff (i.e.: signed
resolutions, letters of compliance with Proposition 218, Authorized Signature to Request
Changes to the Tax Roll, Correction of Fixed Charge letters, along with the annual
levies) and submit the documents and levy data in the required format and media to the
County before deadlines. Consultant will research County exceptions and resubmit the
revised parcel numbers and recalculated levy amounts to the County Assessor's Office.
Consultant will also notify TCSD of any County rejected parcels considered not
assessable on the tax roll.
12. Provide the TCSD with an "Affidavit of Mailing" of the Notices within two weeks of the
mailing.
13. Make all necessary adjustments for annexations into the District upon notification by the
TCSD.
13. Provide a Preliminary Levy Report to staff with the "Noticed" levy amounts for each
assessor's parcel number in April. Provide the Applied Levy Report and Compact Disc
(CD) to staff with a listing of all "Applied" levy amounts for each assessor's parcel
number and information requested by TCSD including acreage; land use codes; TCSD
Service Levels; number of dwelling units; EBU values; situs address; track number and
property owner information by October.
14. Provide a computer printout and CD of all properties assessed for Service Level D
(Refuse /Recycling Collection Services) in a format as requested by the franchised hauler
by October.
15. Provide all the same services as called out in this agreement for areas which may at
some time in the future be annexed into TCSD. Any significant change to the District
structure or to the parcels included within the District, including annexations to the City,
may result in additional fees. These additional fees will be addressed in a contractual
amendment /addendum.
17. Assist TCSD staff in the reconciliation of levied parcels in Service Levels B, C, D, R and
the Park Special Tax with the number of charged parcels. Provide the TCSD with a levy
summary letter that addresses any significant variances between the proposed budgets
and the applied tax roll levy.
18. Assist with appeals procedure; and make necessary revisions to the database as
directed by TCSD staff.
19. Assist TCSD, as necessary, in addressing property owners or residents with questions
about TCSD charges on property tax bills, noticing procedures, assessment districts and
other related issues.
10
20. Assist TCSD with an audit of special cases pertaining to the Park Special Tax
Assessment at least once within the duration of the contract.
11
Exhibit B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
The following fixed fees and schedule of quarterly payments shall be in effect for the scope of
services as set forth in Sections 2 and 5 of the Agreement.
2009
5,250.00
5,250.00
5,250.00
5,250.00
Assessment Services $21,000.00
January Quarter
April Quarter
July Quarter
October Quarter
Reimbursable Exp
(Not to Exceed)
Public Notices
Contract Total
Amount
2,000.00
$16,500.00
$39,500.00
The reasonable cost of reports, reproduction, County data tapes, assessor's parcel information
and other "out of pocket" expenses provided by the consultant are included in this contract in
the $2,000.00 per year reimbursable expenses listed above.
Public Notices
Reimbursable expenses not included under this contract are: coordination, production, postage
and mailing of resident notices. TCSD will reimburse consultant, under separate purchase
order, for previously approved costs associated with these services, including processing,
reproductions, materials, and service charges incurred by the consultant.
Estimated cost for the mailing of public notices including postage is $16,500.00 and shall be
payable after the "Affidavit of Mailing" and invoice with back up from the printers and post office
is provided to TCSD. Upon the Consultant's request, a check for postage will be provided by
the District prior to the mailing.
12
Due
Upon Completion of Contract
March, 2009
June, 2009
September, 2009
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM NO. 15
ACTION MINUTES
of
JANUARY 27, 2009
City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting convened at 7:37 PM.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Ron Roberts
ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Washington,
Roberts
RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were no public comments.
RDA CONSENT CALENDAR
16 Action Minutes Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Agency Member
Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero;
Agency Member Washington abstained; and electronic vote reflected approval.
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Approve the action minutes of January 13, 2009.
RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT
RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS
RDA ADJOURNMENT
At 7:38 p.m., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, February 10, 2009, at 5:30 p.m. for a Closed Session with regular session
commencing at 7:00 p.m., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk /Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
Ron Roberts, Chairperson
PUBLIC HEARING
ITEM NO. 16
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Approval for levying an assessment for fiscal year 2009 -2010 in connection with
the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (TVTBID)
PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Revenue Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Conduct a public hearing to consider protests regarding the levy of an assessment in
conjunction with the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District.
2. Instruct the City Clerk to tabulate any written protests which might be received prior to the
close of the public hearing regarding the formation of the proposed District.
3. If the City Clerk reports that there is not a majority protest received regarding this District,
then adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2009 -10 IN CONNECTION WITH THE TEMECULA VALLEY
TOURISM BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (TVTBID)
BACKGROUND: On September 27, 2005, the City Council considered a request from
the Temecula Valley Convention and Visitor's Bureau (CONVIS) to form a Tourism Business
Improvement District to promote tourism in the Temecula Valley. As part of its consideration of this
item, the City Council held a public meeting on November 8, 2005, to receive further information
regarding the intended purpose and operation of the District. All sixteen of the potentially affected
lodging establishments were notified and three representatives of Temecula hotels spoke to urge
formation of the District.
On December 13, 2005, a Public Hearing was held to consider protests regarding the formation of
the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District. A majority protest was not received
and, therefore, Council enacted an ordinance establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business
Improvement District (TVTBID). Also adopted were resolutions to levy an assessment for FY
2006/07 in the TVTBID, and resolutions to establish an advisory board for the TVTBID. A
Management Agreement between the City of Temecula and the CONVIS was also approved for the
operation and administration of the TVTBID.
The annual levy represents 2% of the room rates collected. These funds are expended for the
purpose of marketing and promotions to increase tourism and market the Temecula Valley area as a
tourist destination to the benefit of lodging businesses located and operating within the boundaries
of the District.
According to the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989 (the Law), the City Council is
authorized to annually undertake proceedings to levy an assessment against businesses within the
TVTBID. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the TVTBID Advisory Board has prepared
and filed with the City Clerk a report for FY 2009 -10. The report, which was presented to City
Council and approved on January 27, 2009, thoroughly details the proposed budget and activities,
and programs and events for the District for the coming year. After approving the report, City
Council adopted Resolution No. 09 -07 to declare its intention to levy an assessment against lodging
businesses for Fiscal Year 2009 -10 within the District, and to set the time and place of a Public
Hearing.
At this Public Hearing, testimony will be heard and protests may be made by any person with an
interest in the proposed levy. I n the absence of a majority protest, it is recommended that the City
Council adopt the resolution to levy the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2009 -10 (March 1, 2009
through February 28, 2010).
FISCAL IMPACT: It is anticipated that the 2% annual assessment would result in the
collection of approximately$528,000 in Fiscal Year 2009 -10, which would be used by the CONVIS
for the promotion of tourism. The City would receive up to 2% of the assessments, or approximately
$10,560, to offset administrative costs. For the twelve month period beginning December 2007
through November 2008, the City of Temecula received $11,472 for administrative costs.
ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 09-
RESOLUTION NO. 09-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2009 -2010 IN CONNECTION WITH THE
TEMECULA VALLEY TOURISM BUSINESS
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989,
California Streets and Highways Code Section 36500 et seq. (the "Act authorizes the
City Council (the "City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City to levy an
assessment against businesses within a parking and business improvement area which
is in addition to any assessments, fees, charges, or taxes imposed in the City.
Section 2. Pursuant to the Act, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 05 -16
establishing the Temecula Valley Tourism Business Improvement District (the "District
in the City.
Section 3. The boundaries of the District are the boundaries of the City and
include all lodging businesses therein (as defined in Temecula Municipal Code Section
3.40.020).
Section 4. In accordance with Section 36533 of the Law, the Advisory Board
for the District prepared and filed with the City Clerk reports entitled "08 Annual Report"
and "09 Annual Report: Budget and Marketing Plan" (the "Reports and on January
27, 2009, Resolution No. 09 -06, the City Council preliminarily approved such Report as
filed.
