Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
010611 DH Agenda
AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING January 6, 2011 1:30 P.M. TEMECULA CITY HALL Great Oak Conference Room 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 1:30 p.m. Project Number: PA10 -0298 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Project Title: Harveston Bieri TPM Applicant: John Tanner III, RBF Consulting Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 (for financing purposes) to subdivide 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston Planning Area 12 Location: West of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15, and north and south of Date Street Environmental Action: CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations Project Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow Item No. 2 Project Number: PA10 -0152 Project Type: Residential Product Review Project Title: Redhawk Hemmingway HPR Applicant: Josh Gause, Standard Pacific Project Description: A Residential Tract Product Review for 59 lots (Tract 23064, Lots 23- 74, 79 -84, and 87) with units ranging in size from 2,888 to 3,406 square feet and includes three plan types and four elevations Location: Deer Hollow and Corte Mislanca Environmental Action: CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations Project Planner: Matt Peters The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Director's Hearing after 4:00,p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City s website at www.cityoftemecula.org. C:\Documents and Settings \Stuart.Fisk \Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content .Outlook \59V37G57 \01 -06 -11 Agenda.doc ITENf 1 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 6, 2011 PREPARED BY: Cheryl Kitzerow, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA10 -0298, a Tentative Parcel Map SUMMARY: No. 36336 (for Financing Purposes) to subdivide 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston's Planning Area 12, generally located west of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15, and north and south of Date Street RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination Section 15162, Consistent with Harveston EIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: John Tanner III, RBF Consulting General Plan Service Commercial Designation: Zoning Designation: SP -13, Harveston Specific Plan Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant North: Vacant, previously approved Mercedes Benz dealership South: Developed Industrial Park East: Existing Single Family residential across Ynez Road West: Interstate 15 Proposed Min. Required Minimum Lot Size: 3.67 acres 30,000 square feet BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 14, 2001, the City Council approved the Harveston Specific Plan and TTM 29639 -2 to subdivide 307 acres into specific planning areas. On October 14, 2010, RBF Consulting submitted a Tentative Parcel Map application to subdivide 98 acres within Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan area. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. 1 ANALYSIS Tentative Map No. 36336 is for Financing Purposes and involves the subdivision of 98 acres into 17 lots. No construction or development is proposed with this map. The lot sizes range from 3.67 acres to 10.38 acres, with an average lot size of 5.65 acres. Access to the proposed lots would be provided either from Ynez Road or internal access easements within the property. Access along Date Street has been restricted at this time but may be reviewed in the future when the French Valley Interchange is constructed and a development proposal is submitted. The subdivision has been designed consistent with the Harveston Specific Plan, Temecula General Plan and Subdivision Ordinance. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on December 22, 2010 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved EIR and is exempt from further environmental review. A Notice of Determination will be filed in accordance with CEQA Section 15162. FINDINGS (Per Municipal Code Section 16.09.040) Section 16.09.140, Tentative Map The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Harveston Specific Plan, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The Tentative Map does not divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed map subdivides 98 acres into 17 lots for financing purposes. No development is proposed with this subdivision. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map design is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Service Commercial zoning designation and the Harveston Specific Plan. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 2 The project consists of a parcel map on vacant property designated for service commercial uses, which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the Harveston Specific Plan and Harveston E/R. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The Tentative Parcel Map creates 17 parcels. Prior to the construction of future buildings, the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building and Safety Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. All acquired rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The project does not involve the construction of any residential uses and is therefore not subject to the City's parkland dedication requirements. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing 3 VICINITY MAP oo It PAl 0-0298 i f 3 6" e ' 0 250 500 Feet l PLAN REDUCTIONS IN TIE CITY OF TEAECLL . CO14TY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE 6 CALIFORNIA y� ,m TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP � NO. 36336 HARVESTON HARVESTON - '`� " T RACT 31053 -1 SEPTEA6ER0I0 355/669 COMMUNITY PARK �Y� S ZO 1 v„ rmS: \\ Np\y - 3AO h �3� �.�,r TRACT 29639 - 2 1w1u,a...mc+. eaw, 1x r.va o .ww uvvai. \µ nG� SSbIT . . . ...:....:... t ( N.B. 345/1 - 19 i ♦.. 1Brt -1n/ O l ew u `.Ex�w m ims b m, r u ¢ ar i� i�uA. )]. mm t HARVESTON TRACT 32432 - 1 ® _..� �. «ss I ?�.. \\ CHANNELL HARVESTON N393/16-22 , B 1 ym TRACT 32436 HARVESTON v, m1W �. , :dd tD 11 1r( M.B 39�/42� I TRACT 32436 -1 � >,,„. 1.50 ACRES GR I /g� u. a1,w� s ., a %a�`�:i,,. . a 1w,wrn ro..om -o.mm• ¢ y OSS AND NET 4.86 ACRES GROSS AND NET �r su r ,4n1w men. ,a1¢n1. '" I O 9 \ j / O 1� � n. mm. As •a1•.en w mo-m,mn ¢ •" < ,c:;:a ,, NEti R ��� s ; \9�(n m �' \ ,� EB,rt � / / \ .��• � \\v /// O STRINGERS GROSS AND , . ,- \ 13 4.07 A s 1 : LLA HO 8 8 mob. V � CROSS AND NET sT' ,/C <\ / 6. AID 2181 CRES 92 ACRES b .. s p 1 d MTi ro 0 tw 4.05 ACRES 4 O O � /: \ \ GROSS AET P u. 1Ni i NJ / ` ) P u.B. 1J9/89 -90 s.,o irtrtrm 1s .sv.m n ,xis ur 11 n. ..s ,e „c ri,wtr ¢ 2C0'i 069598T CR. 400 ACRE$ nl I 3,67 ACRES i m s v \ II GROSS AND NET Ac¢ CROSS AND NET `� ) ` w 55 \ \ • 1tEm .r ro x• x.u1w. arto ,o 1 A 6 52o I 1. � ,.gyp \ � is :: O`/\ . \ � a,... s�. �,.w,. ¢ •� „ ®1, �.o<.,m ra L� vs `I .I © 1. Via. t4 \ �:- n� •mow• ,, ..a, I A T O O 5.96 ACRES 5 ACRES AND NET 1.29 ACRES -. I^ I GROSS AND NET GROSS AND NET \ r r GROSS AND NET N 1.81 ACRES ,T. ,..> \ \ \\ LO. I) % 8 GROSS AMC NET' \ I ., • LOT S6 vy 1. A MO. PA.7 -02 ESVt I �� \• \ \ ViST .0. \ 6C].065519T CR + � ''•_ s u01 1ve a ,urz CITY OF PROPOSED MERCEDES <o "c>ps, `msT DEALERSHIP q — �• \c \ \ 6 \ \ .ro.¢,m.n.x e1 «1m, a MURRIETA 1' R Bn• — \'t \ \ \ I 1 r.A,mw .I 43 • — 5.36 ACRES I lU a — — _ _ — — — — Amss E—1 1�.. �\ \ GROSS AND NET \ I 2 s v< w x,(ww¢ w roAV, As. iuwx,w, ,w P n..azLS I ro �1, ¢e w 1 L. A. NO O f.nv Irmo-oml mm u .mvKV m nae, ,. ,m, •✓ INS N a 5 \ 1 r 8 I - .. O7 ® 10 38 ACRES 2.82 ACRES 1 .4 ACRES GROSS AC R MD NET 9 �� \\ GROSS AND NET 6.24 ACRES 80 b 4 R wx¢ swlwo . ,x rvv< ,r.,. 1r xws warm ¢,na.on CROSS ANO NET I R GROSS A NET J , is m N A t CSx) I�' 1 K,R INTERSTATE 15 f NAR � b W . It i ._ a ;.. _- -, • LEffIQ (p05e ar 0� erfT,t.a[ � z,u„1wr 1n1,.,e WINCHESTER HILLS 1, LLC � P am H row ,o M ,ncou: u.1a, Soul , rm, [u, ¢ �i.w rp0.6T SIZE Y � i vAl �^ � r s ,>e. F c jM •fib, ,.�`'`'` v,� NAR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP N0. 36336 a V151 T� m� PA 10 -0298 J s �' O• � o..xra,.,v • oc•ivv • cv.,•Twuv�,v:a 40.0 CC4A+fY CBRH1 CPAE EB1fE lb 4 TB.EGW CALFgNA PS9nGM1 CONSULTING 5xmemu ... mn ,5- 1023,9 r SHEET P 1 OF 1 SHEET 3 DH RESOLUTION DH RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0298, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36336 (FOR FINANCING PURPOSES) TO SUBDIVIDE 98 ACRES INTO 17 LOTS IN THE SERVICE COMMERCIAL ZONE IN HARVESTON'S PLANNING AREA 12, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF YNEZ ROAD, EAST OF INTERSTATE 15, AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF DATE STREET Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 14, 2001 the City Council approved the Harveston Specific Plan and EIR. B. On October 14, 2010, John Tanner III with RBF Consulting, filed Planning Application No. PA10 -0298 Tentative Parcel Map Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 6, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA10 -0298 subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA10 -0298, conformed to the City of Temecula's General Plan, Harveston Specific Plan, and Subdivision Ordinance. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No. PA10 -0298, hereby makes the following findings as required by Municipal Code Section 16.09.040. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; The proposed map is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance, Harveston Specific Plan, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. B. The Tentative Map does not divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; The proposed map does not impact land designated for conservation or agricultural use. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The proposed map subdivides 98 acres into 17 lots for financing purposes. No development is proposed with this subdivision. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map design is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Service Commercial zoning designation and the Harveston Specific Plan. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The project consists of a parcel map on vacant property designated for service commercial uses, which is consistent with the General Plan, as well as the Harveston Specific Plan and Harveston EIR. As conditioned, the subdivision is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The project has been reviewed by the Fire, Public Works, Planning, and Building and Safety Departments. As a result, the project is consistent or has been conditioned to be consistent with the City's General Plan and Municipal Code which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The Tentative Parcel Map creates 17 parcels. Prior to the construction of future buildings, the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building and Safety Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided; All acquired rights -of -way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The City has reviewed these easements and has found no potential conflicts. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby); The project does not involve the construction of any residential uses and is therefore not subject to the City's parkland dedication requirements. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Director hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Parcel Map Application: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston Specific Plan EIR and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA10 -0298, a Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 (for Financing Purposes) to subdivide 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston's Planning Area 12, generally located west of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15, and north and south of Date Street, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Director this 6th day of January 2011 Patrick Richardson, Planning Director I, Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that the forgoing DH Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of January 2011. Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA10 -0298 Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 (for Financing Purposes) to subdivide 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston's Planning Area 12, generally located west of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15, and north and south of Date Street Assessor's Parcel No.: 916- 400 -013 MSHCP Category: Per Harveston Specific Plan Development Agreement approved August 14, 2001 DIF Category: Per Harveston Specific Plan Development Agreement approved August 14, 2001 TUMF Category: Per Harveston Specific Plan Development Agreement approved August 14, 2001 Approval Date: January 6, 2011 Expiration Date: January 6, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -5. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99 -0418) as approved on August 14, 2001. PL -6. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 (PA00 -0295) as approved on August 14, 2001. PL -7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. PL -8. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to the Harveston Development Agreement. PL -9. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -10. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -11. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -12. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -13. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on site plan. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. PL -14. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. PL -15. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. PL -16. An Owners Association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL -17. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -18. All parkways, including within the right -of -way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL -19. The CC &Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Temecula Community Services District. PL -20. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by the developer. PL -21. Prior to final map recordation the applicant shall submit a georectified digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information (pursuant to Riverside County standards). The electronic file will be provided ina ESRI ArcGIS compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI) coordinate system. The City must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -22. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -23. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -24. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -25. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. PL -26. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map PL -27. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department. PL -28. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Department. PL -29. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC &Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Director. The CC &Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. PL -30. The CC &Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. PL -31. The CC &Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. PL -32. The CC &Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. PL -33. The CC &Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and facilities. PL -34. The CC &Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. PL -35. The CC &Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL -36. The CC &Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC &Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC &Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. PL -37. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC &Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. PL -38. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC &R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. PL -39. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by the CC &Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. PL -40. An Article must be added to every set of CC &Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA 1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC &Rs for the Parcel. 2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC &Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC &Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC &Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC &Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. 3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC &Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC &Rs. 4. These CC &Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Planning Director of the City of Temecula. PL -41. An Article must be added to every set of CC &Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Parcel Map No. 36336 require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC &Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC &Rs has been limited to a determination of whetherthe proposed CC &Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC &Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC &Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC &Rs. Patrick Richardson Planning Director Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney PL -42. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC &Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and /or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC &Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. PL -43. CC &Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. PL -44. Three copies of the final recorded CC &Rs shall be provided to the Planning Department. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -45. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated October 21, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -46. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated October 27, 2010, a copy of which is attached. PL -47. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit Agency's transmittal dated November 4, 2010, a copy of which is attached. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. All previous existing conditions for this project, Specific Plan, or Development Agreement will remain in full force and effect unless superseded by more stringent requirements here. F -2. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F -3. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. F -4. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. F -5. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for commercial and track home roads and 20 feet for residential driveways with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2, 503.4 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). F -6. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all - weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lb. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5, Section 503.2.3 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020 Section E). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. PW -2. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the Tentative Map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -3. This map is being approved as a Financing Map; therefore no permits shall be issued unless future Tentative Map and /or Development Plan applications are submitted for approval. PW -4. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99 -0418) as approved on August 14, 2001. PW -5. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29639 (PA00 -0295) as approved on August 14, 2001. PW -6. Specific location of access points on Ynez Road and Date Street shall be determined with future Tentative Maps and /or Development Plans. PW -7. A master WQMP (Water Quality Management Plan) must be finalized and approved by the City prior to recordation of the final map, or prior to closing escrow on any of the parcels, or prior to issuance of any grading permit, whichever comes first. The master plan must address runoff from the 17 parcels and associated streets and alleys. Prior to the development of each parcel, Winchester Hills I, LLC, or subsequent owner of Parcel Map 36336, shall install the water treatment devices corresponding to each parcel. PW -8. All onsite drainage facilities, including the WQMP water treatment devices, shall be privately maintained. PW -9. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated August 28, 2001. PW -10. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated August 28, 2001. RIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL— HEALTH 21 October 2010 City of Temecula Planning Department ��T j c/o Cheryl Kitzerow ';' � c PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 RE: PA 10 -0298 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA 10 -0298 for a Tentative Parcel Map 36336 (for Financing Purposes) to permit the subdivision of 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston located west of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15 and north and south of Date Street, under the applicant: Bieri Harveston. The TPM 36336 is similar to other county projects (like TPM 27094, 27905 27814, 28605, 28538 and 2860). Dual water systems shall be provided in any common open space areas for the use of reclaimed water when made available by the water district. A water system shall have plans and specifications approved by the water company PRIOR to Recordation. A sewer system shall have plans and specifications approved by the sewer company with annexation proceedings finalized for sanitation service PRIOR to Recordation. The Assessor Parcel Numbers (APN 916 - 400 -030; 916- 400 -013 and 916 - 400 -018) will require a will serve letter from the appropriate water and sewer company /district to the City of Temecula Planning Department PRIOR to the first PRE -DRC Meeting. The development of the property shall be in accordance with the mandatory requirements of all City of Temecula ordinances and state laws; and shall conform substantially with adopted Specific Plans as filed in the office of the Riverside County Planning Department, unless otherwise amended. In other words, the land division filed for the purpose of phasing or financing shall NOT be considered an implementing development application. If your have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.955.8980 Since Gregor Dellen ach, REHS EHS 100963 Environmental Resources Management • Land Use & Water Resources Street Address: 4080 Lemon Street, 2" Floor, Riverside, CA 92501 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502 • (951) 955 -8980• FAX (951) 955 -8903 October 27, 2010 D V NOV -8 {s Cheryl Kitzerow X010 City of Temecula Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 Board of Directors Lisa D. Herman President SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY — TENTATIVE TRACT MAP Lawrence M. Libeu NO. 36336; APNS 916- 400 -030, 916 - 400 -031, 916 - 400 -032, Sr. vice President 916 - 400 -013, AND 916 - 400 -018; PA10 -0298 HARVESTON Stephen J. Corona BIERI TPM (RBF CONSULTING - TEMECULA] Ralph H. Daily Ben R. Drake Dear Cheryl: John E. Hoagland William E. Plummer Please be advised that the above - referenced property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). The subject Officers property fronts an existing 16 -inch diameter water pipeline (1380 Pressure Matthew G. Stone General Manager Zone) within Ynez Road, an existing 16 -inch diameter water pipeline (1380 Jeffrey D. Armstrong Pressure Zone) within Date Street, an existing 20 -inch water pipeline (1305 Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer Pressure Zone) within Ynez Road, an existing 6 -inch recycled water pipeline N. Craig Elitharp, P.E. D of Operations & ( 1381 Pressure Zone) within Ynez Road, and an existing 6 -inch diameter Maintenance recycled water pipeline (13 81 Pressure Zone) within Date Street. Perry R. Louck Director of Planning Andrew L. Webster, P.E. Water service to the subject project /property does not exist. Additions or Chief Engineer modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Kelli E. Garcia Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the District Secretary C. Michael Cowett completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Where private (on -site) facilities are required for water service, fire protection, irrigation, or other purposes, RCWD requires recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement for such on -site private facilities, where private on -site water facilities may cross (or may be shared amongst) multiple lots /project units, and /or where such `common' facilities may be owned and maintained by a Property Owners Association (proposed now or in the future). Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project /property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances). Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589 -9017 • (951) 296 -6900 • FAX (951) 296 -6860 www.rnnchnwstpr.rnm Cheryl Kitzerow /City of Temecula October 27, 2010 Page Two In accordance with Resolution 2007 -10 -5, the project/property will be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and /or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project- specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project- specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office at (951) 296 -6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Peter Muserelli Engineering Project Coordinator cc: Ken Cope, Construction Contracts Manager Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager Warren Back, Engineering Planning Manager Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Manager 10 \PM:hab021 \F450 \FEG Rancho California Water District 42185 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589 -9017 (951) 296 -6900 FAX (951) 296 -6860 www.ranchowater.com 11/04/2010 15 :53 9515655007 PAGE 02/06 Riverside Transit Agency 1825 Third Street P.O. Box 59968 November 4. 2010 Riverside, CA 92517 -1968 Phone: (951) 565 -5000 Cheryl Kitzerow, Project Planner Fax: (951) 565 -5001 City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula CA 92589 -9033 Dear Ms. Cheryl .Kk7crow, We have reviewed the documents you submitted for the I•Iniveston Bien.' project located off of Ynez Rd, north of Winchester Rd and south of .Elm St. As such, here are our findings /suggestions: RTA currently has service by the site with several stops along Ynez Rd and Equity Dr, and the project could be a potential destination for our customers. As a result, we suggest that public transportation be included as an element as the pmjcet progresses. This includes the following: A. Providing space for buses to stop while not impeding automobile traffic 1. Assure outside lanes area minimum of twenty feet wide where bus stops are planned (See attachment A) 2. Construct turn -outs where outer lanes are less than twenty feet wide 13. Place bus stops in a. secure location to provide ample space for buses to etop (See attachment .B) 1. Construct bus pads to maintain roadway integrity (Scc attachment C) C. Constructing sidewalks that are ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) compliant such that sidewalks connect directly with the curb for all existing and potential bus stops 1. Avoid placing grass between sidewalks and the curb where bus stops are to be located (See attachment D) D. Including installation of bus stop amenities (e.g. shelters, benches, trash receptacles) in the project 1. Placement of bus stop amenities should be considered at locations with high density, retail outlets, and proximity to disabled /senior facilities The scope and details of these i.tems could be determined at a later date. Technical information on bus stops can be found an our website at httn: / /www.riv(!rside"r) Sit.com /a.bout /euidclines.lilM Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, I '- Mark Stanley Director of Planning Riverside Transit Agency Phone: 951-565-5130 Pax: 951 - 565 -5131 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing 1989' =s- A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING DIRECTOR to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA10 -0298 Applicant: John Tanner III, RBF Consulting Proposal: A Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 (for Financing Purposes) to subdivide 98 acres into 17 lots in the Service Commercial zone in Harveston Planning Area 12, generally located west of Ynez Road, east of Interstate 15, and north and south of Date Street. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 15162. Case Planner: Cheryl Kitzerow, (951) 694 -6409 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Great Oak Conference Room Date of Hearing: January 6, 2011 Time of Hearing: 1:30 p.m. PA'10 -0298 Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Director before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Director shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Director, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694 -6409. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0298 Harveston Bieri TPM \Planning \DH NOPH.doc ITEM 2 T J STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA DIRECTOR'S HEARING DATE OF MEETING: January 6, 2011 PREPARED BY: Matt Peters, AICP, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA10 -0152, a Residential Tract SUMMARY: Product Review application for 59 lots at Hemmingway in Redhawk (Tract 23064, Lots 23 -74, 79 -84, and 87) to. be constructed by Standard Pacific. Units range in size from 2,877 square feet to 3,280 square feet and include three plan types with four elevation types. Plan 1, two story, 2,877 square feet (18 units) Spanish (5 units) California Bungalow (5 units) Italian (8 units) Plan 2, two story, 3,032 square feet (21 units) Spanish (8 units) California Bungalow (7 units) Italian (6 units) Plan 3, two story, 3,280 square feet (20 units) Spanish (7 units) California Bungalow (7 units) Italian (6 units) RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Josh Gause, Standard Pacific Homes General Plan Low Medium Density Residential (LM) Designation: Zoning Designation: SP -9, Redhawk Specific Plan G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0152 Hemmingway @ Redhawk RPR \Planning \DH 1 -6 -11 \STAFF REPORT DH.doc 1 Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: 59 Vacant Lots North: Redhawk Golf Course and Single Family Homes South: Redhawk Golf Course and Single Family Homes East: Vacant and Low Density Residential West: Redhawk Golf Course and Single Family Homes Existing /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 4,500 sf min. 4,500 sf min. Total Floor Area /Ratio: N/A N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: N/A N/A Parking Required /Provided:. 