HomeMy WebLinkAbout080614 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please
contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 6, 2014 — 6:00 PM
Next in Order:
Resolution: 14-19
PRELUDE MUSIC: Earlene Bundy
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero
Roll Call: Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Business Spotlight Recognition Presentation, PHS/MWA Aviation Services, Christine
Damko
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon
colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission
Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three-minute time
limit for individual speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Action Minutes of July 16, 2014
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Planning Application No. PA14-0053 a Maior Modification application to allow Van
Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan
for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates) generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road,
east of Walcott Lane north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APNs: 957-
170-032 through 036), James Atkins
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14-0053, A
MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW VAN DAELE
DEVELOPMENT TO REVISE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRODUCT
TYPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR WALCOTT ESTATES, GENERALLY
LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, EAST OF WALCOTT
LANE, NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND SOUTH OF CALLE CHAPOS
(APNS: 957-170-032 THROUGH 036)
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONER SUBCOMMITTEE(S)
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, September 3, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers,
41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic
Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda
packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the
respective meeting.
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the
agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula,
8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be
available for public viewing at the respective meeting.
If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula
Civic Center, (951) 694-6400.
ITEM 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
DATE: August 6, 2014
SUBJECT: Business Recognition Program — PHS/MWA Aviation Services
PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst
BACKGROUND: The mission of PHS/MWA Aviation Services is to be known as a
world class provider of aircraft repairs and replacement parts. They accomplish this through
creative innovation in engineering of replacement parts and repair practices to give customers a
competitive edge by reducing costs.
PHS/MWA is currently operating in approximately 100,000 square feet of total space consisting
of six industrial machine shops across two buildings on the same campus with approximately
160 employees. This allows PHS/MWA to provide long term service and repair contracts with
major airlines worldwide. They have the ability to create custom service programs for theirr
clients, enabling quicker turn around, resulting in less downtime and creating higher return on
investment.
ITEM 2
PRELUDE MUSIC:
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
ABSENT:
Staff Attendees:
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JULY 16, 2014 — 6:00 PM
Earlene Bundy
Commissioner Carey
Carey, Guerriero, Harter, Kight, and Telesio
CAREY, KIGHT
Villa, Lee, Fisk, Kelly -Lehner, De LaTorre, Atkins
Next in Order:
Resolution: 14-18
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action..
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Action Minutes of June 4, 2014 APPROVED 3-0-2-0; MOTION BY
COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO;
AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO;
CAREY, KIGHT ABSENT
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
2 Planning Application No. PA14-0057. a Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula
Valley Event Center LLC, an indoor venue for public and private gatherings including
live indoor entertainment, to operate under a Type 57 ABC License (Special on Sale
General) liquor license, located at 27345 Jefferson Avenue. (Plaza Seville Center),
James Atkins APPROVED 3-0-2-0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO,
SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO: AYE VOTES FROM COMMIS-
SIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO; CAREY, KIGHT ABSENT
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-18
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION PA14-0057, A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE TEMECULA VALLEY EVENT
CENTER, A VENUE FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
GATHERINGS INCLUDING LIVE INDOOR ENTERTAINMENT, TO OPERATE
UNDER A TYPE 57 ABC LICENSE (SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL) LIQUOR
LICENSE, LOCATED AT 27345 JEFFERSON AVENUE (PLAZA SEVILLE
CENTER) (APN 909-270-044)
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S)
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: August 6, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street,
Temecula, California.
Stanley Harter
Chairman
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Director of Community Development
ITEM 3
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: August 6, 2014
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
PREPARED BY: James Atkins, Case Planner
PROJECT Planning Application No. PA14-0053, a Major Modification
SUMMARY: application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously
approved product type and landscape plan (PA10-0146) for The
Vineyards (Walcott Estates), generally located west of Butterfield
Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and
south of Calle Chapos
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of
Approval
CEQA: Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations. No
further analysis is required. Negative Declaration for the project
adopted January 24, 2012.
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Christine Moore
General Plan L - Low Density Residential
Designation:
Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on L - Low Density
Residential
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Site: Vacant Hillside and Valley
North: Large Lot Rural Development with Roripaugh Ranch Just Beyond
South: Single -Family Residential at a LM - Low Medium Density
East: Single -Family Residential at a VL - Very Low Density
West: Single -Family Residential at a VL - Very Low Density
G:\PLANNING\2014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx
1
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The property entitled The Vineyards (formerly Walcott Estates), received approval for a General
Plan Amendment, Zone Change to PDO, Tentative Tract Map, and Home Product Review
Application on January 24, 2012. The community is comprised of 45 single-family lots on 25
gross acres, resulting in a density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision was designed
as a cluster/conservation community in an effort to preserve habitat and a blue line stream.
Additionally, the design created community amenities that include trails and 13 acres of
preserved, permanent open space.
On March 11, 2014, Christine Moore submitted Planning Application PA14-0053, a Major
Modification application. The application will allow Van Daele homes to revise the previously
approved product type and landscape plan for The Vineyards. The project will still consist of
three distinct floor plans;, however the modification seeks to retain the Spanish architectural
style, eliminate the Craftsman and Tuscan styles, and add French Cottage, Monterey, and
Andalusian, resulting in a total of four distinct styles. The modification also proposes to
introduce a grape vine 'vineyard' element into the landscape design.
ANALYSIS
Architecture
The original project proposed 3 two-story floor plans with three distinct architectural styles. The
styles included Spanish, Tuscan, and, Craftsman. This modification proposes architectural
styles that represent a vineyard character. The Spanish architectural style is retained while
Tuscan and Craftsman styles have been replaced with French Cottage, Andalusian, and
Monterey styles.
Each elevation provides distinct architectural enhancements and articulation. Visual interest is
achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and
depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials emphasize the
various architectural styles.
The proposed plans include well pronounced front entries with the use of arched entries,
extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors
are distinct and compatible with the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches
provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style.
There are three different combinations of building materials and colors for each of the four
architectural styles. The color variation, stucco, stone and brick veneer serve to break up the
massing of the two-story units.
The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural
style and elevation. Each of the four proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials,
with articulation provided on all elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and
materials that attempt to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style:
• Spanish: Stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, clay pipe accents, zero
eaves, exposed rafter tails and wood fascia, arched entrances, arched and rectangular
multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, decorative Spanish tiles at front porches
and entries, decorative iron railings, and decorative foam trim elements.
• French Cottage: stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 6:12 roof pitch, wood fascia, lap
siding and wood corbels under gable ends, significant stone veneer massing, decorative
GAPLANNING2014TA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOMPlanningTlanning Commission\Staff Report.docx
2
multi -pane windows, wood beams and posts at front porches and entries, decorative
shutters. and decorative foam trim elements.
Andalusian: stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, gable roofs with wood
corbels, wood fascia, brick veneer massing, decorative multi -pane windows and
shutters, brick trim and headers at front porches and entries, arched entrances,
decorative shutters, and decorative foam trim elements.
Monterey: smooth stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, exposed rafter
tails and wood fascia, brick veneer massing, second -story cantilevered balcony, arched
and rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, brick headers at front
porches and entries, decorative iron railings, and decorative foam trim elements.
In addition to the varied architectural styles, the proposed product placement provides a varied
and visually interesting street scene which has been achieved through creative product
placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The products have
been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the PDO.
Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed and
conditioned to incorporate architectural enhancements which include pop outs, shutters, decks,
and additional roof elements. The lots that require additional enhancements are identified on
the plotting plan. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to
be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans.
Landscaping
The original landscape plan featured a typical collection of trees, shrubs and ground cover plant
materials. This modification proposes additions of unique plant materials and the addition of
key plant sizes and materials in prominent areas to create a specific community character. The
landscape methodology and materials that attempt to achieve this character are defined below:
Vineyard: Grape vines are proposed at the community entrance at Walcott Lane. It is
this unique application of plant material, in combination with the residential architecture,
which is intended to establish the 'vineyard' character. The grape vines will be planted
on both sides of the community entry drive (Seville Street), with the majority to be
located on the south side, adjacent to the community trail.
Street trees: Street character for the community is proposed to be unified using two (2)
alternating tree species (Southern Live Oak and Yellow Oleander) as opposed to a
different species for each street. The central round -a -bout will add a unique species
(Strawberry Tree) in the parkway area surrounding the drive. Additionally, the central
round -a -bout and cul-de-sacs will attempt to create prominent focal points by utilizing
single, large box, multi -trunk trees, as opposed to multiple small box trees.
Slopes: The plant pallet for the open space slopes will remain the same; however
erosion control for these areas will be elevated through greater densities of plantings
and groupings of species.
Aside from elevated erosion control measures, these modifications to the landscape plan are
intended to unify the overall landscape plan, as well as establish the 'vineyard' character.
G:\PLANNING\2014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx
3
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on July 24, 2014 and mailed to
the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs
and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a
negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have
been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one.
An Initial Study was originally prepared and distributed for public review on August 8, 2011. As
a result of the findings in the Initial Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and
adopted on January 24, 2012. Therefore the proposed project has been deemed to be exempt
from further environmental review.
