HomeMy WebLinkAbout081210 DH Agenda AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
August 12, 2010 1:30 P.M.
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Planning Director
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning
Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning
Director.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No. 1 1:30 p.m.
Project Number: PA10 -0176
Project Type: Home Product Review
Project Title: Arroyo @Paseo del Sol
Applicant: Jarnne Valdez, Lennar Homes
Project Description: A Home Product Review to construct 73 homes in the Paseo Del Sol
Specific Plan, Tract 24188 consisting of three plan types ranging in
size from 2,129 to 2,860 square feet
Location: Corner of Meadows Parkway and Pauba Road
Environmental Action: Notice of Determination will be issued in compliance with CEQA
Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations
Project Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow /Matt Peters
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at
43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be
available for viewing the Friday before the Director's Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the
meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.cityoftemecula.org.
R: \Directors Hearing\Agendas\201 0\08-12-1 0 Agenda.doc
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: August 12, 2010
PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow /Matt Peters, Case Planner
APPLICANT NAME: Jarnne Valdez, Lennar Homes
PROJECT Planning Application Number PA10 -0176, a Home Product Review
SUMMARY: Application for Lennar Homes to construct 73 homes in the Paseo
Del Sol Specific Plan, Tract 24188 consisting of three plan types
ranging in size from 2,129 to 2,860 square feet, located at the
corner of Meadows Parkway and Pauba Road
Plan 1, one story, 2,129 square feet — 20 units
Spanish (a) — 6 units
Italianate (b) — 6 units
French (c) — 8 units
Plan 2, two story, 2,636 square feet — 25 units
Spanish (a) — 10 units
Italianate (b) — 12 units
French (c) — 3 units
Plan 3, two story, 2,860 square feet — 28 units
Spanish (a) — 9 units
Italianate (b) — 7 units
French (c) — 12 units
CEQA: Notice of Determination
Section 15162
RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
Planning Application No. PA10 -0176 was submitted by Lennar Homes on June 9, 2010. Staff
reviewed the application and provided comments on architectural design and plotting on June
30, 2010. The project was revised to address staff concerns and resubmitted on July 16, 2010.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project involves the construction of single family homes on 73 lots of Tract 24188
within the Paseo del Sol Community. The proposed architecture and plotting was reviewed for
conformance with the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan, as well as for compatibility with the existing
homes in the adjacent neighborhoods.
1
Architecture
The project proposes three floor plans and three architectural styles. The architectural styles
include Spanish, Italianate, and French Country which are consistent with the Eclectic
Mediterranean theme specified as the. master style for the community in the Paloma del Sol
Specific Plan Design Guidelines.
Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of -the
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance which is
compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and provides for variety along the streetscape
and within the residential area.
Various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style:
• Spanish: stucco finish,. concrete 's' the roof, 4:12 roof pitch, decorative tiles, clay pipe
accents, decorative foam trim elements, wood fascias and exposed rafter tails, arched
and recessed multi -pane windows, arched entrances, decorative corbels, and decorative
wood shutters.
• Italianate: two tone stucco finish, concrete 's' tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, column trim with
keystones, decorative foam trim elements andr window shutters, arched elements,
decorative foam accents, and front porches.
• French Country: stucco finish, stone base, hip on gable roof at 4:12 pitch, corbels at
eave, shake style roof shingles, "cottage" style shutters, and vertical pane windows.
The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural
style and elevation. Articulation is provided on all sides of the homes so that each side of each
product provides specific features of the proposed architectural style. Each of the three
proposed styles is defined from the others through the use of door and window types, window
and door trim, garage door design, materials such as stone, roof type and pitch, shutters and
the overall silhouette. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area
have been designed to incorporate architectural enhancements which include shutters, siding at
the gable, and /or additional windows.
Building Elements /Mass, Height and Scale
The proposed project includes 1, one -story floor plan and 2, two -story floor, plans with three
elevations. The units provide adequate articulation in roof forms and offsets to reduce massing
and the elevations are visually broken up with offset facades, changes in materials, architectural
details and /or sloping roof lines. The Paloma del Sol Specific Plan requires single -story volumes
at front setbacks and street corners. Proposed enhancements include second story and single -
story roofline facade elements, decorative wood details, stone veneer, window shutters, and faux
wood siding on elevations, as well as window and door trim. Staff believes the proposed
standard and enhanced elevations meet the requirements of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan.
2
The proposed units include well pronounced front entries with the use of arched entries,
extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors
are distinct and compatible with the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches
provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style.
Additionally, reversed floor plans are encouraged to help achieve a distinctive street scene in
the community. The applicant has incorporated the above mentioned elements and carefully
plotted each plan (setbacks and mixing of each plan) with a distinctive combination of regular
and reversed floor plans to provide variety along the streetscape and variation throughout the
development.
Each elevation provides careful articulation and architectural enhancements. Visual interest is
achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and
depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials accentuate the
various architectural styles.
The proposed elevations for this development meet the intent of the Architectural Design
Guidelines contained within the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan.
Materials and Colors
The Paloma del Sol Specific Plan encourages use of stucco, plaster, masonry as primary wall
material with light earthtone colors on primary wall surfaces and contrasting trim colors. The
project includes nine different combinations of building materials and colors for the three
elevation styles. The color variation, stucco, and cultured stone materials serve to break up the
massing of the two -story units as required in the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The variation of
material and colors helps individualize each home and create character in the neighborhood.
Each proposed architectural style has three distinct color schemes that customize the style.
The materials include a variety of roof types, stucco and trim colors, and decorative features.
The intent of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan has been achieved by ensuring a continuity of
colors, materials and textures throughout the entire development.
Product Placement Plan
The proposed product placement conforms to the requirements in the Architectural Design
Guidelines of the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. A varied and visually interesting street scene
has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans
throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and
elevation type to meet the intent of the design guidelines. The Specific Plan requires
architectural enhancements to all elevations, especially where prominently visible. Elevations
that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed to incorporate
architectural enhancements which include pop outs, shutters, and additional roof elements. The
lots that require additional enhancements are identified on the plotting plan. A Condition of
Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the
Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 31, 2010 and mailed to the
property owners within the required 600 -foot radius.
3
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Paseo
del Sol Specific Plan EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section
15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
The proposed single- family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards
contained in the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The project is also consistent with the
Low Medium Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is
properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and
density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and
fire and building codes.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and general welfare.
The overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building, parking,
circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to
protect the health and safety of those working and living in and around the site. The
project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with
all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety, and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
Vicinity Map
Plan Reductions
DH Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Notice of Public Hearing
4
VICINITY MAP
\ PA1O -0176
—\ \Y ,
\ a `�� i l l
i .
\ \. -�j •� �1 tt ....
