HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-19 CC OrdinanceORDINANCE NO. 97-19
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA97-0160 AMENDING THE TEXT
WITHIN SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 199 TO REDUCE THE
DWELLING UNITS FROM 4,047 TO 3,922 UNITS, TO
ELIMINATE THE COMMERCIAL ACREAGE AT THE
NORTHWF3T CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD
AND MEADOWS PARKWAY, TO ADD AN
APPROXIMATELY 12.5 ACRE PARK AT THE SO~T
CORNER OF LA SERENA AND MEADOWS PARKWAY,
AND TO REVISE ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS, DESIGN
GUIDELINES, AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, ALL
WITHIN VILLAGE 'A~
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Public hearings have been held before the Planning Commission and City
Council of the City of Temecula, State of California, pursuant to the Planning and Zoning laws
of the State of California, and the City Code of the City of Temecula. The application land use
district is hereby approved and ratified as part of the Official Land Use map for the City of
Temecula as adopted by the City and as may be amended hereafter from time to time by the City
Council of the City of Temecula, and the City of Temecula Official Zoning Map is amended by
placing in affect the zone or zones as described in the above title.
Section 2. Notice of Adoption. Within 10 days after the adoption hereof, the City
Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it to be
posted in at least three public places in the City.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Environmental Impact Report No. 202 was
prepared for Specific Plan No. 199 and was certified by the Riverside County Board of
Supervisors. In conjunction with Amendment No. 2 to the Specific Plan, a number of additional
studies were undertaken to update and complement the original EIR. The additional studies, a
geotechnical study, traffic study and a Kangaroo Rat trapping and update study, confirmed the
validity of the original analysis.
It has been eleven (11) years since the original environmental analysis was
performed for this project. Therefore, Staff prepared another Initial Environmental Assessment
to examine the question of whether any impacts beyond those analyzed in the previous EIR and
subsequent studies would result from the proposed project, changes in circumstances, or new
information. In areas where there was a potential change in circumstances, specifically traffic,
Ords\97-19 I
noise, and lighting, staff requested additional information from the applicant. Based upon Staff's
analysis, the project is consistent with the information contained in the previously certified EIR.
Due to the limited scope of the proposed changes to the specific plan, there will be no effect
beyond that which was reviewed in the previous analysis.
Under California Public Resources Code Section 21166 and Section 15162
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, no additional EIR is required
unless additional impacts not previously considered, or substantial increases in the severity of
impacts, may result from: substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which would require a major revision in the EIR, or new information that could not
have been known at the time the EIR was prepared becomes available. None of these situations
has occurred; therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 4. ~
A. Planning Application No. PA97-0160 (Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No. 199) as proposed and conditioned is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the
community.
B. Planning Application No. PA97-0160 (Amendment No. 3 to Specific Plan
No. 199) is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's adopted General Plan.
C. The project is compatible with surrounding land uses. The project proposes
a reduction in the density and intensity of land uses. Ultimate development will be residential
development in an area that is comprised of a variety of residential neighborhoods.
D. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property
because it does not represent a significant change to the planned land use of the site and is
consistent with the overall concept of Specific Plan No. 199.
E. The amendment to Specific Plan No. 199 does not increase the impacts
associated with the development or the overall intensity of the development as analyzed in
Environmental Impact Report No. 202.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall
publish a summary of this Ordinance and a certified copy of the full text of this Ordinance shall
be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five days prior to the adoption of this Ordinance.
Within 15 days from adoption of this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall publish a summary of this
Ordinance, together with the names of the Councilmembers voting for and against the Ordinance,
and post the same in the office of the City Clerk.
0rds\97-19 2
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPI*;I}, by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of October, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
June"S.~Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 97-19 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the 7th day of October, 1997, and that therealter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Temecula on the 28th day of October, 1997 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS
Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall
NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS None
June S. Greek, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
0rds\97-19 3