FINDINGS
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with the General Plan with the changes
proposed by the Modification. The General Plan has listed the proposed project as a
compatible use within Low density residential zoning areas, and the project is in conformance
with other Ordinances of the City and State law.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety,
and general welfare.
As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines,
standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be constructed and function in
a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. In
addition, the project was reviewed by a variety of external government agencies as part of the
original Initial Study process to further ensure the project was designed and appropriately
conditioned so that it would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare.
None of the revisions proposed by the Modification Application are anticipated to have an
adverse impact to the original Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project.
ATTACHMENTS
Aerial Map
Plan Reductions
Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Original Initial Study
Original Mitigation Monitoring Program
Notice of Public Hearing
G1PLANNINGQ014TA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\Staff Report.docx
4
AERIAL MAP
City of Temecula PA14-0053
250
Soo
■ Feet
eon,..is map was made by me GMorleme<vl t Geographic d.C..linfamna.on .-an
ilThmapa parwas ma rtpn aero ofTerno lUYeo RrveraEe Cnonq A"n"me
oepvlmenr and The Tr.nwonai on.nd Lana Manapemmr All of Flvernae
NORTH
Col Tl,e Gilt' ar Tein.<W....ume. rq w.R. my M legal Pidson and""in'
nrumanm -nanM an hi. mq otl..nd inrarmeoan repreaenmd on Ins map
onre<r to update end moM1M.on The Geog'a Inbrmslcn S m and
omer aou¢ea MwM he awnea Im In. most mnenunbrmawo
That m.p i. not rt' ......l.
Geographic Inlo.nwtwn
Systeme
PLAN REDUCTIONS
PLAN ) F. AN I PLAN 1 PLAN J
STREET SCENE
THE VINEYARD
rLnlc m. uLnoP xi.
F A F N C H COT TA GF
5FAN15H
PLAN I
FRONT ELEVATIONS
ANDALUSIAN
.1 w 11
_ THE VINEYARD ' — 8uwnien lepanl
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
• ' ' u� wu
OPT. SL. DR.
OPT. STACKING. DR.
Mr4woI►IamaINK63il
45.00'
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN I
REFLECTS SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
OPT. KITCHEN ISLAND
OPT. DECK
OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
PLAN I
IMM FT
TmG Lw0 R
14FDROOFEi 1S4wTNfl LOR
FLOOR AREA TABLE
1st noon Fm sp R.
2ND ilogl
TOTK 21M N. R.
b CM GNUGE IIS �. R.
Wl ULIFOIINM RDOif H6 fp. R.
n .R.
ON al H
Baawnian i Lapani
sal uni
LEFT
RIGHT
PLAN I
SPANISH
FRONT A
ROOF PLAN A
T H E VINEYARD Bassanian Lagoni
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
Sli I)311
la ROOM
M1Rs111 -VII. VRM1
REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
REAR - OF7 DECK -
OPTIONS
PLAN I
SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
ROOF RAN .—..— A
wt
ROOF FIANs.... A
lf��Y.0O�p1N
i;94;'.13
m
BFFMIFINn UVW
xvra_�—z�
nI Inu
45.00'
SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
PLAN I
•,,,,,,,,,,.,, REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
PLAN 1
z>w 3050. f,.
TmG Zw SO Ff
I BEDRO 13.5 Mh SI LOFT
BOOR AREA TABLE
IIT fLDOR 1.2x950. FT.
3NDfLooR ISIS SO.fi.
TOTK 3294 50. R.
2 -CM GIM!.E 415W
Ort. CPLiORfNR RDDM Ifs W.
as 02 H
Bamnian i Lagm
ul i3n3
FT.
as 02 H
Bamnian i Lagm
ul i3n3
PLAN I
FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
ROOF PLAN B
BassenianLagoni
�svi uei��
RIGHT - OPT. DECK
pow
REAR -OFT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
REAR - OPT. DECK
OPTIONS
PLAN I
FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
r___________
___________
r
1
ROOF PLAN.—...w. B
ROOF PLAN a
OPT. DECK
of o� n
Buaanian Loom
inr ring
SECOND FLOOR
l�
45.00'
PLAN I
REFLECTS ANDALUSIAN
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
Lmw"
TmG .Lw S0."
� RmRDarrs I s s uTw I Lan
FLOOR AREA TABLE
IST FLOOR IDS W. FT
MD ROOK ISISw FT.
TOTK Lmso FT.
i. CIJtGMAGF 41IM"
OIT CM1f Rw ROOK ISsS "
BRnenien ! Leponl
ul um
ml
LEFT
PLAN I
ANDALUSIAN
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
ROOF PLAN D
as 02 is
Bnunim leymi
niinss
ILA ROOM
RIGHT -OFT. DECK
q
REAR -OPT CALIFORNIA ROOM
nFillill
REAR OPT. DECK
OPTIONS
PLAN I
ANDALUSIAN
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
ROOF PLAN,— D
4 1 1 A
W 7
ROOF PLAN •a m D
0". DECK
BRssenlan LRpai
FRENCH COTTAGE
SPANISH
MONTEREY
PLAN 2
FRONT ELEVATIONS
os w ,.
THE VINEYARD Bun
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA ,tl, _
4 BB'
SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 2
REF LEC T5 SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
OPT. BEDROOM S ) BA 5 & EXP. BED 2
zw sD rt
TMG I.WOW FT
4 YDROOMS r s S MTM I SO SA.
OIT OED SIOIT YMGIIUiIONI
Ort CRAFTS
l MY OMK.E
FLOOR AREA TABLE
IST FLO
I.SN w FT
}ND FLOOR
I.iH SO FT
TOTN
2NOSO FT
l -M1 GNUf1
$10 SO.R
OR (wllFplNi Al
202W iT
RaloF
>. so FT
os 03 IS
BneBnun Ligon
:xats-
i21 uiu
OPT. STACKING DR.
OPT. SL. DR.
NMI
OPT. DECK
OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
PLAN 2
OPTIONS
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
OPT. KRCNEN ISLAND
OPT. HOME MANAGEMENT
w Juwnw✓w nqn
as of i.
Basseman Lagom
7.7'lll
fit
LEFT
tY --------'°"
RIGHT
PLAN 2
SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FRONT A
ROOF PLAN A
05.01 u
Bnawnien 1(apnn
5]1 15155
[orm
willi1�7,
ROOF PLANA
ROOF PLAN A
11
RKiHT • OFT. DECK
Ev,
I]i�.ESiR.:i.i3
OPTIONS
PLAN 2
SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
7
LEFT • OFT. DECK
.1 .2 1.
9nminn LogoN
saii>>i
SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 2
REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
OPT. BEDROOM 5 / BA. 5l EXP. BED 1
777F
u sq "
TMGET. )AOD W R
� ffdlOOMi��.f Mll6/ WH61100111
OIf {1E0 fIOI! II�OU\ICN/
CM C1VJR
1 MT GNULE
FLOOR AREA TABLE
=mff
DL ROCU
sQ FT
slamI-MTLr1Mff fT
art GLL/W�N BOO11
=S.
O
mm
M .RFT
m
os of is
Bassaman Lagoni
oil
m
REAR
LEFT
.sow
FRONT B
ROOF PLAN B
RIGHT
PLAN 2
FRENCH COTTAGE
as02 n
THE VINEYARD
BusBnim.layoni
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
...w`.
$ii 11233
ROOF PLAN..-. B
ROOF PLAN een elc B
OPT. DKK
Inaer.�m
M E N
O ■ E
REAR - OPT. DKK
OPTIONS
PLAN 2
FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
ROOM
LEFT - OPT. DKK
05 02 14
Bannnian 1 lagord
s. ..
5 71 11155
SECOND FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 2
REFLECTS MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
OPT. BEDROOM S / BATH S / EXP. BEE
:Wdal
1YO W. n
TARGET 1.W0 W FT.
R OEDROOMS i AS OATHS S WWW
A0 I
OR. OED. S 1 OIT NIRWNATpN
o" OUFTS
1-MYG E
FLOOR AREA TABLE
1STFLO
11H W.fT.
mo ROOK
104 W. ff
Toru
i Kmlff
3-lAYG f
510W."
0 O RN ROOM
2115Q.FT.
o
"SQ."
05 02 14
Bassanim i laBDni
7-1 77, —1
mom OEM
REAR
i7i7mm 1 1
0
RIGHT
PLAN 2
MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
ROOF PLAN C
05.02 1.
Besaanianilagani
spy
ni.rom
ROOF PLANa.-.m. C
ROOF PLAN.o..m
Off. DECK
+� La""YY�YAfYYY f
Fell. }
s■lUff I I of t I
REAR -OPr. DECK 11.) LEFT - OPT. DECK
OPTIONS
PLAN 2
MONTEREY
os o� is
THE VINEYARD
Baaanian ia9ai
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
;:;;�•�•p.'Y.�
u�isiu
ROOF PIAN A
w"drniwnaysrn.iu ..
ROOF PLAN B
PL■
RIGHT - OFT. BEDROOM S
MGNT -OPT. BEDROOM S
OPTIONS
PLAN 2
THE VINEYARD
LEMECVLA. CALIFORNIA
7
e
ML
Basminn i lagmi
sL nn�
FRENCH COTTAGE
SPANISH
MONTEREY
PLAN 3
FRONT ELEVATIONS
as al 1,
THE VINEYARD Bnssanian Le WI
TEM ECULA, CALIFORNIA
311.13111
SECOND FLOOR
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN 3
REFLECTS SPANISH
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
PLAN 3
3.0" SQ. ET.
TARGET'. 3.150 SQ. FT
4 BEDROOMSI IS MTM I BONUS ROOM I
OPT. BED S W/ M S / OPT. IMAGINATION I
OPT SURE/ OPS. PA RY 3
5.BATG E
FLOOR AREA TABLE
ISTFLOOR JEWSQ.FT.
MO ROOK 1.3195Q. FT.
TOTAL 1A395Q. R.
3. MY GARAGE sn W.
OPI.G FORNN ROOM mmI FT
OPT. MASTER BEDROOM SURE 1 • 1535Q. FT.
SWE 153 .FT.
05.03.11
Bassenian i lagoni
331.11333
OPT. DECK
..rnrwawm�
OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
--------------------------
OPT. 16080 STACKING DR,
OPT. DKK
OPT. CAUFORNLA ROOM
OPT. PANTRY 2
n W axwnnw..o
OPT. IMAGINATION RM.
PLAN 3
OPTIONS
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
SUITE OPT. MASTER BEDROOM SUITE 2
01 02 14
Bmaninn I Lapmd
5 1. 1233
a
REAR
--------A- ml---- --- I ----
IN
� -------------- I ------- ��-----
FRONT A
ROOF PUN A
PLAN 3
1-4--- SPANISH
os os n
_ THE VINEYARD
8aasenion i LagoW
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA������������
ROOF PLAN .w -.mn A
ROOF PLAN.-. A
- OPT. DKK
OPTIONS
PLAN 3
SPANISH
LEFT - OPT. DKK
THE VINEYARD Bes1...1 .11.-
.«� TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA i%. iW, r..m
ni
. s
xi.unIM)
1C/
5n I >i
WI F_
�I
Y1�
T
4S.O B'
SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3 FIRST FLOOR
REFLECTS FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
;e_cr
;an w FT
TMG" 3.1"W fT
41FOIIO )UMTMIg ROOl11
WT. m 5 WI M 51 WT M1If.RNTION i
O SYIFIO FMTRYl
).MYu
FLOOR AREA TABLE
I5TR0011 I SO.fT.
S ftR 171,
TOTAL 5.0T 5O. FT.
)•MYGMM'2 57SS R.
OR. CALfOItSM ROOM mm FT
OR IM5Tn1F®IIOOM SUTF I •1575O.R.
57 soFT.
of o5 1R
Bnseenien i Logmi
i)1 nin
�ItiVARA'PYA11WtlSAYRfAfAiRIMIdJIGIWINrtIMA9lC'� ^R/IY#A7liuRYdA'R7r'i1Y�1Yi
I
v srw v�v�lv�lrV v�vgyvVv7vyv v+_ ry ,,r,j,l
1 .+VI lV+ �IV+ ;r �r
ti� A. ;II��I. ■ ■ 11
RIGHT PLAN 3
IL FRENCH COTTAGE
_ THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
FRONT 6
ROOF PLAN B
psa�
4'S i
raa,�
OS 02 11
6uaninn Lllgolli
fll 13111
ME
i D
ROOF PLAN•an., e
1
IGHT - OFT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
poiloweva
"1I
GHT
- OPT. DECK
REAR - OPT. DKK
OPTIONS
PLAN 3
FRENCH COTTAGE
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
IIIIII�IDIIIIIIIIIIIiIIIC
LEFT - OFT. DECK
Bassenian Lagm!
sti n>>7
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN 3
REFLECTS MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FIRST FLOOR
).0), SO. R.
TMGFT 1,1 W fp R
♦ I®ROOITS � � S NTMr pNyi AOOHr
OI] IRl S wr N S � Ort R1/GIW.TION I
OM fU}EIOrt 1MITRTI
L NTGMWE
FLOOR AREA TABLE
IST ROOF
::7
.SQ.R
]W ROOR 'An Sp. FT.
IAH
TOTK Sp.
L NT GMAIi
'75 SO. R.
Ort CAW014N ROOM HO Sp_fT.
OM ]W]9111OIlOOM SUOE3 •If]Sp. R.
• If] FT
B83ueRieR Lopmi
u i nin
N
==._
'Ile
lint
Idi�:R
it^la
111111
F�
ILI® .
111111
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN 3
REFLECTS MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FIRST FLOOR
).0), SO. R.
TMGFT 1,1 W fp R
♦ I®ROOITS � � S NTMr pNyi AOOHr
OI] IRl S wr N S � Ort R1/GIW.TION I
OM fU}EIOrt 1MITRTI
L NTGMWE
FLOOR AREA TABLE
IST ROOF
::7
.SQ.R
]W ROOR 'An Sp. FT.
IAH
TOTK Sp.
L NT GMAIi
'75 SO. R.
Ort CAW014N ROOM HO Sp_fT.
OM ]W]9111OIlOOM SUOE3 •If]Sp. R.
• If] FT
B83ueRieR Lopmi
u i nin
REAR
LEFT
RIGHT
I
PLAN 3
MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA
FROM C
—11
.aor�w.�w,n.�u.n. C
os 01.14
BR nian lagori
1
------------
R�OOF PLAN^a w m. C
nmeraxu
t
� � 1
RIGHT -OPT CALIFORNIA ROOM
REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
AFAR - OPT. DKK
OPTIONS
PLAN 3
MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
V
LEFT - OPT. DECK
I�
ew�ninnilspail
RIGHT - OPT. DECK
REAR - OPT. CALIFORNIA ROOM
AFAR - OPT. DKK
OPTIONS
PLAN 3
MONTEREY
THE VINEYARD
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
V
LEFT - OPT. DECK
I�
ew�ninnilspail
PLANTING LEGEND:
vaR rr mops wms
nrl
�e�eoaiM��n�-
BnBM
1Mkl
Y6JIQLlY[
PRELIMINARY LANDSCP
THE VINEYARD - TRACT 36295
CITY OF TEMECULA �p
PC RESOLUTION
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA14-0053, A MAJOR MODIFICATION
APPLICATION TO ALLOW VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT
TO REVISE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PRODUCT
TYPE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR WALCOTT
ESTATES, GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF
BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD, EAST OF WALCOTT
LANE, NORTH OF LA SERENA WAY AND SOUTH OF
CALLE CHAPOS (APNS: 957-170-032 THROUGH 036)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On November 16, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended
approval to City Council of Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map,
PA10-0146, Home Product Review, PA10-0147, Zone Change to PDO, and PA10-
0148, General Plan Amendment.
B. On January 10, 2012, the City Council approved Planning Application
Nos. PA10-0145, Tentative Tract Map, PA10-0146, Home Product Review, PA10-0147,
Zone Change to PDO, and PA10-0148, General Plan Amendment.
C. On March 11, 2014 the applicant filed Planning Application No. PA14-
0053, a Major Modification Application to PA10-0146, Home Product Review, in a
manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
D. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
E. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on August 6, 2014, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
F. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application
No. PA14-0053 subject to, and based upon, the findings set forth hereunder.
G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Modifications, Development Code Section 17.05.030.E
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City;
As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with the General Plan with the
changes proposed by the Modification. The General Plan has listed the
proposed project as a compatible use within Low Density Residential zoning
areas, and the project is in conformance with other Ordinances of the City and
State law.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
As conditioned, the project will remain consistent with all applicable policies,
guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the project will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare. In addition, the project was reviewed by a
variety of external government agencies as part of the original Initial Study
process to further ensure the project was designed and appropriately conditioned
so that it would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general
welfare. None of the revisions proposed by the Modification Application are
anticipated to have an adverse impact to the original Mitigated Negative
Declaration prepared for the project.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Modification Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section
15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification
of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial
importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or
further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. Therefore the proposed
project has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review;
An Initial Study was originally prepared for the project which was distributed and
made available for public review on August 8, 2011. As a result of the Initial
Study, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and adopted on January
24, 2012.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA14-0053, A Modification application to allow Van
Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan
for Walcott Estates, generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott
Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APN: 957-170-032 through
036) subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 6`h day of August, 2014.
Stanley Harter, Chairman
ATTEST:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 6th day of August, 2014, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
/1 umkNiziA1iI►IiarevieumIIiI&*mreikNmmi
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA14-0053
Project Description: Planning Application No. PA14-0053, a Major Modification
application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the
previously approved product type and landscape plan (PA10-
0146) for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates), generally located west
of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La
Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos
Assessor's Parcel No.:
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Quimby Category:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
General Requirements
957-170-032, -033, -034, -035, and -036
Single -Family Residential (less than 8 du/ac)
Residential - Detached
Single -Family Residential
Single -Family with Attached Garage
August 6, 2014
August 6, 2016
PL -1. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to
this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend
the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims,
actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside,
annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in
furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed
for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants,
contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant
and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is
applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City
reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
PL -2. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any
modifications or revisions,to the approval of this project.
