HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-56 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 92-56
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA DENYING APPEAL NO. 20, UPHOLDING
PLANNING COMM[qSION'S DECISION TO DENY PLOT
PLAN NO. 10605, AMENDMENT NO. 1, REVISED PERMIT
NO. 1 AND VARIANCE NO. 11 TO ALLOW A GRAVEL
PARKING LOT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MAIN
STREET, 100 FEET WEST OF MERCEDES.
WHEREAS, To-Mac Engineering filed Appeal No. 20 in accordance with the Riverside
County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by
reference;
WHEREAS, said APIx~ application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by
State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal on
June 23, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or
opposition to said Appeal; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TI~MECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
findings:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt
a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period
of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the
requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the
following requirements are met:
The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general
2. The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions,
including the issuance of building permits, each of the following:
Re,os 92-56 -1-
B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community
Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General
Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries
of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the
City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan.
Co
to wit:
The City Council in denying the Appeal, makes the following additional findings,
1. This request is inconsistent with Ordinance No. 348 in that the Ordinance
requires paved parking lots.
2. This request is inconsistent with City policies in that no other gravel parking
lot has been approved by the City.
3. Findings for a Variance can not be made in that the applicant has not
demonstrated a hardship other than economics.
Section II. Environmental Compliance. The City of Temecula City Council
hereby determines that Appeal No. 20 is a statutory exemption under CEQA pursuant to Section
15270(a) of the CEQA guidelines.
Section III. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 23rd day of June, 1992.
ATTEST:
J i City Clerk
[SEAL]
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
Resos 92-56 -2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE)
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 23rd day of June, 1992 by the
following vote:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Parks
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Resos 92-56 -3-