HomeMy WebLinkAbout090910 DH Agenda . AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
September 9, 2010 1:30 P.M.
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Planning Director
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning
Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the
Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning
Director.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No. 1 1:30 p.m.
Project Number: PA09-0061
Project Type: Development Plan/Conditional Use Permit
Project Title: Jehovah Witness Hall
Applicant: Joseph Van Haaster
Project Description: A Development Plan with Conditional Use Permit to construct and
operate an 8,264 square foot religious facility on 3.15 acres with
Very Low Residential (VL) zoning
Location: Northeast corner of Calle Girasol and Aussie Avenue at 31640 Calle
Girasol
Environmental Action: Mitigated Negative Declaration will be adopted in accordance with
CEQA Section 15070
Project Planner: Eric Jones
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at
43200 Business Park Drive and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be
available for viewing the Friday before the Director's Hearing after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the
meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.cityoftemecula.org.
R:\Directors Hearing�Agendas\2010\09-09-10 Agenda.doc
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
DIRECTOR'S HEARING
DATE OF MEETING: September 9, 2010
PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner
PROJECT Planning Application Number PA09-0061, a Development Plan with
SUMMARY: a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a 8,264 square
foot religious facility on 3.15 acres within VL zoning, generally
located on the northeast corner of Calle Girasol and Aussie Avenue
at 31640 Calle Girasol
RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions
CEQA: Mitigated Negative Declaration w/ Monitoring Plan
Section 15070
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Joseph Van Haaster
General Plan Very Low (VL) Residential
Designation:
Zoning Designation: Very Low (VL) Residential
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Site: Vacant LoWery Low (VL) Residential
North: Existing Single Family Residents/Very Low (VL) Residential
South: Calle Girasol-City Park/Open Space (OS)
East: Existing Single Family Residents/Very Low (VL) Residential
West: Calle Girasol-City Park/Open Space (OS)
Existinq/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Repuired
Lot Area: 2.32 Acres 1 Acre
Total Floor Area/Ratio: 0.8 0.20
Landscape Area/Coverage: 42 Percent N/A
Parking Required/Provided: 125 Provided 120 Required
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\STAFF REPORT.doc
1
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On February 23, 2009, Joseph Van Haaster Submitted Planning Application No. PA10-0061, a
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow for an 8,264 religious facility to be
located within an area zoned Very Low (VL) residential. The project will feature one structure
housing two auditoriums, restrooms, and space for meetings and conferences. Staff has
worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant
concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. No daycare or formal educational
institution is proposed as part of the project.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project site will be constructed on a parcel totaling 2.32 acres in a Very Low (VL) residential
zoning district. Calle Girasol wraps around a portion of the property and boarders the subject
property to the west and south. Aussie Avenue boarders the property to the north. The project
is surrounded by custom single-family homes to the north and east and a City Park located to
the south and west.
The project will consist of a one-story 8,264 square foot religious facility. This structure will
contain two auditoriums, restrooms, and space for meetings and conferences and will be
located along the west portion of Calle Girasol. Ingress and egress to the facility's parking lot
will occur along Calle Girasol. Given the fixed seat arrangement of the facility, a total of 120
parking spaces are required per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code.
However, the applicant has chosen to provide an additional five parking spaces bring the total
amount of parking to 125 spaces. The site plan illustrates that pavers and stamped concrete
will be utilized as a way to enhance the aesthetic quality of th� drop-off and parking area. A
split rail fence will surround the entire property. This type of fencing is consistent with the rural
residential appearance of Nicolas Valley.
Architecture
The building's formal symmetry, simplicity and privacy are common to many Kingdom Hall
projects. The project is located in an area zoned Very Low (VL) residential with custom single-
family homes, and the goal of the project is to incorporate residential features. This goal is
achieved by incorporation of elements typical of custom residential developments in the area.
Elements include, but are not limited to, shutters (used in the place of windows), stone used at
the base of columns, and flat roof tiles. The end result is a project that blends in with the
surrounding residential structures.
Landscapinq
Landscaping will encompass 42 percent of the project area. Most of this concentration will
occur along Calle Girasol and Aussie Avenue. A landscaped bio-retention basin will also be
located along the eastern portion of the project. Landscaping for the project will feature a
variety of trees, shrubs and ground cover. These plant materials will surround the property and
will soften the hardscape features such as pedestrian walkways, drive isles, and parking areas.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on August 28, 2010 and mailed to
the property owners within the required 600-foot radius.
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\STAFF REPORT.doc
2
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared for the project.
An Initial Study was prepared for the project in an effort to further evaluate if the project would
generate any potentially significanf impacts to the environment. This document was submitted
for distribution and review on May 25, 2010. The results of the Initial Study show environmental
impacts for the project are all /ess than significant with the mitigation proposed in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program developed for the project.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Section 17.050.010.F)
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City.
The project has been conditioned to ensure it is in conformance with the City of
Temecula General Plan and other Ordinances of the City, and State Law.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Planning, Building and Safety,
Public Works, Fire, Community Services and Police Departments to ensure the project is
designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In addition,
the project has a/so been reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part
of the Initial Study process to further ensure that the project will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, and general welfare.
Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E)
3. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development
Code.
The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential district.
These types of uses require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. The project has
been reviewed and conditioned to ensure it is consistent with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
4. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development
of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not
adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures.
The proposed use is for a religious facility located within a Very Low (VL) residential
district. According to the City of Temecula Development Code, these types of uses are
allowed in all residential districts upon fhe approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Custom
single-family homes surround the project on all sides with the exception of the south and
west sides. An existing public park is located at these directions. The project has been
reviewed and conditioned by the Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works, Fire,
Community Services and Police Departments to ensure it will not adversely affect
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\STAFF REPORT.doc
3
adjacent uses, buildings or structures. In addition, external government agencies have
had an opportunity review and comment on the project during the Initial Study process.
5. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and
other development features prescribed in this Development Code and required by the
Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the
neighborhood.
The proposed project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Planning Building and
Safety, Public Works, Fire, Community Services and Police Departments to ensure that
the requirements for yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features required in the City of Temecula
Development Code have been satisfied. As a result, the project is designed to integrate
into the surrounding area.
6. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and
general welfare of the community.
The project is for a religious facility located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning district.
Religious facilities are a conditionally permitted use in the VL zone. Two religious
facilities already exist in the immediate area. The project has been reviewed and
conditioned by the Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works, Fire, Community
Services and Police Departments to ensure that the project will not be detrimental to the
health, safety and general welfare of the community.
7. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a
conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole
before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal.
The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the
Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a
whole before the Director of Planning.
ATTAC H M ENTS
Vicinity Map
Plan Reductions
Resolution
Exhibit A- Draft Conditions of Approval
Initial Study
Mitigation Monitoring Plan
Notice of Public Hearing
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\STAFF REPORT.doc
4
VICINITY MAP
- ['L...� �- 3 � 7 f { -�' .t l, r r'�� •
� y j;�"_.� ' i � � . / � 7 „� i . ..� � � � 3 . ,
..jj I t 3.. � � �" �, 1 � I
,"' � _ ( r �L i DTRAIC�`p'+ � � . � �i� .y t � :. � t Y' �f� - � ` r f C ;, '� ���
, I �
:; ��,, ; < �Lt�'� R �i�'�, �=� -; �` "{� �frF��o
, _
r ��� w �i �. i ; , �
� ,-- ' - - � - _ - ._ MUR . j r i VE I.�: :��., _ ---. .._....._. _. � .
�_. . � eamaaa.aaa.o �' — � j
_ RIETA F{p�'�.'�j i � � . _ �! �,
��� ����� ' ���S��CR��K il� u���� G'$\ e�o��a.e�.a�am�eamama ' e� a �.evoaeas�..cas�.+
I 1
� � � � �/� ����� R � oom�an c
, ' i ��> .____�.
,. .
,
� S � � � � � � � l� t
� F I � � �
� � �i
t i II r' � � � �E t E�i'� t . � " `�` �OLb�CRE�K.CjR"� �� �� �l'' CR � ,� 1 � � �l,
; ,.
�
, .
, _._.
i a --`�1` .< �. �r ,t i t
� ' �_ � W � /' � � ,
, � � �
,•� �� n . O �...._ . I � ..� y 1
f :z I � � j .�' r � r ,� � �
� � 111 �: �, ��. � € -� � _w�i � i ,'-� 7 + i f- m rr rf - -- - � 4 ' t
� � C� p . i
� 1 � -� - --. �.��
,�'A �, �, . Eh � t ,�`�p $_ f � , 'I , � r __ ____ ;
�._ I '�, --. �
.. r S 1� � j. l �.N - � , � '� J t " � S- '�i� + � i / �
_ SUV i ` � � � � a .J ..._.! ' i � ) ~ {+� -� / 1 r ' �
�-��i �" t' ��_.-__.. ;;�'°�'t�SVtYUNE��R'��� � `�.LLl.1 j� � ' I � I
_.� .. . , ,
. . , � - _. . ___ • ' ,
..:. .>...,_ : `:. f :,,. -1 �.a..:, t . _ �... _....
" i1f . ........._...._ . ....� .�_ ._ .... ......_. _.. ._..' _ « � �O
_-•.. ...... .__"._.
_ I t , ` � ' , � � � � r= CAMINO CIELQ. , -....�...--- "p�
�
� � � � � �� � � ��G
' w f J i � _,. _ _ i /IIw... .. -. r , ff. VALLEY.�RD
_ � � � �, ' � __._.__._........ j,
� � �1 � q 2�
� � �' .�' G `i� �� �"~`�� - - -_...� '�- /�i `�`� i : �
! r�
� � _ ._.�� r � _ T
:,, •� _
� �� � .� ...._� r- _ .,_._..,` � .. �.� ;� .
: � i \ ` �""._ < i [ � U t
� `�€ l li ,i o � z.._ �, � 1 " °" /� ' / � _
� i :1 � 1 i `` � � � `�.,>�Y' � /%
- ,
, �,
.,
.: `5 . - _ I r �� 7 Q_ W""� � / � J _ - `'
_ ., / �
... � � � / 1 \�,, � � f - �—LIEFER RD - j-� �_� t t
,
i / f �
t . �.,� �� 7' f �. ��� � � �; . r ��� ,-''��'t1� _ � - 1�r•`-f'"`_ " -
_
( f ti
... .., „v , ,. , � , 1 4- /,
�- a �. _ �
,
� . �,
, , ,
� , ;
:
,
.,,_ _. � , % ,,
, `: z ,j
_:
�. i � .�', , � ......__ � � � 1 ; �P- ��`�
i " �
w �. ,
.�:_ � E "O. i � , '��.
� �r�� � -� 1 � ,,, .�� �. , `- E :�` �� -.
i f _. . ... ........ , \
.... G i' �.. s . .� A i
}
,__._ ,
. � � `�' ' ;� ;� ..
r, �f r , �� � ' `+--i� - � � , „ Project Site _ �_. ��._�,�,� � �� R f .�
;� y � � ,_. __....... . __ . . _ � l .� ` �� � ` t � _ _ _ �_ _
` � �I � i ..-„ i i ,` i _ a' H �OF+
; �(. �
..�. � r- .�_---�-� � , . . .. ____ RD _
_ : __ _ _ , ,
� �, •
t � _ , _ _.�_, � ,,,�`'�� �\
. ( I I +- ' _ �
� �,:� � # GATLINRDi = � ��� f � i � �I
JONS_P ; � �
...__ __...,.___. . __.._:� , , , �
� � \ �; �^`� � ; r
ri '> > �{ �G� - I A""� t � i t
�,'
' � � 4 � I ` ....... ' '
.
� * /.... _ . .... ......... � .�--°• , � ,, "'-^,-�.
i �� _...-..""..�,..'y ,�� �. � � ,� � \ 1 f r � � ( a '-^``�, j
"- ,
.
w ... � �
� ..._, i � � `Za�..w*.�.�
� e.--[-' �(i � ; � \\ ;�:�sN '; \ � p 3 -- _-�..
, ;
�� , o r . � t .�p t'� r ;� �\ _�...___ ...Z� - �.�� ._....
. � r � ; ; �
�
; • - _
�
r � m , � � �;-� �: --� ____..
t r' '
,/-i , ` / � < ,r
; " ; t � �m , ' I �! '. .�- " � ! U � ��
/ " � , c.� ° ' �- �� `'`� , r � ' w .
.
z ti rr � 1 ; �-'` - l r' � , i--� — i .....�,
; � .-. �,/
/ , ��, A
/ r ...( ` % I 3 m
.�� : � � � ' ` -' � � � I I .. ,
, �,/'� �! � ' ......
, ' '",. .>� m.» � � ✓.-_'
/
�. � �� � �- � � Y �� ,,,% a � � I � l �� I � CALtEGHAPOS.� _..x»� __.. SOUt���QY� -
� � � � ��d� �� �
� �.; _.... .. �
� _ �.. �. _ , _ __::_ ...:. I
; -'
, ��__ � ? �V� �� L�OFRC�cy �� f j � -� 1�.. � °—� � �ana��_..— —'°_--
� ° ; .
�
____ — . , ��1�-; , c �, i , �
r ;
'
'
r �
2 EG •: •. . A
I , �! L� i�:�l��� ' -�`' � ��
� _.... _ �.._ _ 7 _ �
;
;�
- ___ —5 ' /
(_ 1 r�
w _ _-" . ' _�,j'^'�.�,�,(�:� �/, ��' 'J -� � -. r ' _1 ..,�' \ i
�� �, } 1 � vj',f / ``` � "�.� ;��� � �j ' 3+'� . \
"'� � � r i � ��� � I
.,
� 1 t
> {-- � --z � i �
. _
J `,,� i r � 1 __
� �LN°`'
i , � r GT ti � � � ,< 4 �":`. J
�^ � ,` � P
\� I �
, ,_____-__.._ ' 11 � T _ __..�_____. A
y �.,� , ,�,`�. ~``���. 1 � �� f ;. VIST OE;OE20:
, ,, G O
� ... r �, : � - ! G . ��, O�' / �i j �
, ; ,
� < �� " " C T�a ��. � � n � � ; �>....�...,., 1 �,.. � z
•,• f \ � /�, v� . �� ' � �J.,d ... X ., , .:,`4' ;� �>,� 1
t _.. .. ...
� �.. . r „.._ � � / ; .� �
.. ' .��r a. ..� , .
� /
� � , t t �.-, r C�y � r `� 1. \ ., l� r �`� ,Z __._.....�.. .. .. � v � � j �
r i �' r �F ; � � VN �^ �{ � � � �_ 1 m
a Wy ` � ` �� , � � A
4 _4 O Z
, 4
; '� ? !,� ,� � <
„ f � rti; '"^ v a j/ �' �' � 7 J. � + �� � f _ VIST,4=:DEL M0(Vl
✓� �, / ., .. �;�.: i � �� � Q � � f E:RD
, \ i C• N ,," , J�9Rd . ,, �..� �_ � i '� ; r� " �. _W� � � E , i
...-t J 1,� ..,,-;, ` � �� G'�, ' �J C�rY "`;�\.0,,1 / `� � i � ; KAREN.L-Y.NN L-N---; r ! I i
, `",, \'�� � : / �,:!f � �� '� � r � ''r 7 3 � � s !
.. ,
,,, . .
� , . ; . ,,� � �� � � _ � 1
~ "3- `�' r c �-.._ t
y
� , , ..� ��, � " �� ` �� ��� � f j,. f � y..� r f7 - r ! i � �
�,, �� �`.. � � � �,,c' � / ,�
' . ' �° / ��s ' � r l �` � l` �' , � w' �` 1' � ~S -- -- -
� � FM
.. .. � L. ' � !
. - / � �\ ..( i r' j ���� � � , p .t j ,... � � r � "� 7 ) � � 1 � f _._._ i
� , �� . � ' �.,,;�.( � � ... tC' � �.. q f l t �� _ _ _ __ i
.. . N ` .... ! * '.---' �. �. , ; i '�, y �� '�o -s t � ,4 � " ��GAS . p� I , i - .. _ _ ` �
1.... � LL -L L I rY�- - :, y � � � � �.2 ��.. "`"�,t'`-Y, � ( -,.J � � _, �f'/,'`l�' \ `� ��� i ! r----.. ........� ,
._ � ��. l .� ; .;: : �, f � , (,' (- , �. � �-� 1 ; i ~ ;` /-�;
� ,�, V. � I ,�/ .`' � � �;� �� Y ` �� �S V -/ ' ' P i, � ;"� � � i �,/
�' ..:. /! i � � , r / ��' � C " ` R � , ✓� � \ • ! _... _... � �.""-. �% �
fi � -� �
_.� � � ' '
G ��.� � � ' /�s" ,�"` ,i. ! 1 ;� ` /,i\ ' � ; - =�-�-� l,. .! , r ..,, . � ��,, � � �---- G,
<: � � � �
/ i E!�CP�L� r � � � ��'p�� �r �� r � `� � � � i i t r � . ��N�\a �' D t
.. ; t � I.... \� '� t y� � CT� � ' A����tA `, t `�� � ! � ; D
i � , r � ....,� ��" � a �� �e_ � � ?` } �, � 5 .� �
_ I � I �, ZON�
I �. � --.. r �� � � ` � ` �; � � �" � ; , ; - �u�� , � < ..-
� w I
y`...._. 't.. ...,.�.,� 1 . �,..... � ,�.- t . �`•,,t � � .y� � i ,' .t4AN�nCT;.r' a.' i i-s' - } _ _. ..... . ...
I. ( ', �.0�\ } � _ � KPH!N;� � '�� r _� 7 r ? r -. � ,! �i r a ! 1 \ `Y ` ti x � �- _ __ _ .. . . .._ _
��µ (�CCARP'(; i ; j , �.'�.. i r �C�P' ,' r I
� 6 i � `. � � �`� ,� J � �. r � �EIGH � S�''� $ PL { {
i ` "' l�' � ! � \ -' J �, 1 D � � ; Y`:\ ��' �x� �,� i ��� �j'P�`� ` I ; _ '
✓ � ; i . ` -�� f ,��. v`
i., r � `FELIGItA , `•; .''' ! ' � / �� ^� ` f l \ y y ��' � - -C/ f�� �'' 'l.�-�"(/�� ' , � i
� � ' � t _ ( � J � � l .. � // ��� �� / �a'l� Y"'">SK.-.'�L,,,-�� 4
.. T q . ._r ..--' �•• jl�.^t/`;C�. V � JJ \ V\ I t�L i` p r � �,.,..
\ ., -� __ VE ` � j � , ,� ., .'' " ,�� � . ; 5,���, � ��/!� �-�- t -� �..�/,�-
,. ..� _ , : �� , �,t� A�` �< ` 1.-+� 1 � ..>',;�,� �r�\,�iti �_.r. �� �. j�; �' � 1
z
r NlO � \ �
: � ; � � ._ r � RE'PpS _. � � �� �` � �>' �C�r� c,i� rt 1 �' ! 1�'
; �. � ,
f �, �' �
f � 7 :� A ,
; N � . i � J ;. ; _ ._ � ;,, '° �uw+c1 v �: �- yt r � .-�'"},, ���� , � r � 50 ' 2,000
, �r , �
, . . � ��
..,� , ��,�. . ; �..�.L. rt t ` Y �� � Feet
_� . ___.. � � `� ; „ ,,.r • � �' �
-� l � 0 , 1,000
�( ���
�,_�.._. �. ,_ �! � Z,;s l\ i�---' , l � i i t ' ,I..=�i±1_ /� ��Y - ---� -(`"�'1' 1--. ` `_ i i : ;
PLAN REDUCTIONS
�
a � � Oa���ao�o �o�c�a�ao��0 U�c� pc�r��a�
aa
�. Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Vllitnesses
. ,
31640 Calle Girasol � Temecula, CA t
PROJECT DATA RBFERENCES SHEET INDEX Q�
PROJECT LOCATION: sicrux ro TITLE �� Z�
31640 CAI.LE GIRASOL swa. �o. —� ""` T.i Tme s�r ceNEwu wFarauna� � Z
TEMECUCA,CA92592 . y� . . (7 a.A
vrna = N
OWNER/APPLICANT s�cer �w. � ffi910x°"'�•"�„� si o s� ww. ���
TEMECULA VALLEV CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES . �� Z Ur �
41221VIAANITA,TEMECULACA92592 . O �� �i RWRNGRADPIGFlANBROTPLW
PH:951�82 O G7 GRAOY1GGt0595ECitlNS � Z �
� ' � �MLWfECNNAL . . � . . . O � �
OCCUPANCY 0 �•�•,•� tizo rtoa+vux LL � rn
GROUP M3 O aa.o o�aoa �v�mu J J••
oaano '131D � E70fWGlIFESAFEIVRAN.
Um
NEW BUILDING AREA O ��+��� ��
. .E.tA RqTp1ETPoC51fEPlAN
8.261 SQ. FT. � ��
wnsuve
TYPEOFCANSTRUCTION ABBREVIATIONS �'� ���
t-z wwreicvux
. . . TYPE V�N . . . . . ur �emc rwv, nom rz . rac rrwouzrx roxo rocwc � � . . ld� . � RANfNGDEfAflS � .
. .�rc neo�[ nwv, uuoe r[ ue� r�¢ crn:aav�A um¢i � rrn. nmesru �
winm.w rw. , nsWCO) FIFY. PG?bdGnM l4� � . � HAMNGSI'ECFI('ATqNS �. � .
waxo� ,wraox.�nrt N naaa vi � a„�rt . � L6 � - � � CONCEPfWIlAND5G1PEPlAN . . .
. SPRINKLER . . . . . ' �au µa nr.nnr. . rfw x..� �ec awwn: . . Ld ' ' (%INCEPfWLL WASC4PEElEVATqNS . . . -
. . .00 OOIfID fN0 (q1NWTON RYMI 0.tMU00 � '
YES . � � m o r� .��.ss uwaxun oi aiwiAr iu ToTPLSHEEfs: . t1
. . BLKO &OCxWC (IJODJ' �I .lOOi. iFEi Rlfi. SAfRMS) . � ' � Z W
BY .BF�u . fIC. f00MC X�fW. . NEIWW[v1G. N
PARKING � � � �aaw,arx.a c� wucc � . . cao acaw+m . . . . . . . . . �.
� . � eor em�a � . cew � w�vuua(o; ao � xnm re[ww . . . . . � F- N
PARKING SPACES 120 eaxc �eum.c � creao . crosuu eaAO sccr. ucna � .� �
orw+ au+ccx w: �wuaw cave snr snr�r PLUMBING FIXTURE INFORMATION .
HANDICAPSPACESS. cexv cu+rci �u. y�ux
MOTORCYCLE SPACE 5. e � c:m"`x w.� "„�' i �""'� 5p° `"" ��
n za.0 gur. ��nxc � � 3.
u conma.iaxr .o voco•u[¢A ' c [cxicn�w(e1 JENSFNPREGSTY.5WGALlONI80ALLOWA&EUNR51 , . .� �J
BICYCLE SPACES 7� � � a cc.�eawu ns� w nc« sr �sa.ac roar ( rtcr) � � ' �. Z ��� �
4C tELNG dy +ERf 55 51.1NLE55 SIEE � �Q �
� ca cau�x r r. so survouro FIXfURETYPE �tt. UWTS� TOTALUWfS ).
c.0 cwcxcrz u•saxr �H i :s sr sn srtEi � - � O
TOTAL PARKING SPACES 129 � ca+r. acaea ��n. irm six�c vIPUCNR4 =
' c0una Cawmruna1 AX YnnYUY' .isrcYO[o 1qPBA5N '1 JUWT$ J w J
� cw�. cauwas �� ur.au� uwvir ta.w: � �ar a r.saxrtr ' ' WAIERCLOSEf ' - 8' � BUNRS ' � 76. . . . W —� �'
CI [ERw�t RE fBEf.80�vD t 0.5. ttIP UF s�quCNAE (S1Efl) . � Z LL N�
�Cn. YEO�NPCK ' Itt.' i1PKK . W. Q���'
REOUIRED PARKING � � � �, p�' � a� �«.. �urxr,cwa xc o.x. urucss onrtx�nsc umm SFYC � 1 � z UWB � � a � U'
CIN OF TEMECULA ORDINANCE osc asa�xsu �m yyyi(�CNREP K � ��� �
w m�m w uwrau �xr. �nw . U(WNWGFOUNTAW 4 IUTAfS t � F �U'o�
344 FIXED SEATS TOTAU3 = 115 � - � �s oor�+�ssar �io . �iscEUµcas �r . �cair. �r¢�o ' ; � � w � . �
. . . . ovc nx.a � � ' . u�sarr aa[wxc' � imG iwtxmrtmuc TOTAI . 59 . . _ � �
THIS PRQIECT SHALL CAMPLY WIT}i TF1E FOl10WING CODES: a iv) �`v.� n` ' wc xoi a car�mnc� ," ,��� a � � O U �
• 2007 CALIFORNW BUILDING CODE (CBC�! 20061NTERNATIONAL BUILDWG ai. n o� m��a '� ���� ' �{ � o m .
�asi.(q �nwc a tlrzn � ��rtnsnrzxrx F ' Z��E�
CODE (1BC) , � w ao ux W.� w. ica +uom�.ua r.exc � ' � Yr � rar vmHrs ao"� 4 . F Y ior
• 2007 CALffORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC)12006 UNIFORM MECHANICAL °H ° �`""`" D p �
CADE(UMC) GENERALNOTES � SITE c � d
• 2(107 CALIFORNW PLUMBWG CODE (CPC) I Z006 UWFORM PLUMBING =„ � � a
CODE (UPC) 1. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS WILL BE STORED AND OR USED WITHIN THE � a �' w�,�
• 20W CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CbDE (CEC) I 2005 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BUILDINCa WHICH EXCEED TNE QUANTITIES LJSTED IN UBC TABLES 3-0 AND 3-E
E CODE (NEC) SITE NOTES � � �
^ • 2007 CALIFORNIA FlRE CODE (CFC) / 2006 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE �r� � ��
(IFC) � 7. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL NOT EXCEED A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 15 FEET � � �
� 2005 BU0.DING ENERGY EFFIGENCY STANDARDS `
AND BE ARRANGED AND SHIELDED TO PREVENT GLARE OR REFLECTION ONTO
� ADJACENT PROPERTIES OR RIGHT-0E-WAYS. ei VICINITY MAR
T-t HTB.
� T_�.p
�\� /� . / / I' �: ' :.:. . / \ �+e' / / / i \ \ JECTDATATABLE � . ' GHAF'HIC SCAIE � .
- �� i � � �� / ` / \ M � amir.rf«.wu.m �
./�/ , ' 4 � j-� i � \ . . • �orm.�
\ .!' , ' �, f ..�o�� � m ,.
��, i ,mK�...�. �.
��� � PP� / /i' / �/ � .. �� \ . mr..��. o. . . . Y�� �ar�ara � H
� , .W�. ,�� e �.' � �� � �� .o, . . �e. . . r
�p1 ,�=' � X\ � � \. � \ \ t . � SITE
o � , � � ` /T' � i 'y�: � � 1�� V � � ,,,a�"" � � � � ��.�r.. .m., � � . � _ wonu . .
. � � .� i, '' � . 1 ' �. � . \ . . . � . . . . .� . . � `
� �- ` . . ' \ � � � .�c. , . . , � Hcwrrv wv
\�� /� �Y��� 'E. 1 �. ' usw� . . no�y �. � 2� . . .
\ �vw� . ( Z { ..; �. \ w..cu w.cn�a�m . m , � . .
. . `\ w '� / T " . ` �\ � \ 4 . y � . u �PVUwxomK6<KMI ' .
4 �y ✓,VwxJ W W GeY�I'
, •MB � ° , � �+ " � � o VICINITYMAP-N.T.S:
.,\ / j��r+.� �, . �: \ :�� �� �,', lo�.:.w�".�i�u...nw �e�ew�. �
. �' . ,,,�, � ..... � ,� -;'� � � �. n..a�..,�:�.�» ,..c�« �
.� �'' m ' F\` , f .:, ' : /'�:'� � . . �' . \ ..\ ea� wiw . - .
\ r��� 1 � � � M1 & 1 1 � \ �� + ruaev6�ma� „� a�.a0a coW�boum�up.2q' ,�e . . . . .
` '�\\� O ry � '`` `` � / \ �\'\ . .
