Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
082614 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 26, 2014 — 7:00 PM At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:15 P.M. — The City Council will convene in Closed Session in the Canyons Conference Room on the third floor of the Temecula City Hall concerning the following matters: 1) Conference with Real Property Negotiators. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding one parcel of real property owned by the City of Temecula as the Housing Successor Agency to the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency consisting of approximately 32 acres (APN 909-370-002) located northwesterly of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway in the City of Temecula. The parties to the negotiations for the potential sale of the property are: Wild Rivers Temecula, LLC and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for Wild Rivers, LLC are: Michael Riedel and Jeff Hopkins; negotiators for the City of Temecula are: Aaron Adams, Greg Butler, Armando Villa and Luke Watson. Under negotiation are price and terms of the potential sale of the property. Public information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. Next in Order: Ordinance: 14-08 Resolution: 14-55 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards Prelude Music: Chy'anne Smock Invocation: Pastor Leon Franklin of The Living Word Flag Salute: Council Member Roberts ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Constitution Week Proclamation 1 PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the City Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the City Council on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, 10 minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 That the City Council make a motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council approve the action minutes of August 12, 2014. 3 List of Demands RECOMMENDATIONS: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 2 4 Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement for the 16th Annual Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement with the Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, in the amount $15,058 for in-kind city support services, $10,865 for in-kind promotional services, and $22,500 in cash for the October 19, 2014, Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure event. 5 Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans Supplemental Support Network for the Salute to Heroes Charity Ride and Glow Fair RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with the Veterans Supplemental Support Network for city -support costs, in the amount of $6,830, and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2014 Salute to Heroes Charity Ride and Glow Fair. 6 Sponsorship Agreement with Cyclemania for the Temecula Valley Century RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Cyclemania for city -support costs, in the amount of $8,300, and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the Temecula Valley Century. 7 Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for traumatic incident citizen support. 8 First Amendment to Exclusive Negotiating Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Wild Rivers Temecula, LLC Regarding City -Owned Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway (909-370-002) RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) between the City and Wild Rivers Temecula, LLC, (Wild Rivers) for the potential purchase and sale of the City -owned Diaz Road property (APN: 909-370-002) (Subject Property). 3 9 Second Amendment to the Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., in the amount of $50,000, for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services, for a total agreement amount of $102,000. 10 First Amendment to the Agreement with CWE for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Community Park), PW11-10 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with CWE, in the amount of $47,715, for the design of Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10, adjacent to the Pala Community Park. 11 Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for Pauba Road Sidewalks, PW13-08 RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Pauba Road Sidewalks, PW13-08; 11.2 Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. 12 Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs for Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW 14-07 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs for Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW 14-07; 12.2 Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. 13 Approval of Parcel Map 36413 (Located at the Southwest Corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road) RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve Parcel Map 36413 (located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road) in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 13.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Cash Deposit Agreement for Monumentation as security for this agreement. 4 14 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map 23065-3 RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 23065-3) 15 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map 30264-1, -5, -8, and -11 RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 30264-1, -5, -8 AND -11) 16 Second Reading of Ordinance Nos. 14-05 and 14-06 RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0131, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350- 017, 018, 019, 020) 16.2 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0132, ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.254 THROUGH 17.22.266, INCLUSIVE, PDO -13 ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, TO CHAPTER 17.22 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) 5 DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO - 13, ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (OS) (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) 17 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 14-07 RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.28.500 OF CHAPTER 8.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS AND FINDING THAT ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ******************** 6 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 14-01 Resolution: No. CSD 14-05 CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. If the speaker chooses to address the Board of Directors on an item listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filled out and filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing Public Comments and the Consent Calendar. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or District Business items on the agenda, a Request to Speak form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. Each speaker is limited to five minutes. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 18 Action Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of August 12, 2014. 19 Agreement with Seaside Ice, LLC dba: Ice -America for the 2014 Holiday Season Outdoor Ice Skating Rink RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 That the Board of Directors approve an Agreement with Seaside Ice, LLC dba: Ice -America, in the amount of $40,000, for the 2014 holiday season outdoor ice skating rink. 7 CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 9, 2014, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. 8 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY — no meeting TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY — no meeting TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY — no meeting 9 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 20 Old Town Local Review Board Appointments RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 That the City Council appoint two applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local Review Board through June 15, 2017. 21 Planning Commission Appointment RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 That the City Council appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Planning Commission through June 15, 2017. 22 2014 Community Opinion Survey Report RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Receive and file the 2014 Community Opinion Survey Report. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 23 City Council Travel/Conference Report — July 2014 24 Community Development Department Monthly Report 25 Police Department Monthly Report 26 Public Works Department Monthly Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT 10 ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, September 9, 2014, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the City Council meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.cityoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department, (951) 694- 6444. 11 PRESENTATIONS • 44 _ I71MMI".1!fl�mlmm ��,: "�'��- Ch+e r _ \ nnn:r r mmmnmf,r-- .ec. TION of America, the guardian of our liberties, dedicated to rule by law; and hundred twenty-seventh anniversary of the by the Constitutional Convention; and recognition to this magnificent document and which will commemorate it; and of a proclamation each year by the President 17 through September 23, as Constitution behalf of the City Council of the City of 23, 2014, to be Week" of the Constitution had by vigilantly protecting liberties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Temecula to be affixed this twenty-sixth day of August, 2014. .. _ Gtr' lir The City of Temecula PROCLAMA WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States embodies the principles of limited government in a Republic WHEREAS, September 17, 2014, marks the two framing of the Constitution of the United States of America WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper to accord official its memorable anniversary, and to the patriotic celebrations WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuing of the United States of America designating September Week. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Maryann Edwards, on Temecula, hereby proclaim September 17 through September "Constitution and ask our citizens to reaffirm the ideals the Framers the freedoms guaranteed to us through this guardian of our Maryann Edwards, Mayor Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk Item No. 1 CONSENT CALENDAR Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 12, 2014 — 7:00 PM The City Council meeting convened at 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards Prelude Music: Elizabeth Monacelli and Teri Niebell Invocation: Pastor Gary Martin Flag Salute: Boy Scouts Troop #384 ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Edwards PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Recognition of Dennis "Denny" Wenker PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals addressed the City Council: • Nicholas Louvar • Ken Nordstrom • Matt Rahn • Bernie Bramante • Johnny Roberts • Captain Gerald Davis • Jimmy Moore CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR • Wayne Hall addressed the City Council on Item 8. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. Action Minutes 081214 1 RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Action Minutes — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the action minutes of July 22, 2014. 3 List of Demands — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2014 — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0- 0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of June 30, 2014. 5 City of Temecula City Flag Policy/Administrative Guidelines (At the Request of Mayor Edwards) — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 That the City Council receive and file City of Temecula City Flag Policy/Administrative Guidelines. Action Minutes 081214 2 6 Agreement with HDL Coren & Cone, Inc. for Property Tax Consulting Services — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 That the City Council approve a three-year Agreement with HDL Coren & Cone, Inc. for property tax consulting services in the amount of $21,000 annually, for a total three-year contract amount of $63,000. 7 Agreement with Chad Wohlford dba Wohlford Consulting for Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee Study — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve an Agreement with Chad Wohlford dba Wohlford Consulting to conduct a Full Cost of Service Study, including a Cost Allocation Plan and a User Fee Study in the amount of $41,750; 7.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve contingency in the amount of $4,175 which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount; 7.3 Authorize the appropriation of $45,925 from undesignated general fund reserves to the Finance Department Operating Budget. 8 Resolution in Support of the Release of Marine Sergeant Andrew Tahmooressi (At the Request of Council Member Naqgar) — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLYWOMAN MELISSA MELENDEZ'S LETTER URGING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TO ACTIVELY PURSUE THE TIMELY RELEASE OF MARINE SERGEANT ANDREW TAHMOORESSI 9 Seventh Operating Memorandum for Roripaugh Ranch — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. Action Minutes 081214 3 RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THREE AGREEMENTS FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE 5.1 ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK IN PLANNING AREA 6 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT: (1) THE SEVENTH OPERATING MEMORANDUM; (2) THE PARK IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PARK; AND (3) THE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF THE PARK SITE, AND MAKING FINDINGS RELATING TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 10 Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with Interwest Consulting Group for the Provision of Building Inspector Services — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 That the City Council approve the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement with lnterwest Consulting Group, in the amount of $20,000, for the provision of Building Inspector Services, for a total agreement amount of $73,100. 11 Professional Services Agreement with LaBelle Marvin, Inc. for Citywide Slurry Seal Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW14-06 — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve the Agreement for professional services with LaBelle Marvin, Inc., in the amount of $60,085, for material testing services for Citywide Slurry Seal Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW 14-06; 11.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve Extra Work Authorizations not to exceed the contingency amount of $6,008.50, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount. 12 Temporary Street Closures for 2014 Autumnfest Events — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. Action Minutes 081214 4 RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 That the City Council receive and file the following proposed action by the City Manager: Temporarily close certain streets for the following 2014 Autumnfest Events: SATURDAY NIGHT MOVIE CLASSICS TEMECULA VALLEY INTERNATIONAL FILM & MUSIC FESTIVAL HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR/SALUTE TO HEROES TEMECULA VALLEY CENTURY RIDE KOMEN RACE FOR THE CURE GREEK FESTIVAL 13 Purchase and Sale Agreements and a Temporary Construction Easement in Connection with the Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project — Approved Staff Recommendation (4-0-1, Council Member Edwards abstained) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Naggar, Roberts, and Washington with Council Member Edwards abstaining. Council Member Edwards abstained in the approval of this Resolution as such approval relates to the Murrieta Creek Improvements Project, because her employer, the Boys and Girls Club, is located within 500 feet of this project and is likely to affect her employer and this property. RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THREE AGREEMENTS FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF REAL PROPERTY AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS AND A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF ENTRY AGREEMENT BETWEEN RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN CONNECTION WITH THE MURRIETA CREEK FLOOD CONTROL, ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND RECREATION PROJECT 13.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute any necessary documents, and to take all necessary actions to complete these real estate transactions, including without limitations, all escrow instructions. RECESS At 7:47 P.M., the City Council recessed and convened to the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:49 P.M., the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. Action Minutes 081214 5 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 16 General Plan Amendment, Zone Change to PDO (L - Low Density Residential and OS - Open Space), Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review, and Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act for Arbor Vista in Nicolas Valley (Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, PA12-0132, PA12-0133, and PA12-0134) — Approved Staff Recommendation 16.2 (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. — Approved Staff Recommendation 16.3 (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. — Approved Staff Recommendation 16.1, 16.4 and 16.5 (5-0-0) Council Member Naggar made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Comerchero; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONE CHANGE FROM VL -VERY LOW DENSITY TO L -LOW DENSITY WITH A PDO FOR CLUSTERING AND OPEN SPACE; A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 ACRES INTO 83 LOTS; AND A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) 16.2 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0131, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350- 017, 018, 019, 020) Action Minutes 081214 6 16.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0132, ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.254 THROUGH 17.22.266, INCLUSIVE, PDO -13 ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, TO CHAPTER 17.22 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO - 13, ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (OS) (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) 16.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0133, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36479 TO SUBDIVIDE 73 GROSS ACRES INTO 83 LOTS AND ASSOCIATED OPEN SPACE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) 16.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14-54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0134, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION FOR ARBOR VISTA LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350- 017, 018, 019, 020) By way of a PowerPoint presentation, Associate Planner, Matt Peters presented the staff report as per agenda material. The following individuals addressed the City Council on this item: • Daniel Gryclman • Tom Parnakian • Timmy Daniels • Ray Stann Action Minutes 081214 7 CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS 17 2015 Temecula Rod Run Planning and Implementation — Approved Staff Recommendation 17.1 (5-0-0) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. — Approved Staff Recommendation 17.2 (5-0-0) Council Member Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Naggar; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. Approved to revert back to the original corporate sponsorship program. RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Approve the planning and implementation of the 2015 Temecula Rod Run to be handled by City staff within the Community Services Department; 17.2 Discuss the provision of the City's Corporate Sponsorship Program that requires fifty percent (50%) of any and all sponsorship funds collected in conjunction with the 2015 Temecula Rod Run to be allocated to the City's Community Service Funding Account and determine whether to waive or retain or otherwise adjust this provision with respect to the 2015 Temecula Rod Run. 18 Ordinance Amending the City of Temecula's "Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls" (Ordinance No. 12-05) — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Council Member Comerchero made the motion; it was seconded by Council Member Washington; and electronic vote reflected approval by Council Members Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Edwards. RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 14-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.28.500 OF CHAPTER 8.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STORMWATER AND URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS AND FINDING THAT ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES CITY MANAGER REPORT (None) CITY ATTORNEY REPORT (None) Action Minutes 081214 8 ADJOURNMENT At 8:50 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 26, 2014, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Action Minutes 081214 9 Item No. 3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Jennifer Hennessy, Finance Director August 26, 2014 List of Demands PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Pascale Brown, Accounting Manager Pam Espinoza, Accounting Specialist That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 5,535,643.87. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/31/2014 TOTAL CHECK RUN $ 3,912,658.07 08/07/2014 TOTAL CHECK RUN 1,187,899.27 07/31/2014 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 435,086.53 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 08/26/2014 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 5,535,643.87 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 GENERAL FUND 135 BUSINESS INCUBATOR RESOURCE 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 166 SARDA HOUSING 170 MEASURE A FUND 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 477 CH)- RORIPAUGH 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C'7ONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT $ 420,702.81 389.93 718.85 6,795.12 1,362,501.88 213.84 255,459.94 57.27 1,095.11 3,489.62 6,541.81 711,554.43 55,922.29 40,476.71 7,154.96 63,149.32 160.30 2,133,668.88 2,805.00 215.72 2,058.54 200.80 30.02 152.87 61.83 64.70 4,778.13 26.49 29.13 28.00 3,590.95 195.38 84.54 30.71 817.32 27.50 213.46 85.08 6,733.11 3,356.17 30.85 29.45 4,270.68 28.46 125.12 32.56 191.81 209.89 $ 5,100,557.34 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 252,710.20 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 2,014.50 165 SARDA AFFORDABLE HOUSING 4,996.77 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 124,938.42 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 198.06 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D 1,887.82 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 'I," LAKE PARK MAINT. 425.98 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 888.18 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,314.06 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 26,166.42 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 5,815.75 340 FACILITIES 9,524.06 375 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM 771.69 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 89.45 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 59.99 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 71.41 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 13.00 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 144.46 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 26.15 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 37.12 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 245.30 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 2.49 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 11.07 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 7.57 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 163.75 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 34.86 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 20.26 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 17.71 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 40.73 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 3.54 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 151.64 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 81.15 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 219.94 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 372.01 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 8.89 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 9.76 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 209.38 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 67.41 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 3.07 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9.76 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 308.62 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 4.13 435,086.53 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 5,535,643.87 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 2495 07/30/2014 005460 U S BANK 2496 07/30/2014 005460 U S BANK 2497 07/31/2014 004236 JP MORGAN CHASE/WASHINGTON 2498 07/30/2014 005460 U S BANK 2499 07/30/2014 005460 U S BANK 2500 07/30/2014 005460 U S BANK Description Amount Paid Check Total '02 RDA debt service pmt 1,176,551.82 1,176,551.82 '11 RDA TABs Series A D/S pmt 755,981.03 755,981.03 Tem Gardens annual pledge fund pmt 305,000.00 305,000.00 '10 RDATABs Series B D/S pmt 332,133.35 332,133.35 '10 RDA TABs Series A D/S pmt 274,387.50 274,387.50 '06 RDATABs SeriesA D/S pmt 652,117.06 652,117.06 165928 07/31/2014 016764 ABM BUILDING SERVICES, LLC HVAC diagnostic inspection:city hall 59.65 HVAC diagnostic inspection:MPSC 74.56 HVAC diagnostic inspection:OT prkg gar 74.56 HVAC diag inspection:43200 Bus pk dr 119.30 HVAC diagnostic inspection:Civic Ctr 119.30 165929 07/31/2014 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT 165930 07/31/2014 016065 AMERICAN DIGITAL CORPORATION 165931 07/31/2014 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS 165932 07/31/2014 000101 APPLE ONE INC 165933 07/31/2014 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 165934 07/31/2014 004307 ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. 165935 07/31/2014 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE 165936 07/31/2014 012583 BLANCA YPRICE 165937 07/31/2014 006908 C C & COMPANY INC 447.37 asphalt products:street maint citywide 91.80 asphalt products:street maint citywide 529.71 621.51 TECH SVCS:TCC RENOVATION PROJ 444.00 444.00 STAFF CERT CARDS:AQUATICS PGRM 27.00 27.00 Temp help w/e 06/28 XB/LG/BP/ZZ 2,822.62 2,822.62 water system svcs:civic center 176.04 WATER SYSTEM SVCS:JEFFERSON REC 27.00 water system svcs:senior center 33.48 236.52 WATER QUALITY MAINT:HARVESTON, 3,900.00 3,900.00 DUCK POND veh & equip repairs:pw street maint 564.80 564.80 JUN LDSCP PLN CK/INSPECTION:PLNG 3,940.00 3,940.00 PERF:HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 8/1 275.00 PERFORMANCE:FACE PAINTING 7/31 250.00 525.00 Pagel apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 165938 07/31/2014 010939 CALIF DEPT OF INDUSTRIAL 115265 ELEVATOR INSP:TV MUSEUM 165939 07/31/2014 004241 CALIF DEPT OF STATE ARCHITECT 165940 07/31/2014 007146 CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORP Amount Paid Check Total 225.00 225.00 Remittance of SB1186 - QE Apr -Jun '14 579.00 Remittance of SB1186 - QE Apr -Jun '14 -405.30 Calsense data plan renewal:pw 3,000.00 173.70 3,000.00 165941 07/31/2014 017029 CHAIN, MICHAEL, A. Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1 600.00 600.00 165942 07/31/2014 014726 CHAPTER 13 STANDING SUPPORT PAYMENT 182.77 182.77 TRUSTEE 165943 07/31/2014 015090 CLEARWATER SYSTEMS CORP prey maint hvac h2o sys:civ ctr 550.00 emerg hvac repair:civic center 2,700.00 3,250.00 165944 07/31/2014 005447 CLEMENTS, BRIAN reimb:certification renewal:B&S 127.50 127.50 165945 07/31/2014 015082 COLEMAN, JONATHAN Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1 650.00 650.00 165946 07/31/2014 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL credit:LPS Iamp:PW -38.88 DIST. misc electrical supplies: var park sites 583.20 544.32 165947 07/31/2014 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD Instructor Earnings 133.87 133.87 165948 07/31/2014 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 THEATER HOSPITALITY & OFC SUPPLIES 165949 07/31/2014 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC TRAFFIC DATA COLLECTION:PW 162.36 162.36 3,000.00 3,000.00 165950 07/31/2014 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & install smoke detectors:jrc 2,010.00 HVAC INC hvac repairs:civic center 2,500.00 165951 07/31/2014 008810 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL& MAINT/REPAIR CCTV CAMERAS:PW 2,535.00 DATA TRAFFIC 165952 07/31/2014 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS PORT RESTROOMS:VAR CSD EVENTS 5,735.88 PORT RESTROOMS:VAR CSD EVENTS portable restroom rentals:var parks 2,870.00 4,510.00 2,535.00 52.80 8,658.68 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 165953 07/31/2014 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & LUBRICANTS (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Fuel for city vehicles:TCSD 433.44 Fuel for city vehicles:B&S Fuel for city vehicles:code enf FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES:B&S, PW Fuel for City vehicles:Bldg & Fuel for city vehicles:PW Ind dev Fuel for city vehicles:PW Traffic Fuel for city vehicles:PW Maint 165954 07/31/2014 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC VEHICLE RENTAL:TVM 165955 07/31/2014 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION 165956 07/31/2014 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE, INC. 165957 07/31/2014 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC 165958 07/31/2014 016989 FIRST TEAM PRODUCTIONS 165959 07/31/2014 003633 FOOTHILL EASTERN TRANSPORTN. 165960 07/31/2014 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 165961 07/31/2014 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 165962 07/31/2014 017050 FRANCO, ERNESTO 165963 07/31/2014 016436 FRICK, TRACY 165964 07/31/2014 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS 165965 07/31/2014 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC 239.21 149.60 2,032.19 1,082.74 163.83 205.61 827.49 5,134.11 255.94 255.94 JUN PLAN CHECK SVCS:B&S DEPT 6,323.88 MAY PLAN CHECK SVCS:B&S DEPT 10,956.46 17,280.34 replace irrig enclosure:villages slope 750.00 750.00 Jul express mail services 52.84 52.84 settlement:skytrooper 7/25 1,154.95 1,154.95 Tot roads usage: var depts 38.20 38.20 SUPPORT PAYMENT 100.00 100.00 SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00 50.00 Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1 500.00 500.00 reimb:misc supplies:history museum 188.06 188.06 SOUND/LIGHT SUPPLIES:THEATER 1,563.57 SOUND/LIGHT SUPPLIES:THEATER 855.31 2,418.88 SUPPLIES:TVM EXHIBITS 116.54 SUPPLIES:TVM EXHIBITS 165966 07/31/2014 005405 GILLILAND, ROBIN reimb:misc supplies:TCC 165967 07/31/2014 003592 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 310.42 426.96 139.76 139.76 ret w/h pmt:Jun const:main street bridge -2,366.54 JUN CONST:MAIN STREET BRIDGE 47,330.70 44,964.16 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 165968 07/31/2014 013107 GRANT, GLENN ANDREW ADVERTISING:HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 1,500.00 1,500.00 165969 07/31/2014 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL Aug 14 copier lease: central services 520.09 520.09 SVCS 165970 07/31/2014 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MISC SUPPLIES: PW TRAFFIC DIV 1,518.65 1,518.65 165971 07/31/2014 010210 HOME DEPOT SUPPLY INC, small tools & equip: parking garage 278.91 278.91 THE 165972 07/31/2014 004984 INDEPENDENT ROOFING credit:May roof consulting srvcs:TCC -6,130.00 CONSULTANT May roof consulting srvcs:TCC 7,790.00 1,660.00 165973 07/31/2014 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY pool sanitizing chemicals 525.53 525.53 INC 165974 07/31/2014 010676 INTERWEST CONSULTING CONSULTING SVCS:BUILDING 10,640.00 10,640.00 GROUP INC INSPECTOR 165975 07/31/2014 003296 INTL CODE COUNCIL MBRSHP DUES 40927009 WIGLE, E. 225.00 225.00 165976 07/31/2014 000198 INTL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING FY 14-15 ICSC mbrshp: Damko, C. 100.00 100.00 165977 07/31/2014 003266 IRON MOUNTAIN OFFSITE OFFSITE MEDIA STORAGE:CITY 613.14 613.14 CLERK 165978 07/31/2014 016633 JEFF MCNEAL PRODUCTIONS Performance: summer concert series 8/7 1,200.00 1,200.00 165979 07/31/2014 009336 KOPIE SHOP LLC PRINTING SVCS:CD COVERS:THEATER 165980 07/31/2014 014817 LAPP, JEREMY SCOTT 165981 07/31/2014 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 165982 07/31/2014 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC 165983 07/31/2014 006177 LONG, LISA 165984 07/31/2014 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE 638.15 638.15 ENTERTAINMENT:THEATER:CABERET 4,400.00 AT MERC settlement:caberet at Merc 7/27 1,427.25 5,827.25 Jun geotech services: main st. bridge 270.10 270.10 CPR CLASS SUPPLIES: MEDICS 5.25 5.25 Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1 600.00 600.00 Jul xxx-0346 general usage 30.51 Jul xxx-0714 gen usage:PD mall alarm 33.32 63.83 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 165985 07/31/2014 011956 MATTHEWS, AARON reimb:GIS user conf 7/14-18 338.40 338.40 165986 07/31/2014 013219 MATTHIES, FRANK H. performance:TVM 7/31 100.00 100.00 165987 07/31/2014 009835 MIRACLE PLAYGROUND SALES EMERG REPAIR PARTS:CROWNE HILL 732.90 732.90 INC PARK 165988 07/31/2014 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY, MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES:MPSC 204.34 204.34 INC 165989 07/31/2014 015164 NATURES IMAGE, INC JUN ENVIRO MITIGATION:FVP OVERCROSSING ret w/h pmt: f.v. interchg ret w/h pmt: pechanga pkwy Jun Pechanga pkwy environ mitigation 1,184.67 -59.23 -88.58 1,771.50 2,808.36 165990 07/31/2014 008820 NEIGHBORS NEWSPAPER Advertising:Hot Summer Nights 250.00 250.00 165991 07/31/2014 015122 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES, Jun satellite phone srvc:EOC/Fire 152.10 152.10 INC. 165992 07/31/2014 005656 PAPA Pesticide Appl. trng 9/18 K.Harrington 80.00 80.00 165993 07/31/2014 002800 PACIFIC STRIPING INC Pavement Rehab: bridge decks 3,467.00 3,467.00 165994 07/31/2014 016529 PIONEER CREDIT RECOVERY SUPPORT PAYMENT 66.07 66.07 INC 165995 07/31/2014 014957 PRN PRODUCTIONS Comedy @ the Merc 7/26/14 134.40 134.40 165996 07/31/2014 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT JUL WATER METER:30875 RANCHO VISTA Jul var water meters:PW var sites Jul var water meters:Fire Stns Jul var water meters:TCSD svc lev C 165997 07/31/2014 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS Reprographic srvcs:crc mechanic reno 165998 07/31/2014 000271 RBF CONSULTING MAY ENG SRVCS:I-15/SR-79 ULT INTRCHG 165999 07/31/2014 013759 RICE, KENNETH Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1 166000 07/31/2014 013250 RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF, Add'I youth court srvcs 5/8 & 6/11 SHERIFF 509.16 2,066.87 490.45 24,828.34 27,894.82 18.52 18.52 61,434.89 61,434.89 600.00 600.00 235.01 235.01 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 166001 07/31/2014 000277 5 & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC Supplies:CRC 166002 07/31/2014 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE Jun legal advertising - City Clerk/PW 166003 07/31/2014 013582 SAN DIEGUITO PUBLISHERS Printing srvcs:City Newsletter INC 166004 07/31/2014 016997 SECOND STREET OLD TOWN refund:eng grad dep:LD11-132CO LLC 166005 07/31/2014 008529 SHERIFF'S CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 166006 07/31/2014 008529 SHERIFFS CIVIL DIV - SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 166007 07/31/2014 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW public notice sign xx-0057: Planning 166008 07/31/2014 000824 SO CALIF ASSN OF FY 14/15 agency membership dues GOVERNMENTS 166009 07/31/2014 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 166010 07/31/2014 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 166011 07/31/2014 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC Jul 2-30-296-9522:46679 Primrose Ave Jul 2-30-099-3847:29721 Ryecrest Jul 2-35-164-3770:43487 Butterfield stg Jul 2-35-164-3663:42335 Meadows pkwy Jul 2-35-164-3515:32932 Leena way Jul 2-35-164-3242:44270 Meadows pkwy Jul 2-35-707-0010:33451 5 Hwy -79 Jul 2-33-357-5785:44747 Redhawk pkwy Jul 2-34-624-4452:32131 5 Loop rd lot Jul 2-28-331-4847:32805 Pauba rd LS3 Jul 095-167-7907-2:30650 Pauba Rd Jul 129-582-9784-3:43230 Bus prk dr Jul 021-725-0775-4:41845 6th St Jul 125-244-2108-3:30600 Pauba Rd Jul 091-024-9300-5:30875 Rancho vista Jul 026-671-2909-8:42051 Main St Amount Paid Check Total 109.90 423.36 4,933.12 78,000.00 300.00 227.75 109.90 423.36 4,933.12 78,000.00 300.00 227.75 191.40 191.40 9,830.00 9,830.00 414.84 27.66 30.58 27.90 28.09 29.62 59.07 34.19 1,001.34 111.29 166.34 32.50 70.97 15.78 372.26 25.91 Jun pest control srvcs:var facilities 625.00 pest control srvcs:tes pool pest control srvcs:pbsp pest control srvcs:north gen.kearney pest control srvcs:pbsp pest control srvcs:crc 94.00 92.00 94.00 70.00 94.00 1,764.58 683.76 1,069.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166012 07/31/2014 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Refreshments:summer day camp prgm 312.04 Refreshments:CRC 113.51 Refreshments:summer day camp prgm 311.04 736.59 Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166013 07/31/2014 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Misc office supplies:library 208.95 credit:misc office supplies:library -31.45 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CSD ADMIN 275.51 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CSD ADMIN 137.22 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CSD ADMIN 68.90 Misc office supplies:human services 19.48 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 4.19 Misc office supplies:library 47.28 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC 19.39 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC 2.15 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CRC 251.38 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 2.71 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CITY CLERK 147.40 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:RECORDS 198.22 Misc office supplies:pw npdes 80.69 Misc office supplies:pw land dev 270.21 Misc office supplies:pw traffic 418.79 Misc office supplies:library 60.98 credit:misc office supplies:library -42.80 Misc office supplies:library 721.50 Misc office supplies:library 27.24 Misc office supplies:library 4.71 Supplies:mpsc 32.39 Supplies:mpsc 30.23 Misc office supplies:library 34.13 Misc office supplies:library 18.26 Misc office supplies:pw cip 46.71 Misc office supplies:pw cip 52.90 Misc office supplies:pw cip 467.28 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 16.20 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:HR 11.25 office supplies:human services 326.71 office supplies:human services 78.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES:T. MUSEUM 129.72 Supplies:mpsc 9.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES:T. MUSEUM 133.93 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:SKATE PARK 144.87 Misc office supplies:sta 12 106.10 Misc office supplies:finance 74.51 Misc office supplies:finance 177.39 Misc office supplies:finance 54.98 Misc office supplies:finance 27.64 Misc office supplies:finance 25.60 office supplies:human services 24.95 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES:CSD ADMIN 19.48 Misc office supplies:sta 12 354.01 5,290.02 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 166014 07/31/2014 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS repair & maint srvcs:YMCA bldg 368.66 368.66 166015 07/31/2014 017117 SUMIDA, SUZANNE refund:balance on account 10.50 10.50 166016 07/31/2014 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES, Movie rental: movies in the park 7/18 399.00 399.00 INC. 166017 07/31/2014 013387 SWEEPING UNLIMITED INC Jul sweeping svcs:prkg structure 500.00 500.00 166018 07/31/2014 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD MISC SUPPLIES:THEATER 944.75 SRVCS Misc supplies:skate park 23.70 Misc supplies:tcc 534.34 Misc supplies:high hopes pgrm 43.07 Misc supplies:aquatics programs 242.15 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 377.56 Misc supplies:sports prgm 95.43 MISC SUPPLIES:FIT PRGM 48.78 Misc supplies:harveston center 148.26 2,458.04 166019 07/31/2014 010191 TAYLOR, JUDY Performance:T. Museum 150.00 150.00 166020 07/31/2014 012265 TEMECULA ACE HARDWARE park site maint suppl.:various sites 14.64 14.64 C/O 166021 07/31/2014 011090 TEMECULA VALLEY Transportation:day camp excursion 7/17 5,265.00 5,265.00 TRANSPORTATION 166022 07/31/2014 014963 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FY 13/14 pool/field maint fees:var sites 51,349.16 FY 13/14 pool/field maint fees:var sites 685.53 52,034.69 166023 07/31/2014 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE Aug high speed internet:41000 Main St 4,165.28 4,165.28 166024 07/31/2014 016796 TIME WARNER CABLE MEDIA ADVERTISING:STREET PAINTING 1,750.00 1,750.00 FESTIVAL 166025 07/31/2014 014413 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF SUPPORT PAYMENT EDUCATION 166026 07/31/2014 004261 VERIZON Jul xxx-8165 general usage Jul xxx-5072 general usage Jul xxx-0074 general usage Jul xxx-0073 general usage 267.11 267.11 100.50 1,951.16 3,088.83 165.54 5,306.03 Page apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166027 07/31/2014 004789 VERIZON (Continued) Description Jul Internet svcs:civic center Jul Internet svcs:mpsc Jul Internet svcs:Library Jul Internet svcs:Tem PD DSL Jul Internet svcs:28816 Pujol St Amount Paid Check Total 289.99 144.99 184.99 49.99 129.99 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 799.95 3,912,658.07 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 07/31/2014 2:12:19PM CITY OF TEMECULA 106 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 3,912,658.07 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 2490 07/31/2014 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT 2491 07/31/2014 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT) 2492 07/31/2014 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 2493 07/31/2014 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Description Amount Paid Check Total SUPPORT PAYMENT 1,439.52 1,439.52 PERS BUY BACK PRE TAX PAYMENT 39,589.13 39,589.13 OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 5,770.44 5,770.44 PAYMENT FEDERAL INCOME TAXES PAYMENT 79,244.72 79,244.72 2494 07/31/2014 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE DISABILITY INS PAYMENT 21,751.56 21,751.56 166028 08/01/2014 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Jul Dj srvcs:Summer Concert Series 3,150.00 3,150.00 166029 08/01/2014 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Jul Dj srvcs:Movies in the Park 2,800.00 2,800.00 166030 08/01/2014 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC Dj srvcs:4th of July Extravaganza 16,000.00 16,000.00 166031 08/07/2014 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI TCSD instructor earnings 630.00 630.00 166032 08/07/2014 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL Police K-9 monthly training 283.34 283.34 INC 166033 08/07/2014 014170 AHERN RENTALS INC ANNUAL INSP THEATER GENIE 190.00 190.00 SCISSOR LIFT 166034 08/07/2014 016450 AIR EXCHANGE, INC. Plymovent Maintenance: Stations 623.88 623.88 166035 08/07/2014 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT asphalt products:street maint citywide asphalt products:street maint citywide asphalt products:street maint citywide 166036 08/07/2014 017121 ALUIA, SUSAN refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 166037 08/07/2014 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY CORPORATION 108.21 208.26 128.70 445.17 200.00 200.00 Signal batteries: pw traffic 1,276.74 Signal batteries: pw traffic 628.78 Signal batteries: pw traffic 166038 08/07/2014 016065 AMERICAN DIGITAL Palo Alto firewall sub renewal:info tech CORPORATION 2,158.24 4,063.76 4,943.84 4,943.84 Pagel apChkLst 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166039 08/07/2014 004431 AMERICAN PAYROLL INSTITUTE INC 166040 08/07/2014 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS 166041 08/07/2014 000101 APPLE ONE INC 166042 08/07/2014 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO 166043 08/07/2014 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC 166044 08/07/2014 017127 ASSCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL 166045 08/07/2014 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO 166046 08/07/2014 015915 BARNETT, MYRON A. 166047 08/07/2014 014284 BLAKELY'S TRUCK SERVICE 166048 08/07/2014 003048 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB 166049 08/07/2014 017115 BUREAU OF OFFICE SERVICES, INC 166050 08/07/2014 006908 C C & COMPANY INC 166051 08/07/2014 004462 C D W GOVERNMENT INC 166052 08/07/2014 011383 CAL STATE SAN MARCOS UARSC (Continued) Description 14/15 APA mb: Jorgenson, Monica Jun 14 Animal control srvcs:temecula Billing Adj: charged for overtime in Temp help w/e 06/30 XB/LG/BP/ZZ Aug 14 Water sys srvcs:police of ofc pool chlorination supplies: tes pool Membership: West Dale TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings Perf:Hot Summer Nights 2014 08/08/14 veh maint and repair:street maint refund:sec dep:multipurpose rm:CRC Jun 14 transciption svcs: police dept Performances:Hot Summer Nights COMPUTER SUPPLIES:LIBRARY Zebra RW420 USB Zebra RW 420 vehicle cradle w/cable Ergonomic arm extension for desk: HR ergonomic office equipment: Kitzerow, C MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP:INFO TECF Computer MonitorArm:M Board desk Envir Acad Sep,Oct,Nov Peters, Matt 166053 08/07/2014 004248 CALIF DEPT OF Jun 14 DOJ alcohol analysis: police JUSTICE-ACCTING Amount Paid Check Total 219.00 10,000.00 -24.62 9,447 83 27.00 1,568.16 150.00 210.00 245.00 600.00 845.77 200.00 149.49 275.00 86.01 -673.35 -246.72 166.77 214.58 989.02 279.32 395.00 219.00 10,000.00 9,423.21 27.00 1,568.16 150.00 455.00 600.00 845.77 200.00 149.49 275.00 815.63 395.00 1,120.00 1,120.00 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 166054 08/07/2014 017132 CANINE SUPPORT TEAMS, INC. '14 Rod Run Drifters Car Club admin fee 166055 08/07/2014 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Aug 14 Copier Lease - Civic Center INC 166056 08/07/2014 017029 CHAIN, MICHAEL, A. PERFORMANCE:HOT SUMMER NIGHTS 8/15 166057 08/07/2014 005417 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY first aid cabinet: jrc 166058 08/07/2014 003997 COAST RECREATION INC 166059 08/07/2014 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS 166060 08/07/2014 017120 CONSTRUCTION EXAM CENTER 166061 08/07/2014 011922 CORELOGIC, INC. 166062 08/07/2014 013379 COSSOU, CELINE Amount Paid Check Total 2,500.00 2,500.00 3,004.54 3,004.54 600.00 600.00 302.30 302.30 playground equip parts:serena hills park 287.44 287.44 security alarm repair srvcs: crc 75.00 75.00 CBO legal/mgmt 9/8-12 Lankenau, Steve 795.00 795.00 7/1-6/30/15 Web subscr Code Enf 2,820.00 2,820.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 166063 08/07/2014 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA #491 Misc supplies:human services pgrm 714.00 535.50 654.50 654.50 773.50 3,332.00 345.93 345.93 166064 08/07/2014 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA#491 Misc pgrm supplies:human services 143.23 Misc supplies:history museum 82.90 226.13 166065 08/07/2014 017040 COTO, MICHELLE refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 200.00 200.00 166066 08/07/2014 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC repair yard access gate: foc 2,323.60 emerg plumbing srvcs: civic center install shower: crc pool rehab emerg plumbing srvc:tcc/food pantry plumbing srvcs: paloma del sol park 166067 08/07/2014 000209 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES Equipment Maint: Sta 73 166068 08/07/2014 001393 DATA TICKET, INC. Jun 14 Parking citation Jan 14 Parking citation Feb 14 Parking citation 430.96 5,400.00 280.00 691.23 9,125.79 75.00 75.00 1,544.50 1,660.10 1,533.58 4,738.18 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 166069 08/07/2014 007057 DERNBACH, ESTHER MARIE TCSD instructor earnings 166070 08/07/2014 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL & Fuel for City vehicles: police dept LUBRICANTS 166071 08/07/2014 009594 DULCHICELLA Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/1/14 166072 08/07/2014 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS Plaques with engraved plate INC 166073 08/07/2014 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER Jul water meter:32131 S Loop rd bldg DIST Jul water meter:32131 S Loops rd Idsc Jul water meter:32131 S Loop Rd dcda 166074 08/07/2014 004068 ECALDRE MANALILI-DE VILLA, TCSD Instructor Earnings AILEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings Amount Paid Check Total 577.50 84.39 600.00 380.43 88.57 313.63 43.50 236.25 252.00 362.25 220.50 236.25 173.25 315.00 267.75 267.75 189.00 253.97 577.50 84.39 600.00 380.43 445.70 2,773.97 166075 08/07/2014 011202 EMH SPORTS USA, INC TCSD instructor earnings 504.00 TCSD instructor earnings 472.50 TCSD instructor earnings 1,383.20 TCSD instructor earnings 420.00 TCSD instructor earnings 982.80 TCSD instructor earnings 892.50 4,655.00 166076 08/07/2014 005115 ENTERPRISE RENT A CAR INC Vehicle rental:summer day camp pgrm 127.97 127.97 166077 08/07/2014 011292 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Jun Supplemental EIR:tem valley hospital 7,523.50 7,523.50 ASSOC. 166078 08/07/2014 009953 FEDERAL CLEANING Jul 14 Janitorial srvcs:police mall 855.00 855.00 CONTRACTORS 166079 08/07/2014 014865 FEIZE UHLER, KIMBERLY Promo items:eco dev pgrm 1,258.32 1,258.32 166080 08/07/2014 011145 FOSTER, JILL CHRISTINE TCSD instructor earnings 2,240.00 2,240.00 Page:4 apChkLst 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166081 08/07/2014 004074 FRANCHISE MGMT SERVICES INC 166082 08/07/2014 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS-CAREERTRAC 166083 08/07/2014 001937 GALLS INC 166084 08/07/2014 016519 GARIBAY, ISAAC 166085 08/07/2014 013076 GAUDET, YVONNE M. 166086 08/07/2014 005405 GILLILAND, ROBIN 166087 08/07/2014 009608 GOLDEN VALLEY MUSIC SOCIETY 166088 08/07/2014 015451 GREATAMERICA FINANCIAL SVCS 166089 08/07/2014 014402 GROEPPER, BROOKE ELIZABETH 166090 08/07/2014 017088 HARMON, JEFFERY G 166091 08/07/2014 012204 HERITAGE FAMILY MINISTRIES 166092 08/07/2014 011228 INLAND PLANNING AND DESIGN INC 166093 08/07/2014 003296 INTL CODE COUNCIL 166094 08/07/2014 014692 JOHNSON, BARBARA KATHLEEN 166095 08/07/2014 017118 KRACH, BREE B. (Continued) Description Misc supplies:high hopes pgrm Pryor Proof Reading Seminar:b&s dept Misc supplies:Police volunteers reimb: ipad case: Garibay, Isaac TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings reimb: food for sister city breakfast reimb: items for tcc reimbursement: items needed for tcc Settlement:Classics...Merc July 2014 Aug 14 copier lease incubator: Econ Dev Jul 14 Copier Lease: Central Svcs TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings May/Jun Design guidelines:Uptown Jeffsn CA CODE GUIDELINES:B&S DEPT CalDag 2013 Access Manuals: B&S TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings recognition awards:lifeguard prgm Council chamber name/title plates Theater volunteer name badges Recognition plaque:C. Fox Sister City Daisen memorial plaque Recognition plaques:Y.A.C. Medals & plaques:Y.A.C. Amount Paid Check Total 79.41 199.00 29.16 64.79 1,463.00 1,396.50 67.74 50.75 381.77 564.90 289.44 1,341.70 1,575.00 840.00 770.00 3,402.00 4,063.50 1,200.00 309.55 159.77 176.40 205.80 113.40 36.18 97.20 77.76 1,500.00 245.65 175.50 79.41 199.00 29.16 64.79 2,859.50 500.26 564.90 1,631.14 1,575.00 1,610.00 7,465.50 1,200.00 469.32 382.20 2,245.69 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 166096 08/07/2014 016404 KRAVETSKY, III, ALEXANDER A. Perf: Hot Summer Nights 08/08/14 Amount Paid Check Total 500.00 500.00 166097 08/07/2014 017125 LAWLOR, DANIEL J. Perf: Skinny Lips & Sound Malfuction 970.40 970.40 166098 08/07/2014 004412 LEANDER, KERRY D. TCSD instructor earnings TCSD instructor earnings 166099 08/07/2014 013718 LEE, RICHARD M. Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/15 166100 08/07/2014 006177 LONG, LISA Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/15 166101 08/07/2014 004813 M & J PAUL ENTERPRISES INC RENTALS:CITYWIDE SPECIAL EVENTS 166102 08/07/2014 014431 MARTLAND, BETTE B 166103 08/07/2014 017122 MCCOY, ADRIANA 166104 08/07/2014 015259 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS, INC. 166105 08/07/2014 012962 MILLER, MISTY RENTALS:CITYWIDE 4TH OF JULY TCSD Instructor Earnings refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston Household Battery recycling program. Household Battery recycling program. TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 166106 08/07/2014 001868 MIYAMOTO-JURKOSKY, SUSAN TCSD Instructor Earnings ANN 1,085.00 714.00 1,799.00 650.00 650.00 600.00 600.00 295.00 3,495.00 3,790.00 380.63 380.63 150.00 150.00 324.52 270.56 595.08 420.00 420.00 591.50 1,431.50 338.10 338.10 166107 08/07/2014 004040 MORAMARCO, ANTHONY, J. TCSD instructor earnings 535.50 TCSD instructor earnings 168.00 TCSD instructor earnings 525.00 TCSD instructor earnings 654.50 TCSD instructor earnings 1,751.75 3,634.75 166108 08/07/2014 017090 N2 PUBLISHING, INC. Theater Advertising: Bear Creek 1,299.00 1,299.00 166109 08/07/2014 002292 OASIS VENDING coffee/kitchen supplies:civic center 258.97 258.97 166110 08/07/2014 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS Printing srvcs:PD business cards 50.63 50.63 DIV 166111 08/07/2014 017126 OLD TOWN PLAZA, LLC Facade Impry Prgm Agrmnt Rebate 15,000.00 15,000.00 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 166112 08/07/2014 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Maint Svcs:pw parks maint 200.00 City Vehicle Maint Svcs:pw parks maint 56.75 256.75 166113 08/07/2014 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS:TCSD 126.69 126.69 166114 08/07/2014 007959 ONEIL SOFTWARE INC Bar coding software lic renew:city clerk 1,286.51 1,286.51 166115 08/07/2014 013115 PETERSON NUGENT, KRISTIN TCSD Instructor Earnings 291.20 166116 08/07/2014 000249 PETTY CASH 166117 08/07/2014 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS INC 166118 08/07/2014 010338 POOL & ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS INC 166119 08/07/2014 014494 R & R CONTROLS, INC 166120 08/07/2014 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DISTRICT 166121 08/07/2014 005383 RANCHO SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER TCSD Instructor Earnings 436.80 728.00 Petty Cash Reimbursement 586.41 586.41 swimming pool chlorine pump: tes pool 597.73 597.73 misc fountain supplies: civic center 39.71 mist pool supplies: var pool sites 462.08 501.79 supervisor Iicense:City facs 1,357.00 1,357.00 Jul Recl.lscp water meter:jefferson ave 54.92 54.92 Jun assault exams:temecula police 1,800.00 1,800.00 166122 08/07/2014 000907 RANCHO TEMECULA CAR May veh detailing srvcs:var depts 84.00 WASH Jun vehicle detailing srvcs:pw depts 21.00 105.00 166123 08/07/2014 017129 RASMUSSEN, KARRA refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 200.00 200.00 166124 08/07/2014 017124 RAYA, SERGIO Computer purchase prgm 2,000.00 2,000.00 166125 08/07/2014 002412 RICHARDS WATSON & Jun 2014 legal services 84,637.05 84,637.05 GERSHON 166126 08/07/2014 010087 RIGGS & RIGGS INC Appraisal srvcs:Diaz Rd/Dendy Pkwy 3,000.00 3,000.00 166127 08/07/2014 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO Jun emerg. radio rental:police 5,227.92 5,227.92 TECHNOLOGY 166128 08/07/2014 000955 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW 4th of July patrol srvcs 14,464.35 14,464.35 STN Page:7 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166129 08/07/2014 014347 ROBERTS, PATRICIA G. 166130 08/07/2014 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. 166131 08/07/2014 004254 ROGUE DEVILLES, THE 166132 08/07/2014 012251 ROTH, DONALD J. (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total TCSD Instructor Earnings 367.50 TCSD Instructor Earnings 420.00 787.50 reimb: NLC Summer Policy forum 7/23-26 699.40 699.40 Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/8 500.00 500.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 504.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 189.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 630.00 1,323.00 166133 08/07/2014 015646 SALTY SUITES Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/8 650.00 650.00 166134 08/07/2014 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE 07/20/14-07/19/15 subscr:PW 4754556 180.92 08/17/14-08/16/15 subscr:Pln 4754565 180.92 361.84 166135 08/07/2014 017123 SCHUMAN ENTERPRISES LLC refund:sec dep:PHBSP soccer field #1 800.00 800.00 DBA 166136 08/07/2014 013376 SECURITY SIGNAL DEVICES Repair & maint of cameras:prkg structure 3,051.64 3,051.64 INC 166137 08/07/2014 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC Jazz @ the Merc 7/24 483.00 483.00 166138 08/07/2014 004498 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. May traffic sgnl repair & maint:pw 440.52 166139 08/07/2014 000645 SMART & FINAL INC Traffic sgnl repair & maint:pw traffic 4,044.56 4,485.08 Misc pgrm supplies:human services 89.24 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 166140 08/07/2014 003002 SMOOTHILL SPORTS Supplies and pads:Skate Park DISTRIBUTORS 53.98 143.22 748.20 748.20 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166142 08/07/2014 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 166143 08/07/2014 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Jul 2-31-404-6020:28771 Old town front 1,189.09 Jul 2-31-419-2873:43000 Hwy -395 25.60 Jul 2-29-657-2787:41638 Winchester 25.75 Jul 2-30-220-8749:45850 N Wolf crk dr 270.85 Jul 2-29-953-8447:31738 Wolf vly rd 27.98 Jul 2-29-807-1093:28079 Diaz Rd PED 26.51 Jul 2-29-807-1226:28077 Diaz Rd PED 26.50 Jul 2-31-536-3481:41902 Main St 221.16 Jul 2-29-223-8607:42035 2nd St PED 812.08 Jul 2-31-536-3655:41904 Main St 1,427.82 Jul 2-00-397-5067:TCSD svc lev C 2,741.34 Jul 2-29-295-3510:32211 Wolf vly rd 2,090.92 Jul 2-29-224-0173:32364 Overland Trl 2,748.81 Jul 2-31-536-3226:28690 Mercedes St 2,079.46 Jul 2-34-333-3589:41702 Main St 26.85 Jul 2-31-282-0665:27407 Diaz Rd PED 27.11 Jul 2-29-953-8249:46497 Wolf crk dr 31.28 Jul 2-29-953-8082:31523 Wolf vly rd 32.61 Jul 2-36-641-3839:27498 Enterprise Cir W 30.49 Jul 2-35-074-2847:26902 Jefferson Ave 49.40 Jul 2-36-641-3912:27498 Enterprise Cir W 41.40 Jul 2-28-904-7706:32329 Overland Trl 139.38 Jul 2-21-981-4720:30153 Tem pkwy tpp 22.40 Jul 2-30-520-4414:32781 Tem pkwy LS3 1,068.33 Jul 2-31-912-7494:28690 Mercedes St 2,085.50 Jul 2-35-664-9053:29119 Margarita Rd 352.08 Jul 2-25-393-4681:41951 Moraga Rd 936.87 Jul 2-02-351-4946:41845 6th St 2,149.70 Jul 2-14-204-1615:30027 Front st rdio 57.24 Jul 2-18-937-3152:28314 Mercedes St 1,116.40 Jul 2-19-171-8568:28300 Mercedes St 101.64 Jul 2-29-933-3831:43230 Bus park dr 2,617.10 Jul 2-00-397-5042:43200 Bus park dr #1 5,880.05 Jul 2-32-903-8293:41000 Main St 29,525.13 Jul 2-29-657-2332:45538 Redwood Rd 28.16 Jul 2-31-031-2616:27991 Diaz Rd PED 26.93 Jul 091-085-1632-0:41951 Moraga Rd Jul 196-025-0344-3:42081 Main St Jul 129-535-4236-7:41000 Main St Jul 133-040-7373-0:43210 Bus park dr Jul 028-025-1468-3:41375 McCabe Ct Jul 181-383-8881-6:28314 Mercedes St Jul 101-525-0950-0:28816 Pujol St Jul 055-461-2483-4:40135 Village Rd Jul 101-525-1560-6:27415 Enterprise cir Jul 117-188-6393-6:32131 S Loop Rd 654.07 1.11 1,410.17 20.17 21.28 21.28 19.08 20.29 69.76 45.09 60,059.92 2,282.30 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 08/07/2014 2:48:00PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166144 08/07/2014 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 166145 08/07/2014 015261 SP6 US RETAIL SOURCE 166146 08/07/2014 005786 SPRINT 166147 08/07/2014 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total eradicate bees:paloma del sol park 7/15 94.00 eradicate bees:redhawk park 94.00 eradicate bees: various parks 94.00 eradicate bees:paloma del sol park 7/16 94.00 376.00 Acrylic display boxes & risers:tvm 196.43 196.43 Jun 26 - Jul 25 cellular usage/equip 4,978.90 4,978.90 Misc office supplies:police mall office 300.74 Misc office supplies:police old town Misc office supplies:police old town Misc office supplies:police old town Misc office supplies:police mall office 166148 08/07/2014 002015 STAR WAY PRODUCTIONS EMERG REPAIRS: OLD TOWN SOUND SYSTEM 166149 08/07/2014 016262 STEVE ADAMIAK GOLF INSTRUCTION 44.17 103.38 178.83 82.77 709.89 6,238.90 6,238.90 TCSD Instructor Earnings 560.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 511.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 762.30 TCSD Instructor Earnings 252.00 2,085.30 166150 08/07/2014 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES, Movie rental: movies in the park 8/02 324.00 324.00 INC. 166151 08/07/2014 010924 T & D COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Cabling srvcs: tcc 166152 08/07/2014 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL 166153 08/07/2014 000305 TARGET BANK BUS CARD SRVCS 166154 08/07/2014 014785 TEDDE, H, ROBERT MAR -JUN CONSULTING SRVCS:F.VLY PKWY/I15 MAR -JUN CONSULTING SRVCS:WNCHS- 260.00 260.00 389,665.32 189, 077.01 Misc supplies:tcc 76.06 578,742.33 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 2.60 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 36.48 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 134.25 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 122.77 Misc supplies:summer day camp pgrm 28.35 Misc supplies:theater 27.25 Misc supplies:mpsc 43.41 Misc supplies:tcc 172.74 643.91 Performance:summer concert series 8/14 1,800.00 1,800.00 166155 08/07/2014 017131 TEMECULA HILLS CHRISTIAN refund:sec dep:picnic rental:RRSP 200.00 200.00 Pagel 0 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 11 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank : union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor 166156 08/07/2014 003677 TEMECULA MOTORSPORTS LLC 166157 08/07/2014 004190 TEMECULA VALLEY FILM FESTIVAL 166158 08/07/2014 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SUPPLY 166159 08/07/2014 011090 TEMECULA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION 166160 08/07/2014 017130 THOMAS, JOHN 166161 08/07/2014 000319 TOMARK SPORTS INC 166162 08/07/2014 002702 U S POSTAL SERVICE 166163 08/07/2014 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 166164 08/07/2014 004794 VALLEY WINDS COMMUNITY 166165 08/07/2014 004261 VERIZON 166166 08/07/2014 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 166167 08/07/2014 009101 VISION ONE INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE 176.12 MOTORCYCLES VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE MOTORC' 306.98 VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE MOTORC' 104.64 VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE MOTORC' 599.45 VEH REPAIR & MAINT:POLICE MOTORC' 466.93 1,654.12 FY 14/15 sponsorship funding 10,000.00 10,000.00 Misc maint supplies: var park sites 200.40 200.40 Transportation:day camp excursion 7/31 4,275.00 4,275.00 refund:sec dep:rm rental:Harveston 200.00 200.00 tennis court nets:great oak high school 481.96 481.96 May '14 postage meter deposit 2,464.48 Jun '14 postage meter deposit 1,927.69 4,392.17 May undrgmd svcs alert tickets:PW 195.00 Jul underground utility locator: pw 229.50 424.50 Performance:Hot Summer Nights 8/15 250.00 250.00 Jul xxx-2886 general usage:Harveston 120.92 120.92 6/16-7/15 Broadband usage:citywide 2,357.43 2,357.43 Jun ShoWare ticketing srvcs:Theater 2,368.00 2,368.00 166168 08/07/2014 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC Tree maint srvcs:City r-o-w's Tree maint srvcs:harveston slopes Tree maint srvcs:wnchstr rd medians Tree maint srvcs:wnchstr slopes Tree maint srvcs:slopes/harv.lake tree maint srvcs:various slopes 166169 08/07/2014 009512 WURMS JANITORIAL SERVICES, INC 166170 08/07/2014 005195 ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 20,209.00 2,625.00 2,000.00 1,848.00 1,560.00 6,685.00 34,927.00 Aug janitorial svcs:City facs 22,477.28 Aug janitorial srvcs:police old town stn 269.57 22,746.85 Excursion:summer day camp pgrm 7/17 3,998.40 3,998.40 Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,187, 899.27 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 08/07/2014 2:48:OOPM CITY OF TEMECULA 147 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks. 1,187,899.27 Page:13 Item No. 4 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager Seer - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement for the 16th Annual Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure PREPARED BY: Christine Damko, Economic Development Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship and Economic Development Funding Agreement with the Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, in the amount $15,058 for in-kind city support services, $10,865 for in-kind promotional services, and $22,500 in cash for the October 19, 2014, Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure event. BACKGROUND: The City Council Economic Development Committee (Council Members Ron Roberts and Chuck Washington) met on March 26, 2014, to review the Economic Development Sponsorship applications for FY 2014-2015 and the Committee recommended to continue supporting and sponsoring the Susan G. Komen Race. Support for this event was also approved by the full City Council. Since 1982, Komen has played a critical role in every major advancement in the fight against breast cancer, transforming how the world talks about and treats this disease, and helping to turn millions of breast cancer patients into breast cancer survivors. Some of these advancements include 1) earlier detection and more effective treatments, 2) increase in the 5 -year survival rate from 74%to 99% for women with early diagnoses, 3) increase in research funds from $30 million in 1982 to $850 million currently, and 4) more breast cancer survivors, (about 3 million), the largest group of cancer survivors in the U.S. Based on a written report provided by Susan G. Komen Inland Empire, the 2013 Race had a turnout of 9,392 participants, 589 breast cancer survivors and raised over $786,899 with the help of 600 volunteers. Seventy-five percent of the net proceeds remain in the service area for mission, education and outreach programs such as Prayer in Pink, as well as reinvesting in the community grants (2014-15) in the amount of $260,000. The remaining 25 percent supports The Susan G. Komen Grants Award Program where the Affiliate invested approximately $173,000 in research from race revenue. The 2014 Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure is scheduled for October 19, 2014, and will maintain the same format as in previous years. The race will be held at the Promenade Mall and will include an Expo, Survivor Breakfast and Activities, 5K Fun Run/Walk, a 1.5 Mile Family Fun Run/Walk and a Kids Only (10 years or younger) Fun Run. In order to further the Susan G. Komen organization cause and provide additional awareness of the disease, the City will work with Komen officials to plan an event to be held on October 19, 2014. Approximately 800 breast cancer survivors will be invited to attend a candlelight vigil in front of the Temecula Civic Center. Komen officials hope to have an art piece entitled the "Wall of Hope" at the event. The mobile art piece will be on loan to the City and it will be rotated to various City facilities throughout the month. The City will also kick-off the first day, of a month long illumination, of the Civic Center in pink. The pink lighting will be to honor the cancer survivors and a reminder that October is National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. The City anticipates an additional sponsorship for the lighting costs in the approximate amount of $5,000, if a corporate sponsor is not available. Public Works (street closures), Police (traffic control) and Fire (standby emergency medical services) staff in-kind services are valued at $15,058. The in-kind promotional services valued at $10,865 will include event information on the City's website, Channel 3, City News Letter and Temecula Auto Mall Marquee. The $22,500 cash donation will be used to provide breast health services for the medically underserved residents of the Inland Empire. FISCAL IMPACT: The in-kind City staffing costs of $15,058 and the in-kind promotional services costs of $10,865 for this event is provided in the Fiscal Year 2014-15 City of Temecula Operational Budgets. Funding for the $22,500 cash donation is provided through the Fiscal Year 2014/15 operating budget. The $5,000 Civic Center lighting expenses can be absorbed within the Fiscal Year 2014/15 Budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE INLAND EMPIRE AFFILIATE OF SUSAN G. KOMEN FOR THE CURE THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 26th day of August, 2014, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and The Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") on October 19, 2014. The Event is a special event which is located in and around the Promenade Mall in the City of Temecula. b. The Event includes a Code Timed Run, a Coed 5K Run/Walk, a Family one -Mile Fun Run/Walk, a Kids Only Run (10 years and younger), live entertainment, exhibits, Kids' Expo, Komen Expo, Sleep in for the Cureand Breast Cancer Survivor Tribute. c. Alcohol "will not" be served. d. The City desires to be a Diamond Sponsor of the Event by providing Economic Development Funding and City Support Services. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 26, 2014, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than January 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Fifteen Thousand Fifty Eight Dollars and No Cents ($15,058.00) and in-kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Ten Thousand Eight Hundred Sixty Five Dollars and No Cents ($10,865.00), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Diamond Sponsor of the Event. As a Diamond Sponsor, the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. b. The City of Temecula shall also provide Economic Development Funding in the amount of Twenty Two Thousand Five Hudred Dollars and No Cents ($22,500.00) cash which will be allocated to pay for breast exams, counseling, and other services for underserved Inland Empire residents. 4. WRITTEN REPORT By Janaury 31, 2015, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Diamond Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. FINANCIAL REVIEW The Nonprofit shall provide complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event. This financial review of the Event should be completed and submitted to the City no later than January 31, 2015. The financial review shall provide a general summary report on how funds were expended and used to the benefit of Southwest Riverside residents and shall include documentation, including but not limited to lists of grant recipients and Mission programs in the affilitate service area. The financial documentation is subject to an audit, as determined by City staff. Seventy-five percent of net funds raised from the Inland Empire Race for the Cure and other donations remain in our service area for mission programs, while the other 25% supports the National Komen Research Program. 6. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file applications for a Temporary Use Permit and Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval of the permits. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Temporary Use Permit, the Special Event Permit, or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 7. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 9. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by September 2, 2014, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 12. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: To Recipient: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 The Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure Inland Empire Affiliate President 43397 Business Park Drive #D-9 Temecula, CA 92592 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 16. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA The Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen for the Cure (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk Inland Empire Affiliate Co -Race Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney NONPROFIT Debbie Gilligan Inland Empire Affiliate President Cindy Golden or Cindy Fitch The Inland Empire Affiliate of Susan G. Komen For the Cure Debbie Gilligan 43397 Business Park Drive #D-9 Temecula, CA 92590 PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA'S SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS DIAMOND SPONSOR In exchange for providing in-kind city -support services of Public Works, Fire and Police valued at an amount not to exceed $15,058.00, and in-kind City promotional services valued at $10,865.00 for the Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure, the citizens of the City of Temecula shall receive the following benefits. ♦ City of Temecula Logo on Printed Material: i.e. 1,000 Race Posters, 10,000 Race Entry Forms ♦ City of Temecula Logo on 10,000 Event T-shirts ♦ City of Temecula Name on all Radio Promotion ♦ Complimentary Booth Space at Expo: 10 x 10 booth space for City of Temecula booth at Expo ♦ 4 City of Temecula Banners Displayed ♦ City of Temecula Name in all Press Releases ♦ City of Temecula Logo in Race related Online Communication ♦ Complimentary Sponsor Appreciation Dinner Tickets (10) ♦ Commemorative Sponsor Award ♦ 10 Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure Entries and T-shirts ♦ City of Temecula Logo in newspaper "Thank You" Ad ♦ Complimentary Team Tailgate Booth The cash donation of twenty-two thousand, five hundred dollars ($22,500.00) will help fund organizations that offer breast cancer education, treatment support and diagnostic services for education, treatment support, uninsured and underserved residents. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Komen Empire Race for the Cure event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $9,000 Fire: $3,500 Public Works: $2,558 Total In -Kind Value: $15,058 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the 2014 Komen Inland Empire Race for the Cure event is as follows: Item Value City E-Ietter E-Ietters are sent out each month to approximately 2,500 residents Local Governnent Channel 3 Cable Channel Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 3 seconds Auto Mall Marque Appears approximately once every 4 1/2 minutes City Website Event listing on the City of Temecula Webside $ 450.00 $5,100.00 $3,115.00 $2,200.00 Promotional In -Kind Value: $10,865.00 Economic Development Cash Donation: $22,500.00 Item No. 5 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Sponsorship Agreement with Veterans Supplemental Support Network for the Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Recreation Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with the Veterans Supplemental Support Network for city -support costs, in the amount of $6,830, and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the 2014 Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a sponsorship request from the Veterans Supplemental Support Network to provide city -support costs for the 2014 Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair to be held September 27, 2014. The Economic Development Sub - Committee of the City Council (Council Members Roberts and Washington) met on March 26, 2014 to review the budget on this special event and recommended support at the levels indicated in the staff report. The event will serve as a fundraiser with the Veterans Supplemental Support Network (VSSN), a local non-profit that provides services to veterans and their dependents. VSSN's mission is to end and prevent homelessness, hunger and hardship among veterans, military and/or their family members. Each VSSN chapter, across the world, is an alliance of concerned community members who leverage resources and volunteer efforts to develop supplemental support for our heroes. VSSN provides resources to 238 Veteran Centers nationwide and serves over 1,900 families in the southwest region of Riverside County. The Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair will be held on September 27, 2014 in Town Square Park, Civic Quad and the Conference Center. The charity bicycle rides will start from the Civic Center at 7:15am with a 62, 30 and 15 mile ride. The glow fair will take place from 5:OOpm-10:OOpm and will include games for kids, carnival -style booths, live entertainment, over $5,000 in give -a -ways, food and informational vendors, a beer & wine garden and free food for the first 300 heroes and their families, with proper ID. Admission is free to the public and everyone is encouraged to attend and show your support of our local heroes. FISCAL IMPACT: The City -support costs of $6,830 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2014-15 Operating Budget of the various supporting departments. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND VETERANS SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT NETWORK THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 26th day of August, 2014, by and between the City of Temecula a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Veterans Supplemental Support Network, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") on September 27, 2014. The Event is a special event which is located in Old Town Temecula. b. The Event includes, live music, carnival style booths, food trucks, and community resource information. c. Alcohol will be served. d. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 26, 2014, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than September 30, 2014, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Six Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty Dollars and No Cents ($6,830) and in-kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415) as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co -Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file an application for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 6. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 7. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 8. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by September 8, 2014, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Liquor Liability for bodily injury, personal injury and property damages. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Liquor Liability: One million ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 9. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 12. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: To Recipient: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Veterans Supplemental Support Network Attn: Daisy Tate 41593 Winchester Road Ste 200 Temecula, CA 92590 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 14. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney VETERANS SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT NETWORK (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Daisy Tate, Executive Director By: Constance Glenn, Development Director NONPROFIT Veterans Supplemental Support Network Daisy Tate 41593 Winchester Road Ste 200 Temecula, CA 92590 dtate@vetsupportnet.org PM Initials: Date: EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA'S SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS PRESENTING CO-SPONSOR Veterans Supplemental Support Network shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers • City of Temecula logo/name on event t -shirt • 5 Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair t -shirts **Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $ 4,000.00 Fire: $ 1,000.00 Public Works: $ 1,000.00 Community Services: $ 830.00 TOTAL: $ 6,830.00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Salute to Heroes Charity Ride & Glow Fair is as follows: Item Value Cable Channel Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds Auto Mall Marque Appears approximately once every 4 ' minutes Promotional Poster Located in the concourse at the City of Temecula Civic Center City Website TOTAL VALUE: $ 5,100.00 $ 3,115.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 11,415.00 Item No. 6 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager ..! CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Sponsorship Agreement with Cyclemania for the Temecula Valley Century PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Recreation Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Cyclemania for city -support costs, in the amount of $8,300, and in-kind promotional services of $11,415, for the Temecula Valley Century. BACKGROUND: Staff has received a sponsorship request from Cyclemania to provide city -support costs for the 2014 Temecula Valley Century to be held on Friday, October 10 and Saturday, October 11, 2014. The Economic Development Sub -Committee of the City Council (Council Members Roberts and Washington) met on March 26, 2014 to review the budget on this special event and recommended support at the levels indicated in the staff report. The event will serve as a fundraiser with Cyclemania, a non-profit organization based in Temecula. Cyclemania's vision is to fight childhood obesity through cycling; provide bicycles for needy children & adults; and establish a scholarship for high school cycling. The Temecula Valley Century will be held October 10-11, 2014 with most activities in Town Square Park, Civic Quad and the Conference Center. The bicycling event will feature rides at various distances in and around Temecula. The event will also include live entertainment, a beer & wine garden featuring local breweries/wineries, health, cycling and local business booths and a bike rodeo & safety inspection for kids. FISCAL IMPACT: The City -support costs of $8,300 and in-kind promotional services of $11,415 are included in the Fiscal Year 2014-15 Operating Budget of the various supporting departments. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND CYCLEMANIA THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 26th day of August 2014, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Cyclemania, a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall operate the Temecula Valley Century (hereinafter referred to as the "Event") on October 10-11, 2014. The Event is a special event which is located in Old Town Temecula. b. The Event includes a benefit concert, bicycle ride of various distances in and around the City of Temecula, bike & health expo and a local beer & wine garden. The goal of the event is to promote the sport of cycling as a way to live a healthy active lifestyle and to provide awareness of our community's commitment to cycling. c. Alcohol will be served. d. The City desires to be a Co -Sponsor of the Event. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 26, 2014, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than October 13, 2014, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing the Nonprofit with in-kind city -support services valued at an amount not to exceed Eight Thousand Three Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($8,300) and in-kind promotional services valued at an amount not to exceed Eleven Thousand Four Hundred Fifteen Dollars and No Cents ($11,415), as listed in Exhibit B, the City of Temecula shall be designated as a Co -Sponsor of the Event. As a Co -Sponsor the City shall receive sponsor benefits as listed in Exhibit A. 4. WRITTEN REPORT Within ninety (90) days after the conclusion of the Event, the Nonprofit shall prepare and submit to the Assistant City Manager a written report evaluating the Event, its attendance, media coverage, and description of the materials in which the City has listed as a Co -Sponsor. The report shall also include samples of media, press clippings, flyers, pamphlets, etc., in a presentation notebook format. In addition, complete financial statements including a balance sheet, income statement and budget to actual comparison report of the Event must be included in such a written report. 5. PERMITS The Nonprofit shall file an application for a Special Event Permit with the City no later than thirty (30) days prior to the first day of the Event. The City retains its governmental jurisdiction to determine whether to issue the permits and the nature and scope of Conditions of Approval. The Nonprofit shall comply with all conditions of approval for the Special Event Permit and/or any other City -issued permits. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval of such permits shall constitute a default of this Agreement and is grounds for termination of this Agreement. 6. MEETING ATTENDANCE The Nonprofit shall attend all City pre -event planning meetings and event recap meetings if warranted. 7. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 8. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by September 9, 2014, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Liquor Liability for bodily injury, personal injury and property damages. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Liquor Liability: One million ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 9. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 10. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 11. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 12. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Recipient: Cyclemania Attn: George Niotta 42225 Remington Ave, A18 Temecula, CA 92590 15. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 14. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CYCLEMANIA (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: George Niotta, President By: Cindy Niotta, Vice President NONPROFIT Cyclemania Attn: George Niotta 42225 Remington Ave, A18 Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 303-5827 George@cyclemania.org PM Initials: ,, Date: EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA'S SPONSORSHIP BENEFITS CO-SPONSOR Cyclemania shall provide the following benefits and services for the citizens of the City of Temecula: • City of Temecula logo/name on advertisements • City of Temecula name on all press releases • City of Temecula logo/name on event poster • City of Temecula logo/name on event flyers • City of Temecula logo/name on event t -shirt • 5 Temecula Valley Century t -shirts if applicable **Press Releases will be distributed to all local media, however, publication cannot be guaranteed. Press Releases can also be provided to all sponsors for distribution to their clients, agents, employees, etc. EXHIBIT "B" IN-KIND SERVICES ESTIMATED VALUE OF CITY SUPPORT SERVICES AND COSTS Based on the input from City departments we received estimated cost projections for the Temecula Valley Century event. The following expenses can be anticipated for the event: Police: $ 4,000.00 Fire: $ 1,000.00 Public Works: $ 1,000.00 Community Services $ 2,300.00 TOTAL: $ 8,300.00 ESTIMATED VALUE OF PROMOTIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA The estimated value for in-kind promotional assistance provided by The City of Temecula for the Temecula Valley Century is as follows: Item Value Cable Channel Event slide appears approximately once per hour for 30 seconds Auto Mall Marque Appears approximately once every 4 1/2 minutes Promotional Poster Located in the concourse at the City of Temecula Civic Center City Website Event listing on the City of Temecula Website TOTAL VALUE $ 5,100.00 $ 3,115.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,200.00 $ 11,415.00 Item No. 7 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Dave Cabral, Battalion Chief DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. for Traumatic Incident Citizen Support PREPARED BY: Becky Obmann, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., in the amount of $10,000, for traumatic incident citizen support. BACKGROUND: The Trauma Intervention Program, better known as TIP is a national non-profit organization that provides counseling and assistance at incidents when Fire and Police call upon them. Services include assistance to family members at an unexplained death, assault, vehicle accident or any incident that the responding public safety officer deems necessary. This program provides a needed service that will provide support to our Temecula residents in a time of need. TIP volunteers undergo a screening process prior to becoming accepted into the program. Prerequisites include passing a Department of Justice background check and a clean driving record. Under the new standards, TIP volunteers must be able to commit to three 12 hour shifts per month and cannot begin work until they attend a 55 -hour training program that includes a one-on-one interview with the board, orientation, intense emotional training and a policies and procedures course. A number of municipalites and organizations throughout Riverside County utilize the Trauma Intervention Program, including the City of Murrieta, Canyon Lake, Lake Elsinore, Menifee and Wildomar. TIP volunteers also provide support in the unincorporated areas of Riverside County. Police and Fire utilize TIP at incidents when life altering events take place. Because both entities use TIP's services the Police and Fire Department will split fund this program providing $5,000 each from their Fiscal Year 2014-15 operating budget. FISCAL IMPACT: Total expenditure not to exceed $10,000. Adequate funds are available in the Fiscal year 2014-15 Police and Fire Department budget. ATTACHMENTS: Sponsorship Agreement SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND TRAUMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM OF SOUTHWEST RIVERSIDE COUNTY, INC. THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of this 26th day of August, 2014, by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc., a California nonprofit corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Nonprofit"). In consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and undertakings set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS This Agreement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes which each of the parties acknowledge and agree are true and correct: a. The Nonprofit shall be available to respond to emergencies upon being contacted by the Fire Department, Police Department or City Authority. Availabilty shall be 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Nonprofit will assist the citizens of Temecula at incidents deemed necessary by the City which may include, but not limited to: a natural or unexplained death; victims of violent crimes including rape, assault, robbery or burglary; victims displaced by fire; disoriented or lonely elderly persons; people involved in vehicle accidents; survivors of suicide and those that are distraught and seeking immediate support. 2. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 26, 2014, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2015, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. CONSIDERATION a. In exchange for providing support services in Fiscal Year 2014-15 the City agrees to pay the the Nonprofit Ten Thousand Dollars and No Cents on or before September 30, 2014. 4. INDEMNIFICATION The Nonprofit shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and representatives from any and all suits, claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, actions, liability or damages of whatsoever kind and nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of the Nonprofit's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement. 5. INSURANCE The Nonprofit shall secure and maintain from a State of California admitted insurance company, pay for and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement an insurance policy of comprehensive general liability against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by August 26, 2014, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Recipient owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Recipient has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Nonprofit shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance is required only if Nonprofit employs any employees. Nonprofit warrants and represents to the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency that it has no employees and that it will obtain the required Worker's Compensation Insurance upon the hiring of any employees. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the NonProfit; products and completed operations of the Recipient; premises owned, occupied or used by the Nonprofit; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Nonprofit. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Nonprofit's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Nonprofit's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Nonprofit shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Nonproft shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Nonprofit's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 6. GOVERNING LAW The City and the Nonprofit understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 7. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Nonprofit shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Nonprofit to comply with this section. 8. ASSIGNMENT The Nonprofit shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. 9. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Use this Address for a Delivery Service: City of Temecula or Hand -Deliveries ONLY Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Recipient: Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. Attn: Gina Magee 32400 Beechwood Lane Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. The Nonprofit shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit shall at all times be under the Nonprofit's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Recipient or any of the Nonprofit's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. The Nonprofit shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. The Nonprofit shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to the Nonprofit in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to the Nonprofit as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to the Nonprofit for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to the Nonprofit for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 12. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Nonprofit and has the authority to bind the Nonprofit to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Tom Tisdale, Chairman of the Board of Directors By: Kim Joseph -Cousins, Treasurer, Board of Directors NONPROFIT Trauma Intervention Program of Southwest Riverside County, Inc. Pam Myers 32400 Beechwood Lane Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 951-678-4502 Plmyers1420@msn.com Item No. 8 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: First Amendment to Exclusive Negotiating Agreement Between the City of Temecula and Wild Rivers Temecula, LLC Regarding City -Owned Property Located at the Northwest Corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Parkway (909-370-002) PREPARED BY: Luke Watson, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) between the City and Wild Rivers Temecula, LLC, (Wild Rivers) for the potential purchase and sale of the City -owned Diaz Road property (APN: 909-370-002) (Subject Property). BACKGROUND: The Affordable Housing Fund of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency purchased the Subject Property, which consists of approximately 32 acres, located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy Lane (APN 909-370-002), from the City of Temecula in 1994. As part of the dissolution of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency in 2012, ownership of all affordable housing assets were transferred to the City. On May 22, 2014, the City received a Letter of Interest (LOI) from Wild Rivers outlining their interest in potentially purchasing the Subject Property and developing a water park. Wild Rivers introduced their development team which includes Wild Rivers, Kirin Hopkins International, Inc., and HKG Sports. Exclusive Negotiating Agreement On July 8, 2014 the City Council approved the ENA between Wild Rivers and the City. The term of the ENA was from July 8, 2014 to August 8, 2014, with the option of an extension of an additional 30 days. Wild Rivers and the City have continuously negotiated in good faith through the ENA term but both parties would like additional time to negotiate the final terms of the transaction. The City and Wild Rivers would like to establish November 30, 2014 as the new expiration of the ENA with the option of a 45 -day administrative extension if necessary. Ultimately the City and Wild Rivers, under the terms of the ENA, will negotiate a Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) for the disposition of the Subject Property. If terms of a PSA are agreed upon, the PSA would return to the City Council for final approval at a public meeting before any transaction could take place. FISCAL IMPACT: If the sale of the Subject Property is consummated, all proceeds of the sale are required to be deposited in the City's Affordable Housing Fund for future allocation to affordable housing development. ATTACHMENTS: 1. First Amendment to the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement 2. Site Map FIRST AMENDMENT OF EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT This FIRST AMENDMENT OF EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is dated as of August 26, 2014, and is entered into by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation (the "City") and WILD RIVERS TEMECULA, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Purchaser"). RECITALS A. The City and Purchaser entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement dated July 8, 2014 ("ENA") to negotiate on an exclusive basis to establish the terms and conditions of a "purchase and sale agreement" ("PSA") that would result in the sale of land described in the ENA by City to Purchaser with the understanding that the City shall be under no obligation to reach agreement on the terms thereof with Purchaser. B. The Purchaser and the City desire to extend the term of the ENA. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The ENA Period (as such term is used in the ENA) is hereby extended until November 30, 2014. If a PSA has not been signed and approved within the initial Negotiation Period, and the Purchaser and the City are using good faith efforts to negotiate diligently, then such ENA Period may be extended further in writing by the City Manager for forty-five (45) days to enable the Purchaser and the City to (1) determine whether each desires to enter into a PSA, (2) hold any public hearings required by laws and take the action necessary to authorize the City to approve the PSA and (3) sign the PSA. 2. This Amendment constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof There are no other agreements or understandings between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof or any related subject and no representations by either Party to the other have been made as an inducement to enter into this Amendment. All prior negotiations between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof are superseded by this Amendment. 3. This Amendment may not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing executed by all Parties. 4. If any Party should bring any legal action or proceeding relating to this Amendment or to enforce any provision hereof, or if the Parties agree to arbitration or mediation relating to this Amendment, the Party in whose favor a judgment or decision is rendered shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses from the other. The Parties agree that any legal action or proceeding or agreed-upon arbitration or mediation shall be filed in and shall occur in the County of Riverside. 5. The interpretation and enforcement of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 11086-0001 \1741047v1.doc 6. Time is of the essence of each and every provision hereof. 7. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above. PURCHASER: WILD RIVERS TEMECULA, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Surf Hill, LLC By: Mike Riedel President CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Maryann Edwards Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney -2- 11086-0001 \ 1741047v 1. doc ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DESCRIPTION OF SITE Real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4646, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 6 PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 (SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE ALSO BEING THE CENTERLINE OF A RIVER CHANNEL EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE), SOUTH 41°42'2T' EAST 19.08 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 4000.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6°36'30", A DISTANCE OF 461.35 FEET; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE SOUTH 48°18'52" EAST 482.01 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY SOUTH 43°58'46" WEST 1,387.89 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 850.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°52'4T' A DISTANCE OF 383.91 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41°50'22" WEST 1,001.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 48°09'30" EAST 1,680.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. -3- 11086-0001 \1741047v1.doc NUMBER OF PARCELS = 3 NUMBER OF LETTERED LOTS = 3 GROSS AREA = 40.001 AC. NET AREA = 34.332 AC. PROJECT LOCATION 0 f 2196047.3 98 ` 6317223.991 JOINED PIPES W/STD. SURVEY SCREW IN TOP f 1 et— N71 22 18 E��I�` nGNnY PKWY :556.61 (356.576GRID El 2 AVENIDA DE VENTAS WINCH STER RD. WINCHESTCR RD. VICINITY & HORIZONTAL SURVEY CONTROL MAP NOT TO SCALE ILL (2154994.777 \ 6313564.389 j JOINED PIPES W/STD. SURVEY SCREW IN TOP SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS OFFICIAL MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND IS BASED UPON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCES AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY ENGINEER IN MAY 2012, THAT IT COMPLIES WITH SECTION 66499.52 AND DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, OFFICIAL MAPS PROVISION OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, AND THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. iii DATED: !/.� h n;� 13. WILLIAM L. GREEN, L.S. 4547 EXPIRES: 9-30-14 CITY ENG IWEIR 'S STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND HAS BEEN EXAMINED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT IT COMPLIES WITH DIVISION 3, OFFICIAL MAPS, OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,THAT ALL PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND THAT I AM SATISIFIED THIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATED: 3 - Z (" , 2013. r KRIS R. WINCHAK, LS 6240 EXP. 3/31/14 FOR GREG BUTLER, CITY ENGINEER (AS DELEGATED) CITY OF TEMECULA SIGNATURE OMISSIONS NOTE: SEE SHEET NO. 2 FOR SIGNATURE OMISSIONS NOTE. H: \PDATA\15102484\CADD\MAPPING\OFFICIAL MAP\24840M001.OWG TYERLOOP 3/11/13 10:29 am IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICIAL V AP E3ING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 4646 ON FILE IN E OK 6, PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ■ ■ ■ CONSULTING MAY, 2012 RESOLUTION NO. 13-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING AN OFFICIAL MAP AND SUBDIVIDING A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 4646 ON FILE IN BOOK 6, PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. FINDINGS. THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY FIND DETERMINE AND DECLARE THAT: A. DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE AUTHORIZES THE CITY COUNCIL TO DIRECT THE CITY ENGINEER TO CAUSE TO HAVE AN OFFICIAL MAP PREPARED OF PORTIONS OF THE CITY; B. THE CITY ENGINEER HAS BEEN DIRECTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO HAVE AN OFFICIAL MAP PREPARED PURSUANT TO SAID DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE; C. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, A FIELD SURVEY WAS DONE AND AN OFFICIAL MAP PREPARED BY WILLIAM L. GREEN, A LICENSED SURVEYOR, NUMBER L.S. 4547; D. THE CITY OF TEMECULA OWNS A PORTION OF LAND IN FEE IN PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 4646 ON FILE IN BOOK 6, PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; E. SAID OFFICIAL MAP SUBDIVIDES ONE PARCEL OF LAND INTO THREE (3) PARCELS OF LAND OWNED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN FEE; SECTION 2. APPROVAL OF OFFICIAL MAP. THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY APPROVES, ADOPTS AND CERTIFIES THE MAP CONSISTING OF THREE (3) SHEETS ATTACHED HERETO AS THE OFFICIAL MAP IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF DIVISION 3 OF TITLE 7 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES THEREIN NAMED. SECTION 3. DEDICATION TO PUBLIC. THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY DEDICATES TO THE PUBLIC FOR STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, LOT A (DIAZ ROAD), LOT B (CHERRY STREET) AND LOT C (DENDY PARKWAY) AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP THAT IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS AN OFFICIAL MAP. ALSO AS A CONDITION OF DEDICATION OF LOTS "A", "B" AND "C" THE OWNERS OF PARCELS 1 AND 2 WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERAL EASEMENTS OF TRAVEL, ALSO EXCEPTING THE ACCESS OPENINGS AS SHOWN ON THE OFFICIAL MAP. ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WIDTH THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS CONDITION OF ACCESS RIGHTS AS TO THE PART VACATED. SECTION 4. CERTIFICATION. THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO CERTIFY TO THE ADOPTION OF THIS RESOLUTION ATTESTED BY THE OFFICIAL SEAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013. ATTEST: [SEAL] c�. MICHAEL S. NAGGAR, M OR SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THISntld DAY OF C1961 , 2013. AT c4. IN BOOK 1 OF OFFICIAL MAPS, AT PAGE i3 -a5 , AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK TY OF TEMECULA No e2Ot -p 156:511/ FEES LARRY W. WARD, COUNTY ASSESSOR - CLERK -RECORDER BY: 411. , DEPUTY TUU truer S II0N GUARANTEE 8Y— f FIRST AMERICAN TITLE C0MPANY STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, SUSAN W. JONES, MMC, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION NO. 13-15 WAS DULY AND REGULARLY ADOPTED AND IS SIGNED BY A MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE MAYOR AS PRESIDING OFFICER OF SAID BODY AT A MEETING THEREOF HELD ON THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Q COUNCIL MEMBERS: C0MERCHERO, EDWARDS, ROBERTS, WASHINGTON, NAGGAR NOES: Q. ABSENT: Q ABSTAIN: Q COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NONE NONE NONE 40 -- SUSAN W. JO 6I,,CLERK 0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTAINT SHEET AFFECTING THIS MAP IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF TEMECULA, IN E.C.S. BOOK T, PAGES 379. THIS AFFECTS ALL LOTS. EASEMENT NOTES AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR RIVER CHANNEL BANK PROTECTIONS WORK AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, REC. 9/13/39 IN BK 434, PG 108, O.R. THE EFFECT OF A DECLARATION OF DEDICATION, PURPORTING TO IRREVOCABLE DEDICATE IN PERPETUITY FOR PUBLIC ROAD, PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE PURPOSES, THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED THEREIN, REC. 11/16/72 AS INST. NO. 152905, O.R. THE EFFECT OF A RESOLUTION BY THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACCEPTING SAID OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF VESTING TITLE IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC, BUT NOT AS PART OF THE COUNTY -MAINTAINED ROAD SYSTEM, REC. 9/2/82 AS INST. NO. 153178, O.R. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, REC. 1/9/73 AS INST. NO. 3490, O.R. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF KACOR REALTY INC. FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SLOPES AND ROAD EASEMENTS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, REC. 5/31/73 AS INST. NO. 70688, O.R. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR PIPELINES AND APPURTENANCES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, REC. 11/14/90 AS INST. NO. 415924, O.R. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF RANCON BUSINESS CENTER/RANCHO CALIFORNIA FOR ROADWAY, UTILITY LINES AND CONDUITS, REC. 10/04/89 AS INST. NO. 344254, O.R. AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT FOR SEWER TRANSMISSION AND COLLECTION FACILfIIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, REC. 01/26/2007 AS INST. NO. 2007-0063024, O.R. A CONSERVATION EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT RECORDED FEBRUARY 1, 2013 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2013-0056484, O.R. 2707 88' [[2707.42'1] N 0 O TRACT MAP NO. 35181 M.B. 430/66-72 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICIAL VAP BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 4646 ON FILE IN BOOK 6, PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. in ■ ■ CONSULTING MAY, 2012 SIGNATURE OMISSION NOTE PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR RIVER CHANNEL, BANK PROTECTIONS WORK AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 13, 1939 IN BOOK 434, PAGES 108 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBL IC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED JANUARY 9, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 3490 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. KACOR REALTY INC. HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, DRAINAGE, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SLOPES AND ROAD EASEMENTS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED MAY 31, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 70688, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, HOLDER OF EASEMENTS FOR PIPELINES AND APPURTENANCES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1990 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 415924 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS AND FOR SEWER TRANSMISSION AND COLLECTION FACILT1ES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JANUARY 26, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0063024 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. RANCON BUSINESS CENTER, HOLDER OF AN EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY, UTILITY LINES AND CONDUITS, RECORDED OCTOBER 4, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 344254 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PROCEDURES OF SURVEY PARCEL MAP NO. 24991 P.M.B. 165/96-103 PCL. 6 MURRIETA CITY LIMITS �---- C/L CHERRY STREET o. h�O N48°09'33"E 5747.99' [5747.69' CALC. ] <N 48°09'38"E 5748.30' CALC.> N48°09'33"E 1680.60' ((1680.60')) r N •g CD 'o c• 3m r- = 0 0 o 9 ao Z M u 1,• z / PARCEL 1 LOT B --ESTABLISHED AS SW'Y LINE OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN A DEED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECORDED 4-23-92 AS INST. NO. 146241,O.R. BY HOLDING RECORD CURVE DATA ON DENDY PARKWAY AND RECORD DISTANCE ALONG NWLY LINE OF PROPERTY. [[N48°08'43"E L. 5747.78']] TEMECULA CITY LIMITS PARCEL 2 SEE DETAIL "A" HEREON N20°07'36"W (R) z�- -- -- -- 1387..) N43°59142"E _1387.82';(N4359 1387.89')) ((N43°58'46��E C/L DENDY PARKWAY PARCEL HB" I LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT N0. PA 99-0351 \ NO. 557083, O.R. INST. 0 n REC. 12-27-99 13ooaa PCL. PARCEL MAP NO. � p. M. B. 200/9-,10 H: \PDATA\15102484\CADD\MAPPING\OFFICIAL MAP\24840M002.DWG TVERLOOP 3/11/13 10:37 am \� ti , x11 .4 C/L ADAMS AVENUE 1359.51 00') <1360.001> [1359.75'] DATA TABLE so BEARING/DELTA RADIUS LENGTH (R) 1 N48°18'41"W (N48°18'54"W <N48°18'52"W 2 04°25'58" 3 N37°15'21"E (N37°15108"E 4 N41°41'19"E 5 (02°18'23" 6 (27°22'36" 7 N71°22'18"E (N71°22'05"E [[N71°21'44"E 8 ((25°52'42" 9 N37°15'21"E 10 N46°01112"W 11 06°43'27" (06°43'27" 12 01°29'54" [[01°29'54" 13 N46°01'12"W (N46°01'25"W 14 N48°18'41"W (N48°18'54"W <N48°18'52"W 4000.00' (R) (R) 2000.00' 850.00' 850.00' (R) 4280.00' 4280.00' 850.00' 850.00' N43° 59 42" E ---95403 1250.50' 1250.50') 1249.15'> 309.47' 144.82' 144.82') 100.89' 80.51')& MEAS 406.14')& MEAS 356.61' 356.61') 356.62']] 383.91'))& MEAS 280.00' 613.10' 502.31' 502.30') 22.23' 22.23']] 607.42' 607.49') 767.91' 767.97') 767.14'> � igY SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS MONUMENT NOTES_ SET 1" IP & TAG "LS 4547" IN GROUND OR LEAD AND TAG "LS 4547" IN CONCRETE OR SPIKE & WASHER STAMPED "LS 4547" IN ASPHALT HAVING A THICKNESS OF 2" OR MORE AT ALL PARCEL CORNERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 0 INDICATES SEARCHED, FOUND NOTHING, SET 1" IP & TAG "LS 4547" IN GROUND OR LEAD AND TAG "LS 4547" IN CONCRETE OR SPIKE & WASHER STAMPED "LS 4547" IN ASPHALT HAVING A THICKNESS OF 2" OR MORE. ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN AS SET SHALL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 461.9 AND THE MONUMENTATION AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAP. • INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED AND REFERENCED HEREON. 01 FD 1" IP W/TAG "LS 7161" PER PM NO. 28657-1, PMB 193/64-67, FLUSH [O FD 1" IP, NO TAG, NO REF, DN 0.7'. NOT ACCEPTED AS CORNER. FD 1-1/4" IP, NO TAG, UP 0.4'; ACCEPTED AS POINT ON CENTERLINE OF CHERRY STREET PER PM NO. 24991, PMB 165/96-103; SET "LS 4547" TAG IN PIPE FD 2" IP W/TAG "RCE 26283",IN LIEU OF 1" IP W/TAG "RCE 26283" PER PM NO. 29895, PMB 198/15-16, FLUSH; ACC AS C/L EC. FD 2" IP W/TAG "RCE 26283", IN LIEU OF 1" IP W/TAG "RCE 26283" PER PM NO. 29895, PMB 198/15-16, FLUSH; ACC AS C/L BC. FD "C" NAIL, NO REF; ACCEPTED AS C/L EC PER PM 193/64-67, FLUSH. SET 1" IP W/TAG "LS 4547". FD 1" IP W/TAG "RCE 26406" PER PM NO. 24085-3, FD WELL MON W/BRASS CAP "RCE 26406" PER PM NO. DN 1.0' 5.68' C/L REMINGTON AVENUE DETAIL "A" NOT TO SCALE SEARCHED FOUND. NOTHING SET NOTHING NO. 28657-1, PMB PMB 190/95-97, FLUSH. 24085-3, PMB 190/95-97, SURVEYOR'S NOTES 1. THIS OFFICIAL MAP CONTAINS 40.008 ACRES, GROSS. 2. THIS OFFICIAL MAP CONTAINS 3 NUMBERED PARCELS AND 3 LETTERED LOTS. 3. ( ) INDICATES RECORD DATA 28657-1, PMB 193/64-67 4. < > INDICATES RECORD DATA PMB 6/75. 5. [ ] INDICATES RECORD DATA PMB 165/96-103. INDICATES RECORD DATA CITY OF TEMECULA RECOR INSTRUMENT NO. 146241 7. [[ ]] INDICATES RECORD DATA M.B. 430/66-72. PER PARCEL MAP NO. , UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PER PARCEL MAP NO. 4646, PER PARCEL MAP NO. 24991, PER GRANT DEED TO THE DED APRIL 23, 1992 AS ,O.R. PER TRACT MAP NO. 35181, INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS. BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTE THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY. IS THE CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM, ZONE VI, NA083 (EPOCH 2007.0) AS DETERMINED LOCALLY BY A LINE BETWEEN CONTINUOUS OPERATING REFERENCE STATIONS (CORS) BILL AND DVLS BEING NORTH 05°05'38.83" EAST AS DERIVED FROM GEODETIC VALUES PUBLISHED BY THE CALIFORNIA SPATIAL REFERENCE CENTER (CSRC) AND/OR NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS), RESPECTIVELY. ALL DISTANCES SHOWN ARE GROUND DISTANCES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GRID DISTANCES MAY BE OBTAINED BY MULTIPLYING GROUND DISTANCES BY 0.99991389. 100 50 0 100 200 300 50.00 430/66-72 SCALE: 1"=100' IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICIAL V AP BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP NO. 4646 ON FILE IN E300K 6, PAGE 75 OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL MAP NO. 24991 P.M.B. 165/96-103 Pa. 6 C/L CHERRY STREET N48'09'33"E 1680.60' h oo / N17'00'22"E C/L 42' ACCESS OPENING C/L 26' ACCESS OPENING • •00" / LOT B PARCEL 1 19.273 ACRES 1400.60' 859.08' N48'09'33"E 1377.78' C/L 26' ACCESS OPENING 11111111 rn ■ • ■ CONSULTING MAY, 2012 1 -Fl f 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 115118 11 1 1- C/L 26' ACCESS OPENING PARCEL 2 10.910 ACRES _R III o) 0 N29'09'51"E (R) -11 50. SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING SET .00 N47633'17°E (R) C/L 60' ACCESS OPENING 399.65' 7 8 I. 1 I 2 -o --I 1 00 ao.- •- rr r JJ 88 8 0.11 rie e aNN a co -co tN Il) If) -r m •- r r 0 SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING SET 31 11 31 31 180.00 39' tab- 0 150' r -J II II % II II 11 II II • 11 20' 11 INS 00 a r • 80 4.1w w 37S r0 •- O 1 ZZ Z 120 15' I 1 r_ - \50' 1--- \ ) 1 11 I I I 1 {I 11 It 11 I I I I PARCEL 3 4.150 ACRES • M 1 7 1 Mt_ -�+4 0 20' N43 5942"E 645.03' ----------- 0 - 0 • 0 .49' 11 II II II II 11 IN 11 II II 11 11 II II II ti 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 II II II II. 11 11 11 II 150' SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING SET co i L381.35 1 2 *--sae‹.it 1 ---s.�� 4 5 IW/ n r oN T PCL. 1 PCL . 2� 7 PARCEL MAP 30044 P.M.B. 200%9-10 � 91 C/L DENY PARKWAY N43'59'42"E 1387.82' 6 PARCEL "D" 1 ADJUSTMENT NO. PA 99'035 LOT LINE INST. NO . 1999-557083 O.R. SEE DETAIL "B" H ON II i II 11 11 II II II 11 11 11 15' Q O 12' SHEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS DATA TABLE ® 1BEARING/DELTA I RADIUS I LENGTH 1 N41'42'20'W 19.16' 2 N41'42'20"W 18.73' 3 N41'42'20"W 18.62' (N41'42'33"W 19.75') <N41'42'22"W 18.55'> 4 N85'54'48"W -- 33.07' 5 N41'41'19"E -- 100.89' 6 02'18'23" 2000.00' 80.51' 7 N46.01'12"W -- 5.68' 8 NO2'32'44"W -- 31.65' 9 N41'41'19"E -- 17.05' 10 02'18'23" 1950.00' 78.50' 11 01'29'54" .850.00' 22.23' 12 00'44'23" 4280.00' 55.26' 13 N41'42'20"W - 18.50' 14 N43'59'42"E - 114.00' 15 N46'01'12"W - 75.24' 16 N46'01'12"W -- 613.10' 17 13'08'02" 188.00' 43.10' 18 N32'53'10"W -- 15.56' 19 13'08'02" 212.00' 48.60' 20 N43'591422E -- 159.00' 21 20'43'35" 50.00' 18.09' 22 N64'43'17"E -- 15.62' 23 20'43'35" 50.00' 18.09' 24 N43'59'42"E -- 50.00' 25 20'43'35" 50.00' 18.09' 26 N23'16'07"E -- 15.62' 27 20'43'35" 50.00' 18.09' 28 02'04'37" 800.00' 29.00' 29 02226106" 800.00' 34.00' 30 N48'09'332E -- 230.00' (N48'09'37"E -- 230.00') <N48'09'38"E -- 230.00'> 31 N43'59'42"E -- 252.50' <N43'58'46"E -- 252.501> 32 168'27'26" 52.38' 154.00' N43'58'48"E _64.00i - :.e. 64_00' _,.. - i .r - SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND, NOTHING SET i DETAIL "B" NOT TO SCALE SEE SHEET 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S NOTES, MONUMENT NOTES, EASEMENT NOTES AND BASIS OF BEARINGS NOTE. H: \PDATA\15102484\CADD\MAPPING\OFFICIAL MAP\24840M003.DWG TVERLOOP 3/11/13 10:38 am Item No. 9 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager ..IA CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to the Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., in the amount of $50,000, for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services, for a total agreement amount of $102,000. BACKGROUND: On November 12, 2013 the City entered into an Agreement with Keyser Marston Associates (KMA) for $20,000 for services related to fiscal and economic impact analysis; market support and valuation; transaction structuring and negotiation; and financial analysis. On June 10, 2014, City Council approved the first amendment for $32,000 to the Agreement to prepare a developer incentives program to incorporate into the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. This second amendment to the agreement for $50,000 is for additional work related to the developer incentives analysis for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan as well as other real estate economic consulting services on an as needed basis, not to exceed $102,000. FISCAL IMPACT: There is sufficient funding in account 165.199.999.5250 (Other Outside Services) to cover the cost of the Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. REAL ESTATE ECONOMIC CONSULTING SERVICES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 26, 2014 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On November 12, 2013 the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services," in the amount of $20,000. b. On June 10, 2014, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services," to add scope of work, extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2015, and to increase the payment in the amount of $32,000. c. The parties now desire to add scope of work, increase the payment in the amount of $50,000 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), for additional economic real estate consulting for a total Agreement amount of one hundred two thousand dollars ($102,000). 3. Exhibits A and B to the Agreement are hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor Paul C. Marra, Managing Principal ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Attn: Paul Marra 555 West Beech Street Suite 460 San Diego, CA 92101 619.718.9500 pmarra@keysermarston.com 2 Acting PM Initials: Date: ATTACHMENT A Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Consultant. 3 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SAN FRANCISCO A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY KATE EARLE FUNK DEBBIE M. KERN REED T. KAWAIIARA DAVID DOEZEMA LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RAM GREGORY D. Soo -Hoo KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. RoMEY SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA >air KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES. ADVISORS IN PUBLIC/PRIVATE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Luke Watson, Senior Planner City of Temecula From: Date: Subject: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. June 17, 2014 Proposal for Real Estate Economic Consulting Services for 2014-2015 Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) is pleased to submit this proposal for economic consulting services to assist the City of Temecula with its economic development and redevelopment objectives. KMA proposes to provide the following economic consulting services on an as -needed basis: • Market Support and Valuation - KMA will assist the City with market demand analyses; identification of appropriate development programs; and projection of absorption potential and achievable rents and prices. KMA will also work with community stakeholders and planning and design professionals to evaluate the development potential — both commercial and residential — for specific districts or neighborhoods. • Fiscal and Economic Impact - KMA will prepare assessments of fiscal and economic benefits for proposed developments, including in -fill residential and commercial uses. These assessments consider the potential impacts of a development proposal on the surrounding community; the level of property tax and sales tax generation; and potential benefits in terms of jobs/housing balance. • Financial Analysis - KMA will assist the City in reviewing the financial feasibility of proposed developments. This task will serve the City in several ways: comparison of competing proposals; identification of supportable land value, or, alternatively, need for "gap" financing; and assessment of the overall feasibility of alternative development concepts. Typically, the KMA pro forma analyses are used extensively in the context of negotiations with developers and/or property owners. 4 • Developer Incentives Analysis — KMA will prepare financial feasibility analyses related to a potential public benefits/development incentives program under review for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. Potential development incentives may include density bonuses, parking reductions, and other measures. The KMA analyses will assess the value enhancement created by each development incentive as measured for a series of commercial, residential, and mixed-use development prototypes. • Transaction Structuring/Negotiations - One of KMA's key roles is to assist public agencies in soliciting and evaluating development proposals from qualified developers and property owners. KMA will assist the City in negotiating the terms of land sales and public financial assistance. • Public Hearings and Presentations — KMA will participate as needed in public meetings when economic development and redevelopment transactions are considered. KMA will provide all services, as requested, on a time -and -materials basis subject to the attached standard hourly billing rate schedule. 5 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. HOURLY FEE SCHEDULE 2014/2015 A. JERRY KEYSER* $280.00 MANAGING PRINCIPALS. $280.00 SENIOR PRINCIPALS* $270.00 PRINCIPALS* $250.00 MANAGERS* $225.00 SENIOR ASSOCIATES $187.50 ASSOCIATES $167.50 SENIOR ANALYSTS $150.00 ANALYSTS $130.00 TECHNICAL STAFF $95.00 ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF $80.00 Directly related job expenses not included in the above rates are: auto mileage, parking, air fares, hotels and motels, meals, car rentals, taxies, telephone calls, delivery, electronic data processing, graphics and printing. Directly related job expenses will be billed at 110% of cost. Monthly billings for staff time and expenses incurred during the period will be payable within thirty (30) days of invoice date. * Rates for individuals in these categories will be increased by 50% for time spent in court testimony. 6 Item No. 10 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Agreement with CWE for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Community Park), PW11-10 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Engineer David McBride, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with CWE, in the amount of $47,715, for the design of Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10, adjacent to the Pala Community Park. BACKGROUND: On February 11, 2014, City Council approved an agreement to investigate solutions to erosion at three park sites (Pala Community Park, Margarita Community Park, and Butterfield Stage Park). Since that time a detailed investigation and report of the parks erosion from the adjacent flood control channel was completed. Staff has reviewed the report including the recommended methods for protecting each location and the corresponding cost estimate. Based on the available funds, staff decided to focus solely on improvement of Pala Community Park with riprap and groin system (spur system) as the preferred alternative. Due to their excellent work and substantial experience gained on the investigation, staff requested a proposal from CWE to provide full working drawings for preferred spur system at Pala Community Park and a credit proposal to abandon further investigative work at the two other park sites. CWE provided a cost of $78,195 for full working drawings and technical specifications for Pala Community Park, and a credit of $30,480 for work under the original agreement that will not be undertaken for a net increase of $47,715. Staff has thoroughly reviewed the proposal, the respective costs and credits and found them to be reasonable. Upon approval, the resulting agreement base amount will be $142,531, with an authorized contingency of $9,480. FISCAL IMPACT: The Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair is identified within the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2015-19, and is funded with Capital Project Reserve Funds. Sufficient funding for the recommended action is available within Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Account No. 210.165.127. ATTACHMENTS: 1. First Amendment 2. Project Locations 3. Project Description FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND CWE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR (PALA PARK), PW11-10 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 26, 2014, by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and CWE, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On February 11, 2014, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services," in the amount of $94,816. b. The parties now desire to add scope of work, increase the payment in the amount of $47,715, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 5 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed Forty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($47,715) for a net increase to the original scope of work involving full working drawings and technical specifications for improvement of Pala Community Park, for a total Agreement amount of One Hundred Forty Two Thousand Five Hundred Thirty One Dollars ($142,531). 3. Exhibit "A" and "B" to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA CWE By: By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor Vik Bapna, Chief Executive Officer ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Jason Pereira, Secretary By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT CWE Jason Pereira 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton, CA 92831-5202 (714) 526-7500 (714) 526-7004 jpereira@cwecorp.com] 2 Acting PM Initials Date: ATTACHMENT A Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the additional scope of work and associated cost as provided by the Consultant. 3 AAT "A" C3ly of Tamara. Med [seed Charleroi Pecwrstrucaon and Repan Project Ma. PW11-10 Proposal Proves somal Service Fee Rename try ONE on 01/10/2014 Teak Tete Project Manager 1140 Wer2C 01 P 5110 Prelude Englneer 5130 5.401 6eJeer 6140 00001 Engineer 1108 Assistant Engineer 561 Leerded Surveyor 5124 0181E CfE R and Field 0nvertdpa lNB I-1 I 53,10400 4 4 4 B Reearth I3,4 1.4 , foldid Envesbgal,n Pala CommrrtyPak 53.1114 03 4 4 0500.00 Ss 507.00 6 FeIn6 ld vesbgatmn lP Pak 53,8!6.0' 4 4 5500.000 10.00 Long Can,..0 Canyon Sneak Pak 1.5 Fuld leves010 11,944.30 4 8 6500,001 50.30 1..5 20 L eC Prepare P1plo Lnged Feld IrwesOgaLm Serena, 514000 4 ekaeelna GeriOtle s Mydra0YC and Sena Malden 2.1 Temecula Creek 52220.03 4 - 13 2.2 Em7ae Cree3 52,708 CO 4 12 23 :Long Canyon Creek 51,90400 4 2 12 3.0 0erele0meed etCeecan# Iiiterierthme 3,1 Pala Community Palk Allan. s 51,932.00 2 2 12 3.2 'Mayan.cgln4ae1y Pak Alba 15110 52,422.00 2 2 12 3.3 lag Gn6o, Creek Pak A0enutM0 51600,03 2 _ ; 12 3.4 3.5 Peet Con e0f 0eprt Marvandm Cite Review and S.; x.^ of Petered Al ,13*ls 64,346.0 t6 2 2 4 4 4 40 4.1 4.2 Peapscd Caen Iitemille rd Sgeaa.klpr Temecula Cloak 4004e C,ree6 52,002.50 so 20 d 0 2 0 ; 4.3 1010 Carryon Caroni 8030 0 0 0 3,0 0erelsp Schematic 0.5sn Crwlsge 5.1 Paul Co mgnts Pak Aler„atwm 54,00.00 4 2 0 16 51,,300.00 5.2 _Maganla. Cum1Wnsy Pak Allm,alves 91,620.110 2 2 8 50.00 5.3 Lug Canyon Creel: Part AlVernatees 11,28400 2 2 0 a 1062 0A 0eueir enc Y1oa11rauon Rencienees 6.1 Pau Community Park Marnattees 6 2 Madgarra Cmun,niy 73-$ Alternate/ft 53.262 03 4 1 62,5500 5030 5000 0 0 0 0 00.00 6.3 L,,: gGn,rts,, Creek Park Alten,al S 7.0 Pr+Rminey Cost dercetlea Pala mmmun0y Park Albmna15515 51,330.00 2 4 8 1.1 7 2 Margarita Cmanur y Pae 3Pt301,3, es 51,650.00 2 1 8 7.3 Lang Canyon Conk Pan, akemx1w0 51,114.00 2 1 8 aA Project Manasasen6 and 50 8.1 Prpl,g45a0e,nn $3,046.00 16 4 1.2 a:3 Meetings waft Oft 121 T.krmrdence5 (41 51 154-00 51,104.00 0 0 0,0 1 151t_par9_Pnp.o o. 9.1 Prepare Omen Rt*3e't 46,80060 6 4 8 16 FI 8 9.2 City Rey. 9.3 Renege to Draft Design Peygl 53,55230 a 2 4 A 4 4 100 Om,Fe menti G5wk0Wo,atdd Review 10.1 Pau Cnannrly Pak Aylana536S 52,7213.30 0 4 _ 6 102 Hamann Caaes4y Pak ARmapaes 50.30 0 0 103 Teen Canyon Creek Park ASaeuWPs 50.30 0 0 0 Total Pee and Maas _ ;64,336.00 336 10 40 06 66 1 M 0 53,000.00 ;1,,500.00 1001303 11 Taft n0llugraptnc Survey 511.120.90 tit©c)t�--tetD r 1 Pre rnr t aF K6 -2,K 4 C= Mgldkd eased rn Cares Requeo 400)0ed basee on Cat's Penns[ Merh0ep 000101 City's Rayuesl Is 3 61 was already dale for Me PQE Kw. was aSeady bone for the PrP e Wok was already term for Dee PCR IS work was akealy dere ke the MI Is work was already dere tor Uro PCR work was already ,'bre For O,e PCR Is en. was *earn done Be the PO! Modered Weed on Cat's Request 210 bae2ce 011'5Rq,00 bed bard m City s Rmq,es, %aero nasal 05091,"on Elden ceded eu Co, Reed .t hep peep m C.dys Realest n work was already dorm to the PER e 001, was already done for 01e POE 15 wok was already done for the PCA Pled 60130 on Cry% Meer. Wm pa9a1 On GOO Request A1TAGNM.L T' `tA" CW111101 July 25, 2014 EMAIL Mr. David McBride Senior Engineer — City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Civil Engineering Design Proposal Pala Park Channel Restoration - Spur System Design PR# 14268 Dear Mr. McBride, CWE 1561 E. ORANGETHORPE AVENUE SUITE 240 FULLERTON. CA 92831-5202 (714) 526-7500 PHONE (714) 526-7004 FAX www.cwecorp.com CWE is pleased to submit this cost proposal for civil engineering analysis and design services to develop a channel bank restoration plan utilizing a system of riprap spurs for the channel bank along Pala Park. It is our understanding that the objectives of the project are to design a spur system as discussed in the Project Concept Report by CWE, and provide the plans, specifications, and engineering cost estimate for the system. The permit applications for the project will also be made under this scope of work. The tasks related to this analysis include a site investigation to determine existing utility locations, a topographic survey for development of design drawings, geotechnical analysis including borings along the bank, development of the 75%, 90% and Final design plans, development of 90% and final specifications and cost estimates, and preparation of permit applications for the project. Based on the above tasks, we have developed our scope of services and cost estimate. Scope of Work Task 1— Meetings and Project Management CWE will coordinate pre -design activities with City project manager (i.e. meeting schedule, topics of discussion, required attending personnel, site visit, etc.). It is anticipated that one (1) in-person, and five teleconference meetings will be held. The one meeting will be for the kick-off, with the teleconferences covering the 75% design plan review, 90% design plan review, final plans, and other coordination planning meetings. CWE will prepare agendas and meeting minutes. CWE will prepare Monthly Progress Reports with information on actual vs. planned work progress along with an updated project schedule. The reports will be sent with the monthly project invoice. Deliverables include: Project schedule and updates, Meeting Agendas and Minutes, Monthly Progress Reports, and project invoices. "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 5 A W/rCt+M"A 11 Mr. David McBride July 25, 2014 Page 2 Task 2 — Detailed Site Analysis In preparation to develop the 75% design plans for the proposed bank protection system, a more detailed site analysis is required. The design plans for the upstream housing tract and park will be reviewed for utility locations, as well as flood control features. Once key features are identified, a topographic survey for design plan development will be conducted, as well as a detailed geotechnical investigation of the banks. Once the survey is completed, a field verification of key features and structures will be conducted. Task 2.1— Data Review and Field Survey Design drawings of Pala Park, and the upstream housing tract will be provided by the City for review by CWE. Once key features have been noted, a topographic survey will be conducted to provide information for the area within the project limits including the parcel owned by the upstream homeowners association. This data will include 50 scale aerial topography (1' contour interval), and supplemental field survey. This information will be presented in the State Plane NAD83 California Zone VI geo-referenced coordinate system and will be merged with the 2006 aerial survey data collected by the City for areas outside the construction zone. This will be done to minimize survey costs. Task 2.2 — Geotechnical Investigation The development of the Pala Park project alternatives included a preliminary geotechnical investigation that performed a review of preliminary plans and design concepts for the project, evaluated the readily available background materials, reviewed seismic data regarding geologic and seismic hazards within the project area and performed an initial site reconnaissance to document the surficial geologic conditions. A detailed geotechnical evaluation during the preliminary design phase of the project will require obtaining appropriate permits for exploration. Once permits are obtained, subsurface explorations will be conducted at six locations along the bank and channel bed, and the soil samples will be sent to a geotechnical laboratory for testing. The data will be compiled and analyzed and presented with recommendations in a preliminary Geotechnical Report. Task 2.3 — Utility Research and Mapping CWE will verify locations and depths of utilities by requesting utility agencies record drawings through Underground Service Alert (USA). Park design drawings made available by the City will be utilized to locate water and irrigation lines in the construction area. Survey records and parcel information from the City will be incorporated in the design. CWE will pothole up to three (3) spots to locate utilities that may be of concern to the project design and will be logged and maintained for design reference. Potholes will be backfilled and compacted with the materials removed from the pothole location. CWE will obtain required permits for the potholing. Deliverables include: Utility Research Maps & Documents, Utility Pothole Information, Topographic Survey Mapping, Base Utility Mapping, and Geotechnical Report. Task 3 — Prepare 75% Plans and Specifications CWE will take the approved concept and move to a final 75% design package. It is assumed that the previous reviews and decisions made at the prior submittals set the stage for the next submittals of the designs. Changes from previous submittals will be considered new work and is not part of the scope herein. The design will be based on the hydraulic analysis completed under the concept report phase of "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 6 A c-- NEUT. i\A\ Mr. David McBride July 25, 2014 Page 3 the project. As part of the 75% design, CWE will evaluate staging and traffic control, develop an approach to minimize impacts to park activities, evaluate constructability, and will be incorporated in the design plans. CWE will prepare plan and profile drawings with design modifications based on City input for the spur system. CWE will prepare plans and specifications to a 75% completion level based on design recommendations in conformance with the City of Temecula CADD Standards in AutoCAD release 2011. Plans will include: • Title Sheet with Construction Notes/General Notes • Preliminary Spur System Plan and Profile • Construction Details and Typical Sections • Preliminary Planting and Temporary Irrigation Plan Plan and profile sheets will be prepared for the spur system with 1"=50' horizontal scale and a 1" = 4' vertical scale. The planting and irrigation plans will be drawn at a scale of 1" = 20'. The plans will be designed to provide riparian habitat between the spur structures as partial mitigation for the project. If the upstream parcel owned by the homeowners association is to be used for mitigation, a planting plan will be developed for the park and upstream parcel. CWE will prepare draft details and technical specifications to supplement the construction drawing and City Standards. The technical specifications will be formatted to the latest edition of the "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction". ONE will modify the City standard boiler plate specification (to be supplied by the City) with project specific information and technical specifications. Deliverables include: Two (2) sets of full size bond prints of the 75% preliminary plans and two (2) draft bound copies of the specifications for City review. A PDF set of drawings and specifications will also be provided. CWE will teleconference with the City to review plan check comments and obtain input on the design. Task 4 — Prepare 90% Plans and Specifications CWE will incorporate 75% plan check comments and submit plans, bid documents with special provisions to the City and permitting agencies at the 90% completion stage. CWE will also finalize permit coordination activities, and incorporate conditions of these permits into the plans and specifications. Deliverables include: Two (2) sets of full size bond prints of the 90% preliminary plans and two (2) draft bound copies of the specifications for City review. A PDF set of drawings and specifications will also be provided. CWE will teleconference with the City to review plan check comments and obtain input on the design. Task 5 — Quantity & Cost Estimates CWE will prepare an estimate of probable construction cost for the improvements identified on the final construction plans and specifications. Cost estimates will include cost to be borne by the contractor in the bid documents and include a contingency for unforeseen changes. An engineer's estimate of the project will be submitted to the City to include individual bid items as shown on the bid schedule. Deliverables include: Two (2) sets of quantity and cost estimate calculations will be provided for City review at the 90%, and Final Plan stages of the project. CWE will have a teleconference with the City to review comments and obtain additional input. "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 7 AT �tcK , -- \\,0V Mr. David McBride July 25, 2014 Page 4 Task 6 — Prepare Permit Applications CWE will prepare permit application packages for the project. The permits expected will be for the Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Section 401 Permit for the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and a Section 1602 Permit through the Califomia Department of Fish and Wildlife. The project will also need approval from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and a City of Temecula grading permit. The permit application packages will be submitted to the City for review and revisions will be made based on comments from the City. Once approved by the City, the City will submit to the appropriate agencies. CWE will respond to comments by the regulators and provide one revision. It is assumed that any biological studies requested by the regulatory agencies will be provided by the City. Deliverables include: One (1) set of permit application packages will be provided for City for review. A PDF set of the packages will also be provided. One (1) set of revised permit application packages will be provided for City for submittal to regulatory agencies. A PDF set of the packages will also be provided. Task 7 — Submit Final Plans and Specifications CWE will make two separate submittals during the final design phase of the project. The first submittal will consist of one set of full size bond plan prints and bound specifications and bid documents for review. The submittal will consist of all permit packages, fully completed plans, bid documents, specification and estimate of probable construction cost. Upon acceptance of the 100% completion, the CWE will provide the City with one set of signed mylars of the drawings and one bond copy of the complete print ready bid documents and specifications. AutoCAD drawings and specification (MS Word format) of the completed project will be provided on a flash drive to the City. Assumptions, Limitations, and Exclusions Our services will be scheduled upon receipt of your written authorization. Work will be scheduled as soon as possible based on our current workload and the availability of qualified personnel. A tentative schedule is provided below based on the tasks and the expected number of working days. When the NTP is issued, a revised schedule will be provided. Unforeseen circumstances, such as site access, significant changes, or the discovery of conditions that significantly complicate or change the proposed services, may occur and result in the modification of the proposed fee. Our fee proposal has included the following assumptions: As -Built Drawings will be provided of Pala Park and the Upstream Housing Tract All permit fees will be paid by the Client "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 8 Mr. David McBride July 25, 2014 Page 5 Schedule: NTP 09/01/2014 Detailed Site Analysis 09/01/2014 — 10/15/2014 Prepare 75% Plans and Specification 10/06/2014 — 11/07/2014 Prepare 90% Plans and Specification 11/24/2014 — 12/31/2014 Quantity and Cost Estimates 12/01/2014 — 12/31/2014 Prepare and Submit Permit Application Packages 11/08/2014 — 12/15/2014 Submit Final Plans and Specifications 03/15/2015 — 03/31/2015 Fee Estimate The following fees apply to the tasks identified in the Scope of Work above. Task Fee Task 1— Meetings and Project Management $6,109 Task 2 - Detailed Site Analysis $16,357 Task 3 — Prepare 75% Plans and Specification $15,457 Task 4 — Prepare 90% Plans and Specification $16,057 Task 5 — Quantity and Cost Estimates $3,178 Task 6 — Prepare Permit Application Packages $16,248 Task 7 — Submit Final Plans and Specifications $4,788 Total $78,195 Terms and Conditions These proposed costs do not include any other items not listed in the above Scope of Work. Additional work and Construction Management services including bid and Request for Information (RFI) submittal reviews can be negotiated separately. This proposal and the pricing herein are valid for acceptance within 60 days from the proposal date. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (714) 526-7500 Ext. 212 or vbapna@cwecorp.com. Respectfully submitted, CWE Vik Bapna, PE, CPSWQ, QSD/P Principal "Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life." 9 2Fa2 Fa ! I I; . nap is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for general nce only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or vise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION. 6500 13000 19500 ft. Map center: 6294722, 212° 7Hk 1111 UI TEmEcuLA Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair /1) Nicolas Road:Park Warvesto- '" ke Park/ , jn�--c ‘, �., , fix ,, 1 ay :ton munity Park 4411g011it lir 4\ �� Long Cany• Creek Park e 41‘, rtiii aw Vet er 04a -41•M ‘ \ Sflt.htM4iretrA vliklipros--'1.44‘etca,1 Ronald Rea "� m Mi�`_i Mo ,-\\ r tent -Parks V Townk$\! a e Rotary Park A A II '= 0 xm z N A F IF I 0 •• ith A 10 A y N IA COv co 3 a CLUBHOUSE'DR TO RNAMENT LN,', 2015-16 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR Parks and Recreation Project Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. These park sites include Pala Community Park, Margarita Community Park, Butterfield Stage Park, and Long Canyon Creek Park. Benefit / Core Value: This project prevents further erosion into specific park sites. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of a Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: A priority list of projects has been developed. Repairs and reinforcements are completed on an ongoing basis. A study of the affected Parks is underway and will be completed during FY 2014-15. Design and construction of the recommended fixes will be implemented based on available fund. Department: Public Works / Temecula Community Services—Account No. 210.190.127 Level: Project Cost: Prior Years Actual Expenditures Fiscal Year Ended 2014 Carryover Budget 2014-15 Adopted Appropriation 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Project Projected Cost Projected Projected Projected Administration $ 10,841 $ 59,159 $ 70,000 Construction $ 45,531 $ 260,169 $250,000 $250,000 $ 805,700 Construction $250,000 $ 250,000 Engineering $ 56,372 $ 20,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $ 20,000 Design $ 104,300 $ 104,300 Totals $ 56,372 $ 443,628 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 Source of Funds: Prior Years Actual Expenditures Fiscal Year Ended 2014 Carryover Budget 2014-15 Adopted Appropriation 2015-16 Projected 2016-17 Projected 2017-18 Projected 2018-19 Total Project Projected Cost Capital Project Reserves $ 56,372 $ 443,628 $250,000 $ 750,000 Unspecified* $250,000 $ 250,000 Total Funding: $ 56,372 $ 443,628 $ - $250,000 $ - $250,000 $ - $1,000,000 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs 2014-15 *Project cannot be constructed until a funding source is identified. 133 2016-17 2018-19 Item No. 11 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for Pauba Road Sidewalks, PW 13-08 PREPARED BY: David McBride, Senior Engineer - CIP Chris White, Assistant Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Pauba Road Sidewalks, PW 13-08; 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. BACKGROUND: The proposed project consists of installing sidewalk along the northerly side of Pauba Road, from the north-easterly corner of Ynez Road to approximately 500 feet east of La Primavera Street. The proposed improvements also includes constructing curb and gutter, curb outlets, drive approaches and handicap ramps improvements. This project is exempt from the CEQA requirements pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301 Class 1(c), Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 states that minor alterations of existing highways, streets and gutters with negligible expansion of use beyond what currently exists are activities, which are exempt from CEQA. The Notice of Exemption was filed with the County of Riverside in July 2014. The 20 -day posting period has expired and the City did not receive any public comments. The project plans and specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pauba Road Sidewalks project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2015-19, and is funded with Capital Projects Reserves and Senate Bill 821 funds. The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $237,000. Adequate funds are available in the project Account No. 210.165.714. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Location 2. Project Description PAUBA ROAD SIDEWALKS Infrastructure Project Location Aerial Data - March 2012 114 Feet 0 162.5 325 650 Capita Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2015-19 PAUBA ROAD SIDEWALKS Infrastructure / Other Project Proiect Description: This project will include the construction of sidewalk along Pauba Road from just East of La Primavera to Ynez Road. Benefit / Core Value: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Value of Transportation Mobility and Connectivity and a Sustainable City. Project Status: This project is scheduled for construction in FY 2014-15. Department: Public Works—Account No. 210.165.714 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actual Expenditures FYE 2014 2014-15 Carryover Adopted Budget Appropriation 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Project Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Construction $ 350.000 $ 350,000 Construction $ 332,250 Engineering ' TotalFundinc: $ 25,000 $ - $ 488,400 $ - $ - $ 25,000 Design $ 488,400 $ 38,400 $ 38,400 Totals $ - $ - $ 488.400 $ - $ - $ - $ - S 488.400 Source of Funds: Prior Years Actual Expenditures FYE 2014 2014-15 Carryover Adopted 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 Total Project Budget Appropriation Projected Projected Protected Projected Cost Capital Project Reserves $ 156,150 $ 156,150 Senate Bill 821 $ 332,250 $ 332,250 TotalFundinc: $ - $ - $ 488,400 $ - $ - $ $ - $ 488,400 Future Operation & Maintenance Costs 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 115 Item No. 12 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager Sier- • CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Approval of the Plans and Specifications, and Authorization to Solicit Construction Bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs for Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW 14-07 PREPARED BY: David McBride, Senior Engineer - CIP Chris White, Assistant Engineer - CIP RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications, and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Concrete Repairs for Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW 14-07; 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. BACKGROUND: The Citywide Concrete Repairs is an annual project that repairs various concrete facilities maintained by the City. The Department of Public Works Maintenance Division has surveyed the City and compiled a list of existing improvements in need of repair. Under this project, damaged curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway approaches, under sidewalk drains, and ADA ramps at various locations will be removed and replaced. This project is exempt from the CEQA requirements pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 states that the repair and maintenance of existing highways, streets and gutters are Class 1 activities, which is exempt from CEQA. The project plans and specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. FISCAL IMPACT: The Engineer's Construction Estimate for the project is $435,870. Adequate funds are available in the Department of Public Works, Maintenance Division, Fiscal Year 2014-15 budget for routine street maintenance. ATTACHMENTS: Master List of Concrete Repair Areas City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Area 1 E/B Rancho Cal @ Town Center Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 E/B Rancho Cal © Town Center Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 6 6 36.00 E/B Rancho Cal 200' w/o Via Las Colinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Rancho Cal 100' w/o Via Las Colinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Rancho Cal 20' w/o Via Las Colinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 W/B Rancho Cal 100' w/o Via Las Colinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SIB Via Las Colinas 100' s/o Rancho Cal Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 E/B Via Las Colinas 100' s/o Rancho Cal Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Lyndie Lane 20' n/o Rancho Cal Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 60 6 360.00 N/B Lyndie Lane 100' n/o Rancho Cal Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 8 6 48.00 N/B Lyndie Lane 100' n/o Rancho Cal Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 8 6 48.00 42176 Lyndie Lane @ drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Rancho Cal 150' w/o Moraga © Car Wash Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Rancho Cal 250' w/o Moraga © Bus Bench Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) W/B Rancho Cal 350' w/o Moraga Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Rancho Cal 250' w/o Yukon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Rancho Cal 300' w/o Yukon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/W c/o Rancho Cal © Margartia Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 42185 Humber Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30268 Mersey Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30340 Tradewater Court Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 12 6 72.00 30340 Tradewater Court Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 12 12.00 42080 Humber Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 42056 Humber Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 30350 Guadalupe Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30395 Guadalupe Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 30425 Guadalupe Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 42025 Humber Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 42084 Roanoake Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 S/W c/o Roanoake Street @ Rubicon Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) N/E c/o Roanoake Street © Long Valley Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 7 70.00 31966 Humber Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30465 Shenandoa Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 41910 Humber Drive Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10.00 Humber Drive @ Ko River Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/W c/o Yukon Road © Rancho Cal. Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 20 20.00 30581 Iron Bark Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 42126 Teatree Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 42010 Teatree Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30591 Holly Berry Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 30531 Hollyberry Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 50 6 300.00 42006 Kaffirboom Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 42020 Kaffirboom Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41970 Kaffirboom Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 42060 Sweetshade Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 W/B Yukon 150' w/o Sweetshade Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) E/B Yukon 15' elo Copper Beech Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Yukon 20' elo Sweetshade Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Yukon 40' w/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 SIB Margarita Road 500' s/o Avenida Barca (across from Athletic field) Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/B Margarita Road 75' n/o La Serena Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30129 Corte San Luis Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30012 Corte San Luis Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Avenida Sonoma @ Corte Cantania Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Avenida Vista Ladera 50' n/o Corte Granada Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 29838 Corte Castille Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 8 8.00 29830 Corte Castille Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 8 8.