PL -3. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of
substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period,
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a
Conditional Use Permit.
PL -4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application
being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3
one-year extensions of time, one year at a time.
PL -5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall
substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with
the Planning Division.
PL -6. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously
maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property
owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
PL -7. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for
permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color
and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color
and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL -8. Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of
Operations dated March 10, 2014, on file with the Planning Division, unless
superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
PL -9. Class I Multi -Use Trails. Class I multi -use trails shall be provided as per the City of
Temecula's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for
the Class 1 trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and
constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping.
PL -10. Compliance. This application must comply with the Conditions of Approval for
PA10-0146, unless otherwise modified by this approval.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL -11. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction
Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the
building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location,
number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container
size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water
Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the
City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved
Grading Plan.
PL -12. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a
note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will
be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that
irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any
adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and
will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check
will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly,
and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved
construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape
maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The
applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
PL -13. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
on the plans stating, 'The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils
report at the first irrigation inspection."
PL -14. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include
water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in
accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo)
factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget.
PL -15. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance
program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to
assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL -16. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape
maintenance program shall indicate, 'Three landscape site inspections are required.
The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are
open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications
and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be
addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a
mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two
hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation
systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed
consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will
verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape
maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to
schedule inspections.
PL -17. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped
areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the
public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and
slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls
adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping
excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but
may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas).
PL -18. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails
within private common areas.
PL -19. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape
construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate
screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required
by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order
to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan
planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure
that there are no conflicts with trees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit.
PL -20. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved
construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL -21. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within
individual lots shall be completed for inspection.
PL -22. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be
completed for inspection prior to issuance of the certificate occupancy permit.
PL -23. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those
lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area.
PL -24. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by
the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the
plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation
plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final
Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system
have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community
Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL -25. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be
complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Conditions
B-1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be
addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for
review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building
Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan
submittal.
B-2. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable
provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical
Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013
California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title
24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code.
B-3. Green Measures. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on
the project, as stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards.
B-4. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access
provisions and building setbacks on plans to include:
a. All ground floor units to be adaptable.
b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
e. Path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as club
house, trash enclosure, tot lots and picnic areas.
B-5. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of
plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County
of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light
pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be
hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-
way.
B-6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed
buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial
or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family
residential projects.
B-7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley
School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure
the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
B-8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and
permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
B-9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light
standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.
B-10. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits.
B-11. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require
separate approvals and permits
B-12. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the
project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula
Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied
residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from
7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized
Government Holidays.
B-13. Trail Accessibility. The community trail must be designed for ADA accessibility per
CBC 11 B-256/7 trails and paths.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
F-1. Minimum Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire
flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix
B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering
2,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 2 -hour duration (CFC
Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance).
F-2. Minimum Fire Hydrant Distance. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set
minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. A combination of on-site and
offsite 6" x 4" x 2-2 '/z" outlets on a looped system shall be located on fire access
roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at
each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the
street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire
flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrants in the system (CFC Appendix C
and Temecula City Ordinance).
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
F-3. Maximum Cul -De -Sac Length. Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320
feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet (CFC Chapter 5
along with Temecula City Ordinance).
F-4. All -Weather Access. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and
maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a
surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs.
GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section
1410.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built
shall have fire apparatus access roads (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance).
F-5. Access Roads. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed
width of not less than 24 feet unobstructed and an unobstructed vertical clearance
of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance).
F-6. Minimum Access Width at Gated Entries. Where there is a gated entry with
. median, the minimum required access width on each side of the median is 16 -feet.
F-7. Minimum Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, one point
of access will be for emergency vehicles only and will have a Knox rapid entry
system. Roads shall be via all-weather surface, as approved by the Fire Prevention
Bureau. All gates shall have a Knox rapid entry system (CFC Chapter 5).
F-8. Dead End Streets. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which
have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire
apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance).
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
F-9. Water System Plans. The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system
plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private
water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a
registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block,
and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards.
Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire
flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be
submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 14 and
Chapter 5).
F-10. Residential Automatic Fire Sprinkler System. The homes will be required to be
equipped with a residential automatic fire sprinkler system per the California
Residential Code, Chapter 3. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire
Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by
the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be
submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
F-11. Fire Hydrant Locations. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of
reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F-12. Building Address Numbers. New buildings shall have approved address numbers,
building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is
plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These
numbers shall contrast with their background. Single-family residences and multi-
family residential units shall have 4 -inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the
Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5)
F-13. Knox Rapid Entry System. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire
Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access
shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by
firefighting personnel. (CFC Chapter 5)
F-14. Fire Lane Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for
approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or
signs. (CFC Chapter 5)
ORIGINAL INITIAL STUDY
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Environmental Checklist
Project Title
Walcott Estates
Lead Agency Name and Address
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number
Matt Peters, Associate Planner
951 694-6408
Project Location
The project site is located east of Walcott Lane, approximately 1,500
feet north of La Serena and 1,100 feet south of Calle Cha os.
Project Sponsor's Name and Address
Steve Galvez
Walcott Investments, LLC
31938 Temecula Pkwy Suite A369
Temecula, CA 92592
General Plan Designation
VL-VerV Low Density Residential
Zoning
VL -Very Low Density Residential
Description of Project
Planning Application No. PA10-0145, a Tentative Tract Map (No.
36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single-family cluster lots.
Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 4,500 square feet.
Approximately 10 acres of the site will be preserved as permanent
open space to preserve the existing drainage on-site. Access to the
site will be provided from Walcott Lane. The future extension of
Butterfield Stage Road will have restricted (gated), emergency
access only. (Associated applications: PA10-0146, Home Product
Review; PA10-0147, Zone Change for PDO; and PA10.0148,
General Plan Amendment for PDO/cluster development).
Planning Application No. PA10-0146, a Residential Home Product
review for 45 lots to be created with TTM 36295 (PA10-0145) for
three floor plans ranging in size from 2,235 to 2,956 square feet with
three elevation types each - Craftsman, Spanish and Tuscan.
Planning Application No. PA10-0147, a Zoning Map and Text change
from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development
Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density
residential designation with provisions for a cluster development.
Planning Application No. PA10-0148, a General Plan Land Use map
change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density
residential.
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
The subject property is a vacant hillside and valley. Property to the
south consists of single family residential development at a LM -Low
Medium Density, while properties to the east, west and north are
developed at L -Low Density. Slightly farther to the north is the future
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which will contain up to 2,015
residential units. The subject property is in an area that transitions
between high and low density residential developments.
Other public agencies whose approval
None
is required
Vicinity Map
PA104145 t
J �r!
//'-
.:\0 500 LODU 2,000 'l `•,r�\�7r
2
i
City of Temecula
Community Development
Planning Division Notice of Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
PROJECT: Walcott Estates (Planning Application Nos. PA10-0145, PA10-0146, PA10-
0147 and PA10-0148
APPLICANT: Steve Galvez, Walcott Investments, LLC
LOCATION: Located east of Walcott Lane, approximately 1,500 feet north of La Serena and
1,100 feet south of Calle Chapos in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside
DESCRIPTION: A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36295) to subdivide 25 acres into 45 single-family
cluster lots, a Residential Home Product Review for 45 lots, a Zoning Map and
text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development
Overlay (PDO), and a General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL)
density residential to Low (L) density residential
The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project described
above. Based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); it has been determined that this
project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As
a result, the Planning Commission intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project.
The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment
are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program which will be included as
part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project.
The Comment Period for this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration is August 8, 2011 to
September 7, 2011. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the
contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA
92589-9033. City Hall is located at 41000 Main Street.
The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through:
®The Local Newspaper ®Posting the Site ®Notice to Adjacent Property Owners
If you need additional information or have any questions concerning this project, please contact Matt
Peters, AICP at (9,511) 694-6408.
Prepared by: Nl 8 ! I / I f — A4 5oc kfc At" A'4,—
(Sign tune) (Title)
1. AESTHETICS. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Signifkanl
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
X
b
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
X
c
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
of the site and its surroundings?
X
d
Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
X
Comments:
1.a. No Impact: There are no designated scenic vistas affected by the project. The Community Design
Element of the City of Temecula's General Plan identifies important scenic viewsheds to ensure that all new
public and private development projects will not obstruct the public views of scenic resources. According to the
General Plan exhibit on page CD -5, the subject property has not been identified as a scenic vista or viewshed.
No impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.
1.b. No Impact: The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is a vacant hillside
and valley, however no trees, rock outcroppings or historic buildings will be affected by the proposed project.
