Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
033198 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.1 04 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MARCH 31, 1998 - 7:00 PM 5:30 PM - Closed Session of the City Council and Agency pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at the west side of Second Street and Front Street {APN 922-46-022, APN 922-07-024). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Cleveland Investment Company, Temecula Investment Company, and William E. Fortner and Margaret Ann Fortnet. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9{a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City and/or the Agency. The following case will be discussed: Pratt vs. City of Temecula. 3. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at 28545 Front Street (APN 922-035-011). The negotiating' parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and Ladd Penfold and Barcena and Company. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. 4. Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at approximately .90 acres westerly of Front Street and Santiago extension (Lots 10 and 11, Block 32 Town of Temecula). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and Margarita Canyon LLC. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. R:\Agenda\033198 1 At approximately 9:45 PM, the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 PM and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 PM. Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 98-05 Resolution: No. 98-25 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Ron Roberts presiding Prelude Music: Eve Craig Invocation: Pastor Bill Rench, Calvary Baptist Church of Temecula Flag Salute: Councilmember Comerchero ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Agency Showcase Award presented by California Parks and Recreation Society (CPRS) Certificate of Appreciation for John R. Harrison Certificate of Appreciation for Robert Majeski National Public Health Week PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. R:\Agenda\033198 2 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 14, 1998. 2.2 Approve the minutes of March 17, 1998. 3 Resolution Approving List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Records Destruction Approval RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. R:\Agenda\033198 3 7 9 Award of Contract for Remote Access Server RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Award a contract for a Compaq ProLiant 850R 6/200H Server with Citrix WinFrame Enterprise 1.7 Remote Access to Inacom Information Systems, San Diego, California, in the amount of $14,481.02. Sister Citv Association Student Trip to Voorburg RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve an expenditure of funds in the amount of $1,900 to provide the 19 students traveling to Voorburg, Netherlands a check in the amount of $100 for each student. Contract Plan Checking Services RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve an Agreement for Plan Check Services with J. A. S. Pacific Services for the Building and Safety Department. Release Bond for Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees in Parcel Map No. 19580-1 and accept Substitute Bond for Parcel 3 (West of Diaz Road and North of Rancho California Road) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize release of bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees in Parcel Map No. 19580-1; 8.2 Accept a Traffic Signal Mitigation bond and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreement for the remaining parcel as submitted by the owner; 8.3 Direct the City Clerk to notify the developers and sureties. Reimbursement Agreement - City of Temecula and the Pechanga Development Corporation RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Approve the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Development Corporation in the amount of $77,220.00 for the Pala Road Widening Project between Via Eduardo and Pechanga Road; 9.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute this Agreement. R:\Agenda\033198 4 10 All-Way Stop - Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road 11 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP" AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PIO PICO ROAD Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR OLD TOWN TEMECULA AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY R:\Agenda\033198 5 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 98-01 Resolution: No. CSD 98-05 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeffrey E. Stone ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemarts, Roberts, Stone PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" before the Board of Directors gets to that item. individual speakers. form must be filed with the City Clerk There is a five (5) minute time limit for Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors, should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record, CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 14, 1998. Approve the minutes of March 17, 1998. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT - Nelson R:\Agenda\033198 6 GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT - Bradley BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 14, 1998, scheduled to follow the City Council Consent Calendar, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\033198 7 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 98-01 Resolution: No. RDA 98-07 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Karel Lindemarts presiding ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, Lindemans PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item net listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 1.2 Approve the minutes of March 14, 1998. Approve the minutes of March 17, 1998. 2 Awarding a Contract to Steve Krabbe to Paint the Second Phase of the Mural at the Old Town Transportation Center RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award the contract for $21,250 to Steve Krabbe to Paint the Second Phase of the Mural at the Old Town Transportation Center; 2.2 Authorize Executive Director and Agency Counsel to Execute the contract. R:\Agenda\033198 8 RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING - Mayor Roberts DEPARTMENTAL REPORT REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 14, 1998, scheduled to follow the Community Services District Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\033198 9 WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY Next in Order: Ordinance: No. WHFA 98-01 Resolution: No. WHFA 98-07 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, Stone, Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENT: A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Westside Improvement Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Agency on an item not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Agency gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 17, 1998. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 14, 1 998, scheduled to follow the Redevelopment Agency Meeting, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\033198 10 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL BUSINESS 12 Public Facility Deposits for Non-Residential Development (Continued from the meeting of March 17, 1998.) RECOMMENDATION: 13 14 15 16 12.1 Review the information provided concerning the Public Facility Deposits which have been collected for non-residential development since 1 991 and provide direction to staff to resolve. Reject all Bids for the Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97-27 RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Reject all bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canon Road, Project No. PW97-27; 13.2 Deny a request for installation of a traffic signal or "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Pala Road and Muirfield Road. Golf Course Properties - Temecula Special Tax RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Establish the amount of the Temecula Parks/Lighting Special Tax applied to golf course properties within the City of Temecula. Appeal of 1997-98 Temecula Parks/Street Lighting Tax: Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PARK/STREET LIGHTING TAX LEVIED AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN El Nino Update (Oral Presentation by Director of Public Works Joe Kicak.) R:\Agenda\033198 11 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 14, 1998, 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R :\Agenda\033198 12 PROCLAMATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS ITEM 1 ITEM 2 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 14, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 9:07 AM at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Roberts presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Stone, Roberts ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager Ronald Bradley and Acting City Clerk Susan W. Jones. It was duly moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session at 9:07 AM pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8, concerning the acquisition of real property located at APN Nos. 922-046-022 and 922-073-024. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and William and Margaret Fortner, Cleveland Investment Company and Temecula Investment Company. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. The motion was unanimously carried. Mayor Roberts reconvened the City Council Meeting at 10:08 AM. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the flag salute by Mayor Pro Tern Ford. PUBLIC COMMENTS Allen Brogan, 30611 Open Circle, addressed the City Council regarding the proposed signal at Rainbow Canyon Road and Pala Road. He requested the Council consider moving the signal from Rainbow Canyon to Muirfield Road. Marilyn S. Givens, 45526 Tournament Lane, also addressed the City Council regarding the proposed signal at Rainbow Canyon Road. She stated she is not interested in stopping this signal, but requested that an additional signal be placed at Muirfield Road to accommodate more homeowners in that area. COUNCIL BUSINESS Workshop Discussion of Overall City Goals and Procedures City Manager Bradley began the discussion by listing the immediate traffic projects identified by the City Council at the workshop of February 21, 1998. He identified which projects were currently budgeted. Minutes\031498 -1 - City Council Minutes March 14, 1998 Councilmember Lindemans requested an explanation of the different types of funds and what restrictions each carried. City Manager Bradley and Finance Director Genie Roberts gave an explanation of individual account fund balances and how these funds could be used. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a brief recess at 10:35 AM. The meeting was reconvened at 10:40 AM. Councilmember Stone stated that as a City matures, expenditures begin to exceed income, and he cautioned the Council to not decrease the City's reserve for economic uncertainty. Councilmember Lindemans asked how much the Council would feel comfortable retaining for economic uncertainty. Councilmember Comerchero stated he would like to leave 5 million dollars in the economic uncertainty fund. City Manager Bradley suggested that this be done through the budget process when all information is available. He stated that staff is 60 days away from the Capital Improvement Program Workshop where funds are identified. Mayor Pro Tem Ford suggested going through the list of immediate traffic projects and discussing each item. He suggested looking at the means to "kick-start" projects. He stated it needs to be discussed where we are going for the future. What do we need now, six months for now and two years from now. City Manager Bradley stated that additional staffing is needed to accomplish this work and three additional people can be added to staff in the next 60 days. City Manager Bradley went through the Council Immediate Traffic Projects list to obtain consensus on each item as follows: Winchester Off-Ramp Widening Council consensus was obtained. Santa Gertrudis Bridge Creek Widening and 79S Missing Link Council consensus was obtained. Rancho CAL Interchange Change Order for Expediting (80 working days) Mayor Roberts - undecided Mayor Pro Tem Ford- yes Councilmember Comerchero no Councilmember Lindemans yes Councilmember Stone no Minutes\031498 -2- City Council Minutes March 14, 1998 Councilmember Stone and Comerchero stated they did not feel 80 working days early completion was worth $300,000, which could be used for other projects. Mayor Roberts asked to revisit this issue later in the meeting. He also stated he feels there is a problem with traffic backing up on Ynez, which further aggravates this interchange. Councilmember Lindemans asked when this interchange is scheduled for completion. Public Works Director Joe Kicak stated the Interchange is scheduled to be completed May 15, 1999. He reported, if a change order to expedite the process, would move the completion date to January of 1999. 1-15 Southbound Off Ramp at Rancho CAL Change Order Council consensus was obtained with Mayor Pro Tern Steve Ford as undecided. Overland Cash Advance Council consensus was obtained. Resurface City Streets Council consensus was obtained to keep the program at current levels. Pala Road Widening Council consensus was obtained for the Design Work for Pala Road Widening. Mayor Roberts stated discussions will continue with the Pechangas for participation on this project. City Manager Bradley stated the construction would be something that could be addressed in the five-year Capital Improvement Program. Diaz Connection to Washington Council consensus was obtained. Signal Visual Monitor and Control Council consensus was obtained to move forward to the operating budget to expedite this process. Diaz "Causeway" to Connect Diaz to Jefferson at Date Street Council consensus was not obtained. 1-15 On/Off Ramps at Santiago Council consensus was obtained to start design work. Stone in opposition. 4-0-1, Councilmember Direct Route from Margarita to I-1,5 Council consensus was not obtained. Minutes\031498 -3- City Council Minutes March 14, 1998 1-15 Split Diamond North of Winchester Council consensus was not obtained. Santiago from Margarita to Ynez Council consensus was not obtained. Old Town First Street Bridge Funds Available Council consensus was obtained to free up these funds. Councilmember Stone abstained. RECESS Mayor Roberts called a recess at 12:00 Noon. The meeting was reconvened at 12:36 PM. PUBLIC COMMENTS Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road North, representing the Public Traffic Safety Commission, suggested that the extension of Overland Drive off and across the creek be considered as a possible solution to traffic problems. Mayor Roberts recessed the meeting at 12:41 PM to accommodate the Community Services District Meeting and the Redevelopment Agency Meeting. Mayor Roberts reconvened the City Council meeting at 1:01 PM. Mayor Roberts asked that the Council revisit the Rancho California Interchange Change Order for Expediting (80 Working Days), stating he would now support that action. Councilmember Comerchero also stated he would be in favor of supporting this action. Council consensus was obtained for this item 4-1-0, with Councilmember Stone in opposition. Mayor Pro Tem Ford stated he is in favor of the I-15 Southbound Off Ramp at Rancho California Change Order, making the consensus unanimous. Councilmember Stone confirmed that these projects will be funded out of Undesignated funds and not out of Economic Uncertainty Funds. City Manager Bradley confirmed these projects will be funded out of undesignated funds. City Manager Bradley explained that the Council would have less funds to work with at the beginning of the Capital Improvement Program Workshop, due to direction given at this workshop. Mayor Pro Tern Ford stated that currently the Redevelopment Agency holds for re-sale, property valued at $5 million. He explained it is his understanding that a like amount must be deposited. He suggested making the decision to liquidate this property and free up further funding. Minutes\031498 -4- Citv Council Minutes March 14, 1998 He also suggested that a representative from the Riverside County Flood Control address the City Council regarding a joint use project on the Northwest Sports Park property. Public Works Director Joe Kicak stated that in looking at a memo from Frank Peers, Flood Control is more concerned about timing, since they are several years from starting this project. Community Services Director Shawn Nelson stated that funding has to be obtained, and they are looking at five years before they could construct the improvements. Councilmember Lindemans requested a combined CIP/Immediate Traffic Projects list be prepared with completion dates. Councilmember Comerchero asked that a periodic update be given to the Council regarding progress of these projects. City Manager Bradley addressed the level of Community Service Funding the Council desires. Councilmember Stone stated he is not in favor of setting a percentage for Community Service Funding, but feels it should be a part of the budget process, and determined at what level the Council could afford. He stated he would be in favor of increasing the $100,0OO to $150,000, but would prefer to leave it at a fixed amount. Mayor Roberts stated that last year, the Council gave organizations more than they actually needed, and suggested a 95,000 cap per organization. Councilmember Linderoans suggested Community Services Funding be set at .75 percent with a 95,000 cap per organization. Councilmember Stone asked that the motion be split. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Comerchero to set Community Service Funding at .75%. The motion carried with Councilmember Stone in opposition. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Stone to place a 95,000 cap per organization. The motion was unanimously carried. City Manager Bradley moved on to library discussions. Councilmember Lindemans stated at the last meeting he discussed the possibility of the library being located on the Linfield property. He suggested that the 7 ½ acres on Ynez and Santiago also be an option. City Manager Bradley stated this has already been identified as an option. He requested the Council give input to staff on any other sites they would like considered as a part of the process. City Manager Bradley stated that staff will bring forward the proposal to add three additional staff members to Engineering on the March 17, 1998 City Council Meeting. He also reported the Temecula Creek Appeal will be coming to the Council on March 17, 1998. Minutes\031498 -5- City Council Minutes March 14, 1998 City Manager Bradley reported workshops were scheduled with all community volunteer groups, to access how the City can better support and assist these groups in their goals. Bill Dendy reported that he is still not able to find the Old Town Market Analysis that was prepared. Mary Jane McLarney stated the Keyser Marston study will be complete in approximately 50 days. Mayor Roberts stated he met with Fred Lamb, President of the Museum Foundation, who informed him that the museum should be complete within the next 90 days. He also stated they are working with the Pechanga Tribal Council as possibly using the second story of the museum for a Pechanga exhibit. He explained that if these come to fruition, the Pechanga Tribal Council will fund the elevator to comply with ADA Guidelines. There was discussion that some duplication is going on between the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, the Economic Development Corporation and the Chamber of Commerce. Mayor Roberts expressed his desire to "jump start" Old Town through advertising. He also delineated the changes in the Economic Development Corporation by having the City of Murrieta become a full member and by viewing this group as a Temecula Valley Organization. Councilmember Comerchero suggested preparing a matrix of duties performed by each organization to insure that overlap does not occur. City Manager Bradley stated staff will put together a comprehensive analysis on what each of the agencies do. City Manager Bradley discussed the Fire Training Facility and reported that the Clark Training Facility will be recommended as the preferred training site for fire personnel. He stated that a proposal is being prepared to fund half of the staffing out of French Valley, and this will be brought to the Council the first meeting in April. Mayor Pro Tem Ford asked that future sites be explored that would address the southerly end of town. Mayor Roberts stated that the Pechanga Tribal Council is putting in a fire station and asked if some joint use may be used from that location. City Manager Bradley stated there are challenges with such an agreement, however it should be discussed. City Council Joint Commission meeting dates were discussed. Council consensus was gained for the City Council/Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, April 21st and City Council/Community Services Commission on Tuesday, May 5. Mayor Roberts stated he does have a conflict on Tuesday, May 19th and asked that the City Council/Public Traffic Safety Commission be rescheduled for a future date. Bill Dendy, stated he would withhold his comments until a future date. Minutes\031498 -6- City Council Minutes March 14, 1998 City Attorney Thorson reported that according the Brown Act, there was nothing to report from closed session. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Stone to adjourn at 2:10 PM to a meeting on March 17, 1998, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk Minutes\031498 -7- MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL MARCH 17, 1998 CLOSED SESSION A meeting of the City of Temecula City Council was called to order at 5:30 P.M. It was duly moved and seconded to adjourn to Closed Session, pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1) Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following claim will be discussed: Phillip Starks vs. City of Temecula. 2) Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at northeast corner of La Paz and Highway 79 South (APN 922-190-025). The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, and Moramarco. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. 3) Conference with real property negotiator pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 concerning the acquisition of real property located at the west side of Second Street and Front Street (APN 922-046-022; APN 922-073-024). The negotiating parties are the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula and William E. Fortner and Margaret Ann Fortner, Cleveland Investment Company and Temecula Investment Company. Under negotiation are the price and terms of payment of the real property interests proposed to be conveyed and/or acquired. The Temecula City Council reconvened at 7:03 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, to consider regularly scheduled City Council business. Mayor Pro Tern Ford presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Councilmembers: Comerchero, Lindemans, Stone, and Ford. ABSENT: Councilmember: Roberts. Minutes\031798 1 Temecula City Council 031798 PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude and intermission music was provided by Tlm Peck and April Weber. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Marty Edwards, The Lambs Fellowship. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Flag salute by Boy Scout Troop 624. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Eagle Scout Certificate of Achievement for Danlel W. Chase The Certificate of Appreciation was presented by coudcilman Stone and accepted with appreciation by Daniel W. Chase. Certificate of Achievement for Joe Campana The Certificate of Appreciation was presented by Courcilman Stone and accepted with appreciation by Joe Campana. On behalf of the Problem-Oriented Policing Team, Sgt. Aim as well commended Mr. Campana on the receipt of this well-deserved Certificate. Proclamation for Mediation Week The proclamation was presented by Councilman Stoneiand accepted by Mr. Bob Rexstrom who advised that he would be at the courthouse on Wbdnesday, March 18, 1998, distributing information with regard to mediation versus litigation. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Ms. Pam Barret, 39897 Milkmaid Lane, Murrieta, proudly displayed the Temecula afghan which she had designed, advising that the sale of these afghans ($50.00) will profit Chaparral High School baseball. ~ Councilman Lindemans suggested that the first afghan be purchased by City Hall. Temecula City Council 022498 Councilman Comerchero suggested that additional afghans be purchased which could be utilized for future presents to Sister Cities and other dignitaries. B. Voicing no objection to the Council imposing restrictions with regard to RV parking on public streets, Mr. John Koran, 40645 La Colina Road, relayed his objection to the City imposing restrictions with regard to RV parking on private property. Because many of the RV owners are senior citizens and on fixed incomes, Mr. Koran noted that the additional expense for RV storage may be financially infeasible; therefore, he stated that the issue of RV parking on private property should be at the owner's discretion. C. Advising that he is a RV owner, Mr. Frank Geyer, 40466 Chauncey Way, informed the Council that in order to preserve his neighbors' views, he stores his RV and pays monthly dues. D. Submitting photographs of what he viewed as rundown conditions in the Old Town area, Mr. Norman Taylor, 30048 Via Velez, relayed his opposition to restricting RV parking on public streets. E. Concurring that restrictions should be imposed to ensure that no dangerous/reckless situations are created on public streets as a result of RV parking, Mr. Eddie Salitore, 42733 San Julian Place, noted that, in his opinion, individuals should be permitted to park RVs on driveways if no other location on the private property were feasible. F. Mr. Mike Ramey, 40583 Windsor Road, recommended that a Citizens' Committee, comprised of RV owners, non-RV owners, and neutral entities, be formed in an effort to address the issues of concern. Mr. Ramey noted that, in his opinion, any vehicle extending into the sidewalk should be considered a safety issue. He suggested that future developments be required to designate a specific number of lots as RV accessible. In response to the written information submitted by Mr. Ramey, Councilman Lindemans requested that staff contact the City of Fullerton to determine how this City resolved a similar RV parking problem. G. Because of safety and aesthetics concerns, Mr. Bill Gray, 40414 Yardley Court, relayed his objection to RV parking on public streets and, therefore, concurred with imposing a requirement that RVs must be stored. H. Mr. Dwaine Lewis, 40461 Calle Medusa, RV owner, spoke in support of an ordinance which would permit three-day visitor parking and permit 24 hours to load the RV and 24 hours to unload. I. Viewing the visual appearance of a recreational vehicle as unsightly, Mr. Gerald Hansen, 30398 Senela Court, encouraged the City Council to impose restrictions requiring the removal of any RV from driveways and public streets. Temecula Citv Council 022498 J. Mr. Bill Brown, 30959 Del Rey Road, relayed his opposition to imposing a stricter ordinance than what currently exists. K. Pleased with the increasing diversity of the transportation provided to the residents, Mr. Ed Dool, Temecula Stage Stop, informed the Council that Greyhound services have been expanded to include a 7:55 A.M. route to San Diego with two return routes at 3:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. L. On behalf of his father, Mr. Ed Elder, who is not a RV owner, Mr. Travis Elder relayed his father's opposition to government to dictating whether or not an individual may or may not park a RV in the driveway especially if measures were undertaken to maintain high aesthetic standards. If safety issues or other RV issues require resolution, Mr. Elder encouraged the City Council to address those issues versus imposing restrictions which would impact all RV owners. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Clarifying recent comments published in the local newspaper with regard to traffic improvement projects and associated funding, Councilman Comerchero noted that at a recent City Council Workshop, the City Council allocated previously undesignated funds in the amount of $3.5 million for traffic improvements and prioritized previously budgeted projects in the amount of $6.9 million. In an effort to expeditiously complete the above-referenced projects, Councilman Stone advised that three additional engineers will be hired. B. Councilman Stone advised that the Wine Country Chapter of City of Hope will have a fundraiser at Oscars on Monday, March 23, 1998, sponsored by Paradise Chevrolet. Advising that all proceeds from the $35 ticket price will profit the City of Hope, Councilman Stone invited all to attend. In an effort to find a cure for cancer, Councilman Lindemans as well encouraged those interested to attend this fundraiser. C. In light of the two recent Saturday City Council Workshops, Councilman Lindemans thanked staff for their time and effort. Noting that major topics of discussion included traffic issues, Mr. Linderoans relayed his amazement that certain individuals such as Mr. Sam Pratt were not in attendance of the meeting considering his past concerns with City traffic issues. D. Referencing the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's recommendations of May 22, 1997, Mayor Pro Tem Ford requested that these recommendations be distributed to the 4 Temecula City Council 031798 Councilmembers. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ford, Director of Public Works Kicak advised that these recommendations would be included as topics of discussion at the future Capital Improvement Projects Workshop. E. From personal experience, Mayor Pro Tem Ford commented on the number of runaway reports filed on a monthly basis and relayed the traumatic impact such a situation has on an entire family. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2. APProval of Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 10, 1998 2.2 Approve the minutes of February 21, 1998 2.3 Approve the minutes of February 24, 1998 3. Resolution Approving List of Demands 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1998 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of January 31, 1995. 5. Records Destruction Approval 5.1 Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. minutes\031798 5 Temecula City Council 031798 6. Support for SW Riverside County Workforce Development and One Stop Career Center 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING THE SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AND ONE STOP CAREER CENTER 7. Street Name Change from Springfield Court to Bostik Court 7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF SPRINGFIELD COURT TO BOSTIK COURT 8. Award a Professional Services Agreement to Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. to Perform Services to Update the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element and Appoint a Citizen-at-Large to Serve on the Update Steering Committee 8.1 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of $100,000.00 to Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. to perform services to update the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element. 8.;? Appoint a Citizen-at-Large to serve on the Update Steering Committee. {Pulled and discussed after Agenda Item No. 24; see pages1,5-16.) 9. Review of City Conflict of Interest Code 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE ClTY'S CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE minutes\031798 6 Temecula City Council 10. 11. 12. 13. 031798 Employment Systems Incorporated Contract 10.1 Approve an agreement for professional temporary help with Employment Systems Incorporated (ESI). Parcel Map No, 28697 (located at the northeast corner of Winchester Road - State Route 79 North - and Margarita Road) 11.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 28697 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 11.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 11.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement; and 11.4 Accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. "No Parking" Zones on Jefferson Avenue North of Winchester Road 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 98-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING "NO PARKING" ZONES ON JEFFERSON AVENUE NORTH OF WINCHESTER ROAD AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "A" Award of Construction Contract for Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6 - Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Project No. PW97-02 13.1 Award a construction contract for Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6, Cosmic Drive and Agena Street, Project No. PW97-02 to Contreras Construction Company in the amount of $92,610.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $9,261.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 13.3 Approve an advance in the amount of $81,500.00 from Development Impact Fees (DIF) to the Capital Improvement fund for sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6, Cosmic Drive and Agena Street, Project No. PW97-02. (Pulled and separately discussed; see page 10.) minutes\031798 7 Temecula City Council 031798 14. Award of Construction Contract for Installation of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, Project No. PW97-23 14.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, Project No. PW97-23. 14.2 Award a construction contract for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection to Macadee Electrical Construction in the amount of $104,969.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 14.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $10,496.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. (Pulled and separately discussed; see page 11 .) 15. Award of Construction Contract for Installation of a Traffic Signal on Pauba Road at Fire Station 84, Proiect No. PW97-26 15.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications for the installation of a traffic signal on Pauba Road at Fire Station 84, Project No. PW97-26. 15.2 Award a construction contract for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection to New West Signal in the amount of $46,301.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 15.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $4,630.10 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 16. Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal on Pain Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97-27 16.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications for the installation of an interim traffic signal on Pain Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97- 27. 16.2 Award a construction contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at this intersection to Transtech in the amount of $60,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 16.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. rninutes\031798 8 Temecula City Council 031798 (Pulled and separately discussed; see pages 11-13.) 17. Completion and Acceptance of the Construction of Slurry Seal Project FY97-98, Project No. PW97-13 17.1 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; and 17.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filling of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 18. Completion and Acceptance of the Traffic Signal Installation at Margarita Road and Yukon Road/Honors Drive, Project No. PW97-14 18.1 File Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 18.2 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 19. First Amendment to Agreement Between the City of Temecula and BidAmerica 19.1 Approve the Amended Scope of Services to include the scanning of building plans for the Building and Safety Department in its proposal for an additional amount not to exceed $18,397.00; 19.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Temecula and BidAmercia. 20. Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for Construction and Funding of Sixth Street Parking, First Street Bridge, Old Town Streetscape and Sam Hicks Park 20.1 Approve an Agreement entitled Cooperative Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of Sixth Street Parking, First Street Bridge, Old Town Streetscape and Sam Hicks Park; and 20.2 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report. (Councilman Stone abstained with regard to Consent Calendar Item No. 20.) minutes\031798 9 Temecula City Council 031798 MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved for the approval of Consent Calendar Nos. 1 through 7, 9-12, 15, and 17-20. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent and with Councilman Stone abstaining with regard to Item No. 20. (Consent Calendar Item Nos. 8, 13, 14, and 16 were separately discussed.) In light of Mayor Roberts' absence, Councilman Lindemans requested that Agenda Item No. 21 (Public Facility Deposits for Non-Residential Development) be continued to the March 31, 1998, City Council meeting. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to continue Agenda Item No. 21 to the March 31, 1998, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. 13. Award of Construction Contract for Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6 - Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Project No. PW97-02 13.1 Award a construction contract for Sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6, Cosmic Drive and Agena Street, Project No. PW97-02 to Contreras Construction Company in the amount of $92,610.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $9,261.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. 13.3 Approve an advance in the amount of $81,500.00 from Development Impact Fees (DIF) to the Capital Improvement fund for sidewalk Improvement Project No. 6, Cosmic Drive and Agena Street, Project No. PW97-02. Mr. Ken Bruckman, 42244 Cosmic Drive, thanked the City Council and City staff for their perseverance in approving this project and encouraged the City Council to continue with efforts to improve traffic safety issues throughout the City. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans, seconded by Councilman Stone, moved to approve the staff recommendation. Voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. 14. Award of Construction Contract for Installation of a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, Project No. PW97-23 14.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway, Project No. PW97-23. minutes\031798 10 Ternecula City Council 031798 14.2 Award a construction contract for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection to Macadee Electrical Construction in the amount of $104,969.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract. 14.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $10,496.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. Commending the City Council on its proactive approach, Mr. Ed Lindsing, 42375 Camino Merano, Vice President of the Vintage Hills Community Association, relayed his appreciation for efforts undertaken to install a light at the Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway intersection. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. 16. Award of Construction Contract for Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97-27 16.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications for the installation of an interim traffic signal on Pain Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97- 27; 16.2 Award a construction contract for installation of an interim traffic signal at this intersection to Transtech in the amount of $60,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the contract; 16.3 Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,000.00 which is equal to 10% of the contract amount. By way of a time line chart, Director of Public Works Kicak presented the staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: that the design for the interim signal, authorized in last year's Capital Improvement Projects (CIP), was completed in February; that it was anticipated that the signal would be constructed by August/September; that approval by FHWA for the widening of Pain Bridge Road (from two lanes to six lanes) was subsequent to the CIP budget of last year; that the bridge construction, the widening of Pain Road, and the extension of Rainbow Canyon Road would require the removal of the interim signal approximately eight to ten months after the installation of the interim signal; minutes\031798 11 Temecula City Council 031798 that staff would recommend the delay of the interim signal at Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon road and propose to install a permanent signal with the new six-lane highway as Pala Road is realigned and Rainbow Canyon Road is connected to it; anticipated completion date late 1999 to early 2000; that a number of residents on Rainbow Canyon Road are in opposition to the installation of the signal at this time because a signal at Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road will draw additional traffic into the residential neighborhood; that the residents would prefer a signal at Murfield Road and that studies are being completed to determine whether or not a signal at Murfield would be warranted; that there is a four-way stop sign at Loma Linda Road; that if the study would indicate that a signal at Murfield would be warranted, this signal could be completed within seven to eight months; that the salvage value of a custom traffic signal is nominal. In order to obtain safer ingress and egress for the community, Ms. Marilyn Givens, 45526 Tournament Lane, requested the installation of a signal at Murfield Road. For Councilman Comerchero, Public Works Director Kicak noted that once the bridge improvements have been completed, a signal will be warranted at Rainbow Canyon Road. In response to Councilman Lindemans suggestion to utilize pedestrian tunnels under the roadway, Mayor Pro Tem Ford noted that there are two issue of concern -- pedestrian movement and turn movements at Rainbow Canyon Road and Murfield Road. Echoing Ms. Givens' safety concerns, Ms. Karen Locklin, 30861 Bardmoor Drive, commented on the increased traffic in the neighborhood as a result of the Pechanga Center, additional developments, potential zoning changes, and upcoming development of the Senior Center. Although two traffic signals are needed, Ms. Locklin noted that a signal at Murfield Road would be the preferred choice. Mayor Pro Tern Ford suggested that this matter be continued to the March 31, 1998, City Council meeting at which time it will have been determined whether or not a signal at Murfield Road would be warranted and a more defined estimated date of completion could be provided. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Ford, Ms. Locklin voiced no objection to a continuance. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to continue this item to the March 31, 1998, City Council meeting. The motion was seconded by Councilman Lindemans and voice vote reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. minutes\031798 12 Temecula City Council 031798 At 8:47 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Winchester Hills Financing Authority. During the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting, the following item was jointly discussed with the City Council. RDA Bonds for a Multifamily Residential Rental Housing Development/Temecula Gardens. L.P. 3.1 That the Redevelopment Agency and City Council conduct a joint public hearing; 3.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY TEMECULA GARDENS, L.P. Redevelopment Director McLarney presented the staff report (of record), clarifying that the approval of Resolution No. 98-22 would not commit the Council/Agency to financing and that financing documents would be submitted for review and approval at a later date. There being no public input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-22. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent and Councilman Stone who abstained. At 8:59 P.M., the City Council resumed with regularly scheduled City Council business. PUBLIC HEARINGS None. minutes\031798 13 Temecula City Council 031798 COUNCIL BUSINESS 21. Public Facility Deposits for Non-Residential Development 21.1 Review the information provided concerning the Public Facility Deposits which have been collected for non-residential development since 1991 and provide direction to Staff to resolve. (Continued to the March 31, 1998, City Council meeting; see page 10.) 22. 1997-98 Community Service Funding Request 22.1 Consider the 1997-98 Community Service Funding Program request for the Temecula Murrieta Community Pantry. Director of Finance Roberts presented the staff report (as per agenda material), advising that the Pantry has submitted a funding request in the amount of $10,OO0; that the City's current Community Service Funding policy limits funding to $5,000 per organization; and that an additional appropriation would be required if the City Council should fund in excess of $5,000. In response to Councilman Stone's concern with possibly setting a precedent by accepting an application after the deadline date, Ms. Margie Hammersley briefly clarified the reason for the delay. In light of Councilman Lindemans' comment, Mayor Pro Tern Ford suggested that Councilman Lindemans work with staff to determine which organizations should receive funding in excess of the $5,000 and that a recommendation be forwarded to the Council for review. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve funding to the Temecula Murrieta Pantry in the amount of $5,000. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. 23. Approval of 1997-98 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments 23.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE VARIOUS DEPARTMENT BUDGETS minutes\O31798 14 Temecula City Council 031798 23.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS City Manager Bradley informed the Councilmembers that the proposed adjustments would encompass the addition of the three engineering positions and associated funding. Director of Finance Roberts briefly reviewed the staff report (of record). MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adopt Resolution Nos. 98-23 and 98-24. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. 24. El Nino Update Advising that the City to date has sustained nominal damage as result of El Nino, Public Works Director Kicak noted that more heavy rains are expected next week. In response to a citizen request received by Councilman Lindemans, City Manager Bradley and Public Works Director Kicak offered assistance with scheduling a meeting with the concerned residents and Temecula Creek Inn to discuss the elimination of the bend and, thereby, changing the course of the water to the west versus the north. (Discussed out of order.) Award a Professional Services Agreement to Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. to Perform Services to Update the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element and Appoint a Citizen-at-Larcje to Serve on the Update Steering Committee 8.1 Award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of ~100,000.00 to Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. to perform services to update the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element. 8.2 Appoint a Citizen-at-Large to serve on the Update Steering Committee. Community Services Director Thornhill reviewed the staff report (of record), advising that certain issues such as the construction of the Mall as well as other traffic issues considerably changed the scope of this project and, therefore, significantly increased the anticipated cost services. Mr. Thornhill noted that the cost of the originally submitted proposal has been reduced by $54,000 to the amount of 9100,000 and advised that the City is required by law to update its Circulation Element. minutes\031798 15 Temecula City Council 031798 MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to award a Professional Services Agreement in the amount of t~100,OO0.OO to Wilbur Smith Associates, Inc. to perform services to update the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. MOTION: Councilman Linderoans appointed Mr. Mike Naggar to the Update Steering Committee. Councilman Stone seconded the motion and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent. City Manager's Report In light of the two recent Saturday City Council Workshops, City Manager Bradley relayed staff's appreciation for the input which will permit staff to expeditiously proceed with next year's Capital Improvement Projects as well as associated staffing. City Attorney's Report With respect to the Closed Session, City Attorney Thorson advised that the City Council gave direction with respect to the real estate matters and the claim, noting that the real estate matters will be forwarded to the City Council at a later date for discussion and approval during open session. With regard to the claim, Mr. Thorson advised that action will be taken as per City Council direction. Councilman Linderoans, echoed by his fellow Commissioner, thanked staff for their efforts and hard work with regard to the two Saturday City Council Workshops. Adjournment At 9:25 P.M., Mayor Pro Tern Ford formally adjourned the City Council meeting to Tuesday, March 31, 1998, at 7:00 P.M. Ron Roberts, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk minutes\031798 16 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $1,247,227.45. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 31st day of March, 1998. ATFEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] Resos 98- I STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 31st day of March, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk Re,os 98- 2 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 03/12/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/19/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/31/98 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 03/19/98 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 03131198 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL $ 542,709.49 165 R DA- LOW/M O D 138,452.72 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 83,390.94 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 14,105.50 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 68.28 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 22,270.96 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 509.57 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ (ClP) 111,879.41 280 RDA-ClP 55,187.69 300 I NS URANCE 1,436.16 310 VEHICLES FUND 89,597.88 320 INFORMATIONS SYSTEMS 10,669.98 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 21,992.93 340 FACl LITI ES 6,142.73 390 TCSD DEBT SERVICE 1,253.00 $ 117,491.57 363,002.19 619,173.48 147,560.21 $ 1,247,227.45 1,099,667.24 PAYROLL: 001 GENERAL $ 97,490.39 165 R DA-LOW/MOD 5,214.05 190 TCSD 29,385.92 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 70.16 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 181.08 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 2,180.36 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 983.31 280 RDA-ClP 4,221.07 300 INSURANCE 629.91 320 IN FORMATION SYSTEMS 2,830.12 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 822.50 340 FACl LITI ES 3,551.34 TOTAL BY FUND: GENIE R~TS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE RONALD E. BRADLEY, Cl~ MANAGER 147,560.21 $ 1,247,227.45 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. VOUCHRE2 03/12/98 08:25 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LON/HO0 SET ASIDE 190 COHHUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL [HPROVEHENT PROJ FUND REDEVELOPHENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND INFORNATION SYSTEHS SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 380 RDA - DEBT SERVICE AMOUNT 35,778.32 1,742.49 14,838.51 82.00 1.96 767.01 21.44 16,840.85 18,861.62 1,090.32 4,314.39 19,225.70 2,673.96 1,253.00 TOTAL 117,491.57 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/12/98 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48276 03/10/98 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER STATE OF THE CITY:STAFF ATTEND 001-110-999-5260 200.00 200.00 48279 03/12/98 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SOFTBALL & BASKETBALL AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 359.89 48279 03/12/98 000724 A & R CUSTOM SCREEN PRI SOFTBALL & BASKETBALL AWARDS 190-183-999-5380 468.88 828.77 48280 03/12/98 ADAMCIK, STEPHEN REFUND:VICR FEES 001-170-4067 45.00 45.00 48281 03/12/98 001916 ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT JAN PROF SRVCS-O.T. ST. SCAPE 280-199-824-5802 3,330.00 3,330.00 48282 03/12/98 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE TAPES FOR POSTAGE MACHINE 330-199-999-5220 31.50 48282 03/12/98 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE FREIGHT 330-199-999-5220 5.07 48282 03/12/98 000110 AMERICAN BUSINESS SYSTE SALES TAX 330-199-999-5220 2.44 39.01 48283 03/12/98 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES 001-162-999-5263 94.55 94.55 48284 03/12/98 000101 APPLE ONE, INC. TEMP HELP W/E 2/21 CRAMER 001-150-999-5261 123.84 123.84 48285 03/12/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5240 184.91 48285 03/12/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR MAINT FAC., 340-199-701-5240 62.26 48285 03/12/98 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER, INC. DRINKING WATER FOR CRC 190-182-999-5250 30.94 278.11 48286 03/12/98 003162 B H E TECHNICAL STAFFIN TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/20 HAWKINS 001-163-999-5118 672.00 672.00 48287 03/12/98 003137 BARKERS FOOD MACHINERY CRC-DISHWASHER REPAIR 190-182-999-5212 122.00 122.00 48288 03/12/98 BLACK, KAREN REFUND:TAP/JAZZ DANCE 190-183-4982 60.00 60.00 48289 03/12/98 001414 BRADLEY, RONALD E. REIMB:LEAGUE CF EXPENSE 2/11 001-110-999-5258 81.33 81.33 48290 03/12/98 002099 BUTTERFIELD ENTERPRISES BATHROOM RENTAL IN OLD TOWN 280-199-999-5212 826.00 826.00 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 48291 03/12/98 000128 CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, CAL-SURANCE ASSOCIATES, WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB ~98 WORKERS COMP- FEB ~98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB '98 WORKERS COMP- FEB ~98 WORKERS COMP- FEB ~98 001-2370 3,235.48 165-2370 109.55 190-2370 1,150.66 191-2370 .80 192-2370 1.96 193-2370 50.36 194-2370 21.44 280-2370 79.57 300-2370 7.62 320-2370 39.24 330-2370 8.37 340-2370 264.06 190-181-999-5112 1.40 48292 03/12/98 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVES BOND SALE CF:J.MEYER 4/2-3 165-199-999-5261 150.00 4,970.51 150.00 48293 03/12/98 001267 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF MOTO REGISTRATION:C.M. VEHICLE 98 001-110-999-5226 493.00 493.00 48294 03/12/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEBIT:CREDIT POSTED TWICE 190-180-999-5415 4,592.00 48294 03/12/98 000126 CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA DEBIT:CREDIT POSTED TWICE 190-182-999-5415 238.95 4,830.95 VOUCNRE2 03/12/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 48295 48296 48297 48298 48298 48299 48300 48300 48300 48301 48302 48302 48302 48303 48304 48304 48305 48306 48307 48308 48308 48308 48308 48308 48308 48309 48310 48311 48312 48312 48312 48312 48312 08:25 CHECK DATE 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 VENDOR NUMBER 000398 000832 000131 001195 001195 001275 000442 000442 000442 000447 002945 002945 002945 001716 003006 002701 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 001380 003175 002712 001165 000165 000165 000165 000165 000165 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS VENDOR NAME CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL CALIFORNIA PUBLIC PRKG CARL WARREN & CO., INC. ITEM DESCRIPTION MEMBERSHIP:G.ROBERTS/MCDERMOTT MEMBERSHIP DUES:POLICE DEPT'98 ZONOS 08/05/96 CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC MAR ALARM SRVCS-C.R.C. CENTRAL SECURITY SERVIC MARCH ALARM SERVS-SR. CENTER COMPUSERVE, INC. COMPUSERVE INFORMATION SERVICE COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS MAR-JUN ALARM SRVC-CITY HALL MAR-JUN ALARM SRVC-MAINT FAC. MAR-JUN ALARM SERVICE - TCC COMTRONIX OF HEMET RADIO FOR P.W. PATCH TRUCK CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES FOR PARKS TCC-LENS FOR PARKING LOT LIGHT SALES TAX DAN~S ROOFING CITY HALL -REPAIR LEAK-STAIRWY DANIELS, KELLY DANIELS, KELLY REFUND:SECURITY DEPOSIT ROOM RENTAL DEWITT CUSTOM PAINTING FACADE IMPROV.PRGM:28475 FRONT DIVERSIFIED RISK FEB SPECIAL EVENT INSURANCE DURICK, VANESSA REFUND:KINDER,BATON,COMPUTER E S E S E S E S E S E S EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC EMPLOYMENT SERVIC TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/27 DIAZ TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/27 YONKER TEMP HELP (2)W/E 1/16 CABRAL TEMP HELP (2)W/E 1/16 CABRAL TEMP HELP (2)W/E 1/30 CABRAL TEMP HELP C2)~/E 2/27 CABRAL ECKLEIN COMMUNICATIONS, SUB:TOURISM DEV. REPORT ECONOMIC & POLITICAL AN ECONOMIC CONSULTING SERVICES ENTERTAINMENT PUBLICATI TEEN PROGRAM FUNDRAISER BOOKS FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS, INC. EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES EXPRESS MAIL SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-140-999-5226 001-170-999-5226 300-199-999-5205 190-182-999-5250 190-181-999-5250 320-199-999-5228 340-199-701-5250 340-199-702-5250 190-184-999-5250 001-164-601-5610 190-180-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 190-184-999-5212 340-199-701-5212 190-2900 190-183-4990 280-199-813-5804 300-2180 190-183-4982 001-140-999-5118 001-140-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 001-171-999-5118 280-199-999-5228 280-199-999-5248 190-183-4980 001-120-999-5230 001-162-999-5230 001-161-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 280-199-999-5230 ITEM AMOUNT 100.00 75.00 216.50 50.00 45.00 9.95 210.00 135.00 210.00 1,371.57 123.27 217.70 16.87 150.00 100.00 60.00- 2,500.00 866.20 30.42 1,603.79 811.41 287.11 1,068.68 1,103.55 1,355.79 325.00 1,000.00 600.00 7.00 36.50 8.50 23.00 8.50 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 100.00 75.00 216.50 95.00 9.95 555.00 1,371.57 357.84 150.00 40.00 2,500.00 866.20 30.42 6,230.33 325.00 1,000.00 600.00 83.50 VOUCHRE2 03/12/98 08:25 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 48313 03/12/98 003174 48314 03/12/98 000643 48314 03/12/98 000643 48315 03/12/98 000184 48315 03/12/98 000184 48315 03/12/98 000184 48315 03/12/98 000184 48315 03/12/98 000184 48315 03/12/98 000184 48316 03/12/98 001355 48317 03/12/98 000186 48318 03/12/98 002409 48319 03/12/98 000193 48320 03/12/98 001351 48321 03/12/98 002140 48322 03/12/98 000203 48323 03/12/98 002909 48323 03/12/98 002909 48324 03/12/98 001667 48324 03/12/98 001667 48325 03/12/98 000209 48326 03/12/98 001534 48326 03/12/98 001534 48327 03/12/98 003153 48328 03/12/98 001973 48329 03/12/98 002282 48330 03/12/98 002229 48331 48331 48332 48333 VENDOR NAME FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. FORTNER HARDWARE, INC. G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. HANKS HARDWARE, INC. HAZ PAK INC. I CMA INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS JOBS AVAILABLE, INC. K W C ENGINEERING, INC. K W C ENGINEERING, INC. KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE L & M FERTILIZER, INC. LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA MASTERS OF FINE TRAV LA PIERRE~ RANDY LA SALLE LIGHTING SERVI LIEBER, CARON LUCE PRESS CLIPPINGS, I 03/12/98 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 03/12/98 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERV 03/12/98 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS, INC. 03/12/98 002548 MORRIS SR., STEWART M. CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION SUB:FIREHOUSE MAG. ST#12,84,73 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS MISC TOOLS & EQUIP FOR MAINT 909-308-1079-FEB-GENERAL USAGE 909-506-2626-FEB-SUB-STATION 909-695-1409-FEB-GENERAL USAGE 909-695-3539-FEB-GENERAL USAGE 909-699-1370-FEB-CABOOSE 909-699-2309-FEB-GENERAL USAGE FEB ACCESS RVSD CO. OPEN LINE MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES ASBESTOS INSPECTION-42220 6TH PUB:THE BUDGETING BOOK;FINANCE SPONSORSHIP-CA. TRAVEL MKT MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES RECRUITMENT ADVERTISING JAN PROF SRVCS-RCSP SIDEWALK JAN PROF SRVCS-RCSP SIDEWALK TEMP HELP W/E 2/22 MILES TEMP HELP W/E 2/22 MILES MISC P.W. MAINT SUPPLIES AIR:LEGISLATOR CF:FORD 3/21-24 AIR:LEGIS.CF-COMERCHERO 3/21-4 FACADE IMPROV.PRGM:41975 4TH VARIOUS PARKS-LIGHTING REPAIR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS FEB PRESS CLIPPING SERVICE TEMP HELP W/E 02/08 ROBINSON TEMP HELP W/E 02/08 ROBINSON DESIGN/CAL TRAVEL MARKET AD TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-171-999-5228 190-180-999-5212 001-164-601-5218 320-199-999-5208 001-170-999-5229 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-110-999-5223 320-199-999-5208 320-199-999-5208 001-171-999-5242 165-199-999-5250 001-140-999-5228 280-199-999-5270 320-199-999-5221 001-150-999-5254 210-190-154-5802 210-190-154-5802 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 001-164-601-5218 001-100-999-5258 001-100-999-5258 280-199-813-5804 190-180-999-5212 190-183-999-5330 280-199-999-5250 165-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5118 280-199-999-5270 190-183-999-5330 ITEM AMOUNT 74.91 88.94 31.42 60.23 275.13 102.20 39.87 149.82 38.32 309.00 10.80 1,436.50 39.50 2,500.00 672.36 64.80 2,968.75 1,610.00 54.60 163.80 212.55 754.00 754.00 7,910.00 633.50 193.80 155.66 46.44 46.44 35.14 96.00 PAGE 3 CHECK AMOUNT 74.91 120.36 665.57 309.00 10.80 1,436.50 39.50 2,500.00 672.36 64.80 4,578.75 218.40 212.55 1,508.00 7,910.00 633.50 193.80 155.66 92.88 35.14 96.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/12/98 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48334 03/12/98 MUERI, CORNELIA REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 48334 03/12/98 MUERI, CORNELIA ADD~L ROOM RENTAL CHARGE 190-183-4990 10.00- 90.00 48335 03/12/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES RDA BONDS: ARBITRAGE SERVICES 380-199-999-5248 1,253.00 1,253.00 48336 03/12/98 002727 MUNICIPAL MGMT ASSIST 0 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL:YATES,GRANT 001-110-999-5226 40.00 40.00 48337 03/12/98 MUNICIPAL TREASURERS~ A BK:REVISIONS TO DEBT POLICY HB 001-140-999-5228 25.00 25.00 48338 03/12/98 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS AND SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5218 45.24 48338 03/12/98 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS AND SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5218 4.84 48338 03/12/98 002925 NAPA AUTO PARTS MISC PARTS AND SUPPLIES:PW 001-164-601-5218 4.29 54.37 48339 03/12/98 003139 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS INSTALL SHELF IN PC ROOM 320-199-999-5215 48339 03/12/98 003139 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS BUILD/INSTALL SHELFS:COMPUTER 320-199-999-5215 116.00 116.00 232.00 48340 03/12/98 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT FEB CONSTRUCTION UPDATES 001-165-999-5256 172.22 48340 03/12/98 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES - AT 1 YR NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 280-199-999-5228 74.88 247.10 48341 03/12/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-163-999-5214 115.52 48341 03/12/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 190-180-999-5214 18.50 134.02 48342 03/12/98 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES FEB LDSCP MAINT:DUCK POND 190-180-999-5212 800.00 800.00 48343 03/12/98 002652 OSCAR'S LUNCH FOR MGMT WORKSHOP 2/26 001-150-999-5260 183.45 48343 03/12/98 002652 OSCAR'S SERVER CHARGE FOR MGMT WRKSHP 001-150-999-5260 55.00 48343 03/12/98 002652 OSCAR'S TAX 001-150-999-5260 14.22 252.67 48344 03/12/98 003069 PACK N MAIL #2 MAR 98 DAILY MAIL DELIVERY 330-199-999-5250 35.00 35.00 48345 03/12/98 PELKA, GRACE REFUND: TWO DAY ART CAMP 190-183-4982 22.00 22.00 48346 03/12/98 000580 PHOTO WORKS FILM & PHOTO DEVELOPING 190-180-999-5301 11.57 11.57 48347 03/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN FEB ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION UPDAT 001-165-999-5256 112.00 48347 03/12/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN RECRUITMENT ADS:VARIOUS JOBS 001-150-999-5254 444.68 556.68 48348 03/12/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL FOR P.W. DEPT 001-164-601-5238 26.88 48348 03/12/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIP RENTAL FOR PW DEPT 001-164-601-5238 44.76 71.64 48349 03/12/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 154.02 48349 03/12/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 90.70 244.72 48350 03/12/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL FOR CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 114.40 48350 03/12/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL-CRC 190-182-999-5250 107.00 48350 03/12/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL-MAINT FACIL 340-199-702-5212 44.80 48350 03/12/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL-SR. CENTER 190-181-999-5250 54.28 48350 03/12/98 002930 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPP FLOOR MAT RENTAL-TCC 190-184-999-5250 69.40 389.88 48351 03/12/98 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT CO. BACKHOE RENTAL FOR PUBLIC WRKS 001-164-601-5214 200.00 200.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/12/98 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48352 03/12/98 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RUBBER STAMP - APPROVED 001-162-999-5222 48352 03/12/98 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF RUBBER STAMP - RSA FEES DUE 001-162-999-5222 48352 03/12/98 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SALES TAX 001-162-999-5222 26.70 20.70 3.67 51.07 48353 03/12/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS:OVERLAND DR OVRCRSS 001-1280 48353 03/12/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BLUEPRINTS:RANCHO CA RD PRJT 210-165-601-5804 48353 03/12/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C 36" BOND PAPER FOR ENG. COPIER 330-199-999-5220 48353 03/12/98 000947 RANCHO BELL BLUEPRINT C BOND PAPER FOR PLANNING DEPT 001-161-999-5224 170.63 11.49 34.35 32.52 248.99 48354 03/12/98 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PARK A APR/MAY/JUN BUSINESS PRK ASSOC 340-199-701-5226 919.00 919.00 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30205-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-30206-0 SIXTH ST 001-164-603-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-06-84860-5 PUJOL STREET 280-199-807-5804 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02-98000-0 PRKVW STATION 001-171-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-02'98010-0 001-171'999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-181-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-182-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-184-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999'5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 48355 03/12/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 340-199-701-5240 48356 03/12/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-162-999-5214 48356 03/12/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5214 48356 03/12/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-110-999-5263 48356 03/12/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 001-163-999-5214 48356 03/12/98 000907 RANCHO CAR WASH VEHICLE DETAILING & MAINT. 190-180-999'5214 20.98 28.38 40.58 9.62 76.22 737.49 79.47 327.74 88.30 81.20 716.65 295.58 21.00 6.00 14.85 19.22 20.00 2,502.21 81.07 48357 03/12/98 000266 RIGHTWAY PORTABLE TOILET RENTAL:RVRTN P 190-180-999-5238 62.89 62.89 48358 03/12/98 001592 RIVERSIDE CO. INFORMATI JAN RADIO RENTAL FOR CODE ENFR 001-162-999-5238 361.55 361.55 48359 03/12/98 000357 RIVERSIDE CO. TRANSPORT 3RD QTR TRAFFIC MAINT AGREEMNT 001-164-602-5405 3,195.00 3,195.00 48360 03/12/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SR ENGINEER AD N0.004610946 001-150-999-5254 299.00 48360 03/12/98 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE BUILD INSPECTOR AD 004650361 001-150-999-5254 316.25 615.25 48361 03/12/98 000403 SHAWN SCOTT POOL & SPA POOL MAINT-TEM ELEM SCHOOL 190-180-999-5212 331.65 331.65 48362 03/12/98 SLEEPER, CARLA REFUND: VOLLEY CLINICS 190-183-4982 48363 03/12/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CNTRL SERVS:CITY HALL 340-199-701-5250 48363 03/12/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CNTRL SERV:STATION # 84 001-171-999-5212 48363 03/12/98 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR PEST CNTRL SERVS:SR. CENTER 190-181-999-5250 56.00 48.00 29.00 133.00 48364 03/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 2-10-331-2153 PUJOL ST 190-184-999-5240 641.82 48364 03/12/98 000537 SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON 66-77-795-6412-01 FRONT ST 340-199-701-5240 26.55 48365 03/12/98 003176 STORMWATER QUALITY TASK MTG:NPDES-3/13 G. ALEGRIA 001-163-999-5261 25.00 668.37 25.00 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/12/98 08:25 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAHE DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48366 03/12/98 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 346.50 48366 03/12/98 000465 STRADLEY, MARY KATHLEEN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 140.00 486.50 48367 03/12/98 000700 TEMECULA ARTS COUNCIL 97-98 COMM SERVICE FUNDING 001-101-999-5267 10,000.00 10,000.00 48368 03/12/98 001672 TEMECULA DRAIN SERV & P RR WTR HEATER @ RANCHO SPT PRK 190-180-999-5212 340.00 340.00 48369 03/12/98 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY CO. PLAQUE FOR "CHILI COOKOFF" 280-199-999-5362 6.85 6.85 48370 03/12/98 000314 TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM DRAW REQUEST-CHAPEL & WTRLINE 210-190-808-5804 12,250.61 12,250.61 48371 03/12/98 001687 TEMECULA VALLEY PONY/CO 97-98 COMM SERVICE FUNDING 001-101-999-5267 2,500.00 2,500.00 48372 03/12/98 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKNON TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 187.20 187.20 48373 03/12/98 TEMECULA VLLY HS ASSOC REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-183-4990 100.00 100.00 48374 03/12/98 002396 U S LONG DISTANCE, INC. LONG DISTANCE TELECOM PROVIDER 320-199-999-5208 1,422.32 1,422.32 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CAL[F, N. 5415305001995902 JS 001-100-999-5258 325.00 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CAL[F, N. 5415305001995894 RR 001-100-999-5260 28.37 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995894 RR 001-100-999-5258 136.00 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995910 RB 001-110-999-5263 106.97 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995910 RB 001-110-999-5258 327.80 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995936 GR 001-140-999-5258 69.04 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995985 GY 001-150-999-5260 92.04 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5258 255.00 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. 5415305001995969 GT 001-161-999-5272 150.00 48375 03/12/98 002621 UNION BANK OF CALIFt N. 5415305001995951 SN 190-180-999-5260 21.58 48376 03/12/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS HP OFFICEJET 630 320-199-999-5242 589.00 48376 03/12/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5242 45.65 48376 03/12/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SONY DIGITAL CAMERA 320-199-999-5221 700.00 48376 03/12/98 002566 VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS SALES TAX 320-199-999-5221 54.25 48377 03/12/98 003114 WASKA, CAROLYN TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNING 190-183-999-5330 321.60 1,511.80 1,388.90 321.60 48378 03/12/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 10.94 48378 03/12/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINT SUPPLIES-MAINT FACILITY 340-199-702-5212 20.54 48378 03/12/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINT SUPPLIES - CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 190.86 48378 03/12/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 100.26 48378 03/12/98 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SR. CTR. 190-181-999-5212 87.55 410.15 48379 03/12/98 002109 WHITE CAP MISC MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW 001-164-601-5218 245.28 245.28 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILLI 5765 COLOR COPIER USAGE 330-199-999-5217 596.43 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] 5765 COLOR COPIER USAGE 330-199-999-5217 430.42 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT 330-199-999-5391 635.41 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT 330-2800 1,840.32 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT 330-199-999-5217 1,370.95 48380 03/12/98 000345 XEROX CORPORATION BILL] DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT 330-199-999-5391 634.35 VOUCHRE2 03/12/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 48380 08:25 CHECK DATE 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 03/12/98 VENDOR NUMBER 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 000345 VENDOR NAME XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX XEROX CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILL! CORPORATION BILLi CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLi CORPORATION BILLI CORPORATION BILLI CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT DCS-35 COPIER NOV-FEB LEASE PT DCS-35 COPIER NOV-FEB LEASE PT DCS-35 COPIER NOV-FEB LEASE PT DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT DCS-35 NOV-FEB LEASE PMT LEASE OF 5021 COPIER @ CRC 5100 COPIER: DEC 97 LEASE PMT 5100 COPIER: DEC 97 LEASE PMT ACCOUNT NUMBER 330-2800 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5391 330-2800 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5391 330-2800 330-199-999-5217 190-182-999-5239 330-199-999-5391 330-2800 ITEM AMOUNT 1,837.27 1,368.59 674.97 1,954.92 1,455.99 692.91 2,006.87 1,489.54 67.08 535.02 1,585.01 PAGE 7 CHECK AMOUNT 19,176.05 TOTAL CHECKS 117,491.57 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 12:45 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE 10 FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA DEV- LOW/NOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 90,346.50 136,710.23 49,138.43 13,036.50 66.32 9,982.95 488.13 14,465.63 36,326.07 345.84 6,355.59 2,767.23 2,972.77 TOTAL 363,002.19 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48381 03/12/98 000152 CALIFORNIA PARKS & RECR CPRS CF:HUTER,J:03/13/98 190-180-999-5261 209.00 209.00 48382 03/16/98 001089 CALIFORNIA DEBT & INVES BOND SALE SEM:4/2-3 MCDERMOTT 001-140-999-5261 150.00 150.00 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 001-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 165-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 190-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 191-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 192-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 193-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 194-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 280-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 300-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 320-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 330-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 FEDERAL 340-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 001-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 165-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 190-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 191-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 192-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 193-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 194-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 280-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 300-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX ¢IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 320-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX ¢IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 330-2070 936972 03/19/98 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 000283 MEDICARE 340-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 001-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 165-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 190-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 SDI 340-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 001-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 165-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 190-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 191-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 192-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 193-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 194-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 280-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 300-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 320-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 330-2070 985981 03/19/98 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 000444 STATE 340-2070 48385 03/19/98 001985 48386 03/19/98 001916 48387 03/19/98 003162 A E P (ASSOC OF ENVIRO ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIAT B H E TECHNICAL STAFFIN MEMBERSHIP DUES 98 D. HOGAN CONSULTANT FEE FOR CFD 88-12 TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/27 HAWKINS 001-161-999-5226 001-1287 001-163-999-5118 14,673.35 718.24 3,452.91 8.84 22.97 299.78 136.78 602.89 83.25 606.38 115.77 413.80 3,704.79 189.43 1,049.89 2.38 6.14 75.42 36.46 158.57 24.12 124.78 28.34 125.14 26.70 10.18 54.89 5.18 3,785.53 216.75 768.77 1.55 3.77 58.27 23.96 204.71 21.15 137.27 25.13 84.95 80.00 250.00 735.00 26,660.42 5,428.76 80.00 250.00 735.00 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 48388 48388 48388 48388 48388 48388 48389 48390 48390 48390 48391 48392 48392 48393 48394 48395 48396 48397 48397 48397 48397 48397 48398 48399 48400 48400 48401 48401 48402 48403 48403 48404 48405 12:45 CHECK DATE 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS VENDOR NUMBER 000622 000622 000622 000622 000622 000622 001950 002541 002541 002541 001201 001004 000137 003184 003161 000864 000864 000864 000864 000864 003182 VENDOR ITEM NAME DESCRIPTION BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE-A/C BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER OUTLETS-PHONES/COMPUTER - TCC BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BANTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BAHTA ELECTRIC-REFRIGER BECHTEL MAINTENANCE SER BECKER, WALTER KARL BECKER, WALTER KARL BECKER, WALTER KARL BUSINESS WEEK CALIFORNIA DIETETIC ASN CALIFORNIA DIETETIC ASN CALIFORNIA DEPT OF FISH CHEVRON U S A INC. COACHELLA VALLY HOUSING COMMUNITY PROFILE & FAC CORONA CLAY CO., INC. CORONA CLAY CO., INC. CORONA CLAY CO., INC. CORONA CLAY CO., INC. CORONA CLAY CO.~ INC. CUB SCOUT PACK #338 002106 DA FAMILY SUPPORT 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 001380 E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVIC 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE 002809 EXPERIAN 000478 FAST SIGNS ELECTRICAL SERVICES-PARKS ELECTRICAL SERVICES - CRC C.R.C.-ELECTRICAL SERVICES ELECTRICAL SERVICES-PARKS CLEAN DOORS/CANOPY-CITY HALL R.O.W. EROSION REPAIRS/WALCOTT R.O.W. EROSION REPAIRS/WALCOTT R.O.W. EROSION REPAIRS/WALCOTT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL:BUS. WEEK REFUND:ROOM RENTAL/SEC DEPOSIT REFUND:ROOM RENTAL/SEC DEPOSIT EXT-1603-1ST ST BRIDGE PW95-08 FUEL EXPENSE FOR CITY VEHICLES FINANCIAL ASST-RANCHO WEST APT COMM PROFILE & FACIL WEB SITE ANGEL MIX FOR SPORTS PARK MOUND MIX FOR SPORTS PARK SALES TAX ANGEL MIX-PALOMA DEL SOL PARK SALES TAX 98 COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING 002106 SUPPORT JAN CITATION PROCESSING JAN CITATION PROCESSING TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/27 DONAHOE TEMP HELP (2)W/E 2/27 DEGANGE WATER SERVICE-DIEGO DR LDSC FEB LDSC MAINT-PARKS FEB LDSC MAINT-SLOPES CREDIT APS FOR RDA MAGNETIC CAR SIGNS-C.M.VEHICLE ACCOUNT NUMBER 340-199-701-5250 190-184-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-182-999-5212 190-182-999'5212 190-180'999-5212 340-199-701-5250 001-164-601-5402 001-164-601-5402 001-164-601-5402 001-110-999-5228 190-2900 190-183-4990 280-199-804-5802 190-180-999-5263 165-199-812-5804 280-199-999-5250 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190-180-999-5212 190'180'999'5212 190-180-999-5212 001-101-999-5267 190-2140 001-140-999-5250 001-170-999-5250 001-161-999-5118 001-161-999-5118 193-180-999-5240 190'180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 280-199-999-5250 001-110-999-5278 ITEM AMOUNT 1,200.00 475.00 67.50 99.51 290.49 56.70 50.00 2,018.00 2,662.71 1,715.58 55.08 100.00 75.00 109.00 10.63 130,000.00 500.00 2,975.00 450.00 265.44 1,700. O0 131.75 2,000. O0 82.50 237.88 237.87 2,949.21 2,744.46 7.72 8,961.00 8,813.00 100.00 121.76 PAGE 2 CHECK AMOUNT 2,189.20 50.00 6,396.29 55.08 175.00 109.00 10.63 130,000.00 500.00 5,522.19 2,000.00 82.50 475.75 5,693.67 7.72 17,774.00 100.00 121.76 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AHOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48406 03/19/98 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL M PRE-EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 001-164-601-5250 135.00 135.00 48407 03/19/98 002340 FIRST TRUST CALIFORNIA CFD88-12 PMT#2 97/98 DUCK POND 190-180-999-5275 9,854.36 9,854.36 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-150-999-5220 13.45 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-150-999-5220 125.00 48408 03/19/98 000170 FP~ANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-150-999-5220 28.00 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-150-999-5220 2.97 48/,08 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, 1998 PLANNER SEASONS RENEWAL 001-150-999-5220 28.00 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SHIPPING AND HANDLING 001-150-999-5220 10.40 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SALES TAX 001-150-999-5220 16.11 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, DAY PLANNER BINDERS & REFILLS 001-110-999-5220 13.45 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, FREIGHT 001-110-999-5220 5.40 48408 03/19/98 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY, SALES TAX 001-110-999-5220 1.46 244.24 48409 03/19/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-506-1941-MAR-TTA CSD 320-199-999-5208 62.83 48409 03/19/98 00018/, G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-0590-FEB-TTA ALARM 320-199-999-5208 61.66 48409 03/19/98 000184 G T E CALIFORNIA - PAYM 909-699-2811-MAR-GENERAL USAGE 320-199-999-5208 1,290.49 1,414.98 48410 03/19/98 001355 G T E CALIFORNIA, INC. MNT ACCESS-RVSD CO. OPEN LINE 320-199-999-5208 280.83 280.83 48411 03/19/98 001937 GALLS, INC. CLIP-ON TELEPHONE CASES 001-162-999-5242 33.98 33.98 48412 03/19/98 002141 GELS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214 100.00 48412 03/19/98 002141 GEIS, PAUL MOTORCYCLE REPAIR CITY POLICE 001-170-999-5214 225.00 325.00 48413 03/19/98 002528 GLASS BLASTERS REPLACEMENT OF GLASSES FOR MTG 001-100-999-5260 43.10 43.10 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-110-999-5220 22.63 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES - FINANCE DEPT 001-140-999-5220 163.67 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-150-999-5220 138.52 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-161-999-5220 202.87 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5220 141.35 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT SUPPLIES FOR SKATE PARK: 190-183-999-5305 2.38 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES FOR CRC 190-182-999-5220 136.35 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 190-180-999-5220 270.13 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT MISC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5220 80.44 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR RDA DEPT. 280-199-999-5220 124.63 48414 03/19/98 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR RDA DEPT. 165-199-999-5220 124.63 1,407.60 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. FLOURESCENT LIGHT TUBES 001-171-999-5242 161.73 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-171-999-5242 15.32 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. SALES TAX 001-171-999-5242 6.66 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-CITY HALL 340-199-701-5212 223.08 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 883.95 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES 001-162-999-5214 9.90 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 611.96 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE~ INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES-SEN CNTR 190-181-999-5212 47.21 48415 03/19/98 000186 HANKS HARDWARE, INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES - TCC 190-184-999-5212 207.49 48416 03/19/98 003117 HARRISON LAMINATES & 140 CRC DOOR REPAIRS 190-182-999-5212 534.00 2,167.30 534.00 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 48417 03/19/98 003156 48418 03/19/98 000194 48418 03/19/98 000194 48418 03/19/98 000194 48418 03/19/98 000194 48419 03/19/98 003183 48420 03/19/98 001407 48421 03/19/98 000199 48422 03/19/98 002695 48423 03/19/98 002909 48424 03/19/98 003166 48425 03/19/98 001667 48425 03/19/98 001667 48426 03/19/98 003185 48427 03/19/98 002187 48428 03/19/98 002420 48429 03/19/98 000210 48430 03/19/98 002933 48430 03/19/98 002933 48431 03/19/98 003054 48431 03/19/98 003054 48431 03/19/98 003054 48432 03/19/98 002664 48432 VENDOR NAME HERNANDEZ, RICHARD I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS I C M A RETIREMENT TRUS INSTITUTE OF TRAFFIC EN INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPL INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC J A S PACIFIC CONSULTIN K W C ENGINEERING, INC. KELLY PAPER COMPANY KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICE KEN MONTGOMERY & SONS C LAKE ELSINORE ANIMAL FR LAURSEN ELECTRICAL CO., LEAGUE OF CAL. CITIES - LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP LINSCOTT, LAW & GREENSP LYNDE-ORDWAY LYNDE-OROWAY LYNDE-ORDWAY MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC. 03/19/98 002664 MAR-CO INDUSTRIES, INC. 48433 03/19/98 003090 48434 03/19/98 002011 48434 03/19/98 002011 48434 03/19/98 002011 48435 03/19/98 003032 48435 03/19/98 003032 48435 03/19/98 003032 MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL MARTIN, ICATHARINA E. MARTIN, ICRTHARINA E. MARTIN, KATHARINA E. MERLO SAFE & HUSKEY VAU MERLO SAFE & HUSKEY VAU MERLO SAFE & HUSKEY VAU 48436 03/19/98 001290 MEYER, JOHN CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION REISSUE CK#47966:RES REHAB PGM 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP 000194 DEF COMP MEMBERSHIP DUES 98 H. BAHA POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS 000199 IRS GARN FEB TEMP HELP-LEONARD/MARTINEZ DESIGN SRVCS-RCSP SIDEWALK MISC PAPER SUPPLIES TEMP HELP W/E 3/1 MILES TEMP HELP W/E 3/1 MILES FACADE IMPROV.PRGM:28475 FRONT FEB ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES SIGN-REBUILD EXISTING PEDESTAL RENEW AIRFARE TICKETS JAN-SIGNAL DESIGN-PALA RD JAN SIGNAL DESIGN-PAUBA RD TRIUMPH MANUAL CUTTER CHALLENGE PAPER DRILL SALES TAX TRACTOR PREVENTIVE MAINT SERV TRACTOR PREVENTIVE MAINT SERV OLD TWN CHOIR PERFORMANCE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS WITHHOLDING FOR NSF CK #524 WITHHOLDING FOR NSF CK #524 CASHIERtS DEPOSITORY SAFE FREIGHT SALES TAX REIMB:IDA MID-WINTER WKSP:2/9 ACCOUNT NUMBER 165-199-813-5804 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 280-2080 001-164-602-5226 190-182-999-5212 001-2140 001-162-999-5118 210-190-154-5802 330-199-999-5220 001-163-999-5118 001-164-604-5118 280-199-813-5804 001-172-999-5255 210-199-130-5802 001-100-~-5258 210-165-689-5802 210-165-692-5802 330-1940 330-1940 330-1940 190-182-999-5215 190-182-999-5215 280-199-999-5362 190-183-999-5330 001-1190 001-199-4061 001-140-999-5242 001-140-999-5242 001-140-999-5242 165-199-999-5261 ITEM AMOUNT 1,800.00 1,460.68 18.75 125.00 6.25 158.00 499.85 317.54 4,845.20 1,077.50 68.96 72.80 218.40 550.00 2,377.94 1,970.00 20.00 1,562.75 1,562.75 1,099.00 1,050.00 166.55 221.98 80.61 100.00 572.00 80.00- 15.00 650.00 115.00 50.38 185.97 PAGE 4 CHECK AMOUNT 1,800.00 1,610.68 158.00 499.85 317.54 4,845.20 1,077.50 68.96 291.20 550.00 2,377.94 1,970.00 20.00 3,125.50 2,315.55 302.59 100.00 507.00 815.38 185.97 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER ITEM AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48437 03/19/98 001905 MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 190-183-999-5330 544.00 544.00 48438 03/19/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM APR LEASE:MINOLTA COPIER CRC 48438 03/19/98 002952 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEM SALES TAX 190-182-999-5239 190-182-999-5239 151.00 11.70 162.70 48439 03/19/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS 48439 03/19/98 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS B/W BUSINESS CARDS:POLICE DEPT 001-170-999-5222 SALES TAX 001-170-999-5222 841.50 65.22 906.72 48440 03/19/98 MOMS CLUB OF TEMECULA V REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 48441 03/19/98 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING CLEAN CULVERT UNDER STREET 001-164-601-5401 948.00 948.00 48442 03/19/98 000230 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES JAN-MAR COHM FAC DIST ADMIN SV 001-1280 1,700.00 1,700.00 48443 03/19/98 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS ATV REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 48443 03/19/98 001213 MURRIETA MOTORSPORTS ATV REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 001-170-999-5214 68.99 68.99 137.98 48444 03/19/98 003139 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMPUTER EQUIP:TIME CLOCK ANTE 320-199-999-5215 116.00 116.00 48445 03/19/98 00127-/ NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITI PUBLICATION:TECH & COMMUNITIES 001-100-999-5228 20.00 20.00 48446 03/19/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM QTY 1000 CASH RECEIPTS 001-140-999-5222 48446 03/19/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM FREIGHT 001-140-999-5222 48446 03/19/98 001584 NEWPORT PRINTING SYSTEM SALES TAX 001-140-999-5222 244.41 6.41 18.94 269.76 48447 03/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 48447 03/19/98 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE REPAIRS & MAINT 001-162-999-5214 001-165-999-5214 15.95 36.03 51.98 48448 03/19/98 003003 OWENS, JEFF SAND FOR PUBLIC SAND BAG USE 001-164-601-5401 210.11 210.11 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 165-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 280-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI FURNITURE FOR CITY MGR OFFICE 165-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER1 FURNITURE FOR CITY MGR OFFICE 280-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER! FREIGHT 001-110-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI SALES TAX 001-110-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 165-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 280-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER[ FURNITURE FOR MAINT YARD 210-190-144-5804 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER[ REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 165-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER[ REMODELING/FURNITURE RDA DEPT 280-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTERI CREDIT:WRNG CHAIRS/CANCEL ITEM 165-199-999-5601 48449 03/19/98 002406 PACIFIC BUSINESS INTER[ CREDIT:WRNG CHAIRS/CANCEL ITEM 280-199-999-5601 48450 03/19/98 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 001-170-999-5238 48450 03/19/98 001561 PAGENET MNTHY PAGING SERV & RENTAL 190-180-999-5238 647.85 1,943.54 970.32 970.32 150.00 162.02 870.62 870.62 3,131.50 62.22- 186.64- 120.00- 120.00- 3.00 31.83 9,227.93 34.83 48451 03/19/98 000359 PARKER, HERMAN REIMB:CPRS CF:03/12-03/14 190-180-999-5258 135.74 135.74 48452 03/19/98 PENFOLD COMM REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT 190-2900 100.00 100.00 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 12:45 CHECK DATE VENDOR NUMBER VENDOR NAME CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 MLT PERS 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 PERS RET 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 PERS-PRE 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE 000246 SURVIVOR 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS PICKUP ADJ 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS PICKUP ADJ 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES~ RETIRE PERS PICKUP ADJ 48453 03/19/98 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIRE PERS PICKLIP ADJ 48454 03/19/98 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PRO 001958 PERS L-T 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 48455 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 000249 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-2130 001-2390 165-2390 190-2390 191-2390 192-2390 193-2390 194-2390 280-2390 300-2390 320-2390 330-2390 340-2390 001-150-999-5102 190-180-999-5102 190-180-999-5102 340-199-701-5102 001-2122 001-140-999-5220 001-150-999-5265 001-171-999-5261 001-170-999-5214 001-170-999-5214 001-161-999-5220 001-171-999-5242 190-183-999-5380 001-164-601-5218 001-164o601-5250 001-120-999-5260 001-170-999-5242 001-161-999-5260 190-183-999-5320 001-110-999-5260 001-110-999-5223 190-183-999-5320 001-162o999-5220 ITEM AMOUNT 322.43 20,035.19 790.85 4,006.76 13.12 32.40 405.28 195.26 911.68 131.86 650.10 129.58 468.59 238.31 73.11 1.75 14.78 .05 .14 1.54 .84 2.43 .46 1.86 .93 2.18 9.20 45.32 3.23 16.17 49.85 19.40 50.00 50.00 4.43 18.21 3.20 3.63 7.10 18.81 34.00 11.15 16.99 8.75 42.29 9.57 9.58 11.22 5.28 PAGE 6 CHECK AMOUNT 28,505.40 49.85 VOUCHRE2 CITY OF TEMECULA 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS PAGE VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR VENDOR ITEM ACCOUNT ITEM NUMBER DATE NUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT CHECK AMOUNT 48455 03/19/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-183-999-5370 29.94 48455 03/19/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-170-999-5214 16.15 48455 03/19/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 190-180-999-5212 35.32 48455 03/19/98 000249 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 001-164-601-5218 30.00 435.02 48457 03/19/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-165-999-5230 42.75 48457 03/19/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001'120'999-5230 34.40 48457 03/19/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-120-999-5277 81.55 48457 03/19/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 001-161-999-5230 53.75 48457 03/19/98 000253 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL & POSTAL SERVS 190-180-999-5230 10.75 223.20 48458 03/19/98 003165 PRECISION PAINTING FACADE IMPRVMNT PRGM:THE BANK 280-199-813-5804 9,390.00 9,390.00 48459 03/19/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA98-0019 001-161-999-5256 18.00 48459 03/19/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: WINCH HILLS FIN 001-120-999-5256 95.00 48459 03/19/98 000254 PRESS-ENTERPRISE COMPAN PUBLIC NOTICE: PA97-0414 001-161-999-5256 19.00 132.00 48460 03/19/98 002110 PRIME EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL - PARKS 190-180-999-5238 126.76 126.76 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME NATRIX, INC. SC-5001339-0 KL 001-100-999-5208 78.71 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002361-3 PB 001-100-999-5208 5.79 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001322-6 RB 001-110-999-5208 29.60 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5002330-8 CITY VAN 190-180-999-5208 31.10 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5001377-0 SR VAN 190-180-999-5208 42.79 48461 03/19/98 002776 PRIME MATRIX, INC. SC-5003948-6 INFO SYSTEM 320-199-999-5208 27.67 215.66 48462 03/19/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - T.C.C. 190-184-999-5212 61.16 48462 03/19/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - PARKS 190-180-999-5212 46.28 48462 03/19/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 464.14 48462 03/19/98 000255 PRO LOCK & KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES - CRC 190-182-999-5212 75.00 646.58 48463 03/19/98 QUALITY SHEDS OVRCHARGED PERMIT:B97-2026 001-2290 .49 48463 03/19/98 QUALITY SHEDS OVRCHARGED PERMIT:B97-2026 001-162-4200 24.38 48463 03/19/98 QUALITY SHEDS OVRCHARGED PERMIT:B97-2026 001-162-4285 32.50 57.37 48464 03/19/98 002612 RADIO SHACK, INC. MISC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 320-199-999-5221 55.53 55.53 48465 03/19/98 000728 RAMSEY BACKFLOW & PLUMB LDSCP REPAIRS @ VARIOUS SITES 193-180-999-5415 30.00 30.00 48466 03/19/98 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SWIVEL CLIPS W/MYLAR STRAP 340-199-701-5242 140.00 48466 03/19/98 000260 RAN-TEC RUBBER STAMP MF SALES TAX 340-199-701-5242 10.85 150.85 48467 03/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 01-17-80000-1 VIA EDUARDO-LSCP 001-164-601-5250 26.10 48467 03/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 190-180-999-5240 137.65 48467 03/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 191-180-999-5240 41.27 48467 03/19/98 000262 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER VARIOUS WATER METERS 193-180-999-5240 266.87 471.89 48468 03/19/98 RANCHO MIRAGE, CITY OF LEAGUE MTG:J.C,S.F,R.R. 3/25 001-100-999-5260 48469 03/19/98 002907 REINHART-FONTES ASSOC., REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL:COMM LND 280-199-999-5248 90.00 2,500.00 90.00 2,500.00 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 12:45 VOUCHER/ CHECK CHECK VENDOR NUMBER DATE NUMBER 48470 03/19/98 002073 48471 03/19/98 001046 48472 03/19/98 000352 48473 03/19/98 000418 48474 03/19/98 000873 484?5 03/19/98 002937 48476 03/19/98 002451 48477 03/19/98 000645 48477 03/19/98 000645 48478 03/19/98 000519 48479 03/19/98 000374 48480 03/19/98 000537 48480 03/19/98 000537 48480 03/19/98 000537 48480 03/19/98 000537 48480 03/19/98 000537 48480 03/19/98 000537 48481 03/19/98 000521 48482 03/19/98 48483 03/19/98 002150 48483 03/19/98 002150 48484 03/19/98 000305 48484 03/19/98 000305 48485 03/19/98 000307 48486 03/19/98 000876 48487 03/19/98 003140 48488 03/19/98 001483 48488 03/19/98 001483 48488 03/19/98 001483 48488 03/19/98 001483 48489 03/19/98 VENDOR NAME RESOURCE GROUP, THE REXON, FREEDMAN, KLEPET RIVERSIDE CO. ASSESSOR RIVERSIDE CO. CLERK & R ROBERTS, RONALD N. SACKETT CONSTRUCTION SKYTEC SMART & FINAL, INC. SMART & FINAL, INC. SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTR SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON SOUTHERN CALIF EDISON STEMART, BRUCE M. STRAUSHEIM, STEVEN SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS SUMMIT SAFETY PRODUCTS TARGET STORE TARGET STORE TEMECULA TROPHY CO. TEMECULA VALLEY BALLOON TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKNON TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOM DODSON & ASSOCIATES TOSTADO, EVA CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION JOB SKILLS & CENSUS FINAL PRGS FEB 98 PROF LEGAL SERVS ASSESSOR MAP COPIES NOTICE OF EXEMPTION:OLD TWN ST REIMB:NAT~L LEAGUE CF:3/6-3/10 CONSTRUCT BRON DITCH @ PAUBA R REL STP NOTICE:TODD PIPE & SUP SUPPLIES FOR RECREATION PRGMS SUPPLIES FOR TCSD CLASSES PEST CONTROL SERVICES - TCC 6077-2040 MARGARITA ELECT SERV 2-10-331-1353 PAUBA RD 2-09-330-3030 WINCH RD TCl 2-09-330-3139 NINCH RD TC1 2-02-351-5281 RANCHO VISTA A 2-01-202-7603 VARIOUS METERS 2-05-791-8807 VARIOUS METERS STREET ADDRESSING SERVICE REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT FIRST AID SUPPLIES - CRC FIRST AIO SUPPLIES - CRC SUPPLIES FOR ~98 SPRG EVENTS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR PW GOOD NEIGHBOR AWARD '98 SPONSERSHIP PER AGREEMENT TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MITIGATION MONITOR:REG CTR PRJ MITIGATION MONITOR:REG CTR PRd MITIGATION MONITOR:CAMPOS VERD MITIGATION MONITOR:CAMPOS VERD REFUND: TE TOTS ACCOUNT NUMBER 280-199-999-5248 001-130-999-5247 190-180-999-5224 280-199-824-5801 001-100-999-5258 001-164-601-5402 210-2038 190-184-999-5301 190-183-999-5320 190-184-999-5250 210-190-119-5802 001-171-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 190-182-999-5240 191-180-999-5319 191-180-999-5319 001-162-999-5250 190-2900 190-182-999-5301 190-182-999-5301 190-180-999-5301 001-164-604-5220 190-180-999-5301 280-199-999-5266 190-183-999-5330 001-2620 001-2620 001-2610 001-2610 190-183-4980 ITEM AMOUNT 1,235.00 516.60 5.50 78.00 118.00 4,586.00 5,012.39 69.39 44.12 36.00 148.74 657.25 190.53 219.81 4,251.08 7,616.05 4,942.90 537.50 100.00 90.51 90.51 159.25 59.25 115.98 15,000.00 140.00 217.50 634.00 217.50 507.75 16.00 PAGE 8 CHECK AMOUNT 1,235.00 516.60 5.50 78.00 118.00 4,586.00 5,012.39 113.51 36.00 148.74 17,877.62 537.50 100.00 181.02 218.50 115.98 15,000.00 140.00 1,576.75 16.00 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48490 48491 48491 48491 48491 48492 48492 48493 48/+93 48494 48494 48494 48494 48494 48494 48494 48495 48495 48496 48496 48496 48496 48496 48496 48497 48498 48498 48499 12:45 CHECK DATE 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 03/19/98 VENDOR NUMBER 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 001065 000389 000389 000389 000389 002923 002923 002621 002621 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 000325 002566 002566 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 001209 002109 000345 000345 000871 VENDOR NAME U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEB$CO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (DEF. C U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S C M /PEBSCO (OBRA) U S RENTALS U S RENTALS UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNION BANK OF CALIF, N. UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY UNITED WAY VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VALLEY MICRO COMPUTERS VAULT INC. THE VAULT INC. THE VAULT INC. THE VAULT INC. THE VAULT INC. THE VAULT INC. THE WHITE CAP XEROX CORPORATION BILLI XEROX CORPORATION BILLI HILTON CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS ITEM DESCRIPTION 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 001065 DEF COMP 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR 000389 PT RETIR FULL SIZE PICK-UP TRUCK RENTAL BALES TAX 5415305001995928 MJM 5415305001995928 MJM 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 UW 000325 U~ 000325 UW 000325 UW PENTIUM II - 266 SERVER SALES TAX CART CTNR ' T20 ARCHIVAL DATA STORAGE MICROBOX ARCHIVAL APERTURE CARD BOX ARCHIVAL LEASED CTNR/INBERT CONT. 604 LEASED CTNR/MICROBOX 648 APERTURE CARD BOX 686 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES FOR PW 5765 COLOR MACHINE FUSER OI.L SALES TAX HTL:BOND SALE SEM:4/1-2MCDERMT ACCOUNT NUMBER 001-2080 165-2080 190-2080 192-2080 193-2080 194-2080 280-2080 300-2080 320-2080 340-2080 001-2160 165-2160 190-2160 340-2160 001-164-601-5238 001-164-601-5238 280-199-999-5258 280-1990 001-2120 165-2120 190-2120 192-2120 193-2120 194-2120 340-2120 320-1970 320-1970 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-120-999-5277 001-164-601-5218 330-199-999-5217 330-199-999-5217 001-140-999-5261 ITEM AMOUNT 3,985.48 188.39 1,572.96 .75 24.32 90.83 355.07 85.00 666.66 154.83 400.26 152.72 823.22 77.70 651.77 48.52 813.03 106.97 152.00 6.00 34.80 .15 .75 4.00 .30 2,110.00 163.53 416.52 15.48 38.70 48.00 8.00 20.00 14.52 77.00 5.97 173.80 PAGE 9 CHECK AMOUNT 7,124.29 1,453.90 700.29 920.00 198.00 2,273.53 546.70 14.52 82.97 173.80 TOTAL CHECKS 363,002.19 VOUCHRE2 03 / 19/98 13:26 CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIODS PAGE FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND VEHICLES FUND 340 FACILITIES AMOUNT 416,584.67 19,414.00 987.00 11,521.00 80,572.93 89,597.88 496.00 TOTAL 619,173.48 VOUCHRE2 03/19/98 VOUCHER/ CHECK NUMBER 48502 48503 48503 48503 48503 48503 48503 48503 48503 48504 48504 48504 48505 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48506 48507 48507 48507 48507 48508 48509 48510 13:26 CHECK DATE 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 03/31/98 VENDOR NUMBER 001538 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 000126 002898 002898 002898 002993 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 000406 002181 002181 002181 002181 002937 000420 000332 VENDOR NAME ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE MA CALIFORNIA LANDSCAPE HA NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT CO NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT CO NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT CO PARSONS, BRINCKERHOFF, RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFrS RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFFtS RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF~S RIVERSIDE CO. SHERIFF'S RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION RIVERSIDE CONSTRUCTION SACKETT CONSTRUCTION TRANS-PACIFIC CONSULTAN VANDORPE CHOU ASSOCIATE CITY OF TEMECULA VOUCHER/CHECK REGISTER FOR ALL PERIOOS ITEM DESCRIPTION FEB PROF SRVCS-AREAWIDE ITMS FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT-MEDIANS/SLOPES FEB LDSC MAINT. CITY HALL FEB LDSC MAINT-FIRE ST ~84 "PATCH TRUCK" FOR PW MAINT DIV WALK-BEHIND ROLLER:PW MAINT SALES TAX FEB PROF SERVS:WINCH/I-15 CAL-ID 97/98 MEMBER AGENCY ASS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SEARS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS 12/18-01/14 LAW ENFORCE SERVS JANUARY 98 BOOKING FEES FEB PRGSS RANCHO CAL/I-15 PRJT FEB RETENTION:RANCHO CAL/I-15 CREDIT:ITEM ~r~2 WAS OVERSTATED CREDIT:#32 OVERSTATED-RETENTIO R.O.W. EROSION REPAIRS CALLE G JAN PROF SERV:OVRLD DR & MARG FEB 98 PLAN CHECK SERVICES ACCOUNT NUMBER 210-165-640-5802 190-180-999-5415 190-181-999-5415 190-182-999-5415 190-184-999-5415 191-180-999-5415 193-180-999-5415 340-199-701-5415 001-171-999-5212 310-1910 310-1910 310-1910 210-165-697-5802 001-170-999-5284 001-170-999-5288 001-170-999-5299 001-170-999-5298 001-170-999-5294 001-170-999-5289 001-170-999-5291 001-1230 001-170-999-5281 001-170-999-5282 001-170-999-5262 001-170-999-5279 001-170-999-5273 210-165-601-5804 210-2035 210-165-601-5804 210-2035 001-164-601-5402 210-165-681-5802 001-162-999-5248 ITEM AMOUNT 7,095.00 17,250.00 246.00 1,593.00 325.00 987.00 11,521.00 496.00 250.00 78,430.67 10,364.00 803.21 20,629.58 31,806.00 202,366.08 38,772.40 38,502.40 9,721.60 9,625.60 4,565.12 3,260.80 26,390.18 2,825.60 18,093.75 4,086.53 9,052.80 123,420.00 12,342.00- 80,600.00- 8,060.00 9,095.89 14,310.35 8,169.92 PAGE 1 CHECK AMOUNT 7,095.00 32,668.00 89,597.88 20,629.58 399,068.86 38,538.00 9,095.89 14,310.35 8,169.92 TOTAL CHECKS 619,173.48 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN( CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk March 31, 1998 Records Destruction Approval PREPARED BY: Gwyn Flores, Records Coordinator RECOMMENDATION: Approve the scheduled destruction of certain City records in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Records Retention Policy. BACKGROUND: On March 22, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution No. 92-17 which authorizes the destruction of certain City records which have become outdated, obsolete or are excess documents, in compliance with State of California Government Code, Sections 34090 through 34090.7. Attached Exhibit "A," lists duplicate minutes from 1989-1998. These records have been identified within Group III of the retention schedule. The originals are on file in the City Clerk's Office and have been placed on the City's imaging system. The City Attorney has reviewed this request and has signed the Exhibit, as provided for in Resolution No. 92-17. ATTACHMENTS: Destruction of Records Request, Finance Department Exhibit "A", List of Records recommended for destruction R:IFI-ORESIDESTROY. AR 1 3/24/98 TO: Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk FROM: Gwyn Hores, Records Coordinator DATE: March 31, 1998 SUBJECT: Destruction of Records Request Attached is a listing of records maintained in the City Clerk Depa~haent that are eligible for destruction in accordance with the City of Temecula approved Retention Policy. The attached list of records have been identified within Retention Group III, as outlined in Exhibit "1 ". Schedule A, of Resolution No. 92-17. The undersigned have reviewed and approved this destruction request. Pursuant Io the requirements of Government Code Section 34090.5, I hereby give my consent to the destruction of records under 8~e direction of the City Clerk pursuant to the City of Temeeula's adopted Destruction of Obsolete Records Policy. APPROVED: Depas'h~lent Head: APPROVED: City Attorney: Peter Thorson Date R:\Florea\d¢str.req "EXHIBIT A" ITEMS FOR DESTRUCTION City Clerk Department Group HI City Council Minutes TCSD Minutes RDA Minutes (Duplicates) (Duplicates) (Duplicates) 1989-1998 1989-1998 1991-1998 ITEM 5 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE~/~/<L.~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Susan Jones, Acting City Clerk/Director of Support Services~ March 31, 1998 Award of Contract for Remote Access Server PREPARED BY: Thomas Hafeli, Information Systems Administrator RECOMMENDATION: Award a contract for a Compaq ProLiant 850R 6/200H Server with Citrix WinFrame Enterprise 1.7 Remote Access to Inacom Information Systems, San Diego, California in the amount of $14,481.02 BACKGROUND: The City recently completed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the purpose to select a qualified vendor to purchase a remote access solution to allow staff who need to access the City's network resources and programs while away from City facilities. A total of seven proposals were received and reviewed. The proposals ranged from a low of $11,158.24 from Compucom of Los Angeles, California to a high of $24,396.36 submitted by Micro Visions of Irvine, California. Thirty-one RFP packets were mailed, including fourteen to Temecula computer dealers, of which the following seven vendors responded: Vendor Total C)uote Compucom, Los Angeles CompUSA, San Bernardino Inacom Information Systems, San Diego Omni Data, Riverside LPS Computer Service, Escondido IKON Office Solutions, Redlands Micro Visions, Irvine $11,158.24 $14,303.39 $14,481.02 $14,592.08 $21,861.88 $23,055.72 $24,396.36 Inacom Information Systems of San Diego submitted the lowest qualified quote, meeting all the technical specifications of the RFP. Although Compucom of Los Angeles, and CompUSA of San Bernardino quotes were lower, they did not include all the components (i.e., sufficient memory and hard drive storage, or be an authorized agent for the products) as specified in the RFP. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were appropriated in the 1997-98 Fiscal Year Budget for Information Services Internal Service fund to accommodate this purchase. Attachments: Request for Proposal Scope of Work - Inacom, San Diego, CA Equipment Purchase Agreement R: iREMO TEl033198. WPD 1 3/24/98 EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Purchase Agreement ("Agreement") is made as of March 31, 1998, by and between the City of Temecula ("City"), a municipal corporation, and Inacom Information Systems, San Diego, California ("Vendor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Purchase and Sale of Equipment. On and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Contract Documents, Vendor agrees to sell and deliver to City a Remote Access Server as more particularly described in Exhibit A, Description of Equipment, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full (hereafter "Equipment"). 2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price which City agrees to pay to Vendor for the Equipment is $14,481.02. The Purchase Price is final and shall be paid by City to Vendor in accordance with the following schedule: Net 30. 3. Representations and Warranties ,of Vendor. Vendor makes the following representations and warranties to City: a. Authority and Consents. Vendor has the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement. No approvals or consents of any persons are necessary in connection with Vendor's execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, except for such as have been obtained on or prior to the date hereof. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by Vendor have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of Vendor and constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Vendor, enforceable against Vendor in accordance with their respective terms. b. Title and Operating Condition. Vendor has good and marketable tifie to all of the Equipment. All of the Equipment are free and clear of any restrictions on or conditions to transfer or assignment, and City will acquire absolute title to all of the Equipment free and dear of mortgages, liens, pledges, charges, encumbrances, equities, claims, covenants, conditions and restrictions except for such as may be created or granted by City. All of the Equipment are in good operating condition, are free of any defects, and are in conformity with the specifications, descriptions, representations and warranties set forth in the Contract Documents. Vendor is aware that City is purchasing the Equipment for use with a Novell 4.1 network and that City is relying on Vendor's warranties that the Equipment is fit for this purpose and the ordinary purposes for which the Equipment is normally used. c. Full Disclosure. None of the representations and warranties made by Vendor in this Agreement contain or will contain any untrue statement of a material fact, or omits to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. r:~not~\winfiam~.agr I 4. Time of Delivery. The date and time of delivery of the Equipment shall be on or before Thursday, April 30, 1998. 5. Place of Delivery. The Equipment shall be delivered to this location. 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 6. Title and Risk ofloss. Title to and the risk of loss, damage and destruction of the Equipment shall remain with the Vendor until at~er inspection and acceptance of the Equipment by City. 7. Inspection and Acceptance. City shall inspect the Equipment at the time and place of delivery. Such inspection may include reasonable tests and use of the Equipment by City. If, in the determination of City, the Equipment fails to conform to the Agreement IN ANY MANNER OR RESPECT, City shall so notify Vendor within ten (10) days of delivery of the Equipment to City. Failing such notice, the Equipment shall be deemed accepted by City as of the date of receipt. 8. Rejection. In the event of such notice of non-conformity by City pursuant to Section 7, City may, at its option, (1) reject the whole of the Equipment, (2) accept the whole of the Equipment, or (3) accept any commercial unit or units of the Equipment and reject the remainder. The exerdse of any of the above options shall be "without prejudice" and with full reservation of any fights and remedies of City attendant upon a breach. In the event of such notice and election by City, City agrees to comply with all reasonable instructions of Vendor and, in the event that expenses are incurred by City in following such instructions, Vendor shall indemnify City in full for such expenses. 9. No Replacements of Cure. This Agreement calls for strict compliance. Vendor expressly agrees that both the Equipment tendered and the tender itself will conform fully to the terms and conditions of the Agreement on the original tender. In the event of rejection by City of the whole of the Equipment or any part thereof pursuant to Section 8, City may, but is not required to, accept any substitute performance from Vendor or engage in subsequent efforts to effect a cure of the original tender by Vendor. 10. Indemnification. Vendor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, damages, costs and liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of or from the Equipment or Vendoffs maintenance thereof; excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. Contract Documents. a. This Agreement includes the following documents, which are by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof: (1) Request for Proposal dated February 17, 1998, attached hereto as Exhibit B; (2) Vendor's response to the Request for Proposal dated March 9, 1998, attached hereto as Exhibit C. r:~-mot~\winfi-an~.agr 2 b. In the event any term or condition of the Contract Documents conflicts with or is contradictory to any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement are controlling. c. In the event of a conflict in terms between this Agreement, the RFP and/or the Vendor's response to the RFP, this Agreement shall prevail over the RFP and the Vendor's Response to the RFP, and the RFP shall prevail over the Vendor's Response to the RFP. 12. Remedies. The remedies and rights conferred on the City by this Agreement are in addition to and cumulative with all other remedies and rights accorded the City under law or equity. 13. Survival of Representations and Warranties. All representations, warranties, covenants and agreements of the parties contained in this Agreement shall survive the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement. 14. l,egal Responsibilities. The Vendor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Vendor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Vendor to comply with this section. 15. Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by Vendor without the express written consent of City. This Agreement shall be binding on, and shall inure to the benefit of, the parties to it and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. 16. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable by any court of fmal jurisdiction, it is the intent of the parties that all other provisions of this Agreement be construed to remain fully valid, enforceable, and binding on the parties. 17. Entire Agreement: Modification: Waiver. This Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter hereof and thereof and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties, whether oral or written. No supplement, modification or amendment of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement or the Contract Documents shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. No waiver shall be binding unless executed in writing by the party making the waiver. 18. Notices. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given on the date of service if served personally on the party to whom notice is to be given, or on the third business day after mailing if'mailed to the party to whom notice is to be given, by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, or on the first business day after being deposited with an overnight carrier for delivery the next business day, and properly addressed as follows: To Vendor at: Inacom Information Systems 11777 Sorrento Valley Road San Diego California 92121 To City at: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attn: City Manager Any party may change its address for purposes of this paragraph by giving the other parties written notice of the new address in the manner set forth above. 19. Effects of Headings. The subject headings of the sections and subsections of this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not affect or be considered in the construction or interpretation of any of its provisions. 20. Governin~ Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of California as applied to contracts that are executed and performed entirely in California. r:h~emote\winframe.agr 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have duly executed it on the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Vendor Inacom Information Systems Kevin L. Lawler, Branch Manager r:kremote\winfxame. agr 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SCOPE OF WORK/PROPOSAL SHEETS PART I: EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS Compaq ProLiant 850R 6/200H - 200 Pentium Pro Processor - 128 MB EDO ECC DIMM RAM - 2 4.3 OB Hot plug Wide-Ultra SCSI-3 Hard Drives - Integrated 10/100 TX UTP Controller - SmartStart and CD-ROM Drive - Compaq Insight Manager Citrix WinFrame Enterprise 1.7 15 User 1 Digi International 8 Port Serial Adapter 5 Robotics External Sportster 56k Modems Installation and Configuration of Server and Software on-site - Configure Network Connectivity - Create WinStations - Integrate WinFrame Server into existing Network - Training of City Staff to Support WinFrame - Create User Profiles All systems must be fully compatible with the City's existing Novell 4.11 Ethernet Network systems. PART H: P~C~G I~M TOTAL PRICE Equipment per specifications (PART I) Delivery Sales Tax Other Costs (please identify) TOTALPRICE Vendor Name: Address: Contact: City/St/Zip: Phone: EXHIBIT "B" February 17, 1998 City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula, California 92589-9033 (909) 694-6456 FAX (909) 694-6498 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS The City of Temecula, hereinafter referred to as the City, is inviting proposals for a Compaq ProLiant 850R 6/200H Server with Citrix WinFrame Enterprise 1.7 Remote Access. The purpose of this Request For Proposal (RFP) is for the City to purchase from a qualified and authorized vendor the required equipment per specifications provided. Proposals must include all information as outlined in the RFP packet, and must be received in a sealed envelope with "Remote Access RFI~' printed on the outside. Proposals must be delivered to the following address no later than 4:00pro, Tuesday, March 10, 1998: Via U.S. Mail or Courier Service: Walk-in Delivery: City of Temecula Attn: City Clerk 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA. 92589-9033 City of Temecula Attn: City Clerk 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA. 92590 Any questions pertaining to this Request For Quote may be directed toTom Hafeli, in writing, at the addresses above, or at Fax number (909) 694-6498. c~ City Clerk City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive - PO Box 9033 - Temecula, California 92589-9033 (9O9) 694-6456 FAX (909) 694-6498 REQUF_ST FOR PROPOSAL COMPUTERS PART 1: SELECTION CRITERIA A final contract will be awarded to the proposal which best serves the needs of the City and provides the highest quality and cost effectiveness as determined by the City Council based on the following factors (which are listed without any implication of priority): The extent to which the proposal meets the needs of the City for the equipment/services and the specific requirements of this RFP; 2. The quality of the equipment/services proposed; The overall cost to the City of the proposal, including, but not limited to, pricing of the equipment/supplies, delivery schedule, terms of payment, warranties, maintenance requirements, and required site preparation; The experience and qualifications of Vendor to successfully provide the equipment in Exhibit A; 5. Previous performance of Vendor in providing similar equipment/services; 6. Financial ability of Vendor to provide the equipment/services to the City; and 7. Vendoffs conformity to the specification set forth in the RFP. PART H: INSTRUCTIONS, CONOmONS, ANO LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Vendor shall provide all of the following specific information to the City as part of the proposal, as well as all other infomarion and documents as may be required by or necessary to respond to other provisions of this RFP: ao List of equipment/services to be provided, including a breakdown of costs for_all equipment components. (See Exhibit "A"). bo Provide pricing on all requirements as outlined in Exhibit "A". If there are discrepancies between unit prices and extensions, the City reserves the right to clarify pricing with the affected vendors. Delivery schedules shall be part of the consideration. Time of delivery must be stated in definite terms, and must be met. If time varies on specific items proposed, the Vendor shall so state the specific schedule to those items in the proposal sheet (Exhibit "A"). Once a Vendor has been selected for award, the City reserves the right to renegotiate delivery terms based on changing situations or the convenience of the City. do Vendor shall provide an original and four (4) copies of proposals upon submission. eo This RFP outlines the requirements herein in as much detail as is currently known. Please provide any exceptions, additional information, or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process (attachments are acceptable). fe Information regarding the Vendor's experience and qualifications to successfully provide the equipment/services outlined in Exhibit "A". Certification establishing that the vendor is fully authorized by the manufacturer for the sale, distribution, installation, and/or support of the equipment required by this RFP. ho A listing of client references and an outline of any experience the firm/vendor has had in meeting the needs of other governmental organizations, or any organization that has purchased similar equipment, supplies or services. i. The Proposal shall include an itemized list for documentation and manuals. Vendor agrees that failure on its part to list all cost components related to the purchase (i.e., sales lax and freight charges) will not be accepted by the City as grounds to re-quote the proposal. The quote shall include all cost components related to the purchase. Vendor acknowledges that the original proposal and costs provided stand. However, Vendor has the option of withdrawing a proposal at any time until a final contract is executed. Vendor's proposal shall include the price for the most up to date, high quality, and state of the art equipment, as outlined in the Scope of Work within this RFP (Exhibit "A"). The City reserves the right to negotiate terms and scope of work with the highest ranked firm. If an agreement cannot be negotiated, the City reserves the right to negotiate with any other finalist. ~' 2 All of the equipment described in the Exhibit "A" must carry a three year parts and labor on-site warranty and technical support. Vendor shall also fully describe the terms of all equipment warranties received from the manufacturer. The City reserves the right to select a Vendor to perform all of the work identified in this RFP, or only selected portions based on price and/or other factors. o The Vendor shall be excused from performance hereunder during the time and to the extent that Vendor is prevented from obtaining, delivering, or performing in the customary manner, by acts of God, fire, war, strike, and loss or shortage of transportation facilities or similar conditions beyond the reasonable control of Vendor. Vendor shall notify the City within five (5) working days of any such condition that work will be delayed and shall provide the City with satisfactory evidence that non-performance is due to other than fault or negligence on Vendor's part. Any evidence of agreement or collusion among vendors acting to illegally restrain freedom of competition by agreement to propose a fixed price, or otherwise, will render the proposal of such vendors void. o Vendor shall be responsible for paying its employees and any sub-vendors the prime vendor hires. Vendor is required to comply with fill existing State and Federal labor laws. If Vendor hires a sub-vendor, it will be the prime Vendor's responsibility to ensure that all sub-vendors meet the requirements as stated in this RFP. 10. Vendor, and any sub-vendor who is hired by the prime vendor, agrees to maintain a City of Temecula Business License for the duration of the contract. 11. The standard form of the City's Equipment Purchase/Agreement for Consultant Services is attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Vendor selected will be required to enter into this Agreement. By submitting the Proposal, Vendor certifies to City that it has reviewed the agreement and has incorporated the cost of complying with the Agreement into its Proposal. PART IlI: GENERAL PROVISIONS Vendor is required to carefully and fully investigate all of the requirements of this RFP as well as the site where the work will take place and all work or arrangements needed to fulfill the terms of the Proposal. By submitting a Proposal, Vendor represents and certifies to the City that such investigation has been completed and that it fully understands the scope of work required. The Scope of Work/Proposal sheet (Exhibit "A") shall be signed by an authorized official of the company. 3 10. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals and to waive irregularities in the proposals. The City will not reimburse vendors for any costs involved in the preparation and submission of proposals. Furthermore, this RFP does not obligate the City to accept or contract for any expressed or implied services. The City reserves the right to request any organization submitting a proposal to clarify its proposal or to supply additional material deemed necessary to assist in the selection process. If an Exhibit "A" requirement cannot be met by a vendor, then the vendor should submit a "No Proposal" response for the items affected. Alternate or equivalent items submitted for no proposal responses may be considered by the City, unless otherwise specified. All submitted proposals and information included therein or attached thereto shall become public records upon their opening by the City Clerk's Office or City Staff. Vendor is requested to provide any exceptions, additional information or suggestions that will aid in the City's selection process. Vendor and any sub-vendor are also obligated to comply with all existing local, State and Federal Labor laws, rules, and regulations, including, without limitation, OSHA standards and requirements. Any questions regarding this Request For Proposal should be referred, in writing, to Mr. Thomas Hafeli. Questions may be transmitted by fax to (909) 694-6498, or may be delivered to City Hall at the address below: Via U.S. Mail: Courier Service/Walk-In Delivery: City of Temecula Atto: Thomas Hafeli P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 City of Temecula Attn: Thomas Hafeli 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 All questions and the City's answers will become public record and will be shared with all vendors who have requested a copy of this RFP. The attached Exhibit ~4 ' is a suggested list only. If vendor needs to revise or make additions to Exhibit 'A, ' computer or typed alterations are allowed as long as the City format is maintained. 4 EXHIBIT "C" CITY OF TEMECULA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SCOPE OF WORK/PROPOSAL SHEETS PART I: EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS Compaq ProLiant 850R 6/200H - 200 Pentim Pro Processor - 128 MB EDO ECC DIMM RAM - 2 4.3 GB Hot plug Wide-Ultra SCSI-3 Hard Drives - Integrated 10/100 TX UTP Controller - SmartStart and CD-ROM Drive - Compaq irasight Manager Cittix WinFrame Enterprise 1.7 15 User 1 Digi International 8 Port Serial Adapter 5 Robotics Ex-temal Sportster 56k Modems Installation and Configuration of Server and Software on-site - Configure Netsyork Connectivity - Create WinStations - Integrate WinFrame Server into e,,cistmg Nem'ork - Training of City Staff to Support WinFrame - Create User Profiles All systems must be fully compatible with the Ciw's existing Novell 4.11 Ethernet Network systems. PART H: PRICING ITEM TOTAL PRICE Equipment per specifications (PAR. T I) Delivery Sales Tax Other Costs (please identify) ~-~ o~ '~'~.(~¢~. k~c;~¢ TOTAL PRICE ITEM 6 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA .I~C.~/~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager{~?~/ March 31, 1998 Sister City Association Student Trip to Voorburg PREPARED BY: Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst¢;~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an expenditure of funds in the amount of $1,900 to provide the 19 students traveling to Voorburg, Netherlands a check in the amount of $100 for each student. BACKGROUND: The Sister City Association (SCA) coordinates visits between Temecula citizens and citizens of Temecula's sister cities. To date, Temecula's sister cities are Voorburg, Netherlands and Nakayama, Japan. The Temecula Valley Unified School District middle schools which have "adopted" these cities are Vail Ranch Middle School and Margarita Middle School, respectively. Each year, the SCA schedules and plans a trip for students to visit their sister city. Traditionally, the City Council has provided a check for $100 to each student traveling abroad. The next planned trip is for 4 adults and 19 students from Vail Ranch Middle School to travel to Voorburg, Netherlands on May 16th. The $100 check is requested by the SCA for the students only. If the Council approves this expenditure, the individual checks will be presented to the students at the April 28th meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $1,900 are available in the Sister Cities Account, 001 - 101-999-5280. ITEM 7 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO,,~.,~_L.. CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony J. ElTo, Chief Building Official March 31, 1998 Contract Plan Checking Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement for plan check services with J. A. S. Pacific Services for the Building and Safety Department. DISCUSSION: The Building and Safety Department has experienced an increase in the volume of plan checks. With the addition of the mall project it will burden our current plan checking services. J.A.S. Pacific Services is willing to provide additional services for the City of Temecula, on an as needed basis. FISCAL IMPACT: Services line item. Adequate funds are available in the Building and Safety Consulting CITY OF TEMECULA AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of March 31, 1998, between the City of Temeeula, a municipal corporation ("City") and J.A.S. Pacific, Inc., ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on March 31, 1998, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 1999, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PE~RFORMANCF~. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talere, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly for actual services performed. Payment shah be made within lhirty (30) days of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its perfornmn~ of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such addifioml services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the ~ts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such stun exceed ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall he approved by the City Council. e. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the City di~ates any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. R:\BR~OMTSLIAS.PLC 3/16/98 cb -I- 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGRF, EMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided Chat the work performed is of value to lhe City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 6. DEFAUI,T OF CONSULTANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice oflhe default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DO~NTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as nece.s.sary, and shah allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreemere, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer fries, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. e. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. R:\BROCK_-M~I~OMTSLIAS.PLC 3/16~98 ¢b -2- 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless fi~e City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City. 9. 1NSURANCI*. REQUIRgMle~NTS. Consultam shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Intorance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. Errors and omissions liability insurance appropriate to the eonsultant's profession. b. Minimum I Jmitq of In,rance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. (4) Errors and omissions liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence. c. Deductibles and Self-Inmwed Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared ~o and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. O~h~,r I~xqa~rancg Provi.qlortq. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or R:\BROCKMEI~AOMTS~JAS.PLC 3/16/98 eb -3- automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunleers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunivers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Aeceptabilillt of Irtqurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements eftcoting coverage required by fids clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, lhe Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements eftcoting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under fids Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent lhat it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of fids Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay ~laries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAl, RF3IPONSIR1LITIEq. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to fids Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity oecasionexl by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. R:kBROCKMEIkAOMTSLIAS.PLC 3/16/98 ¢b 12. RELEA~qE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreemere shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, inlerrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, tahat provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula Mailing Address: P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: City Manager To Consultant: JAS Pacific, Inc. 320 S. Milliken Ste C Ontario, CA 91761 Attention: J. Addison Smith R:~BROCKMEIg[OMTSLIAS.PLC 3/16/98 cb -5- 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shah not assign the perfommnce of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Contractor shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Contractor may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of said assistants from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the city shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. I.ICENSF~q. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING I.AW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall lake place in lhe municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Agreement, the prevailing party as determined by lhe Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute Ibis Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has Ibe authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have eauseA this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Attest: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk R:~BROCKMEI~OMTS~JAS.PLC 3/16/98 cb -6- Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT JAS Pacific, Inc. R:\BROCKME~GMT$~AS.PLC 3/16/98 ¢b -7- F. XHIRIT A TASKS TO BF. PF. RFORMF. D JAS proposes to provide the following the following building plan check services: To provide initial plan check of submitted plans to determine compliance with City adopted model codes: Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, National Electrical Code, Uniform Fire Code, California State Building Code, Title 24 (Energy Conservation and Handicapped Access Regulations), Sound Transmission Control, and locally adopted amendments thereof. To analyze structural engineering computations ensuring compliance with the jurisdiction's adopted model codes and regulations. 3. To maintain a timely turnaround for all building plan check projects as follows: Three to five (3-5) working days for single family residential projects. Seven to ten (7-10) working days for more complex non-residential projects. Ten (10) working days for more complex non-residential projects. Three (3) working days for resubmitted residential projects. Five (5) working days for resubmitted non-residential projects. Other requested timetables available to fit individual circumstances. Priority plan check availability to individual applicants on specified projects requiring a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround time shall be within five (5) working days from date of receipt by JAS Pacific, Inc. The plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in-house courier service at no cost to the jurisdiction. To provide fast track plan check availability to the City on City funded projects requiring a more expeditious turnaround time than previously specified. Turnaround time shall be within (5) working days from the date of receipt by JAS Pacific Services. The plans shall be picked up and delivered by our in house courier service at no cost to the jurisdiction. To coordinate the review of plans with Fire, Sanitation, Health and other agencies when applicable. 7. To systematically log all plans with a plan check tracking system. o To provide within 24 hours notice, pick up or delivery of plans utilizing our courier service at no charge to the jurisdiction. o Plans examiners and engineers shall be readily available to the applicant and maintain an open line of communication to ensure compliance with local regulations and policy interpretations. 10. To provide the applicant and the city, a typed correction list to achieve compliance of adopted codes and regulations. R:\BR~OMTSklAS.PLC 3/16/98 cb -8- EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCI-IIRI)UI.1R. Residential and Commercial Plan Review A fee of fifty two percent (52%) of Building Permit Fees based upon the 1991 Uniform Building Code Table 3-A Calculations. No other fee shall be charged for re-submittal of plans that required corrections or minor revisions, prior to permit issuance. An additional fee shall be charged for major structural revisions or change orders made after permit issuance. As a result, JAS shall notify the City in writing of the necessity to charge an additional fee to offset cost of additional plan review service. Repetitive Plans. With the exception of each residential tract elevation or orientation, a fee equal to fifteen (15 %) of the regular City plan review fee shall be charged for each repetitive plan. Each different plan and each different elevation shall be charged a normal fee equal to fifteen (15 %) percent of the regular City plan review fee. R:~BROCKMEIL~O!dTS~IA$.PLC 3/16198 ¢b -9- ITEM 8 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY DIR, OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 31, 1998 Release Bond for Traffic Signalization Mitigation Fees in Parcel Map No. 19580-1 and accept Substitute Bond for Parcel 3 (W/o Diaz Road and N/o Rancho California Road) PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Albert K. Crisp, Permit Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council AUTHORIZE release of bond for Traffic Signal Mitigation Fees in Parcel Map No. 19580-1, ACCEPT a Traffic Signal Mitigation bond and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreement for the remaining parcel as submitted by the owner, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so notify the developers and sureties. BACKGROUND: The County of Riverside approved Parcel Map No. 19580-1 on October 30, 1986, and entered into agreements with the developer, Kaiser Development, including a deferment agreement for payment of traffic signal mitigation fees. A bond was posted by Insurance Company of North America as follows: Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond No. KO 21 00 14 9 $207,882.50 Where securities are posted in accordance with the agreements, these securities are generally held in full until all of the parcel owner/developers have paid the pertinent traffic signalization mitigation fees. This may require several years to accomplish in industrial park developments where a number of builders may develop on one of many parcels in the overall development. In the subject instance, the County of Riverside authorized a partial reduction of $107,882.50 on October 6, 1988, leaving $100,000 to cover the remaining undeveloped parcels. The developer, Kaiser Development Company (successors were KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, L.L.C., now ZKS) sought further reduction to cover just the three remaining undeveloped parcels (Parcels 3, 6, and 13). Buyers of Parcels 6 and 13 had not paid the requisite fees or submitted substitute agreements and securities at the time of the last reduction. The City Attorney directed Staff to retain sufficient coverage by the developer until the fees for the parcels no longer owned by the underlying developer had either been paid or posted securities with the City. R:\AGDRPT\98\033 I\PM 195801 .TSM On June 25, 1996, the City Council accepted a new security and agreement from KI/FKLA Rancho Realty, L.L.C., said security was posted by The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as follows: Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond No. 100869980-96-057 $31,191.06 In the interim, the owners of both Parcels 6 and 13 have paid their respective traffic signalization mitigation fees. The developer has now sold the remaining Parcel 3 to: Harry and Linda Clark 28765 Single Oak Drive, //200 Temecula, CA 92590 for which said buyer has submitted a substitute Traffic Signal Mitigation Bond and Traffic Signalization Mitigation Agreement. The bond was posted by Frontier Pacific Insurance Company as follows: Bond No. SD00015981 for traffic signal mitigation in the amount of $5,140.50 Staff recommends that the City Council authorize release of the bond on file for Parcel Map No 19580-1 (Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Bond No. 100869980-96-057 in the amount of $131,191.06) and to accept in substitution both the agreement and bond as submitted by the Clarks for Parcel No. 3 in Parcel Map No. 19580-1. All other contractual obligations for public improvements have been completed and the warranty, labor and materials, and subdivision monument bonds for this development have been released by Riverside County action prior to incorporation. All streets within the Parcel Map boundary are in the City Maintained-Streets System by succession to County of Riverside. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Substitute Agreement (On file) 3. Substitute Bond (On file) R:\AGDRPT~98\033 I\PM195801 .TSM O,S t. ~0' PARCEL MAP NO. 19580-1 Location Map NOTE: MAPS NOT TO SCALE ITEM 9 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER City Council/City Manager .-tJoseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 31, 1998 Reimbursement Agreement Development Corporation City of Temecula and The Pechanga PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Development Corporation in the amount of $77,220.00 for the Pala Road Widening Project between Via Eduardo and Pechanga Road, and authorize the Mayor to execute this Agreement. BACKGROUND: In the Capital Improvement Budget the City Council has set aside $150,000 for the widening of Pala Road between Via Eduardo and Pechanga Road. The work was to be done as a cooperative effort between the City and the Pechanga Entertainment Development Corporation to improve the safety of the public using that roadway. The City had requested that the Pechanga Tribe dedicate their half of the roadway to the City as a condition of using City funds for improving the Pechanga Tribe portion of the road. The Pechanga Tribe elected not to dedicate their half to the public and to pay for all of the improvements for their portion of the roadway. They have requested that the City pay only for the improvements made to the City half of the road. City staff has reviewed and approved the improvement plans for Pala Road and has provided project inspection for the work performed in conjunction with these plans. The Pechanga Entertainment Development Corporation paid plan check and inspection fees to the City for reviewing and inspecting these voluntary improvements. We have verified the quantities and construction costs associated with the improvements within City right-of-way and feel comfortable in recommending an expenditure of $77,220 through this Reimbursement Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: This Capital Improvement Project is funded by Measure "A" Funds. Adequate funds are available in the FY1997-98 Capital Improvement Budget Account No. 210-165-668-5804. Attachments: Agreement r:\agdrpt\98\0331 \pechanga.agr/ajp REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT PALA ROAD WIDENING PROJECT BETWEEN VIA EDUARDO & PECHANGA ROAD BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of March 31, 1998, between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and THE PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER". In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: Section I. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT. The purpose ofthis Agreement is to establish the reimbursement to DEVELOPER by CITY for the cost of improving certain street and drainage improvements made necessary by the widening of Pala Road between Via Eduardo and Pechanga Road, hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT". The construction of all the improvements to Pala Road will need to be constructed simultaneously in order to meet the requirements of the Developer and the City and undertaking the construction of the Improvements in one coordinated effort as described in this Agreement will alleviate conflicts between different contractors working in the same area, duplication of efforts by contractors, and substantial const savings for both City and Developer and, therefore, it is uneconomical and impractical for the City to bid the work separately from the Developer. Section II. REIMRUR~EMENT. CITY shall reimburse DEVELOPER for the City's portion of the cost, up to a maximum of $77,220.00 (hereinafter referred to as "REIMBURSEMENT"), for the reconstruction and widening of the northeasterly side of Pala Road between Via Eduardo and Pechanga Road within the PROJECT area and within City of Temecula. The costs for the REIMBURSEMENT to DEVELOPER by CITY shall include the following items as shown within the attached Bid Result Spreadsheet: A. Work Items Extended Bid Amounts Asphalt Removal & Disposal Over excavate & Reeompact Roadway Export Excess Materials Finegrade and Compact Subgrade Place & Compact 5.5"AC/11.3" Class II Base Clean, Tack, & Overlay 2.5" AC Estimated Total $ 7 550.00 6 334.00 7 525.00 2 710.00 35 818.00 17 284.00 $ 77, 220.00 Costs are based on construction bids received for the PROJECT by DEVELOPER and shown within the attached Bid Restfit Spreadsheet. CITY shall have the opportunity to evaluate and analyze bids received and approved DEVELOPER's selection of CONTRACTOR prior to the commencement of the work on the PROJECT. I R: Xagmt~ ~pe.~anga .agr/aj p SECTION Ill. PAYMENT TO DEVEI,OPER. DEVELOPER shall make payment to CONTRACTOR for work performed and shall be responsible for all agreements with CONTRACTOR. Actual costs shall be identified and billed to CITY for payment on the following basis: A. Monthly billings shall be submitted to CITY showing the actual quantities of work completed times the unit price for the items of work. Ninety percent (90%) of the REIMBURSEMENT shall be due and payable to DEVELOPER thirty (30) days after CITY receives the invoice and verifies the completed quantifies. B. The remaining ten percent (10%) REIMBURSEMENT to DEVELOPER by CITY shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days after the entire PROJECT is accepted as complete by CITY. SECTION IV. APPROVAl,S; PROJECT MANAGERS. It is acknowledged that CITY has reviewed and approved all DEVELOPER plans and specifications for the PROJECT improvements and has approved the bid amount as reasonable. Management and administration of the terms expressed herein shall be performed by DEVELOPER for the PROJECT. CITY agrees to designate Mr. Ronald J. Parks as the contact for CITY in regards to this agreement. DEVELOPER agrees to designate Mr. Dennis Chinieaff as a point of contact for DEVELOPER to facilitate the reimbursements identified herein. SECTION V. INSPECTION. CITY shall provide for inspection of all REIMBURSEMENT Improvements within the PROJECT at its sole cost and expense. DEVELOPER shall pay the required inspection fees for all other portions of the Improvements and CITY will provide inspection for improvements to Pala Road as shown on the Volunteer Improvement Plans for Pala Road prepared by DEVELOPER's engineer as approved by the City. SECTION VI. INDEMNIFICATION/INSURANCE. A. The DEVELOPER agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of DEVELOPER's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence or wrongful acts or omissions of the City. B. DEVELOPER shall require the contractor constructing the Improvements to procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) with a company and in a form approved by the Director of Public Works. SECTION VII. LEGAL .RESPONSIBILITIES. The DEVELOPER shall keep itself informed of State, Federal and local laws, ordinances and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it, those contracting with it, or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The DEVELOPER shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the DEVELOPER to comply with this section. 2 R: ~agmls'~l~.~hanga.agr/ajp SECTION VII. NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall be sent as follows: DEVELOPER: THE PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 45000 Pala Road Temecula, CA 92592 Atto: Dennis Chinieaff, Project Manager CITY: City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Ronald J. Parks, Principal Engineer Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party. All notices given at the most recent address specified shall be deemed to have been properly given. This Agreement is dated and executed by the parties as of the date set forth above. THE PECHANGA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a California corporation By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: CITY OF TEMECULA Ron Roberts, Mayor 3 R: Xa gmts [peehanga .agr/aj p ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 4 R: ~agmts \gechanga. aga'/aj p ITEM 10 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER City Council/City Manager Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 31, 1998 "All-Way Stop"- Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road PREPARED BY: ~Ali Moghadam P.E., Senior Engineer - Traffic/CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN "ALL-WAY STOP" AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PIO PICO ROAD BACKGROUND: The City received a request for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road to assist the Sparkman Elementary School students in crossing Margarita Road. Staff conducted a comprehensive study of this intersection and presented a report (Exhibit "A") to the Pubic/Traffic Safety Commission at the March 12, 1998 meeting. Also, during the meeting a petition consisting of 298 signatures requesting a traffic signal was presented to the Commission. However, several residents in attendance expressed their support for the installation of an "All-Way Stop" instead of a traffic signal. Based on the warrant analysis, existing conditions and the public input, the Commission recommended that an "All-Way Stop" rather than a traffic signal be installed at this intersection and a signal be considered in the future as the area develops. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Public Works Department Signs Account No. 001-164-601-5244 and Striping/Stenciling Account No. 001-164-601-5410. Attachments: 1. Resolution No. 98- 2. Exhibit "A" - Public/Traffic Safety Commission Agenda Report and Warrant Analysis r:~agdrpt\98~0331 ~MARGPIOP.STP/ajp RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING AN UALL-WAY STOP" AT THE INTERSECTION OF MARGARITA ROAD AND PIO PICO ROAD The City Council of the City of Temecula does resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. The City Council has considered the facts justifying the need for the stop signs proposed for the location described in this resolution. The Council hereby finds and determines that installation of the stop signs pursuant to this resolution will enhance the public health safety and general welfare at this location and the proposed stop signs will not create any adverse conditions in the area. Section 2. Pursuant to Section 10.12.100, of the Temecula Municipal Code, the following "STOP" location is hereby established in the City of Temecula. Margarita Road at Pio Pico Road Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 31st day of March, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk r :Lagdrpt\9~0331 ~IARG PIOP.STP/ajp [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 31st day of March, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: C OUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC, Acting City Clerk t:kagdrpt\98~0331 kM ARGP1OP.STP/ajp EXHIBIT "A" AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Ali Moghadam, P.E., Associate Engineer March 12, 1998 Item 5 Request for Installation of Traffic Signal - Intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road RECOMMENDATION: That the Pubhc/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road be placed on the City's Signal Priority List and consider installation of an "All-Way Stop" at this location as an interim traffic control device. BACKGROUND: At the January 15, 1998 regular meeting of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, the Commission received a letter and a verbal request to consider installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road and directed staff to place this item on the next meeting agenda. Margarita Road is designated as a four-lane arterial roadway on the General Plan Circulation Element. Currently, Margarita Road in this vicinity is a three (3) lane roadway with left-turn pockets at Pio Pico Road. Margarita Road is improved to the ultimate width including curb, gutter and sidewalk on the east side only. This intersection is controlled by "Stop" signs on Pio Pico Road and the traffic on Margarita Road is not required to stop. There are school crosswalks on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road, and on Pio Pico Road east of Mar~rita Road in front of Sparkman Elementary School. A horizontal curve exists on Margarita Road south of Pio Pico Road; however, the sight distance is adequate. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Margarita Road and 30 MPH on Pio Pico Road west of Margarita Road. Also, "SCHOOL - SPEED LIMIT 25 MPH - WHEN CHILDREN ARE PRESENT" signs have been installed on Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road in both directions near the school. Staff has conducted a comprehensive study of this intersection including vehicular and pedestrian volume counts, speed data analysis, sight distance measurements, traffic collision data analysis and warrant analysis for traffic signals, "Stop" signs and flashing yellow school signals (Exhibit "B"). The intersection of Margarita Road and Pio Pico Road meets one (1) of the eleven (11) warrants (peak hour volume) for installation of a traffic signal, therefore, this intersection will be included in the City's Signal Priority List for future consideration. There has been one (1) reported accident within the last twelve (12) month period at this intersection. However, the minimum volume portion of the warrants for installation of an "All-Way Stop" is met. Therefore, an "All-Way Stop" at this intersection could be considered as an interim traffic control device. In addition, the design for installation of yellow flashing beacons at schools has been completed and the lights should be in place by July, 1998. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: 1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map 2. Exhibit "B" - Letter of Request 3. Exhibit "C" - Warrant Analysis and Supporting Data / / EXHIBIT "A" LOCATION MAP Sparkman Elementary / School 19 ITEM 11 TO: fROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER ~,~.._~ CITY MANAGER .~r_~, CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director March 31, 1998 Old Town Streetscape Improvement Project Prepared By: John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR OLD TOWN TEMECULA AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS BACKGROUND: The Old Town Specific Plan adopted by the City Council includes a program for physical improvement of.the district. The Old Town Streetscape project includes new curb, gutter and boardwalk/sidewalk, street lights, streets signs, street furniture, landscaping, a sound system, gateway entry treatments and drainage improvements. Albert Webb and Associates were hired to develop the construction drawings, plans and specifications. Contract documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The estimated construction cost for the project is $2,800,000. FISCAL IMPACT: In accordance with the March 17, 1998 cooperative agreement with the Redevelopment Agency, the Redevelopmenmt Agency will reimburse the City for administrative, design and construction of the project. R:\OLDTOWN~STREET\STRTSCPE.CC 3/24/98 kgs 1 The 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program (Account 280-199-824-5800) includes ~2,740,000 for the administration, design and construction of the streetscape project. If necessary, we will request an additional appropriation for the balance of the contract when bids are received. Attachment: Resolution 98- R:\OLDTOWI~STREET\STRTSCPE.CC 3/24/98 kgs 2 RF~OLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS FOR OLD TOWN TEMECULA AND AUTHORIZING THE SOLICITATION OF CONSTRUCTION BIDS FOR THE IMPROVEME~S THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and a. The City proposes to construct with the assistance and cooperation of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula certain public improvements in the Old Town Area of the Redevelopment Project Area consisting of sidewalks, boardwalks, rolled curbs, streetlights, street furniture, landscaping, archways, storm drains, and related streetscape improvements as specified in the bid documents for PW No. 97-05 RDA on file in the Office of the Director of Public Works ("Improvements"). b. On March 17, 1998, the City and the Agency entered into a Cooperative Agreement by which the Agency would reimburse the City for the costs of the Improvements and made certain findings in connection therewith as required by law and the Redevelopment Plan. c. The Improvements are being undertaken pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan for which a full and complete Environmental Impact Report was prepared and certified prior to adoption of the Plan. Additionally the Improvements were proposed as a part of the Old Town Specific Plan for which an environment review was completed and certified in 1994. The approval of the Plans and Specifications for the Improvements is, therefore, exempt from CEQA pursuant to Sections 15180, 15282(0, 15301, and 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Administrative Code) and Public Resources Code Section 21090. None of the findings set forth in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, Chapter 3 of the California Administrative Code) requiring a subsequent or supplement environmental impact report can be made and, therefore, further environment review is not required pursuant to the authority of Section 15180 of the CEQA Guidelines and other applicable law. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Plans and Specifications for the Old Town Streetscape Improvements (PW No. 97-05 RDA) and authorizes the Director of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Improvements. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 31st day of March, 1998. ATTEST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan W Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 98- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 31st day of March, 1998, by the following vote: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk Repo.\98- 2 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MARCH 14, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 12:40 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, Roberts, and Stone. ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 10, 1998 MOTION: Director Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. was seconded by Director Roberts and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None. The motion GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None. Minutes. CSD\031498 1 BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS None. ADJOURNMENT At 12:40 P.M., President Stone formally adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, March 17, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk/District Secretary Minutes. CSD\031498 2 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MARCH 17, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:47 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. President Jeffrey E. Stone presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Ford, Lindemans, and Stone. ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Roberts. Also present were General Manager Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 24, 1998. 2. Engineering Design Services Contract - Santa Gertrudis Trail Under Crossing 2.1 Award a contract in the amount of $49,735 to Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates for the preparation of schematic design drawings, construction documents, and project administration for the Santa Gertrudis Trail Under Crossing project. 3. Tract No. 21818 - Establishing Service Level B Rates and Charges 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR LOT NOS. 1-14 AND 18-29 WITHIN TRACT NO. 21818 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH minutes.CSD\031798 1 Temecula Community Services District 4. 031798 Tract No. 25892 - Establishing Service Level B Rates and Charges 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH RESPECT TO ESTABLISHING SERVICE LEVEL B RATES AND CHARGES FOR TRACT NO. 25892 BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 5. Funding for the Cultural Arts Master Plan 5.1 Approve the Consultant Services Agreement with AMS Planning and Research, Inc., for the development of a Cultural Arts Master Plan in an amount not to exceed $55,000; 5.2 Appropriate $55,000.00 from TCSD fund balance to the City Council Consulting Services account to provide funds for the development of the Cultural Arts Master Plan and a 10% contingency. MOTION: Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Comerchero, moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 through 5. Voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Director Roberts who was absent. DISTRICT BUSINESS 6. Approval of 1997-98 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 98-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS Director of Finance Roberts presented the staff report (as per agenda material). MOTION: Director Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-04. Director Comerchero seconded the motion and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Director Roberts who was absent. minutes.CSD\031798 2 Temecula Community Services District 031798 DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT None. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT None. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS None. ADJOURNMENT At 8:52 P.M., President Stone formally adjourned the meeting to Tuesday, March 31, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeffrey E. Stone, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk/District Secretary minutes.CSD\031798 3 TCSD DEPARTMENTAL REPORT APPROVAl, CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOF OF FINANC~y,~,Z"' CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: Board of Directors Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services March 31, 1998 SUBJECT: Departmental Report PREPARED BY: ~ Gail L. Zigler, Administrative Secretary On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Edge Construction for $1.35 million, for the construction of Margarita Community Park. Staff is currently in the process of gathering the appropriate signatures on the documentation. A preconstruction meeting was held on March 11, 1998, and construction is scheduled to begin on March 23, 1998, The Master Plan includes parking, lighting, tot lots, picnic facilities, landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian walkways, a roller hockey rink, tennis courts, and ballfield lighting. It is anticipated this project will be completed in the Spring, 1999. The City Council awarded a contract on October 7, 1997, to ModCraft for the ADA upgrades project and this project is currently under construction. This project provides handicap accessibility to the following park sites: John McGee Park, Calle Aragon Park, Bahia Vista Park, Rancho California Sports Park and Veteran's Park. Rancho California Sports Park will be completed first and the other three parks will follow. It is anticipated this project will be complete by June 1998. On February 10, 1998, the City Council awarded a contract to Terra Cal Construction for $601,000, for the construction of Winchester Creek Park. A preconstruction meeting was held on March 16, 1998, and construction is scheduled to begin on April 7, 1998. Winchester Creek Park is a 4.5 acre passive use park consisting of a tot lot, picnic facilities, an outdoor basketball court, a sand volleyball court and open turf areas. On March 17, 1998, the Board of Directors approved a Professional Services Agreement and Scope of Services, in the amount of $55,000, with AMS Planning and Research, for the preparation of a ten (10) year Cultural Arts Master Plan for the City of Temecula. It is anticipated the first meeting with the consultant will be scheduled within the next 30 days. A Request for Qualifications was released for the design of a City library. RFQ's were received on November 25, 1997, and after review staff selected six firms to participate in the interview process. Library architect interviews were held on February 9, 1998, with follow-up interviews held on February 26, 1998. Staff is currently negotiating a Scope of Services and Compensation with the top ranked firm. A recommendation will be going forward to the City Council in April 1998. R:~A~GENDAS~dpt9803 Msrch 18, 1998 City Council awarded a contract to Dahl, Taylor & Associates for the design of a temperature control system at the Community Recreation Center gymnasium. This project is currently out to bid. Bid opening is scheduled for March 26, 1998, and staff anticipates construction will being in early June 1998, with this project completed by mid August 1998. At the request of the several homeowners who live in the area of Butterfield Stage Park, staff is currently in the processing of designing a half court basketball court at Butterfield Stage Park. It is anticipated first plan check will be submitted on March 25, 1998, and the project will go out to bid in June, 1998. The Sports Park Sidewalk Project is currently in third plan check. Modifications were made to the landscaping and irrigation plans. Staff anticipates this project will be out to bid in April 1998. R:~A~AGt~NDA$~dp~9805 Msrch 18, 1998 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 14, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 12:41 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Lindemans presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, Roberts, Stone, and Lindemans. ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. AGENCY BUSINESS 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 10, 1998. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 1. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None given. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS Agency Member Lindemans asked for an explanation of Redevelopment Agency Funds. Director of Finance Genie Reports gave an explanation of the individual Redevelopment Agency Funds and reported that all have been allocated toward specific projects. 1 ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Agency Member Stone, seconded by Agency Member Roberts to adjourn at 1:01 PM to a meeting on March 17, 1998, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel Lindemans, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk/District Secretary MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 17, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 8:52 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Lindemans presiding. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 3 ABSENT: 1 ABSTAIN: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Ford, and Lindemans. AGENCY MEMBER: Roberts. AGENCY MEMBER: Stone. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 24, 1998. Approval of Cooperative Agreement with the City of Temecula/Redevelopment Agency for Construction and Funding of Sixth Street Parking, First Street Bridge, Old Town Streetscape and Sam Hicks Park 2.1 Approve an Agreement entitled "Cooperative Agreement" between the City of Temecula and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula for construction and funding of Sixth Street Parking, First Street Bridge, Old Town Streetscape and Sam Hicks Park; 2.2 Authorize the Chairperson to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form attached to the Agenda Report; minutes. RDA\031798 1 Temecula Redevelopment A~encv 031798 2.3 Authorize the budgeted expenditures of $8,160,180 by the Redevelopment Agency for the Agency's share of costs to date of the Sixth Street Parking, First Street Bridge, Old Town Streetscape and Sam Hicks Park, as well as authorize the expenditure for future project costs incurred as approved by the City or Agency. MOTION: Agency Member Ford moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 and 2. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Roberts who was absent and Agency Member Stone who abstained. JOINT CITY COUNCIL/REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING RDA Bonds for a Multifamily Residential Rental Housing Development/Temecula Gardens, L.P. 3.1 That the Redevelopment Agency and City Council conduct a joint public hearing; 3.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY TEMECULA GARDENS, L.P. Redevelopment Director McLarney presented the staff report (of record), clarifying that the approval of Resolution No. 98-22 would not commit the Council/Agency to financing and that financing documents would be submitted for review and approval at a later date. There being no public input, the public hearing was closed. MOTION: Councilman Lindemans moved to adopt Resolution No. 98-22. The motion was seconded by Councilman Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Mayor Roberts who was absent and Councilman Stone who abstained. minutes. RDA\031798 2 Temecula Redevelopment AQenGv AGENCY BUSINESS 4. 031798 Review and Approval of 1997-98 Mid-Year Budgets 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. RDA 98-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS Director of Finance Roberts reviewed the staff report (of record), noting that no changes are being proposed to the authorized positions with regard to this fund. MOTION: Agency Member Ford moved to adopt Resolution No. RDA 98-06. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Comerchero and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Roberts who was absent and Agency Member Stone who abstained. REDEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S REPORT None. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT None. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS None. minutes. RDA\031798 3 Temecula Redevelopment Aaencv 031798 ADJOURNMENT At 8:57 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 31, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Karel F. Lindemarts, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk/District Secretary minutes. RDA\031798 4 ITEM 2 .APPROt~r CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA~I/~ ~',,,)1(<.... CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Board Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director '~~ March 31, 1998 Awarding a Contract to Steve Krabbe to Paint the Second Phase of the Mural at the Old Town Transportation Center Prepared By: Saied Naaseh, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: 1) That the Agency Members Award the Contract for $21,250 to Steve Krabbe to Paint the Second Phase of the Mural at the Old Town Transportation Center. 2) Authorize Executive Director and Agency Counsel to Execute the contract. BACKGROUND: On January 27, 1998, the City Council approved funding for the second phase of the mural on the Circle K wall adjacent to the 6th Street Parking Lot. Awarding this contract would permit the painting of this mural which will be done by the same artist who completed the first phase of the mural. FISCAL IMPACT The funds in the Facade Improvement Program will be used to fund this contract. Currently there is approximately a $45,000.00 balance in this Program (Account No. 280-199-813-5804). Attachments: 1. Agreement for Consultant Services, Painting of the Second Phase of the Mural at the Old Town Transportation Center.- Page 2 R:\OLDTOWI~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24198 kgs I ATTACHMENT NO. I AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES, PAINTING OF THE SECOND PHASE OF THE MURAL AT THE OLD TOWN TRANSPORTATION CENTER R:\OLDTOWN~FACADE\MUP. ALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 2 AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, is made and effective as of April 1, 1998, between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, a public body, corporate and politic ("Agency") and Steve A. Krabbe, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on April 1, 1998 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than April 1, 1999, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SF. RVICF. q. Consultant shall perform the tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT. a. The Agency agrees to pay twenty one thousand two hundred and fifty dollars ($21,250.00) to the Consultant upon completion of the project in accordance with the terms of this agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the Executive Director. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by Executive Director and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. The Executive Director may approve additional work not to exceed Two Thousand One Hundred and Twenty Five Dollars ($2,125.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. c. Consultant will submit an invoice upon completion of the project for actual services performed. Payment shall he made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all nondisputed fees. If the Agency disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. R:\OLDTOWNXFACADE~MURALCON.CC 3/25/98 kgs 3 SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The Agency may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the Agency suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the Agency shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the Agency. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the Agency pursuant to Section 3. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSUI.TANT. a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the Executive Director or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the Agency shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its .designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts therefrom as R:\OLDTOWI~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 4 necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the Agency and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the Agency without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files, Consultant shall make available to the Agency, upon reasonable written request by the Agency, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. c. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Consultant. 8. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the Agency. 9. INSURANCE RFQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (FA. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. R:\OLDTOWI~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs ~ b. Minimum l.imits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Executive Director. At the option of the Executive Director, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insures as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the Agency, its officers, officials, employees or R:\OLDTOWi~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 6 volunteers. (4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the Agency. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the Agency. f. Verification of Coveralge. Consultant shall furnish the Agency with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the Agency. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the Agency before work commences. As an alternative to the Agency's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the Agency a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the Agency. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. I.EGAI. RFSPONSIBIL1TIF.~;. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The Agency, and its officers R:\OLDTOWN~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24]98 kgs 7 and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. REI,EASE OF INFORMATION. a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the Executive Director or unless requested by the Agency Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the Agency. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed thereunder or with respect to any project or property located within **the Agency. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICF& Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: Executive Director To Consultant: 24787 Split Rail Road Wildomar, CA 92590 Attention: Steve A. Krabbe (909) 244-1917 14. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent R:\OLDTOWN~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 8 of the Agency. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement, only Robin Golden shall perform the services described in this Agreement. Robin Golden may use assistants, under their direct supervision, to perform some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice prior to the departure of Robin Golden from Consultant's employ. Should he or she leave Consultant's employ, the Agency shall have the option to immediately terminate this Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be othenvise agreed to in writing between the Agency and the Consultant. 15. I.ICENSE.g. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. Contractor represents to Agency that is holds a valid Class C-33 Contractor's License in the State of California. 16. GOVERNING LAW. The Agency and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over **the Agency of Temecula. 17. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 18. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREF, MENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. R:\OLDTOWN~FACADEkMURALCON.CC 3/25/98 kgs 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have mused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By Ronald E. Bradley Executive Director Attest: Susan W. Jones Acting City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson Agency Counsel CONSULTANT Steve A. Krabbe 24787 Split Rail Road Wildomar, CA 92590 By R:\OLDTOWN~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 10 EXHIRIT A TASKS TO RE PERFORMED Paint the second phase of the mural on the southerly wall of the Circle K building located at the Old Town Transportation Center according to the approved plans filed with the City of Temecula. R:\OLDTOWI~FACADE\MURALCON.CC 3/24/98 kgs 1 1 RDA DEPARTMENTAL REPORT CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE DIRECTO~~ CITY MANAGER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Executive Director/Redevelopment Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director March 31, 1998 Monthly Departmental Report Attached for your information is the monthly report as of March Redevelopment Department. This report covers housing, redevelopment and economic development. 31, 1998 for the TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM Executive Director/Agency Members Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director March 31, 1998 Monthly Redevelopment Activity Report Prepared by: John Meyer, Housing and Redevelopment Manager HOUSING First Time Homebuyers Program · Eighteen families have been funded for FY 97-98. Residential Iml~rovement Programs Since the program started, twenty one projects have been completed and 10 are in process. The majority of these projects are roof repairs, repainting and fence replacement. Temecula O.N.E. Crime Free Multi-Housing Program certificates have been awarded to Rancho West, Vintage View, Morning Ridge and Summer Breeze Apartments. Currently, we are working with the Alcohol Beverage Control on a juvenile decoy-buy program to enhance Operation ERACIT. We are planning and preparing the P.O.P. Team and the Temecula Sheriff Reserves for Summer Nights, as well as the Western Days and Frontier Days events. We are currently continuing with the TAG Program. We now have fourteen trained resident volunteers for the P.O.P. Team. R:\SYERSK~IONTHLY~JOH~q. JUN 3/23/9~ jrm North Puiol Redevelopment Project The Affirmed Housing Group of Escondido has submitted an application for Mortgage Revenue Bonds and Tax Credits. Staff has reviewed preliminary plans for the new units and rehabilitation of the existing units preliminary pro forma for the project. The proposed project will rehabilitate the existing 38 apartment units and develop 18 new units on the vacant acre of land. In addition, Affirmed is negotiating with an adjacent property owner to enlarge the project. The additional property would yield 20 more units. A formal agreement will be brought back to the Agency next month. OLD TOWN Old Town Streetscape Improvement Projects · On March 31, 1998, the Council is scheduled to authorize the plans and specifications for the Streetscape Project. Bids are anticipated to be awarded in late June and construction to begin early July. Facade Improvement Non-Conforming Sign Program The following facade improvement projects are underway: · Temecula Creek Plaza (southwest corner of Sixth and Front) -paint and minor repairs · Long Branch Antiques (Formerly Napa Auto Parts) -facade renovation The following facade improvement project is completed: · The Bank Restaurant - paint The following facade improvement applications are being processed: · Second Street Automotive -complete facade renovation · Rancon Building -repaint trim Staff has also met with several other interested property and business owners. Old Town Temecula Market Study · Keyser Marston Associates of San Diego met with business owners, property owners, community stakeholders and City Staff on March 3, 1998 to receive input to the study. Surveyors will be in Old Town next week. The study will be complete in 45 days. R :\S YER S K~MON'ITILY~JOI~q. JUN 3/23/9g jrm CITY OF TEMECULA MEMORANDUM TO: Executive Director/Agency Members FROM: Mary Jane McLarney, Redevelopment Director DATE: March 31, 1998 REGARDING: Marketing Department Activities Report Economic Development and Tourism Update Prepared by: Barbara McLean, Marketing Technician MEDIA OUTREACH REPORT Monthly calendar of events and press releases continue to go out to the media. TOURISM The City will be a gold sponsor in the California Travel Market, which is a partnership between the California Division of Tourism and the California Travel Industry Association. This show will be held on March 24-27 in San Diego. The City is currently working with the Inland Empire Tourism Council to strategically plan FAM Tours for this event. This travel show will enable Temecula to cost-effectively promote our area to key international tour operators and the press. This annual by-invitation-only event will attract 120 VlP international buyers and 25 international press. The City will be represented by the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce. The City provided an article on Temecula's tourism industry for the Chamber of Commerce Newsletter. This will be done on a monthly basis. The newsletter is distributed to approximately 1200 businesses and available at the Chamber for visitors. The updated information on Temecula for the "San Diegan" publication has been finalized. The "San Diegan" is an annual publication and distributed through hotels in the San Diego and a 50 mile radius area, which includes Mexico. It is also distributed through the Human Resource Departments of San Diego area businesses. The newest issue will be released in July. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Packets which include our business kits, community profile, and workforce report are being sent to 73 key site selectors throughout the United States to familiarize them with the opportunities available in Temecula. We are producing a new Real Estate Outlook (real estate industry newsletter) which contains information obtained from Dr. John Husing, the TVEDC, and local commercial real estate brokers. The newsletter will be sent out the week of March 30th to business owners, real estate professionals, TVEDC members, and included in our business kits. The City has been working with a new photographer to obtain new photography for the new trade show booth and the demographic brochure, The City is currently working with the EDC to provide a demographic brochure to be used at trade shows and in our business kits. This will be a high-quality four-color booklet highlighting information from the report form the community profile report compiled by Dr. John Husing. Leads and/nquiries In the month of February, we responded to 3 leads and 22 inquiries. OLD TOWN PROMOTION Western Days are being planned for April 17, 18 and 19. Included in the activities will be the Old Town Gunfighters, live music, shopping promotions, Sheriff's posse, and live theatrical performances. This will coincide with the Grand Opening of the Temecula Stage Stop and the McDonald's Restaurant. Bus tour operators, travel writers and the press will receive a 45- minute walking tour of Old Town and a reception at the Old Town Wine Tasting shop. Frontiers Days will be held May 22-24 to coincide with the Frontier Days Rodeo. Cross promotion is being coordinated with the Temecula Town Association. FAST TRACK The Bostik building will consist of 140,000 sq. ft.; Phase I - 45,625 sq. ft.; Phase II - 94,375 sq. ft.. They are planning to open in July of 1998. Western Telecom, located at the corner of Winchester & Zero Drive, is a 16,000 sq.ft. building. Four-Sher's 226,000 sq.ft. industrial office building is currently under construction. Completion date is slated for early summer '98. CW Assets have currently constructed five light industrial buildings using the Fast Track program. (See listing under speculative building section.) SPECULATIVE BUILDING Approximately 300,000 sq.ft. of speculative industrial space is in various stages of development in Temecula. Four-Sher Development, a San Diego based developer, is developing two speculative buildings which are planned to serve either manufacturing, distribution or assembly business users. One development includes a 38,300 sq.ft. industrial building and the second encompasses 28,700 sq.ft. both located on Business Park Drive within the Rancho California Business Park. Utilizing the City's Fast Track program, SPT Holdings currently has two 46,000 sq.ft. speculative buildings under construction in the Winchester Highlands Business Park. The developments are designed for an industrial/warehouse or office user. A ribbon cutting is planned for Thursday, March 26th. San Diego-based CW Assets have currently constructed five light industrial buildings using the Fast Track program. The buildings range in size from 9,490 sq.ft. up to 11,492 sq.ft. And are located in the Westside Business Centre. Attachments: Chamber of Commerce Activity Report Temecula Valley Economic Development Corporation Activities Monthly Report Temecula Valley Film Council Activity Report 27450 Ynez Road, Suite 104 Temecula, CA 92591 Phone (909) 676-5090 · Fax (909) 694-0201 ......... February 23, 1998 Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula CA 92590 Dear Ron: Attached please find the Monthly Activity Report provided as per our contract with the City of Temecula. *We have changed the format of the Monthly Activity Report to make it easier to read. This is the month of January at a glance: Business Inquiry Highlights · 17 businesses requested information on starting or relocating their business in Temecula Committee Highlights · Membership Committee's Chamber Ambassadors attended 10 ribbon cutting ceremonies in the month of January for businesses and Chamber members. · Tourism Committee will have the Weekend Visitor Center open before the Rod Run to assist visitors with tourist information. · Ways & Means hosted the successful Mystery of Mardi Gras Installation Banquet. The event recognized individuals and businesses for the exemplary commitment to the community. · Local Business Promotions Committee is working to make the 1998 Shop Temecula First Campaigns bigger and better than ever! · Governmental Committee hosted the Good Moming Washington Breakfast on January 16. Congressman Ron Packard spoke to 85 breakfast attendees. Tourism Highlights · Melody Brunsting, President of TVCC and Alice Sullivan, Executive Director of TVCC, spoke to the Southwest Manufacturers Council. · Kelly Daniels, Operations Director of TVCC and Vicki Barnes, Tourism Promotions Coordinator of TVCC, gave a presentation to Thousand Trails Campgrounds. · A press kit was sent to Quick Escapes, a publication in Beverly Hills, for their October issue. · 150 Visitor Guides to Motel 6 for distribution to people staying at the hotel. · 50 City with a Vision, 50 Temecula Brochures, 50 Visitor Guides, 50 Winery Brochures to Outdoor Resorts for a tour for visitors from all over the country. · 50 City Maps to City of Temecula for distribution to City residents. · 30 Visitor Guides to Mercedes Club of America for a car rally in February. · 20 Old Town Maps, 20 Visitor Guides, 20 Winery Brochures to Bob Curry for a group of senior citizens visiting Temecula. · 15 City Maps, 15 Temecula Brochures, 15 Visitor Guides to Zev Buffman's Office for potential investors for leasing. Activity Report · Tourism phone calls up by 31.04 percent from last year · Overall phone calls are up by 105.92 percent from last year. · Overall walk-ins up by 154.67 percent from last year. Also attached are the Meeting Minutes for the Local Business Promotions, Tourism, Education and Governmental Action Committees and month end Postage/Xerox Totals. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at the Chamber. Smcere. ly~ Ali~ee ~ul~ivan Executive Director Mayor Ronald H. Roberts Mayor Pro Tem Steven J. Ford Councilman Jeff Comerchero Councilman Karel F. Lindemans Councilman Jeffery E. Stone Mary Jane McLamey, Redevelopment Director Gloria Wolnick, Marketing Coordinator TVCC Board of Directors March 9, 1998 Economic Development Corporation [emecula l ?dler Ms. Mary Jane McLarney Redevelopment Director City of Temecula P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 RE: 'I'VEDC Activities Monthly Report Attached is a narrative summary of 'I'VEDC activities through February. Actually reference is made to the NEPCON show Judi and I attended last week. This information will also appear in our next newsletter, due out in a week or so. In addition to the activities reported here, we have also: · Distributed about a dozen packets to realtors who requested them, but who do not reveal their client (since January). Made business visitation assignments. Individual teams have not yet reported back to me. Randy Williams has agreed to assume the Chair for the Visitation Task Force. As soon as scheduling permits, we will reinitiate regular meetings to stimulate action. Conducted two of the planned appreciation lunches -International Rectifier and Plant Equipment. Continued to work with the marketing partners; as of today, we are nearing completion of new industrial marketing piece in collaboration with your office. Started the incubator feasibility study. The survey instrument has been drafted, but is being set-up on the word processor. I will get a copy to you for your review and comment as soon as it is finished. I anticipate making a presentation before the SWRCMC on March 11 and hope to distribute the survey. I believe this covers our primary contract activities. Please call me at 695-5130 if any of this is unclear or if you have other questions. Signed, Executive Director Enclosure Po.~t (.)fficc ll~)x I .'~gg · 'l~'mccul:t. (;,\ 02~0~,-1.5;~8 · ( )t'llcc ')()9/(~9~-~,150 · FAX 900/¢~')~,-=, 126 Activity Report Business Development Since last Fall, The TVEDC has responded to 65 inquiries from individuals and firms interested in information about Temecula as a business location. That brings our total number of inquiries since July up to 115. Through our participation in TEAM California's trade show exhibit, the EDC has distributed business/community information to an estimated 250 additional businesses in the hope of expanding our name recognition and stimulating interest among companies considering expansion or relocation. 'I-VEDC staff conducted two site selection visits with major employers. One prospect has, unfortunately, postponed a California expansion, while the other continues to shop for a suitable site. Business Trade Shows Tom Eidem and Judi Staats attended the Medical Device & Manufacturing (MDM) and NEPCON Trade Shows in Anaheim. Along with the earlier trade shows, the EDC has now attended seven major events so far this year - our most ambitious effort. Quarterly Luncheons/Golf Tourney A group of 51 members and guests met at Bear Creek to hear Mr. Rick Cole of the California Local Government Commission speak on developing sustainable economies. Plans are being developed for our April luncheon. The tentative program will focus on what companies see as their critical location criteria when they are considering a relocation or expansion. Gary Youmans of Fallbrook National Bank and Tony Turski of Stadium Pizza are co-chairs of the 1998 Golf Tournament. The tourney will be in June and Gary and Tony need volunteers. Call the EDC office if you are interested. Other TVEDC staff and volunteers have offered assistance to three businesses in resolving code issues arising from remodeling and expansion plans. The Incubator Feasibility Study is underway and a survey of interest is being administered locally. For the time being, it is hoped that the Incubator can be incorporated into the One Stop Career Center project. A combined Center will enhance affordability, facilitate streamlined administration and present a more comprehensive image. Tom Eidem made a presentation to the Southwest Riverside County Manufacturer's Council on the Incubator concept. Annual elections to the Board of Directors are approaching. Members interested in seeking a seat on the Board should contact the TVEDC office. All names will be submitted to the Nominating Committee. The recruitment process to find a new Executive Director was initiated in mid- February. Tom Eidem's contract term expires in June, at the end of the fiscal year, and he indicated he will not seek to renew the contract position. The City of Temecula will again assist the TVEDC in recruiting qualified candidates. FILM COUNCIL ACTIVI'FY REPORT DECEMBER, JANUARY The months following a resoundingly successful Film Festival have shown to be other than normal. Our Executive Director performed so well she caught the attention of long time film industry member, Herb Margolis and was wooed away for a real paying position as Director of the inaugural San Diego Film Festival. Having worked with !o Moulton on the Film Council for the last four years, this last one being the most intense, !he Director now replacing Jo Moulton had the advantage of gaining valuable insight into the intricacies of Film Council activilies through involvement in scouting for multiple location sites and by working as one of the crew for a video production and a feature length film. The Ci~ Council needs to be aware that Io Moulton has not altogether abandoned Temecula as exhibited by her generous gift of time in working with the new Director in order to create a smoother transition. (For additional background, please read the attached letter to the Board members from the new director). DECEMBER 1997 Education 1'brough Entertainment produced a film which included one day of filming in Meadowview with Ihe use of a school bus and "school children". Allhough a great amount of the remaining film was shot in the studio, crew members were housed in the Comfort Inn for six nights. Twelve local people were employed. Economic impact: Approximately $20,000. Contact was made from a local Realtor who had signed a contract with a major music production company for locating a working site to be used for four to six months in the Temecula area. No contract has vet been signed, although the agent has been paid.. Preliminary economic impact unknown due to privileged income information. An update will be provided if the contract is executed. JANUARY 1998 Another educational film producer required a "stately, descending staircase" for a production scheduled for lanuarv 27. Contacts were made by the Executive Director and a list of 24 possibilities was provided to the Assistant Producer. Universal Studios location scout contacted TVFC for a specific house style for an upcoming Nicolas Cage movie. The Executive Director escorted the scout around the Temecula area for several hours. No feedback yet. An indie film producer who participated in the '97 Film Festival has requested interested hotels to house 35 people for one month for a projected August shoot. The hotel facilities will actually be used in the movie. Temecula Creek Inn was contacted as well as the Embassy Suites. The producer will be visiting the area in one to two weeks. Page 2 OTHER FILM COUNCIL BUSINESS The NAPTIE trade show was more expensive than our budget would allow since the show took place in New Orleans. Our trade off was attending the Palm Springs Film Festival to acquire a ~ist of film producers and distributors for their film submissions to the Temecu~a festival. The ne~t trade show to be attended will be February 20-22 in Los Angeles where we will share a booth with the Inland Empire Film Council, our "parent council". Here, we hope to add producers and distributors to our growing ~ist of potentia~ film entries. Belonging to the "Inland Empire", our council comes under the auspices of IEFC, affiliated with IEEP. Through them we have the advantage of a bigger umbrella~ a parent organization who can benefit us greatly in terms of expenses by utilizing their knowledge and resources. With Temecu~a's notoriety in the film industry on the upswing we need to take advantage of the industry's recognition. Car~ Reiner did what he said he would do - promote ]-emecu~a by word of mouth~ as evidenced by feedback received through the Council. We need the IEFC if we are to grow. Naturally our expenses will increase considerably if we are to expand and move the Film Festival event from a "more and pop" production to one even more sophisticated. It is highly likely, for instance, that we won't escape paying a fee for the theaters as we did for the '97 Festival. We're entering 1998 with the goal of ftne tuning expenses, increasing sponsorship of all levels, adding fund-raisers, increasing local attendance and expanding the awareness of Temecula as a city. Even with the cost cutting segment of our goals, budget requirements will no doubt increase. One maior challenge is securing professional resources to contribute Io the Festival's success wilhout breaking our budget. We began our inaugural festival with first class collateral materials and musl keep this level of professionalism. l'bis is a deftnile challenge and may contribute to increased expenses. r\nother professional resource challenge is that of the Executive Director's position. Currently, it pays close to a minimum wage for duties outlined on the allached lelter to the Council. Zn order to take this to a level befitting a first rate festival, we need to consider acquiring a budget that will allow us to do so. The new director is accepting the present compensation schedule in the meantime. A realistic, but expanded budget will be submilted to the City Council at the proper time. WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA WINCHESTER HILLS FINANCING AUTHORITY MARCH 17, 1998 An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority was called to order at 8:58 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Comerchero presiding. PRESENT: 4 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Ford, Lindemans, Stone, and Comerchero. ABSENT: 1 AUTHORITY MEMBER: Roberts. Also present were Executive Director Bradley, City Attorney Thorson, and Acting City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 10, 1998 1.2 Approve the minutes of February 24, 1998 MOTION: Authority Member Lindemans moved to approve Consent Calendar No. 1. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Stone and voice vote of those present reflected unanimous approval with the exception of Agency Member Roberts who was absent. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director noted that staff is expeditiously moving forward with this project. AUTHORITY MEMBERS' REPORTS None. Minutes.WH FA\031798 1 Temecula Winchester Hills Financina Authority 031798 ADJOURNMENT At 8:59 P.M., the Temecula Winchester Hills Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, March 31, 1998, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Acting City Clerk/Authority Secretary Minutes. WHFA\031798 2 ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINANCE//~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council Ronald E. Bradley, City Manager March 31, 1998 Public Facility Deposits for Non-Residential Development PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance Allie Kuhns, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the information provided concerning the Public Facility Deposits which have been collected for non-residential development since 1991 and provide direction to Staff to resolve. BACKGROUND: From the City's incorporation on December 1, 1989 until May 26, 1997, there were no established development impact fees for public facilities other than fire facilities and traffic signals. To deal with this issue, the City collected mitigation fees for traffic signals and fire facilities, but did not collect for any other public facilities which would be impacted by development. In lieu of these other public facility mitigation fees, the City entered into individual agreements with developers. These agreements have evolved over the years into four different forms (a sample of each provided as Attachments A-1 through A-4) all of which state that the developers agree to deposit with the City a sum equal to $2.00 per square foot up to $10,000 until the City adopts permanent fees. As of today, the City is holding 77 deposits. Attachment B lists all deposits collected since July 23, 1991. Attachment C provides the amounts each developer would owe to the City under the adopted development impact fee structure which was implemented by Ordinance No. 97-09 in May (revised in August by Ordinance No. 97-14). This structure set the fees at 36% of the fee recommended in the Development Impact Fee Study completed by David M. Griffith & Associates for fiscal year 1997-98. If the Council decides to use the adopted fees to reconcile the deposits, then several developers will be entitled to refunds, as shown in the spreadsheet. An additional suggested alternative would be to apply a phased discount, by year, to the adopted fee. Attachment D provides the amounts which would be due if the discounts start at 10% for deposits paid in 1997, the year the fees were adopted, and escalate to a 70% discount for the earliest fees paid back in 1991. FISCAL IMPACT: If the City Council does not collect any more development impact fees based on these deposits, than the City will have collected a total of $684,681.50 with no refunds due. If the deposits are reconciled in accordance with the adopted fee schedule, the net amount due to the City will be $1.7 million. With this schedule, 19 refunds totaling $65,664 would have to be paid. If the phased discounts are applied as shown in Attachment D, the City could collect a net amount of $735,534. Under this schedule, 43 refunds totaling $139,881 would be due to developers. Attachments: A1 to A4 - Sample Development Agreements B - City of Temecula Public Facility Deposits C - Public Facility Deposits Based on Adopted Fees D - Public Facility Deposits Based on Phased Discounts of Adopted Fees ATTACHMENT A-1 SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Recording Requested by City of Temecula When recorded mail to: City of Temecula Office of the City Clerk 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Soace above this ilne for Reeorder~ Use AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITY FEE This Agreement is made this Temecula ("City") and day of ("Developer"). by and between the City of RECITALS A. Developer is the owner of real property (the "Property") in the City of Temecula described as follows: Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference B. Developer proposes to develop the Property pursuant to [Im~atlvo n~p m' pio~ pian ~t~'lll~l'~l'l~3~] (the "Project"). C. City has determined that the Project will impact traffic and the demand for other public facilities within the City as identified in the for [£1R/Ncgatlw D~lamtlonl the Project. These impacts must be mitigated by payment of a fee for additional road and public facility construction, which fee shall be identified as set forth hereinafter. Recording of this Agreement is fee exempt pursuant to Government Code Section 6103 as it is recorded for the benefit of the City of Temecula, a public agency. D. The City proposes to impose a public facility fee upon new developments within the City in order to construct additional public facility improvements to serve and benefit new developments, including the Project. These fees shall be known as the "Temecula City-wide Public Facility Fee Program" or "Public Facility Fee." agmts\ldagmts\pub facil.agr ATTACHMENT A- 1 City of Temecula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 2 E. Condition No. of the Project requires that Developer execute this Agreement prior to issuance of a building permit or conditional use permit, or recordation of the final map, as provided specifically in the conditions of approval. F. In order for Developer to proceed without full payment of the Public Facility Fee in a timely manner, City and Developer have determined to enter into this Agreement. G. The term "public facility" shall refer to public and municipal infrastructure, such as roads, highways, flood control facilities, city hall, police stations, community centers, theaters, parks and similar public infrastructure. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Public Facility Fee: (a) The City Council will establish the amount of the Public Facility Fee at some time in the future. The Fee will be based upon the square footage of each development, the vehicle trips generated by each development, or similar measure(s). The Public Facility Fee also shall establish the specific improvements to be constructed and their cost, the benefit assessment area and the method by which the fair share, pro-rata obligations of each property are to be established based on impact on traffic and demand for public facilities. Co) Developer shall pay the Public Facility Fee on each building at such time it receives its certificate of occupancy or final inspection, which ever occurs first. (c) The Council also may establish an Interim Public Facility Fee to be followed by a Final Public Facility Fee. If only the Interim Public Facility Fee has been established at the time the Developer seeks issuance of its certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs first, then Developer shall pay the Interim Fee prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs first. Later, when the Final Public Facility Fee is established, the Developer will be reimbursed for any difference between the Interim and Final Fee if the Interim Fee exceeds the Final Fee, and shall pay the shortfall if the Final Fee exceeds the Interim Fee. (d) If the certificate of occupancy or final inspection occurs prior to the agmts\ldagmts\pub fa¢il .agr City of Temecula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 3 establishment of the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee, then the Developer shall pay a deposit of Two Dollars ($2.00) per square foot, not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection. The deposit shall be a credit against the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee. A letter of credit or certificate of deposit may be provided in lieu of the deposit. (e) If either the Final or Interim Public Facility Fee is established after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection, the Developer shall pay the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee ten (10) days after receiving notice from the City that it has been established. (f) Notwithstanding the above, Developer shall provide City with written notification of the opening of any escrow for the sale of the Project and shall provide in the escrow instructions that if the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has been established, the Fee shall be paid to the City from the sale proceeds in escrow prior to distributing the proceeds to Developer/seller. (g) City shall record a release of this Agreement upon payment of all Public Facility Fees owing and shall provide Developer with a copy of such release. 2. Use of Public Facilitv Fee: The Public Facility Fee collected pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only to construct City-wide traffic and public facility improvements, which improvements are deemed to be of benefit to Project, and for expenses incidental thereto. There is a reasonable relationship between the Project and the Public Facility Fee in that the Project will impact traffic and existing public facilities, and consequently, will require expansion of the City-wide street and highway system, and public facilities in order to meet the added demand resulting from the Project. The amount of the Public Facility Fee to be collected from Project represents the cost of facilities necessary to meet the incremental increase in traffic and demand for public facilities resulting from the Project. 3. Information Provided: Developer shall provide to City, upon City's request therefor, any and all information regarding access to the Project, traffic flow, trip generation factors and such other information as is reasonably necessary to establish the Public Facility Fee. agmts\ldagmts\pub facil.agr City of Temecula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 4 4. Security for Public Facility Fee: (a) If the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has been established prior to issuance of a building permit or other entitlement described in Recital E, then, concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Developer shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit or other form of security approved by City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in an amount equal to the total Public Facility Fee for the Project. The amount of security may be increased upon City's request should there be an increase in the amount of the Public Facility Fee. The amount of security also may be reduced upon Developer's payment of Public Facility Fees outstanding. However, except for the deposit provided for in Section 1, no letter of credit is required if neither the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has not been established as of the date of execution of this Agreement. (b) As an alternative to collecting the fee from the letter of credit, if the Developer fails to pay the Public Facility Fee within thirty (30) days of the date demand is made, the City may assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount owing and make said Fee, inclusive of penalty, a lien upon the described real property by recording a notice that said Fee is due under the terms of this Agreement with the County Recorder of Riverside County. The notice shall state the fact that said Fee, inclusive of penalty, is due under the terms of this Agreement and shall state the amount, together with the fact that it is unpaid and draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set tbrth at California Revenue & Taxation Section 19269 until paid. (c) The City may as an alternative to the lien procedure set forth above, bring legal action to collect the Public Facility Fee due. The Developer agrees that if legal action by the City is necessary to collect the Fee the Developer agrees to pay the City a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and court costs, together with penalty and interest determined according to Paragraph 4(b) of this Agreement. 5. Agreement Runs With Land: This Agreement pertains to and runs with the Property. This Agreement binds the successors in interest of each of the parties. agmts\ldagmts\pub£a¢il.agr City of Temecula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 5 6. Waiver: By execution of this Agreement, Developer waives any right to protest the provisions of Condition No. of the Project, this Agreement, the formation of any Public Facility fee district, but not the nexus between any Public Facility fee and the Project. 7. Binding Agreement: This Agreement shall be binding upon Developer, Developer's successors and assigns. 8. Amendment/No Continuing Waiver: This Agreement may be modified or amended only in writing, signed by both parties. This Agreement contains the full and complete understanding of the parties and supersedes any and all prior oral or written agreements or representations. A waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not be deemed a continuing waiver thereof. 9. Attorneys' Fees: Should either party determine that it is necessary to file a legal action to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation shall be entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to attorneys' fees. 10. Notice: Notice shall be deemed given under this Agreement when in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first-class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: CITY: DEVELOPER: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk 5. Miscellaneous Provisions (a) If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected. agmts\ldagmts\pub facil .agr City of Temeeula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 6 (b) If there is more than one (1) signer of this Agreement as Developer, their obligations are joint and several. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties or their duly authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date set out above. CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPER By: By: Ronald E. Bradley City Manager ATTEST: By: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter Thorson, City Attorney agmts\ldagmts\pub facil .agr City of Temecula Public Facility Fee Agreement Page 7 Form of Condition: Developer shall pay a building permit or any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or f'mal public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall pay a deposit of $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000, and execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. In imposing this condition, the City finds as follows: 1. The fee collected will be used for City-wide road and public facility improvements. 2. The road and public facility improvements (or portions thereof) to be financed will serve the project by providing access, reducing congestion, and providing adequate public facilities, such as, but not limited to, City Hall, police station, fire station, community center and parks. 3. There is a need for such road and public facility improvements for the project as the project will generate traffic onto the roads to be improved and demand for additional public facilities. 4. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the road and public facility improvements in that the amount of the fee is no more than the amount of benefit to be received by each unit from access to and use of the road and public facility improvements. agmts\ldagmts\pub facil .agr ATTACHMENT A-2 SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC FACILITY FEE Tract No. Bond No. Parcel Map No. Premium Plot Plan No. Surety Principal Address Address City City WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (hereinafter "City"), County of Riverside, State of California, and (herein designated as "Principal"), have entered into the attached agreement whereby the Principal, recognizing the impact of his development on public facilities, has agreed as a condition of approval of the map to mitigate the impact of the development by payment to the City of a sum of money to be used for mitigation of such impact; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement, Principal is required to deposit with the City or deposit against the future public facility fee; NOW, therefore, we, the Principal and as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City, in the penal sum of DOLLARS ($ ) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, successors, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such that if the above-bonded Principal, his or its heirs, executors, administrators, successors, or assigns, shall in all things stand to and abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and provisions in the said agreement and any alternation thereof made as therein provided, on his or their part, to be kept and performed at the time in the manner therein specified, and in all respects according to their true intent and meaning, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees, as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise it shall be and remain in full force and effect. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified therefor, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable ATTACHMENT A-2 agmts\ldagmts\pub facil ,agr attorney's fees, incurred by the City in successfully enforcing such obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement shall in any way affect its obligation on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the agreement. Surety further stipulates and agrees that the provisions of Section 2845 of the Civil Code are not a condition precedent to the Surety's obligations hereunder and are hereby waived by the Surety. When the required payment covered by the agreement is made, the City will thereupon release the obligation of this bond. in witness thereof, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above-named on , 19 NAME OF PRINCIPAL: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE(S) BY: Title Title Title (IF CORPORATION, AFFIX SEAL) NAME OF SURETY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: Its Attorney-In-Fact Title (IF CORPORATION, AFFIX SEAL) ATTACH NOTARIAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SIGNATURE OF PRINCIPAL AND ATTORNEY- IN-FACT. agmts\ldagmts\pub£acil.agr ATTACHMENT A-3 SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BANK OF COMMERCE CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecuia, CA 92390 LETTER OF CPdEDIT Letter of Credit Nc. 9!-014- Re: Instrument of Credit Delivered as Performance Security for Public Facilities Fee. Gentlemen: Bank of Commerce, a financial institution, subject to regulati~ by the State of California or the Federal Government of the United States of America, delivers to the City of Temecula this instrument credit as security for performance of the Agreement For Payment Of Public Facilities Fee, dated June 13, 1991 by and between the City Temecula and Bank of Commerce, and referred to herein and by this reference made a part hereof, subject to the following conditions: I. We pledge that we hold and will hold on deposit the sum of Ten Thousand dollars ($10,000.00) as trust funds guaranteed for payme uo City of Temecula to secure faithful performance by Bank of Commer( (hereinafter referred to as "Principal") of the Agreement for payment of Public Facility Fee. Upon demand by the City Manager of the City of Temecula, t! whole or any portion of said funds shall be paid forthwith to the Cit should the Principal fail to perform any of its obligations to the C2 under the Agreement For Payment of Public Facility Fee. II. No amendment to the Agreement For Payment of Public Faci!it Fee, agreed to by City of Temecula and Principal, shall relieve us f] liability on this letter of credit. We hereby give consent for any s~ amendments to be made without further notice to or consent by us. We hereby hold ourselves bound without regard to and independently of a~ action against Principal whenever taken. We further agree that if Cit of Temecula sues on this letter of credit, we will pay, in addition 1 the face value of this leuter, all its reasonable costs, expenses an( attorneys fees incurred by it in successfully enforcing such obligation, to be awarded and fixed by the couru, and to be -1- ATTACHMENT A-3 BANK OF COMMERCE taxed as costs and to be included in the judgement therein rendered. This instrument of credit is irrevocable. Financial Institution Bank of Commerce /A~te ven' D~i s t Firs~ Vice President & Manager Principal By:Bank of Commerce /Steven D ./A~lquist First Vice President & Manager I swear under penalty of perjury that I have authority to bind the above-named financial institution ~o the terms of this letter of credit. Executed at Temecula, California, on January 2, 1992 Signature Approved as ~o Form: By: Scott F. Field City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA 27315 JEFFERSON AVENUE, SUITE F-l, TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA 92390-5609 ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDq,-MENT Slate of California County of Riverside ©n January 2, DATE personally appeared 1992 before me, Donna Li!e NAME. TITLE OF OFFICE~ - E.G., 'JANE DOE. NOTARY PUBLIC' CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER l'"l INDIVIDUAL(S) [] CORPORATE OFFICER{~) ]st V~ce Pre~. TITLEiSI [] PARTNER(S} ATTORNEY-IN-FACT TRUSTEE(S) SUBSCRIBING WITNESS GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR OTHER: Steven D. AhlquisC [] NAME(S} OF SiGNER(S) [] personally known to me - OR - [] proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence [] to be the person(][) whose name0~) subscribed to the within instrument and ac- knowledged to me that he/~ executed [] the same in his~ authorized capacity(::ira~, and that by his/17_,~0X]Oi~z~ signature(s3 on the instrument the person~), or me entity upon behalfofwhichtheperson~) SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: acted, execu[ea me instrument. _=~~~'~,~~v Bank of Co~erce /~-~> OFFICIAL SEAL ~ Witness my hah0 and official seat. ~ ~';-~: ~;-~ DONNA LILE O ~ ,~ ~'~ Notary Public - California Mycommfssionex~iresApri129, 1994 ~ ~ XO~ ~. . ~ SIGNATURE A~ENTION NOTARY: AIt~ou~ the tnlorma.on requesz~ ~low ~s OPTIONA~ ~1 ~u10 prevent lrau0ulenI a~acnment ot I~s ~d~cate ~o unaumor~zeO 0ocumenL THIS CERTIFICATE Title or Type of Document Letter of Credit MUST BE A~ACMED TO THE DOCUMENT Number of Pages 2 Date of Document 1 -?-q? DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above N/A ~ 1~I ~ATIONAL~R~.ASSOC~TION - ~ Reinmet Ave. · PO Box 71~4 . O~a Par~, CA 913~-71~ ATTACHMENT A-4 SAMPLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Sff/117~3.AGR (10/30/~1) When recorded mail to: City -0f Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk '3 AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC FACILITY FEE This Agreement is made this by and between the City of Temecula ("City") and ("Developer"). RECITALS A. "Property") in the City of Temecula described as follows: Developer is the owner of real property (the Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference B. Developer proposes to develop the Property '~ ~,~ f /[:l,f ~~ ,4/~6f~D$:~ (the "Project") pursuant to ;~ ~ · [,,-,,,-trv¢ m~p o~ p,ot plea id~-,ca~e] Recording of this Agreement is fee exempt pursuant to Government Code Section 6103 as it is recorded for the benefit of the City of Temecula, a public agency. -1- ATTACHMENT A-4 Sff/117333.AGR (10/30/91) 420700 332344 C. City has determined that the Project will impact traffic and the demand for other public facilities within the City as identified in the t~~~' 'P{£~'/'/~A~ for the Project. These impacts must be mitigated by payment of a fee for additional road and public facility construction, which fee shall be identified as set forth hereinafter. D. The City proposes to impose a public facility fee upon new developments within the City in order to construct additional public facility improvements to serve and benefit new developments, including the Project. These fees shall be known as the "Temecula City-wide Public Facility Fee Program" or "Public Facility Fee." E. Condition No. ~ of the Project requires that Developer execute this Agreement prior to issuance of a building permit or conditional use permit, or recordation of the final map, as provided specifically in the conditions of approval. F. In order for Developer to proceed without full payment of the Public Facility Fee in a timely manner, City and Developer have determined.to enter into this Agreement. G. The term "public facility" shall refer to public and municipal infrastructure, such as roads, highways, flood control facilities, city hall, police stations, community centers, theaters, parks and similar public infrastructure. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Public Facility Fee: -2- sff/! 17333.AOR 420?O0 3323-t4 (a) The City Council will establish the amount of the Public Facility Fee at some time in the future. The Fee will be based upon the square footage of each development, the vehicle trips generated by each development, or similar measure(s). The Public Facility Fee also shall establish the specific improve- ments to be constructed and their cost, the benefit assessment area and the method by which the fair share, pro-rata obligations of each property are to be established based on impact on traffic and demand for public facilities. (b) Developer shall pay the Public Facility Fee on each building at such time it receives its certificate of occupancy or final inspection, which ever occurs first. (c) The Council also may establish an Interim Public Facility Fee to be followed by a Final Public Facility Fee. If only the Interim Public Facility Fee has been established at the time the Developer seeks issuance of its certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs first, then Developer shall pay the Interim Fee prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection, whichever occurs first. Later, when the Final Public Facility Fee is established, the Developer will be reimbursed for any difference between the Interim and Final Fee if the Interim Fee exceeds the Final Fee, and shall pay the shortfall if the Final Fee exceeds the Interim Fee. -3- s~/l I'~$3.AOR (10/30/91) 420'700 332344 (d) If the certificate of occupancy or final inspection occurs prior to the establishment of the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee, then the Developer shall pay a deposit of Two Dollars ($2.00) per square foot, not to exceed Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection. The deposit shall be a credit against the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee. A letter of credit or certificate of deposit may be provided in lieu of the deposit. (e) If either the Final or Interim Public Facility Fee is established after the issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final inspection, the Developer shall pay the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee ten (10) days after receiving notice from the City that it has been established. (f) Notwithstanding the above, Developer shall provide City with written notification of the opening of any escrow for the sale of the Project and shall provide in the escrow instructions that if the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has been established, the Fee shall be paid to the City from the sale proceeds in escrow prior to distributing the proceeds to Developer/seller. (g) City shall record a release of this Agreement upon payment of all Public Facility Fees owing and shall provide Developer with a copy of such release. sfY/117333.AOR (10/30~1) 420'700 332344 2. Use of Public Facility Fee: The Public Facility Fee collected pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only to construct City-wide traffic and public facility improvements, which improvements are deemed to be of benefit to Project, and for expenses incidental thereto. There is a reasonable relationship between the Project and the Public Facility Fee in that the Project will impact traffic and existing public facilities, and consequently, will require expansion of the City-wide street and highway system, and public facilities in order to meet the added demand resulting from the Project. The amount of the Public Facility Fee to be collected from Project represents the cost of facilities necessary to meet the incremental increase in traffic and demand for public facilities resulting from the Project. 3. Information Provided: Developer shall provide to City, upon City's request therefor, any and all information regarding access to the Project, traffic flow, trip generation factors and such other information as is reasonably necessary to establish the Public Facility Fee. 4. Security for Public Facility Fee: (a) If the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has been established prior to issuance of a building permit or other entitlement described in Recital E, then, concurrent with -5- sff/117333.AGR (10/30/91) 420700 332344 the execution of this Agreement, Developer shall provide an irrevocable letter of credit or other form of security approved by City, in a form approved by the City Attorney, in an amount equal-~to the total Public Facility Fee for the Project. The amount of security may be increased upon City's request should there be an increase in the amount of the Public Facility Fee. The amount of security also may be reduced upon Developer's payment of Public Facility Fees outstanding. However, except for the deposit provided for in Section 1, no letter of credit is required if neither the Interim or Final Public Facility Fee has not been established as of the date of execution of this Agreement. (b) As an alternative to collecting the fee from the letter of credit, if the Developer fails to pay the Public \ Facility Fee within thirty (30) days of the date demand is made, the City may assess a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount owing and make said Fee, inclusive of penalty, a lien upon the described real property by recording a notice that said Fee is due under the terms of this Agreement with the County Recorder of Riverside County. The notice shall state the fact that said Fee, inclusive of penalty, is due under the terms of this Agreement and shall state the amount, together with the fact that it is unpaid and draws interest on the Fee and penalty at the rate set forth at California Revenue & Taxation Section 19269 until paid. lff/! r7313.AOR (10/30/91) 420700 332344 (c) The City may as an alternative to the lien procedure set forth above, bring legal action to collect the Public Facility Fee due. The Developer agrees that if legal action by the City is necessary to collect the Fee the Developer agrees to pay the City a reasonable sum as attorney's fees and court costs, together with penalty and interest determined according to Paragraph 4(b) of this Agreement. 5. Agreement Runs With Land: This Agreement pertains to and runs with the Property. This Agreement binds the successors in interest of each of the parties. 6. Waiver: By execution of this Agreement, Developer waives any right to protest the provisions of Condition No. ~ of the Project, this Agreement, the formation of any Public Facility fee district, but not the nexus between any Public Facility fee and the Project. 7. Bindinq Kqreement: This Agreement shall be binding upon Developer, Developer's successors and assigns. 8. Amendment/No Continuin~ Waiver: This Agreement may be modified or amended only in writing, signed by both parties. This Agreement contains the full and complete understanding of the parties and supersedes any -7- ,ff/i 1'7.333 420?00 332344 and all prior oral or written agreements or representations. A waiver of any term or condition of this Agreement by either party shall not be deemed a continuing waiver thereof. 9. Attorneys' Fees: Should either party determine that it is necessary to file a legal action to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in that litigation shall be entitled to its reasonable costs, including but not limited to attorneys' fees. 10. Notice: Notice shall be deemed given under this Agreement when in writing and deposited in the United States mail, first- class, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: CITY: City of Temecula 43174 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: City Clerk DEVELOPER: RvJ il P. 3 11. Miscellaneous 'Provisions (a) If any provision of this Agreement is adjudged invalid, the remaining provisions shall not be affected. (b) If there is more than one (1) signer of this Agreement as Developer, their obligations are joint and several. ,ff/117333.AGR (10/30/91) 420700 332344 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties or their duly authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the date set out above. David F. Dixon City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field City Attorney County of t(ing - ,~e dHU VOlUntary 8C~ ~Of ~h~ u~ .... ~ .......... . . . ~~9"eu ~nlS Instrument z . ~. ~ . sff~AGR17333 420700 332344 Form of Condition: Developer shall pay a building permit or any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall pay a deposit of $2.00 per square foot, not to exceed $10,000, and execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the. payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. In imposing this condition, the City finds as follows: 1. The fee collec{ed will be used for City-wide road and public facility improvements. 2. The road and public facility improvements (or portions thereof) to be financed will serve the project by providing access, reducing congestion, and providing adequate public facilities, such as, but not limited to, City Hall, police station, fire station, community center and parks. -i- PLEASE COMPLETE .; 1RMATION RECORDING REQUESTED BY: AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: 420'700 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY THIS PAGE ADDED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SPACE FOR RECORDING INFORMATION (Additional recording fee applies) ATTACHMENT B CITY OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSITS ATTACHMENT C PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSITS BASED ON ADOPTED FEES O~ ~0 m, 0000~000000000~000~0000000~00~000~0~ 0000~0000000000000~00~00~0~0~000~0~ 0000~000000~00~000~00~00r 0~0~00~0~ ~o rr~000~O~000~00~0000~O~00~O~00~ ~000~0~000~00~0000~0~00~0~00~ ATTACHMENT D PUBLIC FACILITY DEPOSITS BASED ON DISCOUNTS OF ADOPTED FEES PHASED A 8D°°~88 ~§§~8~8~8~oo 88 §~ ~o ~o~o~o o~ oo~ooo ~ ~ ~ o~o ~o o ~ ~ oo~o88~8 w w w n o f0 o EEE~EE~EEE oo oo ooo .~.E.~ o~oo = 'E ~- ~00~00~0 q~q~qq~ E '~E '~ E E'~ 8 ~o 8~ ~o~o~oo~~~ooo~oooooo ~0~0~0~000~0000~0~00~0~ ~0~0~0~000~0000~0~00~0~ ITEM 13 APPROVAl CITY ATTORNEY~ DIR. OF FINANC~ CITY MANAGER ~'~ TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager ,(,~1oseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 31, 1998 Reject all Bids for the Installation of an Interim Traffic Signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97-27 PREPARED BY: ~)Ali Moghadam P.E., Senior Engineer - Capital Projects/Traffic RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: Reject all bids for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road, Project No. PW97-27. Deny a request for installation of a traffic signal or "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Pala Road and Muirfield Road. BACKGROUND: At the February 27, 1997 Public/Traffic Safety Commission meeting, the Commission reviewed a request for installation of an "All-Way Stop" at the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road. Although the existing conditions at this intersection warranted installation of an "All-Way Stop", staff recommended that the stop signs not be installed on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road since stopping the Pala Road traffic could create major congestion on Pala Road as well as several nearby intersections. Following some discussion, the Commission recommended that the request for installation of an "All-Way Stop" be denied and the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road be placed on the City's Traffic Signal Priority List as number one priority. Installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road was approved by the City Council and was included in the Fiscal Year 1997-98 Capital Improvement Program Budget. Plans and specifications were prepared for installation of a signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road and this project was advertised for bids. Bids were opened on February 19, 1998 and award of contract was scheduled for the March 17, 1998 City Council meeting. The specifications for this project allow 90 working days for installation of the traffic signal, therefore, this signal could be in operation by late September or early October 1998. However, since the Pala Road Bridge construction is anticipated to begin in November 1998, the proposed signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road would be in operation for R:~.GDRPT\98\0331\PWg7-27.2AD/ajp approximately eight (8) months before removal. Therefore, it is recommended that the installation of an interim traffic signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road be postponed, a traffic signal be installed at the ultimate location with Pala Road Bridge project, and all bids for this project be rejected by the City Council. The City has received several requests from the residents of the area to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Pala Road and Muirfield Road instead of the proposed signal on Pala Road at Rainbow Canyon Road. Staff has studied this request and based on the existing conditions neither a traffic signal nor an WAll-Way Stop" is warranted for this intersection. This is mainly due to low traffic volumes on Muirfield Road. Our records also indicated that there has been one (1) reported accident at this intersection within the last three (3) years. Staff will monitor this intersection and take appropriate action as necessary. FISCAL IMPACT: None R:~AGDRPT\98\0331\PW97-27.2AD/ajp ITEM 14 CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA,,~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services March 31, 1998 Golf Course Properties -Temecula Special Tax PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: eryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst That the City Council: Establish the amount of the Temecula Parks/Lighting Special Tax applied to golf course properties within the City of Temecula. BACKGROUND: The City Council recently requested that staff provide information discussing the special tax rate applied to golf courses within the City of Temecula. As a result, staff has prepared the following information for the City Council to consider. Pursuant to voter approval on March 4, 1997, the maximum annual tax rate for the Temecula Parks/Lighting Special Tax was established at $74.44 per single family residence. The amount of 974.44 is equal to one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), which serves as the basis for the following land use designations: Land Use Comparable EDU's Max. Tax Amt. 1. Single Family Residential 1.0/Unit 9 74.44 2. Multi-Family Residential .75/Unit 9 55.83 3. Vacant Residential 2.0/Unit 9148.88 4. Non-Residential Vacant 4.0/Acre 9297.76 5. Non-Residential Improved 6.0/Acre 9446.64 6. Agricultural 0.5/Acre 9 37.22 Each taxable parcel within the City has been assigned a number of EDU's based on the use of the property identified within the City's Development Code and Zoning Plan. Non-residential or commercial properties are charged on a per-acre basis, given the more intense use and disparity in size between non-residential properties and a single family residence. Pursuant to the Development Code, golf courses are identified as an "outdoor commercial recreational use", which could be taxed at a rate of 6 EDU's, or 9446.64 per acre. However, staff has already made a distinction between golf courses and other non-residential uses within the City to compensate for the recreational opportunities they provide and the large acreage required for golf courses. As a result, the tax rate applied to golf courses within the City is equal to2EDU's, or 9148.88 per acre. This is one-third the amount of other non-residential, or commercial uses of the same size. An argument has been made that golf courses should not pay 2.0 EDU's per acre based upon the premise that the amount of land required to operate a golf course is much greater than a typical commercial shopping center. The following example comparing a 20 acre shopping center to a 300 acre golf course was provided to illustrate this point: Size of Property Purchase Price Number of Clients Number of Employees Gross Income Property Tax City Tax for Parks/Lighting Shopping Center Golf Course 20 acres 300 acres 912 million 912 million Tens of thousands Thousands 250 75 93 million 93 million 9120,000 9120,000 910,000 940,000 Although the above numbers have not been verified by staff, a more appropriate example, in staff's opinion, would compare 300 acres of commercial property to 300 acres of golf course property. In this comparison, a golf course would be taxed at only one-third the amount of other commercial land uses of the same size. Again, the reason golf courses are reduced from 6.0 EDU's to 2.0 EDU's per acre is because of the recreational benefits and the acreage required to operate a golf course. In summary, from a legal standpoint, the current rate of 2.0 EDU's per acre is appropriate. Therefore, the golf course issue is essentially a policy decision rather than a legal decision. The Council has the latitude to reaffirm, reduce, or raise the EDU's per acre, but in no instance, can the EDU's rate exceed 6.0 EDU's per acre. FISCAL IMPACT: Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21, the City Council is empowered to establish the amount of the special tax not to exceed the allowable rates identified above. The City Council may elect to reduce, increase, or reaffirm the current application of the tax rate for golf courses at 2~EDU's per acre. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 96-21 (City's Special Tax) ORDINANCI~ NO. 96-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ~VIECULA, CALH~ORNIA, L~VYING A SPECIAL TAX TO FINANCE THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS ~ RECREATIONAL FACII,ITIES~ RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STIIE!~r LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS ~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF T~M~'"U~4~, CAI-n~ORNIA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ,c, edinn 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, there is hereby levied and n~essed a special tax by the City of Temecula on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 1997-98. ~eetion I. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year shall be $74.44 per single-family residential dwe. lling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-re, sidential zone, ~M6.64 per acre of non-residential improved property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. ,~eetion 3. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Tcmecula. Said spccinl tax, together with all penalties and int~..,~st thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Tcmecula by the persons who own the p~trcel on the d~te the tax is due. ~ectlon 4. The revenue raised by the special tax imposed by this ordinance shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of operating, main~g, and servicing public p~rks and recreational facilities, recn:ational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Tcmecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection there, with. 1 ~edio. ~. The City Council, by three (3) affu-mativ¢ votes, is empowered to establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each final year, in amoun~ not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this ordinance, as is required to pmvidc an adeqo~?- level of service in accordance with the purposes sct forth in this ordinance. ~qecfion 6. The City Council shall be empowered to arecad this ordinance by three (3) affirmative votes of the members thereof for the purposes of carrying out the general purposes of this ordinance in order to conform to state law that permits the County Tax Collector, or other proper of£~-ial, to collect a special tax such as is levied by fitis ordinance in conjunction with County U.xes or in order to assign duties pursuant to the ordinance to other officers. Rection 7. No section of this ordinance shall be construed to permit, and the City Council is expressly prohibited from, increasing the amounts of the special tax imposed by this ordinance beyond the maximum amounts set forth in this ordinance. gectltm it. A property owner subject to the special tax may appeal the amount of the special tax to be levied on such property owner's property pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council. Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax during a specific fi,~al year would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owners may appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council. · qectlon 10. Th~ special tax imposed by this ordinanc~ shah not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Neetion 11. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic- tion, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance ar~ declared to be severable. The City Council, and the electorate by referendum, do hereby declare that they would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespectivc of the fact that any onc or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ~qection 1'2. This ordinance, or any provisions thereof other than those provisions, if any, which provide for modification by the City Council of the City of Temecula, nmy only be amended or repealed by approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting on the ordinance or provisions thereof at any initiative or referendum election. 9~-21 ,2 .~floa 1~. The Tcmecula Community Scrvice. s District cummtly opcrate. s, maintains lind services public par~ and recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, art~al street lights and traffic signals within the City of Tcmecula. These services must be continued without ~terruptlon in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of th~ residents therein and the general public. The adoption of Proposition 218 by the voters of the State of California has brought into question the ability of th~ Temecula Community Services District to continue imposing rates and charges to finance such services. Unless a special tax is imposed to finance such services, th~ City may lack sufficient funds to continue such s~rvicea. This ordinance would convert ceilsin existing Temecula Community Services District rates and charscs to a lax. Imposition of a special lax requires two-thirds voter approval. Therefore, it is necessary to detmmine, at the earlie.st date posslbl~ prior to luly 1, 1997, wbether a special tax shall be levied upon parcels within the City to finance such services. In order for the ordinance to be plac~ on the ballot for the next county-administered election on March 4, 1997, the City must submit the ordinance to the County of Riverside prior to the dam of tl~ next regular City Council meeting. P. ecause of the County's deadline, there is insufficient time for the City Council to have two readings of the ordinance prior to its adoption and submission to the County. It is therefore urgent that this ordinance be adopted immediately to prevent an interruption in services to be provided to re. aidents of the City. An interruption in such service is of great public concern in that inadequate maintenance of public park and recreational facilities and street lighting and landscaping and curtailment of recreational and community services programs, may endanger the health, welfa~ and safety of schoolchildren, motorists, and residents of the City. This ordinance is nece.,~ary for the immediate preservahon of the public health, safety and welfare, declares tbe facts constituting the urgency, and is passed by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council. Accordingly, this measure is adopted immediately upon introd~tion pursuant to Government Code Section 36934. ~ection 14. This ordinance shall be re~ to, and shah be effective only if approved by two-thirds (2/3) majority of the voters voting at an election to be held on March 4, 1997, and shall go into effect ten (10) days aft~ the City Council has, by resolution, declared that this ordinance was approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting thereon. geefinn !_~. The City Clerk shall certify to the pa.~ge and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause same to be published as required by hw. PASSED, APPROVED ~ ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Ternecula this 26th day of Novernbex, 1996. ~/ ATTEST: Greek, C3ty Clerk-~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ~IDE)S$ CITY OF TF_.M~ULA ) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Tcmecu~, do here, by certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 9~-21 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 26th day of November, 1996, by the following vote: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Ford, Stone, Lindemarts NOF..~: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Roberts .--6reck, City Cler~,-CMC 9~21 · ITEM 15 APPROV~ CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINA CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Shawn D. Nelson, Director of Community Services March 31, 1998 Appeal of 1997-98 Temecula Parks/Street Lighting Tax: Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course PREPARED BY: ~'Beryl Yasinosky, Development Services Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 98-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PARK/STREET LIGHTING TAX LEVIED AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN BACKGROUND: Beginning with fiscal year 1997-98, the rates and charges previously levied by the TCSD against the Temecula Creek Inn property were replaced by the City's special tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21, the City Council is empowered to establish the amount of the special tax levy each fiscal year, not to exceed the maximum tax rates identified in the Ordinance. By its Resolution No. 97-72, adopted on June 24, 1997, the City Council established the annual tax for fiscal year 1997-98 at $71.44 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU), which is less than the allowable maximum rate of $74.44 per EDU. Pursuant to the special tax, each parcel within the City is assigned a number of EDU's based on the use of the property. Six categories of land uses were established: single-family residential (which was assigned 1 EDU per dwelling unit), multi-family residential (0.75 EDU per dwelling unit), single-family vacant (2 EDU's per acre), non-residential vacant (4 EDU's per acre), non-residential improved (6 EDU's per acre), and agricultural (.50 EDU's per acre). Under this methodology, the Temecula Creek Inn was to be assigned 6 EDU's, based on the fact that it is non-residential improved property. Because Staff recognized that golf courses provide recreational benefits that are available to the public it was determined that they be taxed at a rate of 2 EDU's per acre, one-third of the taxable rate for other improved commercial properties. R: \yasinobk\agendas\temcrk98.apl On December 2, 1997, the City Clerk's office received a written appeal from Mr. Paul Reed, representing the company managing the Temecula Creek Inn, seeking a refund of the rates and charges paid to the TCSD in fiscal year 1996-97 for nine parcels comprising the golf course area, and a refund of the special taxes paid to the City for these parcels for fiscal year 1997- 98. DISCUSSION: Fiscal Year 1996-97 Rates and Charges On November 27, 1996, Mr. Reed filed an appeal of the rates and charges levied on the Property for fiscal year 1996-97. The appeal was granted in part, and rejected in part by the General Manager in a letter to Mr. Reed dated April 9, 1997. Based upon the information provided, 22.7 acres of the property was determined undevelopable due to slope and flood plain restrictions. Mr. Reed did not appeal this determination. However, the portion of the appeal challenging the classification of the property was rejected, stating that levy of 2.0 EDU's per acre was appropriate. On May 13, 1997, by its Resolution No. CSD 97-04, the Board of Directors further denied an appeal of this determination and the Secretary of the District gave Mr. Reed written notice of the Board's decision on May 27, 1997. As set forth above, the TCSD resolved this appeal in accordance with the TCSD's Appeal Standards and Procedures for fiscal year 1996-97. Fiscal Year 1997-98 Special Tax Beginning with fiscal year 1997-98, the TCSD rates and charges were replaced by the City's special tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. In his letter dated December 1, 1997, Mr. Reed, the appellant, has based his appeal on two grounds: First, he asserts that there is no rational relationship between the charges that have been levied on the subject property and the level of benefit enjoyed by or provided to the subject property. Secondly, the appellant protests the increase in the levy on the subject property from 0.5 EDU's in fiscal year 1995-96 to 2 EDU's per acre in fiscal year 1996-97 without any change in land use of the subject property and without any increase in the level of service provided to the subject property. In response to the first issue, staff continues to believe that a commercial use, such as the one conducted on the subject property, is a more intense use than a single family parcel. Staff has already reduced the amount of the rates and charges against the subject property to one-third the amount of other non-residential uses of the same size, to compensate for differences between recreational uses and other non-residential uses. Non-residential uses are also more appropriately charged on a per acre basis, given the disparity in size between non-residential parcels and the corresponding disparity in the number of customer and employees using those properties and using the services and facilities provided to those properties by the City. The 0.5 EDU per acre levied against the subject property in fiscal year 1995-96 was based on the fact that the property was classified as "agricultural" for that year. As noted in its May 20, 1996 letter, staff determined in early 1996 that agricultural land uses no longer existed within the City's Development Code. Therefore, the "agricultural" category was not an appropriate classification for fiscal year 1996-97. Under the City's special tax, agricultural rates are R: \yaslnobk\agend as\temcrk98 .apl included, but only as a method to identify properties where existing agricultural operations are in effect. The subject property of this appeal, which had previously been erroneously classified as "agricultural", was reclassified as non-residential. This change in classification constituted a correction in the EDU counts applied to the property, consistent with other golf courses in the City, and is not an increase. The appellant also compares a 20 acre commercial shopping center with a 300 acre golf course, stating that "there is no rationale relationship between the intangible and indirect benefit of parks and recreation facilities and the density or use or size of the parcel". Staff contends that the appropriate comparison would identify 300 acres of commercial shopping center versus 300 acres of golf course property. Under this scenario, the golf course charges are equivalent to one third the amount of the commercial charges of the same size parcel. In addition, staff compared the Rancho Bernardo Landscape Maintenance District (RBLMD) assessments with the Temecula Special tax. First, the RBLMD assesses all taxable parcels, including golf courses, for the maintenance of medians, street lights, parkway landscaping, street sweeping and graffiti control. However, parkway landscaping is the primary function of this District. There are no public parks or recreational facilities included in this assessment. The RBLMD is similar to Service Level C within the Temecula Community Services District, which provides parkway landscaping and slope maintenance services. The RBLMD charges golf courses 0.2 EDU's per acre for parkway landscape maintenance services. In Temecula, golf courses are not charged at all for parkway landscaping and slope maintenance services. Further, median maintenance and arterial street lighting within the City's Special Tax account for only 3% of the total tax. 97% of the tax applies to public parks and recreational facilities and services. Based upon this information, the appellants analysis of the RBLMD is not relevant when comparing services provided through the City's Special Tax. According to the appeal procedures adopted by the Council, the Council must consider the following factors when determining whether to grant an appeal: (1) whether the property in whole or in part is used for the purpose intended for that classification, (2) whether the classification of the property represents the appropriate zoning of the property; and (3) whether unique or special circumstances of the property or land use regulations affecting it (e.g., slope and flood plain restrictions), support a modification of the classification. Based on the above discussion, Staff believes that the subject property is being used for non- residential purposes, that the classification adequately reflects the service received by the subject property, and that Staff has sufficiently reduced the special tax against the subject property to account for unique and special circumstances of the property. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council deny the appeal. FISCAL IMPACT: On June 13, 1997, the TCSD informed Mr. Reed that the rates and charges are determined, in part, by the amount of acreage per parcel and requested that additional information identifying the proportion of the 22.7 acres to be removed from each of the effected parcels. The TCSD informed Mr. Reed that upon receipt of this information, a refund in the amount of 93,379.58 would be processed for the Property and the excluded acreage would be carried forward to future tax years. As of this date, Mr. Reed has not provided the TCSD with this information. Upon submittal of the previously requested parcel information, staff is prepared to refund the property owner the equivalent of 22.7 acres of undevelopable property, for fiscal year 1996-97 and 1997-98. R: \yasinobk\agendas\temerk98 .apl A reduction in the amount of the 1997-98 special tax against the subject property from 2 EDU's per acre to 0.5 EDU's per acre, as requested by the appellant, will result in a loss of $29,572.94 to the City. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. Resolution No. 98- Appeal Form for FY 1997-98 and December 1, 1997 letter from Paul Reed. Ordinance No. 96-21. Resolution No. 97-72. R:\yasinobk\agendas\temcrk9$. apl RESOLUTION NO. 98-__ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING THE APPEAL BY REGENCY PROPERTIES OF FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 PARK/STREET LIGHTING TAX LEVIES AGAINST THE TEMECULA CREEK INN THE CITY OF TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On June 24, 1997, the Temecula City Council adopted Resolution No. 97- 72, establishing the amount of the special tax against properties within the City to pay for community services, parks and recreation, and arterial street lighting and medians for fiscal year 1997-98. Section 2. On December 2, 1997, Mr. Paul Reed fried an appeal of the special tax levied against the Temecula Creek Inn, known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 922-220-002, 922-220- 004, 922-220-007, 922-220-008, 922-230-002, 922-230-003, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, and 922-230-008 (Property) for fiscal year 1997-98. Section 3. On March 31, 1998, the City Council considered the appeal, at which time the owner of the Property and its representatives had an opportunity to testify on behalf of the appeal. Section 4. Based on the testimony, staff report, and other information presented to the Council, the Council hereby f'mds that: A. The Property, in whole or in part, is being used for a non-residential purpose, which is the purpose intended for its classification; B. The Property, and its employees, clients, customers and visitors, receive arterial street lighting and median services, community services, and parks and recreation services from the City of Temecula, and the Property's classification adequately reflects the service received; C. The special tax amounts levied on the Property adequately reflect the special tax amounts applicable to the Property if it were developed to its highest and best use; and D. There are no unique or special circumstances of the Property, or land use regulations affecting the Property, that support a further modification of the classification of the Property. E. Appeal was fried after the applicable appeal period. Section 5. The City Council grants a reduction in the special tax levied against the Property for fiscal year 1997-98 to $39,430.60 for 22.7 acres based upon information that the 22.7 acres are undevelopable due to slope and flood plain restrictions provided that Applicant R: \yaslnobk\agendas\temcrk98. apl provides City with a survey or other documentation verifying this area. The City Council hereby denies all other portions the appeal of the special tax levied against the property for fiscal year 1997-98. Section 6. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula is hereby authorized and directed to give notice of the Council's decision in writing to the owner of the Property within 15 days after the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 31 st day of March, 1998. ATrF. ST: Ron Roberts, Mayor Susan Jones, Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CAIJFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 98-__ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 31st day of March, 1998 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Susan Jones, Acting City Clerk R:\yaslnobk\agendas\temcrk98.apl APPEAL FORM (Fiscal Year 1997-98) CITY OF TEMECULA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (TCSD) PARKS/LIGHTING SERVICES SPECIAL TAX AND TCSD RATES AND CHARGES Differences over the City of Temecula Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax and the TCSD Rates and Charges received by property owners within the City of Temecula are handled thrcugh ~, administrativa appeal procedure. To fii~ an appeal, the property owner must complete the form on the back of this page and return it, by mail, to the TCSD, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033, or in person, at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, prior to 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1997. For telephone inquiries, please call (909) 694-6480. There are two types of appeals that can be filed: An Appeal of Classification or an Appeal for Hardship. 1. Appeal of Classification: This request asks for a review of the special tax and/or rates and charges as applied to the use or classification of the property. For example: A residential parcel is levied at a commercial rate or CC&R's and zoning restrict the development of the property. 2. Appeal for Hardship: This type of appeal is intended to supplement, but not replace, any tax assistance programs provided by the State or County for senior citizens, blind, or disabled persons. To qualify, you must be 62 years of age or older, blind or disabled, and own and occupy your residence. Your individual income cannot exceed $13,200 per year, or $24,000 per household. If the hardship appeal is granted, the levied tax and/or charges will be deferred to the next tax year. A lien against the property is recorded to protect the City's interest for the amount of the total levy. Interest is not accrued. If the property changes ownership, the deferred levy charges become due and payable directly to the City. An Appeal for Hardship must be filed on an annual basis. (please complete other side) R:\C\Forms\applform.97 Please print or type the following information: Name: Regency Properties, Lo P., dba Temecula Mailing Address: 533 Coast Property Address (ff different) Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 922-220-002; 922-220-004; 922-230-003; 922-230-004; 922-230-007; 922-230-008 C"~' Inn Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road, Temecula, 9222220-007; Date: 12-01-97 CA 92592 922-222-008; 922-230-002; Telephone Number(s) where you can be reached: (619) 454-9793, ext. 109 In order to expedite your Appeal Review, please indicate the type of appeal you are requesting and include the information indicated below as it applies to your property. You may also attach any additional information that you' feel is relevant to support your appeal. 1. Appeal of Classification: X Please mark "x" if applicable. Please include with your appeal: Appeal for Hardship: Copy of tax bill or notice of public hearing which indicates the levy amounts. Zoning infomarion and current use of the property. Copy of CC&R's if development restrictions are enforced. Copy of grant deed. Please mark "x" if applicable. Please include with your appeal: Copy of tax bill or notice of public hearing which indicates the levy amounts. Copy of grant deed. Proof of age (must be 62 years or older) OR proof of disability. Income verification ($13,200 per individual or $24,00 per household). PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE BASIS OF YOUR APPEAL: Please see letter dated December 1, 1997. R:\C\Forms\appfform.97 Please print or type the following information: Name: Regency Properties, L~P., dba Temecula Mailing Address: 533 Coast Property Address (if different) Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road, Temecula, Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 922-220-002~ 922-220-004; 922-230-003; 922-230-004; 922-230-007; 922-230-008 Date: 12-01-97 CA 92592 9222220-007; 922-222-008~ 922-230-002; Telephone Number(s) where you can be reached: (619) 454-9793, ~xt. 109 In order to expedite your Appeal Review, please indicate the type of appeal you are requesting and include the information indicated below as it applies to your property. You may also attach any additional information that you' feel is relevant to support your appeal. 1. Appeal of Classification: X Please mark "x" ff applicable. Please include with your appeal: Appeal for Hardship: a. Copy of tax bill or notice of public hearing which indicates the levy amounts. b. Zoning information and current use of the property. c. Copy of CC&R's if development restrictions are enforced. d. Copy of grant deed. Please mark "x" if applicable. Please include with your appeal: Copy of tax bill or notice of public hearing which indicates the levy amounts. Copy of grant deed. Proof of age (must be 62 years or older) OR proof of disability. Income verification ($13,200 per individual or $24,00 per household). PLEASE SUMMARIZE THE BASIS OF YOUR APPEAL: Please see letter dated December 1, 1997. Signed: R:\C\Forn~ xapplform. 97 HAND-DELIVERED December 1, 1997 Temecula Community Services District P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Ronald Bradley, City Manager Re: TCSD Rates and Charges Temecula Creek Inn and Golf Course Dear Mr. Bradley: We are writing to submit a claim under the Government Claims Act, commencing with Section 940 of the California Government Code, and, in the alternative, under Section 5097 of the Code of Revenue and Taxation, for a refund of all fees and charges paid to the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD" or "District") on account of the Temecula Creek Inn Golf Course (the "Property") for fiscal years 1996-97 and 1997-98.z/ According to the TCSD, the charges levied against the Property fall into two categories, Community Services, Parks and Recreation, and "Service Level A", consisting of "arterial street lighting and median maintenance." According to the TCSD, each property within the District is assigned an Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") factor reflecting the property's land use and degree of benefit from the service being provided. The TCSD service charge is then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor for the property times the number of acres for the property times a charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to budgeted expenditures. Prior to the 1996-97 fiscal year, the Property was assigned an EDU factor of 0.5, a factor assigned to property utilized for "agricultural" uses. Although the Property has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course, the "agricultural" designation was appropriate among the TCSD's other land use designations. As a golf course, the Property provides a significant amount of open space and recreation for the community's benefit -- the very object served by the TCSD fee -- in contrast with developed or vacant residential or commercial property. The TCSD charge was then calculated by multiplying the EDU factor of 0.5 times the number of acres for the Property times the charge per EDU set by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. t. The Property consists ofthefollowing Assessor's ParceiNumbers: 922-220-002, 922-220-004,922-220-007,922-222-008,922-230-002, 922°230-003, 922-230-004, 922-230-007, 922-230-008. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District December 1, 1997 Page 2 The TCSD revised the EDU factor for the Property for the fiscal year 1996-97 from 0.5 EDU to 2 EDU, effectively quadrupling the fees and charges levied against the Property, although there had been no change in the land use of the Property and no change in the level of any benefits being provided to the Property. For the fiscal year 1997-98, the charges are the same. In our letter dated November 27, 1996, the 1996-97 levies were appealed and the appeal was only partially granted. Regency raises two objections to the TCSD rates. First, there is no rational relationship between the charges which have been levied against the Property and any benefit enjoyed by the Property. As noted, the TCSD calculates charges for services provided by the District by multiplying an assigned EDU factor times the acreage of the parcel times the charge per EDU established by the TCSD according to each fiscal year's budget. The District's system for allocating charges for District expenditures, however, erroneously assumes that there is some relationship between the services provided by such expenditures and a parcel's land use designation. In addition, the comparative weighting of a golf course in relation to a commercial property is too high, e.g., 2/6 or 1/3 versus the prior weighting of .5/6 or 1/12. In addition, there is no adjustment for the benefit that a golf course provides to the community. We fully support the TCSD's goal of providing parks and recreation facilities to the City of Temecula and believe the Temecula Creek Inn makes a significant contribution to that end. At the same time, we benefit no more from a new roller hockey and skateboard facility, a project funded with TCSD charges, than the average homeowner, yet we are being asked to fund a much greater share of the cost. For instance, for the 1996-97 fiscal year, the average homeowner paid a charge to the TCSD for such facilities based upon an EDU factor of one multiplied by the number of units on the parcel, one times the charge per EDU, or $69.25. For the golf course, a parcel benefitting no more or less from recreation facilities than anyone else, Regency must pay its proposed EDU factor of 2, times the number of acres of the Property, or, 298.04 acres, times the charge per EDU of $69.25, for a total of $41,272.62. Indeed, it is ironic that Regency is essentially being penalized for owning property with a relatively high number of acres -- a factor given tremendous weight by the District's formula for calculating charges for parks and recreation facilities -- when the Property is being utilized as a park and recreation facility and as open space. There is simply no rational basis for insisting that the Property, itself a park and recreation facility, pay nearly 600 times the amount of the average homeowner for parks and recreation facilities of general benefit to the community. The reason for this obvious anomaly is clear: the District's EDU-based formula simply does not fit its intended purpose. The EDU-based formula may be a rational basis for allocating charges where the cost of providing a service to a parcel may be measured by the parcel's density of use, such as the need for water or sewer service. The larger the parcel, the more intense the use, the greater the demand on a city's, county's or special district's ability to provide such service. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District December 1, 1997 Page 3 Here, however, the Property places no strain on the District's ability to provide parks and recreation facilities, has created no need for such facilities and benefits no more from such facilities than the average homeowner. If anything, the Property should be exempt from any charge for parks and recreation facilities because it is such a facility, although it receives no funds from the District. The size of the Property -- a heavily weighted factor in the District's formula --has little, if anything, to do with the volume of use of the golf course, standing alone or as compared to other commercial property. A commercial bank sitting on one acre would undoubtedly enjoy a far greater financial benefit from the attraction of residents to the community than a golf course, yet the golf course, because it has set aside nearly 300 acres for recreation and open space, is being asked to pay one hundred times the amount of a bank for recreation facilities under the District's formula. Set forth below is a hypothetical comparing a shopping center to a golf course. Shopping Center Golf Course Land necessary for the Operation Purchase Price Number of Clients Number of Employees Gross Income Property Tax Assessment for Use of the Parks 20 acres 300 acres $12 million $12 million Tens of Thousands Thousands 250 75 $3 million $3 million $120,000 $120,000 10,000 40,000 The only reason the golf course is required to pay a higher assessment is because it is located on 300 acres of land. It certainly cannot be construed as having a greater impact upon the community than the shopping center. The bottom line is that there is no rational relationship between the intangible and indirect benefit of parks and recreation facilities and the density of use or size of a parcel. The District is comparing apples to oranges. Rather, the cost of general government programs and facilities can and should be borne by the entire community in a fair and equitable manner, and not be weighted against commercial properties and developers because it is politically expedient to do SO. To illustrate how burdensome the TCSD is as it applies to the Property, we attempted to research other similar maintenance districts in Southern California to determine their methodology for making assessments. We found that most of the districts cover the cost of parks out of their general fund and not through maintenance districts. However, we found another maintenance district in Rancho Bernardo called the Rancho Bernardo Landscape Maintenance District ("RBLMD") which is administered by the City of San Diego, which provides median and roadway landscaping maintenance in certain areas of Rancho Bernardo. In apportioning their assessment, the City considers more than simply land use designation. The KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92.037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District December 1, 1997 Page 4 City consider three factors: (1) a land use factor; (2) a benefit factor; and (3) a location factor. The City then weighs all these elements and multiplies them to calculate the assessment for each property. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a summary the apportionment methodology utilized in the RBLMD. Upon reviewing Exhibit "A," you will note that the City of San Diego breaks down land use designations in far more detail and correlates their weighting to trip generations. In order to give a sense of the weighting difference, I have set forth below a comparison between the land use weighting of the TCSD and the RBLMD: Category of Use TCSD Factor RBLMD Factor Single Family Residential MuFti-Family Residential Singe Family Vacant Non-Residential Vacant Commercial Office/Retail Golf Course 1 per unit 0.75 per unit 2 per acre 4 per acre 6 per acre 2 per acre 1 per unit 0.7 per unit no comparable designation no comparable designation 31.5 per acre 0.8 per acre You will note that the weighting of the TCSD is 2.5 times greater than that of the RBLMD. In addition, under the TCSD methodology, the weighting is based only upon land use. There is no attempt to assess a benefit factor. Under the RBLMD, the land use factor is then adjusted by a benefit factor. In this case, the benefit factor is 0.2, which makes the net weighting of the golf course O. 16 (0.2 x 0.8 = O. 16). As a result, the true weighting of a golf course under the RBLMD is 12.5 less than the weighting under the TCSD (2 ~- 0.16 = 12.5). In its explanation in the attached Exhibit "A." the Engineer's Report notes as follows: "Lands in the Golf Course Park categories are considered to receive no significant benefit from the aesthetic elements of District improvements, as the aesthetic values of these lands are themselves so high that they are little enhanced by those of other lands in their vicinity." In another words, under the RBLMD scheme, they take into consideration the benefit provided by the golf course to the community and correspondingly reduce the level of assessment accordingly. It is interesting to note that the City previously had the weighting of a golf course right when it assessed the Property at 0.5 EDU per acre. Coincidentally, this happens to be 1/12 of the assessment of commercial property (0.5 -: 6 = 1/12). Secondly, even if one assumes that the District can utilize its EDU based formula for calculating charges for parks and recreational facilities, there is no rational basis on the record for the District's increase in the EDU factor or the Property from 0.5 to 2 EDU for the fiscal years 1996-97 and 1997-98. The TCSD's stated reason for this revision is that: (1) the TCSD no longer utilizes the County of Riverside's land use designations in its formula for calculating charges, but, in that year, in order to utilizes the City of Temecula's recently adopted Development Code and Zoning Map; (2) although the Property was listed as agricultural property under the District's formula, a land use designation which exists under the County of Riverside's zoning map, the City of Temecula has no such designation in its Development Code, and (3) a golf course, such as the Property, is now being categorized as an "outdoor KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District December 1, 1997 Page 5 commercial recreational use" under Section 17.14.020 of the Development Code "and is not classified as agricultural property." With that in mind, the District arbitrarily increased the levy on golf courses such as the Property to 2 EDU per acre, rather than the 0.5 EDU per acre, premised on the basis that the TCSD cannot ignore the fact that the golf course improvements are utilized for commercial purposes." See Memo of David W. Hogan, Senior Planner, to Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director, dated September 19, 1996. Why are parks and recreation facilities and open space, such as the golf course, now being levied at 2 EDU instead of 0.5 EDU? Whether the Property is characterized as an "agricultural" use, "open space" or a "parks and recreation" facility, the bottom line is that it has been, and continues to be, utilized as a golf course. There has been no change in the level of service or benefit provided to the Property by the District and no change in the land use of the Property which could possibly justify a fee increase. The District simply gave the Property a new label and arbitrarily quadrupled the levy. With respect to the fiscal year 1997-98, the current governing ordinance is Ordinance 96-21. Under that ordinance, in Section 2, there is a specific reference to a cap on per acre charge for agricultural uses which is half of the single family charge or 0.5 EDU. Therefore, for purposes of the TCSD, golf courses should be weighted the same as agricultural land and taxed at a rate of 0.5 EDU per acre. Nor is it any answer that the Property is being utilized for a "commercial purpose." Agricultural property is utilized for a commercial purpose. The golf course has been utilized as a commercial recreation facility for years. Although a commercial facility, the District has levied the Property at 0.5 EDU per acre because, whatever label is attached, the Property has been and continues to be utilized as open space and as a parks and recreation facility, which justifies a levy at a lower rate given the attendant benefits of such a facility. In addition, 41 acres of the Property is not developed as a golf course at this time. Furthermore, 22.7 acres of the Property cannot be developed due to slope and flood plain restrictions. At the very minimum, this portion of the Property should not be assessed. In sum, there is nothing in the record to support the District's current charges. They are not rationally related to the benefits received by the Property as illustrated by allocations made by the RBLMD. We respectfully request that the City re-evaluate its allocation of levies in light of the information we have provided. I suggest that the City consider an allocation weighting of 0.5 EDU per acre to the Property, especially given the Property's and other golf courses contribution to the community supply of parks and recreation facilities and its utilization as open space. We would be happy to meet with the District to discuss the issues raised by this letter and it is our intent to work with the District to resolve this matter in an amicable fashion. The District's current proposed levy, however, in addition to being unsupported by the record and inequitable, threatens to place a severe hardship and strain on the Property's ability to continue to operate and must be addressed. KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA $2037 (619) 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Temecula Community Services District December 1, 1997 Page 6 We understand that Karl F. Lindeman has requested that members of the C.S.D. and City Council reconsider the matter and review the relative weighting of the assessment placed on golf courses under the TCSD versus other land uses. We think a fresh look at the matter is warranted. Executive Vice President Enclosures KSC MANAGEMENT, INC. 533 Coast Boulevard South, La Jolla, CA 92037 {619} 454-9793 FAX (619) 459-6758 Exhibit "A" ~'~an Dicoto Apportionment Methodology The total cost for maintenance of the improvements funded by thc District will be assessed to the various parcels in proportion to the estimated Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) assigned a parcel in relationship to the total EBUs of all the parcels in the District, EBUs for each parcel have been determined as a timetlon of three thctors. a Land Use Factor, a Benefit Factor, and a Location Factor. rotated a~ :~h~v,n iu the following equa'tiol~: [ EOtJs = l. ano use Factor x I:ten~tlt Factor x Loca~i_o.?'~actor Each oI' these iactors are discussed below. Land Use Factor Since the improvements to be maintained by the District are primarily associated with the Transportation Element of the General and Community Plans, trip l~eneration rates for various land use categories (as previously established by the City's Transportation Planning Section) have been used as the primarT basis for the development of Land Use Factors. While these trip generation rates strictly address only vehicular trips, they are also considered to approximately reflect relative trip generation for other modes of' transportation (e.g.. pedestrian trips, bicycle trips. etc.), and are considered the best available information liar these other trartsponation modes. The special benefits of landscape. improvements maintained by the District are linked to trip generation primarily by the public safety ~d a~thctic enhancement enjoyed by ;ravelors through the community. Trip generation rates provide the required nexus and basis for assigning ratios of maximum potential benefit to the various land use/zoning classifications as defined by the Municipal Code. Land use/zoning classifications have been grouped with averaged trip generation rates assigned to establish the Land Use Factors as shown in Table 1. TABLE 1; Land Use Fa;tors Land Use/'Z0'n~n= L Code m [ L_a.n_d_Use Factor Residential - Detached S;D 1.0 per dwelling unit Sinlie Family Residential - Condomini'urn '- CND 0.7 per dwelling un'i~ Residential. Apartment AP'~' 0.? per dwelling unit Residmtial .Duplex DUP- !.4 per parcel : Residential - Mobile Hom~s' -MOLD 0,5 per dwelling unit' Residential - Conval~scem & CNV 0,3 per dwelling unit Retirement Home ^gricultutal AGR 00~ per Commercial. Office & Retail COM 45,0 per acre ' t::ducational - Primer7 & EPS 5.0 per acre Secondary. Fire/Police Station FPS I~.0 per acre Golf Course GLI~" 08 per acre Hot;i- HTL '' '~:0 per n<~re , House of Wo~'ship CRH -~,8 per acre Industrial IND 1 $.0 per acre Library LI]~ ,~0.0 per acre ODen SI)ace (designated) OSP 0 per acre Park - Developed PKD 5.0 per acre Pos~ Office PST 15.0 per acre Recreational Facility REC 3.0 pet acre Street/Roadway $TR 0 per acre Utili~ Facility UTL 3,0 per acre As applicable, ~he land use codes above may be preceded by a "D" (for developed) or a "U" {for undeveloped~ in t~e ^ssessmcn! Ke[I for this District Designated Open Space serves primarily to preserve natural landscape and habitat. While access for stud~ and passive recreation is sometimes penniRed, ~he.~e activitie; are u.~ua]ly allowed only to ~he limited extent consistent with the primary pm'po~e uf t~utural pr~:~e. rvul. iun. Sine;t: thi~ lurid i~ e~scntially District "unused" in the customary terms of land use (which relate to human use, not use by nature), the trip generation rate is zero. therefore, the designated Open Space receives no benefit from the Transportation Element and has been assigned a Land Use Factor of'zero. The Recreational Facility category includes those which consist primarily of concentrated facilities, such as swimming l~0ois. gymnasiums, racquetball clubs. etc. Recreational facilities of a more dispersed nature (e.g., golf courses, parks, etc.) have been categorized separately. While those traveling streets mad roadways enjoy the improvements maintained by the District during their travel, the actual benefit of this enjoyment accrues to the lands at the origins and destinations of their trips, not to the lands of the streets and roadways, themselves. Accordingly, the $treets/T, oadways category receive no benefit and have been assigned a Land Use Factor of zero. The Utility Facility category applies to utili¢' infrastructure facilities, such as water tanks, pump stations, electric p~we~ transformer siations, etc. Utility company administrative offices are not included in this categoD'. Benefit Factor The Land Use Factor described above reflects the relative intensity of use (or potential use) of the various parcels of land to bc assessed. It does not address the relationship of thi:~ use to the Sl~Cific improvements to be maintained by the District. This relationship is reflected in the Benefit Factor utilized in the assessmere methodology, In determining the l;tenefit Factor for each land use category, the subcomponents of the benefits of District improvements considered may include some or all of the following: public safety, view corridors and aesthetics, e~ancement of community identity, drainage coredors, and recreational potentiaL. As Benefit Factors and their subcomponcnt~ are intended to rcfiect the particular relationships betv,'een specific land uses within a district and the specific improvements maintained by the district, Benefit Factors will generally vary from one d~stnc! to another, based on th~ specific character and nature of the applicable land uses and improvements maintained. The applicable benefit subcomponents and resultant composite Benefit Factors determined for the various Land Use/Zoning categories within this District are as slyown in Table 2. TABLE 2: Benefit Factore by Lend Use Publle Safer7 Aesthetics ]~ene~t lraator , Land Es~Zonlng (m~ 0.4) (max, 0,6) (ma~ 1.0) Residential - All 0.4 0.6 1,0 A~rlcol~r~i 0.4 0 0.4 Comme~i~ - O~ce & Retail 0.4 0,3 0.7 Educational - Prim~, and S~conda~ 0.4 0,3 0.7 Firei~e S~tion .... 0.4 0,3 0,7 Gall Cnur~e 0.~ 0 0.2 ~Ote] 0,4 0.3 0.7 House of ~orship O.a 0.3 0.7 Indu~n'ial 0.4 0.3 0,7 open' Sp~ce (&~ign~ted) 0,4 ': 0 0,4 Park - Developed 0.4 0 0.4 Post Of~ee 0.4 0.3 0.? Recreational Faciti~ 0.4 0,3 0.~ S~ee~oadway 0.4 0 04 Udlity F~cllky 0.4 0 O,a Public $aJ'ety. All !and uses are considered to receive the maximum available benefit from the public safety element of District improvements. Public ssfety is essential to all land uses? and even to lands, such as designated Open Space, held in stewardship with only incidental human use. Re ,l Maintenance Ae,thetics. The destee of benefit received from the aesthetic qualities of landscaped and harriscaped roadway medians and rights-ot;way maintained by the District varies among land ~e categories. Generally, by nature of their use, residential lands receive the greates~ benefit from the reduced traffic congestion. reduced noise levels, greater' sepat'ation fi'o,~ tjulTi~: ',~M lt~n~rally more tranquil environment provided by landscaped and harriscaped roadway medians and rights-of-way. Commercial and institutional uses, on the other hand. often thrive on higher densities. greater traffic access, and a higher level of activity in the vicinity of their enterprises, These uses, accordingly, receive a lesser degree of benefit from the general insulation and se~)aration provided by the aesthetic elements of District improvements. Lands in the Agricultural, Open Space, Street/Roadway, and Utility Facility. catcgorics arc considcred to r~c¢ive no significant benefit from the aesthetic elements of District improvements. as enhanced aesthetic quality of other lands in their vici.airy does no~ affect their function. use. or value. Lands in the Golf Course and Park categories are considered to receive no significant benefit from the aesthetic elements of District improvemct~ts. as the aesthetic values of these lands are ~hemselves so high that they are little e~anced by those of other lands in their vicinity. Location Factor The Location Factor considers the location of ~he properties to be assessed relative to the location of District improvements. The District has been sub-divided into (wo zones. Each zone has been assigned a unique Location Factor. The zones are as follows: Zon~ I - This zone encompasses the entire District with the exception of the Bernardo Heights ar~a (Zone 2). District improvements are generally evenly situated throughout Zone !. As such, those parcels located within Zone 1 have been assigned a Location Factor of one, Zoll¢ 2 - '[his zone encompasses the Bernardo Heigtats portion of the District and contains almost exclusively resider~tial properties. Zone 2 contains private improvements of like character and nature aintenance Dialect : to those found throughout the District. However, the improvements located within Zone 2 are privately owned and maintained by the residents through an agreement wittt the City. As such, parcels within Zone 2 have been assigned a Location Factor of zero. Table 3 summarizes the proposed Location Factors for the two zones within the District. TABLE 3: Location Factors by Zone Zone [ Location FaCtor Zone ! 1.0 Zone 2 0 Equivalent Benefit Units (EBUs) As described above. the number of Equivalent Benefit Units (EDU~) attributable :o each parcel it~ th~ Dietrivet h~ bc~n calculated. based on the preceding factors, as follows Land Use Factor x Benefit ;actor x Location Factor Based on the above formula, the EBU$ calculated for each property, can be found in the Assessment Roll (Exhibit B). ~ty86.11 ACRES M/L IN POR SEC 19 TBS R2W DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS ess 44051 RAINBOW CANYON RD TEMECULA 92592 JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA CA 92037 RIVERSIDE COUN'I. SECURED PROPERTY TAX BILL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 FOR TOTAL H. WAYNE WAI TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR Courtly A. dm~ntshative Cartier 4080 Lemon St - 4th ¢k)or. Riverside, Calitornla (P.O Box 12005, Riverside. CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 0394548 Tax Rale Area PaRel Number 013-004 922220002-1 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE , TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 EMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV [TROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 ,STERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV ~909) 925-7676 kNCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV ~_. (909) 676-4101 D CNTL STORMWA'fER/CLEANWATEF~ (909) 275-1200 iMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, (.~ (909) 694-6480 ~NCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE L~ (909) 676-4101 ND STANDBY EAST ~ (800) 528-2710 IWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, @ (909) 925-7676 26000.00 2914.86 881.40 858.00 7500.00 34.44 12303.40 3444.40 597.60 576.94 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS RECEIPTS WiLL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February I. 1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT $27,555.52 PAY THIS AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE April 10, 1998 (See item #6 on reverse) Due November 1, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $27,555,52 PAY THIS A~UNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 $27,555.52 $27,555.52 Add 10% 1 penally nlter 12110/97 527,555.52 SEND O~L_Y THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $2 , 755 . 54 attar April 10. 1998 (Ibis is a 10% penalty plus $10 cosl; 1or addallodial charges, see items 5 and 6 on reverse) ~SE~ME~NUMBER 922220002-1 BiLL NUMBER 0394548 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STU~ 2ND INSTALLMENT (CANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID) % 00002755552 0297 0394548 01 /, o' .- :,,;;,;~? ' /"" ,* SEND ~N_L~ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 1 sl INSTALL~EN f pAyMEHT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ 2 , 755 . 54 a~Im December 10, ! 997 (Thts is a 10% penaily; tot addilional charges, see I~ems 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ~SE~MENTNUMBER 922220002-1 B~L NUMBER 0394548 1 ST INSTALLMENT 00002755552 0197 0394548 01 0119970394548000027555521210199700003031106237 RIVERSIDE COUN'I . SECURED PROPERTY' TAX BILL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 ~ty 5.75 ACRES M/L IN POR SEC 19 TBS R2W ~ DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS ss 44501 RAINBOW CANYON RD TEMECULA 92592 r. JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 COAST BLV S LA JOLLA CA 92037 FOR TOTAL R, WAYNE WAI IS TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR County A~lrninistrelive Center 4080 Lemon Sl. - 4lb FIoo~, Riverside, California {P.O Box 12005, Riverside, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 0 3 9 4 5 4 9 .;9 Z ~'~'~U~J.,~.',-11~' Tax Rale Area Pamel Number 013-004 922220003-2 O 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 5MENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV TROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 STERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV J909) 925-7676 NCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV (&~ {909) 676-4101 2) CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATEF~ {9091 275-1200 MECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, ~ (909) 694-6480 NCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE ~) (909) 6764101 %'0 STANDBY EAST (~ (800) 528-2710 IWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, (~ (909) 925-7676 25870 O0 2900 28 876 99 853 71 1746 64 166 06 2464 68 230 O0 39 90 66 70 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS RECEtP7 S WiLL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February 1, 1998 SECOND !NSTAL. LMENT $17,607:48 PAY ml$ AMOUNT ~ O. BEFORE April 10, 1908 (See item #6 on reverse) $17,607.48 Add 10% 1 penalty erie! 12/10/97 $17,607.48 SEND Q~LY_ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 770.72 slier April 10, 199~ (Th~s *S a 10% penally plus $10 COSI: Io[ add~honal chalges, sea lieres $ sr, d 6 on ~everse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $17,607.48 Add 10% penalty plus 2 4/~0/98 $17,607.48 ~SE~MENT NUMBER 922220003-2 ~tt NUM~ 0394549 2ND INSTAllMENT {CANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PND) 00001760748 0297 0594549 01 0219970394549000017607480410199800001937820246 Due November I, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $17,607.48 PAY 11419 AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 SEND Q_NL_Y_ THIS STUB WITH YOUR Is! INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 760 . 72 allel' Decembe! IO, 1997 {This IS a 10% penarty', for additional charges, see ilems 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB A$SE~MENT NUMBER 922220003-2 BI~ NUMBER 0394549 I ST INSTAllMENT 00001760748 0197 0394549 01 0119970394549000017607481210199700001936820230 ~e,ly 52.81 ACRES IN POR LOTS 27 & 28 BLK v~,. JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP RIVERSIDE COUk ,' SECURED PROPERTY TAX BIL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 REGENCY PROP LP C/0 THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 % TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV dETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV _(800) 225-5693 :IANCHO CAL Wq'R R DIV DEBT SV (~D (909) 676-4101 :LD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER~ {909/ 275-1200 FEMECULA PARKS;LIGHTING SVS. (.~ (909) 694-6480 RANCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE c(~ (909) 676-4101 VIWD STANDBY EAST (~. (800) 528-2710 EMWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, (~ (909) 925-7676 1 MB 011/507 19400.00 2174.93 1848.88 5790.00 21.12 7545.50 2087.20 362.12 348.54 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR HECORDS RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February 1.1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT $19,788.14 PAY ml$ AMOUNT ~ On BEFORE April 10, 1998 ' (See ilem #6 on reverse) $19,788.14 Add 10% 1 pena.qy a~ter 12r10,'97 $19,788.14 SEND ONLY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 988. 79 aJler April I0, '1998 (This is S 10'% penally p~us $10 COSl; Ior additional charges, see ~tems 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR (P.O. Box 12005. Riveraida, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 aiTI Number AS~I~.. 2 NIJ~_ ~' 013-008 922220004-3 0 09/25/1D97 IMPORTAN'r INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE te~ 1,9:30 ,'00 O! smucrun~s ...... 3. o, o~0 o TREES S ~ES: ~?~L: :~'~' $19,788.14 ~d lO% penaRy plus 2 $ ~0 c~ $19,788.14 ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922220004-3 BILL HUMBER 0394550 2ND INSTALLMENT (CANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT I$ P/dO) 00001978814 0297 0394550 01 0219970394550000019788140410199800002177693248 Due November 1, 1997 FIRST INSTALLblENT $19,788.14 PAY THIS ~t&fOUNr ON OR BEFORE December 10, lgg7 SEND ONLY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 1st INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 9 7 8 . 7 9 alle¢ oecember Io. lggZ (This is a 10% penalty; Ior addllional charges, see ilsres 5 end 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB 00001978814 0197 0394550 01 ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922220004-3 B~ NUMBER 0394550 I ST INSTALLMENT 0119970394550000019788141210199700002176693233 RIVERSIDE COUld, ' SECURED PROPERTY TAX BIL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 ~edy 14.36 ACRES M/L IN POR LOT 26 BLK 1 MB 011/507 SD ~la PAUBA LAND & WATER CO SUB ~,. JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 Bill Number 039455 ~ 0~3-008 922220007-6 O 09/25/Z997 IMPORTAN r INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV IETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 ANCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV t~ (909) 676-4101 LD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER~ (909) 275-1200 EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, ~ (909) 694-6480 ANCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE (~- ~909) 676-4101 IWD STANDBY EAST (~ {800} 528-2710 MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, @ (909) 925-7676 5989.58 671.49 570.20 1796.86 5.74 2051.76 574.40 99.66 94.78 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS JO RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED .- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due Februaly 1, 1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT $5,927.23 PaY 'P~IS AMOUI~ ON OR BEFORE Apd110, 1998 (See item #6 on reverse) $5,927.23 Add IO% 1 penally allel' $5,927.23 SEND QNJ,.Y_ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $602 . 69 alter April I0. ~998 (This iS & 10% penalty plus $10 cost; Ior addihonal cha~ges, see items 5 and G on revefse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $5,927.23 Add10% pena~y plu~ 2 $100~ e~er $5,927.23I ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922220007-6 BILL NUMBER 0394551 2ND IN~rAI I MENT 10ANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID) 00000592723 0297 0394551 01 0219970394551000005927230410199800000652992249 Due Novembe~ 1. 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $5,927.23 PAY THIS AMOUNT OH ,OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 SEND ONL'~ THIS STUB WITH YOUR lsl INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ 592 . 69 a.er December I0, 1997 (This is a 10% penally, for add)lionel charges, see items 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922220007-6 BiLL NUMBER 0394551 I ST IN~TAI I MENT 00000592723 0197 0394551 01 0119970394551000005927231210199700000651992234 :erh, 3.99 ACRES ~ta PAUBA LAND Tess ~r. JANUARY 1, RIVERSIDE COUN, ~' SECURED PROPERTY TAX BIE. For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 Ihrough June 30, 1998 IN POR LOTS 25 & 26 BLK 1 MB Oll/507 SD & WATER CO SUB 1997 REGENCY PROP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 LP R. WAYNE WAI']~ TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR (PO. Box 12005, Riverside, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 Bill Number ~ .t~SM~,NT NI, J~t~i Tax Rale Area Parce~ Number 013-002 922220(]08-7 O 09/25/1997 IMPORTAN r INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE % TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 1660.91 LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV 1 86 · 20 LB CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER~ (909) 275-1200 1 9 1. 5 2 EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, (~ (909) 694-6480 5 70. 1 0 MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, @ (909) 925-7676 2 6. 3 2 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS ¢0 RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February 1, 1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT :~,t 81,31.?,.52 t" PAY ~IS ~UNr ON OR BEFO~ Apdi 10, 1998 (See item ~6 o~ reverse) $1,317.52 Add 10% 1 psna~y dim 12! 10/97 $1,317.52 SEND QNL~Y THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $141 . 73 aJtef April IO. 1996 (This is a 10% penally p/us $10 cost, for additional charges, see ilsres 5 at~J 6 on reverse} PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $1,317.52 Add lo% pen~y plus 2 $10 c~ ~10~8 $1,317.52I ~SE SSMENT NU~ER 922210008-7 BILL NUMBER 0394552 2ND INSTALLMENT (CANf'~OT BE PAID UNLESS FIRS1. INSTALLMENT IS PAID) 00000131752 0297 0394552 01 0219970394552000001317520410199800000145925242 Due November I, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $1,317.52 PAY THIS AMO4JNT ~ ~ BEFORE December 10, 1997 SEND _O~NtY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 1st INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $131 . 73 ella, Dec~.~r Io. 1997 (This is a 10% penalty; lOT addillonal charges. see items 5 and 6 on reverse} PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922220008-7 BIll NUMEIER 0394552 I ST IN BTAU. MENT 00000131752 0197 0394552 01 0119970394552000001317521210199700000144925236 :,t - ~i~.~> RIVERSIDE COUN. SECURED PROPERTY TAX BILL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 ~rty 59.29 ACRES M/L IN POR SEC 19 TBS R2W FOR TOTAL 'a DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS :r. JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA CA 92037 00122632 TREASURER 'TAX COLLECTOR 4080 Lemon St - 4th Floor. Riverside. Calilornia Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 Sill f~Jmb~r 013-004 922230002-2 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 .EMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV ETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 ~.STERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV ~909) 925-7676 ~,NCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV L~.~ (909) 676-4101 D CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATEF~ (909) 275-1200 -:MECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS. ~" (909} 694-6480 ~.NCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE (~ (909) 676-4101 WD STANDBY EAST ~ (800) 528-2710 ,/IWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, ~ (909) 925-7676 I 9o%" %936J 17052.58 1911.76 578.08 562.73 5115.76 23.72 8471.36 2371.60 411.46 391.30 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS 0 RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February $, ! 998 SECOND INSTALLMENT . $18,445.. 18 PAY ~HIS AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE April 10, 1998 (See item #6 on reverse) $18,445.18 Add 10% 1 penalty alle~ $18,445.18 SEND ONLY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2nd INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 854 · 48 aJte~' AI~1110, 1998 (This .S a 10°o ~e.aalty plus $10 cosL Io~ additional charges, see lieres 5 and 6 on reverse} PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $18,445.18 Add ! 0% penaly plus 2 $10 Oosl a#e~ 4! I O/g8 $18,445.18 ASSESSMENT NUMBER 922230002-2 BILL NUMBER 0394559 2ND INSTAU.MENT (CANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID) 00001844518 0297 0394559 01 0219970394559000018445160410199800002029966243 Due November 1, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $18,445,18 PaY THIS AMOUH! ON OR BEFORE December 10, Ig97 SEND QN_LY_ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 1st INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $1 , 8 ~ 4 . 48 aNer December 1 O, 1997 {This is a 18% pena~ly; Ior additional charges, see ilems 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ASSESSMENT NU~ER 922230002-2 BILL NUMBER 0394559 I iHSZu. MENT 00001844518 0197 0394559 01 0119970394559000018445181210199700002028966237 1.00 ACRES H/L DESCRIPTION SEE JANUARY 1, 1997 RIVERSIDE COUN ,' SECURED PROPERTY TAX For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 IN POR SEC 19 TBS R2W FOR TOTAL ASSESSORS MAPS REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 00122633 R. WAYtIE WAI TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR (P O Bo~ 12005, Riverasis, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 Bill Number 0394560 '~9=~2 Ta~ Rale Area Pam~ Num~ 013-004 922230003-3 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE j % TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 200.00 !LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT $V 22.42 4ETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 6.7 8 !ASTERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV _(909) 925-7676 6.60 {ANCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV ~ (909) 676-4101 60.00 'EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, (~ ~909) 694-6480 1 4 2.8 8 4WD STANDBY EAST (~ (800) 528-2710 6.94 !MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, (~ (909) 925-7676 6.60 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS NO RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due February I. 1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT, ~ .:: ' ~'~.-~ ~i~ '~ $226.11 . ::i~ PaY THIS AMOUNT 014 OR ~ Ap~110, 1998 (See item ~6 on reverse) $226.11 Add 10% ! penally allel 12/10/97 SEND ONLY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2nd INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $32.60 eJ~erAp~,m, ;~ge (Th,s iS a 10% penally p~us $10 cost lot addihonal cha~ges, see ilsres 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $226.11 Add 10% perially plus 2 St0 Co~ aJte~ 4/;0/96 $226.11 ~SE~MENT NUMBER 922230003-3 BILL NUMBER 0394560 2ND INS~'ALLME NT (CANNOT BE PASO UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT [$ PAID) 00000022611 0297 0394560 01 0219970394560000000226110410199800000025871247 Due November 1. 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $226.11 PAY 11115 AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 SENO ONLY THIS STUB WIIH YOUR Ist INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ 22 . 60 aNer Decembe~ 10. 1997 {This is a 10% penally; for additicnsl charges, see ilsres $ and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB 00000022611 0197 0394560 01 ~$E~MENT NUMBER 922230003-3 BILL NUMBER 0394560 I IN~S~_LT MENT 0119970394560000000226111210199700000024871232 RIVERSIDE COUN.. SECURED PROPERTY TAX BIL For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997' through June 30, 1998 ,erl¥40.00 ACRES M/L IN POR SEC 19 T8S R2W FOR TOTAL da DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS 1997 REGENCY PROP LP tess e,. JANUARY 1, 0012263¢ REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 4080 Lemon SI. - 4lb Floo~, Riverside, Caldorroe (PO Box 12005, Riverside, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 0394561 ~:. , :~3,~ 013-004 922230004-4 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE '~% TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV I/TROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 ASTERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV (909) 925-7676 ANCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV ~ (909) 676-410! EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, (~ (909) 694-6480 IWD STANDBY EAST (~ (800) 528-2710 MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, (~ (909) 925-7676 900726937 8000.00 896.88 271.20 264.00 2400.00 5715.20 277.60 164.00 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUEO -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Due Feb~uaw 1. 199B SECOND INSTALLMENT $8,994.44 ' PAY 11'119, ,~3,AOUNT ON OR BEFORE April 10, 1998 (See item #6 on reverse) $8,994.44 $8,994.44 SEND _ONL_Y_ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2nd INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $909.44 aftel'April 10, 1998 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB $8,994.44 Add 10% penally plus2 $10 eos~ after 4/10/98 $8,994.44 · ~SSESSMENT NUMBER 922230004-4 BILL NUMBER 0394561 2ND INSTALLMENT (CANNOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENf IS PAIO} 00000899444 0297 0394561 01 0219970394561000008994440410199800000990388249 Due Novembel l, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $8,994.44 PAY THIS AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997. SEND O~NL~ THIS STUB WITH YOUR 1 st INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ S 9 9 . 4 4 a#e~ Oecemb~r 10, 1997 (This is a 10% penally; for additional charges, see ilems 5 and 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ASSE~MENT NUMBER 922230004-4 Bl~ NUMBER 0394561 I ST INSTAllMENT 00000899444 0197 0394561 01 0119970394561000008994441210199700000989388237 RIVERSIDE COUN SECURED PROPERTY TAX alL'. For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 IN PaR SEC 19 TBS R2W FOR TOTAL ASSESSORS MAPS LP 00122635 REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 TREASURER-TAX COM. ECTOR 40`50 Lemon St - 4lb Floor, Riverside, California {P.O Box 12005. Rivers~e, CA 92502-2205) Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 0394562 Tax Rate Ame Parce~ Number 0].3-004 922230007-7 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTAN 1- INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE % TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV IETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800} 225-5693 ASTERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV (909) 925-7676 ANCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV (E) 909) 676-4101 LD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER~ 909~ 275-1200 EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS, ~ 909) 694-6480 ANCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE (~ 909) 676-4101 IWD STANDBY EAST ~ ,800) 528-2710 MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE, @ (909) 925-7676 Amo~mt 5927.29 664.50 200.93 195.60 1778.18 10.00 3572.00 1000.00 173.50 165.00 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -. YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) Dtle February II 1998 SECOND INSTALLMENT $6,843.50 PAY 11'11S AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE April 10, 1998 (See item #6 on reverse) $6,843.50 penally allel' t2/10/97 $6,843.50 SEND ONLY_THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $694. 33 alletAIx'# 10, 1998 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB 592 ,~,29 ~ c, fmus t~ST VALUE ~6,e43.5o Add 10% p~aly p~s SlO ~ ~er $6,843.50 ~SESSMENTNUMBER 922230007-7 BILL NUMBER 0394562 2ND INSTALLMENT tOM, NOT BE PAID UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID) 00000684350 0297 0394562 01 0219970394562000006843500410199800000753783242 Due November 1. 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $6,843.50 PAY 11'115 AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 SEND O_Nt._Y~ THIS STUB WITHYOUR 1st INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ 6 B 4 · 3 3 anal Decembet' 10. 1997 (This is a 10% penalty; lot eddilional charges, see items ,5 and 8 On reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON ,STUB ~SE~MENT NUMBER 922230007-7 8~NUMBER 0394562 I ST INSTALLMENT 00000684350 0197 0394562 0! 0119970394562000006843501210199700000752783236 RIVERSIDE COUN. , SECURED PROPERTY TAX elL,. For Fiscal Year July 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 FOR TOTAL e,y 16.11 ACRES M/L IN POR SEC 19 T8S R2W la DESCRIPTION SEE ASSESSORS MAPS er. JANUARY 1, 1997 REGENCY PROP LP REGENCY PROP LP C/O THE J W COLACHIS CO 533 S COAST BLV LA JOLLA, CA 92037 N. WAYNh WAI IS TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR Telephone: (909) 275-3900 or (760) 863-8900 0394563 Tax Rate Area Panel Number o13-oo4 9~223ooo~-8 0 09/25/1997 IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE % TAX LIMIT PER PROP 13 LEMENTARY SCHOOL DEBT SV IETROPOLITAN WTR DEBT SV (800) 225-5693 ASTERN MUNICIPAL WTR DEBT SV (909) 925-7676 ANCHO CAL WTR R DIV DEBT SV (~ f909) 676-4101 LD CNTL STORMWATER/CLEANWATER~ 1909I 275-1200 EMECULA PARKS/LIGHTING SVS. (~ (909) 694-6480 ANCHO CA WATER FIRE SERVICE ~ 19091 676-4101 WD STANDBY EAST @ (800) 528-2710 MWD STANDBY-COMBINED CHARGE. @ (909) 925-7676 3826.63 429.00 129.72 126.27 1147.98 6.44 2301.80 644.40 111.80 66.06 UNPAID PRIOR-YEAR '~XE~I ISee fiem · ? o~ Rever~el $4,395.05 Add 10% 1 penalty slier t2110/97 PLEASE KEEP TOP PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS '0 RECEIPTS WILL BE ISSUED -- YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT) $ 4, 3 9 5 . 