HomeMy WebLinkAbout080311 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please
contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
PRELUDE MUSIC:
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
AUGUST 3, 2011 — 6:00 PM
Earlene Bundy
Commissioner Guerriero
Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 20, 2011
1
Next in Order:
Resolution: 11 -50
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon
colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission
Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time
limit for individual speakers.
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action..
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
2 Planning Application Nos. PA11 -0127 and PA11 -0129, a multi - family residential
Development Plan for Portola Terrace to construct 45 affordable apartment units and a
parking structure on 1.53 acres, and a Certificate of Historic Appropriateness to remove
the Arviso House from the Historic Register, located at 28671, 28673 and 28701 Pujol
Street, Cheryl Kitzerow
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0127, A
MULTI - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PORTOLA
TERRACE TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY APARTMENT COMPLEX
CONSISTING OF 44 AFFORDABLE UNITS, ONE MANAGER'S UNIT, AND A
TWO -STORY PARKING STRUCTURE ON 1.53 ACRES. ASSOCIATED CASE
INCLUDES PA11 -0129, A CERTIFICATE OF HISTORICAL
APPROPRIATENESS TO REMOVE THE ARVISO HOUSE, LOCATED AT
28681 PUJOL STREET, FROM THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES MAP. THE
ENTIRE PROJECT SITE IS ADDRESSED AS 28673, 28681 AND 28701
PUJOL STREET. (APNS 922 - 062 -003, -004, -005).
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, August 17, 2011, 6:00 PM City
Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's
Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600
Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the
Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review
at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission
meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's
website atwww.cityoftemecula.orq.
2
PRELUDE MUSIC:
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
ABSENT:
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
JULY 20, 2011 — 6:00 PM
Earlene Bundy
Commissioner Carey
ACTION MINUTES
Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio
GUERRIERO, HARTER
Next in Order:
Resolution: 11 -40
1.1 Approve the Minutes of July 6, 2011 APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE
REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
2 CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 2011 (at applicant's request): Planning Application No.
PA10 -0309, a Development Plan for a two- story, 89,148 square foot senior congregate
care facility with 94 units consisting of studio and one bedroom units, generally located
on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Moraga Road, Eric Jones
APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER KIGHT; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, HARTER
ABSENT
1
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-40
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10 -0309, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A TWO- STORY, 89,148 SQUARE
FOOT SENIOR CONGREGATE CARE FACILITY FEATURING 94 UNITS
CONSISTING OF STUDIO AND ONE BEDROOM UNITS GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA
ROAD AND MORAGA ROAD (APN 944 - 290 -025)
3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0069, an Antenna Facility Application to allow a cellular
facility disguised as a street light to be located within the public right -of -way generally
located on Pechanga Parkway directly across from Via Gilberto, Eric Jones
APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO,
HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-41
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0069, A
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW
A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREET LIGHT TO BE LOCATED
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
PECHANGA PARKWAY DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM VIA GILBERTO
(CLOSEST APN 961- 020 -027)
4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0085, a Wireless Antenna Facility to be located on a
new 29.5 foot high tubular steel light pole within the right -of -way along the south side of
Wolf Valley Road, approximately 283 feet east of the centerline of Pechanga Parkway,
Eric Jones APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND
BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO,
HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-42
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0085, A
WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY APPLICATION TO ALLOW
A CELLULAR FACILITY DISGUISED AS A STREETLIGHT TO BE LOCATED
WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF WOLF
VALLEY ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 283 FEET EAST OF THE CENTERLINE
OF PECHANGA PARKWAY (CLOSEST APN: 962 - 010 -007)
5 Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0226 and PA11 -0053, a Development Plan and
Variance for Chaparral 3, a proposed 23,137 square foot, mixed use, three -story
building with retail /restaurant uses on the first floor and mezzanine, and offices above.
The Variance request is to reduce the setback at northeast property corner, as well as
the parking setback and landscape requirement along the western property line. The
project site is addressed as 28455 Old Town Front Street, Cheryl Kitzerow APPROVED
3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER
KIGHT; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA10 -0226 AND
PA11 -0053, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR CHAPARRAL 3,
A PROPOSED 23,137 SQUARE FOOT, MIXED USE, THREE -STORY
BUILDING WITH RETAIL/RESTAURANT USES ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND
MEZZANINE, AND OFFICES ABOVE. THE VARIANCE REQUEST IS TO
REDUCE THE SETBACK AT NORTHEAST PROPERTY CORNER, AS WELL
AS THE PARKING SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENT ALONG
THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE. LOCATED AT 28455 OLD TOWN FRONT
STREET (APN 922 - 026 -041
6 CONTINUED FROM JUNE 15, 2011: Planning Application No. PA11 -0112, a
Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete
street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan
(Node TM -18) in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the northwest side of Southern
Cross Road, across from Sky Terrace Drive, Matt Peters CONTINUED OFF -
CALENDAR; APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO,
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL;
GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
3
7 CONTINUED FROM JULY 6, 2011: Planning Application No. PA11 -0109, a Conditional
Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole
as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -13) in
the City of Temecula right -of -way on the south side of Rancho Vista Road,
approximately 202' southwest of the centerline of Camino Romo, Matt Peters
APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO,
HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0109, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL
A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS
WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NOTE
TM -13) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF RANCHO VISTA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 202' SOUTHWEST OF THE
CENTERLINE OF CAMINO ROMO
8 Planning Application No. PA11 -0114, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install antenna facilities on an existing joint use wood utility pole as part of its
wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -20) in the City of
Temecula right -of -way on the east side of Moraga Road, approximately 510' south of
Rancho California Road, Matt Peters APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE
REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-45
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0114, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO
INSTALL A NEW 40' CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS
WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE
TM -20) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE EAST SIDE
OF MORAGA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 510' SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD.
4
9 Planning Application No. PA11 -0118, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless
distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -26) in the City of Temecula
right -of -way on the south side of La Serena Way, approximately 90' east of Calle Pina
Colada Street, Matt Peters APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL;
GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-46
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0118, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO
INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF
ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN
(NODE TM -26) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF LA SERENA WAY, APPROXIMATELY 90' EAST OF CALLE
PINA COLADA.
10 Planning Application No. PA11 -0119, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless
distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -28) in the City of Temecula
right -of -way on the north side of Leena Way directly across Lucca Way, Matt Peters
CONTINUED OFF - CALENDAR; APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL;
GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
11 Planning Application No. PA11 -0121, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless
distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -32) in the City of Temecula
right -of -way on the south side of Nicolas Road, approximately 620' east of Winchester
Road, Matt Peters APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY,
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL;
GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0121, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO
INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF
ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN
5
(NODE TM -32) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF NICOLAS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 620' EAST OF
WINCHESTER ROAD.
12 Planning Application No. PA11 -0124, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless
distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -37) in the City of Temecula
right -of -way on the south side of Winchester Road approximately 185' west of the
centerline of Ynez Road, Matt Peters APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE
REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO, HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-48
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0124, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL
A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS
WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE
TM -37) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF WINCHESTER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 185' WEST OF THE
CENTERLINE OF YNEZ ROAD
13 Planning Application No. PA11 -0125, a Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown
Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless
distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -38) in the City of Temecula
right -of -way on the south side of Zevo Drive, approximately 125' west of Diaz Road,
Matt Peters APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND
BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; GUERRIERO,
HARTER ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-49
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0125, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEWPATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL
A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS
WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE
TM -38) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF ZEVO DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 125' WEST OF DIAZ ROAD
Dave Murphy, Temecula resident, addressed the Planning Commission
6
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
Pat Kight
Chairman
7
Patrick Richardson
Director of Planning and Redevelopment
DATE OF MEETING:
PREPARED BY:
PROJECT
SUMMARY:
RECOMMENDATION:
CEQA:
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant:
General Plan
Designation:
Zoning Designation:
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Lot Area:
Site:
North:
South:
East:
West:
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 3, 2011
Cheryl Kitzerow, Case Planner
Planning Application No. PA11 -0127, a multi - family residential
Development Plan for Portola Terrace to construct a three -story
apartment complex consisting of 44 affordable units, one manager's
unit, and a two -story parking structure on 1.53 acres. Associated
case includes PA11 -0129, a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness
to remove the Arviso House, located at 28681 Pujol Street, from the
Historic Structures Map. Entire project site is addressed as 28673,
28681 and 28701 Pujol Street.
Approve with Conditions
Notice of Determination
Section 15162
Specific Plan Implementation (SP -I)
Neighborhood Residential (NR) per Old Town Specific Plan
Single- family homes and associated "out" buildings
Existing single - family homes (NR)
Existing single - family homes (NR)
Existing Rancho West apartments (NR)
Vacant (SP -8, Westside)
Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required
1.53 acres N/A Existing Lots
Parking Required /Provided: 95 spaces 100 spaces required
Building Height: 48' 50' max with allowable increases
1
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On April 20, 2011, Mr. Jay Ross submitted Planning Application No. PA11 -0127, a multi - family
residential Development Plan for Portola Terrace to construct a three -story apartment complex
consisting of 44 affordable units, one manager's unit, and a two -story parking structure on 1.53
acres. Associated case includes PA11 -0129, a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness to
remove the Arviso House, located at 28681 Pujol Street, from the Historic Structures Map.
On July 11, 2011, the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the project and recommended
approval of the project as well as the Certificate of Historical Appropriateness. The Board
members believe the project as designed would be an enhancement to the area. They
discussed the project site /proposed development in relation to the future Western Bypass and
how the site may be visible from the roadway. The board voted unanimously to recommend
approval.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with all of the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The Neighborhood Residential land use district is intended to provide for attached and detached
three -story residential development at a density of 20 to 35 dwelling units per acre. Typical
housing types include detached single family, multi - family, duplexes, triplexes, condominiums,
and apartments. The proposed project involves the construction of a 3 -story apartment complex
with 45 units on 1.53 acres for a project density of 29 units per acre. A two -story gated parking
structure is proposed at the rear of the site. Access to the project site is proposed via two drive
aisles off Pujol Street. The northerly driveway provides access along the northern property line
to the surface parking at the rear of the site. The southerly driveway provides access along the
southern property line to the below grade parking at the rear of the site. There is no internal
vehicular connection between the drive aisles or within the parking garage. The units that front
Pujol Street will have direct, front -door access from the street. All other units will be accessed
internally, yet there are breezeways proposed to provide additional pedestrian connections from
Pujol Street to the project site. The building is designed as a courtyard with the recreational
amenities in the center. These amenities include a one -story community room, lap pool with
shaded areas and BBQ's, tot lot and sitting area.
