The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About092111 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Kight Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of September 7, 2011 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -52 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 MEETING: Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0145, PA10 -0146, PA10 -0147 and PA10 -0148, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single- family cluster lots, a Residential Home Product Review for 45 lots, a Zoning Map and text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO), and a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential, located west of Butterfield State Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 To be continued to October 5, 2011 4 Planning Application No. PA11 -0225, a Minor Modification to an approved Conditional Use Permit for NewPath /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in a revised location in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court, Matt Peters RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0225, A MINOR MODIFICATION (REVISED LOCATION) TO AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN 2 (NODE TM -10) IN A REVISED LOCATION IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CROWN HILL DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 68' NORTHWEST OF SAGE COURT 5 Planning Application No. PA11 -0175, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Fish House Vera Cruz to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47, located at 26700 Ynez Road, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- 6 Planning Application No. PA11 -0033, a Major Modification to allow the Vail Ranch Headquarters to create a phasing plan and make project revisions consisting of landscape and building modifications, located approximately 900 feet southeast of the Redhawk Parkway and Wolf Store Road intersection, Eric Jones ADJOURNMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0175, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXISTING FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ LOCATED AT 26700 YNEZ ROAD TO UPGRADE THEIR EXISTING LIQUOR LICENSE FROM A TYPE 41 TO A TYPE 47 (APN 921 -750 -001) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0033, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW THE VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS TO CREATE A PHASING PLAN AND MAKE PROJECT REVISIONS CONSISTING OF LANDSCAPE AND BUILDING MODIFICATIONS, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET SOUTHEAST OF THE REDHAWK PARKWAY AND WOLF STORE ROAD INTERSECTION (APN 960- 010 -044) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, October 5, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the 3 Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website at www.citvoftemecula.orq. 4 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: ABSENT: CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET SEPTEMBER 7, 2011 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Harter Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio KIGHT COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Subcommittee Members for the Jefferson Corridor Stakeholder Interviews RECOMMENDATION: 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 11 -51 1.1 Approve the Minutes of August 3, 2011 APPROVED 4- 0 -1 -0, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CAREY, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; KIGHT ABSENT 2.1 Select two Planning Commission Members for Subcommittee COMMISSION APPOINTED COMMISSIONER CAREY AND COMMISSIONER KIGHT TO THE JEFFERSON CORRIDOR PLANNING COMMISSION STEERING COMMITTEE Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0082, a Development Plan for two new commercial buildings totaling 11,713 square feet located at 40135 Village Road within the Harveston Specific Plan, Eric Jones APPROVED 4- 0 -1 -0, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; KIGHT ABSENT RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11 -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0082, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR TWO NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TOTALING 11,713 SQUARE FEET AT 40135 VILLAGE ROAD WITHIN THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN (APN 916 -560 -006) 4 Planning Application Nos. PA10 -0145, PA10 -0146, PA10 -0147 and PA10 -0148, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single- family cluster lots, a Residential Home Product Review for 45 lots, a Zoning Map and text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO), and a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential, located west of Butterfield State Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos, Matt Peters CONTINUE TO SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 4- 0 -1 -0, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; VOICE VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; KIGHT ABSENT RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: 4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10- 0148, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL" (APNS 957- 170 -032 THROUGH -036) PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10- 0147, AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING 2 MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT" (APNS 957- 170 -032 THROUGH -036) 4.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10- 0145, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36295 TO SUBDIVIDE 25 GROSS ACRES INTO 45 LOTS AND ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE LOCATED EAST OF WALCOTT LANE AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND 1,100 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS" (APNS 957- 170 -032 THROUGH -036) 4.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10- 0146, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR WALCOTT ESTATES LOCATED EAST OF WALCOTT LANE AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND 1,100 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS" (APNS 957 - 170 -032 THROUGH -036) 4.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR A ZONE CHANGE AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FROM VL- VERY LOW DENSITY TO L -LOW DENSITY WITH A PDO; A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO SUBDIVIDE 25 ACRES INTO 45 LOTS; AND A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED EAST OF WALCOTT LANE AND WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1,500 FEET NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND 1,100 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS" (APNS 957 - 170 -032 THROUGH -036) 3 REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, September 21, 2011, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Pat Kight Chairman 4 Patrick Richardson Director of Planning and Redevelopment Date Case No. Proposal Applicant Action August 18, 2011 PA11 -0009 A Tentative Parcel Map No. 36358 to allow one existing parcel to be divided into three separate parcels, located at the southwest corner of Landings Road and Village Road within the Harveston Specific Plan Lou Kashmere LSK, LLC APPROVED TO: Planning Commission FROM: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment DATE: September 21, 2011 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report Planning Director's Agenda items for August, 2011 Attachment: Action Agenda CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM PUBLIC COMMENTS Item No. 1 1:30 p.m. ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING August 18, 2011 1:30 P.M. TEMECULA CITY HALL Great Oak Conference Room 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Patrick Richardson, Director of Planning and Redevelopment A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Planning Director on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Planning Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Planning Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Project Number: PA11 -0009 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map Project Title: Harveston TPM 36358 Applicant: Lou Kashmere of LSK, LLC Project Description: A Tentative Parcel Map No. 36358 to allow one existing parcel to be divided into three separate parcels Location: Southwest corner of Landings Road and Village Road within the Harveston Specific Plan Environmental Action: CEQA Section 15315, Class 15 Minor Land Division Project Planner: Eric Jones ACTION: APPROVED C:1Program Files \Neevia.Com \Document Converter\temp11015671.doc TO: Planning Commission FROM: Matt Peters, Associate Planner DATE: September 21, 2011 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: PA10 -0145 (Tentative Tract Map), PA10 -0146 (Home Product Review), PA 10- 0147 (Zone Change), and PA10 -0148 (General Plan Amendment); Walcott Estates Staff is recommending that Walcott Estates (PA10 -0145 thru PA10 -0148) be continued to the October 5, 2011 Planning Commission hearing. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: BACKGROUND SUMMARY STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 21, 2011 Matthew D. Peters, AICP, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA11 -0225, a Minor Modification (revised location) to an approved Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in a revised location in the City of Temecula right -of- way on the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court. (Related Case PA11 -0106) Approve with Conditions CEQA: Notice of Determination (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, three other nodes are located outside the City boundary (one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. 1 The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility poles and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights -of -way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae inside radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc.) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of four -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. ANALYSIS Given the large size of the overall project, City staff has worked with NewPath /Crown Castle to break the project down into manageable batches of approximately four to eleven Planning Applications for each hearing. This first batch was approved on March 16, 2011 and included the following seven nodes: TM -01; TM -02; TM -03; TM -05; TM -17; TM -39; and TM -41. Each node in the first batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The second batch was approved on May 4, 2011 and included the following five nodes: TM -15, TM -21, TM -27, TM -30, and TM -42. Nodes TM -15, TM -27 and TM -30 will include three antennas attached to existing wood utility poles, while the remaining two nodes will be designed as concrete street light poles similar to those approved in batch 1. 2 The third batch was approved on May 18, 2011 and included the following three nodes: TM -9, TM -11, and TM -14. Node TM -18 was continued for redesign due to neighborhood concerns. Of these nodes, three are designed as concrete street light poles similar to those previously approved, and one (TM -14) will be attached to an existing wood utility pole. The fourth batch was approved on June 1, 2011 and included the following six nodes: TM -22, TM -23, TM -24, TM -31, TM -33, and TM -36. Each node in the fourth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. The fifth batch was approved on July 6, 2011 and included the following 11 nodes: TM -25, TM- 29, TM -04, TM -06, TM -07, TM -08, TM -10, TM -12, TM -13, TM -16, and TM -19. Each node in the fifth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 was continued at the July 6, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. A neighbor testified that he pulled a building permit for a pool house, which would be within the 75' setback from an antenna to a residence. However, staff found that the permit was for a gunite pool and spa. No plans have been submitted or permits pulled for a pool house. The sixth batch was approved on July 20, 2011 and included the following six nodes (plus two continued from previous meetings): TM -20, TM -26, TM -28, TM -32, TM -37, and TM -38. Each node in the sixth batch was designed as a concrete street light pole with cobra light arm attachment to match existing street lights in the City right -of -way. Node TM -13 is discussed above. Node TM -18 was continued at the May 18, 2011 Planning Commission hearing to the July 20, 2011 hearing. However, the applicant requested that TM -18 be further continued off calendar to allow time to review an alternative involving locating on an existing wood utility pole. In addition, Node TM -28 was also continued off calendar for relocation as well. In summary, 37 of 39 nodes have been approved. Staff is awaiting final plans on TM -18 and TM -28. The street lights will have the same finish and light arm attachment as a standard Southern California Edison street light. The only minor differences between the poles besides the antenna rays will be a slightly larger outside diameter (eight inches for standard SCE light pole versus ten inches for NewPath /Crown Castle), and a taller overall height (32 feet versus approximately 40 feet high). It should be noted that the top of the luminaire or light fixture will be 32 feet for consistency along the street right -of -way. This application is a Minor Modification to change the approved location of TM -10 from the west side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 70' southeast of the centerline of Pauba Road to the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court. Staff received an appeal from a neighbor, Shellie Clack concerning the approved location. The applicant worked with Ms. Clack and City staff on the revised location, which is intended to be less visible than at the corner of Pauba Road and Crowne Hill Drive and backs up to open space instead of residential backyard. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on September 8, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration approved on March 16, 2011 and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures. The antennas have been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. 4 The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS NewPath /Crown Castle DAS Master Plan Map Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Initial Study - Mitigated Negative Declaration Mitigation Monitoring Program Notice of Public Hearing 5 NORM t -- M CROWN eITY Of• RIVIi RAIN( COOK IV GF>i c'ea Vasa_ kma) r t wr nirr MINIM - NK MOM wr! 0 NODE LO<AiIo/`lS dlGltillTY MAP TM -10 NEW CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE NORTH SIDE CROWN HILL RD., 68' NORTHWEST OF CENTERLINE OF SAGE COURT TEMECULA, CA 92592 APPLICANT CROWN CASTLE CONTACTS meow CM.. 04512E 01F(Pt11*WV M 412K...04 04 4- p .1 E1011090 9 2A 04 0 (141 M.A1. 114. (916) '61 - 0100 !C1.Cr 51CPrt0 U*C0. .1 Cam* 0 .091 (917) 011 5219 WW1. 0p00 04 (24041 5904010 S0 00 . 7 07 2 1NV011 PC MAO P.OH (90) 211.lw 94•27, 000004&NO. Wen NOW 0.74 (OM) .61 -1)52 JURISDICTION 4 • 0 b lI0Mu0 . 1900 900 St l6wsuu e. 99599 740 r■tour 1 11 90. -100 1 vu! (9.111 691 -6119 ENGINEERING FIRMISURVEYING r. .-4-4010 oOI. K *142 CPC 0140011 COORDINATES CODE COMPLIANCE: 00.0 .100 0441.1 00 •IPI)l000 0 M 6 f011eteRe OCAS S AS AMMO ✓71104/1 50,025 . or 9210001 4SU IOCN./00/O0*4t1 09)201 ;15 • 0004 *0.70010119,+0[*. COON 2 CAL 200011 0 10S0.01 0101. 90. 11102 51 • 1:0 W1 r PO S •A ( P • 01.4 0 ! M9L •i TM( .11G(O1R1 COVP.00 10 IX R.= ((1j 311 COPeann 10110 1011 PO00 0(1) OOn L I!• 0. 104 10[+01 mimes *Cr .. S5 1...41. wont. D Cr ! 317r. IOW 4b• Wok* 04..0170.117 [ ! 4640 0)0 1 *21 COW! AGOG. 114L(404) 1, N•1 1.• 14A WR( %MAI Attt610e MAN Awo 1!111+ •1CI113 41Ab2 x100404. 12+ NWT 102.10 016001 Of ▪ PAM O1ziW01 CIS C '9 111/* 0500 1.9 ML Mt et e)nleS.01 0GC111 • 6020.21 901 -+-4105 Mlyo4M. t NOV.. 110449.10 AM 1y 121[0 01 Tl 4 10 9411 T2 41111I wRS 010 10/011 T3 wwlmuer 11104 P1 ,P< M4IG1 Al 9i nr A2 (2014006 A3 42/411/4 VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION DATA TABLE w0L00111- < - 10 0004 1Y! 919 P1 9011*1 t b OM111.. b UV Mel 21/2 wJMi 0041 b 171 0/ MC 004 0 ✓A N/A WA O/ i9.C11n {1211+ 20. Pot /6 SHEET INDEX 47 0.110 S1nMC0i ON'.6' / 100021 "941110 0014 TM -10 .-21 !U_ tl0 r`� Pttl Sclo Pqt CO PROJECT NO SCA -007 REV DATE 1/13/1) 1/13/11 0/26/11 OESCPIPIION CPV t0 190+ 97 0901 NO 040 1 551210 7Ott: ISSUE PLANS PREPARED 01 /41) Maximize Comm j�� Group. Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SURE 100 CORONA. CA 92882 CWICE (909) 780 -2770 FAX (903)'92- 31t CUENT 1100 DEXTER AVE SUITE 250 SEATTLE. WA 98109 4r■nOw*e05114 e9m SRE NO TM -10 74496E 4 ADDRESS= (,14CULA NETWORK ocr, 10 • w 1EUECUTA CA 92512 S VN:6 1 /1L'MOCR T1, 3 � ANTENNA 6 CA LE 9C1191UIE 0019.7 woo • M� 0,1* 41 / KW OM 001, 444 $ . 018: 00 440 (5 M 0010 U J 1/7' a %j1 5*, I1 A 0 11 a 1/I' now 109 111 0 0 CTS .0 >••2• 7 I/7 Oho.v».s9.46:on.4 •w# *10+(940041 L EGEND 7 0O% WC. 1101 1641 AY( 0 (A➢ 40001100 __ lantana ■677410 WRI '.• 00 1 719 , 0000 410 FA WNJt`(84 000 4:41 - .040005•*7 400 Q -•-� 10101 �"-• •04 .mL1 - __ C18A0 0.4000116 -�0- H1000C 040711 ___1_ -_ ((10410(0(09000 0- 444.901 C001:0 -[ - - a600VL 004.1 it 001076 aaa - -000 4*066•76 V0 -pp-. tat (1 Wen. -i•� 4070, 4*a IIAI\ 4 04 '6 11- s1mr• ta1-11403. Ac 10 .10.15 1 4 034/0(9( 01 044 4100. 10 la M 60. - 1.60 ' 000. 00 1 . 0 7 • (019 4 01 1 0 0 at • 1(004951 009 070901. 0040- 0U0 i [pf40_ 00011 0 WIN w.00(0 410 0949'.964 044 IM 10 10440 900 .0 000 AI 10007 070 - 0740 W F0 008)00160 0 0 0,> 10 0009.4 0.10. 00 1*a01 ▪ 00008 60 510 .'61 08 0 71 IA0• *104• 0 1 0* 0U01089 0 8 .0 0 00 7000 ( 044 - 1 ran 001.19846 910 06.28 264,7 044: 1 MA :a1(:0� 11' 040.4,7 ro 7 0001 . 1, A' 04 7050.1 ,0 7• Al 00 d Ma, 94(0851 0 :.w A 1A( 10 .17' Flan 1, ( / 9. MOO 0' 011 11000 1 r00 519 N 11 i01 0O }' '1 W 017 111. m0 V M, AT 040400' •41 4 907 014010 070.0 (04 110 007 1/4 0141 9001 >1t04)0.401014.84 (9 . 10' IMAM 0051* 77.7 011881 ,817 9 94616 '• Loaf 005495 AAO 4' 0:808 l (M 0717 .01 7.14 00 (091111 •2' 4 1('01801 00 0*0 9M0741rL 0 10.410 079 000 7711.7 91 109 1.v0Y12 0411044 77 4*c 0701 cl : 8*3 0015109101(11040(4( MM1 00 1194Ju +. 040 L K .5400( 9110 441((40 p 44 044 40 1176 40 '.219ar M0)M W MM(0U O 070100 4 M <tY (0910 1 1(00400 0 00**0*022 COMM 010000 11111 a • •9*5 .073C0(.40000984(417180.11 0 0.71942 V AC 71017104*8411741191 A• non 7 +00. 000 7 17.1.0410.+11444(41 CLW 410 MO TUMa 111 At 0 A (00 10((700 2011 0.7, 060 0414. 'A 174*1017* 04411)67 410017[ 401001 OW CONSTRUCTION GENERAL NOTES M WM= Wu if 3•J t.l Mt VAT 10.0086 .171 MYMM EOM U.N. M.-v on 107.0 CO [1 0. 008,1100 4 NO 104 *4 NEI 111010010 MN01.. N*0/0* 015119 0 00 11510100( 0 CMFIK 4,0095 00 (0 411 101101 • 810001 9a 9'0.109'1 W4 ft NANO ..0 4001104. Of A 101 50.1. 1000 01(100 • 1809 0 9(00 9 (1[04.4. 9••11 k NO at 47301 at M 0040'11014'0 510044 M 7106' 7 � 700 106 kU 91 O 070.141 070.141 Oa 40041 Y 0C 401 0001 1101 AMP H 0909 AVM 0 MW'- U1 d9 NMI W0( in M1 IA. 77. +10 0700 WOO A/K 1 0010 *140)010.60110 M 7 0.03 .6 ift.66 1161.(OVIt Ms 1.7 7 O 07 nc '0 WOW 0105 1.1 4 7A9J m 41 sT avert M w* 1010 II 0 8 .191 O C001. 1 •01406.17 RAM 00611 0*1400 MO 10810(00* NOW 00114 280\ 001007 8 00 6 AL SM4(a01 I MOM.. ant 7 004.(40(50) INV 70107.0106 *0100 /194MY 00), 411740 M a4W10 444010 000!4g41 071.4: 001690 449 .13 �017M .1N0 28 0•4 41.001a 0 004 19 tH MN d NC 00000A 0019 O9.. NO • 411W000 N DO ON . 0 0 1010910 17 001 N 0.00. n oto. 0. 14 O a 0.07 0' .70 9100 IK 1 1 91!60414 41449 7 M 11 00/00 .720 N 0E. 0. A 0 0744 4940, 10 009 fro 9.000. 1107 N 74 wo400 4.61 02411 M 09060040 4111 090 +U Mr 41111104.. MAC 10411.0 ru > 0 Kw,. 094 540012 A 00000010.0 4(90 007 (I into Ono fool co 40970 046 904 6 4 OD .t. 4.47 100101 WI 110 10o01 sou O*/q we/ 002 (06600* 44 M �9 0 4 0 17 1 , 1170. l I x 7 07 470 4 1 1 0070 t l b 0 1 N woo p.Wt [ toon 0 cco 00 I .183 > 0.0.183 +,O 00 0.4 8014 SM. 4 60 004.0 90 My 4004•1• .1 09+ 0 0 2YI F (M uh 11{1 rpppul�C lY 070 4041( .f> V 149 00 111940“ (5X /Of 40 I n 700 41( 041;0(1 001 loaf 1 19 0 *] 0 0* M Y MA 00 on WOK • 0904007 010004 0404(0 1044 73916 i1 0010 4104000) 807 (1Yt 1 060 00117 0 04001 711-040 u0.b. ON O( p,vM 07 0048tH 00110 M (4 004909 40 9064 CA11C IoOS 1004. 4[ 7aa K.+R rN 64541 -viou 149141 1791,00(. 10 211. 4%0004 01Mt 4 4504■1 1a 01030 0 27 0.0'•0 504 4£.. 00 1(100199 10(i1 0 171 484441 01915 I T.7; 3NM 4'474 . rw ) 414 (907 11 A 41..01 a 14 5cwa9.. 076146x1.:94111 404. 022.4 ( 01 co D M ram .if � W C 212(*9i%I v WC i 1(4019* ra rO (wllavc a rt64c .9T I0. f 1101 4 M 2 7)K00.01 0 M 111 .700100 10 49190 04 0474 0 7003 070 6. Nark 6481 01414.00 I .1690 000 40440 F 011400 co. O00710' (0 14 114 070 00011 MO 0411 1 91fp m (0,111 1, moIh 11.8049(aa(I54 10)0114 0' 4 4 11 yi p0 000 0440 if 0 07(C0 a,C lm 1 90 n)R u) 00.0 0011 fa n. 4004 (41 44 04109101434091401101 004, 411400 9 1001 0 AO 500.1 000. 6111,0 AO. 44747380 =LAE I 84001010 CAN IN W4Oa.>1MA1080>411. 001 30024 I41 MO COR R. 490711*( 01014 M 040:700 OW 14 9 0' 0084. ('b 1(040. 107.0 M SY71 O 71 40110. 701M 001144 484400((9w 41110 MO 014 4410 0 1.1 04..0.4 60 CWm15 846000 00 Y ,g l w 11 0 4 NA 4 0 14 0110041 0 Ox Of V M .4( l M6 IOflU 7 IO109 A M 10 `R 0 /F %010'4 00 Nog0,1 YC 000744* 0(RA gm. 47 .0 .7 Ir7 94(1 MAY 00000091k1904 8049•01. (9I10 00084*0 0( 0 MY1 on. 91 00004 90 04+000. 1.010> r000100'01 WOO F1400, 1M1 0Y0(W4f4041011Ow0,10I, 74 0 00471 Ilk 001.4001080.Cr n'ftS010CNO 9)4411 IMO, A 9/0 41000 9[ IM/0 Oft 10 Cr 0. M 10( 01 MO 0 , 001 40 '.9 (*130.10 Si. tiff 1110* 0 , 4 1101 0 0.104.10. 40 000 .0f 10401100 Al OUR 09401(10 9 *vat to 4M 101 > K 0NK. W 1 0 .04 n4 070 A M 766an 0 670 404 00 117. 07Ntr O 01 Mann Wt. 004076 4140 m 105 a101 SW: Cr A0r 0010000. W 091140 • M 014 0114 040 Wan MOAN 40001 14 Wild at MWNM0010 P. M 0\01.0041440 OWN. Ra) 6a904l0 Oat a H 00014 W *Mif eras 01' Nil • •t TM 10001011 1010((11 141000.074 NO 101 M Al COCOA 000 NO 0100 K (VS M 0 100 K 0490 WO. 0.001 (M: 7 0400 • .M WEAN 0 IN ON ONO OM 000191 01 Al 0*87>. 0 Iw1 Iw 407 0(9 0400100 0306101 006 5 1 0800 Cr if 0(91 594 8 1000. 4070 1 X00 50 6 A 9P➢( M 99019 1> 0100.1 00000 11 1 11 0 0000 . OM4r a 89601E U 4a 04(((56,14 ut 4100+ POW 1015 700 .01 IM KCM110 win 0441000 MI 1911 036 46,44.1. N Or. 1001 0 94 0 024 .440 O# M N OM01061l 19011 0 14 46401 0 8,8408010 IM 990404 00701 17 410[1 W0B{A4 0A16n>0 sa46.7R07109. WOW .0Nn04: a 9f;410Or fitQ01 .00 OHS 0 WOW 0C?a 01011 K 95101 0074* A 60000 \001 090 411 IIaRO 1.1 0 l4(*I 4#1 4001 50 001109 0 0L 0000 I1*((t 7 04:496 940 Of W11 WO SUMS A 100477 00 .00001 MO 9 04000 6066000 0( 109 4 0010001 a 0 111 l 1 M 0 gz. CO. I '(o>W1 0 00 w 000059,100.0 4<4 4: C X✓nLW19 �'ft 4> 1 0 0 11 0{( r r (M I 9 1m:41r 00 0 ( 9 34 4 Ob 001rI04'N 46 CMo 0 . M O * 019* MO 4 0.M nt O 14• M 701•4'00 Oran <R1•• k,•„w wnar. below. CaIlbeforo you dig. .2144 048.0 0008.05 00+0404194.0 /9DN9 A'O M (04041 If rag 00.44, 2811 A x.100. 7 1 K 40 N :90001 M1 4 099 :0'1 HtO MA ...CI 0 M 0.00/ 1419 )5001 60710007 A5 08 I KO.. 900 14 7...740100 CC 0.11110 0 O.) 00 ii 871, 995110 0070 W*1 7*% POP 0+49 801901 (011109. (1 O (0 6.O YOE 148( AO. 40 *16.09 60410 V %043 *0014 1 10 4f6 ,00*I , 1000 (4141.110 00.0 4.014 0) co WOO V•I 11601 004 401 O O.t 4 9t01 M I M sae 1 0 00 (41 9 40 00 00 Olt 091 (4 COMM 940 NOW (0 MONO 6.4510 1014 M O 001 1 0 4 *109l1 9 0 1 0 0v.12 a OMOWOV V 91I170941a 04w. 411 10080.000. *0111110 700 OM PP 14.0 1604W0000)t1 4 . 1701 WOO • 14 WARN Wu 7 07(01600.•0 04 0401 0681 1 ➢140 CM 0.6 OR 0000P 4. soli 4 no row o AI 0071 %+( 9A. N 70(5100* WOOS 9011 R OW.0 SR 4 (01[49. I6?005 9100011.4,0 a,• -' CEO.. Cr 1041681 S(K0f M9 40 6 AIN. 615 eq RO 0 Imo. ( 00 / 0 it .1 u ev( 410 606 31-Ott 1.01 04.0 lot • 0 /0000004/1 03440 40100 0014144000 000 AL 494,1 00 14 ■ 90.67 -' N 4100 1.,000NC 64080010 ar,014.000 004100(40X*1(1 1 ' , 004 9 >! 4000(6[ 140 R 0(9004( 40 (074 94 MM. 010000> (01N0 0144 #O0 0b 1811 NM MOOD •1100 01CM. A 090{07. 0040 Maw*. 67 wag: 14 44 41 i 1 1(00t . 04 11M00/00A01 COME 01 9040 coo..n MA n( 911A.0 0'111x0111 10440 It 0007 600 4400 110.N4U AF11(1 401 b*7WV 11. M 00 0 14 SP1 4 IN MC1Np 0 0410 0010 09 0 01((0..0 a081 S64 9WT* A 1400 M 04410 0+110001 .4 I0 0 0( 900 two 001 MO. 01.4 0100Ao MAW 10111 Aril fry fano ■• 000000 O 43444(!(401 CM IM1H 11/10/10 11 tam* .0.001 n w 07717111 049010ACM 0000 *46 02.1(H110) A A* 0:410 rn(• 44 110••• 40017451 0010 440 taxa 0>994 5447737*014. 4 00 M ■0 meita ((011. M 001 667 6f Wart '0 >t 14(4(0/460 Co GENERAL NOTES 2 W all 7 1 n00a0 0 0.e0 41841• 0'4/0' K'r Y t 4 4 05 .0 84.0 64+ 10 [00070 INN 10r 17656 M 0 100 0.8. A W IIY MRxY 1 0 17 4 ,00 CA 0"10 d 550. 07 77 0. 3014 Irl (1/1 M 1 fronf Leaf ■0 .079 Not 01 , 0 ( 2' 08. Oaf A 100.0 04;009000 Cr .0 I VIC 00'001180 40 40( 1401009 In 010001 t 000 I /0 C1YO CW 00 0011005 mi. 08.1 07,(10 1 28 .4O 19x+,11 c.uw .1 catx4 0144 A+•9 -o.v 1� 1 � f91vC.0 iw NEB- 11O.pW� 1 010511 0. 19�iiw 1111( u '90/, M 1 C 1 1,4116•• , 4515( 0 03 101411411. 4 0 M 0' 0 7 Own v. It 047117M V MKt WO ma 1 111,107 1410150 /t Won form may 40 000 v.R1 0 10 Irw 5. 0170 . : . . 0 •a • sow 1 M904 011 • 0 11 la6 6m • 4 a a( a Nat 0 041/ 34.00, 010 ?11411617.1 .76476 VA 3 LOADING AND ANTENNA CABLE SCHEDULES 1,1 ( TM - 10 cOleant i+ctf' •..i OOU SCA -007 1 00 5E812700, 0(51• 00 10, to OAS) 1/13/11 1 /15 /11 7//0/11 0015 f 1044 CO!{7 +r, PW15 700(700600 O7 J • Maximize Comm. iii Group, Inc. 1351 4445;`:. .. 57011 100 C0R00101. CA 92112 00110E: (009) 705 -2170 0010; (909) 902 -3 par 11 1(001(4 AVL 51010 254 1 C. WA 99109 iM -10 1,■00 & 90045055: ik LC1iU1 HGWORK NOD( 1O ..'4094111.. 0404..141 0 to • 325_' T2 3) ICN.MI7W /I9P • Product SpBl o0on • •re•••.rw•o le W 1.•• n.r..I.A 1111.- ••••• ...•r • ••• ANDREW ION- M17HP -19P I n ./••••w R•I••♦ •• N•'s.. • M••••.I '.I3 . 14 •w rf� I-A• •:.• 1SpT11REI aewerla'r NM IM76 SCALA DIVISION WIRaO1MDNApNINA*NA9NN1 vet 1104••••• ••':::° n r••• .• 11.311 r w.,• • - M•1• a♦•.ror.. 11• IVjr. •rul ✓ I.rs• • .••1•• +Wn riser,. v1 �-•aa r...— tae•..J ▪ ..ii..Qrl:: • ..a • If• M' ►Ar -. -R !310115 NCO... 6.4 •.... ••44.• ••■:•:•.•• TATT a•••.•C :::r . •• V (d.� g =4.4.8...1.44........4.44.4.4. IP f!•-2110••0 YI•A •• •3w•« S ,e -• •.1 •✓f: -. , r r:Q - ..wo IYAO'.Ah rte; ,! ... I "+'�� • vY..•••••••;T• eat ♦r•Mn•••e•+r1•- •- •n•.- i•nn•n KpTHREIR SCALA DIVISION :::. "+.a M•Y I go owe .wNn wrl• ri.ti..•. . are ..• 11.y ••..•.. .rY...•.a'.. - t ,hlly.YV:ueb• • • ••rr• K6sy,e.v E- •r••••••• •-•�Ie •1114 ✓ .* .. ,I 4 1 '- ., ., ., .f ni 9C•d•- > r ed-. .. .... yI Y11 fi . RIP at. w r:�:. .:.• �' 9»— V Ans. IV•r. 00010270 85' T• -000o, Ar910o ..•••arm 11••1 ..ef. 1 .; w •rr ✓.- •A ♦r•.M 11Mti 411 nay w Iv 14, r. KATHREIN ANTENNA 840 10525 KATHREIN ANTENNA 800 -10270 11 co P00000T NO SCA -007 TM -10 rpNCP(LSI DATE 1/13/11 1 /13/11 ]/$6/11 .SIRD fORI CURRENT 15300 DM ••ATA 0000.010 OY F Maximize Ccmm. p Group, Inc. 1351 POMONA ROAD SLATE 100 C0R0NA, CA 92682 OFFICE (909) 700 -2170 FAA (909) 992 -3113 011001. CRR.WN (. %1.S 1. (. 100 090900 MC 5011E 250 SEATTLE, WA 98109 10wne•sde.e000 &Gan TOIL 1 S LIFE Af i�') SITE NO.: TM -10 511E NAME & AOORCSS IfUECUI,1 NEJWWORK NOR 10 a am hl 1.. 7E MECUU 08 9250? -9AWN BY 1 CPEC<F..D BY '. ' \ 00 I AT S hit N0V00'• T3 3} PHOTOSIM \YICINITY MAP 1T4 SITE PHOTO - VIEW 2 - PROXIMATELY 50' FROM NODE LOCATION SITE PHOTO - VIEW 1- APPROXIMATELY 45' FROM NODE LOCATION 1„1 W 1 T NA -10 ... sunt ,od pat Cu PRXXCI •e3 SCA-007 .e" OAT( 04/ A.,3111311 7/26/11 3 ''■ OE Sr:013 WV' nr. 10. .[VS. Roma 3,11 GS C uf 3 PCNI 160 cSSOC DArt rAi4 6 /11i Maximize Comm. Wo Group, Inc. 22810209 9030 , 2oO220. CA 92882 3 !o029) 726-2.29 cAx , .o1) 992-3 1 (2 • (A' CROWN r 50960' P1 1)00 3E9 0i3 5221(3 23,0 0,311.:7 Kr FM- 10 toWE & ADDRESS ILMECULA RPM Kg 10 TEMfr,‘ ,4 4?f•trZ \,.... (r,r 5rt r. 83 3((2600 91f'14 Ar PV,5006 10013001 00 600U0905333 ophorr 0455 5100010033* Sodom DV 04 RAM AVO WOO 00 StANCADC /43 63441114 110:045 16600. NO cooDAIR 15 woad NA/ IDAISMCIIMS CO DCA l0C304 3333 19641 3333 504113010 Sckt OA% 0440 retc•010400 045045 10 MIMI All MOD I•41 1 0l6044 NO% 4.04 4CAN DO1 PCOM DI MUDD OddWit op 300315 00041 (DOWN° COMIOCAO Ova 111 AND 3401 Kat (cod) DC) AO 144493 ODUICS DOD, COAVIIIIXION Know what's below. Callbefore you dig. SITE PLAN • "" TM-1O f l 6 ' S s. d'• €' 9S 3.1 • J . (E) r0150n TRANS101114al ENLARGED SITE PLAN 11 44.50 NORTH ( .1 0.41l 1/13/11 1/13/11 7/26/11 LOSCA P11034 Woo:DINA 6041940A30 P4461 3130 040413. coo (TM-10 COWRIE SIKEI Will PIM Cr 7'0000C' 110 SCA-007 35.0435 PREPAPED • Maximize Comm. Group, Inc. ir 5 , - 11.05;. 16 9 OIII71 CLChl 1103 00 AVE 56010 755 5EKT710, 4153 88109 ADov.oroAncoslleCO 50. TM-1O 503. 1 N 0110340501 YEM[CA.A NIIWORK NOff 10 • • 141.■ 7734 1 11., Co 02590 ( 31111 IJ E NAV/11 NY 010734.5 01 VC, tu SY. 53(01 NumBEAt 8(3557033. 1 Al 3 ( Nova 32' CO8CRE1E S 2 LICJil .'OA" T ELEVATION i sh7 . 4ito,01 .49.0 r ..7.4?.."=". rEWMON 9" 00 "Ze.:11 ‘..te-,A-1Y•x 32 CONCRETE STREET lIGHT POLE .4/...4 2 itt199 ger ann. 000•WOO (9) +A.R.,. PM.. 14" .41W-a5 11.0 &Marl MO* 0:(451 0201 amycn wao _.09 r,rut, ro Lam, c451•IS 57 LOKS W ID IIMMINIEL/ "TM-10) POLE 0020u+ (03 SCA-007 2 DATE (/ 2 (/26/11 OESCR.TION oss. 99 f•PI PA'S. , Wr COW.. PeA. XS.. 42000 vRODIE ISSUC 0At6 7/26/ 00( 411 Maximize Com MI Group, luC. ROAD !CO , .:2902. CA 92882 • (909) 709-3(09 (009) 992-31 ■■•••• • NW ...V , o0 01E6 AvE StRTE 250 lt.E. wA 98109 •mwncosOr COM :E1 E a VA irs:' TM - 1 0 02000059 i.IICULA NETWORK ND ....a.WW•ca • 10E0./18 - NODE • .r..v.,---,::-.7.4.:1=.•=11=.1%—^ SOUTHEAST ELEVATION . NoirrireAsT ELEVATION ( TM-1O :01CALTE StRIXT IJEAR POE( CCI PROJECT ii0 SCA-007 } DESCR mt. A. CA . .I.TR.R2 • (909) 786-2170 ERN) 992-3 . •-SuED COP PtioeS PREPARED lit Maximize Comm. w Group, Inc. .Nr CROWN ••• aEPIER ALL E. WA SDI DS vowneePIIR corn TM- 10 SITE RAMC & P,TOIRESS. .LIULCUIA hf.1140111( 110111 IC - ....•.•emaRrarn.•RT •- , EMECtli. , CA IPST A3 3 I v PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0225, A MINOR MODIFICATION (REVISED LOCATION) TO AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NEW PATH /CROWN CASTLE TO INSTALL A NEW 40' HIGH CONCRETE STREET LIGHT POLE AS PART OF ITS WIRELESS DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEM (DAS) MASTER PLAN (NODE TM -10) IN A REVISED LOCATION IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA RIGHT -OF -WAY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CROWN HILL DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 68' NORTHWEST OF SAGE COURT Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 19, 2011, Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath /Crown Castle filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0225, a Minor Modification to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on September 21, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0225 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.10.E. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed use is consistent with all requirements stated in the Telecommunications Facility and Antenna Ordinance of the Temecula Development Code. In addition, the project is in conformance with all the requirements of the General Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the City. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect uses, buildings or structures; The antenna has been located and designed to fit on an existing utility pole or match existing street lights already located in the City right -of -way. The project is designed to have negligible impact on surrounding uses. C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; Based on the requirements stated in the Antenna Ordinance (Chapter 17.40), as well as the applicable sections of the Development Code, the site for the conditional use is adequate to accommodate required yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other features described in the Development Code. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The wireless antennas will be located in the City right -of -way and the project has been reviewed and conditioned by Public Works, Building and Safety, Fire Prevention, and the Police Department to ensure the conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community, and the proposed project is consistent with the requirements outlined in the Development Code, and Building and Fire Codes, which contain provisions to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No. PA11 -0225 a Minor Modification to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of -way: A. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on March 16, 2011 and is, therefore, exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0225, a Minor Modification to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit to locate antennas on a new concrete street light pole as part of a wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) in the City of Temecula right -of- way on the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this September 21, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 day of September 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0225 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Minor Modification (Revised Location) to an Approved Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in a revised location in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court. (Related Case PA11- 0106) Assessor's Parcel No.: City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way MSHCP Category: NA DIF Category: NA TUMF Category: NA Approval Date: September 21, 2011 Expiration Date: September 21, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Concrete Street Light Pole Gray with dark and light flecks to match existing street lights in City right -of -way Antennas and Flexwave Prisms Attached Gray /Metal /Off -White to Existing Wood Utility Poles PL -9. The applicant shall comply with their Site Justification Analysis /Statement of Operations contained on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded bythese Conditions of Approval. PL -10. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -11. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan prepared for this Project. PL -13. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours. Prior to Issuance of Building, Encroachment, or Right - of - Way Permits PL -14. The following shall be included as part of the encroachment permit: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development maytake place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -15. The maintenance /facility removal agreement, or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Planning Director. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -16. The applicant shall comply with the lighting and fixture requirements in the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of street trees. COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit CS -1. The developer shall contact the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) Maintenance Superintendent for a pre- construction meeting. Developer shall protect the landscape and irrigation equipment in place and comply with TCSD review and inspection processes. Prior to Final Approval CS -2. Any damage to existing plant or irrigation equipment shall be replaced with like kind and to the satisfaction of the TCSD Maintenance Superintendent. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditionsllnformation B -1. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings. B -2. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2007 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2007 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. At Plan Review Submittal B -4. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -5. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. FIRE PREVENTION F -1. No Comments or Conditions of Approval. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. An Encroachment Permit from the City of Temecula Public Works Department shall be required prior to start of work. A separate permit shall be required for any extensive conduit installation. PW -2. A Traffic Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Public works Department prior to start of work. PW -3. A Right -of -Way Agreement shall be executed between the Applicant and the City Council pursuant to Section 17.40.220 of the Municipal Code. PW -4. Antennas shall be installed a minimum of 75 feet from the nearest residence per Section 17.40.110 of the Municipal Code. PW -5. Each location shall be separately permitted for encroachment into the right -of -way. The number active Encroachment Permits at any given time shall be limited based on the availability of Public Works inspectors. Subsequent permits shall be issued only after satisfactory restoration and acceptance of public improvements at previously permitted locations. City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project APPLICANT: Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle LOCATION: The Project includes the installation of 39 DAS nodes within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (DAS) to provide wireless telecommunication services to multiple carriers. NewPath proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS throughout the publicly owned City right -of -way (see map on back side of this Notice). The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called "nodes." Each node consists of antenna rays constructed within or on a new slim line monopole camouflaged as a new street light, or located on an existing utility pole. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the attached Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and /or the Mitigation Monitoring Program will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project, which is available for review at City Hall. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is February 14, 2011 to March 15, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper [Posting the Site Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matthew D. Peters, AICP at (951) 694 -6408. Prepared by: '+n�h � �k550(.■ °C. (tAw -. (Signature) (Title) City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Environmental Checklist Project Title NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 Contact Person and Phone Number Matthew D. Peters, AICP (951) 694 -6408 Project Location The Project includes the installation of a 39 -node wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way, County of Riverside (see attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan for locations) Project Sponsor's Name and Address Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath c/o Crown Castle USA Maximize Communications Group, Inc. 1351 Pomona Rd., Suite 110 Corona, CA 92882 NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle USA 1100 Dexter Ave., Suite 250 Seattle, WA 98109 General Plan Designation NA (Not Applicable) — all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. NA (Not Applicable)— all antennas will be located on new street lights or existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right - of -way. Zoning Description of Project NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle is a wireless infrastructure company that designs, develops and operates fiber -fed wireless distributed antenna systems (referred to herein as "DAS ") to provide wireless telecommunication services. The proposed DAS network is a low profile system capable of delivering wireless telecommunications service to customers of multiple carriers such as AT &T, Verizon, Sprint, and MetroPCS. The proposed network initially will supply the infrastructure for NewPath's anchor tenant, MetroPCS. The network utilizes a series of small, low -power antennas called, "nodes," which receive an optical signal from a central hub and distribute the signal in the form of Radio Frequency (RF) transmissions. For this Project, the hub is outside the City's boundaries (as are three other nodes, one in the County of Riverside and two in the City of Murrieta). Within the City of Temecula, the proposed network consists only of the antenna nodes. Of the 39 nodes located in the City of Temecula right -of -way, 33 will be designed as new street lights and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 1 Each node consists either of antenna arrays constructed within or on a slim -line monopole designed to match existing street lights throughout the City right -of -way, or antenna arrays fixed to existing utility poles owned by the Joint Pole Committee ( "JPC "). Each facility generally features a 53.74 -inch Kathrein Tri- sector antenna within a flush- mounted housing (for new poles) or three Kathrein antennas mounted to existing JPC utility poles. Either configuration also will feature one or more Flex Wave Prisms or similar "fiber repeaters" mounted to either the new street light or the existing JPC utility pole. The fiber repeater converts digitalized spectrum received from the hub into RF signals emitted from the antenna array. Where the new node is proposed for an existing JPC pole, the facility also features a ground mounted meter pedestal. The Project involves the installation of both aerial fiber -optic cable on existing wood utility and newly installed street lights, and underground fiber -optic cable installed within newly installed and existing poly vinyl chloride (PVC) conduit in previously disturbed rights of way. The newly installed fiber -optic cable would connect 39 distributed antenna system nodes and ancillary optical conversion and power equipment also attached to the same utility poles within the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way. Another three will be installed outside the City limits; two in the City of Murrieta and one in the County of Riverside. The entire network will be connected to a newly installed fiber -optic base station hub. Construction of the proposed DAS Project will consist specifically of the following: • Installation by NewPath of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed as street lights; • Installation of 39 DAS nodes each containing either: one (1) tri- sector pipe antenna, three (3) antennae insiode radomes, or between three (3) and six (6) panel antennas installed on the utility pole; • Installation of fiber -optic equipment (i.e. optical conversion equipment, signal regeneration equipment, switching equipment, etc...) mounted on existing wood and newly - installed street lights; • Installation of 4 -inch Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) conduit; • Aerial installation of fiber -optic cable onto existing or new wood and street lights; • Underground installation of fiber -optic cable into existing and newly installed conduit; • Underground connection of network to one (1) hub facility to be installed inside an existing public storage facility located at 43920 Butterfield Stage Rd.; • Installation of pull boxes and hand holes; and • Splicing of fiber -optic cable into facilities. The location of the proposed Project is illustrated on the attached Crown Castle DAS Master Plan, and each location is further described on a corresponding and attached spreadsheet. Engineering drawings for a new street light and co- location on an G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 2 G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 existing utility are also attached. Construction is expected to last approximately 120 days and will consist of two (2) aerial crews and two (2) underground crews working simultaneously to complete construction of the proposed Project. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The Project proposes to develop a 39 -node DAS network throughout the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of way adjacent to various commercial and residential zones Other public agencies whose approval is required None G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Noise Population and Housing Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Public Services Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Hazards and Hazardous Materials Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the None lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. X I find that although the proposed project could have be a significant effect in this case because revisions the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE a significant effect on the environment, there will not in the project have been made by or agreed to by DECLARATION will be prepared. a significant effect on the environment, and an I find that the proposed project MAY have ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, imposed upon the proposed project, nothin• further a significant effect on the environment, because all adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to including revisions or mitigation measures that are is required. Signature Printed Name Date For fd. In, a6ll G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 4 4- Y 4-- L L L CIA OA CLO J J J 4-- 4- a) v a) Q v v v >- rn r/) r/) CL) 3 3 3 o v v a) a z z z 0 y ro 0 J cc ro 0 t 0 0 a) 0 0 u 0 L t 0 O m "O cc r0 L as 00 0 O a, uJ w 0 cc ro 0 r0 O V) 0) L 7 0 L!1 CO cc ro 0 L r0 2 4- O a) N N 0) L 7 0 rn U 0 ro E O 0 U r0 a CO r0 ro E 0 (I) N 4- a) 0 0 ro 0 0 O c E r0 V 0 N a) ro coo a L U c 00 CC 0 0 0 L 7 O rn L 0.0 00 J J Q) a) L_ 0) 4- +., N In CI) v Z z O CC CU 00 N - Cr) CU 7 m 0 W Zr) (NI Ln to 0 0 ro c U 0) E aJ F- O a) N L 7 0 CL L U CO CC > 4-- 0 0 U 0 L t 0 ro C r1) r-1 r o rl ro ro L 0 dJ 0 a) 'a N ro CL) L 0 z ci N m Lr) N Ol ri O O O O '71 m H H H H H H H N 4--0 Y 4-+ 4- L L L L L • J J J J 4-, 4--, 4-, 4--+ (1) v 0) v 0) CU 0) y+ N 4- +, 4--. rn V') CO N l/) CI) 0)) aa)) v v Z z z z z r0 O t 0 U J V 0 Ln m m .-1 >2 r0 r0 3 O m v 3 O to a) c c 3 V) J U 0 z Ln 0 r-1 ai c r0 J a) CU N w r0 0 0 3 0 -a ro 0) 2 -J V 0 T.0 ro L r0 0 CU ` 0 U w 0 CC C - o 0 0 -J 0 lh O 0 0 O r CC C O U ro ro 0 0 7 - J 0 w 1.01 >- ro ro a) - J z LO N 00 N cr 00 O O O L- 4 c-1 N H H H H H H H a) ro c c w r0 0 J 0 '.0 l0 (NI r0 0 r0 c z t 7 0 U 0) co r0 J U 0 z oo (.0 c 0 V z ro v 0 C7 0 v d J V 0 4 O r0 0 cc to 0 L U c t0 CC w CI) v 0 0 0_ 0 Q Q 0 0 00 CIO +-, 4-0 c c +., CIO 00 .L0 U 00 J J n 7) J w w a) a) 0 0 a) N L L N 0) 3 ° 0) z z ¢ ¢ z r0 0 CC 0) 00 V) V) "0 a) a) CO 4- 0 N 0 O N m r0 c 0 U 0 L U ro 4- 0 rn w (/) cc (o L ro ,ED ro 2 V 0 w 0 0 ILO CC 0) a) 0 C 4- 0 N c O 00 ro a) ro V J U O rn l0 r0' c r0 - J a) 0 r0 0 c a H H H H H H H U a, co L 0) 1— T V) E O 4- 0 U (0 0 cc O U c 0) S 0 O v) z aJ • L (0 E O J (o 0 a (o 0 cc co 0 L U c (o cc 0 N a) 0 D_ CL 00 ,., 4-+ C L -C . •� J J X 0) 4-, w 0) v O V) V) L 3 3 0 Z Z Q a co 0 cc (0 c 0 4- v 0 L) (o cc 0 V) O a N O CC (0 00 co O V) w O (../) aJ (0 E U (o -o c 0) 0 w O m a (0 O cc (0 1 (0 00 (0 Z a (0 0 (0 (o 00 (0 0 in Vt (0 O cc (0 O (0 0 0 L U co cc V) Z 4- 4., L L . • J J 4 +-, ✓ 0) 0) 0) • N 3 3 CU CU Z Z T as (0 C a) (o J 0 w l!) V) a CC T c aJ (0 a) C 0) (7 (0 U c0 (0 C a) 0 O 0 m a (D 1 (0 000 (o (7 Z CO 01 O N m (Ns N N N N Gf 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 L L G L 2 L L G H F- F- H H H L 0D 0 a) 4- V) 0) Z (f) (0 a (o O 0 (o C a 0) U 0 w O Ol T (o n3 (0 c 0) L v V) (o c 0) 0) V) J V) 0 CL no c �--I x w O L ro U a co 0 (o 4- i 0D 0 0 Z O O N a (0 (0 c v aJ V) (0 -J (17 w v 0 a a O O -o a, c O 0 0 t u_ a, 0 D_ - o O 0 rci U L O 0 co > 0 c O 0 CU a c ( a cc T CC a) V) v) a) 0 a 0 OD c X w 0 U aJ O L LD LC) 0 m 0 O O O (0 c a) 4- a) 0 (0 7 c v V) (1) 4- 00 • J v 0) v Z a O 0 a c CU 4- ro -o cc c a) co L v c v l7 V) Z L 00 0) aJ V) v Z Vf (D I■ 01 0 r-I N N N N m m m I I I I I I I L 2 ` 2 ` G L G 2 L H r L I— I H H 4- 4- _C ..0 -C L 0D 0D 00 00 J J J J 4-+ 4- +J 1 . 1 ) ( 1 ) ( 1 ) a ) a) a) a) v L L L L • 4- 4- 4- N V) V) V) cu CD CU Z Z Z Z a 0` (0 (o 00 ( (0 0 0 0 ut O La L a) 4- a) L U C V) Z 0 a) O CU N 0 W 00 '-4 a (0 0 0_' co 0 V) v) LC) n oO m m m S I s I G 2 G co 0 a) a) 0 a) V) v L U c a) O OD C O O 9 • O X 0 a. to n ▪ (o ( 1 c a) f0 E u V1 f0 \ a Z a) (0 0 m _ m (o S I L Q O O O 0 o 0 O cr ui Ln 0) 0A co O 0 X 0 O_ Q (0 C 0` -o C O 0 00 C X W c 0 N a) a) 0o (0 0 O X 0 Q O_ (0 a C 0 0D a) a c t U c a) - o a) O Q O 0 O O O cis m 1 5 s O to 0 { 11' / , ) § ! j ■ / c P 1! E | - § k 2 | 1 ® $ I | "I ( t t 20 1041 ¢` $ h • k| { k i / / ts \ \ , E 0 0 / 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: See the attached maps and exhibits included in the Project description for more information on the location and design of the DAS nodes. 1.a.b: No Impact: As indicated in the General Plan (Figure CD -1), The Project and the location of the nodes will not have an effect on a scenic vista or substantially damage any scenic resources as they are all located in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way adjacent to commercial or residential areas. 1.