Section 5. On January 27, 2009, the City Council adopted its Resolution of
Intention, Resolution No. 09 -07, declaring its intention to levy and collect an assessment
for fiscal year 2009 -2010 (March 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010) against lodging
businesses in the District.
Section 6. Following notice duly given pursuant to law, the City Council has
held a full and fair public hearing regarding the levy and collection of an assessment
within the District for fiscal year 2009 -2010. At the public hearing, the testimony of all
interested persons regarding the levy of an assessment against lodging businesses
within the District for fiscal year 2009 -2010 was heard and considered. The City
Council hereby determines that there was no majority protest within the meaning of the
Act.
Section 7. Based upon its review of the Report, a copy of which has been presented
to the City Council and which has been filed with the City Clerk, and other reports and
information presented to the City, the City Council hereby finds and determines that (1)
the lodging businesses in the District will be benefited by the expenditure of funds
raised by the assessment for fiscal year 2009 -2010, (11) the District includes all of the
businesses so benefited; and (iii) the net amount of the assessment levied within the
District for fiscal year 2009 -2010 in accordance with Resolution No. 09 -07, the Report,
and Chapter 3.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code is apportioned by a formula and
method which fairly distributes the net amount in proportion to the estimated benefits to
be received by each such lodging business.
Section 8. The City Council hereby confirms the Report as originally filed.
Section 9. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the levy of an
assessment for fiscal year 2009 -2010. The assessment formula is set forth in Chapter
3.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code. Assessments shall be paid in monthly
installments.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10th day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 09- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the
following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
COUNCIL BUSINESS
ITEM NO. 17
Approvals
City Attorney
Director of Finance
City Manager
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager /City Council
FROM: Jerry Williams, Chief of Police
DATE: February 10, 2009
SUBJECT: Sex Offender Ordinance (At the Request of Mayor Maryann Edwards)
PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 09-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.60 "SEX
OFFENDERS TO TITLE 9 "PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND
WELFARE OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH LOCAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SEX OFFENDERS
BACKGROUND: The City Council is firmly committed to protecting the safety of children
and citizens from convicted sex offenders. In accordance with Proposition 83, Jessica's Law, the
City Council is authorized to enact the attached Ordinance. Section 9.60.030 of the proposed
ordinance provides that no sex offender shall reside within a two thousand (2,000) foot radius of any
child day care center, park, or school.
The proposed ordinance defines child day care center, park, school, and sex offender. "Child day
care center" means a licensed facility that provides non medical care on a less than 24 -hour basis to
children in need of personal services, supervision or assistance essential for sustaining the activities
of daily living or for the protection of the individual. "Child day care center" does not include a "family
day care home" as that term is defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78.
"Park" means an open space intended for recreational use where children regularly gather. "School"
means the buildings and grounds of any public or private school used for the education of children in
kindergarten or in grades 1 through 12, inclusive. "Sex offender" means any person for whom
registration is required pursuant to Section 290 of the California Penal Code, regardless of whether
that person is on parole or probation.
The proposed ordinance also provides that the residency requirements for sex offenders will not
apply in the following circumstances: (1) The sex offender established the residency prior to the
effective date of the ordinance; and (2) the sex offender established the residency prior to the initial
operation of the child day care center, park, or school.
The intent of this ordinance is not to punish sex offenders for their prior legal conduct. The intent of
this ordinance is to create a regulatory and non punitive scheme to protect children at child day care
centers, parks and schools in Temecula. This ordinance will further the City's compelling interest in
protecting the victims and potential victims of sex offenders in the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no anticipated fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 09-
ORDINANCE NO. 09-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.60 "SEX
OFFENDERS TO TITLE 9 "PUBLIC PEACE, MORALS AND
WELFARE OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ESTABLISH LOCATION RESTRICTIONS FOR SEX
OFFENDERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council is gravely concerned about the high rate of
recidivism among convicted sex offenders and their dangerousness as a class. The
City Council takes legislative notice of the fact that, based on U.S. Department of
Justice statistics, several members of the U.S. Supreme Court recently concluded:
"When convicted sex offenders reenter society, they are much more likely than any
other type of offender to be rearrested for a new rape or sexual assault." [McKune v.
