HomeMy WebLinkAbout010715 PC AgendaIn compliance, with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please
contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 7, 2015 — 6:00 PM
Next in Order:
Resolution: 15 -01
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute: Commissioner Harter
Roll Call: Guerriero, Harter, Kight, Telesio and Turley -Trejo
PRESENTATIONS /PROCLAMATIONS
1 Presentation by Planning Commission to Earlene Bundy
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes each. If
you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon
colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission
Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission
Secretary prior to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three - minute time
limit for individual speakers.
Z19111191:111111 119111111
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Action Minutes of November 5, 2014
Director's Hearing Summary Report
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and File
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Elect 2015 Chairperson and Vice Chairperson
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Planning Application No. PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to construct a three - story. 54
room Comfort Suites Hotel totaling 31,270 feet, within the Old Town Specific Plan area,
including an indoor swimming pool, fitness room and business center, located at 41841
Moreno Road, Eric Jones
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0058, A
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY 54 ROOM
COMFORT SUITES HOTEL TOTALING 31,263 SQUARE FEET. WITHIN THE
OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA, INCLUDING AN INDOOR SWIMMING
POOL, FITNESS ROOM, AND BUSINESS CENTER, AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT (CEQA), LOCATED AT 41841 MORENO ROAD (APN 921 -070-
011)
Planning Application Nos. PA14 -0219, a Home Product Review for KB Homes that
includes four floor plans with four elevation styles and three color schemes per style
and PA14 -2909, a Minor Exception for the side yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the
corner side setback from 15 feet to 13 feet, located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1
(Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of
Murrieta Hot Springs Road, James Atkins
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0219 AND
PA14 -2909, A HOME PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW KB
HOME TO CONSTRUCT 99 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN
RORIPAUGH RANCH AND A MINOR EXCEPTION FOR THE SIDE -YARD
SETBACK ON LOT 41 TO REDUCE THE CORNERSIDE SETBACK FROM 15
FEET TO 13 FEET AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE SITE IS
LOCATED IN RORIPAUGH RANCH ON TR 29661 -1 (PLANNING AREA 2)
AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD
AND SOUTH OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (APNS: 957- 710 -001 —
012; 957- 711 -001 — 044; 957- 712 -001 — 014; 957 - 713 -001 — 013; 957 - 720 -001
— 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; AND 957- 723 -001)
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S)
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, January 21, 2015, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic
Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the agenda
packet may also be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orc — and will be available for public viewing at the
respective meeting.
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the
agenda, will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula,
8:00 AM — 5:00 PM). In addition, such material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.orc — and will be
available for public viewing at the respective meeting.
If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula
Civic Center, (951) 694 -6400.
ITEM 1
V •;.
9
ITEM 2
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please
contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694 -6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II].
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
NOVEMBER 5, 2014 — 6:00 PM
Next in Order:
Resolution: 14 -24
CALL TO ORDER:
Flag Salute: Commissioner Guerriero
Roll Call: Guerriero, Harter, Kight, Telesio and Turley -Trejo
Staff Attendees: Villa, Garcia, Klima, Fisk and Jones
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members
of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 CONTINUED FROM OCTOBER 15, 2014: Approve the Action Minutes of
October 1, 2014 APPROVED 3- 0 -0 -2; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TURLEY- TREJO; AYE VOTES
FROM COMMISSIONERS HARTER, KIGHT AND TURLEY- TREJO;
GUERRIERO, TELESIO ABSTAINED
1.2 Approve the Action Minutes of October 15, 2014 APPROVED 4 -0 -0 -1 (FOR
ITEM 3); MOTION BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO, SECOND BY
COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS
GUERRIERO, HARTER, TELESIO, TURLEY- TREJO; KIGHT ABSTAINED.
APPROVED 3 -0 -0 -2 (FOR ITEMS 4 AND 5) MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
GUERRIERO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO; AYE VOTES FROM
COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, TELESIO AND TURLEY- TREJO; HARTER,
KIGHT ABSTAINED
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public
hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the
project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in
written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public
hearing.
Any person dissatisfied with any decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal
of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after
service of written notice of the decision, must be filed on the appropriate Planning
Department application and must be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee.
Planning Application No. PA14 -0101 a Minor Conditional Use Permit to allow a hookah
and cigar lounge to operate within an existing shopping center, located at 27515
Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 3- 1 -0 -1; MOTION BY COMMISSIONER
TELESIO, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GUERRIERO; AYE VOTES FROM
COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, KIGHT AND TELESIO; TURLEY -TREJO VOTED
NO, HARTER ABSTAINED
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 14 -24
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA 14 -0101, A
MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A HOOKAH AND CIGAR
LOUNGE WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER LOCATED AT 27515
JEFFERSON AVENUE AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 909 -240-
026)
3 Planning Application No. PA14 -0141, a Minor Modification to allow a facade
improvement to an existing two -story office building, located on the east side of
Jefferson Avenue. approximately 500 feet north of the Jefferson Avenue and Via
Montezuma intersection at 27708 Jefferson Avenue, Eric Jones APPROVED 5 -0;
MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HARTER, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TELESIO;
AYE VOTES FROM COMMISSIONERS GUERRIERO, HARTER, KIGHT, TELESIO
AND TURLEY -TREJO
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO. 14 -25
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0141, A
MINOR MODIFICATION APPLICATION TO ALLOW A FACADE
IMPROVEMENT TO AN EXISTING TWO -STORY OFFICE BUILDING
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF JEFFERSON AVENUE,
APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET NORTH OF THE JEFFERSON AVENUE AND
VIA MONTEZUMA INTERSECTION AT 27708 JEFFERSON AVENUE, AND
MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APNS 921 - 400 -033, 921 - 400 -037)
REPORTS FROM COMMISSIONERS
REPORTS FROM COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE(S)
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Wednesday, December 3, 2014, 6:00 PM City Council Chambers, 41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
Stanley Harter
Chairman
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Director of Community Development
ITEM 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 7, 2015
SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report
Planning Director's Agenda items for October and December, 2014
October 23, 2014 PA14 -0126 A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula Nick Tomlison APPROVED
CrossFit to operate a specialized fitness
gymnasium within an existing vacant 6,960
square foot office /industrial suite, located at
43475 Business Park Drive
December 11, 2014 PA14 -0191 A Conditional Use Permit for Forza One Dana APPROVED
Performance Volleyball to utilize 39,835 Burkholder
square feet of an existing building for indoor
Attachment:
Action Agendas
ACTION AGENDAS
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 23, 2014 1:30 P.M.
TEMECULA CITY HALL
Great Oak Conference Room
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Director of
Community Development on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited
to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director about an item not listed on
the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Director.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No. 1
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description
Location:
Environmental Action
Project Planner:
ACTION:
1:30 p.m.
PA14 -0126
Conditional Use Permit
Temecula CrossFit
Nick Thomlison
A Conditional Use Permit to allow Temecula CrossFit to operate a
specialized fitness gymnasium within an existing vacant 6,960 square
foot office /industrial suite
43474 Business Park Drive
Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities
James Atkins
APPROVED
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center
(41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Director's Hearing. At that time, the agenda packet may also be
accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting.
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public
viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM —5:00 PM). In addition, such
material may be accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be available for public viewing at the respective
meeting.
If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic
Center, (951) 694 -6400.
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 11, 2014 1:30 P.M.
TEMECULA CITY HALL
Great Oak Conference Room
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Director of
Community Development on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited
to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Director about an item not listed on
the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Director.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No. 1
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
Environmental Action:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
1:30 p.m.
PA14 -0191
Conditional Use Permit
Forza One Performance Volleyball
Dana Burkholder
A Conditional Use Permit to utilize 39,835 square feet of an existing
building for indoor volleyball Mondaythrough Friday from 4:00 p.m. to
12:00 a.m., and Saturday and Sunday from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m.
27711 Diaz Road
Section 15301, Class 1 Existing Facilities
James Atkins
APPROVED
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for public viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center
(41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 PM the Friday before the Director's Hearing. At that lime, the agenda packet may also be
accessed on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.oro — and will be available for public viewing at the respective meeting.
Supplemental material received after the posting of the Agenda
Any supplemental material distributed regarding any item on the agenda, after the posting of the agenda, will be available for public
viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula, 8:00 AM -5:00 PM). m addition, such
material may be accessed on the City's websile — www.citvoftemecula.oro — and will be available for public viewing at the respective
meeting.
If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda for this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at the Temecula Civic
Center, (951) 694 -6400.
ITEM 4
ELECT 2015 CHAIR AND
VICE CHAIR
ITEM 5
STAFF REPORT— PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2015
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
PREPARED BY: Eric Jones. Case Planner
PROJECT Planning Application Number PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to
SUMMARY: construct a three - story, 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel totaling
31,263 square feet, within the Old Town Specific Plan area,
including an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business
center, located at 41841 Moreno Road
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of
Approval
CEQA: Categorically Exempt
Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill Development Projects
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Firas Jamal
General Plan Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)
Designation:
Zoning Designation: Specific Plan No. 5 (Old Town)
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation
Lot Area:
North: Moreno Road, Existing Restaurant/Specific Plan Implementation
(SPI)
South: Existing Parking Lot, Commercial Structure /Specific Plan
Implementation (SPI)
East: Existing Hotel, Specific Plan Implementation (SPI)
West: Existing Commercial Structure /Specific Plan Implementation
Existing /Proposed Min /Max Allowable or Required
0.78 Acres 0.7 Acres
Total Floor Area /Ratio: 0.91 N/A
Landscape Area /Coverage: 3,102 Square Feet N/A
Parking Required /Provided: 54 Parking Spaces 54 Parking Spaces
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
On March 18, 2014, Firas Jamal submitted Planning Application PA14 -0058, a Development
Plan application to allow for the construction of a three -story 31,263 square foot hotel at 41841
Moreno Road within the Old Town Specific Plan. Hotels are permitted uses in the R /LMU
district upon the approval of a Development Plan. The application was reviewed by the Old
Town Local Review Board on September 8, 2014. The Board expressed support for the project
and provided no objections or design revisions.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the
applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project is located in the R /LMU district, 250 feet east of the corner of Old Town Front Street
and Moreno Road. The building is designed to provide active street frontage along Moreno
Road. The main entrance to the hotel is located on the west elevation. Pedestrians along
Moreno Road will reach this entrance via a walkway along the western elevation. A small tower
element has been located at the start of this walkway at the public right -of -way. This will create
a focal point to guide pedestrians to the main entrance. A series of covered patios are also
located along Moreno Road. The westernmost patio will contain a seating area for guests using
the continental breakfast facility. The middle patio will provide outdoor space for the indoor
swimming pool. The easternmost patio will provide access for three suites and the exercise
room.
Vehicular access to the hotel will be off Moreno Road on the west side of the project site. This
access point will guide vehicles to the parking lot located at the rear of the structure. Trash
service for the building will also be provided from this vehicular connection. The parking lot will
feature decorative pavers and landscaping throughout and will be substantially screened from
the street mostly by the hotel. The applicant has proposed 54 parking spaces for the use. The
spaces meet the one space per guest room requirement of the Old Town Specific Plan (OTSP).
The applicant is also proposing ten off -site parking spaces along Moreno Road. The location of
these spaces is consistent with the requirements of the OTSP (Figure IV -83). These spaces are
not counted toward the on -site parking requirement for the use.
The Specific Plan establishes a build -to -line for all new buildings. Within the R /LMU district, the
building is required to be placed ten feet behind the street side property line. Arcades are
allowed to encroach into this space. The proposed building will meet the build -to line
requirement along the building frontage.
In addition to build -to -line requirements, the Specific Plan establishes allowable building and
frontage types appropriate for a vibrant public realm. The proposed project incorporates the
Commercial Block building type and Gallery frontage type which are permitted in the R /LMU
district. The building meets all design requirements and standards, including building height,
access, landscaping, size, and massing for this style.
The application is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan and has proposed an effective
design to create a vibrant streetscape.
Architecture
The architectural design of the building is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. The
three -story building incorporates a Spanish Renaissance architectural style. The structure
includes smooth stucco finish, decorative wrought iron details, arcades with round arches,
ceramic tile accents, and clay tile roofing. These elements are represented on all elevations of
the structure.
