HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-129 CC Resolution~LUTION NO. 97-129
A ~LUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-029g
(DEVF~IOPMENT I~LAN- APPEAL NO. 1), MODIFYING CONDITION OF
APPROVAL NO. 7 OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97~98
APPROVING A CHANGE TO THE ROOF MATERIAI~ FOR THE ARENA
AND DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0298
(DEV~IOPMENT Ia_.AN- APPEAL NO. 2), UI~OLDING THE PLANNING
COMMIgSION'S DECISION APPRO~G PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
PA97-0298 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
103,$64 SQUARE FOOT, 4,S00 SEAT ARENA AND ASSOCIATFD
IMPROVEMENTS (HARDSCAPE, PARKING, LANDSCAPING AND
ROADWAYS) AND AN AND ADDENDUM TO A PREVIOUSLY
CERTIF~!~ EIR FOR THE OLD TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT)
BASED UI~N THE ANALYSIS CONTAINFD IN THE STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ON FILE IN THE CITY
CLERK'S OFFICE.
WHEREAS, TEV, Inc. filed Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan)
in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan) was processed
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHERF_AS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA97-0298
(Development Plan) on October 6, 1997, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,
at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or in opposition;
WHEREAS, at the public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and
arguments, if any, of all persons desiring to be heard, the Commission considered all facts relating
to Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan);
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved
Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan);
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan - Appeal No. 1)
was filed on by TEV, Inc. on October 13, 1997, requesting additional design flexibility with
respect to the material for the roof of the arena;
R¢~o~\97o 129 I
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan - Appe~ No. 2)
was filed by Albert S. Pratt on October 13, 1997 requesting the City Council deny the approval
of the Planning Commission and require a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact
Report be prepared for the project;
WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to Planning
Application No. PA97~98 ~elopment Plan - Appeal No. 1) on November 18, 1997, at which
time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to Planning
Application No. PA97-0298; and
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff
Report regarding Planning Application No. PA97-0298;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
findings; to wit:
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
1. The Project has been the subject of extensive prior environmental review
and that no additional environmental review is needed for the following reasons:
A. On 1uly 13, 1995, following a duly noticed public hearing, the City Council of the
City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 95-49 entitled *A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CERTIFYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO.
95-0031 (FINAL ENVIRONMF~NTAL IMPACT REPORT) ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT
AND STATEMENTS OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION AND APPROVING THE
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED WEST
OF INTERSTATE 15, EAST OF THE CITY'S WES~ BORDER, SOUTH OF RANCHO
CALIFORNIA ROAD AND NORTH OF THE SANTA MARGARITA RIVER," certifying the
Environmenial Impact Report for the Westside Specific Plan and Planning Application No. PA95-
0003 (Westside Specific Plan) and changing the zone from R-A-20 (Residential Agricultural -
Twenty Acre Minimum Parcel Size) to S-P (Specific Plan) for the Property.
B. An amendment to the project was approved by the Planning Commission on March
18, 1996 and by the City Council on March 26, 1996, at which time a finding was made that no
further environmental review was required for the project;
C. The Staff of the Planning Depaxtment has prepared an Initial Environmental Study
(IF.S), dated September 17, 1997, analyzing the proposed Development Plan and the prior
environmental actions on the Project, which IES is incorporated herein by this reference.
Ro~os\97-129 2
D. An Initial Environmental Study (IF.S) was conducted to de~'mine if the project was
within the scope of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Old Town
Redevelopment Project (Planning Application No. PA95-0031). Based upon this analysis, staff
determined an Addendum to the previously certified EIR be prepared pursuant to Section 15164
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The Addendum was prepared
because changes and additions were necessary for the proj~, but none of the conditions described
in Section 15162 of the Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
Mitigation measures approved with the Old Town Redevelopment Project (Planning Application
No. PA95-0031) will apply to this project.
E. The proposed Development Plan incorporates the provisions of the City's General
Plan, the Westside Specific Plan, the current zoning regulations for the Property, the Mitigation
Plan of Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (Final Environmental Impact Report) and such other
ordinances, rules, regulations and official policies governing permitted uses, density, design,
improvement, development fees, and con--on standards applicable to the Property. All of the
components of the proposed Development Plan which might affect the environment were discussed
and analyzed in Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR). Minor changes to the project have
been reviewed and examined in an Addendum to Planning Application No. PA95-0031 (FEIR).
F. Based on the evidence in the record before it, and after careful consideration of the
evidence and the Addendum, the City Council hereby finds and determines that neither a
Subsequent EIR or a Supplemental EIR is required for the Development Plan pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21166, 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 15162 or 15163, based on the
following findings of the City Council:
1. The elements of the Project as described in the Development Plan were
contemplated and fully and properly analyzed in the EIR certified and approved by the City
Council on July 13, 1995 and the Addendum prepared for the Development Plan (Planning
Application No. PA97-0298).