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The installation of aerial cable on existing poles would further add to the number of cables attached to the poles. These would be attached near phone and cable TV cables and would incrementally add to the visual impact of these structures. This additional impact would constitute a less- than - significant impact due to the presence of other cables on the poles. However, the proposed Project includes the installation of 33 new slim -line monopoles designed to match existing street lights located throughout the City right -of -way and the remaining 6 will be attached to existing utility poles. The street light design will help the antennas blend in with the surrounding environment. In some cases, street lights may not blend in a rural area where no street lights exist. In order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding area, the following mitigation is required to ensure a less than significant visual and aesthetic impact: Mitigation Measure A -1. New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street light base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 5 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X X b c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use X X d e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? X Comments: 2.a. No Impact: The project has been or would be located entirely within the existing publicly owned right - of -way along existing roadways and within generally urban and residentially developed areas. No portion of the project site or adjacent areas is considered to be Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. 2.b. No Impact: The project is located within a publicly owned right -of -way and is not zoned for agricultural use or under a Williamson Act Contract. 2.c.d.e. No Impact: The project is in a publicly owned right -of -way that is not used or zoned for agriculture, timberland or forest uses. There would be no conversion of land from forest or farmland since none exists. G: \PLANNING \2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 6 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated X X X X Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? b c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: Construction of the Project will consist of four (4) work crews (two [2] aerial crews and two [2] underground crew) who will work simultaneously until completion. Each work crew will install all described components of the Project as they progress along the Project alignment. A typical underground crew will consist of the following: 1 backhoe 1 HDD bore machine 3 standard pickup trucks 1 dump truck 2 hand -held vibratory compactors 1 saw cutter 1 crane The following labor crew will be required: 1 foreman, 2 operators, 3 laborers (including flagmen), and 1 inspector. A typical aerial cable placing crew will consist of the following equipment: 2 aerial cable - placing vehicles 1 cable reel trailer 1 supply and equipment truck 1 pickup truck A typical aerial crew will consist of an aerial cable - placing vehicle with a driver, an in- bucket operator and one or two flagmen, depending on traffic conditions. 3.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project does not include development of new homes or businesses and, therefore, would not induce population growth in the South Coast Air Basin. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 7 Emissions during construction would result in minimal emissions from occasional vehicle trips to maintain the project facilities. Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction would be less than significant through the implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM), as well as the following mitigation: Mitigation Measures Air Quality 1: • Minimize and disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. 3.e. Less Than Significant: The construction of the project could generate fumes from the operation of construction equipment and from asphalt paving, which may be considered objectionable by some people. Such exposurtes would be short term and /or transient since they would occur during the construction phase only. Furhtermore, SCAQMD rules restrict VOC content (the source of odor - causing compounds) in asphalt and paints. The project would utilize typical construction techniques in compliance with SCAQMD rules. As such, project construction would not cause an odor nuisance, and odor impacts would be less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 8 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will be constructed within the publicly owned right -of -way, which consists of primarily paved surfaces with no riparian habitat or habitat for sensitive species, wetlands, vernal pools, or marshes. No tree removal is anticipated and no migratory routes or wildlife corridors have been identified. There may be a potential for indirect impact to habitat from construction runoff or release of hazardous substances from construction. However, these potential impacts are discussed under Section 8, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, and are reduced to level that is less than significant through the implementation of an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). 4.e. -f. No Impact: The project would not result in tree removal or impacts to biological resources. The project site is not located within a habitat conservation area; therefore no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 9 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right - of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction. It is not likely that intact resources would still exist in most of the project area; however, there is a potential that resources could be present in less disturbed areas. As a result, the following standard note shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 10 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of Toss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: 6.a.i., ii., iii. Less Than Significant Impact: The Elsinore Fault traverses the City of Temecula and is located in an area of high seismic activity and faulting. In addition, the project area may be subject to severe ground shaking from a seismic event since the area also has high liquefaction potential. The project will be designed to comply with the City's seismic design standards for utilities, resulting in a Tess than significant impact. 6.a.iv. No impact: While the City of Temecula has rolling hills and areas of steep topography, the individual project sites for each node within the publicly owned right -of way are relatively flat and not prone to landslides. No impact would occur. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The erosion hazard of the soils in most of the project area is slight. In addition, much of the area in the public right -of way where the nodes will be installed include turf. Erosion controls will be used where necessary along the proposed project route. The most likely situations for the use of controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed -free straw wattles and straw bales, and other control measures as necessary. Each node will require an encroachment permit to be issued by the Department of Public Works resulting in a less than significant impact. 6.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As described above, the area is prone to liquefaction, and areas with expansive soils. The impact is considered less than significant as each node will be reviewed by the Department of Building and Safety for compliance with seismic design standards for utilities. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 11 6.e. No Impact: Septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems are not a part of the project. No impact would occur. G:\PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 12 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X Comments: 7.a.b. No Impact: The proposed Project involves the installation of new concrete street light poles and new antennas on existing utility poles in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The new and existing poles will not generate noise or greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, no impacts will occur. G:\PLANNING12010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 13 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: 8.a. -d. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activities have the potential to release three primary types of materials into the environment: petroleum based products used in construction equipment, bentonite slurry from boring operations, and runoff of silt -laden water from the construction site. To reduce the potential for release of these materials and to minimize the impacts associated with an inadvertent spill, NewPath will implement an existing Hazardous Materials Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan (SPCP). This plan will evaluate potential spoil scenarios, identify avoidance and prevention measures, and identify response actions to such situations in order to reduce the impacts to a less than significant level. 8.e. Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated: The City's GIS mapping system identifies portions of the project area as being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project is subject to review and comment by the Riverside Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The City of Temecula will require the project to be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to issuance of any permits. As previously provided for other projects in Airport Zones in the City of Temecula, the following standard mitigation measures will be required: G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 14 Mitigation Measure Haz 1: The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. 8.f. No Impact: The Project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 8.g. Less Than Significant Impact: Access along project area roadways during construction is expected to be maintained so that residents living in the vicinity are not significantly impacted by the project. Due to the temporary nature of the project and the City's requirement for a Traffic Control Plan, the impacts would be less than significant. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The project area is within an urbanized area and is not prone to wildfires. The impact is less than significant. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 15 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? Y. X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project- specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X • Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: Erosion controls as required by the City's Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be used where necessary along the proposed Project route. The most likely situation for use of these controls will be when construction activities occur near storm drains and in landscaped areas where the slope of hillsides is steep. Examples of control measures that may be used include silt fence, certified weed - free straw wattles an straw bales, and other control measures as necessary resulting in a less than significant impact. 9.b. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new street light poles and antennas in the public right -of -way. Groundwater will not be impacted. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 16 9.c.d. No Impact: The project would involve minor construction within the publicly owned right -of -way. The project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding. No alteration of the course of a stream or river would occur and no impact would occur. 9.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not be adding a significant amount of impervious area to the project area, since such facilities consist of a vertical pole and are constructed adjacent to previously paved areas. 9.f. No Impact: The project would not require the preparation of a WQMP. Thus, no impacts would occur. 9.g. No Impact: The project does not involve placement of housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map, because the project does not include any residential within those zones. No impact would occur. 9.h. No Impact: Any structures proposed to be placed within a 100 -year flood zone will be small and limited to poles, aboveground aerial cables, and underground cables. These will not impede or redirect flows. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 9.i. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, since this is a utility project in the City of Temecula publicly owned right -of -way. The impact is considered less than significant. 9.j. No Impact: No portion of the project is subjected to seiche, tsunami or mudlfow. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 17 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X X b c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 10.a. No Impact: Installation of the DAS Network entirely within the City owned public right -of -way will not divide an established community. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project has been reviewed by the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) for consistency with all applicable plans, policies and regulations, including the City's Telecommunications Ordinance, to ensure the project will have a less than significant impact. 10.c. No Impact: None of the Project components are located on lands covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 18 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X Comments: 11.a.b. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the zoning classification of MRZ -3a has been applied by the State. MRZ -3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, these areas are not considered to contain deposits of significant economic value, based on available data. In addition, the proposed project is to be constructed in the publicly owned right -of -way, which has been previously disturbed by grading, roadway, and sidewalk construction that will not impact any mineral resources. Thus, no impact will occur. G:\PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 19 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X No Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: 12.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed Project will increase noise levels only during construction, and only between the hours of 6:30 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday (No Sundays) as required by City Ordinance 9.20.060.D. No increase in noise levels will occur from the operational phase of the Project because noise- producing equipment will not be part of the Project. The noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to occur in the immediate vicinity of construction equipment. The increased noise levels will occur during mostly daylight hours, when average noise levels from vehicular traffic are generally the highest. In addition, the noise increase will not affect any one location for an extended period of time. The noise generated from construction activities would be short term in duration and considered Tess than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Construction activity associated with the proposed project would not result in excessive ground -borne noise or perceptive vibration. Removal of pavement and drilling for new poles would create short term, low levels of ground -borne noise and vibrations. No high vibration producing activities such as pile driving, are proposed. Once construction is complete, the proposed project is not expected to generate vibration or noise. Therefore, impacts associated with construction- related noise and vibrations are considered less than significant. 12.c. No Impact: Once constructed, the DAS system does not produce noise, and therefore, would create no permanent increase in ambient noise levels. Therefore, no impact would occur. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in response (a) above, there would be a short term increase in noise levels during construction; however, due to the short duration and locations, the impacts are considered Tess than significant. G: \PLANNING\2010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 20 12.e. Less Than Significant Impact: This is not a residential or commercial development Project and the nodes are not staffed. Thus, the Project will not result in residents or employees being subjected to airport noise. No impacts will occur. 12.f. No Impact: The project is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: \PLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 21 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 13.a. No Impact: The proposed project would not result in substantial population growth in the area because no new homes or businesses are proposed, and no infrastructure related to population growth is proposed. Therefore, no impacts would occur. 13.b. No Impact: No housing would be displaced by the proposed project and no impact would occur. 