Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout010715 PC AgendaIn compliance, with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 7, 2015 — 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 15 -01 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Harter Roll Call: Guerriero, Harter, Kight, Telesio and Turley -Trejo PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS 1 Presentation by Planning Commission to Earlene Bundy PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time limit for individual speakers. Z19111191:111111 119111111 All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Action Minutes of November 5, 2014 Director's Hearing Summary Report RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and File COMMISSION BUSINESS 4 Elect 2015 Chairperson and Vice Chairperson PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Planning Application No. PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to construct a three - story. 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel totaling 31,270 feet, within the Old Town Specific Plan area, including an indoor swimming pool, fitness room and business center, located at 41841 Moreno Road, Eric Jones 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0058, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY 54 ROOM COMFORT SUITES HOTEL TOTALING 31,263 SQUARE FEET. WITHIN THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, INCLUDING AN INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, FITNESS ROOM, AND BUSINESS CENTER, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), LOCATED AT 41841 MORENO ROAD (APN 921 -070- 011) Planning Application Nos. PA14 -0219, a Home Product Review for KB Homes that includes four floor plans with four elevation styles and three color schemes per style and PA14 -2909, a Minor Exception for the side yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the corner side setback from 15 feet to 13 feet, located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, James Atkins RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0219 AND PA14 -2909, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW KB HOME TO CONSTRUCT 99 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN RORIPAUGH RANCH AND A MINOR EXCEPTION FOR THE SIDE -YARD SETBACK ON LOT 41 TO REDUCE THE CORNERSIDE SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 13 FEET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE SITE IS LOCATED IN RORIPAUGH RANCH ON TR 29661 -1 (PLANNING AREA 2) AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (APNS: 957- 710 -001 — 012; 957- 711 -001 — 044; 957- 712 -001 — 014; 957 - 713 -001 — 013; 957 - 720 -001 — 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; AND 957- 723 -001) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, January 21, 2015, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orc — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orc — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694 -6400. ITEM 1 V •;. 9 ITEM 2 In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]. ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 5, 2014 — 6:00 PM Next in Order: Resolution: 14 -24 CALL TO ORDER: Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero Roll Call: Guerriero, Harter, Kight, Telesio and Turley -Trejo Staff Attendees: Villa, Garcia, Klima, Fisk and Jones NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 15, 2014: Approve the Action Minutes of October 1, 2014 APPROVED 3- 0 -0 -2; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TURLEY- TREJO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS HARTER, KIGHT AND TURLEY- TREJO; GUERRIERO, TELESIO ABSTAINED 1.2 Approve the Action Minutes of October 15, 2014 APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 (FOR ITEM 3); MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO, TURLEY- TREJO; KIGHT ABSTAINED. APPROVED 3 -0 -0 -2 (FOR ITEMS 4 AND 5) MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO AND TURLEY- TREJO; HARTER, KIGHT ABSTAINED PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. Planning Application No. PA14 -0101 a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a hookah and cigar lounge to operate within an existing shopping center, located at 27515 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 3- 1 -0 -1; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, KIGHT AND TELESIO; TURLEY -TREJO VOTED NO, HARTER ABSTAINED RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14 -0101, A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A HOOKAH AND CIGAR LOUNGE WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 27515 JEFFERSON AVENUE AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 909 -240- 026) 3 Planning Application No. PA14 -0141, a Minor Modification to allow a facade improvement to an existing two -story office building, located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. approximately 500 feet north of the Jefferson Avenue and Via Montezuma intersection at 27708 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 5 -0; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, KIGHT, TELESIO AND TURLEY -TREJO RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 14 -25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0141, A MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW A FACADE IMPROVEMENT TO AN EXISTING TWO -STORY OFFICE BUILDING GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF THE JEFFERSON AVENUE AND VIA MONTEZUMA INTERSECTION AT 27708 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APNS 921 - 400 -033, 921 - 400 -037) REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S) DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Wednesday, December 3, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Stanley Harter Chairman Armando G. Villa, AICP Director of Community Development ITEM 3 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development DATE: January 7, 2015 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report Planning Director's Agenda items for October and December, 2014 October 23, 2014 PA14 -0126 A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula Nick Tomlison APPROVED CrossFit to operate a specialized fitness gymnasium within an existing vacant 6,960 square foot office /industrial suite, located at 43475 Business Park Drive December 11, 2014 PA14 -0191 A Conditional Use Permit for Forza One Dana APPROVED Performance Volleyball to utilize 39,835 Burkholder square feet of an existing building for indoor Attachment: Action Agendas ACTION AGENDAS ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2014 1:30 P.M. TEMECULA CITY HALL Great Oak Conference Room 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Director of Community Development on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description Location: Environmental Action Project Planner: ACTION: 1:30 p.m. PA14 -0126 Conditional Use Permit Temecula CrossFit Nick Thomlison A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula CrossFit to operate a specialized fitness gymnasium within an existing vacant 6,960 square foot office /industrial suite 43474 Business Park Drive Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities James Atkins APPROVED NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Director's Hearing. At that time, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM —5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694 -6400. ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 11, 2014 1:30 P.M. TEMECULA CITY HALL Great Oak Conference Room 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Director of Community Development on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Director. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address. Item No. 1 Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: Project Planner: ACTION: 1:30 p.m. PA14 -0191 Conditional Use Permit Forza One Performance Volleyball Dana Burkholder A Conditional Use Permit to utilize 39,835 square feet of an existing building for indoor volleyball Mondaythrough Friday from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., and Saturday and Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. 27711 Diaz Road Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities James Atkins APPROVED NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Director's Hearing. At that lime, the agenda packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.oro — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda Any supplemental material distributed regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM -5:00 PM). m addition, such material may be accessed on the City's websile — www.citvoftemecula.oro — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic Center, (951) 694 -6400. ITEM 4 ELECT 2015 CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR ITEM 5 STAFF REPORT— PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2015 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Eric Jones. Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Number PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to SUMMARY: construct a three - story, 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel totaling 31,263 square feet, within the Old Town Specific Plan area, including an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business center, located at 41841 Moreno Road RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Firas Jamal General Plan Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Designation: Zoning Designation: Specific Plan No. 5 (Old Town) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation Lot Area: North: Moreno Road, Existing Restaurant/Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Existing Parking Lot, Commercial Structure /Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) East: Existing Hotel, Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Existing Commercial Structure /Specific Plan Implementation Existing /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required 0.78 Acres 0.7 Acres Total Floor Area /Ratio: 0.91 N/A Landscape Area /Coverage: 3,102 Square Feet N/A Parking Required /Provided: 54 Parking Spaces 54 Parking Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY On March 18, 2014, Firas Jamal submitted Planning Application PA14 -0058, a Development Plan application to allow for the construction of a three -story 31,263 square foot hotel at 41841 Moreno Road within the Old Town Specific Plan. Hotels are permitted uses in the R /LMU district upon the approval of a Development Plan. The application was reviewed by the Old Town Local Review Board on September 8, 2014. The Board expressed support for the project and provided no objections or design revisions. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project is located in the R /LMU district, 250 feet east of the corner of Old Town Front Street and Moreno Road. The building is designed to provide active street frontage along Moreno Road. The main entrance to the hotel is located on the west elevation. Pedestrians along Moreno Road will reach this entrance via a walkway along the western elevation. A small tower element has been located at the start of this walkway at the public right -of -way. This will create a focal point to guide pedestrians to the main entrance. A series of covered patios are also located along Moreno Road. The westernmost patio will contain a seating area for guests using the continental breakfast facility. The middle patio will provide outdoor space for the indoor swimming pool. The easternmost patio will provide access for three suites and the exercise room. Vehicular access to the hotel will be off Moreno Road on the west side of the project site. This access point will guide vehicles to the parking lot located at the rear of the structure. Trash service for the building will also be provided from this vehicular connection. The parking lot will feature decorative pavers and landscaping throughout and will be substantially screened from the street mostly by the hotel. The applicant has proposed 54 parking spaces for the use. The spaces meet the one space per guest room requirement of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP). The applicant is also proposing ten off -site parking spaces along Moreno Road. The location of these spaces is consistent with the requirements of the OTSP (Figure IV -83). These spaces are not counted toward the on -site parking requirement for the use. The Specific Plan establishes a build -to -line for all new buildings. Within the R /LMU district, the building is required to be placed ten feet behind the street side property line. Arcades are allowed to encroach into this space. The proposed building will meet the build -to line requirement along the building frontage. In addition to build -to -line requirements, the Specific Plan establishes allowable building and frontage types appropriate for a vibrant public realm. The proposed project incorporates the Commercial Block building type and Gallery frontage type which are permitted in the R /LMU district. The building meets all design requirements and standards, including building height, access, landscaping, size, and massing for this style. The application is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and has proposed an effective design to create a vibrant streetscape. Architecture The architectural design of the building is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. The three -story building incorporates a Spanish Renaissance architectural style. The structure includes smooth stucco finish, decorative wrought iron details, arcades with round arches, ceramic tile accents, and clay tile roofing. These elements are represented on all elevations of the structure. Landscaping Trees in both 24" and 15 box sizes will be used with a variety of shrubs and other plants in five - gallon containers. These plants will help shield the parking lot from view and soften the building along the streetscape. All plant material used will be consistent with the requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on December 26, 2014 and mailed to the property owners within 1,100 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects). The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is located within City limits on a site of no more than five acres. The site recently contained a restaurant use that has since been completely destroyed by fire. It therefore has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The site is also surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. N111 I�Le'? The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. Hotels are an allowable use within the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. ATTACHMENTS Vicinity Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing VICINITY MAP x Project Site lD / / /�`V^YV/ Y L`1 2� wo 1,000 GAP PLAN REDUCTIONS - 1:4:�: 33 b• I : YF 1RML � _ S �t. -\ 5• Yb s P 50 49 48 47 0.6 45 \ g = \ 131 i R1f• -s - .. 30 9 Rl PE r �o. • Sl v — 36'Ii 4 38 39 40 41,.E 42 43, G / 64 G o i aroc° =x`23' 24 20 21 22 17 18 g 10� it 12 1 r '���s _ _ —_ s�o•wmNErcv Q �� 0. �� � wm.rc EA. ST LE Y6 irs �w a.om Er. 1. Lor T wixiw SITE PLAN � �. spew Ya asar� }zz M oTVaurRY+� � w-ores sew�,�ac z Q .r�nEn u o yay ImRYIY WRST 9�br YCIBO I4 �Eml CESCRPr4w lOT 5, IACI M. 1.. Y9. 91/31 E H E:R nC1® iM•S�0•E wF.i � sn mrr. .w•YC � m m.. m Iv�w�trr ;gym mmm nrm) • wwx anYmn9. sam i¢KD N90P® wuL�a.Yaw� vm m b r WOn 6�P doses wmo� roaun no¢vn9+ aae: a o N �V a's' m mrmRi 6 �nACn F_ 'c � aw wmu 1. omvlYr OlR RqY( ➢: i Fu19 TA Sfdm MTIID i EtlR raw awmc .rw 3 v3 mn. � u Na2m FFn2.w �mmH Z m N o won +4u M m L A;D; - yS _ _ _ _ ... —___ —_ ._w- Ems_ _— _— ___ —_ —_ —_ _ _ ______- -_ —_ " MORENO RD. a•wu�'YaTS miw iia ti .� Ing PVT - {:{ vL �� PROPOSED 3 -STORY HOTEL \ - 1:4:�: 33 b• I : YF 1RML � _ S �t. -\ 5• Yb s P 50 49 48 47 0.6 45 \ g = \ 131 i R1f• -s - .. 30 9 Rl PE r �o. • Sl v — 36'Ii 4 38 39 40 41,.E 42 43, G / 64 G o i aroc° =x`23' 24 20 21 22 17 18 g 10� it 12 1 r '���s _ _ —_ s�o•wmNErcv Q �� 0. �� � wm.rc EA. ST LE Y6 irs �w a.om Er. 1. Lor T wixiw SITE PLAN � �. spew Ya asar� }zz M oTVaurRY+� � w-ores sew�,�ac z Q .r�nEn u o yay ImRYIY WRST 9�br YCIBO I4 �Eml CESCRPr4w lOT 5, IACI M. 1.. Y9. 91/31 E H E:R nC1® iM•S�0•E wF.i � sn mrr. .w•YC � m m.. m Iv�w�trr ;gym mmm nrm) • wwx anYmn9. sam i¢KD N90P® wuL�a.Yaw� vm m b r WOn 6�P doses wmo� roaun no¢vn9+ aae: a o N �V a's' m mrmRi 6 �nACn F_ 'c � aw wmu 1. omvlYr OlR RqY( ➢: i Fu19 TA Sfdm MTIID i EtlR raw awmc .rw 3 v3 mn. � u Na2m FFn2.w �mmH Z m N o won +4u M m L A;D; - 5W 4 664 > n G o �pn Qwap 'o �O O 4�0�T ... _ ¢ J l s s =s o 0 o door W��d - - - - _� °� p �. W. r m V O FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1 /8- MAM1 m4 FJ. %W 0.0piflAN Ai ao 0 i¢ &x yFga - _ 0 O O O O L O _ d n__� , d SEOORO BOOR PLW SGLE i /8' WM1 sy f1 NODII1All Az R FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/9 ao 6¢ae �m US P ¢ m ¢2s $f ti eF V2 n uNsN ZyJ�m w <On F 'm z V O it flODtl/N11 SCALE ct /B "�V EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1 /B' C9 L ^4 SOUTH ELEVAT SCAIF 1/8' III! Jill El£N ay xoia B m WES! ELEWTION SCALE C /8' u e a'gs m F $3 m W WJ V PV F 2s �F i n a�5 ENO F1 Or ReW . 6 r_ moo° SL y z._ EW � wulcl razuxG Rv- ME 1 EwM® wx0.'� RIx1G Y1EY - irt[ � Z SCYE i F' . V SOYRS SCAIE SECTION B -B SECTION A -A 1 /8- SCAtE t /8° Oa ° 8 p a ¢Zs ,. .ft O�J Lei4 - F� v ° J FRONT ELEVATION —__ _ •, - / . ROOF WIF sM m v SIDE ELEVATION �x A5 g§ Y� K■ mO 00000 O 0 0 0 0 0 6 i� �c�c��E,s6c0cicil,a� ii �q cie4ic� ['fit ql igi;si i� ic' EI Oc� �� fill 11 PIG ■ �I a K. jF T� 3 !Ilk IE 11 ( DESIGN BY: ep { MIDCIT)E ENGINEERING INC 9744 M. 1101 VATgNS OMER MR PATEL BELLTL0MRCAW70 T1IaIMOBENCI 931BBLO0MFlELDAW. F 3 TEL (323) 63o-9555 TEMECULA CA 92590 CEMTOS, CA 90703 4 IF TEL(3 +o)91bNaa t SUITES • __ i i R f11� L r- Lwow �L. . �L bomo l Mm's Ill INE A %ma' x= ,t C O x I AWL Jo"I 07� ®® OQ, �� I I � I N I p r I I y 1 • m. l{ �i. I J fib N I m A 1 f 3'I N TAI N 4 P •Y M 0 1 ' L 1,, ? P N �® l;� � III � "� I • � r Y � ff R 6' e� i �!� Ii ,I F i �i� ,eY0�7�QpII�IaA',l�9C�pi 9 9I ! Rt R�¢ R j lip i „ F 2 DESIGN BY: MIDCRIES ENGINUMW INC LANDSCAPE PUN OMMEA: MR PATEL i- L q 11 9]HMAPLEST -hC: 41851MORENORD. 19318BLOOMRELDAW. SL 4 F BE OMR U 9om TEMECUU U 92590 aWTOS, U 9o7o3 j TEL (32)) 63 --9555 TEL (3,.) 918,4). 2 S J a, a .1 A � ( v Q a� I I N i r IT a ! A I 4 1 m � i m I� A n' i !• i O P I u iI P r:C i N I 0 f fl _ • I �� I • a. • dP 1111,11 111illil i�Jill MIN 8t8t1�FF�N1E D 1 � � r. I (I Iii (f � II jl 1� i l!i f I �i� �eID���E� I�•1�1� € °6di b j) � 1 1 i' X 1 1 a ♦ �� ® ®e ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®o ® ®0000 �! I � � bt�w �iia P f1" ^M Ipx a• 'I r` fe$1 DESIGN BY: MIDCITIE5 ENGINEERING INC LANDSCAXPAN OWNER: MR. PATEI 5 9744MAPIEST.Nm 41841MORENORD, 19318 BLOOMFIELDAVE. f ✓� 41 BELLFLOWEP, CA W706 TEMECULACA9T590 CERRITOS, CA W7)3 r TEL (323)6309555 TEL (310) 91 &1420 wl PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0058, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY 54 ROOM COMFORT SUITES HOTEL TOTALING 31,263 SQUARE FEET. WITHIN THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, INCLUDING AN INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, FITNESS ROOM, AND BUSINESS CENTER, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), LOCATED AT 41841 MORENO ROAD (APN 921 - 070 -011) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On March 18, 2014, Firas Jamal filed Planning Application No. PA14- 0058, Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 7, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA14 -0058 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plans, Development Code Section 17.05.010. A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; Hotels are an allowable use within the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore the use will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and other Ordinances of the City. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, Type 32); The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is located within city limits on a site of no more than five acres. The site recently contained a restaurant use that has since been completely destroyed by fire. It therefore has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The site is also surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to construct a three -story 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel within the Old Town Specific Plan area totaling 31,263 square feet. The hotel will be located at 41841 Moreno Road. Amenities will include an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business center subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of January, 2015. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of January, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA14 -0058 Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a three -story, 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel totaling 31,263 square feet, within the Old Town Specific Plan area, including an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business center, located at 41841 Moreno Roada Assessor's Parcel No. MSHCP Category: DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION 921 - 070 -011 Commercial Service Commercial Service Commercial N/A (Non - Residential Project) January 7, 2014 January 7, 2016 Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project PL -1. Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements PL -2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -3. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -4. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. PL -5. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -6. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 5 Old Town. PL -7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. PL -8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. PL -9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. PL -11. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three - foot -by- three -foot section of the building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. PL -12. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -13. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. MATERIAL Main Walls, Foam Trim — Smooth Stucco Finish Exposed Wood Rafter Tails Clay Tile Roofing Wrought Iron Railing Window Mullions COLOR Colortek Ivory #20 — Comparable to Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette Classical White SW2829 Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette Rookwood Dark Brown SW2808 Ustile by Boral - 70% Red, 15% Mallorca, 15% Tuscany Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette Black Magic SW6991 Milgard, Chocolate — Comparable to Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette Rookwood Dark Brown SW2808 PL -14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. PL -15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) PL -16. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. PL -17. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right -of -way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. PL -18. Archaeological /Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director." PL -19. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project, as well as provisions for tribal monitors. PL -20. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment and mitigation." PL -21. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property." PL -22. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: 'Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the developer." PL -23. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: 'The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition." PL -24. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved." PL -25. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -26. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. PL -27. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. PL -28. Maintenance /Facility Removal Agreement. The maintenance /facility removal agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section 17.40.210 of the Ordinance. PL -29. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. PL -30. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized PL -31. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -32. Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five -foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. PL -33. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -34. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -35. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -36. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -37. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -38. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). PL -39. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within private common areas. PL -40. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. PL -41. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. PL -42. WQMP Treatment Devices. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details, shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. PL -43. Roof - Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development approval. PL -44. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. PL -45. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -46. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent residences and public right -of -ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right -of -way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. PL -47. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -48. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -49. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. PL -50. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. OUTSIDE AGENCIES PL -51. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated November 7, 2014, a copy of which is attached. PL -52. Compliance with The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Pechanga letter transmittal dated July 3, 2014, a copy of which is attached. PL -53. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated March 25, 2014, a copy of which is attached. PL -54. Compliance with the County Geologist. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated March 31, 2014. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Conditions B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B -2. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013 California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. B -3. Green Measures. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on the project, as stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards B -4. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. All ground floor units to be adaptable. b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Path of travel from public right -of -way to all public areas on site, such as club house, trash enclose tot lots and picnic areas. B -5. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of- way. B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi - family residential projects or a recorded final map for single - family residential projects. B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to Building and Safety to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B -10. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits B -11. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. B -12. House Electrical Meter. Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. At Plan Review Submittal B -13. Submitting Plans and Calculations. four (4) complete sets of plans and and approval including: Applicant must submit to Building and Safety two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) B -14. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. B -15. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing structure to be removed as part of the project. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) B -16. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. Prior to Beginning of Construction B -17. Pre- Construction Meeting. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements F -1. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. F -2. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000 GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration for commercial projects projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -3. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" 2 ''/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced 350 feet apart at each intersection, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for commercial projects. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -4. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) F -5. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -6. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for commercial and track home roads and 20 feet for custom homes residential driveways with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) F -7. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 5 and Chapter 33). F -8. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. F -9. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy F -10. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -11. Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and /or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). F -12. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). F -13. Site Plan: The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or signs (CFC Chapter 5). F -14. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements PD -1. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would -be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. PD -2. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would -be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot clearance from the buildings. PD -3. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. PD -4. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. PD -5. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. PD -6. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. PD -7. Outdoor Lighting During Non - Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non - business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non - business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations PD -8. Commercial or Institution Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. PD -9. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24 -hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP. PD -10. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi- tenant offices /suites /businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. PD -11. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." PD -12. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. PD -13. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well -lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only" feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. PD -14. Disable Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. PD -15. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail /credit card theft, citizens' arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. PD -16. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi - public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. PD -17. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 506 -5132. PD -18. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 506 -5132. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PW -1. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes /standards at no cost to any governmental agency. PW -2. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. PW -3. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for onsite improvements (outside of public right -of -way) shall be obtained from Public Works. PW -4. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required. An encroachment permit shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. PW -5. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public /private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes /standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing /proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. PW -6. Right -of -Way Dedications. All easements and /or right -of -way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. PW -7. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. PW -8. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT(S) PW -9. Grading /Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading /erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction -phase pollution - prevention controls to adequately address non - permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: http:// www .cityoftemecuIa.org/TemecuIa/ Government /PublicWorks /engineeringcons tmanual.htm PW -10. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security for private development and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. PW -11. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http: / /www.waterboa rd s. ca.gov /water_issues /prog rams /sto rmwate r /construction. s html PW -12. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O &M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project - specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O &M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below: http:// www .cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/ Government /PublicWorks/WQMPandNPD ES/WQMP.htm PW -13. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and /or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. PW -14. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100 -year storm event) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. PW -15. Flood plain /Floodwav Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a Conditional Letter of Map Revision ( CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA- approved CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. PW -16. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. PW -17. Letter of Permission /Easements. The developer shall coordinate with adjacent property owners affected by the project's improvements and shall obtain the required documents such as letters of permission, easement(s) and /or maintenance agreement(s) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. PW -18. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut -off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. PW -19. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT(S) PW -20. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right -of -way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. PW -21. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. PW -22. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. PW -23. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT(S) PW -24. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City's Old Town Specific Plan and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to join existing street improvements. a. Moreno Road (Old Town Specific Plan - Alternative 1 — 88' RAN) to include installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). PW -25. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of- record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of- record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY PW -26. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all onsite work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. PW -27. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearances from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. PW -28. Replacement of Damaged Improvements /Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. PW -29. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of- record certifying satisfactory completion of all improvements per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer —of - record certifying the final compaction. r;OUN1 Y OF RIVERS] QF- DEPAR'. MENT OF ENVIROI.MENTAL HEALTF Steve Van Stock-um. Director City of Temecula Planning Department c/o Eric Jones 0 PO BOX 9033 Ho''•' Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 t✓ 07 November 2014 \' RE: PA14 -0058 The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA 14 -0058 for a Development Plan (DP) to construct a three (3) story 54 rooms Comfort Suites Hotel within the Old Town Specific Plan area, under the applicant: Jamal Firas The planning application statement of building area is 7,556 sf and 22,153 sf for parking. The amenities will include an indoor heated swimming pool, fitness room and business center (APN 921- 070 -011 at 41841 Moreno Road (Old Town). Water and sewer availability for customer use can be found along Moreno Road. A will serve letter should be required by the City of Temecula from the Rancho California Water District for these services. However, breakfast food vending, swimming pool construction or restaurant use of the hotel shall require food and pool plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. Please call Bonnie Dierking, Supervising REHS at 951.461.0284 within 24 hours of the City's receipt fax of these conditions. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.951.8980 Sincerely, SR0032110 Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside Phone: (888)722-4234 www.ri\,coeh.org VIA E -MAIL and USPS Mr. Eric Jones Project Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 PECHANCIA CULTURAL RESOURCES Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Post Office. Box 2183 • Temecula. CA 92593 Telephone (951) 308 -9295 • Fax (951) 506 -9491 July 3. 2014 1")f U � � �8 ?014 Chairperson: Germaine Arenas Vice Chairperson: Mary Bear Magee Committee Members: Evie Gerber Darlene Miranda Bridgen Barcello Maxwel Aumlia Marruffo Richard B. Scearce, III Director: Gary DuBois Coordinator: Paul Macarm Cultural Analyst: Anna Hoover Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites Development Plan Located at 41841 Moreno Road Dear Mr. Jones: This comment letter is written on behalf of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (hereinafter, "the Tribe "), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The Tribe formally requests, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092.2, to be notified and involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration of the above referenced project (the "Project'). Please add the Tribe to your distribution list(s) for public notices and circulation of all documents, including environmental review documents, archeological reports, and all documents pertaining to this Project. The Tribe further requests to be directly notified of all public hearings and scheduled approvals concerning this Project. Please also incorporate these comments into the record of approval for this Project. The Tribe submits these comments concerning the Project's potential impacts to cultural resources in conjunction with the environmental review of the Project and to assist the City in developing appropriate avoidance and preservation standards for the THE CITY OF TEMECULA MUST INCLUDE INVOLVEMENT OF AND CONSULTATION WITH THE PECHANGA TRIBE IN ITS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS It has been the intent of the Federal Government) and the State of California that Indian 'See e.g., Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 on Government -to- Government Relations with Native American Tribal Govemments, Executive Order of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 2 tribes be consulted with regard to issues which impact cultural and spiritual resources, as well as other governmental concerns. The responsibility to consult with Indian tribes stems from the unique government -to- government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. This arises when tribal interests are affected by the actions of governmental agencies and departments. In this case, it is undisputed that the project lies within the Pechanga Tribe's traditional territory. Therefore, in order to comply with CEQA and other applicable Federal and California law, it is imperative that the City of Temecula consult with the Tribe in order to guarantee an adequate knowledge base for an appropriate evaluation of the Project effects, as well as generating adequate mitigation measures. PECHANGA CULTURAL AFFILIATION TO PROJECT AREA The Pechanga Tribe asserts that the Project area is part of Payomkawichuni (Luiseno), and therefore the Tribe's, aboriginal territory as evidenced by the existence of Payomkawichum place names, toola yixelval (rock art, pictographs, petroglyphs), and an extensive Luiseno artifact record in the vicinity of the Project. This culturally sensitive area is affiliated with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians because of the Tribe's cultural ties to this area as well as extensive history with both this Project and other projects within the area. The Pechanga Tribe's knowledge of our ancestral boundaries is based on reliable information passed down to us from our elders; published academic works in the areas of anthropology, history and ethno- history; and through recorded ethnographic and linguistic accounts. Of the many anthropologists and historians who have presented boundaries of the Luiseno traditional territory, none have excluded the City of Temecula from their descriptions (Sparkman 1908; Kroeber 1925; White 1963; Harvey 1974; Oxendine 1983; Smith and Freers 1994), and such territory descriptions correspond almost identically with that communicated to the Pechanga people by our elders. While historic accounts and anthropological and linguistic theories are important in determining traditional Luiseno territory, the most critical sources of information used to define our traditional territories are our songs, creation accounts, and oral traditions. Luiseno history originates with the creation of all things at `exva Temeeku, in the present day City of Temecula, and dispersing out to all comers of creation (what is today known as Luiseno territory). It was at Temecula that the Luiseno deity Wuyoot lived and taught the people, and here that he became sick, finally expiring at Lake Elsinore. Many of our songs relate the tale of the people taking the dying Wuyoot to the many hot springs at Elsinore, where he died (DuBois 1908). He was cremated at `exva Temeeku. It is the Luiseno creation account that connects Elsinore to Temecula, and thus to the Temecula people who were evicted and moved to Indian Tribal Governments, Executive Memorandum of September 23, 2004 on Government -to- Government Relationships with Tribal Governments, and Executive Memorandum of November 5, 2009 on Tribal Consultation. Z See California Public Resource Code §5097.9 et seq.; California Government Code § §65351, 65352.3 and 65352.4 Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Commeots on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 3 the Pechanga Reservation, and now known as the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians (the Pechanga Tribe). From Elsinore, the people spread out, establishing villages and marking their territories. The first people also became the mountains, plants, animals and heavenly bodies. Many traditions and stories are passed from generation to generation by songs. One of the Luiseno songs recounts the travels of the people to Elsinore after a great flood (DuBois 1908). From here, they again spread out to the north, south, east and west. Three songs, called Monilvol, are songs of the places and landmarks that were destinations of the Luiseno ancestors, several of which are located near the Project area. They describe the exact route of the Temecula (Pechanga) people and the landmarks made by each to claim title to places in their migrations (DuBois 1908:110). In addition, Pechanga elders state that the Temecula/Pechanga people had usage /gathering rights to an area extending from Rawson Canyon on the east, over to Lake Mathews on the northwest, down Temescal Canyon to Temecula, eastward to Aguanga, and then along the crest of the Cahuilla range back to Rawson Canyon. The Project area is located within the southern portion of this culturally affiliated territory. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Most Likely Descendent (MLD) files substantiate this habitation and migration record from oral tradition. These examples illustrate a direct correlation between the oral tradition and the physical place; proving the importance of songs and stories as a valid source of information outside of the published anthropological data. T6oia yixelval (rock art) is also an important element in the determination of Luiseno territorial boundaries. T6oia yixelval can consist of petroglyphs (incised) elements, or pictographs (painted) elements. The science of archaeology tells us that places can be described through these elements. Riverside and Northern San Diego Counties are home to red - pigmented pictograph panels. Archaeologists have adopted the name for these pictograph- versions, as defined by Ken Hedges of the Museum of Man, as the San Luis Rey style. The San Luis Rey style incorporates elements which include chevrons, zig -zags, dot patterns, sunbursts, handprints, net/chain, anthropomorphic (human-like) and zoomorphic (animal -like) designs. Tribal historians and photographs inform us that some design elements are reminiscent of Luiseno ground paintings. A few of these design elements, particularly the flower motifs, the net/chain and zig -zags, were sometimes depicted in Luiseno basket designs and can be observed in remaining baskets and textiles today. An additional type of t6ota yixelval, identified by archaeologists also as rock art or petroglyphs, are cupules. Throughout Luiseno territory, there are certain types of large boulders, taking the shape of mushrooms or waves, which contain numerous small pecked and ground indentations, or cupules. Many of these cupule boulders have been identified within a few miles of the Project. Additionally, according to historian Constance DuBois: When the people scattered from Ekvo Temeko, Temecula, they were very powerful. When they got to a place, they would sing a song to make water come there, and would call that place theirs; or they would scoop out a hollow in a rock Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula. CA 92592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 4 with their hands to have that for their mark as a claim upon the land. The different parties of people had their own marks. For instance, Albanas's ancestors had theirs, and Lucario's people had theirs, and their own songs of Munival to tell how they traveled from Temecula, of the spots where they stopped and about the different places they claimed (1908:158). The Tribe knows that the Project area is located within the Luiseno named place of WaSAava and within a very close proximity to the village of Nemevla. Our songs and stories, our indigenous place names, as well as academic works, demonstrate that the