HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-016 CC Resolution ' RESOLUTION NO. 10 -16
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ADDENDUM TO A
CERTIFIED FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
AND ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE SANTA
MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION NO. 2 OF
APPROXIMATELY 4,510 ACRES, LOCATED
IMMEDIATELY SOUTHWEST OF THE EXISTING CITY OF
TEMECULA BOUNDARY LINE, WEST OF INTERSTATE -
15 AND NORTH OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND
RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOUNDARY (LR09 -0024)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08 -110
' certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Santa Margarita Area
Annexation (No. 1), a proposed expansion of the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence
and Annexation to the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District
of approximately 4,997 acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula
Boundary line, west of Interstate -15. The City Council also adopted findings pursuant to
the California Environmental Quality Act, adopted a statement of overriding
considerations and adopted a mitigation monitoring and reporting program in connection
therewith (collectively, "Certified Final Environmental Impact Report" or "Certified Final
EIR ").
B. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 08 -111
and 08 -112 to apply to the Local Agency Formation Commission ( "LAFCO ") for an
expansion of the City of Temecula's Sphere of Influence and Annexation to the City of
Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District of approximately 4,997 acres
located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula Boundary line, west of
Interstate -15 ( "Santa Margarita Annexation Area ")
C. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 08 -113
amending the General Land Use Map within the Santa Margarita Area Annexation,
contingent upon LAFCO's approval of the annexation.
D. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 08 -14
' prezoning the territory of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation, contingent upon
LAFCO's approval of the annexation.
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 1
' E. On December 9, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 08 -15
amending the official zoning map of the City of Temecula by adopting zoning
designations Hillside -Santa Margarita (SM) and Open Space Conservation District —
Santa Margarita (OS -C -SM) and adopting Hillside Development Standards for the Santa
Margarita Area Annexation, contingent upon LAFCO's approval of the annexation.
F. Thereafter, the City of Temecula submitted to LAFCO a Sphere of
Influence Amendment Application and Annexation Application along with requisite
application submittal documents in connection therewith for the Santa Margarita Area
Annexation proposal ( "LAFCO Applications ").
G. On May 12, 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 09 -42
confirming that the proposal for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation was pursuant to
the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000,
commencing with Section 56000 of the California Government Code.
H. On June 4, 2009, LAFCO denied the LAFCO Applications made by the
City for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 1 proposal and approved the City's
Municipal Service Review; and adopted resolutions in connection therewith on June 25,
2009.
I. On July 23, 2009, the City of Temecula submitted an Application for
' Reconsideration by LAFCO of the LAFCO Applications for the Santa Margarita Area
Annexation No. 1 proposal. The City's proposal removed approximately 487 acres of
the southeast corner of the uninhabited 4,997 -acre Santa Margarita Area Annexation
territory, and included revised boundaries of the Sphere of Influence expansion from
4,443 acres to 4,126 acres to match the boundaries of the area to be annexed to the
City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District comprising of 4,510
acres of that certain uninhabited territory located immediately southwest of the City of
Temecula boundary line, west of Interstate 15, and north of the San Diego /Riverside
County boundary as depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A, and
incorporated herein as though set forth in full ( "Santa Margarita Area Annexation No.
2 ").
J. On September 24, 2009 LAFCO denied the City's Application for
Reconsideration and determined the City of Temecula must file a new LAFCO Sphere
of Influence Amendment Application and a new LAFCO Annexation Application to
proceed with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal.
K. On December 3, 2009 LAFCO voted unanimously to waive the one -year
waiting period to allow the City to proceed with LAFCO Sphere of Influence Amendment
and Annexation Applications for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal
and LAFCO approved a reduction in the application fees by fifty percent.
' L. On January 12, 2010, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10 -03
authorizing the preparation of documents and actions necessary to proceed with a
Sphere of Influence Amendment and Annexation Application for the Santa Margarita
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 2
' Area Annexation No. 2 proposal pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000 commencing with Section 56000 of the
California Government Code.
M. The City of Temecula proceeded with the preparation of documents
associated with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal including a
General Plan amendment to the Land Use Map, zoning amendment to Title 17 of the
Temecula Municipal Code including hillside development standards and pre - zoning
designations, and Sphere of influence and Annexation applications (LR09 -0024) in a
manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Municipal Code and are
hereby incorporated by reference, for the property consisting of approximately 4,510
acres located immediately southwest of the City of Temecula boundary, west of
Interstate 15 and north of the San Diego County /Riverside County boundary referred to
as the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 proposal (collectively, the "Amendment ").
N. The Amendment was processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the
California Environmental Quality Act and pursuant to the Cortese - Knox - Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of 2000 commencing with section 56000 of the
California Government Code.
O. An Addendum to the Certified Final EIR was prepared for the Santa
Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 ( "Addendum ") in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
( "CEQA ") to address the reduced boundaries of the annexation area.
P. The Planning Commission considered the Addendum to the Certified Final
EIR and the various components of the Amendment on February 3, 2010, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its
report and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter.
Q. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the
public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission
adopted Resolution No 10 -02 recommending that the City Council approve the
Addendum to the Certified Final EIR attached hereto as Exhibit B and the various
components of the Amendment, reaffirm the findings adopted as part of the Final EIR
certification and set forth in Exhibit of Resolution No. 08 -110 as remaining applicable
to the Revised Annexation project, adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations as
set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit D and
incorporated herein by reference and adopt Findings pursuant to the California
Environmental Quality Act. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No 10-
03 thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions related to the
' Annexation of the Santa Margarita Annexation No. 2.
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 3
' R. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
S. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is custodian
of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of
proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City
Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590.
Section 2. The City Council has considered the Addendum to the Certified
Final Environmental Impact Report, along with the Certified Final Environmental Impact
Report, and approves the Addendum to the Certified Final Environmental Impact Report
attached hereto as Exhibit B, adopts the following findings, and takes the following
actions pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act:
A. The City Council has reviewed the Addendum to the Certified Final EIR,
along with the Certified Final EIR and; in the exercise of its independent judgment,
concludes that the Addendum accurately describes the environmental ramifications of
reducing the area for which Annexation to the City is sought.
B. The City Council finds, based on the evidence in the record, including the
Addendum, that the Revised Annexation proposal does not require supplemental or
subsequent environmental review because the Revised Annexation area (i) is not a
substantial change in the project that would require major revisions to the previously
' Certified Final EIR, (ii) is not a substantial change in the circumstances under which the
project is being undertaken that would require major revisions to the Certified Final EIR,
and (iii) does not constitute new information of substantial importance that was not
known at the time the Final EIR was certified.
C. The Revised Annexation area is approximately 487 acres smaller than the
previously proposed annexation area. If the Revised Annexation is approved by
LAFCO, the impacts associated with the annexation would be the same or less than
those identified in the Final EIR for the reasons set forth in the Addendum.
D. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California, exercising its
independent judgment after considering the administrative record, hereby adopts the
Addendum to the Certified Final EIR, attached hereto as Exhibit B, reaffirms the findings
adopted as part of the Final EIR certification and set forth in Exhibit A of Resolution No.
08 -110 as remaining applicable to the Revised Annexation project, adopts the
Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program attached hereto as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. Further,
the City Council imposes each mitigation measure as a condition on the Revised
Annexation project, and directs City staff to implement and monitor the mitigation
measures as described in Exhibit D.
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 4
' PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 23 day of February, 2010.
Jeff Comerchero, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan . Jo es, MMC
City Cle k
[SEAL]
1
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10 -16 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of
the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23 day of February, 2010, by the
following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington,
Comerchero
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
' Susan .Jones, MMC
City Clerk
1
R: /Resos 2010 /Resos 10 -16 6
4
i'�F�rR�a KAI
�.
y�
o A ea°a.►�� 1 h
c � @XV
a �. ,x:aYerF�y®d �r�Pm1�. W.
11, AW
pot
i ?swi q �,���
PAR
ilk ♦
CAM
PAP
Wil
rb
IN
�►
r
t om,, ..����i��..�► .• ...
1
ADDENDUM TO THE
SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION
Environmental Impact Report / Addendum
Prepared for: January 2010
r _—' tyt .. J R • �. . ? 4 �. fi" t y � � , r ` ` a +.' .,T: � �
City of Temecula
EXHI'BlT "B" ESA
..A
1
ADDENDUM TO THE
SANTA MARGARITA AREA ANNEXATION
Environmental Impact Report / Addendum
Prepared for: January 2010
City of Ternecula
9191 lovme Centre Drive
SUIe 340
San Diego, CA 92122
&59.639.0900
vrmv.esaesoc,corn
Los Angeles
Oataana
PotaWma
Penl&M
Sac an to
San Francisco
Soaltle
T-Pa
Moaiana I Ills
1 2MO-5.02 (,
ESA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
City of Temecula Addendum to the
Santa Margarita Area Annexation
Paoe
1. Introduction ................................................................................. ............................... 1 -1
1.1 Purpose and Scope ............................................................. ............................... 1 -1
1.2 Previous Environmental Documentation .............................. ............................... 1 -3
1.3 Findings of this Addendum .................................................. ............................... 1-4
1.4 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR ............. ............................... 1 -5
1.5 Contact Person .................................................................... ............................... 1 -6
2. Project Description ..................................................................... ............................... 2 -1
2.1 Project Location ................................................................... ............................... 2 -1
2.2 Site Description .................................................................... ............................... 2 -1
' Figure 1: Proposed Modification of Boundary ..................... ............................... 2 -3
2.3 Project Description ............................................................... ............................... 2 -5
2.4 Project Objectives ................................................................ ............................... 2 -6
2.5 Environmental Setting .......................................................... ............................... 2 -6
2.6 Discretionary Actions and Approvals ................................. ............................... 2 -11
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
3.1 Prior Environmental Review and Discussion ....................... ............................... 3 -1
3.1.1 Air Quality ............................................................................ ............................... 3 -1
3.1.2 Biological Resources ........................................................... ............................... 3-4
3.1.3 Cultural Resources .............................................................. ............................... 3 -8
3.1.4 Land Use and Planning ....................................................... ............................... 3 -9
3.1.5 Mineral Resources ............................................................. ............................... 3 -12
3.1.6 Public Services and Utilities ............................................... ............................... 3 -13
3.1.7 Transportation and Traffic .................................................. ............................... 3 -17
3.1.8 Noise ................................................................................. ............................... 3 -18
3.1.9 Recreation .............................................. ............................... ........................... 3-22
4 . Findings .......................................................................................... ............................4 -1
t:
s;
5. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and
Abbreviations ......................................................................... ............................... 5 -1
i+
r:
1 yf
1
Y
Addendum to Ne City of Temeala Santa MBlgiellO Nae Anrexatlon i ESA /208485.02
EIR January 2010
i
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This document is an Addendum to the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report
(FEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2007041085) for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation and
related actions, certified by the City of Temecula (City) in December 2008. The certified EIR was
also utilized as the appropriate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documentation to
support the request for annexation submitted to the Riverside County Local Agency Formation
Commission ( LAFCO). LAFCO denied the annexation request at their June 4, 2009 pubic
hearing, adopting related resolutions on June 25, 2009. The City of Temecula is now proposing to
submit a revised annexation application to the Riverside County LAFCO to exclude
approximately 487 acres of the 4,997 acres previously proposed in the certified Santa Margarita
Area Annexation FEIR. The 487 acre not a part area of this amended annexation boundary
includes the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine project site and a few adjacent parcels
from the previously certified FEIR project. The amended annexation request would reduce the
residential development potential within the annexation area from 713 acres with a maximum of
81 new dwelling units and 263 estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO
application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to approximately 225 acres with a maximum of
22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated total residents. The remainder of the annexation area is
owned by public entities for the purpose of resource conservation and as such, does not have
development potential. The amended annexation request would result in an approximate 68%
reduction in impacts (acreage reduction of 68 %) to biological and cultural resources and an
approximate 73% reduction (dwelling unit reduction of 73 %) to impacts in all other areas as
compared to the previous annexation request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. The 68% reduction
in impacts to biological and cultural resources is a result of the reduced amount of land (acres)
that would have the potential to be developed (or impacted) as a result of the proposed amended
annexation area. The amended annexation area would include approximately 4,284; acres of open
space and conservation designated lands. This Addendum serves as the environmental review
document for the revised annexation request which now encompasses approximately 4,510
Acreage sums are rounded to the nearest whole acre and may vary by one (1) acre due to rounding to the nearest
whole acre.
2 22 new dwelling units would be the worst -case scenario based on one (1) dwelling unit per 10 acres and includes
reconstruction of 4 existing dwelling units within the 225 -acre residentially zoned portion of the reduced
annexation area.
' 3 Acreage sums are rounded to the nearest whole acre and may vary by one (1) acre due to rounding to the nearest
whole acre.
4 1bid.
Md"Um b qe Gy of Temewla Sams Marparib No Annexasm ESA 1208485.02
EIR Jenaaq 2010 k
C
i. Imrotluction
' acres), as required pursuant to provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA),
Public Resources Code Section 21000, et seq., and State and local CEQA Guidelines.
Under the original proposal, 713 acres within the Santa Margarita Annexation Area (SMAA)
designated Rural Mountainous (RM) (1 du/10 acres) under the County of Riverside land use
designation was to be changed to Hillside Residential (HR) (1 du /10 acres) under the City of
Temecula General Plan land use designation. As noted in the certified FEIR, a total of 718 acres
were to be designated as Hillside Residential (HR) under the City's General Plan land use
designation because a 5 -acre parcel with an existing residence was proposed to be included in the
HR designation, although it is currently within the County's Open Space - Conservation Habitat
(OS -CH) designation. This 5 -acre parcel was recently purchased by San Diego State University
(SDSU) and is now intended to be used in a manner consistent with the Open Space land use
designation and pre - zoning proposed for this property. The residence that currently exists on this
parcel would become a legal non - conforming use under the proposed OS -C -SM zone. Therefore,
the previously proposed land use designation was to include a total of 713 acres, not 718 acres
within the Hillside Residential (HR) (1 dull acres designation).
The retraining 4,284 acres within the Santa Margarita Annexation area is currently designated as
Open Space Conservation Habitat (OS -CH) under the County or Riverside's land use designation
and the proposed General Plan Amendment proposes to change the entire 4,284 acre portion of
' the project area currently designated as Open Space Conservation Habitat (OS -CH) under the
County of Riverside's General Plan land use designation, to the City of Temecula General Plan
land use designation of Open Space (OS). This will remain identical in the amended annexation
request. Please refer to the comparison below.
COMPARISON OF THE ADDENDUM TO THE SANTA MARGARITA ANNEXATION
TO THE ORIGINAL PROPOSED PROJECT
Santa Margarita Area Annexation
Component of
Development Certified FOR Addendum to the FEIR
Single-family 713 acres with 81 new dwelling units 225 acres with 22 new dwelling units
residential
Open Space & 4,284 acres 4,284 acres
Conservation
Estimated New 283 72
Residents°
a Subsequent purchase by SDSU of 5 -acre parcel acres is now intended to be used in a manner consistent with the Open Space land use
designation and pre - zoning proposed for this property. The residence that currently exists on this parcel would become a legal non-
conforming use under the proposed OS -C -SM zone. Therefore, the previously proposed land use designation was to include a total of
713 acres, not 718 acres within the Hillside Residential (HR) (1 dull acres designation).
to 225 acres Is the total allowable acreage for development of new dwelling units using the underlying General Plan land use del gnatlons.
At 1 dull acres. 22 units would result.
e It is noted that the city of Temecula uses a population generation rate of 3.24 Persons per single - family dwelling unit while the County of
Riverside General Plan utilizes a population generation rate of 3.01 persons per dwelling unit, The estimated number of new residents
reflects the higher estimated population calculation.
Addandgm to the Chyof Temews Sams Margarita Area Annmtatlon 1-2 ESA / 200405.02
EIR bnuery2010
1. IntrodmHon
Pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and State and local CEQA Guidelines, the City is the Lead j
Agency and is charged with the responsibility of deciding whether to approve the proposed
project. As part of the decision - snaking process, the City is required to review and consider the
potential environmental effects that could result from the modification of the annexation request
analyzed in the previously certified EIR. In addition, LAFCO will use this addendum as the
CEQA document for any action that they take on the revised annexation request.
Since certification of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR, the County of Riverside has
released and circulated the Liberty Quarry Draft EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2007061104)
which addresses impacts resulting from development of the proposed Liberty Quarry Mine to be
located within the 487 acre segment excluded from this amended annexation request. The Draft
EIR was available for a 60 -day public review and comment period from July 20, 2009 through
September 18, 2009 and extended an additional 60 days through November 23, 2009. The FEIR
has not been released and the project has not been scheduled for a public hearing at the Riverside
County Board of Supervisors.
1.2 Previous Environmental Documentation
In December 2008, the City of Temecula City Council certified the FEIR for the Santa Margarita
Area Annexation. For the purposes of this Addendum, the FEIR refers to all project documents,
including the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). The FEIR addressed potential impacts
associated with the Santa Margarita Area Annexation and associated discretionary and ministerial
actions. The originally approved FEIR involved the annexation of 4,997 acres into the City which
was to include a Sphere of Influence expansion for the city; an amendment to its General Plan
Land Use Map designating the land uses within the sphere of influence expansion areas; the pre -
zoning of the annexation area with zoning designation consistent with the land use designation;
and seeking approval for the annexation from LAFCO.
The originally approved FEIR included the following land use applications:
Planning Application PA07 -0225
Planning Application PA07 -0225 consisted of two components an amendment to the city of
Temecula General Plan (General Plan Amendment) and the pre- zoning of the subject
property (Change of Zone) described as follows:
• General Plan Amendment proposed to amend the General Plan's Land Use Map with
land use designations over the 4,443 acres of the subject property located outside of the
city of Temecula's current sphere of influence. The 477 acres currently designated RM
I DU /10 AC in Riverside County would become Hillside Residential (HR) 1 DU /10
AC in the city of Temecula, 3,961 acres of the 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the
County would be designated Open Space (OS) in the City and 5 acres currently
designated OS -CH in the County would become FIR 1 DU /10 AC in the city of
Temecula. The amendment would only become effective if the previous annexation
request had been approved by LAFCO.
Mawr to ere cay of Tanewa sanw Margarits Area Mrrema 1 -3 ESM205155.02
FIR Jawary2010
1. Intmduction
' • Change of Zone proposed the pre - zoning of approximately 4,997 acres with zoning
designations which would follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land
use designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation-Santa
Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and 718 acres designated with a zoning district of "Hillside
Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC. The
proposed pre- zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA through
the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal will
modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open space,
and mining to primarily residential and open space uses. The pre - zoning would only
become effective if the previous annexation had been approved by LAFCO.
Planning Application PA07 -0226
• Sphere of Influence Expansion proposed the expansion of the city of Temecula's
sphere of influence to include that 4,443 -acre portion of the 4,997 -acre SMAA outside
of the city's current sphere of influence, with ultimate approval by LAFCO.
• Annexation proposed the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,997
acres into the city of Temecula, with ultimate approval by LAFCO.
• LAFCO denied both the sphere amendment and annexation requests.
With the exception of mineral resources, air quality, transportation and traffic, and noise impacts,
' the FEIR identified that impacts from the entire project would be either less than significant or
mitigated to below a level of significance. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was
prepared and adopted.
1.3 Findings of this Addendum
Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, this Addendum has been prepared to
determine whether the project will result in a change in circumstances, new impacts, or new
information of substantial importance requiring the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental
EIR.
This examination includes an analysis of the provisions of Section 21166 of CEQA and Section
15164 of the CEQA Guidelines and their applicability to the proposed project. The focus of this
examination is whether the CEQA analysis conducted, as described in the previously certified
FEIR, adequately addresses the impacts associated with an annexation area that is reduced by 487
acres from the 4,997 acres (previously proposed in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation certified
FEIR) as part of this Addendum. As concluded in Chapter 3 of this document, the mitigation
measures established in the certified Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR would more than
adequately mitigate the impacts resulting from implementation of the reduced acreage project.
This Addendum reviews new information that was not known and could not have been known
with exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR was
certified.
MOenlum to the Oty of Tem pA Santa Margarita Area Mnaxati0n 1-4 ESA 1208485.02
EIR January 2010
1. IntrodOafion
1.4 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Section 15164(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be
prepared "if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred." Section -15162 of the
State CEQA Guidelines identifies the conditions that require preparation of a subsequent EIR. A
proposed change in a project will require preparation of a subsequent EIR if:
1. The change in the project is substantial.
Substantial changes in the project are those that would require major revision of the previous EIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects, or if a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects has occurred.
2. The circumstances under which the project is undertaken have substantially changed.
Substantial changes in circumstances are those defined as those that would require major
revisions of the previous EIR in order to describe and analyze new significant environmental
effects, or any changes that would cause a substantial increase in the severity of the previously
identified significant effects.
' 3. New information ofsubstantial importance, which was not known and could have not been
known, with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified,
.shows:
A. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR;
B. The significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
. identified in the previous EIR;
C. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be
feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but
the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or
D. Mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in
the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the
environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measures or
alternatives.
If none of the above conditions is met, as is the case with this amended project, the City may i
require preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) or an Addendum, or the City
may decide that no further environmental documentation is necessary. The City has elected to
proceed with this Addendum.
9
' This Addendum has evaluated each of the issues addressed in the FEIR, as well as each of the
issues contained in the discussion presented in Chapter 3 of this document. Based on this
Addendum to the City of Temewla Sama Margarita Area Anneotion 1 -5 E841208485.02
EIR January2010
1. Introdmton
analysis and the information contained herein, there is no evidence that the ro osed
P P
project requires major changes to the FEIR. Comparison of the previous project with the
reduced project, as described in Chapter 3 of this document, indicates that there are no new
significant environmental impacts associated with implementation of the proposed project and
mitigation, as described in the FEIR.
This Addendum relies on use of an Environmental Checklist Form, as suggested in
Section 15063 (d)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The Checklist Form is used:
• To evaluate whether there are any new or more severe significant environmental effects
associated with implementation of the proposed project and proposed amendments; and
• To review whether there is new information or circumstances that would require preparation
of additional environmental documentation in the form of a subsequent or supplemental EIR,
or if an Addendum is appropriate.