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 1 58.00 3898.00 96.00 168.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 2 N/E c/o Paseo Brilliante @ Margarita Road Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 10 15 150.00 N/E c/o Paseo Brilliante @ Margarita Road Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 18 18.00 N/B Rancho Cal 100' n/o Avenida Sonoma Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) N/B Rancho Cal 100' slo Avenida Cima Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30000 Avenida Cima Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 29994 Avenida Cima Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 29964 Avenida Cima Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 29940 Avenida Cima Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 C/o 29770 Via Puesta Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 29792 Via Puesta Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 42104 Paseo Rayo Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 42088 Paseo Rayo Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 42081 Via Cuesta Al Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 42112 Paseo Sonrisa Del Sol Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 S/B Margarita 2nd driveway past Moraga Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 10 80.00 S/B Margarita 2nd driveway past Moraga Road Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 8 10 80.00 42211 Stonewood Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 16 6 96.00 42211 Stonewood Road Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 8 6 48.00 Across from 42064 Selby Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Across from 29706 Stonewood Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 N/B Margarita Road 100' B/F Via La Vida Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 6 180.00 29778 Calle Pantano Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 29734 Calle Pantano Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 15 15.00 Across from 41981 Via Renate Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41998 Via Renate Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/B Margarita Road 100' n/o Cara Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 18 6 108.00 S/B Margarita Road 30' s/o Courtney Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/B Margarita Road 70' s/o Courtney Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 35 6 210.00 S/B Margarita Road 100' s/o Courtney Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/W c/o Solana Way @ Via La Vida Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Solana Way 70' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 70 6 420.00 E/B Solana Way 150' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Solana Way 300' elo Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Solana Way 350' elo Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 E/B Solana Way 425' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) E/B Solana Way 500' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Solana Way 550' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Solana Way 600' e/o Aranda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41840 Skywood Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 29868 Vail Brook Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 29776 Nightview Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 29776 Nightview Circle Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 12 6 72.00 29880 Nightview Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 29880 Nightview Circle Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 12 6 72.00 N/E c/o Solana Way @ Rycrest Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/B Solana 300' b/f Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 W/B N. General Kearny Road 150' b/f Camino Campos Verdes Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/B N. General Kearny Road 200' b/f Camino Campos Verdes Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 N/E c/o Chantemar Way © Campana Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 40418 Chantemar Way Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 8 6 48.00 40528 Chantemar Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 27624 Sonora Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/B Verdes Lane 50' w/o Mancera Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Verdes Lane 100' w/o Mancera Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 S/E c/o Overland Drive © Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/E Ynez Road 50' b/f Promenade Mall S. Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 2 33.00 4426.00 230.00 240.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 3 N/B North General Kearny Road 30' b/f Sierra Madre Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39868 North General Kearny Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 North General Kearny Road @ Golden Rod Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 20 6 120.00 N/W c/o Moonlight Court @ Jacaranda Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39818 North General Kearny Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30503 Bogart Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39563 Warbler Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 Across from 27620 Parkside Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 27506 Parkside Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 39543 June Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39561 June Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39557 April Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39514 Terrill Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 40229 Toulomne Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 40234 Benwood Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 6 24.00 30318 Deer Meadow Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 30466 Deer Meadow Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30584 Milano Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 40072 Villa Venecia Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 S/E c/o Milano Road @ Adian Court Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 15 6 90.00 S/E c/o Milano Road @ Adian Court Spandrel R & R Spandrel 8 6 48.00 W/S North General Kearny Road @ Salerno Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 E/B Nicolas Road 200' b/f North General Kearny Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 E/B Nicolas Road 150' b/f North General Kearny Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) EIB Nicolas Road 100' e/o North General Kearny Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Across from 39409 Northgrate Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 31266 Ashmill Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 39588 Diego Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30909 Andrews Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 30856 Sandpiper Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 31431 Enfield Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 40626 Nob Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 40576 Windsor Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 40511 Windsor Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 40408 Windsor Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 40515 New Town Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 E/B Calle Katerine 100' e/o Windsor Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 40493 Calle Katerine Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 40493 Calle Katerine Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 40565 Calle Katerine Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Across from 40601 Calle Katerine Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 40811 Calle Medusa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 NIW c/o Chantilly Circle @ Klarer Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 WIB La Serena 100' w/o Walcot Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 27580 Senna Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 5 25.00 27574 Dandelion Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 39784 Roripaugh Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 3 0.00 2689.00 0.00 120.00 210.00 48.00 0.00 Area 4 50' No 43092 Calle Veronica @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Across from 43119 Corte Almonte Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43138 Corte Almonte Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43056 Corte Calanda @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 43080 Corte Calanda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 43140 Corte Calanda Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10.00 43036 Camino Casillas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 32023 Calle Espinosa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Across from 31922 Calle Espinosa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 42891 Camino Alagon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 42883 Camino Alagon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 42851 Camino Alagon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 32148 Corte Carmona Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 32007 Camino Molnar Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/B Camino Alagon 75' n/o McCabe Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B McCabe Drive 75' w/o Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Across from 42914 Via Jumilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32200 Camino Herencia Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 43049 Corte Devila Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/B Meadow Parkway 100' b/f Jasso Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 8 160.00 Across from 43998 Via Candeleda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 6 180.00 Via Pola 20' b/f Camino Caliari Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31950 Calle Ballentine Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 32075 Corte Algete Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 43540 Corte Ayala Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43545 Corte Ayala Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 31940 Calle Vimianzo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32023 Via Bonilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32023 Via Bonilla Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 15 15.00 South side of Via Denzo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 W/B Pauba Road 100' w/o Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 W/B Pauba Road 150' w/o Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 S/E clo Santiago Road © Via Alcorisa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 10 120.00 S/E clo Santiago Road © Via Alcorisa Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 20 18 360.00 Santiago Road © Corte Almonte Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 10 8 80.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 4 25.00 3100.00 360.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 Area 5 40289 Salem Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 Els Oak Park Lane @ Auburn Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 28984 Davenport Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 S/E clo Chatham Lane @ Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 40107 Annapolis Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 S/E clo Harveston Drive @ Pasadena Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 40173 Balboa Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 S/B Lakeview 100' s/o Date Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 S/B Lakeview 150' s/o Date Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 N/B Lakeview 75' n/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 N/B Lakeview 100' n/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 N/B Lakeview 125' n/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 Across from 39858 Camden Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 39753 Nantucket Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 Sherbourne Place © Cambridge Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 N/B Wellsey Court 30' w/o Povidence Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 N/W clo Wellsey Court @ Providence Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 8 64.00 N/B Harveston Drive 50' n/o Sherbourne Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 8 240.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) N/E c/o Harveston Drive @ Sherbourne Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 12 72.00 W/B Harveston Drive 150' w/o Charleston Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 8 48.00 W/B Harveston Drive 150' w/o Aberdeen Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 8 48.00 W/B Aberdeen Lane 20' w/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 N/B Harveston Drive 50' n/o Harveston School Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 E/B Harveston School 100' e/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 E/B Harveston School 120' e/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 E/B Harveston School 200' e/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 E/B Harveston School 250' e/o Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 W/B Harveston School 200' w/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 W/B Harveston School 250' w/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 W/B Harveston School 280' w/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 5 50.00 S/E c/o Harveston School @ Harveston Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 12 72.00 40055 Hudson Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 4 20.00 E/B Date Street 200' b/f Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 N/B Ynez Road 150' n/o Equity Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Across from 40750 County Center Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 26090 Ynez Road 70' n/o driveway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 26090 Ynez Road 100' n/o driveway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 26109 Ynez Road @ drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 S/B Ynez Road @ County Center Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 5 0.00 1952.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 6 31454 Royal Oaks Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 31454 Royal Oaks Drive Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 31531 Sandhill Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 41594 Laurel Valley Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 31465 Inverness Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 31410 Congressional Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 31308 Canterbury Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 31329 Canterbury Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 4 48.00 Temeku Drive @ Pin Way S/E corner Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Temeku Drive @ Pin Way SIE corner Handicap Ramp R &�R Handicap p 10 8 80.00 W/B Temeku Drive 200' b/f Par Way @ Parking Lot Enterance Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 W/B Temeku Drive 200' b/f Par Way © Parking Lot Enterance Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 W/B Crystalaire Drive 10' past Brassie Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 Brassie Lane @ Crystalaire Drive @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 30957 Mashie Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 30845 Mashie Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 4 16.00 Fore Way @ Brassie Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 4 16.00 30904 Balata Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 Across from 30904 Balata Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 Honors Drive @ Driver Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 Driver Lane @ Honors Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 31057 Iron Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 31025 Iron Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 Brassie Lane © Bunker Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 Brassie Lane © Niblick Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 41722 Niblick Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 41728 Niblick Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 E/B La Serena Road 50' e/o Margarita Road @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 30924 Wedge Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 41823 Vardon Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 30937 Eagle Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 30768 Point Woods Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 30724 Point Woods Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 42133 Southern Hills Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 42113 Southern Hills Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 4 48.00 Across from 30775 Medinah Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 18 4 72.00 30871 Medinah Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 Across from 30850 Branford Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 30890 Branford Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 30940 Branford Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 4 24.00 41451 Yankee Run Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 4 40.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 41373 Yankee Run Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 41486 Big Sage Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41573 Willow Run Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 41452 Willow Run Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 6 180.00 N/E c/o Via Aguilla @ La Serena Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 41221 Via Aguilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 41291 Via Aguilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/B La Serena 50' w/o Via Aguilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Calle Pina Colada 50' w/b of Salt River Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41189 Via Puerta Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 31008 Camino Del Este Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 50' e/o 31203 Camino Del Este Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 31219 Caminor Del Este Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 S/E c/o Camino Del Este @ Camino Verde Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 41111 Poco Via Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41145 Poco Via Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) SUBTOTALS - AREA 6 0.00 2534.00 80.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Area 7 S/E c/o Leena Way @ Abeto Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Sunny Meadows @ San Marco Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 32652 Campo Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Corbie Street © Nantes Court s/e corner Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43832 Calabro Street Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 3 3.00 Across from 43676 Savona Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 43703 Alcoba Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 43716 Alcoba Drive © catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/E c/o Sassari Street © Capri Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 32981 Paterno Street Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10.00 32978 Bonita Mesa Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 Across from 43878 Alcoba Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43846 Carini Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43946 Carentan Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 43922 Carentan Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43831 Carentan Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B De Portola 200' e/o Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 12 120.00 E/B De Portola 50' e/o Dives Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 12 240.00 W/B Campanula 100' b/f Pavia Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 43143 Jamara Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 24 6 144.00 43143 Jamara Court Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 24 24.00 32511 Puerto Oro Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 43140 Martina Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32573 Guevara Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 32780 Rovato Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 32128 Matera Court Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10.00 43137 Matera Court Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 20 20.00 43135 Volteara Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32848 Charmes Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 32788 Caserta Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 43064 Avola Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31720 Dartolo Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/b Dartolo Road 75' w/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Margarita Road 50' b/f De Portola Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 20' b/f De Portola Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 10 200.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 100' n/o Cassino Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 10 250.00 SIB Meadows Parkway 50' n/o Cassino Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 10 300.00 S/B Meadows Parkway 200' n/o De Portola Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 10 200.00 SIB Meadows Parkway 75' n/o Temecula Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 7 67.00 3412.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 8 Vallejo Avenue @ Palma Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 W/B Santiago Road 100' w/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Santiago Road 125' w/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 W/B Santiago Road 200' w/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Santiago Road 40' w/o Quiet Meadows Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) W/B Santiago Road 150' w/o Quiet Meadows Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 North end of C Street e/o drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 North end of C Street w/o drive approach Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 35 6 210.00 W/B Santiago Road © C street Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 40 10 400.00 29825 Santiago Road @ E. drive approach Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 8 80.00 43915 Northgate Avenue Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 43897 Northgate Avenue Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 43951 Highlander Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 44041 Highlander Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 44028 Highlander Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 44056 Highlander Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 43940 Gatewood Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 43898 Gatewood Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 29669 Via Mondo Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 Via Mondo @ Calle Nacido Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 29629 Via Mondo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 43326 Calle Nacido Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 43325 Calle Nacido Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 Via Asado @ Tierra Vista Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 N/B Corte Fresca 50' No Calle Nacido Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 28248 Tierra Vista Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 28267 Corte Malbino Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 43646 Buckeye Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Buckeye Road @ Preece @ S.N.S. Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 N/E c/o Preece @ Buckeye Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Calle Halcon 10' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 2 6 12.00 30032 Cielo Mesa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30068 Cielo Mesa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 30265 Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 28500 Elinda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 80 6 480.00 30317 Via Brisa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 30370 Via Brisa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 4 48.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 30350 Via Brisa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 4 48.00 30290 Via Brisa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 4 32.00 S/B Elinda Road 50' b/f Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Ynez Road 75' b/f Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Ynez Road 25' b/f Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/B Ynez Road 25' n/o Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 70 6 420.00 N/B Ynez Road 125' n/o Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 60 6 360.00 N/B Ynez Road 80' b/f Pauba Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 40 6 240.00 S/B Ynez Road @ Calle Halcon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/E c/o Ynez Road @ Pauba Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 E/B Pauba Road 10' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 E/B Pauba Road 50' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Pauba Road 100' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Pauba Road 125' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Pauba Road 250' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 E/B Pauba Road 275' e/o Ynez Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 6 180.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) E/B Pauba Road 30' e/o Via Alturas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Pauba Road © Elinda Road Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 8 12 96.00 Colina Verde @ Vista Del Rancho Cross Gutter R & R Cross Gutter 10 5 50.00 Casa Chata Place © Mira Loma Drive Spandrel R & R Spandrel 10 10 100.00 N/W c/o Mira Loma Drive © Santa Cecilia Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 8 6 48.00 S/B Mira Loma Drive 100' s/o Edison Plant entrance Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 8 80.00 S/B Mira Loma Drive 150' s/o Edison Plant entrance Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 10 8 80.00 SIB Mira Loma Drive 200' b/f Rancho Vista Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30096 Santa Cecilia Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30190 Santa Cecilia Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 42150 Agena Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 42201 Agena Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 30666 Southern Cross Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/W c/o Most easterly Mira Loma @ Rancho Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/W c/o Most easterly Mira Loma @ Rancho Vista Spandrel R & R Spandrel 10 3 30.00 W/B Rancho Vista 50' e/o Most easterly Mira Loma Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) W/B Rancho Vista 200' w/o Southern Cross Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 E/B Rancho Vista 10' e/o Most easterly drive approach of sportspark Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Rancho Vista 75' e/o Most easterly drive approach of sportspark Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 8 0.00 5744.00 224.00 140.00 450.00 130.00 1.00 Area 9 30413 Cupeno Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 30353 Pechanga Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 30542 Bay Hill Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 30569 Bridgeview Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 45750 Olympic Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 45775 Creekside Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 45668 Creekside Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 45644 Masters Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 48.00 Across from 45438 Clubhouse Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 45365 Tournament Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 45 45.00 45569 Tournament Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) E/B Bay Hill 60' e/o Clubhouse Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 45607 Gleneagles Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 45676 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 45701 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 45787 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 45800 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 45820 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 45840 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 45880 Classic Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 45928 Clubhouse Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/W c/o Muirfield Drive @ Pechanga Parkway Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 15 10 150.00 W/B Loma Linda 50' w/o Pechanga Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31008 Dulce Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 30980 Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 45304 Esmerado Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 45320 Esmerado Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 30953 Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 30616 E. Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 42320 Via Consuelo Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 12 6 72.00 42344 Via Consuelo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Across from 30909 E. Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 30819 E. Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 6 24.00 30780 E. Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30772 E. Loma Linda Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 31014 EL Osito Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 45365 Tejon Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 31214 Comotilo Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 31229 Comotilo Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 31248 Puas Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31117 Via Gilberto Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 31045 Via Gilberto Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31029 Via Gilberto Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) S/B Pashaho Drive 30' b/f Shaba Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Pashaho Drive 70' n/o Lahontan Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 31192 Lahonton Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 45661 Kimo Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 45644 Kimo Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 E/B Huron Street 50' e/o Jeronimo Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31299 Bocaw Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 31286 Bocaw Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 31278 Bocaw Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 Across from 45561 Piute Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31218 Eona Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 45895 Piute Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Next to 31429 Pahuta Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 31397 Pahuta Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 45857 Jeronimo Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Jeronimo Street 75' n/o Via Eduardo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 31440 Via Eduardo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/S Corte Sierra © Loma Linda Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Loma Linda @ Temecula Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 W/S Beech Court © Hickory Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 E/S Redwood Road © Wolf Creek Drive N. Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/S Basswood Court © Juniper Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 W/B Wolf Valley Road @ Wallaby Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 Across from 45639 Pheasant Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 45780 Jaguar Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Logger Trail @ Fireside Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/B Wolf Creek Drive S. @ Rocky Bar Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 SIB Wolf Creek Drive S. 100' b/f Pechanga Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 8 48.00 Across from 46033 Drymen Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 32192 Monte Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 9 45.00 4710.00 150.00 72.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W(LF) C&G Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Area 10 Across from 44369 Chaote Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 Chaote Street © Nottingham Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 W/B Channel Street 50' e/o Huntington Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 44389 Penbrook Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 W/B Channel Street 30' w/o Chaote Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120 S/E clo Channel Street © Chaote Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 S/E clo Channel Street © Chaote Street Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 8 6 48 33722 Channel Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 33933 Lydia Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 W/B Nighthawk Pass 100' w/o Chaote Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 E/B Nighthawk Pass 20' e/o Monticello Way Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 S/B Butterfield Stage Road 80' s/o Temecula Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 S/B Butterfield Stage Road 100' s/o Temecula Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 33194 Parown Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 6 24 Across from 33194 Parown Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) E/B Camino Piedro Rojo 20' e/o Vail Ranch Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 E/B Camino Piedro Rojo 50' e/o Vail Ranch Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 33277 Calle Cantu Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120 44597 Brice Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 N/W c/o Calle Cantu @ Jamin Circle Handicap Ramp R mp Handicap 6 10 60 44701 Corte Gutierrez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 44768 Corte Gutierrez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 44789 Corte Gutierrez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 44820 Calle Banuelos Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 Across from 33306 Calle Alfredo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120 44677 Lorraine Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 33195 Camino Maraca Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 32951 Romero Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 44539 Lauriano Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 44550 Lauriano Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 W/B Vail Ranch Parkway 100' e/o Overland Trail Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) W/B Vail Ranch Parkway 150' w/o Niclyn Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 W/B Vail Ranch Parkway 250' w/o Niclyn Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 32411 Hupp Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 W/B Overland Trail 50' e/o Red Hawk Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 W/B Overland Trail 100' e/o Red Hawk Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 S/B Country Glen 50' b/f Briarwood Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 S/B Country Glen 10' s/o Briarwood Place Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 S/W c/o Via Lucido @ Via Santa nves Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 Across from 44616 Via Lucido Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 44699 Corte Veranos Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 31963 Via Seron Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 32226 Via Benabarre Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 32194 Via Benabarre Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 32178 Via Benabarre Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120 45038 Camino Veste Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 45025 Corte Carolina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) Across from 45050 Corte Carolina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 45075 Corte Carolina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 45090 Corte Carolina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60 45100 Corte Carolina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 Across from 32230 Via Cordoba Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 S/E c/o via Cordoba @ Corte Valle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 45051 Corte Valle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90 31659 Via Saltio Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48 32214 Via Saltio Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30 Across from 45275 Paseo Durango Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36 31791 Camino Rosales Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120 31802 Camino Rosales Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 30 6 180 45595 Caminito Olite Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 45627 Caminito Olite Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 Across from 45627 Caminito Olite Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 3 3.00 45644 Corte Montril Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 45680 Corte Lobos Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 45664 Corte Lobos Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 45689 Calle Ayora Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 Across from 45681 Calle Ayora Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 45593 Calle Ayora Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 32206 Caminito Osuna Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 45912 Paseo Gallante Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 35922 Corte Carmello Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 S/E c/o EL Chimisal @ Vail Ranch Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/B Peppercorn 200' s/o Corte Barela Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/B Peppercorn 300' s/o Corte Barela Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/B Peppercorn © Corte Zargoza Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B RedHawk Parkway @ Camino Brozas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B RedHawk Parkway © Camino Brozas (@ gazeebo structure) Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 W/B RedHawk Parkway 20' w/o Tioga Street Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 E/B RedHawk Parkway 100' e/o Wolf Valley Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) EIB Red Hawk Parkway 150' e/o Wolf Valley Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 E/B Red Hawk Parkway 250' e/o Wolf Valley Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 N/B Red Hawk Parkway 70' n/o Red Hawk Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Red Hawk Parkway 250' n/o Red Hawk Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/B Red Hawk Parkway 50' b/f Overland Trail Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 50 6 300.00 45624 Via Puebla Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 45624 Via Puebla Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 5 5.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 10 8.00 5292.00 108.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Area 11 32392 Corte Palacio Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 42037 Camino Casana Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 East side of Via Torres (by catch basin) Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 Across from 32275 Corte Parado Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 32144 Camino Nunez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 32019 Camino Nunez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32053 Corte Florecita Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 41910 Via Vasquez Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32122 Corte Del Cerro Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 32121 Corte Del Cerro Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 West side of Calle Jabili Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 Camino Marea © Corte Balboa Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Via Toreno @ Corte La Puenta Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 32012 Camino Marea Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 31896 Camino Marea Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31857 Camino Marea Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32096 Calle Resaca Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 100' n/o Rancho Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 150' n/o Rancho Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 200' n/o Rancho Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 400' n/o Rancho Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 SIB Meadows Parkway 200' s/o Rancho California Road by catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/W c/o Rancho California Road © Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) S/B Butterfield Stage Road 300' No Pauba Road @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/B Butterfield Stage Road 300' s/o Rancho California Road by undersidewalk drain Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 31852 Corte Montecito Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31851 Corte Montecito Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 31830 Corte Montecito Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 S/W c/o Paseo Goleta @ Corte Padrera Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 Paseo Goleta @ Corte Sonora Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 31376 Corte Montiel Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 3 6 18.00 31430 Corte Montiel Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 31758 Corte Encinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 31766 Corte Encinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 31732 Corte Encinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 31560 Corte Salinas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 31491 Paseo De Las Olas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 41732 Via El Greco Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 31363 Corte Tunas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 31344 Corte Tunas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31353 Corte Tunas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 31375 Corte Tunas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 31489 Corte Pacheco Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31395 Corte Mallorca Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31643 Corte Rosario Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31737 Corte Rosario Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 East end of Calle Santa Ana Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 100' e/o Paseo Goleta Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 100' w/o Via EL Greco Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 12 6 72.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 200' w/o Via EL Greco Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 40 6 240.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 50' e/o Avenida De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 30920 Corte Arroyo Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 31010 Corte Alamar Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 30963 Corte De Los Santos Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 31052 Corte Alamar Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 200' e/o Margarita Road @ signal ahead sign Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 25 6 150.00 W/B Rancho Vista Road 100 e/o Margarita Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31100 Calle Aragon Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 Across from 31344 Corte Talvera Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 31344 Corte Talvera Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 Across from 31226 Corte Talvera Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 31226 Corte Talvera Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 50' s/o 41603 Avenida De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41573 Avendia De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 41472 Avenida De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41489 Avenida De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 Across from 41555 Avenida De La Reina Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/E c/o Avenida De La Reina @ Corte Talvera Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 8 64.00 N/E c/o Avenida De La Reina @ Corte Talvera Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 12 10 120.00 East side of Calle Bahia Vista Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) S/E c/o Rancho California Road @ Calle Tajo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 S/E c/o Rancho California Road @ Calle Tajo Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 12 12.00 S/E c/o Rancho California Road @ Calle Tajo Spandrel R & R Spandrel 10 8 80.00 Across from 41461 Calle Tajo Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 S/W c/o Rancho California Road @ Meadows Parkway Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 10 80.00 31335 Paseo De Las Olas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 31344 Paseo De Las Olas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31360 Paseo De Las Olas Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 11 12.00 5202.00 120.00 0.00 0.00 80.00 3.00 Area 12 41615 Riesling Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 30' n/o Rancho California Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 50' n/o Rancho California Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32020 Merlot Crest Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 32337 Cercle Beauregard Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 15 6 90.00 32310 Cercle Latour Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 31393 Chemin Chevalier Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 31389 Placer Condrieu Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 N/E c/o Promenade Chardonay Hills & Promenade Bordeaux Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 N/E c/o Promenade Chardonay Hills & Promenade Bordeaux Handicap Ramp R & R Handicap Ramp 10 6 60.00 Promenade Chardonay Hills @ Promenade Bordeaux Under Sidewalk Drain R & R Under Sidewalk Drain 1 1.00 31414 Heitz Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SIE c/o Promenade Chardonay Hills @ Heitz Lane Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 41064 Vintage Circle Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 70' b/f La Serena Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 N/B Meadows Parkway 50' b/f La Serena Road Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 12 0.00 948.00 60.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 Area 13 N/B Winchester Creek Avenue @ Springtime Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 Across from 27025 Winchester Creek Avenue Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 40 6 240.00 39100 Rising Hill Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 39149 Rising Hill Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 27051 Falling Creek Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 27051 Falling Creek Court Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 3 3.00 39512 Shadow View Court Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 40 6 240.00 W/B Rustic Glen 75' b/f Rainbow Creek Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39803 Oak Cliff Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 39804 Oak Cliff Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 39371 Oak Cliff Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 4 6 24.00 39425 Oak Cliff Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 39438 Oak Cliff Drive Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 6 6 36.00 27041 Rock Bluff Avenue Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 10 6 60.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 13 3.00 1044.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 14 43352 Business Park Drive Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 12 12.00 43320 Business Park Drive Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 20 20.00 43320 Business Park Drive Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 12 6 72.00 43200 Business Park Drive R & R Curb & Gutter 32 32.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm City of Temecula Department of Public Work FY 2014-2015 Master List of Concrete Repairs Areas and Quantities Project No. PW14-07 LOCATION Item SCOPE OF WORK L W C&G (LF) Sidewalk or Ramp Panel (SF) ADA Access Ramp (SF) Res. Drive Approach (SF) Cross Gutter (SF) Spandrel (SF) Under Sidewalk Drain (EA) 43200 Business Park Drive Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 32 6 192.00 28835 Single Oak Drive Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 20 20.00 28835 Single Oak Drive Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 20 6 120.00 28835 Single Oak Drive East entrance Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 10 10.00 28835 Single Oak Drive East entrance Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 10 6 60.00 50' e/o 28835 Single Oak Drive Curb & Gutter R & R Curb & Gutter 30 30.00 50' elo 28835 Single Oak Drive Drive Approach R & R Drive Approach 30 10 300.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 14 124.00 0.00 0.00 744.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Area 15 Across from 33439 Corte Mangarino Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 S/E c/o Via Sabino @ Corte Ebano Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 5 6 30.00 Next to 33570 Corte Bonilla Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 20 6 120.00 43350 Via Angeles @ catch basin Sidewalk R & R Sidewalk 8 6 48.00 SUBTOTALS - AREA 15 0.00 318.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 GRAND TOTALS 375.00 45269.00 1428.00 1544.00 740.00 258.00 7.00 r:\cip division\projects\pw14\pw14-07 citywide concrete repairs fiscal year 2014-15\1 - design files\iv.d.1 estimates\pw14-07-master list of areas and quantities for fy 2014-15.xlsm Item No. 13 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Approval of Parcel Map 36413 (Located at the Southwest Corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road) PREPARED BY: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer John Pourkazemi, Associate Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve Parcel Map 36413 (located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road) in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 2. Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Cash Deposit Agreement for Monumentation as security for this agreement. BACKGROUND: Record Title Interest: ACIE Investment, LP Parcel Map 36413 proposes to subdivide a 2.75 gross/net acres property into three parcels — 0.91 net acres, 0.90 net acres, and 0.94 net acres, respectively, for a commercial development. The property covered by this map is located at the southwest corner of De Portola Road and Margarita Road. Tentative Parcel Map No. 36413 (PA 11-0238) was approved by the Planning Commission on February 15, 2012, and is valid for three years, expiring on February 15, 2015. All public improvements are in place; however, the survey monuments have to be set. The property owner/developer is, thus, obligated to execute the Subdivision Monument Agreement and post the required security. The property owner/developer has met the terms of the Conditions of Approval for map recordation, and this map is in conformance with the approved tentative tract map. The approval of a subdivision map, which substantially complies with the approved tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fees and Securities Report 2. Vicinity Map 3. Reduced Copy of the Map CITY OF TEMECULA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO.36413 DATE: August 26, 2014 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY LABOR & MATERIALS SECURITY Monumentation $ 8,000 - DEVELOPMENT FEES: RCFC&WCD (ADP) Fee $ N/A Development Impact Fee $ To Be Paid SERVICE FEES: Planning Fee $ 365 Fire Fee $ 259 CSD Fee $ 176 Map Check Fee $ 3,319 Monumentation Inspection Fee $ 343 Fees Paid to Date $ 4,462 Balance of Fees Due $ 0 VICINITY MAP NO SCALE GROSS BOUNDARY AREA: 2.75 ACRES NET BOUNDARY AREA: 7.75 ACRES NUMBER OF NUMBERED PARCELS: 3 NUMBER OF LETTERED PARCELS: 1 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES 24 AIRSPACE UNITS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 36413 BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 26 OF TRACT N0. 3752, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN HOOK 59, PAGES 53- 55 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES SWS ENGINEERING, INC, AUGUST, 2014 OWNER'S STATEMENT WE HEREBY STATE. THAT Mt ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND; THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. WE HEREBY DEDICATE TO 111E PUBLIC USE F011 STREET AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES AN EASEMENT OVER PARCEL "A". W. ALSO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA AN EASEMENT OVER THE "PRIVATE ROAD" FOR PUBLIC 11711110 EASEMENT AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS PURPOSES AS SHOWN ON THIS MAP. WE HEREBY RETAIN THE "PRIVATE ROAD" (RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS ACCESS EASEMENT), FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS AND PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF OURSELVES. OUR SUCCESSORS, ASSIGNEES AND PARCEL OWNERS 611HI4 THIS PARCEL MAP. WE HEREBY DEDICATE ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORT010 ROAD TO THE P119113. THE OWNERS OF PARCELS ABUTTING THESE HIGHWAYS AND DURING SUCH TIME WILL HAVE NO RIGHTS OF ACCESS EXCEPT THE GENERA/. EASEMENT OF TRAVEL AND EXCEPTING ONE 28 -FOOT 9101 ACCESS OPENING ON MARGARITA ROAD AND ONE 25 -FOOT WDE ACCESS OPENING ON DE 70919).0 ROAD, ANY CHANGE OF ALIGNMENT OR WD1H THAT RESULTS IN THE VACATION THEREOF SHALL TERMINATE THIS DEDICATION AS TO 111E PART VACATED. AC'E INVESTMENT, LP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP BY: JEFF 5HANG GENERAL. PARTNER NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ON BEFORE MF.. , A NOTARY PUBLIC PERSONALLY APPEARED.._ , WHO PROVIDED TO ME ON 111E BASIS OF SATISFACTORY EVIDENCE TO 8E THE 779005)5) WHOSE NAME(5) 15/ARE SUBSCRIBED TO THE WTHIN INSTRUMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO LAE THAT 11E/5HE/THEY EXECUTED THE SAME IN HIS/HER/THIER AUTHORIZED CAPACITY(IES), AND THAT 130 HIS/HER/THEIR SIGNATURE(5) ON THE INSTRUMENT THE PERSON(S), OR THE ENTITY UPON BEHALF OF WHICH 711E PERSON(S) ACTED, EXECUTED 111E INSTRUMENT. I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7115) THE FOREGOING PARAGRAPH IS TRUE AND CORRECT. 4415E55 MY (LAND: NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE PRINT NAME MY PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IS IN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MY COMMISSION N.-- _ COUNTY SIGNATURE OMISSIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 66436 OF 111E SUBDIVISION MAP ACT, THE SIGNATURES OF THE FOLLOWING OWNERS OF EASEMENTS AND/OR OTHER INTERESTS HAVE BEEN OMITTED: EASEMENT FOR OVERHEAD ANO UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL. SUPPLY 500117/S AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDI50N PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 9741 O.R. EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL. 17, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 2008-0191538 0.12. EASEMENT FOR TELEPHONIC COMIAUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, VIDEO, AND/OR INTELLIGENCE BY ELECTRICAL OR OTHER MEANS AND/OR PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF VERI7.ON CALIFORNIA INC. PER DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 14, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 2008-0449922 0.9, EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND INCIDENTAL. PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 13, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 2010-0013837 0.R, SHEET 1 OF 3 SMELTS RECORDER'S STATEMENT FILED THIS ______ DAY 07 2014 AT _....__.__.M. 114 BOOK : OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES Al THE REQUEST OF THE CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA. N0. FEE LARRY W. WARD, COUNTY ASSESSOR. CLERK, RECORDER SUBDIVISION GUARANTEE BY. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT THIS MAP WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANCE AT THE REQUEST OF TEMECULA DEVELOP/AIM) ILC IN JANUARY, 2012.1 HEREBY STATE THAT ALL 59)609ENTS ARE OF THE CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE POSITIONS INDICATED, OR WILL BE SET IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE TERMS OF THE MONUMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAP, AND TI1A1 SAID MONUMENTS WILL BE SUFFICIENT TO ENABLE THE SURVEY TO BE RETRACED. I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMS TO THE APPROVED OR CONDITIONALLY APPROVED TENTATIVE MAP, IF ANY. DATED: JUSTIN 5. PALLAMARY EXP. 12/31/15 CITY ENGINC[R'S_STATEMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP CONSISTING OF 3 SHEETS IIAS 9119 EXAMINED BY ME 01) UNDER MY 5110E2VI5I09 AND FOUND TO 131 SUBSTANTIALLY 111E SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVE MAP OF PARCEL. MAP NO, 35413 AS FILED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA ON 2/15/2012, THE EXPIRATION DATE BEING 7/15/2015, THAT ALL PROV1510NS OF APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND CITY REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, AND THAT 1 AM SATISFIED TIIIS MAP IS TECHNICALLY CORRECT. DATED: . 2014. KRIS R. WINCHAK I..S. 6240 (AS DELEGATED) CITY OF TEIAECUI.A TAX COLLECTOR'S CERTIFICATE FOR THOMAS W. GARCIA CITY ENGINEER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RECORDS OF TIIIS OFFICE, AS OF THIS DATE, THERE ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE PROPERTY SHOWN ON THE WITHIN MAP FOR UNPAID STATE, COUNTY. MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL TAXES OR SPECIAL. ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, EXCEPT TAXES OR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, NOW A LIEN BUT NOT YET PAYABLE, WHICH ARE ESTIMATED TO B1 DATED: _._ , 2014. DON KENT, COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR DEPUTY TAX BOND CERTIFICATIi. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT A BOND IN THE SIVA OF $ _ .- HAS BEEN EXECUTED AND FILED WITH TILE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF DIE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONED UPON TILE PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, STATE, COUNTY, MUNICIPAL., OR LOCAL, AND ALL SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS COLLECTED AS TAXES, WHICH AT THE TIME OF FILING OF THIS MAP WTH THE COUNTY RECORDER ARE A LIEN AGAINST SAID PROPERTY BUT NOT YET PAYABLE AND SAID BOND HAS BEEN DULY APPROVED BY SAID BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. DATED: .2014. CASH TAX BOND DON KENT COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR BY DEPUTY KECIA 1IA12P3R-THEM CLERK OF 1117 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BY: DEPUTY NOTICE OF ELECTION BY LAND DIVIDER TO DEFER PAYMENT OF DRAINAGE FEES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE 1/0881ETA CREEK/TEMECULA VALLEY AREA DRAINAGE PLAN WHICH WAS ADOPTED 8Y 'DIE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.25 OF ORDINANCE 460 AND SECTION 66483, ET. SEQ. OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE AND SAID PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO FEES FOR SAID DRAINAGE AREA. NOTICE IS 70141/1118 GIVEN THAT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 10.25 OF ORDINANCE 460, 7111: LAND DIVIDER HAS ELECTED TO DEFER PAYMENT OF THE DRAINAGE FEE TO THE 111AE OF ISSUANCE OF EITHER A GRADING OR BUILDING PERMIT FOR SAID PARCELS AND THAT THE OWNER OF EACH PARCEL, AT 711E TIME OF ISSUANCE OF EITHER A GRADING OR BUILDING PERMIT, SHALL BE REQUIRED TO PAY THE FEE REQUIRED AT 711E RATE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF THE ACTUAL PERMIT. CITY CLERK'S STATEMENT -------.- ._._.._.__.._.-- THE CITY COUNCIL OF TILE CITY OF TEMECULA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK, RANO) 3511) 0L5EN, JD, MMC, HEREBY APPROVES THE PARCEL MAP AND ACCEPTS ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE DEDICATION OF AN EASEMENT OVER PARCEL A FOR STREETS AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.. WE HEREBY ACCEPT THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF AN EASEMENT OVER THE "PRIVATE ROAD" FOR PUBLIC UTILITY AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS PURPOSES AS DEDICATED. Wf. AL50 HEREBY ACCEPT THE OFFER OF DEDICATION OF ABUTTERS RIGHTS OF ACCESS ALONG MARGARITA ROAD AND DE PORTOLA ROAD AS DEDICATED. DATED: .__._......_.._._ __...__.. 2014 RAND JOHN-OLSf.N, JD, MMC CITY CLERK, CITY OF TEMECULA SECRETARY, TEMECULA COIAMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PROJECTED SECTION 17, T8S, 92W LD1 /1- 005MP IN THE CITY OF TEMECUL.A, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 36413 MONUMENT NOTES FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES pi FOUND 1" I -P. W/TAG 'LS 7238', FLUSH, NO BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 26 OF TRACT N0. 3752, AS SHOWN BY MAP ON FILE IN 9005 59, REFERENCE, ACCEPTED AS POINT ON LINE PAGES 53 - 55 INCLUSIVE OF (AAPS, R1CORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PER P.M. 78384 (P.M.B. 190/43-45) SWS ENGINEERING, INC. MAY, 2014 LJ FOUND 1" I.P. W/ILLEGIBLE TAG, 611159, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PER P.M. 28384 (P,61 8. 190/43-45), RESET 100 '1.6 7385' pi FOUND 1" I.P. NO TAG, FLUSH, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE B.C. PER TR. NO. 3752 (9.B, 59/53-55), SET TAG 'LS 7385' 641 FOUND 1-1/4" I.P. W/TAG 'LS 2607', DOWN 2.0', PER TR, N0, 3757 (A.B. 59/53-55) Q FOUND I" I.P. NO TAG, FLUSH, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PER P.M. 29510 (P,M,B, 196/35.-36), SE1 TAG 1.0 7385 `_ E FOUND WELL. MONUMENT 48111 BRASS DISK STAMPED 'CALIF DEPT TRANS', DOWN 0.5', ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PER C.R. 02-106 AND P,M. 28384 (P,M.8, 190/43-45) Lid FOG; I.P. W/�0A5 'LS 6153', FLUSH, PER 2.8.29510 (P.M.B. 196/35-36), ACCEPTED A5 POINT ON CCNIERUNE U FOUND 1-1/4" LP. 'L5 2602', FLUSH, PER TR. N0. 3752 (M.O. 59/53--55) L'J FOUND 1-1/4" I.P. '1.0 2602', DOWN 1.4', IN LIEU OF 3/4 I.P, '1.5 7602' PER if?. N0. 3752 (1.1,B. 59/53._55) 117 FOUND SPIKE & WASHER W/TAG 'LS 5411', FLUSH, PER C.R. 10-0646, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE B.C. PER TR. N0. 3752 (M.8. 59/53-55) 1"1 FOUND SPIKE & WASHER W/1AG 'LS 5411', 61.1159, PER C.R. 10-1159, ACCEPTED AS CENTERLINE E.C. PER TR. N0. 3752 (6.8, 59/53-55) 72 FOUND WELL MONUMENT WITH BRASS DISK STAMPED 'S 5411', DOWN 0.5', PER C.R. 10--1159, ACCEPTED A5 CENTERLINE INTERSECTION PER TR. 3752 (6LB. 59/53-55) 13 FOUND 1" I.P. W/TAG 'LS 3799', UP 0.2', PER P.M. 13043 (P,M.8. 70/21-22) 10 SEARCHED FOR, NOT FOUND -C7 j O N 5534'58" 1 60,94' O,» - (N 55'35'04" E 61.18') y _ O �0 .-17'51'4- 0.00; I 467.60' (N 73'2G'n 4' E 1318.4A') ' `�_ O (A=17'51'40 8-1500.001 4467 j60-')>- j'- 998.32' 1998,48') -�\ /' RE y. I N 737638 E 'a 920:76' of ` 1`370,01' (320.0\ 56' TA H$I (N 732644^ 1 szDs2') - 81 141 )._. Ig 121 ? < 670.80' 1,(670.92* CALC.) -` /- 249.96' (250 .00') PARCF.I. "A" E \__j3 `,°\°'r'13R\\00 SEARCHED, NOTHING FOUND- '\ SET CORNER BY SINGLE � �- 25' MME 50Q'._ J SURVEYOR'S NOTES PRORATION 4_ ,_ ACCESS OPENING N 61'44'44" W .}2.42 __ ''''''*---,(A'89.37'6" [N 61'44'41" W 37..47'] '"\'J 1223.00' ^I/L-35.98' -1 ^ PARCEL 1• oil/ 0.91 AC. ,1 �%- 210.09' N 7.3'03'54" E N 73'26'38" E DL POR I OLA SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS s 0. 46, I_°CATION a. \E` VICINITY MAP I/O SCALE ROAD 1318 33' • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENTS AS NOTED U DENOTES SE1 1" I.P. TAGGED LS. 7385, FLUSH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED () DENOTES RECORD DATA PER TR, N0. 3752 (M.8. 59/53-55) < > DENOTES RECORD DATA PER P.IA. 36219 (P,88. 231/58-60) (1 )1 DENOTES RECORD DATA PER P.M. 28384 (P.M.B. 190/43-45) [ 3 DENOTES RECORD DATA PER DOC. RECORDED 11/20/2000 AS INSTRUMENT N0, 2000-475175 O.R. \ INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS THIS PARCEL MAP CONTAINS 7.75 ACRES GROSS WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHALL 80 KEPT FREE OF BUILDINGS AND OBSTRUCTIONS AL1. MONUMENTS SET PER RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 461.9 ALL MONUMENTS SHOWN A5 "sue' SHALL BE SET 1N ACCORDANCE WITH THE MONUAIE816010N AGREEMENT FOR THIS MAP, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BASIS OF BEARINGS 111E BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A POR110N OF THE CENTERLINE OF MARGARITA ROAD AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP N0, 28384 FILED IN BOOK 190 PAGES 43 - 45 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, BEING N 16'56'06" W ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINT NOTE 111E ENVIIRONMAENTAI. CONSTRAINT SHEET AF1'111)1NG THIS MAP 15 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER, CITY OF TEMECULA IN 6.05 BOOK T, PAGE 376 AND AFFECTS ALL PARCELS IN THIS SUBDIVISION. EASEMENT NOTES SEE SHEET 3 4j h 4 n N 63 74 87' • 1 / 199.9'2' <74 90'> "\I/ * <200.04'> �- I 8 ----[1131 ��I 4646/ rvs"/ 7 60 30' 0' 60' 120' 180' SCAN, IN FEET GRAPHIC SCALE NA NN PARCEL 2 0.90 AC. 0 FI -139.90' N 73'03154" E 40.47' O ‘,8,)� N 16'5529" W a � 79.00'- N 73'04'09' E 7.40' I PARCH, 3 -55.93' 1 0.94 AC. 9 / .r 8 73-04'09" 6 1 20' 6001 9 / ACCESS OPENING�-1� / PRIVATE (ROAD (SEE SHEET 3) - 1 C, 55 I) n 27963 (275.;)5) <27569'>03 y?g o I/ " I/ " 91/ I/ 1/ N 73'03'07" 1: 550.42' (N 73'03'54" E 550.76') <9 73'04'17" E 550.02'> P.M. NO. 36219 (OK. 231 / PG. 58 -- 60) DAR TOL() ROAD N 7.3'24540" F 679.74' M 73'24'46" E 679,33'> BOUNDARY AND MAP SHEET T1:9E161 A 67' b 9 PARKWAY STATE HIGHWAY 79 (SOUTH) 25.00' WIDE ACCESS OPENING /_\6.00' 91 1.2 (3 \ - 14 IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PARCEL MAP NO. 36413 FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 26 OP TRACT N0. 3752, A5 SHOWN HY MAO ON 011.0 IN 1300K 59, PAGES 53 - 55 INCLUSIVE 01" MAPS, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, 0811000NIA. SWS ENGINEERING, INC. MAY, 2014 I a EASEMENT SHEET DE PORTOLA ROAD N 73'26'38" E 249.96' \ 18.00' N 16'56'06" W 7.01' 196.04' N 61'44'44W PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 14.00' 91 `- 218.91 PRIVATE 243.92' _of 7-6j 7-Zrj 712.00' I N 73'03'07" E - / / / / / / / / / / 1 N 73'03'07" li 1 129.50' L 6.00' N 73'03'07" 0 7.00' PARCEL. 3 / / / / N 73'06'06" E ROAD 28.00' WIDE N 73'06'06" F ACCESS OPENING,1 1e_Jto0DX �.a� 146.00' \-89'37'10 12=23.00' 1.---35.90' 1000' EASEMENT NOTES GIS "PRIVATE ROAD" (RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS ACCESS EASEMENT) RETAINED HEREON A EASEMENT FOR PU81.I0 UTILITIES, DRAINAGE AND EQUESTRIAN PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE GENERAL. PUBLIC AS REQUESTED IN GRANT 5EEO RECORDED AUGUST 09, 1973 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 104538 O.R. A EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAY PURPOSES, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY AND - I UBI.IC SERVICE FACILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PER DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 29, 2000 A5 INSTRUMENT N0. 2000-475175 O.R. ACCEPTED BY CITY 00 TEMECULA PER DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEIAOER 29, 2000 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 2000-475176 O.R. A\ EASEMENT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL 029005E5 IN FAVOR OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 17, 2008 A5 INSTRUMENT N0. 2008-0191538 O.R. EASEMENT FOR TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATIONS, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, 0DEO, INTELLIGENCE BY ELECTRICAL. OR OTHER MEANS AND/OR PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF 0091009 CALIFORNIA INC. PER DOCUMENT RECORDED AUGUST 14, 2008 A5 INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0449922 O.R. EASEMENT CANNOT BE PLOTTED FROM THE RECORD. A EA5EIAENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND - COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EI)I508 PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 13, 2010 A5 INSTRUMENT N0. 2010-0013837 O.R. EASEMENT FOR OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SYSTEMS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON PER DOCUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 30, 1969 AS INSTRUMENT 00. 9041 O.R. 40' 20' 0' 40' 80' 120 SCALE IN FEET GRAPHIC SCALE 275.63' (9) MARGARITA SI -TELT 3 OF 3 SHEETS UNE DMA --- -NG BEARING DIST. LI N 73'06'31" E 29.32' N73'26'30" E 28.92' N 16'55'51" W. 35.66' _N 73'06'31" E__ N 73'04'09" E 23.29' L6 N 16'56'00 W 10.00' 12 13 L4 15 SURVEYOR'S NOTES • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENTS AS NOTED O DENOTES SET 0 I.P. TAGGED 1,5. 7385, FLUSH, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 0 \ \ \ \ INDICATES RESTRICTED ACCESS RIGHTS Item No. 14 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager Seer - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Thomas Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 26, 2014 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map 23065-3 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 23065-3) BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 23065-3 was recorded by the County Recorder on December 23, 2005. The owners, Redhawk Communities, Inc., dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the map. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication subject to improvements constructed in accordance with City Standards. Public Works staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. The Warranty Bond currently being held will be released at the end of the required one-year warranty period. The public streets, and associated City drainage improvements, now being accepted by this action are as follows: Tract 23065-3 Primrose Avenue, Peach Tree Street, Ritter Court, Dorset Court, Ritchart Court, portion of Pechanga Road, and portion of Vine Street. Said streets are more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B" as attachments to the Resolution FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every five to eight years. ATTACHMENT: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 23065-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Tract Map 23065-3 was originally approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and recorded by the County Recorder on May 21, 2004, in which offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes were accepted by the County of Riverside from Redhawk Communities, Inc. Section 2. The Tract is located within the Redhawk area which was annexed into the City of Temecula on June 30, 2005. Section 3. City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Section 4. The Warranty Bond currently being held will be released at the end of the required one-year warranty period. Section 5. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City -Maintained Street System all streets within Tract Map 23065-3 and associated City drainage improvements offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 14 - Accepting certain public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Map 23065-3 into the City -Maintained Street System as described as follows: Tract Map 23065-3 1. Lot "A" (Primrose Avenue) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 2. Lot "B" (Peach Tree Street) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 3. Lot "C" (Ritter Court) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 4. Lot "D" (Dorset Court) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 5. Lot "E" (Ritchart Court) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 6. Lot "F" (portion of Pechanga Road) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 7. Lot "G" (portion of Vine Street) of said Tract Map No. 23065-3 EXHI3IT >> 3" TO RESOLUTIO\ \O. 2014 - TRACT VAP 23065-3 AY 0 PROJECT SITE P£CHANGA ROAD V C \ TY MAP NO SCALE k. 80 in84 82 81 fi 134 RESERVATION Item No. 15 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager .14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/City Council Thomas Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer August 26, 2014 Acceptance of Certain Public Streets into the City -Maintained System within Tract Map 30264-1, -5, -8, and -11 PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Mayra De La Torre, Senior Engineer Steve Charette, Associate Engineer That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 30264-1, -5, -8 AND -11) BACKGROUND: Tract Map Nos. 30264-1, -5, -8 and -11 were recorded by the County Recorder on the following dates: Tract Map No. 30264-1 Tract Map No. 30264-5 Tract Map No. 30264-8 Tract Map No. 30264-11 April 26, 2005 July 26, 2005 April 26, 2005 July 26, 2005 The owners, Wolf Creek Development, LLC, dedicated to public use for street and public utility purposes streets designated as lettered lots on the four maps. The City Clerk accepted the offers of dedication subject to improvements constructed in accordance with City Standards. Public Works staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all required repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. The Warranty Bonds currently being held will be released at the end of the required one-year warranty period. The public streets (and associated City drainage improvements) now being accepted by this action are as follows: Tract 30264-1 Forest Falls Way, portion of Cloudburst Lane, portion of Gold Mine Drive, Bitterroot Court, and Lodge House Court. Tract Map 30264-5 Portion of Logger Trail, portion of Fireside Drive, Miner Trail, Hunter Trail, and portion of Rocky Bar Drive. Tract Map 30264-8 Portion of Woodside Court, portion of Woodside Court, portion of Logger Trail, portion of Logger Trail, Live Oak Drive, portion of Maple Drive, portion of Hunter Lodge Lane, and Elk Grove Court. Tract Map 30264-11 Yosemite Lane, Canyon Crest Court, Durango Drive, and portion of Rock Bar Drive. Said streets are more specifically described in Exhibits "A" and "B" as attachments to the Resolution. Tracts 30264-2, -3, -4, -7, -9, -10, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -F within the Wolf Creek development have been previously accepted into the City -Maintained System. The remaining Tract 30264-6 is currently still under construction. FISCAL IMPACT: Periodic surface and/or structural maintenance will be required every five to eight years. ATTACHMENT: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 14- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS INTO THE CITY -MAINTAINED SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP 30264-1, -5, -8 AND -11) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Tract Map Nos. 30264-1 and -8 and Tract Map Nos. 30264-5 and - 11 were recorded by the County Recorder April 26, 2005 and July 26, 2005 respectively, in which offers of dedication for street and public utility purposes were accepted by the City of Temecula from Wolf Creek Development, LLC. Section 2. City Public Works Staff reviewed and inspected the public improvements and all repairs and replacements were satisfactorily completed. Section 3. The Warranty Bond currently being held will be released at the end of the required one-year warranty period. Section 4. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby accepts into the City -Maintained Street System the streets and associated City drainage improvements offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula described in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 14- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 14 - Accepting certain public streets offered to and accepted by the City of Temecula as indicated on Tract Maps 30264-1, -5, -8, and 11 into the City -Maintained Street System as described as follows: Tract Map 30264-1 1. Lot "A" (Forest Falls Way) of said Tract Map No. 30264-1 2. Lot "B" (portion of Cloudburst Lane) of said Tract Map No. 30264-1 3. Lot "C" (portion of Gold Mine Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-1 4. Lot "D" (Bitterroot Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-1 5. Lot "E" (Lodge House Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-1 Tract Map 30264-5 1. Lot "A" (portion of Logger Trail) of said Tract Map No. 30264-5 2. Lot "B" (portion of Fireside Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-5 3. Lot "C" (Miner Trail) of said Tract Map No. 30264-5 4. Lot "D" (Hunter Trail) of said Tract Map No. 30264-5 5. Lot "E" (portion of Rocky Bar Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-5 Tract Map 30264-8 1. Lot "A" (portion of Woodside Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 2. Lot "B" (portion of Woodside Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 3. Lot "C" (portion of Logger Trail) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 4. Lot "D" (portion of Logger Trail) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 5. Lot "E" (Live Oak Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 6. Lot "F" (portion of Maple Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 7. Lot "G" (portion of Hunter Lodge Lane) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 8. Lot "H" (Elk Grove Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-8 Tract Map 30264-11 1. Lot "A" (Yosemite Lane) of said Tract Map No. 30264-11 2. Lot "B" (Canyon Crest Court) of said Tract Map No. 30264-11 3. Lot "C" (Durango Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-11 4. Lot "D" (portion of Rock Bar Drive) of said Tract Map No. 30264-11 SHEET 1 OF 4 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - TRACT MAP 30264-1 01111. , WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SITE S VICINITY NAP NO SCALE EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2014- SHEET 2 OF 4 TRACT MAP 30264-5 LOGGER TRAIL WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SITE V C\ TY V A P NO SCALE EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2014 - TRACT MAP 30264-8 HUNTER LODGE LANE LOT "G" MAPLE DRIVE LOT "F" 66 8/O0-S�FF� rQ/ r WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMEP PROJECT SITE VICI \TY MAP NO SCALE EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION NO. 2014- SHEET 4 OF 4 TRACT MAP 30264-11 ROCKY BAR DRIVE WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT SITE VC\ITY NO SCALE V AP Item No. 16 ORDINANCE NO. 14-05 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0131, AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE THE LAND USE PLAN MAP FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND OPEN SPACE (OS) ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO); PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21, 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ords 14-05 1 F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On August 12, 2014, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14-52 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and Zone Change to a PDO. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project design is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area; The proposed General Plan Amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because it has been designed as a conservation/cluster development to provide a transition between high and low density development within the rural Nicolas Valley. The proposed development will preserve approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site, and provide additional trails and Ords 14-05 2 preserve habitat. In addition, the General Plan Amendment is accompanied by a Home Product Review Application that has been reviewed and conditioned to provide homes of a high quality design via appropriate massing, roofline variation, high quality and varied materials, and floor plan square footage consistent with existing development in the surrounding area. Section 3. Amendment of General Plan Land Use Map. The City Council hereby amends the Land Use Element of the Temecula General Plan to change the Land Use Plan Map from very low (VL) density residential to low (I) density residential and Open space (os) on 73 gross acres at the southeast corner of Via Lobo and Nicolas Road (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020). A map showing the location of the property subject to this General Plan land use map is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Ords 14-05 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 14-05 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 12th day of August, 2014, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk Ords 14-05 4 ORDINANCE NO. 14-06 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA12-0132, ADDING SECTIONS 17.22.254 THROUGH 17.22.266, INCLUSIVE, PDO -13 ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY, TO CHAPTER 17.22 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE AN AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A ZONING MAP AND TEXT CHANGE FROM VERY LOW (VL) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO -13, ARBOR VISTA PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT) BASED ON THE STANDARDS OF THE LOW (L) DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATION WITH PROVISIONS FOR A CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND OPEN SPACE ON 73 GROSS ACRES AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VIA LOBO AND NICOLAS ROAD (OS) (APNS 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 12, 2012, Mr. Lenny Dunn filed Planning Application Nos. PA12- 0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. On May 21, 2014, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA) and circulated for public review from April 21, 2014 to May 20, 2014 for a 30 -day public review. Copies of the documents have been available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. Ords 14-06 1 E. On May 21, 2014, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, the Planning Commission considered the Project and any comments received prior to or at the public hearing on May 21, 2014, at which time the City staff presented its report, and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Project the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Project. G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Project including Planning Application Nos. PA12-0131, General Plan Amendment; PA12-0132, Zone Change to a PDO; PA12-0133, Tentative Tract Map 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. H. On August 7, 2014, the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 14-52 adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed Zone Change is consistent with the land use designation in which the use is located, as shown on the Land Use Map, General Plan and Development Code; This application is accompanied by Tentative Tract Map 36479, Home Product Review Application and General Plan Amendment from VL -Very Low Density to L -Low Density Residential. The General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to a PDO establish the density and design framework for the proposed cluster subdivision development. The proposed design preserves approximately 39 acres of the 73 gross acre site in permanently preserved open space, thereby promoting the goals of the General Plan to preserve habitat and provide additional trails and active parkland. The project is consistent with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Ords 14-06 2 B. The proposed use is in conformance with the goals, policies, programs, and guidelines of the elements of the General Plan; The proposed Zone Change and associated applications are in conformance with the General Plan and all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Section 3. Zone Change and Text Change. The City Council hereby adds Sections 17.22.254 through 17.22.266, inclusive, PDO -13 Arbor Vista Planned Development Overlay, to Chapter 17.22 of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as provided in Attachment A, attached to this Ordinance, incorporated herein as thought set forth in full. The City Council hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City, as described in Section 17.02.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code, by changing the zone for the property located on 73 gross acres at the southeast corner of Via Lobo and Nicolas Road (APNs 919-350-017, 018, 019, 020) from very low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO -13 Arbor Vista Planned Development Overlay). Section 4. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 6. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Ords 14-06 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 14-06 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 12th day of August, 2014, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk Ords 14-06 4 Item No. 17 ORDINANCE NO. 14-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING SECTION 8.28.500 OF CHAPTER 8.28 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STORM WATER AND URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT AND DISCHARGE CONTROLS AND FINDING THAT ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15061(B)(3) OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Section 8.28.500 B of Chapter 8.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: B. Construction Runoff Compliance. All individual grading and building projects with active grading or building permits shall implement erosion and sediment measures, including all other necessary pollution prevention controls, throughout the project, year-round. If the project meets or exceeds one acre of land disturbance, the project must also enroll under, and adhere to all of the requirements of, the latest version of the State Construction General permit (CGP) to ensure that all pollutants throughout and from the site will be either eliminated or reduced to the maximum extent practicable, and will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of water quality objectives as described in the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board Basin Plan. All grading and building activities will be in compliance with the Construction, Grading and Encroachment Ordinance; the Engineering and Construction Manual; other applicable ordinances; Federal, State, and local permits; and other applicable requirements. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Section 8.28.500 C.1.a of Chapter 8.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows: a. All new development projects that create ten thousand square feet of impervious surface; Section 3. Environmental Determination. The proposed amendments to Section 8.28.500 of Chapter 8.28 of the Temecula Municipal Code are determined to be minor clarifications of the Code. Based on this fact, the City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment. Section 4. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or application, and to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared to be severable. Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published as required by law. This Ordinance shall take effect on the 30th day after adoption pursuant to state law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 26th day of August, 2014. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] Ords 14-07 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 14-07 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 12th day of August, 2014, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of August, 2014, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk Ords 14-07 3 Item No. 18 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACTION MINUTES August 12, 2014 City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS CSD CONSENT CALENDAR • Rhonda Reinke addressed the District on Item 15. 14 Action Minutes — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Director Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Director Naggar; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve the action minutes of July 22, 2014. 15 Sponsorship Agreement with Safe Alternatives for Everyone, Inc. (S.A.F.E.) — Approved Staff Recommendation (5-0-0) Director Washington made the motion; it was seconded by Director Naggar; and electronic vote reflected approval by Directors Edwards, Naggar, Roberts, Washington and Comerchero. RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 That the Board of Directors approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Safe Alternatives for Everyone, Inc., in the amount of $10,000 cash and approximately $1,200 of in-kind facility rental fees, so that S.A.F.E. can provide our community with quality services for children, youth, and families who have experienced or are at risk of abuse and violence. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD Action Minutes 081214 1 CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:49 P.M., the Community Services District was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 26, 2014, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, President ATTEST: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC City Clerk [SEAL] CSD Action Minutes 081214 2 Item No. 19 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Agreement with Seaside Ice, LLC dba: Ice -America for the 2014 Holiday Season Outdoor Ice Skating Rink PREPARED BY: Dawn Adamiak, Recreation Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve an Agreement with Seaside Ice, LLC dba: Ice -America, in the amount of $40,000, for the 2014 holiday season outdoor ice skating rink. BACKGROUND: For the past 5 years, the seasonal outdoor ice skating rink has proved to be an excellent addition to the Old Town Temecula Winterfest. Over the past two years Ice -America has seen robust attendance and increased foot traffic enjoying Winterfest in Old Town. The 2014 holiday season outdoor ice rink is planned to be operational from Wednesday, December 10, 2014 through January 4, 2015, seven days a week, including holidays. The rink size will be the same as previous years, 50'X70', and can accommodate approximately 125 skaters per session. The ice rink will again require a road closure at the "Y" on Main Street and Mercedes in front of the Civic Center for about one month's time. Traffic will be routed along Fourth and Third Streets, with access still available to the free parking structure. Proposed hours of operation shall be established between 10:OOam and 10:OOpm Sunday through Thursday with extended hours once again until 11:30pm on Friday and Saturday nights for adults only skating. The adults only skating sessions will have limited music as to not disturb the Old Town residents. A special schedule is proposed for New Year's Eve with operating hours from 10:OOam to 1:OOam on January 1, 2015. The scope of work shall consist of complete turnkey operations; which will include equipment, installation/removal and staffing/operation of the ice skating rink and necessary devices, as a holiday season event for the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: Contract cost in the amount of $40,000 is appropriately budgeted in the current Fiscal Year 2014-15 Community Services Department budget. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR SERVICES BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND ICE -AMERICA OLD TOWN TEMECULA OUTDOOR ICE SKATING RINK THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of August 26, 2014, between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Seaside Ice, LLC dba: Ice -America, (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 26, 2014, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than February 1, 2015, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Contractor shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Contractor shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experiences, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Forty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($40,000.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. c. Contractor will submit invoices three (3) weeks prior to each scheduled payment date as shown in the payment schedule as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule. Payment shall be made according to terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and 1 Schedule. If the City disputes any of the Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. 2 b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Contractor. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Contractor shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 3 2) Automobile Liability: One million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the 4 City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written authorization. Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the General Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by 5 Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Ice -America Attn: Scott Williams 807 Sprucelake Drive Harbor City, CA 90710 14. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 6 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES ICE -AMERICA DISTRICT (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: Jeff Comerchero, TCSD President Scott Williams, Managing Member ATTEST: By: By: Randi Johl-Olson, JD, MMC, City Tom Kearney, Managing Member Clerk/District Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Ice -America Scott Williams 807 Sprucelake Drive Harbor City, CA 90710 (323) 766-9423 swilliams@ice-america.com Acting PM Initials.„!. Date: 8 EXHIBIT A TASKS TO BE PERFORMED/ SCOPE OF WORK 1. General Requirements: To provide for the turnkey equipment delivery/ installation/ removal with turnkey management and operation of an ice-skating rink, as a holiday - season special event for the City of Temecula. To be open to the general public for recreational ice-skating and figure skating exhibitions from December 12, 2014 through January 4, 2014. 2. Equipment: All lighting, sound reinforcement, staging, video or special effects equipment to be provided by Contractor is set forth this exhibit. 3. Personnel: The installation and removal phase of the rink will be led by Tom Kearney and Scott Williams of Ice -America along with a Supervisor from All Access. 4. The On -Site Manager who will coordinate all of the management and the day-to-day operation will be Anthony Kudrna. 5. Subcontractors: All Access Staging & Productions providing design and build of substructure, refrigeration system provided by Aggreko. 6. Schedule: a. Installation Window: December 2 through December 9 b. Open to the Public: December 10, 2014 through January 4, 2015. c. Removal Window: January 5 through January 12, 2015 7. Hours of Operation (subject to change upon mutual consent of City and Contractor) a. Days of Week: Monday through Sunday including holidays b. Hours of Operation shall be established between 10:OOam and 10:OOpm Sunday through Thursday, 10:OOam-11:30pm Friday and Saturday c. Special Hours for New Year's Eve: 10:OOam on December 31, 2014 until 1:OOam on January 1, 2015. d. December 11, 2014, the City of Temecula is hosting a Family Ice Skating Preview from 6:OOpm-7:30pm. A discounted rate of $10/ person for all registered participants through the City of Temecula. Revenue will be collected by City and then distributed to Contractor within two weeks following event. 9 8. Contractor shall provide the following: a. Design and build of substructure for ice rink b. Air-cooled refrigeration system/ pumps/ hoses/ expansion tank and 24 hour on- call service c. Generator for refrigeration system and fuel for generator d. Insulation and vapor barriers (including insulation to level the site) e. Modular railing system with clear Plexiglas facing towards rink with room to display signage upon approval from City of Temecula f. Ice rink maintenance equipment, including a Sport Ice USA 224 or 240 electric resurfacer or a Design Form Model B electric resurfacer used multiple times daily and as needed g. Ice rink freezer system (approx.. 50 X 70) using the Ice -World aluminum tubing system, header and equipment h. Rental ice skates, high quality Roxa brand, approximately 300 pairs of various sizes, sharpened, ready -to -skate, with sharpener and services on site as needed during the run of rink i. Skate change area with benches and rubber floor covering approximately 1,000 square feet J. Skate trailer unit and tent for ticket sales, storing and distribution of skates and office. k. Cash register equipment including POS system with capability to handle cash, credit card and online sales I. All tools, equipment and supplies for set-up, strike and maintenance. All Professional Supervision and General Labor for set-up and strike. m Refrigeration Technician on-call 24 hours during entire term n. General set-up and finish -out meta -frame covering over rink wall header, including Ice -World modular header covers. Clear Plexiglas sides with smooth inside finish or rink perimeter. Turf/carpet to finish rink perimeter/ edge with black skirting covering substructure. o. Sound/ public address announcements and playback of holiday music, to include customized "Rink Station" radio by Ice -America. Rink Manager during entire term; trained and experienced in liability protection Two (2) ADA Compliant Portable Restrooms available during entire term P. q. 10 r. All equipment and amenities installed and ready for test of equipment and facilities, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of soft opening of December 10, 2014. s. Operation of public skate sessions. Hours of operation to be at Contractor's discretion. Proposed times 10:OOam until 10:OOpm approximately. t. Professionally designed and installed liability signage and written waiver release forms for every participant u. Professional Support Services including Consultation for Event Planning and execution by experienced event planning team. 9. Contractor shall provide professional, on-site management (experienced in customer service, liability -prevention and public safety); staffing to include cashier(s), ticket sales, skate rental attendant(s), safety monitor(s) and maintenance personnel to be on-site during entire term of the event, including but not limited to: a. Professional Ice -America uniforms including black pants, blue Ice -America shirts and blue Ice -America jackets b. Public safety announcements are made regularly and holiday music part of "Rink Station" radio experience c. Industry -specific POS system with trained staff d. Ice -America staff member to handle coordination of group sales and special events e. All revenues associated with the ice rink will be retained by Ice -America and its vendors 11 EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Payment Rate Ice -America will provide an outdoor ice rink for the holiday -season beginning December 10, 2014 for preview night through January 4, 2015, for an amount of $40,000. Final payment will be provided upon inspection of area after strike and clean-up. Payment Schedule November 7, 2014 $15,000.00 December 12, 2014 $12,500.00 January 16, 2015 $12,500.00 TOTAL $40,000.00 12 Item No. 20 COUNCIL BUSINESS Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager Mr - CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Old Town Local Review Board Appointments PREPARED BY: Shelley Pollak, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two applicants to serve full three-year terms on the Old Town Local Review Board through June 15, 2017. BACKGROUND: The terms of Committee Members Peg Moore and Gary Watts expired on June 15, 2014. The City Clerk's office has followed the Council's established procedure for filling Committee vacancies by advertising the openings in the local newspaper. Notices were also posted at various locations within the City and on the City's web page. When the deadline was reached for accepting applications, the applications were forwarded to the committee comprised of Mayor Edwards and Council Member Washington for review and recommendation. Fifteen applications were received for the two vacancies. Both Mayor Edwards and Council Member Washington have recommended the re -appointments of Committee Members Peg Moore and Gary Watts to serve full three-year terms through June 15, 2017. All applicants are registered voters. Although not a requirement of this committee, all applicants are residents of the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 21 Supplemental Material for Item No. 21 (Planning Commission Appointment) ` �' City of Temecula-�3- tal'12: St RCVD '� /1,W ,T, 41000 Main Street Commission Appointment Temecula, CA 92590 1989 ;_ www.cityoftemecule.org App//cation (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration; you must currently be a resident of the • •• City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the,City Limits of the City of Temecula • • Please Check One: X Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 4.5 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes NAME: Julian Alexander OCCUPATION: Lead Systems Analyst/Eng Mgr University Cooperatives ADDRESS: 11111111.111111111111111.111.1. DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: L3 Communications EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 5957 Landau Court, Carlsbad CA E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: eacceiaureata Degree in Electrical Engineering,Cal State Long Beach Masters Degree in Business Administration,Rochester institute of Technology List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: N/A List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): NIA State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) I hope to help Temecula shape and achieve its vision for tha future by supporting and enabling competitive,sustainable growth of government,businesses and residents within a technology based global society. Resume attached(over 15yrs.techibusiness/gov), I understand that any or alt information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: Date: .2,3 --Ale� 2 / � Y Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE 23-Moy-2414 Commission Appointment Applicotion, City of Temeculo Julian Alexander °' Mr - —� M 1/' .•'Yt.•. ;OH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ' =i�tel/f'i" - Security Clearance:Active TS/SCI Gvrt enteni,SYU n OrineeM"q $wars,Maooprmrns Education: MgA, Rochester institute of Technology(MT) BSEE,California State University Long Beach(CSULB) Business Management: Manager of university cooperatives in engineering, R&D and business Team leadership& business strategy analysis New business development Technology research management&commercialization International Business(Czech Republic, Boeing 7g7, Foreign Military Sales) Corporate accounting,finance(Valuation, NPV,CAPM,WACC,CF)and applied statistics International finance analysis(FOREX, Forwards) Market research and feasibility analysis Team building/management,leadership, performance review&evaluation System Development and Analysis: Satellite remote sensing and communication system development Manned aircraft communication, navigation and identification (CNi)systems engineering Unmanned Air Vehicle(UAV)avionics and communication systems integration Optical communication systems development Systems engineering integration and test(SETT) Architecture definition Process development Project planning, resource allocation, risk management US Government Regulatory Agency,GS-13: Department of Defense(DoD), Defense Threat Reduction Agency(DTRA/DTSA) International Traffic in Arms Regulation (ITAR) Space Technology Analyst, Monitor and Advisor Project Experience: Spacecraft: Chandra(AXAF), SiR-C, Ku SAICOM, UHF SATCOM,INMARSAT,AFSCN,Sea Launch, International Launch Services(I S),Thuraya,TDRSS, Space Shuttle, Iridium, GPS,national systems Aircraft: goeing 787, F-3S Joint Strike Fighter(JSF), F-22 Fighter, Global Hawk, Eurohawk JAlexander Resume Page [ .t of 4 23-Moy-2014 Commission Appointment Application, City of Temecula EXPERIENCE TIMELINE DETAIL$ Mav/2009—present L-3 Communication Systems,(760)431-6800 5957 Landau Ct.,Carlsbad,CA 9208 Title:Systems Engineering Lead,Manager of University Cooperatives • Technical director& functional manager of systems engineering project team. • Defining and directing definition of new architectures(including DODAF),functional and performance requirement analysis/allocation/management,definition of qualification testing objectives and procedures,risk management, process improvements,QA and CM inputs. • Responsible for integrating&reviewing technical content of documentation(i.e.ICD, System specs,etc.) and managing design team inputs through development lifecycle and milestones. • Responsible for specialized system analysis such as mechanical cantilever resonance for specifying system vibration requirements,analysis of electromagnetics using theoretical models to approximate magnetic circuit performance,applied statistics for analysis of random vibration anomalies discovered in the performance of optical devices, defining models of research process • Responsible for finding innovative ways to establish mutually beneficial cooperatives with universities in the area of R&D, engineering, manufacturing and business. Sept/2006—Apr(2009 Boeing Commercial Airplanes, (425)342-2121 BOE//VC 3003 W Casino Rd,Everett,WA 98204 Title:Satellite Communication System(SATCOM)System Manager, System Design&Analysis Engineer • SATCOM Subject Matter Expert(SME) and SATCOM equipment manager for 7g7 commercial aircraft during development and l&T. Successfully completed Systems Engineering Integration and Testing(SLIT)of iNMARSAT SATCOM functions in an international business environment. • RF testing/analysis of SATCOM with new Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastic(CFRP)fuselage. • Developed strategies and technical analysis for integration of INMARSAT Swift Broad Band (SBg). • Subject matter expert at antenna supplier technical design reviews and selection process. Mar/2001—Aug/2006 Northrop Grumman, (310)812-4321 NORTN'ROP GRNMM.4AI 1 Space Park Dr.,Redondo Beach,CA 90278 Title:Communication Systems Engineer/Lead • Systems engineering avionics team lead for the EuroHawk UAV during architecture definition and proposal development. This technical role required coordination with the German Ministry of Defense (GeMOD)in order to integrate and interface German sensors systems into the baseline US Air Force Global Hawk air and ground systems. • Strategized UAV flight plan/waypoint options optimizing Ku SATCOM footprint coverage. • Successfully managed EuroHawk export challenges resulting from a Foreign Military Sale(FMS) of US Air Force systems and export restricted hardware. • Systems engineering lead for the UHF SATCOM function used on the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)CNI subsystem (Comm/Nav/ID). This role required integration of existing UHF SATCOM waveforms into the architecture of newly developed software defined radios, and functional requirement definition/analysis driven by customer level CONOPS. • Extensive analysis of communication system hardware performance requirements that interfaced with other CNI functions such as ILS,TACAN,IFF,UHF/VHF LOS, Link-16,etc. JAlexander Resume Page 12 of 4 23-May-2014 Commission Appointment Application, City of Temecula Dec/1999—Mar/2001 US Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency,(703)767-5945 MpC.• . 8725 JOHN 1 KINGMAN RD STOP 6201, FORT BELVOIR,VA 22060-6201 '�t Title:GS-13, Satellite Engineer • Satellite technology analyst for the US DoD's Defense Threat Reduction Agency(DTRA). • Space technology monitor assessing compliance of space programs with ITAR regulations. • Satellite and launch vehicle subject matter expert representing DTRA at launch campaigns and US interagency working groups. These working groups included participants from many/all stakeholder agencies. Meetings were held at TS-SCI levels, and included technical review of all military,commercial and academic space technologies for risk to national security. On-site support of payload/launch vehicle integration and launch campaigns such as Sea Launch. Feb/1995—Dec/1999 TRW Space&Electronics,(310)812-4321 ;,11111�: 1 Space Park Dr.,Redondo Beach,CA 90278 Title:Spacecraft Payload Systems Engineer for the Systems Engineering &Test Center(SEITC) • Extensive work developing multiple variations of SATCOM link analysis tools using excel and other applications. These tools were used to develop and analyze end-to-end satellite communication systems during proposal and design efforts. This included analysis and allocation of technical RF&digital performance requirements to subsystem development teams and/or commercial component suppliers. Link analyses included partitioning of link performance parameters distributed across the system architecture(i.e. Noise Figure,gain stability/variation,etc.),analysis and selection of digital encoding algorithms(information theory), modem performance modeling of various modulation types and random process effects on bit error rates, implementation of numerical atmospheric models for spectral efficiency analysis,orbital mechanics as applied to tracking and non-tracking systems(EIRP,footprint,etc), RF cosite mitigation analysis(antenna positioning, beam forming,frequency diversity,TDMA, CDMA,etc.)and tactics for communication and/or transmission security(COMSEC,TRANSEC). • System level design and simulation of digital communication architectures using Signal Processing Workstation(SPW)which included modeling m-ary modulation types with channel noise for optimizing decision statistics and digital performance at the receiver. • Responsible systems engineer(RSE) during final satellite integration, environmental testing and performance verification. My ultimate responsibility was successful sell-off of front-end RF payload performance. • Created RF performance models of in-orbit spacecraft payloads using a high level programming language and used as tools within satellite ground stations in order to predict and assess performance of satellite RF payloads during in-orbit operations. • As part of a system operations team,developed launch,deployment and in-orbit operation sequences/scripts for the Advanced X-Ray Astrophysics Facility(AXAF)spacecraft which is currently known as the Chandra X-Ray observatory. JAlexander Resume Page 1 3 of 4 23-Moy-2014 Commission Appointment Appileotion,City of Temeculo EDUCATION MBA, Rochester Institute of Technology(RIT), Rochester, NY Feb 2013 BSEE,Long Beach State University,Long Beach CA 1993 Graduate Coursework, USC,Los Angeles CA 199S-1997 OTHER RELATED EXPERIENCE NASA-Jet Propulsion Laboratories(JPL),Pasadena CA Title:Academic Part Time(APT) • Supported Systems Engineering team in the analysis and development of a shuttle based,3-band Synthetic Aperture RADAR(Spaceborne imaging Radar C,a.k.a."SIR-C")used for earth science City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte CA Title: Research Assistant(Academic Part Time) • Applied Electrical Engineering theory&technology towards research of cancer causes • Researched incidence of childhood leukemia as correlated to 60Hz EM radiation • Applied Electrical Engineering theory&technology towards research of cancer treatment • Analysis and implementation of cancer treatment(Hyperthermia)using microwave radiation and nuclear radiation • Analysis and implementation of cancer treatment using DC potentials California State University,Long Beach CA Title:Teaching Assistant(TA),Space Technology&Chemistry • Solar Power design for satellite project proposal and solar power car. Analyzed array design and charging performance for battery system. Developed a basic energy budget/model that incorporated effects of environmental energy parameters such as regenerative braking,wind resistance,position of sun,spectral content of radiation,etc. • Telemetry subsystems design for solar power car Rochester Institute of Technology,MBA program Title: MBA Business Capstone Consulting Lead • Market research and feasibility analysis of online data visualization service/product for the Center for Governmental Research organization(CGR). Duties included project management and team leadership. • Technology Management&Product Commercialization • international Business&Finance STEM education activities: • Classroom STEM speaker: Corporate sponsored volunteer activities bringing STEM demonstrations into the classroom (Grades K-12) • College/University Teaching Assistant(TA)and tutor:Space Technology,Inorganic Chemistry, advanced mathematics(adult education) • Judge at San Diego Science& Engineering Fair JAlexander Resume Page 1 4 of 4 City of Temecula 06-11- 14 A08:56 RCv-) _��„.44.�il 41000eculaMainCA Street92590 Commission Appointment Tem , www.cityoftemecula.org Application (951) 694-6444 ___* IVEG For proper consideration, you must currently be a resident of the UN 1 1 2014 City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of th• e City of Temecula . en'Y CLEiRtlritf• wtP1. Please Check One: X Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 2 . 5 Are you a City Registered Voter? `/ES NAME: 1321 ANI AV E-A OCCUPATION: FOLICE OE.T t-riVC ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: 111.11111.111.1111_ EVENING PHONEMIIMMIL EMPLOYER NAME: .5AN p 1E60 PowCE tE Pl4/ TM ENT EMPLOYER ADDRESS: I'1oi 8Q�i41v4y, SANT 41e.66, CA E-MAIL 92_101 Educational Background/Degrees: AA u8 EIZA ikT.S .s4N/ 1E60 C.on+M ,ry Coca 46E,, 2ooq AS gDMINtSTATIoN aF TusriCEr sp MM6 Cowvrry CoLLEr 8A Pul3Uc AtInirNrsri2ATIoN�SAN 4IE60 -anrrE lwrvAE51 2011 /44451. 4a of PdaLlc AomINISTn1.ATIpNr4ASu)f!Natt. EARN FA 1.1- 2014-1) List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: NONE. THIS 15 THE Fl r2sr COMMISSION IN M4 LIFE 'THAT f AM %SEEKIN e To SERV£. List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): THE NATIONAL LhTINp POLICE oFFlcfQs ASSoc4 '-r,o4 ME SAN f,1660 POs-ICE or-Fief-42.s AcSOca -rsoM TME CRt-ifoRmA ' C-onC. oFFrCEkS' ASSocIAT7arJ State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) Pi.4-AsE (ZEFER -fp ATTAcz-4Ep 1~E-rrE2. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: Date: !o `j 0 - /`l Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE ,�r Brian Avera June 10, 2014 Dear Honorable Members of the Temecula City Council, My name is Brian Avera and I wanted to briefly tell you about myself as well as identify the reasons why I want to serve the citizens of our community as a planning commissioner. I was born in Whittier, CA but I was raised in Hesperia, CA throughout all of my years of schooling. To be completely honest, my first memories of Temecula go back to when I was on the Hesperia High School wrestling team. I knew then that if I were going to step on the wrestling mat with a wrestler from Temecula that I was going to have my work cut out for me. Now as an adult, I realize the kids I stepped on the mat with were great because they were a direct reflection of their family's superior work ethic and high moral standards, which I now know to be common in this great city today. After graduation I served as a US Marine for five years. During my enlistment I deployed to several foreign countries to include Iraq. I was honorably discharged from the Marine Corps and attained the rank of Staff Sergeant. After leaving the Marine Corps I decided that I still wanted a job that would allow me to serve others. In October of 2006, I was hired as a police officer by the San Diego Police Department. After becoming comfortable with my responsibilities as a police officer I decided to go back to school. My academic journey has led me to earn two associate degrees and Bachelor's Degree in Public Administration. Currently, I have only three classes to complete to earn my Master's Degree in Public Administration at San Diego State University. After earning this degree my goal is to earn a Master's of Business Administration degree beginning likely in 2015. I believe that my working in government through protecting the citizens of America's 8th largest city combined with formal study of government has prepared me to serve this Citizens of Temecula as a planning commissioner. My wife Hillary has just accepted a job working at a local private college here in Temecula where she will be teaching her students the skills they will need to seek a profession in the medical field. I mention my wife and her career because I think it's important that the Council know that we are planning on raising our future children in this community. I know this great community will provide our children with a good moral foundation that will allow them to become good productive members of society that my wife and I will be proud of one day. Yesterday evening as I was driving northbound on Interstate 15 coming home from work I again noticed our City's sign that identified our motto: "Old Traditions and New Opportunities." An overwhelming feeling of clarity came over me. I realized then that seeking this position is exactly what I am supposed to doing with my life at this very moment. Without any reservations, I know that I want to be a part of the planning process that ensures our community maintains our old traditions that will provide new opportunities for our children for many generations to come. Very Respectfully. Brian Avera June 9,2014 To Whom It May Concern, I am writing this letter in recommendation of Mr. Brian Avera as he seeks a position on the Temecula Planning Commission. I have known Brian for approximately four years as we are both members of the San Diego Police Department. I have served as Brian's commanding officer while he was a patrol officer and then again,after his promotion to detective. I can't speak highly enough about Brian and his excellent work ethic and professional demeanor. He is well spoken and his written work is far above standard for our profession. I have had many conversations with Brian over the years and I know he is currently pursuing his Master's Degree in Public Administration at San Diego State University. He completed his under graduate work while he was working under my command. His work product never suffered due to his studies and this is a testament to his professionalism,work ethic and multi tasking abilities. I have found Brian to be very personable,driven,goal oriented and extremely well organized. He is very respectful and an excellent communicator. Brian is a good team member who understands his role in the success of the team. I am always very impressed when a member of the community steps up and volunteers to take part in endeavors such as your Planning Commission. In this day and age of busy work and home schedules with all of the pressures that come with them,it is reassuring to know we have civic minded volunteers willing to donate their time to make their community a nicer,safer place to live,work and play. l don't believe you will find a better person than Brian Avera to add to your team. I know you will be as Impressed as I am with Brian once you have the opportunity to work around him. Please feel free to contact me with any questions about this recommendation or my experience with Brian Avera. Sincerely, Todd Jarvis Assistant Chief of Police,San Diego Police Department June 4, 2014, To Whom It May Concern: My name is Misty Cedrun and I am a lieutenant with the San Diego Police Department. I have had the distinct pleasure of knowing Brian Avera for the past eight years. I was his immediate supervisor when I was a patrol Sergeant and Brian was an officer on my squad. I watched a young man develop and hone his police craft in every facet. He surpassed every one of my expectations in addition to excelling far beyond the Department's performance evaluations. Brian's work ethic,professionalism, and intelligence made him stand out immediately. I was struck by his tenacity and dedication to fulfilling any and every goal he set for himself. for example, Brian shared his educational goal with me, not to obtain any special favor,but to request a flexible work schedule for one day a week. I was very impressed with Brian's ambition and to be honest,a bit concerned he would not be able to complete his aggressive school schedule. I have learned never to doubt Brian because he not only completed his academic goals,but he raised the bar again and is now pursuing his Master's Degree in Public Administration. Brian's time management skills and ability to juggle personal and professional demands are impressive! I have been coaching and mentoring Brian, despite the fact we no longer work together. I am so proud and pleased to see Brian reached another goal,his recent promotion to the rank of Police Detective.As a Detective Brian has worked at our Department's Vice Unit,Narcotics Unit,and now our Gang Unit,so he will be able to provide planning recommendations that will be designed to reduce crime in the City of Temecula. As mentioned earlier, I never doubted Brian's ability for promotion,and I am thankful the San Diego Police Department has recognized Brian's talent and commitment to duty. On a personal note, Brian is stable,happily married,and has strong family values. As a prior United States Marine, Brian is patriotic,full of passion and integrity, and will never disappoint or let someone down. He can lead or follow and does not put his pride before the mission,agenda,or the greater good. I strongly encourage your City Council to consider Brian for this planning commission. He would not be a disappointment. I relish the possibility of some day working with Brian again. Perhaps,at the rate he is progressing and his leadership abilities, I will be working for him! Sincerely, Misty Cedrun, Lieutenant San Diego Police Department Northern Division JACK MC R RY i ' June06, 2t14 To Whom it May Concern, I have known Brian Avera for one year while serving as his instructor at San Diego State University. While teaching a Seminar on Public Administration at SDSU I have tauIht Brian about the inner workings of running a municipal level government that was based on my yea of service as a previous Personnel Director and City Manager for the City of San Diego!. Much •1 our discussions during this course centered on the implementation of Proposition 13, the financing of infrastructure,the ending of redevelopment in California, and the fundamentals o real estate and these topics are all a matter of concern for a citizen serving on a planning commission. I further instructed Brian in his Public Sector Negotiations course this last semester, and although this course may not be completely relevant to serving on a planning commission, I know it will come to serve him as he later pursues a career in politics.I During this time I have come to know that Brian has been pursuing his Master's De ree in Public Administration while maintaining a demanding work schedule as a San Diego Police Detective. I know that Brian's pursuit of attaining a higher level of education combined with this real world experience of serving the citizens of California's second largest city has fashio d his mind to think in a critical Iong-term perspective, which is absolutely imperative tb anyone serving on this type of commission. Another good quality of Brian is that he is never afraid o . challenge. This has become evident in this academic program because he has chose to write a thesis,which is a challenge that is attempted by approximately only 5% of students in his program. During the time that I have known Brian he has distinctly set himself apart from his fellow graduate students by consistently offering pro-business and fiscally conservative viewpoints on all matters concerning our local,state,and federal government. I think Brian's mindset will come to match the mindset of the community that he is seeking to serve.! During this time I have come to know Brian not only as a student but also on a more personal level. Just like !, Brian served in our nation's premiere leadership organization as a United States Marine. I know the principles of personal responsibility that are taught on day(one whil• being fashioned into a Marine have been permanently engrained in Brian. I know Brian's service to others before himself is a principle he learned in the United States Marine Corps an I would be willing to bet this is precisely the reason he is pursuing this position. As a previous City Manager and a CEO of several private companies in my lifetime have co e to know many people working in the public and the private sector. With that backgrIund I ha full faith in Brian's character, knowledge,and most importantly his abilities to serve the Citize s of Temecula in a responsible manner. School of Public Aft 1r SAN DIEGO STATE College of Professional Studied and Fine Arta UtslIVERSITY San Diego Slate thiivenity 5500 Cempenile Drive San Diego G 92132.4505 Tel:619.994.6224 Fax:679.594 1165 (y limning Crivslnnt Jwtice Adminyn+ttaa Pwblic Administradon June 10, 2014 Honorable Mayor Edwards end City Councilmembers City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92580 RE: Brian Avera's Applicetion to the City of Temecula Planning Commission Dear Honorable Mayor and City Councilrrlembers: It is en honor to recommend Mr. Brien Avera for the City of Temecula's Planning Commission. Mr. Avera served our country in the US Marine Corps from 2001-2008 where he was ultimately promoted to the rank of Staff Sergeant. Following his service as a Marine, Mr. Avers began his distinguished career at the San Diego Police Department where he currently serves as e Detective. During his seven years of service as a law enforcement officer, Mr. Avera has worked with departmental and conTnunity leaders end refined the very skills you are seeking in a commissioner. Mr. Avera hes exceptional communication skills and a demonstreted ability to build rapport with others - even those with consistently dissenting opinions. I have had the pleasure of knowing Mr. Avers during the pest two years as a greduate student in San Diego State University's Masters of Public Administration program. Mr. Avers demonstrates extreordinary passion for public service and unmatched ability to seek new solutions to address long- stending challenges in municipal government. Mr. Avera is knowledgeeble of land use policies and general challenges that municipal governments are facing in 2014. He is passionate about engaging citizens in the lend use decisions that will continue to shape the future of Temecula Mr Avera is one of the strongest MPA students I have met in my 13 years of teaching at two univer-sities and dedicated public servants I've known during my 20 yeas of service in government Thank you for your time and consideretion. Very respectfully, 4/' 'AtAnoik Patricia A. Frosio Lecturer, School of Public Affairs San Diego State University 1t46 CALSWRNIA S'hATII F11i1VP.*SMTY• 9At11RSPfaLD• CHANNEL*LAMA•CIRCO•oununGuez nuts• 'VAST OM •memo•FULL NKIN •ft4/AfVO DT•WM;SUCH•LHE ANG1a.ES MA1QTIM8 ACAHEHY•NONTPiSY HAY•MOM HRitEl •POMONA•sAcmeito •SAN URN ARAM•SAN EAEM•SAN fiUNCESCH•los R•SAN LU13 Q515PQ•SAN.MARCOS.%)NOIVA•STAt4{E.ADS Ke11tvltivIM MAY 22 2014 a 41_ " City of Temecula MTV Cttli.Sta touts:. . . Te41000 Commission Appointment Or www.crtyofternecula.org Ap lication ••. (951) 694-6444 p For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula P/ease Check One: / Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 3 Are you a City Registered Voter?ye S NAME: C,111-;,S7-i&n/ /-3a.r re-TT OCCUPATION: C/vr / c,t/ i n/cGri.v� Co vSuti wv" ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: 1111.1111111111.11L (7, EVENING PHONE: 111111.11. EMPLOYER NAME: a,<Te C-A,s EMPLOYER ADDRESS: Y/700 Xvx 57 5re C "vr-rieT&E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: C pp p rfrCr-elh,cS CCAPPre" r-,,vJ) . ecrT/ri-e d 1v7-ode5k rIfivi c ioMs a-A/5rrvTo r List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 1-d b/ T A r - l f ur��,v�-r y (Des/,y,N Co r►rr ;-r-r-ee-),1 yr-i At/Gl-C recTor of ti-fro-STrvcTor-.57CO/•,,~,vNiTy - 3 yr-.5 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations,lservice clubs, etc.): 4crr�d eS k us-e rs &roup �NTer,va.7 io /« l i(AU61) I ember- DT M vi7,ple oA/1, Ne 91-ovPs —£Av�-1,✓�e���e ol- 50-c-r-u/are State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) .0 heoVG ,�►,GtR/L, S/ears oe�ppr-2, e_ rN C , ,✓j , J f-,A�� ,d T�'aysPorTor '/ov des,S.v. would love -r° he 4-c/d,'Ti o,v I S ��STs a�-� ���-e d . I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: A0,•,,o_yv-rt Date: S. 2.l • jy Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE C-I CADTECHS Christian Barrett: Christian has over 20 years of experience in the AEC industry, 14 years of which using Autodesk products. Over the last 8 years he's focused on assisting companies with implementing Autodesk AutoCAD CMI 3D and other Autodesk Infrastructure applications. His focus has been not only on the software's commands and functions, but the training and management of the software and its end users. Christian has performed long-term AutoCAD Civil 3D and Infrastructure Design Suite implementations consisting of, but not limited to, 6 months, 9 months, 19 months & 32 months in duration. These implementations were primarily on site most weekdays, and were supported remotely other days, including nights, weekends and holidays. Solutions also included assessment of CAD staff, training CAD Management and IT staff, and continued support post-implementation. Christian has provided training to over 1,000 users, most of which has been customized to the clients' unique CAD user profiles. He has a knack for finding out what you/your team needs, how that unmet need affects your daily operations, and then customizing a class and/or content to best meet it. Christian also has a passion for online training, and all the flexible options and value that it brings (both recorded and live) to the busy CAD user. Christian has assisted other organizations in developing their own online training programs. Best known accolades are: creator and author of Autodesk Users Group International (AUGI) Hotnews column "The Civil Side," author in AEC/Edge magazine, Civil Engineering forum moderator, and AutoCAD CMI 3D Community Director for AUGI. • Member of Autodesk's Premium Support Technical Advisory Board • Member of Autodesk's Developer Network • Member of Autodesk's Affiliate Program Cadtechs www.cadtechs.biz : Established in 2008 with a focus on Autodesk AutoCAD Civil 3D implementations and training services, Cadtechs offers all forms of Autodesk products training, with an emphasis on workflow enhancement via online training and support options. Cadtechs is an authorized reseller for the following manufacturers: Autodesk, KnowledgeSmart, Bluebeam, Steltman, Retrieve Technologies, and has a teaming agreement with Kelar Pacific, LLC. References: Max Bellato:Albert A. Webb Associates, Riverside, CA Brian Chapman: SHG, Inc., Las Vegas, NV Brad Knepp: SB&O, Temecula, CA • City of Temecula g �I/.�.�� 41000 Main Street �=1 �y,! Temecula,CA 92590 Commission Appointment www.cityotternecuia org Application (951) 694-64.44 For'proper consideration;you must currently be a resident of then AECEIVict City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits Of the City of Temecula •- • • . �'N 0 4 2914 • • ,4;11 V mums OLPT-. Please Check One: / Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 2'i Are you a City Registered Voter? `(E, NAME: 5rx)A0 nT4.&4 - OCCUPATION: El i.G _ ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: U(u crit EMPLOYER ADDRESS: - E-MAIL - Educational Background/Degrees: "1.711 rch • 8.g• fN � E !. •/k3oGAre t� 16AlFE ( .•`3•) �WSi?J6106 Ct N►A�-r rim / tr r t, � • t�.s. i>V erg!5rr, Tu .. E, ,, . CEler LAC•Ca,4 sates c�. - • t?1�D .tN cAto s Yt�ttu�s©pH y spit.ceo ,11r 1 wE. i" A+0o OsC+ List any uity or ounty Bo ommittee or Commission on w ich you have served and the year(s) of Com. service: .4-)09-4450 Fog- CoOArvy of sow, lie92,Q,442.13(09 r.2.13( O -'(RA 1ATta' _ s. •C�+.�sr• . it.) the VowsJT - IAA Alps o Fcr oD 077124X.- 0106i) c CE UnA4fut TQ CEV) 143/..64.-)0 EM►tiziep— !v(Jd, RA List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): C US60 To INS /��soC.IATu)&) S or e,t v1 c £ -r „�swtlt CAT/ • Rtv��si wVR.t-O APPA 42- 'gc�5i 5S UG�N�6 FoxEft{(f ix.SG S6i2tie6 State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of pa er if necessary. Letters of recommendation and;'or references are encouraged.) P- 'COLI 1-1"5T x -- a, crrtZ.�s,c.) of U • L1e+5D HrYP- PvewC,. S '2JtcF . imus To P e tc pb( itis Foie- v, a ous I ee mat oolvte.or. AIBL6 lb 'CTectSto>v ert 4.t a Fog_ via,IR.tou.s ca/v.44,ms of -64" vas&a foe. Se. cL- ek. 413 #040 I*Prie,v6*iEC t tA)tT#`trj C.ckuO.0Mil 7r;C's. I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified.I consent to the release of this information for public Information purposes. Signature: ...A... �.•.: .,,.. .:. _ '' Date: ,j! ici Please mail or return to: ity of Temecula, City Clerk's Office `! 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE �, {1.11f �' City of Temecula fi r...410, �,'a 41000 Main street ' Temecula,CA 92590 Commission Appointment 1984__...„; www.cltydftemecula.org Application (951)694-6444 For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the RECEIVED City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the NAY 28 2014 City of Temecula Gorr cl.eRlCS OLP-`. Please Chick one: _ X Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 24 yrs Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes NAME: R. Chris Branuelas OCCUPATION: Retired Sheriffs Lieutenant ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: Same EMPLOYER NAME: (Retired) Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department EMPLOYER ADDRESS:4700 Ramona Blvd., Monterey Park 91574 E_mAILIMIIMIll Educational Background/Degrees: Masters of Arts - Education, Touro University, New York List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: I served as the liaison lieutenant to the city of San Dimas between 2001 and 2005. I have served on various county and state committees during the past 25 years relating to various aspects of public safety. List eny organizations to which you belong (professionel, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): Sheriffs Relief Association and Professional Peace Officer's Association State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach e separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) Retirement allows me the time to apply to my community's concerns. My experience with local government at various levels and public safety give me valuable and contemporary insight into organizational management and leadership. I am familiar with large scale building projects and oversaw mufti-miltion dollar budgets. I underatand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. 1 consent to the release of this information for public Information purposes. 4 / Signature:_ A � D May 23, 2014 ate: Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE R. Chris Branuelas May 24, 2014 City of Temecula City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula,California 92590 Thank you for the opportunity to apply for membership in the city's planning commission. I have over thirty years of law enforcement experience with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and retired 2013. My background includes training and certifications in emergency and disaster planning, firearms and tactics training, information management, and narcotics enforcement. I have served on multiple city,state,and federal commissions.During my career,the latter half of which I worked as a supervisor and manager,I supervised large operational budgets, have been involved in capitol building projects and grants,and supervised the downtown Los Angeles Court Operations. I recently led a team in the development of computer databases for the Sheriff's Department's use in tracking critical information,such as uses of force,complaints,and pursuits. In 2013, I received a Los Angeles County award for cost savings in this effort. I have asked Chief Warren Asmus to send you a letter of recommendation directly and would be happy to provide additional information as needed. I have been a Temecula resident for decades. My wife and I raised our two children in what began as a small town. Unfortunately, my career and commute made it previously difficult to become more involved in our community. My retirement now makes it possible to serve and hopefully I can bring something useful to your efforts in managing our city. Most cordially, zyln Chris Branuelas J_` City of Temecula ...- __ RECEIVED 4Comm-'�f, 4t000 Main Street ission Appointment ' (� 1 (�ff))', Temecula,GA 82590 �UN 1 ?U 17 ,KwN,.rityoftemecu .or9 Application — (95f)694 . CITV !-r. i15 p\r-44;iiiiaidsration you must"currrentiybe a resident:of the - '- •,Clty of,Temet ala`aed:a RegLstered Voter*Ithin•theCity Limits of the,O Pisa..Chock wVl Planning _„_ Community Services Public Traffic Safety 061 0—i Q f {)3 '2 Q R C Y 0Ow Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident /7 Are you a City Registered Voter? 'A'S I NAME:/J/i h(7hr(3 fire') OCCUPATION: " .. "ii,) ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:11.111111111_EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME:JISAIA.S'lnc. EMPLOYER ADORE 9i5tolatfEd : , , •.411VIM R�iIes111LSC!1 _ _ Educational Background/Degrees: /JAI. IIbelA/5,/dies Q5' to rnf f- Pohl/piaM J List any City or County Board,Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: Ong v0iLt eer pn6/.17 cis - Se( (itrrtchetL.please List any organizations to which you belong(professional,technical,volunteer groups,non-profit organizations,service cubs,etc.): please see d:in'/ bs1 pg,I. State why you wish to serve or this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation andfor references are encouraged.) L etft7s aiitereAa I understand that any or au Information on this form may be verified-I consent to the release of this information for public Information purposes. SIgneturel f1rZeiit e /--- Date:dant 9i d()/4 Please mall or return to:City of Temecula.City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE June 9,2014 Planning Commission Applicant;City of Temecula Resident of the City of Temecula since 1997,(17 years) And a current registered voter DEBORAH CHRISTENSEN Real Estate Appraiser Trainee! Owner or Originals by Deborah"ewelry SELF EMPLOYED-Currently not working EDUCATION: • AA LIBERAL ARTS-CRAFTON HILLS COLLEGE YUCAIPA 1984 • BS URBAN®IONAL PLANNING-CAL POLY POMONA 1991 • DRE CA Real Estate Salesperson License 2002 • BREA CA Real Estate Appraiser license 2006 My experience and background encompass over 35 years in the real estate arena. I started my journey when I was in grade school_ My first job was surveying land with my father who was a Civil Engineer. High school studies were geared towards mathematics and science. I interned for a year while in college designing and researching subdivisions for a private firm prior to receiving my degree in Urban and Regional Planning with an emphasis on architecture and landscape design. After graduation, I worked for 2 years as an Environmental Planner detailing the effects of specific projects on employment and housing in communities. It was in 1993 when US Air Force transferred us to New Jersey.Since returning to Temecula in 1997,I have been very active in the community_ CITY/COUNTY BOARDS OR COMMITTEES: NONE at this level,however; currently Vice President on the Crowne Hill Association Board of Directors. Capacity since June 2012, and at application time,currently running as incumbent. Crowne Hill Association Committee member on the Landscape (9 yrs) , Enforcement (5 yrs), and Architecture Review(5 yrs)committees. l have attended every planned Board meeting over the last 2 years. I have put in overtime outside the monthly meetings where necessary to perform the duties as Vice President. I am currently serving as the project manager for the redesign of Regents Hill Park. All the improvements being made to our community's open space is being done within the approved budget and is not changing our monthly dues. Deborah Christensen Planning Commission applicant 2014 Page 1 of 2 ORGANIZATION AFFILIATIONS: ✓ Make-a- Wish: Wish Fairy and Fundraiser Volunteer with the Orange County Inland Empire chapter from 2009-2014 ✓ Habitat for Humanity Inland Empire: Fundraising Event Volunteer and Field Member, since 2011 ✓ Culinary Instructor Assistant: Martha Culbertson with Mt San Jacinto Community College, since 2010 ✓ Crowne Hill Association: Landscape, Enforcement, Architecture Committee member, since 2005 ✓ Crowne Hill Association: Board of Directors member since 2012 ✓ Heart Lutheran Church Temecula/Sun City: Communion bread baker/provider, outreach coordinator Samaritans Purse-Operation Christmas Child Shoe Boxes COMMISSION STATEMENT OF INTEREST: My commitment to improving and maintaining the value of my home,and those in my community is what motivates me to pursue a position on the planning commission. 'It is through a diverse economic base and a continued progression of revenues along with smart population growth management that is what I feel will help maintain the viability of the city of Temecula: In the early 2000's, I applied for this position and personally met with Jeff Comechero and Mike Naggar. I feel that it has taken the last 14 years as a resident of Temecula and an active member of my Association that contributes to my qualifications and experience. I personally feel that my knowledge, experience,background, and personal commitment to being an honest and respectable person will make me a valuable asset on the City of Temecula Planning Commission. 1 thank you for your consideration. REFERENCES AND RECCOMMENDATIONS: • Audrey Cilurzo: (sec attached recommendation) • Martha Culbertson:(see attached recommendation) • Norma Zermeno:(see attached recommendation) • Jim Jolliff:Law enforcement. Personal reference over 30 years • Knowelle Decker.Administration-West Covina School District:Personal reference over 30 years Deborah Christensen Planning Commission applicant 2014 Page 2 of 2 ! Vincenzo and Atxr Cifurzo 1, June 4, 2014 City of Temecula Recommendation for Deborah Christensen Applicant for Planning Commission Deborah Christensen has been a friend and associate on committees for several years. She is a self starter and a leader. Deborah is excellent at problem solving. She is creative and enjoys the challenge of creating and planning new projects. Deborah has a very strong work ethic. She works well with others in group situations,either as a member of a committee or a team leader. 1 believe Deborah has the many qualifications needed to seek the position on the City of Temecula Planning Commission. Thank You Audrey Cilurzo Former winery/vineyard Owner June 4, 2014 City of Temecula Recommendation for Deborah Christensen Applicant for City Planning Commission Deborah Christensen has been a friend and associate of mine for five years. She has been assisting me in teaching classes for Mount San Jacinto College for that time. I find her to be completely reliable and honest in everything she does. She has the ability to develop a program and strategically bring the plan to completion. She recently designed a survey sheet to use in my classes. It is current, to the point and very effective in helping to design future programs. Deborah is very adept at offering solutions for problems and very creative in helping to plan curriculums for future classes. She has a very strong work ethic and her assistance has contributed enormously to our award winning classes. I believe that all the qualities that Deborah has displayed over the last five years qualify her to seek the position on the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula. Respectfully submitted, Martha Culbertson Instructor Mount San Jacinto College ®I VJd 'ouaw a•• r, oto // • ?Solos It it: pItwa tu(A 3( 4L' Dui ;au uoa of a;wrsait lou op asuait `aativ.lsr2i:lt:}o aq .‘tow a,11 Ji •:Sntunwwo3 ay; an3as o;tuoneapua 334 U! uasu:t;srit.f) 's LN 3.10C1dnx Ar.30033ti ar11 •gponbal 3aUA\O wt)ti ur luiodwaiA it:r1trol i U% liul;u ouowap aptt.n uo!ovt9 ,Spawn; t: ut pa;Z Lh.UOa put: pane>.u.kh `pau pp 0111 $13*.id fitipt1St4E ur uxst t:uorssajwd 41;ou3;n puu aautaan;ttxacl `clitis.tapt:aj pa;u;suowap sett uasuaispoo tow •sio)paaim Jo) Puuuu a ! Ajluaaar ;sour put, as;sn.UwoD A1,3!AaN Aumuamoity3 `sash:w o tarsuso it:.rnaaal!tja.ty atr:»03-)rinaatua•1 Jo)331sd s> .00z JStiSriv aauis uasuatsutj;) tr_roga(t 4Jb pplio):h pm:tl.iutul:mug a :tuaaucr):iuyy;t wc)tim°L 1710E '9 aunt. tucJa qa uO}ertH M+MM luatua6euevy uollei,o55y to a'uoliJ»xj o o-1 t (i 96) _xed 81/00-1 'Z(ic6) :auotid L88Z6 e?uaoTit;O '0>P21uoJSuEo U 0 I P/A\V PLoi_i UOIUE'3 pF,'omeki 80.131£ • 06-11 - 14P03 .32 RCVO ,., r[ r City of Temecula P, 1%®a , 41000 Main Street .t Temecula, CA 92590 Comm/ssion Appointme�uN 1 1 2014 •, 1989 rA,, www.cityoftemecula.org Application (951) 694-6444 641-1r s 7"AftNW nicer. •�5fr . .:, -al••'f `�. Y't 0v:' ,t'"' ^ i..vr ..�.4•'i,�'C Y rt-•r,.`vs.ti r Fonpropetir,consideration, you,must currently.be;a�resident�of•the _-;r{.te:-•: . ti�� r. �` �• '�eCiYro,f�,•.eriieti� -� = e'r�.Cityof,Temecula•and aRegistered oter wihin•ttieCty_Limits.ofth . , cula ^ �''n'Ai Please Cheek One: •>4 Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Z2.. Are you a City Registered Voter? /LS NAME: ha A2F)1 Co iti/Vog70A., OCCUPATION: IV Fo/ os ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: IZ i virg s, ci F Ca s c iiJTy EMPLOYER ADDRESS: /O So ,Lyr E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: Iv Albitt 04? ,Lr N•//� s� /e C DA/T,,, , o ' ,) W y IqR AS o4 Tyra D o D `Db''rtz"r is A55 oet r,& i c' .1"711 �R %.aovAC D$it,e.t.sr. s by d Ts. List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 75/11* 4,1- TR,+cf s4,01C'o .rlrtsoN / 19 - aoy flit/ iSl �rc PoiaA >'�r ?AA/Cs Ofni f; ,:o A) aDo ,✓zAS AC c c .i) /ZA,v .0/.Rd �Y - 1 R/rsla•wT y �.oi3 - PSR srcir.T List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): ✓+ �• Cf �J L,L /�v . n,tr, )-1 CA- CAA.r*aAA)%A CO3U� ic�ss a7/�1�pw4h1 ,,-tJs) L7.4-.4 u 04- Sow wresT /Ci✓irRsrdiz <ion.,�/yr State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) 7. ' 'O u, z_ rs_ r h 2 to,4A T o.f 7-A/c l ►t N A,-,d Vi 51 o,v :v T h t C o-u 7/w tti ,r� ei s vg. MDN r a .. / -T s/Ac . . 10 /2L/( CrCvrGZ /h,s f/,SICrv , I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information public Information urp s. Signature: 74/AAitY' Date: 611— Please c—Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE V 06-10-14PO4 :45 RCVD City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Commission Appointment Temecula, CA 92590 7 E CONED 9x9 www.cityoftemecula.org App//cat/on (951) 694-6444 Mk 10 2014 For proper consideration;you must currently be a resident of the CITY CLERKS DEPT, City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the • City of Temecula • • Please Check One: \, Planning _ Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident (p Are you a City Registered Voter? $ NAM` ► (73 c-acLj OCCUPATIO . e.. ,e a 111— cfb,:rr ADDRES DAYTIME PHONEIMIEMIL EVENING - 5CYf.p EMPLOYER NAMEQ1K GizTVe C fl-\.e- EMPLOYER ADDRESS-. tea. ,6 E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: h SChooI -O., 3 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: _ 5-E- C�Id i c� '�' � 1 e cin. tri S/31 (Li, ua\\ \ -Q- C r ,�F in9 -�Y`Q_ K Ps'�c�c2 r,r1-s 0-e C3 t ct Tv�,�x List any organization to which you elong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, noh-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.):Cc_x.r, Mun; Socvc c € a_6 , c cio. cJLI a Lb S-t_ m(znl I-12mecuQ0. Ce-r‘ eLcx.n. +v` (`rl u�r� 4-r�, T-e m C a m h of . State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.)3 a3 e d Old ' r lL -\ Locol C e.v i e 600e I, ' er ce Lw c<c, CuMry-\2a-r_2. '--S3ruce Cc;Pe_ Suso.n \oar\ I understand • _ :ny or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this inform. ion for •ublic informa • p poses. co/gife7L A iI/,i�.4//. , , � i / l Date: CIS 11 Please marl or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office C? k eJ 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Rosaetena(Rosie) Girardot Fund Develo ment Coordinator Prior to being approached by Tammy Wilson ta Interview and take on the duties and responsibilities os Fund Development Coordinator, tor Ook Grave Center Rosaelena Girordot had always served the local community and its many non-profits os o public speoker and spokesperson, encouraging organizations and corporations to lade to their own community as a place ta benefit from their philanthropic endeovors. In addition to being an outstanding lender tar Ook Grave and overseeing the necessory fundraising, progroms, reaching aut to the community, Ms. Girardat worked with the Southwest Riverside United Woy Agency as Accounting Coordinator and spokesperson, Conine Support Teams and Boys and Girls Club in Temecula addressing the various Rotary clubs, corporations and agencies they benefit from. She Is recognized os a public advocate in her community having served an the Advisory Board for Project Touch In their mission to help the homeless sttuotian as well as volunteering with various corporate fundraisers and events such as Reality Rally, Susan Kalman , Temecula Veteran Center, Rad Run. She currently sits on the Old Town Business Association Board representing fhe residence of Old Town. Prior to her public service, and Iite as a homemaker raising 6 bays, 2 of them as foster children, she helped her then husband develop o smdi winery in the Temecula area. She and her husband met while Rosso Elena worked with the Democratic Party during the Clinton administration. She is now divorced rolsing her two younger boys Thomas 15 '/2 Matthew 13 and live in Old Town Temecula at the Old Town Front Street Plaza. Reterences: Lou Ficke-CFO Commerce Bank Bruce Gripe- Development Manager Susan G Kamen Joy O'Neil-Global Medical Supplies Jahn Atwood-Retired Tayoto of Temecula Lad Marruffa-Owner Virtual Outsourcing Solutions Mark Bergman-President LGC Tommy Wilson-CEO Kristine Turner-Creative Director Kristine Turner Biz 06-10-14P02:43 RCVD "` It i''' City of Temecula srt 7 . 'ft ;all" , 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Commission Appointments 10 2014 i9xv www.cityoftemecula org App//Cat/on (951)694-6444 CCTV ivc Zoaao) ®t2PT, For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula Please Chock One: / Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident /5 Are you a City Registered Voter? 1 C'S NAME: 1-0 Q06.4 OCCUPATION: a1 77C 6/42/“/1.- ADDRESS: /42/ /1.-ADDRESS: - DAYTIME PHONE: Wit EVENING� pPHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: i ED °cit f f`t+7�. E�1 t 1 t �� p W t 6 3250 EMPLOYER ADDRESS: *13430 T� 57, T E U 4 E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: POO 3A ►N6 co l.Q'r C v,)&51-1%A.)Ns� Utt e QeAL E-�T y rct op `1 A�A C3Aowr&CEvrrl Ai c4 pI D gym ) u C O List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 11'}15 WOv CO ee MI r1 tArr e4 1301,10 po,loll List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): 5t\.3r1~1 W4�1" JZ1Ve>edy Cova TV i3olto.o 0/; 124-At 7,ac' ME141L, 00s '((c PIS eC vL t a +Av41,3 en 0 G !kr, vv C-'v^C&-/ 7iK. 1N uh^'D �1/� =f'i `1�^i o r RE f -1bN-S , m erV q o $v N/2-06e & W' ti �-t d State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are ualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) 5E. ft-TT,-c--t ) I understand that.ny or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information to 1•ublic information purposes. Signature: 111111, Date: / 1 y aAiipt-:.e mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE I, QUALITIES AND ATTRIBUTES OF AN EFFECTIVE COMMISSIONER • Informed citizen (someone knowledgeable about local affairs) • Ability to have a good rapport with citizens • Genuine concern for the community as a whole • Be a good listener • Served in another capacity prior to commission service(i.e. volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.) • Relates well to other people, including other commissioners • Has the ability to accept decisions not of their own personal view if that is the will of the majority CITY OF TEMECULA OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD POSITIONS AVAILABLE The Temecula City Council invites interested residents of the City of Temecula to apply for two positions on the Old Town Local Review Board. The positions are for one regular term through June 15, 2017. To be a member of the Old Town Local Review Board it is necessary to be a resident within the city limits of the City of Temecula and a registered voter. Application forms are available in the City Clerk's Office and also on the City of Temecula Website (www.cityoftemecula.org). Completed applications will be accepted at Temecula City Hall, City Clerk's Office,through Wednesday,June 11,2014,at 4:00 PM. Completed applications will also be accepted by mail if received by the deadline. Mail applications to: 41000 Main Street,Temecula,CA 92590. Additional information is available in the City Clerk's Office, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, (951)694-6444. • • Letter of Interest for the Vacant Seat on the City of Temecula's Planning Commission June 10,2014 Name: John Goga Address: Citizen of US: Yes Registered Voter in Temecula: Yes Resident of the city: Yes 18 years of age or older: Yes Attendance: 1 live and work in Old Town Temecula and with my flexible schedule as a real estate broker I expect to be able to attend all planning commission meetings Occupation: Owner of RedRock, A Real Estate Company To City Council Members and/or Members of the Temecula Planning Commission it is an honor to be able to submit my application for selection to fill the vacant seat on the City of Temecula's Planning Commission. I have been a resident of Temecula since 1998. During that time, I have seen the build out of the city and the incredible and exciting growth of our community. I believe in the "wine country" atmosphere of Temecula and in maintaining managed growth of the city now that we've established ourselves as an exceptional place to live and work. The high quality of life that our residents have come to expect takes careful planning and responsible management. As a resident of Temecula for the past 15 years, and now a business owner in our city, t have found that 1 have a passion for serving our community. 1 bring a unique perspective to the Planning Commission with my life experiences residing in the Vintage Hills community, in Temeku Hills, in our wine country for 3 years and now right here in old town. I've raised my 3 children here, coached their baseball and soccer teams and watched them all graduate from Great Oak High School. I've been in the real estate industry since 1993 and have lived and worked in both San Diego and Orange Counties for a number of years and have experienced the successful growth in the communities (Poway and Mission Viejo) I lived in. I have a bachelor's degree in Economics with a minor in statistics, have successfully completed the Real Estate Development and Growth certificate program at UC San Diego and I have built my own home in Temecula's wine country. I am excited to participate in the continued growth of Temecula and I look forward to supporting projects that maintain or improve the quality of life here, while protecting the image security of the special features Temecula has become known for. S'rlerel , �t l J.� n Gc _ : oker RedRock A Real Estate Company John a EXECUTIVE LEVEL MANAGER: SALES •OPERATIONS • BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT I am a creative, results-oriented business developer and expert in cultivating loyal, long term B2B and B2C client relationships. I have been a key contributor to corporate bottom lines by building and managing cross functional sales teams and spearheading multimillion dollar revenue generation. I offer 25+ years of distinguished experience in executive leadership of medium to large sales operations. I possess a high level of passion related to the continued pursuit of new business opportunities. New Business Development• Account Expansion• Operations Management• Strategic Planning Lead Generation•Market Penetration • Executive Leadership• Budgeting• Prospecting Database Management•Sates Conferences•Trade Shows•Marketing•Negotiations Process Reengineering •Resource Optimization •Sales Forecasting• Product Launch •Sales Support Needs Assessment• High-Impact Presentations• Relationship Development• Online Resources PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2013 — Present RedRock, A Real Estate Company Temecula, CA Broker!Owner—Residential, Commercial and Property Management 2009— 2012 Real Estate First, Inc. Temecula, CA Senior Vice President—Manage overall operation of real estate office. 