2. There have been no subsequent changes to the Project which would require
major revisions of the previous FEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
3. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances
under which the Project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous FEIR
due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects.
4. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR
which would show or tend to show that the Project might have one or more significant effects not
discussed in the previous FEIR.
R~o~\97-129 3
5. There is no new information since the certification of the previous FEIR
which would show or tend to show that significant effects previously examined might be
substantially more severe than shown in the FEIR.
6. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would
show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternative previously found not to be feasible
would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the
Project.
7. There is no new information since the certification of the FEIR which would
show or tend to show that mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different
from those analyzed in the previous FEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment.
Section 2.
findings; to wit:
That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following
1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City. The project is
consistent with all City Ordinances including the City's General Plan and the Westside Specific
Plan.
2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety and general welfare. The project as proposed complies with all City
Ordinances and meets the standards adopted by the City of Temecula designed for the protection
of the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. ~ That the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves
Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan - Appeal No. 1), modifying Condition
of Approval No. 7 of Planning Application No. PA97-0298, to approve a change to the roof
materials for the Arena and denies Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan,
Appeal No. 2) and hereby upholds the Planning Commission's decision approving Planning
Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan) for the construction of a 103,564 square foot,
4,800 seat arena and associated improvements (hardscape, parking, landscaping and roadways)
and an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR for the Old Town Redevelopment Project based
upon the analysis contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth
on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference and made a part hereof
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
Resos\97-129 4
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 18th day of November, 1997.
Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97-129 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of November, 1997 by the following
vote, to wit:
AYES:
4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Birdsall
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Stone
June S. Greek~E
City Clerk
Resos\97-129 5
EXHIBIT "A"
CiTY OF TEMECULA
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan)
Project Description: The design and construction of a 103,564 square foot, 4,800 seat
arena and associated improvements (hardscape, parking, landscaping and roadways)
Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 940-310-013, 940-320-002 and 940-320-001
Approval Date: October 6, 1997
Expiration Date: October 6, 1999
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of
Hundred and F;f~y ~o;;ar ;~I ~ ~' fee, required by F;sh ~,~d
~0111~ bUUO ~bLIUII
.~,~, ~,~ ,h~ Seventy-Eight Dollars (t78.00) County administrative fee, to enable
the City to file the Noti~ of Determination for the Addendum to the EI~ for the Old
Town ~edevelopment Project required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(a)
and California Code of ~egulations Section 15075. ~ w~h;~, ~;~
p~r~od t,Se app:~car, t/d~v~:~r has ~o~ de:~v~r~d to the P:a~[r,~ D~pa~,~,~ th~ check
oo ,=~,,=~ o~.=, .h= ap~-~-a; for ~f,e p~oject ...... =boll b= void by ~eason of '-:'
u, an ~u , aimurn
, ,*,, ~,,,~ ~u~ SectiOn 71 q "-' Amended at the ~anning
· ~t~l ·
Commission hearing Oct~er 6, 1997.
General Requirements
,
The developer/applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City
and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees and
agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees and agents, to attack, set
aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or
any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning Planning Application
No. PA97-0298 (Development Plan). City shall promptly notify the developer/applicant
of any claim, action, or proceeding for which indemnification is sought and shall further
cooperate fully in the defense of the action.
.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter
diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated
by this approval.
R:~STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 11/7/97 klb 13
.
.
1
.
The development of the premises shall conform substantially with Exhibit D (Site Plan),
and approved with Planning Application No. PA97-0298, or as amended by these
conditions.
a.
Class II bicycle spaces shall be provided in accordance with the Westside
Specific Plan requirements.
b.
Handicapped parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with American with
Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements.
C.
A linkage to Old Town shall be provided as depicted on Exhibit D-1 and shall
meet all ADA requirements.
Building elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit E, or as amended by these
conditions.
Building color elevations shall conform substantially with Exhibit F, or as amended by
these conditions.
Colors and materials used shall conform substantially with Exhibit G (color and material
board), or as amended by these conditions.
Synthetic Stucco/Concrete (walls)
Synthetic Stucco/Concrete(accent)
Wood (trim applique)
Concrete (roof shingle)
Synthetic Stucco/Concrete (4" stripe)
Synthetic Stucco/Concrete (6"/10" stripe)
Synthetic Stucco/Concrete (12" stripe)
Concrete (textured panel)
Synthetic Stucco (8" stripe)
Concrete (textured band)
Wood (shutters)
Glass
Synthetic Stucco (8" cap stripe)
Concrete (42" high divider)
Wood (6'x6' column w/4'x4' strut)
Metal (roof)
Wood (8'x8' column w/accent trim)
Metal (door)
Synthetic Stucco (2" stripe)
Colors
Dunn-Edwards (Baja White: SP14)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Similar to Cedarlite Concrete Muirwood-Shake
Dunn-Edwards (Hickory: SP172)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Hickory: SP172)
Dunn-Edwards (Hickory: SP172)
Dunn-Edwards (Hickory: SP172)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74) & (Hickory: SP172)
Clear
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Cocoa: SP74)
Dunn-Edwards (Bone: SP112)
Dunn-Edwards (Hickory: SP172)
Dunn-Edwards (Baja White: SP12t)
Dunn-Edwards (Baja White: SP14)
R:~$TAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 11/"//9"/Idb 14
.
