Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout92-62 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 92-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING APPEAL NO. 24, THEREBY APPROVING PLOT PLAN NO. 8839 REVISED NO. 1, AMENDED NO. 2, CHANGING USES ON THE SECOND FLOOR FROM 5,413 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE TO 3,600 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE AND 1,813 SQUARE FEET OF STORAGE ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 922-024-027. WHEREAS, Temecula Sixth Street-A Limited California Partnership filed Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WItl~JIEAS, said Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; Wi~gREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Plot Plan on March 16, 1992, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WBEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission denied said Plot Plan. Wltl~EAS, Appeal No. 24 was filed in the time and manner prescribed by state and local law pertaining to the Planning Commission's denial of Plot Plan No. 8839, Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2; WI~REAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal No. 24 at which time it was continued for sixty (60) days. WHEREAS, after sixty (60) days the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Appeal No. 24 on July 14, 1992 at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Appeal; and WIIERF. AS, the City Council received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Appeal; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEIVIECLILA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Rc~o92-62 -1- Section I. Findings. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. The City Council, in approving the appeal for the proposed Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. There is a reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 will be consistent with the City's future adopted General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law. Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 meets the parking standards as set out in the existing ordinances and anticipated in the General Plan. 2. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to and interference with the future General Plan, as a result of an approval. The project as conditioned is consistent with Ordinance No. 348 and the SWAP and therefore it is likely to be consistent with General Plan recommendations. 3. The proposed use or action complies with State planning and zoning laws. The project as conditioned is consistent with Ordinance No. 348. Parking requirements have been met as per Ordinance No. 348. 4. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the circulation patterns, access, and intensity of use. The site has access off Sixth Street and parking in the rear of the site will be accessible from the alley which will be improved to City Standards. 5. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare due to provision of adequate parking. The proposed uses will require forty (40) on-site spaces which are provided for. 6. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The alley would be improved to City standards, and therefore the utilization of the garage spaces will not be a burden to adjacent properties. 7. The design of the project, the type of improvements, and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed project. 8. Said findings are supported by minutes, maps and exhibits associated with these applications and herein incorporated by reference. This Staff Report contains mapping and Conditions of Approval, which support the Staff recommendation. B. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION III, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the Re~o92-62 -2- logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. Section II. F. nvironmental Com01iance. The proposed Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No. 2 is a Class 1 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15301 (e)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines which pertains to minor alterations to existing structures. Section Ill. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Plot Plan No. 8839 Revised No. 1, Amended No.2 to revise Plot Plan No. 8839, changing uses on the second floor from 5,413 square feet of storage to 3,600 square feet of office space and 1,813 square feet of storage and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 922-024-027. Section IV. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 14th day July, 1992. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: [SEAL] R~o92-62 -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) $S CITY OF TEMECULA ) I }tEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 14th day of July, 1992 by the following vote of the Council: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans ABSENT: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall S. Greek, City Cl~r-~ R~ao92-62 -4-