Luiseno people who occupied what we know today as the City of Temecula are ancestors of the present -day Luiseno/Pechanga people, and as such, Pechanga is culturally affiliated to this geographic area. The Tribe welcomes the opportunity to meet with the City to further explain and provide documentation concerning our specific cultural affiliation to lands within your jurisdiction. PROJECT IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES: The Project is located in a highly sensitive region of Luiseno territory and the Tribe believes that the possibility for recovering subsurface resources during ground - disturbing activities is high. The Tribe has over thirty -five (35) years of experience in working with various types of construction projects throughout its territory. The combination of this knowledge and experience, along with the knowledge of the culturally- sensitive areas and oral tradition, is what the Tribe relies on to make fairly accurate predictions regarding the likelihood of subsurface resources in a particular location. The Tribe is not opposed to this Project; however, we are opposed to any direct, indirect and cumulative impacts this Project may have to tribal cultural resources. The Tribe's primary concerns stem from the Project's proposed impacts on Native American cultural resources. The Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such as Luiseno village sites, sacred sites and archaeological items which would be displaced by ground disturbing work on the Project, and on the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items, Native American human remains and sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the work. The Tribe requests to be involved and participate with the City of Temecula in assuring that an adequate environmental assessment is completed, and in developing all monitoring and mitigation plans and measures for the duration of the Project. In addition, given the sensitivity of the Project area, it is the position of the Pechanga Tribe that professional Pechanga tribal monitors be required to be present during all ground- disturbing activities conducted in connection with the Project, including any additional archeological excavations performed. Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseho Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Dun, Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 5 The CEQA Guidelines state that lead agencies should make provisions for inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources (CEQA Guidelines §15064.5). As such, it is the position of the Pechanga Tribe that an agreement specifying appropriate treatment of inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources be executed between the Project Applicant/Developer and the Pechanga Tribe. The Tribe believes that adequate cultural resources assessments and management must always include a component which addresses inadvertent discoveries. Every major State and Federal law dealing with cultural resources includes provisions addressing inadvertent discoveries (See e.g.: CEQA (Cal. Pub. Resources Code §21083.2(i); 14 CCR §1506.5(f)); Section 106 (36 CFR §800.13); NAGPRA (43 CFR §10.4). Moreover, most state and federal agencies have guidelines or provisions for addressing inadvertent discoveries (See e.g.: FHWA, Section 4(f) Regulations - 771.135(g); CALTRANS, Standard Environmental Reference - 5- 10.2 and 5- 10.3). Because of the extensive presence of the Tribe's ancestors within the Project area, it is not unreasonable to expect to find vestiges of that presence. Such cultural resources and artifacts are significant to the Tribe as they are reminders of their ancestors. Moreover, the Tribe is expected to protect and assure that all cultural sites of its ancestors are appropriately treated in a respectful manner. Therefore, as noted previously, it is crucial to adequately address the potential for inadvertent discoveries. Further, the Pechanga Tribe believes that if human remains are discovered, State law would apply and the mitigation measures for the permit must account for this. According to the California Public Resources Code. § 5097.981 if Native American human remains are discovered, the Native American Heritage Commission must name a "most likely descendant," who shall be consulted as to the appropriate disposition of the remains. Given the Project's location in Pechanga territory, the Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its right pursuant to California law with regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this Project. PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES The Project is located in a sensitive area of Payomkawichum territory and we believe that the potential to impact subsurface cultural resources is high, given that the Project area has not been previously developed. At this time, the Tribe asks that, at a minimum, the City include the following mitigation measures in its environmental assessment documents: MM 1 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground - disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. MM 2 At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseiuo Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred Is The Dutr Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 6 monitoring program, and to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement between the Applicant/Developer and the Tribe. The Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Native American Tribal monitors during grading excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. MM 3 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre - grading report with the City of Temecula (if required) to document the proposed methodology for grading activity observation which will be determined in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include the requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and-,groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities. MM 4 If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then,make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations conceming the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in MM 2. MM 5 The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. MM 6 All cultural materials, that are collected during the grading monitoring program and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the project site, with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and human remains which will be Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians Post Of Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592 Sacred 1s The Dutv Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP July 3, 2014 Page 7 addressed in the Treatment Agreement required in MM2 shall be tribally curated according to the current professional repository standards by the Pechanga Tribe. The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to the Pechanga Tribe's curation facility which meets the standards set forth in 36 CRF Part 79 for federal repositories. All sacred sites, should they be encountered within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation, if feasible. I MM 7 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding p the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to ' the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be appealable to the Planning Commission and /or City Council. The Tribe reserves the right to fully participate in the environmental review process, as well as to provide further comment on the Project's impacts to cultural resources and potential mitigation for such impacts. Further, the Tribe reserves the right to participate in the regulatory process and provide comment on issues pertaining to the regulatory process and Project approval. The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in protecting the invaluable Pechanga cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact me at 951- 770 -8104 or at ahoover @ pechanga - nsn.gov once you have had a chance to review these comments so that we might address the issues conceming the mitigation language. Thank you. Sincerely, I7 Anna Ho over4n Cultural Analyst Cc Pechanga Office of the General Counsel Brenda Tomaras, Tomaras & Ogas, LLP Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseho Mission Indians Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 93592 Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need March 25, 2014 dD Warr Eric Jones "' 16' ,¢ Project Planner'„ ?� City of Temecula R.ardnfDirer,nr. Post Office Box 9033 Stephen .1. Corona Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 President doh,. Hoagland >r vice ,, Pn�sidem SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY . Rea R. Drake COMFORT SUITES DP Lisa D. Rertnan 41841 MORENO ROAD; PA14 -0058, LOT NO. 5 OF Hilliame.Plnmmer TRACT MAP NO. 5790; APN 921- 070 -011 me,••ste se art [JAMAL FIRAS] Rngcr C. Zie.... Onf.... Dear Mr. Jones: Miurhew G. Stone GrnunJ mmnauur Please be advised that the above- referenced project/property is located within Richard S.W'iliian,,tnt.P.t,. the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD /District). aascnmt Wuntrer The subject project /property fronts an existing 10 -inch diameter water pipeline .Ieffrec D. Armetrnng CFOrtreararer (1305 Pressure Zone) within Moreno Road. N. Craig ElitharP. P.F.. Dit,,t,, f0,,:ru„on. c Water service to the subject projecUproperty exists (under Account No. 01-06 - alaintenance Andreas.. wehcter. IlF.. 27275 -5). Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject Chief Fr,rn,r, to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, Belli E. Garcia as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the District Secretary .Tana.. R. Gilpin property owner. Re,t Rest & Krieger LIP General Coun -1 Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject project/property development relative to water supply shortage contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances), and /or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the projecUproperty may be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, and will require further evaluation and determination by RCWD as part of the development process. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and /or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD. Rancho Cad if., nia Water District 42185 Mlnche.ter Road - Post WE,, Rex 9017 - 'femeeWn. CaI,fornia 92589 903 5 • (951) 2966900 - F_4g (95D 296 6860 x a u.nmchownv,r. Gorr Letter to Eric ,Jones /City of Tetuecula March 25, 2014 As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project - specific demands and /or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an assessment of project- specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will be required for all landscape irrigation. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board and /or the basin plan objectives and the permit conditions issued by the appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at the District office at (95 1) 296 -6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Phillip Dauben Assistant Engineer cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager - Design Warren Back, Engineering Manager - Planning Heath McMahon. Construction Contracts Manager Corry Smith. Engineering Services Supervisor Jamal Firas. Applicant/Representative Ly 13 \PD:Im006\F450 \FFG Raneho CaliPornia Mate, District 42135 Winchr =ter Roed - Poxt Office Box 901, - Temecula. CalifOreia 92589 9015 (901) 29 6-6900 - FAX (951) 2966860 www.raochuwater.com Juan C. Perez `y Interim Plan I nj ng Director t I. IS March 1. 