.
10.
11.
12.
Landscaping shall conform substantially with Exhibit H, or as amended by these
conditions.
ae
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the
satisfaction of the Planning Manager. If it is determined that the landscaping is
not being maintained, the Planning Manager shall have the authority to require
the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved
landscape plan.
b.
Landscaping south of First Street shall be consistent with the landscaping north
of First Street. Slopes to the west of the Western By-Pass Corridor shall be
planted and irrigated in a similar manner to those to the north of First Street.
Slopes on the east side of the Western By-Pass Corridor shall be planted and
irrigated in a similar manner to those to the north of First Street.
C.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit or the application submittal for Phase
II of development, whichever comes first, the applicant shall submit landscape
and irrigation plans for the parking lot areas immediately adjacent (to the south
and west) to the Phase II component (Rogersdale). Said plans shall provide
parking lot landscaping consistent with Section II.B.4.e. (Landscape
requirements) of the Westside Specific Plan.
de
Prior to transplanting any oak trees on the site, the applicant shall submit a
relocation plan prepared by a qualified arborist for review and approval by the
Planning Manager. Should the trees die after transplanting, the applicant shall
replace the dead trees with a minimum 48" box tree, the type of which is
approved by the Planning Manager. Added at the Planning Commission hearing
October 6, 1997.
Prior to any expansion to the seating capacity (above 4,800 seats) of the arena, or the
application submittal of Phase II of the project, whichever comes first, the applicant shall
submit three (3) copies of a parking study to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for review and approval. Said study shall analyze the adequacy of
existing parking facilities, the possibility and feasibility of reciprocal parking, and make
recommendations for the amount of additional parking which will be required to
accommodate the uses on-site.
The project shall comply with the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program adopted for the Old Town Redevelopment Project.
The project shall comply with the provisions contained within and the Conditions 6f
Approval for the Westside Specific Plan.
!n the event the applicant alters its constituency from that which comprises TEV, Inc.
as of the date of the resolution approving this project, the project approval shall be
reconsidered by the City Council for the purpose of ensuring the scope of development
remains consistent with the approval. Added at the Planning Commission hearing
October 6, 1997.
R:\STAFFR_l~298PA97.CCI 11/7/9/kib 15
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
13.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation), if applicable.
14.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, for all slope areas
created as a result of the grading operation, shall be submitted to the Community
Development Department - Planning Division for review and approval. All slope areas
to the east of the Western By-pass corridor shall be planted and irrigated in a manner
similar to those areas on the east side of the Western By-Pass Corridor on the approved
conceptual landscape plans. All slope areas to the west of the Western By-pass corridor
shall be planted and irrigated in a manner similar to those areas on the west side of the
Western By-Pass Corridor on the approved conceptual landscape plans. The location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. These plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the
total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be accompanied
by the following items:
a,
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan).
15.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Planning Manager to
guarantee the installation of plantings and irrigation for all slope areas in accordance
with the approved landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division.
16.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
17. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid.
18.
All slope landscaping and irrigation shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Plannir~g
Manager.
19.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval and shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing
fee. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be
shown. In addition, all major and minor entry features and monumentation and the
corner landscape and monumentation features shall be included on the plans. These
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall
identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. The plans shall be
R:\STAFFRPT~298PA9'7.CCI 11/7/97 klb 16
accompanied by the following items:
a.
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
c. Water usage calculations per Ordinance No. 94-22 (Water Efficient Ordinance).
d. Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the plan).
20.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development·
Prior to the Issuance of Occu~pancy Permits
21. Roof-mounted equipment shall be inspected to ensure it is shielded from ground view.
22.
All landscaped areas shall be planted in accordance with approved landscape, irrigation,
and shading plans.
23.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed and be in a
condition acceptable to the Planning Manager. The plants shall be healthy and free of
weeds, disease, or pests· The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in
good working order.
24.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space
at a minimum height if 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space
finished grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space
finished grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place,
at each entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches,
clearly and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles not displaying distinguishing placards or
license plates issued for physically handicapped persons may be
towed away at owner's expense· Towed vehicles may be
reclaimed at or by telephone
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
25. Bicycle racks shall be installed.
R:~STAFFRPT~9$PA9?.CC1 11/7/97 klb 17
26.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning to
guarantee the installation of plantings, walls, and fences in accordance with the
approved plan, and adequate maintenance of the Planting for one year, shall be filed
with the Community Development Department - Planning Division.