\ Q h \ �� � � > t .� \ �
. ,1 ? � 1 _�� � . . .
i �� � \` ��` I , jr..rilww.o � � .,� \�•` w.n .u�aow.aw.w.iExmi�x� .�.o�. . . .
1 \ �
' u
; ;\` \\ 'l �\ \� .. � ..� '' tl 6 :� \ � w ♦./ �
�) \ D \ 1
� ` 1,� .I: � ` YI �` k'. '� • p . a p '���•• . �in.m�
� \` �\ �\\ �I \ � \ �`;' u,+, 6 D � � �g �\, '� . .
�� � ��, �� a i \`` ,., �" - .m'.'° ` �� �� �� � ��\
� �" . n
,\, \\ `;�� G��\ � \ \ � � � : : . � �'� �,ro,u,E "'°""
` d � �
� ` ,�� �y\ �� � � � � �•\
�, �� ;� "N' �- `� i i �� � * , \'� � � � •�, /
'� �` �,` � a � ` ��` � i » . i � � \ �.\ :\� � /
� � P � Y/^� � � � - .1� �.o.� �...,nm
�� �� ��L �,\ � � � \� ` 9 � a..�..r \ `��� .
� .��! \ � �� � ` e s .�,.Kn•` ��.� '� — .
� � '��� ��� � i � `� ` � . � . u �������; >�,. ` �.,�""" , .
i
. , \`\ ,�� . i�s v i � �� �t� �; ° + ' � e e� . \\ \ . � 4 ���\� �. sw.u�s�rna n.aw�
. ��` � � � �` � a '� 0 3 � � � tA � � � � �
. . ��.� �/ � � � � ao-acrtxrc«e,sw . . � �� �� �.��
�•`�� \ � � � . .h °� a° � \
`` , 1 \ \ 1 � ` ` _ ° — .s \� \ .
\
c ,� . � . . � . � r y s �� \ � �P �
\ \ U
� �,. ,,, � , ,, ,, �, � � � � � �.. m 30
,,,, ,�� � , ,� �. l I �� �.
, ,, , , � . . . . �, .o , � �„
'\ \ .�\ G � \ \ � � � �r w� . �\.\. �. \ N
,\.\�` �\ �, '�' ��\ \ � ;� . PARCEL2 � �. �. \ • � �
�
� . � �� `r �qy � ; L ``�� � \ a � \ � \, �� :�� �� 232AC.NET 1 �, \ ��
� � ` �\ � � � \ �, � 23. �\ `
\ � \ w.uoa.w� � , Nt��l. ` . .� M ��� • � .
. � ,� , � �� � a o . . �✓20.81' .. \ ,. .
. � . . �� �v i� � � a , \ h . . . y � � d .
` i , ���, r� \ . . �� �'�,+ ' ` ° � ' 1 � � . �� .�a. .
, � �� ,\\ ° ..s.,,. :�.�:: . . ��'� �:':.. :"'�1�*.�'w.���.w •. ;;; :�.. II 'o; . `� �
� �� �; � '� � „.�..,a � CALLE GIRASOL ,-a� � _ � a� Q � w m �� .
�' xisr 12" RCB
''�`, 1`�� , �� ` — _ . .�„� �_t�nns; e" s iCEL WA r�a�E — — — — — — — — exisrwc.ie• wnrEa uNC �x,�° — I =� — — �i — — — —
,�
•\� �. -- [ N89"27'2a'W ] 550.64` [ 550.48.] - . � �¢°. � .
♦ ♦ � '�UN II _�
' � � �84. . .
. . � I
� .. . u
' � � � ___./�L=_________1/f._________ _1/L___-____ BM - � s �/� ,�'��- �- . ' �`-°��`�F°°. �°�°°°_ � � .
•.�•. ��' _. �____=__�'__'___'___'____"_'__'__-__°'____ _� ______ _____ ��__—� o=� . ' .. FH � V
. �, -- '
� ___I�L_����� __ ______________ . . .
. � .�_ _______________________ i �_ ____ . .
r�
.- �' -__ _ ` I n
�, �, --- �- -------'----------------- C . � J _
_ ______ � � a
_ o�� '
-� ------- .-l"" ;.; a, � � � . � � -- —=--- - ------
-- -- --------
- — � �. — ------
F — — ""`a"-,.. . - `"s�" . � . OWNER: APPUCANT: . �.. s n�e e T � .
' . um.amraa�c..pya�.n+ruwmu..s - -0AUFORNIAREGIONAL �SIT E�PLAN�
" — -- �r�"'�"t�e��. ��u�re�.ea �BUILOING�GROUPNo.4��.� �KwcooMw�uoF.i��wv�ursrnrr�sses S1.O� � �
�. . . y `';::1�� . h � r.mada,w . (951)928-4827 � s,e.acu�aiuso� . .
� nona�w � Z . . ��� ��M-q/J�f.MW . � . . reueCluACnmoi a�_src
�. a�m� a.ern � .. �YBG � � MI� � R.C.E No . . . � � naru ru r � .
�qi � � a 5 �
� R' E. V I 5 I 0 N 5 O�iC ry. I'. ]0' ait� u
�
' �-------
,n �,J _--____�,- � .:,.`... ����` i — "•"'rq . ro�va,cs /
l �n, .'�_�" _ �� ..'�Y� .
� �i ' ' " .� ,T=` � r � ,;'i '— _ _ R. ^ ��'� / .
�
\. � �� � C�\ � - �' � / � � — _ �awws ao�
`\ � \ � ` � ' _- c' - , � ,�
�� � � C � o _ — � � m.su
,\� `�� `� t P � \\` , , � w � �' � 2°2 53 . / / ��^� �\ s«„ � � �
. . � '�. , \ � i-- ' "� A� no � ' -: ' \ ncwi s�ur � 3 � � �
. \. � } a"I " ) � � .�1 } -' ='" ,,,. � �.�.�� - \ . �+ a
� + � . F\� .. . \y 5'41, , `�.� �� ueR L � � . .
i� ♦ ' 1 � '. O. V 1 6 . .. � � \ . . . .
� ,` �\:�E `� �' � � " �+"� .:`" " � s , o,� �,`� , � �� — PREPARED BY.•
- ` � \ ///��� ���/° (� �' � ;'� � � .r,g
:, , .
, , : -£:.: � �� =- , _ ,� , ,� ,. \ n A W
1 .� �k�{� ../ '�1... �. ,� a�� � m�,_
� � . �� 1 a Q ,; `L�% , � � . 1 �..�.+o�-.-.....
o> . � � � q � � ?� �� � ENGINEERING
j� \ �•�B ui � � `� u �� Q - e 'c29" �o c � � e � �.�,. ` � \ y `� \� w�...wc � .
�
\ �
, � � �
�.`\ \\ �\\ \ , ,�� \ R � .�► . �\\ ��
y� . 4�.G
� \ \� �� �`� V .�� ` s� � �\\ \\ \ E SiWG CW W ' ( 00) ____ R i1N5H ROOR
�( \ 'I��" ' y� �\ \\ — OVOSED CON W� ELEV ON
� \ \� \ �i� ,`. . .b � ?� .�\\. \� \ E STNC FlF ON '.'I0050). GG fINSH 4RWNp
. � �\ \\\ � . � � � ��� � . " W G `� ��\\ �` � _ _ SNEO'Et2 ION. 0 50 f5 fIN91 :UNGACE � .
\ a � \ � / `` ` \` DRUN�GE SW4E+-._ . � �B CNML BREAK
..�, � 2 �M1 ` ..\'\� PR01`CRttLINE� ' P 4Y CAF�GEFLOIXt
. ik \ � � � \`\ . \ �� .• � � \S . S\ y. \ � 1 \\ � RfHi OI (RM')'� p D RNISH .
�J�_ \ \ `, \\\ \ , ;, � Y� ^� �� . \ � \. \\ F%IST B�_SEMEP LLVE SB _ V LLLV nON . .
\ \ I� � . 1 '�. \ \ \ E%�Si wAifF uNE -- PUNIER Ntl.1 � �
�. \ `\ \ . O ` � ... �� /� �\ . � 1\. �\ \� _ RE'tNN��tw �_ —. � f�SE EN 141tt .
�. � � y: '¢� 1 �� � , �` SCRFF / R�E L �� 'iC �iOP Of' WRB
. V � • � . \ � � \` \ ,` . :\ ; / 1 . 1 \ � . _ R00! DR COiw[Ci W D � - LA�wJ'L .
1 \ -� � � . � `�, \� �` � i ��.o. �. \ ` . �� i car�re vws� . �: . �n . . ire ar w�i� .
� 4 ` 1�
� ��
� � \ �'� \� � � � ..�� ���� � ��� i � � ° l � � � � �� �� . ar ire o voonnc .
' �" \ � 1 �` �` \ \ � � '__ "� .�_'__ � t \ `)` � \ . ' no�s nonwo�sar
�,�',' � ��C�\. �` `� �'� � � ,;\ �- �° y t �."' "s ; ` . \ — — : � � eoiiou9
�` � � a ``� \ �H eo- uenea w.oe
` •,,I �\ � \� � ` �` __ _ ' �./� ., y � �i t c �` \\ . . . ,
''\'� •.� �\, \ f `` A �`��;�\.� � � �'!�t' �\ i S � �; � �� o ��`` �
.,\ ` ( - y�� \ \ � i1 , . a \ . � ` ` � .` : -$`` ` `'=` _` � ` \ . a �'�' �
� / €' -- ` _ c � � �... i
\ l�� \ '• d� e �6 " -- "'� ' "••. � � � � - � .,b . " � �rn.�.n�. � I �
. . �\ � � �� �\\ � \ ls. a� � '.,y, �.� �a.m ,. • .mu.n +� � �
\`
� \ \ ', � � \ \ \ h , I� � y � � � _ s`� ty -' _ 4 � 2x � . . �rvuuaau �m�a sr.ue �°;a .oum.ao. \. . I � .
� � � � :' �hON P ` � 2 m. "�'��� •,a _ '� --- - _ .�,��, \` i .� . )e �� � .
� ' E � ` �3 � `� ' � : �w -- "so-axxart� . � �w;� �`� � ''a °
� . � 7 � r 4/ � -- - — _s �.� �,� � `�n �\\ i
�` � \� .\ �- V n s.. ti � -- --- �i� � � \-�_ ` a l ; 3�
�', '�'t��« < 2 �M „ � �w �oz ��� � �� `., `� �, i
\, )�'�, Y p � , ` s PARCEI - n°`' 9`�'• - \�\ `�o rw,L-� ` `'�\� �a i
. \\�\'.;� '� �, � \, \ \�� __ _ _ �- .Ie - 232 C.NET L ,�:,� � . �� � �.�;^\ ' `
/ \\ � � '� _.�' t - - � � ' � ' bi ; _ 9 �� \���, 1 \ � `p M.\
•\ ', ', Y . � \Bi \ .us �if � - I - --` c - � tA � \ ``\~ .� \
�� £ �: � .e e , � � � ' . �i ��--� ��\
nu -
. �
.
. . . . � � �,�,, . �� � � � i� .i ' � � _ .\ � .
.
.
`��� - _ �I�
„ , - - '7'
. . . �., ,� :',, �`\ \y . ` N _ a, , _ - ---- - -- - r u..so, - - - - - asr�. � � , � / `J o.8� -
. �_ . _ � _ . J �
� ; �
, `� .... . . ' ,
" ' ' . � I
�t �
. . � ;�\� ���\� . ' -'_" �N89"27'24'W 46 _—____ __ d� f """' ra' _�>-�-`� - �4 -i�__"' 't"\""' �
� ' � _'. _ ��
.� �
o� � �
9.26' c.
� 1 ,, :� �� \ .
"_ �.
i ' :', � '�� ���� iie ------ _--�-. ..- '�- - - - - l � _ ._.._ ._..�._..�._._.._)
� � ` � `� -- � -1 - i T
` ��� '',1 ��. i' ��. .�.�` '\��_ '�.��� � . � _L'1/L-- _��,y"���� om _- . -"''� N W� �sT. i2 ,
•�, \ � �\ _ � _ ��-_ XISTINC STECL WAiEN �NE_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ;- '''-± _ EYISIINC 16� WAiER lWE _ y �=� _ � �� ', �
. GRAPHIC SCA ! - I — — =� — — — �
�, ---___1194--- ��� — _ _ — _ [ N 47724'W ) 550.6d [ 550.48, � ' � �. � �°—�-�.-7—�� �i
, , _
�U
N
a • a o • � �� �
• . � . �
I p rm 1 '\ '� �- �^ - ' �' - ° ___ �__-_...a. - ..e ""' _ _
W __
� r� . m �n +� `.� ��, ' JIL__" _"' _ ' '__'___" '_______"__"_ ___' '" '"______ '" " _____"'_'___ ' '_ - .�_ - � " - • _ ' _' __ ....'"" `'___ '
___. ["" " j/
� /
. � M �•
Oaa/�at .. -_ ...._..."""" """""""""""""""""""""'""'"""""" 16�.�„"."'"= , � V . .
- Jl!
-.� _� ,_ r..
_ �'•
' \ '.. ___'___!/L_"-"_ _" � "' " _ ' - "'"_""_" __'________''__________"_____ I '. .
/ --iiar� . il� _ . � _ . �� .�1�.,
- �- ;
rmem �+�n �w. a aror. �maw ---- - ---- --------------------- - -- �
,., -----------
--------
_ ..__,�_•-........._-•-.._..-•. --
tl7llthWbTS�W.G ��� .�.'_'.--._.._.._..___"_.'_.._.._..___.._. . ..___..-.._'._.._.'_.._.._.._.._.. . .'___..___ __ � - .
�
, •
__ .
, � ••
'___"___.._.._.._____" . .
�•.
�"
�
��
„_.,,___ . I n�
,. =
-` '_, _--'__ .
» �
,�" " . : , � �: .
.:
� ------- . __-- .. z � .
L�� .. ��EXl�T�2�_6"PVC .:-_-_-:.
w.a�.wswos - � :�.`:`�': ! - 6 �
. . F ' CONSiR�Ci10x KCORO " ?�i Br ' PEV�SIDIS' �lt WiE Y[N[N nMK '#nl. �bsYyre B� D�e.n By ' 6rckeC. �v . . . . ha�Yq xa .
R YnIE ,� h�N [IECK[D YY. Cm QF � p[PMiMENi'Of VUBLIC VONKS . .
� f v swa.wse„ or xemwexoeo a �
�� - an� ,.cccrrco en Y c— ROUCaI PLAN AND PLOT PLAN G-1.
� �: � �� %o� �.ed ��. �o.. �,.: �,� � .�.� �.. � p,�,��.�,,,�,m,�
..�. � . ���
. i; a.«. � _,u,� ?eccw. �u�vn� , , �� 2 .
5
KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES
31640 CALLE GIRASOL.
TEMCCULA, CNUFORNIA
GRADING NO7E5� � � . . - � � � � � � �
, , fLL GFApNC RvD PEUiED 4C11NP6�91iLL CONfOFM i0 T2 � . . . � . .
GRM'�NG. tF090N'h YONEMI Cp1�q0. OXU'�H�NCE N0. M ' . ' �
� -W. NN If� .
� fvaiue�, io��c sr<s wcrza rtcswaas ccMma��oou+c xvecs � . . . . � . � . . � . . .
CENEN�L�GERMiT fOP CONSIRUCilp1 ICnH11E5. 1 VMES ' Y� n . ( ��91fi1CIE� . . .
' -__-__-_1__________�______________ � pCCE49' .
.]. BUM1GNC vAD NO OF�N�4£ SW/.lE YOVES SHALL BE � �it�MUY Of � I � � �
'1; � pXNN�(i fl'HES 9�41 8E � ut,4u�u U O.I' Uftl� u1U bL � � I � � I . � . �
Cd15ivVCiEp � u�,m�U� O�.Y ����v iRW n¢ roP a w+oco .ico[s. i I Pfl0V09ED1-IAPRDVEMEM I I Y� �r � .
itM�SN GIApE 9�qLL YOM AMAV fqW Ni CM1ENdt WNLS �i XOf 1E55 � I � 1 � w � . .
� n�u� ip' vcn roor raa�e Mw��vuu a� rtcr. � � J - ; i
r
J M4%�YUM CUT ANO i1LL 4LOGE4 91ALL B[ 2.t. � +. I � i ��� 1 OPYWY �� �. �� . �.
� MONOE. n5 MPUC�1BlE. CQ:CNEIE &10'N pTCH[S OE50lFD i0 1 __ �-�' � !� __ __
1 r }...' "/ _
CONVEY 100-YEM SLCHy RAWS 011 vRONOE GR�OFD BENUi �IONG iXE � MRd1p I "S ,�.�.�7_�= -- ---'-
rav or �u, cn.ocn vavES ovrn r i� ecanru Nnart an ni•r.wc i � xve f r�vea�ww � �.______________y' U - .
MJACENi t0 Gi��E� �AE�S i0�01qECi SUFG�CE FUNOR �WIV fRp,l � � ��� , _
T1C i0G M SLOPES. -
�
:f. All AAMNG.SH.u.� BF. OONF uNOfF iXI 9��OEMN3'.M (K ♦ NOTNEBqI Cq0888ECT10H_(0)M1941EI1VENUE�TPMNINOLOT ' ' �
NEGSLEPED CiN� ENpNfEA, SOi� ENWr�EER, OP EHGHEEAiHO OEO�OGSi � � '
wn(I�SMNL f.EFMY Ln �l FiLlS hA�f PF�u 4FCiFRI.Y Pi.Af.fll AND� � ' .
MHO SIIN.I SI�BWi A iIN�L�COUP�LTM HFPMT f(% �i I. ��11,5 ffVFR' I' RE8IRIGTEO . � �
occr. , , ,�cceea ��
� G.� • RCGSiCkCD GNL CNC'NCCA S1�LL SUOML i0 il�C LIY 0� I V �� -- ����� � ���� . . �------ S . �� ' . . . ` � . . . . � . . .
�----- r------- �------
. tdcau's rueuc woaKS ornwrrcHt . x+rrzH crnrnc�icH or � i vaovoseo-+w�vaw�rtt � ��- ___
cawr.�iw u' xaua w•oxc w nccwuu�cE wiH inc n�vxuu�o � �.� i. � j v . . a �„� R c a rvc c � � .
ror
. caen�HC au� rwc� io ss�u+tt or n c au�n�+c r[au i � i � � -. � � �
cc i� rw sn�LL uc io uxc. a� - u��uun� u,o ia•iw nr f : �. i . �� � �-: .'' . i � .
CU�/V 40PE5. � * w. I vuns �
� I / �'� � MCBERN� �I �RPoONT I. I � I �� 1 Y_ �` .
ro . v��ip
�) 1 N. COMPACION PlPqt�� N.LL BE NEWNE� i0N ML f LLS fAL�IEa �' ._... -2 i___"_ _ �I 6MLtV I � I I rr 4�. M1mn Ci[vo.f t- ` `L��' �_-_ -�
.mura[ root. - i � -- '_"l��., �, _.
� , r �w� i i
8. �LL'LRAOWG 9f41 BE COIIE N CIXIFORN.WCE �lih '.� / �« �, ��yP�wp �� ` � � � s � �' -�.
RELW4fNpAI�.WS Of IME Pr1F11Y�NAP� 50'.LS W4t511G�11GY Bx ----
OaIED M1V SEiS CF ME �I aw rs
IWN CU4FACtION FiYLWI SFNL tlE'JltlMlliFll 10 IFl WFYIC NIX1N5 �
DEPNIIyFHi Mn.d Sn�LL m(YUh[ fWnDand CESG�v IIECWw[ND�np�S '. CMOSSSEClIp11i1blOPMLEPTOF - m
U fFRlifiC�IiON IXAt CA.UNNG N�5 BEEN OqIE lu COx�piu�NQ M�M �\ H�1NEbqL GiQ435ECTONfC1AlIG5E�VENUE�TBUIDIlq � '
ME RECO4MENO�iIC�v5�0f ME FftELiutxiRY SqLS REPOqI. . NE%TTOdiEEN °
9. THE CONiRaCTOR SnnLL NGT�fY iHE PI184C WOftKS DEP.VtM�Ni nl - NOTE: � �� �
lE�Si 1B�Xq:N51N MV�NC! FEWESIING LINISH LO! W�OL �xp . a p
'ORAIrvAGE�iNSPECnCN. � iM5 INSPECPON uVSi BE MPROVFD PRIIXt i0 � x0 m�saxc er'u�[x pr mE �uPoS n �
BUiID�NC PERMII CIFAX�NCE 1'OP E�CH L01. VWl1C MONRS OE�Mt14ENI � � p.
. PHONE: (951) fi9�-61ti. ' ' . . . . . . .
�0. CUi /.ND FlLL SLO�ES sNALL BE 1'ROiEC1E� N1iM � LOUB�N�iIOx Of �
�EFOSIW ANO SED'�NENT CON1R0�5 i0 PpOiECi, ME AOPE� fHpl ER050n ' �
AND INSlABILITY DIIRING iHE fFA�INC PX/.SE.
�tt. POSi-GR�CING /.CTNPES SH�u INCW�E. BUi n0i BE 4uliEp tC. ' ' '
' iNSIAWNC, NHEFE .WY�CNiLL, .MOUN�COYtiM, INElS. SNNUbS. Wi .1 0.ESlIi1ClED � +
COw&r:�nq� MEREOi irv nLCIXVO.wCE vnM Oh CWES MiOR t0 TnE. 4 / �
♦PPROVI.L�fFlNKWSPECIIW.'YOPESOVEN�'iNVCxTW.MF10�1 ;_�J_______ 1/� �
SnALL'nnVE PEPU.WEVI YtRiLAli9w SYSIEUS NIH BACK�LOM VNl�ENllpl I 1 � �
OENCES PER Mf U.P.0 � ••� ••� •.•••i• f ; ,
I 1 ' ...w�. . I � .e.�� '
12�f1u ��1ERiw Sn.ui HOi BE PV�CED W EnSnuG GRWNp �Hn� L��fE ' '
CiWN� FAS 9EFU QEAREO 0� KEDS �EBN�S �OVSq4 µ�� OI�9 y' �' I
OEtElflUWS if SR2F.S:OPWG iERP��.N OCNR$ UPOU MYCM �""' .:'• � _� - 1
� - vu� �s w � v�.ao. �hc �cxx.w ��s� ec ar..unu. et.en. um ,.••.•. - _. f � _ . . . r ,. .
B PPPOH PLACEYENi OfuGiLL. SpL fqt NLL LIPPORi. h REPSiEFED ,� �_. -__ .SF N4% �� .Sx NA% I-N �� � J�.�� / ua Rvc[
ON� kNGYEW. SIX� fHONiEi. OP lNONEEP'�NG fE0.DO51 SnK� ! �+ y
�.1J, tENP05MT.qiAwACE Snui BE PRO'npED UN11L PEAUAnEMt Oft�w.'nGE ��SSEC1pNU)GLLEGIRFSOLEI15T90EOFPROJEGT �� - -7`
� SiNYC1URE5 �FE Msi�LLEfl. VftalEC�M uG91xE5 J�ALL bL �� � fm �` ��� K �
IMPLEMFNIFD i0 PHOLECt MJpNW4 Ax0 OOYMSIREN� PROPEPlES �RW NEbTitlCTED '
SiL� UFYOSIIiq! �NO �GSiNC v�ilH WHINC WiWINC OYEN�110N5. K � E � � �� �
�'
zm��rks�n_a-r.�r?er,esrs � _ _ `•..�'
' ' . � �1' I 1410RI�S�Q:TIAI.CGLI.A�'TOR(.I.r�NE411NDIVIDEDII��*f'� ' .
. F __,__�__-, .
�. f,p1CqF1E PANNG uN�i5.5NA« BE .l I/P" IM�f.K ON A J" LAVFR Cf � � --- �MjlUNl3ktilfl'IEHITYYL'Afi � �
S�NU OKR I]' Gt�VCL (i i/] t0 ]') iv 9ZC. OvER CANP�CiCO N.1NP�L I I ENIST Ni '� . -
Sql.. . �I I SIDEWMI( � � 'aw . .2�1C1)AIMPJlC9AI:UNIVXWAYAWNGAC'N' . , . . .
E
. . I. . � � � .14C&09SOVff611-TIYlCALS[CfIGN . . . ..
' I I� � � +��'IIRBTNqNY1T1UN � ' '
4•,.�ECOIZATNE I I�CUR864MER � IJL I 11'.flIGNTI ' . Y7.9ASPIIAI.TCGNCNLft2Uli:L4, ' ..
PAlIOURAIN�ND$�yl� � � - - �� ���
OR�EOUAL IN , � , . �:c . � g ��
LANOSCAPE AREA: . _ '� ��. f. rucvnvlMO . 9V . .
UOSSbE , '�1 . O ����D��Y '
; � .
� . � r .n"L"0� . . � . . .
4 URAIN PIPE'AT 12 MIN. . . . . �-- o+w- �- - a �,���' . . . . � . ' �. . . .
z DRAIN DETAfL LAND.4CAPE AREA ' :� u,r-
[ CdSfRU[iIW 4E[WO i B� R[VISIU4 SCnIC �U . Dry�nW BY' ' q.i.ry CHFtrF� Bn . C� QF � OEPPiiKNT � WBLIC VORNS o- � .
�
� � h P e uwe � Oi RCC6Y.YNOCD BY �nTE � � �' -�
9 y,��v _ on� �.ae . ..per.san KC[ni[G B r. ., C,RADWCi CFiO� SECiT�ONS
g. n� �� :�,.. >g �� m Q w .,� .,�,,,�.,. � iu/ooa� w�u oF,eaw,urs wn� �
. . . �sn uue a�m� . �
. . cci. Ho. - iaecuw c.uranM :„�.< y or p .
� •
s�•a
� a . p
. . . . . . �5 � . ec - eo - ec e� et ea ra ��•a I . . . . .
"a -- -- -- j — � . . . -
s . g F _R . . � .
.. . � P: � — i / i �� a ��)� o a 5 � ..
- r �/ li tF :�r
!� H 9
oe ' SS[ � z `I
� �
� a - a,, 4
� � '•a ' . m - .
'� 5 k ` 1 ��'° .
r � :. K `��
A. � f ,
,.,
�
-.# " a �� g � .4 .
'.��� ... �8
� � -�� � 4
�
.g � �.�,
�Q� N
�%
4 €
--- -iaa k � � .
~ � �� A
.� �.� �F
a= 4 _
-:� y
' . � sc -_ R' �s .
- � g
°a� ..'�?..., . 1 ira - t - r� i
� �sa � i�-`o � i i � .
. �� -- i�g a ' �� c 1
� 5d T —_' 3��_, : 1 4 ' . . .
r�=i 4
--- i i s i
. a� /�;� 1_+�_f �.� i i i�;�.i .
-- -- � r-7
s ' ¢ - --- `
� � --� � � � ---
� � 4 � ;a .s ; —_-�>-�•• ; a a
- . s 5 4� - '-i i - =:_�i�_F�" - � -----¢a� 5 il
7�i --- _ i -
I i r'r
9 ' ` � - - -€ �—a
- -- Y - ii - i `� l----- � �g$� .
- i i i i
50 T,F ---_'"�--'-- � LJ f 1 q' ' .
, q ��� o s i q
. . � $ 'S� � �l = I . .
- i .- 0 . - ��er �em iaa� i i i -
+-�- i
_ g =�'i�. i
q '," -
6'd' { e �
. A{J a�� �� .
y;� y ?�� x
•'� ��,
. . . � . .. tva �- �E q .
_ a
_ _ "t
r�,� �,� ��
ra �c
�
�
� � � ��a5$� �� � .
TY =:� a q
- � a �
r sAC �, � Q
4 a�o � � J :' ` �, � .
. . , ' . Q. . _ � . . .
� :� 4
. . , _� �$ y v yl �� �� ��� ' .
¢'_ f � �
. . � - � . ;� . ss . ea ea � ea ss aa � i ea e�a� �i -
ua I se•a
� t s�T: FLOOR PLAN
� '�� � � CAUFORNIA REGIONAL
1�♦ r�5£ �` wtaEC °�t BUILDWGGROUP. No.4 � �
� , v "a'"=� o� 31640CALLE.GIRASOL "�,s� »',e 95� 926-�827 - .