2014 Pages 2 (including this cover) City of Temecula Planning Department FAX: (95 ) 694 -6477 Attention: Eric Jones RE: dE002376 COA Clomfort Suites DP Catty of Temecula Case No. PA14 -0058 County Geologic Report (GEO) No. 2376, submitted for this City of Temecula project (PP14 -0058) was praparec by GSS Engineering, Inc. and is entitled: "Report Preliminary Soil Investigation Proposed Motel bl. ilding 41841 Moreno Road Temecula, California 92590 ", dated January 6, 2014. In addition, GSS pre pared "Response to County Review Comments Letter Proposed Motel Building 41841 Moreno Road T mecula, California 92590 ", dated September 97, 2014. This document is herein incorporated as a par of GE002376. GE002176 concluded t 1 1 he site is not located within a currently designated4lquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No faults, active or potentially active, are known to exist within the site. - a 2. 1 he probability . of surface rupture at the site is considered very low. 3. I he potential of soil liquefaction at the site is considered very low owing to the absence of near surface groundwater. 4. 1 he hydro - consolidation potential of the onsite soil is considered low. GE0021,76 recommended: 1. i Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of asphalt, concrete slab, vegetation such s brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees;.roots of trees and otherwise deleterious natural material f om the areas to be graded.. 2. 1 Existing paving and.concrete slabs should be removed from the site. 3. All of the existing onsite fill and loose or disturbed surface natural soils within the proposed construction areas be removed to underlying competent natural soil and replaced with properly compacted fill for slab and pavement support. CEO No. 2376 satisfies the requirement for a geologic /geotech mica I study: for Planning /CEQA purposes. CEO No. 2376 is hereby accepted for Planning purposes. Engineering and other Uniform Buildinng Code parameters were not included as apart of this review or approval: This approval is not intende and should not be misconstrued as approval for grading permit. Engineering and other building code parameters should be reviewed and additional comments and /or conditions may be Imposed by the City upon application for grading and /or building permits:' 'side Office •:4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Desert Office i 77588 El Dune Court Box 1409, Riverside, C8VOmle 92502 -1409 Palm Desert, Californla' 92211 (951) 955 -3200 • Fox (951) 955 -1811 (760) 863 -8277 • Fax (760)863.7555 From 9519551811 Page_ V2 Date: 11/25/2014 12001 PM R1; V.ER.51DE COUNTY PLANNING" DEPIAR�TME'NT Juan C. Perez `y Interim Plan I nj ng Director t I. IS March 1. 2014 Pages 2 (including this cover) City of Temecula Planning Department FAX: (95 ) 694 -6477 Attention: Eric Jones RE: dE002376 COA Clomfort Suites DP Catty of Temecula Case No. PA14 -0058 County Geologic Report (GEO) No. 2376, submitted for this City of Temecula project (PP14 -0058) was praparec by GSS Engineering, Inc. and is entitled: "Report Preliminary Soil Investigation Proposed Motel bl. ilding 41841 Moreno Road Temecula, California 92590 ", dated January 6, 2014. In addition, GSS pre pared "Response to County Review Comments Letter Proposed Motel Building 41841 Moreno Road T mecula, California 92590 ", dated September 97, 2014. This document is herein incorporated as a par of GE002376. GE002176 concluded t 1 1 he site is not located within a currently designated4lquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No faults, active or potentially active, are known to exist within the site. - a 2. 1 he probability . of surface rupture at the site is considered very low. 3. I he potential of soil liquefaction at the site is considered very low owing to the absence of near surface groundwater. 4. 1 he hydro - consolidation potential of the onsite soil is considered low. GE0021,76 recommended: 1. i Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of asphalt, concrete slab, vegetation such s brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees;.roots of trees and otherwise deleterious natural material f om the areas to be graded.. 2. 1 Existing paving and.concrete slabs should be removed from the site. 3. All of the existing onsite fill and loose or disturbed surface natural soils within the proposed construction areas be removed to underlying competent natural soil and replaced with properly compacted fill for slab and pavement support. CEO No. 2376 satisfies the requirement for a geologic /geotech mica I study: for Planning /CEQA purposes. CEO No. 2376 is hereby accepted for Planning purposes. Engineering and other Uniform Buildinng Code parameters were not included as apart of this review or approval: This approval is not intende and should not be misconstrued as approval for grading permit. Engineering and other building code parameters should be reviewed and additional comments and /or conditions may be Imposed by the City upon application for grading and /or building permits:' 'side Office •:4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Desert Office i 77588 El Dune Court Box 1409, Riverside, C8VOmle 92502 -1409 Palm Desert, Californla' 92211 (951) 955 -3200 • Fox (951) 955 -1811 (760) 863 -8277 • Fax (760)863.7555 L L From 9519551811 Page M Date. 110512014 120.01 PM i Than i you for the opportunity to review this case for the City of Temecula. Please call me at (95 ) 955 -6863 if you have any questions, S ncerely, R VERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT._ Juan C. Perez, Interim Planning director I L Jones, CEO No. 2283 ief i5ingineering Geologist, TLMA- Planning c : GSS Engineering, Inc. Fax: (562)698 =5771 Temecula File: PA14 -0058 GEO02376 R Goology%Temewla ROVIOWTAGEO 02376 Approval for PA14.0058.dOCX . i NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA14 -0058 Applicant: Firas Jamal Proposal: A Development Plan to construct a three -story 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel within the Old Town Specific Plan area totaling 31,263 square feet. The hotel will be located at 41841 Moreno Road. Amenities will include an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business center Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects) Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: January 7, 2015 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. ys \\ rs���ao Project Site O ` 0 125 250 500 .'t1 Feet The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.ora — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400. ITEM 6 STAFF REPORT — PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: James Atkins. Case Planner PROJECT Planning Application Nos. PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909, a Home SUMMARY: Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations. No further analysis is required. PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Scott Hansen, KB Home General Plan SP -11, Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: LM — Low Medium Density Residential Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant North: Single - Family Residential — across Murrieta Hot Springs Road South: Single - Family Residential — (VL) Very Low Density East: Single - Family Residential — (LM) Low Medium Density West: Single - Family Residential — (LM) Low Medium Density 1 BACKGROUND SUMMARY The property entitled Roripaugh Ranch received approval for a Zone Change to Specific Plan (SP -11), on November 26, 2002. The community is proposed to comprise 2,015 single - family lots on 804.7 gross acres, resulting in an overall density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The subdivision is designed and designated as a Low Medium Density community (LM) with amenities that include 24.8 acres for two public park sites, 9.1 acres for two private recreation centers and a private mini -park. This is KB Home's final section in this particular area of Roripaugh Ranch to be developed as the tracts on both the east and west are approaching build out. On September 23, 2014, the applicant submitted Planning Application PA14 -0219, a Home Product Review application for 99 single - family residential units. The application will allow KB Home to select and update specific product types for the community. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan identifies 14 specific architectural styles for product type that may be utilized within the community: American Farmhouse, California Ranch, Classic Revival, Colonial, Contemporary Southwest, Craftsman, East Coast Traditional, French Cottage, Italianate, Mediterranean, Mission, Monterey, Prairie Style, and Spanish Revival. ANALYSIS Architecture KB Home has selected Classic Revival, Monterey, Prairie Style, and Spanish Revival for this submittal which includes four (4) distinct plans comprised of one (1) single -story, and three (3) two -story plans. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requires single -story volumes and architecture forward concepts in at least 50% of the homes in this planning area. Each elevation provides distinct architectural treatment and articulation. Visual interest is achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials emphasize the various architectural styles. The proposed plans include well defined front entries with the use of arched entries, extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry. Garage and front doors are unique to the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof pitches provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan encourages the use of stucco as the primary wall material with light earth tone colors on primary wall surfaces and contrasting trim colors. The project includes twelve different combinations of building materials and colors for the four elevation styles. The color variation, stucco, and stone materials serve to break up the massing of the two -story units as required by the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The variation of material and colors helps individualize each home and creates character in the neighborhood. Each proposed architectural style has three distinct color schemes that customize the style. The materials include a variety of roof types, stucco and trim colors, and decorative features. The intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan has been achieved by ensuring a continuity of colors, materials and textures throughout the entire development. The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the four proposed styles is therefore distinct through the use of material treatment, massing and geometries, and color palates on all elevations of each product. The features which attempt to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: 4 • Spanish Revival: Stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, combination of gable and hipped roofs, clay pipe accents, exposed rafter tails and wood fascia, arched entrances, arched and rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, decorative Spanish tiles at front porches and entries, decorative wrought iron, and decorative foam trim elements. • Prairie: stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, hipped roofs, wood fascia, decorative multi -pane windows, and decorative foam trim elements. • Classic Revival: stucco finish, flat tile roof, 6:12 to 8:12 roof pitch, combination of gable and hipped roofs, wood fascia, decorative vents and trim under gable roofs, decorative multi -pane windows and shutters, decorative columns at porches, and decorative foam trim elements. • Monterey: stucco finish, concrete flat 'S' roof, 5:12 roof pitch, wood fascia, second -story cantilevered balcony with decorative wood posts and railing, rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters, and decorative foam trim elements. Product Placement and Enhancement In addition to the varied architectural styles, the proposed product placement provides a varied and visually interesting street scene which has been achieved through creative product placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The products have been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area have been designed and conditioned to incorporate architectural enhancements which include pop outs, shutters, and additional roof elements. The lots that require additional enhancements are identified on the plotting plan. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans. Minor Exception The plotting and grading of Map TR 29661 -1 has created physical conditions and single lot geometry on one lot in ninety -nine. Lot 41 is unique in that the width creates a situation where standard home products do not fit within the defined building cornerside setbacks prescribed within the development standards of the Specific Plan. As a result, any home builder offering product on the remaining 98 lots, could not utilize their proposed product for this single lot. This burden creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships due to the strict application of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. The Specific Plan requires cornerside setbacks of 15 feet. As plotted, home products with widths of 40 feet and less only, would fit on this single lot when applying the prescribed setbacks. On the remaining 98 lots of this map, home products of 45 feet and 50 feet wide are proposed. In order to continue the use of the proposed home product for this map, a reduction of 2 feet to the cornerside setback is proposed. This reduction results in a 13 percent difference, and is within the 15 percent reduction allowed by the Development Code. This resulting width meets the intent of Development Standards with respect to cornerside setbacks, visibility triangles, and lines of site. X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.dou 3 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on December 26, 2014 and mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and is exempt from further environmental review. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. As conditioned, the proposed single - family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low- Medium Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned and is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. As conditioned, the overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed and has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Minor Exception (Code Section 17.03.060D) There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property. The existing map and physical conditions as a result of grading and plotting TR 29661 -1 allow for the builder's home product to fit on 98 of 99 lots. Lot 41 is a unique exception which creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships due to the strict application of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. A reduction of the cornerside setback by 13 percent is within the allowable 15 percent reduction of the Development Code and meets the intent of X:\2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.docx 4 Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and lines of site. The minor exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity. Permitting this minor exception will not grant special privileges to the builder as this condition is unique to one lot and is intended to meet the intent of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. The result of permitting this minor exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons as the reduction to the setback meets the intent of Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and lines of site. The project has been reviewed and has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone. As conditioned, the permitted use of single- family homes, including the site, building, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of the surrounding properties and is permitted use within this zone and will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS Aerial Map Plan Reductions Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.dou 5 AERIAL MAP City of Temecula �a _7 -*~ z. u 4..«.. -.. ......r... .•..ire.+........ —..- .ar- sv.wr.. 11.v:f of rc... Project Site on Z Z 7 PA 14 -02 19 ° 8 m 3 z z o f a C poiNr oR " a s • se as � 3 . - �••�_. ••+•••••..r� •ruro�ewreMV(t�asrf.+.....r.... eat BRE V i.l: is F � POLO CREEK DR . `a i i Dt, or no responsibility nforma The airy of Te „al.epresented ap NORTH n this '�mrrmauon orribinea on hma map Data and infor Data ondorap on day map subtect ho update an a mumbo eon. The GeoerepMClnformetbn system and Geographic Information other sources should be yuered for Me most current inrormebon. ° b y .- w fe Of U ° z er 9� I t !J System: r.I. r a zsa sao eat The Mu M dewed from e data Temecula y Me Riverdale County as m. memep mt as aete oroaucen bytbegiment Department andMFambase Agency Rlyfor e imnapMeOOnnes Lena Management em Neenry Dt, or no responsibility nforma The airy of Te „al.epresented ap NORTH n this '�mrrmauon orribinea on hma map Data and infor Data ondorap on day map subtect ho update an a mumbo eon. The GeoerepMClnformetbn system and Geographic Information other sources should be yuered for Me most current inrormebon. The map is not for report or mule. Geographic nformatior System: PLAN REDUCTIONS «.12P ma rtrnc,ul snxcvon ra�Y n YFL-51(liI �ooc 5 13 PIYIF mCM ( \IYLItkTF S TIIF IMILALI wmrl5xu � 5 Matt • .• •, � � _� OKOMIIVE CIAY nE 146 SNCCDOV[II iMY1PO1 S. >�<'•' �� ' ���� STUCOOIIY611 IlwfEl SBCIY51IAl fW.50E DUOY � 1% � 7 RON p9@R�M STSCOOVk2 F6\Y 1LY PRAIRIE ELEVATION SPANISH REVIVAL ELEVATION m�nere nwr WaoocoEUei �,a A mcmavn aYr n1Y wmrl5xu � �I oa�oumh (LACE) mccvova mu1 nr seciEOrinE cnancP moe ;�� RORIPAl1GH RANCH TO ORDER n 11d !WII -1 cm ar nY1LVlA «I_wor ma IT FlCAL) V' �,a A mcmavn aYr n1Y '11 oa�oumh CLASSIC REVIVAL ELEVATION First Floor Plan RORIPAUGH RANCH n. TRAU7 NO 2n 1 -2 ORDER ._..,...w C" I IY! III flNIECULA BEDROOM BED ROOM n MASTER m.. i BEDROOM O O i a -i GREAT ROOM nit� GARAGE FLEX i KITCHEN First Floor Plan RORIPAUGH RANCH n. TRAU7 NO 2n 1 -2 ORDER ._..,...w C" I IY! III flNIECULA LEFT ELEVATION w r 0 e0 FRONT FLFVATK)N RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SPANISH REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH s TO ORDER • �wnrw wig �. l III Uf lEllFl l'LA LEFT ELEVATION H----- -- -�-------- -- --- -- - - --- RIGHT ELEVATION RORIPAUGH RANCH nxT w ww.� cm' ix ir.�ci2'u FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION �LIC� LAC RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PRAIRIE RORIPAUGH RANCH T OORDER anofineanw rn (l W).: l -i .. ..,., LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT Q.EVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVA71M PRAIRM RORIPAUGH RANCH _ TO ORDER arc oe �enn.A LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL Ma[� u �' .—' RORIPAUGH RANCH T"O OROER '" rnv iwy� E.wn.�n LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION RORIPALIGH RANCH 111 V'f � AYI -1 unY1l1 ll I LLA REAR ELEVATION ttl o FFIE RER.\ SFIE.0 m ��OOE >titTQl WN �OF 5:1: tOOi FIICN f>•YIICAL) fCall (LACEI SI FOAM O AM AM RM $ECF%MAL CNRACf OWR SPANISH REVIVAL ELEVATION PRAIRIE ELEVATION liwu�t Yur tn, VUOD FASCIA IM I 1ltA.lU IWEN MCI SFI wUVEP FOAM Rd SCLTIWI. (iAEA(I f1f10• nm Win RORIPAUCH RANCH TO ORDER crry of tFr�anw nwcT na 3fEN -1 Cpi Ew T RE +AACi I lu a m'n osl>turrvE S.nrtlEas pR \YAtI\'F tIAY TII f 1lFS 79 11 71p ]III 1I [i �iE1 ■1t CLASSIC REVIVAL ELEVATION cllau Fncll 111EW1M VFrT MfCWi1VF LRIT1FtS r lII FOR Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan 1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH TMGTNO.2 1 -2 TO ORDER ...�.,s UTl OF TE11H'ULA 1 KITCHEN _ n � _ aw wm BEDRTER OOM r - r- �+ J GARAGE .9 DEN ' co a BEDROOM 2 { F wnw i i `- LOFT BEDROOM S � I' .wa. _u i i i i i Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan 1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH TMGTNO.2 1 -2 TO ORDER ...�.,s UTl OF TE11H'ULA ROOM KITCHEN aw HOBBY _^ r - r- �+ J GARAGE .9 DEN k wnw i i Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan 1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH TMGTNO.2 1 -2 TO ORDER ...�.,s UTl OF TE11H'ULA M ae LEFT ELEVATION 0 vo RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATR)% W = no . w w w w RORIPAUGH RANCH mulww -i 1�rr nr reieiva REAR ELEVATION ,// A .: n. .. w ma w r LEFT ELEVATION 0 vo RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATR)% W = no . w w w w RORIPAUGH RANCH mulww -i 1�rr nr reieiva REAR ELEVATION .0 w w w LEFT ELEVATION 0 vo RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATR)% W = no . w w w w RORIPAUGH RANCH mulww -i 1�rr nr reieiva REAR ELEVATION .0 w w LEFT ELEVATION 0 vo RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATR)% W = no . w w w w RORIPAUGH RANCH mulww -i 1�rr nr reieiva REAR ELEVATION LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION FRONT ELEVATION A vp i" '00 mom LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION FRONT ELEVATION A i" 7.1 mom '11111 a, a 1321 U on ■ i N1 � iii au ��' a� is iu 1/r AMIN 1r. Nam LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT FLFVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION RFAR FLEV'ATIOK SPANISH REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH a'm Ir T[Ltccu a, a 1321 U �- N11 al- ,an iii au ��' a� is iu AMIN 121 n - - 1u ea is a1E �.. idJ J6a Y0 1l11 ME m SEE N: :M ..� III RIGHT FLFVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION RFAR FLEV'ATIOK SPANISH REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH a'm Ir T[Ltccu MW LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PRAIRIE RORIPAUGH RANCH mA�� nai �ssei -� TO ORDER j MY 1w 1 LWULA `� • LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION PRAIRIE RORIPAUGH RANCH • TO ORC)ER n.l t �u :.e.i -1 _ 4 11\ IM ITlll LA ■ ■ LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER n (TNO._ l I a cm' � Texccuu Abbe., LEFT ELEVATION - ----- - ---= - - - -- - ----------------- FRONT I I I V A TION AJAW � qlqw RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH TO SEEL OR04ER c'm (;nWIILA 412 W m (n m, STLLLOV esHU n RK� Wl�d 9 114 4AK� IN "2 FRA1F m (MICFFW,� FYlM:911AS�LLf Slik[.D V<RNI (FACp ORCOIIAnVE Tuv rur, nFFa snrcoovsR FOAM TRIP SFANMH REVIVAL ELEVATION PRAIRIE ELEVATION kQ ROaf m® mrru� corsnFn stAr fOR1Hn TT�E R�OOY FASOA mr) SFIRLIIFR'®1 SFIKYUOVFA FOAM 1RO1 Slf'iRNAI. IiARA(E PICM RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER myarFasavu T (7w) 3 l I 111M3F1£ S' TIl2 wvm Fws[u (Ttt.l SfINTT1 f1VFR ii1W TRIM fAY�ORAiR'F WRq M'M i[M ELFAIWT 9iRT V f1A15H )uixi MONTEREY ELEVATION rs LL) T ovFR RN . ,4vD AT m Second Floor Plan First FIWT Plan RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER �° TRACT NU. �1 -z UT OFTEMECULA KITCHEN I !I I CP GREAT I ROOM I HOBBY r..r i FLEX GARAGE DEN Second Floor Plan First FIWT Plan RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER �° TRACT NU. �1 -z UT OFTEMECULA e LEFT ELEVATION i FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION SPANISH REVIVAL RORIPAUUH RANCH IM1 NI }bl -1 TO ORDER 1 of T[Alfl Ll� ••.• •• *L is T M 'I Ll ....... LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION a RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION SPANISH REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH TD ORDER ••+' —•_'! I1LN1413YM1 -1 w u.n l'T'Oi TilEl'LL. Q — ■ LEFT ELEVATION m mow— Form-1 I WAN FRONT ELEVATN)N RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION- PRAIRIE RORIPALGH RANCH TO ORDER rle �Irwl vel -I �. ll1111111. WlI It viturtai .. ii G� 2i3OL1D 01 r�w�: m imu 31NIVMd WAIVA]I I 4V38 NOIIIONOJ 101 (ITAVH43 NOIIVA313 ]]FJIN w min NOLLVA313 7NOI13 NOI1V A313 1331 I ■ ■ LEFT ELEVATION I b J ..