Landscaping
Trees in both 24" and 15 box sizes will be used with a variety of shrubs and other plants in five -
gallon containers. These plants will help shield the parking lot from view and soften the building
along the streetscape. All plant material used will be consistent with the requirements of the Old
Town Specific Plan.
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on December 26, 2014 and
mailed to the property owners within 1,100 -foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been
deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32,
In -Fill Development Projects).
The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is located within
City limits on a site of no more than five acres. The site recently contained a restaurant use that
has since been completely destroyed by fire. It therefore has no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species. The site is also surrounded by development and is
able to be serviced by all required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to
result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
N111 I�Le'?
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
Hotels are an allowable use within the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore the use will be
consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements for State law and
other Ordinances of the City.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the
Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions designed to ensure
the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
Vicinity Map
Plan Reductions
Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Notice of Public Hearing
VICINITY MAP
x
Project Site lD
/ / /�`V^YV/ Y L`1
2� wo 1,000
GAP
PLAN REDUCTIONS
-
1:4:�: 33
b• I : YF 1RML � _ S
�t. -\ 5• Yb s P
50 49 48 47 0.6 45 \
g = \ 131 i
R1f• -s -
.. 30 9
Rl
PE r
�o. • Sl v — 36'Ii 4 38 39 40 41,.E 42 43,
G /
64
G
o
i
aroc° =x`23' 24
20 21 22
17 18
g 10� it 12 1 r
'���s _ _ —_ s�o•wmNErcv Q �� 0. �� � wm.rc
EA. ST LE Y6 irs
�w a.om Er. 1. Lor T
wixiw
SITE PLAN � �. spew Ya asar�
}zz M
oTVaurRY+� �
w-ores sew�,�ac z Q
.r�nEn u o yay
ImRYIY WRST 9�br YCIBO I4
�Eml CESCRPr4w lOT 5, IACI M. 1..
Y9. 91/31 E
H E:R
nC1® iM•S�0•E wF.i
� sn mrr.
.w•YC � m m.. m
Iv�w�trr ;gym mmm nrm) •
wwx anYmn9. sam
i¢KD N90P®
wuL�a.Yaw� vm m b r
WOn
6�P
doses
wmo�
roaun no¢vn9+ aae: a o N
�V
a's' m mrmRi 6 �nACn F_ 'c �
aw wmu 1. omvlYr
OlR RqY( ➢: i Fu19 TA Sfdm MTIID i EtlR
raw awmc .rw 3 v3 mn. � u
Na2m
FFn2.w
�mmH
Z
m
N
o
won +4u
M m L A;D;
-
yS
_ _
_ _
... —___
—_ ._w- Ems_ _—
_— ___ —_ —_ —_
_ _ ______- -_ —_
" MORENO
RD.
a•wu�'YaTS
miw
iia
ti
.�
Ing
PVT
-
{:{
vL
��
PROPOSED
3 -STORY HOTEL
\
-
1:4:�: 33
b• I : YF 1RML � _ S
�t. -\ 5• Yb s P
50 49 48 47 0.6 45 \
g = \ 131 i
R1f• -s -
.. 30 9
Rl
PE r
�o. • Sl v — 36'Ii 4 38 39 40 41,.E 42 43,
G /
64
G
o
i
aroc° =x`23' 24
20 21 22
17 18
g 10� it 12 1 r
'���s _ _ —_ s�o•wmNErcv Q �� 0. �� � wm.rc
EA. ST LE Y6 irs
�w a.om Er. 1. Lor T
wixiw
SITE PLAN � �. spew Ya asar�
}zz M
oTVaurRY+� �
w-ores sew�,�ac z Q
.r�nEn u o yay
ImRYIY WRST 9�br YCIBO I4
�Eml CESCRPr4w lOT 5, IACI M. 1..
Y9. 91/31 E
H E:R
nC1® iM•S�0•E wF.i
� sn mrr.
.w•YC � m m.. m
Iv�w�trr ;gym mmm nrm) •
wwx anYmn9. sam
i¢KD N90P®
wuL�a.Yaw� vm m b r
WOn
6�P
doses
wmo�
roaun no¢vn9+ aae: a o N
�V
a's' m mrmRi 6 �nACn F_ 'c �
aw wmu 1. omvlYr
OlR RqY( ➢: i Fu19 TA Sfdm MTIID i EtlR
raw awmc .rw 3 v3 mn. � u
Na2m
FFn2.w
�mmH
Z
m
N
o
won +4u
M m L A;D;
-
5W 4
664
> n
G o
�pn
Qwap
'o
�O
O
4�0�T
... _ ¢ J
l s s =s
o 0
o
door
W��d
- - - - _� °� p
�. W.
r
m
V
O
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
SCALE 1 /8-
MAM1 m4
FJ.
%W
0.0piflAN
Ai
ao
0
i¢ &x
yFga
-
_
0
O O O O
L
O
_ d
n__� , d
SEOORO BOOR PLW
SGLE i /8'
WM1 sy
f1
NODII1All
Az
R FLOOR
PLAN
SCALE 1/9
ao
6¢ae
�m US
P
¢ m
¢2s
$f
ti eF
V2 n
uNsN
ZyJ�m
w <On
F
'm
z
V
O
it
flODtl/N11
SCALE ct /B "�V
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE 1 /B'
C9
L
^4 SOUTH ELEVAT
SCAIF 1/8'
III! Jill
El£N ay xoia
B
m
WES! ELEWTION
SCALE C /8'
u
e
a'gs m
F
$3 m W WJ
V PV F
2s
�F
i n
a�5
ENO
F1
Or
ReW .
6
r_
moo°
SL
y z._
EW � wulcl razuxG Rv- ME 1
EwM® wx0.'� RIx1G Y1EY - irt[ �
Z
SCYE i
F' . V
SOYRS
SCAIE
SECTION B -B SECTION A -A
1 /8- SCAtE t /8°
Oa °
8 p a
¢Zs
,. .ft
O�J
Lei4
-
F�
v
°
J
FRONT ELEVATION
—__ _ •,
- /
.
ROOF
WIF sM
m
v
SIDE ELEVATION
�x
A5
g§
Y�
K■
mO 00000 O 0 0 0 0 0 6
i� �c�c��E,s6c0cicil,a� ii �q cie4ic�
['fit ql igi;si i� ic' EI Oc� ��
fill 11
PIG ■
�I
a K. jF
T�
3 !Ilk IE 11
( DESIGN BY:
ep { MIDCIT)E ENGINEERING INC
9744 M. 1101 VATgNS OMER MR PATEL
BELLTL0MRCAW70 T1IaIMOBENCI 931BBLO0MFlELDAW. F
3 TEL (323) 63o-9555 TEMECULA CA 92590 CEMTOS, CA 90703 4 IF
TEL(3 +o)91bNaa t
SUITES
• __ i i R f11�
L
r-
Lwow �L. . �L
bomo l Mm's
Ill INE
A
%ma'
x=
,t
C O
x I
AWL
Jo"I 07�
®® OQ, �� I
I �
I N
I p r I
I
y
1 • m. l{ �i. I
J
fib
N I m
A
1 f 3'I
N TAI
N 4 P •Y M
0 1 ' L 1,, ?
P
N �®
l;� � III � "� I • � r Y � ff
R
6' e� i �!�
Ii ,I F i
�i� ,eY0�7�QpII�IaA',l�9C�pi
9 9I ! Rt R�¢ R j lip
i „ F
2 DESIGN BY: MIDCRIES ENGINUMW INC LANDSCAPE PUN OMMEA: MR PATEL
i- L q 11 9]HMAPLEST -hC: 41851MORENORD. 19318BLOOMRELDAW. SL
4 F BE OMR U 9om TEMECUU U 92590 aWTOS, U 9o7o3
j TEL (32)) 63 --9555 TEL (3,.) 918,4). 2 S J
a,
a
.1
A �
( v
Q a�
I
I N
i r IT
a !
A I
4 1
m �
i m I� A n' i !•
i
O
P
I
u
iI P r:C
i N I 0
f
fl _
• I
�� I • a. • dP 1111,11 111illil i�Jill
MIN
8t8t1�FF�N1E D
1 � � r. I (I Iii (f � II jl 1� i l!i f I �i� �eID���E� I�•1�1� € °6di
b j) � 1 1 i' X 1 1 a ♦ �� ® ®e ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®o ® ®0000
�! I � � bt�w �iia P f1" ^M Ipx a• 'I
r`
fe$1
DESIGN BY: MIDCITIE5 ENGINEERING INC LANDSCAXPAN OWNER: MR. PATEI
5 9744MAPIEST.Nm 41841MORENORD, 19318 BLOOMFIELDAVE.
f ✓� 41 BELLFLOWEP, CA W706 TEMECULACA9T590 CERRITOS, CA W7)3
r TEL (323)6309555 TEL (310) 91 &1420
wl
PC RESOLUTION
PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0058, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO CONSTRUCT A THREE -STORY 54 ROOM COMFORT
SUITES HOTEL TOTALING 31,263 SQUARE FEET.
WITHIN THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AREA,
INCLUDING AN INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, FITNESS
ROOM, AND BUSINESS CENTER, AND MAKING A
FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA), LOCATED AT
41841 MORENO ROAD (APN 921 - 070 -011)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On March 18, 2014, Firas Jamal filed Planning Application No. PA14-
0058, Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula
General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on January 7, 2015, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application
No. PA14 -0058 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plans,
Development Code Section 17.05.010.
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City;
Hotels are an allowable use within the Old Town Specific Plan. Therefore the use
will be consistent with the General Plan for Temecula as well as the requirements
for State law and other Ordinances of the City.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been reviewed and conditioned to ensure conformance with the
Development, Building, and Fire codes. These codes contain provisions
designed to ensure the protection of the public health, safety, and general
welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Development Plan Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed
project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review
(Section 15332, Class 32, Type 32);
The project meets all General Plan and Zoning policies and regulations and is
located within city limits on a site of no more than five acres. The site recently
contained a restaurant use that has since been completely destroyed by fire. It
therefore has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.
The site is also surrounded by development and is able to be serviced by all
required utilities and public services. The project is not anticipated to result in any
significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA14 -0058, a Development Plan to construct a
three -story 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel within the Old Town Specific Plan area
totaling 31,263 square feet. The hotel will be located at 41841 Moreno Road. Amenities
will include an indoor swimming pool, fitness room, and business center subject to the
Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 7th day of January, 2015.
Stanley Harter, Chairman
ATTEST:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 7th day of January, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA14 -0058
Project Description: A Development Plan to construct a three -story, 54 room Comfort
Suites Hotel totaling 31,263 square feet, within the Old Town
Specific Plan area, including an indoor swimming pool, fitness
room, and business center, located at 41841 Moreno Roada
Assessor's Parcel No.
MSHCP Category:
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Quimby Category:
Approval Date:
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
921 - 070 -011
Commercial
Service Commercial
Service Commercial
N/A (Non - Residential Project)
January 7, 2014
January 7, 2016
Within 48 Hours of the Approval of This Project
PL -1. Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning
Division a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the
amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City
to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section
21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 -hour
period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check
as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of
failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
PL -2. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to
this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend
the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims,
actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside,
annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in
furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed
for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants,
contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant
and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is
applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City
reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
PL -3. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any
modifications or revisions to the approval of this project.
PL -4. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of
substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period,
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a
Conditional Use Permit.
PL -5. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application
being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3
one -year extensions of time, one year at a time.
PL -6. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this
site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 5 Old Town.
PL -7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
PL -8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall
substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with
the Planning Division.
PL -9. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously
maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property
owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
PL -10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids,
gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the
storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this
Condition of Approval:
a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately.
b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite.
c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters.
d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain.
e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times.
PL -11. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three - foot -by- three -foot section of the
building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the
building.
PL -12. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for
permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color
and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color
and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL -13. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the
extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters
are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by staff's prior approval of the use or
utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff
determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of
Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real
party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the
decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
MATERIAL
Main Walls, Foam Trim — Smooth
Stucco Finish
Exposed Wood Rafter Tails
Clay Tile Roofing
Wrought Iron Railing
Window Mullions
COLOR
Colortek Ivory #20 — Comparable to
Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette
Classical White SW2829
Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette
Rookwood Dark Brown SW2808
Ustile by Boral - 70% Red, 15%
Mallorca, 15% Tuscany
Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette
Black Magic SW6991
Milgard, Chocolate — Comparable to
Sherwin Williams Preservation Palette
Rookwood Dark Brown SW2808
PL -14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash
receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan.