. O � � Temecula, CA 92¢91 � - � � . _
:�
:, ; , , ,, % ,, ,
,; : ; ; .. .. , , . ;, , , . i // / /,, �, .
� h ��
,,. • _: . , : .. , ,�,,�,,�,,% %;�, � •
� a 4
. . . '..���.-.. .. �.,�� ....,.:.� , . :.. . ,...� .:,.. . .;:� / ♦I/ �' ' � _
�/ b
f.nutt c � CONWMO-EWiOPE�xGrtLEnONE '
. B 7 . 8 ' . ' . J �
� � EAS4 ELEVATON . . . . . . . . - . . . . . Z� Z �
. � . .. . . . . . �?
Q'�� 0.'
Z�rn
..�o,w�a..u�.., , . . . . . . . i � � : ., i i , .� .� . _ i � Z �
. . .,
r
� � 1 � '�i - �i� � � � ��i,�r�� � � i � � , i . � � s.�e o LL p �
i r .. i i �i �i r .. �� � J J.i
. , . ..,. . . .. ..� � . . .. . , . .•
a-rw.c�ncan�ae . Q �
- Um
. ,..aEUnuccu �+c.e n.aNe � � wrw.eu.aaux�.nice.oMe . . , . . .um s�ouE ru...x:ww.
. �rciveu.e.eaeuerocco .
. . � Z WES�T ELEVATION u . � . . . . . . . . . . . ,y u, � .
� t
. . . . . ...��.�.E��.. . . � . . � . � 4 � „°',
x�Q�;e:: � �, � ..:����:::
�� `° �` ,:.�`:` ,. �" 4 4 z
. w� . . .. ....
.�,.: . . . . :
... . : �
.. . . . ,.
. . . . ...
., ;_
... _ . . . , . _. _
, _ ...._.. ..,:.r
.._ _ .. � . ::...:: . .. . . ......: . . �.: : _ .�.
, :... .� . . `.
: . ..: : .. �:.,...
...
,: .. . ....
.:: . 9 e �
.... .. . ....�...':. .� : . .. '.... •.... �., ".. . . e b ' . . � . �
N
' � euaxrwew .��rcMmw oe . Q .
>
3 . FOUNDATION TO GRADE DETAIL , SOUTH ELEVATION 5 NORTH ELEVATON x O W �
- . . �v. �r . - H O�
Q LL(/1�
. . . . . . . � O�N
J N
W . �C��
QjQ .
. . . . . � : 0.' : I U �
� � ' � � � �� OU��
Op m_
� Y � H' .
� W U
� �
Y
� � - � C SECTION � CROSS SECTON � � 8 CROSS SECTION � � �
A-3.0
, GENERALNOTES
. ' . ' 1. Ml�%MUM dSTANCE TO TRAVEL TO E%R 200.
� � � � � � Y. NUNBER�OF FlRE FXTWGUISNERS PROVIDEO.
� . µj. MAIUMUM MEA Of SERVICE NLLOMED 7000
� � � � . - � . . S�Ff:pREpBFJNGSERVICEDBYEALMFIRE
. . . . . . . . . . . . E%TINGUISMER IS LE55 T/NN N00 SUFT. ANX
. . ' ' � ' DISTANCE OF 7RAVEL IS LESS 7HRN 75 Ff.
LIFE SAFETY PLAN LEGEND
• ��
� �MN(IMl1M PA7N OF TRAVEL TO E%R �
. . . . � . . . . , . . � i .'
. . . . . . � � . � . START FPiX OF.TRAVEL TO E%IT 4
]1'-i' . 1�,-2, � .
11'!' �1T-0" ]�'6 �6'.T 1TS �ISO 7rd - �WDICATESLOCA710NOFE%ITANDENO . J �
tga ia.r 16-0' . . . oF VATH OF TMVEI ' Q
b �.w.�o..� V.SI ix� ix�.� VSI _'__ �.4 r �M 4 �4 ��..�.�...,�.. _- �' '�' �' �'' �>.�..o> .� _ �P E%IT IDN^DAFTESLOCATONOFFJUTANDE%IT Q.Z
ye I `"_ "'` Ib . . . � a.�
4 IS �� Y � .,? � 1 i - � V r b � - � i � d d b d! 6 d b d�'/ §. �N
ro �" o � \� , j j/i` : _ _ .; �'���\� � M1 ✓ �� . I � � � �
\ .�: � � i ti � ` � t mwweceu � / //' \� \ \\ mxrwu+cee� A ' y. � }. � ti y�,. x /� ocrt�ccess Q � N .
4 � � � � .� �� \ � \ \ � \ . �\ / // 1�! � \ \ L . , j ..
b 1 �\���\��\���\���\ . �\� . ��� �...� ..0 / ��/ � � " . �\� �\� �.�., . , / � .. � ' �/��//� %/� �1�� / . .. 1b . .Z 01
.a.':� �\ �\.�\��.�\�.�\'.- \�.� / � � �. / /� � / // /� // // ��
�� •••• � � ' � �� ���. //:i/i /�.//��/� 1N• . FIREEXTINGUISNERGBWETIOGTWN �Z
I ��:� d E t S e: t a.' .� , i� ii ; �'X'�!'.� !�� ���. �,�� r.b o � � 0 8 t� I ��� O—�n
. m ��. t �� � �j,f . . ]\� \� j/ /y b � IXITSIGNLOCA710NANDDIRECTION .LL ��
� � ir.r� �\ / f - / : i5 --J � � . � . \ /,� � . 1z.r J _
4 a q ��oa � �"�ii�i/ijii� �s i .,,, l, ��` \\\�������" ii •i �� a� U m
� � m � :^ D \, ,�s� ,� r�,,��' �� . , � °� �� �� ��� ,. r � m
� � / �' i / � � \� / / Q �`� S 3 ppRTITION LEGEND
4 : I �. -- � 4 �\ '/ . . / . . ��/� I I � : 1.\� , � � ♦'. � ' ' � �/ i . � '/ '
b _ 1.� 1� I . �, r _ � . � 4 O' SMOKE PMTI710N (NON MTED�
� \�� r a 3 < r t/. / � / \ - \ � i/ ( e
\ 5 i 4 h i 4 i 1 J`� / /� �\ \ �� '� i 1 i 4 M i i i i�/
� I `�,\ � \\��\��\�. ��\\� 9 � \\�� / '// �� �'�, � � � I . \� \ / ��i , . i ���/.�'g'°n , ��% / ��%%� j � -- / ,( I . .
' b .' 1 1� . e . r�rlw na /// ; \ \ � Mffrlra aa ' u � � �Y I b . . . .
\• Lb; " �.K, �, ,✓ F ..�.�...,, i . +, � J %
{, p i = ' � � _ � i, 4
b I • ��\ n� " i i 9 : , : : i � _ I 4 a 4 tl 4� k y M 4� 4 h %� r I b . . . . .
� . . . ,
. . +'•z . � . ��� ' 4 !v i i H w�nme,naurE y 4 . i �v $ . . �ra . , z � N
y� 1 ------------------------- 1° � N - N
,r,. W .
, �p . s� �,a. �,+ � e , 3 . ��.�. . . . � 2 . F �
„-� „�.� g � .
�r-r w-r m.r � a . y . .
� - � . imn � . . . Q .
EX171NO 8 UFE SAFETY PLAN � � � � � - OCCUPANT LOAD CALCS � � � , p � �
� � . � . SPACE d'.QW�qf MWBFJIOF ' � = J
. . SVACEWWE� � MINBER � � lOAD ' � ARFA OCqW�NTS ' '� �
W LLv�j,- ,
' � ' � ' . H1pTOF4W A' 100 1 PEN SFAT 187 SFATS ' f7I LL �� n,
- . PlA1FqiM� ' ' 701' Y15NET 7/OSOFi ' 18 0' J��
CLOSET '103 1pWGftOS5S7SOFT 1 g
0.ANPA 10J V100GN0S$ AISOFT 1 ' �� Q + JU
� COfffEPENCEAI 7d u100CA0SS 715SOFf ' 3 ' ' . ' ' (�' � Q to.
MEElWG0.7 105 VINET N9SOfT 15 , . .. � Z� OU�'
' IOBBY F 106 L/0�GN055 A7 SOFi 1 . . . . � O m
� . . UMY 1W 7!lOUGROSSEIS�FT' 1 . . � x� ' Z � . m...
STIBUE . NN . 1NOOtl106S fA590FT . 2 . � � YtoH
MEKSPESIPOpA � 169. vt00CA0SS 19250F7 2 . U'
WOMENS flES1R00 - 710 ' 1J10DGROSS 201 SUFi 2�
' 6A9YCME � 1/1 . 1/10DGROSS'bS�FT t. . � ' � � .
70PMA10 � 712 � 1PENSEAT� 1K4SEAiS 171 �
� . . . %A7FOWIB� � 717'.1175NET '7105UFT. - tg� . . .
� aasET- �nt 1!laoGROSS 57SaR -� EXR REpUIREMEM CALCS 'cirr.owm .� 1. .�I i i f .
�
FPAIPB� � � 715 ll100CA055BIS�iT 1 � �
.' __..._......._ _:I....___......�....'.___ urti ,. G'w] �, an) � utrt� i� ' c�crto
. . CONFERENCEBt �HB' 7HroGNOSS175SUFT 2 � airuawrx�o . . . .
. . . . ' MEETING B7 . 117 1q NET 2/9 SOFi . 15 ' � 'q p �
� 'IOBBYB. .118 1HOOGROS367780Ff 7. rav�putuEO N1mua artua aaw cu�an ualM w,�tm �aw cu�att ua�x w�tm
. . COYEREDENIWMCE .WA' ' WA WA NfA � wlpxo um �muxm wait iwrFnPa �xc f�wr[�wa wae� nlrfawM MCK� Nr[www �
�. . . , TOTOLNUMBEROFOCCUPIWTS h8 0.6' EMOCCUPMR u � uo� u� n � uo� x .
' � , � :t1a1NIXCJi1.HM� � �.CY1tlTYWIfIU .INOi. . a �� O '
. ...
� ALLOWABIE AREAPER STORY 2f 000 bOFT __ � � � � � LS� � .O �
' �TYPEVCON87RUCTpN16RWPA1 _______J . .
. � " TYPE VOLiS WATTAGE �� LAMPS ' MOUNTING fl%NRE DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER� CATALOC N� 'NOiES�� $YMBOL
� (y x,r swr rao �a anv.a.mar cruaNan-n- . .
.. � . n ' w � xurv ttwYKttYMW S'-0'a!G ianus+.e[s ntn�t - �'❑
(L ew vs axe[ �c�o ta wYIaK ttar tm-LDaKVS-rn- •
. . . . . R " Ka qep,.�p q[N LLw,u�KW�IJ'-0"UG 19YA61H3. Y.lA�1 - �'�'Q
LIGHTING FIXTURE SGHEDULE 1
_ Nv� -
� P�I� , ,a
• ^ �` a. n n x }i ii o. ' . . .
P v:: �. as �. �� ri i,. ia �. STATISTICS Q
. . O�. r r� aa a� s.o i.. }.r i< a aa . . . �Wb� a ew M.. r.w Mornr� �.yr.un �.
. . Q 1.1' ]s 9.r ]� 1s ]u i.� 1.� ta y.i Gk2NMN1 +. J31c 11Ak tAk �11.l:1 3.�:1 .� O .
' 1 ' � ]p 7A �YP �td 2i L RE V . . . . . . � .
2t U� Y.� YA ].� -tI ]l L U !D 1� 2i 1 � '^
A � '
. . L . SA . >D ]� L !! Ea . ]w 1� . Y. � . . .
. . Zd Y 1i� 2� 29 i3 . 5a . ]] 5.� .20 . . � .
. . u v.0 ea sa s� r y. .o v �.e �.r x� - C n
v
��
, v ss v » an � io a.� ��e va v � �
za x� v, v • v�.e i. }. }.r . ' T
. n�. . � x u �e v ie ' a v v a. . . . . . . �
� . - . � u ss � v ia . ia . �za �.r �.
� ' � . i, 2s � v u i.r a� n � na v i9 . � . . � .
. .�� . , . + s v ie �a �., v xx �a . v . . . . �
. . . . ne ao u }.r �.a v � n x� u . as . . . . . �
. . z.e +�.� �r �.v s.r' . i.0 n.v is i.v n.. � . . . . . W .
. � � u. ii �� v i� n a. » v Ya i.e u �.
u a� v zr z. v a� s. u u a.�
<�.o ia v� .a v �.a an �x v . . x� s. � � u 2� �an u �
]3 ]] 46 1 1t.1 43 1G 1a 16 13 18 l.� ta ]A Se 1 tYa fe �3 lw l.l 1J l• 1! 20 SO lb
� 11 1! 1.> in 3] 2� 13 l.� t� 1] 1] tA 20 �.o L.t �A' 2i t.i l] t.t 1D lA 1.� le 1] 11 �3 te
1 1] f] I 1f � } ].i ].� Y.l lb } 2t t 1 1.] ZI !➢ t � � .
1 1 �.1 l] U i) >d Y] te 2� Y� �8 ) ].1 ib �D� �
\A ]J .
CALLE GIRASOL
� LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE 2
sEU - urr sEK -[xax[w 5 M E E T
" � CACIFORNIA REGIONAL BUILDING � � � CITY OF 7EMECUCA -
^ p�FSsp,,�
�� . ��„Ew.� . . COMMITfEE � . ancoa+ruuaF.��wv,ursx+tr�ESSes ' E�
fW
RecioN ae S/TE PHOTOMETR/C PLAN
. � , 2 . `" ° � �, wHCOOn� wui ov.��rovuis wirr�sses
�+ � v�x r � . a�_ s.¢rs -
o[sw lelV � � Cu� a . R C.E. Me. ' �o+m iu x. .. '
� � R E V 1 S�0 N 5 �� p a • 10 ' ' � .�OOY�Ml��IIp10 � "
PROJEC7` �
Calle Glrasol Kingdom Hall � � �
�a W��
TEMECULA cal,iFOnN� LANDSCAPE CONSTR UCTION DOCUMENTS 9 �� � a
�� gr.�
APPLICAIVT.• � � ° � °
Temecula Valley Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses ���� �
31640 Calle Girasol 3 ����
Temecula, CA 92591 � ' � �
��$�:
Contact: Joe vanHaaster � °.;�
951-662-9405
, SITE MAP LOCATION
� �� �
� � a
r e r ,, � 1 � g { Y
� ,, d � � As�. zA
i
. � .�� �,/�.� , . . .
, . `\ i% * ' . \ ' � 4�RRiFt, HO! SPRINGS . a �� . ' . . ' .
�S:
\' ' _ ` ' � ' � . .
� � ` � � sirE o ,
:.\ ,� _ �naa�s a°"° e y � •
� �
. . ;\ ` \ `�, `i � � ' � � � tlPA5
.�� 4 \ \ _ — wcwm nua ; �
. � , \ _ _ _ \ � . � N.7.9. W v � �' �
, �. \ �' a G „ g
° �, : � v � e ��. 3� c,' �.� . g a �.8
� d� � _ '__ _ . �� $ �. �.
��i `` _ °.° --- -_-- --- ---- .. � � VICININMAP-N.T.S. � � � �
. \''��..,,,�__--- _=_=- _��` —.�—,--� —�x �r...3
'_ ' c� ^':II ;�--- ----••--- .��.:�P�,.
� � n �� ��
N.T.S. - � � N.T.S. �
GENERALNOTES ' SHEETINDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION c:i�: w,�m,e
. �w u,.: waiv
1HE PUNT WTEANL6UiF1lER NI�'ON lAND6GPECANTRIGTOH 6WLLL f.a.n G�� W
' PROVWEOWJIANTEEOEVIOENCETOTMECRVIANUSCAPEWSPECTOPTHATKLPLANTWTERNL6 L-� COVERSHEET
- fAN91STENt 1MIN THE APPROVED PIANT LEGEND CONSIDERWG GENUS, SPEGES, CULINMS. ANO SQE � z�vac�v.:
- 6PECIFlED.N1PlANTWTERNLNOTCON5STEIRWTNTIEPUNTIEGENOWVfiEREIECTED. � L-Z PIANTINGPLAN
ALL REVISqNS MID CINNOE OIiDERS i0 TNE MPROVED IANOSUPE
ARCMITECTURAIPlAN9ANDbPECIFlCATqNSMESU6IECTTOTNENEVIEWIJ1pAPPffOV�LOFTNECRV . L-3 PLANTINGDETAILS - �
LANOSGPE MCNRECT BEFORE N!Y NONK MAY GONTWUE YWOR CHRN6E5 ME t0 SUBMTEO BY �
� iELEPNONEFAC6p4lETOTMELITVlANO6CAPEMCNREGTANOTHECRVlANOSCAPEINSPECTOR. L-�I PLANTINGSPECIFICATIONS
� � � � � CONTflACTORSHAILNOTIFYUNDENGflOUNDSERVICENERT�U3I�BEfONE .
. STMTOFCONSTtiUCTqNAT�lW�1]2J10].ANENCROACNNENTGERWT ' � L-S CONCEPTUALLANDSCAPEPIAN� �
� . IBREQUIFEDFOIIIVT�HOLINGTOVENIFYE%{STINGLOUTqNOFUTWTIFb. � L�S LANDSCAPEELEVATIONS � s"�°':
^ ALL YWRK BMML LOMPLV WRH THE CRY OF TEMECUTA STANDMp6 W0. UNOBCME OEVELOPNENT. �. �
. o. , � . . . . �
�
C nl: �
�
� ,
..�...d1Li.
aeeaaa ee�aaa0a0aa 0e 00000 � ,.::.::.�
.:.::,.,.....��,
:,_..:..,..., � �
mv�v�o ��������mm� ao ��e�� �-:,== �:=-,.� ���,
������ ����������0 �� ����� , ,��r� .::: �, : �
'' / ��� / �3 .
��l���i� 1�����o���� �� �9A�9 '� �-: ����� i i
IISIII Il�le���e�� I� 0��11 � ._ ���,e� ,�
� �. ,
II���� �10��a����� �� ����I �
��a��� a����a�a��� �a ����� ,; - :.�,�.... .;:,,��,
■oao■■ o0■monoaeao 00 . �"-.. �,..� � \ .,
', O � � !: "� �� � � ���
�' •.c+eoo•�oo.,o.� � '.:: � : � �o�����1
� �:. .
,,�� �,:,~ \�� ;q
,•, ` I ��.�=.
,�o ��:t9���1 i
�` �'s,�� �.:
� _ '� 4 y�����; ��►
�; I: �',.�����'� �
_ _ iti' le ��;,;, �, � � ���'�"L .
- '`;` ,,- �?'��������;� -
. o ��
, � � o
_ ; �, � ����b _
_ - . �? �` ti� '
�
- - - '' � I l ��� ='
_ _ - - , ��, ,� '
_ _ , � � /1.�
_ - ' ��
, I� .�.
� (�/'� � n e a°. � �+ ��• r � � ..
� � �• � �� aG �� ! � . 07iO�
a° � \ � �71
J :. Ai��' � J. . \ � ..�
° .I � �o� :
� . . ��
' �► \\�` f�
�� , �;o� .. ' ��;,! 4� ��� Y' � :
.
�; �,�o. ..�r` •,;o�• .�'',� \��`� � ►
�,,-, � , �- ,i � oo'. p •'- � ��`"� ��
:. � �c .. .� . Oo \��
� � � va � ",i.�'1 � � � \ �
%��. �c, e�.. � �:?.� ��O ���!
M 1�:�� I e,'°.� •�� q�9�r I.e��> f�►
� ����� � .:^' "�� ���° � ��
.,•r. r
� , c ,� ��
rl��.�
;, i, �! 4 � � I�,I f � , . , r,,��'"���
. �
�, , .
� � � ��'� �' � M `0.0 ��\ � •
e.
� '� � . ti.5.�.�i. \ �
� ��� • w � � � ���k �""�;, �1
���� Y � ,f `�S .��'` °o°O� �� 1r;¢ � h ����� 0 � O �'
��r � a� a � °o i���� ..�� ��� ��'�'�'i��i�� ��,,� �
'' *������ � y � �� �. �:�`}',���o � �� p' 9 �� "����
, � � 9� '�',GY��� ���� QII�w ..� � \ ` �
, ���',�=: �' a `����x �; .�, �`�'-.�,��',°�,� ���� � ��1
� ,� � . � '� �� �'� � . a � 1 � "�
, , �i`� o, �;,. ^,-�� � `� c � �` c `° `,
i R�j,`F�`F'• o 'c^ .[.� � a� " � ee -. � � �o � . �
� � � �. ♦O ' -�..�+.�e"' \. °°•� '^ \�?�� \� #R
�i��,�' � , x; . \ \ = 4�, °Y °� �� ��"� �.
•� � = 0 t� - � � ,'3 ��
/� • � ": �� y y.�v
i.,� V
�. ..^+,c � '
• . O
� S � � 1 .�j,,�' ��i:S'✓�
`� � � x: �! � �.
� a" �
4� ��� � , � � w
� � ,<.ew:� .,,o� `
po 9 ��t�C• � \ �s' �`Q�W eo/
<e? � ���\\\ � ��� � Q� � .
�„�: gG'� ����\. .'`�\\�\ Q\�py�u� -
� ����� \��. �� ,
,, ���. o. ..._r• - �\o\� ` \\\\\`.,,:,.. ,;;,
�, �n -�������q��>y� �',h'.
' p �g� . ' ° �s � ���\ �\�'��$.r�°�p'� i
, �����, C` F' � QN\\\ ��
p. ',,.. ����� y ���
�. ' a ��'"."`°,� �:�
, ���`` ,� �..�:..��\\�:+°�� � �" '
`�'!\\ ..�, �`���q��
. . �,�,�-,� e` �. o
�'��'��'�`�\ . ���s���? ;�,.�:
�� . Y O� P���,� a� �
_ � \\����� '
° ;rr �� 4� 4 � :.'
' , " �,
nni.w uw�n <wc« ne rnea ro er� nrrtwae vaaw rure �
. � RACE! NN. PFAeRff. -0LWilPhCWO M PER PIAN
' µ� �Eff�WOKV�WJI.f BMULLXI9iKlED�III II IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII III '
n . !' � zMf.410inC0E�0ifl44 EFOXEPUNTMIG
1 TIFN BM1t MACH �
1 ��nWi[U ��RtU.Ut.�uM�W:u �. • , 1 0.00TB1LL��ET�C�0.J�Y�1' . EBEO�l9VEli ' ' � Z e
J_ p
; � utNnU! ' M1BaVER _NAITTEN WEGFKALICN . . . . �. a .� N� .
.� c�was � b u.�u �vui.xv,n�,.«.m� '��e j.ui.riu �ew�w�� �rnow . . . . � . .g l�� � e� �. �
I 4 � ��"o�rooAOS�m �
� $J
ffWSnauoEl T p � 6 e
... P.�CML' ' nk� I.wutYetUrlviw� u�1.M. xu.ia .i. y� �� . . . l�J� LSL�
� ' e .f 1Y151 1. iriY ' ' — + ��� . . . . . . . �
CONCRETE CURBING N.T.S. 8 GROUND COVER PLANTING N.T.S: 1
_ � a.���, � o
r � . . . . ° cc«c.rw�iia ' .. ••o. � • � • q ��ien A � '' � 3
, . xe nm[. inipsuAemw�m[sa� j ° ) � EV�IAL � � � .
� �,��� ai. � a tsxFmrflVLOtFrH Wll QIJAL 3
ovIOE I Si,v�9 iOR 9lMipN0.TNUeF TREE3TYP. �••�
Yue.� NINU 2 vNOVmETdniFFE6TUt6FOR WieFAiRE6aR WMYARFAS
f � u � l � � m.iR'�WMiiLLw .
3-RNL PVC FENCING N.T.S. 12 .., SLOPE TREE PLANTING N.T.S. 5
• , : N�-. �,��.�
. ., �•�•�� �� — —� — —�. I.WOIINDtMFIVRlMNLCOWR%ANIWGJILLLRfl1VWUM � �� �
.111-111 II�I�11' :lV➢f➢WLCFIlIFRASMYI.IFDH%AMIET. � �� gs
1, fAdRA EQJFAtO BE %ANIFD LNOFAI.LL `JW1B.'.� VAO111M $
_I I I—I I I—i' .,�"„�o.,, �,�¢ �o'f�M,�.��i�, �F�LLY ����5 f 1
� '-III—�' - a.wuxwaamcwmuiusuiuvwmwuattrocm� �' , §
ai.��cn�sn.�ioe+musuam,nm�u��neren�•nou. ovaraxeuucxwxuWUU�ai[nrrr.�um. o s. F�
— ��xro nfa.iurt��
�imuurcoeuar.urmuiuvurno nxanrae,vxe�crmueunrru.v. � .
PAVERS ON COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE N.T.S. 9 ����� µ ;,' -�°•�°,��••• GROUND COVER SPACING N.T.S. 2
. �_„_� ..,,�..o.w ,�. a»,..o,.
r ���.... :���1 ��r�� � �,�
.���u� - �� w �A � �.
.: �
�� .�. � ,
µ,MR .�.�. _�_...� � ,� , :,, n� ��.
�, �.,u�.,. ,�, ��, � � ��
- Bua��:wui01�ni0.�.wa�[I.�.Mtl�wElaO[uouvs. �. ��2CULa.0.tX�T0ALL �
. ' SSau��[IUwVx8rE1t114M1
n�saweiu+uvasiwunce �ir"`.a r�ic�uueawcucuxsuma.•una�rcw��v .. �
. . . m.on�.m�e-,��u.vw.u..am.<a nvs�uueroeeei�eoee1.owsna�u��w.. � �� ��
�'
NC UNIT W/ TUBULAR STEEL fENCING N.T.S. 10 TREE PLANTING N.T.S. 6 SHRUB PLANTING N.T.S: 3
�°--i ..... '—
� � �„��,.,�,��°" — -- — ,�N..� o„�` �:.��P�r,;
��a
., �.»�. "° �'uu� � oetan t6ee�
',' J -...^........... n�nc .� yu ..., .,. .... wiotwenauu e: mam����uu ouanu�.wxium Catn Y14f0u
Job N•..: CY�TII
. . �� . . OnrriL�: '�W
�—� rMy .vr.sx.�.
-.-...,.._ ............. �...�� �e.. � �
r��,r�.:
r ._.. .� �=� � w .,�.�� ����� - ��� � �
..,.... - �,:,; �.�.��� ..�:.: E�.,,Pg�.,,�o � �, �n Ew �,�a w,.u� �� s�e�.
