HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-11 CC Ordinance- ORDINANCE NO. 92-11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE SEIZURE, IMPOUNDMENT
AND TERMINATION OF OWNERSHIP RIGHTS IN ABANDONED,
NEGLECTED, OR CRUELLY TREATED ANIMALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
on February 27, 1990.
630.
The City Council of the City of Temecula, adopted Ordinance No. 90-04
Said Ordinance, adopted by reference, Riverside County Ordinance No.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 597.1, Subdivision (e), the City
of Temecula hereby determines that California Penal Code Section 597.1 shall be operative in the
City of Temecula and that Penal Code Section 597f shall not be operative.
SECTION 3. Any dog, cat or other animal which is abandoned, neglected, sick, lame,
feeble, is unfit for the labor it is performing, or that in any manner is being cruelly treated may
be impounded and disposed of in a humane manner as hereinafter provided.
SECTION 4. Whenever any peace officer or animal control officer has reasonable
grounds to believe that very prompt action is required to protect the health or safety of the animal
or the health or safety of others, the officer shall immediately seize the animal and comply with
the procedure established in Section 5 of this Ordinance. In all other cases, the officer shall
comply with the provisions of Section 6 of this Ordinance. The cost of caring for and treating any
animal properly seized under this Ordinance shall constitute a lien on the animal and the animal
shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid, unless the hearing officer determines
that the seizure was unjustified.
SECTION 5. Whenever an animal control officer or peace officer seizes or impounds an
animal based on a reasonable belief that prompt action is required to protect the health or safety
of the animal or the health or safety of others, the officer shall, prior to the commencement of any
criminal proceedings provide the owner or keeper of the animal, if known or ascertained after
reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for a post seizure hearing as hereinafter provided
to determine the validity of the seizure or impoundment, or both.
Ords 92-11 -1-
1. The Health Department shall cause a notice to be affixed to a conspicuous place where
the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice of the seizure or impoundment, or both, to
the owner or keeper within 48 hours, excluding weekends and holidays. The notice shall include
all of the following:
notice.
a. The name, business address, and telephone number of the officer providing the
b. A description of the animal seized, including any identification upon the animal,
c. The authority and purpose for the seizure, or impoundment, including the time,
place, and circumstances under which the animal was seized.
d. A statement that, in order to receive a post seizure hearing, the owner or person
authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing and
returning an enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep the animal to the Health
Department within 10 days, including weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice. The
declaration may be returned by personal delivery or mail.
e. A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized
under this section is a lien on the animal and that the animal shall not be returned to the owner
until the charges are paid, and that failure to request or to attend a scheduled heating shall result
in liability for this cost.
2. The post seizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours of the request, excluding
weekends and holidays. The hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 10 of this Ordinance.
3. Failure of the owner or keeper, or of his or her agent, to request a hearing within the
prescribed time period, or to attend a scheduled hearing, shall result in forfeiture of any right to
a post seizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred.
4. The Health Department, or law enforcement agency that directed the seizure shall be
responsible for the costs incurred for caring and treating the animal, if it is determined in the post
seizure hearing that the seizing officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe every prompt
action, including seizure of the animal, was required to protect the health or safety of the animal
or the health or safety of others. If it is determined the seizure was justified, the owner or keeper
shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the costs of the seizure and care of the animal,
and the animal shall not be returned to its owner until the charges are paid and the sizing agency
or hearing officer has determined that the animal is physically fit or the owner demonstrates to the
seizing agency's or the heating officer's satisfaction that the owner can and will provide the
necessary care.
Ords 92-11 -2-
SECTION 6. Where the need for immediate seizure is not present and prior to the
commencement of any criminal proceedings the Health Officer shall provide the owner or keeper
of the animals, if known or ascertainable after reasonable investigation, with the opportunity for
a hearing prior to any seizure or impoundment of the animal. The owner shall produce the animal
at the time of the heating unless, prior to the heating, the owner has made arrangements with the
agency to view the animal upon request of the agency, or unless the owner can provide
verification that the animal was humanely destroyed. Any person who willfully fails to produce
the animal or provide the verification is guilty of an infraction, punishable by a fine of not less
than two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) no more than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00).
1. The Health Department or law enforcement agency shall cause a notice to be affixed
to a conspicuous place where the animal was situated or personally deliver a notice stating the
grounds for believing the animal should be seized. The notice shall include all of the following:
notice.
a. The name, business address and telephone number of the officer providing the
b. A description of the animal to be seized, including any identification upon the
c. The authority and purpose for the possible seizure or impoundment.
d. A statement that, in order to receive a hearing prior to any seizure, the owner
or person authorized to keep the animal, or his or her agent, shall request the hearing by signing
and returning the enclosed declaration of ownership or right to keep animal to the officer
providing the notice within two days, excluding weekends and holidays, of the date of the notice.
e. A statement that the cost of caring for and treating any animal properly seized
is a lien on the animal, that any animal seized shall not be returned to the owner until the charges
are paid, and that failure to request a heating within the prescribed time period, or to attend a
scheduled hearing shall result in a conclusive determination that the animal may properly be seized
and that the owner shall be liable for the charges.
