Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout051110 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 11, 2010 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:15 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council /Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section: 1) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property owned by Madison Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, which is commonly known as 27135 Madison Avenue, Temecula, and is identified as Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number 910 - 262 -006. Meeting with City negotiators, Greg Butler and Amer Attar, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price and terms.. City negotiators may negotiate with the property owner Madison Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. 2) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property owned by Basics Etc. Corporation, which is comrrionly known as 41375 McCabe Court, Temecula, and is identified as Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number 910- 262 -008. Meeting with City negotiators,' Greg Butler and Amer Attar, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price and terms. City negotiators may negotiate with the property owner Basics Etc: Corporation. 3) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and City related entities based on existing facts and circumstances. With respect to such matter, the City Council will also meet pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) to decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 10 -09 Resolution: 10 -33 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Temecula Valley Children's Chorus Invocation: Pastor Gary Nelson of Calvary Chapel of Temecula Flag Salute: Council Member Washington ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS Mental Health Month Proclamation National Public Works Week Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five minute (5) time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adootion Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of April 27, 2010. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010. 5 Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Special Tax Administration Services RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with NBS for an annual amount not to exceed $55,219.23 for Fiscal Year 2010 -11 for special tax administration for the City's Community Facilities Districts and Assessment District. 6 Agreement for Weed Abatement Services with Inland Empire Property Services Inc. 7 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve an Annual Agreement with Inland Empire Property Services Inc. to provide Weed Abatement Services for Fiscal Year 2009 -10 in the amount of $40,000. rtrveiaiue wunw riuuu �..unuui — rar Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 3 RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION MADE ON PARCEL MAP NO. 33545 FOR FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENTS 7.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TWO QUITCLAIM DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFCBWCD) TWO DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR THE TEMECULA CREEK CHANNEL, STAGE 2 (PARCEL MAP NO. 33545) Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting for additional Engineering and Landscape Architecture Design Services associated with the Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification — Proiect No. PW06 -15 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting in an amount not to exceed $8,500 to provide additional engineering and landscape architecture design services for Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification — Project No. PW06 -15. 9 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Proiect FY 2009 -10, Temeku Hills and a portion of Chardonnay Hills — Proiect No. PW 10 -01 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009- 10, Temeku Hills and a portion of Chardonnay Hills — Project No. PW 10 -01. 10 Temecula Valley Reality Race. a Fundraiser Event for Michelle's Place (at the request of Council Member Washington) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve in concept the Temecula Valley Reality Race, a fundraiser event for Michelle's Place, at Council Member Washington's Request; 10.2 Authorize the City to co- sponsor the event and authorize staff to work out the details with the promoter; 10.3 Approve the use of the Temecula Community Theater to launch the event. 11 Transfer and Appropriation of Funds for the Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement Project RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the transfer of Capital Improvement Program funds from the Temecula City Entry Monumentation project and appropriate $150,000 for the design and installation of the Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement project. RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 10 -01 Resolution: No. CSD 10 -03 CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 12 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the action minutes of April 27, 2010. 13 Second Amendment with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the Second Amendment with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. for Alarm Monitoring, Inspection, and Repair Services in the amount of $25,000 for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. 14 Third Amendment to the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services Agreement with West Coast Arborists. Inc. for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the Third Amendment with West Coast Arborists, Inc. in the amount of $50,000 for Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 2010- 2011. 15 Third Amendment with Arch Chemicals, Inc., formerly Marine Biochemists. for Water Management/Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Approve the Third Amendment with Arch Chemicals, Inc., formerly Marine Biochemist, in the amount of $46,800 for Water Management/Maintenance Services at the Harveston Lake Park and Temecula Duck Pond for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. 16 Fourth Amendment with Prudential Overall Supply Inc. for Uniform. Floor Mat, Dust Mop. and Towel Cleaning /Rental Services Agreement for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Approve the Fourth Amendment with Prudential Overall Supply Inc. in the amount of $25,000 for Uniform, Floor Mat, and Towel Cleaning /Rental Service for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. 17 Fourth Amendment to the Janitorial Services Agreement for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters with Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management LLC for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the Fourth Amendment with Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC for $63,780 to provide Janitorial Services for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. 18 First Amendment to the HVAC Maintenance Services Agreement with Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering for Heating and Air Conditioning Services for Fiscal Year 2010- 2011. RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Approve the First Amendment with Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering for Heating and Air Conditioning Maintenance Services in the amount of $66,112 for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. CSD BUSINESS 19 Old Town Gymnasium Conceptual Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Approve the Old Town Gymnasium Conceptual Master Plan. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 10 -01 Resolution: No. RDA 10 -06 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Roberts, Washington, Naggar RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 20 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Approve the action minutes of April 27, 2010. 21 Award a Contract for the Old Town Sound System Retrofit RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Award a contract with Western Audio Visual Corp for upgrading the Old Town Sound System in the amount of $71,478.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 21.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $14,295.75, which is equal to 20% of the contract amount; 21.3 Approve the acceleration of $86,000 from the Redevelopment Agency CIP Budget of FY2010 -2011 to the current FY2009 -2010 for the Old Town Sound System Retrofit. RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 22 Comprehensive Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 153 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND 700 FEET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AND BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND THE WEST SIDE OF PUJOL STREET (LR10 -0011) 22.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING GENERAL PLAN MAPS TO DESIGNATE THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TERRITORY AS SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ( "SPI "), ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES (LOCATED SOUTH OF FIRST STREET), REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES (LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SIXTH STREET AND PUJOL STREET), AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO DEFINE SPI, AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO ADD PROVISIONS REGARDING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LR10 -0011) 11 22.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LR10 -0011) 22.4 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP (LR10 -0011) 23 Mall Ring Road Enforcement RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE N0. 10 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 10.22 AND SECTION 10.22.101 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ON PRIVATE ROADS AND PARKING FACILITIES LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 179.1 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (REGIONAL MALL) PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21107.6 AND 21107.8 CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. 12 PRESENTATIONS The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, mental health is critical for our well -being and vitality, as well as that of our families and communities; and WHEREAS, the World Health Organization found that mental illnesses are the number one cause of disability inthe United States and, collectively, are the most prevalent health problems in America today more common than cancer, lung, and heart disease combined; and WHEREAS, one in 10 children has a serious mental health disorder that can lead to school failure, physical illness, substance abuse, and suicide; and WHEREAS, accordingto the 2009 County of Riverside Homeless Count, there are 11,191 homeless adults and children on agiven day; and WHEREAS, according to the same count, nearly 38.69% of the homeless were children under the age of 18 living with ahomeless parent and nearly one -third reported symptoms of mental illness; and WHEREAS, Temecula has made a commitment to community -based mental health care for all residents; and WHEREAS, Mental Health America, the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare, and their national partners observe Mental Health Month each May to raise awareness and understanding of mental illness. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Jeff Comerchero, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the month of May, 2010, to be "Mental Health Month " and call upon all citizens, government agencies, public and private institutions, businesses, and schools to recommit our community to increase awareness and understanding of mental illness, to improve the array of mental health services for consumers of all ages, and to expand the supply of affordable, supportive housing for people living with mental illness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this eleventh day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk The City of Temecula PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems, such as roadway maintenance and repair, drainage facilities, graffiti removal, tree trimming, weed abatement, and special event assistance; and WHEREAS, the health, safety, and comfort of the community greatly depends on these services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these services as well as their planning, design, and construction is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skills of the public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform. NOW, THEREFORE, 1, Jeff Comerchero, on behalf of the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby proclaim the week of May 16 -22, 2010 to be "NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" "Above, Below & All Around" in the City of Temecula, California, and encourages all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing public works services, and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this eleventh day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 1 Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE APRIL 27, 2010 — 7:00 PM 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council /Temecula Redevelopment Agency pursuant to Government Code Section: 1) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property owned by Madison Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, which is commonly known as 27135 Madison Avenue, Temecula, and is identified as Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number 910- 262 -006. Meeting with City negotiators, Greg Butler and Amer Attar, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price and terms. City negotiators may negotiate with the property owner Madison Holdings, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company. 2) Conference with real property negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding real property owned by Basics Etc. Corporation, which is commonly known as 41375 McCabe Court, Temecula, and is identified as Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Number 910 - 262 -008. Meeting with City negotiators, Greg Butler and Amer Attar, regarding instructions to negotiators concerning price and terms. City negotiators may negotiate with the property owner Basics Etc. Corporation. 3) Conference with City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. With respect to such matter, the City Attorney has determined that a point has been reached where there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and City related entities based on existing facts and circumstances. With respect to such matter, the City Council will also meet pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) to decide whether to initiate litigation. Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. At 6:00 P.M., Mayor Comerchero called the Closed Session meeting to order. The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: Joseph Donnantuoni Invocation: Shawn Nelson Flag Salute: Council Member Roberts ROLL CALL: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero Council Member Naggar arrived to the meeting at 7:26 P.M. PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS Travel and Tourism Week in Temecula Proclamation PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; anc electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of April 13, 2010. 3 List of Demands - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; anc electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10 -30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Records Destruction Approval - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. 5 First Amendment to Agreement with Blanca Y. Price for Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; anc electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve a First Amendment to the agreement with Blanca Y. Price in the amount of $15,000 for Landscape Plan Check and Inspection Services for a total agreement amount of $77,000 for Fiscal Year 2009 -2010. 6 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Installation on Temecula Parkway, Project No. PW07 -07 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Installation on Temecula Parkway, Project No. PW07 -07. 7 ADDroval of Tenant Relocation Assistance Policies and Procedures for Substandard Housing Abatement under the State Housing Law - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10 -31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING "TENANT RELOCATION ASSISTANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR SUBSTANDARD HOUSING ABATEMENT UNDER THE STATE HOUSING LAW" 7.2 Establish the "Substandard Housing Abatement Relocation Fund" and allocate $75,000 to this Fund. Consent Calendar Item No. 8 was pulled for separate discussion. 8 Opposition to Proposition 16: The Taxpayers Right to Vote Act (at the request of Council Members Naggar and Washington) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0- 0) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10 -32 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO OPPOSE PROPOSITION 16: THE TAXPAYERS RIGHT TO VOTE ACT, WHICH IS A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT SCHEDULED FOR THE JUNE 2010 BALLOT THAT WOULD REQUIRE COMMUNITIES TO REACH A TWO- THIRDS CONSENSUS VOTE IN ORDER TO FORM A COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION AND WOULD REQUIRE THE SAME LEVEL OF SUPPORT FOR EXPANDING MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Jim Mitchell, Temecula, representing the Sierra Club and Santa Margarita Group, expressed his support of this item. Fred Bartz, Temecula, as well expressed his support of staff's recommendation. 9 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 10 -08 - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Roberts; and electronic vote reflected approval of those present with Council Member Naggar absent. RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10 -08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 2.56 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS At 7:30 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Redevelopment Agency. At 7:33 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT With regard to Closed Session Item Nos. 1 and 2 (real property), City Attorney Thorson advised that these items were not discussed and will be placed on the next Closed Session agenda for discussion. As to Item No. 3 (potential litigation), Mr. Thorson noted that the City Council gave direction but that no action was taken. ADJOURNMENT At 7:35 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 11, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. In Memory of Myles Wilder ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Item No. 3 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Jada Yonker, Accounting Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $2,126,247.70. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor r_T40r:61n Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: F-A y d :. K o 1 l 1► [MIN i I A i 1: 7 4: 6 3 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/22/2010 TOTAL CHECK RUN 04/29/2010 TOTAL CHECK RUN 04/29/2010 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: $ 958,322.38 749,502.30 418,423.02 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 05/11/2010 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 2,126,247.70 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND $ 598,561.94 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 15,541.43 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 237,047.16 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 129.24 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" LANDSCAPE /SLOPE 74,892.14 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,203.32 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 10,786.63 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 6,038.79 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 656,874.49 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 17,275.89 300 INSURANCE FUND 734.42 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 62,478.81 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 13,743.33 340 FACILITIES 12,517.09 $ 1,707,824.68 001 GENERAL FUND $ 256,866.18 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 7,350.98 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 104,205.43 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 136.79 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" LANDSCAPE /SLOPE 3,407.07 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,372.74 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 1,212.70 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 422.39 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT 3,908.27 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,302.50 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 23,975.61 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,091.47 340 FACILITIES 9,170.89 418,423.02 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 2,126,247.70 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138157 04/16/2010 006114 CASEY, MARGIE ee computer purchase program 1,322.17 1,322.17 138158 04/2212010 013514 21ST CENTURY OIL, LLC refund:eng grad dep:42143 OT frnt st 995.00 995.00 138159 04/2212010 011347 A F S INC vehicle emission (BACT) test:PW 14,933.44 credit: service inv 256029 - 255.00 14,678.44 138160 04/2212010 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS misc supplies: tiny tot pgrm 103.75 103.75 138161 04/2212010 013367 ACTIVE MICRO INC misc tools& equipment:pw traffic 335.33 335.33 138162 04/2212010 013515 ADVANTAGE CHEM refund:eng grad dep:30235 ynez rd 995.00 995.00 138163 04/2212010 011322 AIR CLEANING SYSTEMS INC plymovent repair parts: Stn 92 170.00 170.00 138164 04/2212010 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT Mar const:rancho cal pave rehab 399,926.02 Mar const:Pechanga Pkwy ph 11 17,812.56 417,738.58 138165 04/2212010 009374 ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES piano tuning secs: library 150.00 150.00 138166 04/2212010 013530 ANDERSON, WAYNE LEE refund:overpmt prkg cite #74391 60.00 60.00 138167 04/2212010 013531 ANIBALDI, PATRICK refund :viol. dismissed #74863 55.00 55.00 138168 04/2212010 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIF Membership: 88551767 CA 47.00 Membership: 88552195 MW 47.00 Membership: 88552229 KH 47.00 Membership: 88552294 JK 47.00 Membership: 88552336 BW 47.00 Membership: 88552252 SS 47.00 Membership: 72238014 CP 47.00 329.00 138169 04/2212010 013516 AXELSON, GORDON K. refund:eng grad dep:43620 ridge pk dr 995.00 995.00 138170 04/2212010 013105 BACKHAUSDANCE Innerstate Grant: Theater 12,000.00 12,000.00 138171 04/2212010 013517 BEIJING ACUPUNCTURE refund:eng grad dep:43998 vallejo ave 500.00 500.00 Page :1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138172 04/2212010 013384 BELAIRE WEST LANDSCAPE INC Mar const:Wnchester /79 N 100,147.50 100,147.50 138173 04/2212010 002377 BEST BUY COMPANY INC Employee Computer Loan Program 1,030.92 1,030.92 138174 04/2212010 012583 BLANCA Y PRICE 3/29 -4/2 lndscp pin ck svc:planning 9,120.00 credit: invoice exceeds contract amt - 1,997.00 credit: PA1l}0066 /21 sq ft incorrect - 4,710.00 2,413.00 138175 04/2212010 013520 BLOODGOOD, ROBERT refund:eng grad dep:40515 calle fiesta 995.00 995.00 138176 04/2212010 013521 BROSIUS, MARK refund:eng grad dep:43943 calle de vala 995.00 995.00 138177 04/2212010 013524 BUCARO CONSTRUCTION refund:eng grad dep:43601 manzano dr 995.00 995.00 COMPANY 138178 04/2212010 006908 C C & COMPANY INC entertainment:high hopes 3/5 200.00 200.00 138179 04/2212010 013525 CAN BUSINESS PARK, LLC refund:eng grad dep:42400 winchester 995.00 995.00 138180 04/2212010 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 1,026.36 PW patch truck materials 531.04 PW patch truck materials 406.98 PW patch truck materials 340.91 PW patch truck materials 292.09 PW patch truck materials 108.54 2,705.92 138181 04/2212010 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL PAR 2891 cert/compliance:waterslide 250.00 250.00 138182 04/2212010 013533 CATALINA INVESTMENTS refund:eng grad dep:27455 Bostik Ct 995.00 995.00 138183 04/2212010 000137 CHEVRON AND TEXACO City vehicles fuel: Police 1,418.28 1,418.28 138184 04/2212010 003997 COAST RECREATION INC playground equip repairs:tcsd parks 371.30 371.30 138185 04/2212010 008594 COMMUNITY BANK #1418 Inv 148532 All American Asphalt 44,436.23 44,436.23 138186 04/2212010 006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC IS technical consulting:citywide 1,468.56 1,468.56 138187 04/2212010 013286 CONNEXON TELECOM INC city emergency telecom routing 250.00 250.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138188 04/2212010 001264 COSTCO WHOLESALE supplies:art gallery @ merc 166.25 166.25 138189 04/2212010 013379 COUSSOU, CELINE TCSD Instructor Earnings 212.80 TCSD Instructor Earnings 133.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 84.00 429.80 138190 04/2212010 003272 DAISYWHEEL RIBBON COMPANY plotter supplies & ink: GIS 1,155.18 1,155.18 INC 138191 04/2212010 003962 DAVID NEAULT ASSOCIATES INC Mar landscape insp svc: 79 N 1,202.50 1,202.50 138192 04/2212010 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL portable restroom:teen dance 3/22 79.88 79.88 SRVCS 138193 04/2212010 000395 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT S Coast Bus Summit 4 /28:AA,TT,JR,SF 100.00 100.00 CORP 138194 04/2212010 000478 FAST SIGNS 50% deposit signage:mpsc garden 278.95 278.95 138195 04/2212010 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 3/19 -29 city express mail services 175.16 175.16 138196 04/2212010 011922 FIRST AMERICAN CORELOGIC Mar dbase subsc: Code Enf 72.00 72.00 INC 138197 04/2212010 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER AMERICAN PLANNING RJ APA mb 4/10 -3/11: Richardson, P 570.00 ASSOCIATION COSTCO WHOLESALE TT Vizio TV: City Hall hallway 416.19 PROXIM WIRELESS TT radio repair: Theater 400.00 LUCILLE'S BBQ SJ meal: Council closed mtg 3/23 263.40 PAYPAL TT Verisign Payflow Pro Transaction 160.10 GEOTRUST INC TT RapidSSL 156.00 NEW ENGLAND HISTORIC TT Library access membership dues 150.00 AMAZON.COM, INC TT Practical Virtualization Solutions 29.89 PAYPAL TT HP designjet scanner manual: IS 12.99 2,158.57 138198 04/2212010 007008 FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY hazardous waste absorbant:PW 929.82 929.82 138199 04/2212010 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES INC wristbands:job expo 4 /17/10 271.82 271.82 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138200 04/2212010 013527 GARCIA, AMOR refund:tiny tots 1045.103 64.00 64.00 138201 04/2212010 013523 GILL, DARREN refund first aid class 8300.102 32.00 32.00 138202 04/2212010 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies: Fire 474.10 474.10 INC 138203 04/2212010 013528 GONZALES, SARAH refund:sec dep:rm rental:crc 150.00 150.00 138204 04/2212010 003792 GRAINGER self luminous exit sign: Stn 84 1,000.50 1,000.50 138205 04/2212010 013107 GRANT,GLENN broadcasting: ESG weekend 750.00 750.00 138206 04/2212010 013402 GRUBB & ELLIS refund:eng grad dep:41577 margarita 995.00 995.00 138207 04/2212010 008081 HALL & FOREMAN INC mar eng svc:santa gertrudis creek 1,894.00 1,894.00 138208 04/2212010 001135 HEALTH POINTE MEDICAL GROUP emp industrial care srvcs:hr 475.17 475.17 INC 138209 04/2212010 013529 HERNANDEZ, JAIME refund:sec dep:rm rental:crc 150.00 150.00 138210 04/2212010 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, THE hardware supplies: Ch Museum 26.61 26.61 138211 04/2212010 007767 I C COMPOUND COMPANY asphalt releasing agent: PVV Maint 1,423.73 1,423.73 138212 04/2212010 003266 IRON MOUNTAIN OFFSITE Mar storage:City /IS Backup Tape 358.49 358.49 138213 04/2212010 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES Mar affordable housing secs: RDA 3,616.88 3,616.88 INC 138214 04/2212010 002519 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC misc safety supplies: PVV Maint 1,021.54 1,021.54 138215 04/2212010 006916 LENNAR, FORMERLY refund:eng grad dep's (8):Harveston 7,960.00 GREYSTONE HOMES refund:eng grad dep:TM3066 &1,31276 1,990.00 9,950.00 138216 04/2212010 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC medical supplies: paramedics 341.47 341.47 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138217 04/2212010 004813 M & J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC Inflatible bounce equip:egg hunt Paloma 195.00 Inflatible bounce equip:egg hunt 195.00 Inflatible bounce equip:egg hunt Temeku 195.00 Inflatible bounce equip:egg hunt rrps 195.00 780.00 138218 04/2212010 004141 MAINTEX INC Misc custodial supplies:theater 51.86 Misc custodial supplies:tcc 17.50 69.36 138219 04/2212010 011920 MASTER CONCEPTS LLC TCSD Instructor Earnings 872.82 872.82 138220 04/2212010 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS INC. reimb:Old Town storage 647.88 647.88 138221 04/2212010 001892 MOBILE MODULAR 4/11 -5/10 modular lease: the pantry 1,042.91 1,042.91 138222 04/2212010 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEERS consulting srvcs:french v4 y /i -15 10,004.09 10,004.09 138223 04/2212010 010990 MOORE IACOFANO GOLTSMAN feb -mar youth master plan: csd 926.41 926.41 INC 138224 04/2212010 001986 MUZAK- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA May television signal: FOC 103.66 May music broadcast:Old Town 69.11 172.77 138225 04/2212010 010168 MYERS & SONS HI -WAY SAFETY Traffic control supplies:pw maint div 1,498.58 1,498.58 INC 138226 04/2212010 004508 NAGGAR, MICHAEL S. Reimb: Apr'10 Internet Srvcs 34.99 34.99 138227 04/2212010 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 1 yr subscr Nat'l Fire Codes: Fire Prev 810.00 810.00 ASSN 138228 04/2212010 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION 4/6/10.6/30/11 mbrshp: S. Dakin 150.00 150.00 ASSN 138229 04/2212010 013513 NELSON, MICHAEL R. Std field sobriety trng 325-26 (8) 800.00 800.00 138230 04/2212010 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES mar display ads:temecula presents 476.28 476.28 138231 04/2212010 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Mar newspaper subscr:mpsc 29.90 29.90 138232 04/2212010 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs TCSD 686.77 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD 547.12 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD 72.42 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:TCSD 36.57 1,342.88 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138233 04/2212010 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY Misc supplies:high hopes pgrm 288.64 INC Misc supplies:tiny tot pgrm 68.92 Misc supplies:childrens museum 35.91 393.47 138234 04/2212010 012833 PC MALL GOV, INC. Software:ann'I maint 05/14/10- 05/13/11 1,225.00 Monitors:info systems 968.67 Monitors:info systems 968.67 Headsets:info sys 407.82 3,570.16 138235 04/2212010 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 331.08 331.08 138236 04/2212010 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS Supplies & chemicals:town sq fountain 41.60 INC Misc pool supplies:aquatics pgrm 35.27 76.87 138237 04/2212010 012689 POTTY TOTS LLC TCSD Instructor Earnings 79.80 79.80 138238 04/2212010 003697 PROJECT DESIGN overland drive ext 24,802.90 24,802.90 CONSULTANTS 138239 04/2212010 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Mar uniform/flr mat/twl rental:City 1,560.80 1,560.80 138240 04/2212010 013302 PUBLIC GROUP LLC, THE Public Surplus admin fee 959.00 959.00 138241 04/2212010 010214 RADY CHILDRENS HOSPITAL- SD Hospital exam srvcs: police 1,011.00 1,011.00 138242 04/2212010 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT Marvar water meters:TCSD 20,593.17 Mar var water meters 41000 main st 2,053.36 Mar various water meters: Fire Stns 586.87 Mar prkg structure mtr:mercedes st 380.88 Mar var water meters:TCSD 190.191 349.67 Mar var water meters: floating meter 320.77 Mar domestic mtr /prkg struct :mercedes 209.16 Mar var water meters 28922 pujol st 90.06 Mar var water meters main st 76.73 Mar var water meters wolf crk dr s 75.41 Mar var water meters main st 54.30 Mar var water meters:pechanga pkwy 51.72 Mar water meter28640 pujol st 7.93 24,850.03 138243 04/2212010 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING Misc electrical supplies old 398.57 Misc electrical supplies:city hall /pd 116.15 Misc electrical supplies:children museum 100.49 615.21 Pages apChkLst 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 7 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138244 04/2212010 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION Concrete /asphalt saw:pw maint div 254.44 Concretelasphalt saw:pw maint div 140.27 Tool and equip rental: PW Maint 14.96 409.67 138245 04/2212010 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR Mar'10 prkg citation assessments 9,003.50 Feb 10 prkg citation assessments 7,760.75 16,764.25 138246 04/2212010 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO Mar radio rental& maint:police/prk mgr 1,568.58 1,568.58 TECHNOLOGY 138247 04/2212010 005756 RIVERSIDE CO TREASURER refund:sec dep /rm rental:MPSC 250.00 250.00 138248 04/2212010 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC Misc supplies:tiny tot pgrm 247.44 247.44 138249 04/2212010 001500 SAN DIEGO REGIONAL TRAIN Supervisors academy training:! ball 550.00 550.00 CTR 138250 04/2212010 009980 SANBORN, GWYN Country @ the Merc 4/10/10 193.50 193.50 138251 04/2212010 013169 SCHINSKY, WILLIAM C. Mar catalog artifacts: history museum 1,250.00 1,250.00 138252 04/2212010 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA TCSD Instructor Earnings 28.00 28.00 138253 04/2212010 013470 SEATING EXPERTS INC Theater: chairs for Merc 6,355.00 6,355.00 138254 04/2212010 010089 SECURITAS SECURITY SRVCS Feb Security Srvcs:Harveston Lake 1,382.50 USA Mar Security Srvcs:Harveston Lake 875.00 2,257.50 138255 04/2212010 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz @ the Merc 04/08/10 576.80 576.80 138256 04/2212010 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Recreation supplies:dog house pgmi 156.69 Hospitality supplies:theater 84.24 240.93 138257 04/2212010 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Apr 2- 00.397- 5059:comm svc util 10,467.31 Apr 2- 27- 560.0625:32380 deerhollow 3,060.45 Apr 2 -26- 887 - 0789:40233 vtg rd PED 1,591.99 Apr 2- 31- 693 - 9784:26036 ynez TC1 399.65 Apr 2- 30- 296 - 9522:31035 rncho vista 338.23 Apr 2 -29- 974 - 7568:26953 ynez TC1 120.91 Apr 2- 30- 099 - 3847:29721 ryecrest 21.84 Apr 2 -28- 397 - 1315:45869 redhwk pkwy 21.11 16,021.49 138258 04/2212010 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Apr 055 - 4756169- 5:PBSP 184.51 Apr 015-575-0195-2:32211 wolf vty rd 181.03 365.54 Page:7 apChkLst 04/2212010 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF Final Check List 80.00 Page: 8 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM 04/2212010 CITY OF TEMECULA TENG, NATHAN N. refund:eng grad dep:43998 vallejo ave Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) 495.00 138269 Check # Date Vendor refund:sec dep:rm rental:crc Description Amount Paid Check Total 138259 04/2212010 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL Pest control srvcs:theater 420.00 INC credit:billing adj /60% fabrication - 5,000.00 6,000.00 138271 04/2212010 Pest control srvcs:Margarita Park 84.00 504.00 138260 04/2212010 013473 STOUT, STEVE Entertain m ent: b lu egrass festival 3 /20-21 700.00 700.00 138261 04/2212010 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC Apr sweeping srvcs:civic center prkg 500.00 500.00 138262 04/2212010 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS Misc Supplies:Childrens Museum 81.09 Teen dance night: rhythms dance 3/20 575.00 Misc supplies: Tiny Tots pgrm 35.78 116.87 138263 04/2212010 006697 TEM. VLY AUTO DEALERS ASSN legal fees /plan ck fees:Automall Sign 9,250.00 9,250.00 138264 04/2212010 012265 TEMECULA ACE HARDWARE C/O Misc supplies:var park sites 24.66 24.66 138265 04/2212010 010493 TEMECULA TOWNE CENTER May lease pmt:police mall storefront 1,458.33 1,458.33 ASSOC LP 138266 04/2212010 000876 TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON & FY 09/10 Sponsorship 26,775.00 26,775.00 WINE 138267 04/2212010 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER OF State/City 4/22 Gallegos/MacAdam 80.00 80.00 138268 04/2212010 013518 TENG, NATHAN N. refund:eng grad dep:43998 vallejo ave 495.00 495.00 138269 04/2212010 013526 THE DANCERS STUDIO refund:sec dep:rm rental:crc 150.00 150.00 138270 04/2212010 013261 THINKWELL GROUP INC Museum exhibit:childrens museum 11,000.00 credit:billing adj /60% fabrication - 5,000.00 6,000.00 138271 04/2212010 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Apr high speed internet: FS#92 102.45 Apr high speed internet:32364 overland 44.95 147.40 138272 04/2212010 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Sound technician /DJ:egg hunt event 4/3 1,050.00 Teen dance night: rhythms dance 3/20 575.00 Sound tech & dj srvcs:dance 2/26 450.00 2,075.00 138273 04/2212010 000978 TIP OF SW RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1st Qtr Emerg. Response Vol. Prgm 2,442.00 2,442.00 INC 138274 04/2212010 008977 VALLEY EVENTS Event rentals:Easter Egg Hunt 4/2 140.00 140.00 Pageb apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 04/22/2010 12:11:26PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 138275 04/2212010 004261 VERIZON Apr xxx -5072 general usage 2,334.06 Mar xxx -0682 gen use:civic ctr camera 92.64 Mar xxx -0073 general usage 66.62 Apr xxx -3143 gen usage: PD ovrind ofc 53.38 Mar xxx -7562 gen usage:irrig contrlr 38.42 Mar xxx -4723 gen usage: Police 37.72 Apr xxx -8576 general usage 36.57 Apr xxx -5473 gen usage:moraga rd 36.57 Mar xxx -2372 gen usage:wolf crk irrg 36.52 2,732.50 138276 04/2212010 009101 VISION ONE INC Mar showare ticketing srvcs:theater 2,084.20 2,084.20 138277 04/2212010 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC Janitorial supplies: CRC 193.20 193.20 138278 04/2212010 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNCIL Mar'10 TUMF Payment 110,240.00 110,240.00 OF 138279 04/2212010 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY Mar'10 MSHCP payment 19,856.00 19,856.00 138280 04/2212010 000230 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Apr -Jun asmnt eng srvcs:csd 5,666.65 5,666.65 138281 04/2212010 013522 WILLIAM LYON HOMES refund:eng grad dep:TM 32169 995.00 138282 04/2212010 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION Emergency equip supplies:paramedics 845.19 Emergency equip supplies:paramedics 26.09 Grand Total All Checks: 995.00 871.28 958,322.38 Page9 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 PREPARED BY: Rudy Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: April 29, 2010 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 According to Government Code Section 53646, reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio are required to be submitted within thirty days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, as a matter of City practice, the City Treasurer's Report will be distributed directly to you each month. It will also still appear on the first City Council meeting agenda each month for formal acceptance. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31. 2010. GR:jmm Attachment: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 PREPARED BY: Rudy Graciano, Revenue Manager RECOMMENDATION: Approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of March 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2010 Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Reporting period 03/01/2010- 0311/2010 Run Dare aa22,0310 17 95 158,166 01 1,864,802 69 179,917,597.55 181,171,784.81 1.10% 1.370/6 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF`Mt) rsyMRept8 42 Retort Ve[500 Par Market City of Temecula % of City of Temecula, California 43200 Business Park Drive days to Portfolio Management Po. Box 9033 g Temecula, CA, 92590 IMV i� Portfolio Summary (951)694 6430 - -_ —! March 31, 2010 Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Reporting period 03/01/2010- 0311/2010 Run Dare aa22,0310 17 95 158,166 01 1,864,802 69 179,917,597.55 181,171,784.81 1.10% 1.370/6 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF`Mt) rsyMRept8 42 Retort Ve[500 Par Market Book % of days to wm wm Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 355 Equiv. Certificates of Deposit Bank 373,983.53 373,983.A 8]3,929.63 8.63 1,177 153 6.888 6878 Managed Pool Addounts 48,294,82862 48,294,822.62 48,294,822.62 27.99 1 1 8.613 8.628 Letter of credit 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Looal/Agency Investment Funds G5,1 3G,349 99 86,238,17842 G5,1 3G,349 99 3961 1 1 8.648 8.647 Fed eral Ag ends Callable 5eourniies 27,880,888.88 9,325,768.88 27,880,888.88 1232 1,328 1,882 2789 2748 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 24,886,888.88 24,298,94692 24,033,843.68 14.53 782 473 1.832 1864 Investment Contrads 20314BB78 203148878 203148878 123 8979 2,710 6.609 6626 165,450,891.86 166,046,415.27 165,419,535.2 199.99% 429 278 1.133 1.1,18 Investments Cash Passbook/Cbeokirg 7,429,029.10 7,429,02910 7,429,02910 1 1 0.000 0.000 (not included In yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 172,879,920.96 1]3,475,444.37 172,84,584.52 429 278 1.133 1.1,18 Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Reporting period 03/01/2010- 0311/2010 Run Dare aa22,0310 17 95 158,166 01 1,864,802 69 179,917,597.55 181,171,784.81 1.10% 1.370/6 Portfolio TEME CP PM (PRF`Mt) rsyMRept8 42 Retort Ve[500 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2010 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM VTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Bank 95453516 -2 66 -12 GENIM2 USBANK 06/12/2007 673,963.53 673,963.53 673,963.53 5.600 Subtotal and Average 873,983.53 873,983.53 873,983.53 873,983.53 Managed Pool Accounts 1.00 1 2221 60 03 -2 CITY COP RE2 104346006 -1 01-2 IMP 2 104346006 -4 01 -2 RESA2 104346016 -3 01 -2 RESB2 104346000 -4 01 -2 SPTAX2 94669911 -2 03 -1 ACQA2 946699213 03 -1 ACQB3 946699023 03 -1 BOND3 946699063 03 -1 RES A3 94669916 -2 03 -1 RES B2 94669900 -4 03 -1 SPTAXI 793593011 -2 03 -2 ADO 793593009 -2 03 -2 EMW D 2 793593007 -2 03 -2 IMP 2 793593016 -4 03 -2 LOD 2 793593010 -2 03 -2 PWADM2 793593006 -2 03 -2 RES 2 793593000 -3 03 -2 SPTX2 744727011 -2 03 -3 ACQ2 744727002 -2 03 -3 BOND 2 744727007 -2 03 -3 CITY2 744727009 03 -3 EMW D 1 744727006 -3 03 -3 RES3 744727000 -4 03 -3 SP TX 4 94666001 -2 03 -4 ADMIN2 94666005 -1 03 -4 PREP1 94666000 -1 03 -4 RED1 94666006 -2 03 -4 RES2 766776002 -2 03 -6 BON D2 766776007 -2 03 -61MP2 73,747.57 766776006 -2 03 -6 RES2 766776000 -3 03 -6 SP TX3 95453510 -2 66 -12 BON D2 95453516 -4 66 -12 G14 Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 5.600 5.676 153 09/01/2010 5.600 5.678 153 ASSURED GUARANTY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.000 0.966 1.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 65,093.61 65,093.61 65,093.61 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 4,530.51 4,530.51 4,530.51 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 15,113.21 15,113.21 15,113.21 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 124,061.64 124,061.64 124,061.64 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 73,747.57 73,747.57 73,747.57 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 4,229.47 4,229.47 4,229.47 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 4,364.66 4,364.66 4,364.66 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 2,961.04 2,961.04 2,961.04 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 61,616.43 61,616.43 61,616.43 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 124,170.05 124,170.05 124,170.05 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 15,151.74 15,151.74 15,151.74 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 4,071.65 4,071.65 4,071.65 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 3,292.61 3,292.61 3,292.61 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 1,402.16 1,402.16 1,402.16 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 25,242.63 25,242.63 25,242.63 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 336.59 336.59 336.59 0.000 0.000 1 First American Treasury 13,160.90 13,160.90 13,160.90 0.000 0.000 1 Portfollo TEME CID PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 Report Var_ 5 00 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2010 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 1 2221 60 03 -4 CITY COP RE4 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 122216006-3 CITY COPCIP2 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 7,059.52 7,059.52 7,059.52 0.000 0.000 1 122216000-2 CITY COPLPF2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160 -1 RDA 021NT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666006 -2 RDA 06 CIPA2 First American Treasury 312.71 312.71 312.71 0.000 0.000 1 107666001 RDA 06 PRIN First American Treasury 07/27/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666000 -2 RDA 06A INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666016 -3 RDA 06B CIP3 First American Treasury 959 ,432.06 959,432.06 959,432.06 0.000 0.000 1 107666010 -2 RDA 06B INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666016 -2 RDA 06B RES2 First American Treasury 202,115.00 202,115.00 202,115.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666030 -2 RDA 07 CAPI2 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666027 -2 RDA 07 ESC2 First American Treasury 07/01/2009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666020 -2 RDA 07 INT2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107666026 -2 RDA 07 PROJ2 First American Treasury 393,772.03 393,772.03 393,772.03 0.000 0.000 1 107666026 -2 RDA 07 RES2 First American Treasury 316.62 316.62 316.62 0.000 0.000 1 SYSRDA 10 DS 1 RDA 10 DS 1 First American Treasury 03/11/2010 26,623.05 26,623.05 26,623.05 0.000 0.000 1 SYSRDA 10A CIP2 RDA 10A CIP2 First American Treasury 03/11/2010 2,531.10 2,531.10 2,531.10 0.000 0.000 1 94432360 -2 TCSD COP INT First American Treasury 07/01/2009 104,645.00 104,645.00 104,645.00 0.000 0.000 1 94432363 02001 Financial Security Assurance 07/01/2009 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 793593011 -1 03 -2 -1 ACQUI CA Local Agency Investment Fun 29,111,625.54 29,111,625.54 29,111,625.54 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 793593009 -1 03 -2 -1 EMWD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,557,052.13 1,557,052.13 1,557,052.13 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 793593007 -1 03 -2 -1 IMPRO CA Local Agency Investment Fun 602,264.65 602,264.65 602,264.65 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 793593010 -1 03 -2 -1 PW AD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 472,647.57 472,647.57 472,647.57 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 793593006 -3 03 -2 -3 RESER CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,594,377.36 3,594,377.36 3,594,377.36 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 122216006 CITY COP CIP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 5,146,766.69 5,146,766.69 5,146,766.69 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 1 2221 60 03 -1 CITY COP RE1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 619,772.96 619,772.96 619,772.96 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666006 -1 RDA 06 CIP -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666016 -2 RDA 06 CIP -2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666030 -1 RDA 07 CAP -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666027 -1 RDA 07 ESC -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666026 -1 RDA 07 PRO -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,402,066.66 1,402,066.66 1,402,066.66 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666026 -1 RDA 07 RES -1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,105,452.42 1,105,452.42 1,105,452.42 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 107666006 RDA 06 RESA MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434166 RDA TABS RES MBIA Surety Bond 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYS95453516 -1 95453516 -1 USBANK 02/26/2010 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 47,357,508.15 46,294,088.58 46,294,088.58 46,294,088.58 0.513 0.520 1 Portfollo TEME CID Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2010 Page 4 Portfollo TEME CID Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Letter of Credit 104346006 -1 02006 ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2009 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Subtotal and Average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 Local Agency Investment Funds 94669911 -1 03 -1 ADO A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 726,503.39 726,503.39 726,503.39 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 94669921 -1 03 -1 ADO B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 3,670,076.41 3,670,076.41 3,670,076.41 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 744727011 -1 03 -3 ADO 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 923,711.70 923,711.70 923,711.70 0.577 0.569 0.577 1 744727007 -1 03 -3 CITY 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 766776007 -1 03 -6 IMP 1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 157,001.56 157,001.56 157,001.56 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 29,490,940.63 29,516,693.06 29,490,940.63 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,163,536.07 1,164,640.90 1,163,536.07 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSRDA 10 DS 2 RDA 10 DS 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03/11/2010 1,263,919.60 1,263,919.60 1,263,919.60 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSRDA 10A CIP1 RDA 10A CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03/11/2010 665,230.51 665,230.51 665,230.51 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSRDA 10 CIP 1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 03/11/2010 11,116,649.69 11,116,649.69 11,116,649.69 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 15,566,576.03 15,601,349.36 15,566,576.03 0.547 0.540 0.547 1 Subtotal and Average 61,653,769.34 65,186,349.99 65,230,178.42 65,186,349.99 0.540 0.547 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 31331GZ36 01145 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/19/2009 1,000,000.00 1,002,500.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 2.399 2.432 640 07/19/2012 3133XRSM3 01102 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/23/2006 1,000,000.00 1,011,560.00 1,000,000.00 4.050 3.995 4.050 662 01/23/2012 3133XRVA5 01109 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/2006 1,000,000.00 1,012,190.00 1,000,000.00 4.220 4.162 4.220 651 07/30/2012 3133XRM 01116 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/20/2006 1,000,000.00 1,013,440.00 1,000,000.00 4.070 4.014 4.070 672 06/20/2012 3133XUAE3 01131 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/27/2009 1,000,000.00 1,004,060.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 646 07/27/2012 3133XUBXO 01133 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/2009 1,000,000.00 1,005,310.00 1,000,000.00 2.375 2.342 2.375 1,035 01/30/2013 3133XUGS6 01136 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,007,610.00 1,000,000.00 2.500 2.466 2.500 1,062 02/26/2013 3133XUKAO 01136 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,007,610.00 1,000,000.00 2.560 2.545 2.560 1,062 02/26/2013 3133XUNQ2 01141 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/15/2009 1,000,000.00 1,005,000.00 1,000,000.00 1.700 1.677 1.700 714 03/15/2012 3133XVF63 01147 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 1,000,000.00 2.100 2.071 2.100 1,121 04/26/2013 3126X6R46 01126 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 06/25/2009 2,000,000.00 2,012,520.00 2,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 1,161 06/25/2013 3126X6S52 01129 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 06/29/2009 1,000,000.00 1,004,410.00 1,000,000.00 2.450 2.416 2.450 620 06/29/2012 3126X9NT3 01152 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/10/2009 1,000,000.00 997,260.00 1,000,000.00 1.630 1.606 1.630 964 12/10/2012 3136F9CB7 01066 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/11/2006 2,000,000.00 2,120,000.00 2,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,075 03/11/2013 3136F9DP5 01090 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/27/2006 1,000,000.00 1,060,940.00 1,000,000.00 4.000 3.945 4.000 1,091 03/27/2013 3136FHRX5 01126 Federal National Mtg Assn 05/21/2009 1,000,000.00 1,002,610.00 1,000,000.00 2.125 2.096 2.125 1,511 05/21/2014 3136FHXF7 01127 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/10/2009 1,000,000.00 1,007,500.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 964 12/10/2012 3136FHY66 01132 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/03/2009 1,000,000.00 1,005,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 655 06/03/2012 31396AYN6 01134 Federal National Mtg Assn 07/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,007,500.00 1,000,000.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 1,579 07/26/2014 3136FJAD3 01140 Federal National Mtg Assn 09/03/2009 1,000,000.00 1,007,190.00 1,000,000.00 2.200 3.519 3.566 977 12/03/2012 Portfollo TEME CID Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2010 Page 5 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331 XMQ2 Average Purchase 01092 31331Y3P3 01105 Stated YTM YTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Callable Securities 313569E25 01 -2 RESA9 313569E25 01 -2 RESB9 313569E25 01 -2 SPTAX9 31396AYM6 01139 313569E25 03 -02 LC9 313569E25 31396AZD7 01142 Federal National Mtg Assn 313569E25 09/21/2009 1,000,000.00 1,001,660.00 1,000,000.00 2.170 2.140 2.170 1,065 03/21/2013 3136FJFD6 01143 Federal National Mtg Assn 03 -1 SPTAX9 09/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,003,750.00 1,000,000.00 2.050 2.022 2.050 1,002 12/26/2012 3136FJHX2 01146 Federal National Mtg Assn 10/15/2012 10/26/2009 1,000,000.00 1,002,190.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 1,002 12/26/2012 3136FJNN7 01146 Federal National Mtg Assn 1,000,000.00 11/16/2009 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.973 2.000 1,692 11/16/2014 31396AZY1 01149 Federal National Mtg Assn 1.500 11/10/2009 1,000,000.00 1,010,000.00 1,000,000.00 3.125 3.062 3.125 1,664 11/10/2014 2.250 Subtotal and Average 27,000,000.00 602 27,000,000.00 27,325,750.00 27,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 2.709 2.746 1,068 1.603 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 31331 XMQ2 01059 31331YG46 01092 31331Y3P3 01105 31331Y3N6 01111 31331 GF47 01135 31331 GG37 01137 31331 GZ44 01144 3133XRRU6 01101 3133XSWM6 01124 3133XTN65 01125 3133XTXC5 01130 3133XVEM9 01150 3133XVRS2 01151 313569E25 01 -2 RESA9 313569E25 01 -2 RESB9 313569E25 01 -2 SPTAX9 31396AYM6 01139 313569E25 03 -02 LC9 313569E25 03 -02 RES9 313569E25 03 -02 SPTAX9 313569E25 03 -04 RED9 313569E25 03 -04 RES9 313569E25 03 -06 RES9 313569E25 03 -06 SPTAX9 313569E25 03 -1 RESA9 313569E25 03 -1 RESB9 313569E25 03 -1 SPTAX9 313569E25 03 -3 RES9 313569E25 03 -3 SPTAX9 313569E25 66 -12 BND9 Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 Federal Farm Credit Bank 01/26/2007 1,000,000.00 1,007,190.00 1,000,000.00 5.000 4.934 5.002 55 05/26/2010 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/21/2006 2,000,000.00 2,042,500.00 1,993,700.00 2.630 2.703 2.740 365 04/21/2011 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/15/2006 1,000,000.00 1,039,060.00 996,140.00 3.500 3.514 3.563 550 10/03/2011 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/30/2006 1,000,000.00 1,036,660.00 999,000.00 3.625 3.610 3.661 470 07/15/2011 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/29/2009 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 997,500.00 2.250 2.264 2.316 1,215 07/29/2013 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/04/2009 1,000,000.00 1,009,690.00 1,000,000.00 2.150 2.121 2.150 1,040 02/04/2013 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/15/2009 1,000,000.00 999,360.00 1,000,000.00 1.550 1.529 1.550 926 10/15/2012 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/03/2006 1,000,000.00 1,037,190.00 996,570.00 3.625 3.626 3.676 456 07/01/2011 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/23/2009 1,000,000.00 1,016,130.00 1,000,000.00 2.100 2.071 2.100 662 01/23/2012 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/07/2009 1,000,000.00 1,009,060.00 1,000,000.00 1.500 1.479 1.500 565 11/07/2011 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/11/2009 1,000,000.00 1,020,310.00 1,000,000.00 2.250 2.219 2.250 602 06/11/2012 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/04/2009 1,000,000.00 1,002,610.00 1,000,000.00 1.625 1.603 1.625 965 11/21/2012 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/16/2009 1,000,000.00 999,690.00 999,750.00 1.000 0.996 1.012 636 12/26/2011 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 442,056.67 441,616.61 441,606.99 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 203,496.12 203,294.62 203,290.10 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 254,253.26 253,999.03 253,993.36 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 06/10/2009 1,000,000.00 1,006,560.00 991,250.00 1.750 2.024 2.052 662 06/10/2012 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 2,644,430.70 2,641,566.27 2,641,523.06 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 367.94 367.57 367.56 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 660,275.45 659,615.17 659,600.50 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 17,765.92 17,746.15 17,747.76 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 96,566.21 96,469.64 96,467.50 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 336,266.41 337,950.12 337,942.60 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 69,595.39 69,525.79 69,524.25 0.200 0.400 0.406 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 667,161.16 666,314.00 666,294.73 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 223,795.70 223,571.90 223,566.93 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 369,636.94 369,449.10 369,440.44 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 2,160,331.53 2,176,151.20 2,176,102.75 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 407,472.74 407,065.27 407,056.21 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 359.52 359.16 359.15 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Portfollo TEME CID PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments March 31, 2010 Page 6 Investment Average Purchase Stated YTM VTM Daysto Maturity CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Bullet Securities 66 -12 RES 2 IXIS Funding Corp 07/24/1996 1,531,466.76 1,531,466.76 1,531,466.76 5.430 5.509 5.565 2,710 09/01/2017 313569E25 66 -12 GENI9 Federal National Mtg Assn 03/01/2010 66,920.10 66,651.16 66,649.65 0.200 0.203 0.206 153 09/01/2010 Subtotal and Average 24,033,643.56 24,065,000.00 24,290,944.98 24,033,643.56 1.632 1.654 473 Investment Contracts 95453516 -1 66 -12 GEN IM IXIS Funding Corp 07/24/1996 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00 5.430 5.509 5.565 2,710 09/01/2017 95453516 -1 66 -12 RES 2 IXIS Funding Corp 07/24/1996 1,531,466.76 1,531,466.76 1,531,466.76 5.430 5.509 5.565 2,710 09/01/2017 Subtotal and Average 2,031,468.76 2,031,468.76 2,031,468.76 2,031,468.76 5.509 5.585 2,710 Total and Average 170,017,507.55 Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 165, 450,891.86 166, 046,415.27 165,419, 535.42 1.133 1.148 278 Portfollo TEME CP PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 City of Temecula, California Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash March 31, 2010 Page 7 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 170,017,507.55 Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 172,879,920.96 173,475,444.37 172,848, 564.52 1 1.133 1.148 278 Portfollo TEME CID PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Retention Escrow Account SYSAAA #1202 AAA #1202 COMMUNITY BANK 07/01/2009 1,216,162.90 1,216,162.90 1,216,162.90 0.000 0.000 1 4110170261 EDGEDEV TORRY PINES BANK 07/01/2009 1,621,597.60 1,621,597.60 1,621,597.60 0.000 0.000 1 23303600 PCL CONST Wells Fargo Bank 07/01/2009 1,592,176.60 1,592,176.60 1,592,176.60 0.000 0.000 1 Passbook /Checking Accounts SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2009 2,610.00 2,610.00 2,610.