HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-07 OB SARDA Resolution RESOLUTION NO. OB SARDA 13-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY APPROVING THE EXTENSION OF THE 6TH
STREET PROMISSORY NOTE
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OVERSIGHT BOARD OF THE
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of.Directors hereby finds determines and declares as
follows:
A. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula was a redevelopment
agency in the City of Temecula, duly created pursuant to the Community
Redevelopment Law, Part .1, commencing with Section 33000, of Division 24 of the
California Health and Safety Code (hereafter the "Temecula Redevelopment Agency").
On June 12, 1988, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside adopted
Ordinance No. 658 adopting and approving the "Redevelopment Plan for Riverside
County Redevelopment Project No. 1988-1." On December 1, 1989, the City of
Temecula was incorporated. The boundaries of the Project Area described in the Plan
are entirely within the boundaries of the City of Temecula. On April 9, 1991, the City
Council of the City of Temecula adopted Ordinances Nos. 91-08, 91-11, 91-14, and 91-
15 establishing the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and transferring
jurisdiction over the Plan from the County to the City. Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 91-
11 and 91-15, the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of
Temecula assumed jurisdiction over the Plan as of July 1, 1991. The Plan has been
amended by Ordinance Nos. 94-33, 06-11 and 07-20 adopted by the City Council. The
Agency duly adopted its Implementation Plan for 2010-2014 on December 8, 2009 in
accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 33490.
B. The City Council of the City of Temecula adopted Resolution No. 12-02
January 10, 2012, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34173 and applicable
law electing for the City to serve as the Successor Agency for the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency upon the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Temecula. The City Council of the City of Temecula, Acting as the Governing Body
for the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, adopted Resolution
No. 12-01 on February 28, 2012 declaring the Successor Agency to the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency duly constituted pursuant to law and establishing rules and
regulations for the operation of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment
Agency ("Successor Agency").
C. The California Redevelopment Association and League of California Cities
filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of California (California Redevelopment
Association, et al. v. Matosantos, et al. (Case No. S194861)) alleging that ABX1 26 and
ABX1 27 were unconstitutional.
D. On December 29, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in the
Matosantos case largely upholding ABX1 26, invalidating ABX1 27, and holding that
ABX1 26 may be severed from ABX1 27 and enforced independently
E. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, on February 1, 2012, all
redevelopment agencies, including the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, were
dissolved and replaced by successor agencies established pursuant to Health and
Safety Code Section 34173.
F. The City acquired the property generally located at 6th Street and Front
Street, APN 922-023-021 (the "Property") and conveyed the property to the former
Temecula Redevelopment Agency.
G. The former Temecula Redevelopment Agency approved a five-year
Promissory Note on March 12, 1996.
H. The former Temecula Redevelopment Agency approved a five-year
extension of the Promissory Note on April 23, 2002.
I. The former Temecula Redevelopment Agency approved a five-year
extension of the Promissory Note on December 16, 2008.
J. The Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
approved a five-year extension of the Promissory Note on November 12, 2013.
K. The Property has been developed for redevelopment purposes.
L. The Successor Agency received a Finding of Completion from the
California State Department of Finance on April 26, 2013.
M. The 6th Street Promissory Note has been placed on the Recognized
Obligation Schedule for the period of January 1, 2014 through June 30, 2014.
N. Accordingly, the Board desires to adopt this Resolution approving the
extension of the 6th Street Promissory Note.
Section 2. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to Health and Safety Code
Section 34191.
Section 3. The Board hereby approves the 6th Street Promissory Note
originally dated March 12, 1996 and approves the revised Promissory Note in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A, extending the Note to December 16, 2018.
Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Oversight
Board of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency this Lith day of
December, 2013.
J n Meyer, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan . Jones, MMC
ecretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA
I, Susan W. Jones, MMC, Board Secretary of the Oversight Board of the Successor
Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. OB SARDA 13-07 was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency at a meeting thereof held on the 11th day of December, 2013, by
the following vote:
AYES: 4 4 BOARD MEMBERS: Heyer, Kelliher, Ordway-Peck, Gonzalez
NOES: = O BOARD MEMBERS: None
ABSENT:, 3 BOARD MEMBERS: Sparkman, Thornhill,Turner
ABSTAIN:`Jo BOARD MEMBERS: None
Susan Jones, MMC
Board Secretary
EXHIBIT A
Promissory Note
PROMISSORY NOTE
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula originally executed this.Promissory
Note on April 23, 2002 and used the funds for redevelopment purposes. This tern of
Ws Promissory Note has been extended by the parties through December e, 2013.