27. All major and minor entry features and monumentation shall be installed.
28.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
29.
The applicant shall demonstrate by submittal of a written report that all mitigation
measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Program have been satisfied for this
stage of the development.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
30.
Comply with applicable provisions of the 1994 edition of the California Building,
Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 1993 National Electrical Code; California
Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula
Municipal Code.
31.
Submit at time of plan review complete exterior site lighting plans in compliance with
ordinance number 655 for the regulation of light pollution.
32.
Obtain all building plan and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
33. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
34.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1994)
35.
Provide path of travel to all areas of the buildings including stage area and lower arena
floor.
36.
Provide conceptual seating plans for arena floor area and show exiting requirement from
lower area.
37.
Show handicap seating areas.
38.
Exit widths don"t comply with Uniform Building code, show compliance for complete
occupant load, which half of required load to go through main exits.
39. Provide exit widths and cross-aisle sizes for compliance with exiting requirements.
40. Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
41. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
R:\STAFFRPT~29gPA9'7.CCI 11/7/97 t~b 1 8
42. Show path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
43.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
44.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the
1994 edition of the Uniform Plumbing Code, Appendix C. Women's restrooms are
required to be equal to mens restrooms as per Appendix C of the Uniform Plumbing
code.
45. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
46.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
submitted for plan review.
47.
Provide electrical plan including load calcs and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and
mechanical plan for plan review.
48.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturers engineer are required for plan review submittal.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative site
plan all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
courses, and their omission will subject the project to further review and may require revision.
General Requirements
49.
A Grading Permit for rough and/or precise grading, including all onsite flat work and
improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way.
50.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior
to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
51.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be coordinated
for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site
and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
52.
All roadway, slope and utility easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for
dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons
such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the
Department of Public Works.
53. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
R:\$TAFFRPT~98PA97.CCI 11/"//97 klb 19
54.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the
construction of the following public/private improvements within 18 months in
conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department
of Public Works.
a.
b,
c.
d.
e.
fe
ho
Western Bypass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) from the intersection
of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor to intersect
the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive (including the bridge
crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and parkway improvements,
sidewalks, and street lights). Improvements may include, but are not limited to:
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
k.
Vincent Moraga Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension to south of its
current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect the
Western Bypass Corridor and restriping of the existing segment of Vincent
Moraga Drive to Rancho California Road to accommodate the proposed
improvements. Improvements may include, but are not limited to: pavement,
curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, traffic signals
and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
In relation to the above item, Ridge Park Drive "T" intersection configuration with
Vincent Moraga Drive. Improvements may include, but are not limited to:
pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing,
traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) extension from Pujol Street west to
intersect the Western Bypass Corridor. Improvements may include, but are not
limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights,
signing, traffic signals and other traffic control devices as appropriate.
vv,,,, the traffic -' .... proposed
I IVIIL
~ ~o~/W~~ Oyp~ C~~ ~~o~;~n. Deleted ~t the Planning
Oommission he~ring October ~ 1 ~.
Affect the full improvements of the Main Street extension from Pujol Street west
to the project site's proposed escalators for the pedestrian connection.
Amended at the Planning Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
Storm drain facilities within the road right-of-way.
Landscaping (slopes and parkways).
Erosion control and slope protection.
Sewer and domestic water systems located within the road right-of-way.
Deleted at the Planning Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
R:\STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 11/7/97 klb 20
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and
hydraulic calculations shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District for approval prior to the issuance of any permit.
A permit from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District is
required for work within their Right-of-Way.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Soils or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted
to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide
recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations
to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. The impact of the site to any flood
zone as shown on the FEMA flood hazard map and to any adjacent floodways and
necessary protection mitigation measures shall be identified. Adequacy of capacity of
existing and proposed downstream drainage facilities shall be verified. Any upgrading
or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access
easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the
Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
R:\STAFFRPT~98PA97.CCI 11/'7/97 ~ 21
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies-
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
City of Temecula Fire Bureau
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Cable TV Franchise
Caltrans
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
Fish & Game
Army Corps of Engineers
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for
offsite work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed free condition and shall be
either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures
as approved by the Department of Public Works.
A,~ Env[ronr~er, tal" .......... "'---- '""" ....