Chapter 3 of this document contains the discussion summarizing the responses to the questions on
the form covering required environmental issues.
1.5 Contact Person
' The Lead Agency for the Addendum for the proposed project is the City of Temecula. Any
questions about the preparation of this Addendum, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be
refereed to the following:
Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner
Community Development Department
City of Temecula
PO Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589
Telephone: 951- 693 -3959
Fax: 951 - 694 -6477
1 _
AtloNqum to Ne City of Temeada Santa Margarita Area Annexation 1 -6 ESAl20B485.02
EIR January 2010
CHAPTER 2
Project Description
2.1 Project Location
The amended SMAA project site is comprised of approximately 4,510 acres located in the
unincorporated portion of Riverside County, along the northern side of the San Diego - Riverside
County line and west of Interstate 15 (I -15) and southwest of the City (Figure 1). This area is
comprised of Riverside County's portion of the SMER and adjacent properties.
2.2 Site Description
The amended project site consists of approximately 4,510 acres of publicly and privately owned
primarily undeveloped land; most of which is undisturbed natural open space within the SMER.
The majority of the area is comprised of steep hills with scattered outcroppings of granite
' boulders, sloping in a southwesterly direction with elevations ranging from approximately
530 feet to 2,330 feet above mean sea level (msl). Within the lower reaches of the project area is
the Santa Margarita River which flows year round. From the river bottom up into the hills are
many seasonal drainages.
Within the entire 4,510 -acre project area there are only six occupied dwelling units with two
dwelling units occasionally used by the San Diego State University (SDSU) Field Station
Program to house researchers. The remaining privately -held properties, outside of the SMER, are
currently vacant. At various locations within the SMER are scientific monitoring stations related
to SDSU's research programs. The pristine nature of this area has made it a valuable resource for
ecological study.
The project area includes approximately 225 acres of private property within which only four lots
are developed with single - family homes. Two of the six homes within the project area are part of
the SMER and are only occupied by those individuals conducting research. The other four
occupied properties are primarily large ranch estates involved with agriculture or equestrian
activities.
The SMER is a key part of preserving the entire Santa Margarita River, one of the last free-
flowing rivers in coastal southern California, and its rich ecosystem. The Santa Margarita River I
officially begins northeast of the project site, at the confluence of Temecula Creek and Murrieta
Creek at the Temecula city limits. The River flows through the Temecula Gorge and ultimately
empties into the ocean through the largely undisturbed lands of Camp Pendleton. The upper
' watershed of the Santa Margarita River is thus the combined watersheds of Temecula and
r
ApEarMaro to Ora City N TOMWAa SaMa MarpaMa Area M cation 2 -1 ESA) 208485.02
EIR Jawary 2010
2. Project oesdnplion
Murieta Creeks (please refer to Figure 2-4 of the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area
Annexation FEIR certified December 9, 2008)].
Within the project area 4,284 acres have a Riverside County General Plan Land Use Designation
of "Open Space - Conservation Habitat' (OS -CH) while the remaining acres are designated "Rural
Mountainous" (RM). The OS -CH designation applies to public and private lands conserved and
managed in accordance with adopted Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) and
other conservation plans. The RM designation is for single - family residential uses with a
minimum lot size of 10 acres. Within this designation there is an allowance for limited animal
keeping, agriculture, recreational uses, compatible resource development (which may include the
commercial extraction of mineral resources with approval of a surface mining permit) and
associated uses and governmental uses. Currently, most of the project area is zoned "Rural
Residential' (R -R). The R -R zone allows a minimum lot size of 0.5 acres. A small area
comprised of 118 acres is currently zoned R -A -20 (Residential Agricultural with a 20 -acre
minimum lot size). The majority of the private properties currently have a Riverside County Land
Use designation of RM (please refer to Figure 2 -5 and Figure 2 -6 of the September 22, 2008
Santa Margarita Area Annexation EIR).
1 g
4
E
i
�!
Addendum to Na Cirycf Temecula Senb AlBrpedla Area AanBaeGM 2.2
EIR ESA/2M485.02 .02
January 2010
}' c
s
TI ' — ! 19
1 1 j 1
2. Pm)ect Description
This page left intentionally blank
li
Adderdum to the Chy of Te IaSSW MuWwAmaM= on 2-4 ESA I 2DBM.D2
ER AnmryMIO
2. Project Description
2.3 Project Description
The proposed project is the annexation of 4,510 acres into the City which will include a Sphere of
Influence expansion for the city; an amendment to its General Plan Land Use Map designating
the land uses within the sphere of influence expansion areas; the pre- zoning of the annexation
area with zoning designation consistent with the land use designation; and seeking approval for
the annexation from LAFCO.
The proposed SMAA includes the following land use applications:
Planning Application LR09 -0024
Planning Application LR09 -0024 consists of the following components described as
follows:
• General Plan Amendment proposing to amend the General Plan's Land Use Map
with land use designations over the 4,126 acres of the subject property located outside
of the city of Temecula's current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently
designated RM I DU /10 AC in Riverside County will become HR 1 DU /10 AC in the
city of Temecula, 3,966 acres designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS
in the city of Temecula.
• Change of Zone proposing the pre - zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning
designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use
designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa
Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district
of "Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10
AC. The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA
through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change
proposal will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include
residential, open space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses.
• Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the City of Temecula's
sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside
of the city's current sphere of influence, with ultimate approval by LAFCO.
• Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510
acres into the city of Temecula, with ultimate approval by LAFCO.
Pre - zoning applies to land that is adjacent to the current City boundaries, but is not yet part of the
City. The pre - zoning process provides a description of the activities the City would potentially
allow on subject property once it becomes part of the City. The approval and implementation of the
previously outlined planning applications by the City and LAFCO would result in the ability of the
underlying private landowners to potentially develop on a 225 acre area under the HR -SM zoning
designation, which is limited to 1 DU /10 AC and which will
g permit a maximum of 22 new dwelling
units to be built. The City's designation does allow a number of uses other than residential (i.e.
' churches, educational facilities, libraries, day care centers, bed and breakfast establishments). A
variety of open spacelconservation compatible land uses would also be allowed under these
A80en8um to ma city o(TemecWe Santa Margalu Area Annexa8m 2-5 ESA /20848&02 �-
EIR . ftary2010
w
2. Project Description
proposed general plan and zoning designations. A total of 22 single - family dwelling units is
considered a worst case scenario, as four dwelling units already exist and may never be
reconstructed and the actual development of the remaining dwelling units is heavily constrained by
numerous environmental and physical design constraints including: topography; domestic water
supply; wastewater disposal; dry utilities; primary and secondary access; land- locked parcels;
geotechnical considerations; on -site fire department water storage requirements (a minimum of
120,000 gallons per dwelling unit) and emergency access requirements; sensitive habitat and
species issues; and MSHCP conservation requirements. It should be noted that it is considered
highly likely that many residential parcels could not meet these development requirements on an
individual basis. The proposed hillside development standards would require specific setback,
massing, landscaping and fuel modification requirements, and would prohibit mass grading and
wholesale vegetation clearing for agricultural purposes. As such, individual dwelling units would
be constructed as custom homes and would be required to incorporate sensitive design
considerations into the planning of each site. It is not possible to forecast when all 22 units would
be constructed, as it is dependent on the intentions of each underlying landowner, market conditions
and the economic feasibility of complying with the above - outlined environmental, physical and
design constraints. A reasonable phasing assumption would entail development of 5 homes per
year, which would require approximately 5 years to construct all 22 single - family dwelling units
allowed under the proposed planning applications. hi order to implement a worst case scenario to
be analyzed in this document, it will be assumed that all 22 single- family units will be developed by
2015, and all impact analyses in this document will be based on the residential units being
constructed by this year.
2.4 Project Objectives
A clear statement of project objectives allows for the analysis of reasonable alternatives to the
proposed project. A range of reasonable alternatives, both on- and off -site, that would feasibly
attain most of the basic project objectives, while avoiding or substantially lessening the
significant effects of the project, must be analyzed per CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6. The
City has identified the following planning objectives for the SMAA:
• To integrate the SMAA area into the City's General Plan, adopting general plan and zoning
amendments that establish the general framework for ultimate development within the study
area.
• To preserve public lands within the SMAA area in natural open space; while retaining the
existing rural residentiallagricultural character of privately -owned lands.
• To protect the research value of the SMER by prohibiting incompatible land uses within
adjacent properties.
2.5 Environmental Setting
Geology and Soils
' The project site is located at the southern end of the Temescal Valley located in western Riverside
County. The Temescal Valley can generally be described as ranging from the Riverside
AddeMm M the GIY of Temewie Santa Margarita Area Ameratim 2-6 ESA /20848&02 t
EIR Januag2D10 #:
2. Project Description
' County /Orange County line east to the Perris Valley and from the city of Corona south to the
Riverside County /San Diego County line. The northern portion of the Temescal Valley including
the Lake Elsinore area, generally drains north into the Santa Ana River; while the southern
portion of'remescal Valley generally drains south into the Santa Margarita River by way of
Temecula Creek and Murrieta Creek.
The Temescal Valley area is located in the northern part of the Peninsular Range province and is
dominated by rocks of the southern California batholith. The multiple intrusives of the batholith
have invaded older metasedimentary and metavolcanic rocks of Paleozoic through early
Cretaceous ages (570 to 98 million years ago). Bodies of these metasedimentary and
metavolcanic rocks now crop out along the edges of the batholithic rocks and as roof pendants
within batholithic rocks. Rocks of Late Cretaceous through Holocene age (98 million years ago to
the present) were deposited over the eroded surfaces of these older rocks and crop out in the
major drainages. These younger rocks are mostly conglomerates, claystoncs, and sandstones of
marine and continental origin.
Typical rock types that can be found in this area include:
• Pre- Batholithic Rocks: Jurupa Complex (gneiss, schist, quartzite and marble), Bedford
Canyon Formation (quartzites, slates, and argillites), Santiago Peak Volcanics (pyrite and
pyrrhotite), Terescal Wash Quartz Latite Porphyry (porphyritic quartz latite).
' • Southern California Batholith Rocks: Gabbro, quartz diorite, granodiorite, and granite. ;
(Silica, feldspar, lithium minerals, micas and gemstones.) 3
• Post- Batholithic Rocks: Cretaceous Formations (sandstone, cobble and small boulder
conglomerate, siltstone and shale), Silverado Formation (marine clays, silts, quartz and
arkosic sands), Vaqueros and Sespe Formations (sandstone and conglomerate).
The City is located in one of the most seismically active areas of southern California. The city is
traversed by the Elsinore fault and has historically experienced earthquakes of moderate
magnitude. The Elsinore fault zone, which is located in proximity to the eastern boundary of the
SMAA, is one of the largest in southern California and in historical times, has been one of the
quietest. The southeastern extension of the Elsinore fault zone, the Laguna Salads fault, ruptured
in 1892 in a magnitude 7.0 earthquake, but the main trace of the Elsinore fault zone has only seen
one historical event greater than magnitude 5.2: the magnitude 6.0 earthquake of 1910 near
Temescal Valley, which produced no known surface rupture and did little damage. Other faults
surrounding the City include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport - Inglewood,
Sierra Madre -Santa Susana- Cucamonga, Rose Canyon, Coronado Banks, San Diego Trough, and
San Clemente Island faults. p
1!
The eastern portion of the annexation area is part of Cieneba -Rock land- Fallbrook association
that is characterized by well - drained and somewhat excessively drained soils. Typically, these
soils are very shallow to moderately deep soils in undulating to steep areas and have a surface
layer of sandy loam and fine sandy loam on a granitic rock base. The western portion of the
' annexation area is identified as being within the Cajalco- Temescal -Las Posas association which is
characterized as well - drained soils in undulating to steep areas. These soils are moderately deep
Addenaanlo0le Cftyof Te la sam MwPrft veaA O*1bn 2 -7 ESA /205x55.02 t'
EIR J Wry2010
2. Project Deudplbn '..
to shallow soils that have a surface layer of fine sandy loam and loam found on gabbro and latite-
porphyry. According to the soil survey information from the Natural Resources Conservation
Service, the primary soil types within the project boundary are Cajalco rocky fine sandy loam,
15 to 50 percent slopes, eroded (CbF2), Cieneba rocky sandy loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes,
eroded (CkF2), Fallbrook rocky sandy loam, shallow, 15 to 50 percent slopes, eroded (FcF2), Las
Posas rocky loam, 15 to 50 percent slopes, severely eroded (LkF3) and Rockland (RtF). A
number of other soil types are found within the project boundary in small quantities throughout
the site.
Air Quality
The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is under the
jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District ( SCAQMD). The SCAB
consists of Orange County, the coastal and mountain portions of Los Angeles County, as well as
Riverside and San Bernardino counties. Regional and local air quality within the SCAB is
affected by topography, atmospheric inversions, and dominant onshore flows. Topographic
features such as the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains form natural
horizontal barriers to the dispersion of air contaminants. The presence of atmospheric inversions
limits the vertical dispersion of air pollutants. With an inversion, the temperature initially follows
a normal pattern of decreasing temperature with increasing altitude, however, at some elevation,
' the trend reverses and temperature begins to increase as altitude increases. This transition to
increasing temperature establishes the effective mixing height of the atmosphere and acts as a
barrier to vertical dispersion of pollutants. p
Dominant onshore flow provides the driving mechanism for both air pollution transport and (€
pollutant dispersion. Air pollution generated in coastal areas is transported east to inland receptors
by the onshore flow during the daytime until a natural barrier (the mountains) is confronted,
limiting the horizontal dispersion of pollutants. The result is a gradual degradation of air quality
from coastal areas to inland areas, which is most evident with the photochemical pollutants such
as ozone formed under reactions with sunlight.
The project site is located within SCAQMD Source Receptor Area (SRA) 25. The most recent
published data applicable to SRA 25 indicates that the baseline air quality conditions in the
project area include occasional events of very unhealthful air. However, the frequency of smog
alerts has dropped significantly in the last decade. Ozone (0 particulates are the two most
significant air quality concerns in the project area. The yearly monitoring records document that
prior to 1997, approximately one -third or more of the days each year experienced a violation of t
the state homy ozone standard, with around ten days annually reaching first stage alert levels of
0.20 parts per million (ppm) for one hour. It is encouraging to note that ozone levels have
dropped significantly in the last few years with less than one -fifth of the days each year
experiencing a violation of the state hourly ozone standard since 1997. Locally, no second stage
alert (0.35 ppm/hour) has been called by SCAQMD in the last ten years.
' The California Air Resources Board (CARB) maintains records as to the attainment status of air
basins throughout the state, under both state and federal criteria. The portion of the SCAB within
Ad"M to the City of TemeWa Santo Margarita Ana Amexatbn 2-8 ESA /208185.02
EIR J .y 2010
2. Pmiect Daec,iptlon
' which the proposed project is located is designated as a non - attainment area for ozone, particulate
matter less than 10 microns (PM -10), and Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns (PM -2.5) under
both state and federal standards.
Detailed discussions of the air quality setting and air pollution related to the project site are
included in Section 3.1 (Air Quality) of this document.
Biological Resources
The City is located within the western Riverside County MSHCP` area. The overall biological
goal of the MSIICP is to maintain and restore biological diversity and natural ecosystem
processes that support diversity in natural areas within westem Riverside County known to
support threatened, endangered or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. The
MSHCP identifies five geographic locations within the City and surrounding areas that contain
potential regional wildlife corridor linkages, including French Valley, Lower Tucalota Creek,
Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and Murrieta Creek. Additionally, the Santa Ana Palomar
Mountains Linkage straddles the San Diego County Northern MSHCP and the Riverside County
Western MSHCP. This jurisdictional division placed an artificial boundary directly through the
Linkage.
The SMAA project site consists of approximately 4,510 acres of primarily undeveloped land and
' a 5 -mile stretch of the protected Santa Margarita River. The majority of the project area is
undisturbed and is in a pristine natural area, of which 4,284 acres have been conserved in the [
SMER within the project boundary.
F
The SMER adjoins a "Special Linkage Area" of the Riverside County MSHCP. The SMER lies
in the chaparral /coastal sage and scrub /oak woodland vegetation zone of southern California. The
climate is Mediterranean, with cool wet winters and warn summers moderated by the marine
influence of the Pacific Ocean that lies 18 miles (30 kilometers (km)) to the west. Mean annual
precipitation is approximately 400 mm and the mean annual temperature about 16.4'C. The
topography is complex consisting of low hills and intervening drainages. The majority of the area
is comprised of steep hills with scattered outcroppings of granite boulders sloping in a
southwesterly direction with elevations ranging from approximately 530 feet to 2,330 feet above
msl. The northern portion of the reserve is dominated by the deep gorge of the Santa Margarita
River.
Most of the project site is covered by low shrub vegetation, a mosaic of mixed chaparral, chamise
chaparral, and coastal sage, oak and riparian woodlands are found in the deeper drainages.
Sycamore, cottonwood, and willow forests are part of a protected riparian corridor in the SMER.
Coast live oak occurs along ephemeral drainages. The upland areas of the reserve support coastal
sage scrub and southern mixed chaparral. Some native grassland occurs in small isolated patches.
Scattered self - seeded orange, avocado and eucalyptus groves are also found throughout the
project area.
PACenuot to the Qty N Temeala Sanb MargadV Prey Anr aam 2 -9 ESA /208485.07
EIR Januag2oto *i
g
S�
2. Protect Description
The SDSU Field Station Program for the SMER has conducted significant research of natural
communities found within the reserve. The research has documented the observation of
181 animal species within the SMER. Additionally, the California Department of Fish and Game
Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) and SMER records identify 20 sensitive species as
occurring within or in proximity to the annexation area. Two of these species, least Bell's vireo
(Vireo bellii pusillus) and California gnatcatcher (Polioptila calt(ornica californica) are federally
and/or state listed endangered species. Other sensitive wildlife species documented within the
SMER include: two - striped garter snake (Thamnophis hammondii), northern red diamond
rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber ruber), Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Sharp- shinned Hawk
(Accipiterstriaues), Bell's Sage Sparrow (Amphirpiza belli belli), Golden Eagle (Aquila
chryraetos), White - tailed Kite (Elanus leucurus), Loggerhead Shrike (Lanus ludovicianus),
Orange- throated Whiptail (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus), western spadefoot toad (Spea
hammondii), southwestern pond turtle (Actinemys marmorala pallida), and Arroyo chub (Gila
orcuttii).
The research has documented the observation of 331 plant species. Three sensitive plant species,
the San Diego thorn mint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia), rainbow manzanita (Arctostaphylos
rainbowensis) and Parry's tetracoccus (Tetracoccus dioicus). A CNPS species 1B.2 plant has
been documented on the project site during SDSU surveys. San Diego thorn mint is a federally
listed threatened and California listed endangered species. Rainbow manzanita is a California
' Native Plant Society (CNPS) list 1B.1 species.
Mineral Resources
i
Riverside County has diverse mineral resources, including extensive deposits of clay, limestone,
iron, sand, and aggregates that have been influential in the development of the area and serve as
an important component of the County's economy. Riverside County consists predominantly of
igneous and metamorphic rock with some sedimentary units. They vary from hard rock
underlying steep slopes of the San Jacinto Mountains to the weathered granitic rocks of Joshua
Tree National Park and hillsides near the city of Riverside. Alluvial (river) valleys between these
mountain ranges contain sediments with significant variation in thickness. Some valleys are filled
with a few hundred feet of Pleistocene and Holocene sediments, whereas others, such as the
Coachella, San Jacinto and Elsinore Valleys, contain several thousand feet to several miles of
sediment. The thickest sediments have been deposited in basins that are being pulled apart by the
movement of tectonic plates. In the Temescal Valley, where the SMER area is located typical
rock types that can be found include:
• Pre - Batholithic Rocks: Jurupa Complex (gneiss, schist, quartzite and marble), Bedford
Canyon Formation (quartzites, slates, and az illites Santiago Peak Volcanics
Y (q , g ), g (pyrite and
pyrrhotite), Temescal Wash Quartz Latite Porphyry (porphyritic quartz latite).
• Southern California Batholith Rocks: Gabbro, quartz diorite, granodiorite, and granite.
(Silica, feldspar, lithium minerals, micas and gemstones).
• Post - Batholithic Rocks: Cretaceous Formations (sandstone, cobble and small boulder
' conglomerate, siltstone and shale), Silverado Formation (marine clays, silts, quartz and
arkosic sands), Vaqueros and Sespe Formations (sandstone and conglomerate).
Meenaum to ma Gty of Tamecvla Santa Margarita fives MneadiDn 2 -10 EW 20808502 s
EIR January 2010
2. Project Description
' The site specifically has rock types that include primarily Cretaceous igneous granitic rocks,
Jurassic marine sedimentary rocks and Mesozoic basic intrusive rocks. Cretaceous -age granitic
bedrock is exposed throughout the area. The bedrock is comprised primarily of quartz and
feldspar.
The County of Riverside General Plan shows that the SMER area is located within an MRZ -3
zone; indicating that available geologic information indicates that mineral resources are likely to
exist, but the significance of the deposit is undetermined. The County General Plan, however,
recognizes that further exploration work could result in the reclassification of all or part of these
areas into the specific localities into MRZ -2 category. The designation for the Liberty Quarry
site changed from MRZ -3 to MRZ -2, which is located outside of the currently proposed
annexation area. Specifically, the area of the Liberty Quarry site is located within the original
boundary (area of land within the red line), but outside of the proposed modified boundary (area
of land without the blue cross - hatching) on Figure 1.
For the purposes of this addendum, the impact analysis will focus on the proposed project which
is the proposed 4,510 -acre SMAA project which includes: (1) General Plan Amendment to adopt
land use designations for 4,126 acres (OS and HR, I DU /10 AC) located outside of the City's
current sphere of influence; (2) adoption of pre- zoning to implement the General Plan land use
designations and hillside development standards, which will be conditioned on LAFCO approval
' of the annexation; (3) resolutions of application to LAFCO for an expansion of the City's sphere
of influence to include the portion of the annexation area not already in the City sphere of
influence and for annexation of the project area to the City; and (4) LAFCO consideration of the
proposed sphere expansion and annexation.