The Specific Plan establishes a build -to -line for all new buildings. Within the NR land use
district the building frontage is required to be placed ten feet behind the primary street property
line (75% of the building), five feet from side property lines, and ten feet from the rear property
line, with surface parking areas to be located an additional three feet from the build -to -line to
accommodate landscaping. The proposed apartment building meets this requirement, however
the proposed parking structure at the rear of the project site is proposed with a four -foot setback
from the property line. No landscaping is proposed within this setback area due to the practical
difficulties associated with irrigation and maintenance adjacent to the subsurface parking
structure and limited access behind the structure. The Specific Plan does not include
regulations for affordable housing projects and, where silent, allows the requirements of the
Development Code to prevail. Per Development Code Section 17.10.020.(M)(3)(b), affordable
housing projects are entitled to receive incentives in the form of development code concessions,
one of which allows for modifications to the setback provisions. Staff has reviewed this setback
2
modification and has determined that it is appropriate based on the following: parking is
required for the residential units, there is limited visibility to the rear of the property and the
project site /parking will be located approximately 20 feet lower than the adjacent property to the
west.
In addition to build -to -line requirements, the Specific Plan establishes allowable building and
frontage types appropriate for a vibrant public realm. The NR land use district allows the
following building types: Rowhouse, Courtyard building, Bungalow Courtyard,
duplexltriplex /quadplex, and detached house; the following frontage types are permitted in the
NR: Porch, Arcade, Gallery, Two -story Gallery, Forecourt and Stoop. The proposed project
incorporates a combination of the Courtyard and Quadplex building type and a Stoop frontage
type along Pujol Street. The building meets all design requirements and standards, including
building height, design criteria, landscaping, and massing for each of these styles.
The application is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and has proposed an effective
design to create a vibrant streetscape.
Architecture
The architectural design of the building is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. The three
story residential building incorporates a Spanish - Andalusian style characterized by the building
broken into several smaller masses with a variety of roof types and openings, exposed rafter
tails, arched openings, decorative metal finials, decorative pipe vents, and window shutters and
awnings. Primary material is stucco for both the residential building and parking structure.
Color has also been used to visually vary the building's mass and detail.
Residential Component
The project includes 45 residential apartment units comprised of 44 affordable units restricted at
the low income category and one market rate manager's unit. There are two unit types
proposed including two - bedroom/two bath and three - bedroom/two bath ranging in size from 860
to 1,100 square feet.
The construction of these 44 affordable income units will help to meet the requirements of the
City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The current RHNA cycle requires the City
to provide an opportunity for the construction of 1,381 affordable units by 2014. Projects such
as the Portola Terrace Apartments incrementally contribute to the City's inventory of affordable
housing stock and demonstrate the City's commitment toward meeting requirements
established under State Housing Law.
The Old Town Specific Plan requires parking in conformance with the provisions of the
Development Code, which requires 100 parking spaces, with 59 of the spaces being covered.
As discussed in the Site Plan section of this staff report, the Specific Plan does not include
regulations for affordable housing projects and, where silent, allows the requirements of the
Development Code to prevail. Per Development Code Section 17.10.020.(M)(3)(b), affordable
housing projects are entitled to receive incentives in the form of development code concessions,
one of which allows for modifications to the parking provisions. The project proposes to provide
95 parking spaces with 44 covered, which represents in excess of a 2:1 ratio of spaces per unit
which is acceptable.
3
Landscaping /Open Space
The Specific Plan requires a minimum of 100 square feet of private open space dedicated to
each residential unit. This may be reduced up to 50% as long as the total open space required
is provided. The project requires 4,500 square feet of private open space. A minimum 50
square feet of private open space per unit is required with the remaining 50 square feet
provided in common areas. All units are provided a minimum 80- square foot patio /balcony.
The common open space areas total 9,000 square feet and include the Community Room, pool,
tot lot, sitting area, BBQ and garden which contribute to meet the requirements of the Specific
Plan.
The project proposes to install landscaping within the public right of way along Pujol Street, as
well as small planter areas within the project site. Consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan
(OTSP), 24 -inch box London Plane trees are proposed along Pujol Street, 30 feet on center and
outside the sight lines of the driveways. Fifteen gallon Brisbane Box trees are proposed along
the side property lines /driveways to act as a screen for adjacent properties. Approximately 30
percent of the site is landscaped to meet the requirements of the OTSP.
Certificate of Appropriateness
The proposed project will result in the demolition of the existing buildings on -site. One of these
buildings is the Arviso House located at 28673 Pujol Street, listed on the City's Historic
Structures Map. There is also one additional single family residence /building that is over 45
years of age (constructed circa 1957) located on the project site. Architectural and historical
evaluations of both the Arviso House and the other structure over 45 years of age, conducted by
Eilar Associates, Inc. concluded that neither appear significant within the meaning of CEQA nor
are they eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources.
The OTSP requires that the Planning Commission approve a Certificate of Historic
Appropriateness for the addition or removal of structures on the Historic Structures Map. The
applicant has submitted a request to remove the Arviso House from the City's Historic
Structures Map. Eilar Associates, Inc., has provided a letter summarizing the historical status of
the Arviso House concluding that from a historical standpoint, the building has lost its integrity of
location and setting when it was moved from its original location in 2007 and the simple
architecture of the house was destroyed by the addition of the mercantile facade and the
modern plank siding. In addition, staff has received a letter from the Temecula Valley Historical
Society indicating that they don't have an interest in the structure and they authorize removing it
from the list of historic buildings in Temecula. Both letters are included as attachments to this
report.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on July 21, 2011 and mailed to the
property owners within the required 600 -foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Old
Town Specific Plan Amendment EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA
Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
4
The project site is located within a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Area (MSHCP)
Criteria Cell; however, no conservation is proposed or required. A Joint Project Review was
conducted and on May 23, 2011, and the RCA determined that the project is consistent with the
MSHCP.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F):
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Specific
Plan implementation (SP -l) and the Neighborhood Residential (NR) designation in the Old Town
Specific Plan. The Neighborhood Residential (NR) zoning district is intended to provide for
attached and detached three -story residential development at a density of 20 to 35 dwelling
units per acre. Typical housing types include detached single family, multi - family, duplexes,
triplexes, condominiums, and apartments. The proposed project involves the construction of a
3 -story apartment complex with 45 units on 1,53 acres for a project density of 29 units per acre.
In addition, the project is consistent with the General Plan Housing Element and incrementally
contributes to the City's inventory of affordable housing stock and demonstrates the City's
commitment toward meeting requirements established under State Housing Law.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety
and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health,
safety and welfare.
Certificate of Appropriateness
The structure is 'NOT' associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the
broad patterns of Temecula's historic and cultural heritage.
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola Terrace Apartment
Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June 21, 2011, the project site is the
location of a celebrated crime that took place in the 1930's in which a local blacksmith by the
name of John D. McNeill murdered his wife Melva Martin McNeill. However this is not a
significant historical event to Temecula.
The structure is 'NOT' associated with the lives of persons important in Temecula's past.
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola Terrace Apartment
Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June 21, 2011, the structure was
constructed in 1910 and was the home of Mr. and Mrs. Ventura Arviso. Mr. Arviso worked on
the Vail Ranch but there were no significant historical connections found with Mr. Arviso or his
wife. The current owners, Otto and Nancy Baron, purchased the building in 1997. The
structure is not associated with the lives of persons important to Temecula's past.
5
The structure does 'NOT' embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or
method of construction, and does 'NOT' represent the work of an important individual, or
possess high artistic value.
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1,53 acre Portola Terrace Apartment
Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June 21, 2011, the Arvlso House
comprises a single story, wood framed building that is L- shaped in plan. The building was
originally located that the northwest corner of Mercedes Street and Fourth Street in Temecula.
The dilapidated structure was purchased by the current owners, Otto and Nancy Baron, in 1997
and was used as an antique and collectibles store. The structure was significantly altered by
grafting the false front of an old Los Angeles retail building to the front of the house, removing
the original clapboard siding and replacing it with salvaged shiplap siding from the same
building as the added facade. The building was moved to the Pujol Street site in 2007. The
structure does not represent a distinctive type, period, region or method of construction; nor
does it represent the work of an important individual or possess high artistic value.
The structure does 'NOT' yield or be likely to yield information in prehistory or history of
Temecula.
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola Terrace Apartment
Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June 21, 2011, there are no prehistoric or
historic archaeological sites recorded within the project boundary.
ATTACHMENTS
Aerial Map
Plan Reductions
Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Eilar & Associates Letter
Temecula Valley Historical Society Letter
Notice of Public Hearing
6
City of Temecula
0 250
500
Feet
Aerial - March 2010
PA11 -0127
This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System.
The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessors
Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside
County The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the
Information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map
are subject to update and modification The Geographic Information System and
other sources should be queried for the most current information
This map is not for reprint or resale
111111 1111 1111111111STNOMUL11 AML11111111111111111111
EXIR -FY
RESIDENT PARIR40
11�1111�1111�1�1 ,J 1 11J111.111111111111111
EXISTING
MUI.INE/416-1
R66TDEN1
issaTet
(PLAN SUMMARY
A 2 BR . 2 BATH 30 (57913
8 3 88 . 2 BATH 16 (331)
TOTAL
IPAI11Qi68t.+IA1MT.
MOUSED PARKING SPACES (PER RAC TABLE 17,24.040):
30 unit 6 16 covered spaces/ unl • 301lpacas
161ssas 8. 2,0 covered speceo !IO0 - 30 spaces
30 uses 48 1.0 uncov rea 9pe0e9 he s c 30 6(340 r
150.8. Fr 05 uncover*/ swag /vet - 76 spaces
I sued apace EN 6 uMA• 16 tad /6 • 25 Waco,
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PAfNN10880011ED 100 spaces )85000
PROVIDED PARKING SPACES:
pr0N9ler1 Osacup (rolt19M011:
09080,31 pagnp spaces = 68 spaces
NC parkins spaces - 3 spews
provl040 p6k1n9 39090 ):
0. 410 909ae9 . 2 spaC08
mY /baloq 8psm • 1 space
FDIM4A0Kisco • 1 woes
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PARKING 06CYIOEO 90 •0800• Prpge0
NOTE PROJECT REOUESTS DEVELOPMENT CONCESSION PER
CODE SECTION 17.10:020M3b FOR REDUCTIONOF
08008610 PARKING SPACES
OPEN SPACE SUAMAMY
REQUIRED PRIVATE OPEN SPACES (PER 6P-05 N0.4.at0
10053 per tali •
PLAN OESC ALA
45
PROVIDED PRIVATE OPEN SPACES
8608F
1.100 SF
25.800 SF
16.600 SF
42.300 SF
100, x 46 um - 4.50061
80 61 per 080. 8041046 Levi 8061049111(l,.3,80083
PROVIDED 00/AMON OPEN SPACES
pool /lot IC1/Rains Wee /880/OW69n- 7.160
Conn unity roan • 1,6600
TOTAL PROVIDED COMMON OPEN SPACES • 0.000,
AERIAL AIAP
MRTOLA ERRACE
28873 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMECULA, CA
—01—
PROJECT iNFORMATION
ASSESSOR PARCEL 8:
BLOCK:
PROJECT ADDRESS.
