Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032112 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: PUBLIC COMMENTS NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET MARCH 21, 2012 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Carey Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Minutes of February 15, 2012 1 Next in Order: Resolution: 12 -07 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.. COMMISSION BUSINESS 2 Summary of the first three Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Workshops PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application No. PA11 -0226, a Major Modification Application to allow for an additional 3,771 square feet to be added onto an existing vacant structure for the future Neighborhood Healthcare, located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North, Eric Jones RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0226, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW FOR AN ADDITIONAL 3,771 SQUARE FEET TO BE ADDED ONTO AN EXISTING VACANT STRUCTURE FOR THE FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE, LOCATED AT 41840 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH (APN 909 - 282 -006) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC - The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing at City Hall's Planning Department Public Counter located at 41000 Main Street and at the Temecula Library located at 30600 Pauba Road during normal business hours. Additionally, any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commissioners regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review at the locations indicated above. The packet will be available for viewing the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting after 4:00 p.m. You may also access the packet the Friday before the meeting after 4:00 p.m. on the City's website atwww.citvoftemecula.orq. 2 PRELUDE MUSIC: CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Roll Call: ABSENT: PUBLIC COMMENTS TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET FEBRUARY 15, 2012 — 6:00 PM Earlene Bundy Commissioner Kight ACTION MINUTES Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio CAREY, GUERRIERO Next in Order: Resolution: 12 -05 A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. Pat Sankisian, San Marcos resident, addressed the Planning Commission NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes 1 1.1 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report 2.1 Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0 -; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; CAREY, GUERRIERO ABSENT PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Approve the Minutes of February 1, 2012 APPROVED 2- 0 -1 -1 -; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; HARTER ABSTAINED; CAREY, GUERRIERO ABSENT Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application Nos. PA11 -0238, PA11 -0257 and PA11 -0261, a Tentative Parcel Map (No. 36413) to subdivide a 2.75 acre site into three parcels, a Minor Exception to reduce the lot sizes, and a Development Plan, for three office buildings totaling 37,926 square feet within PDO -8, located at the southwest corner of De Portola and Margarita Roads, Cheryl Kitzerow APPROVED 3- 0 -2 -0 -; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER KIGHT, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HARTER; VOTE REFLECTED APPROVAL; CAREY, GUERRIERO ABSENT 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 12 -05 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NOS. PA11 -0238, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 36413 TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.75 ACRE SITE INTO 3 PARCELS, AND PA11 -0257, A MINOR EXCEPTION FOR REDUCED LOT SIZES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DE PORTOLA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (APN 959 -050 -011) 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 12 -06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0261, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT THREE OFFICE BUILDINGS 2 TOTALING 37,926 SQUARE FEET WITHIN PDO -8 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DE PORTOLA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD (APN 959- 050 -011) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Planning Commission, Wednesday, March 21, 2012, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Ron Guerriero Chairman 3 Patrick Richardson Director of Development Services DATE OF MEETING: REPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: BACKGROUND SUMMARY STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 21, 2012 Katie Innes, Case Planner Update on the Jefferson Avenue Study Area Public Outreach and Visioning Process The Jefferson Avenue Study Area is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, east of Diaz Road /Murrieta Creek and south of Cherry Street. The Study Area is approximately 560 acres and consists primarily of a mix of developed commercial property, and property designated as conservation /open space (Murrieta Creek). On January 1, 2011, in anticipation of the Jefferson Avenue planning effort, the City of Temecula City Council established the Jefferson Avenue City Council Ad Hoc Subcommittee. The City Council appointed Mayor Ron Roberts and Council Member Comerchero to this subcommittee. The Ad Hoc Subcommittee will assess future opportunities for this area and provide policy direction to facilitate the aesthetic and economic revitalization of the Jefferson Avenue area