2.6 Discretionary Actions and Approvals
The certified FEIR and this addendum serve as informational documents for use by public
agencies, the general public, and decision makers. The certified FOR and this addendum discuss
the impacts of development pursuant to the proposed project and related components and analyze
project alternatives. The certified FEIR and this addendum will be used by the City and
responsible agencies in assessing impacts of the proposed project.
The following public officials and agencies will use the certified FEIR and this addendum when
considering the following actions:
City of Temecula Planning Commission
1. Recommendation to the Temecula City Council for approval of this addendum to the certified e
Final Environmental Impact Report EA -128.
r
2. Recommendation to the Temecula City Council regarding approval of Planning Application
LR09 -0024 consisting of:
I The MRZ -2 designation means that adequate information indicates that significant mineral deposits are present or
there is a high likelihood for their presence and development should be controlled.
AOGen to are City of Twmla sent. Maiparita Area Aral. 2 -11 ESAl2084&5.o2
EIR January 2oto
2. Project Description
' • Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the city of Temecula's
sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of
the city's current sphere of influence.
• Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510
acres into the city of Temecula
• General Plan Amendment proposing to update the General Plan's Land Use Map with
land use designations over 4,126 acres of the SMAA is located outside of the city's
current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently designated RM (1 DU /10 AC) in
Riverside County will become HR (1 DU /10 AC) in the city of Temecula, 3,966 acres
designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS in the city of Temecula.
• Change of Zone proposing the pre - zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning
designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use
designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa
Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district of
"Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC.
The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA
through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal
will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open
space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses.
's
' City of Temecula City Council
r
L Approval of this addendum to the certified Final Environmental impact Report EA -128.
2. Approval of Planning Application LR09 -0024 consisting of: S
4 Sphere of Influence Expansion proposing the expansion of the city of Temecula's g
sphere of influence to include that 4,126 -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of #
the City's current sphere of influence. #$
• Annexation proposing the annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510
acres into the city of Temecula.
e General Plan Amendment proposing to update the General Plan's Land Use Map with
land use designations over the 4,126 acres of the SMAA is located outside of the City's
current sphere of influence. The 159 acres currently designated RM (1 DU /10 AC) in
Riverside County will become HR (1 DU /10 AC) in the city of Temecula, 3,966 acres
designated OS -CH in the County will be designated OS in the city of Temecula.
• Change of Zane proposing the pre- zoning of approximately 4,510 acres with zoning
designations which follow the same boundaries used for the general plan land use
designations including 4,284 acres with a zoning district of "Conservation -Santa
Margarita" (OS- C -SM); and approximately 225 acres designated with a zoning district of
"Hillside Residential -Santa Margarita" (HR -SM), allowing development of 1 DU /10 AC.
The proposed pre - zoning will establish two new zones specifically for the SMAA
through the adoption of the Hillside Development Standards. This zone change proposal
' will modify the existing range of permitted uses, which now include residential, open
space, and mining to primarily residential and open space uses.
Addendum to the Cit"f Tame W Santa Marianna Area Annera4on 2-12 ESA /208485.02
EIR January 2010,,
2. PmiKt Descdpgon
1
Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission
1. Approval of Sphere of Influence Expansion expanding the city of Temecula's sphere of
influence to include that 4, l2G -acre portion of the 4,510 -acre SMAA outside of the City's
current sphere of influence.
2. Approval of Annexation of the SMAA consisting of approximately 4,510 acres into the city
of Temecula.
1 €€
I
r
E
1
is
Addandumw he City of Temaula Santa MwgWaNaa A Lion 2 -13 ESA /208488.02
EIR Am8ry 2010
CHAPTER 3
Environmental Impacts and
Mitigation Measures
3.1 Prior Environmental Review and Discussion
The certified FEIR for the Santa Margarita Area Annexation evaluated nine environmental
factors, including air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, land use and planning,
mineral resources, public services and utilities, transportation and traffic, noise and recreation.
The FEIR also established mitigation measures to reduce the level of significant impacts. A
mitigation monitoring program was adopted by the City in connection with certification of the
Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. As previously described, a Statement of Overriding
Considerations was adopted with certification of the 2008 FEIR.
f
' To ensure consistency between this EIR Addendum, the 2008 FEIR, the same environmental
topics will be evaluated. This section describes the existing setting and potential environmental
impacts resulting with the proposed project, which is the amended annexation request. There has
been no change in the existing setting since the time when the FEIR was prepared and certified
last year. This discussion will be followed by evaluation of potential environmental impacts
resulting with the proposed project. The analyses will focus on those environmental impacts that
are specific to the currently proposed amended annexation request.
3. 1.1 Air Quality
Existing Conditions
The existing air quality setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions
contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Air quality impacts resulting from implementation of the
originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.1 of the 2008 certified FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
As previously described, the Applicant is now proposing to submit a revised annexation
application to the Riverside Comity LAFCO that would remove approximately 487 acres of the
4,997 acres previously proposed in the September 22, 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation
FEIR (certified December 9, 2008). The 487 acres not part of this amended project would include
the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine site and a few adjacent parcels from the previously
certified FEIR project. In essence, the amended annexation request would reduce the component
of potential development from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263
Addendum to the City of Temecula Santa ih gwrita AreaAmexation 3 -1 ESA /206485.02
EIR January2010
I;
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the
certified FEIR, to approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72
estimated new residents. The amended annexation request would result in a predominantly 73%
(81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units
less) reduction in impacts as compared to the previous project evaluated by the certified FEIR. As
such, implementation of the amended annexation request would result in the following impacts to i
air quality:
ESTIMATED DAILY CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Construction Year ROG NO, CO so, PM -10 PM -2.5 CO2
2010 13 92 46 >1 14 6 9,950
2011 12 85 45 >1 13 6 9,950
2012 12 79 44 >1 13 6 9
2013 11 74 43 >1 13 5 9,950
2014 11 60 37 >1 12 4 9,053
SCAQMD Daily Regional 75 100 550 150 150 55 NA
Construction Thresholds
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA t
Original Project 2
Construction Year 2010 9 92 47 >1 14 6 9,950
Original Project .'
Construction year 2010 16 0 1 0 0 0 0
Minus Current Protect
Construction Year 2010
NOTE: See Appendix A of the Air Quality Impact Analysis ( Appendix 9) for model output repod. NA is not available.
SOURCE: ESA 2010 y
f
Evaluation of the above table indicates that daily worst -case emissions from construction of 22
dwelling units would not result in all exceedance of the SCAQMD regional air quality emissions'
threshold due to construction activities, therefore the impact from emissions produced during
project construction would be less than significant. However to further reduce construction
emissions the following mitigation measure 3.1 -2a as detailed in the certified FEIR, would apply
to the amended annexation request.
n
Addendum to the City of Temewla Santa Margarita Area Annexation 3.2 ESAl208485.02
EIR January 2010 I
P
5
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT OPERATION EMISSIONS (summer)
Peak Daily Emissions (lb/day) j
ActivitylYear ROG NO, CO SO PM-10 PM -2.5 CO2
SCAQMD Daily
Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 NA
Area source 1 <1 1 0 0 0 459
operational 2 2 21 >1 4 1 2,204
Total 3 2 22 >1 4 1 2,663
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA
Original Project Total 11 10 81 >1 14 3 9,804
Original Project Total
Minus current Project 8 8 59 0 10 2 7141
Total
SOURCE: ESA, 2010
ESTIMATED DAILY PROJECT OPERATION EMISSIONS (winter)
' Peak Dally Emissions (lb/day)
Activity/Year ROG NO c0 SOr PM -10 PM -2.5 CO2
SCAQMD Daily 55 55 550 150 150 55 NA
Thresholds
Area source 5 1 10 >1 1 1 876
operational 2 3 20 >1 4 1 1,997
Total 7 4 30 >1 5 2 2,873
Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No NA
Original Project Total 24 12 109 >1 19 8 10,577
Original Project Total
Minus current Project 17 8 79 0 14 6 7,704
Tot
SOURCE: ESA, 2010
No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected, and impacts would be lower
than those studied in the Final EIR. Further evaluation is not necessary.
C
Mitigation Measures `
Mifigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is
required.
1
i
MdeMum to the Car of TemeaM Santa MarWaa Nee Mnexatw 3 -3 ESA/ 209485.02
EIR ,lanuary 2010
3. Environmental Impacts antl Mitigation Measures
' Level of Significance after Mitigation
A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that
remained significant and unavoidable for air quality impacts. No other significant impacts are
anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa
Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation measures would lessen the
project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request or reduce
them to less than significant levels.
3.1.2 Biological Resources
Existing Conditions
i
The existing biological resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those
discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Biological resource impacts resulting from
implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.2 of
the 2008 certified FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
Future development of approximately 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and
72 estimated new residents would have the potential to result in impacts to sensitive wildlife
species found within the area. The potential impacts to biological resources associated with the
amended annexation request would result in a 68% reduction in the area where impacts might
occur as compared to the previously proposed annexation request, resulting in a substantially
reduced potential for habitat impact. Potential impacts to these species would include an
incremental loss of habitat (including breeding and/or seasonal foraging habitat). Individuals
present within zones of project grading and other direct development impacts could potentially be
killed or displaced by construction activities.
The amended annexation request project site ties within the MSHCP. Because the sensitive plant
and animal species located in the annexation area are MSHCP Covered Species the USFWS has
determined that these species are adequately conserved through implementation of the MSHCP.
(Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit No. TE088609 -0 dated June 22, 2004.) Therefore,
implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2 -1a as described in the certified FEIR would reduce
these potential impacts to a less than significant level.
Some of the bird species that have been documented on site are protected under the federal
MBTA and California Fish and Game Code which prohibits take, possession, or destruction of
birds, their nests or eggs (in particular raptor species). In order to avoid violation of the MBTA or
the California Fish and Game Code, general guidelines suggest that project- related disturbances
at active nesting territories be reduced or eliminated during the nesting cycle (generally February
1 to August 31). Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.2 -1b will reduce these potential
impacts to a less than significant level as described in the certified FEIR would reduce these
' potential impacts to a less than significant level.
MOm = to the elry of Temecula Santa WTarilii aes Amaatloo 3 -4 ESAl2(IM55M !:
EIR January 2010
3. Environmental Impacts and Miligatlon Measures
' The majority of the project area proposed for annexation will be designated "Open Space" and
will remain undeveloped. The development potential on the remaining 225 acres which will be
designated "Hillside Residential" is limited to I DU /10 AC which will permit a maximum of 22
new dwelling units to be built. As this development occurs, the loss of the portions of the project
site as habitat will be an adverse, but not substantial impact on region -wide populations of these
species. The amended annexation request's potential direct and indirect adverse impacts on any
species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species would be reduced to below
the level of significance through compliance with the provisions of the MSHCP and the
implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.2 -1a and 3.2-lb as described in the certified FEIR.
The vast majority of the riparian habitat within the annexation area occurs on the SMER, and is
therefore conserved. Therefore the amended annexation project would not result in a substantial
adverse impact to riparian habitats. The city of Temecula General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures
that apply to potential future activities within the project site are incorporated by reference in
Section 3.2 -6 of the certified FEIR. Development within the 225 -acre developable portion of the
amended annexation area would add to the overall loss of CSS caused by development within
wester Riverside County. Compliance with the MSHCP will mitigate these impacts to less than
significant. Therefore, impacts to any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the CDFG or by the USFWS
would be less than significant.
' The MSHCP identifies five geographic locations within the city and surrounding areas that
contain potential regional wildlife corridor linkages, including French Valley, Lower Tucalota
Creek, Temecula Creek, Pechanga Creek, and Murrieta Creek. Upon annexation, Santa Margarita
River would then also be a potential regional wildlife corridor linkage within the city in addition
to the previously identified five potential wildlife corridors. The amended annexation request
would remove a substantial portion of the southeast comer of the project site which was
previously (under the certified FEIR) located within a designated "Special Linkage Area."
r
Development within the now remaining developable area has the potential to impact wildlife
corridors. The precise location of grading and dwelling units and driveways is speculative and
therefore, the extent of the impact upon wildlife corridors cannot be determined. However,
compliance with the MSHCP and the conditions of the Temecula General Plan Mitigation
Measures outlined in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR and relevant provisions of the proposed
pre - zoning would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels.
Although most of the amended annexation request project site is located outside of criteria areas,
the amended project would still be located in proximity to three subunits: Subunit 1 ( Murrieta
Creek) to the north, Subunit 2 (Temecula and Pechanga Creeks) to the east and Subunit 6 (Santa
Rosa Plateau) also to the north. The project site is primarily located outside of identified criteria
areas. A small portion of the project site is located within Criteria Cell 7512 along the project's
northern boundary. Because this area is already conserved as part of the SMER it is unlikely that
development will occur in this portion of the criteria cell. The majority of the future projects
' within the project area would need to conform with the MSHCP requirements for non- criteria cell
areas. Inn accordance with the MSHCP, proposed projects outside of the criteria area are to be
Addendum to ero City of Temecula Santa Margariokea AAn tlon 3.5 ESA/20ad85.02
EIR
Ja .WY2010 �.
i'
3. Emironmental Impads and Mitigation Measures
' reviewed for consistency with the MSHCP Section 6.1.2 ( "Protection of Species Associated with
Riparian/Riverine Areas and Venial Pool" guidelines), the Section 6.1.3 ( "Protection of Narrow
Endemic Plant Species" guidelines), Section 6.1.4 ( "Guidelines Pertaining to the
Urban/Wildlands Interface ") and the Section 6.3.2 ( "Additional Survey Needs and Procedures. ").
The project site includes the Santa Margarita River and drainages tributary to the river. Although I
most of the sensitive riparian /riverine portion of the annexation area is preserved as part of the
SMER, approximately 225 acres of the proposed SMAA will retain the potential for development
in accordance with general plan and zoning designations, which will allow development of
approximately 22 new dwelling units. Future development within this area has the potential to
impact riparian/riverine resources. However, potential impacts resulting from any future
development of discretionary projects within the project area can be reduced to below the level of
significance through compliance with the MSHCP and the Temecula General Plan EIR conditions
listed in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR. Additionally, through compliance with the
mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the listed mitigation measures, it can be determined that
the amended annexation request project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.2.
The amended project site is not located within the Narrow Fndetnic Plant survey areas as shown t
on Figure 6 -1 of the MSHCP [please refer to Figure 3.2 -5 of the September 22, 2008 Santa
Margarita Area Annexation FFIR certified December 9, 2008)]. Although most of the annexation
area is preserved as part of the SMER, approximately 225 acres of the proposed SMAA project
' will retain the potential for development in accordance with general plan and zoning designations,
which will allow development of approximately 22 new dwelling units. Development within this
area has the potential to impact narrow endemic plant species at such time that development
occurs. The precise location and extent of impact cannot be determined at this time. Additionally,
the future location of narrow endemic plants cannot be determined at this time. Potential impacts
resulting from any future development of discretionary projects within the project area can be
reduced to below the level of significance through implementation of the listed mitigation r
measures.
Through compliance with the mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the listed mitigation
measures of the certified FEIR, potential impacts are reduced to below the level of significance
and the project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.3.
Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP sets forth guidelines which are intended to address indirect effects
associated with locating development in proximity to the MSHCP Conservation Area, where
applicable. The guidelines referenced above have been incorporated by reference through General
Plan EiR Mitigation Measure B -10 in Section 3.2.6 of the certified FEIR.
The SMAA project site is primarily located outside of identified criteria areas. A small portion of
the amended annexation request project site is located within Criteria Cell 7512 along the
project's northern boundary; however, in comparison to the original project, the amended project
site is not located within a designated "Special Linkage Area." The majority of the project site is
located outside of designated criteria areas. The project site is located in proximity to three
subunits: Subunit I (Murrieta Creek) to the north, Subunit 2 (Temecula and Pechanga Creeks) to
Addendum b the CNyd Tem w Ste Narww Anw Amera8 3— 6 ESA 1208485.02 t
EIR Janaary2010
l5.
k?
{i{;
3. Emimnmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' the east and Subunit 6 (Santa Rosa Plateau) also to the north. Due to the project site's partial
inclusion within an identified criteria cell, future development in the project area may need to
comply with the policies set forth in Section 6.1.4.
Although most of the annexation area is preserved as part of the SMER, approximately 225 acres
of the proposed SMAA will retain the potential for development in accordance with general plan
and zoning designations, which would allow development of approximately 22 new dwelling
units. Development within this area has the potential to require compliance with the "Guidelines
Pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface" as described in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP, at such
time that development requiring discretionary approval is proposed. Local policies and zoning
include regulations to buffer the SMER from adverse effects of development, avoid interference
with linkages for the species in the area, and preserve habitat for the common and sensitive
species in the area. Through compliance with the mandatory provisions of the MSHCP and the
listed mitigation measures, potential impacts are reduced to below the level of significance and
the project is consistent with MSHCP Section 6.1.4.
The amended annexation request project site is located outside of any Critical Area Species
Survey Area ( CASSA) for plants and mammals, although one CASSA plant species, the thread -
leaved brodiaea ( Brodiaea ftlifolia) has been observed within the project boundaries. The
southeast portion of the project site under the certified FEIR was located within the area shown
' on MSHCP Figure 6 -4 (Burrowing Owl Survey). This area is no longer included as part of the
amended annexation request; as such, the potential for impacts to burrowing owl habitat would be
greatly decreased.
The precise location of development and whether or not a development site contains occupied
burrowing owl habitat cannot be determined at this time. Additionally, due to the migratory
nature of the burrowing owl, there is a possibility that although burrowing owls may not be
located on a particular property at any point in time, they could occupy the site prior to actual
project construction. Development of future discretionary development proposals within this area
may require compliance with MSHCP Section 6.3.2 through the preparation of burrowing owl
habitat assessments and focused burrowing owl surveys, and compliance with the listed
mitigation measures for projects that occur on the portions of the projects site where burrowing
owl assessments are required.
The amended annexation request would still have the potential to have a significant impact
associated with burrowing owl habitat. However with the implementation of Mitigation Measure
3.2 -5a and Mitigation Measure 3.2 -5b (from the certified FEIR) the project impacts would be
below a level of significance. Based upon the above analysis of consistency with the MSHCP,
and implementation of the listed mitigation measures, the proposed project is consistent with the
provisions of the adopted MSHCP. For these reasons the proposed project will not conflict with
the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or state conservation
plan.
No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not
' necessary.
Addendum to the City of Temaala Sanla Margarita Area AmexaBOn 3 -7 ESA /108485.02
EIR January2010
3. Eovlronmental Imwcla onl Miliolon Measures
' Mitigation Measures
I
Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FFIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No new mitigation is required.
Level of Significance after Mitigation
No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified
in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation
measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed
amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels.
3.1.3 Cultural Resources
Existing Conditions
The existing cultural resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions
contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Cultural resource impacts resulting from implementation of
the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.3 of the 2008 certified
FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
' Impacts to cultural resources caused by the amended project were identified and recommended
mitigation measures as identified in the certified FEIR were developed to avoid or minimize
identified impacts to cultural resources. Please refer to the certified FEIR for a summary of
cultural resource impacts and mitigation measures. Any future development within the project
area could result in the adverse impact to cultural resouroes- Implementation of Mitigation
Measures as detailed in the certified FEIR (Section 3.3) would minimize this impact to a less than
significant level.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is
required.
Level of Significance after Mitigation
No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified
in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation
i
measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed
amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels.
A ftm N IM GN d Temeala Santa Margarita kea AmwUw 3-8 ESA 20a485.02
EIR Jamlary2g10 {`
3. Envlronmernal Impacts and Mitigation Measures
3.1.4 Land Use and Planning
Existing Conditions
The existing land use and planning setting and environment remain unchanged from those
discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Land Use and Planning impacts resulting from
implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.4 of
the 2008 certified FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
The amended SMAA is relatively consistent with the land use designations and policies of the
Riverside County General Plan and the Southwest Area Plan. Although the amended project
proposes to change the existing County land use designations of the project site from OS -HC and
RM to OS and HR land use designations, the allowable uses are comparable with one another and
both sets of uses can currently be found in the area around the project site within Riverside
County, the City, and San Diego County. All of the surrounding properties to the north and west
in unincorporated Riverside County have a General Plan designation of RM. To the east of the
project site, the County of Riverside designations are primarily OS -C and RM, with a small
amount of "Light Industial" and "Medium High Density Residential" along the east side of 1 -15.
To the east of the project site, the City of Temecula General Plan land use designations are
' primarily HR and OS, with a small amount of "High Density Residential" and "Neighborhood
Commercial" located east of 1 -15. South of the project site, in San Diego County the general plan
land use designations are primarily "Multiple Rural Use" with some "Public/Semi- Public Lands" I
and "Impact Sensitive" designated property.
E
The consistency of the proposed project with the policies of the Riverside County General Platt
and with the policies of the City of Temecula General Plan are described in Table 3.4 -3, City of
Temecula General Plan: Land Use Policies and Table 3.4-4, Riverside County General Plan, Land
Use Policies and Southwest Area Plan Policies. The amended SMAA can be viewed as being
consistent with most of the relevant policies of both the City's General Plan and the County's
General Plan.
As part of the amended project, the project area will be pre - zoned, with zoning designations
consistent with the City's chosen General Plan land use designations of OS and HR. This means
that areas designated OS will be pre -zoned OS -C -SM and areas designed HR will be pre -zoned
HR -SM by the City. Relevant provisions of the proposed HR -SM pre - zoning require any hillside
development plan to be designed to protect sensitive wildlife habitat areas, biological corridors,
native plants, and plant communities. The HR -SM zone supports interconnected, contiguous, and u
integrated open space systems within an area, particularly when located contiguous to open space
preserves as well as containing grading limitations, ridgeline protections and standards to reduce
green house gas emissions. The purpose and intent of the development standards under the
proposed HR -SM zone are to protect the value of the community and the subject property of
ridgelines, prominent landfonns, rock outcroppings, open space areas, hydrologic features,
' wildlife communities, unique and sensitive habitat and vegetation communities, and other natural,
AddmB W the OtYdTemewla Santa Maryanta Area Amreaallm 3 -9 ESA /208485.07
EIR January7010 i!
3. EmimnmenW1 Impacts ano Mitigation Measures
' biological, slid scenic resources. In addition, it is the intent of development and design under the
proposed HR -SM zone to preserve and enhance the visual and aesthetic quality of hillsides from
the surrounding community as well as promote and encourage a variety of high quality,
alternative architectural and energy efficient development designs and concepts appropriate for
hillside areas by utilizing the highest quality of prescribed standards. Lastly, the proposed HR-
SM zone is intended to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare and specifically protect the
public and property from hazards such as seismic, geologic, and fire.
In the General Plan Analysis, the County's RM land use designation and the City's HR land use
designation define the same level of residential use intensity in an area of steep slopes that impose
development constraints and limit land use activities to 1 DU /10 AC with ancillary uses.
However, the majority of the amended project area is zoned R -R with a small area zoned R -A -20
by Riverside County. Based on Riverside County's Land Use Designations — Zoning Consistency
Guidelines, the R -R zoning is considered to be "conditionally consistent" with the county's RM
land use designation and "inconsistent" with the county's OS -CH designation. R -A -20 zoning is
considered "inconsistent" with the county's OS -CH designation. Therefore, current Riverside
County zoning for most of the project area is inconsistent with County's current land use
designations.
Under the City's proposed HR zoning classification and the county's current R -R and R -A -20
zoning designations, there are a range of allowed use. While the residential uses under both
jurisdictions are about the same, the county's additional range of land use activities under R -R
and R -A -20 classifications, as set forth in Ordinance No. 348, include numerous permitted or
conditionally permitted commercial or business uses. However, the County's range of permitted
or conditionally permitted land uses in the R -R and R -A -20 zoning classifications include uses i
that are not described in the range of uses defined in the Riverside County General Plan's t
description for the RM land use designation, which is set forth above. Additionally, both of these
county zoning classifications contain uses which are not consistent with the land use limitations
imposed by the County's General Plan within the OS -HC designation.
By comparison, the City's proposed OS -C -SM zoning is comparable and consistent with the
County's OS -HC land use designation with the intent of conserving open space in a natural state
for the betterment and enjoyment of the community through preservation with opportunities for
limited recreational use. The City's choice of HR -SM zoning permits single- family residential
use which is consistent with the single- family residential use permitted in the county's RM land
use designation. Although, the City's list of permitted uses may preclude a number of uses
permitted or conditionally permitted under the County zoning, the City's proposed zoning will
permit the use of the subject property in a manner consistent with the current and proposed land
use designations (some incompatible uses the County's R -R zone currently allows include,
laundries, machine shops, oil refineries, and radio broadcast studies). Those uses lost, such as
surface mining, are uses that are likely to conflict with the existing and planned "rural residential"
and "habitat conservation" uses identified for these properties. The City's HR designation does
allow a number of uses other than residential (i.e. churches, educational facilities, libraries, day
' care centers, bed and breakfast establishments).
Addendum to the City of Teme4uta Santa Wri; iM Mac Amaaaton 3-10 ESA 1208485.02
EIR January2010
3. ErrAwmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Although there are inconsistencies between the County's general plan designations and zoning,
the City's proposed general plan designations and pre - zoning are generally consistent with the
County's general plan, and thus would not constitute a significant change in land use. Further, the
amended project site's existing land uses consist of natural open space over the vast majority of
the area, most of which is in the SMER, and six single- family homes with some agricultural and
equestrian activities. The City's proposed general plan designations and pre- zoning would
generally preserve the existing land uses, and the introduction of low density residential
development that might occur pursuant to the proposed land use regime would not constitute a
significant change from the existing conditions.
Finally, although mining may be a conditionally permitted use in parts of the proposed
annexation area under the County regulations, mining would represent a significant change in
land use from the open space and rural residential land uses that presently exist and that constitute
the baseline condition. A change in land use from existing uses to mining would be inconsistent
with policies designed to protect the environment and the character of rural mountainous areas,
including the SMER and County policies, including but not limited to:
• OS 20.1 Preserve and maintain open space that protects County environmental resources and
maximizes public health and safety in areas where significant environmental hazards and
resources exist.
' • OS 20.2 Prevent unnecessary extension of public facilities, services, and utilities, for urban
uses, into Open Space - Conservation designated areas.
And the following policies which apply to properties designated with the Rural Mountainous land
use designation on the area plan land use maps.
• LU 17.1 Require that grading be designed to blend with undeveloped natural contours of the
site and avoid an unvaried, unnatural, or manufactured appearance.
• LU 17.3 Ensure that development does not adversely impact the open space and rural
character of the surrounding area.
The proposed City land use regulations would not allow mining, therefore eliminating any
potential land use impacts that would result from mining. Although disallowing mining would
result in a significant impact to mineral resources, as discussed in Section 3.5 of the certified EIR,
it would not result in a significant land use impact. For the above described reasons, the project
will have less than significant impacts related to land use and zoning without any further need for
mitigation, regulatory compliance, or design considerations.
Changing the existing Riverside Comity Land Use designations of OS -CH and RM to City land
use designations of OS -CH and HR are considered compatible changes with minimal overall
differences and would have few impacts relevant to the general plan and zoning consistency
requirements. Therefore the land use and planning issues related to the SMAA have been
determined to be less than significant and no mitigation is necessary.
MCeMUm to the city of Tent"Wo Santa Margarita Area Mnawbw 3 -11 ESA/209455.02
EIR Iaowg20I0
3. EiAmmenfal Impacts and MXlgetion Maasurea
1 No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not �
necessary.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation was not required for Land Use and Planning impacts as determined by the certified
2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR; as such, no additional mitigation is required.
Level of Significance after Mitigation
No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Land Use and Planning
impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project -
specific and cumulative Land Use and Planning impacts of the proposed amended annexation
request would be less than those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation
FEIR. Therefore, Land Use and Planning impacts, as a result of the proposed amended
annexation request, would be to less than significant.
3.1.5 Mineral Resources
Existing Conditions
' The existing mineral resources setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions
contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Mineral resource impacts resulting from implementation of
the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.5 of the 2008 certified
FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request j
t
The amended project area is located within an area that until recently was classified as an MRZ-3
area, indicating that the significance of mineral deposits are undetermined from available data.
The portion of the proposed project site as outlined in the certified FEIR that contained the 155
acre Liberty Quarry site (which is now classified MRZ -2a) has been removed as part of the
amended annexation request. The remaining area, which is the amended annexation request
portion, is still classified M117-3. Therefore, it is undetermined whether the amended annexation
request area would result in zoning and general plan land use designations that would prohibit
mining of a known aggregate resource located within the amended project area that could result
in the loss of known mineral resources within the project area that would be of value to the
region. Although the amended annexation request area would be clearly less impactful as
compared to the project outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a restriction from the
potential of exploiting aggregate resources because this area is still classified as MRZ -3.
Therefore, the adopted statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for impacts that i
remain significant and unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the amended
annexation request.
Addendum to Ne City of Temecula Sonia Mmganta Area Annexation 3-12 ESA 1208685, 02
EIR January 2010 4i
3. Envirmmontal Into t and Mitigation Measures
' Mitigation Measures
As previously described, the City's General Plan and the County of Riverside's General Plan do
not identify any locally important mineral resource recovery sites within the amended SMAA as
determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. The amended
annexation request will not result in the loss of availability of locally - important mineral resource
recovery sites delineated on a General Plan, specific plan or other land use plan. Therefore,
mitigation was not required for the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan.
As previously stated, the portion of the proposed project site as outlined in the certified FOR that
contained the 155 acre Liberty Quarry site (which is now classified MRZ -2a) has been removed
as part of the amended annexation request. The remaining amended annexation request area is
still classified MRZ -3; therefore, it is undetermined whether the amended annexation request area
would result in zoning and general plan land use designations that would prohibit mining of a
known aggregate resource located within the amended project area that could result in the loss of
known mineral resources within the project area that would be of value to the region. Although
the amended annexation request area would be clearly less impactful as compared to the project
outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a restriction from the potential of exploiting
aggregate resources because this area is still classified as MRZ -3. Therefore, the adopted
statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain significant and
unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the amended annexation request.
I
Level of Significance after Mitigation
No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Mineral Resource impacts
as detenmined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project - specific and
cumulative Mineral Resource impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be less
than those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. However, as
previously described although the amended annexation request area would be clearly less
impactful as compared to the project outlined in the certified FEIR, there would still be a
restriction from the potential of exploiting aggregate resources because this area is still classified
as MRZ -3. Therefore, the adopted statement of overriding considerations as part of the FEIR for
impacts that remain significant and unavoidable to mineral resources would still apply under the
amended annexation request.
3.1.6 Public Services and Utilities
Existing Conditions
The existing public services and utilities setting and environment remain unchanged from those
discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Public services and utilities impacts resulting
from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section
3.6 of the 2008 certified FEIR.
Addendum to We city of remecula Santa MaWdta Area Annexation 3-13 ESA /208485.02
EIR January 2010
]. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
With the limited potential for additional dwelling units and compliance with city and state
building codes and the city's established development review, and building permit procedures,
the amended annexation request would not require a substantial change in existing public services
and utilities services provided within the project area. Therefore, the amended annexation request
not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental services and would not create the need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for fire services. Impacts associated with the amended annexation request would result
in a 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73%
dwelling units less) reduction in impacts to public services as compared to the originally proposed
annexation request. Impacts to public services and utilities associated with the previous
annexation request were determined to be less than significant and the public services and utilities
impacts associated with the amended annexation request would therefore be less than significant.
The amended project area is almost entirely vacant land with the potential to permit
approximately 22 single - family dwelling units. Temecula General Plan Policy GM /PFE 3.1
requires that development does not exceed the ability to adequately provide supporting police
services and to ensure an adequate response time for emergencies and to strive to provide one
' full -time officer per 1,000 residents for police (sheriff) protection services.
If the project area was built to its maximum capacity, the result would be an estimated additional
72 persons living within the project area. With the limited increase in population growth and the
current staffing levels, impacts to the police protection services would be less than significant.
Therefore, the amended project will not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities and will not create the
need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for police protection services.
A portion of the amended project site currently within the City's sphere of influence is located
within the boundaries of the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The balance of the project
site is located within the Murrieta Valley Unified School District's boundaries. There is the
potential for development of additional residential dwellings (22 dwellings). Due to the limited
number of residences that will be constructed within the project area, the proposed project will
contribute a limited number of additional students to the district. However, residential
development is required to pay a school impact fee which is designated to offset the cost of
constructing new schools. Therefore, potential impacts to schools are considered to be less than i!
significant. The proposed amended project would not result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered school facilities, or the need
for new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other
performance objectives for school services.
Addandum to the city ot TM a Santa Matgadta Area Annamflion 3 -14 ESA /20848502
EIR Janwary2010 �'
3. Environmental Impacts and MB pWn Measures
1 The basic park acreage standard for the City is 5.0 acres of usable City -owned parkland per
1,000 residents. Since the project area could be developed with approximately 22 single - family
homes there would be a minor impact on park facilities. Based on the highest estimated
population calculation, there could be 72 additional people living within the project area. With the
payment of the required fees, development within the project area would provide the necessary
funding for use in expanding the existing parks system. The payment of these mandatory
regulatory fees would offset the proposed project's impacts to park facilities and therefore the
project would have less than significant impacts to parks services.
The project site is served by existing libraries within the Riverside County Library System, which
operates two libraries within the City. The project area with the possibility for development of
approximately 22 additional single - family dwellings and a projected population of 72 people
would create an incremental demand for library services. Due to the small increase in potential
demand for library services, the project will have a less than significant impact upon library
facilities.
Future development in the amended project area would have to rely on water from private wells
and will not impact the existing entitlements of RCWD. As discussed above, homes served by
wells will need to put in a tank system that meets the City's fire -flow requirements. Therefore,
this project site is considered to have no impacts to available water supplies. The amended project !
site is within the service area of EMWD however, the remoteness and the topographical
constraints limit the serviceability of the area to current public wastewater facilities. Therefore,
development in the area will have to rely on septic systems for wastewater discharge. Since no
new service will be added to EMWD existing facilities there will be no need for construction of
new or expansion of existing wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, the amended project is
considered to have no impact to available wastewater treatment capacity.
Although the amended project area is under the jurisdiction of EMWD, wastewater treatment I
service is not provided into the project area. Existing properties rely on septic systems for
wastewater as will future development in the project area. Since no new service will be added
from expected development in the annexation area, the proposed project will not affect the
capacity of EMWD's existing facilities. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated that would affect
the wastewater treatment provider's current capacity or existing service commitments.
Given the limited contribution of construction - related solid waste anticipated to be generated by
the amended annexation request project when construction occurs, development of the project site
would not substantially contribute to the exceedance of the permitted capacity of the designated
landfills. Less than significant impacts to the existing landfills are expected. Given the limited
contribution of solid waste anticipated to be generated from the project area, future development
in the project area will not substantially contribute to the exceedance of the permitted capacity of
the designated landfills.
The amended project area is primarily undeveloped and all storm waters within the area drain to
the Santa Margarita River. This area is managed by Riverside County Flood Control and Water
' Conservation District; however, they have no existing facilities in the amended project area. It is
Mdv um to lSt Oty of Ta W Santa MrgMW Amt Ame tan 3.15 ESA/20 85.02
EIR January 2010 i.
i_
r-
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Mwwms
not likely that extensive drainage systems will be installed or necessary in the area due to the
topography and the limited development intensity of the land use designations. Storm
water /surface water in the area is currently discharged into the existing watershed area. As future
development occurs construction plans would be assessed for anticipated storm water run -off and
appropriate containment methods will be implemented to limit off -site impacts or the need for
off -site drainage facilities. Storm water drainage on -site would not require the expansion of
County Flood Control, nor require new facilities, and potential impacts to storm water drainage
facilities are considered to be less than significant.
Future development in the amended project area will use existing electricity service provided by
Southern California Edison. Some extension of service may be necessary into undeveloped areas
and will require assessment at the time of development review. Based on the current availability
of electrical service in portions of the project area, extensive infrastructure is not necessary and
the project would not significantly affect electrical services.
The amended project area is not currently served by Southern California Gas Company natural
gas service. Therefore development in the project area would be required to install propane
systems to meet their service needs, without adversely affecting the existing natural gas system. i
Therefore, future development in the project area would not affect the current service provider or €
natural gas services. €
' Future development in the amended project area would use existing service provided by Verizon.
Some extension of service may be necessary into primarily undeveloped areas and will require
assessment at the time of development review. Based on the current availability of
communication service in portions of the project area, extensive infrastructure is not necessary
and the project will not create a significant impact in communications services.
No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not
necessary. k'
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is
required.
Level of Significance after Mitigation N
No significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified
in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Implementation of these mitigation
measures would adequately ensure that project - specific and cumulative impacts of the proposed
amended annexation request would be reduced to less than significant levels.
1
moenwm to mo city of Temewa Serra Margarita Nea mneation 3 -16 ESA /208185.02
OR January 2010 'y
i
3. Envlronmentai Impacts and Mitigation Measures
3.1.7 Transportation and Traffic
Existing Conditions
The existing transportation and traffic setting and environment remain unchanged from those
discussions contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Transportation and traffic impacts resulting
from implementation of the originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section
3.7 of the 2008 certified FEIR.
Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
The traffic analysis under the certified FEIR noted that intersections and roadway segments
within the study area would operate at a deficient LOS including locations within the city of
Temecula, Riverside County, and San Diego County. Impacts to these intersections and roadways
segments would be reduced by approximately 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling
units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) under the amended annexation request,
as the revised project could develop up to 22 new dwelling units as compared to 81 under the
certified FEIR. Within the study area, impacts were noted at the following intersections or
roadway segments:
e 1 -15 Southbound Ramps /Rainbow Valley West Blvd intersection
e 1 -15 (Riverside County) from County boundary to Temecula Pkwy N roadway segment
e Rainbow Canyon Road roadway segment
The traffic analysis of the certified FEIR concluded that there were feasible mitigation measures
to mitigate the impact at the intersection of I -15 Southbound Ramps /Rainbow Valley West Blvd. j
This mitigation measure would require the installation of an all -way stop at this location.
However, as this intersection is outside of the jurisdiction of the city of Temecula, the city of
Temecula can not guarantee that this mitigation would be implemented in a timely fashion and
the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
However, there are no feasible mitigation measures for any project impacts related to 1 -15 for
those segments within Riverside County. Even if there were feasible mitigation measures,
implementing any mitigation measures by the city of Temecula would require the concurrence of
outside agencies such as Riverside County and Caltrans. Since there are no feasible mitigation
measures and improvements to the freeway are outside of thejurisdiction of the city of Temecula,
the impacts to 1 -15 within Riverside County remain significant and unavoidable.
The traffic analysis in the certified FEIR also concluded that there is a feasible improvement that
would mitigate the project impact along Rainbow Canyon Road. This improvement would entail
the widening of the roadway, which is anticipated by the Riverside County General Plan.
However, our review of available documentation indicates that this project is not included in the
regional traffic fee project (TUMF) and no funding has been allocated for this project at this time.
Additionally, this improvement is outside of the city of Temecula and the City would be unable to
' assure its completion. Therefore, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable.
Md nn to to City of Temecula Santa Margarita Mee Annexation 3 -17 ESA /20848502
EIR January2010
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional feasible mitigation
is available.
Level of Significance after Mitigation
A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain
significant and unavoidable. No other significant impacts are anticipated due to the adequacy of
the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR,
and the considerable reduced level of impacts associated with the reduced size of the proposed
annexation area. Implementation of these mitigation measures would lessen project - specific and
cumulative impacts of the proposed amended annexation request.
3.1.8 Noise
Existing Conditions
The existing noise setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions contained
in the 2008 certified FEIR. Noise impacts resulting from implementation of the originally !
proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.8 of the 2008 certified FEIR.
' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
As previously described, the Applicant is now proposing to submit a revised annexation
application to the Riverside County LAFCO to exclude 487 acres of the 4,997 acres previously
proposed in the certified Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. The 487 acres not part of this
amended project would include the area proposed for the Liberty Quarry Mine site and a few
adjacent parcels from the previously certified FEIR project. In essence, the amended annexation
request would reduce the component of potential development from 713 acres with a maximum
of 81 new dwelling units and 263 estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous
LAFCO application and evaluated by the certified FEIR, to 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new
dwelling units and 72 estimated new residents. The amended annexation request would
essentially result in a 73% (81 dwelling units reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units
less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in impacts, as compared to the previous annexation
request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. As such, implementation of the amended annexation
request would result in the following noise impacts as summarized in the tables on the following
pages.
MdeMUm b Ore City W TenwHla Santa Miagnrlla Area AenexadW 3 -18 ESA /208485.02
EIR January 2010
_ 3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
' EXISTING PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS I
ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS
I
Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a
Modeled Roadway Incremental Significant
Segment Existing Existing +Project Increaser' (Yes/Nor
La Paz St north of 60 60 0 No
Temecula Pkwy
La Paz St south of 50 51 1 No
Temecula Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy 68 68 0 No
east of La Paz St
Temecula Pkwy 67 67 0 No
west of La Paz St
Pechanga Pkwy
south of Temecula 66 66 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
east of Pechanga 66 66 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
west of Pechanga 68 68 0 No
Pkwy
' Rainbow Canyon
Rd south of 60 80 0 No
Pechanga Pkwy
Pechanga Pkwy
east of Rainbow 65 65 0 No
Canyon Rd
Pechanga Pkwy
south of Rainbow 65 65 0 No 1
Canyon Rd
a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of W feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak hour Lee Is approximately
equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Cakmns, 1996(, model was ran using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment.
is The numbers from exlsong were subtracted from existing plus project to show the Incremental increase.
c Considered significant if the incremental increase In noise is greater than 5 d5A Lee in a noise environment of 60 dBA Ldn or less, an
increase of 3 dBA Leq In a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and 65 dBA Lot. of an Increase of 1.5 dBA Leq in a noise
environment greater than 65 dBA Ldn.
SOURCE: Fher afd Peers, 2008; ESA. 2010.
t
(
f-
Addendam to the City of Terecma Sane Mxgarits Ara, Arvwxiion 3 ESA /20WS02
EIR January 2010 ti
j
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
1 FUTURE PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS
ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS
Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a
Existing +
Modeled Roadway Existing+ Ambient Growth+ Incremental Significant
Segment AmbientGrowth Project Increase (Yes/No)' !
La Paz St north of 60 60 0 No
Temecula Pkwy
La Paz St south of 50 50 0 No
Temecula Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy 68 68 0 No
east of La Paz St
Temecula Pkwy 67 67 0 No
west of La Paz St
Pechanga Pkwy
south of Temecula 66 66 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
east of Pechanga 66 66 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
west of Pechangs 68 68 0 No
Pkwy
' Rainbow Canyon
Rd south of 80 60 0 No
Pechanga Pkwy
Pechanga Pkwy
east of Rainbow 66 66 0 No
Canyon Rd
Pechanga Pkwy
south of Rainbow 66 66 0 No
Canyon Rd
F
a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak tour Leq is approximalely )
equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Csitrans, 1998), model was run using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment.
b The numbers from existing plus ambient growth were subtracted from existing plus ambient growth plus project to show the incremental
Increase.
c Considered significant if the incremental increase in noise Is greater than 5 dBA Leq in a noise environment of 60 dBA Ldn or less, an
Increase of 3 dBA Leq In a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and 65 dBA Ldn, or an increase of 1.5 dBA Leq in a miss
environment greater than 65 dBA Ldn.
SOURCE: Fehr and Peens, 2008: ESA, 2010. g
3
E
F
AldaM= to the City of Ternewla Santa Marganla Nea Annexation 3.20 ESA 1208485.02
EIR . nuary201q
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
CUMULATIVE FUTURE PM PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS
Weekday Noise Levels (Leq)a
Modeled Roadway Existing +Ambient Growth Existing+ Ambient Growth+ Incremental Significant
Segment + Cumulative Projects Cumulative Projects + Project Increase" (Yes/Nof I
La Paz St north of 62 62 0 No
Temecula Pkwy
La Paz St south of 50 50 0 No
Temecula Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy 70 70 0 No
east of La Paz St
Temecula Pkwy 70 70 0 No
west of La Paz St
Pechanga Pkwy
south of Temecula 69 69 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
east of Pechanga 69 69 0 No
Pkwy
Temecula Pkwy
west of Pechanga 71 71 0 No
Pkwy
Rainbow Canyon
Rd south of 63 63 0 No
Pechanga Pkwy f
Pechanga Pkwy
east of Rainbow 68 68 0 No
' Canyon
Pechanga
Pkwy
south of Rainbow 69 69 0 No
Canyon Rd
a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on weekday peak hour Leq is approximately
equal to the Ldn under normal traffic conditions (Caltrans, 1998), model was run using a 73% decrease of traffic on each segment.
b The numbers from existing plus ambient growth plus cumulative projects were subtracted from existing plus ambient growth plus
cumulative projects plus project to show the incremental Increase.
c
Considered er slgA Le t lithe incremental Increase in h is greater than 5 dBA Leq In a noise environment Le den Ldn or less, an
increase of 3 dBq In a noise environment greater r than 80 dBA and 05 dBA Ldn, or an increase of 1.5 dBA A Leq in a raise
environment greaa Le ter then 85 dBA IAn.
SOURCE: Fehr and Peers, 2008; ESA, 2010.
No significant project - specific impacts are expected.
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures contained in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
remain applicable to the proposed amended annexation request. No additional mitigation is
a
required. ,
a
Level of Significance after Mitigation
i'
A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as part of the FEIR for impacts that remain
significant and unavoidable. No other significant project - specific impacts are anticipated due to
the adequacy of the mitigation measures identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area
Addendum to the City of Teme la Sams Margarita Area Aonexw 3-21 ESA /208985.02
EIR Aanuan,2010
I
3. Environmental Impede and Mitigation Measures
Annexation FEIR Implementation of these mitigation measures would adequately ensure that
project - specific and impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be reduced to
less than significant levels. The amended annexation request would reduce the component of
potential development from 713 acres with a maximum of 81 new dwelling units and 263
estimated new residents, as proposed under the previous LAFCO application and evaluated by the
certified FEIR, to 225 acres with a maximum of 22 new dwelling units and 72 estimated new
residents. The amended annexation request would essentially result in a 73% (81 dwelling units
reduced to 22 dwelling units = 59 dwelling units less or 73% dwelling units less) reduction in
impacts, as compared to the previous annexation request, evaluated by the certified FEIR. A 73%
reduction in the amount of dwelling units would result in a reduced amount of noise from a
reduced amount of vehicle trips and reduced amount of temporary noise impacts from
construction.
3.1.9 Recreation
Existing Conditions
The existing recreation setting and environment remain unchanged from those discussions
contained in the 2008 certified FEIR. Recreation impacts resulting from implementation of the
originally proposed SMAA were discussed in detail within Section 3.9 of the 2008 certified
FEIR.
' Environmental Impacts- Amended Annexation Request
Based on the City's standard single - family occupancy rate of 3.24 persons per home the project
area could become home to approximately 72 additional residents. Through the payment of m-
lieu fees, dedication of parks, and the joint use of school facilities, the City anticipates having
sufficient parkland to meet the needs of the City residents through year 2013; as such, the I
increase in projected residents as part of the amended annexation request, should optimal
development occur, would be considered negligible. Therefore, the amended project would not
result in an increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated.
Through the payment of in -lieu fees, dedication of parks, and thejoint use of school facilities, the
City anticipates having sufficient parkland to meet the needs of the City residents through year
2013. Therefore, the 73 % reduction in potential new dwelling units under the amended project
would not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational
facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Project impacts on the
environment will be less than significant.
No significant project - specific or cumulative impacts are expected. Further evaluation is not
necessary.
Mdendum to the atyol TemecvM Santa MMrgota kea Mnwfion 3 -22 ESA 12084&5.02
EIR January 2010
l
3. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
1 Mitigation Measures
Mitigation was not required for Recreation impacts as determined by the certified 2008 Santa
Margarita Area Annexation FEIR; as such, no additional mitigation is required.
Level of Significance after Mitigation
No significant impacts are anticipated. Mitigation was not required for Recreation impacts as
determined by the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Project - specific and
cumulative Recreation impacts of the proposed amended annexation request would be less than
those identified in the certified 2008 Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR. Therefore,
Recreation impacts, as a result of the proposed amended annexation request, would be to less than
significant.
1
1
Addeadurn W M City of Temecula Santa Margadu Area Annaration 3-23 ESA 1208485.02
EIR Jaewary 2010
n
I•
}
CHAPTER 4
Findings
In accordance with Section 15090 of the CEQA Guidelines, the following findings are made:
t
1. The Addendum is the appropriate environmental clearance document to evaluate the t
Addendum to the Santa Margarita Area Annexation because the minor changes proposed will
not result in any new significant adverse environmental impacts which were not already
reviewed, analyzed, and/or mitigated in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR (SCH
No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22, 2008 (certified December 9, 2008).
2. It is the independent judgment of the Lead Agency that the Addendum includes updated data
and evaluations associated with the proposed project and that the findings and conclusions
from the Addendum will be considered by the Lead Agency prior to acting on the project.
3. The Lead Agency finds that the proposed project is not a new project, and does not change
1 the nature and scope of the project evaluated in the Santa Margarita Area Annexation FEIR
(SCI{ No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22, 2008 (certified December 9,
2008). There have been no substantial changes in the project requiring major revisions to the
previous documents, because any impacts of the prior project are reduced under the amended
project now under consideration.
t
4. The Lead Agency finds that the Addendum has been prepared, submitted and reviewed in t
accordance with requirements presented in Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, and is
complete and adequate in its evaluation of all environmental effects of the amended
annexation request. The amended annexation request will not result in any additional
significant, more severe, and/or unavoidable impacts that were not evaluated in the Santa
Margarita Area Annexation FOR (SCH No. 2007041085), City of Temecula, September 22,
2008 (certified December 9, 2008).
i
Add-" 101110 City W To.e W Same Mwg,11a Area m" .U. 4 -1 �
EIR ESA /208!85.02
January 2010
S
CHAPTER 5
Documents, Organizations, and
Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and
Abbreviations
5.1 Documents Consulted
The following documents were referred to as general information sources during preparation of
this document. They are available for public review at the locations noted. Some of these
documents are also available at public libraries and at other public agency offices.
Albert A. Webb Associates. 2008. Santa Margarita Area Annexation, Planning Application
PA07- 02225, Planning Application PA07 -0226, Environmental Impact Report EA -128
(SCH No. 2007041085). Prepared for the City of Temecula.
Bean, L.J., and F.C. Shipek. 1978. "Luiserio in California" in the flandbook of North American
' Indians, Vol. 8. W. C. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian htstitution: Washington,
D.C.
California Air Resources Board, AB 32 Fact Sheet and Timeline -- California Global Warming
Solutions Act of2006, September 25, 2006. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008
at http://www.arb.ca.aov/cc/facts/facts.litm)
California Chapter of the Association of Environmental Professionals, Alternative Approaches to
Analyze Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Global Climate Change in CEQA Documents,
Final, June 29, 2007. (Available at on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
www.califaeo.ore)
California Climate Action Registry, General Reporting Protocol, Version 2.2 March 2007.
(Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at http: / /www.climateregistry.orJ
Default.asnx7Tabl D= 3347 &refreshed= true) %20)
California Department of Conservation, Aggregate Availability In California, Map Sheet 52
(updated 2006), 2006. (Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department
and on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at littp: / /www.consrv.ca.eov /CGS/
information /publications/ins/MS 52 map. pd
California Department of Conservation, California Surface Mining and Reclamation Policies and t
Procedures, Guidelinesfor Classification and Designation ofMineral Lands, 2000.
(Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
http://www.coiisrv.ca.gov/SMGB/G`uidelines/ClassDesig.t)d
' b eMum to Na City d TamaMa S W Mar0aM1 Area Am xse 5-1 ESA/ 208485.02
EIR January 2010 yy
f
6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Anonyms and Abbreviations
' California Department of Conservation, Mineral Land Classification of the Granite Construction
Company Liberty Quarry Site, Temecula, Riverside County, California -For Portland
Cement Concrete -Grade Aggregate. Special Report 200, 2007. (Available for review at the
City of Temecula Planning Department.)
California Department of Conservation, Mineral Land Classification of The Temescal Valley
Area, Riverside County, Special Report 165, 1991'. (Available for review at the City of
Temecula Planning Department.)
California Department of Conservation, Update of Mineral Land Classification: Aggregate
Materials in the Western San Diego County Production- Consumption Region, 1996.
(Available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department.)
California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), 2008. California Natural Diversity Database
(CNDDB). Wildlife Habitat Data Analysis Branch, Habitat Conservation Division, CDFG,
Sacramento, CA.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement, 1998.
California Energy Commission, Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks:
1990 to 2004, Publication CEC -600- 2006 - 013 -SF, December 2006. (Available on the
Internet on February 7, 2008 at lute:// www .energy.e.t.gov /2006publications /CEC -600-
2006- 013 /CF.0 -600- 2006 - 013- SF.PDF
California Energy Commission, Our Changing Climate, Publication CEC -500 -2006 -077, July
2006. (Available on the Internet on November 20, 2007 at
http: // www. eiierjzy .ca.aov /2006publicatioiis/CE-C -500 -2006- 077 /CEC -500- 2006 -077 PDFI
California Energy Commission, Scenarios of Climate Change in California: An Overview, j
Publication CEC -500- 2005- 186 -SF, Published December 2005. (Available on the Internet
on February 7, 2008 at http:// www. energy .ca.Lov /20051)ublications /CFC -500 -2005-
186 /CEC -500- 2005 - 186 -SF. PDF)
California Executive Department, Executive Order S -3 -05 by the Governor of the State of
California, June 2005. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
h t tp: / /www. dot. ca.2ov/h(i/ energy /Exec` /`2OOrder %20 S- 3- 05.2df)
California Integrated Waste Management Board, Construction and Demolition Debris Recycling.
(Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at httD ://www.ciwmb.ca.eov /ColrDemo
California Integrated Waste Management Board, Construction and Demolition Materials.
(Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
htti)://www.ciwmb.ca.voy/ConDeino/Materials/def
California Integrated Waste Management Board, Jurisdictional Profile for Riverside County
(Unincorporated). (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
http: / /www.ciwmb ca eov /Profiles /Juris /JurProfilel ast) ?RG =U &JURID= 410 &TUR =River ;.
side° /o2 DUni ncomora ted
California Integrated Waste Management Board, Jurisdictional Profle for City of Temecula.
(Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
littn: / /www.ciwmb.ca.izov /Profiles /Juris/JurProfi le2.asi)?RG =C &JURID= 529 &JUIt =Tame
' — cula _
AaaeMMto PMGirya /ierrewla Sane Merparib Araa Amexeaon 5 -2 ESAi20M85.02
EIR denuary2010 {{
(1
t
1
6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations
' California Integrated Waste Management Board, Residential Waste Disposal Rates. (Available on
the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.ciwmb.ca.eov /wastechar/ ResDisp.htnT)
California Native Plant Society. 2008. CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants
of California (available online).
California Public Utilities Commission, News Release: PUC Sets GHG Emissions Performance
Standard to Help Mitigate Climate Change, January 25, 2007. (Available on the Internet on
February 7, 2008 at hitp:// docs.epuc.ca.pov /Published/NEWS RELEASE /63997.hhn
California State Senate, SB 1368, September 29, 2006. (Available on the Internet at
http: / /iiifo.seii.ca.aoy /pub /05- 06/bill /sen /sb 1351 -
1400/sb 1368 bill 20060929 chaotered.pddf on February 7, 2008)
Cato Geoscience, Inc., Aggregate Resources in the Temecula and Surrounding Inland Empire
Areas — Development Opportunities & Current Conditions, January 25, 2008. (This report
is contained in its entirety in Appendix D of this document.)
Chartkoff, I.L., and K.K. Chartkoff. 1984. The Archaeology of California. Stanford University
Press: Stanford, California.
City of Temecula, Final Environmental Impact Report, Temecula General Plan Update, March,
2005, Certified April 12, 2005. (Available the City of Temecula Planning Department,
43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, 951- 694 - 6444.) i
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan, April 2005. (Available at the City of Temecula
' Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, or on the Internet at
http: / /www cityofteinectila orJLeinecula /Goveminciit /CommDev /Zoning /eenerall)lln litnt
on January 10, 2008)
City of Temecula, Temecula General Plan Land Use Map, April 12, 2005, Map Prepared
February 1, 2007. (Available at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200
Business Park Dr., Temecula, CA 92590, or on the Internet on January 10, 2008 at
www citvofteinecula org Teinecul a/ GovenitnenUContmDev /Zoniiig/generalptaii hhn
City of Temecula Internet Site. (Available on the Internet on January 10, 2008 at
htti)://www.cityofteinecula.org
City of Temecula, Municipal Code, October 2007.
City of Temecula, (Draft) Plan,for Provision of Municipal Services, Planning Applications No.
P07 -0225 and PA07 -0226, Annexation of the Santa Margarita Area to the City of
Temecula, California, December, 2007. (Available for review at the City of Temecula
Planning Department, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590.)
Claude, Hart T. County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use, Electronic
Communication in regards to Surface Mines in San Diego County dated August 23, 2007.
County of Riverside, Riverside County General Plan, Adopted October 7, 2003. (Available for
review at the County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA
92501, or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
http://www.rctlma.orp—/Reiieralt)lan/index.html
MdeMUm to Na C of Te 1, Santa M arita Area Amaxeepn 5.3
rty ar0 ESA /208a85.a2
EIR Janearyxlo
f'.
r
6. Documents, Organintiom. and Persons Conwlted, and Acronyms and AbbrWatiom
' County of Riverside, General Plan: Existing Settings Report, Revised in March 2000, Adopted
October 7, 2003. (Available for review at the Comity of Riverside Planning Department,
4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200, and at the City of Temecula
Planning Department.)
County of Riverside, Geographic Information System Database. (Available for review at the
County of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951-
955 -3200, or on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
http://www3.tliiia.ro.riverside.ca.us/pa/rclis/iiidex.litml
County of Riverside, Ordinance No. 348 - Regulating Land Use. (Available for review at the
Comity of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501,
951- 955 -3200, or on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
www.tlma.co.riveiside.ca.us/ planning (coiiteiit /zoiiiue %rdnaiice /ord348 article htmil
County of Riverside, RCIP General Plan Land Use Designations - Zoning Consistency
Guidelines. (Available for review on the Internet on February 15, 2008 at
ht tD://www.rctlma.org(generalolan /zoning htmi
County of Riverside, RCIP General Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report, August 14, 2002.
(Available for review at the Riverside County Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street,
Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200 or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
litt
County of Riverside, Riverside County Integrated Project General Plan Final Program
' Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2002051143), March 2003.
(Available for review at the Riverside County Planting Department, 4080 Lemon Street,
Riverside, CA 92501, 951- 955 -3200 or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
litti)://www.rctlma.org/peiierair)laii/index.fitml
County of Riverside, Southwest Area Plan, October 7, 2003. (Available for review at the County
of Riverside Planning Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, 951 -955-
3200, or on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
http://www.rctlliia.orv-/aenera]Rlaii/al2 I /awal2 html
County of Riverside, Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan,
Adopted June 17, 2003. (Available for review at the County of Riverside Planning
Department, 4080 Lemon Street, Riverside, CA 92501, or on the Internet on February 11,
2008 at www.rciu.org
County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use, San Diego County General Plan,
January 2, 1979. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at http://www.co.sau-
diego ca us/cnty /cntydentsAanduse/ planning /gpupdate/pubs /existin r IIitnil
County of San Diego, San Diego County Code, current though July 25 2008. t
County of San Diego Fallbrook Planning Area Land Use Map, April 29, 2004. (Available on the
Internet February 8, 2008 at bttp://www.sdcouiity,ca.2ov/clT)lu/iiidex.litiiil to
littp://Nvww.sangis.org/LibraryService/ DownloadedFi les/Igpcpafallbrookjpg
Cunnif, Patrick, Environmental Noise Pollution, 1977.
Addendum to the Gilt W Temecula Santa Ma aMa Nea A ontlm 5-4
r9 ESAI20aCaa.02
Elft
January 20 10
I"
8. Documents. Organizations, and Pemws Consulted. and Acmwns and Abbrevis8ons
' Eastern Information Center California Historical Resources Information System, Cultural
Resources Records Search, RS 14006, June 29, 2007. (The results of this records search are
considered to be confidential by the Eastern Information Center and are on file at the City
of Temecula Planning Department. They are only available for review by qualified
archaeologists.)
Fagan, B.M. 1995. Ancient North America: The Archaeology of a Continent. Thames & Hudson:
New York
Fagan, B.M. 2003. Before California: An Archaeologist Looks at Our Earliest Inhabitants.
AltaMira Press: Walnut Creek, California.
Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, Effects of Aviation Noire ofAwakenings./rom Sleep,
1992.
Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2006.
Fehr and Peers Transportation Consultants, Traffic Impact Study Report, Santa Margarita Area
Annexation, City of Temecula, CA, Riverside County, September 2008. (This report is
contained in its entirety in Appendix C of this document.)
The Gas Company, E -mail correspondence from Bruce R. Waddell for service availability,
December 13, 2007.
Hickman, J.C. led.), 1993. The Jepson Manual of Highcr Plants of California. University of
' California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.
The History of Temecula. Available for review on the City of Temecula Internet site at
www.cityoftemecula.orjy-/teinecula/x Accessed on February 8, 2008.
Holland, R.F. 1986.Califomia Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Preliminary Descriptions
of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California.
i
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis,
Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 2001. (Available for review on the
Internet on February 7, 2008 at htti)://www.gi-ida.iio/climate/il2ce tar /wel /index.htm
Kohler, Susan, 2006, Aggregate Availability in California: California Geological Survey, Map
Sheet 52 and report. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
htty: /Iwww consmv. ca. gov/ cu/ inf onnation /publications/ins/Docuineiits/MS 52.13d
Legislative Counsel of California, AB 32 — California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,
September 2006. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
lmttp : //Nvww.lcginfo.ca.gov/pub /05 -06 /bill /assn /ab 0001 -
0050/ab 32 bill 20060927 chaptered Odf e
F
1.
Leighton and Associates, Inc., 2007, Final Mineral Resource Report, Merriam Mountains
Property, San Diego County, California: Prepared for the Merriam Mountains Specific
Plan (NNP- Stonegate Merriam, L.L.C), draft report released 2005, Leighton and
Associates, Inc., 3934 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite 310, San Diego, CA 92123, 21 p.
' Addwfd to IM Oty of T=m Ia Sella MergaM Nea Mnema 5-5 ESA/ 208485.02
EIR January 2010
I!
6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and AGonyms and Abbreviations
' Marian Koshland Science Museum of the National Academy of Sciences Internet Site. (Available
on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at www.koshland- science - museum oriz
Mayer, Kenneth E., and William F. Laudenslayer. 1988. A Guide to Wildlife Ilabitats of
California. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA Facts: The Balance of Power in the
Earth -Sun System, 2005. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
http / /eospso 2sfc uasa eov /ftp does /NASA- Facts- EnerRyBalance odfl
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Greenhouse Gases -Frequently Asked
Questions. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
http: / /lwfncdc.noaa .eov /oa /cliinate/izases htinl
ParkNet. 2008. National Register Information System, Search by Location with links to Web
pages. http://www.nr.nos.voy/iirlocl.htin Search Parameters "CA" state code, "Temecula"
city. Accessed on September 3, 2008.
PCR Services Corporation, Air Quality Impact Analysis, Santa Margarita Area Annexation,
August 26, 2008. (This report is contained in its entirety in Appendix B of this document.)
Pechanga Band ofLuiseno Indians — History. (Available for review on the Pechanga Tribe
Internet site on February 8, 2008 at http: / /www.i)echanea- nsn.eov
Revey, Gordon F. Blasting Impacts Assessment jar Proposed Idaho - Maryland Mine, 2003.
' Riverside Transit Agency, Internet Site. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008
at www.riversidetransit.com
Riverside County Waste Management Department, E -mail correspondence from Sung Key Ma,
Planner IV for landfill capacity, January 14, 2008.
San Diego State University, Field Station Program, Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve Internet
Site. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at ht_!p:Hfs.sdsu.edu/kf /reserves /sorer
San Diego State University Field Station Programs and South Coast Wildlands, A Linkage Design
for the Santa Ana - Palomar Mountains Connection, May 2004. (Available on the Internet
February 8, 2008 at htti):// www .scwildlands.org /rei)orts.asi)x to
} btt p:// www .scwildlands.oriz /reports/SCML SantaAna Palomarmd
San Diego State University, Field Stations Program. (Available on the Internet on February 8,
2008 at httl3://fs.sdsu.edu/kf/resei-ves/siner/habitat.phi)
San Diego State University, Masters Thesis — Determining Suitable Wildlife Crossing Locations
across a Souther Califoria Interstate, Philip Gibbons, Spring 2008
South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993, with
November 1993 Update. (Available for review at South Coast Air Quality Management
District, 21865 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 - 4182.)
South Coast Air Quality Management District, 2007 Air Quality Management Plan, June 2007.
(Available for review at South Coast Air Quality Management District, 21865 East Copley
' Addendum to the City f Temewb Santa Ma arils Area Ant�eaitim 5-6 ESA/
208485,U
re 20N83.02
EIR Jart.q W
i
6. 0muments, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations
' Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 -4182 or on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
htti) / /www arc ind ov /aqm�/07aQmi) /index html
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Guidance Document forAddressing Air Quality
Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, May 6, 2005. (Available on the Internet at
htti)://www.aqmd.jzoy/prdas/aqguideldoe/ag guidance oddf on February 7, 2008.)
South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Data. (Available for review at South
Coast Air Quality Management District, 21965 East Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA
91765 -4182 or on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
www.aciind.izov/smog/ilistoricaldata.htin)
South Coast Wildlands, South Coast Missing Linkages— A Wildland Network for the South
Coast Ecoregion, Undated
Southern California Association of Governments, 2004 RTP Growth Forecasts. (Available for
review on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at www.scalx.ca.vov/forecast/index.hti and
available for review at Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), 818 West
Seventh Street 12th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017 -3435, 213- 236- 1800.)
Southern California Association of Governments, The New Economy and Jobs /Housing Balance
in Southern California, April 2001. (Available for review on the Internet on February 11,
2008 at www.scaiz.ca.jzox
r
Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Internet Site. (Available for review on the Internet
' on February 8, 2008 at htti)://www.iiietrolijiktrains.com
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Survey
Geographic (SSURGO) database. (Available on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
http://www.ncizc.iircs.usda.goy/t)roducts/datasets/ssurg:o )
United States Department of Agriculture, On -line Soil Surveys. (Available on the Internet on
February 8, 2008 at httt): / /www.soils.usda.gov /survey /online survevs/california/
w riverside/ maps/esm.A
U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 1995. National Register Bulletin 15: How s
to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. Washington, DC: National Park
Service.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Climate Change Kids Site. (Available on the
Internet at http://www.epa.gov/climatechaiiiie/kids/index.html on February 7, 2008.)
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and Sinks: 1990 -2005, April 15, 2007. (Available on the Internet on February 7, 2008 at
http: / /www epa. gov/ climatechanee /emissioiis/usitiventorvreport htinl
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Municipal and Industrial Solid Waste Division,
Characterization of.Building- Related Construction and Demolition Debris in the United
States, by Franklin Associates, Office of Solid Waste Report No. EPA 530 -R -98 -010, June
1998. (Available on the Internet on February 11, 2008 at
www.qpa.jzov/el?aoswer/hazwaste/sg fl
MdeM mto Me City ofTwew4 Sara Wrgaru Area Mneaaeon 5-7 E A/ e
S 209 85.02
EIR Jammy2010
S
6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Conwtted, and Acmnyma and Abbreviations
' United States Environmental Protection Agency, Noise from Construction Equipment and
Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances, 1971.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, AP -42, Fifth Edition, Volume I, Chapter 13.3
(Available on the Internet on September 5, 2008 at
http: / /www.epa.gov /ttn /chief /ap42/ch 13 /final /c 13s03.pdo
United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Six Common Air Pollutants ". (Available on
February 7, 2008 on the Internet at www.cl)a.gov/air/urlianair/6t)oll.htinl
United States Fish and Wildlife, Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit No. TE088609 -0, June 22,
2004. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
www.fws.gov/carlsbad/WRV MSHCP BO html
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Western Riverside Multiple Species Habitat
Conservation Plan Biological and Conference Opinion (FWS -WRIV- 870.19), June 22,
2004. (Available for review on the Internet on February 8, 2008 at
www.fws.eov /carlsbad/WRV MSHCP BO htm
Warren C. N. 2004. "The Desert Region" in California Archaeology. By M. J. Moratto. Coyote
Press: Salinas, California. Reprinted from 1984, Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.
The following reports and studies are contained in the Technical Appendices far the Santa
Margarita Area Annexation Environmental Impact Report (SCH 2007041085). (A copy of the
Technical Appendices is available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department,
' 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, 951- 694 - 6400.) S
Air Quality Impact Analysis, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, Albert A. Webb Associates,
January 18, 2008.
Trq& Impact Study Report, Santa Margarita Area Annexation, City of Temecula, CA, Riverside
County, Albert A. Webb Associates, February 1, 2008.
Aggregate Resources in the Temecula and Surrounding Inland Empire Areas — Development
Opportunities & Current Conditions, Cato Geoscience, Inc., January 25, 2008.
Addendum the City dTamecWa Santa Mtarganta Mae AmaxadOn 5 -$ ESAl209605.02
EIR
January2010
i<
6. Documents, Organizations and Persons Consulted and Acronyms and Abbreviations
' 5.2 Organizations and Persons Consulted
City of Temecula Planning Department
Patrick Richardson, Director
Betsy Lowrey, Assistant Planner
Riverside County Planning Department
Jerry Jolliffe, Principal Planner
County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use
Claude T. Hart, Sr. Civil Engineer
Fehr and Peers
Christopher Gray, Associate
PCR
Heidi Rous, CPP Associate Principal, Director of Air Quality Services
Amy Kidd, Environmental Analyst
San Diego State University Field Station Programs
Matt Rahn, Ph.D., Director
1
' Addanduo to me City of Temecula Santa Marganta Am Anneaalion 5-9 ESAIM48502
EIR January 2010
6. Documents, Organizations, and Pe Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations
5.3 Documents Preparation Staff
ESA, Planning and Environmental Services
Eric Ruby, Project Director
Chris Knopp, Project Manager
Mitch Marken, Cultural Resource Director
Kim Maeyama, Associate
Paul Miller, Senior Managing Associate
Donald Ambroziak, Associate
Jason Nielson, Graphic Artist
Gus JaFolla, Word Processor
City of Temecula
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
Bob Johnson, Assistant City Manager
Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment
Betsey Lowrey, Assistant Planner
k"
i-
I
j
' AddaMUm to me Gtyd Temecula Santa Margedts Area Ameaallen 6 6-10 ESA / 20aa6 .D2
5
EIR January 2010
6. Documents, Organizations, an Perso Consulted and Acronyms and Abbreviations
5.4 Acronyms and Abbreviations
µg/m Micrograms per Cubic Meter
I DU /10 AC One Dwelling Unit per 10 Acres
AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards
AB 1327 California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Act of 1991
AB 939 California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989
AB Assembly Bill
AQIA Air Quality Impact Analysis
AQMD Air Quality Management District
AQMP Air Quality Management Plan
ARB Air Resources Board
BLM Bureau of Land Management
C &D Construction and Demolition
CAA Clean Air Act
CAL Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Caltraus California Department of Transportation
' CARB California Air Resource Board
CASSA Critical Area Species Survey Area
CAT Climate Action Team
CBC California Building Code
CCR California Code of Regulations
CDFG California Department of Fish and Game
CDMG California Department of Mines and Geology
CEC California Energy Commission
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CESA California Endangered Species Act
CETAP Community and Environmental Transportation Plan
CPC Chlorofluorocarbons
CFL Compact Fluorescent Light
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
F
CH Methane
City City of Temecula
CIWMB California Integrated Waste Management Board
CNDD13 California Natural Diversity Data Base
CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level
Addendum to the City of Temecula Santa Margarita Area Aaresxtlon ESA /205085.02
EIR January 2010
6. Documents, Organiza4ons, and Persons Consulted. and Acronyms and Abbreviations
' CNPS California Native Plant Society
CO Carbon Monoxide
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
CO2e Carbon Dioxide Equivalent
Corps United States Army Corps of Engineers
County County of Riverside
CPUC California Public Utilities Commission
CSS California Sage Scrub
CWA Clean Water Act
dB Decibels
dBA A- weighted Decibels
DIF Developer Impact Fees
DNL Day -night Noise Level
DPM Diesel Particulate Matter
du Dwelling Unit
EIC Eastern Information Center
FIR Environmental Impact Report
' EMWD Eastern Municipal Water District
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
EPS Emission Performance Standard
ESA Federal Endangered Species Act
FHWA -RD -77 -108 Federal Highway Administration's Highway'rraffic Noise Prediction Model
FICON Federal Interagency Committee on Noise
FIND Facility Information Database
FTA Federal Transit Administration
GHG Greenhouse Gas(es)
GLO General Land Offices
gpd Gallons per Day
GPM Gallons per Minute
GWP Global Wanning Potential
H2O Water
H2S Hydrogen Sulfide
HANS Habitat Evaluation and Acquisition Strategy
I'
HC Habitat Conservation
HCP Habitat Conservation Plan
Addendum to the City d Temecula Santa Wrgadta Area Amoxa 5-12 ESAI2 85.02
EIR January 2010
r
6'.
6. Dxuments Organizations and Persons Consulted and Acronyms and Abbrev iations
HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons
HR Hillside Residential
HRA Health Risk Assessment
HR -SM Hillside Residcntial -Santa Margarita
Hz Hertz
1 -15 Interstate15
I -215 Interstate 215
I -405 Interstate 405 (San Diego Freeway)
I -710 Interstate 710 (Long Beach Freeway)
I -8 Interstate 8
IA Implementing Agreement
IECC International Energy Conservation Code
IPCC Intergovernmental Plan on Climate Change
km Kilometer
kWh Kilowatt hour
LAFCO Riverside County Local Agency Formation Commission
L� Equivalent Sound Level
' L, Instantaneous Maximum Noise Level
LOS Level of Service
LST Localized Significance Threshold
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MEIR Master Environmental Impact Report
mgd Million Gallons per Day
MM Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale
MRZ Manufacturing Service Commercial
MSHCP Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
msl Mean Sea Level
MWh Megawatt hour
N Nitrous Oxide
NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NCCP Natural Community Conservation Plan
NEPSSA Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Areas t
NH Ammonium Nitrate
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
Mdandum to Na City a T.me�a Santa Mar�adta area Amaaawn 5 -13 esA[20"85.02
EIR Janua y NIO
it
I D
3.
6. Documents, Organizations, and Persons Consulted, a Acronyms and Abbreviations
' NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NMVOC Non -CH4- Volatile Organic Compounds
NO Nitric Oxide
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
NOP Notice of Preparation
NO Nitrogen Oxides
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
OJ Ozone
ODS Ozone Depleting Substances
OHP Office of Historic Preservation
OPR (Governor's) Office of Planning and Research
OS -C Open Space - Conservation
OS -CH Open Space - Conservation Habitat
OS -C -SM Open Space - Conservation —Santa Margarita
PAC Project Area Committee
P -C Production - Consumption
PCC Portland cement concrete
' PFCs Perfluorocarbons
r
PM -10 Particulate Matter (less than 10 microns)
PM -2.5 Particulate Matter (less than 2.5 microns)
PPM Parts per Million
PPV Peak Particle Velocities
PRC Public Resource Code
PSI Pounds per Square Inch
R -A -20 Residential agriculture with a 20 acre minimum lot size
RCIP EIR Riverside County Integrated Program General Plan Final Environmental
Impact Report
RCIP Riverside County Integrated Plan
RCPG Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide
RCWD Rancho California Water District ?:
RM Rural Mountainous
RMS Root mean square
ROG Reactive Organic Gas
R -R Rural Residential
RTA Riverside County Transit Authority
' RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
Addendm 10 the Clty d Temewla Santa I Bari a Area A eaa80n 5 -14 ESA /208085.02
EIR January 2010
i
6. Documents, OrganlmtJws, and Persons Consulted, and Acronyms and Abbreviations
' RTP Regional Transportation Plan
RWQCB Regional Water Quality Control Board
SAPML Santa Ana - Palomar Mountain Linkage
SB Senate Bill
SCAB South Coast Air Basin
SCAG Southern California Association of Governments
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
SDSU San Diego State University
SF Sulfur Hexafluoride
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer
SIP State Implementation Plan
SMAA Santa Margarita Area Annexation
SMARA Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975
SMER Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve
SMGB State Mining and Geology Board
S02 Sulfur Dioxide
SR State Route
i
' SRA Source Reception Area
SSRE Source Reduction and Recycling Element
SUSMP Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan
SVP Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
SWANCC Ruling Solid Waste Agency of North Cook County vs.
United States Army Corps of Engineers
SWAP Riverside County General Plan Southwestern Area Plan
SZ Scientific Resources Zone
TACs Toxic Air Contaminants
Temecula EIR Final Environmental Impact Report for the Temecula General Plan Update
Tpd Tons per Day w
is
TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
U.S. United States
URBEMIS Urban Emissions Software
USFWS Untied States Fish and Wildlife Service
V/C Volume -to- Capacity
VdB Vibration Decibels
VMT Vehicle Miles Traveled
VOC Volatile Organic Compound
WDR Waste Discharge Requirement
c
AdEerdum to the Clty of TememAS Santa Margarita Area Ameaatian 5-15 ESA /2pda85.02
ER January2010 F
4
EXHIBIT C
Statement of Overriding Considerations
The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection
with the proposed approval of the Santa Margarita Area Annexation No. 2 (the
"Project ").
CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance the economic, legal,
social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable
environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of
the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered
acceptable. CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the
specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are
unavoidable. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the EIR or
elsewhere in the administrative record. The reasons for proceeding with this Project
despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this
Statement of Overriding Considerations.
The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project
outweigh the significant and unavoidable air quality impacts, mineral resources
impacts, noise impacts, and transportation and traffic impacts. In making this finding,
the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable
' impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The City
Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the
other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable
environmental impacts of the Project.
A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been
imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent
feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because they
generally have similar or greater impacts, and do not provide the benefits of the
Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the
Statement of Facts and Findings.
B. The Project will provide the City of Temecula with control over the
possible uses at the Project site and will ensure that the land is used according to the
City of Temecula General Plan designations and zoning requirements thereby ensuring
the type of ultimate development.
C. The proposed Project will provide the City of Temecula with 4,284 acres
designated as "Open Space — Conservation Habitat" for the enjoyment of the City's
residents.
D. The proposed Project will protect and maintain the research value of the
' Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve ( "SMER ") benefitting the City and the State by
ensuring the research potential in the SMER.
The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the
Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City
Council further finds that each of the individual Project benefits discussed above
' outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final EIR and
therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that each of
the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to
override these unavoidable environmental impacts.
U
d w
EM
O =
co R
q� z
. J
u3
w N
W . ..
z >
¢ Q ¢
W EE
a
H O C O U O U O
a O Q O F O F
rc �
d
z a w
z
c o 0
m o 0
0 0
inc c y ° °di y ° ° did
�' C y 10 U N C ' U fO C •
O V n rn C rna C
N � d C J d d Cc o d
abE co CL co
c o
O' z —U O 7
a
c7 O
Z~ Q a o c o w
0: «=�' 'v d Ti a3t c_w
Ow .o.m 2c2
W Z o f v m c j K A m m
KQ D fa a`c9U O a
ZQ F
Z m �
Q Q 2 d d c N
Z H W .� � a 3 d r o
0� �� o2 9m3 N c« a v w
d O. N w y 'O W : O O C w N C
U N j N C
Z d= d C J O> d y N 4 w jp 'fb
O E _y .d'W NOI t w d and
�Q d0 M Ma ca aNO.E m'y a m dm
w m._o,E90 n
Z EO w wcd w ai 0 ga
Q Q � N E 2 w � O E n w m N m d L
L d y o a;
(741 L^O .5!` L w = > ow 3`o ro � a me
U O C N U K d J C d E w
w of d w m�dw C O
E O Nw yC
U` J U d .o. w O� 2 0 U a J°
d C w Q( C d
C a
o d E w c a v 3 d d
� dod-- da Vi c' zm my
N y N N O j o w N N iis
N
p� M O M t M«
H�
d d d C d p C E Y d w d x d y d O p
d d 0 d d'�y d y d d d d d d d d._ d 0.
0 0� o° 0 C z'd `oc o0 0"d 8
ao ad >> "d2o aE:' a.o i7d =,oE a
m «�-'w� _rnac of _mm WE=E`
N
d d
~ U
Co N o H d d W N N r p C L 1p 0 F
d >.c d amm dd«
C Nddd OOd C NN�.�c CaCd Nr'C W rK
d � 0• C T p C r 0.= T w- ? 6 0 w d C� 3 d m U w
`o y�' ri c m i m nY H d a E w c c a: o
0 ° '
V d wS w n y c.� m v w m a w m E d d a° °t"
W E < Eac ° c E au� 5a
u
m N
6 Na
3
G C
U y
00
m9
c y
m "
C T
m m m
`o�
O Q U N U y U m
� r r r
z
i m
3 y n n n
0 0 0
r 0 m m >
Z 0 d d m
w m ❑ ❑ ❑
I
IL
0
-1 m € `o 0
j incc $a sm=« Im o«
uj 2 ¢ yD „'o ma yams
LA y m y N
7 2 - U c0 (7 C7
r0
� F
LL rn m rn
C Ol y C y C MW
O W U m M0 m 'p °
y C _ y C m m
C LL Z N D* 5 L U� C C L C
U� J
G Z C m min C O) O J C Mca C
Q p L C 'o m C m m
ug fa ' a '
❑ ❑ ❑
¢ An ° C T mn y
r _o y2cy a y5 c c = «Q o ° c cm n mEcd m¢ a
H a m m N Q G N m �. m o M cJ� a d 3 N M m `O y« c o Q N m y
0 T
v o m.� N Z F m v o p n" c :: o w> c J m t m.- to 2 m °
�� m NILyJ «oa m > o ti a`m m' - �2�Ay M%7f 0 dQ.. m0 mJ Moa
WAG oZt °U�a'i�°u'0 mN �Ea � owv -. ccm mo ° m.- - O y`_° O N
m M o m m �+ c._ m m c C L U c m m Mo
¢ 'm a 3 0_ m 0 o m ..- - - =` o- > « o w c n n c m E o Z c c d m �, c r m
ZZ v' m S wm E M, `od °aY mOr ,°�`°d. - K m2o,o =mE n:z
Q¢ `ca oa (1) CL 0`0 y m y m N o.2 m o a M 0 0 Ot 3OUm ca oaCna mmm..my
CA y0cc�m0 m °c c w ) ' ` 0 md� o o o y ' u0E` m ccc�m 012. .mew
Z � UEE00N>a_a °Cm�E"O0 ao.y U o m = - °£vw ° >c d a wo
KF c a -U O m pyym�a...c m'wm UOmu
'ma u xx m¢ o =-M mo °
tSm «so c a; c m x
O y U L Q
am= N U y O N J m m Ol y C y O m Q y C_ L N 9 y
r u "TY''_FLQC2 >m n2w mm M o v - y T maOcMNmm
m
Z o c o'o u t m m li 'b man di a . n o L ` = N a u 2` c o'o v 10 m �'�
o m m n 3-e a_ m m o m$= y J m y n- J c w._ v U m m o ° E F e o m m
n m a c m M m ui ?@= d 4J n£ w LL O' « m L m _° y m m - 0 n c m K O o? e d V)
Z 8iS me d > my O T-o C J .5 E:e mT= `m c > ° Zd
0 5Cw up m j<o x�od_md2? Bi U ��i�m;Qc Ja CO u om ��c�L `m
LL_ c T> 3 tn c E m c rn a a.N m m Ti m o m m m S v c > 3 N c E m c M
10
F a ° a m e B . y y m m$ U w LL r m n aK_ E y a w E 10 m r
Q N V n- m N 46 N N C n T y C 3 ° m
C . V N m y Q O N = L .. U N N Z O m m 26's 2
M y m� n n N m a m a N O Vnia p O U w d'UQ yai Amoy m ^ M atn3 QV� fr
O J C C L N C(O N m � — O J. L m 0 a m m m O M C m y p m m v � m E y m m= 6 t E 0
° m y m C " = G c O fG y C y N C= n H C T> T>.O r N 4 c O c W O m
m 2Emo VOQ y.�. m a"m" rym�, >dNCN m VOQ y..S�N Z.Lu m - m c y N d y a m c o f i� m m E 0
.3 E 12 o c
a 2a Ewo�U N mE m acMo, ; c`c,`w ° m ,u doo a- - °rEdv UommE
mrn W a as m `o >cOn w--a c i0 u..:w m>p _d .o ��a a.�
a i+T n n J Q..a�aQE =o w.>- .•c.o>U>�3'vm W y °nJ O- =a�`!o oEJtO LLJ
f a N it o x f0 m� U LL L)) m C C 9 gy N y m U M n o a= C f m N N K O= l0 m U N LL
T m C
m m m� m
r u m n m c
c ° w o ° ma= yNON °m �:io m m T� «a�m`oU) °.
fA m n' N a 0 2 m L o m B 0 U 'p� _ C .L.� N n > N m O C >, `_ CD U
E m �„� > !g $ �;= ;O m 0 vi o C o
C.. O �LCmJmy ° >y 6 wtCO�0 a 0 a20
D O '$ vy m o voryo m C72 u o `° -mtiE� m0
>n c aomn � ° o �� =m�m'o y riini ao�a acE - °m Ma
w - m Ea0 0moEmmm — a�U7 Eau J m me mu�nvU
u
A N
6
E C
-6 U y
°
35
r N
c 'C
m >
m
Q
q C T m N
'c W U Ua
y 0 Q F ~
Z
S m
3
c c e
~ as >
w m o a
IL
w mcc
w N c' «m °�`ma �ma
D 4 tR a A c c A c rn
KZ aC E w t oa of 'o
Yl 10- Vl O
�ZO _U Cam' Ua
7
LL
LL
OW � "m
c ° a 3 `-
LL Z E N C� � L O 01 Ot' m
1 S c 3 C
�Z O
Cm MCD mr c MV
0 V'� C 1;
a Q O L � 9 M m j O: Too m O C G
aW f o;a m o c� a mo U
C?
Q a
m Cpm Oo c l -
K a u d o ° m'r°- - O c c o�
Z a
Q c L L co ' o y c « .� 3 3 m �' .� nt a O € E y E m r c c a m
KO °'�' 3 3 G€ y c c c c o - '" U c do �mct4 dc c �; 0 m
ycN p. �gj Om dd .°_ or N € o 0U � ui !e m a m
a Q U N m N p 0) C E m OI 0 a . U a m m V l0 a N
Lu v!e m '�c�w �On< xmM _m waU a wm�o mm'°cw2
LL' MM- mom cOtco oL ' -m2N'3 :! -3 v y$amV;
OH o.w E'3 Ll I'& �m w.« w
, 0o > `o tn
a mo�dm mcw- -M a
- _ ��m
Z n L) — 0a0 po CY, m w�, y.� T'.` ° �n� 3 y `° ° , ri �
QN m > 3 E 0Oaa �r rnQ A = - « a a . -Mm m U`cc din
0 _do- LUS Urm my m U.S .a me U. V
Z 2 o 0 . °ttt °U' .2 ° E c�:.,0 LM_ym tc cm r °ornc
a'F L m 0 16 ° ;ao E 0 QUO _' -.3 m ~ �mc to w ~ -m c ~ -° tg mm
O yy 3 m E d U w t J m N O« V U O C� Mm N -'u N C C- ° m O E
~ M000 °' o :2 ati =ms d =c-mo c£ 5 mmw °3n m0 m'm1012
O E a d w c u w m r N U' m= O ` a �� w m� 2 .c m ` c_ d `m m
m yy "E� m =moo `m , C ° ;°_:0 `m 3�yN�o w �y ° 6w`O 0 ��L°� m5 TO 00
ZO y? `o= O o oU Ti�>U U o U o 1 r. 2 a�� 2 �E°
O c fmE`0
='
. m3 d m Tiv 0- cc
o c o - o a t E m c ° a M O v E N O ny' d am O m? O N E 0_ na N
m O N W L c w 01 0 '.: w 0 C y Ca N M N 9 U > E w m a m N m C - N ' t: 0, 0 2
N C C m U rJWr mt 0 , _. p C>: 0w Z O) mU w «
~ M - ° m c c c d ° o c a K y .� w E wi « E I c a o « c 9'0 « c o'� y a b
am:90 o °v mco� `m pEc €n fovy p lea �ac'c f ° _ daui6
> >-6 cp 5 tma DLOCC Z'o U- I O Cvmm"rn - w0 wy; `°LE C `
N w 0) >CNp >YIUVUI >mN �O41 m 0 0 w W10 N a�w e WO'[ W°c� C_OtN Q
m Ol N j O) m mE NO�'Om BOO QLL 0 VnNU m COL_ Carp -� C
0° O'C c m-`. C e m - S' Az CZ-- C rp p
e S� TC c c:°. a mE co`n m =m o c,� amm°2'= . E`3 av�ct3 m0
O O O- m�°-- m9 m'^ Of W. w'� NU N O13.Q «d °> m� NYI `w ° wa ' m66 'c
W Ol0o9.� O J p 01 ° U`mm Op w`O'� «01 a C'Oaa ma _a wy m L°oEu m i>a
_ m U pY m CU C«0 C e f
f f3�5o d33� ac ° a « adwO adU f2 L u c�A� (�d3 w U'MU)m0mM
y
v
F m c' `w m o a Q o E °u a m o ~ °� m 3 m c t
A t o Y °m �.`oa w'p H - "cu m i
C-, n omA =om p 0°pw mO �occm d Z' H N N °c °
Qu pa ° O N c aOi�QEm =>-Op �� �oc�ymm °�a '
>a a °5m m EjE m a �.'-.. rnE
W E E a of n$ D U U ° c > m d c 1 E E n 0 u w E c
m
u
c _
m N
6 m
O C
U �
O m
O
o
39
M: N
W �
C > m
'C U p U
o¢ UE
f ~
Z
2 m
� a m
a
0
~ na >
w m o
a
O
j mcc °c
WN
WO u'vE wo W
J ._ c
M Qc° mm=
HO
LL m
R' W, a c a y orc c
OW
wZ ° N �� Wj CaL a (Jc2
C m - m D J C U W m y
QQ oa °' �W2M o` co
Q - ' W f m U a m o U
O
d N O U O N N- N O N C N U C O« N U L A N M d
2R' J9 0 o c Z m m: > ° aria c ° c .2 °w� Z>'a oa�t=ncm oar
WO mom3 Jto, m E 2 O c o ya U) m., ; ;,ic -, c v j co --.> 3E w'`L 0L a E i N dmy >d�y_0
OW «0-ac c w c a . -y 3 �
m c m e 2 n` E
NL Cc
aQ mmm c ua in= 3 t m uDJ w y H?:
N/N 0-. m
- p. n9 00 Q o>
_ y U CaC > N mmU dCN
W� Jm u ES
mm ymr m m w �'m C .m – MWO €am ma _m = «RJmD.
GF M O 1 m r m « c – mm o –m o s ca cUmw w ail n ydN yomc ° H i 0E''
E2 a ZZ 00 o Ncm 3 11 C Y1 .. (')a, 0U�Om Ma11 mfnE �w�NLNm OI.V NC ^rT
Qy Uo w- Um Uom «v -c° U°mrn>.m , Uwd w� FEZ mT�aav Za=-6
� F Fwc6 Nccc He - «c .E oL Fmm`° -dctwn ~ NSds 'R EWam °n -0o mzy
O No:'.o ` mE ° Q a HmD me O a y 4 J v v u =U' E W>.0 >� °c yaoamc8o
F - uc 2E m v a._a. « w3 a m ac vl m € > c
00 -m n M M Emm ` M E ai w m L c Owm c b 2
N O C a N U y N E m a j a m J N E C a y D L y y m N S C N C C C O m a O w m o w m c w
'Co O f�a ui 2`- 2 m - c m 2 m o y`- « - °E> f mu c a0- -- ommmmo'a°m
CmcD am c�wac0 co c oo`m– o -wc`N na– ..
H °cmc 0Ot 3 c 2 m J c ui m o'. E g 3 mEa c C c a E9 >m0D pE -e Z – r
am MMEW m- m`'y41 =01NN mddEm-wmaN mCN`� V N �UL' =ryC Z
Wdo� a'u f0 Wrgm�e.rmm WN C m me m` = o �cmam amc amio o'o a3 >t>
E cm - c
a:°N E� -2 «mv.2 m « w�N cr%) mE
em. C c fug- fdwcwoom 2 EmEym fEo..� oE�m �2 L.•y Wmm m
N J C O m J m C m U Q: « m m W E C w �. 0 m 5
0 O: y N KF C C. O C T J C S. �• d n O O' C 'L_ UI Mu c 0 [ct cE c�o'o „m c`o. « ° -c m.mc CEy a2 a u - 0MO 't m x - ° �
mm m._
.a f v m o�c m5� mNUmE�cS myCm «r mZ`c °tn 5 i�o: oc, °d
v o EL aq aco�c�8 ac ° = ovc°' ac ° u >� Rmat"ua :.oEE_my
s L o m L0 ° `cwEa c'�amw a -aoc �mm"ZW:?Zmywam «° P
c '.a w m m'um mo mn_rn'H2d momE2�`o mx� and =m3 \wOJHrmNm`NOwJ
f U dOwc O7 E U' a = 0 o� >'m U a- o� - � 3 m? t7a�a ° �6 C m $a c w mrno
N
5 m
E
E
m
r
9 °
MI c
y N U
E
Q«
c
wE
m
U
m N
6 !?
C
N� U
° O m
D
O
q � J
U3
Cy
m >
d
Q
m C T m
«°
OQ Ua
n F
2
2 m
� a �
C °
Z ° a w
w m" o
a
O m ouJ
j Hcc ycy
111 N C i:l A U m a
o U n O
W O u a E N 9 c
R Z <.s c° y m
HO U Ua
7 H
LL � q
C N N !� N �Y _"O O LIJ O Z 3 N O j
7 ' C m m r N OJ C U O) m N
Q a °a ° 'EK om m o c o
K ll f m C� a m J U
U u�
¢ 3 m
m o
ZK o- ym �rn ° c No Em E °m m cm °m L'" a
F¢mr3 a. c c w Z'yo o n'i£c o'H wc$ 2 ji
tea. a a mud =E u ° c c� — 0 "o
ma =TO a u
W cam_ 2 v Nd Nnof °u c ° ; m 0 0° E c � ° u
u m a c m J y a° m- N J a m a Qa y c o m /LI m ° a
�Q a Em oN N c L,m a�a0O m d m c ° a
pF UNLNo� Lm. °aZ rn3Jm =ro o —c °u ° uooM L) Z Z N L N = U rn a m m 0 0 — N O L a L U J n m, y N
W m N n m 2 m O N U m€ l o- O� V C c� ui y L
Z :E NymVlj N Oa ymmmcm NU me .- U) O
d' F $ G �� N 3 m u U m n m v t a c m m �' $—=, 3 a c
m cx a N': n m F o mmo J
O oaymmam w 0 0a_A � cd 0 . O
8. J c v '0 M Z
f aa;�Em0 a w O1 5 a mcm .0 a ° — O `Oa aa 2 °
Z a . y c mm$a,N ='^m - ° mi0 ' a: - c
O acm Imo - a'93 c a MO my 0> m 8ACa e m
omME. ° mdNy mcyonTi �$�0 93�r n j, o m z
Jmm o = �mrnn aaaoc _n m E
m c 5 J m U> o a' y'm o y s a
G m E E c r 5 O L a N OI c N C = m a N N N C C m O C m 0 9!
N C U O U C m L m o m 6 N C m
d -2 n° 3 m y a a m J J a 'O a
m aL U yL °ILL._ C m Orr
m m xcmu Z rnn o oc L mL a0ma�E �m
f I m o - o J9 c "cE co2LL p c � N mn C m Nr =tNNC G OUm d°y 0NJN > O 0 `° F NCJOa� CN v
° J U m ry N oI m a m o_ v m ti m Ti a 2 - 2 'y � a m 0 4I
LM oA�E�v p oi ° cv °$mg m a c ema= wcEnio o
f am n J C�EE uc °oc 7�$ma ai ° m �� mmE�cm clam
R
y
A
1 E
� S
c D
E °
o"
m
'> n
w E
m
u
m N
6 �?
E C
Ul
`O
o 0
M
w f0
D) m m
c _
c v
O U O U
O m d m
o¢ U E U w
� F H
Z
2 m
� a
3 o S
~ as > >
Z
W
I
IL
-i m € m €
j H c c y d O d
wN 0A_ U a 0a
o = m m
W O U O E a
a .Z Qc0 °
_ Nm
DO _U m - (D
LL rn m
0: m •,-- c
O W C N N U N U
C --
LL Z
Q � Q • C L QIm C C
KQ fa jma 9a
w o 0
a
a m
F v = m
Q am a ymTi 0. 2 mo cd co 0-
J�i J L N d m m o N y N
C m C d d d LL •_ O- =a L m J a d f6
O� 9 acZ oa c v U `.a 0 - =y•-m
R a wU)yyan m- Ct ooZy�dm�nya
d r J N =� c O d a d' d Z y O.m a y y y a o t N E
Z f N > Z d U C m C m d Ld r 0 C' C
Z Z 0 C = N x `- m d= .O -0 y - C
Q a - E U O- -- N d v= 10 E m = s m 2 -, ' m o n o
fn yn xTN N C .m. maL =mOI
ZW m0 U3 n�0 Qa 9 d$U w Nw r 'n Q d n'vc
MW , 0 2 � �r m y E � d m O N w_ - N OI V U m� 0
o o m a `0 Ely y r a m A o� r c m c n� x O t y y m m
0 m an «YN N m m O.- 0..: Cy
r J c p m N E c a e N m � d - ._ L o N > d
Z m y O d d 41 m J a d^ H« 41 m y H 01 O m V O m E>
O m c x= c- Q J o o L r r c J E m m
F.. Nm�vE a � Q co dr °r NO�m =r - cmm ry
Q N m Or N. O E m? yy m d V N 0 r L 2E t y y = L O= O
N o O d d mw y m d C 7U N d L d J d m .�-, C a d C
F_ Z Nm'C �. Q y jC2 L dL
N m d L 9 `) LL Z.r C «.2 C a y m O T 3 W O 8. 2 L m
C m m m U a d m y m m E d y y L n d C d 3 m- 0n.m
a f O€ a U OO N U > g a E v f 3 d a .__ x„ d d a H
a w N U u 2 c C u S x m m = N y 'a-j 0� o o
d O d t y (/1 `y N* to N W « N N d j 0 >> W O u m
f fn�NQ� >a 3?��w f�ananN m o as n1
'3 m
t a 3
U E
L U Z d 0.0 F
> m 6
a O U C d U
N N 6 y S n O y
d c
O {p U N U 0 d N U
> a a 0 a 0 0
0 0 0 0 m m
w E E n U a m `O a w n
u
W
A w
n
EO C
N U y
O O A
C 0
O 0
u5
w N_
Q m
ami >
Q
C T
O m N N
Q C N O N O N
9 c rn U d U E U E
w 0 r r r
z
= m
a
w T n n
c o 0 0
z 0 v > a
w
I
IL
O
w 0 od o 0 0 - ° a oo€
.�.. C NN o,o m._ w N m U U C m
w N p N q 0 0- C O >> c c v n 0 m 0 C rn rn
w0 uoE °> u m�c0 Jmayu ,
H _z - 0 0 0 0 Ur m
LL ~
Q . � 01,,, c c o c w
Ow ° mom a3 _ =y
I z $u rni O1 m ° °U
Z .0 R c m OI C N a J c
o m N
� W f a o D o a 0.
a d)
T
Q m l0 _
J F y C 0 C N 0 a 3 U N O y C '1 w N y a O d
Z
Q J N m « ". ` .J « J= bQ m O 10 C- I m M a m 9 C 2 fl y 41 a
r U N a> C a 0- O - O m O Q N .(J. y O_ a O- w y . 0" J m
0 ' a w M~ T y U y 0 a O W a 8' a C O Y N a M C a N d p UI O y J N 3 � m
C
W f a m E d m c-JO a a v r rn a a o M ,
; F o m m v 10 w r m �+ m a o y o t y
o �Q
02— M o� ° c oawc_ > c°�m`c!^$MM >L V a cS °c °otuaJE�` mQ =°.�a�
�H yln >6a Uya O _j OYW,�m MMO w ° fON m«
ZZ Q Q O S
l C J N _ O VI C e ,= U O 0° w E E m O J YI N N C m� C� U- 0 U M 5, 0
I L_
y NmmfO N' �wo 'c °w- �OdSEry mm u J m¢ w 0 co3
z ooru`()al�vaa J ��c m a m « c.4 U Tjp 7�mN� ��SE��r �mudmc�c
KF N'm" -O GdNCNlO NE N Oa N'00CN CU I ON m �. m M2 0w rUL J «`DINE
O m 0 L . O'O m m m V w C L= a' E 01 m N a m L O a C r O N O C 6
ac a`Im € me oe m.� p a cr0 „o ma¢ mo
Z ° c ya
o =n 3°'m.12 JO 8UO a g a- a w
ml M ymv
f mm R o 0 r_ J c �mdy rn�A� o'� oo E w n£ o >g, a c r, m - ° dm2w () .2V�m
z m` o�w c.cm3 Egon c 0w a 3 mr' ^ -m °>`° m ° mmm?a �, m �' oov i°c
J O N C
c 0 c min ...>m M mL C.� rnm. - - c 0 u�
0 QwM8 0 Om _MMW'M :: °00v � Q`- lOJ c�ci�u.c .`
r L o u o? a .� m o m a �'c w ici w o m m m 1' w a vE U Q y °c v d o o E E -� c N
Q 00 ' o o ._ w
N aUn - ° a'r rwtL maN =OmMr ma NY wO mMCMmO°IQ n
0 m m1G m m m to o._ mm I+I mu m > o 0 MMC z
MrN o£aac �vom M J w `o wu a nm oyami �� ei �jAC da 00 a Tr >�
m`E cm�aNd `u�,m�T g nw �� d rnm`E3mo�O J Omv�m
w w J q « r( '6 j J . 0 - 2 - 6 w N U m « L... m M m m w N t O U 6 w N� C y U a Z E p �
M N� Q a a m M U C E O A t> O U C L a L- J U m w O U m O a- N W 2 C t' C U C 6
f f= >.cm�E ° U�a f om ° fnwmrwo3�� - ° a w f�am }e}11 n y E y1 om
O O { ry w ] a E ._n O C C 'w ryQ C U C_ ° m a C 6 C m L C l0 O a 0 y C a y w � y w� a C y C is A E
R N` N O C a U C m r` ( 9� T C C r C 6 O C T C U 6 a q C Z` Z ` a E ppp m ppp C U a U
Ol OIO N>N�C� L_ O1L .= U�:: fOVCaON OI Cw0 O= CO 0 0 0 tN
a d 3 f n m m U Z a m E a d m m m m a f p u a d 3 d 0 0 m F m N m ° m m
w
y m v m
w 'o a E H t m ui m
a o r y>. J
M c
8
J o E c o D
w 1°n CioEu ol' 1'+am 1 pw
E m T rywry O w y M a J w
q 0
12 w m 00 = J N J 0 A 0 a 3 o J m p
dc
WE 0 E ° um���mdt Ea °uxd�m`
u
m N
6 !?
OS
U -m
O
O
u9
W W
m
C
m m m
'C V p V 1 O V
0 UE OF OF
Z
S d
� a
y n n a
c o 0 0
R
>
o m d v
as > > >
m p c o
a
c `ow _ c o
j H c c o€ `o o m `o_ N m m n o O o y o
WN F «m o� ��>;��a °yin ��m' >�d °y'c°n
WO 2 .2a
�aE � of €� C� 'u yw�cu�mNnu J u
7Z acv � 2 ma 0¢ 0 J'yo ma 0¢ 0 E'oo
�O - - 8r
�F
LL m O C O C
�tl! O V C- a
OW .0 .. m m m
LL Z E N U U U N U N
OTC OIC
K f �� �
CL
❑ ❑ `o Cl o`
S 0? Q N
d m O — N d d
Z_K oy 0Hmt a c �t��m H ~o` = ;�>, o' ° d °a 6a a
W as 3�aaimcoEr d�ui� ca E o, a 0D'c0O°��d 3 ~mo
0d 0 �a °c o'm?rnc m oc wU�mc E� oo$ m d m o 03 Eaim_`m 0 v -��
m _m > - m �$ m x- _^ g g d m o m y a d T m m E n 'o `� x c
CL
6 Q yy
CL 8S W O O L y R C Y >i d C N d r Z J N d o C O O J U C r a 6 N O m" L a n O m e d
C3 F- Q O C O C O m d a d m L C L t m m T C N m> L m d m L !tpp d .~ r r d >
- a N S c m m_
ZZ L_m -'�c mm:?15 Tio ¢ ° d^�a Y?M aJy Cmmo uo - - m
O y
3 " : 0 a a c cE me �9qc €o 0 oZg "g ..L moEan nmA$�
d w d A m m a C
Z W - rn r = m m A¢ m E c> ?? d o v E c d c m a E a
r d m c O c m m o a m
LLrf >¢m cvi -c O 0 m -c O mo - cco 2' E
O _ a w o m E o E a m=°°- 3 0 E F v n m m m N m o 0 0 0 o 1 d o E o 6
~ 3 E Ecom o'omw mr NN mw " . ma £'r a — °o_DQ wo'm n o E m y -
O m y y d J d° U r/ O ` C a y m O m 6 w y N C d r o y d �'� O 'p�
O O.2 N "•' C ONY m 'Ei NUaOU.m. = y 0 L6 >m OmOm.m =NaC 6
ryN COCU O tDw 0 O —Z O >yw0 €�d0
Z H m o 0 =� '> E j u �' y ° I��' a C D N C v U p y a L a y =O0 c N m n c 33 g V m t
O 0 c A a y a t y $' a o y m o m o = c t'e `° c m e umi- m m c m `° n E
H UE °L m'° ym - v U. o min �'un c ° r a�g d._ cEa cEm0om r
Q wi mmo �aaiKd -53 mr a -`o_m N p y Ti$�dmo`ym6 o m
mcr''°E d`m m of o.Eft a - i 'o @- rn'C L2oo i
H an d $mom 3 o c m - $ U c a c J d iN a > m 2 c n w v r H d
N� rin y = . 3 oc�JC ri3c m JyO��maom ai�o m c L`a
_ mdd.,
0 a m UaJ �c °a m mo m Op 0 O. =° ° �:?�Ctt S
i m A c Q m m =° " m t m m m Yi� ?amt °m E m m y 3 m d c =� c a m o'3 Q m E c m 33
.0 f f aJ3 fw ( Q3x�d� f�='ac � -wEat 2 Cum v o o ocmrn °�oaiU°- Aoa.Am000dm m fro 9
F m a., cac L,cm d'«
c « « °a0E co w o M 'd '� ° cLU J� m a m 2 0�m`-cm =' ° mac - vE occ °mr �.
< a m > y m.c- 0 a £ .c rn d m 3 U z o a m c E a o cc o W o a y °c ° c o m y a E° 0
d r r m m 01 1` m L ..L-.. °' ' 2 mQ U C O d y '+ N� N U O E� m == L 2 O? O. C Q L C 0
f fz as mmr Em3 2 2 a S:E mm mme�: fvn��odnm3°wnn mE anH mmo
N
T c T
d p— V a m j c m m q
F m N m O °
0 ~
m >J - m a , c mJ m S
a nS � Yv_aL
J 0,2 th a U m 0 0 U
C r d J C O C m j m m ° m N m a T
O° U m '+ m 0 U m . N m t t M C C_ y m U m C m m
:m ma ss ma ��. >>c av Evm a°n�a o'
W E E a c H U S'w z a D E n v o d E a 3 a
m
A N
c?
o =
O Q Q
C.
O �
'C N
Q Q
N ,
Q
C T m N
y 'c m rn �jE UE
Z
� a
N a o
~ ad > i
Z
W m O O
f
IL
-j ro � CC
W H C C O O t
> $a
W 'cam °°'a 00 ow O o v E °` c
C QC =� =2
Z U m m
LL
LL' c y c N
c y :2 Y U V
O W - J W J d
LLZ «o. CO CO
Q � Q Z 'cm me rn�
aQ f �a a
K o 0
rn
a �
a v d o w
m
I C3 W
0 3 = a am
E
c
m a
Q auoo a aNm0> 3 f E??o ESd ° Mao N cv - ar m LNO-
U L 9 N U r
ZZ �' m 0 O O L °
O r
QN nc'caOC acarnrn
Z W OT N NQLJO)J
O E y E N a O 0" O f9 O)
O OO �°, O >�a T_
f am m 75 . r, p a
Z N N C o n N .. — E y
O O J. % " O
L (C(pp 0= p N O
Z J U C 3 V J E d 6 N
Q L_ LO ;Ny
am-
0 0
C7 CL) i im �o �r 0 E i
D m m m N r J W
M � :c O o wi N M0 5
� M v od
m
m y Z E O'O - nL " a m
J JN2` m<c Jvom °cc
m m m E a p � d y y a 9 y
2 y UL O. N
0 oao °Em c°E'u o?
° Z m W m m
o=
a y _
e u fw d m f aimn� w
'.sue d
L
d d N ( y O d N ry ` L " 0 02 y
C L r C v 9 C U U L N ° ( N L r C L r ° 9 O 'O « N ° d
C d �ON y CdSLd �` � NONAp3C= ..d- 7i �',.O --.OW V " 0 0 ` ¢ N yN a 2 `o
o f€ r v m_ N m_ o y r c c ` (z j o
TOOmr °mac °cmma,°rN ` O"`mE�o a ..-, -. - ( J (pp C V._N'odtNc
e N d C C 'p N_ N N Y1 rl N E y C` N N j N m C C l0 N O N W l0 " J U m C y C N N j 0
OD /IO _C - _N 9 ONC UO9 N' . N .ftNJJ UON Na g t52
C a J a° ° J L N L ° ` ° O O C n N N
a 0 L N° p J L N 2 L 0° L L O O vl C a m 0 N L' O
WE a E n3 mama a�°Om`° o O' a N EE N 2' o o N E a3 NamaaacaNOONmEENEoo
C « > C « E T
o N C C L W m y m (0 7 N U C L N
A_ c c m c « U y« m a d c v c >« U d m Y, 2 c
o,m dm nm O °, 8- 1515 «mErn° 20a aomo5 «�E mo
O.E -mpm mm£ m o.L 0L,m � y c mO mmL dnt 0c m�mc
°- .� U 30 E= E -O- 3 U 3D E= a E.,o
21 o «Ecc`mmoy" ='_ °ny o «Ec�'L =
O 0 =m W o o= o�n c a m y y m �, 5 0 0= c to c a U c w v m L C ° O O ._ m m m .. C L y A O 't jp O° N E y r C ` L, yl
c m m U o o m c E° o m m `o E m m U o o 0 c> W o o m m a E
0 3 y o m N o `� n o E E d o m C o 3m > o E
C(n nn.- c._m'��com>Dm nn'n`OCy��amomn
Z p c - m o O m n
m E ° u2c - y� u n o.EE ER2 C n nEE
ovl .;10 m E" . .; ` E''
C y o m v ° m
U ` W L O V ry d L O V
'c W 'o D E � pc 'o D E
fa Uin Uin
z
S m
F - a 'y o'er 'NO�5
3 C " -oaE ° A Q �m
c m c m
W ma > m mm =F- a0 0 m —
2 a: 0 DUtAUO 0U(nUo
IL
O
' C C ° ° T C C C
W N C :• A C O Qi d L O OI
O 4on cmEm` -°o. m,3_EOma
O u'a E
Z Q C O N m y° H m N m ytn
�z —v - a `o= - C L
Q O
LL
Q
0 X W,
c c
c y o 0
rn
O W my
LL z p d c 5=
z
Q S00- 0 c o p o
W U U
� o
Q CD
c M
I ° O m m °. m p V (O m N L m
K m m 'uE =m my t5 .0- c>m�omm a
y> L E m m o. y - o y U m r °� 10
o =Ea; aimmnmc �E
OW - - '''ncmomy EymO°�a«mmcE
O «m -_ �EmL, -U LEArny.c Etifno
Lu �:2 �o «oom3a � y`'v o _o
Q a E o c y ,c m.� m N« =, u U o r E E 3 y=
m = M O o: U�6 rmmcoom =c0om
Zz :! «�Em Em = m �,j - M UU mF-m as
Qy °- 'rnEnma « LUE dctup� = >
z S E t aUD °c« c>'rn> m o O wy u.o
LL,r n= E m c m,�mL°, °�'m 0 ca
O con o cEa 0 - m- , - Ea0i .'
z o mm0 °m moVJ um '��° OyOr= 0E
O m m o U y U0, E, c y.5 _rn `o - m o m s« y nw
n m 3u> ymm..u .
E:! -.mac gi' CL apwc >ma «mom m
0 ,y �m �tnO Om ~mo= ya 2a0c 3 u aui om
L m9'a c a rc as Nnm ac?m>.
Q ~ r L y m E U°« m (V N m m O= m n n Y! C O
n y a u c c t a@ v vi m r E '- r c E y z
m .- mm'? = o 350Ern ym = c K S c.. ° mca�i v
u TE
a f 10 75.L)
d v 0 ° p E c E a t 'r.° ° z E
v o o f ai E c E° m o t o m t m m m L o o « ; m
`c m° > >ntm =d mO >' E r
¢ a of o _aEamm L' rn tvacE ° c m,5 om E
�' f E W «m cc faQEO « ° c of «UE w
Q u m
I y
m m y m m m IN C U
5 c roo a o . o,Z 0Ooma ~oo`E« 0 3oy`uUmnnc- °
01 m °O wwm «.�c mm o owa t�c ro,yom c'rom c or 0- C(L u
CY L 17 C . O ° �yN TO� � 00J " E 2 .2 LL.c y" �0
Q O S V O m > O t n >.m m m L C m O u L m L 6 T m m N� C m S LlI m K m 0 !E c c o 'a mm>=ommmw =p mmtn mc°+� na v m > °omm o+ww rnommE�
wE F- Em- -°Etnw >EEmd'm=o'yo Em.. u� E�n� >ES m'm=o'�o3 «QN
E jk {� E -0
! -
| §!| �;
�m a !7r § ,� §j$
k! \#r @ -
# \ )!ƒ 3!2
f E2
§1!!]
0 ) }�k
I-. }i >o >U
k
§ 2_ {\t}
)2 k §�§kk
M z ` o .,
[®
§B 00
)§
0 I o
IL
§\ ) §m. \)! !
°» ® ; Lm §.>
§) - )$$\} \�f #§
k\ `#i\ §$\« {i)
2® / tI�2E! �)§
!!m § !a!
0� k) ;£/ \7! ! ;7
# ,- a o
z \- - <2Ew) 3:
q kf« ƒ!{ a-
" « !!g
g co ) : -SwoM+ !.!
§ | {- -E �`0 )
- . 'a 0 0
- )
M W !f(cEkZ0 ))§
Ea . 0 0 a§ ,
§k!!J{« , !
!t( 7E E 0EZ t
!#
�! !| § ;! ! $ , Q !
# k {t / / ;( \� \k{\\ \j )ammLd2 -
| a !«Qe;lQl±fz ® )!®\f & @`�$ }
§® �a!§e;l ®!!! °s « ®! » :«! -» ),
® k ;)(:2 p !!_ ;l "pU.LA- Q§ «*�! #!ra■
I£ !E- ■,oaE:E am ;l ;e,Er[!rBl;,2EE!!l ;;o
m O N O m O N O m
«
L «
a N
m N J
W-2 O
O L C^ O L m C^
ER 3 0 E m° 5 3 d w
a� m E m c E w E E ;.p E
O E� c c J E m c c J
J
o N F -= a m o H o 16 a m 0
- = J O N« y O O m .m. «
m o m m m o
> �a E° �.c E°
m m
cu o °o� y °` °�
Q o. >U y f 2U
o o E
Z
2 m _ 4; -
Z a >o >UE io >VE
W m p0K H pUO: F
a
0
�•q q m'n p oK w m'a o oK N
Q W N o c N' - °m v�coc
m
Z Q c V = d U
n 3 t0 0 = a o. � ( E
�
�0
LL ~
a. W c c
p o
ow C N S
LL Z p d C c C J
Z
a
cl Cl 0 a o o
U U
a r
m9 �'m m
C n - a u a 4 JU u
mrm c� c p c m am c� c p c m 0•
RW cc t O > O o�o'm �NCVTa cm `
OW K m�!L+a O m UUNCa �m
as m> >mc °_ Er i - ° c as t3ta �v E m i o ° « ayy o c oa
W �L ° O o r m m m Q>> � m p c F a- c r N m m o >> S m p c
a. d• `U >.E firma P O 'c �'.E �'; 3 m.. �>.ma �° °'�nr 3m
Q ° m m a m a a M �; a m m N N m o N a c a s !� c ; a m m N m
ZZ 0 oa o'm 'c c- - «« nK 0 'c ' ;m oao m'ccE. -m:` «M
QN a ° d O -5r mom �E di. «m ° -a c y 03iO a - SrmE 0 L
ZW L•E a o` %R 0 , a 03: .e E m C m3 `m . .e E m
m
10 crn ;m: cyvs m L � 'm m ` c cram; m«cyaa mF
2 c m>.am 0 mm «C C _ Jm °•. mUcui m momm«c o Jm M
CH J o a mw 3mo ymoyooa >. °O ;5 uT oc'" d,Y•Ed 3s cL'
Udomaa ar cr �`-°d °u ca'o J�cm ar m'u
Z aaoo v E a c i c m�U c'ic cya °mm�`a °-t om Emo 0J5mo0.5-
cic cya
L'n?�m,v mEmoc «m9 EE moa 'mmEcm a m> EE co
Z jjgmcmm do «�$ E Nr- mw rn mp'L�0 -,- om'
O m o t y'c « E x a m m.- >° c Ti m o N `� m 0 a « E x a m A - > °' c u a
of a -0�o
l°m o'ac NmmKm o«10dm
U-' A m - 3 mm rn«a E'er ui �- m- LL am m c
o v «�EEo.�aLy m,:° rc�U' mca y.-:g EEora «H `m z
r via d « « = . co -- ame m0 >." L' m °o `° °mc 5_
C 2 L C LL O J N C C L m o« V M C C M L q �- = O J N C C L m N« U F
`•'� > =-z 3: m a ta c 4 �mE. J nc ° uac `Lo°a am °o EmEoic mac �
Z N N m t N am > m- O L C d N m N m a 2. 0 U m > m E U L C d N 2 m N 0
m mU m m ,nm--m nQ� >jN m m a °oa mma a <O >j0
c °- f f 3�w�c 0 oa m,p n f co' @' �o °� °cyE '^�' a O5 2
m c c a CJdm NL a"am ->. �._ m5m cmwm ;aa L`n�am
c •a° ac 'o a�C�ti Etim °rvE9 o o «md a `m w`Sa -
m • E`mm'ov mami�acc am arA >mo � « ' a °cc tdmcL a n F m >mo 3
f « rE «2�EEa o« 0.23 fU §oo °mo FErw3E: =go« U.�'3
9 m
o
L a � _ gym..
u Tm LL a.
q c5 m r:°.o ao N„. 'n ci l^0o0 >�o z.
m m n c m o a m N ° �, 't `c m 3'm
O O U V O m d f m o O U m >` U m °` an d N O
m m >.o Ea u� mm'? EE m
`�: O or
�a aomm°-
xUw °o aa a o�y « -.010 o a J.a
W E Ea «U!_^m�No`�oo EarN30 a « «Nam'��
d O N O d
U C L L «
c_ a. m 0
A 'a 75 jp m w O
O L
E" m�wd' -°•�
N U C c d E 9 m
d e E d E
° ° o Esc -`;�
o» m E a d p
J o d«
jp Or g d. ._T.
u9 d:. -d.
0y Em J
¢ > d 6
�� E°
rn C T O d F d d
2 O U O V
$W 0m y.d
2 U d H r
N Z
2 d
3 a d` `o d
d
N> a °O 0
z na 000 E >
W m no H
a c
W 7 O m y m d m N
> . c m d a c 3 c o w 0 y o m E o
�N O 4 c 0 2 c U `0
3- O' N
Ix aC U a Z �+ >
U0
�O
OF
LL m c
0 w
ac c o y
O W c m'F I m 2
LLZ 00 c 2
2 J
�Q ct Oc �co
m W a U `o
LL'
f a ? ui Ord v � °- °- mAY E
d U U U J m
'O c c U C d U J L d d 4.
ZK wm.5« o� d d ° 30M wa X20 2 2ui ' T�
HQ L d �^EaE mc"� d, E dm« w ins ct
KO �E d E ma m gj'mu NCdam Sd w o> a o_ mYadc d0« ON
y Q r ° «�mm E m« 0 0a u 0d N 2a 0> NO coo
r3LaE0 0 - y « m > 0yc as a.o m ma m v c
W< �S3m= o rT dn o M - ME 3m N a me dr °�� :??°
Q 6 o m a c a a d C 3 m m d m N d m m £ « I « u G ° J m c m
O 0: E ; d O 0'm'c c E w d �° « S £ E a a d c« w a a ° dui
2 Z r c= N a c d > d o 0 u d d v d � d d m ` > d a c
QQ °w «�m o�` mc'�yv od Ym J�or J Ju N €m gicy �'S'�E
3 a y c E v m o D o
0 c o d
d c o o a
- y c
O W J d« c C 6 d C C - O :.. d F d C r - d d E d d an d d p U C
RH d 3 0 Vi U' d E ° c 0 c`o E- tw s` ta Ed mmc�
N y.. ma-, 3- d d L=
O J0 ?,. ?._ c ya c C Z` N d a N� N— N J N J N c
F_ c�o ac N�cLdJ!oy o'u Nod '
J a T iy co J � a d
am pd E d�00 uc cca 0 —�6 ` � �" u_n °wra c
O rn�EcA yv m�«G�d EE 0wo dT..m 'ate 'an ado ao - m y E�d
dodnmo E>o� c ca dd d °'o a Uz`o m L° mam m a-.wc `o c Eo E
Z �w °��rn �n£� d -E ; 4m d dt >` d� d d ` dr -'z.Em E« m
O d d d U d :.: E lC >° Yi ' c L .L.. d L L .F L o r(. J 3
N d> «.- �ad�'3._Ty O cJ F ma F o Fy r m '�dd - u ° i Ed
N {p d `m E .n d d K o v c c T c
0 �.v - U'mcv L LL EEo- a L J a`�E. ' ° c a n ��i , t m 0 E �' i
r r m0 Z' _T Ty mLE d�c o ° ••0 :20 9-500 92 OR9 m 2J «mdm m-
0 �da a t20 Ow 0E c... �UrE 2d @ 0cc mm°o � 2
> >a oU n a ,E a s dmEwc mac may. - 'a Jj Jd J52 =m J'ncw m
O d > d E t) L c d N 0 d N Lm m C C T N N N d C 0, m N .5 �
d d N 9 p O a d d N d ^' d 6 Q % > Tj N d J d d m d a d« U d N C d> d d
�d�d ;va 0 n�nm a>. �' m - 6 f 0 f m c Ccd�
°- a(7 ymmm m��rn.L -y E!?d�L ° -wpm a a ° rn - ° � > >w� E pmt
m dAcd3' wrJnucm` =m E:E cnc d OE rna d worm d r ny ad oy
m od «�'co tdm a
P E d F - '° >dJO -'m ..o aA �d ° c Tor ca r Nt a°� f
m fU3 o °du FE..w Zi E::a o« 5_ Z(n Eco f Sm Em ' (5 0oa fd..m
N
V N p
U T y U - d d
_ L 0 T� d� E N J.A F
a N 4 0 0 0
~ a a C O d m O d O •• U OA « U O
C t4 'YC m0 O6N CN O".0 U Om
m r C O d y N d ° N m .2o C
E 0 W d d d Vi U
C-, t+� O O � V...L c d� > O
OU Yy...O daF ddO U y�yy Cd
d d d V T O d E a �_ N d din O 5,6 �a a °mm. 0a 0. �' 'o °. `o nmda
WE E8._U!P W�0- E0 z E0 m5 dro0
m
u
c _
_A M
6!?
O S
U -
o m
o �
_ J
. 0 'S
c h
m m
c
- u o
m
OQ 0
Z
S m
a m
3 c n
c o
2 na >
W a
a �
r m
W m U o € c a° r
> . !!
C C O m N 5 m
W n tmj O
N c . N m d O� L a c c
Q ° u ' C m� a 2 N N (p Q
ma
J
WZ Q �E ° N�' Qcr E_�
- '^ U''� -, aa, o
HO m dm
LL Q ~
Ir X mad me
c q d y 0 9 u V O O c 0
O Z LU p m t y 0 2 L O
Q Z TTl nU NU n2 0 4l2>
KQ 0a � ¢y`�o ym
W N3aoJ`o u au
K
Q
Q c m $ o y
a m a O` m
Z Q '^ o w a c m y E A N ? a s 1 Z o c d
m - c m c z o cQ a
K C7 a L` a m a u N m m c m u E E m N w m m m E
p� m U c w C m _+ w - ,& Ti c m °- m ° Eva c m m m m e -- a E
CL Q J m a O o m c a m m? A c >` m �_ c L L a H H A c w
W E m 'S L 'a o c m m c E-° om c amo yc m `o 'D
�H ° o m o a w i �':: myy ymx 9c > mat ac o c mEamv
ZZ Z nc a c y 2 mm c-.m m:5Qhi -b m c wo g mo ,nm
m U N m N
Q Q 2 a'= J O a y Ot N N may n C 0° O' m_ O d w m e
W p .. L C m .. �? N y 0 V L y N C $T N C N '- C m O m u c w N« J J J
aim �y as ydc c6�cu " "m8i � y Nay `wo w a ca um E
c m- aaim
« 4 ._ m m m c c LL v m a$ m E L c'« m m« 3
F m� O m 10 mLa rJ ° �' y a. N L m U m N y U
n O n N C N m U a c E U O C` ai a m .` C m m n m m m
Z m n e c c m n 3 c c MM 00
w a m Q m
S` � wr ° °�m�co w u 4$y$cm1 yEw o,� ° y: m n n m -yam
Z m a $ 6 m J J ._ j m u t >. a y h .O Y' m > a_ «'C N c U m n w u^f 'm r L 0 o m m :_
O no m m w' OU ca"w m , m �,y uywEo ° >D-.- or w n° tm�'c HA
F Q C m O UI � m L O O C W m y m m m m m m n m L U N m m c C A L Ql w m E 0� L
E c O m U n m N 3 m a -. m c E- _ m J m 2- 2 0 m W (A c c 0 a n 0 ry
OJr 7U N mO y�2 C mmm m- a =ym ° 0 CN41mc Ua Q Cm n «Om O° Z
aia E'c n mc AOR E nam caul L.'w 4= !emo m J c o._E�va fi
ya c °c a =m 0cV p , Em Q 0a -Z 3Euoy6
c m d° m� E Aa- ° ° co�000�a n Evdd.a g'�N cc N' -'m - 2mnm 1 5 ji
°- f fac c3 va ° aE _m J 'u U � J- Oaayyv a ow m ° s o.. c,o mm�n�nactw 2
c cm a Z` � a m wu JC> 1E acwww QNL"Ow�ccmd >Z`y - m
c a a ° °w ap m9N mJ r mm� mx0 Em .�mm'>m myc
c m mm mC E Uo(na «Ow fnFm�na n N o�mp�u nw a._E EwO mavaym S
:W Wa Fa a` ma a m crnt ._ x cE c o ncQ NCt «" �
f So. �a N cimmm Jd m
h
'9
w
o-
oaQ0 yw F
a uc m >.Uc 8
N _
N c-, mam�E
U
Q U U 2 m (` UI m U c m
m U U m
'>a ac acwnEin�
W E EQ o m.=_ m n F 0 m
J y
6 !2
O. S
N U 1
° O y
C
O w
u5
C
¢ d
d �
M d O O
N O
m O d a U E
N 0 r
z
= d
3 C n
c 3
z na >
w d
m o
a
O r d
LU J d € c a o,
d O -
WN C"- °c �m
0 O O T
0 d n m 0 a 2 y d m n
W O u'oE m�v QcrE
K Z a C° O'S ... c.a '- o
F O - U - m d y o
U�
LL Q a 0 rn 2
a' X C m v D o �� ' ° y n° w
LL Z
Z Cy v aMcc nNn9Ni
Q Q O L ? �` U a Q c d °
o c
CL
K y m a c o u a d
Q
Q
o
2 O aA
F 0 Cd� - Ol y yL d
y 1I _ -
2R' >�o�L' d$cy$g'am�a c E m . :C t d V d
�Q °�:..m `ai 'o �OE -Ei a - O ' E
d 0 �� '=dd "
0 O a u m o m y v m d � w a d a E a= ° d °' m y 0 d $a 0 :5 d
O� c�Edia nwwZudim0O.zoa d0,m0 u =..a aEm v`omm
C Q d d O C d y y y 3 O C 1/i d 2 d O V L L 0 d d L41 a C d
K� v ° o o�m ad£o mtr °a E- gm o o v>.c 'oocE
O F ° a t0 y a« w =- 0- c a C — ' R o c 0 0 u y_� m Q � a d E ° c
ZZ Ti E Td °>. dm:°a €dre u o0 0 Aro- d d =md
QQ yL'orm °w ma,2q"S�my��??�3> g'rn0a� wLC ° d ?cm n5.°° '
W x. ZS y $ w °d of na EE°c�a yac rnm- o m = O no rn�ar
O~ on «o@= miO '�OrvyEv';n Edmm3 do "' 0 f2 C°
d 3 y d ow y y � E� 0 o a c 3 c s o m a E� F c gy m 6 0
Z 'T - io`oa r E M' 8 r _°m d- y v
y C d F d 'O L L .. T N Z' O- n y0 E d C° N N .d_. C U y a y E 12 y 0
f cy6 ��O r� aEw c'> c a ° c E�wI? 1 y pa -°+ , mcn
p - E, 2 1 ' nZ T ° C 5t0ywn�mta ymonoo �mro rn°op a j o c�
F > $ovaLdddn�o �'°m m °n °c o ay c > ya m
Q dry =�o'0 '60 M> w ° E Ti `O m=- _C_OL N
V d d d O i N O C C L> u- O 0 d 2 C= l` J °'° y Z
F u0�°L^taa Ea6,085 E w O � p 2` o E '' Cs°c nwL ° c E0Oa> �0Ed 5
C N C d -6 C N d d N O A N o E v" m m o da o o y L w t C
o t0 .
O L d. y u c `m O C { a E d d u d a `• c m 'u 3 E a d d o C �
10 N C E° C C y d d d U Ol y `O y d O d 3 ° N y d o j 0 T. y
d T C y 103` L d> °L -
d d O O
E E
> U J d N d d m H C C d °. y 'O O . d 3 0 w d 0 3
m c dET =a�g AL'ooyy n'dacy of ww 3 GUdbN S
01 L ° d U a'u� M > ac =i.c ° �dc °� a
a ru2m d,`o_ > ° �rx� ¢O dt d a wvv' - a a�io> ° m
y 5 w r a b' > CJ > O V 0 'O r d 6 t0 6 y 6 t� d 2 d d R) C V 2? T E d n
0
y
r
(9 O
C
d U
E
o"
d
> a
w E