2008 — 2009 RealEstate.com Temecula, CA Realtor—Facilitated real estate buy and sell transactions for clients. 2008 —2009 Ameripath Mortgage Irvine, CA Sales Director— Hired, trained and managed Loan Officer call center sales team to develop conventional and FHA business. Responsible for maintaining lead capture and sales goals. 1998 —2008 Lehman Brothers, Inc. Irvine, CA Branch Manager and Account Executive, BNC Mortgage and Aurora Loan Services—Producing Manager of wholesale origination branch that was consistently a top producing branch for the company. Managed 12 Account Executives. Established and maintained strong relationships with broker community. Regional Vice President of Sales, BNC Mortgage—Managed 7 Western U.S. wholesale mortgage origination branches comprised of over 75 sales and operations employees. Traveled extensively. Director of Correspondent Lending, BNC Mortgage — Built and managed BNC Mortgage's Correspondent Lending Division doing business nationwide. Traveled extensively. 1996—1998 AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp-VP of Portfolio Acquisitions Ontario,CA 1995—1996 Prime Financial Corporation-VP of Marketing Costa Mesa, CA 1992—1995 Bank of America -Manager of Portfolio Acquisitions Poway, CA 1992—1996 Century 21 Realty -Realtor Poway,CA 1989—1992 Wells Fargo Bank-Secondary Marketing Supervisor San Diego, CA 1986—1989 Trustbank FSB -Secondary Marketing Supervisor McLean, VA 1985—1986 First Jersey Securities-Registered Representative McLean,VA ASSOCIATIONS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS California Association of Mortgage Brokers • Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce • Member, REO Agents.net• California BRE Salesperson's License •Cal Association of Realtors• Bank of America Management Training Certificate of Completion • Wells Fargo Credit Analysis Training Certificate of Completion • Prior SEC Series 7 and Series 63 licenses • Real Estate Investor • Designed and managed construction of personal residence • Published articles • Who's Who of Mortgage Pros • UC San Diego — Real Estate Development and Growth Certificate Program • Westminster College — Pennsylvania — Graduated May 1984 - BA in Economics " RECEIVED City of Temecula • `% gJ 4tflOt3 Mair, street Commission AppointmA 1 12014 L Temecula, CA 92690 1989 . www.cityofternecula.org Application CITY'ct.t,:mu utfaPT% (951)694-6444 • • For`proper consideration, you must currently be"a resident of the • •, City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the • • •City of Temecula • • Please Check One: X Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident -3 Are you a City Registered Voter? Ye) NAME: JGSot•, l&pr+, OCCUPATION: Rat £4+ ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:■ EVENING PHONE: 5 4 w4t.- EMPLOYER NAME: for f`e`d Re5.4(K)-ia LL EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 5516 Aitoilt4 Dr. 5.,' LO0 SD G� c .�•S E-MAI EducatJional Back roD revs: Me44-(rt leoup S t.1lCvt/tatpws'- 2 17 f 3s FAAce SDSV Zcwc List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): � •L�tS �"-t 5Ah 1�� Se '7* � f SSC Shu 1i ; f J State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) . I�a�,� lc rc'-'k be- cies-e/fppz'cJ ta�51,1rt-1/7 7i a-lee, 4-4, 1,44441-` Ati 0/11.4-(1444,-5 . Z A,-5 », e1;r1 ` '�evdareci I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of (4-7c, this information for public information purposes. ' b+, Signature: t Date: ////`1 Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE u V- u- I4ruI - DU Itt,Vu City of Temecula • •A � A' �.4" 41000 Main Street >s 18 t 4 P 1' . }Q ,rt ,r • Temecula, CA 92590 Commission Appointment y g Application �ya9 www.cit ottemecuia.or RECEIVED (951)694-6444 JUN I o 2014 For proper consideration,you must currently.be a resident of the: •, City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City_Limits of theCITY C`BIUt uteri City of Temecula : Please Cheek One: V Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident ' Are you a City Registered Voter? Y65 NAME: ff-ATC /14c- 4-c-/ -./A) OCCUPATION: e7726--0 -it1'4lL v5 cnrc s-5 O vV.VE2 ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: ' EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: pL SG E A-Trf}ctf s A f S S r, anJ ,(-A/ ) A-LL OF 77716 FOL4..0/4//RIS. List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may.attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are.encouraged.) • I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature:Si �e 9 � _-----.� Date: 6'/b /.=, 41/Y /, lease mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE 1 Application for Planning Commission Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident:Two years Are you a City Registered Voter:Yes Name:Jane Rosso McMackin Occu ation:Retired Business Owner Employer Name: NA Educational Background/Degrees: A Certificate,Graphic Arts,St.Paul Technical College,St.Paul,MN A BA in Business,Metropolitan State University,St.Paul,MN A Certificate, Feature Film Writing,UCLA List any City or County Board,Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: A Secretary,Board of Directors,Harveston Community Association(2013—2015)—one year A Council Member,Isle of Palms City Council,Isle of Palms,SC(2004-2008)--four years A Board Member, Redux Contemporary Art Center,Charleston,SC(2003)—one year A Treasurer,Print Studio South,Charleston,SC(2001—2003)—two years A Neighborhood Committee member for revitalizing Snelling Ave.,St.Paul,MN(1998)—one year A President,Minnesota Association of Government Communicators(1990-1992)—two years List any organizations to which you belong(professional, technical,volunteer groups,non-profit organizations, service clubs,etc.): A Temecula Valley Woman's Club,Temecula,California A P.E.O.,Murrieta, California A The San Diego Zoo,San Diego,California A The Sierra Club State why you wish to serve on this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position.Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) I can't think of anything more satisfying than planning for the development of a city and watching it come to fruition.When my husband and 1 moved to Southern California (to follow family),we looked for a place to live that would feel like home to us.As soon as we visited Temecula, we knew this was the place.The feel of the city is the feel of a small town.And yet it is packed with amenities.I believe this has come about through excellent planning.I would like to be a part of that process on-going. I have served on several boards and commissions,and most importantly, I served on city council in the city I where I lived in South Carolina.That city was a tourist draw,as Temecula is becoming.My goal on city council was to balance the tourism activity with the residential quality of the town.While tourism helped to make our economy healthy,I felt it was also important to maintain the residential base and ensure the quality of life for our residents.I initiated ordinances there to help maintain that balance. It appears to me that Temecula may be facing some of the same issues as it grows as a tourist destination,and I have some experience to bring to the table. I also see some exciting opportunities that I would love to be involved with,and feel I could bring good ideas to,such as the re-development of Jefferson Avenue and the development of Winchester Hills on Ynez. Attached are letters of reference. Thank you for this opportunity to apply to the City of Temecula Planning Commission. i'ii .r., Harvesion June 9, 2014 Re: Jane McMackin -City of Temecula Planning Commission appointment reference To whom it may concern: As the Executive Director of Harveston Community Association I have had the great pleasure of working with Jane McMackin for the past year on the Harveston Board of Directors. Jane moved into Harveston in July 2012 and immediately wanted to know more about the Community and Town she lives in and got involved as soon as the opportunity presented itself in July 2013. Her enthusiasm for knowledge,passion about her Community and her friendly approach are just a few of the great characters that make Jane not only a great person but a great Board member. She comes to meetings prepared,she does her own independent research on agenda items being presented so that she can have informed discussions with her fellow board members. She is empathic when listening to homeowners concerns and issues but also diplomatic in her decision making as she knows that the decisions made will affect the entire community and set precedence for future requests. As a Board member of a Master Planned Community,Jane and the rest of the Board,are challenged with setting policy and making decisions that impact a wide range of homeowners. Jane became a part of this board with no hidden personal agenda to change Harveston,rather her number one goal to was remain vigilant about any future changes to ensure that we maintain the quality of life residents have come to expect at Harveston. She has embodied this moto with every discussion and formal action she votes on as a member of Harveston. In order to be a successful board,the decisions have to be made collaboratively and address the greater good of the Community,which means sometimes placing their own opinions to the side to ensure success for their overall Community which Jane does time and time again. Jane recently became involved with our Landscape Committee with no agenda just purely to learn more about the Communities greatest asset—landscaping. She and the rest of the Board play an integral part in the budgetary and fiscal decision making as well as disciplinary and delinquency decisions that can affect the financial viability and structure of the Community as a whole. She handles each matter with compassion, intellect and diligence. I know I can speak for the rest of my Harveston staff-we absolutely love her Community Spirit and enjoy working with her in making Harveston the best it can be now and into the future. I know that she would provide this same approach In her role as a member of the City of Temecula Planning Commission and think her appointment would be a great asset to the City for many years to come. Should you have any further questions about Jane McMackin,please do not hesitate to reach out to me at Harveston at Sincgxe ly, c‘- C-\_______ s nne reen,CMCA Harveston Executive Oirector citrtna►rfarl ha,Kirs Wraaira 67aeletarn*i,l Linda lovvorn Tucker May 27,2013 City of Temecula City Cleric's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula,CA 92590 Dear Decision-makers with the City of Temecula: it is with a great deal of pleasure that I offer this letter of recommendation for Jane McMackin. 1 first met Jane In the early 2000's when she volunteered to assist with the City of isle of Palms 50"' Anniversary celebration. She was a virtual stranger to me at that time since she and George had only recently moved to the Isle of Palms. The 50th Anniversary was a project a year in the planning and expected to draw a large crowd to the City on event days. Jane worked all year long and hours and hours during the celebration itself. I have had a lot of experience with volunteer efforts over my almost forty years in local government and I have learned that volunteers tend to fall into two categories: those with ideas,BUT an expectation for others to execute those ideas and then,the rare ones,those with ideas and the willingness to put In the work to bring those ideas Into reality. Jane McMackin falls into the latter category, Not only does she have good ideas,but she Is also willing to"go to the mat"to bring those Ideas,and those Ideas of others,to fruition. As Jane's Involvement with the City grew,she ultimately ran successfully for City Council and became one of my basses, She took her place within the policy-setting body and used her intelligence and wit to gain their respect as a new member, Her single greatest attribute in that regard is her willingness to do the research to get the answers and the historical knowledge necessary to aid in developing policy decisions. Jane Is a person with vision. She reaches out to staff resources,in partnership, to gain the necessary knowledge to determine what will or will not work to achieve that vision. She listens carefully to others and accepts the will of the majority gracefully. While on City Council,she started an initiative and worked with fellow council members to develop a rental property ordinance which recognized the value of tourism to the island community,but established regulations to preserve peace and quality of life for the full-time residents in the neighborhoods. This effort was not without opposition and endured Intense debate by factions on both sides,but has now been in place many years and working successfully: Further white on Council,she became active with the Municipal Association of South Carolina further expanding her network of resources. She also participated In Charleston County's Citizens'Academy to gain knowledge at the county level. She took some of that information and translated it to application with the City's Recommendation for Jane McMackin May 27,2013 Page Two personnel. In this regard,her advocacy of the City's people infrastructure was always greatly appreciated by me and my colleagues. I could write a REALLY long letter of recommendation for Jane and could go on and on about her energy, artistic talent,brilliance,her kindness,great sense of humor,love of family,generosity to animals and caring heart. I expect,though,the letter would be too long to read and likely lose its effectiveness due to length. Jane and her husband George transcended to our friends. Jane is that way. The relationships that she develops are forever and,even in her absence,I know that she still wants the best for isle of Palms and the best for me and my family. As a member of your Planning Commission or as any participant in the Temecula's volunteer groups, Jane McMackin would serve as a valuable asset. Please feel free to contact me via all means—electronically at if you would i e urt er information. Very ours, VA Unda Lovvor Tucker May 27'h, 2013 City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Whom It May Concern: In the six months that I have known Jane McMackin, I have discovered a rare and talented woman whose passion for the city of Temecula -along with her impressive experience in those positions crucial to decision-making regarding Temecula's future - make her a perfect candidate for a position on the Community Services Commission. Theatre Arts West launched in January with the vision of growing Temecula as an arts destination. Jane introduced herself to me immediately after our first production and volunteered to become involved in any way she could to ensure the realization of TAWs objectives. A crucial quality essential for anyone desiring to be responsible for the development of organizations, cities, counties or countries is the ability to be successful as both a decision-making leader and someone who will perform the basic tasks needed in order to bring goals to fruition. Jane is such a person, and I enthusiastically endorse her for a position on Temecula's Community Services Commission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Best regards, Gailee Walker Wells Producing Artistic Director Theatre Arts West May 27,2013 Rahul R Kumar and Nicole Kumar City of Temecula City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Oear City of Temecula: My wife and I have had the pleasure of being neighbors with Jane McMackin for almost 12 months. Our families have both moved here from the Orange County area. Ms. McMackin has shown great interest in the City of Temecula and my wife and I and our neighbors utilize her experience,judgment and knowledge when inquiring about current events in the City. Jane's background as a City Councilmember in isle of Palms,South Carolina as well as her ability to listen and distill complicated facts to understandable levels have made her an exemplary neighbor and very well suited for a Planning Commission post. My wife and I both share a common interest in the betterment of our City. We are raising our young child in the City and see how committed Jane is. In her short time here,Jane has already become a member of Theatre Arts West and has attended a number of Commission meetings. For example, she provided us all of the information on the Mercedes of Temecula project. I know I am not alone in saying that appointing Jane McMackin to the Planning Commission would be in the best interests of the City of Temecula. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at Sincerely, Rahul R Kumar Vice President—Veolia Transportation RECEIVEd 06-10-14 A10:07 RCVDJUN 1 0 2014 City of Temecula CITY CLERKS DE.01. P! � 14:0A 41 oo0 Main Street Commission Appointment � L Temecula,CA 92590 www.cityoftemecula org Application (951)694-6444 For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the City of Temecula • Please check One: XX Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 1 Are you a City Registered Voter?Yes NAME: John B. Rogers, F.E. OCCUPATION: Civil Engineer ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: CLE Engineering, Inc. 41146 Elm Street, Suite G EMPLOYER ADDRESS: Murrieta. CA 92562 E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: Bachelor of Engineering, Civil Engineering, Yale Univertity List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: Director, Santa Rosa Community Services District, 1989-1993 Appointed by Supervisor Buster to Citizen' s Committee to draft hillside development ordinance, 2004-2005 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): American Society of Civil Engineers, Fellow and local officer. Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors of California, local officer. California Land Surveyors Association. Yale Engineering Associat ion. The Nature Conservancy. Sierra Club. State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if.necessary_ Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) Please refer to accompanying statement. I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified.I consent to the release of this information for public Information purposes. Signature: ���� Date: ✓ii/!E /D ,ZP� Please mail or ret,. "to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 f ain Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Jun 10, 2014 APPLICATION OF JOHN B. ROGERS, P.E. FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION I have lived and worked in and around Temecula since 1981, when George Graynar and I founded Graynar-Rogers Engineering. In 1988 my wife Anne and I built our home in DeLuz, just outside the Temecula City Limits. In 2013, after 25 years in DeLuz, we moved to our current home in Chardonnay Hills. I was licensed by the Stata of California as a Registered Civil Engineer in 1973. I am a Life Member and a Fellow of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Since 1981 I have worked in Temecula and Murrieta as a Civil Engineer. For most of this time I have been in private practice, including the past 9 years with CLE Engineering, Inc. CLE is the successor to S&A Surveying, which had its beginnings in Temecula in the 1970's I hava had several jobs in the public sector, including one year as a contrect engineering plan reviewer for the City of Temecula, six years as General Manager of Santa Rosa Community Services District (now DeLuz Community Services District), and a yaar as part-time General Manager of Elsinore-Murrieta-Anze Resource Conservation District. I have been involved in tha planning process for countless private and public developments during this pariod, working on projects and prasenting cases et Directors' Hearings, Planning Commissions, City Councils and Boards of Supervisors throughout Riverside, San Diago and San Bernardino Counties. I have a working knowledge of planning end entitlamants processes, and have prepared and submittad plans for projects ranging from simple lot line adjustments to major commercial and industrial developments. For many years, I have been a strong advocate of intelligent, far-sighted, environmentally-conscious land planning. Past projects within the City on which I was the principal Civil Engineer have included Temecula Valley High, Margarita Middle, and Rancho Elementary Schools, Saint Catherine of Alexandria and Hope Lutheran Churchas, Ronald Reagan Sports Park, Pala Community Park, and Chaparral Village Shopping Center. In past yaars, I have not hesitated to become involved as a vocal opponent of projects that I was convinced were not in tha community's best interest. I was part of the successful opposition to the renewal of the Walker Basin Spacific Plan, the Rainbow 500-KV power line, and Liberty Quarry. On behalf of DeLuz Community Services District, I was instrumantal in convincing the Riverside County Board of Supervisors to deny time axtensions to two large tracts on the ridgeline west of Temacula. Had they been approved, thosa subdivisions would hava had a devastating impact on the lands that are now open space, thus permanently protecting the lands that are so effectively illustratad on tha City's own official seal. On several occasions I have been a supporter of projects thet hed e potential for positive impacts on the City, such as the mosque currently under construction on Nicholas Road. Currently, I am very concerned about the overall impact on our City of the long-term effects of climate change, including water and food supply issues and environmental degredetion, as well as the challenges that we face in accommodating economic development and inevitable population growth. Property owners have a right to use their property for the purposes defined in the General Plan and in zoning regulations; conversely, residents have a right to expect the continued enjoyment of their quality of life. This is the challenge of the Plenning Commission: to essist our capeble City Staff in implementetion of the policies and goals established by the City Council. I would be honored to be given this opportunity. Three letters of recommendation from local citizens are enclosed. In addition, the following references are offered: Andrew Webster P.E. Rancho California Water District George A. Johnson, P.E , Riverside County Executive Office Mick Wilson, Wilson Creek Wine end Vineyards George H. Gra ner, S.E., Structural En ineer • IWO MARKHAM DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP,INC, June 3,2014 City of Temecula Honorable City Council Members 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Re: Appointment to the Temecula Planning Commission I have been informed that Mr.John B.Rogers,P.E.has applied for appointment to the open seat on the Temecula Planning Commission. I would encourage the City Council to confirm his appointment. I have known Mr.Rogers since the early 1980's,when we both established Civil Engineering offices in Temecula. Since that time,we have been colleagues and friendly competitors,working on neighboring projects as well as on developments that have built upon the others'work. Throughout these years, he has been capable,honest and forthcoming,always anxious to realize the best outcome for the community. Mr. Rogers'work has included numerous significant projects in and around Temecula. He understands the planning process, has a sound working knowledge of entitlements,subdivision and development practices,environmental regulations and State laws governing the land development industry. His presence on the Planning Commission would be a very positive step for the ongoing improvement of the City of Temecula. Thank you for your consideration. incerel tar arkham, President M.r am Development Management Group, Inc. 41635 Enterprise Circle North,Suite B Temecula,CA 92590-5614 (951)296-3466 Fax:(951)296-3476 wwwmarkhamdmg.com KATHLEEN HAMILTON June St", 2014 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: As a Temecula resident since 1978, I've been provided the opportunity to interact with many of the City and Riverside County Agencies over the years: The Temecula City Council, the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, the Riverside County Planning Commission and the De Luz Community Services District, Flood Control, Parks& Recreation,etc. As I result I've learned of and become acquainted with a number of individuals committed to the best interests of our area. Those able to balance economic growth v.environmental concerns and those whose service to our community truly extends beyond career advancement. John Rogers is such an individual. Each year John organizes volunteer groups to participate in the annual De Luz Clean-Up. John was instrumental in Temecula's efforts to save the Murrieta Creek as well as serving as a pro bono consultant on other projects that have enabled Temecula preserve those qualities that make it a most desirable place to raise a family and at the same time much more than a bedroom community. Professionally, John Rogers has served as the General Manager of the Santa Rosa Community Services District.As a Civil Engineer John has been commissioned to provide his expertise to such community projects such as Temecula Valley High School, Margarita Middle School, Ronald Regan and Pala Parks, and St. Catherine's of Alexandria. John's abilities, his character and his integrity make him an ideal choice as a member of Temecula's Planning Commission. Sincerely, i Kathleen Hamilton / John Hamilton Frederick J. Bartz June 2, 2014 City of Temecula Attn: Honorable City Council Members 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92590 RE: Open Planning Commission Position TO: Mayor Edwards, Councilmen Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, and Washington It is with pleasure that I recommend Mr. John Rogers for the City of Temecula Planning Commission. I have known John for a number of years, and find him to be a very caring, intelligent, and honest individual. He is also a very community-oriented person. John has extensive planning credentials, and is highly experienced in this area, which I believe makes him an excellent candidate for Temecula's Planning Commission. John would be thorough, and fair, in his duties as a Planning Commissioner. As a member of the Planning Commission, I believe John would represent the City of Temecula extremely well; therefore, I strongly urge you to consider and select John for Temecula's Planning Commission. Sincerely,Jf.71—$2-4 /Z Fred Bartz cc Aaron Adams, City Manager .:''' off =��, City of Temecula ___ 41000 Main Street,"tow( Commission Temecula, CA 92590 Appointment App lication ' www.cityoftemecula.org j (951)694-6444 't=CEIVED 41 .,.-4..:4,4»;%.4.t--:,..•"^f!.Ii%e.:6•.;":7":''14�- - •;. r•.G r':,er..r..7lw.S..'4•r4.4ZPS it-,..."--.`. e�, e 4, JUN Z 1 2014 ;Ls.;§f,c_Forproprconsderation;•ysoupus!cu:rfittya►resident.oftti ,A.�0i I.i. City.ofTemecula,aend aRgs'eced Voterwithin the CitLw! ts.ofthrlr ; 14 t'j.l?Otivi 't �J it..w ; . N. ),` `5, • �T.i5 � ` i riY C . • o� i.Gty;nf:Temerua. ',3i � tEKtoe p� . ': .. V Nv,,ys r Please Chock One: _ X Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 3 Are you a City Registered Voter? Y NAME: JASON SIGLER OCCUPATION: FIREFIGHTR/PARAMEDIC ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:MIII. EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: MIRAMAR FIRE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 7224 MITSCHER WAY SAN DIEGO CA 92145 E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: AA-IN FIRE SCIENCE as IN BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MBA IN auSINESS. FIREFIGHTER/PARAMEDIC INSTRUCTOR, EMT TEACHERCFDENT COMMAND SYSTEMS-(ICS) (NIMS) (FEMA), CPR/FIRST AID TRAINER List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: NONE List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION,IAFF,NREMT,RIVERSIDE YOUNG REPUaLICANS State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of thia Information for public Information purposes. Signature: Date: 6'el-I`! ;;/.-Pleasemail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office / 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE V Jason Sigler To whom it may concern, I know I can serve the city of Temecula and the community by relating all my knowledge,skills,and abilities from working and serving the public. My career as a firefighter/paramedic has taught me how to interact and communicate with the public.This line of work has a created sense a strong sense of customer service and community as I am always in the public and represent the city pride. I also am teacher and can effectively communicate and listen to my students from many different backgrounds and has helped me see multiple perspectives. I believe that being proactive and looking at the big picture by staying abreast of community needs through minutes and events will help the goals of the city. I have a personal responsible to help keeping a great community for my children. I am able to adjust quickly to different situation and fix problems by making decisions that benefit the whole or following orders based on a specific goal.As a volunteer firefighter where I grew up and volunteering at the local hospital my outgoing personality can draw people in and the ability to speak in front of large crowds I can convey messages to the public that are understandable to give back and help the community. My education and experience can help develop,implement,and adjust specific goals to the planning, community and public safety needs. My personality can blend into any situation and look for the best outcome. My sense of community and being a family man will drive me for the best in our city. Respectfully, Jason Michael Sigler JASON SIGLER EXPERIENCE • Miramar Fire Department—Firefghter/Paramedic Responsible for the protection of life,property,and the environment through: 2009 Present Suppression,Prevention, Public Education and Patient care in San Diego County • Del Mar Fire Department—Firefighter/Paramedic(P7) 2007-2009 Responsible for the protection of life,property,and the environment through: Suppression, Prevention, Public Education and Patient care in San Diego County • La Habra Heights Fire Department—Volunteer Firefighter/Paramedic 2006-2007 Responsible for the protection of life,property,and the environment through: Suppression, Prevention,Public Education and Patient care in LA County. • Dactar's Ambulance/Califarnia Paramedic Institute—Instructor 2005-present Instruction of CPR,BLS,ACLS,and PALS under the certification of the American Heart Association. EMT/Paramedic topics include:Cardiology,Trauma, Pediatrics, Medical emergencies,and treatment strategies under National Registry • Chino Valley Fire Department—Firefighter/Paramedic 2007- Responsible for the protection of life,property,and the environment through:Suppression, zoos l; Prevention, Public Education and Patient care in San Bernardino County. • Rural/Metro-Paramedic 2005 2007 • Orange County Fire Authority-Reserve Firefighter 2000-2005 CERTIFICATIONS Firefighter I ICS 100/700 Firefighter 2 Instructor IA/lB Haz-Mat Fro/Fra Confined Space Swift water rescue Wildland S-130/190 Paramedic ACLS/PALS Instructor EDUCATION Allan Hancock College—Associates of Arts-Fire Science Cal State San Marcos=Bachelors of Science—Public Administration University of Phoenix=MBA O6-05-1 4 PO 3:32 RCVO Irina MUD �� '' 'F`_____ City of Temecula JUN 06 2014 A, I* 41000 Main Street Commission Appointment . :;a-MR= �r ....'fi :',. . Temecula, CA 92590 iysv www.cityoftemecula.org Application ..,,. .,,, (951)694-6444 For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the i City of Temecula /Please Check Ono: V--Planning Community Services Public Traffic Saf ty Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident Are you a City Registered Voter? • NAME: I'cc Lc/ Ci-o-r1SJe Ill OCCUPATION: PiAli- ADDRESS:-■ DAYTIME PHONE: {{^^ EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: iii7////-4 2e/ 're-IV/cc CA Ai 2 Nk7to J4L 6.4A402,0 EMPLOYER ADDRESS: /62) G2,'16 6 s • E-MAIL y :_ Educational Background/Degrees: • GA Polk r., Ser „ {.QNEverf,' 04 1-ktmAt f W / all C't List any City or County Board,Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: woojE List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical,volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): CAi,6,,,,,t„ Av- idgrrovv4L 6444D State why you wish to serve or this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper If necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) . &#fitc hof I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified, I consent to the release of this information for public-information purposes. "" Signature: / /- _ Date: 0'�+ �/ "lease mail or return to:City of Temecula, City a, G tY Clerks Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE L QUALITIES AND ATTRIBUTES OF AN EFFECTIVE COMMISSIONER • Informed citizen(someone knowledgeable about lace! affairs) • Ability to heve e good rapport with citizens • Genuine concern for the community as a whole • Be a good listener • Served in another capacity prior to commission service(i.e.volunteer groups, non-profit orgenizations,service clubs, etc.) • Relates well to other people,including other commissioners • Hes the ability to accept decisions not of their own personel view if that is the will of the majority City of Temecula Commission Appointment Application 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 www.cityortemecuIa.org(951)694-6444 Planning Commission aoolication Temecula resident: 8 years and current registered voter NAME: Paul Sonstein OCCUPATION: Military and commercial pilot ADDRESS: _ DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: 196th RS, California Air National Guard EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 1620 Graeber St., March ARB CA 92518 E-MAIL: _—„- EMPLOYER NAME: UPS EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 825 Lotus Ave, Louisville KY 40213 E-MAIL: Educational Background/Degrees: Bachelor of Arts, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1996 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: None List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): California Air National Guard To Whom It May Concern June 6`h 2014 I wish to serve on the Planning Commission because of two reasons: my son, Logan and my daughter, Paige. I want to be directly involved with the future of our city so my children will thrive and prosper. I want Temecula to be a world-class city where we are the example for the rest of California. I am qualified in multiple ways. As a United Parcel Service pilot I understand what it is to be part of a team to get a job done efficiently and safely. A large amount of trust is placed in me to transport cargo in a multimillion-dollar aircraft domestically and internationally. As a commercial pilot, I am part of a crew where everyone's opinion counts. My attention to detail is outstanding and this is directly attributed to flying where a missed detail could mean life or death. I am a Lieutenant Colonel in the California Air National Guard and I have been serving in the Air Force in many different forms for over 18 years. I am currently the Chief of scheduling for the 196"' Reconnaissance Squadron at March ARB in Riverside. This involves managing the readiness of pilots and sensors to keep our unit fully combat qualified to conduct on-going operations in the war against terrorism. When I was qualified to fly the C-17A aircraft, I was repeatedly rated top 10% of 100+ officers. In addition I was consistently ranked#1 out of 10 current operations mission program specialists while managing an 8,000-hr, $100M C-17A Globemaster III budget. The vice president of the United States personally decorated my crew with coveted air medals in 2003 for safely recovering the only C-17A to be hit by enemy fire. As pilot-in- command, I lead our crew to a successful recovery with no loss of life or injury to our crew or the army troops we were carrying. This decoration was later upgraded to the esteemed "Distinguished Flying Cross." In 2011 I volunteered to help the people of Japan after the tsunami ravaged them. As the pilot-in-command, my crew and I braved nuclear fallout to deliver 400K lbs of humanitarian relief cargo. My crew and I were awarded the prestigious "aircrew of the quarter" for our efforts and the people of Japan were very grateful. I understand what it is to dedicate your life to serve others. I know how to work as a team whether it is leading or following. My love for my family and Temecula is great. I would like an opportunity to continue my service to the people of Temecula. I understand that any,or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information foypublic information purposes. Signature: , A7( CQ��f Date: 1.,,-,p b .2-0 City of Temecula May, 27, 2014 Planning Commission Selection Committee 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92592 Subject: City of Temecula Planning Commission Appointment Dear Selection Committee Members, I am writing in support of Lieutenant Colonel, Paul Sonstein USAF related to his interest in and consideration for the open seat on the Temecula Planning Commission. I have known Paul and his family for several years as a friend and neighbor. I believe Paul, throughout his 18 years with the USAF has demonstrated analytical and problem solving skills that would ad depth in the service to the community and Planning Commission. Paul and I have worked together when setting up his new RV and through that experience I found him to be an extremely task oriented individual with the drive and desire centered on the completion of the project at hand. He is well thought of throughout the entire neighborhood and is quick to extend offers of assistance. I would ask that you please give serious consideration to Paul's application for Planning Commission Member and please feel free to contact me if necessary. Sincerely, Roger C iemer Rancho California Water District Board of Directors BOAEW OF EDUCATQN Robert Brown - TEMECULA VALLEY Vincent°Neat Unified School District Or Mien PulSipher Dr.Kr'sti Rutz-Robbins Rick Shafer SUPERINTENDENT timothy Alive June S, 2014 To Whom It May Concern: I am sending this letter of recommendation for my friend and neighbor Mr. Paul Sonstein to recommend him for the planning commission of the City of Temecula. I have known Paul for a few years and find him to be a great family man and a good neighbor and he has a great interest in being involved in his community and giving back some of his time. Mr. Sonstein has 18 years in the Air National Guard and holds a rank of Lt. Coronel he is also a pilot of a Boing 757 for U.P.S: He has a young family and would be a new face with a young energy for the planning commission. Please give him consideration when you make your choice, he has my highest recommendation. (g j„, Bob Brown Member of Board of Trustees Temecula Valley Unified School School District 31350 Rancho Vista Road 1 Temecula,CA 92592!(951)676-2661 June 5, 2014 'i A r.-- 1 I To Whom It May Concern, For the past two years I, Timothy Stack, have had the pleasure of working with Paul Sonstein in a military capacity. Paul and I have worked together in a variety of situations; combat operations, mission planning,coordination/scheduling of unit assets,just to name a few. During this time I have seen Paul work in both stressful situations and situations requiring a large amount of attention to extreme detail. As a sergeant with the Los Angeles Police Department working uniformed patrol, I understand the need for these qualities within my officers, along with the men and women I serve with in the military. I understand Paul is seeking an appointment to the City of Temecula's Planning Commission. It is my expert opinion, with the qualities I have observed in Paul, both of character and competence, he would become a great asset to Temecula, the Planning Commission and the people served by the city. Respcctfu y, 4./...4.4 / Gcc- L — Timothy . Stack Sergeant I, Southwest Division Los Angeles Police Department DEPARTMENT OF THE MR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 163RD RECONAISSANCE WING 1620 GRAEBER STREET,SUITE 6 MARCH AIR FORCE BASE,CALIFORNIA 92518.1631 6 June 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR THE TEMECULA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: 196 RS/CC (Lt Col LaMar) SUBJECT: Letter of Recommendation for Lt Col Sonstein 1. As the commander of the 196th Reconnaissance Squadron, l have had the pleasure of working directly with Lieutenant Colonel Paul Sonstein for several years and have been consistently impressed with his professionalism and positive, "can-do"attitude. A bona fide war hero, Lt Col Sonstein has been decorated for bravery by the Vice President of the United States. After his aircraft was hit by a surface to air missile that nearly blew the wing off, Lt Col Sonstein's prompt,decisive actions and cool-headed decision making saved 16 people and a$200-million aircraft. Outside of the combat arena, Lt Col Sonstein is a consistent top performer with a well-documented history of professional and military excellence. When evaluating candidates for leadership positions, we look for several factors: a history of high achievement, the ability to perform(and lead)under pressure, a positive attitude, a strong work ethic and that elusive "squadron fit"--how well the person's personality meshes with other members of the team. It is when using these criteria that Lt Col Sonstein's strengths place him head and shoulders above his contemporaries. 2. It's not only Lt Cot Sonstein's grace under life-and-death pressure that sets him apart-it's also his integrity,commitment to excellence and contagious positive attitude in normal,day to day situations. He has a"team first"approach that raises the level of performance of all those around him to higher levels. 3. Based on my direct observations of Lt Col Paul Sonstein's performance, I want to pass along my strop est recommendation for him to become a member of the commission. Please contact me at if I can answer any questions or be of any further assistance. EDWARD B. LA MAR, JR., Lt of CA ANG Commander DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE , _ 196th RECONNAISSANCE SQUADRON 1651 GRAEBER ST STE 6C MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE, CA 26 May 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: 196 RS/DO SUBJECT: Letter of Recommendation I. This letter is to express my full support for Paul "Sonny" Sonstein to be selected with your program. I have supervised Paul for almost 2 years and his professionalism and positive attitude set the standard in our flying squadron. When accomplishing the mission, his skill level and attention to detail is among the top one percent of all pilots in the squadron. His dedication and care of the troops downrange ensure the success of our mission. As our officer in charge of Scheduling, he is revamping the way we do business with innovative ideas and improving current procedures. He is well respected by his peers and is a mentor as well. The countless hours he spends with the new pilots in the squadron show the level of dedication he exudes and the service before self that he lives by. His work has been instrumental to ensuring the readiness of our squadron and the satisfaction of our supported teams downrange. Paul is not only a leader in the squadron but balances that with being a dedicated leader in his community. He is a family man with a heart of gold that would be an overwhelming asset with your organization. 2. If additional information is required on this matter, please contact me at and thank you for your consideration. > KRISTIN E. WILLIAMS, LT COL, CA ANG 196RS Director of Operations t+% .'I DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 163 RECONNAISSANCE WING MARCH AIR FORCE BASE, CA 92518-1631 5 June 2014 MEMORANDUM FOR TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: 196RS/A FLIGHT COMMANDER SUBJECT: Letter of Recommendation for Lieutenant Colonel Paul Sonstein, CA ANG 1. It is my pleasure to recommend Lieutenant Colonel Paul Sonstein as a member of the Temecula California Planning Commission. As an 18-year member of the U.S. Air Force, Lt Col Sonstein understands the importance of setting objectives,building a team, and maintaining high standards. 2. Since Lt Col Sonstein joined our squadron over two years ago,he has made an immediate, positive impact. He strives to be the best that he could be with every opportunity that is presented. Whether it is flying a difficult mission,a complicated project or implementing policies and procedures, Lt Col Sonstein is always diligent in his endeavors. Furthermore, Lt Col Sonstein's testament to his family, community and church further prove his qualities of high standards and good moral character, which should make him a good fit for the Temecula Planning Commission. 3. As an upstanding resident of Temecula,CA for the past eight years, Lt Col Sonstein has witnessed the tremendous growth of the Temecula Valley and the Southern California region. As a diligent,talented and competent officer of our nation's military, 1 have no doubt that Lt Col Sonstein will serve the fine people of Temecula well. Additionally, Lt Col Sonstein's calm,and detailed approach to planning will be a tremendous asset to the Temecula Planning Commission. 4. I have served in the military for over 17 years and have seen very few brilliant officers such as Lt Col Sonstein. He is a proven, valuable asset to our Air Force,yet he can be a greater resource to the wonderful community and people of Temecula,CA. I whole-heartedly endorse Lieutenant Colonel Paul Sonstein as a member of the Temecula Planning Commission and I hope that you give him your strongest consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me at LT cvc. CA FENG MA E. A CHER, Lieutenant Colonel, CA ANG 196RS/A Flt CC City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Commission Appointment 1989 www.cityoftemecula.org Application (951)694-6444 tireZEIVEL For proper.consideration; ou must currently be aizesidcnt of the';'.• ...City,of,Temecula and a Regis ered.Voter within the.City;I.imitsof,the JUN 9 4 2014 I' , • . ti..• .Cit of•Tcula-• ti'•• • _ • : Kellee Spillman—Attachment I wish to serve on the Temecula Planning Commission in order to serve the community to which I love to live and work in. My Real Estate/Title Insurance background has given me great insight as to the needs of the community as well as special knowledge regarding zoning and subdivisions as it concerns to any real estate.As I represent and have represented hundreds of buyers in Temecula during the course of my 17 year Real Estate career, I believe I have a great understanding as to the needs of the community as it relates to growth,diversity, safety, schools, employment, hospitality, freeway access,and shopping. Bottom line, I sell homes to those taxpayers who want to live here. I have their ear for the duration of a couple of months and know specifically what they are looking for being everything from basic infrastructure like the New Temecula hospital to School ratings, to Special.assessments. People moving to Temecula are interested in all growth information which is one reason I attend the State of Temecula Address each year. Knowledge of what Temecula has to offer is critical to me as an agent selling Real Estate in Temecula. I would like to utilize what I know to participate in planning the future growth of Temecula. I have served on many committees over the years and am happy to supply references upon request. Thank you for the opportunity! Kellee Beth Solis- Spillman CEO/REO Director/Broker of Reliable Realty Inc. BIO Kellee Beth Spillman, CEO/REO Director/Broker of Reliable Realty Inc., is a leader in the ever changing Real Estate Industry. She is a licensed Real Estate Broker with extensive knowledge in foreclosures,REO dispositions and short sale negotiations. Since joining Reliable Realty Inc, Kellee Spillman has been instrumental in expanding the company and establishing its reputation as one of the top Bank-Owned Foreclosure Brokerages in California. In 2005,Kellee was made partner/President at Reliable Realty. She bought out her partner in 2010 and is now sole owner of Reliable Realty located in Temecula California. Kellee's outside sales career began in I984 but she was introduced to the Real Estate industry in 1992 when she took a position with Orange Coast Title as District Sales Manager. In 1997, Kellee received the Prestigious Sales Person of the Year Award and was then recruited by Home Life Real Estate in Moreno Valley as Sales Manager and Marketing Director for 5 Home Life Offices. Kellee was responsible for leading Home Life out of the red and making it the most profitable branch within the Home Life Franchise network. In 1999 Kellee was recruited by Reliable Realty Inc. located in Murrieta, CA where she practiced Real Estate and became proficient at loans. In 2005 Kellee earned her Broker's license. In 2006 Kellee started Reliable Property Management. Kellee continues to rapidly expand her successful Real Estate Brokerage and develop cutting-edge techniques in the field. Kellee attended MSJC where she received her AS degree in Business then was accepted to University of Redlands School of Business where she received her Bachelor Degree in Business & Management. In addition to the many organizations to which Kellee is involved in, she regularly speaks at public forums and workshops. Such experiences include MT. SAJ,NAHREP- LA, NAHREP— IE. Kellee has recently been asked to speak regarding leadership at the University of Redlands. She most recently served Master of Ceremonies for the NAHREP- LA Installation dinner and recently served as moderator at an REO commercial roundtable event. She has also taught numerous Real Estate classes at Mt. San Jacinto College and has been asked to apply as an instructor. She currently serves on the Real Estate Instruction advisory committee at MSJC. Kellee has sat on numerous committees including the REOMAC Sponsorship Committee. Kellee has sat on the board for the MBA and recently served a 3 year term on the Board of Directors for NAHREP-IE as VP of Corporate Affairs. Kellee has developed very strong professional relationships which have propelled her to become a leader in the Real Estate world. On a personal level, Kellee is committed to community service such as feeding the homeless through Project Touch in Temecula, CA, an organization benefiting the local homeless families. In 2010 Kellee was the recipient of the U.S. Presidents Volunteer Service Award. O l O-I4 AQ5:5 1 RCVD �• ,, City of Temecula . �/►�� � a i t700 Main Street. _. 4. Temecula,CA 92590 Commission Appointment arww.cityoftemecuEa.org App//cat/on '��- ..�-._.- C t9st)sea-saaa v'ECEIVEt9 For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the JUN 10 20111 City of Temecula ii..8 a r .i.,i.aIOCS DEPT. Pleas, Chock EA,e, V Planning Community Services Public Traffic Sefety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 4947 Are you a City Registered Voter? *6 NAME: — OCCUPATION: ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:- ENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: EMPLOYER ADDRESS: E-MAIL — Educational Background/Degrees: List any City or County Boerd, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: List any organizations to which you belong(professional, technical,volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may ettach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation end/or references ere encouraged.) I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Information for public Information purposes. Slgnat .f//�4', Date: (Q�' Id ! 1 Please mail or retur 0:City of T�Ia, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE t Lanae Turley-Trejo June 9, 2014 Planning Commissioner application Educational Background---Bachelor of Science Physical Education,minore---Spanish and Sociology, Brigham Young University;Amerioan Sign Language/Englieh Interpreter Training Program, Palomar College Organizations: Elementary, Middle School and High School FTA(President and Treasurer),Council PTA(President), Citizen Scholarship Foundation(President), .Murrieta/Temecula Valley Interfaith Council (Outreach), Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Sainte Public Affairs Council(Director), Better Together of Temecula Valley Council....instrumental in establiehing these community events: Spooled Games,FAM Nights, Nativity Festival,Family First and Crystal Apple Awards,Helping Hands, Better Together Benefit Concert The reason I am applying for the Planning Commission: I love this comms n ty and would like to eerve where I can make a differenoe. It is important to me to keep the quality of life that we have in Temecula,based on family and community values. The master plan of this community will be important to me in the decisions I make as Planning Commissioner. The qualities/skills I have that qualify me for this position are: integrity, paselon, enthusiasm, dependability, leadership skills, commitment,vision, people skills, and I have volunteered In this community in many different capacities anc have been an informed and voting citizen for almost 27 years. Personal information: married for 34 years to my best friend, raised four sons,have two daughters-in-law and eix grandchil.dren...,best part of my Biel References: Chuck Washington Kevin Osborne *attached: three letters ofreoommendation C71?_//\-\. 130.8E117 Of EDUCATION Robert Brown TEMECULA VALLEY Vincent o'Neei Unified School District Dr Allen Puesipiher Dr.POO Ruu•Robbirte Rick Shafer SUPERINTENDENT Timothy Ritter r une 8, 2014o Whom It May Concern: is with great pleasure that I write this letter on behalf of Mrs. Lanae Turley-Trejo for the osition of Planning Commissioner for the City of Temecula. I have known and worked with anae in a variety of capacities over the past ten years and feel qualified to speak to specific rengths and abilities that I feel uniquely qualify her for this position and provide her with the perience and skill set to be highly successful. Iy professional relationship with Lanae is based primarily on her personal commitment to rving our education community. Our paths first crossed as a result of her involvement in PTA. e served as an officer(twice president and once treasure)at one of our elementary,middle d high schools over the years. She then took on the responsibility of becoming our District ouncil PTA President which encompasses 27 schools and thousands of members. Lanae also ve her time to work with and support the Temecula Citizens Scholarship Foundation for ten ars(twice as President). This organization raises hundred of thousands of dollars in holarship money from local businesses and community members and distributes these monies the students in our school district at an annual event. This is an amazing Iabor of love and nefits our community in such a significant way. here I have really gotten to see Lanae shine and truly understand her commitment,work ethic d public spirit has been in her role as Director of Public Affairs for the LDS Church,a sition she held for ten years. In this capacity Lanae played a significant role in the tablishment of several community based events and recognitions that have stood the test of e and are now part of the Temecula culture. Among these are the Nativity Festival, the ystal Apple Awards(annual recognition of teachers who have made a significant impact on dent learning and social/moral development), Family First Awards (annual recognition of mmunity members who balance community commitment and family in an inspirational way), ecial Games, and Helping Hands(community service). nae has established herself as someone who loves her community and is willing to make the mmitment to make things happen. Her dedication speaks for itself and her selfless leadership an inspiration for all who work with her. I know of no other person who has done so much for city of Temecula, its community members, our students and teachers,and asked for nothing return. She understands how to move people with a vision and get the job done, which I uld think are two outstanding qualities for someone serving in the Planning Commissioner sition. This is why I am endorsing the application of Lanae Turley-Trejo for the position of 31350 Rancho Vista Road 1 Temecula,CA 92592/(951)676-2661 } BOARD OF EDUCATION Imin J./ Robert Brown TEMECULA VALLEY Vincent O'Neal Unified School District Or.Allen Pulsipher Dr.Krtstl Rutz-Robbins Rick Shafer SUPERINTENDENT Timothy Ritter Planning Commissioner for the City of Temecula and ask that you give her your most careful consideration. If I can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, ck.64201„2 Timothy Ritter Superintendent 31350 Rancho Vista Road/Temecula,CA 92592/(951)676-2661 May 28,2104 Dear Planning Commission Subcommittee: It is with great pleasure that I recommend Lanae Turley-Trejo as a Planning Commissioner for the City of Temecula. I have had the opportunity to have known and worked with Lanae for more than 20 years. Lanae has been actively involved in the Temecula Valley Unified School District related to the PTA and many other activities that strongly support our local school system. Lanae is also actively involved in supporting her local church,and has organized many activities that support non-profit organizations that give back to our community. Lanae is someone who truly loves Temecula,and will give her best efforts to preserve and protect the quality of life that we have all come to know as Temecula. Please feel free to contact me at if you would like any additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Ix Shawn Nelson June 6,2014 Letter of Recommendation Temecula Planning Commission Sub-Committee My name is Tracy E Ham. I have been a resident of Temecula since 1988. I am a financial advisor,by profession, and also serve as the President of the Temecula California Stake of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.I am writing to recommend Lanae Turley-Trejo for the position of Planning Commissioner with the City of Temecula. I have known Lanae for over 25 years and consider her a friend.She has been involved as an active community member in helping the City of Temecula and its schools to be the wonderful community that we all love.She has been active in PTA,the Citizens Scholarship Foundation,and many other efforts in the community. Lanae and her family have been role models for the city and its culture as a family oriented community.She served for more than 10 years as the leader of the public affairs council for the local congregations of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints and is a well respected and influential member of that organization.She served with distinction in this assignment and has many friends within many denominations as well as community,business,and City leaders who respect her leadership and work in this area. Lanae is someone who loves her community,not only in word, but has been very active in making Temecula a better place to live.She has been very generous with her time and is extremely capable and committed to the community she loves.The City of Temecula would be fortunate to have someone of her caliber to be a member of this commission.She would be a dedicated force for good in this community. I give her my highest recommendation_ Respectfully, T . Ham ss- •''" City of Temecula _ P 41000 Main Street Commission Appointment F .', • if Temecula,CA 92590 19A� www.cityottemecula.org Application (951)694-6444 For proper consideration,you must currently be a resident of the City of Temecula and a Registered Voter within the City Limits of the 4..1Y ti 8 2014 City of Temecula — CAT a CLESdrn:KikP r. Please Chock Orw >/ Planning Community Services Public Traffic Safety Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident a Are you a City Registered Voter?_11F-)3 'r�54 V D 'l A LJA4�Q0 1 rowtat 1 SS>Gt7 NAME: OCCUPATION: G}A/12414 Mt) 1 ADDRESS: i DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE. i EMPLOYER NAME: 111'44 A477c) Cf 59-,J71 LI.M.e 100 SCI-Kr-Z 1+2.0SE CA,tl'1tC E-0 EMPLOYER ADDRESS: giftri.4 q ReA.,4 4 gZ07f) E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: t-{ g. EA3C E - EUS/ 70iW4 (4,0Eor,yr ch ASTEMS 49F 8USftkJa 4 y" IuMTV-A c AJ List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: t NOL E List any organizations to which you belong (professional,technical,volunteer groups, non-profit organizations, service clubs, etc.): Q4 Li f2 ,()/A -Pi(54L ! rt(/r1/4Sh A ssoc.l tv-nom , 01-Li rc2olui A G601. /aJV 774 ATC24 SSOC-i OA)) AtATToichA4.. 1 Le Scar,)- 4SS<xth i7qO) Crnek T} 7)4 C4-04-erf-t soF A Lah40ifS1yo01 State why you wish to serve on this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific.(You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Letters of recommendation and/or references are encouraged.) (SCE AIDAC4 c ) I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information f• •u• mation • oi . „gim Signature: ��L WeftDate: 5- 2S-- Q0/11 •ease mail or re um to:City• -emecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE May 25,2014 Regarding my Application for Appointment to the Temecula Planning Commission: I have been a Temecula resident for over ten years. In my short time as a resident of this region,my family and I have seen great changes in the city,most of them wonderful and for the maximum benefit of residents and visitors to the region. Temecula is an extraordinary place to live and I would be honored by the opportunity to serve on the Temecula Planning Commission, helping to guide the city's growth and development. In 2012,I retired from the State of California after a thirty-six year career in municipal and state law enforcement. I now serve as the Gaming Commission Chairman for the Santa Ysabel Indian Tribe located in San Diego County, helping the Tribe in their efforts to develop self-sufficiency through economic development. I am also an adjunct faculty member of the College of Criminal Justice for the University of Phoenix,facilitating classes in Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. I have an excellent grasp of the inner-workings of government and I have effectively worked with multi- cultural populations my entire career. I was effective as a state law enforcement manager because always maintained an open mind and was willing to consider all perspectives before making an informed decision. I believe that the basis for effective business interactions is mutual respect and understanding the issues from the perspective of all parties involved in the discussion. Thank you for your consideration of my request for appointment. Sincerely, Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager • CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl-Olson, City Clerk DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointment PREPARED BY: Shelley Pollak, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint one applicant to serve a full three-year term on the Planning Commission through June 15, 2017. BACKGROUND: The term of Commissioner Carl Carey expired on June 15, 2014. The City Clerk's office has followed the Council's established procedure for filling Commission vacancies by advertising the opening in the local newspaper. Notices were also posted at various locations within the City and on the City's web page. When the deadline was reached for accepting applications, the applications were forwarded to the committee comprised of Mayor Edwards and Council Member Naggar for review and recommendation. Eighteen applications were received for the one vacancy. Both Mayor Edwards and Council Member Naggar have recommended to appoint Lana'e Turley-Trejo to serve full a three-year term through June 15, 2017. All applicants are registered voters and live within the city limits of the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 22 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager Rier- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: 2014 Community Opinion Survey Report PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the 2014 Community Opinion Survey Report. BACKGROUND: The 2014 Community Opinion Survey Research Report is a study designed to provide a statistically reliable understanding of citizen satisfaction, priorities, and concerns on a variety of services that the City provides. True North Research, Inc. is a full- service survey research firm dedicated to providing public agencies with a clear understanding of the values, perceptions, priorities, and concerns of their residents and customers. True North designed the research plan and conducted this study to: •Identify key issues of concern for residents; •Measure residents' overall satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide municipal services; •Evaluate perceptions of issues such as traffic and economic development; •Determine the effectiveness of the City's communication efforts; and •Collect additional background and demographic data that is relevant to understanding residents' perceptions, needs and interests. The Community Opinion Survey is also an integral part of the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) process. The survey results help to ensure that the City's priorities and goals remain aligned with citizen input and the QLMP. As community priorities change, the QLMP can be adjusted to reflect those changes. It's recommended that the survey be repeated every few years to ensure that the City is working on the most current priorities and goals of our citizens. Previous surveys conducted for the City by third party consultants relied on traditional telephone recruitment and data collection. However, much has changed in recent years in terms of caller ID screening and the proportion of households that have given up their land lines for unpublished cellphones. Based on these trends, True North transitioned to an updated survey methodology that combines mail and telephone recruiting strategies with telephone and online data collection to ensure accessibility and the most statistically reliable sample. True North notes that a change in methodology creates a methodological break, which means that the results of the 2014 survey are not directly comparable to past survey results. Moving forward, the 2014 Survey can be used as a baseline for future surveys. A few highlights are provided below: Quality of Life - •95% rated the quality of life in Temecula as excellent or good. •When asked what residents most liked about living in Temecula, the most common response was the City's small town feel and community involvement among residents mentioned by 29% of respondents, followed by a low crime rate (22%), cleanliness of the City (21%) and quality of education (10.6%). •When asked what one change the City could make to improve the quality of life in Temecula, reducing traffic congestion was the most common response (20%), followed by improving/repairing roads (10%). It is also notable that one-quarter of the respondents said that either (1) they could not think of anything to change (17%) or (2) do not change anything (7.9%). City Services - •93% indicated that they were satisfied with the City's performance in providing municipal services. Traffic - •Despite traffic congestion remaining the #1 issue for residents, 65% indicated that they are generally satisfied with the City's efforts to improve traffic circulation. Spending Priorities - •The top priorities for future City spending: Making infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation & providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the city. City -Resident Communication - •78% of residents reported being satisfied with the City's efforts to communicate with them. The main source of information that citizens learn about Temecula is tied between the City newsletter at 37% and the internet in general (not City website) at 37%, City website at 24%, social media at 9%, flyers/brochures at 8%, eblasts/emails at 6% and community events at 4%. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 2014 Community Opinion Survey Research Report COMMUNITY OPINION STUDY SURVEY REPORT PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA N) T1RUENORTH ,I R ESE A R C H 741 GARDEN VIEW COURT, SUITE 208 ENCINITAS CA 92024 760.632.9900 WWW.TN-RESEARCH.COM AUGUST 26, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents i List of Tables iii List of Figures iv Introduction 1 Purpose of Study 1 Overview of Methodology 1 Methodological Changes & Comparisons to Prior Studies 2 Statistical Significance 2 Organization of Report 2 Disclaimer 3 About True North 3 Just the Facts 4 Quality of Life 4 City Services 4 Community Facilities & Programs 5 Traffic 5 Economic Development 5 Spending Priorities 6 Schools & Old Town 6 Staff & Council 6 City -resident Communication 6 Conclusions 8 Quality of Life 12 Quality of Life 12 Question 2 12 Factors Contributing to Quality of Life 13 Question 3 14 Ways to Improve Quality of Life 15 Question 4 15 City Services 17 Overall Satisfaction 17 Question 5 17 Specific Services 18 Question 6 19 Question 7 19 Performance Needs & Priorities 22 Community Facilities & Programs 25 Community Facility Household Visits 25 Question 8 25 Community Facility Ratings 26 Question 9 26 Rec Program or Special Event Household Participation 26 Question 10 27 Question 11 27 Traffic 28 Traffic Circulation 28 Question 12 28 Satisfaction With Efforts to Improve Circulation 29 Question 13 29 Economic Development 31 Question 14 31 Question 15 32 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 i Question 16 33 Spending Priorities 34 Question 17 34 Schools & Old Town 36 Quality of Education 36 Question 18 36 Old Town Temecula Visits 37 Question 19 37 Question 20 38 Staff & Council 39 City Leadership 39 Question 21 39 City Staff 40 Question 22 40 Question 23 41 Question 24 42 City -Resident Communication 43 Overall Satisfaction 43 Question 25 43 Information Sources 44 Question 26 45 City Council Meeting Viewership 46 Question 27 46 Background & Demographics 48 Methodology 49 Questionnaire Development 49 Programming & Pre -Test 49 Sample, Recruiting & Data Collection 49 Statistical Margin of Error 50 Data Processing 51 Rounding 51 Questionnaire & Toplines 52 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 ji LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Like Most About Living in Temecula: 2014 to 2000 14 Table 2 Changes to Improve Temecula: 2014 to 2007 16 Table 3 Satisfaction With Services: 2014 to 2000 21 Table 4 Needs & Priority Matrix 23 Table 5 Household Community Facility Visit: 2014 to 2007 26 Table 6 Spending Project Priorities: 2014 to 2007 35 Table 7 Agreement With Statements About City: 2014 & 201 1 40 Table 8 Rating City Staff: 2014 to 2007 41 Table 9 Top City Information Sources: 2014 to 2007 45 Table 10 Top City Information Sources by Age 46 Table 11 City Council Viewership in Past 12 Months: 2014 to 2007 47 Table 12 Demographics of Sample: 2014 to 2007 48 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 1 11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Quality of Life 12 Figure 2 Quality of Life by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Home Ownership Status 13 Figure 3 Quality of Life by Regularly Commute Outside City & Age 13 Figure 4 Like Most About Living in Temecula 14 Figure 5 Changes to Improve Temecula 15 Figure 6 Overall Satisfaction 17 Figure 7 Overall Satisfaction by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Home Ownership Status 18 Figure 8 Overall Satisfaction by Regularly Commute Outside City & Age 18 Figure 9 Importance of Services 19 Figure 10 Satisfaction With Services 20 Figure 11 Resident Service Needs 24 Figure 12 Household Community Facility Visit 25 Figure 13 Rating Park & Recreation Facilities 26 Figure 14 Household Participation in Recreational Program or Special Event: 2014 to 2007 27 Figure 15 Quality of Recreation Programs & Special Events: 2014 to 2007 27 Figure 16 Rating Traffic Circulation: 2014 to 2000 28 Figure 17 Rating Traffic Circulation by Area of Residence 29 Figure 18 Satisfaction With Traffic Circulation Improvement Efforts: 2014 to 2007 29 Figure 19 Satisfaction With Traffic Circulation Improvement Efforts by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Regularly Commute Outside City 30 Figure 20 Satisfaction With Traffic Circulation Improvement Efforts by Gender & Age 30 Figure 21 Desire Additional Retail Stores in Temecula: 2014 to 2014 31 Figure 22 Desire Additional Retail Stores in Temecula by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Regularly Commute Outside City 31 Figure 23 Desire Additional Retail Stores in Temecula by Gender & Age 32 Figure 24 Additional Stores Desired in Temecula 32 Figure 25 Interest in Whole Foods Market 33 Figure 26 Interest in Whole Foods Market by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Regularly Commute Outside City 33 Figure 27 Interest in Whole Foods Market by Gender & Age 33 Figure 28 Spending Project Priorities 34 Figure 29 Quality of Education in Public Schools: 2014 to 2007 36 Figure 30 Quality of Education in Public Schools by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Age 36 Figure 31 Frequency of Old Town Temecula Visits: 2014 to 2007 37 Figure 32 Rating Old Town Temecula: 2014 & 201 1 38 Figure 33 Rating Old Town Temecula by Age & Frequency of Old Town Visits 38 Figure 34 Agreement With Statements About City 39 Figure 35 Contact With City Staff in Past 12 Months: 2014 to 2000 40 Figure 36 Contact With City Staff in Past 12 Months by Area of Residence, Home Ownership Status & Age 40 Figure 37 Rating City Staff 41 Figure 38 Contact With Council in Past 12 Month: 2014 to 2007 42 Figure 39 Contact With Council in Past 12 Months by Area of Residence, Home Ownership Status & Age 42 Figure 40 Satisfaction With Communication: 2014 to 2000 43 Figure 41 Satisfaction With Communication by Years in Temecula, Area of Residence & Home Ownership Status 44 Figure 42 Satisfaction With Communication by Gender & Age 44 Figure 43 City Information Sources 45 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 t, iv Figure 44 City Council Viewership in Past 12 Months 46 Figure 45 Maximum Margin of Error 51 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 v 1 NTRODUCTION Located in southwest Riverside County, the City of Temecula is known for championship golf courses, hot-air ballooning, and award-winning wineries. Incorporated in 1989 and currently home to an estimated 105,208 residents,' the City has a team of full- and part-time employees that provides services through more than a dozen departments, agencies, and programs, includ- ing Building and Safety, City Clerk's Office, City Manager's Office, Code Enforcement, Commu- nity Services, Economic Development, Finance, Fire, Human Resources, Information Systems, Planning, Police, and Public Works. To monitor its progress in meeting residents' needs, the City engages its residents on a daily basis and receives periodic subjective feedback regarding its performance. Although these infor- mal feedback mechanisms are a valuable source of information for the City in that they provide timely and accurate information about the opinions of specific residents, it is important to recog- nize that they do not necessarily provide an accurate picture of the community as a whole. For the most part, informal feedback mechanisms rely on the resident to initiate feedback, which creates a self-selection bias. The City receives feedback only from those residents who are moti- vated enough to initiate the feedback process. Because these residents tend to be those who are either very pleased or very displeased with the service they have received, their collective opin- ions are not necessarily representative of the City's resident population as a whole. `•T' The motivation for the current study was to design and employ a methodology that would avoid the self-selection bias noted above and thereby provide the City with a statistically reliable understanding of its residents' satisfaction, priorities, and concerns as they relate to services and facilities provided by the City. Ultimately, the survey results and anal- yses presented in this report will provide Council and staff with information that can be used to make sound, strategic decisions in a variety of areas, including service improvements and enhancements, measuring and tracking internal performance, budgeting, policy, and planning. To assist it in this effort, the City selected True North Research to design the research plan and conduct the study. Broadly defined, the study was designed to: Identify key issues of concern for residents. Measure residents' overall satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide municipal services, as well as their satisfaction with a variety of specific services. • Evaluate perceptions of issues such as traffic, economic development, and education. • Determine the effectiveness of the City's communication efforts. Collect additional background and demographic data that is relevant to understanding resi- dents' perceptions, needs, and interests. A full description of the methodology used for this study is included later in this report (see Methodology on page 49). In brief, the study used a combination of mailed invitations and phone calls to recruit participation in the survey from 402 adult residents selected at random from Temecula residences. Respondents were provided with the option to participate in the survey by telephone or online. Interviews were conducted between April 25 and May 8, 2014 and averaged 20 minutes in length. 1. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 201 2 Population Estimates. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 1 (METHODOLOGICAL CHANGES & COMPARISONS TO Plook s I ULAES This is not the first statistically reliable `resident satisfaction' survey conducted for the City—similar studies were conducted in 2000, 2007, and 201 1 . Because of the natural interest in tracking the City's performance in meeting the evolving needs of its residents, where appropriate the results of the current study are compared with the results of identical questions included in previous studies. It must be noted, however, that because the methodology of the 2014 survey was updated and is substantially different than that used in 201 1, differences between the current and prior studies can reflect the change in methodology as well as possible changes in opinion. In recent years, much has changed in terms of how the public receives information, the accessi- bility of residents through traditional recruiting methods, and their willingness to participate in community surveys. In addition to an increase in the proportion of households that have given up their land lines and only use unpublished cell phones, the prevalence of caller ID and similar technologies has led to a substantial rise in call screening behaviors—where individuals will not answer the phone unless they recognize the phone number. In combination, these factors create a situation where a growing percentage of households are simply unreachable if one relies solely on telephone -based sampling, recruiting, and data collection techniques. Recognizing the aforementioned developments and the challenges they pose to producing sta- tistically reliable results, True North recommended that the City of Temecula transition to a new methodology for the 2014 survey that utilized multiple recruiting methods (mailed invitations and telephone calls) as well as multiple data collection methods (telephone and online). Although transitioning to this new methodology improves the overall reliability and comparabil- ity of the City's resident survey moving forward, it does create a methodological break in the time -series. For this reason, although comparisons between the 201 1 and 2014 surveys are pos- sible, it's important to keep in mind that a difference in the survey results could be caused by a change in public opinion, be an artifact of a change in the methodology, or a mixture of both.2 TAT( TIC AI_ SIC NIEICA_NC'' With the above caveat noted, the reader will find that many of the figures and tables in this report present the results of questions asked in 2014 alongside the results found in the prior surveys for identical questions. In such cases, True North con- ducted the appropriate tests of statistical significance to identify statistically significant changes between the 2011 and 2014 surveys. Statistically significant differences within response catego- ries over time are denoted by the t symbol which appears in the figure next to the appropriate response value for 2014. r,or "r"'` This report is designed to meet the needs of readers who prefer a summary of the findings as well as those who are interested in the details of the results. For those who seek an overview of the findings, the sections titled just the Facts and Conclusions are for you. They provide a summary of the most important factual findings of the survey in bul- let -point format and a discussion of their implications. For the interested reader, this section is followed by a more detailed question -by -question discussion of the results from the survey by topic area (see Table of Contents), as well as a description of the methodology employed for col - 2. A visual format survey (online component) also has a tendency to produce more graduated responses as par- ticipants can see the entire response scale rather than having to recall the scale/rely on their memory when answering questions. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 2 lecting and analyzing the data. And, for the truly ambitious reader, the questionnaire used for the interviews is contained at the back of this report, and a complete set of crosstabulations for the survey results is contained in Appendix A, which is bound separately. "r'-" "'+ The statements and conclusions in this report are those of the authors (Dr. Timothy McLarney and Richard Sarles) at True North Research, Inc. and not necessarily those of the City of Temecula. Any errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors. AKOU I 1 RUE NOR I H True North is a full-service survey research firm that is dedicated to providing public agencies with a clear understanding of the values, perceptions, priorities and concerns of their residents and customers. Through designing and implementing scientific sur- veys, focus groups and one-on-one interviews, as well as expert interpretation of the findings, True North helps its clients to move with confidence when making strategic decisions in a variety of areas—such as planning, policy evaluation, performance management, organizational devel- opment, establishing fiscal priorities, and developing effective public information campaigns. During their careers, Dr. McLarney (President) and Mr. Sarles (Principal Researcher) have designed and conducted over 800 survey research studies for public agencies, including more than 300 studies for California municipalities and special districts. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 3 JUST THE F ACTS The following is an outline of the main factual findings from the survey. For the reader's conve- nience, we have organized the findings according to the section titles used in the body of this report. Thus, if you would like to learn more about a particular finding, simply turn to the appro- priate report section. The overwhelming majority of respondents shared favorable opinions of the quality of life in Temecula, with 53% reporting it is excellent and 43% stating it is good. Just 3% of residents indicated the quality of life in the City is fair, and less than 1% used poor or very poor to describe quality of life in the City. When asked what residents most liked about living in Temecula, the most common response was the City's small town feel and community involvement among residents, mentioned by 29% of respondents. Low crime rate (22%), the cleanliness of the City (21%), quality of local schools and education (14%), proximity to areas and attractions outside the City (1 1%), and the weather (10%) were also popular responses as to what residents most like about living in Temecula. When asked what one thing the City could change to make Temecula a better place to live, approximately one-quarter of respondents said they could not think of anything to change (17%) or that no changes were needed (8%). Among specific improvements, reducing traffic congestion was mentioned most frequently (20%), followed by improving and repairing roads (10%), improving parks and recreation services and facilities (9%), limiting growth and development (9%), improving police protection and public safety (7%), and attracting employers and businesses to the City (6%). CITY SERVICE!; The vast majority (93%) of Temecula residents indicated they were either very (53%) or some- what (40%) satisfied with the City's efforts to provide municipal services. Only 4% were very or somewhat dissatisfied, and another 3% were unsure. Residents were asked to rate the importance of 24 specific services provided by the City of Temecula. Overall, maintaining a low crime rate was the most important of the services tested (98% extremely or very important), followed providing fire protection and prevention services (93%), and providing emergency paramedic services (91%). The survey also asked about satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide the same 24 ser- vices. Although residents were generally satisfied with all services tested, they were most satisfied with the City's efforts to provide reliable garbage and recycling services (99% very or somewhat satisfied), provide emergency paramedic services (98%), provide fire protection and prevention services (98%), satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities (98%), and provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities (97%). City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 4 COMMUNITY FACILITIES & PROGRAMS Nine out of ten (91% of) respondents reported that someone in their household had visited a park or open space area in Temecula during the 12 months prior to the survey. Eight -in -ten (79% of) households had visited the Temecula Public Library, and about seven - in -ten (68%) had visited a City -operated recreation or sports facility. A smaller percentage of households had visited the Temecula Community Theater in Old Town (46%), the Civic Center (44%), the Children's Museum (31%), the History Museum (27%), and the Senior Center (14%) in the past year. All respondents were asked to rate the overall quality, safety, accessibility, and appearance of Temecula's parks and recreation facilities. An overwhelming majority of residents rated each of the four dimensions as excellent or good: overall quality (92%), safety (89%), accessi- bility (92%), and appearance (94%). About half (52%) of Temecula households had participated in a recreational program or spe- cial event offered by the City in the past year. Of those residing in households that had participated in a recreational program or special event, nearly all (97%) rated the quality their quality as excellent (60%) or good (37%), 3% rated them as fair, and no one rated them poor or very poor. Approximately one-quarter (23%) of residents rated overall traffic circulation as poor or very poor. Traffic circulation on major streets received similar ratings, with 27% citing it as poor or very poor. Traffic circulation in residential areas was viewed much more positively, with only 4% of respondents indicating it is poor or very poor. Overall, 65% of residents indicated they were very (25%) or somewhat (40%) satisfied with the City's efforts to improve traffic circulation by improving roads and intersections, timing traffic signals, and other measures, whereas 33% were very (1 3%) or somewhat (20%) dissat- isfied. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Half (50%) of residents indicated that there are stores they patronize outside the City that they would like to have available in Temecula. Among residents who indicated they desired additional stores, the most common mention was Nordstrom, named by one-third (33%) of respondents. Other common mentions were: clothing stores (12%), Whole Foods Market (9%), sporting goods and outdoor recreation stores (8%), high-end department stores (7%), Cheesecake Factory (6%), Fry's Electronics (6%), and large discount retail and warehouse stores (5%). When asked specifically about interest in having a Whole Foods Market located in Temecula, 39% of respondents said they were very interested, 19% said they were somewhat interested, and 10% said they were only slightly interested. One quarter (25%) of residents surveyed were not interested, and 7% were not sure. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 5 SPENDING PRIORITIES When provided with fourteen projects that are candidates for future City spending and asked to indicate the priority they would assign to each, making infrastructure improve- ments to improve traffic circulation was assigned the highest priority, followed by providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City, attracting and/or expanding insti- tutions of higher learning such as a college or university, expanding services and programs for people with special needs, and acquiring and protecting open space and natural habitat areas in and around the City. ULiu i )vvi More than three-quarters (76%) of residents felt that, in general, the quality of education in Temecula was excellent (40%) or good (37%). Six percent (6%) cited the quality of education as fair, 2% said poor, and 2% very poor. A significant portion (1 5%) of respondents were not sure of the quality of education and thus did not provide an opinion. When asked how frequently they visit Old Town Temecula, about one-quarter (26%) of resi- dents said they visit at least once per week, and another 26% said they visit the area two to three times per month. One-quarter (25%) said once per month, and 21% indicated that they visit less than once per month. Only 2% of residents said they never visit the Old Town area. Almost nine -in -ten respondents said their Old Town Temecula experiences were excellent (42%) or good (44%). Twelve percent (12%) said their experiences in Old Town were fair, and less than 1% said poor or very poor. STAFF & COUNT'' Among residents who provided an opinion, 90% agreed with the statements, 1 trust the City of Temecula and The City manages its finances well. Eight -seven percent (87%) agreed that the City is responsive, and 82% agreed that the City listens to residents when making impor- tant decisions. Thirty-two percent (32%) of residents indicated they had contact with City staff in the 12 months prior to the interview. Among residents in contact with staff in the past 12 months, 92% felt that City staff mem- bers were courteous, 93% said they were professional, 90% said they were helpful, and 93% considered staff to be knowledgeable. Eleven percent (11%) of residents indicated they had been in contact with a Council member in the 12 months prior to the interview. CITY -RESIDENT COMMUNICATION Over three-quarters (78%) of respondents indicated they were satisfied with City efforts to communicate with residents through newsletters, the Internet, social media, and other means. The remaining respondents were either dissatisfied with the City's efforts in this respect (1 2%), unsure of their opinion (10%), or preferred not to answer (1%). City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 6 The most frequently -cited sources for City information, each mentioned by 37% of respon- dents, were the City Newsletter and the Internet in general. Other popular sources were the City's website (24%), the Press Enterprise (16%) and Valley News (14%) newspapers, and friends, family, and associates (1 3%). In the 12 months prior to the survey, 28% of residents had viewed a Council Meeting through at least one of the three available methods. Specifically, one -in -five (22%) residents had viewed a Council Meeting on television, 9% had attended a Council Meeting in person, and 3% had viewed a meeting via the Internet. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 7 CONCLUSIONS As noted in the Introduction, this study was designed to provide the City of Temecula with a sta- tistically reliable understanding of its residents' satisfaction, priorities and needs as they relate to services and facilities provided by the City. As such, it can provide the City with information needed to make sound, strategic decisions in a variety of areas, including service improvements and enhancements, measuring and tracking internal performance, budgeting, and planning. Whereas subsequent sections of this report are devoted to conveying the detailed results of the survey, in this section we attempt to 'see the forest through the trees' and note how the collec- tive results of the survey answer some of the key questions that motivated the research. The following conclusions are based on the True North's interpretations of the results, as well as the firm's collective experience conducting hundreds of similar studies for cities throughout the State. How well is the City per- forming in meeting the needs of Temecula resi- dents? Temecula residents continue to be quite satisfied with the City's efforts to provide municipal services and facilities, as well as the quality of life in the City. The vast majority (93%) of residents surveyed said they were satisfied with the City's overall performance in providing municipal services, which is similar to the 92% overall satisfaction score recorded in 2011. The high level of satisfaction expressed with the City's performance in general was also mirrored in residents' assessments of the City's perfor- mance in providing specific services. For 19 of 24 service areas tested, the City is meeting or exceeding the needs and expectations of at least 80% of its residents (see Figure 11 on page 24)—and for almost half the City is meeting the needs of at least 90% of residents. The City's performance in providing municipal services has also contrib- uted to a high quality of life for residents. Almost all (95% of) residents surveyed rated the quality of life as excellent or good. This sentiment was widespread, with at least nine -in -ten respondents in every identified demographic subgroup rating the quality of life in Temecula as excellent or good. When asked what they liked most about the Temecula, the City's low crime rate, and its appearance and cleanliness were among the top mentions. To quote one resident: / love the upkeep and maintenance, everything is beautiful and handled with pride...I'm impressed that the City is so well managed yet does not simply try to maintain its excellence, but strives to better serve the community each year. And to underscore this point, it must be noted that when asked about desired changes to improve Temecula, one-quarter of residents surveyed said they could not think of anything to change or that no changes were needed. To the extent that the survey results can be viewed as a report card on the City's performance, Temecula receives A's and just a few B's for all service areas. When compared with more than 200 similar studies for City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 8 Where should the City focus its efforts in the future? California municipalities conducted by the Principals at True North, the results found in this study place the City of Temecula comfortably within the top tier in terms of service performance and overall quality of life. Perhaps the most important recommendation, and one that is occasion- ally overlooked in customer satisfaction research, is for the City to recog- nize the many things that it does well and to focus on continuing to perform at a high level in these areas. As noted throughout this report, residents were generally pleased with the City's efforts to provide ser- vices and facilities, and have a positive opinion of the City's performance in most areas. The top priority for the City should thus be to do what it takes to maintain the quality of services that it currently provides. However, as the City continues to strive for improvement, the results of this study do suggest opportunities to further bolster resident satisfac- tion. Considering the detailed list of services and their respective priority status for future City attention provided in the body of this report (see Performance Needs & Priorities on page 22), residents' verbatim responses about ways that the City can improve the quality of life in the City (see Figure 5 on page 1 5), as well as residents' stated priorities for future city funding (see Figure 28 on page 34), the top candidates for the City's attention are: coordinating traffic signals and making infrastruc- ture improvements to improve traffic circulation, providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City, acquiring and protecting open space and natural habitat areas in and around the City and manag- ing residential growth, improving and repairing roads, and attracting and or expanding institutions of higher learning such as a college or uni- versity. ni- versity. Having recommended that the City focus on these areas, it is equally important to note that the appropriate strategy for improving resident satisfaction would likely be a combination of focused communication and actual service improvements. That is, in some cases service improve- ments are needed to raise satisfaction with the City's performance. In other cases, particularly those that involve policies affecting services and facilities which are not readily apparent, the key may instead be to com- municate better with residents about current efforts and future plans with respect to a particular service area. It may be, for example, that some residents are simply not aware of the City's ongoing economic development efforts to attract employers and jobs, and residents are reacting more to sluggish national and regional economic environments that make weekly headlines. Choosing the appropriate balance of service improvements and efforts to raise public awareness will be a key to maintaining and improving satisfaction in the short- and long-term. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 9 How well is the City com- The recommendations in the previous paragraph regarding public infor- municating with Temec- mation are underscored by residents' current levels of satisfaction with ula residents? the City's efforts to communicate with them through newsletters, the Internet, social media, and other means. Although the City of Temecula generally does a good job communicating with residents with 77% indi- cating satisfaction, the intensity of satisfaction was not strong (34% very satisfied). And less than half of all respondents mentioned the City Newsletter (37%), City website (24%), or City emails, flyers, and direct mail (16%) as their preferred source for city information. Despite a mod- est positive trend seen across the past three studies, the findings of the 2014 study suggest that communication should continue to be a key area of focus in the coming years. In True North's experience, a high level of satisfaction with a city's com- munication efforts is generally associated with and likely caused by a greater reliance among residents on city -sponsored sources of informa- tion such as newsletters, websites, and related publications. In the cur- rent study, as many residents mentioned the Internet in general as did the City's Newsletter for their source of City information. Local newspa- pers, such as the Press Enterprise, Valley News, and Californian, in sum were also mentioned almost as frequently as the Newsletter. Of course, residents' reliance on secondary sources for city information limits the City's ability to shape the stories and information that resi- dents receive and prevents the City from targeting its messages to spe- cific demographic subgroups (e.g., households with teenagers, seniors), which ultimately decreases satisfaction with city -resident communication overall. As importantly, the City does not receive "credit" for outreaching and communicating with residents when they find themselves relying on secondary sources of information for Temecula news, events, and pro- gramming. Improving satisfaction with the City's communication efforts is thus less an issue of content at this point as it is of penetration, frequency, and readership. One effective strategy recently implemented is mailing news- letters to each household, bi-annually. Based on our research with many other California cities, mailed newsletters are the single most effective method for communicating with residents, and also the method pre- ferred by most adults. Mailed newsletters, paired with the City's e -blasts, timely social media posts, and frequent website updates will maximize the likelihood that the City's messages reach residents, and in turn boost satisfaction accordingly. Finally, it is worth noting that communication preferences typically vary according to the topic at hand and the particular demographic of inter- est. For example, when communicating information that pertains to the community as a whole, such as traffic management and public safety City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 1 0 efforts, a medium that reaches and appeals to a broad range of residents will likely be the most effective method (such as direct mail). However, as the topic becomes more specifically targeted, so too should the method of dissemination. For example, informing residents about a recreation or community event focused on younger adult residents or those with young children in the home might be best accomplished with one or more forms of electronic distribution, such as a City blog or social media (see Table 10 on page 46 for an example of how communication prefer- ences differ between age groups). City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 1 1 QUALITY OF LIFE The opening series of questions in the survey was designed to assess residents' top of mind per- ceptions about the quality of life in Temecula, what residents like most about the City, and what City government could do to improve the quality of life in Temecula. At the outset of the interview, respondents were asked to rate the quality of life in the City, using a five -point scale of excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor. As shown in Figure 1 below, the overwhelming majority of respondents shared favorable opinions of the qual- ity of life in Temecula, with 53% reporting it is excellent and 43% stating it is good. Just 3% of res- idents indicated the quality of life in the City is fair, and less than 1% used poor or very poor to describe quality of life in the City. The percentage of residents who cited the quality of life as either excellent or good remained virtually unchanged between the 2011 and 2014 surveys, although there was a small but significant drop in the percentage who said excellent. Question 2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in the City? Would you say it is excel- lent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 1 QUALITY OF LIFE Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 42.51 52.7t 34.6 60.9 2014 2011 Study Year t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. 44.4 46.1 2007 ■ Refused Not sure • Very poor ■ Poor Fair • Good • Excellent For the interested reader, figures 2 and 3 on the next page show how ratings of quality of life in Temecula varied by years of residence, area of residence, homeownership status, whether or not the respondent regularly commutes outside of Temecula, and age of the respondent. Regardless of subgroup category, respondents generally shared very positive assessments of the quality of life in the City. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 12 FIGURE 2 QUALITY OF LIFE BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Good 522 Excellent 43.3 342 61.4 Less than 5 5 to 9 46.6 49.6 10to14 15 or more Years in Temecula (Q1) N of R. CA Rd 45.6 51.5 R. CA Rd to Hwy 79 37.4 59.7 S of Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) FIGURE 3 QUALITY OF LIFE BY REGULARLY COMMUTE OUTSIDE CITY & AGE 100 90 80 70 60 v o 50 ce 40 30 20 10 0 Good 41.3 Excellent 54.4 42.9 52.1 Yes No Regularly Commute Outside City (QD6) 41.4 55.2 18 to 24 53.8 35.9 25 to 34 41.0 57.7 37.5 59.4 35 to 44 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 41.2 55.4 Own 46.9 48.5 Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 42.7 57.3 32.8 60.7 55to64 65 or older The current survey, as well as the 2011, 2007, and 2000 surveys, asked respondents what they most liked about living in Temec- ula. The question was asked in an open-ended manner, which allowed respondents to mention any aspect that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown in Figure 4 on the next page. Multiple responses were allowed for this question, which means that the percentages shown in the figure represent the percentage of respondents who mentioned each aspect. The most common response in 2014 was the City's small town feel and community involvement among residents, mentioned by 29% of respondents. Low crime rate (22%), the cleanliness of the City (21%), quality of local schools and education (14%), proximity to areas and attractions out- side the City (11%), and the weather (10%) were also popular responses as to what residents most like about living in Temecula. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 13 Question 3 What are the one or two things that you like most about living in the City of Temec- ula? FIGURE 4 LIKE MOST ABOUT LIVING IN TEMECULA Small town feel / Community involvement Public safety / Low crime rate Cleanliness of City Schools / Quality of education Proximity to areas, attractions outside City Good climate, weather Family / Friends / Neighbors Parks / Recreation opportunities Proximity to shopping, services in City Aesthetic beauty, landscaping of City Newness of City, infrastructure Open space / Mountains Wineries / Vineyards Quality of life / General positive comment Affordable cost of living, housing City planning / Local government Jobs / Business, economic opportunities Religious focus of community Minimal traffic Good air quality Casinos / Indian reservations 10.6 9.6 9.6 9.4 9.4 7.5 6.7 6.1 5.8 4.7 4.2 3.3 2.7 2.1 1 .6 0.5 0.3 14.2 21.8 21 .2 29.4 0 5 10 15 20 Respondents 25 30 The qualitative nature of recording, categorizing, and coding verbatim responses limits the abil- ity to perform statistical significance analysis of the findings between surveys, but for the most part the top responses and their relative ranking have changed little in the time between studies. Table 1 below shows the top five categories from 2014, and the previous three studies. TABLE 1 LIKE MOST ABOUT LIVING IN TEMECULA: 2014 TO 2000 Study Year 2014 2011 2007 2000 Small town feel / Community involvement Public safety / Low cri me rate Cleanliness of City Schools/ Quality of education Proximity to areas, attractions outside City Small t own feel / Community involvement Small town feel / Community involvement Cleanliness of City Cleanliness of City Public safety / Low Public safety / Low crime rate crime rate Proximity to shopping, Schools/ Quality of services in City education Schools / Quality of Parks / Recreation education opportunities Small town feel / Community involvement Cleanliness of City Public safety / Low crime rate Aesthetic beauty, landscaping of City Good climate, weather City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 14 WAYS TO IMPROVE QUALITY Cir- Lii-L Respondents were next asked to indicate the one thing the City could change to make Temecula a better place to live, now and in the future. As with the previous question, Question 4 was asked in an open-ended manner, and the verba- tim responses were recorded and later grouped into the categories shown in Figure 5. Approximately one-quarter of respondents said they could not think of anything to change (17%) or that no changes were needed (8%). Among specific improvements, reducing traffic congestion was mentioned most frequently (20%), followed by improving and repairing roads (10%), improv- ing parks and recreation services and facilities (9%), limiting growth and development (9%), improving police protection and public safety (7%), and attracting employers and businesses to the City (6%). All other improvements were mentioned by Tess than 5% of respondents. Question 4 If the City government could change one thing to make Temecula a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? FIGURE 5 CHANGES TO IMPROVE TEMECULA Reduce traffic Not sure / Cannot think of anything Improve, repair roads Improve, develop parks, recreation Limit, reduce growth, development Do not change anything Improve police protection, public safety Attract employers, high end businesses Improve public transit Lower taxes, fees Reduce cost of housing Improve government process, Council Improve education Provide more entertainment options, nightlife Improve shopping, commercial development Address homeless issue Clean up, beautify City Reduce, enforce speed limit Improve parking Improve hospitals, healthcare Address illegal immigration issue 1 9.8 8.6 8.5 7.9 7.2 5.9 4.4 4.1 3.4 2.8 2.7 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.7 1 .4 1.2 1 .2 0.4 1 0.4 117.0 0 5 10 15 20 Respondents City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 15 TABLE 2 CHANGES TO IMPROVE TEMECULA: 2014 TO 2007 2014 Study Year 2011 2007 Reduce traffic Not sure / Cannot think of anything Improve, repair roads Improve, develop parks, recreation Limit, reduce growth, development Not sure / Cannot think of anything Reduce traffic Improve, repair roads Attract employers, high end businesses Limit, reduce growth, development Reduce traffic Not sure / Cannot think of anything Limit, reduce growth, development Improve, repair roads Improve publi c transit Similar to the prior question, the qualitative nature of recording, categorizing, and coding verbatim responses limits the ability to per- form statistical significance analyses of the findings between studies. Table 2 on the left displays the top five response categories from the three studies in which this question was asked. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 16 CITY SERVICES After measuring respondents' perceptions about the quality of life in Temecula, what they like most about the City, and what they would like to see changed, the survey next turned to assess- ing their opinions about the City's performance in providing various municipal services. uvItKAILIL SA ILAN The first question in this series asked respondents to indicate if, overall, they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City of Temecula is doing to provide city services. Because this question does not reference a specific program, facility, or service and requested that the respondent consider the City's performance in general, the findings of this question may be regarded as an overall performance rating for the City. As shown in Figure 6, the vast majority (93%) of Temecula residents indicated they were either very (53%) or somewhat (40%) satisfied with the City's efforts to provide municipal services. Only 4% were very or somewhat dissatisfied, and another 3% were unsure. Similar to the perceptions of the quality of life in the City (Question 2), overall satisfaction in 2014 was nearly identical to that found in 201 1, although there was a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of sat- isfaction when comparing the two studies. Question 5 Next, I'm going to ask a series of questions about services provided by the City of Temecula. Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City is doing to provide city services? FIGURE 6 OVERALL SATISFACTION Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 39.5t 53.21 2014 R 29.9 61.8 2011 37.8 53.9 Study Year 2007 37.0 54.8 2000 • Refused Not sure ■ Very dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied ■ Somewhat satisfied • Very satisfied t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. The next two figures display how residents' opinions about the City's overall performance in pro- viding municipal services varied by years of residence, area of residence, homeownership status, whether or not the respondent regularly commutes outside of Temecula, and age of the respon- dent. The most striking pattern in both figures is that the high levels of satisfaction exhibited by respondents as a whole (see Figure 6 above) were also found across all resident subgroups. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 17 FIGURE 7 OVERALL SATISFACTION BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Smwt satisfied 41.0 Very satisfied 51 .0 29.1 62.5 Less than 5 5 to 9 47.2 44.1 41.1 54.3 10to14 15 or more Years in Temecula (Q1) 34.7 56.0 42.5 52.7 52.6 N of R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) FIGURE 8 OVERALL SATISFACTION BY REGULARLY COMMUTE OUTSIDE CITY & AGE Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Smwt satisfied 44.3 Very satisfied 48.6 Yes 36.3 56.3 No Regularly Commute Outside City (QD6) 48.3 48.3 18 to 24 46.2 43.6 25 to 34 38.5 53.8 35 to 44 33.3 59.4 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 57.3 Own 46.3 46.3 Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 34.7 61.3 32.8 57.4 55 to 64 65 orolder SPECIFIC SERVICES Whereas Question 5 addressed the City's overall performance, the next two questions asked respondents to rate the importance of specific services offered by the City, as well as their level of satisfaction with efforts to provide these services. For each service, respondents were first asked whether they thought a service was extremely important, very important, somewhat important, or not at all important. The order of the items was randomized for each respondent to avoid a systematic position bias. Figure 9 presents the services sorted in order of importance according to the percentage of respondents who rated a service as at least very important. Overall, Temecula residents rated maintaining a low crime rate as the most important of the services tested (98% extremely or very important), followed providing fire protection and prevention services (93%), and providing emergency paramedic services (91%). At the other end of the spectrum, providing local public transportation and shuttle services (40%), and satisfying residents' needs for shopping opportu- nities (41%) were viewed as less important, overall. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 18 Question 6 For each of the services 1 read, please tell me whether the service is extremely important to you, very important, somewhat important, or not at all important. FIGURE 9 IMPORTANCE OF SERVICES Maintaining a low crime rate Providing fire protection and prevention services Providing emergency paramedic services Providing a variety of parks and recreation facilities Promoting jobs development in the City Maintaining local streets and roads Providing reliable garbage and recycling services Managing residential growth in the City Providing library services Providing neighborhood police patrols Coordinating traffic signals Providing a variety of recreation programs Providing programs and services to those with special needs Enforcing traffic laws Acquiring and protecting open space Maintaining sidewalks and curbs Providing senior services Maintaining bike lanes and trails Managing commercial growth in the City Providing cultural arts, public art, theater, museum Providing teen services Providing special events Satisfying residents' needs for shopping opportunities Providing local public transportation and shuttle services Extremely important Very important 57.3 40.9 39.9 52.7 44.4 46.1 34.6 50.3 39.1 44.8 26.9 57.0 26.7 56.1 36.1 42.5 27.8 49.6 32.8 42.9 34.3 36.8 20.7 49.5 25.8 43.8 20.9 46.2 30.6 35.4 16.9 48.8 27.3 36.9 24.6 35.9 19.8 38.4 19.2 38.9 18.7 38.6 22.3 33.5 1 1 .4 30.0 13.1 26.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 % Respondents 100 Question 7 For the same list of services 1 just read, I'd like you to tell me how satisfied you are with the job the City is doing to provide the service. Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to: , or do you not have an opinion? Turning to the satisfaction component, Figure 10 on the next page sorts the same list of services according to the percentage of respondents who indicated that they were either very or some- what satisfied with the City's efforts to provide the service. For ease of comparison across ser- vices, only respondents who provided an opinion (either satisfied or dissatisfied) are included in Figure 10. Those who did not share an opinion were removed from this analysis, and the per- centage who offered an opinion and were included in this analysis is shown in brackets to the right of each service label. Thus, for example, among the 97% of respondents who expressed an opinion about the City's efforts to provide reliable garbage and recycling service, 71% were very satisfied and 28% were somewhat satisfied. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 19 Respondents were most satisfied with the City's efforts to provide reliable garbage and recycling services (99% very or somewhat satisfied), provide emergency paramedic services (98%), provide fire protection and prevention services (98%), satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities (98%), and provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities (97%). At the other end of the spec- trum, respondents were less satisfied with the City's performance in coordinating traffic signals (67%), promoting jobs development in the City (71%), and managing residential growth in the City (73%). FIGURE 10 SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES Provide reliable garbage and recycling services [97%] Provide emergency paramedic services [85%] Provide fire protection and prevention services [89%] Satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities [94%] Provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities [95%] Provide library services [94%] Maintain a low crime rate [97%] Provide special events [89%] Provide a variety of recreation programs [87%] Provide programs and services to those with special needs [62%] Maintain sidewalks and curbs [93%] Provide cultural arts, public art, theater, museums [90%] Provide senior services [67%] Maintain bike lanes and trails [86%] Manage commercial growth in the City [89%] Maintain local streets and roads [96%] Provide teen services [67%] Acquire and protect open space [82%] Provide neighborhood police patrols [91%] Enforce traffic laws [92%] Provide local public transportation and shuttle services [79%] Manage residential growth in the City [92%] Promote jobs development in the City [81%] Coordinate traffic signals [93%] •Very satisfied •Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied •Very dissatisfied 70.8 72.0 72.8 64.8 27.8 26.3 24.9 32.8 28.4 3 1 32.2 5 1 38.0 4 2 36.0 5 2 42.9 48.9 3 5 30.7 7.9 45.7 43.6 8.6 2 36.7 52.2 7.4 4 38.1 50.4 7.8 4 42.8 44.6 F 7.9 5 47.5 37.8 12.1 3 33.0 51.0 6.5 9.4 30.5 51.3 8.1 10.1 39.8 40.7 13.8 5.8 42.6 37.4 14.3 5.7 35.3 42.7 14.2 ■ 7.8 28.9 44.3 15.9 10.9 19.8 51.0 36.0 31.0 18.7 10.4 18.4 14.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 % Respondents Who Provided Opinion 100 Table 3 provides the percentage of respondents who expressed satisfaction with each service tested in the 2014, 201 1 , 2007, and 2000 surveys, as well as the difference in satisfaction between 2011 and 2014. Comparing the current survey with 201 1 , there were statistically signif- icant decreases in satisfaction with efforts to coordinate traffic signals and provide neighbor- hood police patrols. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 20 TABLE 3 SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES: 2014 TO 2000 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 21 2014 2011 Study Year 2007 2000 Change in Sat isfact ion 2011 to 2014 Provide emergency paramedic services 98.3 93.9 95.1 94.7 +4.5 Provide teen services 84.0 81.2 78.4 N/A +2.8 Promote jobs development in the City 70.8 68.4 75.1 78.8 +2.4 Provide reliable garbage and recycling services 98.6 98.3 96.9 97.2 +0.4 Provide library services 95.7 95.4 96.2 N/A +0.3 Provide services to those with special needs 91.8 91.6 N/A N/A +0.3 Provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities 96.5 96.2 96.8 N/A +0.2 Acquire and protect open space 81.7 81.8 N/A N/A -0.1 Provide special events 94.2 94.5 94.5 N/A -0.3 Satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities 97.6 98.1 95.7 98.0 -0.5 Maintain a low crime rate 94.3 95.1 94.1 94.8 -0.8 Provide a variety of recreation programs 92.2 93.1 91 .1 N/A -0.8 Provide fire protection and prevention services 97.7 98.8 98.2 96.5 -1.1 Maintain bike lanes and trails 88.5 89.9 85.8 88.2 -1.4 Provide senior services 88.9 91.6 84.8 N/A -2.7 Manage commercial growth in the City 87.4 90.3 76.6 80.2 -2.9 Provide cultural arts, public art, theater, museums 89.2 92.8 N/A N/A -3.6 Manage residential growth in the City 73.2 79.2 60.8 62.2 -6.0 Enforce traffic laws 80.0 86.5 82.1 81.6 -6.5 Maintain sidewalks and curbs 91.5 98.2 95.2 95.2 -6.6 Maintain local streets and roads 85.4 92.1 86.6 86.7 -6.7 Provide local public transportation, shuttle services 78.0 85.9 73.3 77.2 -7.9 Provide neighborhood police patrols 80.5 89.1 84.7 86.3 -8.7t Coordinate traffic signals 67.0 77.4 69.7 67.1 -10.31 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 21 PERFORMANCE NEEDS & PRIORITIES With a measure of the importance of a service to residents as well as a measure of satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide the service, True North is able to examine the relationship between these two dimensions and identify areas where the City has the greatest opportunities to improve resident satisfaction—and identify for which services the City is meeting, and even exceeding, the majority of residents' needs. Rather than rely on sample averages to conduct this analysis, True North has developed and refined an individualized approach to identifying priorities. This approach is built on the recogni- tion that opinions will vary from resident to resident and that understanding this variation is required for assessing how well the City is meeting residents' needs.3 Table 4 presents a grid based on the importance and satisfaction scales. The horizontal axis corresponds to the four importance options, and the vertical scale corresponds to the four satisfaction options. The 16 cells within the grid are grouped into one of six categories based on how well the City is meet- ing, or not meeting, a resident's needs for a particular service. The six groups are as follows: Exceeding Needs Meeting Needs, Moderately Meeting Needs, Marginally Not Meeting Needs, Marginally Not Meeting erately The City is exceeding a respondent's needs if a respondent is satisfied and the level of expressed satisfaction is higher than the importance the respondent assigned to the service. The City is moderately meeting a respondent's needs if the respondent is satisfied and the level of satisfaction is commensurate with the level of importance assigned to the service. The City is marginally meeting a respondent's needs if the respondent is satisfied with the City's efforts to provide the service, but their level of satisfaction is lower than the level of importance assigned to the service. The City is marginally not meeting a respondent's needs if the respon- dent is somewhat dissatisfied, but the service is also viewed as just somewhat or not at all important. Needs, Mod- The City is moderately not meeting a respondent's needs if a) a respon- dent is very dissatisfied with efforts to provide the service, but the ser- vice is viewed as somewhat or not at all important, or b) a respondent is somewhat dissatisfied and the service is viewed as very important. Not Meeting Needs, Severely The City is severely not meeting a respondent's needs if a) a respondent is dissatisfied and the service is viewed as extremely important, or b) a respondent is very dissatisfied and the service is viewed as very impor- tant. 3. Any tool that relies on the opinions of the average respondent will provide a limited and occasionally dis- torted picture of how well an agency is performing. The simple fact is that a city is not comprised of average residents—it is comprised of unique individuals who vary substantially in their opinions of the City's perfor- mance in different service areas. Thus, although the arithmetic average of these individuals' opinions is a useful statistic, it does not capture the variation in opinions that occurs among residents, and it is this varia- tion that is critical for truly assessing how well the City is meeting the needs of its residents. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 22 TABLE 4 NEEDS & PRIORITY MATRIX 0 v un Very satisfied Somewhat satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Importance Not at all important Exceeding needs Exceeding needs Not meeting needs, marginally Not meeting needs, moderately Somewhat important Exceeding needs Meeting needs, moderately Not meeting needs, marginally Not meeting needs, moderately Very important Meeting needs, moderately Meeting needs, marginally Not meeting Not meeting needs, severely Extremely important Meeting needs, moderately Meeting needs, marginally Not meeting needs, severely Not meeting needs, severely Using this framework, True North categorized respondents individually for each of the 24 ser- vices tested in the 2014 study. Thus, for example, a respondent who indicated that coordinating traffic signals was somewhat important and they were very satisfied with the City's efforts in this service area would be categorized in the exceeding needs group for this service. The same respondent may be grouped in the marginally not meeting needs group for another service (e.g., promoting jobs development) if they were somewhat dissatisfied with the City's efforts to pro- vide the service, but the service was viewed as only somewhat important. Figure 11 on the next page present each of the services tested, along with the percentage of respondents who were grouped into each of the six possible categories. For ease of interpreta- tion, the color -coding in these figures is consistent with that presented in Table 4. Thus, for example, in the service area of coordinating traffic signals, the City is exceeding the needs of 11% of respondents, moderately meeting the needs of 37% of respondents, marginally meeting the needs of 19% of respondents, marginally not meeting the needs of 2% of respondents, mod- erately not meeting the needs of 10% of respondents, and severely not meeting the needs of 20% of respondents. Operating from the management philosophy that, all other things being equal, the City should focus on improving those services that have the highest percentage of residents for which the City is currently not meeting their needs, the services have been sorted in order of priority. Thus, coordinating traffic signals is the top priority, followed by promoting jobs development in the City, managing residential growth in the City, providing local public transportation and shuttle services, and enforcing traffic laws. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 23 IfiEr 10 20 3 25 42 9 20 8 29 36 ®4 20 19 47 12 8 8 12 45 23 8 8 7 44 29 5 12 8 41 33 4 13 10 44 30 3 10 7 49 29 ` 7 7 15 49 23 3 7 12 46 31 3 5 9 44 36 4 6 18 46 25 4 5 16 55 20 4 1 7 52 33 7 12 56 24 6 19 61 15 13 1 61 32 1 4 10 68 18 31 54 32 21 40 45 12 2 75 21 3 74 22 0 9 69 20 0 FIGURE 11 RESIDENT SERVICE NEEDS Coordinating traffic signals Promoting jobs development in the City Managing residential growth in the City Providing local public transportation and shuttle services Enforcing traffic laws Providing neighborhood police patrols Acquiring and protecting open space Providing teen services Maintaining local streets and roads Managing commercial growth in the City Maintaining bike lanes and trails Providing senior services Providing cultural arts, public art, theater, museum Maintaining sidewalks and curbs Providing programs and services to those with special needs Providing a variety of recreation programs Providing special events Maintaining a low crime rate Providing library services Providing a variety of parks and recreation facilities Satisfying residents' needs for shopping opportunities Providing fire protection and prevention services Providing emergency paramedic services Providing reliable garbage and recycling services 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 % Respondents Who Provided Opinion 90 100 • Exceeding needs • Meeting needs moderately • Meeting needs marginally Not meeting needs marginally • Not meeting needs moderately • Not meeting needs severely City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 24 COMMUNITY FACILITIES & PROGRAMS By providing areas and opportunities to recreate, relax, and play, the City of Temecula's parks, recreation facilities, community centers, and scheduled activities, classes, and special events help promote a sense of community in the City, improve property values, enhance the business climate and local economy, and generally contribute to a higher quality of life for residents and visitors. The next four questions of the survey sought to profile residents' use and perceptions of community parks and recreational facilities, as well as their participation in, and opinions about, City -sponsored programs and special events. The first question of this series mea- sured household visits to, or use of, eight different facility types, both general and specific. As shown in Figure 1 2, nine out of ten (91 % of) respondents reported that someone in their house- hold had visited a park or open space area in Temecula during the 12 months prior to the sur- vey. Eight -in -ten (79% of) households had visited the Temecula Public Library, and about seven - in -ten (68%) had visited a City -operated recreation or sports facility. A smaller percentage of households had visited the Temecula Community Theater in Old Town (46%), the Civic Center (44%), the Children's Museum (31%), the History Museum (27%), and the Senior Center (14%) in the past year. Question 8 As I read each of the following community facilities, please tell me whether you or another member of your household has visited this facility in the past 12 months. FIGURE 1 2 HOUSEHOLD COMMUNITY FACILITY VISIT Households That Visited in Past 12 Months 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 91.0 79.3 67.8 46.0 44.1 30.7 27.0 14.4 City park or Temecula City rec or Temecula The Civic Children's The History The Senior open space Public Library sports facility Community Center Museum Museum Center area Theatre Q8 Community Falility & Programs Table 5 on the next page displays the percentage of households that visited or used each facility in the past 12 months by study year. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2011 and 2014 studies. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 25 TABLE 5 HOUSEHOLD COMMUNITY FACILITY VISIT: 2014 TO 2007 L.UIVIMUNI 1 Y I-A(..ILI 1 Y RATING! All respondents, regardless of a visit mentioned in Question 8, were asked to rate the overall quality, safety, accessibility, and appearance of Tem- ecula's parks and recreation facilities. The responses from the 2014 and prior three studies are presented below in Figure 1 3. An overwhelming majority of residents in 2014 rated each of the four dimensions as excellent or good: overall quality (92%), safety (89%), accessibility (92%), and appearance (94%). Question 9 How would you rate the of Temecula's park and recreation facilities? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 13 RATING PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 51.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Overall quality 39.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Safety 1 1 2014 2011 2007 2000 Ac cessibility Q9 Rating parks and rec facilities ... 38.0 57.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Appearance t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair • Good • Excellent 9' C PP(C PARI cDFCIA! IFVFNT 1.1011cFHlrl1 ! PAPT!C1PATI(RI The City of Temecula provides extensive opportunities for active and passive recreation and personal enrichment for its residents, such as Summer Concerts, the Holiday Lights Bus Tour, and an Eas- ter Egg Hunt, as well as organized sports, dance, art, and wellness classes. Question 10 of the survey asked respondents if they or anyone in their household had participated in such a pro- gram or event in the past 12 months. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 26 2014 StudyYear 2011 2007 Change in Households That Visited 2011 to 2014 The Civic Center 44.1 38.0 N/A +6.2 City park or open space area 91.0 91.9 87.3 -0.9 The History Museum 27.0 28.0 N/A -1.0 The Senior Center 14.4 15.6 N/A -1.2 Temecula Public Library 79.3 80.9 74.8 -1.5 Temecula Community Theatre 46.0 47.9 36.2 -1.9 City rec or sports facility 67.8 72.6 71.5 -4.8 Children's Museum 30.7 35.8 31.2 -5.1 L.UIVIMUNI 1 Y I-A(..ILI 1 Y RATING! All respondents, regardless of a visit mentioned in Question 8, were asked to rate the overall quality, safety, accessibility, and appearance of Tem- ecula's parks and recreation facilities. The responses from the 2014 and prior three studies are presented below in Figure 1 3. An overwhelming majority of residents in 2014 rated each of the four dimensions as excellent or good: overall quality (92%), safety (89%), accessibility (92%), and appearance (94%). Question 9 How would you rate the of Temecula's park and recreation facilities? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 13 RATING PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 51.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Overall quality 39.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Safety 1 1 2014 2011 2007 2000 Ac cessibility Q9 Rating parks and rec facilities ... 38.0 57.0 2014 2011 2007 2000 Appearance t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair • Good • Excellent 9' C PP(C PARI cDFCIA! IFVFNT 1.1011cFHlrl1 ! PAPT!C1PATI(RI The City of Temecula provides extensive opportunities for active and passive recreation and personal enrichment for its residents, such as Summer Concerts, the Holiday Lights Bus Tour, and an Eas- ter Egg Hunt, as well as organized sports, dance, art, and wellness classes. Question 10 of the survey asked respondents if they or anyone in their household had participated in such a pro- gram or event in the past 12 months. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 26 Question 10 In the past 12 months, have you or any member of your household participated in a recreational program or special event offered by the City of Temecula? FIGURE 14 HOUSEHOLD PARTICIPATION IN RECREATIONAL PROGRAM OR SPECIAL EVENT: 2014 TO 2007 Households 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 No household participation 45.2 Yes, household participated 52.0 2014 49.5 49.2 2011 Study Year 51.8 47.8 2007 As shown in the figure to the left, about half (52%) of Temecula households had participated in a recreational program or special event offered by the City in the past year, which was similar to the findings of the prior two studies. Respondents who reported that one or more members of their household had participated in a recreational program or special event in Temecula in the past 12 months were asked to rate the overall quality of the programs or events using a five -point scale of excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor. As displayed in Figure 15 below, nearly all respondents (97%) rated the quality of Tem- ecula's recreation programs and special events as excellent (60%) or good (37%), 3% rated them as fair, and no one rated them poor or very poor. Question 11 Overall, how would you rate the quality of Temecula's recreational programs and special events that your household participated in? Would you say it was excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 15 QUALITY OF RECREATION PROGRAMS & SPECIAL EVENTS: 2014 TO 2007 100 E 90 o c 80 a o u.� cc . 70 LT, 60 v „ H SO N = voi 30 o a o 20 cc 10 0 City of Temecula 36.6 60.2 2014 37.5 60.2 2011 Study Year 45.9 45.7 2007 Not sure •Very poor •Poor Fair •Good ■Excellent True North Research, Inc. © 2014 27 TRAFFIC In nearly all southern California cities, traffic congestion ranks among the most pressing prob- lems that residents would like local and regional governments to solve. As noted previously (see Figure 5 on page 15), a reduction in traffic congestion was the most frequently mentioned improvement that residents feel is needed to make Temecula a better place to live. r(M-i-iL L.ii`tCULATION The 2014 survey measured residents' perceptions of traffic circu- lation in the City overall, on major streets, and in residential areas. As shown in Figure 16, approximately one-quarter (23%) of residents rated overall traffic circulation as poor or very poor. Traffic circulation on major streets received similar ratings, with 27% citing it as poor or very poor. Traffic circulation in residential areas was viewed much more positively, with only 4% of respondents indicating it is poor or very poor. Question 12 Next, I'd like to ask you a few questions about traffic circulation. By traffic circula- tion, I mean the ability to drive around Temecula without encountering long delays. Would you rate: within the City as excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 16 RATING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION: 2014 TO 2000 100 90 80 70 fjo 60 - o • 50 o. ce 40 a'. 30 20 0 37.1 36.5 2011 2007 Overall 29.3 5.3 6.6 1 9.6 9 31.5 21.5 4.0 2000 2014 2011 2007 On major streets Q12 Rating traffic circulation ... 7.5 34.5 2014 2011 2007 In residential areas t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair • Good • Exc ellent For the interested reader, Figure 17 on the next page presents the findings of Question 12 by the respondents' area of residence. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 28 FIGURE 1 7 RATING TRAFFIC CIRCULATION BY AREA OF RESIDENCE % Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 30 20 10 40.9 5.9 N of R. CA Rd 9.5 14.6 35.8 R. CA Rd to Hwy 79 Overall S of Hwy 79 Nof R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 On major streets Q12 Rating traffic circulation ... 42.0 38.9 50 3 31 .3 47.1 37.0 N of R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to 5 of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 In residential areas Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair ■ Good • Excellent SATISFACTION WITH EFFORTS TO IMPROVE CIRCULATION The Traffic Engineer- ing Division and the Public Traffic and Safety Commission work together to address day-to-day traffic operations, safety issues, and future transportation needs for the City of Temecula. The next question in this section of the survey asked respondents about their satisfaction with City efforts to improve traffic circulation. Figure 18 shows that 65% of residents indicated they were very (25%) or somewhat (40%) satisfied with the City's efforts to improve circulation, whereas 33% were very (1 3%) or somewhat (20%) dissatisfied. The two figures on the next page show the responses to Question 13 varied by a variety of demographics. Question 13 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to improve traffic circulation by improving roads and intersections, timing traffic signals, and other measures? FIGURE 18 SATISFACTION WITH TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS: 2014 TO 2007 % Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 13.31- 40.4 3.3t 40.4 24.6 2014 8.8 40.0 30.2 2011 Study Year t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 2011 and 2014 studies. 19.2 36.4 21.4 2007 • Not sure • Very dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied • S omewhat satisfied • Ve ry satisfied City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 29 FIGURE 19 SATISFACTION WITH TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & REGULARLY COMMUTE OUTSIDE CITY 80 70 60 50 0 40 v 30 3° 20 10 0 Smwt satisfied 47.1 Very satisfied 20.3 41.0 26.6 Less than 5 5to9 47.3 24.4 28.0 27.7 1 0 to 1 4 15 or more Years in Temecula (Q1) 40.1 29.6 39 9 22.3 40.7 21.5 N of R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to 5 of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) 39.6 25.3 Yes 40.5 24.3 No Regularly Commute Outside City (QD6) FIGURE 20 SATISFACTION WITH TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENT EFFORTS BY GENDER & AGE 80 70 60 50 c N -a o 40 a v 30 20 10 Smwt satisfied 42.8 Very satisfied 26.7 Male 38.4 22.7 Female Gender (QD9) 41 .4 31.0 18 to 24 43.6 10.3 25 to 34 42.3 23.1 37.5 30 2 35 to 44 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 38.7 21.3 37.7 36.1 55 to 64 65 or older City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 30 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A key challenge for all cities is to create sustainable economic development and redevelopment initiatives that will support the tax base required for current and future needs. Naturally, the suc- cess and sustainability of future retail economic initiatives depend in part on the shopping behaviors and preferences of Temecula residents. Businesses that meet these preferences will thrive, whereas those that do not will not succeed. Accordingly, the survey included three ques- tions designed to identify residents' desire for new shopping opportunities. All residents were first asked to indicate whether, among the retail stores their household cur- rently shops at outside the City, there are any they would like to have available in Temecula. Half (50%) of residents answered this question in the affirmative, which was significantly higher than the finding of the 2011 study (see Figure 21 below). FIGURE 21 DESIRE ADDITIONAL RETAIL STORES IN TEMECULA: 2014 TO 2014 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Do not desire additional stores 44.3t Yes, desire additional stores 50.21 2014 57.5 38.1 2011 Study Year 54.0 42.3 2007 Question 14 Next, I'd like to ask you a few questions about your retail shopping. Thinking of the retail stores that your household currently shops at outside of the City, are there any that you would like to have available in Temecula? The next two figures examine responses to Question 14 by a vari- ety of demographics. In general, those who reside south of Hwy 79, women, and those between 25 and 34 years of age were the most likely subgroups to desire additional retail stores in Temecula. t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. FIGURE 22 DESIRE ADDITIONAL RETAIL STORES IN TEMECULA BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & REGULARLY COMMUTE OUTSIDE CITY 70 2 C 60 ro < Q 50 F 40 s v 30 '(7";c _in 20 o o. 10 cc 30 0 48.7 50.5 55.1 48.4 47.6 50.7 57.3 51.2 49.2 Less than 5 5 to 10to14 15ormore Years in Temecula(Q1) Nof R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) Yes No Regularly Commute Outside City (QD6) City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 31 FIGURE 23 DESIRE ADDITIONAL RETAIL STORES IN TEMECULA BY GENDER & AGE 70 0 60 ro Q'u 50 ~ 40 1 `0 30 o -6'tl 20 a 10 5 57.4 41.7 48.3 59.0 51 .3 53.1 37.3 42.6 Male Female Gender(QD9) 18to24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 55 to 64 65 or older Those interested in new retail stores were next asked to name the one or two stores they were most interested in having located in Temecula. Question 15 was asked in an open-ended man- ner, allowing respondents to name any store or business that came to mind without being prompted by or restricted to a particular list of options. True North later reviewed the verbatim responses and grouped them into the categories shown on the next page in Figure 24. The most commonly mentioned store was Nordstrom, named by one-third (33%) of respondents who received the question. Other common mentions were: clothing stores (12%), Whole Foods Market (9%), sporting goods and outdoor recreation stores (8%), high-end department stores (7%), Cheesecake Factory (6%), Fry's Electronics (6%), and large discount retail and warehouse stores (5%). No other categories or specific stores were mentioned by at least 5% of respondents. Question 15 What are the names of the one or two stores you would most like to have located in the City of Temecula? FIGURE 24 ADDITIONAL STORES DESIRED IN TEMECULA Nordstrom Clothing stores Whole Foods Sporting goods, outdoor rec stores High-end department stores Cheesecake Factory Fry's Electronics Large discount retail, warehouse stores IKEA Ethnic foods grocery stores Other restaurants Health, organic food stores Cosmetic, beauty stores Bed, Bath & Beyond Furniture, home decor stores Children's toy, clothing, accessories stores Department stores Grocery stores Home improvement stores Mall, outlets Drug stores 12.3 9.0 8.1 6.5 5.8 5.8 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.3 4.2 3.8 2.3 1 .5 1 .4 1 .4 1.0 33.2 0 10 20 30 % Respondents Who Desire Additional Stores in Temecula 40 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 32 FIGURE 25 INTEREST IN WHOLE FOODS MARKET Not interested 24.9 Not sure Refused 6.5 0.2 Very interested 39.0 Slightly interested 10.2 Somewhat interested 19.2 Question 16 Would you be interested in having Whole Foods Market open a store in Temecula? New to the 2014 survey was a question designed to gauge interest in having a Whole Foods Market located in Temecula. As shown in Figure 25, 39% of respondents said they were very interested, 19% said they were somewhat interested, and 10% said they were only slightly interested. One quarter (25%) of residents surveyed were not interested, and 7% were not sure. Fig- ures 26 and 27 display interest by a variety of subgroups. FIGURE 26 INTEREST IN WHOLE FOODS MARKET BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & REGULARLY COMMUTE OUTSIDE CITY 80 70 60 "2 50 v o 40 v 30 38 20 10 0 Smwt interested 18.5 Very interested 39.1 21.1 33.8 Less than 5 5 to 9 19.9 43.5 10to14 15 or more Years in Temecula (Q1) 1 9.1 35.9 N of R. CA Rd 17.9 47.1 R. CA Rd to Hwy 79 22.2 33.1 5 of Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) FIGURE 27 INTEREST IN WHOLE FOODS MARKET BY GENDER & AGE 80 70 60 50 aa,, o 40 0. a, 30 20 10 Smwt interested 22.6 Very interested 31.9 Male City of Temecula 16.3 45.0 Gender Female 24.1 31.0 18 to 24 15.4 41.0 25 to 34 11.5 48.7 26.0 42.7 35 to 44 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 19.7 41.0 Yes 19.1 38.1 No Regularly Commute Outside City (QD6) 20.0 33.3 23.0 23.0 55 to 64 65 or older True North Research, Inc. © 2014 33 SPENDING PRIORITIES It is often the case that residents' desires for public facilities and programs exceed a city's finan- cial resources. In such cases, a city must prioritize projects and programs with consideration of a variety of factors, including the preferences and needs of residents. Question 17 was designed to provide the City of Temecula with a reliable measure of how resi- dents as a whole prioritize a variety of projects, programs, and improvements to which the City could allocate resources in the future. The format of the question was straightforward: after informing respondents that the City does not have the financial resources to fund all projects and programs that may be desired by residents, respondents were asked whether each project or program shown in Figure 28 should be a high, medium, or low priority for future City spending— or if the City should not spend money on the project at all. The projects and programs are sorted in Figure 28 by the percentage of respondents who indi- cated that an item was a high or medium priority for future City spending. Among the items tested, making infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation was assigned the high- est priority (91% citing it as at least a medium priority), followed by providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City (87%), attracting and or expanding institutions of higher learning such as a college or university (79%), expanding services and programs for peo- ple with special needs (77%), and acquiring and protecting open space and natural habitat areas in and around the City (76%). Question 17 The City of Temecula has the financial resources to provide some of the projects and programs desired by residents. Because it can not fund every project and program, how- ever, the City must set priorities. As 1 read each of the following items, I'd like you to indicate whether you think the City should make the item a high priority, a medium priority, or a low pri- ority for future City spending. If you feel the City should not spend any money on this item, just say so. Please keep in mind that not all of the items can be high priorities. FIGURE 28 SPENDING PROJECT PRIORITIES Q1 7n Q1 7fQ1 7m Q1 7i Q1 7kQ1 713 Q1 71 Q1 7c Q1 7g Q1 7a Q1 7j Q1 7d Q1 7hQ1 7e Make infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation Provide incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City Attract, expand institutions of higher learning Expand services and programs for people with special needs Acquire and protect open space and natural habitat areas Expand teen services and programs Increase recreational programs Develop arts, culture, history, sporting events, facilities Expand and improve the network of recreational trails Revitalize Jefferson Corridor, outdated commercial areas of City Improve the appearance of public infrastructure and landscapes Expand library services, add digital -download to check out books Build additional park -n -ride lots for carpoolers Open a satellite library facility south of Temecula Parkway City of Temecula •High priority • Medium priority 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 % Respondents 100 True North Research, Inc. © 2014 34 Eleven of the fourteen items tested in Question 17 were also tested in the 201 1 survey. As shown in Table 6 below, there was a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of respondents who considered providing incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City a high priority for future City spending (-10%). There were no other significant differences between the spend- ing projects tested in both the 2011 and 2014 surveys. TABLE 6 SPENDING PROJECT PRIORITIES: 2014 TO 2007 1 Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 35 2014 Study Year 2011 2007 Change in % High Priority 2011 to 2014 Expand and improve the network of recreational trails 19.9 14.8 1 7.4 +5.1 Revitalize Jefferson Corridor, outdated commercial areas of City 30.1 25.4 N/A +4.7 Make infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation 65.2 61.5 78.4 +3.7 Acquire and protect open space and natural habitat areas 42.5 39.4 47.5 +3.1 Expand services, programs for people with special needs 34.9 33.2 N/A +1.7 Develop arts, culture, history, sporting events, facilities 23.4 21.9 N/A +1.5 Improve the appearance of public infrastructure and landscapes 17.1 16.7 18.6 +0.3 Build additional park -n -ride lots for carpoolers 17.6 17.8 21.3 -0.1 Increase recreational programs 18.3 22.1 22.0 -3.8 Attract, expand institutions of higher learning 51.2 56.2 54.8 -4.9 Provide incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City 64.3 74.8 52.6 -10.41 Build a Teen Center and expand teen services 26.5 N/A N/A N/A Expand library services, add digital -download to check out books 22.1 N/A N/A N/A Open a satellite library facility south of Temecula Parkway 20.2 N/A N/A N/A 1 Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 35 Good 40.2 Excellent 27.8 SCHOOLS & OLD TOWN The next section of the survey touched upon two topic areas that contribute to residents' overall quality of life: overall quality of education, and the City's Historic Old Town Area. The Temecula Valley Unified School District serves the City of Temecula and includes 17 elementary schools, 6 middle schools, 5 high schools, 2 charter schools, a K -through -8 home school, a virtual school, and an adult school. Question 18 of the survey asked residents to rate the overall quality of education provided by Temecula's public schools using a five -point scale of excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor. Question 18 In general, how would you rate the quality of education provided in Temecula's public schools? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? FIGURE 29 QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: 2014 TO 2007 % Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 4.6 36.6 39.7 2014 11.9 30.6 45.7 2011 Study Year r 3:9 34.0 42.0 2007 Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair • Good ■ Excellent Figure 29 presents the find- ings of this question and shows that 76% of residents felt that, in general, the qual- ity of education in Temecula was excellent (40%) or good (37%). Six percent (6%) cited the quality of education as fair, 2% said poor, and 2% very poor. For the interested reader, Figure 30 displays opinions regarding the quality of edu- cation by years of residence, area of residence, and age. FIGURE 30 QUALITY OF EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & AGE % Respondents Who Provided Opinion 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 37. 41.3 31.1 45.0 36.8 47.8 Less than 5to9 10to14 15 or 5 Years in Temecula (Q1) City of Temecula more 37.7 40.5 37.0 39.5 34.5 42.4 N of R. CA R. CA Rd S of Hwy Rd to Hwy 79 79 Area of Residence (QD1) 48.3 37 9 43.6 28.2 35.9 44.9 30.2 51.0 40.0 34.7 31.1 37 / 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older Age (QD8) True North Research, Inc. © 2014 36 OLD TOWN TEMECULA VISITS Old Town Temecula blends historic 19th century build- ings with hundreds of antique stores, specialty food stores, boutiques, gift and collectible stores, museums, and hotels. Old Town Temecula is also the site of many special events includ- ing car shows, Western Days, and the popular Farmer's Market. The next question of the survey asked residents about the frequency of their visits to Old Town. As shown in Figure 31, about one-quarter (26%) of residents said they visit Old Town Temecula at least once per week, and another 26% said they visit the area two to three times per month. One-quarter (25%) said once per month, and 21% indicated that they visit less than once per month. Only 2% of residents said they never visit Old Town Temecula. Question 19 How often do you visit Old Town, also known as Downtown Temecula? At least once per week, two to three times per month, once per month, less often than once per month, or never. FIGURE 31 FREQUENCY OF OLD TOWN TEMECULA VISITS: 2014 TO 2007 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 2014 25.1 2011 Study Year 4.9 22.5 21.6 2007 t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Not sure ❑ Never <1x/ mnth 1x / mnth ■ 2-3x / mnth ■ 1x/wk The next question asked respondents to rate their experiences in Old Town Temecula. Figure 32 on the next page shows that responses were quite positive, with almost nine -in -ten respondents citing their Old Town Temecula experiences as excellent (42%) or good (44%). Twelve percent (12%) said their experiences in Old Town were fair, and less than 1% said poor or very poor. Com- pared with the findings of the 2011 survey, there was a small but significant decrease in the per- centage of favorable ratings of Old Town. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 37 FIGURE 32 RATING OLD TOWN TEMECULA: 2014 & 2011 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 43.8 42.4t 2014 40.7 51.5 Study Year 2011 Not sure • Very poor • Poor Fair • Good • Excellent Question 20 Overall, how would you rate your experiences in Old Town, also known as Downtown Temecula? Would you say they've been excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Figure 33 looks at ratings of Old Town Temecula experiences by respondent age and the fre- quency of his or her visits. Ratings were high across the board, although those who frequently visit the Old Town area were more likely than their counterparts to cite their experiences as excellent or good. FIGURE 33 RATING OLD TOWN TEMECULA BY AGE & FREQUENCY OF OLD TOWN VISITS 100 90 '. 