Lile, 536 U.S. 24, 33 (2002).]
Section 2. On November 7, 2006, the people of the State of California enacted
the Sexual Predator Punishment and Control Act: Jessica's Law (also known as
Proposition 83). That initiative measure: (1) increases penalties for violent and habitual
sex offenders and child molesters; (ii) prohibits sex offenders from residing within 2,000
feet of any school or park; (iii) requires lifetime Global Positioning System monitoring of
felony registered sex offenders; (iv) expands the definition of a sexually violent predator;
and (v) changes the system for involuntary civil commitment of sexually violent
predators. Additionally, that initiative measure authorizes municipalities to enact
ordinances that further restrict the locations where registered sex offenders may reside.
Section 3. The City has a compelling governmental interest in protecting the
victims and potential victims of sex offenders in its jurisdiction. The City Council finds
that the sex offender location restrictions imposed by this Ordinance are a reasonable
means of promoting that governmental interest.
Section 4. This Ordinance is enacted by the City Council pursuant to Jessica's
Law and pursuant to the City of Temecula's general police power to provide for the
public health, safety and general welfare.
Section 5. In enacting this Ordinance, the City Council does not intend to
punish sex offenders for their prior illegal conduct. Rather, the purpose of this
Ordinance is to create a regulatory and non punitive scheme to protect children at child
day care centers, parks, and schools in Temecula.
Section 6. The City Council has determined that it can be seen with certainty
that there is no possibility that the adoption and implementation of this Ordinance may
have a significant effect on the environment. The Ordinance is therefore exempt from
the environmental review requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act
"CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of
Regulations (the "CEQA Guidelines
Section 7. Title 9 "Public Peace, Morals and Welfare of the Temecula
Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new Chapter 9.60 "Sex Offenders to
read as follows:
"Chapter 9.60 SEX OFFENDERS
9.60.010 Short Title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Temecula Sex Offender
Ordinance."
9.60.020 Definitions.
For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
A. "Adult" means a person over the age of 18 years.
B. "Child" means a person under the age of 18 years.
C. "Child day care center" means a licensed facility that provides non medical
care on a less than 24 -hour basis to children in need of personal services, supervision
or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of
the individual. "Child day care center" does not include a "family day care home" as that
term is defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 1596.78.
D. "Park" means an open space intended for recreational use where children
regularly gather.
E. "School" means the buildings and grounds of any public or private school
used for the education of children in kindergarten or in grades 1 through 12, inclusive.
F. "Sex offender" means any person for whom registration is required
pursuant to Section 290 of the California Penal Code, regardless of whether that person
is on parole or probation.
9.60.030 Residency Restriction.
No sex offender shall reside within a two thousand (2,000) foot radius of any
child day care center, park, or school.
9.60.040 Exceptions.
Section 9.60.030 shall not apply in any of the following circumstances:
A. The sex offender established the residency prior to the effective date of
this chapter.
B. The sex offender established the residency prior to the initial operation of
the child day care center, park, or school.
9.60.050 Penalties.
A. Any person violating any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished as set forth in Chapter 1.20 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
B. Any person who violates any provision of this Chapter shall also be
subject to the enforcement remedies of Chapters 1.21 and 1.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code. Peace officers of the Riverside County Sheriffs Department or such
other police agency under contract to provide police services to the City shall be
authorized to issue citations or take such enforcement action as authorized by Chapters
1.21 and 1.24."
Section 8. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of
this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and
independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions hereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this
Ordinance, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof,
irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses
or phrases had been declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and
cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 10th day of February, 2009.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
ss
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 09- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 10th day of February,
2009, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City
of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 10th day of February, 2009, by the following
vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk