Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout032691 CC Agenda A G;NZ)A TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL EXECUTIV~ SESSION: 5:00 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL, 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE Closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (a) and (b) to discuss pending anti potential litigation - Dawes vs the County of Riverside. A REOULAR MEETING TEMECULA TEMPORARY COMMUNITY CENTER- 27475 COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE MARCH 26, 1991 - 7:00 PM Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 91-09 Resolution: No. 91-.~9 CALL TO ORDER: Invocation Pastor Kenneth Molnar New Community Lutheran Church Flag Salute Brownie Girl Scout Troop Number 785 Kathy Miller, Leader ROLL CALL: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mufioz, Parks PRESENTATION$/ PROCLAMATION$ Proclamation - Building Safety Week Proclamation - Health Fair Expo Day Proclamation - Day of the Young Child PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council about an item not listed on ths Agenda, a pink 'Request To Speak' form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. For all other agenda items a 'Request To Speak' form must be filed with the City Clerk before the Council gets to that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. 03/21/81 NOTICJ~ TO THJ= PUBLIC All matters listed under ConsQnt Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR Standard Ordinance Adoorion Procedure RECOMMENDATION 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of March 12, 1991 as mailed. 3 Resolution Aoorovino Ust of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AI&OWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policv RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file report. 2/leende/0812~O 2 03;21/~1 6 Reiection of Bids - Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Reject all bids received for Bid Numbers 91-0002, 91-0003, 91-0004 and 91-0005. Acceotance of Public !mDrovements - Tract P3177 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Accept the public improvements in Tract No. 23177. 6.2 Authorize the reduction in Street and Drainage improvement and Sewer and Water System Faithful Performance bond amounts. 6.3 Accept the surety bond endorsement for the reduced amounts and accept the subdivision agreement rider. 6.4 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Final Vesting Tract Mao No. 2~637-F A 126 lot subdivision on 25.59 acres located at the northwest corner of North General Kearny Road and Nicholas Road. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-F, Amended No. 2, subject to the conditions of approval. 8 Final Vesting Tract Man No. ~6~7-1 A 93 lot subdivision on 19.60 acres located at the northeast corner of North General Kearny Road and Nicholas Road. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve Final Vesting Tract Map No.22627-1, Amended No. 2, subject to the conditions of approval. 9 Adoption of Proposed Street Name - Overland Avenue RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt "Overland Avenue" as the official name of that certain proposed street from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road, presently unofficially designated as Apricot Avenue. 10 11 Resolution of SuPport for the City of Lake Elsinore Reeardina Entitlement of Lake Elsinore. (Placed on the agenda at the request of Mayor Parks) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, SUPPORTING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO ACQUIRE AND EXERCISE JURISDICTION OF THE LAKE Second Readin= of Ordinance AdoDtino Redevelopment Plan RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Read by title only, and adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA A C TIVA TING THE REDEVEL OPMENTA OENCY OF TEMCULA AND DECLARING AND DE$1GNA TING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUL4 AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 12 .Aooroval of Final Tract MaD No. ~4133-1 - Bedford Properties A 160 lot residential subdivision located north of Amarita Way and Montelegro Way RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24133-1 subject to the conditions of approval. 2/~nM/oe 12e0 4 03/21/81 13 Ar)oroval of Final Tract Mar) No. 24133-2 - Bedford Pror)erties A 111 lot residential subdivision located east of Amarita Way and south of Santiago Road. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24133-2 subject to the conditions of approval. 14 Ar)r)roval of Final Tract Mar) No. 24133-3 - Bedford Pror)erties A 140 lot residential subdivision located southeast of Amarita Way and north of Santiago Road. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve Final Tract Map No. 24133-3 subject to the conditions of approval. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15 Ordinance Amendment No. 91-1 An amendment to Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.30(f) to allow time extensions for plot plan approvals. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt an Ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE 90-04 PERTAININO TO EXTENSIONS OF TIME APPROVAL PERIODS FOR PLOT PLANS 2/Nende/0e 12e0 6 03;21J~1 16 Vestina Tentative Tract Man No. PP6P7 - First Extension of Time A 220 lot subdivision of approximately 53 acres located north of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearney Road. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 22627 A 220 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 53 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF NICOLAS ROAD AND EAST OF GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 919-350-022, 024, AND 025. 17 Tentative Parcel Mao No. 23335 - First Extension of Time A six (6) lot commercial subdivision located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA APPRO VINO THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335, A SIX (6) PARCEL COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES LOCA TED NORTH OF THE JUNCTION OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910- · 110029, 031, AND 910-180-018. 211glndl/O~ 1280 ~ 03/21/91 18 Electricity Franchise - Southern California Edison RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES. POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA CSD MEETING - (To be held at 8:00 PM) - ~ease see separate agenda COUNCIL BUSINESS 19 Consideration of Bus Shelters - Temecula Valley Transit (Continued from the meeting of March 13, 1991 ). RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 With the concurrence of both the applicant and City staff, continue this matter to the meeting of April 9, 1991. 20 Communitv Service Funding Re(~uest Criteria (Continued from the meeting of January 29, 1991 ). RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Review report and advise staff regarding the criteria for the Community Service Funding Application process for Fiscal Year 1991-92. 211~ndWO81280 ? 03/21/81 21 Adoption of County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan (Continued from the meeting of March 12, 1991 ). RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. 22 23 City of Temecula Street Maintenance Repair and StriDing Program (Placed on the agenda at the request of Councilmember Mufioz) RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Receive and file report. Reouest for Flag Prooram - Old Town Temecula Merchants Association RECOMMENDATION: 23.1 Authorize the sum of $2,000, from the discretionary fund, to cover the cost of brackets and American flags. 24 AdoDtion of Regulations Regardino Flood Damage Prevention RECOMMENDATION: 24.1 Read by title only, and introduce an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION. 24.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMPL YINO WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBSIDIZED FLOOD INSURANCE. 24.3 Authorize the City Engineer to submit the application for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT CITY COUNCIL REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: April 9, 1991,7:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California. 2/.oendWO81280 I 03/21/81 PROCLAMATIONS & PRESENTATIONS Proclamation The City of Temecula WHEREAS, the Day of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public attention on the needs of young children and their families, particularly the need for high quality childhood programs; and WHEREAS, this celebration is sponsored by the National Association for the Education of Young Children, the country's largest organization of early childhood professionals; and WHEREAS, the goal of this day is to build public understanding of the importance of early childhood programs in our society and to foster needed public support for these programs, and; WHEREAS, the Day of the Young Child will be held at Temecula Elementary School on March 30th from 9:30 AM until 2:30 PM, and; WHEREAS, this year's theme will be the Teddy Bear's Picnic, and all activities for children such as food, balloons, games and entertainment will be free, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby proclaims March 30, 1991, The Day of the Young Child IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 26th Day of March, 1991. Ronald J. Parks Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk Rancho Vista Academy Inc, February 22, 1991 Dear Mayor Ronald Parks, We, the committee for the event, The Day of the Young Child, request to be placed on the March 26th agenda in order to present a Declaration for the Day of the Young Child. The Declaration is to be presented by local preschool children. The presentation will take about five minutes. At the time of the presentation we will ask our City Council to proclaim March 30th the Day of the Young Child in Temecula. The Day of the Young Child is an annual celebration that focuses public attention on the needs of young children and their families, particularly the need for high quality early childhood programs. Sponsored by the National Associaton for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), the country's largest orgaization of early childhood professionals, the goal of the week is to build public understanding to the importance of early childhood programs in our society and to foster needed public support for these programs. Although sponsored nationally, most of the celebrations are planned and implemented on a community basis. The Day of the Young Child will be held at Temecula Elementary School on . March 30th. The event is from 9:30 a.m. until 2:30 p.m. Area preschools, schools, P.T.A.'s organizations, and service groups will provide activities for children to enjoy. Food, Balloons, games and free entertainment will be enjoyed. All activities are free and children must be accompanied by an adult. Thm theme choosen this year is The Teddy Bears' Picnic. We thank the City Council for their support. Sincerely, Edna McCallion Coychairperson EM/cj f 29601 Mira Loma Drive/Temecula, California 92390/(714) 676-5255 Proclamation The City of Temecula WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula wishes to encourage the citizens of Temecula to exercise more control over their health by assuming personal responsibility to promote and maintain a health lifestyle; and WHEREAS, a Health Fair Expo will be conducted on Saturday April 13, 1991, coordinated by Temecula Valley Chiropractic; and WHEREAS, Health Fair Expo is in its 14th year of community service to the Temecula area, offering free health education and screening services that promote healthy lifestyles, and; WHEREAS, Health Fair Expo screened 68,000 Southland residents last year and over 3/4 million residents in the past 14 years, and; WHEREAS, Health Fair Expo is sponsored by the American Red Cross, Chevron USA, Inc., KNBC-TV Channel 4, Blue Cross of California and the Hospital Council of Southern California, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby proclaims April 13, 1991, Health Fair Expo Day IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affLxed this 26th Day of March, 1991. Ronald J. Parks Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk The Honorable Ron Parks City Hall P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 Health Fair Expo P.o. Box 57930 2700 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90057 (213) 739-5266 Dear Mayor Parks: As you know, Dr. Donald Myren is a dedicated citizen in this community and is committed to bringing quality programs and services to the residents of the Temecula Valley. As health care and the preservation of health becomes a more prominent issue to the people of Temecula, our organization has been increasingly involved in emphasizing health education and the importance of early disease detection. In light of this commitment, both to the community and to health education, Temecula Valley Chiropractic has sponsored an Annual Health Fair Expo for the past two years. We will again conduct a Health Fair this year, Saturday, April 13th from 9:00 A.M. - 2:00 P.M. at the temporary location of the Temecula Towne Assoration, celebrating better health for the community of Temecula and bringing its residents the opportunity to take advantage of free health screenings and education. Your support is needed in this community-wide effort sponsored by the American Red Cross, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., the Hospital Council of Southern California, KNBC-TV, Blue Cross of California, and Temecula Valley Chiropractic. As Hayor of this city, your involvement in introducing a proclamation at the City Council meeting on April 9, 1991 will draw attention and community support to the Health Fair Expo event. We also invite you to be the first person through our Health Fair Expo site as part of our opening ceremony on Saturday, April 13th at 8:45 A.M. I will be in contact with your office within a few days to check on your interest in this proposal. Should you or your staff have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 699-6226. Sincerely, Dr. Donald H~en Site Coordinator Temecula Valley Health Fair Expo Temecula Valley Chiropractic 4 KNBE-TV Ik Ho~/Coum~ Southern ¢~I Blue Cross of Cahforn~8 Proclamation The City of Temecula WHEREAS, from the inception of this nation, it has been the responsibility of the states and their local governments to adopt legislation and enforce laws and ordinances whenever necessary to protect their citizens' health, welfare and safety; and WHEREAS, it has been a fundamental part of the democratic principles of this nation to involve all interested and affected parties from both the public and private sectors in the formulation, adoption and, to the fullest extent possible, in the administration of such laws and ordinances; and WHEREAS, among the most basic of the laws and ordinances which have been so derived are those acts which assure the public's health and safety in the buildings in which people live, work and play, and WHEREAS, to assure such safety, the City of Temecula, enforces a uniform building code which has been designed and is maintained with the assistance of the building industry and the consumers; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Temecula hereby proclaims April 8 - 12, 1991 as, Building Safety Week IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this 26th Day of March, 1991. Ronald J. Parks Mayor June S. Greek City Clerk APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: City Council/City Manager Anthony Elmo, Chief Building Official March 26, 1991 NATIONAL BUILDING SAFETY WEEK - APRIL 8 - 12, 1991 National Building Safety Week (NBSW), sponsored by the International Conference of Building Officials in conjunction with County and City building departments across the country, is now beginning its second decade. NBSW was created to promote public awareness of building safety, and to remind and inform people of our integral part in our jurisdictional safety network providing services aimed at preserving human life and the community's future. When you enter a building, whether it is a multi-story office building, a clothing store, or a theater, do you ever stop and wonder why door exits and exit signs are placed where they are, or why a corridor is constructed the way it is? Generally, we take these things for granted. Your Building and Safety Department has the responsibility of ensuring that corridors and exit placements are installed to protect you while occupying a building or in emergency situations. This is a task the Building and Safety Department takes seriously. During National Building Safety Week, your Building and Safety Department has planned several activities to acquaint the public with the services it offers: Upon request, Building and Safety staff will provide the public, either in the office or in the field, with assistance in planning their future construction projects. Staff will provide information and direction to the public in obtaining building permits for, otherwise, unpermitted work. This, too, can be done either in the field or in the office. No penalties will be assessed and no fees will be charged for this service during National Building and Safety Week. An educational video on building codes will be available for viewing in the lobby of the Building and Safety Department, 43180 Business Park Drive, Suite 200, from 8 AM to 5 PM, during National Building and Safety Week. On April 10, 1991, an opportunity to accompany City building inspectors on a typical building impection will be offered. Reservation information can be obtained by calling the Building and Safety Department at (714) 694-6439. Public information and literature will be available to the public in the Building and Safety Department lobby. This information will range from specifications for constructing a lightweight patio cover, a masonry f'weplace, to construction of a room addition; Information from the State Contractors License Board, and information from Rancho California Water District regarding household hazardous Waste will also be available. We look forward to meeting members of the community and developing an open line of communication for dealing with Building and Safety issues in the community. ITEM NO. 1 ITEM NO. 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL HELD MARCH 12, 1991 A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 6:35 PM at the Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding. PRESENT 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Also present were City Manager David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and City Clerk June S. Greek. Mayor Parks recessed the meeting at 6:36 PM to an Executive Session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c) to discuss initiation of litigation. The meeting was reconvened at 7:12 PM with all members present. INVOCA T/ON The invocation was given by Pastor Gary Nelson, Calvary Chapel. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Birdsall. PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS Mayor Parks proclaimed March 12, 1991, "Peace Corps Day In Temecula". In support of President Bush and the United States Armed Forces, Mayor Parks read a proclamation, signed by all five Councilmembers, which will be sent to President Bush. PUBLIC FORUM Edward Doran, 39985 Stamos Court, spoke in opposition to the City Council/City Manager Strategic Planning Workshop and questioned the anticipated cost, and estimated completion time of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. # i nutes\031291 - 1 - 03/18/91 Citv Council Minutes March 12, 1991 City Manager Dixon answered that three proposals have been submitted and they range from $460,000 to $580,000. He reported the estimated completion date would be 18 to 24 months. Barbara Pearson, 30150 Via Monterey, announced to the City plans for "Operation Homecoming", scheduled for May 11, 1991 at 10:00 AM. She stated a parade, followed by an Old Town Temecula Social is planned, and asked the City Council issue a proclamation to that effect. Catherine Arriola, 29830 Corte Castille, asked why the recent workshop was not held in Temecula at a local facility. She also asked how many consulting firms were interviewed, and of the firm chosen, how many cities has it worked with. City Manager Dixon responded that the firm, headed by David Jones, has worked with the League of California Cities for many years and has done thousands of seminars. He said the firm is highly respected throughout California. Mayor Parks explained the reason the meeting was not held locally was because it required a highly concentrated effort and when Councilmembers are in their own City, many distractions occur. Sydney Vernon, 30268 Mersey Court, stated his opposition to the use of public funds for the three-day seminar held on May 8, 9, and 10. Allan McDonald, 43466 Manzano Drive, representing Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, asked that the agenda items dealing with redevelopment be tabled until further study is done. CONSENT CALENDAR City Manager Dixon stated staff requests that Item No. § be removed from the agenda. Councilmember Mu~oz requested that Items 11 and 13 be removed from the Consent Calendar. #inutes\031291 -2- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12, 1991 It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4, 6-10, 12 and 14. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks None None Moore, Standard Ordinance Adoption Procedure 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda· Minutes 2.1 Approve the minutes of February 26, 1991 as mailed· City Treasurer's Report for the Month endine January 31. 1991 3.1 Receive and file report. Resolution Approvin~l List of Demands 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Minutes\031291 -3- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12. 1991 6. Acceptance of Public Improvements - Parcel Mao No. 19626-1 6.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 19626-1. 6.2 Authorize the reduction of street, sewer and water system bond amounts and accept replacement Faithful Performance bonds for the reduced amounts. 6.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 7. Acceptance of Public Imorovements - Parcel Map No. 19626-2 7.1 Accept the public improvements in Parcel Map No. 19626-2. 7.2 Authorize the reduction of street, sewer and water system bond amounts and accept replacement Faithful Performance bonds for the reduced amounts. 7.3 Direct the City Clerk to so advise the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. 8. Cooperative A(~reement for Temecula Valley Via Del Coronado Storm Drain 8.1 Approve the Temecula Valley Via Del Coronado Storm Drain, Tract Map No. 23267 and a Cooperative Agreement with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and The Presley Companies. 8.2 Authorize the execution and attestation of the agreement in its final form by the Mayor and City Clerk. 9. I- 15 Over-crossing Project 9.1 Approve an extension of agreement with All City Management. 10. Aporoval of Final Parcel Map No. 24239 o Amended No. I 10.1 Approve Final Parcel Map No. 24239, Amended No. 1, subject to the Conditions of Approval. Minutes\031291 -4- 05/18/91 City Council Minutes 12. Public Works Bid Procedures 12.1 March 12, 1991 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REGARDING UNIFORM PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION COST ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES 14. Cooperative A~lreement for CalTrans for Desitin of Rancho California Road Off and On Ramps 14.1 Authorize the Mayor to execute the Cooperative Agreement with CalTrans for design of the Rancho California Road Off/On Ramps. 11. Approval of Final Tract Map No. 23992 - Amended No. 1 Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated the requested action is only to subdivide the property. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to approve Final Tract Map No. 23992, Amended No. 1, subject to the amended Conditions of Approval. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCILMEMBERS: None Moore, Ninutes\031291 -5- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes 13. March 12, 1991 Western Ridgeline Policies It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue this item until the end of the meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None COUNCIL BUSINESS 15. Television/Radio Transmittim.7 Antenna Follow-uo Report Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning, introduced the staff report. Mayor Parks requested that since he did not have sufficient time to review this item it be continued to a later date. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemarts to continue this item to the meeting of April 23, 1991. The motion was carried by the following vote: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 City Manager Dixon introduced newly appointed Ochenduszko. Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks None None Assistant City Manager, Mark Hinutes\031291 -6- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes 16. Consideration of Bus Shelters- Temecula Valley Transit March 12. 1991 City Attorney Scott Field recommended continuing this item for two weeks allowing adequate time to review the proposed contract. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to continue this item to the meeting of March 26, 1991. Councilmember Mu~oz expressed his opposition to continuing this item, stating Mr. Mindiola is a private citizens and every time this is continued it creates a financial hardship. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks NOES: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Mu~oz ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None RECESS Mayor Parks called a recess at 8:09 PM. was reconvened at 8:52 PM. Following the CSD Meeting, the meeting COUNCIL BUSINESS (CONT) 17. Establishment and Activation of a Redevelopment A~Tencv City Attorney Field introduced the staff report. He reported this action would be the first step in taking over the County Redevelopment Agency. He stated this action is necessary to settle the law suit. J. Craig Johnson, 400 Mission Square, Riverside, representing the Temecula Valley Unified School District, asked that Items 17 and 18 be continued until a meeting could be set up between the City Council and the School District. He asked several questions, as follows: Hinutes\031291 -7- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12, 1991 Councilmember Mu~oz stated that the settlement of the law suit will be in the best interest of the entire community, including the school district. He stated that advisory committees could not be included in negotiations to settle a law suit. Mayor Parks called a break at 9:21 PM to change the tape. The meeting was reconvened at 9:22 PM. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to waive further reading of the ordinance. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Mu~oz to introduce and read by title only, an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 91-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTIVATING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA AND DECLARING AND DESIGNA TING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Hinutes\031291 -9- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12, 1991 18. Adoption of the County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan City Attorney Field introduced the staff report. Bonnie Reed, 1721 Ascend Road, San Marcos, representing the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association, asked to be included in discussions regarding this item and requested it be tabled until comments can be heard from all interested parties. Nancy Maurice, 45788 Creekside Way, representing the Temecula Museum Association, requested that they be kept informed as to the activity of the Redevelopment Plan and asked that this item be continued. Robert Hemme, 28465 Front Street, #121, asked that this item be tabled and stated it does have an impact on the anticipated Redevelopment funds. Mayor Parks stated he needed to feel more comfortable with the issue before voting for approval. City Manager Dixon advised that Council's action would introduce the ordinance and the ensuing two weeks would give the various groups and the City Council an opportunity to become more comfortable with the issue. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue to the meeting of March 26, 1991. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue the meeting until 10:30 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Minutes\031Z91 -10- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12, 1991 19. Under~round Utility Lines Along Winchester Road Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, introduced the staff report. Councilmember Mu~oz stated he was aware of technology that would make it possible to underground all utility lines. City Manager Dixon stated he would ask Southern California Edison to prepare a report and address the issue with the City Council. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to receive and file staff report. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 20. Stop $i~7n Placement- Ynez Road Between Solana Way and Winchester Road Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, introduced the staff report. Dick Fewell, 38015 Calle Amigable, Murrieta, asked that a grace period be allowed for the first week this stop sign was installed (February 18 -25), stating that he received a citation for running the stop sign one day after it was installed. Mayor Parks asked that staff look into a grace period as it did with the newly installed no-left turn sign on Ynez Road. It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to receive and file the staff report and directed the Chief of Police to review the matter of granting a grace period to citizens who received traffic citations during the first week the stop signs were in place. Ninutes\051291 -11- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Mu~oz, Parks 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None March 12, 1991 Lindemans, Moore, 21. Reconsideration of Council Committee A$$i~7nments Councilmember Moore stated that she asked this item be placed on the agenda because she had a desire to work on the General Plan Committee and felt it was unfair that her name was removed from that committee during a Council meeting she was unable to attend. Councilmember Mu~oz stated that the rationale behind the change was that he and Mayor Parks worked on the committee to select the consultants for the general plan. Mayor Parks stated that one area of expertise he brings to the City Council is in the area of Planning. He suggested that Councilmember Moore serve as an alternate. Councilmember Moore stated that she was active when the SWAP was put together and could be of value on this committee. It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to reconsider Council Committee Assignments. Councilmember Birdsall withdrew the motion, Councilmember Lindemans withdrew the second. It was moved by Councilmember Mu~oz, seconded by Mayor Parks to refer this item to staff. Minutes\031Z91 -1Z- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12, 1991 Will the transfer from the County to the City be adopted in its current state and all its terms and provisions left intact with respect to being a County Redevelopment Plan? Does the City Council know of, anticipate, or consider any changes to the current provisions or scope of the Redevelopment Plan? Does the City plan to honor all County agreements that were entered into in connection with the adoption of the County Redevelopment Plan, specifically with respect to agreements that concern the division of tax increment revenues between the Redevelopment Agency and other taxing entities, including the School District? Has the City Council planned any projects using Redevelopment money other than those specific projects currently envisioned under the County Redevelopment Plan? City Attorney Field stated that as a general matter, no action tonight will in any way effect the School District or its pass through agreement. He stated what is being proposed is to activate the agency and adopt the County Plan as the City's own plan. He stated that all debts and other obligations, according to law, are assumed by the City agency. He advised there is no recommended action to amend the County Plan. He said there are no projects being proposed at this point and when projects are being proposed, they will be on the agenda at which time all environmental requirements will be met. City Attorney Field stated that he is not at liberty to discuss the terms of the law suit. He said it has not yet been finalized, however the settlement will be coming before the Council within the next 30 days, at which time it will be discussed in an open public hearing. He stated it is the City's intent to meet with the School District as soon as possible to address their concerns. Evelyn Harker, 31130-85 South General Kearny Road, representing the Old Town Merchants Association, asked that this item be postponed to enable the present committee to meet with the City representatives. Robert Hemme, 28465 Front Street, #121, Chairman of the Advisory Committee for the County of Riverside to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency asked that this matter be tabled until all concerned parties can meet and have their concerns addressed. Minutes\031Z91 -8- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes March 12. 1991 The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Mu~oz, Parks Moore, NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None Councilmember Birdsall announced at 10:40 PM she needed to leave since she would be taking an early morning flight to attend a League of California Cities Community Services Committee meeting. 13. Western Riddleline Policies Gary Thornhill, Director of Planning, introduced the staff report. Larry Markam, 41750 Commerce Center Drive, representing the applicant, stated that mitigation measures have been offered to the County and he would offer the same mitigation to the City. It was moved by Councilmember Linderoans, seconded by Mayor Parks to extend the meeting to 1 1:1 5 PM. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall City Manager Dixon suggested supporting the County staff position, and leaving the issue of Ridgeline policies to the City Planning Commission for their recommendation. It was moved by Councilmember Lindemans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to direct staff to notify the County of Riverside Planning Department that the Council supports the County position and to refer the matter of a Hillside policy to the City Planning Commission to develop an interim policy for Ridgeline development. #inures\031291 -13- 03/18/91 City Council Minutes The motion was carried by the following vote: March 12, 1991 AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Linderoans, Moore, Mu~oz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: I COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall Councilmember Mu~oz announced that on Agenda Item No. 11, Council's action was for final approval of a Condo Tract Map. Doug Stewart, Deputy City Engineer, stated this map was previously approved by the County and it is a final tract map. CITY MANAGER REPORT None given. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Councilmember Lindemans requested the matter of the City implementing a pot hole repair program and a program for street sweeping be investigated by staff. Councilmember Mu~oz requested that a report on the pot hole repair program be placed on the next agenda. He also requested that the Postmaster be contacted and a request to repair the large hole in front of the Post Office be made. Councilmember Mu~oz asked that the traffic signal at Front Street and Del Rio be checked to be sure it is operating properly. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Councilmember Linderoans, seconded by Councilmember Moore to adjourn at 11:15 PM to a meeting on March 26, 1991 for an Executive Session at City Hall at 5:00 PM., and the regular meeting at 7:00 PM, at the Temporary Temecula Community Center. The motion was unanimously carried with Councilmember Birdsall absent. #inures\031291 -14- 0]/18/91 ITEM NO. 3 RESOLUTIONA NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLMMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amounts of $658,366.30 SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. APPROVE!~ AND ADOVrED, this 26th day of March, 1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 3fRe~o~ 151 ! ITEM NO. 4 r-j C) 1:3 r~ 1 1'1 m O' -h nnn~B~nn~ ~ an n C~ ~ -h l-J t.) t-.) F,) ,1.1 ':-:, ~ l'..J ~ ~0 ~ O' C-I ~ (4 Ell O' t..J O) ~O Lli ~ ~ ',4 C~ 0 t'J l...1 C, (4 `8'~10' ~..h'.4 Ult..J 6'4-b Lq -h C' Lq Lq ~ ~ ~ ~'.'1 '-4 0" ~:.'l *q `8,8 ~'4 ,l~ t-J, ~ 4~ `8 ~ -h C, 04 ~ t'.3 C, O' ~ -h t..3 C.-I ~ ',4 ',l .h Cl~ '-,I 611 0' ,*', .h C, Eli C, l...,I ~14~ ~'4`8 0" ~-,8 t...l~ U1Lli `8Lq COO 0`8 -~,0' ~-8 `8 t..)"4 Lq-h `8`80' C' U1 Lq `8 ~ `8 Lq r..~l ,8 C.i (.11 m C, C.4 C, ,,0 0 0,~, 4a-,4 C..i 0 Lq C, *,4 C, ~ C, O- gO O- '..4 [-3 C, C.'4 C.'4 t'.) t'.) C.-4 6'4 ,1,4 C.l C-'4 C..i `8 C, C, `8 LqLqtqtqLliLq C,C, ~0~0 ~ 0 ~ I.J 0 C, ~ ~ ~ t..)~ ~ ~ I C,O©OC, C, O,Z,~ C-'4 C, ~ m o c, c,,c,c, o,~, z ,~ oc,,o,s,c, o ~l..) ~ `8`8`8`8`8 ~ `8`8 · ,,~ n ~ n ~o0o ~ mm ~ ..... ~ ,, CCCOO0 "' ""' C CC ~CC · ZZ C4 f..) · '",C, ,"', c', ,~ O C, C, C, O O .C,,O O ,:~,C, O C, C, O C, C, ,", C, O O C.,C, C, O O ,2,O O C, C, C, O C, ,", ,'-', O O O O C, C, C, C, C, O O ,C, C, O C, ,", C, C, O C, O C, C, ,", O O C, C, C., © C, C, C, ,O C, ,-, © O ,D C, O C, © C, O r', i~', '=' C, C, C, C, C, O C' 0 C, O © C, C, C, C, C, © O C, C, "" C, C, C, C, C, C' ,", C' ,-~,C, O C, O ,D C, C, C, C, "', C' C, Lli O' -h t',3 i'..) t'.) F.,I ,:4 C, ~. t'..) ~. I~ ~.. lB- ~.'4 "--' ,:4 Lq O* r...160 E) Lq .~ -h ~4 ~ C, h.1 t-..I ,-', ~:.-i `8 '*.40' I~ -h ',,J Lq l...1 C.'4 .b Lli .1~ :~., Lq Lq 0" O' 8:) s'..4 %J ~ C.I 'q `8 ~:.-i -ht-.) O' ~ `8 -b 4:, 0 C.,I ~ t.3 ,"', ~ ~-' -h l..) f..'4 ~ '-4 '-4 4a Lq ",4 Lli I~ C, 4::, C, Lq 'C' 4~ t-3 ".4 -h 04 `8 0' '"' ,0 t'.) ,-' Lq Eli 4:1 Lq ~) 0 C' ,0 -h O' ~/) -O .8 t.) "4 Lq 4:~ 4:) `80' '.~' cq L.q *.0 ~ -0 Lq i".~ ',0 (.'4 Lq 8[3 C, 6'4 C, 0 0 "-" 0 .la ~.J O'4 C, Lq C, *'4 C, IZI © 0~ IOD ~ ~1 < < n n $ 0 O~ 0 Z (.'4 (h 0' O- © © © Z -Of- © -q C Z 0 r~ F' Lq £q © 00 t'..) -I~ '.4 ~-4 t'.J t'..) t...1 (.'I [') -~ r..) ,:.,t .8 t-J t..) Lq Cq .~ O- .l~ ~ C.I ,M ~ .~ Lq Lq ~' O- i'-.J r..) Lq cri l..J t..) C..~ 6.1 0- ..4 -q Eft O- ,3, C, O O 43 mt-.) N,I '.4 C, C, C, F. JO -,~ -~ (4 '.4 .O Cq cq O C, -0 ..~ 64 ~ q cq "', O C, O .~ ~ Lq q C, C, t.J t..) C, -O ~-. -,0 f_. t-.) t..] ~l .O C, 0 O, ,M 0' 'q C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, ,C, 0 C, L1 l..) C, t C, C, ,D ,r:,C, O ,~ 0 0 0 C, 0 C, O 0 ,-, O ,_"t, ,:-:, C, 0 ,D O C, ,r:, C, C' C, C, r', 'C. ,C, C, C, C' O O O "'"O ,r:, O C, O O ,-', C, O O ,"', O O C, C, C' C, C, C, '-, C, 'C' ,3, C, "'" C, '-' C, C, C, r',0 ,", O C, O C, C, C, O C, C, O C, C, ,", C, C, C, C, '"" C, r', Ell 0 0 © © N 0 -] -O C: Lq O' :2' ¢1 ~. n ~ 43 %Z t-O no U ~ln n 0 0 n 0 ~,, 0 Z F -< ~ r- 111 < 00~ 0 0 m ,o "qt'~ rq m ~ 6'~ rq ,:,.I f'q ~ ITI ~-. Z x ITI C, = ,:..1 r I ~ rq Z C I ,.O 0 ' C' ~ ,>~ '~. '=. r ~O~O ~ ~. ~> :~ :l: Z 0 ,:4 c~ 4~ 0 r' ,~ t'3 ,'4 0' ~ 0'- 0* 0' t'3 &4 ~ I]O 1.3 ~ t-3 t..3 ~ ~ C, 0 ~ Lfi C' (4 t'J tq Eft ~ ~ Lq ~ ~ ~ C, C, ,>.1 6'1 Lf : C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, 0 C, O C, O O C, C, C, C, C, C, ,'"' C, C, © O C, C, C, C, C, :' C, 'C' C, C' C, C, C, C' C' C, C' C, C' C, C, C' C, C, "', 0 C' C' C' C, '"' 0 C' C, C' C. C, ,:C, C' ,~, '-' 'C, C, C, C, C, C, C' 'C, C, 'C' 0 0 0 C, C' C, C' C' '"" C. C, C' 'C, ,C, C' C' ,'4 t'3 ,:4 O' ~ C~ ~ 0~ t'.3 ,:4 ~ E0 t3 t.0 ,L4 ,:.-1 ,>4 ,L4 ,L4 64 ~ Cfi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (4 1'3 Cfi ,L4 ~ ~ '~' C' Cq cq ~ ~ C' C, C, ~ ~ Cfi ~ ~ ~ 1'3 t'.3 ~ C, C' .~ ~ ~ t'3 t'3 ~ ~ 0 C, ~ Eft 0 t.'l t',3 ~ Cq cq ~ ~ t. ~ ~ ~ O C' 6'1 ,:..t cq Lq C" ~ ~ C' C, ~ ~ C' C' ~ F.3 ~ ~ ~ C' C' C' C, N O E~ ~ ~ ~ C' C, N ~ r-0 FJ ,:=, ,~, C. cq 'C' C. C, C, C, C, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C, C, C, 0 C, C, ,D C, ~ ~ C, C, ~ ~ C. C, I '3' C, '3' C, C, C' ~, C' 0 0 0 '3, 0 0 C, 0 0 '3, 0 'C' 0 C, C, r-', 0 ,3, C' C, C' 0 C, C, C, 0 ,C, C, C, i~=', C, C, C, C, ,'~, C, C, C, C, C, ,C, C, C, C, 0 C, C, C, C, C, C, C, 0 C, C, (.4 t'..) 0' t '01 ¢nl I I t-J 61100 ~ C' -0 ..~-O ~-0 r- } ~60 ,'4 0)~ ~ ..'~ ,8 -8 ,8,8 'ri } C, O C, C, C' C, C, .I t'.) ~L"l["Jt"] t'3 t"] (--.I t"3 ~' C' C' "" t'3 "" ~ r- C. ;, C' C, O O Lfi O ~ ~ tJ. t'.)t'.]I..JC, t.) Z F J '-4 ',4 '4'-4 ~rJ t-) t.J l-.J r..] t. 3 t-.] :, .D C, C, C, ~ C, ~ ITI :.-8 O -8C, O' C, n ,-C Cq -0 m O"4 Z :g ~3 ~ "] ~ 6.1 ~ ~ d q I'~ '-4 "' C. ,[- ',8Lq - r~ L*I L-J~ '-4- ] (4 t'] 80 C, ;, "r .~ -,r I"..) ~ 1 ~- O.t 'TI ITI'~ ('J TI ~.-- i"~ :2'7. I:DSD~ t..] ,'"'~ 3, C, C' ,5 C, C, C' C, C, 0 C' C, C, C, C' C, C, C, C, C, C, C, '-' C, n -H o © O C, C, m 04) O tgm tgm n rq 37. © 0 © m (4 ©,0 ¢4,.". rJl~ ~.,.--I 0 t.,3 -4 om (-j o z r- F.] "q o.-4 z u1 m C, C' © o o :~,, ,5 ,:, .:, o ~, ;~: .=, rq (..11 Eft rq Eft "'4 ~ ".4 "q ',.4 ,0 ~ ~J O' C, ,0 m '3, C, C, 0 C, C. C, 6.4 (...~ ,24 f...4 (4 ~..3 ~ ~ ~ C, © 0 0 C: C. C, ~ ~ ~ 6.4 ~ ,L..~ 1-..I t..3 ~- ~1 ~1 C, t..3 C, t..3 t.J t..3 t..3 -0 :~ ,L.'l ~ C, ',4'W El'-4 ,80' ~> C, ~' .01TI 0 c, rq ~ -4 ---I ~ Z I .< .H C, C, 0 C, C, C, 0 C, C, C, 0 0 C, t-.] 'El. t'O ~ t.J t'.-) t'J t-3 t'J r.O t',] :~ (4 '-I 64 IT1 -,8'~ ,8 r21 ,0-8,0,8,8,8,0 ~ ~m I-- ,0-1 ,0 ,01::2 I- r~ -< ~ t") fri 0 ~ C..". ,_, ._,~. --I -r "~ I FJ ~ Z Z ~ ITI ~ ~. ~ C, ,-, r-, C, r-, C, "-" C., Z 0 0 ~ n frl n 'rl -q -rl '11 'q -I1 'l'l n ,.-, F1 [') rl ~ A 0 n 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 O 0 -4 0 Z ~ ~ 0 O0 O0 Or-) r~ Z ¢r 3[:> ~ 0 ~ ~ ,-t O) 000001--0 ~ 0 ~ C I Z ~ ~ 'q'q m'q O r..3 t-.3 ~ t'.3 C' -<. O ~-- '-4'.4 C'-~, I t-J "' r~ C, I Tt-rl 'rl"~ ITt I U) bd - .0 .8 r...) .8 ,:.~ ~ :D, T C, C, C, ,r*, C, C* C, C, ,5 C, ,:, C, O C, C, C: C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, 0 C, C, 0 C, C, C, C' C, C' ,", C' C, C, C, C, ,", 0 0 0 C, ,C. C, 0 C, C, C, C, ,5 C, C, C. C, 0 C, C, C, C, C, C' C, C, C, C, C, C, C, C, O C, © 0 C, 6'1 C' O ~4 [.11C' 00 O' *'4 ~ .~ r...1 t'J rfi 4~ C, C, f J1 ~ C. ,0 f-..I80 ~ ~ ,0 -.0 Lfi Lq O' C, C, C, 03 -8 C, G) C, ~ O- C, C, Lfi U1 C, C, Lq Lq C, t..3 O ,D E.q I~. ~- C, 4:~ C, CO O) O C, C' ,3, C, C, ,3, C, C, Lml C, ,", C, ,~',,:-.1-0 C, t.J rn m ,'", C, "'" C, C. C, C, C- C. m o o o o c, c, o D 0 C. Z r~ 'D C, C, '~l :: r.u -O '3' f3 c ,_-, o o c, c, c, o o C. o c, o o c, ? ? c, C, C, o ¢, ,o o o o C. C, z: :5: ~: c, o c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, ,_, ,~, c, c, c, c, ,-, o c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, c, ,:, c, c. ,z, c, o ,5 c, o c, c. c, ~ ,,o ,o .] o m no. '~Z O~ Or+ n 0 n ] ~ r~ 0 O $ 0 r~r~ C ~ .' D Z r~ ~, LL C L · 0 :> > c u P) b3 1'9 f", P3 0~ f'9 rj- 1~3 q3 0 W u .r3 03 0 0 Z~ Z ..J ('4 ,8 ¢ f..) 0 u Ld ..~ 14 U] C, I,_j rD r.) ~ f..':~ _c, h_Ll~ 0 r"~ ~ C'.I C' ('4 6'.~ TT lrZZ f-] 0 fl) ZZZ hIWW rj3 EL. 00'0'0' 0 r..8 .,0 ~ (]3 ..... -~' © c, o~ © bJ~l' x ~ C, 0 ,3 0 IJ') I~1 13- r.-. q:) r- U 03 L 0 n I -0 c U ~C U ~j 4J O~ c ~J .c II 0 4.1 0 t-- APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer March 26, 1991 City Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy as proposed by Staff which provides safety, liquidity and yield for City funds. DISCUSSION: The California legislature has passed legislation imposing a State-mandated local program requiring the treasurer or chief fiscal officer to render an annual statement of investment policy to the legislative body of the local agency and to render a monthly report containing specified information regarding investments and deposits to the chief executive officer and the legislative body of the local agency. The Treasurer's Statement of Investment Policy, as presented herein, is in conformity with the State requirements and guidelines established by the California Municipal Treasurer's Association, the California Society of Municipal Treasurer's Association, and the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers. The monthly investment report is placed on the agenda each month. The legislated authority of the Fund is included in Sections 53601, 53635, 53638, 53646, 53652, and 53653 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum parameters of the Investment Fund. FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None Proposed Investment Policy, Government Code Sections 53601, 53635, 53638, 53646, 53652 and 53653 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY INTRODUCTION The investment policies and practices of the City of Temecula are based upon State law and prudent money management. The primary goals of these policies are: 1. To protect the principal monies entrusted to this office. To provide sufficient liquidity to meet normal operating and unexpected expenditures. To assure compliance with all Federal, State, and Local laws governing the investment of monies under the control of the City Treasurer. To generate a maximum amount of investment income within the parameters of prudent risk management and consistent with the above policies. The monies entrusted to the City Treasurer (referred to as the "Fund" throughout the remainder of this document) will be invested, administered, and reported in a timely and prudent manner. The City Treasurer and staff will observe, review, and react to changing conditions that effect the fund. The authority to execute investment transactions that will effect the Fund will be limited to: City Treasurer Finance Officer The above officers will meet on a regular basis with the City Manager to discuss the current market conditions, future trends, and to plan investment strategy to meet the City's fiscal objectives. The policy stated below will also address risk management because it is such an integral part of the investment policy. To concentrate only on maximizing return would be dangerous; therefore, policy issues will be directed to: 1. Limiting the Fund's exposure to each issue and issuer of debt; and Determining a minimum credit requirement that firms must have in order to hold City money. CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY SCOPE In accordance with Ordinance No. 90-2 of the City Council of the City of Temecula and as prescribed by Section 41000 through 41007 of the Government Code of the State, the City Treasurer is responsible for investing the unexpended cash in the City Treasury. OBJECTIVES A. Safety of Princioal Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the City of Temecula. Each investment transaction shall seek to ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether from securities default, broker-dealer default, or erosion of market value. The City shall seek to preserve principal by mitigating the two types of risk: credit risk and market risk. Credit Risk. Credit risk, defined as the risk of loss due to failure of the issuer of a security, shall be mitigated by investing only with issuers whose financial strength and reputation can be verified to be the highest as rated by nationally known rating agencies (see Section VI for detailed limitations on credit risk), and by diversifying the investment portfolio so that the failure of any one issuer would not unduly harm the City's cash flow. Market Risk. Market risk, the risk of the market value fluctuations due to overall changes in the general level of interest rates, shall be mitigated by (a) structuring the portfolio so that securities mature earlier than or concurrent with the timing of major cash outflows, thus eliminating the need to sell securities prior to their maturity; (b) prohibiting the use of leverage and margin accounts; and (c) prohibiting the taking of short positions--that is, selling securities which the City does not own. It is explicitly recognized herein, however, that in a diversified portfolio, occasional measured loses are inevitable, and must be considered within the context of the overall investment return. Return on Investment The City's investment portfolio shall be designed to attain a market-average rate of return through economic cycles. The market-average rate of return is defined as the average return on three-month U.S. Treasury bills. Whenever possible, and consistent with risk limitations, as defined herein, and prudent investment principles, the Treasurer shall seek to augment returns above the market average rate of return. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY III IV V VI SAFEKEEPING OF SECURITIES To protect against potential losses by collapse of individual securities dealers, all securities owned by the City, including collateral on repurchase agreements, shall be held in safekeeping by a third party bank trust department, acting as agent for the City under the terms of a custody agreement executed by the bank and by the City. All securities will be received and delivered using standard delivery versus payment procedures, i.e., the City's safekeeping agent will only release payment for a security after the security has been properly delivered. REPORTING Under provisions of Section 53646 of the California Government Code (attached), the City Treasurer shall render a monthly report to the City Manager and City Council showing the type of investment, issuing institution, selling institution, date of maturity, amount of deposit, current market value for all securities with a maturity of more that 12 months, return on the City's investment portfolio expressed as an annual percentage rate, yield to maturity, cash flow information demonstrating that the City can meet its upcoming financial obligations, and such data as may be required by the City Council. The report shall also state its relationship to this statement of investment policy, as directed under the Code. The treasurer shall annually submit an investment report and a recommended updated Investment Policy to be reviewed and approved by Council. QUALIFIED DEALERS The City shall transact investments only with banks, savings and loans, investment security dealers and the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund. The dealers must be primary dealers regularly reporting to the New York Federal Reserve Bank. Exceptions to this rule will be made only after thorough research and documented confirmation of financial strength and reputation and after approval by the City Council. Investment staff shall investigate dealers who wish to do business with the City in order to determine if they are adequately capitalized, make markets in securities.appropriate to the City's needs, and are recommended by managers of portfolios like the City's. The City shall at least annually send a copy of the current investment policy to all dealers approved to do business with the City. Confirmation of receipt of this policy shall be considered as evidence that the dealer understands the City's investment policies, and intends to show the City only appropriate investments. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Generally, investments shall be made in the context of the "prudent investor" rule, which states that: "Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion, CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." The City is further governed by the California Government Code, Sections 53600 et seq (attached. Within the context of these limitations, the following investments are authorized, as further limited herein: United States Treasury Bills, Bonds, and Notes. or those for which the full faith and credit of the United States are oledged for payment of orincioal and interest. There is no limitation as to the percentage of the portfolio which can be invested in this category. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. Obligations issued by the Government National MortQage Association (GNMA), the Federal Farm Credit Bank SYstem (FFCB), the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLB), and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). Although there is no percentage limitation on the dollar amount that can be invested in these issues, the "prudent investor" rule shall apply for a single agency name. Maturity is not to exceed the projected dates of the City's cash needs or five years, whichever is less. Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank, otherwise known as banker's acceotances. Banker's acceptances purchased may not exceed 270 days to maturity or 40% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in banker's acceptances issued by any one bank. Commercial DaDer ranked "P1" by Moodv's Investor Services and "A1 +" by Standard and Poor's. and issued bv a domestic corporation having assets in excess of $500,000,000 and havin(~ an "A" or better rating on its long-term debentures as Drovided by Moodv's or Standard and Poor's. Purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 15% of the market value of the portfolio. No more than 10% of the market value of the portfolio may be invested in commercial paper issued by any one corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation. The City may invest in no more than 10% of a single corporation's commercial paper. Maturity is not to exceed 180 days. Negotiable certificates of deoosit issued by nationally or state-chartered bank or a state or federal savings and loan association. Negotiable certificates of deposit (NCDs) differ from other certificates of deposit by their deposit liquidity. They are issued against funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn specified or variable rates of interest. NCDs are traded actively in secondary markets. When feasible, an independent trading service will be used as part of the evaluation process. If a rating service is used, the financial institution should maintain a rating equivalent to Keefe Bank Watch Service of "A/B" or better. To be eligible for purchase by the City, the NCD must be issued by: 4 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY Fo Ge A California bank rated "A/B" or better by the rating service of Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, (Keefe) or equivalent); A major national or regional bank outside of California rated "B" or better by Keefe, (or equivalent); A domestic branch of foreign bank ("Yankee") rated I for country rating, II or better for peer-group rating, and II or better for dollar access by Keefe; or A savings and loan association operating in California rated "A/B" or better by Keefe. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section II-A-2 of this policy, the maturity of bank NCDs shall not exceed two years; the maturity of savings and loan association NCDs shall not exceed two years. Transactions in NCDs shall not collectively exceed 30% of the total portfolio in effect immediately after any such investment is made. Repurchase Agreements. The City may invest in repurchase agreements with banks and dealers with which the City has entered into a master repurchase agreement which specifies terms and conditions of repurchase agreements. Transactions shall be limited to the primary dealers and the top banking institutions according to the rating agency based on liquidity, profitability, and financial strength. The maturity of repurchase agreements shall not exceed 30 days. The market value of securities used as collateral for repurchase agreements shall be monitored daily by the investment staff and will not be allowed to fall below 100% of the value of the repurchase agreement plus the value of collateral in excess of the value of the repurchase agreement (haircut). In order to conform with provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Code which provide for the liquidation of securities held as collateral for repurchase agreements, the only securities acceptable as collateral shall be certificates of deposit, eligible bankers' acceptances, or securities that are direct obligations of, or that are fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency of the United States. No more than 50% of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase agreements, and a "perfected security interest" shall always be maintained in the securities subject to a repurchase agreement. Local Agency Investment Fund. The City may invest in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) established by the State Treasurer for the benefit of local agencies up to the maximum permitted by State law. Time Deposits. The City may invest in non-negotiable time deposits collateralized in accordance with the California Government Code (attached), in those banks and savings and loan associations which meet the requirements 5 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY VII VIII IX for investment in negotiable certificates of deposit. Since time deposits are not liquid, no more than 15% of the portfolio may be invested in this category. The issuer firm should have been in existence for at least five years. The City may waive the first 100,000 of collateral security for such deposits if the institution is insured pursuant to federal law. In order to security the uninsured portions of such deposits, an institution shall maintain at least 10% in excess of the total amount deposited. Real estate mortgages may not be accepted as collateral. The maximum term for deposits shall be one year. In general, the issuer must have a minimum 6% net worth to assets ratio or the minimum ratio established by the Comptroller of the Currency. The issuer's operation must have been profitable during their last reporting period. Money Market Funds. Investing solely in U.S. treasuries, obligations of the U.S. Treasury, and repurchase agreements relating to such treasury obligations. To be eligible, these companies must have an investment advisor with not less than five years experience and that is registered with the SEC, has the highest ranking available as evaluated by a nationally recognized rating service, and with assets in excess of $500 million. Ineligible Investments. Investments not described herein, including, but not limited to, reverse repurchase agreements, mutual funds, zero coupon bonds, mortgage backed securities, common stocks and corporate notes and bonds are prohibited from use in this portfolio. SWAPPING OF SECURITIES A swap is the movement from one security to another and may be done for a variety of reasons, such as to increase yield, lengthen or shorten maturities, to take a profit, or to increase investment quality. The purchase transaction and the sale transaction must each be recorded separately and any losses or gains on the sale must be recorded. PORTFOLIO ADJUSTMENTS Should an investment percentage-of-portfolio limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses. When no loss is indicated, the Treasurer shall consider reconstructing the portfolio basing his decision, in part, on the expected length of time the portfolio will be unbalanced. POLICY REVIEW This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to insure its consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity, and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic trends. The City Council shall be responsible for maintaining guidance over this investment policy to insure that the City can adapt readily to changing market conditions, and shall approve any modification to the investment policy prior to implementation. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA INVESTMENT POLICY STATE LAW The legislated authority of the Fund is covered in Sections 53601, 53635, 53638, 53646, 53652 and 53653 of the Government Code. Enclosed are copies of the statutes which determine the maximum parameters of the Fund. It is the policy of the City Treasurer to comply with the State laws governing the Fund. CODE § 53601 A.R~CLE1. ~OF SURPLUS § 53600. Local alehey, definition · A~ used in this article, *'local arency'* means county, city, city and county, incJudEa· a chartered city or co~nry, school district, community college dieU-ice, public dis~ct, county boant of education, county superintendent of schools, or any public or mama. 'capel corporation. (Amended by Stat~.1984, e. 1Li, § 2; Stats. 1984, c. 1226, § l; St, tte.1987, c. 827, § 2.) { 53601. Circunu~nces authorlain{ investments: authorized investments The legislative body of a local asenc'/h&vins money in a sinking fund of, or surplus money in, its ~re~sury not required for the immediate necessities of the local a~ency may invest any portion of ~e money which it deem wise or expedient in: (a) Bonds issued by the local aEency, inc]edEns bonds payable sole!y out of the revenues from rvvenue-producinE property owned, controlled, or operated by the iocll tEency or by a department, board. aEency, or authority of the local (b) United Sta~es Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or cer'ifi~Ms of indebtedness, or :hose ~or which the faith and cre~iit of the' United St~t~s are piedEed for the payment of principal and in~erest. (c) Registered sU3ts warrant~ be; trea.sury name 'or bonds of this state, incindia· bon~. payable solely out of the revenues from z revenue-producins property owned, controlled, or opera~.d by ~he 's~e or by a department, bc. trd, agency, or a~:thority of the st~. ' ~:' id) Bonds, not~s, wan*ann, or other evidences of indebtedness of ~y Ioc~! agency* ~=~.in this /~Late, incladEn· bonds payable solely out of the revenues fr~m a revenue-produ'ci.-,S propera.' owned. con~rolled, or oper~ted by the local agency, or by a deparnnent, haL=d, aEancT, or authori~ of ~e (e) Oblige'ions issued by banks for cooperatives, federal ¼nd banks, federal intermediate credit banks, federal home loan banks, the Federal Home Lo&u Bank Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, or in ablE.tie·s, p&r~icipttious, or other instruments of, or issued by, or fully i',~rsnteed as to principal and interest by, the Federal Natiormi Mafia'bee Anoci~tion; or in rueranteed .Don!on· of Small Business AdmanEau'arian notes; or in oblate·ions, participations, or other instruments of, or '~sued by, a fethr~l'eiency or I United SUMs ~overnment*spousored enterprise. =, (f) B~ls of exchanfe or time drifts drawn on and accepted by · commercial bank, otherwise known :a~ bakers eccepunces, which are elastic for pureaisc by,the Peder~l Reserve System. Purchases 'of' beakers ~ccept~nces may not exceed 270 this maturity or 40 percent of the aSency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 30 percent of the asency'a surplus funds may be in-cared in ~ b~nkera acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this s~ction* This subdivision does not preclude · municipal utility district f~om investins any surplus money in its treesury Jn say manner authorized by the Municipal UU'lity Distrh:t Act, Division 6 (commencing with Section 11501) of the Pvblic Utilitbs Code. . · ~) Commercial paper of "prime" quality _of. the bE·heat ~'anking or of the hi·hut :et~r and numeric~ rating ss provided for by Moody s Investors Service, Inc, or Standard and Poor's C~rporotion. EliSable paper is further limited to issuing corporations tint are orr~ized operagag within the United SteMs and having total mete in excm of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000) and havinE an *'A" or hitalter re·ins for the issuer's debt, other th&n commercial paper, if any, as provided for by Moody's Investon Service, Inc., or Stnndm~ and Poor's PUrchases of eligible commafrei i~per may not exceed 180 days maturity nor repruent more 10 pc'cent of the outst. andins palMr of aa lbs·inS corporation. Perch&tea of commercial palMr may not. exceed 15 percent of the ·Eenc'/s surplus money which n~y be invest~t per·usa· to this section. Asiarinks * ° * Indfc-t· dote·form by amendment '" 89 § 53601 ~OV~I~I~IF.,~ CODE An additional 15 ~ or · ~ of 30 ~nt of ~e a~e~'s s~l~ money, ~y ~ ~v~d ~ ave~ ~m~ of ~e en~ ~o~t d~s not ~c~ 31 ~ys. "Dol~weJ~h~ ave~e mat~' me~s ~e sum of ~e ~ount of e~ ou~n~ mmme~l pa~r ~vu~ent mul~pli~ ~) Nefo2~ble ce~s of de~si~ ~u~ by a ~!!y or ~~ b~k or 8 s~ or fede~l m~iz~on (M de~ by ~on 5102 of ~e F~c~ ~e) or by a sm~lice~ b~n~ of a forei~ b~ ~es of ne~o~ble ce~ of de~sit my not ~c~ 30 w~ent arenas s~l~ money whi~ may ~ hvuMd p~t m ~h ~on. For p~su of s~go~ nefo2able ce~fi~ of de~si~ do not ~me ~h ~cle 2 (~mmen~ ~ ~on ~0) of ChapMr 4 of P~ 1 of Di~ion 2 of ~fie 5, ~ce~ ~t ~e mount so subj~ ~ ~e ~i~ons of S~on M~. au~o~ by ~h s~on, ~ IonE ~ ~e p~ of ~e ~v~e ~p~h~e a~ment ~ ~vesMd solely ~ supplement ~e ~come no~y ~eiv~ f~m ~m s~g~ Invu~ent ~pu~ a~ement shall ~ made only u~n p~or app~v~ of ~e b~hfive ~y of ~e i~l aEency. For pu~ses of ~h s~on, ~e ~ "repu~ I~m~' m~ a p~ne of s~ by ~e l~l afency pu~u~t ~ an a~Hment by wh~ ~e seller ~l ~p~hMe ~e s~un~es on or hfo~ a s~c~ied dam and for a s~ed mount ~d ~ll deliver ~e underlie sec~ ~ ~e I~ afency by ~k end, physi~i deliver, or by ~-~ ~ a~menk ~e ~fer of underline s~es ~ ~e ~unM~a~ b~k's ~r ~k~ account may be us~ for ~k~n~ deliver. ~e ~ "~M~" for ~e p~u of ~h su~J~ion, me~s ~e o~ p~ m ~e ~n~gon. A ~un~ b~'s ~ dep~ent or ~fekHp~ dep~ent may ~ us~ for physi~l deBve~ of ~e ~d~l~E ~. ~e a~men~ shall be for one ye~ or less. %e ~ "s~u," for p~se of ~p~e under ~e ~ "revere ~pu~e a~ment" m~ a slle of ~es by ~e ]~ aKen~ p~uant ~ ~ ~ment by whi~ ~e I~ a~en~ ~li rep~e su~ s~es on or ~fo~ a s~fied da~ and for 2 s~ed S~s or any s~ and oue~n~ ~in ~e Uni~ S~s. NoMs e~ble for inv~ent under sub~sion sh~ ~ ~d m a ~ ~M~ of "A" or i~ ~alent or be~r by I na~onally ~o~ ~2nE se~ce. P~es of m~um-~ ' * ' no~ may not ~c~ ~) Sh~ of ~nefi~ ~M~st ~u~ by dive~ mnt~m~t ~m~, ~ d~m~ h Scion ~701m of ~e Revenue and Tmgon ~e, hvu~K ~ ~e ~ ud ob~M M au~o~ed or ~e. MEhut Je~ ~d nummi ~f ~d~ by not ~ ~u ~o of ~e ~ latest ~qe~t h ex~ of five h~ ~n doi~ (~,~,~). ~e ~e ~ce of ~s of hv~ puget ~ ~ ~ p~ ~ law, mone~ h~ by a ~ ~ ~ afent ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ent or ~U of ~ or o~ hdeb~m, or ~ii~M und~ a l~, ~ent rile, or o~ a~ment of 9~e of ~f l~ sfen~ de~u ~vhr a m~ket v~ue at but ~u~ M ~at ~ by 90 GO~EI~NTCODE § 53601.1 Section ~652 for the 0m'~ose of secu~n~ Io4~1 .en. de~i~. ~e s~ se~nr u ~11ate~l shall ~ olac~ by delive~ or ~k en~ into ~e ~y o~ z ~c comfy or ~e ~c de~en~ of i bin~ which h no~ re~Ja~ons z~li~ble 74~, 0 l: S~U.I9~, c. 9~, J ~4, eft. bp~ ~, 19~; SU~19~,-~ 9~, J 15, eft. bp~ ~, 1985, lfi3 Lap~cfoL Amendment of'this ,-.*tion by f~ted LO become o~rmve uudff the pfm, UMns of J 5 of that Act* Amendment of' thh section by J t of Suu. lgtl, p- 567, fz~led to bu:ome opemUve uncLu' the pmvis~xu of J 3 of £ff~'~ of u~enclment of s~'~ion by two or more KU tt the same session Of' the ~i.slalul*L j 96~. 1984 Lerblition Amen-ment of LI~ s~-~iofi by SLw. 1914, c- 659, ! 2. enntmlent ujx~n zppn~aJ of A. CA. op~zci. -hen A.('~. No. 2] (1984) ,in Ipproved st the ptimiry f. Jeccin~ held $uae 3. 1913. S~JO. 12 O; $~ILLIgP. = 639. provided: '~(cfiofiJ 2. ro 9. iKlus~vp- of this =t ~hAXI become olay'aLive upon thc mnenclmen~ of subdivision ('o) of Scion ] ] of Ar*,~clc } l of the CaJ~.ror~a Co~stitu,;on [A.C.A. No, 21 (19~) not v~(,.,4 U~a in |9~] outh~g t~re to provic~c for the dL'lX~it of public mo~-ys in an}, fedr&l or state credit union in this st-t-" 19M L~rblition · Amendment of this section by 932. r~od to bernroe opnti. un~r of that Act.' ' Amendmen~ of this ztinn 985, r-~ed to become ovm'~. udcr the · . lJiti L.pslation. AJnendmnt of this Mrtioa by J I.S of SlaLL !fi6. c. failed m b~u~ Mtive und~ the proq~iiau M* j 5 of · AmndmcK of d~is I:sion by h $ of Stand916, p- 853, Im~46m: '*S~ctiom IJ and 2.5 of this bill incs~x~ue Irnendments to Sm:~n J3601 of the Gownmere r__,y~__ propreed by bQth this W and AB 2.595 (S~KLIPIk p- 7~). bc..bu 3.5 and 4.5 of this W boob·m. u~,dmenu ~ S,crine 5363~ of s~-fions shaft ·My tmmm~ M~vt ~; (3) ~ W h ~ ~ff ~ ~95. h p~s ~ J 6 ~ S~ 1987. c 117. the ~ ~ ~ by $M~I~. ~ 741, ~ I~ I; S~!9~ ~ 853* J I; S~191~ c J~ I. 19~ m w~ ~ tM mt ~ h&ib. L GP, J ~ Su~lOlS, ~ 982, § S3601.1. Investment in finucial futures or flnanclaJ option contrKts The authority of · local qenc7 ~o invest funds pursuant to bction ~S,~0! includes, in eddition the·to, authority ~o invest in finlncis3 futuru or financ~i .option eontruta in uy of the investment cztqor~es enumernted in 0u~ section. (Added by SLtts.1983, c. ~4, J 3.) Asterfsk· * · · Indlc~te riMeif·rio by amendment 9]. § 53601.5 GO~ERA'MF..~T CODE § 5360L5. Invemnen~ qu~ified purchue agent The purcl~ue by I local agency of any invest~nent authorized pursuant m Section ~3601 or 53601.1, not purcJ~sed db~c~ly from the issuer, shall be purchued either from an bxs~i~u~on licensed by the s~ u · broker-dealer, u defined in Sec~on 25004 of the ~orpora~ions ~le, or from a member of a federally r~rulz~ed secuHLies exchange, ~'om · nag~on~J or s~uM-chL'~ar~i benJr~ from 8 federal or s~a~ usoc~on (u defified by Set, on 5102 of the Finzncial Cede) or from a brokerage g'Lrm desirnat~f u · pr~mar~ government dealer by ~e Federal Reserve hank. (Added by Stun.1984, c. 929, § 1. Amended by S~a~s.l.085, c. 983, § 16, ur~cy, eft. Sept. 26, 198~.) § 53602. Investment in !ertl inves~ne~nts for savinp banks: securiUes of public diOracts Admia~u-acive Code Re~ermom ~on~ra~ pm~ods. m 2 ~aI.Adm. Gode 599.g, J3. ' lnvaunmL% s~e 2 ~.Adm.~ S99.942. § 53602.1. Heating oil, crude oil. or guoUne futures: eu~orinUon of investJnent by Southern ~alifornia R&pid ?ransit Dis~c~ re~ dragon of ~on. C~l~o~iz ~pid T~i~ D~ when ~e ~c~ hu money ~ a s~g f~d of, or s~l~ money ~, iu ~eu~ not ~u~d ~or ~e imm~ n~sifies o~ ~e ~c~ My invest ~at ~on o~ · e money whi~ i~ de~ines m ~ ~e ~d ~ent ~ fu~ con~c~ ~ h~g oil,'c~de o~. or guol~e on ~e ~ew York Me~e ~nge. s~on on any inves~en~ made p~ut m su~vhion (t). .. (c) ~is sec~on shall rem~n ~ eff~t only un~l Janu~ 1, 1989, and shall hv~ no ~o~e or effect on or afar ~a~ ~r~, ~less a h~r ena~d s~M, which h antrod ~fore J~ua~ 1, 1~89, dele~ ~e ieghla~ve ~dy o~ I 1~ agency may de~i~ got ~ekHp~g ~ a ~e~l or s~' ~soch~on (n defined by ~on SI02 o~ ~e F~! ~e), 8 ~ ~m~y or a sMM oF na~o~l · bank 1o~d wi~ ~m sum or ~ ~e F~ Rexe~e ~ og ~ ~ or an~ b~nch o~er e~dencu o~ indebMdnm h w~ ~e money og ~e i~ agen~ b hvu~ p~un~ ~ ~b s~ekeeping ~ b ~ie~ by ~e b~h~e ~y M ~ ~r of ~e ~ ag~ ~e A,RTICI,E 2. DEPOSIT OF FUNDS · Section 5363?.5. 53635.5. 63635.6. 63648.5. 53651~.. 53651.4. Classes of In vest~n,nt. ts°c~ri~' [e~'dep°sitS' purchase agent. Ino~ve. Te~a~on of ~t ~ ~bJe s~. s~M ben~ n~ ~ f~. 92 § 53632.5 § 53632.5. Ciaase. s of security for deposits There are three classes of security. for depositr (a) Secu.Hties described in subdivision (m) of Section 53651. re) Securities desc~'bed in Subdivision (D) of Section 53651. GOVERNMENT CO.DE (c) Secu.Htias enumerated in Section ~3651, except for those descn'bed in subdivisions (m) and (p} of thai; sec~on. .. (Added by Stats.1983, c. 105, § 2. Amended by Stats.1986, c. 1132, J 2.) § 53633. Determination of amounts to be deposited in each class " The U-.asurer shall determine'the amounts of money to b~ deposited as Luact~ve, active interest. bearing active deposits, except as otherwise provided in Section 53679. (Amended by Stats.1983, c. 105, § 3.) § 53635. Funds of local qenc~ deposit or investment Az far as poas~ie, all money belonrinf to, or in the custody of, a local aeency, including money paid to the treasurer or ot%er §filch] to pay the principal, Luterut, or penalOes of bonds, sh~11 be deposi~-d for srfekeepinK in sute or national banks, savings associations or federal associations or credit u~orm in this state selected by the trtssuror or other official having tht !oral custody of the money;, or, unless otherwise d~-ected by the ierislative body pursuant to Section 53601, may be invested in the following: . (a) Bonds issued by the local agency, including bonds payable sol·IT out or the revenues from revenue-producing propercy owned, conu, olled, or operated by the local agency or by ·deparcment, boLrd, agency, or authority of the local agency. fo) United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills, or certificates of indsbt~iness, or those for which the faith and credi~ of the United States are pledged for the payment of. principal and Luterest. (c) Registered State warrants or treasury notes or bonds of th~s state, including bonds payable solely ou~ of the revenues from a reven~e*prod~cing prop·try owned, controlled, or operated by the s~ate or by · depL"~nent, bold, agency, or authoricy c! the state. (d) Bonds, notes, warrants, or other evidences of indebteduess of an~ iocal agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from · revenue*producing propercy owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency, or by · department, board, ·gency, or authoricy of the local agency. (el Obli~tions issued by banks for cooperatives, federal land banks, federal intermediate b~ks,..fedsral ho.m. e loan banks, the Federal Home _Loan Bank, the Term·nee Valley Authoricy, or in obh~auons, l:aruc~pations, or other inst.-~ments of, or issued by, or fully ruarante~cl ns to principal and in·arts· by, the Federal National Mot·rage Association; or in ~mranteed portions o! Small Business Administration.notes; or in §blared§ns, partampa·ions, or other Lus=uments of, or issued by, federal agency or a United States government*sponsored enterprise. (f) Bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by · coremarchi bank, otherwise known as bankers a~ceptances. which are alisahie for putcams· by the Federal Reserve Systam. Purchases of bankers tcceptuces may not exceed 270 days maturicy or 40 percent of the ·goncy's surplus funds which may be Lurested pur~&nt to this section. However, no moro than 30 percent of the apncy's surplus funds may be invested in the bankers anceptancns of any one commercial bank pursuant te this s~ction. · This $u~.* ion dons not prt~iuds · municipal uffiicy district from investing any surplus money in ,~.?'~u,. ~.u~ m...an.y...ma.n~..er_au.~..ori..n~l...by ~e .Municipal Utility Dlst...i~ Act, Division 6 (comrnancing (g) Comearchi paper of "primo" quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and numerk~l rat4ng u provided for by Moody's Investors Service. Inc, or SLtndard and Poor's Corporation. Elig~le paper is further limited to issuing corporations that are organized and oporaUng w~thin the United States and laving total mots in ere·as of five hundred million dollars (L~0,000,000) and htv~ng tn "A" or higher rating for the inuer's debt. other th~n commercial paper, i~ any, ns provided for by Moody's Investors Servk:e. Inc., or St&ndard Ind Poor's Corporation. Parch&sea of ei]s~le com_merchi paper may not exceed 180 days maturity nor represent more than Underline Indicates change~ or 8gMitfono by amendment 94 GOYER~N~ENT COD~ § 53635 10 percent of the outstanding pzper of ~n issuing corporation. Pm-d~ses of commercial l~per nu~y not exceed 15 percent of the ·gency's surplus money which may be invest·el pursuant to Lhis section. An ·dclit. ional 15 percent, or · totnJ of 30 percent of the agency's money or money in its custody, may be invested puz'su~nt to this subdivision. The additional 15 percent n~y be so invested only Lf the dollix-weighted average maturity of the entice ·mount does not exceed 3! days. "Doller-weighted average maturity" means the sum of the ·mount of ench outstanding commercial piper investment multiplied by the number of days t~ maturity, divided by the total amount of outstanding commercial paper. (h) Negotiable cerhfica~es of deposit issued by a nationlily or state-chaItered bank or · savin~ association or federal a.tsociation or a state or federei credit union or by · ·tats. licensed branch of · foreig~ bank. Purc.~eses of negot~bl· certificates of deposit may not exceed 30 percent of the · gency's surplus money which may be invested pursuant to thi~ section. For purposes of this section, negotiable ceffificates of deposit do not come within Ar~cle 2 (commencing with Section 53630} of Chapmr 4 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title $, except that the amount so invested shall be subject to the limitations of Section &3633. For purpose· of this section, the lek~slat. ive body of · local agency having legal custody of the money are prohibited from depositing or investing local agency funds, or funds in the custody of the local agency, in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by · st. am or federal credit union if a member of the legislative body of the local agency, or an emp!Gyee of the administrative officer. manager's office, budget office, auditor-controller's office, or treasurer's office of the local agency also serves on the board of directors, or any committee appointed by [he board of directors, or the credit committee or supe~wisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the negotiable corv. ificates of deposit= (~ Investments in repurchase ·greement~ or reverse repu~ agreements of any securities authorized by this section, so long as the proceeds of the reverse repurchase ·~reement are invested solely to supplement the income normnlly received from these securities. Investment in · revere repurchase agreement shall b~ made only upon prior approval of the legislative body of the local agency. For purposes of this section, the term "repurchase agreement" mss.as · purchase of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the seller will repurchase the sec~ri~es on or before a specified date and for a specified amount and will deliver the undeE.v'[ng securities to t2.e local agency by book ·naT, physical delivery, or by third.party custodial ·~reemen;. The transfer of undert}'ing securities to the counterparty. bank'· customer book entry ·ccoun~ may be used for book entry. delivery. The term "counterptrty" for the purposes of this subdivision, means the other party m the transaction. A counterptrty bank'· trnst department or safekeeping depeI~ment may be used for physical delivery of the underlyin~ security. The term of repurchase agreements shall be for one year or less. The term "securities," for purpose of rapureas· under this subdivision, shall mean securities of the ··me issuer, description, issue date, and menu, icy. · The term "ray·me repurchase agTesment" means · sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an as, re·men'. by which the incai agency will repurchase such securities on or before · specified date and for · specified an~unt. (j] Medium-term * · · nots~ o~ a maaimum of five },ears' maturity issued by corporations or~anized and operating within the United States or by de~osito~ institutions licensed b~ the United Stat~s or any state and o~eratinsr within the United States. Notes eligible for invesnnent under this subdivision shall be rated in · ra~n~ cat·toW of "A" or ito ~uiv~lent or better by · nationally recognized rating service. P~rchases of n~dium-term notes may not exceed ~0 percent of the · ~ncy's surplus money which may be invexted pursuant to this sootion. Or} Sherex of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies, as defined in Section 23'/01m of the Revenue and Taxation Code, investin$ in the securities sad oblit~ations as anthorized by subdivisions (a) to 00, inclusive, of this section and which comply w~th the investment · ' ' restrictions of this article and A~rtiele l e~ ' 'with Section L~00). To be eligible for mine·cut[ investment pursuant to this subdivision, t~ companies shall either:. {1} attain the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical retin[ provided by.not !ess than two of the three latest nstionally recoSmlsed rating services, or (2) have an investment adviser registerri with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not les~ time five ~ e~ence investing in the securities and obligations as ~uthorized by subdivisions (a) m (m), m~ive, of ~ section and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars (8500,000,000). The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased pursuant to this ·ubdivisinn ·hall not include any commission that these companies m~y charge and shall not exceed 1~ percent of the agency'· surplus money which may be invested pursuant to this section. 95 § 53635 GOY'ERA'ME~"CODE (!) NotEs, bon~; or other oblirttions which ire at all ~ s~u~ in~t ~ s~u~es of ~e ~ lis~ bv ~on ~1 u eli~ble s~ ~or ~e ~on ~652 ~or ~e pu~e o~ s~r l~l tfen~ de~iu. s~li ~ ~tac~ by deiive~ or ~k enc~ ~ ~e ~s~v o~ a ~s~ ~m~v or ~e ~s~ de~en~ of a bink which h not tffilh~ wi~ ~e bauer of ~e s~r~ oblifxbon, and shall ~ ~d m zcco~n~ M~ ~e ~menu of ~e Unifo~ ~mme~zi ~la~ons a~li~ble ~ ~e ~es of secun~es in which ~e s~ ~4~, ~ ~ S~.~9~, c 9~, j ~9, e~. Sep~ 26, ~9~; Suu.19~, S~.1986, c 7h, j 4, o~nfive J~ 1, 19~; S~.19~, c ~, J 3, ~f. bp~ ~7, 19~; Suu,1986, c. aM, J 4, o~nfive J~ 1, ~9~: S~u.1986, c ~, j ~5; S~19M, 19~: S~.~9~, c .6, j ~ S~u.19~, c ~, j S.5.) 19,83 LqbliffoL Amencbn,'nt of LI~s ML't~m by J ~5 ~S~1983, ~ 5~ ~d~t ~ thh ~ by J 2 ~ S~1983. ~ ~7. o~dve u~ the I~ ~ ~ 21 (19M) st ~ p~ ~ h~ Ju~ 3, 198~ of ~t ~ .. Ammdmm:t o(this Mctkm by J 4.~ O(SLBtLI986. r- 784, fu'bd to tramroe opmbw uder the pmvidom o;J tim Ac~ · * folk)tin; J J}601. "' 1987 unembumu ~ ~ Nctioe by r- 44& mid r- 887 8jv~ effect ~nd ineorW~ted in the form set forth in J 5.5 od' c. ll?. Ae mmembnau o~ this NEddin by J 3 o( SULL 1987. c. 887. hiled to bonNns ope~dv~ ~ d~ pmv~om ~J '*mendmint ~ ~ ranJoe by Sun. t984. r- 741. StroLl985. ~ 983. ! 19. Smu. 1985, c. 1526. J ~ Suu. 1086, c. 714, ! 3; SLm. 1986. ~. 133, J 3: Suu. 1986. c. $53. ! 3.S. mu · temporu~ proviskm and, by its own Iron& wm rqmtbd oa J~n. i. 1918. -, u, hJcb time Lht text ot~is ~ u ameu6ed by Suu. 1982, c. 567, J 2.J, md furthff wmmt~d be/ Sm~,1984, c. 639, J 4; Suu. 19u, c. 983. § 20:. Sun. t983. r- 1526. t 2..S: Suu. 1986. r- 784, J 4; SMu. 1986. r. 153, ! 4: SM,. L986. r- 84:3, J Sm~1987. r- ~ J 2~ S~1987, r- .aF;. J 3.$. Witor W dd'm or adl for fldsmp~on o( rd'mdb$ bouds, nqummNmu. m Wmor Cods J ~C64. Woeds md !qu~ms (Prm. F.d.) j S3635.S. Investmen·l; qu-lified purchme 8lent The purchue by · Io4nl sprit7 of In7 invuUnent authorized pursuut m Se~bn ~63S, not puRhued diroct~ from the issuer, sheJI b ~ either from an ~--Ut~tion iicen~td by the sutE u · broker-dealer. u d.fined in S,ction 2~M4 o! th. Corporotiom Cod,. or from · re,ruhr of a fdera]l~ rogult. ted socur~ties uchlr~, from I rational or smM-chartErod bank. fzom a sav~nl~ usocittion or I federsl ' ' ' aMochtion. or hm · brokerup firm duignttmi u · prima~ foreminent deahr by tim Foderal Reserve baak. (Added by Sut. t.1984, e. 929, I t Amended by Smts.198~, P. 080, I 21, ur~encT, eft. Sept, 26, 1983; Suts.1986, c. 1132, J 4.) 19H l~hLion. P- ~,~i or I,MS Im:tioB by ! U d'Smu. 1986. ~ 24L Former ! S3633.S, Bdded by Stm. i~Tl, & ~6. IL IS2T, hbd to INtoroe opmd'N under ,b ~ pnM- J 2. md &mended by Slat&1981. e. i?, p. I.~3, J 2L wu limm M' J 277 or thM A~. rtym~d by St~L1986. r. i132. J 3. Undertlfie indlc~teo cMnOeo or 8ddi~n· by 8mendmerit 96 GOYERA'ME~ ¢OD!~ § 53640 § 53635.L Inoperative § 53S37. Selection of depositary, interest The money shall b~ deposited in Any bank. sAv~nfs usociAdon or federal usochCion, or stat~ or federal craft union, ~ith the objec~ve of realizinK maximum return. consistent Mth prudent financial mAnqemenC. except ChAc money shall not bodeposiced in any st~e or federal credit union if A member of the leGslsr~ve body of A Iocll afenc~, or an employee of the adn~nisCrzgve office, mArm~er's office, budfee ofgce, audi~or-concruiler's office, or creuurar's africa of the local qenc,y, Also ser~es on Me board of direcu)rs. or any commiCMe AK~inted by the board of ciireccor3. or the credit committee or supery~so~ committee, of the sum or federal cr~it union. (Amended by $La~.1984, c- 669, § 5; Stats.1086, c. 1132, § 6.) 1984 Le~slsfion. Amendment o( Lhis Morion by Scao. 1984. r. 659, J 5. CO~lt~Sent UpOn IporovLI Of A.C..6.. No. 21 (1914). kcime opc~iive upOfi approval o~ A.C.A. No. 21 (1984) ai lhe primary ejection hid ]ue 2, 1986. 1986 Lqisladon. Amendmtnt o( this s~cdon by Stau. 1915, c. 982, J L~. was trimmed by Su,, 19S6. r. 1132. J J. 53638. Muimum deposits (A) The cieposiL shall noC exceed the shAreholder's ~quicy oir Any deposi~r~ bank. For the purposes of th~s subdivision. shAreholde~'s equity. shall be determined in a~-cerchnce w~th Section 118 of the F~ancial Code, but shall be dffmed ~ ~ciude ~pi~! no~ ~d deban~s. ~) ~e deposit sh~ not exceed ~e '~ of ~e net wo~ of ~y de~si~ ~ ~on or f~e~l uso~s~on, except ~zt de~si~ noc exce~E s ~ul o~ five h~o~and doi!~ ne~ wo~ o~ ~at de~i~, ~ su~ de~iu ~ ~ or s~ u ~ hi' law. (c) ~e decsit ~ ~e shin t~unU o~ any ~lagy ~ ~it union shall not ~xc~d ~e ~1 of ~e unimoa~ ~pi~l and su~lu of ~e ~it un~n. u de~ bY role at ~e ~mm~sion- er of ~o~bons. ~cepc ~c ~e de~si~ ~ any ~it u~on s~ 8~c h ~ ~ounc not exc~in~ five hunted ~ounnd riolira (~.~) My be ~de ~ ~e sh~ ~unu of ~c c~i~ uion 8~ ins~ or ~~ pu~usnc ~ ~n ~ of ~e ~uchi ~e or ~ ~ u '~u~ed by law. ~d~ b~ S~U. 19~, ~ ~, J 6; SUU. 1986, ~ 11~ J 8.) ~~J~ t~ W ~m o[ ~n~ money ~0. ~ ~ ~d o~ Except u otherwbe provided in Section 53682, the depository shall hanc0t, collect, and imy checks., ~'AfiS, ~ other achnp w~chout ccot to the ~ qenc% ' (Amended by St,ttLI983, c. 10S, J S; Stats.1986, e. 248, ~ 92.) Asterbko * · * §fidkate de~tfofia by amendment § 53641 Go~ CODE j 53641. lbceipt or other evidence of deposit · When money is deposited in · depositor~, the treasurer or other authorized official shall take preserve · receipt, cer'dficate of deposit, or other evidence of the deposit as he o.r sh.e req..u~s.. (Amended by $taU.1956, c. 248, § 93.) § 53643. Deposit by treesurer " The tn*easurer may deposit &ny paA o~e money ~ a~d u~n ~n ~e ~r ~d ~e density. ... (~) Ac~ve de~siu ~d h~st ~n .~ subj~ ~ ~~ u~n ~e de~d of ~e ~) I~c~ve de~si~ ~ subj~t ~ nonce of zt l~t ~ days bfo~ ~~. ' (Amended by S~U.19~, ~ 105, O 7.) § 53645. Interest. comput.~ion Interest sh~,ll be c:mputed by the de~osito~ on the ·refuge daily balances ell·he money on deposit, paid qual~erly end computed on · 360-d.iy basis. (Amended ~.y $tat. s.1986, c. 248, § 95.) . .;'..:' . . § 53646. Treasurer's reports and statemenu of invesunent policy .. . . ?~zt of section oper~tiw until Jan. l, 1551. ... :.. .. (~) The ~-e~surer or chief f,,c~l officer ' ' ' ahab annually render to the legislative'i)ody'o! the ]oc~! agency · ~tatemenc of invf~tment policy. : .. (~) The treuur~: or chief £~czl officer ·hall render i monthly r~rt to the chic/executive officer ·nd leg~Jlac~ve body ot the local agency ahowinl the C~PO of investment, institution, dato of · mount of deposit, current m~rket value for all aecurigl~ with · mJt~riCy of more than 12 months, rate of interest, ud auch dun as may be required by the I(K~J &lency. The monthly report shill specify in detail invesu~ents made pursuant to subdivision (~ of Section 53601, Section 53601.1, and subdivision (~ of Section 53635. (1) The monthly report shall state its relationship to the statement of investment policy. (2) In 'the monthly report, · subsidiary ledger of investments may be used in accordance with ace·prat accoun~in~ priceices. (3) The monthly re~or~ shall also include any information which the tre&turer or chief f'mmJ officer determines would demon··it· that the !ocli afencv's expenditure reouiremenu can be me~ in the foil·wine month. ¢4~ A school dis·ice is not required to render · monthly re~ort on ·nv of its funds in the custody of the county ere&surer. (c) This section ·hall remain in effect only tm~il Juuary 1. 1991, and as of that date is repealed. unless · later enacted statute, which is en~'Md before JanuaO' 1, 1991, deletes or e.~anda that date. I! that date is not deleted or extended, then, on and after January 1, 1991, pursuant to Se~ion 9611 of the Government Code, Secgon 53646 of the Government Code, as ·mended by Section 8 of Chapter 105 of the Statutes of 1983, shall have the same force and.effec~ as it this temporary provision had not been enacted. ' '(Amln~ed by Sea·.IOn, ~. 10S, ! 8; Sea. lOb, ~ 122S, ~ ~ SU. ts.'i9SS, c. ~S2S, J S.) .. For tfzt ·/feetie· opemt~'w Jan. ,', lP.~I, ~fe ~ ~;45, pnst.. Undertfr~ JfidJc~tes c~tngee or 8cJd~tfone by ·mefic~ment 98 ~ OV'~ P..NM~N~ CODI~ § 53648 1~4 L~gblatlon .. '1~ is tim in·rot of the Lqisl~m'~ that ~ ~ of ~ M~6. Statement by ~r showing nc~ in~t · . .. ~g o~aer of ~e i~ ~gengy, · s~meat ~ho~ng ~e ~mOunt og ~ ~t for e~h de~i~ for ~e (Amended by 5~.19~, ~ 1Q~, ~ 8.) ~ 53~7. Interfi~ praymen· in~ fu~d ln~t ~m~ on § 53647.5. Interest on b~il money on deposit ~ Ref~cm C.J.S. B~il §§ ~2, 53. · § 53648. Dope·iLs and cone'ace pursuant to federal la;r:(~r rule NoL~thsLincLing thLs L'~cle, the tTeuurer nuy depcmit moneys in, ~nd enter into contac*.· w~th, · st·t~ or ua~onzl bank, si, vinp usoehfion or federzl &uocht~on, or federal or state ~:edit union, · p~u-suant to · federal law or · ruJe of · federal depirtment or zgency ldopLid pursuant m the Law if the law or rule coaL'lieU w~th this LrficJe in rsruint~zJg the pawnee· of inLirest on deposiU of public moneys by any of the fol16winf: (a) Banks wMch Art Fede~ lbserve Symm members or whole dopelie L,~ imuzK[ by the Fedez~l Deposit Irare'anco Corporifio~ · ' · .' '('O) S~Yin~ usochtions or federal usecairns which era federaJ home loin beak members or whose deposits ere Luenrad by th~edmlJ hv~np end/.,o&n InsurAnce Coax)ration. (c) SuM or federaJ cr~t unions whose secoonLi *·re insured by the N·fforud Credit Union Share Insurance Fund or ruaAnt. cl by the Cilifornh Credit Union ShL-e GuAranty Con)oration or insured or ruerAnteed 1)ursuant to Set,on 14858 of the F~-dnchi Code. unJols · member of the let"isLst~ve body of · Jotul agency, or an employee of the edministr&tive office, mumlet's office, bedre· office, tuditor-controiler's office. or treuurar's off'F:e of the ~ efency, also serves on the board of cUrecaere, or 8ny comma·Me el)poinMd by the board of directors, or the credit committee or supervisory committee, of du sLiM or federal credJ'~ union. "(Amended by StaLL1984, c. 6.r)0, J 7; SlatLlOa6, f. 1;~32, J. 10.) ~ ,~meudnm~t of ~ n ~ bu. llS4. c. AS9, '! '7, :-'Gsminpm upcm apl~val ~ A.C.A./~. 21 (1914), barnre4 · A Y I d ~ ~ by Smu. l~l~. ~. 913. J 24. .r'optrlciw upM aM~ovai of A.C.A. He. 21 (1914) a U. m rq,mbd by S(m.i#6, c. 1132. J 9. · .4atedogs ' * * Indicate dole·Joes by lineedmont 99 GOVEP. I~TMENT CODE § (d) The depository ma! exercise, enforce, or w~ve any .ri~h~ gr~nted to it by the promksory note, mortg'age, or deed of trust. (el For purposes of thi~ ar~c.]e, the m~rket value of a prom/szory note ~'h/ch ~ an eligfble secu~t7 under sub~Uvision (m) of Section 53651, shall be determined in accordance with the regularions adopted by the ° ° ° Treuurer under I:m~'aph (2) of aubd/vision (m) of Sec~on 5~651, as the regulations and staccte were in effect on December'31, 1986. However, if and when reguJarioas on . the subject ar~ edopt~d by the adminhtrstor, the n~rket value shall be determined in accordance with those regularions of the edminisc~tor. (Added by StAts.1986, e- 1132, § 1S. Amended by Stato. 1987, e- 56, J 86.) § 53~51.4. Pepon of' Independent certified public accountont; depository usin~ eliKlble securi- ties~ state ba~k; national bank; fee (a) A depository which uses eli~ble securiries of the cl&u descn~Md in subdivision (m) of Section ~$51 shall, within 90 days after the close of each calendar year or within a longer Peried as the admin;~cr~tor may specify, file with the administrator a r~port of an indep~edent certified public accountant re~ardinE compliance with thLt a=~cle and with regulations end orders issued by the adminisL-acor under thh article with resl~-t co elii~)!e securities of that class. The report shall be based upon the auctit. shall contain the information, and shall be in the form the actminisu'acor may prescribe. ~ depository shall pro~--~e a copy of the report to the~.asuzer on request. (b) I! a depository which b a state hank fOes with the administrator, not less than O0 days before the bek~inninE of the calendar year, a norice that it elscan to ha examined by the s~L, nini~'trator insta~ of filin~ a report of an independent cer'c~ed public accountant under svbdiv~sion (a} for thac calendar year, the depository shall be ~empt from subdivision (a} for that c~lend~r year and shall for chit c~lenclar year be subject to examination by the edminisCretor rei~rdinr cornpile·cs w~th t.~s article a~d with reCuJa~ons and orders under thh article with respect to clip, is securiries of the class described in subdiv~ion (m) of Section 53551. The administr3tor shall pro~'ide a report to a ~rea~urer with de~osit~ in t~e examined st~e bank u~on rectaeat of the ~easurer. (e) A national bat~ may apply to the administrator to be e.v. zmined, and the a~ni~iscretor, in his or .her dhcrecion, may examine a n~tion*1 hank for the pur~ass of ntislynnE the requL~ments of sulxliv~sion (a). The administrator shall ~rov~ds a reoort to · ~reasurer with de~osit. s in the examined bation-~l bank upon reclues~ of the treasurer. (d) Whenever the adminhtntor examines a depository pursuant to Subdlvisio~ 0~} or (c)t the depository shall pay, within 30 days after receipt of i statement fTom.the adrnin~st~-ator, a fee of two hundred dollars ($200} per day for each examiner endfed in the examination. (Added by Stats.1986, e. 1132, § 16. Amended by Stata.198'r, e- 841, J 3.} §: M6~1.6. Letter of eredR; ternu · - (a) To be an elif3~le secu~ty under subdivision (p} of set,on s36~1, t letter of credit shall be in such form and shah sHat·in such prove·ions as the administrator may prucribe, &nd shall include eli of the foliowinE terms:. (1) The adminhU~cor shall be the benefichry of the.letter of credit. (2) The ktt~r of ersdit shall be dean end irTevocable sad sha]! provide that the administrstor may draw upon it up to the total amount in the event of the futura of the depository nv~nrs assochtion or federal &uoelatinn or if the depository serials ~uo~arion or federal &uoelarion refuses to permit the withdrsw~l of funds by a treasurer. (~.dded by Stats.1086, e- 1132, ! 17.) j 53652. Value rsqutred to seeufo active or Inactive depooit~, mark~'t valve .. · To secure active or inactive deposiu · depository shall at all rimes nmint~in with the aisnt of :.~pesitory elishie securities in see·rifles pools, pursuant to Sec~ons 536~6 and 535~8, in the nmoun~ s!~'ifJed in thia s~erion. Uncollected funds shall be ex~uded from the'amount dspesimi in the depository when determinin[ the secvritT requiremenu for the dspnsits. :'~.'ia) ~i~ie ·Scurries, exempt e~f~l. ~-~.s of the chms'dascrt~ in ·ub~U~bns (m) and of Section 536~, shll have 8 n~rket value of at hut 10 percent in excess of the total amount of all d..eposits of a depositor./secured by the ellrible ascuFit~es :".4~ 'e;fSka * · · In~licate deistforts by amefidment '".".' ~03 § 53652 OOVER~El~r CODE (b) ~i~%!e ~,~wi~ of.the ~ d~ ~ susa (m) of ~ ~I ~ We a ~ket ~elue at leu~ ~ ~nt ~ excm of ~e ~ ~un~ of ~1 ~iu d I de~ l~ by ~ose eli~ble s~u~es. (c) ~iw~le s~fi~ o~ ~e c~ du~ ~ su~ion ~) of ~n ~1 s~ We · ~ket value of ~t l~t 5 ~t h excm of ~e ~ ~out of ~.de~h of · d~M~. ~ by ~ose eli~!e s~fiu. For p~ ot ~ ~e, ~e ~rket v~ue of 8 b~ of ~it whi~ h · n eli~le sectS' ~d~ su~vbion ~) ~ ~n ~1 ~ b ~e ~out of ~ su~ ~ the le~r of ~it (Add~ by Smu.~986, ~ 11~, ~ ~9.) J ~. .. § 535.~3. Welver of securi~ .. When in his or her discretion local condition~ so warrant, the tztuurer u~y waive eecu.-ic~ for the ~ou of any dopesin ~s i~ insured pursuant to federuJ inw, notwithstanding t~s L'~cle. (Added by $t,tta.198~, e. 1132, § 21.) ' : .... ]986 ledslotion. I:hl. iva~b~ Poemar J $~S3. added by J:onua; 53652. mewhal by S'~.t~S~. c. 65~, ! t HtJ..p..X~, ! S. medal b~ S~u. 1084. re!3tinI to the r. tme sub.~t mattar. wal r~ed by SLtIL '" § 53z54..Addilion o: ~ubslilufion of s~cur~fies; withdr~w&l or ~j~tse or stcur~tjes.. (a) The de~sito~ m~.y ~dd ~ec~es ~o the ix~l or subi~tuu s~-ur~t~es ot ~uel ~lue for those in ~.%e ~::1 st ~n7 ~me, b :: ~h~i! no~. in~Fch~ie cl&ues of sicuric, Id d~f'med in by mo du!y authoriz.~ o~fice~ or. emDloyees of ~e depository who nlhfy the FequiFemen~s (~ The elena of delMsRory'is rupons~le' for ~he s~ekeepi~l &ud'disbursement of securities placed in i~s c~S~ly by I depository. It sjuli role&re securities only upon pFtse~Ll~on by the deposito~ c~ the most z~Son~bly cu~rext s*aMment of the ~1 deposRs aubjec~ ~o thh &Ftic]e held by the depository, suc.h eutOment ~o I~ ver~jed and counMrsiL~ed by mo duly nuthorized of~jceFs, other th&n those who *: ordered the withdriwel of secureLies. A copy of l~s slaMmerit siull be fore,led ~-"~e administ--sMr concur~ndy by the alent of depos~ry. (Amended by StOLLlo83, e. 10s, j 1~, Su~s.1086, c. ~1~% j wi~jr~,d o; · sscumy. sm :~ cal. A~bu. C?~__ 16003.3.2 ! ~3~4. Authorization for boldlnf of escurity by a~ent of depositor~, qents of depoeltor~ 8eeur~fJes subject to order of depo~itorT:, exception (8) At the time the traxsurer entm.~ into m contruce w~th the depexftory puz'&uant to Section 53649, ~,e or she shell nudmrize the nlext of depository d#irtutod by =he del.~o~itory, but inclu~nI the ITu~t de~L-~nent of the d~pository only when &ccepuble to both the trtuurer &rid the depository, to hold securities of r.~.e depository in -~__-~rthnce w~h this article to secure the deposit of the Joexl agent. (b) Only tho~e u. ust cmuMuies end tr~st de~rtmenU, or tJu Federal Home ~ Bank of San Francisco. which have be~n authorized by the administrator Imrsuant to Section 536~7 sh,Jl Ix euthorizec~ by Crexturers to act &t &reaLs of deltasleery. (c) The securities ~rt subject to order of the depository in -_____,--~Ance with'S4ction ~36S4 except when the prov~iord of subdivision (l~ of S~t~u S3661 and Section ~ ~rt in effect. (Amended by -etats. 1985, c. 113'2, J 23.) Underfine Indic~tes change~ or 8ddJtlono by amendment 104 ITEM NO. 5 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~--~-~ FIN C . OF IC .R CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer March 26, 1991 Rejection of Vehicle Bids RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council exercise the right to reject the bids received resulting in the invitation to bidders of February 21, 1991 (Bid Numbers 91- 0002, 91-0003, 91-0004, 91-0005). DISCUSSION: On February 21, 1991 invitations to bid were received by the City of Temecula. Subsequent to the closing date, it was determined the vehicle specifications contained in the invitations to bid required modification by both the City and Community Services District, consequently nullifying the bidding/purchasing process. New specifications have been reviewed and determined sufficient to meet the requirements of both City and Community Services District. The rejection of the above bids by the City Council is a formality so a new bid process can begin. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Bid Opening Log sheets with invitations to bid for Bid Numbers 91-0002, 91-0003, 91-0004 and 91-0005. BID OPENING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIFrlON: CITY OF TEMECULA BID OPENING LOG SHEET BIDDER: 3. BID AMOUNT BID BOND e 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager (1) Dated: 2\forms\bids\B-010 CITY OF TEMECUIA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME F s. 2/, -3 BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 3:00 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 30O0 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. CK20 9,5'] Make: ~ ~V/~OLE7' Uodel:'ql HXq ~,~__./dD[D CZ~ ~,~5 ~__.~ ~/~()P~ ~/t~7'~q Year: !c~q I Color: Unit Sale Bid Price: Sales Tax: $ I License: $ ~/~ PT' TOTAL: $ 1~,35"2, o~ Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Specifv delivery date after order received: Payment Terms .2 Pn /? ~ Company Submitting Bid: ~I~LIT~ Address: /5~ A~O ~ ~~. , Phone Number: ~1~ 7~.C- ~P)I ~ R~-~4' 7~1 Sales Manager (Printi: ~/~tP ~ Authorized Signature: ~~~- Remarks: ~'~--/' ~ ~ PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME 2-21-91 3 pm BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 3:00 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices indicated along with payment and discount terms. 4-wheel drive Make: CHEVROLET Model: CK20953 (91) Ext. Cab,long bed PER YOUR SPEC SHEET OR BETTER Year: 1991 Color: White must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be 3/4on Unit Sale Bid Price: $ 18108.91 Sales Tax: $ 1177.08 License: $ exemot TOTAL: $ 19285.99 6.5% Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Soecify delivery date after order received: 6o days Payment Terms with 15 days after delivery - no discounts Comoany Submitting Bid: SCHUMACHER AUTO SALES & LEASING Address: 28073 Dimz Romd. Temecula CA 92390 Phone Number: (714) 699-6633 Sales Manager (Print): Bern~l~ Sch~t)nacher Authorized Signature: Remarks: unit includes a factory chrome rear step bumper with tuber strip- which is as strong as a diamond plate bumper. However, diamond plate bumper can be included as a substitute at no additional costs. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION please see page 66 of the Manufacturers brochure. BID OPENING DATE: PROJECT DESCRIlrFION: CITY OF TEMECULA BID OPENING LOG SHEET BIDDER: BID AMOUNT BID BOND ~ t7~ ~'~, (o5 e e 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager (1) Dated: 2\ forma\bida\B--010 CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 3:30 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit orice. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. Make: C~/-/EX/~O/_~7- Model: 'c~],~Xq Year: / c~,/ Color: W I-/F/~ Unit Sale Bid Price: $ /.~;~(7°/~ .~O Sales Tax: $ I o,~.~ License: $ P'/,EAA FT TOTAL: $ 17, o,~l. q~ Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Soecify delivery date after order received: AP"~oX, Payment Terms ,,2°?~ Dtsco(,~T /'7 Company Submitting Bid: ~[,illl..cT~' ~/-,l~v12,r)/,~7'" Address: /,~-~O A_t~.' ~,~:'K 1A,/AY/V., F.S¢ONDI1)¢3, ('A . Phone Number: G1~~ 7~,'~ 7~.21., [..'~X~- Sales Manager (Print): '2~//C~ ~_ Authorized S~gnature' ~ Remarks: ' NeT 4 /~"cR Z~ ~/s~uoT-~, ~,7,,X I~, Pz~ .~ 7~x PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION CITY OF TEMECUI A 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME 2-21-91 3pro BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 3:30 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 300O 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. 3/4 ton 2-wheel drive Make: CHEVROLET Model: CC20953 Ext.Cab,long Bed ~ per your spec sheet O rL ~-,-]~=-~ · Year: 1991 Co~or: White / Unit Sale Bid Price: $ 16157.42 Sales Tax: $ 1050.23 License: $ exemot TOTAL: $ 17207,65 Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Specify delivery date after order received: 6o days Payment Terms within 15 days after delivery - nn Company Submitting Bid: SCHUMACHER AUTO SALES & I.EASTNG Address: 28073 Diaz Road. Temecula CA 92390 Phone Number: 699-6633 Sales Manager (Print): Be~'~d S~humacher Authorized Signature: /~t~J Remarks: unit includes a factory chrome rear step bumper with ruber strip- which is as strong as a diamond plate bumper. However,diamond plate bumper can be included as a substitute at no additional charme PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION please see page 66 of the Manufacturers brochure CITY OF TEMECULA ,~m oPmNo ~oo s~,rr P~O~ECT D~C~ION: ~/~ ~ BIDDER: ~- BID BOND 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager 2\farms\blds~,!LOlO CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME 2-21-91 2 pm BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 4:30 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit orice. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. 2-whee! drive, Make: CHEVROLET Model: CC20903 regular cab,lonl~ h~d PER YOUR SPEC SHEET O~l ~TF~ Year: 1991 Color: White Unit Sale Bid Price: $ 14995.97 Sales Tax: $ 974.74 License: $ exemp~ TOTAL: $ 15970.71 Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Specify delivery date after order received: 6o days Payment Terms within 15 days after delivery - nn di.qrn,mt~ Company Submitting Bid: SCHUMACHER AUTO SALES & LEASING Address: 28073 Diaz Road. Temecu]a CA 9?°,cK) Phone Number: 699-6633 Sales Manager (Print): ]~eFnd S~humacher Authorized Signature: /b'l.,bt~ / Remarks: unit includes/a factory chrome rear s~p h,,mp~r w~h ruber strip which is as stronm as a d~mmond p]m~ h~,mppr No,~ever,di~mend platc bumpcr can be included as a substitute at no additional costs PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION please see page 66 of the Manufacturers brochure CITY OF TEMECUIA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 4:30 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. Make: ('~V~OL~ Model:'¢~/.~X~ '~E4. CA~ ~/?'/y,J ~ ~ ~¢/C HP Year: /c/<7/ Color: Unit Sale Bid Price: $ /4 ~L/'00 Sales Tax: $ ol3 I. o~, License: $ TOTAL: $ !~. 2~. OG Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER A WARD OF BID Specify delivery date after order received: Payment Terms ,,2~ DI~_~u~JT- /7 Company Submitting Bid: . ~A!~T~ Address: /.~ AUto ~R~ W~., ~CoND!~ ,~. Phone Number: ~lq-7E~'~l ~ ~0~-~ -7~31 Sales Manager (Print): , ~/~. Authorized Signature' · Remarks: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION CITY OF TEMECULA BID OPENING LOG SHEET m~OaECT Di~SC~ZO~: ~/ ~- S~CJ B-O05 'i /" BIDDER: BID AMOUNT ~ t~z~l. 2..'/ BID BOND 13, I X'~. '~ :5- 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager (1) Signed: Dated: 2\forms\bids\B-010 CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME 2-21-91 2 pm BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 4 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. Mid-Size Extended cab Make: CHEVROLET Modek CS10653 Pick-up truck /~ per your spec sheet ~ ~T~ . Year: 1991 Color: White Unit Sale Bid Price: $ 12442.51 Sales Tax: $ 808.76 License: $ exempt TOTAL: $ 13251.27 Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF BID Soecifv delivery date after order received: 60 days Pavment Terms within 15 days After delivory - nn Company Submitting Bid: SCHUMACHER AUTO SALES & LEASING Address: 28073 Diaz Road, Temecula CA 92390 Phone Number: 699-6633 Sales Mana(~er (Print): Ser~ Sch~macher Authorized Signature: Remarks: price inclu~led 2 shoo manuR]s PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION see page 66 of the Manufacturers brochure CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 4 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit price. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. Make: ~' H ~q J~o/.E'/-' Model: 'ql Year: I c/9 1 Color: (.,uHI'T'~: Unit Sale Bid Price: $ Sales Tax: $ License: $ TOTAL: $ J/../~ I~'~ Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF BID SDecify delivery date after order received: Payment Terms ,2.~P,o Pw~u~'l"~ Comoany Submitting Bid: (~t~a~ Address: j~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~o~.D~ Phone Number: 4 ~ 9 -~-~/) ~-~- Sales Manager (Print):~~ ~. *u..o.ze. S,.n.tur.= Remarks: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA. 92390 BID SHEET BID DATE AND TIME BID DUE Thursday, February 21, 1991 at 4 o'clock DELIVER TO CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. BOX 3000 43172 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92390 Prices must be listed by individual unit orice. Available delivery date must be indicated along with payment and discount terms. c ~/oe~-~ Make: ~ N~qP..o/_E'/-- Model: '~'t ~-/0 g~7~ C/~E~.~ xq ?/c,~ U~ Year: ! ~/cl ~ Color: Unit Sale Bid Price: $ /Z~ Zql, Sales Tax: $ 795, License: $ TOTAL: $ I Please print or type the following information: DELIVERY TIME TO BE WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF BID Specify deliverv date after order received: Payment Terms ~ D~~ /7 Company Submitting Bid: _ d~u~t~ C~~ Address: I~ ~ ~e~ ~y ~,) Phone Number: Glq'7~-22~l ~ ~9 Sales Manager (Print): ?~/~/P L. ~D~ Authorized Signature: ~~;~ Remarks: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE WARRANTY INFORMATION ITEM NO. 6 APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Engineering Department ~ March 18, 1991 Acceptance of Public Improvements in Tract No. 23177 PREPARED BY: Albert Crisp R ECOMMENDAT ION: That the City Council ACCEPT the Public Improvements in Tract No. 23177, AUTHORIZE the reduction of street, sewer, and water bonds, ACCEPT the surety bond endorsement reducing the faithful performance bond amounts, APPROVE the subdivision agreement rider, and DIRECT the City Clerk to so advise the clerk of the Board of Supervisors. DISCUSSION: On December 21, 1989, the Riverside County Transportation Department transmitted Tract No. 23177 for City Clerk's signature. The tract map was signed by the City Clerk December 24, 1989 and was recorded December 28, 1989. In accordance with the City Manager's letter of January 3, 1990 to the County Road Commissioner, the County Clerk was to file the surety bonds. On January 5, 1990, the bonds and agreements were delivered to the Clerk of the Board by First American Title Company at City's request. The Clerk of the Board is now unable to locate these documents. The developer has met the Conditions for reducing the Faithful Performance Bonds and is therefore entitled to a reduction of such bond amounts as appropriate, resolution of the locating of the bonds and agreements not withstanding. The Developer: Homes By the Green 4532 Plumosa Drive Yorba Linda, CA 92686 STAFFRPT\TM23177 1 executed subdivision agreements for the improvement of streets, and the installation of sewer and water systems. Accompanying the subdivision agreements were surety bonds issued by: American Motorists Insurance Company 7470 N. Figuroa Los Angeles, CA 90041 as follows: Bond No. 35M 754 132 00 in the amount of $284,000.00 to cover street improvements. Bond No. 35M 754 132 00 in the amount of $50,500.00 to cover water improvements. Bond No. 35M 754 132 00 in the amount of $38,200.00 to cover sewer improvements. Bond No. 35M 754 132 00 in the amount of $186,350.00 to cover materials and labor. The following items have been completed by the developer or his engineer in accordance with the approved plans: Required street, sewer, and water improvements. The affected streets are existing Rainbow Canyon Road and Pala Road, and two 12) private streets - Putting Green Court and Birdie Drive. The inspection and verification process relating to the above items has been completed by the County of Riverside Road Department and City Staff, and the Engineering Department recommends the reduction in subdivision improvement bond amounts. The existing model home complex has certain fencing and related improvements which will ultimately be removed and may require repairs in that removal process. In addition, the required street trees for each lot have not been installed as building construction on these lots has not commenced. Accordingly, the normal 10% warranty retention for street improvements has been augmented for these future removals and tree installations. The release of this additional $5,000.00 bonding will follow satisfactory completion 'of these items. Therefore, it is appropriate to reduce/release these bonds as follows: Streets: $250,600.00 Water: 45,450.00 Sewer: 34,380.00 STAFFRPT\ TM2 317 7 The remaining 10% of the original faithful performance bond amounts are to be retained for one (1) year guarantee period, The street bond includes the 10% guarantee amount and retains $5.000,00 as discussed above: Streets: $33,~00.00 Water: 5,050.00 Sewer: 3,820.00 AC:ks Attachments: Location Map Agreement Endorsement STAFFRPT~TM23177 Bond No. 3SM 754 132 00 SURETY BOND ENDORSEMENT To be attached to and form a part of Faithful Performance & Labor Material Bond, issued by the undersigned Company, as Surety, on behalf of Homes By The Green as Principal, and in favor of County of Riverside , as ©bligee. Effective March 12th attached Bond as follows: , 19 91 , the Principal and the Surety hereby agree to amend the Streets & Drainage Reduced by $250,600.00 to now Read $33,400.00 Water System Reduced by $45,450.00 to now Read $5,050.00 Sewer System Reduced by $34,380.00 to now Read $3,820.00 Total Bond Amount Reduced by $330,430.00 to now Read $42,270.00 Obligee's Name Amended to now Read City of Temecula. All else remains the same. Provided that the liability under this endorsement shall be part of, and not in addition to, the liability under the attached bond, and in no event cumulative. Noth{ng herein contained shall vary, alter or extend any of the provisions, conditions, or other terms of this bond except as above stated. S{gned, sealed and dated this 12th day of March ,19 91 . Homes By The Green, L.P. STATE OF FLORIDA By.. O/, COUNTY OF CO .L ER Douglas' 'Whitney, Pre~dent Before me this day personally appeared George O. Rethati, who, being duly sworn, BIJUR, Inc., ,~General ~m~tner of states that he is the CEO of BIJUR, Inc. and Homes By The Green/L,P. that BISUR, Inc., is the General Partner of (Homes By T~e Green, L.P. Homes By The Green/ ~wgrr~ to anal ~(lbscr~bed before m~ this ,~t . of , A.D., 197/ · George O. Ra[ha~, CEO tit,, NB~_y Public/ BIJUR, Inc., General Par~ner of My Commission Expire~ Homes By Tl~e Green, L.P. AMERICAN MOTORISTS TNSURgNCI~. COMP.~NY Attorney in fact ACCEPTED: City of Temecula Name of Obligee Endorsement No: 1 Title FK 613-4 3-87 5r-.4 PRINTED IN U,S.A. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Orange s~. On March 16, 1991 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared DOUGLAS S. WHITNEY personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the President, and personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the Secretary of the Corporation that executed the within instrument and board of directors. ' WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature ~1~ .~ ~/~,_,_~ ~ . FOR INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT , befo~me, the undersigned, a Not-~ublic in and for said_,~,~e, personally appeared ~,~~ II k t~~ov t~a~,~o .me on the basis of - 't f tc ryevidensa~sa oceto~b~theperson__'"w,b,osename subscribed to the~hin instrument an"d~cknowledged that ~e~ucted th_e_.same. ~ ~rgnature { OFFICIAL SEAL ' DIANA M. ME43LA % Uy Comm. E.~. ,~. ~8, (This area for official notarial seal) STATE OF CALIFOR.NIA, COUNTY OF_ on 12 1991 County and State, personally appeared Los AnReles , before me a~ Notary Public, within and Ibr the sai KIPTON KELLER , known to me(or proved to m~ on the basis of satifactory evidence) to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the Attorney in Fact of and for the AHERICA2q MOTORISTS INSURANCE COFR'ANY and acknowledged to me that he subscribed U:e name of the AHERZCA~ I, tOTOILtS~S ~~~ TAMMY M. ~ER ~ ~ {;ea ~1 ~TARY ~BLIC ~LIFORNIA ~ LOS ANGELES CDU INSURANCE COH. PAi, iVd~ereto as Surety, and his own name as Attorney t n3Tinn3L cnmPanlE-~ AGREEMENT REGARDING SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into between the CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY", and Homes ]~y The G;~een, hereinafter called "CONTRACTOR". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County of Riverside and CONTRACTOR have entered into a series of agreements and CONTRACTOR has submitted a series of bonds in connection with consideration by the County of Riverside of final map approval concerning Tract Z3177; WHEREAS, the City of Temecula incorporated on December 1, 1989; WHEREAS, in order to expeditiously process the acceptance of improvements pursuant to the final map, the CITY has permitted subdividers to use the existing County Subdivision Agreement and Bond forms in lieu of CITY forms; WHEREAS, certain references in the County forms incorrectly refer to County positions instead of City positions; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between CITY and CONTRACTOR as follows: 1. All references to the "County of Riverside" contained in of the documents between CITY and CONTRACTOR concerning Tract 23177 are now defined as referring to the "City of Temecula". 2. All references Commissioner" contained in any CONTRACTOR concerning Tract to refer to the "City Engineer". to the "Riverside County Road documents between CITY and are now hereby defined 3. All references to any other Riverside County offices or positions contained in the Agreements or Bonds concerning Tract 23177 now hereby refer to the equivalentAITY offices or positions. / Homes B/ The/Gre;n, L.P. CON~-R/~OR'~5~- Dated: March 15, 1991 By: Gees/gecO. Rethati, CEO BISUR, ~Inc., General Partner of _ , ~ - i , Ja.- (Pri~ Signatore's Name) J~y.~ L ~.~._~/~j'...~../~J~/,y .. .Homes II~y ~he Green, LoPo uoug~as/~. wnz~ney, ~resmen~ BIJUR, Inc., General Partner (~TY OF TEMECULA Homes By The Green, L.P. Dated: RON PARKS. MAYOR Dated: DAVID F. DIXON, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Before me this day personally appeared George O. Rethati, who, being duly sworn, states that he is the CEO of BIJUR, Inc. and that BISUR, Ir~c., is the General Partner of Homes By The~Gre~m, L.P. f~worr~ to and ~ub/~cribed before me this ~~/ay Of (~~ , A.D., 19~/ . ~i~lfft~r~ Public / 0 ~ ~ State el Fierid My Commission Expires: lB/[a..~,'-daa E~pim J~11~ I1, '~ FOR CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF Orange On March 16, 1991 , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared DOUGLAS S. WHITNEY personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the President, and personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who executed the within instrument as the Secretary of the Corporation that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the~thin. instrument pursuant to its by-laws or a r~esolution of its board of directors. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature FOR INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S TAN~I'T~F CAL I FORN IA COUNTYDF~ , before m uO:dersigned, a Nota~ic in and for said S tate/,~onally appeared '~,,~ ~ personally known to me or pr~S~['l~e on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be~,l~q'~person._wh"'lg~name subscribed to the ~ inw strument and a~q~owledged that ~ exe~'Ed the same. ~lTNES~~,h~nd and official seal. · ature , ~ OFFICIAL SEAL ' DLa~IA M. Mr=OLA NOII~/Pul~ic-CaUfoml~ ' ~t Oumm. ~. Aug. l& l~z ' ~ OFFICIAL ~L ~ D~ M. My ~m. E~. ~. 1~ 1~ (This area for ot'ticial notarial seal) · AMK~¢AN MOTOP/$TS [NSUKANCE COMPANY n~na ~ O~i~ L~ m~ ZL aO~ I~U~ ~m~ ~ OP A~~ ' ~ow ~ M~ BF ~ese ~sen~: E~pton Eellet off Los Angeles, California .ith the dote of issuefloe of this po~er end ending Oeoe.6or 31, 199Z, tulua 8mr revoKod for' and on its ~lf as .~,e,y. u.d as its uot md dood: Any and all bonds and undertakings provided the amount of no one bond or undertaking exceeds FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000.00) **************************************************************** ~il ~ri~ ~ ~* ~i* ~ ~ ~lipti~ *o ~ ~lit into ~ or m~ ~ in o~r to bri~ ~1~ ~ its ~brly elmt~ offi.. ot its primiMl offi. ~ L~ ~, ~lS AP~I~ ~LL CE~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ OF DECE~R 31, 1992. ~D, ~t ~ ~i~ of ~ b~, ~ P~i~t; ~ ~ ViM P~i~t, ~ ~f, ~ ~ s~ offi~ of h ~ my ~in* ~ts for ~*m of p~s." ~18 PMr of i**o~ il 8i~t. ml~ ~ ~*ifi~ ~ f~imilo ~r ~ ~ mbi~ of b foll~i~ resoluli~ ~*~ ~ ~ E~ti~ C~it*m of b b~ of Oi~to. of ~ C~ at · mti~ ~O, ~* ~ si~ of h hi~ of h b~, h P~i~*, ~ Vim P~i~t, In T~ti~ h~f, h ~ri~ ~t~ists Z~ C~ ~s ~ ~is ~*~* to b si~ ~ its ~*e ~ml. to b affix~ ~ its ~~ offi~fi, ~io ~th ~y of .~.~m~ , 1~ 9~ · ~ J. 5. ~em~r, III, ~nior Vice Pro,dent F. C. McCulloush, Secretary STATE OF ZLLZNOZ~ SS COI.L'TY OF' LAKE l, Grm=e E. Candon, · Notary Publio, do hereby certi~/ thor d. S. Kmr, ZZZ ~ F. C. ~u11~ ~rsnlly ~ to m to b ~ ~ ~ ~se ~ o~ ~ti~ly so ~i~ Vim P~i~t ~ ~*a~ of ~ ~ri~ ~orists Z~ C~, . Co~ti~ of ~ Sbto of Zlli~i., ~ri~ to h fo~i~ imt~*, ~ kfore m ~ ~ vol~ ~* for ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~in set for~. ., Public FIq 836-S S-~O ~q Pmmr of Attornoy - Tern Grace ~ Condon N0t~ry Public. State of liftnots Groom l. Candan, Notary PRXNTEO IN U.S.A. CI~TIFICATION ~ri~ ~torists ~ C~. ~i8 PNr of Atto~ limits ITEM NO. 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Engineering Department ~ March 26, 1991 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-F PREPARED BY: Douglas M. Stewart R ECOMMENDAT I ON: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-F. Amended No, 2 subject to the Conditions of Approval, DISCUSSION: Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627, a two ( 2 ) phase project, was originally submitted to Riverside County Planning Department on February 10, 1982. The Tentative Tract Map, Amended No. 2 was approved by the County Planning Commission on September 14, 1988, and by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. Phase F was approved by the County Planning Department on June 20, 1989. A tract map revision and extension was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on February 25, 1991. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627-F contains 126 loton 25.59 acres. This phase is located at the northwest corner of North General Kearny Road and Nicolas Road. The applicant is Van Daele Rancho 126 Ltd. The following fees have been paid (or deferred ) for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627: Signal Mitigation Fee (Deferred to Building Permits) Area Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee (Deferred to Building Permits) $18,900.00 31,466.73 50,400.00 STAFFRPT \ FVT2 2 6 2 7 1 This Tract Map is not part of a Specific Plan nor is it governed by a Development Agreement. Requirement of Quimby fees ( Park fees) were not historically conditions of approval by the County of Riverside until some time on or after June, 1988, Requirement of Quimby fees was not adopted and is not requested as a condition of approval of the final map. Water, sewer and drainage improvements .have been completed at the project site. Street improvements are approximately half completed. Bonding of street improvements, a warranty bond for improvements, and monument bond will be required for Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-F: Faithful Labor and Performance Material Street Warranty of Improvements Survey Monuments $539,500.00 $68,800.00 $40,000.00 $269,750.00 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-F, Amended No. 2, subject to the Conditions of Approval. GH:ks Attachments: 1. Development Checklist 2. Location Map 3. Copy of Map 4. Conditions of Approval 5. Fees & Securities Report STAFFRPT\ FVT2 2 6 2 7 CASE NO.: CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST Vestin.q Tentative Tract Map No. 22627-F The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation ( Quimby ) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Traffic Signal Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Library ) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 25 (Planning) N/A N/A Condition No. 10 ( Roads & Surveyor) N/A Condition No. 15 (Planning) Condition No. ltt (Planning) STAFFRPT\FVT22627 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT VESTING PARCEL MAP/ TRACT NO. 22627-F DATE 12/7/90 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY Streets and Drainaqe $ 539.500.00 $ 269,750.00 Water $ 78.000.00 $ 39,000.00 Sewer $ 70,500.00 $ 35,250.00 TOTAL $ 688,000.00 $ 344,000. O0 *Maintenance Retention (10% for one year) *(or Bonds if work is completed) $ 68.800.00 Monument Security City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFC Drainage Fee Due Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees 40,000.00 31,466.73 18,900.00 -0- Plan Check Fee Due Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fee Paid To Date (Credit) Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due (Refund by County) $ $ $ $ $ -0- 24,009.87 --0- 28,591.00 4,581.13 STAFFRPT\ FVT2 2 6 2 7 Project f ' *,11 MONIIRO coumV ,,~[ ...... ~EADOWVIEW A~mm Ctr '~'~ ~ " S i te ii II '~Hotlo w ZIP CODE BOUNDARY I;..,,:...*., = ",'"t~M~U~x:,,.~.,:.:~:c11%..'~ ~ CIELO t THE ~ VINEYARD SERENA DRN: '."'.LU (7) ~ ,,i --I .._z ~.~- ~ COqJNTY O~ RiVERT~DE, STATE. OF CA!.IFORI~I~, PL~NING DEPAI~TMENT ~)4J~MITTALDATE: September 30, ZONE NO. 5]]9.-_~ST[NG TEHTATIVE TRACT NO. - First Sul~visor~al District - ~urr~etA Area - 53 Sche~le A - REQUEST: R-R to R-2 and l~ ~lanning C~ission and Staff Recmmnend: =4)O~TION o~ the Negative Declaration for Environmental ~ssessment No. 32361 based on the findings incorporated in the environmental assessment and the conclusion that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment; and AP.~AL of ~HANGE OF ZONE NO.' 511g from R-R to Ro2 ~nd R-5 in accordQnce wit~ Exhibit 2, based upon the findings and conclusions incorporated in the Planning Co~mission minutes dated September lJ, 1988; and ~ At~I~ROV~L of VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627, Amented ~o. 2, subjects.to the attached conditions, based on the findings ant conclusions incorp6~ated in the Planning Cormnission minutes dated September l~, 1988. ~j3~r ~'~[reeter, Pl~nr>i~ Director FHVERb~DE COUNTY Fq. ANNING DEPART~,~"'T On motion of Su~ervisor Abraham, seconded by Surfeit-or Larson ~ ~ly caT=ied by ~ni~ue vo~e, IT ~AS O~E~D that th~,. a~ve ~r i~ ~ed as :ec~nd~ and ~at County Counsel Ls .directe~ to ~e~are ~e necessa~ ordinance for ~oo:ion. A~= ~=~, D~lap, ~ni~=ol, Yo~glove and ~roon ~= ~ -- ~rald A. ~oney Dt~. AG~ NDA N< ). 10. 1 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 6, 1990 (AGENDA ITEM 2-2 - Tape 1A) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 22627, MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 - CSL Engineering - Murrieta Area - First Supervisortal District - north of Nicholas Rd, west of Via Lobo - MINOR CHANGE REQUEST: Chanqe product type, a precise plot plan Hearing was opened at 9:45 a.m. and was closed at 9:48 a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, Minor Change No. 2 based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 22627, Minor Change No. 2 is a request to change the product type in the final phase of the R-2 tract. The site is located north of Nicholas Road and east of North General Kearney Road in the City of Temecula. Currently the site is vacant and the surrounding uses include single family residential, existing construction and vacant land. The site is zoned R-2 and R-5. The Minor Change is a request to change the product type (precise plot plan, floor plans, elevations) on Phase F. This change would affect 126 residential lots on 27.4 acres. Staff said no changes were made in the lot lines nor in the street lay out. As noted in the staff report, the site shows 8-16 dwelling units per acre in the Southwest Area Community Plan. Staff cannot explain this discrepancy even though the original map was approved for 4.16 dwelling units per acre. The B-16 dwelling units per acre only covers the final phase of the case in question and the vesting tract map is already approved. Staff feels that the minor change is consistent with the approved map and the density it was originally approved at is considered to be appropriate with the surrounding designations. TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT John Able, 2gO0 Adams Street, Riverside representing the applicant concurred with the recommendations of staff. There was no one present in opposition. The hearing was closed at 9:48 a.m. FINDINGS ~D CONCLUSIONS: Vesting Tentative Tract 22627 was originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 198B; the original approval consisted of 219 residential lots and one open space lot on 53 acres; subsequent untttzation divided the tract into two phases; Phase I consists of 93 lots on 25 acres; Phase F consists of 126 lots on 27.3 acres; Minor Change No. ! to Tract 22627 changed the approved product type on Phase 1; Minor Change No. 2 to Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type on Phase F; the site is vacant and graded; surrounding land uses tnclude vacant land and single famtly residential; the site is zoned R-2 and R-B; surrounding zoning tncludes R-l, R-2, R-R, and S-P; the site is designated 8-16 du/ac on the Southwest Area Con~nunlty Plan (SWAP); the Southwest Area Community Plan designation affects only Phase F on Tract 22627 and was applied after the original tentative map RIVERSIDE COUN~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 6, 1990 · was approved at 4.16 du/ac; the City of Temecula considers SWAP to be advisory in nature; SWAP Category I policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes; the product change request is not inconsistent with the approved tentative map which is compatible with area development; the Local Recreational Trail shown along Santa Gertrudis Creek on SWAP was not requested since it was not on the original tentative map and such a request would necessitate a redesign of the map not allowed by a minor change application; new environmental assessments are not undertaken on minor change applications; there is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or which will be studied within a reasonable time; there is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan and the project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed minor change is consistent ~th the land use policies of the Southwest Area Community Plan and with the Comprehensive General Plan and the proposed minor change is consistent with the approved tentative map and is compatible with area development. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Donahoe and unanimously carried, the Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, Minor Change No. 2 based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. ( DA ITEM 2-3 - Tape 1A, lB) F ZONE 5625 - EA 34388 - Rick Engineering Co. - Sedco/Wildomar Area - First S~ sorial District - 36.B± acres, southwest of Palomar St, northwest of McVicar - R-R to R-l, etc. WITH VESTING TRACT I0. 25247 - 106 lots - 36.8± acres - Schedule A Hearing opened at g: .m. and was closed at 10:08 a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ado of the Negative Declaration for EA 343B8 based on the conclusion that the t will not have a significant effect on the environment and approval of Chan Zone 5625 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with Exhibit 2 and approval of Tentative Tract 25427, Amended ~1 based on the finding and conclusions in the ff report and subject to the conditions of approval. Change of Zone and Vesting Tentative Tract 25247 are concurrent requests to change the zontn 36.8 acres from R-R to R-! and to subdivide the parcels into log residential ~. The subject site is located southwest of Palomar Street and nort McVtcar street in the Sedco/Wildomar zoning area. The surrounding land u~ are vacant land, single family residential and some limited agricultural uses. rrently the site is zoned R-R mile the surrounding zoning is R-R and R-X. ubJect site is designated for residential use at 2-4 dwelling units per the Southwest Area Community Plan as well as the surrounding properties. Is of concern that were identified in the environmental assessment included Palomar Street and the regional trail easement along the Wildomar !l. Staff at this point amended the following condition. Zoning Area: Murrieta, Rancho California Supervi$orial District: Regional Team: One HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 22627 Planning Commission: 6-06-90 Agenda Item: 2-2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT STAFF REPORT 10. Applicant: Engineer/Rep.: Type of Request: Location: Existing Zoning: Surrounding Zoning: Site Characteristics: Area Characteristics: Comprehensive General Plan Designation: Land Division Data: 11. Agency Recommendations: 12. Letters: 13. Sphere of Influence: Van Daele Development CSL Engineering Change approved precise plot plan, floorplans, elevations on final phase North of Nicholas Road,. East of North General Kearney Road R-2, R-5 R-2, R-5, R-R, R-A-l/2 Vacant, graded, moderately sloping Vacant, hilly, single family residences Land Use: Category I - Southwest Area Community Plan Density: 8-16 DU/AC Open Space/Cons.: Areae Not Designated Total Acreage: 27.4 Total Lots: 126 residential, 1 open space DU Per Acre: 4.6 DU/AC Proposed Nin. Lot Size: 4527 square ft. Road: 2-06-90 Health: 2-02-90 Flood: 1-22-90 Fire: 1-31-90 Building & Safety Land Use: 7-26-88 Grading: 1-29-90 Opposing/Supporting: None received In City of Temecula ANALYSZS: Pro.iect Backaround Vesting Tract 22627 was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988 as a Restricted Single Family subdivision consisting of 219 residential lots and one open space lot. The original subdivision covered 53 acres north of Nicholas Road between North General Kearney Road and the northeastern Rancho TENTATZVE TRACT MAP NO. 22627 HZNOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Report Page 2 Temecula line. Subsequent unitization divided the tentative map into two phases, Phase ~ covering the eastern 25 acres (93 lots) and Phase ~ covering the western 27.3 acres (126 lots). Minor Change No. 1 to Tract 22627 changing the originally approved precise plot plan, floorp'1ans, and elevations on Phase ! was previously approved . The site is located north of Nicholas Road and east of North General Kearney Road in what is now the City of Temecula. Pro.iect Description Minor Change No. 2 to Vesting Tentative Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type (precise plot plan, floorplans, elevations) on Phase F. The change affects 126 residential lots on 27.4 acres, No substantial changes were made to either lot lines or street layout. !and Use/Zoninq The subject site is current, Iv vacant anc~ graded, Surrounding land uses consist of vacant land and single family residential, The site is currently zoned R-2 and R-5 as established by Change of Zone No, 5119, Surrounding zoning includes R-l, R-2, R-R, and Project Consistency The project site is designated for residential use at a density range of 8-16 DU/AC on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP), This 8-16 DU/AC designation covers only Phase F of Tract 22627 and all of TR 23128 south of Nicholas Road, The designation was applied after (11-28-90) the original tentative map was approved at 4.16 DU/AC and as such appears to contradict the approved subdivisions within the designation. [n addition, since the site is within the City of Temecula, SWAP designations are advisory only. Southwest Area Community Plan Category ! policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes. Staff considers this product change request to be clearly consistent with the approved tentative map and compatible with approved and recorded maps in the immediate area, including Phase ! of Tract 22627 to the east. The Southwest Area Community Plan Recreational Trails and Bike Path map shows a Local Recreational Trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek, The tract is part of Assessment District 161 which shows plans for a concrete sided Channel with 1,5 to 1 slopes, Trail easements are TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO. 22627 H[NOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Report Page 3 not practical immediately adjacent to channels with steep slopes and no easement was obtained on either the original tentative map or Ninor Change No. 1. In order to obtain such an easement, normally 14 feet wide, the entire tract layout would have to be shifted. This type of 'redesign would have exceeded the type of revision allowed under a minor change. Fnvironmental Analysis Minor Change requests are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, therefore no new initial study was conducted· All environmental issues were addressed under the Environmental Assessment No, 32361 done for the original review of Tentative Tract Nap No, 22627. FZNDZNGS: Vesting Tentative Tract Z2527 was originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. The original approval consisted of 219 residential lots and one open space lot on 53 acres. Subsequent unitization divided the tract into two phases. Phases I consists of 93 lots on 25 acres. Phase F consists of 126 lots on 27.3 acres· Minor Change No. I to Tract 22627 changed the approved product type on Phase I. Minor Change No. 2 to Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type on Phase F. The site is vacant and graded. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and single family residential. The site is zoned R-2 and R-5. R-l, R-2, R-R, and S-P. Surrounding zoning includes The site is designated 8-16 DU/AC on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP). The Southwest Area Community Plan designation affects only Phase F on Tract 22627 and was applied after the original tentative map was approved at 4.16 DU/AC. TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO, 22627 HZNOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Report Page 4 10, The City of Temecula considers SWAP to be advisory in nature. 11, SWAP Category ! policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes. 12. The product change request is not inconsistent with the approved tentative map which is compatible with area development. 13. The Local Recreational Trail shown along Santa Gertrudis Creek on SWAP was not requested since it was not on the original tentative map and such a request would necessitate a redesign of the map not allowed by a minor change application, 14. New environmental assessments are not undertaken on minor change applications, 15. There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or which will be studied within a reasonable time, 16. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. 17. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed minor change is consistent with the land use policies of the Southwest Area Community Plan and with the Comprehensive General Plan· The proposed minor change is consistent with the approved tentative map and is compatible with area development. RFCOMHENDATIONS: APPROVAl Of VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO. 22627, NINOR CHANGE NO. 2 based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. LD:lgg 5/16/90 2-5' t~'~/ / ,,,, $P Pt-YI-IodLI JI GRADING UIC VAC. HILLS CREEK :OFFICE VAC. , ";~::~'-:;'--;~;~-"~;~'i~ -.RES. ~ =LS: ~. ~- ~ ~ , RES. I/I, ' N 5 - ~Z ~ c o,- o . ~ RES. I ~p. R~~ ~IFIC ENGINEERING I"- 400' ~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ a.a ,~ i .i · o ! I ,I sl I I I ! I !1 / RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627, MINOR CHANGE No. 2 DATE: AMENDED NO. 1, CORRECTZON NO. 1 EXPIRES: STANDARD CONDITIONS The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Tract No. 22627, Mtnor Change No. 2. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code, Section 65499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County fai. ls to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, of October 25, 1988 unless extended as provided by Ordinance No. 460. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) The final map shall be prepared by a' licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a molls report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the ~otls stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading if proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of ccwnprehenstve grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Cods, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance No. 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. VESTING TENTAT[VE TRACT NO. 22627 #[NOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 e 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. A 9radtng permit shall be obtatned from the Department of Building an~ Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of County maintained road right-of-way. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 2-06-90, a copy of which is attached. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the'governing body accepts or abandon[ Such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Poad Commissioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances sha~l be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth tn the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 2-02-90, a copy of whtch ts attached. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control Otstrict's letter dated 7-27-88, a copy of which is attached. [f the land division 1tea within an adopted floodcontrol dralnage area pursuant to Sectton 10.25 of Ordinance No. 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area dratnage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. The subdivider shall comply wtth the ftre improvement recommendations outltned tn theCounty Ftre Narshal's letter dated 1-31-90, a copy of~htch ts attached. (Amended per #1nor Change No, 2) The subdivider shall comply ulth the recoeeendatlons set forth in the Department of Butldtng end Safety Land Use Otvtslon transmittal dated 7-26-88, a copy of which is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department Butlding and Safety Gradtng Sectton transmittal dated 1-29-90, a copy of whtch ts attached. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) VESTZNG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 18. 19. 20. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area improvement phastng, if applicable, shall b, subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots tn each phase, and shall substantially conform to the tntent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply wtth the following: All lots shall have a mtnimum stze of 4726 square feet net. (Amended per Hlnor Change No. 2) All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance No. 460. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance No. 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. de Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of'the R-2 zone. When lots are. crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utlltty easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted wtth triterim landscaping or provided wtth other erosion control measures as approved by the Director of Butldtng and Safety. g® All street lights and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside Oounty Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Upon approval of this vesting tentative tract map, Tentative Tract Map No. 21430, as it pertains to the subject site, shall be null and void and of no further force or effect. (Amended by Planning Commission on 9-14-88) VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AHD. NO. 1, CORA. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 22627 21. Prior to the RECORDATION of the final map, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit written clearances to theRiverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Parks Department County Health Department County Planning Department be Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5!19, shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. Ce The Santa Gertrudts Creek Channel area Shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final map and shall be offered to the Riverside County Flood Control District for dedication. Any area between the channel and the Nicholas Road right of way shall be landscaped by the developer and maintained by a landscape maintenance district, CSA 143 or subsequent Temecula Community Services District. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall convey to the County fee simple title to all common open space areas, free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which in the sole discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to thecounty accepting title to such areas, the subdtvtder shall submtt the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall bm subject to the approval of that department and the Office of.the County Counsel: 1. A declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions; and, A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions, end restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AHD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 Thedeclaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions submitte~ for review shall (a) provide for a mintmum term of 60 years, (b) provlde for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the o~ners of each Individual lot or untt as tenants in common, and (c) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in thts Declaration to the contrary, the following provision sha~ apply: The property owners' association established herein shal~, if dormant, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the County's demand, tttle to all or any part of the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'E ', attached hereto. The declslon to require activation of the property owners' association and the decision to require that the association unconditionally accept tttle to the 'common area' shall be at the sole discretion of the County of Riverside. In the event that the 'common area', or any part thereof, is conveyed to the property owners' association, the association, thereafter, sha~ own such 'common area', sha~ manage and continuously matntatn such 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the P]anntng Director of theCounty of Riverside or the County's successor-In-Interest. Theproperty owners' association shall have the right to assess the o~ners of each Individual lot or untt for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and $ha~l have the rlght to 1ten the property of any such owner who defaults tn the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, she11 be prior to all other 1lens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment 1ten. Thts Declaration $hall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property deannexed therefrom absent the prtor wrttten consent of the P~anntng Dtrector of the County o¢ Riverside or the County's successor-In-Interest. A proposed amendment shall be constdered 'substantial' tf it affects the extent, usage, or maintenance of the 'common area'. VESTXNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 6 the event of any confltct between %hts Declaration and the Articles of [ncorporatlon, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, this Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded at the same ttme that the final map ts recorded. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for parkway and s)opelandscape maintenance, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance district. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Departments. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall bereleased concurrently with the release of subdivision performance bonds, guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4. The developer, the developer's euccessors-tn-lnterest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. (Added per #1nor Change No. 2) The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Planning Director. VESTZNG TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AHD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 7 ge A final plan of development shall be submitted for Planning DeparUnent approval pursuant to Section ?.11g of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The final plan of development shall contain the following elements: a. The site's ftnal gradtng plan. A final stte plan showing the lots, butldtng footprints, al~ setbacks, yard spaces and floor plan and elevation assignments to individual lots. Construction plans of the dwellings to be constructed in the subdivision. The plans shall be tn a form suitable for submission to the Department of Building and Safety for plan checking. de A typical mechanical plan showing the location and placement ofmechanical equipment for Individual dwellings. The required ftnal plan of development shall be in substantial conformance with the proJect's approved grading plan, site plan, floor plans and elevations except as provided for in Section 7.11g(2). Thts subdivision may be recorded In phases subject to the following: Proposed phastng, Including phase boundaries, sequencing and floor plan selection, shall be subject to Planntng Director's approval. Each proposal phase shall comply wtth theprovisions of Sectton 7.11 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. e If any phase of the subdivision will be developed with fewer than the approved number of floor plans, the cumulative mix of floor plans resulting ¢roa the sequential recordation of phases shall co~oly with Section 7.11f(3) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Prlor to the recordation of the ftnal mp, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) she11 be prepared tn oon~unctton wtth the ftnal map to delineate 1dentilted environmental concerns and shall be permanently f11ed wtth [he oCftce of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECSshall be transmitted to the PlanntngDepartment for revtew and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded wtth coptes of the recorded ftnal map to the Planntng Department and the Department of Butldtng and Safety. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AHD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 22. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: "County Geologic Report No. 352 was prepared for this property and ts on file at the Riverside County Planntng Department. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, detailed common open Space area landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following: Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity· All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the stte. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth bermtng, ground cover, shrubs, and spectmen trees in conjunction wtth meandering sidewalks, benches, and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Department. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specimen accent trees at key viaual focal potrite within the project. Where street trees cannot be planted wlthtn the right-of-way of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. ® Landscaping plans shall incorporate native anddrought tolerant plants where appropriate. All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subJect property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. All trees shall be mtntmumdouble-staked. Weaker and/or slow- growing trees shall be steel-staked. VESTING TENTATIVE TRAc MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page g NO. 22627 Ce de fe Stx (6) sets of landscaping plans shall be submitted with a completed plot plan application form and the current processing fee to the Publtc [nformation sectlon. (Added per Ninor Change No. 2) Any oak trees removed with four (4) lnch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planntng Director. Replacement trees'shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of the tentative map grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. e Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March. 3. Preliminary pad and' roadway elevations. 4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board-adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or Individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet tn verttcal height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of aspectal terracing' (benching) plan, tncrease slope ratto (t.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttng combined with Irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a fifteen (15) percent grade. All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceed ten (10) feet in vertical hetght shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. e The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with red11 designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permtt such rounding. Where cut and/or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal · length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. VESTING TENTATZVE TRA NINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AHD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 10 NO. 22627 23. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shal] provide evidence to the Dtrector of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-stte manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by %he Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the tssuance of BUILDING PERHITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: No building permtts shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any residential lot/unit wlthtn the project boundary until the developer or the developer's successors-in-interest provide evidence of compliance with publlc facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per 1ot/untt shall be deposited wi%h the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library development. be Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety, an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn. This report shall be submitted to and approved by the Riverside County Health Department, Division of Special Services. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate all required elements from the subdivislon's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. de Prior to the .issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and trrl*gation plans shall be approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall address all areas and aspects of the tract requiring landscaping and irrigation rob.Installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and Individual front yard landscaping. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however, solar equtl~eent or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approval. Building separation between all buildings excluding a I foot fireplace encroachment, shall not be less than ten (10) feet. g. All street side yard satbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet. he All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Building elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B (Colored Elevations). (Amended per Minor change No. 2) VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRAC MZNOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 11 tO. 22627 24. Materials used in the construction of all building shall be in substantial conformance with that shown in Exhibtt C (Materials Board), (Amended per Minor Change No, 2) Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, a six foot high wall shall be constructed along the south lot lines of lots 95 through 126. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, a six foot high chain link fence shall be constructed along the south boundary of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Flood Channel. The required fence shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety. Wall and fence locations shall conform to attached Exhibit F. Wall and fence materials and design shall conform to those shown in Exhibit D (Design Manual from originally approved Tract 22627). (Amended per Minor Change. No. 2) All landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If the seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping, and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determlned by the acoustical study where applicable. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance wtth the standards of Ordinance No. 461. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance wtth the standards of Ordinance No. 460. he Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, landscape screening, designed to be opaque up to a minim,,, height of six feet at maturity, shall be installed along the south boundary of the Santa Gertrudis Creek adjacent to the chain link fence. VESTING TENTATIVE TRAc MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 NO. 22627 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance oF resolution. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) LD:lgg 5/17/90 E OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUI .;URVEYOR February 6, 1990 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Ladies and Gentlemen: KO. BOX ~ OU.HDI~IA 92502 TR 22627 -Amend #1 Minor Change #2 Schedule A - Team I - SMD %9 AP %111-111-111-9 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recoauaends ~hat the landdivider provide the following street improvements, street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline elevations, all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptabilitymay require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in all. The2 are intendedrob.complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Cc~missioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concentration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a drainage essesprit, All drainage easements shall be shorn on the final amp and noted as followsz -Drainage ~_=m~nt - no ~,~l~ng, obstructions, or encroack~ents by land fills are allowed". The protection shall be as a~oved by the Road De~t. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits'the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XX of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. COUNT%' ADMINISlltA~ T~ 22627 - Amend #1 - Minor Change #2 F~bruary 6, 1990 Page 2 ® 5 ® 10. 11. 12. 13. Major drainage is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. Sierra Moore Drive, Sllver R/dge Court, Cross Creek Court, Bogart Place and PaumaValleyRoad shall be improved within the dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') The la~divider shall provide Eastern Municipal Water District of the final map. utility prior to clearance from the recordation The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance with County Standard 9114 of Ordinance 461. Nicolas Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet fro=centerline and,~tch up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfacing of existing paving asdeterminedby the Road Cu~Lssioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 100. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sac shall be 35 feet. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the s~reet improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. When block~ails are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Co=~ssioner. The m~,~---- garage setback shall be 30 feet measured fro~ the face of curb. North GeneralKearnyRoadshallbe i,~ovr_lwith 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 fcotpartwidth dedicated right of way In accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/33') Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with Count~ Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalks). TR 22627 - Amend ~1 - Minor Change February 6, 1990 Page 3 14. 15. .16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Pr~?y and secondary access roads to the nearest paved road maintained by the County shall be constructed within the public right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32'/60') at a grade and alignment approved by the Road C~ssioner. This is necessary for circulation purposes. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shell deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $150.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the t/~e of payment, a ~ltten agreement may be entered into with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and align~ent as approved by the Riverside County Road Ccamnissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for maintenance by County. Electrical and co0~,unications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 461, Standard 817. Asphaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Section 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Standard cul-de-sacs shall be constructed throughout the landdivision. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final ~ap and offered for dedication. ~ot access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the fl~al ~ap. Landdivisions creating cut or fLll slopes adjacent s~reelm shall l:e.'ovide erosion control and sight distance control as approved by the Road All centerline intersections shall be at 90 with a-minimum 50' tangent ~easured fro~ flow ll~e or as approved by the Road Co-~,,sioner. TR.22627 - Amend tl - Minor Change #2 February 6, 1990 Page 4 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. ?he street design and improvement concept of this p~oJect shall be coordinated with TR 21430, TR 23280 and TR 23428. S~reet lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator determines whether this proposal qualifie~ under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file, &fter receiving tentative approval, for an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a 'Lighting Assessment District' in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and shown on the street im~rove~ent plans. A striping plan is required for Nicolas Road. The removal of the existing striping shell be the responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. The crossing over the Santa Gertfutile Creek at North General Kearny Road shall be u approved by the Road De~nt and Flood Control. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shell c0~ply with Road DeparU~nt st~x~ards and require approval by ~he Road Cc~missioner and usurance of continuing maintenance through the es~ablis~ment of a landscape maintenance c~Lstrlct/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by the Road Cos~/ssioner. Landscape plans sha/1 be sub~/tted on s~andard County Plan sheet format (24' x 36'). Landscape plans shall be sub~/tted with the street ls~roves~nt plans and shall depict ~ such landsc&ping, ~rlgation and related facilities as are to be placed within the public road rights-of-way. Pursuant to Section 66493 of ~e Subdivision ~ap Act any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment Dlstrlct ~t ccs~ly with the ~equ~ents o£ said Section. Road Division Engineer LAT:Jw C unty of Rivers;4e TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February 2, 1990 TRAC~ ~ 22627, I'IINOR C!tANGE NO. 2, ~l!;D ~0. 1 EnvXronnencl! Health Services ha reviewed l~Lnor Change ~o. 2, Amended No. I diced Jinuiz~ 17, 1990. Our current carmines v~11 remain is sOscid ~n our letter diced February 5, 1988. SH:tac RiVER6IDE COUNTY pLANNING DEPARTMENT GEN. FORM 4, (l~. 8/81) RIVERSI~ COU~J'TPI. AJ~ING~. 4080 Lemon Street RiYerstde. CA eZSO2 ATTO: David V~hlgren 1~; Tract Nap 22627: Being I diViliOn or Parcel I through 4 of Parcel Map ?384 as shown by map on rile in Book SO. Pages ~0 and 21 of Parcel Maps in the Office of the County Recorder, County of Riverside. State of California. (224 Lots) Gent I emen: 13~e Department or Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap No. 22827 and recommends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale ~ot less than one inch equals 200 feet, along v~th the original drawing to the County Surveyor. prints shall Ihov the internal pipe diameter, location of valves And fire hydrants; pipe and leant specifications, and the size of the at the ~unction or the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with D~v. S. Part I. Chapter ? of the CaJi~ornia Health and Safety Code. Admtnistr&ttYe Code, Title 22° Chipter 16. and General Order No. ~03 of the Public Utilities CouuilliOn st the State of California,when ippltcible. The pllns Ihill be gigned by a registered engineer and vator COmpLny with the relieving certSrS'cation: 'I certify that the design or the water system in Tract hp 22627 is in accordance with the wirer system expansion plans of the lt&nchoCaltfornia Water District and that the water lerYtce,storage and dtltribution lyltem will be adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute I ~uarintee that it will lupply water to such tract at any Ipectfic quantities, tiers or pressures for fire protection or any other putpole'. This certification shall be by I respOnltble official of the vator company. Riverside Cotmay Planning Dept. Page Two &tan: D~v'id W&hlgren .February 5, 1988 This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the f~n&l map. This Department has a statement from the. Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the D~strict. The sever system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the Cotmay Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the ~unction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sever lines Lnd water lines shall be a port,on of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by 8 registered engineer and the sever district with the ~olloving certification= "l certify that the design of the sever system Sn Tract Nap ~2627 ts in accordance with the sever system expansion plans of the Gs'tern Xunictpal Water Dillrice and that the waste disposal system Is adequate at thio time to treat the anticipated vastes from the proposed. Riverside County Pla3~ning Dept. Attn David Wahlgren Page Three February S, 1988 It viii be necessary for the financial arrangements to be sade prior to the recordation of the final It viii be necessary for the &nnexa~'i0n proceedings· to.be completely finalized prior to the recordation of the f~na! lap. Sincerely. Env~ron~enta! Health Services SH:tac RIVE~RSID£ C:OUNTY Ir].OOD C~ONTROL. AND ~VAT£R C~ONSlrRVATION DISTRIer Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regtonal Team No. ! Re: J/~s~;.;~ 7'~c~ ~i,? Me have ~evleved this case and have the following cmments: Except for nutsanco nature local runoff ~tch ma~ traverse poretons of the prope~y the project is considered free from ordtnar~ storm flood hazard. However, a stomof~usual magnitude could cause sw damage. New construc- tion should c~ly vtth all applicable o~tnanees. · The topography of the area conststs of well defined ridges and natural water- courses ~htch 'traverse the property. There is adequate area outstde o~ the natural watercourses for butldtng sites. The natural watercourses should be kept free of buildings and obstructions in order to matntatn the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A no~e should be placed on an envtronnental constraint sheet stating, 'All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the ftntshed floors a minimum of 18 inches above adjacent ground surface. £roston protectionshall be provided for mobile home' supports.' This project is tn the dratnage plan fees shall be patd in accordance with the applicable r~lesArea and regulations. The proposed zoning is consistent wtth extsttng flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing amy be required to full~ develop to the taW11eddenstty. The Dtstrlct's report dated ~1~. ~. /~ Is st111 current for this project, The District does not object to the proposed minor change. The attached cements oply. Ver~ truly yours, IRIVEII~SID£ COUNTY FLOOD CONTI~OL AND WATE:R CON$£RVATION DISTRICT Plarch 9~ 1988 till ll&llKrr ~ liverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center liveraide,' California Attention: Regional Team #o. 1 David Yahlares Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Vesting Tract 22627 This is.a proposal to d~vide about 56 acres in the Santa Gertradii Valley area, The site is between Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road and aloha the north side of Santa Gertradii Creek. Our review indicates that almost the entire property is located ¥1thin the Santa Gertrudis Creek 100 year flood plain as delin- eated on the Flood Insurance Rate Nap published by the Federal Emergency Nasadement Agency (F£NA). The developer proposes to construct a flood control channel along the site's south boundary to convey the floes from Santa Gertradii Creek and dra~n all the artsite and offslie storm runoff into this channel through street or storm drain systems. Local offsite storm flows are tributary to the east property boundary, no indication is shown how the floes would be handled. - Following are the Dlstr~ct's recommendations: This tract is located within the limits of the Nurrieta Creek/Santa Gertradii Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid es set forth under the provisions of the "Rules sndrRegulationa for Administration of Area Drainage Plans', amended July 3, 198~: Draina8e fees iball be paid to the Road Commissioner as part of the fAllns for record of the subdivision final nap or parcel nap, or if the recording of a f~nal parcel map is uaived, drainage fees shall be paid as a condition of the ueiver prior to recording a certificate of compliance evidencing the eelvet of the parcel map; or At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired agfAdavit requesting defermeat of the payment of fees, the drainage fees shall be paid to the Building Director at the time of issuance of a grad- o~en~ pernit or building permit for each approved par- , whichever Bay be first obtained after the recording of the subdiv~alon fine'- map or parcel map; 'hamever, .-2- ~arcb g, 1988 Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 22627 Oo Drainage Fees shall be paid to the Road Coenissioner as a part of the filing for record of the subdivision final Sap or parcel map, or before receiving a waiver to record a land division, for each lot within the land division where construction activity as evi- denced by one of the following actions has occurred since Hay 26, 1981: (a) & iradins permit or building permit has been obtained. (b) Grading or structures have been initiated. The proposed channel should be constructed to the Dlstrict*s standards. The design of the proposed flood control ohannel should utilize.the following assunp~ions: a. Design discharge s 7800 cfs b. Freeboard = 2 feet Effects of transitions, curves and bridge piers should be included in the hydraulic analysis. The following should,be included in the design: a. The channel should be soft bottomed. Invert should be maintained at natural grade to pre- vent headward erosion or downstream s~ltation. Side banks should be hardened with concrete or riprap, which should extend from the top of bank to a depth below flow line based on dest~n velocities. d. Is levees will be permitted. All building sites ad- Jacent to the channel should be constructed above the adJaoent top of shinawl. Assess roads lhould be provided along each side of the ohannel. Offsite training dikes Bay be necessary to guide . Flows toYard the eh&nnelised section. Offsite ease Bents should be secured free the affected property owners. Alternatively, facilities should be npulled backu onaite. Riverside County Plannlng'Depsrtnent Re: Vesting Tract 22627 -3- Narch 9, 1988 0 Prior to initiation of the final construction draeings for those facilities required to be built as part of the Hurtlets Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley &res Drainage Plan, the developer should contact the Riverside County Flood Control and ¥ater Conservation 9istrict to ascertain the ter~s and conditions of design, construction, inspection, transfer of rights of way, project credit in lieu of fees and reiBburaeBent schedules which Bey apply. Title re- ports end title insurance Bust be provided for all right .of way to be transferred to the District. The developer should note that if the eatinBred cost for required area drainage plan facilities exceeds the required drainage fees and the developer wishes to receive credit for reim- bursecant in excess of his fees, the facilities w~11 be constructed as a public works contract. Scheduling for construction of these facilities will be st the discre- tion of the District. PerBlssion should be secured fro~ the upatrea~ property owner if any increase in wager depths greater than 6 inches is proposed and fro~ the do~nstrea~ property owner for the concentration of flows. Copies of these docu- ments should be subnitted to the District for review prior tO reoo?dation of the final Bap. All lots abutting the proposed flood control channel sbould be elevated above 100 year flood water surface. 0ffsite storm flows trtbutar~ to the property for~ the east should be collected and safely conveyed through the property to Santa Gertrudis Creek. 7. 0astra drainage facilities located outside of road right of ~ay should be contained within drainage easeneats above on the final nap. A note should be added to the final nap ateting, e~rainage easeBents shall be kept free of buildin[s and obstruct/caBs. 8. 0ffsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easeBents obtained frou the affected property cesar(s). The doounentCs) should be recorded and a copy subsifted to the ~lstrict prior to recordation of the final nap. All Iota should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or'an adequate outlet. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting ?ract 2262? Narch 9, 1~88 10. The 10 year storm flow should be contained w/thin the curb &rid the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these or~terLa is exceeded, additional drainage facilities Ihould be installed. 11. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows. Additional emergency escape should also be provided. 12. 13. A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property o~ners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for reviev prior to the recordation of the final map. ! Evidence of a viable maintenance mechanism should be sub- mitred to the District and County for review and approva! prior to recordation of the final map. 15. ?empacsty erosion control measures should be iuplemented immediately following roufh grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facilities. A copy of the Improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review Bud Ipprovll prior to recorda- tion of,the final map, Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Ch~ang of this office It 714/78702333. Very truly yours, Rancho Pacific Engineering [ENNETH L. ED¥&RD$ H. KASHU~A r Civil Engineer RC:bab RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CAUFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY GLEN J. NEI~IAN ~ CHIEF 1-31-90 ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT LAURIE DOBSON TR 22627 - HINOR CHANGE ~2 -AHENDED ~1 Phnninl & F.~tneertM Office 4080 Lemon Street, S~ite Riverside, CA 92501 (714) 787.66O6 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances end/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4'x2{") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with nopetrion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: #I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department." The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible build/ngmaterial being placed on an individual lot. M~TIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final top, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Fl~e Department, · cash ~ of $400.00 per lot/unit as mitigation for fire l=otection J~npacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he/she may enter into · written ·greement with the County deferring said payment to the t/me of issuance of · build/rig pez~t. All quest. tons regarding the meaning of the condit/ons shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist ,..__~ ~--~ County A~lmin~rative Gerttar · 4080 Lemon Street. 2ncl Floor '_ _~ _~-~ ¢ ¢ River~i0e, Galifoml 92501-3661 2uly 26, ~988 Rivers&de County Plann£ng Department Attentiont David Wahlgren County Administrative Center Riverside° CA 92501 RE: Vest£ng Tract 22627, A~end e2 Ladies and Gentlemen: The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety has the following con~nents and conditions: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- s~te signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section .L9o6 of Ordinance 348o Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minJ3num $' side yard letback. Nechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum S' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. Zngrmn, Director DEPARTMENT OF BUZLDZNG AND SAFETY ~ull~ng In~mcUon (714) 7~7.,8480 · A~lmint~mtion ('/14) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTNENT GRADING SECTION R C;- VED F57 0 1 TO: FRON: DATE: RE: APN PLANNING ! LAURIE DOBSON SAN D. GONZALEZ January 29, 1990 VTR 22627 - NC ~2 919-350-022, 025 The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, %he "Grading Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are incluOed. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. All grading shall conform to Chapter 70 of ~he Uniform Building Code as amended by Orcdinance 457. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safe~y Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater than or equal ~o 3' and/or cut slopes greater than or equal to 5' in vertical height wi:h grass or ground cover. Slopes that exceed 15' in vertical height are ~o be provided with shrubs and/or trees per count ordinance 457, see form 284- 47. Landscape plans are to be signed by a registered landscape architec= and bonded per the requirements of Ordinance 457, see form 284-47. Grading in excess of 199 cubic yards wf11 require performance security to be posted with the Building and Safety department, The proposed retaining walls, shown on the conceptual grading plan, will require separate.permits and shall be designed by a registered civil engineer - unless ~hey conform to ~he. County Standard Retaining Wall designs shown on Building and Safety Department forms 284-197. NOTE: For ~he final grading plan, please'provide the applicable information form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, and 284-46. Thank you. RiVERSiDE COUnC.u PLAnninG DEPARClTIErlC DAT~: ~inul~ 22, 1988 lutldlng end bfe~y Surveyor o Dive Duda bad Departnent lllllth o ILulph Luchs Fire Protection flood Control Dtstrtct Fish & Gime LAFCO, S Petsle3~ U.S. PostJ1 Service o Ruth E. Divtdson RECEIVED k'.. .,~ FEB ~ 1~88 I~LOMM OB~E~.'.~TORY IMncho Cilt¢. ¥ater SoutMon Clllf. Edtson Southern C11t f. Gu General Telephone Dept.. of Trlnapo~tatlon f8 Temcula Unt on El$tnore Unton gt,. hlomr Comtsstoner Bres$on VESTING TRACT 22627/C~4~$£ OF ZONE Sl19 - (To-l) - E.A. 32361 - Pancho P&ctflc Engineering - 14urrletl Area - Fqrst Supe~vlsorlal Oistrtct - ~rth & ~uth of ~ * 53 ec~ tn~ 223 lots - (q~QU~ST CZ To ~lnge the ~ne f~ Ro3.R-3oR-c ~ R-2 & R-S) - ~d ~9 - A.~. ~9035~022-024.025 Please revlev the case described ibove, 81ong vlth the ertlchad clse top. A Lind DirtsIon Corottree mettrig his been tentattvel~ scheduled for Sirch 10, 2988. If cleors, tt v111 then go to Iwhllc he&rtng. Your cornants end rtcomendlttons Irt reouested ~'1or SiKh 3, 1988 to In oryJer that u~y tnclude then In the st~ff report for thts Imrttcul&r case. Should you have ony questions regirdt~ this 1tin, please do not hasttire to contact David VahlQre~ it 787-1363 1Illlifter DATE: 2/2/88 SIGNATURE PLEASE print nmul end tttle b~WtolAJl(.ltl~t DLrector/Palouar 4080 L~id(~l~l fqTRFFT P Irl ~ dfp~)(lit rbJ~t.q ~TmI:I:T I~C~M :~C2~ CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY O/liCK O1 ?NE OllieTaB F&LOMAi OtSIIVATOIY leA.J4 v~thio the sane .quirtnS the use of line-pressure ladins vapor learns for street LtshtLu8, u stipuhted b7 the liverside County Board of Supervisors. Ue request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that My be emploTed on this property be Bads consistent v~th the spirit of the decKsion ef the Board of Supstylists vhtch b intended to uitlsate the adverse effects ouch facilities have on~he astronoutcal research at PaleBar. Bouef~c~a2 stops to that end bclude: 1. Use the uiniumn~otrnt of liKht needed for the tuk. 2. Orient end shield light to prevent direct Ul~ard llluu~natton. Turn off lights at 11:00 pa. (or earlier) unh., In coBmercia1 applications, the associated business h ooeu past that t~e, in vhic~ case the lights should be turned off at closing. Use 2a~*pressure sodinn Imps for roadways, vslkvays, equtpuent 7ards, parking lots, security end other 8tuil&r applications, These l~ghts Bend not be turned off at ~1:00 p.u. For further infatuation, call (818) 356-6035. Robert J. Bruuto Alebrent D~teetor" :IiVE:I iDE COUrlCu. F)LAFIFlinG DEPA::IQiIErlc IMT[: ~8nmry 22, 1988 TO: Assessor lutldtng Ind bfet~ Surveyor - hve Dude Iold Depa~tmnt 01881th - hilph Laths F~Fe Protection flood Control Olstrtct Ffsh t Gone LAFCO, S PItSlay g,S, Postal hrvlce- Ruth £, hvtdson Rancho Cilt¢. Miter Southern Ca14f. [dtson Southern Ca11 f. ~as 6eneril Telephone Dept. of Tr&nsportitton f8 Timecull LMton Elstnore Unton #t. Palomar Comtsstoner Bresson VESTING TRACT 22627/C~ANGE OF ZONE Sl19 - (Tm-1) - E.A. 32361 - hncho Pactftc Engineering - ~rrte~ Area * Ftrst ~tsortll Otstr1~ - ~th & ~uth of ~lrt~, ~St of Vtl' Lo~ - R*I,R*3,RoS b~ - S3 Ic~ tn~ 223 lots * (~EQ~ST CZ To ~lqe h ~ f~ R-I,R-3,R*S ~ R-2 t R-S) - ~ Zig * A.~. glg-35~0220024,02S ¥1eese revle~ the use described above,' along vtth the ittlched clse mlp. A Land Dtvtston Co~tttee meettrig his been tenUttvely scheduled for/Mrch 10, 1988. If tt clears, tt ~11 then go to ~uhllc heartrig. Tour cements Ind ~Bcomend~ttons are reouested prtor Hitch 3, 1988 to tn order that m~y tnclude them In the stiff repo~t for thts BIrtlcul&r use. Should ~ou hive o~y questions regardtn~ thts 1to% please ~ not hist~ ~ c~tact hvtd gihlQ~ it 787-1363 The ElsIBom Unlou Itgh School Dtstrlct f&cllltles are evetoM end our educltloM1 prigruBs seriously ImF4cted by IncreastIo studnet populatloe c~used. k7 Iou Nsldenttll, comertill e~d lidustrl&l constructton. TberefoN, pursuant tm GI11for~la 6ovenmmt C4M Sect~o~ SW of M 1tZ6 ~md Sl :~r/, tMs dlstrtct levle_Sl fee aglt.~_ t I.!! ..me develolme~t projects Idtktu Its boundaries. and tttle 4O8O LEMON STREET. e~ FLOOR RrVERSJD~ GI3.IFORNL~ 12501 OASIS STREET. ROOM 304 INDIO. CALIFORNIA 02201 July ~$, 1988 14F. Richard NatHoer, Super~Ls~ng Planner 4080 Laden Street, 9th Floor SUBJECT: VestLng Tentative Tract Hap Hunbar 22627 The following sunnarLzes our f~nd~ngs regarding the f~scal Lapact in&lys~s for the prelect ident~f~ed above. The appendix attached sunnsr~zes the basic Issumpt~ons used ~n the analysLs. Please note that these results reflect the current levels of se~vLce provided by the County based on F~scal Year 1986 - 308? actual costs (per capita factors) and DepartBartell and Auditor-Controller review of operations and facility costs for services revLewed using case study analys~s. Staff to the Growth FLsca! Iepact Task Force and Departlents are currently reviewing service levels provLded and the need to Xncresse the levels of service. Current fXnd~ngs are that ex~stLng levels of service are not adequate in lost cases. Should the desired level of seduce be utilized Ln the f~scal analys~s parleyed, ~c woul~ a~f~can~y lncrease ~he cos~s 8ssoc~l~ed w~h th~s developsent. COU~ FU~ (Operations ~nd HaLltenants) FISCAL XHPACT AFTER BUXLDOUT CtMULATXVE FISCAL ~34PACT AT BUILDOU~ Covnt~GenerLt F~re (17,7S7) ($63) "($11,S21) Io&d fund (84,820) ($16,3S0) 814,096 ($?,436) (ll2~) $6,533' RobroT. Amkz~ml Ad,.~/Ir,,,4 Cenm 4010LEM~STIIZT · LIllEFLOOr · IIM:RS.I.~IlS01 · ~i4}I'WI/-IM4 The following special circumstances apply to this 2. The developer assumptions included a factor of 28.?$% of income used for taxable sales. CAO staff utilized factor of 22.5%', which is closer to the countywide average. 2. Please note the attached letter, dated June 29, 1988, frae the Riverside City and County Public Library concerning this prolite. 3. Flood Control staff has indicated that flood contra! facll~ties constructed within Zone ~ are unlikely to be sufficiently funded for maintenance costs. Current estlBates ~ndicate that funding shortages should occur for the next ten years. Suggested mtt~gation measures include · cash deposit by the prolite developer oF use of an assessment mechanism. The amount o~ deposit would be determined b~ a present value analysis and pro, act t~m~ng. The cost of ma~ntlLn~ng flood conitel facll~ties not be known until f~nal design phases. Mhen facility have been fully ldent~fied. Flood Control staff therefore, condition p:o~ect approvals to ~dentify a of f~nancing facility maintenance and operation necessary) pr~or to recordation of aubdiv~sions. needs Beans Based on the analysis and assuming that the average sales price of the units w~ll be S144,166, overall Vest~n~ bu~dout of S3,222. After buildout, an annual negative f~scal ~upict to the County current ~evels of service. Xnitial Review BY:.. ReviewApproved By: Riverside : Libra.,-y /.-- #r. levin lughfi BANPAC 17447 Enterprise Circle West Temocula, CA 02300 sear Hr. Hughfie SOBJECTs VESTING TE3qTATIVE TRACT 22627-RANCHO CALIFORNIA (2NDILEV~SXONpoF Mr. Hughes) 3 am writing in respone to your request for infanteSion re- garding the impact oF a proposed project upon library service. The proposed project would adversely affect existing library services. The increase in population to be served would require an Increase in funding ~o the County Library to ulnasin the current level of service. However, the current level oF service has been recognized as substantially inadequate. The attached charts show how the urrent nutd)e; of voluneo per capita and the current equate eet per capita are inadequate and have declined during the last decade due to the lapact of rapid population growth throughout the County. See attached ~harts (Appendix C and The fiscal impact of n additional 600 persons (223 dwelling 1)maintain the current, laidequate level of service only and to lJprovldo the desired level of service. The desired level is inclusive of the curren~lml. ~acllitioo (one time coot eely) 'C01 loot lol~- (volme (ooo ooet -.". Sel)t~a! for hclliti, 'and Collection · (one tl# ooetonly) Saintsin Current Level of Service ~ AJ.6Jz Provide Dos/red Level of Service 17,406 (annual ongoing oolt) $ S,S0i $ 11,340 Letter to~&NP&¢, e22S27, I/2~/Ie, Page TheBe The aaoeeeuent of · library facLlitles and ·oilactions fee in.~0~0 d~llare at a_~oet of $123 per residential unit to ma~ntaxn the current level of service, or $27! per reelden- · ial malt to ~rov/de the dealred level of ·erv/ce. The deterulnatioa that t~e_ proJe~t'· eotluated easeseed valuation uill provide at least SeeS00 per Fear in It88 doll·re to the County Ll~rar~ Diorriot to finance ongoing expenses at the current level of service, or $11,340 per ~ear to fLnance angelrig expeneeo at the de·ired level of ·ervin·. feel free to contact me at (?14)782-$213, If you have further queerions. lAncerelM, Auth gncloeureo, Appendix C and D act Linda Wood, Llbrar~ Director '~oru.Caouette, leniorAdainlotretiveAnal¥ot &ppendlx ¢ Wear Populat.Joq' ~er 3004 . ' 43J,4S2 ~,1t) old 3ll6 diS, ISO .40~100 003 OZ/AR{~ fLTT PL"R CAPJTA - 4,C,,,,A:,{~, IIRAIC! Ir~IRARII~. . f4~ire feet " &fbrory ~ l] J{~,6'74 84 4J ),4S3' ?,J, l J) 4S1,74S Y 4OS,SSO : I~uere feet · er CoDSto o:~? * e)4 · RiVER)iDE £OUI1C¥ PL nnirl DEP R IitErlC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: ENVIRONMENTAL ,'~SSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER: r~C~CT CASE t'fPE~ NUMeERS(s): STANDARD EVALUATION MODULENUMBER(s): ~c[ I~UVIE OF PERSON(e) PREPARING E.A.: ~"~--' ~-'~ [t~'i~c~er% L PfiOJECT PJFORMATION A. DESCRIPTION (include proposed minimum lot size and uses as ~opliceble): ~ ~ V'¥, ~..~: B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES C. ASSESSOR*S PARCEL NO.(s): U. EXISTING ZONING: ~--~'- IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? E PROPOSED Z(~NING: ~Y~-"~ C~c~ R-'~ IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? F. STREET REFERENCES: SECTION, tOWNSHIP. RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETlING OF THE PROJECT SITE MID ITS SURROUNDINGS: IL COMPREHEH.~!VE GENERAL PLAN OPEN 8PACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATION Check the appropriate option(s) below and proceed accordingly. r-] All or pad of fhe i~oject site b in "Adopted Specific Plans," "REMAP" or "Rancho Villegee Community Policy Neas". Complete Secfionl III, IV (El ~nd C only), V and VI. ~ All or part of tl~e peoJecl site IB in "kea~ No! Designated is Open Space". Complele Sections III, IV (A, B end D only), V and VL [] All or part of lh,~ projecl ~lte'has an Open Space and Conaervation designation other th~n those mentioned above. Compl,te ,e~.-'tions RI, IV (A, B, and E only), V and VI. ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS AND RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Indicete Ihe ns~Jre of !he propceed I&*~d Lme as dete~nined ~ the cle~crlptions Es found in Com~~ G~'~ersI Plan Figure Vl.3 (Circle O~e). This In~tion Is n4cessB~y to c~ine the Ipprol:~te ~ use mjitibility ~ltings in Section III.B cHatcat Ellent~ Normal-High Rtalc Normal-Low Risk wllh a y~ts (Y) or no (N) whether any envkonmefital hazard and/or rseource ilsuss sly dgnlficentty affect c~ be affected bythep~. NlrefertmcedrKaure~lrecordainedlntheCoff~GefiemJlPlln. For any ilsue m&'kedye~(Y)write dim sources, Kiefic~s cof~ultecI, f#~lin~ of fica and any mitiglUon measures und(~ Section V. AJlio, where Indicated, HAZARDS Alctuist-Pdolo Special Studle~ or County F~ult H~zard Zone~ (Fig. Vt.1) NA PS U R (Fig. VI.3) UCluefaction Potential Zorte (Fig. Vt.1) NA S PS U R (Fig. VIA) Groundshaking Zone (Fig Vt.1) NA S PS U R (Fig. VI.5) SIc~es (Riv. Co. 800 Scale Slope Maps) 15." landslide Risk Zone (Riv. Co. 8CX) Scale Seismic Mips or On-site Inspection) 16. ~ N~ S PS U Iq (Fig. VI.S) .~ I:1ock~11 Hazird (On-site Inspection) 17. Expansive Soils (U.S.D.A. Soil 18. ~ Conservation Service Soil Surveys) lg. Service Soil Surveys) . Wind Er~oslon & Blowsand (Fig. V1.1. Ord. 460, Sec. 14.2 & Ord. 484) Dam InundaUon Area (Fig. VI.?)~'~,L,~ '~e~-~ 24. -' Other Flccclp~nina (Fig. Vt.?) 25. Other NA U R (Fig. VI~) 12..t~ Airport No~e (Fig. 11.18.5, t1.18.11 & Vt.12 & 1~84 AICUZ Report, M.A.F.B.) NA A B C D (Fig, V1.1 t) 13...b/._ Railroad Noise (Fig. Vt.13 - V1.16) NA A B C VID.1 (Fig, VI.11) 14. ~ Highway Noise (Fig. 7 - VI.29) NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) Other Noise NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) Project Generated Noise Affecting Noise Serialrive Uses (Fig. VI.11) Noise Sefisttive Project (Fig. VI.11) Air Quality Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Air Quality Water Quality Impacts From Pro~ect Project Sensitive to Wator Quality 22. ~ Hazardous Materials and Wastes 23. H~zardoua Fire Area (Fig. VI.30 - Vl.31 ) RESOURCES In or N~. ,~r an Agricultural Preserve (Riv. Co. Agrk:vltu~ I.~nd Conver~tion 34.~_ Contn,~! Maps) Veget~t~,n (Fig. VI.38 - VI.40) Mineral Resources (Fig. VIA1 - VI.42) 36. ", 31 Er~gy ne~,umes (Fig. Vi.43. Vi~44) 37. -', Scenic Highways (Fig. VI.4S) Historic Reso~JrCeS (Fig. Vl.32 - Vl.33) Archaeological Resources (Fig. Vl.32 - Vl.33 & Vl.46 - VI.48) Pll~)ntol~ical Resovrces (1:'ldeontological Resources M~o) Other Definitions for Land Use Suitability snd Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - Nol Appllc,,~e S · Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - Generally Urmultable R - Re~ A - Generally Acceptable B - Condltionelly Acceptable C - Generally Un&cceplable D - Land Use Discouraged IV. LAND USE DETERMINATION m.m r iF ,r,': .m,,', . 4.' COMMUNITY POUCY AREA, IF " ' 5. COMMU~IY PLAN, IF ANY: '-' 8. COMMUI%fTY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY: For aft projects, inidcata with a yes ("Y) or no (N) whether any public fucillties and/or sewices issues may significantly effect or be affected by the pn:)posal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For ;Lny issue marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V. PUBUC FACIUTIES AND SERVICES ~ec. V ExisUng, Ptanr~::l & Required Roads) Bike Tn~s (F'~. IV.12 - N. 13) Water (,~ gency Letters) Fire S~. trices (F~g. !V.16 - N.18) Sheriff ,qewtcee (Fig N.17 - N.18) Schod,~ (F'~. N.17 - N.18) Solid W~,~e (Fig. IV.17 - N.18) Parks ~d Recreation (Fig. N.19 - N.20) EQuestrian Trails (Fig. IV, 19 - IV.24/ Riv. Co. 800 Scale Ecluestr[an Trail M~ps) Utilities (Fig. IV.25 - IV.26) Ubraries (Fig. IV.17 - !V. 18) I-leafb~ Services (Fig. IV. 17 - IV. 18) Alqx)rts (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4, 11.18.8 - !1.18.10 & IV.27 - IV.36~ Disaster Preparedness City Sphere of Ir~uence If fdl or part c~ ff,,~ project is Iocate~J In "Adopted Soecific Plans", "FIEMAP" or "Rancho Villages Community Policy Aree8'*, review kt detail the specific policies applying to Ihe proposal, find Gomplete the following: 1. Slste the reft. vent land use designetlon(s): Bi~ed on ~jt~ hltlal study, is the proposal cofislstent with the policies and designaUo~s of the appropriate document, and therefore consistant with the Comprehensive General Plan? ff not, explain: ~ IV. LAND USE DETERMINATION (oontlnued) ' D. # tJl or I:mrt of the I:~OJ~ ~ il In "Am~ not De~lgrmted ~ Open ~PaCe", I~d H ~ ~ ~ ~m~ ~, ~p~te quedions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7. Complete questlotto 4, 5, 6 rand 7 If It i~ in m C, ommunity Plan. 3. I D.1 differs from 0.2, will !he difference be resolved It lhe development Itage? Explain: land u~ type 4. Community Ptan designation(s): IS Itte proposed project consistent with the policies and designations of the Community Ptan? ff nc:4, explain: 6. Is the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses? ff not, exl~kl: %(e/'~ 7. Based on I~is inlJal study, il ff~e proposal consistent wtth the Comprehef~ive General Plan? II nol, reference by Secticw~ lnd Issue Number Itmse Issues identif~g Im:x)nsistencies: ~/o,o E. I MI or part of the project lite b in In Open Space Ind Con,elation designaticm, complete the following: 1. M the c~sl~s):. 2. I. the i~'posaJ consistent with the desJgrmtk)n(s)? ff not, expl.Jn: Based on this Initial I!ucly, il lhe ~ conBisoN with the Compmhenlive General Plan? ff noL reference by Sectiota and Issue Number those ismms identifying Inconsistencies: V. INFORMATION ~OURCE$, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES A. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: IIECTION/ INFORMATION NO. REQUIRED DATE DATE ~DEQUACY INFORMATION INFORIV!~TION REQUESTED RECEIVED (Y[S/NO,DATE) eo For each Issue marked yes (Y) under Sections III.B and N.B, identify lite ,~ction and issue number and do the following, in the format as shown below: 1. Li~I all eddltionaJ relevant data ~ource$, Including agencies consulted. 2. State all findings of fact regarding environmental concerns. ;3. ~'tate specific mitigation measures, If identifiable without r~:luiring an environmental impact repod (E.I.R.) 4. If additional Information i1~ required before the environmental a~eument can be completed, refer to Subsection A. 5. If additional sheets are needed to complete this ~--tlon, check the box It the end of the section and attach SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEApSURES: ¥. INFORMATION SOURCES, FINDING8 OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEASURE8 (continued) .~.CTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: See allached pages. · Vl. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: ~' The I:woject will not have a significant effect on the environment and · Negative Declaration may be [] The project could have · a~nlficant effect on the environment; however. there wfil not be · significant effect In thi~ case becaue~ the mitigation measures described in Section V have been applied to the ~oject and · Negative Declaration may be prepared. (or) [] The project may have · ~tgnificant effect on the environment ~nd an Environmental Impact Report Prepared by ITEM NO. 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Engineering Department ~ March 26, 1991 Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-1 PREPARED BY: Douglas M. Stewart RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Final Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-1, Amended No, 2. subject to the Conditions of Approval, DISCUSSION: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, a two {2) phase project, was originally submitted to the Riverside County Planning Department on February 10, 1988. The Vesting Tentative Tract Map Amended No. 2 was approved by the County Planning Commission September 14, 1988, and by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. A tract map revision and extension was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission on February 25, 1991. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627-1 contains 93 lots on 19.60 acres. This phase is located at the northeast corner of North General Kearny Road and Nicolas Road. The applicant is Lyon Communities, Inc. The following fees have been paid for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627-1: Signal Mitigation Area Drainage Fee Fire Mitigation Fee $ 13,950.00 24,541.77 37,200.00 This Tract Map is not part of a Specific Plan nor is it governed by a Development STAFFRPT\FVT22627-1 I This Tract Map is not part of a Specific Plan nor is it governed by a Development Agreement. Requirement of Quimby fees I Park fees) were not historically conditions of approval by the County of Riverside until some time on or after June, 1988. Requirement of Quimby fees was not adopted and is not required as a condition of approval. Water, sewer, and drainage improvements have been completed at the project site. Street improvements are approximately half completed. Bonding of street improvements, a warranty bond for improvements, and monument bond will be required for Vesting Tract Map No. 22627-1. Faithful Labor and Performance Material Street and Drainage Warranty of Improvements Survey Monuments $333,000.00 $67,400.00 30,228.00 $166,500.00 SUMMARY: Staff recommends that the City Council APPROVE Final Vesting Tract Map No, 22627-1, Amended No, 2, subject to the Conditions of Approval, GH:ks Attachments: 2. 3. 4. 5. Development Checklist Location Map Copy of Map Conditions of Approval Fees & Securities Report STAFFRPT\FVT22627-1 2 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Final Vestinq Tract Map No. 22627-1 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Traffic Signal Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Library ) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. 25 (Planning) N/A N/A Condition No. 10 (Roads & Surveyor) N/A Condition No. 15 ( Planning ) Condition No. 14 (Planning) STAFFRPT\FVT22627-1 CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP / TRACT NO. 22627-1 DATE February 22, 1991 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY Streets and Drainaqe $ 333,000.00 160,000.00 181,000.00 674,000.00 Water $ Sewer TOTAL $ *Maintenance Retention (10% for one year) *(or Bonds if work is completed) Monument Security City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs RCFC Drainage Fee Due Signalization Mitigation Fee - SMD #9 Road and Bridge Benefit Fee Other Developer Fees Plan Check Fee Due Inspection Fee Due Monument Inspection Fee Fee Paid To Date (Credit) Total Inspection/Plan Check Fees Due MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY $ 166,500.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,S00.O0 $ 337,000.00 $ 67,400.00 $ 30,228.00 $ -0- $ 24,541.77 $ 13,950.00 $ -0- $ -0- -0- 23.237.41 -0- 23,237.41 -0- STAFF R PT\FVT22627-1 · ,, ..v'::~, ,I,/ ¥'~," %.'~.>-- Clubhouse · ' ~': ,'") f'" '1 ~' ! -~ , / ..... ",,,,,I.~ ~.., ~ 0 II ~t ' ~:.~,,, ~., ~ o~,~y .~, . . ~ . ~ ','y~..~ .~ ~ ~..~,',~,,~ .:... :,,. .~ ~ ~ ~ ,/ ,, ,, . , ,~, ~ ~l~rltl~S tI ~ ..~ ..... ;~ ~: WINCHESTER ~, ...... ;~s,eo ~n~,s COLLECTION '" ~'~.~{~1~1[ D '~"G. ",,',~,., or O~ , ) :,:, ! \ \ Country Club Project Site I · £1ev. 17 L~_~kunk 1647 Ft. . ~1 -- ZIP CODE DOUNDARY ?~ i:."'.".'~o~,~-lll~tl~:.~.~,.~..,:~:¢l~,..~..~' CaM~!Io ~ ~'", ~ . C,ELO , ~~: ~ OF ZONE ~. 51.]~..-~ST]NG TEflTAT~VE TRACT NO. 2~627 - ~l~t~ - First Su~rvisorial District - ~lurriet~ Area - 53 ~ Lo~ - Scale A - REQUEST: R-R to R-2 and ~-5. ~la~i~ C~i~sion and SUff Reckend: ~TI~ o~ the N~ative Declaration for Environmentai ~.ssessment NoJ ~361 ~s~ on ~e findings incorporated in the enviro,~mental ass~t and the conclusion that the propos~ project will not have significant effect on the environment; and AP~ of ~HANGE OF ZONE NO. 5119 fr~ R-~ to R-2 ~nd R-5 in accordance ~ ~hibit 2, bas~ upon the findings and conclusions inc~orated in the Planning C~ission minutes dated Sept~ber lJ., 1988; and APP~V~ of VESTING TENTATIVE T~CT )~0. 22627, A~n6ed )~o. 2, subjects.to ~ at~ch~ co~itions, bas~ on the findings ant conclusions incor~at~ in ~ Planning C~ission minutes dated Sept~ber l~, 1988. - ~.,~'W~',~,y? ~ '--'£/'~.'~%; . Rj~er S. Streeter, Plann/)~t~ Director NOV 2 8 i 88. RtVER:=~ DE. COUNTY P{.ANNING ., ~ ~ly ca=rie~ by ~ni~us vote, IT h'AS O~E~D that the a~ve ~ ~~ i~ ~~e~ as =ec~n~ and ~at County Counsel is dire=te~ ~o ~=e.~are ~he necessary ordinance for adogtion. Aye= ~r~, D~lap, ~ni~o8, Yo~glove and ~r~on ~= ~r~ -- ~rald A. ~oney 10. RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 6, 1990 (AGENDA ITEM 2-2 - Tape 1A) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 22627, MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 - CSL Engineering - Murrieta Area - First Supervtsortal District - north of Nicholas Rd, west of Via Lobo - MINOR CHANGE REQUEST: Change product type, a precise plot plan Hearing was opened at 9:45 a.m. and was closed at 9:48 a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, Minor Change No. 2 based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. Vesting Tentative Tract Map 22627, Minor Change No. 2 is a request to change the product type in the final phase of the R-2 tract. The site is located north of Nicholas Road and east of North General Kearney Road in the City of Temecula. Currently the site is vacant and the surrounding uses include single family residential, existing construction and vacant land. The site is zoned R-2 and R-5. The Minor Change is a request to change the product type (precise plot plan, floor plans, elevations) on Phase F. This change would affect 126 residential lots on 27.4 acres. Staff said no changes were made in the lot lines nor in the street lay out. As noted in the staff report, the site shows 8-16 dwelling units per acre in the Southwest Area Community Plan. Staff cannot explain this discrepancy even though the original map was approved for 4.16 dwelling units per acre. The B-16 dwelling units per acre only covers the final phase of the case in question and the vesting tract map is already approved. Staff feels that the minor change is consistent with the approved map and the density it was originally approved at is considered to be appropriate with the surrounding designations. TESTIMONY OF PROPONENT John Able, 2900 Adams Street, Riverside representing the applicant concurred with the recommendations of staff. There was no one present in opposition. The hearing was closed at 9:48 a.m. FINDINGS AND ODNCLUSIONS: Vesting Tentative Tract 22627 was originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988; the original approval consisted of 219 residential lots and one open space lot on 53 acres; subsequent unttization divided the tract into two phases; Phase I consists of 93 lots on 25 acres; Phase F consists of 126 lots on 27.3 acres; Minor Change No. 1 to Tract 22627 changed the approved product type on Phase I; Minor Change No. 2 to Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type on Phase F; the site is vacant and graded; surrounding land uses include vacant land and single family residential; the site is zoned R-2 and R-5; surrounding zoning includes R-l, R-2, R-R, and S-P; the site is designated 8-16 du/ac on the Southwest Area Con~nunity Plan (SWAP}; the Southwest Area Comn~ntty Plan designation affects only Phase F on Tract 22627 and was applied after the original tentative map RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 6, 1990 · was approved at 4.16 du/ac; the City of Temecula considers SWAP to be advisory in nature; SWAP Category I policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes; the product change request is not inconsistent with the approved tentative map which is compatible with area development; the Local Recreational Trail shown along Santa Gertrudis Creek on SWAP was not requested since it was not on the original tentative map and such a request would necessitate a redesign of the map not allowed by a minor change application; new environmental assessments are not undertaken on minor change applications; there is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or which will be studied within a reasonable time; there is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan and the project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. The proposed minor change is consistent with the land use policies of the Southwest Area Community Plan and with the Comprehensive General Plan and the proposed minor change is consistent with the approved tentative map and is compatible with area development. MOTION: Upon motion by Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Donahoe and unanimously carried, the Commission recommended approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, Minor Change No. 2 based on the findings and conclusions in the staff report and subject to the conditions of approval. DA ITEM 2-3 - Tape 1A, lB) 5625 - EA 34388 - Rick Engineering Co. - Sedco/Wildomar Area - First S~ 'visorial District - 36.8± acres, southwest of Palomar St, northwest of McVicar - R-R to R-l, etc. WITH VESTING TRACT O. 25247 - 106 lots - 36.8± acres - Schedule A Hearing opened at .m. and was closed at 10:OB a.m. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ado n of the Negative Declaration for EA 343BB based on the conclusion that the t will not have a significant effect on the environment and approval of Chan Zone 5625 from R-R to R-1 in accordance with Exhibit 2 and approval of Tentative Tract 25427, Amended ~1 based on the finding and conclusions in the ff report and subject to the conditions of approval. Change of Zone and Vesting Tentative Tract 25247 are concurrent requests to change the zonin 36.B acres from R-R to R-1 and to subdivide the parcels into log residential ~. The subject site is located southwest of Palomar Street and northw~ McVicar street in the Sedco/Wildomar zoning area. The surrounding land u~ are vacant land, single family residential and some limited agricultural uses. rrently the site is zoned R-R w~ile the surrounding zoning is R-R and R-X. ~ubJect site is designated for residential use at 2-4 dwelling units per the Southwest Area Community Plan as well as the surrounding properties. of concern that were identified in the environmental assessment included not ~rom Palomar Street and the regional trail easement along the Wildomar )l. Staff at this point amended the following condition. 6 Zoning Area: Murrieta, Rancho California Supervisorial District: Regional Team: One HZNOR CHANGE NO. 2 - VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT 22627 Planning Commission: 6-06-90 Agenda Item: 2-2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNENT STAFF REPORT 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Applicant: Engineer/Rep.: Type of Request: Location: Existing Zoning: Surrounding Zoning: Site Characteristics: Area Characteristics: Comprehensive General Plan Designation: 10. Land Division Data: 11. Agency Recommendations: 12. Letters: 13. Sphere of Influence: Van Daele Development CSL Engineering Change approved precise plot plan, floorplans, elevations on final phase North of Nicholas Road,. East of North General Kearney Road R-2, R-5 R-2, R-5, R-R, R-A-l/2 Vacant, graded, mode rate 1 y sloping Vacant, hilly, single family residences Land Use: Category I - Southwest Area Community Plan Density: 8-16 DU/AC Open Space/Cons,: Areas Not Designated Total Acreage: 27.4 Total Lots: 126 residential, 1 open space DU Per Acre: 4.6 DU/AC Proposed Min. Lot Size: 4627 square ft. Road: 2-06-90 Health: 2-02-90 Flood: 1-22-90 Fire: 1-31-90 Building & Safety Land Use: 7-26-88 Grading: 1-29-90 Opposing/Supporting: None received In City of Temecula ANALYSIS: Proiect Backmround Vesting Tract 22627 was approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988 as a Restricted Single Family subdivision consisting of 219 residential lots and one open space lot. The original subdivision covered 53 acres north of Nicholas Road between North General Kearney Road and the northeastern Rancho ¢! TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 22627 HZNOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Report Page 2 Temecula line. SubseQuent unitization divided the tentative map into two phases, Phase ~ covering the eastern 25 acres .(93 lots) and Phase-'~ covering the western 27.3 acres (126 lots). Minor Change No. I to Tract 22627 changing the originally approved precise plot plan, floorplans, and elevations on Phase ! was previously approved . The site is located north of Nicholas Road and east of North General Kearney Road in what is now t~e City of Temecula. Proiect DescriPtion Minor Change No. 2 to Vesting Tentative Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type (precise plot plan, floorplans, elevations) on Phase F. The change affects 126 residential lots on 27.4 acres. No substantial changes were made to either 3or lines or street layout. land Use/ZoninQ The subject site is currently vacant and graded. Surrounding land uses consist of vacant land and single family residential. The site is currently zoned R-2 and R-5 as established by Change of Zone No. 5119. Surrounding zoning includes R-l, R-2, R-R, and Pro.iect Consistency The project site is designated for residential use at a density range of 8-16 DU/AC on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP). This 8-16 DU/AC designation covers only Phase F of Tract 22627 and all of TR 23128 south of Nicholas Road, The designation was applied after (11-28-90) the original tentative map was approved at 4.16 DU/AC and as such appears to contradict the approved subdivisions within the designation. In addition, since the site is within the City of Temecula, SWAP designations are advisory only. Southwest Area Community Plan Category I policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes. Staff considers this product change request to be clearly consistent with the approved tentative map and compatible with approved and recorded maps in the immediate area, including Phase I of Tract 22627 to the east. The Southwest Area Community Plan Recreational Trails and Bike Path map shows a Local Recreational Trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek. The tract is part of Assessment District 161 which shows plans for a concrete sided Channel with 1,5 to 1 slopes, Trail easements are TENTATIVE TRACT NAP NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Report Page 3 not practical immediately adjacent to channels with steep slopes and no easement was obtained on either the original tentative map or Minor Change No. 1. [n order to obtain such an easement, normally 14 feet wide, the entire tract layout would have to be shifted. This type of 'redesign would have exceeded the type of revision allowed under a minor change. Fnvironmental Anmlysis Minor Change requests are exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, therefore no new initial study was conducted· All environmental issues were addressed under the Environmental Assessment No. 32361 done for the original review of Tentative Tract Map No. 22627. FINDINGS: am Vesting Tentative Tract Z2627 was originally approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. The original approval consisted of 219 residential lots and one open space lot on 53 acres. Subsequent unitizstion divided the tract into two phases. Phases I consists of 93 lots on 25 acres. Phase F consists of 126 lots on 27.3 acres. Minor Change No. I to Tract 22627 changed the approved product type on Phase I. Minor Change No. 2 to Tract 22627 is a request to change the product type on Phase F. The site is vacant and graded. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and single family residential. The site is zoned R-2 and R-5. R-l, R-2, R-R, and S-P. Surrounding zoning includes The site is designated 8-16 DU/AC on the Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP)· The Southwest Area Community Plan designation affects only Phase F on Tract 22627 and was applied after the original tentative map was approved at 4.16 DU/AC. TENTATIVE TRACT HAP NO, 22627 HENOR CHANGE NO. 1 Staff Repo.r[ Page 4 10. The City of Temecula considers SWAP to be advisory in nature. 11. 12. SWAP Category ! policies allow development at less than the stated density range for land use compatibility purposes. The product change request is no~ inconsistent with the approved tentative map which is compatible with area development. 13. The Local Recreational Trail shown along Santa Gertrudis Creek on SWAP was not requested since it was not on the original tentative map and such a request would necessitate a redesign of the map not allowed by a minor change application. 14, 15. New environmental assessments are not undertaken on minor change applications. There is reasonable probability that the project will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or which will be studied within a reasonable time, 16. There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the project is ultimately inconsistent with the plan· 17. The project complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, CONCLUSIONS: The proposed minor change is consistent with the land use policies of the Southwest Area Community Plan and with the Comprehensive General Plan, The proposed minor change is consistent with %he approved tentative map and is compatible with area development. RFCOHNENDATZONS: APPROVAl of VESTING TENTATZVE TRACT NAP NO. 22627, NZNOR CHANGE NO. 2 based on %he findings and conclusions in the staff report and subjec= to the conditions of approval. LD:lgg 5/16/90 WINCHESTER PROPERT~-~ .. V- :~, 2 / ~ SP 213 .. ~_~ .'.' ~ ~ . ,- ~ .- ~.~." .. "~ . ~~ .~~-..~_ ,, II...-~ ~ - / ...:~ ...a ', ~ .' ". .' ,.. . ~ .. ..... ~r .~:~. , .... , ~ sp~. ~_ . ., , .... ... . . .,, '" ~ .-- ~'~-~ ~ ~! / ~.. ' ' - , . ~.. ~ ~ .~ . ~J C~cu~ NIC~AS RD. ARTERIAL I10~ ~ ~ :./.~q~ ~' RANCHO PACIFIC ENGINEERING MURRIETA E~ment N. GENERAL KERNEY RD.~ECONDARY--88' VAC. " ~ HILLS ~ U/C - .GR.ADING SCHOOL U/C VAC. CREEK 'CON'ST.' "V'A-C. -- OFFICE · "'::~ ~ RES. HILLS' SAND~': '-:-~- ' -' VAC. I PIT~ NURSERY' ~ BARNES ' ~ .- ~j. ~ , ~ ~ .~~ . .... ~ R__~ D~ II/~ .- - t~, ~, '~ ~'~~ ~ _ I l~P- RA~ ~iFIC ENGINEERING j "~ =A..,~ .A' ' P ' RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627, NINOR CHANGE No. 2 DATE: ANENDED NO. 1, CORRECTION NO. 1 EXPIRES: STANDARD CONDITIONS The following conditions of approval are for Tentative Tract No. 22627, Minor Change No. 2. The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside, its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards, or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627, which action is brought within the tim·period provided for In California Government Code, Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. [f the County fai. ls to promptly notify the subdivider of any such clatm, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. e The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This conditionally approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, of October 25, lg85 unless extended as provided by Ordinance No. 460. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor sub3ect to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Nap Act and Ordinance No. 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside County Surveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Butlding and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading if proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive gradtrig plan to the Department of Bulldtng and Safety· The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance No. 457 and as may be additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 2 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building an~ Safety prior to commencement of any grading outside of County maintained road right-of-way. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 2-06-90, a copy of which is attached. {Amended per Minor Change No. 2) All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to the approval of the Road C~issioner. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyance~ sha~l be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 2-02-90, a copy of which is attached. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control District's letter dated 7-27-88, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Ordinance No. 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement recommendations outlined in theCounty Fire Marshal's letter dated 1-31-90, a copy of which ts attached. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety Land Use Dlvtston transmittal dated 7-26-88, a copy of whtch is attached. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations outlined in the Department Building and Safety ~radtng Section transmittal dated 1-29-90, a copy of which is attached. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 3 18. 19, 20. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area Improvement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning Department approval. Any proposed phastng shall provide for adequate vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: ae All lots shall have a minimum size of 4726 square feet net. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance No. 460. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with additional area pursuant to Section 3.8B of Ordinance No. 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of'the R-2 zone. When lots are. crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provtded wtth other eroston control measures as approved by the Director of Butldtng and Safety. All street 11ghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be sho~n on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Butldtng and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive ~eneral Plan. Upon approval of this vesting tentative tract map, Tentative Tract Map No. 21430, as it pertains to the subject site, shall be null and void and of no further force or effect. (Amended by Planning Commission on 9-14-88) VESTZNG TENTATZVE TRACT NO. M[NOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 22627 21. Prior to the RECORDATION of the final map, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit written clearances to theRiverside County Road and SurveyDepartment that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department County Flood Control County Parks Department County Health Department County Planning Department Prior to the recordation of the final map, Change of Zone No. 5!19, shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. The Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel area Shall be shown as a numbered lot on the final map and shall be offered to the Riverside County Flood Control Distrtct for dedication. Any area between the channel and the Nicholas Road right of way shall be landscaped by the developer and maintained by a landscape maintenance district, CSA 143 or subsequent Temecula Community Services District. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) de Prior to recordation of the final subdivision map, the subdivider shall convey to the County fee simple title to all common open space areas, free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which tn the sole discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to the County accepting title to such areas, the subdtvlder shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of.the County Counsel: 1. A declaration of covenants, conditions, end restrictions; and, A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions, end restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 5 Thedeclaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions submit%e= for review shall (a) provide for a minimum term of 60 years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the o~ners of each Individual lot or unit as tenants in common, and (c) contain the following provisions verbatim: 'Notwithstanding any provision in this Declaration to the contrary, the following provision shall apply: The property owners' association established hereln shall, if doreen%, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, a% %he request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the County's demand, title to all or any part of the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhibit 'E ', attached hereto. The decision to require activation of the property owners' association and the decision to require that the association unconditionally accept title to the 'common area' shall be a% the sole discretion of the County of Riverside. In the event that the 'common area', or any part thereof, is conveyed to the property owners' association, the association, thereafter, shall own such 'common area', shall manage and continuously maintatn such 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prtor written consent of the Planning Director of theCounty of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. Theproperty owners' &ssoctation shall have the right to assess the owners of each Individual lot or untt for the reasonable cost of maintaining such 'common area', and she11 have the right to 1ten the property of any such ovner vho defaults in the payment of a maintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, shall be prior to all other liens recorded subsequent to the notice of assessment or other document creating the assessment lien. This Oeclaration shall not be terminated, 'substantially' amended, or property deannexed therefrom absent the prior vrttten consent of the Planntng 01rector of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-in-interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial' if tt affects the extent, usage, or maintenance of the 'common area'. VESTING TENTAT]:VE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 6 In the event of any confllct between this Declaration and the Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, if any, thts Declaration shall control." Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions, anU restrictions shall be recorded at the same ttme that the final map ts recorded. The developer shall comply with the following parkway landscaping conditions: Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall file an application with the County for the formation of or annexation to, a parkway maintenance district for parkway and s)ope landscape maintenance, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, unless the project is within an existing parkway maintenance district. Prior to the issuance of butldin9 permits, the developer shall secure approval of proposed landscaping and irrigation plans from the County Road and Planning Departments. All landscaping and irrigation plans and specifications shall be prepared in a reproducible format suitable for permanent filing with the County Road Department. 3. The developer shall post a landscape performance bond which shall be released concurrently wtth the release of subdivision performance bonds, guaranteeing the viability of all landscaping which will be installed prior to the assumption of the maintenance responsibility by the district. 4. The developer, the developer's successors-in-interest or assignees, shall be responsible for all parkway landscaping maintenance until such time as maintenance is taken over by the district. (Added per Minor Change No, 2) The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and irrigation systems until such time as those operations are the responsibilities of other parties as approved by the Plannlng Director. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 HINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 7 A final plan of development shall be submitted for Planning Department approval pursuant to Section ?.11g of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The final plan of develobment shall contain the following elements: a. The site's final grading plan. A final site plan showing the lots, building footprints, all setbacks, yard spaces and floor plan and elevation assignments to individual lots. Construction plans of the dwellings to be constructed in the subdivision. The plans shall be in a form suitable for submission to the Department of Building and Safety for plan checking· A typical mechanical plan showing the location and placement of mechanical equipment for individual dwellings. The required final plan of development shall be in substantial conformance with the project's approved grading plan, site plan, floor plans end elevations except as provided for in Section 7.11g(2). This subdivision maybe recorded in phases subject to the following: Proposed phasing, including phase boundaries, sequencing and floor plan selection, shall be subject to Planning Director's approval. Each proposal phase shall comply with the provisions of Section 7.11 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. If any phase of the subdivision will be developed with fewer than the approved.number of floor plans, the cumulative mix of floor plans resulting from the sequential recordation of phases shall comply with Section ?.1if(3) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Prior to the recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (EOS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECSshall be transmitted to the PlanningDepartment for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 8 22. The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'County Geologic Report No. 352 was prepared for this property and 1s on file at the Riverside County Planning Department. Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERNITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the Issuance of gradtrig permtts, detailed common open Space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Depart~nent for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the Permanent automatic irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle treatments, as approved by the Planning Director. Ut~lJties shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the stte. Landscape elements shall tnclude earth benalng, ground cover,. shrubs, and specimen trees in conjunction wtth meandering sidewalks, benches, and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning DepartJnent. e Landscaping plans shall Incorporate the use of spectmen accent trees at key vlsual focal potnts wtthln the pro3ac[. Where street trees cannot be planted wtthtn the right-of-way of tritertot streets and proSect parkways due to Insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outstde of the road right-of-way. Landscaping plans shall Incorporate nattve and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All extsttng spectmen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subJect property shall be shown on the pro3ect's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. All trees shall be mtnimumdouble-staked. Weaker and/or slow- gro~lng trees shall be steel-staked. VESTXNG TENTATIVE TRAL MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 9 NO. 22627 Six (6) sets of landscaping plans shall be submitted with a complete~ plot plan application form and the current processing fee to the Public [nformation section. (Added per Ninor Change No. 2) Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planning Director. Replacement trees-shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. )f the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of the tentative map grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval· The plan shall be used as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion and sedimentation during and after the grading process. Approximate time frames for grading and identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March. 3. Preliminary pad and' roadway elevations. 4. Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase. Grading plans shall conform to Board-adopted Hillside Development Standards: All cut and/or fill slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical height shall be modified by an appropriate combination of a special terracing (benching) plan, increase slope ratio (i.e., 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planting combined with irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a ftfteen (15) percent grade. All cut slopes located adjacent 'to ungraded natural terrain and exceed ten (10) feet tn vertical hetght shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. e The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where dratnage and stability permtt such rounding. Where cut and/or fill slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal · length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continuous, undulating fashion. VESTING TENTATIVE TRA MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 10 NO. 22627 23. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety· Prior to the issuance of BUILDING PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: No building permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer or the developer's successors-in-interest provide evidencs of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the Riverside County Department of Building and Safety as mitigation for public library development. Prior to the submittal of building plans to the Department of Building and Safety, an acoustical study shall be performed by an acoustical engineer to establish appropriate mitigation measures that shall be applied to individual dwelling units within the subdivision to reduce ambient interior noise levels to 45 Ldn. This report shall be submitted to and approved by the Riverside County Health Department, Division of Special Services. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) All building plans for all new structures shall incorporate all required elements from the subdivision's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. Prior to the issuance of building permits, composite landscaping and irri'gation plans shall be approved by the Planning Department. The plans shall address all areas and aspects of the tract requiring landsceptng and irrigation rob, installed including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and individual front yard landscaping. (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) ee Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision, however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Department approvel. Building separation between all buildings excluding & 1 foot fireplace encroachment, shall not be less than ten (10) feet. g. All street side yard setbacks shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet. All front yards shall be provided with landscaping and automatic irrigation. Bui'lding elevations shall be in substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit B (Colored Elevations). (Amended per Minor change No. 2) VESTING TENTATIVE TRAc MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AND. NO. 1, CORE. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 11 ~0. 22627 24. Materials used in the construction of all building shall be in substantial conformance with that shown In Exhibit C (Materials Board). (Amended per Minor Change No. 2) Prior to the issuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS, the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior to the final building Inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, a six foot high wall shall be constructed along the south lot lines of lots 95 through 126. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety and the Planning Director. (Amended per Hino? Change No. 2) Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, a six foot high chain link fence shall be constructed along the south boundary of the Santa Gertrudis Creek Flood Channel. The required fence shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety. Wall and fence locations shall conform to attached Exhibit F. Wall and fence materials and design shall conform %o those shown in Exhibit D (Design Manual from originally approved Tract 22527). (~Jnended per Minor Change No. 2) de All landscaping and irrigation shall be Installed in accordance with approved plans prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. If the seasonal conditions do not permit planting, tnterlm landscaping, and erosion control measures shall be utillzed as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Buildtag and Safety. Not withstanding the preceding conditions, wherever an acoustical study is required for noise attenuation purposes, the heights of all required walls shall be determined by the acoustical study where applicable. (Added per Minor Change No. 2) Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision tn accordance wtth the standards of Ordinance No. 461. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. 460. Prior to the final building inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, landscape screening, designed to be opaque up to a mtnim,-, hetght of six feet at maturity, shall be Installed along the south boundary of the Santa Gertrudis Creek adjacent to the chain link fence. VESTING TENTATIVE TFLAc NO.' 22627 MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 25. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. {Added per Minor Change No. 2) LD:lgg $/17/9o TR 22627 - Amend tl - Minor Change #2 F~bruary 6, 1990 Page 2 ® e e 10. 11. 12. 13. Major drainage is involved on tills landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by ~he Road Department. Sierra Moore Drive, Silver Ridge Court, Cross Creek Court, Bogar~ Place and Pauma Valley Road shall be improved within ~he dedicated right of way in accordance with County S~andard No. 104, Section A. (40'/60') The landdivider shall provide Eastern Municipal Water District of ~he final map. utility prior to clearance from the recordation The maximum centerline gradient and the minimum centerline radii shall be in conformance wi~h County S~andard %114 of Ordinance 461. Nicolas Road shall be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and~tch up asphalt concrete paving~ recons~ruction~ or resurfacing of existing Paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance wl~h County Standard No. 100. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sac shall be 35 feet. All driveways shall conform ~o ~he applicable Riverside County S~ndards and shall be shown on the s~eet improvement plans. A minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. When blockwalls are required to be constructed on ~op of slope, a debris re~ention wall shall be constructed at the s~reet right of way line ~o prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Commissioner. The m~-~-- garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from ~he face of curb. Nor~hGeneral Kearny Road shall be l~ovedvl~h 34 feet of asphalt concrete Pavement wi~tn a 45 foot par~ width dedica~edright of way in&ccordance wi~hCounty Standard No. 103, Section A. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with County StAndArd NO. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalks ). TR.22627 - Amend dl - Minor Change Fegruary6, 1990 Page 4 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. The s~reet design and improvement concept of ~his project shall be coordinated wi~h TR 21430, TR 23280 and TR 23428. S~reet lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout ~he subdivision. The County Service Ar~a (CSA) Administrator determines whether ~%ls proposal qualifie~ under an existing assessment district or not. If not, ~he land owner shall file, after receiving tentative approval, for an application wi~h LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a 'Lighting Assessment District" .in accordance wi~h Governmental Code Section 56000. All private and public entrances and/or intersections opposite ~his project shall be coordinated wi~h this project and shown on ~he street improve~enu plans. A striping plan is required for Nicolas Road. The re~oval of ~he existing s~riplng shall be ~he responsibility of applicant. Traffic signing and s~riping shall be done by County forces with all incurred costs borne by the applicant. The crossing over ~he San~a Ger~rudis Cr==k at North General Kearny Road shall be as approved by ~he Road Department and Flood Control. Any landscaping within public road rights of way shall co~ply wi~h Road DeparLment s~andards and require approval by T_he Road Con~issioner and assurance of continuing maintenance ~-ough ~he es~tblishment of a landscape main=enance dis~rict/maintenance agreement or similar mechanism as approved by ~he Road Cos~/ssioner. Landscape plans shall be submitted on s~andard County Plan sheet format (24' x 36'). Landscape plans shall be sub~itted with ~he street improve~ent plans and shall depict ~ such landscaping, irrigation and rela~ed facili~/es as are ~o be placed wl~tn the public r~ad right-of-way. Pursuant to Section 66493 of ~he Subdivision Map Ac~ any subdivision which is par~ of an existing Assessment Dlstr~c~ ~t cc~pIy vi~h ~he z~t~sents of said Section. Road Division Engineer TO: FROM: RE: C unty of Rivers; I~IFEKSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: February 2, 1990 ~-nvironmental Health Services h~s reviewed M/nor Change No. 2, Amended No. I dated January 17, 1990. Our current comments will remain as stated An our letter dated February 5, 1988. SH:tac FEB ? 1~90 RIVEFI61DE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT · RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING Dm~CPT. 4080 Lemon Street ITl'g: l:]~vid Mil~lgren VERBIDE COUNT" ?l.,At'-~"""' - iqlC; Tract Map 2262?: Being a division oF Parcel I through 4 OF Parcel Map ?384 as shown by map on file in Book SO. Pages 20 and 21 of Parcel Maps %n the OFfice of the County Recorder. County of Riverside. State of California. (224 LoSe) Gentlemen: The Department o~ Public Health has revleved Tentative Hap No. 22627 and recosunends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prznts of the plans of the vster systea shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 2OO Feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall Ihov the internal pipe diameter, location of valves ~nd Fire hydrants; pipe Joint specifications, and the size of the main &t the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects vith Dzv. ~, Part l, Chapter ? of the California Health ~nd Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, And General Order He. 10~ of the Public Utilities Conniesion of the St&to of California,when &ppltclblo. The pl~m shall be along ~ & registered engineer ~d water vt~ ~e reAl.ins certtrl'catt~: 'l certify thit the deot~ ~ ~e valor oyster in Tract hp 22627 is iccord~ce with ~e water eyeten e~sion ~l~s of the ~cho ~lSfo~ia Water District ~d that ~e water Bodice.storage ~d digtributf~ system vLAI be adenate to provide water service to ouch tract. certificiti~ does not c~stitute a parctee that vial l~p~y water to ouch tract at ~y qu~tttSes. rAovs or pressures ~or fire protection ~y other purpose'. ~ certification shaAA be by a responsible off,tiaA of the water comply. Pa~e Two Attn: D~vid ~&hlgren .February 5, 1g88 This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Mater District agreeing to serve domestic Mater to each and every Jot in the lubdivision on demand providing litilfactory financial arrLngemints are completed with the subdivider. It vii/ be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the f~nal map. This Department has a statement from the. Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to alloy the subdivision sewage system to be cor,~ected to the severs of the District. The sewer system shall be ~nlt&LZed according to pll~l and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sever system shall be submitted in triplicate. along with the original driving, to the Co~mty Surveyor. The prints shall they the internal pipe diameter, location of BanhoLes. complete profiles. pipe and joint specifications and the size of the severs at the ~u~ction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating Location of sever lines ~Ad water lines IhaAl be i port,on of the levage piano registered engineer ~d the lever d~itrict with the foA3oving certification: 'I certify that the design of the lever lyitem ~n Tract MAp ~2627 ts tn accord~ce v~th the sewer lyitem e~ll~ pl~l of the hi'tern M~tcipal Water D~itrtct ~d that the ~lte dtipolaA System'is adequate at ~il time to treat the ~ttcipated waltes from the proposed. tract.' Attn David W&hlgren Page Three February S, 1988 ~ade prior to the recordation of the f~nal map. It will be necessary for the &ru~exa~'i0n proceedings' to.be completely finalized prior to the recordation of the final Environmental Health Servzces SM:tac ~INNL~T)4 1-- [DW&R~ TB~.RI)NONI: (71d) 7l?.1018 RIV'E:RSID£ COUNTY F1.OOD CONTROL ANt:) WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IIY&'IIIIDL GA.I. Jl~41NI& IIIO1 Riverside County P1 anntng I)eparta~nt County Administrative Center Riverside, Cal tfornil Attention: Regtonil Tea No. / Re: V~-s~/;.,,../e 7'r,,c, Area: lie hive reviewed thts clse Ind hive the following cmmmnts: Except for nutsince nature locil runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project ts considered free from ordtnar~ storm flood hazard. However, · storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should com~l~ wtth Ill ippltcible ordinances.. · The topogrlphy of the Irea conststs of yell defined ridges Ind natural rarer- courses which 'traverse the property. There is Idequate area outside of the naturil wirercourses for building sites. The naturil watercourses should be kept free of buildings ind obstructions in order to mtntatn the natural drltnage pitterns of the irea Ind to prevent flood dmmmge to new buildings. A note should be placed on in environmental constraint sheet stating, "All new buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of 18 inches ·bove adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home'supports." This ~roJect is in the Area dratnage plan fees shall be paid in accordance with the ipplicable r~les and regulations. The proposed zoning ts consistent with extsttng flood hlzards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing mY be required to full~ develop to the tmplleddenstt . The Dtstrlct'sreportdated M4~. ~, /art is stt11 current for this project; does not object to the preposodmtnorchlnge. The attached c~anents oply. e truly VESTING TENTATIVE TRAc MINOR CHANGE NO. 2 AMD. NO. 1, CORR. NO. 1 Conditions of Approval Page 12 NO.' 22627 25, Prior to the issuance of a grading permlt, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habttat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. (Added per Hinor Change No. 2) LD:lg9 5/17/90 E OF ROAD COMMISSIONER & COUI .;URVEYOR February 6, 1990 Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 Ladies and Gentlemen= KO. BOX TR 22627 -Amend %1 Minor Change #2 ScheduleA - Team i - SMD %9 AP #111-111-111-9 With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced ~en~ative land division map, ~he Road DeparUnent - recommends ~hat the landdivider provide ~he following street improvements, s~reet improvenent plans and/or road dedications in accordance wi~h Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement S~M~-ds (Ordinance 461). It is understood ~hat the ten~a~ive map correctly shows &ccep~ble centerline elevations, all existing easements, ~raveled ways, and drainage courses wi~h appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptebilitymay require the map to be resuhnitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential par~s and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as ~hough occurring in all. The~ are intended ~o be complementary and ~o describe ~he conditions for a complete design of ~he improvement. All questions regarding~he ~.~uemeaning of ~he conditions shall be referred to ~he Road Commissioner's Office. The landd/vider shall protect downstream proper~ies from damages caused by al~eration of the drainage patterns, i.e., concen~ration of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities ~ncluding enlarging existing facilities and/ or by securing a draJ.nage e~es~nt, All drainage easements shall be shown on ~he final map and no~ed as follows z "Drainage Easement - no building, obstruc~ons, or or~roa~hmen~s by land fills are allowed'. The project,on shall be as &m~ved by the Road Department. The landd~vider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or ~hrough the site. ~n =he event ~e Road C~u~lssioner permits'the use of s~=ee~ for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article XI of Ord/nance No. 460 will apply. Should ~he quantities exceed the s~reet capaciLT or ~he use of s~reets be prohibited for drainage purposes, ~ subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by ~he Road COU?q'TY ADKI]qlS'TRAT!¥Z 4:E~rER * 4080 LEMON STR~ * ~F., CALHORIqlA 92501 P.O. BOX soma RIVrRsIDI:' COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL. AND V~ATS:'IR CONS£RVATION DISTRICT Ilrv11~l~ C,eJ.IPORN'AII. BOI Hatch 9, 1988 liverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center liverside,' California &trention: Regional Team David Vahlgren Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Yesting Tract 22627 This is.a proposal to divide about 56 acres in the Santa Oertrudis Valley area. The s~te is between N~colas Road and North General Kearny Road and along the north side of Santa Oertrudis Creek. Our review indicates that almost the entire property Ls located within the 3ants Gertrudis Creek 100 year Flood plain as del~n- mated on the Flood Insurance Rate gap published by the Federal Emergency Hansdement Agency (F£NA). The developer proposes to construct a flood control channel along the site's south boundary to convey the flows from Santa Gertrudls Creek and drain all the ohsitc and offsite storm runoff into this channel through street or storm drain systems. Local offsite storm flows are tributary to the east property boundary, no indication is shown how the flows would be handled. Following are the Dlstr~ct's recommendations: This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrud~s Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainase fees have been adopted by the ~oard. Drainage fees shall be paid as act forth under the provia~ons of the gRulea and'Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plansu, amended July 3, 198q: Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner aa part of the filing for record of the subdivision final alp or parcel BBp, or Lf the recordins of a final parcel nap is waived, drainage fees shall be paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording ~ oertifiolte of compliance evidentinK the waiver of the parcel la~a or At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting defermeat of the payment of fees, the drainage fees shall be paid to the Building Director at the time of issuance of a Arad- tag permit or building permit for each approved par- eel, whichever Buy be f~rst obtained after the recording of the subdiv~alon final map or parcel map; 'however, liveraide County Planning Department Re: Yesting Tract 22627 ~arch 9, 19~ Drainage Fees shall be paid to the Road Conniss~oner as 8 part of the filial for record of the subdivision flsa! asp or parcel map, or before receiving a va~ver to record a land division, for each lot within the land division where construction activity as ev~- denned by one of the following actions has occurred Ctnce Hay 26, 1981: (a) A grading ~ermit or building permit has been obtained. (b) Grading or structures have been initiated. The pro~osed channel should be constructed to the District~s standards. The design of the proposed flood control channel should utilize.the following assumptions: a. Design discharge = 7800 els b. Freeboard ~ 2 feet Effects of transitions, curves and bridge p~e~s should be Included in the hydraulic analys~$. The following should,be included in the design: m. The channel should be soft battoned. Invert should be maintained at natural grade to pre- vent headward eros/on or downstream siltat/on. Side banks should be hardened with concrete or 'rlprap, which should extend from the top of bank to a depth below floe l~ne based on design velocities. Io levees will be permitted. All building sites ad- Jacent to the channel should be constructed above the IdJaoent top of channel. loseas roads should be provided along each aide of the channel. Offsite training dikes may be necessary to guide . Flows toward the channeltzed section. Offslie ease meats should be secured from the a~feeted property owners. Alternatively, facilities should be spelled backe artsite. Riverside County -3- ~arch 9, 198B 0 Prior to initiation of the final construction drawings for those facilities required to be built ss part of the Hurtlets Creek/Santa Gertrud~s Valley Area Drainage Plan, the developer should contact the Riverside County Flood Control and Mater Conservation D~str~ct to ascertain the terns and oond~tions of design, construction, ~nspection, transfer of rlshts of way, project credit in l~eu of Fees end reimbursement schedules which may apply. Title re- ports end title insurance must be provided For all rSght .of way to be transferred to the Distr$ct. The developer should note that $F the esSlusted cost for required area draSnage plan fac$1$tSes exceeds the requSred draSnage fees and the developer w~shea to receSve credit For reSm- bursement in excess of his Fees, the fac$1$ties w$11 be constructed as a public works contract. $chedulSng FOr construction of these facilities will be at the discre- t~on of the District. Permission should be secured from the upstream property owner If any increase ~n wa~er depths steerer than 6 inches is proposed and from the downstream property owner for the concentration of Flows. Cop~es of these docu- ments should be submitted to the Dlstr~ct For revie~ pr~or to rues?darVon of the f~nal map. All lots abutting the proposed flood control channel should be elevated above 100 year flood water surface. 6. Offsite storm Flows tributar~ to the property form the east should be collected and safely conveyed through the propert~ to Santa Gertrudis Creek. ?, Oneitc drainase facilities located ogtside of road risht of ¥sF should be contained within drsinase easements shown on the f~nsl lap. · note should be added to the final map atstinS, eDrainase easements shall be kept free of buildLaSs and obstructionga, o Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainsse easements obtained From the affected ~ropert~ owner(s). The docuuent(s) should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation o~ the final map. All lots should be Srsded to dra~n to the adjacent street or on adequate outlet. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract R2627 10. The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the ourb nnd the 100 year storm flow should be assrained wSthin the street r$sht of way. ~hen either of these erStaria Ks exceeded, addit~onal draLnage facilities should be installed. 11. Drainage facilities outletting aunp oondlt$ons should be designed to convey the tributary 100 7ear storm flows. &dditional emergency escape should also be provided. 12. 13. I drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property o~ners for the release of concentrated or vetted storm flows. & copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for rev~e~ pr~or to the recordation of the final map. ! Evidence of a viable maintenance mechanism should be sub- n~tted to the D~strict and County for review and app~ova pr~or to recordation of the f~nal map. 15. ?empacsty erosion control measures should be Lnplemented Lmmediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainass fac$lities. A copy of the improvement plans, ~radin& plans and f~na! map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic culations should be.submitted to the Distr~ct via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recor~a- tiaa of.the fLnal map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of srading pernits. Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert ChLang of thLs offLee at 71~/787o2333. Very truly yours, Rancho Pacific En~lneer~n~ EENNETH L. EDV&RD$ ,,:-,/_ -.// ~enior Civil Engineer Re:bah RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WFrH THE CAUFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY GLEN J. N~ ~ C~U~ 1-31-90 ATTN: RE: PLANNING DEPARTMENT LAURIE DOBSON TR 22627 - HINOR CHANGE ~2 - AHENDED ~1 Planning & Engineerir~ Office 4080 Lemon Street, Suite 11 IUvertide, CA 9250 l (714) 787-6606 With respect to the conditions of approval for-the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recomends the following fire protection measures be provided in accordance with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection standards: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule "A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2t") located one at each street intersection and spaced no more than 330 feet apart in any direction, with no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow shall be 1000 GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the following certification: #I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department. # The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. N/TIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the ~iverside County Fi~e Department, · cash s~m of $400.00 per lot/unit as m/tigation for fire l=OteCt~on impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he/she ~ay enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the t/me of is~mnce of a building l~t. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner Laura Cabral, Fire Safety Specialist · ....~ ~_~-~-' Ooumy Aclmini~trative Center * 4080 lemon Street. 2ncl Floor ~'~ ~ ~-~-~ Riverside. Celifomia 92501-3661 July RSverside County Plann£ng Department Attention~ David #ahlgren County &dministrat~ve Center R~vers£de, CA 92501 Vesting Tract 22627. ~end e2 Lad~es and Gentlement The Land Use D~v£s~on of the Department of BuildSrig and Safety has the foiloven9 con~nents and condSt$ons: Pr$or to the issuance of building permits° the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-s~te and off- s~te s~gnage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section-19.6 of Ordinance.348. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required m~n~mum $' sade yard setback. Hechan~cal equipment may not be located An requ£red minKmum side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H. Zngrm~, Director DEPARTHENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Bullding Impec~ion (714) 1'~7-E480 · A~lmini~tation (714) 7B?.~020 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT GRADING SECTION FF7 0 1 TO: FRON: DATE: RE: APN PLANNING ! LAURIE DOBSON SAM D. GONZALEZ January 29, 1990 VTR 22627 - MC #2 919-350-022, 025 The "Grading Section" has reviewed a conceptual grading plan for this site. The plan is acceptable. Consequently, the "Grading Section" recommends approval of this project if the following conditions are included. Prior to commencing any grading in excess of 50 cubic yards, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. All grading shall conform to Chapter 70 of the Uniform Building Code as amended by Orcdinance 457. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the property owner shall obtain a grading permit and approval to construct from the Building and Safety Department. Plant and irrigate fill slopes greater ~han or equal to 3''and/or cut slopes greater [han or eaual to 5' in vertical height wi=h grass or ground cover. Slopes ~ha~ exceed 15' in vertical height are to be provided wi%h shrubs and/or Irees per coun% ordinance 457, see form 284- 47. Landscape plans are ~o be signed by a registered landscape architect and bonded per the requirements of Ordinance 457, see form 284-47. Grading in excess of lgg cubic yards wfll rlauire Derfomaance security to be posted wi~h ~he Butlding and Safety department. The proposed retaining walls, shown on the conceptual grading plan, will require separate.permits and shall be designed by a registered civt1 engineer - unless they conform to the County $~andard Re[dining Wall designs shown on Building and Safety Department forms 284-197. NOTE: For the f~nal grading plan, please'provide the applicable information form Building and Safety Department grading forms: 284-120, 284-21, 284-86, ~nd 284-46. Thank you. 4 lancho CIl(f. Water Southern ~ltf. £clts~ Southern ~1 (f. &is General Telephone ~£STIK TRACT 22627/Di~G£ OF ' ~pt. of Transpolar(on f8 (T~J) . E-i . ZON[ S . T~cull ~on .... 3236] . ]19 [1St~ ~. ~ngfneertno . ~,r.,_..~nchO P4Ctftc ~'~ I R-S ~ - .~.. ~ R.~,R.3,R.S Your ~nts and ~c~n~t't~ I~ ~es IMTE: 2/2/88 SIG~TUPZ Io'~/~M)'~4~ ' ' PL~ Print ham and tftle z~. ber(~. 'lrur. ato/A~·:i~tm~t Z)/recto~/palm~ 40~0 LEId~JN gYllgl~T ~ Irl l"JrjQ CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ThLe ~aoe is within 30 ullee of the Palomar Observatory and in therefore within the sous requiting the use of la~-preeoure Bedlam vapor street 1ilhtt~S, u stipulated b! ~he livers/de Gaunt! Board of Supervisors. Me request that the design for other types of outdoor lighting that Bay be enploTed un this property be made consistent vith the spirit of the decraise Of the Board of Su~et'visors vhich Is intended to mitigate the adverse effects such facilities have on ~he astronomical research at Palomar. kueficial steps to that end include: 1. Use the minimum ano~nt of llKht needed for the task. 2. Orient and shield llsht to prevent direct ulNard illumination. Turn off lights at 11:00 p.m. (or earlier) unless, in counercia! applications. the associated business is eneu pest that time, in v~ic~ case the liShts should be turned off a~ elssinS. Use 2a~-pressure sodium lmrps for roed~ays, valkva7s, equipment 7erda, parking lo~s, sacuric7 and other similar applications. These used not be turned off For further tnforuatiem, call (818) 356-A035. Rober~ J. Brucato ddsis~anz D~rector" RiVE:DiDE COUil .u PLArlnilIG Dr:PARklTIr:rlk I~TE: Jinul~ 22, 1988 Bufldf~g end Safety : .- J' Su~ve.vor - bye bid Deplrtmnt NHlth FIrt Protection Flood Control I)tst~lct Ffsh I Game LAFC0, S U.S. Postal h~vlce- Ruth £. bvSd$on Jtancho CIltf. Miter Southern ralt f. ~u~e~ ~tf. Gs VESTZ~ ~ ~2627/~G[ 0F bneral Teleph~e (T~I) - E.A. 32361 - ~ncho P~ctflc ~pt. of Trins~t~ fB Eng~fi~rt~ - ~rrtetl At, -Ftrst T~cull ~ton ~fsortll Otstrt~ - ~rth i ~uth of Els~ ~ton ~ar~. ~st of Via' Lo~ - Hr. Pal~ ~ne - S3 Ic~ ~n~ t-2 & R-S) - ~ 119 - 919-3S~022-024,02S Please ~evlev the case descrJbed above,* along vtth the ittJched cise top. A Lind D~vts~on Corottree metSng his been tenuttvely scheduled for I~rCh I0, 1988. If clears, It v111 then go to puhllc heirSrig. Your com.~ents and recomendattons are reouested I~1or Ketch 3, 1988 to fn order that m~y fnclu~e thin Jn the staff repo~t for thts- pe~tfcular case. Should you have ins questions regisling thls 1tin. please do not histtire to contact hvtd Igihlo~en it 787-1363 ~lanner The Elsinore Onfee Ifigh School Dtstrlct facilities are eeercrmded eros our educational program serfoesly f~picted by fncrHsfq studnet impulatlee caused kY m ~sfdeRl&1, cemaitc1&1 ired t~d~ustrt&l ConStructlee. Tkerefo~, pursuant · o California Gayorient Code Section S3080 of AB 2626 aM S~ 327. thts dlstrtct Je~rl~s. 11 fee qal~t o.1.1...mu developmet IWOJects Mtlda Its boosalaries. ~ print n~m and title LEMON ~rREET, ~ FLOOR I:UVEII~DE, CALIFORNIA ~2501 46,200 C)~IS STnEET. ROOk4 304 INDIa, C&LIFORNIA 82201 Hr. Richard NacHotto auperv~stng Planner Riverside County Planning Departneat 4080 Leaon Street, 9th Floor a~verside, CA 02SOI The following susmarlzes our f~ndlngs regarding the f~scal ~mpact ~n&l¥sls for the pro~ect ~denttf~ed 8bore. The appendLx attached aumuarlzes the basic assumptions used ~n the analysis. Please note that these results reflect the current leve2s of service provided by the County based on Fiscal Year 1986 - 2987 actual costs (per capita factors) an~ gepartBenttl mad Auditor-Controller review of and fa:t22ty costs for services raYLaved using case study analysis. Staff to the Growth Fiscal Impact Task Force and Departments are current2y reviewing service leve!sprovLded and the neea to 2ncrease the levels of service. Curren~ findings are thit existLag leve2s of service are not adequate in Boat cases. Should the deaLred level o! se.~vlce be u~222zed ~ the fiscal analysis perfo~ed, sl~lflcan~ly increase the costs associated deve2opnent. COUl~ Ftr~ (Operations ~nd NaXntenonce) F~S~L ~HPA~ AFTER BUILDOUT CUMUT, ATIVE FISCAL L~iPACTAT BUILDOUT Count20enerel Fire free LLbrez~ ($?,?S~) ($3,~0~) ($63) (821,521) Road fund (84,829) ($16,350) 814,096 (S~,436) ($22~) $6,S33' ($~,222) The followlng special circumstances apply to thls pro~ec~: 1. The developer assumptions ~ncluded a factor of 28.75% of AncoBe used for taxable sales. CA0 staff utilized a factor of 22.$%, whAch Ks closer to the countywAde average. 2. Please note the attached letter, dated June 29, 1988, fFOB the R~versAde ¢Aty and County PublAc LZbrary concernAng thLs project. 3. Flood Control staff has ~ndAceted that flood control £ac~l~tAes constructed wlth~n Zone 7 are unlAkely to be sufficiently funded for maintenance costs. Current estimates :Lnd~cate that funding shortages should occur for the next ten years. Suggested B~t~gatAon measures ~nclude a cash deposAt by the project developer or use of an assessment mechanism. The amount of deposit would be determined by a present value analys~s and pro~ect t~n~ng. The cost of Ba~ntaAnAng flood conetel fac~lAt~s not be knob-n untA1 fAnal design phases, when fac~lAty have been fully ~dentAfLed. Flood Control staff therefore, conl~t~on project approvals to Adent~fy a of f~nancAng fsc~lAty maAntenance and operat2on necessary) prlo~ to re:orda~lon of subd~vAslons. wall needs ~ea~s Based on the analysAs an~ assuming that the everage sales prate of ~he units w~ll be ~1440165, overall Vest~n~ Tentative Tract 2262? w~ll have a negative rascal ~pact a= buAldout of ~3,122. After buildcut, t~As project, w~11 hav~ an annual negative f~scal Ampact to the ccunty of $16,350 at current ~evels o! service. Initial Review .By:.. / Review Approved By: ~,~/--~ ~~b~ ° Eive ide c Libra Mr. Kevin lughas RANPAC 27447 Enterprise Circle Most Teuecul&, CA 02300 SOBJECTI V~STXNG TENTATIVE TRACT 22627-RAHCHO CALIFOI~NZA (2HD I~EWJXO# per Mr. Bughas) 3 am writing in response to your request for tn£or~ation re- girdlag the Infect o~ a proposed project upon library service. The proposed project would adversely affect existing library eelvices. The increase In population to be ocrwed would require an increase In funding to the County Library to maintain the current level o£ service. However, the current level of service has been recognized as substantially inadequate. The attached charts ihov how the urrent nuabe. r of voluses per capita and the current square eet per capita are inadequate and have declined during the last decade due to the lapact of rapid population growth throughout the County. be attached ~harta (Appendix C and The fiscal impact of au additional 600 persons (223 dwelling unite) la orated below ~n 1088 dollira in amounts needed to  )maintaLn the current, inadequate level of service only end to )provide the desired level of service. The desired level is Inclusive of the eurren~ level. Level of Service facilities (one tLBe ooet ~ly) 'C~lloCt i~' (volumes) (one tiao ~ ~3,774 " '~ 27,406 $ S,SOO · "" Subtotal for facilities 'and Collection " '(one tinoe~dtonly) (annual ongoing ooIt) Provide Desired Level of Service $ 10,678" 62,~78 " 11,340 13]e &saessuent of & library facilities and collections fee tie1 uit ~p~v~do ~e ~o~d level of oe~oe. The deterulnitlon that the_ proJ®ct*a eetluated oeeeooe~ doll&rs to the County Library District to finance ongoing expenses ot the current levo~ o! oaFvice, or S11e340 per 3~aC. to fLnance angeLrig expenses at the deaLred love2 o~ feel free to sentact me at (?14)782-S213, 1£ you have £urther questions. Auth gncloeuFeet AppendLx C end D act Linda Wood, Libraz~ D~FoctoF 'mont.¢aouette, Senior Administrative Analyst iLTVEASSDI: ~ITZ &lid C:OOwTr' I~BLIC &IBIULtr VOLUNI::S pr~ C,A,Y~A ,-0 Cf.~.r~ )RAleCll L~BP~R:rI:S ~112 · 32S,074 3 II S 4l~, ISO .40~, lO0 ~mr 1,14 .g2 e o ·e · Based on IKCCI,J, AMul bpKtJ RiVER iD; COUIICY fi. nnln DE? RQ IEIlC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (E.A.) NUMBER: NAME OF PERSON(s)PREPARING E.A.:~"~[~--'~ [[~'i}',,~"~lt'~C~ PflOJECT I! IFORMATION STANDARD EVALUATION MODULE NUMBER(s): ~c~ A. DESCRIPTION (k~ude proposed minimum lot size and uses ~ applicable):'-~'-'c~ ~ V'v, ~-y~\o j B. TOTAL PROJECT AREA: ACRES ~-"~-~% ; or SQUARE FEET C. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.(s): (~\c~ _ ,~'~O - ~'~ '~ ) O'~L-!~ ,~O~-'S' O. EXISTING ZONING: ~---~- E PROPOSED ZQNING: F. STREET REFERENCES: IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? IS THE PROPOSAL IN CONFORMANCE? "~./'~ G. SECTION, TOWNSHIP, RANGE DESCRIPTION OR ATTACH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I~ BRIEF DE~..~IIFTION OF ~HE EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SlOE AND .S SURROUNDINGS: IL COMPREHEr.~'~IVE GENERAL PLAN OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION DESIGNATIOH Check the appror"i,~te option(s) below and proceed accordingly. r"l All or part of the project ~lte i~ in "Adopted Sl:)ecific Plans," "REMAP" or "Rancho Viileges Community Policy Areas". Complete Section/ III, N (B and C only), V and Vl. ~ All or parl of fhs project site i~ in "Areas Not Designated 18 Open Space". Complete Sections Ill. IV (A, B and D c~dy), V rand VL ]'] All or p~rt of th,, project slte'hl~ an Open Space and Conservation de$ignstion other th~n those mentioned Bbove. Comp!,,te Sectiorm RI, N (A, B, and E only), V and VI. ~111. ENVIRONMENT/M. HAZARDS AND RESOURCES A~SESSMENT the nature o~the Prol~ ~ uas as cleten~ined from ~ ~p~ as ~d ~ ~ ~I ~ Figure (~ ~). ~ ~~ 18 ~ ~ ~..,~ ~ ~M ~ ~ ~HiW ~s ~ ~ III.B. ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ ~1-~ Risk ~. NI mf~ ~u~ ~e ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ts ~ ~u ~ ~ ~, ~inp ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ ~m~ ~ ~ V. Nm, ~e ~di~t~, HAZARDS .F4Jl~,Jrd Zones (Fig. ~.1 ) ~ ~ U R (Fig. ~.3) 2~ ~~ ~ten~ ~ (~g. ~.1) 13.~ ~ S ~ U R (F~. ;.4) 3-~ Gr~nd~i~ Z~ (Fig ~.1) 14.~ ~ S PS U R (F~. ~.5) ~ ~iv. ~. 8~ ~ ~ M~S) ~dsli~ R~k ~ (Riv. ~. ~ ~le ~mic M~8 ~ On-8~e I~~) ~ ~ PS U R R~f~11 ~d (On-s~e Ins~) ~se~ti~ ~wt~ ~il ~) E~i~ (U.S.DA. ~tl ~wati~ ~ ~1 ~we~) ~ ;~si~ & Blow~d (Fig. ~.1, ~. ~, ~. 14.2 & ~. ~) ~ Inunda~m ~ (F~. ~.7)~ ~ ~pl~n8 (~. ~.7) U R (Fig. ~.8) (Fig. Vl.6) Airport No~e (Fig. 11.18.5, 11.18.11 & V1.12 & 1~84 AiCUZ Report, M.A.F.B.) IdA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) Railroad Noise (Fig. ViA 3 - Vl 16) ~ A B C P (Fig, VI.11 ) Highway Noise (Fig. VIA ? - Vl.29) NA A B C D (Fig, VI.11 ) 15." Other Noise NA A B C D (Fig, VIA 1 ) 16. ~ Project Generated Noise Affecting 20. 21. '2~" Noise Sensitive Uses (Fig. Vl. 11 ) Noise ~ef~altive Project (Fig. VIA 1 ) Air Qualib/Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Air Quality Watar Quality Impacts From Project Project Sensitive to Watar Quality 22. ~ Hazardous Materials and Wastes 23..E~._ Hazardous Fire Area (Fig. V1.30 - Vl.31) 24. -' Other 25. Other RESOURCES In o~ ! lear an Agrtcuitural Pm~rv~ (Riv. ¢30. Agricultural LAnd ConveraaUon Cont.,.=t Main) 35 28_~ Wild,if, (Fig. Vl.36 - Vl.37) Veg,,t,tSon (Fig. V1.38 - VI.40) Mir~Fd Re~urcee (Fig. VIA1 * Vt.42) 31 Ene~'~ Re~xJr~ee (Fig. V1.43 - V1.44) 37." ~::enic Highways (Fig. VI.45) Historic Resources (F,g. Vl.32 - Vl.33) Archaeological Resources (Fig. Vl.32 - VI.33 & Vl.46 - Vl.48) Paleontological Resources (Paleof~toiogical Resources Map) C)l~r Definitions for Land Use Suitability and Noise Acceptability Ratings NA - No( Applictblo $ - Generally Suitable PS - Provisionally Suitable U - C-d!~erall¥ Unlultlble R - ReltTtcted A - Generally Acceptable B - Conditionally Accep~le C - Generally Unacceptable D - Land Uf, e Discouraged LAND USE IP~'TERMINATION 5. ~NiIY PLAN, IF ANY: -- 6. COMMUI~IY PLAN DESIGNATION(s), IF ANY: -" For all projects, inidcate with s yes (Y) or no (N) whether any public facilities and/or sewices issues may significantly affect or be affected by the proposal. All referenced figures are contained in the Comprehensive General Plan. For any issue marked yes (Y), write data sources, agencies consulted, findings of fact, and mitigation measures under Section V. PUBUC FAClUTIES AND SERVICES Circulation (Fig. IV.l-IV.11. D'_m'm_,ss in Sec. V Existing, F'tanned & Required Roads) Bike Trails (Fig. IV. 12 - N. 13) Water (^gency Letters) Sewe~ (^gerry Letters) Fire ,~, _v~__ (Fig IV. 16 - N.16) ~ ~ervtces (Fig IV.17 - N.18) Scho~ (Fig. N.I?. IV. 18) Solid W~,~ta (Fig. IV.l?. N.18) Parks ~d Recreation (Fig. NAg - N.20) Equestrian Trails (Fig. IV. 19 - IV.24/ Riv. Co. 800 Scale Equestrian Trail Maps) Utilities (Fig. IV25- IV.26) Libraries (Fig. IV. 17 - IV. 18) Health .~ervices (Fig. IV.17 - IV. 18) Airports (Fig. 11.18.2 - 11.18.4, 11.18.8- 11.18.10 & IV.27 - IV.36) Disaster Preparedness City Sphere of Irl~uerx:e ff pll or I:)eJl cdr ff~, project is Iooate~ in "Adopted ,~::ifm Plans', "FIEMAP" or "Rancho Villages Cc~nmunily Policy Areas", review k~ detail U~e specific pol'~.,ies applying to Ihe proposal, and complete ~ following: 1. Slate Ihe re~..,~anl land use designation(s): 2. Based on IhH ~itial study, is the proposal consistent with the policies and designations of the appropriate documenL and Iherefcxe co~siste~t with the Comprehensive General Plan? ff not, explain: II I, AND USE I~ETERMINA110N quesUons 1, 2, 3, 6 Ind 7. Cornldete ~~ 4, 5, 6 ~ 7 I/It is in = Community Plan. land um type 3. I D.1 dillres from D.2, will Ihe difference be resolved it Ihe develop,,,ent It~ge? Explain: 4. Community PLan designation(s): Is the profx:)~-~l project oonsi~tent wilh the policies Ind designations of Ihe Community Plan? If noL explain: ~. Is the proposal compatible with existing and proposed surrounding land uses? If not. explain: X~O Based oft th;s inRJel study, Is the proposal co~sistent with the Comprehensive General Plan? If no(, mfe~nnce by Section ~nd Issue Number those issues identifying inco~istencies: _~/~ E. II el or i~d o~ ~e prc)jecl ~ kl in in Open Space and Conservation designation, complete the fol~c~ing: 1. State Ihe 2. II Ihe ~ consisterst with Ihe designation(i)? ff not, explain: 3. Based on tf~ irdlial study, Is Ihe proposal co~81sent with Itm C~mpmheniive General Plan? ff no(, refefPtce by Section end Issue Number IhoM issues ide~tifying inconsistencies: V. INFORli~II,TION BOURCE$, FINDINGS OF FACT AND MITIGATION MF.A~URES A. ADDmONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED BEFORE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CAN BE COMPLETED: B. For each issue m,~rked y~$ (Y) under Sections III.B and IV.B, identify the Section and Issue number and do the following, in the. fewnat as shown below: 1. List aJl additional relevant data sources, Including agencies consulted. 2. Stata all findings of fact regarding environmental concema. 3. State specific mitigation measures, If identIfiable without requiring an environmental impact reporl (E.I.R.) 4. If additionel information is required before the environmental assessment can be completed, refer to Subsection/~ 5. If additional ~heets are needed to complete this ~--tion, check the box at the end of the section and attach the necessary sheets. SECTION/ ISSUE NO. ¥. INFORMATION BOURCES, FINDING8 OF FACT AND MITIGATION MEABURE8 (~ontlnued) SECTION/ ISSUE NO. SOURCES, AGENCIES CONSULTED, FINDINGS OF FACT, MITIGATION MEASURES: See attached pages. VL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DETERMINATION: ~ The proJecl will not have · atgnificant effect on the environment and · Negative Declaration may be D The project could have · algnlficant effect on the environment; however, there will not be a significant effect In Ibis case because the mitigation mea~ure~ delcribed In Section V have been applied to the project and a Negative Declaration may be prepared. [] The project may have · algnlficant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report Prepared by ITEM NO. 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICEK---- CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Engineering Department ~ March 18, 1991 Adoption of Proposed Street Name - "Overland Drive" PREPARED BY: Albert Crisp RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt "Overland Drive" as the Official name of that future street from Jefferson Avenue to Ynez Road which alignment approximates the northeasterly prolongation of Overland Drive from its intersection with Jefferson Avenue, DISCUSSION: The City Council has expressed concern with the use of the unofficial name, "Apricot Street". for the proposed street and overcrossing of the 1-15 Freeway between Jefferson Avenue and Ynez Road, The City Council desires that this proposed street and overcrossing of the freeway be designated as "Overland Drive" and that this become a matter of public record. Construction of the proposed "Overland Drive" roadway and overcrossing is planned as part of Phase II of the Community Facilities District 88-12 (Ynez Corridor). FISCAL IMPACT: None. AC:mb Attachments: 1. Location Map Staffrpt\Adopt.OD\mb 1 /' \~\ ITEM NO. 10 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJEC~ CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Clerk March 26, 1991 Entitlement of Lake Elsinore to the City of Lake Elsinore RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECUIA SUPPORTING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO ACQUIRE AND EXERCISE JURISDICTION OF THE LAKE BACKGROUND: Mayor Parks requested that this matter be placed on the agenda with along with the resolution which we have prepared for your consideration. The letter of request from the Mayor of the City of Lake Elsinore, Gary Washburn is also attached. jsg Attachments: Resolution Letter from Gary M. Washburn dated March 7, 1991 MA~ lB 'gl 16:31 PACIFIC SOILS S.D.61g-560-0380 CITY HALl. 130 SOUTH MAIN STREET LAKE ELSINORE, CALl FORNIA 92330 Telel~hone (714) 674-3125 Hatch 7, 1991 The 'Honorable Mayor Ronald Parks .City of Temecul,a P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 'RE: Entitlement of Lake Elsinore to the City of Lake Elsinore Omar Mayor Parks: I'am writing this letter to seek support of you and your City in reference to the above. As you are aware, the Lake is a natural resource that lies within the City's limits. It not only enhances our local economy but that of the City.of Temecula also. To have the lake under the control of our City management.would be of benefit to both city and county residents. We are requesting that the State of California and its Parks and Recreation Dmpa,tment assign the City of Lake Elsinore the ownership of the lake and its recreational areas. .Your support of this matter would be appreciated. If you have any questions or would like further information, please don't hesitate to contact my office at 674-3124, ext. 261. Sincerely, ,/',TY OF CAKE ELSINORE Gl~l:ld cc: City Council City .Manager .: Asststant'CityManager RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLU'rION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA SUPPORTING THE DESIRE OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE TO ACQUIRE AND EXERCISE JURISDICTION OF THE LAKE WHEREAS, at the present time Lake Elsinore is operated under the jurisdiction of the California State Parks and Recreation Department, and WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore is within the corporate boundaries and sphere of influence of the City of Lake Elsinore; and WHEREAS, Lake Elsinore is central to both the propose and welfare of the community providing both significant recreation opportunities and economic support to the area through tourist related aspects; and WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elsinore and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Lake Elsinore are the most appropriate agencies for owning and operating Lake Elsinore as a consequence of the breadth of both civic and economic powers; and WHEREAS, it is clearly in the best interest of the community to have a local agency responsive to local citizenry responsible for operating the lake. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Temecula, do hereby support and encourage the City of Lake Elsinore to acquire and exercise jurisdiction of the Lake and do further encourage the State of California and its agencies, State Parks and Recreation Department to enter into discussions with the City of Lake Elsinore concerning the potential acquisition of Lake Elsinore. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 5/r*ao152 -I- STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 90- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the ~day of , 1991, by the following roll call vote. AYES: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemarts, Mufioz, Moore, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCILMEMBER: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBER: None 51r~ao152 -2- ITEM NO. 11 ORDINANCE NO. 91-08 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTIVATING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA AND DECLARING AND DESIGNATING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA. Pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33100, there exists in the City of Temecula a separate public body, corporate politic, known as the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula is hereby activated and is authorized to function within the City and transact business and exercise all powers which may be performed or exercised by a redevelopment agency under the provisions of the Constitution of the State of California and Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et sea_., "Community Redevelopment Law"). SECTION 2. DESIGNATION OF CITY COUNCIL AS THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. The City Council shall be the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula and all of the rights, powers, duties, privileges, and immunities vested in a redevelopment agency under the Community Redevelopment Law shall be vested in the City Council. SECTION 3. FINDINGS. A. Policies and Goals. It is the desire and intent of the City Council to promote sound growth, development and redevelopment of the City of Temecula through: (1) Correction and/or elimination of substandard, insanitary, blighted, and deteriorating buildings, structures and conditions within the City; and (2) The clearance, reconstruction, rehabilitation restoration, conservation, with proper planning of those areas of the City where such activity is necessary or desirable; and (3) Encouraging and undertaking public and private improvement programs beneficial to the City and its residence. 2\ORDS\91-08 I B. Specific Findings. (1) In order to achieve the policies and goals described in this Section, it is necessary and the public interest, convenience and necessity require the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula to be activated and to function within the City of Temecula. (2) Declaring the Council to be the Redevelopment Agency of Temecula will serve the public interest and promote the public safety and welfare of the City of Temecula in an effective manner. SECTION 4. DESIGNATION OF OFFICIALS. The City Manager of the City shall serve as the Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency. The City Clerk of the City shall serve as the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency. The City Attorney of the City shall serve as the General Counsel of the Redevelopment Agency. Such officials shall have the duties and powers as specified in the Community Redevelopment Law and as may be assigned or delegated to them by resolution of the Redevelopment Agency. SECTION 5. CEQA. The adoption of this ordinance, without the performance of subsequent discretionary acts of the City Council and/or the Redevelopment Agency which have not yet been planned, identified, formulated, or defined will not have any effect on the environment within the scope of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.). In addition, the adoption of this ordinance constitutes the reorganization of local governmental agencies and is therefore exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15320 of Title 14 of the California Administrative Code. SECTION 6. FILING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE. The City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this ordinance to be filed in the office of the Secretary of State, and in addition, shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the ordinance to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ' , 1991. ATEEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor lune S. Greek, City Clerk 2\ORD$\91-08 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS. I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 91-08 was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 12th day of March, 1991. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 19__, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney 2\ORD5\91-08 3 ITEM NO. 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager March 26, 1991 Item 12, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24133-1 PREPARED BY: City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: conditions of approval. Approve final Tract Map No. 24133-1 subject to the BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize the staff report on this item and forward it to you under separate cover. JSG ITEM NO. 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECUI. A AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager March 26, 1991 Item 13, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24133-2 PREPARED B~ City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDA T/ON: conditions of approval. Approve final Tract Map No. 24133-2 subject to the BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize the staff report on this item forward it to you under separate cover. JSG and ITEM NO. 14 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager March 26, 1991 Item 14, Approval of Final Tract Map No. 24133-3 PREPARED B~ City Clerk June S. Greek RECOMMENDATION: Approve final Tract Map No. 24133-3 subject to the conditions of approval. BACKGROUND: The staff will finalize the staff report on this item and forward it to you under separate cover. JSG ITEM NO. 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT.' City Council/City Manager Planning Department March 26, 1991 Ordinance Amendment 91-1 PREPARED BY: Steve Jiannino RECOMMENDATION: Ordinance No. 91- entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending portions of Ordinance 90-04 pertaining to Extensions of Time Approval Periods for Plot Plans". APPLICA T/ON INFORMATION APPLICANT.' City of Temecula PROPOSAL: Amend Ordinance 348, Section 18.30 (f) to allow time extensions for plot plan approvals. L OCA T/ON: City wide BACKGROUND: In reviewing the processing for Plot Plan Applications it was determined that, unlike Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits, no mechanism existed within the code to allow for requests for a time extension for plot plan approvals. Due to the change in processing requirements for plot plans, it is staff's opinion that it is inappropriate to treat plot plans differently than conditional use permits or public use permits. 3\Staffrpt\OrdAmd91.1 -1 - DISCUSSION: On February 25, 1991, the City of Temecula Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on Ordinance Amendment No. 91-1. The Planning Commission recommended approval of Ordinance Amendment No. 91-1 by a 4-0 vote. Ordinance Amendment No. 91-1 is an amendment of the code to allow for extensions of time for plot plans in a similar manner to the processing for conditional use permits. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and the Planning Commission Recommendation of Approval, the Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: Introduce Ordinance No. 91-~ entitled "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Temecula amending portions of Ordinance 90-04 pertaining to Extensions of Time Approval Periods for Plot Plans". Attachments: Ordinance Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 25, 1991 Planning Commission Minutes dated February 25, 1991 3\Staffrpt\OrdAmd91.1 -2- Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Environmental Action: Ordinance Amendment No. 91-01 City of Temecula City-wide Amend Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.30 (f) to allow time extensions for plot plan approvals Categorically Exempt Approval Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City Hall, 43180 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Steve Jiannino , City of Temecula Planning Department (714) 694-6400 PLACE OF HEARING Temporary Temecula Community Center 27475 Commerce Center Drive Temecula, California 92390 DATE OF HEARING TIME OF HEARING: Tuesday. March 26. 1991 7:00 PM ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING PORTIONS OF ORDINANCE NO. 90-0~ PERTAINING TO EXTENSIONS OF TIME APPROVAL PERIODS FOR PLOT PLANS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. City Ordinance No. 90-0q adopted by reference certain portions of the Non-Codified Riverside County Ordinances, including Ordinance No. 3~8. Article XVIII, Section 18.30 (f) of Ordinance 3q8 is hereby amended to read as fol lows: "f. Approval Period. The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from its effective date, or within such additional time as may be set into the conditions of approval, which shall not exceed a total of three (3) years; otherwise, the approval shall be null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an approval is required to be used within less than three (3) years, the applicant may, prior to its expiration, request an extension of time on which to use the approval. A request for extension of time shall be made to the Planning Commission, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning Director, accompanied by a fee as set forth in Ordinance No. 671. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of a request for extension, The Planning Director shall review the application, make a recommendation thereon, and forward the matter to the Planning Commission Secretary, who shall place the matter on the regular agenda of the Planning Commission. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon a determination that a valid reason exists for applicant not using the approval within the required period of time. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of three (3) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued dligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be determined in the same manner as applications for conditional use permits and public use permits pursuant to Section 18.26". SECTION 2. Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 6 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law, SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council Members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 26th day of March , 1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 91 - was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26th day of March , 1991, and that thereafter said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 26 th day of March , 1991 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS June S. Greek, City Clerk Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 8 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 25, 1991 Case No.: Ordinance Amendment 91-1 Prepared By: Steve Jiannino Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 91-17 recommending approval of Ordinance Amendment 91-1 APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: ANALYSIS: City of Temecula Amend Ordinance 3~;8, Section 18.30 (f) to allow time extension for plot plan approvals. City wide. In reviewing the processing for Plot Plan Applications it was determined that, unlike Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits, no mechanism existed within the code to allow for requests for a time extension for plot plan approvals. Due to the change in processing requirements for plot plans, Staff determines that it is inappropriate to treat plot plans differently than Conditional Use Permits or Public Use Permits. When the City incorporated, the land use authority of the Planning Director was changed and plot plans are required to be approved by the Planning Commission or the City Council; prior to incorporation, the Planning Director was authorized under the County to approve plot plans at Planning Director Hearings. Currently, the processing of plot plans and conditional use permits are similar with the exception that plot plans are not afforded the opportunity for extensions as are conditional use permits. Staff feels that the code should be changed to reflect consistent review requirements of the projects. Staff is recommending that the code be amended to allow plot plans to have the same three (3) year maximum approval period as Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits with an original approval period of two {2) years or less Staffrpt\OrdAmd91.1 \mb 9 with the possiblity of a time extension to extend the approval to a maximum of three (3) years. Staff is also recommending that Ordinance 348 Section 18.30 (f), approval period, be amended to read similar to Section 18.28 (f) regarding Conditional Use Permits. T. he following is the proposed wording for 18.30 (f), Approval Period: Ordinance 348 Section 18.30 (f) The approval of a plot plan shall be valid for a period of two (2) years from its effective date thereof, or within such additional time as may be set into the conditions of approval, which shall not exceed a total of three (3) years; otherwise, the approval shall be null and void. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if an approval is required to be used within less than three (3) years, the applicant may, prior to its expiration, request an extension of time on which to use the approval. A request for extension of time shall be made to the Planning Commission, on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be filed with the Planning Director, accompanied by a fee as set forth in Ordinance No. 671. Within thirty (30) days following the filing of a request for extension, The Planning Director shall review the application, make a recommendation thereon, and forward the matter to the Planning Commission Secretary, who shall place the matter on the regular agenda of the Planning Commission. An extension of time may be granted by the Planning Commission upon a determination that a valid reason exists for applicant not using the approval within the required period of time. If an extension is granted, the total time allowed for use of the approval shall not exceed a period of three (3) years, calculated from the effective date of the approval. The term "use" shall mean the beginning of substantial construction of the use that is authorized, which construction must thereafter be pursued diligently to completion, or the actual occupancy of existing buildings or land under terms of the authorized use. The effective date of a plot plan shall be determined in the same manner as applications for Conditional Use Permits pursuant to Section 18.26. GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: The project is a Code amendment to allow Plot Plan approvals to have the same approval periods as Conditional Use Permits and Public Use Permits. It is anticipated that these approval periods will be reflected in the Zoning Code adopted for the new Staffrpt\OrdAmd91.1 \mb 10 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: SRJ:mb Attachments: 1. 2. Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb General Plan. Therefore, this project will be consistent with the new General Plan and Zoning Code or will be amended by the new Zoning Code. The project is exempt form CEQA under Sectrion 15061 (b) (3). This project does not have a potential for causing a signficant affect on the environment. This Ordinance Amendment does not increase densities or allow any uses by right. It only provides for the possible extension of time for a previously approved plot plan. There is reasonable probability that Ordinance Amendment 91-1 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the subject request involves an amendment to Section 18.30 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance, which pertains to the an extension of time for Plot Plan Approvals, which may be consistent with the goals and /or policies of the City's future General Plan. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed Ordinance Amendment is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that a new Zoning Code will be adopted for the new General Plan. Therefore, it is likely that the City will consider this amendment during their preparation of the General Plan. e The project is exempt from CEQA review under Section 15061 (b)(3) due to the fact the project does not allow any increased densities' or intensity of use nor does the project allow uses by right. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution 91~ recommending to the City Council approval of Ordinance Amendment 91-1 providing an Extension of Time for Plot Plans based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report. Resolution Draft Ordinance 11 RESOLUTION NO. 91-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 91-1 TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 348, SECTION 18.30 If) TO ALLOW A TIME EXTENSION PROCEDURE FOR PLOT PLAN APPROVALS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS. WHEREAS, The City filed Ordinance Amendment 91-1 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Ordinance Amendment was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Ordinance Amendment on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing. the Commission recommended approval of said Ordinance Amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: la) There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 12 (b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the proposed Ordinance Amendment, makes the following findings, to wit: 1. There is reasonable probability that Ordinance Amendment 91-1 will be consistent with the City~s future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law, due to the fact that the subject request involves an amendment to Section 18.30 (f) of the Zoning Ordinance, which pertains to the an extension of time for Plot Plan Approvals, which may be consistent with the goals and /or policies of the City~s future General Plan. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future General Plan, if the proposed Code Amendment is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that a new Zoning Code will be adopted for the new General Plan. Therefore, it is likely that the City will consider this amendment during their preparation of the General Plan. e The project is exempt from CEQA review under Section 15061 (b)(3) due to the fact the project does not allow any increased densities or intensity of use nor does the project allow uses by right. D. The Ordinance Amendment is compatible with the health, safety and welfare of the community. Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 13 SECTION 2 RECOMMENDATION. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission herelby recommends approval of Ordinance Amendment 91-1 to amend Ordinance No. 348, Section 18.30 (f), to allow a time extension procedure for Plot Plan Approvals to be consistent with Conditional Use Permits. SECTION 3 PASSED, ~,PPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of February, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Staffrpt\OrdAmd91. l\mb 14 RESOLUTION NO. 91-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING OF REVISION NO. 2 TO PLOT PLAN NO. 10579 TO OPEN A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED "GUEST USE" ONLY RESTAURANT TO THE PUBLIC ON A PARCEL CONTAINING 8.7ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF RANCHO CALIFONIA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 944-020-001 WHEREAS, Bedford Properties filed Revision No. 2 to Plot Plan No. 10579 in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS. said Revised Plot Plan application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Revised Plot Plan on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Plot Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received a copy of the Staff Report regarding the Revised Plot Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That theTemecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approvin9 projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: There is a reasonable probability that the land use or action proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 6 There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, (c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan. (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County. including the area now within the boundaries of the City, At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan, C. The proposed Revised Plot Plan is consistent with the SWAP and meet the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan, (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that Plot Plan No. 10579 Revision No. 2 as proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c). no plot plan may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The overall development of the land is STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 7 designed for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare; conforms to the logical development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of the surrounding property. (2) The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed Revised Plot Plan, makes the following findings, to wit: There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the City's General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State Law due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated commercial land use and design guideline standards. be There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted General Plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that it conforms with present or planned land use of the area and is consistent with the Southwest Area Plan and Specific Plan 180. The proposed use or action complies with State Planning and Zoning laws. due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the existing Specific Plan Designation of Office/Professional. do The site is suitable to accomodate the proposed land use in terms of size and shape of lot configuration,parking circulation and access due to the fact that adequate area is provided for the proposed use and parking and circulation as designed are in conformance with City Standards, also internal circulation, traffic conflicts and landscaping were addressed in the original Conditions of Approval of Plot Plan No. 10579. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare due to the fact that the proposed project is compatible with surrounding land uses and conditions stated in the approval are based on measures necessary to reduce or STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 8 eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the original approval or the present or planned land use. Said findings are supported by maps, exhibits and documents associated with this application and are herein incorporated by reference due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibit and Conditions of Approval. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECTION 3, the Plot Plan proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves Revision No. 2 to Plot Plan No. 10579 to open a previously approved "guest use" only restaurant to the public located on the southwest corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 9~4-020-001 subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto, SECTION 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN STAFFRPT\PP10579. RP2 9 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of February, 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFR PT\PP10579. RP2 10 ITEM NO. 16 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department March 26, 1991 First Extension of Time Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 PREPARED BY: Richard Ayala RECOMMENDAT ION: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 22627 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Van Daele REPRESENTATIVE: RanPac Engineering Corporation PROPOSAL: 220 lot residential subdivision of 53 acres. First Extension of Time. LOCAT ION: North of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearny Road. EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (Multiple-Family Dwelling) R-5 {Open area. combining developments ) zoning-residential SURROUNDING ZONING: North: R- 1 South: R-R East: SP 213 West: SP 213 (Single-Family Dwelling) ( Rural-Residential ) ( Winchester Properties) (Winchester Properties) PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested STAFFRPT\VTM22627 1 EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Vacant North: Vacant South: Vacant East: Vacant West: Single Family Total Acreage: 53 No. of Lots: 220 Proposed DU/Acre 4.2 DU/AC Proposed Min. Lot Size: 4,630 SWAP allowed Density: 2-5 DU/AC First Extension of Time application for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 was submitted to the City on Sept 26, 1990. On February 25, 1991, it was presented to the City of Temecula Planning Commission and was approved by a ~-0 vote based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the revision of Condition No. 2, No. 18, No. 21, and the deletion of Condition No. 5, a copy of revised Conditions of Approval is attached. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 is a proposal to subdivide approximately 53 acres into 220 single family residential lots with a minimum lot size of ~,630 square feet. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 is made up of two phases which are independently owned. Phase No. 1 is owned by Lyon Communities, Inc., and is composed of 93 lots. Phase No. 2 is owned by Van Daele Rancho 126, Ltd., and consists of 127 lots. The subject site is located north of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearny Road. Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. RA: ks STAFFRPT\VTM22627 2 Attachments: Resolution Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 25, 1991 Development Fee Checklist Planning Commission Minutes dated February 25, 1991 STAFFR PT\VTM22627 3 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Businns Park Drive Temecula, California 92390 A PUBLIC HEARING hem been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 Van Daele North of Nicolas Road and Fa~ of General Kearny Road First extension of time for a 220 lot subdivision of approximately 53 acres. Environmental Action: N/A Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those i~sues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula City Hall, 43180 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Richard Ayala , City of Temecula Planning Department (714) 694-6400 PLACE OF HEARING Tenlpor~ Temecula Community Center 27475 Commerce Center Drive Temecula. California 92390 DATE OF HEARING TIME OF HEARING: Tuesdv, March 26. 1991 7:00 PM ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 22627 A 220 LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION OF 53 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF NICOLAS ROAD AND EAST OF GENERAL KEARNY ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 919-350-022, 024, AND 025. WHEREAS, Van Daele filed the Time Extension in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances, which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Time Extension. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Time Extension on March 26, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Time Extension; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Time Extension; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. the following findings: Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time. the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 4 (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits. each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code. to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 5 c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. ( 1 ) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), no Time Extension may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The proposed subdivision does not affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. (2) The City Council, in approving the proposed Time Extension, makes the following findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated residential development standards. b) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land use and design guidelines standards. c) The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the project site's existing R-2 IMultiple Family Dwellings) land use designation. ST AFFRPT\ VTM22627 6 d) e) f) g) h) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all proposed residential structures; adequate landscaping is provided along the project~s public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions are in conformance with adopted City standards. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project, Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land uses; and adequate area and design features provide for siting of proposed development in terms of landscaping and internal traffic circulation. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site (R-2; Multiple Family Residential), and also consistent with the adopted Southwest Area Community Plan ISWAP) designation of commercial. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the Negative Declaration adopted by the County for the project, due to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval. STAFFR PT\Vi'M22627 7 The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project currently proposes two independent access points from Nicolas Road and North General kearny Road which have been. determined to be adequate by the City Engineer. j) The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the site plan and the project analysis. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECT ION 2, the Time Extension proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves The First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map 22627 for a 220 lot residential subdivision of 53 acres located north of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearny Road and known as Assessor's Parcel No. 919-350-022, 02~, and 025 subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment II, attached hereto. SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 1991. RONALD J. PARKS MAYOR STAFFRPT\VTM22627 8 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of March. 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCI LMEMBERS NOES: COU N C I LMEMB ERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK STAFFRPT\VTM22627 9 ATTACHMENT II CiTY OF TEMECULA ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of'a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. ~60 has been pre~ious~y~s~or~r~cmcn~th C~A- ~ q3- which- ~rnonst r at~-tcr ~q~-sat~ sfaetion- ~f- t he- £-ity- t hat - the- kartd d~ider-has-13ro~idecf-fo~-the satisfied reqardinq payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. q60. T~ ~he-f~ap: Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy. (Amended per Planning Commission Meeting 2-25- 91) No building permits shall be issued by the City for any residential lot/unit within the project boundary until the developer's successor~s-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with public facility financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/unit shall be deposited with the City as mitigation for public library development. This conditionally approved Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 will expire one (1) year after the original expiration date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is September 1L~, 1991· T~w~3d'rv~de~sha!F~wi~to~ Plal~iln~)il~t~r an-agreemerrL~th-~he ~he-~-~~-pr~~ r~atio~-~e-~-~ (Deleted per Planning Commission Meeting 2-25-91 ) STAFFRPT\V'I:M22627 10 Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. e The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. e The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. 460. PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: e The developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies a_~s determined necessary by the City Enqineer or his desiqnated Representative: I Amended per Planning Commission Meeting 2-25-91) Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and Parks and Recreation Department. e 10. All road easements and/or street dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall befree from all encumbrances as approved by the City Engineer. In the event road or off-site right-of-way are required to comply with these conditions, such easements shall be obtained by the developer; or, in the event the City is required to condemn the easement or right-of-way, as provided in the Subdivision Map Act, the developer shall enter into an agreement with the City for the acquisition of such easement at the developer's cost pursuant to Government Code Section 66q62.5, which shall be at no cost to the City. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 11 11. The subdivider shall construct or post security and an agreement shall be executed guaranteeing the construction of the following public improvements in conformance with applicable City standards, Street improvements, including, but not limited to: pavement, curb and gutter, medians, sidewalks, drive approaches, street lights, signing, striping, and other traffic control devices as appropriate. b. Storm drain facilities. c. Sewer and domestic water systems. 12. Street lights shall be provided along streets adjoining the subject site in accordance with the standards of Ordinance No. ~61 and as approved by the City Engineer. 13. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. The subdivider shall submit four prints of a comprehensive grading plan to the Engineering Department. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, and as may be additionally provided for in these Conditions of Approval. The plan shall be drawn on 2L[" x 36" mylar by a Registered Civil Engineer. 15. The subdivider shall submit four copies of a soils report to the Engineering Department, The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. 16. Prior to final map, the subdivider shall notify the City's CATV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to CATV Standards at time of street improvements. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: 17. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: STAFFRPT\VTM22627 12 PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT: 18. The site is in an area identified on the Flood Hazard Maps as Flood Zone A subject to flooding of undetermined depths. Prk~-~r~he-approvel-~f-erry p+ans; ~This project shall comply with the rules and regulations of FEMA for development within a Flood Zone "A" whid~rmay-~nch~de-obtakrirrc~-te~ter-~f rm~r~vision-From~-EMA. {Amended per Planning Commission Meeting 2-25- 91) 19. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 20. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. 21. E)evelepe~shaH-pa~-a~-capkta+ ~ee~r-eoad-impre~ei~c. ~ts and-pabiiefacHi(-ies h'n posed- tq3o~ .'L'he- .p ~..q3 e tty' ~3~ 13roj ec~-irm-I udi r~j- ~het -~or~ ~reff~c- ar~ l~UbH c o r- (~n a ~ - ~ - ~ac~ - ~a~ -~ - ~ ~~ - ~ ~o~ - ~ - ~e~~ ~ ~ase H ~-~e ~eve~er ~H ~u~ (~A~cmen{ ~ ~ay~ ~ ~H c- Fac~ -Fee; - a- co~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ re~ e~ {~ ~~.--~e~r~n~~~~~ree~~-req~re-the ~n~~-~cess~(~~~~~~~-be~(~he ~jcct ~a~ ~~ ~-~ec~caH~ves~ts~~ s~crease; Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy the developer shall pay either ( 1 ) a public facility mitiqation fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or proiect, includin~ that for traffic and public facility mitiqation as required under the EIR/Neqative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee; or, (2) the current development mitiqation fee with the applicable R~ional Statistical Area as set fo~h in Ordinance No. 659, whichever is less at the time of payment. (Amended per Planning Commission Meeting 2-25-91 ) Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 22. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for North General Kearny Road, and shall be included in the street improvement plans. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 13 23. A signing plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for Sierra Moore Drive, Silver Ridge Court, Bogart Place, Cross Creek Court, and Pauma Valley Road and can be shown on the street improvements or as a separate plan. 24. Prior to designin9 any of the above plans, contact Transportation Engineerin9 for the design requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: 25. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 26, All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 27. All Conditions of approval stated in the County Road Department letter dated July 27, 1988 shall still apply to this project. 28. The Secondary access point shall not utilize the temporary construction intersection at Joseph Road and Nicolas Road as the secondary point of ingress/egress. STAFF R PT\VTM22627 14 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 22627 DATE: AMENDED NO. 2 EXPIRES: STANDARD CONDITIONS The subdivider shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless th[County of Riverside, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, its advisory agencies, appeal boards or legislative body concerning Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627, which action is brought about within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. The County of Riverside will promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding against the County of Riverside and will cooperate fully in the defense. If the County faits to promptly notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding or fails to cooperate fully in the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision ~p Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule A, unless modified by the conditions listed below. This condttionall~ approved tentative map will expire two years after the County of Riverside Board of Supervisors approval date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance 460. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance 460. The subdivider shall submit one copy of a soils report to the Riverside Count), Su_rveyor's Office and two copies to the Department of Building and Safety. The report shall address the soils stability and geological conditions of the site. If any grading is proposed, the subdivider shall submit one print of comprehensive grading plan to the Department of Building and Safety. The plan shall comply with the Uniform Building Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457 and as maybe additionally provided for in these conditions of approval. VESTIll; TEITATIVE ~ I0. Z2627, /~!. f~ Conditions of Approval Page 2 7. A grading permit shall be obtained from the Department of Building and Safety prior_to co~nencement of any grading outside of county maintained road right of way. 8. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid prior to recordation of the final map. 9. The subdivider shall comply with the street improvement recommendations outlined in the Riverside County Road Department's letter dated 7-2~-B8, a copy of which is attached. Legal access as required by Ordinance 460 shall be provided from the tract map boundary to a County maintained road. 11. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the public and shall continue in force until the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Road Commissioner. Street names shall be subject to approval of the Road conzntssioner. .' Easements, when required for roadway slopes, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the fin~ map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as directed by the County Surveyor. 13. Water and sewerage disposal facilities shall be installed in accordance with the provisions set forth in the Riverside County Health Department's letter dated 7-25-88, a copy of which is attached. 14. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control recommendations outlined by the Riverside County Flood Control Otstrtct's letter dated 7-27-8B, a copy of which is attached. Xf the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10,25 of Ordinance 460, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by the Road Commissioner. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement reco~nendations outlined in the County Fire Marshal's letter dated 7-26-88, a copy of which is attached. 16. The subdivider shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Department of Building and Safety transmittal dated 7-26-88, a copy of which is attached. 17. Subdivision phasing, including any proposed common open space area mprovement phasing, if applicable, shall be subject to Planning epartment approval. Any proposed phasing shall provide for adequate IlT:STI#GTEMTATZVETILRCTIO. Z2627, Amd. ~2 Conditions of Approval Page 3 vehicular access to all lots in each phase, and shall substantially conform to the intent and purpose of the subdivision approval. 18. Lots created by this subdivision shall comply with the following: a. All lots shall have a minimum size of 4630 square feet net. b. All lot length to width ratios shall be in conformance with Section 3.8C of Ordinance 460. c. Corner lots and through lots, if any, shall be provided with ~dditional area pursuant to Section 3.BB of Ordinance 460 and so as not to contain less net area than the least amount of net area in non-corner and through lots. d. Lots created by this subdivision shall be in conformance with the development standards of the R-2 zone. When lots are crossed by major public utility easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3,600 square feet, exclusive of the utility easement. Graded but undeveloped land shall be maintained in a weed-free condition and shall be either planted with interim landscaping or provided with other erosion control measures as approved by the Director'of Building and Safety. M1 street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on ~lectrtcal plans submitted to the Oepartment of Building and ~afety or plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 and the Riverside County Comprehensive Senera1 Plan. Upon approval of this vesting tentative tract map, Tentative Tract Map No. 20. 21430 and L~h~aa[ :f Zont No.-46L~, as they pertain to the subject site, shall be null aria void and of no further force or effect. Prior to RECORDATION of the final map the following conditions shall be sattsftea: a. Prior to the recordation of the final map the applicant shall submit written clearances to the Riverside County Road and Survey Department that all pertinent requirements outlined in the attached approval letters from the following agencies have been met: County Fire Department ounty Flood Control ounty Parks Department County Health Department County Planning Department VESTZRG TEXTATiVE ~ II0. 22627, ilmd. f2 Conditions of Approval Page 4 Ce Prior to the recordation of the .final map, Change of Zone No. 5119 shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors and shall be effective. Lots created by this land division shall be in conformance with the development standards of the zone ultimately applied to the property. Prior to recordation of the final map, the subdivider shall convey to the County fee simple title, to all common or common open space areas, free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessment, leases (recorded and unrecorded) and easements, except those easements which in the sole discretion of the County are acceptable. As a condition precedent to the County accepting title to such areas, the subdivider shall submit the following documents to the Planning Department for review, which documents shall be subject to the approval of that department and the Office of the County Counsel: 1) A declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions; and 2) A sample document conveying title to the purchaser of an individual lot or unit which provides that the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions is incorporated therein by reference. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions submitted for review shall (a) provide for a term of 60years, (b) provide for the establishment of a property owners' association comprised of the oners of each individual lot or unit and (c) contain the following provisions verbatim: "Notwithstanding any provision in this Oeclaratton .to contrary, the following provision shall apply: the The property owners' association established herein shall, if dormant, be activated, by incorporation or otherwise, at the request of the County of Riverside, and the property owners' association shall unconditionally accept from the County of Riverside, upon the county's demand, tttle to all or any part of the 'common area', more particularly described on Exhtbtt'E' attached hereto. The decision to require activation of the property owners' association and the decision to require that the association unconditionally accept title tothe 'common area' shall be at the sole discretion of the County .of Riverside. In the event that the common area, or any part thereof, is conveyed to the property owners' association, the association, thereafter shall own such 'common area', shall manage and continuously maintain such 'common area', or any part thereof, absent the prior written consent of the Planning Otrector of the VESTII~ TENTAliVE TRACT RO. 22627, ~d. #2 Conditions of Approval Page $ County of Riverside or the County's successor-In-Interest. The property owners' association shall have the rtght to assess the owners of each Individual lot or unlt for the reasonable cost of mlntatntng such 'coneon area', and shall have the rlght to lien the property of any such owner who defaults tn the pa~nent of a maintenance assessment. An assessment 1ten, once created, shall be prior to all other 1tens recorded subsequent to the nottce of assessment or other document creattng the assessment 1ten. Thts Oeclaratton shall not be terminated, ~substant~ally' amended or property aleannexed therefrom absent the prtor wrttten consent of the Planntng 01rector of the County of Riverside or the County's successor-In-Interest. A proposed amendment shall be considered 'substantial° tf tt affects the extent, usage or maintenance of the 'common area** In the event of any contqtct between thts Declaration and the Arttcles of Incorporation, the Bylaws, or the property owners' association Rules and Regulations, tf any, thts Oeclaratton ~ha11 control.' Once approved, the declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be recorded at the same ttme that the ftnal map ts recorded. The developer shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of all slopes, landscaped areas and Irrigation systems unttl such ttme as those operations are the responsibilities of other parttes as approved by the Planntng 01rector. e. R ftnal plan of development shall be submitted for Planntng Department approval pursuant to Sectton 7.11g of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. The ftnal plan of develo~ent shall contatn the following elements: a. The s?te's ftnal gradtrig plan Co R ftnal stte plan showtrig the lots, butldlng footprints, all setbacks, yard spaces and tqoor plan and elevation assignments to tedtvtdual lots. Construction plans of the '"dwellings to be constructed tn the subdivision. The plans shall be tn a form suttable for submission to the Department of Butldtng and Safety for plan checking. A t~yptcal mechanical plan showtng the locatton and placement of mechanical equipment for Individual dwellings. VESTXRG TE]tTATXVE TRACT RO. 22627, /~d. t2 Conditions of Approval Page 6 21. The required final plan of development shall be in substantial conformance with the project's approved grading plan, site plan, floor plans and elevations except as provided for in Section 7.11g{2). f. This subdivision may be recorded in phases subject to the following: Proposed phasing, including phase boundaries, sequencing and floor plan selection, shall be subject to Planning Director's app?oval. Each proposal phase shall comply with the provisions of Section 7,11 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. If any phase of the suNivision will be developed with fewer than the approved number of floor plans, the cumulative mix of floor plans resulting from the sequential recordation of phases shall comply with Section 7.11f(3) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348. Prior to recordation of the final map, an Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the final map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently filed with the office of the County Surveyor. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded with copies of the recorded final map to the Planning Department and the Department of Building and Safety. ho The following note shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet: 'County Geological Report No. 352 was prepared for this property and is on file at the Riverside County Planning Department.' Prior to the issuance of GRADING PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prior 'to the IssUance of grading permits detailed common open space area landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Department approval for the phase of development in process. The plans shall be certified by a landscape architect, and shall provide for the following. 1. Permanent. automatic Irrigation systems shall be installed on all landscaped areas requiring irrigation. 2. Landscape screening where required shall be designed to be opaque up to a minimum height of six (6) feet at maturity. 3. All utility service areas and enclosures shall be screened from view with landscaping and decorative barriers or baffle VFJTIMG TERTATIVE TRACT ~0. 22627, Amd. d2 Conditions of Approval Page 7 treatments, as approved by the Planntng Director. Utilities shall be placed underground. Parkways and landscaped building setbacks shall be landscaped to provide visual screening or a transition into the primary use area of the site. Landscape elements shall include earth betming, ground cover, shrubs and specimen trees in conjunction with meandering sidewalks, benches and other pedestrian amenities where appropriate as approved by the Planning Oepartment. 5. Landscaping plans shall incorporate the use of specfmen accent trees at key visual focal points within the project. Where street trees cannot be planted within right-of-way of interior streets and project parkways due to insufficient road right-of-way, they shall be planted outside of the road right-of-way. 7. Landscaplng plans shall incorporate native and drought tolerant plants where appropriate. All existing specimen trees and significant rock outcroppings on the subject property shall be shown on the proJect's grading plans and shall note those to be removed, relocated and/or retained. 9. All trees shall be minimum double staked. growing trees shall be steel staked. Weaker and/or slow Any oak trees removed with four (4) inch or larger trunk diameters shall be replaced on a ten (10) to one (1) basis as approved by the Planntng Otrector. Replacement trees shall be noted on approved landscaping plans. If the project is to be phased, prior to the approval of grading permits, an overall conceptual grading plan shall be submitted to the Planning Director for approval. The plan shall be used .as a guideline for subsequent detailed grading plans for individual phases of development and shall include the following: Techniques which will be utilized to prevent erosion sedimentation during and after the grading process. and 2) Approximate time frames for grading and Identification of areas which may be graded during the higher probability rain months of January through March 3) Preliminary pad and roadway elevations VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT RO. 22627, )ed. f2 Conditions of Approval Page 8 22. 4) Areas of temporary grading outside of a particular phase I All cut slopes located adjacent to ungraded natural terrain and exceeding ten (10) feet in vertical height shall be contour-graded incorporating the following grading techniques: 1) The angle of the graded slope shall be gradually adjusted to the angle of the natural terrain. 2) Angular forms shall be discouraged. The graded form shall reflect the natural rounded terrain. 3) The toes and tops of slopes shall be rounded with curves with radii designed in proportion to the total height of the slopes where drainage and stability permit such rounding. 4) Where cut or ftll slopes exceed 300 feet in horizontal length, the horizontal contours of the slope shall be curved in a continHous, undulating fashion. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide evidence to the Director of Building and Safety that all adjacent off-site manufactured slopes have recorded slope easements and that slope maintenance responsibilities have been assigned as approved by the Director of Building and Safety. Prior to the issuance of BUXLDXNG PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: . No butldtng permits shall be issued by the County of Riverside for any residential 1ot/untt within the project boundary untt1 the developer's successor's-in-interest provides evidence of compliance with publtc factltty financing measures. A cash sum of one-hundred dollars ($100) per lot/untt shall be deposited with the Riverside County Department of Butldtng and Safety as mitigation for publtc library development. All butldtng plans for all new structures shall incorporate, all required elements from the subdtviston's approved fire protection plan as approved by the County Fire Marshal. c. Butldtng elevatt'ons shall be tn substantial conformance with that shown on Exhibit D (Design Manual). d. Katerlals used tn the construction of all buildings shall be tn substantial conformance with that shown tn Exhtbtt O (Color Elevations) and Exhibit O (Materials Board). YESTII~ TE#TATIVE TRACT IIO. 2~7627, Amd. f2 Conditions of Approval Page 9 23. ee Prtor to the issuance of butldtng permtts, landscaping and Irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planntng Department approval. The plans shall address all areas and aspects the tract requiring landscaping and Irrigation to be Installed Including, but not limited to, parkway planting, street trees, slope planting, and Individual front yard landscaping. f. All dwellings to be constructed wtthtn thts subdivision shall be destgned and constructed wtth ftre retardant (Class A) roofs as approved by the County Ftre Ratshal. g. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted wtthtn the subdivision, however solar equipment or any other energy savtng devtces shall be permitted wtth Planntng Department approval. h. Butldtng separation betveen all buildings tncludtng~ftreplace~%hall not be less than ten (10) feet. t. All street stde yard setbacks shall be a mtntmum of ten (10) feet. All front yards shall be provided wtth landscaping and automatic irrigation. Prtor to the tssuance of OCCUPANCY PERMITS the following conditions shall be satisfied: Prtor to the ftnal butldtng Inspection approval by the Butldtng and Safety Oepartment, a six foot high wall shall be constructed along the south lot 1tries of lots 165 through 219. The required wall shall be subject to the approval of the Director of the Department of Building and Safety a0d the Planntng Director. Prtor to the ~nal butldtng Inspection approval by the Butldtng and Safety Department a six foot high ¢hatn link fence shall be constructed along the south boundar~ of the Santa Gertrudts Creek Flood Channel. The requtred fence shall be subject to the approval of the 01rector of the Department of Butldtng and Safety. W111 and fence locations shall con¢om to attached Exhtbtt F. ~all and fence mtertals and destgn shall confom to those shovm In Exhtbtt O (Destgn ~nual). do All landscaping and Irrigation shall be installed tn accordance wtth approved plans prior to the tssuance of occupancy permits. If seasonal conditions do not permit planting, interim landscaping and erosion control measures shall be utilized as approved by the Planning Director and the Director of Building and Safety. YESTIRG TERTATIVE 111ACT II0. 22627, /Ired. #2 Conditions of Approval Page 10 ge !~:SC 8/23/88 Prior to the ftnal building Inspection approval by the Building and Safety Department, ,landscape screening, desfgned to be opaque up to a minimum height of six feet at maturity, shall be installed along the south boundary of the Santa Gertrudts Creek adjacent to the chain 1tnk fence. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 461. Street trees shall be planted throughout the subdivision in accordance with the standards of Ordinance 460. ILl t, ,i LeRoy D. Smoot C:)*~U~q, IONEI & COUNTY SUIV~vOm~ OFFICE OF ROAD COMMISSIONER 6 COUNTY SURVEYOR ,,July 27, 1988 COUNTY &C)idlNISTI~ATiYr CENTEI~ Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA g250! Re: Tract Map 29627 - Amend Schedule A - Team 1 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Oepartment receammnds that the landdivider provide the following street improvement plans and/or road dedications in accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 461). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, ali existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's, and that their omission or unacceptabiltty may require the map to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring in ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11. They are intended to be complementary and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvement. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Comissioner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from damages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, I.e., concentra- tion of diversion of triow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities including enlarging existing facilities or by securing a drainage easement or by both. All drainage easements shall be shown on the ftnal map and noted as follows: 'Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed'. The protection shall be as approved by the Road Department. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Commissioner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article X! of Ordinance No..460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Department. ,luly ..27, 1988 Page 2 3. Major drainage is tnvolved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Department. I 4. Sierra Moore Drive, Silver Ridge Ct., Cross Creek Ct., Bogart P1. and Pauma Valley Road shall be improved within the dedicated right of my in accordance with County Standard No. 104, Section A. (40'/ (4o' / 6o' ) 5. The landdivider shall provide utility clearance from Eastern I~nictpal Water District prior to the recordation of the final map. o 10. 11. 12. The minimum centerline radii shall be 250' or as approved 'by the Road Oepartment. Nicolas Road shall be Improved with concrete curb and gutter located 43 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction; or resurfactng of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 55 foot half width dedicated right of my in accordance with County Standard No. 100. The minimum lot frontages along the cul-de-sac shall be 35 feet. All driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards and shall be shown on the street improvement plans. minimum of four feet of full height curb shall be constructed between driveways. A When blockwalls are required to be constructed on top of slope, a debris retention wall shall be constructed at the street right of way line to prevent silting of sidewalks as approved by the Road Cam~tsstoner. The minimum garage setback shall be 30 feet measured from the face of curb. North General Kearny Road shall be improved with 34 feet of asphalt concrete pavement within a 45 foot part width dedicated right of way In accordance with County Standard No. 103, Section A. (22'/ 33'). Tract Hap ZZ6Z7 - Amend ,)uly' 27, 1988 Page 3 14. 16. 17. 18. 20. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed throughout the landdivision in accordance with 'County Standard No. 400 and 401 (curb sidewalk). Primary and secondary access roads to the nearest paved road main- ' tatned by the County shall be constructed within the public right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 106, Section B. (32' /60') at a grade and alignment as approved by the Road Commissioner. This is necessary for circulation purposes. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Riverside County Road Department, a cash sum of $X50.00 per lot as mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. Improvement plans shall be based upon a centerline profile extending a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade and alignment as approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road improvements does not imply acceptance for ma ! ntenance by County. Electrical and communications trenches shall be provided in accordance with Ordinance 46X, Standard 8Z7. Aspbaltic emulsion (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen days following placement of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applied at a rate of 0.05 gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion shall conform to Sections 37, 39 and 94 of the State Standard Specifications. Standard culJde-sacs shall be constructed throughout the land division. Corner cutbacks In conformnce with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map and offered for dedication. Lot access shall be restricted on Nicolas Road and so noted on the final map. Landdivisions creattng cut or fill slopes adjacent t~ the streets shall provide erosion control, sight distance control and slope easenents as approved by the Road Department. 23. 24. All centerline intersections shall be at 90* with a minimum $0' tangent measured from flow line. The street design and improvement concept of this project shall be coordinated with TR 21430, TR 23280 and TR 23428. Tract.Nap 22627 - Amend t2 July 27, 1988 Page 4 25. Street lighting shall be required in accordance with Ordinance 460 26. 27. 28. and 461 throughout,the subdivision. The County Service Area (CSA) Administrator detehntnes whether this proposal qumliftes under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the land owner shall file an application with LAFCO for annexation into or creation of a 'Lighting Assessment Otstrict' in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. All private and public entrances and/or Intersections opposite this project shall be coordinated with this project and sho~ on the street improvement plans. A striping plan is required for Nicolas Road. The removal of the existing striping shall be the responsibility of the applicant. Traffic signing and striping shall be done by County forces with all Incurred costs borne by the applicant. The crossing over the Santa Gertrudts Creek at North General Kearny Road shall be as approved by the Road Department and Flood Control. GH:lh Very truly yours, 6us Hughes Road Division Engineer County o! ltlverslcle TO: FROM: RE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTI~ENT DATE: July 25, 1988 t~nez~e~~,., Sr. Sanitarian, Envlronmental Health Services Tract Hap 22627 I The Environmental Health Services has reviewed Tract Map 22627, Amended No. 2 dated July I~, 1988. Our current comments will remain as previously stated in our letter dated February 15, 1988. $H:bo GEN. PORM 4, (!~4v. ~] RI~$IDE COU~ P~ING 'D~T. 4080 Lemon Street ~E~sIgEC0UN~ All'g: David Wahlgren RE; Tract Nap 22627: Being i division of Parcel I through 4 of Parcel Nap ?364 as sho~n by map on file in Book S0, Pages 20 and 21 of Parcel Naps in the Office of the County Recorder, County of Riverside, State of California. (224 Lots) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has reviewed Tentative Hap No. 22627 and recouends that: t water system shall be installed according to plans and specification as approved by the water company and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be submitted in triplicate, with a minimum scale 'not Less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1, Chapter ? of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California,when applicable. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following certification: 'I certify that the design of the water system in Tract Hap 22627 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Water District and that the water service,storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide water service to such tract. This certification does not constitute i guarantee that it will supply water to such tract at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose'. This certification shall be signed by & responsible official of the water company. [I ~iverside County Planning Dept. Page Two Attn: David ~ahlgren February $, 1988 This Department has a statement from the Rancho California Water District agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with %he subdivider. It viii be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Eastern Municipal Water District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sever system shall be installed according to plans and , specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, Complete profiles, pipe and joint specifications and the size of the severs at the junction of the new system to the existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be signed by a registered engineer and the sever district with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the sever 'system in Tract Map 22627 is in accordance with the sewer system expansion plans of the E~stern Municipal Water District and that the vaste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated vastes from the proposed Surv~yor's Office to review at least two weeks prior to the £~g~!~_[~£_~h~_recordation of the final maR. ,Riverside County Planning Dept. Attn David W&hlgren Page %ree February 5, 1988 It viii bi necess&ry for the fin~nci&l .rr&ngements to be Lade prior to the record&tion of the fin&l ~&p. It viii'be necess&ry for the &nnex&tion proceedings to be completely fin&lized prior to the record&tion of the fin&l - Sincerely, Environment.l He&lth Services SH:t&c ,KIrNi~IETH L.. EDWARDS 1lIB kARl(LeT ii?Mir[T P.O. BOX 1053 TIr~ IEPHON~: (714) ?e?-201B RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. / Area: .~'~"1-~ '~.~J;, V,~//,~ Re: Me have revtewed this case and have the following con~nents: Except for nuisance nature local runoff which may traverse portions of the property the project ts considered free from ordinary storm flood hazard. However, · storm of unusual magnitude could cause some damage. New construc- tion should comply with all applicable ordinances. The topography of the area conststs of well defined ridges and natural water- courses ~htch traverse the property. There is adequate area outside af the natural watercourses for building sties. The natural watercourses should be kept free of. buildings and obstructions tn order to maintain the natural drainage patterns of the area and to prevent flood damage to new buildings. A note should be placed on an environmental constraint sheet stating, 'All hey buildings shall be floodproofed by elevating the finished floors a minimum of ]8 tnches above adjacent ground surface. Erosion protection shall be provided for mobile home supports." Thts pro~ect ls tn the dratnage plan fees shall be paid in regulations. Area accordance with the applicable r~les and The proposed zontng ts consistent with extsttng flood hazards. Some flood control facilities or floodproofing may be required to fully develop to the tmplted density. The Oistrtct's report dated ~d~v. ~, /?gg ts sttll current for this project. The District does not object to the proposed minor change. The attached coments apply. Very truly yours, CC: KENNETH L. EDWAROS ,~,,t,,Ef Engineer entor Civil £n~tneer BATE: :IrNNETH L. EDWARDS P.O. BOX I033 TIr~ I'PNONi~ (7S4) 7117.~Q18 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT March 9, 1988 ! Riverside County Planning Department County Administrative Center Riverside, California Attention: Regional Team No. 1 David Wahlgren Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Vesting Tract 22627 This is a proposal to divide about 56 acres in the Santa Gertrudis Valley area. The site is between Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road and along the north side of Santa Gertrudis Creek. Our review indicates that almost the entire property is located within the Santa Gertrudis Creek 100 year flood plain as delin- eated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The developer proposes to construct a flood control channel along the site's south boundary to convey the flows from Santa Gertrudis Creek and drain all the onsite and offsite storm runoff into this channel through street or storm drain Systems. Local offsite storm flows are tributary to the east property boundary, no indication is shown how the flows would be handled. Following are the District's recommendations: This tract is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Santa Oertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage fees shall be paid as set forth under the provisions of the "Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans", amended July 3, 1984: Drainage fees shall be paid to the Road Commissioner as part of the filing for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map, or if the recording of a final parcel map is waived, drainage fees shall be paid as a condition of the waiver prior to recording a certificate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map; or be At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting defermerit of the payment of fees, the drainage fees shall be paid to the Building Director at the time of issuance of a grad- ing permit or building permit for each approved par- cel, whichever may be first obtained after the ~ .... ~:~F of the subdivision final map or parcel map; Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 22627 -2- March 9, 1988 Drainage fees shail be paid to the Road Commissioner as a part of the filing for record of the subdivision final map or parcel map, or before receiving a waiver to record a land division, for each lot within the land division where construction activity as evi- denced by one of the following actions has occurred since May 26, 1981: (a) A grading permit or building permit has been obtained. (b) Grading or structures have been initiated. The proposed channel should be constructed to the Distrtct's standards. The design of the proposed flood control channel should utilize the following assumptions: a. Design discharge = 7800 cfs b. Freeboard = 2 feet 'c. Effects of transitions, curves and bridge piers should be included in the hydraulic analysis. The following should be included in the design: a. The channel should be soft bottomed. Invert should be maintained at natural grade to pre- vent headward erosion or downstream siltation. · Side banks should be hardened with concrete or riprap, which should extend from the top of bank to a depth below flow line based on design velocities. No levees viii be permitted. All building sites ad- Jacent to the channel should be constructed above the adjacent top of channel. Access roads should be provided along each side of the channel. Offsite training dikes may be necessary to guide flows toward the channelized section. Offsite ease- ments should be secured from the affected property owners. Alternatively, facilities should be "pulled back" ohsire. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 2262? -3- March 9, 1988 Prior 'to initiation of the final construction drawings for those facilities required to be built as part of the Hurrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan, the developer should contact the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to ascertain the terms and conditions of design, construction, inspection, transfer of rights of way, project credit in lieu of fees and reimbursement schedules which may apply. Tit~e re- ports and title insurance must be provided for all right of way to be transferred to the District. The developer should note that if the estimated cost for required area drainage plan facilities exceeds the required drainage fees and the developer wishes to receive credit for reim- bursement in excess of his fees, the facilities will be constructed as a public works contract. Scheduling for construction of these facilities will be at the discre- tion of the District. Permission should be secured from the upstream property owner if any increase in water depths greater than 6 inches is proposed and from the downstream property owner for the concentration of flows· Copies of these docu- ments' should be submitted to the District for review prior to recordation of the final map. All lots abutting the proposed flood control channel should be elevated above 100 year flood water surface. Offsite storm flows tributary to the property form the east should be collected and safely conveyed through the property to Santa Gertrudis Creek. Ohsire drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, eDrainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions'. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easements obtained from the affected property owner(s). The document(s) should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. All lots should be graded to drain to the adjacent street or an adequate outlet. Riverside County Planning Department Re: Vesting Tract 22627 March g, 1988 10. ! The 10 year storm flow should be contained within the curb and the 100 year storm flow should be contained within the street right of way. When either of these criteria is exceeded, additional drainage facilities should be installed. 11. Drainage facilities outletting sump conditions should be designed to convey the tributary 100 year storm flows. Additional emergency escape should also be provided. 12. A drainage easement should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or di- verted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map. 13. Evidence of a viable maintenance mechanism should be sub- mitted to the District and County for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Temporary erosion control measures should be Implemented Immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downstream properties or drainage facil'lties. 15. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recorda- tion of the final map. Grading plans 'should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits, Questions concerning this matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at 71#/787-2333. Very truly yours, Rancho Pacific Engineering KENNETH L. EDWARDS /~OHN H. KASHU'B-A ~enior Civil Engineer RC:bab RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION W~TN THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY KAY 7-26-88 PLANNING DEPARTMENT TEAM L DAVID WAHLGREN TR 22627 - A~NDBD Plannln~ & F-~'ine~rln~ Office 44~0 lemon S~reet, ~aite I 1 Riverside, CA 92501 ('/14) ?8?-66O6 With respect to the con~/tions of approval for the above referenced ~and division, the Fire Department recon~nends the following fire protection measures be provided ~n accorclance with l~verside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection s~andaxd~: FIRE PROTECTION Schedule 'A" fire protection approved standard fire hydrants, (6"x4"x2{") located one at each street intersection an~ spaced no more than 330 feet apart in'any direct£on, with rioport,on of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fare flow shall be 1000GPM for 2 hours duration at 20 PSI. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and spacing, and, the system shall muet the fire flow requirements. Plans shall be signed/a~proved by e registered civil engineer and the local water company wi~h the following certification= ~I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the ~iverside County Fire Department.# The required water sy~em, /ncluding fire hydrants, shall be ~nstalled and accepted by the a~propriate water agency~rior to any c~mbustiblebuil~ingmaterialbeing placed on an in~ividual lot. MITIGATION Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the R~verside County Fire Department, · cash sum of $400.00per lot/unit &s m/tigation for fire protection impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the t/me of payment, he/she may enter into a written agreement with the County deferring said payment ~o the time of issuance of & building perm/t. A11 questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning~ndEngineering staff. RAYMOND H. REGIS Chief Fire Department Planner ?' U, George S.~Tatum, Planning Officer County Administrative Center · 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor Riverside, California 92501-3661 July 26, 1988 Riverside County Planning Department Attentionz David Wahlgren County Administrative Center Riverside, CA 92501 RE~ Vesting Tract 22627, Amend #2 Ladies and Gentlemen~ The Land Use Division of the Department of Building and Safety · has the following comments and conditions~ Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer shall obtain Planning Department approval for all on-site and off- site signage advertising the sale of the subdivision pursuant to Section 19.6 of Ordinance 348. Fireplaces may encroach 1' into required minimum 5' side yard setback. Mechanical equipment may not be located in required minimum 5' side yard setback. Very truly yours, Thomas H.,Ingram, Director DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY Norman A. Lostbom, Deputy Diz~ctor Land' Use Division , ~ "-~i.~'re'ion (714) 787-2020 ~'~ ")'~ ~ 1 Cou ty of 1:1' DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY .~, John Bi$choff, SuDervising Planner June 11, 1986 ~O~, Eric Traboulay, Deputy Director Review of Liquefaction R~port for Tract 21430 We have reviewed the re~orts entitled: Liquefaction Evaluation, Tentative Tract No. 21430 Rancho California Area, Riverside County, California, dated Feb- ruary 5, 1986; prepared by Pioneer Consultants, J.N. 3686-003 Addendu~ to Report Dated February 5, 1986, dated March 24, 1986; prepared by Pioneer Consultants, J.N. 3686-003 and reviewed the information with Pioneer Consultants in a meeting June 6, 1986. In addition, additional information was sent to Pioneer Consul.tants in a regist'ered letter dated June 9, 1986, regarding reported historic high groundwater elevations in Nicholas Valley. Pioneer Consultants has ~oncluded that although they expect liquefaction at depth, they do not expect a detrimental effect to the proposed devel- olaaent and no special mitigatSon rec~t,~tenda~ions were made. ./ Case No.: Recommendation: ATTACHMENT I II STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 25, 1991 Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627, First Extension of Time Prepared By: Richard Ayala Recommend APPROVAL of the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No, 22627, APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: PROPOSAL: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Van Daele Rancho 126, Ltd. RanPac Engineering Corporation First Extension of Time North of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearny Road, R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) R-5 (Open Area Combining Zoning-Residential Developments ) North: R-1 (One-Family Dwelling) South: R-R (Rural Residential) East: Specific Plan No, 213 (Winchester Properties) West: Specific Plan No, 213 (Winchester Properties ) Not requested. Vacant North: South: East: West: Vacant Vacant Vacant Single Family Residential STAFFRPT\VTM22627 15 PROJECT STATISTICS: Total Acreage: Total Lots Proposed: Proposed Density: Proposed Minimum Lot Size: SWAP Allowed Density: 53 acres 220 lots 4.2 DU/AC 4,630 sq. ft. 2-5 DU/AC BACKGROUND: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ANALYSIS: Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 was recommended for approval on September 14, 1988 by the Riverside County Planning Commission in conjunction with Change of Zone No. 5119. Change of Zone No. 5119 was a request to change the zoning on 53 acres from R-R (Rural Residential) to R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) and R-5 {Open Area Combining Zone - Residential Developments). Both Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 and Change of Zone No. 5119 were approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 25, 1988. Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627 is a proposal to subdivide approximately 53 acres into 220 single family residential lots with a minimum lot size of 4,630 square feet. Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627 is made up of two phases which are independently owned. Phase No. 1 is owned by Lyon Communities, Inc., and is composed of 93 lots. Phase 2 is owned by Van Daele Rancho 126, ltd., and consists of 127 lots. The subject site is located north of Nicolas Road and east of General Kearny Road. Desiqn Considerations The proposed subdivision has been designed in accordance with the standards of the R-2 ( Restricted Single Family) zone and Ordinance Nos. 348 and 460. The main access to the project is provided by North General Kearny Road. Density The proposed subdivision { Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627) has a density of 4.2 DU/AC. The Southwest Area Community Plan {SWAP) calls for 2- 5 DU/AC. Thus, meeting the SWAP residential density requirement. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 16 GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: ENV I RONMENTA L DETERMINATION: FINDINGS: The proposed density of 4.2 DU/AC is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan designation of 2-5 DU/AC. In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project will be consistent with the new General Plan when it is adopted. On October 25, 1988, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32361. Environmental Assessment No. 32361 indicated that the site may impact or be impacted by liquefaction, dam inundation, agriculture, Stephen's Kangaroo Rat habitat, archaeological resources, schools, libraries, and Mt. Palomar Observatory. However, these impacts will be mitigated through the Conditions of approval for Vesting Tentative Tract No. 22627. Therefore, Staff is not requesting any further environmental determination. There is a reasonable probability that this project will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated residential development standards. e There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land use and design guidelines standards. The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the project site's existing R-2 (Multiple Family Dwellings) land use designation. STAFFR PT\VTM22627 17 e The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all proposed residential structures; adequate landscaping is provided along the project's public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions are in conformance with adopted City standards. The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the public health or welfare. due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The harmony in scale, bulk, height, density and coverage creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land uses; and adequate area and design features provide for siting of proposed development in terms of landscaping and internal traffic circulation. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area. due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site (R-2; Multiple Family Residential), and also consistent with the adopted Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) designation of commercial, The project as designed and conditioned will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the Negative Declaration adopted by the County for the project, due to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval. STAFFRPT\VTM22627 18 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project currently proposes two independent access points from Nicolas Road and North Ceneral kearny Road which have been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer· 10. The design of the subdivision, the type of improvements and the resulting street layout are such that they are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the site plan and the project analysis. 11. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report, Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council: APPROVAL of the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, based on findings contained in the Staff Report· RA:ks Attachments: Conditions of Approval Exhibits STAFFR PT\VTM22627 19 CITY OF TEMECULA ~ ./ 2~8~ VICINITY MAP CASE NO. ~/~-~ P.C. DATE Z-~-5'"-c~/ k,. ( CITY OF TEMECULA ) C- ZONE MAP ) f "% CASE NO. P.C. DATE Z-.Z':J-..-'~/ CITY OF TEMECULA LI J i.-t1 --- /2 AC MIN' SWAP MAP ~ CASE NO. P.C. DATE i EXHIBIT C,A~E #, aX'Hmrt ,,~- .S CASE # /,,'~-,~,4 ~_._7_~.~ EXHIBIT CASE # EXHIBIT CASE # LzgzzI~/A\/d~-I-I¥/$ 88-6-£ palecl £ 'ON uo?,!puoD (speo~ Xluno3 ) SI. 'ON uo!l!puoD 'ON uop,!puoD · ON uo!l!puoD t 'ON uo!l!puoD le^oJddV :[o uo!1!puo:3 IO.~luoD pool=l /~l!l!oe-I o!lqnd (uo!le6p,!161 leu6!s 3!j~ed/) Al!l!oe:l o!lqnd (uo!le&!;!l/4 3!~Jed/) Alm. l!oe-I o!lqnd ( Xqtu!nO ) uo[lea~oa~l pue s)t~ed (~e~-)l) ueld uo!le^JasuoD lel!qeH · ~,ua.fo~d s!q,. ol X~,il!qeo!ldde J!aql o1 a^ilelad ))e;s Aq pa~ai^ad a~a~ saa{ 6u{~OllOt aqj_ LZ9ZZ 'ON del/4 loeJj_ a^?,elua/ bu!lsa^ 'atu!/ jo uo!sua;x3 ls~!-I :'ON 3SVS) /SI-!)!S)3HS) 33:1 .LN3161dO-13^3CI VqrI331~3± _-I0 ~.11D AI 1N31'~HDVIIV .Z EXHIBIT CASE # ~ _/,.,- .U81HX3 ' M ATTACHMENT IV CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: First Extension of Time. Vestinq Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation ( Quimby ) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility ( Traffic Signal Mitigation) Public Facility ( Library ) Fire Protection Flood Control IADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. I Condition No. 2 Condition No. 21 Condition No. 15 ( County Roads) Condition No. 3 Letter Dated 7-26-88 Letter Dated 3-9-88 STAFFRPT\VTM22627 20 ~.c-- z(~/ .Lle!HX~ I=1.1 rn I PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 1991 determined necessary by the City Engineer or his designee:". GARY THORNHILL advised of the following modifications to the Conditions of Approval: Condition N~./2 and Condition No. 5 are a duplication, Condition No.W5 deleted and Condition No.¥2 revised to read, "The subdivider shall submit to the Planning Director verification that Section 10.35 Ordinance No. 460 has been satisfied regarding payment of parks and recreation fees in accordance with Section 10.35 of Ordinance No. 460. Verification shall be submitted prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy."; Condition No. 21 revised to read, "Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy the developer shall pay either (1) a public facility mitigation fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project, in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee; or, (2) the current development mitigation fee with the applicable Regional Statistical Area as set forth in Ordinance No. 659, whichever is less at the time of payment." CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M. JOHN ABLE, 106 Sweetwood Court, Riverside, representing the applicant expressed concurrence with the Conditions of Approval as modified. Mr. Able questioned the wording in Condition No. 18. DOUG STEWART explained staff's revision to that Condition which addressed his concern. Mr. Able suggested the wording "prior to the approval of any plans be deleted" because all the plans had been approved. Staff concurred. COMMISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing at 7:40 P.M. and Approve the First Extension of Time for Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 22627 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions ofj. Approval with revision of ConditiOn~o[ 2, ~No. 18 andJNo. 21 and deletion of Condition 5 as directed by staff, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Hoagland, Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: i COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PCMIN2/25/91 -9- 2/26/91 ITEM NO. 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Planning Department March 26. 1991 First Extension of Time Tentative Parcel Map 23335 PREPARED BY: Richard Ayala R ECOMMEN DAT ION: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: Bedford Properties REPRESENTATIVE: Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates PROPOSAL: Six (6) commercial lot subdivision of 10.18 acres. First Extension of Time LOCATION: North of Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. EXISTING ZONING: C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial) SURROUNDING ZONING: North: I-P South: C-P-S East: C-P-S West: C-P-S { Industrial Park ) ( Scenic Highway Commercial) ( Scenic Highway Commercial ) ( Scenic Highway Commercial) PROPOSED ZONING: Not requested STAFFRPT\TPM23335 1 EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: PROJECT STATISTICS: BACKGROUND: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Vacant North: Industrial Park South: Commercial East: Vacant West: Commercial Total Acreage: 10, 18 No, of Lots: 6 First Extension of Time application for Tentative Parcel Map No, 23335 was submitted to the City on September 18, 1990. On February 25, 1991. it was presented to the City of Temecula Planning Commission and was approved by a 4-0 vote based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, The property is located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road, At present, the subject site is vacant and graded land, Westerly of the property, there is an office building. a Carl's Jr.. and graded land, The subject site is currently zoned C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial ). Planning Department Staff recommends that the City Council: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving the First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No, 23335 based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, RA:ks Attachment: e Resolution Conditions of Approval Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 2S, 1991 Development Fee Checklist Planning Commission Minutes dated February 25, 1991 STAFF R PT\TPM23335 2 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 43172 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92390 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No: Applicant: Location: Proposal: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 Bedford Properties North of the Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road Fh'st Extension of Time for a Six (6) Lot Commercial Subdivision Environmental Action: N/A Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing(s) or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing(s) described in this notice, or in written correspondences delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing(s). The proposed project application(s) may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Planning Department, 43180 Business Park Drive, Monday through Friday from 9:00 AM until 4:00 PM. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Richard Ayala, City of Temecula Planning Department, (714)694-6400. PLACE OF HEARING DATE OF IIEARING TIME OF 1tEARING Tem0orary Temecula Community Center 27475 Commerce Center Drive Temeculn Tuesday. March 26. 1991 7:00 PM ATTACHMENT I RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335 A SIX (6) PARCEL COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10.18 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF JUNCTION OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NOS. 910- 110-029, 031, AND 910-180-018. WHEREAS, Bedford Properties Inc. filed the Time Extension in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use. Zoning, Planning and Subdivision Ordinances. which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission recommended approval of said Time Extension. WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing pertaining to said Time Extension on March 26, 1991, at which time interested persons had opportunity to testify either in support or opposition to said Time Extension; and WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the Commission proceedings and Staff Report regarding the Time Extension; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: ll) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 3 (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of buildin9 permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The City Council finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits. pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. STAFF R PT\T PM23335 ~ c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances, D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c). no Time Extension may be approved unless the following findings can be made: a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances, b) The proposed subdivision does not affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the public, (2) The City Council. in approving the proposed Time Extension, makes the following findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan. which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated commercial development standards. b) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted general plan. if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land use and design guidelines standards, c) The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws. due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the project site~s existing C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial) land use designation, STAFFRPT\TPM23335 d) e) f) g) h) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all proposed facility structures; adequate landscaping will be provided along the project's public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions will be in conformance with adopted City standards. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The density creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land uses; and has adequate area in order to provide for siting of proposed development. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site ( C-P-S; Scenic Highway Commercial) and also consistent with the adopted Southwest Area Community Plan {SWAP) designation of Commercial. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the Negative Declaration adopted by the County for the project, due to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 6 i) The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project will propose independent access points from Winchester Road and Possibly Ynez Road which have been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer. j) The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the site plan and the project analysis. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECT ION 2, the Time Extension proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and is compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Conditions. That the City of Temecula City Council hereby approves The First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map 23335 for a six (6) parcel Commercial Subdivision of 10.18 acres located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road and known as Assessor's Parcel Nos. 910-110-029,031, and 910-180-018 subject to the following conditions: A. Attachment A, attached hereto. SECTION 3. Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of March, 1991. RONALD J PARKS MAYOR STAFFRPT\TPM23335 7 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof. held on the 26th day of March, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS JUNE S. GREEK CITY CLERK STAFFRPT\TPM23335 8 ATTACHMENT II CITY OF TEMECULA ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 Commission Approval Date: Expiration Date: Planninq Department Unless previously paid, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall comply with the provisions of Ordinance No. 663 by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance. Should Ordinance No. 663 be superseded by the provisions of a Habitat Conservation Plan prior to the payment of the fee required by Ordinance No. 663, the applicant shall pay the fee required by the Habitat Conservation Plan as implemented by County ordinance or resolution. Prior to any construction on the area shown as remainder, the applicant shall file for a Certificate of Compliance with the Planning Department. This conditionally approved extension of time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will expire one year after the original expiration date, unless extended as provided by Ordinance ~60. The expiration date is October ~, 1991. Enqineerinq Department The following are the Engineering Department Conditions of Approval for this project, and shall be completed at no cost to any Government Agency. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Engineering Department. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows all existing easements, traveled ways, and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further consideration. The Developer shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act, and all applicable City Ordinances and Resolutions. The final map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered Civil Engineer, subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision Map Act and Ordinance No. ~60. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 9 PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: As deemed necessary by the City Engineer or his representative, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: Rancho California Water District; Eastern Municipal Water District; Riverside County Flood Control district; City of Temecula Fire Bureau; Planning Department; Engineering Department; Riverside County Health Department; CATV Franchise; and CalTrans. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall provide evidence that Assessment District 161 will construct the improvements on Winchester Road, in accordance with County Standard 100, Section A (110'/13~'). In the event that the Assessment District 161 will not construct the improvements, the developer shall be required to construct or bond for the required improvements. Sufficient right-of-way along Winchester Road shall be confirmed to exist or conveyed for public use to provide for a public street for public use to provide for a 67 foot half width right-of-way. Corner property line cut off shall be required per Riverside County Standard No. 805. 10. A declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC~,R's) shall be prepared by the developer and submitted to the Director of Planning, City Engineer and City Attorney. The CCF, R's shall be signed and acknowledged by all parties having any record title interest in the property to be developed, shall make the City a party thereto, and shall be enforceable by the City. The CC~,R's shall be reviewed and approved by the City and recorded. The CCF, R's shall be subject to the following conditions: a. The CC~,R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense. be The CCF, R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Planning, City Engineer and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interest of the City and its residents. Ce The CCSR's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 10 The CC~,R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas and facilities. ee The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be provided by CC~,R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 11. County Road Condition Number 1~ shall be deleted. 12. Prior to recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit with the Engineering Department a cash sum as established, per lot, as mitigation towards traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment of traffic signal mitigation fee, he may enter into a written agreement with the City deferring said payment to the time of issuance of a building permit. 13. The developer shall record an Environmental Constraint Sheet delineating the area within the 100-year floodplain. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS: A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The charge shall equal the prevailing Area Drainage Plan fee rate multiplied by the area of new development. The charge is payable to the Flood Control District prior to issuance of permits. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY: 15. Construct full street improvements including but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior public streets. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 11 16. Developer shall pay any capital fee for road improvements and public facilities imposed upon the property or project, including that for traffic and public facility mitigation as required under the EIR/Negative Declaration for the project. in the amount in effect at the time of payment of the fee. If an interim or final public facility mitigation fee or district has not been finally established by the date on which Developer requests its building permits for the project or any phase thereof, the Developer shall execute the Agreement for Payment of Public Facility Fee, a copy of which has been provided to Developer. Developer understands that said Agreement may require the payment of fees in excess of those now estimated (assuming benefit to the project in the amount of such fees) and specifically waives its right to protest such increase. Transportation Enqineerinq PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP: 17. A signing and striping plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by CalTrans and the City Engineer for Winchester Road and Ynez Road, and shall be included in the street improvement plans. 18. Prior to designing any of the above plans, contact CalTrans and City Transportation Engineering for the design requirements. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF ANY ENCROACHMENT PERMITS: 19. A construction area traffic control plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by the City Engineer for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the City Engineer. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF OCCUPANCY PERMITS: 20. All signing and striping shall be installed per the approved signing and striping plan. 21. All Conditions of Approval stated in the County Road Department letter dated June 23, 1988 shall still apply to this project. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 12 RIVERSIDE ClX/NTY PL4J4NING D£PARll, ENT CQNDITIQILS OF N)PROVAL TENTA?I¥[ GQI4~R~I~3. P.4J~EL NAP NO Z333S, .4N). tl The subdivider shall defend, Indemnify, and hold harmless the County of Riverside, 1rs agents, officers, and omployees from an~ claim, actton, or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside or 1rs agents, officers, or employees to attack, set astde, votd, or annul an approval of the County of Riverside, 1rs advtsory agencies, appeal boards or ]egtslatfve body concerning COI~ERCIAL TENTATIVE PARCEL KAP NO. 23335, vhtch ectton ts brought wtthtn the ttme pertod provtded for California Government Code Sectton 66499.37. The County of Riverside ~111 promptly nottfy the subdivider of any such clatm, actton, or proceeding agatnst the County of Riverside and wtll cooperate fully tn the defense. If the County fatls to promptly nottry the subdivider of any such clatm, actton, or proceeding or fatls to cooperate fully tn the defense, the subdivider shall not, thereafter, be responsible to defend, Indemnify, or hold harmless the County of Riverside. The tentattve~Darcel map shall conform to the requirements of Ordinance 460, Schedule E unless modtfted by the conditions ltsted below. Thts approved tentative parc,] map wtll exptre two years after the Board of Supervisors approval date unless extended as provtded by Ordinance 460. 3. The ftnal map shall be prepared by a registered ctvtl engtneer or 11censed land surveyor subject to all the requirements of the State of California Subdivision IMp Act, Riverside County Subdivision Ordinance 460. 4. All road easements shall be offered for dedication to the publlc and she11 conttnue tn force unttl the governing body accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the County Road Countsstoner. Street names shall be sub3ect to approval of the Road Ccxmtsstoner. Easements, vhen requtred for roadv~y s]opes, dratnage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shorn on the final Imp tf wtthtn the land dtvtston boundary. All offers of dedication shall provtde for nonexclusive publlc road and uttltty access. All easements, offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted and recorded as dtrected by the Riverside County Surveyor. 6. Legal access as requtred by Ordinance 460 shall be provtded from the I~rCel map boundary to & County maintained road· 7. A11 delinquent property taxes shall be patd prtor to recordation of the final map. TE)ITA?IV[ PARCEL NAP NO. 23335 Conditions of Approval Page 2 8. Prtor to any gradtng, a Gradtrig Plan tn compliance with the Untform Butldtng Code, Chapter 70, as amended by Ordinance 457, shall be subndtted to the County Department of Butldtn9 and Safety. g. The subdivider shall comply with the street Improvement reconmmndattons outltned tn the County Road Department's letter dated June 23, 1988, a copy of ~htch ts attached. 10. The subdivider shall comply with the environmental health recommmndations outlined in the County Health Department's transmittal dated June 16, 1988, a copy of which is attached. 11. The subdivider shall comply with the flood control reconmmndattons outlined in the Riverside County Flood Control Dtstrtct's letter dated June 22, 1988, a copy of which is attached. If the land division lies within an adopted flood control drainage area pursuant to Section 10.25 of Riverside County Land Dtvtston Ordinance 4GO, appropriate fees for the construction of area drainage facilities shall be collected by' the Road Commatsst~ner prlor to recordation of the ftnal map or watver of parcel map. 12. The subdivider shall comply with the fire improvement reconmmndations outltned in the County Fire Department's letter dated June 13, 1988, a copy of which'Is attached. 13. The subdivider shall comply with the reconm~ndatto~s outlined in the Butldtng and Safe~ Department: Grading Sectton's transmittal dated June 10, 1988, a copy of whtch ts attached. 14. All proposed construction shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palolmr Observatory recommndattons dated Apr11 26, 1988, a copy of whtch ts attached. 15. The subdivider shall comply with the recmmendettons outlined in the County Geologtc Report No. S09 and the Coun~ Geologist letter dated July 13, 1988, · copy of which Is attached. TENTATIVE PARCEL IMP U0.?~33S, /~1~. fl Conditions of Approval Page 3 16. Grading plans shall confofi~ to the Hillside Development Standards as presented in the Comprehensive General Plan. All cut and/or ftll slopes, or individual combinations thereof, which exceed ten feet in vertical hetght shall be modtfted by an appropriate combination of a spectal terracing (benchtng) plan, Increased slope ratto (e.g. 3:1), retaining walls, and/or slope planttng combtned wtth irrigation. All driveways shall not exceed a 15% grade. 17. Lots created by this subdivision shall be tn conformance wtth the development standards of the C-1/C-P zone. 18. All lots created by this land dtvtston shall have a mtntmum area of 0.8 acres gross. 19. When lots a~ crossed by major publlc uttllty easements, each lot shall have a net usable area of not less than 3600 square feet, exclusive of the uttltt~ easement. 20. All lot length to wtdth rattos shall be tn conformance wtth Sectton 3.8¢ of Ordinance460. 21. Corner lots shall be provtded wtth additional area pursuant to Sectton 3.8B of Ordinance 460. Prior to recordation of the ftnal map the land dtvtder shall execute a certificate of noncontiguous ownership. 23. All street 11ghts and other outdoor 11ghttng shall be shown on electrical pl&ns submitted to the Department of Butldtng and Safety for plan check &pproval end shall comply with the requirements of Riverside County Ordinance No. 655 end the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. 24. Prtor to the recordation of the Ftnal Map, the following conditions shall be complied wtth: Change of Zone No. 5163 shall be adopted by the Board of Supervt sots. be A copy of the Envtromental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be transmitted to the Pl&nntng Department for revtew and approval. TENTATZVE PARCEL IMP NO. 2333S NO.. ~1 Conditions of Approval Page 4 , ElrfIROI~E~AL COlISTRAZK SHEEr CONDITIONS: 25. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared vrlth the ftnal map to delineate Identified environmental concerns and shall be permanently ftled wtth the offtce of the County Surveyor. Prtor to the recordation of the ftnal map, a copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planntng Department for revte~ and approval. The approved ECS shall be forwarded vtth coptes of the recorded ftnal map to the Planntng Department and the Department of Butldtng and Safety. The following note(s) shall be placed on the Environmental Constraints Sheet. "County Archaeological Report No. 1217 vas prepared for thts property on Hatch 30, 1988 by Christopher E. Drover PhD, and ts on ftle at the Riverside County Planntng Department. Ce 'County Biological Report #o. 212 vas prepared for thts property tn May 1988 by the Planntng Center, and 1s on ftle at the Riverside County Planntng Department. 'County Geological Report No. sog ~as prepared for thts property tn May, 1988 by Letghton and Associates, and ts on f11e at the Riverside County Planntng Department. Spectftc 1rems of concern tn the report are liquefaction hazards. 25. The following note shall be placed on the ftnal map: 'Constraints affecting thts property are shown on the accompanying Environmental Constraints Sheet, the ortgtnal of whtch ts on ftle at the offtce of the Riverside County Surveyor. These constraints affect all parcels.' GH:aea 7-27-88 LeRoy D. Smoot OFFICE OF ROAD COM,4~IS$10A,'ER 6 COL'NTY SL'RVEYOR Riverside County Planning Commission 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA g2SO! June 23, 1988 Re:. Parcel ~p 23335 - Amnd tl Schedule E - Team 1 Ladies and Gentlemen: With respect to the conditions of approval for the referenced tentative land division map, the Road Department recemmends that the landdivider provide the following street Improvement plans and/or road dedications tn accordance with Ordinance 460 and Riverside County Road Improvement Standards (Ordinance 46X). It is understood that the tentative map correctly shows acceptable centerline profiles, all existing easecents, traveled ways, and drainage courses with appropriate Q's,~and that their emission or unacceptablltty my require the lip to be resubmitted for further consideration. These Ordinances and the following conditions are essential parts and a requirement occurring tn ONE is as binding as though occurring in a11. They are Intended to be complemntar~ and to describe the conditions for a complete design of the improvemnt. All questions regarding the true meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Road Celmtsstoner's Office. The landdivider shall protect downstream properties from denages caused by alteration of the drainage patterns, I.e., concentra- tion of diversion of flow. Protection shall be provided by constructing adequate drainage facilities Including enlarging existing facilities or by securing I drainage easement or by both. All drainage easeaents shall be sho~n on the ftnal mp and noted as follows: =Drainage Easement - no building, obstructions, or encroachments by land fills are allowed'. The protection sh&11 be as approved by the Road Departcent. The landdivider shall accept and properly dispose of all offsite drainage flowing onto or through the site. In the event the Road Camtsstoner permits the use of streets for drainage purposes, the provisions of Article X! of Ordinance No. 460 will apply. Should the quantities exceed the street capacity or the use of streets be prohibited for drainage purposes, the subdivider shall provide adequate drainage facilities as approved by the Road Departwent. Parcel Map 23335 - Amend · 'June 23, lg88 Page 2 3. PMJor dratnage Is involved on this landdivision and its resolution shall be as approved by the Road Depar~nent. The landdivider shall comply with the C41trans recon~nendations as outlined tn their letter dated ~rch 2, 1988 (a copy of which is attached), prior to the recordation of the final map. A copy of the final map shall be submitted to ColtPans, District 08, Post Office Box 23X, Sen Bernardino, California g2403; Attention: Project Development for review and approval prior to recordation. Ynez Road shall be Improved with concrete curb and gutter located 38 feet from centerline and match up asphalt concrete paving; recon- struction; or resurfacing of existing paving as determined by the Road Commissioner within a 50 foot half width dedicated right of way in accordance with County Standard No. 7. All'driveways shall conform to the applicable Riverside County Standards. e Winchester Road Including R.C.W.D. lots fronting Winchester Road shall-be improved with concrete curb and gutter located 55 feet from centerline and mtch up asphalt concrete paving; reconstruction or resurfaclng of existing paving as determined by Caltrans within a 67 foot half wtdth dedicated right of ~my. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the developer shall deposit wtld~ the Raverside County Road deparl~ent, a cash sum of $2,500 per gross acre es mitigation for traffic signal impacts. Should the developer choose to defer the time of payment, he may enter Into e written agreement with the County deferring said pKym~nt to the time of Issuance of e building pemlt. Improvemnt plans sh&11 be based upon a centerline profile extend- trig a minimum of 3IX) feet beyond the project boundaries at a grade end altgmmnt Is approved by the Riverside County Road Commissioner. Completion of road Improvements does not Imply accep~nce for mintanent, by County. A~phelttc ~ulston (fog seal) shall be applied not less than fourteen dkys following placeant of the asphalt surfacing and shall be applted It e rate of O.OS gallon per square yard. Asphalt emulsion she11 confom to Sections 37, 3g and 9¢ of the State Standard ~eclflcations. Parcel Map 23335 - Amend #1 dune 23, 1988 Page 3 12. Corner cutbacks in conformance with County Standard No. 805 shall be shown on the final map mnd offered for dedicmtton. 13. Lot access shall be restricted on Ynez Road and so noted on the final map with the exception of one access opening located at the northwest corner of parcel 1. 14. Lot access shall be restricted on ~rgarlta Road end so noted on the final map with the exception of that portion of parcel X4 abutting Mmrgartta Road. 15. Street lighting shall be required tn accordance with Ordinance 460 and 461 throughout the subdivision. The County Service Arem (CSA) Admtntstrmtor determines whether this proposal qualifies under an existing assessment district or not. If not, the mppltcant shall file mn application with LAFCO for annexmtlon into or creation of a 'Lighting Assessment District' in accordance with Governmental Code Section 56000. 16. Prior to recordation of the final map or mny phase the applicant shall estmbltsh m businessmens assoctmtton to provide for reciprocal parking end legal access. 37. Lot access shmll be restricted on Winchester Road and so noted on the final nmp with the exception of m 35' driveway located between parcels 3 end 4 as approved by Cmltrmns. Mi:lh Very truly yours, Gus Hughes Road Division Engineer County of Riverside TO: .RIV£R$IDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. DATE: June 16. 1988 ~TT~ Glo:z~'~u~c~el , WJ~UJ~1: rt~n-:,.~--~_;.= ~rian. ~v~ronmental Health ~e~ces R!~.: PARCF. L MAP 23t35, Amended No. 1 Environmental Health Services has reviewed Parcel Map 23335, A~ended No. I dated June 9, 1988. Our current comments will remain as stated in our letter dated April 29, 1988. SM: tac 1 1988 RIVE~a~uc CuO~TY PLANNING DEPARTMENT G/I,N. I~ORM 4. (Ib~,. 'COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE , of HEALTH · ,,, .....,w, .~,.0,, 0,,.,,.. ?,3.'I __ ',Y' ~,/Z,,~ ./ . all liMIMI, I. &,ii).L April 29, 1988 LMj')'*. ~ -'-. --;q ~ ; HAY 3 1998 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT. 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92502 Attn: Glori· M&ciel RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~. CA* IPII~'O SOS ~3b'T# lilt 080 ilOlrr# BTAT~ fi!lfT. GA IIOIO. CA 91.1.01 P&i,I II~1111ll iISO MI $$i0il RE; Parcel Hap 23335; Being'situated in Lhe unzncorpor&ted territory of the County of Riverside, St&te of C&lifornx&, and b~xng portions of Lots 114, 118, 239, 141 and 142 together with portions of Lincoln Avenue, Jackson Avenue and Henroe Avenue and ad5oining s·id lots. All ·s shown on map of the Temecula Land and Vater Company on file in Book 8, Page 359 of Haps, Records of San Diego County, Callforn2a. (18 Lots) Gentlemen: The Department of Public Health has revxewed Tentative Hap No. 23335 ~nd recommends that: A water system shall be installed according to plans ·rid specification as ·pproved by the water comp·ny ·nd the Health Department. Permanent przndts of the plans of the water system shall be lubmitted in triplicate, with · minimum sc·le not lesl than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the original drawing to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of v·lves ·nd tire hydrants; pipe and ~oint specific·tions, ·rid the size of the m·in · t the ~unction of the new system to the existing system. The pl·ns sh·11 comply in · 11 respects with Div. S, P·rt 1, Chapter 7 of the C·liforni· He·lab ~nd Safety Code, C&liforni· idministr·tive Code, Title 22, Chapter 16, and General Order No. 103 of the Public Utilities Conlesion of the State of Californi·, when applic·ble. Riverside County Planning Dept. Page Two ALAn: Gloria Haciel April 29, 1988 T~e plans shall be signed b7 t registered engineer and water company with the following certification: "I certify that the design of the water system in Parcel Nap 23335 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho California Mater District and that the water service,storage and distribution system will be adequate to provide w~ter service to such parcel. This certification does not constitute · guarantee that it will supply water to such parcel at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire protection or any other purpose" ~'his certification shall be signed by a responsible official of the water company. least two weeks ~[~or to the r!g~!!!_/or the recordation of the final This Department has · statement from the Rancho California Mater Districl agreeing to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the subdivider. It will be necessary for the financial arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. This Department has a statement from the Kastern Nunicipal Mater District agreeing to allow the subdivision sewage system to be connected to the sewers of the District. The sever system shall be installed according to plans and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor and the Health Department. Permanent prints of the pl~ne of the sewer system shall be submitted in triplicate, &long with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor. The prints shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and 3sins specifications and the size of the severs at the ~unction of the new system to the existing system. k single plat indicating location of sever lines and water lines shall be a portion of the sewage plans ~nd profiles. The plans shall be signed by · registered engineer &nd the sewer district with the following certiFicltion: 'I certify this the design of the se~r system in Parcel Nip 23335 is in Accordance with the sewer system e~lnsion plans of the hstern M~icipll ~ater 9istrict and that the waste disposal system is adequate at this time to treat the Inticipated vastes ;res the proposed parcel." ~iverside County Planning Dept. P&ge Three A~'N: Gloria Haciel April 29, ~988 It viii be necessary for fin&nc3&l arrangements to be made prior to the recordation of the final map. Sincer~lY~Sani am~m M~M~:tinez. ~ ~'~tarian ~nvironmenta! Health Services SM:tac' · KENNrrH I... EDWARDS till MARKrT P. 0 BOX RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WAT£R CONSE!:~VATION DISTRICT RlVa'RIIDw, C&i. IFORNIA June 22, 198B Riverside County Planning Department County A~ministrative Center Riverside, California Attention= Regional Team No. 1 Gloria Macill Ladies and Gentlemen= Re: Parcel Map 23335 Amended Map No. i This is a prOl~Dlal to divide about 10 acrel into several commercial lots in the Santa Gertrudis Valley area. The lite is along the north side of Winchester Road about 1000 feet east of Interstate ~ Our review indicates that the entire property is within the 100 year flood plain caused by Santa Gertrudis Creek which traverses the north portion of the site with an estimated 100 year flow rate of 1[,300 cf$.. The applicant proposes to charmeliza Santa Gertrudil Creek by installing hardened Ilope protection along both banks to protect this development. Thil reach of Santa Gertrudis Creek is a portion of the Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan facilities, and will be operated and maintained by the District if the propclad improvements of Santa Gertrudis Creek is conltructed to Diltrict'l itandardl. Do indication wal made on the lite plan how to collect the flows into the proposed channel and how to pro- ~ect ~he lo~1 along Margarita Road. Following are the Diitrict'l reco~endationlz This parcel map is located within the limits of the Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudil Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted by the Board. Drainage feel Iha11 be paid &l let forth under the provi- sions of the "Rulel and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Planl", amended February 16, 1988~ ae Drainage feel eha11 be paid to the Road Con~issioner as Part of the ~iXing for record of the lubdiviiion final map or paros/ map, or if the recording of & final par- cel map is waived, drainage feel Iha11'be paid as a condition D~ ~he waiver prior ~o recording a certifi- cate of compliance evidencing the waiver of the parcel map= or Riverside County Planning Depar~_ment Parcel Map 23335 Amended Map No. i -2- June 22, 1988 e At the option of the land divider, upon filing a re- quired affidavit requesting deferment of the payment of fees, the drainage fees may be paid to the Building Director at the time of issuance of a grading permit or building permit for each approved parcel, whichever may be first obtained after the recording of the subdivi- sion final map or parcel map~ provided however, this option to defer the fees may not be exercised for any parcel where grading or structures have been initiated on ~he parcel within the prior 3 year period, or per- mits for either activity have been issued on that par- cel which remain active. Prior to initiation of the final construction drawings for those facilities required to be built as part of the Murrieta Creek/Santa Gertrudis Valley Area Drainage Plan, the developer should contact the Riverside County Flood ControL and Water Conservation District to ascertain the terms and conditions of design, construction, inspection, transfer of rights of way, project credit in lieu of fees and reimbursement schedules which may apply. Title reports and title insurance must be provided for all right of way to be transferred to the District. The developer should note that if the estimated cost for required area drainage plan facilities exceeds the required drainage fees and the developer wishes to receive credit for reimbursement in excess of his fees, the facilities will be constructed as a public works contract. Scheduling for construction of these facilities will be at the discretion of the District. Hardened slope protection should be installed along both banks of Santa Gertrudis Creek to District standard. The slope protection should extend from the top of slope to a point below flow line based on design flow velocities. The protection should be tied into the existing crossing under Ynez Road. The proposed channel invert should be designed as close as Possible to ~he existing natural channel*s slope and rela- tive invert elevations. Arrangement should be made to channelize the flows upstream of Margarita Road into the proposed channel ~o protect those lots along Margarita Road~ otherwise, appropriate floodproofing measures should be provided for all the buildings on the lots which are affected by the tributary flows. Any blocking of the tributary flows or significant- ly raising of the upstream water surface caused by the development is not allowed. Riverside County Planning Department Parcel Map 23335 Amended Map No. i -3- June 22, 1988 ® 7e A portion of the proposed project is in a floodplain and may affect "waters of the United States", "we%lands" or =jurisdictional streambeds", therefore, in accordance with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program and Related Regulations (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 73) and County Ordinance No. 458~ a® A flood study consisting of HEC-2 calculations, cross sections, maps and other data should be prepared %o the satisfaction of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FES~) and the District for the purpose of revising %he effective Flood Insurance Rate Map of the project site. The submittal of the study should be concurrent with the initial submittal of the related .project improvement plans and final District approval will not be given until a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) has been received from FEMA. A ~opy of appropriate correspondence and necessary permits from those government agencies from which approval is required by Federal or State law (such as Corps of Engineers 404 permit or Department of Fish and Game 1603 agreement) should be provided to the District prior to the final District approval of the project. Where flows are collected or conveyed offsite, or where offsite construction is required for these purposes, re- corded drainage easements should be secured from the af- fected property owners. Copies of these easements should be submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. If easements are not obtained, hydraulic cal- culations should be submitted for District review which show that no adverse impacts, such as backwater ponding will result from the proposed improvements. This is par- ticularly important in reference to Santa Gertrudis Creek and any impacts ~he proposed improvements might have upon Winchester Road. Lots abutting the proposed channel should be at least 1 foot above the 100 year storm water surface elevation. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right of way should be contained within drainage easements shown on the final map. A note should be added to the final map stating, "Drainage easements shall be kept free of build- ings and obstructions". Riverside County Planning Department Re: Parcel Map 23335 Amended Map No. I -4- June 22, 1988 10. Offsite drainage facilities should be located within publicly dedicated drainage easemen%s obtained from the affected property owners. The documents should be recorded and a copy submitted to the District prior to recordation of the final map. 11. The properry's street and lot grading should be designed in a manner that perpetuates the existing natural drainage patterns with respect to tributary drainage area, outlet points and outlet conditions, otherwise, a drainage ease- ment should be obtained from the affected property owners for the release of concentrated or diverted storm flows. A copy of the recorded drainage easement should be submitted to the District for review prior to the recordation of the final map. 12. Temporary erosion control measures should be implemented immediately following rough grading to prevent deposition of debris onto downs%ream properties or drainage facilities. 13. A copy of the improvement plans, grading plans and final map along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calcula- tions.should be submitted to the District via the Road Department for review and approval prior to recordation of the final map. Grading plans should be approved prior to issuance of grading permits. Questions concerning t. his matter may be referred to Robert Chiang of this office at 714/787-2333. Very truly yours, KENNETH L. EDWARDS Cf Enginee~ cc~ RBF & Associates RCtbab cpm23335 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT IN COOPERATION WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY RAY HEBRARD FIRE CHIEF 6-13-88 TO: PLANNING DEPARTHENT A?TN: TEAN I, GLORIA HACIEL 23335 - AItI~DED ~1 Plmnnln~ & E~glneering (Mice 4080 L~mon Street. Suite ! 1 Riverside, CA 92S01 (714) 787.6606 With respect to the conditions of approval for the above referenced land division, the Fire Department recommends the following fire protection measures be provided in accord·ace with Riverside County Ordinances and/or recognized fire protection ·tandards: FIRE PROTECTION The water maine shall be capable of providing · potential fire flow of 5000 GPN and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 2500 GPN for hours duration at'20 PSI residual operating pressure. Approved super fire hydrants, (6"x&"x2-2t") shall be located at each street intersection and spaced noc more than 330 feet apart in any direction, rich no portion of any lot frontage more than 165 feet from · fire hydrant. The applicant/developer shall provide v~itten certification from the appropriate vster company that the required fire hydrants are either existing or that financial arrangements have been u ads to provide them. Applicant/developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review. Plans shall conform to fire hydrant types, location and opecins, and, the system shall meet the fire flo~ requirements. Plans shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company with the foil·vimS certification: "l certify that the design of the water system is Is accord·ace with the requireeats prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Dept.w The required water system iucludinS fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. All questions regarding the meaning of the conditions shall be referred to the Fire Department Planning and Engineering staff. RAYNOrD H. REGIS Chief fire Department Planner G~orge Tatum, Deputy Fire N~rwhal *'~Om :m-:~.o J,~, (;rading- Buildi~ and Safety ~~. Erading's ariginml cu,.o,ts re in applicable to this case. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY The following 'X ' marked comments pertain to this project. Refer to the attached standard vesting tract comments. The information submitted is too vague for comment. specific Please refer t~ departmental forms 28~-~&, 28~-21, 284- 8&, & 284-12~ when preparing a grading plan. In order to permit your grading plan, items~will be needed. the following a. Obtain grading plan review. b. Provide 3 copies of Preliminary Soils Report Provide I copy of each of the hydrolog¥ - hydraulic review, standard improvement plan, and . d. Provide clearances from the following department. _~__P 1 a,~n i ng ~.. Flood Control -I-Road Department e. Provide copy of Planning Department conditions of approval for the approved or tentative approved Provide an erosion 'control plan prepared by licer~sed lardscape architect. Provide a conceptual gradin~ plan. Observe slope setbacks from permit areas and/or structures per section 7~12 and figure 29-1 of the O~iform Building Code as modified by Ordinance ~57. Driveway grades shall be 15X or less. When obtaining a plan review permiry submit 5 copies of grading plan to Building and Safety for distribution and plan'review. " Show street and pad elevations. Insure that a 1% grade can be maintained from back of p~d to street. 11o 12. Design V-ditches at top of slopes to handle year storm flow. Provide (l) one copy of the hydro]agio/hydraulic calc'=. and drawings. Provide recorded drainage easements for lot to lot drainage. the proposed Show the QI~ and QI~O flows at the inlet and outlet to all properties and at all drainage structure inlets arid outlets. Provide building footprints on lots. 15. ..... PI. This property is located in the Rancho California Potential Subsidence area. Per Board Resolution additional peatechnical information is required. Including the a~phaltic concrete, base material, and earth moved this project will exceed 5~ cubic yards. Theref~re, a grading permit is required. Design each lot to drain separately. Do not use common swales. Pro~ects having an imbalance between the cut and fill shall specify the location of their import or export. · Refer to form 28~-12~ for additional comments. Show slopes, including terraces, to scale. Proposed off-site ~rading Mill require written norarazed permission from the affected property owner. No obstruction or diversion of natural water courses shall be permitted. Provide topography beyond permit area, especially where adjacent property is developed or bein~ developed. Slope height may affect adjacent properties. On flag lots sham the location, grade, cut fills to scale that Mill be required to construct the drive way/access. RiVERSiDE COUntY .Annin DEP, ARQ IEn ' July 13, 1988 Lelghton and Associates 27715 ~efferson Avenue, Sutte 109 Rancho California, CA 92390 Attention: Hr. I:)antel Chu Mr. ~rk Berg~nn SUBJECT: Liquefaction Hazard Pro~ect No. 11880600-01 Tentative Parcel Hap 23335 County Geologtc Report No. 509 Rancho California Area ~entlemn: I~e have revte~ed your report entttled 'Preliminary Geotechntcal Evaluation of Liquefaction PotP~ttal,*. Lots 1'through 18, Winchester Pleado~s, Tentative Tract Hap No. Z3335, ~heast corner of ginchester ~nd Ynez~'Roads, Rancho · California, Riverside County, CA,' dated ~y 1, 1988, ~ your response letter Your ~rt datemined ~t tke potenttal"for 11queflC~J~n'~tsts on the stte for an eerthquake of 6,.~M~l~d~4 ~ht~T','~round,,lcceleratton of 0.419. ~e f~ctor of safety Ig~)n~'14~efactton ts*.tess*-~e~Tor a layer of sotl rangtrig tn dep~ of 10 tb ZO feet bel~ ~e extsttng ground surface. Your report recommended that In ,~r_~der.to reduce the liquefaction potential, one of the fo]loNtn9 alternatives should be follMd: 1. Placement of addttton&l f111 (approxtmtely 10 feet tn thickness) throughout the proposed butldtng and Improvement area to tncrease the overburden pressure. The extsttng 7, feet of compacted ftll on Lots 1 through S vtll provtde the additional measures to mtttgate liquefaction. All buildings and the Improvements such is utilities located ~tthtn Lots $ through 18 should be underlain by at least 10 feet of compacted ft11. The ftll blanket should extend 10 feet beyond the butldtn9 footprint. Remval of Ipproxtmtely 15 feet to ~0 feet of I11uvta1 depostts ind replaced and recompected to it least 90 percent of relattve compaction as datemined by ASTIq D1557-78. 4080 LEMON STREET, g~ FLOOR 4~209 OASIS STREET, ROOM 304 Letghton and Associates - 2 - ~uly 13, 1988 Oenstftcatton of the upper 20-foot subsurface cohesionless matertel to at least g2 percent relattve compaction as determined by AS~ 01557-78, by vtbroflotatton dynamtc compaction, or other techniques. 0 Utilizing post-tensioned slabs for the proposed structures. Thts measure ~11 not etttgate liquefaction potential; however, tf liquefaction should occur and tt is not too severe, postotenstoned sl&bs should help keep the butldtng intact. It is our opinion that the report was prepared tn a competent manner and satisfies the addlttonal information requested under the California Environmental Qualtty Act revte~ and the Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan. Ftnal approval of the report is hereby given. hie recommend that the following note be placed on the Ftnal Map prior to its recordation. 'County Geologtc Report No. $Og ~as prepared for thts property on Pay 1, 1988 by Leighton and Associates, and ts on ftle at the Riverside County Planntng Oepartment. The spectftc 1rems of tnterest are liquefaction and setsmtc destgn of. structures.' The recmmendattons mde tn your report for mitigation of liquefaction potential shall be adhered to tn the destgn and construction of thts pro~ect. Very truly yours, RIVERSIDE COUNTY PLANNZNG DEPART14ENT Roger S. Streeter -Planntng Director/ . Engineering ~eologt ~/c ~//' SAK:rd c.c. Robert Beta, trilltam Frost & Assoc., Robert B. ramble #om Lostbee -Bulldtng & Safety (2) Pl&nntng Tern I - G1orla Mactel CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR PALOMAR OBSERVATORY A~though the proposed project is ~ore than 30 miles from Palomar Observatory, request that any outdoor lighting conform to the following ~ridelines uhich are formulated to u~in~nize the adverse effects of light pollution: Use the minimun auount of light needed for the task. 2. Orient and shield light to prevent direct upward illumination. Turn off lights at 11:00 p.m. (or earlier) unless, in co~nnercial applications, the associated business is open past that time, in which case the lights should be turned off at.closing. Use lovopressure sodium lmnps for roadways, walkways, equipment yards, parking lotl, security and other similar applications. These lights need not be turned off at 11:00 p.m. Adoption of these guidelines viii help preserve the conditions needed for the continuation of research at Palomar Observatory. For further informa- t~on, please call (818) 356-&035. Robert J. Brucaco A~sistanc Director PASADENA CALIFOINIA 11121 TELEPHONE (l?l~ Jle.4O)] TELEX e?142S (::ALTECH PSD ATTACHMENT I II STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 25. 1991 Case No.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 Prepared By: Richard Ayala Recommendation: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335; based on the Analysis and Findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Attached Conditions of Approval, APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTATIVE: P R OPOSA L: LOCAT ION: EXISTING ZONING: SURROUNDING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: EXISTING LAND USE: SURROUNDING LAND USES: Bedford Properties Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates First Extension of Time North of junction of Winchester Road and Road. C-P-S { Scenic Highway Commercial) North: I-P I Industrial Park) South: C-P-S { S c e n i c Commercial ) East: C-P-S { S c e n i c Commercial ) West: C-P-S { S c e n i c Commercial) Not requested Vacant North: South: East: West: Industrial Park Commercial Vacant Commercial Ynez Highway Highway Highway STAFFRPT\TPM23335 13 PROJECT STATISTICS: Total Acreage: No. of Proposed Lots: 10. 18 acres 6 lots BACKGROUND: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on October 4, 1988, along with Change of Zone No. 5163 (R-R to C-P-S). At that time, a Negative Declaration was adopted and the project was found to be consistent with applicable policies in the County's Comprehensive General Plan and zoning requirements. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map No. subdivide approximately commercial lots, as follows: 23335 is a proposal to 10.18 acres into 6 Parcel 1 0.9 acre Parcel 2 1.0 acre Parcel 3 0.8 acre Parcel 4 1.1 acre Parcel 5 0.8 acre Parcel 6 4.5 acre The property is located north of the junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. At present, the subject site is vacant. Surrounding land uses include primarily vacant and graded land. Westerly of the prope~y, there is an office building, a Carl's Jr., and graded land. A commercial center is located across 1-15 to the west. The subject site is currently zoned C-P-S (Scenic Highway Commercial). GENERAL PLAN AND SWAP CONSISTENCY: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is consistent with the Southwest Area Community Plan, which calls out the subject site to be commercial. In addition, Staff finds it probable that this project will be consistent with the new General Plan when it is adopted. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 14 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: On October 4, 1988. the Riverside County Board of Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32718, at which time determined that the Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will mitigate any environmental concerns. Therefore, Staff is not requesting any further environmental determination. FINDINGS: w e There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will be consistent with the City's future General Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated commercial development standards. There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is in conformance with existing and anticipated land use and design guidelines standards. The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the project site's existing C-P-S ( Scenic Highway Commercial) land use designation. The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns. access. and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all proposed facility structures; adequate landscaping will be provided along the project's public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions will be in conformance with adopted City standards. STA FFR PT\T PM23335 15 e e 0 The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The density creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land uses; and has adequate area in order to provide for siting of proposed development. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site ( C-P-S; Scenic Highway Commercial ) and also consistent with the adopted Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) designation of Commercial. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the Negative Declaration adopted by the County for the project, due to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project will propose independent access points from Winchester Road and Possibly Ynez Road which have been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 16 !0. 11. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the site plan and the project analysis. That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning Department Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: ADOPT Resolution 91- approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335, based on the analysis and findings contained in the Staff Report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. RA:ks Attachments: Resolution Conditions of approval Exhibits STAFFRPT\TPM23335 17 RESOLUTION NO. 91-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335 A SIX J6) PARCEL COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION OF 10,18 ACRES LOCATED NORTH OF JUNCTION OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO, 910-011-031 PORTION. WHEREAS. Bedford Properties Inc. filed the Time Extension in accordance with the Riverside County Land Use, Zoning. Planning and Subdivision Ordinances. which the City has adopted by reference; WHEREAS, said Time Extension application was processed in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered said Time Extension on February 25, 1991, at which time interested persons had an opportunity to testify either in support or opposition; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing, the Commission approved said Time Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Findinqs. That the Temecula Planning Commission hereby makes the following findings: A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65360, a newly incorporated city shall adopt a general plan within thirty (30) months following incorporation. During that 30-month period of time, the city is not subject to the requirement that a general plan be adopted or the requirements of state law that its decisions be consistent with the general plan, if all of the following requirements are met: (1) The city is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of the general plan. (2) The planning agency finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, each of the following: a) There is a reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 1 b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complied with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. B. The Riverside County General Plan, as amended by the Southwest Area Community Plan, (hereinafter "SWAP") was adopted prior to the incorporation of Temecula as the General Plan for the southwest portion of Riverside County, including the area now within the boundaries of the City. At this time, the City has adopted SWAP as its General Plan guidelines while the City is proceeding in a timely fashion with the preparation of its General Plan. C. The proposed Time Extension is consistent with the SWAP and meets the requirements set forth in Section 65360 of the Government Code, to wit: (1) The City is proceeding in a timely fashion with a preparation of the general plan. (2) The Planning Commission finds, in approving projects and taking other actions, including the issuance of building permits, pursuant to this title, each of the following: a) There is reasonable probability that the Time Extension proposed will be consistent with the general plan proposal being considered or studied or which will be studied within a reasonable time. b) There is little or no probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future adopted general plan if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan. c) The proposed use or action complies with all other applicable requirements of state law and local ordinances. D. (1) Pursuant to Section 18.30(c), noTime Extension may be approved unless the following findings can be made: STAFFRPT\TPM;Z3335 2 a) The proposed use must conform to all the General Plan requirements and with all applicable requirements of state law and City ordinances. b) The proposed subdivision does not affect the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. ( 2 ) The Planning Commission, in approving the proposed Time Extension, makes the following findings, to wit: a) There is a reasonable probability that Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 will be consistent with the City's future Ceneral Plan, which will be completed in a reasonable time and in accordance with State law, due to the fact that the project is consistent with existing site development standards in that it proposes articulated design features and site amenities commensurate with existing and anticipated commercial development standards. b) There is not a likely probability of substantial detriment to or interference with the future and adopted general plan, if the proposed use or action is ultimately inconsistent with the plan, due to the fact that the project is ~n conformance with existing and anticipated land use and design guidelines standards. c) The proposed use or action complies with state planning and zoning laws, due to the fact that the proposed use conforms with those uses listed as "allowed" within the project site's existing C-P-S { Scenic Highway Commercial) land use designation. d) The site is suitable to accommodate the proposed land use in terms of the size and shape of the lot configuration, circulation patterns, access, and density, due to the fact that; adequate area is provided for all proposed facility structures; adequate landscaping will be provided along the project's public and private frontages; and the internal circulation plan should not create traffic conflicts as design provisions will be STAFFRPT\TPM23335 3 e) f) g) h) i) in conformance with adopted City standards. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the public health or welfare, due to the fact that the conditions stated in the approval are based on mitigation measures necessary to reduce or eliminate potential adverse impacts of the project. Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 is compatible with surrounding land uses. The density creates a compatible physical relationship with adjoining properties, due to the fact that the proposal is similar in compatibility with surrounding land uses; and has adequate area in order to provide for siting of proposed development. The proposal will not have an adverse effect on surrounding property because it does not represent a significant change to the present or planned land use of the area, due to the fact that the proposed project is consistent with the current zoning of the subject site ( C-P-S; Scenic Highway Commercial ) and also consistent with the adopted Southwest Area Community Plan (SWAP) designation of Commercial. The project, as designed and conditioned, will not adversely affect the built or natural environment as determined in the Negative Declaration adopted by the County for the project, due to the fact that impact mitigation is realized by conformance with the project's Conditions of Approval. The project has acceptable access to a dedicated right-of-way which is open to, and useable by, vehicular traffic, due to the fact that the project will propose independent access points from Winchester Road and Possibly Ynez Road which have been determined to be adequate by the City Engineer. STAFFRPT\TPM23335 The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not in conflict with easements for access through or use of the property within the proposed projects, due to the fact that this is clearly represented in the site plan and the project analysis. k) That said findings are supported by minutes, maps, exhibits and environmental documents associated with these applicants and herein incorporated by reference, due to the fact that they are referenced in the attached Staff Report Exhibits, Environmental Assessment, and Conditions of Approval. E. As conditioned pursuant to SECT ION 2, the Time Extension proposed conforms to the logical development of its proposed site, and ~s compatible with the present and future development of the surrounding property. SECTION 2. Environmental Compliance. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby determines that the previous environmental determination (Adoption of Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment No. 32718) still applies to said Parcel Map (Extension of Time). SECTION 3. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby approves The First Extension of Time for Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 for a six (6) parcel Commercial Subdivision of 10.18 located north of junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road and known as AssessorSs Parcel No. 910-011-031 Portion subject to the following conditions: A. Exhibit A, attached hereto. Resolution. SECTION ~ The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of February, 1991. DENNIS CHINIAEFF CHAIRMAN STAFFRPT\TPM23335 5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 25th day of February. 1991 by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS STAFFRPT\TPM23335 6 CITY OF TEMECULA PP M 2356 10 621 23335 2R PP2 VICINITY MAP CASE NO. P.C. DATE ~--'~'~"-~'/ CITY OF TEMECULA ~ A- t-iO I-P CZ 4078 M-SC~ CZ4348 \ \ \ / ~,~Z 4077 077 ~, M-SC /M-SC CZ 4607 CZ R R P-S ~ <t566 ZONE MAP CASE NO. ~,,,.'/' P.C. DATE ~'-~'--?/ CITY OF TEMECULA LI ,:,",z...., · SWAP MAP CASE NO. P.C. DATE Tentative Parcel County_ of' Rl~r$1de~ WincheSter Map No. 23335" State of California Meadows -" ,~ EX..~r / ATTACHMENT IV CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO.: Tentative Parcel Map No. 23335 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. Fee Habitat Conservation Plan (K-Rat) Parks and Recreation (Quimby) Public Facility ( Traffic Mitigation ) Public Facility (Traffic Signal Mitigation) Public Facility (Library) Fire Protection Flood Control (ADP) Condition of Approval Condition No. I N/A Condition No. 16 Condition No. 12 N/A Letter Dated 6-13-88 Letter Dated 6-22-88 STAFFRPT\TPM23335 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 25, 1991 10. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 23335 10.1 Proposal for first extension of time. Project located North of Junction of Winchester Road and Ynez Road. JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that the decision by the Commission would be a recommendation to the City Council. STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report. CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:15 P.M. GREG ERICKSON, Bedford Properties, Single Oak Drive, Temecula, representing the applicant, gave a brief presentation on what type of tenants are proposed for this project. He also discussed access of the project. Mr. Erickson presented Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh a letter from Bedford Properties op~gsing Condition of Approval No. 16. /~.w-~.~C,.~?' "COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing at 8:20 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91-(next) recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map 23335 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval as presented by staff. 11. 11.1 PARCEL MAP 26664 Park GARY off for a 21 parcel Planned Industri~ on the Site of previously Plot Plan at the southeasterly of Business and Rancho Way. L advised that this would be continued 12. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 91-1 12.1 Proposal to provid, Plan approvals Permits city :ension Procedure for Plot Conditional Use STEVE provided the staff COMM HOAGLAND moved to Adopt Reso2 1 recommending to the City Council approval inance Amendment 91-1 providing an Extension of PCMIN2 191 -12- 2/26/91 ITEM NO. 18 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ~ FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECUIA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL JOHN E. CAVANAUGH, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY MARCH 18, 1991 MARCH 26, 1991 ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and approve the first reading of the following ordinance granting an electricity franchise to Southern California Edison Company: I. "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, UPON, OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA." DISCUSSION: At the February 26, 1991 meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-25 declaring the City Council's intention to grant an electric franchise to Southern California Edison Company. (A copy of the previous agenda report and resolution of intent is attached hereto as Exhibit "A") In accordance with state law, a public hearing must be held between twenty (20) and sixty (60) days after adoption of the resolution of intent. At the time of the public hearing, the Council may grant Edison a franchise by adoption of the attached ordinance. AQenda Reoort - Electricity Franchise - So, Calif. Edison Co. Pao~ 2 A TTA CHMENTS: Copy of Agenda Report dated February 19, 1991 and Resolution Of Intent To Grant An Electricity Franchise to Southern California Edison Company. Ordinance No. 91-~ granting an electricity franchise to Southern California Edison Company. FISCAL IMPACT: Increased franchise fees for the City of Temecula. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA GRANTING TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A FRANCHISE TO USE AND TO CONSTRUCT AND USE, FOR TRANSMITTING AND DISTRIBUTING ELECTRICITY FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES, POLES, WIRES, CONDUITS AND APPURTENANCES, INCLUDING COMMUNICATION CIRCUITS NECESSARY OR PROPER THEREFOR, IN, ALONG, ACROSS, Ut~N, OVER AND UNDER THE PUBLIC STREETS, WAYS, ALLEYS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Whenever in this Ordinance the words or phrases defined in this section are used, it is intended that they shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the following definitions unless, in the given instance, the context wherein they are used shall clearly import a different meaning: A. The word "grantee" shall mean Southern California Edison Company and its lawful successors or assigns; B. The word "City" shall mean the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation of the State of California, in its present incorporated form or in any later reorganized, consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form; C. The word "streets" shall mean the public streets, ways, alleys and places as the same now or may hereafter exist within the City; D. · The phrase "poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances" shall mean poles, towers, supports, wires, conductors cables, guys, stubs, platforms, crossarms, braces, transformers, insulators, conduits, ducts, vaults, manholes, meters, cut-outs, switches, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, appurtenances and any other property located or to be located in, along, across, upon, over or under the streets of the City, and used or useful, direcfiy or indirecfiy for the purpose of transmitting or distributing electricity; E. The phrase "construct and use" shall mean to lay, construct, excavate, encroach, erect, install, operate' maintain, use, repair, replace, relocate, or remove; F. The word "franchise" shall mean and include any authorization granted hereunder in terms of a franchise, privilege, permit, license or otherwise to construct and use poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances, including communication circuits, for transmitting and distributing electricity for any and all purposes in, along, across, upon, over, and under streets within the City. Any authorization, in whatever terms granted, shall be in lieu of any business license tax or permit based upon gross receipts or number of employees, but no other license, tax or permit. SECTION 2. The franchise to use and to construct and use, for transmitting and distributing electricity for any and all purposes, poles, wires, conduits and appurte- nances, including communication circuits, necessary or proper therefor, in, along, across, upon, over and under the streets within the City of Temecula, is hereby granted to Southern California Edison Company, its lawful successors and assigns, under and in accordance with the provisions of the Franchise Act of 1937. SECTION 3. Said franchise shall be indeterminate, that is to say, said franchise shall endure in full force and effect until, with the consent of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, the same shall be voluntarily surrendered or abandoned by the grantee, or until the State or some municipal or public corporation thereunder duly authorized by law shall purchase by voluntary agreement or shall condemn and take under the power of eminent domain, all property actually used and useful in the exercise of said franchise and situate within the territorial limits of the state, municipal or public corporation purchasing or condemning such property, or until said franchise shall be forfeited for noncompliance with its terms by the grantee. SECTION 4. The grantee of said franchise, during the life thereof, shall pay to the City two percent (2%) of the gross annual receipts of said grantee arising from the use, operation or possession of said franchise; provided, however, that such payment shall in no event be less than one percent (1%) of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the sale of electricity within the limits of the City. It is understood that any administrative, legislative, or judicial modification of said franchise fee or the basis of calculating said fee pursuant to Public Utilities Code, Article 2, Section 6231(c) shall be cause for review and renegotiation of only the amount of this franchise fee at any time within the term of this franchise. SECTION $. A. On or before the 15th day of March of each calendar year during the term of this franchise and forty-five (45) days after the expiration of the term of this franchise, grantee shall file with the City Clerk of the City, the original, and with the Finance Officer of the City, one copy of a statement showing the gross receipts during the preceding calendar year or fractional calendar year. B. On or before the 31st day of March, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer the money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City upon the basis of the data set forth in said statement. C. Thereafter, no later than the 31st day of the end of each quarter Oune, September, and December) of the City fiscal year during the term of this franchise, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer one-fourth (1/4) of the money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City upon the basis of the data set forth in the statement required by Section 5(a) hereof. By this method of payment, it is contemplated and understood that grantee is in effect paying the money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City under this subsection on the basis of gross receipts for the preceding calendar year and that an adjustment shall be made, as more fully set forth in Section 5(d) hereof. D. On or before the 31st day of March, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer, or receive as a refund from the City, as the case may be, a sum of money equal to the difference between the sum of the payments of money made in accordance with Section 5(c) hereof and the annual payment of money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City upon the basis of the data set forth in said statement. E. In the event grantee fails to make any of the payments provided for in this franchise on or before the dates due as herein provided, grantee shall pay as additional consideration both of the following amounts: 1). A sum of money equal to two percent (2%) of the amount due. This amount is required in order to defray those additional expenses and costs incurred by City by reason of the delinquent payment including, but not limited to, the cost of administering, accounting and collecting said delinquent payment and the cost to City of postponing services and projects necessitated by the delay in receiving revenue. 2). A sum of money equal to one percent (1%) of the amount due per month as interest and for loss of use of the money due. SECTION 6. The City Treasurer, or any qualified person designated by the City, at any reasonable time during regular business hours, may make examination at grantee's office or offices, of its books and records, germane to and for the purpose of verifying the data set forth in the statement required by Section 5(a) hereof. All books and records subject to examination by the City Treasurer, or qualified person designated by the City, shall be kept within the grantee's office in the County of Los Angeles. In the event that it becomes necessary for said City Treasurer, or other representative designated by the City, to make such examination at any place other than within said County, then, in that event, all increased costs and expenses to the City necessary or incident to such examination and resulting from such books and records not being available within said County, shall be paid to the City by grantee on demand. SECTION 7. A. Grantee shall remove or relocate without expense to the City any facilities installed, used, and maintained under the franchise if and when made necessary by any lawful change of grade, alignment, or width of any public street, way, alley, or place, including the construction of any subway or viaduct by the City. B. The term "City" as used in this section shall mean the same as the term "municipality" contained in Section 6297 of the Public Utilities Code. C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City shall be afforded the benefit of all legal interpretations in nature and in scope of the term "municipalityM whenever referenced in the Franchise Act of 1937 as cited in Chapter 2, Sections 6201 et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. D. When such removal or relocation is required, Grantee shall begin physical field work on the removal or relocation within a reasonable time after written notice from the City Manager, or his designee. If despite its best efforts, Grantee is unable to begin removal or relocation within a reasonable time, Grantee shall give written notice to the City Manager of the reason or reasons for the delay and the date removal or relocation is expected to begin. Grantee shall proceed promptly to complete such required work. SECTION 8. Grantee of the franchise granted hereby shall indemnify, save, defend and hold harmless the City and any duly established City redevelopment agency and the respective officers and employees thereof from all liability for damages proximately resulting from any operations under the franchise. SECTION 9. Grantee shall pay to City on demand the cost of all repairs to City property made necessary by any of the operations of grantee under the franchise granted hereby, provided however that grantee may make repairs to streets, sidewalks, curbs and gutters itself at its own cost in accordance with City specifications if the same can be done without undue inconvenience to the public use of the streets. SECTION 10. This franchise is granted upon each and every condition herein contained, and shall be strictly construed against grantee. Nothing shall pass by the franchise granted hereby to grantee unless it be granted in plain and unambiguous terms. Each of said conditions is a material and essential condition to the granting of the franchise. If grantee shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any of the conditions of the franchise granted hereby, and if such failure, neglect or refusal shall continue for more than thirty (30) days after written demand by the City Manager for compliance therewith, then City, by the City Council, in addition to all rights, and remedies allowed by law, thereupon may terminate the right, privilege and franchise granted in and by this Ordinance, and all the rights, privileges and the franchise of grantee granted hereby shall thereupon be at an end. Thereupon and immediately, grantee shall surrender all rights and privileges in and to the franchise granted hereby. No provision herein made for the purpose of securing the enforcement of the terms and conditions of the franchise granted hereby shall be deemed an exclusive remedy or to afford the exclusive procedure for the enforcement of said terms and conditions, but the remedies and procedure outlines herein or provided, including forfeiture, shall be deemed to be cumulative. SECTION 11. This franchise is granted in lieu of all other rights and electric franchises owned by and/or granted to Grantee within the limits of the City, as said limits now or may hereafter exist, except any franchise derived under Section 19, Article XI, of the Constitution, as that section existed prior to the amendment thereof adopted October 10, 1911, and the acceptance of this franchise shall operate as an abandonment and extinguishment of all such rights and franchises within the limits of the City, as such limits now or may hereafter exist. When Grantee's acceptance is filed, it shall constitute a continuing agreement of Grantee that if and when the City shall thereafter annex, or consolidate with, additional territory, any and all similar rights and franchises owned by and/or granted to Grantee in such area annexed to, or consolidated with, the City shall likewise be deemed to be abandoned and extinguished. SECTION 12. Grantee shall file with the City Council, within thirty (30) days after any sale, transfer, assignment, or lease of the franchise or any part thereof, or any of the rights or privileges granted thereby, written evidence of the transaction certified to by the grantee or its duly authorized officers. SECTION 13. Nothing in this Ordinance or in the franchise granted hereby shall be construed as in any way impairing City's rights to acquire property of Grantee through the exercise of City's power of eminent domain or through voluntary agreement between City and Grantee. SECTION 14. Grantee shall not sell, transfer, assign or lease this franchise or the rights and privileges granted hereby without filing written evidence of any such sale, transfer, assignment or lease, as provided by Public Unilities Code Section 6298. SECTION 15. The grantee of this franchise shall pay to the City a sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for all publication expenses incurred by it in connection with the granting of this franchise; said payment to be made within thirty (30) days after the City shall have furnished said grantee with a written statement of such expenses. SECTION 16. The franchise granted hereby shall not become effective until written acceptance thereof shall have been filed by the grantee with the City Clerk of the City. SECTION 17. SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 18. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 19. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty days after its passage. A summary of this Ordinance shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City at least five (5) days prior to the City Council meeting at which the proposed Ordinance is to be adopted. A certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance shall be posted at City Hall. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of the Ordinance, the summary with the names of those City Council members voting for and against the Ordinance shall be published again, and the City Clerk shall post a certified copy of the full text of such adopted Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of ,1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) S$. I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 91-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1991, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field City Attorney APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL FROM: JOHN E. CAVANAUGH, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1991 SUBJECT: ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE -- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached Resolution of Intent to grant an electricity franchise to Southern California Edison Company. DISCUSSION: We have completed negotiations with Southern California Edison Company ("Edison") for an electricity franchise within the City of Temecula. The authority for the proposed franchise is the Franchise Act of 1937, set forth in Sections 6201, et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. Edison is currently operating its utility within the City under a franchise granted by the County of Riverside pursuant to the Broughton Act, set forth in Section 6001, et seq. of the Public Utilities Code. The 1937 Act imposes certain minimum duties and liabilities upon the grantee of a franchise. These duties and liabilities include: Reimbursement for publication expenses incurred by the city in granting the franchise (P.U.C. §6293); Payment of the cost of repairs to public property damaged by any of grantee's operations under the franchise (P.U.C. §6295); 3. Indemnification of the city (P.U.C. §6296); Removal and relocation of facilities by grantee when made necessary by any lawful change of grade, alignment or width of any public street or right of way (P.U.C. §6297); and Filing of an annual statement setting forth the total gross receipts of the grantee from the sale of electricity (P.U.C. §6299). After negotiations with Edison, Edison has agreed to the following additional franchise provisions: Agenda Report - Electricity Franchise February 26, 1991 Page 2 Quarterly, rather than annual payments of the franchise fee. The quarterly payments are based upon the gross receipts collected the preceding year. This provision, which gives the City the benefit of the interest which can be earned on the franchise fees paid, is a significant concession on Edison's part since, the bulk of Edison's franchise fees are paid annually. 2. A penalty for any delinquent payments required by the franchise agreement; The right of City officials to audit Edison's books and records to ensure accurate payment of the franchise fees; ,. Indemnification and defense of not only the City but also any future redevelopment agency. Retroactive effect of the franchise agreement, including the basis for calculating the franchise fee to December 1, 1989. The proposed Edison franchise is of an indeterminate term. Thus, the franchise continues in effect until forfeited by Edison, either expressly or by failing to take some action required by the agreement, or until the State or the City exercises its power of eminent domain and condemns Edison's facilities. In order to begin consideration of the proposed Edison franchise, the Council must adopt a Resolution of Intent to grant a franchise. This Resolution must state the character of the franchise to be granted and provide notice of the place and for a public hearing on the matter. A Resolution of Intent to grant Edison a franchise is attached. The public hearing must be held between twenty (20) and sixty (60) days after adoption of the Resolution of Intent. After the public hearing, the Council may grant Edison a franchise by adoption of an Ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: No immediate impact as a result of the adoption of the Resolution of Intent, however, eventual adoption of an Ordinance granting a franchise will result in increased franchise fees for the City· A TTA CHMENTS: Resolution of Intent to grant an electricity franchise to Southern California Edison Company. RESOLUTION NO. 91-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DECLARING THE CITY COUNCIL'S INTENTION TO GRANT AN ELECTRIC FRANCHISE TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY WHEREAS, Southern California Edison Company, a California corporation, has f'ded with the City Council of the City of Temecula an application requesting that a franchise be granted to it of the character and for the purposes mentioned in the notice hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, in the opinion of the City Council the public good requires that said franchise be granted; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA. DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to grant said franchise to Southern California Edison Company, that hearing of objections to the granting thereof will be held at the time and place specified in the notice hereinafter set forth, which the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish at least once within fifteen (15) days after the passage of this resolution in the Californian, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Temecula, and that said notice shall be in the following words and figures: "NOTICE OF INTENTION TO GRANT FRANCHISE NOTICE IS I-lF~l~lgy GIVEN that Southern California Edison Company, a California corporation, has filed its application with the City Council of the City of Temecula req~:_u~ting that the City Council grant to it a franchise for an indeterminate period, pursuant to the Franchise Act of 1937, to construct, install, maintain and use poles, wires, conduits and appurtenances, including communication circuits necessary or proper therefore, under, along, across and upon the public highways and streets within the City for transmitting and distributing electricity to the public for any and all purposes. If said franchise shall be granted to it, Southern California Edison Company, its successors and assigns, hereinafter designated grantee, shall during the life thereof pay to the City two (2 %) percent of the gross annual receipts of said grantee arising from the use, opera- tion or possession of said franchise; provided, however, that such payment shall in no event be less than one (1%) percent of the gross annual receipts derived by grantee from the sale of electricity within the limits of the City. Resolution 91-25 Page 2 Said percentages will be paid as follows: (a) On or before the 15th day of March of each calendar year during the term of this franchise and forty-five (45) days after the expiration of the term of this franchise, grantee shall file with the City Clerk of the City, the original, and with the Auditor of City, one copy of a statement showing the gross receipts during the preceding calendar year or fractional calendar year. Co) On or before the 31st day of March, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer the money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City upon the basis of the data set forth in said statement. (c) Thereafter, no later than the 31st day of the end of each quarter (June, September and December) of the City's fiscal year during the term of this franchise, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer one-fourth (1/4) of the money herein required to be paid by grantee to the City upon the basis of the data set forth in the statement required by Subsection (a) herein. By- this method of payment, it is contemplated and understood that grantee is in effect paying the money herein required to be paid by Grantee to the City under this subsection on the basis of gross receipts for the preceding calendar year and that an adjustment shall be made, as more fully set forth in Subsection (d) herein. (d) On or before the 31st day of March, grantee shall pay to the City Treasurer, or receive as a refund from the City, as the case may be, a sum of money equal to the difference between the sum of the payments of money made in accordance with Subsection (¢) herein and the annual payment of money herein required to be paid by grantee to City upon the basis of the data set forth in said statement. NOTICE IS HEI~ERY FURTI-IER GIVEN that any and all persons having any objections to the granting of said franchise may appear before the City Council at the Temporary Council Chambers, located at 27475 Commerce Center Drive, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., on Tuesday, the 26th day of March, 1991, and be heard thereon; and NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that at any time not later than the hour so set for hearing objections, any person interested may make written protest stating objections against the granting of said franchise, which protest must be signed by the protestant and delivered to the City Clerk, and the City Council will, at the time set for hearing said objections, proceed to hear and pass upon all protests so made. Resolution No. 91-25 Page 3 For further particulars reference is hereby made to said appn ation on me in the office of the City Clerk, and also to Resolution No. 91-25, adopted on the 26th day of February, 1991, declaring the City Council's intention to grant said franchise. Dated: , 1991 By order of the City Council of the City of Temecula. City Clerk of the City of Temecula SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of February, 1991. Ronald I. Parks, Mayor ATTEST S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERS[DE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 26th day of, 1991 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: 4 COUNCH, MEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Mufioz, Parks NOES: 0 COUNCK.MEMBERS: None ABS~: 1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Moore ]une~8'. Greek, City Clerk 2/1~m~91-2S 3 ITEM NO. 19 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council City Attorney March 26, 1991 Bus Shelters - Temecula Valley Transit PREPARED B~ City Clerk June Greek RECOMMENDATION: 1991. That this matter be continued to the meeting of April 9, BACKGROUND: The City Manager, City Attorney and the applicant Mr. Tom Mindeola met on Tuesday, March 19, 1991 to finalize the necessary agreements regarding the Bus Shelter program and the establishment of bus service. All parties concurred that additional time is needed to complete the agreements and therefore request that this matter be continued until the City Council meeting of April 9, 1991. jsg ITEM NO. 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Mary Jane Henry, Finance Officer March 26, 1991 Community Service Funding Criteria RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review and advise staff regarding the criteria for the Community Service Funding Application process for the Fiscal Year 1991-92. DISCUSSION: In accordance with your request we have accumulated the funding criteria from eight (8) organizations who fund various community programs. This criteria is listed on Exhibit "A". In addition, Exhibit "B" is the General Policy and Funding Philosophy from the City of Claremont. It is included for comment as it seems to state Council's position taken during the Council meeting of January 8, 1991. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Attachment "A" - Criteria List Attachment "B" - General Policy and Funding Philosophy, City of Claremont Attachment "C" - Fiscal Year 1990-1991 Community Service Funding Criteria COMMUNITY SERVICE FUNDING CRITERIA Attachment "A" ., 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. Non-profit organization Evidence of satisfactory service provided to City's citizens Does not discriminate based on race, color, creed, nationality, sex, marital status, disability, religion, or political affiliation Does not require attendance or participation in any political, religious or social activity Provides financial statements prepared in accord with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) to demonstrate sound financial management Provides budget for fiscal year of request demonstrating cost-effectiveness Does organization have other funding sources (i.e. minimum of 20% funding from non-City sources) Does request increase service levels Does not duplicate service of other organization Provides evidence of effective response to a documented need Provides a high level of access to services offered Possesses ongoing program evaluation tools Demonstrates fiscal and administrative capacity to support program Exhibits a high level of community support through its ability to retain a broad based Board of Directors Bylaws must define organization's purpose and functions, organization and duties Board of Directors meets at least quarterly, establishes and enforces policy, represents community Maintains current written personnel policies and procedures and a written job description for each staff position Requested amount is reasonable in comparison to services and number of City residents served Requested amount is not to include amount to fund debt service Requested amount is not to include amount to fund fellowships Attachment "B" City of Claremont Process and Criteria for Evaluating Requests for Community Based Organizations for City Funding Purpose To establish a process and evaluation criteria for funding requests received by the city from community based organizations (CBO'S) throughout the year. General Policy The City receives requests throughout the year for financial assistance from various organizations which provide a variety of services within the community. It is the City's policy to channel such requests through the normal City budget process, thereby ensuring that all requests are evaluated equitably and consistently; to enter into agreements for specific measurable services; and, to ensure that recipients are held accountable for providing the agreed upon services within the appropriate time frame. Fundim3 Philosoohv Requests for funding received from CBOs will be considered during the regular budget process along with City department requests for funding. Due to limited resources, not all requests received can be funded. Therefore, it is not the city council's intention to fund each CBO request received; but rather, to evaluate each proposal and, based on available funds, provide money and other forms of financial assistance to those organizations which most effectively serve the needs and improve the well-being of the residents of Claremont. Special consideration will be given to proposals which replace or enhance services the city is responsible for providing. The City Council encourages a goal of self-sufficiency for all local CBO's. The council supports providing seed money to new programs that will provide needed services to the community, but discourages an over-reliance on city financial assistance to maintain such programs on an on-going basis. Therefore, all CBO's requesting funding from the city should continue efforts to develop stable private funding sources. Attachment "C" CITY OF TEMECULA Community Services Funding Program The City of Temecula, in its Fiscal Year 1990-1991 budget, has allocated $125,000 to fund community service programs within the community. ELIGIBILITY Applications are accepted from tax exempt, nonprofit organizations and individuals for the funding of projects which occur during the fiscal year, excluding normal operating expenses and deficit funding. Services should benefit the City of Temecula. A written report should be presented to the City Council thirty days after the completion of the project. In the case of an extended project, interim reports may be required. DEADLINES November 16, 1990 - Applications available from the City of Temecula. November 30, 1990 - Deadline for application submittal for second funding period. Award recipients will be announced in December, 1990. CRITERIA In making its recommendations to the City Council for funding, a Community Service Committee will consider the following criteria: a. Community service excellence b. Size and make-up community service organization c. Relevance to the City's community service interests d. Public and critic reaction to the group e. Quality of fiscal management f. Longevity in the City of Temecula g. Percentage of request to organization's annual budget h. Community leadership and support Applicants will be notified of date, time and location for a five (5) minute presentation to the Committee and answer questions the Committee may have. Thank you for participating in the City of Temecula's Community Service Funding Program. ITEM NO. 21 APPROVAL =INANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: MEETING DATE SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL SCOTT F. FIELD, CITY ATTORNEY MARCH 5, 1991 MARCH 12, 1991 ADOPTION OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the City Council approve the first reading of the Attached Ordinance No. 91-_ adopting the County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan. DISCUSSION: Prior to the incorporation to the City of Temecula, the County of Riverside through its Board of Supervisors duly adopted a Redevelopment plan, known as the "County of Redevelopment Plan 1-1980." All of the territory included within the County Redevelopment Plan is now within the boundaries of the City of Temecula; therefore, it is necessary to transfer the territorial jurisdiction of the County Redevelopment Agency to the City Redevelopment Agency. Health and Safety Code Sections 33214-33216 set out rules for such transfer authority when all or part of a plan area has been included within the boundaries of a city, by incorporation or annexation, subsequent to the adoption of the Plan by the County. Since all of the territory within the project area is to be transferred, Section 33215 is most applicable and I have set forth the steps to be taken by the City below. Section 33215 provides that if all of the territory included within a County plan is subsequently included within the boundaries of the City, the territorial jurisdiction of the County agency over all of the territory in that project area may be transferred from the County Agency to the City Agency. In conducting the transfer the City must adopt, or have adopted, both the following ordinances: An Ordinance pursuant to Section 33101 declaring the need for an agency to function in the City; and Aaenda Reoort - Adootion of Redevelooment Plan March 12. 1991 Pa~e 2 e An Ordinance adopting the same Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area that was previously adopted by the Board of Supervisors. The effective date of the transfer of territorial jurisdiction is the first day of the fiscal year which begins following the effective date of the latter enacted ordinances described above. After the transfer the following applies: The City Agency has all of the rights, powers and duties to implement the Plan; and, e The debts and any other obligations of the County Agency in connection with the Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area are assumed by the City Agency; and, For purposes of this Section including 33670 (relating to division of taxes), the Redevelopment Plan in considered to have been adopted by the City Council on the date the Redevelopment Plan was originally adopted by the Board of Supervisors. A TTA CHMENTS: FISCAL IMPACT: Ordinance No. 91-_ None at this time. ORDINANCE NO. 91- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare, as follows: (a) That the County of Riverside, prior to the incorporation of the City of Temecula, duly adopted a redevelopment plan, known as the "County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan 1-1988"; and, Co) That subsequent to the enactment of that redevelopment plan, the City of Temecula was incorporated; and, (c) That all of the territory to which the redevelopment plan applies is now included within the corporate boundaries of the City of Temecula; and, (d) That it is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to adopt the said redevelopment plan pursuant to the authority set forth in Section 33215 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California, and other applicable law; and, (e) That the City Council of the City of Temecula has determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity require the enactment of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. That that certain redevelopment plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside on July 12, 1988, by Ordinance No. 658, entitled "County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988" be, and hereby is, adopted by this City Council. A certified true and correct copy of the County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988, as enacted by Ordinance No. 658 of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside, and as adopted by this Ordinance, is on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City. SECTION 3. The effective date of the transfer of territorial jurisdiction with respect to the County of Riverside Redevelopment Plan No. 1-1988, shall be July 1, 1991. SECTION 4. That the City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and cause the same to be published in the manner prescribed by law. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ,1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) CITY OF TEMECULA ) SS. I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 91- was regularly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of , 1991. That thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the ~ day of , 19w, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott F. Field, City Attorney 2\ORD8\17 2 ITEM NO. 22 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY ,'~,~, ;(~-~ FINANCE OFFICE~~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT.' CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council Mark J. Ochenduszko, Assistant City Manager March 19, 1991 Street Maintenance Repair and Striping Program RECOMMENDA T/ON: It is recommended that the City Council receive this report regarding Street Maintenance Repair and Striping within the City of Temecula. No further action is required at this time. STAFF REPORT: At the meeting of March 12, 1991, Councilmember Munoz advised staff of concerns related to street maintenance, and asked that the issue be reviewed and improved. Staff has examined the city's current mechanisms for maintaining streets and making street repairs, and found that the current system requires modification. Presently, the City of Temecula does not have a street inspection program. For this reason, street repair requirements are only identified when staff members or the public notice an area requiring repair and advise engineering staff. Often, citizens notify Councilmembers directly of street repair requirements. Sufficient monies exist from that which was budgeted for street maintenance services to contract for street inspections. For this reason, Willdan and Associates has been asked to provide this service (city-wide) immediately, and thereafter, on a quarterly basis. The current street maintenance contract with the County of Riverside is a standard agreement which provides that "...each service shall be performed at the times and under circumstances which do not interfere with the performance of regular County operations." This language places Temecula's needs in a secondary position to County in-house work orders. A meeting with Frank Sherkovv, the new County Transportation Director, has revealed that the County would like to continue providing street maintenance, traffic safety, and general services to Temecula. Mr. Sherkow is interested in renewing our agreement for the next fiscal year. He has agreed to staff's recommendation that the current contract be rewritten so that Temecula street maintenance needs be performed on a priority basis, and that performance standards be incorporated into a new agreement. Mr. Sherkovv will be present at the March 26, 1991 City Council meeting to address this matter. No council action is required at this time. Staff will initiate work orders to ensure that current street maintenance repair and striping needs are remedied, implement an inspection program, and develop a revised agreement with the County. The revised agreement for Fiscal Year 1991-92 will be placed on the April 9, 1991 City Council agenda for consideration.\ FISCAL IMPACT.' The costs associated with street maintenance activities have been budgeted for this fiscal year and are sufficient. For this reason, no additional appropriation is required. CC: D. Stewart F. Sherkow, County Transportation Department C:\MJO\WP\STRTMNTN.DOC ITEM NO. 23 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICE~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council City Manager March 26, 1991 Flag Program Request- Old Town Temecula Merchants Association RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize the sum of $2,000, from the discretionary fund, to cover the cost of brackets and American flags. BACKGROUND: Attached, you will find a letter addressed to the City Council from Bonnie Reed, President of the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association. It is their request that the City support the purchase of brackets and American Flags which will be mounted on light standards in the Old Town area. These brackets would also accommodate flags for various events. It is my recommendation that the City support the initial expenditure of $2,000 which will provide brackets and enough funding to purchase American flags. Additional flags and banners should be the responsibility of the local merchant's promotional program, thereby clearly separating the City from a commercial endeavor. I support the initial expenditure because it provides one-time seed money to the Old Town Merchants Association which they then can add to and expand as the need arises and the funds become available. FISCAL IMPACT.. Unencumbered funds are available in the amount of $2,000 in the City Council Social Services discretionary account number 100-5267. DFD:jsg December 6, 1990 City of Temecula City Council Dear Council Members: The Old Town Temecula Merchants Association proposes that the City of Temecula join it in an attempt to "Flag" the old town for special events, the holiday seasons, and idenitity. The flagging would serve the foil;wing purposes. Preserve Old Town as a special historical place. 2. Call attention to city wide festivals.. 3. Promote special events. 4. Celebrate the seasons 1.e. Christmas. 0 Promote city pride and identity. Prevent typical downtown deteriation as shopping malls pull buying traffic away from Old Town. It is our belief that we must begin to act if we are to preserve the historical integrity and viable shopping as a tourist center for the city of Temecula. In serving the above purposes, tax revenue from sales in the businesses, specialty shops, and motels will enhance the city's income. We therefore propose that the Chambeo of Commerce pay for Baloon and Wine flags and other Chamber events, OTTNA pay for it's special event flags, The TTA pay for Tractor Race flags and so on. We propose that the City pay for flags with the City logo plus (4th of July, Christmas, and other events which the city may sponsor). In addition, we propose that the City pay for brackets on city light standards. There are 36 light standards in Old Town. OTT~ agrees to install and de-install the flags for each event and season,and to ~ro¥ide storage. OTTN~A has liability insurance to cover any roo±em re±amrng to it's part of this agreement. A budget and timetable is included for your information. us in this city Pride Venture. Please join Sincerely, Bonnie Reed, President TIMETABLE Dec ember January February March April ~lay Letter to City Consideration by City, committee discussion City Approval Bids for bracket manufacture, Bids for flag manuf ac ture Installation of brackets WESTERN DAYS FESTIVAL BA~00N AND WINE FESTIVAL BUDGET BRACKETS 36 @ 35..00 ~aBOR FOR ABOVE TO BE DETERMINED 4th of JULY FLAGS CHRI STNAS FLAGS CITY LOGO FLAGS (BASIC FLAG PLUS SILK SCREEN EXPENSE) 1000.00 1260.00 771.12 743.40 SPEEDY Sign,A, Rama,USA 28822 FRONT ST., SUITE 110, TEMECULA, CA 92390 (714) 694-6388 FAX (714) 694-6389 QUOTATION FORM DATE 10-19-90 BECKER FINE ART TO WE ARE PLEASED TO QUOTE AS FOLLOWS F O B TERMS QUANTITY DESCRIPTION YOUR INQUIRY ESTIMATED SHIPPING DATE PRICE AMOUNT 36 4' x 2' NYlon flags red, white, blue stripes $21 .42 $771.12 Includes pocket at top and grommet on bottom-side 36 4' x 2' Nylon flags green & red stripes $20.65 $743.40 Includes pocket at top and grommet on bottom-side approximately 5 working days Plus tax If you wish to proceed in ordering, please indicate your approval by signing & returning one (l) copy of tiffs quotation along with a deposit of 50%. ABOVE PRICES GOOD FOR ~ 0 DAYS Approved: Date: SIGNATURE SOLD BY CASH C.O.D. I CHARGE [ ON ACCT. MDSE. RETD. PAID O~JT QTY. DESCRIPTION PRICE AMOUNT I I I __'-'~ 7 ......7 ::'--: ............' TAX J ~E~E~VEO ~Y TOTAL All claims and returned goods ~'r ~ST be .ccompanied by this bilL ,_~. ~:tf~ December 6,1990 Chamber of Commerce 40945 County Center Drive Ste. C Temecula, Ca, 92390 Dear Chamber Members, O.TTS~A would like to solicite your support for the "Flagging" of Old Town. As you can see from the enclosed proposal which we have made to the City, your organization could benefit from this project. Please write a letter of support to your city council members if you wish to join us and consider which flags you may wish to purchase. All participation must be coordinated for uniform size and detail. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, December 6, 1990 Temecula Town Association 28816 Pujol Temecula, Ca. 92390 Dear Town Association Members, OTTNA would like to solicite your support for the ?Flagging" of Old Town. As you can see from the enclosed proposal which we have made to the city, your organization could benefit from this project. Please write a letter of support to your city council members if you wish to join us and consider which flags you may wish to pumchase. All participation must be coordinated for uniform size and detail. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Bonnie Reed, President Tomooula Town January 21, 1991 City Council City of Temecula P.O. Box 3000 Temeccula, CA 92390 Subj: "Flagging" of Old Town Dear Council Members: Please be advised that the Temecula Town Association is in full support of the Old Town Temecula Merchants Association to initiate a program of displaying our country's flag during special events and holidays, This would seem to be most appropriate in light of the Persian Gulf War now in progress as well as showing our love of country at all times. We urge that your honorable body take whatever steps you deem appropriate in helping to bring this about. Sin~rely, General Manager By order of the TTA Board on unanimous vote taken at said Boards meeting of January 17, 1991 cc: Old Town Temecula Merchants Association ITEM NO. 24 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Council/City Manager Engineering Department ~ March 26, 1991 City of Temecula Application For Inclusion In The National Flood Insurance Program RECOMMEN DAT ION: That the City Council: 1. READ by title only)introduce an ordinance entitled: An Ordinance of The City Council of The City of Temecula Adopting Regulations Regarding Flood Damage Prevention; 2. ADOPT Resolution No. 91- entitled: A Resolution of The City Council of The City of Temecula Complying With Requirements for Subsidized Flood Insurance; and e AUTHORIZE the City Engineer to submit the application for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, DISCUSSION: The City Council adopted by reference portions of the non-codified Riverside County Ordinances by Ordinances 89-01 and 90-0q. Included in these adoptions was County Ordinance No. q58 regulating flood hazard areas and implementing the National Flood Insurance Program. The adoption of this ordinance in itself did not assure flood insurance availability to the City residents, STAFFRPT\ FLOODINS The Department of Water Resources, State of California, on behalf of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), has invited our community to apply to the National Flood Insurance Programs as soon as possible. By so participating in this program, flood insurance under the FEMA program will be available for properties within the City of Temecula. A Community Contact Report prepared by FEMA reminded that there was major damage in this area during the 1978 and 1980 flood disasters. The recent storms disclosed that a number of areas are subject to both flooding and related damages resulting from higher intensity storm runoffs. The recent storms did not exhibit the level of damage which can result from the 100 year or even lesser intensity major storms. The documents as prepared and presented for City Council consideration and approval are those required for submittal in application for this flood insurance program participation, The obligations incumbent on the City by participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) are set forth in the text of Resolution 91- . The obligation of the City of Temecula will be to exact adequate land use an--~-control measures using effective enforcement provisions to reduce future flood losses and thereby maintain eligibility for flood damage insurance coverage. FISCAL IMPACT: Administrative and clerical costs related to analysis of development applications, liaison with FEMA and other affected agencies, and the preparation and storage of related reports and files. AC:ks Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Resolution 3. Application STAFFRPT\FLOODINS ORDINANCE NO. 90- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.0 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION, FINDINGS OF FACT, PURPOSE AND METHODS SECTION 1.1 STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION The Legislature of the State of California has in Government Code Sections 65302,65560 and 65800 conferred upon local government units authority to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare of its citizenry. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Temecula does adopt the regulations set forth herein SECTION 1.2 FINDINGS OF FACT A. The flood hazard areas of the City of Temecula are subject to periodic inundation which results in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety and general welfare. B. These flood losses are caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in areas of special flood hazards which increase flood heights and velocities, and when inadequately anchored, damage uses in other areas. Uses that are inadequately floodproofed, elevated or otherwise protected from flood damage also contribute to the flood loss. SECTION 1.3 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE It is the purpose of this ordinance to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in specific areas by provisions designed: A. To protect human life and health; B. To minimize expenditure of public money for costly flood control projects; C. To minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding and generally undertaken at the expense of the general public; D. To minimize prolonged business interruptions; E. To minimize damage to public facilities and utilities such as water and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in areas of special flood hazard; 5/ORDI7 -1- F. To help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of areas of special flood hazard so as to minimize future flood blight areas; G. To insure that potential buyers are notified that property is in an area of special flood hazard; and H. To insure that those who occupy the areas of special flood hazard assume responsibility for their actions. SECTION 1.4 METHODS OF REDUCING FLOOD LOSSES In order to accomplish its purposes, this ordinance includes methods an provisions for: A. Restricting or prohibiting uses which are dangerous to health, safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging increases in erosion or flood heights or velocities; B. Requiring that uses vulnerable to floods, including facilities which serve such uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial construction; C. Controlling the alteration of natural floodplains, stream, channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel flood waters; D. Controlling fill, grading, dredging, and other development which may increase flood damage; and, E. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally divert flood waters or which may increase flood haTards in other areas. SECTION 2.0 DEFINITIONS Unless specifically defined below, words or phrases used in this ordinance shall be interpreted so as to give them the meaning they have in common usage and to give this ordinance its most reasonable application. "Accessory Use" means a use which is incidental and subordinate to the principle use of the parcel of land on which it is located. "Alluvial Fan" means a geomorphologic feature characterized by a cone or fan-shaped deposit of boulders, gravel, and fine sediments that have been eroded from mountains slopes, transported by flood flows, and then deposited on the valley floors, and which is subject to flash flooding, high velocity floods, debris flows, erosion, sediment movement and deposition, and channel migration. "Apex" means the point of highest elevation on an alluvial fan, which on undisturbed fans is generally the point where the-major stream that formed the fan emerges from the mountain front. 5lORD17 -2- "Appeal" means a request for review of the Floodplain Administrator's interpretation of any provision of this ordinance or a request for a variance. "Area of Shallow Flooding" means a designated AO or AH Zone on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The base flood depths range from one to three feet; a clearly defined channel does not exist; the path of flooding is unpredictable and indeterminate; and velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. "Area of Special Flood-Related Erosion Hazard" is the land within a community which is most likely to be subject to severe flood-related erosion looses. The area may be designated as Zone E on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). "Area of Special Flood Hazard" - See "Special Flood Hazard Area." "Area of Special Mudslide (i.e., mudflow) Hazard" is the area subject to severe mudslides (i.e., mudflows). The area is designated as Zone M on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). "Backfill" means the placement of fill material within a specified depression, hole or excavation pit below the surrounding adjacent ground level as a means of improving flood water conveyance or to restore the land to the natural contours existing prior to excavation. "Base Flood" means the flood having a one percent chance of being equalled or exceeded in any given year (also called the "100-year flood"). "Basement" means any area of the building having its floor subgrade (below ground level) on all sides. "Building" - See "Structure" "Critical Feature" means an integral and readily identifiable part of a flood protection system, without which the flood protection provided by the entire system would be compromised. "Curvilinear Line" means the border on either a Flood Hazard Boundary Map or Flood Insurance Rate Map that delineates the special flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or floodrelated erosion hazard areas and consists of a curved or contour line that follows the topography. "Development" means any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials. "Encroachment" means the advance or infringement of uses, plant growth, fill, 5lORD17 -3- excavation, building, permanent structures or development into a floodplain which may impede or alter the flow capacity of a floodplain. "Erosion'~ means the process of the gradual wearing away of land masses. This peril is not per se covered under the National Flood Insurance Program. "Existing Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction or facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including, at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed before the effective date of the floodplain management regulations adopted by a community. "Expansion to and Existing Manufactured Home Park or Subdivision" means the preparation of additional sites by the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to be affixed (including the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads). "FLIP' is the placement of fill material at a specified location to bring the ground surface up to a desired elevation. "Fill Material~ can be natural sand, dirt, soil or rock. For the purposes of floodplain management, fill material may include concrete, cement, brick or similar material as approved on a case-by-case basis. "Flood, Flooding, or Flood Water" means (a) a general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry land areas from (1) the overflow of inland or tidal waters, (2) the unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source, and/or (3) mudslides (i.e.,mudflows) which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this definitions and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of water and deposited along the path of the current; and (b) the collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result o erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accom~ed by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this definition. "Flood Elevation Determination" means a determination by the Administrator of the water surface elevations of the base flood, that is, the flood level that has a one percent or greater chance of occurrence in any given year. "Flood Elevation Study" means an examination, evaluation and determination of flood hazards and, f appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations or an examination, evaluation and determination of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood-related erosion hazards. 5/ORD17 4- "Flood Hazard Boundary Map" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated the areas of flood hazards. "Flood In,rance Rate Map (FIRM)" means the official map on which the Federal Emergency Management Agency or Federal Insurance Administration has delineated both the areas of special flood hazards and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. "Flood In,rance Study" means the official report provided by the Federal Insurance Administration that includes flood profiles, the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the Flood Boundary and Floodway Map, and the water surface elevation of the base flood. "Floodplain or Flood-Prone Area" means any land area susceptible to being inundated by water from any source (see definition of "flooding"0 "Floodplain Administrator" is the individual appointed to administer and enforce the floodplain management regulations. "Floodplain Management" means the operation of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood control works and floodplain management regulations. "Floodplain Management Regulations" means zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations, building codes health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as floodplain management regulations. "Flood Protection System" means those physical structural works for which funds have been authorized, appropriated, and expended and which have been constructed specifically to modify flooding in order to reduce the extent of the area within a community subject to a "special flood hazard" and the extent of the depths of associated flooding. Such a system typically includes hurricane tidal barriers, dams, reservoirs, levees or dikes. These specialized flood modifying works are those constructed to conform with sound engineering standards. "Fioodproof'mg" means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to real estate or improved real property, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents. "Flood-Related Erosion" means the collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water as a result of undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of nature, such as a flash flood or an abnormal tidal surge, or by some similarly unusual and unforeseeable event which results in flooding. 5/ORDI7 -5- "Flood-Related Erosion Area" or "flood-related erosion prone area" mans a land area adjoining the shoe of a lake or other body of water, which due to the composition of the shoreline or bank and high water levels or wind-driven currents, is likely to suffer flood-related erosion damage. "Flood-related erosion area management" means the operations of an overall program of corrective and preventive measures for reducing flood-related erosion damage, including but not limited to emergency preparedness plans, flood-related erosion control works, and floodplain management regulations. "Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land area that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevations more than one foot. Also referred to as "Regulatory Floodway". "Floodway Encroachment Lines" means the lines marking the limits of floodways on Federal State and local floodplains maps. "Floodway Fringe" is the areas of a floodplain on either side of the designated floodway where encroachment may be permitted. "Fraud and Victimization" related to Section 6, "Variances", of this ordinance means that the variance granted must not cause fraud on or victimization of the public. In examining this requirement, the Variance Board will consider the fact that every newly constructed building adds to government responsibilities and remains a part of the community for fifty to one hundred years. Buildings that are permitted to be constructed below the base flood elevation are subject during all those years to increased risk of damage from floods, while future owners of the property and the community as a whole are subject to all the costs, inconvenience, danger, and suffering that those increased flood damages bring. In addition, future owners may purchase the property, unaware that it is subject to potential flood damage, and can be insured only at a very high flood insurance rates. "Freeboard" means a factor of safety usually expressed in feet above a flood level for purposes of floodplain management. "Freeboard" tends to compensate for the many unknown factors that could contribute to flood heights greater than the height calculated for a selected size flood and floodway conditions, such as wave action, bridge openings, and the hydrological effect of urbanization of the watershed. "Functionally dependent use" means a use which cannot perform its intended purpose unless it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes only docking facilities, port facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or passengers, and ship building and ship repair facilities, but does not include long-term storage or related manufacturing facilities. "Hardship" as related to Section 6, "Variances", of this ordinance means the hardship 5/ORDI7 -6- that would result from a failure to grant the requested variance. The Variance Board requires that the variance be exceptional, unusual, and peculiar to the property involved. Mere economic or financial hardship alone is not exceptional. Inconvenience, aesthetic considerations, physical handicaps, personal preferences, or the disapproval of one's neighbors likewise cannot, as a rule, qualify as exceptional hardships. All of these problems can be resolved through other means, without granting a variance. This is so even if the alternative means are more expensive or complicated than building with a variance, or if they require the property owner to put the parcel to a different use than originally intended, or to build elsewhere. "Highest adjacent grad~" means the highest natural elevation of the ground surface prior to construction next to the proposed walls of a structure. "Historic Structure" means any structure that is: (a) listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register; (b) Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district registered historic district; (c) Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior; or (d) Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic preservation programs that have been certified either: (1) by an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior or (2) Directly by the Secretary of the interior in states with approved programs. "Landfill" means a permitted location for the disposal, placement or dumping or garbage, trash, debris, junk or waste material. "Levee" means the man-made structure, usually an earthen embankment, designed and constructed in accordance with sound engineering practices to contain, control or divert the flow of water so as to provide protection from temporary flooding. "Levee System" means a flood protection system which consists of a levee, or levees, and associated structures, such as closure and drainage devices, which are constructed and operated in accord with sound engineering practices. "Lowest floor" means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basemen0. An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a buildings' lowest floor; provided, such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non-elevation design requirements of this ordinance. "Manufactured Home" means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include a 5/O!1D17 -7- "recreational vehicle". "lVionufactured Home Park or Subdivision" means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. "Map" means the Flood Hazard Boundary Map (FHBM) or the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for a community issued by the flood Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency. "Mean Sea Level" means, for purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program, the National Geodetic vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which base flood elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced. "Minlmnm Necessary" related to Section 6, "Variances", of this ordinance means the minimum necessary to afford relief to the applicant of a variance with a minimum deviation from the requirements of this ordinance. In the case of variances to an elevation requirement, this means the Variance board need not grant permission for the applicant to build at grade, for example, or even to whatever elevation the applicant proposes, but only that level that the Board believes will both provide relief and preserve the integrity of the local ordinance. "Mudslide" (i.e., mudflow) describes a condition where there is a river, flow or inundation of liquid mud down a hillside usually as a result of a dual condition of loss of brush cover, and the subsequent accumulation of water on the ground proceeded by a period of usually heavy or sustained rain. "New Construction", for floodplain management purposes, means structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community and includes any subsequent improvements to such structures. "New Manufactured Home Park and Subdivision" means a manufactured home park or subdivision for which the construction of facilities for servicing the lots on which the manufactured homes are to affixed (including at a minimum, the installation of utilities, the construction of streets, and either final site grading or the pouring of concrete pads) is completed on or after the effective date of floodplain management regulations adopted by a community. "Obstruction" includes but is not limited to any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, protection, excavation, channelizafion, bridge, conduit, culvert, building, wire, fence, rock, grave, refuse, fill, structure, vegetation or other material in, along, across or projecting into any watercourse which may alter, impede, retard or change the direction and/or velocity of the flow of water, or due to tits location, its propensity to snare of collect debris carried by the flow of water or its likelihood of being carried downstream. "One hundred year flood" or "100-year flood" means a flood which has a one percent 5/O!1D17 -8- annual probability of being equalled or exceeded. It is identical to the "base flood", which will be the term used throughout this ordinance. "Principle Structure" means a structure used for the principal use of the property as distinguished from an accessory use. "Public Safety and Nuisances" as related to Section 6, "Variances", of this ordinance means the granting of a variance must not result in additional threats to public safety or create nuisances. This ordinance is intended to help protect the health, safety, well-being, and property of the local citizens. This is a long-range community effort made up of a combination of approaches such as adequate drainage systems, warning and evacuation plans, and keeping new property above the flood level. These long-term goals can only be met if exceptions to the requirements of this ordinance are kept to a bare minimum. "Recreational Vehicle" means a vehicle which is: a) built on a single chassis; b) 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection; c) designed to be self- propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck; and d) designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, level, or seasonal use. "Regulatory Floodway" means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height. "Riverine" means relating to, formed by, or resembling a river (including tributaries), stream, brook, etc. "Sheet Flow Area" - see "area of shallow flooding" "Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)" means an area having special flood or flood- related erosion hazards, and shown on an FI-IBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, A1-A30, AE, A99 or ,AH. "Start of Construction" includes substantial improvement and other proposed development and means the date the building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction, repair, reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, or other improvement was within 180 days from the date of the permit. The actual start means either the first placement of permanent construction of a structure on a site, ;such as the pouring of slab or footings, the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of excavation; or the placement of a manufacture home on a foundation. Permanent construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading and filling; nor does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways; nor does it include excavation for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of 'temporary forms; nor does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or sheds not occupied as dwelling units or 5/ORD17 -9- not part of the main structure. For a substantial improvement the actual start of construction means the first alternation of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affect the external dimensions of the building. "Structure" means a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. "Substantial Damage" means any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other proposed new development of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures which have incurred "substantial damage", regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either (1) any project for improvement of a structure to correct exciting violations or state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions or (2) any alteration of a "historic structure", provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure". "Variance" means a grant of relief from the requirements of this ordinance which permits construction in a manner that would otherwise be prohibited by this ordinance. "Water Surface Elevation" means the height,in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929, (or other datum, where specified) of floods of various magnitudes and frequencies in the floodplains of coastal or riverinc areas. "Watercourse" means a lake, river, creek, stream, wash, arroyo, channel or other topographic feature on or over which waters flow at least periodically. Watercourse includes specifically designated areas in which substantial flood damage may occur. SECTION 3.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 3.1 LANDS TO WHICH THIS ORDINANCE APPLIF_.S This ordinance shall apply to all areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards and areas of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) haTards within the jurisdiction of The City of Temecula. SECTION 3.2 BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING THE AREAS OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD The areas of special flood hazard identified by the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) of the federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) dated {date} and the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), dated {date}, and all subsequent amendments and/or revisions, are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this ordinance. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) and attendant mapping is the minimum area of applicability of its ordinance and may be supplemented by studies for other areas which allow implementation of this ordinance and which are recommended to the City Council by the Floodplain Administrator. The study and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) are on file at 5/ORDI7 -10- {Address--City Hall/County Administration Building/Planning Department/Public Works, etc. }. SECTION 3.3 COMPLIANCE No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted, or altered without full compliance with the term of this ordinance and other applicable regulations. Violation of the requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection with conditions) shall constitute a misdemeanor. Nothing herein shall prevent the City Council from taking such lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. SECTION 3.4 ABROGATION AND GREATER RESTRICTIONS This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restfictions. However, where this ordinance and another ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more stringent restrictions hall prevail. SECTION 3.5 INTERPRETATION In the interpretation and application of this ordinance, all provisions shall be: Considered as minimum requirements; Liberally construed in favor of the City Council; and, Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes. SECTION 3.6 WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY The degree of flood protection required by this ordinance is considered reasonable for regulatory purposes and is based on scientific and engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood heights may be increased by man-made or natural causes. This ordinance does not imply that land outside the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards and areas of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) hazards or uses permitted within such areas will be free from flooding or flood damages. This ordinance shall not create liability on the part of City Council, any officer or employee thereof, or the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, for any flood damages that result from reliance on this ordinance or any administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. SECTION 3.7 SEVERABILITY This ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby declared to be severable. Should any section of this ordinance be declared by the courts to be unconstitutional or invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as the whole, or any portion thereof other than the section so declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. SECTION 4.0 ADMINISTRATION SECTION 4.1 ESTABLISHMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT A development permit shall be obtained before any construction or other development begins within any area of special flood hazard, areas of flood-related erosion hazard or areas of mudslide (i.e., 5/ORDI7 -11- mudflow) established in Section 3.2. Application for a development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the area in question; existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required: A. Proposed elevation in relation to mean seal level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures. In Zone AO elevation of highest adjacent grade and proposed elevation of lowest floor of all structures. B. Proposed elevation in relation to mean seal level to which any structure will be floodproofed; C. All appropriate certifications listed in Section 4.3.D of this ordinance; and D. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result of proposed development. SECTION 4.2 DESIGNATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The {City Manager/Director of Planning/Public Works/Building Inspection/etc. } is hereby appointed to administer, implement and enforce this ordinance by granting or denying development permits in accord with its provisions. SECTION 4.3 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE FLOODPLAIN ADMINISTRATOR The duties and responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator shall include, but not be limited to: A. Permit review 1. Review all development permits to determine that the permit requirements of this ordinance have been satisfied; 2. All other required state and federal permits have been obtained. 3. The site is reasonably safe from flooding; and 4. The proposed development does not adversely affect the carrying capacity of areas where base flood elevations have been determined but a floodway has not been designated. For purpose of this ordinance, "adversely affects' means that the cumulative effect of the proposed development when combined with all other existing and anticipated development will increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point. B. Use of other flood data. When base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with Section 3.2, the Floodplain Administrator shall obtain, review, and reasonably utilize any base flood elevation and floodway data available from a federal or state 5/ORDI7 -12- agency, or other source, in order to administer Section 5.0. Any such information shall be submitted to the City Council for adoption. C. Whenever a watercourse is to be altered or relocated. 1. Notify adjacent communities and the California Department of Water Resources prior to such alternation or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such notification to the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2. Require that the flood carrying capacity of the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse is maintained. D. Obtain and maintain for public inspection and make available as needed: 1. the certification required by Section 5.1.C. 1 (floor elevation); shallow flooding); the certification required by Section 5.1.C.2 (elevations in areas of 3. the certification required by Section 5.1.C.3.c (elevation or floodproofing of nonresidential structures); floodproofing standards); the certification required by Section 5.1.C.4a or 5.1.C.4b (wet standards); the certification of elevation required by Section 5.3.B (subdivision encroachments); 6. the certification required by Section 5.6.A (floodway standards); and the information required by Section 5.7.F (coastal construction 8. the reports required by Section 5.8.D (mudflow standards). E. Make interpretations where needed, as to the exact location of the boundaries of the areas of special flood hazards, areas of flood-related erosion hazards or areas of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) (for example, where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions). The person contesting the location of the boundary shall be given a reasonable opportunity to appeal the interpretation as provided in Section 6.0. 5/ORDI7 -13- F. Take action to remedy violations of this ordinance as specified in Section 3.3 herein. SECTION 5.0 PROVISIONS FOR FLOOD HAZARD REDUCTION SECTION 5.1 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION In all areas of special flood hazards the following standards are required: A. Anchoring 1. All new construction and substantial improvements shall be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. Section 5.4. All manufactured homes hall meet the anchoring standards of B. Construction Materials and Methods. 1. All new construction and substantial improvement shall be constructed with materials and utility equipment resistant and flood damage. 2. All new construction and substantial improvement shall be consmeted using methods and practices and minimize flood damage. 3. All new construction and substantial improvement shall be consmeted with electrical,heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities that are designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. 4. Require within Zones AH or AO that adequate drainage paths around structures on slopes to guide flood waters around and away from proposed structures. C. Elevation and Floodproofing 1. New construction and substantial improvement shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated to or above the base flood elevation. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 5.1.C.3. Upon the completion of the structure the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the community building inspector to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 2. New construction and substantial improvement in Zone AO shall have the lowest floor, including basement, elevated above the highest adjacent grade at least as 5/ORDI7 -14- high as the depth number specified in feet on the FIRM, or at least two feet if no depth number is specified. Nonresidential structures may meet the standards in Section 5.1.C.3. Upon the completion of the structure the elevation of the lowest floor including basement shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor, or verified by the community building inspector to be properly elevated. Such certification or verification shall be provided to the Floodplain Coordinator. 3. Nonresidential construction shall either be elevated to conform with 5.1.C. 1 or 2. or together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities: a. be floodproofed so that below the base flood level the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water; b. have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy; and c. be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the standards of this subsection are satisfied. Such certifications shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator. 4. Require, for all new construction and substantial improvement that fully enclosed areas below the lowest floor that area usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement and which are subject to flooding shall be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing or the entry an exit of floodwater. Designs for meeting this requirement must either be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed the following minimum criteria. a. Either a minimum of two opening shave a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding shall be provided, the bottom of all openings hall be no higher than one foot above grade (openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves or other coverings or devices provide that they permit the automatic entry and exit of floodwater): or b. Be certified to comply with a local floodproofing standards approved by the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency. 5. Manufactured homes shall so meet the standards in Section 5.4. SECTION 5.2 STANDARDS FOR UTILITIES A. All new and replacement water supply and sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system and discharge from systems into flood waters. 5/ORDI7 -15- B. On-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to them or contamination from them during flooding. C. Other utilities are addressed at 5.1.B and 5.3.D. SECTION 5.3 STANDARDS FOR SUBDIVISIONS A. All preliminary subdivision proposals shall identify the flood hazards area and the elevation of the base flood. B. All subdivision plans will provide the elevation of proposed structure(s) and pad(s). If the site is filled above the base flood elevation, the final first floor and pad elevations shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or surveyor and provided to the Floodplain Administrator. flood damage. All subdivision proposals shall be consistent with the need to minimize D. All subdivision proposals have public utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located and constructed to minimize flood damage. flood hazards. All subdivisions shall provide adequate drainage to reduce exposure to SECTION 5.4 STANDARDS FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES A. All manufactured homes that are placed for substantially improved within a special flood hazard area on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map 1) outside of a manufactured home park or subdivision, 2) in a new manufactured home park or subdivision, 3) in an expansion to an existing manufactured home park or subdivision, 4) in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on which a manufactured home has incurred ' substantial damage" as the result of a flood: 1. Be elevated on a permanent foundation such that the lowest floor of the manufactured home is elevated to or above the base flood elevation and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist floatafion collapse and lateral movement. B. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites in an existing manufactured home park or subdivision on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map that axe not subject to the provisions of paragraph 5.4.A. of this section will be elevated so that either: 1. The lowest floor of the manufactured home'is at or above the base 5/ORDI7 -16- flood elevation, or 2. The manufactured home chassis is supported by reinforced piers or other foundation elements of at lease equivalent strength that are no less than 36 inches in height above grade and be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system to resist floatation, collapse, and lateral movement. C. All manufactured homes to be placed or substantially improved on sites within Zones V1-30,V and VE on the community's FIRM shall meet the applicable standards of Items A and B above as well as the standards of Section 5.7. SECTION5.5 STANDARDS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES All recreational vehicles placed on sites within a floodplain shown on the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map will either: A. Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, B. Be fully licensed and ready for highway use, or C. Meet the permit requirements of Section 4 of this ordinance and the elevation and anchoring requirements for manufactured homes in 5.4 of this section. SECTION 5.6 FLOODWAYS Located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 3.2 are areas designated as floodways. Since the floodway is extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood waters which carry debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, the following provisions apply: A. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvement, and other new development unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood level during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. B. If Section 5.6.A. is satisfied, all new construction, substantial improvement and other proposed new development shall comply with all other applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Section 5. SECTION 5.7 COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREAS Within coastal high hazard areas established in Section 3.2, the following standards shall apply: A. All new construction and substantial improvement shall be elevated on adequately anchored pilings or columns and securely anchored to such pilings or columns so that the lowest horizontal portion of the structural members of the lowest floor (excluding the pilings or columns) is elevated to or above the base flood level. The pile or column foundation and structure attached hereto is anchored to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement due to the 5/ORDI7 -17- effects of wind and water loads acting simultaneously on all building components. Water loading values used shall be those associated with the base flood. Wind loading values used shall be those required by applicable State or local building standards. B. All new construction and other development shall be located on the landward side of the reach of mean high tide. C. All new construction and substantial improvement shall have the space below the lowest floor free of obstructions and constructed with breakaway walls as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance. Such enclosed space shall not be used for human habitation and will be useable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. buildings. De Fill shall not be used for structural support of E. Man-made alteration of sand dunes which would increase potential flood damage is prohibited. records: Fo The Floodplain Administrator shall obtain and maintain the following 1. Certification by a registered engineer or architect that a proposed structure complies with Section 5.7.A. 2. The elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the bottom of the lowest structural member of the lowest floor (excluding pilings or columns) of all new and substantially improved structures, and whether such structures contain a basement. SECTION 5.8 MUDSLIDE (i.e., MUDFLOW) - PRONE AREAS A. The Floodplain Administrator shall review permits for proposed construction of other developments to determine if it is proposed within a mudslide area. B. Permits shall be reviewed to determine that the proposed development is reasonably safe from mudslide hazards. Factors to be considered in making this determination include but are not limited to: 1. The type of quality of soils; 2. Evidence of ground water or surface water problems; 3. The depth and quality of any fill; 4. The overall slope of the site; and 5/ORDI7 -18- 5. The weight that any proposed development will impose on the slope. apply: Co Within areas which have mudslide hazards, the following requirements 1. A site investigation and further review shall be made by persons qualified in geology and soils engineering; 2. The proposed grading, excavation, new construction, new construction, and substantial improvement shall be adequately designed and protected against mudslide damages; 3. The proposed grading, excavations, new construction and substantial improvement shall not aggravate the existing hazard by creating either off-site or off-site disturbances; and slope stability. Drainage, planting, watering and maintenance shall not endanger D. Within Zone M on the Flood Insurance Rate Map, the community shall adopt a drainage ordinance which at least complies with the standards of Sections 7001 through 7006 and Sections 7008 through 7015 of the most recent amendment of the 1973 Uniform Building Code: 1. The location of foundation and utility systems of new construction, substantial improvement and other proposed new development; e fills and planted slopes; The location, drainage and maintenance of all excavations, cuts and 3. Protective measures including but not limited to retaining walls, buttress fills, subdrains, divefret terraces, benthing, etc; and 4. Engineering drawings and specifications to be submitted or all corrective measures, accompanied by supporting soils engineering and geology reports. SECTION 5.9 FLOOD-RELATED EROSION-PRONE AREAS A. The Floodplain Administrator shall require permits for proposed construction and other development within all flood-related erosion-prone areas as known to the community. 5lORD17 -19- B. The City Council shall hear and decide appeals when it is alleged there is an error in any requirement, decision, or determination made by the Floodplain Administrator in the enforcement or administration of this ordinance. C. In passing upon such applications, The City Council shall consider all technical evaluations, all relevant factors, standards specified in other sections of this ordinance, and: the danger that materials may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others; 2. the danger of life and property due to flooding or erosion damage; 3. the susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the existing individual owner and future owners of the property; the importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community; 5. the necessity to the facility of a waterfront location, where applicable; 6. the availability of alternative locations for the proposed use which are not subject to flooding or erosion damage; the compatibility of the proposed use with existing and anticipated development; 8. the relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and floodplain management program for the area; and emergency vehicles; the safety of access to the property in time of flood for ordinary 10. the expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site; and, 11. the costs of providing governmental services during and after flood conditions, including maintenance and repair of pubic utilities and facilities such as sewer, gas, electrical, and water system, and street and bridges. D. Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written notice over the signature of a community official that 1) the issuance of a variance to construct a 5/ORDI7 -21- B. Such permits shall be reviewed to determine whether the proposed site alterations and improvements will be reasonably safe from flood-related erosion and will not cause flood-related erosion hazards or otherwise aggravate the existing hazard. C. If a proposed improvement is found to be in the path of flood-related erosion or would increase the erosion hazard, such improvement shall be relocated or adequate protective measures shall be taken to avoid aggravating the existing erosion hazard. D. Within Zone E on the flood Insurance Rate Map, a setback is required for all new development from the ocean, lake, bay, riverfront or other body of water to crate a safety buffer consisting of a natural vegetative or contour strip. This buffer shall be designated according to the flood-related erosion hazard and erosion rate, in relation to the anticipated "useful life" of structure, and depending upon the geologic, hydrologic, topographic and climatic characteristics of the land. The buffer may be used for suitable open space purposes, such as for agricultural, forestry, outdoor recreation and wildlife habitat areas, and for other activities using temporary and portable structures only. SECTION 6.0 VARIANCE PROCEDURE SECTION 6.1 NATURE OF VARIANCES The variance criteria set forth in this section of the ordinance are based on the general principle of zoning law that variances pertain to a piece of property and are not personal in nature. Though these standards vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, in general, a properly issued variance is granted for a parcel of property with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the requirements of this ordinance would create an exceptional hardship to the applicant or the surrounding property owners. The characteristics must be unique to the property and not be shared by adjacent parcels. The unique characteristics must pertain to the land itself, not to the structure, its inhabitants, or the property owners. It is the duty of the City Council to help protects its citizens from flooding. This need is so compelling, and the implications of the cost of insuring a structure built below flood level are so serious that variances from the flood elevation or from other requirements in the flood ordinance are quite rare. Therefore, the variance guidelines provided in this ordinance are more detailed and contain multiple provisions that must be met before a variance can be properly granted. The criteria are designed to screen out those situations in which alternatives other than a variance are more appropriate. SECTION 6.1 APPEAL BOARD A. The City Council of the City of Temecula shall hear and decide appeals and requests for variances from the requirements of this ordinance. 5/ORDI7 -20- and create no additional threats to public safety. G. Upon consideration of the factors of Section 6.1.C and the purposes of this ordinance, the City Council may attach such conditions to the granting of variances as it deems necessary to further the purpose of this ordinance. SECTION 7.0 Ordinance No 458 of the County of Riverside, which the City of Temecula adopted by reference pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-04 in hereby repealed. SECTION 8.0 SEVERABILITY. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. SECTION 9.0 The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. SECTION 10.0 EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council Members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. 5/ORDI7 -23- structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as 425 for $100 of insurance coverage and 2) such construction below the base flood level increases risks to life and property. A copy of the notice shall be recorded in a manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected parcel of land. E. The Floodplain Administrator will maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and report such variances issued in its biennial report submitted to the Federal Insurance Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency. SECTION 6.2 CONDITIONS FOR VARIANCES A. Generally, variances may be issued for new construction, substantial improvement and other proposed new development to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood level, providing that the procedures of Sections 4 and 5 of this ordinance have been fully considered. As the lot size increases beyond one-half acre, the technical justification required for issuing the variance increases. B. Variances may be issued for the repair or rehabilitation of "Historic Structures' (as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance) upon determination that the proposed repair or rehabilitation will not preclude the structure's continued designation as a historic structure and the variance is the minimum necessary to preserve the historic character and design of the structure. C. Variances shall not be issued within any designated floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. D. Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the "minimum necessary" (as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance), considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. E. Variances shall only be issued upon 1) a showing of good and sufficient cause; 2) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional 'hardship" (as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance) to the applicant; and 3) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, ereate 'nuisances' (as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance), cause 'fraud or vicfimizafion' (as defined in Section 2 of this ordinance) of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances. F. Variances may be issued for new construction, substantial improvement and other proposed new development necessary for the conduct of a functionally dependent use provided that the provisions of Secfions6.2.A through 6.2.E are satisfied and that the structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages during the base flood 5/ORDI7 -22- C. Cooperate with Federal, State, and local agencies and private firms which undertake to study, survey, map, and identify flood plain, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion areas, and cooperate with neighboring communities with respect to management or adjoining flood plain, mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood-related erosion areas in order to prevent aggravation of existing hazards. D. Submit on the anniversary date of the community's initial eligibility an annual report to the Administrator on the progress made during the past year within the community in the development and implementation of flood plain management measures. E. Upon occurrence, notify the Administrator in writing whenever the boundaries of the community have been modified by annexation or the community has otherwise assumed or no longer has authority to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations for a particular area. In order that all Flood Hazard Boundary Maps and Flood Insurance Rate Maps accurately represent the community's boundaries, include within such notification a copy of a map of the community suitable for reproduction, clearly delineating the new corporate limits or new area for which the community has assumed or relinquished flood plain management regulatory authority. SECTION 3. Appoints Public Works Director/City Engineer to maintain for public inspection and to furnish upon request, for the determination of applicable flood insurance risk premium rates within all areas having special flood hazards identified on a Flood Hazard Boundary Map or Flood Insurance Rate Map, and certificates of flood-proofing, and information on the elevation (in relation to mean seal level) of the level of the lowest habitable floor (including basement if habitable) of all new or substantially improved structures, and include whether or not such structures contain a basement, and if the structure has been floodproofed the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which the structure was floodproofed; SECTION 4. Agrees to take such other official action as may be reasonably necessary to carry out the objectives of the program. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. PASS~.n AND ADOPTED this day of , 1991. ATTEST: Ronald J. Parks, Mayor June S. Greek, City Clerk [SEAL] 51reso 150 -2- 03/18/91 RESOLUTION NO. 91- A RESOLU'I~ON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA COMPLYING WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBSIDIZED FLOOD INSURANCE WHEREAS, certain areas of the City of Temecula are subject to periodic flooding, mudslides, (i.e., mudflows), or flood-related erosion, causing serious damage to properties within these areas; and WHEREAS, relief is available in the form of Federally subsidized flood insurance as authorized by the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968; and WltEREAS, it is the intent of this City Council to require the recognition and evaluation of flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion hazards in all official actions relating to land use in areas having these hazards; and WltEREAS, this body has the legal authority to adopt land use and control measures to reduce future flood losses pursuant to State of California Government Code sections 65302, 65560 and 65800; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this City Council hereby: SECTION 1. Assures the Federal Insurance Administration that it will enact as necessary, and maintain in force in those areas having flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood- related erosion hazards, adequate land use and control measures with effective enforcement provisions consistent with the Criteria set forth in Section 1910 of the National Flood Insurance Program Regulations; and SECTION 2. Vests Public Works Director/City Engineer with the responsibility, authority, and means to: A. Assist the Administrator, at his request, in his delineation of the limits of the area having special flood, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood-related erosion hazards. B. Provide such information as the Administrator may request concerning present uses and occupancy of the flood plain, mudslide (i.e., mudflow), or flood- related erosion areas. 5/r~ao150 -1- 03/18/91 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY APPLICATION FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM 1. APPLICATION (City, town, etc.) CITY OF TEMECULA O,M.B. NO. 3067-0020 Expires December31, 1992 DATE COUNTY, STATE RIVERSIDE, CALI~ORNIA 92390 2. OFFICIAL, OFFICEORAGENCYWITHOVERALLRESPONSI81LITY Director of Public Works - City Engineer TELEPHONE NO. (Inclucle area code) (714) 694-6400 ADDRESS ~eet or box no., ci~ hate, z~ code) 43180 Business Park Dr.,Ste 200 Temecula, CA 92390 3. PROGRAM COORDINATOR (Official, if different from above, with overall respons~blity for implementing program) Director of Public Works - City Engineer ADDRESS ~treetorboxno.,city,~a~ z~code) 43180 Business Park Dr.,Ste 200 P.O. Box 3000 T~mecu]a. CA 92390 4. FIRSTFLOORELEVATIONINFORMATIONWILLBERECORDEDBY: Director of Public Works - City Engineer TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (714) 694-6400 TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (714) 694-6400 ADDRESS~treetorboxno.,city,~a~,z~code) 43180 Business Park Dr.,Ste 200 P.O. Box 3000 Temecula, CA 92390 5. LOCATIONOFCOMMUNITYREPOSITORYFORPUBLICINSPECTIONOFFIAMA~ City Engineer's Office ADDRESS 43180 Business Park Dr.,Ste 200 ?emecula, CA 92390 6. ESTIMATES FOR ONLY THOSE AREAS SUBJECT TO FLOOD AND/OR MUDSLIDE AS KNOWN AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION AREA POPULATION NO. OF 1-4 NO. OF SMALL NO. OF ALL FAMILY BUSINESS OTHER STRUCTURES STRUCTURES STRUCTURES 4 Square miles 5,000 2600 400 200 7. ESTIMATES OF TOTALS IN ENTIRE COMMUNITY -' .. .' : · ...... ' POPULATION FAMILY · 35 , 000 13 , 300 FEMA Fo~m 81-64, JAN 90 NO. OF SMALL BUSINESS . STRUCTURES 2000 REPLACES EDITION OF FEJt 8'~, WHICH IS OBSOLETE. NO. OF ALL OTHER STRUCTURES 1000 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS CITY OF TEMECULA) I, June S. Greek, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of ,19991, by the following roll call vote. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: June S. Greek, City Clerk 51re~o 150 -3- 03118191 CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PRESENTATIONS/ PROCLAMATIONS AGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT A REGULAR MEETING MARCH26, 1991 8:00 PM Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mu~oz PUBLIC COMMENTS Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of March 12, 1991, as mailed. 2 Sports Park Ballfield Liqhtin9 Project- Phase II RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Award contract to Assured Electrical Contractors Inc., for the Sports Park Ballfield Lighting Project - Phase II. COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT BOARD OF D/RECTORS REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next meeting: April 9, 1991,8:00 PM, Temporary Temecula Community Center, 27475 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula, California 4\CSDAgenda\03269! -1- 03/21/91 ITEM NO. 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT HELD MARCH 12, 1991 A regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 8:22 PM. PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mu~oz ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Also present were City Manger David F. Dixon, City Attorney Scott F. Field and June S. Greek, City Clerk. PUBLIC COMMENTS None given. CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Moore to approve Consent Calendar Items 1-4. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Linderoans, Moore, Parks, Mu~oz NOES: ABSENT: Minutes 0 DIRECTORS: None 0 DIRECTORS: None 1.1 Approve the minutes of February 26, 1991, as mailed. Ap/~rove Amendment to Contract with California Landscape 2.1 Approve amendment to contract with California Landscape Maintenance Inc., to provide landscape maintenance services for parks and slopes from March 1, 1991 through June 30, 1991. 4/Minute=/031281 -1- 03/18/91 CSD Minutes 3. .. March 12, 1991 Tractor Lease/Purchase 3.1 Award bid to Artesia Implement for a lease/purchase of one (1) tractor for the TCSD. Approve Extension of Contract- MacKensie Landscape 4.1 Approve extending contract with Mackensie Landscape for TCSD slope maintenance services. DISTRICT BUSINESS 5. Soorts Park Conceptual Master Plan Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, introduced the staff report. It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Moore to approve the Conceptual Master Plan of Sports Park. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Mu~oz NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None TCSD Assessment Audit Shawn Nelson, Community Services Director, introduced the staff report. Director Parks asked if the study completed last year by Wildan was being utilized for this audit. Mr. Nelson reported it will be used as a cross reference. City Attorney Field stated this report will actively identify every parcel in the City and classify it correctly, thus eliminating the "other" category shown on the last report. 4/Minutes/031281 -2- 03/18/91 CSD Minutes March 12, 1991 It was moved by Director Lindemans, seconded by Director Moore to authorize Muni Financial Services Inc., to prepare the TCSD Assessment Audit for FY 1991-92. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Lindemans, Moore, Parks, Approve Park Improvements to the Park Site on La Serena Way Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, introduced the staff report. It was moved by Director Birdsall, seconded by Director Moore to approve staff recommendations as follows: 7.1 7.2 Approve California Landscape Inc. to develop two sand areas at the park site on La Serena Way. Approve Miracle Equipment to provide and install two sets of playground equipment to be located in sand areas. The motion was carried by the following vote: AYES: 5 DIRECTORS: Birdsall, Mu~oz NOES: 0 DIRECTORS: None ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS: None Lindemans, Moore, Parks, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR REPORT Shawn Nelson, Director of Community Services, reported that Phase One Ballfield Lighting is on schedule and should be completed by the opening of the Little League Season. He stated Phase Two Lighting bids will be opened on March 15, 1991, at 4/Minutes/031281 -3- 03/18/91 CSD Minutes March 12, 1991 4:30 PM, and the bid will be awarded on March 26, 1991. Mr. Nelson also announced that a bid opening for Sam Hicks Monument Park Curb and Gutter proiect is set for March 28, 1991. Mr. Nelson stated that 38 teams are participating in Adult Softball Program which will begin on March 25, 1991. He also announced an Easter Egg Hunt at Sports Park on March 30, 1991 at 9:00 AM. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None given. DIRECTORS REPORTS Director Birdsall stated she would be leaving in the morning for Oakland to attend a League of California Cities Community Services Committee Meeting, and would bring back all the particulars of the conference in April, which four of the Parks and Recreation Commissioners will be attending. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Director Parks, seconded by Director Lindemans to adjourn at 8:52 PM. The motion was unanimously carried. Sal J. Mu~oz, President ATTEST: June S. Greek, City Clerk 4/Minut®l/031281 -4- 03/18/91 ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY FINANCE OFFICER ~~ CITY MANAGER TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS DAVID F. DIXON MARCH 26, 1991 SPORTS PARK BALLFIELD LIGHTING PROJECT- PHASE II PREPARED BY: SHAWN D. NELSON, COMMUNITY SERVICES DIRECTOR RECOMMENDA T/ON: That the Board of Directors: Award construction contract to Assured Electrical Contractors Inc., for the Sports Park Ballfield Lighting Project - Phase II. FISCAL IMPACT.' $139,700.00 is the lowest, qualified bid. Unencumbered funds exist in account #029-190-101-44-5804. DISCUSSION: Phase II of the Sports Park Lighting Project will retrofit the North and South fields, and install lights to the Upper South Soccer/Football field. Bid documents were prepared in accordance with the City's Public Works Bid Procedures. The following bids were submitted: 1. Assured Electrical Contractors Inc. 2. A.M. La Salle Electrical Inc. 3. Power Distributors Inc. $139,700.00 142,056.00 149,949.00 Bid bonds and Contractor's Licenses were verified by TCSD staff, and therefore, the low bid is in compliance with the City's requirements. No subcontractors will be used for this project. A copy of the bid opening log sheet and a plan of the fields involved in Phase II are enclosed for your review. BID OPEN-I~G DATE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CITY OF TEMECULA BID OPENING LOG SHEET BID AMOUNT BID BOND BIDDER: ,/ e 10. CC: City Clerk's Staff (3) Initiating Department (1) City Manager (1) Dated~ ,zl lq ['~ l 2\forms\bids\B4) 10