through a comprehensive Specific Plan. The Jefferson Avenue City Council Ad Hoc Committee met on July 25, 2011 and directed Planning staff to move forward with the visioning workshops and public engagement process. On September 7, 2011 the Planning Commission appointed Commissioner Carey and Commissioner Kight to the Jefferson Avenue Ad Hoc Subcommittee. The Planning Commission Ad Hoc Subcommittee was established to provide input on the recommendations that emerge from the public outreach and visioning process, and provide input during the development of the future Jefferson Corridor Specific Plan. In the late summer 2011, Planning Staff completed the existing conditions analysis and compilation of various planning and land use related data for the study area, to help inform the public outreach and visioning process and the future Specific Plan. To assist the City with the public outreach portion of the planning effort, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) selected the Jefferson Avenue Study Area Visioning Process as a "demonstration project," and awarded the City grant funding through their Compass Blueprint program. The City and SCAG collaboratively selected MIG, Inc. as the planning consulting firm to assist City Staff with the public outreach and visioning workshops for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. The City also hired Inland Planning + Design to assist with the technical planning topics planned to be presented at the visioning workshops. The goal of these public workshops is to develop a publicly- driven, community based vision for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area, which will drive the revitalization and redevelopment of the area in the future. The feedback from the visioning workshops will be developed into a community -based vision for the future and will set the foundation for a future specific plan. The Specific Plan will guide the future revitalization of this area over the next 15 -30 years. To date, Planning Staff has conducted three public visioning workshops for the Jefferson Avenue Study Area. These workshops have been well attended by a variety of stakeholders 1 Visioning Workshop # 1 October 18, 2011 Existing Conditions, Future Vision, Opportunities and Challenges Visioning Workshop # 2 December 6, 2011 Urban Design and Placemaking Visioning Workshop # 3 February 2, 2012 Identifying Conceptual Districts within the Study Area including property owners, commercial real estate brokers, business owners and other interested community members. The visioning workshop dates and topics are outlined below: To supplement the information in this staff report, a brief presentation will be provided to summarize the feedback received from the first three visioning workshops held thus far. Three more workshops will take place over the next six months. Visioning Workshop # 4 will be held on April 5, 2012 and will focus on transportation and complete streets. Visioning Workshop # 5 will be held on June 14, 2012 and will focus on market feasibility, economics and alternative development scenarios. Visioning Workshop # 6 will focus on the overall visioning policy recommendations and will present case studies that represent the recommended policies that have emerged from the visioning process. 2 DATE OF MEETING: PREPARED BY: PROJECT SUMMARY: RECOMMENDATION: CEQA: PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Lot Area: Site: North: South: East: West: Total Floor Area /Ratio: STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 21, 2012 Eric Jones, Case Planner Planning Application No. PA11 -0226, a Major Modification Application to allow for an additional 3,771 square feet to be added onto an existing vacant structure for the future Neighborhood Healthcare, located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North Approve with Conditions Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development Projects Lisa Fritzsching on behalf of Neighborhood Healthcare Industrial Park (IP) Business Park (BP) Existing Industrial Structure /Industrial Park (IP) Existing Industrial Building /Industrial Park (IP) Winchester Road, Existing Commercial Structure /Service Commercial (SC) Existing Commercial Structure /Service Commercial (SC) Enterprise Circle North, Existing Industrial /Industrial Park (IP) Existinq /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 1.85 Acres 0.92 0.18 0.40 Landscape Area /Coverage: N/A N/A Parking Required /Provided: 83 Spaces 72 Spaces 1 BACKGROUND SUMMARY On August 22, 2011, Lisa Fritzshing, submitted Planning Application No. PA11 -0226. The application will allow for a 3,771 square foot addition to an existing structure. Building square footage after the modification will total 14,234. The extra space will allow for additional office and examination room space. The applicant also submitted a Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy /Joint Project Review application for review by the Regional Conservation Authority of Western Riverside County. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project will allow for the creation of a one -story 3,771 square foot addition to the west elevation of an existing structure. This elevation currently consists of an attached garage that will be demolished. The new addition will contain office and examination room space and has been designed to ensure it is architecturally compatible with the existing structure. All finishing materials such as stucco, roof tiles, doors, and windows will match those existing. Water runoff from the expansion will meet WQMP requirements by being filtered through an existing landscaped area. Site access and circulation will remain unaltered since no revisions are proposed to the site plan. The project site is located within a criteria cell per the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). Therefore the applicant submitted a Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy /Joint Project Review application for review by staff and the Regional Conservation Authority of Western Riverside County (RCA). The RCA has determined that the project is in full compliance with the objectives of the MSHCP due to the fact that the site is fully developed and does not present opportunities for conservation. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the Californian on March 8, 2012 and mailed to the property owners within the required 1,000 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development) The proposed project will allow for the addition of 3,771 square feet to an existing structure within City limits on a parcel totaling 1.85 acres. This project is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designations and policies. The site is fully developed with service from all required utilities and public services, The site is located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell, As a result the applicant submitted a Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy /Joint Project Review application (JPR No. 11-12-15-01). The Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) concluded that the project as proposed is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements of the MSHCP. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species and will not produce adverse effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. 2 FINDINGS Modifications (Section 17.05.030.E) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The project will allow for the construction of a 3,771 square foot addition to an existing structure. All uses for the project will remain consistent with those allowed in the City of Temecula Development Code for Business Park (BP) zoning districts. Furthermore, the use will be in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan and with all requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is in conformance with all requirements of the Development Code, Fire Code, and Building Code. These codes contain provisions that ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the public health, safety, and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A — Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing 3 pgr N 46 , ',r '`` Mar w aar I'. . / aaC tat PARCEL 20 PAN 19582 -2 SITE PLAN r amallotanrl=fflegr 4. sNOr CC NCQ6 • p•• M••O a in vl'ma • • ab 2•• f..••OePM• it•nn•u+a w n•w••m•1•a •a•v..o•W.••.am ,4W PLANIMDES i•9hL••w0111• • u••••.••9.• w • • va_n..- .arab.2 w•••aw•w. m••vw 11.0•M a RI1.,a •9•x.ala•o o .••••.e ▪ •e•••A•t w••asww•.. SITE PLAN SIEE WRs • • wR••••.Yaaa•••as.e+ }••:lv.sf.•OO••O .•. •w • •nar•. w . r•x vn a.•.�a•.- •••••.ttx.r• a a•x•. •• w• •• •W 11001•C•a: x•%DM1Mw•�W 1•••••••••••••1 MVP. 190 1111•••••••••••• 1•00.0.0” N Cat n••••01q fM•Ol •••••WCdtrtW PM,. • •�0 •i V 111M1nMM• W •••••C•nW ••• ••�1rco0+• wrY a. ONCtta•.•b 40w •••• • •!•aq (N ADM OP 111(1•iV2at••P•Mr•0.9t a0•!tt • •0•16 IIas••••••••••• • fl•0[iM.IOAM'•• [ 1•.tu••••-t.565••S••,11IS) •/. ♦•w • • . ••+w:t9tm• an*. awln:•w • p�wnvv: aao ...t ■n1m».••••.1•1.nc,.•• • < t••••••••••• lrar••••••••••• (..1y.. a..nu••••a .••••w.a•rlwx•a . a. PPM a�� wq sxwmxa� mom as }Ir•ra.•,4••••• •E •••M +tai aT1E 416CYS% lt•••••1•i•O•••• r•rL mop 11•01.6N W•••••••!••••• PM ••• 110.••••••a MAO PP •O ' .'••' •a•ai A•O..t•t • OM We Smug 1..301 FAQ,. V. 611-76 DNA a1waC6S' NENTETORHOCO HEALTHCARE 051, Oa SAW EWANb 491095 07t•1TU2•en '/. 161ry1133 1.91 C• 4 f sal SITE MN: Al 4. pry. HEIGH8ORH000 HEALTH CARE .75N DM Snol En•sads Ca MS ColetTn.Px. VAA Roc RAH A2 ' LL LL 0 0 0 1 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION E ..,ttmnulllnlllllnu 1111111 MEI WEST ELEVATION WM*AYS.rxLUe © (0.a. .T. r.W.a .. 9 Mr., o O ' .o>.. O to 414 ...mama 0 aa•.,Kro..>r...... WS Z. Sow sobw.0 V165 rttt i%7 r 65"7}40:67 orssoprollwa es. ctw HEIGF60fW000 HEALTH CARE USN q■6w .rs a92(03 tocOlon V. r6arn7+m um,RJ EX1ER$OR EIEVATIOHS A3 rt I 1 } ...nialIII11lt1110lllilltr DMA MAP 100116401 ® N...r... . ne ! A. PARCEL 20 PM 79582 -2 V +. CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN O e..w) torammw OOPS 61NYEYORWTES ..I.MP.. �nn'nYMtn.K•∎••29n. W.. NY ..bOM.t.1•1 MILL .. i .IYPOCQmI.. \ .VO .e lode. M(IrYlaa M.s .. •• �I..m.ew1:w•■ o .c . .a..... --fl— aafeuecYr.e tons aMriF - -e — a.w.owa.a■ - eu - IF - -s — .aeew..n. SRE AN61Y516 91E ..Mt% i n Nrae •a M..M. A. aco renraoax.w nw+n.m.....e...rwr smanuvawlswl�w. M EASEAEWS•EIMHTOC Y o ��nIVV..w•ru�anrac.. a - ter.n i red .aa..wev.F..ewalnrmnnxl.mrw.ao xrro-e a n . n.....a and. �r .4saawnd tm d..arr.Iroxr w••••• 1 u am s∎Frote . 'a o.A.K . '+.de s wn c ..ra . onr A ..on ruw+.wam.wesarom,oeonm..ms. w :u!wh HOeM.ONe.L4.9F..R ��I(�OJpaa9n 4lu 111•COM,A.Mm..F YVCev.wT9n< .esa✓R NrwP.Y. V _tcTf.nO.!•A. ' d A4.4edrlN.o..IM.Ne.ra M >t4• .c ken.w.arw.nn • �..t. •. a.. a<,{....2IM..A.Ib .N,. a �.. N. r. • r...r.el.vNra0.1•ene. aaan. C J ,fl5An5Y.. v.setrms% F SiSAeSssT wr.