LEGAL DESORPTION:
201440:
LAND USE
TOTAL CROSS SITE AREA: 66.760 SF
'TOTAL NET SITE AREA: 66.780 SF
•1NET OF ALL DEDICATIONS/
RESIDENTIAL
COMMUNITY POOLS
CIRCUATIOI4
mem. /0714ER
PARKING GARAGE 16.166 SF
PRIVATE DECK / PATIO 3,800 SF
GROSS OOLONG AREA 78.182 SF
"NET BUILDING AREA 76.055 SF
•• 6NCLUDE.B ONLY CON0110NE0 AIRSPACE WITHIN WALLS)
BUILDING LOT COVERAGE:
PESDENTNL AREA
PARKING / CAVE AREA
LANDSCAPE AREA
"•FAR.: 78.162K/86,780d- 3.07 FAR
"',TOTAL 5F -AGE FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION,
OCCUPANCY:
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION.
FINE 8PRINIO.ERED
16 /63E60F STORES:
SOLOING MGNT
LOT AREA
TOTAL UNTS:
DENSITY PROVIDED:
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE
FRONTAGE TYPE
BUILDING TYPE:
MINIMUM SETBACKS.
FRONT YARD SETBACK:
SIDE YARD SETOAOC:
REAR YARD SETBACK:
922-002.080. 522.062.004 6822-082.006
84.K 35 LOT 12.3.4.5 6 6
28673 .28701 P.m 85961
1.mectY, CA 92680
OLD TOWN SPECEIC PLAN - SP-5
NEX311806.H000 RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT
MULTIPLE -FAMLY RESIDENTIAL
42,3605F
1.850 SF
12.027 SF
2,250 8F
21.900 SF 132 08)
23.600 SF (36.2111
21,380 SF 432 0904
R.26 A.3
TYPE.VA
YES
10-0'
6.0'
1(7-0'
1 53 316881
1.93 acres
2 AND
1500 MAO )
-PER taw N- 2380enac Ran
1.63 ACRES )860.700 SF)
451INITS
29 DV /ACHES
•BPANISN / MEDITERRANEAN'
'STOOP
'COWITYARO'
APPUC*N1 /DEVELOPER AMCAL MULTI-MUSING, WC
30141 A00ura Rea! SUN 100.
AGOURA HILLS. CA 91301
(518) 7060604
PROJECT INFORMATION
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING, INC.
WIth0B Malcolm A1TNitOC18, LLP
0,.1E J41623. 200 .1008.0 80333 300
PUJOL STREET
ANGLE
FAWN'
31E v N
I�!III �, C.
1140111 su 571 -..6
11► ► 1�`i4 -17r. _ - ^ • ����
,::;:,:zi
AA La
AA FA_
Todi
•
3111
C*9: NG
OPEN
SPACE
4RTOLA XRRACE
2 6 6 7 3 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMECULA. CA
-02-
Rs tNprnsn Amen Dpran
AOA an of ►rw Do0m
0
GROUND LEVEL SITE PLAN
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING, INC.
WItne° MNOdm ArcNtects. LLP
GATE an N :0. J00 NO COON 300
4-
9ORTOLA ERRACE
2 - 28701 PU JOt. STREET
T E M E C U L A, CA
-03-
Ow aft lump oldm
0
0
SECOND LEVEL SITE PLAN
0
AMCAL MULTI - IIOU 8/N6, INC.
.. Wehrle MaIcdm Arclilecm, LLP
w.1F .M. 2011 400 no &IOU=
�'l ORTOLA ERRACE
2 8 6 7 3 - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L STREET
T E M E C U L A, CA
-04-
GROUND LEVEL BUILDING PLAN
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
, - Withee Malcolm AtcNtecls, LLP
DAY! . S0 23 2911 100 1.0 00333 ]W
ORTOLA XRRACE
2 8 8 7 3 - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L STREET
T E M E C U L A . C A
-05-
TYPICAL LEVEL BUILDING PLAN
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING, INC.
Milan Matodrn An:Ntxct8. LLP
O Te x+» eo„ 1001,0 00033 oO
1
.M .....■
,
WNW
Pr °
mmm
QA ROOM
Pla OW
Bora
M;—
s - srsl r ��♦
1 1 /
111 -M4 -1 111
i T
It or
NI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
BC d Oi PNMNO
MwI.OG
ORTOLA XRRACE
28873 - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L STREET
TEMECULA. CA
-06-
ROOF FLOOR PLAN
rQT'A;S r ,'I
'CRY RICA
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC-
F%YmL•MX*6o
kleCaVINCAL EQUIP
Wallop Mn, etcd Architects. U_P
MIS ... 21 7DR .CB.0 11.13 LB
B- NORTH ELEVATION (PUJOL STREET)
ORTOLA XRRACE
28673 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMLOUL A. CA
-0 7 -
COLOR LEGEND
0
0 etre
0 lvt•
to4
f.".Z:Z=:'"
=
fl'
A- A- NORTH ELEVATION (PUJOL STREET)
NORTH (PUJOL ST.) ELEVATION
AMCAL MUL11 - HOUSING.
Withee MeIcolrn Archinocie, LIP
OM Ma U.100 CO s) demos
KEY rWd
ECM& 1,30
O
8- NORTH ELEVATION (PUJOL STREET)
4RTOLA W
28873 - 2 8 7 0 1 PUJOL S T R E E T
TEMECULA. CA
-07-
COLOR LEGEND
Aan•r��a��Y
A- NORTH ELEVATION (PUJOL STREET)
NORTH (PUJOL ST.) ELEVATION
AMCA!. MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
Witliee Malcolm ArcNNola. LLP
DATE.wwxi 1011 FANo 0: V Vn
COLOR LEGEND
11 m,1111111 .‘
11
Eill11111
KEY PLAN
54■11
. •
I
III II HIM
• RI••
PUJOL ST.
cI
—08—
maitzumnuog- ''''
111 11 *
t (6 4)R TOLA t g . E " ItRACE
28673 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMECULA, CA
B- WEST ELEVATION
;
PUJOL ST.
A- WEST ELEVATION (MAIN ENTRY)
------------ - • - • - - '
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
.1,...,0!
AMCAL MULI1 - HOUSING. INC.
Mhos Malcolm Architects, LLP
CW• .700 i PI I .100 hC ••=1,1
COLOR LEGEND
°®
0
N Y PLAN
eou
PUJOL ST
1
�) ORTOLA XRRACE
28 f,73 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMECULA, CA
-08-
B- WEST ELEVATION
PUJOL ST.
A- WEST ELEVATION (MAIN ENTRY)
BUILDING ELEVAT
AMCAL MULTI - HOL SW3. INC.
Wehee Metcolrn AroNtecte, LLP
WK Jas 77 2011 JCONO C>)il 7170
KEY PLAN
0
1
-09-
8- SOUTH ELEVATION
OR TOLA ijERRACE
28673 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
1 EMECULA, CA
COLOR LEGEND
rt
4
SOUTH ELEVA f ION
AMOAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
A SOUTH ELEVATION
,
W. Malcolm AtChlI0001, LLP
041r NA 92 IP I 1 AO MO ODOM 300
2
KEY PLAN
SCYJI 1#44o
-09-
8- SOUTH ELEVATION
:}
OR TOLA RRACE
2 867 3 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
TEMECULA. CA
COLOR LEGEND
A- SOUTH ELEVATION
SOUTH ELEVATION
• 4VV■Ol
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
Wehrle Malcolm Architects. LLP
OATC -as T1 £0 li N� SCSI
I
'"
'
Imsr...
w. .
r - 11■110
w. w+
et..—
,
m i
[
+n
- T 3a'rn '.��i?3
a"_I i
, ..
: ? ° '� :^_E34aL
n 8"AL '01
a
w w , 127 " M.O.
9� ^- L ° 79"��p�'39���7 . � � E &gyp ;emu Np
1801.°6 �. in 6 uiNwl" a ill' ::a :r�.r '••
KEY P.m
& L2 ,•.WO
2 8 8 7 3 - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L S r H E E T
T E M E C U L A , C A
- 10 -
11 II u , il- w , ►w-� , u- r u 11 n -iu nr-�L 1 ' - II
1 ¢ �u 1f 1 1 1I: u 1 � 11.1`rl{tlt {mjI 1111 {{uiu{{ " u � T1=1 =ll -
11 Li
8- BUILDING SECTION
VORTOLA W
to
the
1 ... 1� t.tl
1 {I`nII {I`I1i �1_ I r'k�l-�`l{anthi1��il` t1 ��11uIP ��8hI °iT' ;1" it" n - 1 -. 0.t.'“:1: -1
II 1 - u n u -u a -u -uFt -( 1= - - - 1 -m- - -11 - u { -�1 -.11. - iii- i�� fjl-
= mr : m - - m - m Tm� mmm. m, . �
A- BUILDING SECTION
BUILDING SECTION
AMCA1. MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
WHEN, McIo Im ArdJCecte. LLP
wrt..1..
11 Y aoi . -MAO PIO11Pw
KEY RAN
B- BUILDING SECTION
4RTOLA ERRACE
26873 - 28701 PUJOL STREET
T E M E C U L A , C A
A- BUILDING SECTION
BUILDING SECTION
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC.
WW+e6 Malcolm Architects. LLP
CAR an fl 011
xuuo m 11.w0
1
u It I ' m _ _ • . .• it
II 1i 1- ii -uRU a uPUF1i II II It
II ii 11 II —dl II ID :II II 1�1= ,111✓11 U. .IT ti
11 Ilr II ^Iln ,,,-„ 11 'J II I ^II tS Hn 1 ll. Ilnllnll �� •� t
11 L� Ili II' II I[ II 'II ILA III 11 i ti it li; : u 7,
l di u u it ° liars @ � ° - i ° n��li il nlliq �, i . = u u a -1ik;n u -1 � il'Iua�} n
�, TI I -(I1 -1 _ I
IJ
Inn
1111 =,1 1
11,•=11=111E ' T `
1011011 -11 =t •7 11 If 11 11 ^Ilnllnllnll 11 11 11 11'�II^ t 1 1:' vP+ll nIi ^ll 11 �1�� y�. .1.'