PL -15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover
and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including
the solid cover.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
PL -16. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the
underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of
transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility
companies.
PL -17. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall
be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right -of -way,
subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development.
PL -18. Archaeological /Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in
the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time during
excavation /construction of the site, archaeological /cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community
Development at his /her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a
sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and /or
authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to
the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the
discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall
notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption
of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological /cultural resource,
the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or
development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures
have been approved by the Planning Director."
PL -19. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a
Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. This
Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources and
human remains that may be impacted as a result of the development of the project,
as well as provisions for tribal monitors.
PL -20. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes
Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project
construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease,
and a qualified archaeologist and representatives of the Pechanga Tribe shall be
retained by the project sponsor to investigate the find, and make recommendations
as to treatment and mitigation."
PL -21. Archaeological Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in
the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "A qualified archaeological monitor will be
present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in
consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the
significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property."
PL -22. Tribal Monitoring of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the
Notes Section of the Grading Plan: 'Tribal monitors from the Pechanga Tribe shall
be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities,
including all archaeological surveys, testing, and studies, to be compensated by the
developer."
PL -23. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes
Section of the Grading Plan: 'The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all
cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project
area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition."
PL -24. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section
of the Grading Plan: "All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved."
PL -25. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and
approved by the Planning Division.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL -26. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an
ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of
these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the
provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule
in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
PL -27. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by
paying the appropriate City fee.
PL -28. Maintenance /Facility Removal Agreement. The maintenance /facility removal
agreement or enforceable provisions in a signed lease that will assure the intent of
the Telecommunication Facility and Antenna Ordinance will be complied with, shall
be signed by the applicant and shall be submitted to the Director of Community
Development. The agreement shall comply with all provisions set forth in Section
17.40.210 of the Ordinance.
PL -29. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the
parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the
Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. The
parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect
the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
PL -30. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized
PL -31. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction
Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the
building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location,
number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container
size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water
Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the
City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved
Grading Plan.
PL -32. Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a
minimum five -foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas.
Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
PL -33. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a
note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will
be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that
irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any
adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and
will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check
will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly,
and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved
construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape
maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The
applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
PL -34. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils
report at the first irrigation inspection."
PL -35. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include
water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in
accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo)
factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget.
PL -36. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance
program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to
assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL -37. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape
maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required.
The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are
open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications
and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be
addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a
mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two
hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation
systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed
consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will
verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape
maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to
schedule inspections.
PL -38. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped
areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the
public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; shrub planting
to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66
feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard
landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and
common areas).
PL -39. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails
and pedestrian trails within private common areas.
PL -40. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the
Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following
materials for all walls and fences:
Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right -of -way
equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots.
PL -41. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the
approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements.
PL -42. WQMP Treatment Devices. All WQMP treatment devices, including design details,
shall be shown on the construction landscape plans. If revisions are made to the
WQMP design that result in any changes to the conceptual landscape plans after
entitlement, the revisions will be shown on the construction landscape plans, subject
to the approval of the Director of Community Development.
PL -43. Roof - Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof - mounted mechanical equipment shall
not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other
energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development
approval.
PL -44. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape
construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate
screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required
by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order
to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan
planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure
that there are no conflicts with trees.
PL -45. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall
include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative
furniture, and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of
the Planning Director.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
PL -46. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading
areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the adjacent
residences and public right -of -ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that
any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are
visible from any portion of the public right -of -way adjacent to the project site, the
developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard
roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Planning Director.
PL -47. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved
construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL -48. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by
the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the
plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation
plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final
Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system
have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community
Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL -49. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to,
parking areas and striping shall be installed.
PL -50. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be
complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
PL -51. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the
recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental
Health's transmittal dated November 7, 2014, a copy of which is attached.
PL -52. Compliance with The Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. The applicant shall
comply with the recommendations set forth in the Pechanga letter transmittal dated
July 3, 2014, a copy of which is attached.
PL -53. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set
forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated March 25, 2014, a
copy of which is attached.
PL -54. Compliance with the County Geologist. The applicant shall comply with the
recommendations set forth in the County Geologist transmittal dated March 31,
2014.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Conditions
B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be
addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for
review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building
Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan
submittal.
B -2. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable
provisions of the 2013 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical
Codes; 2013 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2013
California Energy Codes, 2013 California Green Building Standards, California Title
24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code.
B -3. Green Measures. The applicant shall provide 10% voluntary green measures on
the project, as stipulated by the 2013 California Green Building Standards
B -4. Disabled Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access
provisions and building setbacks on plans to include:
a. All ground floor units to be adaptable.
b. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
c. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement.
e. Path of travel from public right -of -way to all public areas on site, such as club
house, trash enclose tot lots and picnic areas.
B -5. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of
plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County
of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light
pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical
plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be
hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of-
way.
B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed
buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial
or multi - family residential projects or a recorded final map for single - family
residential projects.
B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley
School District shall be submitted to Building and Safety to ensure the payment or
exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and
permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
B -9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light
standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.
B -10. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require
separate approvals and permits
B -11. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the
project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula
Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied
residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from
7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized
Government Holidays.
B -12. House Electrical Meter. Applicant shall provide a house electrical meter to provide
power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm
systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall
clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm
systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed.
At Plan Review Submittal
B -13. Submitting Plans and Calculations.
four (4) complete sets of plans and
and approval including:
Applicant must submit to Building and Safety
two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review
a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work.
b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the
Section 1207, of the 2013 edition of the California Building Code.
c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities.
d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the
building and the truss manufacturer engineer.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
B -14. Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted
separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for
review and approval.
B -15. Demolition Permits. A demolition permit shall be obtained if there is an existing
structure to be removed as part of the project.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
B -16. Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide
appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans.
Prior to Beginning of Construction
B -17. Pre- Construction Meeting. A pre- construction meeting is required with the building
inspector prior to the start of the building construction.
FIRE PREVENTION
General Requirements
F -1. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when
building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be
based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code
(CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
F -2. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the
remodel or construction of all residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4,000
GPM at 20 -PSI residual operating pressure for a 4 -hour duration for commercial
projects projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all
information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance
15.16.020).
F -3. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant
distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" 2 ''/2" outlets) shall
be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants
shall be spaced 350 feet apart at each intersection, and shall be located no more
than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s)
frontage to a hydrant for commercial projects. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance
15.16.020).
F -4. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion
of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction
is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an
approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on -site fire hydrants
and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter
5).
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s)
F -5. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be
designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall
be with a surface to provide all- weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be
80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with
Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to
be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City
Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -6. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an
unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for commercial and track home roads
and 20 feet for custom homes residential driveways with an unobstructed vertical
clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City
Ordinance 15.16.020).
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
F -7. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three
copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to
installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans
shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau
approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and
minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the
underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site
hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being
issued (CFC Chapter 5 and Chapter 33).
F -8. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be
submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans
must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These
plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
F -9. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to
the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be
submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm
system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans
must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit.
Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy
F -10. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of
reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -11. Addressing. New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers,
building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is
plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These
numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a
minimum of 12 -inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in
size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6 -inch high letters and /or numbers on both
the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020).
F -12. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a
minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser
sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5).
F -13. Site Plan: The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for
approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and /or
signs (CFC Chapter 5).
F -14. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an
electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be
acceptable.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PD -1. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all
buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor
window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter
would -be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows.
PD -2. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops
be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would -be burglars." Since trees
also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six -foot
clearance from the buildings.
PD -3. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height.
PD -4. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized
after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California
Code of Regulations.
PD -5. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture
installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot
candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed.
PD -6. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall
mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness.
PD -7. Outdoor Lighting During Non - Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the
Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March
18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during
non - business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments,
including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall
substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non - business hours
except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property."
Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials
shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in
accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations
PD -8. Commercial or Institution Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking
mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or
institution grade.
PD -9. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be
removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such
crimes to the Temecula Police 24 -hour dispatch Center at (951) 696 -HELP.
PD -10. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a
monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated
private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion.
All multi- tenant offices /suites /businesses located within a specific building shall
have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is
opened 24/7.
PD -11. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
PD -12. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted
rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45 -inch tall numerals
spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch
paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background.
The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the
edge of the building closest to the street.
PD -13. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings
shall be placed in a well -lit, highly visible area, and installed with a "call -out only"
feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed
within the interior of the buildings.
PD -14. Disable Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in
accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
PD -15. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail /credit card theft, citizens'
arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other
related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime
Prevention Unit.
PD -16. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through
environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute
(NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built
environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an
improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this
concept are included as conditions below:
a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition
may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the
arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying
controlled space.
b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify
when they are moving from public to semi - public to private space.
c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where
there is good surveillance and access control.
d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a
location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users
due to observation and possible intervention.
e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of
natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the
users of the areas feel safer.
f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that
may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area,
for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict.
g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk
for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance
and intervention.
h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal
users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention.
Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of
surveillance.
i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through
improved communications (portable two -way radios, for example) and design
efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building.
PD -17. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their
location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police
Department at (951) 506 -5132.
PD -18. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should
be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at
(951) 506 -5132.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
PW -1. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval,
the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes /standards at no cost to
any governmental agency.
PW -2. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the
conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant
documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the
representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
PW -3. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for onsite improvements (outside
of public right -of -way) shall be obtained from Public Works.
PW -4. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction,
encroachment permit(s) are required. An encroachment permit shall be obtained
from Public Works for public offsite improvements.
PW -5. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public /private street
improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in
compliance with Caltrans and City codes /standards; and shall include, but not
limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing /proposed
utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades.
PW -6. Right -of -Way Dedications. All easements and /or right -of -way dedications shall be
offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the
City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all
encumbrances as approved by Public Works.
PW -7. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil
engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with
the street improvement plans for approval.
PW -8. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be
privately maintained.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMIT(S)
PW -9. Grading /Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a
grading /erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public
Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and
existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all
final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction -phase pollution - prevention
controls to adequately address non - permitted runoff.
Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at:
http:// www .cityoftemecuIa.org/TemecuIa/ Government /PublicWorks /engineeringcons
tmanual.htm
PW -10. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the
provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by
posting security for private development and entering into an agreement to
guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements.
PW -11. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage
under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) General
Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following:
a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB);
b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and
c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP
Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the
Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated
and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review
www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link:
http: / /www.waterboa rd s. ca.gov /water_issues /prog rams /sto rmwate r /construction. s
html
PW -12. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O &M Agreement. The developer
shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the
initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement
process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -
specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP
Operation and Maintenance (O &M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and
approval. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link below:
http:// www .cityoftemecula.org/Temecula/ Government /PublicWorks/WQMPandNPD
ES/WQMP.htm
PW -13. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and
properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality
facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage
patterns or concentration and /or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer
constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary
permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site
shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new
cross lot drainage is not permitted.
PW -14. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer
and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with
City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm
water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 100 -year storm event) from the development
of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite
or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff.
Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm
water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a
capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing
of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided
as part of development of this project.
PW -15. Flood plain /Floodwav Development. The developer shall comply with the provisions
of Title 15, Chapter 15.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, which requires a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision ( CLOMR) from FEMA. A FEMA- approved
CLOMR shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The developer
shall pay all fees required by FEMA (and City) for processing of the FEMA reviews.
A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public
Works for review and approval.
PW -16. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be
submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall
address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction
of engineered structures and pavement sections.
PW -17. Letter of Permission /Easements. The developer shall coordinate with adjacent
property owners affected by the project's improvements and shall obtain the
required documents such as letters of permission, easement(s) and /or maintenance
agreement(s) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The
document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for
acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading
plan.
PW -18. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut -off area of
all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight
distance and visibility.
PW -19. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of
Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the
appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that
the fees have already been paid
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT(S)
PW -20. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation
due to encroaching within City right -of -way; and is responsible for any associated
costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency.
PW -21. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required
for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be
reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a
registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the
Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards.
PW -22. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street,
storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works.
PW -23. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer
to the City's Paving Notes.
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT(S)
PW -24. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be
approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public street
improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City's Old Town Specific
Plan and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall
provide adequate right -of -way and pavement transitions per Caltrans' standards to
join existing street improvements.
a. Moreno Road (Old Town Specific Plan - Alternative 1 — 88' RAN) to include
installation of half -width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer).
PW -25. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of- record
certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's
engineer -of- record certifying compaction of the building pad(s).
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
PW -26. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the
approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
This includes all onsite work (including water quality facilities), public improvements
and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement.
PW -27. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearances from
applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water
Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public
Works.
PW -28. Replacement of Damaged Improvements /Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged
or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the
satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall
be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California
Business and Professional Code Section 8771.
PW -29. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of- record
certifying satisfactory completion of all improvements per the approved plans and
from the soil's engineer —of - record certifying the final compaction.
r;OUN1 Y OF RIVERS] QF-
DEPAR'. MENT OF ENVIROI.MENTAL HEALTF
Steve Van Stock-um. Director
City of Temecula
Planning Department
c/o Eric Jones 0
PO BOX 9033 Ho''•'
Temecula, CA 92589 -9033 t✓
07 November 2014 \'
RE: PA14 -0058
The Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has received and reviewed the PA 14 -0058 for a
Development Plan (DP) to construct a three (3) story 54 rooms Comfort Suites Hotel within the
Old Town Specific Plan area, under the applicant: Jamal Firas
The planning application statement of building area is 7,556 sf and 22,153 sf for parking.
The amenities will include an indoor heated swimming pool, fitness room and business center
(APN 921- 070 -011 at 41841 Moreno Road (Old Town). Water and sewer availability for
customer use can be found along Moreno Road. A will serve letter should be required by the City
of Temecula from the Rancho California Water District for these services.
However, breakfast food vending, swimming pool construction or restaurant use of the hotel
shall require food and pool plan check compliance by the County of Riverside DEH. Please call
Bonnie Dierking, Supervising REHS at 951.461.0284 within 24 hours of the City's receipt fax of
these conditions.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 951.951.8980
Sincerely,
SR0032110
Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside
Phone: (888)722-4234
www.ri\,coeh.org
VIA E -MAIL and USPS
Mr. Eric Jones
Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
PECHANCIA CULTURAL RESOURCES
Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
Post Office. Box 2183 • Temecula. CA 92593
Telephone (951) 308 -9295 • Fax (951) 506 -9491
July 3. 2014 1")f U � �
�8 ?014
Chairperson:
Germaine Arenas
Vice Chairperson:
Mary Bear Magee
Committee Members:
Evie Gerber
Darlene Miranda
Bridgen Barcello Maxwel
Aumlia Marruffo
Richard B. Scearce, III
Director:
Gary DuBois
Coordinator:
Paul Macarm
Cultural Analyst:
Anna Hoover
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites Development Plan Located at
41841 Moreno Road
Dear Mr. Jones:
This comment letter is written on behalf of the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
(hereinafter, "the Tribe "), a federally recognized Indian tribe and sovereign government. The
Tribe formally requests, pursuant to Public Resources Code §21092.2, to be notified and
involved in the entire CEQA environmental review process for the duration of the above
referenced project (the "Project'). Please add the Tribe to your distribution list(s) for public
notices and circulation of all documents, including environmental review documents,
archeological reports, and all documents pertaining to this Project. The Tribe further requests to
be directly notified of all public hearings and scheduled approvals concerning this Project.
Please also incorporate these comments into the record of approval for this Project.
The Tribe submits these comments concerning the Project's potential impacts to cultural
resources in conjunction with the environmental review of the Project and to assist the City in
developing appropriate avoidance and preservation standards for the
THE CITY OF TEMECULA MUST INCLUDE INVOLVEMENT OF AND
CONSULTATION WITH THE PECHANGA TRIBE IN ITS ENVIRONMENTAL
REVIEW PROCESS
It has been the intent of the Federal Government) and the State of California that Indian
'See e.g., Executive Memorandum of April 29, 1994 on Government -to- Government Relations with Native
American Tribal Govemments, Executive Order of November 6, 2000 on Consultation and Coordination with
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 2
tribes be consulted with regard to issues which impact cultural and spiritual resources, as well as
other governmental concerns. The responsibility to consult with Indian tribes stems from the
unique government -to- government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes. This
arises when tribal interests are affected by the actions of governmental agencies and departments.
In this case, it is undisputed that the project lies within the Pechanga Tribe's traditional territory.
Therefore, in order to comply with CEQA and other applicable Federal and California law, it is
imperative that the City of Temecula consult with the Tribe in order to guarantee an adequate
knowledge base for an appropriate evaluation of the Project effects, as well as generating
adequate mitigation measures.
PECHANGA CULTURAL AFFILIATION TO PROJECT AREA
The Pechanga Tribe asserts that the Project area is part of Payomkawichuni (Luiseno),
and therefore the Tribe's, aboriginal territory as evidenced by the existence of Payomkawichum
place names, toola yixelval (rock art, pictographs, petroglyphs), and an extensive Luiseno artifact
record in the vicinity of the Project. This culturally sensitive area is affiliated with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseno Indians because of the Tribe's cultural ties to this area as well as extensive
history with both this Project and other projects within the area.
The Pechanga Tribe's knowledge of our ancestral boundaries is based on reliable
information passed down to us from our elders; published academic works in the areas of
anthropology, history and ethno- history; and through recorded ethnographic and linguistic
accounts. Of the many anthropologists and historians who have presented boundaries of the
Luiseno traditional territory, none have excluded the City of Temecula from their descriptions
(Sparkman 1908; Kroeber 1925; White 1963; Harvey 1974; Oxendine 1983; Smith and Freers
1994), and such territory descriptions correspond almost identically with that communicated to
the Pechanga people by our elders. While historic accounts and anthropological and linguistic
theories are important in determining traditional Luiseno territory, the most critical sources of
information used to define our traditional territories are our songs, creation accounts, and oral
traditions.
Luiseno history originates with the creation of all things at `exva Temeeku, in the present
day City of Temecula, and dispersing out to all comers of creation (what is today known as
Luiseno territory). It was at Temecula that the Luiseno deity Wuyoot lived and taught the people,
and here that he became sick, finally expiring at Lake Elsinore. Many of our songs relate the tale
of the people taking the dying Wuyoot to the many hot springs at Elsinore, where he died
(DuBois 1908). He was cremated at `exva Temeeku. It is the Luiseno creation account that
connects Elsinore to Temecula, and thus to the Temecula people who were evicted and moved to
Indian Tribal Governments, Executive Memorandum of September 23, 2004 on Government -to- Government
Relationships with Tribal Governments, and Executive Memorandum of November 5, 2009 on Tribal Consultation.
Z See California Public Resource Code §5097.9 et seq.; California Government Code § §65351, 65352.3 and 65352.4
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Commeots on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 3
the Pechanga Reservation, and now known as the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians
(the Pechanga Tribe). From Elsinore, the people spread out, establishing villages and marking
their territories. The first people also became the mountains, plants, animals and heavenly
bodies.
Many traditions and stories are passed from generation to generation by songs. One of
the Luiseno songs recounts the travels of the people to Elsinore after a great flood (DuBois
1908). From here, they again spread out to the north, south, east and west. Three songs, called
Monilvol, are songs of the places and landmarks that were destinations of the Luiseno ancestors,
several of which are located near the Project area. They describe the exact route of the Temecula
(Pechanga) people and the landmarks made by each to claim title to places in their migrations
(DuBois 1908:110). In addition, Pechanga elders state that the Temecula/Pechanga people had
usage /gathering rights to an area extending from Rawson Canyon on the east, over to Lake
Mathews on the northwest, down Temescal Canyon to Temecula, eastward to Aguanga, and then
along the crest of the Cahuilla range back to Rawson Canyon. The Project area is located within
the southern portion of this culturally affiliated territory. The Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC) Most Likely Descendent (MLD) files substantiate this habitation and
migration record from oral tradition. These examples illustrate a direct correlation between the
oral tradition and the physical place; proving the importance of songs and stories as a valid
source of information outside of the published anthropological data.
T6oia yixelval (rock art) is also an important element in the determination of Luiseno
territorial boundaries. T6oia yixelval can consist of petroglyphs (incised) elements, or
pictographs (painted) elements. The science of archaeology tells us that places can be described
through these elements. Riverside and Northern San Diego Counties are home to red - pigmented
pictograph panels. Archaeologists have adopted the name for these pictograph- versions, as
defined by Ken Hedges of the Museum of Man, as the San Luis Rey style. The San Luis Rey
style incorporates elements which include chevrons, zig -zags, dot patterns, sunbursts, handprints,
net/chain, anthropomorphic (human-like) and zoomorphic (animal -like) designs. Tribal
historians and photographs inform us that some design elements are reminiscent of Luiseno
ground paintings. A few of these design elements, particularly the flower motifs, the net/chain
and zig -zags, were sometimes depicted in Luiseno basket designs and can be observed in
remaining baskets and textiles today.
An additional type of t6ota yixelval, identified by archaeologists also as rock art or
petroglyphs, are cupules. Throughout Luiseno territory, there are certain types of large boulders,
taking the shape of mushrooms or waves, which contain numerous small pecked and ground
indentations, or cupules. Many of these cupule boulders have been identified within a few miles
of the Project. Additionally, according to historian Constance DuBois:
When the people scattered from Ekvo Temeko, Temecula, they were very
powerful. When they got to a place, they would sing a song to make water come
there, and would call that place theirs; or they would scoop out a hollow in a rock
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula. CA 92592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 4
with their hands to have that for their mark as a claim upon the land. The
different parties of people had their own marks. For instance, Albanas's ancestors
had theirs, and Lucario's people had theirs, and their own songs of Munival to tell
how they traveled from Temecula, of the spots where they stopped and about the
different places they claimed (1908:158).
The Tribe knows that the Project area is located within the Luiseno named place of
WaSAava and within a very close proximity to the village of Nemevla. Our songs and stories,
our indigenous place names, as well as academic works, demonstrate that the Luiseno people
who occupied what we know today as the City of Temecula are ancestors of the present -day
Luiseno/Pechanga people, and as such, Pechanga is culturally affiliated to this geographic area.
The Tribe welcomes the opportunity to meet with the City to further explain and provide
documentation concerning our specific cultural affiliation to lands within your jurisdiction.
PROJECT IMPACTS TO CULTURAL RESOURCES:
The Project is located in a highly sensitive region of Luiseno territory and the Tribe
believes that the possibility for recovering subsurface resources during ground - disturbing
activities is high. The Tribe has over thirty -five (35) years of experience in working with various
types of construction projects throughout its territory. The combination of this knowledge and
experience, along with the knowledge of the culturally- sensitive areas and oral tradition, is what
the Tribe relies on to make fairly accurate predictions regarding the likelihood of subsurface
resources in a particular location.
The Tribe is not opposed to this Project; however, we are opposed to any direct, indirect
and cumulative impacts this Project may have to tribal cultural resources. The Tribe's primary
concerns stem from the Project's proposed impacts on Native American cultural resources. The
Tribe is concerned about both the protection of unique and irreplaceable cultural resources, such
as Luiseno village sites, sacred sites and archaeological items which would be displaced by
ground disturbing work on the Project, and on the proper and lawful treatment of cultural items,
Native American human remains and sacred items likely to be discovered in the course of the
work.
The Tribe requests to be involved and participate with the City of Temecula in assuring
that an adequate environmental assessment is completed, and in developing all monitoring and
mitigation plans and measures for the duration of the Project. In addition, given the sensitivity of
the Project area, it is the position of the Pechanga Tribe that professional Pechanga tribal
monitors be required to be present during all ground- disturbing activities conducted in
connection with the Project, including any additional archeological excavations performed.
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseho Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Dun, Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 5
The CEQA Guidelines state that lead agencies should make provisions for inadvertent
discoveries of cultural resources (CEQA Guidelines §15064.5). As such, it is the position of the
Pechanga Tribe that an agreement specifying appropriate treatment of inadvertent discoveries of
cultural resources be executed between the Project Applicant/Developer and the Pechanga Tribe.
The Tribe believes that adequate cultural resources assessments and management must
always include a component which addresses inadvertent discoveries. Every major State and
Federal law dealing with cultural resources includes provisions addressing inadvertent
discoveries (See e.g.: CEQA (Cal. Pub. Resources Code §21083.2(i); 14 CCR §1506.5(f));
Section 106 (36 CFR §800.13); NAGPRA (43 CFR §10.4). Moreover, most state and federal
agencies have guidelines or provisions for addressing inadvertent discoveries (See e.g.: FHWA,
Section 4(f) Regulations - 771.135(g); CALTRANS, Standard Environmental Reference - 5-
10.2 and 5- 10.3). Because of the extensive presence of the Tribe's ancestors within the Project
area, it is not unreasonable to expect to find vestiges of that presence. Such cultural resources
and artifacts are significant to the Tribe as they are reminders of their ancestors. Moreover, the
Tribe is expected to protect and assure that all cultural sites of its ancestors are appropriately
treated in a respectful manner. Therefore, as noted previously, it is crucial to adequately address
the potential for inadvertent discoveries.
Further, the Pechanga Tribe believes that if human remains are discovered, State law
would apply and the mitigation measures for the permit must account for this. According to the
California Public Resources Code. § 5097.981 if Native American human remains are discovered,
the Native American Heritage Commission must name a "most likely descendant," who shall be
consulted as to the appropriate disposition of the remains. Given the Project's location in
Pechanga territory, the Pechanga Tribe intends to assert its right pursuant to California law with
regard to any remains or items discovered in the course of this Project.
PROJECT MITIGATION MEASURES
The Project is located in a sensitive area of Payomkawichum territory and we believe that the
potential to impact subsurface cultural resources is high, given that the Project area has not been
previously developed. At this time, the Tribe asks that, at a minimum, the City include the following
mitigation measures in its environmental assessment documents:
MM 1 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a
Riverside County qualified archaeological monitor to monitor all ground -
disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological
resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a
cultural resources evaluation.
MM 2 At least 30 days prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant
shall contact the Pechanga Tribe to notify the Tribe of grading, excavation and the
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseiuo Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred Is The Dutr Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 6
monitoring program, and to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and
Monitoring Agreement between the Applicant/Developer and the Tribe. The
Agreement shall address the treatment of known cultural resources, the
designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Native American
Tribal monitors during grading excavation and ground disturbing activities;
project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the
monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred
sites, and human remains discovered on the site.
MM 3 Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Archaeologist shall file a pre -
grading report with the City of Temecula (if required) to document the proposed
methodology for grading activity observation which will be determined in
consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. Said methodology shall include the
requirement for a qualified archaeological monitor to be present and to have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities. In accordance with the agreement
required in MM 2, the archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect
grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to
evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property. Tribal and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all
grading, excavation and-,groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities.
MM 4 If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section
7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County
Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to
California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in
place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and
disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the
remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must
be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must
then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving
notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then,make
recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations conceming the
treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the
Treatment Agreement described in MM 2.
MM 5 The landowner shall relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including
sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are found on the
project area to the appropriate Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.
MM 6 All cultural materials, that are collected during the grading monitoring program
and from any previous archaeological studies or excavations on the project site,
with the exception of sacred items, burial goods and human remains which will be
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians
Post Of Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 92592
Sacred 1s The Dutv Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
Pechanga Comment Letter to the City of Temecula
Re: Pechanga Tribe Comments on the Comfort Suites DP
July 3, 2014
Page 7
addressed in the Treatment Agreement required in MM2 shall be tribally curated
according to the current professional repository standards by the Pechanga Tribe.
The collections and associated records shall be transferred, including title, to the
Pechanga Tribe's curation facility which meets the standards set forth in 36 CRF
Part 79 for federal repositories. All sacred sites, should they be encountered
within the project area, shall be avoided and preserved as the preferred mitigation,
if feasible.
I MM 7 If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface archaeological /cultural resources are
discovered during grading, the Developer, the project archaeologist, and the Tribe
shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding
p the mitigation for such resources. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b)
avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. If
the Developer, the project archaeologist and the Tribe cannot agree on the
significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to '
the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director shall make the
determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act with respect to archaeological resources and shall take into account the
religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other
rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director shall be
appealable to the Planning Commission and /or City Council.
The Tribe reserves the right to fully participate in the environmental review process, as
well as to provide further comment on the Project's impacts to cultural resources and potential
mitigation for such impacts. Further, the Tribe reserves the right to participate in the regulatory
process and provide comment on issues pertaining to the regulatory process and Project
approval.
The Pechanga Tribe looks forward to working together with the City of Temecula in
protecting the invaluable Pechanga cultural resources found in the Project area. Please contact
me at 951- 770 -8104 or at ahoover @ pechanga - nsn.gov once you have had a chance to review
these comments so that we might address the issues conceming the mitigation language. Thank
you.
Sincerely,
I7 Anna Ho over4n
Cultural Analyst
Cc Pechanga Office of the General Counsel
Brenda Tomaras, Tomaras & Ogas, LLP
Pechanga Cultural Resources • Temecula Band ofLuiseho Mission Indians
Post Office Box 2183 • Temecula, CA 93592
Sacred Is The Duty Trusted Unto Our Care And With Honor We Rise To The Need
March 25, 2014
dD
Warr Eric Jones "' 16' ,¢
Project Planner'„ ?�
City of Temecula
R.ardnfDirer,nr. Post Office Box 9033
Stephen .1. Corona Temecula, CA 92589 -9033
President
doh,. Hoagland
>r vice ,, Pn�sidem
SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY
.
Rea R. Drake COMFORT SUITES DP
Lisa D. Rertnan 41841 MORENO ROAD; PA14 -0058, LOT NO. 5 OF
Hilliame.Plnmmer TRACT MAP NO. 5790; APN 921- 070 -011
me,••ste se art [JAMAL FIRAS]
Rngcr C. Zie....
Onf.... Dear Mr. Jones:
Miurhew G. Stone
GrnunJ mmnauur Please be advised that the above- referenced project/property is located within
Richard S.W'iliian,,tnt.P.t,. the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD /District).
aascnmt Wuntrer
The subject project /property fronts an existing 10 -inch diameter water pipeline
.Ieffrec D. Armetrnng
CFOrtreararer (1305 Pressure Zone) within Moreno Road.
N. Craig ElitharP. P.F..
Dit,,t,, f0,,:ru„on. c Water service to the subject projecUproperty exists (under Account No. 01-06 -
alaintenance
Andreas.. wehcter. IlF.. 27275 -5). Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject
Chief Fr,rn,r, to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service,
Belli E. Garcia as well as the completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the
District Secretary
.Tana.. R. Gilpin property owner.
Re,t Rest & Krieger LIP
General Coun -1
Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) signing an Agency
Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD. In
addition, water availability is contingent upon the timing of the subject
project/property development relative to water supply shortage
contingency measures (pursuant to RCWD's Water Shortage Contingency
Plan or other applicable ordinances), and /or the adoption of a required
Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead
Agency.
In accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5, the projecUproperty may be required
to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, and will require further
evaluation and determination by RCWD as part of the development process.
Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any
required on -site and /or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of
financial arrangements between RCWD and the property owner. Requirements
for the use of recycled water are available from RCWD.
Rancho Cad if., nia Water District
42185 Mlnche.ter Road - Post WE,, Rex 9017 - 'femeeWn. CaI,fornia 92589 903 5 • (951) 2966900 - F_4g (95D 296 6860
x a u.nmchownv,r. Gorr
Letter to Eric ,Jones /City of Tetuecula
March 25, 2014
As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact RCWD for a determination of existing
water system capability, based upon project - specific demands and /or fire flow requirements, as
well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required
for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact RCWD for an
assessment of project- specific fees and requirements. Please note that separate water meters will
be required for all landscape irrigation.
Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern
Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject
project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water
Resources Control Board and /or the basin plan objectives and the permit conditions issued by the
appropriate Regional Water Quality Control Board.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering
Services Representative at the District office at (95 1) 296 -6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
Phillip Dauben
Assistant Engineer
cc: Corey Wallace, Engineering Manager - Design
Warren Back, Engineering Manager - Planning
Heath McMahon. Construction Contracts Manager
Corry Smith. Engineering Services Supervisor
Jamal Firas. Applicant/Representative
Ly
13 \PD:Im006\F450 \FFG
Raneho CaliPornia Mate, District
42135 Winchr =ter Roed - Poxt Office Box 901, - Temecula. CalifOreia 92589 9015 (901) 29 6-6900 - FAX (951) 2966860
www.raochuwater.com
Juan C. Perez `y
Interim Plan I nj ng Director t
I. IS
March 1. 2014 Pages 2 (including this cover)
City of Temecula Planning Department
FAX: (95 ) 694 -6477
Attention: Eric Jones
RE: dE002376 COA
Clomfort Suites DP
Catty of Temecula Case No. PA14 -0058
County Geologic Report (GEO) No. 2376, submitted for this City of Temecula project (PP14 -0058) was
praparec by GSS Engineering, Inc. and is entitled: "Report Preliminary Soil Investigation Proposed
Motel bl. ilding 41841 Moreno Road Temecula, California 92590 ", dated January 6, 2014. In addition,
GSS pre pared "Response to County Review Comments Letter Proposed Motel Building 41841 Moreno
Road T mecula, California 92590 ", dated September 97, 2014. This document is herein incorporated
as a par of GE002376.
GE002176 concluded
t
1 1 he site is not located within a currently designated4lquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No
faults, active or potentially active, are known to exist within the site.
- a
2. 1 he probability . of surface rupture at the site is considered very low.
3. I he potential of soil liquefaction at the site is considered very low owing to the absence of near
surface groundwater.
4. 1 he hydro - consolidation potential of the onsite soil is considered low.
GE0021,76 recommended:
1. i Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of asphalt, concrete slab, vegetation such
s brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees;.roots of trees and otherwise deleterious natural material
f om the areas to be graded..
2. 1 Existing paving and.concrete slabs should be removed from the site.
3. All of the existing onsite fill and loose or disturbed surface natural soils within the proposed
construction areas be removed to underlying competent natural soil and replaced with properly
compacted fill for slab and pavement support.
CEO No. 2376 satisfies the requirement for a geologic /geotech mica I study: for Planning /CEQA
purposes. CEO No. 2376 is hereby accepted for Planning purposes. Engineering and other Uniform
Buildinng Code parameters were not included as apart of this review or approval: This approval is not
intende and should not be misconstrued as approval for grading permit. Engineering and other
building code parameters should be reviewed and additional comments and /or conditions may be
Imposed by the City upon application for grading and /or building permits:'
'side Office •:4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Desert Office i 77588 El Dune Court
Box 1409, Riverside, C8VOmle 92502 -1409 Palm Desert, Californla' 92211
(951) 955 -3200 • Fox (951) 955 -1811 (760) 863 -8277 • Fax (760)863.7555
From 9519551811
Page_ V2
Date: 11/25/2014 12001 PM
R1;
V.ER.51DE
COUNTY
PLANNING"
DEPIAR�TME'NT
Juan C. Perez `y
Interim Plan I nj ng Director t
I. IS
March 1. 2014 Pages 2 (including this cover)
City of Temecula Planning Department
FAX: (95 ) 694 -6477
Attention: Eric Jones
RE: dE002376 COA
Clomfort Suites DP
Catty of Temecula Case No. PA14 -0058
County Geologic Report (GEO) No. 2376, submitted for this City of Temecula project (PP14 -0058) was
praparec by GSS Engineering, Inc. and is entitled: "Report Preliminary Soil Investigation Proposed
Motel bl. ilding 41841 Moreno Road Temecula, California 92590 ", dated January 6, 2014. In addition,
GSS pre pared "Response to County Review Comments Letter Proposed Motel Building 41841 Moreno
Road T mecula, California 92590 ", dated September 97, 2014. This document is herein incorporated
as a par of GE002376.
