HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-020 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO. 94-20
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REGARDING THE APPEAL BY RAYMOND AND ODETTE DEROBERT
AND MICHF, I,I,E HAPlOT AND APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. 93-0179, AMENDMENT NO. 1.
WHEREAS, Raymond and Odette Derobert and Michelle Hapiot fried Planning
App~cafion No. 93-0179 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning
and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference;
~, said Planning Application was processed in the time and manner prescribed
by State and local law;
WItEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Planning Application on November
1, 1993, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons
had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons deserving to be heard, said Commission considered all facts
relating to Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved said
Planning Application;
WHEREAS, an appeal of the Planning Commission decision for conditions of approval
pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles was made in accordance
with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, and Planning Ordinances, which the City has
adopted by reference;
WHEREAS, said Appeal application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by
State and local law;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public heaxing pertaining to said Appeal on
December 14, 1993, at which time Staff was directed to prepare an Amendment to Section No.
18.28.A.C.(10) pertaining to the definition of all-weather access for emergency vehicles; and
Reaos 94-20 I
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly
noticed public heating as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, the City Council continued said Appeal until an Amendment to Section
18.28.a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348 came before them;
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said Appeal on January 11, 1994, at a duly
noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time interested persons had an opportunity
to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the appeal, the City Council considered the application De Novo;
A. The City Council, in approving of the proposed Planning Application, makes the
following findings, to wit:
1. The project is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements
of state law and local ordinances. The proposed project is consistent with Ordinance No. 348.
The project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of
Ordinance No. 348.
3. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is
compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. The
project meets the criteria prescribed under Section 18.28.a. (Second Unit Permit) of Ordinance
No. 348. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property, because it does
not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. The project
conforms with applicable land use and development regulations.
4. The proposed project will not have a significant impact on the environment
since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act.
B. As conditioned pursuant to Section 4, the Planning Application proposed conforms
to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future
development of the surrounding property.
94-20 2
Section 3. Environmental Comoliance. The proposed project will not have a significant
impact on the environment since the project is a Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning
Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. 1 to construct a second dwelling unit located at 31550
Calle Girasol and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 914-480-006 subject to the following
conditions:
A. Exhibit A, attached hereto.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of February, 1994.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
[SEAL]
Resos 94-20 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 22nd day of February, 1994 by
the following vote of the Council:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Mufioz, Parks, Stone
Roberts
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Greek, City Clerk
R¢~o~ 94-20 4
REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
IN 44 THRU 46
ARE ON FILE
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
]t:\STAPPRPT~ 179PA93 .CC3 2/10/94
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No.1 - Second Unit Permit
Project Description: A request to construct a new 2,195 square foot dwelling unit on
a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square foot structure. The new unit
will become the primary unit and the existing structure will become the secondary unit.
The project is located in the Rural Residential (R-R 2 1/2) zone. The project site is
located at 31550 Calle Girasol.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 914-480-006
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
The use hereby permitted by this Planning application is to construct a new 2,195
square foot dwelling unit on a parcel which already contains an existing 1,536 square
foot structure. The new unit will become the primary unit and the existing structure
will become the secondary unit.
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Temecula, its
agents, officers, and employees from any claims, action, or proceeding against the City
of Temecula or its agents, officers, or employees to attach, set aside, void, or annul,
an approval of the City of Temecula, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative
body concerning Planning Application No. 93-0179, Amendment No. I - Second Unit
Permit. The City of Temecula will promptly notify the permittee of any such claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of Temecula and will cooperate fully in the
defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the permittee of any such claim, action or
proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the permittee shall not, thereafter,
be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City of Temecula.
The second unit shall be used for family members or rental purposes only and may not
be sold as a separate unit unless the lot is subdivided pursuant to all applicable laws
and local ordinances.
The second unit shall be used as a dwelling unit only, and no businesses or home
occupations of any kind may be conducted from or in the second unit.
5. This approval shall be valid for five (5) years.
6. The project shall be consistent with Section 18.28.a of Ordinance No. 348.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with that as shown on
the site plan marked Exhibit A, or as amended by these conditions.
R:\STAFFRPT~I79PA93.CC3 2/10194 klb 8
8. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B.
Wood Siding: Earthenware (Frazee 5203 M)
Wood Trim: Candlewax (Frazee 4500 W)
Roof: Composition Shingle
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Seventy-Eight Dollars
($78.00) County administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California
Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within such forty-eight {48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check required
above, the approval for the project granted herein shall be voided by reason of failure
of condition.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
10.
Thc applioent shell oomply with Ordinanoc No. ~,,C3 by paying the foe required by that
ordinanoo whioh io based on (thc gro~s aarongo of the pareale propoood for
development). Should Ordinenoc No. C,63 be ouporsodod by the provision,3 of e I lebitot
Conservation trion prior to the payment of the fooo required by Ordinonoo Ne. C~3, the
applioant c~hall pay the foc required under the I labitot Conoorvation I~lan a=
implemented by County ordinanoc or rcsolution. {Deleted at the Planning Commission
hearing on November 1, 1993).
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
11.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
12.
The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1991 edition of the
Uniform Building, Plumbing and Mechanical; 1990 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Cable Title 24 Energy and Handicapped Regulations and the Temecuta
Code.
13. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
14.
The applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original
signature on plans submitted for plan review.
15.
The applicant shall provide electrical plan including lead calcs and panel schedule,
plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R:\STAFFRP'TX179PA93.CC3 2/10/94 IrJb 9
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
The following are the Department of Public Works Conditions of Approval for this project, and
shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true
meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the appropriate staff person of the Department
of Public Works.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site plan all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their
omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision.
General Requirements
16.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise (including all onsite flat work and
improvements) grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-
of-way.
17.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City
right-of-way.
18.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
19.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.
No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or
the project is shown to be exempt.
20. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Planning D~partment
Department of Public ~.,,orks
Riverside County Health Department
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
21.
A Grading Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the
Department of Public Works. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code,
Chapter 70, City Standards, and as required in these Conditions of Approval.
R:~STAFFRP~i79PA93.CC3 2/10/9~ ki~ 1 0
22.
A Soils Report prepared by a registered Soils Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
23.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weedfree condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
24.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area
Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is
payable to Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District prior to
issuance of any permit. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has been
already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
25.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
26.
A drainage easement shall be obtained from the affected property owners for the
release of concentrated or diverted storm flows onto the adjacent property. A copy of
the drainage easement shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for
review prior to recordation. The location of the recorded easement shall be delineated
on the precise grading plan.
27.
The Developer shall accept and properly dispose of all off-site drainage flowing onto
or through the site. In the event the Department of Public Works permits the use of
streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Section Xl of Ordinance No. 460 will
apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity, or use of streets be prohibited
for drainage purposes, the Developer shall provide adequate facilities as approved by
the Department of Public Works.
28.
The Developer shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration
of the drainage patterns; i.e., concentration or diversion of flow. Protection shall be
provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities, including enlarging existing
facilities or by securing a drainage easement.
29.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to
the subject property.
Prior to the Issuance of Encroachment Permits
30.
All necessary grading permit requirements shall have been accomplished to the
satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
R:~STAFFRF~I?gPA93.CC3 2/10/fl. E 11
31.
In lieu of the normal requirement to prepare a set of plan and profile improvement plans
as street right-of-way documents, Public Works Staff will accept grading plans with
the addition of a centerline profile and the necessary street specification. The plan and
profile shall show the location of existing utilities and facilities within the right-of-way
as directed by the Department of Public Works.
32.
The Developer shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed
guaranteeing the construction of the following public and private improvements in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department
of Public Works.
A. Street improvements
B. Storm drain facilities
C. Sewer and domestic water systems
33. All required fees shall be paid.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
34. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following. agencies:
Riverside County Fire Department
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
35.
All necessary construction or encroachment permits have been
submitted/accomplished to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works.
36. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works
37.
All building pads shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and
elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction
and site conditions.
38.
The Developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as
established per acre/unit as mitigation for traffic signal impact.
39.
The Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities
imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility
mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. The fee to
be paid shall be in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. 'If an interim
or final public facility mitigat~:.n fee or district has not been finally established by the
date on which the Developer requests its building permit for the project or any phase
thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for payment of Public Facility fee,
a copy of which has been provided to the Developer. Concurrently, with executing
this Agreement, the Developer shall post a bond to secure payment of the Public
Facility fee. The amount of the bond shall be $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed
~ 10,000. The Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment
R:\STAFFR.F~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 ki~ 1 2
of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the
amount of such fees). By execution of this Agreement, the Developer will waive any
right to protest the provisions of this Condition, of this Agreement, the formation of
any traffic impact fee district, or the process, levy, or collection of any traffic
mitigation or traffic impact fee for this project; provided that the Developer is not
waiving its right to protest the reasonableness of any traffic impact fee, and the
amount thereof.
Prior to Issuance of Certification of Occupancy
40. The Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison
Southern California Gas
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
41.
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
standards, including but not limited to curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive
approaches, parkway trees, street lights on all interior public streets, signing, striping,
traffic signal interconnect, and traffic signals.
42.
Adequate right-of-way shall be dedicated along Jeffery Heights Road and Aussie
Avenue to provide for a 60 foot full width right-of-way including a cul-de-sac at their
tarmini and required corner property line cut off in accordance with City Standards.
An all-weather access shall be designed by a registered Engineer and
constructed to be consistent with Section 18.28a.c.(10) of Ordinance No. 348
as amended.
The driveway and the access to the site shall be designed and constructed
relative to the ultimate design of Aussie Avenue or Jeffery Heights including a
turn around at the terminus as directed by the Department of Public Works.
The improvements shall accommodate the natural drainage course crossing the
road. All necessary permits shall be obtained from appropriate agencies; i.e. the
Department of Fish and Game, Army Corps. of Engineers, and Regional Water
Quality Control Board, as deemed necessary by the Department of Public
Works.
43.
In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions,
such easements shall be obtained by the Developer; or, in the event the City is required
to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the
Developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such
easement at the Developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66462.5,
which shall be at no cost to the City.
R:\STAFFRY~I79PA93.CC3 2/10/94 kib '! 3
OTHER AGENCIES
44.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho
California Water District transmittal dated October 14, 1993, a copy of which is
attached.
45.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Health Department transmittal dated October 1, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
46.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Fire Department transmittal dated October 25, 1993, a copy of which is attached.
R:\$TA FF]/ls2~ ! 791mA93.CC3 2/10/94