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSFIex Ck Acct Flex Ck Acct Union Bank of California 07/01/2009 11,934.76 11,934.76 11,934.76 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 2,773,961.15 2,773,961.15 2,773,961.15 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2009 10,343.67 10,343.67 10,343.67 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 170,017,507.55 Run Date_ 04/28/2010 -17 03 172,879,920.96 173,475,444.37 172,848, 564.52 1 1.133 1.148 278 Portfollo TEME CID PM (PRF_PM2) SymRapt 6 42 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through March 31, 2010 Grand Total: $173,475,444.37 Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $45,583,129.25 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 675.45 101 STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND 1,222,074.25 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 4,469,780.75 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 0.07 150 AB 2766 FUND 478,350.33 160 AB 3229 0.07 165 RDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 20% 22,023,197.90 170 MEASURE A FUND 6,787,868.91 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY 1,113,708.64 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET 350.38 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "C" 611,633.25 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" 120,255.22 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" 8,395.16 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE 185,725.90 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 1,242,919.65 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 23,031,714.51 273 CFD 03 -1 CROWNE HILL 4,618,225.52 275 CFD 03 -3 WOLF CREEK 1,005,505.64 276 CFD 03 -6 HARVESTON 2 158,403.74 277 CFD - RORIPAUGH 31,553,304.22 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 1,568,941.35 300 INSURANCE FUND 772,725.52 310 VEHICLES FUND 895,410.74 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 690,304.18 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 361,415.69 340 FACILITIES 270,998.65 370 CITY 2008 COP'S DEBT SERVICE 825,627.06 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT 14,219.89 380 RDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,642,369.18 390 TCSD 2001 COP'S DEBT SERVICE 107,776.46 460 CFD 88 -12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 4,245,610.72 472 CFD 01 -2 HARVESTON A &B DEBT 1,032,743.51 473 CFD 03 -1 CROWNE HILL DEBT 1,641,791.59 474 AD 03 -4 JOHN WARNER ROAD 137,600.17 475 CFD 03 -3 WOLF CREEK DEBT 3,046,277.46 476 CFD 03 -6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT 467,446.66 477 CFD 03 -02 RORIPAUGH DEBT 8,538,313.80 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE- 652.93 Grand Total: $173,475,444.37 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for Special Tax Administration Services PREPARED BY: David Bilby, Senior Debt Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with NBS for an annual amount not to exceed $55,219.23 for fiscal year 2010- 11 for special tax administration for the City's Community Facilities Districts and Assessment District. BACKGROUND: On May 12, 2009, the City executed a one -year professional services agreement with N BS for fiscal year 2009 -10, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year terms. NBS, as special tax consultant to the City, provides comprehensive special tax administration services including: calculating the annual special tax levy; receiving and responding to all taxpayer phone calls; monitoring delinquencies; disclosure reporting; bond call preparation; payoff calculations; and annual reporting for the City's seven special tax districts. The City of Temecula has six (6) existing Community Facilities Districts and one (1) Assessment District: • CFD 88 -12 (Ynez Corridor) • CFD 01 -2 (Harveston) • CFD 03 -1 (Crowne Hill) • CFD 03 -2 (Roripaugh Ranch) • CFD 03 -3 (Wolf Creek) • CFD 03 -6 (Harveston II) • AD 03 -4 (John Warner Road) The City has been extremely satisfied with the services of NBS, therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the Council approve an amendment to the professional services agreement with NBS to provide special tax administration for the City's Community Facilities Districts and Assessment District for fiscal year 2010 -11. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the agreement is not to exceed $55,219.23 for fiscal year 2010 -11. Funds for the administration of special districts are included in the annual special tax levies for each of the Districts. ATTACHMENT: FirstAmendment to the Professional Services Agreement for Special Tax Administration Services FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND NBS FOR SPECIAL TAX ADMINISTRATION SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and NBS, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On May 12, 2009 the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services Between the City of Temecula and NBS For Special Tax Administration Services ", in the amount of $59,857.21. b. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement by one year and authorize an additional year of expenditures in the amount of $55,219.23 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. follows: 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than May 12th, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The FIRST Amendment amount shall not exceed Fifty Five Thousand Two Hundred Nineteen Dollars and Twenty Three Cents ($55,219.23) for additional Tax Administration Services for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Fifteen Thousand Seventy Six Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($115,076.44)." 4. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. R:\Agreements \Finance Dept Agreements\AGREEMENTS - 2009 -10 \NBS Amendment FY10 -11 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA NBS (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Michael Rentner, President & CEO ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: Michael Rentner, Secretary CONSULTANT NBS 32605 Temecula Pkwy, Suite # 100 Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 2964997 (951) 296 -1998 F FSM Initials: Date: (5 R %greementsTinance Dept Agreements\AGREEMENTS - 2009 -10WBS Amendment FY10 -11 ATTACHMENT A The Consultant shall be paid based on the fee schedule provided by the Consultant attached hereto and set forth in full, but in no event shall the total sum for fiscal year 2010/11 exceed $55,219.23 for the total term of the Agreement as shown below. Special Tax Administration Contract Fee Schedule CD = Continuing Disclosure (Includes Dissemination Costs) R:\Agreements \Finance Dept Agreements\AGREEMENTS - 2009 -10\NBS Amendment M 0 -11 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Rich Johnston, Building Official DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Agreement for Weed Abatement Services with Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. PREPARED BY: Theresa Harris, Development Processing Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Annual Agreement with Inland Empire Property Services Inc., to provide Weed Abatement Services for fiscal year 2009 -10 in the amount of $40,000.00. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is responsible for the forced abatement in association with hazard vegetation. The City contracts with an approved weed abatement company to ensure the removal of hazardous vegetation for parcel owners that are not in compliance. The parcel owners are billed to recover the service costs plus an administrative fee. The city places a lien on the properties that do not remit payment for the billing notice as required to facilitate cost recovery for the services. A Request for Proposal (RFP) was sent out on March 22, 2010 to nine (9) firms. The City received two proposals in response. After a review of the proposals, staff determined Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. to be the more responsive and responsible firm to perform the weed abatement services. Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. has provided the Citywith weed abatement services for the past three years. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are budgeted in the FY 2009 -10 Code Enforcements line item 001 - 162 - 611 -5440, titled Weed Abatement. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement for Fiscal Year 2009 -10 AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES, INC. WEED ABATEMENT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 11, 2010, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Inland Empire Property Services, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on May 11, 2010, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2010, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for three (3) additional one (1) year term(s). In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2013. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each calendar year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles- Anaheim - Riverside Area published monthly by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (CPI). 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ( "Work "), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars ($40,000) annually unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non - disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. H Contractor shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 8. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by E written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 9. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, District, and /or Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, District and /or Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non - performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 3 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and /or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may 0 provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 11. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 14. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 5 15. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Agreement, Contractor shall file an affidavit with the City Manager stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 16. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub - contractors for this project, during his /her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub - contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 18. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 20. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 21. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set I forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 Use this Address for a Delivery Service: City of Temecula or Hand - Deliveries ONLY Attn: City Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please call 951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. Attn: Chuck Maciel P O Box 9908 Moreno Valley, CA 92552 -1908 22. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 23. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 24. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 7 25. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 26. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. E IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Chuck Maciel, President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. Attn: Chuck Maciel P O Box 9908 Moreno Valley, Ca 92552 -1908 951 - 924 -6905 Phone 951 - 924 -7773 Fax gotweeds @msn.com E FSM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK UNDERSTANDING AND PROPOSED APPROACH Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. proposes to meet with the City of Temecula Code Enforcers prior to the weed abatement season so that we are all on a first name basis as we serve your City. We will establish a rapport with the Code Enforcers by laying out a detailed plan on how we operate effectively and what it requires from the Code Enforcer in order for Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. to perform effectively. It is a basic formula that requires team efforts from the City as well as the contractor. We meet with Code Enforcers to understand their objectives and requirements and establish the guidelines as to what is weed abatement and nuisance abatement. When Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. arrives to a jobs' location we first start by taking before pictures of the parcel and then proceed to mow and cut the vegetation to a length of no higher than four (4 ") inches from the solid surface per the City of Temecula's requirements, and weed eat any area that the tractor can not access. Trim trees up to 8' from the ground, pick up any trash, junk and debris, including tires, concrete and asphalt and disposes of such items at an approved landfill or recycle center. Any areas where sidewalks or streets exist we will clear of weeds and any dirt that may have been dumped on the sidewalk or street will be removed. Once the job has been completed, after pictures are taken from the same locations as the before pictures to show evidence as best as the environment allows to show the work performed. After the work is completed the team leader returns to the office to drop off the work performed. The office staff takes this information and begins the process of producing an invoice and compiling photos of the work completed. Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. will deliver to the City of Temecula an invoice attached to a CD containing color photos for each individual parcel completed. The CD will clearly be labeled with the APN # or address of the work completed making it easy for the Code Enforcer to review the work and file away as done. Anything less would be a disservice to a City. 10 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE BILLING RATES AND SCHEDULE OF FEES A) Weed Abatement • Mowing • Each Additional Acre or fraction thereafter $105.00 Up to 1 Acre (does not include handwork) $99.75 Per Acre (does not include handwork) • Parcels one quarter (0.25) Acre or less $145 (includes handwork) • Handwork — weed eating $45.00 Per Man Hour (work that cannot be performed with tractor along property edge fence lines) • Dust Control $125.00 Per Hour 4 Hour Minimum Plus Water Charges • Special Equipment $125.00 Per Hour (Bobcat; for slopes or other areas needing special equipment for clearing) Dozer Work $600 Per Hour 4 Hour Minimum B) Clean up & Trash Removal • Trash Removal $105.00 Per Cubic Yard • Asphalt/Concrete Removal $125.00 Per Cubic Yard • Dump Fees Actual Receipt (Copy) 11 Billing Rates and Schedule of Fees Cont'd C) Pool Pumping • Pool /Spa Pumping $325.00 Includes pumping of 1 pool and /or 1 spa D) Securing/ board up of vacant/abandoned /substandard structures • Minimum Charge $150.00 • Small Window Under 24x24 $75.00 • Standard Window Under 48x48 $90.00 • Large Window under 48x96 $100.00 • Jumbo Window under 96x96 $125.00 • Slider Window $125.00 • Pedestrian Door w/o hinges $100.00 • Pedestrian Door w/ hinges $125.00 • Garage Door Time and Material @ $45.00 Per Man Hour E) Demolition and removal of Structures • Time and Materials F) Installation of Temporary fencing • Time and Materials G) Emergency Abatement of wells, septic tank systems, or excavations • Time and Materials H) Photographing and otherwise documenting work performed under the contract • CD of Digital Color Photos Included 1) Travel Costs Not applicable. Except after 4:30pm — Time and a half, plus materials. J) Administrative Overhead costs related to this contract Included • Invoice attached to a CD with the property address or APN# clearly marked. 12 Billing Rates and Schedule of Fees Cont'd K) Other Services Provided —Tree Trimming Trimming of Tree 8' up from Ground • Trimming of Tree above 8' from Ground Charles Maciel President, Inland Empire Property Services, Inc. 13 $45 Per Hour Plus $40.00 Per Cubic Yard (plus actual dump cost) $45 Per Hour Plus $40.00 Per Cubic Yard (plus actual dump cost, plus Boom Lift rental cost) Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Quitclaim deeds granting two drainage easements for the Temecula Creek Channel to Riverside County Flood Control - Parcel Map No. 33545 (southeast corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road) PREPARED BY: Mayra De LaTorre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING OFFERS OF DEDICATION MADE ON PARCEL MAP 33545 FOR FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENTS 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TWO QUITCLAIM DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFC &WCD) TWO DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR THE TEMECULA CREEK CHANNEL, STAGE 2 (PARCEL MAP NO. 33545) BACKGROUND: The Temecula Creek Channel, Stage 2 - Project No. 7- 0- 00055- 02, has been completed and Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District is prepared to accept the channel improvements for maintenance in accordance with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, recorded on August 11, 2006 by the District, the City of Temecula, and Butterfield Ranch Self Storage, Inc. The required flood control facilities include construction of approximately 700 lineal feet of concrete slope protection. Pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement, the developer will construct said facilities and the County Flood Control District will assume ownership and maintenance responsibility for the creek channel improvements after satisfactory completion. The recorded Parcel Map 33545 included two drainage easements located within Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, respectively to accommodate the creek channel improvements. The easements are more specifically described as "a Storm Drain Easement within Parcel 1 for Flood Control and Maintenance Purposes" and "a 65' Wide Storm Drain Easement within Parcel 2 for Flood Control and Maintenance Purposes ". At the time of map recordation the City did not accept the offer of dedication of the storm drain easements. In order for the District to accept the storm drain system for maintenance the City needs to accept the two offers of dedication of said drainage easements and execute the attached two quitclaim deeds conveying the drainage easements to the District. With the approval of this resolution, the drainage easements as shown on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 33545 will be formally accepted by the City. Upon City Council acceptance of the drainage easements and execution of the quitclaim deeds, the quitclaim deeds will be forwarded to Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District and County of Riverside Board of Supervisors for their approval and recordation. Staff recommends the execution of the quitclaim deeds conveying the easements to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will be relieved of maintenance responsibility. ATTACHMENTS: Accepting Offers of Dedication Resolution No. 2010_ Approving Quit Claim Deeds Resolution No. 2010_ Quit Claim Deed labeled RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -502 and Plat labeled Exhibit "A' (Original conveyed to Clerk by separate memo) Quit Claim Deed labeled RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -503 and Plat labeled Exhibit "A' (Original conveyed to Clerk by separate memo) RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING AN OFFER OF DEDICATION MADE ON PARCEL MAP 33545 FOR FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine, and declare that: A. Parcel Map 33545 was recorded on February 27, 2006 in Parcel Map Book 216, Pages 18 through 20, inclusive, records of the Recorder's Office, Riverside County, State of California; B. Two flood control easements were offered for dedication to the City on Parcel Map 33545 consisting of the following (the "Easements "): 1. Easement for flood control and maintenance purposes within Parcel 1, as shown and dedicated on Parcel Map No. 33545, recorded in Parcel Map Book 216, Pages 18 through 20, inclusive, records of the Recorder's Office, Riverside County, State of California, as shown as "Exhibit A," attached hereto, for reference purposes only. 2. The 65 -foot wide easement for flood control purposes within Parcel 2, as shown and dedicated on Parcel Map No. 33545, recorded in Parcel Map Book 216, Pages 18 through 20, inclusive, records of the Recorder's Office, Riverside County, State of California, as shown as "Exhibit A," attached hereto, for reference purposes only. C. The City now desires to accept the Easements. Section 2. The City of Temecula hereby accepts the Easements. Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Resolution or such documents as are necessary to confirm the acceptance of the Easements. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized and directed to approve, accept, and execute on behalf of the City such documents and instruments as necessary to effectuate the acceptance of the Easements. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: F- Ayd:.Ko1l1► [MIN diIAdil:l:4:63 NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TWO QUITCLAIM DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (RCFC &WCD) TWO DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR THE TEMECULA CREEK CHANNEL, STAGE 2 (PARCEL MAP NO. 33545) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that: A. The Temecula Creek Channel, Stage 2 concrete slope protection improvements (Project No. 7 -0- 00055 -02) were constructed along the northerly bank of the Temecula Creek to act as flood control protection for the proposed commercial development of Parcel Map 33545; B. Two Offers of Dedication for drainage easements were made by the owners of Parcel Map 33545 to the City of Temecula on behalf of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (DISTRICT) to accommodate the construction and maintenance of said channel improvements but were not accepted by the City at the time of map recordation; C. By Resolution No. 10- adopted on May 11, 2010, the City Council accepted the Offers of Dedication for drainage easements described in the attached Quit Claim Deeds that were made by the owners of within Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 33545 to the City of Temecula; D. The DISTRICT is prepared to accept the Temecula Creek Channel, Stage 2 improvements for maintenance in accordance with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement, executed on August 11, 2006, by the DISTRICT, the City of Temecula, and Butterfield Ranch Self Storage, Inc. including said drainage easements within Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 33545; D. Accepting said Offers of Dedication for the two drainage easements within Parcels 1 and 2 of Parcel Map 33545 and conveying the drainage easements to the DISTRICT is necessary to comply with the terms of the Cooperative Agreement recorded on August 11, 2009 by the District, City and Butterfield Ranch Self Storage, Inc. and serves the public interests. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Quit Claim deeds attached hereto as Exhibits 1 and 2. The City Council further directs and authorizes the Mayor to executed said Quit Claim deeds on behalf of the City. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: F-A y d :. K o 1 l 1► [MIN i I A i 1: 7 4: 6 3 1► to] x.Ko1l1► [MIN d /IAd /l1J4:&1 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk Recorded at request of, and return to: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, California 92501 NO FEE (GOV. CODE 6103) Temecula Creek Channel, Stage 2 Project No.: 7 -0- 00055 -02 Parcel Map 33545 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ NONE QUITCLAIM DEED RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -502 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, does hereby remise, release, and forever quitclaim to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT all right, title and interest in and to the easement situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: The easement for flood control and maintenance purposes within Parcel 1 as shown and dedicated on Parcel Map No. 33545, recorded in Parcel Map Book 216, Pages 18 through 20 inclusive, records of the Recorder's Office, Riverside County, State of California, as shown as Exhibit "A ", for reference purposes only. Date ATTESTS: Susan W. Jones, MMC, Clerk to the City of Temecula City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation: : JEFF COMERCHERO, Mayor (seal) EXHIBIT "A" PARCEL MAP 33545 PM 216/18-20 PARCEL PARCEL 5 PARCEL 4 PARCEL 6 PARCEL 7 TNT NOT TO SCALE PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 'OPEN SPACE PARCEL' 7055-503 EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON 65' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON SHEET 1 OF 2 7 0 70 r7O55-502 TNT NOT TO SCALE PARCEL 2 PARCEL 1 'OPEN SPACE PARCEL' 7055-503 EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON 65' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON SHEET 1 OF 2 PARCEL MAP 33545 PM 216/18 -20 PARCEL1 PARCEL 7 1 \ ya TOE � s \ 3s N7 y5 ��f) \ D\yO N NOT TO SCALE SHEET 2 OF 2 PARCEL 4 NJ 6.16' 46 9g 6--, P L20 v p -325.00' L=9.52' rellizi 9: = PARCEL 2 N8t'39'�3 E 7055 -502 EXHIBIT "A" R =235 N55- 36'29 D =50'20'34" 110.12' L= 206.48' � s 4' N / i PARCEL 1 z rn 15 EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON NO. RADIUS DELTA ARC C2 35.00' 45 036'18" 27.86' C3 50.00' 86 °07'08" 75.07' C4 35.00' 53 056'12" 32.95' LINE DATA NO. BEARING DIST. L2 N68045'1 8"E 79.46' L3 N65 052'03 "E 63.89' L4 N59 012'07 "E 55.01' L20 N28 021'28 "E 12.98' RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -502 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the quitclaim deed, dated from the CITY OF TEMECULA to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of said District adopted on May 12, 1961, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date By: WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager -Chief Engineer Recorded at request of, and return to: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District 1995 Market Street Riverside, California 92501 NO FEE (GOV. CODE 6103) Temecula Creek Channel, Stage 2 Project No.: 7 -0- 00055 -02 Parcel Map 33545 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX $ NONE QUITCLAIM DEED RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -503 FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, does hereby remise, release, and forever quitclaim to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT all right, title and interest in and to the easement situated in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: The 65 -foot wide easement for flood control purposes within Parcel 2 as shown and dedicated on Parcel Map No. 33545, recorded in Parcel Map Book 216, Pages 18 through 20 inclusive, records of the Recorder's Office, Riverside County, State of California, as shown as Exhibit "A ", for reference purposes only. Date ATTESTS: Susan W. Jones, MMC, Clerk to the City of Temecula City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation: C JEFF COMERCHERO, Mayor (seal) EXHIBIT "A39 PARCEL MAP 33545 PM 216/18-20 PARCEL 5 PARCEL 6 \A PARCEL 7 70 I, -po\ 70 r7O55-502 to NOT TO SCALE PARCEL 4 7055 -503 055-503 ol 0 ,-�- lY-, " ""\ 1�\ PARCEL 2 EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON 65' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON SHEET 1 OF 2 bpVm pyp UO�f Tx PARCEL 1 'OPEN SPACE PARGEC EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON 65' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON SHEET 1 OF 2 EXHIBIT "A" ROVE �9 SOj r 21.95' 3p2,49 ,.j9 4a PARCEL 3 `\ PARCEL 4 PARCEL 2 N NOT TO SCALE PARCEL MAP 33545 PM 216/18 -20 PARCEL 2 18 65' WIDE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL PURPOSES TO THE PUBLIC DEDICATED HEREON b� N55'36'29� 110.12' -s PARCEL 1 7055 -503 z l L J SHEET 2 OF 2 RCFC Parcel No. 7055 -503 CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the quitclaim deed, dated from the CITY OF TEMECULA to RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the Board of Supervisors of said District adopted on May 12, 1961, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Date By: WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager -Chief Engineer Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting for Additional Engineering and Landscape Architecture Design Services Associated with the Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification - Project No. PW06 -15 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer Chris White, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting in an amount not to exceed $8,500.00 to provide additional engineering and landscape architecture design services for Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification, Project No. PW06 -15. BACKGROUND: On March 6, 2007, the City Council approved a $176,916 agreement with RBF Consulting for professional engineering and landscape architecture design services for Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification, Project No. PW06 -15, and authorized the City Manager to approve Extra Work Authorizations (EWA's) not to exceed the 10% contingency amount of $17,991.60. During the design process four EWA's, which depleted the contingency funding, were approved by the City Manager to address additional design services and fees that came to light. On February 23, 2010, the City Council approved the $4200 Second Amendment which amended the scope of work and fee as needed to address plan -check comments. Construction on the Winchester Road/ Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification Project is well underway. The project plans show that the recycled water line is to be installed in the parkway behind the sidewalk. During the approval process, Rancho California Water District (RCWD) notified the City that due to the proximity of the reclaimed water line to the potable waterline the Health Department mandates costly periodic tests that require shutting off water services of adjacent businesses for an entire day make certain no mistaken cross - connections occurred. To avoid this requirement, RCWD recommended that the recycled water line be placed in the middle of Winchester Road, under the medians. The Third Amendment, which is being considered this evening, will compensate the designer for the necessary redesign of the recycled water line to align it in the middle of Winchester Road; the estimated cost is $8,500.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The Winchester Road /Highway 79 North Corridor Beautification Project is a Capital Improvement Program project funded with Capital Project Reserves, CFD (Roripaugh Ranch), Development Impact Fees, and a federal Transportation Enhancement Activity (TEA) grant. The total design cost, including the $8,500 third amendment, the original agreement, the two previously approved amendments, and the 10% contingency, comes to $210,607.60. Sufficient funds are available in the project accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Third Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with RBF Consulting 2. Project Location 3. Project Description THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND RBF CONSULTING WINCHESTER ROAD /HIGHWAY 79 NORTH CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT PROJECT NO. PW06 -15 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and RBF CONSULTING a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On March 5, 2007, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Engineering and Landscape Architectural Design Services ", in the amount of $179,916.00. b. The Agreement was amended on August 29, 2008, extending the term of the Agreement to July 1, 2010. The Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement." C. The Agreement was amended on February 23, 2010 in the amount of $4,200.00. The Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement." d. The parties now desire to increase the not to exceed amount and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 5 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Third Amendment amount shall not exceed Eight Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($8,500) for additional revisions to plans for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Ninety Two Thousand Six Hundred Sixteen Dollars and No Cents ($ 192,616.00)." 3. Exhibit "A" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA RBF Consulting (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Michael A. Tylman, P.E, Senior Vice President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: Ernest Wade, Vice President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT RBF Consulting Attn: Michael A. Tylman 40810 County Center Drive, #100, Temecula, Ca. 92590 951 - 676 -8042 951 - 676 -7240 Mtylman @rbf.com FSM Initials: Date: P ATTACHMENT A Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Consultant. PROJECT LOCATION Project Title: WINCHESTER ROADMIGHWAY 79 NORTH CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION Promenade Mall 84 elm PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Title: Project Type: Description: Department: Scope of Project: Benefit: Project Cost: Administration Construction Construction Engineering Design Totals Source of Funds: Capital Project Reserves CFD (Roripaugh Ranch) DIF (street Improvements) TEA Total Funding: WINCHESTER ROADMIGHWAY 79 NORTH CORRIDOR BEAUTIFICATION Circulation PRIORITY: 1 Improve existing raised concrete median along Winchester Road with landscaping, hardscape, irrigation, and architectural embellishments. In addition, left turn pockets will be extended. The scope of the project will be reduced to compete with the approved funding. Public Works — Account No. 210.165.638 Winchester Road/Highway 79 North from Interstate -15 at Ynez Road to City limits south of Willows Avenue. Project will enhance the corridor. Actuals to Date 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 $ 147,431 $ 228,404 $ 2,728,800 $ 90,000 $ 201,973 $ 8,242 $ 349,404 $ 3,055,446 $ $ $ $ $ 39,800 $ 1,186,914 $ 309,604 $ 735,532 $ 1,133,000 $ 349,404 $ 3,055,446 $ Future O & M Cost: $ 900 Annually 85 Total Project Cost $ 375,835 $ 2,728,800 $ 90,000 $ 210,215 $ 3,404,850 $ 39,800 $ 1,186,914 $ 1,045,136 $ 1,133,000 $ 3,404,850 Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Director of Public Works /City Engineer DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009 -10, Temeku Hills and a portion of Chardonnay Hills, Project No. PW10 -01 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer- CIP Chris White, Assistant Engineer- CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the plans and specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009 -10, Temeku Hills and a portion of Chardonnay Hills, Project No. PW10 -01. BACKGROUND: The Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY2009 -2010, is an annual project that will utilize either Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (REAS), Tire Rubber Modified Slurry Seal (TRMSS) or Rubber Polymer Modified Slurry (RPMS) to seal the project roadways against water intrusion and deterioration of asphalt concrete pavement wearing surface. Ideally slurry seal is applied every five to seven years as it prolongs pavement life thereby delaying more costly rehabilitation measures such as asphalt concrete overlays or removal and reconstruction. Slurry sealing involves cleaning and crack sealing the existing roadway surface, applying the Slurry and restoration of pavement delineation. Staff has defined the street locations based on Pavement Management System (PMS) study recently completed, current pavement conditions, time elapsed since the last preventative maintenance measure and geographical proximity. The streets to be sealed this year are Temeku Hills and a portion of Chardonnay Hills. Project specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works' office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $469,523.00. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are in the Public Works Department Maintenance Division FY 2009 -2010 Budget for Routine Street Maintenance, Account No. 001 - 164 - 601 -5402. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Slurry Seal Streets List 2. Location Maps SLURRY SEAL STREET AREAS FY 2009 -2010 (MARCH 23,2010) AREA STREET LENGTH PAVING AREA MILES GENERAL PLAN WIDTH CLASSIFICATION BERKSHIRE LN 255.70 10,228.40 0.04 40 LOCAL COG HILL DR 249.84 9,993.60 0.04 40 LOCAL CONGRESSIONAL DR 2,210.16 88,407.60 0.38 40 LOCAL CROOKED STICK DR 710.73 28,429.20 0.13 40 LOCAL ESSEX CT 303.79 12,152.00 0.05 40 LOCAL FIRESTONE ST 852.73 34,109.60 0.15 40 LOCAL GLENEAGLES DR 1,087.88 43,516.00 0.19 40 LOCAL MEADOW BROOK WY 269.37 10,775.20 0.05 40 LOCAL OAK HILL DR 870.11 34,804.40 0.16 40 LOCAL OTTER CREEK CIR 188.12 7,524.80 0.03 40 LOCAL PINE TREE CIR 1,206.98 48,280.00 0.21 40 LOCAL ROYAL DORNOCH CT 299.81 11,992.40 0.05 40 LOCAL SEA ISLAND CT 251.29 10,051.60 0.04 40 LOCAL SEMINOLE ST 913.00 36,520.80 0.16 40 LOCAL SPYGLASS HILL LN 538.04 21,521.60 0.10 40 LOCAL SUNNINGDALE DR 1,770.67 70,827.60 0.33 40 LOCAL TEMEKU DR 4,822.81 192,913.60 0.87 40 LOCAL WINGED FOOT ST 358.31 14,332.40 0.06 40 LOCAL CANTERBURY CT 718.20 28,728.00 0.12 40 LOCAL FLAG WY 179.51 7,180.80 0.03 40 LOCAL INVERNESS CT 638.79 25,552.00 0.11 40 LOCAL LAUREL VALLEY CIR 361.40 14,456.00 0.06 40 LOCAL AREA A TOTAL 19,057.24 762,297.60 3.36 BUNKERS WY 638.95 25,558.00 0.12 40 LOCAL CASCADES CT 544.09 21,764.40 0.10 40 LOCAL COLONIAL CT 548.20 21,928.80 0.10 40 LOCAL DELMONTE ST 1,435.92 57,437.60 0.25 40 LOCAL DUNES CT 467.20 18,688.00 0.08 40 LOCAL PACIFIC GROVE WY 1,095.12 43,805.60 0.20 40 LOCAL PAR WAY 142.03 5,681.60 0.02 40 LOCAL PIN WAY 117.02 4,680.80 0.02 40 LOCAL PINE NEEDLE ST 497.85 19,914.00 0.09 40 LOCAL ROYAL BIRKDALE DR 1,911.80 76,473.20 0.35 40 LOCAL SANDHILL LN 1,847.42 73,897.60 0.33 40 LOCAL SOMERSET HILLS 321.83 12,873.60 0.05 40 LOCAL AREA B TOTAL 9,567.43 382,703.20 1.71 AREAS A, B TOTAL 28,624.67 1,145,000.80 5.07 SLURRY SEAL 2009/2010 CHARDONNAY HILLS (APRIL 5, 2010) GENERAL PLAN STREET LENGTH PAVING AREA MILES WIDTH CLASSIFICATION CERCLE BEAUREGARD 889.73 35,589.20 0.16 40 LOCAL CERCLE CHAMBERTIN 752.59 30,103.60 0.13 40 LOCAL CERCLE LATOUR 654.03 26,161.20 0.12 40 LOCAL CHEMIN CLINET 521.44 20,857.60 0.09 40 LOCAL CHEMIN COUTET 948.69 37,947.60 0.17 40 LOCAL CHEMIN LATACHE 312.07 12,482.80 0.05 40 LOCAL CHEMIN LAURENT 495.75 19,830.00 0.09 40 LOCAL CHEMIN MARGAUX 230.42 9,216.80 0.04 40 LOCAL COUR BEAUNE 556.36 22,254.40 0.10 40 LOCAL COUR MAGDELAINE 190.41 7,616.40 0.03 40 LOCAL COUR MEYNEY 524.07 20,962.80 0.09 40 LOCAL COUR POMEROL 443.35 17,734.00 0.08 40 LOCAL PLACER BELAIR 1,240.51 49,620.40 0.22 40 LOCAL PLACER CONDRIEU 263.70 10,548.00 0.04 40 LOCAL PLACER LAFITE 1,120.61 44,824.40 0.20 40 LOCAL PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS 4,533.89 199,491.16 0.79 44 COLLECTOR RUE JADOT 1,883.91 75.356.40 0.33 40 LOCAL TOTAL 15,561.53 640,596.76 2.73 Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009 -2010 Project No. PW10 -01 CT Slurry Seal 2009 -2010 Areas .A �g Centerline 0 116 290 460 690 920 Feet March 24, 2010 Thie map was part, bytle Car of Temecda Gecgmphlc Infomldion System. The map bdedsed from base data ,mduced byte RlersWe Co etyAosessoes Do admeat and the Trempodmion and Lard ManagementAgancy of Riiarsge County. The CRyofTemeaalaassumesm, v ntyor Iedalmspmsjblliybrhe Inbm gonmo inetl on tieemp. GalaadidormagonreprosentedonrMannap are subject to update and mndmrauon. no Geographic Informdion System ad dhersou should be queried forte most arrent informaflon. The map b pat ror report or male. rtlsN rem p projedstpublba,mftWuny sal ChrisehRe 2009 201 0A0 kb.natl Slurry Seal 2009/2010 Centerline Chardonnay Hills Slurry Seal Project No. PW10 -01 0 96 190 380 670 760 m Feet Al 4 3010 The map was made by the City of ToTecula Geoprepbic Ffotmetba System. The map is Carved hers base able produced W Me RivenlLe Can a tyFSssoM1 Department end Me Ttenapodetbn end land Mampant M1(gency WRirermtle County The Cityof Tertaculaassumam rt-, or lesal raponsibilky for Ne inbrmadon mn.i.d on thla mqo. Date aM lnfmmaGon represented be this map firmmsubjest he upiate end modi ,anon. The Geayrephlc iztme system and olha sour.: should be yraerbd tonne most curtest Infortnetbn. The mop Is mother m,st —sele. p pry'eem subOCxnrkmalurry seal chr's whilelo 11 cha connay hill: kL.mxd Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, Assistant City Manager DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Temecula Valley Reality Race, a Fundraiser Event for Michelle's Place (at Council Member Washington's Request) PREPARED BY: Gloria Wolnick, Economic Development Specialist II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Approve in concept the Temecula Valley Reality Race, a fundraiser event for Michelle's Place, at Council Member Washington's request;. 2. Authorize the City to co- sponsor the event and authorize staff to work out the details with the promoter; 3. Approve the use of the Temecula Community Theater to launch the event. BACKGROUND: Council Member Washington and staff met with Gillian Larson, a local resident, who participated on the show "Survivor' and Kim Goodnough, the Director of Michelle's Place to discuss a proposed fundraising event to benefit Michelle's Place Women's Breast Cancer Resource Center. Michelle's Place is a local non- profit organization serving the Temecula Valley, which provides emotional and educational support for those touched with breast cancer and facilitates breast health care services. Ms. Larson, a "reality tv show" celebrity, has connections to over 300 stars from many reality shows. Her idea is to hold a one -day event which will be similar to the reality show "The Amazing Race" (a regional scavenger hunt). The Temecula Valley Reality Rally is proposed for Spring 2011 and this "Amazing Race" type contest will incorporate and highlight many of the popular annual events held in the Temecula Valley. The event organizer is not seeking financial assistance from the City but rather City support in the form of calling The Temecula Valley Reality Rally a "co- sponsored" event for marketing purposes. Marketing must begin 9 months out as the event would involve 4- person teams of indivuduals who may elect to pay to play. Celebrity reality tv show contestants will be invited to participate on teams and stay in Temecula during the duration of the weekend. The proposal also requests for the event to originate from the Old Town Community Theater property. If the facility is needed for the event, staff recommends the event organizer to pay the applicable rental fees. The game may take contestants throughout Temecula as well as through Temecula Valley Wine Country. Per Council's direction, staff will work out the event details with the promoter and take to City Council for formal approval. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: Temecula Valley Reality Rally Draft Proposal Page 1 Temecula Valley Reality Rally Fun for Funds Proposal for an amazing event to include all that our awesome town has to offer. A Reality Fundraiser for Michelle's Place, the Cancer Resource Center planned for April 15th -17th, 2011. I was a contestant on Survivor in 2008 and have spent my past year doing charity appearances and motivational talks. I have intentionally connected with over 300 "Reality Stars" from many different shows with the Temecula event in mind. The fundraisers I have attended have all raised thousands of dollars for their charity by bringing in Reality Stars for fun and meet and greets. After all who doesn't want to meet a TV Star they have all watched. There is no other event like my idea being done and none in Southern California. I want Temecula to be the first and make it a yearly event that will draw thousands to attend, to play and pay. My intention is to add it to Temecula's yearly events. My brother of 56 died of cancer last year and I want to do something in his honor. Both he and Michelle had an amazing spirit and both died of cancer so this in their honor and Michelle's Place cause. I absolutely love our town. I would like to add my proposed event to the many other incredible events that take place in Temecula. The main purpose is to make this "our event" including as many merchants and local events as possible which will provide them with publicity as well as making this a fun "Amazing Race" type event using all of them. My intention is to have all merchant and event participants help make their "challenges and road blocks "specifically to highlight who they are. All Race participants will race in teams of 3 all around Temecula finding clues, choosing challenges and road blocks and end up running up the steps of City Hall to the final pit stop to win the race and win a prize. The teams can consist of 3 friends or 2 friends and a Reality Star. The 3 day event will consist of: Friday Evening A wine and cheese reception for a silent auction to bid on one of the Stars you want to race with. Mingle with the Stars who have already arrived and are excited about the race. Wine and Cheese provided by a vendor. Music provided by local bands. Saturday Morning A meet and greet open to the public, all Racers and the Stars. Charge at the door to meet, get autographs and photos with the Stars. Light brunch available with entrance ticket. Photographers, videographers and music. The Race starts in Old Town with the first set of clues in the game. The race will take approximately 4 hours. All Racers will be driven so there would not be a "race hazard." We all know how the Race can be won or lost by getting the right "taxi." K -Frog in Old Town will advertise the event and add to the fun. Page 2 Saturday Evening A Reality Star cocktail party for the first hour will be exclusively for the Race winners and an awards presentation will follow. There will be hors d'oevers and cash bar party for all Racers, Stars, organizers and volunteers. A silent auction will be held which will provide additional funding to cover cost of the event. Items will be donated by merchants and Reality Stars. The evening will include music, MC for the event, photographers and a videographer for the entire evening. Sunday Morning "Breakfast with the Stars" for the winners of the Reality Raffle held throughout the event. Raffle winners (4 winners and their families) will be announced at the awards evening. Income generating ideas: Corporate and business sponsorships Get donations to offset cost of event through cash, in -kind or donated product or service. Sponsorship for advertising in all "Weekend with the Stars "program My goal is to have as many participants to donate their services or product for the exposure and advertising. All monies raised will cover the costs of the event and all remaining money will be donated to Michelle's Place. The inclusion of venues /events offered in Temecula, the restaurant exposure and publicity plus all the visitors that the event will bring, everyone will be a winner... not only the Race winner. Racing fees. This will be ?? $150pp for all the weekend events. Silent auction to raise money to race with a "Star." Participant merchants pay to have their establishment included. Sale of event tee shirts. Sale of event buffs. Sale of advertising space in "Weekend with the Stars" program. Saturday morning meet and greet ticket sales. Raffle for "Breakfast with the Stars." Silent Auction at Awards evening. Ticket sales for awards evening meet and greet for non participants of Rally. Ticket for non Racers - $60.00 pp Ticket price for organizers and volunteers- $40 Sale of "Photos with a Star." Sale of a "Weekend with the Stars" video. Page 3 Expenses Travel costs for the "Stars" Flight or gas. Hotel accommodations. Comped for the Stars. Hotels could have a special rate for all others coming in for the event. I have some fun ideas for "Survive the Weekend" hotel promotions. Wine and Cheese "Silent Auction for a Star." Meet and Greet Brunch. Race prize for 1t place winners. Awards evening - facility costs and horsdoevers. Photographers and videographers Bands Gas for "Rally drivers" Producing event tee shirts Buying Buffs. Printing "Weekend with the Stars" program Printing event clues Flyers to hand out and post Posters for advertising all over town. Tickets for Saturday meet and greet. All other tickets will be "E" tickets. Advertising A Reality Star float in the 4th of July parade with some local "Stars" Flyers Posters in local businesses. Webpage for the event, Temecula's website, event organizer's website. Local TV CBS 8 San Diego Los Angeles TV station K -Frog and other radio stations Reality TV websites. Newspapers Advertise at other Temecula events throughout the year. Flyers distributed at other Reality Star events that event organizer attends throughout the year. Flyers at Storm baseball games I will get the Reality Stars on board. Stars that already do a lot of charity appearances and "big names "will get first preference for paid expenses. Page 4 Invites to Play and Participate General public Police, EMT's, Fire Dept., fitness centers, City officials, wineries, local servicemen, Postural Solutions, car dealers, South African Club, Moms Club, San Diego Rugby Club, homeowners communities, Storm team, Padres team, and local small businesses. Also, hotels, Maters Swim Club, aqua exercise groups, boot camps, area colleges and universities, Susan G. Komen volunteers, Temecula City employees, lifeguards, City volunteers and Valley Biggest Loser contestants. Challenges and Road Blocks To Include Rod Run, Western Days, Temecula Theater, wine country, sidewalk painters, quilt makers, Letters from Home Memorial, Japanese and Dutch sister cities , Fire Dept, Blue Grass Festival, hot air balloon companies, Balloon & Wine Festival, Children's Museum, Luisinio Tribe / Pechanga, Temecula Valley Film Festival, local ethnic/ cultural merchants, restaurants, Old Town Temecula Market Assoc, and Stampede. More to be added as thoughts and plans arise "Do you have what it takes to beat a Reality Star at their own game ?" " Race with the Rest and Beat the Best !!!" Thank you. I look forward to bringing another fun and profitable event to our awesome town. Gillian Larson 781 - 962 -8234 www.gillianlarson.com Item No. I I Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Transfer and Appropriation of Funds for the Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement Project PREPARED BY: Cathy McCarthy, Community Services Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the transfer of Capital Improvement Program funds from the Temecula City Entry Monumentation project and appropriate $150,000 for the design and installation of the Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement project. BACKGROUND: The City Council approved a project for City Entry Monumentation in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2009 -10. Due to a developer delay, the monument project will be constructed at a later date. As a result, staff is requesting the funding for the monument project be appropriated to the new Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement Project. The Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement Project will design and install irrigation and landscape in the right -of -way to enhance Margarita Road from Ramsy Court to Avenida Cimadel Sol. This area has no consistent landscaping and is in need of improvement. These funds will be used for this new project, which will be including in the CIP for Fiscal Year 2010 -11. FISCAL IMPACT: Transfer Capital Reserves in the Capital Improvement Program from the Temecula City Entry Monumentation project and appropriate $150,000 for the Margarita Road Right of Way Enhancement Project. ATTACHMENTS: None TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Item No. 12 ACTION MINUTES of APRIL 27, 2010 City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING The Temecula Community Services District Meeting convened at 7:30 PM. CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR 10 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) — Director Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Director Edwards and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Director Roberts who abstained RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the action minutes of April 13, 2010. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGERS REPORT 1 CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:32 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 11, 2010, at 5:30 PM., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk /District Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 13 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Second Amendment with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the Second Amendment with Computer Alert Systems, Inc. for Alarm Monitoring, Inspection, and Repair Services in the amount of $25,000.00 for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Alarm Monitoring, Inspection and Repair Services on March 20, 2008. TCSD received three (3) proposals, which were evaluated to determine the qualifications and competitiveness of each Vendor to provide Alarm Monitoring, Inspection and Repair Services. Central Security Services was the lowest bidder, but withdrew their proposal because they could not meet all of the RFP requirements. Computer Alert Systems, Inc. was determined to be the second lowest qualified bidder to provide the required services for Alarm Monitoring, Inspection and Repair Services. A one (1) year Contract with the option of three (3) one -year extensions was awarded to Computer Alert Systems, Inc., effective July 1, 2008 thru June 30, 2009 in the amount of $37,700.00. The First Amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $22,700.00. The Second Amendment is now requested to authorize the second one (1) year extension as permitted per original contract. The cost to provide alarm monitoring, inspection and repair services for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 is $20,640.00 and an estimated $4,360.00 is being requested for repairs and additional supplemental services. This additional year of service will increase the total contract amount to $85,400.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the alarm monitoring, inspection and repair services contract is $25,000.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter \temp \966573.docx ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No. 2 Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966573. docx SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS, INC FOR FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS MONITORING THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Computer Alert Systems, Inc, a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2008 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Alarm Monitoring, Inspection and Repair Services ", in the amount of $37,700.00. b. The first amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $22,700.00 C. Following a competitive Request for Proposal process, the parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $25,000.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($25,000.00) for additional alarm monitoring, inspection and repair services for a total Agreement amount of Eighty Five Thousand Four Hundred Dollars and no Cents ($85,400.00)." 4. Section 22 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966574. docx Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please ca11951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966574. docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Chuck Washington, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Computer Alert Systems, Inc. (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Michael C. Lynch, President Norma C. Duarte, Office Manager CONSULTANT Computer Alert System, Inc. Michael C. Lynch 27570 Commerce Center Dr. Suite 119 (951) 676 -6880 Temecula CA. 92590 FSM Initials: Date: C�rogrzm FilesW eevia.COm0000ment Converter tempA966574.docx ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE PRICING SHEET FACILITY LOCATION Monthly Fee Monthly Fee Yearly Total Fee Per Fire System Security Location Monitoring & System Monitoring & Inspection Monitoring Inspection City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Maintenance Facility, 43210 Business Park Drive $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Mary Phillips Senior Center, 418456 th Street $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Temecula Valley Museum, 28314 Mercedes Drive $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Temecula Children's Museum, 42801 Main Street $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Old Town Community Theater 42051 Main Street $80.00 $40.00 $1,440.00 Temecula Public Library 30600 Pauba Rd. $100.00 $40.00 $1,680.00 Patricia Birdsall Sports Park 31621 Deer Hollow Way $80.00 $40.00 $1,440.00 Temecula Wedding Chapel, 28300 Mercedes Drive $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966574. docx ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED 6 th Street Restroom /Parking Lot, 40% HOURLY RATE PER REGULAR MAN HOUR -8am To 419526 th Street N/A $40.00 $480.00 Police Sub - station, $95.00 Old Town Front Street N/A $40.00 $480.00 28410 Old Town Front Street, # 105 Field Operations Center 43230 Business Park Drive $80.00 $40.00 $1,440.00 Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station $80.00 $55.00 $1,620.00 * Civic Center Main St. $55.00 $40.00 $1,140.00 Civic Center Parking Garage Mercedes St. $55.00 N/A $660.00 RRSP Skate Park 30875 Rancho Vista Rd. N/A $40.00 $480.00 Temecula Community Center — S.A.F.E. Building $55.00 N/A $660.00 Pujol St. $20,640.00 Total *Supplemental Service ALTERNATE BID ITEMS -For repair or extra work authorized by City MARK -UP ADDED TO VENDOR'S WHOLESALE PRICE OF PARTS & EQUIPMENT 40% HOURLY RATE PER REGULAR MAN HOUR -8am To 5pm Monday through Friday $75.00 HOURLY RATE PER OVERTIME MAN HOUR- After- hours, Weekends, Holidays, etc. $95.00 Contractor's Signature Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966574. docx Item No. 14 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Third Amendment to the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services Agreement with West Coast Arborists, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011 PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the Third Amendment with West Coast Arborists, Inc. in the amount of $50,000.00 for Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011. BACKGROUND: In March 26, 2007 the Public Works Department sent a Request for Proposal (RFP) and specifications for the Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services to twenty (20) tree trimming contractors. On April 18, 2007, seven (7) proposals were received for tree trimming maintenance services, which were evaluated to determine the qualifications and competitiveness of each Vendor to provide tree trimming maintenance services. The Temecula Community Services District utilized the Public Works Department RFP and entered into a (1) year Agreement with option of three (3) one -year extensions with West Coast Arborists, Inc. effective July 10, 2007 thru June 30, 2008, in the amount of $100,000.00 for Citywide Tree Trimming Maintenance Services. The First Amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $50,000.00. The Second Amendment was approved on June 9, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $50,000.00. The Third and Final Amendment is now requested to authorize the final one (1) year extension as permitted per original contract. The cost to provide tree trimming maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 is $50,000.00.This additional year of service will increase the total contract amount to $250,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the tree trimming maintenance services contract is $50,000.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year2010- 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No. 3 Agenda Report West Coast 2010- 2011.doc THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. FOR CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and West Coast Arborists, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 10, 2007 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Citywide Tree Maintenance Services ", in the amount of $100,000.00. b. The first amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $50,000.00 C. The second amendment was approved on June 9, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $50,000.00 d. The parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $50,000.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Third Amendment amount shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($50,000.00) for additional Citywide Tree Maintenance Services for a total Agreement amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($250,000.00)." 