HomeMy WebLinkAbout052091 PC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANI~ING COI~ISSION
MONDAYv I~Y 20, 1991
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was
called to order Monday, May 20, 1991, 7:00 P.M., at Vail Elementary
School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting
was called to order by Chairman Dennis Chiniaeff.
PRESENT: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
ABSENT: 0
COMMISSIONERS: None
Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Planning
Director Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Engineer Doug Stewart and
Minute Clerk Gail Zigler.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
COMMISSION BUSINESS
1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to approve the agenda, with Item 10
taken prior to Item 3, seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
2. MINUTES
COMMISSIONER FORD moved to approve the minutes of May 6, 1991,
with the following modifications:
Page 11, ninth paragraph vote, move under the motion made by
Commissioner Hoagland.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND seconded the motion to approve the
minutes as modified.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PCMIN5/20/91 -1- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COI.~MISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1991
GARY THORNHILL requested that a motion be made to continue Item 14
to the meeting of June 3, 1991.
COMMISSINER FORD moved to continue Item No.
Planning Commission meeting of June 3,
COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
14 to the regular
1991, seconded by
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
None
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
10. PUBLIC USE PERMIT NO. 625 (REV.)
10.1
Request to allow Rancho Baptist Church three (3) On Site
Temporary Trailers. Located at 29775 Santiago Road,
Temecula.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
C~IRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 6:15
P.M.
JIM CARPENTER, Pastor, Rancho Baptist Church, 30933
Loma Linda Road, Temecula, provided a brief history
of the church.
JERRY TEDDER, 37797 Calle De Lobo, Murrieta, provided
background on the development of the church and the
phasing of construction.
DAVID CARPENTER, 41169 Vintage Circle, Temecula,
representing Rancho Baptist Church, requested that
Condition of Approval No. 14 be waived.
RICHARD SKAGGS, 29497 Rancho California Road, #675,
Temecula, requested clarification of where the proposed
improvements were going in at the church site and added
that he had no problem with the proposal.
BARBARA HUGHES, 44278 Cabo Street, Temecula, spoke
against the approval of the temporary trailers due to
insufficient screening between her property and the
church grounds.
BOB HINZ, 44264 Cabo Street, Temecula, spoke against
the appproval of the temporary trailers, also due to
PCMIN5/20/91 -2- MAY 24, 1991
PL~qNING COIQ(ISSION MINUTES I(AY 20, L99L
insufficient screening between the residential property
and the church.
HTEVE JIANNINO advised the Commission that when the
original Public Use Permit was approved, a Variance
was approved deleting the requirement for a screen
wall for the entire project.
COI414ISSIONER FORD suggested to the applicant that
temporary screening be placed and permanent screening
be in place prior to phase 2 construction, with Planning
staff working out the details with the applicant.
DAVID CHRISTIAN stated that they would be willing to
work that out with staff.
GARY THORNHILL added that the project could be
conditioned to have a permanent screen wall in place
prior to occupancy of the phase two structure.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised the Commission, as well as the
applicant, that if the applicant wishes to contest the
amount of the development fee (Condition No. 14), they
may do so, by appealing the imposition of the fee at
the City Council level.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing
at 6:50 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91-(next) approving
Public Use Permit No. 625 (rev.), subject to the
Conditions of Approval as submitted by staff, modifying
Condition No. 14 as presented by the Assistant City
Attorney and adding a condition requiring that the
temporary trailers be painted to match the existing
building, a maximum of 36 months approval on the use
of the temporary trailers, and temporary screening
of the chain link fence to include wooden slats and
landscaping, with the construction of a block wall
with construction of Phase Two, seconded by COMMISSIONER
BLAIR.
After Commission discussion, COMMISSIONER FAHEY amended
her motion to require the temporary screening of the
chain link fence be in place prior to occupancy of the
trailers and the permanent block wall be constructed
within 36 months of approval of the PUP, seconded by
COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
None
PCMIN5/20/91 -3- MAY 24, 1991
PL~NING CO~,~(~SS~ON N[NUTES ~Y 20, ~99~
VEST'rN(~ TENT&T?VE TI~CT I~P NO. 26861 ~TD V2BLR'r~%TCE NO. 7
Proposal to develop 145 detached condominium units on
approximately 14 acres and variance to allow for the
development of units below the required 1000 square
foot minimum ground floor living area per Ord. 348.
RIC~%RD AYALA provided the staff report.
CHAIRF~%~ CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:00 P.M.
RAY CASEY, 15090 Avenue of Science, #200, San Diego,
representing Presley of San Diego, answered questions by
the Commission reqarding the changes in the development.
COMMISSIONER FORD suggested that the project be
conditioned to complete the recreation area prior to
occupancy of Phase One.
RAY CASEY stated that he saw no problem in fulfilling
that Condition.
ALEX~NDER URQUHkRT, Crosby Mead Benton & Associates,
5650 E1 Camino Real, #200, Carlsbad, project engineering
manager, stated the applicants concurrence with the
changes to Condition 37 and answered questions by the
Commission about the development.
C~AIRMA~ CHINIAEFF expressed a concern for the exterior
maintenance of the project. The applicant was proposing
that the individual homeowners maintain the exterior
walls and wood fencing and the Homeowners Association
maintain the front yard landscaping. After discussion
the applicant agreed to have the exterior walls as well
as the front yard landscaping maintained by the
Homeowners Association. The applicant was also proposing
that the CSD maintain the exterior walls of the project.
~ARY THORNHILL stated that the exterior project walls
would be the Homeowners Association's responsibility as
well; however, CSD would maintain the exterior
landscaping.
CO~ISSIONER FORD moved to close the public hearing at
7:25 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Adopt
the Addendum to EIR No. 281 for Tentative Tract Map No.
26861 and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next) recommending
approval of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 26861, and
Variance No. 7, subject to the Conditions of Approval
with Condition 37 and Condition 68 modified and adding a
PCMIN5/20/91 -4- MAY 24, 1991
PL~qN~N~ CO~SS~ON ~NUTES I~Y 20, 1991
condition requesting construction of the recreation area
to be completed prior to first occupancy of Phase One
and the addition of a condition relating to the CC&R's
for the provisions of access and maintenance by the
Homeowners Association, seconded by COl~ISSIONER
HOAGLAND.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF declared a five minute recess at 7:25 P.M.
The meeting reconvened at 7:30 P.M.
GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission that the presentation on the
Sphere of Influence (Item No. 3) would have to be postponed to
later in the meeting to allow the speaker to arrive.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF stepped down on the following item, due to a
conflict of interest and turned the gavel over to Vice Chairman
Ford.
5. PLOT PLAN NO. 10969
5.1
Proposal to construction a 1700 square foot commercial
building with a 1700 square foot residential caretakers
unit on the second floor. Located on Main Street, south
side between Front and Mercedes.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
VICE CHAIRMANFORD opened the public hearing at 7:35 P.M.
ROBERT MORRIS, applicant, stated that he concurred with
the staff report and the Conditions of Approval.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing
at 7:40 P.M. and Adopt the Negative Declaration for Plot
Plan No. 10969 and Adopt Resolution 91-/next) approving
Plot Plan No. 10969 subject to the Conditions of
Approval, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff
PCMIN5/20/9i -5- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF returned to his seat.
MAY 20, 1991
e
PARCEL MAP NO. 25349
6.1 Proposal for a three lot subdivision of 8.2 acres.
Located at the eastern terminus of Jeramie Drive.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
DOUG STEWART advised that staff would like to change
the wording of Condition 31 to read "All weather access
road to the nearest access road."
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 7:50 P.M.
RICHARD CRUZEN, Alba Engineering, 9968 Hibert Street,
Suite 100, San Diego, representing the applicant,
requested that the Commission eliminate Condition 30
curb and gutter and proposed to pave the cul-de-sac;
Condition 35 modified to read "subdivider shall provide
or post security or an agreement shall be executed" and
delete the (A) requirement; regarding Condition 42,
Mr. Cruzen advised that the project has been designed
so that each property owner would be responsbile for
grading; and elimination of the requirement for Condition
52.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to close the public hearing
at 8:00 P.M. and Adopt the Negative Declaration for
Tentative Parcel Map No. 25349 and Adopt Resolution No.
91-(next) approving Tentative Tract Map No. 25349,
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, deleting
the requirement for curb and gutter in Condition 30; with
Condition 31 modified to require an "all weather access
road to the nearest paved road"; and deletion of part
(A) of Condition 35; and deleting the requirements for
curb and gutter, street lights and sidewalks of Condition
52, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
7. CHANGE OF ZONE 5755
7.1 Proposal to change zone from MSC to Cl/CP on 8 acres.
Located at the northwest corner of Diaz and Rancho
PCMIN5/20/91 -6- MAY 24, 1991
PLanNING COl~ISSION MINUTES M~Y 20, 1991
California Roads.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:10 P.M.
GARY KATZ, 28765 Single Oak Drive, Temecula, representing
Bedford Properties, concurred with the staff report.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR asked the applicant what types of
businesses would be going in if the zone was changed.
The applicant indicated that they currently did not have
any definite uses.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND questioned the control of the
proposed uses once the zoning is changed.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that if the applicant is proposing
a permitted use under the zone, the Commission would be
unable to do anything about it. He added that the
Commission could reject the application as presented
without any findings.
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at
8:15 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Deny
adoption of a Negative Declaration for Change of Zone
No. 5755 and Deny adoption of Resolution 91-(next)
recommending approval of Change of Zone No. 5755,
seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
Due to the busy intersection at this location the
Commission expressed a concern for approving a zone
change when the proposed uses was undetermined.
PLOT PLAN 10675, EXTENSION OF TIME
8.1
Request for extension of time for Plot Plan 10675, a
two story office building. Located on the south side
of Single Oak Drive, 300 feet east of Business Park
Drive, Temecula.
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
PCMIN5/20/91 -7- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY Z0, 1991
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:20 P.M.
GARY KATZ, 28765 Single Oak Drive, Temecula, representing
Bedford Properties, concurred with the staff report.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
8:20 P.M. and approve the extension of time for Plot Plan
10675, seconded by COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND.
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 10
9.1
Request to operate a rental car facility from an existing
retail center. Located at 27472 Jefferson Avenue,
Temecula.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report. Mr. Mujica
advised the Commission that the proposal was to operate
a rental "car only" facility.
COMMISSIONER FORD recommended that Condition 9 be
modified to read "stored, parked or rented."
CMAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opended the public hearing at 8:25
P.M.
STEVE CANNING, 27472 Jefferson Avenue, Temecula,
requested that Condition 13 be deleted and confirmed that
the requirement under Condition 14 is $2.00 per square
foot; that Line (A) of Condition 9 be amended to read
"shall not be stored".
COMMISSIONER FORD questioned if the applicant would be
willing to restrict the rental to a one ton or less
truck.
The applicant expressed a willingness to concur.
COMMISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
8:30 P.M. and AdoDt Resolution 91-(next) approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 10 subject to the Conditions
of Approval modified as follows: delete Condition 5;
Condition No. 9 modified to read "No truck over one ton
shall be stored as part of this use"; and Condition No.
14 as proposed by the City Attorney's office. Assistant
PCMIN5/20/91 -8- MAY 24, 1991
PLAI~NING CO~ISSTON I(INUTES MAY 20, L99L
City Attorney JOHN CAVANAUGH read Condition 14 into the
records, seconded by CO~fi~ISSIONER HO&GLAND, who requested
that Condition 5 be modified to read "shall maintain a
maximum of 15 parking spaces for the use.", rather than
delete Condition 5. CO~fi~ISSIONER FAHEY concurred with
the amendment to the motion.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PLOT PLAN 69 (REV.)
Proposal to add transmission and receiving equipment on
an existing antenna Tower. Located west of 1-15 and
south of Front Street.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
C~IRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 8:30
P.M.