~.~,,,o,,o,,,,o ,~,,~, ~..~ shall be
e~v~ro~e~tal ~,,~,,,. o,,d .,,0,, b~ perrr, a~tly filed '--"~ th~ ~ff,~ of '~- ~:"
~,,~,,,~, ~ copy u, ~h~ - -" ~ ...............
loll
aad appr~va:. ~,0, Study ~,,~. ~for~at~or, sha:: be ~a the EC~ Deleted at the
Planning Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed "Western
bypass Corridor and Vincent Moraga Drive" in accordance with the Mitigation Monitoring
Program. The form of the offer shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer and
City Attorney.
R:\STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCl 1 I/7/9/klb 22
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
70.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
71.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
72.
The following criteria shall be observed in the design of the precise grading plans to be
submitted to the Department of Public Works:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
be
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A, 208,
and 401 (curb and sidewalk).
Ce
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with Ordinance No. 461 and shall be shown on the improvement
plans as directed by the Department of Public Works.
d.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed along public street frontages in
accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401.
e.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees or as
approved by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
g.
All concentrated drainage directed towards the public street shall be conveyed
through under-sidewalk drains.
73.
Private roads MUST be designed by the engineer of record, reviewed, and approved by
the Department of Public Works to meet City Public Road Standards or otherwise
approved by the Department of Public Works. This should include but may not be
limited to:
a.
Minimum paved road widths of 32 feet within adequate right-of-ways or
easements.
b. Knuckles being required at 90° 'bends' in the road.
C,
d.
Separation between on-site intersections shall meet current City Standards.
Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City Standards.
R:~STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 11/7/97 Idb 23
e. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required.
f,
90° parking immediately adjacent to the private streets shall be located a
minimum safe distance from intersections.
g. All intersections shall be perpendicular (90°).
Amended at the Planning Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
74.
Concentrated on-site runoff shall be conveyed in concrete ribbon gutters or underground
storm drain facilities to an adequate outlet as determined by the Department of Public
Works.
75.
Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department
and the Department of Public Works for review and approval.
76.
V~h,~lo, o~o~-~-" .............. '
~11OII I~[11D[~U O~ VlII~11[ I~lUIg~g ~11V~t
-- ~ ": ~ ....... ~- ~ ~-- -~ ....... ~ - -- ~ .......... Deleted the Planni g
Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
77.
The Developer shall provide bus bays and shelters within the Specific Plan. Location
and number of bus bays shall be subject to approval of the City and Riverside
Transportation Agency (RTA). If required additional rights-of-way dedications associated
with bus bays shall be provided by the Developer.
78.
This development must enter into an agreement with the City for a "Trip Reduction
Plan" in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-01.
79.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code
and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
80.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
81.
A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) shall be prepared by
the Developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer, and City
attorney. The CC&R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any
record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto,
and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by
the City and recorded. The CC&R's shall be submitted to the following Engineerir{g
conditions:
a. The CC&R's shall be prepared at the Developer's sole cost and expense.
b,
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of
Planning, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions
as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect
the interest of the City and its residents.
R:\STAFFRPT~295PAg?.CCI 11/'7/97 klb 24
Ce
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association
are subject to the approval of Planning, Department of Public Works, and the
City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A
recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
d.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and
related facilities.
e.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the Owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
All parkways, open areas, on-site slopes and landscaping shall be
permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to
the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to Planning
and the Department of Public Works prior to issuance of building permits.
ii.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring
access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking
areas shall be provided by CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded
concurrent with the map, or prior to the issuance of building permit
where no map is involved.
82.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
83.
The Developer shall complete the following infrastructure improvements prior to
issuance of any occupancy:
Western Byeass Corridor (88 feet full width right-of-way) shall be constructed
from the intersection of Front Street and State Route 79 South/Western BypaSs
Corridor to intersect the (proposed) southerly extension of Vincent Moraga Drive
(including the bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek, landscaped median and
parkway improvements, sidewalks, and street lights).
Vincent Moraga Drive (78 feet full width right-of-way) shall be extended south
of its current intersection (existing terminus) with Ridge Park Drive to intersect
the Western Bypass Corridor. The existing segment of Vincent Moraga Drive to
Rancho California Road shall be restriped to accommodate the proposed
improvements.
R:\STAFFRFr~98PA97.CCI 11/7/97 klb 25
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
In relation to the above item, Ridoe Park Drive shall form (be reconstructed to
form) a "T" intersection with Vincent Moraga Drive.
First Street (78 feet full width right-of-way) from Pujol Street shall be extended
west to intersect the Western Bypass Corridor.
A traffic signal warrant analysis (utilizing criteria established by the State of
California Department of Transportation) indicates that the First Street/Western
Byeass Corridor intersection shall be signalized. It is recommended, therefore,
that traffic volumes be monitored at this location to determine the precise
scheduling of this installation by the Developer. Moreover, when constructed
this traffic signal shall be interconnected with the traffic signal proposed at the
Front Street/State Route 79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection.
