The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About100190 PC MinutesOF T146: ~'LANN[NG COMMISSION OF T~E CITY OF }-]F.L~ OCTOBF. R ~} , ~! .990 A requl. a, meeti. na of the Temecu[a Planning Commission was called to order at VaJ] Elementary Scboo], 29935 M.ira l,oma Dr3ve, Temecu]a, California at 6:].0 P.M. The meeting was called to order by CbaJ rpersoD ]3ennJ s CbJ n.i aeff. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: BLair, Fahey, Ford CbJ n.~ aeff ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: ~oag].and A.Isn present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Gary Thornhi[ [, Actinr~ P[anni. ng Director, John Middleton, Senior Project Manager and GaJ] Z~g]er, M.~Dute Clerk. pYJBr, IC COMMENT FRANK KI,F. IN, 30180 Sant.Ja.go Road, '?emecu]a, discussed various items with the Commission, including: increasing bike paths i.n the city, deue]op3Dg a system for making addresses more accessible to emergency vehicles, prohibition o~ tethered ba].].oon advertising, .~tora~e of ~ bus on an empty lot and dJsguJs.JDg of cylindrical tanks at the concrete batch plant, off of Front Street. GARY T~ORN~II,L advised Mr. K]e~n that some of these items were under investigation; however, he could direct all of these complaints to Mr. ~arsha]], Code Enforcement Officer, in the City Planning Department, MINUTES COMMISSIONER FORD moved to approve the minutes of August 20, 1990, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY. AYES: 4 NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff None Hoag]and first noragraph, ghnu.:d read. "di.~cussi. on with the fol ~owinq amendments: Page 3, fifth paragraph, Page 4~ third paragraph, should read "proport. y, su[:,m;~ ts d5 sorer] onary", seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY, AYR$: 4 COMMI SSTONERS: R]air, Fahey, Ford Chi. ni. aef f NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None AR.q~]N'P: .] CC)MM ] SSIONER$: Hoagland plIt:lr,[C HI~',,ARING ITEMS ?. 'PEN'.PATIV~. PARCEl, MAP NO. 2563? Proposal. to subdivide 4.7 acres into 10 parcels in the M.S~C. gone, to constrllct an industrial park on the sm.lthw~,st side of Business Park Drive, north o[ Rancho O).IVER MIIJICA presented the staff report on this item. COMMISS[ONW. R CHINIAEFF opened the publ. ic hearing. WARREN ,]AMES, Weston Properties representative, requested ~].arification and toodill. cation of the following Conditions of Approval : Plot Plan No. .]] 688, Condition No. 27, Mr. James requested. that this item read "Unless already paid, prior to"i Condition No. 47, ETA be deleted. COMMISSIONER FAHEY clarified that prior to the meeting, a revised set. of Eng.~neering conditions were provided and under these revised conditions, Mr. James was requesting Condition No. 31 be deleted. Mr. James also requested modifications to the Conditions of. Approval for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25637, Condition No. 38, to read: "reciprocal access agreement or common ownership"; Condition No. 70, revised to read "Unless already paid, prior to" Condition No. 37, revised to read "If required, the subdivider"; Condition No. 4?, Mr. James requested MIN, 10/1/90 -2- 10/10/90 that this Conditin~ ba deleted. JO~{N MIDOLETON and GARY C¢)MM[SSIONF, R CHINIAF,~'F ~tated that. the RTA was assigned to cover the A()MD r~uJreme~ts for tb~ City and therefor~ ~ho]lid rmmain a.S Part n~ Cnndj. t].on No, 47, COMMI,.q$[ION~;R .~'ORD advJ sed Mr. ,]ames that the recJ proca] acc~.ss agreement would be a memor~.nc[um to the parcel map which would be f~;rtber e~forced by the CC&R'g. .M~. JAMES stated that he wanted to avoid having to record the CC&R's that although it was suggested that the CC&R's be au~ti. nnad i.f the Commission could require that the cc&2a's be recorded add JO~N CAVANAUGH stated that they cnul. d, JOfgN MIDDI,ETON stated that the reason the CC&R's were wri tten i.n was to create an agreement between the City and the app)ScaDt as to bow the site would be maintained. Assistant City Attorney JORN CAVANAUG~ advised that a separate .)andscape agreement col)]d be prepared for the maintenance of the common areas. (IOMM1S$IONW. R FO)~D moved to c]os~ the public hearing, seconded by CO~4MISS[ONER FAHF, Y and carried unani. mously. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: B]air, Fahey, Ford Chi. ni. aef f NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Hoes]aDd COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to Adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 25637, and P]ot P] an No. 1].688, Approve Tentative .Parcel Map No. 25632 and Approve Plot Plan No..]3688 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (as replaced by the Planning Department) with the following modifications: Plot P)an, Condition No. 27, amended to read "Unless prevfously paid"; Condition No. 31 to rems.in as is; Tentative Par~e] Map, Condition No. 18 to remain as i.s; Condition No. 20 to read "Unless previously paid"; Condition No. 4~ to be deleted. MIN. 10/1/90 -3- 10/10/90 A B,q'~:N T: 3 OOMM J S S 7! ()N F,R S: None PERMIT NO. 4 3..3 Pro~osaJ to construct a 924 sO. ft. gasoline service stati. on and mini-market wi. th beer and wine sales t. ocated at the southeast corner of 8R79 and Bedford Court. STRVR PArK)VAN provided the staff report on thi.~ project. GARY Tt~'ORN}III,I. stated that the p}anniDg department had been worki. nq wi. th the applicant regarding the areas "oetwe~D the ;~ iacent reside~t.~a] housJn~ add the proposed gaso].ine station. He stated that the app].J. cant had reeoDf~gured some of the r~ar DarkJag and reJocated the air and water service area c].oser to SR79. He also a mod. ilicati. on o~ the No,its o~ oneration proposed by the CO~4M[SSIONW, R CH[NIA~.PP opened the Dubl. i.c hearing. ),ARRY MARK~IAM, Markham & Associates, 4.]750 Winchester Road, Temecul. a, indicated that the applicant has concurred with the staf~ report; however, the proposed hoilrs of operation were not acceptable, and that they were seeking 74 hour operation. He stated t. bat they ~e)t they had adequate].y addressed the issue of noise by providing .landscape buff. ers and block wal].s to separate the residential. housing f. rom the proposed gasol. ine station. He also stated that the applicant was proposing an on-site security guard. Mr. Markham requested modification of the following Conditions: No. 44, he indicated that the SR79 right-o~.-way had already been dedicated; No. 49 - 54, 57 and 58, Mr. Markham stated MIN.].0/1/90 -4- lo/~o/9o for the improvements ot],~er than what t.ney ]have already done and that. Assesgm~n.t ~Jatri~,t Nn, 1.59 h.a.~ expressed that they do ~ot want t]n~m done at tb~g t~me~ No. 59, he asked. the Cnmmi. g~.on i.f they had a time frame for the TERESA BANES[, 44737 "C" i',a Paz, Temecu[a, stated that she ~,q or)e of the 1146 homeowners adjacent to this project and feel. s that they shoul, d not have to 1. i. ve next to a gas ,~t~tion, No ode else requested to speak on this item. I,ARR¥ MARKHAM stated that the appl. i. cant and representatives have met w~tb t.he ~omeowner's Board on three d~.fferent octass%OhS and. presented the Pl. anning Department wJt.n a draft ]ett-r from them giving their CO~W~41,.qSION~;R Ck!IN]AEFF inetJested .he was torn on this propose!. i,n that the cornmerci. a[ desi. qnati. on for this war- bu] It. In addit].on, th~.s ~.s one of on].y three off- ramps J~ tow~ add the proposed use should be Iotated at an o~f ramp to held tell. eye congestion i.n the core of the city. The Japact oD the residences cou)d be softened by a redesJ. qn of the site. COMMISSIONER WORD moved to close the public hearing and deny the Negative Dec].aration and not adopt the Resolution aIDDrOVing Conditions) Use Permit No. 4, and direr. ted staff to re-submit to the Commission with appropri. ate landscape p]ans, assessment district p]an,~, determination on the hours of operation, architectural plans and input from the Rainbow Meadows Homeowners Association. COMMISSIONER BLAIR seconded the motion. AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff NOES: ]. COMMISSIONERS: Fahey ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hoag]and MIN. 10/1/90 -5- 10/10/90 ~, VARtA. NC~ NO, 7 348, ~t.i.on 1.9,4 (a.4) in ~wd.~ to obt~i.n ~a~ai. ~ ~ SCOTT WRIGHT provided the staff report on this item. He stated that the proposed signs were sma]]er than the maximum size m[ [owed and that the appt. icant had provided H~ ad.d,~d. that the freeway signs woul. d hava n. maxi.mum of two tenants named and t.ne other s~gn.q would have a maximum of four tenant~ named. (tO~M~[SSIONER R)~,~%IR cjuestJoned that diagrams provided Jn the aqenda packages indicated eight tn ten names slots on COMMISSIONER C}{INIAF, FF opened the .~ub]Jc bearJ.~g. GRF. G ERICKSON, Radford Properties, stated that they would ac~ree to condition the signs to two add four tenants. COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to cl. ose the public heari. ng and adopt geso]utJon 90- approving Variance No. 2; and approve Variance No. P based on the attached Conditions of Approval[ add added Co.~dJtJon No. 5 mtJpll]atJDg a maximize of two names on t~e freeway signs and four names on the other signs, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD and carried as foL Laws: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: HoaR]and RECESS COM.~IS$IONE~ CHINIAEFF declared a five minute recess at 7:45 P.M. The meeting reconvened at 7:50 P.M. MI~. 10/1t90 -6- 10/10/90 PLOT PLAN NO. 1.1.622 Prooo,~a] to eon.~truct 5 5~dustr~a] buJ)dings (~17 -]6,000 scruare ~eet each) at the 27800 bl. oc{< of Diaz Road.. S'P~.VF. d'rANNiINO prov~aea t~n~ stall re~ort on t.~is pro~ect, ,lORN M[DDI,F, TON advised the Copamission that Condition No. 36 a~d (;o~Oition No. 42 had been revised ..per the memorandum of September ~8, 1.9g0, CO~],qSIONF. R CT~'INIAF. PP opo~O t.be ~xtb]ic bearing. ~'~,VF, ~I'~ND¥,~iY, Spectrum CnntractJ. ng, Inc., expressed co.ncurrenc~ with stati's recommendations. ~ reouested ct. arificatinn of Cond. itJ. on No. '13, GARY T~ORN~I'~'.L stated t.his Cona]tJoD cou]G be d~/eted; Condition No. 30, amended to read "[~ required, protect. inn sha].l. be". Mr. Hendl. ey a]~o r,ql]ested c.tarj~jcatjoD of Condition No. 36. JO~N MIDDLETON stated that Condition No. 36 could be amended to r~ad "coDStrllCt drive approaches, parkway trees and ~traat ].iqhts on Diaz Road". The Commiss.5on expressed eoncern for the landscape plan, specJ. fJ. call. y I. andscaping adjacent to the buJ. tding fronting DJ aZ Road , COMMISSIONRR CBINIA~PP stated that be would fee] cnmfortab[e with staff approving the landscape as long as they were aware that the Commission wants well developed specimens and not five gal.[on trees. COMWISSIONE~ FORD moved to cJose the public hearing, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR. COMMISSIONER FORD moved to adopt the Negative Declaration ~or Plot P]an No. 31622 and approve Plot PI, an No. 1.1622, Reguest for Site Approval, subject to the Conditions o~ Approval with the following modifications: Condition No. 13 deleted; Condition No. 30 modi.~ied to read "If reguired, protection"; and Condition No. 36 modified to read "construct dr~ve approaches, parkway trees and street lights on Diaz Road"; and direct staff to work with applicant on landscape p]ans. Seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY and carried as follows: MIN.10/1/90 -7- 10/10/90 Ch.ini aeff f~, PT,¢)'I' Pf,AN NO, Prol%o,~aJ to ~.on,~tru~t an iI~{,??.5 ~(~llare foot retail ,~howroom.--furn. i. ture st. or* on the north ~i. de of gnte~prJ.~ S~.VE JIANN[NO provi.ded the staff report on this i. tem. He advJse(~ the CommJssJo.n that staff was concerned w1. th the 1. oadJ, ng and unl. oad].ng space. He stated that the project Js Dot designed wJt~ rear ]oad.~ng doors; however the appt.~.cant has ind~.cated that the building wJ jt ] be a furniture showroom for display OD]y and that the sol. es and shi. pgi. ng wi.].l be ~rom another I. ocatJ. on. (;OMMIS,qlONF,.R CH]NIAEPF addressed the issue of a furn-~ture showroom Incated ~,n a orifice/industrial bui. l. ding area. GARY TIqOl~NH.ILL stated that the D]aDn.ing staff cannot address the J, ssue of llse, which is set by the ord.~.nance. JO~IN ;MIDDI,F.~'ON advi sed the Comm.~ s.~i on that Concti ti oD of Approval. No. 31 was amended to read "area shown as 30' x 50' ingress and egress or) the Plot Plan sba]) be J.mproved w].th A.C. pavement to the same standards as the on-site parking Jot". COmmISSIONER CHIN[AEPP opened the public hearing. JEFP HARDY, Jeif Hardy Architecture, 27349 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula, advised the Commi. ssion that Condition o~ Approval No. 2] stipulated that BuS]d~ngs A and B, which comprised of sixty to seventy percent of the project could only be used for furniture, drapery, plumbing, floor coveri. ng, and appliance stores. He also commented that the CC&R's required the driveway approaches to be decorative concrete and thereinre would like Condition No. 3] amended. JOHN MIDDLETON stated that concrete would be acceptable. Regarding MZN. ~0/~/90 -8- ZOtZO/90 Condi. tian No. 27, ~.,:, Irtarc~y rec~uested that. a restaurant be a.lJow~d to 3n t]D3ts ¢! ti~rou~ih ? if they can Drav.i~e based on the reQuirement~ ni~ tna ordinanca, GARY TIqORN}9']I,L advised t.~e ¢;omm3ss~oD the and ~ w~'e not aDD l, ~,cab i, ~ unless the a~D[~cant aoreed to fh~, M,R. ~ARDY stated t.bat be wou~t~ agree to Condition No. 2J. and Condition No. ~'2 wJ th the modi.~icati. on he ~R, ~ARDY recn~ested CondJtJoB No, 45 be deleted because Jt applied to PLot Pl. an No. 1, t. 759. He also asked ~.f the City Attorney wo~l.td approve COD(littOn NO. 7 to read "The owner/ developer shal [ aqree". JOHN CAVANAUC,%~ stated that this would be acceptable. CO~MISSIONER CHINIAF. FF expressed concern for the quantity and ].ocati. on of~ the trash enclosure. MR. HARDY stated that the trash enc.[osure coillid b~ eD)ar~ed to hold another trash bin; however, i.n working with the City requirements add the CC&R'~, the proposed location of the trash bin was the most appropriate place. COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF island and the trash encLoseire Locations. MR. HARDY was The Con~raission expressed concern J.n approving the project kDowjnc~ that futi{re ilses of the s~te may cal{se the project to be ~lnderDarked. They a}.so expressed concern t~or the )ocr oi adequate trash ~aci ] Jt.~es .for the uses and the project and tlle proposed ].oad±ng zone. COMM]SSIONF, R WAHEY moved to cil ose the public bear.log and not adopt the NegatJ. ve Declaration for Plot P].an No. ],]609, not adopt Resolution 90-, ........ and deny Plot Plan No. l[609, Request .for Site Approval. COMMISSIONER BLAIR seconded the motion. COMMISSIONER C~INIAEFF recommended that instead o~ denying the application, ~t be continued to allow the applicant to work w~th sta~ on the problems, The motion stood as made. MIN. 10/1/90 -9- 10/10/90 NOES A'R ,q'~:N q' COM. M ]~ ,qS lONERS COMM]SS]ONERS '1, P.T,OT Pt,AN NO. ].1.7.59 Pro~osa.i to co.nstruct an ]8,300 square foot industrial bU.l.J, di. tlq on the north side o~ Enterprise Ci. rcl. e, west STEVE alANNINe) provided the staff re.)ort on this project. He stated that the bu~.[d~.ng woul. d be used for a cab%net s~oD. iIOHN MIDDI.ETON requested condition No. 35 be amended to read. "Construct A.C. or concrete pavement" After Commission d~scussion, Condition No. 35 was amended to read "Construct concrete pavement improvements" COI4~41SSIONER CH]NIAF. FF o.)ened the public bearing. ,IF. FF HARDY, ,Ie[~ Hardy ArchJ. tect~lre, 27349 Jef. f. erson Avenue, Temecu.