_ _ _ for tl'- pall n= ,u,= irdl�� �r ir4-fAroir n =ir =i��l gigwi,rxT ns,IT �l 11 -... , ,
: II lull -i libli �it l a-1 �1, 11 -Ih��' �� II 'I�h iLh�I IIAII I pull. ICgI� 4"t = "17 ICI- FIJI9 1"'=4="EkIJ1: =:II -R' 11AVV 1 11 II
9C)RTOLA � ERRACE
2 8 0 7 3 - 2 8 7 0 1 PUJOL S T R E E T
T E M E C U L A , C A
-12-
BUILDING SECTIONS
AMCAL MULTI - r1OUSINO. INC.
v. Wltnne Malcolm ANClhtecte. LLP
cats ,,..» .oi. .ce.0 ems 30
PUJOL ST.
PUJOL ST.
UNIT B
-13-
ORTOLA ERRACE
UNIT A
TYPICAL UNIT FLOOR PLANS
288 %:i - 2 8701 PUJOL STHEE
T EMECULA. CA AMOALMUN.TI• HOUSING. INC.
WNgo Malcolm NatYtocts, lLP
4-
tea I ate.,
WORTOLA WakACE
z b 7 3 - 2ti 707 PUJOL STREET
rEmECULA. CA
• 1 1 -
A
COMMUNITY ROOM
COMMUNITY ROOM PLAN
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSINa. INC.
Woo PA �kOMIC,L UP
••• tail Afl.O 6Q»
t
� 1
i
ORTOLA ` ERRACE
2 8 6 7 ) - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L S 1 R L G 1
T E M E C U L A , C A
-I5-
3 -D RENDERING
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING. INC
WON.) Malcolm ArGUleels. LLP
•wr.n - rein ,,mw euwI>.»
t
PORTOLA XRRACE
28673 - 2 8 7 0 1 P U J O L STREET
T E M E C U L A C A
East view
West View
3-0 MASSING
AMCAL MUL 11 - HOUSING, INC
.. Mao Malcoen Nc deC15 LLP
MP,.ue 2.1 M. s,ew eoousaa
North View
7RTOLA W'RRACE
28673 - 26701 PUJOL. STREET
I E M F C U 1. A , C A
South View
3 -D MASSING
AMCAL MULfl - HOUSING, INC.
run, aaa
WANG Malcolm ArcNlocle. LLP
JO. roavaoo
GE•FAAt NOTES
04 .4.33,41•41. VII 10 • 3.440.0
•
. 61 :13.141.
' tlat tzT,t17.1..": '1=1,1E1:1114:4::..""" •
004 OF 01041i62
aglira6StalL
Via
MOSEAl2
••••••••.,
11•:"ZtrO •fla••••• At.
atoms r.itatta
Unita
amp sovr.sc "
WOE
%OKA giLIXIDA
Ste T ZZVAVY1
r.1414. TWAT%
I GenetIAL 81110.440 sr Ansiscs ;
onoJecr MAW*?
InKt V." •
•444.4.• ••••
pr. • •411. • h.
.44■••••
■••••• ■•••••• •••• 44.4
100•4 44. I as
1 434f 1.
0.3•414 u OM V
gattl&aL
L.. .1.,
SUE 574(531,00
.11.104 •••••■•
. 040 •••••••••• .34444
JJ.J •■!.4
nO.Cipt ••••■ 140.0 •••••.3 .3•14.44.4
• DESIAPPON
Z:Vi=era=1:ligei
%NE •:17.".41."1: "
1"1:47."1"
evol.atacwo r 44•• .4.44, 4.4.3 3 44.
Ati•nel • 4.7•10.X. 0144.4
0•11.4313 7.0 14* -.44.0.1•417.....100
4.444.0. 0.4.4•••••11.040
•••••••• 0.444.03
403. •••■• u, .• 4•0•0 00 • 004 4.4
"" .3
.01,4 +CO sow.:
341. • WM
OW. 3.4 0 N. V Cli•
143/ ••••
EMMA
•■•••.•
1.1:::404.111 1. NV.,
4.5 3 WOrsars4:1;1 4•4444
• .33 . 04414 • 40 44.4144
• .14 V.. .11.• 13.4041.• • P.m
4.33,....• • 4.4•3
4.144. • .43[3.4 /elm
03.4.1./ Valera 0,0 •• vi • 0 •••••• . se •(14.11
.3.04 3.• 414.4{ 04444 • • Ir..
/OIL 044.3 .3 1••••••■ • • 34,01
MM./. .4.4 Y. 0,4 • •• • 44
4.4344
.44.4 44-4•414. 4. 0 . 44
▪ •• SO 3
••• • • •••••• GI • • 00.
1.41•44... 0..04
SEreAct< .EOVINEMENT
SITE/CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
PORTOLA TERRACE APARTMENTS
IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
,
94J,I,SJJ
14
MAI •I4 4 Vtir
Lel •
feo42 cot 66.
ES.M.
■41
4,14 art
WI I
..••••••••
I • !st • 0 1,
u •
AIM. I
I cut:,
05.
?:!
N if?
'SIPE,'
S43re
:AM; AiZZ atetire:%P.r ""
0 . 3433,3r34 , 341 , =1 WV•44 4.1■21.• IV • .9
.•■••••■•• nue W., 000 ay. n v.v. IS. 143 ••• It 3
O VW • •••
1419 ow, •edo...
Ci) orn•v r• cove
tI) 40•••••• -.am eV • V 0 4 4.1 0
41D . V .0..4. •■•••••••• 044 .440 0.4.4 I
0 ....JP., ••■•• ••
• NM17.0 • a... 404.••••••■••••
••••10, • v.@ 40•44 raV•Fr.
0 v...., ...ow.
vloYvn• •••4410■•• •••••••
0.144.404•.•.
4.3.4.••••••• •••.,
0 vv., .• • • Nt
wie. ■■• sh.• N.
utuu
•
or.ato afters.. Am.... i.e..
01evteannvor4*ra
•vol. • •••• ADIC • 1140. NA CP 4111.11.141.
1.0 N.••• •••• ••■■• c•••
...I. sm.
mg 9 144 a• •■••
sit
1E6(90
MINI7Y
11129 413 4344/
440,1 ••••%
• =T.:V....1.77:V
• •4314040.430*
•ol• ova
4 V .44 .43.
MN: 311 ;44
•
410.4. • 444..
4.41.144.04
0.4.••••• •••••
4.
4,4913 .4.4..4
-.••• •••• 043. net .4.3
n 3.
3.•••••
•
47.4 44,
.44
▪ • .4.0 II•114 ..... •■••
• •••••1
PORTOLA TERRACE APARTMENTS
CIT1' OF TEMECULA
SITE/CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
0073443701 ?VIOL SINUT
NW/WOE aJLINTY
larm4=4.■••••■•••• !OAT(' at 014 !NORMA
••••••• 40n4019.9-
••■•■••••••■=4.. 1.17FIC COW WY,
044 4. ■••••••
•••••••••• .00.401344••• 411) SHIM I OW
1
fl
OMER: MORA
PARCEL No. 922061002-1 I
SP..03 (1.R.)
SSIEXE EALKY ITESIOENIIAL
0
F
I A ' I f '
.1
0
Pod Mob" 0,0rs
.0
=nag.
„9 • • •
;K.
9 .40•4 *um uo 0
,.?) ft what* 000 o■ .0.0.1000
00 10. 401 l'oom .PO. 0 0,004 •
gi 1000 a' go*/ oplon• .080.0 0.4100.111 01 NO Oat
01.0.0 P•
0•000...1000/ 000100060
•••••• • OM 0001••••••••
t) woe*
1) eaves
a 0 1
._ •
•
Z`)
N451025"W
8]
-
....,:. al.'s.
..,.....,„. lam ; .-0 Oft Oki
.. 1_,.
1
- ,;318,00 4@ilit
la
A ••••
OMER. ..600t r FIRESTONE
PARCEL 00 940$20002-2
INDUSTRUL PAM
VACANT
• .
0
104 AR
R PARKING LEVEL
PUJOL STREET
•
318. 00'
•
!!•
•
• 0 •• •
- --;
0
/ -.11610o
0
K
..••••-
ORICCI: &MAGGIO
PARR, tlo
0720621, +
SP-05 (0 61
SO/GLE F01•0+ NESIOth6o,
PORTOLA TERRACE APARTMENTS
CiTl'OF TEMECULA
SITE/CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
i SHIIITIOIMITHEIMI
foof/Jo-WVIIVIX4 STRIXTrIeWCZJIA
,
wow.. SIAlEOPCALWONNIA
RIVIA■711li MINI"'
. INKII,CCOA10.0V,INC.
r " ••••••
.-••• '' ' • . •
i - MR l�l
9 �
1:11 W I . FM ; .1�LM
.v:H:�,:er xln ..,. • +9w� r •�n • :,s•e ��;ra a • >••.1•
1
ri ea Y1faNfltO. a ir..lY
..mush ncnA.o snln
•
4 a •
U.OL/fIOVCapl 6.SL,
SECTION E -E
1. --1jII
4y i •
SECT ON F.F
1
IOW
Fn 11oN �..(
711
—1—
w.
( — 14J l �
,�cr.o K K
G
am OF WA1 ( ORAL
VV Itt1?
MODIFIED
BACK C!F WAl L DRAW
PORTOLA TERRACE APARTMENTS
(p nr • ..••... urr�....w
0• r. • .r
({...r. r. rrwr
e nr. •■•■• r «..
® .= ..
ae. •eN c
.
1191!12
•
am 0.41,4
ENSSIMNG SMUT sumo
rwcAL 9tWEWAY
CITY OF TEMECULA
BITE /CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN
2071.11101 ItMA SMELL m71M.YVL(, CA
R11•hR5YDN9LWNTY
SEA 9F.' OFC'ALWORN/A
_1(1r* 3 or 3 pact"
IRRIGATION 61.5•614 010460, THE IMt6ATION ST2TE01 0,001078 0P 100%
ORII IRRGATON. ALL IRRIGATION VALV 1* IMAM. D6 06616060 PGA
M1.OROZONG AND *MALI. MEET TM GMT OP 7151E04LA WAT1* 6rPIG16NT
LAM06GME ORO4NANGO 1 7.62.
A 141.01.0600E NM SMALL 6 1180141720 r/ITN 71+E GON9T2I0T107l
0001077ENT5.
ALL *8.4.67144.11+6164.017174450411. Or TIMEGVLA WA71R 6PRGENT
LANP$GAPE ORLMANG6 17.02.
ALL TR660 AND LAR *6 5M5450 SHALL 176 PLACED A WN11.NM Or 0
MATER ./ TER•, 6A*M67ER8 OR 01116121..IN66; A MINWYM OP 1 081014
411.471. POLED: ANP A MINIMA. OF 6 PROM PIR! HYDRANT•
(D E! MT. 0M.IITPAGE 6* 46711 • 00' O.G.
