HomeMy WebLinkAbout121213 PTS Agenda I\
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act,if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,please contact the
office of the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable
arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting[28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
MEETING AGENDA
TEMECULA PUBLICITRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
A REGULAR MEETING
TO BE HELD AT
TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2013, 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Carter
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Coram
ROLL CALL: Coram, Cosentino, Hagel, Youmans, Carter
PRESENTATIONS:
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of fifteen minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on
items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire
to speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow"Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a"Request to Speak"form must be filed with the Recording Secretary
before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three minute time limit for individual speakers.
COMMISSION REPORTS
Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not
to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by
one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1. Action Minutes of October 24, 2013
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of October 24, 2013.
1
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2. Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to preside through the 2014 calendar
year.
3. Traffic Conditions on Margarita Road —Santiago Road to Pio Pico Road
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Concur with the results of the guardrail evaluation that there are no special
circumstances that justify the need for a guardrail on Margarita Road.
3.2 Provide further direction to Staff regarding the use of curve warning signs on
Margarita Road.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers,
41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet(including staff reports)will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(41000 Main Street,
Temecula)after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting. At that time,the agenda packet may also be accessed on the
City's website—www.cityoftemecula.org—and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting,
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda,after the posting of the agenda,will be
available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center(4 1000 Main Street,Temecula,8:00 AM—5:00 PM). In addition,
such material may be accessed on the City's website—www.cityoftemecula.org—and will be available for public review at the respective meeting.
Ifyou have any questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting,please contact the Public Works Department at the Temecula Civic Center,
(951)694-6411.
2
ITEM NO. 1
Action Minutes of
October 24, 2013
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA PUBLICITRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TEMECULA CIVIC CENTER, CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2013, 6:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Person Carter
FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Cosentino
ROLL CALL: Coram, Cosentino, Hagel, Carter
Absent: Commissioner Youmans
PRESENTATIONS: Traffic Enforcement Update, Lt. Greg Negron, Temecula Police Department
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Josaline Cuesta
Shawn Strickland
COMMISSION REPORTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Action Minutes of September 26, 2013—Approved staff recommendation—(3-0-1-1).
Commissioner Hagel made the motion; it was seconded by Commissioner Cosentino
and voice vote reflected unanimous approval'with the exception of Chairperson Carter
who abstained and Commissioner Youmans who was absent.
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of September 26, 2013.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
'2. Reschedule Commission Meetings of November and December 2013—Approved staff
recommendation — (4-0-1). Commissioner Cosentino made the motion; it was
seconded by Commissioner Hagel and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with
the exception of Commissioner Youmans who was absent.
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Direct Staff to cancel and reschedule the regular meetings for November and
December 2013, and perform the appropriate postings and noticing requirements
per the Government Code.
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
FIRE CHIEF'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:55 P.M.Commissioner Cosentino moved,seconded by Commissioner Hagel,to adjourn
the Temecula Public/Traffic Safety Commission Meeting to Thursday, December 12,2013,at
6:00 P.M. at Temecula Civic Center, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula,
California.
Robert Carter Amer Attar
Chairperson Acting City Engineer
2
ITEM NO. 2
Election of Chairperson
and
Vice-Chairperson
AGENDA REPORT
TO: P lic/Traffic Safety Commission
�l;983
FROM: Amer Attar, Acting City Engineer
DATE: December 12, 2013
SUBJECT: Item 2
Election'of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson
Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Elect a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson to preside through the 2014 calendar year.
BACKGROUND: Annually,the Commission elects a member to serve as Chairperson and
Vice-Chairperson. The appointment to the position becomes effective at the meeting of January 23,
2014. The newly elected Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson will preside through the 2014 calendar
year.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
ITEM NO. 3
Traffic Conditions on Margarita Road —
Santiago Road to Pio Pico Road
AGENDA REPORT
5A
,1
a-
TO: ublic/Traffic Safety Commission
° 1989
FROM: mer Attar, Acting City Engineer
DATE: December 12, 2013
SUBJECT: Item 3
Traffic Conditions on Margarita Road — Santiago Road to Pio Pico
Road
Prepared By: Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer- Traffic
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Concur with the results of the guardrail evaluation that there are no special circumstances that
justify the need for a guardrail on Margarita Road.