GE002176 concluded
t
1 1 he site is not located within a currently designated4lquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No
faults, active or potentially active, are known to exist within the site.
- a
2. 1 he probability . of surface rupture at the site is considered very low.
3. I he potential of soil liquefaction at the site is considered very low owing to the absence of near
surface groundwater.
4. 1 he hydro - consolidation potential of the onsite soil is considered low.
GE0021,76 recommended:
1. i Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of asphalt, concrete slab, vegetation such
s brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees;.roots of trees and otherwise deleterious natural material
f om the areas to be graded..
2. 1 Existing paving and.concrete slabs should be removed from the site.
3. All of the existing onsite fill and loose or disturbed surface natural soils within the proposed
construction areas be removed to underlying competent natural soil and replaced with properly
compacted fill for slab and pavement support.
CEO No. 2376 satisfies the requirement for a geologic /geotech mica I study: for Planning /CEQA
purposes. CEO No. 2376 is hereby accepted for Planning purposes. Engineering and other Uniform
Buildinng Code parameters were not included as apart of this review or approval: This approval is not
intende and should not be misconstrued as approval for grading permit. Engineering and other
building code parameters should be reviewed and additional comments and /or conditions may be
Imposed by the City upon application for grading and /or building permits:'
'side Office •:4080 Lemon Street, 12th Floor Desert Office i 77588 El Dune Court
Box 1409, Riverside, C8VOmle 92502 -1409 Palm Desert, Californla' 92211
(951) 955 -3200 • Fox (951) 955 -1811 (760) 863 -8277 • Fax (760)863.7555
L L From 9519551811 Page M Date. 110512014 120.01 PM
i
Than i you for the opportunity to review this case for the City of Temecula. Please call me at
(95 ) 955 -6863 if you have any questions,
S ncerely,
R VERSIDE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT._
Juan C. Perez, Interim Planning director
I L Jones, CEO No. 2283
ief i5ingineering Geologist, TLMA- Planning
c : GSS Engineering, Inc. Fax: (562)698 =5771
Temecula File: PA14 -0058
GEO02376
R Goology%Temewla ROVIOWTAGEO 02376 Approval for PA14.0058.dOCX .
i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING
COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Case No: PA14 -0058
Applicant: Firas Jamal
Proposal: A Development Plan to construct a three -story 54 room Comfort Suites Hotel
within the Old Town Specific Plan area totaling 31,263 square feet. The hotel will
be located at 41841 Moreno Road. Amenities will include an indoor swimming
pool, fitness room, and business center
Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will
be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15332, Class 32, In -Fill
Development Projects)
Case Planner: Eric Jones, (951) 506 -5115
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers
Date of Hearing: January 7, 2015
Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m.
ys \\
rs���ao Project Site
O `
0 125 250 500
.'t1 Feet
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the
Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning
Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website —
www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding
any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main
Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In
addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.ora — and will be
available for public review at the respective meeting.
If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the
Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400.
ITEM 6
STAFF REPORT — PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2014
TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning
Commission
FROM: Armando G. Villa, AICP, Director of Community Development
PREPARED BY: James Atkins. Case Planner
PROJECT Planning Application Nos. PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909, a Home
SUMMARY: Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99
single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor
Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the
cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in
Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally
located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot
Springs Road.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of
Approval
CEQA: Section 15162 Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations. No
further analysis is required.
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Name of Applicant: Scott Hansen, KB Home
General Plan SP -11, Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan
Designation:
Zoning Designation: LM — Low Medium Density Residential
Existing Conditions/
Land Use:
Site: Vacant
North: Single - Family Residential — across Murrieta Hot Springs Road
South: Single - Family Residential — (VL) Very Low Density
East: Single - Family Residential — (LM) Low Medium Density
West: Single - Family Residential — (LM) Low Medium Density
1
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
The property entitled Roripaugh Ranch received approval for a Zone Change to Specific Plan
(SP -11), on November 26, 2002. The community is proposed to comprise 2,015 single - family
lots on 804.7 gross acres, resulting in an overall density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. The
subdivision is designed and designated as a Low Medium Density community (LM) with
amenities that include 24.8 acres for two public park sites, 9.1 acres for two private recreation
centers and a private mini -park. This is KB Home's final section in this particular area of
Roripaugh Ranch to be developed as the tracts on both the east and west are approaching build
out.
On September 23, 2014, the applicant submitted Planning Application PA14 -0219, a Home
Product Review application for 99 single - family residential units. The application will allow KB
Home to select and update specific product types for the community. The Roripaugh Ranch
Specific Plan identifies 14 specific architectural styles for product type that may be utilized within
the community: American Farmhouse, California Ranch, Classic Revival, Colonial,
Contemporary Southwest, Craftsman, East Coast Traditional, French Cottage, Italianate,
Mediterranean, Mission, Monterey, Prairie Style, and Spanish Revival.
ANALYSIS
Architecture
KB Home has selected Classic Revival, Monterey, Prairie Style, and Spanish Revival for this
submittal which includes four (4) distinct plans comprised of one (1) single -story, and three (3)
two -story plans. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requires single -story volumes and
architecture forward concepts in at least 50% of the homes in this planning area.
Each elevation provides distinct architectural treatment and articulation. Visual interest is
achieved through the use of varied wall planes, projections and recesses to provide shadow and
depth. Varying roof forms, floor plans, and changes in colors and materials emphasize the
various architectural styles. The proposed plans include well defined front entries with the use
of arched entries, extended porches, and the use of different materials around the entry.
Garage and front doors are unique to the architectural style of the home. The proposed roof
pitches provide variety in the street scene and they are representative of the architectural style.
The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan encourages the use of stucco as the primary wall material
with light earth tone colors on primary wall surfaces and contrasting trim colors. The project
includes twelve different combinations of building materials and colors for the four elevation
styles. The color variation, stucco, and stone materials serve to break up the massing of the
two -story units as required by the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The variation of material and
colors helps individualize each home and creates character in the neighborhood. Each
proposed architectural style has three distinct color schemes that customize the style. The
materials include a variety of roof types, stucco and trim colors, and decorative features. The
intent of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan has been achieved by ensuring a continuity of
colors, materials and textures throughout the entire development.
The applicant has provided specific details which are unique to each proposed architectural
style and elevation. Each of the four proposed styles is therefore distinct through the use of
material treatment, massing and geometries, and color palates on all elevations of each
product. The features which attempt to achieve this character are defined below for each
specific style:
4
• Spanish Revival: Stucco finish, concrete 'S' tile roof, 5:12 roof pitch, combination of
gable and hipped roofs, clay pipe accents, exposed rafter tails and wood fascia, arched
entrances, arched and rectangular multi -pane windows and decorative shutters,
decorative Spanish tiles at front porches and entries, decorative wrought iron, and
decorative foam trim elements.
• Prairie: stucco finish, concrete flat tile roof, 4:12 roof pitch, hipped roofs, wood fascia,
decorative multi -pane windows, and decorative foam trim elements.
• Classic Revival: stucco finish, flat tile roof, 6:12 to 8:12 roof pitch, combination of gable
and hipped roofs, wood fascia, decorative vents and trim under gable roofs, decorative
multi -pane windows and shutters, decorative columns at porches, and decorative foam
trim elements.
• Monterey: stucco finish, concrete flat 'S' roof, 5:12 roof pitch, wood fascia, second -story
cantilevered balcony with decorative wood posts and railing, rectangular multi -pane
windows and decorative shutters, and decorative foam trim elements.
Product Placement and Enhancement
In addition to the varied architectural styles, the proposed product placement provides a varied
and visually interesting street scene which has been achieved through creative product
placement and alternately reversed floor plans throughout the development. The products have
been plotted to avoid repetition in plan and elevation type to meet the intent of the Roripaugh
Ranch Specific Plan. Elevations that are visible from a public street or an open space area
have been designed and conditioned to incorporate architectural enhancements which include
pop outs, shutters, and additional roof elements. The lots that require additional enhancements
are identified on the plotting plan. A Condition of Approval has been included to require these
enhanced lots to be clearly identified on the Precise Grading Plan and Building Plans.
Minor Exception
The plotting and grading of Map TR 29661 -1 has created physical conditions and single lot
geometry on one lot in ninety -nine. Lot 41 is unique in that the width creates a situation where
standard home products do not fit within the defined building cornerside setbacks prescribed
within the development standards of the Specific Plan. As a result, any home builder offering
product on the remaining 98 lots, could not utilize their proposed product for this single lot. This
burden creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships due to the strict application of
the Specific Plan's Development Standards.
The Specific Plan requires cornerside setbacks of 15 feet. As plotted, home products with
widths of 40 feet and less only, would fit on this single lot when applying the prescribed
setbacks. On the remaining 98 lots of this map, home products of 45 feet and 50 feet wide are
proposed. In order to continue the use of the proposed home product for this map, a reduction
of 2 feet to the cornerside setback is proposed. This reduction results in a 13 percent
difference, and is within the 15 percent reduction allowed by the Development Code. This
resulting width meets the intent of Development Standards with respect to cornerside setbacks,
visibility triangles, and lines of site.
X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.dou
3
LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS
Notice of the public hearing was published in the U -T San Diego on December 26, 2014 and
mailed to the property owners within the required 600 -foot radius.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs
and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification of an EIR or the adoption of a
negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared unless substantial changes have
been made, new information of substantial importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative
Declaration becomes available, or further discretionary approvals for the project requires one.
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and is exempt from further
environmental review.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.01 OF)
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.
As conditioned, the proposed single - family homes are permitted in the land use designation
standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code.
The project is also consistent with the Low- Medium Residential land use designation contained
in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned and is physically suitable for the
type and density of residential development proposed. The project is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building
codes.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety,
and general welfare.
As conditioned, the overall design of the single- family homes, including the site, building,
parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to
protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been
reviewed and has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards
and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
Minor Exception (Code Section 17.03.060D)
There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict application of the code
due to the physical characteristics of the property.
The existing map and physical conditions as a result of grading and plotting TR 29661 -1 allow
for the builder's home product to fit on 98 of 99 lots. Lot 41 is a unique exception which creates
practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships due to the strict application of the Specific
Plan's Development Standards. A reduction of the cornerside setback by 13 percent is within
the allowable 15 percent reduction of the Development Code and meets the intent of
X:\2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.docx
4
Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and
lines of site.
The minor exception does not grant special privileges which are not otherwise available to
surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of
other persons located in the vicinity.
Permitting this minor exception will not grant special privileges to the builder as this condition is
unique to one lot and is intended to meet the intent of the Specific Plan's Development
Standards. The result of permitting this minor exception will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or to the property of other persons as the reduction to the setback meets the intent of
Development Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and
lines of site. The project has been reviewed and has been found to be consistent with all
applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the
development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the
public health, safety, and welfare.
The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect surrounding properties
and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the zone.
As conditioned, the permitted use of single- family homes, including the site, building, circulation
and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health
and safety of the surrounding properties and is permitted use within this zone and will be
constructed and function in a manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety,
and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
Aerial Map
Plan Reductions
Resolution
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Notice of Public Hearing
X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 - 0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission \Staff Report.dou
5
AERIAL MAP
City of Temecula
�a
_7 -*~ z.
u
4..«.. -.. ......r... .•..ire.+........ —..- .ar- sv.wr..
11.v:f of rc...
Project Site
on
Z
Z
7
PA 14 -02 19
° 8
m 3
z z
o f
a
C
poiNr oR "
a
s •
se as
� 3 .
- �••�_. ••+•••••..r� •ruro�ewreMV(t�asrf.+.....r....
eat
BRE V i.l:
is
F
�
POLO CREEK DR .
`a i
i
Dt, or no responsibility
nforma The airy of Te „al.epresented
ap
NORTH
n this
'�mrrmauon orribinea on hma map Data and infor
Data ondorap
on day map
subtect ho update an a mumbo eon. The GeoerepMClnformetbn system and
Geographic Information
other sources should be yuered for Me most current inrormebon.