�
t
Ilr +l!ii'
\ 10 ' I
I
--
\ L
TR 24188
/ \
, V � 0o,
Ou
LA
s
�t
r) ��� \\fir
,
,
0 500 1 2
� Feet
PLAN REDUCTIONS
I�
�y
„ ARROYO . ''
at Pas,eo Del Sol
City of Temecula, CA
Tract # 24188
L
a
RECEIVED
By
LEN NAR MC)lM ES. CA. aIVC.
n
• y N
r
r • f
7�, l
.S
I
t PLAN 2860 FRENCH COUNTRY PLAN 2636R SPANISH PLAN 2129R ITALINATE
LENN Aft R.
STREET SCENE
Job $: 10006 "
Date: March 30 2010 ARROYO "
KEVIN L. CROOK
Dole: March 15, 2010
Dote: May 12. 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
INC.
City of Temecula, CA
v.�.• ..• C .. .
f
POP -0UT AT
ENHANCED ELEVS
ENHANCED AT ______r_________T_ i ENHANCED ElEVS.
I.. O
rt �
WRATH CREATROOM
t- TRELLIS
.AT M. BEDR M. 0
ENN.ANUED ELEVS
W ROOF PLAN i
4 1
r r.••;�
POP�UT AT
- / EN11.1NCED F.LEVS. RITfN[N,
� f
NED RODf.1T
E NNANCFp E4V5 Q B[DRM 2
DAM 2
2
U ROOF PLAN
GAR.1 .r
POP D REVS
r EM1 R
ENHANCED
L OFFICE BEDRM
PORCH
L k SIIEDRWFAT _________________________
ENHANCED ELEVS.
�•� FLOOR PLAN AREA TABULATION
s.a.: t /. - . r_D•
- -J FIRST FLOOR AREA 2tz9 S0. R.
U ROOF PLAN TOTAL w .WC 821829 Sa. FT.
St.,.: 1/t B - t' -O• uNm -O
LE N IVAFt, PLAN 2129 PORCH 53853 SO So. F,
PO 8253 .
l Job #: 10006
I Date: March 30, 2070 A R R' O Y 0
Date: March 15, 2010 KEVIN L. CROOK g
Date: May 12, 2010. at Pa.Seo Del S ol ARCHITECT
L 0 11 4 p Iz City of Temecula, CA INC.
y[ P: \P,oiKgi0005_L...d ¢ - on4.a \m La.q morAa
L�1
L
V
M. BATH O ORFATROOM .
1
rI i
A.. _ KITCNC.N
I 00
'E BCDRM.'
G � F
BATH1 y,
GARAGE
'�-�- BEDR. BEDRM.3 - AREA TABUI.ATTON
. PORCH rwr o.wsc ern m. rt.
hart.
I _ ____ _________ ____
W
( , T FLOOR PLAN
Scol.: 1 /e' . V -D- .
I L-EN NAM, PLAN 2129x
Job #: 10006
Date: March 30. 2010. " ARR OYO " : . - E
Date: March 15, .2010 KEVIN.L.'CROOK g
Date: May 12, 21110 at Paseo Del S ol ARCHITECT e
18 INC.
D : . B 'Z - City of Temecula, CA
Pbl Dole: Zun 02. -o ®mme wE ®eRUaeE.9m
P: \Project \10006_Cevcr IC - Arroyo \.rel \DI IC.c.q
SPANW
•
FENCE LINE
f
f 'A' LEFT SIDE ELEVATION — —�� _ 'A' FRONT ELEVATION
l *,
4 •
� c
�___ --------- ._ _.._ _.. _____.____ _ FENCE LINE FENCE IINE -------
'A' RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A' REAR ELEVATION
LE N NAR. PLAN 2129
Job H: 10006 " ARROYO " l Date: March 30, 2010 KEVIN L. CROOK
Dote: March 15, 2010
Date: May 12, 2010 at Pasco Del Sol ARCHITECT
f : INC. 13
City of Temecula, CA «��-
i
BLDG. ear.
00
4 •
- -- -- - - - - --
'A' ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'A' ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LE N NAR. PLAN 2129
Job ' "ARROYO"
� Date: March rch 30, 2010
Date: March 15. 2010 KEVIN L. CROOK I
Date: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol
0 P - 6-- - � ARCHITECT
City of Temecula, CA INC.
I.
ITALINATE
ipOMOF➢RfESSED GN EJOOn Min
w,6FD Y.vES.w]wxOp,S
DDUW tlQSYD VnxD0w3
FENCE LD1E
'B' LEFT SIDE ELEVATION _ _ _ 'B' FRONT ELEVATION
t `I
NI
PFIiEE LMk FENCE ILE _. -__-
'WRIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B' REAR ELEVATION
LEN N Aft Ft.
PLAN 2129
Job N: 10006 " ARROYO "
Dote: March 30, 20t0 KEVIN L. CROOK E
o
Date: March 15, 2010
Date: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
City of Temecula, CA INC. x
wn,.a .�
BLDG. BGT.
N
FENCE UNE FENCE LINE
l
'B' ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B' ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LEN NAM. PLAN 2129
Job #: 10006 "A R R O Y O"
Dote: March 30, 2010
Date: March 15, 2010 KEVIN L I
Date: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol L. CROOK
ARCHITECT 5
° '. ' 8 'Z8 ' City of Temecula, CA INC.
L.
i
FRENCH COUNTRY
aoueu wood ro(u(ex wim(x(r[u(r e-
• 1RF[0 Cq/F154rleVl
- _�- --. • U AM(OR(L(SSFO GMU✓.f DOpl N+ix
�_ � �� ReBEDM[EIS ee0 M1OJF8
- � • K /IIGI /eW N�MW.fS
CDaef•E'M1/F SMrtRM
• e.l]WR wfp Ylrtx!!(((1 1100/{el{I!
11 \fl II \� - -
'CLEFT SIDE ELEVATION — - -- — 'C FRONT ELEVATION
BLDG. HGT.
Ni
__
A
'C RIGHT SIDE. ELEVATION 'C REAR ELEVATION
LENNAR.
PLAN 2636
Date. March 30 2010 " ARROYO " KEVIN L CROO
L. K
�
Dote: March 15. 2010
Dote: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
City of Temecula, CA �C�
BLDG.HGT.
N -
FENCE LME MUM!
C ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'C' ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LENNAoz.
PLAN 2636
Job M: 10006 " A �t
Date: March 30, 2010 RROYO KEVIN L. CROOK
Date: March 15, 2010
Dote: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
�
City of Temecula, CA �C .
C Ly�pr. INC
°� .r
POP -0UT AT
FNHANCF.D P IT D iJ
- �
NIANCED ELE \'S.
r', - P01-017 AT
ENHANCED ELEVS.
J 1 RITCIIEA VWA FAMIIY
- � tlEDRM : O M. BATH M. tlEDRM.
'A` ROOF PLAN ` -" � •-
MP-0UT AT - --
!. -� ENHANCED ELEVS,
POP -0LRAT
ENHANCED ELEVS
Y.� NALL
BED_M
PDP -0IT'AT ! JI OiNIAG ,I\'ING
ENHANCED FLE.VS_ BATH I LAU.
BEDRM.4
I ' p ENJRY_
1
i
f BATH
W ROOF PLAN
I
Scak: 1/16" � J' -O'
PORCH
L T �' UARAGE. -
POP -0UT AT ___________ _ _ .—
EN IANCEDELEVS.
BFD0.M ^ 5
i
1 AREATABULATION
PO UT AT
.
ENHANCED ELF. \'S. urt. _____ __ _______ ________
I ..
SECOND FLOOR PLAN FIRST FLOOR PLAN
` I C ROOF PLAN
Scala: 1 /IB'� 1' -0
LEIVN14R,
PLAN 2860
Jab. b: _ " ARROYO "
Date: March rch : 20 2010 KEVIN L. CROOK g
Doter 15 March ,s. 2o;D at Paseo Del Sol -
Date: May rz, , o � ARCHITECT
:..�_
obt Dwte Ju" 12.2111 ' City of Temecula, CA INC s
P: \vre ect \1000E_LCCw. If - A• \-1 \D31.E.g
J
1
�
|
.|
.`
SPANISH
- -------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------
!
WLEFT SIDE ELEVATION WFRONT ELEVATION
4 w
WRIGHT SIDE ELEVATION WREAR ELEVATION
PLAN 2860
Job #: 10006
Dote: March 30 2010 " ARROYO " KEVIN L. CROOKII
)a t 2. ARCHITECT11
Date: May 1 2010 at Pasco Del Sol
0 2 8 -2 City of Temecula, CA
�l
BLDa.HGf.
•
e �f
N
MIME FENCE LME ------- -------- -- ------ N -----------------
W ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION W ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LE N NAR.
PLAN 2860
Job #: 10006 "ARROYO" Date: March 30. 2 ARROYO KEVIN L. CROOK
Dote: March . 1010 at Paseo Del Sol
Do e: 20 10 ARCHITECT
e: May 1
2 � City of Temecula, CA �«. -C
ITALINATE
wr..nrts.•mxr ra+rx
rvo sart mcco
wsm.Ln+or�uurxLs
uv�oi¢cesko cwx¢xuL m *x
MNS®M/ELSUO wACM
• IOW(ASMIrt[U
• WlpOf
• S:IS NXF1rld
aw wuoaiunBOo-
uuomiaia usx anxnuucaxo rLOw
ro-an
f11V 1, LINT
W LEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'Br FRONT ELEVATION
eUnc. HUT.
i
I
�
® II: \ILII \I i FENCE LINE
WRIGHT SIDE ELEVATION W REAR ELEVATION
LENN Aft R.
PLAN 2860
,lob N: 10006
Date: March 30, 2010 " ARROYO " I
Date: March 1 s, 2010 KEVIN L. CROOK
Date: May 12. 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
INC
City of Temecula, CA o�..r........
l
91DG. N47.
N
FENCE IA'E iENCE LINE
'B' ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'B' ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LENNAR. PLAN 2860
Job M: 10006
Date: March 30, 2010 " ARROYO " KEVIN L. CROOK j
Date: March 15, 2010
Date: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
2 � 12 City of Temecula, CA c�.a. IN C.
FRENCH COUNTRY
eouuu000aeluwwrm nree..0 .•
mnrdol
nrasrueow
aunwne
. mcmcduu + *uK
wnw�muaseen r+wroc yaw m.r
xuuorrrESerox+noxa
_ vemxrwasrwoows
. 'cmrreemeuertun
s.uwa mwrnmuien llowsere.s>
- naxe use
nsrmuacrc'sua roa
FETICE
'CLEFT SIDE ELEVATION 'C' FRONT ELEVATION
,tit IX.. ❑G I
�t
N
IFW I If FENCE Lltff
'C RIGIIT SIDE ELEVATION 'C REAR ELEVATION
LENNAWt.
PLAN 2860
Job M: 10006
Dote: March 30, 2010 " ARROYO " KEVIN L. CROOK [
Dote: March 15, 2010
Dote: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
IN C.
0 — City of Temecula, CA CcerrM .
i
BLDG. HOT.
ql
N�
_FENCE LR& FENCE LD/E ___
'C' ENHANCED RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION 'C ENHANCED REAR ELEVATION
LENNAR.
PLAN 2860
Job N: , rch "ARROYO " I
Date: March 30, zolo KEVIN L. CROOK
Date: March 15, 2010
Date: May 12, 2010 at Paseo Del Sol ARCHITECT
INC.
0 '^� City of Temecula, CA e�
HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR:
xl PASEO DEL SOL - "ARROYO"
LANDSCAPE PLANS. City of Temecula, CA
David n EAULT
ASSOCIATES Inc.
_ - - 951129613430
w..w.eemsocbres.c«F�
BUILDER: PROJECT VICINITY SITE MAP
l LENNAR COMMUNITIES 1
VICINITY MAP Z Q
391 N. MAIN STREET, SUITE 301
CORONA, CA 92880 Q =
c oLu E
r� (951) 817 -3567 PH. (951) 817 -3650 FAX veolECT - > - w � w
CONTACT: JARNNE VALDEZ V '�,� LOCATION i •1 1 O Q H
t Q vl O
ARCHITECT: -A J
11 I J �F•\, * \ 1 '1 Q U
3 � m ` I 11 1 \t 1 J
y F il ' f\1 t V 1 1 1
KEVIN L. CROOK ARCHITECT, INC. k u"
1360 REYNOLDS AVE.; SUITE 110 a" $� F yr r�� •,, 111 11
IRVINE, CA 92614
(949) 660 -1587 PH. (949) 660 -1589 FAXj
CONTACT: KEVIN CROOK HOM. BROS. 2006 -PAGE 959 SECTION F -b N.T.S.
CIVIL ENGINEER: GENERAL NOTES GA�� AI;, Q W
I-
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT F(KI) 42S4133 BEFORE START OF , �`'. " " l/ �° '\ J' C.
I
RBF CONSULTING CONSTRUCTION (2 WORKING DAYS OR 48 HOURS). F LLJ.� a �'
1 40810 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE, STE. 100 2. CON TRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO IDENTIFY LOCATION. THE
r' N.P V
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF AL EXISTING UTILITIES, SERVICES. STRUCTURES. AND I O C �
Q
TEMECULA,CA 92591 FEATURES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE ALL '� O. V a U
(951) 676 - 8042 PH (951) 676 - 7240 FAX DAMAGE RESULTING FROM HIS OPERATIONS, N r ' S ' UJ DL a
CONTACT: JOHN TANNER 3. ALL2:I SLOPES 3 FEET IN VERTICAL HEIGHT AND ABOVE SHALL BE PLANTED AND IRRIGATED PER CITY OF En Z Z
�
�f
TEMECUTA GUIDELINES, Z P a
4. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. IN ADDITION 10 THOSE SHOWN ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE REQUIRED DURING J lh U
NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
THE RAINY SEASON FROM OCTOBER I TO APRIL W PER THE COUNTY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS AND COUNTY
ENGINEER'S DIRECTION.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF ALL SOIL AMENDMENT DELIVERY TICKETS UPON REQUEST At PRIOR TO BIDDING AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:. THE FINAL INSPECTION, _
S. CONTRACTORS ON THE JOB SHALL CARRY INSURANCE SATISFACTORY TO THE OWNER AND PROVIDE PPOOF { � ' � ~
OF CERTIFICATION UPON REQUEST. THIS POLICY SHALL NOT LAPSE OR BE CANCELED AT ANYTIME DURING " �;"
DAVID NEAULT ASSOCIATES, INC. PROJECT CONSTRUCTION. SH INDEX
41877 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH SUITE 140 6. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES TO HOLD THE OWNER AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT HARMLESS FRO MANY
CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF HIS OPERATIONS OR THE OPERATIONS OF ANY Of HIS SUB CONTRACTORS. TITLE SHEET LO.I
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92590 (951) MATERIALS, SUPPUERS OR AGENTS
296 -3430 PH (951) 296 -3431 FAX CONTACT: FFNCEAND WALL PUNS L -11-1
.). THE CONTRACT DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS REPRESENT THE FINISHED CONSTRUCTION PRODUCT AND FENCE AND WA LL TYPICAL LI.4 �`•
BRYAN LOVE DO NOT INDICATE METHODS. PROCEDURES, OR SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION.
B. ALL LOCAL MUNICIPAL. AND STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING OR RELATING TO ANY PORTION FENCE AND WALL DETAILS LI.5
OF THIS WORK ARE CONSIDERED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO AND MADE A PART OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. STREET TREE PLAN L2.I - - —
'! 9. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION MEETING WEEN LANDSCAPE ARCH FECT REQUIRED PRIOR TO START OF FRONT YARD TYPICAL PLANTING PLAN L2.2
CONSTRUCTION.
' SLOPE PLANTING PLANS L3.1 -3.2 ea1e: ure.No
10. REFER TO CIVIL ENGINEER PRECISE GRADE PLANS FOR ALL GRADING. DRANAGE AND RETAINING WALL Crap I
SPECIFICATIONS, REFER TO STRUCTURAL ENGINEER SPECIFICATIONS AND STRUCTURAL SOIL REPORT
i SPECIFICATIONS FOR WALL AND STRUCTURE SPECIFICATIONS AS WELL AS SOIL COMPACTION AND d.
DRAINAGE REQUIREMLNtS. .Pale:
II, ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE SCREENED. PLEASE GROUP UTILITIES TOGETHER IN ORDER TO REDUCE INTRUSION. _ .1-1
SCREENING OF UTILITIES IS NOT TO LOOK LIKE AN AFTER - THOUGHT. PLAN PLANTING BEDS AND DESIGN
AROUND UTILITIES. DUE TO THE RELOCATION OF UTILITIES AFTER FILM APPROVAL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL
1 CONTACT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR t0 BEGINNING LANDSCAPE WORK SO THAT THE LANDSCAPE L� .
ARCHITECT CAN REVIEW THE PROJECT UTILITY LOCATIONS AND REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY TO FULL,
SCREEN ALL UTILITIES FROM VIEW.
1 M 10 .h.eN
,I/IIIII,,,III FENCE &WALL LEGEND
SYMBOL DESC RIPTI O N DETAIL
PfRIMEfER WAIL BY OTHERS N/A bavid nEAULT
C' " E 6' HT. SPU
� TFACE BLOCK PILASTER ITAN COLOR) cm, ASSOCIATES Inc.
ICOMMON
......... .......... OCK WALL (TAN COLOR) 8 /l1S
III
\ �II
j ` \I II 2
(PRIVATE REAR YA NON PBLO WALL CVIEWI .9$1 1 296 13430
/I xmw. @assocatez.can'
O 6-6 N TE REAR Y RDS ON PU LO RANI p/ 11.5
I -'y EILI5 Z
~ N
4 J. D_
6'6 "WOOD GATES - A /11.5 Z. Q
Z
�.
~ O Q W 0 Lu
S Q S N O Z
-U j
Y
W
Co
Al �CKE
G \P
.
THESE ARE TYP WALL AND FENCE
/," O
LOCATIONS FCR THE GIVEN MODELS. . W D
SOME HOUSE PLOTS MAY DIFFER BASED H ✓>
� (� T A �•. L, �. t. -� i oN LOi coNFGURAnoNS: N.Z O
u 'c' ? o
1 w ofnncAUOTHESf sHOwN C DID PSG Z a
u
CONSTRUCTION NOTE:
.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL WALL AND y �N
FENCE LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD WITH THE OWNERS L 5;
\ REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION .'ANY
.
+6 \ DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY /
KEY MAP
TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE N
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
b \ SEE SHEET L .4 FOR TYPICAL WALL A FENCE LAYOUT'
a
SEE SHEET LI.S FOR WALL 'AND FENCE DETAILS
A t 'SEE SHEET LI.6 FOR WALL AND FENCE SPECS. tlie:
NOTE: PUBLIC VIEW FENONG II DEFINED AS THE FRONT YARD. SIDE
-
NTS.
YARD OR REAR YARD FENCE RETURN BETWEEN HOUSES, THAT I$ E%POSED tl
70 THE PUBLIC VIEW.
hetlTed'.
_ scale
Cql , t _ _ maPOOna sar,.cx sneer
1 NOTE:awm Enec
; ^`
WALL LENGTH ON CORNER LOTS SHALL BE REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR - = ECL L 1' .
f ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO PORCHES, 0 30 60• 120' c
COURTYARDS ETC.
Scale: 1' =30'. NORTH uT 10 sHeeLs
j FENCE 8 WALL LEGEND L TION NOTE:
OR SHALL VERIFY ALL WALL AND
SYMBOL DESCRIPRON DETM ATIONS IN THE HELD WITH THE OWNERS
'
— — _ _ TIVE PRIOR LO CONSTRUCTION. ANY
PERIMETERWALLBYOTHERS N/A CIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY
O C NERS HITECT rvE AND U1E 6'M. TFACE BLOCK SPU PILASTER (taN COLOR) C /LI.S ARHITECT
5'-b" HT. ON AREA CE BLOCK WALL (TAN COLOR) 8 / L I.S
f� ICOMMDN 4RFA 90EI
............•...... S'- b'HT.IN -TRACT PRECISION BLOCK WALL OANI D /LIS DavidnEAULT
r (PRIVATE REAR YARDS NON - �� ± // ASSOCIATES Inc.
— 0 0 5' Hr. COMBO VIEW WALL E /LI.S 951 1 296 13430
xwx.drwnWCbaarn
•'� � 5- 6`w000 GATES A /LI.S �' - -� � - -� V i OA
g
Lp
1 1
a N
ly
�I r
W , Z
rb
1 { I
-
�
O
Lu
t
G t ,1 C� W� _� w
O O C U
1
(LINE SEE SHEET L1.3 N Z Z o m
w U a
CD l otsw
Ln T
�` E SHEET L1.3
-��'-
��'y��ii� \\ W , s , 1 � ��,� � i >' / ♦ /�Ina11 Mp,1CHLINE S . maw - l.
{+ `/' ,', �I / A , , _ � 1 �t 9 I , � m � � _ i � ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦♦ O KEY MAP
:.! NorE: ,, N - �� ,777 -� 'J',-- .�-- , ♦�♦ ♦♦ -� - +w
PPoOR TO INSTAL- VERIFY
RIM 55 � 4
FOOIP OF EACH MODEL , \ ♦ "
ISIDENBCALTOTHESE SHOWN ;r I t J,' -���� ♦ ♦ ♦� v� Q
;� - ++ -'- ♦♦ SEE SHEET LI<FORTYPICAL WALL B FENCE LAYOUT
U\\II /I' j's"r' �j"sHEFTUa �up3.'�
I ` - -/ -- __ 7111 \ 1111 SEE SHEET LI.5 FOR WALL AND FENCE DETAILS
: N -' 11111111111 1
SEE SHEET L1.b FOR WALL AND FENCE SPECS.
NOTE dhe xi
W O (V 1 111 111 11111111 NOTE: PUBLIC VIEW FENCING IS DEFlNED AS THE FRONT YARD, SIDE '�. P YARD OR REAR YARD FENCE RETURN BETWEEN HOUSES. THAT IS EXPOSED coed;
N.T3.
LOCATIONS FOR THE GIVEN MODELS. H G SHE �L1.3 TO THE PUBLIC VIEW.
DNLO OC MEPLOTS DIFFER BASED LyL 1111111111 `I SEE 8°�
Erawn:
THESE ARE TYPK:AL WAIL AND FENCE UJ
sheet
i_� Z � 11111 P,jC unaerowrte sake Alert I /�
1 111 M NOTE: I I . L
�11j11111111 WALL LENGTH ON CORNER LOTS SHALL BE REDUCED t0 ALLOW FOR p ~ us
ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO PORCHES. !Y -]20E
COURTYARDS. ETC. 0 30' 1 120. 1
Scale: V 30 NORTH e1 10 sh—
s. I
EE SNE� L .2
TGHUNE S Soi Ej l ►uu
LG III I� '
E SEE SHEEi �t 2 w awa '' il I I r' DOVld nEAuLT
MAIGHUN uaa ► ' D ®' ASSOCIATES Inc.
alas ►. ►aaa ► ►�►Nf- �. —•`' ',; I I ! I' 951 1 296 13430
ynPan ►a au ► ►aa ..._ - �'1 1 .. , :• I I '! w ...a�a1M.�
¢ LL
Lu
" ti ; I i; ", ;; Q 1
MATCH �m� u•uw• ►anuaaaO ► ► °anuOanny\ -
--
CAA W Q Q
N N
V
-aaa ►apaoa w.7 1 , -' "� , .. L --- - ��-, - � <. ,.� Vl � •�� ' �, by � '' ,i I��; i�l
+, 1
• I � ;/ �,.. W r l bJ ,`,� C�_. r t D ' - D �'� \` � ~ �1 fU �� ''i ? � - -•� �', ' I
I y •� 'aN J � T Ul � � � ., t � _ . f..l._ Q' '', D I M
..i y . Ul - I -- - tV r�r D I O J at ED
V 1, I td r �I �` Ii W w
• ` J l id . I 1 ti Q z o, OF';
" C rhua
t.� CONSTRUCTION NOTE:
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL WALL AND
FENCE LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD WITH THE OWNERS -
REPRESENTATIVEPRIORTOCONSTRUCTION. ANY
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED IMMEDIATELY
TO THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. \�
KEY MAP
NOTE: PUBLIC VIEW FENCING IS DEFINED AS THE FRONT YARD, SIDE S
YARD OR REAR YARD FENCE RETURN BETWEEN HOUSES, THAT IS EXPOSED
1 TO ME PUBLIC VIEW.
PRIOR TO INSTALL VERIFY / a tryE✓: F'�� /�
FOORIM OF EACH MODEL
ISIDEN TO THESE SHOWN SEE S HE ET L IA FOR TYPICAL WALL &FENCE LAYOUT j, fi r'
NOTE: SEE SHEET LI.5 FOR WALL AND FENCE DETAILS SHFFfji J t
WALL LENGTH ON CORNER LOTS SHALL BE REDUCED i0 ALLOW FOR
ARCHRECTURAL ELEMENTS THAT INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO PORCHES, SEE SHEET LI.6 FOR WALL AND FENCE SPECS, T Eete:
L COURTYARDS. ETC. N S d -
NOTE: cM keC
THESE ARE TYPICAL WALL AND FENCE wale:
LOCATIONS FOR THE GIVEN MODELS
USE PLO MA
SOME HOUTS Y DIFFER BASED �: eneel
ON LOT CONFIGURATIONS,
LORATONS. UnUaDOVnd SarMCe Alen
� 9 120
0 30 6 u6 iQ1 NQ
' 0' ' . ?T -?e0E
L1.3
Scale: 30 N O R T H d 10 sneers
Y�
Da
- I
�> wd nEAUU.
ASSOCIATES Inc.
G $ - 951 1296 13430
II I iii S
I . > 'IC —
_[ _ I i
10 Z Q' U
Q 1 S - Q j. Y
! �. _ >- Lli U
,c
tl
Q
L..
10 .
S
I
GARCIA WAY � `.
i
\\ ------ ----------- - i , -� ��• (CUL -DE -SAC - �`_ \�� BRADSHAW DRIVE o
�\ \
J
I. \ �. -- `- - - - - -- FLOOR PLAN 2AR - TYPICAL WALL AND FENCE LAYOUT
I"=10 FLOOR PLAN 3B - TYPICAL WALL AND FENCE LAYOUT I"=10 O w
W a
�.. -- — -- — p c Q
0 U 'o U
BRADSHAW DRIVE LL] Q O
Nz
Q za ov
FLOOR PLAN 1AR - TYPICAL WALL AND FENCE LAYOUT I " =I0' !"T 1J o
t�
I..� FENCE , & WALL LEGEND \`
SYMBOL DESC RIPTI O N DETAIL -
6' HT. SPLITFACE BLOCK PILASTER (TAN COLOR) C / LI.5�
'.' }I{}H}H}}}✓•}}}{.(} 5' -6" HT. SPUTFACE BLOCK WALL (TAN COLOR) D / L1.5 � -- - -- -
(COMMON AREA SIDE) ETHESE i.
tYVIOAE WALL AND fExCE
....... ........ 5' -6'HT. IN -TRACT PRECISION BLOCK WALL(TAN) TS M AT Y DIfiER WED GIVEN E DE6. SOME AT MD ON lOt
(PRIVATE REAR YARDS NON - PUBLIC VIEW) E / LI.S � nnoNS. erawn.
cnedee:
(..� 5' -6" WOOD GATES B / LI.5 .le -
meat
L1
Et .10 shoats
i
e O, TI —
\ I S9
rg
1 j I
29 `� � V
f9
- V - 1
69 ` N(V V cl ONIISIX3
L
L
L- -
o sm m - - - -- - � ,• �� � l� I 2a ,i,se \ ` II I I �
� A L
(' ' ! I '• 1
m i C
of G al I
na
F ��s� � rs e .'� �I!_ �:1 se I — � se .• lyl 2 I I �
J �I
Q
6a I d�T' i
7 i
fr I
2 - I III
I
' ���•••r „'2���JJJ •B2 ii..�.:i6 /r� G�' - ryKJi Cf � 1 L , t I I I • il
_ - - 9t sr 8 1
v , - - - - - - -- ---- ---- --
r l
/
A
x
s Ell ti�H>r PASEO DEL SOL ' ARROYO” LENNAR COMMUNITIES LANDSCAPE PLANS 4 391 N. Main Street, Suite 301 CITY OF TEMECULA o sa
Corona, CA 92880 > y�
o (951) 817 -3600 STREET TREE PLAN o R
I
David nEAULT
— ASSOCIATES Inc.
V�� / 9>1
pu
w
I
_ I — IJ
— %
Z Q
o d, � z
I '
OCL
,. • U a
I QU
I
% O
GARCIA WAY V�
+� �. .#•j•� •'� — j / (CUL -DE -SAC) \ \\\ BRADSHAW DRIVE
-
� o
J
FLOOR PLAN 2AR - FRONT YARD TYPICAL PLANTING PLAN I'• =10' FLOOR PLAN 3B - FRONT YARD TYPICAL PLANTING PLAN I' =10' Q w •5
SUMMARY SUMMARY J N 0
W N m ED
QUAM. SIZE DESCRIPTION pUANT. SIZE DESCRIPTION O
O.cQ°
.. (1) 24" BOX STREET TREE (SEE STREET TREE LEGEND) (1) 24" BOX STREET TREE (SEE STREET TREE LEGENDI O U O U M
BRADSHAW DRIVE I IS GALLON TREES (2) 15 GALLON TREES W d' O
(4J $GALLON VERTICAL SHRUBS (2I $GALLON VERTICAL SHRUBS
(7) 5CALLON FOUNDATION SHRUBS N Q Z C
(19) 1 GALLON ACCENT SHRUBS ( 5 GALLON FOUNDATION SHRUBS Z O
(20) I GALLON ACCENT SHRUBS Q Z p Lo FLOOR PLAN IAR - FRONT YARD TYPICAL PLANTING PLAN V =10' (1) 1 GALLON VINES - (1) 1 GALLON VINES f` U a
534 S.F. FLATS Ya12 "O.C. GROUNDCOVER 832 S.F. FLATS 012 "O.C. GROUNDCOVER
Z 441 S.F. SOD TURF 530 S.F. SOD TURF
SUMMARY
V � QUANT. SIZE DESCRIPTION FRONTYARD TYPICALS - PLANT LEGEND CONTD. BOTANKAI AME COMMON NAME SRE PLANT FACTOR BOTANICALNAME COMMON NAME SIZE PLANTFACTOR ("
� (3) 24" BOX STREET TREE (SEE STREET TREE LEGEND) STREET REE ACCENTSNRUB :uG,p// ( 4) 2) 15 GALLON TREES N 6 u ""
,�`•� tS VE A FptR+IGHI IRr IGUION
( $GALLON VERTICAL SHRUBS ( Z SEE SrRES TREE LEGENp
HEU O mocuus IRAHICLI —R�r Eo DArLrtv MEDIUM
(8) 5 GALLON FOUNDATION SHRUBS s.A HIIRS oFP<wul5 Rose+,AR• iowUM
(I1) 5GALL0 N SIDE YARD SHRUBS AulwzAmHasaus+ RA�IGEZ GAROOPAw
(18) 1 GALLON ACCENT SHRUBS LANDSCAPE TREE cnSCAa gaWHiEAFEO AGAVE `owuM
(I) i GALLON VINES Ato vE S1 RA R1ATA CORAL ALO- Low
1,024S.F. FLATS a12"O.C. GROUNDCOVER O A BLI.L.— STRA- 1— Low VINE
i Y+ArcHEr
I 5525.F. SOD TURF L CRAPE MVVnE MEERuM ----o- oBTKTUS BUCOIATORIA RED TxuMPD VINE. IGALLON MED:uM
+ TRACHELOSPERMUM TASMINOIDES STAR 1ASIIF MFO�UM
VERrICAI SHRUB GROUNDCOVER tlarB:
( UNUSCARIXiNIANA CAROLINA LAUREL CHERRY 5GALL - AC
OI NEED BCHAISP. PIGEONPOINT' nRF GO OTE. aRUSH ELAII IZO.C. LOw drawn:
- STREET TREE LEGEND O +FE xnEwFSrvErvr Lonc LEAF CUOw wooD MmuM Mro =oauM P.'PUrAH CREEx' PROS EM cASroPOauM Low
f OSMANTHUSFRAGRANS LOw R051ARINUS O. "+ROSTRn1U5' gA1E ROSARY Lo,, STREET NAME BOTANICAL SIZ
COMMON NAME E PLAIT FACTOR POOOCARPUS HEN%ELA MFfJI $PRE efeb
ATHONIV OR EODU pWARi TALI FESCUE SOD MEpUM
NAC%[DR 1 OUERCUSVAR N
EVER -E T HRUB
MAR $Neel
L I DAY,D Po V DNrvF PRUS T A MUS PA_ ADRn[e ORIA FEAT. AR .'aOx FOREGROUND S
2A BOx MFOUM OO RANCSIAPDOP �UA AFAAVEN-Y BAMBOO 5GALLOH MEpUM
pAHL DVE PY CUERYAHA ORNAMENIAI PEAR BO%
GA ��.� LID lu" RCIA wA. AU+Ui ACERIFOUA LONDON PANE TREE 2-ol FLAEAGI'US-NICA$ IA-111
ANUC%LEAND CULDESAC —N-0-12,17.51 AHp6a.ae1 ROSA—RERG• S nEE BERRY
KTB -eG ROSE
PPUNUS <FRnLFFNA PURPLE LEAF PLUM 21BOx MfOUM LIGUSTRUM rE%nNUM TExAS PRIVET UM
d 10 Shee s
' e
�
`
ITT I
eg
ES �Hb'd DMI SIX-7
.r
9
A v
xi
00 '
2� 3C 1 1 I
9C
�'` n(� / 7 �J / __�_ I
Z — g 6 PCB i' ES L I � ..� rl � 1�
a 1
/S II 6C 2 I2
qlpgm
I
z
1 1 i 92 i Ea p I
1
_ p
311 /&U 7faly 0 I 11
I I
I II II 1
¢ 02 61 9/ C/
a I t i or 1 I p I
Q PASEO DEL SOL " ARROYO "
LENNAR COMMUNITIES LANDSCAPE PLANS r
p {� 391 N. Main Street, Suite 301 CITY OF TEMECULA o
C orona, 2
9 51) 817 3600 PLANTING PLAN
%..4. oi p
a,ro,v o ci-- ig oi a oi
1-0
:P.,P.w
d3AOXN( hO 3a01S
.01
NOIIVOS'UU13d01S
.0Zo=-- CD
.o�— --dOIS
- Z c)
Z >
. M
0 >
P ON9031 INVId 1vn1d3:)N05
n g. 0
P > 0
� C) oz ot o
ol 3: m
ts
C, CD F
C
O—Z IHJGH.9C - .Z t 3dOIS IV:)Idki IHOIIH,Z I - .0 3dOIS IVOIdAl
c m
--
(D li
W
o
L-j
>
z C) > ... ....
0
m n
>
- m 0
;o m
a n 0
K > z ��j �� j j �/
m
z
OVVC I 96Z I t96
*OUI S31VI00%V
110v3u PJAD(]
N-71
• � ,.nw.<.n<...R . �� � .. way, ,n.E..,, a ��IS9e. ». ..pow, ..x ,.,.. a <Ww� ' � ... R ..n.ro
CD
Via` �I III E ��
I
•' ^� yl.I II C , x,mrt uw�srv.ua sm.
') SHRUB PLANTING Q PLANTING PE AND STAKING PLANTIN TREE SLOPE PLANTING ,,.
III L I
Lu
CL
r - ..v
rman.o, dd, .00moxu s..an<. x rau„x.,. o. n�x.w,xe...ncvu
VINE ATTACHMENT a K µa O Q
LOW STUCCO WALL TO WALL GROUND. s LINEAR ROOT BARRIER U) U Z
w.aw g , M i .. W Lug
Q
1 1 j U F �°
j O
ui
na�wK.
r
g
PLATING .
STUCCO PILASTER STUCCO SIGN WALL ... .... .,,. CONST DEf
i
510
�. ELEVAT
ION
FRONT ELEVATION
L. PLAN uro><r®
A;)
ENTRY MONUMENT � \ "l D -1 5� _�
1
I
ARROYO in PASEO DEL SOL
TRACT NO. 24188
' — --- RKWA1'
2 �' ► • ti � � � � � ; la rosrxl
,. ?? 1 ICRT
x; I JAR zBR I nTm .Tl 4e um
2BR A } • WI rnm wm11m p nc4
-- -- A
�RR.9l2S 1� _ D
ac ro 1[r l.uoTr, en.m. M • w
—
2BR T .. I mmnn vu[ v rcslw an M
. D76Mtllp OOG.EM MSC N SILL Z
I * MLO� Mp'IOED � wlpll IMExf Q
M RSIp IS .p1LVCD 9[CICIC Owl w.
. . 14ut. 9 iIlY 01 061p S. mw5.
. R CR T .S. 5 1 ICIV.I[p
i
• •\ - PAR 3a r 2BR l-
PAR CR 2B I ro M �cwo.np aC w
nr
' IB . ` 2C M .Pa10.a OC M aFtlSf (i1.DIW
1 �- �.
1 I .nlw ro
M. � b -
i 71 it 16, 3L' It �9 11
�AR TIM
BR 16 IJ 11 ♦ I 19 -1.°T Naan
rI `� i J 1 - J R �rl I; 2B
69 7 R 1L I • 17 I 2BR - r
2a --- JAR— TI. rrc
* * -r-� 1 _ I fS -r n.w 1 1:1a .1> nl
^''AA P7 1 - 1aR II r-
I ARC
F�
2 0 f I
eBR es
65 G� 56' ILR
PR 3f s> r7 2a I
f
JAR 3 _ !C 1C B
* 2BR AR i �_ 28
`��� • - I 0.IN A
PA
PR
I
i — —
PA10 -0176
PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN =»aT
L E N N A R ARROYO in PASEO DEL SOL
• � ..� �.�� ° 319 N. WIN STREET. SUITE .101 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 24188
C ON�ULTINO p CM". CA 92880
(951) 817 -3621 City of Temecula 6 1
The proposed single- family homes are permitted in the land use designation
standards contained in the Paloma del Sol Specific Plan. The project is also
consistent with the Low Medium Residential land use designation contained in
the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is
physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed.
The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements
of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare;
The overall design of the single - family homes, including the site,. building,
parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with
and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in and
around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has
been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and
regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and
function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Director hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of
the Development Plan Application:
A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the
previously adopted Paloma del Sol Specific Plan EIR and is, therefore, exempt from
further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations).
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0176, a Home Product Review Application
for Lennar Homes to construct 73 homes in the Paseo Del Sol Specific Plan, Tract
24188 at the corner of Meadows Parkway and Pauba Road. The homes will consist of
three plan types ranging in size from 2,129 to 2,860 square feet, subject to the
Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Director this 12 day of August 2010
Patrick Richardson, Planning Director
I, Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby
certify that the forgoing DH Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by
the Planning Director of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held 'on the
12 day of August 2010.
Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary
DH RESOLUTION
DH RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0176, A HOME PRODUCT
REVIEW APPLICATION FOR LENNAR HOMES TO
CONSTRUCT 73 HOMES IN THE PASEO DEL SOL
SPECIFIC PLAN, TRACT 24188 CONSISTING OF THREE
PLAN TYPES RANGING IN SIZE FROM 2,129 TO 2,860
SQUARE FEET, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF
MEADOWS PARKWAY AND PAUBA ROAD
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On January 8, 2002, the City Council approved the Paseo del Sol Specific
Plan No. 219 Amendment No. 8, Environmental Impact Report No. 235 Addendum No.
4, and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 24188.
B. On June 9, 2010, Lennar Homes, filed Planning Application No. PA10-
0176 Development Plan for Home Product Review Application in a manner in accord
with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
D. The Planning' Director, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
and environmental review on August 12, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
E. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA10 -0176
subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application No. PA10 -0176, conformed to the City of Temecula's General Plan and
Paloma del Sol Specific Plan
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Director, in approving Planning
Application No. PA10 -0176, hereby makes the following findings as required by
Development Code Section 17.05.010F.
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City;
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA10 -0176
Project Description: A Home Product Review Application for Lennar Homes to construct
73 homes in the Paseo Del Sol Specific Plan, Tract 24188 consisting
of three plan types ranging in size from 2,129 to 2,860 square feet,
located at the corner of Meadows Parkway and Pauba Road
Tract Map No.: Tract 24188
MSHCP Category: Single Family Residential (less than 8 du /ac)
DIF Category: Residential - Detached
TUMF Category: Single Family Residential
Approval Date: August 12, 2010
Expiration Date: August 12, 2012
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project
PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/
developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above,
the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the
City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or
proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages
resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to
include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials,
officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall
promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to
which this condition is.applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the
action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the
best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this project.
PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for
good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a
time.
PL -6. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific
Plan No. 219.
PL -7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within EIR No. 235.
PL -8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
PL -9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
PL -10. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
PL -11. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers,
landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the
property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or
repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters.
Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure
all trash bins are covered at all times.
PL -12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL -13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
PL -14. All enhanced elevation locations identified on the Product Placement Plan shall also be
identified on the Precise Grading Plans (asterisk) and Building Construction Plans
(note).
PL -15. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and
construction debris.
PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
PL -17. All parkways, including within the right -of -way, entryway median, landscaping, walls,
fencing, recreational facilities and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property
owner or maintenance association.
PL -18. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District Maintenance
Superintendent for a pre- design meeting to discuss design perimeters and obtain
Temecula Community Services District Landscape Standards. The median landscape
plans submitted for consideration for Temecula Community Services District
maintenance shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District
Landscape Standards.
PL -19. Construction of the landscaped median shall commence pursuant to a preconstruction
meeting with the developer, Temecula Community Services District Maintenance
Superintendent, Building and Safety Inspector and Public Works Inspector. Developer
shall comply with City and Temecula Community Services District review and
inspections processes.
PL -20. The developer, the developer's successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the
maintenance of the landscaped median until such time as those responsibilities are
accepted by the Temecula Community Services District or other responsible party.
PL -21. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by
the developer..
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PL -22. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise
the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of
the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion
may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably
necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified
specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of
the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource,
the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director."
PL -23. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL -24. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the
plants shall be shown.. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance
and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The
plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee
Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
PL -25. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The
contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation
inspection."
PL -26. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per
Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost
estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water
budget.
PL -27. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who
shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL -28. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape
site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation installation with
open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-
to -head coverage, and to verify that all planting have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper
landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance bond." The
applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections.
PL -29. Automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaped areas and complete screening
of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent
property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub
planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to
66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not
be limited to, private slopes and common areas.
PL -30. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six
months of the completion of grading, it shall be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for
dust and soil erosion control.
PL -31. The plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within
private common areas.
PL -32. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Wall and Fence Plans.
PL -33. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans
including all structural setback measurements.
PL -34. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the
construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in
any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be
shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
PL -35. Roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision;
however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with
Planning Director approval.
PL -36. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements
made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and
demolition debris.
PL -37. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs
first, the developer shall complete the Temecula Community Services District
application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy
fees.
PL -38. The landscape construction drawings for the landscaped median shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Services.
PL -39. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement to install the landscaped
median.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
PL -40. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification
by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance
shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and
irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final
landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate -of use and occupancy is not required for
the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling
for the final inspection.
PL -41. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL -42. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for
inspection.
PL -43. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA
landscaped area.
PL -44. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department
for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to
the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL -45. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
PL -46. The landscaped median shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Community Services.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way.
PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way.
PW -4. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and
existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x
36" City of Temecula mylars.
PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase and permanent pollution prevention
controls into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging
off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water.
PW -6. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Paseo Del Sol
Specific Plan and all subsequent amendments as approved on January 8, 2002.
PW -7. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Vesting
Tentative Tract Map No. 24188 and all the subsequent amendments as approved on
January 8, 2002.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PW -8. A finalized WQMP must be accepted by the City prior to issuance of any grading
permits.
PW -9. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and
private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
PW -10. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading
Ordinance Section 18.24.120.
PW -11. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and pavement sections.
PW -12. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual,
and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
PW -13. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) shall be available at the site throughout
the duration of construction activities.
PW -14. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearance from the Planning Department, or other affected agencies.
PW -15. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PW -16. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil
engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
PW -17. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and
Developer dated August 28, 2001.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
PW -1 B. Prior to the first certificate of occupancy, the developer shall ensure that the WQMP
measures associated with this development have been installed and ready for
implementation.
PW -19. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive
written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water
District, or other affected agencies.
PW -20. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works.
PW -21. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
PW -22. The Developer shall ensure that BMPs are installed to delineate between construction
zones and occupied zones.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing.
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING DIRECTOR to consider the matter described below:
Case No: PA10 -0176
Applicant: Jarnne Valdez, Lennar Homes
Proposal: A Home Product Review Application for Lennar Homes to construct 73 homes in
the Paseo Del Sol Specific Plan, Tract 24188 consisting of three plan types
ranging in size from 2,129 to 2,860 square feet, located at the corner of Meadows
Parkway and Pauba Road
Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination
will be filed in compliance with CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations
Case Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow /Matt Peters; (951) 694 -6409
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Main Conference Room
Date of Hearing: August 12, 2010
Time of Hearing: 1:30 p.m.
e
" "^ " 1 - ;,1_4� r" � � dp `� � �� �... a, „�✓
rn
PA10 -0176
o< r ,.-
r
r
f
1_
� 4
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Director before the hearing or may appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for
judicial review of a decision of the Planning Director shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by,
Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of, Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding
seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Director,
shall be limited to, those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200
Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project
may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694 -6409.