13.c. No Impact: The project would not displace people or housing, or require replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur. G: PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 22 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: 14.a. No Impact: The project involves the installation of new concrete steel light poles or co- location of antenna facilities on an existing pole in the city owned public right -of -way. The project will not introduce any new fire hazards or generate population growth that would require an increase in fire or police protection services. The project would not result in an increase of population or housing in the project area. Therefore no new demand on local schools, parks or public facilities would occur. G: \PLANNING120101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 23 15. RECREATION. Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 15.a. No Impact: The project would not result in an increase of population, which would increase the use of existing parks or other recreation facilities. Therefore. No impacts would occur. 15.b. No Impact: The proposed project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreation facilities. Therefore, no impacts would occur. G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 24 16. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X X e Result in inadequate emergency access? f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: 16.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project would be constructed over time along roadways in the City of Temecula, ranging from major roadways to residential streets. It is expected that there will be short-term construction related impacts associated with the project. As a result, the Department of Public Works will require an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement to address the impacts and reduce them to a level of less than significant impact. 16.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Due to the low number of construction vehicles associated with two aerial crews and two underground work crews required by the proposed project, no changes in the level of service are anticipated. As mentioned above, short-term construction related impacts will be reduce to a level of Tess than significant through Public Works requirements for an encroachment permit, traffic control plan, and right -of way agreement. 16.c. No Impact: Construction and operational traffic associated with the proposed project is not expected to result in a change in air traffic patterns, including an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks given that the new steel light poles will be less than 40 feet high or the new antennas will be co- located on existing utility poles in the city owned public right -of -way. _16.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project would result in trenching and laying of conduit, construction of new light poles, and aerial and underground installation of fiber optic cable, and installation of pull boxes and hand holes. This would result in potential lane closures, loss of access, and short-term traffic congestion. G:\PLANNING\20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 25 Again, the City will require an encroachment permit and traffic control plan to reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant. 16.e.f. No Impact: The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed project and have determined that that there will be no significant impacts to emergency access. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies or programs regarding public transit, bicycle or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. G: \PLANNING12010\PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 26 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 17.a. No Impact: The project is within the publicly owned right -of -way in developed areas within the City of Temecula, which includes streets, curb, gutter, storm drain, sewer drain, and existing utility lines, such as power lines, telephone lines and cable television lines. The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment, and thus would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.b. No Impact: The project would not require or result in the expansion or construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.c. No Impact: During the construction of the proposed project, all ground disturbances would be limited to the previously developed, and publicly owned right -of way. To avoid impacts to the existing stormwater system, the applicant is planning to tunnel or bore under existing curbs and gutters where the project proposes to install underground fiber optic communication lines. Therefore, the project would not require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, and no impacts would occur. 17.d.e. No Impact: The project would not generate a demand for water or wastewater treatment. Therefore, the project would not cause a violation in wastewater treatment requirements, or require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities. Therefore, no impact would occur. 17.f.g No Impact: The project will generate a minimal amount of solid waste during construction. The project will include a condition of approval requiring the developer to contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 27 construction debris. The amount of solid waste generated by the project would not be substantial or interfere with the sufficient permitted capacity of nearby landfills and there would be no impact. G:IPLANNING \20101PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning\Planning Commission\CEQA Initial Study.doc 28 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact X X No Impact a Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? b c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact: As discussed in the sections above, the project would involve the construction of a utility system and would not significantly impact fish or wildlife resources, nor impact rare, threatened or endangered species. The proposed project with the inclusion of standard conditions of approval and permitting process would not significantly impact cultural or biological resources. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the implementation of the proposed project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified. G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 29 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 19 a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System Map Sets were used as referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The Geographic Information System Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19 b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19 c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. SOURCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Development Code 5. Supplemental Information provided by NewPath c/o Crown Castle as required by the City's Telecommunication Ordinance and Conditional Use Permit applications G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP\Planning \Planning Commission \CEQA Initial Study.doc 30 Mitigation Monitoring Program NewPath c/o Crown Castle Wireless Distributed Antenna System (DAS) Project AESTHETICS General Impact: Mitigation Measures Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: AIR QUALITY General Impact: Mitigation Measures: Potentially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings New slim -line monopoles should be designed as a concrete street light pole to match existing street lights in the right -of -way. If a new street light is determined to have a negative visual and aesthetic impact, a slim -line monopole with concrete street Tight base — minus the "cobra" light arm may be acceptable. In rural areas, where street lights don't exist a new wood pole may be considered acceptable. Thus, three types of new poles may be acceptable depending on the surrounding environment: 1. New concrete street light with appropriate light arms or globe 2. New concrete "street light" type pole minus the light arm 3. New wood pole if there are no surrounding street lights Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the planning application review and plan check process. Prior to issuance of a building permit Planning Department Short -term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction Implementation of dust abatement procedures in accordance with SCAQMD rules Best Available Control measures (BACM) • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gust exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion G: \PLANNING\2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Responsible Monitoring Party: HAZARDS General Impact: Mitigation Measure: Specific Process: Mitigation Milestone: Planning staff will mitigation measure review and grading process. Prior to issuance construction Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Department • Stabilize the surface dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials. verify compliance with the above as part of the planning application plan /encroachment permit plan check of associated permits and during Planning and Public Works Departments Directly or indirectly exposing people or structures to potential adverse effects from being located within the French Valley Airport Influence Area. The project shall be reviewed and conditioned by ALUC prior to the issuance of any grading or building permits. Planning staff will verify compliance with the above mitigation measure as part of the building and grading plan check review process. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit G: \PLANNING \2010 \PA10 -0186 NewPath Networks TM -01 CUP \Planning \Planning Commission \MMP Mitigation Monitoring Program.doc Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA11 -0225 Maximize Communications Group on behalf of NewPath Networks c/o Crown Castle A Minor Modification (revised location) to an Approved Conditional Use Permit for New Path /Crown Castle to install a new 40' high concrete street light pole as part of its wireless distributed antenna system (DAS) Master Plan (Node TM -10) in a revised location in the City of Temecula right -of -way on the north side of Crown Hill Drive, approximately 68' northwest of Sage Court. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration and is exempt from further environmental review (CEQA Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Matt Peters, (951) 694 -6408 City of Temecula, Council Chambers September 21, 2011 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Total Floor Area /Ratio: N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: N/A Parking Required /Provided: N/A STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 21, 2011 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA11 -0175, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47, located at 26700 Ynez Road Approve with Conditions Categorically Exempt Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities Jeanette Carvajal on behalf of Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz Community Commercial (CC) Community Commercial (CC) Site: Existing Restaurant/Community Commercial (CC) North: Existing Automotive Dealership /Service Commercial (SC) South: Existing Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) East: Existing Parking Lot and Commercial Structure /Community Commercial (CC) West: Ynez Road, Existing Automotive Dealership /Service Commercial (SC) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 0.72 N/A N/A N/A N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY On June 27, 2011, Jeanette Carvajal, on behalf of Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz, submitted Planning Application No. PA11 -0175. The application will allow the restaurant to obtain a Type 47 Alcohol License from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz is an existing restaurant located within an area zoned Community Commercial (CC). The restaurant intends to upgrade their Type 41 License from ABC to a Type 47 (On -Sale General Eating Place). The license will allow for the sale and consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Table 17.08.030), alcoholic beverage sales at restaurants, excluding beer and wine, require the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. ABC will process findings of Public Convenience or Necessity upon approval of the Minor Conditional Use Permit. No changes to the restaurant's existing operations are proposed as part of the Conditional Use Permit application. In addition, no changes are proposed to the structure or site as part of the application. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on September 8, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within a 1500 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities). The application will allow an existing restaurant to upgrade their liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47. The upgraded license will allow for the consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits. No changes are proposed for the existing structure, site plan, or overall restaurant operations. FINDINGS The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The use will allow an existing restaurant to upgrade its liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47. No operational changes to the restaurant are proposed. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Table 17.08.030), alcoholic beverage sales at restaurants, excluding beer and wine, require the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The application will allow for the upgrade of an existing liquor license. Restaurants commonly pursue Type 47 Licenses from ABC as a way to offer their customers a wider selection of beverage choices, No operational changes have been proposed as part of the application. Therefore, the use will be compatible with the nature, condition and development of the adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The application will allow for the upgrade of an existing liquor license. No operational changes or physical changes to the site have been proposed, Therefore, the site will remain adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. The project meets all requirements of Development Code which provides safeguards for the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. That the decision to conditionally approve or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal. The decision to conditionally approve the application for the conditional use will be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing 7 v "� 4444 : 1to":I : 1L iii Asa 1•.,n • •...m.......,.• • M owl. 40 manna wxonnt M.r. tore t••I r. tr 40 moan =matt w woos r. v•r n• Kr. tow 41>OO•010 WOW* Pat. OW r• a• .Owamn mo o. wan v1n I 0•7 n1.12•a O weets t.au M. tore .•w tan 11 wu 40w911e WOAD V. L v D KEY TO THIS SHEET 0 man wawa.. n..wr Q. rams wonw uo t•O• e K. a owaK K1.10 4.44 Mfg. o ....n ft. AM o,1.t1, Ita.r.1 0 �..Iw.1. 0 OP... ICI aw O. .044:4 I' WK. Yt1Ma.. t O M tI 41 O " =.w.•..K.....Y,® IOW..; a 1 1 p M,.• Y.,JYIKInt 0 wan awl... Iww) ® ts1A 4[6.0nl41, w .M 0 M n 1i p nt.n 'r a , Nolo MO..n.Ms. (11. -- 4444 -. -- IA*44.1Kw, Mai aMat tes... • OM WM... n1• ni•Of MSC OW v MIMI. a4(14, te ,,,,.�K� a� 1,1.44 . _ M. 4.4.. 44. ..1 44 MI4, .44 MC V .w.t I41) v.•W 4.6,14,, n, 14441 Pas .pK .w tanw.w saw KO, w. w. nl Or ON OVI ��.of .11,r . • MOW 44.DKa,K.. 1.;1e60 • • 441 L.r. 4 MI 40. n. .0 .14 . M. KMM. A . 1 . MI woo. •. • 14.446 . r I ..R.4. AMC/ IV sad/ IS .._..Y. M t.1, I..11.1K _ .Ka NK...11... _1•a. SZECATAbZi L•I� >7DI T11l A d • e4i ti.L7 Ng �J.DIL r- .,16wasT _ _ - • I.k IRMVI .•Mkt t» .01 .33 11 1b 17 • 10 MUM PIN AAIAM MI al 1« WOOS ONI•MILI 46 IOW . am UM lM9M� MCISIAY•t. A.q N W .d • NW M } mlrren.r a•. Man L..a A.. .6 anal f'Y13I,'q® r- -r 0+•133 -r o(rF; sc;iTEWar FiN'I:S SC LO 1kA � .u•1 w•1 •1m d 11/t••l• 103 AWL 3 �i6CL7�0 • • 14 irMi Y.It I. w.w 1 ▪ � + M a y w O man MOO tI �p� • Mr. M• :.L. MINIM W. ~ Oe � M.O 11”.¢. { M ;Y M.Y . .. i 0•0.10 I1.•k*10 •-at, ru wtr`.xl • �iirlr a�.+wiv TIM) 114 w I. I.16•• W... 1. t. sw. wk aMrw « u U..Mra .lm . mw 6/1 ▪ 7■161 iswr • ii. lu g rw.oy uU SUM V. w N I.. 1µ R.1•.i Mw ie.I..al t T10.1 M.X....AM. I11.R.MO... 11 Mr YM.I.Fr MI5 ..1.[•.1 Y I.NL rN O WY q! . M. ...VW n . 