A traffic signal at the First Street/Western Bypass Corridor intersection and
interconnection with the traffic signal proposed at the Front Street/State Route
79 South/Western Bypass Corridor intersection. Added at the Planning
Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
The Developer shall affect construction of ~ full improvements of the Main
Street extension from Pujol Street west to the project site's proposed escalators for the
pedestrian connection. Amended at ~e Planning Commission hearing October 6, 1997.
Sufficient parking for and a local transit system shall be provided to satisfy the parking
demands of the project. Amended at the Planning Commission hearing October 6,
1997.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City Standards and in compliance with the site traffic impact analyses, including but not
limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, drainage
facilities, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets to the satisfaction
of the Director of Public Works.
All traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping shall be installed
per the approved traffic signal, traffic signal interconnection and signing and striping
plan, respectively.
The Developer shall provide "stop" controls at the intersection of local streets with
arterial streets as directed by the Department of Public Works.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersection and adjaceht
to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance as directed by the Department of
Public Works.
All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the Department of Public Works.
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required .by .the Department of Public Works.
R:\STAFFRPT~295PA97.CC1 11/7/97 klb 26
92.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
Rancho California Water District
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
93.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Department of Public
Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
94.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy and use and
Uniform Building Code (UBC), Uniform Fire Code (UFC), and related codes which are in
force at the time of building plan submittal.
95.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per UFC Appendix Ill.A, Table A-Ill-A-1. The
developer shall provide or show there exists a water system capable of delivering 2500
GPM for a 2 hour duration at 20 PSI residual operating pressure. The required fire flow
may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction
type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
(UFC 903.2, Appendix Ill.A)
96.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per UFC
Appendix Ill.B, Table A-Ill-B-1. A combination of on-site and off-site super fire hydrants
(6" x 4" x 2-2 ½" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access roads and
adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart and shall be
located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access
road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any
adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. (UFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix Ill-B)
97.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
98.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall ha~e
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads
are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface
for 70,000 lbs GVW. (UFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
99.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 70,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. ( UFC sec 902 and Ord 95-15)
R:\STAFFRFI~298PA97.CCI 11/7197 klb 2 7
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen
(13) feet six (6)inches. (UFC 902.2.2.1 and Ord 95-15)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (UFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review. Plans shall be: signed by a
registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and
conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the
plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants
shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible
building materials being placed on an individual lot. (UFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and
National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (UFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, all commercial buildings
shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the building.
The numerals shall be minimum twelve (12) inches in height for buildings and six (6)
inches for suite identification on a contrasting background. In strip centers, businesses
shall post the suite address on the rear door(s). (UFC 901.4.4 and Ord 95-15)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval
prior to installation. (UFC Article 10, UBC Chapter 9 and Ord 95-15)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(UFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. The Knox-Box shall be supervised
by the alarm system. (UFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (UFC 902.4)
R:\STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 1 i///97 [lb 28
OTHER AGENCIES
109.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District's's transmittal dated September 18,
1997, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County
Flood Control Water District' by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the
issuance of permits, based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee.
110. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California
Water District's transmittal dated September 4, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
111. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Riverside Transit
Agency transmittal dated September 12, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
112. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal
Water District transmittal dated September 12, 1997, a copy of which is attached.
113.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated September 3, 1997,
a copy of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Department approval.
Applicant Name
R: ~STAFFRPT~298PA97.CCI 11/7/97 klb 2 9
· E,£F' -- °OT' 0£':
DA Vl D P. ZA PPE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
City of Te_mecu~a
Plantting Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 9259o
I~dies ~nd Gentlemen:
RIV£E~.~,',~E. CA 92S01
909/275-1200
909/'/$$-9965 FAX
7829.1
The I:)~a'ict does not nonnm~ . .mcon'~c~... a:mdmone ~ mm~ dt, d~:ms aromer rams ~ c~,e~ in irmorporat.~ ~es.
The Dislzl~ el~ aoee nat I~n ~.ei~Y laml ?.__?~,___ at__~ ~ Dlvimn m' Real Estate.._ .~ ~ .o~.er_nooo.
inspection will be reclU;red for ~ ac~. ~ ehed~ Ifi~ Ina aammm'a~.e roes m, ~e
requirKl~ .
~u~ed for C~smct mm~nnm. I=m me~ ropemort ams adminm*a~ted.