°
b
y .-
w fe
Of
U
°
z er 9�
I
t !J
System:
r.I.
r
a zsa
sao
eat
The Mu M dewed from e data Temecula y Me Riverdale County as m.
memep mt as
aete oroaucen bytbegiment
Department andMFambase
Agency Rlyfor e
imnapMeOOnnes Lena Management em Neenry
Dt, or no responsibility
nforma The airy of Te „al.epresented
ap
NORTH
n this
'�mrrmauon orribinea on hma map Data and infor
Data ondorap
on day map
subtect ho update an a mumbo eon. The GeoerepMClnformetbn system and
Geographic Information
other sources should be yuered for Me most current inrormebon.
The map is not for report or mule.
Geographic nformatior
System:
PLAN REDUCTIONS
«.12P
ma
rtrnc,ul
snxcvon
ra�Y n
YFL-51(liI
�ooc
5 13 PIYIF mCM
( \IYLItkTF S TIIF
IMILALI
wmrl5xu
�
5
Matt
• .•
•, � � _�
OKOMIIVE CIAY nE
146
SNCCDOV[II
iMY1PO1
S.
>�<'•' ��
'
����
STUCOOIIY611
IlwfEl
SBCIY51IAl fW.50E
DUOY
� 1% �
7
RON p9@R�M
STSCOOVk2
F6\Y 1LY
PRAIRIE ELEVATION
SPANISH REVIVAL ELEVATION
m�nere nwr
WaoocoEUei
�,a A
mcmavn
aYr n1Y
wmrl5xu
�
�I
oa�oumh
(LACE)
mccvova
mu1 nr
seciEOrinE
cnancP
moe
;�� RORIPAl1GH RANCH
TO ORDER n 11d !WII -1
cm ar nY1LVlA
«I_wor
ma
IT FlCAL)
V'
�,a A
mcmavn
aYr n1Y
'11
oa�oumh
CLASSIC REVIVAL ELEVATION
First Floor Plan
RORIPAUGH RANCH n.
TRAU7 NO 2n 1 -2
ORDER ._..,...w
C" I IY! III flNIECULA
BEDROOM BED ROOM
n
MASTER
m..
i
BEDROOM
O O
i
a -i
GREAT
ROOM
nit�
GARAGE
FLEX
i
KITCHEN
First Floor Plan
RORIPAUGH RANCH n.
TRAU7 NO 2n 1 -2
ORDER ._..,...w
C" I IY! III flNIECULA
LEFT ELEVATION
w r
0
e0
FRONT FLFVATK)N
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
SPANISH REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH s
TO ORDER • �wnrw wig �.
l III Uf lEllFl l'LA
LEFT ELEVATION
H----- -- -�-------- -- --- -- - - ---
RIGHT ELEVATION
RORIPAUGH RANCH
nxT w ww.�
cm' ix ir.�ci2'u
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
�LIC� LAC
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
PRAIRIE
RORIPAUGH RANCH
T OORDER anofineanw rn (l W).: l -i .. ..,.,
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT Q.EVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVA71M
PRAIRM
RORIPAUGH RANCH _
TO ORDER
arc oe �enn.A
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
CLASSIC REVIVAL
Ma[� u �' .—' RORIPAUGH RANCH
T"O OROER '"
rnv iwy� E.wn.�n
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION
ENHANCED LOT CONDITION
RORIPALIGH RANCH
111 V'f � AYI -1
unY1l1 ll I LLA
REAR ELEVATION
ttl o
FFIE
RER.\
SFIE.0 m
��OOE
>titTQl
WN
�OF
5:1: tOOi FIICN
f>•YIICAL)
fCall
(LACEI
SI FOAM O AM
AM RM
$ECF%MAL CNRACf
OWR
SPANISH REVIVAL ELEVATION
PRAIRIE ELEVATION
liwu�t Yur
tn,
VUOD FASCIA
IM I
1ltA.lU IWEN
MCI
SFI wUVEP
FOAM Rd
SCLTIWI.
(iAEA(I
f1f10•
nm Win
RORIPAUCH RANCH
TO ORDER crry of tFr�anw nwcT na 3fEN -1
Cpi Ew T RE
+AACi I lu a m'n
osl>turrvE S.nrtlEas
pR \YAtI\'F tIAY TII f
1lFS
79 11
71p ]III
1I [i
�iE1 ■1t
CLASSIC REVIVAL ELEVATION
cllau
Fncll
111EW1M
VFrT
MfCWi1VF
LRIT1FtS
r lII FOR
Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan
1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH
TMGTNO.2 1 -2
TO ORDER ...�.,s
UTl OF TE11H'ULA
1
KITCHEN
_
n �
_
aw
wm
BEDRTER
OOM
r
- r-
�+
J
GARAGE
.9 DEN
' co a
BEDROOM
2
{
F
wnw i i
`- LOFT
BEDROOM
S
� I'
.wa.
_u
i
i
i
i
i
Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan
1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH
TMGTNO.2 1 -2
TO ORDER ...�.,s
UTl OF TE11H'ULA
ROOM
KITCHEN
aw
HOBBY _^
r
- r-
�+
J
GARAGE
.9 DEN
k
wnw i i
Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan
1 �,,;•"`_ "" RORIPAUGH RANCH
TMGTNO.2 1 -2
TO ORDER ...�.,s
UTl OF TE11H'ULA
M
ae
LEFT ELEVATION
0
vo
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATR)%
W =
no .
w w
w w
RORIPAUGH RANCH
mulww -i
1�rr nr reieiva
REAR ELEVATION
,// A
.:
n.
..
w
ma
w
r
LEFT ELEVATION
0
vo
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATR)%
W =
no .
w w
w w
RORIPAUGH RANCH
mulww -i
1�rr nr reieiva
REAR ELEVATION
.0
w
w
w
LEFT ELEVATION
0
vo
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATR)%
W =
no .
w w
w w
RORIPAUGH RANCH
mulww -i
1�rr nr reieiva
REAR ELEVATION
.0
w
w
LEFT ELEVATION
0
vo
RIGHT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATR)%
W =
no .
w w
w w
RORIPAUGH RANCH
mulww -i
1�rr nr reieiva
REAR ELEVATION
LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION
FRONT ELEVATION
A
vp
i"
'00
mom
LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION
FRONT ELEVATION
A
i"
7.1
mom
'11111
a, a
1321
U
on
■ i
N1
�
iii
au
��'
a� is
iu
1/r
AMIN
1r.
Nam
LF.Fa FI.FN, \TION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT FLFVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION RFAR FLEV'ATIOK
SPANISH REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH
a'm Ir T[Ltccu
a, a
1321
U
�-
N11 al- ,an
iii
au
��'
a� is
iu
AMIN
121 n
-
-
1u ea is a1E
�..
idJ
J6a
Y0 1l11 ME
m
SEE
N:
:M
..�
III
RIGHT FLFVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION RFAR FLEV'ATIOK
SPANISH REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH
a'm Ir T[Ltccu
MW
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
PRAIRIE
RORIPAUGH RANCH
mA�� nai �ssei -�
TO ORDER j MY 1w 1 LWULA `� •
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
PRAIRIE
RORIPAUGH RANCH
• TO ORC)ER n.l t �u :.e.i -1 _
4 11\ IM ITlll LA
■
■
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
CLASSIC REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER n (TNO._ l I a
cm' � Texccuu
Abbe.,
LEFT ELEVATION
- ----- - ---= - - - -- - -----------------
FRONT I I I V A TION
AJAW � qlqw
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
CLASSIC REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO SEEL OR04ER c'm (;nWIILA
412 W
m
(n m,
STLLLOV
esHU n
RK�
Wl�d
9 114
4AK�
IN
"2 FRA1F m
(MICFFW,�
FYlM:911AS�LLf
Slik[.D V<RNI
(FACp
ORCOIIAnVE
Tuv rur, nFFa
snrcoovsR
FOAM TRIP
SFANMH REVIVAL ELEVATION
PRAIRIE ELEVATION
kQ ROaf
m®
mrru�
corsnFn stAr
fOR1Hn TT�E
R�OOY FASOA
mr)
SFIRLIIFR'®1
SFIKYUOVFA
FOAM 1RO1
Slf'iRNAI.
IiARA(E
PICM
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER myarFasavu T (7w) 3 l I
111M3F1£ S' TIl2
wvm Fws[u (Ttt.l
SfINTT1 f1VFR
ii1W TRIM
fAY�ORAiR'F WRq M'M
i[M ELFAIWT
9iRT V f1A15H
)uixi
MONTEREY ELEVATION
rs
LL)
T ovFR
RN .
,4vD
AT
m
Second Floor Plan First FIWT Plan
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER �° TRACT NU. �1 -z
UT OFTEMECULA
KITCHEN
I
!I
I
CP
GREAT
I
ROOM
I
HOBBY
r..r
i FLEX
GARAGE
DEN
Second Floor Plan First FIWT Plan
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER �° TRACT NU. �1 -z
UT OFTEMECULA
e
LEFT ELEVATION
i
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
SPANISH REVIVAL
RORIPAUUH RANCH
IM1 NI }bl -1
TO ORDER 1 of T[Alfl Ll� ••.• ••
*L
is
T M
'I Ll .......
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
a
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
SPANISH REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH
TD ORDER ••+' —•_'! I1LN1413YM1 -1 w u.n
l'T'Oi TilEl'LL.
Q —
■
LEFT ELEVATION
m
mow— Form-1
I WAN
FRONT ELEVATN)N
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION-
PRAIRIE
RORIPALGH RANCH
TO ORDER rle �Irwl vel -I �.
ll1111111. WlI It
viturtai .. ii G� 2i3OL1D 01
r�w�: m imu
31NIVMd
WAIVA]I I 4V38 NOIIIONOJ 101 (ITAVH43 NOIIVA313 ]]FJIN
w min
NOLLVA313 7NOI13 NOI1V A313 1331
I
■ ■
LEFT ELEVATION
I
b J
..� RL ;.
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT FLF%, \TII ?N REAR ELEVATION
MONTEREY
C RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER "" rwuT�u' .vml.l ...
UT\ Vi Ii vr, a
I
LEFT ELEVATION
I
Kj
IA ■
r �` -' •f Wlp�
FRONT ELEVATION
Hoy
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
MONTEREY
• C !' "rim RORIPAUGH RANCH
TO ORDER .•..�;_ axe. i u. wi -i �.
t IT ali TE•Et t'L\
s 12
MCI
,r REAL
s lcco 0v
Fl N MM
IIH'.FSSFI
wwonw
SFL'iNW/J
�aDl
ci2laxs Fnal
(fYF1[M I
SRI ®FREII
/1w1E1
snccoOVFl
FOAM lEY
Of('glAl1VE
SIRTIFl3
SFlT1C1#AL fi4MSE
IXIMI
MONTEREY ELEVATION
cunatere s n1E
�Rm FAYIA fD'F)
Sn1CCDOVFI
fOAY IEM
SnAIU FPOII
I�EI
s�
crrxweiESUr f � s.i�off
wmR FAw'u
Inr 1 i
=
Kul ' _ anmsis
QM
Sn %CO FM91 _ _ d —j.� -. f�1RVF
IIMFI _ a- :tit-. ' � YHIf
7A
serr1o11AL �.
-
uoal
PRAIRIE ELEVATION CLASSIC REVIVAL ff EVATION
x �" RORIPAUGH RANCH
'? °a -
TO.ORDER) " «° FwTro lRil�l
CII l 1FM VLA Y-i
_ RORIPAUGH RANCH
TRAC'NO, -Y I -2
Cl I I OF TENECULA
FLEX
DEN
Vie^
GREAT
ROOM
w.n R
A
n
KITCHEN eiV
n
GARAGE
-•
R
BEDROOM si
HOBBY �
5 �
0
_ RORIPAUGH RANCH
TRAC'NO, -Y I -2
Cl I I OF TENECULA
Smond Fluor Plan
HUM RORIPAUGH RANCH _.,...
TO ORDER rRAIA No.2 a 1 -2
Cl IY OF TE.MECULA
�rxmr
LOFT
1,
�-
i'
MASTER -----------
BEDROOM
_____
�
e�w
U
�1
BEDROOM
— '
I
2
BEDROOM
< BEDROOM
3
I R
'F-Ix
O O fi__ _
J_ i
Smond Fluor Plan
HUM RORIPAUGH RANCH _.,...