1011.i m1.lYY. I Of& 077•111 7041 .111 U rut 0 r1414M1 II. MG UM •wt • WWI w *OM 01 •. •m J000 utut •4 00 433 !1 •033 ta Lp T -0 1L' WINK CO M N1DM K HI TYPE THEW EuWING 1lfr.. *3 l.• _ — • w. PM N - t1re..10 IOU M. • .M 111M... M'rd ti M. • r-rrrr .e. r a.ilmm - -- NMI A I • Mw • ..0 1111 rMirr ®e .... 33• rtr •e •1 r+Y•r 1111 a110. 1 • MI•M• .m/1y MY•tM. � • � • K M. tl l l il/• � unLl Yll. Mkt Mz i( GR —��— •_1111____.___._ MAW SCALE . 1' =6'-0• PC RESOLUTION NO. 11- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0175, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE EXISTING FISH HOUSE VERA CRUZ LOCATED AT 26700 YNEZ ROAD TO UPGRADE THEIR EXISTING LIQUOR LICENSE FROM A TYPE 41 TO A TYPE 47 (APN 921 -750 -001) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 27, 2011, Jeanette Carvajal, on behalf of Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz, filed Planning Application No. PA11 -0175, a Conditional Use Permit Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on September 21, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0175 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Conditional Use Permit, Development Code Section 17.04.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The use will allow an existing restaurant to upgrade its liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47. No operational changes to the restaurant are proposed. Per the City of Temecula Development Code (Table 17.08.030), alcoholic beverage sales at restaurants, excluding beer and wine, require the approval of a Minor Conditional Use Permit. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures; The application will allow for the upgrade of an existing liquor license. Restaurants commonly pursue Type 47 Licenses from ABC as a way to offer their customers a wider selection of beverage choices. No operational changes have been proposed as part of the application. Therefore, the use will be compatible with the nature, condition and development of the adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood; The application will allow for the upgrade of an existing liquor license. No operational changes or physical changes to the site have been proposed. Therefore, the site will remain adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Development Code and required by the Planning Commission or City Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The project meets all requirements of Development Code which provides safeguards for the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to be detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. E. That the decision to conditionally approve or deny the application for a Conditional Use Permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City Council on appeal; The decision to conditionally approve the application for the conditional use is based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Conditional Use Permit Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities) The application will allow an existing restaurant to upgrade their liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47. The upgraded license will allow for the consumption of beer, wine, and distilled spirits. No changes are proposed for the existing structure, site plan, or overall restaurant operations. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0175, a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Fish House Vera Cruz located at 26700 Ynez Road to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21 day of September, 2011. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA )ss Pat Kight, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21 day of September 2011, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0175 Project Description: Assessor's Parcel No.: 921 - 750 -001 MSHCP Category: Exempt (No New Square Footage /Grading) DIF Category: Exempt (No New Square Footage) TUMF Category: Exempt (No New Square Footage) Approval Date: September 21, 2011 Expiration Date: September 21, 2013 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. General Requirements EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Fish House Vera Cruz to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47, located at 26700 Ynez Road The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations submitted June 27, 2011, on file with the Planning Department, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -8. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. PL -9. The City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council retain and reserve the right and jurisdiction to review and modify this Conditional Use Permit (including the Conditions of Approval) based on changed circumstances. Changed circumstances include, but are not limited to, the modification of business, a change in scope, emphasis, size of nature of the business, and the expansion, alteration, reconfiguration or change of use. The reservation of right to review any Conditional Use Permit granted or approved or conditionally approved hereunder by the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission and City Council is in addition to, and not in- lieu of, the right of the City, its Planning Director, Planning Commission, and City Council to review, revoke or modify any Conditional Use Permit approved or conditionally approved hereunder for any violations of the conditions imposed on such Conditional Use Permit or for the maintenance of any nuisance condition or other code violation thereon. PL -10. Prior to an employee selling alcohol from this facility, the alcohol licensee or employer for the facility shall ensure that the employee has received Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (L.E.A.D.) training from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. PL -11. An 8.5" x 11" (or larger) sign listing local transportation service providers and corresponding telephone numbers shall be posted at a conspicuous location within the building. Information to assist in the compilation of this sign may be obtained through the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce (951- 676 - 5090). OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -12. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth by the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's letter dated June 29, 2011. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant has a Type 41 license and is requesting an upgrade for a Type 47 On -Sale, General — Eating Place (Restaurant) which authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the licensed premises and authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the licensed premises. Applicant must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Minors are allowed on the premises. PD -2. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -3. Applicant must complete a LEAD training either given by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, or an ABC certified equivalent course. PD -4. Applicant shall ensure that no alcohol is sold to or consumed by any person under the age of 21. PD -5. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card ( active /reserve /retired /dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency. PD -6. As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with Section 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B &P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of the business owner and any person who serves or sells alcohol to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. PD -7. Sections 24200.5 (b) and 25657 (a) (b) B &P; Rule 143 CCR: Section 303 (a) (PC): On- sale licensees may not: (a) employ hosts, hostesses, or entertainers who solicit others to buythem drinks, alcoholic or non - alcoholic; (b) pay or agree to pay such an employee a percentage of the receipts from the sales of drinks solicited; (c) permit any person whether an employee or not, to loiter for the purpose of soliciting an alcoholic drink. PD -8. Type 41, 47 and 49 licensees must operate and maintain their licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. They must make actual and substantial sale of meals, during the normal meal hours that they are open, at least five days a week. Normal meal hours are: breakfast 6:00 a.m. — 9:00 a.m., lunch 11:00 a.m. — 2:00 p.m., and dinner 6:00 p.m. — 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. The premises must be equipped and maintained in good faith. This means the premises must possess working refrigeration and cooking devices, pots, pans, utensils, table service, condiment dispensers, menus, posters, signs, and enough goods to make substantial meals. The premises must comply with all regulations of the local health department. Incidental, sporadic or infrequent sales of meals or a mere offering of meals without actual sales is not compliance. "Meals" means the usual assortment of food commonly ordered at various hours of the day. The service of only sandwiches or salads is not considered compliance. However, certain specialty entrees, such as pizza, fish or ribs, and an assortment of other foods, such as soups, salads or desserts, may be considered a meal. The Department will presume that a licensee is operating as a bona fide eating place if the gross sales of food prepared and sold to guests on the premises exceeds the gross sales of alcoholic beverages. "Prepared" means any processing preliminary to the final serving of food. (Note: Some licensees have a "conditional" license that requires food sales to be 50% or more of the total gross sales Sections 23038 and 23787 B &P). PD -9. Licensees may not sell, give, or deliver alcohol (bythe drink or bythe package) between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day. No person may knowingly purchase alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. (Section 25631 B &P Code). Licensees may not permit patrons or employees to consume alcohol between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. of the same day (even if someone bought the drinks before 2:00 a.m. Section 25632 B &P). Some ABC licenses have special conditions (restrictions) as to hours of sale that are stricter that the law. Those licenses are marked "Conditional" (23805 B &P). PD -10. Police officers, sheriff's deputies and ABC investigators are sworn law enforcement officers (peace officers) with powers of arrest. Whether in plainclothes or uniform, peace officers have the legal right to visit and inspect any licensed premises at anytime during business hours without a search warrant or probable cause. This includes inspecting the bar and back bar, store room, office, closed or locked cabinets, safes, kitchen, or any other area within the licensed premises. It is legal and reasonable for licensees to exclude the public from some areas of the premises. However, licensees cannot and must not deny entry to, resist, delay, obstruct, or assault a peace officer (Sections 25616, 25753, and 25755 B &P; 148 and 241 (b) PC). PD -11. Licensees may not permit their licensed premises to become a disorderly house. A disorderly house is a licensed outlet (on or off sale) that: (a) disturbs neighbors with noise, loud music, loitering, littering, vandalism, urination or defecation, graffiti, etc; and /or (b) has many ongoing crimes inside such as drunks, fights, assaults, prostitution narcotics, etc. The licensed premises area includes the parking lot ( Sections 24200 (a) (B &P) and 25601 B &P; 316 PC). PD -12. Applicant shall ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages are trained in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free training for all employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new employees. Contact the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5131. PD -13. On -sale licensees who offer entertainment must abide by the following rules: (1) no licensee shall permit any person to perform acts of or acts which simulate; (a) sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation or any sexual acts which are prohibited by law, (b) the touching, caressing or fondling on the breast, buttocks, anus or genitals, (c) the displaying of the pubic hair, anus, vulva or genitals; and, (2) Subject to the provisions of subdivision (1) hereof, entertainers whose breasts and /or buttocks are exposed to view shall perform only upon a stage at least 18 inches above the immediate floor level and removed at least six feet from the nearest patron. No licensee shall permit any person to remain in or upon the licensed premises who exposes to public view any portion of his or her genitals or anus (Rule 143.3 CCR. Also violates sections 311.6 PC if conduct is `obscene," e.g. intercourse, sodomy masturbation, etc.). PD -14. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5131. LJ COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE • HEALTH SERVICES AGENCY DEPART OF EN VIRON M ENTA L HEA AgelAgt City of Temecula Planning Department c/o Eric Jones PO BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 29 June 2011 RE: PA11 -0175 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA11- 0175 for the Minor Conditional Permit to allow the existing Temecula Fish House to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47 and we have no objections. The Temecula Fish House is located at 26700 Ynez Road, under the applicant: Temecula Fish House. The restaurant building is located on this Assessor's Parcel Number (921- 750 -001) and is connected to a potable water line and sanitary sewer from an approved purveyor. Any upgraded food equipment for the restaurant use of the building shall require REHS inspector compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. If your have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.955.8980 Sincerely, Gregor Dellenbach, REHS EHS 110650 Land Use and Water Engineering • Ec,5 12(ih r _ ^side. 05 , 1 !.:206 • :9(9;9 953 -595! • `4X •909 955-s962 • 5080 1 Amc r Street 2n5 Fin . diver:de 05 92501 C:\Program Fi les\Neevi a. Com\Docu m ent Converterltemp11015682.doc Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below Case No: PA11 -0175 Applicant: Jeanette Carvajal, on behalf of Temecula Fish House Vera Cruz Proposal: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow the existing Fish House Vera Cruz to upgrade their existing liquor license from a Type 41 to a Type 47, located at 26700 Ynez Road Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities) Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: September 21, 2011 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner. DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: North: South: East: West: Lot Area: Total Floor Area /Ratio: Landscape Area /Coverage: Parking Required /Provided: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION September 21 2011 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA11 -0033, a Major Modification Application to allow the Vail Ranch Headquarters to create a phasing plan and make project revisions consisting of landscape and building modifications, located approximately 900 feet southeast of the Redhawk Parkway and Wolf Store Road intersection Approve with Conditions Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development Gerald Tessier, on behalf of Arteco Partners Corp. Highway Tourist (HT) Vail Ranch Specific Plan (Historical Commercial) Site: Existing Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex /Highway Tourist (HT) Existing Parking Lot/Highway Tourist (HT) Existing Retail Shops /Highway Tourist (HT) Temecula Creek Flood Channel /Open Space (OS) Existing Retail Shops /Highway Tourist (HT) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 3.99 Acres 27,128 sq. ft. /0.16 39,975 sq. ft. 189 spaces (existing) 0.46 Acres 52,243 sq. ft. /0.30 (allowable) 34,828 sq. ft. /20% (required) 189 spaces (required) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On May 7, 2008, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA07 -0239, a Development Plan to allow for the restoration of the Vail Ranch Headquarters. On January 24, 2011, Jerry Tessier, on behalf of Arteco Partners, submitted Planning Application No. PA11- 0033, a Major Modification Application to allow the Vail Ranch Headquarters to create a phasing plan and make site revisions. The phasing plan and modifications are needed due to the current economic climate. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The site plan meets the minimum requirements of the development standards for the land use designation of Highway Tourist (HT). Its building lot coverage of 15.6 percent is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 30 percent. In addition, the proposed landscaping /open space coverage of 56.6 percent exceeds the minimum 30 percent for the HT zone. The project was originally designed to include various elements to enhance and recreate the history of Vail Ranch. The modification and phasing plan will keep these elements intact. These items include a clear definition of the old Southern Emigrant Trail (the Butterfield Stage Path), open areas for outdoor events and dining, a story telling area, wooden benches, a water tower, windmill, hay wagon stage and various pedestrian pathways. The site will provide a monument to represent the specific segment of the Southern Emigrant Trail at the Vail Ranch Headquarters. In addition, smaller monuments with plaques will be located outside each of the historic buildings to provide the history of each structure. The perimeter of the site will be outlined with a wooden three -rail split fence (stained to match the wooden trim of the Redhawk Town Center surroundings). Two ranch gateways will enhance the front and rear of the project site consistent with the western ranch theme. The front sidewalk will be expanded to ten feet wide and will also incorporate two ornamental emblems /motifs (similar to the emblem/motifs found in the sidewalk at the four corners of Old Town Front Street and Main Street) to enhance the main front entryways to the project site. In addition, two garden benches made of local granite block -style veneer with a wooden trellis and climbing vines will add seating and decor to the front sidewalk. Phasing Plan All of the items originally approved by the Planning Commission on May 7, 2008 will be constructed. However, a two- phased approach is now proposed. Phase One Structures • Restore all historic structures and placement of building specific historic plaques • Wolf Store vent modification • Water tower construction • Emigrant trail monument signage and trail restoration • North entrance gateway 2 Phase One Site Plan Items • Install wood split -rail fencing around restaurant patios • Construct western trash enclosure • Construct hay wagon stage • Develop north east storytelling area • Landscaping • Creation of open areas, pedestrian pathways including sidewalk widening • Garden benches Phase Two Structures • Construction of a new 7,765 square foot retail structure • Addition to the existing barn Phase Two Site Plan Items • Wood three -rail split fencing around site perimeter • East end trash enclosure • Two wood trellises and bus stop benches • Windmill • Two sidewalk emblems • Southern gateway entrance • Outdoor patios will be of decomposed granite and not wood decking • Lanscaping and improvements south of the rear Fire Lane • Speed bumps at either end of the Fire Lane Architecture The Vail Ranch Restoration Association ( "VaRRA ") is a non - profit corporation formed to heighten awareness of the heritage of the historic Vail Ranch. This organization has requested that the proposed roof vents originally approved for the Wolf Store be reduced in size. The smaller size will help ensure the historic character of the structure is maintained. The originally approved scope of work for the Wolf Store consisted of the repair and repaint of all restorable materials. This work will be completed during phase one. The applicant has also requested that several items be reviewed and approved within 120 days of building permit issuance. These items include the historical monument, water tower, windmill, historic building information plaques and design of security plans. The applicant has stated that this will allow more time to work with artists, designers, and historical consultants. Staff has agreed to this request. However, the applicant has also agreed that final approval for the historical items will be granted upon review by the Director of Planning and Redevelopment. A Condition of Approval has been provided to address this issue. Furthermore, these items will be constructed and /or implemented before a Certificate of Occupancy is granted. 3 Landscaping The overall turf used for the project has been greatly reduced for the modification. The areas that formally consisted of turf have been redesigned to include decomposed granite (DG) instead. The DG will create a historically accurate feel to the project and will lower the amount of water consumed onsite. However, turf has been added to the project area that will house the proposed retail structure after its construction in phase two. This structure will now be constructed in phase two. The proposed turf for this area is Aloha Sea Shore Paspalum. This species uses up to 50% less water than cool season turf grasses. The irrigation plan has also been modified in an effort to lesson water use for the project. For example, the irrigation has been modified to utilize inline drip and bubbler systems throughout a majority of the of the project area. The irrigation modifications and the reduction in overall turf will increase the project's level of water efficiency. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on September 8, 2011 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as In -fill Development meeting the conditions described below: The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The modification for the restoration plans of Vail Ranch Headquarters is consistent with the Highway Tourist land use designation, The General Plan Highway Tourist designation includes retail, office and restaurant uses. The project is consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and with all applicable zoning designation regulations and standards contained within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code including the development standards within the Highway Tourist zoning district and all applicable requirements for lot coverage, building setbacks, floor area ratio, landscape requirements and parking requirements for projects in the Highway Tourist zone. The proposed project occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The proposed project for restoration of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters occurs within City limits. The project site is four acres and completely surrounded by urban uses. All surrounding uses are urban uses including commercial uses. 4 The project site has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site is not known to have value or habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project houses six existing historic structures and the property has been utilized from time to time for special events. The project is in compliance with the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In addition, a Burrowing Owl Survey was conducted on November 16, 2007 and it was reported that the site is not conducive to burrowing owl occupation. The site is surrounded by commercial and urban development and has no value for endangered, rare or threatened species. The approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The approval of this modification is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The preservation of the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters was planned for restoration while the surrounding development of the Redhawk Towne Center occurred. In addition, the Redhawk Towne Center includes parking to more than adequately provide parking spaces for the Historic complex. The City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the size of the project is insignificant as compared to the existing volumes on Temecula Parkway. Furthermore, it is not expected that noise, air quality or water quality will be impacted with the restoration of the historical Vail Ranch Headquarters Complex. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site for the historic Vail Ranch Headquarters can be served by all required utilities and public services as proposed. The appropriate utility services already provide service to the adjacent retail structures and development within the Redhawk Towne Center. The proposed reconstructed site has been adequately designed to ensure that all public services will access the site for all necessary services during reconstruction and build -out. FINDINGS Modifications to an approved Development Plan (Section 17.05.030) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed application will allow for a phasing schedule and modifications to the originally approved project. The proposal remains consistent with the Highway Tourist development standards of the Development Code and Highway Tourist land use designation and policies reflected for the City of Temecula General Plan. All development standards and general policies have been reviewed and the project, as conditioned, is consistent with the use regulations outlined within the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the Development Code and also complies with all applicable Building, Fire and City Municipal Codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed modification is consistent with the development standards outlined in the Vail Ranch Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project has been reviewed utilizing Vail Ranch Specific Plan Design 5 Guidelines and the Highway Tourist development standards in the Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in regard to circulation, architectural design, and site plan design. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing 6 0 125 250 Feet try O ■ Oi , • :r. ic=xixic ":7 iro#, tiumeingi A ' AI/ = /v) • , iinategagn& .111. BEIEWItefia Ikaamimui OM ./...lerAwnum ORIM sitt *W. Ego IZSa 64.414:116 c=3 EMI VLIM44.164.,Pa .12 arAireat: n‘.1"...•04 ' IN " I .4.2.1..■"•-■.', Mit ...116.1.not 14111.4 MVO AG Jo hn A.11 Cup A,....•, t. IONYAI.te.C..00 P".....11•064011 1.I MA WW1/ ladoAA151.1 .1•11 VAL RANCH HEADQUARTERS MIR. 4 1 •. ,...LOA ef,,,•• t O IH new NV/A.4O3/ IM WA pNCt 12.4.4 VI SWAM IOM lJ't 1 TANNIFOSIMAN 10 MKS r if - � � I I I L I I._.± G. I - .— noparam IELSAAACKINC PREPLAN A i rte^ I i t 610 L•'] O .,rna.ea r IVY Met ti s Oi ` 1.W"�.iY 2 JAG John Ash Yn 14ad.q. W M Mahe PM 03.00 PM 0.6 M SLIPM U rat r Iraiw«u rat POnnuw MMMII VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS TfQ14G AMP 4 M 1Jf__ I9k-.M.emlMlti SITE PLAN Pha St z A1.1 Ow Ilansmasamaiskt. 1 M a..Y. 099004 pus...Wald LP MN pil . imilLur 1 „,--..„-- �I 1 IH !!! I ! I 1II : !nI _ I ! I II P , 111111!111111 I III ! m - Ma I f 0 �' .1. 11 ill ►�`i Hi IIIII ENE in i MN 111 MEIN 111 111i■ 11113: 1 ° o �qI I _ 1 :• man .1A. .-:..� Fl�L IJIII 1 -,-.-1 ID II jI /Ia �>♦l% %i1Y ' 1 . Y rA I ` I e 1'-' r w.M.V...xu.M P.19.0..... ......a. la NIm...4•I.wMq a A' w. ..VX.avW...Y..Y .V. MR4Y.r N ∎t..O. . 1... i.'s% Iryry. ...a..MV.a.. ..?M a..41.`vM NW. .ipVaM.6�Y4..MYY.' =MUM A na.. m. i,+ r+. ..v.w ."' ..1.i.w ,...w.re...I....0 WOLF STORE- ROOF PLAN I— =�- WOLF STORE- FIRST FLOOR PLAN . i 1 I a .1 . he ! k1A . ..a Iv,InaN.G JAG 1,ou II•IU. a. (Na. fA45141 On...125 fat WI .loll, M..k . a s VAIL NANCI1 HEADG'JARTERS es VAY ,x 00.4700.1n1. WOLF STORE - FIRST FLOORS, ROOF PLAN 1 -A2.1 I 1 1 VIII t I url 1 1.111 1 1 1 It III IIII IUl • 11 I 1 I I 1 111r1 n t i l 11 r n I IY I 1 I tll I it��ul �Nlll � Istr 1i�111 �� {�i, ' �1 p 11 lIlI Il lili111 :t1 I Ll i1� 11tH /'ll�ilr i { u II 1 nuli ni'ofn l 1,i'fi' irri ' iir� u�'iWiiS�{�1111111 IIIIIIlrrIIII'IIIIII��l III II I111 WOLF STORE -NORTH ELEVATION • 00.11111=1111..1.3 *WM WOLF STORE -EAST ELEVATION ILgU1 11111 1 111 I I I VIII 8111 I111IUII1 I 11 IOI■ nl t= t� 1uIIII I nur 1 1 i nn n avian I,NII� Nfill I 1 t`i �}Iillll� t l�1111 1 I �t;� =1fi 8 l IIlI ll IIuI �� rlrl' c �mi , ding v n r NLn nn 1 nu 1 ii . 1 u Irnlannulnnr Nui nu nu a AIM nm f 1111 I 1 I I H■lu jgIIu!It'11�I1t�t�Il� I�' t I �� I'I/�� /t T n 1 iiilll Ln 1 L n 1 � 1tl�ilin�i rl�l t !u IIm1 uu1 `n l ■ Ur nn ■uunuu n i I' I � I �I�I UI iI 'I IIEJi I llffll uIL 1IJJ Iuiuft WOLF STORE -SOUTH ELEVATION i��ttnn((�� t mworm. memos. r 111 rU!r,., ..�1...,..1.. ■ Ti 1 11��1�11 t 1 l I >i� gri I�, 1 11 t 1 1 1 1 1 wmlrwu•Iww.a 1� 11111 itioui WOLF STORE -WEST ELEVATION 1= 1 , 1w.oe•A•.• memo/en a 1 JA A I< 1. ∎. r 1 s , w be J 1•. IiO 1411. ul>,w.1a 0.11.47.11.714 (1117,10nr onemmtelmsbn M' .d VAIL RANCH HEADQUARTERS ana %Men lb WOLF STORE- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1 -A3.1 �m0Q614e11146 R,.,a !WI -t .0114)'1 A1ME4 RIO 00140404E Of 110 O ROA00N PIM4S 001 401 THE PURPOSES Of COCOA C0001N4C 0144 APRICAHC 4041. (0005 1)40 0104N4C(q AS ells AS C01440010 41741 100100 ROeo NCPILAMNS AW 2010411144 KIM 0010)40[ OCES T 1 iA WWIY Of TIC PLANNED SYS W 0(3 1 016401 3 4 O OR WI SYSTEM SW- 413:04.017 6011 00.9514[ 11.60NA1WS PGT ANC OMAN 44 4N DE 1004010 WAilx 0151011004 S151CN Con II *COED 4OD01 N4STNLAION C A POP 3-+W LOY, 311 E 0 55 . C1.17 010 WOO. 10 INSURE AOEOVAIE 119734 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLAN HISTORIC VAIL RANCH, REDHAWK TOWNE CENTER IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA D 1 OPTM - IIA DHGAPB_ARMIEEE C CIVIL RHGRIEBIL MOM l 4)543443. mal aR OW ma 140030701 AM. Inn On 6w0 64 0. Po. )) CA 60734 00401 (a 104 61(01* Mon. lion al 1117=11 .0110t 1601443 WK. 70 ( 1611 ) 661.70. MOO (MO) 660.64• ROC (IN) I74.60R 61 (MO 64. -064 R1�0ENC AAryails EK)) gY/IR 40. T-i•61 M IR0.6o 1 IM 6MM 1 OW a 1 wog* 0176073 11IX II [02 N 00 704 0Y 05 m 003 3 , 430OI0u 434410 44 *10406R0050 XvweNNnAnX4NracA4l 04100 WOW,. 1 4n.101100MI NMWOFIROMIw 60I40LC7.114.0A1.14.00WWW1 O40N0 a1d1 w IOI MIter. 4e0W41001. Ne M 4.RM0rt*4A04u3s Coon - .1 444146 IRCa: 4014V116wA UUfncwuartmoma4OC .eAwerm000Um.NOavoaer rt 441x0V1144N 044401440 0040.00 /1/ 154364 f61MR14W 44441 4 0111 w 1,w+wl,w.lmra 016 > w 1ew110 461" xwv 04.011.400.614 141.vi sow. ^r!- 5, 7011 CARES ISOM 0031 � ARCH/1E= rib Man.: 0.fet 414 6g S O w ALL "5-0604 ISGA1. D)ISCRIPIION: S AL MOOR 4 MOW 0. I3a. 0.311. 11444 M MON O 44400 WARM 0141040 0000 N FOLLOW. 004014 IOW AROOM 0 AT PRI Lon 46N01Or 'MAW10076 VW 54131.6 02 No 10 1 4 . 6 100004 IOt�ID .IRM P 3022-10 KOWS Of a 411 101 00041: 0.a. COO.. 00 10.6.0070 a.O00 Al 00 SO06143Rlr 6 Or POOR-Off - 7 N 1104 R LOT WI 60A0I40I ND. 41161t0000 M 6005047 X. -.waft WOWS CP MOW CORN, 04.. MO rover Aw o0 CO 1160117UOa 110 7.0f 04(5 110•33 M0MAS1I34Y NOR MD 1345061 WL 4011 6Y OP 4 MN. A OO7NO n 6531 RV, N 11{ 44t 7017 C /046100 DCO2 NORM 21 Oo' eat. A PINK IMO fat mow NOW Sr 63 OX OW. A 04705 Cr 6060 an 4)540. OWN 7700' WV. 63174120116 ?47404) Ton4 63404 4•44 1 .17. A 0.31404>< d 100.4 lot 7100: SOU14 410 *1 W CAW. A MAW Cr .ban 1015 1100 NR6461 NCOn.MT. A SWAM 01413070; R RC watt 0 R4Mw RECEIVED THEATER IURF AREA & HEAVY USE AREAS ORNAMENTAL TURF: SHRUB AND GROUND COVER: BIO -SWALE /DETENTION BASIN. SHEET INDEX: COVER SHEET. INDEX MAP de NOTES SHEET 1 (L-1) IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET 2 (L-2) IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET 3 (L-3) IRRIGATION CALCULATIONS SHEET 4 (1-4) IRRIGATION DETAILS SHEET 5 (1.-5) IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS SHEET 8 (L-8) PLANTING PLAN SHEET 7 (L -7) PLANTING PLAN SHEET 8 (L-8) PLANTING DETAILS SHEET 9 (L-9) LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET 10 (L-10) LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET 11 (L-11) MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS SHEET 12 (L-12) PROPOSED LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: 0 SO. FT. 0 SO. FT. 39.975 S0. FT, O SO. FT DI_ �� 011L TOLL MU I !OD -21) -2600 O 004 CO 60A1M01101R ND4 Of MOON OS.“11■ ODE .4 MOONS 00110 3401 - 20' N/A * . 00 I Po. W 1 05.0171 0°14044) SI•LiY 501.0101 13 am nownaf gay 64.64. a 0414 O -)411 110 !O. berm 0 - 30 - 01* Ms 27 &O. 11 -24 -07 MGM) *3 Olin !NZ L 4°."'" a1�1M' J LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 6107 0455.116416100*4A01 . 431410 4441 CNCSINITAA,. Cots 0705.6 70011.3-0644 PAX 000/410.0640 cur OF TL MI CUL A cowmen Or Pteuc IOW MUM: & C6V -SITE HELIUM DFIGATiast TIME SHEET BLtMr * Tell /knob RM1.w)f Ta4N4 Cont. 06.46 N.- L -1 IRRIGATION LEGEND I.aa SMm10M E O A 011• Ds 111.4 v 111.4 X Mar v 0.p. w+4( M Ste, ' MY :t »m a w ; 5.V / Im1 Y.O- IaSMSV V/ 40 3011 0. 3.0.00 On .= 1 m 5.L / •4(q•MIOp M/ AO ROM I - !.11 444 MIN= 4' m mss /Ia%.4.swlMa I/ an ROM Oa•46m4001 IOM 106 m IwN /!M1-U.em11145 3/ 03 EOO Fa•o10.101UO14(0 (S 2 0 300040 5.01 /.1.M.710 MM. O ® OI 110 *101 aim /*MO MAMw 4031 Ma Woo (] 0 ® •s4. ens ,n./a♦4F140e.1a / VMS 50*.r•• O 0 0 O` -wmX *RS /MES-WI00{14%/e,41 S?OMWi im 0010 140 SOSO WOW MUM Si IOW* OA *WAR E IILIIC NA04A1011MS '( LL1 Maaar 1404111 e NMI 034001 31311E ▪ 01303E MLA* ROAAIO OP 0000100.40.0 AI MEM IMAM OIP Marta 1(11 OW OWL 007461 /033401300 014 OMUA 430 DOS V550 WOOS VAS N0. 141 101[ 13 4 (93Me5 �] 0.014 El MX 0RF WMa(14 IYIAOM MSS /Aa3-MM *ONE* SC Oft M AI 1443 / 301401.1 -t 16141 RS 0° 10003104 9491 11101051 0-00 / 3111-0 0/ 3014141 114 nog .014/ p W W. 64•004033 IWO/0 -42003 M113(44 030 • / oo- ma1}4.M1013,3 914 IS 14430 MOLL SOUPS A 902 Oo O 11,33 • Ma. 0101 POgeM4 OI11r. ■4S MAO / OY.0L114R13 914 a 000 6M. ▪ / SIMMSWV 1[44 / 143 N MI /1.111/ MMI S / 1010 MO Maly WIN /1[11.3,0.11-4,3•11 003/303 OiKl q/l QAW IJ! 0.100017 5100((80 PC gad{ �A�ga/A J S0.mIL9413 0 %1110. M40 / SW 5¢x EZ- FLO- FERTILLIZER INJECTOR SYTEM 0LL1 TOLL FREE I -M -227 -2600 LL t IL 103 ( 0. 33 0 1001AAEM00 0 310 *0142 103101 CA11M11 14114 MI 201 141413(10.114 MUM ROOM MOLE 141Mal Asp BAr. a.. « «... -- ■ 1 «.I1 , " I Kr, WA 1 - . SM 1 /411 -1 1E-IS 0 5. all W Ir•1(m 10 AM MM 4-7/ 44 444 to ea u rr au 11r3 NS "r -' W S0 .41 W 0.M 310 AA W S0 Sm Sm 111) am ALL w 3 /, 914 314 901 a(Wm 0.k Ms US SEISMS 01 M •MM. MOW. UE 0104141 ( I /{ 4(i 30. U /fll. 1 0 3 (0' 03 O M1 as at BLOW Ma* 1) XL Mar. ICONS O 30041 301 4. .1MMINE0041 *Tl11 WIDAI 1/42.13 1 /Ma MS S /1414 I.11MIILO41 3•4114.410 A 4(11YLR13 A 11'113.117•15 1 -140 tilovMO( ,PAl1H9T1I AW3 11.91191)0 E. rt./LOSS /EOM SAM 5 1111x14041. aIMIlla vu 4114.4 15•LMTOM II-II 4.111111 IAA a% (11910(1/1 l09r. (1Mal(N(LY4EC EMS OS ISICSA ISOKI00CAP OME(OnAti • SARA 41. DMUS 02.33 1V33 111431•3 11 41 31 34 1 3 119 1.0.1U0R 310N10O C'W'.114)(01 3IMO 3.IV' 11001.011.04/ 00111 4 1 0 030 FIXRML0011403*00101.'1MIM 10.341' 311410110* 1I) V,l l 4F 11410010 I' • 11(14119131(099911311. :941.51L 941.2431 4/310)110033 14 % A R'f AIM' WMQ'Tg9 ARROW It•MA4.4310.L11(4 IC.1 13•71 LINE MOM SACK !LOS /ALEKICR ML/IF: 114115L 1.1.457 39111.003 lIvalLILSwinrruc 10431 17.1I0-3]I A! 1134 i1 I1p1:RCKACI4 uhvl.af.l SCALE: NTS Wana14 to I 43107 042 (xmAae O /911 .P( ....M. hr... • �001a 20(3 ]WV 04U* L^L IMAP1•G ! A ' asOn 1t/ 41.00.0.(331* 20 143 LS; 4144010 0011( 90. - 10WIES 0 . p4py0aa�r 00.41 Co rasa Or MEO EOM] 011 I1. LN] as. 110.1 17 MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET L -3 **MI .10,11 t owasaO1011 sus MSS 343 Maa0E a10pM Or 1 04704 * MLA 10.0.411* 1 C4 MRS 4411 10 4 313131 14 1110.0. It ow : 1104 81 00. 4 War 1a10%NI M 00 Pa 33. 3 0oRS1100 M0M314.f MOM 1 Mal* 0.M 14440.4 i 00111404114131* 401. 0.014.146 m a04VA11,0111M4l05 03 10 (8033µ30g? ARAI MO SMM0. 1413 MAWS a 41011 Mm (60144(30.04 030103010111400 a 10,10314 OIMI me OM* 1laaa4o0V LAMA. 4014 13001 4raad0.A1L MVO ova M.S. Mr 0Ki MKS MA M 033M,AMMa I Imo 33,00. 414(0. sass 6 13,400 M MM :1310 -3(4 04R IOM 0000U- /{ Mato. -� yr s � i YAK 010303 2 444 a.� 11= r. 030331 Ca0.1ie4 043+3 3( 010.! 40 to Oda* d OKWa3 0.t 0.130.,04 04 4 140x031 44407 1 0.4000E Oar WOW* 1x40 ROM 1O w Ma w (5.5S alatol0 e1005. aWMMK 11 /4 MNM%pI MO re WI Ift 111 LO ~Argil �wall1 MO LAVA. 0.W 04rtM01 a 6MMD MI *Ma IWIa10 MS smear. 0.0 0100 SOMA% 1 10 0313 (0333 pt w IRAMMO Mew M+00SO4 u ee 01M0py�wMM •«g4MfOMpm(IfMMOA.OsalS a r AlO4 10.14 /1 0. 14 R;YM MpM JAMES P. BENEDE I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SAW 1WM.1WOa(R AMY: .04130101 04N0INI FAO. OA 020MS 00/470.4030 FAX 7404(0•0340 6 CITY OF TEMECULA O PA911LYT or KAY: PRESSURE CALCULATION •..wl. M..•.aw .•---- -fR -•0 - - - - -- t .9{r__- - 7 1 / ■ y j F.T- ` � � °F. 7r - I rJ L �� . \ a rte, �iw: ." -moo ^- --- -_ - - -- ..� ` - � � 1 : 1.;�.'�S ` til , ' /U�;� / � 1 yl : r -„ ,, @:. MATCH LINE —SEE SHEET L -2 MONO • SNIT/ 4 DM TOLL FREE I -E00 -717 -1600 07 UAW n0 WI Wilt 1nV N 1•91•U/.964 470 • 1949011 90214 art eV /11+190.4 5 MOW I0 a [ v.e 19 0L.9aa rl 1 1�1� per b1e-11 ■ I A 490 f -JO -. 016: - Acs am E1131r aaK MO AC( AL & l I 71 1 ttal -w JAMES P. BENEDETTI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 44037449041197119 000 096 , SUITE 0202 sot 4 �NOIN ITAB, CA 700/410 .0914 FAX 7007479 01146 ary OF TEMECULA Owaaaew Or max Rants IRRIGATION PLAN 191MSAo Y.R Moab 89110.* 19.i. Costar Ora.., w. L -3 F 3 4 12 SEE SHUT L -2 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND MONTH MINUTES 0807 000611.5 SPRAY MINUTES moron RS 0ON.114 Md*/7ES DRP MNU1E5 SPRAY MINUTES ROTORS JANUARY. 5.5 4.0 12.5 JANUARY 50 35 12.0 FEOFIANRY r,s 4.5 155 FEDCRUNLY MARC-I PO 7.0 40 5.0 130 16,0 MARCH 7.5 5.5 10.5 APR .1 10.0 1.0 21.5 APRIL 9.5 6.5 21.0 SAY 44.0 7 5 245 MAY 10,5 7.0 24,0 JUNE 13.5 90 285 JIU \. 72.0 55 260 .LU.Y 15.5 0.3 29.5 A/LY 13,0 9,0 29,0 Al1GU51 13.5 0.5 29.5 A<0U5T 13.0 8.0 29.0 SEPFENUE < • 10 90 245 SEPTEMBER 105 55 24.0 OCTOBER 50 5.5 17.5 OCTOBER 70 50 17.0 N0VEIJEBER 2 0 50 150 19010:ME4Ez( 55 4.5 165 OECEM5ER 55 4,0 13.5 DECEMBER 50 3.5 17.0 NAL TOLL TREE I -600- 277 -2E00 A/ LUST roc an IDOL 0700 woo*. 6401 421 <e xL•e• w<Aw 7.22.1 I d�T rat 1• A ' » • 1 7 1 . •�- u1-�hf.'` 7( k >, _ - ^ = C HYDROZONES MAP SCAM I p6 719040000 E 1 HY0ROZ0NE 2 HYDR020NE 3 Om. SD um O y4. 00615 mUeA11 946, >6f, NPN KA LOCAL 001 (ROUE IRE COWS, OM 1 1/2• 010760 POI .190 COMM O OCOCSTR 610: CORNER COINE 00 PODIRp710 OF416N ulce O6 miw r roe wow wets REMOTE CONTROL VALVE wR AT MASTER CONTROL VALVE r- 20 1 06• N/A :Oar7ICEti: tgas. fie MY W Art f4001N�M d 409. /0 t8 * AC WOW *V 78 AL 6/ 700 OA 01 SAWN 041 40.1 80 PR. NO 01AA 0 110151 FLOW -CLIK 7.400P b l Qom E7 I CA*1100 By I 1 /A•/ **ow law 11420, Cots A 18 (VIE. r - 1L WATER USE CALCULATIONS TNs u4Y0in ao4aar IA.Ifyos,o.1. 1 le WNN64wrA ncd6W wale, uwd 0000 AA 0 N MI Pam/ (00) 0104 and *boo •O'O yshm*SO en MD CID2ay1'EIPCO 40074) Kelm.* 297Bond /.101m007W wwlr tax* Owl. not. a PF 07 01040 14we•r• 1pa/ s7Ww* an E *072 U2%7 47*ARW. 79 WAN/ /NA wAr04o0042, 4.4oi91 PF0105am79A.•• mW ay7'Ar w80 011E 7101 TO)T6 %1Two r• 1r10Naq Aaw(OW MA\WRI APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE WAWA/ AWA = (ET07(06211H0 a LA) / 403108)1 IMWA . U4.W1(002)10 0 AMEN/ 10 3 4 OR 407000. 1.346.10691/P {Wags 1 t R W ATED ANMML WATER OR MAYOR EAVA/ • (ONO 921109 a W 17 • IAN 11104000 I SAW • (EIo)1062)1(PF • 1A) /IF • SIAI MWO • 0 NM 002)1404.22.1601 /000 *01 EA6N • 330,180 OM / I1 1•7(.3X.2 EAYAI • 0:10) 0.0271(PF1142/IE • 9007 EAWU . 464 007(0621))04 /0 / 9 CAM) • 110.024 98(4. IOtle019r. (.4.9U • (.MIN 02)IIP5.04A7/IE•SLA) EAWU • 04 95))06744404 n 1 EAWO • 200151 96 /y/ TMMR90IEA14.1 •669.6620N/yr 198044198 (0.546029N1y<) Y IMO.. AWA)1.340.106 p8l /y0. PERCENT : E4WA- EAWU•'C0 • 1.345)06 raj- 04,01/W4 100 • 9114 NAM 1)45,300 TM 001 •110 s.dp 4 61 311 (71 06 49Oa60N) elA L,F A P1i Q Ir T 7, S fL * II WONT IS 70 AMC *VW YD TA/ 90.0181 /MEW 0 O(LO[S OWL 1005 9011 50,11(9 10 A LAWATO87 700 MAMA ANO 10000MI/CAIIVIS AL 10L MOMS MAY ARUM 6Q 07167: *11.IIIAIWI Ml( MOWED 910 10071010711 R1T CO 604 7dA4R4aO1 MIL 0•0104 W, IOIK SW L( WATS 59.001 MOM CROAK NAM,: 0170 armor/00O5( OOCQ66 Of LAC 90(980.1 70OACI. WC Of RC 90.300(06 SMALL APPLY: 1 r i 6P4LL B PRoor717 To 7.0 4 TX 0)0 Al 107 OF At LOMAX 1100AWTA1 . FAd•00 00_.(7) 6 09•16/N1 60.01 6N/r10 M 7100(0. 0C SOL MULT95 0098! 00 50007m. DD 04I LOCAL AC/ACV AS FM W NC 007910010 W COVILI404 w OW 39 A IALLSPgm WAL IAA X 00 LWWOW( 19040 A PLATO NV R100•TNM WW1 8,094 TO LAND Wawa 00.101110119 TO D4 0001 7101404 IRE 4006.07 Ammo* 0 7(110155 00404 0.001 000,07001910 ) RE N �AWMYWM CLAMOR OP mALIA* AN00 10 1LL704A0 01 0902 00000.0 6r` pOCN��({Tp1 61171_ riZ l NaMW NC 9001 AOC /r. 70740 O.Fw 11 -31-47 . �7 060¢ RO1 QN - 911 0698'41 047-007 (709 01051 10 9227 O O rw n 01774 0146 roC Owsvl vS.ST OCT AMC 0100 MONTHLY AVERAGE REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION 1001.5 PER VOW, ■CHES PER OA? 040401)4 9ANJAOV F'ELBROARY 69)4000• APRIL MAY 704.9 AUGUST SEPTEMBER 00ICOER Y01•YM DECEMBER ET* 2,14 2.71 3.10 1, 5.4B 6.10 6.79 6.75 529 1,08 3.41 2777 ANNUAL C70: 5499 OATH SOURCE THE CALFORN•A 0..601.04 SARACEN NT 44800RMA11014 599!.)49 taus) AND HE WA7ER- F7FICENT ,ANDSCAPE 0E5661 (CH *P'ER 17.32) OF T-IE 010 OF , EMECULA'S MUN C PAL CODE STA7OY 75/59ER, 62 5101004 NAME: 'ENEMA 970108 REG ON 50811T COAST VALLEYS 6 MONTH ESTABLISHMENT IRRIGATION SCHEDULE 0811• NUN PRIES 3 -5 DAYS A WEER 90165: 140 OVERHEAD :RRIOA:101 4461E OE 8504(7 BE19.1tEN THE LAWNS 0° 500 AS AND 6:00 PM 2. 11R90A110N CONTROLLER SCHEDULE IS FOR REFERENCE ONO' AND 417!2 BE OETCR•NEO N 114' FIELD BY 'BE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR FULL 0 1(040NE ARICA7100 50h0ULE UIILI2000 THE SHE 5011. EL AND PLANT IL5 FACTORS IN CCA.UNCTION *NI TiE IRRIGATOR SYSTEM TYPES AND CrIICIENCES AT 9 ER //STN AS DEIEEIML7E0 BY AN IRRITATOR AIRY- LANDSCAPE EAR 4005 MANCI OMIXII AW . 007(7 907 511N4 QA 0501154 7150/4 19•0614 FAX 70804740 MONTH JANUARY 400501• A 1047L MAO J.,NE ..L_Y A1OJ5 SEPTEMBER 06100811 E TO 0.09 a RUA/1Y 0.10 0.12 016 0.16 5.21 0. 27 0.22 016 013 (/0y61.08008 541 DECLYBER 009 MATURE LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION SCHEDULE OA _Y RUN 1:LIE5 3 -5 DAYS A NOES CITY OF TEMECULA 6180191 4 of maw vows IRRIGATION CALCULATIONS BI•torlo 10611 0..9■ 0•Q6.44 0.11• Gabor L -4 ORM 4PT 12 - — O O STEP. 1 T STRIP WRES APPROX S/8' F1104/ F1104/ (NO. O ° o-- N 7y N I j u I P I O �� J.. Y I "' G alli t. r MS/ Cp UM W8C DO REACHES BOtlpl. 1 n e� [! %:� • �,� II I' I — I � • �I q— I I� o i1 -11 I I =11 p I I� — II II p n �' p - _ 4 .1 " " --" �11 w ° u; w.R RUM M) END PAO( NO ROT CORWIN PACX, CUT 0 OIf09¢ DO Lo StaWyjnO,IPZ, y t 1 1 ��: ...0.• �, I t iSr b .� • •AP ° �! O p O O�.XWR(��uq uO o.mYYr O © its. mew .... 0 IV O 1 to r �vr t rx I .. RIM. sauio4 .0 n. r4 ewer ..c.rsA. 1.. POW. MIR MU ! MTO. OR/ MO OR M ROI 1.1v.v o" umnAaniTO.YC 0.4000g ria:.S. .— WMTIM ...U. M•..t ,.r � E O' 1 �iir� / //i / / i. ,/ i 0 0 vat.. r�.n... w�w ixw o Q ° Yo'a �+ ,v ,'.�4 '"' 0 «"•-.• .ivMM e.aAA/I 0 : 0 urr, u..w �o•.w• 0 •y ++ O' iK. a:.lno (5) POP -UP SPRAY HEAD M MA °a an taacwwruumur/+c MI 4 n.. E ONTTI.AE7 MUEYU.w.o Y10. W1 IM. 1 11JA. K1!11114AA.C.41r.e 1X1104 wsaz OIRw9a MO N MR moo. ci TRENCHING 4 WW C40 ENO Of SEAIN/C PACX WTI TAPE, �REW \ SEtUa(W9N ets / /// / / //, r..� % % i� / / // V O w 1.04 0' n, w wa « nu ( tit 10W 0. wf.1 (J +w: ,o($oue �• pr ra r O A tl ' /O W . OttR i ` OZA 114 02 BALL VALVE WIRE CONNECTOR 1 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE nu. Over ROTOR PcAO X..�. t / II Q 1 Lu01 Q2 EA(91 ova (�OEttFD CAP RM TIR PCB 9A ut 0 , - . ` - r ' • L' - 17N - IRTTr %tVR � OCrftOCP \ gcv4w Cl MKT UtJ.tN4.O h d' I All . Q- (} ( _ • I n i 144011 !' 1 - lik I , I I aIR' � « o ° 1 - • MONO I II co v(R it !I' C IN K1'EU14E ion taNOTIIMR(001 'il JA It , •• . .. ;;• c I HR' .. h —II' 'TT DAMS ESf SEER PfAG aPO1 PAVfl. e• m(a VN.VE R 1uAO�OR T AR OR Atx s /.• SOTTO ow 1 /•• srucl ELL — . m NP OT 0.01011 0.01011 A5 R(ODwtOY O/4 MEET Cu- P KW-OM RSV 1R 1 tCttu) O OP ICY DCOT w(rE 0 QM -- ^` ! . - - / ®IMi(NIED STRATA ROOT ST TUl ONWBER SWMMI jr 0 (OPI`CIYIl A. —1 11- n• t.+r.. 1 ww.r 0.1 Al �� ( 1 / / 1 At ■ .�� ( )i i 0..-ro, 0fi O Or MI W. 0 w t °1101 ami ixo ro 0 lAO,. K Xa 0 . m 0 .' 0 ^ 0, 0 weave 44 8 R Ww. 8 rt cow...). Lax � N I � `. B W(IW EEC OR DI/PPE 0 ti is rvc SCNEWU AO LTEIFI CA ()ROOT MDR750I18WPofR O NOR.: NSW. HUM FAO FARM SLIM- IN]WS.SEEE1£ it l !r PVC fO1tERV10N 1(F RTU ISAUTT roc 1NCEOf.t10 SITT*Ft PYC PN'TSWE _ r44EM4 2A' LONG ,VC SCTIEWtE W wnE. a tONG PK URAAE VR CO POP UP ROTOR 0 TREE BUBBLER ) 14 QUICK COUPLER VALVE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR O I O .4C r"'' U I O 0 o I ° I — — — — ° III O ° �`i! - -) PR .ANA .4YI1. . .- � MEOW MY. NOM. `..A�Ii .tl A•E q X1 1 11 -11 e w.YK II -11 G li=i ;.; .:._., .. } . r .__ o p ,.. O p X►wTH w nwww p — uOw. 0•.•• .,,a... 0 0O , 1..1 orX '.l (,;/ • • 0IRO 1.0.11 . .w+iLLwb�roi•luu..tmMr.. ... .....n.,X....... ..,...,- ..,� (0:14111,117 •P. ii: =.ii Q O �r �.a~u+e p 0 0..Ew.R RR. . 0 ..e • - mom 14001. O ..I .O030301 .�tN O �• 40R IfO. O.a[ 01 .... .n .. m 0 MR a1 r.v.w /e.. 0 M IM to nc tr.) 0 & Wa U,''" 0 .«:c vwv.•. f 0b tPd rv °' � 11 ° 0 01W.,t own" iRow Q atlYiR N.a tlW. o 1mar... nrxa 0 nu. 3/ V. 30,..01 p.. c ,X asn 0 ..c NiXr..Aao1 a+ ram ©n... NW 71 I(1lir�il �' 1►�ijiI - r ' it ..1 W v D� O I : O ' , 30 mew 1 .0� X► 0 M � , WO nl.q! �wYM t / Of , A • , 0 i YV. "w' " " i,TT IDX a >. o . 1 11 X VY « . . X � Y . t . ,S E. M . { a W a q .,f 1.1®...0,, o W1aTET.e1WR1tftWM) Ocvwxmunw 0 ...t ORw X.X. M .AmO 0 °0'"0.0 11..'' . ""°) C A O , EP • ' • • �� / y ��, • . � O: •ee .R M M W Wt ' S • . , .uiu.wcwvc , m ..O.a �a• c -• a, o O • • ►. """ O o v i10WC. war MVIU rYE � 74 °I ba� • . ' � e 0 0 ' LOOM MY Cr O 0 (11 DRIP REMOTE CONTROL ASSEMBLY SUB -SURF. DRIPLINE '1,.4 START CONNECTION (1 AIR RELEASE VALVE 14 DRIP LATERAL END FLUSH IMAM ft SVEN APPROAD 1 : ■ �'• DIRE TOLL TREE �' '` 1-600- 127 -2600 u kV / At W41 RO re coW rou on as n N4dVtf ^D s1TTi sor ll i J �j.^..� 1 �/ `l({y / _ awr.w 4r O.. ey Chaim! Ay n t+.r. MOWN= x o_ 1�mm am — CITY OF TEME CUL A 0PPA P 1n T Of PU9 C Nnras °a~' " �' J L-5 Pow 5 a 12 n = z = a �' - a ea JAMES P. BENEDETI I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT •n11 .NVG11C. MOM/ 0044I'M. MOMMA. '"' �• DETAILS IRRIGATION DA BLtortv YW amok Rtdh4vk Tornv Cuts •�+• 1•.10' (! y Ak� .......n Or. a -14.21 OT/I. l'••3 _ ._� au NA Ap1n �, M-I 1 R Ma _ �Y(D l Ni l "0 M = T a 1 L� XW. ] - - A1 — .YO. N/A - — - - -5 1IaQ NLf arPRly nV�a DIAL IOU. FREE EOO-fl 2690 6 ,1 (011 1 10 0 9 w4104•31•• WW2 AIM 121 WNW. (1100110 DOE el . F1. AN LEG-M) 130 A2 WW1 'HIES '." �• :A3•• W3- �. 1112.411•WAVI • O.I• 4.100111 KI 'onto. �i rs5iI10 'MS j 1 1- �•a.n w. Orv'A of. - 1221'0 fi KVW:v [012044 MAUL 0441. Its., .01 V''.. Orr' 00 2'' 001 001 •04 40 203 c3. V 1.41 Do.," IP 401 44432.3.1 \3(3004 •• 001 • ION• 1.01 0' 00( 11 106. •44 2 001 1 232 H/A S m. t1;V AC VA 6131.13 20 ! 10064 A �N a13 Au /A _1]1132 - t 11-4 0_12 001344 C' 044 S ?0405 r10121901110'4 1•i1 14 w (13).- (Y 411,94 0 04' : W 10' 1 t W 1.3 141 CI 2,1 0- UAW •n 11I 0 05 , .11.K� 11 33- oil 0 -1 31331310.1'<701 0(t Vol •12 (3.K 1 N. 1 1 -1 N. 3 . 2 151 0. D230/1 1. ar 114 1, 2 ftti .1 33.40..\3.313( 1,141 \x %A (;)2L' 11 4, ∎11 i C I •V 11. 141 103 1 -2 1N •OU .uK. I+•u•YA 10H 10 2.2 ., 1. (31 LYiA f C4 / 1 1 3(.'I1iK• 1/q Vin 010 Vi(0 w4.Vp 10.V. 21 2 0 � • 11.144• .04o 3 , 3 3 .•f N.: 437 f 0/� 1 440 µ I.1•P iw.2w Mf OM'+'W1o4.A1V f a3- 2 g 4.44 sio20*1*Q Wf 1116 - 2 nO1Ap.hN AO. . 4- .PM•.10441 •i•. 2N •• V Ot+ .01' 041 334 1.5t5' Sit +1 5 CAL ^ aM p •0'2w•I. 00 n la • `M 0W. 2 ' ` 144400044444 •M.3(04*A eat.' 1' 14. 2' l l ' . ` K 1930'.04 NCOY 110'W _ (�'A4. 3-'1 NU' 1I.ca1 •f.w lwvw.n 1210140 0 SYtn wl30vro falF OLCOWE4 (0 R0 am lttfPRr m. Orr ow. MI(CRM i 1044 •Waf 066 /A / 2171 4WM I} -11 -02 T1K 0434401/ 13/32-: SEt 0144 31 03144E tipBEA DO IM 4 MK Stt.OJLLh1S /44I1 410101A'• aN.' • Y 1C:• 104■.1'04■ 004.033[14321 a“ s 110 FAO" i JAMES P. BENEO LANDSCAPE ARCHITE 4401604557401011- 81110 mot OIVOINHrAB. QA 6221073 000054100044 0/V1 111W470064$ MAMA sari usw f to 11 1 204(0..•. ftot 11 41 01 141 K 1 •313/211311 Oloi i 04•• •11 •11' St m Y W0 CITY OF 'ELMECULA 0(FM2103M 01' /.1011[ WOKS PIANTIVG PLAN RMetor(a Vali R0oih R.dh1 +4 3200001 Canter '021 03-1 arc re 44 032 2. i I, -7 Pest 7 4/ 12 PLAN LEGEND o.n.0 Cc_ A•N ST .3:1•f•ecSV3 .:C• 0.4.• WNW O4•vt *MC6b ors •)e1MM whaS C} J 1401• . M.7 <.•,tf 311660* CY♦n d.. Q150r-1.1' 744 .0," a IN »vs •ol(0 46 (0x pp .4*. 0 6 .0 33) TD•.• •ANNNO fVIACNt 7I43A3 ��<• •E9N1= N 07 667* 5 00 0(0 26 5 . 21«..,' 1:•.•+ •533• . .•31 Ws- may_ POOP 15400 o*w.•.r S.W -e3 Kam +CWN'. A m x1 .I AAC u Y51 � c 9.CC1,91'5 1 ry K.'rlrt. u _co F.1M)I!ON GSPN000'44 I n~ 1 344.5c -I. •3030, {:). !t *;6666 �Anr9:�" "m F DIAL 7011 FACE 1 800 22) 2600 1457 1F 3)33 ' 661054 700 663 4116..40004010111(l 10.011 MM. w%!5 C •3Ny4 W. 1 ,iM •XL M . ,LCwS 66.6666 3•:. TOTAL 17.3130, HMIs - 626 006 Aa YASC a- - 3 1)• 246635' Xo. R3.5 65.0, rH •11 .• FEN FILM 01011.K 1r0W !•I.{• 3s ocs E3' 303 )•'1W r' rw r•' Po. Ir • 04 • l CII S 0.1 !1. 00ti OT4 T.•) • N' CC KO • 01 H5 I t• [0570•0 '6265 I f`A — • 00% 'IV tl NV. 01 t .• l0 NE • 61.0110 11 t ) 71 1 IN 11, -- 73'.771 It 1 NI ANNCx ( 1 I I I - au1Ewc - -' 4 1.98* 5,6. /t: w 1 s- '-'•-.."!7 * /, .1 a42ssf. >� N 0 to 20 so N 6 O.o.:N eN I. - DUI w I000 5100E • 2d x/ e"*".' M 1 6x,•70 e t Checked pI Lf�E6L = — mA. A_N' X11 W 0)00 TAFCC eUIO7N • WET' NWM00T0 6676 IK4M1101e1f Mr4 44-7760 er 4376` COW 040 V iWA: dFIS e.CE 300 t)113 6wn (6 -07 -0) 5 I wit JAMES P. BENEOETTI LAND ARCHITECT • 000) SCAPE Mt 7T AV11._0UNC Sol MNCINIT75$. C O5 9oW.10 0044 r/VC'300*47 SCAM. 1'•• 211 CITY al !rM1 CU! A (04ent0(r47 7Oft4103AS PLANTING PIAN HI .ati. Toll Ranch Rodhowie Town. Con1•f 3A.1eod1