A.O NT. SPLIT /AGM MACK WALL
(*21 O1TA..) .wtf: .. lf ..l /;'. . \I,
••U•UIIU•••i.1..N1 lut a,.V1 � �s.•..0 I.♦u....uuuuu.uui
4 R, ; . ' tl11I1YI06M1 1 a i � r.r a P . . _ .: .. .. . * 0. 1 � A� Oa10 .. w1•, °.
ii -
4• F:.• P m 1illIM■ ■ ■ ■ ■11•11111■ ■V:4U11■■111111110• ■ ■1lF ' • :
1! i'4! - IN
iialit
III
: . � MIIIIIIIIIII■III•r11111■1111111,111111■ ■11114• ■111■11
MI
•■
6' -4. HT.6PU7PAGE PIMA 172• e00.0.
( 0 16 01164.)
6 -0 NT.6/UTPAGE 21.0C42 A L
( PET,%.)
" me mg min Immo mov
mio mi mom ma me mei me lo
_ -u-
moo= must Elli MN II= IN
"MN MIN IMO MIIR11111,11•1113 I
IMI R I mommo me me sont
us ow mg sinumo
lirmseamommis.71
1111
Sill
l' -0• NT. OPIITPA01 BLOC. WALL • 111,0721 (COLON: OM I- 0.1.6.
O0LAR 67EE1. 82601 I PILAOTIR (COLOR TO MATON AR0
PU.IOL 9TRGQT
10TVRAL NAIL 77.54
PORTOLA TERRACE
PLAN VIEri YV /ABOVE GRAPE PARKIN&
4T.TAIL) 7VDVLAR 67211. *1661
(666 DE
s' PLANTER A/ 1 O -O4T
28673 - 28701 PUJOL STAEET
TEMECULA. CA
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN
•10.41GT 8160,62
01G0*ATVI1416 4.AR PAVING
D04L06R6 ASP 60651.6
47000 ARDOR (COLOR TO MATON ARCM
500 77/94,91 A.a5OR - N 7.6.
5TA00.16161468. G014MIRGIAL *1A15E 550
014600 FNMA TO MATCH ARCH.
SPLIT PAGE OLOGK COLOR (OIYr! OR 1044
f•-0 NT. 0►LITPAG6 BLOCK WALL
( 8110114.4.)
011 DI MT. TAIL) OPUTPAGE PLSTIR • 00 O.O.
PLANT PALETTE
157265:
1'01',0(0 IMC
MOW YAW MR
0
Ira
IP•4 100•0•4•0 NOR O•9AN WIN
4118 • AMA 1414 8091 K RY
.10101' -pM 944*
MM. • VP 6•81411
1VSINS mom.
MORO now•
GAY* 611
11141/11 MR
MI MORE 01'
•0110* MORA VT M
/.69616 64R4D8 • I1R0NN1*18
8481& we GOMIM 1Ml
1*6I0414R1M 164*1R o
POW OWN ,1111 IOW LLY
1.0 M11A MM MI
IA04.2 MI IAO9!1
U00I1114• L 6P00•IIIM 444
4114* Hoes 11414
1MY01• 0/4 4* noRO 1
1114 4141,. 004.0 610
6•04004 • T41A16i! 601121•1
•••• A. •OE
040.17.1.86 (TTP.)
PUJOL 9TRCeT
AMCAL MULTI - HOUSING, INC.
30141 AGOURA RD.
AGOURA HILLS, CA 91301
(818) 706 -0694
057.0549 ANP 008511 FOOL A0G655 *4. E
LOWER 1.1V1L *4.11* I6
614700 VI4CVLAR ENTRY PLAN VI.W W /LOYVER LEVEL PARKING
•10 91!0.1' W. i4 1'10. QM.
K IM Y •/I T •
• It
IM
' N.
IK
•614
•K
•.4.
•
t at
IM
OW
00
•
•
IIAIAM POOR+. TWO OW ,a RAE N Oa Y NY •
M RP 414 10rAY011tO
11.0•! M • Ot N M•11 it
Nam Ran
910 ALUM AFT MAGM
•
P4
• IL
• k
Y Y(.
I /G
• 40
• PM
• I4.
• 94
POOL ( 10'* 40')
011267 TREES W /TREE 61,169
• 50'0.0. PER OsTr
NA
NII• Ina
14EANOERIM6 EWALK
LAR6Q A006NT 87M489•0.ER1NN4AL6:
•OOAMI0 IMP. CAMS* NM 1.0
A•NI••• 4•1110
NPR WOO.*
AR .41.6114
A! RRKA
4.00 0004
V ■16:
IOW*. Nat
880 AREA 4l /60,91 TRELLIS
w.Ml• IAI
WOW 144E
NOC Alt
onc Ito
AQ
SMALL PERENNIALS AND 6ROVN000 VER:
IOOAI 0118 G06I•• NM O0
IRO. mamma N.M• 1AIf
010 ••••M• *Ma or*. MIY 11.1'11
0040111114 ORR MAX 114
IDON'4• OOOI P1141 1 k
614 w LINK 6M: l K
8010•'• 14••00 ORO JM•! IOM
GMMM NMa
MOO •0200••• RMIYWI6 q1a Mr
IM00 AL Amens "ILO
..� �w+�. r�•w•w.+.•N =�u `r I `t• •wit � P i � - • �i. �..w r�i,s �� ��i i�+ i.r. �Y. wrn r/.
COLORE0 GONG. PAVING <•nu.<•w A,<X4•<,.
90086 A06N0WN
TOT -LOT M.AY AREA , •,,,,�, ,,,,
DONGN 96AT746 AREA ,v
TAM.. ENGLODVRI /SHOOT
PATIO W TADLE SEATING
IOL
K
�K ao
•
WA*
ESL
11E611111
RAl*6O PLANTER
77/OG125IIN *RLOS
0 44 re f/1440
m
•
•.4
4 PL
• I4
TM
144140M NT TIM I M O
▪ am r9G
•• I••
▪ Of Y IL
▪ 1'0 1 ••
1'O V M
4ed 046&* IR. X 10.14,414
•M. M .• P
PENAL /LAHT OVANT4T116 /C1. r70...10 ORAIa416*
MIS
POI
89* 14.14.20 n
Co1.01.11. lumen/
W0.1
Cd0755.
0818.
Avg
Nut
Me
1070/01n
0w/Nn
NAIR 05111XM1Y
0110a1on0.
ro
1.21
3.1
1.0
1.00
3.10
00761T1 1
110•10.4o
In
0.01
0.1
0.0
O.A.
0.0.
0770111 2
117.010.8
r0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0.
R.A.
MORINO OI'C0
111144n..K.
It
2.10
21.0
1.0
2.11
21.01
011.10010170040
211o1n,nd
re
1.71
1.7
1.1
1.21
1.11
IOC 1211
I11sloMa.
PO
1.10
2.1
1.0
1.10
1.71
500011D00Y 00170/17
1110alnand
ro
1.51
2.2
1.0
1.51
1.20
11AUCKOT
I111a1ono.
Fe
6.07
20.1
1.0
6.07
20.10
Ie..nn 000010
1000,1
R/
IoM
0f1.I■•
puI y
RR
Ia00444a
.
Bas Ma
rm.
ma
0.M
o •4 0a-In-an -6-111-.2l OJap
O I
00000 0.00910 a4911M
19M
MM
0.02
Ma w 00440- ]Fns.a -Ia MINN
)
0
MEMO
Dye
NO
0.000
0 I40000 Aaa.•004.%.0a 0MNN
F l ,
0AIOR
140.0
0040
1.000
AIM 100 000- M1.14.4.0.20 4000
0I
M IMI
,na,
TIN
0410
000, 100. M•M••I•OY-Ia Me.
PROPERTY UNE
11011 TRESPASS
BE70N0 PA
REFLECT 0.0
r001- C46I0LES
NO LICIT
TRESPASS.
1 11
!!
fri
e
SITE AND PARKING DECK
PROPERTY LINE
Scu141 811E Or PROPERTY IS
ADJACENT AN UP- 510PE. TINS
LICIT 1RESPASS IS NO A CONCERN
00CNT TRESPASS
o 1.1 BEYOND PA
REFLECT 00
7001- CWDIES
0.11 0.4 NO 11.112.11
TRESPASS
0.o b.o
O ,0
5,4
0.1
0.0 1.,
1.1. 5.0
5,, 0.
0.0 7
0,0 0,1
o
, n.n
PROPERTY 1104
b.0
10' LED RECREA11011 AREA UCNT
7 4/ ± 4 4§Nn•••
T 1£0 PATHWAY 112111
2`901.011
LED CARPORT LK;N1
•
SUM
.4t , •14 .0
15 DRIVEWAY /PARKING DECK
MALT
ONE 522100. REFERENCED ANOICAICS
A U4117 01101 BACK90E LICIT
044000144 10 PREYENr LIGHT
TRESPASS)
10' 1£0 PARKING DECK 11C141
(THE SYMBOL REFERENCED INDICATES
A 114141 W11H0UT LI048 911ELOS )
► COen
A1O4L MR11- 01000441, .IC
10141 SCUMA 0010.
9I11C 100
OCOIKI• NKLS CA. 91701
• Propel:
PORTOLA
TERRACE
► Location.
10140.ILA, CA
• Description.
CONCEPTUAL
LIGHTING PLANS
'► Revisions
1 1 0 :1 109MTTM 4
81 04 507111
• ('oeel Info.
01..8 er 544
OnMa e• KIRA
1100. 41 *0120
n.o es
.00 5., 2001I/01110
■ SNSst 1100 '
PN0104TRIC
STUDY
• Sheet Reference,
PS -1
laialeAles 1aboNle
11 01
Oty
Label
lreantim *t
total Leap twee.
0L9
OewelpeLon
Yet&
OA11AL
17
OM001 LTORT
611011
6310
0.310
116.100- Y1- 01- DOb313 1525 06)
06
C0l0Olatlon :Trey
Label
Ca l0Twe
MIA.
1q
Nan
AU
M6/110
IY./llle
OA11AL
110. I.,.ew
re
6.36
16.0
1.1
0.03
14.61
8.5 5.9 5.3 1.7 5.3 5.5 2.5 5.4 5.4 2.7 5.6 5.2 3.1 5.7 '4.8 2.1 5.7 '4.5 3.1 5.7 4 2 5 .7 4.8
9 .7 6.2 '5.4 1.8 5.5 5. 2 . 6 5.6 5.6 2.8 5.8 5.4 3. 5. 9 A.9 3.2 6.0 4.6 `3.1 6.0 4.6 2.6 5.9 4.9
9
3.8
.6
9
2
5
14P
.6
16.1
4.7
0
.2
ALL SITE LIGHTS ARE LESS THAN 4050 LUMENS
PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIGHTING ORDINANCE 655
ZONE B, CLASS II, AND ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 6.01.040, "REQUIREMENT FOR LAMP
SOURCE AND SHIELDING"
THE CARPORT AND GARAGE LIGHTS ARE GREATER
THAN 4050 LUMENS, THOUGH THEY ARE UNDER
A NATURAL SHIELD AND THUS DO NOT IMPACT
THE NIGHT SKY AND ARE THUS ACCEPTABLE
PWER THE ORDINANCE
5.4
4.7
a
PARKING GARAGE
4.9
13.2
4.5
0
4.5
2.7
412
4.9
'10.0
4.3
0
4.2
2.e
11139
4.9
8.7
4.1
O
®..A* 0
LEO GARAGE 11GHT
4. 1
2.8
W.0
4.9
8.5
'4.0
3
O
3.S
2.2
3 5.0 4.4
5 1.6`10 10.
