The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About020392 PC MinutesHINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEHECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MONDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1992 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission was called to order Monday, February 3, 1992, 6:05 P.M., Vail Elementary School, 29915 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, California. The meeting was called to order by Chairman John E. Hoagland. PRESENT: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff, Hoagland ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey Also present were Assistant City Attorney John Cavanaugh, Director of Planning Gary Thornhill, Senior Planner Debbie Ubnoske, Planner Mark Rhoades, Assistant Planner Matthew Fagan, Deputy City Engineer Doug Stewart, Robert Righetti, Department of Public Works, and Minute Clerk Gail Zigler. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMISSION BUSINESS 1. APPROVAL OF AGENDA COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to approve the agenda as mailed, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. Z. MINUTES 2.1 CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND advised that approval of the minutes of January 27, 1992 would be continued to the meeting of February 24, 1992. NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3. SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE NO. 21 3.1 Proposal to construct an ATM kiosk in the parking lot of an existing commercial center. Located at the northeast corner of Front Street and Moreno Road. MARK RHOADES summarized the staff report. Mr. Rhoades advised that the Old Town Historical Committee suggested that the aluminum frame mullions be wood. Staff has proposed that the orange tile wall be deleted and replaced with stucco. MIKE PADBERH, 530 Broadway, Suite 1500, San Diego, representing San Diego Trust and Savings Bank, advised the Commission that they were asked to match the shopping center as well as possible. Mr. Padberg stated that the orange tile proposed for the front is standard for off- site kiosks and the orange is a trademark. Mr. Padberg added that the tile protects against vandalism. Mr. Padberg also requested that the mullions on the sun screen remain aluminum. MARK RHOADES stated that staff's recommendation is a little flexible. He added that the applicant can keep the tile; however, staff would recommend that the color be changed. COMMISSIONER BLAIR stated that she would concur with the modifications by the Old Town Committee; however, understands the applicants need for a grafitti proof surface. CHAIRMAN HOAHLAND stated that he was in support of the kiosk; however, he respected the wishes of the Old Town Committee and would recommend wood frame molds on the front of the sun screem. Chairman Hoagland stated that he would leave the decision up to staff on the color of the tile. COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to Direct staff to issue a letter of Substantial Conformance in accordance with Exhibit "A" and to include wood frame mullions in place of aluminum on the sunscreen and work with the applicant for an alternative to the burnt orange tile, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 4. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27198 4.1 Request to subdivide 6.37 acres into 5 lots at an existing Industrial Park located at 43218, 43234, 43250, 43264 and 43280 Business Park Drive. MARK RHOADES summarized the staff report. PCMIN02/03/92 -2- 02/05/92 CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M. ANITA MILLER, Engineering Ventures, 43500 Ridge Park Drive, representing the applicant, asked for clarification of the following Conditions of Approval: Condition No. 13, Gary Thornhill advised that this condition could be deleted. Condition No. 15, Ms. Miller indicated that she was advised a letter would be sufficient. Condition No. 21, Doug Stewart advised that the purpose of this condition was to allow the cable company to place conduit in front of the building. Condition No. 22, Ms. Miller indicated that this condition refers to prior to the building permits; however, the buildings are almost complete. JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that this condition should read "Prior to the issuance of occupancy permit". Condition No. 23, Ms. Miller stated that although the applicant feels that everyone should pay their fair share, he has already paid 7% of one signal and 11% of another and the applicant feels that he has paid to much. CHAIRMAN HOAGLANDasked if the applicant receives credit for what they have previously paid for. DOUG STEWART advised that signal mitigation fees are applied to regional off-site impacts. These signals do not fall into that category, therefore the applicant has been requested to pay their fair share. COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to close the public hearing at 6:30 P.M. and Reaffirm Environmental Assessment No. 33338 for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198 and Adopt Resolution 92-(next) approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27198, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition No. 13 and modifying Condition No. 15 to read "Prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit", seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: ! COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PCMIN02/03/92 -3- 02/05/92 5. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 27232 5.1 Proposal to subdivide 6.31 acres into 3 parcels on Plot Plan No. 18, approved, located at the northwest corner of Lyndie Lane and Rancho California Road. MARK RHOADES summarized the staff report. CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND asked if the County did not make the applicant pay the Negative Declaration fees, why do they have to pay now. JOHN CAVANAUGH stated that this was a new and separate project and staff could require them to pay the fees. CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND stated that he did not consider changing the lines on a map, to have any environmental impact. COMMISSIONER FORD stated that the law applied to projects that are not graded, and the applicant's project was not graded. MARK RHOADES stated that staff is reaffirming a previous environmental assessment and will be filing a Notice of Determination with the County. GARY THORNHILL stated that when you are reaffirming a previous Negative Declaration, that is usually done one time. JOHN CAVANAUGH advised that after discussions with the Planning Director, and due to the fact that a Notice of Determination had been filed on the initial Plot Plan, he suggested that Condition No. 15 be deleted. COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF asked if there was a provision in the conditions which precluded any parcel being developed prior to another. ROBERT RIGHETTI stated the conditions written to the map treats the entire map as one unit and any grading on the map would be done as a whole. If the plot plans coming in separately from the map and the applicant files for a grading plan, the plot plans have been conditioned to provide sufficient grading work and site improvements, to carry the plot plan and adjacent units that have to go in. CHAIRMAN HOAGLAND opened the public hearing at 6:40 P.M. PCMIN02/03/92 -4- 02/05/92 MARK ASPENSEN, Winchester Development Group, 27311 Jefferson, stated that they were in concurrence except for Condition No. 63, and asked if this condition required a new traffic study. Mr. Aspensen advised that the applicant has already done a traffic study and they are doing the traffic signal. ROBERT RIGHETTI advised that this Condition was written to allow a focused traffic study. COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to close the public hearing at 6:45 P.M. and Reaffirm the Environmental Assessment completed for Plot Plan No. 18, Tentative Parcel Map No. 27232 and Adopt Resolution 92-(next) approving Tentative Parcle Map No. 27232, based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the Conditions of Approval, deleting Condition No. 15, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: 1 COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PARCEL MAP NO. 27239, AMENDED NO. i 6.1 Proposal to subdivide 13.94 acres into six (6) parcels, located at the westerly side of Ynez Road and northerly of Winchester Road. MATTHEW FAGAN summarized the staff report. COMMISSIONER CHINIAEFF moved to close the public hearing at 6:55 P.M. and Adopt the Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 and Adopt Resolution No. 92-(next) approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 27239, Amended No. 1 based on the analysis and findings contained in the staff report and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. AYES: 4 COMMISSIONERS: Blair, Ford, Chiniaeff, Hoagland NOES: 0 COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: I COMMISSIONERS: Fahey PCMIN02/03/92 -5- 02/05/92 AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 90-19 ?.1 Proposal to amend Ordinance 90-19 which establish the decision making process. GARY THORNHILL advised that this item would be passed on to the City Council. PLANNING DIRECTOR REPORT GARY THORNHILL reminded the Commission of the joint meeting with the City Council on Wednesdy, February 5, 1992. PLANNING COMMISSION DISCUSSION OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONER BLAIR moved to adjourn at 7:00 P.M., seconded by COMMISSIONER FORD. The next meeting of the City of Temecula Planning Commission will be on Monday, February 24, 1992. /Cha/~irman~J h/~a~~d Secretary PCMIN02/03/92 -6- 02/05/92