� RL ;. FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT FLF%, \TII ?N REAR ELEVATION MONTEREY C RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER "" rwuT�u' .vml.l ... UT\ Vi Ii vr, a I LEFT ELEVATION I Kj IA ■ r �` -' •f Wlp� FRONT ELEVATION Hoy RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION MONTEREY • C !' "rim RORIPAUGH RANCH TO ORDER .•..�;_ axe. i u. wi -i �. t IT ali TE•Et t'L\ s 12 MCI ,r REAL s lcco 0v Fl N MM IIH'.FSSFI wwonw SFL'iNW/J �aDl ci2laxs Fnal (fYF1[M I SRI ®FREII /1w1E1 snccoOVFl FOAM lEY Of('glAl1VE SIRTIFl3 SFlT1C1#AL fi4MSE IXIMI MONTEREY ELEVATION cunatere s n1E �Rm FAYIA fD'F) Sn1CCDOVFI fOAY IEM SnAIU FPOII I�EI s� crrxweiESUr f � s.i�off wmR FAw'u Inr 1 i = Kul ' _ anmsis QM Sn %CO FM91 _ _ d —j.� -. f�1RVF IIMFI _ a- :tit-. ' � YHIf 7A serr1o11AL �. - uoal PRAIRIE ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL ff EVATION x �" RORIPAUGH RANCH '? °a - TO.ORDER) " «° FwTro lRil�l CII l 1FM VLA Y-i _ RORIPAUGH RANCH TRAC'NO, -Y I -2 Cl I I OF TENECULA FLEX DEN Vie^ GREAT ROOM w.n R A n KITCHEN eiV n GARAGE -• R BEDROOM si HOBBY � 5 � 0 _ RORIPAUGH RANCH TRAC'NO, -Y I -2 Cl I I OF TENECULA Smond Fluor Plan HUM RORIPAUGH RANCH _.,... TO ORDER rRAIA No.2 a 1 -2 Cl IY OF TE.MECULA �rxmr LOFT 1, �- i' MASTER ----------- BEDROOM _____ � e�w U �1 BEDROOM — ' I 2 BEDROOM < BEDROOM 3 I R 'F-Ix O O fi__ _ J_ i Smond Fluor Plan HUM RORIPAUGH RANCH _.,... TO ORDER rRAIA No.2 a 1 -2 Cl IY OF TE.MECULA L I LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION A _... _�.---- --- ---- �--- ----------------- . - -- - -------� -- -- RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION PRAIRIE lfm _ RORIPAUGN RAN(Ti b Tu l vt !Y1bL TO ORDF -R OIY IN RLIIILY `- n w LEFT ELEVATION A w FRONT ELEVATION T - -�I RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION PRAIRIE RORIPAUGH RANCH au TIIN T MI !tll -1 TO ORDER I ll1Y.M+1}YLL'lU � N LEFF ELEVATION - - - - ------ - - - - -- RIGHT ELEVATION RORIPAUGH RANCH <m���s naafifi Iu 9-t v" . REAR ELEVATION LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATON a am ® ■ m ME RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL RORIPAUGH RANCH *� TO ORDER "' " "'t"° C- m' iw reHEa'i: LA e LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION f f -7 ■ r ' W r m y. RIGHT ELEVATION RE AR EI1 . %Tlo\ %IONTEREY M ! 'fl um ,,.,"" ... RORIPAUGH RANCH _. TO ORDER T1111 t 4A .W 1 -1 lrtY Iw RVlI l U B Eno LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION MONTEREY RORIPAUGH RANCH M� TO ORDER ",•, - „”- mu-rw wci -� ,.. - <'ffY PC RESOLUTION PC RESOLUTION NO. 15- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0219 AND PA14 -2909, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW KB HOME TO CONSTRUCT 99 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN RORIPAUGH RANCH AND A MINOR EXCEPTION FOR THE SIDE -YARD SETBACK ON LOT 41 TO REDUCE THE CORNERSIDE SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 13 FEET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE SITE IS LOCATED IN RORIPAUGH RANCH ON TR 29661 -1 (PLANNING AREA 2) AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (APNS: 957 - 710 -001 — 012; 957 - 711 -001 — 044; 957 - 712 -001 — 014; 957 - 713 -001 — 013; 957 - 720 -001 — 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; AND 957 -723- 001) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On September 23, 2014 the applicant filed Planning Application No. PA14 -0219, a Home Product Review Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on January 7, 2015, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA14 -0219 subject to, and based upon, the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Code (Section 17.05.010.F). A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; As conditioned, proposed single- family homes are permitted in the land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low - Medium Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned and is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. The project is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; As conditioned, the overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. Minor Exception (Code Section 17.03.060D) C. There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property; The existing map and physical conditions as a result of grading and plotting TR 29661 -1 allow for the builder's home product to fit on 98 of 99 lots. Lot 41 is a unique exception which creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships due to the strict application of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. A reduction of the cornerside setback by 13 percent is within the allowable 15 percent reduction of the Development Code and meets the intent of Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and lines of site. D. The minor exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity; Permitting this minor exception will not grant special privileges to the builder as this condition is unique to one lot and is intended to meet the intent of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. The result of permitting this minor exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other persons as the reduction to the setback meets the intent of Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and lines of site. The project has been reviewed and has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. E. The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone; As conditioned, the permitted use of single- family homes, including the site, building, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of the surrounding properties and is permitted use within this zone and will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Modification Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. Therefore the proposed project has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review; Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909, a Home Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, (APN: 957 - 340 -048) subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 7th day of January, 2015. Stanley Harter, Chairman ATTEST: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of January, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Armando G. Villa, AICP Secretary EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909 Project Description: A Home Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 957 - 710 -001 — 012; 957 - 711 -001 — 044; 957 - 712 -001 — 014; 957- 713 -001 — 013; 957 - 720 -001 — 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; and 957- 723 -001 MSHCP Category: Single - Family Residential (less than 8 du /ac) DIF Category: Residential - Detached TUMF Category: Single - Family Residential Quimby Category: Single - Family with Attached Garage Approval Date: January 7, 2015 Expiration Date: January 7, 2017 PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements PL -1. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. PL -2. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. PL -3. Site Plan and Elevations. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department. PL -4. Enhanced Elevations. All enhanced elevation locations identified on the Product Placement Plan shall also be identified on the Precise Grading Plans ( "E ") and Building Construction Plans. PL -5. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. PL -6. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3 one -year extensions of time, one year at a time. PL -7. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. PL -8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. PL -9. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. PL -10. Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations dated September 23, 2014, on file with the Planning Division, unless superseded by these Conditions of Approval. PL -11. Si na e. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) PL -12. Final Map Recordation. The Final Maps for 29661 -1 shall be recorded. PL -13. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. PL -14. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -15. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." PL -16. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. PL -17. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. PL -18. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. PL -19. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas). PL -20. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. PL -21. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit PL -22. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. PL -23. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. PL -24. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of the certificate occupancy permit. PL -25. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. PL -26. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. PL -27. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements PW -1. Tract Map Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 (PA01 -0253) as approved on November 26, 2002 and all its amendments. PW -2. Specific Plan Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94 -0075) as approved on November 26, 2002 and all its amendments. PW -3. Development Agreement. The Applicant shall comply with the Development Agreement, and all its amendments, between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC dated December 17, 2002. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit PW -4. Building Pad. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -5. Im�act Fees. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated December 17, 2002. PW -6. TUMF Fees. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08 BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Conditions B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi - family residential projects or a recorded final map for single - family residential projects. B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. PW -2. Specific Plan Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94 -0075) as approved on November 26, 2002 and all its amendments. PW -3. Development Agreement. The Applicant shall comply with the Development Agreement, and all its amendments, between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC dated December 17, 2002. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit PW -4. Building Pad. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. PW -5. Impact Fees. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated December 17, 2002. PW -6. TUMF Fees. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08 BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Conditions B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi- family residential projects or a recorded final map for single- family residential projects. B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. B -9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. B -11. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits B -12. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: Case No: PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909 Applicant: Scott Hansen Proposal: A Home Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side - yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) Case Planner: James Atkins, (951) 240 -4206 Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers Date of Hearing: January 7, 2014 Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m. �rire rlrr �w _ rlw�r� Ij a. 0. �� p 111... 11 �► _ .. ►� ..� • C C: � tai � //I /111 ►� SKYUNE The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400. X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 -0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission\PC -NOPH PA14- 0219.docx