As addressed above in Section 1.a. and according to the General Plan, the project site contains no scenic
vistas or viewsheds. No impact is anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
1.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is located on a vacant hillside and valley
between Walcott Lane (2 -lane local) to the west and a future extension of Butterfield Stage Road (four -lane
divided major arterial) to the east. Existing residential development is located immediately the south of the
property and future Roripaugh Ranch is farther to the north. Roripaugh Ranch will eventually contain up to
2,015 residential units. The project is part of a developing valley and provides a transition between existing
and future residential developments by clustering development on approximately 15 acres and preserving
approximately 10 acres of open space. The open space will be adjacent to the existing residential to the south
providing an adequate buffer between the existing and proposed development. The project will contain 45
single-family residential units consisting of three different floor plans and three different architectural styles,
including Spanish, Tuscan and Craftsman. The homes will contain significant articulation and massing, varied
rooflines and architectural specific details and materials. The project also contains significant landscaping,
trails, and rural three -rail fencing with stone pilaster details. The project was designed to preserve open space
and compliment surrounding residential development. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of
the project.
1.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources of light or
glare. Future development on the project site will introduce new generators of light and glare typically
associated with residential development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with
the Mount Palomar Lighting Ordinance (Ordinance 655). This ordinance requires lighting to be shielded,
directed down to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky. Lighting issues
are addressed during the City's plan review and inspection process. A less than significant impact is
anticipated as a result of the project.
2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California
Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California
Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use In assessing impacts on agriculture and
farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest
land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment
Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:
Less Than
Poterialty
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Infannation Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
Na
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to
non-agricultural use?
X
b
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
X
c
Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest
land (as defined in Public Resources Code section
12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources
Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section
51104(g)?
X
d
Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land
to non ores use
X
e
Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest
land to non -forest use?
X
Comments:
2.a.c.d.e. No impact: According to the City of Temecula General Plan, the project site does not contain and
will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural
use. Forest and/or Timberland do not exist on the property or in the surrounding area. Property to the south
contains existing single-family dwellings, while the property to the north contains a small amount of grapevines,
and farther to the north there is a "pick your own" blueberry farm. However, the property is zoned VL -Very Low
Density Residential and was never intended for agricultural or foresting purposes. Therefore, the construction
of the project will not have any impacts to these types of farmland or forest resources.
2.b. No Impact: The project site does not have an agricultural zoning designation by the City of Temecula,
and the site is not regulated by a Williamson Act contract. Consequently, there are no impacts related to this
issue.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the
following determinations. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan?
X
b
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
X
c
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceedquantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
I X
d
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
X
e
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people?
X
Comments:
3.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech
Consulting Group, "Based on the air quality emissions modeling contained in this report, with the
implementation of identified mitigation measures the air emissions associated with this proposed project would
be below the applicable thresholds of significance consistent with SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan."
The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact.
3.c. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study by Entech
Consulting Group, "The operational impact analysis is based on cumulative traffic conditions in the project
area. As shown in that analysis, the proposed project would not result in violations of the state or federal
ambient air quality standards. The proposed project would be consistent with the SCAQMD's AQMP, which is
the long range air quality planning document. Thus, the proposed project would have a less than significant
impact on cumulative regional and local air quality." Furthermore, it is stated, "After a detailed analysis, it has
been determined that no significant impacts will be created from the construction and operation of the
proposed project, thus no mitigation measures are required." The project is anticipated to have a less than
significant impact.
3.d. Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated: According to the City of Temecula
General Plan, as defined in figure AQ -2 of the General Plan, there no known sensitive receptors (hospitals,
schools, libraries, child care centers, and adult -assisted care facilities) that would be exposed to substantial
pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD), however, classifies the surrounding residences as sensitive receptors. The surrounding
residences may be exposed to some pollutant concentrations on a short-term basis during construction and
grading activities. With the implementation of the mitigation measures identified below, these impacts will be
reduced to a less than significant level.
Mitigation Measure Air Quality 1:
• Water exposed surfaces three times daily but prevent tracking of mud from exiting the construction site
or from reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the site
• Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas.
• Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
• Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas.
• Sweep any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible dirt deposition on any public roadway.
• Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material.
• Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph.
• Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to remain inactive for than 96 hours after
clearing is completed.
• Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected from erosion.
• Require the construction contractor to ensure that all construction equipment is maintained in peak
working order.
• Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment.
• Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods.
• Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways.
• Wet down or cover dirt haul routed but, prevent tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or
from reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the site.
• Sweep access points daily.
• Implement erosion controls throughout the construction site
3.e. Less Than Significant Impact: Development of the project will not create any considerably
objectionable odors that will affect a substantial number of people in the surrounding community. In
considering the scope of the project and the fact that construction activities will occur on a temporary basis, the
impact is anticipated to be less than significant.
7
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
X
b
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
X
c
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
X
d
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
X
e
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
X
f
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation Ian?
X
Comments: Approximately 10 acres of the 22 acre (net) site will be permanently preserved as natural open
space. No changes or modifications are proposed to the blue line stream or surrounding area.
4.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project site has the potential to contain
fairy shrimp and to affect federally protected wetlands, and has the potential to contain Burrowing Owl and
nesting bird habitat. Therefore, the following mitigation measures were included in the, "Biological Resource
Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis Report' prepared by ECORP
Consulting:
Mitigation Measure Bio 1:
Pool features on the site should be inspected for fairy shrimp during the rainy season. If ponds are confirmed
to be capable of supporting fairy shrimp, then focused fairy shrimp surveys by a qualified biologist are
recommended.
Mitigation Measure Bio 2:
Pursuant to MSHCP guidelines, a pre -construction survey for burrowing owl within 30 days prior to ground
disturbance is required.
Mitigation Measure Bio 3:
Pay Stephen's Kangaroo Rat fees
Mitigation Measure Bio 4:
Habitat clearing should avoid the migratory bird breeding season, which typically extends from March 1 to
August 15. If construction is to occur during the MBTA breeding season, a nesting bird survey should be
conducted by a qualified biologist.
4.e. Less Than Significant Impact: There are no trees or other biological resources that will be impacted
or conflict with any policies or ordinances. A less than significant impact is anticipated.
4.f. Less Than Significant Impact: The report prepared by ECORP Consulting included an MSHCP
Consistency Analysis. The project has been reviewed and includes mitigation consistent with MSHCP. As a
result the project will not conflict with the provisions of the MSHCP and a less than significant impact is
anticipated.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Less Than
Polentlally
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
X
b
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
X
c
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
X
d
Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
X
Comments:
5.a. -d. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The City of Temecula General Plan does not
identify the subject parcel as a sensitive archeological resource area; however the subject parcel is identified
as being in a highly sensitive paleontological area. A cultural resources report on the subject property was
provided by the applicant entitled "A Cultural Resources Survey of the Karen Lynn Lane Project, Temecula
California" prepared by Brian F. Smith and Associates. The report concluded that no cultural or archaeological
remains were found within the subject property boundaries, but recommended if any remains were exposed
during development, the area should be re-evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. While the likelihood of
encountering any cultural resources is low, there is potential, as'with any project involving earth moving
activities, to uncover unknown subsurface cultural resources. Therefore, the project will be conditioned that if,
during construction, cultural resources are encountered, work should be halted or diverted in the immediate
area while a qualified archaeologist evaluates the finds and makes recommendations. In addition, mitigation
has been provided below:
Mitigation Measure CultRes 1: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a
Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -disturbing activities in an effort to
identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be
subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant
shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the monitoring program, and to
coordinate with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring
Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation,
responsibilities, and participation of Native American Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground
disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and
treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the
site.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 3: Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a
pre -grading report with the City (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity
observation. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be
present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement
required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in
consultation with the appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources
discovered on the property. Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and
groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in
consultation with the project archaeologist.
10
Mitigation Measure CultRes 4: If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code
Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the
necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b)
remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition
has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native
American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage
Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the
discovery. The most likely descendants) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in
consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the
Treatment Agreement described in MM 2.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 5: The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including
sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate
Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be
avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are
discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance
of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif.
Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources.
If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for
such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director
shall make the detennination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect
to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the
Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be
appealable to the Planning Commission and/or City Council.
11
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Sgnlfcanl With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting lnformadon Sources
Significant
Mitigation
significant
No
Impact
incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i.
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
X
ii
Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
iii
Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
X
iv
Landslides?
X
b
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
X
c
Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
X
d
Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks
to life or property?
X
e
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
X
Comments:
6.a.i.ii.iii.c.d. Less Than Significant Impact: The subject property is not located on a fault line or fault zone.
Soil liquefaction is caused by the loss of soil strength, which is a result of increased pore water pressures
related to significant seismic activity. This phenomenon occurs primarily in loose to somewhat dense
cohesion -less soils, which are located within a groundwater zone. When seismic shaking occurs a
rearrangement of the soil particles take place, putting them into a denser condition, which results in the
localized settlement, sand toils and/or Flow failures. The subject property is located in a seismically active
area, as is the majority of southern California. The project has been reviewed and conditioned by the Building
and Safety Department to be constructed to the standards of the Uniform Building and Safety Code (UBSC).