JEFF BROWN, Fastrax Developer Services, 17281 Shrier
Drive, Lake Elsinore, representing the applicant, was
available to answer any questions by the Commission.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to close the public hearing
at 8:40 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91- (next)
recommending that the City Council approve Plot Plan
No. 69 (Rev.), seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
12. PARCEL MAP 2~769, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME ANENDED #3 and
13. REVISED PARCEL I~P 21769
12.1 Proposal for second extension of time for Parcel Map
21769 to create four parcels on a 91.4 acre site.
13.1 Proposal to create three parcels on a 91.4 acre site.
Located on Rainbow Canyon Road, immediately south of
Temecula Creek Inn.
PCMIN5/20/91 -9- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION HINUTE8 MAY 20, L99~
STEVE JIANNINO provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opended the public hearing at 8:45
P.M.
DAVID JA~ES, Ranpac Engineering, 27447 Enterprise Circle
West, Temecula, concurred with the Conditions of
Approval.
DEANE HANNING, R Mansur, 44501 Rainbow Canyon Road,
Temecula, spoke in favor of the proposal and requested
that the following conditions of approval be deleted:
Conditions 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 and 20 and that
Condition No. 14 be moved to Condition No. 1.
STEVE JIANNINO advised the Commission that the purpose
of the map for for financing reasons only.
GARY THORNHILL concurred with Mr. Manning and requested
to delete Condition numbers 5, 6, 7, 9, 10 and modify 12
to read, "wherever feasible".
DOUG STEWART stated that staff would recommend leaving
Condition No. 18 as is and Condition No. 20 modified to
read "An agreement for development of a loop road shall
be executed for construction of internal loop roads at
the discretion of the City Engineer."
COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at
8:55 P.M. and Adopt Resolution 91-(next) recommending
that the City Council approve a Second Extension of Time
for Parcel Map 21769 Amended No. 3, seconded by
COMMISSIONER FORD.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to close the public hearing
at 8:55 P.M. and recommend that the City Council Receive
and File Revised Parcel Map No. 21769 subject to the
Conditions of Approval as modified by staff, seconded by
COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
AYES: 5
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
PCMIN5/20/9[ -10- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 20, 1991
14. VARIANCE NO, 6
14.1
Proposal for Variance in order to allow an additional
freestanding sign display in lieu of the maximum
allowed freestanding signs per Ordinance 348.
Applicant requested item be continue to meeting of
June 3, 1991.
15.
16.
SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE NO. 17 and
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 26766; and SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
NO. 17
15.1
Proposal to allow the exchange of one (1) dwelling unit
of density from Planning area 14 to Planning area 13 of
Specific Plan No. 199. Located at the Southwest corner
of Rancho California Road and Vintage Hills Drive.
16.1
Proposal to subdivide 10.81 acres into one (1) single
family residential lot and one (1) open space parcel.
Located on the south side of Rancho California Road
between Butterfield Stage Road and Vintage Hills Drive.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
COMMISSIONER FORD stepped down due to a conflict of
interest.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at 9:05
P.M.
ROBERT KEMBLE, Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates,
representing the applicant, stated that the applicant
has already participated in the payment of Quimby Fees
as required in Condition 14; and that Conditions 28 and
45 be amended to reflect the wording provided by the
City Attorney.
JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that Condition 14 could be
deleted, and Conditions 28 and 45 could be deleted under
the Substantial Conformance; however, should remain
under the Tentative Parcel Map.
COMMISSIONER HOAGLANDmoved to close the public hearing
at 9:10 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next)
approving Substantial Conformance No. 17, seconded by
COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
PCMIN5/20/91 -11- MAY 24, 1991
PL~-~-RIN~ COI, fi~ISSION MINUTES I~Y 20, 1991
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Ford
COMMISSIONER HOAHLANDmoved to close the public hearing
at 9:10 P.M. and Adopt Resolution No. 91-(next)
approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 26766 subject to the
Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition 14 and
modifying Conditions 28 and 45 per the language provided
by the City Attorney, seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
AYES: 4
COMMISSIONERS:
Blair, Fahey, Hoagland,
Chiniaeff
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSTAIN:i COMMISSIONERS: Ford
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF declared a recess at 9:15 P.M.
reconvened at 9:20 P.M.