2 enclosed spaces 2 enclosed spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. Planning Application PA06 -0101, Hemmingway at Redhawk was approved on November 16, 2006 to entitle Centex Homes to construct homes ranging in size from 2,916 square feet to 3,360 square feet. Centex Homes constructed and sold 49 lots of a possible 108 and then foreclosed on the property. Standard Pacific Homes purchased the remaining 59 lots and on May 14, 2010 submitted a Residential Tract Product Review application. The proposed architecture went through two major revisions. The first submittal included elevations reflecting Standard Pacific's "Next Generation" philosophy, which had never been built in the City of Temecula and included "new" elevations such as Mountain, Continental and Prairie. The second major revision was submitted on October 5, 2010 when new management took over at Standard Pacific and decided to submit elevations similar to those built by Standard Pacific in Wolf Creek and other areas of the City. Standard Pacific hosted a community meeting on July 14, 2010. The applicant reported that the meeting was attended by 12 local residents. According to the applicant, the major issue was economic consistency with regard to size and quality. The summary stated that Standard Pacific expects the City will find that all who attended the meeting were supportive of the project. ANALYSIS The proposed architecture was reviewed for conformance with the Redhawk Specific Plan, as well as for compatibility with the existing homes in the neighborhood. The proposed unit sizes are slightly smaller than the approved units (proposed 2,877 to 3,280 sf vs. approved 2,916 to 3,360); however the architectural styles and enhancements are compatible. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0152 Hemmingway @ Redhawk RPR \Planning \DH 1 -6 -11 \STAFF REPORT DH.doc 2 Architecture The project proposes three floor plans and three distinct architectural styles. The architectural styles include Spanish, Italian, and California Bungalow. All of the proposed architectural styles are consistent with the Architectural Design Manual contained within the Redhawk Specific Plan. The project exceeds all design requirements of the Redhawk Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance which is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods and allows for additional visual variety along the streetscape and within the residential area. Various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style: • Spanish: Smooth stucco finish, concrete 's' the roof, decorative tile vents, decorative foam trim elements, wood fascias and exposed rafter tails, arched and recessed multi- pane windows, arched entrances, and decorative carriage style garage doors. • Italian: Smooth stucco finish, concrete `s' tile roof, decorative shutters and foam trim elements, decorative metal railings, and decorative carriage style garage doors. • California Bungalow: Smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, wood fascias, enhanced outlookers and wood braces, foam trim, stone veneer, wood railings and heavy columns, and decorative carriage style garage doors. The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Articulation is provided on all sides of the homes so that each side of each product provides specific features of the proposed architectural style. Each of the three proposed styles is defined from the others through the use of door and window types, window and door trim, garage door design including windows, materials such as stone, roof type and pitch, shutters and the overall silhouette. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed to incorporate architectural enhancements which include shutters, siding at the gable, and /or additional windows. Building Elements /Mass, Height and Scale The Redhawk Specific Plan requires articulation of wall planes, proportionate massing and scale, and varying roof forms. Each proposed style includes a roofline that varies from the others styles. Staff believes these rooflines provide variety in the street scene and that they are representative of the architectural style. The project includes three two -story elevations, but they incorporate both one and two story elements to help reduce the monotony of two story building elevations. Additionally, reversed floor plans are encouraged to help achieve a distinctive street scene in the Redhawk community. The applicant has incorporated the above mentioned elements and carefully plotted each plan (setbacks and mixing of each plan) with a distinctive combination of regular and reversed floor plans to provide variety along the streetscape and variation throughout the development. Furthermore, each unit includes a front porch to provide additional character along the streetscape. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0152 Hemmingway @ Redhawk RPR \Planning \DH 1 -6 -11 \STAFF REPORT DH.doc 3 Each elevation provides careful articulation and. architectural enhancements. Visual interest is achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials accentuate the various architectural styles. The proposed elevations for this development meet the intent of the Architectural Design Manual contained within the Redhawk Specific Plan. Strong character is achieved on each elevation through the use of a rich variety of enhancements and distinctive design elements. Materials and Colors The project includes six different combinations of building materials and colors for the three elevation styles. The color variation, stucco, and cultured stone serve to break up the massing of the two -story units as required in the Redhawk Specific Plan. 'The variation of material and colors-helps individualize each home and create character in the neighborhood. Each proposed architectural style has two distinct color ,schemes that customize the style. The materials include a variety of roof types, stucco and trim colors, and decorative features. The intent of the Redhawk Specific Plan has been achieved by ensuring a continuity of colors, materials and textures throughout the entire development. Product Placement Plan The proposed product placement conforms to the requirements in the Architectural Design Manual of the Redhawk Specific Plan. A varied and visually interesting street scene has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the design guidelines. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed to incorporate architectural enhancements which include shutters, siding at the gable, and /or additional windows. The lots that require additional enhancements include Lot 1 (side), Lots 30, 31, 56, 57, 72, 73, and 74. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plan. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on December 24, 2010 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Redhawk Specific Plan• EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0152 Hemmingway @ Redhawk RPR \Planning \DH 1 -6 -11 \STAFF REPORT DH.doc 4 The proposed single- family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Redhawk Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. The overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Centex Plans, PAO6 -0101 (Existing Homes) Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0152 Hemmingway @ Redhawk RPR \Planning \DH 1 -6 -11 \STAFF REPORT DHAOC 5 VICINITY MAP D ,rP Q� L 9 AC MONTE VERDE RD �O �p GP PA10 -0152 Ln �n Z. C� mo -o A 0 O Z � Gp- ROMANCE P rh ANZA RD P W m 0 • �� \ � \PM 250 500 2 S T Feet PLAN REDUCTIONS �Yt1111111111YtYYU11111111YUttNItUWY111411111Utt1111111ttYtUlttUU1t11t11YYttttYYW4tYtWIl U1111 Y11 YY4 Y YU1 111 1 �tttUWtttEYYYttUYYt11tYU1tttWU1111U1Ytt4YW YIWIIYYIIIIl YJ I111U4ttW1�111111t11t�tYY11111111111ttU1ttWtllllltl � jYtt ��UIItWYY111111111tttttW�tU1 tY�ttt ..., tttttUWttYttlNUWttW1t11NU11UtttUtt4N1WtWY11�tYYWIttYNtttYU1t11WYWt1tUU1t1111111ttYUlttttl 111111111tttttttUWtttYttY�t11111111Wt4ttlltW TEMECU C ALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 22, 2010 2010208 STAN DARD PACIFIC H OMES Muki, Y.. Right At U.., WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH A R C H I T E C 1 5 I N C. F -- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -- TA" 39'4" 5'4" I ------------- ---------------------------- OPT. BECK j , X, HES M B . is -s' M. BATH 16 ; -3 . s's 1_ FAMILY NOOK Off. FP. , W-10" 15 HERS KITCHEN ------------ El BEDROOM 2 -------- � , � :� W-5" ll'- O" JFWW�RY LINER LOW LINEN TANDEM COATS --- DINING 0 PT. BDRM 6/ HE, IT-l" 12'-6" BATH 4 ' BEDROOM 3 -5;. 11' -0 BATH — 3 u - SERVICE' V ENTRY 17 RDRM 5 OPT. DN BEDROOM 4 j 3 CAR GARAGE ZOL-T -10'4' Milt, --- -th A-— 11, PORCH i L -- — --------------- — - Upper Floor Pl an I Lower Floor FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 1 S 2,077 SF LMER FLOOR 14M SQ F 5 Bedrooms /3 Bath 77 W 14, F. 3- Car Tandem Garage .L 2877 SG F. GAPAGE 714 SQ F. COWA. Ex WMRCH 141 W R L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \J NOTE: SOIJARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD Of CALCULA➢ON w e /it /it It U) a PLAN ONE S - SPANISH FLOOR PLAN A1.1 q WILLIAM HEZ M ALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 A R C H I = T F C T S I N C, .... . . .. . . ......... . .......... . ........ ........................ . . ..... . . ..... ___._____ .................... -------- .... . ... _, :r 1 = 1 _. 1 . __ - BATH 3 BOHM - 6 ENTRY -DEN--- t� AM FD ENTRY �7, PORCH II 1 2 CAR GARAGE 71 20'-2`''x. 20'-3" OPT. BDRM 6/11ATH4 Off. DEN (+ 221 Sn 0.0 0E 0E01.101£ S/BOWB W entmix tv a PLAN ONE - PLAN OPTIONS A .... .. .. WILLIAM HE ALHALCI Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California M,"I November 22, 2010 • 2010208 A R C H i T E C T S I N C. BEDROOM 3 14'-5" - I 1 -0 �1, SERVICE' �R�DM 3" X 14 iA T ENTRY BDRM 5 /DEN BEDROOM 4 3 CAR GARAGE IT-S" • 11'4" FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 11 LOWERFLOORPLAN 14M SO R. SPPEV FLOOR PLAN ", So R. TOTAL IS, so n. o GARAGE 714 SO R. COVERED MTRYPOR0 190 so R. NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO MMOO OF CALCULATION ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR PLAN 11- ITALIAN ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 11- ITALIAN BEDROOM 3 I' BAT SERVICE' ENTRY DORM 5/DEN BEDROOM 4 3 CAR GARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN I B LOWER R-003 PLAN 1400 SO R. UPPER R." ELM 141 So n TOTAL 287 SO R. GARAGE 714 SO F. &M10 WY9am HezmallgltliAmAitecis , Mt. 13MR.E.RYIPORM IN So R. NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD Of CALCULATION ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW W entntiKowa PLAN ONE - ADDENDA FLOOR PLANS Al 2 . . ....... ...... ..... VIA p WILLIAM HEZ P C H I T E C T S I MALHAL C. Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 mn PLAN 1 EXTERIOR COLOR 8 MATERIALS SCHEME a -'S SPANISH SCHEME 2 -'a CN1PORNMBUMiNOx sCNEA•s -T nmamma MTEMy COLOR MNMfACRI1FA COLOR MANUFACTURER CSIOII MMIaACRIMII ROOIM4 3605 EpM SS52 Faqu SCC an Eq. San Bxx 8Mna _ Consrele'S lk Can on G,,y Concrete Snake 111. S,ma Fa Camma *S' TIN Nwo Flea, Palm Malcn fiazu Paim Malcn Flux Pam STUCCO(LINWe Fx ) aw f012W Menx CL 28340 Mole. CL 2744D MxM Cxu BDwl Falcon _ _ Dl TRIM COLOR (,ASNxroI: - E,.,, F", a 1221A ir,zae CL 289M Rama Gaage W. Swl,Mall -- -..._ .....----------- Taxdl Sxmbary Dads m • 1RM DBLDR Ii (aapa rol' a 2xt W Wmawa T_ Gu, FMEx RdN IRM COLM A2 fxANarol: Garage Dom _ C 28311 Frazx M 9xondary Doors I[raWrdD ACCENT COLOR(VA F0) ' CL 298W CL 2537N Front D- S CIL?9 Teme Emma ---- _...._..__.._ Sooner ACCENT COLOR (.11.10)' Frml DOm CL M27N Fasua CIMmNN BrownN Frazx ONI omMDlw, , AWLIfACIWO STOFE Mermnda CMriMe OOmmD ATaNM ELx, NHM ax We B,Ildtlp colors MMwn ex AHrM Concept- Refer b color malenal W.m, AM — Lfedme'a aemplee for more --te colors. Spanish ELEVATION ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE WITH RAFTER TAILS FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIAIBARGE BOARD WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS / WROUGHT IRON AT WINDOW DETAIL GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES r MEDITERRANEAN ELEVATION CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION ®zDtg MnmH,munw n cxeds l ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S" TILE ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS & BRACE FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA WALL: STUCCO WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH - W e nt nt [ it q w a t y PLAN ONE - FRONT ELEVATIONS A1.3 W WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH � Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California X11 mtltldll tl111l l�......... November 22, 2010 x 2010208 m 9e S GlvrmC EM4WL40 WEN Ti as 6OE°QU,IY7: SM MS. BNWICED WIDOW IW�SADOEO • 2 � 3 q e _________.______________ _____ RIGHT � � EMWNCFDNNTEN,AL :ADDED FNUNCED nFCORATK SNORERS, PITS MAKED WINDOW GROG ROOF PLAN "°°E° • SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" Spanish Root Pitch: 4:12 pitch 12" Eave / 12" Rake 3 Spanish ELEVATION FENCE LINE 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE -------------------------------------------------- --------- 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA AND WITH RAFTER TAILS ° 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS - 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS ! WROUGHT IRON AT WINDOW DETAIL 9 GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES ENHANCEDIUETENTALS, DECOMME SHUTTERS A00E0 Pus"Immm sPOS—M 1 7 2 2 • 2 8 5 S 3 8 3 -H 9 -------------------- FENCE 4AIE ______ 8 q f N"ro: M&IIrnNNA a "own Ne A,W COnc"p"an. ,.I Ndu ft ft mdaW REAR O20I ° NN"NE "" ""`"�` FRONT nn °. -ft IWA'A..m p .Im man ncnoldA l w e tx /it L W la PLAN ONE A - SPANISH A1 .4 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCM Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �Il llll lll�lillll lll�llllllll November 22 2010 • 2010208 : C H T a I v IINNNq BONAA FO OURDCKM WN WAGE AID ENHANCED Woww clneAmm 2 � 5 Z 1 4 e 1 ► RIGHT 1 ► ENHANU ADDED ENHANCED emu wRN ADDED W." GRIDS ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" a .; California Bungalow Roof Pitch: 4:12 pitch s 18" Eave / 12" Rake 3 4 5 CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS & BRACE -- - - - - -- ------- ! EBWU NE ---------------------------- _ 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA _ 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE - 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS - - -- 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH ENHANCED AWED RWE GABLE —W DONERS AND BRACE — ADDED WINWW GRIDS . q �S f 2 2 Z 4 5 4 4 3 - H 5 8 Nm Bditg col h o.N.. Arne e — N , W cow metp4l REAR ozB,D wwsn lermenAeN AaNnenc, FRONT n�....� R.wuN...:....ro Rn.aoune w a, PLAN ONE B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW A1.5 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 A I C I I I I I uI N.° III IfgS vl�us wlNnnw cgms n ' 2 7 5 RIGHT Erwnwcm N1NpDw DwDS ADOED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" t Italian Roof Pitch: 4:12 pitch 18" Eave a ITALIAN ELEVATION 1 ROOF EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE REMCe � ❑ a 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA ° 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS, WROUGHT IRON DETAIL ENHANCED DECMMNE SHUMR WITH AODED WINDOW GRIDS 2 2� .S a i ! a (4� n _ ------ _-__ _`_ --- - -------------- -------- - -. ------- - - - - -- -. - ----- IeR,Ai, r�ors. EnlveNlon gierroCOb m�Mbl REAR asolN w�N���HO,malHeme aemrcels, m` FRONT novas .o m.�mau�e s samules ion m�e We ntn ti , itS waS PLAN ONE I- ITALIAN A1 WILLIAM HEZ MALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 P C H I T E C T S un v CC ENHANCED xco- SHIRTpL WDH Roof➢ WMOOM M MS 8 ENMN DECORATIVE HUNG MM WWFCTOML STYLE. TM C" ADDED To oPPER Ml coxr I ---______ " "'- --- __ _ .,, .. � _ ________ 11- ITALIAN RIGHT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: REAR LEFT TUBE STEEL ENHANCEOADOFO RDDF GAR EWTM O�S AND BRACEVATHADDEDM MGMOS ____ ______ ___J ____ FENCE LINE 1B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW RIGHT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: REAR LEFT Wool) ENHANCED RMFA iNLS, DELOMTNE SHIfrtERS ADDED 0.U$ ENHANCED WINDDN GRIDS iWICU --------------- ------ ___- ' ®____ __ FENCE LME IS - SPANISH RIGHT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL REAR LEFT STYLE: TUBE STEEL W e nt nt l ltq w a PLAN ONE OPTIONAL PATIO AND DECK ELEVATIO A1.7 p .uxri.wwyy��M WILLIAM HEZ MALHAL Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �ILMMIII�MMIIIIIfIIIIIMI Nov 22, 2010 2010208 I R m n 1 . w 1N F -- - - - - - - - - - - — - — - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - 5' -2" 39'-0" .--5'-2"- ---- ------- On. DECK On. PATIO IS - M d M. BEDROOM M.BATR 18'-6" - 14'-0" NOOK FAMILY 10'-6" • 16'-1" 18'-7" =15' -1E" OFT. FIR - LINEN HERS KITCHEN SERVICE BEDROOM 2 -Tu i DINING L 11%6" - 10 IRA" IZA" 11-PIWI TANDEM LLJ 114" 16'-3" y COATS BEDROOM 4 1_ I RA PONDE 1 r 1 \ i LINEN TECH - , - I A - - __ - i �' % I Ll_ _L --- --- -ENTRY BEDROOM 3/ On. LOFT BORM SUITE 5/ OPT.DEN 3 CAR GAUGE 12'40"_�_11'4" 21 . ZT-o" Second Floor PORCII 201 W111- H-1—h k.h—, I.. JJ C3 ------ C3 ------ I First Floor ---------- Pl an 2 FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 2S 3,032 SP NI LOWER FLOOR PIAN 1421 SO FT UPPER FLOOR Pun 1611 SO FT 5 Bdrm/3 ' 5 Ba 1111L 3032 SO FT 3- Car Tandem Garage I 1AR11E M SO FT - COVERED ENTW/R CH 168 M OF. REAR PATIO - UPPER DECK (EACH) SO R — - — - — - — - — - — - — NOTE: SCUARE FOOTAGE MAYVARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION W e X t nt [ it GV a PLAN TWO S - SPANISH FLOOR PLAN A2.1 ...... .......... W1111— HEZMALHA�CH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 - 2010208 A . �C H I T E C T S I N C. ................... ............. . .................. . ... . .. J � 1 SfOR �1,� BATH �I Ii BATA _3 I -- BA 2 I ENTRY _ENTRY / _`'' — I I DEN BDRM 5 - 12' -11" * 13'-8" 3 CAR GARAGE Il BEDROOM 3 PORCH PORCH I D 2llill Wi0'wn HesmalAalt�Arthiletis.lnt. OPT. BDRM 3 OPT. DEN OPT. BDRM 5 �a��a�� PLAN TWO - PLAN OPTIONS A2.1 A �q ' "Ywt WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �lllllllll�lllllllli November 22, 2010 2010208 ��:;WCas UI„ 11 11 TECH poiw BEDROOM 3/ iff-V 11'-9" 3-CAR-GARAGE PT. DEN FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 21 1611 so. FT. GARAGE C�w ENTIVIFORCH 156 so R. OF. FEAR PAM - UFFIEN DECK (EACH) so NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DU m METHOD mCALCULATION ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR pLAw21 ITxuxm ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 21 nxuAw BEDROOM 4 BA 2 A g i DORM SUITE S/ OR. DEN.. FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 2B BEDROOM 3/ HAD GARAGE FLOOR PLAN — — 1421 GARM3E 665 so F. N O TE SQUAR FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE m METHOD mCALCULATION ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR PLAN 2B CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 2B' CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW w ent tv vr�� K V�N ���'t������"��� Standard Pacific Homes Temecula California November 222O10,2U1O2O8 PLAN 2 Et3ERNIR COLOR t MATMI&t _ aCEWE 'E SFMIEII iCI1ELE 1.'rC Onw BUNGALOW umm S.T nrawa .:. ., •. „' ... r oms _ COLOR MIWEIFACIURER C" WNWACNRER COLOR MANOFACNFNR AOOFINO: O BB30 Epb SW2 Epla 3680 Epb AI CNprMa'S'3N CZ Band Cmrcnb Sin.. ib Las Pmnn MNa Cppbb'S ine Malcrl".. Palm MMan Fraaa PMa MNCn N¢NPMm C ON..' —) CLC 124M MMN CL 2MQ Msly CL 2]NO Abrlb Unra some RomaNa Sw" TISM DOLOfl fanOld ro) — EaN Faac d CL 2— CL MOM • fanN 0- Wrieel Barrow F— ObwawN F_ wdn,a Doors 3 Trim TMMCOLOR 11 f4paw MP CLMOIW F— WlmlowTam --- .._..._ ELM SMaa TMM COLOR I2 o (applkCrol' wdnd Q. "- C OlMa Frazee SpaMary Oda. --- - ----- NaaebMn Ralf ACCENFCOLOR(ppnea M) CL 2P2]N CL 317M `• F111 Front oor p 2oNe F.. CL NazN D 3 ACC Ddo, (appe0 Po)'. IT I ."'oa°oai GL31M F— Ea es Lead OWOmbrs OFCOMI1EE MflAI _— CL 3226N Ba F __ 1 FREFAe ®BAel2a CL 26B]N F aMl MAxuFADruIER STOW Nom xu" C1nhb N R D"reep MoR ww NnaN 0. Spanish ELEVATION N.I. 110ding.lneNaanan Arb.1C.caplmn Rehr lowlmmaM..I ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE WITH RAFTER TAILS °gems and manual ure s aampbe MF here —10 C"Mn FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA/BARGE BOARD WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS / WROUGHT IRON AT WINDOW DETAIL GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES p r� l ITALIAN ELEVATION CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS 6 BRACE FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA WALL: STUCCO WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH W 16 nL nt l It LU a PLAN TWO - FRONT ELEVATIONS 142.1 Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California II IIIII IIIi1I NIIINiI I....... November 22, 2010 e 2010208 Wfl C I " M HEZ AL HAL I J ENVNCED RAFTER—S8 .,;W Nf SHR'TEAs, MUs Km W1wW GRIDS PDWD 7 � 2 7 c�� 1 l - �_______________ ®________ LINE ________'________ 1 / s I RIGHT ENI GA T.SR ACCENT %f4Sa WLgUTNE SMUrtERS ADDED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" t Spanish Roof Pitch: 4:12 pitch 2 12" Eave / 12" Rake SPANISH ELEVATION ENCE LIRE 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE "S "TILE -' -----------'-----------"------------"-----------'"-'""-- 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL BARGE BOARD /FASCIA WITH RAFTER TAILS ° 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS It 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WITH GLASS LIGHTS 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS / WROUGHT IRON AT WINDOW DETAIL 9 GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES ENHANCEDR— RTALS, DE Co SRMERS AWED P LUS E«twc ®cxloov�GRIDS TwlcnL 1 1 9 2 0 i i l i m �___________ 1 __.________ 1 ; ___________ i i 2 , , I t � 8 � _ i Nate: BUaEbp mlprs ¢NOwn are A— C.... RW Rebabcpb -I REAR ° tea ""`""'°"�`""`""°'�`� FRONT 0oara¢ ana manulictue ¢ sampk¢ , p, mare accuMe cabs. PLAN TWO S - SPANISH A2.4 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 AN C A II TT E C 1 5 1 NC ENHANCEOODILOOIIERS VlRII BRACE vAnl ENxu+GED wxoaw cROS AOOEO 1 Z � ICI _ ! � Il l it S_ ___________ ' , 8 RIGHT ENHAKED OUTTONERS W HBIRKE WITH ENHANCED wxuuw GRlOS ADDED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" California Bungalow Roof Pitch: 4:12 12" Eave / 12" Rake CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION - -- ----- - - - --- . ENC --- - -- - . --- _ _ - EE LINE — 03 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS 8 BRACE � � �----------- - - - - -- -- ----- - - --', ❑ 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA ° 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH ENHANCED WINDOW GRAS AMEO t 1 Z Z 3 4 4 5 S 4 +l E LINE ------ — ___. 9 x Nn1P: R.HEigcolo5 ehe. are AMC ConseplAm. Releito cobr maIMW R,- REAR ®2010 Mien HemiaAakn ArcNecls, M[. roap�p� maMacivessample Igrmort . accu [glass EAR FRONT rN. l�tA l h W A, PLAN TWO B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW A2.5 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California ih November 22, 2010 e 2010208 Ai" '. ®4W ANi I Y N 1i MIDMI wa1�JAYms YMIDIM BAVAM0ECWTNE BIUTTENS A B�WI®TNIBOW 6ND5 1 Z 3 / _, 5 a EENCE LINE ----------- ----------------- r I I r i RIGHT ENNAxcm ExNDDwcww nnDED ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" Italian Roof Pitch: 4:12 pitch —U 18" Eave _ s `+� a ITALIAN ELEVATION _______________ FENCE LINE __. — 3 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE ` ------ - - - - - 1 l7 2 FASCIA: 2X6 FASCIA TYPICAL 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS ENNANDED MNDDW WDSADDED Z z 5 1 A Noh'. Diildn0 colors are Arivl Cau.e N<ler rotorte mahrlai M NoarCS and manuNSlure s sample6lor more accuaae REAR FRO colors W ent nt i xq w a q PLAN TWO I - ITALIAN A2.6 Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �IIIIIIIII�IIIII II II VIII III III November 22, 2010 • 2010208 WILLIAM I'I EZMALHALGH A NC H I T E C TS INC. av9aE fiurFlm fxrtANxG Ens WECT ROECAAAiNE I PEAAP- CNfE A W1 S CGL F ADOEO W�OOW -C AN]TPIN C0.DP ADDED iO IRPEA -CON' 1 FENCE LINE 1. mlD wNUmH im Nak mm�u.Irc 11-ITALIAN RIGHT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: REAR LEFT TUBE STEEL ENMNCED NINDON GPM _______________ _ _ _ -. EENCE LINE I RIGHT 1B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW REAR LEFT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: WOOD ENHANCED RAFTER TARS, ffl N MWAD WNDOW ENDS iW k _____ _____________ __________ __ ____ ______ ________ ____FENCE LINE __ __ _ ____ _ _____ __ __________ _ ___________________ x°R Roml�y.a >..ne.�.n+rca tmaooa� RIGHT 1S- SPANISH ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL REAR LEFT STYLE: TUBE STEEL W e itt Ht i It W R, PLAN TWO OPTIONAL PATIO AND DECK ELEVATIONS 1 Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �I11111111III IIIIIII�NI IIIIIII November 22, 2010 • 2010208 WILLIAM HE T S ILCVNC. , A RC HE - ...,. _,._. RAIp3MlI.W4F Ii tUrtlD WIf.nNG R166U ..�_,..,... .............. _ .. „IT..... _,_.,. ... _ ».. �._...... _....��.,.,..........,....�._. �,. . _,_,....__.�._.�.._,..,....,... , �.,_.,, ....._...., .....,�....,..,..,..�,._. -,. .,..,,_- _. _,..._ m_ e,,... MIN QP ww�tlul.� rMA11fB 1 - - - - - -- -- ------------------ I I 3 9' -6° — - -- - -- T- - -- OPT. DECK. OPT. PATI NOOK 1vanRV; WRATH FAMILY 9' - 16': r is 19' 3" 16'-1" II �i � unen I KITCHEN � His I - LoFr SERVICE " R BDR F 5 I — cB6rs s TADEh1/ � 1 �1 OPT. BO RM 1` 19 -3' 1P-0 " I BA 3 BA 2 I li 1e' s° -0° __• BEDROOM 4 77 BEDROOM _Z i 4 10 10,4 nyr II I I =_ ENTRY _ BEDROOM 3 3_CAR GARAGE U 11' 9" ' 14' -0" A 20' 6" - 23' -0" - --- - - - - -- , BDRM6/ f — OPT. DE _ — fT 12'-S" a 10'-11" Upper Floor - -- ® --� W 2 WRIam llezmalaalc lrc. — — I - - -- Ponce I ° I Pl an 3 Lower Floor FLOOR AREA TABLE Pl 3,260 SF ° LMER ROM RAN 152: UFPEA ROU " - Up to 6 Bdrms/ 4.5 BA/ Lo TOTAL 32M Opt. Bonus Rm Ben Retre t GARAGE 67 COHERED E"MORCH n. 3- Car Tandem Garage GPI. REAR PAM -UR DECK (EACH) - L -------------------- - - - - -- NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD C PLAN THREE B — CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW FLOOR PLAN�� - xux�. WILLIAM HEZMALHALGH Standard Pacific H omes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 A C H II T EE w S IImN C. M. BE DROOM M.REDROOM 1B,_4„ . 164" 10'4" 16'-6" ------------- RETREAT BERM 5 ]EAT 13 U S' 13' MIA t ) 0 BA 2 BA -2 OPT. RETREAT OPT. BDRM 5 Fur U V ENTRY .;I; I J I DEN BONUS RM E -11 1 12'-1" - 134' 16'-2" .10' -10" --1 -J, -, Mid[ I- L PORCH Q -CA 6" � 23'4" OPT. BONUS RM OPT. DEN (+ 175 SF) PLAN THREE - PLAN OPTIONS AM A xux g WILLIAM HEZ M ALHALCH R I E S I Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 201 2010208 C H T C T N C. .. . ........ ... .... . . .................... ... . .... . ..... . .................. - ...... . ... — ................... . . . -ie I �11W BA 3 BA 2 BEDROOM 4 BEDROOM 2 10 _10 "lo '40 LINEN ENTRY BEDROOM 3 UAGARAGE 4 20',-6" x 23'-4" FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 31 LOWER FLOOR PLAN 1523 SO FT. BORM 6 OFF. DU uPF 1757 SO F. ITS' TOTAL 32M SO R. GARAGE R', m R. J L C04RED ENTRYAPORCH 176 so F, OPT FEAR PATIO UPPER DECK (EACH) so, R. - ----- -------- NOTE SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO METHOD OF CALCULATION I of T_ FE 1 7 ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR PLAN 31- ITALIAN ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 31- ITALIAN PD BA 2 Tr_ I , I 771/ BEDROOM -4 u BEDROOM 2 II ENTRY 10 10 2' -5" 11'J HAR GARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE PLAN 3B 20'-6" 23'.4" LOWER FLOOR PLAN 1523 SO R. UPPER FLOOR PUN I'll so 1. 111R.lulull BDRM 6 OPT. BE � TOT& SO FT. GARAGE SO F. cwF. F RT,,/,O OPT REM PATIO -U PPER NOTE: SQUARE FOOTAGE MAY VARY DUE TO MET HOD OF CALCULATION III ADDENDA UPPER FLOOR PLAN 3B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ADDENDA LOWER FLOOR PLAN 3B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW W entntiftowa PLAN THREE - ADDENDA PLANS A3.2 V!p . ...... .. ....... . ... ...... q A I C I I T I � T S I I Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California November 22, 2010 • 2010208 . . .... . ..... . ............. . . .................................. . PUN 3 EZTERIOR COLOR A MATERIALS SCIEIIE a- 'i'SPAXISH iCMFMEZ'1'G1Mi01OLN WMONOW SGIEMEa- 'I'RALMX NATERNAU COLOR NAMUFACfIMMI COLOR MMIBFACMM COLOR MAWfACDIRM IgOLINS, -5 EzpM 5552 Eq. = San E.Q. '•.'.::.. San Baas alu. Cencfae'9' TIX n G. C-ma sh l SMa fe C- ae'S TM Mdc"Fratee Palm Mac I—Pa"p Mac"fR2Aa Palm STICCO RgWMe FA j GLW 1011W M— CL 28510 ANHAN, CL 22ND MaN1 Ca", EOW _ FLmn Olup TTRM COLN lASPAl roY. E— F°cR CLC 1221A H— -- CL 2M React Grape OOa SaamM Tr q.0 Sxatlsl'ODUrs . Tmm TFIM m an II Iv adeela / Wll& ' CL 2260W , TIM Gull F.. - - -- Raul 1MM COLdI 12lMlaearol' az�]N Gmpe DPN MI[ M F.A. Secona Doors mum C M. lappw l0 /'. CL 29MA FmMe CL 25WN Frame Su— S- WKTR9e CNMren ACCW COLOR (Apow my OL r from DPnr F-4 CL 262714 f— Eave Ouuoolam FF MMNKA =STONE Mapamu, CMPOm Elft, _ Nola. Buddag colors sl°wn are Arlml Conrophon Reier M rotor material W.M. am.— fadum'S SamPlee for mom aca.I. colors Spanish ELEVATION ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE WITH RAFTER TAILS FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIABARGE BOARD WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS / WROUGHT IRON AT WINDOW DETAIL GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES I ITALIAN ELEVATION CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION ° 201a wmem HMmMNkNAmM e."a ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE'S' TILE WITH RAFTER TAILS ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS & BRACE FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA FASCIA: 2)(6 TYPICAL FASCIA WALL: STUCCO WALL: STUCCO TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE FRONT DOORS: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH lL Q, PLAN THREE — FRONT ELEVATIONS A3.1 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�IIIIIIII November 22, 2010 • 2010208 - :ae ITT FF as a uuu N C a EINNILED Ra1T[A Ta s a°DED 6 DECDRATNE SNIrtTE11S. KA ' ENIaNDm WNODW GWDS TVRLaL 7 2 ° ________ _______ ____________ ___________ FENCE LINE ' RIGHT ENHANCED Herrin TWLS ADDED PWs ENHANCED.NG(AN °w°S —I AL ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" Spanish Root Pitch: 4:12 pitch 12" Eave / 12" Rake s SPANISH ELEVATION 2 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIAIBARGE BOARD WITH RAFTER TAILS 3 WALL: STUCCO - - -- - 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE Q j 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS ® LEFT 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS 9 GABLE: FOAM ACCENT PIPES ENHANCED- 11R .ILS. DECORATNE SHUTTERS ADDED PLUS ENHANCED NINOOW GRIDS MUL 7 ° • ° • 2 . ; z . +I • III�r EE°CEPK 7 Np RNEEkycatmss ""wnartA—Lenceptk".Re,,ronIN,1 -1 REAR .M. FRONT LoArds anN manWacN<s samOks toy mine accurate colors. GV Q. PLAN THREE S - SPANISH A3.4 'ill Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California i L t l L t t t l L i E E t L t t t l L i t l L t t t t t i November 22, 2010 • 2010208 WILL ANC IAM H E C i ° HE T S I N C CH T ENIMECED OD ERS WITH BRACE AND ENHANCED wra" GRIDS ADDED 1 / 1 _ 2 3 1 / 5 _ I / RIGHT ENH ACED ADDEDR" GABLE WITH DIMEPOKERS MBD ENHANCED BRAGOM WITH ADDED WWDDW fPIDS ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8"= 1' -0" California Bungalow Root Pitch: 4:12 12" Eave / 12" Rake s� CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ELEVATION 3 1 ROOF: EAGLE ROOF: CONCRETE SHAKE FLAT TILE WITH ENHANCED OUTLOOKERS 6 BRACE 2 FASCIA: 2X6 TYPICAL FASCIA 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 STONE: MANUFACTURED STONE VENEER AT ENTRY PORCH LEFT ENHANCED WRDDKERS AND BRACE WRH ADDED WWDDW GRIDS A 2 5 4 5 4 8 7 N& BNMNMB colors sham We ArWI Co cII Rder W Odor mBIeREt • Pm0 WwIM»nWYeN ArnNWdn, Inc. m.W m, "In n ARmRN.InrmW.rrNr� REAR FRONT W ent nti it W a PLAN THREE B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW A3.5 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California � I I I I 1 1 I E 1 � 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I � November 22, 2010 • 2010208 A R C H I T E C T S u I INC - _------ ________- _-- _- __- -_- BOMB DECORATIVE SHUTTERS ADCED W I Ex GRIDS TYPICAL 2 — a 5 + RIGHT Enuxrm wioovl mes ADD® ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/8 "= 1' -0" Italian Root Pitch: 4:12 pitch 18" Eave 3 1 ITALIAN ELEVATION .: - - - -.. U ........... l r� - - -- oa 2 R O O F: AS 2X6 TYPICAL CON "S" TILE v .... _ _ . _ .. - - -II ❑ 3 WALL: STUCCO 4 TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM TRIM FOAM SHAPE PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 5 WINDOW: WHITE VINYL WITH EXTERIOR GRIDS 6 GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS WITH ENHANCED GLASS WINDOWS 0 7 FRONT DOOR: FRONT DOOR PATTERN PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE 8 ACCENTS: DECORATIVE SHUTTERS LEFT ENHANCED DECOFAIIVE SNUITEPS 1. AND WIND -GRIDS ADDED 2 �- B 4 4 FENCE LINE 7 - i Nnm. Rnildlnp r.olnr� shown are nr,lt, Conepbn. Neler b cdPE mE1MPl O MID Wien NvrtuAUkA Art:NNCb.lnc. ....... n,ar,nae re,zam „ea mRa.«NEba REAR FRONT l lL Gil R, PLA THREE I - ITALIAN A3.6 Standard Pacific Homes November 22, 2010 2010208 WILLIAM HEZ MALHAL(C Temecula, California �R� NC FINANCED DEC0- SFU . WDH AIDED WNDDW GNUS A ENNNCED DECDRAM gpIING PEA MCEDECTURAL SME TNN CRORADDEDICU WCONY - --- " "-- " " - - -- FENCELINE h, RIGHT 31 - ITALIAN ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: REAR LEFT TUBE STEEL EHN m ounoGNFRs ANDwcE WITH ADDED N N]oW GRIDS I CAL IJ _ __. -_.._ _ __. ,- FENCE LINE _______________ __ ___________ _ A RIGHT 3B - CALIFORNIA BUNGALOW ENHANCED DECK HAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: REAR LEFT WOOD ENHANCFD RAFTER TAU OECDRAINESHUTTFRS ADDED RUS ENIANCED WNDDW GRIDS MICAS • ______ _ _ _ f2 LNE p;m; �; ..,., 3S - SPANISH RIGHT ENHANCED DECK RAILING PER ARCHITECTURAL REAR LEFT STYLE: TUBE STEEL wentAtilt3wa PLAN THREE OPTIONAL PATIO AND DECK ELEVATIONS A3.7 WILLIAM HEZ—LHAL Standard Pacific Homes Temecula, California �IIIIIIIII�IIIII,III�......... November 22, 2010 2010208 A R C AN m 1 N C ' ^ OWNER AND APPUCANT LEGEND PROJECT STE LrnLMES ELEVATION SYMBOL LEGEND SCHOOL DISTH LOT SUMMARY LOT SUMMARY 4 SETBACKS PHASAGLOT 9- 411 0 58 '84 27 28 32 31 70 79 76A TYPICAL PLOTnNGS TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE DETAAL FLm Am i PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES TRACT No.23064 —�— CITY OF TEMECULA Od Sheet 1 of 3 " 53 I'__ •. i 0 lie S _ AdSLAA a =�`• ii�- ���.. .,,,LLL--- \,,,r���11Jd, "'•\..•` f -- ��� I \:�i`\ S���\ F��L. \ \\ \F\1 r cV ,A v � \,�v y't�� Aa vv �{vA A.v�A 1 {v AII?r� � \ ft 11Avv � v � + V �� " {� . i AC IC 1\ \\ i \ 7\ 7 \rIC 1 I L 410 \, ,\ \ \ ` , � 1. \\\ \ \� \, fit•- ��tir , VA vA6 i ^ v v. , \ �v\ �A v v A ' .�1.�\ \1103 - ..'{ I -� - S" a ` -A 9B� ulv v\ AAA \• vA V' v k7,aL -=J �\ � � v `� t \,,;h,. , VA .,' LEGEND H_EVA710N 3OMBOL LE(;EIID � oRry ,c ,awns �. �., �. _[.„,��.,.v...,„,�«c ..[ ®•_ .�.,[,[ nmx,µ 6 ©%,.,,,.n„ PA10 -0152 m..,r HEMMINGWAY AT REDHAWK GRAPHIC SCAI.e — xuw,uu,viwuxrxniu. ° "` ® n.w, w "°m'u''r^un .u,aun�wa.v,iu,nax ______ _[vx,vc[um.umvsw[.u, m im ------------ _mxv„rvsscvru,.u[ AMnJCMff MGMM OF W PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES NYi TRACT No. 23064 U INLANII 51 I CITY OF TEMECULA Sheet 2 of 3 _- IIII I I� Bp 83 / y fpj r (' ® I\ t zn7 ®' ®' ®. � ,�1 ;, 1\�• �� - s. � � \ i ��` ,off :. - ., c�;•r `°�, �-` - :a- a`� A i -... ®,._� I `� t` { t } ` ,r, 0 1 ,7 0 - css° { �_ 1 L__ L_ � �_ � s•r r <c � �� - 7f � � � N ��. 4 ^ ' 37 36 ✓1 �.0 \:.. - 31 I t a i TS 28 17 TB T9 30 } 1,` \ - --7 t ••... `I, i / T Ilta \ � 19 ! \ z9 � \ l,\ I � � �:�:,.' =� �= ::�' ,..ro I° � �, I I I �� � r� �_:- -- II C � •` : U \ \ ♦ � � \. ter a' ^� � � �T"8. },1 y 'd -a� \ b �-•'\ i \},'.'si �' ��� r� .® ®� r® ® r® ®l n, �' :; },. ���,\ .� v� 1 - 1 � y i \ � �y ___� s__ �A _ _✓ --- -' �_ c�t/ I ' � �-- _.... i ii -. it � I' 1 ' ��^ I \ j -.'�` 1 •. \ Ptia �'' r , � v:I � L ' ` tom \ ��:: I i� h _ \ '�, ��, ; } I �.,�t .� ; ., 1 R_ § � � .�, • a�," -m- °• ,� �.:` III "� , __ 1 O O 79 rol III iIl 1 .- a'. \ ♦ ♦'� 81 83 HT {� \� \ '{ \ 99�`\ { 8B_•b --_ 87:�E6�85. 87 80 109 .. ,90 \ rte.= . --�-" ....•.__ ,— / I �j II I 1 -- LEGEND ELEVATION SYMBOL LEGEND F ORT w - w,...n,.a .m,,,..�,�,a,,,,c. .••..- .,.y.....o,., ®.,., yw, ©,v PA10 -0152 GRAPHIC SCALE .,.._ _ ;� "�• ®�w:� -w HEMMINGWAY AT REDHAWK I �._ Wo PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN STANDARD PACIFIC HOMES TRACT No 23064 INLAND U.NYI R1: UIVI$IUN CITY OF TEMECULA Sheet 3 of 3 CENTEX PLANS (EXISTING HOMES) a` Y 0 PLAN 2916 PLAN 3233 PLAN 3360 PLAN 3393 TRADITIONAL SPANISH CRAFTSMAN SPANISH CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - FRONT STREET SCENE Scale: 1/8" = F -0" ICENTEX HOMES E M M I N G W A A Y T R E D H A W K Inland Empire Division H KTGY GROUP, Pr—, (951) 419-9700 1285 Carona P—ie Fa. (951)419 -9$94 Carona. CA 92819 T e m e c U I a , C a I 1 f O T P 1 a -» KTGY 20031088 Ilk `v PLAN 3393 PLAN 3360 PLAN 3233 PLAN 2916 SPANISH CRAFTSMAN SPANISH TRADITIONAL CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - REAR STREET SCENE Scale: 1/8" = 1 -0" CENTER HOMES Inland Empire Division HEM M I N G WAY AT R E D H A W I{ KTGY GROUP, P—e 1951 `f 14799300 Fa. 1951)479 -9394 ,v �a Ca �IHi_� T e m e c u I a C a I i 1 o r n KTGY 20051088 r ( t A f t UO Patio Patio N Plan 2916 Plan 3233 Plan 3360 Plan 3393 Porch Porch Por h Porch iE s \ s 0 � CONCEPTUAL PLOT PLAN Scale: 1/8" = V -0" CENTEXHOMES H EM M I NGWAY AT REDHAWK Inland Empire Division KTGY GROUP. INC. Pht— (951)479 9300 1285 C-- Pd Me . F8. (951)479.9394 Corona. CA 92879 T e m e c u l a , C a l i f o r n i a 0 Ir CTOY 200SI0p COLOR CHART PLANS . a r.ra.�wN t• w. w..wrw1 ON�.wN � �... ...rrraw rr o..w.rw . i 1) Dw.ndw TIN Vow .nor wmrwaw 2 , DNawlw L.a.n w.Nwr / Mood Fwcw rrr.ow, 'r" • r - '1 Light Low &— Pl.rh rwrrar wswwta tr wwrtwr .trrrr .; Concrrw 5 TIM Roof craw o..arwrw orNSwrw T r.rrw.r o.m.rts wwfew w.irwN i I '{)D. 11. Pa.. W. 4 w+ww� wwlrr �'f! M-1 Saoti o.l G.M. Door ra.r r.+ e..wrwN ' d Pend Omt Staoao R.w ott000t .raw..r mw.wwrw ww.rwwr s.r.rw wwttwr d -.. —wo,— --000r I wsrrr rrr i 7 . car w w rrr �8. FRONT ELEVATION "A" - SPANISH O I ceRw.w no TD. Roof 1, ' I wood Kam ig— O7 Woad P." ;'2 '2' v.nkal wood Swloj D.aw.th. Began 7 D.ron1M Sh.a.n O OI who Low at— WOW! wrh 7 �1 WOW! FNCi. 2 O DNawM lows film ,�4 ,, S D-11" Pam Td. © NOW B.atleW Gowan Door O \ : Cones Plot Tile goof rlet v..w `�� (t) Light two. Smoot, Flare i/l�I �j WoW Rwft _ ..� .. _ ( �S) MaW S.awul Ou.p Dow Woad M L Trigg f C.d.nd Stow V.ww !it,) Wow "win 9 !ii) Bwooral Wong C.1— i Y R ) i g` `8 FRONT ELEVATION "B" - TRADITIONAL FRONT ELEVATION "C" - CRAFTSMAN CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - PLAN 2916 Scale: 1/4" = P-0" CENTEX HOMES H E M M I N G W A Y A T R E D H A W K KTGYGROUP, Inland Empire Division _ IS PI—o (95114M9300 I 1265 oronCaraw Panty • v i F.. (951 479 9394 C a . CA 92879 T e m e c u l a . C a l i f o r n i a 0 ..:•�.••• n. wr sns KTQY 2005.1088 COLOR CHART Oi cat er«. 6 n, aaet PLANS •� 2O O2 Drwr,o TH. Y. r••e ]O road Pre, wrOrr�p atwrrr �wr uw+..sr rusrr err. O O Drwr,o u.ttr a.�e... wear w+rrrt rrti O OS Light law star PWra w�wur.w 4 -- �� © Doom,. Pam Trim 0 7O Mml toWorl Ornet Door trwrsa.r osawrw O p.d Dr sh aru o�rsrr rrr �..rt.... rr atssRwr o.�a.w lw.r L.r. s.srw rr , ` 1 v ri.r mrr.euw — r ww as.r.raw wrrew � wwwa rm asrrraw aamraw 8) uwurrr aYM w.e. w.,. FRONT ELEVATION "A" - SPANISH hilt (2 j '; J� Coxtw PW TIN door U Carw, PW n, aaar ,2) rope 1, 11 0 / rood Prc, `) V." rope SMlne O LJ D—fi. baot,n raM Pre, O Light Lw Stuwo ROM (\= / � Drwriw BYuttm 0 S D-1hv Pam Td. `s� �6� Light !aw Sn— P„! `6J Mw1 Soatbul Ouop Door Cj "7) D.owrl.. — nln -C4) (77) arlct Vrwr 18) M.W Sicti—a Ounp Door V' rope Pow a rnr 9) CWrr Stwo Va.w O9 rood galling `, BntW d rood CW.— 8 O Il� C? i `IJ Drrrin Fom PasEdt J rope a,l".e (6) / (� T` FRONT ELEVATION "B" - TRADITIONAL FRONT ELEVATION "C" - CRAFTSMAN CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - PLAN 3233 Scale: 1/4" = 1' -0" CENTEX HOMES HEMMINGWAY AT REDHAWK Inland Empire Diweton KTGY GROUP..... Phan. (95t)t79 -9300 I tY65 Corona Pomia N Fu (9511479.9394 Co-- CA 92979 T C ]']'� C (` u 1 8 r C $ I 0 i 1] A O""iw r.rr W w.w.ww.e KTGY 200S -1088 0 COLOR CHART OI Dww d. Tla Vet PLANS wn� e ia w� taraw O cmam 8 m leer aama. wgar iq.o.w.w o.asww e»�,W a.rrreq _.— _- 2 Ohs ~qn e..ro.w wasww sawnW eeawew O LAW Lr am— F.MY 4..r. osawmww awra. o »sRwo 3 O3 DeeamlR lau TaWNf rw.�r eaasww . ©Wood PweM -O O1 Daewmlw 111 m Trlm r.w w. xw lrwrrra wsw.we w44w wwaw. O s 011atal tatlteaal 0w4 Door 1.rrew deasww wa�RW aea4w Rae x..r>raw oalwwae w+�rrw ^ f AfRd Ow twwo am 6 swriar w.wwae oiaw4wW waw,raw r>raw. m.wa0e waa... rwl Q $� 7 .w. wr.4r a. ve +sRaw II Y /-� aawrraw ®.wrw �/ revue• w ve.erw ewrr O rareR oar FRONT ELEVATION "A" - SPANISH OI ca.waw Plw TIM leaf OI ce.etm. PW T0a lad O D—.dw BNbwa { 7) O Mead Kw bw O1 U& Law Raew PMMY O lO V." Mad sm" O Mad ft" 8htgn O Dawtwlw pew Trim O Licht taw !loam Piwb O 6 M" to dmW Gaw Deer Dwwatiw Pwm pwrhrlf D C band B" vow ///�3 O7 Mad paaala O Mad fkw a TAw Dawaatlw Pew TAw O !O Ned laitlad O O cC.IW faas el O Door am. Mod Colawo l2W Mod RW-9 _ - - IF-7 F �C _7C n 12 — FRONT ELEVATION "B" - TRADITIONAL FRONT ELEVATION "C" - CRAFTSMAN CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - PLAN 3360 Scale: 1/4" = F -0" CENTE HOMES H EM M I N G W A Y AT R E D H A W K KTGY GROUP Inland Empire Division Phase (951) 479 -9309 1265 Carona Pww a . Fax (951)479 -9394 Corona. CA 92879 T e m e c u l a r C a l i f o r n i a KTGY 2005.1088 COLOR CHART OI Cinswota S Tile Roof PLANS wra rs•usr O D-1— Tik Van, O LI& Lam S— Finish w s•rsrwN arw srwr.wr wsrow rwws.rsr. r�irr Ona,uaw sN wswaoww ©Daaontlra Shutten rw r wwrw r orasse w wuw -0 O Mood Fud• D•siruhe Pam Tnm r osaos aw sNSrr i i 1 O1 MMal Secii—I Gmg, Door �wNSrer arsw•war awraNr nw aw.rr OB P—d Om S— Bass erww.ros..• a� s +waver osrrww Nw• 4 O D•aontivc Foam P.AW wrrsr o�ww•e ssswwNwr wrr.saw ror sa�wrwaaa� // w w�fr art anwwa.wN ra•rN aver WaNaaYN -.� ( 1 s..rw r v 0 a.r ooa ` tatasw ar r • s...w esrr..•.rrr wwwrr 7 �� w..rr rs—ii s.sr ssww arr `,J w rw w. I J FRONT ELEVATION "A" - SPANISH O C-- Flat Tile Root /\ O R CualCa Wood F.. B8- 7 1 1 O ale Flat Tile oof O V-1.1 Wood Sidi.{ �j�J O3 Wood K— B.. O Light I-- Stucco Finish J J O VWUMI Wood Siding O S Dsonthe Sh O O Light Lam Stucco Finish O 6 Wood Fsscia 3 O Dmisinve Sh.— Z O Deronlivc Foam 7'nm O Wood Fula O Moral 5•ctio.•I Omw Door - - - l 1 O7 DMmti,a Fwm Trim `J OB MM•1 Section•1 G•r•ge Door Cnllured S—. ve.wr s aR.na stnna ven «r 6 I 7 �9 FRONT ELEVATION "B" - TRADITIONAL FRONT ELEVATION "C" - CRAFTSMAN CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION - PLAN 3393 Scale: 1/4" = F -0" CENTEX HOMES H E M M I N G W A Y A T R E D H A W K !�TQ'Ya::: Inland Empir Division Pnorse. (957)47 9.9709 t2BSComr xPoints, F. �a F- (9511 aaw a � cnron., C A 92879 T e m e c u l a C a l i f o r n i a K TGY 2005•I0M \ Id 4 b I II T➢L ° Id A' -�.II III /�.B➢4 �_ - - -_ _ — —_1_�� Yb' 1 p6 �� \\ �I i 8 Bl Dp -------- -------- \ ' i l, III Dr ! � � � :I ..� � L b � \ � / � - - 1 n 11 I II, I r< ➢r u D a x r r r _ a` 11 I r< TT ➢r a r — etis. �--- -�. `/ i� �".II ,•II ..n ..., „°` R" s o N Too 150 no III B il,ll m 1 '^ 1 111.1 ° LS - ---------------- SC E I -W I I ze '. -- _- .D I - �41 = PLANTING PLAN IRRIGATION NOTE: • w..^• -^^^+ ,w m, ALL SLOPE LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE . o �• «..� w , TO BE IRRIGATED WITH 100% COVERAGE THROUGHOUT. STREET TREE L—D [ALL TREES 15 Hemmingway - PRIVATE SLOPE LANDSCAPE S O D T'H W I C K G U Y B E T T E N H U S E N I N C REDHAWK — TRACT 23064 — TEMECULA, CA. D t g8�ic i lo8r ^c .. ogbncro.. ARE a l � � ��� �� ��,.®�' ,:.��♦ � �� � ° _� �-► : ON ff Nei - C� VIII t'Sv Imo' J e' • DH RESOLUTION DH RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0152, A RESIDENTIAL TRACT PRODUCT REVIEW FOR THE REMAINING 59 LOTS (OF 108 BUILDABLE LOTS) AT HEMMINGWAY IN REDHAWK (PLANNING AREA 4, TR 23064) TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC, GENERALLY LOCATED BETWEEN DEER HOLLOW WAY AND REDHAWK PARKWAY ON CAMINO RUBI AND CORTE MISLANCA Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 14, 2010, Adam Smith on behalf of Standard Pacific Homes, filed Planning Application No. PA10 -0152, Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Director, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 6, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City, staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Director's Hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Director approved Planning Application No. PA10 -0152, subject to Conditions of Approval, after finding that the project proposed in Planning Application No. PA10 -0152, conformed to the City of Temecula's General Plan, and the Redhawk Specific Plan. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Director, in approving Planning Application No. PA10 -0152, hereby makes the following findings as required by Development Code Section 17.05.010F, Development Plan. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed single - family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Redhawk Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; The overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to. be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Director hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Redhawk Specific Plan EIR and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Director of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application_ No. PA10 -0152, a Residential Tract Product Review for the remaining 59 lots (of 108 buildable lots) at Hemmingway in Redhawk (Planning Area 4, TR 23064) to be constructed by Standard Pacific, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Director this 6 th day of January 2011 Patrick Richardson, Planning Director I, Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary of the Temecula Director's Hearing, do hereby certify that the forgoing DH Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Director of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6 th day of January 2011. Cynthia Lariccia, Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA10 -0152 Project Description: A Residential Tract Product Review application for 59 lots at Hemmingway in Redhawk (Tract 23064, Lots 23 -74, 79 -84, and 87) to be constructed by Standard Pacific. Units range in size from 2,888 square feet to 3,406 square feet and include three plan types with four elevation types. Assessor's Parcel No.: Portion of Tract 23064 (Lots 23 -74, 79 -84, and 87) MSHCP Category: Residential 8 DU or Less DIF Category: Residential - Detached TUMF Category: Residential - Single Family Approval Date: January 6, 2011 Expiration Date: January 6, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the.two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed within 30 days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 9, Redhawk Specific Plan. PL -7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Redhawk Specific Plan EIR. . PL -8. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -9. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -10. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose. down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -11. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -12. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. PL -13. The project shall meet all applicable Conditions of Approval for Tract Map 23064. PL -14. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the City or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and /or conditions consistent, with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. PL -15. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20'x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than eight inches above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. PL -16. Prior to construction of the Model Home Complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home Complex Permit. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -17. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -18. Precise Grading Plans should indicate locations of enhanced elevations. These include Lots 30, 31, 56, 57, 72, 73, and 74 Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) . PL -19. Building Construction Plans shall include a note identifying all lots with enhanced elevations (see Condition No. PL -18 above) PL -20. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -21. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -22. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -23. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation installation with open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head - to -head coverage, and to verify that all planting have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -24. Automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. PL -25. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and fencing materials. PL -26. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -27. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -28. Roof- mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -29. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use'and occupancy is not required for the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL -30. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -31. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL -32. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL -33. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -34. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way. PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls and permanent post- construction water quality protection measures into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water. PW -6. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Redhawk Specific Plan 217 as approved on October 6, 1988, and its subsequent amendments. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -7. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW -8. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW -9. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW -10. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW -11. The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW PPP) shall be available at the site throughout the duration of construction activities. PW -12. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies.. PW -13. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW -14. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -15. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW -16. The project shall demonstrate the pollution prevention BMPs outlined in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. PW -17. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. PW -18. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -19. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -20. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING V" h ■ e Nonce of Public Hearing 89 :,..,. A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING DIRECTOR to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA10 -0152 Applicant: Josh Gause, Standard Pacific Proposal: A Residential Tract Product Review application for 59 lots at Hem mingway in Redhawk (Tract 23064, Lots 23 -74, 79 -84, and 87) to be constructed by Standard Pacific. Units range in size from 2,888 square feet to 3,406 square feet and include three plan types with four elevation types. Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Redhawk Specific Plan EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Case Planner: Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 Place of Hearing: Great Oak Conference Room, 41000 Main Street Date of Hearing: January 6, 2011 Time of Hearing: 1:30 p.m. P PA10 -0152 - - - - -- -- a 250 soa � Feet MTT=TTr MT Notice of Public Hearing Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Director before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Director shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Director, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner at (951) 694 -6408.