As a result, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.
6.a.iv. Less Than Significant Impact: Landslide hazard areas are generally considered to exist when
substantial slopes are located on or immediately adjacent to a subject property. There are slopes located on
the project site, but none that could potentially create a hazard associated with landslides. The potential for
landslides to occur at the site is considered less than significant.
6.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The site may be susceptible to soil erosion during the short-term
construction activities. Short-term erosion effects during the construction phase of the project would be
prevented through implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is required in
accordance with the Countywide National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General
Construction Activities Permit. The SWPPP includes standard construction methods such as sandbags, silt
fencing, and temporary detention basins to control on-site and off-site erosion. Therefore, with implementation
of an approved SWPPP, impacts resulting from erosion during construction would be less than significant.
6.e. No Impact: The project will not require the use of septic tanks or other wastewater disposal systems.
12
7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Signiwnt Whh
Less Than
Issues and Suppoding Information Sources
SIgnlBcant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Inoo rated
Impact
Impact
a
Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
X
b
Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse
gases?
X
Comments:
Ta.b. Less Than Significant Impact: An air quality and greenhouse gas study was prepared by Entech
Consulting Group for this project. The report concluded that "The majority of GH emissions will result from
construction activities. Temporary GH emissions are expected to occur for the duration of the construction of
the proposed project. URBEMIS 2007 was utilized and emissions were estimated for each stage of the
construction schedule. Draft guidance from both the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)
and the County of San Diego Planning Department recommend amortizing construction estimates over a 30 -
year period to account for their contribution to project lifetime greenhouse gas emissions. Based on the
amortization over a 30 -year period, construction emissions would be estimated at 399 MT of CO2e per year,
which is below the 900 MT threshold suggested by CAPCOA as a screening threshold." As a result, impacts
from this project concerning greenhouse gas emissions are considered less than significant.
13
8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting trdonnstlon Soumes
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
X
b
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
X
c
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
X
d
Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
X
e
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
X
f
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
X
g
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation Ian?
X
IT
Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
X
Comments:
8.a. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transportation, use or disposal of hazardous materials. The proposed land use is a
residential development, which will not be routinely transporting, using or disposing hazardous materials.
8.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment. The proposed project is a residential development and will not emit hazardous materials
into the environment. In addition, the project will not require the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances and waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school.
8.d. No Impact: The proposed project will not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, will not create a significant
hazard to the public or the environment. The California Environmental Protection Agency lists Hazardous
Waste Substances Sites. The project site is not on the list, therefore no impact related to hazardous materials
posing a significant hazard to the public or environment will occur.
14
8.e.f. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public
airport, or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not create or result in a safety hazard for
people residing or working in the project area. No impact is anticipated.
8.g. No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area where it will impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is
anticipated as a result of the project.
8.h. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is not adjacent to a wildland area that would be
subject to fire hazards. Future development will comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes. A less
than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the project.
15
9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?
X
b
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
X
c
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner, which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
X
d
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
on- or off-site?
X
e
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted
runoff?
X
f
Require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP?
X
g
Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
X
h
Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which
would impede or redirect flood flows?
X
i
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
X
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
X
Comments:
9.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not violate water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements. The project is required to comply with all current soil erosion and national pollutant discharge
elimination system standards in effect at the time of grading permit issuance. As a condition of approval for
this project, the developer will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination Systems (NPDES) permit from the State Water Quality Resources Control Board. A less than
significant impact is anticipated.
9.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or
lowering of the local groundwater table level because the project design preserves approximately 10 acres of
16
open space containing the lowest elevations of the property and a blue line stream, which will allow for
sufficient groundwater re-charging. A less than significant impact is anticipated.
9.c. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of
the site or area. The blue line stream that runs through the southern half of the site will remain undisturbed
and be preserved as permanent open space. In addition, through the implementation of SWPPP (Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Program), erosion and siltation issues will be controlled to a less than significant impact
level and this project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off-site.
9.d.e.f. Less Than Signiflcant Impact: The project would increase runoff as a result of increasing the
impervious surface on the project site. The City imposes standard design criteria to detain surface runoff on
the property to ensure that the maximum runoff volume from the site is not significantly increased.
The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements established by the
State of California. However, the project is required to prepare a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
pursuant to the Municipal Separate Storm-Sewer Permit (MS4 Permit) issued by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB). A preliminary plan has been submitted and conceptually accepted and the project
will comply with RWQCB standards as designed.
Based upon the information presented above, the project would not substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Less than significant impacts are
anticipated.
9.g.h. No Impact: According to the City's General Plan, the project will not involve the placement of
residences or structures in a 100-year floodplain hazard area. The project is not within an area identified on
the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps for flooding. No significant flood hazards are
expected to occur from developing the project site as proposed, therefore no impact is anticipated.
9.i. No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. The subject
property is not located within a dam inundation area per the City's General Plan. No impacts are anticipated.
9.j. No Impact: Due to the project area's distance from the ocean and higher elevation, there is no
potential for a tsunami. The project area is not located near a large surface water body, and there is no
potential for inundation by seiche or mudflow due to the topography of the site.
17
10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Im t
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Physically divide an established community?
X
b
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
X
c
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
X
Comments:
10.a. No Impact: The project is located on vacant land that will not divide an established community.
10.b. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 45 new single-
family homes on 22 net acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO —
Planned Development Overlay. The net increase resulting from the zone change from VL — Very Low Density
Residential to L — Low Density Residential is 26 units, which is not considered substantial as evidenced by the
results of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project, which identified less than significant impacts and
no mitigation. The property is already zoned VL and was previously planned for residential development. The
proposed project is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition
between high and low-density development. The project site contains a dedicated road that is currently dirt
(undeveloped) and is used as a "cut -through" by people living east of the future extension of Butterfield Stage
Road. The project has residential development to the south and major roads on both sides (Walcott Lane to
the west and the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road to the east) of the property. Roads and other
infrastructure are available to the site and the project will not require major extensions of infrastructure that
could induce substantial population growth in the area. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of
this project.
10.c. No Impact: The project is consistent with the MSHCP and will not conflict with any habitat
conservation plan or natural community conservation plan (see discussion under "Biological Resources").
18
11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Then
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Im act
a
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
X
b
Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land use Ian?
I
X
Comments:
11.a.b. No Impact: The construction of this project on the proposed site is not anticipated to result in the loss
of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or to the residences of the State. According
to the General Plan, the State Division of Mines and Geology has prepared a mineral resources report entitled
Mineral Land Classification of the Temescal Valley Area, Riverside County, California, Special Report 165,
which evaluated mineral deposits within the Temecula Planning Area. According to the State Geologist, the
Temecula Planning Area was classed as a Mineral Resources Zone -3a (MRZ-3a), which determined that the
area contains sedimentary deposits which have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and
crushed stone for aggregate, however these areas are not considered to contain mineral resources of
significant economic value. The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to contain mineral
resources. No impacts are anticipated as result of this project.
19
12. NOISE. Would the project result in:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
X
b
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or groundbome noise levels?
X
c
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
X
d
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without theproject?
X
e
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
X
f
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
X
Comments:
12.a. -f. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: The project is anticipated to have
construction, operational, and traffic noise impacts that could expose people to noise, groundbome vibration,
and temporary periodic increase in ambient noise levels. To mitigate these potential impacts the following is
required as identified in the Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Kunzman Associates:
Mitigation Measure Noise 1(Construction):
A. The construction equipment staging and storage areas should be located as far from the residential
uses as possible.
B. All construction equipment should be properly maintained with operating mufflers and air intake
silencers as effective as those installed by the original manufacturer.
C. All construction activities should only take place between 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through
Saturday. No construction should take place on Sundays or nationally recognized holidays.
D. The contractor shall be restricted from playing loud music in the open construction area.
E. For the duration of construction activities, the construction manager shall serve as the contact person
should noise levels become disruptive to local residents. A sign should be posted at the project site
with the contact phone number.
Residents living within 1,000 feet from the existing property line should be provided with a construction
schedule. A timely notification should accompany any major changes to this schedule.
20
G. Additional noise attenuation methods should be utilized to reduce noise levels as much as possible.
These methods include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets and the construction of
temporary sound barriers between active construction areas and sensitive receptors. Any such barriers
should be constructed as close to the sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the greatest attenuation
effect.
Mitigation Measure Noise 2 (Operational):
A. In order to keep the nearest sensitive receptor from experiencing noise levels in excess of 65 dBA, the
proposed lift station must be constructed so that noise levels do not exceed 78 dBA at a distance of 10
feet.
Mitigation Measure Noise 3 (Traffic): Buildout traffic volumes will result in noise levels that exceed City
standards at the proposed single-family detached dwelling units. The following mitigation will be necessary to
reduce exterior and interior noise levels to an acceptable range.
A. Exterior - A noise barrier shall be built along the eastern edge of the property along Butterfield Stage
Road consistent with Figure 6 of the Kunzman Associates "Noise Impact Analysis" dated September,
2010, on file with the City of Temecula Planning Department.