1;90
'4.8
4.3
11111•1
0 y 1e 10
xel 1'.10•0'
▪ Oien
HICK 14001-00051•11; r _
30141 ACOURA R0»
70111 100
A000RA 11t1.3. CA n,
• Protect:
PORTOLA
TERRACE
• Locoli0n.
1010:6010. CA
• Desrripllo'
CONCEPTUAL
LIGHTING PLANS
h Revisions:
L_I5 QWTUI 1110/11
2_150 001111002 5/10/1
. Sheet Info'
m.. 0T 1RA
00200.0 O • A
SM. 05 007(0
001. 07 -10 -11
M No. 4100.11/03111
• Sheet !Mel
PHOTOMETRIC
STUDY
■ Sheet Reference:
PS -2
e..., 2 2
1
4
.a
.9
.7
3.8
1.5
.2
.8
4.
4.9
16.1
:.3
O .1
.9
wit
9.9
15.1
2.5
O 1.2
5.0
ilk
4.7
13.2
2.9
0 1.5
5.1
1
'4.4
10.0
2.9
0 4.2
. 1 5. 1
it 9
/2.9
8.
O 4.1
. 5. 7 1
1i40
4 .1
8.5
8.5 5.9 5.3 1.7 5.3 5.5 2.5 5.4 5.4 2.7 5.6 5.2 3.1 5.7 '4.8 2.1 5.7 '4.5 3.1 5.7 4 2 5 .7 4.8
9 .7 6.2 '5.4 1.8 5.5 5. 2 . 6 5.6 5.6 2.8 5.8 5.4 3. 5. 9 A.9 3.2 6.0 4.6 `3.1 6.0 4.6 2.6 5.9 4.9
9
3.8
.6
9
2
5
14P
.6
16.1
4.7
0
.2
ALL SITE LIGHTS ARE LESS THAN 4050 LUMENS
PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIGHTING ORDINANCE 655
ZONE B, CLASS II, AND ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
SECTION 6.01.040, "REQUIREMENT FOR LAMP
SOURCE AND SHIELDING"
THE CARPORT AND GARAGE LIGHTS ARE GREATER
THAN 4050 LUMENS, THOUGH THEY ARE UNDER
A NATURAL SHIELD AND THUS DO NOT IMPACT
THE NIGHT SKY AND ARE THUS ACCEPTABLE
PWER THE ORDINANCE
5.4
4.7
a
PARKING GARAGE
4.9
13.2
4.5
0
4.5
2.7
412
4.9
'10.0
4.3
0
4.2
2.e
11139
4.9
8.7
4.1
O
®..A* 0
LEO GARAGE 11GHT
4. 1
2.8
W.0
4.9
8.5
'4.0
3
O
3.S
2.2
3 5.0 4.4
5 1.6`10 10.
1;90
'4.8
4.3
11111•1
0 y 1e 10
xel 1'.10•0'
▪ Oien
HICK 14001-00051•11; r _
30141 ACOURA R0»
70111 100
A000RA 11t1.3. CA n,
• Protect:
PORTOLA
TERRACE
• Locoli0n.
1010:6010. CA
• Desrripllo'
CONCEPTUAL
LIGHTING PLANS
h Revisions:
L_I5 QWTUI 1110/11
2_150 001111002 5/10/1
. Sheet Info'
m.. 0T 1RA
00200.0 O • A
SM. 05 007(0
001. 07 -10 -11
M No. 4100.11/03111
• Sheet !Mel
PHOTOMETRIC
STUDY
■ Sheet Reference:
PS -2
e..., 2 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0127, A MULTI - FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PORTOLA
TERRACE TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY
APARTMENT COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 44
AFFORDABLE UNITS, ONE MANAGER'S UNIT, AND A
TWO -STORY PARKING STRUCTURE ON 1.53 ACRES.
ASSOCIATED CASE INCLUDES PA11 -0129, A
CERTIFICATE OF HISTORICAL APPROPRIATENESS TO
REMOVE THE ARVISO HOUSE, LOCATED AT 28681
PUJOL STREET, FROM THE HISTORIC STRUCTURES
MAP. THE ENTIRE PROJECT SITE IS ADDRESSED AS
28673, 28681 AND 28701 PUJOL STREET. (APNS 922-
062 -003, -004, -005).
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On May 11, 2010, the City Council approved the Old Town Specific Plan
Amendment and EIR.
B. On April 20, 2011, Jay Ross of AMCAL Multi- Housing, Inc., filed Planning
Application Nos. PA11 -0127, Development Plan Application, and PA11 -0129,
Certificate of Historical Appropriateness, in a manner in accord with the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
C. The Applications were processed including, but not limited to a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
D. On July 11, 2011, the Old Town Local Review Board, at a regular meeting,
considered the applications and recommended the Planning Commission approve the
applications as proposed.
E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Applications and environmental review on August 3, 2011, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
F. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA11 -0127 and
PA11 -0129 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F):
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City;
As conditioned, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies
for Specific Plan Implementation (SP -I) and the Neighborhood Residential (NR)
designation in the Old Town Specific Plan. The Neighborhood Residential (NR)
zoning district is intended to provide for attached and detached three -story
residential development at a density of 20 to 35 dwelling units per acre. Typical
housing types include detached single family, multi - family, duplexes, triplexes,
condominiums, and apartments. The proposed project involves the construction
of a 3 -story apartment complex with 45 units on 1.53 acres for a project density
of 29 units per acre. In addition, the project is consistent with the General Plan
Housing Element and incrementally contributes to the City's inventory of
affordable housing stock and demonstrates the City's commitment toward
meeting requirements established under State Housing Law.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare;
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be
consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare.
Certificate of Historical Appropriateness
A. The structure is `NOT' associated with events that have made a significant
contribution to the broad patterns of Temecula's historic and cultural heritage;
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola
Terrace Apartment Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June
21, 2011, the project site is the location of a celebrated crime that took place in
the 1930's in which a local blacksmith by the name of John D. McNeill murdered
his wife Melva Martin McNeill. However this is not a significant historical event to
Temecula.
B. The structure is `NOT' associated with the lives of persons important in
Temecula's past;
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola
Terrace Apartment Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June
21, 2011, the structure was constructed in 1910 and was the home of Mr. and
Mrs. Ventura Arviso. Mr. Arvlso worked on the Vail Ranch but there were no
significant historical connections found with Mr. Arviso or his wife. The current
owners, Otto and Nancy Baron, purchased the building in 1997. The structure is
not associated with the lives of persons important to Temecula's past.
C. The structure does 'NOT' embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,
period, region, or method of construction, and does 'NOT' represent the work of an
important individual, or possess high artistic value;
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola
Terrace Apartment Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June
21, 2011, the Arvlso House comprises a single story, wood framed building that
is L- shaped in plan. The building was originally located that the northwest corner
of Mercedes Street and Fourth Street in Temecula. The dilapidated structure
was purchased by the current owners, Otto and Nancy Baron, in 1997 and was
used as an antique and collectibles store. The structure was significantly altered
by grafting the false front of an old Los Angeles retail building to the front of the
house, removing the original clapboard siding and replacing it with salvaged
shiplap siding from the same building as the added facade. The building was
moved to the Pujol Street site in 2007. The structure does not represent a
distinctive type, period, region or method of construction; nor does it represent
the work of an important individual or possess high artistic value.
D. The structure does 'NOT' yield or be likely to yield information in prehistory
or history of Temecula;
According to the "Cultural Resources Assessment of the 1.53 acre Portola
Terrace Apartment Project Site" prepared by Eilar Associates, Inc., dated June
21, 2011, there are no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites recorded within
the project boundary.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan and Certificate of Historical Appropriateness Applications:
A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the
previously approved Old Town Specific Plan Amendment EIR and is, therefore, exempt
from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations).
B. The project site is located within a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation
Area (MSHCP) Criteria Cell; however, no conservation is proposed or required. A Joint
Project Review was conducted and on May 23, 2011, the RCA determined that the
project is consistent with the MSHCP.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0127, a multi - family residential Development
Plan for Portola Terrace to construct a three -story apartment complex consisting of 44
affordable units, one manager's unit, and a two -story parking structure on 1.53 acres
and PA11 -0129, a Certificate of Historical Appropriateness to remove the Arviso House,
located at 28681 Pujol Street, from the Historic Structures Map; the entire project site is
addressed as 28673, 28681 and 28701 Pujol Street, subject to the Conditions of
Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this
reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 3 day of August 2011.
ATTEST:
Patrick Richardson, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Pat Kight, Chairman
I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 3 day of August 2011, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Patrick Richardson, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application Nos.: PA11 -0127 and PA11 -0129
Project Description:
Assessor's Parcel No.: 922 - 062 -003, -004, -005
MSHCP Category: Residential — greater than 14.1 DU
DIF Category: Residential — Attached (credit for demolition of 2 SFDU)
TUMF Category: Exempt (low income housing)/ Residential — Mulit- family (manager's
unit)
Approval Date: August 3, 2011
Expiration Date: August 3, 2013
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project
PL -1.
General Requirements
PA11 -0127, a multi - family residential Development Plan for Portola
Terrace to construct a three -story apartment complex consisting of
44 affordable units, one manager's unit, and a two -story parking
structure on 1.53 acres. Associated case includes PA11 -0129, a
Certificate of Historical Appropriateness to remove the Arviso House,
located at 28681 Pujol Street, from the Historic Structures Map. The
entire project site is addressed as 28673, 28681 and 28701 Pujol
Street.
The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/
developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above,
the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the
City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or
proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages
resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the
PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this project.
PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for
good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a
time.
PL -6. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Old
Town Specific Plan.
PL -7. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within the Old Town Specific Plan EIR.
PL -8. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
PL -9. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department.
PL-1 0. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
PL -11.
City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or
legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the
Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to
include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials,
officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall
promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to
which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the
action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the
best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers,
landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the
property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or
repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters.
Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure
all trash bins are covered at all times.
PL -12. The applicant shall paint a three -foot by three -foot section of the building for Planning
Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
PL -13. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10"
glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL -14. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
PL -15. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and
construction debris.
PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
PL -17. All parkways, including within the right -of -way, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational
facilities and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance
association.
PL -18. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing streetlights shall be paid for by
the developer. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain
a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground- disturbing
activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly
discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PL -19. At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall
contact the Pechanga Tribe to notifythe Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring
program, and to coordinate with the City and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources
Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of
known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native
American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities;
project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors;
and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human
remains discovered on the site.
PL -20. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading
report with the City of Temecula (if required) to document the proposed methodologyfor
grading activity observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a
qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and
redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in PL -19, the
archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in
consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any
archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to
monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities in consultation with the project
archaeologist.
PL -21. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5
states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has
made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from
disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If
the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the
Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native
American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely
descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s)
shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations
concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98
and the Treatment Agreement described in PL -19.
PL -22. The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred
items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to
the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
PL -23. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided
and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible.
PL -24. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are
discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall
assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the
mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b)
avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the
Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or
the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning
Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological
resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of
the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the
Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and /or City Council.
PL -25. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations in the Preconstruction
Paleontological Assessment of the 1.53 -acre Portola Terrace Housing Project located
at 28673 -28701 Pujol Street, prepared by John A. Minch, PH.D. and Robert S. White,
dated May 2011.
PL -26. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double
detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
PL -27. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations
not visible from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director.
PL -28. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise
the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of
the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his/her sole discretion
may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably
necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified
specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of
the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource,
the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director."
PL -29. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL -30. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lotto the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
PL -31. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the
plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance
and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The
plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee
Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan.
PL -32. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five -foot wide planter to
be installed at the perimeter of all parking spaces (excluding structure). Curbs,
walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
PL -33. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that "The
contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation
inspection."
PL -34. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per
Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost
estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall
use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water
budget.
PL -35. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape
site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation installation with
open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -
to -head coverage, and to verify that all planting have been installed consistent with the
approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper
landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance bond." The
applicantiowner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections.
PL -36. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the
proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and
landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved
maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who
shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL -37. Specification of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three
landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify irrigation
installation with open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation
systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all planting have been installed
consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will
verify proper landscape maintenance for release of one year landscape maintenance
bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule
inspections.
PL -38. Automatic irrigation shall be installed for all landscaped areas and complete screening
of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent
property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub
planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to
66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD) maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not
be limited to, private slopes and common areas.
PL -39. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six
months of the completion of grading, it shall be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for
dust and soil erosion control.
PL -40. The plans shall include all hardscape within private common areas.
PL -41. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing
the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences:
a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project (sides) and wrought iron for rear.
PL -42. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans
including all structural setback measurements.
PL -43. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the
construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in
any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be
shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning
Director.
PL -44. Solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning
Director approval.
PL -45. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear
zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not
to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
PL -46. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not
limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape to match the style of the
building subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
PL -47. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements
made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and
demolition debris.
PL -48. Prior to the first building permit or installation of additional streetlights, whichever occurs
first, the developer shall complete the Temecula Community Services District
application, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan, and pay the advanced energy
fees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
PL -49. An applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification
by the Planning Director or his /her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance
shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and
irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final
landscape and irrigation plans. If a certificate of use and occupancy is not required for
the project, such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling
for the final inspection.
PL -50. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted
mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right -of -ways. If
upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or
backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right -of -way
adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a
sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by
the Planning Director.
PL -51. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning
Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL -52. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection priorto issuance of
the first occupancy permit.
PL -53. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department
for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the
landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to
the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL -54. Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible
spaces not displaying distinguishing placards or license
plates issued for persons with disabilities may be towed away
at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by
telephoning (951) 696- 3000."
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous
place, at each entrance to the off - street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22
inches, clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
PL -55. In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
three square feet in size.
PL -56. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be
installed.
PL -57. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
PL -58. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, "Smoking in Multi -Unit Residences," the Developer
shall submit a site plan to the City for review and approval, designating a minimum of 25
percent of the units within the project as non - smoking units.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
PL -59. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated April 26, 2011, a copy
of which is attached.
PL -60. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Geologist's transmittal dated, June 9, 2011, a copy of which is attached.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
General Conditions /Information
B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings.
B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
B -3. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on
plans.
B -4. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
B -5. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
B -6. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
B -7. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance
with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and
other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way.
B -8. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
B -9. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
B -10. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and
any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.
B -11.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance
9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted
hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and
Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally
recognized Government Holidays.
B -12. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a
Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This
project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The
fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. (Applicable to
Manager's Unit only /Low Income Units are Exempt)
B -13. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
B -14. Commercial projects shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the
operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each
building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the
plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter
is not specifically proposed.
At Plan Review Submittal
B -15. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review.
B -16. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of
the 2010 edition of the California Plumbing Code.
B -17. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities.
B -18. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the
building and the truss manufacturer engineer.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
B -19. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans.
Prior to Beginning of Construction
B -20. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building inspector priorto the start of the
building construction.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
F -1.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
F -2. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall
provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI
residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City
Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -3. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix C. A combination of on -site and off site 6" x 4" x 2-2 %" outlets on a looped
system shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants
shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more
than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to
a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the
system (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -4. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building
hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from
a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the
exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided
where required by the fire code official (CFC Chapter 5).
F -5. The parking structure will require fire sprinkler protection on the lower level and hose
connections and stand pipes on the upper level.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
F -6. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed
loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all- weather driving
capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness
of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 1410.1, prior to building construction, all
locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC
Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -7. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC
Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -8. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter
5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -9. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed
shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter5 and
City Ordinance 15.16.020).
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
F -10. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems
pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer,
contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant
type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be
required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met
for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building
permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and Chapter 5).
F -11.
Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval.
Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire
Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building
permit.
F -12. Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three
sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention
Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house
panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
F -13. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots)
(City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -14. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or
approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible
from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their
background. Multi- family residential buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers.
All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and /or numbers on both the front
and rear doors. Single family residences and multi - family residential units shall have fl-
inch letters and /or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter
5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -15. A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium,
townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated
diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all
streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the
complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be
approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation.
F -16. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet
in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5).
F -17. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5).
F -18. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan
designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or signs (CFC Chapter 5).
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PD -1.
Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings is kept at a height of no
more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and
shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would -be intruders from breaking into the
buildings utilizing lower level windows.
PD -2. Applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to
prevent roof accessibility by "would -be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural
ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot clearance from the buildings.
PD -3. Any berms shall not exceed three feet in height.
PD -4. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and
in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations.
PD -5. All exterior lighting to be in compliance with Riverside County Mount Palomar Lighting
Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred.
PD -6. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The
doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level,
evenly dispersed.
PD -7. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mount light fixtures to provide
sufficient lighting during hours of darkness.
PD -8. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware
shall be commercial or institution grade.
PD -9. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-
hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP.
PD -10. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well -
lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This
feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings.
PD -11. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section
22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
PD -12. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime
Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective
use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime
and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this
concept are included below:
PW -1.
a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition
may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the
arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying
controlled space.
b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when
they are moving from public to semi - public to private space.
c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where
there is good surveillance and access control.
d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a
location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due
to observation and possible intervention.
e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural
surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the
areas feel safer.
f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may
conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for
example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict.
g.
Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for
normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and
intervention.
h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users
need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and
clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance.
i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through
improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design
efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building.
PD -13. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police
Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5132.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to
any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site
plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement
constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be
resubmitted for further review and revision.
PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way.
PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way.
PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and
existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x
36" City of Temecula mylars.
PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the
design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or
entering any storm drain system or receiving water during all field - related activities.
PW -6. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must be conceptually accepted bythe City
prior to the initial grading plan check. The WQMP will be prepared by a registered civil
engineer and include Low Impact Development (LID) Best Management Practices,
(BMPs), source controls, and treatment devices.
PW -7. All onsite drainage and water quality features shall be privately maintained.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PW -8. The Developer shall provide clearances from utility purveyors for the relocation and /or
vacation of the existing 10 -foot wide easement along the eastern property line.
PW -9. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) must receive final acceptance by the
City prior to issuance of any grading permit.
PW -10.
PW -11.
PW -12.
A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and
private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading
Ordinance Section 18.24.120.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction
of engineered structures and pavement sections.
PW -13. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
PW -14.
PW -15.
PW -16.
PW -17.
PW -20.
PW -21.
PW -22.
PW -23.
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and
liquefaction.
The developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered civil engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the developer.
Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's
Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual,
and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control.
The project shall demonstrate coverage under the State NPDES General Permit for
Construction Activities by providing a copy of the Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be available at the site throughout
the duration of construction activities.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive
written clearances from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board, Army Corps of
Engineers, California Department of Fish and Game, Riverside County Flood Control
and Water Conservation District, Planning Department, or other affected agencies.
PW -18. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
PW -19. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on
adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
This project shall comply with Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A Flood
Plain Development Permit Application shall be submitted to the Department of Public
Works for review and approval.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
Improvement plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be
observed:
PW -25.
PW -26.
PW -27.
PW -28.
PW -30.
a. Driveways shall conform to City of Temecula Standard Number207A (modified), as
shown on the approved Site Plan.
b. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City of Temecula Standard Number. 400.
c. All street and driveway center line intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
d. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut -off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
e. Trench repair /paving improvements shall conform to City of Temecula Standard
Numbers 407 and 407A.
PW -24. All existing and proposed facilities shall be undergrounded per Temecula Municipal
Code Chapter 15.04.080.
The developer shall construct all public improvements outlined in these conditions to
City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be
reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works.
Improve Pujol Street (General Local Street Standard No. 104 -60' RAN) to include
installation of curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities
(including but not limited to water and sewer).
a. The Developer shall install a storm drain system including catch basin(s) on Pujol
Street. Latter shall tie into the existing storm drain system /catch basin on Main
Street. An alignment analysis for the proposed storm drain system shall be
conducted in compliance to City of Temecula Standard No. 609.
i. Runoff that is generated onsite shall be treated, collected and conveyed, via
storm drain pipe to the said storm drain system.
The developer shall construct all public improvements in conformance with applicable
City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works including
street improvements, which may include, but not limited to, pavement, curb and gutter,
sidewalk, drive approaches; streetlights, signing, striping; sewer and domestic water
systems; under grounding of proposed /existing utility distribution lines; and storm drain
facilities.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic
engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and
detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public
Works.
