Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
052114 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 21, 2014— 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 14-12 PRELUDE MUSIC: Earlene Bundy CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS 1 Business Spotlight Recognition Presentation, Golden West Biologicals, Inc., Christine Damko PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time limit for individual speakers. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 r � ITEJ1 1 L J CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: May 21, 2014 SUBJECT: Business Recognition Program — Golden West Biologicals PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst BACKGROUND: Golden West Biologicals, Inc. (GWB) is a privately held company headquartered in Temecula, California. The company was formed in 1989 to directly address the need for cost effective and technically superior biological raw materials for in vitro diagnostic applications. GWB employs 17 people and provides more than 700 manufacturers and laboratories throughout the world with over 400 human and animal biological products. GWB offers a vast line of biological products that are critical components for the development and manufacture of immunoassays. An immunoassay is a biochemical test that labs, doctors, hospitals and research institutions use in their medical and pharmaceutical research. Products include processed human sera matrices, highly purified protein fractions, disease state plasmas, antigens and antibodies. GWB has also developed the Mass Spect Gold and Seratrol product lines to address customer need for ultra-low human sera for ultrasensitive testing and matrix- effect free base material for calibrators and controls. r � ITEM 2 L J ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 7, 2014— 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 14-10 PRELUDE MUSIC: Earlene Bundy CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Carey Roll Call: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio ABSENT: KIGHT Staff Attendees: Villa, Lee, Garcia, Fisk, Taylor NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of April 2, 2014 APPROVED 4-0-1-0; MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CAREY; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS CAREY, GUERRIERO, HARTER AND TELESIO; KIGHT ABSENT 2 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and File RECEIVE AND FILE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be 1 limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 3 Planning Application Nos. PA13-0206 and PA13-0207, a Development Plan for Ashbrook Communities to construct 76 detached single-family residential units on a condominium lot consisting of three elevations and four floor plans, ranging in size from 2,294 to 2,542 square feet, located in Tract No. 34715 of the Redhawk Specific Plan, and a Tentative Parcel Map for condominium purposes, on approximately 7.72 acres, located at the southeast corner of Peach Tree Street and Deer Hollow Way, Kenny Taylor APPROVED 4-0-1-0; MOTION MADE BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS CAREY, GUERRIERO, HARTER AND TELESIO; KIGHT ABSENT 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0206, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR ASHBROOK COMMUNITIES TO CONSTRUCT 76 DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON A CONDOMINIUM LOT CONSISTING OF THREE ELEVATIONS AND FOUR FLOOR PLANS, RANGING IN SIZE FROM 2,294 TO 2,542 SQUARE FEET, LOCATED IN TRACT 34715 OF THE REDHAWK SPECIFIC PLAN, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PEACH TREE STREET AND DEER HOLLOW WAY (RELATED APPLICATION PA13-0207 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) (APN 962-020-018) 3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA13-0207, A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR 76 DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON 7.72 ACRES, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PEACH TREE STREET AND DEER HOLLOW WAY (RELATED APPLICATION PA13-0206, DEVELOPMENT PLAN) (APN 962-020-018) Patrice Lynes addressed the Planning Commission Wayne Hall addressed the Planning Commission 2 REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, May 21, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Stanley Harter Armando G. Villa, AICP Chairman Director of Community Development 3 r � ITEM 3 L J STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 21, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Dale West, Case Planner PROJECT Long Range Planning Project No. LR14-0013 SUMMARY: CEQA: Not a Project as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and make a determination that the projects included in the CIP are in conformance with the adopted City of Temecula General Plan BACKGROUND SUMMARY Sections 65403 and 65402 of State Planning and Zoning Law require that the Planning Commission review and provide comments to the City Council regarding the conformity of the proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the adopted General Plan. The role of the Planning Commission is to review the proposed projects and determine if the projects are consistent with the City's General Plan. The draft CIP was developed by Executive Staff based on the previous CIP project list and current community needs. The public will have an opportunity to provide input to the draft CIP during a workshop with the City Council and City staff. The primary focus of this workshop is to ensure that staff's vision is in-line with community needs in the areas of roads, bridges, public buildings, parks and recreation facilities, and housing projects. All projects were reviewed to ensure consistency with the provision of the City's General Plan, as well as the long-term vision of the City as defined by the Quality of Life Master Plan. The projects within the Capital Improvement Program are divided into four general categories. The categories are: Circulation, Infrastructure/Other, Parks and Recreation, and Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency/Housing. Staff has reviewed the Capital Improvement Program in relationship to the goals and policies of the City's General Plan as part of the consistency review. The following is a summary of staff's analysis. 1 ANALYSIS Circulation Projects The Fiscal Year 2015-19 CIP contains 17 Circulation Projects. The Circulation Projects consist of maintenance projects, new circulation infrastructure, and traffic safety improvements. The Circulation Projects are as follows: • Abbott Corporation Roadway Improvement • Butterfield Stage Road Extension • Diaz Road Widening • Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs • French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvement - Phase I • French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase II • Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program - Citywide • Interstate 15/State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange • Medians and Parkways - Citywide • Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road • Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide • Pavement Rehabilitation Program -Winchester Road • Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement Program - Citywide • Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide • Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation • Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek • Ynez Road Widening Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with the provisions of the Circulation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Air Quality, and Community Design Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Circulation Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Circulation Element Policy 1.1 Use the Circulation Element Roadway Plan to guide detailed planning and implementation of the City's roadway system, including appropriate road width and median transitions when a roadway classification changes. Policy 1.2 Pursue trip reduction and transportation systems management measures to reduce and limit congestion at intersections and along streets within the City. 2 Policy 2.2 Develop a bypass system of roadways on the east, west and south sides of the City to accommodate traffic flow from development outside the City and improve center-of-town traffic conditions. Policy 2.3 Actively pursue improvements to current freeway interchanges within the City and construction of new overpasses as required to achieve performance standards. Policy 3.1 Require proper spacing and interconnect traffic signals where feasible to maximize the smooth progression of traffic flows and to minimize delay and stop- and-go conditions. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Policy 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occurs in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. Air Quality Element Policy 3.2 Use transportation systems management techniques to maintain an orderly flow of traffic and improve mobility. Policy 4.1 Encourage community-wide reductions in energy consumption through conservation. Community Design Element Policy 4.8 Work with Caltrans to implement a freeway and interchange landscaping and planting program to improve the appearance of the community. This program should incorporate appropriate native and drought tolerant species. Infrastructure/Other Projects The Fiscal Year 2015-19 CIP contains 22 Infrastructure Projects. The Infrastructure Projects consist of minor enhancements or repairs to existing infrastructure and new community infrastructure. The Infrastructure Projects are as follows: • Bike Lane and Trail Program • City Facilities Rehabilitation • Citywide Sidewalks • Citywide Storm Drain Improvements • Citywide Surveillance Cameras • Consolidate and Update Evaluation of Disabled Access to City Facilities and Programs • Developer Reimbursements • Facility Improvements/Enhancements/Expansions • Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade • Fire Station Roripaugh Ranch Site - Phase II • Library Parking Phase II 3 • Medians and Ornamental Pedestrian Barriers - Citywide • Murrieta Creek Improvements • Old Town Sidewalk Rehabilitation • Open Space Acquisition Program • Pauba Road Sidewalks • Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation • Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect • Teen Center • Temecula Park and Ride • Theater Remediation • YMCA Repair and Remediation Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with provisions of the Land Use, Circulation, Open Space/Conservation, and Growth Management/Public Facilities, Public Safety, Community Design, Air Quality, and Economic Development Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Infrastructure Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Land Use Element Policy 4.4 Create distinctive open space and other areas around the City to prevent urban sprawl. Policy 6.1 Preserve the natural aesthetic quality of hillsides and reduce hazards associated with hillside development within the Planning Area. Policy 6.5 Create distinctive features at entry points to the City that emphasize Temecula's aesthetic and environmental setting. Circulation Element Policy 3.3 Provide a comprehensive system of Class I and/or Class II bicycle lanes to meet the needs of cyclists traveling to and from work and other destinations within the City. Policy 3.5 Encourage the provision of additional regional public transportation services and support facilities, including park-and-ride lots near the 1-15 freeway and within mixed use overlay areas and village centers. Policy 5.2 Minimize potential conflicts between off-street bicycle and equestrian trails and automobile cross traffic. Policy 5.3 Ensure the accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly and disabled. 4 Policy 5.4 Provide a comprehensive network of multi-use trails and bikeways between residential areas and commercial/employment activity centers, public institutions, and recreation areas. Policy 5.6 Encourage the provision of facilities that support carpooling and public transportation within the City. Open Space/Conservation Element Policy 2.1 Coordinate with the Riverside County Flood Control District to design flood control improvements that preserve, to the maximum extent feasible, important natural features and resources of the local creeks and riparian forest of the Santa Margarita River. Policy 5.1 Conserve the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in the Sphere of Influence, and other important landforms and historic landscape features through the development review process. Policy 8.1 Provide a Citywide recreation system that connects to the County's regional trail system which provides for bicycling, equestrian, hiking, and jogging trails with appropriate support facilities. Policy 8.5 Develop trails and sidewalks suitable for multiple users, including for the physically disabled and for personal transportation alternatives. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Policy 1.7 Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development and protect and enhance quality of life. Policy 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occurs in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. Policy 5.4 Explore opportunities to expand and provide additional community meeting space. Policy 5.5 Encourage provision of cultural facilities within the community, including museums, theaters, arts center, a performing arts center, special exhibitions, an outdoor amphitheater, and public art. Policy 5.7 Provide library facilities and services for educational, cultural, and recreational purposes. Policy 7.1 Work with the Riverside County Flood Control District and other agencies involved with Murrieta Creek flood control improvements to implement a solution that maximizes retention of natural resources and provision of recreation opportunities along the Creek. 5 Public Safety Element Policy 3.1 Ensure adequate facilities and police and fire service personnel are provided in the City. Community Design Element Policy 1.1 Develop a comprehensive system of trails and open space areas connecting schools, public recreation areas, residential areas, and commercial centers. Policy 1.4 Promote community identity by providing specially designed gateway signs and landscape enhancements at the primary entrances to the City. Policy 4.1 Promote the development of a continuous sidewalk and trail system throughout the City. Policy 6.4 Promote use of public art in public spaces, specifically open space areas and entry points throughout the City. Policy 7.6 Promote the provision of cultural facilities within the community including: art museums, theaters, performing art centers, outdoor amphitheaters, special cultural exhibitions, and public art. Air Quality Element Policy 3.4 Establish a convenient and efficient system of bicycle routes and pedestrian walkways. Policy 4.1 Encourage community-wide reduction in energy consumption through conservation. Economic Development Policy 2.5 Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality goods and services for resident, workers and tourists, including apparel general merchandise, home furnishings and appliances. Policy 3.4 Take advantage of Temecula's regional capture of taxable sales and continue to establish Temecula as a retail center. Parks and Recreation Projects The Fiscal Year 2015-19 CIP contains nine Parks and Recreation Projects. The Parks and Recreation Projects consist of maintenance or enhancements to existing parks and recreation facilities. The Parks and Recreation Projects are as follows: • Children's Museum Enhancement Project • Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair • Park Improvement Program • Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement 6 • Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing • Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal and Desilting Pond • Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement • Senior Citizen Outdoor Fitness Lot • Special Needs Playground Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that these projects are consistent with provisions of the Open Space/Conservation, Community Design, Growth Management/Public Facilities, and Air Quality Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the Parks and Recreation Projects and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Open Space/Conservation Element Policy 1.7 Consider the establishment of special use parks for seniors, pets, etc. Community Design Element Policy 3.1 Improve the appearance of neighborhood areas and neighborhood edges through landscaping, location of open space buffers, and special landscape features. Policy 7.6 Promote provision of cultural facilities within the community including: art museums, theaters, performing art centers, outdoor amphitheaters, special cultural exhibitions, and public art. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element Policy 1.7 Guide the timing and provision of facilities and services to support development and protect and enhance quality of life. Policy 4.6 Plan for the joint use of school/municipal facilities wherever feasible and desirable, including: school grounds, buildings, City parks, multi-purpose buildings, and recreation facilities. Policy 6.4 Coordinate with the wastewater district to make reclaimed water available for irrigation purposes in the City. Air Quality Element Policy 4.1 Encourage community-wide reduction in energy consumption through conservation. 7 Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Projects/Housing The Fiscal Year 2015-19 CIP contains one Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) Project. The SARDA Project focuses on improving affordable housing opportunities within the City. The SARDA Project is: • Affordable Housing Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that this project is consistent with the provisions of the Land Use and Housing Elements of the adopted General Plan. A review of the General Plan did not identify any goals or policies that provided contrary policy direction or that indicated an inconsistency between the SARDA Project and the adopted General Plan. The specific examples demonstrating consistency are listed below. Land Use Element Policy 1.7 Pursue opportunities to locate higher density housing with supporting commercial and public uses west of 1-15. Policy 7.1 Encourage revitalization of Old Town through implementation of the Old Town Specific Plan. Housing Element Policy 1.2 Encourage residential development that provides a range of housing types in terms of cost, density and type, and provides the opportunity for local residents to live and work in the same community by balancing jobs and housing types. Policy 1.6 Encourage the development of compatible mixed-use projects that promote and enhance the village concept, facilitate the efficient use of public facilities, and support alternative transit options. Policy 2.1 Promote a variety of housing opportunities that accommodate the needs of all income levels of the population, and provide opportunities to meet the City's fair share of Low and Moderate Income housing. Policy 2.2 Support innovative public, private and nonprofit efforts in the development of affordable housing, particularly for special needs groups. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS No legal notice to the public is required for the Planning Commission's review and conformity finding of the proposed Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with Title 14 California Code of Regulations. The Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15738(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does 8 not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. The Planning Commission's review and determination that the Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. ATTACHMENTS Proposed Fiscal Year 2015-19 Capital Improvement Program 9 Capital Improvement Program c7"'-e:"-e.641' Fiscal Years 2015-19 CIRCULATION PROJECTS Table of Contents Abbott Corporation Roadway Improvements Butterfield Stage Road Extension Diaz Road Widening Flashing Beacons and Speed Advisory Signs French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase I French Valley Parkway / Interstate-15 Over-Crossing and Interchange Improvements - Phase'll Illuminated Street Name Sign Replacement Program-Citywide Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange Medians and Parkways-Citywide Murrieta Creek Bridge and Overland Drive Extension to Diaz Road Pavement Rehabilitation Program—Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Program—Winchester Road Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement Program — Citywide Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide Traffic Signal Interconnect Equipment Installation Western Bypass Bridge Over Murrieta Creek ABBOTT CORPORATION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Location •- k- : . -,, "M" 111 I: X -"---._l'-"t(:. -. , -':'",! :•-• :I ii ' -.1 ' ' . - ': •''''" ."W,41,1 - '''-.% 1,1.) • • - rir. Ir--" ..( : : ,„' 11.0104P/P;_.". • I K. :r----.1•4„/' ' • '.:---.'"fi ".•'.31:. . ...- . . . . . . 4 / ..' 1', ''"- ' ' •'--"oi',,.. - t. "4.." ""'. .''' \ '.." '; ' •... : '.'; - - ...- - ......, , , f ‘,4"1, 'Ct:' , ' ,,,-- :'y. \i40 •\'.,;',7 :,s' -,------ ..,.-';',/ j'' ',., ''.. - / •; .:,:--...':.-.1 .Yi Il■ ti4. ' , __,• "VI. or ".,..,. k, ' ".'.', '-',' • ' o'•.1k ''4.\--f ''' .eie 'O,..-4.',0.,:-- I. '-' ■ .1$1*" ;10•, -1 ' •(4"." ' ° •4/4., •" ' -' 1 ' ''›..„,...e.--, t, -r ,. MALL La•.. -,:k i A • ' •O ' Q . i4 0 70: E..09:or't-.,c0,0, •"N.O W.4 O0,0O_D 1 eplf,piP! t •.'' ..,,,ft ig . ‘,.,.. r -' , -1 :i".('''.AvtE*". "Alli.1,Tror tt , ,•t,._.. .. • , CA a- ' '''' : ••' • C ' 4.$,_ ,44#401,10° _ 4,1.11,ifl 1,0 L , ... --ii 1 if . ,op , , _ ,,,, - 4 , cr 1, 0:: '',... f 1 t , lb 1 ,, - - p.40, - 1 • . Ado.- 4'0 0,,...ii, • „...,.,-,o, ,:e...„ ,, • HI.COLE "" c 1 -0,0 i,'., '1 , .-. ' . ,4pie r.,..... ,‘., tl r oo• 000 DAW 1 i '411*I'd7015' . . t4CREST UJCI'l:'- , 11" NI1111\111 ,,,,,,,,111 '114 i••• ST < z \ Sie • 40`'‘'''' 'a'•1 1i ' liksok, L I -. •,. •14..- - ' V.,,,,,,,' ' ritr 46.:: :../. . '' 7., ■.,ki,,...:-1L ' l'..,76":"115::::11. ,..''-:.'- 'i' 4 I . 1.11‘ ''S THOAAAS w . a "'''s'' Ali- -.,c- ' _. . 444 t■' e . Alk,11 1..111, . , 7• "P . # -• --- V1041,". at,VI . pi\ ,, .0. vo00 . '. '10"„ OP'.6. ., .■ ...if Ili ..t, 111110 . dik-4C4le'All•- tn, 4 ;,4,. , , ., ,••■ (,,,4•• 4,j,,, r" Vir • • II , , • ..., .. ,, I / , , 1.. .,...n.T.o.,. _•,,, C"1/.,,,4,,,7+4?: ' 'A( '''' D'C' III • *.V. .4,.. , ••ilio, .. or>. . .,.,,•, % :. 1,vt ..., :... --:,, v.... 4 f.,1,---'•' . , i' ' _,!,., ' -r.,-_-_ 'n'".-.', --'---',‘. - /1" - -. _ , ' .,- ,- 'Iry *,. ' , :,/.t ', Ilt.*•..i.i1- ,,. ,r,,,. / ,.' ,,, -- „ .::..,.,: ,...:, ...„,.-.....:,,•.,*.,.-•..\ 4 I'• , ..l 4. IV '',. \ . "r :-. -.AY '' / r . . 1.:,.1■..4. 11111 ,r'•... . .., .'.. 'I. \ ',';,." -''•'-0'.;,e..1 ,i. 1. 10. ....,,,,.:,,, ,, itt.411,11, irk! ..-,,i,.1. -.-.•„ . . . , . ) „4,..4..„ , __ __.... 0'• ‘ '''';.k.. 4\010 .....• . , . . '0e, 17:3 ., __ , '0 1 0 • ;0- ;,.,,, 0;•''...1-7-'-'7:f •' '•.,,, ',Ve ,_ . ,, / 4. A'ks, . . ',7, .,,O., , -•Ik, k 1, . , °•0 c..9- ' k', k\ k...:', -- ' \ . , .. ...-, _. _ • - .. . •,. t... ilk-Soil Aerial Data-March 2010 Feet 520 1,040 A a,, : ./ Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 5Pub` ABBOTT CORPORATION ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS Circulation Project Protect Description: This project includes the design and construction of roadway improvements on Motor Car Parkway, Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Solana Way. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation on Motor Car Parkway, Ynez Road, Margarita Road, and Solana Way. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and Economic Prosperity. Protect Status: This project has not yet started. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.620 Level: II BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Circulation Project Location :: Li - U.11 Lo Cie-". -...•_rlur s. _ _ —,moirrrsai :0 C C e 3 I 1_1'11.1/ 8 0 al "INGs RD '' ftLLui g w 43&g 0 1-- — I I ti) _CAMINO CIELO ik , , .4-4 7 I ) co c1,7 r'L r- LIEF g , z ER,90 -Y. 4 tgiE — I- ca —, .i1/ ' \___ ..„,,,,,----r,-, , -/-- . '44. G...--''''' '''''''''''----°i4VP "-.4 Iet c• i. -,‘ , f• • 411) -10,1401 fr \I .._..„-"-----'-- .Nri' >lit 6:• . e.- - , . -...4,......... ,I.1 -: i i ■ lc y4;111" -- 1 1 i W .i ,_• ' :I( -4110 .--_.-• _ .---„__ -,---literi. ...-, 1 .z . W••°I A *4 i - SOUTH LOOP RD 1055 _--"`-'----- CA LLE GIRASOL of TIRIIIVD1 • , -1' I • , ... 0 0 g... t XI ft- igi a..... , 3 ' - i- t ' 0 N1-41 .114-.-"jr-71:l: it4b 44f Ce i-1 ..i. 4r - " t z ..) ... ..„,:„. eh, 'lit 4,41,„^%-,.,. .-.■:Ir.' R.rib l''' Li' ("1 10 VISTA DEL MONTE .-- 4,04 10...„11.Le 0 c ...1, 410N,j6.1v ,,, .14. RE TOozA KAREN " •/1‘ CI .. J , -_ '0 i f 1)00— GbL, -•- - .. ■ -. ,, , RD z T. . . LN 4.4 ,6....." •.,A .,393' , , RE), IIIM •'2* !'"'",,..._--..,...,... _ __----i-1. V) 1.1•1 ''• 1 .P1S\ tf•.-• CT .f$ .< <5 0 „so - p..? z rt: .. 4 ' k' -.? . 5 tx 0 tp - 4„ .r.. c..,r,$ kpit ,_ ..k- _ • ir.., . -,---- - -- - --. - y 014 SI ----- —C,Ck-Sikti ‘4.0AVIE P' P' RD LIDAIve ci ilt IC; \;°'" •.-f ____ —- ___ , -.... - s Cr 14 , . , ... . - --- ,. • ° L, 4. .- . -.0 co c 1G .- -,1- : ' " *!. r • ?. 4,4.Q 743.' 4 4 4 4 ., , 4,Qtre ...- _ ,f1 =' — ----- i Aerial Data-March 2010 0 512 5 1,025 2,050 ..__ c,, r . Proposed Capital Improvement Program st "Itil"Yoctio,"" Fiscal Years 2015-19 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD EXTENSION Circulation Project Prolect Description: This project includes the complete design and construction of four lanes on Butterfield Stage Road (from Rancho California Road to Murrieta Hot Springs Road),four lanes on Murrieta Hot Springs Road (from Butterfield Stage Road to the City limits), and two lanes on Calle Chapos (from Butterfield Stage Road to Walcott Road),totaling approximately 3.2 miles of road. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing a crucial north and south arterial road on the eastern side of the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Phase II of this project is under construction and is anticipated to be completed by FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.723 Level: DIAZ ROAD WIDENING Circulation Project Location 90 • r1Q Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 "aliTgjj' 2c5ras DIAZ ROAD WIDENING Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes widening of Diaz Road to four lanes (from two), completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk and a landscaped median from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important north and south arterial road on the west side of the City and completes a portion of the designated Western Bypass. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The design will start in FY2016-17. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165 Level: FLASHING BEACONS AND SPEED ADVISORY SIGNS Circulation Pro Ject Location v = Proposed Capital Improvement Program �-• Fiscal Years 2015-19 SP"FLASHING BEACONS AND SPEED ADVISORY SIGNS Circulation Project Project Description: This project maintains the City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program by installing flashing beacons and/or speed advisory signs at school sites and neighborhoods. This project includes solar powered panels, chargeable batteries, and programmable timers to advise motorists of the school zone and residential speed limits. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic safety in neighborhoods and school zones. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The installation of flashing beacons and LED speed limit display signs are ongoing. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.670 Level: FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/ INTERSTATE-15 OVER-CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE I Circulation Project Location ' . , . ‘ k II"'" .7 'AO". . ' -L''',..,:ifit • r4 1-i- •it • • ' `'....(e4-kt,. . , ih. • ..141Ntaralr, - gyp, • �� -,.� 4 it rc C., 1., . ,, y C> :. r. 64 :,... v13 d4k y :s.C.1 7 'j.. r 4 : '4 Q. 4u, { � d ©O \d f 1 "fir i:`. — j,' J' ' 14y, y 6 . ' '1s ' �QQ� do c 'P� y■.w,. Ihrlielli _ i I,, Aerial Data-March 2010 I 250 500 A 1,000et v' / Proposed Capital Improvement Program l Fiscal Years 2015-19 FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/ INTERSTATE 15 OVER-CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS—PHASE I Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and construction activities to portions of the French Valley Parkway and Interstate 15 over-crossing and interchange. The project will add a new southbound off-ramp from Interstate 15 to French Valley Parkway, construct the northern half of French Valley Parkway from the off-ramp to Jefferson Avenue, widen the existing southbound off-ramp from Interstate 15 to Winchester,and construct a new auxiliary lane between French Valley Parkway and the Winchester Road southbound off-ramp. Other features include permanent and temporary retaining walls, erosion control and irrigation, and a new traffic signal and roadway improvements at the intersection of French Valley Parkway and Jefferson Avenue. The project requires oversight by Caltrans and coordination with the City of Murrieta. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by providing another southbound off-ramp from Interstate 15 and adds a lane to the Interstate 15 southbound off-ramp to Winchester. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Construction is estimated to be completed by June 2014 with landscape establishment continuing through fiscal year 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No.210.165.719 Level: FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/ INTERSTATE-15 OVER-CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Location _ — y► A MURRVET4 if � INIIki d,4.. ,� �� RfgrC d 1� p MILLE ( ' ;r% °°,00( 'il'*CP4.4)1. ' :'''7.-4°. :: .1. *-:-4:;4''1,..........„111, . , z. 0 .,.. .., a 0 '', - 469 p e tf,4 '! Sr OO CI v yC \.*x / v F4 Gt. O S (k' , i , ,p � R EA CHE p? 14, qv OGT o Ct fl" co k / ti0 1CT 1,. \\ .: , G L�r � y • Col, s , yb . ...�` Ate° i r y .94, " S rits4.:: ..,..„,,,,, '4 v •�•. ' ''j' tap yf° C 111k r" Cr °'O . 0 1, ,r 0 RO ?Y'OR fy 4G tt�' COQ¢ �'��`� aR +0 O I 'P� 04 rrc, 15 r, --s, a+v r4, ,,. CI 0 9k � iA ,C G GOk�a .G 4 , - `: •0''i , .,47 fi. . r• 11: ‘t......• z '\ r OA r - / •• - --:. v.. 4,0 . 4' 0,144,, Feet Aerial Data-March 2010 61410 0 800 1,600 3,200 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY/ INTERSTATE-15 OVER-CROSSING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS—PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a bridge over-crossing over Interstate 15 from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road,including curb and gutters,pavement,sidewalks,and new traffic signals. Benefit / Core Value: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing a full service interchange from Interstatel5 with on and off ramps in both directions. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The design is estimated to be completed in fiscal year 2014-15. Construction will be completed in future years,when funding is available. Department: Public Works—Account No.210.165.726 Level: ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM-CMINIDE Circulation Project Location 90 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 ILLUMINATED STREET NAME SIGN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM—CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the conversion of existing Internally Illuminated Street Name Signs (IISNS) from fluorescent tubes to an energy efficient Light Emitting Diode (LED) tube, and conversion and replace- ment of deficient IISNS frames and panels. In most cases,the existing frame and sign panels will be re-used. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a reduction in energy consumption and costs, and supports the long- term maintenance and rehabilitation of City assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and a Sustainable City. Project Status: This is a new project and it has not started. Department: Public Works—Account No.210.165. Level: II INTERSTATE-15/ HIGHWAY 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE Circulation Project Location ' \ ' ' I\ " -,_ /. kjart • )1.6-- ' , •••ie \ , s. 7.1 ,16,10. N44 A I .,. , , ,,r c \l, 1, ,, n.. ill ..,_,.,,LiiiLc,*....000001.N. 1011 a k,\ a V ,•t- '', , c• ' . *.ir ., 1 4 , I 'I ilk .. , , k, , -- Ilk ] " ; .- ,--„,-..- ,,,, 1 , ,-„,•-„er,,,illii - 0•` ', 1 0. ■. . 1k .', ' ....„,'-:,,,t" I 0.... .,,,,-1. ; '•,,P.- . t.' ' r*. , . _ -,`,. q II\ ir, • ,, . ,- an ir •, # iiit, 14 l''°\ 1 ' 1 i 1-•." t\ '', " 7:" - .f '4°-. ' ,'0 ' 't •. \ Ve• ' \ •' ''''. • '. e.t:IPPr v . ..._ ''41 1, ',. 4 Ifr e:• -A N f' ': 11.1 \ l ' . 4 II, :, - . N. \ ''' .0 1 - Nt, \ ''.''. , . ii Ii .. 4 2.4 . . g ..,.. g , .. tg j` 11114, ;',.' •--- 7-r. , s., z- . .. ,-., - -., ' ',' ft. ' " • i •. - , 41* , • ..- ''' „. '''- , '',.., 41001. , V4IN7-,..4;,■:e.:4141 4.., -,..4 . . , J 1 411Pn P-- ... .., -(--r.',' ' , ...,‘,. - ,ks,-- - ' 4140-e/(All ott ,, ,k i , -1, I. or - - r'''? \\Ii, at." ' ' - . • k . -- ,... ) " Pr, , jai `i, • . f'1,* ...1; ,,./.. ,,..... . 1. - 1 ' •• • _ _ .- ....4.6.. i ..r. . 1- ... - - — - • ,01....... I Feet 16hriiiii Aerial Data-March 2010 0 265 530 1.060 ...... " '- Proposed Capital Improvement Program 2 Fiscal Years 2015-19 INTERSTATE-15 / STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH ULTIMATE INTERCHANGE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes right-of-way acquisition, design, and construction of a ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway/State Route 79 South. The interchange will accommodate traffic generated by future development of the City's General Plan land use as well as regional traffic volume increases forecasted for the year 2037. This project is crucial, as the projected traffic volume increases currently exceed the capacity of the existing interchange improvements constructed by the Riverside County Transportation Department. Benefit / Core Value: This project will improve circulation, freeway access, and level of service at the Interstate 15 and Temecula Parkway/State Route 79 South intersection. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The plans, specifications, and estimates package are currently being prepared for review by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Acquisition was completed during FY 2013-14. Construction is scheduled to start during Fiscal Year 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.662 Level: MEDIANS AND PARKWAYS—CITYWIDE Circulation Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program 2 jaw Fiscal Years 2015-19 ,osws MEDIANS AND PARKWAYS—CITYWIDE Circulation Project Protect Description: Pursuant to the Conditions of Approval, this project completes the missing portions of the raised landscaped median island on Rancho California Road between Moraga Road to Lyndie Lane, Ynez Road from Tierra Vista Road to Rancho California Road, from Date Street to City boundary, Butterfield Stage Road from 750 feet south of La Serena Way to Chemin Clinet and Butterfield Stage Road from 1,110 feet south of Calle Chapos to 1,200 feet north of La Serena Road. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by eliminating potential conflicts between left turn movements and through traffic on circulation element streets with a classification of major arterial or higher. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: This project will reimburse developers for eligible improvements upon project completion. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.622 Level: Ill MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AND OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION TO DIAZ ROAD Circulation Project Location r e : 10• ,, ; ./1/ / : 1.1, . 1 " ., ' ^iii, r'. . il 1(141711i. 0 ';„,t.„ .'''' \\,,s,s>.'). ' :\ 4P: 9. - 'N <\:` . ''. .- \fr' -. :',./.0. '. \ ''`•% '''.; •••=, — , %. .. . •■ A. ,, . . . . . „_, . . , , — ,_ ,.;,,,__., , , . , ,... .. ,,,,..„.. ,, ,, ,,,,. ..... ‘ ., ,..., .„.0 .,, . . ... , ,. ny±. , . :., .,_, ...„_ . . .,..--, to. .. ---,,... / .. , 1 ....„ , , ,, ,,,,,. A 1 , . • ,:.-. .. ...., ,, ., i,...., ,.... , . . .., .. , . .: , .. . „.• .. ,,,,, ., ...„....-...... . . , . .. ... t- . _ - i !�A ! f . + rte �3' ' f* '.. WI, , <\\\ . - • r34 d° S/J � J / .%' a LL. S 4 y `, 1. ' FR- . A''. 4 fit.' G r c7?-:.II.-.11`., trig') Feet ,,,,, Aerial Data-March 2010 0 137.5 275 550 CV4"-C*1--- 6( Kilitillirilliir Proposed Capital Improvement Program 4161Var'" Fiscal Years 2015-19 MURRIETA CREEK BRIDGE AND OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION TO DIAZ ROAD Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. This project also includes studying suitable locations for a new crossing, environmental studies, mitigation, acquisition of right-of-way, new road improvements between Murrieta Creek and Commerce Center Drive, and installation of new traffic signals at Overland Drive intersections with Diaz Road, Enterprise Circle West, and Commerce Center Drive. This project will be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will construct the street improvements between Commerce Center Drive and Enterprise Circle West, and Phase 2 will connect Enterprise Circle West and Diaz Road, including the construction of the bridge over Murrieta Creek. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation and access to Overland Drive freeway over-crossing. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The design for the extension of Overland Drive from Commerce Center Drive is complete. The City is working on the right-of-way acquisition and the environmental document. Construction of Phase 1 is scheduled to be completed in FY 2014-15 and Phase 2 will be completed in future years when funding is available. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.602 Level: PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM-CITYWIDE circulation: Location 90 ., _ ', Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 (5 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM—CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and reconstruction of major streets as recommended in the Pavement Management System. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status:, A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Installations are completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.655 Level: PAVEMENT REHABILITION PROGRAM -WINCHESTER ROAD Circulation Project Location li °all r.glit(r , 0 414.41 . .11 4 1 401 1 ",:: " -,,•# . . < ! Ai* i -- -=.1.- •- I'i seoRa-A 17'14414ft' a 1 .' \ i 21110"1". --A e J . ,, . _ dilk r t .Iv ti --- ...-_ 04 ‹ ::11 7.:i 7 y r ,k I A 0 _.,,•4 _ l', 11 it i '1',1 1 . ' .A 1',l'o ..k... ' . $ , -. ' 1 $'••J - L' lb v ' , , . - ami •V P.7\ tido or-,• - ' It:-,- . .• . 1 _,. i i: ',t, -,., ,- • c:1,,; . i i:,.; i, ,r-615S-__ : .,.- L3., too'. /tit..\ .z. . 4 r ,•,-,..,0,,. , v. 4" ' ..."...,, '-f „ ..- ' --• • . ,,_...... , - , , -, . -• . -; ' it - - ! u. or'r t r - .• ■• - I l' 1 r • -I - , err.si • ' fr ' . ' C' h. 1‘.1. f, !iler` -1. , , 't! j'1 1 ip .. . . , i -. lr:, - * W \ iii r II. 4,t i ■ - - . ' . - .,. ik.''' 1,: ' 404.1V44.1*44, I MIS " — WI fi 1TER-RD - mi _. - —_— :.._.... . ...... I..'" 4 Niti444. ..' 1 -."'4 ..i.p...-444.,,. -- --., ,. 5A, • . , . „.._ ,v --- ) . r,./ ' -4...,.'$: #.4 '!. i'‘,. t ,.rittt- • i.. .! L ,,.• „ // //// .• , A . fr R • if 1 j - fr . 1 1-, ,. i ti_' .■,. t A 1 s..44^Iv a 1..... / '1 • • -'• "i :4,, ^1" , 1 ' .0%. , 'I'' ' r V Ibilail:1 .: .1#:".' C.:11.1:71,rjorALVA'll'i ' PA'Rt..°'LiVig N:t:Niltblil?".4:611: • t- .4 4 7,,,,I,. ,4 I .sp, I,i 1 , , ,, . am.' • . #:. • I ' ... 11,4 VI%'il • ......N., I 4111,1■!Ii: ''1,3 rr,-.ATI;ca•-f-r .Mit NI :Ivo, - °. er,..lalia i i --____- • • -,) `114*.a ,,,4i-w -- 1, . ., , 4 --- le,. '1-. __..fi i• • ell; , ..._ • p ----_,,_,_ i $41 • -0,1i. e r .4 j, . • i vv ., ,, , 1 1 ,,. , r • ,P 4, -- --• r,t,6 "CY,. '''''. ,4.}I J . .,- i , i — - 'it dr., ' ,r•.. 1 4. .•- T.r. • ,. , . __ -^ . - .., ''' a' , ..• 1,..„ .. . "•L.,. ''...__. . \1 I ' . ' • ' " 7- 7 411. ' . • rl , - e, : : • ' - 1 iitilint tcf '' ^ '."' 1 • . ar i. I. f Aerial Data-March:010 , 1 * 1 "!1111_111-10 110 ' tr.*, _,t '-'6---2-`t'-'- --... hi li ,, „Rreiv D- f• ' '', 1r, a.c udiatis [Feet 0 200 4." it: '.leikl°P1!1:744.?* -e.61'el. l' 400 800 Proposed Capital Improvement Program cr Fiscal Years 2015-19 41-44"125"wm PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM—WINCHESTER ROAD Circulation Project Prolect Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and reconstruction of Winchester Road, from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, as recommended in the Pavement Management System. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: Construction will be completed in FY 14-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.650 Level: I TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM— CITYWIDE Circulation Project Location ( ( Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 C, - - TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROGRAM — CITYWIDE Circulation Project Protect Description: This project includes the replacement and upgrade of existing traffic signal equipment, including battery back-up systems, LED traffic signal indications, traffic signal controller cabinets, service cabinets, safety street lighting, illuminated street name signs, traffic signal controllers, signal communication equipment, and closed circuit television (CCTV) camera equipment. Benefit / Core Value: This project enhances traffic safety and supports the long-term maintenance and rehabilitation of City assets and infrastructure. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Protect Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Replacements are completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.680 Level: Proposed Capital Improvement Program m,� �j Fiscal Years 2015-19 fJ -- TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION—CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, and installation of traffic signals at various locations throughout the City including: Rancho California Road,; Ynez Road; Butterfield Stage Road; Meadows Parkway; Winchester Road; and Redhawk Community. The project also include reim- bursement for developers installed traffic signals. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: A priority list of traffic signals has been developed. The traffic signals scheduled for installation will be designed and constructed in the scheduled fiscal year. Reimbursements for developers installed traffic signals will be made as Development Impact Fee (DIF)traffic become available. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.682 Level: I TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION Circulation Project Location LINKS C;\ HC 47),0. * 3 �, Cr Y 'CO 0 gill ' { cFtYS O'0Rer c'-1` c �^,V1's � fit+ car IUIp �rE� d`'1 ' r r 1 I -f a(PZ' G0 .,C'° ' •_ •..• Is t y- I' • v• Gflge ANA co-os. co.. TUNAS 0' r �tm '4 � r ' ' L`ALI e P" G(7t1 7- J� C{Xi` OM Cos ARROYO` :.tr Opit 11.00 y�slp RO 1! . 50,01 ERNc -- . p5 ' 0, -Y, 1' • ^ ,, ate] �. �.• . , ° - ''' r i f -' i o r ot� { L M 1'y a . '���y � .,401-A 1'�0i* "R%.-t1<IC'' Glx Cpf�SA �T 4 ' "' e` ++ Gfl�fl,.y C RASCO A °'' Cu"C r Sy AvAtr F• " J► 1 4 ir 9 t, �,-M1 _ .jy -" ' 0`—Jr I— let O S/7 . ' < s 4 Q it ' s: flQ ir0 •.j 6- e U ' ' e ,le f _ 403 pv". �(4- @ �, 0 oR'tE PRIE,G0 t'� <tr IR i - p99r - ZA 6, 1 0'9ENp14 r _ Lii . t ,"'.` ;t41--,717-1' . " ; Avw+-o 0 , �, / O .:A+ -0 c 9'• r i ;+±0�!y °�```tz. , SAco cC �, 4 yl.t4,,e .,„, .. ... , ....„140 4,1,4, o 'ESC Po 'C,4 a per¢ , , ,,.rr,• i Feet Aerial Data-March 2010 0 500 1,000 2,000 Proposed Capital Improvement Program it Fiscal Years 2015-19 TRAFFIC SIGNAL INTERCONNECT EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION Circulation Project Project Description: This project consists of installing conduit and fiber optic cable to interconnect traffic signals and closed circuit television (CCTV) communication on various roadways to complete missing links and develop a redundant network. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves circulation by connecting several existing and future signals to the existing traffic operations center to allow for remote monitoring and trouble shooting. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The first phase of installation of traffic signal interconnect equipment has been completed. Additional funding is required to complete this project. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.712 Level: II WESTERN BYPASS BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK Circulation Project Location - ec- , ,•1111 :::1 -- , '771 ,, . -iloo.'7 ' '-• • ' '. _ i ' ' — . . , ' t rt 1 4 ,,.... . t ii. ,,. ,,,r, _ . , ,, 4_:,„:. ,.k..t.k_.,„fe...,"7• 1‘1; 40t- . , 0 le. ''''', . '" • r - , V * ' '''' . • N ,I, -, ' ,_ .„ . . ••,• . k: , ' '4. . , 4: ., ,,, ,.. , • - ., -• • , • A. ..-- .: . . ., - • , 4 . ,\-I,' , t ,- . ." ., , . -1: • 1 - --`•,--- • . ,., • . tv; • --- ow" ...", .,:,. . 4, , • • : •••••:.. s ,.. ..• ilk, ,•••. ... . ., 4V. •,..„. • . ft i . - :Y: •-,,,,' 1 • - i'e kiiir, -••• 10,i, . W .4., • ., .: - 7 ' - —,,,It ., ., _ , ... t . ,._ r „AI,, . . ,.. . • , .,, .0 • . • ..,. :. ... , It !e-..: ' --.-- • • ... ... , ' t . , ,L..„.., , .•...,„ow. t .,., , • . A ..,.;I,- ... * ,- :* \' •"'-'' 1 A..--_,1*--.....‘;,:lf. . ; •;i1-1 i,, .,1 ■.1' .. rip.-4--.,dii:-..•• ‘.',' .'"* * '.: t' • ":11/4‘• ' ''` , . . .''1':: ■ 4.. . '11 4;' 1111''';':*'1, '• '' .., ''.4,1''''' ' . , II • 44,1 i ! , ai - ' '. I lir •• ..,ii, • ,1 .• iwt• • 1,- • „ 7 k. '''.. k ''' . ' 'N _...._. . •.97. , - tict...„2„/„. \ . \ - . , IL,, ...., / . 4' '' ' H ;,'0 .1.- ' 6 1.1 . ,• r • ' ' r •. ' ‘ • , , .,_ Pd I \ i'■: 4 ': ';‘,1_ ' ,. e t; 4,11. • * - ' r J.,.. 1, . t r , - , ,,_ • r',t A 4' . . • ,•••• • • ., • • _ - ' ... . . ' ... - . ...... ...' - 1. ict . • ,,, . • I ...., ••• .S■ ,) . f 4. .0 I ,.., . .. • vi. , .,.. . *9 ito_k•-.,„ .. , .,,.,,„ 0,4•4- , ' ... -....,,,,..„; Teet 0 125 250 600 MP Aerial Data-March 2010 . ,: -0 , Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 414"2"g''.251it"kg ._._.I WESTERN BYPASS BRIDGE OVER MURRIETA CREEK Circulation Project Prolect Description: This project includes construction of a new bridge over Murrieta Creek at the future Western Bypass corridor and Temecula Parkway. It also includes finalizing and updating the existing bridge design, constructing the new bridge and approach roadways, curb and gutters, sidewalks, storm drain facilities, and environmental studies and mitigation. The completed project will tie the southern leg of the future Western Bypass corridor and will meet the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Murrieta Creek Improvement Project needs. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves traffic safety and circulation. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Protect Status: The design is complete. Construction is contingent upon the developer's participation and the appropriation of the required additional funds. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.660 Level: II YNEZ ROAD WIDENING Circulation Project Location 90 ;4 ri D, / Proposed Capital Improvement Program 5. Fiscal Years 2015-19 YNEZ ROAD WIDENING Circulation Project Prolect Description: This project includes widening of Ynez Road to four lanes (from two), completion of missing segments of curb &gutter, sidewalk and a landscaped median from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street. Benefit/Core Value: This project improves traffic circulation by widening an important arterial road in this part of the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Proiect Status: This project has not yet started. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165. Level: II rt Capital Improl emeut. Program Fiscal Years 2015-10 tC7e-17:-.4(141 INFRASTRUCTURE / OTHER PROJECTS Table of Contents Bike Lane and Trail Program City Facilities Rehabilitation Citywide Sidewalks Citywide Storm Drain Improvements Citywide Surveillance Cameras Consolidate and Update Evaluation of Disabled Access To City Facilities and Programs Developer Reimbursements Facility Improvements/ Enhancements / Expansions Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade Fire Station Roripaugh Ranch Site— Phase II Library Parking - Phase II Medians and Ornamental Pedestrian Barriers-Citywide Murrieta Creek Improvements Old Town Sidewalk Rehabilitation Open Space Acquisition Program Pauba Road Sidewalks Pechanga Parkway Environmental Mitigation Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian / Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect Teen Center Temecula Park and Ride Theater Remediation YMCA Repair and Remediation BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM Infrastructure/Other Project Location 4 r r � , N. IP Oa \ ii■ -i ''' . Ai Ile/111141/4 - L 4 �. ,.. ..,/ )'.,,.._, ,, i k____ 4., .4, VLD 14 . .r.)K1\ , ' 4 lii 0'mo° N ii fit * ,� *0.srrea • f vial ,`"{ /> s 7b Illr .ree .:2'. •F IP 1.* .. - , '.• to.. .•:-, it, ---/". t -- ,�: i1 �1 1 i ..,,)6; \\ 1 ter ' �. -( � ow its r 2 City of Temecula t Old Town to Wine Country Trail i9 fi EMI Lake Skinner Trail • _ Temecula Loop i w Existing Trails(Off Road) 11/ + t T� Proposed Trails(Off Road) I, V ♦ it 999 ` Bike Lane(Class II) l _____ -Striped on both sides ':t e Bike Lane(Class II) _ O- -Striped on one side; black side not striped ," ; ;•T ti I Bike Lane(Class II)Proposed p - 1 ft:44 Miles Aerial Data-March 2010 0 0.5 1 2 -..rim•— Proposed Capital Improvement Program 2 Fiscal Years 2015-19 = _ ._ BIKE LANE AND TRAIL PROGRAM Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes Phase II of the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. Phase I of the Master Plan Update included community workshops, a survey, and the creation of a dedicated interactive website and was completed in FY 2013-14. In Phase II, the consultant will use the information gathered during Phase I to produce a recommended ranking of potential trails and bikeways. The consultant will create trail and bikeway segment information sheets that detail constraints, solutions, surface types and widths, and estimated construction costs. The consultant will also provide recommendations for amenities, signage, and other items that will provide a safe and pleasant experience. Other work includes technical studies to negotiate access and maintenance agreements with utility districts. Additional funding for this project will be dedicated to the construction of the multi-use trails and bikeways, as recommended by the consultant and prioritized by the City Council and residents. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides alternative modes of transportation and increasing connectivity and accessibility to Old Town, Wine Country, and the City's many schools, parks, trails, and open space areas. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Sustainable City and Transportation Mobility& Connectivity. Project Status: Phase I of the Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan was completed in FY 2013-14. Phase II of this project is currently underway. Department: Planning/Public Works/Temecula Community Services-210.165.703 Level: CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION infrastructure/Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program 5"" Fiscal Years 2015-19 2: CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation projects at City owned and operated facilities such as the City Hall, Civic Center, Community Recreation Center, Field Operations Center, Escallier House & Barn, Harveston Center, Mary Phillips Senior Center, Mercantile Building, Old Town Parking Garage, Old Town Sixth Street Parking Lot, S.A.F.E., Temecula Children's Museum, Temecula Community Center, Temecula Public Library, Temecula Valley Museum, Temecula Wedding Chapel, pool and locker room at Temecula Elementary School, and Maintenance Facility. The rehabilitation could include, but not limited to, parking lot rehabilitation and light replacements, heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) upgrades, roof repairs, carpet replacement, cabinet re-facing/replacement, re-stucco, concrete repairs, and replacement of fences. Benefit / Core Value: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life of facilities, and upgrades aging facility components. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Values of Healthy and Livable City and A Safe and Prepared Community. Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitation of projects are completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.701 Level: CITYWIDE SIDEWALKS Infrastructure✓Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 CJ CITYWIDE SIDEWALKS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalks at various locations around the City. Benefit / Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and a Sustainable City. Project Status: A list of areas with no sidewalks will be compiled and prioritized. This project is ongoing. Department: Public Works-210.165.708 Level: I CITYWIDE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program .�,. 25"u Fiscal Years 2015-19 CITYWIDE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Project Protect Description: This project includes the design and construction of storm drain improvements on several streets that flood during storm events, as well as replacing the existing cross gutter at Old Town Front Street, north of Temecula Parkway. The storm drain improvements on Old Town Front Street will be constructed in conjunction with the Pavement Rehabilitation project. Benefit / Core Value: This project improves safety and circulation while maintaining the integrity of the streets during inclement weather. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The storm drain improvements on Old Town Front Street will be constructed during FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.715 Level: CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS Infrastructure/Other Prefect Location 90 - /'' Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 . A - CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: The Citywide Camera Surveillance system will be utilized by the City to support public safety, traffic management, and asset protection activities in service to its citizens. The City's goal for the system is to standardize and integrate existing and new video management systems to provide video technology to improve overall safety and security to the residents of the city. Benefit / Core Value: To protect property and life. This project provides Police the ability to perform virtual patrols, maximizing staff efficiency and resources. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City,A Safe and Prepared Community and A Sustainable City. Protect Status: This is a new project. Department: Information Technology—Account No. 210.165.711 Level: CONSOLIDATE AND UPDATE EVALUATION OF DISABLED ACCESS TO CITY FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS infrastructure/Other Projecaoottion 90 Proposed Capital Improvement Program d414"25" .-.. Fiscal Years 2015-19 CONSOLIDATE AND UPDATE EVALUATION OF DISABLED ACCESS TO CITY FACILTIES AND PROGRAMS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: Project will consolidate various site and program specific assessments of barriers preventing disabled access to City Facilities and Programs; project will identify public facilities and programs not previously analyzed, allow for public input in the development of a formal transition plan to prioritize removal of identified barriers over a reasonable period of time within a fiscally constrained frame- work. Benefit / Core Value: This project identifies barriers that preclude persons with any form of disability from accessing City facilities and programs. The project will develop a formal transition plan to remove such barriers over time allowing greater access to City facilities and programs. This project furthers the City's Core Values of a Safe and Prepared Community, as well as Accountable and Responsive City Government. Project Status: Project will commence in FY 2014-15 and will become an ongoing program. Department: Building Safety—Account No. 210.165.713 Level: DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS infrastructure!Other Project Location ( Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: The City has entered into agreements for two projects that involve the reimbursement of development fees. The first project, Roripaugh Ranch "Panhandle", will consist of approximately 500 residential units. Construction began in FY 2013-14. The City will reimburse development fees pursuant to the Sixth Operating Memorandum of the Recorded Development Agreement with Roripaugh Valley Restoration. The second project, a 50,000 square foot Mercedes Benz Dealership, began construction in April 2013, and opened in Spring 2014. The City will reimburse fees pursuant to the Fee Reimbursement Agreement with Jones/Blumenthal Temecula Real Property LLC, in May 2014. Benefit / Core Value: The first project, Roripaugh Ranch "Panhandle",satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. The second project, Mercedes Benz Dealership, will develop new and expanded commercial and business facilities, while expanding the City's tax base through increased property values and consumer spending. This project satisfies the City's Core Value of Economic Prosperity. Project Status: The reimbursement for Mercedes-Benz was completed in FY 2013-14. The reimburse- ment for Roripaugh Ranch is estimated to be paid by FY 2015-16. Department: Planning—210.165.763 Level: II FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS/ ENHANCEMENTS /EXPANSIONS infrastructure of Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program i'l(4474256"" Fiscal Years 2015-19 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS / ENHANCEMENTS/ EXPANSIONS Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project will explore opportunities to expand the City's ability to provide high quality services and recreational options to the community through actively monitoring solicitations for real estate and/or developed properties in close proximity to existing City facilities. This will facilitate economical expansion of these existing destinations. Benefit / Core Value: This project allows for additional or expansion of City amenities to serve the City's growing population. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Healthy and Livable City and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Project Status: This project will be on an ongoing basis. Department: Temecula Community Services/Public Works Level: III FIRE STATION 73 LIVING QUARTERS UPGRADE Infrastructure/Other Project Location . ,„„ ,,. . e ,. /1.1", . N. 4-i_-," • ea r. �r y. r ¢ �°r iv OCZ) 44V,„:-- + + - gin �$,/$rC J, fir % � ` r; } ,/ 4 T • /�lr� q er f i•} s Js"�.l4. / / f` . ix-4j ` ♦,1 f3. r .,', fi ` .� - .� t' ' e. , , ,., . ,,, 0 ., . :p. ,i 74,0. • -.44-.. ' < . i , -t, N. - .. ' \ y - ' (A -!.• — . ''',., ..,:\: i �. .. * :. 'may r. M ' Al. / • 41r r ' -- -4.. 4. s` its h4� , •� �. . ,� •r3- l u......A, , voie .. k �: r � F ]FOP • • % Feet Si ,.w1 Aerial Data-March 2010 0 100 200 400 r r` Proposed Capital Improvement Program • Fiscal Years 2015-19 FIRE STATION 73 LIVING QUARTERS UPGRADE Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project increases living, sleeping, and bathroom space to properly accommodate the number of staff working and living at the facility. This project will be phased as to not interrupt functionality of the current station. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) includes station furnishings, camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a health and safety benefit for the large number of personnel assigned to Fire Station 73. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community. Proiect Status: The design for this project will be completed in FY 2014-15 and construction will start when funding becomes available. Department: Fire—Account No. 210.165.757 Level: FIRE STATION RORIPAUGH RANCH SITE - PHASE II Infrastructure/Other Projects Location 4+ I 1 {I� ♦ F' !+94R 1, -•L ,—'•••=-- -.,/ -. - -�_ .— ter; I 1, fl 1 Or .,. _ •4 I '• CALLE CHAPOS —fix- I•-- "` SOUTH LOOP RD -If f r +. t . y f Fly : art 4 ANDREA CIR .fi � 1 1 , ` z r• .. '142-„` .y ..- • ._'- a •. .0 1‘ 1.7e4t I: 4.S.,."'' ..-" I II :.t 1. ,r ; fit`,'. yy - 4 per, i y t . o Feet ,,.. Aerial Data-March 2010 0 100 200 400 ...I wrp,fv / Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 FIRE STATION RORIPAUGH RANCH SITE—PHASE II Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: The acquisition, design, and construction of the fire station at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Calle Chapos is complete. Phase II will include installation and purchase of furniture, equipment and fixtures in order for the station to fully operate. Benefit / Core Value: The second phase of this project will provide the necessary furniture, equipment and fixtures needed in order for the Fire Station to fully operate. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community. Proiect Status: The construction for this project is complete. Phase II involves the purchase and installa- tion of furniture,fixtures and equipment. Department: Fire Services—Account No. 210.165.753 Level: II LIBRARY PARKING - PHASE II Infrastructure/Other Projects Location ''''IIII ) " .- : 1, ., , f.t ;Ir'Adit."1- I c: '.,.. '-.411.:, • k iir ' , ) 'i } , ie. !"•• cC.c' ' i. . 1 illi- Iv, _ , • 1 ' , . • 1, _ _ '`•r i r Apo ,_. ,,7-_,-- -,,_ : il`.:.: . ' ..- I 401 - , $� r ,t' 4L. .bra � yy • .� a, r F 1.:, ' 4 1 r iiiitt.,. . „. / ' ' i -9.." .1 ,.. :F-- Cyr ' " '- " + p r r x • • r . ` + . .,r .a -.1'., r-f ' At:101 004.474%. Feet tk �' Aerial Data-March 2010 0 100 200 400 �r� f Proposed Capital Improvement Program.7'2' - (, _ Fiscal Years 2015-19 re LIBRARY PARKING—PHASE II Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes the study, design, and construction of alternatives to provide additional parking for the Temecula Library. Phase II covers the design and construction of an expansion of the current on-site parking facility. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment(FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides additional parking for library patrons, meetings, and special programs. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: Phase II Design started in FY 2013-14 and construction of the expansion is scheduled to start in FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.153 Level: II MEDIANS AND ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS - CITYWIDE Infrastructure/Other Project Location , �S ..,,,,!..:....1 __ ._._.....,,. -- .-- ' -;///_ , :'-' 4' 1454.' 7, --.. ICDte Rfl 111 0 k ir .45.-A ,NORTE, . .7)- . ■.*.se'lL : 'I,. 7 ::: �G _ (Poy�. ° DEVl a� I gpLAtVA W S. .1/4 .."-• \ v t' g4O 'p�'+ - CHOc_�., ,:e.,,,79_____, -- , 71" tell'9Y , iiii444 itai ,......,, 91,...,4 _..„,.. \ . ... ,,,, .11 ..kihs:\,, .. 1 0 .\\<,.....4„ 1 —�`_,- . ,,,,v,,,G0... 1 G. ,, , . t, , ,rir, 4 • . .. . \\,..•„. ____ \\ _.41 czo. . .,..",----\ ,,,,,,,0_ ,,______ . ..,?..,..NC,94, ! 4 � . 4 k ..;. li' - , RED,- 1\1 Jr- ...t,-. -0-- ` �* i 'b, Feel '' Aerial Data-March 2010 0 2,500 5,000 10,000_ . < ''.* / Proposed Capital Improvement Program ,, ,'' Fiscal Years 2015-19 .7.r.–"= .,y-2(5-i. „ MEDIANS AND ORNAMENTAL PEDESTRIAN BARRIERS—CITYWIDE Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes the preliminary study, design and construction of a raised concrete median (with stamped concrete), and ornamental pedestrian barriers to provide neighborhood traffic calming and a safe crossing at locations with heavy pedestrian traffic including Deer Hollow Way, Serafina Road, Nighthawk Pass, Roripaugh Road and other locations within the City. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a safe crossing for pedestrians at various locations within the City. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community, A Sustainable City, and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: This project is currently in the traffic study phase and will be constructed in future years when funding is available. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.704 Level: II MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Projects Location .:,,14,43,,., .v•.4)e...A.„ ' ci ,. .. , 40 0 0 -II tkt" P/A? •P ' : .,. - ,'.a ‘7P' ,, ' SP - ''. ' '- ' ' - t. L (a - 1 - ?;'-' r `C■ " 4:0 lc, ‘4,c' # ''' ' o i o° I' 4c'L.A, .." -,,v ,Y ' , ',i- ge* 4>-.-I ,..• ,... " ,11,1." k .7 4,,, .. q- „,.., ,‘;''' ' . st-R-1?' l'',.: 4--) / . " ' . , . 0-, °,0‘ Clo, 4, '-k.' C, - ' 10 ,..,, T . 0. .• ., A- s-i, .0 - ,Ifl. .7. ss. :- ,... _.,. - '•,„L 'ill0,, . ,t ,. " .- . 1, 4..44` ‘". sl 0 t....5 s 4' .., ,01'-‘, .04A, , ' - , . •,,,' - I/ , + :, ... ,, L 4.6fill *4 '0 IiitiI''he'" ''' - ',- • - -- 4110„,.: .,,,, ,,' 3')-• , ., , , ,4 • '`. #•,' . : •.. : . :0 Cl :'S' '• P - - / r ( ',.4., .cl, ,74,.. • • -i • , . .- '' -4 - 0. 414 '' .r 't#/. •,, -II 411. e , .., ., le 44. . - ' ,• . 9; "., .;• .41„ 4. oi ilik r k .4.40, ..-.. .4.. 9. dill!'v*.,.. ,. - - 1110 ' 1 iliir - . 7.- '' ;.*: ': ' •'t,- -.—'';' - '''' 'It'• :: •/...,; • .".10 • . ,,.,,, •111 ‘•• .1 'ie. ,AO ill 10 •ro, 4/tv ,. 41+ • . -, .. IF ' ''' ' . ‘...il . ,-... - 6;s• - q, ..... . . '' \ _ '-- :.,\ ' i•. % : 0 rk "t‘NGLE OAK O , *, IM; Q - \ C N lit t. ,L imirme.._Animi_ iir ji6„ _ , cr ''... (7711.111111111* o RANCHO CALIFORNIA RO % FELIX4 . t/ C'0 o< 7 111011110. Xi•-t- P 0 10, "6 t A . •,:i. % c0" ,,,."' *. ' Sc('' ARK OR r , .. + ;, 4, 0 CZC' L '\‘"4... 4' ' IA . , ., . I . ' 4:',„ '‘;',I,,i‘..„'• , . \ k A% 41 ' :'• . •, •''\ ,,4. '..,,,,41014.4.-,•'• ,Aii"#. ' , C? C3 )". '•• ' • ,,z,s49.1. ,, ; 4...,)6... , Ar-‘ ';k.-- '^ • - , . _ . q , . , . • ., N. 5).- --..., \ 1 : • .. . , . . ..,,.., 4, r;< 0 ' VT6V5.' it • 1 . , . . . -. - . _.... 611# Aerial Data-March 2010 0 612.5 1,225 2,4;:eet ,.....,!..„,,, _ . . Proposed Capital Improvement Program 1 Fiscal Years 2015-19 MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure/Other Project Protect Description: This project includes the design of the proposed United States Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control improvements to the Murrieta Creek within the City limits. Benefit / Core Value: This project helps prevent flooding of Old Town Temecula. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Safe and Prepared Community and A Sustainable City. Prolect Status: The City is working with Riverside County to form a Joint Powers Authority to further the implementation of this project. Construction of Phase II, Winchester to just south of First Street bridge is scheduled to start when funding becomes available. Department: Public Work's—Account No. 210.165.735 Level: OLD TOWN SIDEWALK REHABILITATION Infrastructure/Other Project Location sli . .,.... *..* . ',, . . . -. , In. • 4009. ....,..._., 1 . .. ./: .. ..,, -.. .. .„, .,, . , . .. , .. „ ,. . ,..„ ,- ,. . . ,,,.... • 1. .., . ,,. ..'I J• • ''....«P• 4.4 • s -;\ .'''' ' , *H. t 4-,pr.,,,.: ._. '0 -•• -. . , , 1:,.-,,, ;; „„ .... .. . -„4. k. . , kit ,..,.. ,.. ,,.., .. ,..._..,, „..„.„,... ..-....*. . . , ,,,....,...: ....,. . . ..... A, . .,, .. ,.. . 44\ „it \ • i.-s, • '... .;, -AP'_e_i, ,,,c. ,,,,,. -......;,:. ,_, lkt. ,..• s..,.. - •.,• , , Ntsie. , IL - • A ' '''''.4.S., • P 41, ' C, ..t* ' '.1 ' *to, C fAlliiio. . ; A It' k:s N. I. ( \(t,,,s:4 NO. , . • /e,p,, N ‘ '''4, - . 1: ...i 41 -1.0, v. 4'-'4 •'‘.■ i'er d. i 4 0 i r'F 'IF `10)•” '4,Zi +,!".-, , • ...: , PN 4 ' ? •' ,• <NI - ." S. • , • 4 ' ' • 1. *,...,.. . 1 -c.,„ . „ < ,„?,,,• .', , . , . ,:: .4,- . • ... ; ,..„: .,. :.:, '.......oA \ 'at 4 I I t"'1 .''.., 'Z. P'.4•:''' '' u, ,, ' r 44 - ■ ,, .• ' , ,;,.. ,,,,-,,,. , . ••• , .i.t. N`,,,, ..ts... .... , < -,, . , ,e • • 4 ' ,I. - . , .•4 4 „w \ . ,, ,/ , , • '' ,, .e. N. P..44.:'\,P.,.. ' .,'4' 'PP. P <" .. ., ili3, . l',..\ - . ,P•.',;14 . , *4, . , "P .'"•.• i ,AiL ''''''l../'''''N)7/1‘ '' , , , , ! ;- ,P1';' . *P.., ' ''' . •17k,.. 1 4, IP' Or iP' - '.- ." - 111 ,, - -..„,,,. › - . ,. fl s ,,, . ,, S. ,4,-ss. ..v - • ' ,,,'" ' '-o.,,,,, c.a ' -, ,, ' "t` ;:.' ' 4. -- .` . , ..., 1 •!IL ix , ,-- 4 ,.---''• • ,. .\ .0',,,, i'4'• s , l' .':. 441.; ■ . ...- . - ' . ,‹ , .._ '''' " . ,-,-. ,t e '', 64. NA" P.' " ',„, '4•••'' ."%1 -4, ' ( ( A I L, .,. . ... ., ., .,., .. / , 44, .‘t ,. ' , . ., -'' :C. '' i. '•• -N.> ' •i ,'' ' .•061.14 '''. . 4/4.7 ., .. 1$11, p.7 • •^ ...'S o• , . , . .., . L-; 7, - • - --' 7-, >d- - '•„•., . . ..S . \_ . 4- • \- , - / - - : '-'1,p. • • ., . 'ti, -' ,N(c.- , , ...: . ,11,,,.-- . ...„, ,,,,, ,-, ,. ,,....,„ ptp. 4 Go . of ..:') - C'. I I, , 4..."'N• ' - -_ .• , SA N Ti ,''',' ..,, • I `1, - ,. • \ ■,, - . - . . ' 10 , / -'7." " 11, Ah, I / lir:4111111 0 120 450 Aerial Data-March 2010 Feet 240 .,_ -._ .-- Ii c,..__ 04,,,Firwro -0,(4..._,.„ __. _ Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 5 OLD TOWN SIDEWALK REHABILITATION Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project will establish programs that will provide financial assistance to property owners to construct sidewalks, remove boardwalk plank boards, reorient street lights, and plant street trees, as specified in the Old Town Specific Plan. Benefit / Core Value: This projects promotes a sustainable City by encouraging mixed-use infill development along major transportation corridors and by promoting a "walkable" community. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: This project is implemented in concurrence with private development as it occurs when funding becomes available. Department: Public Works Level: II OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Infrastructure Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program J Fiscal Years 2015-19 OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROGRAM Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project provides matching funds for the acquisition of selected parcels west of the City within the escarpment area. Benefit / Core Value: This project maintains the natural esthetic of the escarpment. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of A Sustainable City, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Protect Status: For protection of open space, the City will consider acquiring parcels on the market as they become available. Department: Planning—Account No. 210.165.509 Level: II PAU SA ROAD SIDEWALKS Infrastructure/Other Profect Location go Proposed Capital Improvement Program `` Fiscal Years 2015-19 ; NiMINIMIMMIEME;.913-Prifi -- PAUBA ROAD SIDEWALKS Infrastructure/Other Project Protect Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalk along Pauba Road from just East of La Primavera to Ynez Road. Benefit / Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and a Sustainable City. Project Status: This project is scheduled for construction in FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.714 Level: I , PECHANGA PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Infrastructure/Other Project Location T�.� 0, . da, io t T c ,� .1 •b ¢ } ' }4 ems • �� 1 Wr 44,,,- , -- .•ry-_ art .1. _ ;,q .�t �a . . , ''415* '''..::::7 i'l "4 i L :C*''''' _ 7 .....„ ....:.:( . 6-, • • .4,1,-,, 1 - _ - �.'wlL7 �r .. far - TEMF( JLA PK • 141t‘ - � GABRIELLEti� f �p�' ;.r y SAMANTHA LN °�Y y - - I, ~:"'.':'..'",:=., ♦ �+ } tillo vt,Izt‘o.Y: ' '4 '.. . cc .. an 0 . .4 F , :A7I ;DFi tl�' Oyu b p�'t ? . d Q,LN a r . .-- *• • � �6 . '°: G tl' G Jii fi t.":iriettl' IA'To 0* ' ,314r. fa -or- WAILEA CT .4--,1111.. U F ti t‘-4 '•a {� .� ,°T.1 t' t 1� ,+,I" r . .iN. • . J, rte- C`(� �O�4� , i kr`fir , '°l k �` f A. c� '0 N> ... i 0 rr Ct.c„,.. 06.. ,, . ,4 5„;.„,i. )-s ,t4t .:(,'' ,i, , w r I Feet A , 4 Aerial Data-March 2010 0 300 600 1,200 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 141112 "al" 5 PECHANGA PARKWAY ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes the design, construction, and implementation of an environmental mitigation site required for the Pechanga Parkway Project, including acquisition and planting of the mitigation site in Temecula Creek. In addition, this project provides water to plant material and monitoring the mitigation site for five years. Benefit / Core Value: This project increases environmental mitigation areas. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City. Project Status: The design and construction of new wetlands will be complete during FY 2014-15. Upon the approval of the resource agencies, the maintenance of the created area is estimated to be completed by end of FY 2018. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.516 SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRAIL EXTENSION AND INTERCONNECT Infrastructure/Other Projects Location CC4'.. ' 44' 4 \: , ..4'.\ ) \ e Aid N\LI' '. f t ,r. -;* ,. ilp. 'r",.,, '•,,, ;.(1.' 40c kt` �/� 1 C A 1/-L e , 1- �'` '�' spa 4 L td + �� a 9 �►. 11? fir, , )` , if �. 1 "r ,. F , ;, ti o, y < �` �d 4 � ", fi r `' L 4 4 ',.■ G. • itl! V '',‘ , . _ • Of r $49- :iz.:2,(.., ...Slip: '., „' • , ' 0-,X clik'..,,r 4‘4',6,p °s - NiNto,.._ A , .w- 4%0, g_ 0 • ter} y NI*'' /r �� l / N Feet , , ,..., Aerial Data-March 2010 0 400 800 1,600 Proposed Capital Improvement Program ; j Fiscal Years 2015-19 tJ SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PEDESTRIAN / BICYCLE TRAIL EXTENSION AND INTERCONNECT Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes planning and preliminary engineering for the extension and interconnect of the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail. The extension and interconnect will provide access and under-crossings at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue, and a continuous paved trail along the Santa Gertrudis Creek to interconnect with the Murrieta Creek Multi-Purpose Trail. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides additional pedestrian and bicycle trails for the community. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity. Project Status: The project is currently in the design phase and will be constructed in future years when funding is available. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.739 Level: Ill TEEN I YOUNG ADULT VILLAGE. Infrastructure.1 Other Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program orris Fiscal Years 2015-19 TEEN CENTER Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project consists of hiring a consultant to review the current teen center located at the Community Recreation Center in Ronald Reagan Sports Park. The consultant will provide a plan for tenant improvements, as well as amenities that will provide teen entertainment, social and education activities. All recommendations will included approximate costs. Benefit / Core Value: This project will result in the plan to upgrade the current teen center in order to better serve the teen population. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: The consultant will complete the study and provide recommendations in FY 2014-15. Department: Community Services—Account No.210.190.122 Level: TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE Infrastructure/Other Project Location - ., ict.,..'..,%, \---' ,c,,,zi, i ' , 4- -; , — ' ... ;:tec. 4 ir_ ,, lib, : .•`'"'N) sli140,44.64444444NNII0 w ,_..,,,_ igvt.,e. ip„4 - ' . . - ''''''' *'a '',, '.'r"'4':' N (15'. ' . j•L:414;;;•'''.- '' IF':?' 1 A•'4 47 .1. ' im4;114:::: ' - 4111 At, Iyr: , ^ ,# r , . , ,\ d ' 1 . 40- r. ' / 51,1'.. - .s- ' , _ • 1. x 444 ar k , , P ' , 41ititiki I I k .........4.,,,,,,, A, iii ti .. . .,,-- ...-.7-04-r , ,,,,.4 TNT- A ILI Ni..,,,....- .00041i 4,2 , . ` , . 'tse:(2,!‘i - a� 11 , f ,h , .- ,fir'' , .: .- , . : . 1,1,,,,,K.' , . ' ,, 4 lilt eig(1) .Fax \, iso i Aerial Data-March 2010 0 150 249 sao .........„ Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 25P'" - _ - -- TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project includes the acquisition of property, design, and construction of a Park and Ride facility in the vicinity of Temecula Parkway and La Paz Street. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, access control, and other identified Information Technology needs. Benefit / Core Value: This project enables and encourages Temecula residents to carpool when commuting. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Sustainable City. Project Status:, The design of this project is complete, but the bid package will need updating before moving forward. This project has been designated as a Transportation Control Measure (TCM) project pursuant to the Air Quality Management Plan/State Implementation Plan (AQMP/SIP) to meet air quality conformity. The 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and the current 2011 Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP) identifies the Temecula Park and Ride as a committed (programmed in the first two years of the FTIP) TCM project. Once a TCM is committed for implementation in the first two years of the FTIP, the committed TCM must be operational by the completion date in the prevailing FTIP or FTIP amendment. The Temecula Park and Ride must be completed by December 31, 2015 in order to fulfill these requirements. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.747 Level: THEATER REMEDIATION Infrastructure/Other Project Location % - �i] �_ „ y. � :- a :• ~ � 4 �tQ ; -tbc, ` ,`. f•� t�'r fir. 4,.' al ----- .0. Ks yL,, / , o t - „ .. 14"N.•. 40- e . () Ali , . ... / . 1 -' "ft '' .0,04(./,\;:\s.\ ev• 1-",. , IF ,,,,, \ 4 kte It. .4 r ,, _4 - l'a '• • ,Iff,,, ' 414), 41. e.,.\\'' - ,--: . • - , ,.,n '',le y 4 �.. ; ., i N%%.., 6 wig , 1, rr . }3• A' , . v. 4' 1,si.' 41410 ''':"/ 4 '. A !4 ♦ .„' ,.,71,1),,,1 ittiliiii: i Feet Aerial Data-March 2010 0 55 110 220 Proposed Capital Improvement Program F Fiscal Years 2015-19 / - ., THEATER REMEDIATION Infrastructure/Other Project Protect Description: This project addresses design and construction deficiencies at the Old Town Community Theater primarily related to problems with the exterior cedar siding, decks and exposed timber. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs. Benefit / Core Value: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life, and corrects design and construction defects at this facility. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy Livable City, and A Safe and Prepared Community. Protect Status: Construction is estimated to start in March of 2015. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.756 Level: I YMCA REPAIR AND REMEDIATION Infrastructure/Other Projects Location IV --..,,. 4, I `fr • "� !� , wi. - "J•, J-�l- .J ♦ 4 fir �r . f R rte. .�,, -r--.: 0,, :':' — 14111s.*:-\\VO.N.040: . . '— sio.. ---- ., w' ..k ` rr •. f. ;,-!. tip,. , r4r'' ' .,v / t ,• � , �I P .- / 1. } 111101110 AK , r � I . . -% .1i, lb ••-_za.,,-. . 41%•.--,404, . 0 x!-:..4e � d • ,+ •a Ou ` . r �• ti j :��• f y5 ' Q~ t Tl M ! .J' R r Feel '4,�,•. Aerial Data-March 2010 0 75 tso aoo Proposed Capital Improvement Program 5 Fiscal Years 2015-19 YMCA REPAIR AND REMEDIATION Infrastructure/Other Project Project Description: This project will include the design and construction of the repair and remediation of the YMCA building on Margarita Road, including the roof, exterior cladding (stucco walls, windows, and doors), shower and restrooms, swimming pool, site drainage, and other miscellaneous repairs. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs for this project, Special Needs Playground and Senior Citizen Outdoor Fitness Lot Projects. Benefit / Core Value: This project will remediate the building deficiencies and upgrade it to current building codes and standards. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy Livable City, and A Safe and Prepared Community. Project Status: Construction will start in FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works—210.165.759 Level: I Capital Improvement Program aeiT:Vea-4 Fiscal leafs 2015-19 A PARKS AND RECREATION Table of Contents Children's Museum Enhancement Project Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Parks Improvement Program Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park Synthetic Turf Enhancement Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal and Desiltation Pond Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Replacement Senior Citizen Outdoor Fitness Lot Special Needs Playground CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Parks and Recreation Project Location ., a . "A.Lo csst■ 4 ,,.,. ir.„. , e. ' 7-, iiiI\ 411 .. 4, ,� * '� ,pr, �+'' ,'` - ,Y ' y III: . "t?'' ..6, Nti6 ', , , Y..40, - . : .: ,. :, . ,_,Ibib'-.;: ''''....,..:41t;it.fa:,,. -„litfrj ,),,41.:i.." ''':\'' ' '1111 . r --:, ' , . • ' .." '4F , .. .?,, ;yip., %,.-.66., 'fik, ,,,,,,,.,,,4„,,,. -- .: eNt..., � `4 • . v iii ' K �/• ,4 -..j �. , ' • /" r -► , • . ',4:'0" e ' . '` .;- \i Feet . ,,,.. je/e'e,.*v . .. ''. .1+ v , ,�,�; Aerial Data-March 2010 0 50 100 200 Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 .w4"125""�. —_ —� CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ENHANCEMENT PROJECT Parks and Recreation Project Prolect Description: As exhibits and play experiences in the Children's Museum become outdated, this project allows for the re-design and replacement of exhibit areas or refurbishment of existing exhibits. This process provides the museum visitor new and updated play experiences. Benefit / Core Value: This project enhances existing exhibit areas of the Children's Museum. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: This project will be completed by June 2015. Department: Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.125 Level: II 'FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND'REPAIR Parks and Recreation Project Location • C"' _ _ "' ' / Proposed Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. These park sites include Pala Community Park, Margarita Community Park, Butterfield Stage Park, and Long Canyon Creek Park. Benefit / Core Value: This project prevents further erosion into specific park sites. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: A priority list of projects has been developed. Repairs and reinforcements are completed on an ongoing basis. A study of the affected Parks is underway and will be completed during FY 2014-15. Design and construction of the recommended fixes will be implemented based on available fund. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.127 Level: PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM' Parka and Recreation Project Location ' ' Proposed Capital Improvement Program 72r5r*"- '�'' � Fiscal Years 2015-19 PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation and improvement projects at City parks such as Ronald Reagan Sports Park, Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park, Pala Community Park, Paloma Del Sol Park, Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park, Loma Linda Park, and Butterfield Stage Park. The rehabilitation and improvement projects could include, but not limited to, parking lot repairs and resurfacing, raised and cracked concrete sidewalk replacement, fencing repair and replacement, landscaping and irrigation system efficiency upgrades, lighting system repairs and efficiency upgrades, on-site drainage improvements and other similar projects. Benefit / Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitations are completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.130 Level: I PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL SPORTS PARK SYNTHETIC TURF ENHANCEMENT Parks and Recreation Project . ,. .. . 4 1.. _ -.-..... ...„.... .„ .', -‘ . . - - . 1. '' .:.*... ' :, '',. .' 'I''' .,. - ■(,'..i.''''iA., , 7''',' 14' V '..Alle E.14 . iLik.,,t A. ' .,-..., .. . .7.,...s.,.... . .,,, ... -,.--1 ,!..-,.:..4 C '14 .....10 '- . ; ,N, -. se..rv" .,_ , ••1,--,--I , . ) . - At "! , 4, ' , l:_ • r. 1 \ ill,15_4' % - -40 .,:,-1°3; ,11 V •N• ' + ,-. "- '•. *vv4 i„,,` 0 1\ ''• -:' ...-A ' , .,.. ".., L.7, :.` 4,..-- 41_,. - .• '• • , „, 41. . .----A.. ..---- • .4 . ., . • ', 1'-- i , .A ,- ,;-- is it , i :.■■,; -, ' •:.:.,. . cites:F:0T 4010- • * • ,.,' —:4'77' -- , , !--1 + •4 :%t. • 4. - - •,.. • ,- 4 ' • , . „km, it-- ) ..„: • 1,,. _, `0••••-• ,',11*1 uswo. op,r1L72.7.7.- * i ... , fsie14, • 'tt *:.. , '..--- • -.Q., . • • . % ROCKY4AR-DR - i ••••- ' ,- 1 ' -.0 ' • . 4 - — • ,, ------ - , 1 ‘,. • 0 . ,1/4 ,.e ,,i, '..,. ' 'I, ,46, e" i s . . .,. .- -' - ''' -'PI '‘;,. ''''',' -:• —-, . / ,," ' " , . ...i.. . .....:, ...c . ., . „ . ... ;11 :*:.; . :".4/ireffrt .t1., "T' ...,,...:k. , , • \ .. .. It;„,.•..„ / • ., . ...1 0 0 • -°'''k: - " . . -;•+.. • :.,,t• . '- . ,k— - i , , .. ,kr:4-.3,tee.... - , ,,,? .. -•ick .. . ',..- —.-,....er, ' (••••,e/ 471 . . . 1 • ..• iiko.,,,-. ., - - ....„4.41 ...- ititiN,:., ,i - . A • • • . : 1 '„'i . .. 7 ' 4. c% '-. 4, ,-/ •40,-/-• • •- L :os- 1Pit 's • _ , . ... , \ , ,. i • (V. -••.___., •, '''...-' — -.-, -,', Patr%iciaH,Blicls'a..11. •'-'''' 74 ' . .::'.,.,., .. .141- ,,,,,, . . ...2. ..,'•.• - . - , — ' " • S arts Park - • r,., ,.., I ,- .1k, .• A. . ,. .. , : • (.. . •,,..",,,;./ ,,, ''''\, i 7 , -.14,4610, f --•:....-:).„, '.- --. _. .,- _.-.:*„.•• . .,..,, ,;-,,,.../ ., '- • • • - / '1, .- , . . • .".- '-' • •••,. 7* • •7 . ••., k.. \ i /.• , . • .1 . . ." ./ ie * -- : • • r , i t .. ., / • . /, ;Or Se' ‘4› 1, / I --'-'. • L.,,. ,,,•::••• .,../ . ' .-1.•7 11, • .,%* . 1,4.: • .• ., _._.., x • . - ,.,.. '',,., ,.•_.4, . -...„,..-- ' .,,. , ...de, .,... ....• „ . • i 4,,,... ... . . .. ..., „,...f % .., ... ,s . ,, . . •.. , .. -, ... ,.. . . ,• ,. . . .. . .. „ lv.. . 7.',/". , / • : ' . - ••• $4.•,.••• . ..../- • ;. A .. ... . /-.. . . "•.\\‘'\..> r , . sik..,.....,. _ ..... . ‘, ' - ,, '••••.• .. ...11; . \ ' ' .\ .1''''.,:: . ..',.:',,?,'.•/ ...:-._:."_. '‘.,,,,, . \ , \N. ,, • -', .,• ,, .., . '' - .--- 1,L\C':. :': -" _n• , 1, PI *ttP•Illi S -',' ROSE , c,.r....'••• -• --- : X- .1 16 -- ..• s' ,, -- 7.;" ' ‘ ^'. ,:74 1'1,1' - - - . ,• ., . \ ■ Ct" ,cs■ .0. ,.. ., .... , `:- •._ * • . , . * ., =11=■Feet Aerial Data-June 2011 0 50 100 200 A •-.. 109 „is him Proposed Capital Improvement Program . tr *-Flie:rekt"S Fiscal Years 2015-19 PATRICIA H. BIRDSALL SPORTS PARK SYNTHETIC TURF ENHANCEMENT Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project includes the removal and enhancement of the synthetic turf and inf ill material at each of the four synthetic turf sports fields at Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park. Benefit / Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Protect Status: The removal and replacement of the synthetic turf will be performed at one field each year for the next four years starting with the Multipurpose Field at the southerly end of the park by fiscal year 2015-16. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services 210.190.119 Level: II PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAFETY SURFACING Parks and:Recreation Project Location Proposed Capital Improvement Program 2 Fiscal Years 2015-19 V PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT ENHANCEMENT AND SAFETY SURFACING Parks and Recreation Project Protect Description: This project includes the removal, re-design, and enhancement and replacement of playground equipment and safety surfacing at existing City parks to comply with current state and federal regulations. The City park playground include sites such as Pala Community Park, John Magee Park, Butterfield Stage Park, Long Canyon Creek Park, Nicolas Road Park, Paseo Gallante Park, Rivertron Park, Redhawk Community Park, Rotary Park, Stephen Linen Park, Sunset Park, Temecula Creek Trail Park, Temeku Hills Park, Vail Ranch Park,Veterans Park,Winchester Creek Park, and Calle Aragon Park. Benefit / Core Value: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Project Status: The removal and replacement of playground equipment and safety surfacing will be performed at one to two sites per year. A priority list has been developed and replacement will be completed on an ongoing basis. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.120 Level: II RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK CHANNEL SILT REMOVAL AND DESILTING POND Parks and Recreation Project Location $ / //_ - ` ' 14iiii, , - 11, ,',. :. aikr ' - ` 4 T ojciffigi .- J . _ - % 1. 4te }Al • NAt ... '10/44 4'0'. . -,".-- ,- - , . ,f • f . * _ f , 1 _ fit i. tir , f • I -ice a...— _ .r * ''� "' ' ` A t$>? SO I Feet Aerial Data-March 2010 0 100 200 400 v� � Proposed Capital Improvement Program 4'46(;'125"14' Fiscal Years 2015-19 RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK CHANNEL SILT REMOVAL AND DESILTING POND Parks and Recreation Project Prolect Description: This project will include excavating, hauling away, and disposing of silt in the channel location in Ronald Reagan Sports Park, and the desiltation pond west of the sports park, as well as mitigation. Part of this project was completed in December 2007, in accordance with City Resolution No. 07-105, Declared Local Emergency. Benefit / Core Value: This project will increase the flow capacity of the channel in order to prevent flooding in the sports park, and increase the capacity of the pond to hold storm water and reduce down stream sedimentation. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of A Safe and Prepared Community. Project Status: The design for restoring the Best Management Practices (BMP) of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and the Required Water Quality Management Plan by desilting the basin near the sports park is nearly complete. Removal of silt and construction of the mitigation site was completed in FY 2012. Upon approval by the resource agencies, the maintenance of the mitigation site is estimated to be completed during FY 2016-17. Department: Public Works/Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.187 Level: SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK PLAYGROUND REPLACEMENT Parks and Recreation Project Location Wr a f y v . . .. . . , '.,, \ ' --'-'-/-\'''' '''' '''' .de ..':- '7,, '''-..,1• ..s.$1\ ••4 ''' -. '''*"•-:,.,'. , . I Olt vrR'' k, ti 'w t - •w_ - . a.hr % . . , . .,,„ a r' .I ( t y' w , 70r ` t w ' - ; tip, . . i I 4 '114"."' \ ),.::1, t . . 1 ' -• 411. 4. ' . - - ,..‹(4% , ‘ ..' ,.:. i k 7C • .-2 \.. ," #� ' l k'r 1 4 1. � x t." t•-•'.• 't '1,\• a1r � 'ti. � ' - 'h � r, „ , .... , ,, . ..„, . ., , .40 • ''''.1C' ' ..*':),-1,-*,\I ,N.::\:,'..:,, . ..,::, „01.7. I , -, ' ' ---,--- .-....st,,,,_,,, .:*.--,A'.AN, / ,,I.„1„, ., fs,,,,,,,,,,, „ . . ,„$.N. 5‘ a T ,,..,04,-,,..,..-. , ..,.. ,-..*',,..iii**z ..,,s.-.;:.:.„;,,_._,,,,, ,-s,,,,,...,, * , - , - ..„..04,'', ,-,, V . 1.., * ti it �' xM1 4 r . (r) Tti,' tillio.,.. .., r.• , ,r 1 y x_re '�;4' 1 le ,I. V:•-‘F.F , Q -k .w. E,e .• :\ ` • Pik' r t -- ' `�yr S�,. M"ir- r t V \ 4 rt 0, - . _, 1.,:t<,::),*,,itY4 u-'1:4.41.0, ,4,44e,,. , $ , .„. , . ,, z Feet Aerial Data-March 2010 a 1ao 200 400 C-----'1 �:, 2 Proposed Capital Improvement Program .- Fiscal Years 2015-19 . :1 SAM HICKS MONUMENT PARK PLAYGROUND ENHANCEMENT Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new innovative play area to replace the existing equipment, including removal of old equipment and installation of new equipment, and resurfacing according to ADA Guidelines. The Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment (FF&E) covers camera system infrastructure, access control, Public Wi-Fi and other identified Information Technology needs. Benefit J Core Value: This project provides an enhanced play environment and improved access for the disabled. In addition,this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Prolect Status: This project is estimated to be completed by the end of FY 2014-15. Department: Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.132 Level: I .. — . SENIOR CITIZEN OUTDOOR FITNESS LOT Parks and Recreation Project Location —, va .,- -4 ..,.. •- ',FIPIIIr ' •- maw-. 7wr- r • . •-,,,:. #' ,. . ,:, –_ _ .- ■ ..• , . ,,,, ...,,,:: - a 1-• - i $ ...e 7',...t••■'. dig /1 Vr ...1 • . , ';I.' / g '' . La . ' • _, ... 4.0 . ..... , ir . .' .0, OPI, .. i , - . „, ,- .-', . . : ..,. . , • . , , I ...... . _ .-- As.• Eistui... ?4, A...i ,- :': - - 4 . -... I : *--- ' . 4.•' ' , . " 0 • .' '..' - 11' 4 .'...)'',4,1110,,, ' . _..'.._"_. ,1 4 .1111m164,1,44 ..e ., . . . ''-'1 J, II) ..... ' .0'./ :..-. * , '• ,I ; ,, „ , . I 4 ,•,4!." 41 / 111P • ii.,_ _. ,, RGAR - -44.141.1"m'aemm....., 'IL . • (Mk.— • ',',/ •-,. . • _. a - N..'" .:7 7. . . ' ..,7'7:'•-•-•,, ".'..`keiefr--, 144611...t.q. .gar.40.-_... .:1( _ '*7. 410! . I. .., - ,.. , . 4Ir '• : .: 1 _ .'. . :• - ......iii•".2.: ..-' '*. ZoT r - ,,._, - '11.'27?-6 • g- if.-T: o. •,, .... „ .. . . \,. . ' '-', 46 • • •::' / • • . if T • . - r 1 ,.:._ . , -... . . / 44Fitk 1 I . 11 .11:7 'it• C t ' ,' 1. . • 4,-'. . ' ' . •.r . li- ' it "IIS AV , , . •4,6 ..: :','" '..- • 1• .. ' . • ,-"Ptv ..› . .4't" , — -",,, ,,. e. • ,, -r ....;. , , ' • 4. '. • - jr , . ..d1 ibkO • ..61. a* ' I • . • . -. , ,. II I 4. - . .. .- - - i, _B•. . 1 . _..,,-..,__,„_ - a •• 6 ..- . -‘ . . . 4?-",- 411 .1.;,•41.46.6-6.6.0. .7„,,,, _.. ......... ,,,: • ,. . haill1417:'66,44.4.4.•._- , .---- ."`"*.eti'N,Li..-41". 'kJ- °'.."94'. .73: • - - _ . - -• 04'''. . *,"ti'i• )' ' ef• „.„--i 4/4 • , _ •,,,,,, . 4,ii.:.. -4,4,A 3,, - ' T ' . . . .. __ _ . .,. ..--.. . ... . ..,. . Feel -, i• fil 0 60 160 320 Aerial Data -March 2010 • Proposed Capital Improvement Program -. •.,-.� Fiscal Years 2015-19 SENIOR CITIZEN OUTDOOR FITNESS LOT Parks and Recreation Project Prolect Description: This project includes the design and development of an outdoor exercise area for mature adults to be located in Margarita Community Park. Construction of the exercise area will be located in the park and consist of ADA accessible surfacing,four to ten exercise apparatus for mature adults, shade covering, water fountain, and fencing. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a venue for seniors and mature adults to exercise. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: This project is estimated to be completed by end of FY 2014-15. Department: Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.133 Level: II SPECIAL NEEDS PLAYGROUND Parks and Recreation Location a►Artf Proposed Capital Improvement Program Felrn�s Fiscal Years 2015-19 1. 10■61.10-rillerk C.1 SPECIAL NEEDS PLAYGROUND Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: Phase one of this project includes the development of a special needs play park area at Margarita Community Park. The area will be fenced and include a play apparatus appropriate for youth with special needs, as well as picnic tables and benches. Phase two will incorporate a water feature within the special needs play park area. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides a play area for youth with special needs. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: Construction of the two phases of the project will be completed during fiscal year 2014- 15. Department: Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.129 Level: I 71 Capital Improvement Program (CI r11—..''elttio---#4 Fiscal Years 2015-19 SARDA / HOUSING Table of Contents Affordable Housing AFFORDABLE HOUSING Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency(SARDA)/Housing Project Location r ,2,. , , EIE HEMACI.', "1`/x..1 ✓F " \ y, • ""' . ., - 1 1 _ "lam "l , .y 'G ' ,, � 5 - ! - .k , 4 Ili:. ,*, •11114 I ;Ai-, ' ' filk..0 * ,i.t ,, . -,. -, \ - 1 ■ tile ,44-1,:: r III` !�' . _ • v:• 1 n •x •y� v ' "Si eta; 1?�,. ' , �• Y l'$.,' c1.° !, �jip.• ' 1,. 7 f ' 'es. ,1 r•. r, m - , '.\ .e .. Al ';'„„' '+. '"r �y, , .. Av. . ' . . ,,,i'. 7 ';,:„,wL::44,4)9f.,.!,:‘ .. l'i'%."'",,,' ' '' 0 ,. ,y , . , , ,, 74... .-`','.4.0 ...7,!_,tr',.,,,ir .7:417. .. ' . 41 ,,,::. } • r / \ .,4,.\:. lipp ,,e , ,4., 1 , N�1'r + a y'fit tiYy r 1 Y,1 `m . 1 i Feet '" Aerial Data -March 2010 0 250 500 1,000 .. ..... Proposed Capital Improvement Program //�s.��� y 1 Fiscal Years 2015-19 IIMMM■bNiFrrfqiCi .1 AFFORDABLE HOUSING Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (SARDA) /Housing Project Project Description: This project involves working with development partners to develop affordable housing projects in Old Town and the Pujol neighborhood which meet the State Planning and Redevelopment mandates. Benefit / Core Value: This project provides housing for all income types, encourages mixed-use inf ill development along major transportation corridors, and works towards the appropriate jobs and housing balance. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City and Economic Prosperity. Prolect Status: SARDA continues to pursue quality affordable housing development partners for the construction and management of affordable housing developments within the City. One funding agreement is anticipated to be entered into for the development of affordable housing during FY 2014-15. Department: SARDA—Account No. 166.800.815 Level: r � ITEM 4 L J STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: May 21, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Matt Peters, AICP, Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application No. PA12-0131, a General Plan Land Use Map SUMMARY: change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential and (OS) Open Space. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020). Planning Application No. PA12-0132, a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Open Space (OS) and Low (L) density residential designations with provisions for a cluster development. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Planning Application No. PA12-0133, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Also, other portions of the site associated with the residential component result in another four acres, or approximately 59% of the site preserved as permanent open space. Issues associated with the blue line stream and environmental agency permits have been avoided by designing a compact development footprint, staying away from the existing drainage onsite, and designating the drainage and sensitive portions of the site as Open Space (OS). Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. Planning Application No. PA12-0134, a Residential Home Product Review application for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA12- 0133) for four floor plans ranging in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types of each: Craftsman, Spanish, and Traditional. The residential portion of this project is proposed to be gated. However, the residential area is designed to be surrounded by amenities that are open to the public, but privately maintained, including trails, a park with splash pad, and associated parking lot off of Nicolas Road. 1 RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution recommending approval of the project to the City Council subject to Conditions of Approval. CEQA: Mitigated Negative Declaration with Mitigation Monitoring Plan PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Lenny Dunn, Regent Properties General Plan Existing: VL —Very Low Density Residential Designation: Proposed: L — Low Density Residential and OS — Open Space Zoning Designation: Existing: VL —Very Low Density Residential Proposed: Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on L — Low Density Residential and OS — Open Space Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant Hillside and Valley North: Vacant Land across Nicolas Road with Approved Tract Map No 32246 at Low Medium (LM) Density South: Large Lot Rural Development in Meadowview East: Single-Family Residential at Very Low (VL) Density immediately adjacent with Single-Family Residential at Low Medium (LM) Density just beyond West: Single-Family Residential at Low Medium (LM) Density BACKGROUND SUMMARY On July 12, 2012, the applicant submitted four applications for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to a PDO, Tentative Tract Map, and Home Product Review. Comments were provided in August of 2012. A second application was submitted in September 2013 to address density concerns, easement locations, and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) stormwater detention issues. Comments were provided, and a third submittal occurred February, 2014. Comments on the third and final submittal involved the location and public access of the splash pad along Nicolas Road. A parking lot was provided for the splash pad off of Nicolas Road. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Nicolas Valley Public Informational Meetings and Community Survey The project site is located in the northwest corner of the City of Temecula, often referred to as "Nicolas Valley." This area is in transition from a rural setting characterized by large lots, modest homes, horses, and dirt roads to a more suburban setting as evidenced by two new churches, a Southern California Edison substation with nine new 100-foot high tension power line cables, and recently approved Walcott Estates, consisting of 45 homes clustered on 22 2 acres. Furthermore, Roripaugh Ranch surrounds Nicolas Valley to the north and east and will contain approximately 2,000 units, a sports park, middle and elementary schools and a neighborhood commercial site. This area is under construction and includes improvements to Nicolas Road, which will further change the character of the Nicolas Valley. During 2008 and into the spring of 2009, staff held several public informational meetings and worked with the residents of Nicolas Valley on the potential formation of a Community Facilities District (CFD) for road construction in the area of Nicolas Valley off Liefer Road, and potential General Plan and Zoning Changes in the larger Nicolas Valley area. A survey was developed and sent out with questions regarding potential lot sizes and densities in four distinct planning areas. Potential lot size options for each planning area included 2.5, 1.0, 0.75., 0.50 acres and other. Overall, the response rate to the survey was just over 60% (146 surveys mailed and 90 responses) and the attached exhibit to the staff report, "Nicolas Valley Proposed Densities," reflects the preferred density based on the survey results, input of local residents, numerous public informational meetings, and staff recommendations. This planning effort culminated in the recommendation for one acre density, and 0.5 acre net density in Area 2. Due to the economic downturn there was a mutual decision between the City and Nicolas Valley residents to "shelve" any action on the CFD formation and the General Plan/Zoning changes. However, it is important to note that this project, referred to as Arbor Vista, is consistent with the results of this planning process. Arbor Vista is located in Planning Area 2, which is recommended to develop at a 0.5 acre density with clustering given this area's location between a major thoroughfare (Nicolas Road) and rural development to the south (Meadowview) in order to provide a transition from low density to higher density residential development. General Plan Amendment and Growth Management Plan The purpose of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) is to promote orderly growth and development based on the City's ability to provide adequate public facilities to ensure high quality of life is sustained. Under the Policy to "Redirect Urban Development to Urban Areas," a goal is to "direct the Planning Commission to consider approving residential projects at the lowest allowable density in each density category. The Commission may consider approving a project above the lowest density if the project provides onsite or community amenities." The General Plan Amendment involves a Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential and Open Space (OS). The project site is located in the Nicolas Valley Rural Preservation Area, which calls for large lot, low density residential development. However, this property is adjacent to LM - Low Medium Residential Zoning to the north, south, and east, and has frontage along a major arterial, Nicolas Road. Also, while property immediately to the south is zoned VL - Very Low Density Residential, this project preserves open space immediately adjacent to provide a transition from rural to suburban development. The design of this project is intended to provide a transition between LM and VL development via a cluster/conservation development based on the Low (L) Density residential designation, which will result in the preservation of approximately 39 acres of open space on the 73 acre site. The site design will balance development and the preservation of open space in order to meet the goals of rural preservation in this area. In addition, the General Plan states that, "the Low Density Residential designation provides for single family detached residential development on larger lots; however, clustering of development may be appropriate to minimize grading requirements and impacts to environmentally sensitive areas." Furthermore, the design of the project provides benefits as part of the cluster/conservation development including additional trails and open space, and preservation and enhancement of natural habitat. 3 As proposed, the Planning Commission may find the project consistent with the Growth Management Plan because it is consistent with the Nicolas Valley Lot Size Option Survey, and includes over 50% open space. The project also includes several amenities, including high quality, four-sided architecture, split rail fencing and stone pilaster consistent with the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines, north-south and east-west trail connectivity throughout the site, and a splash pad/public park along Nicolas Road. All amenities are privately maintained and open to the public. Zone Change to PDO The Zone Change to a PDO involves a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation and Open Space (OS) with provisions for a cluster development. The PDO outlines the requirements for the cluster development based on the plotting and architecture proposed as part of the Home Product Review application. Tentative Tract Map 36479 The map will create 83 single-family lots on 73 gross acres, resulting in a density of 1.13 dwelling units per acre, which is consistent with the proposed Zone Change and General Plan Amendment from VL - Very Low Density Residential to L- Low Density Zoning that allows 0.5 to 2.9 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision has been designed as a cluster/conservation community in an effort preserve habitat and a blue line stream, and to provide additional trails and open space. Approximately 39 acres will be preserved as permanent open space, a majority of which will be located on the south side of the project providing a buffer between existing and proposed residential development while preserving habitat. In order to provide the open space, the homes will be clustered on 5,500 square foot lots (55' wide x 100' deep), which translates to a 0.12 acre minimum lot size. These lots will accommodate the proposed 2,300 to 3,500 square foot homes while providing 5' side yard, 20' minimum rear yard, 15' front yard setbacks to porches, and 20' setbacks to the garage doors. Access to the site will be provided off Via Lobo via two gated entries. The layout is tiered on an existing hill to minimize grading and take advantage of views and the topography of the site. The project will be conditioned for street improvements to Nicolas Road and Via Lobo. All of the open space, trails, and fencing along Via Lobo will be maintained by a Home Owners Association (HOA). The trail network will provide east-west connectivity between Via Lobo and property to the east, and north-south connectivity via an Metropolitan Water District easement in Nicolas Valley to Roripaugh Ranch and beyond. Access to the trails is open to the public and not restricted to residents only, thereby providing a community benefit. Home Product Review Application The proposed project involves the construction of 83 single-family homes on lots created by Tentative Tract 36479. The proposed architecture and plotting was reviewed for conformance with a proposed PDO, as well as for compatibility with the existing homes in the adjacent neighborhoods. 4 Architecture The project proposes four floor plans and three architectural styles. The architectural styles include Spanish, Craftsman, and Traditional which are intended to blend with existing architectural styles in the area, while taking advantage of the rural theme for Nicolas Valley Various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style: • Spanish: stucco finish, concrete 's' tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, decorative accent vents, clay pipe accents, decorative foam trim elements, wood fascias, arched multi-pane windows, arched entrances, front porches, decorative wood shutters, and architecturally enhanced garage doors. • Craftsman: smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, wood fascias, enhanced outlookers and wood braces, board and batten siding, foam trim, tapered porch columns with stone base, wood railings and shutters, and decorative carriage style garage doors. • Traditional: smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 6:12 roof pitch, wood fascias, lap siding, brick fascia, foam trim, porch columns with brick base, decorative wood shutters, and enhanced garage doors. The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Articulation is provided on all sides of the homes so that each side of each product provides specific features of the proposed architectural style. Each of the three proposed styles is defined from the others through the use of door and window types, window and door trim, garage door design, materials such as stone, roof type and pitch, shutters and the overall silhouette. As proposed, elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed to incorporate architectural enhancements. Building Elements/Mass, Height and Scale The proposed project includes four, two-story floor plans with three elevations. The units provide adequate articulation in roof forms and offsets to reduce massing and the elevations are visually broken up with offset facades, changes in materials, architectural details and/or sloping roof lines. The proposed units include well pronounced front entries with the use of arched entries, extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors are distinct and compatible with the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style. Additionally, reversed floor plans are encouraged to help achieve a distinctive street scene in the community. The applicant has incorporated the above mentioned elements and carefully plotted each plan (setbacks and mixing of each plan) with a distinctive combination of regular and reversed floor plans to provide variety along the streetscape and variation throughout the development. Each elevation provides careful articulation and architectural enhancements. Visual interest is achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and 5 depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials accentuate the various architectural styles. Materials and Colors The project includes a variety of building materials and colors for each of the three elevation styles. The color variation, stucco, siding, stone, and brick materials serve to break up the massing of the two-story units. The variation of material and colors also helps individualize each home and create character in the neighborhood. Product Placement Plan The proposed product placement provides a varied and visually interesting street scene which has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The units have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the PDO. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed and conditioned to incorporate architectural enhancements which include pop outs, shutters, decks, and additional roof elements. The lots that require additional enhancements are identified on the plotting plan. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on May 8, 2014 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an initial study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. A summary of the Mitigation Plan is provided below. AIR QUALITY General Impact: Short-term cumulative impacts to air quality due to construction. Summary of Mitigation: Water exposed surfaces daily, suspend if winds exceed 25 m.p.h., cover stockpiles of debris, and apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES General Impact: The project site has the potential to contain burrowing owls. Summary of Mitigation: A focused survey prior to grading will be required. CULTURAL RESOURCES General Impact: Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological or archaeological resources. 6 Summary of Mitigation: If any cultural resources are exposed during initial grading and ground disturbance activities, the City will be contacted, and a qualified archaeologist will evaluate the resources in consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS General Impact: The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). Summary of Mitigation: A Notice of Airport Vicinity shall be provided to all potential purchasers and/or tenants of the proposed residences, and any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. NOISE General Impact: Potential construction, operational, and traffic noise impacts. Summary of Mitigation Limit construction activities to between 7 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., implement noise attenuation on construction equipment, and provide a telephone number for the disturbance coordinator to be conspicuously posted at the construction site. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC General Impact: Contribution of additional traffic at nearby intersections. Summary of Mitigation: Provide right-turn overlap phasing for northbound Winchester Road and westbound Nicolas Road, and the project will be required to provide its fair share contribution for the implementation of improvements required to mitigate intersection Level of Service (LOS) to acceptable levels FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map 36479 (Code Section 16.09.1400) The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The 83- lot subdivision of a 73 gross acre site will result in a density of 1.13 units per acre, which is within the allowable density range of 0.5 to 2.9 units per acre consistent with a PDO based on L- Low Density Standards. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The Initial Study and special reports prepared for the project indicate that there will not be any significant impacts to the environment. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the Initial Study and associated mitigation outlined in the special reports prepared for the project have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements have been considered in the design of the subdivision, and will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required easements and dedication are required as Conditions of Approval. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby) because payment of Quimby fees will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. 8 Home Product Review/Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36479, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project has been designed to ensure compliance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Zone Change to PDO The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code. This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and General Plan Amendment from VL-Very Low Density to L-Low Density Residential. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan. The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. General Plan Amendment The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project design is 9 consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area. The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because it has been designed as a conservation/cluster development to provide a transition between high and low density development within the rural Nicolas Valley. The proposed development will preserve approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site, and provide additional trails and preserve habitat. In addition, the General Plan Amendment is accompanied by a Home Product Review Application that has been reviewed and conditioned to provide homes of a high quality design via appropriate massing, roofline variation, high quality and varied materials, and floor plan square footage consistent with existing development in the surrounding area. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity and Aerial Maps Plan Reductions PC Resolution (General Plan Amendment) Exhibit A— CC Ordinance Exhibit B — Proposed General Plan Designation Map PC Resolution (Zone Change to PDO) Exhibit A— CC Ordinance Exhibit B — Planned Development Overlay PC Resolution (Tentative Tract Map 36479) Exhibit A— CC Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution (Home Product Review) Exhibit A— CC Resolution Exhibit B — Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution (Mitigated Negative Declaration) Exhibit A— CC Resolution Initial Study Mitigation Monitoring Plan Public Correspondence Nicolas Valley Proposed Densities Notice of Public Hearing 10 VICINITY AND AERIAL MAPS .. r,•_ 4-4..„mirAll. - 1,..11TPA.,. En/ ! El El . 4 I mow*wit- ...tr___7 ._, . 7 01 is _ i. ,..._.. , tr.. , , i, ,...ogi_k ,,,11 It__ ____,-)°'18---:—.- ' 4%1104' rc 7 . .7' - ' i It.A.'4144111 g ..1 , -- ru-Tri--.1 ..-9 iwNrilLmr !0 I* --r. • ' AWY \-1' Ill . tior‘lco r*-:A a* I fil j ir -Atli t 0 4-stiesA - . . ,, .. . 1 t 54 Pik$071 \C'° tli 11 0,--V.1 it9 1:11 it 11 P ‘I71 ---7 I ' a s.____________-- . _a '`, Project Site A II _if, 014 0' i , .,..- -1 2 A t -------- --' 2 . . volowill liti --1 I 16:gal ri-7-- -- III ' ' Re. Ts 1 a _--------------- 41 - - a liir ii ore w 1114 )1i ____ __________ vox a 1 4t,, sik imi ./ tiAtibt in stc, , avoin........• fa 1.0„. , 1.0\IR— r 4 Arb. 1�a r 111110," 5 il.f 4't • . po. Wir,,,, . ' . - f,,,,, . 144-i . ft.', „el ............41, , _ , //lit i 4 iniii, _ id „„khVAi‘lrgik - 1r--1'''. — , km" e is' , A.,,.,.. .4-50., ., ,,:64411 . -,40,ito..„440,t,\ fra=1111110 bi/.-.%111 .111, ,iiir __Aw, . 1 11. *;:t7.4., 77;- :Ankillif110111111(1--.117.1\'')1}1111A111\W‘11 A . I Vittik Iklir 11 bAlilliAll 11111111 . 7:' --'-'/I141* ill '14 -'st...RF.- Ikaiii 16,.•_ 3;.4.4ii. tor c' 53 0 _. 1' ..m#►" i _ iril � -11 ` Feei' Ci• t y Temecula of N1,3' 1;w:cern i. , - wommbiTimi :.-„..ip 1 1 1414":1 6 is• 4:`la II. R I : ,- , iwaitil 11.1 ,. gig- aLir1 ' Lsolor,Lill • .1111 0 111 ft0 lis • 1111 , a...Ad.,,,,,,,„,, ,c,r , °- 1111111 tali Aih# 4002.1. eniformi....ii ., 1\ Ail" AL , ishillirall--41"ii&-"III11:61111.13111\IL-61111 :--;r. ' ' N miiii.7•40,5,‘ 1 Fp, , . I To 1 I ill . r .,,,:; _ . ift ,:. „04,,„., , 4pip ,4/94, . ii ,_ 'V • li . . . ,44, x► . , r, �� J lit Opt 1111 rp! .4. 0,,,,, - Lis A' oR igis 7 illi i lopititi, IMO IIIII fA L7'l�° irjp, Noe -No A U �, ��rtidi� N � i� �wrNrll ■ 0 500 1.000 2,000 Feet "s".r•: This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. i_5, The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessors -Y;; t Y'�" \, Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside { County.The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the s4• ,'.•-"` information contained on this map.Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification,The Geographic Information System and other sources should be queried for the most current information, This map is not for reprint or resale. PLAN REDUCTIONS °' 7 ARBOR VISTA LOT AREAS EXISTING EASEMENTS .. / J , TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36479 J r =; ° r ,,, ,E ,; CITY OF TEMECULA, CA ma ' °°,m ° ��' R,a�,., p ri"y 1'.C11FFJ 1. , ...,...„ , ci- werermErrilli EC/ ...........,....,...,..A..„,......, t„, rl.m..— wr' .. - W°NIIMER,INTIMRr-A-ms VICINITY NAP — �r - � nuJ O£9y� aa,�...,.., NOTES v...„,..,.... \ ® _ 1 �CJ��FpR�'1�FLa' S ,, rim 'I-9 i r .,-..,rla.`. f EM®mFC.xa .,.a" w 4 - '•,j,. 'I 1"N ISI�C�liF11F�LEfilnnIFIQ_ G .T1.' - , �Y - 4 k_.R•�iu t?. � 1 e Imo' ionaml� G,,,,.......,,,,--„,,.......,,,,,...: v...,..rrH.,...r,.r ,,.� o.>z,.. _ � 10TFFF1 V '� I1��.,�I�®FA . rxn �a ns rs Km,..vi .. ruCr yrrr. /� :1. 4 Fr.�ll!Wl2f�iFFF1 �,.. t �� RESIDENTIAL GROSS, ,, ..,,D Ur..SEMEN [". .,,..�,.,„..•,.s..,.,i<.' ` H d.l NET&AVERAGE AREAS PROPOSED EASEMENTS J ,. � 14 1 �! \\ LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS Mini(It \ • ...,7„,arue,n r4 IX L. E-\� 1 _ wF ha N f 7 T SUMMARYsc[ On ■--1 11 a I y1 .._ x .,.,e.s ,.�� is l: �4ss' Y” r • A ,�''.: LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIVY R1 ,>, STATEMENT OF OWNERSHIP \ ,.... - -----.------,_ ir IIII 11) \ TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS y. II, f can —.— . � ! i \ ,.[O1,° FS ROAD em Y[CI I4.10 WNW,aywM. ..... • 14JJ 1 r I r T PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: ;it, w.... A•D•e.T EM a c STr1ET EAST OF a SOTEET APPLICANT: I�t. �rt°-0 . aeoeNr PROPERTIES .. �.. �, LEGEND ..............r...W. , ;II._4.w1=..„ — �", .x"5.,,7.. -;1-----t--=...." t f ��� rat . ' `.--." • `.. �_ Dm v °:M' 1JJL.' `.� �. _ - ..-- ` .... - - - .�. TENTATIVE TRACT C.,,M __ .ORON.F e,�Y uAF°°Oea NM ..s �.s..._ we.=N:w MAP NO. 36479 SELDOM E. APRIL a%2011 . II ARBOR VISTA LOT AREAS EXISTING EASEMENTS CD`4,:',`:,:ly.,y1:A:11.^',‘,`,-•,-:',,,'..„`g,".„g', 1. j ,AN MV...EILW,L' TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36479 n , ..,■.' ,../ / / CITY OF TEMECULA, CA .s...Ems mu=DE.,o-• cm c,t1 C)'A,E17:7-,i,h.').`.F:','Itr.-.2.74'-'. _,-.-AD MT- 1. ......Mal3 111-110711ff Win MTJER-MT, ®4-4TA+A.,i'fAvc'l pAi=4+++.:AV.iZ+71': - . EXHIBIT "A" 1nm irrmwrimirmirrm reii Z.%f,'' , ,,. .2=-.' :r4.I. . -.- • •- • ..-+.`. "°,...... .,......' / -nrIter• i .r.iirn•M' icamr-Ao UM ■AMI......1111,1L51. ....--,AA' Alt' N., =MMIRE .1 M rlm- rritscinrau ...r.u..•11■DO•,11/1Fr O.., .P., I '',..,'.''''' ' V=r.fgri.Ver --- ........,-= ......m.... __.-- -" PP'... .--:„.111001.4 _001.• ' il, ...-- rim al-numni rciltrin -. _..--- 1111r0".40.-,.„ "'" 1.° ,,, :La ...' A ..--,. r.,f.4.:■ . immm ETINFL-Nald• -a . ....o.,..-..,,.,,,,-.,.... .-. :,-,.-..,r, NOTES ---- =_-..... , .....CE lek,11,:=1"" --.....t„•.3..... a n-mm-mlimM ----- .'.'' 112.4.1,,-30. ';•1"r.01 0.10.1 •11111111-2.X.t1 M.'r 0 7 t'g..".L.',',':.,v,`ff,,s V,'..`.‘,,,-,-..";.-7," ' ‘,,,,,„„„0..„„. -,,,,,,.-„ , ,-.,. = am NUMmE=M --------_____________:-------* _ IF, .-Te ...1)...„-nr. _ ....a ,,..'...'1';',.-...ra—Z.7:'-':',F.',-V".:=1-; 7 CO......o++Er•OPF++,4 okrac....,.1.+Conc+Fr•Ofc. .0a Orlke-el:•Vila-M7PEILE °7',""."...:X'',`„r"I'..7.7.7„---'...7.-":' •'.,-,-.1.,...,-,......,,•..-•,,....,-", _______ .tor.4115 .. =ECM n _ • f",„` ',.;'--"' ' .'" / \ ill t • -. .•.,. '., II- ' ' ( umr.G.I.m.a, ..-_, ,s,l,„,-,,,,.3 Ati..'.'.,...'...:'.1+..1•.+,'.-7--.-;_•-"A-\'*._ .,', ''e..+•l 1.\1''0,n iScv ri.''l'::'A.'.....I.f*.M M'■rE i O.Pt tili.N l m.A".-7. -i1Irh12f wff 4i ftM t-i?-m1Fr.p iv t kr-.w,o.\..'.N......„'',24',4,.,.4_-_4 0"L N,,,;•,-... iHmnN:et:n.+•w 27 D3-Poa,=m FI.MNe AM"ECe::tt.Tz.VI... A.e G ZMMG.R:E 5_.a.O SM■■i 7:1RE■ A S —.P....,.21..-:',.:• r:,-. ="" .4..-..■M .O,..,■.,.h,•.•.-,.■„.. .,.r,.„.fW,•.I.V.F W„..C,h.•„Pk1Er..,..,.„W•4/_[1.1.,.171R.0-,I0.O,.1. .W.1 • •I••X•IH,ar.r.t....".• ..Ehc.. .E. ,,,iiiila - „fit•t---1....,' -”. . .,... z,. LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS '-, 0'•41'lf. --,, ,...........P 0`V,, MIL O.' 101131V • .9 t.• C 4r%.14-,fp,-i--4-...1., -•,--- -.r.s...410”-- ii . * 'I' LOT SUMMARY CU— na-7;iTiXa, A.. \"\ ..■-•.'"3:7. 'II; 1 1 ,... 3..,,,,,,.iii.--...- _-.._r.'.••. •••a t i.".•'. ,. : _... . , • • ••'_ ..-'.-..".. ........_■=.+•:.,_'- '1 ..-r--. -' . '....-''''',...7. 4_ A t .......,,, ....,.......-,...,,,,„..,..,...,.............,. sti1/4, _. ‘„.. .,.. .......c.., ■ =.-==,,,•:.-- — ,.,. ic . WO ESVE OP OP CTIONS A- --x- - TYPICAL STREET SE ON ,.... , LEGAL DESCRIPTION ...... . et.,,r•-•"-r, .•-•,--.. 4. STATEMENT OF N, •",; ...0 -,...,,",...,,,,, ,,,,..., ' .......-' ' rusrus a ' __., nr,,,,,,., • ,-.,,,, ,,,., .e..,,, I_ : 41.0.1,..min.ALP a2 moo vahr swam 4.,..V.,71.,;' ' '1.4.- -3" ■ .---.4' SECO.0-0 . y.-_./ E, •+++,... AA•++,. +,,.. •n. --. - , „ ...N. - ''' 4:-.-. 4,. . ..----0 ....• . „,...., , \ • .,- ,,,...:;..."... ."..1-,a.'":1-11---'• , , ,...._„„,. ..- . .• =,....:- -- ..........4,,aa... f ,.. . , P.ES O a E STREETS•C ono.EAST OF E STRUT , ....... ECCTION 0. • ....+E A.s IT./2/T-27-191 od0, IA 77 + —. • \ Mar.th-EE:=••• 1 . ., 1.-. • e.:' '-' ' '-• r1 \ 1 0 SO• 100. SP .F.'..11.' % ' 7..1 -1.77' i• .„4, ',■ " e.• .„ - _ ___12, . ,..,..-.. ,,j, —T------qc.:.-- -• ....,. ....,, • • , _ • T, .._ .. , ,..,, .,.„: . _ ___ _ ..., LEGEND C STREET ENTRY nr+++ PREPARED FOR PREPARED BY PORTION OF C BTREET WEEP OF E COMET MEMO F-F Es,r-IEC ..., SECO.E-0 I. -- n.....u.ocrEl.... — .....—-- APPLICANT r. i■:«".: .....s......•■••L. I.....ou.na .....,.. REGENT PROF-MTH - ...-1.. ''' 1 1.7 II -4 -4..--;LL- ' 'La'''. 3 r r A ' — .......014100E -,r,s 0, mrsar IF•l•I FE+++..rt [ ••4 I IT.m• ,.,1 ,,,- .1--01, .zz 1::=1.--, Chor.-Eo+. . ...a,'... 41. .. .1.t.■ ar'".0 ' LiittoZ.1 [ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 36479 APRIL 09 2014 LK Ma Wit SEMI ON I. ...sal I a...-..(..S.. i00',EaR l" _ g ,�fl- ... ARBOR VISTA NOTES " �_ I TENTATIVE TRACT NO 36479 - -''Y ''''u+r l• — O f ' CITY OF TEMECULA, CA lC �.. • y TLOCATKlN DETAIL - ev -0-t , EL EII E - 1 'l-'�'_ -, .sEt..l T R OUIRED '� [ r ` .. 1 r.-..w, wo.-a.,ar.-w..... .. ,..•-, 1 _ �. .M�, . . • AMER OVA Fry liJ ((A511l. 'LJj0• RUE ralo• r R` 4`4 .N.r Oti. - n ' 1 1,$ r r- BUILDING MS AND MINIMUM SETBACKS• r -f4r ,` t " 5� I. - ,� {a ;- 1..:-...y.:. •: - { r , t j j . , 1 1•6 � 4 1 - \., � , 5 `�• tr ,9- t � . _ ',d,� :r " da. h {lire }} ; i w-, AREA COVERAGE---ri r �l. 411 -.. �s M-. m w' ' 1, 1 II' kS RF f• I . i M..'" -'''. ' ";--- . \\'...:' ¢¢1 \ .` . i - , -'"�"• - 5 l LEGEND mil\ p1 ix" 1_ I . r`_•> 1' . ,.- 41 - Vii` 1F . .: _ wl ` ° X u �.1r P . f.- •.:."#�. - 1?' .,e 17Y ..� r 1y y 1J v.x,x Il.r ti r• _, 1 , f V _- xYL A. t» it Alf bill blr filliii 111 liA '3 '..w:, ''',- . --_____3_';'-:::. -„1-.. -).,1,i 4. . , iii�1 F' t .� j It, AA �� 1, * ... mw.. �� � z - M �- r ..�,/M�uu '`,"'- �'"� _ lOT r_. �'� I �,._ti....... .fir LL..MN 1 ;..4 -.�.. - ` � t � .sf� - Ir a •1 +",#t ° � 'C ,o } �aftAi. ri !i6 PURL IL ti . trcr 0. .t �u, IT' �_'� � .. ,,+��--_- . t"p'.'s PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: a� � 41" PRI'd61t +rca - l` ,• - ' ' - • �`5 ct41t1 l"j t ■ ` - !`?_° -___.1 I4k. Sr miT r l _ 5 v-- a r� :,-... , J _o — - ___ PLAN `----- 5 ‘l'. r, 4 � _ _ _. SITE __r � �- --.... tr= s°" �`4 TENTATIVE TRACT 36479 I.r'� -:�`_-'4'—,•y_ -- ^°f• ,. APRIL 09.1019 5 r i _.---- �I - - I W ., '.4 1. 11r' 11111111:a - PLAN R w. PI.AN2 PLAN 3 d PLAN 4 •PLAN I a PLAN 2 - SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL vt lli 7 lY a a f. AN G a . El II r r r .• aM1 dr Jai — _ 0 e. A PLAN 3 PLAN 4 e. PLAN I PLAN 2 *.PLAN 3 i. PLAT I4 SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL [A1.O(20 REGENT PROPERTIES FRONT ELEVATIONS KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT S Los Angeles, CA 90049 INC. r Phone: 310-806-9800 ARBOR VISTA Job y: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, CA Suite 2614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 w w... I.• ^ Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 PI ;,,fir• •-„xa.,x ,,..a.N�so- - 1 r" — I I;1114/1-MUM 'u. __ s € ���3I si 1�r■ 1Q��' �� a :I�11 - , II I I A Ns--111111, LL „ L. _ 41- __ a x l 1 I . IEIl nl G.-.:..-::EE. ..a■ 1 Y 4.r Ilrkl ssdllmlllf I�I�It Imiw* Ni)♦ I . i I s -- III 1 $1111 i I I I I. ., : .. I. i I,f l r..; i , u s Q Y .1161 I PLAN f FLA FLA 'LA 4 I PLAN 2 SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL I ELI'. �.O ■ 111♦ ---- -71�� z 11! 11 19 *t. mll',.Itl_l�.1• ■I� i1�K —E 1IIi�P'J. ..,�,..it N� air IIIIIIIIIIIIf{�'I.,.i1 N Imo:: /: ��M4 rll�lllll.1ll 4 TIM I I I Al r;71; I ■' 7 RHIIIIJUIllJIMIJJ Illil1I L UIIIMWIIIIULIiU UUIIII111111IIUIIII ;, I PLAN 3 PLAN.1 PLAN I PLAN 2 PLAN 3 PLAN4 SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL SPANISH CRAFTSMAN TRADITIONAL 1. ,A1.0(3) 0 REGENT PROPERTIES REAR ELEVATIONS KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT S Los e:Angeles,10 0 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC. Phone: 310-806-9800 ""`"""`"' Date#Dec 2,8 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 w.COL wsr,pu Phone:ls949-6 0-1557 r. MA_- ., .,. ., ,.,�.,. - -- - Temecula. CA .!,= 4 la �.. 11PT.PATIO — __ _ M BEORl1 GatA l, 1 .,ny 11 ZOI I�1 — H Ik ���rCI3� 1 G 4. ,. .. 8 l $ C emxN.i I ° ,: 1 I 0 0 7 Il 19,v ■ 161.1 II AREA TABULAVON 1I {Fl 90199009P999 II ELOOR AREA 2318 50 FT TOTAL 1191/ELLtl0 2318 50 R. GARAGE HI.YY 1:99-90110110,90 VALI, 9099,E 419 SO R. 99.10-A,%V A-L 30 50 R pill wte Al.1 FLOOR PLAN w,. REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOKII 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 PLAN 1 ARCHITECT t Las e: ales, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA °ARCHITECT Phone: 310—BO6-9800 Job : 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds lrAne, Suite 110 CA 9 Date: Dec 2, 2013 P»1 L«.099 01.7013 Temecula, CA vine, 949-660-1587 r,Y,nkanilxue l mwrfl-*Am 2,R„.f,01.81.en 016 111111 'lli i _- I- SPANISH CARRIAGE LIGHT CRAFTSMAN CARRIAGE LIGHT TRADITIONAL CARRIAGE LIGHT OR EQUAL OR EQUAL OR EQUAL 1 •I SPANISH ROOF PLAN CRAFTSMAN ROOF PLAN TRADITIONAL ROOF PLAN ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 6:12 U.N.O. A1-2 ®REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 1 , KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT I Los Angeles, CA 90049 INC A Phone: 310-806-9800 ARBOR VISTA Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Dote: Dec 2, 2013 Irvine, CA 92614 AK ear.ON ilk V11 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 0 1 w a -,r' °-- •r N ---- ,—....- .--- --- . : 7 :k. I - ,fir .„,,, -•. --- ,. r - - I 1 II f ,.i- id 11Y F6N(F. 1 �fff Ll.. Ii u ,+ + "� M. ..-•of 1 ,L a 7 1, , 1 I1 11 LIRr: r RIGFIT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION it HAW "SPANISI F I l I I 1 1 1 1 1 I'K(1 1 1 1 1'S 1 1 PI((1\(RI I1 K1KR ...i It }11X1„11 Kurt* 41111111111 K 111111 .; ' IA IAN 0 1,,11.1 IIIK ' AKIS II��iirrl�I• 4llilt .II1NrinM PI 161.1114•IIl1,1114,,,K11,KS1 4, morels,.1\11111N 111161 yr y 1111:AI 11\!,11.11111 1,\n\1A+IK l l'RS1 !P 1 \I I ()1!11111. ,, r 111111VYI IPIIRH�IAKMK INKHt vyy/ k P iNT IrfP ii. ._ .._. ..�_,� _--.. _-.T y, • 1 13 \\.17..1'... - 11114 ' y 1 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A1-3 PLAN 1 0 REGENT PROPERTIES SPANISH KEVIN L.CROOK" 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT 8 Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA 1..1 INC. . Phone: 310-806-9000 Job fi: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, Suite Dote: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 VI N(E ,' iii, FEN(I' LEN(V „ LINE I I INF. LINE - 1, ' OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO PARTIAL RIGIIT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PARTIAL LEFT ELEVATION A1-4 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 1 SPANISH KEVIN L.CROOK I 11990 Son Vicente Blvd, Suite 200 ARCHITECT `e Los Angeles, CA 90049 INC I � Y Phone: 310-606-9800 ARBOR VISTA 0w Job #: 12038 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave, Suite 110 Irvine, Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 Y_ � S _ Ili I -.1., nr. 1 N RIGHT ELEVATION aoQ1U REAR ELEVATION Iwl "CRAFTSMAN 1 1 W'RI., 1111.11'PHR1.1711'1IS1RIT..S 11 mRl MALI. I I1%14 ...I%1INIVIISIMI[I141111 1i44 ILl1% ,1M11A 1,11.11 it.11.1+ I..0 I/"I,..ante liYa 4%l IRrAAl 11MIAI.. V.mps 11 111III Il.0.4m411114 INIIIFI1811111, 5.1� POI Altl f lll41V;1 M-1111is.I.RI1'Ufq !-,• 45MM1 8151.11455111p{l I. ___ MIlAR i1111^4't4gM'f1Axq,R 14r0 I Y{ h .Ix o—__� —»_T ______._ a _ °iq! _■ 9 Isla._ -IN-1ll —_� l.' _ - — _ X . I iiti #01 WM.f1F1M " I " Ili I 1I LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A1-5 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 1 CRAFTSMAN KEVIN L.CROOK 5 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT Poo Angeles, 0 90049 ARBOR VISTA Phone: eles, C 310-806-9800 INC. .1 Job 11: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave.,Suite 110 Doty: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 Temecula, CA. Phone:1r949-660-1587 I tom, T—. rTTTTTTT `sy..... — — —0 f LINE NL'F FEN(E `I �.I j ,d. V LINE � ..' ` _ LINF. LINE - .. 7?'--f 4- Il 16, , 1 , nom i iii i _ OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO PARTIAL RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PARTIAL LEFT ELEVATION 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 1 A1-6 • CRAFTSMAN KEVIN L. ROOKI1g , Suite 200 11990 San Vicente Blvd ARCHITECT Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA Phone: e one: 310-806-9800 c INC—s Job #: 12038 Reynolds Ave„ Suite 110 Dote: Dec z, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Re v Irvine, Temecula, CA Phone: 92614 one: 949-666 0-1587 y `y 1` non r, .. N 1 177" •"I 1'1 1"" 1 I- t 1- ,7!-. ;--. .,: vic,E. RIGHT ELEVATION l REAR ELEVATION . "TRADITIONAL _PIII II I LAi LNI AIL ilPL111,I NI-If N(NN TILL NA!LS Cat. N IA 110011 II RIM f111,110VI N'LRAM 511,IA1IIN•IASIN MOO IIL IAll n-PA\IS AND NANIN •, - • •+ MI II PANT II N INDIAS i lot VI NI o flel SWiIfINSIASduNa 1�, 110X1/04 St I SIS"x1ASIN UNSI ; �i •x. AVINIIN1 S i' NNIII MINIS SN ,1 I NSIM,4 NS) f f� - --- MINI TIII(I: {N,'^ - ry 4f IAL%MtH N.4YSI144 U1w W ^ Ir IL r.L - ' Iwrm■Nr- Vv�F 1a S ' I II , Ilia ii er47-,.-::.-2--'1,, ii i 1 I. I si.�.r Imo h�k>x� ' .*Y I —■4'1, .X11 i'l I 1 11011[1.11111 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A1-7 PLAN 1 REGENT PROPERTIES TRADITIONAL I KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT @ Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC. Phone: 310-806-9800 Ave.,`Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds , Suite 110 Dale: Dec 2, 2013 Irvine, CA 92614 Temecula, CA _ _ Phone: 949-660-1587 J • �' jr� F G 11.41 t ^ ' LIEF 1 9 I iliii 1 illiti I gi - OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO OPTIONAL PATIO PARTIAL RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PARTIAL LEFT ELEVATION 1 Al-8 PLAN 1 . -- REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOKI�g TRADITIONAL 11990 Son Vicente Blvd, Suite 200 ARCHITECT Los Angeles, CA 90049 INC.��o+ 2 Phone: 310.66-960 ARBOR VISTA e 110 Job //: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, CAIt92614 Dale: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 i 4 r 4 , Gvc,Ann `� i 1 ` 1i KITCHEN GREAT 800011 U‘ 1 lit _-=? 111 �j a j HALL 11 MINE. � AG. 't § i m i, us is I: 4r IPil ENTRY G'nY Y AREA TABULATION ( FdtIA1NAY MALI •+ • FAST FLOOR ARFA 1114 SO.FT let FLOOR PLAN'B'& ° LIARAGO SECOND FLOOR AREA 1412 50.F. n FM-� TOTAL LNIn1NC 5156 SO Fl u•xwtwa,1woarIAPM3 GRACE S49 50 FT 159 SO FL I=E ---_ A2-1 let FLOOR PLAN'A' O REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOK I1 rNc.11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 PLAN 2 ARCHITECT 8 Las e:Angeles,10 0 90049 ARBOR VISTA °`HIT -' Phone: 310-806-9800 Job # 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, CA 92614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 v4"w.ro1� Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 u4.-ur.n4 1ew+n02,dt. `, I 1>Pr.p�cK k 7 i! 7 _e_ —4 MBATI , ,..4,2 �bu`�r M.SevnT1 w.17.1- 7 I W.IC 1 ' OPTIONAL LOFT 3 E ij +1 w C7 C7 § ""LL EwaKr In' latafflf. In 0 lir NE - .) PAM! AREA TABULATION l m 1 ,1-:.. .4 t„,„„,.FSXYUV'ut !? 500050E BOOR EAREA 1472 50.FT TOTAL[0ELLNO 3155 50 FT r.on 41ION.OxmiF E I 04RA0E 49 50.Fr 139:O. f. OPTIONAL BEDRM./BATH _"" —`.....] " , A2-2 2ND FLOOR PLAN 0 REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOK I1 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 PLAN 2 ARCHITECT L Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA •,,--.INC.i Phone: 310-806-9800 Job #: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 rot 001.ON N.2012 Temecula, CA. Phone: 949-660-1587 rVegavitsitilepo4 Y+4win-tnm p 1pp-M-dl - - r II* III Oi- SPANISH CARRIAGE LIGHT CRAFTSMAN CARRIAGE LIGHT TRADITIONAL CARRIA(iti LIGHT OR EQUAL OR EQUAL OR EQUAL "Twit Tr 16.7 Ind 11 II" , 1 ti,‘ 111--egi w0 14t4A SPANISH ROOF PLAN CRAFTSMAN ROOF PLAN TRADITIONAL ROOF PLAN ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 6:12 U.N.O. PLAN 2 A2-3 0 REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOK • 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT II Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA -INC. 2 Phone: 12038 1360 Job #: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Date; Dec 2, 2013 Tract#36479 Irvine, CA 92614 nn N.0a 06 1013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 P.V,c,rxlLO,kY.ATM'44,4.44.4-444.44 W'002-0509 - - - — --_____ n: _ ,,,_ L1 I 1 ++ Li f'r' y i 4,1 Ij ��I �EfII AIL rc.1t t .,. lir - +H RIGHT ELEVATION a:uousen 1‘,0P- 1 REAR ELEVATION wow IM "SPANISH" 11- 41114It1 L 1.111111L1 11,1111,IlL II HOW / FAU IN WI.. _�-+-- TRIM sm.Cn nv.111nAA1 ' 4 IW "p nFl All A115A1n NAAFS — J� .- JJ ;`~-..•,, 4 ti. 1111 yl M.i•lllu - Y- —. .. -._. ...- _,-_._.._ 1 A, Wtl.l.w 1[111x„ -- -- —f II 1A1 Sf\ILF 11'1:1111 'TMA WON ' " ' '! .1 ,___,, ., I n , 1 tai ^J'__ , .LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A2-4 PLAN 2 0 REGENT PROPERTIES SPANISH KEVIN L.CROOK 1 11990 Son Vicente DIvd., Suite 200 D D ARCHITECT L Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC.Phone: 3es, CA "6'PI Ctoomme Job #:Dec 2, Tract# 36479 360 Reynolds Irvine, Suite 110 Date: c 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 "y . I , +Ir LI I TIM- LINT RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION ., t - - .yr l..a_. , is, rte- i } -_ -- .,c�-?.- I ,.fir• N - } T -- -$. --- .�A . I llal. --., , kik r J g4 LEE I.ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A2-5 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 2 SPANISH-OPTIONAL LOFT/OPTIONAL BEDRM,/BATH KEVIN L.CROOK • 11990 San Vkentc Blvd, '.Suite 200 ARCHITECT! Los e: 31 Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA 1NCT Phone: 310 806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job N= 120. Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Dote: Dec 2. 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 - III I I Ill_I '11I1114IIM111I61 III 11111 !' _ 1 FL'NC1 FENCE_ Y j FENCE � 1 I.INF LINE t LINE RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A2-6 0 PLAN 2 REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOK I1 SPANISH-OPTIONAL DECK ARCHITECT � 11990 Son Vicente Rlvd., Suite. 700 INC. f Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA °"^^'°`^'-- Phone: 310-806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job N:Dec 2. Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Dote: r 2. 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 _ r - I I 1 71.,fli • '� / '1./ .1( null }1pCk D 1.ilk _ A �1u 14\! :Y! • II RIGHT ELEVATION „ i . _ Iti.r. REAR ELEVATION ... - 111. -1an� WO "CRAFTSMAN t -- � '1.11,1111 AI fY1'LUMaifl iwor n, 1 1: y I n.Ye n411A 1Yl%%IW.Nl tt.1,,14l1YI.ILLV IMII ll! A4111WY1 f 1l WH,A IV*I ` ��� IWtA _ ,y ~ I141.1191 f1 t Ml ! _ �rS CoMbia MASH }A'B r I1r �I Ir s1. �i�rlli p ±a}I I M 4. r 4 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION i PLAN 2 lA2-7 0 REGENT PROPERTIES KEVIN L.CROOK. CRAFTSMAN 11990 Son Vicente Blvd, Suite. 700 ARCHITECT Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC. a Phone:Angeles, CA �wae.,..Nam.. Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Dale: Dec 2, 2013 Irvine, CA 9261 1 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-15V or if i I Li. i @.,r is z i !A _ Al • , 111111L1 .. fk i1 5 s �� tee— n RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION .'s."" �.aa r..r. K, p'^' - _ CRAFTSMAN — t LV,Ilnkr'11P1111,.1111fx1u 1111 - - .. .111 ,II,N.1111111 1.1"...• .w • VI �- M1-- –� u n e — --' '.t L-iiiiii , 111.l Api1 1n1 Ma it filar f1•-it i • i 1111 ik.;: :-r. '- e. r'' ail I LEE F ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION . A2-8 r REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 2 KEVIN L.CROOKS 11990 o Vu oeto filed, ';Mite 200 CRAFTS MAN-OPTIONAL LOFT/OPTIONAL BEDRM./BATH ARCHITECT e Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC. �`' Phone: 310 806 9800 ' Onto:J�: 120.38 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Onla: Dec 7. 2013 Irvine, CA 92614 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 :. , I �` _ L.' � iit !iii iv,1 FENrf: eeNrr 'rf - 1 -.� ilAe "'_ ....____E i�N i1N` no u,m ■i l _ _ ____. RIGI1T ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A2.9 PLAN 2 ` 0 REGENT PROPERTIES CRAFTSMAN-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT Ig Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA `°."IJ�C Phone: 1 0 806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job y: 120 2, Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Dote: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949 1in0 PA/ �� _ _� RiE°'' '''..#.4< • j 1 It-1 iI LW 11111 fh-olmm ,.,.1,11 II 1 f RIGHT ELEVATION I°'°�"" 'I" REAR ELEVATION 1-sµ� r}' °� , "TRADITIONAL i uu1n,,iau•,vn 4r,.rx1,x NI.„ n • ' nits VIIr. I nin In, �niunrv1xw,u • mina xi1 w�tiI.i�iixwsi i..r�xei r i.1 04,04101.1 V.111.0,4441 W, �..,'._ M1 �` ,t _ „y tiro `rr.xF nxnc i.>„x"e+� ,1.+.� �t " ti-- 1v It r P [Ir Fij r I 1 I �.4.: 1 ,IMIIL 1.11.1 M.I 1 i 1 I� I1 �� -r�.I fIII��� LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION ' +I 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 2 �� . TRADITIONAL KEVIN L.CROOK F 990 Con Vicente 31vd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT I Angeles, C:A. 90049 ARBOR VISTA INC. Phone: 510-806-9800 Job //: 12038 c�.rSuite +11 Oslo: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360. Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Irvine, Temecula, CA Phone: 949—60-1587 — ...4. --7 __- 1m i � j .._...." ,__,,41,1 � _ :I___ _ . ... . Dr ,N RIUIIT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION �... y.' i 7r, - _...„ TRADITIONAL 0 ....=- -+ _ _. ,.a. 'i �`_ `µ n 1111111N/\1%1 1 11,111190,911 HSI NY` inn �•�^�. ;fi t w i pon mk_a.M I !��,� wi+ltii+9111 ri,n1 .vw u"rY r ,y u - "I- ` . N i II n L I liar. _: —1 � I' - – . .! '.,. { +• 4 i��l { �ti,1. i�. xY r JI - _ - II1� ..II mail_ 0 11 111111111 LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION 1 A2-11 o REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 2 KEVIN L.CROOK g 1 1990 Sari Vieenle Blvd., Sidle 200 TRADITIONAL-OPTIONAL LOFT/OPTIONAL BEDRM./BATA ARCHITECT 5 ARBOR VISTA r.INC. toe An+oales, CA 90049 ��^+° "` Phone: 120 80(1-98(10 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job ll: 12038 Tract# 30479 Irvine, CA 92614 Dole: Der 7, 7013 Temecula, CA _ __ Phone: 949-660-1587 - - 1 18-14°'°"?' ''''';''''''Ir..* :72'x'"'7''''''''''''''' '' ''''4444N1"-- —---. c•-•1.'" _____ 1 L �.i� s • .. • I11,��" �_' [�7I nisi _ VIII_. ff.,\'('I FL\'fC - f AM ii FF�h(,ti:.: A 114L LINT_ M € 1 owl.' I� !! LI\4 rfM 1a •-__ - RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 2 A2-12 11990 San Vicente f31vd., Suite 200 TRADITIONAL-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK r Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARCHITECT IG Phone: 310-806-9800 ARBOR VISTA INC. BB Job y: 12038 `°, Suite _" Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave„ Suite 110 Temecula, CA 9 Irvine, 92614 Phone; 949-666 0-11587 r I01.1 1TRI ■ IN X I j1 t'saAtl. NOOK GREAT ROOM %aV.r 14 I ;V' rre" .,,_ r� p. A E a;'K.. °` I r Rl - __- 0, f ,gin I MIr I ENTRY II 0 M i RATN3 AREA TABULATION I PORCH 44414.11TRg130 4,AT FAST FLOOR AREA 1]06 SO.FT Rmpµq FLOOR AREA 1104 5<] Fi _---. - --_u L. Lt11A1 NI 11 l092 50.n i >w tta nfO8AIY IIt/ ly -1 GARAGE I 92t y1 R GARAGE 2 195 SO PORCH 29 SO FT. p •.. —, A3-1 T I- 0 REGENT PROPERTIES 1ST FLUOR PLAN KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 PLAN 3 ARCHITECT If.rnc. Ph Angeles, 8.A 98049 ARBOR VISTA cr..*s.* Job is 310-806-9$00 ��� y. 1203$ 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Octe° Dec 2013 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 MN Oda,Ova CC MA Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 -y:.,.4 Y /9 -¢test/A "..VIA _ I •MI.IMwl_ . I •BmRM. M BY.II 1. 0 0 grail -•• Ins" wry 0 ,,, slaw . a 0 Ir.. -- IIHIII r:::r ,0 - A, --4,,i .. tTN'R4MI. 1 B a T- I AREA TABULATION ■11■1r-- I J1•p11CT*avMi F `F1RS1 FLOOR AREA 1198 50.FT II1I FLOOR AREA 1100 SO TOTAL DWELLING 2492 SO FT 1 GARAGE I 921 50.FT. GARAGE 2 195 S0 PORCH 29 50 Fl. OPTIONAL BEDRM./BATH 1� E _ E A3-2 . 0 REGENT PROPERTIES 2ND FLOOR PLAN _—.__ ---- 11990 Son Vicente Blvd, 200 PLAN 3 KEVIN ARCH TEOCTIS Las Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA I''`c- Phone: 310-806-9600 Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Irvine, CA 92614 1103.D.A .011 2013 Ittom -TeYIlecula. CA Phone: 949-660-1587 ■ I* III III 1 UMmimmml SPANISH CARRIAGE LIGHT CRAFTSMAN CARRIAGE LIGHT TRADITIONAL CARRIAGE LIGHT„„id,OR EQUAL OR EQUAL OR EQUAL .„,„ ., i iho 1 L I ., L Al .. 1 1 SPANISH ROOF PLAN CRAFTSMAN ROOF PLAN TRADITIONAL ROOF PLAN ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 6:12 U.N.O. 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 3 A3 3 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 KEVIN L.CROOK Los Angeles, CA 90049 R VISTA ARCHITECT t. Phone: 310-806-9800 INC.ARBO VSTA Job #: 12038 °°"'� Dote: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 nu ow om 04.ems Temecula, CA Irvine, 6 92614 15 7 rw,..g1 0.1cA.a r..,.s..-va..ral.Nyw-wrr, Phone: 949—660-1587 S'. in 4 I /3 . S..-'. la , , , :, 1,7, i - -- r1iRf f: hl.ec a Y.' I LYl LIWIi 7 RIGHT ELEVATION , „W„ Melia REAR ELEVATION II °, , "SPANISH" F`: Ipm11 I:PIII IIIOW YKd*III'S'It'YI InT(mI II NW( �`� 1 }'� MAlls ssµl10 .1 f 114,5 (11(1004,1110A11 r' -,___ -.�__ ix.i tit 0'1.14,15 AM(11nx11 11Y,55,1,w451kM• _ ,41111.511l1161R 51 msi ° it 11 1 1 (11•(0. I 511 a.4.WOlua Um. .p1 � i}rUr.,r, . ,,,,,„,i. _ __,.., .__, ffiL.,4, , , __,...„ . ! _,,,,,„„ i ii , 1 . ,,s-.,pr; - ► LEFT C ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION . A3-4 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 3 SPANISH KEVIN L.CROOK ARCHITECT i 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 INC.Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA c ......... Phone: 1 0-806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job g: hose Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 949-660-1587 Phone: 949— Temecula, CA r 'I��I{ f { %- I JY- 11 . I.ir , I.t�•If I� I 1 f �_ �T. �..., I - �M fL.,. .. ..C, �_� �1�1 II l�1�1I�!l >I I�1 I . _ - - - - - r MC' I.N{'e F. - Ignq:- - LINC I " LINf LILAC . i W '.- 1 111 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION 1 A3-5 1 0 PLAN 3 REGENT PROPERTIES SPANISH-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK II 11990 Son Vicente Blvd„ Suite 200 ARCHITECT 1 Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA .�,,. .C,.:., Phone: 1 0-806-9800 Dot N:Dec , Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, Suite 110 I Date: r; 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 NMI --- - ,-.....■•. ------. --..---.... - , ,. ---- .11IPP.P-- .....----. - ..,_ .....„._. ,--411-417. 1 ,- . , 1 i _ 1 • , Ii• , __,•:: • . __ _ - - . ill 111111111- -111 . , FEll j 1[ tr UT 1 jEl_ 0.',r',' I IL_ .- • Riui ri ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION s- :...:;.;'.. .. -'-:. (RAE t, -..-. -,..9.,, MI, 5-0, .•1. ..,,,....., I .W,.. -4 4 •' . F TSMAN -- . '".-ch.401 .'. . . WIN .1,4111,11I-.W.itilliN HI II HMI HI , ,....-'• _.. Wilk MA40,1 01.111,1,0111 MI, M. NH ' UM j;iia—,__Al ,. (INUNIA111,,,SIN,11, MINI iritOls,DIAWS kit11111,1Mxit, I.r. —..,1 iii,I.111.1 M1,1111,1,1,,1,1i, ..e.11111.1111111.• IltilltlialiAll,S1111, .-- .. WIPIIII.511M,",.1,Ntili, , 1 •“MM1,41,,11.1111XliSA11.11. . ill i i ,11 1, . ._.. ■Il Ini Sit1,111 11 It 1i/0,1011,011N .. . -A.S ..— :-.7_7- . ... • 4 4 IA . . __ . • , -, • .104ir 9,4 .... .-A 1010FONOwle wir,40141.--.. „ ..• , 1 ,.. _ . II.Ntl. - 111114-0-■-1 1 IVA - y 1"4 1%. 111 1 ' . - -- L II mtatta,_ 7,' t$41 Ai. • Ili ,. V..- 1)110/ 11111, ftri _ - At ' L , . ..G A,',A1 . " ' ' • ' ' EL, LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A3-6 i I PLAN 3 0 REGENT PROPERTIES CRAFTSMAN KEVIN L.CROOK•5 11990 So: Vicente Blvd. Suite 200 ARCHITECT t Los Angeles, CA 90049 INC. Photie: 31 0-666-9800 ARBOR VISTA ,o, ll: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Tract# 36479 Dote: Dec 2, 2013 Irvine, CA 92614 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 1 v �4 ______ ,_ _ . ",„ fl , 1 i JJ �I CC - i I'€NU: 1 11411 '1 II]( rtncc - III ,II IINI IIYP r F/ �MI LIYL ��r "� OHM Mi1� . - -- _ RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A3-7 PLAN 3 O REGENT PROPERTIES CRAFTSMAN-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK I 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT A Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA L °C. Phone: 310-806-9800 e 110 Job u: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, CAIt92614 Dole: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA _ Phone: 949-660-1587_,I, _ - - - '� f a [ ,1 H�. 1 1 _U . ,_,. lall VI 11 IA I U ...- _ _ - t TO .' RIGHT ELEVATION - REAR ELEVATION w4 "TRADITIONAL r' w41 w'•�"'� • NY PI IIIA•.1.111 VII111MNI:•x111111111 11�°• HAIR 11„1'1 f 111 44 MIN ..11.1,111.1111111,1 + - 1111\IAI1111•1Atilx l l,k\1 YII Vile '-I 111'1 11111111 v1111111x 1 1.11 x01 1 111 11 1-11.1 1,111'11111,..,1,1 x\1 I - 100111111/ 1x/1\\' 11.111x11 ,11111kx1 ' I `I 9f �4p�I` P wxlw�l\: 11. 4t. y, ..! :':cd II #'f �1I,. I I A\ 11x11 / 41 j1�-.,- 1.111:11 x111\1x`111 IlAI 1 xYlx { _ M y.k 111 II x 11x11 ' —4,= E{1 1} `— s1 F 1111 k —L - �1�ry1• 1 lI r.��• 1! +=+1N I - I L=J= •!. .1 {1. 1 ma - It Sul�If� i — ¢-- a mmm.. • LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A3-08 PLAN 3 0 REGENT PROPERTIES TRADITIONAL KEVIN L.CROOK• ARCHITECT 71990 San Vicente F.31vd., Suite 200 IN_C- Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA x_, Phone: 1 03806-9800. 1360 Reynolds Ave.,,Suite 110 ��6 #: 12038 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Dale: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 rte,:.=: — no r [l II 'IiIIIII r�a 11 �1I II I1�'II'lilla — I!;'; NH x — iLIIIHr - - -- It I I Lr9CL rhNU �`. I _.. _. IIaC , I �.-JI .�� I'.IP Llvl j ! � `�� ' 1 RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A3-9 ALAN 3 0 REGENT PROPERTIES TRADITIONAL -OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK `g ARCHITECT I 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 � Los Angeles, CA 9049 ARBOR VISTA INC.«m �- Phone: 1 03808 9800 1360 Reynolds Ave.. Suite 110 I Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Phone; 949-660-1587 I Temecula, CA --- -• a �.. 1 OPT.PAl y I PI 1 NOOK II r,Yy ,•'••y OIEAT000M 114 SOCON r# 77111r,:::Swif/111 0 M BATH 2 0 li 0 Tk-sir rA Ch N. t WIC. ? 1.i .. .. —� UWN'a 11 I AREA TABULATION p32.1.1trWON NMI E�RSI PLOOR AREA ].19T 50.R �'�'��� � SECtMO BOOR AREA 1,5TO SO n n-4--A.,,9 — IOTAL DWELLING 3.71P SO.n , .. 1ALi 1 rannell R,]FALAiri� _ E.I. ' ePORcH fi0R 50.fT ��r POACH S0. f POACH BWRM.4 0 REGENT PROPERTIES 1ST FLOOR PLAN O---- ----- I ` PLAN 4 KEVIN L.CROOK i 11990 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT 8 Los Phone:Angeles,10 0 90049 ARBOR VISTA `...f ACT-.+s Phone: 310-806-9800 Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds lrA e., Suite2110 DDate: Dec 2, 2013 NO 003 Mb WC 1014 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 r-s E Mt DMA 1 f r - R ' DEDYM3 .R WJC W.L 0---V i] -: FAN � Jo ..:r-. 004 .k11 --i' . %mg Mr 0 01i 1&]'; • l W Lf 1 cnrwr L r LIII Dm r4 DED&M,,1 AREA TABULATION I I. in TOTAL KL . 3.717 SO Fr Lei�iJ 1�. SECOND FLOOR PRFA x,5)0 SD FI Lei iJ �1 TOTAL DryELLWO S,II)i0 FI CARADE 619 xi FT. PORCH 95 SO F1. OPTIONAL BEDRMJBATH 0 REGENT PROPERTIES 2ND FLOOR PLAN A4-2 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 PLAN 4 KEVIN L.CROOK i Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARCHITECT Phone: 310-806-9800 ARBOR VISTA mac' i Job 12038 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 1360 Re v O711 Osr.Cm OP.bo Irvine, CA 92614 r.a�s n- rs�.LFw._or.1.y Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 ■ Oh • III 111 1_ t'I' SPANISH CARRIAGE LIGHT CRAFTSMAN CARRIAGE LIGHT TRADITIONAL CARRIAGE LIGHT OR EQUAL OR EQUAL OR EQUAL ditial 1161 AllitiAl WAG„._..... 1 SPANISH ROOF PLAN CRAFTSMAN ROOF PLAN TRADITIONAL ROOF PLAN ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 4:12 U.N.O. ROOF PITCH 6:12 U.N.O. 'i A4-3 0 REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 4 KEVIN L.CROOK g ARCHITECT ¢ 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 �C, � Poo Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA ° °�°-~--� Phone: 1 310-806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110. Job q: 1zo 2, Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Phone: 949-660-1587 ,A oru o«ai mu Temecula, CA _Y*4.±�.rmst_Rxr,+vrcenu�;[el.7r..n0-01+-r r ~a 1 + , i, I I,Nti . y eIV II MI I[n1. - .. RIGHT ELEVATION _ _ VIM REAR ELEVATION mx u. , -- "SPANISH" -11:11101 IN I•x I I I\ Y III HIN1 r NMI'. 11„4 N1 111\1 I1,110VIxll1,1 ,: �' _ IN 1,11 I.IA\I snv111\ , 1'• Y 1..;, I II ISI 1 Nllx, NI1 I SL S1111 S1'11110 11.111.'011111,011 It 'lour a a ,,.„ , ,,1. _II likii. tr' , { - l s' 1r t - ' ^11x1 -� .u1 '''.: 1:�■. �t .'1. , � "' LEE I'ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A44 PLAN 4 o REGENT PROPERTIES SPANISH KEVIN L.CROOK s 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 700 ARCHITECT IE Las Angeles, 0 98009 ARBOR VISTA ��..-INC.. .�N Phone: 3103 806-96.00 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job N: 17o, Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Date: G&-c 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 J F MI '1 , . . , E 11 , 1111 111111 FI\CE it ,11` EEN(Il EI.N['E — I INI LI\li Llt.l. 1 'i I• �'--may 1: ' • J — ' , - _._--- - — . - RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A4-5 I PLAN 4 REGENT PROPERTIES SPANISH-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK `g 11990 San Vicente Blvd, Suite 200 ARCHITECT Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA °""" e�.. Phone: 30806-9800 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job .N: 12038 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Phone: 949-660-1587 mos Temecula, CA JaitH 1F-q , , , . , . ._. 7 1 rt. , 11 14 11 I( 1 ll1 t1V T *1 HSII 1 -- Er L. ,.._ Li.,,. a,uaaror >s RICil I'I'ELEVATION Y _ _ e1 REAR ELEVATION W;—_. *POP „M. ,..% wry o .,.rte...- - -1 1 ':'" . .r:y e.Y,. .,. "CRAFTSMAN ..," • I II 1,11,1111 11,11.1'111.1111,pill 1.11 1111 _ NU +J i..,....1 1 S IN ?MU '411700,1110W 71,1177111101 s?1,1171 IN •ice.,r^` mot` •,"w 1IIY 17.11710.1% I NI\MN .I,Ir I f 111 I H,1N1I 1 1 11 I III y'i A 11 ,tiN11`111 N1`N1� ln1NM,Ixx1x iiii ii ___1_�',.1 IR' ��[rS'� "'1. !! �+�•.4r r. �ililelwIIPiM s14!1._�.,,. A1rl wo Ili .ri.. _ _ LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A4.6 1 O REGENT PROPERTIES PLAN 4 I CRAF'T$MAN KEVIN L.CROOK g 11990 Son Vicente HIVd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA CiN�e.-_,' �. Phone_ 310-006-9800 Job #: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 1 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 - - p _. I r,,,,,„„ _ Ei , . ILA LI..... y. I _ I J i } t6 rl:ncr rend l I II. I' .�1.II 111 C N 1 in 1L1 la I L�. InNr LI�I: RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION A4-7 PLAN 4 0 REGENT PROPERTIES I CRAFTSMAN-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 Son Vicente Blvd,, Suite 200 ARCHITECT I Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA 0 'e Phone: 310-806-9E300 Job #: 12038 Tract# 36479 1360 Reynolds Irvine, CA 92614 Dale: Dec 2, 2013 Temecula, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 - -- - ,,,,,,,i;F---'' '.....„...... r. 1 ,3 , r , _ _ ,1 _.,........ iiii4. .±_l" i 1. Ili _ . _ `` 1 W IhI {-f---IISI I 11 III 1 . . .. _______, ._ .RICiI IT ELEVATION I -. REAR ELEVATION WNW ,.yft v.1.•f. 1 "TRADITIONAL a`;yF xr� ../' �. MN* 1',AII.MI I11 LN,ax 111 r rA` NMI% 1 I r r..111 4.1N111 ..- r..111 4.1N111 '...... ,s 1.1 I n1111 14 • I I I\1nln,1.1 11“N,1 !WPM! A1,1,U 11-1615 H M IIN, we- _. • _.. _-_ `• 11 INFI 11 116 1 N _ _.�- r�r.== - "'_ - 11141,0.11'01N 1111 161 -I fAl , , t1H,l . mµ ..Y; gvYN I' Al i 14..., - _ NI 11.0,1.,111 1 1 11 MIN I � -��.., l L.. --Ip - . -_ ahR Ras •—$ N„ ri -� r.-.,w` HU _ _ — �:IIY � .Lill IM 1 hi I uu 1 l�r ".I I. LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION • A4-8 PLAN 4 0 REGENT PROPERTIES TRADITIONAL KEVIN L.CROOK g 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 700 ARCHITECT,. ARBOR VISTA INC. Loc Angeles, CA 90049 rg..w I+�.w�-. Phone: 310-106-9800 2, 7_013 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 Job Dote#.Der.: 170+8 Tract# 36479 Irvine, CA 92614 : TCllleCllla, CA Phone: 949-660-1587 J- R I . n Il i . 1� Illlil l lll H IIIIIIIIIIIII 11III] _ 1 xi, ncc f RA 1 1 I ,04. !lI+III J RIGIIT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION PLAN 4 A4-9 0 REGENT PROPERTIES TRADITIONAL-OPTIONAL DECK KEVIN L.CROOK 11990 Son Vicente Blvd., Suite 200 ARCHITECT I[ Los Angeles, CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA Phone: 310-806-9800 INC. s Job N: 12038 1360 Reynolds Ave., Suite 110 I Date: Dec 2, 2013 Tract# 36479 Temecula, CA Rhone:949-660-1587 _ t • , k. __. \, , . .... _. , , , , ,..., ., .,..„,. . ... .. . . .. . ,. te. _ 101,4`sL ,. ,_„.1.--- . ‘, ,. ,,,,,,•,.. , . _...,•*.„ -. ll '�h y RDA S t fi " pP© . No e it. fit` ,—�'' " tw As _ '1 - _ aTv Y t or-, i � ' '• ''�'i1 1 r k X11 A`-...,- I•_� *'''•7 -'4, 0 pi , T,fPers R-}. . 1 x'`•1`1!!"' I , 'J�' ,�� '! e_k y � � 1 F4 , - r --,.,'..°.f . YS l,.6.a * •�1 r„s'-, '. A'� �' R faR , ,y� r y S a �`, ,--- sr�r�� r-a r�}r°�f , ' " Yr yy '! S/ 1 1 Ate w, �` �7r '�, i � r`r,_ sip- ..• i l r 0 lb 1, .-;: bp -� * � � j ar :. v '� " r'" `I .�q fy^e Lit''''' -� ;, ' .off �4�',rif N 4W "i y Y 0 4l `'-1 - - �, , - ' - w•-..„. _,.... . . i , , ... . - , ft,„ '-'' . fir" Qrit- ',. _ _ % .sa 4. y r -,,,,,._.4,,,,"., r. 1 ' . �d' it. y lam' y L.. • `- ; ` ' 'L ' , a i —'°° 83 PLACEWORKS 0 1000' • CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND HY REGIONALTRAIL/CLASS I BIKE TRAIL 5 SIDE -5'SIDEWALK 3 RAIL FENCE WITH STONE PILASTERS -5'DECOMPOSED GRANITE CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES u,un<al Nem., C.rumor.Name • Fsretr loafs-rv:atAs w}Elsra WO INC WO .,e,.rxwa, stns-,nw ln. a.Fos en'0 C rM,earam r (''\\J mrrtocmnensls mesa vs+ame Memum ul-•- f F c a �- l 11x, EEl n� NICOLAS VALLEY MONUMENT �l rw nu c H Tree Re-Pox Ore/lot Medi Cann, a , (AAA 'r'. CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS , varnrs-v rs,Oa'Nave/pc/0F'Nave/pc/0F RrsArcrorl wr NIcriirpn VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES ° 5' "ti Lar•rue r R s n .e ', I Low nn nn I D PARKING SPACES FOR PARK aFtreo v I. ua " r a O'tM1S+M' `* ! F'w C Y -JP,e Ihtlumm/Law t''.1 fr 't;;.°.,.. Fyn,ca-ry s'cnanrre L er r M.... £ .. 'r4! R': q/r .n Ch.nese E•m ra ',mu., �y JT { n'�1II .,,p/� t. N YAif lli i,815 � I +7) FLple0 dirk I ee 1e' MpeS+larl 12,1u1 it DETENTION BASIN �.rri� rrF� ! J�} r� �� y 1"�f SPLASH PAD WATER PLAY AREA +<ovr.w�t Artln Pal" rnen um `. lVi,111wiR xlaea Pe MY le Mc�um .4, p��1r rs a ; laurel Crmery M•arrn Dm Psv•es -``��, NATURAL SLOPE AREA 19.99,190.-.4 To C,+ van Palm v,eluu,/Low ARBOR VISTA COMMUNITY _ t � } � d+l I'��'� i3{�� 1ya:yKq„v�+w„isy Wash nelun car van WITH NI NTCONSLTE DESIGN rrs Tiiccawi�g,,yyy, , ,tl�P't r + v\-_,•WITH GUIDELINES SVALLEY DESIGN e• ^ ra 7•, n LANDSCAPE TREES GUIDELINES lye .^' ~ '� ti^ ;,, PRIVATE TRAIL CONNECTION FROM STREET C AtT:awonasmn Sieve ssfacn A•,0y uar*t M<uum t 4.100-,& ' 'r r p ,v - 'Pan wan,. GATED COMMUNITY ENTRY I •? ate S_ i v us Cr m,on :leEmuvm e+aa um/Cow ''t' r 6 f 1 V ` c n Pe err cee.. Meoum NIRchunr 6'DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1Sifi�s. }� 1 yF (�' ;�1 „r{y"'.0 { I �}.. C s Eastern Meaum/low REGIONALTRAIL/CLASS II BIKE 6'r1 L -3:5 ..e V1 1 "i I - -1 D'C'#1.-�r 1 f li° I a parAllsra y swe'�ila�w°W Medium u,m PrAr LANE(TO BE PRIVATELY \ '1'•••L- 1 I{l •• 9L ti'' o It.;-41 A� .. �tI v la n a Swee vaun 11 I - a v eti`,.;•,;.------A r naLanu C + s oak nom Medium MAINTAINED) .d 111' FAti {„f l .rr; 4 t' ame rasa ,n:a Ti �r y -...7,-.10"`' e•ro a Low V6{; {F F 1,p e � � II '- Fl,rs lan.ea Alr-an Sumer Mceun/Low WITH 3 RAIL FENCE CONSISTENT '' 1IR , ` �� FT 'tl7 �~ 1y ti L- Scn ,s Ierel.-nLhmrc us Aire anvevrr es Maum/Low t� GUIDELINES LINES SVALLEY DESIGN •'. �� •+ip,' - r ,�tt ► 1 %)..1 +T � �� �• s:RUxs lee es pa:J•rl plank Fs,/ lYi5K ��.., REGIONALTRAIL exrunucavCR la-•ern=n•eo Pam Esq GUIDELINES .�. qqq ^lei 4 I I 1 �' ., a” fl."1�-• V 111 r� y 1 _ - Vt 1�4et��"i CONNECTION mo I 11 Iir ft�t '1 :t - VINE,lseeap.�a Nan,lsu• GATED COMMUNITY ENTTY 1 rc ` #A ' 4' ,1 r r i t41y' k }A; r +.\ ,':1 . `44T?yy- f,� II�•• pit N.11 fE t - - • a5j �, F '�-• of �1�. ARBOR VISTA COMMUNITY MONUMENT ':• alYr Il fr1-- r P Al '" •'R�+. ,� / `- CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN �y. �) 17- GUIDELINES �y 1C'� tit 'If,° I 1 — �-+ {S'�lK � �a� 1 �~-�-`'4- REGIONALTRAIL CONNECTION 8'DECOMPOSED GRANITE REGIONAL TRAIL - ----r -.= iy. s--- (TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED) - ��-•� t/rte'„ f USRISTICTIONAL BOUNDARY - - k �+, r DETENTION BASIN ,' \ '- J ..../- ._ - VV �"r • 100 YEAR WATER MARK BOUNDARY ' �'_• ''� -f - y`•_,...'� ,‘ I �� � .1 / ' Not0rTlns graphic to an artist%interpretation of the appllcalon of the Arbor Vim dmvelopment I - _ - e,{I atandsrdr and Is not w be Taken as the final design of cornputsory in nature.T11¢ttrui design !7 I' rhsil be reviewed t ing their gnphlcs as guidance;howwerr verzatinns In the placement.10001101. •- ' N ,�r1 - sryh,Ina serials,and colors st expecred as allowed In PAP-13.The types of plants shown shall f-•• M __ _ ,t comply with 5octtan 17.S.O9A of th�TaEnocols Municipal Code..The uRierlar ti eatm.alt of any V 4 �/'.r strucnrras.fames.or monuments may way as allowed in P00-13. PATE 0.112019 83 LOT ILLUSTRATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN lot REGENT GELES PROPERTIES 11990 SAN VICENT BLVD.STE 200 l'] //�t �y� pl/�'" - LOS ANGELES,CA 90049 p�,/yCE WOfS l�J ARBOR VISTA I TEMECULA,CA 310-1306-91300 NICOLAS LROAD THEME CK NCE �Cp1s 7 � Y. ,k 7 VENEER PILASTERS -n- tog WHITE 3 +' y.11 , . t ` X — PATH TO STREET"C' ,'. C.' 41 '. DECOMPOSED GRANITE REGIONAL TRAIL/CLASS I BIKE 1 ' `.40° Oil' ' -,9". ,p cot TRAIL 1f fir . .y R! ' l , — PARKING 5'CONCRETE SIDEWALK I '�' a TURF v �.r J' 10 PARKING SPACES FOR ', 5'DECOMPOSED GRANITE I 1*-'''''", r i' '�' i PARK Cyr k - ,, SPLASH PAD WATER PLAY AR ', � ''�. 4F ., ,e ,,K1/4111- ../ - ~` �° , ---w`v.SHADE STRUCTURES '� STORAG- , r_ k 1 ,,1 iii li in' 1»� i,' s '� ! \ TANK �Y is•" ,,,, . jj ��� �r TYPICAL PICNIC AREAS ill SHED 4� 1 •`i;• +t y.� '� 1' ill, — TABLES,BARBEQUE GRILLS DETENTION BASIN "; _ 'rti►� i�1 .0 1 11 lI {� j� � 1 1 II EXISTING EASEMENT \' -..t I ,° j' ,► ,/ ` .1/4 's NICOLAS ROAD PARK(Public,privately maintained) r , M ,I. Ji °,� 'tip � 1\-.''` � °4.r� ' ''.-f 'f*'" H° ' , ' `f t.}.' .14 . ++ ' 1, • � '` : i e # y, ' ,t zr :� 1 ; _ , d x_-y_� j ' ry�_ a - -< -.71'' . - — _ ,U . -....__2 _� W -.` ' ' ` _,-- KEY MAP EXAMPLE OF PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION WITHIN THE PARK EXAMPLE OF POTENTIAL NICOLAS ROAD PARK FURNITURE Note:This graphic is an artist's interpretation of the applicaion of the ArborVista development standards and is not to be taken as the final design or compulsory in nature.The final design shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variations in the placement,location,style, materials,and colors is expected as allowed in PDO-13 The species,size,and number of plants shown shall comply with Section 17.32 090 of the Temecula Municipal Code.The exterior treatment of any structures,fences,or monuments may vary as allowed in PDO-13. NICOLASROAD PARKVIGNETTE ,K1-'''', DATE 04 10, REGENT SAPNVIC NT1BLVD.STE200 pLACEVVORKS ARBOR VISTA I TEMECULA,CA LOS 8116-9 S,CA90049 .�Y 1 t� 1' � ,T, ,r/�/� �Il ll�F � ,_ �. -- A ` U :N : x rte j �Ie:. \il I '. Mi wq, . SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND RENDERING* SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND RENDERING KEY MAP SHED -`-vim} J ,. rl,r r : qM N. 'llf. 3 RAIL FENCE WITH la l a. i T' �, -_ _� -- STONE PILASTERS •.,r �+, �` �` CONSISTENT WITH '4'1 ', r~ --• ��o I� `e rl� I NICOLAS VALLEY w k�� 4 DESIGN GUIDELINES Or --�' • �eefAIIIIIIIIIImiL -- PICNIC AREA t� "'4 I,, - R SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND RENDERING* �* SPLASH PAD WATER ;v t i ,. PLAY GROUND �. AV /'� r A,,. — SHADE STRUCTURES 7 ; " VN ,+. . �r'r Y gay- - ••L__y•, '.-1 ,I�...'1 7' - / sie, t r M y p,i , 1 r p f1 \ � It 1 ',J t . ,T {.1 r'.nom;_,ii-x ■ 1 ,�* .� STORAGE TANK �- SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND ' SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND RENDERING* 'Note:Rendering images are provided by Vortex Aquatic Structures International Inc SPLASH PAD WATER PLAYGROUND VIGNETTE REGENT PROPERTIES he DATE ai:709 REGENANVICENTBLVO.STE300 PLACEWORKS LOS ANGELES,CA 90049 ARBOR VISTA ITEMECULA,CA '°a XL4-0L 3n-o"rrr OP, ,�. ,� U, ► J ROAD 261 L A S � ^ N I �O �ilra 1 z ADA �. ACCESSIBLE "'' RAMP 10 PARKING SPACES FOR IIIIIII,��'�'',..-` PARK r. ,� PUBLIC PARK _- - (TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED) LOT 91 f' PUBLIC PAP < 6 . 4 AC. DETENTION BASIN NICOLAS ROAD PARK PLAN t. i{ l '1;A-51:.v ,,. , . i II 9r%. 9 - P .l /ma am' FINISHED FINISHED SURFACE PLAN VIEW FRONT ELEVATION PERSPECTIVE VIEW SIDE Fl EVATION SHADE STRUCTURE PLAN VIEW AND ELEVATIONS Note:These shade structure drawings are a pictorial representation of fabric and steel only.None of the required attachment or connection details have been depicted All dimensions and heights must be field verified prior to any final design,fabrication or Installation work NICOLAS ROAD PARK AND SHADE STRUCTURE ('I 'N 11 ENTPROPERTIES RATE 04112014 ICENTELVD.STE 100 l09 REC-lal LOS ANGELES,CA 90049 ®PLACEWORKS ARBOR VISTA I TEMECULA,CA 31. 115 9111111 " �' } t.r, it — — r �'1 k 1 .•<'°} ✓'.!,. `;ltd s r;,- \ . ;q4 °*.a If A I 1 1I If'7 / I.!-, i i t> .^4,.',,/ ir ,. .",,,,k:: 4R ' -... tr _ 1,_f�.';#, OM r v.. ,�, -,,,+•. `�. 0 ARBOR VISTA COMMUNITY MONUMENT 1 j +r RIVER ROCK VENEER CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES ,Jf • 1{ a &eL j' SL ffyy�� '_f`fit-.' ] ,max' { .‘i,\ ✓k'�hR � rf '� p�1� y; s 'fit �., fi '+E ¢+df Y ``,� *y '!.. 7 �t ` l� A n W •— __,.,,r1 ,y..�. A t• j -S� --1 'V'�=S~m ti j bV'JI RJ sop ,tY en 0 ARBOR VISTA COMMUNITY MONUMENT ••^••••^ RIVER ROCK VENEER PILASTER CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES i i ililliri lir. inn a a 11M Nor la MI AMIIIII■= Mil 14704s!'llt,..;11:irijr40,,-. 04,41,40%-_,jklit304.11riliv.41‘,, . - ;r . 0 NICOLAS ROAD THEME FENCE 0 ARBOR VISTA COMMUNITY THEME WALL 3 RAIL WHITEVINYL FENCEWITH RIVER ROCKVENEER PILASTER CONSISTENT WITH RIVER ROCK VENEER WALL CONSISTENT WITH NICOLASVALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES Note:This graphic is an artist's interpretation of the applicaion of the Arbor Vista development standards and is not to be taken as the Final design or compulsory in nature.The final design shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variations In the placement,location,style,materials, and colors is expected as allowed in PD0-13.The exterior treatment of any structures,fences,or monuments may vary as allowed in P00-13. COMMUNITY MONUMENT DETAILS r'I Bale 01.111B„ a,OSANOPERTIBLVD.STE 200 ARBOR VISTA TEMECULA,CA 30SANGELES,CA90049 ®PLACEWORKS 10B Ak4-IOL LOS AN6-9800 ,n LEGEND sa 9 4'1104- �� STREET LIGHTING aiy" 1' 5' O„. Street lights are located on one side of the street,downward -- q y 1 r directed,and spaced 120'-170'apart,in accordance with `, r' ford `�`'°�� illumination standards of the CALGreen Code,Section o� ..' Y yr. d Y • A 'lni T-> O j - ' p iv, .• .• .' ,,. I Irr �.� \ 5.106.8.Solar powered lighting is encouraged., , • lit"\-\--oI1 , .;• max ° y / '" i 11�y xr� 0„_e. \ ' � k■e tit '''',4.-. , ' PC. ..1-'i ,, -4,‘ N,.. --.\---N... -"\ \ - -:, - -,. •,11 k' •s � ' - \--.1-1—:” ° i A111511. 1624 fillir/741 iftt ' 11#k***.-1-1* ' -)-''; '' w- • '‘.1- 4i, .Z----___:' i k 1; L 0 f itf=i rarcv .-. --:.' ....7:,(-41Art("Jo,. - ,.\\:\ , )‘ 0 . . , , . *-4 iaz AhtML -I OM lir ` k. 1• 0 r 11 Nal .Iv. . +fr E i A VI -.:*Aix „ fir• aA► i _ �, _ / l� wa• `° �=4� �� PA Pig�1�1���1�1�1�..�l�..�f���l,,�•� s A1 wits-141*'I�, ;,:�11w: � ti \{ 'lg.,. a A `` 11 :i `{,\ � l �. ��� � iii .1 r*�� �S�� too* i � i r� Esi"t� Q v 1 j API,. '.1. 4 4 s � frI `t_ /.g-1 �. �Rh.J' l -- Al frLwL-II is,A,-j' . - \3 4k.ti,...z,1/4'^ � � 6,10-!-- w 3j EXAMPLE OF RURAL STREET LIGHTING uc: - I ....... .,.-..ii__I__________,,._---,__,,,, .___, ___________. ___, --rte. CONCEPTUAL STREET LIGHTING PLAN REGENT PROPERTIES BATE DI 11990 PLACEWORKS ARBOR VISTA TEMECULA,CA L 311-Hi-L,,,, 90049 JOB Ak4-10L 31r-rff-7Uf • WALL,FENCE, AND MAILBOX LEGEND • • , SYMBOL DESCRIPTION h f rr 4'THREE RAIL FENCE(AlongVia Lobo Road) wf.,1 � - 6'SPLIT FACE BLOCK WALL(Common side yards) 4J`^ '�(G0�a o+'"% b - 4'THREE RAIL FENCE WITH STONE yc* - `',,Y Sw PILASTERS(Along Nicolas Road) _«>•+sue' f _ _ _ �\ ;:• 3'STONE WALL WITH CONCRETE CAP •" \ +�, (At Nicolas Road entry) •" \ , 6'VIEW FENCE(2'Block wall and 4'wrought Iron fence) . y 4--; - T ��►� 5'6''VINYL FENCE(Between private yard areas)ii '''' r ,°,-a �f ► ' ., - * MAILBOX LOCATION • °_' t' L. f ' ,rte , MAILBOX 1 , 3' u er.. '.., - +'"IK4 4..A-'IIP C. ;8;04\'`,4:,,),, • ,, � , ...I I,�'y�_ a- "^ � �i `Y tv _ ' '.1'y� '• ✓' Anil - 1,, , ,, ,„ i.,.... „,..,„,,,,,...0 .a /I' NICOLAS ROAD THEME FENCE �� +` ,,• j_3 WHITE VINYL 3 RAIL FENCE/RIVER ROCK VENEER PILASTERS CONSISTENT WITH a k P'� I h, , 7. y x ? . r NICOLAS VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES ''\•:,—) -.1.,":_, ' i_ii:_r- : ,- --4---6). .:460:: --' _-- .:____ :I- / _____. . _, ,,... ._ _ t -1- ' ----1- - I ) _r ;T� s rI I-LT _I I 4, _J ! v • --� COMMON SIDE YARD WALL WALL,FENCE,AND MAILBOX PLAN SANDSTONE COLORED SPLIT FACE BLOCK 4'GATE F Note:This graphic is an artist's ---n I 1 r Interpretation of the appllcaion • I -1 'H IHllillUflijiL ,. ^ - 0 ,+ ,, standards and M not so be taken � .'h "` tl -°rr 1-i-4 -t-f r- id KA 1 i -Y ,1 .,� as the final design or compulsory -" _ Lf 1 --••-- ' ' in nature.The final design shall be " '"`� v r `� f_I ��� r4 — reviewed using these graphics as f - -- — 'k t� ——` guidance;however,variations In the r- a placement.location.style,materials. - - — l- and colors is expected as allowed In PDO.13. COMMUNITYTHEME WALL PRIVATE YARD VIEW FENCE PRIVATE YARD INTERIOR FENCE RIVER ROCK VENEER CONSISTENT WITH NICOLAS SANDSTONE COLORED BLOCK WITH BLACK WROUGHT IRON WHITE VINYL VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES CONCEPTUAL WALL, FENCE, AND MAILBOX PLAN f µ1E 114.P.1014 119905AN PROPERTIES VICENT BLVD.S7E 200 LOS ANGELES,CA 90049 ®PLACEWORKS Ill IIN-10L 311-Oaf•!iN ARBOR VISTA I TEMECULA,CA • I � Min.back yard setback Min.back yard setback Min.back yard setback Min.back yard setback -° I I , / 20' 20' 20' 20' I n I 2 yC is i7 U c.� PLAN'3 1 PLAN 2 PLAN 4 ''2 9 PLAN '1 p m A T I F T T T Za IS 01 to E m N Y1 N N N ., N C_ _C C C r G C_ C_ 5' 5' 5' 5' 5'r ■5' 5' y}•-d Garage I I 1 Garage ' Garage I Garage } j f Garage I p Driveway 20 Driveway 20 Driveway PO Driveway —IV Min.side-entry 4— Min.front-entry 5 Utility Easement .5'Curb garage setback garage setback 4'Sidewalk R.O.W. STREET TYPICAL LOT SETBACK PLAN f 1 REGENT PROPE010E3 Kit pt„ , LOS 11990 AN E115.WENT 9 0VO.+fE7oD ®PLACEWORKS ARBOR VISTA TEMECULA,CA - Au w,-,,, LosarrGetES.CRSOwo ,,r-ua-sue CONCEPTUAL PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND IPDlallht111.lI,D G 1811101 Nt111U Iriki"AN 5Aacala PAM Facto( 4 ".I •A` I r STREET TREES I. h U^.en M . Camphor lrec minx One/L0: Medium • -- ., .t. t.\ Cupari d des Can Ot WOAd Medium • Pi ax , vc rVa RaYw J Sweet Ash Mr.•du a 11111111 tau us nr:n l:s e:Say (Medium Low I ` FRONT POILCH 1F,V + Laurs aapcn em ata udaen ea nbee Men um P nas Cate Pls and Pm Medium/Low }. Phcery y 1 r Date Palm Medium I�,�r ��'��,r^y�� } I Pyres y 'Lhanlcleer Chanllcl•erpear Medium 'll �•R N` Libras v fu a CI e• El rt• Med un '41.' / --- - 1� �'5 + J• II Was n,tcn a robust. Washington Fan Palm Men m ytl _ _ _ IIV.r SHRUBS •NOi 4501 •par■nyarng cote lot rlc Yards + r+ f ,/., 5 GALLON •i f;Jy (\ ACCENT TREES /]] Bash•a vat egala Purple Orchid Tree 24'Box 4$114.1!0 MWu UTILITY DRIVEWAY Milk: jf ,✓ 1aserstrn andca crape.Myrtle Medum EASEMENT 5. Prom,!.arc na•a Carolina Lauel Cherry hio-tun 'al� era p' i _ jAN05CA1E 4m.:14 r 9 A'lgrellt ll,�+W,4$^w ]IRlrc• t34iaon A*0.4.W MW un � - Rane Mex ran!she Palm Medium Z ; Burin r pt 1 PrdO PPP Medium Ca ISI I us Crlin,o B°Itlebm'h NtdlUm/LOW Cedrus tleodUre p°Udar Cedar Medium . SMALL TREE n,1'- Cercus un.Dens's Lastem Redbl d Mena n LARGE TREE 5 GALLON - Gellcra parvlc•a Australian W'Iow Medum/Low 15 GALLON w�q� . Llou,dambar slyraciflua Swc ergo, Modhom GROUND COVER - STREETTREE Melaleuea.1ypnee-alts Me!ale,:ra M•dd'm 24"BOX Platanusracemoa California Sycamore Medium R+,e 4501),1. CA,sliiue Oak Rhm,arnea Alncan Sumac AtWlium/Low TYPICALCORNER LOT Saimu,tneb„nn,linua Sal liar,Po000i lee Medium/Low VJasninglonla rrlera California Fan Palrrm Medium/Low AHa 1Bi Ahc:ia'Edwartl Gwcher Pink Atclia 5 gallon 2'0 C Medum Agapanllius aldcanus Lilly-of.lhe-N le lyal'on T0C Medium Ilac.haris salie,fOha Mulelat t,gallon 4')C' Medium(Low Ca'estemuo'Little John' No Common Name 5gallon 4'0 Medium/Low Ceanol bus'Lorvha' 0 oncl is Lea,:olnus Sgallon 4'0C Medium/Low Chamaeroes humilis Mediterranean 15 gallon 5'0C Fan Palm • • Mud NUwRawa.. Orchid Rockrose I gallon "0 C Medmm/low ' tatnr.-g,tre?UleotlSX. Coloneaasler 5 gakon 4'GC Medum Cup-elan w,npetwsee Ilauan Cypress 15 gallon NA Medium/Low INptli k llgfl Fortn ght Lily 1 gallon 2.0 C Medium Ithorre tAA1144A5 Pride of Madeira 5 gallon 4'0 C Meaium/Low // '•, �!Ilyw/t�], fylad wwaa ise Cal looraFU.n.a Sgallon 4'0C Low/Very Low SHRUBS ! I , �' ff -GROUND COVER r,.ntw ea'HAW wads klassdl Sgallnn 4 o c Mec um/Low I GALLON of L� I i h90B,erkt nflAOUlr• Toyon ej S galls n o C Medium/Low - '— I Heme II 4$b d pay!Ily 5 gallon n'0 C Med nit ii I Lavand t h Spanish Lavender 1 gallon 2'0 C Medium/Low J I�I ,• -.* Leptosp pa mum New Zealand Tea 1 ee 5 gad°t a'O C Medium/Low SHRUBS 11; r � Is =_ leymt cndensat s Cam W'M Rye Iga tan 2'OC A'ed am/Lcw 15 GALLREE I 5 GALLON IS GALLON ��� _ T-T i Les'mas t It c°Ides Creeping Wild Rye 1 gallon 2'0 C Netl'am Vv- r :::::::::.5 rg angen, I;ee•Grass lga ton 1'OC Metl am/Low nestca Heavny Bamdig. Sgallnn a'OC Low DRIVEWAY lcnra FurDe Needle ss !gallon 2p Low/Very LOW_ + 1 'San[a Cruz' Fretlie•n Sgallnn 4' Medum .� ms otfclrulls Ruemary Sgallnn 4' Medium/Lcw . � eiardll CleVelantl Sage Sgallnn 4' Low/Very LOw UTILITY anllu Mexican hlrnP e 5gallon 4' Ned um/LUw EASEMENT �r a,lya spalnaaea I lam,ngb m cage s gallon s' Medium/Luw My ma cdngt,lura 5galx DC Medlin p TURF 4_i � I® _— _' �► SMALLTREE . 5 GALLON TYPICAL INTERIOR LOT STREETTREE Note:Thisgrphic is an artist's interpretation of the a pp li aion of the ArborVista development standards 24"BOX •- and is not to be taken as the final design or compulsory in nature.The final design shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variations in the placement,location,style,materials,and colors is expected as allowed in PDO.13.The species,size,and number of plants shown shall comply with Section 17.32.090 of the Temecula Municipal Code,The exterior treatment of any structures,fences,or monuments may vary as allowed in PDO-13.. REGENT PROPERTIES �y j CONCEPTUAL FRONTYARD LANDSCAPE PLAN BAlE 01111014 11990 SAN VICENT BLVD.STE 200 PLACFW®RKS ARBOR VISTA I TEMECULA,CA LOS CA9f049 155 Pk6-101 310-B06-9800 O ANGELES, i mil, �I . , Il �H CONCEPTUAL PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND GROUND ! I, I {{ } COVER 1 } 1} \\I 11 pulnnYael Nc'I• Daman FM.flex SvxMe AMA 1' i. ta • f i ' 1 STREET TREES' c f I I ,1 SHRUBS nna mlihora camphor tree za'soon arse/tai Honour,. I�1L I I GALLON Cupan p ardloldes Carrot wood Medium LARGETREES ,} ` k 1 A`r 4 E Flaamus onycar pa'Raywood Ray wood Ash Medium r laeru T sweet Bay M eem /Low 15 GALLON \. ft l Koelre pamcurata laden Ranlree Medium Rnus cant ens s nary Island Pine Medium/Low /3 Moen a dactyl lera Dale Palm Medium `311 11 %e•-_ r • Pyrua y hamGeer Chanticleer Pear Medium _ f LARGE TREE VI nus p- f4 Chinese Elm McU um y s1- •$ 15 GALLON Washmatonta roeusta Washington Fan Palm Medium SHRUBS 5 GALLON ''r •+.,A` • I ^,f P'.,_ 'Mae 45-'0C spaong labor urn er lm same yards 1- �"' • r-- ACCENT TREES: e, �-�., _ 'Ii''''...., v. • Wuh' ava,egala Purple Orchid Tree N'Boa As indicated FhNaam• la-yersloT a lnno-a Crape Myrtle Me:tium• - - -: Prunus Cara mono Carolina Laurel Cherry Mall... • OANOSCAPE TREES •4 r- - r.~ &L¢M I..46:nraSa Silkuc: 15 GYkas Aarrd,.. d Medium t d y SMALL TREE Rmhea armata Mecca,Blue Palm Medium R A 5 GALLON ^ Bdra cav Lala p ndo Palm medium _ ' Lallslemen cltrinus Crimson Bo-tlebrush Medium/Low•t� �.'�..r Cetlrus deodora UtadarCedar Medium 4,1 r �' Q ; Cercus Camden raster,Redeud Medium Wem pary I oras Australian Widow Medium/Low o UQU!dambar slyraclllua SWeergum Mealum • 1 tom•—" ', . �j� I M!Ialeuca slMhelo.dex Melai,,,„ Menem Malavusra.emosa California Sycamore Medium k 1 121 01 s agn In la Coast live oak tow 1::\,„..,..i.1 • s I Rims lancca African Sumac Medium/Low ScMirus lerebnlhlau s tkazlar Pepper Tee Medium/Low Wash'ngtonla Biller,, Califonia an Palm Medium/Low TYPICAL PRIVATE SLOPE AREA r /1 °H/RS CONCEPTUAL PLANTING FORA 1,300 SF AREA WITH ,r Rx+arahuUroianas pink Al the 1 gallon 20C Medium iI SLOPES IN EXCESS OF B'IN HEIGHT /Aq' Agaparnhusahieanus Mulefate-Nik 1 gallon Y012 Medium Uacistemoa licdoha No Common 5 gallon 4'0 12 Medrum callisten,on tilde John' No Common Name 5gallon 4'0C Medium/Low Ccanolhus'Concha' Concha cnanothus 5 gate, 4'0 C Medium/Low Chamaerops humhls Mediterranean 15 gallon 6'0C Fan Palm C,scus purpureus Orchid Rcckrose Sgallon 2'0.C Medium/low 'J S/i •'f � f Cetone t horl Llis Cotoneaaster 5gallon 4'OC Medium 1 J {� Cupnes y s Italian Cypress 15 gallon NA Medur /Low {x �'-- Uletesg rill Fort ghlIlly Sgal cn i UC Medium / } l • Erbium nanum Pride of Madeira 5 gallon 4'OC Mecum/Low O 1 �I I7 F s �o" ' i i Ep lea um c California Fuchia S eal,en 4.00 Low/Very Low II ,,,,,-, ".,t Garryaellptica Coasts ktassol 5gallon a'0C Medium/Low SHRUBS I _ r — i�af/ Grenvlllea'Noelll' Grenv!Ilea Sgallon 4 00 Medium/Low 5 GALLON I' /r neteromelesarbutifaia Toyon 5 gallwr 4'Dc. Medium/Low [[[ ! Hemerorallis hybrid Vaylilly 5 gallon 2'DC Medium f ring, �- Lavandula stoechas Spanish Lavender 1gallon 2'0,C Medium l Low IIII ` Leptospermum s<dpanum New Zealand Tea Tree Sgallon 4'0.0 Mcdiunr/Low•ti - - �� SHRUBS LeYmus cpMensatus Grant wild Rye f galled 2'o c Medium/Low Leymus triticoldes Creeping Wild Rye 1 gallon 2'O C Medium . 5 GALLON Mamma domes Bens Ueer Grass l gallon 2'D C Medium/LOW 1iAl� Muhleaergianca H nyBambw Sgalon a'0.0 oW r �, J' Nassella pulcnra Purple Needle Grass 1 gallon 2'0 C Low/Very Low - ` - e Pyra.anfha'SantaCrui F h.rn 5gallon 4'0.0 Medium LARGETREE Rosntar nus ofllclnalls R nary 5 ga ion a•O.0 Medium/Low 15 GALLON yy�Iryrys +I{ SMALLTReB Salvia clev<ena l Cleveland Sage 5gallon 4'0 C Low/Very Low DRIVEVyAY I 5 GALLON Salvia leucentlu Me%lean oush Sage 5gallon Medium/Low • Salvia spalhurea Itummingb,rn Sage 5 gallon 5'DC LoW/Very Low 1 i �` SPdrobdus a rc,dea Alkalai sxalon 1 gallon 5'D.C. Medium um/Law _ %Ylusrna crangeilum Shmy aylpsnta Sgallon 5'pc Median 1�; - .fI GROUND COVER I Pr. /1 , UTILITY ............./..- .� 1 C ,l�, EASEMENT j ' — • � I "mil STREET TREE 24"BOX Note:This graphic is an artist's Interpretation of the applicaion of the ArborVistaa development standards ��Y - and Is not to be taken as the final design or compulsory in nature.The final design shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance:however,variations in the placement,location,style,materials,and colors is expected as allowed in PDO-13.The species,size,and number of plants shown shall comply with TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC LOT Section 17.32,090 of the Temecula Municipal Code,The exterior treatment of any structures,fences,or monuments may vary as allowed in PDO-13. CONCEPTUAL FRONTYARD AND PRIVATE SLOPE LANDSCAPE PLAN REGENT PROPERTIES BATE allzgu 11 SANGEES,CA 0049.5TE700 PLACEWORKS ARBOR VISTA'TEMECULA,CA I05 aSrrlQL 3110 8069800 901W9 PC RESOLUTION GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0131, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE (OS)" ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on May 21 , 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: General Plan Amendment Application No. PA12-0131 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area; The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because it has been designed as a conservation/cluster development to provide a transition between high and low density development within the rural Nicolas Valley. The proposed development will preserve approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site, and provide additional trails and preserve habitat. In addition, the General Plan Amendment is accompanied by a Home Product Review Application that has been reviewed and conditioned to provide homes of a high quality design via appropriate massing, roofline variation, high quality and varied materials, and floor plan square footage consistent with existing development in the surrounding area. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the General Plan Amendment Application, PA12-0131: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the General Plan Amendment and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on April 21, 2014, and expired on May 20, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA12-0131 , a General Plan Amendment to change the land use plan map from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential and Open Space (OS) (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020). Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of May, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0131, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO); PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21 , 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30-day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14- adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area; The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because it has been designed as a conservation/cluster development to provide a transition between high and low density development within the rural Nicolas Valley. The proposed development will preserve approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site, and provide additional trails and preserve habitat. In addition, the General Plan Amendment is accompanied by a Home Product Review Application that has been reviewed and conditioned to provide homes of a high quality design via appropriate massing, roofline variation, high quality and varied materials, and floor plan square footage consistent with existing development in the surrounding area. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the existing General Plan on file with the City of Temecula City Clerk's office. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Gwyn R. Flores, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 14- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2014, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2014, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk I I i I I1 ARBOR VISTA LOT AREAS EXISTMG EASEMENTS.y , TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 36479 _ r .4ss. ,. • �� CITY OF TEMECULA, CA RNMPIVI 1 Waragal may.. NOTES ..,-g--.. alisr 111 RI 11 ,. _y • • T 11 j61 .x _ RESIDENTIAL GROSS J V y WM IJ NET 8 AVERAGE AREAS PROPOSED EASEMENTS -.. i ,�.. . . IL I \' LOT SIZE REOUIREMENTS� 1 — 'ioerumoiiiin -r — � i LOT SUMMARY I .--A: _ \L;':::, .:;:,.Ye y '. - i---1- 1 vJ 1 ; =Vs fx _� l . \ -t141 t LEGAL DESCRIPTION.r �,` ' y o \\\ STATEMENT OF GS �,r °� _ .,,... .. .., t1"- �_ /1 �_ .,— 'I ` CCU a ] I, ....... TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS v .,.-— Lr" I NW..NOM ,ems v••■■•.•-—_•-- 1s I —� r' --� ` '7 .—.'..—•� PREPARED FOR: PREPARED BY: ♦A...mm. MT CIF en7M* APPLICANT. —f`07 11:0131##PROREMS mm T — �`_ �. a - \..• 1i,-'' _ _ — ...-_ —�. — TENTATIVE TRACT li �„ _.�� "°s __-- w.;. ,,_,,..1„ MAP NO. 36479 R i�. r3 1 - 1.out i)e*%.4 Palidty :wi os • o . .■ Silo PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0132, AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD" (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on May 21 , 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zoning Map and Text Change Application No. PA12-0131 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and General Plan Amendment from VL-Very Low Density to L-Low Density Residential. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan; The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Zone Change Application, PA12-0132: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Zone Change and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on April 21, 2014, and expired on May 20, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA12-0132, a Zone Change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential and Open Space (OS) via a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) with provisions for clustering (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020). Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of May, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary ORDINANCE NO. 14- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0132, AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (OS) (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21 , 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30-day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14- adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and General Plan Amendment from VL-Very Low Density to L-Low Density Residential. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan; The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. The City Council hereby amends the Development Code, Section 17.22 — Planned Development Overlay (PDO) Zoning District on file with the City of Temecula City Clerk's office. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of , 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Gwyn R. Flores, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 14- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2014, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2014, the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk Arbor Vista Planned Development Overlay 17.22.254 Title. Sections 17.22.254 through 17.22.266 shall be known as "PDO-13" (Arbor Vista planned development overlay district). 17.22.256 Purpose. The Arbor Vista planned development overlay district(PDO-13)provides regulations that guide the development of a rural,residential community, which is clustered to maximize open space and preserve drainage ways. It is the intent of the city to use these special regulations to supplement the development standards of the adopted development code. 17.22.258 Relationship with the development code and citywide design guidelines. A. Except as modified by the provisions of PDO-13, the following rules and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area: 1. The citywide design guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 2. The approval requirements contained in the development code that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 3. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. B. Development within PDO-13 shall comply with and complement the rural character of the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines, as is demonstrated through the architectural styles, theme walls, materials of fencing, entry monuments, and landscaping shown in Exhibits A through L. 17.22.260 Use regulations. The Arbor Vista planned development overlay district(PDO-13) is intended to provide for the development of a master-planned residential community. The permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses within Arbor Vista are residential in nature and shall be governed by Section 17.06.030 of the Municipal Code. 17.22.262 Development Standards. All development within PDO-13 shall also comply with the following development standards: Residential Development Standards I PDO-13 Lot Min. buildable lot area 5,500 square feet Max. units per gross acre 1.13 DU/Ac Max. units per net acre 1.27 DU/Ac Min. width at required front setback area 55' Min. lot frontage at front property line 55' FEB 0 4 ZU14 Min. lot frontage for a flag lot at the front 25' property line _ Min. lot depth 80' Setbacks—habitable area Min. front setback (habitable area) 10' Min. corner exterior side yard 10' Min. interior side yard 5' Min. rear yard 20' Min. front yard (unenclosed porch/stoop) 1 10' Garages Min. front setback(front entry garage) 20' Min. front setback(side entry garage) 10' Driveway Min width(residential, 2 units or less) 12' Height Maximum height(to ridge) 35' Max. projection above height limits (e.g. 15' for flues, chimneys, elevators, or other mechanical equipment, television antennas, spires or bell towers, or similar architectural,utility, or mechanical features) Other Detached accessory structures Per 17.06.050D Encroachments into setbacks Per Table 17.06.050B Walls/fences Per 17.06.050J Swimming Pools Per 17.06.050E Site Visibility Per 17.06.050K Secondary Dwelling Units Per 17.06.050L Property Maintenance Per 17.06.050M 17.22.264 Setting A. Setting and Location. Arbor Vista is comprised of 73.3 acres located on the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo Road in Nicolas Valley. Nicolas Valley is located in the northeast corner of the City and is of a rural residential character with large lots and open space surrounding Santa Gertrudis Creek. The natural topography of the area consists of gently rolling hills. B. Surrounding Uses and Development. The northern edge of Arbor Vista is directly adjacent to Nicolas Road. The northern side of Nicolas Road is adjacent to Nakayama Park which includes an off-street regional bike trail, a full court basketball facility,picnic and turf areas and a concrete-sided drainage channel. A residential subdivision designated as Low Medium Density Residential is located beyond. The western boundary of Arbor Vista is adjacent to Via Lobo Road. A residential subdivision designated as Low Medium Density Residential is adjacent to the western side of Via Lobo Road. The eastern edge abuts property designated and developed as Very Low Density Residential and the southern edge abuts open space and the Santa Gertrudis Creek. 17.22.266 Development Concept This section describes the conceptual development components of Arbor Vista. Except for the street sections (Exhibits B, C, and D), the images are an artist's interpretation of the application of the Arbor Vista development standards and design parameters and are not to be taken as the final design or compulsory. The final design shall be reviewed using these conceptual images as guidance; however, variations in the placement and location of buildings, street alignments, amenities, style,materials, colors, and landscaping placement/type is expected as allowed in PDO-13. A. Land Plan. The Arbor Vista planned development overlay district(PDO-13)provides for the development of eighty-three single family detached homes on fee-owned lots on 73.3 acres. As shown on the Site Plan (Exhibit A), development is clustered to maximize open space and preserve the Santa Gertrudis Creek. The site grading has been designed to preserve the crest of the on-site ridge(elevation 1235), and lots adjacent to the ridge are nestled along the downward slope. All cul-de-sac streets terminate in open space, creating an open, rural character within the site. Approximately 43.3 acres are devoted to private open spaces, and additionally 6.4 acres are devoted to a public park, and 1.4 acres are devoted to water quality/detention basins. The residential lots, which comprise 16.0 acres, and streets, which comprise 6.2 acres (4.2 acres private and 2.0 acres public), account for 30% of the total site. These acres may change slightly during final tract map review if found to be in substantial conformance with these concepts. Exhibit B, Conceptual Imagery includes photos of communities having elements similar to Arbor Vista but do not represent literal imagery of the proposed community. B. Access and Circulation. . The circulation plan for Arbor Vista reflects and enhances the rural character of the existing community. Along the northern boundary of the site, the Nicholas Road right-of-way will be extended to 110', including a 7' landscaped parkway and 5' sidewalk which will encourage pedestrian circulation and allow space for thematic fencing. Two entries to Arbor Vista will be provided through a connection to and an extension of Via Lobo Road, which will be improved to include a 77' right-of way(42' curb to curb). Both locations will potentially include private gated entries. The public portion of the Via Lobo Road terminates in a bulb which includes a circular planting area, then transitions into "A" Street, a private neighborhood street. The other entry to Arbor Vista is "C" Street, a private road having a 65' maximum right-of-way and 41' maximum width curb to curb at the connection with Via Lobo Road. Interior circulation to homes shall be provided on private streets having a 37'—41' right-of-way and 32' curb to curb width with parking on one side as shown on Exhibit E, Interior Street Sections. Final road alignments may vary slightly from those depicted on Exhibit A, as determined in the final tract map if found to be in substantial conformance with these concepts. C. Parks. Open space is incorporated throughout Arbor Vista and active and passive recreation will be offered to both residents and the public. Nicolas Road Park, a 6.4 acre active recreation will feature an interactive water play facility and shade structures, complementing the City of Temecula's existing public parks by offering a fun, safe, cooling summer play area not currently available in the vicinity. Turf and picnic areas are also included and the park will be accessed by the public via Nicolas Road, where ten public parking spaces will be included. Residents of Arbor Vista will access the park by a private trail connecting from C Street along the eastern boundary. Exhibits F, G, and H are an artist's interpretation of the park amenities and are not to be interpreted as final. The final design will be approved during final tract map stage and the amenities shall be approved by the parks director. In addition to the public park, open space totaling 43.3 acres is planned within Arbor Vista, comprising of 59% of the total site area including the Santa Gertrudis Creek jurisdictional area. A regional trail extending from east to west through the site north of the creek provides public access to the open space. The high percentage of open space within the community will provide an ample buffer from adjacent neighborhoods and a feeling of spaciousness. D. Monuments and Fences. Serving as a major unifying element, the theme walls, fencing, and monuments of Arbor Vista will reflect the rural, agricultural design theme of the surrounding area and will be in accordance with the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines. A positive first impression of the community will be generated by the inclusion of a white rail fence with river rock stone pilasters along the northern boundary parallel to Nicolas Road. The design of this fence will harmonize with the existing fence on the north side of Nicolas Road, extending the previously established Nicolas Valley design theme. Design of the entry monuments will be understated in nature and reflect the high degree of design integrity found throughout the community. As shown on Exhibit J, a Nicolas Valley entry monument will be included at the corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo Parkway. In addition, entry monuments announcing arrival into Arbor Vista will be located at both entries from Via Lobo Road, and a 3' high river rock theme wall will extend along the eastern side of Via Lobo Road north of the "C" Street entry. Exhibits I and K depict the locations and styles of the other walls and fences in Arbor Vista. View fencing consisting of a 2' block wall and 4' black wrought iron will be located at the rear of lots having views. Exposed side yards will incorporate 6' high sandstone colored split face block walls, and interior separations between lots will consist of 5'6"white vinyl fencing. These features, while conceptual in nature, comply with the theme established by the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines. E. Trails and sidewalks. An extensive pedestrian circulation system provides convenient access to all community elements,potentially helping to promote health and wellness of residents. Along the northern boundary of the site, the Nicolas Road right-of-way includes a 5' wide sidewalk. An adjacent 5' wide decomposed granite trail outside the right-of way provides a total trail width of 10' as shown on Exhibit C,Nicolas Road Street Section. This trail provides the public convenient pedestrian and bicycle access to Nicolas Road Park. Via Lobo Road includes a 6' sidewalk along the west side and a 6' wide paved regional trail along the east side as shown on Exhibit D, Via Lobo Road Section. Near the end of the public portion of the street, the regional trail crosses Via Lobo Road as shown on Exhibit A. The trail then transitions to an 8' decomposed granite walkway which parallels Santa Gertrudis Creek south of"A" Street, and connects to an existing trail at the eastern boundary of the site. An additional 6' decomposed granite trail connects the terminus of"C" Street to Nicolas Road Park, providing private access to residents. Every home within Arbor Vista will enjoy pedestrian connection to the regional trail network from 4' curb adjacent sidewalks included on both sides of all private neighborhood streets as shown on Exhibit E,Interior Street Section. F. Landscaping. The landscape design of Arbor Vista will reflect the rural, agricultural theme of the community and the plant palette will consist of native plants and other climate appropriate materials. Water conservation, disease resistant, low maintenance materials will be given priority as will plants that offer seasonal variation. The landscape plan will comply with Chapter 17.32 of the Municipal Code and the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines. The Plant Material List, shown in Exhibit M, describes the menu of acceptable plant types, sizes, spacing, and water use in Arbor Vista. Exhibits 0, P, and Q depict the typical landscape treatment for front and exterior side yard, cul-de-sac, and private slope conditions. These landscape treatments are based on the minimum setbacks provided herein. The types of plants shown in each Exhibit are conceptual and the locations and types of plants and will be determined during the final landscape plan. The final planting plan may vary within the Arbor Vista Landscape Plant Palette. Exhibit L includes preliminary locations and images of typical rural street lighting treatments (variations are permitted). Low pressure sodium or LED, downward directed lights will be located on one side of the street, spaced 120' — 170'apart, and will meet all applicable illumination standards. Solar powered lighting is encouraged. G. Architecture.High quality neighborhood design is a priority at Arbor Vista, and creating interesting and aesthetically pleasing streetscapes is a central goal of the community design. The level of detail and quality of architectural treatments for the homes will be significantly higher than that of the surrounding community. A high degree of variation in building massing at Arbor Vista has been provided to avoid the monotonous "canyon effect" of flat, two-story homes along residential streets. One-story home plans comprise 25% of the floor plans and 50% are two-story homes with one-story elements along the street. To minimize the impact of garages, 25% of plans feature a"living"portion of the home forward, with the garage a minimum of 6' behind the front plane of the living space. The inclusion of front porches and second story balconies also add interest to the streetscapes of Arbor Vista. Exhibit T includes minimum lot setback standards and includes footprints of the four Arbor Vista floor plans. Variation in massing is also achieved through inclusion of variations in roof pitch from 4:12 to 6:12. Each of the four floor plans at Arbor Vista has been executed in three architectural styles, creating twelve distinctly different home designs,bringing a high degree of interest to every street. Colors and materials, including brick, stucco,horizontal lap siding, stacked stone, and carriage type garage doors have been carefully chosen to authentically express the essential elements of each style. All architectural features thoughtfully reflect a high level of quality and attention to detail, including arched entryways with ceramic tile accents, entry towers, sculpted pot shelves, and three types of entry carriage lights, ensuring that each home is distinctly different from others surrounding it. Another important design consideration well executed at Arbor Vista is attention to all four elevations of a home rather than only the front. Enhanced rear and side elevations bring the same degree of quality shown in the front to the entire home, as shown in Exhibit S,Architectural Elevations. Examples include second floor projections with siding on rear elevations, wrought iron detailing on rear covered patios matching front detailing, and shutters on rear windows. The three architectural styles chosen for Arbor Vista include Spanish, Traditional, and Craftsman (see Exhibit R,Architectural Styles) and are intended to complement the rural character of the area. This list of styles has been formed to provide architectural character fitting for the context of the site, and variety to the street scene but is not to be considered exclusive. Variations can be approved through the development review process. Four diverse plan types are proposed, creating a rich architectural palette which will result in neighborhoods with articulation, variation and visual interest. H. Drainage, Grading, and Utilities. The proposed grading and drainage plan for Arbor Vista reflects a great sensitivity to the natural characteristics and features of the site. On-site drainage and off-site drainage from Via Lobo will be diverted into two desiltation basins on the western side of the property. The conceptual grading and drainage plan as well as proposed utility locations are depicted on the accompanying Tentative Tract Map#36479. The final grading plan and locations and sizes of the infrastructure shall be determined during the final grading plan and tract map. Exhibit A: Site Plan 3 9 3 9 9 A AA ee yy��Egge;pE;$e @$e pe yEy kgg5q §§EeE ,3g1, @_=5e a Da Z I w s ? w i a J Z Q c (f 3. 3 f[u 1 Q i` YRK ,gA5 .t_,Ma z i Ur , ,,.,` -,M5& e 611..3 ,358x4, 3,9im F. E_ Z Z ' . E' ° ////21j) l e ;3, l [ aE Y f • • • f J r , . is rL , fl r' 1 ) I z { / ' t I 1 ,6 /;� o w e;) ) / I 1 a a 1 Wa o U ' '---- Ig•-). ,, , ' — — — , r 9 a z -� �. g th 11,11 5 ` j j a) G �c ti \ s a+ '' �.. O N 'b Kl '17 54114 n ■ f/t f L< ` '4'11 ° CM:' ' l I+. t. A 4' y ° a arL, "CI o G 17d. li 30 14 1 l 731 F 1� j, 1 C N U � � U N r AiL\'\' ,! 0 i_.4.1'7•„,,, i gr.... .� iftt.. ¢:. Fie t R 1 f U b N -1, are, F'• r i' � � �� ' _"- y 0 0 ty U y ion .. fliI • D x . m F 1 l07 Y o> HI K [C g •0 VI Eoz i �° � E �g i A m 3 ° U W co ZZ° �~,r ,N� z w G�� , 7Z z> ° .. q o ° o o o�+ F 1-U Z E z> Z 0 J> Z>z Z E�z 0j m Z E '' F N -i4E w3Z v� o° E w1a^ ° w E °3w nni z . w �, �U id Zfu° -'F� Z NZOw �Fwmo dog NZO Sm ° Z a> p°w >w� o >wuZ 0 Eoz wV o 0 �N19 Eo V o 3Q 8U 'b c- L.No gOZ J Z mZH� w OZOwZ _,„ o 6Z6 0_, Z >Z N o Wb o one c V oa Ci 220-5 ¢ 0wZ¢ 3~w ~~ ..z °l j E g'o Z U> o <E317 U' zn oe5E ° 6 QUO ccF o m Exhibit B: Conceptual Imagery .040.000...„ „ ., • ilif' ,, ,,,,,,,. - . - ,. }, - , ,µ}ft\ 1.111111111 � a w , ' 1 '101111'1" 11 1 1 _4 514° , Y kiyP .4 ��'� �t �s41i . ,, licl K rr P Imagery of agricultural themed fencing ■ i e•�f1 0'r .fir{/ 4 .. it �-� a t" Imagery of naturalistic trail Exhibit B depicts conceptual imagery of Arbor Vista and is not to be taken as the final design or compulsory in nature. The final design shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variations in the placement and location of buildings,style,materials,colors and landscaping is expected as allowed in PDO-13. Exhibit C: Nicolas Road Street Section 0 W H Y O a ID 4 cc Z a ' D W A 0, \ Ti \ \ N in F CO \ C i.i r' I v >. > >+ TO r 1 od o v, 3; m (d .d CC o cd v ■ U :,...' p � VD U 4 cl N 0 M W J d a cil Wa Q o o ci -+ p IRJO .7 i 0 Z ^ cn i 0 CL ■ tea, ° m 3 - 4 O • O O. yb 'in ili 411 (5 {#J m CC a 3 O 0 g Z iii 0 ° w b J 0 �• o \ \ \ o °'El f Z � � 1 \ j'i .5 cd to i 10 CC \ \ \ \ -d o a) C U 4° o Z NI a a o U A W b N Exhibit D: Via Lobo Road Street Section W iv / �i / N !V / - Rr-a 9.S. t rlii� N l a0 w ti o 1 X) cII• d 4 b �J >0. .LH 0 a`' I b� m a�Q Z i,--i. b O-,-m , W 0 C N w m ao cal aii R aai II v o te W I N o NI b A O O U b • td: 1 m ea N O• cd U W "d " i4 -o ° � II) Q U +r O N He J b M 2 ' W o W Exhibit E: Typical Interior Street Section W i N dg a 1 W W CC :r \ H EA . - LL or . LL zo ill �wr � 7 a a 1 I W . .a, V Q1 d 1N 4. sr WM YrI o U Cam... _._ - 1.), CC vs i F r 0 1- w W �+ . m 0-IX irt 1, Us S W U w 7, U iu 114 m x .: al (4) 2 i . c 6 z ,, U 'C3 to -E . .... 'd D W a .O R} 'C1 W g Exhibit F: Illustrative Park Concepts u a� F Lz U. Lai. t7-,o 2,,c? m a V • ' Oi A_m Qm � z am , ''F� m ao OR }� i- D 1 ` 4 I i ,sy n 1�t Arti>gF. o I `,\,, \ \\\\ ,s, r r .: t � II z IM' � y x I- 1 d t " 1? I [ S g f . n t a i r .45,, 'msµ\\\ l.11k#0.,^A.t. < ,, 1,, — 1 — co ra N. c- 19 's� . . , ! t w H t i �u e .0 r A'�- z A > i)4.6 ° .0•m h c 3 k '1'47...41N,, a fix, "_ A .• '~ 1Y, P. Q A ,Awl Z 5 ,. , 0 A .ft i 1 4 kin ,000 5,...„..,„ti,_ . ,,,,, ,„- ..„ .1, - % •. .„...,.. __ .6„fit. P. , u. vi :., .... , 11.4, .. • w `` 1 (I.) ra 51 ,."'..-Q slip Z 0 ,4 01. ccd e7 .141 - 0.r:,,,,,,..,-... .... .1. j 4 7 11� 'tis f t l �lY 1 3 1�1, a o' 0 „lap a0i m • S - ►1V .., fir. w p s�. ACT W Y L. _ , Y t• Cd R. N ce W Y — <ac V I 4 fe i •A .r 1+-1 E O cfa w w U ce W H p� 5/ _ cd Oy.Ww J po 0 7 Z ll r --.�: fi,�Sll w cy by H O S3 �� Z ug 2 w H Z 0wW 9- =o° g o o w E H cd ° v a Exhibit G: Dimen sioned Park Plan R q ///////:i1/1:7 6:72:' CC < 1 £ 0 7 ' § 5* ` -J (..0 j - 2 0 \ I ( / 5 \ = o S 0 Z - . § 7 S / 5 - 49'� 0 . •\ \ U_ I- , © d o . § \ \ / •_ re 14 U I-2 %\ 0 ii» . h k 0 \ \ . § 4a I a 2 ›, :� {\ . f _ iii 1. . f 774 • 2 11 ! : � w § / \ .- 4 o a %G @ a) © m ; • H § a \ k % 5 5 § X 0 •- .§ Exhibit H: Playground Vignette l IJ4■ 4 ;a . : 0* Lad: ''' . vijk4.4&,_ Z Lu Z z - z 1 0 , 0 . ' r-' '' .; 0 ,..,„ lifii.„ a CC �► /. La cc La < ill N r- n a J a 1 a. a � "1 i r > t T a a a J a iii .c. F>ul • N 1 I w Rz W ` FNI_ Z F cc W J • y�1. r.N� ' � H —1 0 U � 0 Z 1 .. r v z U N j oD C 7 F { + �� w LLg V) (9 N ¢ aCe LU !F ` = j ' oZ � � o o z H CC 11 I •. ,a 1 it'T A . _ .y 3 r 91 I ,.t 0 1 ,., _, V , jir / 11 J ` " ,,,,,‘, . .,,,,:..... . . iffiks, 1 .„„, _. pi E i .. 1 v ,.. r ..N E. s-/ •r rte , 0)4. \ a . , . ,k,, ....dr till,. i ,e 174,-. , /410i . .10 1 < E a .gyp �� w�r,F. .1 id • �+ ,y�I'i A. s 113 r :.e, 1---Air � • LI Iq� V ��t ct. SF+ f l �� 11_• .� • ti,{ /r 1 g vl R. in ilea • -- -C.5' - + # ! Q {19� n a'.ti".c ti• 111\1\ il' �' ' "�k mow,• P E,,,:.,,,,. .,... ....,,,, i �1 ;..ww• ',� a• E. -� n ,0 � ,• Exhibit I: Wall and Fence Plan lir 0 1 //ft)r v ILLI 1 I a ; �-r / ;/ r? Z W Q �q I /\'iy / MO , U 1~/1— u N .a -5 /f 1 r W C / 4i7.-7 ✓ffl!! I�1 { E z 6 z V t r ' /' }sSy/ / )/ f > J/ 7f ! ! _ LL I W i �•LL }_ X ' i ii, Z& 1 1 r +I 1 . I it Z c : 1 / / ' _1 E * ....,0,,, .. _______ ______ t (?), -., .\\:_,,,,„ - .... a .>„- .. ,_.,,,),..1..7).:__ ____11__,..:__ i, \ ., 1 S , hL � pry " c ,.••t• -L �' -ter ; �5 f : - f f J , .. ,, -yam 2 ti �.': r 1 �!�\ 'Y f I r - . .,./. t. � +, r l v r. 6"1//e jir j c, OP*' : I r 1 �„ g , :fir t+ .estate \ :„. ,; :. ' '\I)))\ )(-. ,-. ...'„: .; \vvv,(1r-i 1p.14„iihm Nip/ .0;11,11,-ter0 t 0 4:. ..*7 y I�1f.:.�+ X72 +t y_i y�`* ,f 1 4 Y 1 ,t� � Atrr ice:..~ .. 'Mi w�.. 1�1S.I \ ( \\ i. '11,1 sl- "*.'c\'7-- .IN til'i-..-;.. iiiiiii)t-r*,:.1,4 ..w_z, .. ..1 i',, j : _t).______\,_c_.'.:N.. '11 '. 1+, r -7( - --- -. - - it - — - T______ . , ., -)....,c,'.i.,„,-7-y-,-SI. ---E,,,-.:).- .:,.;i:_.;,,,i,. ,..ij _ ,---- - -- - \\\ \ -,\ , . _... 41_,'. ::.......73._ .1,,r•- ' '-ei.,dr,". i ___:: _ ,i;:, _________ _ _ ., ; - . ' - ---- F-77—,7 - / ,---- - \ \L_ -, ,,,,,,,g-----;,-. ' ---- ., "it; \\ . --7---\\:: cl‘ _., :_, ,.-,„4 -N" , - ., -./.•\,,,s. �K -' :_ \\\\,, . .', , , .. '. . ',„ . . eizo,,....). \__-__--___-_--„--\-7,.-_,\‘\ di. ,,,, ,,t. 1,11 \ t _ m \►3 _ vii-1 \ \ =;BOA �: li r Exhibit J: Entry Monument Illustrations " ^� vs �" 's \ ' / -"I'...et.*ft li it--•- 4 id'A- 1 / Y j.i`rj +i. n §ak*at ,I+ f r f1 't fty�s "q, l w• !� y a . ,j � ��1 le yu�dj ,+, a I z•,...\j('1.1, '+.7 ? t� 6Z7i ' `, ►_ +y _y.11i� ` Y �rY lF � O ' r �4 -- iTi ¢ fir'_ ,-+.7 t w 11 } i G' rf di 1 ,,/� �., O -‘. co 4 w s t ' mi. Q .a -y I • U 0 , •,_ ,L, ,if N L a 3 o b a) w �" .p g z W o Z o y—w? > Z o k �ai r Z '> bd ' • ,-, 4 )• o y b 7d u Z r��; •2 w g z R., w l 771 5 I �6,/ ¢ z ~ w • y u O v-,i w x 2 c to fl = ulN ' ' :_,grifillifilli O Q O o co¢ Q O Z Mz G bil o F" ccci m o 0 O 0 • Q•, Exhibit K: Wall and Fence Plan Illustrations .r j / 9 / r --,i. z w ,.. tn 1 x 4e z 0 V N w w gL▪Lw 19 111 1:7 CI il. :171. 9 } I 1 ,e U J J Q V w a LL � H �W ° W ZZ �= wl7 I iT o o a Y p ` t ! O 0 o J 4 Z 4,1. ".'it' ..41 , cc„, L> 5 1�. Qua 1'� OZ ,� i Duo t 1 VN -.L Z � z ,•' �._. _ _,., . ,. -1 :7: r .. , z w 1- x / A ..9-5 1 1 w 6 V ..9.f J J1h w, W Nw 6 LL cc O J e + 2 I Ww �1 ''+ r i F - 2 vi Z C � F- z 0 — I p v, 3 ! 1- V w CC cc 0 a +! = >- a 4 > w + C LU ., s > ill +r a) -0 'C N dd Z N 4+ N o cc Ill 7 13 1 W U (All, —. — i!—_ 0 3 m H N'HUILI- m w f= iimmmin cc Q _..1111. W !lel ii .fft[ U f � OWC V �! .2 r oc L) :41; a b dw � ,� -. ., 11111111.1. I- � -tiaz10 Z Exhibit L: Lighting Plan 0 z I- I 0 J t ID . L oLL o bo O V N C 7 J 5 c Si O 0_ `E' c`, J .., 01 Q N C b U (p 0 _N- . ., (9 O 4 n0 Z 7, NO O U � � N U � 7_ O) I O u .8 3 • w 2.b a • N 1- - N O O W .°_o-6 '� O w 76 N . • � v E '''3. � � Y Ja / .w.„.. �`n /%"1■■•,- 41 it_ 1" 401,... i law ) re -441:41■ -, t--3\ (;"ts, IttO -7\ 41-f 4i . ,.....4,,,, ,,t,,,,t,Iii,_, . .,...: 4 1 i i ct 0.,V.-- ii."k ,;--.it 40-lift. ), iii I ( ,/ - -j" y .�;s, Ill's 1 lid grzAh- vin.L \\ ---)//„4,.- .- ','' rt•P:.:',It ) Ilw melt 70. 4, kier-Jim. ik.ki ( <t7' .7.'.- 'r -.4-, lax' 'AU I • -..' °AIN. , * 1 / _ ,. 1.T r4, 0 IMAI ! ;PI 13, , ..N. ____J am •.,..i. ,. -' 41, ril wiz, tioAKr 01.1 /2 \ ; .,.(;‘;`"'sj .---," 'L- firiffii i.,4•1::'4 '`. ffi!---Pviir '-'--"---t 4iii,w . \- . '-', 1 tv ,L.L!Illt '4414.''''... Ill:kV it'A i Li5=0 ts 17.11. ,1 it O.! , .i .,::.,I "6, . 10 jr (....,.• AI, I,, , IC1 ,f-r' 4 1 `1%i J r ., M..wW: Ij1fi lms" i r 1. r,i !' + / i ; '�$ `fly i _ I i ' - ° '"-" -.Orr # I�l.I& Q�:■ . 3;11{11♦.�. .'i. �.•.kift„Ai .)‘_, '0,..".1:;:il ''''%\---., ".,, ,k:1„.4.211illinialiwrliii alinficoilli: „:114,70.1 3i-li" 'Et., ..!,'411r_____it „.",,i1). _____ \\ 1 ��+ • •' -,.`� -ice'; (7} .rR �• jE3#...i '' .6. Qn 7n• arl r�I * .,:±[ � ,. / 1 . ,, ,....... . 14. 0.:,...--__________. „ .61-clici4 i \ __ --.. ',,-t:-----c-. ,------c,,--------..r".\C.--( ii\ Exhibit M: Plant Palette Botanical Name Common Name Min. Size Spacing Plant Factor STREET TREES: Cinnamomun camphora Camphor Tree 24" Box One/Lot Medium Cupaniopsis anacardioides Carrot wood Medium Fraxinus oxycarpa `Raywoodi' Raywood Ash Medium Laurus nobilis Sweet Bay Medium/ Low Koelreutia paniculata Golden Raintree Medium Pinus canariensis Canary Island Pine Medium/ Low Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Medium Pyrus calleryana `Chanticleer' Chanticleer Pear Medium Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm Medium Washingtonia robusta Washington Fan Palm Medium *Note: 45' O.C. spacing along corner lot side yards ACCENT TREES: Bauhinia variegata Purple Orchid Tree 24" Box As Indicated Medium Butia capitata Pindo Palm Medium Lagerstomia indica Crape Myrtle Medium Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Medium Prunus Caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry Medium Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm Medium/Low Washingtonia robusta Mexican Fan Palm Medium LANDSCAPE TREES: Albezia julibbrissin Silktree 15 Gallon As Indicated Medium Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm Medium Butia capitata Pindo Palm Medium Callistemon citrinus Crimson Bottlebrush Medium/ Low Cedrus deodora Deodar Cedar Medium Cercus Canadensis Eastern Redbud Medium Geijera parviflora Australian Willow Medium/ Low Liquidambar styraciflua Sweetgum Medium Melaleuca styphelioides Melaleuca Medium Platanus racemosa California Sycamore Medium Quercus agrifolia Coast Live oak Low Rhus lancea African Sumac Medium/ Low Schinus terebinthifolius Brazilian Pepper Tree Medium/ Low SHRUBS: Abelia 'Edward Goucher' Pink Abelia 5 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Agapanthus africanus Lilly-of-the-Nile 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Baccharis salicifolia Mulefat 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Callistemon 'Little John' No Common Name 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Ceanothus'Concha' Concha ceanothus 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Chamaerops humilis Mediterranean 15 gallon 6' O.C. Fan Palm Cistus purpureus Orchid Rockrose 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/ Low Cotoneaster horizontalis Cotoneaaster 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium Cupressus sempervirens Italian Cypress 15 gallon N.A. Medium/Low Dietes grandiflora Fortnight Lily 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Echium candicans Pride of Madeira 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Epilobium canum California Fuchia 5 gallon 4' OC Low/Very Low Exhibit M: Plant Palette (cont.) Botanical Name Common Name Min. Size Spacing Plant Factor Garrya elliptica Coast Silktassel 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Grenvillea 'Noelli' Grenvillea 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Hemerocallis hybrid Daylilly 5 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Lavandula stoechas Spanish Lavender 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/Low Leptospermum scoparium New Zealand Tea Tree 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Leymus condensatus Giant Wild Rye 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/ Low Leymus triticoides Creeping Wild Rye 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/ Low Nandina domestica Heavenly Bamboo 5 gallon 4' O.C. Low Nassella pulchra Purple Needle Grass 1 gallon 2' O.C. Low/Very Low Pyracantha 'Santa Cruz' Firethorn 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Salvia clevelandii Cleveland Sage 5 gallon 4' O.C. Low/Very Low Salvia leucantha Mexican Bush Sage 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/Low Salvia spathacea Hummingbird Sage 5 gallon 5' OC Low/Very Low Sporobolus airoides Alkalai sacaton 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/ Low Xylosma congestum Shiny xylosma 5 gallon 5' O.C. Medium GROUNDCOVER: Acacia redolens Prostrate Acacia 5 gallon 4' O.C. Low/Very Low Baccharis 'Centennial' Desert Broom 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Baccharis pilularis 'Twin Peaks' Coyote Bush 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Coprosma kirki Creeping Coprosma 5 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Cotoneaster sp. Cotoneaster 5 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Pelargonium peltatum Ivy Geranium 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Lantana montevidensis Lantana 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium/ Low Myoporum pavifolium Myoporum 5 gallon 4' O.C. Medium Trachelospermum asiaticum Star Jasmine 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium VINES: Antigonon leptopus Coral Vine 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Disticus buccinatoria Blood Red Trumpet 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Vine Clematis lasiantha Chaparral Clematis 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium/ Low Hardenbergia violacea Lilac Vine 1 gallon 2" O.C. Medium/ Low Lonicera japonica 'Halliana' Hall's Honeysuckle 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Tracelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine 1 gallon 2' O.C. Medium Exhibit N: Typical Interior Lot Landscape Treatment I j SHRUBS 10� r �I ° GROUND COVER I GALLON �i_ 'j��'k All W i i , tot isi / ii SHRUBS LARGE TREE r :� f � �_�„ 5 GALLON 15 GALLON � _�,� -• DRIVEWAY ,,w } � 1 !k,..:,,,ei,_ *404111 „0"/„.. 110., . it f '': t,„20. ilis iiiir P.' UTILITY EASEMENT 1i: k" "- Iltr___, rit S GALLON ♦`:• let /.. 1 .- A. Alin '''''-' SMALL TREE , TYPICAL INTERIOR LOT STREET TREE .. 24"BOX This Exhibit is an artistic interpretation of the private landscape treatment on a typical lot based on a minimum 10 foot front setback, minimum 5 foot interior side yard,and minimum 12 foot driveway width.This image is not to be taken as the final design and the types of plants shown in this image may vary within the Arbor Vista Landscape Plant Palette and the sizes and amounts of planting material shall comply with Section17.32.090 of the Municipal Code.The final landscape plan shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variation in the placement,location, and spacing is expected as allowed in PDO-13. Exhibit 0: Typical Corner Lot Landscaping A jr 1111, �� FRONT PORCH '! I tit ,..._ _..„ . _ r .�al.. l i r ` li„ _11; itm,„,r y TU� SHRUBS,, S GALLON 111lk : • - •UTILITY DRIVEWAY j ; EASEMENT �_ ,r,Ir VII fr A '''N— _ / 4 t"i- 1111111. . SMALLTREE +, LARGE TREE 5 GALLON y: _ 15 GALLON GROUND COVER • STREETTREE -- 24"BOX TYPICAL CORNER LOT This Exhibit is an artistic interpretation of the private landscape treatment on a typical lot based on a minimum 10 foot front setback, minimum 5 foot interior side yard,and minimum 12 foot driveway width. This image is not to be taken as the final design and the types of plants shown in this image may vary within the Arbor Vista Landscape Plant Palette and the sizes and amounts of planting material shall comply with Section17.32.090 of the Municipal Code.The final landscape plan shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variation in the placement,location, and spacing is expected as allowed in PDO-13 Exhibit P: Typical Cul-de-Sac Lot Landscaping r 1 • .1 - ' SHRUBS t� G 6;461�� 5 GALLON . _ F 002,01— ^• a -t 0.11 � ^�.4( SHRUBS , $' .^ � , I� SGALLON ih, TIO VV. NI �LARGE TREE SMALLTREE 15 GALLON - DRIVEWAY 11114 5 GALLON , ,''„, Ail Illra -- , -:./- - GROUND COVER - 1Fip;r7 ?, UTILITY ��.f� f/ EASEMENT ' ..••iKR I y "a STREETTREE 24"BOX lot Vilviv e r �k•, TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC LOT _ This Exhibit is an artistic interpretation of the private landscape treatment on a typical lot based on a minimum 10 foot front setback, minimum 5 foot interior side yard,and minimum 12 foot driveway width. This image is not to be taken as the final design and the types of plants shown in this image may vary within the Arbor Vista Landscape Plant Palette and the sizes and amounts of planting material shall comply with Section17.32.090 of the Municipal Code. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variation in the placement,location,and spacing is expected as allowed in PDO-13 Exhibit Q: Typical Private Slope Area Landscaping •..•., 'ymarg., -.o. .ice v • .- w-- .r ..mow .... 1 1 GROUND 1 �l i {1{ COVER �, } 1+ f t. . . ' i q SHRUBS I GALLON LARGE TREES l I 15 GALLON A ‘ „,` ; 7! + • M r .; LA IS RGGAELO . l ;',1, •• r SHRUBS t...� , r*' .JI ^ it -,7,- ,r j . 'til ...5 GALLON -- J * ;:r›,41ergir libak . -, - '-' 11, LLTREE I �i g 5 SMA GALLON :1)4441 1 tbe ,14 cl. - s 1 ;Ni' ____ _ _ ____. — , km vi lik TYPICAL PRIVATE SLOPE AREA CONCEPTUAL PLANTING FORA 1,300 SF AREA WITH 2.1 SLOPES IN EXCESS OF 8'IN HEIGHT This Exhibit is an artistic interpretation of the private landscape treatment on a typical lot based.This image is not to be taken as the final design and the types of plants shown in this image may vary within the Arbor Vista Landscape Plant Palette and the sizes and amounts of planting material shall comply with Sectionl 7.32.090 of the Municipal Code.The final landscape plan shall be reviewed using these graphics as guidance;however,variation in the placement,location,and spacing is expected as allowed in PDO-13 Exhibit R: Architectural Styles The architecture of the project shall include at least three different architectural styles (Spanish, Craftsman, and Traditional). The architectural styles have been selected to provide variety and individuality to the street scene. The menu of architectural styles is not an exclusive list and other acceptable styles may be approved through the development review process if found compatible with styles listed below. 41116% *Ir - ..."AP+51M. .F"'�a ire ,. r Oier. 1, 14, ' , t r.. . 1 . . 1 - c+r.��,y $ ..dry • } .. 'M '• .eit " _ 'I: -.-. i n ice• ,•,'1ua Spanish Craftsman Traditional Spanish • stucco finish • wood fascias • concrete 'S' tile roof • exposed rafter tails • 4:12 roof pitch • arched multi-pane windows • decorative accent vents • arched entrances • clay pipe accents • front porches or enclosed patios • decorative foam trim elements • decorative wood shutters • decorative tile • feature window on front elevation Craftsman • smooth stucco finish • wide window and door casings • 5:12 roof pitch • exposed rafters • decorative beams and braces under gables • full or partial width porches • wood fascias • tapered porch supports • wood siding • shingle siding or horizontal siding Traditional • front to back gable or hip roof • symmetrical window composition • 5:12 to 12:12 roof pitch • front porch • blended stucco and siding • full wrapped horizontal siding • vertical, multi-paned windows at front • simple wood columned porches • singe pan windows at side or rear • white detailing trim Exhibit S: Architectural Elevations 4 ff fib. f l 'fir —--- ' _= ,v -41► 14 n tr. wnil! - fi- ` V g Craftsman Style Plan 1 - - -.t f' % f ' ,i 1, .1 f � lil M1 _-,4.,-. . ,wail ,S;�., t "pt i-- .11W-1111 l 1 i ' f f 'r..:4, . . .. pair_ •.e. a A JL*. -- Spanish Style Plan 1 yyti �" v. Ckt•• r 40.Z I1; 'Il lt ------ri F, A-I I I � w. k 1N -i- , "fit 1=1=i7. 1 , ,, I I ' 1y. s +.‘. __, _. i,. . 4' - L 1' __iI h1, Traditional Style Plan 1 Exhibit S: Architectural Elevations (Continued) S r .. 'FL ' f '� atiiil11lllitte..-e ° 4.P y'i f s � ,:. _ _ _ ___ , • iT 3r 3c.I�tIa1�fnlr['Ir Ir faw�1 t; '"' IB IS AWAL, ,A. i - - -Pm Craftsman Style Plan 2 ti ygyu . ,ig!% IR 71A MffilM d T3alp"r+G 7A„ li 2110 [ i ;�,,: t" il m ii k`I IN 11{x*II I • 1 Spanish Style Plan 2 , •S Y ' ;r 1.1 fir.. ,,S1 r. - I.a Av ;wry' I _ i=l —a-11_ -- 1 t i., i� — j1-----/7----1-�t: —( !III '-,!, IIIIIIiii6., ' ten I I1 1111111 II1I . , Traditional Style Plan 2 Exhibit S: Architectural Elevations (Continued) A�'{.ryti"fi 4,,,,'i. ..alliI!IIi!h . s. ..r. illffi7 --- X11 __ N - MI Im'AL 11 161° zip II.? y �— .; --I- 0 .1, l ' ..ti,; , .:, , .,i. i 1 II lc. lip ,.it JI41 <1 i. .•Y -11. -.;J0.- .. Craftsman Style Plan 3 a 2 . H i �� � I. � r-------'--._ i _;..- _.._.3"-- r. a '`"P*fY ,r v ti'I^fir rl 'iJ *MC � . ,,. d Spanish Style Plan 3 "t. - r �. .: .y 4 'l ,— 1-:- IR— 1 y A �- F , , , ,,, , ''` .-Ill 1 • "• 4 4 Jr. l..1.... 1 1 --I.,. 1 i II '41 . t sq..' Traditional Style Plan 3 Exhibit S: Architectural Elevations (Continued) r.'': .e1. .0111.=11111111.- �l IlII It .1,a_ ill i I-- I' - .4. , i 1_ ,i, he.- , e- 10- '. , �diill _,/Ilii1�111r1._ l"A U - .. r -r.E-10—ti lt- •6,40:4 ERR+ 0. o. i rII °eI 1:1r1.1 r .,,,,.. .,ii, , ,.,. . ..,. ......., .:„. _:7 -: 0111111% Craftsman Style Plan 4 f n . 'Y ii =� ,,;;.,,. .4..L:.. ,•,,. o s _ r O ® 4 LSi Spanish Style Plan 4 z{4 I . ict to ar-,.. ..,,,,-,..--1-, }}„' 7. i E MIA* ; _ .ALAIL. mAir - - iz,. fr _. Traditional Style Plan 4 Exhibit T: Typical Lot Setback Plan — — —� \ ....A. ,, K °N \ 0 o \ 5 r m 43 m I S 2 I in c m c 0 apegles p:ed op!S°u!yy +n C 1 pry/ — vioegias paed ems uatlry co S E m a IS 2 er L . .1 z a 3 1_4.....3 a H spegkes pied epis•u!I io n°1 w WJewes pied epfs U.iW in W Ce t I N al -Po N Z I , ---,...,,, 3 i i g I R im H yea) 'vetoes pied opts uiyv to ' c Lam° Aaegyas pied apps uplmy In -- r 0, N' I 5 c9 M Z . g I a CL SO _ 1 1 apeglas pied,apes uiyy uo City of Temecula Arbor Vista PDO Application ATTACHMENT A SECTION I.JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSAL The following provides the justifications as required per Section I of the Land Use Amendments: General Plan, Zoning and Specific Plans application. Arbor Vista is a proposal for an 83-unit residential community on 73.3-acres that clusters development in a 22.2-acre area in order to preserve the Santa Gertrudis Creek as natural open space, avoid the 100-year flood plain, improve drainage and water quality, and provide 49.7- acres of public and private recreation and open space area. Implementation of Arbor Vista requires the following amendments to the Zoning Map, Zoning Code text, and General Plan map: • Amend the Zoning Map to add the Planned Development Overlay(PDO). • Amend the text of the Zoning Code to add the Arbor Vista Planned Development Overlay district. • Amend the General Plan map to change the land use designation from Very Low Density Residential (0.2-0.4 Du/Ac Max)to Low Density Residential (0.5-2Du/Ac Max) These amendments are justified due to the following: ZONING AMENDMENT 1. Compatibility with Surrounding Land Uses:The 73-acre parcel is adjacent to Very Low Density Residential designated subdivisions the south and east and Low Medium Density Residential designated subdivisions to the north and west. On a gross basis,the proposed PDO overlay would allow 1.13 dwelling unit per gross acre clustered onto 30%of the site while designating 68%of the site as open space and recreation and preserving the Santa Gertrudis Creek. The proposed development meshes with the character, density, and uses of surrounding residential development. In fact, as the attached sections show,Arbor Vista is largely screened from surrounding development and it will not be possible to get a sense of the scale or density of development from the surrounding properties.The northern edge of Arbor Vista, adjacent to Nicolas Road, is 771' long and would contain a detention basin totaling 280 linear feet while the remaining 491' would be devoted to a public park.The northern side of Nicolas Road contains a bike path, a park, and a concrete-sided drainage channel with a residential subdivision designated as Low Medium Density Residential beyond.The western edge of Arbor Vista, which is adjacent to Via Lobo Road and abuts a residential subdivision designated as Low Medium Density Residential, contains a detention basin, landscaped slope, and a park. Seven residential lots are located along this side of Arbor Vista but set back a minimum of 27'from the Via Lobo Road right-of-way.The eastern edge, which is 3330 linear feet and abuts property designated and developed as Very Low Density Residential, is devoted entirely to open space except for portions of four residential lots.The southern edge of Arbor Vista is natural open space Regent Properties January 28,2014 City of Temecula Arbor Vista PDO Application preserving the Santa Gertrudis Creek. Finally, Nicolas Road would be landscaped and treated in a manner consistent with the Nicolas Valley Design Guidelines. 2. Quality of Life:The proposed amendments allow a slight increase in density,which would be clustered on the northern section of the site in order to preserve the natural water course on the southern edge of the project, and allow for the improvement of regional drainage and water quality and the provision of a portion of the regional trail and public and private parks, which will enhance the quality of life not only for Arbor Vista residents, but for the entire community. By clustering development on the site, 83 residential lots can be developed on 22.2 acres of the site, allowing for the preservation of 43.3 acres of the site for open space and approximately 6.4 acres for park space.The plan also includes a proposed public regional trail that will connect with the City's Trail Plan. Furthermore,the proposed development area is situated so that development will not be clearly visible from the Nicolas or Via Lobo Roads due to the uses proposed along the edges (discussed above) and elevation of the site (see attached sections).As a result,views of the site from surrounding properties will not be negatively impacted. The proposed amendments allows for development to be clustered on the northern section of the site while preserving the natural water course in the southern section.The proposed development would include approximately 1.4 acres of detention basins that would improve drainage in the area, reduce water volumes flowing directly into the creek thereby reducing flood threats, and function as a filter for pollutants and sediment prior to entering the creek. 3. Infrastructure:The proposed 83-unit development area will provide new water, sewer, and roadway infrastructure and result in needs for city services, such as police and fire. However, the proposal includes an additional 54 lots above what would be permitted by the existing zoning, which would not represent a significant increase in demand.The provision of parks, a regional trail, preservation of Santa Gertrudis Creek, and flood and drainage improvements would help offset any demands for services and infrastructure. 4. Legal Non-conforming Use: All uses within the proposed PDO conform to uses specified in the City Zoning Code for residential uses and would not result in any legal non-conforming uses. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 1. Consistency with the General Plan:The project involves amending the General Plan map from Very Low Density Residential to Low Density Residential. The residential use would not change; however,the permitted density would increase as a result of the amendment. Upon amendment,the proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan.As will be documented in the Planned Development Overlay and Home Product Review process,the project would be consistent with the other provisions of the General Plan. 2.Traffic Impact:The project would result in an additional 54 units above what is permitted by the current general plan designation, or approximately 794 daily trips (ITE Manual of 9.57 trips per detached unit) and approximately 79 PM peak hour trips, which does not represent a significant increase in vehicular trips.The provision of a section of the regional trail that would Regent Properties January 28,2014 City of Temecula Arbor Vista PDO Application be realized by proposed project would help provide regional connectivity, provide both recreational benefits and commute options, and help reduce vehicular trips. 3. Impact on Welfare of Surrounding Residents:See response#2 under the zoning amendment section above. 4. Consistency with Surrounding Character:See response#1 under the zoning amendment section above. Regent Properties January 28,2014 rr,Y P , 4 0 -I4,kJ ZC .� D Z w w C4 wQw U II,4. 1-aU D 411 - Sw A.40P Ir N. r ,P.I 4 4 w U N z ' O 17 j. Q rr f ti s Z �- x�Y z 4.-41. . p . H )7..+x,..:4-.J , c 1 r /in o• - 41 M b .„ O W J 4r {.- iv.. g III b= o iii CI:I O tar)) 10 s oc CU Q Regent Properties January 28,2014 City of Temecula Arbor Vista P00 Application 0 Z= ZI w Z at w<(Z V Jw 1-0_00 r4.44, tf,iv.4‘.,-:,--,, ,, . a_ Qt.) __41 / !4, ,, .„1 , .\. < ._ „,„,. 1 ,, z ,,, _ "t„ / ,_. _ . , , 0 ,v. . el., • ,,,, f ,F. ' 1 Q A . --fg7`M, 4 i ' s m u _= a m tr1 1 ',l 2w - - 1. }( d W S � O .r J w I W 6 g CO ,', � m o& t ,` Z Eu c°' 0 sI J W W T1 WA 1 0 1 ( ±� O }—I Z 'd'4 —_ J mV 9 g Z J 1 1 Oa. I- . . v : 1 Q 1-0 o wu G J 6. w 1 z W y_. id) __ a O 1 Ce m w c ,}ri o o ¢ to fra Q V) Regent Properties January 28, 2014 City of Temecula Arbor Vista P00 Application 11( 1,t • a z� u, zz{as � U pp QP • J W ,Fr, , r ?'7.1, z_ I K F t I g (( J g p- v( , r kJ ) /(1. 3 ,4.;tt. % :,,, ' ,, a. � �q ,' . Y « 1 X11 � 3a W ,1 ir 0 III g 0 4} ffi° a. w > In I _ fC 0 III Q E 'U O V 1 ZS CO QJ V) ce v Q Regent Properties January 28,2014 lip 7"11 -1,- . .•. LI.J • • ,_.., 4 I . .. . ' Ct 0 . . . .0. , . .7. 1 > . 411P i. .$ .. • \1/4 .4.,.. r,• . ., , r, • JO • li -‘.-- ' A , . k 1 1. IL : # I • i •- -- - 1 ,•' Ig. ...- • ----• -,,-.-- 1 r,:rt- ii . • . , . 4 F... • 14 • - •• . . .. 7 C I 0 0 U•h `1--1-'') • 4id •,, . , .1116 , L•, ' loo• 4:- .. .',',-- ' A--... -* f Ji ,. .. ir ..,,•.,., fowl ' 4 -- •-•. - ,0 % . . ,- .. ,. . • . ,..,, . , 4 - .-. 1-. .. ,•t. '' •,i,T• i 7' .1.•... 1 ..-'' '4414: ' 1.': - ':.....!' . r .. 4 I A .. ".1i.' ilr.,'- ','■17'''''-.'' ,,,_ _4.,...k,-,:ffiliit••'‘ , .1.- •4. It.'' ill i. ..4 i. ...- '', -. .,,.,,,s ...I ii; ■4 SrabillkirfAra , , ,- ` - ■)---V:4.4,..-- %• . .,,„ LAN k;. Ifr tio C, , 4.• .: .. . . ' " 1' .. - ...' " " ,• ..' • ,.,•: . ....- , . t .. 0 „,....... I, id:J.' '' ';'•'" 1 . .. • ,f • ' t'.' ' nr - • ','''",.., :I , t r lo• .• .. 1 , q 1 ill* li . — . — ,—,. 1,,, - , , „ •••,„ ,„. - . • ': ., = .., • , .N„ .iiitt •,. . -,4 .• .44 ( '4 1..,41°. I ' ' .. , le , • • '4--. .11 ' ' .t. ti., it= r . -• 1 - - 1 AI' I •• ; .4." N.", ' —- ' ■. •, iir,l',, I .,. 4... .A .,. , , I, • — -._?-4. ;3'• 5 .:,;:s.i. ,,, 1 1 , 4 ' •--- ,. -5t°04 7'*; w ;; -.. , e■ ir. .. .. , ,. ' •) '''' ,., '. t"4",.` 1.• -':, , . P ) .4 4,, . , ' _"•?. • . I , - ' t I. '3-' -4- - > 'il . ttil . ___—...-..i..... , took . If . ',"*11-:;•'' '' '1 e 0 , LA ' t • ' • ..' 4, , CC 1. ri•i4v , .^. ).. ,,:j.'' *•A .1 , , t.J • . ' 4 . .,- v- 00. ''- If 1 ... vir2„I‘t ... . .. ,,,.'‘ , 4 - ',' • - a r0: I - •" , - fa , . .., '•I'S.-.1 CL 1•• iii: , Ilk 0 - , . > tit 1 '' • - , ' 0 U•110)11/U t. - 111' , - .' .•. ^ 1... . . . '.1. < .,...„ - - - ,:,'; ‘14•simr,-4,11 .. i. w LLI I-- -, IP .'". J d4 .,,, I ,. I , -• If 0 MI. , . I 0 ,,,,■,,-..ki,Jti_ _' - .' , ' - ,r,..45,„41 411*.1 Of 4 11 i r...• J..- Ill ' , t , - - . t- # - •••%'. i ,, .-,•-, .,;. ,. .. ,.--• ..• r .t • .1 Fli,,- , ■ 1—, ; .T • ' Ji. .■ . " IN _ _ '4 ' ' /' ' IS' • 1111111"" ,.- r • JO .- ''• .4 71. _ ' .4.j, • • i .. ... - ' ' - t r .• 4 . .. •* Ti . . I ..' 't•'2. IP ' •4.• • t ,:• -../ - 411 4., ..., -* 4 ' , l' , • I** „I ' t t ... -. •,1.....# . .1,1_ ',,tilitN:of .i1P.' ' l. •:••• 1 4A2 t •"."■-t„,.:' ' ' li, Is ,,,....,___._. 1 -• ,,,... 11....„..1-.. • _ _ 4'7.• S.. ,14 1:1 4 *;'' • 4 nor - v.' .-- q -4,- ' .f.:-',20 , a . • -', a'A■ J7 i k .0,,,:a ii, ,4 .:- , I .., li , , .„. , ; i -:' .i f.$4 • ' `'''-. ' , iwiff A ,.0-1Pit — ,•." ., , .. . 1 `'it■IS '-"f-• 41 4_,. - ,I.t Sk •:,00.,,,, •''-' I '. { . 4r,.'13r 1•' 1 f-''7,• .'1‘•,• ' - .. • • I fit 4 ob, , , ..,,.. . _,-4• , 44, . •• , Tr 0 1.-'t '• I.' t 1,-.,.;.-1, •01 i > 0 CC 1'..1 . ••■ --- / ..' :I, ' .. 1 4 < ' .,' .„.„111,44.2en,1 i 0,, '' •■•,, U , I 1 • , •, 1 .1, 73 M 4 j'...«i . .-• * — a , r i# . •,--' -,# _c , , . .A:, •-:-.:-, . .• LA rt: ..., , - a,,,,.... ...#‘40 ....... , , 1 ti) . ......_ , . . rt, 0- 1 , 1'1%,•10 0 I ' i.`, , • ' , • , i .m. 11103 . _• ,. . , . . ,_ ,cz _ .", ,... ••I• . I; 1.11111 - -- . -,....,,_. •Ti. . . . . UJ.., .. .,- . 111.- .;,,.• . , ., . • . 111101111i : 4, ! 2" •.. .-. Cr . 0 • . ( .01;41:4' . _ ..,,,,, . ,. III A i , • i• . • Mr• ',It lIl • • . • ' ,a..., ., 'K' .• ' ' 1 .',4r .4 ■:•; !„ ' r ' V .-. h'' .•4"' „'' :.-; .- ,111...il. ' ' ip: . , . ., , :. ,.„..,.,...„. ...,..s.„... i . „ 11,,' l'''' .,V.':,,l',,, '...'•,-,,,,s,• r„'''...IT 1,11A:sr:I` I, •• . I.' •:II•0" .....' Li'' '.7 • :''...""Ailt P" 0 ,it,; • , 1.. ' ' -'' - ''.' '':-''.' ' '-''''''1‘..- •' . i '' ''. '',.P'"',•:'''.4%. :-■':■, — N•,. . • '.' -'''''.' '..l',..'.''.' ' .: _ • _ .■, ..• . . ,, . • ' 1 . ' r ".04 .. :''.. i''4.* - te.i.'. ' R . , • ,• — • .t..,II, 4 i - , • 4.8,,•' ' ., • ' 0 -r'•,,''. '4.4 _ ' .-_•'',•• ." I. •-•.i....".••- • ,,. • H ' .' .r:- 422-r'..,'--••• •:- I •• -. -•-,' -.. .,11 ;,:‘•- ''S' ,A1 ! s r 1•,, ., .. 4,0,4,A . , „.;'.. "..,ir , '.. •,7.',-, ,..-,.,.i"ii.. • 4( I 1 I , 4 Illi. ..- .. ' ' • I - - ''' ' le..; •' •4 .. - ..„.- ! 14 ,. . ' ".• .• 11'.;.•;:t'''. ..4.''''• .• ••-• .• 'Ise 41 PIN. e ..1„:..4.( ,'ii• -A: .. r • .:: f . • _. ... t .,.... . . rr- , i , .....21; ...., ...... IF Si. ''' 4 -• r . . ,j,,:* . . Is mils .,.;•, • I t . 1 f 11• ''."'.. '-e-,.. 7-.• 4:,'. : ,. 111111 )11v)oli. litir4 . . - - - - - I ' • :.= ,...• _ . . .,. os. . . . ...,..,. 1 . • 11' i . t t r r• ," 1 • 1 ' , 1 , • • .4.1 1 Tr , c •.71 CC •-., • 4 l'iliall U,- - .'4 /■.-• 13 .. M. a.,..'-, - ..-7 4-■I. ,-- ..... d If M -') ' ' • -4e....-. : ., • 0, ,y _ — . a .., ..I/4 .{ r i •9 II, , ' — V), . .0 ■I.,., , )_ ro. ..,. .. . , • , ' ,f1! • 4.4 : v.. ' •iftit. .4. .; ' . . ,, iutioDuilui-xalioA ' •. a- , ' < 1 i , .. . . ■ la . ... i i ,,lac. • : ( - II- Ct 0 , 1 ' 446'.-.1%et '1 # t li: , 1.... „ .... - 1 ... • , . I I • " • "Mt • •-I- ,47.16666F.SPIMSRIF.;: I. . 141 • / I II i 111 I. 1.14 , • a ll ,, , I ri A :*. I - -•1• •AN ,, . n s .7. 'at ._1. NA-'' At, 1,....*'4, • I. I .. . , .. 1$ '..-1...br-' 1 • ' ''''wf. ,',0'411...,' ' . i -„...,.., OfillillASs 'F 1 . ,'. t — ...,,.. 4 i - \44119' )1 *A'leit . . I , r . .r. . . i ,. - ' *■ ' ; oli' -..... _ .fr 4 :..-; . --.. . . 'P 0 Itt.1 A • - Wk. , ' :10 cC .. , .. .. i 1:3 - to ..0 0 ro " I 'K.' • CI. 441 . ro • 1 • v.) lt ,. > 0 a .* LUODlitill-xatioA -1,0,-- ..C2 6. .. . _ ... U ©,...._ E N ;∎ i N u u�i." d^ N. H r ____. LULL D r , 1 ti I . . . 1.--.c\ _ 0 Q .I i CL i I _.__7. = 1.. 7 " \' al-M ) l\ I / I \ - I -I NL 4 E / N. N, CO , r If I• i 1 1 1 i 1 It 1 . k 1 1 U o a 1 E i i i a = 10 E f f f m LL LL LL 1 Z gX 3 m I E 6f ff as of a C- o 1 l0 �� i�g u� �3 a 0 N Ery \ Mw ..i 1�.1 .�-i� NN Z Nry m in E (� o Lfl M JJ \ O\1 N d « ry .. .. .. Z N N x J O e e N a h-d V) '0 e' N ■ w cL ..ii .. > ppp co W '00 0 Z ° riw f N Euo dm 30 2 O - l0 0 O Z E. ..,, L9m Z.,..'E, Ora wa,. LL O .--1 .a rr W a°° ^ 0ae ns p0 in Q Q Z W au �> => a°> ¢> i�� o 03 n a Wa' g FJ 0 3 3 g > ~ ce °` 9 a- a a p U Q VI n Q } IR 0 a 0 u 0 0 V) I— U) l7 a PC RESOLUTION TENTATIVE TRACT MAP PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0133, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 GROSS ACRES INTO 83 LOTS AND ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD" (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on May 21 , 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map 36479, Planning Application No. PA12-0133 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The 83-lot subdivision of a 73 gross acre site will result in a density of 1.13 units per acre, which is within the allowable density range of 0.5 to 2.9 units per acre consistent with a PDO based on L-Low Density Standards. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The Initial Study and special reports prepared for the project indicate that there will not be any significant impacts to the environment. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the Initial Study and associated mitigation outlined in the special reports prepared for the project have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements have been considered in the design of the subdivision, and will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required easements and dedication are required as Conditions of Approval. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby); The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby), because payment of Quimby fees will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Tentative Tract Map 36479, PA12-0133: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on April 21, 2014, and expired on May 20, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Section 1. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479 to subdivide 73 gross acres into 83 lots and associated open space located at the southeast corner of Via Lobo and Nicolas Road (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached to the City Council Resolution, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of May, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0133, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 GROSS ACRES INTO 83 LOTS AND ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21 , 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30-day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14- adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving Tentative Tract Map 36479 hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code; The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The 83-lot subdivision of a 73 gross acre site will result in a density of 1.13 units per acre, which is within the allowable density range of 0.5 to 2.9 units per acre consistent with a PDO based on L-Low Density Standards. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965; The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map; The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The Initial Study and special reports prepared for the project indicate that there will not be any significant impacts to the environment. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the Initial Study and associated mitigation outlined in the special reports prepared for the project have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval and a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible; The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements have been considered in the design of the subdivision, and will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required easements and dedication are required as Conditions of Approval. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby); The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby), because payment of Quimby fees will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Gwyn R. Flores, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Planning Application No. PA12-0133 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Also, other portions of the site associated with the residential component result in another four acres, or approximately 59% of the site preserved as permanent open space. Environmental issues have been avoided by designing a compact development footprint, staying away from the existing drainage onsite, and designating the drainage and sensitive portions of the site as Open Space (OS). Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. Assessor's Parcel No.: APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020 MSHCP Category: Single-Family Residential (less than 8 du/ac) DIF Category: Residential - Detached TUMF Category: Single-Family Residential Quimby Category: Single-Family with Attached Garage Approval Date: To be Determined by City Council Expiration Date: To be Determined by City Council PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL-2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 5 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved tentative tract map contained on file with the Planning Division. PL-7. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-8. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-9. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. PL-10. Compliance with City Noise Ordinance. The project shall operate in conformance with all requirements and regulations of Chapter 9.20 (Noise) of the Temecula Municipal Code. PL-11. Subdivision Map Act. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made prior to the expiration date. PL-12. Subdivision Phasing. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. PL-13. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. PL-14. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL-15. Class II Bicycle Lanes. Class II bicycle lanes, as specified in the City of Temecula Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, shall be identified on the street improvement plans, and constructed in concurrence with the street improvements. PL-16. Class I Multi-Use Trails. Class I multi-use trails shall be provided as per the City of Temecula's Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for the Class I trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-17. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL-18. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. PL-19. Archaeoloqical/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL-20. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL-21. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." PL-22. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." PL-23. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." PL-24. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." PL-25. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." PL-26. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. PL-27. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL-28. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits associated with PA12-0134, Home Product Review PL-29. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. PL-30. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. PL-31. Quimby Requirements. The developer satisfied the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement by constructing a 6.4 acre park on site. PL-32. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-33. Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL-34. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL-35. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-36. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL-37. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-38. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL-39. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). PL-40. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: PL-41. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL-42. WQMP Treatment Devices. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. PL-43. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-44. Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-45. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-46. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL-47. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL-48. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-49. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-50. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. PL-51. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map PL-52. Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. PL-53. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. This property is located in the French Valley Airport Land Use Overlay Zone, and shall comply with all mitigation identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. PL-54. Park Lot. Lot 91 should be identified as a lettered lot, and further described as a public park that is maintained by the Home Owners Association (HOA). PL-55. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. PL-56. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. PL-57. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. PL-58. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. PL-59. CC&Rs and Management and Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project's Water Quality Management Plan. PL-60. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. PL-61. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. PL-62. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. PL-63. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. PL-64. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&Rs shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. PL-65. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. PL-66. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA 1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. 2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. 3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. 4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. PL-67. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant's signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City's review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City's consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. Armando G. Villa Director Community Development Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney PL-68. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. PL-69. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. PL-70. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. PL-71. Public Access Easement. A public access easement shall be provided, on the final map, for the Class I trail located on the property. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL-72. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated August 1, 2012, and September 24, 2013, copies of which are attached. PL-73. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated July 26, 2012, a copy of which is attached. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F-1. Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F-2. Fire Flow (Residential). The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-3. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" 2 '/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart at each intersection, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for single family dwellings The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-4. Water System. If the fire service system is going to be a public water system then this will need to be documented by the water agency and submitted to the fire department. If the fire service system is going to be private then a separate fire service underground permit will be required by the fire department. F-5. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F-6. Turning Radius (Culdesac). Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum outside turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 37-feet for single family dwelling. (CFC Chapter 5 along with the Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-7. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-8. Turning Radius (Dead End Roadway). Prior to building construction, dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-9. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for residential track home roads with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F-10. Two Point Access. This development, and any street within, serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments, shall have two points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). F-11. Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required per the California Residential Code, 2013 edition to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. F-12. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop for the underground water system. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 5 and Chapter 33). F-13. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F-14. Hydrant Markers. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) per Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F-15. Knox Box. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. PW-2. Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tentative/Final Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-3. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. PW-4. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. From Public Works for public offsite improvements PW-5. Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, traffic signal plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. PW-6. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW-7. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. PW-8. DG Multipurpose Trail. The multipurpose trail shall be privately maintained. Prior to Recordation of the Tract Map PW-9. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. PW-10. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. PW-11. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. PW-12. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; b. Army Corps of Engineers; c. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; e. Rancho California Water District; f. Eastern Municipal Water District; g. Cable TV Franchise; h. Telephone Company; i. Southern California Edison Company; j. The Gas Company; k. Metropolitan Water District or other affected agencies. PW-13. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Nicolas Road on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. PW-14. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Via Lobo Road on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. PW-15. Easements. Note the following: a. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Final Map. b. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Final Map. A note shall be added to the Final Map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." PW-16. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements to the City's General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve Nicolas Road (Modified Principal Arterial Standard No. 100 —110' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, seven (7) foot wide planter area, five (5) food wide sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median. b. The Developer shall install or provide a cash in-lieu for half-width raised landscape median improvements on Nicolas Road from Via Lobo to the easterly property boundary. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. c. Improve Via Lobo Road from Nicolas Road to Station 90+52 to include a 44-foot wide dedication of the easterly half-width street right-of-way, installation of a twenty (20) foot wide half-width street improvements to include paving, curb and gutter; six (6) foot wide sidewalk, twelve (12) foot wide planter area, six (6) foot wide D.G. multipurpose trail, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). d. Improve Via Lobo Road from Station 90 + 52 to Station 89 + 76 to include a 44- foot wide dedication of the easterly half-width street right-of-way, installation of a twenty (20) foot wide half-width street improvements to include paving, curb and gutter; six (6) foot wide sidewalk, twelve (12) foot wide planter area, six (6)foot wide D.G. multipurpose trail, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW-17. Private Roads. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve "A", "B", "D", "E", and "C" Street east of "E" Street (Private Street - 41' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. b. Improve "C" Street west of "E" Street (Private Street - 37' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk, as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. c. Improve "C" Street at the main entry (Private Street — 81.5' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. PW-18. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. PW-19. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider's standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City's cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. PW-20. Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer (at developer's cost). The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. PW-21. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. PW-22. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. PW-23. Election Proceeding. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Finance Department to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of street lighting into the appropriate maintenance program (Service Level B). All cost associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. PW-24. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City's GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-25. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; b. Army Corps of Engineers; c. California Department of Fish and Wildlife; d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or other affected agencies. PW-26. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringconst manual.htm PW-27. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. PW-28. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.sht ml PW-29. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project- specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/WQMPandN PDE S/WQMP.htm PW-30. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. PW-31. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100-year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. PW-32. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. PW-33. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. PW-34. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-35. Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36479 shall be approved and recorded. PW-36. Traffic Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall provide a right-turn overlap phasing at the northbound and westbound approaches of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road as established in Table B - Cost Estimate Summary identified in the Arbor Vista Residential — Final Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures dated May 13, 2014. PW-37. Traffic Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of the 40th building permit, the Developer shall pay the amount established in Table B - Cost Estimate Summary identified in the Arbor Vista Residential — Final Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures dated May 13, 2014. PW-38. Street Lights. The developer shall submit a completed SCE street light application, an approved SCE Streetlight Plan and pay the advanced energy fees. If not obtaining a building permit, this shall be done prior to installation of additional street lighting. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing street lights shall be paid by the developer. PW-39. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-40. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all onsite work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. PW-41. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. PW-42. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. PW-43. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. tIVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNIT\. =ALTH AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RECEIVED August 1, 2012 AUG 1 6 2012 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Matthew Peters P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA—PLANNING APPLICATION (PA)#12-0133 & PA#12-0134-TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 (APN#919-350-017, 018, 019, 120) Dear Mr. Peters: The project(s)listed in the subject heading of this letter is proposing to subdivide 73 acres into 73 single family cluster lots with a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet. Approximately 55% of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage on-site. A public park and a private park are proposed along with water quality retention basins. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health(DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the proposed project: POTABLE WATER SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE: A General Condition shall be placed on this project indicating the proposal for Rancho California Water District(RCWD)potable water service and Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD) sanitary sewer service. Per Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Riverside and EMWD,no "will-serve"letters are required for projects located in their service area. Therefore, a"will-serve" letter shall not be required from EMWD for sanitary sewer service. However, a"will-serve"letter for potable water service shall be required from RCWD prior to Planning Department approval of this project. It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water service and sanitary sewer service are met with the appropriate purveyors, as well as, all other applicable agencies. RETENTION BASINS A General Condition shall be placed on this project indicating that any proposed retention basins shall be constructed and maintained in a manner that prevents vector breeding and vector nuisances. Matthew Peters,Project Plane.:: City of Temecula, Planning Department August 1, 2012 REMOVAL/ABANDONMENT OF ANY EXISTING OWTS AND WELLS: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit,the developer shall be required to properly remove or abandon under permit with DEH, all existing onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) and water wells. A grading plan showing the location of all existing OWTS and wells to be removed or abandoned shall be submitted to DEH for review and approval. DEH fees shall apply. If there are no existing OWTS and/or wells to be removed or abandoned,the developer shall submit a written statement to this Department for review and consideration. INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE Written clearance from the County of Riverside, Industrial Hygiene shall be required. Please note that a noise study may be required along with applicable review fees. For further information,please contact Industrial Hygiene at(951) 955-8982. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT—PHASE I/PHASE II An Environmental Assessment(EA)Phase I study shall be required prior to Planning Department approval of this project. Please submit an EA Phase I study and applicable review fees to DEH Environmental Cleanups Program(ECP). For further information,please contact ECP at(951) 955- 8982. Phase I Environmental Assessment—The intent of a Phase I Assessment is to determine if any chemicals or pesticides were used on the property, the location of use, and any possible lingering negative effects.This condition requires the applicant to compile sufficient information about the property and land uses to aid the Department in making a determination of whether additional investigation is needed. If concerns are identified in this report, a Phase II Assessment shall be required. Phase II Environmental Assessment—The intent of a Phase II Assessment is to further investigate concerns identified during the Phase I Assessment.This Phase II Assessment could ascertain if levels of hazardous or toxic substances remain in the soil. The Phase II Assessment would be waived if the Phase I Assessment indicated a low level of concern for any hazardous or toxic substances. Please note that the Environmental Assessment process serves to protect public health and welfare by lessening the change of hazardous or toxic substances remaining on the property and interfering with safe land use. Environmental Resources Management Division•Land Use/Water Engineering Program 4080 Lemon St.,2"d Floor,Riverside,CA 92501•(951)955-8982•FAX(951) 781-9653 38686 El Cerrito Rd.,Palm Desert, CA 92211 •(760)393-3390•FAX(760)863-7013 Matthew Peters,Project Plannk._ City of Temecula, Planning Department August 1,2012 Should you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact me at(951) 955-8980. c r11y, fr 1 Mich Mistica, MBA, REHS County of Riverside,Department of Environmental Health Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Environmental Resources Management Division•Land Use/Water Engineering Program 4080 Lemon St.,2nd Floor,Riverside,CA 92501 •(951)955-8982•FAX(951)781-9653 38686 El Cerrito Rd.,Palm Desert, CA 92211•(760)393-3390•FAX(760)863-7013 IVERSIDE COUNTY COMMUNIT* _ALTH AGENCY ZA414411:K44416 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH August 1, 2012 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Matthew Peters P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA—PLANNING APPLICATION(PA)#12-0131 & PA#12-0132—GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE (APN#919-350-017,018,019, 120) Dear Mr. Peters: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health(DEH)and the City of Temecula,DEH has reviewed the planning case(s) referenced in the subject heading of this letter and has no objections. Please be advised that DEH reserves the right to regulate in accordance with County Ordinances should further information indicate the requirements. If you have any questions regarding this letter please contact me at(951) 955-8980. rojk ichael Mistica,MBA, REHS County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health Environmental Protection and Oversight Division COUNTY OF RIVERSID DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Steve Van Stockum, Director September 24, 2013 City of Temecula Department j r,, Attn: Eric Jones, Project Planner `` ` 'y 6 1,1 P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 SUBJECT: PA#12-0133—ARBOR VISTA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36749 SECOND SUBMITTAL (APNs#919-350-017, 018, 019, 120) Dear Mr. Jones: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health(DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH has completed its review of the second submittal of planning case PA#12-0133. Based on the information provided,the planning application is seeking to obtain approval of a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. This project is located at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads in Temecula, CA. Please note that the project's initial comments mentioned in the DEH letter dated August 1, 2012 remains applicable. Should you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact me by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sind z y, 1 ichael Mistica,MBA, REHS Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Land Use and Water Resources Program Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside • Phone: (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org COUNTY OF RIVERSID`� DEPAR 1'MENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Steve Van Stockum, Director September 24, 2013 'F z City of Temecula :` 7 s` Planning Department ' `'`'�. ' Attn: Eric Jones,Project Planner ''r' ` P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589 SUBJECT: SECOND SUBMITTAL—ARBOR VISTA-RPR, CZ, & GPA PA#12-0131, PA#12-0132, & PA#12-0134 (APNs#919-350-017, 018, 019, 120) Dear Mr. Jones: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH has completed its review of the second submittal of the planning cases listed in the subject heading of this letter and has no objections. Please be advised that DEH reserves the right to regulate in accordance with County Ordinances should further information indicate the requirements. Should you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact me at(951) 955-8980. Si, y, diichael Mistica,MBA, REHS Environmental Protection and Oversight Division Land Use and Water Resources Program Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside • Phone: (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org July 26,2012 Rancho Water Matthew Peters JUL x� City of Temecula B}, 41000 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 Board of Directors Temecula, CA 92589-9033 John E.Hoagland President SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY Ben R.Drake Sr.Vice President ARBOR VISTA (TENTATIVE TRACT/PARCEL MAP Stephen J.Corona NO. 36479); PARCEL NOS. 1 THROUGH 4 TOGETHER Lisa D.Herman WITH LETTERED LOTS B THROUGH H INCLUSIVE, William E.Plummer AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP NO. 9783, ON FILE IN Roland C.Skumawitz BOOK 54, PAGE 45; APNS 919-350-017, 919-350-018, 919- James"Stew"Stewart 350-019,AND 919-350-020 [REGENT NICOLAS 73] Officers Dear Mr. Peters: Matthew G.Stone General Manager Please be advised that the above-referenced project/property is located within Richard S.Williamson,P.E. Assistant General Manager the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD/District). Jeffrey D.Armstrong The subject project/property fronts an existing 12-inch diameter water pipeline Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer (1380 Pressure Zone) and 54-inch diameter pipeline (1305 Pressure Zone) N.Craig Elitharp,P.E. Director of Operations& within Nicolas Road. Maintenance Perry R.Louck Director of Planning Water service to the subject project/property does not exist. Additions or Andrew L.Webster,P.E. modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Chief Engineer Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the Kelli E.Garcia District Secretary completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. James B.Gilpin Best Best&Krieger LLP General Counsel Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water meters for landscape irrigation, as applicable. Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment, as determined by the Lead Agency. 12\PD:hab003\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road•Post Office Box 9017•Temecula,` 'ahowaor cn 92589-9017•(951)296-6900•FAX(951)296.6860 Matthew Peters/City of Temecula July 26,2012 Page Two There is no recycled water currently available within the limits established by Resolution 2007- 10-5. Should recycled water become available in the future, the project/property may be required to retrofit its facilities to make use of this availability in accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. As soon as feasible, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project-specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project-specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board and/or the basin plan objectives and the permit conditions issued by the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at the District office at(951)296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT 44. Oatidat.P-.._ Phillip Dauben Assistant Engineer cc: Corey Wallace,Engineering Manager-Design Warren Back,Engineering Manager-Planning Heath McMahon,Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith,Engineering Services Supervisor 12\PD:hab003\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road•Post Office Box 901?•Temecula,California J2589-9017•(951)296-6900•FAX(351)296-6860 www.ranchowater.cam PC RESOLUTION HOME PRODUCT REVIEW PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0134, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR ARBOR VISTA LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD" (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on May 21 , 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Home Product Review Application No. PA12-0134 is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State Law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project has been designed to ensure compliance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Home Product Review Application, PA12-0134: A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on April 21, 2014, and expired on May 20, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigate d Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA12-0134, Home Product Review for Arbor Vista located at the southeast corner of Via Lobo and Nicolas Road (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached to the City Council Resolution, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of May, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0134, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR ARBOR VISTA LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21 , 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30-day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Communtiy Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On , the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14- adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Home Product Review application hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; This application is accompanied by a Tentative Tract Map 36479, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project has been designed to ensure compliance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The project is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution and it shall become effective upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Gwyn R. Flores, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Planning Application No. PA12-0134 Project Description: A Residential Home Product Review application for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA12-0133) for four floor plans ranging in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types of each: Craftsman, Spanish, and Traditional. The residential portion of this project is proposed to be gated. However, the residential area is designed to be surrounded by amenities that are open to the public, but privately maintained, including trails, a park with splash pad, and associated parking lot off of Nicolas Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020 MSHCP Category: Single-Family Residential (less than 8 du/ac) DIF Category: Residential - Detached TUMF Category: Single-Family Residential Quimby Category: Single-Family with Attached Garage Approval Date: To be Determined by City Council Expiration Date: To be Determined by City Council PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL-1. Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,231.25) which includes the Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-One Dollars and Twenty-Five Cents ($2,181.25) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of condition [Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements PL-2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL-3. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL-4. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. PL-5. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL-6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. PL-7. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL-8. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL-9. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. PL-10. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. PL-11. Compliance with City Noise Ordinance. The project shall operate in conformance with all requirements and regulations of Chapter 9.20 (Noise) of the Temecula Municipal Code. PL-12. Subdivision Map Act. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. An Extension of Time may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made prior to the expiration date. PL-13. Subdivision Phasing. If subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. PL-14. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. PL-15. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. PL-16. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. PL-17. Class II Bicycle Lanes. Class II bicycle lanes, as specified in the City of Temecula Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan, shall be identified on the street improvement plans, and constructed in concurrence with the street improvements. PL-18. Class I Multi-Use Trails. Class I multi-use trails shall be provided as per the City of Temecula's Multi-Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for the Class I trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL-19. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL-20. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. PL-21. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL-22. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL-23. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." PL-24. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." PL-25. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." PL-26. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." PL-27. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." PL-28. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. PL-29. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." PL-30. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL-31. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. PL-32. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. PL-33. Quimby Requirements. The developer satisfied the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement by constructing a 6.4 acre park on site. PL-34. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL-35. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL-36. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL-37. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL-38. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL-39. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL-40. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). PL-41. Temporary Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscape plans shall indicate that it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. PL-42. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within private common areas. PL-43. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: PL-44. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL-45. WQMP Treatment Devices. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. PL-46. Roof-Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development approval. PL-47. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL-48. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas, including but not limited to, trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL-49. Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. PL-50. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL-51. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL-52. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL-53. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL-54. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL-55. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. PL-56. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION B-1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B-2. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B-3. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, 2013 California Electrical Code, California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. B-4. Green Measures. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards. B-5. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trash enclose tot lots and picnic areas. B-6. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of- way. B-7. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. B-8. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B-9. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B-10. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B-11. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. B-12. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits B-13. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B-14. House Electrical Meter. Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B-15. Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) B-16. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. B-17. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B-18. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B-19. Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION F-1. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of submittal for permits. F-2. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Residential fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW-1. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. PW-2. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW-3. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for onsite improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. PW-4. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. PW-1. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required. An encroachment permit shall be obtained: a. From Public Works for public offsite improvements. PW-2. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. PW-3. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. PW-4. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. PW-5. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-yr storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-yr storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. PW-6. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PW-7. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. PW-8. DG Multipurpose Trail. The multipurpose trail shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PW-9. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. PW-10. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as the San Diego Regional Water Quality Board (401 certification), Army Corps of Engineers (404 certification), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Section 1603 Streambed Alteration Agreement), RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. PW-11. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/engineeringcons tmanual.htm PW-12. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security for private development and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. PW-13. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.sht ml PW-14. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project- specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http://www.cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/Government/PublicWorks/WQMPandNPD ES/WQMP.htm PW-16. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, the developer shall show proof of credit; and no new charge will be required. PW-17. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. PW-18. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100-year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. PW-19. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW-20. Letter of Permission/Easements. The developer shall coordinate with adjacent property owners affected by the project's improvements and shall obtain the required documents such as letters of permission, easement(s) and/or maintenance agreement(s) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. PW-21. Gate Entrances. If gates are being proposed at project entrances, the configuration, stacking distance and turn-around ability shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works and the Fire Department. PW-22. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW-23. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) PW-24. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. PW-25. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. PW-26. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. PW-27. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PW-28. Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map No. 36479 shall be approved and recorded. PW-29. Traffic Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Developer shall provide a right-turn overlap phasing at the northbound and westbound approaches of Winchester Road and Nicolas Road as established in Table B - Cost Estimate Summary identified in the Arbor Vista Residential — Final Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures dated May 13, 2014. PW-30. Traffic Mitigation. Prior to the issuance of the 40th building permit, the Developer shall pay the amount established in Table B - Cost Estimate Summary identified in the Arbor Vista Residential — Final Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures dated May 13, 2014. PW-31. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City's General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve Nicolas Road (Modified Principal Arterial Standard No. 100 —110' R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, seven (7) foot wide planter area, five (5) food wide sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median. b. The developer shall start construction of the median per the approved plans or pay an "in-lieu of construction" fee for half width raised landscape median on Nicolas Road (Principal Arterial Standards — 110' R/W), from Via Lobo to the easterly property boundary. c. Improve Via Lobo Road from Nicolas Road to Station 90+52 to include a 44-foot wide dedication of the easterly half-width street right-of-way, installation of a twenty (20) foot wide half-width street improvements to include paving, curb and gutter; six (6) foot wide sidewalk, twelve (12) foot wide planter area, six (6) foot wide D.G. multipurpose trail, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). d. Improve Via Lobo Road from Station 90 + 52 to Station 89 + 76 to include a 44- foot wide dedication of the easterly half-width street right-of-way, installation of a twenty (20) foot wide half-width street improvements to include paving, curb and gutter; six (6) foot wide sidewalk, twelve (12)foot wide planter area, six (6)foot wide D.G. multipurpose trail, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW-32. Private Roads. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve "A", "B", "D", "E", and "C" Street east of "E" Street (Private Street - 41' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. b. Improve "C" Street west of "E" Street (Private Street - 37' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk, as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. c. Improve "C" Street at the main entry (Private Street — 81.5' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements and sidewalk as shown on the Tentative Tract Map. PW-33. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed utility lines, except electrical lines rated 34kV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider's standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. PW-34. Street Lights. The developer shall submit a completed SCE street light application, an approved SCE Streetlight Plan and pay the advanced energy fees. If not obtaining a building permit, this shall be done prior to installation of additional street lighting. All costs associated with the relocation of any existing street lights shall be paid by the developer. PW-35. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy PW-36. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all onsite work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. PW-37. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearances from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. PW-38. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. PW-39. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying satisfactory completion of all improvements per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer—of-record certifying the final compaction. PC RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FROM VL-VERY LOW DENSITY TO L- LOW DENSITY WITH A PDO FOR CLUSTERING AND OPEN SPACE; A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 ACRES INTO 83 LOTS; AND A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD" (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Applications and environmental review on May 21 , 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application with a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of Planning Application No.'s PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. A. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and associated applications, as described in the Initial Study ("the Project"). Based upon the findings contained in that study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. B. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration as required by law. The public comment period commenced on April 21, 2014, and expired on May 20, 2014. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. C. Four written comments were received prior to the public hearing and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. D. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. E. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this project. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of May, 2014. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FROM VL-VERY LOW DENSITY TO L- LOW DENSITY WITH A PDO FOR CLUSTERING AND OPEN SPACE; A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 ACRES INTO 83 LOTS; AND A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131 , General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). D. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. The Planning Commission reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the May 21, 2014 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. G. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for this Project. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Gwyn R. Flores, CMC, Acting City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. - was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Gwyn R. Flores, CMC Acting City Clerk City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: Arbor Vista Cluster Residential APPLICANT: Lenny Dunn, Regent Properties LOCATION: The project site is located on the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads, City of Temecula, Riverside County. (APNs 919-350-017, -018, -019, -020) DESCRIPTION: Planning Application No. PA12-0131, a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential. Planning Application No. PA12-0132, a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation with provisions for a cluster development. Planning Application No. PA12-0133, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 59% of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage onsite. Planning Application No. PA12-0134, a Residential Home Product Review application for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA10-0133) for 4 floor plans ranging in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types of each: Craftsman, Spanish, and Traditional. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described above. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study, and pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and will be included as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is April 21, 2014 to May 20, 2014. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: The Local Newspaper Posting the Site ['Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matt Peters, Associate Planner at (951) x4-6408. II Prepared by: , ,1 ' 50Gia1 ?Iconhe,n, n (Title)9 Lure) ( ) MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Initial Study& Environmental Analysis For: Arbor Vista Cluster Residential TTM No. 36479 PA 12-0131, 0132, and 0133 April 17, 2014 Prepared By: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 694-6400 iffir Community Development Department 9 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Environmental Checklist Project Title Arbor Vista Cluster Residential (TTM No. 36479) Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Contact Person and Phone Number Matt Peters (951)694-6408 matt.peters_pcityoftemecula.org Project Location The project site is located on the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads, City of Temecula, Riverside County. (APNs 919-350-017, -018, -019, -020) _ Project Sponsor's Name and Address Lenny Dunn, Regent Nicolas 73, LLC do Regent Properties 11990 San Vincente Boulevard, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90049 General Plan Designation VL- Very Low Density Residential Zoning VL-Very Low Density Residential Description of Project Planning Application No. PA12-0131, a General Plan Land Use Map change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential and (OS) Open Space. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APNs 919-350-017, -018, -019, -020). Planning Application No. PA 12-0132, a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Open Space (OS) and Low (L) density residential designations with provisions for a cluster development. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Planning Application No. PA 12-0133, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 39 acres will be permanently preserved as open space. Also, other portions of the site associated with the residential component result in another 4 acres, or approximately 59% of the site preserved as permanent open space. Environmental issues have been avoided by designing a compact development footprint, staying away from the existing drainage onsite, and designating the drainage and sensitive portions of the site as Open Space (OS). Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. The extent of this evaluation is overall implementation of the aforementioned entitlement applications, which include site preparation, grading operations, installation of required back-bone infrastructure such as; sewer, water and dry utilities, and construction of internal streets and necessary storm drain and water quality infrastructure. This evaluation also considered the design as relates to Metropolitan Water District, Southern California Gas Company and Southern California Edison Company easements. In addition, the project will include amenities to support the implementation of the development of 83 single family homes, such as a 6 acre park and associated parking lot, trails, gates, fences, walls, pilasters, and entry monuments. Improvements to Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads consistent with the City of Temecula's General Plan Circulation Element are also evaluated. Planning Application No. PA12-0134, a Residential Home Product Review application for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA10- 0133) for 4 floor plans ranging in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types of each: Craftsman, Spanish, and Traditional. The residential portion of this project is proposed to be gated. However, the residential area is designed to be surrounded by amenities that are open to the public, but privately maintained, including trails, a park with splash pad, and associated parking lot off of Nicolas Road. The Project site is located in the northwest corner of the City of Temecula referred to as the "Nicolas Valley." This area is in transition from a rural setting characterized by large lots, modest homes, horses, and dirt roads to a more suburban/urban setting as evidenced by two new churches, a Southern California Edison substation with nine new 100-foot high tension power line cables, and recently approved Walcott Estates consisting of 45 homes clustered on 22 acres. Furthermore, Roripaugh Ranch surrounds Nicolas Valley to the north and east and will contain approximately 2,000 units, a sports park, middle and elementary schools and a neighborhood commercial site. This area is under construction and includes improvements to Nicolas Road, which will further change the character of the Nicolas Valley. All utilities are underground and available to the site from Nicolas or Via Lobo Roads. Water is provided by Rancho California Water District (RCWD); sewer is provided by Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD); cable is provided by Time Warner Cable; telephone is provided by Verizon; gas is provided by Southern California Gas Company; and electricity is provided by Southern California Edison. The site is located within the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The subject property is a vacant hill with surrounding land, including an unnamed drainage. Properties to the north and west are developed at Low-Medium Density (LM). Directly south of the subject property is property developed at Very Low Density (VL), known as Meadowview. East of the subject property lies undeveloped land, zoned Very Low Density (VL). Other public agencies whose approval is required None Public Review Period From: April 21, 2014 To: May 20, 2014 2 ; _ (.1_,„7___ ; t_ j.- : f::: . 11-1 —1 I <\s\" - Al , _„,' ; f - ,,t. + '-1-" ri- \ i ' ' .. ' ' , JI __„.' I f f, 1 ri; 1 i - • rn _ !fi= _1 / P-1 - - --3.1 1 • _.. ei. PII•1 0 'Or ■ Z A CT 4 ._ - -- .------ PS-. --- etAe 6\ ' • - J - , - r 0 1 \ t.10R1.°G 69 , '• - ' co i I 1 P- I SO tsitovte ock / 1 oeskw‘ 3 , 0 0 , ,, \ • , tx v 0 0 ...G ? Project Site r 1. e) 0 1 r 2 r- 4 r.' rn PLO. X 0 r• o r t fn x 0 , 0 01, I , c 2. co r- P__ CT 7a -c 7 15 0 f- a seREN0 it•• 0,,.. F _,,,$) ee 4.1,0 lir r- r-i rn -st 0 NO' 4 0,„owe rb 4- I V, c it■13.-"--4r -9, Avel-0)1°`Es 40, _z ttAtii, A.. 2 44, 0 a ePscc'P'va cke z RU 4e1 It* > o 2so< 500 1 000 FSLIC"'14°159 1 Fete , 3 I ler_46.110.4.11 soiwilicLu, H ) ; i ww-001 or, v411 * --..--'-?;1:- : .: --5:: il il:::10Vitip _,, :* FliPr:, pl.'114141' ::" ,:i.,./ ...ii li el\ iliN 0 lit ei lis . vi -014 ., M .i' . - '- : ,c;t: 1 •• vs •• • _ , t ' - ,:i . ,. - - - 1. .1 its lot,J9,0 .4 . , fib •;0-0 ,0, , .. i 0111;41 . \ 1 1. _ . ., fioiect it,=, Ill ., • • is No -, . : -- .. VA vt - - ' ' . ' -- •: - ' 40.‘ , a sett ' -. -. L 'ff,;,.,,, , .. .71.4„. . 4A0: 1111 ' Itionlitt* ak oir Isoe I . . -.: . - N alb*, ri NSA* E, - - ' larits. / , A i / I_ 1. ii .. . kly , hir-vriovp„ ,•,,.., ' ''Aistliwie‘.-.-4 ..„,. 16110ffir A‘Irlib ,t-, . i ' . I' :- iraiena” 100147411111011 i Tit lian „_•=dfiniii.-wiiii 1011 A IP AM Akidlik iii• °Idris Mimi. -- _tp.raiii am= in Exhibit A: Site Plan m Z es., kN s V r `7i ac / o N f .W~., J O eIC Z 5 z Z O I s .... z O W O u Z W Z Z ¢ oQ�i ZZ J 2 S E Q Q OU + CJ' F H O J 3- z i U Z O �7'"i 0 m Q O r^ 1 i 1 # f/ /� 1 of r1 41 `r, - }' 1 s. �- I f Y.;1 , , ,/, ( i / w • i'',17:3,11,‘ d • TR`. yr 'T.,. `, `. _ti V . -� 1. "`iiv r :.L L �,, ` 1. �' f V 1 ,t�`Ah, t �n� JC1` ^ti /- .0 • '4,-•,. ... . .... r .,=. ....„,,„,, .. i, r .er YAK t��r`�'��^ i +��, a -:w And ' `' 'L .,` I �'� •s ti .1,, .q ,' s: ay 1F• .• % Ate 'ii a a; j v ti � y:.,, t _ ` �,; 3 1 EOM '- z r.� " g � _ F pz o a o U V Z �0- 7 N� Y Z < ,- 2 U J 2 Z Z 5 y Jo fi5 E �az U ce Zaz s � 3 19 E 7 E I- aa W5. Z UUE 3 ° o o 'w U 3z 3 °v. I- Z Z O a Wy I- 7�0 F � cy. _, W LI0 I- ZFlN F � g- Z O Qr V > WUV W a Z ZUV — w zz E4ce r lac a7,o � �° ., S2z W OZ Za 'i ZZ ,� Ems ° . Oza F, °` o oc �' c Oz' = " ° o vogZ =" z'z Eo W _ � z 0 LI-6 2OU> < E3 o vaac Ioa u Z -71—o 4EU > � � oaccO � — cci Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality None Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by X the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Fir 17.1°' (1/ Project Plann r: M t Pe -rs Date: • Armando G. Villa, AICP Date: Community Development Director 6 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated _ Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? s X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversel affect da or ni•httime views in the area? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 1.a. No Impact: There are no designated scenic vistas affected by the project. The Community Design Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic viewsheds to ensure that all new public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic resources. According to the exhibit on page CD-5 of the General Plan, the subject property has not been identified as a scenic vista or viewshed. No impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 1.b. No Impact: The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is a vacant hill and surrounding low-lying lands; however, no trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings will be affected by the proposed project. As addressed above in section 1.a. and according to the General Plan, the project site contains no scenic vistas or viewsheds. No impact is anticipated and no mitigation measures are required. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located on a vacant parcel composed of a small hill and the surrounding low-lying land on the southeast corner of Nicolas (4-lane major arterial) and Via Lobo (2-lane residential) Roads. Existing residential developments are located immediately north, south, and west of the project site. The project is part of a developing corridor and provides a transition between existing and future development by clustering development on approximately 23 acres and preserving 50 acres of open space. The open space will be adjacent to the existing residential dwellings to the south providing an adequate buffer between the existing and proposed development. The project will contain 83 single-family residential units consisting of three different floor plans and three different architectural styles, including Craftsman, Traditional, and Spanish. The homes will contain significant articulation and massing, varied rooflines, and architectural specific details and materials. The project also contains significant landscaping, trails, and rural, three-rail fencing with stone pilaster details. The project was designed to preserve open space and to complement surrounding residential development. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of the project. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project site is currently vacant with no sources of light or glare. Future development on the project site will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with residential development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). This requires all lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties, and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 7 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? _ X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(gr X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.citvoftemecula.orq. 2.a.c.d.e. No Impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the project site does not contain and will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use. Forest and/or Timberland do not exist on the property or in the surrounding area. Property to the north, south, and west all contain existing single-family dwellings, while the property to the east is a vacant lot. However the vacant property is zoned VL-Very Low Density Residential and is not intended for agricultural purposes. Therefore, the construction of the project will not have any impacts to these types of farmland or forest resources. 2.b. No Impact: The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula, and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act Contract. Consequently, there are no impacts related to this issue. 8 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X _ c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds_for ozone precursors)? X d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study was prepared by Entech Consulting Group for this project dated August 2013. The findings in this report were used to evaluate this section on Air Quality. A copy is available for review at City Hall, or can be provided by email. 3.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech Consulting Group (pages 34 and 35), "Based on the air quality emissions modeling contained in this report, with the implementation of identified mitigation measures, the air emissions associated with this proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance consistent with SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan." The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 3.c. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech Consulting Group, "The operational impact analysis is based on cumulative traffic conditions in the project area." As shown in that analysis, "The proposed project would not result in violations of the state or federal ambient air quality standards. The proposed project would be consistent with the SCAQMD's AQMP, which is the long range air quality planning document. Thus, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on cumulative regional and local air quality." Furthermore, it is stated, "After a detailed analysis, it has been determined that no significant impacts will be created from the construction and operation of the proposed project, thus no mitigation measures are required." The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, as defined in figure AQ-2 of the General Plan, there no known sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, libraries, child care centers, and adult-assisted care facilities) that would be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), however, classifies the surrounding residences as sensitive receptors. The surrounding residences may be exposed to some pollutant concentrations on a short-term basis during construction and grading activities. According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech Consulting Group (page 35), "After a detailed analysis, it has been determined that no significant impacts will be created from the construction and 9 operation of the proposed project, thus no mitigation measures are required." Furthermore, as indicated in Table 6 from the report, the project does not exceed peak day construction emissions. Table 6. Peak- Day Construction Emissions (lbs/day) by Construction Year Construction Year ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 2014 11 91 52 0.1 23 14 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Significance? no no no no no no - 2015 5 30 25 0.05 3 3 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceed Significance? no no no no no no 1 Source.(Entach Consulting Group,2{13) However, it is recommended that the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) be implemented as mitigation to minimize those emissions of PM10 and PM 2.5 during construction as a preventative measure. MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation Measure Air Quality 1: • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface of dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried ont the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials 3.e. Less Than Significant Impact: Development of the project will not create any considerably objectionable odors that will affect a substantial number of people in the surrounding community. In considering the scope of the project and the fact that construction activities will occur on a temporary basis, the impact is anticipated to be less than significant. 10 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project? Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b ' Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 4-- X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: A General Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis for the 73-acre Nicolas 73 Project Site by Cadre Environmental, and a Peer Review of the report by First Carbon Solutions July 2013 were used to complete the section on Biological Resources. Copies of both reports are available at City Hall for review, or by email. 4.a. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Implementation of the Project will not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Project site is vacant and previously disturbed. According to the General MSHCP Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis for the 73-acre Nicolas 73 Project Site by Cadre Environmental (pg.16), and a Peer Review of the report by First Carbon Solutions, no sensitive plant communities were documented on site. In addition, all direct and indirect impacts to MSHCP riparian/riverine resources including ephemeral wash, riparian scrub—sandbar willow, and southern willow scrub habitats have been avoided. 11 The analysis identified that no burrowing owl or characteristic sign were documented within or immediately adjacent to the project site. Regardless, at a minimum, a 30-day preconstruction survey is required prior to ground disturbance activities. MITIGATION MEASURES Bio 1: A qualified biologist shall survey the property for burrowing owls no more than 30 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 4.b. No Impact: Riparian/Riverine areas are lands which contain habitat dominated by trees, shrubs, persistent emergent vegetation, or emergent mosses and lichens, which occur close to, or which depend upon, soil moisture from a nearby fresh water source; or areas with fresh water flow during all or a portion of the year. Implementation of the Project will not have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service. According to the General MSHCP Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis, all Riparian/Riverine resources are avoided and no vernal pools exist on site, nor were any species associated with these habitats observed onsite. No impacts are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.c. No Impact The Project site does not contain federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. To be considered a wetland, a site must meet three criteria: hydric soils, wetland hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. Hydric soils are defined by the national Technical Committee as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the grow season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil. Wetland hydrology is present when, under normal circumstances, the land surface is either inundated or the upper portion of the soil is saturated at a sufficient frequency and duration to create anaerobic conditions. These conditions are also required in order for hydrophytic vegetation to be present. Implementation of the project will not have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. The project site is not characterized by any riparian habitat or wetland. No impacts are anticipated; therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.d. Less Than Significant Impact Because the project footprint does not directly impact riparian/riverine and vernal pool resources; does not occur within a predetermined survey for narrow endemic plant species, criteria area species, amphibian species or mammal species; and no burrowing owls or characteristics were found on site, a Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation process is not required. Impacts anticipated are less than significant, therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.e. No Impact The construction and development of the project will not conflict with any local ordinances or policies as they relate to the protection of biological resources. The City of Temecula has recently adopted a Heritage Tree Ordinance designed to protect certain species of trees within the City. However, no trees designated in the Ordinance were located on the subject property. The City of Temecula General Plan outlines a number of policies which emphasize the interrelationship between the built and natural environment. The General Plan recognizes the importance of conserving important biological habitat and protecting plant and animal species of concern. As a result, the General Plan requires that development proposals identify significant biological resources. The Biological Assessment that was completed for the proposed project site did not identify any sensitive plant species, sensitive bird species, sensitive mammal species, sensitive reptile or amphibian species on site. Additionally, a Burrowing Owl survey was completed to identify any potential habitat which would assess the likelihood that Burrowing Owls would utilize the property. No Burrowing Owls were found on-site. The Project will be conditioned for a 30-day pre-construction survey report prior to grading. As a result, no impacts will occur. 4.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed development of the project will not conflict with the provisions of the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP). The MSHCP is a comprehensive, multi- 12 jurisdictional plan which focuses on the conservation of 146 species and their associated habitats in Western Riverside County. The Plan's overall goal is to maintain a biological and ecological diversity within the rapidly urbanizing area. The Plan Area encompasses approximately 1.26 million acres and includes the City of Temecula within its boundaries. The following excerpt is taken directly from the General MSHCP Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis for this project. As a result, impacts are considered less than significant. SUMMARY OF CONSISTENCY WITH MSHCP POLICIES Criteria Areas The Project Site is located within the Western Riverside County MSHCP Southwest Area Plans outside of a Criteria Area or Subunit. Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area The Project Site is not within the Narrow Endemic Plant Species Survey Area; therefore, no surveys were required. Criteria Area Species Survey Area The Project Site is not within the Criteria Area Species Survey Area; therefore, no surveys were required. Amphibian Species Survey Area The Project Site is not within the Amphibian Species Survey Area; therefore, no surveys were required. Mammal Species Survey Area The Project Site is not within the Mammal Species Survey Area; therefore, no surveys were required. Burrowing Owl Survey Area The Project Site is within the Burrowing Owl Survey Area. Focused surveys are currently being conducted based on the MSHCP and CDFG Staff Report protocol guidelines. Mitigation and avoidance measures as outlined in the MSHCP will be implemented based on the results of the survey, as warranted. As stated in the MSHCP: "If the site (including adjacent areas) support three or more pairs of burrowing owls and supports greater than 35 acres of suitable habitat and is non-contiguous with MSHCP Conservation Area lands, at least 90 percent of the area with long-term conservation value and burrowing owl pairs will be conserved onsite." (MSHCP 2004) Riparian/Riverine Areas And Vernal Pools As previously presented, the Project Site supports areas that meet the MSHCP definition of riparian and riverine resources. The Project Site does not support vernal pool resources. All direct impacts to MSHCP riparian/riverine resources will be avoided. 13 Urban/Wildlands Interface The guidelines pertaining to the Urban/Wildlands Interface guidelines presented in Section 6.1.4 of the MSHCP are intended to address indirect effects associated with locating developments in proximity to a MSHCP Conservation Area. Although the proposed open space located south of the development impact area is not a MSHCP Conservation Area, the project design features and best management practices incorporated into the proposed project address and minimize edge effects associated with the Urban/Wildlife interface. Fuels Management The fuels management guidelines presented in Section 6.4 of the MSHCP are intended to address brush management activities around new development within or adjacent to the MSHCP Conservation Area. Although the proposed open space located south of the development impact area is not a MSHCP Conservation Area, no fuel medication will extend into the open space or impact MSHCP riparian/riverine resources. 14 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? - X c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: A Cultural and Paleontological Resources Survey Report for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential Project was prepared by Dudek, dated August 2013, and used to evaluate this section on Cultural Resources. A copy is available for review at City Hall, or can be provided by email. 5.a—d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The City of Temecula General Plan does not identify the subject parcel as a sensitive archeological resource area; however, the subject parcel is identified as being in a highly sensitive paleontological area. A cultural resources report on the subject property was provided by the applicant entitled, "A Cultural and Paleontological Resources Survey Report for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential Project" prepared by Dudek. The report concluded that no cultural or paleontological resources in the project area were found within the subject property boundaries, but recommended if any remains were exposed during development; the area should be re-evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. While the likelihood of encountering any cultural resources is low, there is potential, as with any project involving earth moving activities, to uncover unknown subsurface cultural resources. Therefore, the project will be conditioned that if, during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. In addition, consultation with the Pechanga Tribe has occurred and the following mitigation measures have been provided (letter dated October 15, 2013), and are incorporated below: MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation Measure CultRes 1: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction; the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure CultRes 3: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre-grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation, which will be determined in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include 15 the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in Mitigation Measure CultRes 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal and archeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. Mitigation Measure CultRes 4: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CultRes 2. Mitigation Measure CultRes 5: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure CultRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Director of Community Development shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Director of Community Development shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 16 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: - X i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X Comments: A Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing Report for Nicolas 73 were prepared by Geocon West, Inc. for this project, dated March 28, 2012. The findings in this report were used to evaluate this section on Geology and Soils. A copy is available for review at City Hall, or can be provided by email. 6.a.i.ii.iii.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The subject property is not located on a fault line or fault zone. On page 4, under Section 5, Geologic Hazards, it is reported that, "The site is not within a currently established Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone for surface fault rupture hazards. Nor is it within a Riverside County Fault Hazard Zone. We did not find evidence indicating active faulting on or projecting toward the site from adjacent properties." Soil liquefaction is caused by the loss of soil strength, which is the result of increased pore water pressures related to significant seismic activity. This phenomenon occurs primarily in loose to somewhat dense cohesion-less soils, which are located within a groundwater zone. When seismic shaking occurs a rearrangement of the soil particles takes place, putting them into a denser condition, which results in the localized sediment, sand boils and/or flow failures. The subject property is located in a seismically active area, as is the majority of Southern California. Various portions of the subject property are designated very low or moderate by Riverside County for liquefaction. As indicated in the report on page 7, "Due to the depth of the water table, it is our opinion that the potential for liquefaction at this site is very low." The project has been reviewed and conditioned by Building and Safety to be constructed compliance with the California Building Code (CBC). Furthermore, the project will be conditioned to provide the following, "A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections." As a result, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project. 17 6.a.iv. Less Than Significant Impact: Landslide hazard areas are generally considered to exist when substantial slopes are located on or immediately adjacent to a subject property. There are slopes located on the project site, but none that could potentially create a hazard associated with landslides. The potential for landslides to occur at the site is considered less than significant. 6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The site may be susceptible to soil erosion during short-term construction activities. Short-term erosion effects during the construction phase of the project would be prevented through implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is required in accordance with the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Activities Permit. The SWPPP includes standard construction methods such as sandbags, silt fencing, and temporary detention basins to control on-site and off-site erosion. Therefore, with implementation of an approved and required SWPPP, impacts resulting from erosion during construction would be less than significant. 6.e. No Impact: The project will be connected to sewer service and will not require the use of septic tanks. No impacts are anticipated. 18 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact_ a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? _ X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse __gases? _ X Comments: An Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study was prepared by Entech Consulting Group for this project in August 2013. The findings in this report were used to evaluate this section on Air Quality. A copy is available for review at City Hall, or can be provided by email. 7.a.b. Less than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Entech, the GHG emissions as identified in the CaIEEMod run for the Project would not exceed SCAQMD average daily thresholds. Also, identified in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Entech (page 28), the project is consistent with all applicable plans, policies and strategies for reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases and the Project would result in a less than significant impact. The project's estimated 32 MT of CO2e construction emissions and 1,333 MT of CO2e operational GHG emissions do not exceed the draft SCAQMD threshold for all land uses (3,000 MT of CO2e) or the more specific draft SCAQMD threshold for residential uses (3,500 MT of CO2e), and is consistent with the goals of the City of Temecula Sustainability Plan. As discussed in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Entech, while the SCAQMD thresholds have not been formally adopted, there are no other state, regional, or local greenhouse gas thresholds approved for use in in the South Coast Air Basin and the City has discretion to determine the method or methodology it considers the most appropriate for evaluating significant impacts. Based on the foregoing analysis, although the project would generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, these emissions would not have a significant impact on the environment. Please see applicable sections regarding greenhouse gas emissions from the Entech report, which are included on the following pages: 19 Table 8. Maximum Predicted CO Concentrations' 2016 2035 Intersection Existing No Build Build No Build Build 1-hour CO Concentrations Federal Standards-35 ppm,State Standards-20 ppm Winchester Road/Margarita Road 5.2 5.6 5.6 6.0 6.0 Winchester Road/Nicolas Road 5.5 5.9 5.9 6.6 6.6 8-hour CO Concentrations Federal and State Standard-9 ppm Winchester Road/Margarita Road 3.6 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.2 Winchester Road/Nicolas Road 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.6 4.6 Notes: (1)All concentrations shown are in parts per million(ppm) Source: Entech Consulting Group,2013 Results from the CO hot-spot modeling analysis demonstrate that for the highest volume and LOS intersections, future predicted CO concentrations are slightly higher than existing levels due to an increase in future traffic. Further. the comparison between future no-build and the build alternative CO concentrations indicate that CO concentrations are expected to remain unchanged. The addition of the 83 single family residences will have a minimal effect on future traffic within the proposed project area. Therefore. the proposed project will not worsen ambient air quality, create additional violations of federal and state standards, or delay the basin's goal for meeting attainment standards. Draft guidance from both the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SC AQMD) and the County of San Diego Department of Planning and. Land Use recommend amortizing chi€ n emissions over a 30-year period to account for their contribution to project lifetime greenhouse gai emissions. If emissions are amortized over a 30-year period, estimated construction emissions would be 32 MT of CO2e per year, as shown in Table 9. Estimate operational emissions for the proposed project would be 1,333 MT of CO2e per year_ as shown in Table 10. As shown in Table 11, the total greenhouse gas ealziss�ions from both construction and operation are approximately 1,365 MT of CO2e per year. which is below the 1500 MT threshold for residential land uses as a screening 20 threshold. Construction and operation enissions would therefore have a less than cumulatively contribution to global climate change impacts. Table 9. CO;eEmissions by Construction Year CO2e Emissions Construction Year (metric tans±year) 2014 450 2015 511 Tata CGS Emissions 961 Amortized over 30 years 32 Source_(Ertech Consulting Group_ 2013) Table 10. Operational COie Emissions Somme cO:e Emissions (metric tons year) Area 03 Energy 181 Mobile 1.040 Waste 44 Water 5 Total Operational 1,333 COie Emissions Sct.r:e ,E-ect1 cc rp ulh.^. '_11: Table 11. Annual C O e Einii'sious Source CO!e Emissions imetric tons,'year) Construction 32 Operational 1.333 Total Proposed Project 1,365 CO re Emissions Site 1E' ech Consultrig Group,2013) 21 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact_ Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X Comments: The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), File Number ZAP105FV13. A copy of the letter from the Airport Land Use Commission is available for review at City Hall or by email. 8.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not create significant impact to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed land use is a residential development, which will not be routinely transporting, using, or disposing hazardous materials. 8.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accidental conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project is a residential development and will not emit hazardous materials into the environment. In addition, the project will not require the handling of hazardous waste or accurately hazardous materials, substances, and waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or a proposed school. 8.d. No Impact: The proposed project will not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant 22 hazard to the public or the environment. The California Environmental Protection Agency lists Hazardous Waste Substances Sites. The project site is not on the list, therefore no impact related to hazardous materials posing a significant hazard to the public or the environment will occur. 8.e. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), File Number ZAP105FV13. As a result, the following conditions were provided, and are incorporated herein as mitigation: MITIGATION MEASURES Mitigation Measure Hazards 1: Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. Mitigation Measure Hazards 2: The following uses shall be prohibited: a. Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. b. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. c. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor, or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area, including landscaping utilizing water features, trash transfer stations that are open on one or more sides, recycling centers containing putrescible wastes, construction and demolition debris facilities, and incinerators. d. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Mitigation Measure Hazards 3: A Notice of Airport Vicinity shall be provided to all potential purchasers and/or tenants of the proposed residences. Mitigation Measure Hazards 4: Any new retention bases on the site shall be designed so as to provide for a maximum 48-hour detention period following the conclusion of the storm event for the design storm (may be less, but not more), and to remain totally dry between rainfalls. Vegetation in and around the retention basin(s) that would provide food or cover for bird species that would be incompatible with airport operations shall not be utilized in project landscaping. 8.f. No Impact: The project site is not located in the vicinity of a public airstrip. The project will not create or result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact is anticipated. 8.g. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area where it will impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project has been reviewed by the Fire Department, and is not adjacent to a wildland area that would be subject to fire hazards. Future development will comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 23 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Iact Incorporated Impact Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? X d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f Require the preparation of a project-specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 1 X Comments: A Hydrology Analysis and Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan were prepared for this project by Hunsaker and Associates, August 2013. A copy of both reports are available for review at City Hall, or can be provided by email. In addition, a Jurisdictional Delineation & Riparian and Riverine Assessment was prepared by Cadre Environmental, March 2012. A copy of this report is also available at City Hall, or can be provided by email. 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The project is required to comply with all current soil erosion and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System standards in effect at time of grading permit issuance. As a condition of approval for this project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Quality Resources Control Board. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 24 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or lowering of the local groundwater table level because the project design preserves approximately 50 acres of open space containing the lowest elevations of the property, which will allow for groundwater re-charging. A less than significant impact is anticipated. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: A Jurisdictional Delineation & Riparian and Riverine Assessment was prepared by Cadre Environmental, March 2012 and used to design the project footprint to completely avoid the existing drainage pattern of the site or area. The low lying areas of the site will remain undisturbed and preserved as permanent open space. In addition, through the implementation of SWPPP (Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program), erosion and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant impact level and this project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site. 9.d.e.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will increase runoff as a result of increasing the impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard design criteria to detain surface runoff on the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased. The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the state of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm-Sewer Permit (MS4 Permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). A preliminary plan has been submitted and conceptually accepted and the project will comply with RWQCB standards and design. Based upon the information presented above, the project will not increase the amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. 9.g.h. No Impact: According to the City's General Plan, the project will not involve the placement of residences or structures within a 100-year floodplain hazard area. The project is not within an area identified on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps for flooding. No significant flood hazards are expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed, therefore no impact is anticipated. 9.i. No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The subject property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. No impacts are anticipated. 9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and higher elevation, there is no potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface body of water, and there is no potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow due to the topography of the site. 25 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? _ X c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X natural community conservation plan? Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.citvoftemecula.orq. 10.a. No Impact: The project is located on vacant land that will not divide an established community. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 83 new single family homes on 73 acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO- Planned Development Overlay. The proposed development is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition between high and low density. Roads and other infrastructure are available to the site and the site will not require major extensions of infrastructure that could induce substantial population growth within the area, which may have a significant environmental impact. Using the City's General Plan, Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), Land Use Policy Map, and MSHCP guidelines as reference sources the project does not interfere with any applicable environmental policies or ordinances. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the project. 10.c. No Impact: The project is consistent with the MSHCP and will not conflict with any habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan (see discussion under"Biological Resources"). 26 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? ( X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local •eneral 'Ian, s•ecific 'Ian or other land use 'Ian? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.citvoftemecula.org. 11.a.b. No Impact: The construction of this project on the proposed site is not anticipated to result in the loss of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California Special Report 165, which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the Temecula Planning Area was classified as a Mineral Resources Zone-3a (MRZ-3a), which determined that the area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential for supplying sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate; however, these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of significant economic value. The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to contain mineral resources. No impacts are anticipated as result of this project. 27 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X Comments: A Noise Impact Analysis for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential project was prepared by Entech Consulting, August 2013 and used to complete this section on noise impacts. A copy of the report is available for review at City Hall or by email. 12.a. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: A Noise Study was prepared Entech and analyzed ambient noise levels in comparison to estimated noise levels during construction and after the Project is built(operational noise). Consideration was given to the City's Noise Ordinance and Maximum Noise Levels (Ldn, or CNEL, dBA). The report concluded that there would be temporary impacts during construction. In order to mitigate these impacts to meet the exterior noise standards, the following mitigations are required: MITIGATION MEASURES Noise 1: During all project site excavation and onsite grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. All heavy construction equipment used on the project site shall be maintained in good operating condition, with all internal combustion, engine-drive equipment equipped with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition. "Quiet" models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be utilized where such technology exists. Noise 2: The construction contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Noise 3: The construction contractors shall also locate equipment staging in areas as far away as possible distance from noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 28 Noise 4: The construction contractors shall post signs prohibiting unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. The contractors shall further designate a "noise disturbance coordinator' who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaints (e.g. beginning work too early, bad muffler) and institute reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem. Noise 5: A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator would be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Noise 6: During all project construction, the construction contractors shall limit all noise-producing construction related activities to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays. All noise-producing construction activity shall be completely restricted on all Sundays and City- observed holidays. Noise 7: The project applicant shall obtain a construction related exception from the City in order to exempt the temporary construction noise activities from the noise ordinance requirements, specifically for proposed onsite uses. Noise 8: For operational impacts, HVAC and other noise producing mechanical systems for the proposed project — such systems must be enclosed and located so as to not exceed the City's standard of a maximum permitted noise level of 50dBA at any point on a neighboring property line. After these mitigation measures are incorporated, construction noise impacts will be considered less than significant. 12.b. Less Than Significant Impact: Residential development is adjacent to the project site on the north and therefore, there are persons that may be exposed to groundborne vibration or noise. This impact would occur during the site grading phase of the project. It should be noted that this impact will be considered less than significant as the project footprint has been limited to less than 50 percent of the project site, north of the jurisdictional delineation to minimize grading. In addition, people working near the heavy equipment will be exposed to high noise levels for short periods of time. This level, however, is below the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) noise exposure limit of 90 dBA for 8 hours per day. The Developer and its private contractors are required to comply with OSHA requirements for employee protection during construction. Impacts are considered less than significant; therefore, no additional mitigation measures are required. 12.c. Less Than Significant Impact: For reasons described above, the proposed project will not result in substantial increases in ambient noise levels above levels existing without the project. Any noises generated by the Project will be less than the roadway noise generated primarily from Nicolas Road. Impacts, while incremental, are considered less than significant. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures are required. 12.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will result in a temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the project, but impacts will be considered less than significant. Please reference Response No. 12.b. No additional mitigation is required. 12.e. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), File Number ZAP105FV13. As a result, conditions were provided and included as mitigation under the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the Initial Study. 29 12.f. No Impact The Project site is not located near any private airstrip. There is no potential for the Project to expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels relating to a private airstrip. No mitigation measures are required. 30 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No _ Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orct. The project site is located in the northwest corner of the City of Temecula referred to as the "Nicolas Valley." This area is in transition from a rural setting characterized by large lots, mostly modest homes, horses, and dirt roads to a more suburban/urban setting as evidenced by two new churches, a Southern California Edison substation with nine new 100' foot high tension power line cables, and recently approved Walcott Estates consisting of 45 homes clustered on 22 acres. Furthermore, Roripaugh Ranch surrounds Nicolas Valley to the north and east and will contain approximately 2,000 units, a sports park, middle and elementary schools and a neighborhood commercial site. This area is under construction and includes improvements to Nicolas Road, which will further change the character of the Nicolas Valley. 13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 83 new single- family homes on 73 acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO — Planned Development Overlay. The net increase resulting from the zone change from VL —Very Low Density Residential to L — Low Density Residential is 47 units, which is not considered substantial as evidenced by the results of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project, which identified right-turn overlap phasing and fair share contributions to mitigate impacts to Level of Service (LOS) to acceptable levels at five intersections. The property is already zoned VL and was previously planned for residential development. The proposed project is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition between existing and proposed residential development. The project has residential development to the south and major roads on two sides (Nicolas Road to the north and Via Lobo Road to the west) of the property. Roads and other infrastructure are available to the site and the project will not require major extensions of infrastructure that could induce substantial population growth in the area. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of this project. 13.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project site is currently vacant and will not displace housing or people necessitating the need for replacement housing elsewhere. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 31 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Less Than ' Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? X Police protection? X Schools? X Parks? X Other public facilities? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 14.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will add a total of 83 single-family residences to the community that will have a very minor (less than significant) impact upon, or result in a new or altered fire, police, school, recreation, or other public facilities. Development of this site was previously analyzed by and anticipated in the Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from VL-Very Low Density to L-Low Density will incrementally increase the need for some public services. However, this increase can be addressed when the project is required to contribute its fair share to public services through the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF). In addition, the project was reviewed and conditioned by the Police and Fire Departments in order to ensure adequate facilities, acceptable service ratios, and response times. A significant portion of the project (approximately 50 acres) will be preserved as open space, and will contain trails that can provide linkage to existing and future development in the area. A portion of the open space along Nicolas Road will contain a park with splash pad, which will be open to the public, but privately maintained by the HOA. The incremental effects on schools will be reduced through the payment of applicable school fees at the time the project is developed. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of this project. 32 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact G a Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.org. 15.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will have a less than significant impact on the existing recreational opportunities and existing parks since the proposed project will create approximately 50 acres of open space and provide trails that will link to future and existing development. In addition, a portion of the open space along Nicolas Road will contain a park with splash pad, which will be open to the public, but privately maintained by the HOA. Also, the City owns and maintains 39 parks, and has two recreation centers, an outdoor amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum, and Children's Museum. The proposed development may slightly increase the use of the existing parks or other recreational facilities in the area; however the demand will not increase significantly as a result of the project. The proposed project would not directly increase or result in the substantial deterioration of the existing park and recreational facilities. It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a less than significant impact. 15.b. No Impact: The project includes the preservation of approximately 50 acres of open space and provides trails that will create links to future and existing development. The project will also contain a privately maintained public park along Nicolas Road. In addition, the preservation of open space will ensure that the project will not have an adverse physical effect on the environment. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 33 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? X b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X Comments: A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential project was prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers, (LLG), February 5, 2014. The results and conclusions contained in this report were used to complete this section on Transportation/Traffic. A copy is available for review at City Hall, or by email. 16.a.b. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: According to the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers, (LLG), the proposed project is located on Nicolas Road and Via Lobo Road. The project consists of 83 single-family residences and a park along Nicolas Road. The project is expected to generate approximately 795 vehicle trips per day with 64 AM peak hour trips and 85 PM peak hour trips. The TIA document, which was reviewed by Willdan Engineering and City Staff, evaluated Level of Service (LOS) at the following 9 intersections deemed to be within the project's study area: • Winchester Road at Margarita Road • Winchester Road at Roripaugh Road • Winchester Road at Nicolas Road • Nicolas Road at Rancho Temecula Town Center • Nicolas Road at North General Kearny Road • Nicolas Road at Via Lobo Road • Nicolas Road at Joseph Road • Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa • Nicolas Road at Butterfield Stage Road 34 The LOS analysis indicates that the majority of study intersections currently operate at LOS "D" or better with the exception of Winchester Road at Nicolas Road which operates at LOS "F". With the addition of project traffic, under Existing plus Project Conditions, the majority of intersections will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service with the exception of Winchester Road at Nicolas Road, which exceeds the significance threshold for delay during the PM peak hour. The delay is considered significant and the project will be required to provide the following improvements to mitigate the LOS to acceptable levels: • Provide right-turn overlap phasing for northbound Winchester Road and westbound Nicolas Road. The analysis indicates that under Cumulative and General Plan Buildout Conditions the study intersections will continue to operate at LOS "D" or better with the exception of the following: • Winchester Road at Margarita Road (PM Peak) • Winchester Road at Nicolas Road (AM and PM Peak) • Nicolas Road at Joseph Road (AM and PM Peak) • Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa (AM and PM Peak) • Nicolas Road at Rancho Temecula Town Center The project will be required to provide its fair share contribution for the implementation of improvements identified in the TIA document that would mitigate all of the intersection LOS to acceptable levels. The fair share costs associated with implementation of the mitigation measures shall be based on the cost estimates provided by LLG under a separate document. The cost estimates and timing for funding shall be included in the project's Conditions of Approval. The City finds that the improvements are feasible and are also included in programs that ensure funding and construction. MITIGATION MEASURES To summarize, the following mitigation measures required to mitigate impacts to less than significant: Traffic 1: Provide right-turn overlap phasing for northbound Winchester Road and westbound Nicolas Road. Traffic 2: The project will be required to provide its fair share contribution for the implementation of improvements required to mitigate intersection LOS to acceptable levels at Winchester and Margarita Roads; Winchester and Nicolas Roads; Nicolas Road at Joseph Road; Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa; and Nicolas Road at Rancho Temecula Town Center. 16.c. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), File Number ZAP105FV13. As a result, conditions were provided and included as mitigation under the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the Initial Study. 16.d.e.f. No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The Project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed Project provides for adequate ingress and egress from the site. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed and conditioned the project to address safety and on-site circulation. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 35 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b 1 Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? X f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.org. 17.a.b.d.e. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not exceed applicable wastewater treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was submitted for the project to meet all Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. The Rancho California Water District and Eastern Municipal Water District reviewed the proposal and indicated that potable water and sanitary sewer are available in this area. The project is anticipated to have less than significant impact. 17.c. Less Than Significant Impact: It is not anticipated that the project will create a significant amount of storm water runoff to require or result in the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared and has been conceptually accepted and conditioned for approval by the City's WQMP Engineer. The project is anticipated to have less than significant impact. 17.f.g. Less than Significant Impact: The project will be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs. Any potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 36 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a 1. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X Comments: The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.citvoftemecula.org. 18.a Less Than Significant Impact: Based on evaluations and discussions contained in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, the proposed residential project will have limited potential to degrade the quality of the environment. This is an in-fill development in the Nicolas Valley, and it does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The effects from this project are less than significant from a cumulative impact perspective. None of the impacts associated with the project will be considerable when viewed in connection with the effect of the past projects, current projects and future projects. Less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. 18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The Project will be designed and developed consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. No substantial environmental effects that would cause adverse effects on human beings have been identified 37 19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. a Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review. b Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 19.a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report, and the City of Temecula's Geographic Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a reference source in preparing the Initial Study for this project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for eview at the City of Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street. The GIS Map Sets are available online at www.cityoftemecula.orq. 19.b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis. 19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program. PERSONS CONSULTED 1. Armando G. Villa, AICP, Community Development Director 2. Stuart Fisk, AICP, Senior Planner 3. Matt Peters, AICP, Associate Planner 4. Tom Garcia, Director of Public Works 5. Annie Bostre Le, Special Projects Engineer, Public Works 6. Jerry Gonzalez, Traffic Engineer, Public Works 7. Elsa Wigle, Fire Department SOURCES* 1. City of Temecula General Plan 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. Geotechnical Investigation and Percolation Testing Report for Nicolas 73 was prepared by Geocon West, Inc. for this project dated March 28, 2012. 5. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study was prepared by Entech Consulting Group for this project dated August 2013. 6. Cultural and Paleontological Resources Survey Report for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential Project was prepared by Dudek, dated August 2013. 7. The project site is located in the vicinity of the French Valley Airport and has been reviewed by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC), File Number ZAP105FV13. 38 8. A Hydrology Analysis and Project Specific Water Quality Managemetn Plan were prepared for ehis project by Hunsaker and Associates, August 2013. 9. Jurisdictional Delineation & Riparian and Riverine Assessment was prepared by Cadre Environmental, March 2012 10. Traffic Impact Analysis for the Arbor Vista Cluster Residential project was prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan Engineers, (LLG), February 5, 2014 11. General MSHCP Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis for the 73-acre Nicolas 73 Project Site by Cadre Environmental, January 2013 12. Peer Review of General MSHCP Habitat Assessment and Regulatory Constraints Analysis for the 73- acre Nicolas 73 Project Site by Cadre Environmental by First Carbon Solutions July 2013 • Sources are available on line at www.cityoftemecula.org 39 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ii Mitigation Monitoring Program Project Description: Planning Application No. PA12-0131, a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Low (L) Density Residential. Project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APNs 919-350- 017, -018, -019, -020). Planning Application No. PA 12-0132, a Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) Density Residential to Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation with provisions for a cluster development. Planning Application No. PA 12-0133, a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivided 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 59% of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage onsite. Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. Planning Application No. PA12-0134, a Residential Home Product Review application for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA10-0133) for 4 floor plans ranging in size from 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types of each: Craftsman, Spanish, and Traditional. The residential portion of this project is proposed to be gated. However, the residential area is designed to be surrounded by amenities that are open to the public, but privately maintained, including trails, a park with splash pad, and associated parking lot off of Nicolas Road. Location: The project site is located on the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads, City of Temecula, Riverside County. (APNs 919-350-017, -018, -019, -020) Applicant: Lenny Dunn, Regent Properties 11990 San Vincente Boulevard, Suite 200 Los Angeles, CA 90049 Air Quality The project has the potential to impact air quality unless the following mitigation measures are included: Mitigation Measure Air Quality 1: • Minimize land disturbances • Utilize watering trucks to minimize dust • Cover trucks when hauling dirt • Put grading and earth moving on hold when wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour unless the soil is wet enough to prevent dispersion • Stabilize the surface of dirt piles if they are not removed immediately • Sweep nearby paved streets at least once per day if there is evidence of dirt that has been carried onto the roadway • Revegetate disturbed land as soon as possible • Remove unused materials Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the Project to reduce air quality impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to grading permit. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. Cultural Resources The project has the potential to impact cultural resources unless the following mitigation measures are included: Mitigation Measure CultRes 1: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction; the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. Mitigation Measure CultRes 3: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre-grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation, which will be determined in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in Mitigation Measure CultRes 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal and archeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. Mitigation Measure CultRes 4: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in Mitigation Measure CultRes 2. 2 Mitigation Measure CultRes 5: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. Mitigation Measure CultRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Director of Community Development shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Director of Community Development shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council. Mitigation Milestone: Agreements and conditions prior to issuance of a grading permit, monitoring ongoing through grading operations, and final reports upon completion of grading. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. Noise The project has the potential to have noise impacts unless the following mitigation measures are included: Noise 1: During all project site excavation and onsite grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with manufacturers' standards. All heavy construction equipment used on the project site shall be maintained in good operating condition, with all internal combustion, engine-drive equipment equipped with intake and exhaust mufflers that are in good condition. "Quiet" models of air compressors and other stationary noise sources shall be utilized where such technology exists. Noise 2: The construction contractors shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. Noise 3: The construction contractors shall also locate equipment staging in areas as far away as possible distance from noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Noise 4: The construction contractors shall post signs prohibiting unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines. The contractors shall further designate a "noise disturbance coordinator" who would be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The disturbance coordinator would determine the cause of the noise complaints (e.g. beginning work too early, bad muffler) and institute reasonable measures warranted to correct the problem. 3 Noise 5: A telephone number for the disturbance coordinator would be conspicuously posted at the construction site. Noise 6: During all project construction, the construction contractors shall limit all noise- producing construction related activities to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturdays. All noise-producing construction activity shall be completely restricted on all Sundays and City-observed holidays. Noise 7: The project applicant shall obtain a construction related exception from the City in order to exempt the temporary construction noise activities from the noise ordinance requirements, specifically for proposed onsite uses. Noise 8: For operational impacts, HVAC and other noise producing mechanical systems for the proposed project — such systems must be enclosed and located so as to not exceed the City's standard of a maximum permitted noise level of 50dBA at any point on a neighboring property line. Specific Process: Place the above Mitigation Measures as Conditions of Approval on the project to reduce potential noise impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Milestone: Grading permit issuance and building permit issuance. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. Biological Resources The project has the potential to impact biological resources unless the following mitigation measures are included: Bio 1: A qualified biologist shall survey the property for burrowing owls no more than 30 days prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Mitigation Milestone: Agreements and conditions prior to issuance of a grading permit, monitoring ongoing through grading operations, and final reports upon completion of grading. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The project has the potential to impact Hazards and Hazardous Materials as relates to the French Valley Airport unless the following mitigation measures are included: Mitigation Measure Hazards 1: Any outdoor lighting that is installed shall be hooded or shielded so as to prevent either the spillage of lumens or reflection into the sky. Mitigation Measure Hazards 2: The following uses shall be prohibited 4 a. Any use which would direct a steady light or flashing light of red, white, green or amber colors associated with airport operations toward an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or toward an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach toward a landing at an airport, other than an FAA-approved navigational signal light or visual approach slope indicator. b. Any use which would cause sunlight to be reflected towards an aircraft engaged in an initial straight climb following takeoff or towards an aircraft engaged in a straight final approach towards a landing at an airport. c. Any use which would generate smoke or water vapor, or which would attract large concentrations of birds, or which may otherwise affect safe air navigation within the area, including landscaping utilizing water features, trash transfer stations that are open on one or more sides, recycling centers containing putrescible wastes, construction and demolition debris facilities, and incinerators. d. Any use which would generate electrical interference that may be detrimental to the operation of aircraft and/or aircraft instrumentation. Mitigation Measure Hazards 3: A Notice of Airport Vicinity shall be provided to all potential purchasers and/or tenants of the proposed residences. Mitigation Measure Hazards 4: Any new retention bases on the site shall be designed so as to provide for a maximum 48-hour detention period following the conclusion of the storm event for the design storm (may be less, but not more), and to remain totally dry between rainfalls. Vegetation in and around the retention basin(s) that would provide food or cover for bird species that would be incompatible with airport operations shall not be utilized in project landscaping. Mitigation Milestone: Incorporation into CC&Rs prior to approval of Final Map. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. Transportation/Traffic The project has the potential to impact traffic unless the following mitigation measures are included: Traffic 1: Provide right-turn overlap phasing for northbound Winchester Road and westbound Nicolas Road. Traffic 2: The project will be required to provide its fair share contribution for the implementation of improvements required to mitigate intersection LOS to acceptable levels at Winchester and Margarita Roads; Winchester and Nicolas Roads; Nicolas Road at Joseph Road; Nicolas Road at Calle Medusa; and Nicolas Road at Rancho Temecula Town Center. Mitigation Milestone: Prior to Grading Permit and Prior to Final Map Approval. Responsible Monitoring Party: Planning Division and Public Works Department. 5 eadowview Community Association October 8,2013 City Council and City Planning Commission City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 RE: SUPPORT OF REGENT PROPERTIES' ARBOR VISTA PROJECT Dear Honorable Members of the City Council and Planning Commission: On behalf of the Meadowview Community Association, and based on the details described below, we offer this letter in support of Regent Properties' proposed Arbor Vista project at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads in the City of Temecula immediately adjacent to Meadowview(the"Project"). First of all, we would like to commend Regent for its outstanding outreach efforts with regard to the Project. Over the last year,Regent has attended several meetings with our Association Board as well as Association Membership to explain the Project and address our residents' questions. We are appreciative of the open dialogue we have with the Regent team and their willingness to listen to our thoughts and present constructive solutions to our concerns. As we understand it, the Project will result in 83 single family homes with an overall density under 1.5 units per acre. The average lot size is approximately 8,000 square feet and the lots are clustered towards the north of the property so that 59%of the property(approximately 43.2 acres predominately in the southern portion of the property) will perpetually remain undeveloped open space and provide a meaningful buffer between the Project and Meadowview. In addition, the Project will provide valuable park, trail and monumentation amenities for its own residents as well as the community at large. We believe the Project is a well thought through plan that sensitively respects adjacent uses and will be a benefit for the City. Therefore, we request your approval of the Project as described above. Sincerely, * -7/// Mark Kramer,President Meadowview Community Association cc: City Planning Department 41050 Avenida Verde • Temecula,CA 92591 • 951-676-4429 • Fax 951-695-2409 U tt...z John T. And Deborah A. Parnakian 40224 Paseo Sereno Temecula, Ca 92591-1631 dparnakian @yahoo.com September 20, 2013 City Council and City Planning Commission City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 RE: SUPPORT OF REGENT PROPERTIES' ARBOR VISTA PROJECT Dear Honorable Members of the City Council and Planning Commission: We are writing to support Regent Properties'Arbor Vista project (the "Project") at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. We are residents of the Meadowview community which is adjacent to the southern portion of the Project. Regent has attended several of our Homeowners' Association meetings to answer questions and address the concerns of the Meadowview residents. We appreciate Regents' outreach efforts and the open dialogue we have with the Regent team. The Project is a well thought through plan that results in a wonderful project to have as our neighbor. We also believe the Project is a benefit to the City and its residents at large because of the clustered layout of the homes which will result in the significant preservation of a large amount of open space. In addition, the recreational amenities and trails provided by the Project are also wonderful amenities for the community. We strongly urge you to support Regent's Arbor Vista Project. Thank you. Sincerely, , ... Qctivt., / ; 7, , Debbie and Tom Parnakian 40224 Paseo Sereno Temecula, CA 92591 I September 19,2013 City Council and City Planning Commission City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 RE: SUPPORT OF REGENT PROPERTIES' ARBOR VISTA PROJECT Dear Honorable Members of the City Council and Planning Commission: I am writing in support of Regent Properties' proposed Arbor Vista project(the"Project")at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. I live in the Meadowview community which is adjacent to the southern portion of the Project. Regent has attended several of our Homeowners' Association meetings to answer questions and address the concerns of me and my neighbors. I am appreciative of Regents' outreach efforts and the open dialogue I have with the Regent team. The Project is a well thought through plan that results in a wonderful project to have as our neighbor. I also believe the Project is a benefit to the City and its residents at large because of the clustered layout of the homes which will result in the significant preservation of a large amount of open space. In addition,the recreational amenities and trails provided by the Project are also wonderful amenities for the community. I strongly urge you to support Regent's Arbor Vista Project. Thank you. Sincerely, John Zick 30989 Calle Fuente Temecula,CA 92591 Wednesday, Sept 19,2013 Temecula Planning Commission: Commissioners, I am a home owner and resident of the Meadowview Community and our property is adjacent to the 73 acre Regent property that they propose to develop. Our property,APN 919230014, is located towards the SE end of the Regent property. I fully and whole heartedly support Regent's effort to rezone their property and to cluster the new homes close to Nicolas Road. I have no reservations about the project at all. As I understand it,the Regent property is now zoned tor very low density,which I believe to be about one house per every 2 %2 acres. That does not make economic sense because of the terrain and the blue-line creek that runs through it. Rezoning the section closest to Nicolas Road to allow for denser dwellings, and leaving the area around the blue-line creek as open space, is the best alternative. In fact, it makes the most economic sense. I have had dealings with Regent on another matter for the past 6-8 months and have found them to be very honest and forthright. I'm sure their project will be a success for them and the city. Sincerely, Raymond J. Stann Proposed Densities Area 1A - 1/2 Acre Density M Area 18 - 1/2 Acre Density •+ A Area 2 - 1 Acre Density (1/2 Acre Net) Area 3 - 2-112 Acre Density Area 4 - 1 Acre Density . (1/2 Acre Density in Sub-Area) 3 41 - -r r�1J N I _ t '> 1 AC. \ A1 . L1, 1V. F'1►ti%Ax,1 O -1 Ilike7y. Notice of Public Hearing �' 1989 e �r<«�:�.„Fw�Q�`� A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA12-0131, PA12-0132, PA12-0133, and PA12-0134 Applicant: Lenny Dunn, Regent Properties Proposal: A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots, a Residential Home Product Review for 83 lots, a Zoning Map and text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO), and a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Case Planner: Matt Peters, AICP, (951) 694-6408 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: May 21, 2014 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. � ' W v � 'w D Rio 1/ n r � • ���+ �� 4i , 4u► ,.9i Y �w � � � lpA + iiii � -t 0 . :A I Pro j ect Site Al,w✓iergmunitool . 0010%.1: Ai 043a'. / 4*r;�•a�=fi+�+%y1�� �. ♦ .:;s• ....0.11,611—TI”„ ii govezivard ,:/et, /-4%; rok 1 ,4vV44 13,9 pi it, ♦ �N I--N aIiLIIIIIlIcllAt.hh- v 4■ pat 250 500 1,000• . Feet • The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.