[a, reo. uested the to)lowing modifications to the Condi. ti. ons of. Approval: No. 7, replace the word a~.))icaDt w.itb owDer/deve]operl No. 9, if not a City requirement woui. d like to uti. l. ize single ].ine striping The Comm.JssioD expresse~ concern for the location and number of. dust/trash reciprocals. The applicant and the Commission aqreed that rather than ,)]ace them insi. de the bui. l.d~.ng, they should be placed outside the bil.~ ld.~Dg w.~tb a we) ] to .)roperly .~creen them. COMPIISSIONER FAHEY moved to cl. ose the pub].it heari. ng and adopt the Negative Dec)station for Plot Plan No. ]1759, adopt Resolution No. 90-_ ........ and approve Plot Plan No. ]]759, Reguest for Site Approval, subject to the attached Conditions of. Approval amended as follows: Condition No. 7 to read "The owner/developer shall"; Condition No. 9 MIN. 10/1/90 -10- 10/10/90 to remai. n as wr].tten; Con~.i ti.o~ No. 35 to read "Construct ~.oncr~te ~avemeDt"~ add with the addition of Condition No. 58 w&i. ch wi.I.I. sO. dress the I. ocation of the trash en. cl. osure, addit,.on of another trash hi.n. GARY T~OR.N~[~ff, suggested ~)e~artment Con~l. tl. ons. CO~[SS[ONER FORD seconded t~e mot] on, wbi cb terri ed as fo.l J ows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: 8(air, Fahey, NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: ] COMNI SS] ONERS: Hoaqll and TENTATIVE PARCET, ~AP NO. 25538 Propo,.~al) to .gubdivide a .] .43 acre parcel into two parcels at. W~.nchester Road and 30565 Estero Street. $T~V~ JIANNINO provided the staff report on this item. JOHN MII)I)I,ETON requested the ~ol.l. owi. ng modi. f. icatJ. ons to t.he (;ond~tiOnS of Approvall : No. 23 (a) delete the reference to "s~.dewa[k"; No. 33 amended to read "a mi. nimum center.i~ne grade sba)) De 0.50 Dercent"; a~d No. 35 amended to read "(36-60)"; and replace pages 3 and 4 4 o~ Sentember ~8, 1.990. (:ONNISSIONE}~ CI~INIAEFF opened the Dub]it hearincl. NIKE BENESH, genesch Enqzneering, requested clarification of Condition No. 35. He questioned if the engineering department was requesting full street improvements at this time. JOHN MIDDLETON stated that they are requesting 28' o~ improvements at this time. MR. BENESH provided the Commission with a opinion from the Attorney General in 1978 regarding the legality of the subdivision of one parcel under a tract map, which indicated that the other parcels of the tract map do not Deed to be inc]uded. City Attorney JOHN C, AVANAUGH stated that the the Attorney <;e~er~.{ w~,~ ~ot b~ndJng and ~be did not ~av~ to base their action on it. .~!]K~: iF~F.N,~:S~ state<~ that under the ordinance t.ney were ~nt reauired to m~,t i~ eo~erete curb and qutter ~m~rovem~nts: .~nwever, they wou)d ac~ree to Condit. ion No. COmmISSIONER BI,AIR moved to c}ose the pub].it bearing add ad. oDt the Negative Oecl. arati. on ~.or Parcel. Map No. P5538 o~ A~DrovaL as s~lbmi. tted, i. nc~l.ldJ. ng the modifications to as ~o}. l. ows: AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: B]a~r, Fahey, Ford Chiniaeff NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: [t COMMISSIONERS: Hoao}and NON-PUB{',[C R~ARING I~EMS SIIBSTANTIAI, (:ONFOI{MANCE NO. P, SP ,]64 9.]. Proposal. to del. ete the CLass I bike trail in Planning Area No. 4 of the RorJpaugb H.J] ].~ Estates, ] ocated at NJcho] as Road, between Winchester and General Kearne¥. GARY THORNHILl, advJsed t:he CommJ ssJ oD that staff was stil. I, working with the applicant and requested a re~ommemdatJon for contJDumnce at this time. COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to continue Substantial Conformance No. 2, SP 364 to October ]5, 1990, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR and carried as follows: MIM. 10/1190 -12- 10/10/90 ?{,ANN! N{; {:OHM] ,q,.qT[ON H7[NI'I'.