R i_���......_......_ . � �.�.�.....�.v. L-3
� TRASH ENCLOSURE N.T.S. 14 TUBULAR STEEL TRELLIS- TRASH ENCLOSURE N.T.S. 11 VINE PLANTING N.T.S. 7 SLOPE SHRUB PLANTING N.T.S. 4 �� �
Planting Specifications
PaR I - 6eneral �"
IJl My�lttl Ltl /Wb � 1M K�IbY1a1M Z fq O
A��o�MAbP�miMWamroumi�N�C7]Inro�arA��.WO�stupmrcetalM1VwNr9A .NOtmb�NCMbu�mius.mOanNeaMOWkmbi�AY0�4N�C�iNMnemeW�veMGdnb I.WMEi+OictinnPeaEUmWn�pAAnuM49reMYenvYV�qolmuqmwincNnW C.Oun^Ytt�m+mMinQ ..�.a yN
. rtie�IW.uMm.adFWVmWrcm�/YbmnWkkNiieutlWWa�yew�oinYOklonN� . � 9 KnoY.Po�tlIwMIN,w�kpNk�fuN.�ulEVnonaM�W+YN U . ��.7.5
N a�bnaMNtl+�WqsmatpMwre[ommeMNOYK+�MCnASSOrinnnclNwrpnm.vq � � �I�leimW+9�oro0n�Mnlnlalers: MaurybWptlM4�+dd1 M+I�Y9AwirqmMtionNbke�.INphnhUmarcl ' lY bi p
OinIN+NKmn�DKe��. , pe1k.19aG k+1lrltivatrteNMeroVnrylulOm+Ye. 1) M.n'�alMmww�O.�btliqMVettionmmVbxM19N0aNrvotl) � oN'nis��ro�nenlN NW.aqltruiNa.PLhenitls�rvE�s�tl4�4wWa wYmenmw+9enew9�orlNab ',9 �
� PWdP9uq n.vwWWnonV{wGVUMwwr4MelmonE�un�mqs�rNlNre0an9��nin OWWM�A'tip aldall-slb. � . . rMinnrv�ku�Y 9mwN.AYVrvrtinDbMVNNMStrMVhGtl IkOINmWkkbY+P . G,�S ��
� . 1.YHI�tlWGO ' ' Ih6.Nrtmun'nVAVIhGUn4lbanVW�O. . � .21.feNtreYVhNi�NaeatMwxlSLLmmmxcWkNfa�flNNeo�.SN.IKp.IVN �n+u►M�hrewnaraan.wumw�r�iai.xa.. . 6 IS$ �
�A., bPNOn+�NtlbP�^^NEY�CboiCounM1lYVnsxurrn tliebphiMViC.PII-bwm4n . MheesatlfMAffu4PItlLYCOMativ�ilutlEeWtleV�11Nf1atlxOM9MUtltimYiulEYl1 ' 1.00OWunkel D.. iMCOMUb WOrtfao�Cenl�ieCFReiutb mPdmMNemolmm�vwmp�oMhwExh ' l�J�� G i S
sMCMpXaepnarma0�pm11mqnionvlbYfl�/aiGwryWmmmenameN011uWUpvq ��yy�yyybilM�rySbO.iAVte9MO�11yNn�MhenawOhamlMmclw�nblpeW . ]I W�+OptNmqrtmtlnmupAl�bammmunMp�clfi•brapeNON2mme[Wwwehb b°°w1.�2°��IOUIeenWd/rtpa�bC%o�6Wy�vEirymeOiWnAtlesbiry
. . qiMa0diW4tlmefrchom�blmAdN IXisunNYeMevlh.LnMtle6uneki+AatlMmewuM6ntlmtcwexrrnermb.MY�n pemiuM�OiatlutlsEUN. ^ �R 1° Q
bit0om�luOMabNn�. . �MsbMmcl�tlwsW+M1PeetbuqmNnJnM+witmY.�00MbalWrps�iesNlb�af 11 Oe¢elme�brcY4�2mmnwnM�.MniOkamo-seYErnErtd�iK�shwoi E MeLbOnGatlCu490emtlSr�neG��oO,nNemmNeanoIYC1'ueoNbASa�nopwm.
'llUpoammpMunalliAsMqe�.�ailp�ryurmnutltinlitleew. � pyp�yPi�M��qtllrclwm.W�cs�t�lM;OMabr�erNmuvol/Y� iYNF[U6Geqy<�qnYedlmrd�OU�Snmoveu0tliae.
tl N °
n MTMtlMN4MfNtioWbi0tWr9.�16h�vnW�a1[hntlr9hbb�MN bbnNFLltlmno�mNMntlYOn. i. SbutlWFivaiwoleyFWiM�A��Yenf.NiWflu�bnObWmme0bl/�N�
fMbf. .lJl�itl/WIY SI�Nb�eWIrcwKMmalM1mbiwnNYnuCaxM+Geqmmw nwIyMI1YY.NN�,oONINmtlMinop�lo0.N01otlm0ri�bMdlMn�A4M'.Ywn�9 r. j
A 7a0wIUWnIMOtlWmMLtGmCe�bml.MUYnhiYMwllW�luGO�hnNw�h 1&tinRM�mvk4qaMlbmo�D��qan�Imna�MN�tlMnin aMpb�NW�uaovqkiea�anl! FW.
]I iNtlWw�aP�ne�V�+qsWtleMtwu4a�oM1mennwmpYW. 1 ,u . S
PG� y�pytl.leG�Il�lulaMimbSMn2.A7,lep�ol4oltln��pnlrc.ibm. Q Iwmll�pplr+Lk)✓uAOemowNW�kpq�rcmaMOn��eelt/baaLUh�ralkWT.X� d
L �1YW0'up^7.i^qWn.nlrowlO�nNUtlbnW60sqmYMaieOk�umNmaN4�fAYN AINalikm�leANitnAMO��nbroMwYInW�WDWtteA9iMunaM�roMinmb�rin9 .YrcMGWnG�imvaan�stlnCUab]unM�GUMKnKxwwoln�wan.Awkmmork9men
B. BKd11mtlMYtNIM ObnO Wbbn INmaenqeeuNaun Gnp. �
Gwp/GAn.QWiunm,uid6uwidNFUY�m'M. inWb% !�9 /9ma' iqi�uq oAOnWaaiLhC� OunY.olayYlm�ol4lMenmYont�na.�tniubmonnOVfMnbwqM4qhwm. �o•t� ,��;:
� C. MMWrpulnmmlloitllphNmMhlMelp�xlqnGatNfiMoM�NUMryMwAY�T11NUY tl�MnNIM0lmIUq4Wk:. ��nN� H. ihnbr�Mpn�l�ppYuLY{tl{ful/bF�b.NM.p'�'MUw.OUiNi1q�.WUEWtlwiIW -
ae�ue0bYW5�a4'tY<amMeslonwNMwuMIWa�lpin � �) 76Y�7YmNNWaiI a wwroaimaaw; «mm.�m..���.rone�.m�am��.mw»waa�awv�a.
�xi 2worvs�ewua.wam.a.Meea��wunal.aaanwmwl � � Dm+wmobu:�a..a��mmevrzw+��mmmlmMwmnwrommmiirimmo�.
waq mu ee wmmse n�w..ro, wan robmow+uiwon m�wmon �nmm n
. ./Ji We�IN ]I IS Vou�'Go-PmnPW aN+NCkNIm Mi u � WtlMa eV�n �i+�W b pcEUn ib A. Aemon �Miq OaM wP E�mn. UMn ro c��un�Ww� �N00riallh MM in �ouow�M
' A MVWmEM,hWIA�O+dRmm�N/D�ImNw-0ttMwliVS]W4GW✓�r�i+�1. . ^N�^e^_u�YnlNM1bei.N-0nOn.wE.btll]�.itl . Gul¢PeohMwnmah. .
aryNlMe�.MWw+b.miMmmfu46sWO�wilm�nNibr�D�al]/SJMMmp� . �/) iWUMlwn�ula �Wi�nOiektipuieOUYR�NNOm. j
ma.maiwuao�.er�7a�cawtr. � sl��Go-Po.ti�amro�cmwmnw.nue,�nmiunm f�ibu I.AWb.Wrn K NnutlxmdWnb�nn@+m: . ' b
S OuAplMpiurs9wpMOY.xrynutnWbWYMMY.mlwq.aFpaaa6Mn�hqle pr . . I) �P�ro�4W��.ds/�b�ull+mkqarkolt�R<MdNtiYaAbnW.
C. MEabiOmYUIItMbOUtmNMndnilvA/msli�xXiWG1. Fub M�BMn IOO6�.Wrn 140b9C+^4ema. a
noswwe.eew,m�.ew�mena.aa�.w..m�. � a..eaaos�neowi i csm�aie�a�,�,. �e,�,�,amw,. . ��. ����
C MpWsnMWlam6in�ccopow�fNMOApnYro2MN�i�mO�p�tlM�bn. iJ]W�w,WOn,W1M . ]I EMmMeWOMnWmab.a'dnN� _ . `. � �
qN M1iu 1000pdW��cn DI r�.w�mew�muwcbr:x.nom.�*wNMU�n.�mn:swwma�inoow�an, � gs
o. Menwm�e.��er..eio��aommand.n+unw�aaaerwumxu�am,eaaww �. t�.�wam,eeere,Mr. lOtmlYM�tr+qMVrYredb�fe0b20NObPn. YnJ i
hatY '4aJaw/opWCMNher . IOWb�pawe 4i�mlNmunol2y{4We iNlirtlpOY�#bniNlb�bbMnik25NmO]OIAEryoIM V
eosiqNGNorfa'wq B. In�unWlN'ClnatMfmnNmunCCyVAt.CO Gmm�hlbm4Ri/1071-2]09.oipuY � . � � m,IwiunupenoEWMeu MyGUUI.bnhMxnM/6mWEMhNy. { . � �..�
WlhqXalan�hbnoperalunnP+��Pe0�1er�FUlEe»]eEbtlyWY,poaEnw�uWkniNNbi 6 � _
. C. RaalErhn�Ntlbbal0eo�telmv�A+duiNEY6brrbmM�n01�Mr..oi�VwL aYtWNd.MakAihYWb+OdMY��uM�mu�mitlulAMYUeWbrmyC�Me01MiMMiOU�N� 11 OstlICW1¢��Attlbennwve0homtlY�iYwNMl�Mnunum. .
IMMWM O.�ANaiYwA�tNtlWTmICa�a.7PI1Bm.nNNWMW6Aewlomltl..MO.aiMWl IheblbnMUODUw. � 61 fuMaMMNl�roW�aukMMO�nCM�IpMnWhltlm�pr�zAMJNUMn�uun.b �
Contr�[br�NYaqaNynmMCWtiMhwhnpeqpintlnpuwilttwmpY4onHIW�Apitllnpn0 . � HtlIMOnweXOnalWGqoiCauJr. �
ya� tl iW al w110nprtqannk i�W Ywl G pMeimM o/ w apqo.el qiewme Wb hWp Mtxn unY uY IiIW �m��M. .
YEaM7W�MIne1W�MYMYW�WYi4ry�uhhwN�Nbnnwmm�MLnrobiwllM�W�lan � ' MtlIMiNYti•Y.✓.nn0ienm�N .iMYYarWIMCM4M '
W/�0 Wtl1J mb 7M �tlh rtDO� Mommad�tlan J�A4Y f�a[t0enm ava mYJmm mahnM Mf ]-SY h. C�t el fOM . IkaWbJ Po mlMwu� Daba. AiW WIle mirLmN n� Yftae atl Cs� ta ardba A
W MNlmpplutloe dm WtlkM Nnn eeli �Aen Rry vtiM tly �MaeeE miKnwu.
Part 1U - EYecutlon �� x.�. nw� ��� �.�m��sa,�„�e�b.�,
� � Mf'GOiruf�xniNwemex bRiriEa.Wh^4We.NMeriOn.IeRieiln,adhpitiGnmwMiMMbtlrbPom�.NG
. L � ��,� . . . la�unentlbn�WqMidLatrNwMpa.atre�kl.hPo�NTM'a�muMi��imEnY+mne� .
Parl11-Mate�lals iMGroWVamlMnpd4Winpmabur+skUirNm66NOro�GeEairtmo�v9WFlnti� Haumaese�h�tlsiMMhoE+YnYeNHimlwN�mt. °'�
rtmo.iqnWatlOWlfawlw�InO��mek�Wk�4i91o��mmpwbrmW�ltlrtnsHtl bOrtmaMet6krrtWrtmerJkbrtWl'YIWlmO�llrtmaMC�uel.IMYdn.xA YI�CYrO�
ahpebbinib�YrotAAknW4AeJbem4rym�puubtuyar�ibw�YatlnmanNepin� �-0a�efpvamuMhlel�lon.,^�IUryEN6Wetkutl6q'enmm•64N.
� Y/ MN4 � W MwrY W WNY W rYrd. . . IIWn mmVkAen attlr nM1. tlu GnbrbrN4uraeN �YOm W �wYru iemow aau m9M+E.
�FNIanNwllmeMmeMmryln[1tlenYaJO�Wtpe�Al[mleii�bfRCM1NM1ertinNYUlb. �� � Am�mLeA�JmuNWSNIEemahknNbaEepNW6n�MpMprorb�pplWian. �ypyN.kEn�,ak neeptlNreN�Otth,aubt.pi0en.vWM�M�6,mArtmawm�uWtlbn �
W
. . appWlaUarabYWkaeJOntliepbuorMPy13.06.B�tlRYMMIdWPnY0i.5oIlFrtprabn. �� & App4raon�. � 9�V���A�p�mlui . . . .
� . . ronm. �� iatNrsr� � �Mpmu�d��YiryMUhwN.dw�der�qnomwnrxnMwmu���mmmimaon.namm . � ��. ^�&
A. iMiYmr.6lutlb'fio-0ocerPM'utlfnPO+elEOprmpWYnplNklsamMaEUrtEbi A. �tll+A�p urdsq, up�pr�EiyWflmMdy�tirytNtlbewmpkle0pnobkpnnrqsoil petetplCaetHppepwcoeAbawrtWpbM'nObw� IWNdeEbMhrtdb2eolai - p
� LWIrmGlYeieYUiOrvcimitrnG,Nu III/Ii5DLl0 vqud � PeNiwn �yq/racrt � s e� .
& Oipkeau�mmemmewlwdna?�aroeeRewmoixauw<e,naMw,m�wmx�in, & soi�aw�+�+obepin.Riiameunpn�tle�u.anuw mrvmuuhcu .Sinwn�M4m*a �rtmc�dwm.�hc.emudWwLe�wamuemwumw.rt ����
� x o1B'qioibinnWl4qWlmeMmmn
Mtlmim M 15 rW bEb iYOapen WIeAtl raN1mlp ww� erpin b uucrept�k
4 �W+i<SatlAmeMmertSeNRinudLPriYm�We. G ilnh O niry u J s i e e e m n h� N O h N 1 dC� I D WHwa k a b WC�+ 4aea u W e�9 n O Ca l AINrtvPnWOEemp4dMtleGwrmivmdnlSMxiMGrormi�i0lemWmlkbr
YI: �YmeehAxabrsMq/IawANazwW'WIxaV+bkR^mMenxtlnYbisl N � �� V � � �
1Mk�abrvpoqetlWl�oqw[mdtlmeN0uM11amM�aaliN.inps6rcirWa n¢Yffi ...
M� „
Lf T'M '^r�e^w u� r+�W � U S 7 �
I.IwJinpe�WbrWM�ImaRluill�i<WrtE1+�mmtlpbMvqie�pvmnmp:BqAOO�lig 3WE�.oryavexil�narAme2Gmio�erPYn'I��IIaqWcMtifrtilmEeivuryeiaNm A I.Ia1bNeGntru.bhnspon;Aifrybm+im�in�GWaEwYenryO�W+��bamunO�Onpq� a {i�1�►��
wIIWIhMmassurueuhihhe4mholtl�Dnl�'uYtleEh'bf4ntrxbiNNam4ie✓e+M �miNmumB'Arnqh4n^1t ��ql. ' wqilNiulrrsYWVemhnA . . . . . . . .
tlaMWrtmaM��%�PaOhaeinlAeCaMxbiW1[aoN�u�EewtblhG�NUqa�G�M�dmM�cb�h ��� B. MnWIakMLIxVbMiy�xOYM�Le�beuM1bw�MWOrv'w.R4YM��lttin�mo6rtffi�0emin �
� Mewalltlwilsq uEm1�m@nrzpohol�lmtlnp�pe^ry pmiJNSOIIt trtpblertdbylM6YY � ' ' tl�4�T�MbkuntillMmieAdiboWMmeEl�mmpkleh++�++��mtlYEatlomatllaMbk. . ' . .
qierYmevemmtelwil5o11sM11u�etlyviunhtir�wmpoilbnWSOUNpa��iAbwWybm A.�PbnluqerolrtmmmeMWlmm0emm4ertluoupl�feEwryin�Inaatl+bai�mirtwmmeMN � .
Nneb�.rdMlmolioaG.cMi.W�twmWpntlunllnAlnprtlesltiniersbn.pocbeolewise M1omJUM�W�A�patllaGNxb�awmsatlmpomltiYrybipLVYUpYttaaEim. G �� - �
uN.mnou`taL.6rti.MUn.Metlw40er.1�lulmiblNesM1lwMiwnio0ma�atlw B.'LneMSMq�. . - .cti_i:np�ci:
WnirJOYiM[bNWvlOCesewGNsm�.SO'ilNilmvelbblMiry+dAtlONlrtCme�: %Nlala4WqEWlJIDaMiriNeGaENlbakqt&bulassnWioOekkf.�' I) mmrt�wuonxMmamackeMmw�oveNaa�oo.n��mrm+mo�
- �. fttlOOnliM.Satl-ESS.S1.251.Chy.101mauevw.tlrunO.W,�eErbypri9onfmib �rt+pl>beMbm+Yabb�a�.�YplvaMbWlEe6blbMEnmvMWfead�bredb � kmWautlbanuvpapeiyml�uNlfiWSrsittnwAlNnM1PVVrtmpaa . . Nu
�WYak1�bAS111017L 4mlebivw/L�Nebm.IlMeOOeMEtmeJelbb�ItinElMUa.mMOGUiIbI ������� .
S Pmee+OJtIRm.NOlFsspmO5wle11]mmIK�InumrmonM2ncbl51mml0veeu PWh4WMObmdauudih{ANhra�nimb0uh�rxrttRwOe��Yfa'sA9Me tl Al�mepcknmbd.aeaNYAOniMnEU�Y/NYSWae�ma^MEm51+�emMyOeul . E�OLIN01m0{
+bnmNMxm�lnrs�iGASiNUilJlaotei�AMemetlnl�. aMauemewie.emM.u.9�rtwi�nuixr�v�iee.d..m.awnea�rc.ean rtrvt.�Mb�ttb�e^Y�Yi�Ib4me�bkiedunuaM1 ihaYSemNUOeWAae�b�
�mo n mmme. um,.o d��.�e. masn x kraea �. � wm. ma emm w.. mu �
G ApiaWNSUWiFI.IGemD�ililu0hwuekmuoWnpeiAMmVbmi4�afN. BaMn�0ei0Ya1M�IWWmmo+��Y4iNOVhre�iwWlnMroIl�nNSNtetee.� II�mMoh�sNlbePuomvneemoo�auiltimeoiFalenwraionsqdMluWMu.
MeiINWCSWOaIerN�wrour4^YlMiaa0. � P�+ht�ntl
7Ji MM�IIOI�iw\M�1 L. Gouadfmvr !J/ rabbYm
AIwMwNbilrnYWUIVrowEUwVIr�4n9WtlbehEvWM�IWkNmsklMwhE GmwammriWiertWWPW�In�hYAertamn.mmM�R�reiutlerv+bwtleaouantla . AlaoaW�WeaEYIM1eCaMxmiuMe�N�mm�atlupbemvN�neaM4YeGwmeim��D�ol
�Wb�iEwnWnen.SvtlwN�AMEeamewM,maqY.a�aMMUdim�polntrmloiimr�perUml pyi�y.�o���me��bpopo��anautlatVe141�nilinamnmW�i1 rotku1Nn90lrysbomtlwEbNmtlanxuq�nudr�WOlmr�MUnu. ' G+te: Iy1Rm10
. a,�vma �w�aawwrc.mm.�w�.n�..n.wmrown�n�ma>�Ma.ommw �. si.inm.��..<w�.
J.:b W..: iM�ill
�. Iwn:SrNmuNMG%rOYrt �Ine0.AealuwnWUtlOUrlMiamrtbtiomkYYwilatlEifnlhlhLMm�dWehW�b 11.1lrihiuxePo�J4WMYa�uNlNekmnO�lUeGmNammGkbObsm�laim�N Drarn�ti. ftl.
mreaO�G�quwle0nn�er9NmtleMlepNOlraCikk hm�m�ebfumm. '
x,��ttanw�MSima...a.,nemonuroroe�w�. o. wra.�owea.�muw.u.a t) Ye+vYmmekaNabtNYMaWhWFb�YWkVm9NMaiM1iu�mPk6
a Itrrevm.
kobw�awavaram..�r�e�mea.amu�amiwemomam.aunw�edw.� +i xmm+ua�mahwa7.�caw7�cmwman.�weeeuaaamb�moenN�on
. LM M��ImmYPM1��.«Mrl wa;ewau�nm.in�me.a�eanrma. � hmonewr�wncd
w
� 'WYr. � fiir�IGn�albnsMUtlbaM��wC�i nkrliq�4ibmwurwotlerPUnPm+u� � 6 GJe�Li�unce:
.anaurnwmmwieemaa�mp.eie. wrwar4 �1 a��i�.mnmmcmonbnesounlmdmunimumeMme�ioa.mepryiareo�w/,
sw: swaa�cxneainwseow.�� s��aasaw�d�aaa��t.wm�.�a.iwu�uemru�m�nror. koa�++�nninw.am.emeumrnw��. � .
. . . .WMA: FOa�NtlbonEUUabamutlubwwaawoaV�Oo�umlYaqWCmaeiiYmasAatlM . . . xl. Rlvsniesrokaawiqirao�n�Nl<veMNemu�kwreG�roa�irol+llmwirtwd� . . . � .
olwEitlun2yNal�itlMpmelmv�uNbrm�WrywMnmiad�lhwler.MamialNJdi . � ' � .L EMetmaimeMm�Ntla[uvonhonvMmu[vqmretr�IM1eCrymGexq. � SMet:
, INJGM NAena9mwritlulmlEeM+�minMml�OVe. � � 11 Pmem�N�MRiuEesrouNWiCW�eiAOlnue�nm¢KrcOi�n�ytlmsx0mm�lesa �
M
� ����,�. �,.� ����ma,ZO,a�,,,p� R�,�.a�� L-4
� 2YtlW: aYO� N�cwn.a ' " .
9 Iqm AiahGbhomPoliueefWfaG.l11JI51A-SSIS. . . . .
p CI: {
x
S
� . , r�. � y>X�... .':%' � � ' ^� "� ��wvrcrocarwioamxru.w
i ,� �; �, . . _ � , , v�vnswoncrounan[wamtcann PUNT LEGEND
� � GYrawrKnruv�uO n�wiui�xF
\ /;- . : � ..� � wmw��nuwn�osm.��ontrt�auuu. � ^• •• •^�••• .••
_ wrwiwrs�wwcarnwwoio�wcc.ea � �� � ..
- _ 'y:�. � wwwim.nswrorrnowxNexiar�ux� �.•� '. ; �
� ro.ur�wma � � '� � �
µ , .�' /.. .,��` ' y �rM[IMOYU[16RG�u�UIFROWfa. � �+• � �
��('� f aennnxs�ouauoc �
'� � � ' q5' . ' - {� i IRWIIOIWIXIRS�RRSI�I . —_y I r � ~ � � � � �
1JP91M(}�MIIIS ■ �( ,
•�� 4 �. = � � - - m iw.�mnx � auxncwo wwuoi � . � `_.�. = . — � � i a �
,�+/ i - �����y - / �,` _ I naom��aro,ewa�mr . � � d' `��
. �� � yG � � �
J � �ly . ; �;� "' . ..r,;i, .. - — �•� . • ` �...� ... `
_ . , b � ;�` \' • � � � � � ��
MH �.r 1 _ . . �.�.,�o ...w, � �`r� .c\/` • ,. .�... a......� • .. � � � ��
— � � ` � `1 � ,�.� . .. . �. � r`
, , ` - # `Z p, �
' � . " `� ��-� ��` � � - : � ... .. _
; � � � ,` �, ; �;y . 0 — _� . � �
,..,.,, � . _ � � _ . �
��.,, � s. � , :�:��-= f� �:� . i i i � �� �,
�'�� '� = - � � :: �1,��
�:- � .
� � � -�-� , � ;:,; '� � � � ° :: ._
� � � '-, �� '' ,"" � � �...: � ,. .
'c�n ' � ;,i� t . �,�� � i =-
,i , u�• � . 'i� r � � � ..� —
_ . �� , ,1 ',� : a�. � : �.�.��.�..�.��... � �
�° `pe ...M1gs�
- . . ,� ' .� � ., A , .. v� �9,� y ��
�.�,., ;, `., o : kc �
�, � � � � s �.� � �'
, � �.��., ._.. ,; �� � � ��
. �' �� � -� � �
I , , i ., . � . , ' � . „ 6i1'- .
I sem oMC.a�m�
� !!1""I� 11"� �. - �
� ��,y�� �''— _ .f
l . � _� �
. �'�, --_ � ;''�' laY�uM MY
�� . - — —� --- - � ��
'
� .�
\ ��. \`. . . e.arru ,v,rrrt�i�:. , u� � ~ ' . . ' . . . .. DaK �1�M
.roMwM r _.. i � - " . .
• c . ��., li�.��: It Y'[i:. ;Ir:r
y � � ����,�,A;:: � '� �. i,;,;.., ,.., �mNo.: YFlll
1.�. ..\ . ".. . . _... _ _ _ . . .
� CALLE GIRASOL
a,«� W r
u�y�
Nr1Y� �dr • ��M nr
rwarww�.rwr�werwrr+��r.rr .,oti.�owwaam,..w�+reo�.o.nerw�AUnu�.rrwa. �el'.M' wm
�r ���� Y��r ���`y, ] YY�N 1 pw 1 W�M 5�fe. llhYLLp� 11 �m If ib AN' Ot 101lIY�Y �!
CRAPHIC SCAIE �
... .... �:eo�.� ��� �rNr.ar.arr+.w�rrrr..ur.o�r�.a.rrrw�sur �-�
� • - �rce+�.rawruw�rwarad�+mo�ar.�m.c�wrawea�+mam,imqs.bua�c�cn,.a� maawiioEwme.r�.... —
� u�rdtmr.siue�mWm.rramnoms+�m.��ro.orocarw�n..�r`rwnimaermo wnuswdsraro�.MOSearrio�w.eom:np.
uae+m�w ¢nwu rs�r a f.NMw� War. CuWma�Yn MrwN�wJY�atl��nR�YMYn�nl 1�� 1m 1 d {
��� � _ ' y � t � Z
- - - � . . _ - - -- - -�� - .. _ . �� ���
3� {��
, ., ,.
<. T �� � ' �'lC.t �' . ����. . � i � +t 4 ; � . �� �.a. � � �f.i � � � y ��'� '� ! ' ,��'� ° �
A - � � ' 'e
.�, N
_ _ �4�
Ekvotlon (rom porkinQ lot J - -°'-' - . - _ . . _ . _ _ � -. _ -, +.-. ,. - .: _,_.-„_ . . .. . ; - __ -
� �I �
_�� _ � 1� ��
� �: . , .
a .x -
,� �, � j ' ° � ' 4
- - - , , .�,. - '' s
_ „� . ,..., • . .,�,r _ �� :
„
� _..i � �,�.,, w : _ --
..� s �c� ..a I��I n- s�u� �,�.�1 �w� �. .cza _:a� ��¢s +r T J�'.�
r _ __ � �
. -- _ _ . _ . . _ _: _ �
. � �'
Elevation (iom Calle Girasol �, i � ��
: a A
� � .��
�
�,.�.�.
fl.o�rn
uv: raw
y ,a� Ho. 1►�m
. y
lraw�ey. �
I �'
I
i
' �' - • - . �� - �---:1�:-'4:_ . - .��w. .._.: �a� ..r , . .
r _— _.'_. . ..Y��V��� � :.2�i..- . '. .—.....
_ . . . . . .. . . . . .. r . . . �—i . � _ 9i�ect:
GRAPHIC SC�lE
Elevafion (rom Auuie Avenue Ekvation (rom parking lot � L�6
a- �
DH RESOLUTION
DH RESOLUTION NO. 10-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA PA09-0061, A DEVELOPMENT
PLAN WITH A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A 8,264 SQUARE FOOT
RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON 3.15 ACRES WITHIN VL
ZONING, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF CALLE GIRASOL AND AUSSIE AVENUE AT
31640 CALLE GIRASOL
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On February 23, 2009, Joseph Van Haaster, filed Planning Application No.
PA09-0061, a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in
accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
and environmental review on September 9, 2010, at a duly noticed public hearing as
prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA10-0061
subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning
Application No. PA09-0061 conformed to the City of Temecula's General Plan and
Development Code.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Director, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Plan (Section 17.050.010.F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City;
The project has been conditioned to ensure it is in conformance with the City of
, Temecula General Plan and other ordinances of the City, and State Law.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\DH Resolution with Neg Dec or NOD.doc
The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Planning, Building and
Safety, Public Works, Fire, Community Services and Police Departments to
ensure the project is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and
general we/fare. In addition, the project has also been reviewed by a variety of
externa/ government agencies as part of the Initial Study process to further
ensure that the project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and
general welfare.
Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04.010.E)
C. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code;
The proposed religious facility is located within a Very Low (VL) residential
district. These types of uses require a Conditional Use Permit in VL zones. The
project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure it is consistent with the City
of Temecula General Plan and Developmenf Code.
D. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and
development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional
use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures;
The proposed use is for a religious facility /ocated within a Very Low (VL)
residential district. According to the City of Temecu/a Development Code, these
types of uses are allowed in all residentia/ districts upon the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. Custom single-family homes surround the project on all
sides with the exception of the south and west sides. An existing public park is
located at these directions. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by
the Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works, Fire, Community Services and
Police Departments to ensure it will not adversely affect adjacent uses, buildings
or structures. In addition, external government agencies have had an opportunity
review and comment on the project during the Initial Study process.
E. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas,
landscaping, and other development features prescribed in this Development Code and
required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with
other uses in the neighborhood;
The proposed project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Planning
Building and Safety, Public Works, Fire, Community Services and Police
Departments to ensure that the requirements for yards, walls, fences, parking
and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features
required in the City of Temecula Development Code have been satisfied. As a
resu/t, the project is designed to integrate into the surrounding area.
G:\PLANNING�2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\DH Resolution with Neg Dec or NOD.doc
F. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health,
safety and general welfare of the community;
The projecf is for a religious facility located in a Very Low (VL) residential zoning
district. Religious facilities are a conditionally permitted use in the VL zone. Two
religious facilities already exist in the immediate area. The project has been
reviewed and conditioned by the Planning, Building and Safety, Public Works,
Fire, Community Services and Police Departments to ensure that the project will
not be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community.
G. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the
application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the
record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal.
The decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for the
Conditional Use Permit will be based on substantial evidence in view of the
record as a whole before the Director of Planning.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Director hereby makes the
following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of
the Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Application: :
A. An Initial Study was prepared for the project in an effort to further evaluate
if the project would generate any potentially significant impacts to the environment. This
document was submitted for distribution and review on May 25, 2010. The results of
the Initial Study show environmental impacts for the project are all less than significant
with the mitigation proposed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program developed for the
project.
B. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit Application, as described in the Initial
Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff
determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a
significant effect on the environment and a(Mitigated) Negative Declaration was
prepared.
C. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the (Mitigated) Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on May 25, 2010, and expired on June 23, 2010.
Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the
offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California 92590.
D. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Director and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\DH Resolution with Neg Dec or NOD.doc
E. The Planning Director has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at
the September 9, 2010 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds
that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2)
there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the
environment; and (3) Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment
and analysis of the Planning Director.
F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Director
hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA09-0061, a Development Plan with Conditional
Use Permit to construct and operate a 8,264 square foot religious facility on 3.15 acres
within VL zoning, generally located on the northeast corner of Calle Girasol and Aussie
Avenue, at 31640 Calle Girasol, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on
Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Director
this 9th day of September 2010
Patrick Richardson, Planning Director
I, Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby
certify that the forgoing DH Resolution No. 10- was duly and regularly adopted by
the Planning Director of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the
9th day of September 2010.
Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary
G:\PLANNING\2009\PA09-0061 Jehovah Witness DP CUP\Planning\Hearing\DH Resolution with Neg Dec or NOD.doc
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA09-0061
Project Description: A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit to construct and
operate a 8,264 square foot religious facility on 3.15 acres within VL
zoning, generally located on the northeast corner of Calle Girasol
and Aussie Avenue at 31640 Calle Girasol
Assessor's Parcel No.: 957-120-019
MSHCP Category: Commercial
DIF Category: Exempt (Non-Profit 501 c)
TUMF Category: Exempt (House of Worship — Section 15.08.040.F.9)
Approval Date: September 9, 2010
Expiration Date: September 9, 2010
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project
PL-1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand
Seventy-Four pollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,074.25) which includes the Two
Thousand Ten Dollar and Twenty-Five Cent ($2,010.25) fee, required by Fish and
Game Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Sixty-Four pollar ($64.00) County
administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated
or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and
California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the
applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of
condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
PL-2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby
agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defer�d the City with Legal Counsel of
the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or
proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages
resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to
include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed
officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City
shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or
proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the
defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City
deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
PL-3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this project.
PL-4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
PL-5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for
good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at
a time.
PL-6. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within the completed Mitigated Negative Declaration.
PL-7. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
PL-8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
PL-9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping
is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the
property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape
plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of
the developer or any successors in interest.
PL-10. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers,
landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the
property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or
repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters.
Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure
all trash bins are covered at all times.
PL-11. The applicant shall paint a three-foot by three-foot section of the building for Planning
Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
PL-12. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL-13. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial
equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the
request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment
of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its
decision.
MATERIAL COLOR
Primary Stucco ICI Paints — 4428 Aged Stucco
Exterior Shutters ICI Paints — 3212 Burnt Umber
Entry Doors, Window Trim, Accent ICI Paints — 4405 Thatched Cottage
Stucco
Stone Work Chardonnay PF-8104
Curbside Walkway Natural Texture Mat Stamped Concrete
Dryvit Terraneo Serengeti No. 202
Roof Tile Hanson Roof Tile Weathered Shake
Oakwood Blend, No. WS-546
PL-14. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site.
These shall be clearly labeled on site plan.
PL-15. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations submitted August 23,
2010, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of
Approval.
PL-16. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the
City's Development Code.
PL-17. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and
reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit
(including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed
circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in
scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration,
reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional
Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its
Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in-
lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City
Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or
conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such
Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code
violation thereon.
PL-18. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and
construction debris.
PL-19. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
PL-20. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls,
fencing, recreational facilities and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property
owner or maintenance association.
PL-21. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as
regular solid waste containers.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PL-22. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double
detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
PL-23. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations
not visible from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director.
PL-24. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise
the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of
the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole
discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/
cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such
determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the
discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the
property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a
mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning
Director."
PL-25. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with
the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of
cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the
development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
PL-26. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent
discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist
and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to
investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation.
PL-27. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop
and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their
designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources
discovered on the property.
PL-28. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading,
excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing,
and studies, to be compensated by the developer.
PL-29. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all
archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for
proper treatment and disposition.
PL-30. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.
PL-31. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey
protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day
preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works.
PL-32. The following shall be included in the Notes Se,ction of the Grading Plan: "No
grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting
with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls,
whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be
conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing
owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site,
then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval.
If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction
survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and
relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as
March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March
15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take
place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg
laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a
qualified biologist."
PL-33. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL-34. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
PL-35. All downspouts shall be internalized.
PL-36. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the
plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance
and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The
plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee
Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
PL-37. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shail provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to
be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to
infringe on this area.
PL-38. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape
site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline
is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without
loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-head
coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper
landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond."
The applicanUowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections.
PL-39. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The
contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation
inspection."
PL-40. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per
Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost
estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable
water budget.
PL-41. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who
shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL-42. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three
landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours
without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open
trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head-to-
head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper
landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond."
The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections.
PL-43. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans
including all structural setback measurements.
PL-44. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the
construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in
any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be
shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
PL-45. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot
clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before
' starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of
utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around
utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
PL-46. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not
limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as
appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
PL-47. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements
made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and
demolition debris.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
PL-48. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification
by the Planning Director or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance
shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and
irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final
landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for
the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to
scheduling for the final inspection.
PL-49. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted
mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right-of-ways. If
upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or
backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way
adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a
sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved
by the Planning Director.
PL-50. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL-51. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department
for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to
the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL-52. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol ofAccessibility. The sign shall not be smallerthan
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible
spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license
plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away
at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by
telephoning (951) 696-3000."
PL-53. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
PL-54. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be
installed.
PL-55. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
PL-56. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood
Control District's transmittal dated March 3, 2009, a copy of which is attached. The fee
is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a
cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless
deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan
fee.
PL-57. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated February 9, 2009, a
copy of which is attached.
PL-58. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the Eastern
Municipal Water District.
PL-59. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated March 10, 2009, a copy of which is attached.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
General Conditions/Information
B-1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings.
B-2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of
the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Electrical Codes; California
Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access
Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
B-3. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on
plans.
B-4. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
B-5. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
B-6. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
B-7. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be
submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption
from School Mitigation Fees.
B-8. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
B-9. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and
any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.
B-10. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance Number 94-21,
specifically Section G(1) of Riverside County Ordinance Number 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction
are Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to
6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays or Government Holidays.
B-11. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a
Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This
project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The
fees are subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at
the time of building permit issuance.
B-12. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
At Plan Review Submittal
B-13. Provide a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance
Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor
lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and
Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon
adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
B-14. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
B-15. Provide a Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the
Section 1207, of the 2007 edition of the California Building Code.
B-16. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions
of the 2007 edition of the California Plumbing Code.
B-17. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities.
B-18. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the
building and the truss manufacturer engineer.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
B-19. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans.
Prior to Beginning of Construction
B-20. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of
the building construction.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
F-1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
F-2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall
provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 PSI
residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration. The Fire Flow as given above has
taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City
Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R).
F-3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix C. A combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a
looped system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets.
Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no
more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent
hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC
Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020, Section R).
F-4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required (CFC Chapter 5, Section 508.5).
F-5. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.4).
Prior to Grading
F-6. Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any
cul-de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.4 and 503.2.5
along with the City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E).
F-7. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed
loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface so as to provide all-weather driving
capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of
.25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction all locations
where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. When
temporary fire apparatus access roads are approved by the chief and provided for use
until permanent fire access roads are installed; the fire apparatus roads shall be an all
weather surface for an 80,000 Ibs GVW (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.3 and City
Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E).
F-8. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6) inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and City Ordinance
15.16.020 Section E).
F-9. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent (CFC
Chapter 5, Section 503.2.7 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E).
F-10. This development shall maintain two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads,
as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.1.2).
F-11. F-11 Prior to building construction dead end road ways and streets in excess of
one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a
turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.5
and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E).
Prior to Building
F-12. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all
private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a
registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block;
and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire
flow requirements are being met for the on site hydrants. The plans must be submitted
and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14, Section 1412 and
Chapter 5, Section 501.3).
F-13. Prior to issuance of building permit fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted
prior to the issuance of building permit.
F-14. Prior to issuance of building permit fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the
installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to
have a dedicated circuit from the house panel.
F-15. Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification plans shall be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the
wildland-vegetation interface (CFC Chapter 47).
F-16. Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The
measures shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible
barriers (cement or block walls), and fuel modification zones (CFC Chapter 47).
Prior to Occupancy
F-17. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots)
(City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E).
F-18. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or
approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible
from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their
background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a
minimum of twelve (12) inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six (6)
inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family
residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire
Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5, Section 505.1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020
Section E)
F-19. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile
home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the
complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification,
unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and
design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention
Bureau prior to installation.
F-20. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a"Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5, Section 506).
F-21. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5, Section
506).
F-22. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the
Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.3).
F-23. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy,
buildings housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of
California Fire Code Chapter 23 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association
standards. The storage of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design
considerations or modifications to the building. Fire protection and life safety features
may include some or all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed
for a specific commodity class and storac�e arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems,
smoke vents, draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access
roads (CFC Chapter 23 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section J).
F-24. Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code
Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards (CFC
Chapter 23 and City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section J).
F-25. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or
aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or
any other hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire
Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 34 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F-26. The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a
Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report. A full
hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any
building storing or using hazardous materials (CFC Chapter 28 though 44, Appendix
Chapter 1 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F-27. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to
the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
F-28. If there are changes to underlying maps then prior to map recordation the applicant
shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County
standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information.
The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and
projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The
Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to
satisfaction of this condition.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PD-1. Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of
no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and
shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the
buildings utilizing lower level windows.
PD-2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to
deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder,
the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings.
PD-3. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height.
PD-4. All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex shall be energy saving and minimized
after hours of darkness and in compliance with the Title 24, Part 6, of the California
Code of Regulations.
PD-5. All exterior lighting to be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting
Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred.
PD-6. All exterior doors to have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above each door.
The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground
level, evenly dispersed.
PD-7. All exterior night lighting shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting
during hours of darkness.
PD-8. Applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This
order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from
businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, "All
California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto
malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability
during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public,
employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law
enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed
$1000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations
PD-9. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware
shall be commercial or institution grade.
PD-10. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-
hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP.
PD-11. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system
installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify
the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant
offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm
system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7.
PD-12. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-
lit, highly visible area, and installed with a"call-out only" feature to deter loitering. This
feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings.
PD-13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section
22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
PD-14. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures,
personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention
training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit.
PD-15. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in
the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a
thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for services. A decal is
also posted on the front entry of the business advising customers of the "Inkless Ink
Program" in use. If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the Police
Department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint.
PD-16. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime
Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective
use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime
and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this
concept are included as conditions below:
a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition
may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the
arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying
controlled space.
b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify
when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space.
c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where
there is good surveillance and access control.
d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a
location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users
due to observation and possible intervention.
e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of
natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the
users of the areas feel safer.
f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may
conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for
example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict.
g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk
for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance
and intervention.
h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal
users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention.
Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of
surveillance.
i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through
improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design
efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building.
PD-17. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime
Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department.
PD-18. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with all
guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines
associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the
Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and
owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be
served for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
PD-19. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police
Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506-6793.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PW-1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost
to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the
site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways,
improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the
project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
PW-2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
PW-3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
PW-4. All grading and improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent
projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on
standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
PW-5. The project shall include construction-phase pollution prevention controls into the
design of the project to prevent non-permitted runoff from discharging off site or
entering any storm drain system or receiving water.
PW-6. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be accepted by the City prior to the
initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil engineer
and include site design Best Management Practices (BMPs), source controls, and
treatment mechanisms.
PW-7. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative
Parcel Map No. 34711 (PA06-0103) as approved on August 17, 2006.
PW-8. All on-site drainage facilities shall be maintained by a private maintenance association
or property owner.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PW-9. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Consenration District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
e. Riverside County Health Department
f. Army Corps of Engineers
g. Fish and Game
PW-10. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and
private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
PW-11. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the
grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance
with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120.
PW-12. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
PW-13. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of liquefaction.
PW-14. The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also
analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific
recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or
upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access
easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the
developer.
PW-15. Construction-phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual,
and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
PW-16. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout
the duration of construction activities.
PW-17. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
PW-18. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
PW-19. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
PW-20. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on
adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
PW-21. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. This project shall
comply with Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code which may include
obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit
shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PW-22. Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be
observed:
a. Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard Number 207.
c. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400.
d. Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
e. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
f. Public street improvement plans shall include plans and profiles showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
g. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
PW-23. The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to
City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
a. Improve Calle Garisol (Collector Road Standards - 66' R/W) to include dedication of
half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street
improvements plus twelve feet, paving, ac berm, street lights, drainage facilities,
signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
b. Improve Aussie Lane (Local Road Standards - 60' R/W) to include dedication of
half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street
improvements plus twelve feet, paving, ac berm, street lights, drainage facilities,
signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer).
c. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections.
PW-24. The developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable
City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including
street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, drive approach, streetlights, signing, striping, sewer and domestic water
systems; undergrounding of proposed utility distribution lines; and storm drain facilities.
PW-25. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic
engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and
detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public
Works.
PW-26. A Signing and Striping Plan shall be designed by a registered civil engineer approved
by the Department of Public Works for Calle Girasol and Aussie Lane.
PW-27. All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and
reviewed by the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and approved by City
Council for dedication of the City where sidewalks meander through private property.
PW-28. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil
engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
PW-29. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent
property.
PW-30. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
PW-31. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
PW-32. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP
have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready
for immediate implementation.
PW-33. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive
written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water
District, or other affected agencies.
PW-34. Corner property line cut off shall be required per City of Temecula Standard No. 603A.
PW-35. All public improvements, including traffic signals, shall be constructed and completed
per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works.
PW-36. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works.
PW-37. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
V�'��1ZEZEN L�. W4LL �,�MS - 1995 MARICET STREET
Gcnera� Manager-CI�iel�Engineer � RIVERSIDE, CA92501
951.955.1200
FAX 951.788.9965
www.floodcontrol.co.riverside.ca.us
51180 6
� � � _ �.�;
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL � °~` � '_..' � �:�, ��'��'� (�
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT �
City of Temecula _
Planning Department � �::''
Post Oftice Box 9033 �
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: �-��� ��� �� � _,.
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: �� `�� ^ "`�' � � �
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The
District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard
reports for such cases. D�str�ct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest
to the District including Distr�ct Master Drainage Pian facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which
could be considered a logical component or extens�on of a master plan system, and District Area Dramage Plan fees
(development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and
safety or any other such �ssue:
No comment.
� This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of regional
interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or (arger in diameter or other facilities that could be
considered reg�onal in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Master
Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of suc aci ities on written re uest o t e City.
Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection wil� be required for
� District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
This project is located within the limits ofthe District's Y A �Y�► 2r�-ruA�sVAlle Area Drainage
Plan far which drainage fees have been adopted; applica e ees s ou e paid by cas ier s c ec or money order
only to the Flood Control District or City prior to �ssuance of grading permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate
in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit.
An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of
way or facilities. For further information, contact the District's encroachment permit section at 951.955.1266.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordat�on or other final approval should not be given until the City has
determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other �nformation required to meet FEMA requirements,
and should further reqwre that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading,
recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the Ciry should require the applicant to obtain a
Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the pro ect is exempt
from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required �om the local
California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit.
Very truly yours,
i'� •
ALE V. ANDERSON
Engineering Project Manager
c: Riverside County Planning Department Date: ��� �
Attn: Kathleen Browne
� .�•�
Ct_�:�f�1`I`� CaF F�IV�RSI�E � CO]NI1�11�1I`�`Y I--iEAL�'� AC�EI�1�Y
,- '' �� � � � ' � ���
.� �. �. �. . . . � . �
�������� �
February 9, 2010
i �.�:� :� � 2�J�0
City of Temecula �� - ���`�
Planning Department
Attn: Eric Jones Planner
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula CA 92589-9033
SUSJECT: PA09-0061 — HINGDOM HALL OF JEI30VAH'S WITNESSES
31640 CALLE GIRASOL, TEMECULA, CA
Dear Mr. Jones:
The Deparhnent of Environmental Health (DEH) has reviewed the application for the
above project and offers the following comments:
POTABLE WATER SERVICE — RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
This project is proposing Rancho California Water District (RCWD) potable water
service only. It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to
obtain potable water service are met with RCWD, as well as, all other applicable
agencies. Please note that any existing well(s) may have to be abandoned or removed
prior to connecting to RCWD potable water service at their discretion. Any well removal
or abandonment activity must be conducted under permit with DEH.
DEH CLEARANCE IS P.EQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE
DEH will accept for review the proposed use of an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System
(OWTS) for this project based on ESI Soils Percolation Report Project#08-0711-SP dated
August 7, 2008. It should be noted that the aggregate daily wastewater flows generated
for this project must not exceed 3000 �allons per dav.
Upon building submittal, the applicant must submit to DEH for review at least three
copies of detailed contoured plot plans wet stamped and signed by the Professional of
Record (ESI) and drawn to an appropriate scale showing the location of all applicable
detail as required in the DEH Technical Guidance Manual.
,`
If grading is proposed, the applicant must show all pertinent detail on scaled Precise
Grading Plans wet stamped and signed by the Professional of Record (ESI). Any
significant grading at the proposed OWTS area may require further soils percolation
testing and/or engineering. _ __ _ ___
�.ae�u� 4�e�fco-e�cement Fegency •!?0. Bou 1280, Riverside, CA 92502-1280 •(904J 955-8982 ^ FAX (909) 781-9653 • 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Floor, Riverside, CA 925Q1
�.�4<a. °��� �aa� "�lc�t�a �sea�iaz��x:aaq ^ P0. E�c;x 12f?6, Riv�r�ide, CP: 9250?.-12Q6 0(9Q91 955-898Q • FAX (409) 955-8903 ° 4080 [_emon Street, 2nd Fioor, Riverside, CA 97�;01
Eric Jones, Planner
City of Temecula
February 9, 2010
A floor plan of the proposed structure showing all proposed plumbing fixtures including
information regarding all building's final occupancy schedule must also be submitted to
DEH for review to ensure proper septic tank sizing.
DEH staff will conduct an onsite evaluation to verify information on the submitted plans
and observe water levels in the groundwater detection boring. It is the responsibility of
the applicant to ensure that the groundwater detection boring (4 inch perforated pipe
installed at least 10 feet below the proposed leach line trench bottom) remains onsite and
intact. Please note that if groundwater encroachment is observed, further engineering, as
well as, Regional Water Quality Control Board Clearance may be required.
Moreover, the applicant must clearly identify the job property with a durable placard
specifying the site address or Assessor's Parcel Number. All property corners must be
clearly staked or marked.
FOR ANY PROPOSED PUBLIC FOOD FACILITY / OPERATIONS
A total of three (3) complete sets of plans for each food establishment are needed
including a fixture schedule, a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure
compliance with current Local and State Regulations. For any questions regarding public
food facility requirements, please contact:
• Department of Environmental Health, District Environmental Services, Murrieta
38740 Sky Canyon Drive. Suite A, Murrieta CA 92563
TeL (951) 461-0284.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLING AND STORAGE
The facility may require a business emergency plan for the storage of hazardous materials
greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials
or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional
environmental health issues, the Hazardous Materials Management Division reserves the
right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please
contact the Hazardous Materials Management Division, at (951) 358-5055 for any
additional requirements.
2
Eric Jones, Planner
City of Temecula
February 9, 2010
If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at (951) 955-8980.
Sinc�'rel ,
, �� ; � ��:..
� �
� � --� _
� �..�
� `'�a
Michael Mistica, R.E.H.S.
Environmental Health Specialist IV
3
_
_. ..---------- ---- ----------- ---__--------------- - -- ----- — ---- ------------- -�
,
�/ � � I
�: � :.-� "; Y' �W �� �.�'.�`
,I � �-�� - � -� � �,� �`�=�
� � � �,�,..,, a � ��a
�...�,��....,. K,�»..,.,.,.,,
� �
� March 10, 2009 �A� � � ����
I �
��
� � �
I Project Planner
i City of Temecula
� Planning Department
I
� t������{�������������� Post Office Box 9033
; °'a��➢F °'. "�a;'� Temecula, CA 92589-9033
i r���,:,�<��„�
! iisa G. [�errnxn
: � ��;��. ,�:��,���,� SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
; s��:�,,,�:, r,. �:E�,<�«a DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH CONDITIONAL USE �
I, ��,�ri �;. «���e PERMIT - KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES I
.�,:,�,: G��. _�<,:�� PARCEL 1V0. 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 34711; APN 957-120-
I = "� S `'� p "'� f '` ` f "�' t ��' 019 [J. VAN HAASTERJ
� R'ill:um H'. }'lumnier
� To Whom It May Concern: �
� ,
i %�in<<>,:.
n ,,,�� fi ,,. ::x y �,, iie Please be advised that the above-referenced project/property is located within the
i ,:::,��:��:,��:������� service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject
� F'hitl9p S.. Yonc�.5. cN:. project/property fronts an existing 8-inch diameter water pipeline (1610 Pressure �
I 1.�eict¢int. C;�:nr,ral Marul;ur i
� ���,:��,��r�., Zone) within Calle Girasol. Please note that the subject area is ultimately
� �=���r� k. ���u�ei programmed to be serviced from the 1485 Pressure Zone, which will result in
i (,rl,���_u���si�PiE�����1:,;
; lower water service pressures.
�\�icis•�x- %.. yieli±:tt��', {'.��.
i :�:'ll�i�? i.IiS(:I�l. �.I'ir!i:l:`t'!�
' .,E.,�Y�, �:�. -ar,r::t.r�,,,� Water service to the subject project/property does not currently exist. Additions
� '`"'"`�'�`�'°��"""' ""'`°'� or moditications to water service an are subject to the Rules and
i """+" `''. �'a�"� Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the
i !)I�t�it:L:i;�c.�i���L'nt'V
i c.. M���1,�e� �:�w���t completion of financial arrangements between RC WD and the property owner.
�
j i3e�;t Gest S Krieger LLf'
� �",""' �`�°""'°'' Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on-site
' wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if
j any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing �
� of the subject project/property development relative to water supply
i shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage �
; Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances).
' As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a
; determination of existing water system capability, based upon project-specitic
I demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed
i water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire
� protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an
� assessment of project-specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate
� water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation.
�
�
i
��
�
� 09\CW:Im01 I \F450\FEG _ J
' ----- ---___------
_.._--- ---- -- ---- — --- ---- _ -- __ ------..--- ------- ---- ------
�_ .__.. ---------- -
Ranchc California Water 1?ista•ict
-0213;� 6Vin,hr.,tr.;r F1nud ^ F Offico Box 901 [= Temeciiln, C;aliliu�niti 9ZfiR�-9017 '(951) 29(i-6f300 • I�AX 19511'L96-(i8G0
www.ranchowtil.��r.r.om
( Letter to Project Planner/C� . �f Temecula __ ��
� I
j March 10, 2009 �
Page Two -
Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern
Municipal Water District. ;
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering �
Services Representative at this office at (951) 296-6900.
� Sincerely, �
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
�:
i i �
�, , i... , _l?i,�'� ,,,� .
b
Corey F. Wallace, P.E.
Engineering Manager
cc: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
Pete Muserelli, Engineering Project Coordinator
Joseph Van Haaster, Applicant
�
,
i
�
i
i
�
�
i I
�
�
�
�
! J i
i � �
I oy�cw:i�»oi iu�aso�rt:��.� �
� _ ...._ _.. .-- ----- -----='
_ . ---- - --_
_ __.._ — _ _ ___ __-
!i. � h�. L.�� 1�i t til i Y)ftiCuc.t
. !_�lrini��. .�.� h��ar, .:st.l�tl,� �.rnN.,li �:�n���l�.l't )0!i + 1:3�1)L1(i-69u0 • FA.=>�9�
.. H �v.r.ine6r.�rriLc:�.rur.i
INITIAL STUDY
City of Temecula
- Community Development
Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration -
PROJECT: Jehovah Witness Kingdom Hall
APPLICANT: Mr. Joseph Van Haster
LOCATION: Generally Located on the southeast corner Aussie Avenue and Calle Girasol
City of Temecula, Counry of Riverside
DESCRIPTION: A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit (PA09-0061) to construct
and operate an 8,294 square foot religious institution (Kingdom Hall for the
Jehovah Witness Congregation) on 2.32 acres within the Very Low (VL)
residential zoning district.
The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described
above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and
pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been
determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon
the environment. As a result, the Planning Director intends to adopt a Negative Declaration for this
project.
The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment
are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached to this
Notice and will be included as part of the Negative Declaration for this project.
The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is May 25, 2010 _to June 23,
2010. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person
listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033.
City Hall is located at 43200 Business Park Drive.
The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through:
�The Local Newspaper ❑Posting the Site ❑Notice to Adjacent Property Owners
If you need additional information any questions concerning this project, please contact Eric
Jones, Assistant Planner at 506-51 5.
�
Prepared by: - - ASSis�-f �����r _ _
i ure) (Title)
_ .. _. _ _ _ _ _
_ _. __ .. __ _. . _ ___ _ -
_. ._. _ _ _. _
_ _. _. _ _. _ __ _ _ _. ___. _...
__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_. _ _ _
_ __ _ _ _ _ City of Temecula _
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
_ _
__ _ Environmentai Checkiist
-Pco'ect Title - -- -- - - - Jehovah Witness Kin dom Hall - - - - -
Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number Eric Jones, Case Planner
951 506-5115
Project Location Generally located on the southeast corner of Aussie Avenue and
Calle Girasol
Project Sponsor's Name and Address Mr. Joseph Van Haster, 41221 Via Anita
Temecula, CA. 92592
General Plan Designation Very Low Residential (VL
Zonin Ve Low Residential VL
Description of Project A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit (PA09-0061) to
construct and operate an 8,294 square foot religious institution
(Kingdom Hall for the Jehovah Witness Congregation) on 2.32 acres
within the Ve Low VL residential zonin district.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The project is proposed to be located on a vacant 2.32 acre parcel in
the Very Low (VL) residential District within the City of Temecula.
The proposed project also contains a blue line stream on its eastern
edge. The immediately surrounding parcels abutting the site to the
north and east are also zoned Very Low residential. Calle Girasol
boarders the parcel to the west and south with a public park and
more Very Low residential beyond. The adjacent residentially zoned
arcels each contain existin dwellin s.