The meeting
17. WESTERN RIDHELINE POLICIES
17.1
Proposal to develop interim Hillside and Open Space
Policies to be used as the City of Temecula's Western
Ridgeline Policies until the General Plan is adopted.
OLIVER MUJICA provided the staff report.
CHAIRMAN CHINIAEFF opened the public hearing at
9:20 P.M.
MARK ACErEDO, 27~75 Ynez Road, Suite 136, Temecula,
representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce,
stated that the Chamber recognizes the importance of
having a plan in place. He added that the Chamber
feels that the Western Corridor is imperative to the
business of the community and that the Western Ridgeline
Policy should have language implemented to address this
corridor.
JOSEPH SCHNEIDER, 29951 Camino Del Sol, Temecula,
stated that although he endorses a hillside/ridgeline
policy, he feels that the City is premature in
adopting policies in an area that has not yet been
determined in the City's sphere of influence;
PCMIN5/20/91 -12- MAY 24, 1991
PLANN'rNG COI,~IS8ION MINUTE8 ~,Y 20, ~.99~.
however, if the City believes it is legal to adopt
these policies he would endorse staff's recommendation.
LEROY GRUNDER, 6012 Richfield Road, Yorba Linda,
advised the Commission that he has not received any
information on the proposal and therefore would
oppose the policy.
KELLY JUNE, 6242 Guthrie Street, San Bernadino,
stated that she opposed the proposed policies
due to the effects on her property.
JOHN PATTON, 4817 Bionz Drive, San Diego, stated that
this area was not in the City's sphere of influence
and therefore feels that the City should not be
adopting any policies that affect his property.
LARRYN~RKHAM, Markham & Associates, 41750 Winchester
Road, Temecula, representing Judy Rosen and Associates,
stated that staff had deleted SWAP policy No. 9 and
would recommend that this policy be put back into the
Western Ridgeline Policy. Mr. Markham gave a picture
presentation on ways that the City could address the
development of the ridgeline.
GARY THORNHILL stated that although the ridgeline is
not in the City's sphere of influence, the City does
not have a sphere of influence in place; however, the
the upper portion of the ridgeline is in the City's
proposed sphere of influence that has been presented
to LAFCO.
Mr. Thornhill stated that he concurred with alot of
what Mr. Markham was proposing in his presentation
and would be willing to sit down and discuss some of
the issues.
CH~II~V. AN CHINIAEFF suggested that staff take the policy
back and implement some of the recommendations made by
Mr. Markham. He suggested that they hold off approving
any policies until the sphere of influence has been
determined.
CO~14ISSIONER FAHEY moved to close the public hearing at
9:55 P.M. and continue the Western Ridgeline Policies
off-calendar to allow to work on some of the.
recommendations presented in the public hearing,
seconded by COMMISSIONER BLAIR.
PCMIN5/20/91 -13- MAY 24, 1991
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AYES: 5 COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS:
MAY 20, 1991
Blair, Fahey, Ford,
Hoagland, Chiniaeff
None
NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
3.1
Presentation by Bill Meecham on the status of the Sphere
of Influence process.
PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT
GARY THORNHILL advised the Commission of the following:
* The City Council approved The Planning Center as the consultant
to prepare the general plan.
Proposed joint meeting between the City Council and the
Commission for the middle of June.
* Currently working on the transition of contract staff to
permanent staff.
* Introduced Tim Serlet, City Engineer.
PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION
None
OTHER BUSINESS
None
PCMIN5/20/91 -14- MAY 24, 1991
PL~NN~N~ CO~,~SS~ON N~NUTES M~,Y 20, ~99~
ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONER HOAGLAND moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 P.M.,
seconded by COMMISSIONER FAHEY.
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning
Commission to be held Monday, June 3, 1991, 7:00 P.M. at Vail
Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula.
CHINIAEFF
PCMIN5/20/9i -15- MAY 24, 1991