0 5 Due Feb~umy 1. 1998 SEND ONLY THIS STUB WITH YOUR 2rid INSTALLMENT PAYMENT SECOND INSTALLMENT : RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES $4,395 · 05 Add $449 . 49 al~e, Ap~ ~O. ~9ee PaY THIS ,NI~OUNT ON OR ;tEFORE {This iS a 10"% penaRy p~us St0 cost; fo~ addilio~al charges see lieres $ and 6 on reverse} April 10, 1998 PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB (See item #6 on reverse) $4,395.05 Ad~ tO% penally plus 2 $10 ~ alter 4/1D~8 $4,395.05 ~SE~ME~ NUMBER 922230008-8 BILLNUMBER 0394563 2ND INSTALLMENT {CANNOT BE PA;D UNLESS FIRST INSTALLMENT IS PAID) 00000439505 0297 0394563 01 0219970394563000004395050410199800000484454248 Due November I, 1997 FIRST INSTALLMENT $4,395.05 PAY THIS AMOUNT ON OR BEFORE December 10, 1997 SEND _O_N_L~ THIS STUB WITH YOUR let INSTALLMENT PAYMENT RIVERSIDE COUNTY 1997-1998 SECURED PROPERTY TAXES Add $ 4 3 9 . 4 9 after Deoembe~ 10, 1997 (This is a tO% penalty; Ior additional cha~ges, see fiems 5 end 6 on reverse) PLEASE DO NOT WRITE ON STUB ~SE~MENT NUMBER 922230005-B BILL NUMBER 0394563 I iNS~.,,rALLMENT 00000439505 0197 0394563 01 0119970394563000004395051210199700000483454233 ORDINANCE NO~ 96-21 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CALn~ORNIA, L~VY!NG A SPECIAL TAX TO FINANCE THE OPERATIONSMAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIF~, RECREATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS, MidIAN LANDSCAPING, ARTERIAL STI~'~r LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEI~E~'I.1I~, CALifORNIA DOES ~ty ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ,qeetlon 1. Pursuant to thc authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, there is hereby levied and --q~,~'d a special tax by the City of Temecula on each txircel of propa~ in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year, commencing with fiscal year 1997-98. · qeetion ~. The maximum amount of ~aid special tax for each fiscal year shall be $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant p, opoty in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved propcaXy, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. · qeetion 3. The special tax impo=_wd by this ordinance shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to ~hc same lx:~alties and in~re~ a~ other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shah constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. Section 4. The reveaue raised by the special tax imposed by this ordinnnce shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of operating, maintaining, and servicing public parks and recrcational facilitic,% recamtional and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. 96-21 ~ecti,m ~. The Oty Council, by three (3) affu'm~tivc votes, is empowered to esl~d)lish the ~mounts of* the R)ecial t~x levy ~rmuaHy each fiscal yc~, in amounts rmt to exceed tbe nuudmum amounts specified in Section 2 of th~s ordinance, as is required to ordinance. ~ion 6. The City Council shall be empowered to antend this ordinance by three (3) affirmative votes of the members thereof for the p~ of carrying out the general purposes of this ordinance in order to conform to state law that permits the County Tax Collector, or other proper official, to collect a special tax such a~ is levied by this ordinance in conjunction with County taxes or in order to ~sign duties pursuant to the ordinance to other officers. Section 7. No section of this ordinance shah be construed to permit, and the City Council is expressly prohibited from, increasing the amounts of the special tax imposed by Otis ordinance beyond the maximum amounts set forth in this ordinance. ,~-inn Jr. A property owner subject to the special tax mny appeal the amount of the special tax to be levied on such property owner's property pursuant to standards and procedures established by resolution of the City Council. Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special lax during a specific fiscal ycar would create a hardship for that prop~y owner during that ~ year, such property ownen may appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal pursuant to standards and procedures established by re~lution of the City Council. ,~_,tlon 10. The special tax imposed by this ordinance shall not be imposed upon a federal or stnte governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of proproy that is ~¢mpt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Section l 1. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdic- lion, such invalidity or unconstitudonality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this ordinance are declared to be severable. The City Council, and the electorate by referendum, do hereby declare that they would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact thai any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitulional. ,~etion 1~. This ordinance, or any provisions thereof other than those provisions, if any, which provide for modificalion by the City Council of the City of Temecula, may only be amended or repealed by approval of two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting on the ordinance or provisions thereof at any initiative or referendum election. .qe~-tinn 13. The Ternccula Community Scrvices District currently operate, maintains and services public parks and rcc~'eafional facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, ~ street lights and traffic signals within the City of Temecula, Tbese sex¥ic~ must be continued without in~ption in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare of the residents therein and the general public. The adoption of Proposition 218 by the voters of the State of California has brought into question the ability of tire Temecula Community Services District to continue imposing ~atcs and charges to finance such services. Unless a special tax is imposed to Finance such services, the City may lacJc sufficient funds to continue such services. This ordinance would convert certain existing T~ Community Services District rates and charges to a tax. Imposition of a special tax requites two-thirds voter approval. Therefore, it is necessary to det~-~¥dne, at the earliest date poss~le prior to July 1, 1997, wbether a special tax shall be levied upon parcels within the City to finance such se..evices. In order for the ordinance to be placed on the ballot for the next county-administered election on March 4, 1997, the City must submit the ordinance to the County of Riverside prior to the datc of the next regular City Council raceting. Because of the County*s deadline, there is insufficient time for the City Council to have two readings of the ordinance prior to its adoption and submission to the County. It is therefore urgent that this ordinance be adopted immediately to prevent an interruption in services to be: provided to residents of the City. ~ interruption in such service is of great public concern in that inadexluate maintenance of public park and recreational facilities and street lighting and landscaping and curtailment of recreational and community services programs, may endanger the health, welfare and safety of schoolchildren, motorists, and reMdents of the City. This ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare, declares the facts constituting the urgency, and is passed by at least a four-fifths vote of the City Council. Accordingly, this measure is adopted immediately upon introduction pursuant to Govctmnent Code Section 36934. ~qectlon 14. This ordinance shall bc rcfcn*cd to, and shah be effective only if approved by two-thirds (2/3) majority of the voters voting at an election to be held on ldarch 4, 1997, and shall go into effect ten (10) days after the City Council has, by resolution, declared that this ordinance was approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters voting thereon. .qeetion IS. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shah cause same to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Tc~ this 26th day of November, 1996. ~/ ATTEST: 9~-21 a STATE OF C^Ln~ORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVF. RSID~S$ crr'r OF ULA ) I, June $. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Tcmecula, do hem'eby certify that the foregoing Or&uance No. 96-21 was duly and regularly adopied by the City Council of the City of Temecula ai a rugular meeting thereof held on {he 26th day of November, 1996, by the following yore 4 COUNCILMF.2~ERS: Birdsall, Ford, Stone, Linderoans NOES: 0 COUNCN.,MEMBERS: None ABSN/VT: 1 COUNCK,MEMBERS: Roberts .-6reck, City Cl~,-l~lC 96-21 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 97-72 A RESOI.,UTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLtqHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997-98 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS AND ~ OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACII.ITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ~REBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula approved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fm:al year, commencing with fiscal year 1997-98. Section ~. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year as established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi-family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non- residential improved property, and $37.22 per acre for _agricu_itural uses. _ ....... Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to estnblish the amounts of the special lax levy annually each f'tscal year, in amounts not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance. ,qection 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following amounts are required to provide an adequat~ level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following amounts to be levied as a special tax for fiscal year 1997-98, which amounts are less than the maximum amounts established by Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by the voters: $ 71.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit $ 53.58 per multi-family residential dwelling unit $142.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $285.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $~28.64 per acre of non-residential improved property $ 35.72 per acre of agricultural property Section 5. The spccial tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of thc City of Tcmccula. Said special tax, togcthcr with all penaltics and intercst thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall, until paid, constime a personal obligation to the City of Tcmccula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to ~e levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, conv~tion, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applieabe to the special tax, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. .%etlon 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and community services programs, and the operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. ~ection 7. Thc special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special lax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. ~tlon g. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to n-ansmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 1997, the property tax roll with the special lax enumerated for each parcel not cxempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefor. .g~e~on 9. !fa property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions the levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1997, pursuant to procedures established by the City. ,geeSion 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax for fiscal year 1997-98 would create a hardship for that property owner during that Rscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 1997, pursuant to procedures established by the City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Reso~97-72 '~ ~ection 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstimtionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City Council does hereby declar~ that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, clauses, phrases, parts or portions thereof, be declared invalid or unconstitutional. ,e~-tlon I~. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 2,~th day of June, 1997. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk [SEAL] Re~.~,97-~2 3 STATE OF CAT.n~ORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, June $. Or~ City Clerk of the City of Temecula, Califo~, do hem:by certify that Resolutkm No. 97-72 was duly and xcgularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 24th day of June, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOF. S: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL lV~-MBERS: COUNCIL lV~MBERS: Ford, Linderoans, Roberts, Stone, Birdsall None None C~ty Clerk ITEM 16 E1 Nino Update Oral Presentation by Director of Public Works Joe Kicak DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR. OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager '~(,/Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer March 31, 1998 Public Works Monthly Activity Report RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for February, 1998. r: \agdrpt\moactrpdajp CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Monthly Activity Report February 1998 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Scott Harvey Date: March 19, 1998 I. WORK UNDER CONSTRUCTION: 1. 1-15/Winchester Road Interchange Modifications: All work has been completed except for plant establishment. Plant establishment work will continue for approximately one year. 2. 1-15/Rancho California Road Interchange Modifications: The construction includes widening the south side of the bridge over the freeway, providing a new loop entrance ramp to northbound 1-15 Freeway from Rancho California Road, and relocation of the existing northbound exit ramp. The contractor has completed the grading work for the bridge abutments, however, a period of 60 days is normally required for soil settlement before bridge abutment construction can begin. The retaining wall on the south side of Rancho California Road adjacent to Kentucky Fried Chicken will be under construction for the next two to three months. Please note that traffic will be allowed through the work area during construction. The estimated time for construction and landscape maintenance is 16 and 12 months, respectively. 3. City Wide Intelligent Traffic Management System (ITMS}: All field work for this project has been completed. The computer system including the software has been delivered to City Hall. Currently the consultant is making the necessary connections and awaiting for Caltrans approval of the final signal timing plans. 4. ADA Improvement Project: This improvement project includes sidewalk access ramps, new playground equipment, and rubberized surfacing around existing play equipment for access by wheel chairs at Veterans Park, John Magee Park, and Calle Aragon Park as well as ADA improvements to Rancho Vista fields at the Rancho California Sports Park. The contractor is nearing completion of the finish grading and landscaping at the Rancho California Sports Park and the installation of the play structures and surfaces at the other three parks. Completion date is anticipated to be May 1998. 5. Traffic Siglaal Installation at the Intersection of Margarita Rd. and Yukon Rd./Honors Dr. Installation of the traffic signal at this intersection has been completed and the signal is currently in operation. Acceptance of this project is scheduled for the March 17 City Council meeting. R:[M OACTRPT\CIP~98\MAR.M AR seh 6. Margarita Community Park - Phase I: A preconstmction meeting was held on March 11. The project improvements will include restrooms, parking areas, picnic areas, play equipment, tennis courts, a roller hockey rink, ballfields, lighting, picnic shelters, sidewalks, landscaping with open turf areas as well as widening Margarita Road adjacent to the park to its ultimate width. Construction is anticipated to begin on March 23 with an estimated completion date of October 1998. 7. Winchester Creek Park: A preconstmction meeting was conducted on March 16. The project consists of a 4.5 acre neighborhood park with various improvements including restrooms, basketball courts, volleyball courts, play equipment, polygon shelters with picnic tables, concrete walkways, and a parking lot. Construction is anticipated to begin on April 6 with an estimated completion date of September 1998. 8. Cosmic Drive and Agena Street - Street Sidewalk Project//6: The project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Cosmic Drive between Rancho California Road and Agena Street and south side of Agena Street between Santa Cecilia Drive and Cosmic Drive. Staff is recommending award of a contract to Contreras Construction Co. at the March 17 Council meeting. Construction is anticipated to begin in April 1998 with an estimated completion date of June 1998. II. BID: 1. Traffic Signal at Pauba Road and Fire Station 84 On March 17, the City Council awarded the project. Once the contract documents are submitted and a purchase order is issued a preconstruction meeting will be scheduled. An anticipated completion date is July 1998. 2. Traffic Signal at Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkway On March 17, the City Council awarded the project. Once the contract documents are submitted and a purchase order is issued a preconstruction meeting will be scheduled. An anticipated completion date is August 1998. 3. Traffic Signal at Pala Road and Rainbow Canyon Road The bids for this project were opened on February 19 and the award of a construction contract for this signal is scheduled for the March 31 City Council meeting. R:\M OACTRPT\CIP\98\M AR.M AR seh 4. CRC Gymmanium Air Conditioning System: Since the opening of the Temecula Community Recreation Center gymnasium the facility has operated without an air conditioning or cooling system. This project will provide for the installation of an air conditioning and temperature control system for the CRC Gymnasium. The project is presently out to public bid with a bid opening date of March 26. Construction is anticipated to begin in May 1998 with an estimated completion date of September 1998. III. WORK IN DESIGN: 1.1-15/Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements: The roadway plans have been submitted and signed by Caltrans (District 8). The structural plans have already been approved and signed by Caltrans, Division of Structures. SCE is also working on the design for the relocation of the existing 115, 33, & 12 KVA overhead power lines. These lines are scheduled to be relocated concurrently with the construction of the proposed Overland Drive Over Crossing Improvements. The transmission and distribution sections of SCE have finalized their alignment. The City is in the process of acquiring right of way, utility easements and temporary construction easements necessary for the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of October 1999. 2. FY96-97 Pavement Management System: The consultant is expected to submit a plan check to the City by March 23. Staff expects to return the plan check within two weeks after the submittal date. This project will provide street rehabilitation of Jefferson Avenue from the northerly city limits to Rancho California Road. This project will also include the installation of street lighting along the entire length of the project. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of November 1998. 3. Pavement Management System Up-Date: The consultant has completed the public parking facilities' report and has submitted the P.M.S. Up-Date reports for City's review. This project will review and update the existing Pavement Management System computer program which will include new streets which were added to the City's maintained system, preparing a new 5-year street maintenance program. Submittal to City Council for review and approval is anticipated for May 1998. 4. Winchester Road & Ynez Road Street Widening: Caltrans returned the first plan check comments to the consultant on March 4. The consultant expects to return the plans to Caltrans the week of March 23. Utility Companies are also reviewing the plans to identify potential conflicts with the proposed improvements. The scope of work includes the street widening improvements on the south side of Winchester Road between Ynez Road and Margarita Road, and the improvements on the east side of Ynez Road between Winchester Road and Overland Drive. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of March 1999. R:WIOACTRPT\CIP\98~MAR.MAR seh 5. Overland Drive Street Improvements & Margarita Road Street Wideni~ig: The consultant is presently addressing the City's and Riverside County Flood Control's plan check comments and expects to resubmit the week of March 30. The proposed improvements will be on Overland Drive between Ynez Road and Margarita Road and on Margarita Road from Overland Drive to Winchester Road. Utility companies have been notified to address potential conflicts or new facilities which may be proposed. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of March 1999. 6. Flashing Beacons at Various !Jocations: The City returned the last plan check to the consultant on March 5. The consultant is expected to submit the original plans for signatures the week of March 30. The plans have also been reviewed by Temecula Valley School District. This project consists of installing flashing beacons that warn of children in the immediate area at 10 different school sites throughout the City. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of September 1998. 7. Margarita Road Sidewalk ¢Rancho Vista to Pauba): The consultant is presently revising the plans in response to staff's second plan check comments. The improvements will include the installation of concrete curbs, gutter, and sidewalk along the west side of Margarita Road between Rancho Vista Road and Pauba Road. The sidewalk will improve access to the Rancho California Sports Park. Also, as part of the design, additive alternate improvements will include ADA ramp access from Margarita Road to the adjacent ballfields along with an expanded parking area. The project is anticipated to bid in early April. Construction is anticipated to begin in July 1998 with an estimated completion date of October 1998. 8. 1-15/Winchester Southbound Off-ramp Widening: The consultant has submitted the first plan check to the City and Caltrans. The project will provide an additional turning lane from the southbound off-ramp onto Winchester Road. This project will also require a retaining wall between the southbound off-ramp and the southbound loop on-ramp due to the existing grades in the area of the ramp widening. The consultant is expecting the first plan check to be returned by Caltrans in late-March. Construction is anticipated to begin in September 1998 with an estimated completion date of March 1999. 9. Winchester Road Median Islands: The consultant expects to submit last plan check to the City the week of March 30. This project includes installation of median islands with landscaping and irrigation along Winchester Road between Enterprise Circle West and Jefferson Avenue along with the installation of a traffic signal at Enterprise Circle West. Also, the existing median islam at Jefferson Avenue will be modified to provide for a longer left turn pocket for east bound traffic. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of February 1999. R:\M OACTRPT\CIP\98\M AR.M AR seh 10. Pala Road Bridge: A Consultant is in the process of preparing the preliminary documentation required by Caltrans to receive HBRR Funds as well as performing utility research and design surveys. This project will include the realignment of Pala Road from Highway 79 South to Rainbow Canyon Road, which will require that a new bridge be constructed, two new traffic signals to be installed, the removal of two (2) traffic signals, the installation of sound walls, sidewalks, landscaping, irrigation, street lighting, bike lanes, signing, striping, channel improvements, and provisions for Wetland Mitigation. Construction is anticipated bo begin in October 1998 with an estimated completion date of December 1999. 11. Winchester Sidewalk: The City has returned the first plan check back to the consultant on March 3. The consultant expects to return the plans within three weeks. This project consists of the installation of sidewalks on the west side of Winchester Road between Margarita Road and Winchester Creek Avenue. Construction is anticipated to begin in June 1998 with an estimated completion date of September 1998. 12. Temecula Duck Pond Park: The Temecula Duck Pond Park Project will include both park and offsite street improvements. Park improvements will include a gazebo/bandstand, picnic facilities, a restroom, walkways, a parking lot, security lighting, monumentation, landscaping and irrigation. The street improvements will consist of the widening of Ynez Road to full width between Rancho California Road and Tierra Vista Road and will include new sidewalks along with additional turn lanes, traffic signal modifications at Ynez Road and Rancho California Road and pavement re-striping to improve traffic circulation. First plan check comments were returned to the consultant for revisions on February 24. Construction is anticipated to begin in July 1998 with an estimated completion date of December 1998. 13. Traffic Signals: Currently there are three new traffic signals under design. The three intersections include Solana Way at Margarita Road, Margarita Road at Santiago Road, and Rancho California Road at Via Los Colinas. Construction is anticipated to begin in October 1998 with an estimated completion date of February 1999. R:tM OACTRPT\CIP\98\M AR.MAR ~,eh LAND DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY ACTIVITY REPORT SPECIAL PROJECTS FEBRUARY 1998 Submitted by: Joseph Kicak Prepared by: Ronald J. Parks Date: March 23, 1998 1. PW95-07 - Phase I Western Bypass Corridor: The pre-construction meeting for the Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S) interchange improvements including Front Street realignment and its intersection with Western Bypass Corridor will be scheduled in near future. 2. PW95-08 - First Street Fxtension: The documents for acquiring the required properties are being prepared for final acquisition. 3. PW95-96 - 6th Street Parking Project: The contractor's bonding company has payed off most of the sub-contractors and suppliers and most of the stop notices from said parties have been released. Once all of the stop notices have been released and the Contractor submits the affidavit and maintenance bond, the notice of completion will be filed. PW96-05 - Project Study Report (PSR) And Project Report (PR! For Ultimate Interchange Improvements at Interstate 15/State Route 79 South (I-15/SR79S): The PSR analysis will resume once the update on the Circulation Element of the General Plan is finaled. 5. General Plan Circ,dation Flement Update: The consultant has been selected. A committee comprised of Cities of Temecula and Murrieta representatives has been formed to provide direction for the update process. 6. The Regional Mall Project: The design of the perimeter infrastructure improvements are in progress. The consultants are in the process of revising the plans per the plan check comments. R :XMO AC'F RPTkDEVX98 WEB .WPD I-- Z I~J MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Joseph Kicak, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent March 2, 1998 Monthly Activity Report - February, 1998 The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in- house personnel for the month of February, 1998: SIGNS A. Total signs replaced 25 B. Total signs installed 7 C. Total signs repaired 0 II. III. TREES A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns POTHOLES A. Total square feet of potholes repaired 14 ),3~7 IV. CATCH BASINS A. Total catch basins cleaned 598 Vo RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL A. Total locations 3 B. Total S.F. 387 VII. STENCILING A. 84 New and repainted legends B. 4.691 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping 1 R:\M AIN TAI N'~I OACTRPT~98\FEB R UARY.RPT Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 56 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming, sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 40 service order requests for the month of JAm,Ary. 1998. The Maintenance Crew has also put in 318 events and response to street emergencies. hours of overtime which includes standby time, special The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of FebruAry. 1998 was $ 64.01~.50 compared to $193.867.46 for the month of JAr~uary. 1998. Account No. 5402 Account No. 5401 Account No. 999-5402 37,449.00 21,015.00 5,548.00 CC: Ron Parks, Principal Engineer - Land Development Ali Moghadam, Associate Engineer - (CIP/Traffic) R:'~IAIN TAIN \M 0 AC TRPT~98\FEBRUARY.RPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 1998 DATE DESCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STRFIrT/CHANN!=L/BRIDC~I; OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOR: Date: 2/17/98 MONT!=L;ON!= !=XCAVATINR Calle De Velardo Repair Street Failure Due To Heavy Rains Date: 2/17/98 Pauba Road at Church Site TOTAL COST Repairs To R.O.W. Erosion $ 4,872.00 Date: 2/19/98 Rancho Vista at Camino Romo TOTAL COST $ 4,500.00 Repairs To R.O.W. Erosion And Shoulder Grading Date: 2/26/98 Citywide TOTAL COST $ 4,500.00 Cleaning Of Streets Citywide Of Debris And Silt Due To Heavy Rains Date: 2/27/98 Old Town TOTAL COST $ 6,912.00 Washing Of Streets With Water Truck Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST $ 515.00 R:\MAINTAIN~MOACTRPT\gS\FEBRUARY.RPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 1998 DATE DIFSCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STRFFT/CHANN;L/BRIDG!: OF WORK SIZE !. Wl! LIAMS ILAND.~CAP!= Citywide CONTRACTOR; Date: 2/17/98 Emergency Citywide Tree Trimming Due To High Winds And Heavy Rains CONTRACTOR: Date: 2/06/98 P!=STMASTFR S!=RVIC!=S Ynez Road Between Santiago and Vallejo TOTAL COST $ 550.00 Treatment Of Weeds At City Owned Lot Using Pre And Post Emergent Herbicides CONTRACTOR: Date: 2/12/98 B!=CKFR FRINFFRINC~ 41900 Moreno Road Motel Six TOTAL COST $ 2,275.00 Remove And Replace 2 Type 308 Under Sidewalk Drains Date: 2/27/98 Walcott Corridor and Calle Girasol TOTAL COST $ 4,900.00 Emergency Street Debris Clean-Up Due To Heavy Rains CONTRACTOR: Date: 2/06/98 //5401 SACK;TT CONSTRUCTION "C" Street Channel TOTAL COST $ 3,625.00 Emergency Repairs To Channel Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST $ 1,171.50 4 R:~M AINTAIN\M OACTRPT~9 8 \FEBR UARY.RPT STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of February, 1998 DATE DIFSCRIPTION TOTAL COST ACCOUNT STRFFT/CHANNFL/BRIDRI= OF WORK SIZE CONTRACTOk : Date: 2/26/98 # 5401 Date:2/26/98 # 5401 Date: 2/17/98 # 999-5402 Level R Date: 2/19/98 # 999-5402 Date: 2/26/98 # 999-5402 Level R Date: 2/26/98 # 999-5402 ServiceLevel R MONT;! I;ON!= II=XCAVATINR Via Lobo Channel Santiago Channel Santiago Road, John Warner Road and Surrounding Roads Leifer Road And Surrounding Roads Leifer Road And Surrounding Roads Santiago Road, John Warner Road And Surrounding Roads TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT. #5402 TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT. #5401 TOTAL AMOUNT ACCT. #999-5402 Removal Of Silt And Debris From Channel TOTAL COST I $ 9,984.00 Removal Of Silt And Debris From Channel And Repair Desilting Ponds TOTAL COST I $ 9,860.00 Grading Of Dirt Roads Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST I $ 950.00 Grading Of Dirt Roads Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST $ 1,520.00 Grading of Dirt Roads Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST $ 760.00 Grading Of Dirt Roads Due To Heavy Rains TOTAL COST I $ 2,318.00 $ 37,449.00 $ 21,015.50 $ 5,548,00 R:~MAI N TAJ N~t OACTRPT\98\FEBR UARY.RPT UJ UJ z,,~ zm z 00' v,,' 0 ~ 8~. ,r- 0 0 O0 0 i"4 oO O~ .r- 0 I'- 0 I'-- CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 DATE 02/02/98 02/02/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/06/98 02/07/98 02/08/98 02/08/98 02/09/98 02/14/98 02/17/98 02/19/98 02/22/98 02/23/98 02/24/98 LOCATION AREAS #1 AND #2 AREAS #3 AND g4 AREAS #3 AND g4 AREAS #1 AND #2 CITYWIDE AREAS #1 AND #2 AREAS #3 AND g4 CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE CITYWIDE WORK COMPLETED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED CLEANED & CHECKED 60 CATCH BASINS 14 CATCH BASINS 17 CATCH BASINS 30 CATCH BASINS 8 CATCH BASINS 4 CATCH BASINS 38 CATCH BASINS 56 CATCH BASINS 53 CATCH BASINS 16 CATCH BASINS 31 CATCH BASINS 76 CATCH BASINS 47 CATCH BASINS 11 CATCH BASINS 75 CATCH BASINS 30 CATCH BASINS 13 CATCH BASINS 19 CATCH BASINS TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED ~98 R:~LM/~AI'~WKCMPLETD~ATCH BAS~8~FEBRUARY.RPT [ DATE 02/05/98 02/09/98 02/18/98 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION GRAFFITI REMOVAL MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 LOCATION [ NORTH GENERAL KEARNY AT SERRANO "C" STREET AT SANTIAGO JEFFERSON AT "2 GUYS MOVE YOU" TRUCK WORK COMPLETED REMOVED 12 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED 300 S.F. OF GRAFFITI REMOVED 75 S.F. OF GRAFFITI TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED TOTAL LOCATIONS 387 3 R:~fAINTAIN[WKC MPLTD\GR.AFFl'IIY98~FEBRUARY.RPT DATE 02/05/98 02/09/98 02/10/98 02/12/98 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 LOCATION MARGARITA AT PIO PICO FRONT STREET AT FIRST STREET OLD TOWN OLD TOWN WORK COMPLETED TRIMMED 3 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 1 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 6 R.O.W. TREES TOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 14 R:~MAINTAII~WKCM PLTD~TREESLO~FEBRUARY.RFT DATE o2/10/98 02/11/98 02/12/98 I OLD TOWN OLD TOWN OLD TOWN CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 LOCATION I I ABATED ABATED ABATED WORK COMPLETED 6,000 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 7,340 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS 7,860 S.F.R.O.W. WEEDS TOTAL S.F. R-O-W WEEDS ABATE 21~200 R:~IAINTAII~WKCMPLTD\WEED ~98~FEBRUARY.RPT CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 DATE RECEIVED 02/02/98 02/02/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/05/98 02/05/98 02/06/98 02/06/98 02/06/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/11/98 02/11/98 02/12/98 02/11/98 LOCATION 40564 WINDSOR ROAD 29115 FRONT STREET 42986 VIA JUMILLA 39857 AMBERLY CIRCLE 42798 AGENA 32237 PLACER BELAIR 42075 AVENIDA ALVARADO 31480 NICOLAS 32023 VIA BONILLA CALLE DE VELARDO 31872 CORTE POSITAS SINGLE OAK AT RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD 45344 TOURNAMENT LANE RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT YNEZ ROAD 39310 GREENWOOD LANE 30800 LOLITA ROAD 43375 JOHN WARNER ROAD 30584 BAY HILL DRIVE 45414 CLUBHOUSE 41985 KAFFIRBOOM COURT 42963 AGENA 31830 CORTE MENDOZA 43136 CAMINO CASILLAS DIAZ AT BLACK DEER LOOP TOWN CENTER 32553 BATSON LANE 29891 LONGVALE COURT REQUEST DRAIN CLEANING POTHOLES DEBRIS PICK-UP STORM RUN-OFF CONCERN STORM RUN-OFF CONCERN POTHOLES CHANNEL CLEANING DIRT ROAD WASH-OUT POTHOLES STREET FAILURE HILLSIDE EROSION TREE DOWN TREE TRIMMING POTHOLE ROAD GRADING ROAD GRADING ROAD GRADING POTHOLE TREE TRIMMING TREE TRIMMING TREE TRIMMING DEBRIS REMOVAL POTHOLE CONSTRUCTION QUESTION POTHOLE CONCRETE REMOVAL ROOT PRUNE DATE WORK COMPLETED 02/02/98 02/02/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/03/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/04/98 02/05/98 02/05/98 02/06/98 02/06/98 02/06/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/09/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/10/98 02/11/98 02/11/98 02/12/98 02/11/98 1 R:'~,AINTAIN~WKCM PLTD\SORSLOg~FEBRUARY.PdPT DATE RECEIVED 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/18/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/23/98 O2/23/98 02/23/98 02/23/98 02/24/98 02/24/98 02/24/98 02/25/98 LOCATION 40120 PASEO DEL SOL 42064 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA 39856 NORTH GENERAL KEARNY 31425 PASEO GOLETA 29806 VIA PUESTA DEL SOL LEIFER ROAD POTTERY SHOP ON MAIN STREET MARGARITA S/O RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD PALA VISTA DRIVE 41680 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH MARGARITA AT SOLANA 31220 KAHWEA ROAD 43973 EL LUCERO 31872 CORTE POSITAS 44860 CORTE ANTIGUA 31220 KAHWEA 44860 CORTE ANTIGUA SOLANA WAY AT MARGARITA ROAD 30260 SANTIAGO 42225 ALTANOS ROAD 42067 AVENIDA VISTA LADERA 31844 & 31854 CORTE POSITAS SOLANA WAY AT MARGARITA ROAD 31082 CAMINO VERDE SOLANA WAY AT MARGARITA ROAD 44648 CLOVER LANE 43020 JOHN WARNER ROAD FRONT STREET AND 5TH STREET NICOLAS ROAD AT JOSEPH ROAD REQUEST ROOT PRUNE ROOT PRUNE TREE TRIMMING TREE TRIMMING RETRIEVAL FROM S.D. ROAD FLOODED GRAFFITI POTHOLES ROAD GRADING DEBRIS PICK-UP WATER IN STREET FENCE DOWN MUD IN STREET THANK-YOU TRESPASSING ON PROPERTY FENCE REPAIR TRESPASSING ON PROPERTY MUD IN STREET STREET GRADING STREET GRADING TRACTOR LEFT BEHIND TRENCH REPAIR IVIUD IN STREET TREE DOWN MUD IN STREET GRAFFITI IN SIDEWALK ROAD GRADING SNS REPAIR POTHOLES TOTAL SER¥ICE ORDER REQUESTS DATE WORK COMPLETED 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/12/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/17/98 02/18;98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/19/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 02/20/98 O2/23/98 02/23/98 02/23/98 02/23/98 02/24/98 02/24/98 02/24/98 02/25/98 2 kq~,INTAINAWKCMPLTD\SORSL~%FEBRUARY.RPT 02/10/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/18/98 02/22/98 02/24/98 02/26/98 CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION SIGNS MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 LOCATION FRONT ST. SOUTH OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD VALLEJO NORTH OF PALM DRIVE VALLEJO NORTH OF PALM DRIVE 1 ST STREET AT PUJOL 2950O MIRA LOMA 30660 MILKY WAY 29489 VIA LAS COLINAS RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD. AT VIA LAS COLINAS VIA CALI AT AMARITA CIRCLE LOMA LINDA AT VIA DEL CORONADO WALCOTT AT CALLE GIRASOL I WORK COMPLETED REPLACED 18 DELINATORS DAMAGED REPLACED 2 R-26 INSTALLED 1 R-26 REPLACED TYPE "N" DAMAGED INSTALLED 2 HOUSING SIGNS INSTALLED 3 HOUSING SIGNS INSTALLED 1 HOUSING SIGNS REPLACED S.N.S. "STOLEN" REPLACED R-1 "T.C." REPLACED R- 1 "T.C." REPLACED S.N.S. "T.C." TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED TOTAL SIGNS INSTAIJ.ED TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 25 7 0 R:~&MIqTAIN~WKCM PLTD\SIGIq~98~FEBRUAKY.RPT DATE 02/09/98 02/09/98 o2/10/98 o2/11/98 OLD TOWN OLD TOWN OLD TOWN OLD TOWN CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ROADS DIVISION STENCILS / STRIPING MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 1998 LOCATION I I REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED REPAINTED WORK CO'MPLETED 4,691 L.F. OFRED CURB 7 LEGENDS 35 LEGENDS 42 LEGENDS TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS L.F. OR NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING 84 4.691 R:~uMIqTAIN~WKC MPLTD'~TRI P1NG~98kFEBRUARY. RPT CITY ATTORNEY /~ V~d~/~ DIRECTOR OF FINAN~.E ~J/~-- CITY MANAGER ~' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/~t,~ Cgun~l FROM: Gary Thornhi[17Co~munity Development Director DATE: March 31, 1998 SUBJECT: Monthly Report Prepared by: Valerie Wimberly, Administrative Secre , r*,~~ RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File ,~t~ Discussion: The following is a summary of the Community Development Department's Planning Division caseload and project activity for the month of February 1998: Caseload Activity: The Department received 45 applications for administrative cases and 5 applications for public hearing cases for the month of February. The following are the public hearing cases: · Minor Conditional Use Permit · Development Plan - with CEOA Total Attachments: 1. 2. List of Activities with Detail - page 2 Revenue Status Report - page 3 1 4 5 R:~VIONTI-R.Y. RPT~ 1998~.BRUARY. WPD 3/24/9R vgw I Ongoing Projects: Sign Ordinance: This item will be scheduled for City Council consideration in upcoming months. Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: The charging stations at the 6th Street parking lot and the maintenance facility have been installed. Regional Mall: Phase I grading operations have ended, Phase II to commence in April. Building construction is expected to commence in spring of 1998, with the opening scheduled for August 1999. 7ev Buffman Entertainment Project: No Activity. Murdy Ranch Specific Plan: Staff is awaiting contact from the new owner. No activity on this case. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: A Notice of Preparation for EIR has been completed. The applicant is submitting a Specific Plan application on April 1, 1998. Southside Specific Plan: Urban Design Studios has started the preliminary work for the preparation of the specific plan to prepare specific standards to begin the revitalize the Front Street corridor south of the Old Town area. Staff and the consultant are preparing a draft Specific Plan utilizing the preferred conceptual Land Use Plan. Massage Business Ordinance: Staff held a second meeting with the massage professionals in December 1997. The ordinance will be presented to the City Council in April 1998. Adult Business Ordinance: The Council adopted an urgency ordinance in 1996. Staff is currently working on the permanent ordinance to regulate adult businesses while not curtailing a citizen right of free speech and expression. A committee of Ron Roberts and Ron Guerriero will examine the appropriate zones that adult business should be permitted before this ordinance is scheduled for the City Council hearing. General Plan Circulation Element UI;)date (and revision to citywide traffic study): The consultant has commenced work. Staff will be meeting with the consultant the week of March 30, 1998. Staff will be attempting to schedule Steering Committee meetings starting mid-April. Michael Naggar will be the Citizen-at-Large. Subdivision Ordinance: Staff is in the process of developing an appropriate subdivision ordinance for the City. The City currently uses Riverside County Ordinance No. 460 to regulate the subdivision of land. Redhawk/Vail Ranch Annexation Study: Staff will present the results of the study requested by the County to determine the best methodology for the allocation of landscape maintenance costs and a fiscal impact analysis conducted by the City at the April 28, 1998 meeting. Utilizing this information, the City Council will instruct staff on whether to proceed with annexation. R:~VIONTHLY.RPT~199gWEBRUARY. WPD 3/24/98 vgw 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 LIST OF ACTIVITY BY CASE NUMBER R:'qVIONTI-~Y.RPT~1998WEBRUARY. WPD 3/24Dg vgw 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 REVENUE STATUS REPORT R:~IONTHLY.RPTx1998WEBRUARY. WPD 3/24D8 vgw 4 REVPRIN2 03/02/98 001 161 ACCOUNT # 4101 4102 4103 4104 4105 4106 4107 4108 4109 4110 4112 4113 4114 4115 4116 4117 4118 4119 4120 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4135 4136 4139 4140 4170 4171 4190 4195 4200 4206 4369 4370 10:52:21 GENERAL FUND PLANNING DESCRIPTION AMENDED FINAL MAP APPEALS CERT. OF LAND DIV. COMPLIANCE EXTENSION OF TIME SINGLE FAMILY TRACTS MULTI-FAMILY TRACTS PARCEL MAPS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MINOR CHANGE PARCEL MERGER (2-4 LOTS) REVERSION TO ACREAGE (5+LOTS) MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT SECOND UNIT PERMITS CHANGE OF ZONE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONSISTENCY CHECKS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PLOT PLAN PUBLIC USE PERMIT REVISED PERMIT SETBACK ADJUSTMENT SPECIFIC PLAN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE TEMORARY OUTDOOR EVENT TEMPORARY USE PERMIT VARIANCE ZONING INFORMATION LETTER CEQA (INITIAL STUDIES) CEQA ENVIROMENT IMPACT REPORT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PARCEL MAP/WAIVER MERGER CONDO TRACT MAP REVERSION TO ACREAGE K-RAT STUDY FEES HOME OCCUPATIONS DEVLPMNT PLAN-ADMINISTRATIVE DIF REDUCTION APPLICATION IN HOUSE PLAN CHECKS ANNEXATION FEES LAND DIV UNIT MAP LANDSCAPE PLAN CHECK CITY OF TEMECULA REVENUE STATUS REPORT FEBRUARY 1998 ADJUSTED ESTIMATE .00 .00 .00 5,900.00 24,700.00 .00 30,500.00 16,800.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 3,600.00 31,100.00 16,300.00 5,600.00 111,900.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 5,200.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 13,700.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 7~400.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 FEBRUARY REVENUE .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 115.00 460.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 532.00 .00 .00 15,788.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 555.00 543.00 .00 .00 18.00 2,948.05 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 650.00 1,110.00 .00 .00 15,575.00 1997-98 REVENUE .00 1,950.00 900.00 1,168.00 8,868.80 .00 22,324.40 2,530.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 2,746.00 21,013.00 .00 .00 71,931.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 5,735.00 1,719.00 .00 1,476.00 108.00 18,721.70 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 650.00 7,030.00 .00 187.00 40,404.00 PAGE BALANCE .00 1,950.00- 900.00- 4,732.00 15,831.20 .00 8,175.60 14,270.00 700.00 2,900.00 .00 13,500.00 .00 854.00 10,087.00 16,300.00 5,600.00 39,969.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 5,735.00- 1,719.00- 5,200.00 1,476.00- 108.00- 18,721.70- .00 13,700.00 .00 1,500.00- .00 .00 .00 4,500.00 7,400.00 650.00- 7,030.00- .00 313.00 40,404.00- % COL 19.8 35.9 73.2 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.3 67.6 0.0 0.0 64.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 PLANNING 295,000.00 38,294.05 210,961.90 84,038.10 71.5