2. The preseizure hearing shall be conducted within 48 hours, excluding weekends and
holidays, after receipt of this request. The heating shall be conducted in accordance with the
procedure established in Section 10 of this Ordinance.
3. Failure of the owner or keeper, or his or her agent, to request a hearing within the
prescribed time, period or to attend a scheduled heating, shall result in a forfeiture of any right
to a preseizure hearing or right to challenge his or her liability for costs incurred pursuant to this
Ordinance.
Ords 92-11 -3-
SECTION 7. If any animal is properly seized under this Ordinance, the owner or keeper
shall be personally liable to the seizing agency for the cost of the seizure and care of the animal.
FtLrthermore, if the charges for the seizure or impoundment and any other charges permitted under
this Ordinance are not paid within 14 days of the seizure, or, if the owner, within 14 days of
notice of availability of the animal to be returned, fails to pay charges permitted under this
Ordinance and take possession of the animal, the animal shall be deemed to have been abandoned
and may be disposed of by the impounding officer.
SECTION 8. If the animal requires veterinary care and the seizing agency is not assured,
within 14 days of the seizure of the animal, that the owner will provide the necessary care, the
animal shall not be returned to its owner and shall be deemed to have been abandoned and may
be disposed of by the impounding officer. A veterinarian may humanely destroy an impounded
animal without regard to the prescribed holding period when it has been determined that the
animal has incurred severe injuries or is incurably ill or crippled. A veterinarian also may
immediately humanely destroy an impounded animal afflicted with a serious contagious disease
unless the owner or his or her agent immediately authorizes treatment of the animal by a
veterinarian at the expense of the owner or agent.
SECTION 9. No animal properly seized under this Ordinance shall be returned to its
owner until, in the determination of the seizing agency or hearing officer, the animal is physically
fit or the owner can demonstrate to the seizing ageney's or hearing officer's satisfaction that the
owner can and will provide the necessary care.
SECTION 10. All hearings conducted pursuant to this Ordinance shall be conducted by
the Health Officer or his designee (Hearing Officer), who shall not have been directly involved
in the subject action and shall not be subordinate in rank to the person seizing or impounding the
animal. Hearings shall be conducted in the following manner:
1. The Hearing Officer may continue the hearing for a reasonable period of time, if the
Hearing Officer deems such continuance to be necessary and proper or if the owner or custodian
shows good cause for such continuance.
2. The Health Department shall have the burden of proof to establish, by a preponderance
of evidence, the existence of the condition or conditions which give rise to the need for the seizure
or impoundment.
3. In a case where the Department is also seeking to terminate the owner's rights in the
animal, the Department shall have put the owner or keeper of the animal on due written notice
thereof and shall establish the existence of the owner's or keeper's acts or omissions resulting in
cruelty or neglect to the animal be clear and convincing evidence to a reasonable certainly.
Ords 92-11 -4-
4. The Department shall present its case first, followed by the party against whom the
seizure or impoundment is being proposed. The Department may present rebuttal in the discretion
of the Heating Officer.
5. Oral evidence shall be taken only on oath or affirmation.
6. Each party shall have the right to call and examine witnesses, to introduce exhibits, to
cross-examine opposing witnesses on any other matter relevant to the issues even though that
matter was not covered in the direct examination, to impeach any witness regardless of which
party first called the witness, and to rebut evidence.
7. The hearing need not be conducted according to technical rules relating to evidence and
witnesses. Any relevant evidence shall be admitted if it is the sort of evidence on which
responsible persons are accustomed to rely in the conduct of serious affairs, regardless of the
existence of any common law or statutory rule which might make improper the admission of such
evidence over objection in civil actions. Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of
supplementing or explaining other evidence, but shall not b e sufficient in itself to support a
finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions. The rules of privilege shall
be effective to the extent that they are otherwise required by statute to be recognized in the
hearing. Irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence shall be excluded.
8. At the conclusion of the hearing, each side shall be given an opportunity to summarize
its position.
9. Within three O) working days after the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer
shall render, in writing, his findings, decision and order thereon, and shall give notice, in writing,
of said findings, decision and order to the owner or custodian of the animal.
10. In the event a sufficient Quantum of evidence presented at the heating supports a
determination for seizure, impoundment, and/or termination of the owner's rights in the animal,
the Hearing Officer as a part of his decision may order, but is not limited to ordering, that one
or more of the following actions be undertaken:
terminated.
a. That the owner's and/or custodian's rights in the dog, cat or other animal are
b. That the owner or custodian of the dog, cat or other animal shall remove the
animal(s) from the premises by a specified date.
c. That the Health Depamnent personnel after a specified date, shall impound the
animal or animals.