B. Interior - All homes should implement mitigation measures to provide mechanical ventilation, double -
paned glass, and solid core doors with weather stripping and seals. The homes proposed within 300
feet along Butterfield Stage Road will require further attenuation, which includes stucco or brick exterior
siding with half inch thick fiberboard underlayer and interior and exterior walls should be attached by
resilient channels or have double walls, and that exterior construction materials have a sound
transmission class of 30 or greater.
12.e.f. No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan, within two miles of a public
airport, or within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The project will not expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels. No impact is anticipated.
21
13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Sgnifiwnt With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Signiflcant
No
Impact
incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
X
b
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
X
elsewhere?
c
Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
X
Comments:
13.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will result in the development of 45 new single-
family homes on 22 net acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO —
Planned Development Overlay. The net increase resulting from the zone change from VL — Very Low Density
Residential to L — Low Density Residential is 26 units, which is not considered substantial as evidenced by the
results of the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for this project, which identified less than significant impacts and
no mitigation. The property is already zoned VL and was previously planned for residential development. The
proposed project is designed as a cluster development to preserve open space and provide a transition
between high and low-density development. The project site contains a dedicated road that is currently dirt
(undeveloped) and is used as a "cut -through' by people living east of the future extension of Butterfield Stage
Road. The project has residential development to the south and major roads on both sides (Walcott Lane to
the west and the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road to the east) of the property. Roads and other
infrastructure are available to the site and the project will not require major extensions of infrastructure that
could induce substantial population growth in the area. A less than significant impact is anticipated as result of
this project.
13.b.c. No Impact: The proposed project site is currently vacant and will not displace housing or people
necessitating the need for replacement housing elsewhere. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a
result of this project.
FY:
14. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Im act
a Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
X
Policeprotection?
X
Schools?
X
Parks?
X
Other public facilities?
X
Comments:
14.a. Less Than Signiflcant Impact: The proposed project will add a total of 45 single family residences to
the community that will have a very minor (less than significant) impact upon, or result in a need for new or
altered fire, police, school, recreation, or other public facilities. Development of this site was previously
analyzed and anticipated in the Final Environmental Impact Report that was prepared for the City of Temecula
General Plan. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from L -Low Density to VL -Very Low Density
will incrementally increase the need for some public services. However, this increase is considered a very
small increment that can be addressed when the project is required to contribute its fair share to public
services through the City's Development Impact Fees (DIF). In addition, the project was reviewed and
conditioned by the Police and Fire Departments in order to ensure adequate facilities, acceptable service ratios
and response times.
A significant portion of the project, approximately 10 acres will be preserved as open space, and the remaining
developed portion will contain trails that can provide linkages to existing and future development in the area.
Therefore, no new public parks will be required. The incremental effect on schools will be reduced through the
payment of applicable school fees at the time the project is developed. A less than significant impact is
anticipated as a result of this project.
23
15. RECREATION.
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mltigallon
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood
and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
X
b
Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
X
Comments:
15.a. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will have a less than significant impact on the
existing recreational opportunities and existing parks since the proposed project will create approximately 10
acres of open space and provide trails that will link the development to Walcott Lane and Butterfield Stage and
beyond. In addition, the City owns and maintains 38 parks, and has two recreation centers, an outdoor
amphitheater, a gymnasium, two swimming pools, a senior center, the Temecula Museum and Children's
Museum. The proposed development may slightly increase the use of the existing parks or other recreational
facilities in the area, however the demand will not increase significantly as a result of the project. The
proposed project would not directly increase or result in the substantial deterioration of the existing park and
recreational facilities. It is anticipated that the proposed project will have a less than significant impact.
15.b. No Impact: The project includes the preservation of approximately 10 acres of open space and the
creation of community trails that will link the development to a future multi -use trail along Walcott lane and
provide a link to a sidewalk along the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road. In addition, the preservation
of open space will ensure that the project will not have an adverse physical effect on the environment. No
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
24
16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Signiflcanl With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
nwrpomted
Inniact
Im act
a
Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy
establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance
of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of
transportation including mass transit and non -motorized
travel and relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways
and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass
transit?
X
b
Conflict with an applicable congestion management
program, including, but not limited to level of service
standards and travel demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion management agency
for designated roads or highways?
X
c
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
I X
d
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses e.., farm equipment)?
X
e
Result in inadequate emergency access?
X
f
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding
public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise
decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?
X
Comments:
16.a.b. Less Than Significant Impact: According to the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by VA
Consulting for the project, "The proposed rezoning would result in a net increase of 383 vehicle trips per day,
with 30 and 40 net trips respectively, in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resulting traffic from this
development has little to no impact on predicted Year 2013 and General Plan Buildout level of service at
intersections surrounding the project based on an analysis that combined project peak hour volumes with
forecasted volumes." Furthermore, the TIA states, "There are no concerns regarding on-site circulation
associated with the proposed project. The project access roadways are appropriately sized and configured for
the project volumes and designed in accordance with applicable agency standards. The project access
location along Walcott Lane does not satisfy warrants for signalization with either Year 2013 or General Plan
Buildout conditions and will operate at LOS B or better with stop -control on the project approach." It is
anticipated that the proposed project will have a less than significant impact.
16.c. No Impact: The proposed project will not have an impact on air traffic patterns and will not result in a
substantial safety risk. The project is not within with the French Valley Comprehensive Land Use Plan, nor is
the project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact is anticipated.
16.d.e.f. No Impact: The proposed project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The
project is designed to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. The proposed project
provides for adequate ingress and egress from the site. The Fire and Police Departments have reviewed and
approved he emergency access only to Butterfield Stage Road, and on-site circulation. The proposed project
will not conflict with adopted plans, policies, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
25
facilities or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. No impact is anticipated as a result
of the proposed project.
26
17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
X
b
Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X
c
Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
X
d
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
X
e
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to theprovider's existing commitments?
X
f
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate theproject's solid waste disposal needs?
X
g
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste?
X
Comments:
17.a.b.d e. Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not exceed applicable wastewater
treatment requirements, require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment
providers. The project will meet all Regional Water Quality Control Board standards. The Riverside County
Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the proposal and indicated that sanitary sewer and potable
water are available in this area. The project is anticipated to have a less than significant impact.
17.c. Less Than Significant Impact: It is not anticipated that the project will create a significant amount of
storm water runoff to require or result in the expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was prepared and has
been conceptually accepted and conditioned for approval by the City's WQMP Engineer. The project is
anticipated to have a less than significant impact.
17.f.g. Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in the need for new landfill capacity. Any
potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in
Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
27
18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project:
Less Than
Potentially
Significant With
Less Than
Significant
Mitigation
Significant
No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources
Impact
Incorporated
Impact
Impact
a
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
orprehistory?
X
b
Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of robable future projects)?
X
c
the project have environmental effects which will
IDoes
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
I
X
Comments:
18.a. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: As discussed in the sections above, the
project would involve the construction and development of 45 new single-family homes on 22 net acres and
would not significantly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history prehistory.
According to the Biological Resource Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis
for Walcott Estates report prepared by ECORP Consulting, Inc., the project site supports several areas where
water appears to temporarily pond, and these habitat features have a potential to support fairy shrimp. Thus,
the report concludes that there is a potential to reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal. As such, mitigation is required to conduct surveys during the rainy season. These surveys
have since been conducted and documented in a report by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc. The report
concludes that no suitable on-site conditions for vernal pools were observed and therefore no fairy shrimp,
which could reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal community.
18.b. Less Than Significant Impact: No significant cumulative impacts have been identified with the
implementation of the proposed project.
18.c. Less Than Significant Impact: No substantial environmental effects that would rause adverse effects
on human beings have been identified.
28
19. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program
EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier
EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify
the following on attached sheets.
a
Earlier analyses used. Identify earlier analyses and state where they are available for review.
b
Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope of
and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c
Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe
the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to
which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
19.a. The City's General Plan, Final Environmental Impact Report and the City of Temecula's Geographic
Information System (GIS) Map Sets were used as a referenced source in preparing the Initial Study for this
project. The City's General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Report are available for review at the City of
Temecula Planning Department located at 41000 Main Street in Temecula. The GIS Map Sets are available
online at www.citvoftemecula.org.
19.b. There were no impacts that were previously addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier
analysis.
19.c. See attached Mitigation Monitoring Program.
SOURCES
1. City of Temecula General Plan
2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook
4. Jurisdictional Delineation for TT32780 in the City of Temecula, Thomas Olsen Associates, Inc. April
2006
5. Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation for Propsed 22 -Acre Residential Development, Walcott Lane,
March 2004
6. A Cultural Resources Survey of the Karen Lynn Lane Project in Temecula, Brian F. Smith and
Associates, August 2004
7. Traffic Impact Analysis for Walcott Estates, Tentative Tract No. 36295, VA Consulting, Inc., May 2011
8. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, Walcott Estates Development, Entech Consulting Group,
January 2011
9. Noise Impact Analysis, Walcott Estates, Kunzman Associates, September 2010
10. Biological Resource Assessment, Burrowing Owl Survey, and MSHCP Consistency Analysis for
Walcott Estates, ECORP Consulting, Inc. February 2011
29
ORIGINAL MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA10-0145, DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WALCOTT ESTATES
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame /
Responsible
Monitoring Milestones
Monitoring Party
AIR QUALITY
Short-term cumulative
• Water exposed surfaces three times daily but prevent
During grading and
City of Temecula
impacts to air quality
tracking of mud from exiting the construction site or from
construction activities.