5 80 •. o c > a 70 a.,O t6-0 60 x v o 50 40 2 o ,2 30 o 20 99 0 0 Good 29.6 Excellen 59.3 41.0 43.6 49.3 42.7 45.3 43.8 49.3 50.0 34.5 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older Age (QD8) 33.2 59.8 47.0 45.1 1x/wk 2-3x/ mnth 45.9 40.7 1x / mnth 50 7 25.3 Frequency of Old Town Visits (Q19) <lx/ mnth City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 38 STAFF & COUNCIL Although much of the survey focused on residents' satisfaction with the City's efforts to provide specific services, like other progressive cities, Temecula recognizes there is more to good gover- nance than simply providing satisfactory services. Do residents perceive that the City is respon- sive to their needs and listens to them when making important decisions? Do residents feel that staff serves their needs in a professional and courteous manner? Do residents trust the City of Temecula? Answers to questions like these are as important as service or policy -related ques- tions in measuring the City's performance in meeting residents' needs. Accordingly, they were the focus of the next section of the survey. ,r—'T" The first question in this series was designed to measure how residents perceive the City regarding its responsiveness to residents' needs, management of funds, and tendency to listen to residents when making important decisions, as well as their trust of the City in general. For each of the statements shown at the bottom of Figure 34, respondents were asked if they agreed or disagreed with the statement. Percentages shown in the figure are among those with an opinion.4 Among those with an opinion, the City received favorable marks for each of the aspects tested in Question 21. Ninety percent (90%) of respondents agreed with the statements, / trust the City of Temecula and The City manages its finances well. Eight -seven percent (87%) agreed that the City is responsive, and 82% agreed that the City listens to residents when making important deci- sions. Table 7 on the next page displays the level of agreement with each statement for the cur- rent study and the 2011 study, and shows there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of residents that agreed the City manages its finances well. Question 21 Next, I'm going to read you a series of statements about the City of Temecula. For each, I'd like you to tell me whether you agree or disagree with the statement. FIGURE 34 AGREEMENT WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT CITY Respondents Who Provided Opinion 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 57.7 29.6 5.0 51.4 38.4 7.1 57.5 24.1 48.3 41.4 City is responsive City manages finances well City listens to residents I trust the City of Temecula [85% provided opinion] [73% provided opinion] [75%provided opinion] [90% provided opinion] Q21 Agreement with statements about City ... • Strongly disagree ■ Somewhat disagree • Somewhat agree • Strongly agree 4. The percentage of respondents who provided an opinion for each statement is shown below it in brackets. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 39 TABLE 7 AGREEMENT WITH STATEMENTS ABOUT CITY: 2014 & 2011 t Statistically significant difference (p < 0 05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Residents were next asked if they had been in contact with City of Temecula staff in the past 12 months. Figure 35 provides the findings of this question and shows that 32% of residents indicated they had contact with City staff in the 12 months prior to the interview, which was similar to the findings of the prior three studies. Figure 36 shows that contact with City staff in the past 12 months differed considerably by the respondent's area of residence, home ownership status, and age. Question 22 In the past 12 months, have you been in contact with City of Temecula staff? FIGURE 35 CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF IN PAST 12 MONTHS: 2014 TO 2000 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 No contact with City staff 66.4 Yes, contact with City staff 32.2 2014 70.8 28.9 2011 66.7 33.0 Study Year 2007 64.3 35.8 2000 FIGURE 36 CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF IN PAST 12 MONTHS BY AREA OF RESIDENCE, HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS & AGE 50 45 3 -5, 40 u 8 35 ro g 8 30 174 25 ul a .88 20 C o n 15 T GI 0 10 05 0 30.3 27.4 39.7 33.9 28.3 20.7 43.6 29.5 35.4 25.3 34.4 Nof R. CA R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Rd Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) Own Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older Age (QD8) City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 40 Study Year Change in %Agree 2014 2011 2011 to 2014 City manages finances well 89.8 84.3 +5.4f I trust the City of Temecula 89.7 88.5 +1 .2 City is responsive 87.3 86.7 +0.7 City listens to residents 81.6 81.6 +0.0 t Statistically significant difference (p < 0 05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. Residents were next asked if they had been in contact with City of Temecula staff in the past 12 months. Figure 35 provides the findings of this question and shows that 32% of residents indicated they had contact with City staff in the 12 months prior to the interview, which was similar to the findings of the prior three studies. Figure 36 shows that contact with City staff in the past 12 months differed considerably by the respondent's area of residence, home ownership status, and age. Question 22 In the past 12 months, have you been in contact with City of Temecula staff? FIGURE 35 CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF IN PAST 12 MONTHS: 2014 TO 2000 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 No contact with City staff 66.4 Yes, contact with City staff 32.2 2014 70.8 28.9 2011 66.7 33.0 Study Year 2007 64.3 35.8 2000 FIGURE 36 CONTACT WITH CITY STAFF IN PAST 12 MONTHS BY AREA OF RESIDENCE, HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS & AGE 50 45 3 -5, 40 u 8 35 ro g 8 30 174 25 ul a .88 20 C o n 15 T GI 0 10 05 0 30.3 27.4 39.7 33.9 28.3 20.7 43.6 29.5 35.4 25.3 34.4 Nof R. CA R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Rd Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) Own Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 or older Age (QD8) City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 40 Presented only to residents who had been in contact with City staff in the past 12 months, Ques- tion 23 asked respondents to rate staff on four dimensions: courteousness, helpfulness, profes- sionalism, and knowledge. The findings of this question are presented below in Figure 37. As shown in the figure, City staff received solid marks on each dimension of customer service tested. Ninety-two percent (92%) felt that City staff members were courteous, 93% said they were professional, 90% said they were helpful, and 93% considered staff to be knowledgeable. Question 23 In your opinion, is the staff at the City very , somewhat , or not at all FIGURE 37 RATING CITY STAFF Respondents With Staff Contact in Past 12 Months 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 6.0 22.9 69.5 Courteous 9.0 32.0 58.2 3.8 29,4 64.0 Helpful Professional Q23 Rating City staff ... 42.0 51.1 Knowledgeable • Not sure • Not at all ■ Somewhat • Very When compared with the findings of the 2011 study, the percentage of respondents who used very decreased for three of the four dimensions, although none of the differences was statisti- cally significant (see Table 8 below). TABLE 8 RATING CITY STAFF: 2014 TO 2007 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 41 Study Year Change in %Very 2014 2011 2007 2011 to 2014 Helpful 58.2 56.5 65.8 +1.7 Courteous 69.5 72.4 73.9 -2.9 Professional 64.0 67.7 73.5 -3.7 Knowledgeable 51.1 59.8 61.6 -8.6 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 41 The fourth and final question of this series asked respondents if they had been in contact with a member of the City Council in the past 12 months. As shown in the next figure, 11% of residents indicated they had been in contact with a Council member during that period, nearly identical to the findings from the prior two studies. Figure 39 at the bottom of the page shows how contact with a Council member in the past 12 months differed by area of residence, home ownership sta- tus, and age. Question 24 In the past 12 months, have you been in contact with a member of the City Coun- cil? FIGURE 38 CONTACT WITH COUNCIL IN PAST 12 MONTH: 2014 TO 2007 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 No contact with Council 87.9 Yes, contact with Council 11.2 89.5 10.3 2014 2011 Study Year FIGURE 39 CONTACT WITH COUNCIL IN PAST 12 MONTHS BY AREA OF RESIDENCE, HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS & AGE S 7.6 12.4 2007 20 15 10 5 0 12.8 10.6 9.1 12.2 9.6 10.3 10.3 11.5 8.3 13.3 16.4 N of R. CA R. CA Rd to 5 of Hwy 79 Rd Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) Own Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 and older Age (QD8) City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 42 CITY -RESIDENT COMMUNICATION The importance of City -resident communication cannot be overstated. Much of a city's success is shaped by the quality of information that is exchanged in both directions, from the City to its residents and vice -versa. This study is just one example of Temecula's efforts to enhance the information flow to the City to better understand residents' concerns, perceptions, and needs. In this section, we present the results of several communication -related questions. Question 25 of the survey asked residents to report their satis- faction with City -resident communication in the City of Temecula. Overall, 78% of respondents indicated they were satisfied with City efforts to communicate with residents through newslet- ters, the Internet, social media, and other means. The remaining respondents were either some- what (9%) or very (4%) dissatisfied with the City's efforts in this respect, or did not provide an opinion (10%). These findings were similar to those of the 2011 study, although there was a 4 - point increase in satisfaction, with a statistically significant decrease in the percentage of respondents who were somewhat dissatisfied. Question 25 Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to communicate with residents through newsletters, the Internet, social media, and other means? FIGURE 40 SATISFACTION WITH COMMUNICATION: 2014 TO 2000 Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 43.7 34.4 2014 2011 Study Year 2007 2000 ▪ Not sure • Ve ry dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied ■ Somewhat satisfied • Ve ry satisfied 1- Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. For the interested reader, figures 41 and 42 on the next page display how opinions about the City's efforts to communicate with residents varied by demographic subgroups. Although satis- faction with City -resident communication differed between subgroups, most residents were sat- isfied, with between 69% and 86% of each subgroup reporting they are at least somewhat satisfied with the City's efforts in this respect. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 43 FIGURE 41 SATISFACTION WITH COMMUNICATION BY YEARS IN TEMECULA, AREA OF RESIDENCE & HOME OWNERSHIP STATUS % Respondents 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Smwt satisfied 48.2 Very satisfied 24.3 42.2 39.3 48.0 37.6 36.1 37.9 Lessthan5 5to9 10to14 15ormore Years in Temecula (Q1) 49.8 31.9 39.4 31.7 41.7 39 7 N of R. CA Rd R. CA Rd to S of Hwy 79 Hwy 79 Area of Residence (QD1) FIGURE 42 SATISFACTION WITH COMMUNICATION BY GENDER & AGE 100 90 80 70 c 60 a, 0 0 50 a 40 30 20 10 Smwt satisfied 45.4 Very satisfied 34.1 41.6 34.1 Male Female Gender(QD9) 48.3 34.5 18 to 24 46.2 30.8 25 to 34 41.0 34.6 41.7 39.6 35 to 44 45 to 54 Age (QD8) 40.5 36.2 Own 49.6 31.2 Rent Home Ownership Status (QD2) 41.3 28.0 49.2 31.1 55 to 64 65 and older To help the City identify the most effective means of communi- cating with residents, it is helpful to understand what information sources they currently rely on for this type of information. In an open-ended manner, residents were asked to list the sources they typically use to find out about City of Temecula news, information, and programming. Because respondents were allowed to provide up to three sources, the percentages shown in Fig- ure 43 on the next page represent the percentage of residents who mentioned a source. As shown in Figure 43, the most frequently -cited sources for City information, each mentioned by 37% of respondents, were the City Newsletter and the Internet in general. Other popular sources were the City's website (24%), the Press Enterprise (16%) and Valley News (14%) newspa- pers, and friends, family, and associates (1 3%). All other sources were mentioned by fewer than 10% of respondents. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 44 Question 26 What information sources do you use to find out about City of Temecula news, information and programming? FIGURE 43 CITY INFORMATION SOURCES City Newsletter - 37.2 Internet in general 37.0 City's website 24.4 Press Enterprise 16.1 Valley News newspaper 14.2 Friends, Family, Associates 1 2.7 Television 9.5 Social Media 8.7 Flyers, brochures 7.6 Email from City 5.6 Californian newspaper 14.5 Community events 4.4 Radio 3.9 Do not receive info 2.8 Temecula Patch 2.5 Newspaper in general 2.2 Direct mail in general 1 .9 City Council Meetings (in-person) 1 .4 City Council Meetings (televised) 0.9 0 10 20 30 40 % Respondents Table 9 displays the top five information sources mentioned in each of the past three studies. The City Newsletter and City's website have been amongst the top five sources cited by residents since the 2007 survey. TABLE 9 TOP CITY INFORMATION SOURCES: 2014 TO 2007 2014 Study Year 2011 2007 City Newsletter Internet in general City Newsletter Internet in general City Newsletter Internet in general City's website City's website Californian newspaper Press Enterprise newspaper Television City's website Valley News Californian newspaper Press Enterprise newspaper newspaper For the interested reader, Table 10 shows the responses to Question 26 by age of the respon- dent. The top five mentions within each age group are highlighted green. As one might expect, use of different media varied by respondent age, although there was considerable overlap among the top choices across age groups. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 45 TABLE 1 0 TOP CITY INFORMATION SOURCES BY AGE The Temecula City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesday of every month at 7:OOPM in Council Chambers. Because the City recognizes that its residents have busy schedules with often limited flexibility, it has made efforts to provide a variety of options for residents to view the Council Meetings. These options include: attending Council Meetings in-person, viewing a televised version of the meeting on Channel 3, or viewing it online, either during the meeting, or on -demand from an archive located on the City's website. The final substantive question of the survey asked respondents to identify their viewership of City Council Meetings across the three possible methods. As shown in Figure 44, approximately 28% of residents had viewed a Council Meeting through at least one of the three methods in the 12 months prior to the survey. One -in -five (22%) residents had viewed a Council Meeting on tele- vision, 9% had attended a Council Meeting in person, and 3% had viewed a meeting via the Inter- net. Table 11 provides the findings from 2014 compared with the 2011 and 2007 studies. Question 27 In the past 12 months, have you 7 FIGURE 44 CITY COUNCIL VIEWERSHIP IN PAST 1 2 MONTHS 30 25 v c 2 .8 r' 20 > s d .E 15 v En 0 0 a„, 10 ire g 0 0 U 5 0 28.1 21 .7 8.7 3.1 In person, on television, On television or on Internet In person On Internet Q27 Viewed Council Meeting in past 12 months .. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 46 18 to 24 25 to 34 Age (QD8) 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 and o Ider City Newsletter 31.0 48.7 41.0 29.2 34.7 36.1 Internet in general 48.3 41.0 38.5 33.3 32.0 26.2 City's website 10.3 25.6 21.8 36.5 28.0 14.8 Press Enterprise newspaper 6.9 12.8 9.0 17.7 20.0 39.3 Valley News newspaper 3.4 1 5.4 1 9.2 1 3.5 13.3 19.7 Friends, Family, Associates 3.4 12.8 17.9 10.4 12.0 19.7 Television 10.3 5.1 3.8 13.5 10.7 23.0 Social Media 10.3 15.4 12.8 6.3 2.7 4.9 Flyers, brochures 3.4 5.1 9.0 9.4 5.3 4.9 Email from City 6.9 5.1 3.8 4.2 8.0 6.6 Californian newspaper 13.8 2.6 2.6 2.1 4.0 3.3 Community events 0.0 2.6 7.7 6.3 2.7 4.9 Radio 3.4 2.6 2.6 2.1 5.3 6.6 Do not receive info 0.0 5.1 1.3 4.2 5.3 1.6 Temecula Patch 3.4 2.6 3.8 1.0 2.7 0.0 Newspaper in general 6.9 2.6 1.3 0.0 2.7 0.0 Direct mail in general 3.4 0.0 2.6 2.1 4.0 0.0 City Council Meetings (in-person) 3.4 0.0 1.3 0.0 4.0 0.0 City Council Meetings (televised) 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 2.7 3.3 The Temecula City Council meets the second and fourth Tuesday of every month at 7:OOPM in Council Chambers. Because the City recognizes that its residents have busy schedules with often limited flexibility, it has made efforts to provide a variety of options for residents to view the Council Meetings. These options include: attending Council Meetings in-person, viewing a televised version of the meeting on Channel 3, or viewing it online, either during the meeting, or on -demand from an archive located on the City's website. The final substantive question of the survey asked respondents to identify their viewership of City Council Meetings across the three possible methods. As shown in Figure 44, approximately 28% of residents had viewed a Council Meeting through at least one of the three methods in the 12 months prior to the survey. One -in -five (22%) residents had viewed a Council Meeting on tele- vision, 9% had attended a Council Meeting in person, and 3% had viewed a meeting via the Inter- net. Table 11 provides the findings from 2014 compared with the 2011 and 2007 studies. Question 27 In the past 12 months, have you 7 FIGURE 44 CITY COUNCIL VIEWERSHIP IN PAST 1 2 MONTHS 30 25 v c 2 .8 r' 20 > s d .E 15 v En 0 0 a„, 10 ire g 0 0 U 5 0 28.1 21 .7 8.7 3.1 In person, on television, On television or on Internet In person On Internet Q27 Viewed Council Meeting in past 12 months .. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 46 TABLE 11 CITY COUNCIL VIEWERSHIP IN PAST 12 MONTHS: 2014 TO 2007 t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 47 Study Year Change in Viewership 2014 2011 2007 2011 to 2014 In person 8.7 9.7 8.6 -1.0 On television 21.7 24.4 31.0 -2.8 On Internet 3.1 8.3 5.5 -5.2t In person, on television, or on Internet 28.1 35.5 37.5 -7.4t t Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 201 1 and 2014 studies. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 47 BACKGROUND & DEMOGRAPHICS TABLE 12 DEMOGRAPHICS OF SAMPLE: 2014 TO 2007 City of Temecula Table 12 presents the key demo- graphic and background information that was collected during the survey. Because of the probability -based sampling methodology used in this study, the results shown in the table are representative of adult residents in the City of Temecula. The primary motivation for collecting the back- ground and demographic informa- tion was to provide a better insight into how the results of the substan- tive questions of the survey vary by demographic characteristics (see Appendix A for more details). True North Research, Inc. © 2014 48 2014 Study Year 2011 2007 Total Respondents 402 400 400 Years in Temecula (Q1) Fewer than 5 29.3 33.0 34.1 5 to 9 23.9 21.5 27.3 10 t o 14 19.6 19.8 19.4 15 or more 26.9 25.4 19.2 Refused 0.2 0.2 0.0 Area of Residence (QD1) Old Town Area 4.3 4.5 3.7 North of Rancho California Rd 29.2 31.1 32.2 Between Rancho California Rd, Hwy 79 S 34.0 33.9 39.3 South of Hwy 79 S 28.4 26.8 21.6 Refused 4.0 3.8 3.1 Home Ownership Status (QD2) Own 67.1 74.2 79.7 Rent 30.3 25.3 19.6 Refused 2.7 0.4 0.7 QD3 Home type Single family 84.1 84.5 N/A Apartment 8.5 9.6 N/A Condo 5.0 2.7 N/A Mobile home 0.4 2.2 N/A Refused 2.0 1.0 N/A QD4 Home type in five years Single family 84.3 86.3 N/A Apartment 7.8 5.3 N/A Condo 3.9 3.3 N/A Mobile home 0.7 1.9 N/A Refused 3.3 3.3 N/A QD5 Employment status Full-time 49.5 47.6 56.3 Part-time 9.7 10.7 8.7 Student 7.4 5.9 7.0 Homemaker 9.4 9.6 9.1 Retired 15.6 16.7 14.4 In-between jobs 3.8 8.1 2.4 Refused 4.6 1.4 2.1 QD6 Regularly commute outside Temecula Not employed / Not a student 33.4 35.8 28.0 Yes 37.0 36.3 37.3 No / Refused 29.6 27.9 34.7 QD7 Commute destination County Not employed / Not student / Do not commute 63.0 63.7 62.7 LA 2.4 2.9 1.7 Orange 2.5 2.4 2.1 Riverside 7.9 8.2 10.1 San Bernardino 1.5 1.9 1.9 San Diego 18.6 19.0 16.1 Ventura 0.3 0.0 0.0 Other 3.5 1.2 4.7 Refused 0.2 0.8 0.7 QD8 Age 18to24 13.1 13.4 16.0 25to34 16.3 17.3 17.4 35 to 44 20.8 21.7 24.2 45 to 54 21.9 19.7 20.7 55 to 64 1 1 .9 16.6 10.4 65 and older 10.1 1 1 .2 9.7 Refused 6.0 0.0 1.5 QD9 Gender Male 45.9 51.7 49.1 Female 54.1 48.3 50.9 City of Temecula Table 12 presents the key demo- graphic and background information that was collected during the survey. Because of the probability -based sampling methodology used in this study, the results shown in the table are representative of adult residents in the City of Temecula. The primary motivation for collecting the back- ground and demographic informa- tion was to provide a better insight into how the results of the substan- tive questions of the survey vary by demographic characteristics (see Appendix A for more details). True North Research, Inc. © 2014 48 M ETHODOLOGY The following sections outline the methodology used in the study, as well as the motivation for using certain techniques. Dr. McLarney of True North Research worked closely with the City of Temecula to develop questionnaires that covered the topics of interest and avoided the many possible sources of systematic measurement error, including position -order effects, wording effects, response -category effects, scaling effects, and priming. Several ques- tions included multiple individual items. Because asking items in a set order can lead to a sys- tematic position bias in responses, the items were asked in a random order for each respondent. Some of the questions asked in this study were presented only to a subset of respondents. For example, only respondents who were employed full- or part-time were asked about their com- mute. The questionnaire included with this report (see Questionnaire & Toplines on page 52) identifies the skip patterns that were used during the interview to ensure that each respondent received the appropriate questions. Most of the questions asked in the 2014 survey were tracked directly from the 2011, 2007, and 2000 surveys. �IU1� Prior to fielding the survey, the questionnaire was CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) programmed to assist interviewers when conduct- ing the telephone interviews. The CATI program automatically navigates the skip patterns, ran- domizes the appropriate question items, and alerts the interviewer to certain types of keypunching mistakes should they happen during the interview. The integrity of the question- naire was pre -tested internally by True North and by dialing into random homes in the City of Temecula prior to formally beginning the survey. JAiviY�L., Ki_Li.U'i iiv , do UM i A LOYLLtc. i i .i A total of 3,500 households within the City of Temecula were initially selected for this study using a comprehensive database of Temec- ula households (listed by physical address/location) and stratified random sampling methods. This approach ensured that all households in Temecula had an equal probability of being selected for the survey, not just those that have land lines or published cell phone numbers. All selected households were mailed a letter that briefly explained the purpose of the survey and invited them to take the survey online. Each household was assigned a unique password to ensure that only Temecula residents who received a letter could access the online survey site, and that each household could complete the survey only one time. Following a ten-day period of online data collection, True North began placing telephone calls to land lines and cell phone numbers of households throughout the City that had yet to participate in the online survey. During the telephone interviews, additional screening questions were uti- lized as needed to balance the sample demographics. Additionally, because the City of Temecula shares phone exchanges with neighboring cities and unincorporated areas of the County, respondents were initially asked the ZIP code of their residence (see Question SC1). Only those in ZIP codes 92590, 92591, and 92562 who indicated that they live inside the City limits of Temec- ula (QSC2) were eligible to participate in the study. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 49 Telephone interviews averaged 20 minutes in length and were conducted during weekday eve- nings (5:30PM to 9PM) and on weekends (10AM to 5PM). It is standard practice not to call during the day on weekdays because most working adults are unavailable and thus calling during those hours would bias the sample. A total of 402 interviews were completed between April 25 and May 8, 2014. t;TAT1c1PC.A Mt PG'!! ("IF FRF By using a probability -based sample and monitoring the sample characteristics as data collection proceeded, True North ensured that the sample was representative of adult residents in the City of Temecula. The results of the sample can thus be used to estimate the opinions of all adult residents in the City. Because not every adult in the City participated in the survey, however, the results have what is known as a statistical margin of error due to sampling. The margin of error refers to the difference between what was found in the survey of 402 adults for a particular question and what would have been found if all of the estimated 69,333 adults in the City5 had been interviewed. For example, in estimating the percentage of adult residents who have been in contact with a member of City Council in the past 12 months (Question 24), the margin of error can be calcu- lated if one knows the size of the population, the size of the sample, a desired confidence level, and the distribution of responses to the question. The appropriate equation for estimating the margin of error, in this case, is shown below. ;+ t rNI_(1_) N n-1 where p is the proportion of adults who said they were in contact with a member of City Council in the past 12 months (0.11 for 11% in this example), N is the population size of all adults (69,333), n is the sample size that received the question (402), andt is the uppera /2 point for the t -distribution with n-1 degrees of freedom (1 .96 for a 95% confidence interval). Solving the equation using these values reveals a margin of error of ± 3.05%. This means that with 11% of survey respondents indicating they had been in contact with a member of City Council in the past 12 months, we can be 95% confident that the actual percentage of all adult residents in con- tact with a Council member during this period is between 8% and 14%. Figure 45 provides a plot of the maximum margin of error in this study. The maximum margin of error for a dichotomous percentage result occurs when the answers are evenly split such that 50% provide one response and 50% provide the alternative response (i.e., p = 0.5). For this sur- vey, the maximum margin of error is ± 4.89% for questions answered by all 400 respondents. Within this report, figures and tables show how responses to certain questions varied by demo- graphic characteristics such as area of the City, age of the respondent, and years of residence. Figure 45 is thus useful for understanding how the maximum margin of error for a percentage estimate will grow as the number of individuals asked a question (or in a particular subgroup) shrinks. Because the margin of error grows exponentially as the sample size decreases, the reader should use caution when generalizing and interpreting the results for small subgroups. 5. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 American Community Survey. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 50 FIGURE 45 MAXIMUM MARGIN OF ERROR 14% 12% 10% 8% 0 0 ro 6% 4% Sample of 402 Adult Residents ± 4.87% 2% 0% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Sample Size (Number of Respondents) Data processing consisted of checking the data for errors or inconsis- tencies, coding and recoding responses, categorizing verbatim responses, and preparing fre- quency analyses and cross -tabulations. Where appropriate, tests of statistical significance were conducted to evaluate changes in responses between the 2011 and 2014 studies. Numbers that end in 0.5 or higher are rounded up to the nearest whole number, whereas numbers that end in 0.4 or lower are rounded down to the nearest whole number. These same rounding rules are also applied, when needed, to arrive at numbers that include a decimal place in constructing figures and charts. Occasionally, these rounding rules lead to small discrepancies in the first decimal place when comparing tables and pie charts for a given question. City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 51 QUESTIONNAIRE & TOPLINES j"RURN©RTH �, N LE S E A R C; H City of Temecula Resident Survey Final Toplines May 2014 Section 1: Introduction to Study Hi, my name is and I'm calling on behalf of TNR, a public opinion research company. We're conducting a survey about issues in your community and we would like to get your opinions. If needed: This is a survey about important issues in Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la), I'm NOT trying to sell anything and I won't ask for a donation. If needed: The survey should take about 15 minutes to complete. If needed: If now is not a convenient time, can you let me know a better time so I can call back? If the person says they are an elected official or is somehow associated with the survey, politely explain that this survey is designed to the measure the opinions of those not closely associated with the survey, thank them for their time, and terminate the interview. Section 2: Screener for Inclusion in the Study For statistical reasons, I would like to speak to the youngest adult male currently at home that is at least 18 years of age. (if there is no male currently at home that is at least 18 years of age, then ask): Ok, then I'd like to speak to the youngest female currently at home that is at least 18 years of age. (If there is no adult currently available, then ask for a callback time.) NOTE: Adjust this screener as needed to match sample quotas on gender & age SC1 To begin, 1 have a few screening questions. What is the zip code at your residence? (Read zip code back to them to confirm correct) 1 92590, 92591, 92592 100% Go to SC2 3 Any other ZIP code 0% Terminate SC2 Do you live inside the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la), or outside of the city limits? 1 Inside 100% Qualified for Study 2 Outside 0% Terminate 99 Not sure / Prefer not to answer 0% Terminate Copyright © 2014 True North Research, Inc. Page 1 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 52 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Section 3: Quality of Life I'd like to begin by asking you a few questions about what it is like to live in the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la). Q1 How long have you lived in the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? 1 Less than 1 year 6% 2 1 to 4 years 23% 3 5 to 9 years 24% 4 10 to 14 years 20% 5 15 years or longer 27% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Q2 How would you rate the overall quality of life in the City? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? 1 Excellent 53% 2 Good 43% 3 Fair 3% 4 Poor 0% 5 Very poor 1% 98 Not sure 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Q3 What are the one or two things that you like most about living in the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Small town feel / Community involvement 29% Public safety / Low crime rate 22% Cleanliness of City 21% Schools / Quality of education 14% Proximity to areas, attractions outside City 11% Good climate, weather 10% Family / Friends / Neighbors 10% Proximity to shopping, services in City 9% Parks / Recreation opportunities 9% Aesthetic beauty, landscaping of City 8% Newness of City, infrastructure 7% Open space / Mountains 6% Wineries / Vineyards 6% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 2 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 3 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 54 Quality of life / General positive comment 5% Affordable cost of living, housing 4% jobs / Business, economic opportunities 3% City planning / Local government 3% Minimal traffic 2% Religious focus of community 2% Q4 If the City government could change one thing to make Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) a better place to live now and in the future, what change would you like to see? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Reduce traffic 20% Not sure / Cannot think of anything 1 7% Improve, repair roads 1 0% Limit, reduce growth, development 9% Improve, develop parks, recreation 9% Do not change anything 8% Improve police protection, public safety 7% Attract employers, high end businesses 6% Lower taxes, fees 4% Improve public transit 4% Improve education 3% Improve government process, Council 3% Reduce cost of housing 3% Improve shopping, commercial development 2% Clean up, beautify City 2% Provide more entertainment options, nightlife 2% Address homeless issue 2% Improve hospitals, healthcare 1% Improve parking 1% Reduce, enforce speed limit 1% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 3 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 54 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Section 4: City Services Next, I'm going to ask a series of questions about services provided by the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la). Q5 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the job the City is doing to provide city services? Get answer, then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 1 Very satisfied 53% 2 Somewhat satisfied 40% 3 Somewhat dissatisfied 2% 4 Very dissatisfied 2% 98 Not sure 3% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Split Sample for Questions 6 & 7. Subsample A gets items A -L, Subsample B gets items M -X. Q6 For each of the services I read, please tell me whether the service is extremely important to you, very important, somewhat important, or not at all important. Make sure respondent understands the 4 point scale. Randomize Extremely Important Very Important Somewhat Important Not at all Important 0 0 n 0 0 z Prefer not to answer A Enforcing traffic laws 21% 46% 29% 3% 1% 0% B Maintaining a low crime rate 57% 41% 2% 0% 0% 0% C Providing neighborhood police patrols 33% 43% 21% 2% 1% 0% D Providing fire protection and prevention services 40% 53% 7% 1% 0% 0% E Providing emergency paramedic services 44% 46% 9% 1% 0% 0% F Satisfying residents' needs for shopping opportunities 11% 30% 45% 13% 0% 0% G Maintaining local streets and roads 27% 57% 16% 1% 0% 0% H Managing commercial growth in the City 20% 38% 35% 5% 2% 1% I Maintaining sidewalks and curbs 1 7% 49% 30% 4% 1% 0% J Providing reliable garbage and recycling services 27% 56% 16% 1% 0% 0% K Coordinating traffic signals 34% 37% 25% 3% 0% 0% Providing local public transportation andL shuttle services 1 3% 26% 46% 12% 3% 0% M Maintaining bike lanes and trails 25% 36% 33% 6% 1% 0% N Managing residential growth in the City 36% 42% 16% 4% 1% 0% 0 Promoting jobs development in the City 39% 45% 11% 4% 1% 0% P Providing a variety of recreation programs 21% 49% 26% 2% 2% 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 4 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 55 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Q Providing a variety of parks and recreation facilities 35% 50% 1 1% 3% 0% 0% R Providing library services 28% 50% 1 8% 5% 0% 0% S Providing teen services 1 9% 39% 30% 1 1% 2% 0% T Providing senior services 27% 37% 27% 4% 4% 0% Providing special events, such as the Fourth of July Parade and summer concerts 22% 3356 38% 6% 0% 0% V Providing cultural arts, public art, theater and museum services 1 9% 39% 33% 8% 0% 0% W Providing programs and services to those with special needs 26% 44% 23% 4% 3% 0% X Acquiring and protecting open space 31% 35% 25% 7% 3% 0% Q7 For the same list of services I just read, I'd like you to tell me how satisfied you are with the job the City is doing to provide the service. Are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to: , or do you not have an opinion? Get answer. If `satisfied' or 'dissatisfied', then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? Randomize - v vbo Somewhat Satisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied . w > .N b c o c o z Prefer not to answer A Enforce traffic laws 39% 3496 1 396 5% 8% 0% B Maintain a low crime rate 60% 31% 5% 1% 3% 0% C Provide neighborhood police patrols 36% 37% 1 3% 5% 9% 0% D Provide fire protection and prevention services 65% 22% 2% 0% 11% 0% E Provide emergency paramedic services 61% 22% 196 1% 1 5% 0% F Satisfy residents' needs for shopping opportunities 61% 31% 2% 0% 6% 0% G Maintain local streets and roads 46% 36% 1 2% 2% 4% 0% H Manage commercial growth in the City 38% 39% 7% 4% 1 1% 1% I Maintain sidewalks and curbs 56% 28% 7% 1 % 7% 0% J Provide reliable garbage and recycling services 69% 27% 1% 0% 3% 0% K Coordinate traffic signals 33% 29% 1 7% 1 4% 7% 0% LProvide local public transportation and shuttle services 28% 34% 11% 6% 20% 1% M Maintain bike lanes and trails 33% 43% 7% 3% 1 3% 1% N Manage residential growth in the City 27% 41% 1 5% 1 0% 8% 0% 0 Promote jobs development in the City 1 6% 42% 1 5% 9% 1 9% 0% P Provide a variety of recreation programs 49% 31% 5% 2% 1 3% 0% Q Provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities 59% 33% 3% 1% 5% 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 5 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 56 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 R Provide library services 63% 27% 3% 1% 6% 0% S Provide teen services 22% 34% 4% 6% 32% 1% T Provide senior services 25% 35% 5% 2% 33% 0% The Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) Community Theatre in Old Town Provide special events, such as the Fourth ofU July Parade and summer concerts 50% 34% 3% 2% 11% 0% V Provide cultural arts, public art, theater and museum services 41% 39% 8% 2% 10% 41% W Provide programs and services to those with special needs 27% 30% 2% 3% 37% 1% X Acquire and protect open space 25% 42% 7% 8% 17% 0% Secton 5: Community Facilities and Programs Q8 As I read each of the following community facilities, please tell me whether you or another member of your household has visited this facility in the past 12 months. i °Randomize z 3 c « w -,Z „, A A city park or open space area 91% 9% 0% B A recreation or sports facility operated by the City 68% 30% 2% C The Children's Museum 31% 68% 1% D The Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) Community Theatre in Old Town 46% 53% 1% E The Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) Public Library 79% 20% 1% F The Civic Center 44% 55% 1% G The History Museum 27% 72% 1 H The Senior Center 14% 85% 1% Q9 How would you rate the of Temecula's (Tuh-Mek-you-la) park and recreation facilities? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? Read item A first, then randomize v x w 8 LL62 U Poor Very Poor Not Sure Prefer not to answer A Overall quality 58% 35% 4% 0% 0% 3% 0% B Safety 50% 39% 5% 1% 0% 4% 0% C Accessibility 54% 38% 4% 1% 0% 3% 0% D Appearance 59% 35% 4% 0% 0% 2% 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 6 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 57 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Q10 In the past 12 months, have you or any member of your household participated in a recreational program or special event offered by the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Q12 1 Yes 52% Ask Q11 2 No 45% Skip to Q12 98 Not sure 3% Skip to Q12 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Skip to Q12 Q1 1 Overall, how would you rate the quality of Temecula's (Tuh-Mek-you la) recreational programs and special events that your household participated in? Would you say it was excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? 0% 1 Excellent 60% 2 Good 37% 3 Fair 3% 4 Poor 0% 5 Very Poor 0% 98 Don't Know 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Sect on 6: Traffic Q12 Next, I'd like to ask you a few questions about traffic circulation. By traffic circulation, I mean the ability to drive around Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) without encountering long delays. Would you rate: within the City as excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? Read in Order 8 y 73LL w Good 2 Poor `o9 0 L• > c o o Z Prefer not to answer A Overall traffic circulation 6% 37% 34% 14% 9% 0% 0% B Traffic circulation on major streets 6% 30% 37% 17% 1 0% 0% 0% C Traffic circulation in residential areas 34% 48% 1 3% 2% 2% 0% 0% Q13 Generally speaking, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to improve traffic circulation by improving roads and intersections, timing traffic s'gnals, and other measures? Get answer, then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 1 Very satisfied 25% 2 Somewhat satisfied 40% 3 Somewhat dissatisfied 20% 4 Very dissatisfied 1 3% 98 Not sure 2% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 7 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 58 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Section 7: Economic Development Next, I'd like to ask you a few questions about your retail shopping. Q14 Thinking of the retail stores that your household currently shops at outside of the City, are there any that you would like to have available in Temecula (Tuh Mek-you-la)? 1 Yes 50% Ask Q15 2 No 44% Skip to Q16 98 Not sure 5% Skip to Q16 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Skip to Q16 Q1 5 What are the names of the one or two stores you would most like to have located in the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Verbatim responses recorded and later grouped into categories shown below. Nordstrom 33% Other clothing stores 12% Whole Foods 9% Sporting goods, outdoor recreation stores 8% High-end department stores 7% Fry's Electronics 6% Cheesecake Factory 6% IKEA 5% Large discount retail, warehouse stores 5% Restaurants 5% Ethnic foods grocery stores 5% Health, organic food stores 5% Bed, Bath & Beyond 4% Cosmetic, beauty stores 4% Furniture, home decor stores 4% Children's toy, clothing, accessories stores 4% Other stores 4% Department stores 2% Grocery stores 2% Mall, outlets 1% Home improvement stores 1% Drug stores 1% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 8 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 59 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Q16 Would you be interested in having Whole Foods Market open a store in Temecula (Tuh- Mek-you-la)? If yes ask: Would that be very interested, somewhat interested, or slightly interested? City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) has the financial resources to provide some of the and programs desired by residents. Because it can not fund every project and however, the City must set priorities. 1 i Very interested 39% 2 Somewhat interested 19% 3 Slightly interested 10% 4 Not interested 25% 98 Not sure 7% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Section 8: Spending Priorities The projects program, City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) has the financial resources to provide some of the and programs desired by residents. Because it can not fund every project and however, the City must set priorities. Q17 As I read each of the following items, I'd like you to indicate whether you think the City should make the item a high priority, a medium priority, or a low priority for future City spending. If you feel the City should not spend any money on this item, just say so. Please keep in mind that not all of the items can be high priorities. Here is the (first/next) one: . Should this item be a high, medium or low priority for the City - or should the City not spend any money on this item? Randomize High Priority Medium Priority Low Priority Should not spend money v 0 z Prefer not to answer A Acquire and protect open space and natural habitat areas in and around the City 42% 33% 19% 4% 1% 1% B Expand and improve the network of recreational trails 20% 44% 30% 5% 1% 0% C Increase recreational programs 18% 51% 23% 5% 2% 0% D Attract and or expand institutions of higher learning such as a college or university 51% 27% 14% 6% 0% 1% E Make infrastructure improvements to improve traffic circulation 65% 26% 7% 1% 0% 0% F Build additional park -n -ride lots for carpoolers 18% 32% 32% 1 5% 4% 0% G Expand teen services and programs 27% 46% 19% 5% 4% 0% H Provide incentives to attract new employers and jobs to the City 64% 23% 8% 4% 1% 0% I Improve the appearance of public infrastructure and landscapes 1 7% 38% 34% 8% 1% 1% J Expand services and programs for people with special needs 35% 42% 15% 3% 5% 1% K Revitalize Jefferson Corridor and other outdated commercial areas of the City 30% 33% 27% 6% 4% 0% Develop high quality arts, culture, history andL sporting events and facilities 23% 44% 28% 4% 1% 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 9 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 60 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 M Expand library services to add digital download as an option to check out books 22% 30% 36% 11% 1% 0% N Open a satellite library facility south of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) Parkway with amenities that include public computers and Internet access 20% 28% 38% 12% 2% 0% Section 9: Schools & Old Town In general, how would you rate the quality of education provided in Temecula's (Tuh- Q18 Mek you -la) public schools? Would you say it is excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? 1 Excellent 40% 2 Good 37% 3 Fair 6% 4 Poor 2% 5 Very Poor 2% 98 Not sure 14% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% How often do you visit Old Town, also known as Downtown Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Q19 At least once per week, two to three times per month, once per month, less often than once per month, or never. 1 Once per week 26% 2 Two to three times per month 25% 3 Once per month 25% 4 Less often than once per month 21% 5 Never 2% 98 Not sure 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Q20 Overall, how would you rate your experiences in Old Town, also known as Downtown Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Would you say they've been excellent, good, fair, poor or very poor? 1 Excellent 42% 2 Good 44% 3 Fair 12% 4 Poor 0% 5 Very Poor 0% 98 Not sure 2% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 10 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 61 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Sect'on 10: Staff & Council Q21 Next, I'm going to read you a series of statements about the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek- you-la). For each, I'd like you to tell me whether you agree or disagree with the statement. Here is the (first/next) one: . Do you agree or disagree, or do you not have an opinion? If agree or disagree, ask: Would that be strongly (agree/disagree) or somewhat (agree/disagree)? Randomize Strongly Agree Smwht Agree Smwht Disagree Strongly Disagree Not sure Prefer not to answer A The City is responsive to residents' needs 25% 49% 8% 3% 14% 1% 8 The City manages its finances well 28% 38% 4% 4% 24% 2% C The City listens to residents when making important decisions 1 8% 43% 9% 5% 24% 1 D I trust the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) 37% 44% 7% 3% 8% 1% Q22 In the past 12 months, have you been in contact with City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) staff? 1 Yes 32% Ask Q23 2 No 66% Skip to Q24 98 Not sure 1% Skip to Q24 99 Prefer not to answer 0% Skip to Q24 Q23 In your opinion, is the staff at the City very , somewhat , or not at all (Read one item at a time, continue until all items are read). Randomize Somewhat Not at all Not sure Prefer not to answer A Courteous 69% 23% 6% 1% 1% B Helpful 58% 32% 9% 1% 0% C Professional 64% 29% 4% 1% 2% D Knowledgeable 51% 42% 4% 2% 2% Q24 In the past 12 months, have you been in contact with a member of the City Council? 1 Yes 11% 2 No 88% 98 Not sure 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 11 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 62 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Sect on 1 1: City -Resident Communication Q25 Overall, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the City's efforts to communicate with residents through newsletters, the Internet, social media, and other means? Get answer, then ask: Would that be very (satisfied/dissatisfied) or somewhat (satisfied/dissatisfied)? 1 Very satisfied 34% 2 Somewhat satisfied 43% 3 Somewhat dissatisfied 8% 4 Very dissatisfied 4% 98 Not sure 10% 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Q26 What information sources do you use to find out about City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you- la) news, information and programming? (Don't read list. Record up to first 3 responses). 1 City Newsletter/Inside Temecula 37% 2 Californian (paper) 5% 3 Press Enterprise (paper) 16% 4 Valley News/Temecula Valley News 14% 5 City Council Meetings (televised) 1% 6 City Council Meetings (in-person) 1% 7 Radio 4% 8 Television (general) 10% 9 City's website 24% 10 Internet (not City's site) 37% 11 Email notification from City 6% 12 Flyers or brochures (displayed at public facilities) 8/ 13 Community events 4% 14 Social Media like Facebook or Twitter 9% 15 Friends/Family/Associates 13% 16 Other source 3% 17 Do Not Receive Information about City 3% 18 Newspaper in general 2% 19 Direct mail in general 2% 20 Temecula Patch 2% 98 Not sure 2% 99 Prefer not to answer 0% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 12 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 63 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 Q27 In the past 12 months, have you ? D1 Which of the following best describes where you live in Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? Ask in order > z io c o v za..... A Attended a Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) City Council meeting in person 9% 91% 1% B Watched a City Council meeting on TV 22% 78% 0% C Watched a City Council meeting over the Internet 3%a 96� 1% Section 12: Background & Demographics Thank you so much for your participation. I have just a few background questions for statistical purposes. D1 Which of the following best describes where you live in Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la)? 1 Old Town Area, also known as the Downtown Temecula Area 4o � 2 North of Rancho California Road 29% 3 Between Rancho California Road and Temecula Parkway/Highway 79 South U 34/ 4 South of Temecula Parkway/Highway 79 South 28% 99 Prefer not to answer 4% D2 Do you own or rent your residence in the City? 1 Own 67% 2 Rent 30% 99 Prefer not to answer 3% D3 Which of the following best describes your current home? 1 Single family detached home 84% 2 Apartment 9% 3 Condominium 5% 4 Mobile home 0% 99 Prefer not to answer 2% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 13 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 64 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 D4 Thinking ahead five years, which of the following best describes the type of housing you expect to live in at that point? 1 Single family detached home 84% 2 Apartment 8% 3 Condominium 4% 4 Mobile home 1% 99 Prefer not to answer 3% D5 Which of the following best describes your employment status? Would you say you are emp oyed full-time, part-time, a student, a homemaker, retired, or are you in-between jobs right now? 1 Employed full-time 49% Ask D6 2 Employed part-time 10% Ask D6 3 Student 7% Ask D6 4 Homemaker 9% Skip to D9 5 Retired 16% Skip to D9 6 In-between jobs 4% Skip to D9 99 Prefer not to answer 5% Skip to D9 D6 Do you commute outside of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) or Murrieta (Mur-ee-yet-uh) on a regular basis for (your job/school)? Pipe from D5. 1 Yes 56% Ask D7 2 No 44% Skip to D9 99 Prefer not to answer 1% Skip to D9 D7 In what county is the City that you commute to located? 1 Los Angeles (L.A.) 7% 2 Orange 7% 3 Riverside 21% 4 San Bernardino 4% 5 San Diego 50% 6 Ventura 1% 7 Other 10% 99 Prefer not to answer 1% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 14 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 65 City of Temecula Resident Survey May 2014 D8 In what year were you born? Year recorded and grouped into categories shown below. 1 18 to 24 13% 2 25 to 34 16% 3 35 to 44 21% 4 45 to 54 22% 5 55 to 64 12% 6 65 or older 10% 99 Prefer not to answer 6% Those are all of the questions that I have for you! Thanks so much for participating in this important survey! This survey was conducted for the City of Temecula (Tuh-Mek-you-la) Post Interview Items D9 Gender .1 Male 46% 2 Female 54% True North Research, Inc. O 2014 Page 15 City of Temecula True North Research, Inc. © 2014 66 Item No. 23 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: City Council Travel/Conference Report — July 2014 PREPARED BY: Sue Steffen, Executive Assistant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. On July 23, 2014 Council Member Ron Roberts traveled to St. Paul, Minnesota to attend the National League of Cities Transportation and Infrastructure Services Steering Committee Summer Policy Forum. On July 30, 2014 Mayor Maryann Edwards traveled to Washington D.C. to attend the U.S. Department of Education Conference on Strengthening Partnerships Across K-12, Higher Education and Communities for College Access and Success. ATTACHMENTS: Meeting Agendas NATIONAL LEAGUE of CITIES FEDERAL ADVOCACY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES STEERING COMMITTEE 2014 SUMMER POLICY FORUM The Honorable Robert Bauman, Vice Chair Mayor Pro Tem City of Milwaukee, Wisconsin Thursday, July 24 — Saturday, July 26, 2014 Meeting Site The Saint Paul RiverCentre Meeting Room 13 175 Kellogg Blvd W #501 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 The Honorable Patsy Kinsey Chair Council Member City of Charlotte, North Carolina NLC Staff Leslie Wollack Program Director (202) 626-3029 wollackga,nlc.org The Honorable Mary McComber, Vice Chair Mayor City of Oak Park Heights, Minnesota TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Thursday, July 24 12:00 — 5:00 PM 1:00 — 4:00 PM 5:30 — 6:30 PM REGISTRATION The Saint Paul Hotel, 350 Market Street Promenade Foyer SPECIAL STRATEGY SESSION: NLC'S POLICY DEVELOPMENT PROCESS The Saint Paul Hotel, 350 Market Street Promenade Ballroom • Elizabeth Bailey Principal, 2B Communications NLC Governance Task Force work began in 2009 to review organizational structure and process, resulting in series of recommendations. That work, along with additional extensive research and discussion last year as part of our strategic plan development process, provide important insights as we take action to implement the Strategic Plan. In addition, NLC conducted a survey of Policy Committee members this month specifically around our policy development process — an area identified in both 2009 and in 2013 research as in need of improvement. In this session, those survey results will be presented to and discussed by the Policy Committee members and the NLC Board's Policy and Legislative Committees Members. In this session, those survey results will be presented to and discussed by the Policy Committee members and the NLC Board's Policy and Legislative Committees Members. NLC Welcome Reception The Saint Paul Hotel, 350 Market Street M Street Cafe 6:30 PM DINNER ON YOUR OWN Friday, July 25 7:30 AM — 8:30 AM BREAKFAST The Saint Paul RiverCentre, 175 Kellogg Blvd Ballroom AIB &:30 AM - Noon TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE Meeting Room 13 8:30 - 8:45 AM WELCOME AND MEETING OVERVIEW 2 8:45 — 9:45 AM 9:45 — 10:15 AM 10:15-11:00 AM 11:15 AM —12:00 PM 12:00 — 1:00 PM 1:00 PM 1:00 — 2:00 PM • The Honorable Patsy Kinsey, Chair Council Member, Charlotte, North Carolina REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION INNOVATION UPDATE • The Honorable Steve Elkins, former TIS Chair Metropolitan Transportation Council The committee will receive an update on regional innovations with Steve Elkins, Metro Council and former Bloomington, Minnesota Councilman, who chaired the TIS Committee. ST. CROIX CROSSING UPDATE • Todd Clarkowski, Minnesota Department of Transportation The committee will receive an update on the St. Croix bridge connecting Minnesota and Wisconsin LOCAL ISSUES IN AIRPORT REAUTHORIZATION • Kevin Burke, President and CEO Airports Council International -North America, Washington, DC The committee will get an update on local airport issues for the upcoming debate on reauthorization of federal aviation programs. RESILIENT COMMUNITIES PROJECT • Carissa Schively Slotterback, Faculty Director University of Minnesota Resilient Communities Project The Resilient Communities Project is a cross -disciplinary program partnering with a selected community and the university connecting University resources with communities, regional entities, and organizations interested in sustainability in the Twin Cities and other metropolitan areas in Minnesota (http://www.cura.umn.edu/RCP) LUNCH Ballroom Concourse RECONVENE IN ROOM Ballroom A/B JOINT SESSION: AUGUST RECESS ADVOCACY STRATEGY Ballroom A/B 3 2:00 — 3:00 PM 3:00 — 3:30 PM 3:15 PM 3:45 - 5:00 PM Moderator • Angelina Panettieri, Senior Associate, Grassroots Advocacy National League of Cities, Washington, DC With Congress in recess for the month of August, city officials will have an opportunity to advocate at home for NLC's legislative priorities. In this session, all Steering Committee members will learn about NLC 's August recess advocacy strategy and how you can be a part of advancing our legislative priorities with your House and Senate members. Special Remarks: • Clarence Anthony, Executive Director National League of Cities, Washington, DC FREIGHT ISSUES FOR LOCAL OFFICIALS • Dave Christianson, Freight & Rail Planning Minnesota Department of Transportation BREAK MEET FOR WALK TO UNION DEPOT Ballroom Concourse The TIS Committee will meet at Ballroom Concourse to walk to the Union Depot for tour. Walk is 15 minutes each way from Saint Paul River Centre. JOINT TOUR: TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND MULTI-MODALISM IN SAINT PAUL (optional) • Rafael Ortega, Commissioner Ramsey County Regional Rail Authority Cities of all sizes are incorporating multi -modal transportation, mixed -income housing, and mixed-use in their planning and development. Often called "transit -oriented development" or "sustainable development, " these concepts have been successful in helping cities and towns stretch the value of scarce public dollars. The EENR, CED, FAIR and TIS Committees will hear from stakeholders in Saint Paul 's newest development during a walking tour of Union Depot. Please RSVP to Leslie (Wollack@nlc.ore) whether you plan to attend the tour of Union Depot so the City of Saint Paul can plan accordingly. 4 6:00 — 8:30 PM Saturday, July 26 7:30-8:30 AM NLC GROUP DINNER Science Museum of Minnesota 120 West Kellogg Blvd BREAKFAST Saint Paul RiverCentre Meeting Rooms 4-5-6 8:30 AM — 12:15 AM COMMITTEE MEETS IN Meeting Room 2-3 RETURNING TO MEETING ROOM 13 AT 9:30 AM 8:30 — 9:30 AM TRANSPORTATION AUTHORIZATION UPDATE Meeting Rooms 2-3 9:30 —10:45 AM 10:45 -- 11:45 AM 11:45 AM — 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 1:30 PM • Neil Bomberg, Program Director, Federal Advocacy, National League of Cities, Washington, DC • Leslie Wollack, Program Director, Federal Advocacy, National League of Cities, Washington, DC The committee will join with the Human Development Committee for a follow up discussion on transportation reauthorization STEERING COMMITTEE POLICY DISCUSSION Return to Room 13 Since the steering committee will not have another meeting this year, this will be the opportunity for a discussion of the TIS policy chapter of National Municipal Policy and any updates for the fall including passenger rail and airport reauthorization DISCUSSION: WHAT'S HAPPENING IN TRANSPORTTION FINANCE IN MY CITY Committee members should come prepared to discuss what transportation finance tools you are using in your community WRAP UP AND AUSTIN UPDATE GROUP LUNCH ADJOURN 5 Strengthening Partnerships Across K-12, Higher Education and Communities for College Access and Success July 31, 2014 8:30 a.m. — 5:30 p.m. U.S. Department of Education Barnard Auditorium AGENDA Session Goals: • Foster teams' capacity to advance strong action planning and develop meaningful commitments by: • informing on research, evidence, and best practices; and • connecting to experts for on -the -spot advice and technical assistance. • Energize communities that are working to address pipeline challenges to work together to come up with ideas that reflect a broader understanding of the issues and the strategies needed to get to success. • Jump-start communities' work toward commitments for the next College Opportunity Summit. • Catalyze momentum for this work at the national level and set a foundation to continue the call to action beyond the working session. 7:30 — 8:30 a.m. Registration 8:30 — 9 a.m. Welcome & Kickoff Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education Ted Mitchell, Under Secretary of Education, U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council Officials 9 — 10:30 a.m. Building on What Works: Effective Partnerships and Case Studies Facilitator: Nancy Zimpher, Chancellor, State University of New York 1 10:30 — 10:45 a.m. 10:45 a.m. — Noon Noon —1 p.m. 1— 2:30 p.m. Context: K-12/higher education/community partnerships can be complicated, requiring new ways of doing business. What can we learn from past case studies? How does this help us prioritize our next steps? Discussion Panel Team Discussion What are the most important assets we collectively bring to the tab/e? What are the biggest challenges we anticipate? What are the questions we want to work on today in order to accelerate our progress? Full Group Readout Break Establishing Effective Data Feedback Loops Facilitator: Michelle Asha Cooper, President, Institute for Higher Education Policy Context: Communities should set ambitious, attainable goals to increase the number of students entering and succeeding in college. But setting goals alone will not be effective if they are not backed by strong data feedback loops designed to improve practice. Discussion Panel "Data Walk" & Group Discussion What surprised you about these indicators? What could you take back and implement from other sites? What do you want to know about other sites' efforts? How do existing assessments and data systems illuminate our successes and our needs? How could they be better aligned across k-12 and higher education? What types of resources wou/d you need to achieve greater capacity for a system of continuous assessment and data evaluation between k-12 and higher education? Working Lunch with Administration Guests Breakout Sessions by Topic • Overview of topics and key issues to consider. 2 • Consultancies by Topic: 1) advanced coursework; 2) college access and counseling, 3) k--12 and higher education alignment; 4) possible additional topics based on community interests. 2:30 — 4 p.m. Team Planning Time 4 — 5:15 p.m. Action Planning, Idea Exchange, and Closing Remarks with Administration Officials 3 Item No. 24 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Lynn Kelly -Lehner, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following are the highlights for the Community Development Department for July 2014. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES New Cases: In July 2014, Planning received 58 new applications, and conducted one public hearing. A detailed account of current planning activities is attached to this report. Altair (formerly Village West) Specific Plan: On November 12, 2013, City Council approved an Entitlement Processing Agreement with Ambient Communities (Developer) to process extensive land use entitlements for the 270 acre property located west of Old Town including General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan, Subdivision Maps, Development Agreement, and Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Ambient Communities is proposing a mixed-use development comprised of residential single-family and multi -family units, as well as retail/commercial, open space, and institutional uses. The Developer has agreed to fund the City's expenses for hiring project staff to process the entitlements for an efficient and detailed review of the project. Staff is currently reviewing a Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Consistency Report and has prepared an Initial Study. Staff released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in May and entered into an agreement with Environmental Science Associates in July. (PETERS) Temecula Valley Hospital: City Council approved the Temecula Valley Hospital project on January 22, 2008. A Certificate of Occupancy for the Phase I hospital bed tower was received from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) on July 19, 2013. United Health Services obtained State licensing to open the hospital for patients on October 14, 2013. On May 31, 2013, staff received a Major Modification application to modify the site plan and heliport Conditional Use Permit to relocate the heliport from an area near the northeast corner of the hospital building. UHS indicated that the heliport needs to be relocated based on concerns from the FAA and the aeronautical division of Caltrans. UHS proposed two phases of movement for the heliport: Phase I would place the heliport to the west of the hospital building, in one of the parking lot areas. Phase II would place the heliport on the roof of the second hospital tower. In both cases, the proposed locations result in a change to the flight path that move it away from the Madera Vista residential project and changes the path to either head directly into or away from the prevailing wind direction (rather than perpendicular to the prevailing winds), as directed by the FAA and Caltrans. This application is under review and a Supplemental EIR is being prepared by Environmental Science Associates and is anticipated to go out for public review in summer 2014. Staff anticipates scheduling the project fora public hearing before the Planning Commission in November 2014 and before City Council in December 2014. (FISK) Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: In 2013, the Planning Commission approved KB Homes, Standard Pacific, and Van Daele Developments' applications for Home Product Reviews in the Roripaugh Specific Plan Area. KB Home plans to construct 98 single-family homes. Standard Pacific plans to build 200 single-family homes under the names Montego and Cambridge. Van Daele Development will construct 113 single-family homes, 56 marketed as Verona, and 57 as Sorrento. The three builders will construct 411 homes in four of five available planning areas in the area commonly referred to the "panhandle." Two hundred and nine (209) residential permits have been issued to date. (PETERS) LONG RANGE PLANNING Long Range Planning works toward larger scale and longer time -frame projects. Some of the major projects and long-range planning activities currently in progress are described below. Hike Bike Temecula (Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update): On May 14, 2013, City Council awarded a contract to KTU+A to update the City's Multi -Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. A community workshop was held on October 26, 2013, and attendees provided feedback on bike lanes, sidewalks, trails, hiking paths, and equestrian connections. Community input was also collected through a survey via the project website www.hikebiketemecula.org. A Steering Committee meeting was held on February 25, 2014 at the Merc Theater, with over 30 participants in attendance. The focus of the meeting was to summarize the survey results and to get feedback on proposed improvements in Old Town. The Old Town improvements include sharrows (shared bike lane markings) on Old Town Front Street, Bicycle Friendly Community signs, and strategically placed bike racks. On March 25, 2014, City Council approved an amendment to the contract that included Phase II of the Master Plan Update and additional sidewalk analysis. Phase I concluded with a community walk -ride event on May 10, 2014, highlighting priority locations for future trails and bike lanes based on the community's feedback. Phase II is under way. (PETERS) Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan: The Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Area encompasses approximately 560 acres and is located north of Rancho California Road, west of Interstate 15, south of Cherry Street, and east of Diaz Road. In January 2011, City Council established the Jefferson Avenue Ad Hoc Subcommittee, comprised of Council Member Roberts and Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero. Staff has held eight Ad Hoc Subcommittee Meetings to develop policies, and obtain direction on the content of the Specific Plan. Between October 2011 and July 2013, staff held six visioning workshops. These workshops solicited feedback from the public and key stakeholders about the future vision of the Specific Plan area. Eight recommendations emerged from the public visioning process: 1) strengthen economic development, 2) expand the mix of uses, 3) define districts and neighborhoods, 4) improve transportation, mobility, connectivity and circulation, 5) integrate recreation, open space and trails, 6) create updated and flexible development standards, 7) build and maintain a comprehensive utility infrastructure network and 8) establish a district identity. On June 13, 2013, staff held a Developer Focus Group to determine the future economic feasibility of the Specific Plan based upon anticipated market conditions, economic demands, demographic trends, and available financing. From July 2013 through December 2013, staff held six public Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Steering Committee Meetings with members of the public. Two commissioners from each of the City's commissions (Planning, Community Services, and Public/Traffic Safety Commissions) sit on the Committee. Staff presented form -based code principles and drafts of the district map, land use matrix, street cross sections, conceptual streetscape beatification plan, circulation network, hypothetical future block standards, urban parking standards, urban design guidelines, plan administration, sign standards, adaptive reuse standards, plan financing, and the anticipated 30 - year build out scenario. The project website, www.envisionjefferson.orq, continues to provide project information and updates to the public. Staff is currently drafting the Specific Plan based upon the eight visioning recommendations, plan framework, and the concepts presented at the six public Steering Committee meetings. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is being prepared simultaneously with the Specific Plan. Plan completion and certification of the EIR is anticipated in late 2014. (INNES, WEST, WATSON) Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR): Environmental Science Associates (ESA) is preparing a Program EIR for the Uptown Jefferson Specific Plan. An EIR Scoping meeting was held in June 2013, providing interested parties an opportunity to submit comments related to the scope of the EIR. As a courtesy, all property owners within the specific plan area were mailed notices for this meeting. Staff is currently reviewing and providing feedback on the draft EIR. Certification of the Final EIR is anticipated in late 2014. (INNES, WEST, WATSON) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) & HOUSING Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinance: City staff has completed the 2014- 2021 General Plan Housing Element Update. The City Council adopted the document on January 28, 2014, and the City received certification from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) on March 10, 2014. Staff has prepared a project schedule for the Affordable Housing Overlay and Density Bonus Ordinance as required by Programs 1 and 4 of the Housing Element. The project is in the initial planning phase. Staff is currently conducting research and anticipates completing the Ordinance for adoption by February 2015. (WEAVER) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG): The City will receive $544,070 in CDBG grant funding for Fiscal Year 2014-15. The funding will be allocated as follows: 20 percent for program administration ($108,814), 15 percent for public services ($81,610) to be divided evenly between five non-profit service providers, and the remaining 65 percent for infrastructure improvements (53%) and housing activities (12%). The Sam Hicks Park Playground Enhancement project will receive $311,550 this fiscal year for a total of $486,550 in CDBG funding for the project. Habitat for Humanity will receive $26,223 for a Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program and GRID Alternatives will receive $15,873 for a Solar Affordable Housing Program. The Annual Action Plan was approved by HUD and the Grant Agreement was initiated. Staff is preparing the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), which is tentatively scheduled for City Council on September 9, 2014. The CAPER is due to HUD by September 30, 2014. (WEAVER) ENERGY & CONSERVATION Temecula Energy Efficiency Management (TEEM) Fund: The TEEM Fund is a self-sustaining fund that utilizes rebate incentives while also re -directing annual utility costs savings from energy efficiency projects into the fund. City Council established the fund in June 2013, with an initial deposit of $119,728.90 in SCE and SCG rebates. Staff is working with Public Financial Management, funded through the Western Riverside Energy Partnership, to develop an policy manual for the TEEM Fund, focusing on policies and methodologies for determining the amount of utility savings to be deposited into the fund after projects are completed. (WEST) Western Riverside Energy Leadership Partnership: This Partnership, consisting of eleven Western Riverside Council of Government (WRCOG) member cities, Southern California Edison (SCE), and Southern California Gas (SCG), provides incentives for participants to develop energy efficiency programs. Temecula was the first City in the Partnership to achieve Gold Level status by completing 13 energy efficiency projects in FY 2012-13, resulting in nearly $100,000 of annual utility cost savings. For FY 2013-14, the City has upgraded the Community Recreation Center parking lot lights with new LED lighting fixtures. This resulted in 9,155 kWh saved and an additional $2,280 in annual savings. To achieve Platinum level in the Partnership, the City will need to complete an additional 82,958 kWh savings, implement an Auto Demand Response plan, and adopt the Municipal Energy Action Plan. (WEST) Energy Action Plans (EAP): The final draft Municipal and Community Energy Action Plans have been prepared for the City of Temecula. The Plans were funded through the Western Riverside Energy Partnership as part of the first year program development. Both EAPs establish energy reduction goals, policies, and implementation measures to achieve energy reduction goals. (WEST) Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions Inventory/Climate Action Plan: A draft Municipal GHG inventory and Community GHG inventory has been prepared for the City and was funded through the Energy Partnership and grant funds received by WRCOG. Energy data from the Plans have been used to establish a baseline for the emission inventories. The inventories will be incorporated into the Western Riverside County Climate Action Plan to address state legislation AB 32 and SB 375. The Plan identifies emission reduction targets and measures. (WEST) Solid Waste and Recycling: Staff manages the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Agreement with CR&R and acts as a liaison between the City, CR&R, and their customers. City staff and CR&R coordinate two Citywide Clean-up events each year for residents to dispose of household waste and large miscellaneous items that do not fit into the standard residential trash receptacle. The next Citywide Clean-up will be held on September 20, 2014 at Chaparral High School. Staff also assists with outreach for the Riverside County Mobile Household Hazardous Waste Collection events and the Backyard Composting Workshops. The Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event is an effort to promote the recycling of used and other household hazardous waste. The next Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event is scheduled for September 13, 2014. (WEST) BUILDING & SAFETY Inspections: During the month of July, Building and Safety conducted 2,421 inspections. On average, there were 110 inspections per day, or 20 inspections per inspector per day. Permits: During the month of July, Building and Safety issued 244 building permits. Of these permits, 11 were dwelling units. Some of these permits included: Tenant Improvements Chipotle Mexican Grill — 26440 Ynez Rd. Crossfit CMD - 32475 103A Temecula Parkway Iron Grip - 27969 Jefferson Ave Shop Girl - 28693 105 Old Town Front St. Smart Fix - 40820 K10 Winchester Rd. Temecula Korean Adventist - 42110 Remington Ave USA Life Management Corp. — 42225 A6 Remington Ave Workout Anytime - 31781 Temecula Parkway Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy A Perfect Shade — 28710 Via Montezuma A.R. Motor Sports - 43154 Via Dos Picos Blink Boutique - 40820 Suite 2750 Winchester Rd. Brooke & Tess Styling Studio - 28362 F Vincent Moraga Dr. Burritos Santana — 41125 B8 Winchester Rd. CGS Real Estate - 28545 201A Old Town Front St. Executive Ink - 27574 233 Commerce Center Dr. Faith Auto Sales - 27520 B W Enterprise Cr. Fit Body Boot Camp - 28822 203 Old Town Front St. Hobbytown — 27548 11 Ynez Rd. ICIG LLC - 26490 C Ynez Rd. JDS Video & Media Production - 28069 D&E Diaz Rd. Moore's Sewing Center - 26490 F Ynez Rd. Starting Point LLC — 41743 204 N Enterprise Cr. Winchester AM/PM — 40212 Winchester Rd. CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of July, Code Enforcement responded to 80 web complaints from constituents. In addition, the division opened 121 cases, 83 of which were residential and 38 were commercial. Code Enforcement also pulled 1,250 non -conforming signs in the community. The annual weed abatement program began in April. On July 22, 2014, the Resolution for lien was presented to Council and Approved. Twenty eight parcels were sent to the County for lien in the amount of $29,667. Detailed Code Enforcement activity can be found in the following chart. July 2014 - Code Enforcement Cases TYPE OF CODE CASE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TYPE TOTAL Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 5 0 5 Vacant Home / Property Maintenance / Rodent infested 8 0 8 Business or Home Occupation w/o license 3 1 4 Abandoned Home / Vandalism 1 0 1 Trash and Debris / Parking lot maintenance 10 2 12 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 9 0 9 Green Pool / Vector Control 10 0 10 Graffiti 2 11 13 Noise 0 2 2 Trailer / RV Stored 17 0 17 Construction w/o Permit 2 2 4 Encroach Public ROW / Trash Cans 3 0 3 Other / Homeless Encampment 1 0 1 Other / Smoking Ordinance / Safety Issue 3 0 3 Other / Safety Issue - Pool no fence/gate 3 2 5 Other/Parking 6 5 11 Signs Pulled - Violations 0 13 13 TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES 121 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, real estate owned properties, and properties in default in commercial and residential development. The following charts demonstrate the past six months of foreclosure tracking activities in Temecula. Residential Foreclosure Tracking Commercial Foreclosure Tracking February March April May June July 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 DEFAULT 101 107 121 118 118 114 FORECLOSED 94 84 64 71 72 83 REO 76 81 84 79 76 89 TOTALS 271 272 269 268 266 286 Commercial Foreclosure Tracking February March April May June July 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 2014 DEFAULT 8 6 4 3 3 2 FORECLOSED 3 2 1 2 1 1 REO 25 30 26 27 20 19 TOTALS 33 38 31 32 24 22 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 1. Recently Approved APN # 921060018 • PA14-0150 islander Major TUP ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow a sidewalk sale to be conducted for Islanders Designs from July 18 to July 26, 2014 at 28011 Jefferson Avenue, Suite A. The sale will operate each day from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Submitted Date Approved Date Jul 7 2014 Jul 17 2014 APN # • PA14-0154 Island by Design TUP 910420030 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use Permit for Island by Design to hold a patio and home show tent sale from August 1 thru August 10, 2014 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. daily at 40820 Winchester Road. Submitted Date Approved Date Jul 10 2014 Jul 31 2014 • PA14-0059 Margarita Strawberry Stand APN # 959050014 JAMES ATKINS A Temporary Use Permit for a strawberry stand to operate between March 15, 2014 and July 31, 2014, daily between the hours of 10 a.m. and 6 p.m. at 43980 Margarita Road. Submitted Date Approved Date Mar 19 2014 Jul 8 2014 • PA14-0057 Temecula Valley Event Center APN # 909270044 JAMES ATKINS A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula Valley Event Center LLC an indoor venue for public and private gatherings including live indoor entertainment for events, classes, parties, meetings, workshops, and banquets, and to operate under a Type 57 ABC license (special on sale general beer/wine/distilled spirits) at 27345 Jefferson Avenue. (Formerly Hooters Restaurant) Submitted Date Approved Date Mar 13 2014 Jul 16 2014 • PA14-0128 Norris Pumkin and Xmas trees APN # 961010036 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Norris Amusement to operate a pumpkin patch from October 1 to October 31, 2014 and to operate Christmas tree sales from November 22 to December 24, 2014, seven days a week from, 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. at 31309 Temecula Parkway. Submitted Date Approved Date Jun 16 2014 Jul 14 2014 1 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 2. Scheduled for Hearing APN # 955020006 • PA10-0348 Linfield TTM 36098 ERIC JONES A Phased Tentative Map application (for conveyance purposes) to allow Linfield Christian School to create five map phases comprised of one three lot phase and four one lot phases. Parcels will range in size from 2.00 to 62.74 acres. The project site is located at 31950 Pauba Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Directors Hearing Dec 15 2010 Aug 14 2014 • PA14-0053 Walcott Major Mod APN # 957170032 JAMES ATKINS A Major Modification application to allow Van Daele Development to revise the previously approved product type and landscape plan for Walcott Estates, generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APN: 957-170-032 through 036) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Mar 11 2014 8/9/2012 Aug 6 2014 • PA12-0131 Arbor Vista GPA APN # 919350017 MATTHEW PETERS A General Plan Land Use map change from Very Low (VL) density residential to Low (L) density residential. The project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. (APN 919-350-017, -018, -019, -020) (Associated applications: PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; PA12-0133, TTM 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 May 21 2014 • PA12-0132 Arbor Vista ZC to PDO APN # 919350017 MATTHEW PETERS A Zoning Map and Text change from Very Low (VL) density residential to a Planned Development Overlay (PDO) based on the standards of the Low (L) density residential designation with provisions for a cluster development. The project site is located on 73 acres at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350-017, -018, - 019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0133, TTM 36479; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 May 21 2014 APN # • PA12-0133 Arbor Vista TTM 36479 919350017 MATTHEW PETERS A Tentative Tract Map (No. 36479) to subdivide 73 acres into 83 single-family cluster lots. Minimum lot size for the residential lots is 5,500 square feet. Approximately 59% of the site will be preserved as permanent open space to preserve the existing drainage on-site. Access to the site will be provided from Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350-017, -018, -019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; and PA12-0134, Home Product Review). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 May 21 2014 APN # 2 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 • PA12-0134 Arbor Vista HPR 919350017 MATTHEW PETERS A Residential Home Product review for 83 lots to be created with TTM 36479 (PA10-0133) for 4 floor plans ranging in size from approximately 2,700 to 3,500 square feet with three elevation types each including Craftsman, Spanish and Traditional. The project site is located at the southeast corner of Nicolas and Via Lobo Roads (APN 919-350- 017, -018, -019, -120) (Associated applications: PA12-0131, GPA; PA12-0132, Zone Change to PDO; and PA12- 0133, TTM 36479). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jul 12 2012 8/9/2012 May 21 2014 APN # • PA14-0008 Diamond Hearts DP 909310015 JAMES ATKINS A Development Plan Application for three two-story industrial structures in a light industrial zone. Each structure totals 10,917 square feet and will be used for warehousing and processing. The project is located at 42236, 42260, and 42284 Winchester Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Planning Commision Jan 16 2014 Aug 6 2014 3 of 7 • PA14-0155 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting APN # 961440015 Art Gaitan's Mexico Cafe KENNY TAYLOR A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 11,722 square foot Gaitan's Mexican Cafe restaurant on a 2.61 acre vacant lot and a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a Type 47 ABC license (on -sale general beer/wine/distilled spirits) located north of Pechanga Parkway adjacent to Hazit Market. (APN 961-440-015) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 15 2014 TBD • PA14-0156 Wahoos Major TUP APN # 921810026 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Wahoo's Fish Tacos to conduct free community concerts consisting of live music, food, alcohol, and vendors within their parking lot on July 26, September 20, and October 11, 2014 between the hours of 6 p.m. and 9 p.m. at 29073 Overland Drive. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 15 2014 TBD • PA14-0162 Big Horse Corn Maze TUP APN # 965410003 JAMES ATKINS A Major TUP for Big Horse Corn Maze to include pumpkin picking, corn maze, face painting, pony rides, carnival games, a 5K run and classic auto show from October 1 thru 31, 2014 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturday and Sunday, and from 1 p.m. to 6 p.m. Monday thru Friday at 33320 Temecula Parkway. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 21 2014 TBD • PA14-0166 Chevron DP and CUP APN # 910130048 JAMES ATKINS PA14-0166 a Major CUP with a Development Plan for Chevron Station to allow for construction of an additional 2,406 sq. ft. commercial retail building and a 836 sq. ft. car wash to be located at 27650 Jefferson Avenue. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 23 2014 TBD PA14-0167 Gateway PDO Amendment APN # 922170013 ERIC JONES A Zoning Amendment application to change the zoning of four parcels generally located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and La Paz from Professional Office to Planned Development Overlay District ("PDO -13") for retail, gas station, and hotel uses. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 24 2014 TBD PA14-0168 Quality Nissan TUP APN # 910420030 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow Quality Nissan of Temecula to host a used car tent sale within the Promenade Mall parking lot near Edwards Cinema at 40820 Winchester Road on August 14 to August 17 from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 28 2014 TBD 4 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 APN # • PA14-0171 Wal-Mart TUPX-Mas 960010047 ERIC JONES A Major Temporary Use Permit to allow an existing Wal-Mart to have outside storage containers for Christmas stock from September 15th through January 10th. The project is located at 32225 Temecula Parkway. Related Application (PA13-0221) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 31 2014 6/12/2014 TBD • PA14-0108 Wolf Creek DA amend APN # 962010007 ERIC JONES A Development Agreement Amendment application for the existing Wolf Creek Development Agreement. The applicant is requesting to extend the expiration date for 10 years. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned May 19 2014 TBD APN # • PA14-0107 Temecula Medical Office Bldg 959050008 JAMES ATKINS A Development Plan for a 25,000 square foot medical office building on 2 acres located at 31775 De Portola Road. Generally located on the south side of De Portola Road, approximately 500 feet west of Margarita Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned May 19 2014 6/12/2014 TBD PA14-0099 Roripaugh Ranch DA 0M7 APN # 964460002 STUART FISK An Operating Memorandum (0M7) for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Development Agreement to document the terms and timing of development and City acceptance of the park in Planning Area 6 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned May 22014 TBD • PA14-0058 Comfort Suites DP APN # 921070011 ERIC JONES A Development Plan to construct a three story 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel within the Old Town Specific Plan area. The hotel will total 31,270 square feet and will be located at 41841 Moreno Road. Amenities will include an indoor heated swimming pool, fitness room and business center. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Mar 18 2014 TBD APN # • PA14-0051 Roripaugh Ranch DDA 964180004 STUART FISK A modification to the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement to modify the timing of infrastructure improvements and building permit thresholds for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, generally located along the north and south sides of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and on the east and west sides of Butterfield Stage Road, surrounding the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Mar 52014 TBD APN # 5 of 7 Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 PA14-0050 WolfCreek TTM 962010007 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map (TTM No. 36675) for 174 residential condominium units located on the southeast corner of Pechanga Parkway and Wolf Valley Road Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Mar 5 2014 TBD APN # • PA14-0023 River Springs Charter School 921310017 KENNY TAYLOR A Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow River Springs Charter School to occupy an existing 27,500 square foot building for charter school educational services for adolescent students Kindergarten thru 8th grade at 4215 Lyndie Lane (Related Application: TUP PA14-0028). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Feb 5 2014 TBD APN # • PA14-0147 Promenade Mall Pumpkin Patch 910420030 KENNY TAYLOR A Major Temporary Use for a pumpkin patch to be operated from September 26 to October 31, 2014, between the hours of 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. daily. The event will also include inflatables, a petting zoo, tractor rides, an obstacle course, face painting, music, DJ, kiddie zippy ride, carnival games, and food. The event site is located within the southeast parking area of the Promenade Mall near Edwards Cinema at 40820 Winchester Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 2 2014 TBD • PA14-0126 Crossfit Temecula CUP APN # 921281012 KENNY TAYLOR A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula Cross -Fit to operate a specialized fitness gymnasium within an existing vacant 6,960 square foot office/industrial suite at 43475 Business Park Drive. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jun 12 2014 TBD • PA10-0213 Simms TTM APN # 945120001 ERIC JONES A Tentative Tract Map application to create 7 residential lots from 4 lots with lot size ranging from 2.66 acres to 3.62 net acres on vacant property generally located on the south side of Santiago Road, approximately 1,500 feet east of Ynez Road. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jul 14 2010 8/12/2010 TBD PA14-0140 The Vineyard Model Home APN # 957130001 JAMES ATKINS A model home complex and sales office (Major Temporary Use Permit) for The Vineyard (formerly Walcott Estates) on lots 39, 40 & 41(with lot 38 being used as the parking lot) located west of Butterfield Stage Road, east of Walcott Lane, north of La Serena Way and south of Calle Chapos (APNs: 957-170-032; 033; 034 and 036). Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jun 27 2014 TBD • PA14-0135 TABU Sushi Bar and Grill CUP 6 of 7 APN # 922046010 JAMES ATKINS Planning Agenda Report 7/1/2014 through 7/31/2014 A Conditional Use Permit for indoor live entertainment and a Type 47 ABC License (Special Use - General) for Tabu Sushi Bar and Grill, a full-service restaurant serving sushi, traditional Japanese food, steak, and other seafood dishes. The site is located at 28693 Old Town Front Street, Suite 101 and 102. Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Jun 23 2014 TBD APN # • PA13-0249 TCI Development Agreement 922220002 MATTHEW PETERS A Development Agreement application for the Temecula Creek Inn project, which includes a Specific Plan, General Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map and Development Plan to expand Temecula Creek Inn into a master -planned 18 -hole golf course resort and community on 305 acres located 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road. The Specific Plan proposes four Planning Areas: Planning Area 1 includes an expansion of the existing hotel by 99 rooms from 128 to 227 guest rooms (active adult option on 126 units) and the addition of a spa and banquet facilities totaling 153,837 square feet. Planning Areas 2-4 include a maximum 409 single family and multi -family residential units ranging in size from 1,600 to 4,300 square feet. Related Cases PA08-0118, PA08-0119, PA08-0120, PA08-0121 (APNs 922- 220-002; 003; 008; 031; and 922-230-002; 003; 004; 007; 008) Submitted Date Anticipated DRC Meeting Date Hearing Planned Oct 22 2013 11/14/2013 TBD 7 of 7 _bYURRIETA Ho •u-"'- ___ _ NGS RD �iW,SPS \•,` PA12-0133 / PA12-0131.-' PA12=y0134 . .••,�� iinliiiiiiC; 1. Recently Approved 2. Scheduled for Hearing 3. New Submittals Pending DRC Meeting Item No. 25 Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jeffrey Kubel, Chief of Police DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Police Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Will Edwards, Sergeant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Police Department for the month of July 2014. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 2,962 "Priority One" calls for service 51 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.62 Minutes VOLUNTEERS Volunteer administration hours 236 Special Events hours 189 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 1,080 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 62 Training hours 1482 Total Volunteer hours 2834 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention workshops /Neighborhood watch meetings conducted 13/5 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 4/3 Businesses visited 4 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0/5 Station Tour 3 Planning Review Projects/Temp Outdoor Use Permits 2/6 Square Footage of Graffiti Removed 6,297 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 296 Sets of fingerprints taken 30 Police reports filed 18 Citations signed off 22 Car Seat Inspections 0 Total receipts $3,601.00 SPECIAL TEAMS (POP / SET) On sight felony arrests 12 On sight misdemeanor arrests 6 Felony arrest warrants served 2 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 3 Follow-up investigations 1 Parole/Probation Searches 0/0 Pedestrian Checks 23 Traffic Stops/Vehicle Checks 8 Crime Free Housing Checks 75 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 1061 Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints 1 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 D.U.I. Arrests 15 Non -hazardous citations 533 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 98 Neighborhood Enforcement Team (N.E.T.) citations 162 Parking citations 179 School Zone 0 Seatbelts 25 Cell Phone Cites 215 Injury collisions 24 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 204 Total Cases Assigned 69 Total Cases Closed 59 Search Warrants Served 8 Arrests 2 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 688 Felony arrest/filings 10 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 25 Traffic Citations 1 Fingerprints/Livescans 284 Total receipts $7,851.00 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS (No School) Felony arrests 0 Misdemeanor arrests 0 Reports 0 Youth counseled 0 Meetings 0 Item No. 26 Supplemental Material for Item No. 20 (Old Town Local Review Board Appointments) City of Temecula JUN - 3 2014 ftCity of Temecula � F=n lance lei. , 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review Temecula, CA 92590 Board Application www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 kap`;..+ .EI�oEd .: T . .. >. ,._ • .. . . ... . JUN 04 2014 'Fo.‘,.,.° proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered V,oter•,�-. . • 3epT +.'Q't.y.CLEfKS DEPT. Temecula Resident? If yes, number of years 27 Are you a Registered Voter? YE5 NAME: 5605.SAL) bfVlap66. OCCUPATION: E.l.-1ik1Fr Q.. , i(i(.'j_ ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: 111111.1111111111._EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: UP...i rAQty,`t'Ec) EMPLOYER ADDRESS: _ E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: ', t$b. I4 ce (A6 ;. tit'. twl ci' .(5E_.k /40061 o1J Vt55AtiO J f 51,3)• 9 i,toSo01.1 A eptk it rt°6 *K A.5- On 3c4.encc-- 'Eu61In1e Nr, niAtUAG t.) X•S. 1r,,5o c.+Rt6 In Science-,. 60-1- e L'vYn r(v<- &4 C b r�g.st • -. I• ColO • 4 E�(16iL- List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and thee)of�eis A service: • Ce32TcPitf fpr„ a fog. Co011/41"N of 84K-) #&C JO - I ctI- e`-ODot (Plait) Coos7• ocii MM 1z of C402-6/11/4T612-. R.N6E.f G40+6436g., of CowAwt C6 Ueie.C.e : . Irl -rtv6 i youwh�iki ExPev-LEJC.A UkbusktTeJ (EO) tJt.A'JD Mpll?-C — Molts-v�A metAkTree• A 4000 LisTe5/0 e. To nw.te-c=, 11)6CtSIc &-) My12. List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): USC O TO Be A6c e A w AFFAIR-, v44Rtor./5 CO/1.416446S Pon, s e.ViG6 5 . • an zee of 06 Fie. Sec r,6 Pum sokr' State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) S woui-o PeAcTte.i3 qua Co•s1pt.cTG The m195todU OF 5004 AL. C.4-440,-) E, I Joie To THE, Pi-cc) pl2mGgAA4 ,kilo A( cN nontntomiTp rag. PvBGc 14011/41— iTo 5E-P./VQ Tom P�11s� �o 6wTf i 10 soc A.L. a.c� k + v � Y ekoPi►reA I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information op public inform. •• •urposes. Signature: _� /r .oic( 9 _ �. . ,. _... . _ _ Date: �� Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE `,1 �1 11/ , City of Temecula 4 41000 Main Street 411 Old Town Local Review Temecula, CA 92590 Board A www.cityoftemecula.org pplication (951) 694-6444 RECEIVED For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter . MAY 2$ 2014 CITY CLERKS ILMP . Temecula Resident? k If yes, number of years 3P.Are you a Registered Voter? KeS ' NAME: L .. V ( ' IC OCCUPATION: S Cl.1 --vvi 0 •t G(/VOjut1' ce -- ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: icr)dCc_ AA, Y V4.int l/c EMPLOYER ADDRESS: S -Q [- E-MAIL Educational Backgroun,d/Degrees: ni AS '-k l'ke. C-ititt_ VOLI(C .-/Ii'31A.5C-)/1-001 1'16 Dtplott___ _63(A 51,i ts s iaLotfrilk/uo, Mi--. Sa,n -cf_Cl •t, - (44(-0,-- cotte.5e,, )4u,rn.a,ufvicts -A, Socrcellpehtiuw-q/5crefr, List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of A5 service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): kme is(( u rt_ R:e&L C(L)SS t `1 36)` D►Sc 5,kr Iicfly/I: i'1i) S le,-} )-evU-b/eet,I'1k'I S Tem-cc iA.k. CI�'444.. Coica5 C� ^ton S� f u,�kd C� .�et►(��� 5e�v� 1�1C/L(l/e/n-L/t1/4--k State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) 11-s Cc I 6718 hoe. res ' ale „4-- kV (r1 Y"ie C.',t te(, VIAve. se(,/ mu4c c1aPr s. .-1- c )ou-/d he, heGCrrte_ /?'10T"z, invo(del will SC'< d pe,u�-es art o'� pip 2¢,9es tc"0 K�C.I� rit �,od i'lPQII- a �� fl yLl/s I'i/,1e . I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public informationt� p rposes. Signature: `' . _/lit 4<< v�2��� Date: 6a61-2.01/f 9 ` i��� to Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE 06-10-14P02 :05 RCVD City of Temecula r • eJ.& 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Reviewo cFIVED I V Temecula, CA 92590 www_cityoftemecula.org Board Application JUN 10 2014 (951) 694-6444 CITY ua.truio uc*T. For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident?YES If yes, number of years / Are you a Registered Voter? YEs NAME: DON F2e:Nc%f OCCUPATION: RE.77,ZED ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: _MIMI= EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: PSR EMPLOYER ADDRESS: E•MAI Educational Background/Degrees: /9. PP3c/G Rpr'/At'cTf2MT/on/, O efti/rt HN,v /25.7 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: rj9/9R's /'4 1ts'soc/i3?/o/✓ D/ 6%%W.E,2Np7E'-7 AE), SPEe,F/-A- ior'/s p&rn/e_s CDIN�iTEiL lg.7— )95 /1'1 AB. $- 'c,s.7S c'or 1ft?i77E5 Zdo/ M v¢e- , rs// cp rh 07'77-EE Z'ao S-0-oa List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) QLD 77,2„,„. / , t ,, 4u� �E7�.✓�fT/d��/ -rn 7- REd)u,REIS TW ic6/YT-, L /fit/4) C'1 2EFct c. 57E k/i4-/7lJ Sif.P. / fraD,eict ✓Oc A?/ E}11Q .1Z/5Nc'/: f /14)G✓4.:E2Ac5 6'44,' W T'N2aksi,' '9 4',Is j /ZE�d/2L) ds R 'covh F4/Si!`rncA,T G✓62k,A., /;v 5-74.,it, A/y,p L oc,¢CaCIC a/v4g/ T. SSE /17-7-11e > . I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: / �C.Q —__ Date: 6 f -_ ease mall or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE RESUME--DONALD.!. FRENCH DONALD J. FRENCH Summary of Experience Extensive municipal engineering and public works experience Effective municipal project design and construction manager Experienced manager of multiple and diverse divisions of public works departments Work Experience 5-2007 to Present French and Associates-Owner Provided senior engineering inspection services to Cliff Williams Construction Engineering for the Aspen at the Sawmill project, a multi-million dollar, mixed-use development in Flagstaff, Arizona. 6-2005 to 4-2007: City of Goodyear-Streets Superintendent/Project Mgr. Management of the daily operations of the Streets and Project Management Divisions of the Public Works Department. Management of capital improvement projects and supervision of Project Manager for parks, street construction, storm drains, facilities and transportation related projects (see attached list), from inception through completion. Supervised and evaluated division and section heads over streets, signage, signals, and roadway markings; prepared annual capital improvement and operating budgets; and communicated effectively with staff, peers, the public, City Council and other agencies. 1-2003 to 6-2005: French& Associates—Owner Continuation of previously assigned public works operational and project management duties for City of Goodyear after retirement, through multiple contracts.Not under contract from November 2004 to March 2005 at my option. 2001 to 2003: City of Goodyear-Superintendent of Operations, Public Works Responsible for the operations of the Streets, Parks, Recreation, Facilities and Equipment Management Divisions of the Public Works Department. Managed multiple capital improvement projects including a privately funded interstate freeway interchange, community park, street construction, storm drain, facilities and transportation related projects (see attached list), from inception through completion. Assumed responsibility for traffic engineering in the absence of a City Traffic Engineer. Supervised and evaluated division heads, prepared annual capital improvement and operating budgets and communicated effectively with the public, City Council and other agencies. RESUME—DONALD J. FRENCH 1997 to 2001: City of Glendale-Traffic Lighting Manager Management of Street Lighting Division in Transportation Department, including plans review, inspection, utility coordination and project management. Managed departmental and capital improvement budgets for Transportation Department. Managed consultant selection process, design, bidding and construction phases for 'Transportation Department projects. Supervisory responsibilities over Traffic Engineering Specialist. 1992 to 1997: City of Glendale-Senior Management Assistant/Project Manager Provided management of complex and diverse capital improvement projects, including improvement districts, neighborhood partnership grant projects, new facilities, remodeling,historic preservation,parks,storm drain and streets projects.Responsible for conducting public meetings for assigned projects to obtain public input and informed consent. Prepared and monitored project, departmental and capital improvement budgets. Represented Engineering Department as Budget Expert, Human Resources Liaison and member of Neighborhood Partnership Committee for the Revitalization of Older Neighborhoods. Coordinated with electric and water utility companies for grant funding of aesthetic enhancements for the City of Glendale. Reported to various federal, state and regional entities on capital improvement project funding and transportation planning issues. Prepared grant applications for project funding. 1986 to 1992: City of Glendale -Construction Engineering Snpervisor Provided supervision of engineering inspectors and construction materials technicians; on-going review of projects for conformance with plans and specifications on capital improvement and private development projects. Prepared evaluations of assigned employees, consultants and contractors. 1985 to 1986: City of Tempe- Engineering Projects Technician Engineering administration including preparation of professional services contracts, informal construction contracts, specifications and agreements. Performed plans reviews, issued right-of-way permits, and provided infrastructure information. Considerable accounting and processing of payables from consultants and contractors. Set up individual budgets for projects, monitored fiscal activity and adjusted budgets as required. 1979 to 1985: City of Tempe-Engineering Inspector Provided inspection of capital improvement and private development projects which included underground utilities,streets, parks, landscaping,grading and drainage,and facilities projects. Education Ottawa University,Ottawa Kansas, BA Public Administration Northern Arizona University, Master of Liberal Studies program(14 CU) Memberships,Affiliations and Awards Maricopa Association of Governments,Specification and Details Sub-committee(1987-1995) Maricopa Association of Governments, Streets Committee (2001-2005) "Executive of the Year, 1999-2000"Awarded by IAAP, Valley West Chapter RESUME—DONALD J. FRENCH Representative Projects Managed (Partial Listing) o Glendale North Branch Library(Conceptual Phase) o Glendale Fire Station 156 o Glendale Fire Station 157 a Neighborhood Partnership Projects, 1995/96, 1996/97 o 67th Avenue Street Improvements, Williams Drive to Isabel' Lane o Sahuaro Ranch Historic Barnyard Building Restoration o Sahuaro Ranch Historic Buildings Restoration,Main House and Fruit Packing House o Sahuaro Ranch Historic Barnyard Site Development o Glendale Fire Station 152/Bethany West Police Facility Expansion and Renovations o Arrowhead Towne Center(Regional Mall)Improvement District Projects (Construction) o Neighborhood Partnership Projects, 1995/96,Phase I1 o Glendale Avenue Street Improvements, 51st Avenue to 43rd Avenue (Construction) o Olive Avenue Storm Drainage, 59th Avenue to 67th Avenue(Construction) o Foothills Park Site Development(Ball fields)(Construction) o Rose Lane Park Ball Fields and Playground(Construction) o City of Tempe- Kiwanis Park Phase 3-C(Construction) o Glendale City Courts Security Remodel a 67th Avenue Storm Drainage,Olive Avenue to Peoria Avenue(Construction) o Peoria Avenue 18 Inch Waterline,59th Avenue to 63rd Avenue(Construction) a 47th Avenue Storm Drainage,Glendale Avenue to Maryland Avenue o Catlin Court Streetscape, Phase 11 and Ill (Construction) o Improvement District 56—Cactus Road and 596 Avenue Improvements(Constr) o City of Goodyear,Goodyear Community Park, Phases 1 and H o Litchfield Road from Yuma Road to MC 85 06-10-14PO4 :45 RCVD City of Temecula ii., �_ I„ - ,, 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review s. :�'.� Temecula, CA 92590 Board Application www.cityoftemeculaorg (951) 694-6444 ra 'EIVrEt9 For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter )UN 10 2014 / CITY CLERKS DEPT. Temecula Resident? �/ If yes, number of years, (.p Are you a Registered Voter? tS. 1 NAME: cl P_ Girar OCCUPATION:--1:-,-Vi. i .Pt1P le ip/YI011.1'(,C.;;i/'cli no,-40a ADDRESS DAYTIME PHONEIIIMMW___ EVENING PHONE: '2.flsi . EMPLOYER NAMEQCf1�I�P EMPLOYER ADDRESS 2 — .o- xi a E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: 3h c,iof a p iOmC., 50 n -brie-1 -Pits. s'crnrj t, S dl cal List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: ``� /GYLC . ". uS-\-- O rid, 0\d�0,,, - QY \ ,e.c .0-. o�`c -i'o n 513/i Li ) t\ c e ce se t cin -b-2. is - S 4-C- O la TO . List any organizations to which you beton (professional technical, community service): cor (in m n i.i SQ.rua ce-) i2c (2,,,,,,, a i_i c 1 Q.j project-TO Lxia..k i. Lcyy,.."4€d 63a.y,. SL., so K Q.0)� ,t`.La,.vse eran L -(- . 1�sZA.c)`-) \o n c-nEk-a, -Ne cols,. CGu1mi tzLp. '. State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualitied for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)�,,Q i 0-e, ,., o/ r> x ard ,JY'r his ) -tu che)C) A'.-cC.•-S L--c.) -- 01d.—COw1- and Ver Much - a�-'"- r'r,.0 <-Q- S�c� -1,�a4--- `rt¢. lam ,C r-ri -}3-r j Id-rcx..0 n GI. 5 wyb� rn G v Q, '‘V crA\ a- c' --.a ha.1.1 `a�+t'v� I understandth: any or all information on this form may be verified.I consent t- he release of_t this Infpfmation •r public infor 1 : '• purposes. � kA-cdv\ako-ss Si ature: ,i6'/./.� #11 / ., Date: ! d,,e Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 • PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE 06-10-14P02 : 44 RCVD "' City of Temecula __ � CEOVE� i Temecula,100 Main Street Old Town Local Review o 4 I iv - by ry CA 92590 .'-.„ .yKy www.cityoftemecula.org Board Application ZU� ••" (951) 694-6444 LLttna vcr" For.proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident? 6.5 If yes, number of years I S Are you a Registered Voter? 1�CS NAME: JC HN 6 0 64 OCCUPATION: (ZE ' etrkfit 004-1 ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: %� EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: R� %�oct , rot_ 65.1-4-1ECs:140y 0 IA' citi EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 41183° 4 rye 5i Ttl►�66"/,at4E--MAIL , t Educational Background/Degrees: * BA a Ecoo ot..‘c s i w e- -i 1+n).t-11T6rL C'.0 u_t4E(Pfl 4- 1t. C- sr.4 DEYELJPM6\-r-4,• o 6I-20w7.04, cCv►ri ke pRoc9mrr•' v c sq-N t1iE j c List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: 71ft5 wool/ (j& 'vv.( 6H.4e- Cl-r/ 130 1b nomT70 J List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): S-0017wt-st /t-ivc�2!nQE GovN7y 6..„/11,16 13 CF 44,t ?bv4Sj f C 'A►"66,, , 7-6 4"e•C}tA CH4r ix,.., C F 6;0w-4y-et/Lek.�, 1I 1 f� Nt C,�E tkAy iI � OCl aOJ oP l ef�1-"1l '`�S'i 5.)) 1,21 bGc coo ye w\\)f,un,/ c r A--rI J State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. • Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) SEE. fitrt&i) I understan That any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this inform: sin f.r p blic Information purposes. Signature: ►'i A _ Date: ( la ly "lease mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE v wok . -d Letter of Interest for One of the Vacant Seats on the City of Temecula's Old Town Local Review Board June 10, 2014 Name: John Goga Ad dress: Citizen of US: Yes Registered Voter in Temecula: Yes Resident of the city: Yes 18 years of age or older: Yes Attendance: I live and work in Old Town Temecula and with my flexible schedule as a real estate broker t expect to be able to attend all Old Town Review Board meetings Occupation: Owner of RedRock, A Real Estate Company Tn City Council Members and/or Members of the Old Towo Local Review Board It is an honor to be able to submit my application for selection to fill one of the vacant seats on the city of Temecula's Old Town Local Review Board. I have been a resident of Temecula since 1998. During that time, I have seen the build out of the city and the incredible and exciting growth of our community. I believe in the "old town" atmosphere of Old Town Temecula and in maintaining standards and managed growth of the area now that it's been established as one of the exciting destinations in Temecula. As a resident for the past 15 years,and now a business owner in old town, 1 have found that I have a passion for serving and preserving this precious area of Temecula. I bring a unique perspective and passion to the Old Town Local Review Board with my life experiences residing in the Vintage Hills community, in Temeku Hills, in our wine country for 3 years and now right here in old town. I've raised my 3 children here, coached their baseball and soccer teams and watched them all graduate from Great Oak High School. I've been in the real estate industry since 1993 and have lived and worked in both San Diego and Orange Counties for a number of years and have experienced the successful growth in the communities (Poway and Mission Viejo) I lived in. I have a bachelor's degree in Economics with a minor in statistics, have successfully completed the Real Estate Development and Growth certificate program at UC San Diego and I have built my own home in Temecula's wine country. (,.. r I am excited for the opportunity to participate in the continued growth of Old Town Temecula and 1 look forward to supporting projects that maintain and improve the quality of the experience here, while protecting the image and special features Old Town has become known for. ncerely, A: nGog )ker Red Rock A Real Estate Company John Go a EXECUTIVE LEVEL MANAGER: SALES •OPERATIONS • BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT I am a creative, results-oriented business developer and expert in cultivating loyal, long term B2B and 82C client relationships. I have been a key contributor to corporate bottom lines by building and managing cross functionel sales teams and speerheading multimillion dollar revenue generation. I offer 25+ years of distinguished experience in executive leadership of medium to large sales operations. I possess a high level of passion related to the continued pursuit of new business opportunities. New Business Development•Account Expansion •Operations Management•Strategic Planning Lead Generation•Market Penetration• Executive Leadership •Budgeting• Prospecting Database Management• Sates Conferences•Trade Shows•Marketing•Negotiations Process Reengineering •Resource Optimization•Sales Forecasting • Product Launch •Sales Support Needs Assessment•High-Impact Presantationa•Relationship Development•Online Resources PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2013-Present RedRock, A Real Estate Company Temecula, CA Broker f Owner-Residential, Commercial and Property Management 2009 - 2012 Real Estate First, Inc. Temecula, CA Senior Vice President-Manage overall operation of reel estate office. 2008-2009 ReelEstate.com Temecula, CA Realtor-Facilitated real estate buy and sell transactions for clients. 2008 -2009 Ameripath Mortgege Irvine, CA Sales Director- Hired, trained and managed Loan Officer call center sales team to develop conventional and FHA business. Responsible for maintaining lead capture and sales goals. 1998 - 2008 Lehman Brothers, Inc. Irvine, CA Branch Manager and Account Executive,BNC Mortgage end Aurora Loan Services-Producing Manager of wholesale origination branch that was consistently a top producing branch for the company. Managed 12 Account Executives. Established and maintained strong relationships with broker community. Regional Vice President of Sales, BNC Mortgage-Managed 7 Western U.S.wholesale mortgage origination branches comprised of over 75 sales and operations employees. Traveled extensively. Director of Correspondent Lending, BNC Mortgage - Built and managed BNC Mortgage's Correspondent Lending Division doing business nationwide. Traveled extensively. 1996-1996 AMRESCO Residential Mortgage Corp-VP of Portfolio Acquieltione Ontario,CA 1995-1996 Prime Financial Corporation-VP of Marketing Costa Mesa,CA 1992-1995 Bank of America-Manager of Portfolio Acquisitiona Poway,CA 1992--1996 Century 21 Realty-Reettor Poway,CA 1989-1992 Wells Fergo Bank-Secondary Mariceting Supervisor San Diego,CA 1986-1989 Trustbank FSB-Secondary MarkatIng Supervieor McLean,VA 1986-1986 First Jersey Securities-Registered Representative McLean, VA ASSOCIATIONS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS California Association of Mortgage Brokers • Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce • Member, REO Agents.net•California BRE Salesperson's License•Cal Association of Realtors•Benk of America Management Training Certificate of Completion • Wells Fargo Credit Analysis Training Certificate of Completion • Prior SEC Series 7 and Series 63 licenses • Real Estate Investor • Designed end managed construction of personal residence • Published articles• Who's Who of Mortgage Pros • UC San Diego - Real Estate Development and Growth Certificate Program • Westminster College - Pennsylvenia - Graduated May 1984 - BA in Economics ` i1 1{IIF City of Temecula im ,is n • 41000 Main Street O/d Town Local Review am, Temecula, CA 92590aY 1989 www.cityoftemecula.org Board Application 272014 (951) 694-6444 "TY commis Dent. For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident? Yes If yes, number of years 25 Are you a Registered Voter? Yes NAME: William M. Joyce OCCUPATION: insurance Agency Owner ADDRESS; DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: Allstate Insurance EMPLOYER ADDRESS; 28465 Old Town Front Ss.t�215, Temecula,CA E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: Glendale College/Mt. San Antonio College - Business Administration List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: No previous experience List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors State why you wish to serve on this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) My wife and I have lived and owned a business in Temecula for over 25 years. We have raised four children here. My insurance agency is in Old Town Temecula and and want to see responsible and positive economic growth for this special area of our community. I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for blic information ,urposes. AN EhZ Signature: fllPa1!� /�- Date: f7//¢ Please mail or turn 'o: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 4100,1 Ma Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE William M. Joyce - Resume Experience 2011—Present Will Joyce Allstate Insurance Agency Old Town Temecula, CA Agency Owner • Property, casualty, life, investments, business, health insurance 2010—Present Golden II Enterprises, Inc. Temecula, CA President/CEO • Consultant for minor league baseball teams 2009-2010 St. George RoadRunners Professional Baseball Club St. George, UT President/CEO • Purchased team through Golden Baseball League from failed ownership group • Unable to turn franchise around due to economic and market conditions • Returned franchise to league in August 2010 2008-2010 San Diego Padres Baseball Club San Diego, CA Associate Scout • Scout and evaluate high school and college baseball players for Major League Baseball first year player draft 1988-2010 Central Security Services Inc. San Diego/Temecula, CA President/CEO • Grew customer base from 225 customers to over 3,000 • Grew revenues by-11001'k. • Grew business from 3 to 46 employees • Expanded markets to include the entire State of California. • Improved profit margins. Implemented employee training and benefits programs • Developed key account program for high profile accounts • Sold business to pursue minor league baseball team in January 2010 William M.Joyce Resume Page II 1984-1988 Post Alarm Systems Pasadena CA Executive Vice President/CEO • Grew customer base from 375 customers to over 4,000 • Grew revenues by 1600% • Designed and staffed automated U.L. central station monitoring facility • Improved profit margins and implemented employee training and benefits programs • Sold interest in 1988 to pursue ownership of Central Alarm Systems 1973-1984 West Coast Alarm Systems Los Angeles, CA Central Station Operator Service Technician Operations Manager General Manager • Converted existing U.L. central station from manual operation to automated state of the art facility. • Expanded sales and operations divisions. • Improved profitability to position the company for sale. Education 1972-1974 Glendale College Glendale, CA • Police Science and Business Administration. 1974-1976 Mount San Antonio College Walnut, CA • Business Administration and Accounting. Trade Industry 1982-1988 Los Angeles Burglar and Accomplishments Fire Alarm Association Los Angeles, CA President • Founding president. • Established strong relationships with legislators and police and fire officials in cities countywide • Worked with local legislators to draft and adopt standards for false alarm ordinances • Received commendations from Los Angeles City Council and Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for contributions to community • Created liaison with State of California, Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Collection and Investigative Services • Served on Governors advisory board • Served as Southern VP for California Alarm Association Interests Family, travel, technology, golf, baseball, water skiing, snow skiing. 0 6-1 1-14 A 10: 18 R C V D RECEIVED JUN 11. 2014 ,,f City of Temecula ft pr 41000 Main Street old Town Local Re✓1tw 1.`t:. KKtf ole r. Temecula, CA 92590 Board Application t9a9 www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 --- For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident? Yes If yes, number of years 6 Are you a Registered Voter?Yes NAME: DONALD LUNDAY OCCUPATION: RETIRED ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:— EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: RETIRED EMPLOYER ADDRESS: E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: Master of Arts in Consciousness Studies,Holmes Institute,Denver,CO: Graduate Studies-San.Frencisco Theological Seminary&University of CA Berkeley-1955-57; Bachelor of Arts in English,Lewis&Clark College,Portland,OR-1955 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: While I have not be-en directly involved in city or county committees or commissions. I served four years as a member of the Board of Directors of the"Cityhood Committee'for Menifee,CA(2005-2008) List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): Since I retired in December 2007,I have remained active as a hospice chaplain. Prior to my retirement and as part of my career.I served my community in many ways: Sales&Marketing Executives of Los Angeles(40 years,President 1975-76); Pasedena Tournament of Roses Association(40 years): international Festivals&Events Assoc.(18 years)(Executive Director 4 years); Catifomia Festivals&Events Assoc. (Founding Member)(20 years)(Executive Director 2 years); Optimist International,Pasadena,CA&Greeley.CO(15 years): intemetional Chili Society(10 years); Rotary Inlemetional(9 years) (Menifee,CA -President 2009)(Murrieta,CA). State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) It has always been important to me to be"involved"in my community. it will atweys be important to me that I actively contribute.My career has always been as a leeder end one who can relate to others. Since moving to Temecula,I an'a frequent attendee and active financiel supporter of"The Merc"and the"Old Town Temecula Community Theater.` I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Information fot.public information purposes. Signature: "(1 lA!6,8-1;Ita(f9e, Date: — (e--/y Please mail or return to:City o,/Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main.Street emecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE 06-11-1410 1:45 RCVD 0 '11, Cityof Temecula 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review . Temecula, CA 92590 ►� 'CEIVED ,989 www.cityoftemecula.org Board Application (s51 694-6444 EN 112014 •For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter "`�Y DEPT. Temecula Resident? If yes, number of years 1y Are you a Registered Voter? L NAME:ftE.PE fri IIt�� OCCUPATION: tISt;►3LLi) UCr ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: tJ I A I EMPLOYER ADDRESS: i ) IA. E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: 11,,S, f 3 aS!NESS ikO r► i 13SA 6SRC?RIZ CO k E•j e A.( . D KLr) cPt- S'- lSflo aEkivitOl?ua Z . A. pug1--tc-.PO) rel,NisTTid0) CRC STATE/ SAWN Beetle A-IAC) List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you haverved and the year(s)of service:-3I t SS ra^I i4 z-f 3 1 ^RKS Mb REc___Re i 60 Co M (0ill 0cuA)(TY SEE-0rCeS COrh/►a1SSiCAJ 19g3- WC' ?pC$ c Ir.r►i tc.c_Lit tom- i c Cen fly D j c-i k.r 2Gr'o "P List any organizations to which you belong. (professional, technical, community service): GAL,CoeN,-A A S sac r t4TiDN or lAc€L.L CE•yietcTeres (C /0 c-) CALL-'o en) (A S PCc,q(-... Qi%Te fc.TS AS So C. i laTt o„ (c.,5 DA) • State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) T W t S+vra SEet) Ob THrs C�rH rv\ISS tow ge6AcLS6-- FeLiez RNA Arl DEAicrtTsbrome05ieNol'Tmiscrry. 1"E1t ply 3Eae5 of RcS1DENiCy Avila S�eJ ice gists T kC ono& r .4.q Foe nil co M Al U_A)(ill Qt_t,fkLI c y S ry c- QoR1-14.6 APPoirvnykeA'1 I understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public informatio purposes. Signature: A Date: 6,—/O' 2_6/4-71 P/e se mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE x City of Temecula �,' 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review A - • Temecula, CA 92590 Board Application X9!{9 www.cityoftemecula.org (951)694-6444 RE E/VES JUN 0 4 2014 . For proper consideration;'you must.currently be a Registered.Voter. Temecula Resident?Vgjlf yes, number of years f Are you a Registered Voter? `/ 1 5 NAME: PG C•r moo2 C OCCUPATION: ? ?6" 'QED ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: S4 EMPLOYER NAME: rViecl EMPLOYER ADDRESS: i)(/-I E-MAIL Educational Background/Degrees: List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessery.) I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for public information purposes. Signature: P..A C ll' C -iS&L- Date: ( /3 f/ y Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Educational Background/Degrees: Master of Administrative Science,The Johns Hopkins University 1977 Bachelor of Science,Accounting, University of Baltimore 1973 Home Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1953—1955, 1961—1962 Cal State University San Marcos Osher Life Long Learning Institute,Classroom Ambassador, Regional Ambassador,Curriculum Committee 2008—Current Evergreen Society,The Johns Hopkins University,Continuing education for retirees, 1993—2001, Social Chair 1994—2000 City or County Boards,Committees or Commissions served: Temecula Old Town Local Review Board 2002—Current,Vice-Chair 2006, Chair 2007—2010,2014 Temecula Old Town Specific Plan Committee 2010-2011 Temecula City Civic Center Architectural Committee 2004 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Can-Do Club Board Secretary 2004—2006 Temecula Valley Museum Docent 2003—2009 Children's Temecula Valley History Contest judge 2007—2008,2011—Current Temecula Citizens Corps Co-Program Administrator 2002—2004 Temecula City Councilmember 1989—1992 Temecula Redevelopment Agency 1989—1992,Chair 1991 Temecula Community Services District 1989—1992,Vice President 1991 Temecula City Committees 1989—1992: Airport Finance Design Standards Integrated Waste Management,Chair Public Works/Facilities Old Town Planning,Chair The City Committee for Incorporation Secretary 1988—1989 Organizations Served: Temecula Valley Kiwanis Club and Foundation 2003—Current, Board Member 2004—2008,Treasurer 2010 Current, House Committee chair 2007—Current, Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County Sports Park Snack Bar Chair 2012—Current, Citizen of the Year Co-Winner 2010—2011, Kiwanian of the Year 2012—2013 Golden Valley Music Society Advisory Board 2010—Current Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Life Long Achievement Award Co-Winner 2010 Golden Valley Music Society Co-Patron of the Year 2010 Alternatives to Domestic Violence Board 2002—2008,Treasurer 2004—2007 Southwest Riverside County Lincoln Club Board Secretary 2006—2008 A Volunteer Center of Riverside County's Volunteer of the Year 2005 Temecula ADV Outreach Advisory Board 2003—2008 Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Member 1986—1992, 2001—Current,Governmental Action Committee 2001—2005, Legislative Summit Committee 2003—2004,Governmental Affairs Committee 1987—1989,Chair 1988—1989,Ambassador 1988—1989, Member of the Year Nominee 1988&2006, Business of the Year Nominee 1987,Balloon and Wine Fest Committee 1987—1992,Admissions Chair 1989 Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Member 2005—Current,Marketing Committee Member 2005—2006 Musicians Workshop Board Advisor 2004—2007 Temecula Valley Historical Society Member 2001—Current; Liaison from Old Town Local Review Board 2009—Current Temecula Valley Arts Council Member 2002—2005,Assistant Treasurer 2004—2005 Temecula Friends of the Library Life Member 2001—Current Temecula Valley Wine Society Member 1987—1992,2001-Current,Scholarship Committee 1988—1992 Rancho Temecula Exchange Club Member 1987—1992,Treasurer 1989—1992 Temecula Town Association Member 1986—1992 Temecula Playhouse Board 1988—1992 Sam Hicks Monument Park Board 1987—1989 The reasons I believe I am qualified,and desire,to serve on the Old Town Local Reserve Board are: I believe that Temecula's Old Town,and the historic buildings located outside the district,are great economic benefits to the City,and wish to see that they continue to attract quality development, maintain their integrity,and remain a major tourist attraction within the city.I firmly believe in preserving Temecula's history and sharing it with our citizens and tourists alike. I appreciate guiding the development of new additions to the mix of historic buildings for an attractive and active area within the City.And the Also, I believe that I have a unique position in understanding the desires of City Government,and the philosophy of Temecula and its heritage. I love the City of Temecula and would like to continue to be part of the force that makes this city the best place in the world to live,work and play. RECEIVED MAY 302014 City of Temecula gzfiI' ,\ Q;,:ITY.�I�g$KS f�1FdP4. �t_� y, �, 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review �� � Temecula, CA 92590 ,�9 www.cifyaitemecufa.org Board Application (951) 694-6444 For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter 1 Temecula Resident? If yes, number of years)1,_ Are you a Registered Voter? es NAME: )lit01 R. CAC.'a/ OCCUPATION: 1- OMO,MakOir ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHO __ EVENING PHONE: Mei EMPLOYER NAME: N/Pr EMPLOYER ADDRESS: N/A E- educational Background/Degrees: List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service)" State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Information f r public I. ation p poses. 9 Sl natures cka-C---e-ot) Date: S/z /11-1 Please mail r return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE THECITY (.1; -j* I -I----1 .F: ECULA GWENDOLMT RACCA OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION MAY 30TH 2014 41000 MAIN STREET • TEMECULA • CALIFORNIA • 92590 •• ••: GWThQAY.••• • KI RACC.t D . •. .. Old Town local Review Board May 30th 2014 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Dear Board Members, Please consider me as a candidate for your current Old Town Local Review Board position. I was excited to hear of this opening via The City of Temecula's website and social media outlets. I know that my background and talents of Building Community are perfect for this role. After reviewing the responsibilities and significance of this Review Board, I would consider it a privilege to work with this team. I am a new resident to Temecula,but don't allow that to go against me, I had the choice to live anywhere in Southern California,but the moment I saw Old Town, I knew this was home. I want to be a part of this thriving community. I have been following the City Hall meetings and local events,while still in my City prior, Fresno. CA. I knew I wanted to live as close to Old Town as possible, I achieved that and have attended every Building Community event this City has hosted. I take great pride in my Service and Experience. Every organization and committee that I have served in has been because I believe in what I'm doing. I have used every skill I have to deliver an effective, focused and on- target product. I am a creative,reliable,and passionate young woman who consistently works well in a collaborative team or as an individual. Please know that if I am selected to serve on this Review Board I will bring every skill I have to the table and ensure that all matters pertaining to the historic significance, unique architectural infrastructure,and cultural heritage preservation will be of my utmost importance. I look forward to meeting with the team to further discuss what I can bring to this Review Board. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincer%y, • k /JC) civ Gwendolyn Rocca tGWoO ? RACCA :GR : I want to serve in the Old Town Local Review Board because I believe in building community. I have a passion to see where I choose to live thrive and • stand out from surrounding cities. I feel my experience and service qualities me for this position because I know what it takes to bring ideas to fruition. I am able to review different points of view or ideas and investigate oil solutions. L`),I4tti :1+tx"UP"' City Board Committee City of Fresno. 2011-2014 Fresno, CA Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee • Advised and recommended policies for the planning, development. and maintenance of pedestrian and bikeway systems for a safe and enjoyable circulation for both utilitarian commuting travel and Forensics/Research recreation with the City. Center for Advance • Review of the General Plan, existing conditions, road and Research and Technology construction projects. project developing. enforcement,educational Fresno.California efforts,and committee composition. 2000-2002 Sunnyside Leadership HS Orgoniiafons Fresno,California 1999- 2002 Fresno Rides Nights Coalition, 2012- 2014 Fresno/C avis, CA Founder, Choir ISkit1 • - networked with!pact businesses to highlight their services and link a bicycle friendly mindset to their districts. Graphic& Web Design Social Media Marketing Future Fresno Project, 2013- 2014 Fresno, CA Mac& PC Systems Advocate Microsoft Office 2013 Fluent in Spanish • Planned projects to inform and promote ideas that contribute to a Project Management better future for Fresno and the Central Valley. Network Management Team Leadership The Downtown Fresno Partnership. 2012- 2014 Fresno. CA Public Speaking Advocate • Assisted in leading Fresno's Downtown toward a future of vibrancy by promoting; business activity, Downtown's image, supporting physical Long Distance Cycling improvements and development. Community Event Planning Hiking Care for Creation, 2010-20 l4 Fresno. CA Kayaking Founder, Director Photography • Netwotked with department and grocery stores to collect goods and distribute to local charities, shelter and community pantries. Craig Scharton Service Cyclofemme, "We Ride Together" Campaign, 2012- Present Temecula, CA City of Fresno, Honorary "Gwen Rocca Day" March 31s' Fresno, CA Vanessa McCracken ibikefresno.org, City of Fresno Bicycle Campaign. 2011-2014 Fresno. CA Women on Wheels, Intro to Cycling for Women, 2012- 2014 Fresno, CA. Elizabeth Perez _ Tour de Fresno, Director's Assistant. S.M. Manager 2011 2013 Fresno, CA Race Across America,Team Donate Life,Crystel's Gift, 2011- 2012 Fresno.CA RECEIVED • City of Temecula 6). ,' 41000 Main Street ' ' -27 2014 Old Town Local Review Temecula, CA 92590 Board App/icatiar11rT CLERKS DEPT. 1989 www.cityoftemecula.org (951) 694-6444 I ' For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident?Yrs If yes, number of years // Are you a Registered Voter? r„,s NAME: cROvt L1 Z 1 OCCUPATION: ekires e4 i'n,, /,5--- a�TGT/ ADDRESS: lDi'''. vl'-isk /r4 1a-5crne.lci DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: '.ChG(I^ ,A ZSerf f PG{.S•/e6i EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 1-3000 gckn<c), /' qMIIMIIIIIM Tire 4Pc/ ,r,o Z yaJ Educational Background/Degrees: gee Gud1iGc4c.4 List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: Vie. 9-41 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separateLQsheet f paper if necessary.) l/Zrl(•G '- ( I understand that any or a I inf.•• ation on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for pu. c i • matio. .urposes. Signature: �r� �'� Date: C-: Z?--// ' ease m.. or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Rand zzo Application for the Old Town Local Review Board occupation: I am the Claims Administrator for the Pcchanga Band of Luiseno Indians and the Director of Risk Management and the Custodian of Records for the Pechanga Resort& Casino. I have been so employed for 12 years. I have worked as a none-attorney manager of three Law Firms, and am well versed in civil law. I have been declared a qualified expert witness in State and Federal Courts. Educational Background/Degrees: Temple University—B.A. - Communications Miami-Dade University—A.A.—Criminal Justice Miami-Dade University- Certification for Licensure as a Private investigator and Surety Agent FEMA -Certification in Emergency Management FEMA—Certification in the National Incident Management System Rockhurst University-OSHA Certification New Mexico Tech. —Certification in Incident Response to Terrorist Bombings New Mexico Tech.—Certification Courses in Prevention and Response to Suicide Bombing Texas A&M University—various courses and workshops on WMD/Terrorism Incidences NOTE: I have taken many, many courses and seminars in the fields of insurance, auditing, security, risk management,employment law, workers compensation, etc. List any City or County Board,Committee or Commission on which you have served and the vear(s}of service. I currently sit as the appointed none-tribal member Commissioner on the Pechanga Tribal Emergency Response Commission (TERC). Pursuant to a Tribal Resolution I have served on the Commission since 2002 and served as Chairman in 2008&2009. I am also the Pechanga Tribe's representative on the Federal Region 9 Emergency Response Team. Former Guardian Ad Litem in the 17t Judicial Circuit of Broward County, FL. I served for 5 years, having spent I V2 years in the Dependence Court and the remaining 3 V2 years in the Circuit Criminal Court. List any organizations to which you belong(professional,technical,community service): International Association of Private Investigators State why you wish to serve on this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) I have been a resident of Temecula for 11 years. I have recently moved into Old Town and reside in one of the"Market Value" residential units in the Front Street Plaza Building. I am and have been a proponent of the responsible revitalization of Old Town. I am certain that my full-time presence in Old Town provides me with a unique opportunity to evaluate and prioritize what may be in the best interest of Old Town and the impact of those interests both on Old Town and on the greater Temecula community. In my occupation 1 interact with persons of all walks of life. I am an effective team builder and a very strong negotiator. As referenced above, I have an extensive background in civil law/litigation as well as a dozen years in the Public sector, City of Temecula 'b /js41000 Main Street old Town Local Review �'ECEfVEo Temecula, 92590Board Application f lyY 2 w ww .cityoftemecula.orga)1i (951) 694-6444 --- 4.1I CV CLettaur O,Ep; For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident?\i6 If yes, number of years (P Are you a Registered Voter? yCS NAME:1.--et 6 - -r OCCUPATION: Bus IV1e$S V r V,yl&C. AD DRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: VENING PHONE: 54 '--- EMPLOYER NAME: MAKS i e (d La.up 6-co vto EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 27 2q-7 r l Soy. Ave / E-MAIL 1— c Qc_ ( CJ ` 2 :, a Educational Background/Deegrees: t, 0 gOSG •S-f- �, e4 1i•-e...5'e r 011)Gt-1't0`mCt.. — S" dt CGS ' 0. 1 tf SS 4cc„-� t Real e5,, . 4e ''aiser l.r'ce.l $ -c. Lisany City or..County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have.served and the,year(s) of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service). Yto ne C-4" -H.r S -H- State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) I understand that any or all information on this form may ba verified. I consent to the release of this information for ublic informatio urposes. •L Signature: Date: �/�"7 / 7 Please mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Leah Spear Old Town Local Review Board Application I have lived in or around"Temecula for the last 10 years and plan on staying here for quite a while in the future. I worked in Marketing for a local restaurant and got to know quite a few business owners in town. I am a frequent visitor to Old Town Temecula and love to take visitors there. I have been on PTA boards and school site councils in tlic past and enjoy having a hand in the planning of organizations. I have worked in accounting and legal fields as well as marketing and general office management. I am a mother of flour children,ranging in age from 12 -34. I have a lot of experience in mediating situations and looking at all views and determining the best option for the majority. I would love to be involved in the future of Old Town Temecula. O5-27-14P01 : 06 RCVO City of Temecula S� 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review ~., t�; Temecula, CA 92590 �vxv y/ www.cityoftemecuia.org Board Application (951) 694-6444 ---__---- CEIVED L — e _ _ ' MAY2`� 2014 For proper consideration,you mast currently be a Registered Voter %:.ir1r CLERKS DEP' Temecula Resident?Ki If yes, number of years Are you a Registered Voter? rCf NAME: Fie' c" 14701/4OCCUPATION: CCF cc-in /a1,4 ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE: EVENING PHONE: EMPLOYER NAME: .--5/10e GM 1 U77,tx EMPLOYER ADDRESS: J/6 J gel} 1 bijt�44irST EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) I understand • any or ail inform. on o this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this infor or pu lic infor. aye .rposes. 1 Signature:� f� Date: 6 - Please ' a i return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Educational Background/Degrees: Restaurant and Hospitality management— Bari-Italy List any City or County Board,Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of Service: Irvine Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors(VP of membership)—15 yrs List any organizations to which you belong(professional,technical,community service): Temecula Chamber of Commerce State why you wish to serve on this commission,and why you believe you are qualified for the position.Please be specific.You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) • I'm a business owner in Old Town Temecula and I want to be involved to preserve and maintain the interests and integrity that has been built by the previous Board Members,and yet advance with the modern times. • I believe that Old Town Temecula Is poised to be the premier Southern California Destination. Thoughtful planning and stewardship of our valuable resources is essential. • My family and I are rooted in Temecula and plan to remain here for year to come. My management background,and service on community/civic boards and committees all enable me to bring a new approach and views. • With my forty plus years in the restaurant and hospitality industry will prove to be an asset in supporting future development. 05-27-I 4F12:09 RCVD � ,'�`�f"'', City of Temecula `r o.- ", 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review I Temecula, CA 92590 Board Application'.,,w ,9R9 www.cityoftemecula.org pp ift;: EIVEC (951) 694-6444 MAY 27 2014 Foc proper consideration;you must currently be a Registered,Vote_r �I k C� 6 DEP • Temecula Resident?Ye5 If yes, number of years2O+ Are you a Registered Voter?YES //�� �1 CAUFOP.vlA 5TATe PAieKs b NAME: ARy WATTS OCCUPATION:Dt3Trtt ci �ENoE/1- ADDRESS: �� t w rrk CITY ac 76 rn,Ecu (Rr`T�r��jPtRiA T DAYTIME PHONE EVENING PHONEME= EMPLOYER NAME: �rtk€ —31 YEARS CALIFORNIA Sr/iTE /*Res EMPLOYER ADDRESS:STATE 6"CALJFd)QA/),9 E-MAI Educational Background/Degrees: 8.s.--IVr47URAL REsouRcE AIANASE/)1,Elr`) N1IfiebT i STATE urnVEteSrr Execur►ve. MGT, pRo6RArn e 6RAN,TTE ' chooL or= rnAlm6tErne or I MC RI DORSI DE List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on hich you have served and the year(s) of service: ow Tao) LOCAL REVIEW &ARP (2.468-20 1-1 CuP EJrrLy VICE CIAIRPERSPILI ELs/No,ec-PitigA1ErA-AN2A RESautcE C EEktAnii.) Di 1QtGT 80ARD Cr pIRECioRS (2063-2D0?) AtvERsfOE Cou r M5-KP RESMJ€ MGT. aveRsir NT (Arno+/-rTz (2ro5-2ao8 SAA TA RasA$SAN 7Acr JJ Q r►kx.rnrrA,us NAT+DN/u- moN4A1 /kDV(it QY ct rn 1 EE{2cn 1-2008) W11_01-IFC Cof iPoR GONSS4QVArtQ Aiersif,TY 80,04cDtRtcrons (1987-2008 List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service): VILLAGE 5 Commuu ITy kort)EoWA)Eies ASW. &A'€o OF 0D/&c7meS (2.002-2,00 TErriEcuL, rILea rfsS7it 4L VOLuOTEER (2.0o6-2u78)2010, ley) PAL-0/1'1P72 Chi1EAE ACZY4401Cr 44GUL7y 199$ -204) State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position. Please be specific. You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) SEE .ATr EL I understand that or all infarm.t'on on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information or ubl.c f•r /'= on purposes. Signature: of.- Date: ' ZQl PI�se mail or return to: City of Temecula, City Clerk's O ce t 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE Old Town Local Review Board Application Gary Watts, Temecula, California I was appointed to the Old Town Local Review Board on June 24, 2008. During my six yeers on the Boerd I have learned a great deel about not only Old Town itself but how it exists within the greeter context of the City of Temecula. The Boerd and I have hed e chance to review several new end exciting projects end provide our input es they made their way through the city's approve{ process. We as a Board feel the city is headed in a great direction end the continued evolvement of Old Town is key to its future success as e vibrant and exciting destinetion end community to visit end live in. I currently am the Board Vice Chairperson for this year and I feel that I have very good rapport with both my fellow board members and the city planning staff the Board interects with. I also feel that we heve a good understanding of tha Old Town residents and business community end the overall vision the city hes developed for Old Town. I retired from California State Paries in December of 2008 as the regional menager for the Riverside/ San Bernerdino area. In that capacity I worked with community groups, non profits, elected officials, and government representatives et the local, etete, and federel level. I wes very involved in development issues that impacted our local stete parks and also helped develop three separate general plans for both state end federal protected areas. Thet experience included a significant interaction and understanding of both CEQA and NEPA requirements end consideretions. Additionally I have volunteered for the annual Temecule film festive{, served es e board member of my neighborhood homeowners aesociation, was eppointed to the local Resource Conservation District, taught classes while on the edjunct faculty of Palomar College, and am employed on a pert time basis es e retired ennuitent with Celifomia Stets Parks. I believe thet I am qualified for reappointment to the Old Town Local Review Board through my experience gained in my two terms on the Board, through my position with Californie State Parks and my involvement with our community here in Temecula. I hope to continue to contribute ideas, energy end vision to the Boerd. Thank you very much for your consideration. 1 . Cityof Temecula --`A�� ,, 41000 Main Street Old Town Local Review ����� Temecula, CA 92590 � '� JJN1Q2014 X910 WWW.cityoftemecuia.org Board Application (951)694-6444 CAW r_triaKif DEPT. For proper consideration,you must currently be a Registered Voter Temecula Resident?/ If yes, number of years 2-3 Are you a Registered Voter? y NAME: I L�J OCCUPATION: fC5//>h�5 CD(-^)/114- ADDRESS: DAYTIME PHONE:=MEW EVENING PHONE: i2s— EMPLOYER NAME: r /4-?c M -CLUG-47Z 7-1?e--04,T Pe- 71A/Nll <T,iNl EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 2 3 `I 0t • •4-•`7: EMAIL Educational Background/Degrees: tics h -r -1 I e_" % Zt, ✓t'r AQinr�)/5 " ,r�•) � kt7Ad-Ad-M4 % -7 UP)(V 5/ 7 List any Cit,,nr County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s)of service: List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical,community service): 36 c.i) nvlrrm 0/--p 7'vcJ&) P zf3 t•A A oG1 /MAI 0044-0 X197160 Mt. lir-1 (2 'n -it�?i 011 4-5 s t9u /1--71ap)i M '7 . �Wl)14 Coo vt�,,r�t 41 vi57N O.v2 iAJ stt-,nape tc�, w/.�sc,� s svx( ,(/) m 3 S> .0f ,o CU 6) /1100602 Sc iTlzgl/L1.aA C0 ,N-ry 6v6; I 'l6c S ,,v ph State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for thepos�tion` 5 Please be specific.You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.) kIT k c&O •P' I understan• t,i t a, .• . I inf•rmation on this form may be verified.I consent to the release of this inform•ti�� : pA f•rmation purposes Signature /1IIL4(IL Date: y./,/ Please mail or return to:City of Temecula, City Clerk's Office 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE v Oavid B Wilson I have been a business owner in Temecula since 1993,with an office located in Old Town Temecula since 1997. Board member with all previous renditions of the Old Town Temecula Association (Old Town Merchants Association, Old Town Mainstreet Association,etc. since 1997). My area of expertise is proactive tourism marketing and the coordination of tours and events,with a special awareness of the psychology of tourists and their desires/expectations. I have always harbored concerns about the development and direction of the Old Town Temecula district. My"historical" mentors over the years have included Tony Tobin and Bill Harker. I have concerns about the look of Old Town Temecula now with all the non-compliant banners,A-frame signs, non-conforming signage, "advertising paraphernalia"in public areas,and approvals when they waver from the spirit,intent and direction of the Old Town Specific plan. If it is desired to have a yes man or rubberstamper in the position,one who follows along and does not question/interject/reconsider than I am not the right fit. I am a free thinker who will follow the guidelines set forth in the Old Town Specific Plan, but will not be shy about pointing out inconsistencies and positive alternatives in appropriate situations. I am not beholden to any special interests or organizations in Temecula.I will be guided in decision-making by my conscience and what is right,utilizing the Old Town Specific Plan as a blueprint and resource. I only want the best and most advantageous course of action for our area,with special awareness and consideration of how decisions will Impact the ever- increasing numbers of visitors and their perceptions about this area. I work with planners and guests from all over the World, and have an impeccable reputation with top tier hotels and resorts throughout Southern California and the service professionals they employ. If a unique perspective about the current perceptions and future direction of Old Town Temecula is appropriate and desirable,I will be an excellent addition to the board. Approvals City Attorney Finance Director City Manager CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Thomas W. Garcia, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 26, 2014 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT PROJECT NAME BRIEF DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Interstate -15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South $50,778,033 • Anticipate final Design Plans to be complete Fall 2014 Fire Station 73 Living Quarters Upgrade, PW13-07 Improvements to living and sleeping quarters to accommodate staff $1,637,000 • Currently in Design • Anticipate completion Fall 2014 Library Parking - Phase II, PW13-09 Provide additional parking for library patrons, meetings, and special programs $1,796,000 • Currently in Design • Anticipate completion beginning of 2015 Pauba Road Sidewalks, PW13-08 Construction sidewalk along Pauba Road from just east of La Primavera to Ynez Road $488,400 • Approval of plans and specifications, and authorization to solicit bids scheduled for the August 26, 2014 City Council Meeting Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement, PW12-20 Design and construct a new innovative play area to replace the existing equipment $521,550 • Request for Proposals (RFP's) posted on PlanetBids on July 31, 2014 • RFP submittals due August 28, 2014 Special Needs Playground, PW12-02 Install play structure for youth and special needs kids at Margarita Park $1,362,150 • Currently under Construction • Anticipate completion Fall 2014 Citywide Concrete Repairs, PW14-07 Annual Citywide concrete repairs to various facilities maintained by the City $435,870 • Approval of plans and specifications, and authorization to solicit construction bids scheduled for the August 26, 2014 City Council Meeting Citywide Slurry Seal Fiscal Year 2014-15, PW14-05 Annual application of slurry seal to various City maintained streets $920,852 • Construction to begin week of August 25, 2014 • Anticipate completion Fall 2014 8/26/14 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT PROJECT NAME BRIEF DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED/CURRENT MILESTONES LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Halcon Rojo (PA12-0226) Major Modification to allow a reduction in the number of buildings to two structures, located north of Temecula Parkway and approximately 400 feet east of Jedediah Smith Road • Currently in construction EMWD (Utility Project) Old Town Sewer Project located at Old Town Front Street and Moreno to First Street • Anticipate construction to begin September 2014 EMWD (Utility Project) Bore pits at Diaz Road and Alvarado for new forced main • Anticipate pavement repair work to be complete by end of August 2014 • Trail restoration and private landscaping ongoing RCWD (Utility Project) Repeater Antennas for meter reading at ten locations throughout the City • Anticipate completion September 2014 EDISON (Utility Project) Replace three leaning power poles on the east side of Ynez Road, south of Ynez Court • Anticipate completion September 2014 8/26/14 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT PROJECT NAME BRIEF DESCRIPTION TOTAL PROJECT COST ESTIMATED / CURRENT MILESTONES MAINTENANCE PROJECTS Citywide Concrete Repairs (Street Maintenance) Remove and replace damage damaged and/or raised concrete at various locations throughout the City $479,500 • Estimated start date is September 2014 • Estimated completion date is January 2015 Ronald Reagan Sports Park / Temecula Park Parking Lot Repairs (Park Maintenance) Remove and replace damaged areas; grind and overlay; and, restripe $180,000 • Completed August 15, 2014 Citywide Slurry Project (Street Maintenance) Slurry seal, crack fill, and stripe various streets throughout the City $1,400,000 • Start date was August 18, 2014 • Estimated completion date is October 2014 City Facilities Rehabilitation - Community Recreation Center Swimming Pool Filtration/Chemical System Replacement (Facility Maintenance) Replace aging pool filtration system and water quality management system $150,000 • Estimated start date is December 2014 • Estimated completion date is February 2015 Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Pala Community Park Play Equipment and Safety Surfacing Replacement (Park Maintenance) Replace two play structures and associated safety surfacing $150,000 • Estimated start date is January 2015 • Estimated completion date is March 2015 8/26/14 REQUESTS TO SPEAK REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: ` 7 I wish to speak on: N1 Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) Subject: V A 6t-AiE! 1t5 -OP /MISE 21/1 Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: 4)64-Y/1)/ lJ :1 ca! k Address: . Phone Number: / ^ = If you are representi g an or anization or group, please give the name: ,b2f2-1- 7 v4 -refnz=c(414 VEr ere Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) Subject: nAgenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podiumpad state your n e for the record. Name: G1-11 1 G LDk Address: (-'j"P,,e / V I G-\ Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: ARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) QC3 01,01 Subject:o n K �Y�o� £ceo� -the S 5'�9 rxrAgenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: fl r� C.�� � Cr-) / Leh Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: 5L)s1V /6' /,7g JtiI C►Pl(le /111;1-ele# Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) )\\-\ V2t/A1 Agenda Item No. 1 \ For Fi Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the record. J Name: (/1 iJ ► Cc. Address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Phone Number: /' Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. //''' F,4-010 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: qc),-L/1,A\ I wish to speak on: Public Comment CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA /THA / TPFA (Circle One) Subject: , Agenda Item No. 1/ For Against equest to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form must be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the podium and state your name for the recor . Name: /('/) /'i Address: Phone Number: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional.