HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-058 PC Resolution PC RESOLUTION NO. 11-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED
"AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA10-0147, AN AMENDMENT TO � THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT
CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO)
BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT" (APNS 957-170-032
THROUGH -036)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On May 12, 2010, Mr. Steve Galvez filed Planning Application Nos. PA10-
0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-0146, Home Product Review; PA10-0147,
Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148, General Plan Amendment in a manner in
accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. On November 16, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended
approval of Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-
0146, Home Product Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148,
General Plan Amendment.
C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. �
D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on November 16, 2011, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
E. At the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve �
Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-0146, Home
Product Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148, General Plan
Amendment with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program
subject to and based upon the findings set forth thereunder.
F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. � The Planning Commission, in recommending
approval of the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zoning Map
and Text Change Application No. PA10-0147 is in conformance with the General Plan
for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of
the City:
A. The proposed zone change is consistent with the land use designation in
which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and
Development Code;
This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36295, Home Product �
Review Application and General Plan Amendmenf from VL-Very Low Density to
L-Low Density Residenfial. The General Plan Amendmenf and Zone Change to
a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster
subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 13
acres of the 25 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby
promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide
additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General
Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the
City.
B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs,
and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan;
The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with
the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other
Ordinances of the City.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Zone Change Application, PA10-0147:
A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA), City staff
prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the
Zone Change and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the
Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that
there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the
environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.
B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period
and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The
public comment period commenced on August 8, 2011, and expired on September 7,
2011. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at
the offices of the Department of Planning, located at City Hall 41000 Main Street,
Temecula, California 92589.
C. Three written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a
response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning
Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings.
D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration
� prior to and at the November 16, 2011 public hearing, and based on the whole record
before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance
with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant
effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the
independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.
E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning
Commission hereby recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
prepared for this project. �
�Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No.
PA10-0147, Zone Change.
�
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 16 day of November, 2011.
� .�� � � .
Pat Kight, Chairman
ATTEST:
�� : . - L`y1.-Gr/-'' /�'�----
Patrick Richardson, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY�JF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify� that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 11-58 was duly and regularly
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 16�' day of November, 2011, by the following vote:
AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Carey, Harter, Telesio
NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
ABSENT: 2 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Guerriero, Kight
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None
Patrick Richardson, Secretary
� EXHIBIT A
CC ORDINANCE '
ORDINANCE NO. 11-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA10-0147, AN AMENDMENT TO THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT
CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO)
BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A
CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT (APNS 957-170-032
THROUGH -036
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula
does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On May 12, 2010, Mr. Steve Galvez filed Planning Applieation Nos. PA10-
0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-0146, Home Product Review; PA10-0147,
Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148, General Plan Amendment in a manner in
accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. On November 16, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended .
approval of Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-
0146, Home Product Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148,
General Plan Amendment.
C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California
Environmental Quality Act.
D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA") and circulated for public review from
August 8, 2011 through September 7, 2011 for a 30-day public review. Copies of the
documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the
Department of Planning, located at City Hall 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California
92589.
E. On November 16, 2011, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by
law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior
to or at the public hearing on November 16, 2011, at which time the City staff presented
its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support
or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing '
and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended
that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Dectaration prepared for the Project.
G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after
due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning
Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning
Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map 36295; PA10-0146, Home Product
Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO; and PA10-0148, General Plan Amendment
in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
H. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the
Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which
time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments
received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the
public hearing.
I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 11-
adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
Section-2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project
hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. The proposed zone change is consistent with the land use designation in
which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and
Development Code;
This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36295, Home Product
Review Application and General Plan Amendment from VL-Very Low Density to
L-Low Density Residential. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to
a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster
subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 13
acres of the 25 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby
promoting the goa/s of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide
additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General
Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the
City.
B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs,
and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan;
The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with
the Genera/ P/an and all applicab/e requirements of State law and other
Ordinances of the City.
Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the Development Code, Section
17.22 - Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District on file with the City of
Temecula City Clerk's office.
Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph,
sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final
court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive
legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and
words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by
the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days
after its adoption.
Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Councii of the City of
Temecula this day of , 2011.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST: ,
Susan W. Jones, MMC .
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 11- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading
at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , ;
and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of
. ° Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: .
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, MMC
City Clerk
EXHIBIT B ,
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
17.22.230 Titte.
Sections 17.22:230 through 17.22.242 shall be known as "PDO-12" (Walcott Estates Planned
Development Ov.erlay District). (Ord. 11-XX, 1§ 2(Exh. A(part)))
17.22.232 Purpose
The Walcott Estates Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-12) is intended to provide regulations
for a rural style, transitional development.with liberal open space. It is the intent of the city to create
special regulations that will combine open space with clustered sma11-1ot single-family resideritial product
to conserve open. space and drainageways and serve as a transitional development between medium
density single-family residential areas to the south and large lot rural properties to the north. (Ord: 11-XX,
1 § 2 (Each: A �Part)))
17.22.234 Relationship with the devetopment code and citywide design guidelines.
A. The permitted uses for the Walcott Estates planned development overlay are de.scribed 'm
Section' 17.22.236.
B. Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.238, the foilowing rules and regulations
shall apply to all plannirig applications in the area.
1. The citywide design guidelines that are in effect af the time an application is deemed
complete,
� 2. The approval requirements contained in the development code that are in effect at the
time.the application is deemed complete.
3, Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is
deemed complete.
(Ord. 10-XX § 2 (Exli. A (part))) �
17.22.236 Use Regulations
The Walcott Estates planned development overlay district (PDO-12), located between Walcott Lane
and Butterfield Stage Road, is intended to provide for the developrnent of forty-five single family
detached homes on fee owned lots, on 25.13 gross acres, with a proposed density of 1.8 dwelling
units per gross aere. The proposed project is comprised entirely of private residential land uses
designed to enhanee housing opportunities, consider natural features, incorporate private and
common open space, private recreation, and develop a common community theme. The project will
provide housing opportunities consistent with the City's general plan policies in response to local
market demands and will provide for a visually pleasing environment through adaptation of
supplemental performance standards that have been provided to ensure transirional compatibility
with adj acent neighborhoods:
17.22.238 Development Standards
The residential component shall comply with the development standards set forth in Table 17.22,238.
The maximum residential density shall be two units per gross acre.
Table 17.22.238
Residentiai Development 5tandards
Walcott Estates Planed. Develo mcnt Ovcrlay District
Residential Development Standards PD0-12
LOT AREA
Minimum Lot Area 4,500 square feet
Maximum number of dwelling units per gross acre 2.0
L4T DIMENSIONS
Minimum average width 45 feet
Minimum average depth 100 feet
BUILDING SETBACKS
Minimum front yard , 15 feet
Minimum corner side yard 10 feet
Minimum interior side yard 5 feet
Minimum rear yard 20 feet
Minimum building separation 10 feet
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Maximum Building Height 35 feet
Notes:
1. A minimum of twenty (20) foot setbacic is required to face of garage door
17.22.240 Project setting
A. Setting and Location: The Walcott Estates Project is comprised of 25:13 gross acres situated
betweeri Walcott Land and Butterfield Stage Road, at the iritersection of Butterfield Stage Road and �
Vista Del Monte Road. Walcott Lane is a paved; two lane road along the frontage of the property
and Butterfield Stage Road only exists as dedicated right of way. The existing right of way for
Karen Lynn Lane will be vacated as a part of this project.
B. Existing $ite Conditions. The property consists of undeveloped land: Topographical relief
'ranges from a high elevation of 1365 on the northem portion of the property, to a low elevation of
I258 near the south western poition of the property. An existing watercourse traverses the southern
portion of the property, flowing from east to west.
C. Surrounding Land Uses and Development. A tract of single family homes exist to the south of
� the project, large lot agricultural lands exist to the east, and rural properties lie to the north and west
of the subject property.
. _ .:� T � .—�. _ . �
.�---,_ - f
Z '� ' � �
i ;'� � ---; i
� ,. . � �
PA1O-0748 • ~ �
, .,
` / . . � �• . . 1. �.� __._
•'t�^` ' ' C �_ ' ' _ _ ...�
J� f f;:� _ -
. , ii ' � ��
� �
--- �._, :�
����.�.� � ��: � � _
. '���' s i.i „" i • .��
.�L � �-,.. ,:`_. . 1 / � 1
---,.� .,� �—�—�--._,_ � J '�(�-- c - 7 - 1
� = --- _"`Y� r� l ' f �iC \ \ ` ! i ] �
(Ord. 10-XX § 2 (E�ch. A (part)})
17.22.241 Supplemental Design Standards
The development shall be consistent with the following exhibits:
Exhibit A — Site Plan
o..�.=. . _..,..,�.
... .�....
.. �,,,., � � � -
._.... ..�,..._....,_... r-,.«`.r. " - - � . —
, _ . ......... . — ....� 't^�.� .� . ' ��, ��1\
/' � ....�.. ^�...•_
r �' � ■
', t r , � � �� _ _"�`"- ........,_.... - —
� , =j -i �' �x ♦ :
. .�f _ � r'+' � .t I ',��� ,�Tt� �� j � ~ _
)Y � f --�� i �a s
. _� � 1 �; ��►'"', �+�`' �� s . �1
- - : `�,. �1. i. �,',•. , 6 t ;"ta - r ` � : � �y
.,. � �`` �
� "f��•� y �� r ,�' � . ;"� � � � � :
' ',
. ' s� �, '.� �� �` �' * ' 11
'+` r, ,
� ' r. _ � �
. �f � '� -- � -� -�, �
. �i ,�� �'� � � �,..
,. � _....�..
�,� ,` y'' � � �� �°"�°�`. �'
,_ �-, >�`''�,<�_ � ��; �1 ' y � • L� � � `, � i
�. : ; �. � ,« ; �'� �.�, -� rs
',� �f ,`�i� � 1 i � �� �' �" . � . �j�� �° � � L
1••��11 3<!�� ,:. �f J � � ��� �M' 1� � �► '� � �
'� , 1 s"`• ��'• '" � i �''`�a �`� - ��� t
w * 4 +� �-� ,"`� �� -� -� �
:� ,,�'�►. ,� �' � �, _�, Q .
+ �+ ! iw� J , : � a �;;, �
•� � � �� �� � � � +����'���4�r w`;� "f �.
-- _'! f. t, t f. �., � L t t�t �-E +L i! t�. l. i• � L ti i. t.
..�.s.e,�.
....�..o...
PLAN YEW � �
Exhibit B — Mailbox Trellis
�VOOD BFSM 4Rd04
�
R'
� MAIL6�X C:JS1�R
•
, �•� Y ,
. � a�
t :. y
- uQQ� J d•�!
.R � r r ' . 7,
y ��:.. ,
'�.
r ' 310rIE'JBI?ER
� � C�Wf.Atl �A;E
— t
+� o
MAILBOX CLUSTER 1 /4" = 1'-0"
Exhibit C— Section at Butterfield Stage Road
a:.r,
sree�rraees _— .�. . �� ,-•
�� , .�'�: :
`� ?�' - ,s. � .. •,�Y
� ��'\t
�� •� _
��i {^:[
y :; ` �
� � -�'�
A �
.,� �
� <
� � T - � StOPE PlAN1NG
�. �-�' M1 �;� ' / `� � :
��. .:; s� �
_ y 3 q �y �
� ., . ti ':k,. F; . . ' �,T7 • � � ;4, t .
BUTTERfIELD R ��
6' 6' �•
SIOEWAIK PARKWAY
PLANIING
SECTIOIV AT BUTfERFIELD ROAD 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exhibit D— Typical Section at Interior Street
. "' .' ..3�. _ . . . '_
�
Y
� i : 4.. ,.i�i. '
. ,y i�,�'.� �
: ���r
-,,��'�'� �".
� � � � �
_�_ �
S
s
�� ;�
� _,
�; .� {
�
-' . � :,
ttPI:.AL S E C TION aT INTERIOR 5TRrET 1/4" = 1'-0"
Exhibit E— Section at Project Entry
.. � 4 .. ��+ t ,g
. . . � � ;�:� �
�J .
� . . ' ��y' ' - 10[u MIR 1R � � � � �..
� / �
narro ��L _ �
� .aa��--� �i'
y ( t y � �, '
'� x � i}.� � _ . ' ��:.
/! � t , �,.
A' �. \' •� ^` . y� ��
.� �;�� # /Kllfl[YS�11f1 �� � '.Y � '.
4; � qA�{�1 ' � . .
� 1 ���N� � f f w
. �� �� .I .L. � ♦. � � � �
� � *� ..�i_i � .T w 1��
��1 [NR'�ulW � 4N�1 � tM�TkUW ��1
�3�. „- ��� ���„
� � s
's3; k• �� �'3
�.j. i r� � �;a
.��
SECiION AT PROJECT ENTRY 1/4 = I'-p
Exhibit F— Section at Walcott Lane
.W. `�
. . � . . � M.M�O 6:'
� �Y�N rIw
`��' i ���� �tRll.v�0� � .
»y�1� � , . � � � ♦ Y . .
� " �' nMa ' ,' �r �
—�\. fi � . - O ." IIlfN�Y
g� ; ^'� • , �'� - ,
� � � ��6�� . .F.. - r ....� .�.7
.� y �
t;.�., � �� � , �
r �. � r :'`� .± ". , �� J ' • r , , I i'.
w.�c.m.r, G � • .�. i. ,.AR�"' ... . 'o .� - �' " �� �:�•' . .�
i�h. � �' Y � . ' '
�y' . � !� . r �. / srr�a�nr�i� �
� u�rru..n
� � f .
� � �r,omu� . �
...�.,.. .� � .
a�.m
iECiIOV AT WAlGOTT UNE 1/I" . 1�'
Exhibit G — Architectural Styles
�� _ , , -.
, - �. •
�fi
,a �
� * Y:q'14�' �u . �'..
.i,.,
�!�. � . _ _ - �. �R . �.
y ; t .. ' r .
w,. . ���M.�V ..��• . �. =,�1a�� + * s' �
•� _ Y I_ . iT .
M� , � •
� ^ J � ''1 � +! �'
I Y� i�L �� L � �. . I � '�
�� . �� ,, w�i
��Y .y1 � � �� ~ . � i.p�
' �'r'i�7°9 - �^� V .^ . � _ _ — T�.
y �..r.auw _� � � '�
, �..i-'1'�M7.2.'�"7 � .
!�
77��7'� a' '�!l��� r
..1���_ :.� : _ �; � ����.
— — , i�,/�'h . ��.
Spanish Craftsman Tuscan
The architecture of the project shall include at least three different floor plans and three different
architechual styles (Spanish, Craftsman, and Tuscan). At a minimum, the styles shall include the
following features to provide variation along the street.
• S� stucco finish, concrete `s' tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, decorative accent vents,
clay pipe accents, decorative foam trim elements, wood fascias and exposed rafter tails,
arched multi-pane windows, arched entrances, front porches, and decorative wood
shutters. .
• Tuscan: stucco finish, concrete `s' tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, decorative foam trim
elements and panel type shutters, wrought iron accents, arched elements, decorative
foam, front porches and stone veneer.
• Craftsman: smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, wood fascias,
enhanced outlookers and wood braces, board and batten siding, foam trim, tapered porch
columns with stone base, wood railings and shutters, and decorative carriage style garage
doors.
Other architectural styles may be considered at the discretion of the Director of Planning,
provided specific details unique to the proposed architectural style and elevation are
incorporated. Articulation must be provided on all sides of the homes so that each side of each
product provides specific features of the proposed architectural style. Each of the proposed
styles must be differentiated from the others through the use of door and window types, window
and door trim, garage door design, materials such as stone, roof type and pifch, shutters and the
overall silhouette. In addition, elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space
must incorporafe architectural enhancements.