•a6c.ro. HEIGIO C100D HEALTHH CARE IAN pee 61.. E.I.M. Gr 9203 Y MTV= a 2 IS •MMIME ava, .war CONCEPTUAL 1 CRAMS PLAN v ryC� A mensal 0• ..n .. sT_ CROSS SECTION A-A CROSS SECTION ae C etVI v. r s�uxts� nog a«nm.m 'IE ICHBONH000 HEALTH CARE 01h DM Ha masa 0.17:11 v rumrm .mmu CONCEPTUAL OR/amosecTiow5 kna C2 A PC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA11 -0226, A MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW FOR AN ADDITIONAL 3,771 SQUARE FEET TO BE ADDED ONTO AN EXISTING VACANT STRUCTURE FOR THE FUTURE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCARE, LOCATED AT 41840 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH (APN 909 - 282 -006) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On August 22, 2011, Lisa Fritzsching filed Planning Application No. PA11- 0226, a Major Modification Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on March 21, 2012, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA11 -0226 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Modifications, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The project will allow for the construction of a 3, 771 square foot addition to an existing structure. All uses for the project will remain consistent with those allowed in the City of Temecula Development Code for Business Park (BP) zoning districts. Furthermore, the use will be in conformance with the City of Temecula General Plan and with all requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project is in conformance with all requirements of the Development Code, Fire Code, and Building Code. These codes contain provisions that ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the public health, safety and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Major Modification Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development); The proposed project will allow for the addition of 3,771 square feet to an existing structure within City limits on a parcel totaling 1.85 acres. This project is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designations and policies. The site is fully developed with service from all required utilities and public services. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species and will not produce and will not produce adverse effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The site is located within an MSHCP Criteria Cell. As a result the applicant submitted a Habitat Acquisition and Negotiation Strategy /Joint Project Review application (JPR No. 11- 12- 15 -01). The Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) concluded that the project as proposed is consistent with both the criteria and other plan requirements of the MSHCP. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species and will not produce adverse effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA11 -0226, a Major Modification Application to allow for an additional 3,771 square feet to be added onto an existing structure, located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of March, 2012. ATTEST: Patrick Richardson, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) Ron Guerriero, Chairman I, Patrick Richardson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 12- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of March, 2012, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Patrick Richardson, Secretary Planning Application No.: PA11 -0226 Project Description: EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PL -1. General Requirements A Major Modification Application to allow for an additional 3,771 square feet to be added onto an existing vacant structure for the future Neighborhood Healthcare, located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North Assessor's Parcel No.: 909 - 282 -006 MSHCP Category: Exempt per Section 15.10.00.E (Development on a project area that is currently or has been previously improved) DIF Category: Office TUMF Category: Service Commercial /Office Quimby Category: Non - Residential Project Approval Date: March 21, 2012 Expiration Date: March 21, 2014 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project The applicant /developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty -Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). PL -2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentalitythereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL -5. The Planning Director may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -7. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. Spills and leaks must be cleaned up immediately. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -8. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -9. The applicant shall paint a three -foot by three -foot section of the building for Planning Department inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -10. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -11. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL COLOR Roof Tile Match Existing Stucco Match Existing Door and Windows Match Existing Wood Fascia Match Existing PL -12. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL -13. The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -14. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -15. Double detector check valves shall be installed internal to the project site at locations not visible from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. PL -16. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Planning Director at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -17. If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation. PL -18. The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. PL -19. All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved. PL -20. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: No grubbing /clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre - grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30 -day preconstruction surveythat shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on -site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Department approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on -site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL -21. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -22. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -23. All downspouts shall be internalized. PL -24. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -25. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -26. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape (choose or add to as appropriate) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. PL -27. The developer shall provide the Planning Department verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. PL -28. Four copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -29. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five -foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -30. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -31. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating that The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -32. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -33. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -34. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate that "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure, which will require inspection of irrigation installation of open trenches. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems have head -to -head coverage, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify proper landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Department to schedule inspections. PL -35. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -36. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right -of -ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right -of -way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a PL -37. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -38. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Director, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Planning Director, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -39. All site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -40. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -41. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Regional Conservation Authority transmittal dated February 2, 2012, a copy of which is attached. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT General Conditions /Information B -1. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2010 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. B -2. Provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans. B -3. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. B -4. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. B -5. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. B -6. Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. B -7. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -8. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -9. Obtain Demolition permit for existing garage and concrete B -10. Commercial and industrial project trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B -11. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., and Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B -12. The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. B -13. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. B -14. Commercial projects shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B -15. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work for plan review. B -16. Provide number and type of restroom fixtures, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2010 edition of the California Plumbing Code. B -17. Provide precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. B -18. Provide truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -19. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B -20. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building inspector priorto the start of the FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F -2. Fire sprinkler tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Compliance with the current codes in effect shall be complied with for the entire building. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F -3. Fire alarm tenant improvement plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted bythe installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. Compliance with the current codes in effect shall be complied with for the entire building. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F -4. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six -inch high letters and /or numbers on both the front and rear doors (CFC Chapter5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -5. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5) . F -6. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or signs (CFC Chapter 5). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Applicant shall ensure any landscaping surrounding buildings is kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to prevent would -be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Applicant shall ensure any trees surrounding building rooftops be kept at a distance to prevent roof accessibility by would -be burglars. Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Any berms 'shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -5. All exterior lighting shall be in compliance with Riverside Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655, low pressure sodium lighting preferred. PD -6. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -7. Any lighting affixed to the buildings shall be wall mounted fixtures and provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD -8. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -9. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24- hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -10. Upon completion of construction, each building or business shall have an alarm system that is monitored bya designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi- tenant offices /suites /businesses located within a specific building shall each have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD -11. Any roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -12. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well - lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -13. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -14. Penal Code Section 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a civil demand program. The text of this section of the penal code can be found at: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi- bin /displaycode ?section =pen &group = 00001- 01000 &file= 484 -502.9 PD -15. Employee training regarding credit cards, theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security or any other related crime prevention subject is available free of charge through the Crime Prevention Unit. To schedule an appointment call (951) 506 -5132. PD -16. Any business that serves or sells any type of alcoholic beverage shall comply with all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all rules, regulations and guidelines of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. PD -17. Contact the Temecula Police Department for alcohol related inspections and training for both employees and owners. This includes special events held at business locations where alcohol will be served for a fee and the event is open to the general public. PD -18. Applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. PD -19. Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following: (a) valid California driver's license; (b) valid California identification card; (c) valid military identification card ( active /reserve /retired /dependent); (d) valid driver's license from any of the 50 States or Territories of the United States; (e) valid U.S. Passport; (f) valid government issued identification card issued by a Federal, State, County or City agency. PD -20. As noted above, onlya valid government issued identification card issued bya Federal, State, County or City agency is acceptable, providing it complies with 25660 of the Business and Profession Code (B &P), which includes the following requirements: (a) name of person; (b) date of birth; (c) physical description; (d) photograph; (e) currently valid (not expired). It is the responsibility of the business owner and any person who serves or sells alcohol to be aware of current laws and regulations pertaining to alcoholic beverages. PD -21. The Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department offers free business security surveys, to schedule an appointment contact the unit at (951) 506- 5131. PD -22. The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost for inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a personal check to pay for goods or services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of the business advising customers of the "Inkless Ink Program" in use. If the business becomes a victim of check fraud, the Police Department will be able to track the suspect with the thumbprint. PD -23. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identifywhen they are moving from public to semi - public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. PW -1. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -24. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5131. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed bythe developer at no cost to any Government Agency. It is understood that the developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -2. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on -site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City- maintained street right -of -way. PW -3. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right -of -way. PW -4. All improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. PW -5. The project shall include construction -phase pollution prevention controls into the design of the project to prevent non - permitted runoff from discharging off site or entering any storm drain system or receiving water during all field - related activities. PW -6. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW -7. The proposed water quality feature must receive a final acceptance by the City prior to issuance of any grading permit. PW -8. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards, and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the commencement of grading. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect the site (public and private) and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. PW -9. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. PW -10. PW -11. PW -14. PW -15. PW -16. PW -17. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soil conditions of the site, and provide recommendations forthe construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. Construction -phase pollution prevention controls shall be consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and associated technical manual, and the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control. PW -12. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the Planning Department, or other affected agencies. PW -13. The developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. The developer shall obtain letters of approval for any off site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters shall be in format as directed by the Department of Public Works. The developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works in accordance with Grading Ordinance Section 18.24.120. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -18. PW -19. PW -20. PW -21. PW -22. The developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy The project shall demonstrate that the structural treatment control BMPs shown on the precise grade plans have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and are ready for immediate implementation. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works the developer shall receive written clearance from Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal Water District, or other affected agencies. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. PW -23. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. •clonal onservatlon uthority Project Information RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) Permittee: City of Temecula Case Information: Neighborhood Healthcare Site Acreage: 1.85 acres Portion of Site Proposed for MSHCP Conservation Area: 0 acres JPR #: 11- 12 -15 -01 Date: 2/2/12 Criteria Consistency Review Consistency Conclusion: The project is consistent with both the Criteria and Other Plan requirements. Data: Applicable Core/Linkage: Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 Area Plan: Southwest Area APN 909 - 282 -006 Sub -Unit SU1 — Murrieta Creek CeII Group Independent CeII 6783 Criteria and Project Information Criteria Comments: a. As stated in Section 3.2.3 of the MSHCP, Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 consists of Murrieta Creek, located in the southwestern region of the Plan Area. Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 connects Existing Core F (Santa Rosa Plateau Ecological Reserve) in the north to Proposed Linkage 10 in the south. Proposed Constrained Linkage 13 is constrained along most of its length by existing urban Development and agricultural use and the planned land use surrounding the Linkage consists of city (Murrieta and Temecula). Therefore, care must be taken to maintain high quality riparian Habitat within the Linkage and along the edges for species such as yellow warbler, yellow- breasted chat, and least Bell's vireo, which have key populations located in or along the creek. Maintenance of existing floodplain processes and water quality along the creek is also important to western pond turtle and arroyo chub in this area. b. The site is located within Cell 6783. As stated in Section 3.3.15 of the MSHCP, Conservation within Cell 6783 will contribute to assembly of Proposed Constrained Linkage 13. Conservation within Cell 6783 will focus on the existing Murrieta Creek channel and adjacent riparian scrub, woodland, forest and grassland habitat to the extent feasible. Areas conserved within Cell 6783 will be connected to grassland and adjacent habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 6782 to the west and to riparian scrub, woodland and forest habitat proposed for conservation in Cell 6890 to the south. Conservation within Cell 6783 will be approximately 5% of the Cell focusing in the southwestern portion of the Cell. 1 of 4 *eons' 0nservatlon uthorlty W nbm *Mnld. county RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) 2 of 4 JPR #: 11- 12 -15 -01 Date: 2/2/12 c. Rough Step: The proposed project is within Rough Step Unit 5. Rough Step Unit 5 is out of Rough Step for coastal sage scrub. The vegetation communities on site include developed and disturbed land, no coastal sage scrub. Therefore, development on the project site will not conflict with or interfere the Rough Step status of Unit 5. d. Project information was provided by City of Temecula. The site is located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North in Temecula, California. The project site is already fully developed. The project proposes to expand the existing 11,826 square foot building by an additional 2,408 square feet over existing concrete and asphalt for medical office use. e. Reserve Assembly: The project site is located in the central - western portion of Cell 6783, which is not located within the southwestern part of the area described for Conservation. Also, the entire site is fully developed. Therefore, the project does not affect the Reserve Assembly goals of the MSHCP. Other Plan Requirements Data: Section 6.1.2 — Was Riparian/RiverineNernal Pool Mapping or Information Provided es. There are no riparian/riverine areas on the project site. There are no vernal pools on the project site and soils are not suitable for fairy shrimp habitat. Section 6.1.3 — Was Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Information Provided? N.Q. The project site is not located within a Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area (NEPSSA). Section 6.3.2 — Was Additional Survey Information Provided? No. The