2. Provide further direction to Staff regarding the use of curve warning signs on Margarita Road.
BACKGROUND: At the meeting of October 24, 2013, Mr. Shawn Strickland, expressed
concerns about traffic conditions on Margarita Road and requested that the Public/Traffic Safety
Commission explore the feasibility of installing a guardrail on the west side of Margarita Road to
mitigate private property damage caused by vehicular collisions. The public has been notified of the
Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the agenda notification
process. Mr. Strickland was notified by mail.
Margarita Road is classified as a Major Arterial on the City's Circulation Element of the General
Plan, which accommodates a raised median, two (2)travel lanes and a bike lane in each direction.
Currently, Margarita Road is striped for two (2)travel lanes in each direction, a painted median and
a bike lane on both sides of the roadway. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on Margarita Road is
16,500 ADT north of Jedediah Smith Road. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita
Road.
In November 2013, a review of conditions was performed, which included an evaluation of the
horizontal and vertical roadway alignment, intersection sight distance, and a review of the collision
history.
The collision history reviewed for the five (5) year period from November 1, 2008 to October 31,
2013, indicates that there were six reported collisions on Margarita Road between Santiago Road
and Pio Pico Road. The history indicates that vehicle right-of-way violation and driver inattention
were the primary cause of all six collisions. None of the collisions were attributed to the horizontal or
vertical alignment of the roadway.
Since the majority of collisions were attributed to right-of-way violations, an evaluation of intersection
sight distance was performed on Margarita Road at San Fermin Place and Jedediah Smith Road to
determine if there were any visibility constraints at these intersections. The evaluation revealed the
following:
• Margarita Road at San Fermin Place—The sight distance evaluation determined the visibility is
appropriate for conditions and speeds at this location. The evaluation indicates the sight
distance is approximately 700 feet looking north and 800 feet looking south from San Fermin
Place. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 360 feet is required for the 45 MPH posted
speed limit on Margarita Road.
• Margarita Road at Jedediah Smith Road—The sight distance evaluation determined the visibility
is appropriate for conditions and speeds at this location. The evaluation indicates the sight
distance is approximately 1,000 feet looking north and 800 feet looking south from Jedediah
Smith Road. A minimum unobstructed sight distance of 360 feet is required for the 45 MPH
posted speed limit on Margarita Road.
A review of the Margarita Road street improvement plans was performed to determine the design of
the roadway alignment between Santiago Road and Jedediah Smith Road. In 1978,the County of
Riverside approved the street improvement plans for construction of the west side of Margarita Road
in conjunction with the construction of Santiago Estates, Tract Map 9833-2. In 1991, the City of
Temecula approved the street improvement plans for construction of the east side of Margarita
Road in conjunction with the construction of Paloma Del Sol, Tract Map 24135-1. The approved
plans indicate the vertical alignment of Margarita Road between Santiago Road and Jedediah Smith
Road varies between a 6.60% and 6.92% grade. Additionally, the plans show a 2,000 foot
(horizontal) radius curve on Margarita Road between Santiago Road and Jedediah Smith Road.
The design requirements for a Major Arterial, such as Margarita Road, are defined in the City and
County Roadway Design Requirements shown in the tables below.
City of Temecula RoadwayDesi n Re uirements
Ma"or Arterial Flat Rolling Mountainous
Preferred Radii Horizontal 2000' 1600' As Approved by Director of Public Works
Maximum Grade % 3 6 9
Design Speed 55 55 As Approved by Director of Public Works
County of Riverside Roadway Design Re uirements
Major Highway Flat Rolling Mountainous
Preferred Radii Horizontal 1900" 1400' As Approved by Director of Transportation
Maximum Grade % 3 6 9
Design Speed 55 50 As Approved by Director of Transportation
Since this area of Margarita Road is primarily rolling terrain, the roadway alignment was designed
using the "rolling" terrain criteria. Based on the review of the improvement plans and roadway
design requirements, it is Staff's opinion that Margarita Road was constructed in conformance with
the design standards for major arterial (highway) as required by the County of Riverside (in 1978)
and the City of Temecula.
As mentioned, a request was received to consider the feasibility of installing a guardrail on Margarita
Road to mitigate potential damage to private property caused by vehicular collisions. The City of
Temecula utilizes the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) guidelines when
considering the installation of traffic control devices and other traffic safety systems, such as
guardrails. The Traffic Manual indicates that guardrails are typically installed to reduce the severity
of run-off-road collisions at locations where there is a severe elevation difference(embankment)or
to shield fixed objects. The Traffic Manual has established the following criteria,which may be used
when considering the installation of a guardrail at fixed objects or embankments. This criteria was
used to evaluate the need for a guardrail on Margarita Road.
1. Collision History: Based upon the run-off-road collision history, statistical experience or
analysis can be used to predict if guardrail is a potential solution to reducing the severity of
a collision at a particular roadway segment.
2. Roadway Alignment: Isolated curves on relatively straight roadway alignment may increase
the risk of running off road. Also, on roads with curving alignment, curves that are sharper
than expected may increase the probability for run-off-road collisions.
3. Operating Conditions: The location's traffic characteristics can also affect the potential for a
vehicle to leave the traveled way:
a. Volume: The higher the volume of traffic, the greater the potential for run-off-road collisions.
b. Speed of Traffic:Higher operating speed can increase the potential run-off-road collisions,
and will affect the distance that a vehicle will traverse before a driver can regain control or
bring the vehicle to a stop.
4. Climate Conditions: Frequent dense fog, rain or snow and ice conditions increase the
risk of run-off-road collisions.
5. Roadside Recovery Area: The risk of a runoff-road vehicle colliding with an embankment
or a fixed object is greater as the recovery area decreases.
The evaluation performed indicates that the criteria for consideration of a guardrail was not satisfied.
The collision history along Margarita Road indicates that the majority of collisions are attributed to
right-of-way violations or driver inattention and are not the type of collision that can be corrected by
the installation of a guardrail. Additionally, the roadway design complies with current design
standards and there are no existing conditions that may increase the probability for run-off-road
collisions. Moreover, the prevailing speed of traffic on Margarita Road is 48 MPH, which is
significantly lower than the 55 MPH design speed used to determine the horizontal and vertical
alignment of the roadway. The lower prevailing speed of traffic reduces the potential for run-off-road
collisions. Based on the results of the guardrail evaluation, it is Staffs opinion that there are no
special circumstances that justify the need for a guardrail on Margarita Road. Therefore, Staff
recommends no further action on this item.
Although the results of our evaluation indicate the roadway alignment of Margarita.Road is properly
designed, a Curve Warning sign could be used to advise unfamiliar motorists of the change in
roadway alignment and the presence of multiple curves on the southbound. and northbound
segment of Margarita Road between Santiago Road and Pio Pico Road. The Caltrans Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans MUTCD) allows the flexibility to exercise engineering
judgment when using this sign. Staff recommends the Commission provide further direction
regarding the use of curve warning signs at this location.
Attachment:
Exhibit "A"— Location Map
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
�sq�y •I .
���' �� i�tie�� ,�• a � �!y✓ ��
milt
OL
/`\Ar
jz
AIR
MO
pp
le
k. r•�
'�' '' (z ,� 1�s moi'% �l�1►� +a j� EF.s�
� �.�,'� 1,•,,' �° P
e
1 11 111 „
TRAFFIC ENGINEER' S
REPORT
AI
,a
Y '19ss` MEMORANDUM
TO: Amer Attar, Acting City Engineer
FROM: Rodney Tidwell, Maintenance Superintendent—PW Streets
DATE: November 6, 2013
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report for October, 2013
CC: Judy McNabb, Administrative Assistant
Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer—Land Development
Jerry Gonzalez, Associate Engineer-Traffic
Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report for the Month of October, 2013.