Planning and Public
due to construction
reaching or entering any type of storm water conveyance
Works Departments.
system on the site
• Apply soil stabilizers to inactive areas.
• Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of
freeboard.
• Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or
staging areas.
• Sweep any site access points within 30 minutes of any visible
dirt deposition on any public roadway.
• Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris,
dirt or other dusty material.
• Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds
exceed 25 mph.
• Hydroseed or otherwise stabilize any cleared area which is to
remain inactive for than 96 hours after clearing is completed.
• Ensure that all cut and fill slopes are permanently protected
from erosion.
• Require the construction contractor to ensure that all
construction equipment is maintained in peak working order.
• Limit allowable idling to 10 minutes for trucks and heavy
equipment.
• Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods.
• Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways.
• Wet down or cover dirt haul routed but, prevent tracking of
mud from exiting the construction site or from reaching or
entering any type of storm water conveyance system on the
site.
• Sweep access points daily.
• Implement erosion controls throughout the construction site
GAPLANNING\2010\PAI0-0145 Walcott Estatcs TrM\PlanningA CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrann.doc
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame/ Monitoring
Responsible
Milestones
Monitoring Party
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
It has been determined
• Pool features on the site should be inspected for
Prior to issuance of grading
City of Temecula
that the project site has
fairy shrimp during the rainy season. If ponds are
permits and during grading and
Planning and Public
the potential to contain
confirmed to be capable of supporting fairy
construction activities.
Works Departments.
fairy shrimp, Burrowing
shrimp, then focused fairy shrimp surveys by a
Owl and the habitats of
qualified biologist are recommended.
other nesting birds
• Pursuant to MSHCP guidelines, a pre -
construction survey for burrowing owl within 30
days prior to ground disturbance.
• Pay Stephen's Kangaroo Rat fees.
• Habitat clearing should avoid the migratory bird
breeding season, which typically extends from
March 1 to August 15. If construction is to occur
during the MBTA breeding season, a nesting bird
survey should be conducted by a qualified
biologist.
GQLANNING2010TA 10-0145 Walcott Estatcs 7TM1PlanningA CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrant.doc
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame/ Monitoring
Responsible
Milestones
Monitoring Party
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potential to impact
Mitigation Measure Cu/(Res 1: Prior to beginning project
Prior to issuance of grading
City of Temecula
historic, cultural or
construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside
permits and during grading
Planning and
paleontological
County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all
and construction activities.
Public Works
resources
ground -disturbing activities in an effort to identify any
Departments
unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered
cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural
resources evaluation.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 2: At least 30 days prior to
beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall
contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading,
excavation and the monitoring program, and to coordinate
with the City of Temecula and the Tribe to develop a
Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement.
The Agreement shall address the treatment of known
cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and
participation of Native American Tribal monitors during
grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities;
project grading and development scheduling; terms of
compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final
disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and
human remains discovered on the site.
GAPLANNING%20101PA10-0145 Walcott Estatcs T-rMtPlanning\1 CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring ProgremAoc
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame i Monitoring
Responsible
Milestones
Monitoring Party
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potential to impact -
Mitigation Measure CuitRes 3: Prior to beginning
Prior to issuance of grading
City of Temecula
historic, cultural or
project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a
permits and during grading
Planning and
paleontological
pre -grading report with the City (if required) to document
and construction activities.
Public Works
resources
the proposed methodology for grading activity observation.
Departments
Said methodology shall include the requirement for a
qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have
the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In
accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the
archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect
grading will be exercised in consultation with the
appropriate Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of
any archaeological resources discovered on the property.
Tribal monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading,
excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also
have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities in
consultation with the project archaeologist.
GAPLANNINGt2010\PA I D-0145 Walcott Estal" 9TIATIanning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progmm.doc
General Impact
CULTURAL
Potential to impact
historic, cultural or
paleontological
resources
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigation Measure
mTaganon measure cwrnes 4: IT numan remains are
encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until
the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary
findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public
Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left
in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as
to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the
Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be
Native American, the Native American Heritage
Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The
Native American Heritage Commission must then
immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of
receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely
descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within
48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the
treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources
Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in
MM 2.
Mitigation Measure Cu/tRes 5: The landowner shall
relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including
sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts
that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe
for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Measure CultRes 6: All sacred sites, should
they be encountered within the project area, shall be
feasible.
Time Frame / Monitoring
Milestones
Prior to issuance of grading
permits and during grading
and construction activities.
Monitoring Pmgnm.doc
Responsible
Monitoring Party
City of Temecula
Planning and
Public Works
Departments
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame/ Monitoring
Responsible
Milestones
Monitoring Party
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potential to impact
Mitigation Measure Cu/tRes 7: If inadvertent discoveries
Prior to issuance of grading
City of Temecula
historic, cultural or
of subsurface archaeological/cultural resources are
permits and during grading
Planning and
paleontological
discovered during grading, the Developer, the project
and construction activities.
Public Works
resources
archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance
Departments
of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the
mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res.
Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of
preservation for archaeological resources. If the
Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot
agree on the significance or the mitigation for such
resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning
Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the
determination based on the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological
resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs,
customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any
other rights available under the law, the decision of the
Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning
Commission and/or City Council
GIPLANNING\2010\PA10-0145 Walcott Estates 7TM\Planning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Pmgtam.doc
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
General Impact
Mitigation Measure
Time Frame / Monitoring
Responsible
Milestones
Monitoring Party
NOISE
Potential construction,
• The construction equipment staging and storage
Prior to issuance of building
City of Temecula
operational, and traffic
areas should be located as far from the residential
permits for walls and fences
Planning and
noise impacts that could
uses as possible.
and prior to occupancy of
Public Works
expose people to noise,
. All construction equipment should be properly
units.
Departments.
ground borne vibration,
maintained with operating mufflers and air intake
and temporary periodic
silencers as effective as those installed by the
increase in ambient
original manufacturer.
noise levels.
. All construction activities should only take place
between 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through
Saturday. No construction should take place on
Sundays or nationally recognized holidays.
• The contractor shall be restricted from playing loud
music in the open construction area.
• For the duration of construction activities, the
construction manager shall serve as the contact
person should noise levels become disruptive to
local residents. A sign should be posted at the
project site with the contact phone number.
• Residents living within 1,000 feet from the existing
property line should be provided with a construction
schedule. A timely notification should accompany
any major changes to this schedule.
• Additional noise attenuation methods should be
utilized to reduce noise levels as much as possible.
These methods include, but are not limited to, the
use of sound blankets and the construction of
temporary sound barriers between active
construction areas and sensitive receptors. Any
such barriers should be constructed as close to the
sensitive receptor as possible to achieve the
greatest attenuation effect.
In order to keep the nearest sensitive receptor from
GAPLANNING2010\PA I0-0145 Walcott Esnncs TTM\Planning\I CEQA\Mitigation Monitoring Progrnm.doc
experiencing noise levels in excess of 65 dBA, the
proposed lift station must be constructed so that
noise levels do not exceed 78 dBA at a distance of
10 feet.
Exterior - A noise barrier shall be built along the
eastern edge of the property along Butterfield
Stage Road consistent with Figure 6 of the
Kunzman Associates "Noise Impact Analysis"
dated September, 2010, on file with the City of
Temecula Planning Department.
Interior - All homes should implement mitigation
measures to provide mechanical ventilation,
double -paned glass, and solid core doors with
weather stripping and seals. The homes proposed
within 300 feet along Butterfield Stage Road will
require further attenuation, which includes stucco
or brick exterior siding with half inch thick
fiberboard underlayer and interior and exterior
walls should be attached by resilient channels or
have double walls, and that exterior construction
materials have a sound transmission class of 30 or
QTLANNING12010\PA10-0145 Walcott Estates TTM\Planning\l CEQAVvliligation Monitoring Progrnm.doc
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Case No: PA14-0053
Applicant: Christine Moore
Proposal: A Major Modification to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously
approved product type and landscape plan for The Vineyards (Walcott Estates),
generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La
Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APN: 957-170-032 through 036)
Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will
be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and
Negative Declarations)
Case Planner: James Atkins, (951) 240-4206
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers
Date of Hearing: August 6, 2014
Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m.
I/ •
►� ♦,`WWIir
Y _
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the
Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning
Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website —
www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding
any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main
Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In
addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be
available for public review at the respective meeting.
If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the
Planning Department, (951) 694-6400.
GAPLANNINGQ014\PA14-0053 Walcott Estates Vineyard MOD\Planning\Planning Commission\PC-NOPH PA14-0053.docx