project site is not located within a Criteria Area Species Survey Area (CASSA) or any Additional Survey Area. Section 6.1.4 — Was Information Pertaining to Urban/Wildland Interface Guidelines Provided? Yes. The property is located near future and existing Conservation Areas Other Plan Requirement Comments: a. Section 6.1.2: According to the MSHCP Consistency Analysis prepared by Brian W. Arnold, Consulting Biologist, dated January 28, 2012, the site is fully developed and does not contain riparian vegetation or riverine habitat. Since the site is fully developed, there are no areas of suitable habitat for vernal pools or fairy shrimp. Based on the information provided by Brian W. Arnold, the project demonstrates compliance with Section 6.1.2 of the MSHCP. b. Section 6.1.4: To preserve the integrity of areas near the project site which are proposed Conservation Areas, the guidelines contained in Section 6.1.4 related to controlling adverse effects for development onal RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) JPR #: 11- 12 -15 -01 OnurvitIon Date: 2/2/12 uthortty rig *Wwddr Carly adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area should be considered by the Permittee in their actions relative to the project. Specifically, the Permittee should include as project conditions of approval the following measures: i. Incorporate measures to control the quantity and quality of runoff from the site entering the MSHCP Conservation Area. In particular, measures shall be put in place to avoid discharge of untreated surface runoff from developed and paved areas into MSHCP Conservation Areas. ii. The use chemicals or generation of bioproducts such as manure, which are potentially toxic or may adversely affect wildlife species, habitat or water quality shall not result in discharge to the MSHCP Conservation Area. The greatest risk is from landscaping fertilization overspray and run -off. iii. Night lighting shall be directed away from the MSHCP Conservation Area to protect species within the MSHCP Conservation Area from direct night lighting. Shielding shall be incorporated in project designs to ensure ambient lighting in the MSHCP Conservation Area is not increased. iv. Proposed noise generating land uses affecting the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate setbacks, berms or walls to minimize the effects of noise on MSHCP Conservation Area resources pursuant to applicable rules, regulations and guidelines related to land use noise standards. v. Consider the invasive, non - native plant species listed in Table 6 -2 of the MSHCP in approving landscape plans to avoid the use of invasive species for the portions of the project that are adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Considerations in reviewing the applicability of this list shall include proximity of planting areas to the MSHCP Conservation Areas, species considered in the planting plans, resources being protected within the MSHCP Conservation Area and their relative sensitivity to invasion, and barriers to plant and seed dispersal, such as walls, topography and other features vi. Proposed land uses adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area shall incorporate barriers, where appropriate in individual project designs to minimize unauthorized public access, domestic animal predation, illegal trespass, or dumping into the MSHCP Conservation Areas. Such barriers may include native landscaping, rocks/boulders, fencing, walls, signage, and/or appropriate mechanisms. Manufactured slopes associated with the proposed site development shall not extend into the MSHCP Conservation Area. 3 of 4 SNS /ST Sww glonal ons•rvatIon utlforlty pm 11Mnid� CwMy RCA Joint Project Review (JPR) INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 4 of 4 JPR #: 11-12-15-01 Date: 2/2/12 if 1 1 1 O D 0 2 1 , c' . . , -PA \- -„' ) r: - -, -- J — " ) , ,- -(--- 2 ,, - - - ----: -_,-- . .• . - -, ..___-- -- 1 . ( i I t „..,. `b--. „ i , , h (7 ",'-' --, --- - ----. t ' / : --}-•' i` , f -'' ', -J ' . ' .- • ' -? . w i rci -, - .-., '>.:".-• . r _: )I( L ':./ A k k k :r• '-' ; ' - 1:k.'k „.. i . . j .- A -, '::: 1 '.: 2 ,) c ,•, ,- , - , --- -J!, 1 . ', ' -7 C `-- - ------; )) y ,, -„,...); \ ,, 7- . ---) ; , .. . . _ - , • k r k t *: -1 .• A- 2 ,) \ ' ; 1 o 1 1 , 1/ ) „,, k C ' 7,A - , - < I _ \ / Co .) 11 i c i! latit. i z m :., NO31 I 1 i . g 1 1 A p WI ... 1 IAN= 1 •-/ k A _ „) ( j ,...: 1 1 r.'N '''''' - ;:. -.. _,-- i 7" / -- ..) . ___./ . ----'(2 4 -'.) ./ . i'l / ,S--■ t'i / il I • '.•''. 1 n , ' ....-- . 'r i D --- -1 __, (-) , ----. (-----, 7 (.4 7-----/ ) \ ......, ,____, ___,•-, •• . _. .Th.-1 ,,,, , ; r--• • ,, r „ -- „--„4. --- -- .-- ' __•, -, r ..- r -- --- - 1 Case No: Applicant: Proposal: Environmental: Case Planner: Place of Hearing: Date of Hearing: Time of Hearing: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below PA11 -0226 Lisa Fritzsching on behalf of Neighborhood Healthcare A Major Modification Application to allow for an additional 3,771 square feet to be added onto an existing vacant structure for the future Neighborhood Healthcare, located at 41840 Enterprise Circle North In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32 In -Fill Development) Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 City of Temecula, Council Chambers March 21, 2012 6:00 p.m. Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of the hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the City of Temecula Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project may be addressed to the case planner.