4. Section 24 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966580. doc "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please ca11951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966580. doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Chuck Washington, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: West Coast Arborists, Inc. (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Patrick Mahoney, President Richard Mahoney, Assistant Secretary Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR West Coast Arborists, Inc. Contact Person: Patrick Mahoney 2200 E. Via Burton Street Anaheim, CA 92806 Phone: (714) 991 -1900 Fax: (714) 956-3745 FSM Initials: Date: Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966580. doc 3 ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA CITYWIDE TREE MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010 - 2011 Based on Approximately 7,500 Trees in Various Locations throughout the City of Temecula SERVICE UNIT PRICE UNIT DESCRIPTION STREET TREE TRIMMING - CLEARANCE TRIM $ 20.50 EACH STREET TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - FULL TRIM $ 50.00 EACH SLOPE TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - AERIAL UNIT $ 67.50 EACH SLOPE TREE AESTHETIC TRIMMING - CLIMBER $ 80.00 EACH PALM TREE TRIMMING $ 25.00 EACH COMPLETE TREE & STUMP REMOVAL $ 18.00 DIAMETER INCH STUMP REMOVAL $ 6.00 DIAMETER INCH ROOT PRUNING WITHOUT ROOT BARRIER $ 50.00 EACH ROOT PRUNING WITH ROOT BARRIER $100.00 EACH (10'x 18' DEEP ROOT OR EQUIVALENT) TREE PLANTING: 15 GAL. W /ROOT BARRIER $ 145.00 EACH 15 GAL. W/O ROOT BARRIER $ 120.00 EACH 24 INCH BOX W /ROOT BARRIER $ 225.00 EACH 24 INCH BOX W/O ROOT BARRIER $ 200.00 EACH TREE WATERING $ 400.00 DAY CREW RENTAL - 3 MEN, AERIAL UNIT, DUMP $120.00 HOUR TRUCK & CHIPPER CREW RENTAL - 2 MEN, AERIAL UNIT, DUMP $ 80.00 HOUR TRUCK & CHIPPER CREW RENTAL - 1 MEN $ 40.00 HOUR EMERGENCY WORK CALL OUT - 3 MEN $240.00 HOUR INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY EQUIPMENT, DISPOSAL FEES, & ZERO MATERIAL MARK - UP Contractor's Signature Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966580. doc Item No. 15 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Third Amendment with Arch Chemicals, Inc. formerly Marine Biochemists for Water Management/Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011 PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the Third Amendment with Arch Chemicals, Inc. formerly Marine Biochemist, in the amount of $46,800.00 for Water Management/Maintenance Services at the Harveston Lake Park and Temecula Duck Pond for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Water Management/Maintenance Services for Harveston Lake Park and Temecula Duck Pond on March 20, 2008. TCSD received three (3) proposals, which were evaluated to determine the qualifications and competitiveness of each Vendor to provide Water Management/Maintenance Services. Arch Chemicals, Inc. formerly Marine Biochemist was determined to have provided the most qualified proposal for the Water Management/Maintenance Services. A one (1) year Contract with the option of three (3) one -year extensions was awarded to Arch Chemicals, Inc. effective July 1, 2008 thru June 30, 2009 in the amount of $83,200.00. The First Amendment was approved on October 9, 2008 in order to change the Company name. Marine Biochemist was changed to Arch Chemicals, Inc. The Second Amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $68,260.00. The Third Amendment is now requested to authorize the third one (1) year extension as permitted per original contract. The cost to provide water management/maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011 is $46,800.00. This additional year of service will increase the total contract amount to $198,260.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the water management /maintenance services contract is $46,800.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budgets for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No. 3 Arch Chemicals, Inc Third Amendment 2010- 2011.doc THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. FOR WATER MANAGEMENT /MAINTENANCE SERVICES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Arch Chemicals, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On May 27, 2008 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Water Management/Maintenance Services ", in the amount of $83,200.00. b. The first amendment was approved on October 9, 2008 in order to change the Company name, Marine Biochemist was changed to Arch Chemicals, Inc. C. The second amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $68,260.00. d. The parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $46,800.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Third Amendment amount shall not exceed Forty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and no Cents ($46,800.00) for additional water management/maintenance services for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Ninety Eight Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars and no Cents ($198,260.00)." 4. Section 22 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966576. docx "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please ca11951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula. CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966576. docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES Arch Chemicals. Inc., formally Marine DISTRICT Biochemists (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Chuck Washington, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: By: Steven C. Giuliano VP & CEO Louis S. Massimo, Executive VP & COO CONTRACTOR Arch Chemicals, Inc. Contact Person: Bill Thomas 2940 B East La Jolla St Anaheim, CA 92806 Phone: (714)632 -5253 FSM Initials: Date: Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966576. docx 3 ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE PRICING SHEET ALTERNATE BID ITEMS — for emergency repairs or extra work authorized by City MARK -UP ADDED TO VENDOR'S WHOLESALE PRICE OF PRICE PRICE 15% PER PER DESCRIPTION MONTH YEAR *Harveston Lake Park Weekends, Holidays, etc. $95.00 To be serviced three times per $3,975.00 $47,700.00 week (Monday, Wednesday & Friday) Harveston Lake Park To be serviced twice a week $3,300.00 $39,600.00 (Tuesday & Friday) *Temecula Duck Pond To be services three times per $880.00 $10,560.00 week (Monday, Wednesday & Friday) Temecula Duck Pond To be serviced twice a week $600.00 $7,200.00 (Tuesday & Friday) ALTERNATE BID ITEMS — for emergency repairs or extra work authorized by City MARK -UP ADDED TO VENDOR'S WHOLESALE PRICE OF PARTS, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS 15% HOURLY RATE PER REGULAR MAN HOUR (8am TO 5pm Monday through Friday $65.00 HOURLY RATE PER OVERTIME MAN HOUR — After - hours, Weekends, Holidays, etc. $95.00 *Supplemental Service Contractor's Signature Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966576. docx Item No. 16 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Fourth Amendment with Prudential Overall Supply Inc., for Uniform, Floor Mat, Dust Mop and Towel Cleaning /Rental Services Agreement for Fiscal Year 2010- 2011 PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the Fourth Amendment with Prudential Overall Supply Inc. in the amount of $25,000.00 for Uniform, Floor Mat and Towel Cleaning /Rental Service for Fiscal Year 2010 - 2011. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Uniform, Floor Mat, Dust Mop and Towel Cleaning /Rental Services on April 14, 2006. The TCSD received several proposals, which were evaluated to determine the qualifications and competitiveness of their pricing. Prudential Overall Supply Inc. was determined to be the lowest qualified bidder for the required services. A two year contract with the option of (3) one -year extensions was awarded to Prudential Overall Supply Inc. effective July 1, 2006 thru June 30, 2008 in the amount of $25,000.00. The First Amendment was approved on May 22, 2007 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00. The Second Amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00. The Third Amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00. The Fourth and Final Amendment is now requested to authorize the final one (1) year extension, as permitted per the original contract. The cost to provide uniform, floor mat, dust mop and towel cleaning /rental services for fiscal year 2010 -2011 is $20,521.84 and an estimated $4,478.16 is being requested for additional supplemental services. The cost to provide services for fiscal year 2010 -2011 is $25,000.00. The additional year of service will increase the total contract amount to $125,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the uniform, floor mat and towel cleaning /rental services contract is $25,000.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budgets for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No. 4 Agenda Report Prudential 2010- 2011.doc FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY, INC. FOR UNIFORM, FLOOR MAT, DUST MOP AND TOWEL CLEANING /RENTAL SERVICES THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Prudential Overall Supply, Inc., a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2006 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Uniform, Floor Mat, Dust Mop and Towels Cleaning /Rental Services ", in the amount of $25,000.00 b. The first amendment was approved on May 22, 2007 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00 C. The second amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00 d. The third amendment was approved on May 12, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $25,000.00 e. The parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $25,000.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: 'The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Fourth Amendment amount shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($25,000.00) for uniform, floor mat, dust mop and towels cleaning /rental Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc services for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and no Cents ($125,000.00)." 4. Section 14 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please ca11951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula. CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: By: TCSD Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Prudential Overall Supply, Inc. (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Scott Chafin, General Manager Nick Miranda, Sales & Service Manager By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Contractor Prudential Overall Supply, Inc. Contact Person: Scott Chafin P.O. Box 11210 Santa Anna, CA 92711 Phone: (714) 231 -9645 FSM Initials: Date: Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc 3 Location Qty CITY HALL 3 3 2 10 20 PU_110 Y 0:4 01_10163= Size /Item 4x6 mat (charcoal; 3x5 mat (teal) 24" dust mop 3X5 Mat (gray) Towels (blue) FACILITY 1 4x6 mat (teal) 4 3x5 mat (teal) 1 24" dust mop 10 Towels (white) OLD TOWN TEMECULA SENIOR CENTER 3 4x6 mats (charcoal) 1 36" dust mop 4 3X5 mats (charcoal) 20 Towels (blue) ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" Unit Price V $2.90 $1.80 $0.66 $1.80 $0.10 Total $2.90 $1.80 $0.66 $0.10 Total $2.90 $0.86 $1.80 $0.10 Wkly Price $8.70 $5.40 $1.32 $18.00 $2.00 $35.42 $2.90 $7.20 $0.66 $1.00 $11.76 $8.70 $0.86 $7.20 $2.00 $9.26 Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc 4 Annual $1,841.84 $611.52 $975.52 $866.32 $481.52 $18.76 TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER 3 4x6 mats (blue) $2.90 $8.70 1 3x5 mat (blue) $1.80 $1.80 1 3x10 mat (blue) $3.30 $3.30 1 36" dust mop $0.86 $0.86 20 Towels (white) $0.10 $2.00 $16.66 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM 2 4x6 mat (tan) $2.90 $5.80 1 3x5 mat (tan) $1.80 $1.80 1 24" dust mop $0.66 $0.66 10 Towels (white) $0.10 $1.00 $9.26 Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc 4 Annual $1,841.84 $611.52 $975.52 $866.32 $481.52 EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED �i�L�tlPd�l�lYrt ■ :7xd :7�_��Nl� CENTER 5 4x6 mat (gray) $2.90 $14.50 3x10 mats (gray) 3 3x5 mat (gray) $1.80 $5.40 20 2 36" dust mop $0.86 $1.72 2 48" dust mop $1.26 $2.52 40 Towels (white) $0.10 $4.00 $28.14 $1,463.28 PERFORMING ARTS & MERCANTILE BUILDINGS 10 4x6 mat (gray) $2.90 $29.00 3 3x5 mat (gray) $1.80 $5.40 2 36" dust mop $0.86 $1.72 2 48" dust mop $1.26 $2.52 50 Towels (white) $0.10 $5.00 $43.64 $2,269.28 CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 3 4x6 mats (charcoal) $2.90 $8.70 1 36" dust mop $0.86 $0.86 4 3X5 mats (charcoal) $1.80 $7.20 20 Towels (blue) $0.10 $2.00 $18.76 PUBLIC LIBRARY 4 4x6 mats (gray) $2.90 $11.60 2 3x5 mats (gray) $1.80 $3.60 I70Z63 4 3x5 mats (gray) 1 4x6 mats (gray) 1 3x10 mats (gray) 1 48" dust mop 1 36" dust mop 20 Towels $1.80 $2.90 $3.30 $1.26 $0.86 $0.10 Total for Facilities Ct rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument Convertertemp \966594. doc $15.20 $7.20 $2.90 $3.30 $1.26 $0.86 $2.00 $17.52 5 $975.52 $790.40 $911.04 $11,186.24 Location Qty Community Services 12 Workers 60 Size /Item Dark Brown Pants Orange or White Shirt Long or Short Sleeve EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED Unit Price $0.90 Price $54.00 Annual $54.00 $2,808.00 "Miscellaneous Fees" Not To Exceed -100 Ball caps $8,10 ea $810.00 $3,618.00 Public Works 13 Workers 65 Dark Brown Pants $0.90 $58.50 Orange Shirts Long or Short Sleeve $58.50 $3,042.00 "Miscellaneous Fees" Not To Exceed $ 810.00 $ 3,852.00 ANNUAL TOTAL - CUSTODIAL & UNIFORMS $ 20,521.84 *City has choice of pants -Blue Jeans @ $.75 each per week or Brown pants @ $.50 each per week Contractor's Signature Cr rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966594. doc 6 Item No. 17 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Fourth Amendment to the Janitorial Services Agreement for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters with Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the Fourth Amendment with Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC for $63,780.00 to provide Janitorial Services for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Park Restroom and Park Shelter Janitorial Maintenance Services on March 26, 2007. The TCSD received three (3) proposals, which were evaluated to determine qualifications and to assess the competitiveness of their pricing. Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Services, Inc. was determined to be the lowest qualified bidder for the required services. A one (1) year Contract with the option of three (3) one -year extensions was awarded to Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Services, Inc. effective July 1, 2007 thru June 30, 2008 in the amount of $70,548.00. The First Amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $63,780.00. The Second Amendment was approved on May 8, 2009 in order to change the Company name. Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Services, Inc. was changed to Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC. The Third Amendment was approved on June 9, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $63,780.00. The Fourth and final Amendment is now requested to authorize the final one (1) year extension as permitted per the original contract. The cost to provide janitorial maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 is $63,780.00. This additional year of service will increase the total contract amount to $261,888.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the janitorial maintenance services for Park Restrooms and Picnic Shelters is $63,780.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No. 4 R:VSIRE REPORTS ET ALUVlaintenancel g end a Repaor2010- 20111Environmenta l Cleaning Solutions 2010.2011. doc FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANING SOLUTIONS & FACILITY MANAGEMENT, LLC FOR PARK RESTROOMS AND PICNIC SHELTERS JANITORIAL SERVICES THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2007 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Janitorial Maintenance Services ", in the amount of $70,548.00. b. The first amendment was approved on May 27, 2008 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $63,780.00. C. The second amendment was approved on May 8, 2009 in order to change the Company name. Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Services Inc., was changed to Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC pursuant to the name and ownership change of said company in May 9, 2009. d. The third amendment was approved on June 9, 2009 in order to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $63,780.00. e. The parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $63,780.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: 'The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Fourth Amendment amount CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\966578.doc shall not exceed Sixty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Eighty Dollars and no Cents ($63,780.00) for additional janitorial maintenance services for a total Agreement amount of Two Hundred Sixty One Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty Eight Dollars and no Cents (261,888.00) ". 4. Section 22 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please ca11951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula. CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\966578.doc 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility DISTRICT Management, LLC (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Chuck Washington, TCSD President ATTEST: By: By: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Dan R. Yasui, President /CEO By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Contractor Environmental Cleaning Solutions & Facility Management, LLC Contact Person: Dan R. Yasui 19881 Brookhurst St. Suite C - 303 Huntington Beach, CA 92646 Phone: (714) 231 -9645 FSM Initials: Date: CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter \temp\966578.doc 3 ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE PRICING SHEET PARK NAME / RESTROOM LOCATION ADDRESS PRICE PER MONTH PRICE PER YEAR Sam Hicks Monument Park 41970 Moreno Road $188.00 $2,256.00 6 th Street Parking Lot Restroom 41952 Sixth Street $188.00 $2,256.00 Pala Community Park 44900 Temecula Lane $188.00 $2,256.00 Ronald Reagan Sports Park (Rancho Vista field) 30875 Rancho Vista Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Skate Park Restroom (At Ronald Reagan Sports Park) 42569 Margarita Road $188.00 $2,256.00 North /South Restroom (At Ronald Reagan Sports Park) 42775 Margarita Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park 31465 Via Cordoba $188.00 $2,256.00 Paloma Del Sol Park 32099 De Portola Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Harveston Lake Park (Boat House Restroom) 40233 Village Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Harveston Lake Park (Playground Restroom) 40233 Village Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Temeku Hills Park (Playground Restroom) 31367 La Serena $188.00 $2,256.00 Temeku Hills Park (Snack Bar Restroom) 31367 La Serena $188.00 $2,256.00 Temecula Duck Pond 28250 Ynez Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Winchester Creek Park 39950 Margarita Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Margarita Community Park 29119 Margarita Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Meadows Park 43110 Meadows Parkway $188.00 $2,256.00 Pauba Ridge Park 33405 Pauba Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Crowne Hill Park 33203 Old Kent Road $188.00 $2,256.00 Temecula Elementary School Pool Restroom 41951 Moraga Road $188.00 $2,256.00 CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter \temp\966578.doc ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED Harveston Community Park (Community Room 28582 Harveston Drive $188.00 $2,256.00 Restroom) Harveston Community Park (Snack Bar 28582 Harveston Drive $188.00 $2,256.00 Restroom) Patricia H. Birdsall Sport Park ( Snack Bar 31621 Deer Hollow Way $188.00 $2,256.00 Restroom) Patricia H. Birdsall Sport Park (Playground 31621 Deer Hollow Way $188.00 $2,256.00 Restroom) Wolf Creek Park 45898 Wolf Creek Drive North $188.00 $2,256.00 SUBTOTAL A $4,700 $56,400 Contractor's Sig CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\966578.doc ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED GAZEBO /PICNIC SHELTER MAINTENANCE ADDRESS PRICE PER MONTH PRICE PER YEAR Sam Hicks Monument Park (1 Shelter) 41970 Moreno Road $25.00 $300.00 Harveston Community Park (priced as three shelters 28582 Harveston Drive $70.00 $840.00 Harveston Lake Tot Lot (priced as two shelters) 40233 Village Road $50.00 $600.00 Harveston Lake Wedding Gazebo (1 shelter) 40233 Village Road $25.00 $300.00 Winchester Creek Park (2 Shelters) 39950 Margarita Road $50.00 $600.00 Rancho California Sports Park (1 Shelter) 41569 Margarita Road $25.00 $300.00 Meadows Park (2 Shelters) 43110 Meadows Parkway $50.00 $600.00 Pauba Ridge Park (2 Shelters) 33405 Pauba Road $50.00 $600.00 Crown Hill Park 1 Shelter 33203 Old Kent Road $25.00 $300.00 Pala Community Park (3 Shelters) 44900 Temecula Lane $70.00 $840.00 Margarita Community Park (2 Shelters) 29119 Margarita Road $50.00 $600.00 Temecula Duck Pond (1 Shelter) 28250 Rancho California Road $25.00 $300.00 Temeku Hills Park (1 Shelter) 31367 La Serena Way $25.00 $300.00 Patricia H. Birdsall Sport Park (Snack Bar Tables) 31621 Deer Hollow Way $50.00 $600.00 Wolf Creek Park (1 Shelter) 45898 Wolf Creek Drive North $25.00 $300.00 SUBTOTAL B $615 $7,380 RESTROOM MAINTENANCE AND GAZEBO /PICNIC SHELTER MAINTENANCE GRAND TOTAL (Subtotal A $5,315 $63,780 +B) Contractor's Sig CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\966578.doc ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CONTINUED ADDITIONAL SERVICE ITEMS DESCRIPTION SCOPE OF WORK PRICE PER PRICE PER MONTH YEAR Maintain an additional park May be added to contract as new restroom, which will include men facilities are constructed. More than and women areas, totaling one restroom building may be approximately 500 s.f. to 900s.f. added during contract term. Maintain per above $188.00 $2,256 Specifications /Scope of Work, Exhibit A above. Provide Supplemental Restroom Provide Staff to clean and stock Maintenance Services for park restroom facility (both men and Special Events. women restrooms) hourly rate. Per Exhibit "A' Daily Requirements. $25.00 Provide General Janitorial Provide Specified general janitorial Maintenance Services maintenance services, such as cleaning office areas, kitchens, office or recreation building restrooms, hallways, multipurpose $25.00 rooms, etc. Contractor's Sig CAProgram Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp\966578.doc Item No. 18 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the HVAC Maintenance Services Agreement with Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering for Heating and Air Conditioning Services for Flscal Year 2010 -2011 PREPARED BY: Jerzy Kanigowski, Facility Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors: 1. Approve the First Amendment with Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering for Heating and Air Conditioning Maintenance Services in the amount of $66,112.00 for Fiscal Year 2010 — 2011. BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for HVAC Preventative Maintenance and Repair Services on April 6, 2009. The TCSD received twelve (12) proposals, which were evaluated to determine the qualification and competitiveness of each Vendor to provide Heating and Air Conditioning Maintenance Services and Repairs. A one (1) year Contract with option of three (3) one -year extension was awarded to Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering effective July 1, 2009 thru June 30, 2010 in the amount of $55,825.00. The First Amendment is now requested to authorize the first one (1) year extension as permitted per original contract. The cost to provide Heating and Air Conditioning Maintenance Services for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 is $26,112.00 and an estimated $40,000.00 is being requested for repairs and additional supplemental services. This additional year of services will increase the total contract amount to $121,937.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The coast of the HVAC Maintenance Services contract is $66,112.00. Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed Annual Operating Budget for FY 2010 — 2011 in the appropriate expenditure accounts. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Amendment No.1 HVAC Alpha Machanical Service & Engineering 2010 - 2011.doc FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ALPHA MECHANICAL SERVICE & ENGINEERING, INC FOR HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING SERVICE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2010 by and between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering, Inc, a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On June 9, 2009 the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Heating and Air Conditioning Maintenance Services ", in the amount of $55,825.00. b. The parties now desire to extend the term and increase the payment of the Agreement in the amount of $66,112.00, as well as, revise the Written Notice section to notify Contractor of the Temecula City Hall address change effective date and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2011 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement." 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: "The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed Sixty Six Thousand One Hundred Twelve Dollars and no Cents ($66,112.00) for heating and air conditioning maintenance services for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Twenty One Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Seven Dollars and no Cents ($121,937.00)." 4. Section 24 of the Agreement entitled "WRITTEN NOTICE" is hereby amended to read as follows: "Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party Under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) C1 rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966614. doc mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service of United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: Use this Address for a Delivery Service Or Hand - Deliveries ONLY City of Temecula Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 9033 Temecula. CA 92589 -9033 City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula. CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please call 951 - 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: City of Temecula Attn: Temecula Community Services District 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590" 5. Exhibit "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. C1 rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966614. doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Chuck Washington, TCSD President ATTEST: By: Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk /Board Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering, Inc. (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR C1 rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966614. doc Alpha Mechanical Service & Engineering, Inc Contact Person: Egan James 4885 Greencraig Lane San Diego, CA 92123 Phone: (858) 279 -1300 FSM Initials: Date: ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" CITY OF TEMECULA PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE PRICING SHEET HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE DESCRIPTION PRICE PER VISIT" RICE PER YEAR CITY HALL HVAC $1,075.00 $3,225.00 MAINTENANCE FACILITY HVAC $262.00 $786.00 FOC. FIELD OPERATIONS CENTER HVAC $283.00 $849.00 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER HVAC $800.00 $2,400.00 TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC $120.00 $360.00 MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER HVAC $235.00 $705.00 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM HVAC $150.00 $450.00 CHAPEL OF MEMORIES HVAC $50.00 $150.00 TEMECULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM HVAC $201.00 $603.00 FIRE STATION 84 HVAC $211.00 $633.00 FIRE STATION 92 HVAC $292.00 $876.00 FIRE STATION 73 HVAC $58.00 $174.00 "FIRE STATION 95 HVAC $58.00 $174.00 HARVESTON COMMUNITY PARK HVAC $72.00 $216.00 OLD TOWN COMMUNITY THEATER HVAC $299.00 $897.00 TEMECULA VALLEY LIBRARY HVAC $729.00 $2,187.00 PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL PARK HVAC $133.00 $399.00 TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER "B" HVAC $97.00 $291.00 OLD TOWN AUDIO CABINETS HVAC $150.00 $450.00 "CIVIC CENTER PARKING GARAGE $305.00 $915.00 C1 rogram Files\Neevia. ComVDocument ConvertertempA966614. doc ATTACHMENT "A" EXHIBIT "B" (Continued) ** CIVIC CENTER TOWN SQUARE * Three visits per fiscal year ** Future Service Site $3,124.00 I $9,372.00 ALTERNATE BID ITEMS -For repair or extra work authorized by City MARK -UP ADDED TO CONTRACTOR'S WHOLESALE PRICE OF PARTS & EQUIPMENT 25% HOURLY RATE PER REGUALR MAN HOUR -8am To 5pm $80.00 Monday through Friday HOURLY RATE PER OVERTIME MAN HOUR - After - hours, $120.00 Weekends, Holidays, etc. Contractor's Signature: C1 rogram Files\Neevia. Com0ocument ConvertertempA966614. doc $26,112.00 DISTRICT BUSINESS Item No. 19 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager /Board of Directors FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Old Town Gymnasium Conceptual Master Plan PREPARED BY: Cathy McCarthy, Community Services Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the Old Town Gymnasium Conceptual Master Plan. BACKGROUND: In July 2007, WLC Architects, Inc. was awarded a contract for the design of the Old Town Gymnasium to be located adjacent to the Boys and Girls Club on Pujol Street. WLC led a project committee through a process to develop a conceptual design. The committee consisted of Mayor Jeff Comerchero, Council Member Chuck Washington, Community Services Commissioner Jim Meyler, Boys and Girls Club staff and City staff. The conceptual design proposes an 8,300 square foot building including a full -sized basketball court with seating for approximately 120 spectators, restroom, a small office, storage and parking. The facility will provide additional opportunities for activities and athletics for City residents and the Boys and Girls Club, in an area currently void of these opportunities. The Community Services Commission approved the Old Town Gymnasium Conceptual Plan in its substantial form at their meeting February 8, 2010. This evening a presentation will be made by the City's consultant, WLC Architects, Inc. on the proposed gymnasium. Once approved by the Board of Directors, our consultant will begin to develop plans and specifications for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The design of the Old Town Gymnasium project is currently budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 and construction in Fiscal Years 2011 -12 and 2012 -13. ATTACHMENTS: Site Plan Floor Plan Perspective Illustrations r 30' 15' 0' 30' 60' SCALE: 1" = 30' -0" Old Town Gym City of Temecula 01 -22 -10 SITE PLAN WLC A r c h i t e c t s I n c. Rancho Cucamonga Office: 10470 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -3754 Folsom Office: 1110 Iron Point Road, Suite 200 Folsom, CA 95630 -8301 Emeryville Office: 1250 45th Street, Suite 150 Emeryville, CA 94608 A.3 LO ti co I LO (a-- O� 1 1.2 2 3 A5.1 7' -5" 8' -9" 9' -3" 20' -0" 10' -0" 1 10' -0" L I I COVERED WALKWAY COLUMNS, TYP \l In I I TT n I � n 7 n 7 II II I I lilt � a, II II II II II II II Il -lul II II II -- STO I� � 103A 103 I � � 60 SF 149 SF II I III �I HORIZONTAL OPENING DOOR, TYP III III III �I III � �1I N I � �IIII �I II � A5.1 4 fl= I= III If 1 6' - 011 I L III � Ilia � �I II � II � II � III � II � 1 7' - 5" 4 5 5.2 10' -0" 10' -0" 3' -0" 7 COVERED WALKWAY COLUMNS, TYP t I IF -1 T -t- -- 1 IF 1- IR I I f i II II II II II I I I I II I II II II II II II II II II II II II I I II II II II II II II II II II II I II 15' -0" WALL MOUNTED GREEN SCREEN TRELLIS SYSTEM. TYP MET STUD WALL FRAMING, TYP GYMNASIUM 6140 SF C, Ll H CH 0 0 N H H L-1 18' -0" VVI-%L_L_ IVI\JVIV I LL/ VI\LLIV SCREEN TRELLIS SYSTEM, TYP 20' -0" /3\ A5.1 20' -0" 96' - 0" STORAGE 109 268 SF 20' -0" MET STUD WALL FRAMING, TYP 18' -0" N WALL MOUNTED GREEN SCREEN TRELLIS SYSTEM, TYP N 2 A5.1 1i N 0 V n 8 A.3 --0 —0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 8300 SF 1/8" =1' -0" Old Town Gym City of Temecula 01 -22 -10 FIRST FLOOR PLAN w C A r c h i t e c t s I n c Rancho Cucamonga Office: 10470 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -3754 Folsom Office: 1110 Iron Point Road, Suite 200 Folsom, CA 95630 -8301 Emeryville Office: 1250 45th Street, Suite 150 Emeryville, CA 94608 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE 1 EXTERIOR PERSPECTIVE 2 Old Town Gym City of Temecula 01 -22 -10 PERSPECTIVES WLC A r c h i t e c t s, I n c Rancho Cucamonga Office: 10470 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -3754 Folsom Office: 1110 Iron Point Road, Suite 200 Folsom, CA 95630 -8301 Emeryville Office: 1250 45th Street, Suite 150 Emeryville, CA 94608 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Item No. 20 ACTION MINUTES of APRIL 27, 2010 City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING The Temecula Redevelopment Agency Meeting convened at 7:32 PM. CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Mike Naggar ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Edwards, Washington, Roberts, Naggar RDA PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. RDA CONSENT CALENDAR 11 Action Minutes - Approved Staff Recommendation (4 -0 -1) Agency Member Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Agency Member Roberts who abstained RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the action minutes of April 13, 2010. 12 Second Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Aareement and Escrow Instructions between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Temecula Water Park L.P., for the sale of Agency-owned property located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway (APN: 909 - 370 -002) - Approved Staff Recommendation (5 -0 -0) Agency Member Edwards made the motion; it was seconded by Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 10 -05 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND TEMECULA WATER PARK L.P., FOR THE SALE OF APPROXIMATELY 19.7 ACRES AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF DIAZ ROAD AND DENDY PARKWAY (APN: 909 - 370 -002) RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT RDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS REPORT RDA AGENCY MEMBERS REPORTS RDA ADJOURNMENT At 7:33 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, May 11, 2010, at 5:30 P.M., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Michael S. Naggar, Chair Person ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk /Agency Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 21 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director /Agency Members FROM: Tim Thorson, Director of Information Systems DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Award a Contract for the Old Town Sound System Retrofit RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members: Award a contract with Western Audio Visual Corp for upgrading the Old Town Sound System in the amount of $71,478.75 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $14,295.75, which is equal to 20% of the contract amount; 3. Approve the acceleration of $86,000.00 from the Redevelopment Agency CIP Budget of FY2010 -2011 to the current FY2009 -2010 for the Old Town Sound System Retrofit. BACKGROUND: On April 9, 2010, City Staff posted a Request for Proposal (RFP) on the City's online bidding system for the purchase and installation of an Old Town Sound System Retrofit. Two firms submitted proposals. The results were as follows: Old Town Sound System RFP Results 1 Western Audio Visual Corp $67,388.09 2 CompView $68,742.77 Western Audiovisual was the most qualified firm to implement the Old Town Sound System Upgrade. Their project methodology, prior experience, and subject matter expertise were exceptional and will provide the city with a quality sound system. The scope of services for this project includes the following: physical infrastructure, new control system, new street side equipment, discrete zones, and integrated sound system for Town Square and Quad. The City's estimate for the project was $115,000.00. Each of the two proponents submitted a cost for additive bid alternates, which included two additional JBL Column Loudspeakers for use in the Civic Center quad area. Western Audio Visual Additive Bid Alternates are $4,090.66. Staff's recommendation above includes this additive bid alternate, bringing the total contract price to $71,478.75. FISCAL IMPACT: The Old Town Sound System Retrofit project is anticipated in the FY 2010 -2011 Redevelopment Agency CIP Budget. With the recommended acceleration of Redevelopment Agency CIP funds in the amount of $86,000.00, sufficient funds will be in the project account — Account# 210 - 165 -515 for this expense. The total amount requested is $85,774.50, which includes the base agreement amount of $71,478.75 plus a 20% contingency of $14,295.75. ATTACHMENTS: Contract Project Location Project Description PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND WESTERN AUDIO VISUAL CORP OLD TOWN SOUND SYSTEM UPGRADE THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of May 11, 2010, between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and Western Audio Corp, a Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor "). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: TERM This Agreement shall commence on May 11, 2010, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than September 10, 2011, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. PURCHASE AND SALE OF EQUIPMENT On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Agreement Documents, Contractor agrees to manufacture, sell and install for the City upgraded sound equipment and infrastructure as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment "). 3. PURCHASE / INSTALLATION PRICE The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Contractor for the Equipment is Seventy One Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Eight Dollars and Seventy Five Cents. ($71,478.75). The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Contractor in accordance with the attached schedule. The City Manager /General Manager /Executive Director may approve additional work up to twenty percent (20 %) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. 4. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall manufacture and install the equipment as described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A ( "Work "). Contractor shall provide and furnish all labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed by the City. 5. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF VENDOR Contractor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Contractor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Contractor's execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement by Contractor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Contractor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Contractor, enforceable against Contractor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Contractor has good and marketable title to all of the Equipment manufactured and installed. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and clear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Agreement Documents. Contractor is aware the City is purchasing the Equipment for use as Old Town Sound System and that City is relying on Contractor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. C. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Contractor in this Agreement contains or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. 6. Contractor shall at all time faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Contractor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. TIME OF DELIVERY The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before September 10, 2010. 9. PLACE OF DELIVERY The Equipment shall be delivered to this location: Old Town Civic Center Parking Garage, 28690 Mercedes Street, Temecula, CA 92590, 2 n Floor. 10. In the event of such notice of non - conformity by City pursuant to the section entitled "City Approval" City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment and Installation, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment and Installation, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder or the Installation. The exercise of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any rights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Contractor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Contractor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 11. NO REPLACEMENT OF CURE This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Contractor expressly agrees that both the Equipment and Installation tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to the Section entitled "Rejection" City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to affect a cure of the original tender by Contractor. 12. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, District, and /or Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, District and /or Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non - performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 13. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: Equipment Description and /or Scope of Work attached hereto as Exhibit A. b. In the event any term or condition of the Agreement Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. C. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the Request for Proposal (RFP) and /or the Contractor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Contractor's response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Contractor's response to the RFP. 14. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event the Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the Executive Director or his delegate determines the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall service the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 15. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 1185 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self- Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director. At the option of the 4 Executive Director, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self- insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed tor state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and /or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 16. SURVIVAL OF REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANATIES All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery, installation and performance of this Agreement. 17. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub - contractors for this project, during his /her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub - contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. iP] IIIIIIIIIIIIIIil U ]4 »k,IA]4.YID161k,YY:LC431101:7 a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 20. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 21. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided below. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: Executive Director P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Use this Address for a Delivery Service: City of Temecula or Hand - Deliveries ONLY Attn: Executive Director 43200 Business Park Dr. Temecula, CA 92590 The City intends to relocate to a new City Hall on or about September of 2010. Please call 951- 694 -6444 to determine if the City has relocated. After the City has relocated, please use the following address for a delivery service or hand - deliveries ONLY: To Contractor: 22. GOVERNING LAW City of Temecula Attn: Executive Director 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Western Audio Visual Corp 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite G Carlsbad, CA 92008 The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this 7 Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 24. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Mike Naggar RDA Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk /Agency Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: M Peter M. Thorson Agency Counsel WESTERN AUDIO CORP (Signatures of two corporate officers are required): By: Printed Name: By: Printed Name: Title: 5365 Avenida Encinas Suite G Carlsbad, CA 92008 FSM Initials: Date: O Q EXHIBIT "A" DESCRIPTION OF EQUIPMENT, SCOPE OF WORK AND PAYMENT RATE AND SCHEDULE GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Scope of Work 1. Project City of Temecula Old Town Audio Upgrade and New Civic Center Quad/Town Square Audio System Temecula, California 2. Project Description The City of Temecula wishes to make enhancements to the existing Old Town Audio system and to provide sound coverage in the Civic Center Quad/Town Square. This Specification details the Audiovisual and Production Systems (collectively the "Audiovisual" Systems) to be provided as part of this project. The Audiovisual spaces described herein are as follows: a) Old Town Audio System Upgrade (Street -Side Music /PA) b) Civic Center Quad/Town Square Audio System B. Definition of Terms Definitions of terminology used in this Specification are as follows: 1. Owner: City of Temecula, CA 2. Audiovisual Consultant: PlanNet Consulting 3. Work: Engineered design, procurement, fabrication, testing, installation, and commissioning of the Audiovisual Systems and for the Project. 4. Specification: The complete set of documented designs, specifications, and performance and delivery requirements delineated in this document and all referenced project documentation. 5. Integrator: The vendor company responsible for carrying out the Work. 6. Audiovisual System: In this Specification the Audiovisual System includes all audio, video, control and other integrated electronic components and software related to supporting the audiovisual functionality of the rooms listed above in Section IA. 7. Provide: Supply, deliver, install, configure, test and commission. 8. Manufacturer: The original manufacturer of the individual audiovisual equipment components. 9. Commissioning Date: The date at which a system is formally accepted by the Owner. 10 10. Owner Furnished Equipment (OFE): Electronic equipment and other material (new or existing) to be provided by the Owner and integrated as part of the Project. 11. General Contractor: Edge Development, Temecula, CA 12. Architect: Nichols Melburg & Rossetto Architects + Engineers, Redding, CA C. Time of Completion Implementation Planning and Execution; Contractor shall work with the City and /or the General Contractor (Edge Development) to plan implementation schedules and methodologies, which minimizes impacts to users or other trades during installation and cutover processes. All costs for planning and coordination as well as for after normal business hours labor shall be included within the Contractor's pricing as required. It is anticipated that occupancy of the building will take place in early September 2010. 1. The Contractor's activities shall be confined to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Deviation from these hours will not be permitted without the prior consent of the IS Director, except in emergencies involving immediate hazard to persons or property. 2. In the event of either a requested or emergency deviation, inspection service fees will be charged against the Contractor. The service fees will be calculated at overtime rates, including benefits, overhead and travel time. The service fees will be deducted from any amounts due the Contractor. D. Approach The Integrator shall be responsible for the design, engineering, and provision of completely operational, integrated systems according to the functional descriptions prescribed within this Specification. Any and all incidental components or piece parts not specifically called out in this document, but required for the function of the Audiovisual System, shall be provided by the Integrator without additional cost to the Owner. Delivery of the work described in this Specification shall include, but not be limited to, the following Basic Services: 1. Engineering and Design: The Integrator shall provide all system engineering and design necessary to develop the complete systems described herein. Engineering and Design shall include preparation of all necessary electronic schematics, hardware drawings, systems diagrams, schedules, and lists. 2. Assembly: The Integrator shall procure and assemble all hardware and equipment and any additional materials as required to deliver the completely functioning Audiovisual System. 3. Software Programming: The Integrator shall perform all required software setup, configuration, and programming required to develop a complete operating system in accordance with these Specifications, including all control logic and push button component faceplate or interface programming. 4. Installation: The Integrator shall install all equipment, inter -rack and intra -rack cable, wiring of equipment, connectors, plates, and other material at the Project site per the Integrator's approved designs. 11 5. Testing and Adjustment: The Integrator shall perform all tests and adjustments, shall furnish all test equipment necessary and perform all work required to properly configure the systems and to verify their performance in accordance with the information in this Specification and the Integrator's approved engineered designs. 6. Acceptance Testing: Prior to Owner acceptance and hand -over of the completed Audiovisual System, the Integrator shall demonstrate the operation of the complete systems, including all individual devices and specified control functions. Both subjective and objective tests may be required by the Owner to determine compliance with the information in this Specification and the Integrator's approved designs. 7. Training: The Integrator shall provide technical training of Owner's staff, instructing them on Audiovisual Systems operation, maintenance and troubleshooting. 8. Warranty: The Integrator shall warrant the Audiovisual System in accordance with the terms of this Specification and accompanying contractual documents. E. Permits and Fees The Integrator shall obtain any permits and pay any fees required for the installation of the Audiovisual Systems. F. Material and Code Compliance 1. All materials and practices shall be in accordance with the governing standards, requirements and recommendations of all laws, orders, codes and regulations applicable to the Integrator and to the work being performed. 2. If in the opinion of the Integrator, an installation practice is required which is contrary to the Bids or associated documentation, such installation shall not commence until a written request for change or clarification has been made to the Owner and a response issued. 3. If an item of recommended equipment, a field condition or installation practice as specified does not meet governing code requirements, the Integrator shall bring such conflict to the attention of the Owner, and shall facilitate resolution of conflict with all parties concerned. 4. Integrator shall have a thorough knowledge of governing codes and standards. Lack of awareness of any of the relevant codes and standards will not be accepted as a reason for non - compliance. The Integrator shall be responsible for providing cable and materials that comply with applicable Codes and requirements of regulating bodies. The cost for these materials shall be included in the Bid price, as the Owner shall not accept change orders for changes in materials. 6. The Integrator shall review the General Contractor's Project Schedule and confirm that all schedule dates can be met. Any objections, qualifications, or exceptions must be clearly indicated with the submitted Bid. Refer to Specification Section I -G, A for additional scheduling requirements. G. Related Work by Others 12 The Integrator shall be responsible for coordinating and assuring the compatibility of the Audiovisual Systems with all related work, materials, and /or equipment being furnished and /or installed by others. This shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1. Cable Containment: All conduit, wireways, connection boxes, pull boxes, junction boxes, pathways, and other accommodations for routing of low voltage signal cabling, shall be supplied by others except where explicitly noted in this Specification. 2. Technical Power Service: All electrical panels, power receptacles, lighting fixtures, dimmers, lighting controls, and interconnecting wiring shall be supplied by others. 3. Equipment Support Structures: Design, fabrication and installation of all structural supports required for rigid connection of equipment items to the building structure shall be supplied by others. This does not relieve the Integrator from the responsibility for providing equipment mounting hardware and attachment to structural supports provided by others. 4. Millwork and Cabinetry: All millwork and millwork modifications required to accommodate installation of the Audiovisual System equipment and related cabling and connections, except as may be individually identified in this Specification, shall be provided by others. 5. Owner Furnished Equipment (OFE): Some Audiovisual Systems equipment may be provided and installed by others as part of the building construction. Such building related equipment shall be as described in the Project construction documents. Additionally, there may be equipment provided by the Owner or others (e.g., new equipment purchased by Owner, existing equipment to be reintegrated) that shall require installation and integration by the Integrator. 6. Building Controls & Security: Including environmental control, fire - detection, fire alarm, fire suppression and security systems. 7. Telephone: Provision of telephone services and handsets. 8. Furniture: Includes procurement and installation of furniture and furniture systems that are part of the building construction. The Integrator shall be responsible for providing electronic equipment racks and cabinets as maybe installed and /or integrated into furniture items as described in this Specification. H. Scheduling and Project Management 1. The Integrator shall provide all necessary project management and supervisory personnel required to assure the accurate, professional, and timely implementation of the Project. The Integrator shall prepare and maintain a detailed Audiovisual Systems Implementation Schedule based on the overall project schedule and the Owners stated delivery requirements. The Schedule shall identify all primary tasks associated with the Work and shall indicate planned beginning and ending dates for each task. 13 3. The Schedule shall be coordinated with the General Contractor and shall be subject to review and approval by the Owner. The Integrator shall be obligated to comply with the agreed upon installation and completion dates and shall be liable for all extraordinary costs incurred by the Integrator in meeting the Schedule. 4. The delivery dates for all required documentation shall be included in the Schedule. 5. The Integrator shall ensure that all material furnished by them as part of the Work is procured, delivered and installed in accordance with the Schedule and the overall Project schedule. 6. The Integrator's Project Manager shall attend regular scheduled coordination meetings at the job site to coordinate Audiovisual Systems issues during the course of the Project. 7. The Integrator shall make Project progress /status reports to the Owner on a regularly scheduled basis with the frequency as deemed appropriate by the Owner. The formal Schedule shall be updated and re- issued as appropriate. Design and Engineering 1. General System Design Procedures The Integrator shall coordinate appropriate design review meetings with the Audiovisual Consultant during the design and engineering stage of the Project. All submittals shall be presented to the Audiovisual Consultant for review, comment, and approval prior to proceeding with work on the subsequent stages of development in order to ensure that the Audiovisual System capabilities fulfill the Owner's expectations. The date of the design review meeting will be shown in the Project schedule supplied by the Integrator. 2. Control Software Development The following submittals and procedures shall be followed by the Integrator when developing the software and programming for the Audiovisual Systems. All submittals shall be presented to the Audiovisual Consultant for review, comment, and approval prior to proceeding with work on the subsequent stages of development in order to ensure that the Control System capabilities and user interface designs fulfill the Owner's expectations. a) In general, the Integrator shall follow the guidelines for creation of touchpanel control interfaces presented in the Dashboard for Controls Design Guide by Infocomm International, and it's companion Design Reference and Integrators Guide documents. b) Prior to commencement of user interface and master processor programming, the Integrator shall submit for approval a functional narrative and other documentation as necessary to describe the capabilities and operation of the Control System. c) Prior to commencement of user interface and master processor programming, the Integrator shall submit for approval proposed graphical layouts for all Control System touch screen control panels. The submittal shall utilize an interactive HTML -based graphical model that emulates the functional and logical capabilities of the actual user interface by showing . the interactive HTML -based screens and the proposed structure and page sequencing for each interface. 14 d) If the software emulator described above is not capable of demonstrating the specific control functionality to be provided by the interface (i.e., discreet button /device control functionality), the submittal shall be accompanied by a button -by- button functional description that identifies the discreet device and macro control functions activated by each of the interface buttons. e) The Integrator shall submit the above software models to the Owner at the following stages: 50% Functionality, 85% Functionality (at Design Review), and Final Software Configuration. J. Documentation 1. Design Documentation Following award of the contract and in accordance with the agreed Project schedule, the Integrator shall submit the documentation identified below to the Audiovisual Consultant. Drawings shall be provided in AutoCAD (version 2006 or later) and PDF format that is current at time of installation. a) A single -line system diagram, showing the configuration and basic system architecture, including all equipment components. b) Physical and logical system diagrams to port-level detail showing topology, configuration and capacity information including spare capacity for future upgrades. c) Database templates or other documentation identifying any information required from the Owner to complete the configuration of the Audiovisual Systems. d) Connectivity diagrams to demonstrate that all cabling interfaces are adequately defined. e) Proposed logical diagrams and layouts for all Control System touch screens. f) All control panels, connector plates, and designation strips to be punched, engraved, or silk- screened. Drawings shall specify all relevant terminology, engraving, finishes, colors, and materials. g) Schematic drawings of custom circuits. (Owner approval of schematic drawings of custom circuits shall not imply acceptance of design to perform desired task.) h) All proposed equipment modifications. (Owner approval of equipment modifications shall not imply acceptance of design to perform desired function.) i) Shop and field wiring diagrams, including cable types and functional description. j) Final equipment rack elevations for all Audiovisual Systems equipment that identify all individual equipment components. k) Shop drawings for special equipment, including fabrication and installation requirements. 15 1) Specification sheets with dimensions and photo / rendering of all equipment deemed to have an impact on the appearance of the facilities. The integrator shall coordinate with the Audiovisual Consultant to identify all such items. m) Manufacturer's specification sheets (cut sheets) for all network and ancillary equipment such as optical fiber patch cables, equipment cabinets, etc. n) A logical network diagram, showing the network configuration including basic VLAN configuration, proposed addressing scheme, location of routing services etc. for the Network. o) A test plan for cabling, connections, and equipment. The test plan shall be periodically updated to reflect any changes in project scope, equipment functionality, and performance. 