The parties have agreed to:. (1)further extend the Promissory Note through-December
16.2018,(2) make revisions to the terms as required by the provisions of ABX1 2e and
AB 1484,including Health and Safety Code.Section 34191.4; and(3)recognize that.the
Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency has assumed the
Promissory Note by operation of law. Therefore, the Promissory Nota Is hereby
amended and restated to read as follows:
'The Succeesor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency rA °) hereby
prorrfses, for constdera3lon read, to pay the City of TemecWa {°CHy") the eurn of
Sarrert HundM T Three Thousand One Hundmd Eighteen Dollars and No1100
(5723.118)bearing Interest at ft saw rate off'ared by do Ca tomb I AgwWe
Itty ofte it fund in no aaremponr3ng rfuwter daft the gran al the ProrntsM Nob.
This Note wW ell e6mad ttt unt from March 12. 110 ®hall be due end payebfer
December 1A 2116 as aftrided by mutu&1 wdtlen agreamwd of ttRe Clgf and ft
Ajwwy. The Agency rnsy'makD parW payrraft or repay fire amount of tip Note(n full
prior to the due dde vdthmd Ranahy'
This amended and restated Promissory Note is made as of November 12, 2013 at
Temecula California.
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE
T>=MECU A RED
�tjAVELOR1`,�1ENT AGENCY
r � M 19-
WIrkeel&.Nsr
Cheirpereon
ATTLe r.
uaan ..1a AI e
City rls
Pdk'dl.Ting
Amy
PROMISSORY NOTE
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula('Agency") hereby
promises, for cordideratioa received, to pay the City of Temecula("City") the Rum of Nine
;tom HUn&W Sooty 00 Udkm WNW 1W(p918,L71,00)
e#' �dt ft bates_ ; t. by 1 t 1
d*Mi mv- Ars Neft aid au
payable five(3)years from the date of this Note unless extended by mutual written
agreement of the City and Agency without interim payments by the Agency during the term
dw N^powdo lW ft Agpq aamy uWm pKW#q=W or an tw WHO Of f
t�B�.
of! _ a t de�Lid�A t� y - .
dAut by ft Agwq,f Cky-fta hm A Md eqwi6k
M"W" if 1 PTO
This Note is made as of March 12, 1.996 at Temecula, California.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
C. ;OF TBMECULA
maw—
ATTEST:
Seadmyrry
duty CSC
AS TO
I Caen
aew,tv6.3o,",a�
PROMISSORY NOTE
The.Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula("Agency')hereby
promises,for consideration received,to pay the City of Temecula("City')the sum of
One Million Three Hundred Fifty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and NO/100
($1,357,500.00)bearing simple interest at the rate of the prime interest rated charged by
Union Bank as of the date of this Note. This Note and all accrued interest from March
12, 1996 shall be due and payable May 1,2007 unless extended by mutual written
agreement of the City and the Agency without interim payments by the Agency during
the term of the Note,provided that the Agency may make.partial payments or repay the
amount of the Note in full prior to the due date without penalty. This Note is and will be
subordinate to all existing debt of the Agency and such additional debt as the Agency
may incur during the term of this Note and no funds of the Agency are pledged to its
repayment. In the event of a default by the Agency,the City shall have all legal and
equitable remedies available to it to enforce the terms of the Note.
This Note is made as of April 23,2002 at Temecula California.
REDEVELOP1vIEN: ,AGENCY OF THE
TY, F,TEM 1A-
rpmn
ATTEST:
Susan Vl Jones;CMC
City G k
Peter M.Thorson
General Counsel
P A01dtown\Sixth StreaTmmissorynowdoc
PROAUSSORY NOTE
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula("Agency")hereby
promises,for consideration received,to pay the City of Temecula("City')the sum of
One Million Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars and N0I100($1,903,333.00)bearing
simple interest at the rate of S%annually. This Note and all accrued interest from March
12, 1996 shall be due and payable.December 16,2013 as extended by mutual written
agreement of the City and the Agency without interim payments by the Agency during
the tern of the Note,provided that the Agency may make partial payments or repay the
amount of the Note in full prior to the due date without penalty. This Note is and will be
subordinate to all existing debt of the Agency and such additional debt as the Agency
may incur during the term of this Note and no funds of the Agency are pledged to its
repayment. In the event of a default by the Agency,the City shall have all legal and
equitable remedies available to it to enforce the terms of the Note.
This Note is made as of December 16,2008 at Temecula Califomia.
-RED. .:• _ PMENT .' ]3NCY _�THE
Ron Roberts _
Chairperson
ATTEST:
,
SusanA Dori .es,_MMC7 cy Secretary
City CI,
a
fi r.
Peter M. Thorson
Agency Counsel
ZAOWtmm%Sifh SOrc W"n-luoj=ZDCC1608.dOC