TO ORDER rRAIA No.2 a 1 -2
Cl IY OF TE.MECULA
L I
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
A _... _�.---- --- ---- �--- -----------------
. - -- - -------� -- --
RIGHT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION
PRAIRIE
lfm
_ RORIPAUGN RAN(Ti
b
Tu l vt !Y1bL
TO ORDF -R OIY IN RLIIILY `-
n
w
LEFT ELEVATION
A w
FRONT ELEVATION
T - -�I
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
PRAIRIE
RORIPAUGH RANCH au
TIIN T MI !tll -1
TO ORDER I ll1Y.M+1}YLL'lU � N
LEFF ELEVATION
- - - - ------ - - - - --
RIGHT ELEVATION
RORIPAUGH RANCH
<m���s naafifi Iu
9-t v"
.
REAR ELEVATION
LEFT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATON
a am
® ■ m ME
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
CLASSIC REVIVAL
RORIPAUGH RANCH *�
TO ORDER "' " "'t"°
C- m' iw reHEa'i: LA
e
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
f f -7
■
r ' W
r m y.
RIGHT ELEVATION RE AR EI1 . %Tlo\
%IONTEREY
M ! 'fl um ,,.,"" ... RORIPAUGH RANCH _.
TO ORDER T1111 t 4A .W 1 -1
lrtY Iw RVlI l U
B
Eno
LEFT ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
RIGHT ELEVATION ENHANCED LOT CONDITION REAR ELEVATION
MONTEREY
RORIPAUGH RANCH M�
TO ORDER ",•, - „”- mu-rw wci -� ,.. -
<'ffY
PC RESOLUTION
PC RESOLUTION NO. 15-
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA14 -0219 AND PA14 -2909, A HOME
PRODUCT REVIEW APPLICATION TO ALLOW KB HOME
TO CONSTRUCT 99 SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
UNITS IN RORIPAUGH RANCH AND A MINOR
EXCEPTION FOR THE SIDE -YARD SETBACK ON LOT 41
TO REDUCE THE CORNERSIDE SETBACK FROM 15
FEET TO 13 FEET AND MAKING A FINDING OF
EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA). THE SITE IS
LOCATED IN RORIPAUGH RANCH ON TR 29661 -1
(PLANNING AREA 2) AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED
WEST OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND SOUTH OF
MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (APNS: 957 - 710 -001 —
012; 957 - 711 -001 — 044; 957 - 712 -001 — 014; 957 - 713 -001 —
013; 957 - 720 -001 — 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; AND 957 -723-
001)
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of
Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that:
A. On September 23, 2014 the applicant filed Planning Application No.
PA14 -0219, a Home Product Review Application, in a manner in accord with the City of
Temecula General Plan and Development Code.
B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to, a public
notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law.
C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the
Application and environmental review on January 7, 2015, at a duly noticed public
hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an
opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.
D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due
consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application
No. PA14 -0219 subject to, and based upon, the findings set forth hereunder.
E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the
Application hereby finds, determines and declares that:
Development Code (Section 17.05.010.F).
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula
and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City;
As conditioned, proposed single- family homes are permitted in the land use
designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the
City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low - Medium
Residential land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is
properly planned and zoned and is physically suitable for the type and density of
residential development proposed. The project is also consistent with other
applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines,
and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the
public health, safety, and general welfare;
As conditioned, the overall design of the single- family homes, including the site,
building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is
consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in
and around the site. The project has been reviewed for and has been found to
be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations
intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a
manner consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
Minor Exception (Code Section 17.03.060D)
C. There are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships created by strict
application of the code due to the physical characteristics of the property;
The existing map and physical conditions as a result of grading and plotting TR
29661 -1 allow for the builder's home product to fit on 98 of 99 lots. Lot 41 is a
unique exception which creates practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships
due to the strict application of the Specific Plan's Development Standards. A
reduction of the cornerside setback by 13 percent is within the allowable 15
percent reduction of the Development Code and meets the intent of Development
Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and
lines of site.
D. The minor exception does not grant special privileges which are not
otherwise available to surrounding properties and will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or to the property of other persons located in the vicinity;
Permitting this minor exception will not grant special privileges to the builder as
this condition is unique to one lot and is intended to meet the intent of the
Specific Plan's Development Standards. The result of permitting this minor
exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or to the property of other
persons as the reduction to the setback meets the intent of Development
Standards with respect to cornerside side -yard setbacks, visibility triangles, and
lines of site. The project has been reviewed and has been found to be consistent
with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to
ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner
consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare.
E. The minor exception places suitable conditions on the property to protect
surrounding properties and does not permit uses which are not otherwise allowed in the
zone;
As conditioned, the permitted use of single- family homes, including the site,
building, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with,
and intended to protect the health and safety of the surrounding properties and is
permitted use within this zone and will be constructed and function in a manner
consistent with the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes
the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval
of the Modification Application:
A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, (Section
15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations), following a project's certification
of an EIR or the adoption of a negative declaration, no subsequent EIR shall be
prepared unless substantial changes have been made, new information of substantial
importance regarding the previous EIR or Negative Declaration becomes available, or
further discretionary approvals for the project requires one. Therefore the proposed
project has been deemed to be exempt from further environmental review;
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
approves Planning Application No. PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909, a Home Product
Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single - family residential units in
Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce
the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch
on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is generally located west of Butterfield Stage
Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, (APN: 957 - 340 -048) subject to the
Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein
by this reference.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 7th day of January, 2015.
Stanley Harter, Chairman
ATTEST:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Armando G. Villa, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 15- was duly and regularly
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 7th day of January, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Armando G. Villa, AICP
Secretary
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909
Project Description: A Home Product Review application to allow KB Home to
construct 99 single - family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch
and a Minor Exception for the side -yard setback on Lot 41 to
reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet. The site is
located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and
is generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of
Murrieta Hot Springs Road.
Assessor's Parcel No.: 957 - 710 -001 — 012; 957 - 711 -001 — 044; 957 - 712 -001 — 014; 957-
713 -001 — 013; 957 - 720 -001 — 003; 957 - 722 -001 — 013; and 957-
723 -001
MSHCP Category: Single - Family Residential (less than 8 du /ac)
DIF Category: Residential - Detached
TUMF Category: Single - Family Residential
Quimby Category: Single - Family with Attached Garage
Approval Date: January 7, 2015
Expiration Date: January 7, 2017
PLANNING DIVISION
General Requirements
PL -1. Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to
this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend
the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims,
actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside,
annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in
furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof,
advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the
voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed
for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or
any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants,
contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant
and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is
applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City
reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
PL -2. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any
modifications or revisions to the approval of this project.
PL -3. Site Plan and Elevations. The development of the premises shall substantially
conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning
Department.
PL -4. Enhanced Elevations. All enhanced elevation locations identified on the Product
Placement Plan shall also be identified on the Precise Grading Plans ( "E ") and
Building Construction Plans.
PL -5. Expiration. This approval shall be used within two years of the approval date;
otherwise, it shall become null and void. By "use" is meant the beginning of
substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two year period,
which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial
utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a
Conditional Use Permit.
PL -6. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application
being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to 3
one -year extensions of time, one year at a time.
PL -7. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall
substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with
the Planning Division.
PL -8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously
maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community
Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the
Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property
owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan.
The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
PL -9. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for
permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color
and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color
and materials board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
PL -10. Statement of Operations. The applicant shall comply with their Statement of
Operations dated September 23, 2014, on file with the Planning Division, unless
superseded by these Conditions of Approval.
PL -11. Si na e. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s)
PL -12. Final Map Recordation. The Final Maps for 29661 -1 shall be recorded.
PL -13. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction
Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the
building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location,
number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container
size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water
Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California
Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the
City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved
Grading Plan.
PL -14. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a
note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will
be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that
irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any
adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and
will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check
will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being
pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure.
The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly,
and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved
construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape
maintenance for release of the one -year landscape maintenance bond." The
applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections.
PL -15. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note
on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils
report at the first irrigation inspection."
PL -16. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include
water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in
accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo)
factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget.
PL -17. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be
submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance
program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to
assure proper growth and landscape development for the long -term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
PL -18. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape
maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required.
The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are
open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications
and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be
addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a
mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation
mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two
hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation
systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed
consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will
verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one -year landscape
maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to
schedule inspections.
PL -19. Irrigation. The landscape plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped
areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the
public from streets and adjacent property for (private common areas; front yards and
slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls
adjacent to a public right -of -way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping
excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but
may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas).
PL -20. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails
within private common areas.
PL -21. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape
construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate
screening. Provide a three -foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required
by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order
to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after - thought. Plan
planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure
that there are no conflicts with trees.
Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit
PL -22. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape
planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved
construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Planning Director.
The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation
system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
PL -23. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within
individual lots shall be completed for inspection.
PL -24. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be
completed for inspection prior to issuance of the certificate occupancy permit.
PL -25. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those
lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area.
PL -26. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by
the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the
plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation
plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final
Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system
have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community
Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
PL -27. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be
complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
PW -1. Tract Map Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of
Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 (PA01 -0253) as approved on
November 26, 2002 and all its amendments.
PW -2. Specific Plan Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions
of Approval for Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94 -0075) as approved on
November 26, 2002 and all its amendments.
PW -3. Development Agreement. The Applicant shall comply with the Development
Agreement, and all its amendments, between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA,
LLC dated December 17, 2002.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
PW -4. Building Pad. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially
constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered
civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
PW -5. Im�act Fees. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development
Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement
between the City and Developer dated December 17, 2002.
PW -6. TUMF Fees. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in
accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Conditions
B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be
addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for
review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building
Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan
submittal.
B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed
buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial
or multi - family residential projects or a recorded final map for single - family
residential projects.
B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley
School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure
the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and
permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
PW -2. Specific Plan Compliance. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions
of Approval for Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94 -0075) as approved on
November 26, 2002 and all its amendments.
PW -3. Development Agreement. The Applicant shall comply with the Development
Agreement, and all its amendments, between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA,
LLC dated December 17, 2002.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
PW -4. Building Pad. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially
constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered
civil engineer, and the soil engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing
compaction and site conditions.
PW -5. Impact Fees. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development
Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement
between the City and Developer dated December 17, 2002.
PW -6. TUMF Fees. The developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in
accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all
Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08
BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION
General Conditions
B -1. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be
addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for
review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building
Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan
submittal.
B -6. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed
buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial
or multi- family residential projects or a recorded final map for single- family
residential projects.
B -7. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley
School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure
the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees.
B -8. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and
permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work.
B -9. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light
standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits.
B -11. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require
separate approvals and permits
B -12. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the
project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula
Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one - quarter mile of an occupied
residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice of Public Hearing
A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula
PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below:
Case No: PA14 -0219 and PA14 -2909
Applicant: Scott Hansen
Proposal: A Home Product Review application to allow KB Home to construct 99 single -
family residential units in Roripaugh Ranch and a Minor Exception for the side -
yard setback on Lot 41 to reduce the cornerside setback from 15 feet to 13 feet.
The site is located in Roripaugh Ranch on TR 29661 -1 (Planning Area 2) and is
generally located west of Butterfield Stage Road and south of Murrieta Hot Springs
Road
Environmental: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed
project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will
be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and
Negative Declarations)
Case Planner: James Atkins, (951) 240 -4206
Place of Hearing: City of Temecula, Council Chambers
Date of Hearing: January 7, 2014
Time of Hearing: 6:00 p.m.
�rire rlrr �w _ rlw�r� Ij
a.
0.
�� p 111... 11 �►
_ ..
►� ..�
•
C C:
� tai � //I /111 ►� SKYUNE
The agenda packet (including staff reports) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the
Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning
Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City's website —
www.citvoftemecula.org. Any Supplemental Material distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding
any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main
Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. — 5:00 p.m. In
addition, such material will be made available on the City's website — www.citvoftemecula.org — and will be
available for public review at the respective meeting.
If you have any questions regarding any item of business on the Agenda for this meeting, please call the
Planning Department, (951) 694 -6400.
X:\ 2014 \PLANNING \PA14 -0219 \Planning \Hearing -Planning Commission\PC -NOPH PA14- 0219.docx