2. Completion Documentation Upon completion of the installation, the Integrator shall submit the following documentation to the Audiovisual Consultant: a) Installed System: The Integrator shall provide a complete set of as- built Audiovisual Systems diagrams in hard -copy and electronic format (AutoCAD version 2006 or later version that is current at time of installation and PDF). All drawings shall conform to the Project drawing standards. At a minimum, this shall identify all Audiovisual Systems equipment components provided by the Integrator. b) Control System Submittals: Upon completion of the Project, the Integrator shall submit a complete set of system software, software programming code, and documentation as follows: (1) Final Software Programming Code, Program Source Code including any pre - compiled module code and documentation (2) Control System As -built Schematic Connection Diagrams (3) In the case of non - commercial or custom software, a complete set of software and related documentation and information is required, including license (if applicable) and documentation for all devices, utilities, and tools used in the operation and maintenance of the Audiovisual Systems.. Documentation shall be presented in such a way as to allow the Owner the ability to perform unassisted operation, maintenance, troubleshooting, and programming. (4) In the case of any other commercial software, a complete set of software including the license and documentation for all devices, utilities, and tools used in the operation and maintenance of the Audiovisual Systems. Provide list of manufacturer or publisher, version, product name or model, technical and warranty support contact, purchase date, and reseller (if not Integrator). (5) The Integrator shall provide an electronic copy of the final working software /hardware configurations all configurable Audiovisual Equipment saved to a CD -R, labeled, and accompanied by a total and complete reload procedure that has been tested by the Integrator and the Owner. 16 (6) The Integrator shall provide a disaster recovery plan or procedure. (7) The Integrator shall provide a document outlining suggested maintenance of the systems and component manufacturer warranty durations. c) Hardware Documentation: The Integrator shall supply two hard copies of the items identified below for each installed product. The Integrator shall also provide electronic copies of such documentation in a readily accessible format if available from the manufacturer. (1) User Manuals (2) Technical Manuals (3) Product Data Sheets d) As -built Equipment Inventory: The Integrator shall provide a complete inventory of installed equipment components detailing the actual installation of equipment in each room. This inventory shall include: (1) Any Network Address assigned to IP configurable equipment. (2) Number of inputs /outputs ports and connection types available upon completion of installation. (3) Modules /blades /cards installed in each component. (4) Serial numbers for each component (5) Spare parts available e) Warranty and /or Maintenance Contract Information: The Integrator shall provide all information appropriate for the Owner to make use of the supplied warranty and /or maintenance contract. At a minimum, this shall include: (1) Warranty and /or Maintenance Contract identification numbers when required. (2) Contact information necessary to take advantage of Warranty and /or Maintenance contracts. (3) Coverage dates for each system element installed. K. Delivery and Storage Costs of shipping all Audiovisual Systems equipment and related materials (including shipping material to the site as well as costs of unusual off site storage requirements) shall be borne by the Integrator. It shall be the responsibility of the Integrator to make appropriate arrangements with the authorized personnel at the site for the acceptance, handling, protection, and storage of equipment delivered to the site. The Integrator retains ownership of the equipment until Final Acceptance of Systems. 2. The Integrator shall make every reasonable effort to protect the Integrator's finished and unfinished work against damage or loss during delivery and storage. 3. The security of any equipment and /or tools provided by the Integrator for the purpose of installing this system shall be the responsibility of the Integrator. 17 4. The Owner shall retain the right to inspect all systems and equipment stored off site. L. Training The Integrator shall provide at least 40 hours of training for the Owner's maintenance and /or technical staff to become proficient in the general operation, routine maintenance, troubleshooting, and other basic system support functions. The Integrator shall provide a training plan that identifies the level of training associated with varying skill levels of user groups working with the hardware and software from the Owner's staff. M. Warranty The Integrator shall warrant the Audiovisual Systems as follows: Basic Warranty: a) The Integrator shall warrant the Audiovisual Systems to be free from faults and defects in system design and workmanship. This Basic Warranty coverage shall include all custom designed equipment and the overall Audiovisual Systems installation. Basic Warranty shall be effective for a period of one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the Audiovisual Systems acceptance by the Owner. b) Within the period of Basic Warranty coverage, individual manufacturers' equipment warranties shall apply to all purchased equipment. In the event that the manufacturer's warranty has expired on a failed device (i.e., equipment warranty of less than one year), the Owner shall be responsible for the actual cost of any required repairs. All manufacturers' equipment warranties shall be effective as of the date of Owner Acceptance. c) Response time for Basic Warranty service work shall be no longer than two (2) business days from the time a request for service is submitted to the Integrator by the Owner. d) The Integrator shall warrant that all equipment, materials and components installed are new at the time of installation. No used or reconditioned equipment shall be acceptable. e) If equipment modification by the Integrator voids the manufacturers' warranty, the Integrator shall assume the equivalent equipment warranty. 2. Extended Warranty The Integrator shall propose to the Owner the offer of Extended Warranty coverage for the Audiovisual Systems. Extended Warranty shall be optional warranty services offered by the Integrator and accepted by the Owner that extend, expand on and /or complement the Basic Warranty coverage required by this Specification. Any provisions of Extended Warranty coverage shall not release the Integrator from responsibility for performance of all requirements under the Basic Warranty coverage. 18 II. VENDOR BID REQUIREMENTS A. General Bid Requirements Bids shall be submitted in accordance with the instructions outlined in the bid documents. 2. Bids received by the Owner that omit any portion of these submittal requirements may be deemed non - responsive. 3. The cost for preparing any Bid shall be borne solely by the Bidder. No part of the cost of preparing the Bid shall be incorporated into the Bid itself. 4. Bidder warrants upon submission of Bid that the Bidder has reviewed all construction drawings, construction specifications, system description documents, and related contract documents for the Project and that the Bid submitted is inclusive of all labor, materials and supplies required to deliver the complete operational Audiovisual Systems as specified. 5. All equipment proposed and supplied by the Bidder shall be new, in current production, and shall meet or exceed the technical and functional performance requirements outlined in this Bid and in the Integrator's approved design drawings and specifications. B. Bidder Selection Criteria The lowest Pre - qualified Bidder shall be contracted to perform the Work. C. Personnel The Bidder shall confirm explicitly that the personnel who shall be employed to carry out the Work are suitably trained in the management of a project of this nature, and in the installation and maintenance of equipment of the type being provided in order to carry out all work in a competent manner. 2. All Bidder personnel conducting work on -site shall be required to complete all safety training required by the projects General Contractor or Owner. D. Compliance with this Bid The Bidder shall comply with this Bid in all respects and shall provide a statement confirming compliance with the Bid. Where it is not possible to comply fully, the Bidder shall: Offer a suitable alternative stating clearly how it differs from the specification. 2. State whether or not the item can be made fully compliant, and if so, at what cost. 3. Where Bidder alternatives are offered, the Bidder shall clearly indicate the differences in cost and functionality between the requirement and the Bidder's alternative. E. Price Summary Schedules 1. The Bidder shall provide the pricing summary information as delineated in the Price Summary Schedules provided as an appendix to this document. 2. Itemized pricing for all components, including material, freight, taxes, installation, commissioning, programming, configuration, training, warranty, and other costs shall be provided with the Bid documents. 3. 19 F. Bid Documents Submit a proposed project schedule. Although the Project Schedule section of this Bid contains anticipated dates for completion of the Work, Bidders are encouraged to review these dates and make their own assessment and schedule that allows the project to be completed ahead of the dates shown on the Project Schedule. 2. Submit a list of any anticipated work on the Project that the Bidder may subcontract. For all subcontracted work, bidder shall describe the work and identify the proposed subcontractor. Appropriate qualification information shall be submitted for each subcontracting firm. 3. Bidder shall submit system and equipment technical information in accordance with the following: a) Bidder shall submit itemized lists of all equipment proposed to be supplied. Itemized equipment listings must include all equipment necessary to develop the complete functioning systems, whether or not the equipment is specifically identified in this Bid. b) Technical data sheets for individual equipment items shall be provided upon request from the Owner. Information provided must clearly indicate how the item described meets the specified functional requirements. c) The Bidder may choose to submit single line drawings to clarify the systems architecture design and component connectivity throughout the Audiovisual Systems Bid. 4. Bidders shall submit Bid pricing information in accordance with the following: a) Each piece of equipment shall be individually priced in the itemized equipment lists submitted. Sub totals shall be provided for each unique system and sub system as defined within this Bid. b) Bid pricing shall include separately itemized costs for providing warranty support as described elsewhere in this Bid. c) Bid pricing shall separately itemize incremental costs associated with on -site installation work performed outside regular business hours and /or any overtime work required to meet the indicated schedule. 5. Bidders shall submit a proposed preliminary training schedule indicating the number and duration (in hours) of training sessions proposed for each component of the Audiovisual System. This training schedule shall also clearly indicate if a particular training session will be conducted by the Integrator or a third party, for example an equipment manufacturer. 6. Other bid submittal requirements: a) Bidder shall submit a Warranty Statement clearly identifying any exclusions or conditions affecting warranty of the Audiovisual Systems. Minimum warranty coverage (Basic Warranty) is defined in the Scope of Work. Bids submitted that do not include Basic Warranty coverage may be deemed non - responsive. 20 b) Bidder shall submit descriptions and pricing for any Enhanced Warranty coverage or Maintenance Support that extends beyond the coverage of Basic Warranty and may be available at the Owners option. Owner shall retain the right to accept or reject Enhanced Warranty and supplemental support services as proposed up until commencement of Basic Warranty. c) All other submittal requirements as maybe delineated in the Owner's documentation as presented with this Bid and invitation to Bid. G. Bidder Requests for Information (RFI) Bidders may submit questions and requests for information or clarification of the requirements of this Bid. Bidder Requests for Information must be submitted in writing on or before the designated deadline date, and in accordance with the procedures identified in the cover documentation provided by the Owner with this Bid. The Owner shall respond in a single written response to all requests received by deadline date. Responses shall be circulated to all bidders shortly following the deadline date. Requests received by the Owner after the cut -off date shall not be considered or responded to unless it is determined by the Owner that the matter raised has a critical impact on the requirements of the Bid or the bidding process. H. Quality Assurance The Bidder shall state whether the Bidder is registered under ISO 9000 or similar quality registration and, if so, state the date of registration. The Bidder shall describe the procedures to be used to ensure that the work on site shall be to the required standard. I. Spare Parts The Bidder shall state the guaranteed period, from the service commissioning date, for stocking spare parts. Spare parts shall include amplifiers, microphones, processors, power supplies, etc., and other standard piece parts which if faulty, present a service outage to the Owner. J. Other Bid Requirements In addition to the Bid submittal requirements delineated in this Bid, the Owner may, in the cover documentation presented with this Bid, identify other requirements that must be fulfilled by the Bidder. Bids received that do not comply with all stated requirements shall be disqualified. 21 III. EXECUTION OF WORK The sections below provide a narrative overview of the specific functional, technical, and operational requirements and capabilities of the Audiovisual System. Please refer to the Appendix A - Audiovisual Systems Diagrams (AV0.1, AV10.11, AV10.12, and AV10.13), as well as Appendix B — Major Equipment and Approved Manufacturers List. A. Old Town Audio System Upgrade — Technical Systems Description New Audio System Upgrades a) Refer to AV10.11 which shows the current site plan with the 6th Street audio control room head end, the street side audio amplification boxes, and the speaker zones throughout Old Town. b) All of the audio systems shown clouded on AV10.12 will be replaced with a new Digital Signal Processor, which will include Cobranet and Desktop Control Application Software (DiVinci). This software will reside on a new local computer that can be access over the network for remote control and diagnostics. 2. New System Source Equipment a) All source equipment shown clouded on AV10.12 will be replaced as well. See Appendix B for full list of replacement equipment. 3. New Control System a) All control system equipment will be replaced, per Appendix B list of replacement equipment. b) There is a rack mounted control panel that will be used for remote access and control capability over the network. 4. New Equipment for Street Side Equipment Rack B, a) Street -side equipment Rack A distribution equipment and hardware will be consolidated into street -side equipment rack B. AV Contractor is to provide new amplification and cabling, and relocation of any needed gear from Rack A to support Rack A distributed speakers from the new Rack B configuration. The old Nema 4 enclosure will be removed by others. 5. The AV Contractor will be responsible for coordinating with the Architect, Consultant, and other project team members during the integration of this system. B. Civic Center Quad/Town Center Audio System — Technical Systems Description Sources a) This system will be used for both live speech and for background music. Music sources shall be originate from the Civic Auxiliary room, and from the 6th Street Old Town audio control room. Speech will be originated locally by both hardwired and wireless microphones. 22 b) The AV contractor shall provide a signal link between the 6th street audio control room in Old Town and the Civic Auxiliary Room equipment rack. This requirement allows for the extension of audio sources from Old Town into the Civic Quad and Town Center areas. c) AV contractor will utilize existing conduit pathways between the Civic Center and 6th Street, provided by the General Contractor. As for cabling pathways for Line Array Loudspeakers, microphones, and microphone antennas, these will be provided by the General Contractor. Line Arrays a) There are to be two (2) 40" passive line array column loudspeakers installed on the front exterior of the Civic Center, directly in front of the main Quad area, as indicated on drawing AV0.1. In addition, there will be two (2) 20" passive line array column loudspeakers installed on lighting poles in the Town Center, as indicated on AV0.1. b) There are two (2) additive alternate line array column loudspeakers that are to be included in the bidders proposal. If included in the final system design, these will provide extended coverage in the Quad area. Note that the addition of these loudspeakers will also require additional DSP output cards, as indicated on the equipment list. c) The AV Contractor will be responsible for coordinating with the Architect, Consultant, and other project team members during the integration of this system. 3. Digital Signal Processing and Amplification a) This system will utilize existing equipment in the Civic Auxiliary room equipment rack. The AV Contractor will coordinate with the Owner and /or other project team members to integrate the additional input output cards in the DSP. The AV Contractor will also be responsible for making any necessary adjustments to the digital signal processing configuration file, for any signal flow, equalization, delays, etc. needed for final commissioning of the this system. 4. New Control System a) All control system equipment will be replaced, per Appendix B list of replacement equipment. b) There is a rack mounted control panel that will be used for remote access and control capability over the network. 5. New Equipment for Street Side Equipment Rack B, a) Street -side equipment Rack A distribution equipment and hardware will be consolidated into street - side equipment rack B. AV Contractor is to provide new amplification and cabling, and relocation of any needed gear from Rack A to support Rack A distributed speakers from the new Rack B configuration. The old Nema 4 enclosure will be removed by others. C. Technical Performance Requirements The Audiovisual System will follow the Technical Performance Requirements described below: 23 Equipment Specifications a) Like Components All like devices used in the Project shall be the same (i.e., manufacturer, model). Standardization of like components will enable consistent Audiovisual System functional and technical performance, familiar interface capabilities, and efficient maintenance and support. Should limited product availability or other factors impair the Integrator's ability to provide like components throughout the Project, the Integrator shall immediately bring the situation to the attention of the Audiovisual Consultant so that an appropriate course of action can be identified. b) Approved Equipment Manufacturers The Audiovisual Consultant has provided an approved manufacturer equipment list for the Audiovisual System. It is preferred that components of the system solution proposed shall be sourced from the manufacturers identified in Appendix B: Major Equipment and Approved Manufacturers List. If the Integrator proposes to substitute an alternate manufacturer, the proposed submittal shall be presented to the Audiovisual Consultant in accordance with the procedures identified elsewhere in this Specification. c) Additional Equipment Components and Spares The following Additional Equipment Components shall be provided by the Integrator as a part of the Audiovisual System: (1) Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS): The Integrator shall provide UPS equipment in each equipment rack, except the audio amplifier rack. In the event of a power failure, each UPS shall be capable of powering devices for a minimum of 20 minutes at full operating load. (2) Power Conditioners: The Integrator shall provide power conditioners in each equipment rack to protect electronic equipment from fluctuations in building power supply. Power conditioners shall derive line voltage power from the UPS in each equipment rack, or may be integral with the UPS. (3) Computer (VGA) Interface Cabling shall be provided by the Integrator as a part of the Audiovisual System. The Integrator shall provide all cabling necessary to connect wall and rack mounted computer and laptop audio and video interfaces to Owner furnished (OFE) laptop and desktop computers as specified in this document. (4) Spares: The Integrator shall provide the following spares: (a) Microphone foam covers — (1 complete set) 2. Audiovisual System Performance Requirements The individual elements of the complete integrated Audiovisual System shall meet or exceed the technical performance defined below. a) Audio Systems The audio systems, when properly installed and adjusted shall meet the following performance criteria: 24 (1) Loudness: Through the general listening area the media and /or voice audio systems shall produce an undistorted sound level greater that 90dB when reproducing typical program material. This shall be verified after the system has been equalized to meet frequency response specifications. An approved sound level meter set to "C" weighting and "SLOW' meter response shall be used to make this measurement. The audio system should be able to provide 100 dB of headroom or the ability to produce program peaks of 100 dB. Program peaks should not produce any type of audible distortion. (2) Hum and Noise: With system gain set for 90dB peak levels from any normal program source, electrical noise should not exceed 0.2 volts RMS at power amplifier output terminals. Operation of various system controls such as program source, gain control, lighting controls, etc. should not introduce objectionable noise into the system. (3) Frequency Response: Using accepted and approved 1/3- octave analysis procedures, the response of each audio channel will be equalized to provide a "flat" frequency response curve over the frequency spectrum of the specified equipment. This requirement may be relaxed if the Owner requests a modified response curve to meet specialized requirements. It is important that loudspeaker crossover settings and equalization be trimmed to result in the closest possible match between each speaker channel, as measured at a favorable centralized listening position. (4) Signal to Noise Ratio: (inclusive of cross -talk and hum) Signal to noise ratios should be measured using an approved sound level meter, set to 'linear" weighting'and "SLOW" meter response. Unless restricted by the undistorted output level of the system, the overall system SIN ratio should be greater than 70dB. (5) Total Harmonic Distortion: With the exception of microphones and speakers, the published THD for any piece of,audio equipment in the system should not exceed 0.1 % over a 20 Hz to 20 kHz bandwidth. b) Analog Video Systems The video systems, when properly installed and adjusted shall meet the following performance criteria: (1) Differential Gain: Using a standard spectrum analyzer and test signal the differential gain should not exceed 3 %. Any variation in color saturation should also be subjectively reviewed. (2) Differential Phase: Using a standard spectrum analyzer and test signal, the differential phase should not exceed 2 %. Any variation in color hue should also be subjectively reviewed. (3) Signal to Noise Ratio: The un- weighted DC to 4.2MHz signal to noise ratio should be 55dB minimum (inclusive of cross -talk. Peak to RMS). (4) Frequency Response: The frequency response for any piece of video equipment in the system should not vary more than +/ 0.5dB DC to 4.2MHz. (5) Line and Field Tilt: Less than 2% 25 (6) Color Timing: Within 3 degrees at 3.58MHz. c) Audiovisual Control System (1) Hardware Performance Requirements (a) The Integrator shall be responsible for providing all control processing, communication and connectivity hardware as required to deliver a complete, operational integrated system. (b) The Control Systems shall provide either auto - sensing network configuration or manual network configuration on 10 or 100 base T networks. (c) The Control System shall fully support Domain Name Server (DNS) and Dynamic or Static Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) for all network communication. (d) The Control System shall support asynchronous communication providing the ability to send and receive data at the same time. (e) Master Control System processors shall support multiple levels of security for secure network access to the system. (f) The Control System shall support the Owner's IT Systems' network firewall, gateway, and network routing. (g) The Control System shall support control of devices via Ethernet control, serial control, or infrared control. (2) Software Performance Requirements (a) The Integrator shall be responsible for providing all software, and all software configuration, setup, and programming as required to deliver a complete, operational integrated Control System providing the user control functionality designated in the Specifications. (b) All software programming must be included in the scope of the Integrator's work. No portion may be omitted from the scope of Integrator's work. Bids excluding any portion of the software programming will be deemed non - responsive. (c) All commercial software provided by the Integrator, as part of the Project shall be procured and transferred in full compliance with the publisher's copyright, licensing, and other requirements of ownership and use. All software license agreements shall be registered in the name of the Owner. iz' (d) The Owner shall retain full rights to all custom software, programming, and software configuration programming code developed by the Integrator as part of the Project. This shall include the right to use, reproduce, and modify the software and software programming code as reasonably required to operate the Audiovisual Systems and to support their ongoing utility, maintenance, and development. (e) The Audiovisual Control System programmers shall be trained and certified by the system manufacturer. The Integrator must be certified as a dealer in good standing with the manufacturer of the Audiovisual Control System hardware and software. (f) As part of the Control System design, the Integrator must provide the means and define the procedures for backup of the Control System software and programming code. This backup system may include a removable -type memory backup or a network server backup procedure via FTP transfer, or CD -R. 3. System Assembly and Installation a) Physical Installation Installation shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Uncrating, setting in place, fastening to walls, floors, ceilings, counters, or other structures where required of all equipment except as otherwise noted. (2) Interconnect wiring of the components of the system. (3) Equipment alignment and adjustment. (4) All other work whether or not expressly required herein which is necessary to result in a completely tested and operating system. (5) All equipment shall be firmly secured in place unless requirements of portability dictate otherwise. Fastenings and supports shall be adequate to support their loads with a safety factor of at least three (3) times. (6) All boxes, equipment, etc. shall be plumb and square. b) General Execution of Work (1) All assembly and material cutting shall be limited to a working area specifically designated for this purpose. (2) Cable and wire stripping scrap and conductor strands shall be kept away from sensitive electronic equipment such that loose pieces do not become lodged inside equipment. (3) All racks, consoles, connection boxes and other equipment enclosures shall be degreased and vacuum cleaned prior to installation of equipment or panels. 27 (4) The Integrator shall take measures to protect all cabinets, casework, finished flooring, wall coverings, equipment, and other surrounding objects from damage resulting from its work. This shall include, but not be limited to, the installation of temporary protective coverings. Any damage resulting from the work of the Integrator shall be corrected by the Integrator at no additional cost to the Owner. (5) Prior to shipment to site, all major pieces of equipment shall be unpacked and checked thoroughly at the Integrator's premises. The Owner will not be liable for any delays of completion in installation due to defective equipment being received by Integrator. (6) All equipment racks and sub assemblies shall be constructed at Integrator's premises. This will include, but not be limited to, wiring, labeling, dressing, supports, and ventilation. (7) All spaces shall be cleaned as an ongoing activity. The Integrator shall vacuum clean all work areas and remove all debris, scrap, and waste at least every week, and after any substantial debris accumulation. At the conclusion of the work in a given room area, a final vacuum cleaning of all such access spaces shall be performed. All loose items, including those that were existing at the start of the work, shall be removed. Wet mopping shall be performed on flooring only when other dry cleaning methods are insufficient. No brushing or wet cleaning of equipment shall be permitted. (8) The Integrator shall generate any additional drawings or information required for fabrication, installation and wiring of the system. (9) The Integrator shall be responsible for the proper alignment, adjustment and calibration of all audiovisual equipment including equipment specified as Owner Furnished Equipment (OFE), and shall provide all personnel and test equipment for the system test and adjust. (10) The Integrator shall be responsible for verifying the compatibility of all equipment and related hardware with related work performed by others. This includes, but is not limited to, electrical, mechanical, structural, and all finish work. (11) The Integrator shall furnish all software necessary to operate software controlled audiovisual equipment or sub systems (e.g. remote control system). Whether produced by the Integrator or supplied by a software manufacturer, all software will be installed and tested prior to the delivery of equipment to the site. c) Equipment Installation (1) Equipment Racks The Integrator shall use metal equipment racks of standard height unless otherwise specified. Whether a metal rack or custom cabinetry is used, the following shall apply: (a) Equipment mounting shall conform to industry standards of 1 3/4" rack units. 28 (b) The Equipment Rack shall have a lockable front and back door. (c) The Integrator shall only use rack rails that are tapped for #10 -32 screws (no clip nuts shall be used). (d) The Integrator shall implement a general ventilation scheme for all consoles and racks in the Project. A proposed scheme shall be presented to the Audiovisual Consultant for approval prior to execution of the work. (e) Provide blank rack panels in all rack openings not occupied by equipment. Blank filler panels shall not exceed three rack units in size. Panel color shall be matte black. Perforated panels may be used to aid in proper ventilation. (f) All devices within equipment racks shall be mounted to the equipment rack. No devices shall be resting atop or mounted to other devices within the equipment racks. (g) Devices will be mounted in the racks in logical order. Generally, signal flow should move from the top of the rack to bottom. Heavier devices should be mounted in the lower portion to ensure that the assembly is not too top heavy. Frequently used devices will be mounted at the optimal elevation for operator use. (h) Each rack shall be uniquely identified with an engraved, self- adhesive label affixed to the front top frame. The size and appearance of these labels will be reviewed for approval by Audiovisual Consultant. (i) Integrator rack logo panels shall be confined to a single rack unit. Rack logo panel graphics shall be submitted for approval by the Audiovisual Consultant. Rack logo plates shall identify the name of the Integrator, the Audiovisual Consultant, and the name of the Owner. (2) Cable Dress (a) In general, cable dressing shall be considered from a maintenance standpoint. Suitable service loops shall be provided to allow removal of equipment, or to extend equipment that is mounted in the rack on rack slides. Where there is no rear access to the rack mounted equipment, this requirement shall be carefully addressed, and cabling shall be of sufficient length to enable the removal and replacement of any individual piece of equipment with all others in place. 29 (b) It is expected that the Integrator will fabricate some portions of the systems off site. Pre- wiring is acceptable provided that the pre wired assembly can easily be transported to its final location without complication, and without risk of cable or equipment damage. Use of intermediate connections for inter rack cables is not acceptable. (c) Equipment specified as "Future" shall be accommodated with cables installed and routed normally, with the unterminated end being labeled, sealed in a plastic bag, and tagged appropriately. (d) The Integrator shall be responsible for determining the proper length of all cables whether manufactured on or off the job site. (e) The Integrator shall determine the desired method of securing cables. All of the following requirements must be met by the system: (i) Plastic cable ties are the preferred method of cable lacing. Lay in systems are not acceptable except as applied to a horizontal cable tray. (ii) Wires and cable shall be installed in a neat and orderly fashion, with like cable types following similar paths. Groups of cables shall be neatly combed and harnessed. Harnessed groups of cables shall be anchored at suitable intervals to reduce and relieve wire strain, especially strain on connections. Adequate service loops shall be provided at all cable endpoints. (iii) Some rack - mounted equipment utilizes slide assemblies for front extension while in operation. For this type of mounting, additional, carefully dressed service loops on all cables shall be provided and installed with spring operated cable retractor assemblies to gather and recoil the service loop. (iv) For all schemes of cable routing, no point in the path shall be subjected to a bend radius of less than eight (8) times the cable diameter, or minimum cable bend radius specified by the manufacturer. (v) Captive cables shall not be laced in such a manner as to prevent removal of the equipment to which they are captive. (f) Wires and cables shall be segregated according to signal type. In addition, audio cable shall be subdivided into three (3) classes: microphone level circuits, line level circuits, and speaker level circuits. 30 • Microphone level audio circuits shall be kept at least three inches (3 ") from any other type of parallel signal circuits and at least six inches (6 ") from any parallel AC power circuits. • Speaker level audio circuits shall be kept a minimum of three inches (3") from line level audio and AC power circuits. All other signal circuits shall be kept at least three inches (3 ") away from any parallel AC power circuits. • Where circuits of different types must cross, they shall do so at right angles and then return to the above required separations in as short a distance as possible. (g) Conductors, wires, and cables shall be continuous between termination points. Splices are not acceptable. (h) Cable tie and lacing installation shall be accomplished using hand tools specifically designed to apply proper tension to the cable tie, and to cut the end off flush with no protruding sharp edges. The Integrator's field supervisor shall spot check assemblies using cable ties both visually and by touch, thereby detecting any sharp edges of improperly cut cable ties. Install cable ties on all cable runs of two or more cables that are not supported by raceway, cable tray, or other means. Place cable ties approximately six inches (6 ") apart. Do not use more cable ties than are necessary for a neat installation. Cable ties shall not be applied with excessive force that may damage or deform sensitive and fragile cables. (3) Cable Types All cables installed shall meet appropriate governing codes and standards. The following cable types are recommended for use: (a) Component Analog Video: 5- conductor, High Res. Coaxial, 26 AWG. (b) S Video: 2- conductor, S- video, 26 AWG. (c) Composite Analog Video: RG -59/U Coaxial, 20 AWG. (d) Audio - Speaker: Single twisted pair, 12 AWG. (e) Audio - Microphone: Single twisted pair, shielded, 22 . AWG. (f) Control: Multi conductor, overall shield 24 AWG. (g) Partyline Intercom: Single twisted pair, shielded, 20 AWG (h) Serial Data: Multi conductor, overall shield, 24 AWG, low capacitance (i) Broadband Television: RG -111U Coaxial, 14 AWG. (4) Cable Labeling 31 (a) Provide unique cable designation on each distinct wire or cable. Labels shall be installed within two inches of connectors, unless this interferes with disassembly of the connector. (b) The Integrator shall submit a sample of their cable labeling standards to the Owner and Audiovisual Consultant for review and acceptance. (c) Labels shall be installed in such a manner as to be visible without unlacing any harnesses. (5) Power Cords (a) All equipment power cords shall terminate in a standard plug that shall be wired in compliance with governing codes and standards. (b) Power cords may be laced to the racks as long as the cords are removable at the power connector on the piece of equipment. This is to allow removal of the equipment without undoing the cable lacing. Power cords shall not be laced in the same bundle with signal or control cables. If the power cord is an active component of the equipment, the cable shall be dressed separately from all other cables terminating at the equipment to facilitate easy removal of the equipment. (c) All power plugs shall be labeled with the component's label name. (d) All power cords shall be plugged into an AC power distribution strip which will be pre -wired into the rack prior to delivery to site (6) Cable Termination (a) Wire and cable termination shall be performed in accordance with Broadcast Industry Standards and the guidelines of generally accepted professional installation practices. (b) With respect to audio equipment interconnects, the Integrator shall make every effort to use equipment with balanced inputs and outputs. When this is not possible, such as the case to meet specification, the following are recommended (in order of preference): An electronic balancing device (professional interface) or balancing transformer should be utilized. In the case of an unbalanced output driving a balanced input, forward referencing should be utilized. An active balanced to unbalanced interconnect is not recommended. 4. Electrical Requirements a) Technical Power 32 (1) Technical Power, defined as AC power dedicated to the audiovisual equipment and other critical audiovisual systems, will service the Audiovisual System. (2) All racks and cabinets shall have pre -wired AC power strips for Technical Power distribution within the rack. The assembled rack internal power strips shall conform to approved testing laboratory specifications. Each circuit shall consist of a "hot" wire, a dedicated neutral wire, and a dedicated ground wire of equal current carrying capacity. (3) The Integrator shall coordinate the power interface between the equipment enclosure and the building with the Audiovisual Consultant. The Audiovisual Consultant will provide Technical Power at locations adjacent to audiovisual equipment where specified. (4) The Audiovisual Systems shall be designed so that power may be supplied or removed smoothly or abruptly at any time without causing damage to system equipment. b) Grounding Practices (1) Technical Ground shall be defined as the ground or earth protection that is dedicated to the Technical Power service supplying electrical power to the audiovisual systems. (2) Because of the great number of variations possible in a grounding system, it shall be the responsibility of the Integrator to follow good engineering practices as outlined below, and to deviate from these practices only when necessary to minimize cross -talk and to maximize signal to noise ratios in audio and video systems. (3) In order to minimize problems resulting from improper grounding, and to achieve maximum signal to noise ratio, the following grounding procedures shall be adhered to: (a) A uni -point ground scheme shall be maintained throughout the systems. A dedicated ground buss bar shall be provided for the exclusive use of the Audiovisual Systems. This buss bar shall serve as a termination point for all equipment rack frame grounds and AC power panel isolated ground conductors. The Audiovisual Systems' Technical Ground buss bar will be connected to the central facility ground at one point only. (b) Each audiovisual system equipment rack will be connected to the Technical Power ground buss bar via a dedicated eight (8) gauge green copper wire. The Audiovisual Systems equipment racks will be isolated from building steel, cable trays, electrical conduit and any other object or device that would compromise the isolated ground system. All conduits entering the equipment racks will be isolated from the enclosure itself with an insulated fitting. 33 (c) All devices in the audiovisual system racks shall be serviced with a grounded AC outlet. Devices having two (2) prong power cords shall also have a fourteen (14) gauge green copper wire connected from the chassis to the grounded copper buss bar mounted to the equipment rack frame. Under no circumstances shall the prong of a three (3) prong power cord be removed. (d) Audio cable shield shall be connected to ground at one point only. Exceptions may be made for phantom powered microphones and some ICM and IFB systems. This ground point shall be at the system ground of the destination device, which shall be strapped to the system ground in the rack. For intra rack wiring this requires the shield to be connected at both ends, but grounded at only one end. (e) All video receptacles shall be insulated from the mounting panel, outlet box, or wireway. Unless otherwise detailed, this shall be accomplished by using insulated from panel type receptacles. (f) The Integrator shall take care to consider ground references within each device and the grounding factors on site. D. Architectural Integration Requirements The following information is provided to clarify critical elements of the Audiovisual System integration into the buildings and to identify specific design intent throughout the Project. Some of the work and conditions described may be wholly or partially the responsibility of others. The Integrator shall be responsible for ensuring that the Audiovisual System is fully compatible with the designs, equipment, fabrications, and conditions described. 1. Rear Projection System The Integrator shall be responsible for providing the rear projection screen, frame, mirror and mirror frame as specified, and for coordinating the installation of this equipment into the Rear Projection Room with the General Contractor. 2. Computer Workstation Integration The Integrator shall be responsible for providing all miscellaneous material required to provide the complete integration of owner furnished computer equipment with the Audiovisual System. With the aim of providing clear and simple user connection of computers to the Audiovisual System, the Integrator shall observe the following requirements: a) The Integrator shall securely attach any applicable interface electronics in a position that provides easy access for connection of signal cables as well as adjustment and service of the electronics by system maintenance personnel. No loose equipment will be accepted unless specifically directed otherwise. b) All computer video connections at the end user positions (e.g., laptop connections) shall utilize standard VGA -type (15 -pin HD) signal connections. 34 c) Where required, the Integrator shall provide all necessary breakout cable(s) to convert the 15 pin HD computer output connection to the appropriate input connection at the computer interface, switcher or other designated device. d) Computer interface connections shall accommodate audio signal connections with corresponding computer video signals. e) Clearly label all connection points and cables. f) All power and signal cables shall be neatly dressed with removable tie straps (e.g., Velcro) or other means for securing loose cables when not connected or in use. 3. Equipment Racks Equipment Racks shall be mounted in the Video Room and City Clerk's desk, as specified. The Integrator shall be responsible for coordinating the final location of the racks and electrical service required with the Electrical Contractor and Audiovisual Consultant. Additionally, the Integrator shall be required to coordinate final equipment room environmental provisions with the Electrical Contractor and Audiovisual Consultant, as to verify that there is proper HVAC for the specified equipment. 4. Furniture, Millwork & Cabinetry Except as identified in this Specification, all millwork and millwork modifications required to accommodate installation of Audiovisual equipment (including related cabling and connections) shall be provided by others. The Integrator shall coordinate with the Owner, furniture suppliers and millwork contractors as required to ensure that the Integrator clearly understands the intent of the equipment integration concepts and that the work of the other trades and suppliers is compatible with the work and equipment provided by the Integrator. This shall include workstation, lectern, credenza, and table locations which are provided by the Owner, and shall include, but not be limited to, the installation of cable pass - throughs, grommets, equipment (e.g., microphone, touch screen, tabletop pop -ups) mounting and location of electrical elements. E. Testing & Owner Acceptance Procedures 1. Installation Testing and Adjustment The Integrator shall perform all tests and adjustments, shall furnish all test equipment necessary and perform all work required to verify performance of the system in accordance with these Specifications and the Integrator's test plan (discussed in Section 1 -G: Documentation). When these initial tests and adjustments are completed, the Integrator shall notify the Audiovisual Consultant that the systems are in compliance with the Specifications and are ready and complete for Acceptance Tests. The scope of this work includes, but is not limited to the following: The acceptance testing process shall reference this Audiovisual Systems Specification for specific system requirements. There are two distinct procedures in the overall acceptance testing process outlined in this section, the Substantial Completion and the Final Acceptance. Often times, punch lists and incomplete work will preclude considering the first review of the systems for final acceptance. With this in mind, and the Substantial Completion acceptance testing is the first step towards acceptance and will give the Audiovisual Consultant and Owner a chance to create punch lists. Typically, Final Acceptance occurs after all punch lists are completed, the Owner has 35 had some time to work the systems (after the systems are Substantially Complete), final documentation is given to the owner, and all training is performed. Additionally, the Owner shall retain the right to hire a consultant to test the Audiovisual Systems. Delays to this consultant caused by incomplete work, improper wiring, or inoperative equipment may result in consultant's time being billed to the Integrator at current consulting rates. In the event further adjustments are required, or defective equipment is to be repaired or replaced, tests shall be suspended or continued at the option of the Owner. 2. Substantial Completion Audiovisual System Substantial Completion acceptance testing will consist of verifying overall system functionality, internal rack functions and wiring, external device functions and terminations, and device operation. The Owner and Audiovisual Consultant will spot check the systems installed by the Integrator in accordance with the standards and practices delineated in the Specification documentation. The following requirements will be considered the basis for establishing Substantial Completion of the Audiovisual Systems. a) Provide as -built equipment list. b) Provide redlined design drawings, rack layouts, spreadsheets, and any other relevant and current documentation. c) Integrator's Punch List: Provide an internally constructed punch list of known devices, cables, or systems that are incomplete. Audiovisual Consultant and the Owner will construct another punch list after the Substantial Completion acceptance testing is performed that is based on the inspection and the Integrator's internally constructed list. d) Test, adjust, balance, equalize, and calibrate all equipment (including OFE) as required for optimum performance. Establish and tabulate normal settings for all level controls. These settings shall be recorded in the maintenance manual for reference. e) Signal and Cable Testing and Documentation: Provide documentation on the point to point testing of all Fiber, CAT6, Audio, Video Inter -Room Cabling, and Stage Boxes provided by the Integrator. The following will be tested for each of the respective category of cable and /or signal types: (1) Audio: continuity, polarity, sound check (2) Speaker: impedance, polarity, proper zoning, buzz & rattle (frequency sweep), sound check, signal quality. (3) Video: signal continuity, proper routing. (4) Control: continuity & confirmation of control capability between designated control locations and control processors. (5) Fiber: OTDR (Optical Time Domain Reflectometer) testing, spot - check of functionality by the Integrator. (6) Data /Cat6: Bandwidth testing f) Quality of Installation: The areas around the racks and consoles should be free of debris and excess wires. Racks, consoles, and equipment should be free from dirt and grease. 36 g) Labeling and Terminations: All devices, including floor boxes, racks, termination panels, components, closets, panels, and cables should be terminated and labeled according to the Integrator's engineered plans. Visual spot- checking of wire dressing and terminations will be performed during the Acceptance Testing procedure. h) The Owner's technical staff shall be involved in recommending hardware and software system settings. The Integrator shall be responsible for providing the test equipment for the tests. i) System Functional Completion Requirements (1) The Owner is encouraged to bring in specific testing and operation scenarios that the Integrator may run through. (2) The individual areas of the building and the corresponding audiovisual shall be tested for compliance with system functional descriptions described in the Audiovisual Systems Performance Specification. j) System Technical Performance Completion Individual sub - system components of the integrated Audiovisual Systems shall meet or exceed the technical performance defined in the Specification. Testing of the performance of these systems is the responsibility of the Integrator and shall include: (1) During the acceptance testing procedures, each system will be spot checked to verify systems integration and inter- system operability. For instance, a laptop and /or microphone should be able to be plugged into an interface, and the audio routed to a desired speaker zone. (2) The Integrator shall supply any necessary testing equipment for acceptance testing including a continuity checker, laptop computers with software, patch cables, and video test equipment. Also, video signal must be able to be routed, patched, and scaled or scan converted. k) Architectural Integration Completion The Integrator shall be responsible for ensuring that the Audiovisual Systems are fully compatible with the architectural designs, equipment, fabrications, and conditions described in the Specification and fit and finish are acceptable to the Owner. 3. Final Acceptance The following items have been identified as items or systems that will not be required for Substantial Completion, but will be required for Final Acceptance of the systems. a) Completion of the Substantial Completion checklist b) Final Interface Design of the control system interface screens and software provided to Owner. c) Audio equalization and final levels d) Completion of all consultant and owner checklists 37 e) All Training performed and operator proficiency demonstrated. f) Review of maintenance agreement documentation, contact information, and procedures with the owner. g) Final As built Systems Documentation including spreadsheets, software, and drawings (in final CAD and PDF format) as defined in Section 1 -G Documentation. 38 Equipment List New Audio Equipment 1 Audio Digital Signal Processorw /Cobranet 5 Mic /Line Input Card 5 Mic/Line Output New Source Equipment New Computer, Mouse & Keyboard (On Rack 1 Shelf) 1 XM Satellite Radio Tuner 1 Network/Flash Based Audio Recorder /Playback 1 Professional CD Player Deck New Equipment for Street Side Rack B 1 8 Channel Audio Amplifier New Control System 1 System Controller 1 5 Rack Mounted Modero Touch Screen Audia Flex CM with Davinci Control Biamp Application Software Biamp IP -2 Biamp OP -2e HP TouchSmart 300z Sirius SR -1-12000 Marantz PMD580 Denon DN -C620 Crown CTs8200 AMX NI -3100 AMX NXD -CV5 Line Arrays For Quad: 2 Line Array Column Loudspeaker JBL CBT 100LA 39 2 Weather Proof Panel Cover JBL MTC -PC2 For Town Square Light Poles: 2 Line Array Column Loudspeaker JBL CBT 50LA 2 Weather Proof Panel Cover JBL MTC -PC2 DSP and Amplification 1/0 cards for owner's existing DSP (Biamp AudiaFlex) X 1 2- channel mic /line input card Biamp IP -2 2 2- channel mic /line output card Biamp OP -2e 1 8 Channel Audio Amplifier Crown CTs8200 Wireless Microphones, Antennas 1 Professional Dual Wireless Microphone System Shure 2 Dynamic Vocal Microphone Shure 2 Microphone Stand Shure 2 Microphone Clip Shure Add Alternates For Quad: 2 Additional Quad Line Array Column Loudspeaker JBL 2 Weather Proof Panel Cover JBL 2 2- channel mic /line output card Biamp 40 ULXP24D /BETA58- BETA58A MS -10C A55M CBT 70JE MTC -PC2 OP -2e X X X __ PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Western Audio Visual Corp will conduct this project for the fixed -fee amount $71,478.75. These fees are a combination of equipment and professional services. The equipment and professional services will be phased over the period of this contract as depicted in the table below. Payment Schedule Payment Number Schedule Amount Description 1 Upon execution of the Agreement $23,826.25 33% payment 2 Upon completion of the Project $23,826.25 33% payment 3 30 Days after completion of the Project $23,826.25 33% payment 41 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Title: OLD TOWN SOUND SYSTEM - RETROFIT PRIORITY: II Project Type: RDA Description: Design and install a new Old Town Sound System with the head end in the Old Town Civic Center (OTCC). The system should be capable of supporting simultaneous broadcasts or separate instances between Old Town Front and the Town Plaza. Department: Information System - Account No. 210.165.515 Scope of Project: This project will include a preliminary study that identifies the Old Town sound system requirements. This study will result in a competitive request for quotation for vendor selection. The goal of this project is to move the sound system head end, replace the speakers and amplifiers, and provide discreet separation between events on Front Street and the Town Plaza Benefit: This system will replace obsolete equipment and upgrade the system to support the new Old Town venues. It will also integrate system control in the new Civic Center and allow discrete separation to support multiple events by providing options for customized sound zones and improved user interface. Project Cost: Actuals to Date 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 Future Years Total Project Cost Administration $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Construction $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Design $ 15,000 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 Fixtures/Fum/Equip $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Installation $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Preliminary Study $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Totals $ $ 15,000 $ 135,000 $ - $ - $ $ $ 150,000 Source of Funds: RDA (Bonds) Total Funding: $ Future O & M Cost: N/A $ 15,000 $ 135,000 $ 150,000 $ 15,000 $ 135,000 $ $ $ $ $ 150,000 175 PUBLIC HEARING Item No. 22 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: A comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 153 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND 700 FEET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AND BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND THE WEST SIDE OF PUJOL STREET (LR10 -0011) 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING GENERAL PLAN MAPS TO DESIGNATE THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TERRITORY AS SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ( "SPI "), ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES (LOCATED SOUTH OF FIRST STREET), REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES (LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SIXTH STREET AND PUJOL STREET), AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO DEFINE SPI, AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO ADD PROVISIONS REGARDING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LR10 -011) Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TE MECULA APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LR10 -0011) Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP (LR10 -0011) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCES: Two ordinances are to be adopted for Old Town Specific Plan. The first Ordinance adopts the Specific Plan Amendment providing for a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan. Primary changes to the proposed Specific Plan are outlined below. Downtown Core — The Tourist Retail Core land use district identified in the existing Specific Plan has been re -named to "Downtown Core." The Downtown Core allows for four stories if at least one floor is residential and /or office and provides parking, and the proposed plan also includes a Hotel Overlay that may be constructed at up to eight stories if developed with a full service hotel containing a restaurant and conference facilities accommodating at least 1,000 people. Residential /Limited Mixed Use — The existing plan designates the area along Moreno Road as Community Commercial and Highway Tourist land use districts, and designates the areas south of the Mary Phillips Senior Center as the Tourist Serving Residential land use district. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as "Residential /Limited Mixed Use" districts. The existing Specific Plan allows for residential uses in the area currently designated as Tourist Serving Residential, but does not allow for residential uses in the Moreno Road area. The Residential /Limited Mixed Use district expands the option for residential development by allowing for residential throughout the district. The existing Specific Plan allows for two -story buildings in the Community Commercial and Tourist Serving Residential land use districts, and allows forthree -story buildings in the Highway Tourist district. The proposed Specific Plan allows for expanded building floor space and greater flexibility for the use of property in this district by allowing up to three stories throughout the district, and by allowing a full service hotel (with a Conditional Use Permit) of up to eight stories in the Moreno Road area. As with the existing Specific Plan, the proposed plan would allow for commercial uses throughout the Residential /Limited Mixed Use district. Neighborhood Residential — The existing plan designates the area along the east side of Pujol Street as High Density Residential and the area along the west side of Pujol Street as Medium Density Residential land use districts. The High Density Residential district allows for up to 20 units per acre and the Medium Density Residential district allow for up to 12 units per acre. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as the "Neighborhood Residential" land use district and allows for residential uses at a density of 20 to 35 units per acre throughout the district. The second Ordinance adopts a Zone Change that would result in the addition of three parcels to the Old Town Specific Plan boundary. These parcels are located south of First Street, between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek, totaling 2.4 acres. These parcels would be included in the Downtown Core land use district of the Specific Plan. Additionally, the proposed Zone Change would remove 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. This parcel would be zoned High Density Residential (H) in conformance with its current General Plan land use designation of High Density Residential (H). BACKGROUND: In early 2007, the City Council, Planning Commission and Old Town Local Review Board directed Planning and Redevelopment staff to examine concerns regarding the community's vision for Old Town, particularly with regard to intensity of building height, building mass and adequacyof parking. In response to this direction, six workshops were held with the communityfrom June to December 2007 to solicit feedback from residents, businesses, property owners and the development community to develop the community's vision for Old Town. Based on this vision, City Council authorized staff to prepare a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan in March, 2008. Staff has continued to work with the community, the Old Town Specific Plan Steering Committee, and the Redevelopment Agency sub - committee to develop a draft amendment to the Specific Plan. Staff has completed the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and the 45 -day review period for the Draft EIR was completed on April 14, 2010. In addition to the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Program Environmental Impact Report are also proposed. DISCUSSION: General Plan Amendment The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the Land Use Designations for the proposed Old Town Specific Plan area to a single new General Plan designation titled "Specific Plan Implementation." The purpose of the Specific Plan Implementation land use district would be to ensure consistency between the unique mixed -use development characteristics of the Old Town Specific Plan area and the General Plan by referring directly to the Specific Plan for the intended uses and development characteristics for this area. Additionally, text changes to the Circulation Element of the General Plan are proposed to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a specific plan. This would address recommendations developed for the Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared for the project's EIR, which recommended the use of traffic signals as a traffic mitigation measure, orthat the City accepts levels of service E and F inside the Old Town area at the intersections along Old Town Front Street. Due to the community's goal for Old Town to develop as a pedestrian oriented area, a series of traffic signals along Old Town Front Street in the Old Town area would not be desirable. Furthermore, accepting levels of service E and F along these specific intersections will assist in creating a greater balance between pedestrian and vehicular activity. Specific Plan Amendment The project entails two Ordinances, including a Specific Plan Amendment for a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan and a Zone Change to amend the City's Zoning Map. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a comprehensive amendmentto address concerns that the current Specific Plan does not adequately address issues related to building height and massing and that recently constructed buildings do not respect the historic character of Old Town. The areas of the Specific Plan that address these elements of Old Town have been updated and expanded, and criteria has been added for elements that are not addressed in the current Specific Plan. Additionally, form -based code principles have been incorporated into the Specific Plan, primarily in the Development Standards and Design Guidelines sections of the Specific Plan. These sections have been completely revised and contain the parameters for development that will facilitate accomplishment of the design goals for Old Town. The use of form -based code principles will result in less emphasis being placed on permitted land uses and a greater emphasis being placed on building and street forms. Another area of emphasis for the proposed plan includes encouraging mixed -use buildings to help achieve a balance between commercial and residential square footage in Old Town. Regulations and standards based on form -based code principles, presented in words, illustrations, and photographs have been incorporated into the proposed Specific Plan to designate the appropriate form and scale (and therefore, character) of development in Old Town. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a comprehensive amendmentto address concerns that the current Specific Plan does not adequately address issues related to building height and massing and that recently constructed buildings do not respect the historic character of Old Town. Primary changes to the proposed Specific Plan are outlined below Downtown Core — The Tourist Retail Core land use district identified in the existing Specific Plan has been re -named to "Downtown Core." The Downtown Core allows forfour stories if at least one floor is residential and /or office and provides parking, and the proposed plan also includes a Hotel Overlaythat may be constructed at up to eight stories if developed with a full service hotel containing a restaurant and conference facilities accommodating at least 1,000 people. Residential /Limited Mixed Use —The existing plan designates the area along Moreno Road as Community Commercial and Highway Tourist land use districts, and designates the areas south of the Mary Phillips Senior Center as the Tourist Serving Residential land use district. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as 'Residential /Limited Mixed Use" districts. The existing Specific Plan allows for residential uses in the area currently designated as Tourist Serving Residential, but does not allow for residential uses in the Moreno Road area. The Residential /Limited Mixed Use district expands the option for residential development by allowing for residential throughout the district. The existing Specific Plan allows for two -story buildings in the Community Commercial and Tourist Serving Residential land use districts, and allows for three -story buildings in the Highway Tourist district. The proposed Specific Plan allows for expanded building floor space and greater flexibility for the use of property in this district by allowing up to three stories throughout the district, and by allowing a full service hotel (with a Conditional Use Permit) of up to eight stories in the Moreno Road area. As with the existing Specific Plan, the proposed plan would allow for commercial uses throughout the Residential /Limited Mixed Use district. Neighborhood Residential — The existing plan designates the area along the east side of Pujol Street as High Density Residential and the area along the west side of Pujol Street as Medium Density Residential land use districts. The High Density Residential district allows for up to 20 units per acre and the Medium Density Residential district allow for up to 12 units per acre. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as the "Neighborhood Residential" land use district and allows for residential uses at a density of 20 to 35 units per acre throughout the district. The second Ordinance adopts a Zone Change that would result in the addition of three parcels to the Old Town Specific Plan boundary. These parcels are located south of First Street, between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek, totaling 2.4 acres. These parcels would be included in the Downtown Core land use district of the Specific Plan. Additionally, the proposed Zone Change would remove 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. This parcel would be zoned High Density Residential (H) in conformance with its current General Plan land use designation of High Density Residential (H). Program Environmental Impact Report A Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and distributed to responsible agencies and interested groups and individuals and was made available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days. The City of Temecula received written comments and responded to each comment in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). A copy of the City's response has been provided to commenting agencies as required by State law. To allow for additional potential traffic mitigation measures, staff is proposing to revise sections of the Draft EIR to specify that the need and timing for implementation of traffic mitigation will be determined by subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses and to allow for enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the Mercedes Street/Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street, either in addition to the roundabouts discussed in the Draft EIR, or instead of the roundabouts as determined by subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses. These revisions also delete the southern connection of Mercedes Street to Old Town Front Street /First Street/Santiago Road as this connection has been determined to be infeasible. The environmental analysis identified one area where impacts were not considered to be significant (land use) and five areas where potentially significant impacts were identified which could be avoided or mitigated. These five areas include aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology, utilities, and traffic and transportation. Three impact areas were identified as resulting in an unavoidable, significant impact and include the following: • Construction, project operation, and cumulative air impacts • Stage goals for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions • Construction, traffic, and cumulative noise impacts In accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council must adopt Statements of Overriding Consideration priorto approving the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. The Statements of Overriding Consideration state that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. Old Town Local Review Board and Planning Commission Recommendations Staff presented the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft EIR to the Old Town Local Review Board on April 12, 2010, and the Board unanimously recommended approval of the Draft Specific Plan to the Planning Commission and City Council. On April 21, 2010, staff presented the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft EIR to the Planning Commission, which unanimously recommended certification of the Draft EIR along with adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations and approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Zone Change. FISCAL IMPACT: The Specific Plan outlines infrastructure improvements for future projects that are not currently specified in the Capital Improvement Program Budget, butthatwill be funded in future years as warranted by demand for these improvements. These improvements include roadway improvements, traffic control features, pedestrian oriented circulation improvements, and public parking facilities. Approval of these infrastructure improvements and appropriation of funds for their design and construction would occur through separate actions. ATTACHMENTS: Final Environmental Impact Report (sent separately from Agenda Report) Amended Old Town Specific Plan (sent separately from Agenda Report) Resolution Certifying Environmental Impact Report Resolution Adopting General Plan Amendment Ordinance Adopting Specific Plan Amendment Ordinance Adopting Zoning Map Amendment Planning Commission April 21, 2010 Staff Report RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING THE PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, ADOPTING FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 153 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND 700 FEET SOUTH OF FIRST STREET, AND BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND THE WEST SIDE OF PUJOL STREET (LR10- 0011). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate into the Old Told Specific Plan area an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and to exclude from the Old Town Specific Plan area 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area consisting of approximately 153 acres generally located between Rancho California Road and 700 feet south of First Street, and between Interstate 15 and the west side of Pujol Street. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within that designation are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. All of these revisions are collectively referred to as the "Project." D. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs. § 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA") E. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. F. On July 10, 2009, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project, including land owners, tenants, and business owners within the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan, and land owners and tenants located within 600 feet of the Specific Plan boundaries. The NOP requested that comments on the topics to be analyzed in the Draft EIR for the Project be submitted to the City by August 12, 2009. On July 21, 2009, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082(c)(1), the City sponsored a public scoping meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. G. In response to the NOP, written comments were received from various individuals and organizations. These comment letters assisted the City in formulating the analysis in the Draft EIR. H. The City's EIR consultants thereafter prepared, in accordance with CEQA, a Draft Program EIR for the Project (State Clearinghouse Number 2009071049). I. Upon completion of the Draft Program EIR in February 2010, the City initiated a public comment period by filing a Notice of Completion with the State Office of Planning and Research on March 1, 2010. The City also published a Notice of Availability for the Draft Program EIR in The Californian, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. J. The Draft Program EIR was circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through and including April 14 2010. Copies of the Draft Program EIR were sent to various public agencies, as well as to organizations and individuals requesting copies. In addition, the City placed copies of the Draft Program EIR at the City's library and made copies available for review at the City offices and on the City's website. K. In response to the Draft Program EIR, written comments were received from various agencies, individuals, and organizations. The City responded to all written comments. Those comments and the responses thereto are included as part of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report /Response to Comments document (Final Program EIR). The Final Program EIR consists of the DPEIR, Comments and E Responses to Comments, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Errata listing changes made to the Draft Program EIR in response to comments. L. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21092.5, not later than May 1, 2010, the City prepared and provided to all commenting public agencies its responses to all written comments. M. The Planning Commission, at its regularly scheduled meeting on April 21, 2010, considered the Project and environmental review at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff presented its report and interested persons had an opportunity to be heard and to present evidence regarding the Project and the Draft Program EIR. N. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 10 -06 recommending that the City Council certify the Final Program EIR prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, adopt Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. The Planning Commission also adopted Resolution No. 10 -07, thereby recommending that the City Council take various actions, including adoption of a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Specific Plan Amendment related to the approval of the Project. O. Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that the City, before approving a project for which an environmental impact report is required, make one or more of the following written finding(s) for each significant effect identified in the EIR accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding: 1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR; or, 2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency; or, 3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR. P. Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines requires that if a project will cause significant unavoidable adverse impacts, the City must adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations prior to approving the project. A Statement of Overriding Considerations states that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. 3 Q. Environmental impacts identified in the Final Program EIR that are found to be less than significant and do not require mitigation are described in Section IV of Exhibit A to this Resolution. Exhibit A, Findings and Facts in Support of Findings, is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. R. Environmental impacts identified in the Final Program EIR that are found to be less than significant through the imposition of mitigation are described in Section V of Exhibit A to this Resolution. S. Environmental impacts identified in the Final Program EIR as potentially significant but which cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level despite the imposition of all feasible mitigation measures are described in Section VI of Exhibit A to this Resolution. T. Alternatives to the Project that might eliminate or reduce significant environmental impacts are described in Section VII of Exhibit A of this Resolution. U. A discussion of the project benefits identified by City staff and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the environmental impacts that cannot be fully mitigated to a less than significant level are set forth in Exhibit B to this Resolution, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. V. Public Resources Code section 21081.6 requires the City to prepare and adopt a mitigation monitoring and reporting program for any project for which mitigation measures have been imposed to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit C, and is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. W. Prior to taking action the City Council has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered the information and data in the administrative record, as well as oral and written testimony presented to it during meetings and hearings. No comments or any additional information submitted to the City have produced any substantial new information requiring additional environmental review or re- circulation of the EIR under CEQA because no new significant environmental impacts were identified, nor was any substantial increase in the severity of any previously disclosed environmental impacts identified. X. Custodian of Records. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is the custodian of records, and the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are located at the Office of the City Clerk, City of Temecula, 43200 Business Park Dr., Temecula, California 92590. Section 2. Substantive Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula, California does hereby: A. Declare that the City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which 0 includes the Final Program Environmental Impact Report, the written and oral comments on the Draft Program EIR, staff reports and responses to comments incorporated into the Final Program EIR, and all testimony related to environmental issues. B. Determine that the Final Program EIR fully analyzes and discloses the potential impacts of the Project, and that those impacts have been mitigated or avoided to the extent feasible for the reasons set forth in the Findings attached hereto as Exhibit A, with the exception of those impacts found to be significant and unmitigable as discussed therein. C. Declare that the Final Program EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City. The City Council further finds that the additional information provided in the staff reports, in comments on the Draft Program EIR, the responses to comments on the Draft Program EIR, and the evidence presented in written and oral testimony does not constitute new information requiring recirculation of the EIR under CEQA. None of the information presented has deprived the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial environmental impact of the Project or a feasible mitigation measure or alternative that the City has declined to implement. D. Certify the Final Program EIR as being in compliance with CEQA. The City Council further adopts the findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; and adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. The City Council further determines that all of the findings made in this Resolution (including Exhibit A) are based upon the information and evidence set forth in the Final Program EIR and upon other substantial evidence that has been presented at the hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, and in the record of the proceedings. The City Council further finds that each of the overriding benefits stated in Exhibit B, by itself, would justify proceeding with the Project despite any significant unavoidable impacts identified in the Final Program EIR or alleged to be significant in the record of proceedings. E. The City Council hereby imposes as a condition on the Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan Project each mitigation measure specified in Exhibit C, and directs City staff to implement and to monitor the mitigation measures as described in Exhibit C. 5 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: IG 1 011�Ko1l1►NllNdiIAdil:l:4:& 1 ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 2 Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT A Findings and Facts in Support of Findings I. Introduction. The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code § 21000, et seq. ( "CEQA ") and the State CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15000, etseq. (the "Guidelines ") provide that no public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an environmental impact report has been certified that identifies one or more significant effects on the environment caused by the project unless the public agency makes one or more of the following findings: A. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project, which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in the Program EIR. B. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. C. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Program EIR.' Pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings in connection with the proposed Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (the "Project "), as more fully described in the Final Program EIR. These findings are based upon written and oral evidence included in the record of these proceedings, comments on the Draft Program EIR and the written responses thereto, and reports presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council by City staff and the City's environmental consultants. II. Project Objectives. As set forth in the Program EIR, objectives that the City of Temecula seeks to achieve with this Project (the "Project Objectives ") are as follows: A. Update the current OTSP to provide enhanced desired services within the plan area to both City residents and visitors while being compatible with the nearby residential area; 1 Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21081; 14 Cal. Code Regs. § 15091. A -1 B. Incorporate form -based code principles to more clearly define development regulations, to better facilitate pedestrian friendly development through building placement and streetscapes, and to encourage mixed -use development within Old Town; C. Respect the history of the OTSP area while fitting with current economics, accommodating greater residential density, and encouraging a variety of architectural styles; D. Implement significant new investment in the Old Town area to help promote rapid growth in Temecula Valley and develop a renewed interest in town centers and mixed -use development; E. Enhance the quality of life of Temecula residents by balancing economic development objectives with protection of the environment and the health and safety of the community; and F. Promote economic activity within the City to maintain a healthy economy, provide revenue for high - quality municipal services and infrastructure maintenance and improvements, and preserve the unique character of Temecula. III. Effects Determined to be Less Than Significant /No Impact in the Initial Study The City of Temecula conducted an Initial Study in June 2009 to determine significant effects of the Project. In the course of this evaluation certain impacts were found to be less than significant due to the inability of a project of this scope to create such impacts or the absence of project characteristics producing effects of this type. The following issue areas were determined not to be significant for the reasons set forth in the Initial Study and were not analyzed in the EIR: (A) Agriculture Resources; (B) Biological Resources; (C) Cultural Resources with the exception of those areas studied in the February 2010 Program EIR; (D) Geology and Soils; (E) Hazards and Hazardous Materials; (F) Mineral Resources; (G) Population and Housing; (H) Public Services; and (1) Recreation. Impacts related to the following issue areas were found to be potentially significant and were studied in the Program EIR: (A) Aesthetics; (B) Air Quality; (C) Global Warming /Climate Change (D) Cultural Resources; (E) Hydrology and Water Quality; (F) Land Use and Planning; (G) Noise; (H) Utilities and Services; (1) Traffic and Circulation. A. In July 10, 2009, in accordance with CEQA Guideline Section 15082, the City published a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR) and circulated it to governmental agencies, organizations, and persons that may be interested in the Project, including land owners, tenants, and business owners within the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan, and land owners and tenants located within 600 feet of the Specific Plan boundaries. The NOP requested comments by August 12, 2009. On July 21, 2009, in accordance with CEQA Section 15082(c)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City sponsored a public scoping P% meeting to obtain comments from interested parties on the scope of the Draft EIR. No comments were received on areas other than those found to be potentially significant in the Initial Study. IV. The Draft Program EIR completed in February 2010 found that the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact without the imposition of mitigation on a number of environmental topic areas. The less than significant environmental impact determination was made for each of the following topic areas listed below, based on the more expansive discussions contained in the Program EIR. A. Aesthetics 1. The project's development would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings from a State Scenic Highway. 2. The project's development would not potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. B. Air Quality 1. The project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan. 2. The project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial amount of people. 3. Increased localized carbon monoxide would not be generated from vehicular traffic during operation. C. Cultural Resources 1. Implementation of the Specific Plan Amendment would not cause a substantial adverse change to areas of traditional cultural significance to local Native American individuals and groups. D. Hydrology 1. The proposed project would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted). A -3 2. The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. 3. The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site. 4. The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality 6. The proposed project would not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map. 7. The proposed project would not place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows. 8. The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. 9. The proposed project would not be inundated by a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. E. Land Use and Planning 1. Project implementation would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the General Plan, Specific Plan, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. F. Utilities and Services 1. The project would not require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. 2. The project would not result in insufficient water supplies from existing entitlements or need new or expanded entitlements. =I 3. The project would not result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments. 4. The project would comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. 5. The proposed project would not require or result in the construction of new electrical and gas facilities or the expansion of existing facilities where the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. G. Traffic and Transportation 1. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in inadequate vehicular and emergency access. Project implementation would not result in inadequate parking capacity. V. Potentially Significant Environmental Impacts Determined to be Mitigated to a Less Than Significant Level The Draft Program EIR identified the potential for the Project to cause significant environmental impacts in the areas of aesthetics, air quality, global warming /climate change, cultural resources, hydrology, land use and planning, noise, utilities and services, and transportation and traffic. With the exception of specific impacts to air quality, global warming /climate change, and noise discussed in Section VI below, measures have been identified that would mitigate all of the impacts in this section to a less than significant level. The City Council finds that the feasible mitigation measures for the Project identified in the Final Program EIR would reduce the Project's impacts to a less than significant level, with the exception of those unmitigable impacts discussed in Section VI below. The City Council adopts all of the feasible mitigation measures for the Project described in the Final Program EIR as conditions of approval of the Project and incorporates those into the Project, as discussed more fully in Exhibit C. A. Aesthetics New Source of Light and Glare The Project could result in taller buildings and additional lighting needs which could adversely affect daytime or nighttime views of the area. The use of exterior lighting for security and aesthetic illumination may contribute to ambient nighttime lighting conditions. Reflective light could be caused by sunlight or artificial light reflecting from finished surfaces such as window glass, or other reflective A -5 materials. As described below, these impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant environmental effects of light and glare. Specifically, the following measures have been included to ensure that the Project's potential light and glare impacts remain less than significant. Measure 3.1 -3a: The applicant shall ensure that all lighting fixtures shall contain "sharp cut -off' fixtures, and shall be fitted with flat glass lenses and internal and external shielding. Measure 3.1 -3b: The applicant shall ensure that all fixtures shall be parallel with the finished grade of the project site; no fixtures shall be tilted above a 90- degree angle. Measure 3.1 -3c: The applicant shall ensure that site lighting systems shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and night light /security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting system utilizing a time clock, photocell, and low voltage relays. Measure 3.1 -3d layout of the site shall take advantage and off —site architectural massing to k The applicant shall ensure that design and of landscaping, on -site architectural massing, lock light sources and reflection from cars. Measure 3.1 -3e: The applicant shall submit a lighting plan and photometric plan to be reviewed by the City of Temecula. The lighting plan shall include design features (such as those mentioned above) to minimize impacts of light and glare on the surrounding area. Measure 3.1 -3f: The City shall complete a post - installation inspection to ensure that the site is not excessively illuminated (such that lighting is not creating excessive glare, unreasonably competing for the public's attention or creating any roadway safety hazard) and that lighting sources are properly shielded. Measure 3.1 -3g: In order to mitigate potential impacts to the Mount Palomar Observatory, all lighting plans shall be reviewed by the City to assure utilization of low pressure sodium vapor lamps; step -down lighting techniques; shielding to prevent upward and outward illumination; and compliance with the County Ordinance No. 655. Measure 3.1 -3h: The Specific Plan Amendment shall prohibit the use of highly reflective construction materials on exterior wall surfaces. The exterior of permitted buildings shall be constructed of materials such as high performance tinted Em- non - mirrored glass, painted metal panels and pre -cast concrete or fabricated wall surfaces. (b) Facts in Support of Findings The Project will be required to comply with existing Riverside County Mount Palomar Ordinance No. 655 requiring lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. In additional, generally accepted standards have been established by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, a collection of engineers, architects, scientists and other professionals who aim to disseminate information for the improvement of the lighted environment. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.1 -3a through 3.1 -3h (above), potential light and glare impacts associated with the project will be less than significant. B. Cultural Resources 1. Impacts to Unknown Cultural Resources The proposed Project has the potential to impact unknown cultural resources on the portions within the Old Town Specific Plan area. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to unknown cultural resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measures will ensure that no significant impacts occur to unknown cultural resources. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which requires that all areas slated for development or other ground- disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a 1 -mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) for archaeological resources on a project- specific basis prior to the City's approval of site - specific project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseho Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the Project Archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the Project Archaeologist during testing and evaluation. All such A -7 surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to Project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground - disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined, by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1b: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that during construction, should prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. All cultural materials recovered will be, as necessary and in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, subject to scientific analysis and documentation according to current professional standards. Sacred and ceremonial items shall not be subject to any scientific analysis. Upon completion of the archaeological study, but no later than 45 days after completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined, by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, pursuant to MM 3.4 -1 a, to be sensitive for cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered during 1m3 grading, the Project Applicant, the Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred mitigation, if feasible. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Previously unknown and unrecorded archaeological resources could exist anywhere within the Specific Plan area, and may be unearthed during excavation and grading activities for individual projects. This can occur even in already developed areas, as older buildings are known to have often been built on top of or within archaeological deposits. Therefore, any future development within the overall project area not previously assessed for cultural resources could result in the adverse impact to unknown cultural resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.4 -1 a and 3.4 -1 a would minimize this impact to a less than significant level. 2. Impacts to Historic Resources The proposed Project could adversely affect known cultural resources, including unique archaeological resources and historic resources in Specific Plan areas containing buildings older than 50 years. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect to known cultural resources. Specifically, the following mitigation measure will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -2a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -2, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that all areas slated for development or other ground- disturbing activities in the Specific Plan Area which contain structures 50 years old or older be surveyed and evaluated for their potential historic significance prior to the City's approval of project plans. The survey shall be f�] carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Architectural History. If potentially significant resources are encountered during the survey, demolition or substantial alteration of such resources identified shall be avoided. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall prepare a treatment plan to include, but not limited to, photo - documentation and public interpretation of the resource area. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Structures that are fifty years or older may not have been comprehensively surveyed and evaluated and it is possible they may be eligible as historic resources if other criteria apply, such as significant associations with important events, people, or have high architectural merit. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.4 -2a would require that structures 50 years old or older be evaluated for significance prior to the implementation of specific projects in order to minimize this impact to a less than significant level. 3. Impacts to unidentified Human Remains The proposed Project has the potential to cause an impact to human remains in the event human remains are discovered. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant impact on any potential discovery of human remains. Specifically, mitigation measure 3.4 -4a will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Guidelines, and the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that if human skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains. If the County coroner determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The NAHC will then identify the person(s) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendents regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. A -10 (b) Facts in Support of Findings There is no indication that any particular site in the Project area has been used for human burial purposes in the recent or distant past. Therefore, it is unlikely that human remains would be encountered as a result of the proposed Project. However, in the unlikely event that human remains are discovered, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, the human remains could be inadvertently damaged, which could be a significant impact. However, this impact would be minimized by implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.4 -4a, as set forth above. 4. Paleontological Resources The proposed Project is underlain by the Pauba Formation and younger and older Quaternary Alluvium. The Pauba Formation and older Quaternary Alluvium have a high paleontological sensitivity and therefore the potential to cause a significant impact on paleontological resources. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect on paleontological resources. Specifically, mitigation measure 3.4 -5a will ensure a less than significant impact. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5a: The Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states that in the event that paleontological resources are discovered, the project proponent will notify a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist will document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If fossil or fossil bearing deposits are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find will be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995)). The paleontologist will notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist will prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important. The plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Temecula's General Plan (implementation measure OS -26) requires that a paleontologist be retained to observe grading activities in areas where the probable presence of paleontological resources is identified. However, significant paleontological resources can be uncovered even in areas of low sensitivity, and it is possible that ground- disturbing construction activities associated with implementation A -11 of the Specific Plan Amendment could result in the inadvertent discovery of paleontological resources, which could be a significant impact. Therefore, mitigation measure 3.4 -5a will be implemented to ensure any potential impacts to paleontological resources are minimized to be less than significant. C. Hydrology 1. Impacts to water quality or waste discharge The proposed Project has the potential to cause an impact on water quality or waste discharge upon construction and operation of developments within the project area. Construction could include grading and other earth moving activities exposing soils to erosion, which could lead to erosion and runoff. In addition, the incremental increase of development over the span of 20 -30 years is likely to contribute to pollution such as motor oil or fertilizers being washed away during rainfall or when a street, walkway, or parkway surface is being cleaned. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the impacts to less than significant. Specifically, mitigation measure 3.5 -1 shall be implemented, as required by applicable local, state or federal law or regulations, to comply with NPDES regulations. Mitigation Measure 3.5 -1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit for individual projects, the project developer shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) with California to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) General Construction Permit (Municipal Code, Chapter Chapter 8.24). This would include the preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) incorporating construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) for control of erosion and sedimentation contained in stormwater runoff. The project developer shall be required by the Stormwater /Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls of the City of Temecula's Municipal Code to submit and implement a SWPP using BMPs that would effectively reduce or prevent discharge of pollutants into receiving waters. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Development projects within the Amended Old Town Specific Plan will be required by the Stormwater /Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls of the City of Temecula's Municipal Code to submit and implement a SWPPP using BMPs that would effectively reduce or prevent the discharge of pollutants into receiving waters. The Mitigation Measure also requires preparation of plans that will control the effects of stormwater runoff, and therefore will reduce potential impacts to less than significant. D. Noise A -12 1. Construction activities could result in exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration. The potential use of a large bulldozer for project construction generates vibration levels of up to 0.089 PPV or 87 RMS at a distance of 25 feet, which exceeds the human annoyance response level of 80 RMS. The location of construction relative to the nearest sensitive receptor or historic building has yet to be determined, and will depend on the specific location of the individual project proposed within the Old Town Specific Plan area. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that would lessen the significant ground borne vibration impacts associated with construction activities. Specifically, measures have been included to reduce noise impacts from construction activities associated with the project that would result in exposure of sensitive receptors to excessive levels of ground -borne vibration within the Project area to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measures 3.7 -1a through 3.7 -d and 3.7 -2. Measure 3.7 -1a: The applicant shall ensure, as specified in City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94 -25, that no construction may occur within one - quarter (1 /4) of a mile of any occupied residence during the following hours: 6:30 PM to 6:30 AM, Monday through Friday. Before 7:00 AM or after 6:30 PM, Saturday. At any time on Sunday or any nationally recognized holiday. Measure 3.7 -1b: The applicant shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Measure 3.7 -1c: The applicant shall ensure that all construction staging shall be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings. Measure 3.7 -1d: The applicant shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. Mitigation Measure 3.7 -2a: The construction contractor will conduct crack surveys before construction activities that could cause architectural damage to nearby structures. The survey will include any historic buildings or buildings in poor condition within 15 feet of construction. The surveys will be done by photographs, video tape, or visual inventory, and will include inside as well as outside locations. All existing cracks in walls, floors, and driveways should be documented with sufficient detail for comparison after construction to determine whether actual vibration damage occurred. A post- construction survey should be conducted to document the condition A -13 of the surrounding buildings after the construction is complete. The construction contractor would be liable for construction vibration damage to adjacent structures. (a) Facts in Support of Findings Development projects within the Amended Old Town Specific Plan will be required to conduct crack surveys before and after construction activities that could cause damage to historic buildings or buildings in poor conditions within 15 feet of construction. Further, Mitigation Measures are provided that monitor construction hours within 1/4 mile of any occupied residence and that all construction equipment have properly operating mufflers. These mitigation measures combined with the City Noise ordinance will address construction noise issues to ensure that vibration impacts would be less than significant. Noise levels in excess of allowable Noise Standards The proposed Project has the potential to expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plans or noise ordinances, or applicable standards of other agencies. Examples include heating, ventilating, air conditioning equipment noise, and loading dock /truck delivery truck noises. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the noise level impacts so that operational noise levels do not exceed applicable noise standards and the impact would therefore be less than significant. Measure 3.7 -3a: Building equipment (e.g., HVAC units) shall be located away from nearby residences, on building rooftops, and properly shielded by either the rooftop parapet or within an enclosure that effectively blocks the line of sight of the source from the nearest receptors. The resultant HVAC noise level shall not exceed 45 dBA at the nearest receptors. Measure 3.7 -3b: In order to avoid noise - sensitive hours, commercial and retail shall prohibit loading and unloading activities between the nighttime hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. Measure 3.7 -3c: To further address the nuisance impact of loading dock/truck delivery noise, all loading areas for commercial and retail uses shall be located at the rear or sides of buildings within the commercial and mixed -use districts, where noise can be directed away from residential uses within the mixed use areas of the project. (b) Facts in Support of Findings A -14 Ensuring that building equipment (e.g., HVAC units) is located away from nearby residences, on building rooftops, and properly shielded by either the rooftop parapet or within an enclosure that effectively blocks the line of sight of the source from the nearest receptors would result in reduced HVAC noise levels not to exceed any applicable standard. Furthermore, prohibiting loading and unloading activities between the nighttime hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM and locating all loading areas for commercial and retail uses at the rear or sides of buildings within the commercial and mixed -use districts will direct noise away from residential uses within the mixed use areas of the project and effectively will reduce any noise impacts so that they are less than significant. E. Utilities and Service 1. Adverse physical impacts associated with new or physically altered parks and recreational facilities. The proposed Project has the potential to allow for an increase in residential population of approximately 4,114 new residents. In order to maintain the City's ratio of five acres of parkland per 1,000 residents, the proposed Specific Plan area would need to contribute 205.7 acres of parkland /open space to the City's inventory of park space. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the parkland impacts so that all development contributes its fair share to the maintenance or provision of public services, and therefore impacts will be less than significant. Measure 3.8 -1a: The City shall continue to implement its local code that incorporates standards for parkland dedication and development. The City requires (1) the dedication of parkland or the payment of in -lieu fees and the development of recreation facilities for all new development; and (2) developers of residential projects greater than 200 units must dedicate land based on the park acre standard of five acres of usable parkland to 1,000 residents. Measure 3.8 -1b: The City will identify potential sites for additional park land, monitor demand for park land and facilities concurrent with development approvals, and prioritize potential parkland acquisitions, expansions, and improvements within the five year Capital Improvement Program, consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Measure 3.8 -1c: The City shall 1) implement policies and standards of the Parks and Recreation and Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plans, including trail classifications, design standards, implementation mechanisms, and capital improvement programming; and 2) ensure that bike routes are provided or reserved concurrent with new development. A -15 (b) Facts in Support of Findings Although the additional open space provided by the amended Specific Plan would not contribute towards the parks and recreational facilities requirement, this additional open space area would still have a beneficial affect on the City and OTSP area. Overall, due to the improvements proposed by the Specific Plan Amendment (improved landscaping and walkways, etc.) and implementation of the Mitigation Measures 3.8 -1 through 3.8 -3 listed above, impacts would be less than significant. Furthermore, all development projects must contribute their fair share to the maintenance or provision of public services through payment of the City's Development Impact Fee. 2. Impacts from construction of wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. Implementation of the proposed Specific Plan would cause a substantial increase in the demand for wastewater conveyance services, and necessitate the alternation of existing facilities to meet treatment capacity expectations. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the impacts from construction of wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities to less than significant. Measure 3.8 -3a: Prior to construction in any undeveloped areas, EMWD shall review the plans for consistency with design criteria. Once approved by the EMWD engineer, the applicant shall pay the required connection fee to EMWD prior to construction of the sewer line. Measure 3.8 -3b: Prior to construction, the project applicant and /or each subsequent project applicant will pay its fair share in mitigation fees to EMWD to upgrade the First Street and the Pujol Street sewer lines. (b) Facts in Support of Findings There are various existing sewer lines within the Specific Plan area boundary. Two of these sewer lines, the First Street and the Pujol Street lines, are currently at capacity. The First Street sewer is a 10 -inch pipe and the Pujol Street sewer line is an 8 -inch pipe. Both of these sewer lines will require upgrades to accommodate full project build -out. To ensure that the impacts remain less than significant, Mitigation Measures 3.9 -3a and 3.8 -3b will be implemented to guarantee capacity of the sewer lines and to reduce the impacts to below the level of significance. 3. Insufficient landfill capacity impacts A -16 During construction, solid waste may include a variety of building materials that can be recycled. Construction activities would require the removal of asphalt and concrete, stucco, wood, and other building materials from redeveloped areas. New construction would also generate solid waste consisting of cardboard and other paper products, metals, plastics and other building materials. The increased Specific Plan area (annexation of approximately 2.4 acres, reduction of area by approximately 2.3 acres) and the intensity of development anticipated by implementation of the Project would result in an increased generation of solid waste. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce the potential impacts related to landfill capacity to less than significant. Measure 3.8 -6: All proposed development plans shall designate adequate and convenient space on the property to be used for collecting all recyclable materials generated on the premises. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Projects under the Specific Plan Amendment would be implemented over an approximate 20- to 30 -year timeframe. Given the extended timeframe for build -out, the contribution of solid waste from the project area would be limited. The project area is required to have recycling collection and loading facilities in compliance with the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), which requires cities to divert 50 percent of their solid waste through source reduction, recycling, and composting. While there will be 0.10 of an acre net increase in the Specific Plan area and an intensity of development anticipated by implementation of the project that potentially could increase generation of solid waste, the increase would be minimal given that the commercial building floor space would be reduced in Old Town by approximately 1,405,285 square feet (even with the increase in 749 residential units proposed). Furthermore, the City would be required to maintain the 50 percent diversion rate required by the State for all solid waste. The solid waste generated by the project would place a minimal burden on the City to maintain the required diversion rate. This increase would not require additional landfill capacity. Finally, implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.8 -6 would ensure that the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would comply with the required diversion rates, and impacts associated with solid waste would remain less than significant. F. Traffic conditions. 1. Adverse impacts to intersections in existing plus ambient growth A -17 In the "Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Proposed Specific Plan" condition, nine (9) of the fourteen (14) intersections studied will operate at acceptable levels of service. The following intersections will not operate at an acceptable LOS: -Old Town Front Street /Rancho California Road (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /North Moreno Road (LOS E for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Sixth Street (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Main Street (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Second Street (LOS E for PM Peak Hour) (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce traffic impacts related to these intersections to less than significant. Measure 3.9 -1: The project applicant shall incorporate the following features into the design of the Specific Plan area: -At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road provide a northbound through /right -turn lane combination with a right - turn overlap. -Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts in the vicinity of Old Town Front Street and First Street /Santiago Road and Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street in the vicinity of the Moreno Road south loop. -Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. (b) Facts in Support of Findings In order to maintain the unique "Main Street' character of the Old Town area, which is geared towards a pedestrian experience, LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Proposed impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures such as enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and /or roundabouts, pedestrian facilities and accepting LOS E and F from Second Street to Sixth Street. Furthermore, any increase in traffic at the build out of the Amended Old Town Specific Plan will be significantly A -18 lower than projected under the current Specific Plan and therefore impacts would be less than significant. 2. Adverse impact to intersections in General Plan plus Proposed Specific Plan conditions. In the "General Plan Build out Plus Proposed Specific Plan" condition, eight (8) of the fourteen (14) intersections studied will operate at acceptable levels of service. The following intersections will not operate at an acceptable LOS: -Old Town Front Street /Rancho California Road (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /North Moreno Road (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Sixth Street (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Main Street (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) -Old Town Front Street /Second Street (LOS E for PM Peak Hour) •1 -15 Southbound Ramps /Rancho California Road (LOS F for PM Peak Hour) (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that reduce traffic impacts related to these intersections to less than significant. Measure 3.9 -2: The project applicant shall incorporate the following features into the design of the Specific Plan area: -At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road, provide a westbound right -turn overlap. -Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street /Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries to Old Town. -Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. (b) Facts in Support of Findings In order to maintain the unique "Main Street' character of the Old Town area, which is geared towards a pedestrian experience, LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road A -19 North. Also, the General Plan policies and standards, as amended, including the Circulation Element, for the Old Town Specific Plan area are specifically guided by the standards of the Old Town Specific Plan which allow for traffic impacts at the specified intersections. Proposed impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures such as enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and /or roundabouts, pedestrian facilities and accepting LOS E and F from Second Street to Sixth Street. Furthermore, any increase in traffic at the build out of the amended Old Town Specific Plan will be significantly lower than projected under the current Specific Plan and therefore impacts would be less than significant. VI. Environmental Effects that Remain Significant and Unavoidable After Mitigation In the environmental areas of air quality, global warming /climate change, and noise, there are instances where potential environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, as discussed below. A. Air Quality 1. Short Term Construction Impacts Short term construction could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to existing or projected air quality violations during the short duration of construction. Construction - related emissions would occur intermittently for approximately 30 years. Project construction activities would include site preparation, earthmoving, and general construction. Site preparation includes activities such as general land clearing and grubbing. Earthmoving activities include cut - and -fill operations, trenching, soil compaction, and grading. General construction includes adding improvements such as roadway surfaces, structures, and facilities. The emissions generated from these construction activities include: • Dust (including PM10 and PM2.5) primarily from "fugitive" sources (i.e., emissions released through means other than through a stack or tailpipe) such as soil disturbance; • Combustion emissions of criteria air pollutants (ROG, NOx, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, PM10, and PM2.5) primarily from operation of heavy off -road construction equipment (primarily diesel- operated), portable auxiliary equipment, and construction worker automobile trips (primarily gasoline- operated); and • Evaporative emissions (ROG) from asphalt paving and architectural coatings. A -20 Construction - related fugitive dust emissions would vary from day to day, depending on the level and type of activity, silt content of the soil, and the weather. In the absence of mitigation, construction activities may result in significant quantities of dust, and as a result, local visibility and PM10 concentrations may be adversely affected on a temporary and intermittent basis during construction. In addition, the fugitive dust generated by construction would include not only PM10, but also larger particles, which would fall out of the atmosphere within several hundred feet of the site and could result in nuisance -type impacts. (a) Findings Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Program EIR. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effect as identified in the Program EIR. Although the following Mitigation Measures will be implemented to lessen the short term air quality impacts, none were identified that could reduce the impacts to below the level of significance and therefore impacts still will remain potentially significant. Measure 3.2 -2a: The applicant shall ensure that a fugitive dust control program is implemented pursuant to the provisions of SCAQMD Rule 403. Measure 3.2 -2b: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. B. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation: 1. Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. 2. Spread soil binders. 3. Implement street sweeping as necessary. C. During construction: 1. Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. completed for the day. 2. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is A -21 3. Use low sulfur fuel (0.05 percent by weight) for construction equipment. D. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. Measure 3.2 -2c: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: A. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. B. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. C. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be, unused for four or more consecutive days). D. Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites. construction sites. E. Install vehicle wheel- washers before the roadway entrance at F. Wash off trucks leaving the site. G. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. H. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from stormwater, especially on super pads. I. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. J. Control off -road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. K. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. Measure 3.2 -2d: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the project site and the maintenance of the paving. A -22 Measure 3.2 -2e: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. Measure 3.2 -2f: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction - related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Public Works Department shall include, as appropriate: interference. A. Provision of rideshare incentives. B. Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. C. Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic D. Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. E. Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. Measure 3.2 -2g: Prior to the building /construction operations, applicant and individual contractors shall commit in writing to the following: A. Scheduling receipt of construction materials outside of the peak travel periods (i.e., 7:30 — 8:30 AM and 4:00 — 6:00 PM); sensitivity; and B. Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact C. Limiting lane closures and detours to off -peak travel periods. (b) Facts in Support of Findings It is mandatory for all construction projects in the Basin to comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 for fugitive dust ( SCAQMD, 2005b). Specific Rule 403 control requirements include, but are not limited to, applying water in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes, applying soil binders to uncovered areas, reestablishing ground cover as quickly as possible, utilizing a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the proposed project site, and maintaining effective cover over exposed areas. NOx, ROG, PM10, PM2.5, CO, and CO2 construction emissions were estimated with each phase of construction occurring concurrently for 30 years. Urbemis 2007 default amounts were used for crews, truck trips, and equipment numbers; see EIR Appendix D for more details. Emissions are based on criteria pollutant emission factors from URBEMIS 2007. The results of this analysis are summarized in EIR Table 3.2 -5 through Table 3.2 -7. As shown in EIR Table 3.2 -5, A -23 construction emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 with construction under the Specific Plan Amendment would exceed SCAQMD thresholds of significance and would therefore be significant. The approved existing Specific Plan is shown in EIR Table 3.2 -6 to produce NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 over the SCAQMD thresholds as well. Table 3.2- 7 shows the difference in emissions levels from the proposed Specific Plan Amendment minus the existing Specific Plan. As shown in EIR Table 3.2 -7, emissions of ROG, PM10, and PM2.5 are lower in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment versus the existing Specific Plan. However, impacts under the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would remain significant and unavoidable. 2. Long Term Operational Impacts Project operations could violate air quality standards or contribute substantially to existing or projected air quality violations during the long term. Operational emissions for the proposed project would be generated primarily from on- road vehicular traffic, area sources (such as landscaping equipment), and indirectly by the energy consumption of the buildings proposed under the Specific Plan Amendment. Because power is provided to the City of Temecula over an integrated electricity grid, indirect emissions from the use of electricity could occur at any of the fossil - fueled power plants in California or neighboring states, or from hydroelectric or nuclear plants or renewable energy sources. For all power plants, it can be assumed that the emissions are reviewed as part of the permitting process before the power plant is built or expanded. Operational emissions for mobile and area sources are based on criteria pollutant emission factors from URBEMIS 2007. The results of this analysis are summarized in EIR Table 3.2 -8 through EIR Table 3.2 -10. As shown in EIR Table 3.2- 8, build -out of the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would exceed all SCAQMD thresholds of significance and would, therefore, be significant. (a) Findings Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Program EIR. Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potential significant environmental effects as identified in the Program EIR. The following Mitigation Measures listed below will be implemented to lessen the long term operational air quality impacts, none were identified that could reduce the impacts to below the level of significance, and therefore impacts will remain potentially significant. Measure 3.2 -3a: Construct on -site or off -site bus turnouts, passenger benches, and shelters. A -24 Measure 3.2 -3b: Provide shuttles to major rail transit centers of multi -modal stations. Measure 3.2 -3c: Contribute to regional transit systems (e.g., right -of -way, capital improvements, etc.). Measure 3.2 -3d: Synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by development. Measure 3.2 -3e: Set up resident worker training programs to improve job /housing balance. (b) Facts in Support of Findings As shown in EIR Table 3.2 -9 (also provided below), the operational emissions with build -out of the existing Specific Plan would also exceed all SCAQMD thresholds. When the proposed project is compared to the build -out of the existing Specific Plan, as shown in EIR Table 3.2 -10 (also provided below), a major reduction of all emissions occurs. However, operational emissions would remain significant and unavoidable. TABLE 3.2 -8 PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD -OUT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (pounds per day)a Project Data ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Area Sources 145 46 34 <1 <1 57,363 Mobile Sources 763 1,106 9,825 1,802 351 1,072,376 Total 908 1,152 9,869 1,802 351 1,129,739 SCAQMD Thresholds of Significance 55 55 550 150 55 NA Significant (Yes or No)? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NA Difference between Existing and Proposed 319 535 4642 860 167 517,784 Significant (Yes or No)? No No No No No No a Project emissions estimates were made using U RBEMIS2007, version 9.2. See Appendix AQ for more details. NOTE: Values in bold are in excess of the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. NA =Not Available SOURCE: ESA, 2010. TABLE 3.2 -9 EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD -OUT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (pounds per day)a Project Data ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 CO2 Area Sources 114 53 42 <1 <1 64,290 Mobile Sources 1,113 1,634 14,489 2,662 518 1,583,234 Total 1,227 1,687 14,511 2,662 518 1,647,523 SCAQMD Thresholds of Significance 55 55 550 150 55 NA Significant (Yes or No)? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes NA a Project emissions estimates were made using U RBEMIS2007, version 9.2. See Appendix AQ for more details NOTE: Values in bold are in excess of the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. NA =Not Available A -25 SOURCE: ESA, 2010. PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD -OUT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS MINUS EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN BUILD -OUT OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS (pounds per day)a Project Data ROG NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 COz Difference between Total Existing SP Build -out -319 -535 -4642 -860 -167 - 517,784 Emissions and Proposed SP Build -out Emissions SCAQMD Thresholds of Significance 55 55 550 150 55 NA Significant (Yes or No)? No No No No No No a Project emissions estimates were made using U RBEMIS2007, version 9.2. See Appendix AQ for more details. NOTE: Values in bold are in excess of the applicable SCAQMD significance threshold. NA =Not Available SOURCE: ESA, 2010. 3. Cumulative Impacts to Air Quality Air pollutant emissions associated with the project would result in an adverse cumulative impact to air quality. A cumulative impact arises when two or more individual effects considered together are considerable, or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant impacts, meaning that the project's incremental effects must be viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. Construction Construction activity associated with other projects in the general area would typically involve the use of similar equipment and may overlap with the construction schedule of the project. Though the project creates a significant and unavoidable impact, it is assumed that other project construction activity would comply with the SCAQMD required mitigation measures, which would reduce air quality impacts but not eliminate air pollutant emissions completely. This would be a significant cumulative impact. (a) Findings Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Program EIR. Although mitigation measures were evaluated for their ability to eliminate the potential significant adverse impacts upon cumulative air quality impacts, none were identified that could reduce the impacts to below the level of significance. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Mitigation Measures related to future construction and operations within the Old Town Specific Area will be implemented to reduce air quality impacts. A -26 However, the mitigation measures were evaluated and determined not to eliminate the cumulative potential significant adverse impacts upon air quality. No feasible measures were identified that could reduce the impacts from associated with the project that would result in an adverse cumulative impact to air quality. B. Global Warming /Climate Change 1. Conflicts with implementation of state goals for reducing GHG emissions and thereby negatively impacts global climate change. The project could conflict with implementation of State goals for reducing GHG emissions and could thereby have a negative effect on global climate change. The proposed project would contribute to global climate change as a result of emissions of GHGs, primarily CO2, emitted by construction and operational activities. GHG impacts are considered to be exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non- cumulative greenhouse gas emission impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA, 2008). Thus, the Specific Plan Amendment analysis of GHG emissions is to determine whether the proposed project impact is cumulatively considerable. (a) Findings Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Program EIR. Specifically, although mitigation measures were evaluated for their ability to eliminate the potential significant adverse impacts upon Global Warming, none were identified that could reduce the impacts to below the level of significance. Measure 3.3 -1: The City shall require implementation of all feasible energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures, including but not limited to the following: Energy Efficiency Design buildings to be energy efficient. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an integral part of lighting systems in buildings. Use trees, landscaping and sun screens on west and south exterior building walls to reduce energy use. Install light colored "cool' roofs, cool pavements. Provide information on energy management services for large energy users. Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and control systems. Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other outdoor lighting. Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting. Provide education on energy efficiency. A -27 Renewable Energy Install solar and wind power systems, solar and tankless hot water heaters, and energy- efficient heating ventilation and air conditioning. Educate consumers about existing incentives. Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas. Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications. Water Conservation and Efficiency Create water - efficient landscapes. Install water - efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture -based irrigation controls. • Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new developments and on public property. Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design buildings to be water - efficient. Install water - efficient fixtures and appliances. • Use graywater. (Graywater is untreated household waste water from bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, and water from clothes washing machines.) For example, install dual plumbing in all new development allowing graywater to be used for landscape irrigation. Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non - vegetated surfaces) and control runoff. Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles. Implement low- impact development practices that maintain the existing hydrologic character of the site to manage storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining storm water runoff on -site can drastically reduce the need for energy - intensive imported water at the site.) • Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and location. The strategy may include many of the specific items listed above, plus other innovative measures that are appropriate to the specific project. • Provide education about water conservation and available programs and incentives. Solid Waste Measures • Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). • Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. • Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services. A -28 Land Use Measures • Include mixed -use, infill, and higher density in development projects to support the reduction of vehicle trips, promote alternatives to individual vehicle travel, and promote efficient delivery of services and goods. • Educate the public about the benefits of well- designed, higher density development. Incorporate public transit into project design. Preserve and create open space and parks. Preserve existing trees, and plant replacement trees at a set ratio. • Develop "brownfields" and other underused or defunct properties near existing public transportation and jobs. • Include pedestrian and bicycle -only streets and plazas within developments. Create travel routes that ensure that destinations may be reached conveniently by public transportation, bicycling or walking. Transportation and Motor Vehicles Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and construction vehicles. Use low or zero - emission vehicles, including construction vehicles. (*The following goals, policies and /or suggestions are guiding principles that shall be required of the site specific applicant as applicable.) "Transportation and Motor Vehicles • Promote ride sharing programs (e.g., by designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a web site or message board for coordinating rides). • Create car sharing programs. Accommodations for such programs include providing parking spaces for the car share vehicles at convenient locations accessible by public transportation. • Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use of low or zero - emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities and conveniently located alternative fueling stations). Institute a low- carbon fuel vehicle incentive program. Provide public transit incentives such as free or low -cost monthly transit passes. Promote "least polluting" ways to connect people and goods to their destinations. Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new subdivisions, and large developments. Incorporate bicycle - friendly intersections into street design. A -29 • For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large employers, provide facilities that encourage bicycle commuting, including, e.g., locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor bicycle parking. • Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location of schools, parks and other destination points. Work with the school district to restore or expand school bus services. Institute a telecommute and /or flexible work hours program. Provide information, training, and incentives to encourage participation. Provide incentives for equipment purchases to allow high - quality teleconferences. Provide information on all options for individuals and businesses to reduce transportation- related emissions. Provide education and information about public transportation. "Off -site Mitigation: Fund off -site mitigation projects (e.g., alternative energy projects, or energy or water audits for existing projects) that will reduce carbon emissions, conduct an audit of its other existing operations and agree to retrofit, or purchase carbon "credits" from another entity that will undertake mitigation. (b) Facts in Support of Findings The Specific Plan Amendment analysis of GHG emissions is to determine whether the proposed project impact is cumulatively considerable. Four types of analyses are used to determine whether the project could be cumulatively considerable and potentially conflict with the State goals for reducing GHG emissions. The analyses are as follows: A. Any potential conflicts with the CARB's thirty -nine (39) recommended actions in California's AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. B. The relative size of the project. The project's GHG emissions will be compared to the size of major facilities that are required to report GHG emissions (25,000 metric tons /year of CO2e) to the State. The project size will also be compared to the SCAQMD GHG threshold, as well as the California GHG emissions limit of 427 million metric tons per year of CO2e emissions by 2020. In reaching its goals the CARIB will focus upon the largest emitters of GHG emissions. C. The basic energy efficiency parameters of a project to determine whether its design is inherently energy efficient. D. Any potential conflicts with applicable City of Temecula plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. With regard to Item A, the proposed project does not pose any apparent conflict with the most recent list of the CARIB early action strategies. A -30 With regard to Item B, proposed project construction GHG emissions would be approximately 9,955 metric tons of CO2e /yr. The existing Specific Plan construction greenhouse gas emissions would be approximately 10,317 metric tons of CO2E /yr. Therefore the proposed Specific Plan Amendment would have a 4 percent reduction of construction emissions compared to the existing Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment build -out operational GHG emissions from vehicle trips and space heating would be approximately 181,717 metric tons of CO2e /yr, and indirect operation emissions from electricity generation would be approximately 10,939 metric tons of CO2e /yr, totaling 192,657 metric tons of CO2e /yr. The proposed project would be classified as a major source of greenhouse gas emissions (total emissions would exceed the lower reporting limit, which is 25,000 metric tons of CO2e /yr). Existing Specific Plan build -out operational emissions from vehicle trips and space heating account for 264,680 metric tons of CO2e /yr, and indirect operational emissions of approximately14,472 metric tons of CO2e /yr totaling approximately 279,152 metric tons of CO2e /yr. Therefore, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment emissions would have a 32 percent reduction compared to the existing Specific Plan build -out emissions. When compared to the overall State emissions limit of approximately 427 million metric tons CO2e /yr, the proposed Specific Plan Amendment build -out (192,657 metric tons CO2e /yr) would be 0.06 percent of the state goal. However, since the project would result in GHG emissions that would exceed the major source threshold (25,000 metric tons CO2e /yr) and the SCAQMD GHG screening threshold (3,000 metric tons CO2e /yr), the project would potentially conflict with the State's ability to meet the AB 32 goals. With regard to Item C, the project would introduce high- density residential uses, thus creating a mixed -use environment in which residents would benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities, which would reduce the community's reliance on automobiles. With regard to Item D, the City of Temecula does not have any plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs, therefore the project would not pose a conflict. The review of Items A, B, C, and D indicate that the project would potentially conflict with the State goals in AB 32 and, therefore, this impact would be significant without mitigation. The State of California Attorney General's office has compiled a list of GHG reduction measures that could be applied to a diverse range of projects (State of California Department of Justice, 2008), many of which are included in Mitigation Measure 3.3 -1 above. Even with implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.3 -1, the Specific Plan Amendment project would be considered a major source of greenhouse gases and would exceed the SCAQMD GHG screening threshold. Consequently, the increase in GHG by the project places the project in conflict with the goal of the state to reduce up to 169 million metric tons CO2e /year. This impact would remain significant and unavoidable. A -31 C. Noise Project Construction Project construction has the potential to expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of the applicable City of Temecula Noise Standards. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant construction noise impacts. Specifically, Mitigation Measure 3.7 -1a through 3.7 -1d will be imposed to alleviate this impact. No other feasible mitigation measures exist to further reduce this potentially significant impact. Measure 3.7 -1a: The applicant shall ensure, as specified in City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94 -25, that no construction may occur within one - quarter (1 /4) of a mile of any occupied residence during the following hours: A. 6:30 PM to 6:30 AM, Monday through Friday. B. Before 7:00 AM or after 6:30 PM on Saturdays. C. At any time on Sunday or any nationally recognized holiday. Measure 3.7 -1b: The applicant shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Measure 3.7 -1c: The applicant shall ensure that all construction staging shall be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings. Measure 3.7 -1d: The applicant shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. 9) Reports of the results of the blast monitoring shall be provided to the City, the local fire department, and owners of any buried utilities on or adjacent to the site within 24 hours following blasting. Reports documenting damage, excessive vibrations, etc. shall be provided to the City and impacted property owners. (b) Facts in Support of Findings Construction activity noise levels at and near the construction areas will fluctuate depending on the particular type, number, and duration of uses of various pieces of construction equipment. Construction - related material haul trips will raise ambient noise levels along haul routes, depending on the number of haul trips made and types of vehicles used. In addition, certain types of construction equipment generate impulsive noises (such as pile driving), which can be particularly annoying. Pile driving, however, is not proposed for project development. A -32 The City of Temecula noise ordinance states that when the site is within one - quarter mile from an occupied residence, no person shall conduct construction activity between the hours of 6:30 PM and 6:30 AM Monday through Friday, and shall only conduct construction between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:30 PM on Saturday. Further, no construction activity shall be undertaken on Sundays and nationally recognized holidays. Daytime construction is commonly exempt from noise ordinances because background noise is typically louder during the day than at night, and sleep disturbance is typically considered to be a nighttime impact. However, even daytime noise levels from construction can exceed daytime ambient levels and be a substantial annoyance to nearby residential units. It should be noted that exceptions may be requested from the standards set forth in the City's Noise Ordinance. An application for a construction - related exception can be submitted in writing at least three working days (seventy -two hours) in advance of the scheduled and permitted activity (accompanied by the appropriate inspection fees), subject to approval by the City manager or designated representative. Although the above mitigation measures would reduce the noise impact from construction, construction sites are noisy locations with heavy equipment that could substantially affect noise levels at nearby residences. Such impacts could last a substantial time before the noise complaint system would be used to reduce the impact. Therefore, construction noise could at times be a short - term significant and unavoidable impact of the proposed project. 2. Traffic Noise Traffic associated with operation of the project would result in a significant increase in ambient noise levels on nearby roadways. Most of the noise generated by the implementation of the project would result from increased traffic. The proposed amendment to the OTSP would contribute to an increase in local traffic volumes, resulting in higher noise levels along local roadways as compared to existing conditions. (a) Findings Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant traffic noise impact. Specifically, Mitigation Measure 3.7 -4 will be imposed to alleviate this impact. No other feasible mitigation measures exist to further reduce this potentially significant impact. Measure 3.7 -4: If necessary to comply with the interior noise requirements of the City of Temecula and achieve an acceptable interior noise level, noise reduction in the form of sound -rated assemblies (i.e., windows, exterior doors, and walls) shall be incorporated into project building design, based upon recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer. Final recommendations for sound -rated assemblies will depend on the specific building designs and layout of buildings on the site and shall be determined during the design phase. (b) Facts in Support of Findings A -33 With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.7 -4, the interior noise impact from project traffic would be reduced. However, exterior noise levels along roadways 2, 5, 6, and 7 would be substantially greater with the project than existing and would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. To assess the impact of project traffic on roadside noise levels, noise level projections were created using the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) TNM Lookup model and the project traffic study provided by RK Engineering Group, Inc., for those road segments that pass by sensitive receptors. Traffic noise levels were analyzed for 10 roadway segments. The segments analyzed and results of the modeling are shown in EIR Table 3.7 -7 (also provided below for reference). TABLE 3.7 -7 EXISTING AND FUTURE PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS Modeled Roadway Segment Existing (A) Existing + Project (B) Incremental Increase (B — A) Peak Hour Noise Levels (Leq)a Cumulative 2035 + Project Significant (Yes /No)° (C) Incremental Increase (C — A) Cumulatively Considerable? 1. Old Town 70 71 1 No 71 2 Yes Front St north of Rancho California Rd 2. Old Town 68 70 2 Yes 70 2 Yes Front St south of Rancho California Rd 3. Rancho 73 74 1 No 74 1 No California Rd east of Old Town Front St 4. Old Town 66 67 1 No 67 2 Yes Front St south of Main St 5. Main St east of 50 58 8 Yes 58 8 Yes Old Town Front St 6. Main St West 52 59 7 Yes 59 7 Yes of Old Town Front St 7. Old Town 66 68 3 Yes 69 4 Yes Front St north of Santiago 8. Mercedes St. 56 60 4 No 61 5 Yes A -34 Peak Hour Noise Levels (Leq)a Existing+ Incremental Cumulative Incremental Existing Project Increase 2035 + Project Increase Modeled Roadway Significant Cumulatively Segment (A) (B) (B — A) (Yes /No)° (C) (C — A) Considerable? South of Moreno Rd. Mercedes 9. 3rd St west of 52 52 0 No 52 1 No 10. Moreno road 52 55 4 No 56 4 No east of Mercedes St Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on PM Peak Hour. Ldn is approximately equal to the peak -hour Leq under normal traffic conditions (Caltrans, 1998). b Considered significant if the incremental increase in noise (Ldn) is greater than 5 dBA in a noise environment of 60 dBA or less, an increase of 3 dBA in a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and less than 65 dBA, or an increase of 1.5 dBA in a noise environment greater than 65 dBA, as described in Table 3.7 -3. SOURCE: RK Engineering Group Inc. 2009, ESA 2009. As depicted in E I R Table 3.7 -7, four of the 10 roadway segments would experience a significant increase in traffic noise (compared to existing conditions) resulting from the proposed amendment to the OTSP. Notably, the traffic study found that the existing Specific Plan at build -out is projected to generate approximately 11,165 net vehicles during the PM peak hour. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment at build -out is projected to generate approximately 7,357 net vehicles during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed amendment to the OTSP at build -out would generate considerably fewer trips and less noise from traffic operations than the currently approved Specific Plan at build -out. Cumulative long term traffic increasing noise levels. The project, together with anticipated future development, could result in long -term traffic increases that could cumulatively increase noise levels. A cumulative impact arises when two or more individual projects, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant impacts, meaning that the project's incremental effects must be viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. When considered alone, the proposed project would generate noise mainly by adding more traffic to the area. Other anticipated projects would contribute to noise in the area due to increased traffic volumes. (a) Findings A -35 Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into the Project that avoid or substantially lessen the potentially significant traffic noise impact. Specifically, Mitigation Measure 3.7 -4 will be imposed to alleviate this impact. No other feasible mitigation measures exist to further reduce this potentially significant impact. Measure 3.7 -4: If necessary to comply with the interior noise requirements of the City of Temecula and achieve an acceptable interior noise level, noise reduction in the form of sound -rated assemblies (i.e., windows, exterior doors, and walls) shall be incorporated into project building design, based upon recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer. Final recommendations for sound -rated assemblies will depend on the specific building designs and layout of buildings on the site and shall be determined during the design phase. (b) Facts in Support of Findings EIR Table 3.7 -8 (provided below) shows the future cumulative traffic with the project and existing traffic and the difference between the two. As depicted in Table 3.7 -8, seven out of 10 roadway segments would experience a significant increase in traffic noise from the proposed project. TABLE 3.7 -8 EXISTING AND FUTURE PEAK -HOUR NOISE LEVELS ALONG SELECTED ROADWAYS 2. Old Town Front St south of Rancho 68 70 2 Yes 70 2 Yes California Rd 3. Rancho California Rd east of Old 73 74 1 No 74 1 No Town Front St 4. Old Town Front St south of Main St 66 67 1 No 67 2 Yes 5. Main St east of 50 58 8 Yes 58 8 Yes A -36 Peak Hour Noise Levels (Leq)a Existing+ Incremental Cumulative Incremental Existing Project Increase 2035 + Project Increase Modeled Roadway Significant Cumulatively Segment (A) (B) (B — A) (Yes /No)° (C) (C — A) Considerable? 1. Old Town Front St north of Rancho 70 71 1 No 71 2 Yes California Rd 2. Old Town Front St south of Rancho 68 70 2 Yes 70 2 Yes California Rd 3. Rancho California Rd east of Old 73 74 1 No 74 1 No Town Front St 4. Old Town Front St south of Main St 66 67 1 No 67 2 Yes 5. Main St east of 50 58 8 Yes 58 8 Yes A -36 Peak Hour Noise Levels (Leq)a Existing+ Incremental Cumulative Incremental Existing Project Increase 2035 + Project Increase Modeled Roadway Significant Cumulatively Segment (A) (B) (B — A) (Yes /No)° (C) (C — A) Considerable? Old Town Front St 6. Main St West of Old Town Front St 52 59 7 Yes 59 7 Yes 7. Old Town Front St north of Santiago 66 68 3 Yes 69 4 Yes 8. Mercedes St. 5 South of Moreno Rd. 56 60 4 No 61 Yes 9. 3rd St west of Mercedes 52 52 0 No 52 1 No 10. Moreno road east of Mercedes St 52 55 4 No 56 4 No a Noise levels are estimated at a distance of 50 feet from roadway centerline. Data based on PM Peak Hour. Ldn is approximately equal to the peak -hour Leq under normal traffic conditions (Caltrans, 1998). b Considered significant if the incremental increase in noise (Ldn) is greater than 5 dBA in a noise environment of 60 dBA or less, an increase of 3 dBA in a noise environment greater than 60 dBA and less than 65 dBA, or an increase of 1.5 dBA in a noise environment greater than 65 dBA, as described in Table 3.7 -3. SOURCE: RK Engineering Group Inc. 2009, ESA 2009. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 3.7 -4, the cumulative interior noise impacts of the project would be reduced. However, the project would result in cumulatively considerable exterior noise levels along roadways 1, 2, and 4 through 8, which would remain a significant and unavoidable impact. VII. Project Alternatives A. Alternatives Considered But Rejected in the Program EIR The City considered a reasonable range of alternatives as discussed below. In determining what alternatives to analyze, the City considered, but rejected, an alternative that would result in an overall increase of commercial building floor space in Old Town and a reduction in residential units. An increase in commercial building floor space within the project area would result in a reduction of shared and private open spaces (open areas for parking, courtyards, and balconies), and likely would result in an increase in vehicle trips per day and a resulting increase in associated air quality and noise impacts. Accordingly, this alternative was rejected. A -37 The Program EIR analyzed three other project alternatives. These three alternatives were considered but ultimately found not to meet the project's objectives as for the various reasons stated below. B. Alternatives Considered in the Program EIR 1. Alternative One — No Project /Reasonably Foreseeable Development (Continuation of Existing Specific Plan) Alternative (a) Summary of Alternative Under this alternative, the current project would not be pursued and no associated components identified under the proposed project would be built. This alternative evaluates the environmental effects of build -out of the Specific Plan area according to the existing OTSP. (b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative The No Project /Reasonably Foreseeable Development Alternative would result in greater air quality, noise, and traffic impacts than the current project due to the number of vehicle trips associated with the substantial commercial development allowed under the No Project /Reasonably Foreseeable Development Alternative. In addition, this Alternative would not emphasize the mixed use development promoted by the proposed Project, and therefore would not reduce dependence on vehicles. Consequently, this Alternative would result in greater climate change /global warming impacts than the proposed project. Finally, this Alternative would not meet the project's primary objective of updating the existing Old Town Specific Plan. For all of these reasons, the City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible. Alternative 2. Alternative Two — Increased Residential /Decreased Commercial (a) Summary of Alternative With the proposed Specific Plan Amendment, the mixed -use aspect of the project results in an overall reduction in commercial building floor space in Old Town of approximately 1,405,285 square feet compared to the existing Specific Plan, and the addition of approximately 749 residential units over the existing Specific Plan. The reduction in building floor space is attributable to the fact that residential uses require more open areas for parking, courtyards, balconies, and other shared and private open spaces than commercial uses do. Alternative 2 would increase the amount of residential units by 1,100 residential units in comparison to the existing OTSP and reduce the building floor space for commercial use by 2,000,000 square feet in comparison to the existing OTSP. This Alternative would essentially increase residential development and decrease commercial development even further than the proposed project. A -38 (b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative As a result of the reduced amount of commercial building space under Alternative 2, there would be fewer trips generated per day and thus a reduction in noise and air quality impacts within the OTSP area. Alternative 2 would achieve some of the proposed project objectives by updating the current OTSP to provide enhanced desired services within the plan area to both City residents and visitors while being compatible with the nearby residential area; respecting the history of the OTSP area while fitting with current economics; accommodating greater density and encouraging a variety of architectural styles; and implementing significant new investment in the Old Town area to help promote rapid growth in Temecula Valley and develop a renewed interest in town centers and mixed -use development. However, Alternative 2 would be less focused on promoting economic activity within the City because residential development would be emphasized over commercial development. Therefore, Alternative 2 would not fully achieve all of the project objectives. For this reason, the City Council rejects this alternative as infeasible. Alternative 3. Alternative Three — Reduced Residential /Increased Commercial (a) Summary of Alternative Alternative 3 would reduce the commercial square footage by 1,000,000 square feet compared to the existing Specific Plan and would reduce the number of residential units by 659 units compared to the existing Specific Plan. Therefore, Alternative 3 would result in an increase in 405,285 square feet of commercial space in comparison to the proposed project and 1,408 fewer residential units in comparison to the proposed project. (b) Reasons for Rejecting Alternative Due to the increased commercial development (as compared to the proposed Project) and the increased vehicle trips associated therewith, Alternative 3 would result in increased adverse air quality, noise, and traffic impacts. In addition, this Alternative would not emphasize a mixed -use environment in which residents would benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities nearly as much as the proposed project, and therefore this Alternative would result in greater climate change /global warming impacts than the proposed project. This Alternative would achieve some of the proposed project objectives by updating the current OTSP to provide enhanced desired services within the plan area to both City residents and visitors while being compatible with the nearby residential area and respecting the history of the OTSP area. Alternative 3 would also encourage a variety of architectural styles and implement significant new investment in the Old Town area to help promote rapid growth in Temecula Valley and develop a renewed interest in town centers and mixed -use development. Alternative 3 also would be more focused on promoting economic activity within the City because A -39 commercial development would be emphasized over residential development. Alternative 3 would not, however, encourage development of an increased number of high - quality residential neighborhoods compared to either the existing OTSP or the proposed project. Therefore, Alternative 3 would not fully achieve all of the project objectives and would have greater adverse impacts. Because adverse impacts will increase under this Alternative and this Alternative will fail to meet all of the Project objectives, the City Council rejects this Alternative as infeasible. C. Environmentally Superior Alternative The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15126.6(e)(2), requires the identification of the environmentally superior alternative. Alternative 2 would be environmentally superior to the proposed project based on the minimization of environmental impacts; specifically, development under Alternative 2 would result in a reduction of traffic, air and noise impacts. However, Alternative 2 would be less focused on promoting economic activity within the City because residential development would be emphasized significantly over commercial development. Therefore, Alternative 2 would not fully achieve all of the project objectives. Due to this Alternative's inability to meet all of the project objectives and, specifically, the objective focusing on stimulating economic activity, the City Council finds that Alternative 2 is not the preferred Alternative and is not superior to the proposed Project. D. The Project As Proposed 1. Summary of Project The Project is described in detail in the Program EIR. 2. Reasons for Selecting Project as Proposed The City Council has carefully reviewed the attributes and environmental impacts of all the alternatives analyzed in the Final Program EIR and has compared them with those of the proposed Project. The City Council finds that each of the alternatives is infeasible for various environmental, economic, technical, social, or other reasons set forth above. The City Council further finds that the Project as proposed is the best combination of features to serve the interest of the public and achieve the project goals. More specifically, the Project as proposed strikes a proper balance between commercial development that focuses on economic activity, and high - quality residential development that emphasizes a mixed -use environment in which residents benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. This proposed Old Town Specific Plan Amendment recognizes the need for economic activity and growth in the City but also promotes sound environmental policies due to the reduced reliance on vehicle trips (stemming from mixed use development) and proximity to public transportation. For all of these reasons, the City Council selects the Project as proposed. . ,I EXHIBIT B Statement of Overriding Considerations The following Statement of Overriding Considerations is made in connection with the proposed approval of the Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan (the "Project'). CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance the economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve a project. If the benefits of the project outweigh the unavoidable adverse effects, those effects may be considered acceptable. CEQA requires the agency to provide written findings supporting the specific reasons for considering a project acceptable when significant impacts are unavoidable. Such reasons must be based on substantial evidence in the Program EIR or elsewhere in the administrative record. The reasons for proceeding with this Project despite the adverse environmental impacts that may result are provided in this Statement of Overriding Considerations. The City Council finds that the economic, social and other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality, climate change /global warming, and noise. In making this finding, the City Council has balanced the benefits of the Project against its unavoidable impacts and has indicated its willingness to accept those adverse impacts. The City Council finds that each one of the following benefits of the Project, independent of the other benefits, would warrant approval of the Project notwithstanding the unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. A. The City Council finds that all feasible mitigation measures have been imposed to either lessen Project impacts to less than significant or to the extent feasible, and furthermore, that alternatives to the Project are infeasible because they generally have similar or greater impacts, or they do not provide the benefits of the Project, or are otherwise socially or economically infeasible as fully described in the Statement of Facts and Findings. B. The proposed Project strikes a proper balance between commercial development that focuses on economic activity, and high - quality residential development that emphasizes a mixed -use environment in which residents benefit from nearby shopping and employment opportunities. C. The proposed Project will reduce potential adverse environmental impacts compared with build -out under the currently- existing Old Town Specific Plan due to its emphasis on mixed -use development and the benefits that such development provides, including reduced vehicle trips as a result of proximity to shopping, entertainment, and employment opportunities. D. The proposed Project will create additional housing units beyond what currently exists in the Old Town Specific Plan area or what currently could be developed in that area and thus will add to the available housing stock in the City. E. The proposed Project will augment the City's economic base by providing additional tax revenues resulting from the commercial component of the proposed allowable development. The City Council finds that the foregoing benefits provided through approval of the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment Project outweigh the identified significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council further finds that each of the individual Old Town Specific Plan Amendment Project benefits discussed above outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects identified in the Final Program EIR and therefore finds those impacts to be acceptable. The City Council further finds that each of the benefits listed above, standing alone, is sufficient justification for the City Council to override these unavoidable environmental impacts. :M EXHIBIT C Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program C -1 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Aesthetics Measure 3.1 -3a: The applicant shall ensure that all lighting fixtures Pre - Construction shall contain "sharp cut -off' fixtures, and shall be fitted with flat glass / Construction lenses and internal and external shielding. Measure 3.1 -3b: The applicant shall ensure that all fixtures shall be parallel with the finished grade of the project site; no fixtures shall be tilted above a 90- degree angle. Measure 3.1 -3c: The applicant shall ensure that site lighting systems shall be grouped into control zones to allow for open, closing, and night light /security lighting schemes. All control groups shall be controlled by an automatic lighting system utilizing a time clock, photocell, and low voltage relays. Measure 3.1 -3d: The applicant shall ensure that design and layout of the site shall take advantage of landscaping, on -site architectural massing, and off —site architectural massing to block light sources and reflection from cars. Measure 3.1 -3e: The applicant shall submit a lighting plan and photometric plan to be reviewed by the City of Temecula. The lighting plan shall include design features (such as those mentioned above) to minimize impacts of light and glare on the surrounding area. Measure 3.1 -3f: The City shall complete a post - installation inspection to ensure that the site is not excessively illuminated (such that lighting is not creating excessive glare, unreasonably competing for the public's attention or creating any roadway safety hazard) and that lighting sources are properly shielded. Measure 3.1 -3g: In order to mitigate potential impacts to the Mount Palomar Observatory, all lighting plans shall be reviewed by the City to assure utilization of low pressure sodium vapor lamps; step -down lighting techniques; shielding to prevent upward and outward illumination; and compliance with the County Ordinance No. 655. Measure 3.1 -3h: The proposed Specific Plan amendment shall prohibit the use of highly reflective construction materials on exterior wall surfaces. The exterior of permitted buildings shall be constructed of materials such as high performance tinted non - mirrored glass, painted metal panels and pre -cast concrete or fabricated wall surfaces. City of Temecula City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee Issuance of Building Permit, review of plans, field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 1 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Air Quality Measure 3.2 -2a: The applicant shall ensure that a fugitive dust control program is implemented pursuant to the provision of SCAQMD Rule 403. Measure 3.2 -2b: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following: During clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation, maintain equipment engines in proper tune. After clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation: Wet the area down, sufficient enough to form a crust on the surface with repeated soakings, as necessary, to maintain the crust and prevent dust pick up by the wind. Spread soil binders. Implement street sweeping as necessary. During construction: Use water trucks or sprinkler systems to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when leaving the site. Wet down areas in the late morning and after work is completed for the day. Use low sulfur fuel (0.05 percent by weight) for construction equipment. Discontinue construction during second stage smog alerts. Measure 3.2 -2c: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for compliance with the following. Require a phased schedule for construction activities to minimize daily emissions. Schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Treat unattended construction areas with water (disturbed lands which have been, or are expected to be, unused for four or more consecutive days). Require the planting of vegetative ground cover as soon as possible on construction sites. Pre - Construction SCAQMD / Construction City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee Issuance of Grading Permit and field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 2 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Install vehicle wheel- washers before the roadway entrance at construction sites. Wash off trucks leaving the site. Require all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose substances and building materials to be covered, or to maintain a minimum freeboard of two feet between the top of the load and the top of the truck bed sides. Use vegetative stabilization, whenever possible, to control soil erosion from stormwater, especially on super pads. Require enclosures or chemical stabilization of open storage piles of sand, dirt, or other aggregate materials. Control off -road vehicle travel by posting driving speed limits on these roads, consistent with City standards. Use electricity from power poles rather than temporary diesel or gasoline power generators. Measure 3.2 -2d: Prior to grading and construction, the applicant shall be responsible for the paving of all access aprons to the project site and the maintenance of the paving. Measure 3.2 -2e: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for assuring that construction vehicles are equipped with proper emission control equipment to substantially reduce emissions. Measure 3.2 -2f: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall be responsible for the incorporation of measures to reduce construction related traffic congestion into the project grading permit. Measures, subject to the approval and verification by the Public Works Department, shall include, as appropriate: Provision of rideshare incentives. Provision of transit incentives for construction personnel. Configuration of construction parking to minimize traffic interference. Measures to minimize obstruction of through traffic lanes. Use of a flagman to guide traffic when deemed necessary. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 3 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Measure 3.2 -2g: Prior to the building /construction operations, applicant and individual contractors shall commit in writing to the following: Scheduling receipt of construction materials to peak travel periods (i.e., 7:30 — 8:30 AM and 4:00 — 6:00 PM); Routing construction traffic through areas of least impact sensitivity; and Limiting lane closures and detours to off -peak travel periods. Measure 3.2 -3a: Construct on -site or off -site bus turnouts, Pre - Construction SCAQMD City of Issuance of passenger benches, and shelters. / Construction Temecula Grading Permit Measure 3.2 -3b: Provide shuttles to major rail transit centers of Building Official and field multi -modal stations. or other verification and Designee sign -off by City Measure 3.2 -3c: Contribute to regional transit systems (e.g., right- of Temecula of -way, capital improvements, etc.). Measure 3.2 -3d: Synchronize traffic lights on streets impacted by development. Measure 3.2 -3e: Set up resident worker training programs to improve job/housing balance. Global Warming /Climate Change Measure 3.3 -1: The applicant shall require implementation of all Pre- Construction SCAQMD City of Issuance of feasible energy efficiency and GHG reduction measures, including / Construction Temecula Grading Permit but not limited to the following: Building Official and field Energy Efficiency or other verification and Design buildings to be energy efficient. Designee sign -off by City of Temecula Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an integral part of lighting systems in buildings. Use trees, landscaping and sun screens on west and south exterior building walls to reduce energy use. Install light colored "cool" roofs, cool pavements. Provide information on energy management services for large energy users. Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and control systems. Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other outdoor lighting. Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 4 ESA / D209294 MMRP April 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Provide education on energy efficiency. Renewable Energy Install solar and wind power systems, solar and tankless hot water heaters, and energy - efficient heating ventilation and air conditioning. Educate consumers about existing incentives. Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas. Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications. Water Conservation and Efficiency Create water - efficient landscapes. Install water - efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as soil moisture -based irrigation controls. Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new developments and on public property. Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. Design buildings to be water - efficient. Install water - efficient fixtures and appliances. Use graywater. (Graywater is untreated household waste water from bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, and water from clothes washing machines.) For example, install dual plumbing in all new development allowing graywater to be used for landscape irrigation. Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply water to non - vegetated surfaces) and control runoff. Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and vehicles. Implement low- impact development practices that maintain the existing hydrologic character of the site to manage storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining storm water runoff on -site can drastically reduce the need for energy - intensive imported water at the site.) Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and location. The strategy may include many of the specific items listed above, plus other innovative measures that are appropriate to the specific project. Provide education about water conservation and available programs and incentives. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment rJ ESA / D209294 MMRP April 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Solid Waste Measures Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard). Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste and adequate recycling containers located in public areas. Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and available recycling services. Land Use Measures Include mixed -use, infll, and higher density in development projects to support the reduction of vehicle trips, promote alternatives to individual vehicle travel, and promote efficient delivery of services and goods. Educate the public about the benefits of well- designed, higher density development. Incorporate public transit into project design. Preserve and create open space and parks. Preserve existing trees, and plant replacement trees at a set ratio. Develop "brownfelds" and other underused or defunct properties near existing public transportation and jobs. Include pedestrian and bicycle -only streets and plazas within developments. Create travel routes that ensure that destinations may be reached conveniently by public transportation, bicycling or walking. Transportation and Motor Vehicles Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and construction vehicles. Use low or zero - emission vehicles, including construction vehicles. ("The following goals, policies and /or suggestions are guiding principles that shall be required of the applicant as applicable.) *Transportation and Motor Vehicles Promote ride sharing programs (e.g., by designating a certain percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles, designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a web Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 6 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks site or message board for coordinating rides). Create car sharing programs. Accommodations for such programs include providing parking spaces for the car share vehicles at convenient locations accessible by public transportation. Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage the use of low or zero-emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle charging facilities and conveniently located alternative fueling stations). Institute a low- carbon fuel vehicle incentive program. Provide public transit incentives such as free or low -cost monthly transit passes. Promote "least polluting' ways to connect people and goods to their destinations. Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new subdivisions, and large developments. Incorporate bicycle - friendly intersections into street design. For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and convenience. For large employers, provide facilities that encourage bicycle commuting, including, e.g., locked bicycle storage or covered or indoor bicycle parking. Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location of schools, parks and other destination points. Work with the school district to restore or expand school bus services. Institute a telecommute and /or flexible work hours program. Provide information, training, and incentives to encourage participation. Provide incentives for equipment purchases to allow high - quality teleconferences. Provide information on all options for individuals and businesses to reduce transportation - related emissions. Provide education and information about public transportation. *Off -site Mitigation Fund off -site mitigation projects (e.g., alternative energy projects, or energy or water audits for existing projects) that will reduce carbon emissions, conduct an audit of its other existing operations and agree to retrofit, or purchase carbon "credits" from another entity Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 7 ESA / D209294 MMRP April 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Cultural Resources Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Pre- Construction Riverside Riverside City of General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS- County County Temecula 39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which qualified qualified Project requires that all areas slated for development or other ground- archaeologist archaeologist Approval disturbing activities shall be subject to a Phase I survey (including a and Pechanga and Pechanga 1 -mile radius records search and intensive archaeological survey) tribal tribal for archaeological resources on a project - specific basis prior to the representative( representative( City's approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a s) s) qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians (Pechanga Tribe).1 The Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to accompany the project archaeologist on the Phase I walkover survey, and shall be given the opportunity to comment on the archaeological report which results from the evaluation. If archaeological resources are encountered during the survey, the City shall require that the resources are evaluated for their eligibility for listing on the National Register or California Register by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga Tribe, and that recommendations are made for treatment of these resources, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. If Phase II archeological evaluations are recommended, the Pechanga Tribe shall consult on all proposed test plans and participate with the project archeologist during testing and evaluation. All such surveys with recommendations shall be completed prior to project approval. Any identified resources shall be avoided if feasible. Ground - disturbing activity in areas which were previously undisturbed, or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, to be sensitive for cultural resources shall be monitored by a Riverside County qualified archaeologist and Pechanga tribal representative(s). Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1 b: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Construction City of City of Verification by General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS- Temecula in Temecula in City of 39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which consultation consultation Temecula in states that during construction, should prehistoric or historic with Pechanga with Pechanga consultation subsurface cultural resources be discovered, all activity in the Tribe Tribe with Pechanga vicinity of the find shall stop and a Riverside County qualified Tribe archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe will be contacted to assess the significance of the find according to CEQA 1 Pursuant to the City's General Plan Policy 6.10 and OS -39, the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians is specifically identified as the consulting Tribe and therefore the mitigation measures and conditions of approval should also specifically identify the Pechanga Tribe. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 8 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Guidelines Section 15064.5. If any find is determined to be significant, the City and the archaeologist will determine, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, appropriate avoidance measures or other appropriate mitigation. All cultural materials recovered will be, as necessary and in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, subject to scientific analysis, and documentation according to current professional standards. Sacred and ceremonial items shall not be subject to any scientific analysis. Upon completion of earthmoving activities, the landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1c: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Construction City of City of Verification by General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS- Temecula in Temecula in City of 39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which consultation consultation Temecula in states that for projects in areas which were previously undisturbed, with Pechanga with Pechanga consultation or have been determined by a qualified archaeologist in consultation Tribe Tribe with Pechanga with the Pechanga Tribe pursuant to MM 3.4 -1a to be sensitive for Tribe cultural resources, at least 30 days prior to seeking a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop and enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources; appropriate treatment and procedure for inadvertent discoveries; the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1d: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Construction City of City of Verification by General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS- Temecula in Temecula in City of 39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which consultation consultation Temecula in states that if inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural with Pechanga with Pechanga consultation resources are discovered during grading, the Project Applicant, the Tribe Tribe with Pechanga Project Archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the Tribe significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. If the project applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 9 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the City of Temecula City Council. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -1e: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Construction City of City of Verification by General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS- Temecula in Temecula in City of 39, the Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which consultation consultation Temecula in states all sacred sites, should they be encountered within the with Pechanga with Pechanga consultation project area, shall be avoided and preserved as preferred Tribe Tribe with Pechanga mitigation, if feasible. Tribe Mitigation Measure 3.4 -2a: Consistent with the City of Temecula's Pre - Construction City of City of Verification by General Plan Goal 6 and Implementation Procedure OS -2, the Temecula Temecula City of Specific Plan Amendment shall include a new policy which states Temecula that all areas slated for development or other ground- disturbing activities in the Specific Plan Area which contain structures 50 years old or older be surveyed and evaluated for their potential historic significance prior to the City's approval of project plans. The survey shall be carried out by a qualified historian or architectural historian meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Architectural History. If potentially significant resources are encountered during the survey, demolition or substantial alteration of such resources identified shall be avoided. If avoidance of identified historic resources is deemed infeasible, the City shall prepare a treatment plan to include, but not limited to, photo- documentation and public interpretation of the resource. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -4a: Consistent with State law, CEQA Construction City of City of Verification by Guidelines, and the City of Temecula's General Plan Goal 6 and Temecula in Temecula in City of Implementation Procedure OS -26 and OS -39, the Specific Plan consultation consultation Temecula in Amendment shall include a new policy which states that if human with Riverside with Riverside consultation skeletal remains are uncovered during project construction, work in County County Coroner with Riverside the vicinity of the find shall cease and the Riverside County coroner Coroner and and Native County Coroner will be contacted to evaluate the remains If the County coroner Native American and Native determines that the remains are Native American, he or she will American Heritage American contact the Native American Heritage Commission, in accordance Heritage Commission Heritage with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Commission Commission Public Resources Code 5097.98 (as amended by AS 2641). The NAHC will then identify the persons) thought to be the Most Likely Descendent of the deceased Native American, who will then help determine what course of action should be taken in dealing with the remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 10 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendents regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Per Public Resources Code 5097.98, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity, according to generally accepted cultural or archaeological standards or practices, where the Native American human remains are located, is not damaged or disturbed by further development activity until the landowner has discussed and conferred, as prescribed in this section (PRC 5097.98), with the most likely descendents regarding their recommendations, if applicable, taking into account the possibility of multiple human remains. Mitigation Measure 3.4 -5a: The Specific Plan Amendment shall Construction City of City of Verification by include a new policy which states that in the event that Temecula Temecula City of paleontological resources are discovered, the project proponent will Temecula notify a qualified paleontologist. The paleontologist will document the discovery as needed, evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the find under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. If fossil or fossil bearing deposits are discovered during construction, excavations within 50 feet of the find will be temporarily halted or diverted until the discovery is examined by a qualified paleontologist (in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1995)). The paleontologist will notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find. If the City determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist will prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project on the qualities that make the resource important. The plan will be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. Hydrology Mitigation Measure 3.5 -1: Prior to the issuance of a grading or Pre- Construction City of City of Issuance of building permit for individual projects, the project developer shall file / Construction/ Temecula Temecula Building Permit, a NOI with California to comply with the requirements of the NPDES Post- Building Official review of plans, General Construction Permit (Municipal Code, Chapter Chapter Construction or other field verification 8.24). This would include the preparation of a SWPPP incorporating Designee and sign -off by construction BMPs for control of erosion and sedimentation City of Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 11 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks contained in stormwater runoff. The project developer shall be Temecula required by the Stormwater /Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls of the City of Temecula's Municipal Code to submit and implement a SWPPP using BMPs that would effectively reduce or prevent the discharge of pollutants into receiving waters. Noise Measure 3.7 -1 a: The applicant shall ensure, as specified in City of Pre - Construction City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94 -25, that no construction may occur / Construction Temecula within one - quarter (1/4) of a mile of any occupied residence during the following hours: 6:30 PM to 6:30 AM, Monday through Friday. Before 7:00 AM or after 6:30 PM, Saturday. At any time on Sunday or any nationally recognized holiday. Measure 3.7 -1b: The applicant shall ensure that all construction equipment will have properly operating mufflers. Measure 3.7 -1c: The applicant shall ensure that all construction staging shall be performed as far as possible from occupied dwellings. Measure 3.7 -1d: The applicant shall ensure that signs shall be posted at the construction sites that include permitted construction days and hours, and a contact number for the job site. City of Temecula Building Official or other Designee Issuance of Grading Permit and field verification and sign -off by City of Temecula Measure 3.7 -2a: The construction contractor will conduct crack Pre - Construction City of City of Issuance of surveys before construction activities that could cause architectural / Construction Temecula Temecula Grading Permit damage to nearby structures. The survey will include any historic Building Official and field buildings or buildings in poor condition within 15 feet of construction. or other verification and The surveys will be done by photographs, video tape, or visual Designee sign -off by City inventory, and will include inside as well as outside locations. All of Temecula existing cracks in walls, floors, and driveways should be documented with sufficient detail for comparison after construction to determine whether actual vibration damage occurred. A post - construction survey should be conducted to document the condition of the surrounding buildings after the construction is complete. The construction contractor would be liable for construction vibration damage to adjacent structures. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 12 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Measure 3.7 -3a: Building equipment (e.g., HVAC units) shall be Pre - Construction City of City of Issuance of located away from nearby residences, on building rooftops, and / Construction / Temecula Temecula Grading Permit properly shielded by either the rooftop parapet or within an Post- Building Official and field enclosure that effectively blocks the line of sight of the source from Construction or other verification and the nearest receptors. The resultant HVAC noise level shall not Designee sign -off by City exceed 45 dBA at the nearest receptors. of Temecula Measure 3.7 -3b: In order to avoid noise - sensitive hours, commercial and retail shall prohibit loading and unloading activities between the nighttime hours of 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM. Measure 3.7 -3c: To further address the nuisance impact of loading dock/truck delivery noise, all loading areas for commercial and retail uses shall be located at the rear or sides of buildings within the commercial and mixed -use districts, where noise can be directed away from residential uses within the mixed use areas of the project. Measure 3.7 -4: If necessary to comply with the interior noise Pre - Construction City of City of Issuance of a requirements of the City of Temecula and achieve an acceptable / Construction / Temecula Temecula Certificate of interior noise level, noise reduction in the form of sound -rated Post- Building Official Occupancy assemblies (i.e., windows, exterior doors, and walls) shall be Construction or other incorporated into project building design, based upon Designee recommendations of a qualified acoustical engineer. Final recommendations for sound -rated assemblies will depend on the specific building designs and layout of buildings on the site and shall be determined during the design phase. Utilities and Services Measure 3.8 -1 a: The City shall continue to implement its local code Pre - Construction City of City of Issuance of that incorporates standards for parkland dedication and Temecula Temecula Building Permit, development. The City requires (1) the dedication of parkland or the Building Official and sign -off by payment of in -lieu fees and the development of recreation facilities or other City of for all new development; and (2) developers of residential projects Designee Temecula greater than 200 units must dedicate land based on the park acre standard of five acres of usable parkland to 1,000 residents. Measure 3.8 -1 b: The City will identify potential sites for additional park land, monitor demand for park land and facilities concurrent with development approvals, and prioritize potential parkland acquisitions, expansions, and improvements within the five year Capital Improvement Program, consistent with the adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan. Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 13 ESA / D209294 MMRP Apol 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Measure 3.8 -1c: The City shall 1) implement policies and standards of the Parks and Recreation and Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plans, including trail classifications, design standards, implementation mechanisms, and capital improvement programming; and 2) ensure that bike routes are provided or reserved concurrent with new development. Measure 3.8 -3a: Prior to construction in any undeveloped areas, Pre - Construction City of City of Issuance of EMWD shall review the plans for consistency with design criteria. Temecula Temecula Building Permit, Once approved bythe EMWD engineer, the applicant shall paythe Building Official and sign -off by required connection fee to EMWD prior to construction of the sewer or other City of line. Designee Temecula Measure 3.8 -3b: Prior to construction, the project applicant and /or each subsequent project applicant will pay its fair share in mitigation fees to EMWD to upgrade the First Street and the Pujol Street sewer lines. Measure 3.8 -6: All proposed development plans shall designate Pre- Construction City of City of Issuance of adequate and convenient space on the property to be used for Temecula Temecula Building Permit, collecting all recyclable materials generated on the premises. Building Official review of plans, or other field verification Designee and sign -off by City of Temecula Traffic and Transportation Measure 3.9 -1: The project applicant shall incorporate the following Pre- Construction City of City of Issuance of a features into the design of the Specific Plan area Temecula Temecula Certificate of 0 At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road provide a northbound through /right -turn lane combination with a right - turn overlap. 0 Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts in the vicinity of Old Town Front Street and First Street /Santiago Engineer or Occupancy other Designee Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 14 ESA / D209294 MMRP April 2010 and OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Responsible Action Verification of Compliance Monitoring Enforcement Monitoring Indicating Mitigation Measures Phase Agency Agency Compliance Initials Date Remarks Road and Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street in the vicinity of the Moreno Road south loop. 0 Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area, LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Measure 3.9 -2: The project applicant shall incorporate the following Pre- Construction City of City of Issuance of a features into the design of the Specific Plan area Temecula Temecula Certificate of At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road provide a westbound right -turn overlap. Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street /Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries to Old Town. Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area, LOS E and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Engineer or Occupancy other Designee Old Town Specific Plan Amendment 15 ESA / D209294 MMRP April 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING GENERAL PLAN MAPS TO DESIGNATE THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TERRITORY AS SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ( "SPI "), ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES (LOCATED SOUTH OF FIRST STREET), REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES (LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SIXTH STREET AND PUJOL STREET), AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO DEFINE SPI, AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO ADD PROVISIONS REGARDING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LR10 -0011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing. K. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 10- certifying the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the General Plan Amendment hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed General Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted on page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed General Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed General Plan Amendment provides for the implementation of the Amended Old Town Specific Plan with development standards that ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed General Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific Plan was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. California Government Code Section 65358 provides the authority for the City Council to amend the City's General Plan. The City Council, after full consideration of the entirety of the City's General Plan hereby amends the Land Use Element and the Circulation Element of the General Plan as more fully described herein. Section 4. General Plan Amendment. A. The City Council hereby amends the City's General Plan Land Use Policy Map, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to designate the Old Town Specific Plan area with a land use designation called "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) ". This amendment hereby incorporates an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. B. The City Council hereby amends Figure LU -4 (Specific Plan Areas) on page LU -28 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to align the boundaries of SP -5 (the Old Town Specific Plan) to reflect the amended boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. C. The City Council hereby amends pages LU -14, LU -26 and LU -29 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 3, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to define the land use designation "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" and describe that properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. D. The City Council hereby amends pages C -19, C -30 and C -36 of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 4, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service to be as identified in a Specific Plan. Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: IG \'Ix.�K�1�1►Nll�dil�dil:l�:i.� NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk IBARLqw,D R- BA SIXTH ST I • one SIC EXHIBIT I U ILI 15 WM RD - L4 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feet r1gislammap pmjectalpl—inglold tom sp gpfu fcr pc cc kb mxd Land Use Policy Map CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN Specific Plan Implementation RESIDENTIAL RHR Hillside (0 -0.1 Du/Ac Max) 40 F-RR I Rural (0-0.2 Du/Ac Max) Fvt Very Low (0.2-0.4 Du/Ac Max) Low (0.5-2 Du/Ac Max) LM Low Medium (3-6 Du/Ac Max) 0 Medium (7-12 Du/Ac Max) 0 High (13-20 Du/Ac Max) COMMERCIAL / OFFICE F-N-C--] Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial F-HT 7 Highway Tourist Commercial FS-C] Service Commercial F-J507 Professional Office INDUSTRIAL Industrial Park PUBLIC USES & OPEN SPACE PI Public Institutional Facilities CORTE F-VA-1 Vineyards/Agricultural Open Space F-T--TL-] Tribal Trust Lands = Recreation Commercial Overlay 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feet r1gislammap pmjectalpl—inglold tom sp gpfu fcr pc cc kb mxd L A N D U S E Figure LU -4 Specific Plan Areas CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PL Approved Specific Plans SP- 1 Roripaugh Hills SP- 2 Rancho Highlands Sp- 3 Margarita Village Sp- 4 Paloma/Paseo Del Sol Sp- 5 Old Town SP- 6 Campos Verdes SP- 7 Temecula Regional Center SP- 8 Westside/Villages at Old Town SP- 9 Redhawk SP -10 Vail Ranch SP -11 Roripaugh Ranch SP -12 Wolf Creek SP -13 Harveston PDO.4 Temecula Creek Village PDO.5 Rancho Pueblo #106 Dutch Village # 184 Rancho Bella Vista # 213 Wnchester Properties/Silverhawk #265 BorelAirpark # 284 Quinta Do Lago # 286 Winchester 1800 # 238 Crown Valley Village #313 Morgan Hill Future Specific Plans Y Specific Plan Area Y Z Specific Plan Area Z y • EXHIBIT 2 SP-113W ASP -1 • SP-8 'tfi ■ Temecula City Boundary �. Sphere of Influence Boundary ri Planning Area Sauce: Temecula GIS and Cotton/BridgaVAssotlates N 0 5,000 10,000 W Fee Miles S 0 1 — 2 —Ad A■., M SP-3 Center 12 County of Rlverafde SP -10 1' • 3 awre� - - -_ - - -i 1'I_.AN� I I l O F T E M E C U L A G E N E R A L F L A N LU 28 L A N D U L EXHIBIT 3 TABLE LU-1 LAND UsF DFSIGNATIONS r. t%ssumea ueveu or aeveropment crtywrae. �,mce the aeveropment wnucn nas occurrea to Gate nas not reacnect the maximum allowed level of density or intensity, future development is expected to be less than the maximum on a citywide basis. Therefore " tazargget" levels of density/ intensity are used in projecting future development. The target density/ intensity establishes a ceiling within the range which cannot be exceeded without Planning Commission/City Council approval. 2. The target density/intensity does not apply to the Medium and I-Egh Density residential designations. Values listed in the table above are for analysis purposes only. Ill la Range of Target Land Use DUs /Net Acre or DUs /Net Summary Description FAR Acre or FAR' Commercial uses that require extensive floor SC Service 0.25 -1.5 FAR 0.30 FAR area, including home improvement stores, discount retail stores, furniture stores, auto dealershi ps, and light automotive service. Primarily single or multi-tenant offices, PO Professional 030 -10 FAR 035 FAR including legal, design, engineering, medical, Office ... corporate, government, and community facilities. Industrial Uses Business and employment centers including professional offices, research and IP Industrial Park 0.30 -1.5 FAR 0.40 FAR development, laboratories, light manufacturing, storage, industrial supply, and wholesale businesses. Public Uses and Open Space Public and private uses including schools, PI Public/ 0.20 -0.70 FAR 0.30 FAR transportation facilities, government offices, Institutional public utilities, libraries, museums, public art galleries, hospitals, and cultural facilities. Rural, agricultural, and vineyard uses in areas VA Vineyards/ 0.01 -0.2 FAR 0.03 FAR around Temecula. One dwelling unit is Agriculture 0 -0.1 Du/AC 0.1 Du/Ac permitted per lot, as are non - residential buildings necessaryto support vineyard or agricultural operations. Public and private areas of permanent open space for such uses as parks, golf courses, recreation facilities, natural open space, OS Open Space 0.01 -0.1 FAR N/A recreation trails, greenbelts, lakes, utility easements, active fault zones, and undevelopable portions of floodplains along waterways. Tribal lands held in trust that have important TTL Tribal Trust Lands N/A N/A economic and environmental benefit to the City. Territory designated by the General Plan Land Use Policy Map as "SPI" shall refer to SPI Specific Plan Varies Varies its adopted Specific Plan for a description of Implementation allowable uses and densities. r. t%ssumea ueveu or aeveropment crtywrae. �,mce the aeveropment wnucn nas occurrea to Gate nas not reacnect the maximum allowed level of density or intensity, future development is expected to be less than the maximum on a citywide basis. Therefore " tazargget" levels of density/ intensity are used in projecting future development. The target density/ intensity establishes a ceiling within the range which cannot be exceeded without Planning Commission/City Council approval. 2. The target density/intensity does not apply to the Medium and I-Egh Density residential designations. Values listed in the table above are for analysis purposes only. Ill la EXHIBIT 3 Table LU 3 summarizes the development capacity of the Land Use L Plan. Within the Temecula planning area, capacity is provided for approximately 166,250 persons in 53,700 dwelling units. A N SPECIFIC PLANS Many areas within the City and Planning Area are subject to the plans, policies and implementation measures of currently adopted or U anticipated future Specific Plans. The purpose of Specific Plans is to provide comprehensive planning of large areas consistent with the S General Plan. A Specific Plan area designation is used to identify 25 E such areas within the Temecula Planning Area, which because of size, location, and/or special development opportunities require a coordinated and comprehensive planning approach (see Figure LU 4). In identified Specific Plan areas of 100 or more acres, approval of a Specific Plan is required prior to approval of any discretionary land use entitlement or issuance of any building or grading permit. In some areas, Village Center Plans, which allow greater intensities, can also be used. Planned development overlays can be used for smaller areas. Specific Plans must be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 65451 of the California Government Code and the City's Development Code, which contains some additional requirements tailored to meet local needs and conditions. Designated areas will require detailed plans indicating land uses, circulation, major infrastructure and facilities, open space and parks, and appropriate implementation measures. All Specific Plans will be evaluated for consistency with the goals, policies, plans and programs of the General Plan. Approved Specific Plan Areas — As shown in Table LU 4, a total of 23 Specific Plans have been approved within the planning area as of May, 2003. Specific Plan documents for each of these areas are available for reference at the City Planning Department. Approved land uses for each Specific Plan are shown on the Land Use Policy Map. SPI —SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Intensity Range: Varies Target Intensity: Varies Properties designated by the General Plan Land Use Policy Map as Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) allow for land uses that are uniquely defined by areas /zoning districts, standards and design guidelines. C I I ) 0 1 1 1_ Al I � U 1. V (I[, \ I R \ L 1' L \\ LU ?�� EXHIBIT 3 TABLE LU -4 APPROVED SPECIFIC PLAN AREAS Label in Adopted Specific Location Description/ Objectives General Plan Acres Fig. LU -3 Plan Land Uses City of Temecula SP -1 Roripaugh Estates East side of Winchester Pre- incorporation Specific Plan including residential and L, LM, M, 200 Road, north of Margarita commercial/industrial development. NQPO,OS Road and south of Nicolas Road. SP -2 Rancho Highlands South of Rancho Pre- incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1984 including residential and VL, LM, IJ SC; 237 California Road, west of commercial/industrial development. HT, PO, PI, OS Ynez Road. SP -3 Margarita Village East of Margarita Road Pre- incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1988 including residential and VL, L, LM, M, 1,345 and south of La Serena comrnercial/industrial development. NQ PI, OS Way SP -4 Paloma Del Sol/Paseo East of Margarita Road Pre - incorporation Specific Plan, approved in 1988 including residential and LK 1J NC; CC; 1,368 Del Sol between SR-79 South and commercial/industrial development. PO, P1, OS Pauba Road SP -5 Old Town South of Rancho To preserve historic character, enhance economic vitality; improve public 148153 California Road, at the facilities and services, particularly circulation, parlang and drainage; and to SPI intersection of Old Town encourage infill development. Front, mid- between Interstate 15 and the west side of Pujol Streets SP -6 Campos Verdes South of Winchester To provide residential uses near Ynez Road and Winchester Road, designed LK GC, OS, PO 126 Road and East of to accommodate bus shelters and other appropriate transit facilities. Land use Margarita Road densities and design to provide a transition or buffer from adjacent Very Low and Low Medium density residential. SP -7 Temecula Regional Located between To develop a regional commercial core to meet area needs and provide a PO, PI 187 Center Winchester, Ynez and community focal point with high quality site and building design. Margarita Roads, and Overland Drive SP -8 Westside (Villages at Old South and West of Old To provide complementary land uses to Old Town that increase the vitality of K K OS 149 Town) Town, adjacent to City the area; to increase the range of housing opportunities west of 1 -15; and to limits. encourage sensitive site and building design given the topography of the area. C I 1 1 J E 1 1 \1 I C U L A G E N E R A L P L. LLI -29 L A N U `S E PLANS IN ACTION The City strizes to achieve L CS `D" for peak haur ar mection operations and L CS 'iC" for =o peak hour operations. �_ I I 1 `-) I EXHIBIT 4 In most cases, the right -of -way shown on the mid -block cross - sections in Figure G 1 will be adequate to accommodate the through and left turn lanes shown in Table G3. Right turn lanes will typically require some additional right -of -way on one side (the entering side of the intersection). The additional right -of -way shall be a minimum of six feet (10 feet is preferable), and shall extend for at least 250 feet back from the intersection curb face. PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Evaluating the ability of the circulation system to serve Temecula's residents and businesses requires establishing suitable performance criteria. Performance criteria have a policy component that establishes a desired level of service (LOS) and a technical component that specifies how traffic forecast data can be used to measure criteria achievement. The performance criteria used for evaluating volumes and capacities on the City street system are based on peak hour intersection data, since intersections are the primary limiting factor affecting traffic flow on City roadways. Performance criteria for freeway ramps accessing I -15 are based on V/C ratios for each ramp. The performance standards are summarized in Table G4. TABLE C -4 CIRCULATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CRITERIA* Peak Hour Intersection Criteria Intersection capacity utilization (ICU) not to exceed 0.90 (LOS D) Saturation flow rate 1,750 vehicles per hour per lane Clearance interval 0.10 ICU Peak Hour Freeway Ramp Criteria Volume- to- capacity (V /C) ratio not to exceed 1.00 (LOS E) Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., September 2003. *Except as provided in a specific plan. The City of Temecula has an intersection capacity performance standard of 0.90 ICU for peak hour intersection operation impacts except as otherwise provided in a specific plan. This standard means that an intersection is operating at 90 percent of its capacity, corresponding to LOS D. In addition to this ICU analysis, freeway ramps require a special traffic operations analysis. For freeway ramps, the maximum peak hour V/ Cis 1.00. �r 1 2 r-;.,: I C. R_ C H L A F 0 N Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Policy 1.3 Actively monitor the capacity of principal intersections throughout the City. Policy 1.4 When Principal Intersections exceed LOS "D" during peak hours, or LOS "C' during off -peak hours, consider elevating the priority of CIP projects that reduce traffic congestion in these areas. i i i) 1 11 \11, u t\ (; i\ I is \ t 1' 1 \ \ EXHIBIT 4 L h' regulations apply to all new developments and may be applied to current uses that are modified or expanded. There is currently adequate on- street parking in the Old Town area. However, there is a need for additional off - street parking to handle peak-period demand. It 1 GOALS AND POLICIES { ROADWAY Roadway congestion is a major concern to local residents and LCIRCULATION businesses. The City responds to local concerns regarding roadway ' congestion through the identification of acceptable performance for City standards roadways and intersections, as well as access points to regional highways, such as I -15. Except as otherwise provided in a specific plan, tThe stated performance standard serves as the Ifoundation for providing a street network that moves people and goods safely and efficiently throughout the City while ensuring that traffic delays are kept to a minimum. Goal 1 Strive to maintain a Level of Service "D" or better at intersections within the City during peak hours and Level of Service "C" or better during non- peak hours. Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. Policy 1.3 Actively monitor the capacity of principal intersections throughout the City. Policy 1.4 When Principal Intersections exceed LOS "D" during peak hours, or LOS "C' during off -peak hours, consider elevating the priority of CIP projects that reduce traffic congestion in these areas. i i i) 1 11 \11, u t\ (; i\ I is \ t 1' 1 \ \ ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LR10 -0011) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing. K. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 10- certifying the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code (Subsection 17.16.20 (Procedures) of Chapter 17.16 (Specific Plan Zoning District) of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code); The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. Furthermore, the proposed Comprehensive Amendment to the Specific Plan meets the findings as outlined in the Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.16.020. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. Careful deliberation of location, lot dimensions and physical topography of all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan have been considered for each designated planning area regarding anticipated uses and development potential. The Old Town Specific Plan contains design guidelines and development standards that provide site planning, allowable uses, architectural design, landscape, street and sidewalk regulations anticipated to enhance the public's interest, health safety, convenience and welfare of the City. The proposed mixed use designations will provide additional conveniences for city residents to live, work and shop within walking distance. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. A variety of Land Use Designations have been applied to various areas within the Specific Plan including Downtown Core District (DTC), Downtown Core /Hotel Overlay District (DTC /HO), Residential /Limited Mixed Use District (R/LMU), Neighborhood Residential District (NR), Civic District (CV) and Open Space (OS). Careful deliberation of location, lot dimensions and physical topography of all properties with the Old Town Specific Plan have been considered for each designated land use district regarding anticipated uses and development potential. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the existing City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan dated February 8, 1994 as amended last on June 13, 2006 in its entirety with the amended and restated City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan dated May 25, 2010 on file with the City of Temecula City Clerk's office. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , Jeff Comerchero, Mayor r_T40r:61n Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 10- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of I , the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 1► to] x.Ko1l1►NJlNd /l0d /l .1J:4:& 1 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A ZONE CHANGE TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING MAP (LR10 -0011) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the public hearing. K. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 10- certifying the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. L. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Zone Change hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Zoning Map Amendment conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element specifically anticipates that parcels south of Santiago along Old Town Front Street would be zoned to allow for a mixed use overlay in place of its Service Commercial Zoning District. As such, rezoning 2.4 acres of this area from Service Commercial Zoning as part of the Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan conforms to the General Plan Land Use Element since the provisions of the proposed Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan encourage and promote development of mixed use projects. In addition, as part of this Project, the removal of 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan of territory located west of the Pujol Street/Sixth Street intersection is also consistent with the General Plan since the territory will retain its General Plan Land Use Designation of High Density Residential (H) and the parcels will be rezoned High Density Residential (H). This Zoning Amendment is also consistent with Development Code Section 17.02.020 "Consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Districts" matrix which provides guidelines for zoning consistency. The Zoning Map Amendment complies with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations of the General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed Zone Change would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The provisions of the proposed Old Town Specific Plan that will regulate 2.4 acres being rezoned into the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the provisions of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code that will regulate 2.3 acres being rezoned as High Density Residential, will govern the development of the properties including site design, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements and these provisions are intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. C. The subject property of the Zone Change is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The proposed zone change has been analyzed as physically suitable for the anticipated land uses and development projects that are permitted to occur for the subject properties. The 2.3 acres being rezoned as High Density Residential will allow for the same residential density (12 -20 units per acre) development potential as exists under its current zoning designation. Multifamily residential development is anticipated on this property by its existing High Density Residential zoning designation. While the topography of the 2.3 acres is rolling hills, the property is physically capable of accommodating multifamily with the appropriate site design and a variety of building types that would be able to be constructed on the site. In addition, its location would provide residences extraordinary views of Temecula. The 2.4 acres that is being rezoned from Service Commercial Zoning into the Old Town Specific Plan designated as Downtown Core is primarily vacant flat land currently used as a U -haul truck storage area. The property is located at the entrance of the Old Town Specific Plan area and is capable of development that could accommodate commercial or residential units with a variety of building types as permitted by the proposed Downtown Core Zoning Designation. The standards within each proposed zone for both areas being rezoned provides guidelines that are suitable for their anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed Zone Change shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; The proposed zone change will remove 2.3 acres from the existing Old Town Specific Plan (SP -5) /High Density Residential Zoning Designation and rezone the parcels as City of Temecula Zoning Map /High Density Residential which provides substantially the same the land use development capability as contemplated by its current zoning and is compatible with existing and anticipated high density residential development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zone change will also integrate 2.4 acres into the Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan which will ensure that the character of future development is compatible with the area and the south entrance of the Old Town Specific Plan area. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the City's Zoning Map, as described and illustrated in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, to modify the boundaries of SP -5 (Old Town Specific Plan) to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan to be zoned SP -5 (Old Town Specific Plan) and exclude 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan to be zoned as High Density Residential (H). Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of 12010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor r_T40r:61n Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 10- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of I , the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 1► to] x.Ko1l1► [MIN d /l0d /l .1J:4:& 1 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: April 21, 2010 PREPARED BY: Stuart Fisk, Case Planner PROJECT Long Range Planning Project No. LR10 -0011, consisting of a SUMMARY: comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan; a General Plan Amendment to 1) amend the Land Use Policy Map, assigning the territory within the Old Town Specific Plan with a land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" and specifying that all land uses within the Specific Plan shall comply with the provisions of the Specific Plan; and 2) amend the Circulation Element to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan; and a Zoning Map Amendment to modify the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan including 1) the annexation of 2.4 acres located south of First Street into the Old Town Specific Plan (SP -5); and 2) the removal of 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street to be rezoned to High Density Residential (H) RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan, a General Plan Amendment, and a Zone Change; and that City Council certify the project's Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and adopt Statements of Overriding Consideration for the EIR CEQA: Environmental Impact Report PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: City of Temecula General Plan Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HT), Designation: Service Commercial, Low Density Residential (L), Medium Density Residential (M), High Density Residential (H), Public Institutional Facilities (PI), and Open Space (OS) Zoning Designation: SP -5 (Old Town Specific Plan) and Service Commercial Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: North: South East: West: Retail, office, restaurant, residential, motel, other uses, and vacant Retail, office, gas station, hotels, and service commercial uses Retail and vacant Residential Office, retail, service commercial, and vacant BACKGROUND SUMMARY In early 2007, with increased development occurring in Old Town over the previous few years and the new Civic Center being located in the hub of Old Town, questions and concerns were raised by residents, businesses and the development community about what the community's vision for Old Town is as it continues to evolve and change. Of particular concern to the community had been the intensity of building height, building mass and adequate parking. Some individuals had also expressed concerns that the newer developments do not maintain and respect the historic character of Old Town. As a response to these concerns, in mid -2007 the City Council, Planning Commission and Old Town Local Review Board directed Planning and Redevelopment staff to examine these issues, solicit feedback from residents, businesses, property owners and the development community and return with policy recommendations for their consideration which address these concerns. In response to this direction, staff worked with consulting firms Inland Planning +Design and Gibbs Planning Group (planning, urban design and retail marketing), Keyser- Marston (economic feasibility) and Fehr and Peers (parking and circulation) to develop a three -prong approach to analyzing the issues. This approach recognized that the issues go beyond design and building height and mass, but also included market feasibility of different development scenarios for Old Town and the need to identify and provide adequate circulation and parking to serve the Old Town area. Six workshops were held with the community from June to December 2007. These workshops covered the topics of historic and existing conditions, urban design elements, alternative design concepts, market feasibility and parking management and demand. The six workshops were well attended by a mix of business and property owners, residents and concerned citizens. Public feedback included the importance of respecting and maintaining the historic character of Old Town, solving the parking problem, and providing a connection between Old Town and Murrieta Creek. As a result of these six workshops, a series of ten recommendations emerged which were overwhelmingly supported by the workshop attendees. The ten recommendations address the following issues: 1. Historic Core 2. Streets 3. Building Heights 4. Architecture 5. Murrieta Creek Walk 6. Infrastructure 7. Residential Neighborhoods 8. Parking 9. Economic Development 10, North Area of Old Town (vicinity of Moreno Road) On March 25, 2008, staff received authorization from City Council to proceed with a comprehensive amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan to address the abovementioned recommendations developed from the visioning workshops. Staff has completed the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and is now forwarding the draft plan to the Old Town Local Review Board for review and recommendation. Staff presented the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft Program EIR to the Old Town Local Review Board on April 12, 2010 and received a unanimous recommendation from the Board to the Planning Commission and the City Council to adopt the Draft Specific Plan. Pending the Planning Commission's recommendations to City Council, staff intends to seek City Council adoption of the Draft Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, and Zone Change, along with certification of the Draft Program EIR and adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations on May 11, 2010. The Draft Old Town Specific Plan incorporates comprehensive revisions that address the goals and recommendations developed during the Old Town Visioning project, which were based on input received from the community at the abovementioned meetings. Staff is now presenting the Draft Specific Plan to the Planning Commission for review and comment before seeking adoption of the plan by City Council. ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment The proposed General Plan Amendment would change the Land Use Designations for the proposed Old Town Specific Plan area to a single new General Plan designation titled "Specific Plan Implementation" from its current designations of Community Commercial (CC), Highway Tourist Commercial (HT), Service Commercial (SC), Low Density Residential (L), Medium Density Residential (M), High Density Residential (H), Public Institutional Facilities (PI), and Open Space (OS). The purpose of the Specific Plan Implementation land use district would be to ensure consistency between the unique mixed -use development characteristics of the Old Town Specific Plan area and the General Plan by referring directly to the Specific Plan for the intended uses and development characteristics for this area. If approved, the General Plan Amendment would change the General Plan Land Use Map for the area within the proposed Specific Plan boundaries and text would be added to the General Plan Land Use Element identifying the purpose and intent of the Specific Plan Implementation land use designation. Additionally, text changes to the Circulation Element of the General Plan are proposed to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a specific plan. This would address recommendations developed for the Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared for the project's EIR. The Traffic Impact Analysis recommended the use of traffic signals as a traffic mitigation measure, or that the City accepts levels of service E and F inside the Old Town area at the intersections of Old Town Front Street and Second, Third, Main, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Streets. Due to the community's goal for Old Town to develop as a pedestrian oriented area, a series of traffic signals along Old Town Front Street in the Old Town area would not be desirable. Furthermore, accepting levels of service E and F along these specific intersections will assist in creating a greater balance between pedestrian and vehicular activity. 41 Zone Chanoe The proposed Specific Plan would add three parcels located south of First Street, between Old Town Front Street and Murrieta Creek, totaling 2.4 acres. These parcels would be included in the Downtown Core land use district. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan would remove 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan at a location west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. This parcel would be zoned High Density Residential (H) in conformance with its current General Plan land use designation of High Density Residential (H). The proposed boundary changes are illustrated in the attached "Existing and Proposed Specific Plan Boundaries" Exhibit. Specific Plan Amendment To address concerns that the current Specific Plan does not adequately address issues related to building height and massing and that recently constructed buildings do not respect the historic character of Old Town, staff has prepared a comprehensive amendment to the Specific Plan based on input received from the community in developing the abovementioned recommendations. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment will help to ensure that the elements of Old Town listed above are consistently addressed in a manner that will result in a cohesive "downtown." To achieve this, the areas of the Specific Plan that address the abovementioned elements of Old Town have been updated and expanded, and criteria has been added for elements that are not addressed in the current Specific Plan. Additionally, staff has incorporated form -based code principles into the Specific Plan, primarily in the Development Standards and Design Guidelines sections of the Specific Plan. These sections have been completely revised and contain the parameters for development that will facilitate accomplishment of the design goals for Old Town identified in the ten recommendations developed from the Visioning Project. The use of form - based code principles results in less emphasis being placed on permitted land uses and a greater emphasis being placed on building and street forms. The proposed Specific Plan, however, does not altogether ignore land uses, so certain uses are regulated by the plan. Other areas of emphasis for the proposed plan include encouraging mixed -use buildings to help achieve a balance between commercial and residential square footage in Old Town, and encouraging an urban downtown environment for Old Town that is pedestrian friendly. Recognizing that uses will come and go, but that the buildings will serve the community for many years, the proposed Specific Plan emphasizes the relationship between building facades and the public realm, the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types of streets and blocks. Regulations and standards based on form -based code principles, presented in words, illustrations, and photographs have been incorporated into the proposed Specific Plan to designate the appropriate form and scale (and therefore, character) of development in Old Town.' Primary differences in the land use districts between the existing and proposed Specific Plans are outlined below, beginning with a discussion of the proposed land use districts followed by a discussion of the proposed changes to each chapter of the Specific Plan. Downtown Core The Tourist Retail Core land use district identified in the existing Specific Plan has been re- named to "Downtown Core ". The Downtown Core now allows for four stories if at least one floor 4 is residential or if the fourth floor is office and provides parking, and the proposed plan also includes a Hotel Overlay that may be constructed at up to eight stories if developed with a full service hotel containing a restaurant and conference facilities accommodating at least 1,000 people. As with the existing Specific Plan, the proposed plan also encourages mixed -use development and allows for both commercial and residential uses. The land use standards for this district have also been revised using form -based code principles as discussed above. Through the use of form -based code principles, specific regulations and standards are presented within the Specific Plan in both words and diagrams to designate the appropriate building form, scale, massing, and character of the buildings relative to this zoning district of the Specific Plan. This, in turn, defines the streetscape to achieve a pedestrian friendly urban downtown with an active public realm. The permitted building types in the Downtown Core district include rowhouse, courtyard building, and commercial block building types. Permitted frontage types in this district include shop front, arcade, gallery, two -story gallery, and forecourt. The existing Specific Plan has a requirement for a 10 -foot building setback (or an eight foot setback if a continuous arcade is provided), which can result in random, unpredictable building placement. To ensure the continuity of building placement along the street, the front of the buildings must be placed on a 10 -foot build -to -line (10 feet behind the property line). The specific regulations and standards for this area are described in Section IV.D.4.a (pages IV -11 thru IV -26) and Section V.C.2 (pages V -20 thru V -29) of the proposed Specific Plan. Residential /Limited Mixed Use The existing plan designates the area along Moreno Road as Community Commercial and Highway Tourist land use districts, and designates the areas south of the Mary Phillips Senior Center (consisting primarily of single - family homes) as the Tourist Serving Residential land use district. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as `Residential /Limited Mixed Use" districts. The existing Specific Plan allows for residential uses in the area currently designated as Tourist Serving Residential, but does not allow for residential uses in the Moreno Road area (Community Commercial and Highway Tourist districts). The Residential /Limited Mixed Use district expands the option for residential development by allowing for residential throughout the district. As with the existing Specific Plan, the proposed plan would allow for commercial uses throughout the Residential /Limited Mixed Use district. The existing Specific Plan allows for two -story buildings in the Community Commercial and Tourist Serving Residential land use districts, and allows for three -story buildings in the Highway Tourist district. The proposed Specific Plan allows for expanded building floor space and greater flexibility for the use of property in this district by allowing up to three stories throughout the district, and by allowing a full service hotel (with a Conditional Use Permit) of up to eight stories in the Moreno Road area. The existing Specific Plan requires a 25 -foot front building setback in the Highway Tourist and Community Commercial districts and allows for an eight -foot setback in the Tourist Serving Residential district if a continuous arcade is provided. To ensure the continuity of building placement along the street at a pedestrian scale, the proposed Specific Plan eliminates the front setback requirement and replaces it with a ten -foot build -to -line requirement. The proposed Specific Plan also eliminates the 70 percent lot coverage restrictions contained in the existing Specific Plan for the Highway Tourist and Community Commercial districts. 5 The Residential /Limited Mixed Use district allows for a variety of building types including rowhouse, courtyard building, commercial block, bungalow courtyard, duplex, triplex, and quadplex. Permitted frontage types include shop front, arcade, gallery, two -story gallery, forecourt, and stoop. The specific regulations and standards for this area are presented within Section IV.D.4.b (pages IV -27 thru IV -42) and Section V.C.2 (pages V -20 thru V -29) of the Specific Plan. Neighborhood Residential The existing plan designates the area along the east side of Pujol Street as High Density Residential and the area along the west side of Pujol Street as Medium Density Residential land use districts. The High Density Residential district allows for up to 20 units per acre and the Medium Density Residential district allow for up to 12 units per acre. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas as the "Neighborhood Residential' land use district and allows for a density of 20 to 35 units per acre throughout the district. The existing Specific Plan requires a 20 -foot front building setback in both the Medium Density Residential and High Density Residential districts. As with the Downtown Core and Residential /Limited Mixed Use districts, to ensure the continuity of building placement along the street at a pedestrian scale, the proposed Specific Plan also eliminates the front setback requirement in the Neighborhood Residential district and replaces it with a ten -foot build -to -line requirement. The existing Specific Plan also requires a 20 -foot rear building setback, which would be replaced with a 10 -foot rear setback for properties not fronting Murrieta Creek. To accommodate a variety of building types while also establishing a relationship between the future Murrieta Creek Walk and new construction along the west side of the creek, buildings placed on properties facing Murrieta Creek would be require to be built within a variable build -to line located 15 to 20 feet from the property line. The existing Specific Plan limits building height to three stories and a 35 -foot building height in the Medium Density Residential district and to three stories and a 50 -foot building height in the High Density Residential district. The proposed Specific Plan allows for three stories and a 50- foot building height limit throughout the Neighborhood Residential district. Furthermore, for buildings with podium parking in the Neighborhood Residential district, the proposed Specific Plan would not count a podium parking level of a building as a story for the purpose of determining the maximum number of stories, however the building would be required to comply with the 50 -foot building height limit. Additionally, the proposed Specific Plan also eliminates the 30 percent lot coverage restriction of the High Density Residential district and the 35 percent lot coverage restriction of the Medium Density Residential district contained in the existing Specific Plan. The Neighborhood Residential district also utilizes form -based code principals and allows for a variety of building types including rowhouse, courtyard building, bungalow courtyard, duplex, triplex, quadplex, and detached homes with frontage types including porch, arcade, gallery, two - story gallery, forecourt, and stoop. The specific regulations and standards for this area are presented within Section IV.D.4.c (pages IV -43 thru IV -59) and Section V.C.2 (pages V -20 thru V -29) of the Specific Plan. 2 Civic The existing plan designates the Civic Center and Old Town Temecula Community Theater areas as part of the Tourist Retail Core district. The proposed Specific Plan designates these areas part of the Civic land use district. Due to the unique nature of buildings and uses anticipated within the Civic district, development requirements are not codified by the Specific Plan for this district. However, projects in the Civic district are indented to comply with the Circulation and Streetscape Standards contained in Section IV.H of the Specific Plan. Specific Plan Chapters In addition to the abovementioned proposed changes to the Specific Plan, the Introduction chapter of the plan (Chapter I, beginning on page 1 -2) has been revised to add a discussion of the visioning process, the ten recommendations developed through the visioning process, and the resulting vision for Old Town. This chapter has also been updated to include corrections and refinement to the Background and History portion of the chapter. The Goals, Policies and Objectives chapter of the plan (Chapter II, beginning on page II -1) has been significantly expanded to include a comprehensive set of objectives and policies based on the following thematic areas of focus: 1. Community Design 2. Sustainable Development 3. Animating the Public Realm 4. Public Art 5. Land Use /Economics 6. Housing Renaissance 7. Mobility and Transportation 8. Parking Management 9. Murrieta Creek 10. Infrastructure The expanded goals and policies define the community's hope for the future development of Old Town, help guide future decisions for the development of Old Town, and are intended to help identify the intent for future development as it relates to the above listed areas. Additionally, the Goals, Policies and Objectives chapter includes the infrastructure portion of the Specific Plan (Section II.D, beginning on page II -35). This section has been updated and expanded to identify the infrastructure and facility needs for Old Town and to identify how these needs will be met. The infrastructure section of the proposed Specific Plan has also been expanded to include objectives and implementation measures for each of the infrastructure categories, and public parking facilities are now addressed in the infrastructure section. The Administration and Historic Preservation chapter of the Specific Plan (Chapter III, beginning on page III -1) includes a new section (Section III.E) that describes the relationship of the Specific Plan with the California Environmental Quality Act and provides requirements for environmental mitigation with regard to cultural and historical resources. The tables and maps identifying the location of historic buildings and structures in Old Town and outside of Old Town have been updated to reflect changes including the demolition of the J.D. Welty building (previously located on Third Street, adjacent to Murrieta Creek), and the relocation of the Arviso House from the corner of Mercedes and Fourth Street to Pujol Street and relocation of the Escallier house and barn from Main Street to Pujol Street. Chapter IV of the Specific Plan contains the urban development standards for Old Town as discussed above, and also includes criteria for Circulation and Streetscape Standards (beginning on page IV -103). To enhance the pedestrian experience in Old Town, this section of the Specific Plan has been completely revised to place street trees behind the curb with tree grates, to ensure a 5.5 foot clear pedestrian zone between the tree grates and the adjacent property line, to replace the boardwalk along Old Town Front Street with stamped concrete to provide a surface that is easier to traverse, and to establish a street tree theme. The street tree theme consists of Liquid Amber trees along Old Town Front Street and First Street thru Sixth Street on the east side of Murrieta Creek, London Plane trees along Mercedes Street, Moreno Road, Pujol Street, First Street west of Old Town Front Street, and Sixth Street west of Murrieta Creek, and California Sycamores along the future Murrieta Creek Walk trail. Additionally, with first floor of buildings placed on a build -to -line located 10 feet behind the property line three will be additional space for pedestrians and window shopping, for outdoor cafe seating, or for outdoor restaurant seating. This effectively creates an active public realm of 20 feet from the curb to the face of the ground floor of a building. The existing Specific Plan does not provide sufficiently specific guidelines or standards for placement of streetscape elements. As a result, street trees have been inconsistently planted behind the sidewalks, in the middle of the sidewalks, and behind the curbs, and in many cases are impediments to pedestrian traffic. Mailboxes are also inconsistently placed and often conflict with vehicles parking along the street and also create conflicts with pedestrians. Section V of the proposed Specific Plan contains Streetscape Guidelines (beginning on page V -83) that specifically identify locations for street trees, street furnishings, benches, street lighting, trash receptacles, mailboxes, and other street furnishings. The sign section of the proposed Specific Plan (Section IV,J, beginning on page IV -145) allows for an expanded selection of sign types that complement the architectural character of Old Town. Signs that are new to the Specific Plan include internally illuminated signs, sidewalk terrazzo /mosaic signs, and exterior directory signs intended for upper level tenants. In addition, the proposed Specific Plan allows for portable signs /A -frame signs to be displayed any time during business hours, as compared to the existing Specific Plan which limits the display of these signs to Fridays, Saturdays, Sundays, and Monday holidays. The requirements for temporary banner signs has also been revised to allow for banners to be attached to banisters or other elements of the building, to limit sign size to 32 square feet, and to allow for the use of vinyl. Chapter V of the proposed Specific Plan contains the design guidelines for Old Town. This section includes a discussion of Old Town's architectural heritage, which sets the stage for the guidelines relating to building form and building frontages. In addition, this section includes guidelines for parking lots, landscaping, public art, outdoor dining and sidewalk furniture, paving materials, streetscape, allies, and utility equipment placement. The architectural guidelines have been revised to address the ten recommendations developed through the visioning process. The architectural guidelines begin with a discussion of the basic building forms, and then provide detailed descriptions and illustrations for building frontages and architectural styles. 0 The existing Specific Plan does not contain guidelines for public art, but a section has been added to Chapter V of the proposed Specific Plan to address guidelines for public art. These guidelines address locations for public art, symbolic and thematic content, sculptures and monuments, and other types of public art. Additionally, the guidelines for parking lots, landscaping, outdoor dining and sidewalk furniture, streetscape, and utility equipment placement have been revised to reflect the goals of a form -based code and its related focus on a comfortable urban environment for pedestrians. Finally, an appendices chapter (Chapter VI, beginning on page V -1) is a new addition to the Specific Plan that provides a glossary of terms utilized within the Specific Plan, provides a plant list for Old Town, and provides case studies to illustrate how future development can implement various provisions, regulations, and guidelines contained within the plan. In terms of square footages and unit counts, the table below identifies what currently exists today within the Old Town Specific Plan area, what has been approved under the existing Old Town Specific Plan, and what is proposed under the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. The table also compares the differences between the approved and proposed Specific Plan and between what currently exists in Old Town and the proposed Specific Plan: Specific Plan Comparison Table Currently Existing Approved SP Proposed SP Approved /Proposed SP Comparison Existing /Proposed SP Com arison Commercial 537,632 sf 3,641,275 sf 2,235,990 sf - 1,405,285 sf +1,698,358 sf Residential 681,179 sf 1,575,892 sf 2,249,285 sf +673,393 sf +1,568,106 sf 538 du 1,659 du 2,408 du +749 du +1,870 du residents residents residents residents residents +1,948 residents +4,114 residents Civic 143,525 sf 159,809 sf 159,809 sf 0 sf +16,284 sf Open Space 19.7 ac 19.7 ac 25.4 ac +5.7 ac +5.7 ac sf = square feet; du = dwelling units As identified in the above table, the proposed Specific Plan is anticipated to result in a reduction of approximately 1.4 million square feet of commercial area as compared to the existing Specific Plan, and would add approximately 749 residential units. Parking Staff has worked in conjunction with consultants Fehr and Peers on a parking plan for Old Town. Through the development of the parking plan it has been determined that the existing parking supply in Old Town of 1,319 commercial spaces (not including the recently completed parking structure for the Civic Center) is anticipated to meet Old Town's needs for the next ten years. For the 30 -year plan, approximately 1,180 additional commercial parking spaces are expected to be needed at build -out. Staff has determined that a structure at the City's Second Street parking lot could add over 500 parking spaces, and a structure at the City's Sixth Street parking lot could add over 300 parking spaces for a total of over 800 parking spaces within these structures. For the remaining 380 additional commercial parking spaces anticipated to be needed at build -out, commercial development within the Residential /Limited Mixed Use district is anticipated to provide more than 500 additional commercial parking spaces, and hotels within Old Town will also be required to provide parking, thereby providing sufficient commercial parking spaces within the Old Town Specific Plan area. 9 Proposed Revisions to the Draft EIR To allow for additional potential traffic mitigation measures, staff is proposing to revise sections of the Draft EIR to specify that the need and timing for implementation traffic mitigation will be determined by subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, and to allow for enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street/Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street/Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street, either in addition to the roundabouts discussed as mitigation measures in the Draft EIR, or instead of the roundabouts as determined by subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses. These revisions also delete the southern connection of Mercedes Street to Old Town Front Street/First Street/Santiago Road as this extension of Mercedes Street has been determined to be infeasible. A copy of the proposed Draft EIR revisions is provided in the attachment to this staff report titled "Proposed Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Revisions ". Proposed text deletions are shown with strikethrough and proposed text additions are shown in bold text with underlining. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on April 10, 2010 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION A Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared under staff's direction by ESA and was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, organizations, and individuals. The Draft Program EIR was made available for public review and comment for a period of 45 days. The public review and comment period for the Draft EIR established by the State Clearinghouse commenced on March 1, 2010 and expired on April 14, 2010. The City of Temecula received written comments and responded to each comment in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR). A copy of the City's response has been provided to commenting agencies as required by State law. A copy of the Draft EIR document has been provided to the Commission. The environmental analysis identified one area where impacts were not considered to be significant (land use) and five areas where potentially significant impacts were identified which could be avoided or mitigated. These five areas include aesthetics, cultural resources, hydrology, utilities, and traffic and transportation. The EIR contains mitigation measures for those environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact. Three impact areas were identified as resulting in an unavoidable, significant impact and include the following: ➢ Construction, project operation, and cumulative air impacts ➢ Stage goals for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions ➢ Construction, traffic, and cumulative noise impacts In accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council must adopt Statements of Overriding Consideration prior to approving the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment. The Statements of Overriding Consideration state that any significant adverse project effects are acceptable if the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. 10 Among the benefits that this project provides the community are expanded economic opportunities through a more active urban downtown, an increased variety in housing types to complement the City's current housing stock, needed roadway expansion in the Old Town area, the potential for the addition of a full service hotel to serve the Temecula area, and the potential for significant new employment. FINDINGS General Plan Amendment The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan, The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU- 29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU -32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. 11 As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Specific Plan The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU- 29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to General Plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU -32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. 12 The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Olc Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Zone Change The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Zoning Map Amendment conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan, The General Plan Land Use Element specifically anticipates that parcels south of Santiago along Old Town Front Street would be zoned to allow for a mixed use overlay in place of its Service Commercial Zoning District. As such, rezoning 2.4 acres of this area from Service Commercial Zoning as part of the Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan conforms to the General Plan Land Use Element since the provisions of the proposed Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan encourage and promote development of mixed use projects. In addition, as part of this Project, the removal of 2.3 acres from the Specific Plan of territory located west of the Pujol Street/Sixth Street intersection is also consistent with the General Plan since the territory will retain its General Plan Land Use Designation of High Density Residential (H) and the parcels will be rezoned High Density Residential (H). This Zoning Amendment is also consistent with Development Code Section 17.02.020 "Consistency between the General Plan and Zoning Districts" matrix which provides guidelines for zoning consistency. The Zoning Map Amendment complies with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations of the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed Zone Change would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The provisions of the proposed Old Town Specific Plan that will regulate 2.4 acres being rezoned into the Old Town Specific Plan, as well as the provisions of Title 17 of the Temecula Municipal Code that will regulate 2.3 acres being rezoned as High Density Residential, will govern the development of the properties including site design, building height, setbacks, parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements and these provisions are intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project is consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed, and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. The subject property of the Zone Change is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. 13 The proposed zone change has been analyzed as physically suitable for the anticipated land uses and development projects that are permitted to occur for the subject properties. Furthermore, the standards within each proposed zone provides guidelines that are suitable for anticipated land use developments. The proposed Zone Change shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zone change will remove 2.3 acres from the existing Old Town Specific Plan (SP- 5) High Density Residential Zoning Designation and rezone the parcels as City of Temecula Zoning Map /High Density Residential which provides substantially the same the land use development capability as contemplated by its current zoning and is compatible with existing and anticipated high density residential development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed zone change will also integrate 2.4 acres into the Downtown Core Zoning District of the Old Town Specific Plan which will ensure that the character of future development is compatible with the area and the south entrance of the Old Town Specific Plan area. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Existing and Proposed Specific Plan Boundaries Proposed Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Revisions City Website Link to Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft EIR PC Resolution (Environmental Impact Report) PC Resolution (Overall recommendation of City Council actions) Exhibit A Draft CC Ordinance (Amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan) Exhibit B Draft CC Resolution (General Plan Amendment) Exhibit 1 — Land Use Policy Map Exhibit 2 — Specific Plan Areas Map Exhibit 3 — Land Use Element Exhibit 4 — Circulation Element Exhibit C Draft CC Ordinance (Zoning Map Amendment) Exhibit 1 — City Zoning Map Notice of Public Hearing 14 City Of Temecula Lila -ooii 0 ?69 720 1,440 3.160 1� reed T y. mnp S)MGt 'T�n[W h S N f f nl Y. ttefaJnM.onE;smz2 R:V ZM itlm':trr: reo.?sx:N�^n l'ez m? se zAjMb�gFYeo.�bm;C,^.c.lm.Tl:e Gya.asl irtom:�m 7z�z':f etiazrsvo�z aFweli Eee:.�riM(a:'x �a'm_ri: is ema:s lti.:"aCis!u?fo. rxrm.: tr as:: ^_ ¢'v'S� :dr`AN.sa F:ve.X<Pa:�:Sea:V.c�c' GAPLANNING20101LR 10 -0011 Old Town Specific Plan -Comprehensive Amendment \PLANNING \PLANNING COMMISSION \PC Staff Report.doc 16 EXISTING AND PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARIES Existing and Proposed Specific Plan Boundaries T Ex z-- ng Old T awn Speoif;0 Plan Boundary ' IF " - I 0 'TIP, LC It ME Propo>ed Old Tom Sp-cffic Plan BDundary GAPLANNING201MILIR10-0011 Old Tom Specific Plan -Comprehensive AmendmenAPLANNINGPLANNING COMMISSIOMPC Staff Report.doc: 18 PROPOSED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) REVISIONS PROPOSED DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) REVISIONS Draft EIR Page S -51: Measure 3.9 -1: The project applicant shall incorporate the following into the design of the Specific Plan area: • At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road, provide a northbound through /right -turn lane combination with a right -turn overlap. • Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine thresholds -fer need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street /Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries to Old Town • Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street' character of the Old Town area, LOS and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Measure 3.9 -2: The project applicant shall incorporate the following features into the design of the Specific Plan area: • At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road, provide a westbound right -turn overlap. • Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine thresheld5 fer need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street /Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries to Old Town • Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street' character of the Old Town area, LOS and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Draft EIR page 3.9 -10: Roundabout Analysis Roundabouts are a form of intersection control commonly used throughout the world and are gaining increasing momentum throughout the United States. They are circular intersections with specific design and traffic control features that include yield control of all entering traffic, channelized approaches, and appropriate geometric curvature to ensure that travel speeds on the circulatory roadway are typically less than 30 mph. Along with speed reduction and traffic calming elements of the roundabout, the appeal of the roundabout lies in the safety principles it employs. A typical two -way intersection has 32 vehicle -to- vehicle conflict points and 24 vehicle -to- pedestrian conflict points. A modern two -way roundabout has eight vehicle -to- vehicle conflict points and eight vehicle -to- pedestrian conflict points. Fewer conflict points reduce traffic accidents. In conjunction with the efforts to decrease cut - through traffic on Old Town Front Street and allow for a more even traffic distribution, the City of Temecula has-irlso--engaged may enuralze in efforts to enhance the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street/Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street expand McFeedps St- h old .r an the north end, and the inter-seetion of Old Town end. This would allow Mercedes Street to act as another option for northbound and southbound traveling vehicles throughout Old Town. Two proposed potential future roundabouts were analyzed for future conditions at the following intersections': Old Town Front Street at Mercedes Street (Future Extension) in the vicinity of the south loop of Moreno Road Old Town Front Street at-in the vicinity of First Street /Santiago Road�n�ed s S4eet The analysis of the two roundabouts listed above was aimed only at obtaining LOS from a traffic volume perspective, given the potential designs concepts provided by the City of Temecula staff at the time the traffic study was prepared. The designs, layouts, angles of approach, directional orientation, conflict points, internal and external radii measurements, proper signage, pedestrian facilities and any additional operational characteristics of these proposed roundabouts should be carefully calculated by a roundabout expert prior to implementation. However, the analysis shows that they are feasible and could operate at an acceptable LOS. ' RK Engineering Group utilized the SIDRA Intersection Version 4.0 analysis software to study the proposed roundabout. SIDRA Intersection Version 4.0 is a software analysis program that can effectively produce a LOS analysis for roundabouts using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies. c - ' RK Engineering Group utilized the SIDRA Intersection Version 4.0 analysis software to study the proposed roundabout. SIDRA Intersection Version 4.0 is a software analysis program that can effectively produce a LOS analysis for roundabouts using the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies. a As shown in Tables 3.9 -6 and 3.9 -7, the two proposed roundabouts listed above are projected to operate at an acceptable LOS, when taking into account the average delay at each intersection. The proposed roundabouts can be successfully implemented as traffic control devices at-the !eeat'.c: c ,,, ".,,..,, in Appendix a in the t a ffi ,.u. However, if implemented the design elements of these roundabouts should be carefully calculated by an expert prior to implementation. Appendices C and D in the traffic study also include the LOS worksheets for each of the roundabouts (RK Engineering, Inc., 2009). Draft EIR page 3.9 -17: TABLE 3.9 -6 EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH WITH PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection Control' AM Peak Hour Delay" (sec /veh) LOS PM Peak Hour Delay (seclveh) LOS 1. Old Town Front Street/Rancho California Road TS 36.9 D 126.5 F • With Improvements TS 51.2 D 27.1 C 2. Old Town Front Street/North Moreno Road CSS 12.8 C 37.4 E • With All-Way-Stop Control AWS 17.0 C 83.7 F • Traffic signal not feasible due to this intersection's close proximity to Old Town Front Street at Rancho California Road. 3. Old Town Front Street/Mercedes Street RD 7.8 A 21.0 C 4. Old Town Front Street/6" Street AWS 18.3 C 138.0 F • With Traffic Signal TS 5.3 A 10.4 8 5. Old Town Front Street/Main Street AWS 21.5 C 71.2 F • With Traffic Signal TS 11.4 B 13.0 B 6. Old Town Front Street/2n° Street CSS 22.1 C 43.0 E • With Traffic Signal AWS 13.4 B 25.2 D GM Tevm-Front -StreeW- Skeet/Smtiage 7. Road/MersedesStreet RD 46.7 B 25-.0 G •-- See - Appendix- H- in- traffw-s4udy- foFdesign-details, 8. Old Town Front Street/SR- 79/1 -15 SB Ramps TS 32.0 C 25.8 C 9. 1 -15 SB Ramps /Rancho California Road TS 28.2 C 32.0 C 10. 1 -15 NB Ramps /Rancho California Road TS 9.2 A 13.1 B 11. 1 -15 NB Ramps /SR -79 TS 11.5 B 30.9 C 12. Mercedes StreeUMoreno Road CSS 10.6 B 13.7 B 13. Mercedes Street/Main Street CSS 17.6 C 19.4 C 14. Mercedes StreeU3rtl Street CSS 12.3 B 12.4 B TS = Traffic Signal, CSS = Cross Street Stop, AWS = All-Way Stop b Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all -way stop control. For intersections with cross - street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a signal lane) are shown. SOURCE: RK Engineers, Inc., 2009 Draft EIR page 3.9.19: TABLE 3.9 -7 EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH WITH PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Intersection Control' AM Peak Hour -�- Delayb (sec /veh) LOS PM Peak Hour Delay -� (sec /veh) LOS 1. Old Town Front StreeVRancho California Road TS 46.0 D 155.8 F • With Improvements TS 28.8 C 45.5 D 2. Old Town Front Street/North Moreno Road CSS 13.3 B 46.1 F • With All -Way- Stop - Control AWS 17.7 C 91.6 F • Traffic signal not feasible due to this intersection's close proximity to Old Town Front Street at Rancho California Road. 3. Old Town Front Street/Mercedes Street RD 7.4 A 20.6 C 4. Old Town Front Street/6" Street AWS 19.4 C 147.8 F • With Traffic Signal TS 5.4 A 10.3 B 5. Old Town Front Street/Main Street AWS 25.8 D 74.1 F • With Traffic Signal TS 11.8 B 13.0 B 6. Old Town Front Street/2o° Street CSS 24.0 C 44.8 E • With All -Way Stop Control AWS 14.0 B 26.0 D Old- Town-Ftont-&treeVVStreetASantiago 7. Read/Mercedes-Street RD 23.2 C 50.4 D -See -Appendix H- iMraffio�tudy- for- design-details. 8. Old Town Front Street(SR- 79/1 -15 SB Ramps TS 44.9 D 28.6 C 9. 1 -15 SB Ramps /Rancho California Road TS 43.4 D 56.0 F • With Improvements 34.6 C 31.5 C 10. 1 -15 NB Ramps /Rancho California Road TS 9.7 A 16.0 B 11. 1 -15 NB Ramps /SR -79 TS 11.9 B 51.0 D 12. Mercedes Street/Moreno Road CSS 12.8 B 19.1 C 13. Mercedes Street/Main Street CSS 19.1 C 18.9 C 14. Mercedes StreeU3rtl Street CSS 12.7 B 12.5 B a TS = Traffic Signal, CSS = Cross Street Stop, AWS = All -Way Stop b Analysis Software: Traffix, Version 8.0. Per the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with traffic signal or all -way stop control. For intersections with cross- street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a signal lane) are shown. SOURCE: RK Engineers, Inc., 2009 Draft EIR page 3.9- 17/3.9 -18: Measure 3.9 -1: The project applicant shall incorporate the following into the design of the Specific Plan area: • At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road, provide a northbound through /right -turn land combination with a right -turn overlap. • Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine thresholds for need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and/or implementation of Roundabouts at the e nterseet;ons in the vicinity of Old Town Front Street and First Street /Santiago Road ^^^-r edeStree and Old Town Front Street and Mercedes Street in the vicinity of the Moreno Road south loop. • Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area, LOS and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Draft EIR page 3.9- 19/3.9 -20: Measure 3.9 -2: The project applicant shall incorporate the following features into the design of the Specific Plan area: • At the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Rancho California Road, provide a westbound right -turn overlap. • Provide subsequent Traffic Impact Analyses, as development occurs, to determine threshelds -fer need and timing for implementation of enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street /Moreno Road connection to Old Town Front Street and /or implementation of Roundabouts at the north and south entries to Old Town • Provide pedestrian facilities from Old Town Front Street which connect the east and west neighborhood cores with the Old Town Core District. In order to maintain the unique "Main Street" character of the Old Town area, LOS and F will be deemed acceptable on Old Town Front Street from Second Street to Moreno Road North. Draft EIR page 4 -9: Traffic and Transportation The geographic scope of this impact area lies within the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. The roadway network on which construction workers and construction vehicles (including trucks that would transport equipment and fill material to and from the worksite) would travel to access the site consists of regional highways and local roadways. A traffic analysis was conducted for the proposed Specific Plan Amendment project. The traffic analysis also analyzed future traffic conditions which took into account cumulative projects and regional growth. As discussed in Section 3.9 Traffic and Transportation, none of the intersections would operate at an unacceptable LOS after mitigation. Project impacts will be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of proposed mitigation measures such as enhancements to the intersection of Old Town Front Street /Second Street and the northern Mercedes Street connection to Old Town Front Street and/or roundabouts, pedestrian facilities and accepting LOS E and F at �SF an intersections from Second Street to Sixth Street. The proposed project would increase traffic at a lesser rate than the current Specific Plan for the Old Town area. Cumulative conditions were determined by adding the traffic generated by other approved /pending projects. Traffic counts for these projects were estimated based on trip generation rates from ITE's Trip Generation, 8th Edition. The proposed project would not contribute to cumulative traffic and circulation impacts when considered in combination with projects listed in Table 3.9 -5. Therefore, cumulative traffic impacts would not be significant. Draft FIR page 6 -10: Traffic Development under alternative 1 (build -out of the existing Specific Plan) would generate substantially more vehicle trips that the proposed project. The proposed project would increase traffic at a lesser rate than development under Alternative 1. Specifically, development under Alternative 1 would increase traffic by 106,092 ADT, with 5,957 AM peak hour trips and 9,925 PM peak hour trips as compared to the proposed project. Sz/7-�, :d b:,;:, e ; a In comparison to the proposed project, development under Alternative I would not place a major emphasis upon additional pedestrian circulation in the area; therefore, Alternative I would not further reduce the vehicle trips in the area in comparison to the proposed project. Unlike development of the existing OTSP under Alternative 1, the proposed project would implement efforts to reduce cut - through traffic on Old Town Front Street and allow for a more even traffic distribution. Under the proposed project, _based on need as determined by future Traffic Impact Analyses, the r mA^ .i^ a ..i n -on4he o reach Old Tewn Front nerth -end Old Town Front Street/Mercedes Street connection at Old Town Front Street north of the Gateway Arch, may be enhanced. Additionally the intersection of Old Town Front Street and Second Street may be enhanced. and the mterqP.PtJAn of Old Towfi Frent Street at 44_S�"V Read on;d In contrast to development under Alternative 1, based on need as determined by future Traffic Impact Analyses the proposed project weuld- pr-epese may utilize roundabouts as traffic control devices within the Old Town area. Draft F.,IR Appendices: From Appendix G (Traffic Impact Analysis Technical Report), remove Appendix H (Roundabout Information). Future TIAs will determine whether these roundabouts will be utilized, and if they are an engineer will design them and their exact location and configuration will be determined at that time. 8 I eb ,�pryg t y B t 9 \ 1 1 t t Lagontl X10 "oe Perwn:u5oau]vnr ! ap : rcnr:l:0 atiflirV Cwn19 B .rox =POrw�.vsa owOa 1p:rvnoHmriy w..,.: N 9 naor ng GroJp Inc 20~0. +b pima t -+sags � �� � +las 2 l i saos -. �� yr, +swat i f ; t 4 I 5 'o d i i16 ll+ -fJVk �1 �.iiw�i $L19 gg~�says 8 k Od lcwn SPedliePlan EIR 209296 Ftguce 3.3.3 4 Future Tra¢IC DISVINJtlon i CITY WEBSITE LINK TO DRAFT OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AND DRAFT EIR City Website Link to Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft EIR To view the Draft Old Town Specific Plan and Draft EIR from the City's web site, go to 1. http / /laserfiche cityoftemecuIa org /webiink7 /Browse aspx ?dbid =2 . 2. Open the Community Development folder 3. Open the Draft Old Town Specific Plan / EIR folder 4. Open the "Revised Draft Specific Plan" document or the Draft EIR document PC RESOLUTION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PC RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFY THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPT FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, ADOPT A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, AND ADOPT A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM IN CONNECTION WITH A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LR10 -0011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. Section 2. Recommendation. The Planning Commission has considered the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan and has considered the significant and unavoidable environmental impacts of the Project. The Planning Commission finds that there are Project benefits that would outweigh any of the adverse impacts identified in the Draft Environmental Impact Report, and on this basis, recommends that the City Council of the City of Temecula certify the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Old Town Specific Plan, adopt Findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Old Town Specific Plan Project. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21 st day of April 2010. Carl Carey, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 st day of April 2010, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO. 10- OVERALL RECOMMENDATION OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS PC RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TAKE VARIOUS ACTIONS RELATED TO A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LR10 -0011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 953 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council adopt Resolutions and Ordinances substantially in the form of those attached here to, which would: A. Approve a comprehensive ameno'ment to the Old Town Specific Plan that replaces all sections of the existing Old Town Specific Plan. A proposed Ordinance is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. B. Amend the City's General Plan Land Use Policy Map (and all maps within the General Plan) to reflect the modified boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan to annex approximately 2.4 acres located south of First Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and remove approximately 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street from the Old Town Specific Plan, and to designate the territory of the Old Town Specific Plan with a land use designation called Specific Plan Implementation (SPI). Amend the General Pian Land Use Element to specify that all land uses within the boundaries of the Old Town Specific Plan shall comply with the provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan. Amend the City's General Plan Circulation Element to add provisions allowing for intersection level of service to be as identified in a specific plan. A proposed Resolution is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. C. Amend the City's Zoning Map to (1) reflect that approximately 2.4 acres located south of First Street, currently zoned Service Commercial (SC), shall be annexed into the Old Town Specific Plan (SP -5); and (2) reflect that approximately 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street shall be removed from the Old Town Specific Plan (SP -5) and rezoned as High Density Residential (H). A proposed Ordinance is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21 st day of April 2010. Carl Carey, Chairman ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 st day of April 2010, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary EXHIBIT "A" DRAFT CC ORDINANCE NO. 10- AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN ORDINANCE NO. 10- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE AMENDMENT TO THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR10 -0011) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project "). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. After considering all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the 2010 public hearing, and based on the entire record concerning all components of the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report, the Council approved the Project and certified the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula 's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. The existing City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan dated February 8, 1994 as amended last on June 13, 2006 shall be replaced in its entirety with the amended City of Temecula Old Town Specific Plan dated May 25, 2010. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of , 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 10- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk DRAFT CC RESOLUTION NO. 10- GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 10- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING GENERAL PLAN MAPS TO DESIGNATE THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TERRITORY AS SPECIFIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION ( "SPI "), ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 2.4 ACRES (LOCATED SOUTH OF FIRST STREET), REMOVE APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES (LOCATED WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF SIXTH STREET AND PUJOL STREET), AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT TO DEFINE SPI AND SPECIFY THAT ALL LAND USES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN, AND AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT TO ADD PROVISIONS REGARDING INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR10 -011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On February 9, 1994, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Old Town Specific Plan and on February 22, 1994 the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the Old Town Specific Plan. B. Various amendments to the Old Town Specific Plan were adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula since February 22, 1994. C. The proposed amendment to the Old Town Specific Plan is a comprehensive amendment to replace all sections of the Old Town Specific Plan with new and updated information. In addition, an amendment to the City's Zoning Map, General Plan Land Use Policy Map and Specific Plan Area Map modifies the boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres into the Old Town Specific Plan located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street and excludes 2.3 acres from the Old Town Specific Plan located west of the intersection of Sixth Street and Pujol Street. An amendment to the General Plan Land Use Policy Map includes a new land use designation of "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" applied to all properties within the Old Town Specific Plan area. An amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan defines the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to ensure properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. An amendment to the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan adds a provision allowing for intersection level of service as identified in a Specific Plan. ( "Project'). D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Draft Environmental Impact Report ( "EIR ") was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ( "CEQA ") and circulated for public review from March 1, 2010 through April 14, 2010 for a 45 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. F. The Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting, considered the Project on April 12, 2010 at which time the public and the Old Town Local Review Board provided comments to staff and recommended approval of the Project. G. On April 21, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on April 21, 2010, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council certify the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, adopt Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project. I. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including the Old Town Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment and Title 17 Zoning Map Amendment. J. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Environmental Impact Report, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. After considering all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Environmental Impact Report prior to and at the 2010, public hearing, and based on the entire record concerning all components of the Project and the draft Environmental Impact Report, the Council approved the Project and certified the Environmental Impact Report, and adopted Findings pursuant to CEQA, adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment and associated revisions to the General Plan conform to the existing policies within the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Land Use Element, as noted page LU -26, anticipates that the City will provide comprehensive planning of large areas and identifies the Old Town Specific Plan as a specific plan area. Minor General Plan revisions will provide that the new provisions of the Old Town Specific Plan are integrated into the City's General Plan and are required so that the Old Town Specific Plan can be updated to continue to support the City's General Plan objectives for the area as outlined on Page LU -29, including preserving historic character, enhancing economic vitality, improving public facilities and services, circulation, parking and encouraging infill development. The Project also complies with all applicable Development Code Standards required for Specific Plan amendments including Section 17.16.060 (amendments to approved plans) and Section 17.01.040 (relationship to general plan) and is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan goals, policies and objectives. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; The proposed Specific Plan Amendment provides for development standards that would ensure the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment has been reviewed pursuant to the City's General Plan and all applicable State laws and has been found to be consistent with the policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that development within the Old Town Specific Plan area will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments; The subject area of the Old Town Specific Plan consists of approximately 153 acres. As outlined in the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan (page LU- 32), the purpose of Specific Plans is to provide a comprehensive planning document for large areas so that a coordinated planning approach is provided for all anticipated land use developments. As such, the entire project area has been reviewed based on existing structures and future build out potential and is physically suitable for the land use designations provided by the Amended Old Town Specific Plan. D. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment shall ensure the development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; As identified within the City's General Plan Land Use Element, page LU -30, Old Town Temecula is a strong identification point for the City and the City desires to ensure that Old Town remains a focal point for social, cultural, civic, tourist and economic development activities. The Old Town Specific was originally adopted to support and complement the desirable character of Temecula's downtown and the Amended provisions of the Old Town Specific further support its downtown character. The City's General Plan Land Use Element states that the City will continue to implement the Old Town Specific Plan and will modify or amend it as needed to respond to development trends in the area (LU -40). As such, the Amended Old Town Specific Plan provides guidelines that enhance the area economically, preserves its historic cultural and ensure the development of a desirable character compatible with existing and proposed development in Old Town and the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. General Plan Amendment. A. As illustrated on Exhibit 1, the City's General Plan Land Use Policy Map is hereby amended to designate the Old Town Specific Plan area with a land use designation called "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) ". This amendment hereby incorporates an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. B. As illustrated on Exhibit 2, Figure LU -4 (Specific Plan Areas) on page LU- 28 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan is hereby modified to align the boundaries of SP -5 (the Old Town Specific Plan) to reflect the amended boundary of the Old Town Specific Plan to incorporate an additional 2.4 acres located south of First Street along the west side of Old Town Front Street into the Old Town Specific Plan and excludes 2.3 acres located west of the intersection of Sixth and Pujol from the Old Town Specific Plan. C. As redlined on Exhibit 3, pages LU -14, LU -26 and LU -29 of the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan are hereby amended to define the land use designation "Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)" and describe that properties within the land use designation Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) are regulated by the provisions of the Specific Plan. D. As redlined on Exhibit 4, pages C -19, C -30 and C -36 of the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan are hereby amended to add a provision allowing for intersection level of service to be as identified in a Specific Plan. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. LI ■ BALDARAY I ..... .DR .. . . . ...... Lm SC WFC u i . .......... 1 Q SPECIFIC PLAN (SP -5) VERY LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (VL) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L-1) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L -2) LOW MED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LM) MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) - HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H) _ HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL (HR) BUSINESS PARK (13P) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (LI) - COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) _ HIGHVWAY/TOURIST COMMERCIAL (HT) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE (PO) - NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) - SERVICE COMMERCIAL (SC) PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL (PI) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) SPECIFIC PLAN (SP) OPEN SPACE (OS) — PUBLIC PARK / RECREATION (PR) - CONSERVATION (OS-C) O TRIBAL TRUST 4 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feet ,IgmlsR p pA/&9'db^m^94Wd roan sp—ng ror x a kh Md Item No. 23 Approvals City Attorney Director of Finance City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager /City Council FROM: Andre O'Harra, Police Chief DATE: May 11, 2010 SUBJECT: Mall Ring Road Enforcement RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. -10 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 10.22 AND SECTION 10.22.101 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ON PRIVATE ROADS AND PARKING FACILITIES LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 179.1 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (REGIONAL MALL) PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21107.6 AND 21107.8 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: The proposed Ordinance provides that: (1) the provisions of the California Vehicle Code shall apply to the privately owned and maintained roads in the Regional Mall located southeasterly of Winchester Road and Ynez Road and the City of Temecula shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of the California Vehicle Code on said roads; and (2) the provisions of Sections 22350, 23103 and 23109 of the California Vehicle Code (speed, reckless driving and speed contests) shall apply to the privately owned and maintained offstreet parking facilities within the Regional Mall and the City of Temecula shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of Sections 22350, 23103 and 23109 of the California Vehicle Code on said parking facilities. The proposed Ordinance also makes the findings required by Vehicle Code Section 21107.6 that the privately owned and maintained roads within the Regional Mall are generally held open to the public for the purposes of vehicular travel to serve the Regional Mall and other commercial establishments and the findings required by Vehicle Code Section 21107.8 that the privately owned and maintained off - street parking facilities within the Regional Mall are generally held open to the public for purposes of vehicular parking. BACKGROUND: On March 5, 2010, Jeff Kurtz, General Manager of the Promenade Mall, made an official request that the Temecula Police Department enforce the California Vehicle Code on the Mall property to include the Ring Road. In order to provide the Police Department the formal authority to enforce the vehicle code, the City Council must adopt an Ordinance amending the City's Municipal Code. One of the most effective public safety tools the City has is to provide police enforcement and this Ordinance will create safer traffic circulation around the Ring Road and all parking areas around the mall. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance Map ORDINANCE NO. 10 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 10.22 AND SECTION 10.22.101 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PROVIDING FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ON PRIVATE ROADS AND PARKING FACILITIES LOCATED ON APPROXIMATELY 179.1 ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD (REGIONAL MALL) PURSUANT TO VEHICLE CODE SECTIONS 21107.6 AND 21107.8 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 10.22, Enforcement of California Vehicle Code on Private Commercial Property, is hereby added to the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: CHAPTER 10.22 ENFORCEMENT OF CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY Sec. 10.22.010 Enforcement of Vehicle Code on Roads and Parking Facilities at the Regional Mall Located at the Southeast Corner of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. A. Pursuant to the provisions of California Vehicle Code Sections 21107.6 and 21107.8, the City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that: 1. There exists in the City of Temecula an area of approximately 179.1 acres located southeasterly of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, which known as the "Regional Mall." A map depicting the Regional Mall and the privately owned and maintained roads and parking facilities within the Regional Mall is set forth herein as Illustration 10.22.010. California Vehicle Code Sections 21107.6 authorizes the City of Temecula to adopt an ordinance providing for the enforcement of the California Vehicle Code by the City on private streets generally open to the public for purposes of vehicular travel to serve commercial establishments. California Vehicle Code Sections 21107.8 authorizes the City of Temecula to adopt an ordinance providing for the enforcement of Sections 22350, 23103 and 23109 of the California Vehicle Code by the City on privately owned and maintained offstreet parking facilities that are generally held open to the public for purposes of vehicular parking. Both sections allow for enforcement following notice to the property owner and a public hearing unless the property owner posts signs that the provisions of the Vehicle Code will not apply to the privately owned and maintained streets or parking facilities. The owners of the Regional Mall have requested the adoption of an ordinance enacting this section of the Temecula Municipal Code. 3. On May 11, 2010 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing pursuant to the requirements of California Vehicle Code Sections 21107.6 and 21107.8 to consider whether to authorize the enforcement of the Vehicle Code on the privately owned and maintained streets and parking facilities within the Regional Mall and to adopt the ordinance enacting this section of the Temecula Municipal Code. The owners of the Regional Mall property were notified in writing of the public hearing. The public was given the opportunity to speak at the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Following the public hearing and after due consideration of the information presented at the hearing, the City Council adopted the ordinance enacting this section of the Temecula Municipal Code. 4. The privately owned and maintained roads within the Regional Mall are generally held open to the public for the purposes of vehicular travel to serve the Regional Mall and other commercial establishments. The privately owned and maintained offstreet parking facilities within the Regional Mall are generally held open to the public for purposes of vehicular parking B. The provisions of the California Vehicle Code shall apply to the privately owned and maintained roads in the Regional Mall and the City of Temecula shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of the California Vehicle Code on said roads. C. The provisions of Sections 22350, 23103 and 23109 of the California Vehicle Code shall apply to the privately owned and maintained offstreet parking facilities within the Regional Mall and the City of Temecula shall have the authority to enforce the provisions of Sections 22350, 23103 and 23109 of the California Vehicle Code on said parking facilities. Section 2. Illustration 10.22.010 referenced in Section 1 of this Ordinance is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Illustration 10.22.010 shall be codified in the Temecula Municipal Code immediately following Section 10.22.010. Section 3. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid. Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 11th day of May, 2010. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor r_T40r:61n Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 10- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of May, 2010, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 11 th day of May, 2010, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: 1► to] x.Ko1l1►NJlNd /IAd /l1J4:&1 ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, MMC City Clerk