The attached spreadsheets detail the maintenance activities and related costs completed by
both in house crews and maintenance contractors.
Attachments:
Monthly Activity Report Street Maintenance Division
Street Maintenance Contractors Detail Report
Contracted Maintenance Work Completed
Graffiti Removal Chart
-1-RAMAINTENANCE01VISION\STREETSMAINTENANCE AA1NTENANCENAONTHENO
ACTIVITY REPORT1CoverMemo.doc
I
m mNi p (1)
al M m O m O
09D z
< -�1 z T tp1- x
mm m m
0 m c ' 3 D Q z v m z
m m D m A' O m A D A H
a C D m y P Z o a m CD A A m O C
ttt0 m O� �° z Z � .-� o �P 3 � v I a m$ 3 2 T �.
9 (n v1 n y m m m coo N � z 0 p m
O S m O t7 Z D .A J• o r m ;a A
CD �C-ppI Nm 0 ao Z (�Af �f�i, m H r�NtrD � Z am 7C
? m O a N O 0 CL N 00- N N .'O Z m D t��N ^ m
3 c o r m to y�9a� Am
-1 N S. �1 = J F O W 1 N d 1.d A O O
o m O m O h m � _ N D N m m m a <0 ��
D 0 B- m 3 N.mm m'0 z r A m mm 0m -
.r m 5 5 �c.J 1Cpp 'o m m m �i (1 m �i a m J CO
7 _ �
W Ol Q).9)T Ol
O1 7 W
f0 tO
:WW.tO't0W'.t0W W 041. p.W O-W 000 CD CO
- iD. O i0 'OID O-tD
m:
m _ A
my1 �� .
O ` A W N V W A O -� 0 0 0 t�D O O V O r
8 w O W W OV VCA a Co
m
m TFri OD
C
w w C q� in in w w 4A v+ - w w 40 - in.n 40 w w 40 40(0 w W >D r m
z <_
m. 0 c) <m0
V W 3 :CD W P W A N O Z'o m
IppV Of OD O1 N 0)to N C. CJ WW N H �i7711
V1 01 • A D1 A�l�CCn OOOD OONi 001 NOD p
O1 V 7_ V to N W A O W 0, p CD W Z
O (D O CD.. (T cn V V_ O Ol O CO O m O CO _ V _ A
-m - - - -
MM r
c A e
O Z
w w a
O w to wwww w ww ww ww ww ww w -
B a-
m a
O � A
a
IN
s
o
w w A w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w .
W
O
m ^n$
�. 01 N
O O N O N CNiI(NI1 C�j1 O N (Of1 N W A O O A 1C0.
OD V CAT m;K r.
m <
X ............._................_ .»._.»..._•_____ .._._._..._....... ._....._.,........-....«........._.._•_-__._-_-_____ _..__.____•-_____._-._.__-....._-._».__...
it w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w O
> B m
O
> N _ C N
Z _� A $ CD N 1D pN A yV CD CT A C/1 (11 O D C 3 C
W C)1 0 O A V W V (�1 -W m x C
W N N O O O W O A C)1 CO (T a 1 . . O'- r .
A CD to N t0M in V N NLl� pOp��1 pOp pO(T pOp O1 pA {Cpp L1 [1
A (n O OCCAI M L O WO O CT 88 GOOD p - Co p, I
v 1
.M tw w 0 tAwww w w w w w w w • +www ww w b C 3 C
I w O a A m
> r # 3
c m
p aq _ _ N n A n
m A N N N N W N CNJ OAf A CD A 001 OWoO fWJ O
m Of C1 N tD iD 01 A W A O V A O A 01 CD - N
i N- OD CD V N O
A W Oi O Of N A pO 0 21 pOp O pOp A A W W
N N w2410 W O W 0 0 O N -4 O.0 • • V p
0o N O O1 CT+O W N O
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The followings contractors have performed the following projects for the month of October,2013
pESCRIPTION 4 TOTAL COST
ACCOUNT s STREET/CHANNEL7BRIDGE OF WORK t SIZE
- f _
-- - -
CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MAN'AGEM'ENT
Date: 10-15-2013 CITYWIDE MISCELLANEOUS R.O.W.WEED SPRAYING TRASH AND
DEBRIS PICK UP.
TOTAL COST $9,654.00
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
Date:
TOTAL COST
T -z
CONTRACTOR: VES T.COAST ARBORISTS
Date: 10-28-2013 CITYWIDE ANNUAL R.O.W.TREE MAINTENANCE.
TOTAL COST $1,305.00
Date:
# fi 7
TOTAL COST
f CONTRACTOR. PACIFIC STRIPING INC = -
Date: 10-14-2013 CITYWIDE BI-ANNUAL RE-STRIPING OF ALL ROAD WAY WITHIN
IN CITY LIMITS.
I
TOTAL COST $141,913.70
Date:
#
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 10,959.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402$141,913.70
R:\MAINTAINNOACTRPT
3 m M CO) p o ai
nm m z z
D N 2 D r, D
Z r,
z D D m p n
O n 5 3 p n m z
< z m �►
m m m O
z y 0 m y O m
7 D -4 p O
n °' � y m
rn m m Q cn m M
d
z
a
-1 r m M
D (n In m m ro s'e Ul � in ori
Z m = =
N = m N (D
v1 mm o) a
n M m( m "n 0
-n nCD m o o o O
N O ZoNo O o 2 0 N onNm UQ
a s —U) w m U
m r�DJ
to itn t 69tt» j = i69 iEn 3 :69 E m M
im
O, io fo i =o io `a, ; i t i o I lo co n D 3
� Zm
mZ0
to RA to { ; (cA .� IfA 1 i .ivy i '!69 ! RA ! N A
C
m W
A A,1 i 1 ;o �o i i� ;� 1 1to c) ! Io
t to C N O 0
wo ;wo ;
En fE» RA ! I t&3 i =69 _ RA 1 to (�s► I O �
!
a+ ! Io to
;o !o ;o to t ;o io
; ; m
to i I i i t I!!
C5
t t -
(ft ice+ 169 t t ;w t t� j ; j t 9en i� I
w
o io t o i 'o
to !v+ I69 itfl ' i :to I t i ;to i 169 lw
EA !tfl i ice, iI = I A 4, 1 i6A i 'm= 1
i p o
c m
3 ;n
3
a 0-
co
-
W Q
A
fA t i-69I j � i i i jjai t� o Do
CML <m
CD D 3
= i E i 1CL
v I io iw ( io E°w' io o ?o f !o io o m 0)
4 ( N
n o I
-.4 I• t
o i$ 't io I
K a 3 o z p N n o
C <D Ot M 0-i 0 C<
z
m
0 _ 101
c
CO co V � Cr
N
ic
�D i N N W CO .0 m
Z
`D m O
n
V
C
Square Feet -
i N W r
V'i O V7 O cn /1 /�
O O O O O O C O 0 0 ` I
p
n 0
m --Icm
to
m -� 3
o is m
p m 0
e ZC
� o D � r-
0
o .0 � r3D
o �
0,
D
z
m
z
rD
m D
z
0
Qj
m
n v
CAI
0
i z
O N A Q, 00
O O O O O N A 00
O O O O O
No.of Calls
POLICE CHIEF' S REPORT
• COUNTY SHERIFFS • •
k� s } �y mgr' ?
K�hS U T F-IW3ES T ,� TAT�I£ 7N �g
� .
aa^ rIs ,' � �' :�LE, � fi .a '; �, ,.„;„�qua ' N+ .�� dr i' ' •_
To: Capt. Kubel
Sgt. Spivacke
Sgt. Edwards
Cc: Sgt. McDonald
Cpl. De Loss
Fm: Marianna Davis, Crime analyst
Date: November 1, 2013
Re: Part 1 crimes for the city of Temecula for October 1St— 31St 2013
Total part 1 calls for service: 244
160
145
140
120
1
100 ,
80 j
60
i
43
40
28
21
20
7
0
AGGRAVATED BURGLARY LARCENY THEFT ROBBERY VEH THEFT
ASSAULT
UCR combines vehicle burglaries into Larceny Theft category. This information includes vehicle burglaries in that category.
Data was obtained using Data warehouse. If you need any additional assistance in regards to
this request, please do not hesitate to ask. Thanks.
CITATION STATS
October, 2013
Citation Totals
Total Hazardous
Citations 1110
Total Non-Hazardous Citations 727
Parking Citations 121
Total Citations 1958
Citation.Breakdown
S.L.A.P. 73
N.E.T. Citations 87
School Zones 137
Seatbelt Citations 83
Community
Presentations 0
Trak Collisions
Non-Injury 25
Hit and Run 9
Injury 35
Fatal 2
Total 71
Pedestrian Related
Collisions 1
Note: Collision stats are only those calls for service resulting in a written Police
report.
D.U.I. Arrests
D.U.I. Arrests 28
Cell Phone
Cites
Total cell phone cites
(23123 & 23124 CVC) 292
Grant Funded DUI Checkpoints/Click it or Ticket Operations
None during October,2013
Commission Members November 12,2013
City of Temecula
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
41000 MainStreet
Temecula,CA 92590
Ref: Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Traffic Divisio n Activities/Eve nts
Dear Commission Members;
Below please find the Traffic Division activities for the month of October,2011 These activities include
the following:
• Citation statistics(attachment)
• Part 1 Crimes(attachment)
• Community Action Patrol supported call=outs:
October 9th—Traffic Collision, Nicolas Road near Calle Medusa
• Community Action Patrol activity./patrol hours:
870 hours for October,2013. Year-to-date total: 7,921 hours.
"Includedfor October were 20 patrols with 32 CAP members participating"
• Promenade Mall—None.
• Special Events:
October 18`h—Pistol Training at Rainbow Range
October 22nd—CAP Members attended the Temecula City Council Meeting for Appreciation
Awards
October 301h—Daytime Safety Checkpoint on Rancho California Rd and Moraga Road
• CAP Meetings:
October 9h—CAP staff meeting
October 10th—CAP General Membership Meeting
• Radar Trailer Deployments:
October 7th—October 91h: 42066 Avenida Alvarado
October 7th—October 9`h': Honors Dr x Crystalaire Dr
October 14`h—October 2V: Corte Mislanca near Via Puebla
October 14th—October 21": Via,Puebla x Monte Verde
October 21s`—October 28'h: Camino Rubano x Camino Otilla
If you have any questions regarding this package,please,do not hesitate to call me at the Temecula
Police Department,Traffic Division—(951)696-3072.
Sincerely,
Corporal Bryan De Loss
Temecula Police Department
Traffic Division
FIRE CHIEF' S REPORT
Riverside County Fire Department/ CAL FIRE
Emergency Incident Statistics
���
CAL
FIRE
SINCE 1B85
4 11111.
zrziamo
:AL%
FIRE
DEPAMTM ENT
John R. Hawkins
Fire Chief
11/6/2013
Report Provided By: Riverside County Fire Department
Communications and Technology Division
GIS Section
Incidents Reported for the month of October,2013 and TEMECULA City
n
c
a
N
N
7
O
J
m A
m A2 n 0 w m c 0 0 I= y
2lbA :r ulA c m m a N h
CL n
13
r m F+ a p ( 3A 'ted
N 0
o m
N
� a
+
_ 3
N 7
c
� M
n
CL
0
3
70
m
v
0
+ o
r a
0 e
3 '
O m
A p 3 y
tll �
N 0 O
O 7
N a l9
N O a
C 3 0
N N
O O
3 r.
w w
K
w a
m
m
x
m
A
rC
i
_A
a -4 wo < 0m0 -0 -n � �
m o mm W �' c d v CD
A ' 41 N SCD ? Nj Q fp �{ Q
O - 0 - K a n <D Cf o
f0 11 O 7'I 0�1 Sr cn D 0
(D NCD Dl O
n CD
CD o
D
w
b!
N�
O W N W W W V W A M N
eY
JI O p O
w Y1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - W -+ W V
3 O N W b" (T M V (D Oo 6
o o o
A
W N N V
N woi -4 wNw -+ w 46
w
10 s O J C J
N • �+ Y N
� a A
Co n C7 cn n
7
O 1 7 Z
p 0 O 0 O O O 0 O O
-i N -1 m (Di m
o g m e m A
+ + pp N J d N
V V V W J + a CNP 00 W N
= M
� A
CL
Q
O W
� D►
O O O O O O N N +
T
CQ
N
O
O O O O
17
W 01
ocr) rr
cn m v 0
Ga W O) m 0 o ae oe a, A 2 v
g s of
7
� a
N V
O O + O 0 a O O O T ;
m YI
a
J W W O O + N N U O'
_ pp O
Ol N N O O O O 00 ONo w_
o �
T
2
CD
s
v D �
m
A 3 m
2
v
w �
d
3
N
Q
Cl)
T
O
N � �
� A
CL
A
7
CA v ep
w 2 v N
d 2
CSD V
A z C
M N 1
rn T d
f0
[n O
V :r 33
Q
o
w
c� 'n
SPM m
CL CLCD 0 17
T
3! o m � N• � n�
� D
N
N
N•
i v
V1
N 2!
OD.. .e W V W N W N W A Z
M W
m
w
n
CL
M
2
or
c
c
(.
o
cn pj
o
N
r►
e�
c
3
d
X v O O K K m T n n T
mC mo ao) 0 m m D
= _ -u CN n Nn mD m m = am3 v Z
CD Al oa D Z O O D m p wm T
mo _ Wr
r r p n
m m
3 m�t g m --i C w
'm 2 m m (� m
CD.
fA D_ V
O p �,
O Z O n
�,
r
m y Ch
o O �
m --1O
y r D
� r
W N O O W WO m O OA N O N V cT O A N 3
m
o o w w o m � v w a, c A
01
O
O W A O O H N O O N N N N d m A N O d /�
m
c OO
V O N O O v O W Np D Of O W W
Oy
VO 'A W co N W cD V O cvli W N Iri 3 O N m O
O 0 O
O> a, O W O W O O = H W
� n
A O A A U O N Cl)
Ln W W Oo
"111�yy`�1
W f0 O ? O O N W O a cn co N fo [�
O
w N N N C11 O N N roN mO 'p V O O coIm
'O y
W O W m J O W N W O N W A O O O
O p O p
< <
o o ov
O N N V W N co
N + O
O O O + �► W N t7� O ,p 0 -I O'1 W O V W tJ� 10
omcnomm -no M * < -jwMMMOOK �,- 2 -no 5
mo -- cOOm —T -v c -
D 2 2 2 Q Q- — C) Co > CD cD =' N n
C7 = Q
2rr2Dp •nom � -n =' cn co c w
� -nnno Cr 2) CD n O 3 su Cr
cn 2 T cp o T W �! CD
rn cn
m CD CD n
D
D D a O a N
N 4) <D
O n O
O
3 3
91)
-o
N '
Ka 0
0
w w
CD C) O O .90 jO � N) OcnC)C)00
0
N j
N N
0 O
O O 0 0 0 0 W O W -I O W N C.) O N co V O
j J
W W
v v
CD
O O O O CJI -Pn O 0) O O N N O N
CD CD7
m CD
0 0
7 7
cQ tQ
CD fD