Ords 92-11 -5-
d. That the Health Department shall sell, give away, or otherwise dispose of, the
animal(s) with the owner or custodian of the animal(s) being responsible to reimburse the City for
all costs and expenses including, but not limited to, board, care, veterinary services, and costs of
disposal. If the animal(s) are sold, the proceeds from the sale shall go to the City or agency as
designated by the City.
11. A decision upholding seizure or impoundment shall become effective upon issuance.
12. A decision terminating an owner's rights in the animal shall become effective 30 days
from the date the decision is mailed unless a stay of execution is granted.
SECTION 11. Every such, disabled, infn'm or crippled animal, except a dog or cat,
abandoned in any part of the City of Temecula, County of Riverside may be immediately killed
by the Health Department of law enforcement agency or their designees if, after a reasonable
search, no owner of the animal can be located. It shall be the duty of all peace officers and animal
control officers to cause the animal to be killed or rehabilitated and placed in a suitable home on
information that the animal is stray or abandoned.
SECTION 12. Any peace officer, humane society officer, or animal control officer shall
convey all injured cats and dogs found without their owners in a public place directly to a
veterinarian known by the officer to be a veterinarian who ordinarily treats dogs and cats for a
determination of whether the animal shall be immediately and humanely destroyed or shall be
hospitalized under proper care and given emergency treatment.
If the owner does not redeem the animal within the locally prescribed waiting period, the
veterinarian may personally perform euthanasia on the animal. If the animal is treated and
recovers from its injuries, the veterinarian may keep the animal for purposes of adoption, provided
the responsible animal control agency has first been contacted and has refused to take possession
of the animal.
Whenever any animal is transferred to a veterinarian in a clinic, such as an emergency
clinic which is not in continuous operation, the veterinarian may, in turn, transfer the animal to
an appropriate facility.
If the veterinarian determines that the animal shall be hospitalized under proper care and
given emergency treatment, the costs of any services which are provided pending the owner's
inquiry to the responsible agency or department shall be paid from the dog license fees, fines, and
fees from impounding dogs in the city, county, or city and county in which the animal was
licensed or, if the animal is unlicensed, shall be paid by the jurisdiction in which the animal was
found, subject to the provision that this costs be repaid by the animal's owner. The costs of caring
for and treating any animal seized under this Section shall constitute a lien on the animal and the
Ord8 92-11 -6-
animal shall not be returned to the owner until the charges are paid. No veterinarian shall be
criminally or civilly liable for any decision which he or she makes or for services which he or she
provides pursuant to this section.
An animal control agency which takes possession of an animal pursuant to Section 11 of
this Ordinance shall keep records of the whereabouts of the animal for a 72-hour period from the
time of possession, and those records shall be available for inspection by the public upon request.
SECTION 13. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any peace officer or
any animal control officer may, with the approval of his or her immediate superior, humanely
destroy any stray or abandoned animal in the field in any case where the animal is too severely
injured to move or where a veterinarian is not available and it would be more humane to dispose
of the animal.
SECTION 14. Every owner, driver or keeper of any animal who permits the animal to
be in any building, enclosure, lane, street, square or lot within the City of Temecula area of
Riverside County, without proper care of attention shall be guilty of an infraction or misdemeanor
as hereinafter specified. Such individual shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense of each and
every day or portion thereof during which any violation of any of the provisions of this Ordinance
is committed, continued or permitted. Any individual convicted a violation of this Ordinance shall
be:
1. guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred
dollars ($100.00) for a first violation;
2. guilty of an infraction offense and punished by a fine not exceeding two hundred
dollars ($200.00) for a second violation. The third and any additional violations shall constitute
a misdemeanor offense and shall be punishable by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars
($1,000.00) or six (6) months in jail, or both. Notwithstanding the above, a first offense may be
charged and prosecuted as a misdemeanor. Payment of any penalty herein shall not relieve an
individual from the responsibility for correcting the violation.
SECTION 15. Upon the conviction of a person charged with a violation of this ordinance,
all animals lawfully seized and impounded with respect to the violation shall be adjudged by the
court to be forfeited and shall thereupon be transferred to the impounding officer for proper
disposition. A person convicted of a violation of this Ordinance shall be personally liable to the
seizing agency from all costs of impoundment from the time of seizure to the time for proper
disposition. This Ordinance shall not prohibit the seizure or impoundment of animals as evidence
as provided for under any other provision of law.
SECTION 16. This Ordinance is not intended, nor shall it be construed in any way, to
affect Sections 31101 or 31752 of the Food and Agriculture Code.
Ords 92-11 -7-
SECTION 17. Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this
Ordinance, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications of the provisions of this Ordinance
which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application and, to this end, the
provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable.
SECTION 18. Section 13 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 630 adopted by reference
in Ordinance No. 904)4 on February 27, 1990, is hereby repealed.
SECTION 19. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this
Ordinance to be posted and published as required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of May, 1992.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Ords 92-11 -8-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 92-11 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting
of the City Council on the 12th day of May, 1992 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly
adopted and tntssed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of May, 1992, by the
following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
Ords 92-11 -9-