. ~/~lS I)ralec~ is ~ within tt~e Ilmitl af Itte DIsI~S~ CiCA .area_
GENERAL 1NF_O RMA'~lON
_This project_ ffmy .mq_ ulm · Netlonal Pallulnnt ~ E]inin~ ~ (NPDE6) . .l~-.~mlt.fromthe. _8!~_..~ Water
If t~ir~ involves $ Federal Emerge~. I~~ment Agenay (FEMA.) mapp~_ ~ plain, men 'me
requirements, '~cl should t~..11t~_ re~l. uim ~
If a natural watercourse or m~ped fkxx! plain is Iml~eted ~ ~ IXOjeet ~ City should req.uire the applicant. to
obtain a ,Section 160111603 A~mement from the California ~~t af Fan and Oeme aria a Olean .Wa.t. er.,/~ct
8ecx~ 404 Pemit ~m the U.S. Army, Corm of Enalneem, e'~ .__.,~ from Itmee.. _..~ Inchtang
the proje~. is exempt'from these ~uirementt A~ Water Act ~ 401 Water O~ .t~y C~'rtBc~on may ~
· required from ~e Ic~al California Regional Water QUality Comml Bcard prior to iseuan~ of Itie Corps 404 permit
Ven/truly yours,
STUART E,. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
September 4, 1997
Mr. Matthew Fagan, Associate Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
~,0;I I'tJ .(
Michael R. McMillan
Csaba F. Ko
Ralph H. D~ily
Lisa D. Herman
Doug Kulberg
Jeffrey L. 5ginkler
George M. ~'oods
· John F, Hennigar
Generul .Manager
Phillip L. Forhe~
~rcclnr nl Fmnncc-
Treas~rer
Kenneth C. Oealy
DI rector -I ( )pt,rnl
Perry R, Louck
('onl r. ilc'r
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY, PARCELS 23, 24, AND 25 OF
PARCEL MAP 18254, APNS 940-3'10-013, 940-320-001, AND
940-320-002, PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA97-0298
Dear Mr. Fagan:
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
This development may require the relocation of existing RCWD water facilities
and the construction of additional water facilities to provide domestic and fire
protection service for this development. The relocation of existing RCWD
facilities and the construction of new facilities will be the responsibility of the
developer.
When domestic and fire protection services are determined, the customer will
Lind. M.~'re.o.~o need to contact RCWD for fees and requirements.
[)~t r'rCt ~t.t'i'~'Lar".' .Adlltlni.~l rat%l~,',.·
%crx'Jc~.~ M.na~e~
~.~,,.~..,~o.~,, ...Water availability would be contingent upon the prope~y owner signing an
Best g Krieger
';"'~ .......'Agency Agreement which assigns water management rights, if any, to
RCWD.
if' you have any questions, please contact
Representative at this office.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
97/SB:eb 168/F012/FC F
c: Laurie Williams, Engineering Services Supervisor
an Engineering Services
It.,~cho C:,llfornia Water Oistrlct
September 12, 1997
Mr. Matthew Fagan
City of Temecula Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 9,.,90
Riverside Transit Agency
............. .:':.. 1825 Third Street
P.O. Box 59968
.~ Riverside, CA 92517
Phone: (909) 684-0850
Fax: (909) 684-1007
RE: Planning Application No. PA97-0298
Dear Mr. Fagan:
RTA recommends moving the transit stop facility, located near the proposed First street. further
away from the intersection. A 40-foot transit vehicle requires a minimum of 140 feet and
preferably 160 feet after a turn for a bus stop zone on the far-side of the intersection. This allows
the vehicle to clear the intersection.
In addition, RTA recommends relocating the second transit stop facility, located near the arena
bus and employee parking, from the northeast to the southeast comer. We are concerned about
the safety of the bus stopping and disabled passengers boarding and alighting on a 4.5% grade.
If you have questions or comments, please call. Enclosed are copies of text and diagrams from
RTA's Design Guideline.
Sincerely,
Anne MacCracken
Transit Planner
AM:cam
enclosure
CC'
Stephen C. Oiler,
Director of Operations &
Resource Development
When a large percentage of passengers using a stop are destined for a
single trip generator (a school, office, shopping center or similar
generator), the stop should be located to minimize pedestrian activity
through the intersection. Depending on the location of the generator, the
preferred stop could be farside (Figure 6) or nearside (Figure 7B).
District staff should be consulted whenever special circumstances regarcling bus
stop placement arise. Bus stop zones can usually be accommodated on-street in the
parking or curb lane, bike lane, or in right-turn lanes (see Figure 8). In cases where
there are no parking or right-turn lanes, or where traffic speeds or bus volumes are
high, a bus turnout may be necessary (see discussion under Bus Turnout).
Complimentary stops for both directions of travel and crosswalks at intersections
must also be provided on two-way streets.
Deslan Criteria: For 40-foot transit vehicles, bus stop zones for nearside and
farsic~e stops should be a minimum of 115 feet long and preferably 160 feet long.
Bus stop zones for mid-block stops should be a minimum of 130 feet long and
preferably 170 feet long. Sidewalks and wheelchair access ramps should be
provided at all stops. For articulated bus stop zones, the bus berth position should
be 70 feet long (as compared to 50 feet for. the 40-foot vehicle), thereby increasing
the overall length of the zone by 20 feet. These dimensions for bus stop zones are
illustrated in Figure 9.