Other pukilic agencies whose approval United States Army Corp. of Engineers (USACOE), California
is required Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), Western Riverside Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP
_ __ _
_ . _
_
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ . _. _ _ .. _ . _ _ .. _
_ _.
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _._ _ _ _ .._._ ___
_ _
. _.
. _. _. _ _.__ _ __ _. . __. ___ _. _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ __
_: _ _ ..._ _ . . . � __. . __ : __ __ _:.:
.
_ __
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
_
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a"Potentially Significant ImpacY' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics Mineral Resources
A riculture and Forest Resources Noise
Air Qualit Po ulation and Housin
Biolo ical Resources Public Services
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation
Cultural Resources Trans ortation and Traffic
Geolo and Soils Utilities and Service S stems
Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandato Findin s of Si nificance
H drolo and Water Qualit None
Land Use and Plannin
Determination
(To be completed by the lead agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared.
X I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the ro'ect ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared:
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a"potentially significant impacY' or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal ze onl the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or .NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired.
_ _
� _ __ 5-��- lu
Signature Date
_
Eric Jones_ _ _ _ . _ -- - Citv of Temecula _ .
Frinted Name For
_ _
_ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _
_ _. . _._ _ _ . _ _ 2 _ . _ _ _ __
_ _ _
_
f �� I ���i..� ��.
I �p �C � fC
�' I �
V f �
, \) q
; � ' e� °�
u � ` �_
�r t�� '
. � ,"v
�� � N
;°�'��a=a:r� �,�r=�aa-te� �-- �rr..,_m:�u7,' . � m _
��� '�► � �,�i� ��`�'9" 1
.;� /� � �re',
������M► r , q � . � +� ��
�, '' � � " .,��'�'`'.�i►° ,�,:�r" - a �� : `
, :� �.z o:,n . � �;� ',��+Mi � ,�' �' � '
( �,,,� ' �� ��'w1.AA�1�M' " � �1►
`' �� '� '�'* 1►`'��►I/ �
� � Y �j
�. � .,�r �►;� �1►'�►+t1►p al�
, • A����Aii ���il�`A 4i � �n �j�
'° ' �''!!�- '°�:�� t
♦ � '� ' � � �� �� m /
�►,�, ,_ 4, , �►�, ��
��n a "•�mu����� � '�� m
� r a.,. •,���in��i��� � �' m ,. �,�,,. �
1111i - °r '� JII����� ��
. `� �� �
nn _� � � �iiii�u��� �� `� ° , `°�� � ��
♦ ♦
�w � ° ""'�•. �m��nr ' ♦ �� � ��� v�r` °.. ��
� � ��� ��� � � a a 4
���� � � ' A� �° .
�. � Q . .�'a► `� �'
� � , o ��� �n �' ,�.,. ,,�,� s ��,►� �' �, ..,,,,
���.�' v►—m � � "° uw q �► i�'° �ir ♦ ♦ . � ' �►
■.� � -- �r ��,� .�'• � r �'��;� ,�► � �'
�n - �s�° r• '� .. �,�,`•o�tr r� � �
� b•.�' flltflllN ,� '.�` T `���► n
� � � � `�� ��"!��►��.r,�, n��` r�'�►
� "" � � � `111iN���11�� �` ' �4f"'�i�►�� �� ,�' � � �' .
:��...) . �=��+umm���°� � .: ..._ +'�.S�Q.. _,� j ��.� � ��. � ,a�a�,_'�"" �,�,
��►, e, ��; , � ll1 �+�►�ri"�: R �` �r � � � " �
.-s .. ;, � �IflIM1i� �.. �,�11�"�, ,-,•,aa.i'ts *r�t�� � # � �� ° �
�.. r1/�/111� !' ."'.�1�l11►�►.. " � ��
�'�� '�►�,� :� •
11 �� `�w/111l1 � � cs �' : ,��i�1tI1 ' �-��1� �w� �� �" u
� � a/6i111A►I � �� � a��c . +'� � � �
a� '`•, �' -� � ;, rv►���r`►`o'�ro � ��' � �``��l� � �
� � �� 1 ���;��� �' � � ��,,�i"�I��"
� e +
� ����`���� �e�L ��� �� �
�^, � ����� ������
� � �
o _ r� � ■ .�� `: ��, �'� rr
�►��, a .� ► �.. - . - � i1/� .�/��,���, v����► ,
,.� ,. �►''� � � ,
� ,,� .� _ ��'� �f:'� � N
� '�1�1 11111�1. .° �/11111 � � ��
,,,a ,� . • _ � _ ��`r�N��� �'.1 �, 1► � �i�''�
- -- . ���._ .1t �Iliilll� ...! , ,������������'�1',�; '�
� � ,r�r � �
.. , n _ ��r� �►►�
w�B '�i .° *MIr 1 U/���' == =�lt== =�` .��.!'�s�. .�.►.� ssr �.r..a
_ _
_ __ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _. __. _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. .
1. AESTHETICS. Wouid the project:
Potentially ,
r Potentialiy,� ,: Significant Unless ' less 7han ." '
i Issues and Supporting Info�mation Sources ; Significant Mitigation Significant ,,,:No
`;;� �m act '��:`�Incor o�ateci - Impact'� Im act � ? �
a Have a substantial adve�se effect on a scenic vista? X
b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not X
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings- - - -
_. _
within a state scenic hi hwa ?
c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality X
of the site and its surroundin s?
d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would X
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? -
Comments:
1.a. No Impact: The project will have no impact on a scenic vista. The proposed one-story, 8,294 square
foot religious facility is located on the southeast corner of Aussie Avenue and Calle Girasol. The Community
Design Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic view sheds throughout the
City to ensure all new public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic
resources. According to the General Plan Community Design Plan Exhibit on page CD-5, the subject property
has not been identified as a viewshed, nor is the project located in close proximity to an identified viewshed_
Therefore, no scenic vistas or identified viewsheds will be affected by the development of the proposed project.
1.b. No Impact: The proposed project will not substantially damage scenic resources including trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. The proposed project site does not contain
any scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings or historical buildings. The proposed project is also not
located near a State scenic highway.
1.c. Less than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site or quality of its surroundings. The 2.32 acre project site is currently vacant. However, the
project site is surrounded by single-family homes on Very Low residential zoned parcels as well as a public
park located immediately across Calle Girasol. The project has been designed to integrate architecturally with
the surrounding residential area with the main structure resembling a small farm house. In addition, a split rail
fence will be included around the property. These features are consistent with development within the Nicolas
Valley region.
1.d. Less than Significant Impact: The project will create a new source of light glare; however, the impact
is not anticipated to be significant enough to adversely impact the daytime or nighftime views in the area. The
proposed site is surrounded by parcels with residential development. The City of Temecula requires that all
new developments comply with the Mount Palomar Light Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires
that all lighting sources be shielded and directed downward to avoid glare on adjacent properties and ensure
low levels of glare in the sky. Lighting design will be addressed during the plan check process, prior to the
issuance of any building permits for the new religious facility. Lighting issues will also be addressed during the _
construction and inspection phase of the project. Because the project will be required to be in compliance with
Ordinance 655, it will not adversely affect the day or nighttime views or create substantial light or glare,
_ _ - resulting in a less.than significant impact _ _ - - - -
_ _
_.__ __ _
_ _ _
_ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _. _
_ _
__ _ _
__ _: _ 3 _ _ __ __
_
_
_
_ _.. _ __ _ .._
__ __........ _ _ _
2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural -
resources are significanf environmental effects, lead agencies may refer fo the California =
_
Agricultural Land Evaluation,and Site Assessment Model _(1997) prepared by_the_California _._
Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and
_ farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timbe.rland, are_
significant environmental effects; lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest
land, including the Forest.and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment
Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
� r ,;, - , j ,e i Potentially
'' , � y�� �z , X �;� � r PotenUally Sigrnficant.Unless L'ess Than:
� ' Issues`�and Supporting�lnformation Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No
. �.. : �` `� �� r'�+ � ; ,., t��,r,,. �, e,.. . Impact:` Incoc orated ;;;Impact . Im act :
a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of X
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuanf to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to
non-a ricultural use?
b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a X
Williamson Act contract?
c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest X
land (as defined in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104 ?
d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land X
to non-forest use
e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, X
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non-forest use?
Comments:
2.a.e. No Impact: The proposed project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of
Statewide Importance, to a non-agricultural use. According to the City of Temecuta General Plan, the project
site does not contain any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore,
_
the construction and operation of the project will not have any impacts to these types of farmland. However,
the General Plan does note that the project site and many surrounding properties contain Farmland of Local
Importance. fVlany of these adjacent properties contain existing single-family dwellings and are not used for
farmland. Additionally, the project site does not contain existing farmland, or forestland, nor was the site
intended to.be used for agricultural or foresting purposes. _. _
2.b. No Impact: The project site is zoned Very Low (VL) residential. This zoning designation does allow for
_
agricultural uses provided they are consistent.with all Development.Code requicements._ However, agricultural
uses are not planned for this property. In addition, the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract per:
the General Flan__ - _: . _ _ _ _ _ _..
_ _ _ . _ _. _._. - - _ _ .
_
_ _ _.._..._ ..... _ 4 _ . _. _ . _ _.
_
2.c.d. No Impact: The project locafion is not suitable for forest and/or timberland uses as defined by the
_._ _ _ _ _
Public Resources and Governmenf Codes. Forest land is defined as land that can support 10 percent native
tree cover of any species; including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of
one .or more forest resources i�cluding tim6er, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversify, water quality,
_ recreation and other public benefits. The proposed project:site is zoned Very L.ow (VL}residential and not as a_.
Timberland Production Zone as defined by Section 51104(g) of the Govemment Code. As such, the parcel
and sucrounding area are intended-to be developed with detached single-family homes and are therefore not
available to grow trees commercially as required by the timberland definition contained in Section 4526 of the
Public Resources Code. In atldition, forest land does not exist on the parcel or in the immediate area. No
_ _ _
impact is expected. _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _ _ _
_ __ _ __ _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _._ __. __... _ _
__ _ _ _ _
__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _
_ _ . _ _ _. . _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ ___ . _ __ _ __ .
: _ _ _ 5 __ __ _ __ _
_ _ __ _
_
_ _.
_ _ _
3. _ AIR QUALITY. Where available, the. significance criteria established by the_ applicable air __
- quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the
-_ following determinations. Would the pcojecf:
_
�� : r .. ; ! ° -tiX.� .' - �: � � t t ' �'. P �18f1i I� � { $ k Pficant Un - , r �._ . . .
o ia y, ign less Less Than
�: , , . . Issue"s and SuppoRing Informatwn Sou�ces SigrnficaM : 'C � `MiGgahon � Sigrnficant No
: >. , ' .
s .., . ,. :� . . : , .: ,..;� .. _�� .r . . .... , <r., ... . , �,� ., . ,r: ��Irti act . F�,Inco orated,�'�� .. ..alnri act. �' ��"�:Im eck��, .
.a. ,. .
,
a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X
air qualit plan? .
_
b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X
to an existin or pro'ected air qualit violation?
c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any X
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable fedecal or sfate ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone recursors ?
d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X
concentrations?
e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X
of eo le?
Comments:
3.a. No Impact: The proposed religious facility is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The
South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
are the responsible agencies for preparing the Air Quality Management Plan for the SCAB. The proposed
project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Managemenf Plan
(AQMP). The proposed project is subject to the requirements of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and SCAQMD. A project is deemed inconsistent with air
quality plans if it results in population and/or employment growth that exceed growth estimates in the
applicable air quality plan. The proposed project does not include any residential development, housing, or
large local or regional employment centers and would not result in significant population or employment
growth. Thus, the proposed project would result in no impact with respect to the implementation of the
SCAQMD's AQMP.
3.b. Less than Significant Impact: Air quality impacts may occur during site preparation, grading, and
construction activities required for implementation of the proposed land use. Major sources of emissions
during construction include exhaust emissions generated during,site preparation, grading; and the subsequent
construction of the structures, as well as fug�tive dust generated as a result of soil and material disturbance
during site preparation and grading excavation activities. The emission of reactive organic during
site paving and painting of the structures may also occur.
Project air quality impacts were evaluated in accord with the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) guidelines for identifying any potential adverse air quality impacts as .required by the California
Environmental- Quality Act (CEQA) an analysis was performed using the California Air Resources Board
(CARB) approved URBEMIS 2007 Model to determine if SCAQMD air quality significance ttiresholds would be
exceeded. The below table presents the results : of the unmitigated contaminates that will be generated as a
--- result of the project during the summer and winter months: -Aceording to the-data will be less
than the significance thresholds established by SCAQMD. -
_ __ _ __ ._ __ . _ _ _ .. _ . ..__ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ . _ _ .
_ _ _ _ _. _ _
_ ___ _ __ _ 6 _. _ _ _
_ . ._.._ _ _ _
__ ..___. _.. _
Summer Emissions
_ .._. _ _
_ _ .. . ... ___ _ .... . __ . _ _ .. _ _ _. _ __. _
_ _
GONS7Rt�CTEf)F1 �hfISSiON ESTIMIATES
_
_
RQC's � r�'. - PI,�f C1 �*.tsi �A14 Exha�si . Pl.11�? PPA�_5 Clust P1. �r ��hauct PM�.�
_..
_
2D1(3 TOTA#..S (last�ay ufiEn�egated} 36.42 42.79 ZZ.9A t5.4i 2.43 17_54 3_Z�' 2_24 5:92
SignificanaeThreshoEd . 9QQ.Q9 5�.fl� t5�_�7G 5�.��'
_
Exceed Signiticance? GIO R14 NO ►dQ
_ .. . .. . . _ . _ . _
RRERSOURGEEMlSSiQNESTiMATES _ _.
RdG NOx Gfl Pt�.41{3 PI412:5
'a�`.TIa�S (UrsP�ay. vnmiEigafe�) G.18 D.1� t_83 4.01 4.€IS
OPERATIOpdAt (VEHI�tEJ EMI�S[01J ES7t�s7ATES.
ft4G NOx CO PR�.S10 PM?.5
�t3TALS �UasJday, unmifigaEe�} f}.4� @.79 �:$7 U.£]7 fl.414
Significance Threshald �5_Okl 55L_D9 t5mA� �5.�0
Exceed Signi�cance? Na NO Pt0 NO
SilM OF AREA SOUAC� A[ID LIPERRTi{)NAL EA4l5§I€?id ESTtMATES
R4G �JOx GO P�.tfU Rt�i2.5
�fiTi4�S jltrs.��i�g. unmitig�ted) 4_�4 �.6� 7:�4 U.fl� t1.E15
Significance Threshold 35.� 55�.afl 11D.94 �5.0�
Exceed Signifcance? NQ NO I�f6 NO
Winter Emissions
C�NSTi2UCT1Q�t EMES51fiFt ESTtMATES
E20{'i Wdr. CO Ptvlid Dust Ptt!'1'.9 Pt4t1ES F'P�1'2..Fr Dust P:M2.� P�d2:5
Exhaust E�avs!
2�itfl TC?TAL5 (ibs,`day urzm�t:g�:�d) 38_42 4i_79 22:68 t5.�i4 2_43 17.:ri 3�2 ? 24 5_t8
�ignificance Threshold tfl§]_iF0 5��.0�1 15G���7 55.UU
Excecd Signifoance? Nfl MO NQ N()
AFtEA SOilRCE FkfISS#Ot� ESTIMATES
� RUG NOx GO Ph�96 Pf.92.5 -
Tt3TALS(16stday.urtm8tiga.ed) Q.07 0.10 OA� fl.4D 0.[34l
t}PERATIQNAL {YEEIlCLE) Etr�lSSI(}M ESTI{WAiEB
_ RC1Ci _ f�iOx CCr P69t@ P?42.5
aG3kL5 jlbsf�ay, �nm:tigafedj 0.98 (F.92 5.d2 �_4i �.4�1
Segnif"ccaneeThreshc+ld tO13.0'J 55[3.fl0 i5�1.6Q 5�.GD
Exac�d Signifecance? M€} NO NO MO
- . . _ . . ..
SURA flF AREA SflURGE AND OPERPITIONAL EMISSIC}N ES7IA�IATES
Rflfi t}Qx GO Pt.4 eL� P'i.42.5
SGTfcLS (IE+sl�y. uramifsgafed} 0.53 7.02 5.70 �.0? U.(�
. ._ _ ____._ . . .... .. _.. _. _ _ . _..._ ...._ __. .._ _ _ _... .. .. . _ .. . _ _. ... .. . __ _. .
Si�ynif�canc� Threshok! _ 1��:DJ 55Q.�1� . ��7.C#C 55.CrD.
Exceed Signi�cance? . NO AJO NO NO
_ __ _ . , _ . . . _. _ . .. _. . _ .. _ _ _ . . . . _ _ .. . _ _._ _
_. _ _ _
_...... ... _ _: _.. _. ._ _.. ., ,._ _. __ _ _... _ _ . _ ..
_ __ _ _ _ __ . _. _ _ _. _
_... __.. __ ......... . .. ..� .. . . _. _ __
_
_.
_
_...
3.c. Less than Significant Impact: CEQA Guidelines Seefion 15064 (h)(3) stipulates fhat for an impact
_. _.. .
_ involving a resource that is addressed by an approved plan._or mitigation program, the lead agency may _
determine that a projecYs incremental contribution is not eumulatively considerable if-the project complies with
the adopted plan or prograrn. In addressing cumulative effects for air quality, the SCAQMD Air Quality
Management Plan is the most appropriate document to use: because it set forth comprehensive programs that .
will lead the South Coast Air Basin, including the project area into compliance with all federal and state air
-quality standards. It also utilizes con#rol. measuces and related emission -reduction estimates based upon -
emissions projections for a future development scenario derived from land use; population, and employment
characteristics defined in consultation with focal governments. Because the proposed project is in
_
conformance with the AQMP and the project is not significanf on an individual basis, it is appropciate -to
conclude that the project's incremental contribution to criteria pollutant emissions is not cumulatively
considerable. Therefore the project's incremental contribution to criteria pollutant emissions is not anticipated
to result in a cumulatively considerable increase, and a less than significant impact will occur.
3.d. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigatiorr Incorporated: Sensitive receptors are land uses such as
residences, schools, daycare centers, medical and recreational facilities that are more susceptible to the
effects of air pollution than are the general population. The nearest sensitive receptors are the site itself and
the adjacent residential properties. These adjacent uses are located more than 25 meters from the proposed
project site.
Short term construction related air quality impacts are expected to occur during the development of the site.
These short term impacts may be generated by soil disturbances and equipment exhaust. With the prevailing
west to east winds, several residential units will be downwind of on-site construction activities. Any potential
air quality impact during construction can be minimized by the combination of mandatory control programs.
The applicant is required to comply with the required mitigation measures outlined below and a less than
significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project with mitigation.
Required Mitigation
Construction Practices
• Use of Best Available Control Measures pursuant to Air Quality Management District guidelines for
PM10 and for diesel equipment exhaust and during atl grading activities.
• Water all active construction areas at least twice daily.
• Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
� Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas.
_
� Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public
roadway.
• Cover or water fwice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material.
_ _ _
_ __
• Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph.
---• Hydroseed oc otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive foc than 96 hours after __.
clearing is completed. - -
-. _. __ _ _ _ .
• Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion.
_
_ _.. . __ _ _ _ _ .
__ _. _._ - _ _ _ -
._ _ _ __ __ __. . _ 8 _ __ __ _
_ _ _
_ _
_. _
_. _ _ _
_.. . _ .. . _ _
• Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak
_ ... . . _ _ . _ _ _. . _.. _
working order.
__ . _ _ _ _ ._ . .. . _ _
• Limit allowable 'idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
_ _
_
_
• Limit lane closures to off-peak travel-periods� - -- - -
- • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways - -- - - - -_ _ _
• Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site.
_ _ . _.
• Wash or sweep away access points daily.
• Sandbag construction sites for erosion control.
_
With the required mitigation measures specified above, no SCAQMD emission threshold will be exceeded
during construction or operation of the proposed project. Thus, the air quality impacts from the development
under this mitigation scenario are anticipated to be less than significant.
3:e. No Impact: During construction the proposed project will contain operations that will produce odors
associated with equipment and materials. The site is located within the vicinity of sensitive receptors, including
single-family homes and a City park. These uses are located further than 25 meters away. In addition, the
odors associated with this type project are normally not considered so offensive as to cause sensitive
receptors to become adversely affected. Diesel fuel combustion odors from construction equipment, operation
equipment, and new asphalt paving fall into this category. Both based on the short-term of the emissions and
the characteristics of these emissions, no significanf odor impacts are anticipated to result from implementing
the proposed project.
_. _
_. . : . . ._ . _ _ _ : _ . . . . _ _ .. .
- _ _ .. .. _._ . __ - _. . .
_ _ ..._ _
_ __ _ _ __ 9 _ _ _
. _ _
_ _ _ __.
_ _ __ _ ___
_.._. _ _ _ _._ _ .. ,.. . ...
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
_ _.
,� a � r � � fla � � � �c � � s Potentially .: ;
;' y��4 � `� �: �ti� ; ,,, ; .�� � � �� Potent�ally� V SigrnficantUnless LessThan "
: ;� 4 1 Issues and Supportmg"Informatio� Sources µ Signficant , MiUgation, : Significant ; No '
+
i �. , . ..�.a . . . •„ ..., ' . - . � �, , --'�-�, ` _'w � .. . , ,, .�. .,���� ��.� �linpact " inoor orated-.? Im� act , ,.ImpacY �
,. ., .
_ _ _ __._ . ._
a Hav.e a substantial adverse effect, either di�ecfly or X
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in -
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat X
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected X
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interru tion, or other means?
d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native X
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites?
e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting X
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat X
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
Comments:
4.a. Potentially Signi�cant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The Western Burrowing Owl and ten other
sensitive species were identified as possibly present on or in the vicinity of the proposed project. However, .
suitable habitat for these eleven species is not present on the proposed project site. In addition, Burrowing
Owls or_signs of Burrowing Owls were not observed on the site during a study performed by Brian F. Smith and
Associates. The opportunity for Burrowing Owls inhabiting the site at a future date remains low since the
project site only consists of low quality habitat for the owl. Thus, a less than significant impact for the project is
expected with mitigation.
Required Mitigation
The followinq actions shall be taken to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive bioloqical resources:
__ _ _. __ _ _ _ _ __.__
• A 30-day Burrowing Owl Pre-construction Survey shall be conducted prior to any ground disturbing
- - activity: 1f burrowing owls are found on the site! the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Seryice shall be consulted _
regarding reloeation of the owls: Relocation may only occur during #he non-breeding season.
_
Alternatively, pre-construction surveys may be conducted at five-day intervals until three consecutive
__ surveys fail to find owls on the site. _ _ _ _. __ _
_ . . _ _ _. _ . ..
_ _ _ _ _ . __ �� _ _ _
_._ _ _ _ _ .. .
_ . _ _ _ _..... ...
� A 25-foot buffer will be established around the riverine/ciparian acea -to protect the area from
development or other disturbance or a Determination of Biological Equivalent oc Superior Protection
(DBESP) shall be completed. A: DBESP was completed on February 3 2010. The results of this study
_ _concluded #hat fhe project will not restrict or significantly divert flows in the waterway.
, .
-- During construction the-riparian/riverine area as deterrnined by the jurisdictionat delineation and the 25- -
foot buffer will be fenced with orange vinyl construction barrier material to insure there are no accidental
intrusions into the area. Placement of fencing shall be under the direction of a qualified biologist and
_
- - will remain in place until all construction is completed. During construction the fence will be regularly
inspected by the project biologist to insure its integrity. This condition will be incorporated into the
grading plans.
• The riverine/riparian area as determined by a jurisdictional delineation shall be set aside in a
conservation easement and conveyed to an appropriate agency fo� management. If an agency cannot
be found to manage the property, restrictions preventing any development of the riparian/riverine will be
included in the deed for the property. �
• The boundary of the riparian/riverine buffer as determined by jurisdictional delineation will be fenced in
- a manner that will allow wildlife access but will minimize intrusion by humans and domestic animals.
The fencing will be included on construction plans. Maintenance of the fencing will be included in the
deed restricfions.
• When designing, installing, and maintaining landscaping, property owners will not use any of the
invasive species listed on Table 6.2, Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP. This condition will be incorporated
into landscaping plans and deed restrictions.
• All outside lighting will be of low wattage and shielded, directing light downward, onto the property and
away from the riparian/riverine area. This condition will be made part of construction plans for all
facilities erected on the property.
4.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, a po�tion of the
project site is located in a riparian biological area (Sensitive Habitats — Figure 5-3). This information was
confirmed by a Habitat Assessment conducted by Brian F. Smith and Associates, Inc. dated June 25, 2009.
Riparian/Riverine areas are lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent
vegetation, or emergent mosses and lichens, which occur close to, or which depend upon, soil moisture from a
nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh water flow during all or a portion of the year. A watercourse
located near the eastern boarder of the property line meets the MSHCP criterion of "areas with fresh water flow
during all or a portion of the year." These water ways must be avoided or have proper mitigation in place if
intrusion is necessary. The waterway on the proposed project site is subject to infrequent seasonal run-off. In
addition, the site does not support riparian vegetation or aquatic life and therefore is not likely to fall unde� the
jurisdiction of the California Department of Fish and. Game as riparian area. However, the waterway is a
riparian/riverine area under the jurisdiction of the County of Riverside Environmental Programs Department.
As such, a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Protection (DBESP) was completed on
February 3, 2010. This report was required because of the gravity wall that is proposed for the project. The
_
- DBESP concluded that the proposed gravity wall will not restrict or significantly divert flows in the water-ways.
As a result, construction of the gravity `wall is equivalent to avoidance. A less than significant impact is
anticipated. _
_ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ . _ . .. _ _ ___
_ _.
4.c. No lmpact; The project sife does not contain federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404
_ _ _ _ _ _.
of the Clean Water Act. The waterway on tfie eastern boarder of the property was evaluated to defecmine the
- presenee of wetlands. - To be considered a wetland; a site must rneet three criteria: hydric soils; wetland
hydrology; and hydrophytic vegetation. ' Hydric soils are defined by the national Technical Committee as soils
_ _ _ _.. __ _ _ _ _
that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long- enough ducing the gcow season to --
.. . _
__ _... _.- ��. _
_ ._
_. _ _
develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of fhe soil. The soils associated with the site are not on the lisf
_. _ . _ _
_ of hydric soils for the State of California. Wetland hydrology is present when, under normal circumstances, the __:.
land surface is either inundated or the upper portion of the soil is saturated at a sufficient frequency and
= duration to=cceate anaerobic conditions: These conditions are also required in order for hydrophytic vegetation
to be present. There is no indication that soils::o� .the project site are inundated or saturated long enough _
during the growing season to promote hydric conditions or hydrophytic vegetation. Based on the absence of
hydric soils, wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation, there are no we#lands present on the project site.
The Habitat Assessmenfi also indicated that vemal pools and vernal pool species were not observed on the
project site: No impact will occur.
_ _
_
4.d. No Impact: Based upon existing conditions, the proposed project is not expected to have a significant
adverse impact on the wildlife movements in the surrounding area within established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Further, the project site is not
located within a Criteria Cell of the MSHCP Plan Area. Therefore, no HANS review is required. However, a
Habitat Assessment was conducted by Brian F: Smith and Associates to address at a minimum, the potential
habitat for Burrowing Owl in accordance with MSHCP guidelines. This assessment, dated June 25, 2009,
indicated tFiat suitable habitat for the owl was not found on the site nor is the site suitable to support habitat for
the owl. No impact is anticipated. .�
4.e. No Impact: The construction and development of the project will not conflict with any local ordinances
or policies as they relate to the protection of biological resources. The City of Temecula has recently adopted
a Heritage Tree Ordinance designed to protect certain species of trees within the City. However, no trees
designated in the ordinance where located on the subject property. The City of Temecula General Plan
outlines a number of policies which emphasize the interrelationship between the built and natural environment.
The General Plan recognizes the importance of conserving important biological habitat and protecting plant
and animal species of concern: As a result, the General Plan requires that development proposals identify
significant biological resources. The Biological Assessment that was completed for the proposed project site
did not identify any sensitive plant species, sensitive bird species, sensitive mammal species, sensitive reptite
or amphibian species on site. Additionally, a Burrowing Owl survey was completed to identify any potential
habitat which would assess the likelihood that Burrowing Owls would utilize the property. No habitat or
burrows were found on-site. No impact will occur.