PW -29. Bus bays will be designed at all existing and proposed bus stops as directed by
Riverside Transit Agency and approved by the Department of Public Works.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil
engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
PW -31.
The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
PW - 32. The project shall submit a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O &M)
Agreement that must include the owner's notarized signature, proof of recordation with
the County Recorder's Office, and all maintenance procedures for each of the structural
treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the WQMP.
PW -33.
PW -34.
PW -36.
The project shall demonstrate that all of the structural treatment control BMPs outlined
in the WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans
and are ready for immediate implementation.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive
written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water
District, or other affected agencies.
PW -35. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans
and City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of
Public Works.
PW -37. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
Carolyn Spins Lana
Director
June 9, 2011
WOO 116"M wll :day . slow l0d Manias xe; Ja )lewXyd IdE lenses, seM %Et sly'
City of Temecula Planning Department
FAX: (951) 694 -6477
Attention: Cheryl Kitzerow
RE: Review Comments
GEO No. 2243
City of Temecula Cale No. PA11 -0127
RIVER -_
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Pages 2 (including this cover)
County Geologic Report (GEO) No. 2243 submitted for the City of Temecula project (PAI 1 -0127) was prepared
by Geocon Inland Empire, Inc. and is entitled " Geotechnical and Subsurface Fault Rupture Hazard Investigation,
Proposed Apartments, 28673 -28701 Pujol Street, Temecula, California ", dated April 11, 2011. In addition,
Geocon submitted the following:
"Geologic Evaluation, Multi- Family Residential Development, 28673 -28701 Pujol Street, Temecula, California ",
dated October 18, 2010.
"Report of Observation and Testing Services During Fault Trench Bacldill, Proposed Apartments, 28673 -28701
Pujol Street, Temecula, California ", dated April 7, 2011,
"Response to Riverside County Planning Department Review Comments Dated may 17, 2011, GEO No. 2243,
City of Temecula Case No PA11-0127, Regarding Geotechnical and subsurface Fault Rupture Hazard
Investigation, Proposed Apartments, 28673 -28701 Pujol Street, Temecula, California, Dated April 11, 2011 ",
dated June 2, 2011.
These documents are herein incorporated as a part of 0E002243.
0E002243 concluded:
1. The consultant does not believe active faulting is present on the site.
2. The potential for surface fault rupture at the site is low.
3. The liquefaction analyses indicate that the soil below the groundwater table would not be prone to
liquefaction during a design level ground motion event.
4. The probability of spreading affecting the site is negligible.
5. Dry settlement in the upper 14 feet of soil could be prone to approximately 0.3 inches of total settlement.
6. The consultant does not consider the potential for a landslide to be a hazard to the project.
Riverside Office • 4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor
P.O. Box 1409, Riverside, California 92502-1409
(951) 955.3200 • Fax (951) 955-1811
(Aid 69 9Z-1 LOZ /6/9 :ale4
Desert Office • 38666 El Carib Road
Palm Desert, California 92211
(760) 863.8277• Fax (760) 563-7555
Zit :a6ed 0000SS61S6 :wvid
woo i1.6 ftwa/l: 'uogeuno;ui allow iod lamas xel JaNew)yd Id£ )aniaoaJ sera xe1 slgy
7. The adjacent slopes may pose a debris flow or slope wash hazard to the site.
8. The potential for inundation at the site as a result of an earthquake - induced dam failure is considered low.
9. Tsunamis are not considered a significant hazard at the site.
10. flooding from a seismically-induced seiche is considered unlikely.
11. There appears to be little or no potential for future ground subsidence due to withdrawal of fluids or gases
at the site.
12. The fault trench excavated for this study was backfilled and the placement of fill sail has been performed
in substantial conformance with the requirements of the City of Temecula, 2010 CBC, and the
recommendations of the Geocon report.
0E002243 recommended:
1. Mitigation measures for debris flows which could occur immediately west of (adjacent) to the site
include measures designed to intercept and or deflect earth deposits on the site.
2. The upper five feet of existing site soils should be excavated and properly compacted for foundation and
slab support.
0E002243 satisfies the requirement for a Geologic Study for Planning / CEQA purposes. GE002243 is hereby
accepted for Planning purposes. This approval is intended, and should not be misconstrued as approval for
grading permit. Engineering and other building code parameters will be reviewed and additional comments
and/or conditions may be imposed by the Building and Safety Department upon application for grading and/or
building permits.
Please call me at (951) 955 -6863 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Carolyn Syms Luna, Director
vi d L. Jones, CEG No. 2283
Chief Engineering Geologist, TLMA - Planning
Attachments: Review Comments
cc: Project Geologist: Paul Theriault, Fax: (951) 304 -2392
Project Rep: Jay Ross, Fax: (818) 706 -3752
File: 0E002243
8:1Geologr\Temecula Revlewa1GE002243 for PAt 1 -0127.docx
1d 65 9Z I. 1.1.0Z/6/9 :alep Z/Z :36ed 0000556 LS6 :wad
April 26, 2011
9 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY 9
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRON HEALTH
City of Temecula Planning Department
Attention: Cheryl Kitzerow
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
At ft
sfr: ? 92 911
RE: Development Plan (DP) No. PA11 -0127 ( Related Pre-App cases PA11- d PA11 -01 ,9)
Dear Cheryl:
Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the development plan for a multi - family residential
Development Plan application for Portola Terrace, to construct 45 apartment units and a parking
structure on 1.53 acres located at 28673/28681/28701 Pujol Street. (APN 922 - 062 -003).
The site plan does indicate water and sewer services exist in Pujol Street. We assume that these
services will be available but RCWD should indicate with mylar drawings to the City Public Works
engineer how these connections will be made available.
1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHALL
BE REQUIRED•
a) "Will- serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewer district.
b) Please contact DEH Hazardous Materials at 951.766.6524 regarding the storage of any
chemicals for the washers and dryers and pool/spa chemicals.
c) For the NEW Swimming pool/spa, please contact plan check at 951.461.0284.
Gregor Dellenbach, REHS
(951) 955 -8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of
Environmental Health clearance.
EHS 1100427
Local Eofo can
and Use and Water Eng.needng • 1330 R 80.58 CA 8230
• 0 89583 • 5835 90 581 -9553 • 4080 i Eill on e ,t1. F d.. —de 0.1 92.501
OF • 005 159 -8 • FAX :909 955 -8903 • 10130 1_,8030 Si eet. 2nd Poor Ri v:,.de 05 92551
May 26, 2011
EILAR ASSOCIATES INC.
"Environmental & acoustical consulting services since 1974"
Mr. Jay Ross
Amcal Multi- Housing, Inc.
30141 Agoura Road, Suite 100
Agoura Hills, Califomia 91301 -4332
RE: Historical Status of the Arviso House located on the Amcal Portola Terrace Project Site,
City of Temecula, Riverside County
Dear Mr. Ross:
As per our recent conversation, this letter is to provide you with a synopsis of our historical research
on the Arviso House that is situated within your above - referenced development project. Briefly,
the Arviso House was originally located at the southwest corner of Fourth and Mercedes Streets and
carried the address of 41915 Fourth Street. It was constructed in 1910 and was the home of Mr. and
Mrs. Ventura Arviso. Mr, Arviso worked on the Vail Ranch but we can make no significant
historical connections with Mr. Arviso or his wife.
As originally constructed, the residence was a simple house, L- shaped in plan with a gabled roof,
clapboard siding and a screened front porch. It was completely wood- fiamed and likely set on either
a fieldstone or earthen foundation sill. The residence was first inventoried in 1982 by the Riverside
Historical Commission as part of their county -wide historical building survey.
The residence was purchased by the current owners Otto and Nancy Baron in 1997. The Baron's
utilized the building as an antique and curio store. It was during this time that the Baron's
significantly altered the appearance of the building by grafting the facade of an old retail building
to the front of the house. The Baron's also stripped off the original clapboard siding and replaced
it with salvaged siding from the same building from which they obtained the facade.
The Baron's moved the Arviso House to its current location on Pujol Street in 2007. Since moving
the building, it appears that the Barons have replaced the siding once again with modern wood
planking that has been weathered to look old. Additionally, the roof covering has also been replaced
with fiberglass shake shingles, also meant to appear old.
From a historical standpoint, it is our opinion that the building lost its integrity of location and
setting when it was moved from its original location in 2007. More importantly, the simple
architecture of the house was destroyed by the addition of the mercantile facade and the modern
plank siding. The L- shaped floor plan, however, appears to remain intact. In conclusion, the Arviso
House does not appear to comprise a significant historical resource at the federal, state or local
levels due primarily to the aforementioned reasons.
539 Encinitas Blvd., # 206, Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 753 -1865 fx: (760) 783 -2597
www.eilarassociates.com
Although no additional work prior to demolition is warranted, it is recommended that the demolition
of the build be monitored and any unique or unusual construction techniques noted and
photographed. A more in -depth discussion of the Arviso House and the proposed mitigation
measures will appear in the full report. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
RSW:file;arvisohouse
by email
Very truly yours,
Robert S. White
Archaeological/Paleontological Director
TEMECULA VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
March 2, 2011
Patrick Richardson
Planning Department
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
Mr. Richardson:
Currently there is an old building on temporary blocks at 28681 Pujol Street in Temecula. This building,
commonly known as the Arviso House, was originally located at the northwest comer of 4 and Mercedes
Streets, and in recent years was significantly altered while at that location.
By action of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Historical Society we are hereby notifying the
City of Temecula, and other interested parties, that we have no interest in the structure and authorize
removing it from the list of historic buildings in Temecula.
The Temecula Valley Historical Society is saddened to loose another historic structure in Temecula, but, in
this case, see no other alternative.
Cordially, eA �,�,E�
Bonnie Martland
President
Temecula Valley Historical Society
Case Nos:
Applicant:
Proposal:
Environmental:
Case Planner:
Place of Hearing:
Date of Hearing:
Time of Hearing:
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below
PA11 -0127 and PA11 -0129
Jay Ross, on behalf of AMCAL Multi- Housing, Inc.
A multi - family residential Development Plan for Portola Terrace, a three -story
apartment complex consisting of 44 affordable units, one manager's unit, and a
two -story parking structure on 1.53 acres. Associated case includes PA11 -0129, a
Certificate of Historical Appropriateness to remove the Arviso House, located at
28681 Pujol Street, from the Historic Structures Map.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Determination
will be filed in compliance with CEQA Section 15162, Subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations
Cheryl Kitzerow, (951) 694 -6409
City of Temecula, Council Chambers
August 3, 2011
6:00 p.m.
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and
be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for
judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and
controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or
proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the
Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice.
The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main
Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be
addressed to the case planner.
C:1Prog ram Fi I es1N eevi a . Com\Docu me nt Converterltem p11011401. doc