At some bus stops, more than one vehicle may be at the stop at a given time. Figure
10 provides a sample of how two or three buses could be accommodated at a single
stop. Distdct staff are available to determine whether single or multiple berths are
required at a given stop.
The curb adjacent to the bus stop zone should be painted red and signs posted to
clearly identify the area as no parking or. stopping except for buses. A solid white 6 -
8 inch lane line separating the bus stop from adjacent traffic lanes and/or "Bus Stop"
pavement stencils should be provided in areas of heavy congestion.
Where possible, or necessary due to high traffic volumes, bus stops should be
accompanied by co~icrete pads to reduce lung term maintenance costs. A typical
concrete pad cross section is shown in Figure 11.
A number of passenger amenities are typically provided at bus stops and should be
arranged to maximize passenger convenience and minimize disruption to pedestrian
flow adjacent to the stop. A typical layout is shown in Figure 12. .
The front or rear door of many 40-foot transit coaches is equipped with a drop-down
wheelchair lift that allows wheelchair passengers to safely and easily board RTA
buses. To ensure that sufficient clearance is provided to allow wheelchair patrons to
maneuver and enter or exit these lifts safely, special attention should be made to
provide a clear zone in the vicinity of the doom on the coaches. Figure 13 details the
clearance zone necessary for safe use of these wheelchair lifts. The "kneeling"
feature on the front end of many buses, which reduces the step height for mobility
impaired patrons, requires no special bus stop design features to operate.
20
i i i i1,1 i i ii ii
MID-BLOCK STOP
I III I I I
[
FARSIDE STOP
II
90'
It#l, l~lrll
I I II I I · I
ill Stll Sldll
NEARSIDE
strlet160' dolirabio foc high ~
high volume streets
STOP
"This SO' berth is foc a single large 40' long vehicle.
For Itticul~ed vehicles, a 70' berth is necessary.
These dimension. are for ~e b~ ~=n one;
ff m~e ~d~ ~e ~=r~ ~ a stop, ~ F~ure
10 on ~ tO ~e the ~ ne~ for mu~iple
NOT TO SCALE
FIGURE 9
DIMENSIONS FOR
ON.STREET BUS STOPS
22
i I
a
z
:~0
I
I
I
! .
!
!
&
!
!
I
,8
i rmmmmlmmlmmmmmms '-~
.01,
~6
O0
O~
m
John B. Brudin
Redwine a~d Shetrill
Dire~or e/The Men'ep~n ~ter
Di, tr,c~ of Sou,he., Ca//firn/a
Chester C. Gilbert
Jor~'ph J. !(uebicr. CPA
September 12, 1997
Riohard R. Hall. P,esidem
David J. $1a~,,on. Wee Presidem
Marion V. Ashley
Clayton A. Record, Jr.
Ro~¢e D. Sicres
Secretary
Mary' C. White
Matthew Fagan
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
SUBJECT: Westside SP/Old Town Temecula Entertainment Center -Wild
Wes t Area
(PA97-0298)
Dear Mr. Fagan:
We have reviewed the materials transmitted by your office
describing a proposal to construct a 103,564 square foot, 4,800
seat arena and associated improvements (hardscape, parking,
landscaping and roadways). The subject project is indicated to be
located west of Old Town temecula (100 feet west of Pujol Street),
700 feet south of Ridge Park Drive/Vincent Moraga Drive and east of
the City's western border, within the Westside Specific Plan.
Please be advised the proposed project is located within Eastern
Municipal Water District for sewer service. The provisions of
service are contingent upon the timing of the subject project and
status of the District's permit to operate. The developer must
contact the District's Customer Service Department for plan of
service, plan check, connection fees and agreement for service.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at (909) 766-1810,
extension 4467.
Sincerely,
Warren A. Back
Civil Engineer
Customer Service Department
WA /
Mail to: Post Office Box 8300 · 5an Jacinto, California 92581-8300 · Telephone (909) 925-7676 · Fax (909) 929-0257
Main Office: 2045 S. San Jacinto Avenue, San Jacinto · Customer Service / Engineering Annex: 440 E. Oakland Avenue, Hemet, CA
Operations & Maintenance Center: 2270 Trumble Road, Pettis, CA 92571 · Telephone (909) 928-3777 · Fax (909) 928-6177
TO:
FROM
RE:
o
County of Riverside
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DATE: September 3, 1997
·
CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ATTN: Matthew Fagan
GREGOR DELLENBACH, Environmental Health Specialist
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. PA97-0298
Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit No. PA97-0298
and has no objections.
2. PRIOR TO PLAN CHECK SUBMITTAL ISSUANCE'
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2.
GD:dr
(909) 285-8980