4.f. No Impact: The proposed development of the project will not_conflict with the provisions of the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional plan which
focuses on the conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The
Plan's overall goal is to maintain a biological and ecological diversity within the rapidly urbanizing area. The
Plan Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres and includes the City of Temecula within its
boundaries. In considering the development of this site in the context of the MSHCP, it has been determined
that the project site is not located within MSHGP Criteria Cells (Southwest Area Plan — Su6unit 1 Murrieta
Creek). Since the project does not lie within a designated Criteria Cell, it is not required to undergo a Habitat
Acquisition Negotiation Strategy (HANS) and Joint Project Review application. No impact will occur.
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _. . _.. __._ _ ._ _ _ ._ __
_
_. . _ __ ... . ._ ... . _. _ - --.. _ . ......_ .... _ _ _ . _
_
_. _ _ _: _ _ _. . _
_ _.. . _ _ _ _ . _
_ _ _ __ _. 12 _ __ _ _. _
_
_ .
_.._. _ _. _. _. _...
___.. _ . _ _ _ _ _. _ __ . __.. .
5: CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
_
_ _
R ' , � a � ,; '; Potentially `
; � � � ` -? � PotenUali � Significant Unless Less Than , ` ``
y !
y �' Issues and Supporting`informatron Sources +� Sigrnficant ;� -MiUgation � Significant No =�
`€ ',r� ����lin act , ;` incor orated>> , .: Irn act, . - ,';Im act: , : �� �
� . .. . .. , .. ,.. . .. , .:, , ,,.. . . , �. .. . .
a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of ' X
a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significanee of X
__
an archaeolo ical resource ursuant to Section 15064.5?
c Directly or .indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or uni ue eolo ic feature?
d Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries? - -
Comments:
5.a.b. No Impact: "Historic Resources" as defined by CEQA Section 15064.5 are prehistoric and historic
resources that are assessed as being "significant", insofar as their evidentiary contents can be demonstrated
relevant to the established local, regional or national research domains, issues and questions. According to a
Phase 1 Archeological Report that was completed for the property in June of 2009, a cultural resources
records check conducted at the Eastern Information Center (of the California Historical Resources Information
System — CHRIS) was conducted. A pedestrian field investigation was also completed by walking parallel
transects spaced at five-meter intervals across the study area. Surface visibility varied from 25% to 100%
depending on the density of the low-lying vegetation. Meande�ing transects were employed where parallel
transects were impractical. The escarpments of the small drainage along the northeastern boundary were also
checked for any signs of buried archaeological deposits. Since no historical resources were encountered
during the investigation, no impact is anticipated as a result of the project.
5.c.d. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The study recommends no further
work in conjunction with cultural resources because no historical, cultural, archeological or paleontological
resources were observed on-site. However, the Phase I study does indicate that surface visibility during the
site inspection varied from 25% to 100% due to low-lying vegetation. As a result of the overlying vegetation,
certain types of archeological, paleontological, historical or cultural resources may not have been observed
during the field investigation. As a result, it cannot be determined with certainty that no cultural resources will
be impacted, or discovered during the ground disturbance, grading, grubbing, and other related construction
activities. According�y, the Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (Pechanga) in correspondence to staff
dated. March 17, 2009, has requested to be involved in the project and recommends the following mitigation
measures be incorporated into the project:
. _
Required Mitigation -
• Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project applicant/developer is required to enter into a
Tceatment Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. This Agreement will address the
- treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that- may be uncovered during --
_
constructioh as well as provisions for tri6al monitors.
--- --• Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians shall be allowed-to monitor all grading -
excavation and ground-ti�eaking activities, including further surveys; to be compensated by the project
-- applicant/developer. - The Pechanga - monitors will have the authority to temporarily stop and
redirect grading activities-to evaluate the significanee of any areheological resources discovered on the
_ _ _
property, in conjunction with the archeologist and the Lead Agency.
_: . _: _ _ _
_.. _... _ _ __ _....._. _...
_ . _ _ _ . _ __ _ _ _:__:. 13 _ _ _ : _ _ _ . _
_ _
_.
_ _
_.. _. _ _ - _ . . . _.. _.... _ . _. :. _ . . _ .
• If human remains are encountered, all activity shall stop and the County Corner must be notified
_ _ _ _ _.. ...... _ ..
immediately. All activity must cease until-the-County Corner has-determined -the-origin-and disposition
of said remains. The Corner shall determine if the remains are prehistoric, and shall notify the State
_. _
- Native American Heritage Commission if applicable. Further-actions shall be determined by the desires
_
of the Most.Likely Descendant. _ -
_. _..... _ __..........._ . _. _
, . . . . .
• The Landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of- all -resources including all Luiseno sacred items,
burial goods and all archeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the Pechanga Band of
Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition.
_
_ _
• All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided and preserved.
__
_
_ _
__
_.. _ _ __ _ _ . . _ _ _ __ __ ___ _ _ _ _ . . _ ..
__ _ . _._. _. . _ _-- _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _
_ _
_ __ _ .
_ _
_ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ .
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
__ __ _ _ _ _ _
14 _ __ _ _ .. .
_
_ _
_ _ _.
_
_ _ _ _ _ _. __
_
__.. _ _ _ . _. ..... . _ _ _
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
_ _. .
_
_ _
� > r ` Potent all � ; F
, �
` ' - r : y> wSign�ficanf less , x`Less Than
� PotenLail �
; � ,i Issues and Supportmg InformaUon Sources Significant { t MWgation �` :Signifcant � No
f �. _ } .,, .. ' �' " Im act ':=1nco � o�ated ; -Im act:' Im' act `
, ... . _�,. ,,,r n. , .
_ . ..
____. _ _..:..:... __ _ _ _ _. _ __...
a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, includin the risk of loss, in'u , or death involvin :
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the X -
_
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii Stron seismic round shakin ? X_
iii Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X
iv Landslides? X
b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of to soil? X
c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that X
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreadin , subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of X
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks
to life or ro ert ?
e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments:
6.a.i.ii. Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated: A Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive
Analysis was completed by Earth-Strata Inc., dated February 9, 2009. According to this analysis, the project is
proposed to be located within a seismically active region. As a result, significant ground shaking will likely
impact the site within the design life of the project. The geo►ogic structure of the entire southern California
area is dominated by northwest-trending faults associated with the San Andreas Fault system, which
accommodates for most of the right lateral movement associated with the relative motion between the Pacific
and North American tectonic plates. Known active faults within this system include the Newport-Inglewood,
Whittier-Elsinore, San Jacinto and San Andreas Faults.
__
No active faults traverse the project site and the site is not located within an Alquest-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zone. However, based on the review of regional geologic maps and the computer program (USGS 2002
Interactive Deaggregation), the Elsinore-Temecula Fault with an approximate source to site distance of 7
kilometers (4 miles) is the individual fault anticipated to produce the highest ground accelerations, with an
anticipated maximum modal magnitude of .6:8. Based on the data compiled during the preparation of the
__ _ _ _
Preliminary Geotechnical report, it has been dete�mined that the potential for surface rupture to adversely
impact the proposed project is low to remote; however, since the . proposed project is located within a
- seismically -active region, and -ground shaking will likely impact the site -during the life of the project, - the --
following mitigation measure shall be required: -
_ __ __ _ __
_ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ . _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
_. _ _.. _ 15 _ _._. _
_ _
Required Mitigation
_ _ ... . _
_ _
• Structures are required to be designed and constructed fo resist the effects of seismic ground motions
as provided in the 20Q7 Califomia Building Code Section 1613. The following seismic design
coefficients should be implemented-during the.design .of the proposed-structures for the project: _
. , ,� . . . . �
� V" �
g � , f .
. . . . . . . n � . » �� t . . �.. .. ..
� O
Site Location L.atitude: �33.5407
Lon itude: -117.1098 .
Site Glass _ D
Ma ed S ectral Accelerations for short eriods, S 1.50
Map ed Spectral Accelerations for 1-Second Period, S, 0.60
Site Coefficient, F 1.00
Site Coefficient, F� 1.50
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response 1.50
Acceleration for 1-Second Short Periods, Sms
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response 0.9
Acceleration for 1-Second Period, S
Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, 1:0
Sp
Design Spectral Response Acceleration for 1-Second 0.60
Period; Sp,
Seismie Design Category D
Im ortance Factor Based on Occu anc Cate o II
• All conclusions and recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Study prepared by Earth-Strata,
Inc. dated February 9, 2009 shall be incorporated into the plans for the project and implemented during
construction.
6.a.iii. Less Than Significant: As indicated above, the project site is located in a seismically active region
and within the general vicinity of a number of earthquake faults. The secondary effects of the seismic activity
could produce several types of ground failure. These include landslides, ground lurching, shallow ground
rupture, and liquefaction/lateral spreading. The probability of occurrence of each type of ground failure
depends on the severity of the earthquake, distance from the faults, topography, the state of subsurface earth
materials, groundwater conditions, and other factors. Based on the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive
Report all of the potentiat secondary effects of seismic activity are considered unlikely.
Soil liquefaction was specifically examined in the Preliminary Geotechnicat Interpretive Report. Liquefaction
occurs as a result of substantial loss of shear strength or shearing resistance in loose, saturated, cohesionless
earth materia�s subjected to earthquake induced ground shaking. Potential impacts from liquefaction include
_ _
loss of bearing capacity, liquefaction related settlement, lateral movements, and surface manifestation.such as
sand boils. Seismically induced settlement occurs when loose sandy soils become denser when subjected to
shaking during an earthquake. The three factors determining whether a site is likely to be subject to
liquefaction include seismic ground shaking, type and consistency of earth rnaterials, and groundwafer level.
The proposed project will be supported by compact fill, alluvium and competent bedrock, with groundwater at a
depth of over 50 feet. As such, the potential for earthquake induced iiquefaction and lateral spreading beneath
the pcoposed structures is considered very low to remote due to the recommended compacted fill, relatively
lo.w gr.oundwater level, and the dense_natu�e.of fhe deeper onsite.earth materials. _...... .. . __ __ _
-- 6.a:iv. - No fmpact: According to the Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report, landslides=ace identified-as -
a type of ground failure that is typically studied. However, the report mentions that landslide debris was not `
observed during the subsurface exploration and no ancient landslides are known to exist on the site. No
_. impact from landslides is expected_to occur. _ _. _ _ .. _ _
_ _ _ __ _ �g _ _ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _
_ _ .. . _
_ . _ .. . _
6.b.. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a substantial loss of.topsoil_or_erosion
since the project will be graded according to all Public Works specifications and will be paved and improved
with asphalt; concrete, landscaping and other materials: Ttierefore, soil ergsion or loss of topsoil is not likely to
occur and a less than significant impact is anticipated. - _.
6:c.d. Potential Significant Unless Mitigation.lncorporated: According to the Pceliminary_Geotechnical
Interpretive Report completed for the project by Earth-Strata, dated February 9, 2009, the site visit indicates
that landslide debris were not observed on the site and no ancient landslides are known to exist on the site. In
- addition,- the preliminary -laboratory test results indicate -that_ the_ proposed structures will -be suppocted by
compacted fill, alluvium and competent bedrock, with groundwater at a depth of over 50 feet. As such, the
potential for earthquake induced lateral spreading beneath the proposed structures is considered very low to
remote due to the recommended compacted fill, relatively low groundwater level, and the dense nature of the
deeper on-site earth materials.
The Preliminary Geotechnical report also indicates that preliminary laboratory test results illustrate that onsite
earth materials exhibit an expansion potential of low to medium as classified in accordance with the: 2007
California Building Code Section 1802.3.2 and ASTM D4829-03. It cannot be determined at this time by the
laboratory tests that have already been conducted for the project site whether the soil has an either low or
medium expansion potential. As a result, the following mitigation measures shall be required for the earth
materials tested upon completion of the rough grading:
Required Mitigation
• The appropriate preliminary design and construction recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Geotechnical Interpretive Report completed by Earth-Strata, dated February 9, 2009, outlined on page
15 under the heading "Low Expansion Potential" and on page 16 under the heading "Medium
Expansion Potential", shall be incorporated into the project design, depending upon the determination
of the levels of expansion anticipated for the project, as determined at the completion of the rough
grading stage of the project.
6.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The project proposes a septic tank
instead of a traditional sewer connection. A Preliminary Geotechnical Interpretive Report dated February 9,
2009 was conducted by Earth-Strata, Inc. This report has indicated that from a geotechnical and engineering
perspective, the property is considered suitable for the proposed development, including the septic tank. In
addition, the Riverside Department of Environmental Health has deemed the On-site Wastewater Treatment
System (OWTS) as suitable for review based on ESI Soils Percolation Report Project # 08-0711-SP dated.
August 7, 2008. .
_. . .
_ _. _. _
. _ _ _ _ _
_. . _ __ _ _ _ . . _:... ..... _ _ _ __ _
_ _
_..... _ _ _ _ . _ ___ _. _. .._ . _ . .... _ __.... _ _..__ . .. _ ._
_
_ _ _.. _
_ ., ... . _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ .. _ _ _
_ _ _ _ ._ _ _
_ :. . ___ _. _ _ _ 17 . _ _._
_ .. _ __
_.... __ __... _. _ _ _
_ 7. _GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: _ _ ;
<�, y � 2 z.� PotentiallY � r' a <
� : � �f � n ; ? s ' - Potentiall Sigrnficant Uniess lessThan *
. �* ;; � �i -�, ; Issues ? ,r-,Significa t " Mi6gation �Sigrnficant No+.+' ; _ _ _
� < " - r . �� ";?.Im act ,, �:-:Incorporated., ' Im act?, ,zim act.:?
,:>,.., ,.,.. . ;. ., . �,...:. , . . .; ;, . .... .. . ,.. . _.
a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directiy or X
_
indirectly, fhaf may have a significanf impact on the
environment?
b Confliet with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted X
_ _
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse
ases?
Comments:
7.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: At this time there are no adopted statewide guidelines for greenhouse
gas emission (GHG) impacts, but this is being addressed through the provisions of Senate Bill 97 (SB 97). For
the proposed project, the pcoject would be considered to have a significant impact if the project would be in
conflict with the AB 32 State goals for reducing GHG emissions and have. Staff assumes that AB 32 will be
successful in reducing GHG emissions and reducing the cumulative GHG emissions statewide by 2020. It is
not anticipated that the project could have a major impact (either positively or negatively) on the global
concentration of GHG.
GHG impacts are considered to be exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative greenhouse
gas emission impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA, 2008). The proposed project would
contribute to global climate change as a result of emissions of GHGs, primarily CO emitted by construction
activities. However, the project will not conflict with the CARB's thirty-nine (39) recommended actions in
California's AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan. The project will also not exceed the SCAQMD GHG
screening threshotd (3,000 metric tons CO In addition, the City of Temecula does not have any plans,
policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. The project is expected to
have a less than significant impacf witii regard to greenhouse gas emissions.
_ _ ..
_ _ _ _ _
_ _. _ ...... . _ . __ __. _. _. . _
_
_ _.. ... _ _ _ .._........ . _.. _ _. _ _. _ _
_. ... . .. .. _ _ .. . . .. .._. .._ _....... _. . .. __. _. .
_ _..... __ _ __.. _._..... _._
. _. _ _.. _ _ _�g _ _ _ __
_
_
_ . . _ _ _ . _.
_... _ _ _...._. _... _
8: HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: --
_ _.
t � �, ; � '. ; PotenUally ' � ; y y
` „ � ,_ � F � Potentiaily Sign�ficant Unless Less,Than .� � �
^ Issues and Supporting Info�matwn Sources � r Sigrnfic,ant ; Mttigation Y -.ySigrnfcant No +<
� �' s; �f - - Im aet -=1nco �ated ,Im act; _ . -`�Irri act��„�:
., .. . . . .. .
...
a Create a significant tiazard to tfie public or the environmenf ' X
through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials? - - - -
_ _ _.
_ _ . . _ ... .. .
b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment X
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazacdous materials into
the environment?
c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely X
hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous X
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
si nificant hazard to the ublic or the environment?
e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the
pro'ect area?
f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the X
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
workin in the pro�ect area?
g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an X
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation lan?
h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, X
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Comments:
8.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the pu6lic or the environment
through the routine transportation, use or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed land use is a
religious facility and will not be routinely transporting, using or disposing hazardous materials.
8.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
_
- through reasonab�y upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment. Tfie proposed project is a religious facility and will not emit hazardous materials into the
environment, or impact the public through day-to-day operations. In addition, the project will not require the
-- handling of hazardous or-acutely hazardous materials,- substances and-waste. Additionally; -the proposed
project is not located within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ __
_
8.d. No Impact: The proposed project.will not be located on a site which is ineluded on a list of hazardous
__ _ _ _ _ _
_
materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant
hazard to the publie or the environment. The California Environmental Protection Agency lists Hazardous -
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ . __
_ _ . ____. _
�g. _ _ ___ __ _
_
_ _
_
_. _
_.
VVaste and Substances Sites. The project site is not on fhis list, therefore no impact related to hazardous
_ _ _ __ .. _ .. ._.... ._ _ _ _ . .. _. _
materials posing a significant hazard to the public or environment will occuc. __ _
8:e. Potential Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporafed: The French Valley Airport lies approzimately
-. two miles to the northwest and is the only air_strip in the immediate _area. Areas _surrounding French Valley.
Airport haVe been categocized into six zones. The proposed project resides in Zone E which is leasf restrictive
of all zones. E'er #he City of Temecula General Plan Environmental .Impact Report, Zone- E only prohibits
hazards to aircraft flight. The proposed project was also reviewed by the Riverside County Airport Land Use
Commission. The Commission stated that no action was necessary because of the project location, but the
Commission did provide afandard mitigation measures which address safety hazards.. - -_ -
Required Mitigation
• The following uses shall be prohibited:
o Any use which would direct steady light or flashing light of red, white, green, or amber colors
associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climki following
takeoff or toward and aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing a an airport,
other than an FAA approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator.
o Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial
straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach
towards a landing at an airport.
o' Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or which would attract large
concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area.
o Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of
aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation.
• Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of
lumens or reflection into the sky.
• The attached notice shall be provided to all potential purchasers and tenants of the property and shall
be recorded as a deed notice (notice is attached to the Mitigation Monitoring Program).
8.f. No Impact: The project is not located with within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area as a result of a private airfield. No
impact is anticipated.
8.g. No Impact: The proposed project will not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with, an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project site is located within
an area that is surrounded by residential development and a public park located immediately across Calle
Girasol. In addition, the subject parcel for which the project is proposed is zoned Very Low (VL) residential and
is intended to be developed. The development of this parcel will not physically interfere with an adopted
. _ __
erriergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan.
8.h. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula Geographic Information Systems Department, the
_ _ _ _ _
_
project site is not located within a High Fire Hazard area. Therefore, the projecf will not expose people or `
structures to a_significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
_ _ _
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residents intermixed with wildlands. The closest High Fire Wazard areas
are located approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast and southwest of the project area: Since the project is not
located within a High Fire Hazard area and is not located in the immediate proximity of a High' Fire Hazard
_ _ _ __
-- area, injury, death and loss of life resulting from a.wildfire is . not likely to occur. Additionally, the City . of
_ .
_ _ 20 _ _
__
_
7emecula Fire Prevention Bureau has reviewed the proposed projeef to ensure thaf it meets all fire code -
_ __ _ _ _ .
requirements, and that the project wilL be provided with fire pcotection, if needed, in the _case that fire does_ __ _
occur on-site. _
_ _
_
_ _
_, _
_ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _
__ _
_ _ _ __ _
_ _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ __ _ _ , _
_ _ _ ___ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _
_ _ _ _ _ __
_ . _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ . _ _ ,
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ 21 _ _ _ __
_ __ _ _ _ _
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
_..
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless : Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant 'No
_ Im act Incor orated Im act Im act
a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water
ualit ?
b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
ermits have been ranted ?
c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or X
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or X
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
on- or off-site?
e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
f Re uire the re aration of a ro'ect-s ecific WQMP? X
g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Ma or other flood hazard delineation ma ?
h Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which X
would im ede or redirect flood flows?
i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Inundation b seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
_ _
Comments: -
9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes a religious faci�ity totaling 8,264 square feet.
This type of development typically generates domestic and/or municipal wastewater that does not require
pretreatment or waste discharge requirements. - No water quality standards are-forecast to be violated by
implementing the proposed project. In addition, the projecf submitted a Water Quality Management P an or
review by the Public Works Department. This document has been conceptually accepted. Upon acceptance
- of-a #inal WQMP, Best Management Practiees-outlined in-the WQMP-will be implemented which-will control
storm water runoff pollution to a level of no significance. Therefore an overall less than significant impact is
anticipated. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ __
9.b, Less Than Significant lmpact: The proposed .project is not anticipated to result in a: substantia
- - depletion groundwater supplies or substantial interference with groundwater recharge such that there would --
_ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ ___ __ ___. __ _ _.
_ _ _. _ _ 22 _
_ _ _ _ _ ___ __.
_ _ _ _
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. The proposed project is not
anticipated to have an effect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either through direct additions or
withdrawals through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of
groundwater recharge capability. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the proposed
project. _ _ _
9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area. Through the implementation of the project SWPPP (Storm Water Protection Program), erosion
and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant impact level and this project will not result in
substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site. The existing water course at the eastern boarder of the property
will retain its original course.
9.d.e.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would increase runoff as a result of increasing the
impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard design criteria to detain surface runoff on
the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased.
The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the
State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm-Sewer permit (MS4 Permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB). A preliminary plan has �been submitted and conceptually accepted and the project
will comply with RWQCB standards as designed.
Based upon the information presented above, no significant adverse impact to either downstream flows or
water quality is forecast to affect properties downstream of the site from developing the property as proposed.
Less than significant impacts are proposed.
9.g.h. Less Than Significant Impact: No buildings or structures will be located within the 100-year
floodplain according the City of Temecula General Plan EIR as a result of implementing the project. No
significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed. Less than
significant impacts are anticipated.
9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee
or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. In
addition, the City has implemented a multi-hazard functional plan pursuant to the California Emergency
Services Act. Staff has also received correspondence from _the Riverside County Flood Control and Water
Conservation District indicating that the project would not be impacted by the District Master Drainage Plan
facilities. Flood Controt also states that the project is located within the limits of the district's Murrieta
Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. The project will
be conditioned to pay these fees prior to issuance of grading permits. A less than significant impact is
anticipated. _
9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and elevation, there is no potential for a
tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body and there is no potential for
inundation by seiche or mudflow. No impacts are anticipated.
_ _ __ _ _
_ _ _ _
_ _
__ _ _.. _.. _ _ __ .. _._ __ _ _- --_. _ _ -
_ _ _
_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ . _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ _
_... _ _. _
_ . _ _ _ _ 23 _ _ _ . _ _:. _ .
_ _
_ _
_...._ __. . _ _ _ . . _...... .. _ :.. .. ._ ... ... _.
_ _ _... _ _ _ .. . . _ _
10. ° LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: - -
_
_ _ _ _ _. _
� Potentially. ;
r ^ 1 := �� ; ' 1 Fotentially ; Significant Unless Less Than . ; �, ,`.' '
� ' � �Issues and Supporting Inforrr�ation Sou'rces �, ; Sigrnficant . `Mibgation ,.�: Significant ; No ; .�a;
�
� �lm act. ' " =1ncb orated1,.. Im act
x ; - a i„�, . ,Im' ��e't
, ..__, _ , �� s.� � t . � _._. , .� ,., . ,
a Pti sicall divide an established communit � X
b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or X
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the-project - -
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X
natural community conservation plan?
Comments
10.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not physically divide an established community. The proposed
project is an infill development project located on a 2.32 acre parcel, which is currently vacant. The proposed
project is surrounded by residential parcels to the east and south, a public park to the west and a vacant parcel
to the north. The project does not involve any additional street or highway improvements which could
otherwise divide an established community.
10.b. No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with an applicable land use plan, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the project, (including, but not limited to the General Plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Very Low (VL) residential. The zoning for
the property is also Very Low residential. The proposed religious facility is consistent with the General Plan
land use and zoning designations for the property. The proposed project meets all Development Code and
zoning standards. Since the Development Code is a tool to implement the General Plan, and this project
meets all Development Code Requirements, it can be concluded that the project is also consistent with the
General Plan. No conflict with any applicable land use plan will occur.
10.c. No Impact: The proposed development of the project will not conflict with the provisions of the Multi-
Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi-jurisdictional plan which
focuses on the conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The
Plan's overall goal is to maintain biological and ecological diversity within the rapidly urbanizing area. The Plan
Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres and includes the Cify of Temecula within its boundaries.
In considering the development of this site in the context of the MSHCP, it has been determined that the
_.
project site is not located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell. However, according to the MSHCP, the site does
have a potential for Borrowing Owl habitat. Additional information related to the findings and analysis
contained in the biological assessment can be found in fhe Biological Resources Section (above-Section 4).
__ _ _ __ _ _
_
_. _ _..... . .._.. ., _._. ._... -.. _ _... ._ -_. ._.__ :__.._. _ _ . ... _._ . __ .....
_
_ __ _
_. _. _ . _ _.... _ _ _ .. __ _ ___ _ _ .
_ _ .. _. . .. ...__ _ . .. _ __ _. _ _ .
_ _- _. .. _ _ _ _ 24 _ :_ _ . _ :_ : _ _ . .
_
_ .. _ . _ _.
_ _. _ _ _ _ ..
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
`a ` ��� � s Poten�ally � , �,�� �
;; . i ' -" ,,; "!. � � Paten6ally r Sigrnficant Unless Less Than .
; .issues and Supporting inforrrmation Sources , ��," Significa�t,�c MiUgation : Significant : No F
- ;,^�.'� �Jm act�,-1^. ,Iri�or orated�? =�im act, ��Irn act+ �
. ,. . ... � . . �a. , .,., _ „
a Result in the loss of availability of a known . mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
_ _
residents of the state? _ _ _ _
b Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
eneral lan, s ecific lan or other land use lan?
Comments:
11.a. No Impact: The construction of this project on the proposed site is not anticipated to result in the loss
of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According
to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled
Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165,
which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the
Temecula Planning Area was classified as a Mineral Resources Zone-3a (MRZ-3a), which determined that the
area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and
crushed stone for aggregate, however these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of
significant economic value.
11.b. No Impact: The project is not anticipated to result in the loss of locally important mineral resources,
as the project site, which is within the above mentioned Temecula Planning area, has been classified as a
Mineral Resources Zone-3a (MRZ-3a). According to the General Plan, the Temecula Planning Area is not
considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. The property on which the proposed
. project will be located does not represent an area of locally important mineral resources.
_ _ _ _ _
. __ _ _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_
_ _
_: _ _ _ . _ ,_ _ _
_. __ _ . . _ _ _
_ __ ._ . _.. _ _ _: 25 _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
_ .. .
__ . __ _... ....._ _ _ __.... _ _.
_
_. . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _. . _.. . _
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
_ _.
_ . .. _
s� y r ° � , : � Potentially.. . � , k 4
;
� � ' " " ' ; ;_� ' ; � Potenbally � SignifiCant Unless iess Than � *�n � , �, � . � � � � � � � �
z: t� Issues and Supportng InformaUon Sources Significant MiUgahan < Sigrnficant . No �.: e
� � `e Irn act::"' ��Inco " orated`�' ;:IrY� act '` - Irti act' - � �
. . , , . . ,.,» .� � � „ �. „ . , , . . . _
.. _ _.
a Exposure of persons to or gene�ation of noise levels in X
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other - -
a encies?
b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive X
roundborne vibration or roundborne noise levels?
c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels X
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
pro'ect?
d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient X
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the ro'ect?
e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, X
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would X
the project expose people residing or working in the
pro'ect area to excessive noise levels?
Comments:
12.a.b.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: Development of the land will result in increases to noise levels
during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long-term. No activities are
anticipated within the proposed project that would expose persons to generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating
from the project site as patrons arrive and leave the religious facility. However, those noises are not
anticipated to create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project due to the low impact nature of a religious institution. The project may result
in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is
capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 50 feet, which is considered bothersome. However,
noise from construetion of the project witl comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to
Monday through Friday from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m: and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No significant
impacts are anticipated.
12.e.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The project is located within the French Valley Comprehensive Land
Use Plan issued by the Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission. The plan divides the area
-- surrounding the airport into six zones. Many of these zones prohibit the development of highly noise-sensitive
outdoor nonresidential uses: According to this plan, the project is located in Zone E. This zone does not
include the prohibition of highly noise-sensitive nonresidential uses. Furthermore, no outdoor uses are
--- - proposed for the project. The French Valley airport is the only airstrip located in the vicinity of the project site: --
- The project is not located within the French Valley Airport Noise Contours exhibit provided on page N-13 of the
--- Gity of Temecula General Plan: A less than significant impact is anticipated. - - --- - - -
.
_
_ .
_ _
_
_._ __.__ . _ _ _ . __ _ __. _ _
_. _ _ . . _ _
26. _ . _ .. _ _ _ _ . _ ._ __ ..
_
_
_. _ _.. .
_._.
_ _ .. ... .. _.
_ _ _ _ __ _
_ __
_ _ __ . _ __. .. _ __.
- 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: -
_
- r 3 � ;. � f � x �. �" } �,��'' z s. F Potentially # � � : ��
�� �"� , +� ,�r z ? , ; i.�` = r � Potentially k , SigrnficanYUnless ,yLess Tha�
, � � Yr � ° � : Issues and Supporting InformaUon Sources ; w ' ` � �� Sigrnficant ° Mrtigation tSignificant �No t , .. - .. - .
«.,� . . ,�+. .. .�`,>;1: �:� �;, .. `. ,. ,. . _?.,.,3 'h ��::� . . ; �_ , ` � ... .-x , s ��,�.'_ � . ��, .��` �� -flin aC{ �;inco 'orated , im`� ac;-� �Irri� act � _�
,. _ ..... : . .
a Induce_ substantial population growth in an area, either X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
_...... ..
roads or other infrastructure ?
b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X
construction of re lacement housing elsewhere?
' Comments:
13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not induce substantial population growth in
the area. The proposed project is for a religious facility located in a Very Low Residential zoning district in the
City of Temecula. This religious facility is not anticipated to create new jobs in a manner that will substantially
raise the population in the Temecula area. In the event jobs are created, the minimal increase in population
that may potentially result is considered to be less than significant when compared to the projected population
growth that is anticipated for the Temecula Area.
13:b.c. No Impact: The project includes the construction and operation of a 8,294 square foot religious faci�ity
on a vacant parcel within a Very Low Residential zoning district in the City of Temecula. Considering the site is
currently vacant, it can be concluded that the project will not displace existing housing or necessitate the
construction or replacement of housing elsewhere.
_
_ _ . _ . _
_ _ . -- _ __ _ _ _. _ _ _ . .._ _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ . _ - _. _ , _
_ __ _ _ _ __ _ __,_ _ _
_ _ __ _ _ _ _
_ . ._ _. __ . . _ _ . _ _ :. 27 _ _ _ . .
_ _ _
_
_ _ _......... _. __ _ __
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ .. __ _..__. ___.
- 14. PUBLIC SERVICES:
_
�,�n 'a s �" a4 � �� , �� PotenLally
"-e a , >� ks� � �i .. t s,' t tPotenUally r Signficant llnless NLess Than
;n�' �� x> ; Issues and Supporting InformaUon Sources �, Sigrnficant � 4 :��Mingation Significant No ,:
; i . �aa � a` a c �.x. t ,� - ��..,,�. - t �
� a ' ` *� ' -; �, _ „ . . ..,.: a" „� _ Im act, ` sinco orated. , �, Im acfs .,.. .,.Im �act,"
. . � . .., _.. � . _ . . . .�_.. J,. .. .i_. .,... . . . „ >,_ . .
..... . . . .. .._. .. ....... ..�.... . _.... ..._._. . ..... ...... ..._. _. . ... ....
a Would the project result in substantial adyerse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
-- altered governrnental facilities, need for new or physically -
_ _ __
altered govemmental facilities, the consfruction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
erformance ob�ectives for an of the ublic services
Fire rotection? X
Police rotection? X
Schools? X
Parks? X
Other public facilities? X
Comments:
14.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon the need for
new or altered fire, police, recreation or other public facilities. The development of the site will incrementally
increase the need for these services; however the development of this parcel was anticipated in the Final
Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the City of Temecula General Plan. Therefore, the need
for pub�ic services was previously analyzed and determined. As a result, the incremental increase in the need
for these services, based upon the development of this project, will not result in a significant environmental
impact. No additional police or fire facilities will be required to be constructed in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios or fire/emergency response times. No additional parks or other facilities are proposed to be
constructed as part of this project. Furthermore, the project will contribute its fair share to public services
through the City's Development Impact Fees for the maintenance or. provision of services from these entities.
The project itself is not proposing a residential use and therefore will have no impact upon, or result in a need
for new or altered school facilities. Development of the subject parcel will not cause a significant increase in
the number of people within, or coming to, the City of Temecula. The incremental effect from the project will be
mitigated through the payment of applicable school fees at the time the pcoject is developed. A less than
significant impact to existing public services is anticipated as a result of the project.
_ _ _
_ _ __ _
__ _ ._ _.__.... _...._- _ _.. . ... _ _._ _ _ . . . _...... .. . ___. ,. _ _... ......
_ _ __ __ _ _ _ _
_ _
__ . .__. ._. ._ . _._ _ . :. _ _ . . _ .. .. _ _.. . . ..... _ _ _ .. _..... . . ...
_.. _.. _ __ _. ..
_ . _ _. 28 _ _. _ ..
_ _..
_
_ _ _
_
__ _
_. . _ _ . _ .
15. RECREATION.
_ _. __ _
_ _ _
; s ,. ' �� t � � s � � � , POteYtt�811 � ' s �*�y`� � s' x
� � ; ° ',� �. , Potentially Signfic�nt U less'" �Less Than � �� �1 ; , a �
>a , •. Issues and SupporUng Informatwn Sources s ,, �i'� Sigrnficant �' � . Mitigation � '�� � ���Sigmfcant � � � No ��
,
; ,.,.. •
` ,,,. ;: _ <.Im' act . Inco o€atetl � Im act? Im act
'
, ,�„ � �, � ,. , ._,. , ..-: � . . .., ,. ,. ,, ,. , ., .,�. .,.,;.. M„. ,,, . ..
�.,.. . . . .. :.. _ _
a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood X
and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
- - substantia{ physical deterioration of the facility would occur - -
_ _ _ _
or be accelerated?
b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the X
construction or expansion of cecreational facitities which
might have an adverse ph sical effect on the environment?
_
Comments
15.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project witl have a less than significant impact on the
existing recreational opportunities and existing parks since the proposed project is a non-residential
development. The City owns and maintains 38 parks, and has two recreational centers, and outdoor
amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum and Children's
Museum. There are 22 neighborhood parks in the Temecula Planning Area which serve the recreational
needs of the residents, and based upon the City's population of 72,715 residents at the time that the General
Plan was updated, the City should offer 364 acres of parkland. Currently there are 308.73 acres of parkland
existing within the City. The proposed project may slightly increase the use of the existing parks or other
recreational facilities in the area because it is possible the patrons of the religious facility may wish to visit the
existing public park located immediately across Calle Girasol. It must be noted that nearly all patrons of the
religious facility and adjacent park will be Temecula residents. As such, sirice this project is a non-residential
development, the demand for parks would not increase significantly as a result of this project. The proposed
project would not directly result in the substantial deterioration of the existing recreational and park facilities,
nor would this project increase the deterioration of existing park and recreational facilities.
15.b. No Impact: The project does not require or inctude the construction or expansion or recreational
facilities that could otherwise have an adverse impact on the environment. The proposed project is for the
development of an 8,294 square foot religious facility. The scope of the project does not include the
construction of any additional recreational facilities or parks. Therefore, no impact will occur as a result of the
project.
-
_
_._ _ _.
_ _. .._.. __ . .- -_ .. .._ _._.._. _ .. . _ . . _. . . . . _. _ _ _.
__
_
_.
_ _ _, _: _ _ __ . ..:. _ __ __ __ _ _ _ _ .
_ _ _ _ . _ _. _ _
_ . _ _ __._
_ . 29 _. _ .. _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_. _ ___. _ .__ _.. _. _. ___....
_ . _. _ _ _
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIG. Would the project:
_.
, , � : >� ; ?; Potentialiy �
� � �' . . r . �`'" `1 J 'sf R' �- � .
;:� y�a, ; ' Polentially Signrficant Unless �ess Than ,� {
•: r : � ' issues and,Supportng Informa�on Sources � � Sigrnficant ± Mttigauon x S�grnficant `No �'
� ;x �� � � : � '� � - °� � = ; '-- .:, , .. �.� �F; , im' �act, <.: Inco "oratetl .. ,Im actF liri act � �
a Conflict with an a li � ' . . . , . 3 ... .. . . . � . ,
,,., .w _
_ _ _
pp cable plan, ordinance or policy X
establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance
of the circulation- system taking into- account all modes of- -
_
transporfation including mass transit and non-motorized
travel and relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways
and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass
transit?
_
b Conflict with an applicable congestion management X
program, including, but not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion management agency
for desi nated roads or hi hwa s?
c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an X
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safet risks?
d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., X
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatibte
uses e.g., farm equi ment)?
e Result in inadequate emer enc access? X
f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding X
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safet of such facilities?
Comments:
16.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan. A
religious facility is a permitted use with a Conditional Use Permit in a Very Low Residential General Plan
district. Therefore, traffic impacts have already been evaluated in the General Plan Environmental Impact
Report. Per the City of Temecula's Traffic Engineer, construction of roadway and traffic improvements in the
Roripaugh CFD will mitigate some of the proposed traffic increases, No further traffic study is required as a
result of this information as less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.
16.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on air traffic patterns and will not result in a
_ _ _
substantial safety risk. The project is located within Zone E of the French Valley Comprehensive Land lJse
Plan. According to the plan, developments located in this zone require an airspace review for structures
greater than 100 feet. The proposed religious facility is one story and totals 21 feet 3 inches high. No impact
is anticipated. �
_ _ _. _
16:d.e.f. No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The
project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed project
..-. -=prouides for- adequate- ingress and egress. from the site. -The..Fire and. Police Departments .have reviewed the. -
' proposed project and ha�e determineci that adequate emergency access has been provided, including on-site
- -circufation. -The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or programs regarding public -
transit; bicycle; or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No
impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
_ ._. . _ . _ ..._..._ _ _.. _:. _ _.. ___ _ __
_ _ _ _... _ _. . _. . _ _
_ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ 30: _ _ . _
_ _
__
_
_ . . _ __. . _ _
_ _ . .. _ _ _. _
17. UTILITIES AND SERViCE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
_.. _ . _ _
_
, ,, � ; r `. Potentiall v
�, \
1 - ` � ' ;, Potentia�l Sigrnficant U less� �L�ss'Than , :.
y
' � - �'" ' ` ,.� Issues and Supporting InformaUon Sources - •, � �Signficant � MiUgation s Significant >No `•
= , , .. „i' , ,,, . �, i . ,; ' .. ;:` ' ' ;' ; ' {rii act :inco `"oiated Im aet' . , Im act '.
., .. . _.
_ _ .. _ .
a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of ' the X
a licable Re ional Water Qualit Control Board?
b Require or result in the construction of new water or - - X
_
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c Require or result in the construction of new storm water X
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project X
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
ex anded entitlements needed?
e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment X
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the rovider's existin commitments?
f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to X
accommodate the pro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs?
g Compty with federal, state, and local statutes and X
re ulations related to solid waste?
Comments
17.a.b.e. No Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction
of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. This is because the project will utilize
a septic tank to handle waste needs. As a result, no waste water will be handled by the area's treatment
providers.
17.c. No Impact: The project will create storm water impacts for the surrounding area. The project has
been reviewed by the City of Temecula Public Works Department, which has concluded that the project will not
require the construction of new storm water drainage :facilities or the expansion of existing storm water
facilities. The existing drainage facilities serving the area are well equipped to handle the project and no
impact is anticipated as a result of the project.
17.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project is located within the service boundaries of Rancho
California Water District (RCWD). This agency has indicated that water availability is contingent upon the
timing of the subject project development relative to water supply ahortage contingency measures. However,
the-project-will not significantly impact existing water supplies-nor require expanded water entitlements. While -
the projecf will have an incremental impact upon existing systems, the Final Environmental Impacf Report
(FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "RCWD anticipates supplying water to 167,640 persons within its
- service area-in 2020" (pg. 5:14-3). The FEIR further states: "EMWD anticipates supplying water to-756,699 - -
persons within its=service area in 2020" (pg. 5.14-3). This anticipated water-supply includes a portion of
-- Temecula. - Since the-project is consistent with #he Cify's -General Flan; less than- significant impacts are -
anticipated as a result of the this project. - -
_ .
_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _.
_ _ _ _ _
_ . 31 _
_ .. _ __ -
.
_
_ _
_ __
_
_.
17.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any
_
potential. impacts from solid waste created by. this development can be mitigated through . participation in ___
Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts
_
are anticipated as a result.of this project.
_. _
_ _ _ _ - ._ _ _. ..._ _ __ _ _. ....
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: _. - -
# � "� ;�- , r t t ' " Potentially ' t :"
, � F . r� ��� z „� t i Potentially Sigrnficant Unless y Less Than ;- �
-•y c'` s ,� � q x � � ' S�gnficant y ` MrtigaUo� �> >•Significant No t Y .
>, , ? ;; , � , ...,,', Issues andSu � oitm .loforinahon`Sources � : , i' . . �Im act ?Incor "oiated +.�t . Im act=: �Im act'�;:
a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of X
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or rehistory?
b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, X
but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of robable future ro'ects ?
c Does the project have environmental effects which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
Comments:
18.a. Less than Significant Impact: This site is surrounded by development and does not contain any
viable habitat for fish or wildlife species. This is an in-fill development and it does not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Less than significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
18.b. Less fhan Signi�cant Impact: The effects from this project are less than significant from a cumulative
impact perspective. All of the impacts associated with the project will not be considerable when viewed in
_. _
connection with fhe effect of the past projects, current projects and future projects. Less than significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
18.e. Less than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause
substantial.adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The residential project will be designed and _..
developed consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. No significant impacts are anticipated
as a result of this project.
_ _ .. .. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._ . _
_.
_ __ _ _
_. _ _ __ _. . _ _ _ . . _ __
__
_ .
_ _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _. _ _ _
_ _ _ ._ _ _ _
. _ ._ _ _ _ _
32 _ __ _ __ _ _
_ . __
_ _
__.. _. _ _.. _ _ _ __.. _ _ _ _ _. __..
_ _ _ . . . __
19. EARUER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program
_ EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier
- - EIR or negative: declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D).. : In this case a discussion should_identify. _
the following on attached sheets.
_ _ __ _._ ,_ . _.....__. ... _._ _... _... _ . .
a Earlier analyses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where they are available for review.
b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of
_
and- adequately -analyzed in an earlier document-pucsuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis.
c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe
the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which the address site-specific conditions for the pro'ect.
19.a: The City`s General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report were used as a reference source in
preparing this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning
Department located at 43200 Business Park Drive
19.b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier
analysis.
19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook
4. Habitat Assessment prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, June 25, 2009
5. Jurisdictional Determination prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates, November 17, 2009
6. Detmination of Biological Equivalent or Superior Protection prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates,
February 3, 2010
7: URBEMIS 2007 Analysis Report prepared by Randall Blackwood, May 5, 2010
8: Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment prepared by Archaeological Associates
_.
_
_:. _ _
_. -
_ _ _ . _ _.
_ _. _ _ .
_ ..- . _ . _ __ _._ _ _ ... _ . . _ . . .. __. . .... _ . _ _ _
_...__ _... __ _: _....
_ . _ ____ _ _ _ 33 _. _ . . _ _ _ _ _
_ _ . _ _ _
_.
_
_ _
.
i
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN
_ _
Mitigation Monitoring Program
_ _ . _
_ _
Project Description: A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit- (PA09-0061) .
to construct and operate a 8,294 square foot Religious Institution
(Kingdom Hall for the Jehovah Witness Congregation) on 2.32
acres within a Very Low Residential (VL) zoning district.
Location: Generally located on the southeast corner of Aussie Avenue and
Calle Girasol
Applicant: Mr. Joseph Van Haster
41221 Via Anita
Temecula, CA. 92592
Air Quality
General Impact: Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Mitigation Measures: 1. Use of Best Available Control Measures pursuant to Air
Quality Management District guidelines for PM10 and for
diesel equipment exhaust: and during all grading activities.
2. Water all active construction areas at least twice daily.
3. Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of
freeboard.
4. Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking
_ or staging areas.
5. Sweep or wash any site access points within 30 minutes of
any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway.
_ 6. Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris,
dirt or other dusty materiaL
_
7. Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds
exceed 25 mph.
' 8. Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is
_ to remain inactive for than 96 hours aftec clearing is _
_ _ completed. �
_
_ .. _ _ _ _._ ___ . ._ __ _ _.9. Ensure. .that all __cut and fill slopes ace. _ permanently _ . .
_ _ _ ._. _
protected from erosion.
_ ._ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
_
_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
__. _._ _ _ _ _ _
_ _. _ ._. _ _... _ __ _ _ _ _ _
_
__ �
10. Require the construction contractor to ensure that all
- - - construction equipment is maintained in peak working
_ _ order.
11. Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy
equipment.
12. Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods.
13. Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways.
� 14. Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site:
15. Wash or sweep away access points daily.
16. Sandbag construction sites for erosion control.
Specific Process: Place the above conditions of approval on this project to reduce
construction equipment emissions and dust; and to protect
sensitive receptors generated by grading/soil disturbance and
construction operations.
Mitigation Milestone: During grading and construction. •
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department
Biological Resources
General Impact: Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Mitigation Measures: 17. A 30-day Burrowing Owl Pre-construction Survey shall be
conducted prior to any ground disturbing activity: If
-- - burrowing owls are found on the site, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service shall be consulted regarding relocation of
the owls. Relocation may only occur during the non-
breeding season. Alternatively, pre-construction surveys
may be conducted at five-day intervals until three
_ _ consecutive surveys fail to find owls on the site.
- 18. A 25-foot buffer will be established around the
_. _. . _ _ - --_ _ _ _
riverine/riparian area to protect the area from development -
- or other disturbance. (Per the biological consultant Brian F.
_ _ _ _. _ _. _... _
Smith and Associates, this mitigation measure would not be
_
_ _ _
requi�ed if a Dete�mination of Biological Equivalent or
- Superior Protection (DBESP) was completed: A DBESP
_ _ ._ __ _ _ _. _ _. . __ _. _ _. . _ _ ,
_ _ __ _ _ _ _. _
_ _ __ _ _ _ __ _. _ _ _. _ _
__
_ 2
was completed on February 3, 2010. The results of this
study concluded that the project will not restrict or
- significantly divert flows in the waterway):
19. During construction the ciparian/riverine area as
determined by the jurisdictional delineation and the 25-foot
buffer will be fenced with orange vinyl construction barrier
material to insure there are no accidental intrusions into
the area. Placement of fencing shall be under the direction
of a qualified biologist and will remain in place until all
construction is completed. During construction the fence
will be regularly inspected by the project biologist to insure
its integrity. This condition will be incorporated into the
grading plans.
20. The riverine/riparian area as determined by a jurisdictional
delineation shall be set aside in a conservation easement
and conveyed to an appropriate agency for management.
If an agency cannot be found to manage the property,
restrictions preventing any development of the
riparian/riverine will be included in the deed for the
property.
21. The boundary of the riparian/riverine buffer as determined
by jurisdictional delineation will be fenced in a manner that
will allow wildlife access but will minimize intrusion by
humans and domestic animals. The fencing will be
included on construction plans. Maintenance of the �
fencing will be included in the deed restrictions.
22. When designing, installing, and maintaining landscaping,
property owners will not use any of the invasive species
listed on Table 6.2, Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP. This
condition will be incorporated into landscaping plans and
deed restrictions:
. 23. All outside lighting will be of low wattage and shielded,
directing light downward, onto the property and away from
the cipariah/riverine area. This condition will be made part
of construction : plans for all facilities erected on the
property.
Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval
-- - on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than
_
_
significant eve .
_
--- -- Mitigation Milestone:-- - Precise Grade Plan shall- show that the required - Mitigation -
Measures have been incorporated into the project design prior to
-- - -- -_ - the issuance of grading permit/building permit:
_
_. _ _
_. _ _ _ ___ _... _.__ _
__ __ _ _
_. . _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ , _. . . _
_ _ 3 _
Responsible Monitoring
- - Party: Planning Department and Public Works Department _
_ _
Cultural Resources
General Impact: Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature.
Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
Mitigation Measures: 25. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project
applicant/developer is required to enter into a Treatment
Agreement with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians.
This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition
of cultural resources and human remains that may be
uncovered during construction as well as provisions for
� tribal monitors.
26. Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation
and ground-breaking activities, including further surveys, to
be compensated by the project applicant/developer. The
Pechanga Tribal monitors will have the authority to
temporarily stop and redirect grading activities to evatuate
, the significance of any archeological resources discovered
on the property, in conjunction with the conjunction with
the archeologist and the Lead Agency.
27. If human remains are encountered, all activity shall stop
and the County Comer must be notified immediately: All
activity must cease until the County Corne� has determined
the origin and disposition of said remains. The Corner
shall determine if the remains are prehistoric, and shall
notify the State Native American Heritage Commission if
- applicable. Further actions shall be determined by the
desires of the Most Likely Descendant.
_
28. The Landowner agrees to relinquish ownership 'of all
_ _ resources, including all Luiseno sacred items, burial goods
and all archeological a�tifacts that are found on the project
area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper
treatment and disposition.
- - 29. All sacred sites within the project area are to be avoided �
__. . _ _ __ . . __ _ __ _ and preserved.
_ _ _ _ . _ _... __
_. _ _. _ .
_ . _ _ _..._ __ __
___ . _ _._ _. _ __ _ _ _ . _
_ __ _ . _ _ . .._ _ _
__ . _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _. _ __ _ _._ _
_ 4
Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval
- on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than
- . significant level. -
_
Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all
applicable project plans.
Responsible Monitoring
Party: Planning Department
Geology and Soils
Generallmpact: Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial
evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
Strong seismic ground shaking.
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
Mitigation Measures: 30. Structures are required to be designed and constructed to
resist the effects of seismic ground motions as provided in
the 2007 California Building Code Section 1613. The
- - following seismic design coefficients should be
implemented during the design of the proposed structures
_ _ . for the project:
_
_
_ __
_ . _ _.
_. _ _
_ _..._.. .._ . ___ ... __ .. _ ..._ _ . __ __ _ . _._ _
_ _
_.
_ . . ..._ . _ . : . . .. _ _ _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ __. .
_ ...__ .. . _ _. _ _. ... _
__. . . _ . .. __ __ ... _ . . ..... .. . _ . _ _ _.. __ _ _
_, 5
� . t.
Site Cocation Latitude: 33.5407
Lon itude: -117.1098
_ Site Ctass �
Ma ed S ectral Accelerations for short eriods, S 1.50
Ma ed S ectral Accelerations for 1-Second Period, S, 0.60
Site Coefficient, F 1.00
Site Coefficient, F� 1.50
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response 1.50
Acceleration for 1-Second Short Periods, Sms
Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response �•9
Acceleration for 1-Second Period, S
Design Spectral Response Acceleration for Short Periods, 1.0
SDS
Design Spectral Response Acceleration for 1-Second 0.60
Period, Sp,
Seismic Desi n Cate o �
Im ortance Factor Based on Occu anc Cate o ��
31. All conclusions and recommendations specified in the
Geotechnical Study prepared by Earth-Strata, Inc. dated
February 9, 2009 shall be incorporated into the plans for
the project and implemented during construction.
32. The appropriate preliminary design and construction
recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Geotechnical Interpretive Report completed by Earth-
Strata, dated February 9, 2009, outlined on page 15 under
the heading "Low Expansion Potential" and on page 16
under the heading "Medium Expansion Potential,° shall be
incorporated into the project design, depending upon the
determination of the levels of expansion anticipated for the
project, as determined at the completion of the rough
grading stage of the project.
Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval
on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than
_ _ _ _ . __
significant level.
Mitigafion Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all
applicable project plans.
_ _
_ _ : _
Responsible Monitoring
: Party: Planning Department and Public Works
_
__ .. ... . _ _ _ _._ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _
_ _
_
_ _ .. _ ___ __ __ . . _ __ _ __ .
_ _ _
_ _ _
__ _ _ __ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _. __ _ _
_. _ _. . _ _. _ . _ . _ __ _ _ _
_
___ _.. __. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __.
_.. _ _ . _
. 6
- Hazards and Hazardous Materials
_
General Impact: For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within finro miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
Mitigation Measures: 33. The following uses shall be prohibited:
o Any use which would direct steady light or flashing light of
red, white, green, or amber colors associated with airport
operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight
climb following takeoff or toward and aircraft engaged in a
' straight final approach toward a landing a an airport, other
than an FAA approved navigational signal light or visuat
approach slope indicator.
o Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected
towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb
following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a
straight final approach towards a landing at an airport.
o Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor or
which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which
may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area.
o Any use which would generate electrical interference that
may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or
aircraft instrumentation.
34. Any outdoor lighting that is instalfed shall be hooded or
shielded so as to preyent either the spillage of lumens or
reflection into the sky.
35. The attached notice shall be provided to all potentia)
purchasers and tenants of the property and shall be
recorded as a deed notice (notice is attached to the
- - Mitigation Monitoring Program).
Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval
on the project to reduce potential biological impacts to a less than
significant level.
_ _
Mitigation Milestone: Above referenced mitigation measures shall be placed on all
- - applicable project plans.
_ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _._ _. _ .. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Responsible Monitoring
_ _ _ __.
Parfy: Planning Deparfinent
_ . __ _ . _ _. _ . _ __
_ _ _ _. _ __ _. _ _. _
__. __.. _ _ _ _ . ___ __
_ 7 _ _
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
\��I�/�i
.t _ i�
� � �* Notice of Public Hearing
- ....,,�: .
- L: .,- ;1�989":=� - �`
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING DIRECTOR to consider the matter described below:
Case No: PA09-0061
Applicant: Joseph Van Haster
Proposal: A Development Plan with a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a
8,264 square foot religious facility on 3.15 acres within VL zoning, generally
located on the northeast corner of Calle Girasol and Aussie Avenue at 31640 Calle
Girasol
Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a
completed Environmental Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. As a result,
a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section
15070
Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Main Conference Room
Date of Hearing: September 9, 2010
Time of Hearing: 1:30 p.m.
.. �• � - .;�� J i� I ;_.'� : - �`; ` � ti 1
_ �''�� ,•. / r ���:.: `= =��'�
_ �j 1 r ;' � "=�,:�r-�•l••t
f � , � ;4 :1 .�� ��t�.`: 5 � 1 � � .� ir
�1,a:� � I � - --- - }+ p ' 4 � t�-= ���� � 11 � �� j
-� � ' � ' � - :�ite � � f"
S ` � I , � .~ ��•' • 1 ' �-_--- — _.--
� — I ' ,-�!". � � I y �a;,� y� �� �� `t9 � ~�
�, � r _.__,...,
.=; �' �� � ���--r--��-,.--'.
y�'''- ' _ `:�..�.;�;.. �;_ _I_ l�;--�` __ .— ,-��
_ __ .`' � f� I
___ , - -= -� f . _ �:;
r�� �'''�, ',` . - .s' 1 � �,
;� : '� �=� r ���_ � -
, _ ,�- :;�-
� , � �.
_ , , �. � � --::.
,�, �.� �:� � � �" ��
� ' I �- �.� U
1-1. 1 ���` - 1 �
� ��-�—� � ,�,'
' �) = F � � '�; i-. I� � � t -_- : �:�-_
r; '' - '' �'^ � ._c �-
N,,' ? � � � � --
'— r J , ��;��'K •°`
�1� ;r rY i _ lL..,� � �.� �I'�� �
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Director before the hearing or may appear and be
heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for
judicial review of a decision of the Planning Director shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by,
Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding
seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Director,
shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at,
or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 43200
Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project
may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 506-5115.