{'~:S O(;?OIR},XR .] , J 5490 C()MM[SS[ONERS: a[air, Fahey, Fora NOES: 0 COMM [.qSIONERS: None ABSF:N'I'r jl COMMISSIONERS: {.0. TENTATIVE MAP NO. ~276]., EXTENSION OF TIME and Prior to nearing this item, COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF stepped down ~ue to a conflict of ~nterest and tllrned the gave] over to Vice Chairman COMMISSIONER FORD. Proposal{ for first extension of time on vroject Iotated south of Rancho Ca[i. fornia Road, west. of. ¥nez Road and easterJ¥ of I--.]5. ProPosal for first extension of time on project located south of. Rancho Ca[J. fornia Road, west of. Ynez Road and easterJ ¥ of I-) 5. RICHARD AYAI.A provided the staff report on this item. COMMISSIONER FORD questioned J.f the applicant was part of a aeve]opment a~reement. The applicant confirmed that they did have a development agreement. RIC!4ARD KI,ASSEN, Coleman Homes, 42850 Agena Street, 'P~mecul. a, requested c[arificati. on of the fol. l. owing CoDdi tioDs of Approval: No. ) . Mr. K.lassen stated that the site has el. ready been graded; therefore, the SKR fees have been satisfied; No. 2, Mr. K]assen. questioned park and recreation fees. G~Y ~ORN~I[,L stated that they would satisfy this requirement under the development agreement; therefore, the Condition should read "pay the fee or satisfy tne the County requirement". Mr. K[assen also requested that Condition No. 8 be modified to read "precise grading plan". COMMISSIONER FAREY moved to approve the First Extension of Time and to approve Tentative Tract Map No. 22761, Minor Change No. l, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval amended as follows: MIN.10/1/90 -13- 10/10/90 Co'ad,'i. ti. on No. {. to read. "u,n.l~.,~,,~ Drev'}.ousi. y to buJ.l~Jnq permit", and carried as tot. lows: AYES: Blair, Fahey, Ford NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ARS'I'A ]' N: :~ COMMI S,.qI ONER S: Cbi ni aeff ABSENT: [ COMMISSIONERS: Hoagiand COMMISSI¢)N~:R FAH~:Y moved to approve the First Extension of. Tl. me and to approve Tentative Tract Map No, 22'16,2, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. amended as f.o[I. ows: Condition No. I. to read "unless prev.~ously paid": No. 2 to indicate either the re~ui. re~ent has been satl. s~i. ed or the ~ees are paid; add No. 8 to r~ad "Dr]or to bl~)JdJDq permit", mecopded by COMM[SSTONKR '8f,AIR and carried as AYES: 3 COMMISSIONERS: B]aJ r, Fahey, Fora NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 31 COMMISSIONERS: ChJ nJ aeff ABSENT: I. COMMISSIONERS: Hoagland CO}4MI$SIONER CHINIAF. FF returned to the chair. ~)1SCIISS [ON ITEMS GARY THORN~II,L advised the Commission that City Manager, David Dixon would be present at the October ].5, ].990, Planning Commission meeting to provide them with an update on the status of the General Plan. Mr. Thornhill also directed the Commission to choose two individuals to participate in the selection o~ the Genera] Plan consultant. COMMISSIONER ~OAGLAND and COMMISSIONER FORD were e.~ected w~th COMMISSIONER BLAIR as an alternate. MIN. 10/1/90 -14- 10/10/90 r-~I'.AI~NING CO?4M'fSSION MINI ).S OC')O ~.R ] ]990 Mr. Thorntxit. I. atso di.,~cu.,q,~ed the dif. fi.c~ll. ty staler ~as waen r~v~n~ the ~e.~i~n of a~.~eations ~ith no ouideJ inca on aesion, an interim design O~ide]l~e ~lnti.I tbe Genera~t P]a~ was complete. Me suggested that the CommJ. a~i. on may want to ~et-~lp a work ~hop to workshop addressing de,gJ. gn guidel. inea, to be held October 22, ].g90, 6:00 P.,~. at Va] i~ E.[ eme~tary Scboo;; , 299) 5 MJ ra I,oma Drive, ?emec~l[.a. Me stated that he wo~l[d provide them with examples of AI) JOIJRNMENT CHAIRNAN DENNIS CHINIAF. FF aajourned the meeting at 9:45 P.M. The next regular meeti. ng of the Temecu[a Pi. annJ. nc! Co~ission wi[[ be belin Octo.~r 11.5, ~1990. 6:00 P.I~. at Vail .F,]ementary School , 299.]5 Mira f,oma Drive, Temecula. ~)ENN[S CHINi~EFF, CHAIRMAN SECRETARY MIM. 10/1/90 -15- 10t10190